The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 RockaBoatus Archive
The Nature of Women and the ‘Woke’ Problem
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

Anyone who is perceptive of current social and political trends in America knows that women — especially White liberal women — play an inordinate role. They are almost always at the forefront of any protest lecturing others about ‘systemic racism,’ ‘white privilege,’ ‘toxic masculinity,’ and the need for ‘equity’ in every sphere of life.

These same women are given every conceivable platform to spew their revolutionary rhetoric. They demand to be heard, and they haven’t the slightest hesitancy to confront and shout down their opponents. The prevailing attitude among them best fits the popular quote attributed to the late Harvard professor, Laurel Thatcher Ulrich, who wrote in 1976 that “well-behaved women seldom make history.” This was apparently taken out of its context and given the new meaning that if women are to make an impact on society for good, they must rebel against the norm and be disruptive. The notion of a woman who is gracious and well-mannered as she protests is anathema to the thinking of most contemporary liberal female activists.

All of this, of course, is not a recent phenomenon. It has its roots in the women’s suffrage movement beginning in the nineteenth century and increasing in influence ever since. The most notable modern feminists were Jews such as Betty Friedan, Naomi Klein, Gloria Steinem, and the late Supreme Court judge, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, can be named among them. In fairness, there are plenty of gentile women who have also played a significant role in feminist history. Yet it would be hard to deny that Jewish feminists have played a more influential and disproportionate one. I suspect this is due in large part to Jews controlling news corporations, print media, Hollywood, and much of academia.

Feminist women have always created scenes for their cause. They have always engaged in public antics. They have always been vocal and confrontational. What we are witnessing today, then, is not necessarily new, but it is different in its degree and scope.

The contemporary feminist woman of today is not just passionate about what she believes, she is uber-passionate about it. She’s not just a believer, she’s a fanatic. She’s not just on a mission, she sees herself as a revolutionary bent on transforming the world. She cannot be reasoned with. She’s not just ready to argue, but ready also to brawl. She doesn’t just lecture, she screams her message at others. She demands that you listen to her, and if you don’t, she’ll force you to listen. She invades public spaces demanding to be heard.

The modern ‘woke’ feminist is consumed with her own self-righteousness. She is obsessed with virtue signaling before others. She hasn’t the faintest doubt about the rightness of her cause. And anyone who opposes her or even tries to temper her opinions is no different than the most deplorable humans we could imagine. Restraint and moderation aren’t permitted among today’s feminists. Like the most rabid religious fundamentalist, there is no reasoning with them. It is an all or nothing proposition.

The new and hard-core feminists of today are not limited to a few cranks who are childless and have never been married. A good many of these women, instead, are married and have children. They are part of mainstream society. Other than the ‘pussy hats’ they might wear to some rallies, they wouldn’t necessarily stand out all that much from ‘normie’ women.

Nevertheless, leftist women have a number of differences, as revealed by a recent U.K. survey.

  • The most popular LGBT identity is bisexual, which is significantly more common among women than men.
  • When we look at homosexual behavior, we find that it has grown much less rapidly than LGBT identification. Men and women under 30 who reported a sexual partner in the last five years dropped from around 96% exclusively heterosexual in the 1990s to 92% exclusively heterosexual in 2021. Whereas in 2008 attitudes and behavior were similar, by 2021 LGBT identification was running at twice the rate of LGBT sexual behavior.
  • The author provides a high-point estimate of an 11-point increase in LGBT identity between 2008 and 2021 among Americans under 30. Of that, around 4 points can be explained by an increase in same-sex behavior. The majority of the increase in LGBT identity can be traced to how those who only engage in heterosexual behavior describe themselves.
  • Very liberal ideology is associated with identifying as LGBT among those with heterosexual behavior, especially women. It seems that an underlying psychological disposition is inclining people with heterosexual behavior to identify both as LGBT and very liberal. The most liberal respondents have moved from 10-15% non-heterosexual identification in 2016 to 33% in 2021. Other ideological groups are more stable.
  • Very liberal ideology and LGBT identification are associated with anxiety and depression in young people. Very liberal young Americans are twice as likely as others to experience these problems. 27% of young Americans with anxiety or depression were LGBT in 2021. This relationship appears to have strengthened since 2010.
  • Among young people, mental health problems, liberal ideology, and LGBT identity are strongly correlated. Using factor analysis in two different studies shows that assuming one common variable between all three traits explains 40-50% of the variation.
  • Because the rise in LGBT identity is so heavily concentrated on the political left, its influence on the balance of power between the two parties is likely to be limited.
  • College students majoring in the social sciences and humanities are about 10 points more LGBT than those in STEM. Meanwhile, 52% of students taking highly political majors such as race or gender studies identify as LGBT, compared to 25% among students overall.
  • Various data sources indicate that gender nonconformity – trans and non-binary identity – reached its peak in the last few years and has started to decline.
  • Overall, the data suggest that while there has been an increase in same-sex behavior in recent years, sociopolitical factors likely explain most of the rise in LGBT identity.

Yet this is where the potential of their destructive message and influence could be greater than feminists of previous generations. They may not necessarily look like the traditional feminist with their short, cropped hair, tattoos, piercings, blue hair, and the like (there are plenty of modern feminists, admittedly, who still appear as I have described). Instead, they physically appear to be no different than every other adult woman. This gives the feminist message of today a less threatening appearance and, thereby, more acceptable to the gullible women who might entertain such notions.

The question naturally arises why women are so seemingly susceptible to such radical social and political movements? Why do women so often comprise the shock troops and first ranks of any Leftist political protest?

I think there are reasons for this, none of which are accidental.

The first reason lies in a woman’s nature. Women are nurturers. They are disposed to care for, treat and help others. They are natural do-gooders. They have an innate pull to help and ease the suffering of the less fortunate. Their inclination is to make things better. They are helpers at heart. These are not necessarily bad qualities, but they must be kept in check lest it morph into the kind of militant ‘woke’ women who have taken hold in our society.

The collective insanity of our women is perhaps no more perfectly illustrated in the massive numbers of American women who are rabidly pro-abortion. If women do indeed possess nurturing qualities when it comes to babies and children, why are so many of them willing to terminate their pregnancies — even to the point of supporting partial-birth and after-birth abortions?

These same women must literally suppress their most natural instincts in order to support abortion. Spiraling to this level of evil doesn’t occur overnight. No, it occurs incrementally until one completely sears and deadens their moral conscience. What accounts for this other than a nationwide mass delusion of our women? What sort of wickedness has crept into their hearts and minds for them to celebrate laws that permit the deaths of millions of unborn and partially born babies?

The second reason lies in the emotional nature of women. They tend to think from the heart and not so much from the head. Women, generally, tend to be less critical and cautious in their thinking than men. They are often reactionary, and their heartstrings can be more easily pulled than their male counterparts.

Obviously, there are exceptions to what I’m saying. There are plenty of women who are careful thinkers and who are not as easily manipulated emotionally as other women. But in my estimation these kinds of women are the exception and not the norm. They are the outliers. I don’t even think it comes natural to them. They must fight against their more trusting and emotional natures in some way.

Bear in mind that I’m not saying that men are completely free of emotionalism and less critically minded in the way women generally are. There are plenty of men who can be just as irrational at times and emotionally driven. But overall males tend to be different in this realm than females. Men are not so easily emotionally manipulated as women, and in this sense the two sexes really are different from each other.

It should surprise no one, then, why religious charlatans and radical Marxist groups have so easily preyed on females. They too understand the nature of females, and they exploit it for all it’s worth. Most churches are filled with women, and they often lead the various committees and church ministries. Even cosmetic manufacturers target women in their advertisements in ways that comport with the nature and unique proclivities of females.

They know good-and-well that most women are gullible and can be easily manipulated. They would never admit it, of course, but they would not have had the same level of marketing success if these fundamental distinctions were not kept in mind.

Go to any Leftist protest, and you will witness crowds of angry women with posters and picket signs on behalf of their political cause. The sheer numerical dominance of female protesters, in fact, often serves as the impetus for some men to join the cause so they can have easy access to all the women. The point being that women are the ‘weaker sex’ and not just physically, but emotionally and in terms of critical awareness.

I would add that the presence of large numbers of women at Marxist and feminist political rallies serves also to disarm any political opponents who may be in attendance. Who would, after all, like to be surrounded by throngs of hostile and screeching women? Any male who sought to engage them would be drowned out with a barrage of epithets and the vilest profanity. Today’s loud-mouthed ‘pussy hats’ are not ashamed to say what they really think. Even if a melee broke out, what man would want to be filmed fighting a woman? Women, then, are used by Leftist activist groups to intimidate and demoralize any male opposition that might be present.

The third reason lies in what women are told about themselves by those who control the messaging. Women in America are told they can do anything a man can, and even better too. Women are portrayed in the media, television and Hollywood as practically super-heroes. These are lies, of course, but we’re not allowed to say so. Expect consequences if you do.

Turn on any television commercial and the woman is always portrayed as smarter and more quick-witted than any man. Males are portrayed as clueless and dull-minded. Whether it’s working as a police officer or in combat infantry, females can do it all. There are no intellectual or physical barriers, and anyone who suggests there might be is a backward patriarchal fool.

Anyone who appeals to the physical limitations of women compared to men in the realm of sports, is immediately denounced. No amount of reality and facts will persuade the feminist mindset.

For example, during a CBS This Morning interview, the once great professional tennis player (now retired), John McEnroe, tried to talk some sense into host Gail King when he stated in a 2017 NPR interview that if Serena Williams “played the men’s circuit she’d be like 700 in the world.” She wouldn’t accept it even though McEnroe admitted that Serena was “the greatest female tennis player that ever lived.” Gail wanted so badly for McEnroe to say that Serena was the greatest tennis player among both men and women. To his credit, he wouldn’t say it because it wasn’t true.

At one point, McEnroe was asked by one of Gail’s co-hosts, “Would you like to apologize?” Thankfully, he refused to cave to such pressure. Yet it serves to illustrate that fundamental and biological differences between men and women, including differences in physical abilities, cannot be admitted even when the facts are readily available.

Also, why must people apologize for an opinion they have, especially if it is sincerely held and can be proven? The question reveals more about the mindset of the person asking for the apology than the opinion of McEnroe.

The reality of innate male and female differences and their physical abilities should be patently obvious to anyone, but is now denied so as not to arouse the displeasure of today’s feminists. We must pretend that men and women are the same. We must deny what our lying eyes see and what we instinctively know.

Any man who dares to publicly challenge the reality-denying worldview of ‘woke’ feminism will soon find himself de-platformed and likely unemployed. A voice free to express itself, personal dignity, and even employment cannot be given to society’s ‘heretics.’ The very things that feminists demand and force upon society they quickly deny to anyone who challenges their dogma. It only serves to prove just how disingenuous and intellectually dishonest they are at their core.

The fourth reason lies in the breakdown of the family and society. Feminism did not arise in a vacuum. There were an array of historical events and influences that contributed to its development. Like most misguided political movements, especially those that had strong Jewish and Marxist influences, it was just a matter of time before what seemed like a well-intentioned movement for ‘equality’ turned into a nation destroying agenda led largely by crazed women bent on imposing their Utopian values on the rest of us.

It has been said that when even the women of any society become as debased as the men of that same society, you can rest assured that its days are numbered. Surely America’s days are numbered if one considers how far too many of our women conduct themselves, especially when given a platform. Just look at how they dress. You can’t go to any store or public event without seeing an enormous ham-beast wallowing about attired in the tightest and most revealing clothes imaginable. Jiggles and cellulite for all to see. Tatted sleeves on every arm. Pierced like an African tribesmen, and a foul mouth to boot. She has no sense of shame. No self-awareness. God help the man who’d dare to suggest that she’s not the Greek goddess she imagines herself to be!

There is nothing gracious or even feminine about them. Nothing that could be deemed dignified or classy. They are not soft-spoken nor reasonable — the very qualities that might attract more men to their cause!

This is what our American women have morphed into. This is what ‘woke’ feminism does to the women of any society stupid enough to tolerate it. Is it any wonder why so many American men are turning to Asian and Eastern European women who possess the slimness, femininity, grace, and traditional values they want?

Our women, in truth, have abandoned the natural order of things. They are in complete rebellion, but they are too brainwashed and self-righteous to see it. At least two generations of American women have been duped into believing that causal sex, abortion, and climbing the corporate ladder will bring them happiness. A good many of them have discovered it doesn’t. They are now in their late 30s and 40s, and they want to get married and have children. But for most of them, it’s too late.

Some of them have only recently discovered what they were intended to be all along — namely, mothers and homemakers. Instead of saving themselves sexually for their husbands, partnering with those same husbands, and rearing responsible children possessing real values and character, they opted for a corporate career with no husband and no children. They spent their best years pursuing a worthless college degree (at least in most cases) and partying. Having hit the wall by the time they reached thirty, and having gone through multiple sexual partners, there remains few marriageable men and those who are single may not necessarily want a woman who has a host of bed notches to her name.

The fifth reason is because men have largely abdicated their role as leaders in the home, church, and society. Women have rebelled against the natural order of things, no doubt, but men have also allowed it to happen. They have remained content to do nothing about it. They have become passive. Some of these same men have aligned with feminists in order to have access to them and to gain their approval. Other men have done it because like so many feminists they too have a need to virtue-signal.

When our men refuse to take their leadership roles in society, there will arise plenty of women who will be glad to do it for them. And this is where the problems begin.

Far too many men do not have their lives together. They have no framework or worldview in which to interpret the society around them. They have not developed a practical philosophy of marriage and child-rearing. Most men do not even think in such terms. It’s completely foreign to them. Their fathers never taught nor modeled before them how a husband and father is to conduct himself. There is a complete absence on the part of these same fathers of imparting values and practical wisdom to their sons. They either haven’t considered it or don’t think it’s important to do so. Their own fathers may have never addressed such subjects. And so whatever knowledge is gained by our young men is almost always based on a liberal and materialistic worldview — which will always prove detrimental to the lives and future of Whites.

I know this will be difficult for many to accept, but the dominance of women in almost every realm of our society is not a good indicator of our national health. When women and transexuals are promoted to important and even strategic positions within our military, this is not a good sign. It certainly signals to our enemies that we are weak, that we are driven more by popular ‘woke’ rhetoric and artificial constructs than by the safety of our countrymen. Any nation, such as the U.S., that exalts and virtually deifies women sets itself on a course that will surely collapse under the weight of its own stupidity. This is not to say that honorable and virtuous women should not be honored by society, but only that national and social policies should not be determined by what women ‘feel’ nor by any false or inflated views of what they can do.

In other words, when women rule a nation’s most important institutions — especially if its foundation are ideologically ‘woke’ — it will inevitably self-destruct. Consider, for example, Germany’s former Chancellor, Angela Merkel, and the problems she saddled her nation with because of her bleeding heart for Islamic migrants. In Sweden, 47% of its Riksdag (parliament) is comprised of women. Switzerland’s Federal Assembly has 41.5% females. It should surprise no one that these same countries also have extremely liberal social policies and permit large numbers of Islamic people to immigrate.

While there may be some historical exceptions to what I have written, the point remains: Women in national leadership roles generally tend to weaken a nation because of their sympathetic natures, their susceptibility to social contagion, and poor discernment.

The same thing could be said about the presence of women in the police profession. Although women do well in support roles (e.g., dispatchers), they do not have the natural physical traits and upper body strength that’s required to do the job. Most male cops will admit this, albeit privately. Is it any wonder why so many female officers are injured in the course of their duties? Most male felons will comply with a female officer only when she’s accompanied by stronger male officers.

When women are given endless platforms to spew the sappiest political drivel, including the most nation-destroying social ideas, and then celebrated for it, this too is not a good thing. It is a sign that we are done with as a nation since only a people bent on national suicide would permit it. And it’s not because there aren’t any intelligent and perceptive women because there surely are. But when a society tolerates only one viewpoint — a liberal feminist one — there is little hope that that same society will turn out wiser and stronger in the end.

The old 1968 Virginia Slims cigarette TV commercial used to say, “You’ve Come A Long Way, Baby” — but for great numbers of American women, it’s been a self-imposed disaster for themselves and the nation at every step.

(Republished from The Occidental Observer by permission of author or representative)
 
Hide 562 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. Speaking of ‘the nature of women’, Dr Edward Dutton has demonstrated in a recent paper that religion is basically for girls and girlie men:
    https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0191886921000155

  2. Turn on any television commercial and the woman is always portrayed as smarter and more quick-witted than any man. Males are portrayed as clueless and dull-minded.

    Unless the woman is White and the male a POC.

    • Agree: Hangnail Hans
    • Replies: @Arminius1933
    , @Liza
  3. Getaclue says:

    Lib White women are a cancer– as is Harvard and most Ivy League Schools turning out brainwashed Leftists on a conveyor belt– working people are suppose to underwrite the loans given to these people to obtain their worthless Degrees? GTFOH

  4. It is a fact that conformity and group identity are essential parts of the human psyche. If you’ve ever taken a class on child development or simply read a book about it, you will have surely learnt that copying, conforming and doing what others do is an fundamental aspect of child development. Small children instinctively follow the gaze of others and they will copy their movements. During childhood, the child is primarily oriented towards his parents. This continues unabated until the child reaches puberty where the parents stop being the object of his/her affection. Instead, the now pubescent child will do what others in his age group do. This more or less also applies to adults.

    However, this article makes it look like that we ought to blame people for being easily manipulated into doing things. Yet, you cannot really blame someone for doing something that is actually the result of deeply neurobiological processes. A process that he/she is not conscious of and cannot control voluntarily. It is akin to blaming someone for a crime when the person in question has no conception of the consequences that would arise.

    The most popular LGBT identity is bisexual, which is significantly more common among women than men.

    This shows that the rise in LGBT identity is at least partially the result of subconscious forces that make people conform to a certain type of narrative. People who are subconsciously drawn to the LGBT identity/token must somehow come to terms with the issue that they are not actually LGBT. Being bisexual is an easy get out of jail card because it allows the person to conform to the narrative while not actually qualifying for whatever identity/token he feels drawn to.

    It should surprise no one, then, why religious charlatans and radical Marxist groups have so easily preyed on females. They too understand the nature of females, and they exploit it for all it’s worth. Most churches are filled with women, and they often lead the various committees and church ministries. Even cosmetic manufacturers target women in their advertisements in ways that comport with the nature and unique proclivities of females.

    I’m not too sure about your claim that females can be more easily manipulated than men. Women just react better to negative reinforcement. They are more easily shamed and are more anxious than men. On the other hand, men can be easily manipulated into doing a lot of things simply by promising them sex, women, some material goods, mostly things that communicate success, or by challenging their manhood. For example, you can shame women into not eating meat. You can’t do that with men because most men regard this an insult directed against their manhood. So, men will eat more meat. This just shows that the same technique allows someone to easily manipulate both men and women. Only the outcomes differ but the manipulative aspect remains.

    • Agree: Backward
    • Thanks: Kali
  5. A lot of people like to call to mind Ancient Rome and the parallels with the collapse of America. While some areas are similar, such as a loss of morals and foreign invaders, keep in mind the Roman Empire did last over 1000 years. Why, you may ask? Women had no role EVER in the public life of Rome. There is no mention of a female Roman military commander or politician. Roman women of course did influence their spouses and family (Livia is a great example) but never the body politic. A female Consul wouldn’t even be a joke, it simply wouldn’t even be a thought a Roman could processs.

    No female leaders, 1000 years to collapse.

    Since 1920 (19th Amendment) ask yourself: Is America better or worse, and which way is it heading?

  6. anon[299] • Disclaimer says:
    @American Citizen

    Without white women, the jews don’t have the same power to destroy America; you might even argue that they would have never succeeded in accumulating great power at all, since they would have been confronted by a principled and cohesive white population that would be resistant to their characteristic dissembling, scheming, thieving, and manipulation. Sadly, white women have devoted enormous energy and fervor to destroying the men in their lives, and mostly at the behest of jews. It never occurs to these moral idiots, of course, that eventually the guillotine they fashioned for their sons will be used on their daughters, too.

  7. Yes, they’re an unattractive lot. Don’t go for one of them, that’s my advice; take the necessary time and patience to find a woman with the traditional attributes. They do exist. Nil desperandum!

    • Replies: @Mananon
  8. SOL says:

    “Men are not so easily emotionally manipulated as women, and in this sense the two sexes really are different from each other.”

    Yes, though many men are easily emotionally manipulated by young, attractive women.

    • Agree: showmethereal
    • Replies: @Anon
  9. …“You’ve Come A Long Way, Baby” — but for great numbers of American women, it’s been a self-imposed disaster for themselves and the nation at every step.

    Utter Nonsense…

    At no point in the history of the world have any peoples been worse-off when they have more freedom, more options, economic viability and marketable skills, additional education, more influence in the laws and communities that affect them, etc. etc.

    Further, any nation is at its best when individuals are allowed and encouraged to pursue their best skills. It makes no sense that anyone with, say, a fine scientific mind, be prevented or discouraged from becoming a scientist or medical research Doctor.

    People should pursue whatever professions and life activities that interest them the most and for which they have an obvious propensity.

    RockyBoat – You have some additional thinking to do and with greater degree of objectivity.

    • Troll: mocissepvis, Eric Novak
    • Replies: @Anon
    , @JMarq
  10. There’s possibly some confusion between cause and effect here. These very “large” women with the tattoos, dyed hair, and pieces of metal stuck in them likely got that way first. The fact that hardly any men would see a reason to talk to them turns them into men-hating feminists after a while.

    There is the question of why nobody in their lives urged them to become attractive to men best they could. Why? That’s likely a function of a 1/2 century of feminism teaching everyone that they’d better shut up about that.

    There’s nothing like developing a hot body that makes it all better, for everyone involved.

    • Replies: @Commentator Mike
  11. Just today Peak Stupidity featured the meme below, showing the 4 waves of Feminism… so far.

    (PS didn’t create the meme. We just liked it a lot.)

  12. Pablo says:

    “The fifth reason is because men have largely abdicated their role as leaders in the home, church, and society. Women have rebelled against the natural order of things, no doubt, but men have also allowed it to happen. ” Partially true. But to a larger extent, this leadership role was TAKEN from them by a concerted effort to demonize and diminish the traditional role of Men and Family. And of course in the field of employment as well. The Promoters of this deep Hatred of Traditional Family cynically played the Victim Card to Women and Minorities. This is similar to Jewish folks who scream “Anti-Semitism!!!” ANY time one foolishly dares to criticize a Jewish person. A Dogma rooted in Hate and Envy never ends well.

    • Agree: mocissepvis
    • Replies: @anon
    , @Deadbeat
  13. All this supports my personal view that liberalism, in particular LGBTQ ideology, must be eradicated by force. Some may object, saying, “If your side is right, then why can’t you convince people to join you?” The answer is simple: You can never reason someone out of something that person did not reason him or herself into. And liberalism/LGBTQ is not something anyone has ever reasoned him or herself into.

    • Agree: mocissepvis
    • Replies: @CSFurious
  14. JimDandy says:

    I think 50% of women who identify as bi are sleeping exclusively with men. And of that remaining 50% I’d guess the large majority of the sex they’re having is heterosexual, too.

  15. In that case,they’re a happy couple,laughing their way thru a wonderful life,buying insurance,remodeling kitchens,going to tropical resorts…

    • Replies: @Commentator Mike
  16. @anon

    Sadly, white women have devoted enormous energy and fervor to destroying the men in their lives, and mostly at the behest of jews.

    In general, white women seem to have succumbed to the enormous amount of propaganda directed at them that instructs the to hate white men and to have relations and reproduce with non-white men.

    • Agree: Pablo, HammerJack
  17. TKK says:

    Women are vicious. Far more vicious than men. Baseline? Most women are shallow, snarling mental midgets whose inability to regulate their moods renders them effectively insane most days of the week.

    Look at the idiots who trolled and attacked Amber Herd. Depp made jokes about burning and raping her corpse. He is a repellent, sloppy drug fiend who blew 600 million bucks and then goes after a much young woman for money?

    Hordes of these she-beasts stood outside the courtroom, trolled social media and heaped abuse on Herd- a fellow woman. Depp would not let these overweight peasant women pump his gas. He said he fell in love with the mother of his children because of seeing her “back” across a room in a skimpy dress because she was sufficiently anorexic. Can you imagine being this shallow?

    It is the feminization of men. Depp said Herd abused him. He has a private island and a yacht, backed by power and A list connections. And yet our society has allowed him to paint himself as a cowering victim of Domestic Violence.

    The disgusting dyke Judge in his case was also clearly and obviously pro-Depp. I watched some of the trial out of curiosity but had to stop because the blatant favortism for Depp was giving me chest pains.

    Women are so thick they can’t even acknowledge a victim because they are jealous of her looks- and the fact that Depp was clearly in love with Herd. (and still is stalking her further through the legal system)

    And this includes the ridiculous and podunk deification of Asian and “eastern” European women. There is no bigger mercenary than a Thai or Ukrainian woman on the hunt for the Great White Male with disposable income.

  18. Hitch says:

    One aspect of women that Rockaboutus failed to mention is their narcissism. Many, if not most, women are obsessed with their superficial appearance. This is why for generations there have been magazines focusing on women’s “beauty”, this is why there are beauty pageants led by dick-weeds like Trump and Hefner. This narcissism is a window into their soul, and is one of the reasons they are so easily manipulated and brain washed.

    Another closely related aspect of women’s personality is their obsession with their vaginas. This became clear when the “pussy hats” hit the air waves. I would agree that this may be more a symptom of their narcissism than a cause of it, but this obsession certainly has gotten out of hand, and may have been a deliberate target of the Jews and Rabbis who now own the female brain.

  19. neutral says:

    she sees herself as a revolutionary bent on transforming the world

    I should be obvious here that once the woke ideology has taken over all of society that no more “revolutions” will be allowed by the jews. This article should also make it clear by now that ZOG (call woke/cultural Marxism/etc, they are all the same thing) cannot be eliminated by good arguments or political organization, this can only ended by wars that will have to be measured in the hundreds of millions death tolls.

  20. Anymike says:
    @Vergissmeinnicht

    I saw a comment on a online video critical of Islam in which the commenter, as far as I could tell, a white male from a Christian background, called Islam “a religion for men.” I doubt you could characterize the Teutonic Christianity of the Middle Ages as a religion for women.

    Only some religious systems enshrine the female imperative. Within Christianity, there is plenty of variation both in the present day and historically. Evangelical Christianity in its enshrinement of the traditional family and traditional marriage could be deemed pro-male and anti-woke female as well.

    Beyond that, Dutton’s research and his argument essentially are sociobiolgical. He looks at the characteristic that make people religious or not according to some metric and notes the distribution of these traits among men and women. I don’t think his article is a work of cultural criticism. Maybe you could even argue, he does not understand religion. But I haven’t read it and I can’t get it. I don’t have access through an institutional account..

    • Replies: @Anon
  21. GMC says:
    @TKK

    Yes and No but good point. Women got vicious because the Laws gave them the power to judicially have control over men – as in automatic with straining orders, and mostly without any substantial evidence. Then the Law saw that this would be a good time to go into that mans house and take his guns, and look for any other possible ” felony”. Then, if the man gets charged, the media jumps on it { even in a small town} and now the woman just got more power. The man can lose his job, friends and may be looking at – trumped up felonies – in a blink of an eye , which now costs money – lots of it.

    After this happens time and time again , men get to see that the Game is fiercely stacked against them so they have to change their personality or just find em , fuck em and forget em.. This was all think tanked out by a bunch of nation destroyers long ago and all just a part of the Judicial War against the populace. Today its black vs white, men vs. women, jabbed vs non jabbed, abortion vs non abortion, Ukrainians/Americans vs Russians and it’s all part of divide and conquer scheme of the zionists/their employees, globalists, one world order scum and others. It’s Saturday Night Live in America – every night.

    • Replies: @Hitch
    , @Gett
  22. What the hell is a “partial birth abortion”, let alone an “after birth abortion”?

    • Replies: @Badger Down
    , @RedpilledAF
  23. Anon[120] • Disclaimer says:
    @SOL

    …or willing to pay a/the price?

  24. Anon[422] • Disclaimer says:
    @The Real World

    A majority of American women are-/the country is better off?

    • Replies: @GMC
    , @The Real World
  25. Most of these white women you talk about have what I cal “big black cock syndrome”. It’s a white female mental disorder exaggerated by the Anointed One Barry H. Obama, followed by the endless Magic Negroz parading around most everything (((entertainment))).
    Not all white women are this way, in fact most prefer big white cocks than cocks that look like they were burnt in a bar b q grill.
    (((Hollywood))) has a way of turning even kids into gender confused freaks.

    • Replies: @GenerallyPattoned
  26. @Achmed E. Newman

    There’s plenty of men who look just like them: tattoos all over crawling up the neck and on the face too, pierced noses, lips, eyebrows, ragged clothes, going out and about in socks in slippers, etc. not to mention the few wearing skirts and dresses. I suppose they all think they’re following fashion and being cool.

    • Replies: @Jay Fink
  27. @Vergissmeinnicht

    The “Abstract” in the link speaks of “the proxy of regular church attendance”. I must conclude that the backwardness of the writers is of 6 centuries approx, since Nicolaus Cusanus, around 1430, already proved this to be a totally worthless indicator (Exc. II, 397, in: Gesammelte Schriften, Marix Verlag, Wiesbaden 2011).

  28. anonymous[105] • Disclaimer says:

    • Agree: Hitch
    • Thanks: Sarah, Automatic Slim
  29. Anonymous[209] • Disclaimer says:

    Women aren’t as stupid as the author imagines, they just have different political interests. It’s easier for a man to get what he wants when he has more power and control. The opposite is true for a woman. A woman needs power like a fish needs a bicycle. A man wins when he wins. A woman wins when she loses. So when you put someone like Madeleine Albright in charge of NATO, you can expect her to rig the thing to self-destruct. No more Eastern European competition – bring the boys home! That’s how she sees it.

  30. @Bardon Kaldlan

    And the most important thing, to get it all on social media asap.

  31. The modern Talmudics two fists are white women (including “white-washed” women) and blacks. Two centuries ago the threat to Talmudic predatory capitalism was met on several fronts, and the most powerful check against those who would threaten high finance and it’s tentacles, was by creating the women’s rights movement and then feminism.

    • Agree: Hitch
  32. @Vergissmeinnicht

    Like this article, your comment needs a grain of salt.
    Most (Republican) Romans had some degree of belief in their gods, as did Vikings & Germans — I would hesitate to call them “girlie men”.

    • Replies: @Backward
    , @Alrenous
    , @Realist
  33. I’d say in my youth the general public was less favourable to us guys having long hair and earrings than today the general public is to these freaks. I guess in those days people freely expressed their opinion and didn’t care much about your feelings. Nowadays people just keep mum. How many times I feel like asking these tattooed up guys what jail did they come out of but I don’t. I can just imagine some bank executive with tarts and piercings on his face giving me a strange look – they do have them off duty out of the office while at work they cover them with plasters and makeup like Hollywood movie stars do in movies that don’t require tattoos, until the time comes that they won’t have to do even that in board meetings.

    • Replies: @René Fries
  34. @TKK

    You “male” feminists are pathetic. Have some self-respect.

  35. The first reason lies in a woman’s nature. Women are nurturers. They are disposed to care for, treat and help others. They are natural do-gooders. They have an innate pull to help and ease the suffering of the less fortunate. Their inclination is to make things better.

    This is really the conflict that you have hit upon.

    Women are naturally nurturers and in Western society they get caught between their desire to resolve conflicts for the stake of stability and against the Western value of rationality which determines what is true or not. If race is true or at least partly true then the situation isn’t as simple as blaming Whites for all racial problems. This becomes difficult for them as answers to racial problems aren’t as simple as extending empathy.

    It seems that the former wins for most of them which shouldn’t be a surprise since the colleges and media push racial egalitarianism as an all encompassing solution.

    To be clear I don’t blame the faults of Western society on women but this is a real problem that needs to be discussed. White women are indeed at the forefront of a lot of left-wing protests. Jews are often blamed for left-wing movements while in today’s society White women are more likely to lead them.

    Anyways a well written article overall. Nothing at the NYTIMES would compare when it comes to getting to the core of our political conflicts.

  36. Dumbo says:

    Perhaps both men and women are easy to manipulate, only about different things.

    The young women will go to a protest because they saw it on social media. The young men will follow with the idea that they will (mostly erroneously) be able to score with some of those women. In any case, the result is lots of protesters.

  37. @JimDandy

    I think 50% of women who identify as bi are sleeping exclusively with men. And of that remaining 50% I’d guess the large majority of the sex they’re having is heterosexual, too.

    One of those reality based headlines you will never see.

    90% of White bi women enjoy having a repressed identity that grants them a liberal pass and will someday act upon it after they are done sleeping with their White boyfriend.

    Women are not naturally bi even if Hollywood really wants them to be. If that were true then women dating women would be around 90%.

    Even for most bi women it means they let a girl finger them at summer camp and now they have a boyfriend. Most women would choose to be lesbian if they could. They can’t and Hollywood/liberalism can’t change their DNA. Liberalism is not only race denial but gender evolution denial.

    • Replies: @The Usual Suspect
  38. “The first reason lies in a woman’s nature. Women are nurturers. They are disposed to care for, treat and help others. They are natural do-gooders. They have an innate pull to help and ease the suffering of the less fortunate. Their inclination is to make things better. They are helpers at heart. These are not necessarily bad qualities, but they must be kept in check lest it morph into the kind of militant ‘woke’ women who have taken hold in our society.

    The collective insanity of our women is perhaps no more perfectly illustrated in the massive numbers of American women who are rabidly pro-abortion. If women do indeed possess nurturing qualities when it comes to babies and children, why are so many of them willing to terminate their pregnancies — even to the point of supporting partial-birth and after-birth abortions?”

    This is a little pedantic but there’s a problem with the writing here. This first paragraph is very well said, but the paragraph after is out of place. It doesn’t support the point made in the first paragraph. It doesn’t illustrate the nurturing nature of women and in fact illustrates the suppression or perversion of that instinct.

    • Agree: Automatic Slim
    • Replies: @Sarah
  39. Mas says:

    When I used to live in N. America, I always stated that a woman’s place is at home. And now that I live in Iran I’d still say the same thing. For me nothing has changed.

  40. @Vergissmeinnicht

    This statement would need to be qualified at least. If one looks at the most serious manifestations of religiosity, which I would say is monastic vocations, one finds this area dominated by males, with women often playing a supporting role. This is in keeping with men’s tendencies to be pursue things more obsessively and single-mindedly, something that doesn’t come easily to women.

    • Replies: @Backward
  41. karel says:

    to celebrate laws that permit the deaths of millions of unborn and partially born babies?

    Not quite, as these are anything but babies, rather a tissue ranging from a blastocyst to an embryo. My guess is that wanking leads to many more deaths of “unborn babies” than abortion does. This seems plausible as religious fanatics tried vainly in the past to suppress this evil practice.

  42. Backward says:

    Here we go, incels at work blaming women for the technocratic dystopia desired, devised, and enforced by men. Yes you guys must take revenge on women, not on Gates, Schwab, Soros, Bezos, and the other male oppressors. Just smack women into their place and everything will be perfect.
    Besides, isn’t chauvinism a pillar of all Abrahamic culture? And we know that men are not emotion-driven, as evidenced by football fans, motorcyclists, soldiers, traders… you name it. Greed, pride, lust, anger, are not emotions. Only looking after others is emotional, and that’s clearly for mentally-unstable women.
    What a profound analysis, look there’s even charts! 😂

  43. Backward says:
    @animalogic

    Glad you took notice. So many people having no clue on history or religion and feeling the need to show it.

  44. Backward says:
    @The_seventh_shape

    Exactly! Men create ideologies and then blame them on women! I guess articles like this only end up creating more feminists.

    • Replies: @Dumbo
  45. @Fiendly Neighbourhood Terrorist

    Baby gets stuck halfway out. Let’s say it’s coming out feet-first and the head won’t come out. What are you going to do:
    a) Kill the mother and save the baby.
    b) Kill the baby (chop it up) and save the mother.
    c) Let Nature take its course (both die horribly).

    Answer: b) is “partial birth abortion”.

    I guess “after birth abortion” is Americese for infanticide.

    • Replies: @Badger Down
    , @Dumbo
  46. ross23 says:

    You can see the rise of bisexual identity in girls at any western high school these days.

    Any parent of a teenage girl will tell you being bisexual is almost a fashion statement these days at high school, maybe these girls are initially confusing sexual attraction with friendship, i dont know but it certainly is a thing these days that i never saw when i was a boy their age.

    Thing is some claim homosexuality is not genetic rather it is learned behaviour a bit like a dog that bite once will bite again, or when sexual abuse victims go on to become abusers, so by encouraging these girls & promoting LGBT to them they are more likely to “experiment” with their bisexual identity, thus reinforcing it creating a feedback loop.

    This is likely the reason for the rise in those that identify as not hetrosexual.

    Just what many liberals want.

    • Replies: @Dccreddf
    , @Dumbo
  47. @Badger Down

    I’m wondering what the author meant by “causal sex”. I guess it’s when a couple, probably one female and one male, decide to have sex in order to make a baby.

  48. gotmituns says:
    @TKK

    He is a repellent, sloppy drug fiend who blew 600 million bucks and then goes after a much young woman for money?
    ——————————————————————————
    What’s wrong with that?

  49. gotmituns says:

    Mostly, women lack the ability to understand logic beyond a very basic point. They know about gravity but don’t know why. They put themselves in dangerous positions and wonder at the results. They’re like an intermediate group between children and adults. They’re fearful of just about everything because of their inability to understand the world. That’s why men have been their protectors for centuries until the last 60-70 years or so when they’ve rejected that protection.

    • Replies: @paulo
  50. @Curmudgeon

    “Unless the woman is White and the male a POC.”

    Actually , when you see that combination in real life on the street, it’s usually only further evidence of how weak minded and stupid most white females are. Because that nauseating visual is all too often in the form of a miscegenating , interracial couple.
    Miscegenation propaganda in the Jewish controlled mass media is PRIMARILY aimed at white women and teenage girls, from Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner to Jungle Fever to Save the Last Dance. That Jewish propaganda is the ONLY reason why you see so many interracial couples on American and European streets. The numbers don’t lie: according to Pew Research Center, some 27 percent of Hispanics marry whites; when you exclude foreign born Hispanics, that number approaches forty percent. Demographic patterns can be reversed, but miscegenation cannot. It is permanent, genocidal damage. And that’s exactly why the Jews push miscegenation so hard in their controlled mass media.
    As for the white women who succumb to the brainwashing, the domestic violence, child abandonment, infidelity etc. are not even the worst of it. As per the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), blacks are 44 percent of all HIV cases, even though they represent a miniscule 13 percent of the United States population. So called Hispanics , both males and females, are 4 times as likely to be HIV positive than whites, accounting for 30 percent of HIV cases while only 18 percent of the total US population.
    So , at least as far as miscegenation is concerned, the white females who fall for the mass media brainwashing are not only weak.minded and stupid, they must also be suicidal.

    http://occidentaldissent.com/2010/05/15/the-fate-of-northernkind-by-charles-carroll-repost/

    Amfreeparty.org

    Read the book on feminism by F. Roger Devlin, titled “Sexual Utopia in Power “.

    • Agree: Realist
    • Thanks: Sarah, mark green
    • Replies: @anonymous
  51. Sarah says:

    In its early days, Christianity managed to penetrate first among slaves and women😏

    • Replies: @Dumbo
  52. @That one comment

    I agree in particular with your questioning the ide that women are more easily manipulated than men.

    My observation of reality that women who don’t have to worry that a man will use his superior strength on her may well be quite unscrupulous in using female wiles on the poor sucker male.

  53. Hitch says:
    @GMC

    First the Hebrews got control of the justice system, then they used that power to gain control over women through discrimination against men, flattery, and outright bribes.

    This latest action in Spain really says it all. Women think that they can do anything that men do, except for 3 days a month when men are supposed to cater to them. Even worse, women seem to be incapable of figuring out how bitchy they become during this period.

    Women will be offered three days ‘menstrual leave’ every month in Spain under plans set to be approved next week

    – Tampons will have VAT removed from their sale price in Spanish supermarkets
    – Requirement for 16 to 17-year-olds to seek parental permission for abortion will also be removed in laws set to aid in the recovery of reproductive health

  54. Miro23 says:

    At least two generations of American women have been duped into believing that casual sex, abortion, and climbing the corporate ladder will bring them happiness. A good many of them have discovered it doesn’t. They are now in their late 30s and 40s, and they want to get married and have children. But for most of them, it’s too late.

    Not just in the US. Here in Southern Europe there’s been an intense feminist drive into the professions with women now occupying half of these better paid/higher status positions.

    The result is the same. Males are pushed into subsidiary positions. Professional women can’t find suitable high status/high earning males and won’t “marry down”. And anyway, these women are mostly too old to have children (reduced value marriage partners).

    It’s a big problem, especially as they’re some of the most intelligent and attractive women around.

    • Replies: @Rosie
    , @EH
  55. Tucker says:
    @Hitch

    “Another closely related aspect of women’s personality is their obsession with their vaginas.”

    This comment brings to mind a theory that I have had for a very long time. I think this trend probably has its roots in the jewish invention of ‘feminism’, where Hollywood started to heavily promote the idea that women should be sexually aggressive. Prior to the turbulent and destructive 1960’s and the jewish rollout of the feminism poison – the vast majority of White females were far more feminine and far less prone towards being promiscuous. They were more attuned to behaving like a lady and were concerned about their reputations. And, most were very worried about keeping their bodies in good shape because they knew that they had to, if they wanted to attract and hold the attention of men.

    I think that what Hollywood and the feminist subverters have done is to train women to weaponize their vaginas. To use them to manipulate, dominate, punish or reward men based on how well they would cave in to the desires and demands of the female. And, there are far too many men who will allow themselves to become P-whipped.

    I remember reading a quote that was attributed to the actress Raquel Welch: She said: “There is no such thing as hard women, there are only soft men”.

    I can see the wisdom in what she said.

    • Replies: @Hitch
  56. Backward says:
    @American Citizen

    The inability of the Romans to accept female authority even in the provinces is what caused that unnecessary and bloody conflict with the English tribes about Boudicca. Chauvinism is more ingrained in Mediterranean cultures than in Northern Europe. But even in Greece, the role of women was different in different places. In Athens they were almost never allowed outside home, in Sparta they would become athletes like men. Funny how a warlike, aristocratic city-state like Sparta would give women a prominent role? Only to the incels who have no clue on actual history.

    • Replies: @xyzxy
    , @JMarq
  57. Anon[185] • Disclaimer says:
    @anonymous

    This.

    I sure wish it was illegal to shoehorn politics into education. Politics shouldn’t be discussed in most classrooms.

  58. Backward says:
    @That one comment

    What makes men think that women are emotional is men’s inability to detect their own emotions: simple. Of course, this is especially true for the typical incel.
    What I find both saddening and hilarious is that women are once again being blamed for the ideologies invented and enforced by men, in a world absolutely dominated by men-made machines and men-made predatory finance. But I realise all this is beyond the capacity of the average incel. The only evil he sees is, of course, his empty bed.

    • Agree: René Fries
    • Replies: @anonymous
  59. @American Citizen

    Absolutely. An extremely assiduous observation. As students of history , the founders of our original republic also excluded women from the political process. As Rome benefitted from the political exclusion of weak minded, malleable and hysterical females, the nascent United States followed their example. Likewise, the founders scrupulously shunned the idea of democracy, which they saw as mob rule , inevitably ending in a tyranny, as so often occurred in the ancient Greek city-states.
    Since 1920 and the passage of the 19th Amendment, under which the franchise was to be extended to women, the electoral impact of white female voters has proven itself to be a an odious one. Take gun control, for example. The Second Amendment right to own weapons is predicated on two salient needs: first, the need of the individual to protect himself, his home and his family from the growing hordes of subhuman criminals who are emerging in our rapidly deteriorating society, and second , the need of the patriot to defend his country and the Constitution against governmental tyranny . Fundamentally, the idea of self defense is an alien concept to most women. Evolution has created vast physical differences between men and women, including that of physical strength and the ability to ward off and neutralize physical threats. When women evaluate men for their potential mates, they ask themselves( even under today’s spiritually sick leftist ideologies) very crucial yet basic questions: among them, can this person provide for me , can this person produce healthy offspring and can this person protect me. They naturally depend on men for protection from physical threats, and healthy men have a natural instinct to protect women from random assholes who threaten them. The siren song of duplicitous politicians promising to lower crime and increasing security by taking away your means of self defense,i.e. your guns, that message is particularly resonant with women , and their votes have proven disastrously pivotal in pushing the political dial toward greater infringement upon their Second Amendment right to own weapons and increasing the draconian gun control laws. Read the article ” Gun Control : Not what it seems ” , by Dr William Pierce.

    https://nationalvanguard.org/2015/10/gun-control-not-what-it-seems/

    Amfreeparty.org

    • LOL: The Real World
  60. Hitch says:

    One of the greatest acronyms of the last decade is surely RBF, or Resting Bitch Face. It provides an instanteous glimpse into a woman’s soul, and usually it is not a pretty sight.

    • Replies: @Alrenous
  61. Backward says:

    In fact, we are living in the most masculine world ever existed. Too bad few have the intellectual subtlety necessary to realise it.

    “Machines: the motherless daughters of man.”
    Guillaume Apollinaire

  62. Dumbo says:
    @Badger Down

    That’s not what it is. It’s the partial extraction of a fetus, then it’s killing (if it’s still alive), then it’s intact removal.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intact_dilation_and_extraction

    Also, it’s not clear that “both die horribly” is the most natural or normal outcome in such cases, especially nowadays.

    • Replies: @Alrenous
  63. Jay Fink says:
    @Commentator Mike

    I would agree…both men and women look downright scary these days. I have heard it said that projection is a huge factor in women adopting this look. They are attracted to bad boys covered in tatts and piercings and then become that man. If long ago they were repulsed by these guys and favored normal looking decent men I really think they would be prettier and more feminine today.

  64. What is the solution to this problem? How do we turn this around?

    • Replies: @Arminius1933
  65. The essential nature of a woman is different from the role of women in each different culture. American women had an established traditional role, and ‘scientists’ determined that popularion would increase to an unsustainable point, therefore feminism was created. The idea was that women would work and therefore abandon the idea of producing a comuunnity of offspring. This was supposed to bring down the birth rate. So first and foremost, feminism was supposed to get women- not just jobs, but careers important enough to supercede child bearing and upbringing. Then we have activism, which means if you scream loud enough, you will be heard. This can be explained by ‘the wheel that squeaks the loudest gets the grease’. Omitting the fact that screaming does not solve anything, it merely exposes the fact that you exist on the level of a ‘terrible two-year-old’. Then we have modern women who cannot even define the world ‘woman’ defining everything for our edification! This infantile behavior by women is accepted in some cultures such as American Urban Black Culture, and has been embraced by women from Jewish and other liberal persuasions. Notably, this behavior is rejected by many other cultures, such as almost every nation on earth with a Muslim majority. So feminism, created to curb the baby boom population explosion, produced a massive surge of LBGT and ultimately the liscense for an adult woman to exhibit the behaviour of an infant in public and be praised and revered for it. That about sum it up?

    • Thanks: Sarah
    • Replies: @Craig Nelsen
  66. @karel

    The same voices that scream ‘we must ban all guns to save the kids’, are the ones that also scream
    ‘we must be able to abort out kids’! It is our fundamnetal right!’
    So this perfectly explains the inherent deceptive hypocrisy of the ‘activist’!

  67. anon[284] • Disclaimer says:

    When you have a generation of children exposed to pornography, combined with millions of kids growing up without a father, then throw in a good dose of genderbending chemicals in the environment, the outcome is what we see today. A generation of women and men has been lost. We need a reset alright, an old fashioned reset, like an asteroid. As long as people are fat and happy, nothing will change for the better. Sadly, there are those among us who like what is happening, and we know who they are. Pray for an asteroid, it works every time.

    • Thanks: showmethereal
  68. anarchyst says:

    Women who claim that they can “do anything a man can do” are getting their comeuppance with the recent mentally ill male “swimmer” placing “first” in competition with “real” women. Wait till women start getting pushed out of deserved positions by being forced to compete with mentally ill biological males that claim that they are women. If women are smart, they will refuse to compete in such situations. The power of the boycott is effective, especially in collegiate and professional sports. When real women refuse to compete with biological males, things will change, no matter how the mainstream media tries to “spin” it.
    Women need to understand that being feminine is not in any way inferior but is complementary to males. Men and women ARE different. There is no getting around biology.
    As to “yellow fever” (White men choosing Asian females) there is much more to the scenario than most people realize. Yes, there are the “green card” vultures who use White men to gain residency and citizenship, but there are many more who value the treatment that White men bestow on them. Asian males are not known for decent treatment of their women, hence the gravitation of Asian females to White males. I find it sickening to observe White or Asian females with blacks…totally disgusting. Polluting their gene pool with black DNA is akin to humans mating with simians–no difference whatsoever…

    • Thanks: Sarah
    • Replies: @RoatanBill
  69. “The Nature of Women”, eh? Any time I see a man claiming he “understands” women, I understand I am looking at a very foolish man who probably knows nothing much of anything. And all that anger – having a little trouble getting a girlfriend, maybe? Nah, couldn’t be your attitude, they must all be dykes and commies!

  70. anarchyst says:

    When it comes to women, it is their own sense of nurturing and caring for a “family unit” while believing that they can “change” the person they are with and the (false) racial “guilt” that is brought on and perpetuated by our jewish “overlords” in the media and government.
    White women “lap this up”, the (false) sense of “racial unfairness and unequal treatment” due to their psyche.
    One of the most poisonous “siren songs” that white women succumb to is when a black man states: “You won’t date me because I’m black”…the proper response for a white woman should be: “That’s right, I don’t date outside my race”. Instead , the white woman goes along with the false “guilt trip” imposed by the black man, quite often getting murdered, raped, or impregnated with the spawn of this subhuman race, after which the black man absconds from his responsibility, merely being defined as a “baby daddy” by today’s popular culture.
    Feminism has done more to damage the traditional responsible white male-female relationship and nuclear family than just about any other social norm. Adding “race” to the mix makes for a very volatile unstable situation.
    The situation can be reversed by both public shaming and making it known that once a white woman consort with a black, she is “damaged goods”, and should not only be shunned but completely marginalized. Only true contrition and admitting the error of her ways can possibly result in redemption.

    • Agree: Sarah
    • Replies: @Sarah
  71. Thirdtwin says:

    I saw this today:

    “Every girl is bi. You just have to figure out if it’s polar or sexual.”

    • LOL: Hitch
  72. Karl1906 says:

    Don’t look at the white, young women for answers. Instead look at their cunty teachers. Especially the old and grey cunts. And, yes, I’m using the derogatory term for a reason. Because these women “cunted out” their whole lives – for “fun”. And now they want the next generations to throw away their lives too (and the men). That’s the only joy they have left in life. Ruining the life of other people. And blaming other people for their wrong choices. Like old crones like to do at the very end of their lives.

    A couple of years ago I had a very precise moment of insight when some old university teacher-cunt denounced MRA-advocate Karen Straughan on Canadian television. You saw this mousy old cunt with her dreadlocks – now massively a no-no for the likes of her because of “cultural appropriation”. And she lied. You saw it in her face that she was lying. Because she was not looking in the camera. She wasn’t looking at anything straight. How many such lies have you told over the years? How many lives have you ruined by lying? How many people have you denounced and murdered with words?

    The German word for “character assassination” is “Rufmord” – “reputation murder”. And that’s why it’s consequent (for me) to call these people murderers. Because that’s what they want to do. Murder people with words. And they succeed with it too.

    But brave Karen called her out on it. Not that it had any effect. Because you won’t see Karen Straughan on Canadian tv telling the truth. Especially not under the current fascist regime.

    So these old cunts know they will get away with every lie and murder. Because useful tools get used. And it’s not “liberal” society run amok. It’s an establishment using these people to further their way into a society of no individuality – just what you are being told by your peers and the “social networks”. That’s a part of the nightmare dystopia they have in mind for us.

    They’ve been moving from the destruction of the family, to relationships between the sexes, to the indivual. Because without any indivuality only THEY will tell you who you are and what you do.

    And women are considered to be the best “target” because they react stronger to emotional influence. And have been for decades at this point.

  73. Dumbo says:
    @Backward

    Yes. Hell, even feminism is a male idea. Even “Pussy Riot” was created by a man.

    Now, some women can be creative and talented, and even a few can become leaders, but, creating movements or generating new ideas, be they artistic, scientific, religious or political, is mostly a male thing.

    It’s just an intellectual aspect that doesn’t appeal to women in general. This is seen on the autism spectrum, males are just more intellectual and obsessive about ideas in a way that women are not.

    So saying that women tend to be more religious is kinda meaningless. Yes, but they also follow more everything. When society was religious, they were more religious. When society is more about social media and whoring out, that’s that they do.

    It’s silly to blame women for being, well, women. Men (Jews?) are the ones who create the dangerous ideas such as feminism, “wokeism”, transgenderism, etc.

  74. The writer oddly ignores at least one salient fact:

    Men love abortions. And men seek compliant women who want to have sex.

    Men want multiple sexual partners. In fact one could say that men think it’s their NATURAL RIGHT to have multiple sexual partners, especially before marriage. Men quickly justify this with the ‘evolutionary strategy’ science argument: Millions of sperm in the balls = a natural desire for multiple sexual partners.

    However nature ‘naturally’ has a reason for the pleasure of sex: to encourage the animal to make babies.

    So when sex with the compliant woman makes the woman pregnant, as is normal and natural, what does the man want? A child for whom he is responsible financially and emotionally for the rest of the father’s life? No way! He wants an abortion. So he can continue his pleasure seeking ways with compliant women. Children are for the future marriage. Not for the compliant women before marriage and outside of marriage.

    Thus, men love abortion. Even men who are vocally anti abortion are, 99.9% of the time, utter hypocrites. They want sex without babies. They also want sex without a condom. Fact.

    But our esteemed seemingly serious analyst of women in society IGNORES this fact.

    Which is not surprising!

  75. Why do we have female-only chess leagues and female-only math olympiads? Fact is women are mentally inferior too.

  76. Thomasina says:
    @TKK

    Depp got sucked in because he followed his dick. Notice that he chose another drug user. He also went with what was familiar to him; Amber Heard was just like his abusive mother.

    Heard is a manipulative liar, a taker who will never accept responsibility for any wrongdoing. And she’s a poor actor with little to no insight and no tears. She didn’t move anybody because she didn’t even realize that victims of abuse don’t act like she did. She didn’t fear Depp, but he had good reason to fear her. In fact, he’s lucky she didn’t kill him and then lie about it.

    She reminds me of Glenn Close in the final scene of Dangerous Liaisons – ruined. But she dug her own grave.

    • Agree: Robert Dolan
    • Replies: @Hitch
  77. Alrenous says: • Website
    @animalogic

    Christianity is a cult for narcissists and women are prone to narcissistic behaviour by default.

    One way to characterize narcissism is zero empathy. Do not know and do not care what anyone else is feeling. Women indeed do not need to know what anyone else is feeling. They can passively (or tantrum-ly) extract stuff from men, and then hard-wired instincts force them to give some of it to their kids. This is enough that the kids don’t actually die, and the genes propagate.

    Rectifying the names, “girlie men” means men who contract narcissism.

    If “religion” means “Christianity” Dutton is not particularly incorrect. If “religion” means “honouring the divine” then he’s confused to a comical extreme.

    • Replies: @RoatanBill
  78. Corvinus says:
    @anon

    You seem to forget that the Roissy’s and the Roosh’s of the world have undeniably contributed to the fall of Western Civilization. See, they offered advice to men to entice women, whether it be virgins or who had boyfriends or who were married, to have sex with them. When women refused, then they advocated “on to the next to plunder”. When she did finally capitulate, they “pumped and dumped”.

    • Agree: Liza
    • Replies: @spacewanderer
  79. Alrenous says: • Website
    @TKK

    Women, of course, are passive, like electrical sockets. They simply allow anyone to plug in, with the exception that standard models don’t allow two plugs at the same time.

    America respects women. It’s sexist to suppose Heard could have rejected Depp’s proposition.

  80. Alrenous says: • Website
    @Hitch

    Appearance is less superficial and meaningless than talking about politics.

    Though yes women are known for being susceptible to narcissism.
    Adjustment: normally when women go cluster B it’s borderline rather than narcissism, but close enough.

  81. @Hitch

    Those women obsessing about their looks and beauty pageants were at least feminine. Some of these modern freakish looking females are actually anti-women although processing to be feminists, which can now mean whatever they want it to mean.

  82. @Achmed E. Newman

    1 – Aye
    2 – yes
    3 – a few drams
    4 – a coin toss

  83. Stereotyping large groups of people might feel good, as it serves to reinforce what the person doing it wants to believe. But it’s rarely going to shine any light on a complex topic. And so it is with stereotyping half the American population as “natural nurturers” and the like. It’s just not true.

    One effect of the first-wave feminism challenging male domestic violence (in the early 70s) is it enabled an equally large torrent of female domestic violence (mostly against children). Women couldn’t be convicted, even in cases of gross physical abuse, because society believed the “nurturing” nonsense. That was the price of female emancipation (supporting and protecting female physical abuse of children), and it was a price women were more than willing to pay.

    There are no emotional traits common to women vs. those common to men. What is true is that IQ among women hews closer to the mean. There are fewer geniuses and idiots in the female sex, and less variance in IQ overall. There are also obvious physical differences in strength. Liberal-left women are just protecting their privileges, which include a substantial over-representation in government jobs, university jobs, and similar. They’re protesting the patriarchy because that’s what protects their wealth and privilege.

    It’s no different than the yellow “I Support Bombing Dark-Skinned Foreigners” ribbons that half the population sported on their oversize SUVs. Everyone knew that killing Iraqi women and children to improve standards of living “back home” was wrong, and everyone supported it anyway. None of these people has any claim to being morally better than anyone else; it’s all just a power play. A queer NGO director with a degree in equity will agree to murder foreigners as fast as any pol-pot African dictator, and with just as little moral qualm, if it improves her standard of living.

    tldr; The issue isn’t that women are fundamentally different from men, they just secure wealth and privilege mostly through different means than men do. That accounts for 100% of Pussy Power.

    • Troll: Eric Novak
  84. @anarchyst

    If the society is to survive, then the mentally ill trans people should be shunned by employers so they have no opportunity to thrive, survive and end up taking the place of a normal person, male or female.

    This manufactured phase of not only allowing these freaks to act out, but to feature them and glorify their ridiculous lives will pass making way for the next fad. These head cases already have a high suicide rate and once their novelty wears off and their 15 minutes of fame subsides, lots more will exit by their own hand because they have lost the stage they act on now.

    • Agree: InnerCynic
  85. Liza says:
    @Curmudgeon

    Unless the woman is White and the male a POC.

    Yes, but in at least one case it got interesting. This was a commercial for a McDonald’s chicken product, where a blonde woman, nice looking, and a Negro were sitting on the steps and (I am trying to recall this correctly, as someone on reddit said it was in 2004) the man was anxiously rifling thru his bag of McDonalds food. The woman says kinda snootily, “It doesn’t come with a toy!”

    According to some commenters on reddit, you can no longer find that commercial for love or money; every other old commercial can indeed be tracked down, though.

    Heh heh heh…

    • Replies: @Liza
  86. Realist says:
    @animalogic

    Most (Republican) Romans had some degree of belief in their gods, as did Vikings & Germans — I would hesitate to call them “girlie men”.

    Point taken. A better term would be stupid. Their beliefs were inane and totally lacked empathy…killing men, women, and children…concurring territory for narcissistic reasons. Their lives were totally devoid of desire for knowledge…they lived a short primative existence.

    • Troll: Richard B
  87. Anonymous[386] • Disclaimer says:
    @Achmed E. Newman

    Considering that Jews are the force and money behind transgenderism, check out the many articles now appearing on the Internet boasting about how Jews have eight “genders,” of which six are somewhere midway between man and woman.

    As for the single, white lib feminists, in virtually every election they are responsible for electing the leftist agenda’s puppet candidates and no one will suffer more when the SHTF than these white lib feminists. It appears that the more sexually degenerate the Democratic candidates become, the more likely white lib women will vote for them.

  88. @Alrenous

    To you, everything involves narcissism.

    Can’t you find a new word to impress everyone with?

  89. @WingsofADove

    This is the result of betraying God.
    Read the Old Testaments and ponder on the lengths of the punishment each time the yid got out of line.

    The ride hasn’t even begun yet.

    • Replies: @Alrenous
  90. Thea says:

    The antedore is simple: say No. tell your mothers, sisters, daughters and wives to knock it off.

    Any man who dares to publicly challenge the reality-denying worldview of ‘woke’ feminism will soon find himself de-platformed and likely unemployed

    What would your forefathers do? Run and hide.

    Modern America is one big failure by men to stand up to pushy women.

  91. Rosie says:
    @That one comment

    On the other hand, men can be easily manipulated into doing a lot of things simply by promising them sex, women, some material goods, mostly things that communicate success, or by challenging their manhood.

    So true. All you have to do is suggest that a man fears he won’t be able to compete with foreigners and he’ll be all about open borders and outsourcing.

    • Replies: @Rosie
  92. Anonymous[386] • Disclaimer says:
    @Backward

    What a profound analysis . . .

    You refute nothing in the analysis. Go sniff your fingers and shut up, OK?

  93. VRT says:

    As the corona virus took hold my wife (who has become the feminist you’ve described) began working from home, binge watching very dramatic television, eventually sent my step daughter to live with her father (whom I have raised for most of her life), and after 2 homes and years of very hard work now wants a divorce from me. I do not break vows. Apperently all those things I hold sacred, like marrage and parenting, honor and courage are meaningless to her now…bye bye you fat bitch, have fun drinking till your teeth fall out lol.

  94. Realist says:
    @anon

    Without white women, the jews don’t have the same power to destroy America; you might even argue that they would have never succeeded in accumulating great power at all, since they would have been confronted by a principled and cohesive white population that would be resistant to their characteristic dissembling, scheming, thieving, and manipulation.

    Good points. It does appear that Jews have dialed in the White gentile female psyche, more so than the White gentile male.

    • Replies: @Rosie
  95. Rosie says:
    @American Citizen

    Since 1920 (19th Amendment) ask yourself: Is America better or worse, and which way is it heading?

    The old post hoc ergo propter hoc.

    It takes very little historical knowledge to see that negative trends in the last 100 years were already well underway long before women’s suffrage, especially the drive for cheap labor.

    “…f they be good workmen, they may be Mahometans, Jews or Christians of any Sect, or they may be Atheists.”
    -George Washington

    Nothing women ever do can possibly compete with the destruction you lot have spawned by your insatiable desire for cheap labor, as a result of which you imported, then emancipated, then enfranchised the black population, all before ever a woman was allowed to vote.

    And you’re still doing it.

    https://time.com/5491587/koch-brothers-network-immigration-reform/

  96. Rosie says:
    @Rosie

    And then, of course, there’s the fact that TPTB managed to manipulated men into slaughtering each other by the tens of millions. Men are falling for this, still. Their stupidity enables the government to exhaust the blood and treasure of the nation for the enrichment of the few and even for the security of foreign powers.

    These divisive manosphere creeps need to be eliminated from pro-White politics root and branch.

    https://www.e-ir.info/2012/01/19/men-and-womens-support-for-war-accounting-for-the-gender-gap-in-public-opinion/

    • Agree: Liza
  97. xyzxy says:
    @Backward

    Funny how a warlike, aristocratic city-state like Sparta would give women a prominent role? Only to the incels who have no clue on actual history.

    Q: And just what was their prominent role? A: Mostly to produce male children.

    Of course, unlike today, women of Sparta were said to be quite supportive of their men, as they viewed Spartan men superior to other Greeks. If their sons died heroically in battle they were satisfied. If it was otherwise, they were dishonored.

    Wherefore is recorded also in regard to Gorgo, the wife of Leonidas, a saying to this effect: when some woman, a foreigner presumably, remarked to her, “You Spartan women are the only women that lord it over your men,” she replied, “Yes, for we are the only women that are mothers of men!”.

    As she was encouraging her husband Leonidas, when he was about to set out for Thermopylae, to show himself worthy of Sparta, she asked what she should do; and he said, “Marry a good man, and bear good children.”

    [Plutarch Saying of Spartans]

  98. I don’t think you can take economic classism out of feminism. The rich girls set the agenda, and they got bored back in the early 20th century. Then you need to ditch the nurturing thing. Nurturing is our of necessity. No necessity… no nurturing. Aristocrats might be historically the most disfunctional people ever. Ripe for the banker, or manager, to exploit due to them being nanny rather than mummy raise.

    Now think women’s club. Women run in packs. Makes sense since men went out hunting, building, or warring a good bit of the ancient time. Gathering and preserving food takes multiple hands. Help with multiple kids is also needed. The lower 99% turn to daughters and elderly mother. The 1% paid or indentured the lower 99%. We poor gals are hardwired to listen to our female betters. Our ancient betters were nanny reared, bored witless, often married for advantage, and bitter bitches. Not exactly the best choice for girl power.

    Jew girls offering liberation was liberating for the 1 percenters. Screaming at the help or husbands was natural. Now they just scream at everyone. Tearing down what daddy and grand daddy made was and is a hoot. Sleeping with every Tom, Dick and Harry made marrying suddenly an advantage and power play for women. Now men are going incel, the bitter bitching is now taking on a new life. Look at the protests as rich girls attending post modern debutante balls.

    Perhaps this is wishful thinking but great reset will not be kind to feminism. Most won’t be rich girls much longer.

    • Replies: @Alrenous
  99. Liza says:
    @Liza

    Oh, I spoke too soon. Here it is, in a compilation:

    • LOL: Curmudgeon
  100. Sweet Jesus, come and take me away from this Jewish hellscape.

  101. Realist says:
    @Hitch

    Someone once said: If Not for vaginas men would never talk to women.

    • Troll: Richard B
    • Replies: @gotmituns
    , @showmethereal
  102. Dystopian says:
    @That one comment

    “A process that he/she is not conscious of and cannot control voluntarily. It is akin to blaming someone for a crime when the person in question has no conception of the consequences that would arise.”

    This is exactly the type of thinking that got us here. Children and adults who don’t face consequences for negative behavior, will never learn. They must be blamed and held accountable. Western men have abdicated their natural role as protectors and disciplinarians and allowed the world to be controlled by a bunch of psychotic females and their sniveling beta male spawn. The breakdown of western society is the direct result.

  103. Alrenous says: • Website
    @Hitch

    Women don’t have personalities, they have fillings. A woman in her natural state is more or less a blank slate, or rather, an empty vessel. This is a natural consequence of obedience being her highest value.

    America fills its women with bitchiness.

    In theory you could dump out the sewage and fill her with something else, but to a woman being emptied feels worse than death. Further, just like any mug, a film of sewage would cling to her even if you dumped her out.

    The solution is to not fill women with bitchiness in the first place. Give up the current set as a bad batch and try again with the new planting.

    To a woman, being emptied is to have nothing to obey. This means her world is empty of her highest value. Similar to a world without truth, beauty, or love to a man. A world entirely lacking glory. Agonizing.

    Like regular mugs, they may have little designs or markings on the vessel, slightly changing the presentation of the main course.

  104. HT says:

    Jews and their spiritual father, the Devil, have always had an easier time deceiving females. It has been that way from the beginning.

    • LOL: Rosie
  105. Alrenous says: • Website
    @Dumbo

    Farmers deal with unusual birthing conditions all the time without killing either.

    Admittedly women might be somewhat special, but I doubt it. I would buy that it’s harder than with lesser beasts, but not that it’s impossible. Sure you can’t leave it alone, but this is exactly what midwives are for.

  106. Why blame women?

    The root of the problem is higher education brainwashing this shit into the students. Proof? All the shit on the college campuses are proof.

    The other main culprit is the MSM constant promotion of it. So your corporations. The more divided the masses, the easier to manipulate and control. 80% are dumb fucks.

  107. Alrenous says: • Website
    @HeebHunter

    Yids aren’t currently sinning overmuch. They are the vehicles of divine punishment; it turns out being weak is a deadly sin.

    Their masters are suffering horribly, it is true.

    P.S. It’s not even slightly hard to find, right here in your web browser, many accounts of men who did want children (for obvious evolutionary reasons) and were devastated when the woman got an abortion.

    Surveys reliably find that men want children and it’s the women that don’t.

    Of course those same surveys display the overaching power the State/Pope has. The GAE says having children is low-status and you shouldn’t do it, and consequently more than 75% of the population obediently desire to be sterile dead ends.
    Ref: being weak.
    I’m personally just fine with losing 75% of the population to auto-sterilization if the remaining 25% isn’t this degenerate.

  108. Hitch says:
    @Tucker

    I agree with everything you wrote, except that part about Raquel Welch…



    Video Link

    Mr. E from the Transcopolypse is often correct. He would know about soft men and hard women, even about women with hard-ons.

  109. Hitch says:
    @WingsofADove

    Men love abortions. And men seek compliant women who want to have sex.

    Men want multiple sexual partners. In fact one could say that men think it’s their NATURAL RIGHT to have multiple sexual partners, especially before marriage. Men quickly justify this with the ‘evolutionary strategy’ science argument: Millions of sperm in the balls = a natural desire for multiple sexual partners.

    LOL. Women love to stereotype men. Why don’t you drill down a little further….

  110. Sarah says:
    @The_seventh_shape

    ”The first reason lies in a woman’s nature. Women are nurturers. They are disposed to care for, treat and help others. They are natural do-gooders. They have an innate pull to help and ease the suffering of the less fortunate. Their inclination is to make things better. They are helpers at heart. These are not necessarily bad qualities, but they must be kept in check lest it morph into the kind of militant ‘woke’ women who have taken hold in our society.

    👌
    Unfortunately this natural, biological moment is sometimes perverted or even suppressed and when the woman realizes it, it is too late to create a family and have children because of the so-called “career”😰

  111. @WingsofADove

    Men love abortions.

    There is nothing to love about abortion both for men and women. When women talk about abortion rights I tell them that torturing your body is not a right ( even if you are legally allowed to do so ) and doing things that you do not normally like is not a right. A woman can not subject herself to an abortion and claim that she did so because it was her right. The main reason is to get rid of an unexpected problem. Right is not an issue here.

    You have to be careful with how you use your words. If the government kills a criminal is that a punishment ?

  112. GMC says:
    @Anon

    There is an old Texas saying – If Women didn’t have Pussies – there would be a bounty on them.

  113. bert33 says:

    Women and men need to both be in there doing our decidering. Decidering is an ugly, convoluted, boring-as-hell and generally dissatisfying process, but if you don’t work to get people talking and have their say as part of proces then you will have to listen to them complain for years to come.

    THAT having been said, brevity is the essence of good communication, amd some women tend to be interminable ‘chatty cathys’, and once you get e started they will keep right on going long past sundown, during which many men will simply find a side door and something more gainful to do with their hours with no fear of being missed during the proceedings and rightly so.

    By moving out of earshot, men are then free to live rich and fulfilling lives doing ‘man stuff’, like making and fixing things, patronizing hardware stores, shopping equipment catalogs, enjoying the outdoor air, and not having to listen to it all. 🙂

  114. Rosie says:

    Well there’s 15 minutes of my life wasted on reading this drivel.

    As usual, it was very light on empirical evidence because these hysterical antifeminists don’t have any.

    Apparently, lot more liberal women are identifying as bisexual these days, and that is supposed to be evidence that they are particularly susceptible to manipulation. Of course, this conclusion completely ignores the facts about female sexuality. We are, in fact, pervasively bisexual. so it should come as no great shock that liberal women are more willing to admit this than women who aren’t liberal.

    https://www.essex.ac.uk/news/2017/09/28/getting-in-touch-with-our-female-sexuality

    https://www.womenshealthmag.com/sex-and-love/a19947774/straight-women-lesbian-porn/

    Most churches are filled with women, and they often lead the various committees and church ministries.

    And if it were otherwise, misogynists looking for a reason to hate would argue that “the nature of women” is unspiritual and undisposed to service and leadership.

    Is it any wonder why so many American men are turning to Asian and Eastern European women who possess the slimness, femininity, grace, and traditional values they want?

    Yes, of course, that must explain the single-digit birthrates in Korea, Japan, etc. Uberfeminist Scandinavian women have more children than Eastern European women.

    https://www.cairn-int.info/journal-population-and-societies-2019-7-page-1.htm

    Maybe they would have more children if they weren’t so worried about their girlish figures. And no, I’m not kidding. Japanese women are literally undernourishing their babies in the womb because of the intense pressure to avoid weight gain in pregnancy. I can’t imagine starving themselves for nine months makes them eager for another pregnancy.

    https://bmcpregnancychildbirth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12884-021-03819-0#:~:text=Background-,Birthweight%20has%20been%20declining%20consistently%20for%20more%20than%2030%20years,mean%20birthweight%20values%20are%20higher.

    They spent their best years pursuing a worthless college degree (at least in most cases) and partying.

    This crap again! Women with a college degree are more likely to marry and less likely to divorce than women without a college degree. Evidently, most men are not as put off by “bed notches” as this author imagines. Excess births among women without a college degree are unplanned and out-of-wedlock.

    They have not developed a practical philosophy of marriage and child-rearing. Most men do not even think in such terms. It’s completely foreign to them.

    Indeed. They are individualists, and not inclined by nature to put the interests of the group above their own.

    In other words, when women rule a nation’s most important institutions — especially if its foundation are ideologically ‘woke’ — it will inevitably self-destruct. Consider, for example, Germany’s former Chancellor, Angela Merkel, and the problems she saddled her nation with because of her bleeding heart for Islamic migrants.

    Meanwhile, here on planet Earth:

    6 out of 9 Supreme Court Justices are men
    73% of the members of the members of Congress are men
    85% of Fortune 500 CEOs are men

    Men even run the school systems.

    https://aasa.org/schooladministratorarticle.aspx?id=14492

    The fact that Angela Merkel happened to be Chancellor when TPTB decided to flood Germany with migrants is neither here nor there. The flood is happening throughout Europe and has nothing whatsoever to do with whatever puppet the globalist have installed to take the blame for it.

    Indeed, even if Merkel was the cause of the flood, what would that matter? It may be that men and women have different reasons for betraying their people, but it remains a betrayal nonetheless. Whether for profit or empathy, the demographic damage remains.

    Seriously, Mr. Unz, why did you bother publishing this rehash of long-since refuted armchair manosphere b.s.?

    • Agree: Sarah
    • Replies: @Mike Tre
  115. ricpic says:
    @Alrenous

    The bitchiness is tied directly to chivalry. It’s true that we don’t have chivalry in America, but we do have its degraded cousin: insane overvaluation of women. Why insane? Because nothing about their behavior or intelligence warrants the overvaluation. And they know it. Women are bitchy because they have contempt for a society that overvalues them. The disconnect between what they are and how they are valued puts them in a permanent snit.

    • Replies: @Alrenous
  116. Rosie says:
    @Realist

    Good points. It does appear that Jews have dialed in the White gentile female psyche, more so than the White gentile male.

    No they haven’t. They manipulate men and women in different but equally ways. To men, they sell nation-wrecking individualism as true masculinity. (Strong, independent men don’t need no tariffs or immigration restrictions.) To women, they sell nation-wrecking sappy universalism.

    The result is a White population that is totally deracinated, though they have done a better job at deracinating men than women.

    https://ifstudies.org/blog/the-demography-of-the-alt-right

    • Replies: @Realist
    , @spacewanderer
  117. GMC says:

    I had a house up in Alaska and in the back yard was the RR tracks and the train would come along once or twice a day in the summer , less in the winter. But I had this mouse in my garden all the time and he was fun to watch , except one day the train was coming and while he was scurrying across the tracks , he got his tail cut off. But he kept going, except later he thought he should go get his tail back for me to sew it on , but when he went to pick up his tail, the other train came along and cut his poor little head off.

    The Moral of the story is – Don’t lose your head over a piece of ass. Of course this Moral isn’t usually minded.lol

    • LOL: RedpilledAF
  118. Rosie says:
    @Miro23

    The result is the same. Males are pushed into subsidiary positions. Professional women can’t find suitable high status/high earning males and won’t “marry down”. And anyway, these women are mostly too old to have children (reduced value marriage partners).

    Seriously, what is it that you manosphere creeps have against empirical evidence?

    Contra hypergamy hoax theory, the most highly-educated women are in fact the most likely to get married.

    https://www.brookings.edu/blog/social-mobility-memos/2016/08/19/the-most-educated-women-are-the-most-likely-to-be-married/

    It is less-educated women who aren’t marrying, and for good reason. Male dysfunction on the left side of the bell curve means that competition for minimally-functional husband material is intense, to the point that it’s not worth bothering trying to get and keep a man who feels entitled to do as he pleases because at least he’s not a fentanyl addict or something.

    • Replies: @restless94110
  119. Canute says:

    The involvement of the intelligence community in the “feminist movement” goes back to the very earliest days. Gloria Steinem was financed through university on a “scholarship award” generated by a CIA front organization, which made a single endowment to Gloria and then disappeared. No one will ever ask where the money came from to start “Ms. Magazine,” much less the media fanfare that accompanied its every move. The destruction of traditional Christian culture, values and ultimately people – is as much a part of the Talmud as the ink employed in printing the same. The Mossad came into the CIA with the guiding hand of Jame J. Angleton and by 1963, they were in sufficient control to take control of the US. Government directly. All destructive efforts launched to guide America into the septic tank have been Jewish designed and controlled from the very start. Feminism and the lies generated (especially by Betty Friedan) are merely a component of the Zionist protocol.

    • Agree: Poupon Marx
  120. Altai says:

    A good example of this is the day of the Floyd protests in Stockholm. That there were Floyd protests in Stockholm is another manifestation of this process and also the importance of social media. It also didn’t seem to matter that this was the height of the pandemic. But one thing stuck me, a Swedish police woman confronted with such intense social pressure from the almost entirely adolescent female (And with no discernible heterosexual ethnic Swedish males) crowd broke down and became herself a part of the crowd. Her emotional response afterwards is the ultimate expression of this.

    Meanwhile, the same crowd at some point before or after were faced with a brutal line of young male Swedish riot police who took were intent to stop them performing some kind of protest on the metro line. The expressions of distress from the girls when faced with an even more terrifying force for them, male physical aggression, is also instructive.

    I’ve been saying this for a while, the big change that happened is that social media became a real name open platform (You didn’t used to be able to search for people using the pre-Facebook networks and people, often teenagers, would use something between an old-school handle or username and their real name) and social media became, inevitably, the equivalent of video games to young women and adolescent girls. Not only that but a certain type of them became powerusers of social media, the Tumblr BPD types.

    Tumblr became a breeding ground for whole ideologies made from bits of leftover 2nd wave feminism and other weird things that teenage girls with BPD find compelling. ‘Wokeness’ is essentially a product of Tumblr and what people on Tumblr find interesting or engaging.

    Once these ideologies and perspectives were established there they began to migrate out to other heavily young female social media environments. And since these people were the powerusers on a crusade they didn’t face much of any opposition from other more normal women who tended to adopt their perspective after sufficient exposure and uptake making it seem like the ‘okay’ thing and not the ‘not okay’ thing.

    Needless to say plugging girls into a giant online multiplayer game where they are also prone to to be influenced and conform to whatever is the moral parameter produces massive moral panics and virtue-signalling spirals. Teenage girls being politicised, indoctrinated and going on histrionic moral crusades without ever developing any interest in external political themes of economics, labor or geopolitics is the big change in political discourse the last 10 or so years.

    Remember when the joke was ‘there are no girls on the internet’? And Ron Paul was ‘the internet’s candidate’? We went from nerdy guys to histrionic girls being the powerusers of the internet and it’s striking how little commentary there has been on that despite the secondary effects being the central discussions of the last 8 years.

    • Agree: restless94110
    • Replies: @Mike Tre
    , @GMC
  121. @karel

    Keep trying to justify baby killing, however, it won’t work with many of us. Your Hebraic philosophy of nature means nothing to theists.

    • Replies: @karel
  122. @Backward

    You project your own reality when you use a feminist slur–“incel.” The weapons that the Talmudics use are varied, but high finance, Gates, Schwab, Soros, Bezos, Biden, Trump, Obama, etc., and the Mossad, CIA, MI6, DoD, etc., all are able to what it is they do because of what the Talmudics have done to society, West and East, through manipulating females (the women’s rights movement, Feminism, SJWism). The aforementioned list of men and entities all can operate and construct Talmudic plans after the ground has been cleared by those manipulated and traitorous women.

    • Agree: restless94110
  123. anonymous[191] • Disclaimer says:
    @Arminius1933

    The majority of interracial relationships in America involve white males with latina or Asian female + mixed race woman.

  124. @Fiendly Neighbourhood Terrorist

    The right to kill babies after they have been birthed. To show you how sick and evil Jews are, as well as so many women, they are absolutely ok with killing babies. There have been sneaky attempts in legislation, I believe, in the recent past, and much contemporary discussion in academia that even up to a year or two after birth a child can be killed by the mother, as it is her right to do so. Really sick stuff. Talmudism is evil.

  125. Rosie says:

    Men love abortions. And men seek compliant women who want to have sex.

    And before abortion, they were fine with outright infanticide so long as they could get their child-free sex.

    https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna42911813

    • Replies: @restless94110
  126. @Getaclue

    “Lib White women are a cancer.”

    Yes. Therefore I have no sympathy for women who are being edged out by trans-mutants in sports, for example.

    Here in the West, feminists emasculated men for decades, and now women are suffering karmic retribution as trans-freaks take over.

    Meanwhile among men, most are pathetic would-be white knights, desperately fantasizing that if they defend women from the trannies, women will despise men less. It doesn’t work.

    There are several reason for the West’s ongoing collapse, and one reason is mass emasculation. Wokeness is essentially feminist in nature — i.e. childish, selfish, irrational, disgustingly narcissistic, and pathologically self-centered. Everything is about my feelings and my wants. The world has victimized me, and owes me. Everything and everyone exists to serve me.

    We see this sociopathic evil in all aspects of wokeness…

    All men are rapists. All women are innocent victims.
    All hetero-white males are racists. All blacks are innocent victims.
    All Goyim are “anti-Semitic.” All Jews are innocent victims.
    All heterosexuals are “homo-phobic.” All gays are innocent victims.

    Eventually these woke parasites always end up devouring each other, as we see in today’s war between trannies and feminists, and between trannies and gays.

    Wokeness will end when it causes the West to collapse into a Mad Max dystopia ruled by regional warlords.

    This is inevitable.

  127. Anon[191] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anymike

    I doubt you could characterize the Teutonic Christianity of the Middle Ages as a religion for women

    Problem is, anybody can look back on middle age Europe and see the huge swaths of Europe lost by the incompetent, hapless Christians to Arabs and Turks. It was only when Europeans started moving away from Christianity and towards science that they got back on their two feet. And that makes Christianity look very unappealing. The religion is garbage and there’s nothing that can be done to save it. Abandon it now.

  128. The scary thing is, White female liberal wokeism is now affecting global geopolitics. These ignorant libs have no stopping mechanism and always doubling down. I fear nuclear war is inevitable.

    • Agree: restless94110
    • LOL: Rosie
  129. @Vergissmeinnicht

    Buddha was a man. Buddhism is not a religion.

  130. Rosie says:

    Why do we have female-only chess leagues and female-only math olympiads? Fact is women are mentally inferior too.

    Unfortunately for you, we’re not so mentally inferior that we can’t kick your ass in professional school admissions. Your slight IQ advantage makes a big difference in chess and competitive math, in law and medical school admissions, not so much.

    https://www.aamc.org/news-insights/more-women-men-are-enrolled-medical-school

    https://www.enjuris.com/students/law-school-women-enrollment-2020.html

    • Replies: @anonymous
    , @Anymike
  131. @Rosie

    Agree…but, careful there, assigning true responsibility to the masculine set will, invariably, get their emotional hackles up.

    You know, those emotions they claim are so well-measured and appropriate but, in fact, account thousands of murders every year in the USA, countless assaults of men, women, children and animals, destruction of property, rapes, bar fights and on and on.

    Waiting for the day that RockyBoat, or another male, writes an article about the actual emotional train wrecks that most men are.

    LOL, this mere TV ad had guys commenting in complete toddler meltdown mode a couple years ago on another website I read. It was truly a comment thread for the ages! That assuming responsibility thing really gets to them. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UYaY2Kb_PKI

    • Replies: @Rosie
    , @Kali
  132. Dream says:
    @Vergissmeinnicht

    Religion has its faults, but the reason why people like Dutton hate it is because they abhor responsibility and duty.

  133. @That one comment

    ,

    you cannot really blame someone for doing something that is actually the result of deeply neurobiological processes

    Oh yes you can. You would not know the pain and agony I have endured to negate and replace the indoctrination and psychopathy imbedded in me like hard to detect and remove parasites.

    • Replies: @Alrenous
  134. The most infuriating spectacle for the woke persons (they would not want to be called ‘women’, I suppose) is not an old White man holding diametrically opposite views, but a beautiful White woman happily living with a White man, minding her own family, bringing up children, oblivious to the great philosophies of the wokedom.

  135. Nancy says:

    It never made sense to me (75 yo) that women should want what men had, i.e., the ceo office, et al. And I was raised by a struggling single mother back in the 50’s! It is an insult to women to try to persuade them that ‘maleness’ is superior to our sex, and we are helpless ‘victims’. It’s an admission of inferiority. And, it’s another insult to train them to believe that they must demand that ‘society, men, et al’ give them the power they need to be ‘equal’. It’s an admission of weakness, lack of internal strength and personal valuation. I thought it was crazy when I first ran in Friedan, et al in high school… what sane woman envies men?? Most women just wanted ‘equal pay for equal work’.

    BTW, feminists don’t really want ‘equal’ treatment in the law, because it has been unfairly tilted to their advantage since at least Victorian times…. see Bax.

    Hopefully, the lunacy is becoming obvious to most rational women, and they can follow their nature into the areas of real gratification and benefit… economic justice, child/elder welfare, education, real justice, male partners, children, etc. (It would be helpful if this twisted society also actually valued children and marriage… see Hungary!)

    • Agree: Miro23, Kali, Sarah
    • Replies: @Dumbo
    , @Kali
  136. @anon

    Any social construct that impedes the great majority of White women from wanting to or obliging them to produce children above the replacement rate has to be removed or modified.

  137. @Rosie

    especially the drive for cheap labor

    which was totally in discordance with the teachings and the practice of the Catholic church (“far too many saints having each his holiday”), so the Lutheran reform and the French revolution proved to be very useful.

  138. White female fanaticism can be dramatically reduced by this elegant and sophisticated method:

    Bribe The White Lady Voters

    Keep Bribing Till You Get their Votes

    White Women Want Mailbox Money

    All eligible White Women will get ten thousand dollars a month from White Core America.

    Political parties within political parties and White Core America will take over the Republican Party and rename it White Core America.

    Repeal the 19th Amendment or bribe the White Lady bastards

    I say bribe the White Lady voters

    What Do White Women Want?

    White Women Want The Pewitt Conjured Loot Portion(PCLP) Now!

    The Pewitt Conjured Loot Portion(PCLP) will pay each American who has all blood ancestry born in colonial America or the USA before 1924 a cool ten thousand dollars a month. The US Treasury and the Federal Reserve Bank shall work together to conjure up the cash out of thin air, just like the ruling class is doing now.

  139. Rosie says:

    As ever, the manosphere maggots posts some pictures of street protests with lots of women and pretends to draw logical conclusions from that. Seriously, why is this patently unscientific thinking taken seriously rather than laughed at around here? For every Swedish woman at that protest, there were tens of thousands ignoring it.

    That there were Floyd protests in Stockholm is another manifestation of this process and also the importance of social media.

    No, that there were Floyd protests in Sweden is a manifestation of the fact that subversive (male) billionaires have globalized their subversion. By funding Leftist non-profits, they have secured a standing army of paid protestors to be deployed whenever and wherever needed. There is no such conservative network. For some reason, White male billionaires prefer to fund their drive for cheap labor rather than conservative activists.

    • Thanks: Sarah
    • Replies: @Charles Pewitt
  140. paulo says:
    @gotmituns

    Everything you just wrote applies to men equally. Most men are a joke . If it weren’t for women, civilisation would have collapsed long time ago . Women are the natural born managers of human society . Men should stick to football and beer, and keep their bodies in shape to deliver the best sex they can to their female partners

    • Replies: @John Johnson
  141. @Commentator Mike

    How many times I feel like asking these tattooed up guys what jail did they come out of

    …reminds me of a certain Patrick Vlug, “humanistisch raadsman (humanistic counsellor)” of the Dutch govt., who was rather surprised by the “opvallend (eye-catching)” high proportion of tattooed men in the prisons, cf Filosofie Magazine (NL)2/2014

  142. @Rosie

    Hypergamy in women is most certainly real and no hoax.

    Almost all men have experienced or experience it. Why are you linking to an old old article (anything older than 2 years is old) and from the Brookings Institute? What’s wrong with you, woman?

    Would you consider coming out of your cave or wherever you hide from the rest of the world and seeing things as they are in 2022?

    Probably not. As a woman, you are set in your ways and dogmatic beliefs and no facts will ever change that. You go, girrl.

    • Replies: @WHAT
    , @John Johnson
  143. @TKK

    Usually I agree with you, but not this time.

    I watched a great deal of the trial, and I also watched a number of lawyers that analyzed the case on a daily basis.

    Heard is an insane liar. There was no evidence that he ever harmed the woman.

    Nothing.

    It was all lies.

    Yes, he drinks and takes drugs, but he’s not a violent abuser. Nearly every witness for both sides supported the fact that he always tried to get away from her to avoid the fights.

    Heard jumped on meetoo because she thought it would raise her profile in Hollywood….she did it to please the jews who seek to destroy our men, wreck the nuclear family, and lower our birthrates.

    Heard’s loss is a direct loss for organized jewry, and I have noticed that a number of jew owned MSM outlets still side with Heard, even after this overwhelming loss.

    Here is the UK deposition…..you can see the insanity of this bitch very clearly.

    • Replies: @Commentator Mike
  144. Alrenous says: • Website
    @ricpic

    Chivalry is bad anyway. Courtly love was merely feminism, 11th century France edition.

    Women especially hate being overvalued because what they want most in a man is higher status. Nearly everything else is negotiable, but that isn’t. Flipping the genders it’s as if women started a trend of cutting their tits off. Just kind of gross and unmistakably counterproductive in the sexual marketplace. Trading beauty away in exchange for spending more money and a small risk of dying.

    As if? Oh wait. About that.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  145. @Backward

    Here we go, incels at work blaming women for the technocratic dystopia desired, devised, and enforced by men.

    I am critical of incels but this is a real problem that needs to be discussed. Have a look at the Huffpo editorial staff:
    https://www.returnofkings.com/87377/huffington-post-staff-photo-shows-that-their-idea-of-diversity-is-hiring-only-non-black-women

    The most left-wing areas of Academia (social sciences, education, humanities) might as well be a publicly funded women’s college. Just pick one of those areas at your local college and look at staff photos.

    A lot of Unz posters depict the Jews as the intellectual basis of left but White liberal women have been taking the leadership positions. Jews did in fact dominate those positions at one time but White liberal women really are the new left. The modern left is in fact disdainful of Jewish men unless they prove their creds. It is a similar attitude towards Anglo men in that they have to prove themselves as totally submissive or be part of a sexual minority to be accepted.

    Women are less likely to rebel against authority and more likely to accept a false teaching for the sake of social stability. This makes them vulnerable to liberalism. Much of the liberalism pushed in the colleges is in fact designed for women. They don’t really care if the men figure out that it is bunk. If they can get the women then the men will follow and there are only so many leadership positions available.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  146. WHAT says:

    So much pointless blather. “Our men refuse to take their leadership roles in society” lol, as if it ever was a proposition of some kind.

  147. Alrenous says: • Website
    @Old and Grumpy

    The original reason to have a nanny is keeping up with the Joneses. The peasants couldn’t afford a nanny, so aristocrats would get a nanny to show off.

    Then, as such things do, it became a trend. The richest could afford to neglect their kids the most, therefore…

    As it turns out, that’s a bad idea. The human social status system is profoundly dysfunctional. If you must pick only one way to transcend yourself, transcend that right out the door.

    Try being so rich you can afford to avoid doing things that are bad ideas, even if the neighbours tut at you.

  148. WHAT says:
    @restless94110

    This particular femoid has been at it here for literal years, repeating the same femoid dogma, day after day. That’s all it ever talks about, no exception.

  149. @WingsofADove

    Men love abortions.

    Let me put it this way — of the women I knew in my 20s, a few decades back, who wound up unintentionally pregnant and got abortions, it was the boyfriend who was heavily pressuring those women to do so.

    Some of them likely would have anyway because their circumstances wouldn’t have allowed for raising a child or being able to keep their job while pregnant. But, some of those women WOULD HAVE seen that pregnancy through and raised the child. However, it was made clear to them that HE would not be on-board.

    So, yes, this is very true.

    They want sex without babies. They also want sex without a condom.

    Quite obviously, in all of the cases I mention above, he was not using a condom.

    Men who claim moral repugnance of abortion simply make a mockery of themselves. They do not care about the fetuses of strangers; not one whit. Their real life conduct reveals the truth.

    • Replies: @Charles Martel France
  150. @Rosie

    so long as they could get their child-free sex.

    Yeah, because all that men want was and is child-free sex. That’s why rigid marriage values ruled mankind for thousands of years: solely to give men child-free sex.

    According to the Book of Rosie, men want child-free sex so they kill the babies. In this way generation after generation of humans arose: the guiding principle being the desire for child-free sex via baby killing.

    Recommend the Book of Rosie in all schools with lessons 6 hours per day (in order to convince anyone that the Book of Rosie is not another example of female thinking).

    • LOL: Mike Tre
    • Replies: @Rosie
    , @Truth
  151. Alrenous says: • Website
    @Poupon Marx

    Can confirm.

    When a truth touches a lie, it initiates a highly energetic exothermic reaction. When this reaction happens inside your brain, it stings like an absolute bitch.

    Wouldn’t call it hard to detect, though. Admittedly my method is effort-intensive, but it’s guaranteed to work as long as you don’t stop.

    • Replies: @Poupon Marx
  152. @paulo

    Everything you just wrote applies to men equally. Most men are a joke . If it weren’t for women, civilisation would have collapsed long time ago. Women are the natural born managers of human society.

    Who do you think created civilization?

    Women would be using pine cones as tampons and lecturing everyone about the virtues of equality as we sit in grass huts.

  153. @restless94110

    Hypergamy in women is most certainly real and no hoax.

    It isn’t a hoax and if Rosie would like I can dig up the study where they found that something like 10% of European children in a village didn’t have their DNA dad as assumed.

    I think the phenomenon is exaggerated by the manosphere but it isn’t some hoax created by the internet. From an evolutionary perspective women have to be more selective than men. If they are sneak off and “sample up” it raises the odds of offspring success. The modernist view of women is childish and tries to pretend that evolution didn’t apply to them on a sexual level.

    Almost all men have experienced or experience it.

    According to modern society all observations about female sexuality from men are to be ignored.

    Women however can make all the negative assumptions they want about male sexuality and their consensus will be assumed as true.

    Isn’t that right Rosie?

    Rosie likes the modern liberal protections for women (evolution doth not apply to them, men must be to blame) while enjoying criticisms of liberal protections for non-Whites (evolution doth not apply to them, Whites must be to blame).

    • Agree: restless94110
    • Replies: @The Real World
  154. @Anon

    Answer: Yes, unquestionably, both are better off.

    You conflate unrelated issues and malevolent, globalist instigators/agendas with regular people being free to pursue life in accordance to their unique abilities. That’s a logic fail.

  155. @Rosie

    No, that there were Floyd protests in Sweden is a manifestation of the fact that subversive (male) billionaires have globalized their subversion. By funding Leftist non-profits, they have secured a standing army of paid protestors to be deployed whenever and wherever needed. There is no such conservative network. For some reason, White male billionaires prefer to fund their drive for cheap labor rather than conservative activists.

    I say:

    It is evil and treasonous White billionaires who are pushing ANTI-WHITE TOTALITARIANISM — AWT — in all European Christian nations. These evil and demonic and treasonous White billionaires are pushing AWT in order to destroy cultural cohesion and to produce the political atmosphere most conducive to ANARCHO-TYRANNY.

    Mark Zuckerberg and Ray Dalio and Jamie Dimon and Jeff Bezos and Bill Gates and Paul Singer and Mike Bloomberg and all the other White billionaire globalizers are evil rats who push nation-wrecking mass legal immigration and illegal immigration and multicultural mayhem.

    Get the young White men to win the hearts of young White women by repudiating government debt and private debt. Young White women want young White men to fight for them and their interests.

    Obviously, the treasonous rat globalizer filth in the GOP ruling class inspires nothing but scorn and contempt from young White men — and this middle-aged man and plenty of old dogs too!

    It is up to middle aged White men to rhetorically eviscerate treasonous rat scum like Kevin McCarthy and Mitch McConnell and Steve Scalise and Liz Cheney and the rest of the disgusting filth in the GOP ruling class.

    Total debt repudiation and asset bubble implosion should be the goal of all young White men and all White men of any age.

    The WASP/JEW Ruling Class of the American Empire is evil and treasonous and immoral and they must be politically pushed off a cliff to make way for the young White Core American Patriots.

    AFFORDABLE FAMILY FORMATION TO SAVE THE WHITE CORE AMERICAN NATION

  156. Mike Tre says:
    @Rosie

    Thank god for the three comment per hour rule.

    • Replies: @The Real World
  157. karel says:
    @RedpilledAF

    Do you mean the anti-wanking philosophy of the Hebrews? Or have I misunderstood your nebulous statements?

  158. Mike Tre says:
    @Altai

    4chan vs. Tumblr:

    • Thanks: Miro23
    • LOL: Dumbo
  159. Rosie says:
    @The Real World

    Waiting for the day that RockyBoat, or another male, writes an article about the actual emotional train wrecks that most men are.

    Oh yes, men and their ridiculous claims of superior emotional stability! They think that seeking mental health treatment and getting a diagnosis makes you crazy. Of course, it makes much more sense to self-medicate with drugs and alcohol and OD on fent or something.

    You know, those emotions they claim are so well-measured and appropriate but, in fact, account thousands of murders every year in the USA, countless assaults of men, women, children and animals, destruction of property, rapes, bar fights and on and on.

    From what I understand, you couldn’t even attend some medieval banquets without “your Lady.” And even then, you couldn’t bring your weapons. They knew even then that they needed babysitters if they were going to consume adult beverages.

    That assuming responsibility thing really gets to them.

    I try to avoid psychoanalyzing my opponents, because such an approach is usually based on the genetic fallacy (judging an idea by its origin). Nonetheless, at some point, it becomes necessary to acknowledge that you’re not having a rational discussion. Rather, you’re trying to overcome some deep psychological issue and your interlocutor is therefore impervious to reason on the subject.

    For what it’s worth, I suspect that the horror of demographic replacement induces a deep sense of shame in men. They attempt to purge that shame by projecting the blame onto women. It’s really sad, actually, especially since there is no hope for Whites as long as we’re ar each other’s throats.

    • Replies: @Robert Dolan
  160. gnbRC says:

    This essay seems to be written by someone severely lacking social experience, who only has stereotypes at his/her/its limited cognitive disposal – probably someone living in an isolated cultural environment with a characteristic of female abuse propagandized since youth through government program education emphasized by religious leaders. For a better description of the problem, consider reviewing …

    a) The ‘Red Pill’ documentary
    b) [Warren Farrell books and videos]; e.g., The Boy Crisis with Warren Farrell PhD _ Red Man Group Ep. #108_NA

    Exactly why is this essay even on UNR, if it’s not intelligently considered?

  161. Speaking as a woman, this article is spot on about a lot of things, especially about the link between depression and LGBTQ lifestyle. Humans need behavioral boundaries. The more we try to break down these boundaries, the more depressed we’ll get because there is no end to how far down you could go. A lot of the blame of course, goes to Hollywood especially HBO with shows like Sex and the City, Girl, Sopranos, Entourage, Six Feet Under, Euphoria, Mad Men (on AMC) etc. promoting endless degeneracy. Warner Brother’s Discovery+ is now doing a show promoting child drag queens.

    It is true that most women are emotional creatures who are less able to argue with logic or calm. Heart over head. As such women are much more susceptible to group and social pressure, and more easily misled. Not surprisingly, 85% of transgenderism are girls transitioning to boys. Any girl/woman who doesn’t declare herself an “ally” of LGBTQ will be attacked by other women as a hater, like J.K. Rowlings with trans. The appearance of Lia Thomas and other trans female athletes will hopefully put an end to this whole “women are just as strong as men” stupidity. Emotionally yes, physically obviously not. How many female skyscraper builders have you seen?

    I think a lot of the most vocal female leftists today are either 1) women without a father figure, 2) women who’ve suffered sexual abuse by men or 3) married women who only have daughters. I also think most of them, especially the most vocal ones, are not very bright or at least wise. It annoys me to no end how many of these stupid women are now embracing casual hookups, sexual deviance and pornography as “empowerment” of women. Back in the early days of feminism, these were seen as sexual exploitation of women plain and simple. Now the stupid feminists of today like those WNBA players are telling women being on SI’s swimsuit issue is “empowerment” of women. Next they’ll tell us the casting couch is empowerment of women, or that pedophilia is empowerment of children. Who gains at the end of the day but licentious men? But don’t tell that to these idiot women who can’t think for themselves, and again let these cunning men do their thinking for them.

    This article is also right that men must take up their responsibility in this fiasco. It isn’t just men must be men and take up their responsibilities as husband and father, but they must also exercise far more self-restraint and help end the hookup culture. Too many men are only too happy to help that along, including on college campuses. Back in the 90’s women who refused to put out are called bitches (and those who did put out are sluts), these days women who insist on condoms are the bitches, and those who don’t are the sluts, standards keep sinking, and men are very much part and parcel to this with the way they treat women. The Ivy League is now actively promoting Sex Week, sponsored by the campus Hillel and LGTBQ, where all college kids are encouraged to have as many sexual partners as possible, and experiment with all kinds of sex. Every once in a while, when I think perhaps there is hope to stop this trend, like #MeToo to stop the abuse of women by powerful men like the casting couch, men like Steve Sailer will come out swinging instead of taking up their responsibility and condemn these men.

    Women between the ages of 18 to 22 are the most vulnerable age because they just became legal, but are still very naive about the world. Which is why media and academia are trying hard to get at this group, corrupting their soul right from the start. Gen Z is now having less sex, so the licentious men running Hollywood is working hard to change that. HBO Max is on Season 2 of a show called The Sex Life of College Girls by the Indian producer Mindy Kaling, who’s just been named one of TIME’s 100 Most Influential people of 2022. Just when you think HBO can’t go lower, they ALWAYS do.

    Parents, please, talk to your children both boys and girls, we need to restore class and self-restraint to our society.

    “Well-behaved women seldom make history.”

    Kate Middleton defies this. She is beloved because of her class, grace, and her cheerful and dutiful embrace of the role of wife and mother. She and Prince William married the only person each other has ever dated. Whenever I think of all that’s gone wrong in this world, I look to Kate Middleton and Prince William for reassurance that all is not lost. These are two millennials who understood since a young age what duty, integrity and self-restraint are all about, the very definition of class and grace that are lost on too many today thanks to our Jew run world.

    And yes, there is no getting around this. We are at where we are today because of this one group of people. Jews have been shown throughout history to be dishonest, cunning, narcissistic, greedy, power hungry, clannish, pleasure seeking, over sensitive and prone to hysterics. Lack of integrity means they lack the capacity for introspection, deflecting any and all criticism as “anti-Semitism”, which means they never have to change, only need to double down. Some do what they do out of righteousness, others out of pure evil intents – to exact 2000 year revenge on gentile whites. And since they pretty much run the Western world today thanks to their stranglehold on all institutions of import from Wall Street to Hollywood, Beltway to Silicon Valley and everything in between including all our media, academia, judiciary, charitable foundations, military industrial complex etc., and since America is the lone superpower today, it is not surprising that the whole western world has become Jewish. But of course they couldn’t have done it all on their own, too many gentile men and women are too stupid and weak and eagerly go along.

    • Thanks: 36 ulster, Kali
    • Replies: @Dumbo
    , @Robert Dolan
    , @geokat62
  162. SafeNow says:

    Random comments: (1) According to a psych study, Asian-American women who marry Caucasian men are seeking “egalitarian knighthood.” Sounds right. (2) I once commented that lower-grades teachers make terrific wives. A slew of reply-commenters basically told me, “not anymore,” and I then conceded the point. So now what advice do I give a young man? Move to Iowa? Church? Asians? (3) I cannot adjust to the artificially deep female voice; it bugs the heck out of me whenever I hear it. (4) A now-vanishing important female trait is “fairmindedness”; relief from the often too-competitive, too-paranoid, subjective unfairmindedness of testosterone-driven maleness.

    • Replies: @John Johnson
    , @Alrenous
  163. Hillary Clinton, the Matriarch of White women neo-lib/con wokeism probably was the pioneer of pushing its ideologies on the world when she was appointed as Obama’s secretary of state. Seems like boy secretary of state Antony Blinken has taken that wokeism to a new level along with UK’s secretary of state Liz Truss.

  164. Rosie says:

    According to modern society all observations about female sexuality from men are to be ignored.

    When they constantly fail to stand up to empirical scrutiny, yes.

    Isn’t that right Rosie?

    No, John it isn’t right. I don’t claim the right to make unwarranted assumptions about male sexuality. If ever I have done so, please feel free to correct me with evidence to the contrary.

    It isn’t a hoax and if Rosie would like I can dig up the study where they found that something like 10% of European children in a village didn’t have their DNA dad as assumed.

    Yes, why don’t you do that? I shouldn’t have to be the only person around here that actually bothers to get up out of my armchair and do some empirical research once in a while.

    FWIW, the empirical evidence that I am aware of does not support your view, so maybe that village was an outlier because of a prolific rapist or something.

    https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2016/04/160405161120.htm

    If they are sneak off and “sample up” it raises the odds of offspring success.

    It also raises the odds of them getting themselves abandoned or even killed by a jealous partner in a fit of rage. That you think this is a no-brainer says more about you than it does women. It stands to reason that reckless women would long since have been weeded out of the gene pool. I have logic and evidence to support my position. You? Your argument fails because, as usual, you avoid the implications of countervailing selection pressures.

    Of course, even if one concedes the idea of female hypergamy, the question still remains: What exactly constitutes a desirable partner? To the incel, every woman wants what he doesn’t have. Ugly men will tell you that women only care about looks. Poor men will tell you that women only care about money. Clumsy men will tell you that women only care about athletic prowess. Untalented men bemoan the fact that we love musicians. And on and on it goes, anything to avoid the obvious: they’re chasing women who are out of their league.

  165. Dumbo says:
    @Sarah

    Not true. Are you Jewish? The first Christians were Jews. But if you mean pagan conversions, in terms of sex ratio, I doubt there was much difference. It’s not as if women could convert to one religion and men to another.

    • Disagree: Sarah
    • Replies: @Sarah
  166. @Alrenous

    You are talking my kind of language, Brother. Hard To Change is conflated with Impossible, by those seeking exit door marked Convenience. I know from an early age that what was being pumped into me was untrue, lies, and mindless drivel. And that is true for what I was steered away and discouraged to pursue.

    I did not rebel like so many self-indulgent student protesters of the 1960s, who really did not know what they were protesting. I observed and analyzed. Like today, their thoughts are confined to the tracks of a train. Plus, protests then and now, are similar to a party (feeling good is primary, extended thinking leaves you alone with a “Lonely Crowd” and a feeling of being someone elevated and special, above the mundane masses and untermensch). >>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Lonely_Crowd

    If a person were genuinely interested to find out what they truly believed and not what was implanted, it will be an odyssey of purpose and direction. For the more traditionally intelligent, the books of C G Jung, Eric Hoffer provide a tremendous boost. While Hoffer and most other authors focus on the external, it is Jung, as a buddha, that charts the territory from the inside toward out.

    https://www.britannica.com/biography/Eric-Hoffer

    https://www.supersummary.com/the-true-believer/summary/

    The fact that the name of Frederic Bastiat is totally unknown by those in “Higher Education”, or that Jung is neither taught (very dangerous in the development of Mass Formation Psychos/Derangement grooming), nor or recognized, leaves me with no ground for optimism for the future of the West.

    • Replies: @Alrenous
  167. gotmituns says:
    @Realist

    Someone once said: If Not for vaginas men would never talk to women.
    ——————————————————————————–
    Foghett’aboud not talking to them, they’d shoot them like deer.

  168. EH says: • Website
    @Miro23

    Women think higher status will make them more attractive to men. Women find higher status men attractive, and are incapable of imagining that men don’t feel the same way. (Men disagreeing with women must be wrong, anyway, if not criminal — such has been women’s culturally indoctrination for many decades now.) So women seek status, without thought for how it will narrow the pool of potential mates. Even if they had thought of it, it would seldom matter – very few young women are willing to settle for average men, anyway, at 18, they all feel they deserve exclusive title to a top 10% man (except for top 10% women, who will settle for nothing less than a top 1% man). Some women lower their expectations as they age, but usually not until their fertile years are are mostly behind them. Many The impossibility of the math means nothing to their hindbrains, which evolved long before monogamy.

    It’s as if men tried to appeal to women by getting breast implants.

    But women should realize that even when it comes to finding a man with a college degree, with 60% women undergraduates in universities across the globe, at least one out of three college-degreed women will have to settle for a husband without a college degree or remain unmarried.

  169. Personally I couldn’t care less about people’s sexual orientation. They can nock themselves out. I am a heterosapien.

  170. “Psycho-bitches” you say? Yes sir. I’ve seen this steady downward death spiral for decades.

  171. @Robert Dolan

    Amber Heard screams in pain as she takes a swing at Johnny Depp.

  172. Thomasina says:
    @Hitch

    “Many, if not most, women are obsessed with their superficial appearance. This is why for generations there have been magazines focusing on women’s “beauty”…”

    What came first? Did the magazines simply plug into this narcissism and then write articles that women wanted to read, or did the magazines and propaganda set out to steer women in a certain direction, like Bernays did when he and others launched a campaign to entice women to smoke, for instance? Or when everyone started taking a knee.

    Who is leading who? I contend that everything that happens in society is coming from above. Women and men and being led, yet most of them don’t even know it. Thankfully, they are beginning to wake up now.

    I think if ordinary citizens had hold of the media (even one major outlet), things would never have gotten this far out of hand. Notice how the ruling elites are worried and wanting to clamp down on the Internet.

    This destruction is all coming from above.

    • Agree: Kali
  173. Dccreddf says:
    @ross23

    Young women and adolescent females know that making out with their girlfriends turns men on.

    • Replies: @Robert Dolan
  174. Realist says:
    @Rosie

    Point taken.

    • Thanks: Rosie
  175. Hitch says:
    @Thomasina

    This Luciferian makes the case that the Depp/Heard trial was one big satanic ritual, and everyone who watched it was a participant. I tend to believe this.



    Video Link

    People are getting sucked into participating in these rituals all the time. Netflix and Disney are just one giant satanic temple. All these “terrorist” shootings are just stage productions put on by satanists. Presidential elections? Vote for your satanic overlord and participate in the ritual.

    • Replies: @Commentator Mike
  176. Dumbo says:
    @Nancy

    The feminism thing of “being equal to men” is actually stupid for women, because at most they can be “lesser men”, as they lack in some aspects such as bodily strength or intellectual obsession. But they can be great at being women, and in many ways that is an advantage.

    One curious aspect of this change is that many young women nowadays are what one could call “fashion lesbians”; I mean, some, a minority, are actual lesbians, but quite a few do it just for social points. They eventually grow out of it and end marrying.

    • Thanks: Sarah
    • Replies: @Alrenous
  177. Dumbo says:
    @Thinking Woman

    Gen Z is now having less sex, so the licentious men running Hollywood is working hard to change that.

    I think men (average men) are having less sex. Women, I don’t know, probably on the average they are having more. For women sex is always easier to get, and many now see it as a mere means of exchange.

    But good comment, thanks.

  178. Miro23 says:

    Just looking around over time , the happiest people I have met are long married couples. They’re just about always from the same ethnic background, same socio-economic group and are often physically similar (!). They have children and also a good sense of humour.

    Evidence that happiness doesn’t come from diversity, multiculturalism, LGBT, feminism and Sex and the City.

    Rather from duty, integrity and self restraint (both partners) encouraged by a supportive society – ref. Thinking Woman’s conclusions above.

  179. Dumbo says:
    @ross23

    For women, being a lesbian as an “experiment” is no big deal, there isn’t and likely never was a big stigma attached to it. In fact, being considered a slut was worse than being a lesbian. So many women now identify as “LGBT” but they grow out of it soon, and for many it’s just really an identity, not something they practice a lot. They can have a “girlfriend” that they hold hands with but don’t do much more.

    While for men, well, I wouldn’t know, but I guess that taking it up the ass takes a big commitment…

    Also, male homosexuality has much more negative stigma attached to it. So no one “experiments”. Either you’re a homo and like men, or you aren’t.

  180. Legba says:

    I guess we could give sheep the vote and be done with it

  181. anonymous[113] • Disclaimer says:
    @Vergissmeinnicht

    A few thoughts: The connection between Womens Activism and Motherhood? Maternity? …what will happen when Babies are conceived/produced with artificial/machine wombs?? …I remember a female friend so liberal..one day she found out that her husband left her for a gay partners..She became furious about Homosexuals competing with women. I used to teaser and I told her that they were experimenting implanting Vaginas in gay men., that would lead to women being displaced in status..VAGINA power.?? In the age of gender/sexual wokeness that make men claim to be women.., females must be very carfeul..what would happen when women lose VAGINA monopoly?? clones? femaleborgs? virtual wives? ok so they will accuse me/men that disagreed with them of being latent/closet.. homos…and I know, I know after a few rounds of beers and pool..everyone agrees ..Nothing like real vagina…I get it..BUt what will happen when Malthusian Human Genetic Engineering start producing bio/synthetic WOMEN..men?.(huh redefining humans? the future of sex?)…asexual reproduction? sex without reproductive capacity??

    • Replies: @JM
  182. @Mike Tre

    ROFL! Says a dimwit with no ability to rationally counter any of her points.
    Busted, and it was so easy! Smh…

    • Replies: @Mike Tre
  183. Thank you for the fine article. I know plenty of ‘conservatives’ who would eagerly agree with 99.9% of what you’ve written here, and I’d really like them to read it. Unfortunately, I can’t forward this to them, because they all angrily recoil at any perceived criticism of Jews, even the mere two very mild points you make. Unz is great for folks like us who can read things with open minds and without freaking out. But we are quite rare, and your audience is therefore quite limited.

  184. @Thinking Woman

    Metoo is not a movement to help women; it is a movement to destroy men.

    Metoo is just another tool of jew cancel culture.

    Believe women my ass.

    • Disagree: The Real World
    • Replies: @Thinking Woman
  185. @Dccreddf

    “Young women and adolescent females know that making out with their girlfriends turns men on.”

    This is absolutely stupid and untrue, just more jewy bullshit.

  186. @Rosie

    When they constantly fail to stand up to empirical scrutiny, yes.

    (spams random charts and graphs dependent upon polling)

    I will comment on one of your charts. Education is not an example of marrying down. Most degrees that women get are not useful in the economy and do not translate into higher wages. Women are more likely than men to get a degree but those degrees are disproportionately in the social sciences and humanities. Women are also more likely to have student debt so that chart really means little.

    Furthermore studies that correlate education and wages are always dishonest and (liberal) establishment serving by nature because they never separate out intelligence. Basically the person that became the doctor would not have become a starving ditch digger had he dropped out of college. Practically every study related to higher education and outcomes is tainted with egalitarian corruption.

    Instead of trying to study spam why don’t you tell me exactly where you think I am wrong? You believe that hypergamy something entirely created by men on the internet?

    What are your thoughts on this study?

    Women more attracted to masculine mates during ovulation
    https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/272697

    You think it is inconceivable that women might sneak out and “one up” if they feel their mate is unsuitable? Why would they have a cycle that favors masculine men when they are most fertile ?

    I’m not talking about women in the past 10 years. I am talking about female sexuality which isn’t going to change much over the course of 10k years.

    And on and on it goes, anything to avoid the obvious: they’re chasing women who are out of their league.

    So to you it all goes back to the inadequacies of the men. Once again men are all fault because it isn’t possible for women to have less than perfect sexuality.

    Is it not possible for both men and women to have leftover sexual traits from evolution that might not be ideal in a modern society? Can you admit the possibility at least?

    • Replies: @Rosie
  187. @Rosie

    “For what it’s worth, I suspect that the horror of demographic replacement induces a deep sense of shame in men. They attempt to purge that shame by projecting the blame onto women. It’s really sad, actually, especially since there is no hope for Whites as long as we’re ar each other’s throats.”

    No.

    Women deserve every bit of the blame they are getting because they are totally susceptible to all aspects of jewing, and they accept the jewing without any reflection whatsoever.

    Liberalism is a cover for the naked self interest of the jews, and both women and Catholics bow and scrape at the alter of (((liberalism)))

  188. @SafeNow

    So now what advice do I give a young man? Move to Iowa? Church? Asians?

    Church is probably not a bad way to go.

    I read somewhere that singles in protestant congregations are something like 60% female.

    Most guys don’t seem to have the guts to troll the bars. Both genders seem to fear rejection these days. Well part of being a guy is rejection. Anyways I had to be the ice breaker in college for my friends. One of them immediately hooked up with a woman that he thought was out of his league. He still owes me a drink for that.

    • Thanks: SafeNow
  189. @JimDandy

    “Bi” in both women and men (unlike homo or hetero) is usually facultative. i.e., the circumstances surrounding the activity dictate the action. Additionally, it is a matter of whether or not one is even able to willfully consider a same sex partner under any circumstance. With men it’s a prison or a long haul trucking job; or in young men, just a dateless period; but with women it’s a lack of emotional satisfaction derived from the men they’ve been “sleeping with.”

    Importantly, it’s essential to note that “bi” in women is not primarily a genital-focused thing (like in men) – a fact men find difficult to grasp. Male sexuality is 99% genital and almost always impulsive; but genital, in maybe 20% of women – except for that rare nymphomaniac (approx 7% of girls) and not impulsive. Masters & Johnson established those facts (using old time science and mathematical methods) almost 70 years ago; meantime, the porn indu\$\$try has set out to rewrite those facts. Pretty dry, no?

    I get the impression that many people in this forum don’t understand that.

    • Replies: @John Johnson
  190. @John Johnson

    …where they found that something like 10% of European children in a village didn’t have their DNA dad as assumed.

    What time period was that being evaluated? The word ‘village’ rather indicates that is was distant history. And was that study related to Europe (a very broad generalization so, would be suspect based on that alone) or on a specific country or two?

    Let me share a story. I was on a Greek cruise a about 15 years ago and got into a long conversation with an American woman who is married to a Spaniard and they live in Spain. She described some of the old practices in that country in centuries past.

    One included that the Mayor of a town had “the right” to sleep with a bride-to-be the night before her wedding and there was no debate to be had about it if he wanted to do so. So, many, many, many young women all over Spain had to have sex with some lecherous creep before they married. Well, naturally, she then had sex with her new husband the next day and days after.

    In some cases, weeks later, she realizes she is pregnant. Gee, who is the father of that baby? Who knows? They didn’t. It got especially problematic for the offspring because they later sometimes married someone that they were actually blood-related to but, didn’t know it. They then had deformed children.

    So much for “sneaking off” but, color me not shocked that you’d see it that way.

  191. Tobysgirl says:
    @Backward

    Thank God for a bit of rationality! I find male humans to be incredibly testerical and illogical, and this article does not make me change my mind. Always nice to meet up with a rational person of either sex.

  192. Rosie says:
    @restless94110

    That’s why rigid marriage values ruled mankind for thousands of years: solely to give men child-free sex.

    Like all manosphere maggots, you are either stupid , a liar, or both.

    Marriage values were only ever rigid for women. Men were free to get all the child-free sex they wanted — from prostitutes. What do you think happened to the babies?

    • Replies: @restless94110
  193. @WhoaWaitaMinute

    With men it’s a prison or a long haul trucking job; or in young men, just a dateless period; but with women it’s a lack of emotional satisfaction derived from the men they’ve been “sleeping with.”

    I don’t buy that at all. Women have much higher rates of homosexuality in prison (more than triple) and they clearly aren’t sleeping with men.

    I also don’t buy that it is even remotely normal for men to have homosexual relations in a dateless period. I have lived in an area with few women and it didn’t make the men around me more attractive. In fact I have been offered no-tell fellatio from a man and I found the suggestion to be degenerate and nauseating.

    Bisexual seems to be this nebulous term that no one can agree upon. The few openly bisexual women I have met were more interested in men even if they didn’t like admitting to it. I still haven’t met this mythical bisexual woman that is equally attracted to both genders. I’m sure they exist but in liberal theory they should actually be everywhere.

    Liberalism is convincing Whites and especially White women that they need to be anything but straight and normal. That is what is happening. But their DNA drive to establish a relationship with a man still eventually overrules the conditioning.

    • Replies: @WhoaWaitaMinute
  194. @Hitch

    So this one went through the Monarch Programme, LOL. Not doubting the Monarch Programme and MK Ultra but don’t you think some of these depraved degenerates and Satanists chose to do what they did out of their own free will and then as they grow older, uglier and delusional they choose to blame some government programme they heard of somewhere, and through the fog of their drug addled minds convinced themselves that they were victims of it? It doesn’t say much about the Monarch Programme if this is the kind of agents it produces … well maybe a reject from the programme.

    • Replies: @Hitch
  195. Alrenous says: • Website
    @Poupon Marx

    Many claim to want the truth, but their revealed preferences are something very different. Not willing to put any effort into it at all.

    Willing to spend hours and hours virtue-signalling on twitter, though.

    Will put in 100 hour weeks to get a promotion at work.
    Willing to spend nearly five minutes thinking about which work to get promotions in.

    Optimism for the future? They’re getting exactly what they want. Poverty and violence. If they wanted something else they would put effort into getting something else. They wouldn’t stay the course.

    Last Psych called it defence against change. But is it really? No matter how bad the status quo is, they’re afraid of change? Implausible.

    Especially as there are, in fact, here and there, easy ways to improve. I know how to lose weight super easy, for example. Feel hungry never and thus don’t-eat automatically, via delicious food.
    Still won’t do it. What they actually want is to do whatever the government tells them to do. Or something complicated but works out to ‘obey the government’ 99% of the time.

  196. Alrenous says: • Website
    @Dumbo

    Feminists very clearly hate women.

    If they liked women they would want women to be more feminine, not less.

    Feminism is driven by cads, rakes, wife-stealers, and bull dykes who are sore they’ll never be as good at being a man as a man is.
    Exception: women are all in favour of wife-stealing, because they want the option to trade up at the drop of a hat. Or to just play the field a bit and then stay anyway with no “social consequences” or anything of that nature.

    The long-term effects of a wildly disloyal union does not normally impinge upon her consciousness. All about which genes, in the form of children, get how much money.

    • Agree: Sarah
    • Replies: @John Johnson
  197. @Robert Dolan

    Thanks for proving my point. I can’t believe you don’t think men like Matt Lauer, Harvey Weinstein, Bill O’Reilly etc. are despicable for using their position of power to manipulate and take advantage of those who work for them. #MeToo is not about cancel culture. To say so is completely missing the point. It’s about making clear men understood the boundaries when they are in a position of power, and not take advantage of those who are vulnerable. It’s why I can’t respect men like Steve Sailer and his minions, who take every opportunity to whine about white male victimhood and decry #MeToo as cancel culture for men, with zero capacity for introspection, which makes them exactly like those they denigrate: blacks, Jews, liberal women.

    • Agree: The Real World
    • Replies: @Robert Dolan
  198. Alrenous says: • Website
    @SafeNow

    The reverse: terrific wives sometimes went into lower-grade teaching. Largely by accident, since the Prussian school system is horrifically Satanic and it’s kind of obvious. Wanting to work there is not something a psychologically healthy person will keep at for long.

  199. JMarq says:
    @The Real World

    Statistically the most depressed people in Western society are 41 year-old childless and umarried women.

    The vast majority of women who spend their child-bearing years exclusively in the pursuit of career and pleasure end up going through rounds of IVF in order to conceive.

    The question is not whether women should work – women always have worked. The question is whether a career should be a life-defining domain. The evidence – provided by women themselves – is that this is simply a miserable, borderline insanity-inducing life trajectory for most women.

    If you travel, you will see plenty of older bachelors all over the world, happily engaging with different cultures and pursuing their interests – some even end up eventually starting a family in Asia or Latin America. There are virtually no corresponding women in their 40s and 50s. Women do not do well on their own – and that is by their choice, not men’s.

    • Replies: @Rosie
    , @The Real World
  200. Yankee trash lost control of their women completely after the War of Northern Aggression. Prohibition was a typical Calvinist Cunt inspired movement…lol

    Couple that with an influx of dirty Communist Jews in the 30’s and there you have it.

  201. ebear says:

    https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/02/stem-gender-inequality-researchers-bias

    https://www.census.gov/library/stories/2021/01/women-making-gains-in-stem-occupations-but-still-underrepresented.html

    As you’d expect, both articles bemoan the fact that, despite the incentives of the last few decades, women are still underrepresented in STEM, as if a 50% distribution were somehow a natural outcome if only certain barriers didn’t remain, but is this really true? I would argue that this is as good as it gets, and that many of the women presently enrolled in STEM studies will not actually pursue careers in those fields, with medicine as one possible exception.

    The answer is obvious on the face of it: as a rule, they are not naturally inclined. A simple observation in support of that proposal, and I’ll use myself as an example here, not because I’m exceptional, but because I’m more or less average.

    By the time I was 14 I was in charge of maintaining the family car. At 12 I had read my father’s notes from his time as a radio operator in the Royal Navy and became fascinated with electronics – not just radio, but the underlying physics, such that by grade 10 I already knew more physics than my science teacher, who hated me for that (Mrs. Mahabir, from hell’s heart I stab at thee!). Three years in Scouts and two years as an army cadet taught me all kinds of useful things, and as an avid builder of model aircraft, I knew how they worked and by 17 had taken my first flying lesson. By 16 I had helped build several structures, and at 19 had started working on ships where I learned practical engineering, plus basic navigation and boat handling.

    THEN I went to college and pursued a degree in electronic engineering.

    You see the problem, right? How many girls actually want to do those things?

    Incidentally, there was only one woman in my class of 30, and she had been sent there by the government as part of her employment. Fortunately there were also fashion design, commercial art and culinary courses at my campus, so plenty of hot babes to chase, but trust me, you wouldn’t want to talk science to any of them. Think of how long it took for Leonard to catch Penny. A case where art definitely reflects reality.

  202. Rosie says:
    @John Johnson

    (spams random charts and graphs dependent upon polling)

    This is lame. If you have an argument, make an argument. Calling something “spam” doesn’t further the debate.

    Education is not an example of marrying down.

    Yes, it is. Indeed, it is a particularly important one given that manosphere maggots won’t shut up about over-educated women who think they’re too good for everybody, even though they are precisely the ones who are most likely to get married. At the very least, it shows flexibility in adapting to facts on the ground. You ought to be fair and recognize that fact.

    Instead of trying to study spam why don’t you tell me exactly where you think I am wrong? You believe that hypergamy something entirely created by men on the internet?

    I think you are wrong insofar as you claim that female hypergamy is a significant impediment to healthy family formation. I have seen no evidence that this is the case, nor is it self-evident. The fact that men are less choosy than women when it comes to casual encounters in no way implies that they are any less choosy when it comes to marriage. If you tell men they have to pick just one, they get very choosy indeed. (Manosphere maggots will occasionally admit this if you read between the lines.) Making matters worse, men agree on which partners are the most desirable, whereas there is much less consensus among women. Indeed, the manosphere claim that all women are competing for the most attractive men is pure projection- the opposite of the truth.

    https://www.livescience.com/5502-men-agree-hot-women.html

    If women were particularly status-obsessed, they would marry older, established men much more often than they actually do. In fact, most women marry men who are very close to them in age. This is more consistent with the hypothesis that women are looking for a life companion, someone to grow old with. Of course, you can say that a strapping youth is more fit, and able to provide resources and protection, than wealthier and more influential men, but then that is just the point. Hypergamy means whatever a given misogynist at a given moment in time wants it to mean. That being the case, it is nothing more than a term of abuse, designed to pathologize women no matter what we do. At the risk of posting more “spam”…

    Is it not possible for both men and women to have leftover sexual traits from evolution that might not be ideal in a modern society? Can you admit the possibility at least?

    Yes, but that doesn’t relieve you of the burden of proving your claims about women. A plausible hypothesis is not a fact. I didn’t pick this fight. I don’t go around writing obnoxious articles about how terrible men are. Indeed, even all those man-hating feminists who supposedly exist don’t attack men this way. Rather, they are viewed as essentially good, with “toxic masculinity” being learned rather than innate.

    As for the study you posted, yes I have seen that, but I haven’t examined it in depth. From what I recall, it says nothing whatsoever about behavior but rather attraction only, so I don’t see how it helps your case. Indeed, women are only ovulating a couple days a month. It would seem, therefore, that, women’s desire actually works to the advantage of less-masculine men, at least in the marriage market, as they are perceived as more reliable and/or nurturing.

    I suppose if you examine women’s desire, you can find things that are primitive and undesirable, but at the end of the day, that doesn’t entitle you to draw any conclusions about our actual behavior, especially given that the evidence concerning our behavior is almost entirely against you.

  203. @The Real World

    What time period was that being evaluated? The word ‘village’ rather indicates that is was distant history. And was that study related to Europe (a very broad generalization so, would be suspect based on that alone) or on a specific country or two?

    I’ll try to find it. I also suspect that at one time it was the norm to sample the cousin or someone similar looking if the husband’s parts weren’t getting the job done. Male infertility wasn’t written about like it is today. So that would be a factor as well and isn’t technically hypergamy if the woman would have remained monogamous if not for infertility.

    So much for “sneaking off” but, color me not shocked that you’d see it that way.

    No I wouldn’t consider that sneaking off but female sexuality isn’t as primed for monogamy as both liberals and Christians want to believe.

    Doesn’t everyone know a story where DNA daddy might be someone different?

    My wife knew someone that married a Hispanic guy but the baby came out looking waaaaay too White.

    Funny enough my wife suspected this annoying White friend of the husband and the kid is annoying as f and can’t be trusted alone.

  204. Richard B says:
    @Vergissmeinnicht

    Speaking of ‘the nature of women’, Dr Edward Dutton has demonstrated in a recent paper that religion is basically for girls and girlie men:

    One way to define religion would be a revelation of the true meaning of human life.

    In short, it represents the highest value, at least for its believers. But whether or not one looks at any religion as a myth there’s no question that it’s an explanation. Which is a mode of behavior none of us can avoid. And the best explanation of anything is still just an explanation, only verbal behavior.

    The important point of all religions is that they are free of any principle of verification. But so is everything from metaphysics to most opinions, many of which are stated as fact. Just read the comment section here and not just here. People routinely present their personal opinion as absolute fact. As if their world would fall apart if they didn’t.

    You want to talk about girlie men, just question some of these men on their personal opinion or challenge them in any way on their explanation of the world and watch them fly off the handle with a knee jerk reaction. In fact, their reaction reminds one of what Nietzsche once said, in so many words, that whenever anyone overreacts it means they’re lying to themselves about something. Just consider how many people overreact whenever their explanation of the world is questioned or challenged, whether that explanation is an opinion or religious belief.

    Conclusion: as religious institutions crumble the religious impulse gets stronger, not weaker, and moves to things such as politics and personal opinion, both of which operate on the level of gossip. This helps explain the explosion of narcissism and psychopathy and the lust for power. In short, The Dark Triad.

    • Troll: Realist
    • Replies: @Richard B
  205. Hitch says:
    @Commentator Mike

    There is misdirection built upon misdirection built upon misdirection. I certainly cannot say what is or was really going on. But I do believe that pubescent girls make easy MKUltra mind control targets, and I do believe that the benefits of years of young free pussy for those vultures running these programs is a very powerful incentive. Epstein would certainly have been able to explain much of what was going on were it not for his “suicide”.

    It is no coincidence that Gottlieb’s and White’s operation midnight climax was run out of bordellos in New York and San Francisco. Charlie Manson hit the jackpot of underage MKUltra sexpots. The “summer of love” was little more than an LSD mind control orgy.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Midnight_Climax

    • Thanks: Commentator Mike
    • Replies: @Commentator Mike
  206. @Alrenous

    Feminism is driven by cads, rakes, wife-stealers, and bull dykes who are sore they’ll never be as good at being a man as a man is.

    They are bitter that they aren’t men and also aren’t sought after by men. Kind of stuck between worlds where they don’t get the best aspects of being a man or a woman. The available men to them are very low quality and they are deeply bitter that even average men will pass on them unless heavily inebriated. Not good for one’s social outlook especially given that women are more prone to depression from image related issues.

    In college I ran into feminists and not one of them was on the volleyball or cheer team. We are supposed believe this is all “by chance” and that homely feminists with blue hair are just a pattern that only evil men try to see.

    The fact that feminists spend so much time on abortion also speaks volume. You see these women that no one is having sex with show up at protests to demand abortion as birth control. Pretty much the last women in the US that will get an abortion. They will stand with their signs and shout along with left wing gays. Just look at the classic youtube video of the gay protestor kicking a bystander:

    Pro abortion protestors follow a consistent pattern:
    1. Indoctrinated college age women
    2. Homely feminists that are not having sex
    3. Mentally unstable gays

    • Replies: @Alrenous
  207. JMarq says:
    @Backward

    Sparta is one of the most depraved proto-communist states in antiquity. The individual was the property of the state – male homosexuality and paedophilia were compulsory, women were encouraged to act like promiscuous dogs – and to what end – to further the collective. They produced no science, no art, no culture and were eventually defeated militarily by Athens.

    The notion that the Roman empire fell due misogyny is ahistorical. Boudica was quite literally the only female leader in the Roman Empire – and what happened to her? She was defeated and died. There is a reason that there are no significant empires headed by women through history – women are not designed to lead armies.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  208. anon[258] • Disclaimer says:

    Less sex? Women used to complain that men were only interested in one thing. Who would have thought back then that all of woman’s *other* things would some day spoil even that one thing!

    • Replies: @Alrenous
  209. Rosie says:
    @JMarq

    Statistically the most depressed people in Western society are 41 year-old childless and umarried women.

    What complete and utter nonsense. There is noone more miserable than an old bachelor. Women at least have friends, though I certainly concede that wealthy men who can buy a teenage Filipina wife after pumping and dumping their twenties and thirties away are presumably reasonably satisfied with their antisocial, degenerate lives.

    The question is not whether women should work – women always have worked. The question is whether a career should be a life-defining domain. The evidence – provided by women themselves – is that this is simply a miserable, borderline insanity-inducing life trajectory for most women.

    No, that is not what the evidence shows. For the bazillion time, the most highly-educated women are the most likely to get and stay married, and they are having more children than in the past.

    https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2015/05/07/childlessness-falls-family-size-grows-among-highly-educated-women/

  210. @Rosie

    Rosie, please do not project your maggotry on me or anyone. Look in the mirror. Then study the concept of projection. You got it bad, little maggot.

    You see, you are the one who is either stupid, a liar or both. Marriages were extremely rigid for both men and women. And in that rigidity, it was accepted that many women (like yourself) are essentially not that interested in sex or even maintaining an attractive attitude and appearance, while men never tire of sex. Their are evolutionary reasons for that, so neither gender is to blame. It’s the human condition, Rosie.

    Some women–not a one who was ever in your family tree, obviously–figured this out and started selling sex for money and other benefits. Like one of our nearest ancestors, the bonobo, the females liked to get paid for no-strings sex from men.

    Men were never free to get all the child-free sex (via killing the babies, as you theorize) they wanted. But when it was a prostitute? The deal was sex for money, Rosie. The women knew what was what.

    And if there was a pregnancy? I’m sure the women selling sex for money had that all worked out, too. Why don’t you go ask some prostitutes what they do? I mean you are so utterly clueless to at least half of your gender. Take some time to get to know the other half of womanhood! I’m sure it will be an eye-opener–but only if you are curious, inquisitive, and tolerant, qualities in yourself that are sorely lacking.

    You’re just an angry anti-sex school marm, Rosie.

    And no, the men didn’t kill the babies and they didn’t sit around like Kings at Court having no-strings sex while their wives worked 80 hours in the factory. Life was rigid, tough and strict for both sexes throughout history.

    History–a topic you neither know anything about nor care to know anything about.

    So much easier to yowl about how men had it so good back in the olden days you did not live in and know nothing about.

    • Replies: @Rosie
  211. @Vergissmeinnicht

    King Gustavus Adolphus of Sweden, the Protestant hero of the Thirty Years War, was known to be a religious man. There is a painting of him seated upon his horse in front of his army, engaged in earnest prayer immediately before the Battle of Lützen (during which he was killed even though the Protestants emerged victorious).

    Somehow, I can’t picture Gustavus Adolphus as a “girlie man.”

  212. @Thinking Woman

    Metoo is absolutely about cancel culture as it was promoted by the jewish owned media. (Who do you think came up with this shit?)

    The idea that we should believe women no matter what is absurd…..and the Depp/Heard trial revealed this to the world. The jews are butthurt that a man had the balls to fight back.

    There is a LONG list of men and boys who got screwed by this movement. Lots of college boys got kicked out and their lives ruined because some dumb bitch lied and claimed they said or did something they didn’t do.

    Metoo is a flagrant example of jewish feminism gone crazy.

    BLM is also a jewish movement and has the same level of lunacy.

    There is no way to understand anything in contemporary culture if you refuse to do an analysis of jewish involvement in almost every aspect of culture due to their monopoly of media and academia.

    If you have any sort of pattern recognition……you’d be able to see the anti-white hatred that fuels all of the bullshit we are dealing with today…..and you’d also understand that it comes from the NOSE.

    Oh….by the way….when I worked security for VIP’s years ago….I worked for some rich and famous people….and I worked at many parties and social events…..and I saw beautiful women throwing themselves at rich/famous men all night long. None of those men had to harass or rape any of the women. In fact, I actually recall a conversation with a woman who admitted that she came to the party just to meet someone who could “help her.”

    So…..you can try to put all of the blame on the powerful men who “take advantage of the poor innocent women,” or…..you can be a bit more accurate and truthful and just call the women whores.

    You mention Weinstein….pretty sure he actually raped at least one woman. I don’t think Bill O’Reilly raped anybody……I think the big jews just wanted him out to shut down a conservative voice.

  213. Alrenous says: • Website
    @anon

    You’re not supposed to toot your own horn so it’s phrased as a complaint.

    “Men are so interested in me I get hit on too often, lol.”
    “I’m so hot my man can’t get his mind out of my pants, kek.”

    Something like 80% of the time, a woman’s complaints are humblebragging. It’s one of the many reasons it’s traditional not to listen when your woman is talking.

  214. Mike Tre says:
    @The Real World

    Rosie has been refuted here for years. I’m not wasting anymore time with her.

    By all means keep white knighting. Maybe it’ll get you laid one day.

    • LOL: Rosie
    • Replies: @Truth
  215. Alrenous says: • Website
    @John Johnson

    Yes, excuse me.

    Bull dykes and the 2/10 crowd.
    With the odd entitled 5 who thinks she deserves a 9 because she watched too much Hollywood. “We’re all equal, which means I’m equal to Johnny Depp’s wife, which means my last name is going to be Depp! Squee! It’s what’s inside that counts!”

  216. Alrenous says: • Website
    @Robert Dolan

    Lots of college boys got kicked out and their lives ruined because some dumb bitch lied and claimed they said or did something they didn’t do.

    Except they should have seen it coming miles off.

    False rape/whatever accusations have been a thing for decades, and getting worse. It’s time and past time to test women for leftishness. If she’s far enough left to #believeallwomen, then run, don’t walk.

    I personally suggest explicitly mentioning it. “Yeah I’d love to hit on you but unfortunately the risk of false rape accusation is too high. As a result I’m politically celibate.”

    Fun fact: you can’t even hold out for marriage unless you’re a divorce-rape cuck.

    Basically the correct thing to do is offer a fake name and address, then ditch the bitch once she gives birth. Be the cuckoo, not the cuckold.
    Did you want a loving, supportive relationship? Too bad. Fuck off with that criminal shit – we outlawed those sixty years ago.

    I kind of think leftists #metoo’ing each other is a high-stakes game of musical chairs. “I dare you to risk the false rape accusation.” “I’m in if you are!” “Deal!” Everyone knows it’s fake, but that’s just how you lose the game. Manipulate her into thinking she dumped you or whatever, then you win. Do something dumb, get wrecked – the game is nobody is quite sure what exactly counts as [dumb].

    • Replies: @Rosie
  217. anon[949] • Disclaimer says:

    Woman’s greater participation in homosexual tourism does nothing to dispel the impression that she has no idea what she wants. The only thing she knows for sure is that *you* had better know what she wants and that *you* had better provide it.

    • Replies: @John Johnson
  218. Rosie says:
    @restless94110

    Men were never free to get all the child-free sex (via killing the babies, as you theorize) they wanted. But when it was a prostitute? The deal was sex for money, Rosie. The women knew what was what.

    I didn’t say they killed the babies. I said they were fine with infanticide so long as they could get child-free sex from prostitutes.

    That said, I suspect they probably did kill lots of babies.

    From Wikipedia, with citations:

    The practice was prevalent in ancient Rome, as well. Philo was the first philosopher to speak out against it.[35][36] A letter from a Roman citizen to his sister, or a pregnant wife from her husband,[37] dating from 1 BCE, demonstrates the casual nature with which infanticide was often viewed:

    “I am still in Alexandria. … I beg and plead with you to take care of our little child, and as soon as we receive wages, I will send them to you. In the meantime, if (good fortune to you!) you give birth, if it is a boy, let it live; if it is a girl, expose it.”,[38][39] “If you give birth to a boy, keep it. If it is a girl, expose it. Try not to worry. I’ll send the money as soon as we get paid.”[40]

    Isn’t that special?

    • Replies: @restless94110
  219. Rosie says:
    @Alrenous

    I personally suggest explicitly mentioning it. “Yeah I’d love to hit on you but unfortunately the risk of false rape accusation is too high. As a result I’m politically celibate.”

    Yes, the risk is too high, because the presumption of innocence, with a right to a trial by jury wherein the prosecution must prove each and every element of the offense charged beyond a reasonable doubt just doesn’t provide enough protection for poor widdle men just looking for a good time.

    Just WTF do you people want? Some sort of Anglo-Saxon inspired trial by ordeal of any woman who accuses a man? Come to think of it, not even that would be good enough. What you want is impunity.

    I haven’t crunched numbers, really what are the chances of your typical college boy getting accused of rape, given that rape reports on campus, true or false, are exceedingly rare.

    https://ww3.aauw.org/article/clery-act-data-analysis-2017/

    In any case, go ahead and be politically celibate. Maybe you can do something more constructive with you time than lie and manipulate women into having sex with you.

    • Replies: @Bel Riose
  220. @Vergissmeinnicht

    Here me now, believe me later:
    Kadyrov is a girlie man.

  221. @Rosie

    So 2,000 years ago some Roman aristocrats killed some babies? And that is WITH CITATIONS?

    Wow. So when all of the Chinese people killed girl babies to adhere to the One Child rule, that was so that Chinese men could enjoy child-free sex? You know, Rosie, I learn something new every time you write [your nonsense].

    Bottom line, little maggot.

    –I don’t care what happened 2,000 years ago in some villa in Rome.

    –I know that you did not say that the actual men who were enjoying the child-free sex from the prostitutes of yore killed all the babies, but instead that other men killed the babies so that those other men could enjoy child-free sex. So I’m glad we cleared that up!

    –So no, that is not special. The complex affairs of men and women in our species and other related species like the bonobo, is not for you to judge. Men like sex, women less so. Evolution has got us to where we are today. Stop messing with it because you have the “feels” about something.

    P.S., Your Daily Reading Aide: always change the words “sex trafficking” to “prostitution.” That’s what it is and always was.

    Hope this helps [you].

    • Replies: @Rosie
  222. I know all you pu\$\$ies are too timid to say it, so I guess I’ll have to say it:

    By their very nature, MOST women are an unmitigated pain in the f’king a\$\$ and, once you scratch beneath the surface, even the good-looking ones are barely tolerable

    Not to mention that when that “looker” you hooke almost inevitablly morph into loud-mouth lard-a\$\$ land-whales then humping off a cliff seems like a GREAT isea

  223. gotmituns says:
    @Rosie

    Correct, many spinsters are very friendly and many of them are lesbians as well.

  224. I know all you pu\$\$ies are too timid to say it, so I guess I’ll have to say it:

    By their very nature, MOST women are an unmitigated pain in the f’king a\$\$ and, once you scratch beneath the surface, even the good-looking ones are barely tolerable..

    Not to mention that when that when that “Iove of your life” almost inevitablly morphs into a demanding loud-mouth lard-a\$\$ land-whale, youll consider jumping off a cliff to be a GREAT idea!

  225. @Robert Dolan

    You mention Weinstein….pretty sure he actually raped at least one woman. I don’t think Bill O’Reilly raped anybody……I think the big jews just wanted him out to shut down a conservative voice.

    Weinstein probably raped a few and should get life but I would bet that most are “regret lay” type rapes.

    Basically when women don’t want to admit they banged a guy down the pole and especially if it went public.

    I would have probably believed that normal women would never do such things but I saw it first hand in high school. This girl told me about how she was raped and how awful it was. A violent rape by some out of county guy at his place.

    Later my GF laughed when I brought up the story. She said no we were there and it wasn’t rape. The friend in fact put out a couple times and wanted to go back.

    Jesus I really thought I was listening to the horrible tale of a serious felony and was thinking about calling the police.

  226. @anon

    Woman’s greater participation in homosexual tourism does nothing to dispel the impression that she has no idea what she wants. The only thing she knows for sure is that *you* had better know what she wants and that *you* had better provide it.

    Oh give me a break. Homosexual tourism for straight women that don’t like their partner? Was this a TV episode?

    This idea that women are one bad lay from going dyke is a liberal/feminist fantasy.

    I’ll let you in on a secret which is that most women don’t really like women. Most of their friendships are really just temporary alliances. Most women don’t like women and certainly don’t want to put their faces in female nether regions. They might complain about men…..a lot but that doesn’t mean they would go dyke. It’s akin to men that complain about their car but would never trade it in. I have met women that tried to switch and couldn’t do it. Not even close.

    In the 60s there was actually a movement to turn left-wing White women into full on lesbians so they would stop having sex with “the enemy” aka White devils. Well it failed miserably.

  227. Truth says:
    @restless94110

    Yeah, because all that men want was and is child-free sex. That’s why rigid marriage values ruled mankind for thousands of years: solely to give men child-free sex.

    No, Screwgie, men do greatly desire child-free sex, the reason for rigid marriage values is that that women’s fathers DIDN’T want their daughters having child-free-sex.

    • Replies: @restless94110
  228. Rosie says:
    @restless94110

    So 2,000 years ago some Roman aristocrats killed some babies? And that is WITH CITATIONS?

    Not only that, but apparently it was so commonplace that people just wrote it down in letters. I mean, I would think that if there were even a little bit of shame surrounding the practice, they would have tried to use a pizzagate-style code word or something, but apparently not.

    So when all of the Chinese people killed girl babies to adhere to the One Child rule, that was so that Chinese men could enjoy child-free sex?

    No. They could have had the child-free sex with birth control. That was so they could have a boy instead of a girl because they’re misogynist pigs like you.

    P.S., Your Daily Reading Aide: always change the words “sex trafficking” to “prostitution.” That’s what it is and always was.

    Is it “prostitution” if the “recruiters” target desperately poor families and tell them they’re looking for maids or waitresses and then lock their daughters alone in dark rooms until they agree to have sex with 20 men a day?

    Oh well I guess it’s just a “complex affair.”

    • Replies: @restless94110
  229. Truth says:
    @Mike Tre

    I’m going to invite Aldey to this thread. It sucks that Tillie left years ago. The threads where three of them they went full Valkyrie on you guys were epic.

    • LOL: Rosie
    • Replies: @Mike Tre
  230. Sparkon says:
    @Rosie

    For the bazillion time,

    There are good times, bad times, but there’s no time like the bazillion time…

    It’s interesting, but I think most men avoid these imaginary hyperbolic numbers like zillion, gazillion and bazillion, but in this case, you should use the ordinal number, and say

    “for the bazillionth time…”.

    • Troll: Rosie
  231. anon[378] • Disclaimer says:

    @John Johnson #227

    I can see why your confused.

  232. @Dave Wightman

    American women had an established traditional role, and ‘scientists’ determined that popularion would increase to an unsustainable point, therefore feminism was created.

    Nah…de Tocqueville had it right in the early 19th Century when he observed that under the conditions of equality we would grow to love our equality more than anything else–including our liberty. And here we are today–men and women–slaves, but equal.

    Feminism grew out of the love of equality, which the masses understood as “sameness” rather then political equality.

  233. @Rosie

    Not only that, but apparently it was so commonplace that people just wrote it down in letters. I mean, I would think that if there were even a little bit of shame surrounding the practice, they would have tried to use a pizzagate-style code word or something, but apparently not.

    Golly Gee! Ok, let’s see if we can help “them” out. All the men today who want to enjoy care-free sex by killing babies we will call them, plumbers. I hope that helps.

    No. They could have had the child-free sex with birth control. That was so they could have a boy instead of a girl because they’re misogynist pigs like you.

    So all of the Chinese women who only wanted boy babies are misogynist pigs? And the men? They only want child-free sex, so they forced the women to take birth control! So there were no kids born in China after the Commies took over in 1949? That is too bad. I had no idea that the Chinese population had been declining for 70 years. Due to female misogynists. Thanks for the info!

    Is it “prostitution” if the “recruiters” target desperately poor families and tell them they’re looking for maids or waitresses and then lock their daughters alone in dark rooms until they agree to have sex with 20 men a day?

    Someone [Hint: name of Rosie] has been seeing too many episodes of L&O: SVU. So, the daughters are locked in dark rooms? Why aren’t they locked in light rooms? What about pink rooms? Also, why lock them in rooms? Why not lock them into farm work for 10 cents a day in their country? Or maybe lock them into factories there so they can give the 10 dollars per week they get paid to their starving families?

    And why do they have to have sex 20 times a day? Why not 200 times a day? Or better yet, why not 4 times a day? At 100 bucks a customer that’s pretty good for a day’s pay!!

    Gee, if I was a girl with absolutely no future except for grinding poverty where I watched my mother grow into an old woman by age 35, I’d sure want to make sure that no “recruiter” took me away from that!!!

    Hmm, perhaps this will help you to understand why girls that are “rescued” from “sex trafficking” continue working in prostitution. Like the bonobo, Rosie, who get treats from their male admirers for sex, female humans like treats too. Grinding poverty? 80 hours in a factory 7 days a week? They don’t like that so much.

    Also the 20 times a day thing is nonsense. Ask any prostitute. Half your friends probably turned tricks when they were younger before they started living at the old folks’ home you find yourself in.

    They’ll tell you that 20 times a day is excessive. Made up. False. Meant to provoke the “feels” in women like yourself.

    Talk to your sisters, Rosie.

    They are doing it [turning tricks] for themselves!

    • LOL: Arminius1933
  234. @Robert Dolan

    The reason I believe most women is because there isn’t much to gain for a woman to come forward, except a lot of shame and embarrassment. One reason #MeToo is good is it encourages more women to come forward without the stigma. Almost always when one comes out, others follow, and you see the pattern of behavior by the same man, which will then save more women from becoming victims. Amber Heard and Johnny Depp are both drug addled attention seeking degenerates who deserve each other, I don’t see a victim in their case, only two willing participants. It was his own fault to leave his wife and children for a woman 23 years his junior. But of course men who lack capacity for introspection will seize upon the verdict to discredit the entire #MeToo movement.

    As always, it takes two to tango. Feminism and wokism wouldn’t have their appeal if non-whites and women didn’t feel like they were marginalized. Men, esp. white (incl. Jewish) men, have been in a position of power for a long time, and they loath losing that power, even though many have been abusing it. Women pre-feminism were like women in the Muslim world today, with zero power and have to rely on men to marry and support her.

    The first wave of feminism started in the late 1800’s to allow women right to vote. I think this is a good and fair thing, for simply treating women and blacks as fellow citizens and human beings. Those who think women and blacks/minorities vote for stupid politicians should blame our media and education, not the right to vote.

    The second wave of feminism started in the 1960’s to encourage women to get educated and have their own careers so they are not entirely dependent on those men who mistreat them, which is also a good thing. Unfortunately this wave of feminism went too far. Instead of encouraging women to uphold virtue and expect men to do the same, women are encouraged (by Jew owned media, academia and entertainment) to behave as badly as men through movies like “Revenge of the Nerds” or HBO shows like Sex and the City. Men who cheated on their girlfriends or wives were excused as “boys will be boys” while women were told we “like bad boys”, without the qualification what kind of women? Stupid ones of course. Who gains at the end of this? Licentious men who run our media, academia and entertainment. #MeToo is supposed to counter this.

    But then came the third wave of feminism which started in the late 90’s and veered into Wokism. Women are told we are equals of men in every respect and should demand equal outcome not equal opportunities. LGBTQ lifestyle, hookup culture, slutty outfits, pornography and single motherhood — all things the opposite of class and virtue, are now sold to us as “empowerment” of women. This complicates the #MeToo movement as women are now excused for behaving badly due to our victimhood status, but men are expected to be held accountable for crossing the line. It takes two to tango.

    The fact that Gen Z is having less sex is a necessary blow back, just like #MeToo is a necessary blow back for men in power behaving badly. The time has come for both men and women to stop behaving badly to stop us from going down this rabbit hole. Blaming each other is not going to help. We must each accept our responsibility for contributing to this current state of affairs, raise children who eschew pop culture and media/academia narrative, embrace responsibility, integrity and self-restraint.

    [MORE]

    My attitude on abortion is this: Although I’m a conservative on many social issues, I’m pro-choice. For various reasons: Only a very small number of women use abortion as a means of birth control. Those who have to get an abortion are usually cases of rape/incest, or for medical reasons, or do not believe they are in a position to care for a child and decide to do the responsible thing. Adoption is not an easy thing for a woman. For the rest of your life you have to contend with not knowing what happened to that child, or that someday he/she could suddenly appear in your life when you already have a family etc. Women who’ve had abortions have to live with that knowledge and pain for the rest of their lives, which in and of itself is punishment enough. Those who feel no remorse are not fit for motherhood to begin with, and their children are better off not being born because we already have enough effed up people in this world. Most criminals and mass shooters came from effed up families, we don’t need more.

    What about late term abortion? Only those out of extreme medical necessity, emotionally disturbed or remorseless would seek late term abortion. In the first case, the mother would have to live with the pain for the rest of her life, in the latter two cases, the child is better off not being born to such mothers.

    The real way to reduce abortion is by bettering our society, such that men and women become more responsible, eschew hookup culture and embrace marriage and family, not by regulating it. Those who think people would behave more responsibly if they can’t get abortion are relying on wishful thinking. Until we stop this train of degeneracy through pop culture, banning abortion will just end up with more single motherhood, welfare children growing up in broken homes, turning into criminals etc.

    I find it ironic that many conservatives who claim we need to fix society/broken families to reduce gun crime (instead of through gun control) are also staunchly anti-abortion. Banning guns and banning abortion are both quick fixes for society’s larger ills, but they eschew one while righteously support the other. Leftists do the same, they just support and eschew the opposite. Such inconsistencies are all too common in our society, both for the left and the right.

    • Agree: Miro23
    • Replies: @Robert Dolan
    , @Biff
  235. @The Real World

    I find that anyone who uses the word “problematic” or its derivatives to be a charlatan.

    They had a custom in Spain a long time ago. So what? Deformed children? Why don’t you address and fix the “problematic” custom in Muslim culture of first cousin marriage? It contributes to lowered IQ and congenital deformities and is current and ongoing.

    Bottom line: if you find yourself married to someone who the mayor has impregnated? Call him junior and move on. Out of the village. To San Francisco.

    It will be less “problematic” for you there.

    Be sure to wear a flower in your hair.

  236. Bel Riose says:
    @Rosie

    “Yes, the risk is too high, because the presumption of innocence, with a right to a trial by jury wherein the prosecution must prove each and every element of the offense charged beyond a reasonable doubt just doesn’t provide enough protection for poor widdle men just looking for a good time.”

    Gee — what a great deal for men!

    A guy who is falsely accused of rape gets to go broke paying a criminal defense lawyer \$400 / hour to defend him from the bogus rape charge — assuming, that is, that he can even come up with that kind of money in the first place. If he can’t, his fate is in the hands of an overworked, indifferent, and probably incompetent public defender.

    And if the guy is found innocent (a big if, by the way), his (female) accuser simply waltzes out of the courtroom without consequence, while the guy has his reputation ruined and is in debt for the rest of his life.

    How about this, Rosie: if a woman accuses a man of rape, and the man is brought to trial based on the woman’s complaint – and is then found innocent — the woman has to reimburse the man in full for all the legal fees he incurred in his defense.

    If she doesn’t have the cash on hand, then the unpaid amount becomes a judgment against her, which the man can enforce via levy, garnishment, or whatever other remedy the law allows.

    Fair, no?

    I haven’t crunched the numbers, but the proposal seems fair to me! After all, what are the chances of your typical female (college student or otherwise) having to pay up, given that the number of women who accuse men of rape, true or false, are exceedingly rare?

    I’m sure you’ll agree with me that this proposal is an eminently fair one!

    Now for your homework.

    You are to research collegiate sexual harassment / assault policies, including but not limited to university policies governing clams of sexual assault and rape. Report back to us in detail on the procedures used to investigate and adjudicate such claims against accused students, and be sure to answer the following questions:

    1. Who has the burden of proof in such cases — the complainant, or the accused?
    2. What is the burden of proof?
    3. Does the accused have the right to know the identity of his accuser?
    4. Can the university take any action against the accused prior to a finding of guilt?
    5. Does the accused have any right of redress against the accuser in cases where the accuser’s allegations are deemed to be meritless?

    Finally, contrast the accused’s rights in a sexual assault / rape prosecution brought by the state, with a sexual assault / rape claim brought against a student by a university.

    Report back to us on what you find!

    This exercise will help you understand that there’s a huge difference between being accused of rape by the county prosecutor, compared to being accused by a panel of professors and administrators at a college.

    Men are, of course, at risk of both. But then again, you really don’t care about that, do you? Of course not — you are a misandrist, after all.

    But plenty of young men care about it — as well they should.

    I’ve said it before, Rosie and I’ll say it again: you are a feminist lunatic, and deserve to be treated as such.

    • Agree: Arminius1933
  237. @Truth

    Troofie! What rock have you been hiding under???

    So all men do greatly desire child-free sex. But fathers do not desire child-free sex? So their daughters must only have sex to procreate?

    Well, that’s what the Roman Catholics used to decree before El Popus Cuckus took over the Papacy.

    So in other words, the main man of Western Civ for well over 1500 years said: no sex unless to make a baby, but for some reason you think that men wanting child-free care-free you’ve-come-a-long-way-baby sex decided to disobey the Church and have the sex and also kill the babies?

    Didn’t they have like the Inquisition for that? Or at least Ex-Communication?

    They had pretty strict rules back in those days, Troof. I know. History? The way it really was? You don’t care. Either does Rosie.

    Wait! I just figured it out!! You are with Rosie in the rest home she (and you) have been confined to! That’s where ya been. Ok. well is your joint manifesto done yet?

    Better finish it and send if off to Popey Pie-us, before they figure out what he really did most of his life.

  238. anon[356] • Disclaimer says:
    @Pablo

    The American indoctrination, er, education, system, coupled to a misandrist and sexist legal system, lies at the heart of the so-called “abdication” of leadership by men. I can recall 30 years ago experiencing the anti-white male pogrom within the university context: young, talented white males being passed over for internships, scholarships and research/teaching assistant jobs because they had benefited too much in the past from “male structures of power and male privilege” (even though the world these women and sayanim bitched about had already been dead for generations); young white male academics being denied tenure because it was time for someone else to reign (even if the males in question were, in most instances, conspicuously qualified and eminently accomplished); an anti-male atmosphere that vilified all young, white, non-jewish males as latent predators and rapists; absence of resources for young men suffering from mental health issues; absence of scholarships for talented white males (up to, and including, the termination of scholarships geared toward young, white males); and classrooms that were avowedly sexist and discriminatory to young men, but which were never cleansed of their PC sexism because department heads and upper administration felt that young men deserved it (even as they took money from those young men). You could physically attack young, white men, vilify them, excoriate them, smear them, and deny them employment opportunities, and championing this garbage could get you (if female) a tenure-track appointment or a promotion.

    Now, we all know about the sexism and injustice at the heart of the American legal system, so I will not repeat points here, except that even female academics (such as Sonja Starr), have commented upon it; that is how bad it is for white men in our culture. A sick, deviant society that expects young men to be breadwinners and warriors, and then denies them the skills, support, educational opportunities and employment opportunities that would make that realistically possible for millions of them. Affirmative action has always had, at is core, the targeting of young, white males – you know, the people who built the society that is currently being destroyed, and who are expected to pay their daughters’ ride through college. And white women cheered all of this on, because it was a short cut to power, and because it allowed them to get away with attacking their ex-boyfriends, or the hot jock at school who ignored them. American goy females are virtue-signaling, mischievous, wicked, narcissists whose vanity and self-righteousness have been exploited by the tribe for generations. It is like Disraeli being a favorite of Queen Victoria’s, while reviling Palmerston, because Disraeli cleverly played upon her gross vanity in a way that Palmerston did not.

    American white women are repellant. Long may they suffer.

    • Thanks: Miro23
    • Replies: @Rosie
  239. Mike Tre says:
    @Truth

    AldeN is still here. I enjoyed Attila the Hen’s rants at Derb and his wife.

    Funny they never bitch at you: a negro who thinks all celebrity women are trannies. Rosie is so desperate for allies she takes sides with a guy most likely to rape her. 🤷

    • Replies: @Rosie
    , @Truth
  240. @JMarq

    Statistically the most depressed people in Western society are 41 year-old childless and umarried women.

    Pls provide a high quality source to support that random claim.

    The vast majority of women who spend their child-bearing years exclusively in the pursuit of career and pleasure

    You mean the 20 women in America who fit that description? Why do you waste time on such a tiny segment of the population? It provides no substantial point of reference.

    The question is whether a career should be a life-defining domain.

    There is no question there. It is not for you or anyone else to decide; only the individual should decide for themselves.

    The evidence – provided by women themselves – is that this is simply a miserable, borderline insanity-inducing life trajectory for most women.

    More utter bunk. You chug too much brainless media and easily believe their manufactured drivel. The real world appears to be foreign to you.

    There are virtually no corresponding women in their 40s and 50s. Women do not do well on their own – and that is by their choice, not men’s.

    More complete garbage. LOADS of middle-aged and older women travel, worldwide. On their own, with a friend or with groups. In organized travel groups, the ratio of solo males to solo females will virtually always be about 2 versus 8 – 10. The vast majority of males simply do not travel unless with a girlfriend, wife or on a guys sporting-type trip. You simply have no clue what you’re talking about but, that doesn’t stop you. Smh…

  241. @Thinking Woman

    If you believe most women….then you are insane.

    Women are human….and humans lie.

    Clearly, you know nothing about the Depp/Heard case. I saw much of the trial, viewed a great deal of expert commentary…..Depp WAS victimized. (And I’m not a fan of Depp)

    The jury obviously understood that Heard is a big fat liar. And yes, this should be the end of metoo.

    You think that banning guns is a quick fix? For what? To enable white genocide?

    You are not thinking clearly.

  242. @restless94110

    Rancid, cranky word salad ^^^ with no useful value whatsoever. Next…

    • Replies: @restless94110
  243. Anonymous[414] • Disclaimer says:
    @John Johnson

    A lot of Unz posters depict the Jews as the intellectual basis of left but White liberal women have been taking the leadership positions.

    We live in strange times.
    1. White liberal women don’t run the Democratic party. Right now, it’s run by Obama, who controls Biden’s White house through Biden’s Chief of Staff, and under whom Blacks are supreme. Jews lost their legal/political magic sufficiently to be classified as White under the 1964 Civil Rights Act (CRA), and are now, from a legal point of view, an oppressive group rather than an oppressed group, hence out of the inner circles of the Democratic Party. Jews had a 5 decade run of luck, but they’re victims of CRA displacement and asset stripping now.

    2. “White liberal women” have said nothing about their own expulsion from reality. Officially, “Women” are anybody who claims to be a woman, and women (e.g. Rosie) seem to be fine with this. Women with XX chromosomes are officially no different from people with XY chromosomes, or perhaps superior. This is not leadership of any sort by women — it is the demotion of XX chromosome people from any chance at leadership. Athletic competition suggests that XY chromosome women are more useful than XX chromosome women, so obviously any woman chosen to lead should be an XY person who identifies as a woman.

  244. anonymous[316] • Disclaimer says:

    \$20.00 says Rosies’ BMI > 30.

  245. Rosie says:
    @Mike Tre

    Funny they never bitch at you: a negro who thinks all celebrity women are trannies. Rosie is so desperate for allies she takes sides with a guy most likely to rape her.

    When did I ever side with Truth? He is the one who sides with me, because, you know, I’m right.

  246. Rosie says:
    @anon

    Long may they suffer.

    Oh well at least you don’t make any attempt to hide your sadistic hatred of us with pseudoacademic gobbledygook like some people around here.

    Now, we all know about the sexism and injustice at the heart of the American legal system, so I will not repeat points here, except that even female academics (such as Sonja Starr),

    Muh biased courts!

    Affirmative action has always had, at is core, the targeting of young, white males – you know, the people who built the society that is currently being destroyed, and who are expected to pay their daughters’ ride through college. And white women cheered all of this on, because it was a short cut to power, and because it allowed them to get away with attacking their ex-boyfriends, or the hot jock at school who ignored them.

    Liar.

    https://www.vox.com/2016/5/25/11682950/fisher-supreme-court-white-women-affirmative-action

    • Replies: @anon
  247. Anonymous[414] • Disclaimer says:
    @JMarq

    RE: Sparta

    They produced no science, no art, no culture and were eventually defeated militarily by Athens.

    Spartans were envied by the rest of Greece and the Classical world for their society, in which people really did (for a long time) live up to their social roles. The roles were limited to keeping rule over the Helots, but, such as the roles were, the Spartans did fill them.

    Sparta was not defeated by Athens. It won the Peleponesian War, and after that it was defeated by itself, by the inability of Spartans to live outside the Spartan system. Given an Empire and the need to administer it, they fell apart inside a generation, as did the rest of Greece over a somewhat longer interval.

    Roughly, Sparta was disorganized by the same thing that took down the Late Roman Republic — returning Imperial administrators had enough money to do what they pleased. This led to conflict, which encouraged having fewer (and therefore richer from inheritance) children, and led to winners and losers. Families were ejected from the Spartan upper class, and those remaining were smaller. The number of troops Sparta could field dropped.

    The actual defeat was by Thebes, and was from fewer Spartan troops and innovative infantry tactics. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Leuctra)

    As for women not being good at heading empires, see:

    http://www.culture-shock-tours.com/blog/4-most-demonic-empresses-in-chinese-history

    Although Queen Elizabeth managed, as did Catherine the Great.

  248. @The Real World

    Men who claim moral repugnance of abortion simply make a mockery of themselves.

    Abortion is morally repugnant. A posteriori do you think it would have been better if you were aborted ? I am glad that you still live and I could exchange ideas with you.

    What is repugnant remains repugnant irrespective of its legality. To argue using dishonest tricks to determine when abortion is acceptable is rubbish. When life starts, life starts. It is as simple as that .

    • Replies: @The Real World
  249. Truth says:
    @Mike Tre

    LOL.

    Well she’d be alive. If she hung out with you, you would literally bore her to death.

    And Bro, they don’t bitch at me (much) because I don’t spend all of my time insulting women.

  250. @TKK

    The issue as regards defamation is solely “are Heard’s claims of abuse by Depp substantially true?”. If so, there is no defamation. The American judge erred, grievously, by not limiting what would be admitted as evidence to this one question. This is an inexcusable error by the judge that resulted in the opportunity to stage a free for all theatrical circus by Depp’s lawyers who first presented Depp as the victim then went on the attack to portray Heard as a violent nutcase. A jury is particularly vulnerable to this dishonest stratagem. The general public was taken in as well. The trial was a nauseating spectacle and a gross perversion of justice enabled by a blockhead judge. Depp won by his lawyers staging a Theatre Of The Totally Irrelevant.

  251. anonymous[270] • Disclaimer says:
    @Backward

    Your projection is yet another proof that women, like you, are emotional and solipsistic.

    First of all, it’s not primarily about “blaiming”, it’s just an observation that women are destroying everything. No honest observer can deny it, really. Accusing everyone as “incel” while do not offer any alternative explanation for women’s destructive behaviors don’t change the truth.

    Second, “women are emotional” does not mean that men does not have emotion. It means that when one is “offended”(like you here), most men’s primary response comes through logic, while women’s primary response is always emotion. Of course you can’t understand this, because your fragile female psyche cannot overcome your hurt “feelings” and the only thing your female brain can process is your feeling and accusing anyone who hurt your feeling as “incels”.

    > ideologies invented and enforced by men

    Feminism may invented by (jewish) men, because of course women can’t invent anything at all, but it certainly enforced through mainly unanimous female support now. And here we can see yet another proof that women are literally incapable of taking any kind of personal responsibility at all, always shifting blame to men.

    It’s really amusing that anything a female can ever come up with is literally always somehow related with sex, like your “incel” “empty bed” examples. Sex and projection. If you sincerely believe that women are not more emotional compared to men, then you are too dumb to discuss any abstract concept(because you certainly don’t understand about what it means to be emotional), or you’re too far distracted from reality that you’re not different from that trannies.

    • Replies: @The Real World
  252. Ktulu says:
    @Vergissmeinnicht

    Religion, as in tradition, honoring our forefathers and securing the existence of our people and a future for it’s offspring, that is male religion. That is not the core of any religion you can find near today’s main stream in the west.

    Believing in a supernatural power that is going to fix your problems, that is feminine. Men fix their own problems or die trying. Women get a man to do it. God is the man that women believe will do the impossible. He won’t, he does not exist.

    • Replies: @Anon
  253. Rosie says:

    Gee — what a great deal for men!

    A guy who is falsely accused of rape gets to go broke paying a criminal defense lawyer \$400 / hour to defend him from the bogus rape charge — assuming, that is, that he can even come up with that kind of money in the first place. If he can’t, his fate is in the hands of an overworked, indifferent, and probably incompetent public defender.

    Please, don’t shoot your mouth off about things you know nothing of. Prosecutors are not eager to make fools of themselves by wasting time and money on unwinnable cases with no merit. If a brings a case to trial, it’s because he believes he will likely be able to prove the case beyond a reasonable doubt.

    How about this, Rosie: if a woman accuses a man of rape, and the man is brought to trial based on the woman’s complaint – and is then found innocent — the woman has to reimburse the man in full for all the legal fees he incurred in his defense.

    If she doesn’t have the cash on hand, then the unpaid amount becomes a judgment against her, which the man can enforce via levy, garnishment, or whatever other remedy the law allows.

    Fair, no?

    Absolutely not. You don’t get “found innocent” in criminal court. You get found “not guilty.” And there is no justification whatsoever for imposing special burdens on rape victims as opposed to the victims of any other crime just because the prosecution fails to prove its case beyond a reasonable doubt. That you would even propose such a thing reveals that you care nothing at all about women’s interests. Some private cause of action for flagrant abuse of process, where the plaintiff has the burden of proof may be appropriate, however.

    This exercise will help you understand that there’s a huge difference between being accused of rape by the county prosecutor, compared to being accused by a panel of professors and administrators at a college.

    It’s not my job to do your research for you. I’m sure due process is significantly less extensive (and expensive) on a college campus than in criminal court. I would guess that the complainant bears the burden of proof, probably by clear and convincing evidence, and almost certainly has the right to know the identity of the accused. And I don’t know why you would think that the university could take action against the accused before a finding of guilt, except to the extent that it is necessary to protect the public. (In criminal court, that’s what pretrial detention is for.) I already dealt with your silly claim that women should be punished for good-faith rape reports.

    Of course, your asinine post missed the point entirely. Rape reports are exceedingly rare on college campuses. Therefore, false rape reports must be at least as rare. Even if due process on campus is wholly inadequate, the fact remains that a random college boy has a very low risk of even being accused, let alone sanctioned, for rape by a university, because women rarely make the accusation to begin with.

    If you weren’t such a hateful jerk, you would at least be willing to give credit where it is due.

    Men are, of course, at risk of both. But then again, you really don’t care about that, do you? Of course not — you are a misandrist, after all.

    No, I really don’t GAF. Making the pump and dump 100% risk free for men isn’t high on my list of priorities.

    • Replies: @anarchyst
  254. Ktulu says:

    The feminine outrage will continue at pace for a while. They will cry and squirm but someday soon, when the economy breaks down, when the corporate-government complex cannot sustain itself, when the whole decrepit mass tumbles down, women will suddenly want to be good housewives.

    • Agree: anarchyst
    • Replies: @guibus
  255. The collective insanity of our women is perhaps no more perfectly illustrated in the massive numbers of American women who are rabidly pro-abortion. If women do indeed possess nurturing qualities when it comes to babies and children, why are so many of them willing to terminate their pregnancies — even to the point of supporting partial-birth and after-birth abortions?

    Well, how many women have you actually known, dear author?

    You see, a woman is nurturing when she has a child. Even you apparently understand that (probably from all the fairy tales you heard as a child, because you don’t seem to have had much experience with real women.) But when she first learns she is pregnant (you know, maybe when her menstrual period is late — or maybe you don’t know) she has a decision to make.

    This is HER decision, and THIS is what makes her special.

    Abortion within the first two or three months is perfectly normal and acceptable, because it affords a woman the opportunity to first learn that she is indeed pregnant and then to decide if she wants to bear a child — all before it is indeed a child!

  256. anon[232] • Disclaimer says:

    @Dave Wightman #66

    “American women had an established traditional role, and ‘scientists’ determined that popularion would increase to an unsustainable point, therefore feminism was created. The idea was that women would work and therefore abandon the idea of producing a comuunnity of offspring.”

    If that was the reason for creating feminism, what was the reason for creating immigration?

  257. Dream says:

    Imagine repeating these points in 2022.

    This is what our American women have morphed into. This is what ‘woke’ feminism does to the women of any society stupid enough to tolerate it. Is it any wonder why so many American men are turning to Asian and Eastern European women who possess the slimness, femininity, grace, and traditional values they want?

    Well, American “conservative” men are not known for their brains or knowledge of other cultures. Those Asian and Slavic women who marry Western men look down on their own men – very honourable female behaviour.

    Feminism and liberalism exists in every corner of the globe. Non-Western cultures are transforming much more rapidly then Western ones. There is a reason anti-femininism is a mass movement in South Korea. Many Muslim countries today have more women in their legislatures than USA did in 1990.

    In other words, when women rule a nation’s most important institutions — especially if its foundation are ideologically ‘woke’ — it will inevitably self-destruct. Consider, for example, Germany’s former Chancellor, Angela Merkel, and the problems she saddled her nation with because of her bleeding heart for Islamic migrants. In Sweden, 47% of its Riksdag (parliament) is comprised of women. Switzerland’s Federal Assembly has 41.5% females. It should surprise no one that these same countries also have extremely liberal social policies and permit large numbers of Islamic people to immigrate.

    The Windrush in Britain, Hart Celler Act in USA, Turkish gastarbeiters in Germany did not involve women.

    Switzerland has the most restrictive immigration standards of any Western country, and has probably the lowest percentage of non-whites.

    • Agree: Sarah
  258. anonymous[270] • Disclaimer says:
    @Rosie

    From your own link:

    The educational “gaps” in childlessness and in family size have narrowed in the past two decades, but they do persist. The more education a woman has, up to a bachelor’s degree, the less likely she is to become a mother. And among mothers, those with more education have fewer children than those with less education. For instance, just 13% of moms lacking a high school diploma have one child, while fully 26% have four or more, while among mothers with a master’s degree or more, 23% have only children and just 8% have four or more.

    Do you have some kind of dyslexia, woman?

    the most highly-educated women are the most likely to get and stay married

    Again, your link does not support your assertion at all.

    There is noone more miserable than an old bachelor.

    Where is your beloved “data”? Oh, I found it:

    https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/high-octane-women/201109/meet-the-least-happy-people-in-america

    And the unhappiest profile?:

    Female
    42 years old
    Unmarried (and no children)
    Household income under \$100,000
    In a professional position (doctor, lawyer, etc.)

    I understand it hurts, woman, but old bachelors are like the happiest people in the universe compared to spinsters, and your desperate crying on some internet forum cannot change the fact. Most importantly, an old bachelor at least in theory can still have children at any time, but spinsters are not, simply because of biology.

    Women at least have friends

    lmao what do you mean? Do you want to say bachelors do not have friends? or have less friends than spinsters? lol

    Look at mirror. You yourself are the most convincing proof that an old spinster is the most miserable pathetic losers on earth, woman.

  259. anonymous[270] • Disclaimer says:
    @Rosie

    Because you can’t manipulate math olympiad or chess, but you the hell *can* manipulate school enrollment and the whole education system in favor of females, dumbo. lol

    https://atavisionary.com/how-standardized-testing-undervalues-men/

    and one more, if you want a “source” from females:

    By the way, this book is written by a feminist woman.

    Oh, and one more, the IQ gap between the sexes is “small” only because it too has been manipulated in favor of females(and still women cannot beat men, lmfao)

    “Most standard tests of intelligence have been constructed so that there are no overall score differences between females and males”

    From Intelligence: knowns and unknowns. American Psychological Association. http://www.gifted.uconn.edu/siegle/research/correlation/intelligence.pdf

  260. @Rosie

    What do you want to say by the “self-reported attractiveness and messaging”? Women more often manipulate and exploit simps more than approach to men who they are actually interested in? And men approach more honestly to the actual potential partners, instead of manipulating and exploiting lesser women? lol What a retarded argument. But you’re a woman, so I can’t expect anything more.

    “More educated”

    You mean more student debt and less money, right? It doesn’t sound much as “marrying down”, lol. Modern educayshun, yeah.

    Although to be fair, despite women are hypergamous, it’s kinda pointless topic because whether or not women are hypergamous, women should be put in their place anyway.

  261. Whoever it is that controls ‘Third Wave’ feminism has hit the jackpot. That a group of so-called ‘feminists’ could support a manufactured hysteria like the trans-gender lunacy, that is essentially and intractably misogynistic through and through, is utterly dumbfounding.

  262. @restless94110

    I supposed you’d prefer ‘troublesome’.

    • Replies: @restless94110
  263. anthill says:

    White women definitely love being sexually assaulted by them big black bucks. I have told this tale elsewhere, but I recall a virtue-signaling white woman when I was in college who would inveigh against white men, including her father, every chance she got. She entered into a relationship with a “black stallion” in her junior year, because she wanted to be with a “real man”. Well, I guess she forgot that she wasn’t dealing with a member of the honor society anymore: one night she made the mistake of saying no to lavtronious, and he put her in the hospital. See, black males take a very different view of male/female relationships than white men (or most white men) and they tend to get punchy when a “lady” says no. Frankly, I hope the brothers keep punching, and kicking, too.

  264. @Alrenous

    The b1tchiness is a worldwide phenomenon these days.

  265. Dream says:

    The main problem which Whites face is racemixing with non-Whites, which could very well end the White race within a few generations. Wokeism is not just a Western problem, but a worldwide one, and exists even in third world shitholes.

    • Replies: @Realist
  266. GMC says:
    @Altai

    MK Ultra was taken to an entirely higher level and the Sheep never even noticed. Good thought out post Altai.

  267. @Rosie

    What complete and utter nonsense. There is noone more miserable than an old bachelor.

    You mean an old spinster, right? lmao most men are happy or at least not miserable with their single life, but women are not. There is no women on earth who are childless and not miserable in their 40s and afterward. A spinster like you desperately “wanting” for an old bachelor to be miserable like you doesn’t change the reality that old childless women are the most miserable and pathetic losers in the world. Your emotional seizure-like reaction about the topic alone tells a lot about this reality.

    Women at least have friends,

    lmao this is the second most laughable claim I ever see only next to the previous claim about bachelors. Women and friendship are like jews and honesty. I mean women and honesty. It’s almost a literal contradiction.

  268. @Rosie

    Oh, and one more:

    their antisocial, degenerate lives.

    Put aside your imaginary “wealthy degenerate bachelors” myth which only exists in your brain(if there is any, lol), nothing is more “antisocial and degenerate” than typical modern females’. Promiscuous, unmarried, childless, abortion(aka baby murdering) loving whores, and later became a bitter internet spinsters who lives off the state welfare program, like you. But unlike your imaginary “wealthy bachelors”, the females are not even satisfied in their antisocial, degenerate lives, so internet feminists like you.

    A feminist supposedly opposing jewish world order is the most absurd logical contradiction ever existed in history. You might as well support jewish banking system and claiming to be opposing jews. Seriously, it makes much more sense than supporting feminism and “opposing” jews at the same time. But your female “brain”(lol) is too susceptible to feelings to objectively see the truth, of course.

    • Replies: @Jay Fink
  269. Sarah says:
    @anarchyst

    One of the most poisonous “siren songs” that white women succumb to is when a black man states: “You won’t date me because I’m black”…

    That’s one of their tricks. In such a case, the best thing to do is not to answer and leave.
    The more you answer them, the more you will get stuck and the harder it will be to get out.
    With this kind of animal, it is best not to even argue.
    From my own experiences, or those of my friends or relations, I can speak about it with full knowledge of the facts.

    • Replies: @Truth
  270. guibus says:
    @Ktulu

    absolutely, when tshtf, females will ask for protection of men, regardless of how they’ve been brainwashed and how much they have destroyed men, because they will shamelessly swallow their pride for saving their arses.

  271. Just passing by to watch our resident “female?” Troll “Rosie the Riveter” have one of her histrionic mental meltdowns. Rosie knows a lot about incels, but I know a lot about crazy cat ladies… Who loves ya Rosie! 😘

    • Replies: @Alrenous
  272. “The most notable modern feminists were Jews such as Betty Friedan, Naomi Klein, Gloria Steinem, and the late Supreme Court judge, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, can be named among them.”

    Let’s not forget Bella Abzug!

  273. @Hitch

    J. Edgar Hoover and the FBI must have known about that Midnight Climax operation and allowed it to carry on for so long. Mind you not a bad idea but an utterly despicable operation: experimenting on tricks lured by prostitutes. Not as if the punters would have complained since they could have been threatened with arrest for engaging in illegal activity: soliciting and consorting with prostitutes. The prostitutes’ customers could also have been persuaded into committing further criminal acts such as robbery, assassinations, etc. by blackmail without even the need for drug induced hypnosis, and the only way out for them was suicide.

    • Replies: @Hitch
  274. Left out of the numerous ways in which men & women differ is IMO the preeminent, Darwinian one: men compete to show who is better, then often go have a beer after the competition. Thus the victors get to select the woman they want, while retaining the friendship required to work together to hunt and to protect the tribe. Women compete by destroying each other. Once the other is destroyed, the remaining woman will be chosen and able to pass on her genes.

    This is evident to anyone who was has any experience in women managers. Women HATE working for each other, HATE being managed by other women. The archetype of two women wearing the same dress is indicative. Two men would say, “Cool threads, Dude,” and go get a drink. Two women would be utterly humiliated, trash each other, and go home.

    • Troll: The Real World
  275. Mananon says:
    @traducteur

    Women with traditional values exists in higher percentages down here in the south and around the Midwest. Unfortunately the dynamic is shifting as peoples from blue states/cities, especially from the Northeast, move away from the places they destroyed with their leftist ideologies (e.g. New York, Massachusetts) to areas down south where the cost of living is lower, the air is cleaner, and the economic potential is much higher, but they forget to leave the politics that ruined their states and cities behind. They have come in large swathes over the last 2-3 decades and many solid red states are now purple or even blue.

  276. The above is cross-cultural, as well. The Chinese character for “trouble” is two women under one roof.

    • LOL: Sarah
    • Replies: @Sparkon
  277. Alrenous says: • Website
    @Vinnyvette

    Every woman is a troll. Everything they do and say is calculated to acquire attention. They don’t care if it’s true or not and they laugh at you if you treat their words like statements or arguments.

    They’re all starved for attention, but some are more starved for attention than others.

    I don’t understand why attention is supposed to be so great. It would seem that harvesting negative attention should decrease genetic fitness, rather than increase it. Most puzzling.

    • Replies: @Vinnyvette
  278. Jewesses infect White women with the feminist virus and who in turn infect women the world over.

    • Replies: @Malla
  279. @The Real World

    Your reply is problematic. Next…

  280. @mulga mumblebrain

    You say troublesome; he says problematic. Let’s call the whole thing off.

  281. Craig Nelsen:
    “Nah…de Tocqueville had it right in the early 19th Century when he observed that under the conditions of equality we would grow to love our equality more than anything else–including our liberty. And here we are today–men and women–slaves, but equal.
    Feminism grew out of the love of equality, which the masses understood as “sameness” rather then political equality. ”

    No. Feminism was not around in the 19th century, so you are comparing apples to oranges. And you cannot prove anyone is ‘equal’. If we were equal, then men pretending to be women would not be ruining women’s sports. If we were equal, then rich politically connected people would go to jail for their crimes, while normally they skate. If we were equal, then black people would not be getting welfare, affirmative action forced hiring, and preferential treatment. If we were equal, everyone’s IQ would be the same. If we were equal, then conservatives would not be vilified and persecuted by the government and the media. I could go on, but you get the truth.

    the US government and the CIA invented feminism as I explained, it was intentional social engineering to decrease population and destroy the nulcear family model. And it suceeded:

    https://www.chicagotribune.com/opinion/commentary/ct-gloria-steinem-cia-20151025-story.html

    And the rest is history!

    • Replies: @Corvinus
    , @Arminius1933
  282. anarchyst says:
    @Rosie

    You are missing one important point. Most criminal cases do not go to trial and are “plea bargained”…
    This in itself s detrimental to the innocent man accused of rape as the charge will be reduced to “attempted rape” with “time served” (awaiting trial), a hefty probation time and being registered on a “sex offender” list for life.
    The innocent man might just take the “deal” to avoid further incarceration.
    In any case, the innocent man always loses…

    • Replies: @Rosie
  283. Xavier says:

    This is a well written article but it’s missing one vital piece – feminism’s appeal to the average woman.

    Every mass movement has two components – Ideology (worldview) and mass appeal. Feminism’s ideology, which resolves around social engineering, has been discussed many times so let’s instead focus on mass appeal. The latter appeals to personal self interest and sometimes the more baser instincts of people. Women are far more opportunistic than western societies give them credit for and feminists implicitly understand this. So what does feminism offer the average woman? Quite a bit actually. Abortion, child support, meetoo (power without accountability), affirmative action, and most importantly – validation (the only currency that matters to women outside of money). As someone rightly observed – feminism is a union for women, but the union dues are paid for by men. Feminists have successfully legislated aspects of hypergamy and reshaped our culture around female worship and validation. Feminism offers women a world where their reckless shenanigans have no consequences because the social and financial costs are absorbed by the male tax payer. In any society outside the west, women who spend their youth in promiscuity would be shamed and possibly even destitute. In the west, there is welfare and a culture of validation which provides these skanks with an endless supply of pliant men who will happily raise Tyrone’s bastard spawn.

    Women by nature are more base than men. Philosophy, especially moral philosophy, have exclusively been the domain of men with women contributing virtually nothing to those endeavors. Thus women lack the ability to comprehend ideals in the same manner as men. However, women are intuitively aware of how ideals affect men and thus are able to mimic idealism to more effectively manipulate men. Women will bandy about words like “equality” and “fairness” while enacting legislature that is authoritarian, grossly unfair, and hostile to men.

    Since feminism appeals to base instincts (encouraging women to think through their vaginas) it is then hardly surprising that western women are shockingly deficient in higher virtues such as humility, etiquette, grace, and gratitude.

    • Disagree: Corvinus
  284. anarchyst says:

    An adult college woman has consensual sex with someone she considers “a good catch”.
    Things don’t work out and she doesn’t want to be reminded of her sexual “exploit” with this former “good catch” by having to see him on campus, so she files (false) rape charges against him with the university a few months later.
    At the least, he gets expelled from the institution. More severely, he gets criminally charged with rape and does time in prison as a result.
    She is no longer reminded of him and no longer has to see him on campus and thinks nothing of the false charges.
    Justice? I think not…
    This occurs more often than most people realize.
    Think about it…

    • Troll: The Real World
  285. Corvinus says:
    @Dave Wightman

    “the US government and the CIA invented feminism as I explained, it was intentional social engineering to decrease population and destroy the nulcear family model“

    Just because you explain doesn’t mean it’s accurate or based on historical facts.

    • Replies: @Dave Wightman
  286. @Charles Martel France

    Abortion is morally repugnant.

    Have you shared that view with men who risk creating unintended pregnancy by inserting their body fluid where it can do just that?

    Have you said that to men who are pressuring a women they impregnated to get an abortion? (I’m thinking I know the answer to both.)

    Charles, do you realize that, every day, people all around America make the decision to let a living human die? They decide when life ends. They either don’t provide that person with medical care or they cease that care and in hours, days or a week that person dies. But, oddly, I imagine that you’re okay with that. How do you resolve that hypocrisy?

    Do you also grasp that America routinely sends citizens, in the prime of their lives, off to die in wars of conquest and for economic reasons not for national defense. Does that weigh on your conscience?

    Btw, do you know what percentage of pregnancies self-terminate?

    • Replies: @PegC
  287. @JimDandy

    I think a lot of the lezboness in the data is just that unattractive, fat women who can’t find a man have thrown in the towel and “identified” as lesbian or bi. Now that it’s acceptable or even preferred in urban areas why would they not? I don’t see any attractive full or part-time lesbians out in the real world.

    • Replies: @JimDandy
  288. @anonymous

    …does not mean that men does not have emotion. It means that when one is “offended”(like you here), most men’s primary response comes through logic, while women’s primary response is always emotion.

    ROFL! That is 100% complete nonsense. Yet, you believe it and that is the truly irrational and scary thing. Every single year in America there are thousands of people murdered, untold numbers of men, women, children and animals assaulted and maimed, property destroyed, people raped, ETC. and all of that is because of the unhinged, utterly irrational emotions of men.

    Men have no corner on logic or reason, whatsoever. However, they do mostly own violence which occurs because of unregulated emotions. You have some much deeper thinking to do about the real world.

  289. Hitch says:
    @Commentator Mike

    Yes, it was all very Satanic, or even Masonic. Just like Pedo Island today.

  290. Mark Belk says:

    I have always said, /Viggers, women and children are all the same. They cannot and will not function properly without responsible White male supervision.

    • LOL: Sarah
  291. “The question naturally arises why women are so seemingly susceptible to such radical social and political movements? Why do women so often comprise the shock troops and first ranks of any Leftist political protest?”

    Has anyone considered the possibility that it actually might just be petty jealousy? That women take a look at all the amazing things men have accomplished,from putting human beings on the moon to harnessing electricity or inventing computers and they’re desperate to put a W on the board there somewhere,and being retarded,think the only way that they can do that or the best way to do that is just to go after men themselves?

  292. Sparkon says:
    @Alexander Scipio

    The above is cross-cultural, as well. The Chinese character for “trouble” is two women under one roof.

    Actually, the cunning linguist’s friend Mr. Google Translate tells me the Chinese hanzi characters for trouble are 麻烦, pronounced maafan, but there are five other expressions for trouble, including 问题, 烦恼, 困难, 患难, and 毛病. Maybe Jonathon Revusky will stop by to shed further light on these characters.

    But the character that looks something like two women two trees under one roof 麻, can mean numb, hemp or even cannabis.

    By itself, 林 means woods or forest.

    木 by itself means tree or wood, and of course, no woman can dangle like that.

    • Replies: @Truth
  293. @Xavier

    Philosophy, especially moral philosophy, have exclusively been the domain of men with women contributing virtually nothing to those endeavors. Thus women lack the ability to comprehend ideals in the same manner as men.

    Oh good grief, I shake my head at such simplemindedness.

    How does it not even occur to you that, historically, women were prevented from contributing to many facets of life? Do you live so inside your own cranium that something so obvious eludes you?

    Women do not lack the abilities; they are catching-up from centuries from being suppressed of developing themselves more broadly. You might want to ask yourself why the male set was so threatened by them to do such.

    Your last paragraph isn’t even worth addressing, it is so epically inane. It seems you live under a rock.

  294. PegC says:

    This author is exactly correct IMHO. I’ve been a Lefty for a long time, now a Righty for the same number of years. I was a psych major (Dad wanted me to be an engineer like he was and I wish I had). Women screw everything up. It looks like, but for a few old fossil males in the Deep State, women and their screwy, anti-humanity ideas are steering us right off a cliff. Life under tyrannical men surely was horrible, but at least half of humanity revered ourselves instead of preaching nihilism – which LGBTetc. part is but the T part is most of all. Girls are being groomed into “becoming boys”; boys into becoming girls. Neither of which can actually happen but am I the only one to see that all this leads to NO children being born to these coming freaks?? We’re looking at most babies being born in petri dishes in a few decades if not far sooner. No one will have any investment in being good people or good parents and role models.

    I pray, PRAY I am wrong. And there are many people fighting these nihilistic ideas.

    • Replies: @PegC
    , @RockaBoatus
  295. PegC says:
    @The Real World

    I used arguments like yours way back in my feminazi days. I’m happy I came to understand just how nihilistic these ideas are in practice (they sound soooo virtuous in one’s head) and gave all that up. It’s clear a lot of people hate humanity and hate themselves. We live in a truly psychotic world.

    • Replies: @Rosie
    , @The Real World
  296. PegC says:
    @PegC

    I screwed up one line. It should read, “It looks like, ALONG WITH a few old fossils in the Deep State…” etc. Mea culpa.

  297. After reading your article I have to question if you’ve been out and about listening to any women who are doing their best to hold their families together? The ones who get up everyday and keep the clothes washed, the house reasonably clean and tidy, feed their children, and referee through the daily disagreements of their household? The ones that do their best to point their children to the path of a life well lived?

    Your charts may seem like documented truth to you (I assume college educated with a scowl for the “less thans” . . .) but life in the real world is a far different planet than the wide brush you are painting females “everywhere” with. The women I rub shoulders with, whether in the neighborhood or on the job, aren’t easily swayed. They have a good head on their shoulders and make a multitude of decisions everyday that impact everyone in their family or their workplace. Are they 100% correct on every decision? Of course not, but higher education sometimes makes common sense look like the gold standard.

    • Replies: @RockaBoatus
  298. Rosie says:
    @anarchyst

    The innocent man might just take the “deal” to avoid further incarceration.
    In any case, the innocent man always loses…

    It’s like this. The defendant gets an attorney, at public expense if necessary, unlike the victim, who does not get one. (She’s not even a party to the case, but a mere witness, and has no power to block outrageously lenient plea deals FYI.) If the prosecutor cannot prove its case, the attorney will advise the defendant not to take the plea deal. Public defenders are bound by the same damned ethical obligations as any other lawyer, and are often better at it because it’s all they do. (If you don’t believe me, ask a lawyer.) In any event, if you’re worried about bad attorneys, then worry about bad attorneys. That is a bigger issue that affects all criminal defendants equally.

    Going around demonizing women, suggesting that we constantly accuse innocent men of rape out of vindictiveness, even going so far as to demand special punitive measures against women who dare to accuse a man, is f’ing uncalled for. It is a reflection of your male chauvinist sense of entitlement that you believe that rape should be singled out for especially burdensome prosecution. Indeed, it rather tends to vindicate the radfem contention that you care more about men’s freedom to go around pumping and dumping risk-free than you do about women’s right to be free from sexual coercion.

  299. Rosie says:
    @PegC

    Oh look another female impersonator calling people names and failing to actually address their arguments.

    According to PegC, the women who defend themselves are “self-hating,” while the women who join the choir of male chauvinist bashing are…what? Self-loving?

  300. Truth says:
    @Sarah

    LMAO!

    According to this thread, a white woman might be running out of options.

    • LOL: Sarah
  301. Truth says:
    @Sparkon

    It is actually the character for “chaos” that is two women under one roof.

    • Replies: @Sparkon
    , @Truth
  302. @Wasn't Born Yesterday

    Thanks for your comments and, yes, I have been observing and listening to American women for decades. My thoughts about them didn’t develop in a vacuum nor overnight. But I can’t deny trends that I’ve seen for a long time, and now increasing in intensity over the past eight years. I try to read widely as well so that I’m not guilty of reaching conclusions based on limited or biased information.

    Obviously, not everyone is going to agree with me and I’m okay with that. Yet at least I’ve made the effort to be reasonably objective. I don’t know how one can stay attuned to the news and social media and not see how hysterical great numbers of our women have become. It should be obvious to those who are impartial and discerning.

    One further point. My criticism is NOT directed at all American women. I’ve repeatedly made it clear that I’m referring to “many” and “even far too many women,” but definitely not all women. I explained that there exists “plenty” of women who are reasonable, intelligent and discerning.

    I believe men and women have been designed to complement each other. I think we do best when we stay within our natural roles and foster them to the best of our abilities. When we move out of those same roles, a plethora of problems start to manifest and that’s what we are seeing today.

    • Replies: @Sarah
  303. @PegC

    “Neither of which can actually happen but am I the only one to see that all this leads to NO children being born to these coming freaks?? We’re looking at most babies being born in petri dishes in a few decades if not far sooner. No one will have any investment in being good people or good parents and role models” – Well said, and this is precisely what it will lead to.

    One doesn’t need a graduate degree nor even a high degree of intelligence to discern that all of this social engineering will lead to less White children being born. And those that are will be deeply conflicted as their natural instincts and proclivities collide into the ‘woke’ Utopian ‘values’ they will be fed their entire lives.

  304. @Xavier

    Thank you for your insightful comments. I don’t disagree with you at all, but it’s difficult in such an article as I have written to address every conceivable angle. My article generally assumes feminism’s appeal to the average women, although I did not develop some of the finer points you mentioned.

    In sum, contemporary feminism allows women to be reckless. It allows them to take no personal accountability for their actions, particularly when it comes to murdering their babies, blaming society’s deepest problems on White males (‘the patriarchy’), and being dependent on the government for their most basic needs (healthcare, childcare, etc.).

    Feminism provides endless excuses for the personal failure of women. Whether it’s gender discrimination, sexual harassment, male dominance in most industries, male chauvinism, the patriarchy, or whatever, it’s never or rarely the fault of women. In a society that gives them every opportunity in the world to succeed, including a host of laws that afford them employment preferences, there still remains massive numbers of American women who believe they are being ‘oppressed’ merely because of their gender. We need to call out such insanity.

    • Replies: @The Real World
    , @Xavier
  305. Bel Riose says:
    @Rosie

    It’s like this. The defendant either goes broke hiring a decent criminal defense lawyer for what will be the most important court appearance of his life…OR….relies on a busy, overworked, burnt-out and indifferent public defender, who can only manage his case load by pleading out 90% of his cases.

    Public Defenders are NOT better at criminal defense work than an experienced private criminal defense lawyer. The fact that you can even suggest this proves you have no idea what you are talking about.

    The (alleged) victim, on the other hand, gets a free lawyer — the prosecutor — to pursue her claim, backed by the unlimited full power and resources of the state.

    “Indeed, it rather tends to vindicate the radfem contention that you care more about men’s freedom to go around pumping and dumping risk-free than you do about women’s right to be free from sexual coercion.”

    Actually, it does no such thing. It simply suggests that women who make false rape claims should be punished.

    And “pump and dump” does not equal sexual coercion. It merely means a man had consensual, commitment-free sex with a woman. What’s wrong with that?

    Rape claims should unquestionably be subject to especially burdensome prosecution.

    • Agree: restless94110
  306. @Corvinus

    Not only did the CIA orchestrate the killings of JFK, RFK, and they attempt on Reagan’s life, they insituted feminism for social engineering and population control(and to destroy the nuclear family). The CIA also invented Modern Art for their own nefarious purposes.

    https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/modern-art-was-cia-weapon-1578808.html

    And these are all in fact matters of historical record. And to quote you: ‘Lol, you’re all talk.’ In fact, you can do nothing other than utter one-liners. You might want to retire in disgrace because the Big Boys are talking here, and you have no Big Boy pants to wear.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  307. @John Johnson

    Exactly, the trendy dilettante female get to be empowered by association with the more radical elements of woke folk. I have always held a similar view of the abortion issue. Most women will endorse the pro-abortion stance but very few of them will ever consider an abortion, but the stance will give them power over the male world. “Don’t eff with me, I have the life & death of your offspring my pocket.

  308. Jay Fink says:
    @spacewanderer

    One disagreement with this. By far and away it is single mothers, not spinsters, who are on government welfare programs.Few childless people qualify, although many go on disability. I would also say it is the government programs themselves that are a main factor behind the high illegitimacy rate. Note before LBJs war on poverty the traditional family was by far the norm, even among blacks.

  309. @PegC

    You make no valid comment. Resolve the hypocrisy I correctly pointed out.

    How is it okay to decide when another living person dies?
    Why is it fine to send living Americans off to die in wars of conquest and for profit?

  310. Che Guava says:
    @Getaclue

    The entire point of phenomena as you describe is simply an exercise in spite.

    Really, although I think he did comment here as rockaboatus some time ago, he isn’t using that u-name here now.

    TOO is the better place.

    All of the major ‘feministt’ theorists are Jews, with the exception of Nazi collaborator, not that I am saying that was a bad thing, per se, Simone de Bovine, and later, Mary Daley, strangely supported by elements of the Catholic in U.S.

    Otherwise, exclusively Jewess leadership, usually by women in a kosher marriage with a well-off fellow Jew.

  311. Well an article with fair and well written points yet again turns into another gender war on Unz.

    I wouldn’t spend too much time on feminism.

    The trendy idea that a man can cut his wang and take some pills to become a woman has divided the female Democrat base. The MSM has tried to keep a lid on it but this is really an issue that is actually pushing away even long time feminists. I guess some women aren’t convinced that a woman in a dress peeing standing up next to them is actually a woman. What a bunch of fascists.

    Let the left push too far on this one. It’s a poison pill. I browsed the comments on an east coast newspaper article on trans swimmers and they were doing constant scrubbing to remove all the comments from angry liberal women. The majority of the women were not on board with the idea. And actual women with real vaginas that can make real people. They were removing comments every 5 minutes.

    • Thanks: Johann Ricke
  312. Sparkon says:
    @Truth

    It is actually the character for “chaos” that is two women under one roof.

    Where’s the beef? Please post the character you’re describing, and please, never make arguments of assertion, i.e. an argument without anything to support it, other than you said so.

    According to Google Translate, the hanzi characters for chaos are 混乱 (Hǔnluàn), and also 混乱 and 凌乱.

    There are no radicals or components in those hanzi containing the radical character for woman 女士 or female, which is 女.

  313. @Clonemaster

    The solution is not only point out and denounce the myriad problems and the origin of those problems, but to get organized with like minded patriots and deliberate action to change the course of events, while the numbers of alienated and otherwise healthy Americans are still sufficient to reverse the mephitically putrid status quo.

    Join the American Freedom Party.
    Amfreeparty.org

    Paulcraigroberts.org

    Occidentalobserver.net

  314. @RockaBoatus

    From Comment #305

    I try to read widely as well so that I’m not guilty of reaching conclusions based on limited or biased information.

    That is the problem, right there. You READ and that’s where you get your views and biases? You are lost in academics and media manipulations and mistakenly believe it is the real world.

    I noticed this trend some years ago amongst male commenters on another website I regularly read. They spoke in generalized ways about women that had little accurate reflection in reality. I kept wondering, ‘who are these aliens and where do they get their inaccurate info?’ I eventually recognized what it was. They were extrapolating what they see on TV, in movies and on the internet to be primarily representative of American life. And they believe their own ridiculous fantasies.

    An example on here is commenter Robt Dolan. He seems to have been obsessed with the degenerate Heard/Depp trial and, absurdly, it makes sense to him to cast wide aspersions on whole groups of people based on those two freaks. That is an epic fail.

    Rocky, you gave it all away by mentioning your weak info basis. You lack real life interaction and sourcing and, instead, buy into manipulated media and political narratives to support what you WANT to believe.

    Comment #300 from Wasn’t Born is the reality. If you got out into the actual world, observed clearly, asked questions and listened closely and objectively you would find the majority of women to be as described in that comment.
    ———-

    But, how about you balance this by showing some objectivity and writing an article on the continued epic physical violence of men and the tremendous toll it takes on our society? The murders, assaults, rapes, child pedo activities, property destruction, etc.

    Pls include in the article the astonishing degree of irresponsibility evidenced by men in abandoning children that they father. Perhaps you know something about that?

    • Replies: @RockaBoatus
  315. MJA says:

    This is an excellent article and offers great examples of how women clearly are a destructive force within our nation.

    Kudos to the author for putting his/her finger on the problem and articulating this so well.

    Thank you so much for this great insight in this significant problem.

  316. Xavier says:
    @RockaBoatus

    A lot of feminist insanity is grounded in confirmation bias. They seek out misogyny under every rock, nook, and cranny and they inevitably find it. Consider this article – https://www.fsg.org/blog/can-snow-clearing-be-sexist/

    There could be endless reasons for why main roads were prioritized over sidewalks and bike lanes, but to demented feminists, it’s a patriarchal conspiracy. That’s the only explanation that makes sense to them. But there is a method to their madness. Without the constant supply of grievances, feminism becomes irrelevant. Feminist thinking works by trying to make reality fit the model, instead of the other way around. Instead of constructing models that better fit the data, they perform mental gymnastics trying to make reality validate their models and biases. We would normally laugh at such lunatics if they didn’t wield coercive institutional power while whining about how oppressed they are.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  317. anarchyst says:
    @Rosie

    You are in denial by claiming that female vindictiveness does not occur.
    I personally know men who have been victimized by the system and were forced to “take pleas” in order to avoid long prison sentences. In every case, the prosecutor was a man-hating woman who would insist that “the woman is always telling the truth”, even if the (supposed) act took place six months or even a year ago. In both cases that I am aware of, no proof was required. The woman’s word was sacrosanct.
    As to your statement that “the defendant gets an attorney” is laughable. Most young men do not have the funds to pay for one; the public defender gets the job. As to public defenders, in most jurisdictions it is comparable with the military draft where attorneys admitted to the “bar” are selected to serve as public defenders for a period of time. Almost often, they are overworked and have huge caseloads which make it difficult to effect a proper defense for their clients. Hence, the “plea bargain” gets used.
    No, Rosie…I ain’t buying your claim…
    As an aside, for a woman to claim “rape”, she should have 24 hours to make the claim. This foolish “date rape” concept where charges are made six months after the act takes place is just judicial criminality.

    • Replies: @John Johnson
    , @Rosie
  318. @Dave Wightman

    Welfare programs are a colossal fraud and theft of wealth and resources committed against the American taxpayers by their own government. In the name of veracity, however, majority of the indolent parasites who are collecting it are actually white trash degenerates. If you include the degenerates who are in the employ of government agencies (e.g., police) the numbers of white degenerates and the cost accrued to the taxpayers increases exponentially.

    • Replies: @bwuce wee
  319. 3 says:

    There was a sociologist or historian from long ago who wrote a book claiming that the more chaste the women, the more successful the society. He basically said everything you say here without the woke additions.

    One has only to watch American Ninja Warrior to starkly see in plain, understandable contrast the physical difference in men and women who are made to run the same tracks. It is a rare woman who can finish even the first course. And she is celebrated like a true stud and hero. Sure, an individual woman can best an individual man on the amount of course they finish, but a man (in fact many men) will always beat that woman.

  320. Jay Fink says:
    @The Real World

    I hate violent men, wish prison sentences were much longer for violent crime. That being said my problem with your argument is that many (probably most) men are not violent. Men commit the vast majority of violent crime but it is a relatively low percentage of men who engage in it. Women being emotion based is more universal than violence is for men.

    • Replies: @The Real World
  321. @The Real World

    “That is the problem, right there. You READ and that’s where you get your views and biases? You are lost in academics and media manipulations and mistakenly believe it is the real world. I noticed this trend some years ago amongst male commenters on another website I regularly read. They spoke in generalized ways about women that had little accurate reflection in reality” – With due respect, you didn’t quite cite my words in their entirety: “I have been observing and listening to American women for decades. My thoughts about them didn’t develop in a vacuum nor overnight. But I can’t deny trends that I’ve seen for a long time, and now increasing in intensity over the past eight years.”

    I have been observing, listening to, reflecting on feminist women, and the current ‘woke’ trends for decades. I have been interacting with them as well. In fact, my former career (now retired) required me to interact with a good many of them over the years. I’ve seen up-close and personal just how feminism destroys lives and families. If you think I’ve ONLY read about these things and never bothered to seriously engage these women, you are sorely mistaken.

    • Replies: @Rosie
  322. JimDandy says:
    @Semi-Employed White Guy

    I think a lot of the lezboness in the data is just that unattractive, fat women who can’t find a man have thrown in the towel and “identified” as lesbian or bi.

    Well, yeah, but to be fair there are also a fair number of pretty good looking chicks who had at least one threesome back in college primarily to turn on the alpha male they desired. That counts too, thank God!

  323. @anarchyst

    I’ve seen three fake rape claims.

    Two in high school and one in college.

    All 100% false. No one went to jail fortunately.

    If the woman isn’t covered in scratches from trying to escape then the court should be very skeptical.

    This happens more than people realize. The woman is embarrassed by cheating or shagging someone of low status and calls it rape. I would be very cautious about sleeping with a married or engaged woman for this reason. Some women will go to extreme lengths to maintain a marriage or engagement.

    As to your statement that “the defendant gets an attorney” is laughable. Most young men do not have the funds to pay for one; the public defender gets the job.

    Public attorneys read your guilty plea for you.

    A man in that situation would be better off borrowing money if needed to hire a real attorney.

    • Replies: @Rosie
    , @Gett
  324. @Jay Fink

    It’s irrelevant that most men aren’t physically violent (we think). The point is there is far too much brainless, immature violence and death caused by that gender and it takes a tremendous toll on society. It’s a massive problem that people DO NOT truly even acknowledge, let alone address. Instead they whine about women being able to vote and define their own lives, etc. Those are completely misplaced priorities.

    It’s only fair to point out that your comment is ENTIRLEY typical. The first male reaction to assuming any responsibility is to deny it, ignore it, deflect from it, blame someone else for it, etc.

    Just read comment threads anywhere on articles where there is plenty of blame or responsibility on the part of males and then read the comments. Do so objectively and you will see 100 to 1 comments like you made. Men hate being called-out on their transgressions. It seems that it’s a maturity issue and one of self-entitlement. Both of those need to change.

    • Agree: René Fries
  325. @anonymous

    Holy Scriptures taught people that centuries ago… When you remove women from their natural position – it courts disaster. Unfortunately in modern times – because some societies did abuse women – people desecrate the Holy Scriptures which teach women should be obedient to either their father or their husband. A father or husband who loves that daughter or wife will treat them well… But the lies of Satan teach that men are all “mean and abusive”… Hence today’s results.

    • LOL: The Real World
    • Replies: @Rosie
    , @Kali
  326. I would add that the presence of large numbers of women at Marxist and feminist political rallies serves also to disarm any political opponents who may be in attendance. Who would, after all, like to be surrounded by throngs of hostile and screeching women? Any male who sought to engage them would be drowned out with a barrage of epithets and the vilest profanity. Today’s loud-mouthed ‘pussy hats’ are not ashamed to say what they really think. Even if a melee broke out, what man would want to be filmed fighting a woman?

    Interestingly, the Left– or the anti-right– has made the same point about the European right, particularly Marine Le Pen and Pia Kjærsgaard. Women soften the message and make it more palatable.

    Charismatic female leadership and gender: Pia Kjærsgaard and the Danish People’s Party

    From Le Pen to Alice Weidel: how the European far-right set its sights on women

    An unlikely match: Women and the far-right

    Women leaders in Europe are always (from the) right

    In the English-speaking world, women are too shrill and unfeminine for this to work as well. Still, I was more than happy to vote for Michele Bachmann, in person, at my caucus in Minnesota.

  327. @JimDandy

    From what I have read – people are having less sex overall regardless of orientation…. Feminism combined with social media and the internet and lower testosterone in males…

  328. Rosie says:
    @John Johnson

    A man in that situation would be better off borrowing money if needed to hire a real attorney.

    Oh STFU, John. You literally have no idea what the fuck you’re talking about. You’re entitled to your opinion, but you are not entitled to run your mouth about things you literally have no knowledge of whatsoever.

    Two in high school and one in college.

    All 100% false. No one went to jail fortunately.

    John, you can’t refute the documented fact that rape accusations are extremely rare with your totally unverifiable b.s. anecdotes. This is patently obvious to anyone who is remotely open to a rational discussion about the topic.

    The interesting thing is, you don’t even have a decent anecdote. All you have is a claim that three boys you know were accused of rape and that nothing happened to them. Color me shocked! Moreover, you somehow have come to know that these allegations were 100% false. Apparently, whatever adjudicatory process was used here is not only infallible, but very fair indeed to men.

    Yet, you offer this ridiculous own goal as evidence to support the manosphere hysteria about “false rape allegations.” Really, you should be ashamed.

    • Replies: @John Johnson
    , @Anonymous
  329. Rosie says:
    @RockaBoatus

    I’ve seen up-close and personal just how feminism destroys lives and families. If you think I’ve ONLY read about these things and never bothered to seriously engage these women, you are sorely mistaken.

    It’s true in your mind.

  330. bwuce wee says:
    @Arminius1933

    uh-oh- here we go with trying to make a point with statistics. unfortunately for you, you do not understand how statistics work. they are designed to obfuscate and prove either side of the argument. so without further ado- here we go:

    1. i never claimed ‘all blacks are on welfare’, nor did i claim ‘no whites are on welfare’. and a caveat- many hispanics are considered by the government to be ‘white’, and also many many mixed hispanic/black get miscategorized- intentionally!
    2. you must take into account what the ethnic population totals are, what percentage of the population is on welfare, what % of that is black, and what % of that is white, BEFORE you try and play the statistic game. so you already lost, bucko
    3. welfare stats (59 million welfare recipients that are part of at least one of the programs like SNAP.)- “The majority of SNAP recipients, 38.6% to be precise, are Caucasian. African Americans are the second biggest group, accounting for 24.8% of the recipients, followed by Hispanics who make up 11.5%. Asian Americans account for 2.9% of food stamp recipients, while Native Americans account for 1.2%.”

    4. “The U.S. is now 57.8% white (231.9 million whites in US (2020)), 18.7% Hispanic, 12.4% Black(41.6 million total black in US (2020)) and 6% Asian. Some of those changes, Jones said, can be attributed to improvements to the survey. The white, non-Hispanic population is still the largest racial group in the U.S.”

    so quick fuzzy math tells us that:
    a. 59 million welfare recipients
    b. approx 22 mill are ‘white’
    c. approx 29 mill are ‘black’

    so whites are the majority population wise, but they are not the majority of welfare groups!
    so very simply: you are dead wrong. there are around 22 mill whites on welfare, while there are 29 mill blacks on welfare. you see they play with statistics specifically so you do not know what is happening. blacks are being subsidized. they are being paid to breed more welfare recipients. and that means the budget gets bigger every year. see how that works. now you know why they don’t want blacks- or anyone for that matter- learning math. because when you know math, you can figure out the LIES!

    AND JUST FOR GRINS- WHAT ETHNIC GROUP IS BARACK OBAMA? after all, he is 1/2 white! but he pretends to be black!

    • Replies: @Arminius1933
    , @Truth
  331. @The Real World

    Every single year in America there are thousands of people murdered, untold numbers of men, women, children and animals assaulted and maimed, property destroyed, people raped, ETC. and all of that is because of the unhinged, utterly irrational emotions of men…

    …brought up without fathers.

    The mad, emotional leftism of postmodern women is a very recent phenomenon, worthy of more study than it now receives. Women had long been recognized as more conservative voters than their menfolk. They voted for Nixon, not Kennedy, and it’s been claimed that in the UK, the Tories owe every one of their 20th-centuries victories to women. (Men built the Nanny State!)

    Women were more likely to see through the assertions of the suffragists than were their dunderheaded men– to the point where suffragists themselves made sure women weren’t permitted to vote on their own suffrage.

    In the US, women heroically stopped the Equal Rights Amendment dead in its tracks when the male establishment had almost had it ratified. The bulk of the anti-abortion movement is female, and, after a fifty-year slog, may finally have something to show for it. Hefner is turning in his grave.

    Women are the force behind anti-statist homeschooling and, of all things, resisting the unnecessary circumcision of boys.

    • Thanks: Carolyn Yeager
  332. @Realist

    That’s why God made sex so pleasurable. Families broke down because of promiscuity… One woman annoys you so you get pleasure elsewhere. Even polygamy was better than promiscuity. Men had to (still exists in some societies) still remain responsible for their wives… Not like the coworker who just wants a romp after work before she goes home to watch tv and eat her leftovers from the restaurant she went to with her friends.

  333. Rosie says:
    @anarchyst

    You are in denial by claiming that female vindictiveness does not occur.

    I didn’t say female vindictiveness doesn’t occur. I said that the system is already so protective of the accused that you have no cause for hysteria.

    I personally know men who have been victimized by the system and were forced to “take pleas” in order to avoid long prison sentences.

    Of course you do.

    In every case, the prosecutor was a man-hating woman who would insist that “the woman is always telling the truth”, even if the (supposed) act took place six months or even a year ago. In both cases that I am aware of, no proof was required. The woman’s word was sacrosanct.

    You’re a damned liar.

    As to your statement that “the defendant gets an attorney” is laughable. Most young men do not have the funds to pay for one; the public defender gets the job. As to public defenders, in most jurisdictions it is comparable with the military draft where attorneys admitted to the “bar” are selected to serve as public defenders for a period of time. Almost often, they are overworked and have huge caseloads which make it difficult to effect a proper defense for their clients. Hence, the “plea bargain” gets used.

    Oh look a manosphere maggot banging on about things he knows nothing about. That is complete hogwash. There is nothing remotely comparable to any sort of draft for public defenders. The defendant has a Constitutional right to more than just a warm body. He has a Constitutional right to effective assistance of counsel, and failure to provide such is grounds for relief, yet another layer of protection for the defendant.

    https://www.criminallegalnews.org/news/2021/oct/15/study-shows-public-defenders-outperform-court-appointed-private-attorneys/

    As an aside, for a woman to claim “rape”, she should have 24 hours to make the claim. This foolish “date rape” concept where charges are made six months after the act takes place is just judicial criminality.

    This is why ignorant laymen like you should STFU about legal procedures. You are clueless about the outrageous miscarriages of justice that often result from extremely rigid rules like this. You also fail to appreciate that long delays in reporting a rape are going to be very prejudicial to a victim, such that a prosecutor is only going to bother if he or she has very good corroborating evidence. A long delay is just one more fact to be taken into consideration, and it will often be decisive.

    Of course, I haven’t even seen any evidence that reports of rape are particularly likely to be delayed. Are they? Have you even bothered to research the issue? Lemme guess. Your roommate’s cousin’s brother knows a guy who….

    To sum up: There is no evidence whatsoever of any epidemic of false rape allegations, let alone unjust prosecutions or penalties resulting from same. Out of desperation, the manosphere maggots impugn the entire justice system as hopelessly corrupt, though for some reason they care about this only insofar as it effects rape defendants. Everyone else who is accused of a crime, even murder, can go pound sand. To support their absurd claims, they cite anecdotes that the rest of us are just supposed to take for granted. Believe men! they say. Recognizing that anecdotes aren’t very persuasive, they then proceed to make up stories about a supposed draft for public defenders, hoping noone knows any better.

    Seriously, I just don’t know what to say. I clearly haven’t persuaded anyone here, but I do think I have demonstrated that manosphere creeps are totally impervious to reason and evidence on this issue. And they say women are hysterical!

    • Replies: @anarchyst
  334. bwuce wee says:
    @JimDandy

    i have had many many acquaintances(co-workers) over the years who are gay and lesbian. there are stereotypes such as, women who hate men, gay men who want to be ‘in the closet’ for various reasons (parents, job, etc.,) and even have pretend girlfriends called FAGHAGs. and i observed some important facts:

    1. lesbians despise and revile ‘bi’ women. they cannot hate them enough. they call them FENCE-JUMPERS. they despise heterosexuals- they call them BREEDERS. they despise lesbian couples who use male sperm to get pregnant- they call them TURKEY-BASTERS. they are a bunch of HATERS!
    2. LESBIANS IN A RELATIONSHIP ACT OUT TRADITIONAL MALE/FEMALE ROLES, AND THAT INCLUDES MALE CHAUVANISM. that means, they dominate, browbeat, and even physically hit the female partner if they do not conform. They basically act exactly like the jealous guy jerk husband. believe it. if you are in a commited lesbian relationship, you had better NOT flirt or fool around! and if you fool around with a man? better go into witness protection! this is direct personal observation of real relationships.
    3. not all female impersonaters or transvestites are gay.
    4. gay men who desire to appear ‘straight’ despise ‘queers and queens’, because they see this as an affectation to draw attention where they do not want it to be drawn. it is a betrayal to the closet!
    a caveat, obama is an old school gay like this- he stays so much in the closet that he cannot let his spouse(micheal) admit that he is a man in drag! and he is directly behind the new ‘turn america gay’ agenda!
    5. so you see, this supposed ‘community’ is actually made up of HATERS who hate each other AND hate ‘hets’ (heterosexuals, or to us, normal people).
    6. now i cannot speak to the new trans movement, because i am not currently keeping up with any of those old acquaintances since the lockdown, but i would wager that there is a whole lot of hate directed to these pretend trans people because instead of coming out as a gay man, they claim they ware now somehow magically transformed into women by their 3 wishes. and it is likely the same for lesbian, who think a woman claiming to be a man is a betrayal of their inherent lesbian womanhood. so transGENDERS are likely reviled by both gay men and lesbian women. but that is merely my conjecture from knowing these people in the past. i hope this helps you grasp the fact that there is no sense of ‘community’ in the LBGQT ‘community’. only a banding together of people who agree to vehemently HATE HETEROSEXUALS.
    from my direct observations, the gay community is a giant group of HATERS. oh, and don’t think they don’t hate kids BECAUSE THEY HATE KIDS. they call them bRATS!

    • Replies: @John Johnson
    , @JimDandy
    , @Anon
  335. Rosie says:
    @showmethereal

    people desecrate the Holy Scriptures which teach women should be obedient to either their father or their husband.

    And here’s why it is so absurd when rabidly antifeminist men claim to not hate women. Evidently you do hate women, because you think we are so wicked that we must obey someone else rather than follow our own conscience.

    I look at it this way. If men no longer have to eat their bread by the “sweat of their brow,” then I don’t have to obey my husband. Fortunately not being misogynist pig, he doesn’t expect that of me.

  336. @Reg Cæsar

    The mad, emotional leftism of postmodern women is a very recent phenomenon, worthy of more study than it now receives. Women had long been recognized as more conservative voters

    A bit of myth and fact.

    Single White women are one of the most reliable constituents for Democrats.

    They put in Obama and nearly Hillary.

    Married women supported Trump but only outside the cities.

    White women are more likely to believe that race needs to be “fixed” by the government and that the police were the cause of the mostly peaceful protests.

    Female nature again trying to emotionally placate everyone instead of trying to determine what is true or lawful.

    I used to run in liberal circles and the educated liberal female position was consistently if race exists then we need to lie about it. The men er I mean boys in man size bodies were more likely to accept race on a logical level but were fine with the circus if it mean getting closer to the panties of the women. It never worked for them. The women always had non-liberal boyfriends.

    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar
    , @Rosie
  337. Anon[181] • Disclaimer says:

    Brainwashing explains women’s support of abortion and their increased numbers identifying as gay or bi.
    But allowing Muslim refugees is not that. Muslim refugees are the best thing to happen to Germany and Europe. No longer can the US claim arrogantly that it’s a nation of immigrants unlike Europe and therefore superior. It’s false and pure propaganda that all these refugees are fundamentalist fanatics. Yes they may be part of criminal gangs, but that just makes them typical western youth!

  338. Sarah says:
    @RockaBoatus

    I believe men and women have been designed to complement each other. I think we do best when we stay within our natural roles and foster them to the best of our abilities. When we move out of those same roles, a plethora of problems start to manifest and that’s what we are seeing today.

    I agree👌👍

  339. @Rosie

    A man in that situation would be better off borrowing money if needed to hire a real attorney.

    Oh STFU, John. You literally have no idea what the fuck you’re talking about. You’re entitled to your opinion, but you are not entitled to run your mouth about things you literally have no knowledge of whatsoever.

    That’s common opinion and you know it.

    Public defense attorneys are failed private attorneys. Yes I’m sure there is a good one somewhere but the rule remains. No one wants to take a pay cut to work for government and deal with riff raff clients that are guilty 99% of the time.

    You would be nuts to take one on a rape case. Absolutely out of your mind. They are overworked and your rape case will just be one in a stack of many. They will push for a plea bargain because they will assume you did it and that is their main job. Get all these guilty POSs to plea bargain to save the state money from trials.

    Go back to defending women. That is at least viable. Even public attorneys wouldn’t defend their profession.

    John, you can’t refute the documented fact that rape accusations are extremely rare with your totally unverifiable b.s. anecdotes.

    How exactly would I refute that if I think the system is wrong most of the time by letting a woman’s word exist as sole evidence? By using statistics from the system?

    It’s like telling someone to prove that race exists by using Sociology sources.

    This is one of the reasons why I don’t think men should celebrate casual sex or singleness. There are some very unprincipled women out there and far more than liberals and Christians want to believe. Both groups *want to believe* in a moralized image of women that is separate from evolution. Both apply wishful thinking to women and want to believe that all the world’s problems are really just from the baser gender. We have two religions that don’t want to face evolutionary leftovers.

    I am a family oriented man and I have still managed to run into some very nihilistic women. Really quite unnerving actually. So yes I have witnessed 3 cases of fake rape accusations. The determination of the women to lie was disturbing.

    • Replies: @Rosie
  340. @bwuce wee

    Unlike many here I have actually been around gays in the city through a previous job and the more I interacted with them the less I believed in liberal depictions . Your observations are rambling but have some very valid points that show actual experience.

    lesbians despise and revile ‘bi’ women. they cannot hate them enough. they call them FENCE-JUMPERS. they despise heterosexuals- they call them BREEDERS. they despise lesbian couples who use male sperm to get pregnant- they call them TURKEY-BASTERS. they are a bunch of HATERS!

    I would add that in general they hate everyone. They gossip about each other and flip out if even a whiff of a man comes along. Well aren’t they “born that way” so there is nothing to worry about, right?

    They are also far more consistently dyke looking than on TV. The lipstick lesbian exits but is rare.

    You are right that lesbians use men to get pregnant. Average working lesbians are not paying for 10k fertility treatments. Most have had sex with a man at some point so doing it again for a kid isn’t out of the question. Their lesbian identity has more to do with hating men and society than anything else. It’s really a butch dyke club. I suspect quite a few bang a man here or there on the side and never talk about it. Well the ones that can attract a man anyways.

    not all female impersonaters or transvestites are gay.

    Also weirdly true for drag queens but I’d still put them in the questionable end of the pool.

    gay men who desire to appear ‘straight’ despise ‘queers and queens’, because they see this as an affectation to draw attention where they do not want it to be drawn. it is a betrayal to the closet!

    We called them straight-gays for lack of a better term. Gays that try to act straight or think they are some higher mix. I find them to be really annoying. They will act straight but can’t help edge into queer stuff. For example talk about fixing cars to start with and then make weird comments about porn or something. I would take the unapologetic faggot in social company if I had to choose. At least there isn’t any confusion.

    now i cannot speak to the new trans movement, because i am not currently keeping up with any of those old acquaintances since the lockdown, but i would wager that there is a whole lot of hate directed to these pretend trans people because instead of coming out as a gay man

    Trans are mostly loners that are hated by everyone. The idea that they all hang out together is a myth. The trans I saw were trying to attract straight men or other trans. They really creep me out. Most have a very weird vibe.

    • Replies: @bwuce wee
  341. Anonymous[174] • Disclaimer says:
    @Alrenous

    As if? Oh wait. About that.

    What do you mean?

  342. Gett says:
    @GMC

    “It’s Saturday Night Live in America – every night”

    yeah, a joke that is not funny

  343. Gett says:
    @John Johnson

    mattress girl was celebrated

    amber heard was bottle raped

    the duke lacrosse stripper

    Kobe’s victim’s multiple semen underpants

    how about ol’ Mike Tyson?

    and the rape that made Sharpton famous?

    maybe we should adopt islamic society standards? if a bitch goes outside without full coverage and a male family escort, she’s train ready

    • Replies: @Rosie
  344. Anonymous[182] • Disclaimer says:
    @karel

    Not quite, as these are anything but babies, rather a tissue ranging from a blastocyst to an embryo.

    That’s not it. The women involved usually think of the entity aborted as a baby, and often have severe depression and regret afterwards. Women have abortions because they believe they could not successfully raise the baby, and they regret it. Women vote for abortion because they do not want to die with the child, or have to watch the child die.

    • Disagree: The Real World
    • Replies: @Sarah
  345. Anonymous[182] • Disclaimer says:
    @Rosie

    You’re entitled to your opinion, but you are not entitled to run your mouth about things you literally have no knowledge of whatsoever.

    Rosie, mentalist and arbiter of entitlements. What a person!

  346. Rosie says:
    @John Johnson

    Public defense attorneys are failed private attorneys. Yes I’m sure there is a good one somewhere but the rule remains. No one wants to take a pay cut to work for government and deal with riff raff clients that are guilty 99% of the time.

    Meanwhile, here on planet Earth, public defenders offices get like 500 applications for every job from struggling solos who get tired of scrounging for clients, not knowing where their next meal is coming from, trying to pay the office rent, the malpractice insurance, secretaries’ salaries, etc all while trying to squeeze blood from various turnips that wouldreallyprefernot to pony up. As I said, just stop disgracing yourself by shooting your mouth off about things you know nothing of.

    You would be nuts to take one on a rape case. Absolutely out of your mind. They are overworked and your rape case will just be one in a stack of many. They will push for a plea bargain because they will assume you did it and that is their main job. Get all these guilty POSs to plea bargain to save the state money from trials.

    Shut your damned mouth. You have no business attacking the integrity and professionalism of attorneys, especially when I posted, above, evidence that public defenders routinely get better outcomes for their clients than successful private attorneys.

    How exactly would I refute that if I think the system is wrong most of the time by letting a woman’s word exist as sole evidence? By using statistics from the system?

    You’re asking the wrong damned question. Why are you trying to refute a proposition that, so far as you know, may well be true?

    Now, your claim that a woman’s word can be the “sole evidence” on which to base a rape conviction is just silly. Seriously, let go of your prejudices and just think about it for half a second. What part of “beyond a reasonable doubt” do you not f’ing understand? Any attorney that can meet that burden with nothing but the alleged victim’s say so is superhuman. Indeed, so much so that Imma go ahead and assume such an attorney doesn’t exist.

    Is it theoretically possible that some man somewhere might be wrongly convicted of rape? Yes, but WTF would you like society to do about that? Sailer’s Type 1, Type 2 error analysis is instructive here. Our justice system is already based on the idea that it is better that 10 guilty men go free than that 1 be punished unjustly. What does that number look like for you, John? 100, 1,000, 1,000,000? Just what power of 10 are we talking about here?

    • Replies: @John Johnson
  347. anarchyst says:
    @Rosie

    I’m going to take it a step further…
    If a woman wants to abort her pre-born child she should have to get the father to “sign-off” on the pre-born child.
    Since it “takes two” to procreate, fair is fair…
    Chew on THAT…
    lol

    • Agree: showmethereal
    • Replies: @The Real World
    , @Rosie
  348. @Reg Cæsar

    (Violent men were)

    ..…brought up without fathers.

    That is an astute observation and likely has some merit.

    But, it doesn’t account for the violence throughout history which has been ongoing, repulsive and extremely damaging to individuals, families and nations. As has the unwillingness of males to own it or call it out. Instead they whine like victims about women. What does that tell you?

    You are one of the few level-headed and practical male thinkers on here. Yes, quite obviously males are who has laid the groundwork for most of what is happening in America; that is clear. But, don’t tell the whiners, they’ll screech, deny it and call you a name (because they’re so logical and rational….LOL!!)

    The reality is, I can’t help but wonder if RockyBoat is paid to write stupid, divisive articles like this that serve no valid purpose. There are yo-yo’s all over media who are doing so. The intent is to further divide the country and people fall for it. I mean look at his handle, even, it’s a tell.

  349. Anonymous[182] • Disclaimer says:
    @Xavier

    We would normally laugh at such lunatics if they didn’t wield coercive institutional power while whining about how oppressed they are.

    We are not properly considering the social construct nature of sexual identity.

    First of all, the “women” who make rape claims are just social constructs. If the “man” in the case identifies as a “woman”, then who should be believed in the rape case? The “woman” or the “woman”?

    One might have assumed that the “man” was a “man” when the offense occurred, but that’s “assuming gender”. The “man” doesn’t have to do any specific thing, to include letting anybody else know, to identify as a “woman”. In fact, the attempts to castrate children in the public schools assume that most “trans” “men” and “women” have no idea that they are really what they are unless trained professionals tell them that they are really “trans”. If the Court commits “gender assumption”, and refuses to believe the “woman” who denied rape, then the Court’s actions should obviously be reviewed and quite likely reversed. At a bare minimum, the convicted “woman” should, as per precedent, be sent to a women’s penitentiary (thus bringing new meaning to the word “penitentiary”, and thus overturning some of the obsolete social forms, not to mention some of the prisoners),

    So, like the person who married “him”self in order to minimize “his” tax bill, there are depths to this “trans” business that have not, thus far, been considered here.

  350. Rosie says:
    @Gett

    the duke lacrosse stripper

    Funny you mention that.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mike_Nifong

    You see, here in the real world, as opposed to the imaginary one that you manosphere creeps live in, there are real consequences for prosecutorial misconduct.

    maybe we should adopt islamic society standards? if a bitch goes outside without full coverage and a male family escort, she’s train ready

    Your honesty is refreshing. Good luck convincing Mr. Rosie. Like he doesn’t have anything better to do on a Saturday morning than tag along with me to the grocery store.

    • Replies: @The Real World
  351. @The Real World

    “The reality is, I can’t help but wonder if RockyBoat is paid to write stupid, divisive articles like this that serve no valid purpose. There are yo-yo’s all over media who are doing so. The intent is to further divide the country and people fall for it. I mean look at his handle, even, it’s a tell” – Well, what can I say, but that you discovered me! Just don’t tell the government the boat loads of money that the ‘Ministry of Divisiveness’ is paying me.

    • Replies: @The Real World
  352. @anarchyst

    Good grief, what an imbecile.

    In many cases, WHO do you think pressures her to abort the fetus? WHO, Einstein?

    And, in the age of DNA where his fathering can be proven and thus he can be held legally and financially accountable, what do some men do to the women they carelessly impregnated who refuse to get an abortion? Tell us….

    • Replies: @Rosie
    , @anarchyst
    , @Bel Riose
  353. Rosie says:
    @anarchyst

    Anarchyst:

    When you lose the argument and make a complete fool of yourself, change the subject.

  354. Controse says:

    This is one long, wordy ain’t-it-awful moan. Assertion after assertion without reference to evidence. We are witnessing the inevitable decline of a successful civilization. Successful societies always end with self-destructive excess. America is the most successful society in human history. Our search for self-destructive excess is running short of targets. Murdering the next generation in the womb for decades is not excessive enough to bring about our doom. We have had to turn to making ones genetically determined sex open to question. We have turned a corporate celebration of childhood into a corporate destruction of childhood innocence. The rise of feminism is not the problem. The disappearance of assertion of masculine prerogatives is the problem. If a subset of women are offended by masculine prerogatives men should respond “tough.” But they haven’t so here we are blaming that subset for our societal woes. In America all the existential problems have been solved: Food, Energy, Health, Shelter, Safety. What is left is the pursuit of self-destructive decadence. It has always been so.

    • Replies: @RockaBoatus
  355. Rosie says:
    @The Real World

    That is an astute observation and likely has some merit.

    Don’t be fooled about Reg Ceasar. He is a regular fist-shaking reactionary chauvinist like most of the other men around here. He’s just a little bit more polite about it.

    You see, everything is women’s fault all the time under all circumstances. If it is not immediately apparent how this is so, the reactionaries will be glad to enlighten you.

    You see, Reg’s innocuous-sounding comment about criminals being criminals because there was no father in the house was a subtle jab at single mothers.

    When men abandon women and children, it’s not their fault. It’s the woman’s fault for having picked the wrong guy, you see. If we always picked the right guy, our men would never abandon us. Every family would be perfect and intact. That being the case, there will be no crime and we’ll all live happily ever after.

    So you see, even though men commit almost all the crimes, crimes is all women’s fault.

    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar
  356. @Corvinus

    Another female victim theory, lmfao

    So your claim is that women exploiting men and destroying traditional marriage and gender norm is perfectly fine, but if men don’t just get victimized by vicious wahmen(which is virtually 100% of them)’s psychological manipulation, but react to it, then it is evil and ‘contribution to the fall of Western Civilization’?

    Western Civilization truly deserves collapse, it must be destroyed to the ground, given that so much simps and pussy worshipers still can’t see the truth of women to this day. You are the worst enemy of western civilization, the retarded right-wing male feminists, not the so-called ‘Pickup Artists’.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  357. @RockaBoatus

    I did discover you. It wasn’t difficult – you aren’t very opaque.

    You’ve known a couple of uber feminist types, have read and watched far too much bogus, manipulated, agenda-serving media and decided to believe all that dreck amounts to a hill of beans. It’s nonsense.

    As an aside, I had dinner earlier with a middle-aged woman who has nearby female friends, sisters, cousins, nieces, sporting pals, etc. She’s been around women all her life (as have I) and I told her about this hyperbolic and silly article. I asked her, “Of your decades of knowing a wide group of women, how many have you come across who are rabid, femi-nazi types?” She tossed her head back and waved her hand and said, “Hardly any. I’d put the percentage of women like that in America to be in a similar range as the LGBTQ types. Which is to say not many. The media exaggerates both of their numbers drastically.”

    She totally nailed it and that has been my experience too. And I’ve lived in many more places than she has but, same experience.

    So, Mr Rock-the Boat (for \$\$ – not from the Govt) – when will you be posting your article about the huge price individuals, families and the country pays because of the unhinged, violent nature of too many men? You have FAR, FAR more facts and evidence to substantiate that article. Next week?

    • Replies: @RockaBoatus
    , @Bel Riose
  358. Sparkon says:
    @Truth

    Oh, I see. Thanks. You threw me off with the (under one) roof bit.

    Google Translate (GT) is having a little trouble with 奻 (nuán) as it gives the English meaning as Xiu [?], but your Wiktionary page says it means 1. quarrel, dispute or 2. stupid, doltish, foolish

    Another hanzi/kanji with three female (女) components is 姦 (jiān), which GT says means “evil,” while another source says it means “fornicate/rape” in Chinese hanzi, and in Japanese kanji, 姦 (kan) is the F-word , according to GT.

    So I guess at least it keeps us on topic.

  359. @Rosie

    …here in the real world, as opposed to the imaginary one..

    Yes, that is a massive problem! Every single day, on a few websites, I read comments from people who spout, as fact, media propaganda or something they simply made-up. They actually believe it and don’t even understand how it got into their head. It’s just, somehow, true. Lol…

    When you try to show them that facts and reality don’t support their assertion, most often, they devolve into petulance or double-down on the original bogus claims. Smh, and some of them are raising children.

    Yes, you can see why I use the handle that I do.

  360. @Rosie

    To men, they sell nation-wrecking individualism as true masculinity. (Strong, independent men don’t need no tariffs or immigration restrictions.)

    There has never ever been something even remotely resembles this kind of slogan ever. Are you schizophrenic, woman? ‘Strong independent men’? You’re just butthurt for the fact that ‘stronk independent wahmen’ narrative being mocked, so you has come up with some imaginary, nonexistent schizo slogan which nobody has ever heard anywhere something even remotely like that, just to make the false claim of ‘equivalency’ between men and women. Much more women are pro-immigration than men, and both free trade and immigration restriction has never ever been bundled up with ‘masculinity’, let alone the bogus nonexistent fake slogan ‘strong independent men’ which does not exist and was totally counterfeited by you alone.

    You just replaced ‘women’ by ‘men’ in the phrase ‘stronk independent wahmen don’t need no~’, because you are just butthurt for being mocked by your own ‘strong independent’ and that’s all feminist can do anyway, just replace ‘women’ with ‘men’ or ‘men’ with ‘women’ anywhere. Seriously, Your claim of ‘masculinity being bundled up with free trade and immigration for the sake of propaganda’ is so schizophrenic that it’s somewhat amazing you can come up with this kind of bogus hoax theory.

    But you’re women, so you can just lie about everything without any hesitant. Lying is like breathing for women, and women’s biggest strength is that they can actually believe their own lies, like you.

    Finally, your given statistics clearly has some serious problems, whatever it is, given that it claims only 5.64% of overall white population are concerned with white identity/solidarity. It’s obviously too low than reality to say the least. For example:

    https://www.amren.com/features/2021/09/amren-poll-white-americans-waking-up-on-race/
    White Support for Conservative Racial Positions
    My race is important to my identity (agree) 45.8%

    • Replies: @Rosie
  361. Rosie says:
    @The Real World

    That is an astute observation and likely has some merit.

    This is another one of those damned if you do, damned if you don’t situations. If we take our man’s feelings into account, we’re weak-willed and and don’t want to take responsibility for our actions. If we don’t take our man’s feelings into account, we’re selfish and how dare we impose a child on them against their will blah blah blah.

    But notice that they never defend us either way. They just argue among themselves about exactly why it is that we are so detestable.

  362. @Rosie

    According to the mass media, many women now accept that rape of women by males is impossible because women are just as strong as men. I live in a world where women who represent the USA at soccer are physically inferior to 15 and 16 year old boy soccer players. We shouldn’t assume that every woman, who claims she was physically overpowered and raped, should be prosecuted for a false report to the police.

    A majority of white women voted for Trump against Hillary Clinton. A lot of Republicans have been brainwashed by neurotic men and women employed by the billionaire media. They’re not the only ones. Back in the 1950s and sixties, I used to watch the silly little women portrayed in Jewish Hollywood movies and think “I’ve never met girls or women like that”. Perhaps it could be defended as artistic licence but, according to David Irving, Goebbels wanted to base Nazi propaganda on the Hollywood entertainment model rather than the English big lie model favored by Hitler. I think Goebbels understood people better.

    I didn’t notice that feminists in the sixties and seventies were unattractive, stupid or incorrect in their arguments. The only thing they didn’t seem to understand was how easy it was for the first Australian women who continued in their jobs after marriage. They didn’t grasp that their assumption that there would always be friends and relatives available to mind children for nothing depended entirely on most women previously giving up their jobs when they married. We’re all creatures of our times and it was impossible to tell them that, when you change things, things are changed. [email protected]

  363. @John Johnson

    Single White women are one of the most reliable constituents for Democrats.

    This is now. That was then.

    Female nature again trying to emotionally placate everyone instead of trying to determine what is true or lawful.

    You should have read Rurik’s emotional screed a week or two ago. Any pro-lifer pulled off the street at random would have cut his “logic” to pieces. Life begins at conception, period. The mumbo jumbo about ensoulment sentience and viability is emotion at work play.

    Married women supported Trump…

    Married. Women were much more likely to be married a century ago, when they supported Charles Evans Hughes and Warren Harding.

  364. @The Real World

    You are one of the few level-headed and practical male thinkers on here.

    Thanks, but I’m rarely “here”. I tend to stick to Steve Sailer’s page. Buchanan and Derb are among my favorite writers, but their comment sections go to pot almost immediately. It’s painful to watch.

  365. @Rosie

    You see, everything is women’s fault all the time under all circumstances.

    Women’s suffrage was men’s fault. Women were too smart to be taken in by it.

    When men abandon women and children, it’s not their fault.

    Those who mock the sacraments, of which marriage is one, are fated, if the Church is right, to eternal damnation. How that can be interpreted as “it’s not their fault” is beyond me. But apparently not beyond you.

    …a subtle jab at single mothers.

    You must be young. Women of my mother’s day were anything but subtle about their disdain for single mothers. Except, of course, widows.

    If we always picked the right guy…

    Bush (I) and Dole were bad, but not so bad that they needed to be replaced by a rapist. Whom women loved.

    • Replies: @Rosie
    , @Sparkon
    , @Anonymous
  366. This entire commentary is about liberal, leftist women, who only make up less than fifty percent of the female population. No where does it address conservative women, who do not, as a rule, act like this. It’s unfair to paint all women with this broad brush.

    • Agree: The Real World
  367. These ‘right-wing feminist women’ are the most hilarious thing ever existed in any political discourse. These women have somehow ‘realized’ to some extent that these ‘leftism'(not ‘jewish’ here, because literally nothing is more jewish than feminism and we here are talking about the so-called ‘right wing feminist women’ here) cannot go forever and it is already on the verge of collapse, and more importantly, it will very likely blow up the whole feminist power structure which was given by the jews for them, forever. Most women don’t actually care about any leftist slogan at all except feminism. These women’s only real concern is to preserve feminism. So, these ‘right-wing feminist women’ come up with various random schizo hoax theory nobody has ever heard anywhere, to the sole purpose of making excuses for feminism/women’s rights/gender equality etc. In other words, these women are trying to ‘preserve’ feminist social order after the inevitable collapse of JWO in the future. So these people trying to (ideologically) separate feminism from the collapse of family, from the jews, and from the new world order to preserve ‘women’s rights’, so to speak.

    The good news is, it is impossible. Feminism and women’s rights are at the core of jewish social order. Feminism alone can destroy a formerly strong and stable nation, as you can see clearly in Japan and South Korea. And just as like degenerate consumerism is impossible without immense wealth, feminism is impossible without societal wealth. Civilization and women’s rights are incompatible with each other. Just 100 years of women’s rights and no amount of power, wealth, or anything can save your nation from inevitable doom, as you can see right now in jewmerica. In fact, feminism can destroy a nation much, much faster if it is not for the former great wealth and power(which was made by patriarchy, not feminism, by the way), as you can see in South Korea.

    Supporting feminism and opposing leftism/jewish propaganda/or whatsoever is oxymoron at best. Literally nothing is more harmful and destructive than women’s rights, including jewish banking scam/free trade/immigration/communism/whatsoever. LGBTQ is literally an inevitable consequence of feminism, so it’s pointless to talk about which is more harmful between LGBTQ and feminism. But of course women and right-wing male feminists here are incapable of understanding any of these. And it’s for good, because it will accelerate the fall of the western civilization. cheers!

    • Replies: @Rosie
    , @RJ Macready
    , @Sarah
  368. @Rosie

    Meanwhile, here on planet Earth, public defenders offices get like 500 applications for every job from struggling solos who get tired of scrounging for clients

    That is true for a lot of professions. Hundreds of applications for any opening.

    The colleges continue to churn them out. Everyone has to go to college you see. Tis the establishment belief.

    Meanwhile I still can’t find a decent contractor and in my area they currently make more than public attorneys.

    As I said, just stop disgracing yourself by shooting your mouth off about things you know nothing of.

    OK Rosie. I will not criticize public defense attorneys. They have the bestest reputation in every town and city. The unmatched reputation of public defense attorneys has now been protected forever thanks to you Rosie. You did it.

    Now, your claim that a woman’s word can be the “sole evidence” on which to base a rape conviction is just silly.

    Silly? After DNA testing became available there were literally thousands of cases where men were exonerated. In fact the new problem is that there is a backlog in testing so there are cases where men can’t afford bail and have to sit in some apocalyptical jail while the idiotic local government takes a year to do the test. All from an accusation.

    Seriously, let go of your prejudices and just think about it for half a second. What part of “beyond a reasonable doubt” do you not f’ing understand?

    That’s part of the jury instructions and in the cases of rape or a hate crime you get your name dragged through the mud before it even goes to trail. In both cases a single accusation is enough.

    I had no idea you had so much confidence in the US justice system.

    Maybe you and OJ could do a show together on how effective it is.

    Anyways here is an interesting study about women by women:
    https://greatergood.berkeley.edu/article/item/when_women_are_more_likely_to_lie

    Basically women are more likely to lie when under social pressure. This is why they are indeed more vulnerable to liberalism than men. It backs what I said which is that women are more willing to accept fiction if they believe it will lead to a better social outcome.

    Both male and female nature are needed for a balanced society but we have currently gone too far in the latter direction whereby egalitarian fiction is the norm. That is why this discussion is occurring here. The colleges have been feminized and liberalized to where discussing reality is a taboo.

    • Replies: @Rosie
  369. Rosie says:
    @Reg Cæsar

    Women’s suffrage was men’s fault. Women were too smart to be taken in by it.

    Women are so smart that we know women are too dumb and/or wicked to be allowed to vote. Dear God, Reg. This takes the cake. Please spare us the sage spouting cryptic, paradoxical wisdom routine. It’s really tiresome.

    Those who mock the sacraments, of which marriage is one, are fated, if the Church is right, to eternal damnation. How that can be interpreted as “it’s not their fault” is beyond me. But apparently not beyond you.

    Why did you bring it up, then? And for that matter, just how do you know that criminals would have been better off with their shitty fathers in their lives?

    So you acknowledge that men commit almost all the crimes and that this is no fault of women, yet you still blab on about men are superior and should run everything, amirite? Doesn’t all that cognitive dissonance give you a headache?

    You must be young. Women of my mother’s day were anything but subtle about their disdain for single mothers. Except, of course, widows.

    I don’t believe you, nor do I particularly GAF. What the “women of your mother’s day” thought about single mothers is of no consequence whatsoever.

    Bush (I) and Dole were bad, but not so bad that they needed to be replaced by a rapist. Whom women loved.

    Seriously, WTF is your point?

    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar
  370. @Reg Cæsar

    Single White women are one of the most reliable constituents for Democrats.

    This is now. That was then.

    Voting patterns in the 60s are an entirely different subject. Marriage rates were much higher and there was the Dixiecrat split along with much different union and ethnic alliances. There wasn’t the single White woman phenomenon that exists today so of course single White women didn’t change the Nixon vote. Even in the early 80s there wasn’t this voting block of single White women that the Democrats were catering to. That partly developed after the Democrats opened up to Wall St funding under Clinton and moved away from unions. Once the funding shifted you had groups like single women and gays clamoring for power.

    Married women supported Trump…

    Married. Women were much more likely to be married a century ago, when they supported Charles Evans Hughes and Warren Harding.

    More single women and more immigrants favor the Democrats. The culture is liberal and liberalism encourages White women to be single. So pointing out that married women supported Trump or whatever candidate ignores which way the wind is blowing. If nothing changes then Democrats will get their DC supermajority thanks to women.

    But don’t worry I’m sure the conservatives will counter with lots of American flags on a stage and feel-good quotes from Reagan.

  371. @The Real World

    Well, there you go! You had dinner with a middle-aged woman and you asked her about how many femi-nazis she came across over the years, and she replied: “Hardly any.” And what a coincidence, it’s the same thing you experienced! Who would have ever guessed?

    Now that’s some hard irrefutable facts there. How could anyone even think of denying it? I must say that you’ve thoroughly discredited me now. And so I’ll just slink back to my expensive high rise office with all the millions I am paid for writing such dirty and subversive articles.

    • Replies: @The Real World
  372. @Reg Cæsar

    I will admit to you, up front, that I do enjoy busting people on this one.

    Life begins at conception, period.

    Crikey man, you don’t even realize that it is not known when conception occurs! It is a several step process and it takes days. So, Doctors estimate when a pregnancy first occurred.

    It is just one of many aspects of reproduction that millions, amazingly, don’t understand. But, that doesn’t stop them from having their erroneous, definitive opinions. Period. Lol…

    They also don’t grasp that approx. ONE THIRD of pregnancies don’t make it into the second trimester, they self-terminate. That is a large number. So, no, an early fetus is a potential life.

    The bottom line, that very few have the honesty to admit, is that the abortion hysteria from the Holy Rollers is just another attempted means to control women and try to turn the clock back.

    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar
  373. Rosie says:
    @spacewanderer

    And it’s for good, because it will accelerate the fall of the western civilization. cheers!

    Such is the rabid hatred of the incel scum that they openly long for the collapse of their own civilization. Ephialtes, may you live forever, in hell.

    You could chain women naked to the stove and it wouldn’t make a damned bit of difference. As long as men have access to birth control, they will use it.

    So these people trying to (ideologically) separate feminism from the collapse of family, from the jews, and from the new world order to preserve ‘women’s rights’, so to speak.

    We don’t have to separate that which is already separate. It is rather you who are attempting to tie women’s rights to White advocacy so you can hijack the pro-White movement for your own racially irrelevant agenda, sabotaging it in the process.

  374. @Controse

    “Assertion after assertion without reference to evidence” – You’re right, every sentence and paragraph should have been inundated with one scholarly reference after another. Yeah, that would have made the article so much more convincing for you and everyone else. How could I even think of making an assertion without appealing to some professor or academic?

    “We are witnessing the inevitable decline of a successful civilization” – Yeah, we’ve been “successful” alright – successful at morally debasing our culture, successful at permitting Jews to fully subvert our culture and deracinate every generation of White Americans for the past 70 years, successful at not protecting our borders, successful in suppressing typical Black dysfunction and criminality, and successful at avoid unnecessary foreign entanglements and endless proxy wars on behalf of Israel. Yeah, it’s all been glorious, and how dare anyone break the mood of the party to write about our generation of ‘pussy hats’!

    “The rise of feminism is not the problem” – Oh no, not a problem at all. Who would ever think such a preposterous thought? Granted, feminism is a symptom of some deeper and more problematic issues, but it still needs to be addressed. Anyone who is perceptive of current social and political trends knows that something is horrifically wrong and off-kilter with massive numbers of our American women. Yes, men share the blame as well, but it’s particularly evident in our women and they are not above legitimate criticism and reproof.

    • Troll: Corvinus
    • Replies: @Controse
  375. Rosie says:
    @John Johnson

    Single White women are one of the most reliable constituents for Democrats.

    Another big fat whopper of a damned lie. You’re on a roll, today John.

    The truth of the matter is that even if you only count college-educated single White women, they still vote for Democrats at far lower rates than blacks, browns, and yellows.

    • Replies: @John Johnson
  376. JimDandy says:
    @bwuce wee

    1. lesbians despise and revile ‘bi’ women. they cannot hate them enough

    Yeah, unless they’re cute and they think they have a shot with them, in which case they’re like flies on shit.

  377. @spacewanderer

    How exactly are Japan and South Korea being destroyed …genuine question. All I ever read lately is the success of South Korea in everything from science and tech to arts and cinema. S. Korea, much like the local mega conglomerate Samsung has only risen in the last 2 decades.

    Japan has a population issue but i think this was always the case. Japanese population decline was an issue decades ago.

  378. Rosie says:
    @spacewanderer

    There has never ever been something even remotely resembles this kind of slogan ever.

    I made it up, to mock the mockers, all in good fun you know.

    Much more women are pro-immigration than men,

    Can’t you people ever tell the truth. A broken clock is right twice. You lie every single time.

    both free trade and immigration restriction has never ever been bundled up with ‘masculinity’

    You’re not very perceptive, are you?

    Finally, your given statistics clearly has some serious problems, whatever it is, given that it claims only 5.64% of overall white population are concerned with white identity/solidarity.

    That isn’t what it said. That is the percentage that responded in the affirmative to all three questions. Back to the drawing board you go. Maybe if you keep nitpicking you can find some other reason to dismiss the evidence you don’t like.

  379. anarchyst says:
    @The Real World

    just like a woman…name-calling when you cannot refute the TRUTH…lol

    • Replies: @The Real World
  380. @Anon

    …mmm – reconquista started very early (“it lasted for a good portion of the Middle Ages from 718 to 1492″, https://www.ducksters.com/history/middle_ages/reconquista.php#:~:text=The%20Reconquista%20is%20the%20name,Ages%20from%20718%20to%201492, emphasis mine ). And I wonder what you mean by “Europeans started moving away from Christianity and towards science”, because the very foundation of modern science has been brought on by the Catholic philosopher and cardinal Nicolaus Cusanus, in his De leek over de geest (Uitgeverij Damon, Budel/NL 2001; Latin original Idiota de mente); as Leibniz put it two centuries later, “…nam si voluisset differre theorematum aut problematum inventiones, dum omnia axiomata et postulata demonstrata fuissent, fortasse nullam hodie Geometriam haberemus”, in: “Animadversiones in partem generalem Principorum Cartesianorum”, quoted by Hans Blumenberg (without translation of course) in Wirklichkeiten in denen wir leben, Verlag Philipp Reclam Jr, Stuttgart, Buch nr. 7715, pp. 42-43.

  381. Deadbeat says:
    @Pablo

    Men didn’t abdicate. State power was used to suppress men.

    • Replies: @RickMcHale
  382. Sarah says:
    @Anonymous

    The women involved usually think of the entity aborted as a baby, and often have severe depression and regret afterwards. Women have abortions because they believe they could not successfully raise the baby, and they regret it.

    Exact👌👍This is what I often see😰

  383. “Our justice system is already based on the idea that it is better that 10 guilty men go free than that 1 be punished unjustly. What does that number look like for you, John? 100, 1,000, 1,000,000? Just what power of 10 are we talking about here?”

    I am not sure that is accurate. It may be stated oft enough — but accuracy is another matter.

  384. I think the communication with women has me so disappointed, angry and frustrated, that I should refrain from commenting this article. I thought but could manage it, suffice it to say that any arguments that world is better off merely because there are more women involved in x number of activities in x numbers in x positions is contradicted by the data. Womanhood alone is no guarantee of a more honest, trustworthy more efficient or peaceful society.

  385. Sarah says:
    @spacewanderer

    The good news is, it is impossible. Feminism and women’s rights are at the core of […] social order. Feminism alone can destroy a formerly strong and stable nation, as you can see clearly in Japan and South Korea. And just as like degenerate consumerism is impossible without immense wealth, feminism is impossible without societal wealth. Civilization and women’s rights are incompatible with each other. Just 100 years of women’s rights and no amount of power, wealth, or anything can save your nation from inevitable doom, as you can see right now in […]merica. In fact, feminism can destroy a nation much, much faster if it is not for the former great wealth and power (which was made by patriarchy, not feminism, by the way), as you can see in South Korea.

    Feminism is involved but it is not the main cause.
    In my opinion, the major cause of the falling birth rate is the concept of the so-called female “career”. Too many women, unfortunately the most intelligent ones, which has a dysgenic effect, consume the most fertile years of their lives doing long studies and then starting to “succeed” in a “career” (most often as employees in a company). The more the years go by, the less children they will have, often only one or none at all😰

    • Troll: The Real World
  386. Corvinus says:
    @Dave Wightman

    “Not only did the CIA orchestrate the killings of JFK, RFK, and they attempt on Reagan’s life”

    You mean there is evidence of complicity.

    “they insituted feminism for social engineering and population control(and to destroy the nuclear family).”

    That’s a theory.

    “The CIA also invented Modern Art for their own nefarious purposes.”

    You mean promoter modern art to serve as a counter to Soviet propaganda.

    “And these are all in fact matters of historical record.”

    You mean a version of what you think is true.

    “And to quote you: ‘Lol, you’re all talk.’”

    I’m not the one who says our government should be overthrown. The Orcs have invaded the Shire, allegedly, and you want to talk logistics rather than fight.

    • Replies: @Dave Wightman
  387. @bwuce wee

    Not so fast , my friend. You are correct in your assessment of the “welfare ” programs that are traditionally identified by the public as such: SNAP, TANF( formerly AFDC),Medicaid etc. Those programs have as the largest single group ( not the majority, but what is referred to in mathematics/ statistics as a plurality) whites, and as whites are the ( slim,, and rapidly declining,, 57 percent and dropping like a rock in a pond)majority of the United States population, they have by far the lowest RATE of welfare use , when you relegate the term “welfare” to the aforementioned programs. However, there are some welfare programs where white sloths and social leeches remain the majority of recipients, such as the gigantic fraud perpetrated against the taxpayers known as Supplemental Security Income, or SSI(which, contrary to popular belief, is not financed out of formal Social Security Administration ,SSA, funds but rather is simply administrated and disbursed through the SSA). In a broader context, when you aggregate whites who are leeching off the backs and labor of productive people in taxpayer funded government employment ( which offer copious benefits and pensions , in addition to inordinately lucrative base pay to people who often have no discernable skill sets) and not enrolled in formal “welfare” programs, you can appreciate that the majority of leeches who are subsisting off of federal or state administered taxpayer funded largesse are indeed white, like those bums in the NYPD and FDNY who were busted for committing a massive, decade long SSDI fraud against federal taxpayers back in 2014.
    Now , don’t get me wrong: we’re on the same side, and I want to reiterate that while white social parasites are a slight majority of those who are taking advantage of the productive, taxpaying public through both formal entitlements as well as “indirect” welfare programs( such as SSDI and taxpayer funded, defined benefit public pensions) , whites do need have the lowest rate of welfare use, when compared to their share of the overall population. And the racial minorities that are demographically eclipsing white Americans are indeed being subsidized by those very same whites( e.g. , as per the United States Census Bureau’s Survey of Income and Program Participation or SIPP, some 75 percent of Hispanic households with children in the United States use some form of welfare, whether immigrant or not) , providing a literal example of paying for the bullets that the government is shooting you with.
    That said, never forget the role that white trash degenerates play in maintaining the current fraud against working people by the government represented by the taxpayer funded welfare/ public pension swindle. There is no other solution to the Great Replacement and eventual extinction of white Europeans than the establishment of a permanent, physical ethnostate ( or ethnostates) that ruthlessly exclude non-whites. However, like the treasonous white prostitute politicians who enable the Jewish minority ,controlled mass media, white degenerates,, criminals, bums and leeches also serve no eugenics purpose in advancing the genetic evolution and civilizational progress of European descended people.

    https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.census.gov/content/dam/Census/library/publications/2021/demo/p70br-171.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwi8s5Tn1Zj4AhU5mIQIHYjeBKcQFnoECAQQBg&usg=AOvVaw3sJpPrm62vzd9guc1YpB9E

    Watch “9/11 disability scam: Ex-cops, firefighters accused of false claims” on YouTube

    • Replies: @bwuce wee
  388. @anarchyst

    Just like a typical male….running away and hiding from responsibility and the TRUTH.

    Answer the question posed in the previous post. Do you have the cojones?

  389. @RockaBoatus

    Gee, the guy that writes articles has reading comprehension problems. Who would have guessed that?

    I stated, “as an aside”. I also depicted her instant and notable reaction and her spot-on response – which you aren’t able to counter. She, and millions of other females, have spent their lives around women and they know the numbers are few of the wingnuts you thought so important to write about because you know a few female weirdos and read too much manipulated media dreck.

    Now, when will you be posting your article about the unceasing and detrimental violent behaviors of too many men and the horrendous effects that has on our nation?

  390. Kali says:
    @Nancy

    Thank you Nancy!

    I’m a married woman, 54 years old and, to my great surprise having grown up in a leftist/progressive atmosphere during the 70’s/80’s, very, very happy to take on the “traditional” (read natural) female role in my household.

    I tend to come at the topic of gender differences/complimetaries from the perspective of energy: Male/masculine energy is active and primary, whilst female energy is receptive and secondary, or better described, given the negative conotations, as “responsive”.

    Put very simply, he provides the materials and resources from which we create a harmonious, well-balanced home. He then protects and defends the home, as she nurtures the young and cares for the old.

    When we recognise our unique strengths as women, as complimented by the unique stregths of our male counteparts, harmony, happiness and fulfillment are the result. Fighting against nature to become masculine – at the expence of both men and women, destroys the balance. The results of which we see all around us today.

    Like you, I hope that “the lunacy is becoming obvious to most rational women, and they can follow their nature into the areas of real gratification and benefit…”

    Much love,
    Kali.

    • Thanks: Sarah
    • LOL: Realist
    • Replies: @Nancy
    , @The Real World
  391. Tucker says:

    Here is a simple piece of advice to all men.

    Never, and I do mean, NEVER vote for any female who is running for political office. And, this is an especially critical rule to adhere to when a female is running for the US Senate, the US House of Representatives, or for the Presidency.

    And, I’ve been seeing a few rumors (which I suspect are being spread by jews who understand the weakness, pliability, gullibility and easy to manipulate tendencies of White females in particular) that are floating the idea that the Orange Cuck should pick a female like Nicky Nimrata Haley or Kristi Noem or Tulsi Gabbard or one of the other dozens of RINO w0men to be his VP on his 2024 ticket. Female politicians are biologically and emotionally hardwired to be RINO traitors and our Founders were 100 percent correct when they prohibited them from holding elected office.

    If he does that, I will not only refuse to vote for the female VP, but I will also refuse to vote for the Orange Moron.

    I have had my gut full of watching this Orange Idiot exercising what has to be the absolutely worst, most infuriating and pathetically self destructive decisions on the type of people he surrounds himself with, and who then promptly start working to stymie and thwart every single campaign promise he made to his support base in order to get elected.

    Oh, and I have one additional comment. It has to do with how the diabolically evil Democrats have continually used the Ju-Jitsu tactic against Republicans and how the unbelievably STUPID Republicans can never seem to wise up to what their enemy is doing to them. We have the midterm elections coming up in a few short months, right? Every poll taken is predicting that the Democtats are going to get hammered and blown out of power. Every issue that matters to America voters – the Democrats have nothing to offer except more of the same thing that has angered the American voting public. Higher gas prices. Zero border security. Threats of more neocon wars that never end. Pushing sexual degeneracy – now even in elementary schools. The deliberate, premeditated, malicious and clearly treasonous Great Replacement Agenda – which amounts to an openly declared war on White Americans with extremely strong implications of a racial genocide agenda driving this war. So, what can the Democrats do to inspire and motivate people to vote for them in November? Very little. Which means they are panicked.

    Enter their trusty Ju-Jitsu tactic. If they can’t find a way to motivate or energize their voting base, then they resort to Plan B. With all of these mighty convenient and suspicious ‘mass shootings’ that are suddenly exploding across our country – the diabolically evil Democrats pounce on them and start shrieking about passing the most totalitarian, anti-Second Amendment legislation in the history of this country. And, here is where the Ju-Jitsu maneuver comes into play. If they can’t motivate or energize their voting base – the next best thing is to snooker the Stupid Republicans into betraying and pissing off THEIR VOTING BASE by suckering them into voting along with the democrats for gun bans, and gun control that will anger their voters and probably serve to demotivate and de-energize red state voters who will see this as a betrayal.

    The left has been using this tactic to suppress the turnout for the GOP for decades, and the GOP is just too embarrassingly stupid to avoid being suckered in this way.

    • Thanks: anarchyst
    • Replies: @Anymike
    , @Achmed E. Newman
  392. Truth says:
    @bwuce wee

    3. welfare stats (59 million welfare recipients that are part of at least one of the programs like SNAP.)- “The majority of SNAP recipients, 38.6% to be precise, are Caucasian. African Americans are the second biggest group, accounting for 24.8% of the recipients, followed by Hispanics who make up 11.5%.

    so quick fuzzy math tells us that:
    a. 59 million welfare recipients
    b. approx 22 mill are ‘white’
    c. approx 29 mill are ‘black’

    Great job.

    Was your Doctorate in Pure Math or Applied?

    • Replies: @bwuce wee
  393. Kali says:
    @showmethereal

    It would be interesting to know how patterns of abuse have altered since the undermining of traditional gender roles took off.

    Sexual abuse of women seems to me to be part and parcel of the “free love” and alegedly “consequence free” sex societal memes took hold and pornography became ubiquitous.

    In part here I speak from personal experience: the man (actually teenage boy) who abused me all those years age used ponographic magazines for “instruction”. If it wasn’t for easy access to such material quite possibly my own childhood would have been much easier. (I blame the (((social engineers)) myself.

    These days it seems that young boys are just as vulnerable to such abuse. – Maybe this is what “they” mean by “equality”.

    Sorry for the unpleasant subject matter. Be assured I found (or was gifted) the stregth to heal those wounds. Today all is well.

    With love,
    Kali.

    • Agree: showmethereal
  394. “They demand to be heard”

    Sorry, the latter “a” has slipped to an incorrect place.
    This should read “They demand to be a herd”.

  395. Sparkon says:
    @Reg Cæsar

    Bush (I) and Dole were bad, but not so bad that they needed to be replaced by a rapist. Whom women loved.

    But George H.W “Poppy” Bush was himself preceded by a rapist (and liar) in the Oval Office, Ronald Reagan, whom women loved, so what’s new?

    In a 1991 interview with People Magazine [sic], actress Selene Walters claimed that in the 1950s Reagan forced himself on her, saying: “I was fighting him. I didn’t want him to make love to me. He’s a very big man, and he just had his way.”

    The claim was initially published in Kitty Kelly’s 1992 book “Nancy Reagan: The Unauthorized Biography.” Due to widespread skepticism about many of the claims in the book, People interviewed Walters directly. She generally confirmed the accuracy of Kelly’s account, only disputing that Reagan broke down the door to get into her apartment. She said she let him in willingly before he raped her.

    https://www.creepsheet.com/accused/ronald-reagan/

    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar
  396. Richard B says:
    @Richard B

    • Troll: Realist

    Haha! Speaking of girlie men and overreacting. Thanks for proving my point Realist. You can’t argue or engage in civil debate. So you just click the Troll button.

    Seriously though, your trolling is getting out of hand. Ron Unz was right about you. Hopefully something will be done about it. You’re a blight on an otherwise excellent comment section of a great website. Quit your childhood and grow up.

  397. Bel Riose says:
    @The Real World

    If it’s 100% your body…

    …and 100% your choice…

    …it should also be 100% your responsibility 🙂

    • Replies: @Rosie
    , @The Real World
  398. Bel Riose says:
    @The Real World

    Good thing she tossed her head back and waved her hand!

    Otherwise, we might be tempted to call BS on this story.

  399. CSFurious says:
    @Ray Caruso

    The actual freedom permits the “Woke” ideology to spread. I think that an authoritarian like Putin is required to fix America. It is unfortunate.

  400. Nancy says:
    @Kali

    Thanks, Kali : ) I have to admit that long ago it occurred to me that women might actually be superior to men, because we make people… in a healthy society, what is more valuable than people? Men contribute, of course, but mainly make ‘things’. I say this half-facetiously, and also salute any women who find satisfaction in pursuing more ‘masculine’ avenues…. as long as they salute us ‘homebodies’ 🙂

    • Agree: Kali
    • Replies: @Rosie
    , @Jeff M. Smith
  401. @Deadbeat

    Absolutely ! The old guys referred to it as a “stacked deck”. Every particle of American government is arrayed against the white man, all of it. We have all seen this.

    • LOL: The Real World
  402. Anon[236] • Disclaimer says:

    Actual discrimination against white males is what pushes women, minorities, and trannies up the ladder. It was done by certain white males who wanted a power base of weaklings to protect their own job from predation from other white males.

  403. Anonymous[118] • Disclaimer says:
    @Reg Cæsar

    Here’s the reference for your “Women’s suffrage was men’s fault. Women were too smart to be taken in by it.” line:
    https://thetransformedwife.com/why-most-women-opposed-womens-suffrage/
    Most people don’t know this and find it hard to believe.

    As for Rosie: think of her as an Eliza program.
    http://psych.fullerton.edu/mbirnbaum/psych101/Eliza.htm
    or a non-player character.

    • Thanks: Sarah
  404. bwuce wee says:
    @John Johnson

    i recall there was a work xmas secret santa party i attended. you bring a gift and draw names out of a hat to receive gifts. well, i was near the end, and when my name was drawn i received a gift which turned out to be from the lesbian. the gift was a lavender t-shirt with a sexy female nude illustrated on it that read: ‘the goddess is with you!’ jackpot! the lesbian was very very upset that her gift went to me because i was a HET (heterosexual male). i would not give it back, and boy, was she pissed! she was a HATER! and merry xmas to you, too! here is an example of another HATER, but this time the NWO trans are destroying the ancient order of dinosaur lesbians:

    https://www.infowars.com/posts/norwegian-feminist-faces-three-years-in-prison-for-saying-biological-men-cant-be-lesbians/

    the whole LBGQT thing is theatre of the absurd…

    • Thanks: Sarah
  405. Rosie says:
    @John Johnson

    They have the bestest reputation in every town and city.

    Yes, indeed they do among the people who know what the hell they’re talking about. And every time private attorneys write out that \$2000 monthly check for health insurance, they think how nice it would be to have one of those secure cushy gubmint jobs with the pension and the Cadillac health care plan.

    Silly? After DNA testing became available there were literally thousands of cases where men were exonerated. In fact the new problem is that there is a backlog in testing so there are cases where men can’t afford bail and have to sit in some apocalyptical jail while the idiotic local government takes a year to do the test. All from an accusation.

    Those are not the cases we’re talking about here, and they are not proof of women lying. Those are almost invariably cases of mistaken identity in a stranger rape, not disputes as to whether an encounter with an acquaintance was consensual or not, which is the root of all the hysteria and demonization of women as vindictive liars. Nice try, though.

    That’s part of the jury instructions and in the cases of rape or a hate crime you get your name dragged through the mud before it even goes to trail. In both cases a single accusation is enough.

    Again, something that your average man has nothing whatsoever to worry about, and indeed has more to do with partisan politics than anything about women, as you well know. The media only attacks conservative men.

    Basically women are more likely to lie when under social pressure. This is why they are indeed more vulnerable to liberalism than men. It backs what I said which is that women are more willing to accept fiction if they believe it will lead to a better social outcome.

    Really, you’re nibbling around the edges here, John, and it’s just silly. How many tenured White male professors are there? And how many Kevin McDonalds? Seriously, I can kind of understand men for feeling humiliated by White male cowardice and seeking to purge their shame by blaming women. It’s actually really sad. I’ve heard that men’s testosterone goes down when theor football team loses. I would imagine something similar happens to men when confronted with the truth about White male treachery stemming from greed and cowardice. Unfortunately, Whites have no choice but to face the facts in order to move forward, men and women together.

    This is why they are indeed more vulnerable to liberalism than men.

    Women are not more vulnerable to liberalism than men. Women are susceptible to the egalitarian variety of liberalism. Men are more vulnerable to the libertarian variety. Libertarianism and egalitarian universalism are two sides of the same liberal coin, and both are equally corrosive of the nation.

    Both male and female nature are needed for a balanced society

    Finally, something fair and reasonable.

    but we have currently gone too far in the latter direction whereby egalitarian fiction is the norm… The colleges have been feminized and liberalized to where discussing reality is a taboo.

    Here you make the assumption that women in academia are to blame for the erosion of free speech. The study you cited, assuming it says what you say it does, is at most suggestive evidence for this assumption. What you fail to consider is that the study considers the population as a whole, and academic women are not drawn from a random sample of the general female population. Like the notably truthful women who wrote the study you cited, they are in fact drawn from the right tail of the bell curve, and high IQ is associated with free speech absolutism.

    Moreover, even if it could be shown that academic women are somewhat less supportive of free speech than academic men, men are still the majority of college deans and faculty. How is a minority of high IQ women, who are not very enthusiastic about censorship themselves, able to drown out the men? Even in male-dominated disciplines like business? Or philosophy? Male cowardice in academic philosophy is the most disgraceful of all, given that free speech has always been cherished by philosophers going back to ancient times. Surely you recognize that (((something else))) is going on.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parrhesia

    That is why this discussion is occurring here.

    No, John, that’s not why this discussion is going on here. Now that your evil twin has gone away and fair and reasonable John is back, I would urge you, in the interest of sincere dialogue and truth-seeking, to read between the lines. This article is all about how men shouldn’t share power with women because female influence is pernicious and destructive. It is not some sort of innocuous call for balance. It is divisive poison.

    • Thanks: Kali
    • Replies: @restless94110
  406. Rosie says:
    @Bel Riose

    If it’s 100% your body…

    …and 100% your choice…

    …it should also be 100% your responsibility

    If some way could be found to give men some sort of legal say in abortion decisions, would you finally STFU about the egregious injustice of men actually being required to support theor offspring?

    If so, where do I sign?

  407. @Rosie

    Here I go again..

    Asking you to comment on this, Rosie. Remember Phyllis Schlafly? She wrote the following article in 2015. It’s about the changing ratio of men to women in colleges and how that affects social relationships. At the time of writing men made up only around 40% of students.

    https://www.phyllisschlafly.com/family/new-math-on-college-campuses-210/

    Here’s the part I would bring to your attention:
    “One female student described the new relationship between the sexes like this. ‘Out of that 40 percent male population, there are maybe 20 percent we would consider dating, and out of those 20 percent, ten have girlfriends, so all the girls are fighting over that other 10 percent.’”

    There’s that 80/20 rule again. We all laughed at the meme that 80% of men are below average from the OK Cupid survey.

    Just one “female student’s” opinion? Well, here’s the article where Phyllis picked up the quote:

    https://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/07/fashion/07campus.html

    Not a lot of people in the comments section denying that 80% of men are shut out of dating, so that’s a verification that the female student’s opinion is not wildly out of line with reality, and a further verification of the 80/20 rule. I suspect those 80% of men are also shut out of relationships of any kind with women, so out of Rosie’s list of ugly/poor/clumsy/untalented, it’s hard to see how women would even KNOW whether or not the men are clumsy and untalented. They also would not really know about “poor” – some millionaires drive used cars, some rich guys dress down.

    I also did not see any sympathy in the comments for the 80%, not even from Phyllis, which surprised me when I first read her article.

    But to your main point above, Rosie: what did the female student mean by “we” when she said “there are maybe 20 percent we would consider dating”? Did she mean the top-tier women on campus who are “out of the league” of most men (including herself in that group)? No, she makes it clear in another part of the quote that “we” means “all the girls.”

    That’s one clear-cut difference between men and women. Most men find most women to be attractive. Mot women find most men to be UNattractive.

    • Replies: @Rosie
  408. @Bel Riose

    It takes two to tango. Perhaps no one ever taught you that.

    In fact, two people can enjoy all sorts of physical activity and there is only one thing that needs to not happen for a pregnancy to be avoided. If he kept his bodily fluid away from her vag then all would be fine. So, some would argue that he is more responsible for unintended pregnancy than she is.

    He only had to not do that one thing. But, often, he is too irresponsible to even manage that.

    P.S. Re Comment 403 – Sad that the reality of what my friend (and I) stated about the limited number of rabid femi-nazi’s in America actually triggers you. You should be glad about that. Cognitive dissonance much?

    • Replies: @Bel Riose
  409. Malla says:
    @American Bulwark

    Jewesses infect White women with the feminist virus

    And the virus makes White gentile women start behaving like nasty Jewesses. Jewesses are making gentile White women like themselves. Nasty.

  410. anon[345] • Disclaimer says:

    @Rockaboatus #306

    “One doesn’t need a graduate degree nor even a high degree of intelligence to discern that all of this social engineering will lead to less White children being born.”

    As will “Rosie’s” posts, which are hardly designed to promote reconciliation between the sexes – or “among the genders,” as we moderns would say.

  411. Rosie says:
    @Nancy

    Thanks, Kali : ) I have to admit that long ago it occurred to me that women might actually be superior to men, because we make people…

    If one wanted to make the argument that women are superior, there is all manner of support for that proposition, to wit:

    Men are more likely to be clinical psychopaths than women.
    Men are more likely to murder, maim, and rob people.
    Men go around killing each other by the millions.
    Men are by far more likely to be sick sexual perverts who murder children once they’re “finished” with them.
    They are reckless behind the wheel, causing thousands if not tens of thousands of casualties every hear.
    They have a reprehensible and curious habit of reducing other human beings to chattel so they don’t have to pick their own cotton or whatever, going back to the dawn of civilization.
    They put their inventive genius to use designing and building weapons that could annihilate Life on earth many times over.
    They are so obsessed with sex that it clouds their judgment so thoroughly that they come to believe that they are entitled to control us to ensure a steady supply, rather than recognizing and correcting their own carnal weakness like the best of men.
    They sell out their own people for personal enrichment.

    I coupd go on but you get the idea. Meanwhile, men are reduced to citing invasive, and probably unethical, studies of women’s desires to detect our dark side, given the dearth of actual, consummated misbehavior to use against us.

    All that said, I choose to focus on the positive: their bravery and heroism, their diligent pursuit of medical knowledge that has so drastically improved human quality of life, even their hard, silent, dirty, and dangerous work in mining, construction, etc.

    Fundamentally, we can all choose whether to see the glass as half empty or half full. When it comes to women, misogynists insist on seeing the glass as 90% empty.

  412. @Kali

    Kali – I am glad that you have found the right place in the world for your interests and talents. That is truly a blessing as many people struggle to find that. I feel sure that most women would say the same thing I am.

    Yet, across many of your posts here, you seem a bit defensive about it. That suggests that you are not entirely secure about your choices and, it seems, your preferred way of trying to deal with that is to suggest that women who don’t tend towards your life path – ‘aren’t doing it right and are defying their nature’. That is a vastly provincial way of seeing the world and is like a viewpoint from a prior century.

    I shake my head, this is the 21st century and, finally, women have the freedom to make broad choices and it’s bad enough that many men still would prefer to limit them but, to also have women wish they would cater primarily to roles those provincial women think are appropriate? It’s truly astonishing and suggests some degree of self-loathing on your part. Perhaps spend more time thinking about that.

    Humans are not cookie-cutters – many of them have vast range and no one should even think or want to limit them from pursuing their best talents. It is not remotely “lunacy” that women, when finally having the opportunity after centuries of oppression, have flung the doors open and run widely to see and find the range they have. It makes total sense. The pendulum, as always, swings and recalibrates continually and that’s how things always flow – it’s the human condition.

    • Replies: @Kali
  413. Rosie says:

    Oh dear. I haven’t read that article by the esteemed Ms. Schlaffly, but I’ll go ahead and give you the reasons I think you’re wrong.

    First of all, your “one female student” is not an authority concerning this. (Neither is Phyllis Schlaffly). You can find one person to say almost anything, so let’s look at the data. This assumption among your sort that citing a woman is some sort of slam dunk is silly.

    We all laughed at the meme that 80% of men are below average from the OK Cupid survey.

    As I have patiently explained any number of times now, it doesn’t matter that women rate 80% of men as below average. What matters is what women actually do. In case you missed the charts I posted above, I’ll post the link to the source article here:

    https://techcrunch.com/2009/11/18/okcupid-inbox-attractive/

    Men are more generous in their appraisals of women’s appearance, but in practice their actual contacts skew heavily to the most attractive. Women are less generous in their appraisals of men’s appearance, but then, as the article says, turn right around and send messages to men they just said were unattractive. Nice words about women’s appearance does not form healthy families nor produce White children. Commitment, which always starts with a contact, is required.

    Moreover, your claim fails to take account of the idiosyncratic nature of female desire. Women only think 20% of men are attractive, but here’s the thing. They disagree on who that 20% actually are. Therefore, your claim that women are all pursuing the same 20% of men is the opposite of the truth, as the charts in the techcrunch article clearly show. It is actually men who are hypercompetitive for the most attractive mates. You can read all about it here…

    https://www.livescience.com/5502-men-agree-hot-women.html

    I suspect those 80% of men are also shut out of relationships of any kind with women,

    This is patently, demonstrably false. By age 24, half if women are either married or cohabiting, one has to assume that many more are saying someone exclusively hoping it will move on to the next level, because by age 29, the number of married or cohabiting women approaches 80%. So, yes, your 80/20 rule holds, it just goes in the opposite direction from what you claimed.

    https://news.gallup.com/poll/109402/age-24-marriage-wins.aspx

    I’m sorry but the data just don’t support you.

  414. Controse says:
    @RockaBoatus

    Thank you for quoting from my comment. Sarcasm tips the reader that you disagree but leaves them wondering why exactly. Jews are uncommonly successful in our modern civilization. I guess that is because they have had all the advantages. Am I being sarcastic? If not why not?

  415. @Rosie

    Single White women are one of the most reliable constituents for Democrats.

    Another big fat whopper of a damned lie. You’re on a roll, today John.

    The truth of the matter is that even if you only count college-educated single White women, they still vote for Democrats at far lower rates than blacks, browns, and yellows.

    Nothing I said is a lie. An exit poll shows who voted for the candidate relative to other groups in that election and not how they vote as a group.

    70% of single women vote Democrat
    https://winteryknight.com/2012/10/29/why-do-about-70-of-single-divorced-unmarried-women-vote-democrat/

    Here is a post by a liberal nutcase bragging about single women as a voting bloc:
    https://www.thecut.com/2016/02/political-power-single-women-c-v-r.html

    White women vote Democrat until they get married. This has been true for decades and since fewer women are getting married the pattern favors Democrats. Don’t bother stomping your feet at a well established truth.

    When White women are connected to having children all these liberal theories are just that. Theories.

    However when they might be creating their own White sons they re-think the liberal theory that race doesn’t exist and everything is the fault of White men. They aren’t having children and can live in a fantasy world where White men are the devil and evolution left a magical race exception.

    It’s not “by chance” that the majority of feminist leaders are homely White women. They have extremely limited access to White men and turn their bitterness towards serving establishment fiction.

    • Replies: @Rosie
  416. @Rosie

    Women are so smart that we know women are too dumb and/or wicked to be allowed to vote.

    That was never the claim put forth by the major antisuffragists. They were worried that enterprising politicians would invade and pollute the home sphere by targeting women voters.

    Of course, we know nothing like this ever happened!

    What the “women of your mother’s day” thought about single mothers is of no consequence whatsoever.

    Are you saying some women are more equal than others?

    And for that matter, just how do you know that criminals would have been better off with their 💩 fathers in their lives?

    Irrelevant. We would have been better off with their fathers in their lives.

    • Replies: @Rosie
  417. @The Real World

    Crikey man, you don’t even realize that it is not known when conception occurs!

    That doesn’t change the validity of the statement.

    So, Doctors estimate when a pregnancy first occurred.

    Just like lawyers and public officials estimate when a sex act occurs. That’s when one’s obligation to the (potential) child, and to his other parent, begins. Yes, unavoidable rape complicates this, and brings the rights of the individuals to the fore.

    The bottom line, that very few have the honesty to admit, is that the abortion hysteria from the Holy Rollers is just another attempted means to control women and try to turn the clock back.

    To control fertile adults. Civilization hangs on this. We used to know this in our bones.

    “Holy Rollers” were late to the fold. It took decades to entice them to the stance Rome had held to all along. Fifty years ago, the positions of mainline Protestants and low-church “evangelicals” were much closer to each other. But while one swam the Tiber, the other swam the Thames, to Lambeth.

    I highly recommend Daniel K Williams’s history of the period. I read the entire thing and still have no clue to Williams’s personal views. (It centers on the US experience, so if anyone knows of similar balanced treatments for Canada, the UK, etc, please let us know.)

    • Replies: @The Real World
  418. Bel Riose says:
    @The Real World

    “In fact, two people can enjoy all sorts of physical activity and there is only one thing that needs to not happen for a pregnancy to be avoided. If she kept his bodily fluid away from her vag then all would be fine. So, some would argue that she is more responsible for unintended pregnancy than he is.”

    “She only had to not do that one thing. But, often, she is too irresponsible to even manage that.”

    There — fixed it for you!

    After all, we don’t want to assert that only men are responsible for unwanted pregnancies, do we?

    In fact — since only the woman runs the risk of becoming pregnant — it’s incumbent on her to exercise MORE caution than the man to avoid an unwanted pregnancy.

    And guess what! There are plenty of ways she can do so.

    Birth control methods available to a woman:

    1. Tubal Ligation
    2. IUD
    3. Hormonal Implant
    4. Hormonal Shot
    5. Hormonal Patch
    6. Vaginal Ring
    7. The Pill
    8. Female Condom
    9. Emergency Contraception
    10. Spermicide

    Birth control methods available to a man:

    1. Condom
    2. Vasectomy

    Geez — compared to men, women have many more birth control options available to them!

    I wonder why women don’t make more use of them to avoid unwanted pregnancies…?

    And I also wonder why women like you only blame men for unwanted pregnancies? After all, doesn’t the woman bear some responsibility?

    Is it because feminism is, ultimately, about women avoiding responsibility?

    Is it just another example of female solipsism?

    Or are you merely stupid and misandrist?

    • Replies: @The Real World
  419. anon[107] • Disclaimer says:

    @The Real World #414

    “P.S. Re Comment 403 – Sad that the reality of what my friend (and I) stated about the limited number of rabid femi-nazi’s in America actually triggers you. You should be glad about that. Cognitive dissonance much? ”

    Yes, yes, and you learned of that formulaic little dig in “How to be a Harpy for Dummies, 101.”

  420. anon[107] • Disclaimer says:

    @Rosie #417

    “Men are by far more likely to be sick sexual perverts who murder children once they’re “finished” with them.”

    Whereas Rosie’s superior female is more likely to murder them before they’ve even begun. After a night of irresponsible, injudicious fun, just kill off the consequences and move on with your lives. How many abortions now? Tens of millions of deranged females exercising their “rights” to their bodies.

    • Thanks: Mike Tre
    • Replies: @Rosie
  421. @Reg Cæsar

    That doesn’t change the validity of the statement.

    It does as far as the many halfwits who declare with defiance that nothing should be done regarding a pregnancy after conception. While the ignoramuses don’t even know that their demarcation point is unknown. ROFL, when you point that out to the sillies, they sputter, get agitated and then claim fertilization is the start of life! Then you ask them when that is (more LOL from me) and they invariably spout some insult and run away, embarrassed.

    To control fertile adults.

    Civilization hangs on this.

    What do you mean by each of those?

    Btw, there is a fairly easy way to control male fertility and it would usefully solve a huge number of these problems. But, it will never be entertained because it requires something relevant and responsible from males in these matters and they would resist such intensely as they prove on an ongoing basis.

    If 18 year old boys had vasectomies, after depositing plenty of sperm in sperm banks, then unintended pregnancies wouldn’t occur, abortions would cease, unwanted children wouldn’t be born, foster care systems would probably shrink by half, far less child abuse would occur, etc.

    Then, later, when he and a female partner decide to have a child they can simply source his sperm from safe storage, like so many couples do, and it is inseminated. But, that is far too rational, it solves too many problems and males would have toddler meltdowns about it therefore, it won’t occur in my lifetime.

    “Holy Rollers” were late to the fold.

    It doesn’t matter that they were late. They learned that it’s a public brow-beating way to try to keep women subjugated and they also LOVE the money-raising aspects of raging about abortion. Therefore, they will continue the verbal beatings and money grubbing.

    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar
  422. @Bel Riose

    LOL! That is one pathetic meltdown. What are you, 16 years old?

    You’re making statements of the obvious and listing the various birth control methods? Not to mention missing the entirely accurate point I made? Yes, I think you’re kid and have much to learn about life.

    Let me help – in the real world, people sometimes want to physically engage when there is nothing available for her to use. Guess what? In the real world, often, they are going to go ahead – human nature, that’s how it is. There is only one thing that needs to not happen in all that fun to avoid a pregnancy. If he is a mature and responsible person, he will not do that one thing.

    Then, unintended pregnancy avoided, abortion avoided, stress avoided, financial obligations for the next 18 years avoided – it is total win. If he can be responsible enough to keep his bodily fluids away from her particular body part.

    Now, why don’t you be a grown-up and tell us why that proves to be such an epic challenge to the “logical and rational” gender?

    • Replies: @Bel Riose
  423. Rosie says:
    @John Johnson

    Nothing I said is a lie. An exit poll shows who voted for the candidate relative to other groups in that election and not how they vote as a group.

    And here is how single White women vote as a group:

    They vote for Republicans more than any other group except White men and married White women, both of whom vote Republican. Period. Therefore, the truth of the matter is that they are the least reliable group of voters in the Democratic constituency, precisely the opposite of what you said. Therefore, what you said is not an “established fact” but a blatant falsehood.

    70% of single women vote Democrat

    I guess your mendacious evil twin is back. In your earlier post, you didn’t say single women are one of the Democrats’ most reliable voting blocs. You said “single White women” are one of their most reliable voting blocs.

    White women vote Democrat until they get married. This has been true for decades and since fewer women are getting married the pattern favors Democrats. Don’t bother stomping your feet at a well established truth.

    When White women are connected to having children all these liberal theories are just that. Theories.

    However when they might be creating their own White sons they re-think the liberal theory that race doesn’t exist and everything is the fault of White men. They aren’t having children and can live in a fantasy world where White men are the devil and evolution left a magical race exception.

    Have you actually bothered to look at the trend to see if White women as a whole are less likely to vote Republican as fewer get married?

    The truth of the matter is that single White women don’t vote for Democrats because they believe all the bullshit about White men being evil. They don’t. They vote for Democrats because they support the welfare state. White women voters care about bread and butter issues like health care, jobs, etc. Hardly any White voters care about the race b.s.

    It’s not “by chance” that the majority of feminist leaders are homely White women. They have extremely limited access to White men and turn their bitterness towards serving establishment fiction.

    This is the other problem with “female hypergamy.” It ignores the fact that men are at least as particular as women about mate selection, only about particularly shallow and meaningless things.

    • Replies: @John Johnson
  424. @Corvinus

    Nope. I never said anything about ‘overthrowing the government’- Biden already did that. Orcs- now i get it, you are a LARP fantasy role playing nerd- good for you- fight the orcs in your magic the gathering circle, loser. Your lame punkass attempts to explain my statements fall flat, as you knew they would. You want me to play the same game- take your statements and change the wording? That is exactly what twitter wants to do to everyone- so why are you playing the ‘twitter game of rewriting people’s comments’? Likely it is fear and cowardice that motivate your deception. But I support your right to exist in whatever fantasy universe you choose, I am picturing you as Toad King of Toad Hall right now! The Royal Crown of Toad Hall looks great on you, your majesty! Riivet!

  425. Rosie says:
    @anon

    Whereas Rosie’s superior female is more likely to murder them before they’ve even begun.

    Another pathetic ruse misogynists resort to: pretending that an eary-term abortion is the moral equivalent of the sadistic rape and murder of an innocent, terrified little child.

    Of course, if bel Riose gets his way and men are allowed to decide whether a woman gets an abortion, men will be carting women off to the clinic by the millions so they don’t have to suffer the indignity of being called upon to support their children.

  426. Rosie says:
    @Reg Cæsar

    Are you saying some women are more equal than others?

    Yes, to wit, the ones who are dead don’t get a say.

    Irrelevant. We would have been better off with their fathers in their lives.

    Magic dick theory. No matter how useless and dysfunctional a man is, his mere presence on the couch has a salutary effect on his children. Nevermind that he’s a useless criminal and/or drug addict himself.

  427. anon[653] • Disclaimer says:

    @Nancy #406

    “I have to admit that long ago it occurred to me that women might actually be superior to men, because we make people…”

    Don’t forget to take credit for all the bad *men* you’ve made: Michelle Obama, Hillary Clinton, Madeline Albright, Lizze Borden, Lucretia Borgia, Victoria Nudelman, Nancy Pelosi. . .

    • Replies: @anon
  428. @Alrenous

    100 % agree brother! It’s all about attention whoring.

  429. Rosie says:
    @Jeff M. Smith

    Sorry I forgot to click reply, but see comment 419.

    • Replies: @Jeff M. Smith
  430. Anon[956] • Disclaimer says:
    @bwuce wee

    I agree with your notes, having worked in nightclub and music scenes for some decades. People on the outside, who think of themselves as “allies”, are pretty clueless that the apparent “rainbow” LGBTIQLMNOP community is an illusion. For it is bitterly divided with multiple lines of jealousy, resentments and hatreds; from people who identify as one label towards those with other labels. I witnessed that the women are the most common and the worst of the bullies. And violence among lesbians is worse than other relationships.

    These figures on the high rates of abusive relationships are from a 2011 report by the AIDS Council of NSW (Australia’s most populated state) to a NSW Government inquiry:
    “The Private lives report found that 41% of lesbian relationships and 28% of same sex attracted men had experienced some form of abuse in their current or previous relationships…
    61.8% of transgender males and 42.9% of intersex females reported having been abused in a relationship… it is likely, given the relationship profile of the samples that a significant amount occurred in same sex relationships…
    The impacts of domestic violence on GLBT victims… are similar to those of heterosexual victims but are exacerbated by homophobia, transphobia, heterocentrism and the isolation that many GLBT people experience…”

    Source: “Inquiry into Domestic Violence Trends and issues in New South Wales [Australia]”, 2011 – at https://www.parliament.nsw.gov.au/committees/DBAssets/InquirySubmission/Body/43463/Submission%2046.pdf

  431. Bel Riose says:
    @The Real World

    But you’re careful to avoid answering my questions, aren’t you? And with good reason — you’ve been intellectually checkmated, and you know it. Hence your reluctance to respond.

    Your silence is a tacit acknowledgement that you’ve lost our little duel. You can’t disprove my assertion that women bear at least as much responsibility for an unwanted pregnancy as a man does, and in fact, you dare not even try to do so.

    As for your latest drivel:

    “If she can be responsible enough to keep his bodily fluids away from her particular body part.”

    There — fixed it for you again!

    I’ll ask it again: why do you think it’s only the man’s responsibility to “keep his bodily fluids away from her particular body part?”

    The woman has some responsibility too, don’t you agree?

    In fact, if you think about it…she has MORE responsibility to avoid risky sex than the man does.

    After all — she’s the one who runs the risk of getting pregnant!

    And if she “chooses to physically engage” (pro tip: most of us call it “having sex”) without protection — well then, she’s knowingly rolling the dice — and knowingly taking a chance of getting pregnant.

    And she can bear the consequences of that decision!

    “There is only one thing that needs to not happen in all that fun to avoid a pregnancy. If she is a mature and responsible person, she will not do that one thing.”

    Fixed that for you, too.

    • Replies: @Rosie
    , @The Real World
  432. Corvinus says:
    @spacewanderer

    “Another female victim theory, lmfao”

    Western Civilization flourished with chaste men and women, not scamming pick up artists who artificially lump we men into “alpha” and “beta” categories as they see fit.

    “So your claim is that women exploiting men and destroying traditional marriage and gender norm is perfectly fine”

    No, my claim is that men exploiting women and destroying traditional marriage is beyond the pale. Next time, don’t erect a strawman.

    “Western Civilization truly deserves collapse, it must be destroyed to the ground”

    Just silly talk on your part. Do something about it then.

    “You are the worst enemy of western civilization, the retarded right-wing male feminists, not the so-called ‘Pickup Artists’.”

    The Pick Up Artists refuse to marry and sire offspring at above replacement levels. The Pick Up Artists seek to break up marriages. The Pick Up Artists seek to pump and dump women.

    • Agree: Liza
  433. Mr Gen says:

    Mate, I’m not going to blow smoke up women’s arses, but I have learnt over the last 2 years that most of the characteristics you are describing apply the total fucking idiots of either sex. Women have an oppressor mentality, at least a sizable minority. That leads to thinking of people through an ideological rather than a human based lens. And many can be cunts because of it. Never a pedestal gents. Men are the romantics, the idealists, the brightest. Women are vital, but they rarely compete with men on a level playing field.

  434. @Rosie

    I did see your reply, thank you.

    So – what we need is a good sociological analysis here. Good data on certain subjects is really hard to come by. Maybe your data is valid, maybe women really are forming relationships, at least with certain types/groups of men. But we are dealing with a complex subject where people are pushing narratives, and the problems of “incels” really have not been studied.

    You have been very busy writing, so I’ll mostly leave you alone for now. I have to respond to just one thing you wrote.

    “This assumption among your sort that citing a woman is some sort of slam dunk is silly.”

    Now I hope you don’t think I’m stupid, Rosie (well..at least not THAT stupid). And I did try to address that very issue. Although I would assume you have little time to go thru the comments section of the New York Times article, I think you’ll agree that if someone says something that is outrageously and egregiously and obviously wrong, they are not very likely to be quoted uncritically by a major publication. And that if they WERE quoted for some reason, the author of the article, not to mention the commenters in the comment section, would quickly point out that the quote is wrong. (So far it appears to be just you who disagrees.)

    But when many people talk seriously about the quote as though the quote is valid, maybe it really isn’t just the crazy opinion of just one woman cherry-picked by someone like me.

  435. @Rosie

    And here is how single White women vote as a group:

    They vote for Republicans more than any other group except White men and married White women, both of whom vote Republican. Period. Therefore, the truth of the matter is that they are the least reliable group of voters in the Democratic constituency, precisely the opposite of what you said. Therefore, what you said is not an “established fact” but a blatant falsehood.

    Well here is the thing Rosie they are 60% of all women.

    So the largest group of women is then a reliable voting bloc for Democrats.

    There are more characteristics to a voting group than what percent they vote Democrat.

    You are trying to make everything relative when there is always some group that votes at a higher percentage. The size of the bloc is equally if not more important. If I point out that toy train operators vote Democrat nearly 95% of the time does it really matter?

    Blacks vote Democrat at a higher rate but their *actual voters* are a smaller percentage nationwide than White women.

    Democrats can expect single White women to show up to the polls and vote Democrat. You can’t escape their voting power by playing pedantic games. In fact the more you avoid an obvious truth the more it is revealed. Obama and Biden would not have won without White single women.

    If it makes you feel any better I don’t hold White women entirely responsible for our political situation. But they do get majority responsibility for certain areas, specifically public education and certain areas of media. As I said before the most left-wing departments might as well be women’s colleges. I don’t think it is the end of the world if we consider the mere possibility that White women are more vulnerable to liberalism by nature and especially if they aren’t married.

    It’s not “by chance” that the majority of feminist leaders are homely White women. They have extremely limited access to White men and turn their bitterness towards serving establishment fiction.

    This is the other problem with “female hypergamy.” It ignores the fact that men are at least as particular as women about mate selection, only about particularly shallow and meaningless things.

    I have never said that hypergamy is a problem that is endemic to all women. I have no doubt that the temptation happens more to women that have a lot of male options.

    Blaming picky men for the existence of bitter feminists is no different than blaming women for bitter incels. Just because the other gender makes you angry doesn’t give you the right to declare a gender war. Society is fine with criticizing incels/manosphere but it is completely taboo to question the underlying motivations of feminists. In Academia or the MSM you could lose your job for even suggesting that bitterness plays a role in a feminist politics. We are supposed to just believe it is “by chance” that so many are single or lesbian. However men in politics can be openly depicted as being driven by a depraved sexuality. Modern society tries to maintain a liberal fantasy where women exist in some evolution free state while only men inherited baser instincts. I have no doubt this fantasy will eventually be destroyed by research. Will America still be standing by the time all these egalitarian lies are demolished is the question.

  436. @Nancy

    Now please don’t take this the wrong way…

    Does dirt make plants?

    • Replies: @Nancy
  437. @The Real World

    They learned that it’s a public brow-beating way to try to keep women subjugated…

    Yawn… Everywhere in the English-speaking world, perhaps throughout all Christendom, women are more religious than men. If this is “subjugation”, an awful lot of women seem to be be begging for it.

    Unlike in democratic Europe, North America’s abortion policy has been decided by courts. So technically, it violates women’s suffrage.

    To control fertile adults.

    Civilization hangs on this.

    What do you mean by each of those?

    Men do not bother with the numbing labor of building a civilization until they have solid families to build for. This is why marriage is universal among otherwise vastly different societies. (And why it has never applied to queers. Why would it?)

    I don’t know your politics or ethnological views, and won’t assume any. But it is more than amusing to come to Unz.com and see countless commenters rail about Jews-this and Jews-that, while in full agreement with them on elective abortion and related items. No self-awareness there.

    Similarly, progressives at Quora.com and other forums love to lash into Ayn Rand and her followers for being selfish while holding to Miss Rand’s sexual ethics in every way themselves.

  438. @Sparkon

    Kitty Kelly

    Enough said.

    • Replies: @Sparkon
  439. Rosie says:

    Well here is the thing Rosie they are 60% of all women.

    No, single White women are not 60% of all women. That is statistically impossible since Whites are only 61.6% of the population, and most White women are married.

    Maybe you meant 60% of women voters?

    The size of the bloc is equally if not more important.

    If the single White female voting blocs is so large and influential, maybe you should stop demonizing and insulting them.

    But really how large of a voting blocs is it? The entire White female share of the electorate is only 35%. Married people vote more than unmarried people, and White women marry more than women of all other groups except Asians (about 57%). I’ll be generous and assume that single White women constitute 17% of the electorate. The non-White share of the electorate is one third.

    The non-white share of the electorate s not only much more reliably Democrat but almost twice as large, and getting larger EVERY SINGLE ELECTION, while the White female share gets smaller. Yet, you single out single White women for extra special scorn, and you accuse me of “playing pedantic games” for pointing out how stupid this is.

    Obama and Biden would not have won without White single women.

    And they wouldn’t have won without non-Whites, either.

    Of course, we both know none of this matters anyway. Their Republican opponents were never going to do anything for Whites anyway. White male loyalty to the Republicans has done nothing but enable them to continue their gift.

    specifically public education

    Women don’t run the public schools. They do what their male superintendents tell them to do. They don’t even get to choose the textbooks they use.

    Women who become teachers often do so precisely because they are more or less traditional and they are looking for a career that family-friendly. They are not women’s studies radicals or critical race theory types by nature.

    certain areas of media

    Oy vey!

    Just because the other gender makes you angry doesn’t give you the right to declare a gender war.

    Don’t you think there are other people on this thread who need to hear this more than I do?

    Modern society tries to maintain a liberal fantasy where women exist in some evolution free state while only men inherited baser instincts. I have no doubt this fantasy will eventually be destroyed by research.

    Good grief! You sound like a desperate egalitarian waiting for that magical intervention that closes the gap and vindicates the truth of universal equality once and for all. Well, I must say I’m skeptical. But don’t take it too hard. As I’ve said before, women are more likely to be saints. Men are more likely to be heroes. It’s fine.

  440. Rosie says:
    @Bel Riose

    you’ve been intellectually checkmated,

    You’re too stupid to intellectually checkmate anyone.

    In fact, if you think about it…she has MORE responsibility to avoid risky sex than the man does.

    After all — she’s the one who runs the risk of getting pregnant!

    The person who bears the primary responsibility to avoid pregnancy is the person who intends to whine, important, pout, and manipulate until they get the casual sex they’re after, i.e. the man.

    Lol just kidding!

    Sort of, OK no actually I’m dead serious.

    The girls who have unplanned pregnancies are often the very ones who are most conservative about sex. They didn’t use birth control because they weren’t planning on having sex. If you keep on keepin’ on until you get the answer you want, and then wind up a baby daddy, you’ve got noone to blame but yourself.

  441. @Bel Riose

    What questions? When some kid comes on here with a copy/pasted list from the internet of birth control methods to try to educate the adults about what they are, there was no point in reading the rest of the immature screed.

    And you left off your adorable list the oldest pregnancy prevention method (and still used) since the beginning of humanity. Color me not shocked that you are unaware.

    In time, you’ll learn that the realities of life are quite a bit different than in your imagined world — where males bear no responsibility for their choices and actions. Time to ditch those comic books. For sure, you are not yet ready for adult physical activity so, best keep your drawers zipped for several more years. You aren’t ready for that responsibility; you’ve made that clear.

    (No point in reading past three sentences of that meltdown above either. Now, go ahead and top off this exchange with more of the same. I know you need the last wailing word.)

  442. Spot on commentary. And when speaking of privilege, can you think of a more privileged and entitled group than White Western Women of the past 75 years or so? The World is their oyster, but never any heavy lifting required.

    • Replies: @The Real World
  443. anarchyst says:

    I’m going to open up another can of worms. I am sure that “Rosie” will have something to say…
    The Michigan State University “gymnast abuse case” involving the “doctor” Nassar comes to mind. If he was guilty of the acts he is accused of, he deserves his punishment.
    That being said…
    In my humble opinion, Nassar was used as a “poster boy” for the “women are victims” movement.
    He may or may not have been guilty of the “crimes” that he is accused of…there is no way to prove it one way or another. It’s all hearsay that was accepted as “fact”.
    Questions about this situation abound but are never asked…
    –Where were the PARENTS? Were the parents so involved in their child’s athletic success that they either “looked the other way” or in reality, did none of it ever happen? Did the women ever confide in their parents about a questionable situation?
    –Were these “exams” done under normal ethical bounds?
    –Is it possible that these women “came under the doctor’s spell” and actively sought out sexual activity with the doctor? Many teenage girls would “love” the “attention” of a doctor.
    As to 200 victims, I am sure that the number is a lot less, if any. I am still skeptical of not only the “deeds” but the number of “victims”.
    It is interesting to note that the mainstream media called the women “survivors” rather than the proper term–“victims“. “Survivors” are those who survive death or grievous bodily harm. The girls did not suffer death or grievous bodily harm. Hence, the proper term would be “victims“, not “survivors“.
    The incorrect term was used to lend “gravitas” to the situation and to make it sound worse than it really was.
    All one has to do is observe the number of pedestrians who “get on the bus” after a bus accident in order to file claims. It is likely that this was the same situation.
    It is a safe bet that there were many women who were not “molested”, but being on the team, chose to claim “molestation” for the money.
    Follow the money…

    • Replies: @The Real World
  444. Sparkon says:
    @Reg Cæsar

    Enough said.

    Not really, Reg, but nice try attacking the source, and dodging the fact that Selene Walters confirmed that Ronald Reagan raped her.

    I know a lot about Ronnie Reagan’s escapades, and there a lot more. I think he’d easily qualify as a philanderer, if not a sexual predator.

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2943309/Rampant-Ronald-Reagan-Former-president-ladies-man-Hollywood-days-new-book-lays-save-affairs-stars-Doris-Day-Lana-Turner-Monroe.html

    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar
  445. may says:

    Reducing the number of white females on the planet might actually be a good thing for humanity.

  446. Anonymous[328] • Disclaimer says:
    @The Real World

    ROFL! That is 100% complete nonsense. Yet, you believe it and that is the truly irrational and scary thing. Every single year in America there are thousands of people murdered, untold numbers of men, women, children and animals assaulted and maimed, property destroyed, people raped, ETC. and all of that is because of the unhinged, utterly irrational emotions of men.

    Gee, gal. Your primary reaction to a logical argument appears to be emotional.

    Old joke:
    Man walks into a bar, says loudly to a friend “Women take everything personally”, at which point half the women in the bar stand up and say “I do not!”

    • Replies: @The Real World
  447. @Vergissmeinnicht

    The linked article states that it equates church attendance to religiosity, but that sort of equivalency might be faulty. I’ve known people who don’t believe in religion, yet still attend church, because it has a social function to them.

  448. Anon[256] • Disclaimer says:
    @Ktulu

    Stated with such certainty! What you mean is God is not known by you, probably due to a host of pathological influences and behaviors.

  449. bwuce wee says:
    @Truth

    i did preface with ‘quick FUZZY MATH’, meaning i merely did approximate calculations. but apparently english is not your first language! if you want me to calculate the exact numbers to 4 decimal places for you, send me a money order for \$50- that ought to cover my time. i await your payment, unless you are all talk…

    • Replies: @Truth
  450. bwuce wee says:
    @Arminius1933

    yes, FAST! i proved that there are ‘more blacks on welfare than there are whites on welfare’. proven. i did it fast, if i had taken more time, i would have proven even more about welfare. it is a scam. so i did what i said i would do. i backed up my shit. suck it up. as far as firefighters go- what does that have to do with ‘blacks vs whites on welfare’, unless you are claiming there is no such thing as a black firefighter? if so, prove it! i would like to know the facts. many of the supposed wildfires that devastate our country are intentionally started by- wait for it- firefighters! but i cannot blame all firefighters, just like i cannot blame all cops when they murder people every day. and disability scams- those are under the social security system, and don’t take my word for it, but there are a great many blacks who are scamming the social security administration with their ‘disablities’. sort of an ethnic career, just like welfare.

    • Replies: @Arminius1933
  451. Truth says:
    @bwuce wee

    Truthfully, Old Sport, I don’t think that it takes Blaise Pascal to realize that if ““The majority of SNAP recipients, 38.6% to be precise, are Caucasian.” that there would be more of them than of any other group.

    • Replies: @bwuce wee
  452. @Anonymous

    I am spot-on and you will notice that no male on here, nor the article author whom I have asked three times, will address the following:

    Every single year in America there are thousands of people murdered, untold numbers of men, women, children and animals assaulted and maimed, property destroyed, people raped, ETC. and all of that is because of the unhinged, utterly irrational emotions of men.

    Now, you will not either and attempt to deflect and turn it into a personality thing.

    Be a man and address the issue. Why the unhinged emotions and neanderthal violence from too many males instead of using their famed “logic and reason”?

    • Replies: @Kali
  453. @Cienfuegos

    You clearly live in a cave, by yourself, and have little understanding of the outside world.

    The article was mostly stupid like so many are these days. It is an attempt to portray a small segment of the population to be a significant number. That is a fail from the start.

    It is also meant to DIVIDE people and as you can see from the comment thread it has accomplished that. Both of those are a ridiculous premise to write an article.
    All media is full of this dreck in this era. Apparently, you are so accustomed to it, and undiscerning in general, that you cannot distinguish valid info from smoke and mirrors.

    But, congrats, this – “The World is their oyster, but never any heavy lifting required.” is probably the dumbest sentence on this entire thread and there is plenty of competition here for that accolade.

  454. @anarchyst

    There is no valid reason for anyone to directly respond to your fevered, utterly absurd screed.

    You, like too many others here and elsewhere, simply have little clue about the real world. Media owns your brain not direct interaction with people and the world.

    Even worse than that is that you seem to think you have a birthright to simply make things up and expect others to believe them or take them seriously. You are sadly mistaken on both counts.

    You should probably spend some money on a good psychotherapist. Follow that money…

    • Troll: anarchyst
    • Replies: @Anon
  455. The feminists in this comment section, especially the “male” feminists, are making the case about contemporary women better than anyone could have. Belligerent, anti-intellectual, deranged, etc…

  456. @Sparkon

    Yeah, yeah, and he cut taxes for the “rich” (which implies that they were paying some), and sold out to the NRA by opposing handgun prohibition, and was unfair and insulting to the faultless Soviet and Grenadian governments, and “anti-Semitic” by doing the Christian thing at Bitburg, etc, etc.

    My policy is to give a politician the benefit of the doubt on the first charge. It’s called “he said, she said” for a reason. True predators don’t stop at one. When the accusations stack up is when to pay attention. As for a movie star whose wife dumped him for another man finding solace in the arms of women throwing themselves at him, well, few of us could resist the temptation.

    • Replies: @Sparkon
  457. Anon[291] • Disclaimer says:
    @The Real World

    There is no valid reason for anyone to directly respond to your fevered, utterly absurd screed.

    And yet, you addressed exactly ZERO of his questions, just a ‘screed’ of ad hom & invective – it’s as if you’re nothing more than a typical dumb mouthy broad engaged in projection . . . probably with a PhD in some bullshit.

    • Agree: Kali
    • Thanks: anarchyst
  458. @Anon

    There was no point in addressing any of his worthless prattle, as I already stated. It was simply twisted magical thinking which he seems to engage in regularly.

    He, rightly, got called-out on it which seems to have triggered you. You might be one of the violent types….that no one on here has the guts to talk about. Are there any real men left; those with courage and honesty to address what is real in this world – disgusting and ongoing violence?

    Now, there is a valid question.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  459. @Anon

    Alas, the woman who so self-effacingly calls herself The Real World is one of perhaps thirty or forty commenters who have been looking at reality through the rear-view mirror as they advance farther and farther into the Emerald City. That frontier was surely crossed several hundred comments back.

    Here is a modest suggestion for restoring everyone’s perspective.*
    ______
    *WHIMSICALITY ALERT!

  460. mcohen says:

    You can bitch and moan all you like but the fact is woman have got the pussy.Not men.We got the dick.In case some of you forgot.Like this author.
    AND
    if we are denied the pussy then what?the asshole or the inflatable.you choose.

    • Replies: @The Real World
  461. anon[843] • Disclaimer says:

    @The Real World #464

    “Are there any real men left; those with courage and honesty to address what is real in this world – disgusting and ongoing violence? ”

    Oh that one’s easy. Male violence is one hundred per cent attributable to poor mothering on the part of the father. Female violence. . .well that’s some man’s fault, too.

  462. Hold your horses, men, until you understand what kind of beast you want to climb on and ride. There are two sides to patriarchy, you can’t have the respect without the responsibilities:

    Under patriarchy, if you get a girl pregnant, you marry her and support her for the rest of her life. Already married? You still have to support her, and probably have to pay a man to marry her. Your wife goes insane, or won’t give you sex? You still have to support her. She goes into debt or commits a crime? You hold the bag, dude. She has another man’s child? You call it your own. The only way out is if she goes off with another man, and even then, it may not be an out.

    Patriarchy broke down when men got jobs and friends outside of community control, working in industry and spending all their wages at the pub on the way home. Women tried to save patriarchy with temperance laws, which caused men to set up whole new ways to avoid the responsibilities of patriarchy.

    Upset that women don’t want to get married and have children? Look at the stats:

    Poverty is almost entirely feminized, some half or more of children grow up in poverty. They should be married, you say? And yet, marriage only increases men’s wealth, not their spouse’s. Men still get a “supporting family” bonus, and women still get docked for having children, but when things go wrong, the difference in pay gets called “his brilliance and commitment to work”. Women are still working longer hours, and much of that is the unpaid work that families require. If she gets a serious illness, well, over half of women get dropped by their husbands at that point. Add to that, laws about domestic violence and stalking are rarely enforced, and it looks like marriage and children are not viable in a culture where men demand respect without real responsibilities.

    If you want a change, look at the whole stable, not just the new stud some shifty salesman brought in. It is more than likely that the horses you already have are reacting to your own mismanagement! The good news, straight from the stable? If you don’t like things today, you have the power to change it.

    • Replies: @Alrenous
  463. bwuce wee says:
    @Truth

    you are trying to claim that because white people outnumber blacks by MORE THAN 5 TO 1, THAT PROVES MORE WHITES ARE ON WELFARE. the only way that comparison will work is if there are exactly the same number of whites and black in the population. which of course, is NOT the case. that is why they have statistics, so comparisons can be made accurately.

    1. number of welfare recipients= 59 million.
    2. 38% 0f 59 million= 22,420,000 whites on welfare
    25% of 59000000 = 14,750,000 blacks on welfare

    WOW! IF WE LOOK AT THAT WE MUST THINK WHITES ARE ALL ON WELFARE! but that is NOT how statistics work!

    now we have to look at what percentage of each group is on welfare, otherwise, the statistics are meaningless

    3. (231.9 million whites in US (2020)
    22,420,000 is 9.6679603277275% of 231,900,000. SO 9.6% OF all US WHITES ARE ON WELFARE. UNDER 10% of all US whites are on welfare- you follow me so far?

    4. African Americans for 24.8% of welfare recipients 12.4% Black(41.6 million total black in US (2020))
    14,750,000 is 35.456730769231% of 41,600,000.
    SO 35% OF ALL BLACKS IN THE US ARE ON WELFARE- WHICH IS MORE THAN 3 TIMES THE PERCENTAGE OF WHITES ON WELFARE!!!

    LET ME REITERATE AGAIN BECAUSE YOU CANNOT DO SIMPLE MATH OR FOLLOW A THREAD OF CONVERSATION:

    35% OF ALL BLACKS ARE ON WELFARE, WHILE LESS THAN 10% OF ALL WHITES ARE ON WELFARE!!

    the statistics show that less than 1/10 of all white people are on welfare, while MORE THAN 1/3 of all black people are on welfare.

    so let me put it in a language you can understand: 10 percent of all white people are poor white trash losers, BUT 35 percent of all black people are ghetto welfare rats! get that tatooed on your face so you won’t get mixed up again.

    i did your math homework for you, and SO NOW YOU OWE ME \$50. pay up sucker!

    • Replies: @Truth
  464. @CelestiaQuesta

    About 40% on Radix Journal use to say this kind of BS, and Richard Spencer turned out to be a Fake Right tool from the Bush era Deep State.
    I have about 10 females in my extended family, and not one has ever chased after “Black cock” or even desired to date Blacks. My sister was attracted to charming White guys like that, and she paid the price of him spreading his wealth to 2 other women he had children by. It wasn’t just his size, as he was legit a charmer, and before he became my brother-in-law I said to him, “I like you as a friend, but you’ll make a terrible husband/father for my sister and your kids.”
    When my sister passed away 2 years ago, I went to the funeral and two of her children were there. Her youngest son said that he despised her and didn’t consider her his mother anymore, and her daughter had resentments, said she still cared for my sister, then fell short of declaring love for her. I believe her son was a bit too harsh, yet not completely unfair, and her daughter was completely fair.
    My sister was my best friend growing up, and as a “tomboy”, but not a feminist she was more like another buddy than a sister. She actually mentored me in reading. The Southern Kids (the neighbor
    guys until 12 were all from the South) and we let her in on our baseball and adventures about half the time, but never football, wrestling or play fights. I never figured she’d go “boy crazy” at about 13 1/2, but it’s the hormones you see, with girls as well as guys. The desire to marry a male for size, in those days, was a sign of underclass ignorance, as my sister and I grew up in a “housing project” where kids murdered other kids.
    OTOH, from what I’ve seen, all the propaganda of mixed couples in advertising, etc., has had only small effect on most real middle-class girls. Yet on Radix 6 years ago, all kinds of Gammas were claiming they couldn’t find any good women, as they were all taken by Blacks.

    • Replies: @Truth
  465. Anymike says:
    @Tucker

    Nevertheless, the party that holds the presidency always loses House seats in the midterm election. Even an anemic performance, a gain of say 15 seats, would guarantee the Republicans control of the House for the last two years of Biden’s term.

    More likely, there will be a gain of at least 25 seats. Actually, 25 would qualify as an anemic gain. If Biden is demented enough to run for reelection and the voters are demented enough to reelected him, the Republicans are just about guaranteed control of the House for the next six years. Control of the House means nothing happens unless you sign on to it.

    I agree, though, that the depths of establishment Republican stupidity are almost unlimited. If nothing else, they just don’t know how to build a firewall.

  466. Truth says:
    @GenerallyPattoned

    I have about 10 females in my extended family, and not one has ever chased after “Black cock” or even desired to date Blacks.

    You’ve taken them aside individually, and asked?

  467. Truth says:
    @bwuce wee

    you are trying to claim that because white people outnumber blacks by MORE THAN 5 TO 1, THAT PROVES MORE WHITES ARE ON WELFARE

    More whites are on welfare.

    1. number of welfare recipients= 59 million.
    2. 38% 0f 59 million= 22,420,000 whites on welfare
    25% of 59000000 = 14,750,000 blacks on welfare

    Math wasn’t my best subject, but I believe 22,420,000 is more than 14,750,000.

    3. (231.9 million whites in US (2020)
    22,420,000 is 9.6679603277275% of 231,900,000. SO 9.6% OF all US WHITES ARE ON WELFARE. UNDER 10% of all US whites are on welfare- you follow me so far?

    4. African Americans for 24.8% of welfare recipients 12.4% Black(41.6 million total black in US (2020))
    14,750,000 is 35.456730769231% of 41,600,000.

    etc….etc…etc…

    35% OF ALL BLACKS ARE ON WELFARE, WHILE LESS THAN 10% OF ALL WHITES ARE ON WELFARE!!

    I’m still afraid not Old Sport. You see, Dutch Regan told you a bunch of lies because he knew you were an imbecile. MOST welfare money in this country is corporate, and it goes, almost 100% to Honk-ez.

    https://thinkbynumbers.org/government-spending/corporate-vs-social-welfare/

  468. @mcohen

    ROFL!! I do have to thank you for the comic relief….that was priceless.

    As you can see, this thread is full of lots of simple nattering and cluelessness (with some exceptions) so the levity is appreciated!

  469. @bwuce wee

    I tried to be diplomatic and appeal to reason in a respectful and urbane manner as befitting two sapient gentlemen engaged in a healthy debate. Apparently, that was a decidedly quixotic approach given the other party to this thread. Therefore, the gloves are now officially off , you fucking retarded imbecile. You make Corki from Life Goes On look like a Nobel laureate in thermodynamics.

    As I have already pointed out, and as another commenter reiterated, whites form the PLURALITY of all the welfare recipients in the United States, they are NUMERICALLY THE LARGEST SINGLE GROUP ON WELFARE. Since whites are numerically the majority of the United States population, they also have the LOWEST RATE of welfare use than any other group, even though they are the most numerous group of welfare recipients. Either you fried half your brain cells smoking crack and hanging out with Hunter Biden, or the concept of whites being most of the welfare recipients while having the lowest rate of welfare use at the same time is something that your feeble little brain simply cannot process. And ( God how I hate repeating myself; it is so tedious) we are only talking about formal welfare programs, and not welfare programs such as SSI, where whites are the OUTRIGHT MAJORITY of recipients, at 51 percent. Unless you’re concerned about burning too many of those remaining g synapses trying to comprehend an article on the subject from a mainstream media source, then find the link to a very recent article by the magazine, Business Insider. And next time that you decide to talk out of your ass, please try not to fart so loud.
    https://www-businessinsider-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.businessinsider.com/welfare-policy-created-white-wealth-largely-leaving-black-americans-behind-2020-8?amp_js_v=a6&amp_gsa=1&amp&usqp=mq331AQKKAFQArABIIACAw%3D%3D#aoh=16546461845577&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.businessinsider.com%2Fwelfare-policy-created-white-wealth-largely-leaving-black-americans-behind-2020-8

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  470. @Tucker

    I have not read through the whole thread, but I got to this one, and BRAVO, Tucker! I agree with every bit of it.

  471. Sparkon says:
    @Reg Cæsar

    As for a movie star whose wife dumped him for another man finding solace in the arms of women throwing themselves at him, well, few of us could resist the temptation.

    I can only agree with that, and it didn’t take a divorce for me to enjoy it. Finding solace, as you put it, was certainly much better than getting dumped.

    But I never checked in to a place like The Garden of Allah.

    even the would-be President Ronald Reagan stayed at the hotel, where he bedded so many women that he once told a friend ‘I woke up one morning and I couldn’t remember the name of the gal that I was in bed with.’

    …and I certainly never had that lapse of memory.

    So the big question here is this: With all these glamorous, amorous dames available to the President of the Screen Actor’s Guild, how in the name of BJs did mousey little Nancy Davis, not the other Nancy Davis, win the Gipper’s hand?

    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar
  472. Anonymous[328] • Disclaimer says:
    @The Real World

    Are there any real men left; those with courage and honesty to address what is real in this world – disgusting and ongoing violence?

    Now, there is a valid question.

    OK, and here’s a valid answer.

    Once upon a time, I sat through a presentation that emphasized the right of any woman an an Army infantry unit to have sex with anybody she chose, and the utter lack of right of anybody to object. We were told to intervene if anybody (former boyfriend, for example) tried to object.

    So I asked, being kind of interested in intervening:
    Q: “What legal protection are you going to give me when I intervene? Am I protected from legal charges if the person attacks me?”
    A: “None.”
    and they spent the entire rest of the meeting trying to convince me not to intervene. The prospect that I might intervene, lose a fight and be hospitalized, and mention that they had encouraged such behavior, frightened them badly.

    It was one of the high points of my stay at that particular organization.

    But that answers your question. The “real men left; those with courage and honesty to address what is real in this world” are considered by criminals. The same people who say that you are a social construct rather than a real authentic entity, say that those who would protect you are criminals.

    A couple of times I have intervened. The woman in question in each case acted grateful for about two minutes, then cut off contact. Apparently, the women also thought that I was a criminal.

    Without commenting on the validity the “Criminal” accusation, I remark that this accusation cuts down on the incidents. Women can get beaten up, but the rescuers aren’t charged with criminal behavior (since there are no rescuers), and the total number of criminals per incident is reduced from two (assailant and rescuer) to one (assailant), a 50% total reduction in crime, so everybody is happen (maybe even the woman, who has associated with only one criminal rather than two). Men in general get the idea that helping is criminal, and, ah, participate in the societal effort to reduce crime.

    If you want some specific behavior, do not punish it. If you want somebody to come running to help you, don’t signal your request for aid by shooting that person in the leg, or even promising to shoot that person in the leg later.

    Do I come across as furious over this state of affairs? If so, the impression is accurate. If you don’t like the rescuer being treated as criminal, then do something about it. I can’t, being a man, thus a member of an oppressive class. If you can’t either, then learn to love it, ’cause it’s here for the rest of your life.

  473. anarchyst says:
    @Anon

    @The Real World is probably a “cat lady” with nothing better to do…lol

  474. @Sparkon

    With all these glamorous, amorous dames available to the President of the Screen Actor’s Guild, how in the name of BJs did mousey little Nancy Davis, not the other Nancy Davis, win the Gipper’s hand?

    Ask Yoko.

    • Replies: @Sparkon
  475. Sparkon says:
    @Reg Cæsar

    Ono Yoko played Lennon’s muse for great songs like “Imagine,” “Give Peace a Chance,” and “The Ballad of John & Yoko, while Nancy played Ronnie’s “Mommie Poo Pants.”

    No telling when the old boy began losing his marbles.

    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar
  476. @Truth

    Why are so many Americans on welfare? I thought it was a land of opportunity. Surely you won’t allow more immigrants into your country until you make sure everyone inside your borders is gainfully employed.

    • Replies: @Alrenous
  477. Truth says:

    This truly was becoming the land of opportunity after WWII, then in the 60’s we had about a four punch combination to destroy initiative.

    1- Creation of the quasi-government Big Box store in 1962; Khols, Walmart, K-Mart and Target all started within a few months of each other in different parts of the country. This was done to destroy small business.

    2- Immigration reform, which lowered salaries and pushed money upward.

    3- Civil rights which syphoned off the 10% of the black population which would have started business and put them to work for corporations.

    4- The War on Drugs, which was really the war on Americans susceptible to drug use; and the government controlled import of “illegal” drugs for the ghetto, and later legal drugs for Main Street.

    5- The demonic, dumbing-down influence of TV was perfected. Too make people stupid, and lazy.

  478. Kali says:
    @The Real World

    Hello TRW,

    Yet, across many of your posts here, you seem a bit defensive about it.

    Thank you for your forthright comment. I do apreciate it.

    As ever, the way other people see us and the way we see ourselves is seldome the same. – I would tend to criticise myself more for being way too evangelical about my life choices. And not only my choices, but my veiwpoint also. – But I forgive myself this flaw because the times that we are living through, it seems to me, demand some radical reconstruction of the way we live our lives, if we are to live as free men and women.

    Although, more and. more, I wonder if this is even possible at our current level of evolution. – Maybe it’s this looming doubt that you are picking up on and interpreting as deffensiveness?

    I shake my head, this is the 21st century and, finally, women have the freedom to make broad choices and it’s bad enough that many men still would prefer to limit them but, to also have women wish they would cater primarily to roles those provincial women think are appropriate? It’s truly astonishing and suggests some degree of self-loathing on your part. Perhaps spend more time thinking about that.

    The focus of my comment was the differences/complimentaries between male and female energies. Surely it is within the household that these differences ought to be utilised to the advantge of the whole family, and by extention, the wider community? My intention is not to “limit the chioces of women”, but to recognise that when we work to our strengths, everybody wins – including more masculine women, and more femanine men. At the heart of the whole thing is the recognition of individual and group energetic differences, and working in acoordance with those energies.

    Too be clear, I “loathed myself” (which is to say was constantly depressed and anxious) more when attempting to fit into an economic box for which I was not suited.

    I had no free choise in that matter – the world had “imancipated” me out of my natural domain, the home, and into the workplace, for the benefit of a capitalist system which I truly do loath.

    So the freedom of which you speak was a prison all of it’s own. as it is for so many women and families.

    As things stand for me now, I am free to choose for myself if I wish to cook dinner tonight. The only consequences for me not doing so is that hubby will likely settle for eating bread and cheese, which he loves. but which I know will not provide him the nutritional ballance he needs. – Right now he’s out cutting hey – hard phyrical work which he does because it needs to be done, and which he does not ask for my help with because he knows 1. that I wouldn’t refuse, and 2. that it would physically hurt me. So my free choice is to cook a proper, nutricious and tasty meal.
    In the meantime I’ll tend my gardens and tend the goats. Later I’ll have a long soak in a hot bath – which I can do because hubby designed and engineered a system to bring water down the mountain directly to our home.

    women have the freedom to make broad choices

    Such as? And to what end if those choices do not bring fulfilment?

    That suggests that you are not entirely secure about your choices and, it seems, your preferred way of trying to deal with that is to suggest that women who don’t tend towards your life path – ‘aren’t doing it right and are defying their nature’. That is a vastly provincial way of seeing the world and is like a viewpoint from a prior century.

    I think you are projecting here. Throughout hundreds of comments on this website, I’ve probably touched on the gender question all of two or three times, including now.

    How many women or men do you know that have looked to see what their nature even is?

    The unavoidable truth is that the overwhelming majority of people, certaily from the “civilised west”, do not know their own nature, never having taken the time to study it, “know yourself” being the one essential perogative that we generally tend to avoid.

    So when I speak of the energetic differences between men and women, your responce is totacitly suggest that the “progressive” trajectory of the west is rightious in and of itself without question. I dissagree.

    Ealier in this thread Rosie bristled when someone refered to a biblical exhortation that women and children “obey” their husbands and fathers, and though I agree with her that blind “obedience” to authority is a disempowering, and frankly ridiculour notion, I gave the issue some thought and realised that – again, when we opporate within the natural male/female active/receptive balance, then ultimately deferment to authority* makes for an easier, more satisfying and more fulfilling life.

    (* Not the supposed authority of “might makes right”, but the actual author-ity of subject and strength.)

    Earlier in this comment I refered to “my domain”: that’s to say that within the home, mine is the final word, because I am the manager of this space. I decide and create the order here. When something is lacking Hubby provides it to the best of his ability (sometimes with the joke “you don’t have to keep reminding me every six months!”)

    But the practical and economic activities which provide for it are predominantly my husbands domain, and though he listens to me on all matters, ultimately I deffer to his best judgement, even when I disagree with him. And because he is an inelligent man, not to mention strong and hardworking, who knows himself, and acts acording to his nature and his conscience, he is almost always proven right in the long-run.

    But because people are, largely unconsciously, running a culturally engineered programme, the tendancy to react reflexively to certain queues prevents deeper thought and examination of what is real, what is true, what may be truly beneficial.

    Kind regards,
    Kali.

  479. bwuce wee says:
    @Truth

    nope. you are a liar, and you are in total denial. this thread is about STATISTICS. and statistics is exactly what i have been talking about since the beginning of this thread! your failure was you did not understand the subject matter. that is called POOR READING COMPREHENSION. here is my first statement which began this thread:

    ‘uh-oh- here we go with trying to make a point with statistics. unfortunately for you, you do not understand how statistics work. they are designed to obfuscate and prove either side of the argument. so without further ado- here we go:’

    so i warned everyone from the gitgo that i was discussing statistics, and you failed to comprehend the subject matter. if you are not discussing statistics, then you are off-topic for this thread. the statistics prove that the proportion of whites on welfare is waaaay less than the proportion of blacks on welfare. turned out really bad for you. AND NOW YOU OWE ME \$50, which of course you are trying to get out of paying, you pahtetic cheapass little chisler! so now, HOW DOES THAT CROW TASTE, LOSER?

    • Replies: @Truth
  480. Kali says:
    @The Real World

    I was skimming through the comments on this thread in stunned disbelief at some of the things I was reading – particularly your suggestion that all 18 year old males get vacectomies, and fouture families be artificially created with the assistance of men (and women, doubless) in white coats.

    I take it that in the “real” world in which you exist, nature, and all that it encompasses, is something to be overcome and subjugated to the socio-scientific scalple.

    Before responding I thought Id take a look at your other comments for context. And just two comments in, I see such a glaringly obvious oversight which requires a little discussion if we are to, once and for all, put an end to this ridiculous, culturally engineered, battle of the sexes… P.S. This is nothing personal, it’s just that the points you raise struck a chord with me.

    You say:

    You know, those emotions they claim are so well-measured and appropriate but, in fact, account thousands of murders every year in the USA, countless assaults of men, women, children and animals, destruction of property, rapes, bar fights and on and on.

    And, on the surface, you are right. Men do commit more violent crime than women.

    But the question must surely be, why is that? Could it not be because men have been systematically disempowered, delegitimised, and removed from their natural role as economic provider and physical protector? Could it have anything to do with the fact that boys and men are encouraged to swallow down and bottle up their emotions?Could it not be that in this crazy, fucked-up world, men are no longer permitted to be Men, and lacking an outlet (spectator sports and televised wars nowithstanding) for their natural enegies, they tend to degrade themselves further?

    Could it be that the cultural engineers have thrown every natural energy out of balance, whilst at the same time flooding our hyper-sexualised societies with hard drugs, including alcohol and prescription drugs? Could it not be that this imbalance has huge knock-on effects, for both men and women and children and our wider societies?

    The fact is, that unless we get back to first principles – women are physically and energetically built for gestating and feeding infants; men are physically and energetically built for bringing home the bacon and protecting the family – and try to work things out from there, this infernal battle for dominance will continue ad infinitum.

    Of course I’m generalising because “not all men”, “not all women”. “not all jews”, not all …”.

    We live in a world in which just about everything we do is designed to serve the “economy-stupid” (ie, the bankers) and it’s political enablement. It is an artificial construct, and it is screwing us all over.

    Neither men nor women are served by this state of affairs. And neither are our children.

    If things were in natural balance, would we be seeing and experiencing such astonishing levels of violece commited by men? Would we be witnessing older women struggling to have children after decades of contraceptive pill-popping, only to find that their “choice” of career over family was misguided.

    Certainly women who wish to pursue activities outside of home-making should have the freedom to do so to the full extent of their abilites and inclinations. But when full participation in the”economy-stupid” is force on every woman to the detriment of her nature, of her family, of her husband, and when the feminista hails this imposition as “freedom”, surely the imbalance should become obvious to anyone paying close attention?

    If we manage to lay asside the culturally engineered reflexive posturing on both sides of this debate, to recognise our unique strengths, our complimentary energies, and act acordingly, then I suspect the levels of violence within our societies would all but dissapear.

    I pray for the restoration of Natural Balance and, of course, a concurrent end to the impositions of the economy-stupid and its cultural interferances.

    Best wishes,
    Kali.

    • Replies: @The Real World
  481. @Kali

    …particularly your suggestion that all 18 year old males get vacectomies, and fouture families be artificially created

    Kali, relax…it’s called an idea. Do you want to shut those down too?

    People like to think, they should be encourage to think – not kept in mental boxes as they often were in centuries past.

    As I stated, the idea will never happen because males would revolt at assuming that much responsibility and it makes far too much sense, actually. So, we will continue on with so many absurd problems caused by careless irresponsibility.

    Don’t be so threatened by mere WORDS and don’t buckle to the crazies who want to censor human thought and ideas.

    I didn’t read the rest of what you wrote because some of us have to work in the capitalist world that you detest but which feeds and provides for you.

    • Replies: @Kali
  482. Truth says:
    @bwuce wee

    this thread is about STATISTICS.

    Why no, Old Sport. This thread is about The Nature of Women and the Woke Problem.

    the statistics prove that the proportion of whites on welfare is waaaay less than the proportion of blacks on welfare. turned out really bad for you.

    And the raw dollars that whites receive, when Corporate Welfare is included, is waaaaay higher.

    AND NOW YOU OWE ME \$50,

    That’s strange I don’t remember agreeing to any wagers.

    HOW DOES THAT CROW TASTE, LOSER?

    Like chicken, I assume. Everything tastes like chicken.

    • Replies: @bwuce wee
  483. bwuce wee says:

    you keep lying and digging your hole deeper! fatal mistake.
    1. the op-ed about ‘women’ contains no less that 6 graphs showing STATISTICS. so you cannot pretend you do not know that the content of that article was based on the graphs of statistics. without the statistics, nothing in the article has any meaning, or CONTEXT. you lose there, OLD SPURT.
    2. when you reply to my post which begins with a preface about ‘statistics’, you full well knew what the subject matter was, yet you replied anyway, knowing you knew nothing about the subject matter: statistics. you lose there, OLD SPURT.
    3. when you talk about stuff you know nothing about that is called ‘talking shit’. you are guilty of that. you lose there, OLD SPURT.
    4. i informed you that if you did not like approximations, i would charge you 50 bucks to do the math- when you reply to that post, that means you accept my terms. you lose there, OLD SPURT.
    5. you pretended you knew somethng about math, and when i called you on it by demonstrating statitiscal evidence, you revealed that you do not know much about math. you lose there, OLD SPURT.
    6. you are acting exactly like a guy who bet the favorites with a bookie and a 7 point spread. your team won, and you go to collect your ‘winnings’, only problem is they won by only 5 points, so you lost your money. then you cry and whine, my team won(there are more white people on welfare), but the bookies throw your lying punk ass out on the street and now you owe them money plus interest! you lose there, OLD SPURT.
    7. of course everything tastes like chicken to you, because you have no discernment. you lose there, OLD SPURT.
    8. you just got your ass kicked- again!

  484. Truth says:

    8. you just got your ass kicked- again!

    One of these days I’ll learn my lesson about challenging the intellect of guys who don’t use capital letters, except with 5 or 10 in a row.

    • Replies: @bwuce wee
  485. Anonymous[335] • Disclaimer says:
    @Arminius1933

    Look, you’re running into the “Whiteness” argument. Incidence per member of the population is just a “Whiteness” trick to retain “Whiteness” oppression.

    The logic goes like this:
    a) There are many ways of approximating reality.
    b) People chose a way that gives them the best result (in their own judgement).
    c) The best result for any person is domination of other person or many people — slave owning.
    d) Slave owning is wrong.
    e) Thus any approximation of reality is wrong.

    To apply the above to your assertion:
    a) You assert that “Per capita welfare use” is the right measure to used in this case, and shows that White people use less welfare than Black people.
    b) You think that the right measure is the one that gives you the best result – domination over other people.
    c) You want to enslave Black people.
    d) That is wrong.
    e) Therefore, “Per capita welfare use” is a wrong measure, and should be ignored.

  486. @Sparkon

    Ono Yoko played Lennon’s muse for great songs like “Imagine”

    Someone who thinks “Imagine” is a great song is in no position to question the inventory of anyone else’s marbles.

    • Replies: @Sparkon
  487. Sparkon says:
    @Reg Cæsar

    Yeah, right, but Ronald Reagan may have been suffering from early dementia, even before he took office at age 69, the oldest elected president ever.

    Parsing Ronald Reagan’s Words for Early Signs of Alzheimer’s

    By Lawrence K. Altman, M.d.

    WASHINGTON — Even before Ronald Reagan became the oldest elected president, his mental state was a political issue. His adversaries often suggested his penchant for contradictory statements, forgetting names and seeming absent-mindedness could be linked to dementia.

    […]

    Now a clever new analysis has found that during his two terms in office, subtle changes in Mr. Reagan’s speaking patterns linked to the onset of dementia were apparent years before doctors diagnosed his Alzheimer’s disease in 1994.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/31/health/parsing-ronald-reagans-words-for-early-signs-of-alzheimers.html

    Now let’s get back to renowned Hollywood blowjob artist Nancy Reagan, and how she escaped her Communist past with Ronnie’s critical help, and became the nation’s First Lady, where she had a lot of fun recycling Christmas presents and other gifts.

    Nancy Reagan … often explained that she and the future president met cute. She had been threatened with blacklisting in the early ’50s—by mistake, she said, after having been confused with another actress who had the same name—Nancy Davis. The other Nancy Davis, Nancy and Ronald Reagan said, really was a Communist. Reagan, then president of the Screen Actors Guild, helped the first Nancy prove she wasn’t the Communist Nancy Davis, and she was able to work again. Along the way, they fell in love, and the rest is history.

    In 1987, I found the other Nancy Davis working at a snack bar in Ventura, California, and interviewed her for The Nation. When I asked about the first lady, she said, “She’s been lying about me for years…. I never was a Communist. I told Reagan back in the fifties that if she didn’t stop saying I was a Communist, I’d sue her.”

    https://www.thenation.com/article/archive/nancy-reagan-and-the-problem-of-the-two-nancys/

    So let’s just stop and think about this for a minute. Reagan helped Davis cover up her Communist past, married her despite her notorious reputation around Hollywood, and the two of them end up in the White House, where Reagan grants amnesty to 3 million illegal immigrants, and manages to triple the national debt with what his eventual VP George HW Bush called Voodoo Economics, deregulates, downsizes, outsources and offshores U.S. industry on a fast boat to China, ignores AIDS, rails against pornography and drugs, and gets Gorbachev to “tear down” that wall, in what seems to have been a scripted dismantling of the Soviet Union, and all of it with former Communist “Mommie Poo Pants” by his side.

    And Nancy had her own powerful sources. In 1988, Don Regan dropped a bombshell:

    “Virtually every major move and decision the Reagans made during my time as White House Chief of Staff was cleared in advance with a woman in San Francisco who drew up horoscopes to make certain that the planets were in a favorable alignment for the enterprise.”

    The “woman in San Francisco” was astrologer Joan Quigley. Nancy Reagan, it turned out, had been using Quigley’s services since 1981, shortly after her husband almost died in an assassination attempt.

    https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/before-john-bolton-blasted-trump-don-regan-blasted-former-boss-ronald-reagan

    So, take your time Reg. I’m sure you’ll be able to come up with some snarky response, devoted as you are to the Great Communicator.

    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar
  488. Kali says:
    @The Real World

    Kali, relax…it’s called an idea. Do you want to shut those down too?

    Only the stupid, destructive and monsterous ones such as sterilising all male 18 year olds because “responsibility”.

    Don’t be so threatened by mere WORDS

    Says the woman who refused to read mine. Can you say “projection”?

    some of us have to work in the capitalist world that you detest but which feeds and provides for you.

    Such arrogant, dishonest and self-agrandising tripe – from a woman so insecure in her convictions she can’t even take a moment to read the thoughts, ideas and words of someone challenging her (entirely predictable, entirely inculcated, postmodernist) world view.

    To be absolutely clear, little miss “real world”, neither you, nor the capitalist economy which you slave for, provides me with one iota of the necesities of my life. – Your entire system could colapse tomorrow (and very likely will!) and I will barely be affected by it.

    Please do continue to spout your ill-conciderd ideas and misbegotten words whilst avoiding reading those that you find too chaloenging to counter. Because, though you spout utter nihilistic, in-human, anti-god, anti-nature, despotic shite that is not worth concidering, you do reveal yourself on many levels, and that saves time later.

    Time for me to do some really real world work. My first crop of spuds and onions are ready to harverst.

    It’s through the cracks that the light gets in,
    Kali.

  489. @Kali

    I’m glad you’re managing with your subsistence life under the blue sky. The huge increase in the price of fuel and everything should be generating discontent in the masses but I see no response. In the past, as I keep pointing out, such price increases would have caused riots and revolutions but not these days. They can keep upping the prices of bread and everything even more and still there will be no response, when it should be: raise the price by a penny wham, bam, streets on fire. The masses are truly hopeless, everywhere. You’re lucky to have got out into the countryside and adapted in time.

    • Replies: @Kali
  490. Kali says:
    @The Real World

    I am spot-on and you will notice that no male on here, nor the article author whom I have asked three times, will address the following:

    “Every single year in America there are thousands of people murdered, untold numbers of men, women, children and animals assaulted and maimed, property destroyed, people raped, ETC. and all of that is because of the unhinged, utterly irrational emotions of men.”

    I addressed that point.

    But you were too insecure to actually read my words.

    And though I am female, my perspective is as valid as any male perspective, as I’m sure you’d be quick to point out if you weren’t so busy defensively trolling the thread with hysteric, reactionary invectives.

    Best regards,
    Kali.

    • Replies: @The Real World
  491. Which also brings to mind a very important point I’m tempted to write about in detail someday, if it weren’t so thoroughly depressing to write. There is an Achilles heel of feminism, something which exposes their corruption and ill intentions so completely, were it understood, it would mean their end. Everyone recoils at misogyny. Many of us grew up in homes, saw it and did everything to prevent it as we became adults. There is no question that the absolute worst, most destructive misogynists are not who society points to as the usual suspects, namely men. One group stands out the most when it comes to encouraging rape by being soft on the crime and covering it up for select individuals. Feminists themselves are the ultimate misogynists and it’s time they’ve no longer been able to hide from their series crimes against women. Rape is tolerated by feminists because it is their tool to express hatred of other women and themselves. This explains countries like Sweden, this explains the insane new “just say you’re sorry” laws in the United Kingdom and every other place infested with feminist sponsored sanction of sexual crimes against women. Feminists hate women so much they are intent on erasing womanhood through allowing transgendered to steal their recognition in sports, claiming men can get pregnant etc. They hate themselves and the very concept of femininity and want to destroy it. The ultimate expression of misogyny, pure unrestrained hatred of women is feminism.

    • Replies: @The Real World
  492. @A Competent Physicist

    Here’s the problem with many articles and comment threads about feminism. It’s that writers are likely using 8 varying definitions of what constitutes ‘feminism’.

    So, people have their viewpoints, which is fine, of course, but what definition of the underlying term are they tying their opinion to? What definition are you using?

    Btw, rape isn’t tolerated by anyone except males. They get bothered about it when it happens to a female in their life but, to strangers or as a general occurrence? No, they clearly aren’t bothered. I wonder how many fathers have distinct and repeated conversations with their young sons about what rape is, why it’s wrong, etc.? Probably very few, don’t you think?

    This explains countries like Sweden, this explains the insane new “just say you’re sorry” laws in the United Kingdom

    No, those issues aren’t about feminists being in control. Those countries operate that way because it’s part of the massive agenda unleashed years ago by the vampire squid of global Marxism.

  493. @Kali

    Relax, Kali. These threads are only about people sharing words, ideas and views. There are no shots being fired, bombs being thrown, buildings burning, etc.

    ..though I am female, my perspective is as valid as any male perspective,

    Yes, of course, it is. It is not me you need to convince of that. Perhaps it is you who doesn’t quite believe it. We both know there are plenty of males on here, and everywhere, who don’t see it that way.

    Oddly and hypocritically, you claim validity of your perspective while, just above, you instantly then attempt to denigrate mine. As if I don’t have the right to say whatever I like on here. Smh, I think you really do want to censor people and try to control information. Not good…

    • Replies: @Kali
  494. @Sparkon

    …even before he took office at age 69, the oldest elected president ever.

    So you admit Biden wasn’t elected.

    • Replies: @Sparkon
  495. @Kali

    Only the stupid, destructive and monsterous ones such as sterilising all male 18 year olds because “responsibility”.

    That would require artificial insemination to keep the race going.* How happy are the majority of prospective mothers going to be with that? As Linus Pauling said when invited to contribute to the “Nobel sperm bank”, the old way is best.

    We know a couple in which the wife suffers from an allergy to proteins in seminal fluid. They had to go to a doctor, who sent the husband’s fluid out to be cleansed of them. Their first child has a November birthdate, which inevitably leads to St Valentine’s jokes. Mom has to explain that it wasn’t all that romantic. (Happily, their second such pregnancy resulted in twins, saving them a trip.)

    sterilising

    Unless you’re an Old South reactionary such as Clyde Wilson, you’re clearly not in the States, where ideological feminism is deep and ubiquitous. Suggesting that we are indeed the worst men in the world. You rarely hear these complaints from Italian women, let alone Saudi.

    *Or teenage sires. These days, a disturbing number of teachers might be happy to go along with that.

    • Replies: @The Real World
    , @Kali
  496. Sparkon says:
    @Reg Cæsar

    So you admit Biden wasn’t elected.

    Not by 1980, he wasn’t.

  497. @Anon

    Your critique is right on target.

    But, as I assume you know, the author of the sophomoric display above is wholly besotted with that messianism for the goyim, so you’re unlikely to find any trace of your realism in his writings….

    He and his fellow disciples of Rabbi Saul of Tarsus depict the unchallenged reign of Judeo-Christianity as EuroCiv’s heyday, when in fact it was a nadir of European Civilization.

    Contrary to what these philosemitic antisemites maintain, the wellsprings of European greatness are European–OURS–and not Hebrew or Jewish. Pagan Hellas and Pagan Rome made EuroCiv great, and, after a Dark and Middle Age tyrannized by the Church, what brought it back to greatness was the Renaissance–a rebirth of the perspectives of Classical Hellas and Rome. That, of course, is what you reference in saying “It was only when Europeans began moving away from Christianity and towards science that they got back on their own two feet”–a startlingly accurate and incisive way of putting it!

    But, unfortunately, the Europeans simply became hypocrites. They didn’t burn the Judaic scriptures (OT & NT), ban the professional liars known as “clergymen,” or demolish the churches. They just gave lip-service to the Sklavenmoral-preaching son of the Judaic god while they served Mars, Mammon and Prometheus. They got their Global Hegemony and several multicontinental empires, but thoughtlessly preserved for us the Sklavenmoral. Hence pronouncements like the following infest the minds of both male and female Whites today–and not only as they are, literally, but as secularized elements of a liberal morality wherein “unselfishness” is the cornerstone:

    *”Blessed are the meek….
    *”Blessed are the merciful….
    *”No one should seek their own good, but the good of others….
    *”Do nothing out of selfish ambition…. Rather, in humility value others above yourselves….
    *”But for those who are self-seeking….there will be wrath and anger….
    *”It is more blessed to give than to receive….
    *”Whoever wants to be my disciple must deny themselves….
    *”Give to the one who asks you….
    *”Love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you….
    *”Put down your sword, for those who live by the sword shall die by the sword….
    *”resist not evil but whosoever smites you on the right cheek, turn to him the other cheek also.”

    No mystery why, of all the regions of the Earth, the places where this slave morality has longest endured are those in which people feel moral–they feel virtuous!–in inviting strangers to walk on them, to come into their ancestral lands and to demand and accuse and commit violence and, as things are going, eventually take those ancestral lands for themselves, without having to fire a shot!

    No mystery that in both continents where I’m a citizen, North America and Europe, Judeo-Christian NGOs are at the forefront of expediting the Third-World invasion of historically White lands. They assist the invaders in almost every way conceivable, and thus promote the invasion by encouraging Third-Worlders to come and be pampered, rewarded!

    The article’s author will say that they, the enablers, aren’t true Christians; but it’s evident that THEY, not he, are more in harmony with doctrinal Judeo-Christianity. They are surely closer to being truly “Christian” than he, who’d have us embrace a nominal, hypocritical Judeo-Christianity–such as flourished in the Renaissance and Age of Exploration and Colonization.

    But what’s the value of a religion to which we must be untrue to be strong and great?! Hypocrisy is, indeed, an antidote to the poison of Judeo-Christianity–a virtue where it’s concerned! But better to be whole and self-consistent in faithfully abiding by a salutary creed, such as either of the “White-racialist” religions of Pierce’s Cosmotheism and Klassen’s Creativity.

    • Agree: Sarah
  498. @Reg Cæsar

    We know a couple in which the wife suffers from an allergy to proteins in seminal fluid. They had to go to a doctor, who sent the husband’s fluid out to be cleansed of them.

    Now, see what my mere words typed on a comment thread produced? You recalling and describing a situation I’d never heard of before. So, we’ve all learned something new because of that. That’s the point of free speech. I will always push back at those who want to censor.

    Btw, there are many other allergy-type reactions women have to that fluid. It is likely the primary trigger for yeast infections (an ongoing issue for women), to name one.

    You rarely hear these complaints from Italian women, let alone Saudi.

    You live in America as I recall. So, how would you know what Italian or Saudi women have to say about any topic, let alone, their general views of men? Sources to support the claim?

    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar
  499. Anonymous[232] • Disclaimer says:
    @American Citizen

    Good point

  500. @The Real World

    So, how would you know what Italian or Saudi women have to say about any topic, let alone, their general views of men?

    Had Saudi women complaints about anything other than their lack of driver’s licenses, we’d have heard been told about it. Endlessly. On some things, you can trust the press!

    Italy’s women are more satisfied with their treatment than are American. Almost every country’s are. Slavs even more so than Mediterraneans:

    Pew: Widespread belief that gender equality is important

    The poll concerned equality of rights, with no mention of responsibilities. Thus the high scores everywhere. Bringing up the latter is what killed the ERA in America. Among women.

    • Replies: @The Real World
  501. @American Citizen

    Women had no role EVER in the public life of Rome.

    I’ve studied onomastics for over 40 years. As far as I know, the Romans were the only major race to feminize boys’ names for use with girls. E.g., Patricia, Claudia, Emilia. Others had separate lists for each sex, although occasionally a noun or adjective taken literally might be used for either sex, with the proper suffix. Eventually, Roman influence showed up in Greek names (e.g., Georgia, Eugenia), Germanic (Erika, Alberta), Hebrew (Joan, Jane), Celtic (Brianna), Slavic (Bogdana), and who knows what else.

    Since 1920 (19th Amendment) ask yourself: Is America better or worse, and which way is it heading?

    Women are more careful and conservative voters than men for about three generations after being given the franchise. Men built the Nanny State without their help. Ask any he-man Labourite in the UK or Oz. (Excuse me, it’s Laborite in Oz…)

    For the sake of stability, women’s suffrage might best be turned on and off every fifty years!

  502. Kali says:
    @Commentator Mike

    Thanks Mike. It’s kind of you to say so. I’m blessed also to be surounded by like minded people. This part of Portugal seems to be a bit of a Meca for off-griders of all kinds of backgrounds from all over Europe. Even one or two from your side of the pond too. Plus lots of israeli’s – but that’s true of everywhere these days.

    I’m as astonished as you are at the level of complacency that so many normies are steeped in. – My hubby often imagines tptsb wondering how far they have to go to wake people up. But I guess that those in control of public education and entertainment have done a very thorough job of dumbing down and pacifying the masses.

    Anyway, if you ever find yourself in Portugal, seeking an alternative way of living, do feel free to make contact. – We’re stronger together!

    Much love,
    Kali.

    • Thanks: Commentator Mike
  503. Kali says:
    @The Real World

    You argue in bad faith, “real world”, you project all kinds of nonsence onto others, and you don’t even bother to read their responces to your insane ideas.

    Now you project your desire for “censorship”.

    I don’t want to censor your ideas, RW, I just want to point out how mind-bogglingly insane they are. – I know that the are because I actually took the time to read them.

    Now unless you actually want to engage with the thoughts and observations I have put forward regarding the topic at hand, in responce to questions you have raised, I have nothing further to say to you. -Frankly I’m a busy woman and don’t have the time to waist on ignorant, opinionated, bad-faith interlocutors.

    Have a nice crusade,
    Kali.

    • Replies: @The Real World
  504. @Reg Cæsar

    Actually, after posting the prior comment, I chuckled and thought, “Did he REALLY say (and believe) that if Saudi women had substantial issues with males, or most anything, that we Westerners would know about it?” Think about how funny that is…and dialed-out, frankly. They are a massively closed society.

    We in the West know incredibly little about even their lives, let alone their viewpoints. Saudi women don’t talk to Western media. So, no, Reg…the press hasn’t much of a clue about it nor do we. I’m sure you would be surprised about the real views of Saudi women but, you shouldn’t be.

    Nice link but, I have no idea how you draw your conclusion! The first chart evidences that 78% of Italians (both sexes) of the 95% responding say that it is very important that women have the same rights as men. The difference in the numbers vs USA could very well have more to do with how the men responded to that with old world Italian men perhaps dragging down their number totals.

    The bottom chart declares 81% of Italian women view gender equality as very important.

    You’re stretching mightily trying to find something to fit a view you prefer.

    Short tie-in story: About a dozen years ago, I was traveling internationally for an extended period. As I always enjoy doing, in various countries I picked-up the English language or ex-pat newspaper or magazine to read about local/regional news.

    I chuckled about how in Vietnam, again in Australia and also in the Czech Repub, I came across articles about the struggles women were having with husbands doing their share in family/home life, with helping or spending time with her, how they disagree about money spending, etc. LOL, it was all the same stuff around the globe. That shouldn’t be surprising either.

    • Replies: @Kali
    , @Kali
    , @Reg Cæsar
  505. Kali says:
    @Reg Cæsar

    That would require artificial insemination to keep the race going.* How happy are the majority of prospective mothers going to be with that? As Linus Pauling said when invited to contribute to the “Nobel sperm bank”, the old way is best.

    Exactly, Reg. And thank you for pointing out the negative consequences of such barberism for women.

    you’re clearly not in the States, where ideological feminism is deep and ubiquitous. Suggesting that we are indeed the worst men in the world.

    Oh, I don’t know, Reg, maybe it says more about the quality of the women over there than it does the men? 😉

    Much love dear Reg,
    Kali.

    [Dear “real world” – Just putting the above out there as an “idea”. Maybe it has merrit, maybe it is stark, stirring insane? Having given it almost no thought what-so-ever, I can’t really say. – But I may troll you mersilessly if you regard it negatively. I may even acuse you of wanting to censor me if you reject entirely. But hey, it’s only “words”, and as we all know, words are puney, powerless and weakeand never caused an iota of harm, ever! – What is it they say; – The sword is mightier than the pen..? Or something. /sarcasm ends.]

  506. Kali says:
    @The Real World

    Reg said:

    where ideological feminism is deep and ubiquitous. Suggesting that we are indeed the worst men in the world. You rarely hear these complaints from Italian women, let alone Saudi.

    [my emphasis]

    Now you want him to prove that Italian or Saudi women don’t think their men are the worst in the world!

    And you want to argue that somehow he’s wrong because Italian women value equal rights.

    Such unadulterated pilpul should never go unmentioned!

    Kali.

  507. Kali says:
    @The Real World

    LOL, it was all the same stuff around the globe. That shouldn’t be surprising either.

    Certainly not surprising to anyone who knows anything about media ownership on the planet, and how it’s used for shaping narratives.

    Nao e?

    Kali.

    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar
  508. @The Real World

    …in various countries I picked-up the English language or ex-pat newspaper or magazine to read about local/regional news.

    I preferred the vernacular media or, better yet, talking with the locals.

    …it was all the same stuff around the globe. That shouldn’t be surprising either.

    Why would it? It was all in the same language!

    • Replies: @The Real World
  509. @Kali

    Não é?

    Pois é!

    • Replies: @Kali
  510. @Reg Cæsar

    Reg – The decent thing to do would be to say, “You make good points. We in the West know little about Saudi life and certainly almost nothing about how Saudi women feel about their lives. Also, my grasp of the charts I fronted about the Italians was not solid and didn’t indicate what I thought they did.”

    That’s it, not hard to do.

    Why would it? It was all in the same language!

    That makes no sense. They were all local publications in entirely different countries on different continents – not globally owned. They are for the ex-pat community and are printed in English because it’s the international default language so ex-pats from most countries can read them.

    Bottom line = Same or similar human difficulties exist in most geographies.

    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar
  511. anon[363] • Disclaimer says:
    @anon

    “Michelle” Obama? You mean Michael Robinson?

  512. Nancy says:
    @Jeff M. Smith

    As an avid gardener, I can attest that, yes, the living soil does make plants. Everything makes everything in the natural cycle of life and apparent death… there is no waste (And I did say I was speaking ‘half facetiously’ : )

    • Replies: @Jeff M. Smith
  513. @Kali

    Dear Lord – As I lay me down to sleep, let me pray that our unhinged, wannabe authoritarian living in Portugal, with reading comprehension deficits and an unwillingness to face reality does, at least, evidence to be a woman of her word with this:

    “I have nothing further to say to you.”

    Ahh, alas, she is not a women of her word. More irrational rantings have followed here. Sigh — the bright lights of reality are very difficult for some but, I believe she’ll get there in time if she possesses humility, sincerity and an open mind.

    Good night…

    • Replies: @Kali
  514. @The Real World

    We in the West know little about Saudi life and certainly almost nothing about how Saudi women feel about their lives.

    But we know plenty about how American women feel about their lives, and their men. It would be surprising if the situation in Arabia, or anywhere else, were as bad as it is here. America is to masculinity what Haiti is to public health.

    • Replies: @The Real World
  515. Tsigantes says:

    Feminism has always been for the elites, elite women.
    The early British Suffragettes – whose movement took off just after WW1 – were all upper class women demanding votes for themselves, but NOT for the working class men who had been fighting the war. Working class people – men and women – were not to be given the franchise.

  516. Kali says:
    @The Real World

    Ah, but I was not speaking “to you”, little miss social construct, I was speaking AT you. Others, those who appreciate rhetoric, may appreciate the difference.

    If you would now like to elaborate the difference between “speaking” and “writing”, be my guest.

    Kali.

    • Replies: @The Real World
  517. @Kali

    A genuine hair-splitter and goal post mover, you are. People love those like they love mosquitoes.

    No, I am morally compelled to assist you on your crusade of raging about and wanting to suppress words and ideas that frighten you.

    ALERT! ALERT! (you’re going to want to sit down for this one)

    Wowser, a commenter on here likes the idea of clipping a guys nuts if he commits gun crime. Ouch! Seems kinda radical to me but, you have to admit, it would probably be an excellent deterrent to violent crime. Wait, it has the added bonus of achieving many of the features I mentioned as well. No unwanted pregnancies from them, fewer abortions, fewer kids in foster care, etc. etc.

    Hey, if this idea keeps getting noodled (no pun intended), we might be able to refine it to something truly doable. See what free speech does – it’s glorious!

    Now, please go give Bo Bo a proper, authoritarian beat-down. Go get him/her/it, tiger lady!
    https://www.unz.com/aanglin/blake-masters-on-the-root-of-americas-gun-violence-problem-black-people-frankly/ Comment #146

    • Replies: @Kali
  518. @Reg Cæsar

    So, you’re not big enough to own the prior mistaken and grasping assertions, I see. That is disappointing as I thought you might be able to stand taller than many others on here.

    LOL, and still trying to salvage the weak assertions by posting a goofy pic. Just stop, Reg, you’re embarrassing yourself at this point… twisting into a pretzel.

    But, let’s get something constructive out of it, shall we? Methinks different commenters on here are likely employing a half dozen varying definitions or understandings of “feminism”, which doesn’t make for coherent discussion at all. How do you define that word or theme when you are commenting regarding that subject?

    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar
  519. @The Real World

    So, you’re not big enough to own the prior mistaken and grasping assertions…

    No, I readily admitted not knowing the gritty details of Saudi life. But as I feel safe to assume that public health in the KSA is at a higher level than that of Haiti, so I assume that relations between the sexes are better there, or in any country chosen at random, than here in the US. It’s a safe bet to make.

    Methinks different commenters on here are likely employing a half dozen varying definitions or understandings of “feminism”

    As with “socialism”, definitions, whether internal or external to the movement, are all over the map. It’s just an umbrella term for advocacy that puts women’s interests above any other.

    I may disagree– strongly– with Norwegian feminists. But they are due some respect for leading the effort to apply their country’s (active) conscription laws to their own sex. Admirable consistency there. In the US, there has been no counterpart. In practice, everyone on both sides of the aisle seems to agree that men have a duty that women do not. It is no accident that our Equal Rights Amendment, 99 years old in 2022, makes no mention of obligation or responsibilities.

    On sex, America is the odd (wo)man out. Which is why we are subject to the world’s mockery.

  520. It’s just an umbrella term for advocacy that puts women’s interests above any other.

    Wow, you seem more objective than many on here so, color me surprised by that reply.

    In decades, I have never heard anyone (even diehard feminists) provide that description or intent.