The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 Andrew Joyce Archive
The Jewish Origins of American Legal Pluralism
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

“Cohen realised that it was not enough to describe the state as being made up of many political groups. Such a statement did not justify opening American borders to strangers or protecting strangers’ interests. Only a normative argument about the importance of diversity in individual and social life could give the outsider a place in American society.”
Dalia Mitchell, Architect of Justice: Felix S. Cohen and the Founding of American Legal Pluralism[1]D. Mitchell, Architect of Justice: Felix S. Cohen and the Founding of American Legal Pluralism (Itchaca: Cornell University Press, 2007), 5.

“Cohen’s life work revolved around what currently travels under the trendy buzzword diversity.”
Steve Russell, “Felix Cohen, Anti-Semitism, and American Indian Law.”[2]S. Russell, “Review Essay: Architect of Justice: Felix S. Cohen and the Founding of American Legal Pluralism,” Wacazo Sa Review, 23:2 (Fall 2008), 112-114 (113).

Introduction

Contrary to Nathan Cofnas’s claim that modern multiculturalism can be attributed to the idea that “the West was on a liberal trajectory with or without Jews,” Jews have demonstrably been critical in the majority of significant legal developments in the advance of multiculturalism and cultural pluralism, both in Europe and in the United States. Brenton Sanderson has made an exceptionally strong case for the same to be said in relation to Australia. Absent detail of any kind, explaining the current ideological climate on race and immigration as the result of any kind of “trajectory” is really nothing more than a just-so story. It’s an untestable narrative explanation: “Things are the way they are, because that’s the way things were going.” To mention nothing from any period earlier than the twentieth century, this “liberal trajectory” has certainly been a highly anomalous one, featuring among other anti-liberal trends, the advent of radical conservatism, the rise of Fascism, the development of notions of a racial state, and the introduction of racially exclusionary immigration laws. That these laws were quite radically overturned in the United States, and in a very short span of time (1924–1965), would seem to represent a dramatic break from trajectory, rather than a natural flowing from one. What prompted this turn? Laws promoting multicultural understandings of citizenship were introduced from the 1960s, in the United States and elsewhere, which led to the gradual displacement of Whites in their own lands. One can prevaricate on how these destructive laws can be traced to the ideas of Rousseau, or any other Enlightenment philosophe, but it pays a greater scholarly dividend to focus instead on who exactly introduced these laws and what their immediate motivations may have been. These facts can be tested, often with reference to the unambiguous statements and explanations of the actors themselves. And these actors are often Jews.

One of the preoccupations in my writing for this website has been to issue warnings about changes in the law, particularly in relation to speech and censorship. I warned of the imminence of internet censorship, and the gross expansion of hate laws and the concept of terrorism, years before these things came finally to fruition. While I agree with most people that law is often downstream from culture, I find it undeniable that sometimes the two operate simultaneously and in tandem, with law driving and reinforcing cultural change, and sometimes preceding it entirely. Thus, whoever holds legal power influences culture, just as much as they who influence culture can manipulate the law. The group that holds both centers of power is powerful indeed.

The historical relationship of Jews with the legal apparatus of European and Western nations deserves close and special attention. There have been many successive legal as well as philosophical changes across the West over a number of centuries which have cumulatively resulted in the widening of the concept of citizenship, the end point of which has been the dominance of pluralistic understandings of citizenship in the bureaucratic state and the eventual permission of mass migration. The historical record is clear that in terms of these legal changes, Jews have been the dominant cause or instigators of modifications designed to introduce “tolerance” into the law, from the medieval charters establishing the tolerance of Jewish trading settlements in European cities[3]J. Ray, “The Jew in the Text: What Christian Charters Tell Us About Medieval Jewish Society,” Medieval Encounters 16, 2-4 (2010): 243-267. to Moshe Kantor’s contemporary “Secure Tolerance” project. This is to say nothing of overwhelming Jewish influence in the design and implementation of “hate laws” (see here and here) designed to uphold and strengthen the multicultural state.

Kevin MacDonald has explored Jewish activism in the period of White ethnic defense from around 1890 through the 1924 and 1952 immigration laws, and the intense Jewish opposition to those laws. The role of Jewish activism was critical in enacting the 1965 law which revolutionized American immigration legislation and permanently changed America’s demographic destiny. In the following essay I want to build upon MacDonald’s specific illustration of Jewish legal influence in the expansion of pluralistic concepts of citizenship and culture in America by using the example of the Jewish philosopher and lawyer Felix Solomon Cohen (1907–1953). The career of Cohen offers something of a prequel to the 1965 activism, with Cohen emerging as a subtle but important forerunner of many of the ideas and approaches used to create present-day multicultural America.

Networks and Nepotism

For most readers, Felix Cohen will be an unfamiliar personality. This is hardly surprising when even the scholar behind his most substantial biography argues that “for the most part his work was behind the scenes.”[4]Mitchell, 7. And yet Cohen was as stubbornly influential as he was elusive, with the same author stressing that his activism “had a profound influence on the transformation of law in the first half of the twentieth century,”[5]Ibid, 1.
(Mitchell, 7.)
and that his story “is the story of the origins of multiculturalism.”[6]Ibid, 3.
(Mitchell, 7.)
Cohen was born in Manhattan in 1907 and grew up in Yonkers. His father, Morris Raphael Cohen, was a philosopher at the City College of New York and a member of the New School for Social Research. Morris Cohen was extremely keen to promote “a new ideal, a cosmopolitan Jewish identity,”[7]Ibid, 16.
(Mitchell, 7.)
and with it to expand Jewish involvement in American life.

Felix Cohen absorbed many of his father’s ideas, as well as grievances. Morris often complained that he had found it difficult to get a job teaching philosophy because of anti-Semitism[8]Ibid, 15.
(Mitchell, 7.)
, an explanation for personal failure that Felix would also eventually employ. Felix Cohen possessed a keen intelligence. He attended the City College of New York, where he rose in 1925 to become editor of The Campus. His early activism provoked such a storm of complaint, including one reader’s letter suggesting that “ungrateful kikes should get the hell out of here and go back to Trotsky’s paradise,” that he was dismissed by the magazine’s board. He left CCNY and later received an M.A. and Ph.D. in philosophy from Harvard University in 1927 and 1929, respectively. Cohen then entered Columbia Law School in 1928 and graduated in 1931. From his earliest days studying law, Cohen was destined to become a dedicated ethnic activist. Biographer Dalia Mitchell points out that Cohen’s generation of young Jewish lawyers “viewed the study of law as providing tool with which they could challenge the authority of the Anglo-Saxon elite in American life.”[9]Ibid, 32.
(Mitchell, 7.)
For Cohen, this involved the “personal hope that American law could remedy wrongs against Jews, specifically forced exclusion.”[10]Ibid, 7.
(Mitchell, 7.)
The primary weapon in this fight would be the promotion of pluralism within American law, both by expanding the concept of citizenship and weakening America’s borders.

Although beginning his career with a short stint at an average law firm, Cohen’s big break came thanks to FDR’s momentous decision to nominate Felix Frankfurter to the Supreme Court. Previously reluctant to hire Jews, the legal establishment in Washington was thereafter inundated thanks to a wave of ethnic nepotism ushered in by Frankfurter. Cohen biographer Alice Kehoe remarks that “Frankfurter unabashedly recommended young Jewish lawyers for federal positions to the point that newspapers wrote of the unprecedented number of Jews hired and of fears that a “Jewish cabal” was taking over America.”[11]A. B. Kehoe, A Passion for the True and Just: Felix and Lucy Kramer Cohen and the Indian New Deal (Tuscon: University of Arizona Press, 2014), 46. Frankfurter was a close personal friend of Morris Cohen (the pair were also close friends with Horace Kallen), and when Frankfurter hired the family’s neighbour Nathan Margold to oversee the legal team at Department of the Interior, it was a foregone conclusion that Margold would in turn hire Felix Cohen to join the team. Like the Cohens, Nathan Margold, whose son would later become one of the first major porn barons in America, was an early activist for multiculturalism and author of the 1933 “Margold Report” which called for increased “civil rights” for Blacks.

Legal and Ethnic Warfare

Together at the Interior, Margold and Cohen initially decided to promote pluralism by focusing on the position of Indians/Native Americans in American law. The approach was thought particularly suitable because Cohen’s wife, Lucy Kramer, was an anthropologist working alongside Franz Boas (also a friend of Morris Cohen) at Columbia, where she focussed on promoting culturally relativistic understandings of Native American life. At one point, for example, Kramer wrote a manuscript titled Red Man’s Gifts to Modern America, which was so overblown and unrealistic that it was rejected by her editor with the comment: “Sounds too much as though ballyhooing. Something which she wants to believe.”[12]Kehoe, 86-7.

Margold’s intention was to bring Cohen, whose ideology was shaped by his Jewish origins and “Franz Boas’s teaching of historical particularism and cultural relativism,”[13]Ibid, 5.
(Kehoe, 86-7.)
into a leading position in Indian Affairs within the Interior, but the initial move to get Cohen appointed Associate Solicitor for Indian Affairs was complicated. Margold’s boss and Secretary of the Interior was the Anglo-Saxon Harold Ickes, who recorded in his private diary “I had decided not to appoint a Jew if I could avoid it.”[14]K. K. Washburn, “Felix Cohen, anti-Semitism, and American Indian Law,” American Indian Law Review, 33:2, 583-605 (603). Ickes initially refused to hire Cohen, but made the mistake of explaining his reasons (suspicion of Jews) to someone else in the department. Legal historian Kevin Washburn comments “Ickes claims he was blackmailed into [hiring Cohen] when word got out that [anti-Semitism] was his reason.”[15]Ibid.
(K. K. Washburn, “Felix Cohen, anti-Semitism, and American Indian Law,” American Indian Law Review, 33:2, 583-605 (603).)
Cohen was thus appointed Associate Solicitor for Indian Affairs, and was set to work by Margold on a project that would transform the position of Indians/Native Americans in American law. One scholar has commented that, “though Cohen was still a young lawyer, he had highly sophisticated views of the law’s purpose and was working toward the development of a broader philosophy of cultural and legal pluralism. Indeed, his dissertation had addressed this theme, albeit in a broad theoretical manner.”[16]Ibid, 586.
(K. K. Washburn, “Felix Cohen, anti-Semitism, and American Indian Law,” American Indian Law Review, 33:2, 583-605 (603).)
In one of the most prominent of Cohen’s legal changes in his new role, Indians/Native Americans automatically became United States citizens, whereas previously they could only become citizens via treaty.[17]N. Pickus, Immigration and Citizenship in the 21st Century (New York: Rowman & Littlefield, 1998), 55.

It’s interesting that Cohen’s Jewish biographers have been at pains to present Cohen as involving himself in the promotion of “Indian rights” for purely altruistic ends, whereas non-Jewish authors have been much more forthcoming in seeing Cohen as engaging in a kind of proxy legal war against White America and its racially exclusive approach to citizenship and immigration. University of Iowa’s Kevin Washburn has been particularly scathing of Jewish scholar Dalia Tsuk Mitchell’s glowing panegyric to Cohen, Architect of Justice: Felix S. Cohen and the Founding of American Legal Pluralism, and has asked:

Was Cohen’s interest in Indian law and Indian people purely platonic, intellectual, and ideological, as Mitchell implicitly suggests, or was it driven in part or wholly by a sense of shared experience with other oppressed peoples? … Did Cohen’s Jewish identity — and his feelings of being an outsider to the then-ruling elite in the United States — affect his views about Indian tribes?[18]Washburn, 600 & 603.

Washburn is skeptical about Cohen’s selfless altruism to say the least. He points out that Cohen once wrote “The Indian plays much the same role in our American society that the Jews played in Germany.”[19]Ibid, 604.
(Washburn, 600 & 603.)
And while Cohen was, in Mitchell’s phrasing merely “impatient” with Anglo-Saxon America’s “particularism,” he was strident in his insistence that Jews should be able to continue their separate existence within the ‘Melting Pot,” viewing Jewish assimilation as “cultural death,”[20]Ibid, 587.
(Washburn, 600 & 603.)
and telling one colleague that he would “punch … in the nose” anyone who suggested Jews “ought to be beneficially assimilated into the Anglo-Saxon Protestant mainstream of American life.”[21]Ibid, 604.
(Washburn, 600 & 603.)
In Washburn’s view, there was a clear ethnic struggle, and Mitchell’s biography “fails to cast light on the darker aspects of Cohen’s personal experiences as a Jewish-American civil servant in mid-twentieth century America.”[22]Ibid.
(Washburn, 600 & 603.)

Immigration and Open Borders

The activities of Cohen, Margold, and other Jews within the Department of the Interior, both in relation to the expansion of Indian “rights,” and issues of immigration and citizenship more generally, eventually escalated to the stage where they prompted a reaction from the Anglo-Saxon establishment. In early 1939 Cohen began agitating for immigration reform within Interior, eventually latching onto the idea of “developing Alaska” by settling large numbers of European Jews in the state (the Alaska Development Bill—Kehoe states that the entire bill was written by Cohen[23]Kehoe, 5.). In his Harvard-published FDR and the Jews (2013), Richard Breitman writes that in 1939 “Interior Department official Felix Cohen presented a report indicating that industrious immigrants would boost the Alaskan economy and an expanded population would bolster the nation’s defense.”[24]R. Breitman, FDR and the Jews (Harvard: Harvard University Press, 2013), 159. In a move of crypsis eerily prefiguring attempts to use John F. Kennedy as the face of propaganda intended to pave the way for the 1965 immigration act, Margold and Cohen chose a non-Jewish department figure to act as figurehead for the bill. Breitman writes:

Undersecretary of the Interior Henry Slattery became its official sponsor, rather than Nathan Margold or Cohen, its senior proponents in Interior: for domestic consumption, the “Slattery Plan” sounded better politically than the “Cohen Plan.”[25]Ibid.
(R. Breitman, FDR and the Jews (Harvard: Harvard University Press, 2013), 159.)

While working on the bill, Cohen also published a lengthy article in the National Lawyer’s Guild Quarterly that essentially made the case for opening America’s borders to immigrants of all backgrounds. Titled “Exclusionary Immigration Laws: Their Social and Economic Consequences,” the essay was a full-frontal attack on Anglo-Saxon nativism. The article, which I have read in full, opens with a list of America’s exclusionary immigration laws, beginning with the 1882 act targeting Chinese migrants. Cohen remarks:

Each of the foregoing statutes was based in part on economic or materialistic grounds, and in part upon theories of racial or cultural superiority. … Tolerance develops as a way of life when people realize that strange faces, strange accents, and strange ideas do not necessarily portend disaster. … The greatest danger to American institutions comes from those who could cut off the living stream [immigration] that has been the source of our national life. … The effect of such a cutting off of immigration as is proposed by various bills now pending in Congress would be to make the entire country more and more like those regions which have been untouched by immigration in the past century. Our standard of living would be lower, our illiteracy rates higher, our prejudice against minority races, minority creeds, and foreigners generally would be more intense. … The human rights of the citizen are safe only when the rights of the foreigner are protected.[26]Quotes taken from the reprint of the 1939 article which appeared in the Contemporary Jewish Record, 3:2, (March 1 1940), 141.

Cohen’s article was later published as a pamphlet by the American Jewish Committee, and was essentially the “skeleton” text upon which most of the propaganda for the 1965 Act was based, including “John F. Kennedy’s” (really, an ADL/AJC project) Nation of Immigrants. Cohen was also behind the AJC’s most prominent pro-immigration material. In his Princeton-published Jews and Liberalism, for example, Marc Dollinger points out that the American Jewish Committee’s March 1949 landmark statement on “Americanizing our Immigration Laws” had been written in full by Cohen.[27]M. Dollinger, Jews and Liberalism (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000), 268.

Despite the obvious self-interest of Jews like Cohen and Margold in advocating for such radical changes in American law, the pair maintained the charade even under intense questioning in Congress. David Wyman, in Paper Walls: America and the Refugee Crisis, 1938–1941, writes that during the hearings “witnesses for the bill repeatedly maintained its major objective was development of Alaska and that its refugee features were only incidental.”[28]D. Wyman, Paper Walls: America and the Refugee Crisis, 1938-1941 (Plunkett Lake Press, 2019). The two primary objectors to the bill were Robert R. Reynolds (Dem.) of North Carolina and Homer T. Bone (Dem.) of Washington. The pair questioned the given rationale behind the bill and “pressed these witnesses to agree that the legislation was really aimed mainly at helping [Jewish] refugees.” Reynolds was notable for denouncing the bill as “just a smoke screen” for Jews “to get in the back door.”

Cohen was, however, reluctant to give ground and maintained the charade, with Wyman reporting that Cohen “denied that the primary aim of the measure was to help refugees and stated that the immigration features were simply an essential means for carrying out the fundamental purpose of the bill, settlement of Alaska.” He fooled no-one, and the bill was crushed.

The activities of Cohen, Margold, and other Jews within Interior had by the 1940s raised considerable consternation among the Anglo-Saxon establishment. Both Cohen and Margold had developed an “Indian New Deal” that “emphasized the state’s obligation to protect the rights of minority groups” and “advocated constitutional protection for group rights.”[29]Mitchell, 5. The response was rapid, taking Cohen and his clique entirely by surprise. In early 1940, Cohen was removed from the Indian project in front of his own staff by Assistant Attorney General Norman Littell, who explained that Cohen’s ongoing work on Indian affairs was found to have been of “inferior quality.”[30]Washburn, 601. A few months later, Cohen, now more or less aimless within the department, wrote to a friend that he had in fact fallen victim to an anti-Semitic “purge,” pointing out that all other individuals who had been fired alongside him were also Jewish (Abraham Glasser, Bernard Levinson, Theodore Spector, and Jacob Wasserman).[31]Ibid, 599 & 601.
(Washburn, 601.)
Cohen wrote that the firing was designed “to humiliate me personally before my staff and later to attack my scholarship and my character.”[32]Ibid, 601.
(Washburn, 601.)
Kevin Washburn suggests that Cohen may not have been wrong in assuming that he was targeted as a Jew, but adds that Cohen’s own activism played a role. In Washburn’s words, “Cohen may have been too pro-Indian” and as a cosmopolitan Jew attempting to chip away at Anglo-Saxon “particularism.” “Cohen was simply ill-matched to the task” of being a cooperative cog in the Interior’s machine.[33]Ibid.
(Washburn, 601.)
Most interesting of all is the fact that Littell had earlier expressed the opinion that anti-Semitism had some basis in genuine conflicts of interest, and had once highlighted Jews as stronger economic competitors than Anglo-Saxons.[34]Ibid, 602.
(Washburn, 601.)
In other words, the purge may well have been the retribution of WASPs suddenly aware of what Frankfurter’s “Jewish cabal” was doing. In 1948, the increasingly sidelined Cohen left the department and never returned to government.

All of Cohen’s subsequent work is described by Mitchell as involving attempts “to make the American legal system more inclusive,” and until his death he retained “a personal sense of failure at his inability to build a pluralist [multicultural] state.”[35]Mitchell, 5 & 6. Despite his individual failure, however, Mitchell insists that Cohen was extremely influential, and that his legacy was taken up by later activists. In Mitchell’s words, “even failed attempts to devise formalistic legal structures to accomplish pluralistic goals create peripheries where pluralism might flourish.”[36]Ibid, 8.
(Mitchell, 5 & 6.)
In Cohen’s case, these peripheries were his introduction of Indian legislation and citizenship clauses that undermined the increasingly strong notion of the United States as a state designed to fulfil the destiny of Whites in a new continent. In this sense, Cohen’s activism and “peripheries” reached fulfilment in the 1965 Immigration Act, and in the multicultural America we see today.

Conclusion

Many of the events and tactics from Cohen’s career clearly anticipate later Jewish activism around the 1965 Immigration Act, as well as contemporary Jewish activism promoting immigration and multiculturalism. Of particular interest is the fact Jews like Cohen and Margold appear to have obtained their positions primarily through nepotism, and even blackmail, rather than merit. Interestingly, the possibility that threatening to expose one as an “anti-Semite” for not hiring a Jew could result in severe repercussions even during the 1930s shows that Jews had already made substantial progress in their ascent to elite status. MacDonald discusses this shift in his review of Joseph Bendersky’s The Jewish Threat: ‘Anti-Semitic Politics of the U.S. Army:

It is remarkable that people like Lothrop Stoddard and Charles Lindbergh wrote numerous articles for the popular media, including Collier’s, the Saturday Evening Post and Reader’s Digest between World War I and World War II (p. 23). In 1920–1921, the Saturday Evening Post ran a series of 19 articles on Eastern European immigration emphasizing Jewish unassimilability and the Jewish association with Bolshevism. At the time, the Post was the most widely read magazine in the U.S., with a weekly readership of 2,000,000.

The tide against the world view of the officers turned with the election of Roosevelt. ” Jews served prominently in his administration,” (p. 244) including Felix Frankfurter who had long been under scrutiny by MID [Military Intelligence Division] as a “dangerous Jewish radical” (p. 244). Jews had also won the intellectual debate: “Nazi racial ideology was under attack in the press as pseudo‑science and fanatical bigotry.” (p. 244) Jews also had a powerful position in the media, including ownership of several large, influential newspapers (New York Times, New York Post, Washington Post, Philadelphia Inquirer, Philadelphia Record and Pittsburgh Post‑Gazette), radio networks (CBS, the dominant radio network, and NBC, headed by David Sarnoff), and all of the major Hollywood movie studios (see MacDonald 1998/2001).

It is remarkable that the word ‘Nordic’ disappeared by the 1930s although the restrictionists still had racialist views of Jews and themselves (p. 245). By 1938 eugenics was “shunned in public discourse of the day.” (p. 250) Whereas such ideas were commonplace in the mainstream media in the 1920s, General George van Horn Moseley’s 1938 talk on eugenics and its implications for immigration policy caused a furor when it was reported in the newspapers. Moseley was charged with anti‑Semitism although he denied referring to Jews in his talk. The incident blew over, but “henceforth, the military determined to protect itself against charges of anti‑Semitism that might sully its reputation or cause it political problems. … The army projected itself as an institution that would tolerate neither racism nor anti-Semitism” (p. 252‑253).

Moseley himself continued to attack the New Deal, saying it was manipulated by “the alien element in our midst” (p. 253) — obviously a coded reference to Jews. This time he was severely reprimanded and the press wouldn’t let it die. By early 1939, Moseley, who had retired from the army, became explicitly anti-Jewish, asserting that Jews wanted the U.S. to enter the proposed war in Europe and that the war would be waged for Jewish hegemony. He accused Jews of controlling the media and having a deep influence on the government. In 1939, he testified before the House Un-American Activities Committee on Jewish complicity in Communism and praised the Germans for dealing with the Jews properly (p. 256). But his testimony was beyond the pale by this time. As Bendersky notes, Moseley had only articulated the common Darwinian world view of the earlier generation, and he had asserted the common belief of an association of Jews with Communism. These views remained common in the army and elsewhere on the political right, but they were simply not stated publicly. And if they were, heads rolled and careers were ended.

The new climate can also be seen in the fact that Lothrop Stoddard stopped referring to Jews completely in his lectures to the Army War College in the late 1930s, but continued to advocate eugenics and was sympathetic to Nazism in the late 1930s because it took the race notion seriously. By 1940, the tables had turned. Anti-Jewish attitudes came to be seen as subversive by the government, and the FBI alerted military intelligence that Lothrop Stoddard should be investigated as a security risk in the event of war (p. 280).

Finally, it is also noteworthy that Cohen, Margold and their co-ethnics in government harbored a clear sense of ethnic grievance against Whites which was accompanied by entirely unconvincing denials of self-interest and flamboyant displays of superficial altruism in relation to other minority groups (Blacks for Margold; Indians for Cohen). Of primary importance to these activists was the need to boost the position of non-Whites within the American legal structure, either by manipulating what it meant to be a citizen (and what ‘rights’ and ‘obligations’ that entailed), or by expanding who could become a citizen. These legal manipulations and reversals, and their occurrence in the context of what amounts to a very clear and often explicit clash of ethnic interests between dedicated Jewish activist lawyers and the WASP establishment, raise serious questions about whether America was really on a “liberal trajectory” in which the current multicultural status quo was an inevitability.

Notes

[1] D. Mitchell, Architect of Justice: Felix S. Cohen and the Founding of American Legal Pluralism (Itchaca: Cornell University Press, 2007), 5.

[2] S. Russell, “Review Essay: Architect of Justice: Felix S. Cohen and the Founding of American Legal Pluralism,” Wacazo Sa Review, 23:2 (Fall 2008), 112-114 (113).

[3] J. Ray, “The Jew in the Text: What Christian Charters Tell Us About Medieval Jewish Society,” Medieval Encounters 16, 2-4 (2010): 243-267.

[4] Mitchell, 7.

[5] Ibid, 1.

[6] Ibid, 3.

[7] Ibid, 16.

[8] Ibid, 15.

[9] Ibid, 32.

[10] Ibid, 7.

[11] A. B. Kehoe, A Passion for the True and Just: Felix and Lucy Kramer Cohen and the Indian New Deal (Tuscon: University of Arizona Press, 2014), 46.

[12] Kehoe, 86-7.

[13] Ibid, 5.

[14] K. K. Washburn, “Felix Cohen, anti-Semitism, and American Indian Law,” American Indian Law Review, 33:2, 583-605 (603).

[15] Ibid.

[16] Ibid, 586.

[17] N. Pickus, Immigration and Citizenship in the 21st Century (New York: Rowman & Littlefield, 1998), 55.

[18] Washburn, 600 & 603.

[19] Ibid, 604.

[20] Ibid, 587.

[21] Ibid, 604.

[22] Ibid.

[23] Kehoe, 5.

[24] R. Breitman, FDR and the Jews (Harvard: Harvard University Press, 2013), 159.

[25] Ibid.

[26] Quotes taken from the reprint of the 1939 article which appeared in the Contemporary Jewish Record, 3:2, (March 1 1940), 141.

[27] M. Dollinger, Jews and Liberalism (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000), 268.

[28] D. Wyman, Paper Walls: America and the Refugee Crisis, 1938-1941 (Plunkett Lake Press, 2019).

[29] Mitchell, 5.

[30] Washburn, 601.

[31] Ibid, 599 & 601.

[32] Ibid, 601.

[33] Ibid.

[34] Ibid, 602.

[35] Mitchell, 5 & 6.

[36] Ibid, 8.

(Republished from The Occidental Observer by permission of author or representative)
 
Hide 104 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. Rational says:

    DEAR JUDAISTS—PLEASE, PLEASE, GO BACK TO ISRAEL AND IMPORT ALIENS THERE–INSTEAD OF BURNING DOWN OUR COUNTRY.

    Thanks, Sir. Excellent article, again, like usual.

    This Cohen thug was a liar when he said: … “The human rights of the citizen are safe only when the rights of the foreigner are protected.”

    Because, in Israel, they are stealing land from the foreigners (i.e. Palis) and give them no rights at all and have declared Israel a Jewish state (apartheid state, per B’Tselem).

    See: https://www.aljazeera.com/gallery/2020/7/8/in-pictures-israels-illegal-separation-wall-still-divides

    So I have a heartfelt request to all Jewish alienists who promote immigration to USA/EU: Please, please, stop drinking our blood and cutting our throats and dumping enema on US. Please, please, go to your beloved Israel and leave us alone. We are sick and tired of your daily lies, lies, lies, lies, lies, lies………and all forms of Jewspeak, your daily abuse (calling patriots Nazis, etc.) Please go away, Judaists!!!!! Even dogs have more morals and would have gone by now. Why can’t you people get it? So go away, please.

    • Agree: Monotonous Languor
  2. anonymous[164] • Disclaimer says:

    Re the ‘anti-liberal trend of fascism’ as Joyce mentions above –

    The founder of literal fascism, Benito Mussolini (1883-1945), turns out to have been quite shaped by his Jewish mistress of several decades, Margherita Sarfatti (1880-1961) née Grassini, whose heritage was that of the wealthy bankers of Venice

    She was key in his politically formative years, even ‘ghost writing’ for him in his lead-up to power, and often with him privately in the first decade of Mussolini’s rule … she quietly had a role in shaping the whole ‘fascist’ programme, as expressed in Mussolini’s 1932 ‘The Doctrine of Fascism’

    And not only did Mussolini’s muse Margherita, come from a prominent Venice Jewish banking family – Her wealthy Jewish father, Amadeo Grassini, was also close friend of the man who became anti-modernist pre-war (1903-14) Pope Pius X, icon of today’s traditionalist Roman Catholics fond of the older Latin church services, liturgy essentially forbidden under Pope Francis’ new dictat

    • Replies: @Dingo bay rum
  3. Chris Moore says: • Website

    Laws promoting multicultural understandings of citizenship were introduced from the 1960s, in the United States and elsewhere, which led to the gradual displacement of Whites in their own lands. One can prevaricate on how these destructive laws can be traced to the ideas of Rousseau, or any other Enlightenment philosophe, but it pays a greater scholarly dividend to focus instead on who exactly introduced these laws and what their immediate motivations may have been. These facts can be tested, often with reference to the unambiguous statements and explanations of the actors themselves. And these actors are often Jews.

    When did Jews, liberalism and multiculturalism become synonymous?

    This is part and parcel of the ((Jewish)) grift and grand illusion: act out the role of “liberal” while secretly pursing your own ethnic accounts and Zionist/Judeofascist geopolitical designs, and engaging in the worst kind of crypto racism against Whites (and all “goyim” who get in your way) to do so.

    The ((Jews)) are a massive fraud. But so are their accomplices, who are also actors in this epic charade and Big Lie, from Bush/Cheney neocons to Clinton/Obama liberals.

    It’s all driven by enriching the “multicultural” (Jew friendly) One Percent. The Judeofascists have been using their ethnic network’s control of the Federal Reserve to buy of corrupt confederates and accomplices for decades, including the scum who have enabled the endless Mideast wars for Israel, the MIC, oil and mineral wealth, the Petrodollar…

    Now that the sh*t is hitting the fan, the Judeofascists and their accomplices are creacking down on the restive population.

    These damn “hippies” (including neocon and “Christian” corporate jackasses) who let top ((Jews)) take control of the Conch in exchange for a cut of their ill-gotten gains are guilty of treason to a man (and a womyn).

    True “anti-Semitic” Christianity has been proven right once again: “Judas” betrays.

  4. long game says:

    The jews are nothing but congenital liars and thieves, rapists and predators. Study the history; follow the money. Also, this site is probably just a mirror site that allows “you know who” to gather information on those who don’t know their place and refuse to be good goy. Whites better start banding together or they WILL end up in camps. This is the jew long game.

    • Replies: @CauCasiAnn
    , @Oracle
  5. @Rational

    Disagree. Don’t send them to greater Palestine. If you want genocide, still, don’t do it that way.

    Throwing them out of the country can no longer work in the modern world of rapid travel.

    Disenfranchise them. Be clear that they are not citizens so can’t be employed by the gubment.

    And require them to all wear a large badge. Not with 6 points. An image of a pig snout.

    The difficulty is that the Jews have always been the aggressors and we, the Gentiles, have always been the victims. They are so powerful that we might not be able to do any to those things.

    Put them in ghettoes ruled by their rabbis. They’d love that. Give the rabbis the power of life or death over them, per Ezra. That was a success till we were blinded by the Enlightenment.

    Doing it that way might be our only hope.

  6. @long game

    That’ll never happen because they’re too busy infighting on social media.

    I also wonder if we’ll be confined to districts and starved like The Hunger Games. Those people took it for years without fighting back.

  7. Exile says:

    For generations, Whites in the historically White nations have wanted societies proper for raising families – socially sane and safe with economic security and a decent standard of living – nothing more or less.

    They’ve been willing to support any government, fascist or liberal, which provided that. And contrary to liberalism’s self-inflated image, liberalism has increasingly failed to meet either their social or economic needs.

    The alleged “victory” of what is cynically called “liberal democracy” today came only after decades of unprecedented slaughter and chaos capped with relentless propaganda.

    White people worldwide look back on this now and ask “is this what our forefathers fought for?”

    Contrary to the Fukiyama hubris, there is no “arc of history” to be “ended” or “won.”

    The century of Jewish power deceitfully mislabeled “the American Century” was just another bloody chapter in the centuries-long struggle between Zio-supremacists who’ve given themselves a divine mandate to rule us all and the world’s goyim. The governments change but the struggle remains.

  8. It seems what has happened in the US re holocaust museums is coming to the UK i.e. one is being built at the side of the Houses of Parliament. The promoter is Jewish philanthropist Gerald Ronson. He was jailed in the UK 30 years ago for share manipulation. The other three convicted with him all have strong Jewish links. One was released early from prison because he had Alzheimer disease but he made a full recovery subsequently (Ernest Saunders). They were caught when another Jew Ivan “Greed is Good” Boesky made a plea bargain in the US.

    Ronson has given money to the Princes Trust amongst other causes and has subsequently received a CBE.

    Despite multiple courts in the UK upholding his conviction he cannot seem to admit any wrongdoing.
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/1723136.stm

    Perhaps all the Churches being emptied in the UK (the media have a lot answer for) can be turned into holocaust centres and not just pubs.

    • Replies: @mulga mumblebrain
  9. Thomasina says:

    Another excellent article.

    It’s never a good idea to put a non-native animal into a native space, especially when the non-native animal has an agenda and is aggressive, unscrupulous and unrelenting in the pursuit of it. Jews have acted like an “invasive species”, getting themselves into the dominant position and pushing the natives into a corner.

    Here’s the New York Times explaining how invasive species aren’t always bad:

    “Often, he and others say, “invasion” is just another word for “change.” And the only thing that is certain is that more change is to come. Already, the flora and fauna of countries around the world are more homogeneous than they once were, as globalization has, accidentally or intentionally, moved exotic species from one place to another.”

    See, it’s just “change”. Nothing to get worked up about, they say; nothing to fight. The natives simply must change to accommodate the non-natives.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/01/science/invasive-species.html

    • Agree: Hangnail Hans
    • Replies: @mulga mumblebrain
  10. Thomasina says:

    And here’s a simple TED Talk titled “Learning the Ways of Invasive Species”:

    She says:

    “Now the war against invasive species, like any other war, is not only about the big gory battles. It’s also about espionage. It’s about getting to know your enemy.”

    In her talk she describes what happened when the American mink was introduced into Europe. “So we have brought upon ourselves a very, very powerful enemy. We’re talking here about an animal that can swim like an otter, that can climb trees like a cat, and that can hunt on land like a fox.”

    The American mink in Europe faced no predator. It became the predator. Very similar to what’s happened in the West – the predator needs a predator. The natives must recognize there is an enemy in their midst who is intentionally changing their way of life and they must stop them.

    • Agree: donut
  11. US is a Jewish supremacist gangster state.

    Jews lied about the Hunter Biden emails. Rudy Giuliani spoke the truth. Jews did everything to destroy Giuliani, but he still cucks to Zionists.



    Video Link

    • Agree: RodAxel
    • Replies: @Tucker
  12. Nancy says:

    Why is it so hard for so many to see? They succeed by strict nepotism and blackmail… which is not playing fair. But they rub our noses in OUR need to play fair …. becaue we have universal principles… they have only ‘is it good for Jews?’. Why can’t we replace ‘anti-semite’ with ‘anti-goy’ and attach our ‘hatred’ of their totally unprincipled and untrustworthy ‘behavior’? which doesn’t belong in our Western culture.

    • Replies: @frontier
  13. How did George Washington not see the danger?

    “As in other letters to Jewish congregations, the President explicitly acknowledges Jewish participation in the new nation. However, the Newport letter stands out for its clear and unequivocal language. Washington writes, “May the Children of the Stock of Abraham, who dwell in this land, continue to merit and enjoy the good will of the other Inhabitants.”

    https://www.tourosynagogue.org/history-learning/gw-letter

    • Replies: @HeebHunter
  14. Al Ross says:

    The Semitic etiology of legal pluralism , may lie in the dichotomy of written Mosaic Law ( tablet ) and self – serving Rabbinical Word .

    Of course, had Americans heeded Ben Franklin , the only luminary who apprehended the nature and certain danger of the alien tribe , then the US might have adhered to a less disputatious ( and lucrative ) legal system

  15. Pablo says:
    @Rational

    Cohen was a Warrior for what Jewish Activists do; Wage a War of Destruction on the White Western Races and their Institutions and Values. It was all promoted under the guise of “Multiculturalism” and “Diversity”. Jewish Hatemongers like Felix Cohen were fully aware of what they were doing and their intentions were malevolent. History is FILLED with examples of wars and other kinds of violence because of Multiculturalism and Diversity. The Jewish hatemongers like Felix Cohen were FULLY aware of this fact. It is the REAL reason why Jews like Cohen promoted “Multiculturalism” and “Diversity”.

  16. If you please the Jews. lots of carrots for you.

    ROTFL

  17. This type of ‘anal-lysis’, which concentrates on racialist explanations for social changes, but ignores class and economic factors, is just more Divide and Rule garbage. Working people of ALL ‘races’ have more in common that they do with the parasite elites, who manipulate these divisive ideologies, and even more bizarre manifestations like Wokeism, trans-gender politics and various paranoid delusions like QAnon etc. All the last, I would bet, run by the FBI, CIA and the rest of the Deep State ‘hidden hands’.

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
  18. @Thomasina

    Typically dumb NYT garbage, which ignores the question of speed. Invasions by novel species, or the increasing dominance of species better suited to changed ecological conditions, occur slowly, or catastrophically. 99% of species that ever existed are extinct, but the rate of extinction is paramount. Today extinction is occurring three or more orders of magnitude than in the past, and accelerating. The dominance of Jewish elites in the West is more akin, in my opinion, to the invasion of ant and other insect brains by fungal spores, that drive the host creature mad and suicidal. To be precise, I do NOT believe all Jews to be thus, only the parasitic elites (who use lumpen Jews as ‘human shields’)and their goy fellow travellers and stooges.

  19. @Jack McArthur

    An ‘Holocaust Museum cum Memorial’ in EVERY town! Memorials to other victims of genocide eg the Indigenous in the New World, Indian and Chinese peasants, Armenians, Assyrians, Herero etc, need NOT apply.

  20. Tucker says:
    @Priss Factor

    And, jews DID everything possible to destroy Trump and he still cucks to the jews.

  21. gotmituns says:

    the lousy jews have taken over all the law schools and have infected our judicial system over 6-7 decades now. Worst of all are the federal courts.

  22. Oracle says:
    @long game

    If it is a honey pot site, then it will be capturing those who are logical and have the ability to figure out what’s going on. Unfortunately, that class of people seems to be smaller than it should be.

    • Replies: @Weaver
  23. Tjoe says:

    Every American should be forced to read what the Talmud has to say about them….Christians and Catholics specifically.

  24. First, let’s clarify the language used by Jewish activists to describe the situation. Jews are not “liberal” in outlook. They are totalitarian and their politics are such that absolute control is ultimately vested in the hands of a small clique of self-appointed rulers.

    “For Cohen, this involved the “personal hope that American law could remedy wrongs against Jews, specifically forced exclusion.”…
    The primary weapon in this fight would be the promotion of pluralism within American law, both by expanding the concept of citizenship and weakening America’s borders.”

    This is the sleight of hand of Jewish intellectualism; to turn their private concerns into universal causes. To dress up their self interest in the clothes of transcendent Ideals. To pretend that what they are really concerned about is the fate of a broader humanity.

    And to think, for this charade they are (self)awarded prizes and regarded with awe by the rubes. You gotta give em credit though; many of them have the sentiments and morals of a carnival barker and manage to pull it off. (Course they do this by using the good ones as a shield).

  25. Weaver says:
    @Oracle

    We’re as much threat as Alaskan Eskimos who complain that once they were more numerous and not addicted to alcohol. If there’s someone gathering info from here, he’s no different from some girl collecting a shirt from some rock star she saw in concert. In theory, info can be used towards some Machiavellian end; but the person using it would need to be competent. What group would even trust its members to read posts here, lest they be influenced?

    If crime continues to go up, to give an example, more people are going to support the police and support gun rights. Things have a way of balancing. Whenever the economy collapses, immigration will likely reduce, support for mass immigration will reduce.

    If not for the economic boom in the 90s, things might have then turned for the US.

    It’s always possible the worst hypotheticals happen; I certainly fear at times being put in some camp. But if we get to a point where people are put in camps due to something written online, it’ll be a hellish society for everyone already.

  26. geokat62 says:

    “The greatest danger to American institutions comes from those who could cut off the living stream [immigration] that has been the source of our national life. …” – Felix Cohen

    As events have unfolded these past five decades, the greatest danger to American institutions came from those who opened up the living stream [immigration] that has been the source of our national death. …

    • Agree: Bookish1
  27. AaronB says:

    It’s obviously an Enlightenment project, and nothing to do with Jews or Jewishness.

    The Enlightenment project wants to create Universal Man and Universal Culture based on Reason.

    All specific cultures must be abolished, and specific ethnic groups cannot be admitted to have innate attributes that stand in the way of Reason to shape mankind to it’s will. In other words, “nature” cannot stand in the way of Reason’s unlimited power.

    Jews have a high average intelligence, so are disproportionately attracted to the idea that Reason can shape mankind to it’s will, and that “nature” has no power to stop man.

    But it’s the old Promethean/Faustian project that is at the center of European culture – created by gentile Whites, and disproportionately embraced by assimilated Jews, but also the modern religion of high intelligence Whites.

    Still, on the symbolic/mythical level, it makes total sense why unintelligent Whites would blame Jews (increasingly, I am noticing low IQ “redneck” Asians, like the Korean Twinkie, also embrace the symbolic mythology surrounding Jews) for this Enlightenment project created by gentile Whites.

    Mythically, Jews “stand for” the forces of intelligence and abstraction, more clearly than any other group. Of course, high intelligence Whites not only created the Enlightenment project, but are even more overwhelming and total in it’s embrace than Jews, and many Jews are traditional and reject it.

    Still, we are dealing with the symbolic/mythic level here – and it is compelling on that level.

    Like nearly all – perhaps all – White Nationalists, Andrew Joyce is illiterate with regard to European intellectual history, not knowing about the Enlightenment, it’s principles, aims, and goals, or the Promethean/Faustian character of European culture.

    To White Nationalists, Europeans are simple minded naifs, traditional country folk, and not the great World-Historical civilization which destroyed all tradition and transformed the world.

    So it’s understandable that they find the development of elite White gentile culture utterly incomprehensible.

    Sophisticated and far reaching ideas like the creation of a universal culture based on reason, require a minimum level of intelligence to comprehend – much less find appealing.

    To the unintelligent, explanations based on an “enemy” rather than subtle and sophisticated developments of your own culture make far more rough and ready sense, and do not require much thinking, or reading in European intellectual history and understanding it’s trends and principles, etc.

    • Thanks: Wizard of Oz
    • Troll: John Gruskos
    • Replies: @geokat62
    , @AaronB
  28. geokat62 says:
    @AaronB

    It’s obviously an Enlightenment project, and nothing to do with Jews or Jewishness.

    It’s the Enlightenment, goy!

    To White Nationalists, Europeans are simple minded naifs, traditional country folk, and not the great World-Historical civilization which destroyed all tradition and transformed the world.

    You mean to Jewish Nationalists, Europeans are simple minded naifs, traditional country folk, and not the great Jewish Supremacists, who injected the West with the poison of Cultural Marxism, that led to the destruction of all tradition and transformed the world.

    Sophisticated and far reaching ideas like the creation of a universal culture based on reason, require a minimum level of intelligence to comprehend – much less find appealing.

    Creation of a universal culture? Is that what Zionism/Judaism is, Aaron?

    Yeah and lest we forget, the Frankfurters were merely a continuation of the ideals expounded by the great intellectual thinkers of the Enlightenment. They so deeply embraced these universalist ideals that they forgot to apply them to their beloved Jewish ethno-state, lol

    It’s ethno-nationalism for me, but not for thee, goy!

    • Agree: John Regan
  29. @Sick of Orcs

    Because merchants and kikes are the same.

  30. AaronB says:
    @AaronB

    The funny thing is, on the level of myth, it really is the “Jews” who are the enemy.

    The unintelligent White dimly intuits that it is the “people of the mind”, the “people of abstraction”, who are launching this attack on his concrete biological race and traditional culture.

    It’s too complicated to grasp that a complex evolution of elements of his own culture created this – in symbolic “shorthand”, he knows who the enemy is – the “mind people”, which, to the unintelligent, are “the Jews”.

    (I use unintelligent White here for relevance, but the unintelligent Jew or Asian has the same thought process – and we know there numerically far more highly intelligent Whites than Jews in America)

    And indeed, the Enlightenment is an attack on biology – it is an attack on nature. It was gentile White British philosopher John Locke, who invented and popularized the notion of the “Blank Slate”, which denies biology and nature, and is the central plank of modern intellectual belief.

    The unintelligent person, cannot understand that this brutal assault on his biology and traditional culture is motivated by “benevolent” reasons as understood by those doing the assault – by a sincere desire to “make the world a better place”, however misguided and blind.

    A simple minded person can only understand simple motives of selfishness and desire to gain power – therefore the “mind-people”, the “Jews”, can only be motivated by desire for power and can only be a racial enemy.

    On another level, one must be somewhat stupid to think Reason has infinite power to shape man to his will, and nature and biology don’t exist – so in fact the highly intelligent “mind-people” suffer from a kind of stupidity all their own.

    And the “mind-people”, end up being in a sense stupider than the simple minded.

    The Enlightenment project was hubris – and ended destroying much of the beauty, charm, and magic of the world. Still, though, one must no more blame gentile Whites for inventing it than Jews for being unable to resist it. The fight is against “ideas*.

    A simple minded person, also, has trouble understanding a fight against “powers and principalities”, in the old Christian phrase. That is very abstract. An enemy who is flesh and blood, with simple motives of power – that is comprehensible.

    • Replies: @geokat62
    , @Weaver
    , @Mevashir
  31. Bookish1 says:
    @mulga mumblebrain

    You forgot the memorials to all those whites who died in Jewish wars.

  32. aandrews says:

    In a way, this is hilarious.


    Latin American Migration, Once Limited to a Few Countries, Turns Into a Mass Exodus

    By Juan Montes, Ryan Dube and Kejal Vyas
    Sept. 22, 2021 11:08 am ET

    A far broader mix of nationalities is turning up at the border than in the past. For decades, most crossers were Mexican men and, in recent years, families from the troubled Central American countries of Guatemala, Honduras and El Salvador, known as the Northern Triangle.

    Suddenly Ecuadoreans, Brazilians, Nicaraguans, Venezuelans, Haitians and Cubans are turning up by the hundreds of thousands, a trend that accelerated sharply in the past six months.

    On to Plan “B”.

    • Replies: @aandrews
  33. geokat62 says:
    @AaronB

    It was gentile White British philosopher John Locke, who invented and popularized the notion of the “Blank Slate”…

    It’s true! Most don’t know this, but Locke was also the inventor and populariser of multiculturalism. Don’t believe me, well here’s the quote that proves it:

    “I think there is a resurgence of anti-gentile White British philosophers because at this point in time Europe has not yet learned how to be multicultural. And I think we are going to be part of the throes of that transformation, which must take place. Europe is not going to be the monolithic societies they once were in the last century. Gentile White British philosophers are going to be at the centre of that. It’s a huge transformation for Europe to make. They are now going into a multicultural mode and gentile White British philosophers will be resented because of our leading role. But without that leading role and without that transformation, Europe will not survive.” – John Locke

  34. Weaver says:
    @AaronB

    Sometimes Jews are blamed unfairly, but the current situation paints them badly. The current situation is also partly due to whites just having it too good in the US. We became corrupted.

    And the “mind-people”, end up being in a sense stupider than the simple minded.

    That’s partly why Dr. Fleming said something odd about how he likes the thinking of women better than men; because men think in abstraction, embrace radical ideologies. I’m misquoting Dr. Fleming there. I just can’t remember his exact wording. I just wanted to give credit that “men –> bad ideology”, came from him.

    Moving on, Jews tend to like the Enlightenment; they were “freed,” they say. It’s well that you question that revolution.

    As for “helping,” people tend to believe in ideologies that serve their interests. A rich skilled worker who easily rose in society will tend to be libertarian. A poor worker who, for whatever reason, needed more money to thrive in school, or to otherwise excel, will want more government involvement.

    Some Jews currently seem to dream that they’ll become an aristocracy of the world. They openly talk of sending Muslims to Europe, to create an amalgam. The hatred for Europeans is palpable. That annoys me. I don’t then hate them… But partly their thinking is they’ll inherit the world, have everyone else be their servants. That comes from religion. Whites can say similar things too, certainly, but it’s annoying all the same.

    Solzhenitsyn paints Jews much better than Americans would suspect in the Bolshevik movement. But he also highlights that Jews more easily acted against Slavs, because Jews weren’t Slavic. That difference in nationality was pertinent.

    I agree that “blame Jews” can lead to error, because there are serious flaws with American political ideas. We weren’t conquered in war. No natural disaster befell us. The current situation is pitiful. For the most part I feel the same as you. However, (Francis rebut of Gottfried): https://www.toqonline.com/archives/v3n2/TOQv3n2Francis.pdf

    • Replies: @AaronB
  35. Mevashir says:

    RON UNZ FOR PRESIDENT

    [MORE]

    I don’t know where to post this comment so I’m arbitrarily choosing this post. Perhaps Ron can run it as a feature article instead.

    A friend sent me some links about Ron’s prior political activism. I wasn’t aware of these things, since I lived overseas from 1982-2006 when Ron’s activism was occurring:

    https://www.thenation.com/article/archive/ron-unz-why-i-dropped-my-ballot-initiative-raise-californias-minimum-wage/tnamp/
    https://abcnews.go.com/amp/Politics/conservative-millionaires-quest-raise-californias-minimum-wage-12/story?id=21034525
    https://www.thecrimson.com/article/2016/4/14/ron-unz-donations/
    https://www.laweekly.com/being-ron-unz/
    https://manifoldlearning.com/episode-010-transcript/

    I found these links pretty interesting as they show that Ron clearly has valuable experience both campaigning and fundraising. I realize that, in more recent years, his UR presence has become more counter-cultural and therefore more vulnerable to defamation by the LameStreamMedia.

    I think Ron’s biggest challenge in running for President will be choosing a running mate and advisors, since he seems to like flying solo. But consider these:

    Unz means Us in Yiddish, so he would be US President US. Has a nice ring to it.

    His initials RU are the domain name for Russia on the worldwideweb, which might appeal to them.

    He has slightly Asiatic looks that might appeal to our Chinese frenemies.

    He could choose his entire cabinet right off the pages of the UR:

    Fred Reed for Press Secretary (just make sure he isn’t drunk or stoned before he gets behind the podium)

    Jared Taylor for Secretary of HHS where he can implement some of his wise racialist policies right here at home.

    Mike Whitney for head of CDC or FDA.

    Philip Giraldi for National Security Advisor

    Kevin Barrett for special envoy to the Middle East

    Paul Craig Roberts for Labor Secretary or Head of the FED.

    Confer honorary American citizenship on Israel Shamir and make him ambassador to Israel.

    Jonathan Revusky for Secretary of State: he’s multi-lingual and his Jewish and Chinese heritage would give him international appeal. He also plays chess which will give him immediate appeal to the Russians.

    Vice President would be a tough choice. Maybe Tulsi Gabbardfor a ticket of Brains and Beauty. Or maybe Noam Chomsky, so America would be led by two Jewish geniuses, one right and one left, but both anti-Zionist.

    I would not recommend that President Unz convene a new 9/11 Truth investigation, as warranted as it is, because it would degenerate into an ugly slugfest like Muller’s Russia investigation, waste time and money, and distract Americans from the pressing concerns of the here and the now. I would rather simply proceed on the assumption that Israel was behind the 9/11 attacks and punish them diplomatically by:

    1. Eliminating their annual $7 bn tribute from Congress.
    2. Registering AIPAC as a foreign lobbyist
    3. Rescinding tax exempt status for donations to all Zionist organizations and classifying such organizations as terrorist groups.
    4. Eliminating the dual citizenship provision for Israeli-Americans
    5. Forcing American Jews holding public office or security positions in the military, FBI, CIA, NSA etc to take a loyalty oath to America and to renounce obeisance to Israel.

    I also would recommend that Ron address a pressing current concern to establish his policy perspective for the American public. I think the homeless crisis in Los Angeles is an excellent opportunity for him to establish some credibility in breaking through the paralysis over this colossal human tragedy and public health menace.

    My view is the following:

    The 50K homeless in Los Angeles County should be placed in a gigantic FEMA style work camp. They will be provided room board clothing and medical care in exchange for labor at various camp run industries. Those who won’t cooperate with such a program should be evicted from the city and deported to Death Valley where they can enjoy the company of jackals coyotes rattlesnakes scorpions and cactus.

    The FEMA camp can be operated like Auschwitz. It can adopt the motto Arbeit Macht Frei, with a unique American twist: AMF = American Mother F*ckers. It can have all those wonderful amenities the Holocaust Revisionists insist were available to the prisoners of Auschwitz: post offices, movie theaters, soccer fields, swimming pools, and libraries. This can become a model camp for all of America and if it works it can be applied across the nation coast to coast. We might even ask the Chinese to run the camps for us on the model of Xin Jiang Province.

    So Ron, what do you say? Will you kick things into high gear? Clearly Biden is a failure and nobody wants a Trump II presidency in 2024. You might have some problems with the Evangelical vote, but if they can support Netanyahu, who is a a brutal cynical and historically illiterate secularist, there’s no reason they cannot come around to you: a thoughtful and subtle Jewish conservative. And if you can fake a Come-to-Jesus moment you’ll be home free!

    • Replies: @Mevashir
  36. “Build Back Better”? What losers we have.

  37. Mevashir says:
    @AaronB

    The Enlightenment project was hubris – and ended destroying much of the beauty, charm, and magic of the world. Still, though, one must no more blame gentile Whites for inventing it than Jews for being unable to resist it. The fight is against “ideas*.

    The Enlightenment was an understandable reaction against centuries of bloody internecine Christian warfare that decimate and exhausted Europe. Read some history Aaron.

  38. “Washburn is skeptical about Cohen’s selfless altruism to say the least. He points out that Cohen once wrote “The Indian plays much the same role in our American society that the Jews played in Germany.”[19]”

    No wonder the Anglo-Saxon elite lost control of America, given the ideas of Washburn comparing the powers of Jews in Germany (they had Germans by the balls) to a people (native Americans) who were completely and utterly defeated and humiliated. What a crock of shit!

  39. Mevashir says:
    @Mevashir

    HOW TO DEAL WITH ISRAEL IN THE AFTERMATH OF 9/11:

    [MORE]

    1. Eliminate their annual $7 bn tribute from Congress.
    2. Register AIPAC as a foreign lobbyist
    3. Rescind tax exempt status for donations to all Zionist organizations and classify such organizations as terrorist groups.
    4. Eliminate the dual citizenship provision for Israeli-Americans
    5. Force American Jews holding public office or security positions in the military, FBI, CIA, NSA etc to take a loyalty oath to America and to renounce obeisance to Israel.
    6. Place a permanent travel advisory on travel to Israel, that will hinder the year-round Christian pilgrimages where they get brainwashed by Zionist propaganda and turned into Mossad sayanim.
    7. Ban all cooperation programs between American law enforcement and the Zionists.
    8. Ban Congressional junkets to Ziostan where they are bribed and blackmailed into surrendering to the Zionist agenda.
    9. Immediately recognize the Palestinian State, whose final borders are indeterminate just like those of the Ziostan.
    10. Close the American Embassy in Jerusalem and operate only a consulate in Tel Aviv.

    The best thing for America would be to force Israel into an overt alliance with Russia and/or Saudi Arabia. Let Putin juggle the balls of his infatuation with Jewish power and his desire for strategic alliances with Syria and Iran. Let it be his headache as we sit back laughing at the absurdity of it all.

    • Replies: @Mevashir
    , @Mevashir
  40. If you want to see what the zionists are all about, read the book The Controversy of Zion by Douglas Reed it can be had on amazon and read The Protocols of Zion.

    The Zionists control every facet of the ZUS government and with their privately owned FED and IRS they are destroying America.

  41. aandrews says:
    @aandrews

    I wonder if $8 trillion would’ve alleviated these people’s problems in their home countries?

  42. geokat62 says:

    Frans Timmermans, the Vice President of the European Commission, gave the following speech saying that Europe is not allowed to remain majority European:

    “Diversity is now in some parts of Europe seen as a threat. Diversity comes with challenges. But diversity is humanity’s destiny. There is not going to be, even in the remotest places of this planet, a nation that will not see diversity in its future [he forgot to mention the one exception to this rule, you guessed it the Jewish ethno-state of Apartheid Israel]. That’s where humanity is heading. And those politicians trying to sell to their electorates a society that is exclusively composed of people from one culture, are trying to portray a future based on a past that never existed, therefore that future will never be. Europe will be diverse, like all other parts of the world will be diverse. The only question is, how do we deal with that diversity? And my answer to that is, by ensuring that our values determine how we deal with diversity and not giving up our values to refuse diversity. That will bring us down as a society.

    If we don’t get this right, I truly believe Europe will not remain the Europe we built. Europe will not remain a place of peace and freedom, for very long.

    I expected him to conclude his speech with these words:

    “If we don’t get this right, I truly believe Europe will not survive.”

    … but I guess he probably realised it would sound too much like Barbara Lerner Spectre’s infamous speech.

    Did a little digging on Frans Timmermans’ background.

    He was apparently awarded the Lord Jakobovits Prize for European Jewry:

    A European leader has told the continent’s Jewish community “I will always be there for you” as he was awarded the Lord Jakobovits Prize for European Jewry.

    Speaking at the Great Synagogue in Brussels, First Vice-President of the European Commission Frans Timmermans said: “I will always be there for you, I will always defend your rights and I will always stand by you.”

    https://jewishnews.timesofisrael.com/eu-leader-tells-europes-jews-i-will-always-be-there-for-you/

    While one source claims he’s half Jewish…

    http://www.renegadetribune.com/eu-minister-says-future-will-not-white-europe-will-diverse/

    this is difficult to confirm as his Early Life section on Wikipedia says absolutely nothing about his parents.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frans_Timmermans

    • Thanks: aandrews
  43. Jim H says:

    “The Indian plays much the same role in our American society that the Jews played in Germany.”

    … and that the Palestinians play in Israel.

    And so the abused (still bitterly complaining via their state-funded loudspeaker of holocaust education) become the abusers (which cannot be spoken or written about in mainstream discourse).

    An abused child who grows up to become an abusive parent is still subject to legal consequences. But Israel — ‘the little country that never grew up’ — has exempted itself from laws it disapproves of, such as submitting its nuclear weapons to IAEA inspection.

    Israel is humanity’s misfortune.

  44. GMC says:

    The people that came to Alaska in the mid 30s were called Colonists and they got 160 acres for farms in the Matanuska Valley – mainly near Palmer, just east of Anchorage. The land was very fertile , whereas some of the black dirt went down as far as 8 feet. There is no permafrost this far from the artic circle.The winters were fairly nice but many of these people were from Minnesota, Wisconsin etc. so it was not a big deal. After WW II a lot of GIs that were in Alaska and those that worked on the ALCAN hiway moved up too. I couldn’t see that these people were Jewish tho – if they were, they sure didn’t have a synagogue, as far I could see . I moved there in 74 and knew many of these families. We had it — made back then. Good clean living.

  45. AaronB says:
    @Weaver

    Moving on, Jews tend to like the Enlightenment; they were “freed,” they say. It’s well that you question that revolution.

    As for “helping,” people tend to believe in ideologies that serve their interests. A rich skilled worker who easily rose in society will tend to be libertarian. A poor worker who, for whatever reason, needed more money to thrive in school, or to otherwise excel, will want more government involvement.

    Secular, assimilated Jews do, but i don’t know if that’s most. Traditional Jews certainly don’t.

    There’s a lot of truth to people believing in ideologies which serve their interests.

    But I think this is why high IQ populations will be drawn to the Enlightenment – it values smarts and puts smart people in charge, and suggests intelligence has no limits.

    I’m sure you know, that high IQ Whites are just as Left as Jews – possibly more so.

    Some Jews currently seem to dream that they’ll become an aristocracy of the world. They openly talk of sending Muslims to Europe, to create an amalgam. The hatred for Europeans is palpable. That annoys me. I don’t then hate them… But partly their thinking is they’ll inherit the world, have everyone else be their servants. That comes from religion. Whites can say similar things too, certainly, but it’s annoying all the same.

    This is nuts, dude. Where have you seen Jews say they will become an aristocracy (non-crazy, mainstream Jews)?

    Leftist Whites are just as pro-Muslim immigration to Europe as Leftist Jews – can it be because destroying traditional cultures and creating Universal Man is part of the Enlightenment project?

    And that Enlightenment thinking even says there cannot be any innate racial differences that stand in the way of Reason to reshape mankind.

    I agree that “blame Jews” can lead to error, because there are serious flaws with American political ideas

    Not just American ideas, but the major ideas of the West.

    This whole thing that’s going on – attacking tradition, attacking nature and biology, creating a universal culture – is a project developed by White Europeans.

    But I don’t blame the “White race” – I understand the fight is against “ideas”, not flesh and blood people.

    If you fail to grapple with these ideas not as petty tribal politics but as a major religious vision for the world, you’ll never be able to defeat them.

  46. @mulga mumblebrain

    I’m not sure how much we would agree but your reference to class pointed to one of the concepts missing from this article. Another is the failure to follow through on pluralism rather than multiculturalism. I can’t say I’ve always borne the distinction in mind but I like the pluralism which presupposes a tolerant dominant culture in contrast to multiculturalism where there is no central standard. The distinction is perhaps a little fuzzy round the edges because multicultural (if that’s what it is) Australia does try, for example, to draw the line at the mutilation of female genitalia. Not male of course. (Awright, alright not to be considered as part of genitalia but as cover for the end of the urinary tract).

    So, let there be a dominant culture, obviously built around an upper class. In China the non corrupt members of the CCP. For Anglocentric Australia still the concept of the English gentleman that the the private schools called “public schools” were founded to create. The trouble often has been that that apprentice gentleman is/was undermined by lack of intelligence. Which brings me to my observation that Jews often make the best sort of English gentleman. I imagine that there were many German Jews and half and quarter Jews who were much the same even to the point that they would have been courteous to little shits like Hitler.

    In Australia my observation is that, especially if a half Asian is charming and smart, class will trump race every time – at least among the smart.
    I doubt very much that Jewish influence in Australia was responsible for some supposed anti-white push for multiculturalism. Indeed I don’t see anything much to complain about in what we are told about Felix Cohen who at least wasn’t taking off the China to convert the poor chumps to Christianity. He was constantly reminded, by blatant antisemitism, that he was a Jew and that might have reminded him that he and his parents had been lucky and that, as decent people, they should not try to deny their good fortune to others. Much the same could be said of the Jewish part in ending Jim Crow and sponsoring the NAACP. If there were, consciously or unconsciously, mixed motive what, inherently is wrong with “doing well by doing good”.?

  47. @geokat62

    Who made up that silly quote and why? And why did you inflict it on us?

    • Replies: @Spender_CGB
  48. Fr. John says:

    “Jews have demonstrably been critical in the majority of significant legal developments in the advance of multiculturalism and cultural pluralism, both in Europe and in the United States.”

    Every Single Time.

    Can we make it 110?

  49. Jon Chance says: • Website

    Whether “Jews” are actually “Semitic” or not, the question must be raised:

    Is there any good reason why everyone should be compelled to be pro-Semitic and pro-Judaism?

    Isn’t this obligation to “love” (obey) Jews and Semites the most transparent form of tyranny ever forced upon Europeans, Asians, Africans, and others?

    What do “Semites” and “Jews” have to say about anti-Europeanism and anti-Asianism and anti-Africanism?

  50. Mevashir says:
    @Mevashir

    MORE ON HOW TO DEAL WITH ISRAEL IN THE AFTERMATH OF 9/11:

    Upon further reflection, I don’t think these recommendations are draconian enough. I would add:

    1. Close the American Embassy in Jerusalem (that Trump built with such expense) and leave it shuttered until such time as a single binational Jewish-Palestinian State emerges.

    2. Withdraw all American diplomatic personnel from Israel.

    3. Close the Israeli embassy in Washington DC and expel all its diplomats. Ditto with the Israeli consulates in Miami, New York, Atlanta, Chicago, San Francisco, Seattle and Los Angeles (exactly as Trump did to the Chinese in Houston).

    4. Give all Israeli nationals working here on work visas six months to set their affairs in order before they are expelled from the country.

    5. Severely restrict Israeli tourism to the USA. Treat Israeli tourists as Soviet Bloc citizens during the Cold War or North Koreans today. Consider every Israeli tourist a security threat.

    6. Because Jewish oaths to Gentiles are worthless, all neocohens and American Zionist sympathizers should be encouraged/forced to emigrate. A Transfer Agreement type program should be implemented whereby they are offered one-way plane fare to Ziostan along with a moving allowance. They will be exempt from all American income taxes once they formally renounce their American citizenship. They will surrender their American passports at the airport departure lounge. It is questionable if they should ever be allowed back into the USA even on a foreign tourist visa.

    7. Even though many American Jews are lukewarm about Zionism, almost all American rabbis de facto support it and must be regarded as sayyanim and therefore also should be encouraged to emigrate.

    8. Jewish religious communities like those proliferating across New York State should be removed from social welfare roles due to their refusal to submit to state education standards. They too should be encouraged to emigrate.

  51. Mevashir says:
    @Mevashir

    MORE ON HOW TO DEAL WITH ISRAEL IN THE AFTERMATH OF 9/11:

    [MORE]

    1. Eliminate their annual $7 bn tribute from Congress.
    2. Register AIPAC as a foreign lobbyist
    3. Rescind tax exempt status for donations to all Zionist organizations and classify such organizations as terrorist groups.
    4. Eliminate the dual citizenship provision for Israeli-Americans
    5. Force American Jews holding public office or security positions in the military, FBI, CIA, NSA etc to take a loyalty oath to America and to renounce obeisance to Israel.
    6. Place a permanent travel advisory on travel to Israel, that will hinder the year-round Christian pilgrimages where they get brainwashed by Zionist propaganda and turned into Mossad sayanim.
    7. Ban all cooperation programs between American law enforcement and the Zionists.
    8. Ban Congressional junkets to Ziostan where they are bribed and blackmailed into surrendering to the Zionist agenda.
    9. Immediately recognize the Palestinian State, whose final borders are indeterminate just like those of the Ziostan.
    10. Close the American Embassy in Jerusalem and operate only a consulate in Tel Aviv.
    The best thing for America would be to force Israel into an overt alliance with Russia and/or Saudi Arabia. Let Putin juggle the balls of his infatuation with Jewish power and his desire for strategic alliances with Syria and Iran. Let it be his headache as we sit back laughing at the absurdity of it all.

    Upon further reflection, I don’t think these recommendations are draconian enough. I would add:

    1. Close the American Embassy in Jerusalem (that Trump built with such expense) and leave it shuttered until such time as a single binational Jewish-Palestinian State emerges.

    2. Withdraw all American diplomatic personnel from Israel. Make sure American Christian tourists understand that if they travel there and experience any difficulties, they will not have access to American consular services. They will be on their own, like traveling to Taliban controlled Afghanistan or DPRNK under Kim.

    3. Close the Israeli embassy in Washington DC and expel all its diplomats. Ditto with the Israeli consulates in Miami, New York, Atlanta, Chicago, San Francisco, Seattle and Los Angeles (exactly as Trump did to the Chinese in Houston).

    4. Give all Israeli nationals working here on work visas six months to set their affairs in order before they are expelled from the country.

    5. Severely restrict Israeli tourism to the USA. Treat Israeli tourists as Soviet Bloc citizens during the Cold War or North Koreans today. Consider every Israeli tourist a security threat.

    6. Because Jewish oaths to Gentiles are worthless, all neocohens and American Zionist sympathizers should be encouraged/forced to emigrate. A Transfer Agreement type program should be implemented whereby they are offered one-way plane fare to Ziostan along with a moving allowance. They will be exempt from all American income taxes once they formally renounce their American citizenship. They will surrender their American passports at the airport departure lounge. It is questionable if they should ever be allowed back into the USA even on a foreign tourist visa.

    7. Even though many American Jews are lukewarm about Zionism, almost all American rabbis de facto support it and must be regarded as sayyanim and therefore also should be encouraged to emigrate.

    8. Jewish religious communities like those proliferating across New York State should be removed from social welfare roles due to their refusal to submit to state education standards. They too should be encouraged to emigrate.

  52. Mevashir says:
    @AaronB

    Secular, assimilated Jews do, but i don’t know if that’s most. Traditional Jews certainly don’t.

    Secular Jews are ~80% of the global Jewish population. What part of 80% isn’t “most” in your mathematical system?

  53. @Wizard of Oz

    This might help you.
    There is a spectre over Europe, a Barbara Lerner Spectre,

    • Replies: @Jim H
  54. geokat62 says:
    @AaronB

    … can it be because destroying traditional cultures and creating Universal Man is part of the Enlightenment project?

    As you well know, Universal Man isn’t part of the Enlightenment project, it’s part of the Noahide Project.

    It’s all about Tikkun olam!

    For those who are unfamiliar with the phrase Tikkun olam, it’s Hebrew for “fixing or repairing the world.”

    The Soviet Man was ushered in time for Tikkun olam 1.0, Communism aka Workers Paradise.

    When communism failed, the Progressive Man was ushered in time for Tikkun olam 2.0, Egalitarianism aka Wokers Paradise.

    When egalitarianism fails, they’ll usher in Universal Man in time for Tikkun olam 3.0, Universalism aka Noahide Paradise.

    As you and your brethren know only too well, Aaron, all these efforts at Tikkun olam will fail because what the Roman poet Horace admonished two millennia ago still remains true today:

    “You may drive out nature with a pitchfork, yet she’ll be constantly running back.” – Horace

    The only way they can “fix the goys” for good is if they manage to achieve their diabolical scheme to convert them into transhumans.

    Is that what Fauci et al are endeavouring to accomplish? Only the fullness of time will reveal their hidden agenda.

  55. The JEW/WASP Ruling Class of the American Empire re-conceptualized the USA from a European Christian nation to a so-called “proposition nation” in order to better fit the aspirations of globalized elements who wished to attack the European Christian ancestral core of the USA and to extinguish and destroy the historic American nation.

    Lawrence Auster on the Role of Jews in the Dispossession of White, Christian America:

    [MORE]

    Because of the Jews’ tragic history as a persecuted people, and because of their own ability, through their leading role in American intellectual life, to set the terms of permissible discourse, it is impossible in today’s society to have an honest discussion on the subject of Jewish cultural impact. While every other ethnic group can be spoken of in a critical light, if only to a very limited extent, nothing that is even implicitly critical is allowed to be said or inferred about Jews

    The Jews also (as few people recognize, because the subject is forbidden) changed America in some profound and not always positive ways. In terms of national identity, Jews were instrumental in the reformulation of America as a universalist society based strictly on ideology rather than on peoplehood, a change that set the stage for mass Third-World immigration and the much more profound redefinition of America as a multicultural society. In terms of morality, many Jewish intellectuals, writers, and entertainers deliberately undermined the older Anglo-American Victorian ethos, a program of moral/cultural subversion that climaxed in the Sixties counterculture and the dominant nihilist culture of the 1980s and 1990s. In terms of politics, Jews were instrumental in replacing the old American order of Constitutional self-restraint with the statist politics of unrestrained compassion.

    the elite universities had changed from guardian of the old Western order to its subverter. [See also here.] This transformation in the universities then reverberated through the rest of the culture, stripping America’s public institutions, entertainments, symbols, and manners of the Christian and bourgeois values they had once embodied. America’s transition from a Protestant culture whose public institutions, celebrations, and symbols reflected Christian belief, to a pluralist, secular society with no identity at all, was complete.

    Now that their enemies have been scattered and silenced, the left and the minorities can admit that their real agenda all along was not simply inclusion, equality, justice, or tolerance toward Jews and other minorities, but the destruction of the Christian culture.

    If an immigration law that is designed to preserve the nation’s ethnic majority is racist (because it implicitly puts down other groups), then the same must be true of any manifestation of the ethnic majority, including its very existence. After all, if a nation still has an ethnic majority, and a culture that reflects that majority, doesn’t that impute inferiority to all people not related by blood to that majority? Therefore the only way to procure real democracy is to turn the ethnic majority into a minority, which is to be accomplished (and since 1965 has largely been accomplished) by immigration.

    [MORE]

    The 1965 Immigration Act, the culmination of a forty-year, largely Jewish-led campaign, was not simply a piece of “liberal” legislation (i.e., an act aimed at formal equality) which later turned out to have unforeseen, radical consequences. As early as 1952, the liberal idea of equality before the law was already linked in the minds of Jewish immigrationists with the radical project of dispossessing America’s white, Anglo-Saxon, Christian majority.

    https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2013/03/13/lawrence-auster-on-the-role-of-jews-in-disestablishing-white-christian-america/

    Tweet from 2015:

    • Replies: @geokat62
  56. Mevashir says:
    @Rational

    So I have a heartfelt request to all Jewish alienists who promote immigration to USA/EU: Please, please, stop drinking our blood and cutting our throats and dumping enema on US. Please, please, go to your beloved Israel and leave us alone. We are sick and tired of your daily lies, lies, lies, lies, lies, lies………and all forms of Jewspeak, your daily abuse (calling patriots Nazis, etc.) Please go away, Judaists!!!!! Even dogs have more morals and would have gone by now. Why can’t you people get it? So go away, please.

    If a gang invaded your home and raped your wife and molested your children, would you beg them to play nice and leave? You’re a fool. The only language these thugs understand is force. Tough love and prudent hatred.

    You must expel them plain and simple. It’s not that hard. It just requires resolve.

    See (6) at this comment:
    https://www.unz.com/article/the-jewish-origins-of-american-legal-pluralism/#comment-4919276

  57. The now departed Jew writer Larry Auster nails it (1998):

    [MORE]

    The 1965 Immigration Act, the culmination of a forty-year, largely Jewish-led campaign, was not simply a piece of “liberal” legislation (i.e., an act aimed at formal equality) which later turned out to have unforeseen, radical consequences. As early as 1952, the liberal idea of equality before the law was already linked in the minds of Jewish immigrationists with the radical project of dispossessing America’s white, Anglo-Saxon, Christian majority.

    https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2013/03/13/lawrence-auster-on-the-role-of-jews-in-disestablishing-white-christian-america/

    Tweet from 2015:

  58. This book should be read by all:

    The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit by Dr. E. Michael Jones.

  59. HT says:

    Nearly every destructive social justice movement in America began with Jews. Civil rights, removal of Christianity from our culture, same sex marriage and other LGBT issues, abortion, etc all involved Jews. Yet, as with Negroes, whites are conditioned to ignore the damage Jews do. I had always thought what an evil monster Hitler must have been to hate a group of people so much. What I see now is he had a rare insight into just how much damage Jews can do and he essentially tried to get them before they got him.

  60. geokat62 says:
    @Charles Pewitt

    As early as 1952, the liberal idea of equality before the law was already linked in the minds of Jewish immigrationists with the radical project of dispossessing America’s white, Anglo-Saxon, Christian majority.

    Radical Jewish project? But, but, but, Aaron assures us it was an Enlightenment project.

  61. Andrew Joyce writes:

    Kevin MacDonald has explored Jewish activism in the period of White ethnic defense from around 1890 through the 1924 and 1952 immigration laws, and the intense Jewish opposition to those laws. The role of Jewish activism was critical in enacting the 1965 law which revolutionized American immigration legislation and permanently changed America’s demographic destiny.

    I say:

    It’s true the JEW/WASP Ruling Class of the American Empire pushed the nation-killing 1965 Immigration Act and it’s also true that Republican Party treasonous filth like Ted Cruz and Donald Trump still push nation-killing mass legal immigration. Donald Trump and Ted Cruz are in bed with the nation-killing interlopers in Jews Organized Globally(JOG) on mass legal immigration and mass illegal immigration and amnesty for illegal alien invaders and REFUGEE OVERLOAD and ASYLUM SEEKER INUNDATION.

    I asked this of Ted Cruz at a town hall campaign event in 2015:

    And as for immigration, It’s quite simply true that if it wasn’t for mass immigration — the 1965 Immigration Act — the Republicans might not have lost California forever. And it’s also true that without mass immigration we might never have had Obama — and that means we might never have had Obamacare.

    Mass legal immigration is the issue that’s demographically destroying the United States. But you, you support dramatic increases in mass immigration.

    I don’t think you can continue on trying to confuse the American people about the difference between illegal immigration and mass legal immigration — so why do you support mass legal immigration?

    Tweet from 2015:

    • Thanks: Weaver
  62. Jim H says:
    @Spender_CGB

    ‘There is a spectre over Europe, a Barbara Lerner Spectre’ — Spender_CGB

    What noxious chutzpah for an American Jew to force multiculturalism on Europe … whilst haughtily lecturing Europeans that they won’t survive as homogeneous cultures, contrary to millennia of evidence otherwise.

    Since every word that Barbara Lerner Spectre speaks is a monstrous, calculated lie, the truth is that Europe won’t survive her onslaught of alien cultural wreckers.

    America’s gain (by her departure) is Europe’s painful loss.

  63. frontier says:
    @Nancy

    They succeed by strict nepotism and blackmail… which is not playing fair. But they rub our noses in OUR need to play fair …. because we have universal principles…

    Fair play is good and proper but if it’s not a two-way street, it’s a dead end. The problem is precisely lack of universality which is implied by the lack of reciprocity. For example, only one group can be racists, only one group can be supremacists, etc, these labels are not universally applicable. Also, looking at this as a cultural attack, although not entirely wrong, is far from the truth. As Andrew Joyce noticed:

    While I agree with most people that law is often downstream from culture, I find it undeniable that sometimes the two operate simultaneously and in tandem, with law driving and reinforcing cultural change, and sometimes preceding it entirely. Thus, whoever holds legal power influences culture, just as much as they who influence culture can manipulate the law.

    It’s a valid observation which lacks just one element “Whoever has the gold, he makes the rules”. It took fifty odd years of financial witchcraft, a Great Depression and two world wars to arrive at the Hart–Celler Act of 1965. Nowadays our “representatives” have no clue who writes the laws, indeed, they seldom read them past the title but they know full well who pays their bills.

  64. While working on the bill, Cohen also published a lengthy article in the National Lawyer’s Guild Quarterly […]

    Perhaps worth noting here is that the National Lawyers’ Guild was a long-time Communist front.

    Wikipedia indicates,

    “According to historian Harvey Klehr, the NLG was allied with the Communist Party; in the 1930s a significant number of NLG founders had been members or fellow travelers of the Communist Party USA, including Riemer and Joseph Brodsky of the CP’s International Labor Defense auxiliary.”

    Describing the foundation of the NLG, the same article states the following:

    “On December 1, 1936, nearly 25 East Coast lawyers met at the City Club of New York to discuss creation of a new group counter to the conservative American Bar Association. United Auto Workers general counsel Maurice Sugar was instrumental in calling the meeting. Lawyers present included: Morris Ernst, Robert Silberstein and Mortimer Reimer of the Lawyers Security League, ACLU attorney Osmond Fraenkel, IJA-US founder Carol Weiss King, and union lawyer Henry Sacher.”

    Every one of those named appears to have been a Jew.

  65. Look at that! Only two Jews and how much destruction they caused for USA.



  66. Video Link

    This IRON DOME issue crystallizes the how things work within the US.

    Israel dropped lots of bombs on tiny Gaza and killed 1000’s. In contrast, Palestinian ‘rockets’ killed just a handful of Jews. So, if any people need something like Iron Dome defense, it’s the Palestinians, not the Jews. Jews kill many more Palestinians with bombs and missiles.

    But in the US, the debate is all about “What more can we do to protect the poor helpless Jews from those monstrous Palestinian terrorists.” It’s like saying we must defend a lion from a mouse. It’s like saying we must protect a tank full of IDF soldiers from a Palestinian child with a stone.

    And same logic applies to Jews and white goyim. Jews are in total supremacist mode, and their racial policy toward whites is now crazier than Nazi policy against Jews. Jewish Supremacists say ‘whiteness’ is filth and must be eradicated. Whites must become a people without identity, pride, or heritage. They must be obedient cattle who must feel, do, say, and act as Jews order them to.

    And yet, even though the American Way is all about Jewish Supremacists lording over and beating up on White Goyim, all we ever hear about is the dangers of ‘white supremacism’. Jews attack whites, but we must pretend whites are on the attack. It’s a total reversal of reality. What a batshit crazy world.

    • Agree: Robjil
  67. I used to believe the world is messed up because of unconnected coincidences. Now I see well-connected Cohencidences are the problem.

  68. @anonymous

    I think as journalist Mussolini was quite capable of writing his own political tracts I’m surprise you haven’t used that discredited quote of Mussolini regarding fascism and corporations.Clowns like you will do anything to besmerch fascism whether it’s true or not .Probably a jewish troll.

  69. Weaver says:
    @AaronB

    There’s a need for separate nation states, as an ideal.

    Part of the problem is the delusion that one group or another is superior to other groups and must replace or crush them. Such a delusion is foolish. Partly also, Jews have tended to reject all heritage when becoming secular, since they’re in foreign lands, as you seemed to note. Gentiles have at times as well, obviously.

    The issue is ideas; I agree. The goal is to preserve some meaning in the world, which you described earlier quite well. It’s pleasant that people be from somewhere, be part of something greater than themselves, have distinct traditions that can be compared with others’ as the human environment changes with technology and otherwise. It’s pleasant, at the least, that we retain a connection to God, as the Creator, as opposed to man as creator.

    Such a discussion becomes complicated. Who rightfully owns which piece of land? How is a stable system formed? It’s not easy, perhaps impossible.

    I disagree that whites are the primary driver of globalism, but perhaps. Anyway, I’m not trying to lecture you. I just wanted to express arguments.

    But to take Israel as an example: It’s none of my business. I want the US out. If Israelis can’t manage there, then try elsewhere. I want to preserve what’s possible in the world, generally speaking. While Israelis have the right to war, I don’t want to help support that destruction.

    And some sort of balance is needed in the US. If some balance can’t be reached, which again might even be impossible, the future might be some Orwellian or Frankenstein (Shelley) unpleasantness. I imagine you want to make the best of current society. Anyway, we’ll get to see how society turns out.

    It’s sadly much easier to destroy something than to preserve it.

  70. @geokat62

    John Locke, of East Cheam, c.1998, I would say. New depths of dumbness.

  71. @Wizard of Oz

    I certainly don’t believe that ‘the Jews’ as monolithic bloc, intent on world domination, exist. Jews are diverse, like all groups, and I admire socialist-minded Jews as well as their goy counterparts, even if preferring the universalism of the goyim.
    However Judaism, with its delusions of Jewish supremacy over all other groups, is, in my opinion, an evil cult, and one that spawned the wicked aspects of the other monotheisms, albeit that they practise less exclusivist and universal interpretations of the patriarchal tradition. However, the Judaic elites, in politics, business, particularly finance and the brain-washing apparatuses, are, in my opinion, malevolent to extraordinary degree. One need only think of the destruction of Corbyn with a campaign of the filthiest and most illogical lies, and now the destruction of the largest mass political party in Europe, UK Labour, by the Sabbat Goy stooge, Starmer (raising his children as Jews)to see that Evil in action.
    Other manifestations are myriad. These Jews are driven by their xenophobic cult to always seek total domination of the goyim, who they regard as a species of lesser beings, and as prey for financial and other pillage, and as a threat, whenever they, or segments of the majority, wake up to Jewish elite perfidy, and yet another pogrom, massacre or expulsion occurs. All these dreadful outbursts are, of course, entirely the fault of the goyim, driven by envy, malice or religious hatred, but never, ever, in ANY way, of the Jewish elites themselves. And now, with Israel’s nukes and its bio-warfare efforts, humanity is at their mercy. If you thought Bibi was Evil personified-what comes next?

    • Agree: Jett Rucker
    • Replies: @Weaver
    , @Wizard of Oz
  72. @mulga mumblebrain

    There are no memorials to the 1.5 million Irish who were starved to death by the English in their drive to depopulate Ireland and this Holocaust is without controversy

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
  73. E_Perez says:

    … Cohen once wrote “The Indian plays much the same role in our American society that the Jews played in Germany.”

    This absurd statement alone shows the dishonesty of this Jew.

    Jews were never native to Germany. Some escaped from their Pale-of-Settlement to take advantage of the German education system, but most of them invaded Germany after WWI to make profits in the chaos, depravity and sell-out in prostrated Weimar Germany.

    It’s more that the Germans were victims of the Jewish invaders.

  74. @mulga mumblebrain

    seeing as the architects of the Armenian Genocide were crypto Jews, that the Turks were supported by the Jew political power to suppress recognition of the Armenian Genocide in the USA for over 100 years and the zionist Jews supplying the Azeri Turks with modern drones and satelite support last year to continue the genocide against Nagorno Karabagh Armenians… one can hardly expect to see a plethora of Genocide museums spring up anytime soon. More importantly, the USA should demand reparations for the Armenian Genocide from Turkey, reestablish the Wilson Arbitral Award of 1920 and make Erdogan pay the way the Jews make the Germans pay in perpetuity…. wishful thinking in this zionist colony of JSA….. we will just be happy if the fucking Azeri Turks stop torturing the Armenian prisoners of war that they captured and release them according to the Geneva convention.

    • Agree: Jett Rucker
    • Replies: @Weaver
  75. Jett Rucker says: • Website

    I would be fascinated to know the details (unfindable) of the death of Cohen “at his home” at the young age of 46. Excessive altruism? It’s SOMETHING unmentionable, and in 1953, it wasn’t AIDS.
    Syphilis? Drug overdose? Alcoholism? Probably not gunshot, or violent murder.
    It would appear he fought Nazism from his home in Washington, DC, where his services administering Indian legal matters were no doubt vital to the war effort.

    • Replies: @E_Perez
  76. E_Perez says:
    @Jett Rucker

    I would be fascinated to know the details (unfindable) of the death of Cohen “at his home” at the young age of 46. Excessive altruism?

    This is a good one … thanks for the laugh.

    If “excessive altruism” were a cause of death, we would have got rid of the Gates, Rockefellers, Carnegies, Soros, Shakiras and other plagues since a long time.

    It would appear he fought Nazism from his home in Washington, DC,

    Oh, yeah, like most of his correligonaries…

    …where his services administering Indian legal matters were no doubt vital to the war effort.

    No. Vital to the war effort were not Indian legal matters, but Anglo-Saxon stupidity.
    And they currently pay a high price for it.

  77. @Abbott Hall

    My first Australian ancestor was an Irish Catholic convict but I remember hearing nothing of the Irish famine being any more Nazi style genocidal than Indian famines were. Bo doubt one might find some diary entries withv”tough love” expressions like “they’ve been breeding like rabbits now for 100 years and living on spuds so perhaps it will be for the best in the long run” but maybe you can find something to support your comparison with the Holocaust?

    • Replies: @Weaver
    , @Colin Wright
  78. Weaver says:
    @mulga mumblebrain

    The oldest Palestinian graveyard, 4200 years old, was recently destroyed. Slowly, every old building, every mark that another people ever lived in Palestine, is being destroyed.

    The spirit is reflected in this shocking statement which JTA condemns, that Jews must tear down holy sites and do other things. Anyway, it’s a shocking quote: https://www.jta.org/2009/06/01/culture/chabad-rabbi-destroy-their-holy-sites-kill-men-women-and-children-and-cattle

    As with any of this, you can find white Gentiles saying or doing the same. It’s a difference of degree, not kind, except that it stems from the religion. Christianity tolerates other heritage provided it is adapted to be Christian. But in the modern struggle, we seem to be under threat that everything which gives meaning or value to life could vanish. We also lose our records of the past. We can only study the past until our sources are gone; then, we just have records of the records.

  79. Weaver says:
    @Colonel Dolma

    Armenia seems doomed, and the US media refuses to cover it. Tucker Carlson needs to stop criticising the Afghan withdrawal and focus on Armenia, among other places. It is yet another ancient nation under threat.

  80. Weaver says:
    @Wizard of Oz

    Ireland was overpopulated. Famines are tough. Farming can be like gambling. I dunno the details either, but I certainly hope the English didn’t intentionally kill 1.5m. I vaguely remember something about their opting not to share food, something like that. Wikipedia suggests landlords were abusing their power. Anyway, it’s just what humanity does to “the other” at times. If you rely on potatoes and suddenly have no potatoes, that’s rough.

    • Replies: @Colin Wright
  81. Weaver says:
    @AaronB

    https://www.jta.org/2010/10/18/israel/sephardi-leader-yosef-non-jews-exist-to-serve-jews

    And the rabbi was very popular: https://www.haaretz.com/rabbi-s-funeral-draws-800-000-1.5346355

    That’s just one example. I do understand it needs to be taken in context, but there are clear delusions of superiority as a part of that religious tradition. I don’t want such a supremacist ruling over me.

    Whites have been and can be similarly deluded. I’m just giving an example.

  82. @AaronB

    ‘…I’m sure you know, that high IQ Whites are just as Left as Jews – possibly more so…’

    I see you’ve jumped on the ‘us Jews aren’t white’ bandwagon.

    It was your choice.

    ‘…This is nuts, dude. Where have you seen Jews say they will become an aristocracy (non-crazy, mainstream Jews)?’

    I believe the theory is that they are an aristocracy already — not that they will become one.

    …somewhat more than an aristocracy, really. Wouldn’t you say?

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
  83. @Wizard of Oz

    ‘My first Australian ancestor was an Irish Catholic convict but I remember hearing nothing of the Irish famine being any more Nazi style genocidal than Indian famines were. Bo doubt one might find some diary entries withv”tough love” expressions like “they’ve been breeding like rabbits now for 100 years and living on spuds so perhaps it will be for the best in the long run” but maybe you can find something to support your comparison with the Holocaust?’

    An interesting historical footnote is that indeed, the Irish famine of the 1840’s killed or forced into emigration a quarter of the population — and generated a great deal of attention, concern, and horror when it did.

    But there had been an even worse famine in the early eighteenth century. That one had killed a third of the population. It was just that in the early eighteenth century, such things were still treated as in the ordinary course of events. Floods, crop failures, hailstorms, famines…these things happen. Wot? Act?

    By the middle of the Nineteenth century, the assumption had already become ‘therefore we should do something.’

    • Replies: @Wielgus
  84. @Weaver

    ‘…but I certainly hope the English didn’t intentionally kill 1.5m’

    It was more a matter of the Liberals being in power when the famine broke out — and the Liberals being very firm in their belief that market forces should be allowed to take their course. The starving Irishmen were awful, of course, but interfering with trade would be unthinkable. So one had the surreal spectacle of grain being exported from Ireland even as the people starved. After all, the starving peasants had no money to buy it. Therefore…

    Interestingly, matters improved when the Tories came into power. Being Conservatives in the original sense of the word, they hadn’t much interest in new-fangled economic theories. People are starving — feed them. So they started in with public works projects and got some food and money going to where it was needed.

    …the moral may be that being fanatically wedded to an ideology — any ideology — is a bad thing. It will lead to you setting aside ordinary common sense in favor of your shibboleths.

    • Replies: @Weaver
  85. Weaver says:
    @Colin Wright

    Thank you. That certainly fits well into the history I’d like to believe. I posted at this website recently that an economy should serve a people, not a people their economy, and the reply was that it was a left-wing statement, hah.

    I fear the US is an economy with a subject population of workers, a military with a subject population of workers, and perhaps now a medical industry with a subject population of workers.

  86. Wielgus says:
    @Colin Wright

    Sometimes some out-group would be blamed in the past for something going wrong – witches perhaps, or Jews. But possibly a decline in religious belief also played a role by the middle of the 19th century in changing attitudes. Britain ruled a quarter of the globe by then, yet seemed unable to regulate matters right next door, on “John Bull’s Other Island”. The ultimate effect was to boost Irish nationalism.

    • Replies: @Colin Wright
  87. @Colin Wright

    My impression is that dumb or unsuccessful Jews don’t get much encouragement to feel like aristocrats.

    • Replies: @Colin Wright
  88. Weaver says:

    In general though, the goal should be how to move forward from here. We can record history such as this, so that it’s known what happened in this period, but the dream of a stable society that preserves a people should be pursued. And until such is obtained, working within this society, as positive members of the society, as a separate group within that society, should be undertaken.

    If Jews are dominant currently, the importation of Muslims on one hand, and various non-Muslim Asian groups on the other, could balance Jewish power. I expect no change to the current society could be worse than the present situation. So, we could see a bounce off a bottom, a turn towards improvement, at some point.

    [MORE]

    If I don’t see a reply, I’m just busy. But once the core truth of an historical event is found, I think it’s not worth studying further. People need to focus on the future after the useful truth is learned.

    Solzhenitsyn, whose name I finally spelled correctly on my own, wrote of a Jewish activist who, in Russia, had built bombs. Upon moving to Israel, he became an engineer and brought people water. He became a positive influence on society. Nationalism can be a positive force. Nation-states can be positive, not only negative as we think of them regarding their warring.

    Diverse states with competing elites, or diverse states with a blank amalgam ruled over by an elite that identifies as foreign, shouldn’t be expected to treat their populations well, in most cases.

  89. @Wielgus

    ‘Sometimes some out-group would be blamed in the past for something going wrong – witches perhaps, or Jews. But possibly a decline in religious belief also played a role by the middle of the 19th century in changing attitudes. ‘

    There’s also the point that the earlier you go, there simply was less to be done. In the early eighteenth century, for example, it wasn’t as easy to move a lot of food from here to there as it was a century later.

    What strikes me, though, is the shift from the earlier passivity and fatalism — famines are just something that happen, it’s not like they can be fixed — to the emerging attitude that if something is unsatisfactory, one does something about it.

    …that last being an attitude that has perhaps been taken too far. But it was beginning to emerge in the middle of the Nineteenth Century, and the response to the Irish famine is one example of that.

  90. @Wizard of Oz

    ‘…that might have reminded him that he and his parents had been lucky and that, as decent people, they should not try to deny their good fortune to others. Much the same could be said of the Jewish part in ending Jim Crow and sponsoring the NAACP. If there were, consciously or unconsciously, mixed motive what, inherently is wrong with “doing well by doing good”.?’

    It’s a pleasant explanation. The difficulty is that this Jewish altruism has never extended to the various benighted groups who have the misfortune to be white. Caring American Jews found the characters of Tobacco Road who were so hungry they stole raw turnips from each other intensely amusing — and don’t seem to have been at all moved to help them.

    This is still true today. It always has been. Perhaps Jews are only moved to help those they feel confident they will always be superior to.

    How sinister this is — and how unique to Jews it is — is another question. However, I am unconvinced that the eagerness to ‘help’ American Indians, blacks, or other groups reasonably likely to remain wards of charity no matter what measures are taken is evidence of unalloyed virtue.

  91. @Wizard of Oz

    ‘My impression is that dumb or unsuccessful Jews don’t get much encouragement to feel like aristocrats.’

    Actually, I’ve noticed the opposite, in a sense.

    The more personally successful and impressive Jews seem to stand on their own two feet; their Jewishness doesn’t come up at all, or is actually treated with depreciation.

    It is the flawed mediocrities that cling to Jewish identity and the assurance of Divinely granted superiority it purports to provide. Jewishness becomes a crutch for those who need it: the Jonathan Pollards. In support of this, I’ll note that I’ve rarely encountered a really intelligent Jew who is an ardent Zionist.

    • Replies: @Weaver
    , @Wizard of Oz
  92. @mulga mumblebrain

    I note your favourable references to socialism. I urge you to add nuance. Perhaps start by noting (without nuance) that war is the great socialist activity at least in modern times. And war is a catalogue of bungles, malice and co ver ups. Some natural monopolies may be best in state hands because politicians and bureaucrats are not up to mitigating monopoly problems by contract or regulation. When privatisation is in question I advocate considering just how well you expect politicians and bureaucrats to manage and innovate with even just one business.

  93. Weaver says:
    @Colin Wright

    That makes sense, might well hold true for nationalists in general as people who need the group. Similarly, I read an author claim heroes aren’t the sort we expect; the people willing to sacrifice themselves aren’t the all powerful He-man types, usually.

    The great damage to nationalism was when the state offered to support citizens. So, rather than rely on kin, people came to rely on the state. I don’t mean with regard to just money but security. If a king is good to you, you have less need of your nation.

    In prison, people form groups to improve their survival chances, because it’s a dangerous environment.

    This conclusion, of course, isn’t one I like, since I like nationalism. I think there’s more behind what draws a person to such things, but this is one aspect. For me, at least partly the draw is the pursuit of meaning in life (and preservation of that potential for life to have meaning), desire to be part of something, desire to live on after death through one’s children and ultimately nation. Further, the idea of an elite exploiting and degrading humanity repulses me. And I could write more…

    Are the “really intelligent Jews” even aware of the moral concerns of cosmopolitan, global societies? Similarly, are they aware of the risk of exploitation by an excessively powerful elite? Likely, they have little political education, as is the case with Americans generally. Furthermore, if a person is thriving within a system, he is more likely to support it. If a person was already an outcast, such as a Jew perceives himself to be outcast in the US, he’s less likely to be concerned about its decline.

    Such people probably shouldn’t be seen as even being Jewish, likely have very little actual religious awareness, but they do often see themselves as closer to the outgroup, on the ingroup-outgroup sliding scale.

    Someone like Stephen Miller probably has a clear awareness of what’s going on, and he acts very unusually for his identity as a result. We tend to assume people act rationally, but most likely do not of course. Miller, I suspect, is strongly attached to his identity. But he’s also educated.

    • Replies: @Colin Wright
  94. @Weaver

    ‘We tend to assume people act rationally, but most likely do not of course.’

    Sometimes, the appearance of irrational behavior is a matter of failing to appreciate the actual goal.

    For example, if in fact we sought to ‘create a secular democracy with a tilt towards Israel’ in Iraq, our behavior there after 2003 was practically nonsensical. If, on the other hand, we simply sought to fragment the Iraqi state and leave it incapable of resurrecting itself as a powerful, unified entity for the foreseeable future, our actions seem more reasonable..

    • Agree: Wielgus
    • Replies: @Weaver
    , @Wielgus
  95. Weaver says:
    @Colin Wright

    That’s a good point. Iraq does make sense if such was the goal. Saddam was certainly a threat to Israel, supported the Palestinians among other concerns of theirs.

    I don’t even believe Israel can endure for the rest of this century. It’s a waste for them to try to keep it going. Maybe the real winners are just those making money off it all.

  96. ‘I don’t even believe Israel can endure for the rest of this century. It’s a waste for them to try to keep it going. Maybe the real winners are just those making money off it all.’

    I hope to live long enough to see Palestine free from the river to the sea. My personal concern is, will I be able to say I did as much as I should have to at least offset my share in the collective sin that is American support for the Zionist entity?

    • Agree: Wielgus
    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
    , @Weaver
  97. @Colin Wright

    I have the only answer. The essential problem is that a One State solution threatens the Jewish population with being out bred and outvoted (and which rational modernisation wants to rely on the Ultra Orthodox?). So you give all Palestinians the vote but also establish a strong Upper House of the Knesset for which only those who show a net taxpaying record of 15 years can vote. There’s 100 years protection to start with. As well you invest huge some of money in creating a Singapore on Lake Galilee connected to the sea by a corridor running along the Lebanon border. Count on that removing 1.5 million Palestinians from claims to Israeli citizenship.

    • Replies: @Colin Wright
  98. @Colin Wright

    You have slightly misinterpreted my meaning. I meant that upper class Jews (that’s shorthand) don’t encourage dumb Jews to feel aristocratic. It can be quite pathetic to see the poses and miserable shuffling of dumb Jews who have stuffed up or are likely to if given half a chance. But yes,I can see how the dumb might seek superiority from their Jewishness.

  99. @Wizard of Oz

    ‘…So you give all Palestinians the vote but also establish a strong Upper House of the Knesset for which only those who show a net taxpaying record of 15 years can vote. There’s 100 years protection to start with…’

    ? Why should Jewish immigrants to Palestine have any special protection at all?

    It’s not even their country. If they feel unsafe, they can leave.

    • Replies: @Weaver
  100. Let’s get real! OK I know there would be only a 2% chance of my idea getting up even if everyone in Israel knew about it. But you have to factor in membership of the UN and the legal notion of limitation periods before you can treat your dismissal as realistic.

  101. Weaver says:
    @Colin Wright

    I used to think it could be positive, for Europeans, for Jews to have a nation-state, that it could lead to Europeans having their own states too. I’ve come to realise, it doesn’t work that way. When Trump tried to balance being pro-Israel with bringing troops home, he grew increasingly aggressive against Syria.

    In theory it could work. In practice, it doesn’t. Similarly, EuroNats have tried the same. All they get is blame for Israel’s crimes and, eventually, mass immigration from Syria, which is in Israel’s interests but not theirs.

    Also, I sympathise with the Arabs now. Christians there clearly side against Israel. There’s so much history in the region, and Israel wants it all destroyed, all memory that others lived there erased. Having ancient groups continue to exist is wonderful, even if they dislike white Europeans and Christians. It’s well that people be from somewhere, well that heritage groups exist.

    Jews need a nation-state, but they need to build one in Canada or Mexico, elsewhere anyway; and they need to do it on their own. White Europeans always seem to end up serving Jews.

    The irony is whites Gentiles are so badly off currently that some of the best resistance leaders are… Jewish. I saw a video yesterday, linked from Unz, and it was Mencius Moldbug. He recommended, of all books, Burnham’s Machiavellians! That’s a wonderful, constructive book for whites to read, much better than what most white activists read.

    To answer your other question, whites need to link up with Zoroastrians in the US, learn how they’re faring (struggle to not miscegenate). Whites need to link up with the Amish, see how they fare. (No one wants to be Amish; so, few non-whites join them.) And whites need to start families earlier. People like William Pierce I think are destructive, because he seems to have wanted to kill everyone who isn’t white, then replace whites with lab creations. I obviously have not studied Pierce, but I can’t know all things. Libertarians similarly need to be rejected in part.

    Richard Spencer clearly wants whites to get active with society, rise in power and wealth within it. If that’s possible, it sounds grand, but I’m more inclined to pursue a large family, survival strategy. Who runs the US doesn’t seem important to me. Spencer, or someone like him, should be read. But I just take a different view.

    • Agree: Colin Wright
  102. Weaver says:
    @Colin Wright

    Just to add, and this is probably the last comment I’ll make, whites in the US need a history book that can be promoted without being called racist.

    For example, 1965 could be mentioned and its significance, along with the key players, including their religion. But it needn’t otherwise be “white.” Just a history book for whites to learn what happened. I’m not half so we’ll educated as many who post here, quite possibly including yourself, but I might attempt such a book. I’d want whites to have a full understanding of political possibilities, to be prepared for the future, to then move forward.

    I have a married cousin who inherited millions, he and his sister both. I don’t think he, neither of them actually, will have kids. Millions, a great job, and he and his wife don’t seem to want kids.

    To comment on nation states, I’d never want to take another’s land as Israel is doing. I’d rather build in the tundra or under the sea, if no alternatives existed.

  103. Wielgus says:
    @Colin Wright

    An early design for a new Iraq flag was rejected precisely because its light blue and white main colour made it resemble the Israeli flag. A thin yellow line across the bottom was meant to represent the Kurds, the only ethnic group specifically referenced in the flag. It seemed designed to alienate most Iraqis.

    • Agree: Colin Wright
Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
$
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Andrew Joyce Comments via RSS
PastClassics
The Surprising Elements of Talmudic Judaism
From the Leo Frank Case to the Present Day
Analyzing the History of a Controversial Movement