The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 Thomas Dalton Archive
The Jewish Hand in the World Wars, Part 1
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>
shutterstock_785840617

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

In 2006, an inebriated Mel Gibson allegedly said this: “The Jews are responsible for all the wars in the world.” There followed the predicable storm of anti-anti-Semitism, ad hominem attacks, and various other slanders against Gibson’s character. But virtually no one asked the question: Is he right? Or rather this: To what degree could he be right?

Clearly Jews can’t be responsible for all the world’s wars, but might they have had a hand in many wars—at least amongst those countries in which they lived or interacted? Given their undeniable influence in those nations where they exceed even a fraction of a percent of the population, Jews must be responsible, to some degree, for at least some of what government does, both good and bad. Jews are often praised as brilliant managers, economists, and strategists, and have been granted seemingly endless awards and honors. But those given credit for their successes must also receive blame for their failures. And there are few greater failures in the lives of nations than war.

To begin to evaluate Gibson’s charge, I will look at the role Jews played in the two major wars of world history, World Wars I and II. But first I need to recap some relevant history in order to better understand the context of Jewish policy and actions during those calamitous events.

Historical Context

Have Jews played a disproportionate role in war and social conflict—a role typically not of peacemakers and reconcilers, but of instigators and profiteers? Let us very briefly review some historical evidence to answer this charge; it provides relevant insight into Jewish influences during both world wars.

As far back as the Book of Genesis, we find stories such as that of Joseph, son of Jacob, sold into slavery in Egypt. Joseph earns the favor of the Pharaoh and is elevated to a position of power. When a famine strikes, Joseph develops and implements a brutal policy of exploitation, leading Egyptian farmers to sell their land, animals, and ultimately themselves in exchange for food. Joseph himself survives unscathed, living out his days in “the land of Goshen,” with a life of luxury and ease—evidently as repayment for a job well done.[1]It is clear that Joseph was Jewish: His father, Jacob, was renamed by God as “Israel” (Gen 35:10), and Joseph himself is repeatedly referred to as a “Hebrew” (e.g. Gen 39:14, 41:12).

Over time, Jews continued to build a reputation as rabble-rousers and exploiters. In 41 AD, Roman Emperor Claudius issued his Third Edict, condemning the Jews of Alexandria for abuse of privilege and sowing discord; he charged them with “fomenting a general plague which infests the whole world.” Eight years later he expelled them from Rome. As a result, the Jews revolted in Jerusalem in the years 66-70, and again in 115 and 132. Of that final uprising, Cassius Dio made the following observation—the first clear indication of Jews causing a major war:

Jews everywhere were showing signs of hostility to the Romans, partly by secret and partly overt acts… [M]any other nations, too, were joining them through eagerness for gain, and the whole earth, one might almost say, was being stirred up over the matter.[2]Roman History, 69.13.

Thus it was not without reason that notable Romans denounced the Jews—among these Seneca (“an accursed race”), Quintilian (“a race which is a curse to others”), and Tacitus (a “disease,” a “pernicious superstition,” and “the basest of peoples”).[3]For Seneca’s and Quintilian’s comments, see Stern (1974), pages 431 and 513. For Tacitus, see his Annals (XV, 44), and Histories (5.8). Prominent German historian Theodor Mommsen reaffirmed this view, noting that the Jews of Rome were indeed agents of social disruption and decay: “Also in the ancient world, Judaism was an effective ferment of cosmopolitanism and of national decomposition.”[4]History of Rome, vol. 4, p. 643.

Throughout the Middle Ages and into the Renaissance, their negative reputation persisted. John Chrysostom, Thomas Aquinas, and Martin Luther all condemned Jewish usury—a lending practice often trading on distress, and a frequent cause of social unrest. In the 1770s, Baron d’Holbach declared that “the Jewish people distinguished themselves only by massacres, unjust wars, cruelties, usurpations, and infamies.” He added that they “lived continually in the midst of calamities, and were, more than all other nations, the sport of frightful revolutions.”[5]Ecce Homo! (1770/1813: 26, 28) Voltaire was struck by the danger posed to humanity by the Hebrew tribe; “I would not be in the least bit surprised if these people would not some day become deadly to the human race.”[6]Cited in Hertzberg (1968: 300). Kant called them a “nation of deceivers,” and Hegel remarked that “the only act Moses reserved for the Israelites was…to borrow with deceit and repay confidence with theft.”[7]For Kant, see his Conflict of the Faculties (1798/1979: 101). Hegel’s quotation is from his Early Theological Writings (1975: 190).

Thus both empirical evidence and learned opinion suggest that Jews have, for centuries, had a hand in war, social strife, and economic distress, and have managed to profit thereby.[8]This is just a fraction of the negative observations of Jews over the centuries. For a more complete study, see my series Dalton (2011a, 2011b, 2011c, and 2012). Being a small and formally disempowered minority everywhere, it is striking that they should merit even a mention in such events—or if they did, it should have been as the exploited, and not the exploiters. And yet they seem to have demonstrated a consistent ability to turn social unrest to their advantage. Thus it is not an unreasonable claim that they might even instigate such unrest, anticipating that they could achieve desired ends.

Jewish Advance in America and Elsewhere

The long history of Jewish involvement in social conflict has a direct bearing on both world wars. Consider their progressive influence in American government. Beginning in the mid-1800s, we find a number of important milestones. In 1845, the first Jews were elected to both houses of Congress: Lewis Levin (Pa.) to the House and David Yulee (Fla.) to the Senate. By 1887 they had their first elected governor, Washington Bartlett in California. And in 1889, Solomon Hirsch became the first Jewish minister, nominated by President Harrison as ambassador to the Ottoman Empire—which at that time controlled Palestine.

Overseas, trouble was brewing for the Jews in Russia. A gang of anarchists, one or two of whom were Jewish, succeeded in killing Czar Alexander II in 1881. This unleashed a multi-decade series of periodic pogroms, most minor but some killing multiple hundreds of Jews. Further difficulties for them came with the so-called May Laws of 1882, which placed restrictions on Jewish business practice and areas of residency within the “Pale of Settlement” in the western portion of the Russian empire.[9]A large area, comprising much of present-day Poland, Lithuania, Ukraine, and Belarus. Many Jews fled the Pale; of those heading west, Germany was their first stop.[10]In 1891 the New York Times ran the headline: “Russia’s Fierce Assault: Europe amazed at her treatment of Jews.” As the article explained, “Berlin…is overwhelmed by the advance wave of the flying Jews, driven on a day’s notice from their homes and swarming westward…” (May 31; p. 1).

Even prior to the 1880s, Jewish influence in Germany was considerable. In the 1840s, both Bruno Bauer and Karl Marx wrote influential essays on Die Judenfrage (The Jewish Question). In 1850, composer Richard Wagner complained that Germans found themselves “in the position of fighting for emancipation from the Jews. The Jew is, in fact…more than emancipated. He rules…”[11]Cited in Rather (1990: 163). By 1878, Wagner declared that Jewish control of German newspapers was nearly total. A year later Wilhelm Marr decried “the victory of Jewry over Germandom”; he believed it self-evident that “without striking a blow…Jewry today has become the socio-political dictator of Germany.”[12]Cited in Levy (1991: 83-84).

The facts support these views. And with the influx of Russian and Polish Jews in the late 1800s and early 1900s, the situation got demonstrably worse. Sarah Gordon (1984: 10-14) cites the following impressive statistics:

Before the First World War, for example, Jews occupied 13 percent of the directorships of joint-stock corporations and 24 percent of the supervisory positions within these corporations. … [D]uring 1904 they comprised 27 percent of all lawyers, 10 percent of all apprenticed lawyers, 5 percent of court clerks, 4 percent of magistrates, and up to 30 percent of all higher ranks of the judiciary. … Jews were [also] overrepresented among university professors and students between 1870 and 1933. For example, in 1909-1910…almost 12 percent of instructors at German universities were Jewish… [I]n 1905-1906 Jewish students comprised 25 percent of the law and medical students… The percentage of Jewish doctors was also quite high, especially in large cities, where they sometimes were a majority. … [I]n Berlin around 1890, 25 percent of all children attending grammar school were Jewish…

For all this, Jews never exceeded 2% of the German population. The public accepted the foreigners with a remarkable degree of tolerance, and more or less allowed them to dominate certain sectors of German society. There were no legal constraints, and violent attacks were rare. But the Germans would come to regret such liberal policies.

The other important factor at that time was the emergence of Zionism. Formally established by Theodor Herzl in 1897, its basic principles were laid out in his book Der Judenstaat (The Jewish State). He argued that the Jews would never be free from persecution as long as they were foreigners everywhere, and thus they needed their own state. A number of locations were discussed, but by the time of the first meeting of the World Zionist Organization in 1897, the movement had settled on Palestine. This, however, was problematic because the region at that time was under control of the Ottoman Empire, and was populated primarily by Muslim and Christian Arabs. Somehow, the Zionist Jews would have to wrest control of Palestine away from the Ottoman Turks and then drive out the Arabs. It was a seemingly impossible task.

They immediately understood that this could only be done by force. It would take a condition of global distress—something approaching a world war—in order for the Zionists to manipulate things to their advantage. Their guiding principle of ‘profit through distress’ could work here, but it would require both internal and external pressure. In states where the Jews had significant population but little official power, they would foment unrest from within. In states where they had influence, they would use the power of their accumulated wealth to dictate national policy. And in states where they had neither population nor influence, they would apply external pressure to secure support for their purposes.

That the Zionists seriously contemplated this two-pronged, internal/external strategy is no mere speculation; we have the word of Herzl himself. He wrote:

When we sink, we become a revolutionary proletariat, the subordinate officers of the revolutionary party; when we rise, there rises also our terrible power of the purse. (1896/1967: 26)

In fact, Herzl apparently predicted the outbreak of global war. One of the original Zionists, Litman Rosenthal, wrote in his diary of 15 December 1914 his recollection of a conversation with Herzl from 1897. Herzl allegedly said,

It may be that Turkey will refuse or be unable to understand us. This will not discourage us. We will seek other means to accomplish our end. The Orient question is now the question of the day. Sooner or later it will bring about a conflict among the nations. A European war is imminent… The great European war must come. With my watch in hand do I await this terrible moment. After the great European war is ended the Peace Conference will assemble. We must be ready for that time. We will assuredly be called to this great conference of the nations and we must prove to them the urgent importance of a Zionist solution to the Jewish Question.

This was Herzl’s so-called “great war prophecy.” Now, he does not say that the Zionists will cause this war, only that they will “be ready” when it comes, and “will seek other means” than diplomacy to accomplish their end. A striking prediction, if true.[13]There are a few problems, however. First, the diary is dated some five months after the war actually started; it’s easy to recall a prediction after the fact. Second, Rosenthal’s book My Siberian Diary is nowhere to be found. The entry is recounted in an obscure periodical, The Jewish Era, dated January 1919 (p. 128); this was not only after the war was over, but after the Peace Conference had already begun.

In any case, there was clearly a larger plan at work here. The Jews would pursue a policy of revolution in states like Russia in order to bring down hated governments. To the degree possible, they would seek to undermine the Ottoman Turks as well. And in Germany, the UK, and America, they would use “the terrible power of the purse” to dictate an aggressive war-policy in order to realign the global power structure to their favor. This would have a triple benefit: curtailing rampant anti-Semitism; enhancing Jewish wealth; and ultimately establishing a Jewish state in Palestine, one that could serve as the global center of world Jewry. Revolution and war thus became a top priority.[14]This was true of both Zionist and non-Zionist Jews. It’s worth noting that Zionism was a minority view among American Jews, at least for the first two decades of its existence. Many Jews, being ‘internationalists,’ did not feel the need for a Jewish homeland. And many realized that, should this come to pass, they would be charged with dual loyalty. But with the Zionists’ relentless pressure and record of success, they became the dominant view.

Turkey was in fact an early success for the movement. The Sultan’s system of autocratic rule generated some dissatisfaction, and a group of Turkish Jews exploited this to their advantage—resulting in the Turkish Revolution of 1908. As Stein explains,

the revolution had been organized from Salonica [present-day Thessaloniki], where the Jews, together with the crypto-Jews known as Dönmeh, formed a majority of the population. Salonica Jews and the Dönmeh had taken an important part in the events associated with the revolution and had provided the Committee of Union and Progress with several of its ablest members. (1961: 35)[15]For a contemporaneous account, see the London Times, 11 July 1911, p. 5.

This group of revolutionaries, today known as the Young Turks, was able to overthrow the Sultan and exert substantial influence on the succeeding ruler. But in the end they were unable to steer the declining empire in a pro-Zionist direction.

Back in the USA, Jewish population was rising even faster than in Germany. In 1880 it had roughly 250,000 Jews (0.5%), but by 1900—just 20 years later—the figure was around 1.5 million (1.9%). A census of 1918 showed this number increasing to an astonishing figure of 3 million (2.9%). Their political influence grew commensurately.

For present purposes, significant American influence began with the assassination of President William McKinley in 1901. He was shot by a Polish radical named Leon Czolgosz, who had been heavily influenced by two Jewish anarchists, Emma Goldman and Alexander Berkman. The presidency immediately fell to the vice president, Theodore Roosevelt—who, at age 42, was (and remains) the youngest president in history. His role as an army colonel in the 1898 victory in Cuba over the Spaniards had led to widespread publicity, and with the backing of the Jewish community, he won the New York governorship later that same year. Thus he was well situated to earn the vice presidential nomination in 1900.

A question of interest: Was Roosevelt Jewish? I will examine this issue in detail later with respect to FDR (as to whom there is more to say), but in brief, there is considerable circumstantial evidence that all of the Roosevelts were, at least in part, Jewish. In Theodore’s case, the only explicit indication is a claim by former Michigan governor Chase Osborn. In a letter dated 21 March 1935, Osborn said, “President [Franklin] Roosevelt knows well enough that his ancestors were Jewish. I heard Theodore Roosevelt state twice that his ancestors were Jewish.”[16]Cited in Slomovitz (1981: 6-7). But Osborn offers no specifics, and I am not aware of any further claims regarding Theodore himself.

However, there are two other relevant items regarding his Jewish connections. Having acceded to the office in 1901, he subsequently won the 1904 election. In late 1906 he appointed the first Jew to the presidential cabinet: Oscar Straus, a wealthy New York lawyer and former ambassador to the Ottoman Empire. As Secretary of Labor and Commerce, Straus was in charge of the Bureau of Immigration—at the critical time of accelerating Jewish immigration. We can be sure that his office was particularly amenable to incoming Jews.

The second event occurred in 1912. Roosevelt had declined to run again in 1908, preferring to nominate his Secretary of War, William Taft—who proceeded to win handily. Taft, however, disappointed many Republicans, and there was a call to bring Roosevelt back. But the party would not oust a sitting president, and so Roosevelt decided to run on a third-party ticket. Hence the peculiar status of the 1912 election: it featured Taft running for reelection, Roosevelt running as a third-party candidate, and Woodrow Wilson running as a first-term Democrat. As the history books like to say, we had a former president and a sitting president running against a future president. Wilson, as we know, would win this race, and go on to serve two consecutive terms—covering the lead-up, duration, and aftermath of World War I.

Jewish banker Paul Warburg (1868-1932) at the 1st Pan-American Financial Conference, Washington D.C., May, 1915. By Harris & Ewing [Public domain], via Wikimedia Commons
Jewish banker Paul Warburg (1868-1932) at the 1st Pan-American Financial Conference, Washington D.C., May, 1915. By Harris & Ewing [Public domain], via Wikimedia Commons

But less well known is this fact: For perhaps the first time in US history, all three major candidates had substantial Jewish financial backing. Henry Ford’s Dearborn Independentreported on a 1914 Congressional testimony by Paul Warburg, best known as the Jewish “father of the Federal Reserve.” Warburg was the prototypical Jewish banker, long-time partner at Kuhn, Loeb, and Co., and later head of Wells Fargo in New York. At some point during Taft’s presidency, Warburg decided to get financially involved in politics. By the time of the 1912 election, he and his partners at Kuhn, Loeb were funding all three candidates. Warburg’s testimony, before Senator Joseph Bristow (R-Kan.), is revealing:

JB: “It has been variously reported in the newspapers that you and your partners directly and indirectly contributed very largely to Mr. Wilson’s campaign funds.” PW: “Well, my partners—there is a very peculiar condition—no; I do not think any one of them contributed largely at all; there may have been moderate contributions. My brother, for instance, contributed to Mr. Taft’s campaign.” …

JB: “I understood you to say that you contributed to Mr. Wilson’s campaign.” PW: “No; my letter says that I offered to contribute; but it was too late. I came back to this country only a few days before the campaign closed.” JB: “So that you did not make any contribution?” PW: “I did not make any contribution; no.” JB: “Did any members of your firm make contributions to Mr. Wilson’s campaign?” PW: “I think that is a matter of record. Mr. [Jacob] Schiff contributed. I would not otherwise discuss the contributions of my partners, if it was not a matter of record. I think Mr. Schiff was the only one who contributed in our firm.” JB: “And you stated that your brother had contributed to Mr. Taft’s campaign, as I understand it?” PW: “I did. But again, I do not want to go into a discussion of my partners’ affairs, and I shall stick to that pretty strictly, or we will never get through.” JB: “I understood you also to say that no members of your firm contributed to Mr. Roosevelt’s campaign.” PW: “I did not say that.” JB: “Oh! Did any members of the firm do that?” PW: “My answer would please you probably; but I shall not answer that, but will repeat that I will not discuss my partners’ affairs.” JB: “Yes. I understood you to say Saturday that you were a Republican, but when Mr. Roosevelt became a candidate, you then became a sympathizer with Mr. Wilson and supported him?” PW: “Yes.” JB: “While your brother was supporting Mr. Taft?” PW: “Yes.” JB: “And I was interested to know whether any member of your firm supported Mr. Roosevelt.” PW: “It is a matter of record that there are.” JB: “That there are some of them who did?” PW: “Oh, yes.”[17]Cited in Dearborn Independent (25 June 1921).

In sum: some unknown members of Kuhn, Loeb donated to Roosevelt; Paul’s brother (Felix) gave to Taft; and Schiff donated to Wilson. Cleverly, Paul Warburg himself admitted to no funding, but we can hardly take him at his word here. In any case, there was a Jewish hand in all three contestants, and the Jews were guaranteed influence with the winner, no matter the outcome. We don’t know the extent of this influence, nor how long it had gone on. To date I have not uncovered evidence of Jewish involvement with Roosevelt’s 1904 election, although his appointment of Straus to the cabinet is typical of the kind of political patronage that follows financial support. And the same with Taft: We don’t know the degree of Jewish support for his initial run in 1908, but support in 1912 suggests that they were reasonably satisfied with his performance.

But Taft turned out to be a mixed bag for the Jews. On the one hand, Jewish immigration continued apace. And he did appoint Oscar Straus to the ambassadorship to the Ottoman Empire . However, he was less inclined to act on the international stage than the Jews had wished. Of particular concern was the growing problem in Russia, and steady reports of Jewish pogroms. For example, there was the “Kishinev massacre” of April 1903; the New York Times reported that “Jews were slaughtered like sheep. The dead number 120… The scenes of horror attending this massacre are beyond description. Babes were literally torn to pieces by the frenzied and blood-thirsty mob” (April 28; p. 6). A slight exaggeration—the actual death toll was 47. A second attack in Kishinev in 1905 left 19 dead; regrettable, but hardly a catastrophe. In early 1910 the NYT ran an article, “Russian Jews in Sad Plight.” Their source said, “The condition of Russian [Jews] is worse today than at any time since the barbarous massacres and pogroms of 1905 and 1906.”[18]April 11, p. 18. The same article goes on to decry “the systematic, relentless quiet grinding down of a people of more than 6,000,000 souls.” This figure surely strikes a chord—but that’s another story. Then on 18 September 1911, the Russian Prime Minister, Pyotr Stolypin, was shot and killed—by a Jewish assassin, Mordekhai Gershkovich, aka Dmitri Bogrov. (The reader will recall Herzl’s demand for revolutionary action.) This of course brought even harsher recriminations.

But the last straw, for the American Zionists, was the restriction on American Jews from entering into Russia. There had been obstacles in place since the turn of the century, but they became much more stringent during Taft’s presidency. The Zionists wanted the US government to take action, but this was forestalled by a long-standing treaty of 1832, one that guaranteed “reciprocal liberty of commerce and navigation” and allowed mutual freedom of entry of citizens on both sides. The Zionists thus took it upon themselves to initiate the abrogation of this treaty as a means of putting external pressure on the Czarist regime. And, despite the wishes of President Taft and the best interests of America at large, they succeeded. This whole incident, thoroughly documented by Cohen (1963), is an astounding and watershed event in Jewish influence. As she says,

Credit for this act belongs to a small group which had campaigned publicly during 1911 for the abrogation of the treaty. How a mere handful of men succeeded in arousing American public opinion on a relatively obscure issue to a near “wave of hysteria,” how they forced the hand of an antagonistic administration, and what principal aim lay behind their fight for abrogation constitute an absorbing story of pressure politics. (p. 3)

The “mere handful of men” consisted primarily of Jewish lawyer Louis Marshall, the banker Jacob Schiff, and their colleagues at the American Jewish Committee—the ‘AIPAC’ of its day, and still a potent force a century later. They had raised the topic of abrogation as early as 1908, but it did not become a top priority until early 1910. They then approached Taft, knowing that he was preparing to run for reelection the following year. As Cohen (p. 9) says, “The quid pro quo was obvious; the Jewish leaders would try to deliver the Jewish vote to Taft.” But he was unsympathetic. Taft knew that, for several reasons, it was not in America’s favor: Our commercial interests, our Far East foreign policy, Russian good will, and our international integrity would all be harmed by abrogation. But the Jews were pressing; in February 1910 they met with Taft, to “give him one last chance” to support their cause. When he again declined, they decided to go around the president, to Congress and to the American people. They knew how to work Congress. As Cohen (p. 13) explains, “the pattern of Jewish petitions to the government…was generally that of secret diplomacy. Wealthy or politically prominent individuals asked favors…but always in the form of discreet pressure and behind-the-scenes bargaining.” But mounting a public campaign was something new.

In January 1911, Marshall “officially opened the public campaign for abrogation.” He immediately appealed not to Jewish interest—though that was the sole motive—but rather to allegedly American interests. “It is not the Jew who is insulted; it is the American people,” he said. As Shogan (2010: 22) puts it, “a key to the [Jewish] strategy was to frame its demand as a plea to protect American interests in general, not just the rights of Jews.” The AJC then embarked on a massive propaganda effort. They enlisted Jewish support in the media; Samuel Strauss and Adolph Ochs (of the New York Times) helped coordinate a series of articles and op-eds in several major cities. They made the case “in popular emotional terms,” organized petitions and letter-writing programs, and held dedicated, pro-abrogation rallies—one of which included such luminaries as William Hearst and future president Woodrow Wilson.[19]Indeed—a “special effort” was made to get the support of Wilson, “whose influence was rising within the Democratic ranks” (p. 32). Everything was designed to put maximum pressure on Congress to act.

All the while, Taft remained firm in his opposition. In a private letter he wrote, “I am the President of the whole United States, and the vote of the Jews, important as it is, cannot frighten me in this matter” (Cohen, p. 21). Secretary of State Philander Knox, and Ambassador to Russia William Rockhill, both strongly supported him. Rockhill was particularly galled; expressing his thoughts, Cohen asks, “were national interests to be subservient to a small group of individuals?” After all, the actual harm was near microscopic: “Only 28 American Jews resided in Russia, and the State Dept knew of only four cases in five years where American Jews were denied admission” (p. 16). And yet this “small group of men” was turning the tide in their favor.

By November of 1911, just 11 months after launching their public campaign, the AJC was confident of victory. Schiff was able to predict easy passage for the resolution. That same month an “unofficial delegation” of Jews met with Taft regarding his pending annual message, and they convinced him that Congressional action was inevitable, and veto-proof. Taft relented, agreeing to sign the resolution when it reached his desk. Wanting no further delay, the AJC pressed for a vote before the end of year. On December 13 the House approved the measure—by the astounding tally of 301 to 1. A slightly modified version came up for Senate vote on December 19, which was passed unanimously. A reconciled bill was approved the next day, and Taft signed it. So it came to be that, on 20 December 1911, the US government sold its soul to the Jewish Lobby.

The importance of this event can scarcely be overestimated. The interests of “a mere handful of men,” acting on behalf of a small American minority, were able to dictate governmental foreign policy, against the express wishes of the president and his staff, and contrary to the larger interests of the nation.

The Russians, incidentally, were stunned at this decision. They knew of the Jewish hand behind it, but could hardly believe that it had the power to carry through on its threat. The NYT again gives a useful report:

In parliamentary circles here [in Russia] the prevailing comment is characterized by astonishment that the American government has responded so readily to the Jewish outcry. The opinion is expressed by members of the Duma that in all probability the Jews will now attempt to force matters further. (20 Dec 1911; p. 2)

Indeed—the Jewish-led Bolshevik revolution was just six years away.

Such was the state of things in America and globally at that time. International Jewry had sufficient wealth and influence to steer events at the highest levels, and American Jews (Zionist and otherwise) had come to permeate the government—and American culture generally. The situation so impressed German economist Werner Sombart that in 1911 he made this observation: “For what we call Americanism is nothing else than the Jewish spirit distilled.”[20]The Jews and Modern Capitalism (1911/1982), p. 44.From the perspective of a century later, this would seem truer than ever.

Wilson and the “Great War”

All this, then, serves as the context and backdrop for the emergence of Woodrow Wilson, beginning with the election of 1912. If Franklin Roosevelt was “the first great hero of American Jews,”[21]Shogan (2010: xi). then Wilson was the first great understudy. As Henry Ford saw it, “Mr. Wilson, while President, was very close to the Jews. His administration, as everyone knows, was predominantly Jewish.”[22]Dearborn Independent, 11 June 1921. The entire ‘international Jew’ series ran without a byline, and so for the sake of convenience I attribute them to Ford—even though it is virtually certain that he did not write the pieces himself. Wilson seems to have been the first president to have the full backing of the Jewish Lobby, including multiple major financial donors. And he was the first to fully reward their support.

It’s worthwhile summarizing the main figures in the Jewish power structure, as of 1912. Herzl died young in 1904, so he was out of the picture. But a “mere handful” of others came to dominate the movement, and the American scene:

  • Oscar Straus (age 62), German-born, first Jewish cabinet member under T. Roosevelt, and later ambassador to the Ottoman Empire under Taft.
  • Jacob Schiff (65), head of the Kuhn, Loeb banking firm.
  • Louis Marshall (56), borderline Zionist, founder of the AJC.
  • The Warburg brothers: Paul (44) and Felix (41), German-born bankers. A third brother, Max, stayed in Germany (until 1938).
  • Henry Morgenthau, Sr. (56), German-born lawyer, father of the even more influential Henry, Jr.
  • Louis Brandeis (56), lawyer, strongly Zionist.
  • Samuel Untermyer (54), lawyer.
  • Bernard Baruch (42), Wall Street financier.
  • Stephen Wise (40), Austrian-born rabbi and fervent Zionist.
  • Richard Gottheil (50), British-born rabbi and Zionist.

These, to emphasize, were all Americans. On the European side there was a different structure, one centered on such figures as Chaim Weizmann and Herbert Samuel in Britain, and Max Nordau in France.

Let me begin with financial backing—which of course has long been the trump card of Jewry. Many of the above individuals were prime supporters of Wilson. Cooper (2009: 172) remarks that his “big contributors” included the likes of “Henry Morgenthau, Jacob Schiff, and Samuel Untermyer, as well as a newcomer to their ranks, Bernard Baruch.” Such assistance continued throughout Wilson’s tenure; for his 1916 reelection bid, “financiers such as Henry Morgenthau and Bernard Baruch gave generously” (ibid: 350). As we saw, Schiff’s support was admitted by Warburg in his congressional testimony.

Warburg himself was very evasive, allowing only that his “sympathies went with Mr. Wilson.” Yet we can hardly believe that no money followed. Warburg’s most profound impact was his leading role in the creation of the Federal Reserve in 1913, the year Wilson took office. Seligman (1914: 387) remarks that “it may be stated without fear of contradiction that in its fundamental features the Federal Reserve is the work of Mr. Warburg more than of any other man in the country.” Its basic principles, he said, “were the creation of Mr. Warburg and of Mr. Warburg alone.” In due recognition, Wilson appointed him to the Fed’s first Board of Governors in August 1914.

Morgenthau’s influence began in 1911, when Wilson was still governor of New Jersey. Balakian (2003: 220) notes that it was at this time that the two “bonded,” and that “Morgenthau offered Wilson his ‘unreserved moral and financial support’.” In the run-up to the 1912 Democratic convention, “Morgenthau was giving $5,000 a month to the campaign, and continued to give generously throughout the fall” (ibid.: 221). In fact, says Balakian, only a few of his wealthy Princeton classmates gave more. Ward (1989: 252) confirms this, noting that Morgenthau “had been an important backer of Woodrow Wilson in 1912.” Morgenthau duly received his reward: ambassadorship to Ottoman Turkey, again overseeing Palestine.

Of special importance was Wilson’s association with Louis Brandeis. The two first met back in 1910; Shogan (2010: 64) describes Brandeis’s “friendship with Woodrow Wilson,” noting that he had “worked mightily” for him in the 1912 campaign. In a telling statement, Wilson wrote to his friend after the election, “You were yourself a great part of the victory.”[23]Cooper (1983: 194). Brandeis would be rewarded by a successful nomination to the Supreme Court in June 1916—the first Jew on the court. He would serve a full 23 years, well beyond Wilson’s lifetime, and, despite his formal ‘neutrality’ as a justice, would play a vital role in both world wars.

But perhaps the most significant of all was Bernard Baruch. A millionaire before he was 30, Baruch catapulted out of nowhere, under obscure conditions, to become a leading influence in the Wilson administration. Already in 1915, in the early years of the European war, he was convinced that America would be involved. In Congressional testimony of February 1920, Baruch stated that, in 1915, he “had been very much disturbed by the unprepared condition of this country.” “I had been thinking about it very seriously, and I thought we would be drawn into the war. … I thought a war was coming long before it did.” Through some still-mysterious process, Baruch was named to the Council of National Defense in early 1916. He then came to control a particular subcommittee, the War Industries Board (WIB), which had extraordinary wartime powers. Baruch single-handedly ran it throughout the war years. His testimony before Sen. Albert Jefferis (R-Neb.) summarizes his role:

AJ: “In what lines did this board of 10 have the powers that you mention? BB: “We had the power of priority, which was the greatest power in the war.” AJ: “In other words, you determined what everybody could have?” BB: “Exactly; there is no question about that. I assumed that responsibility, sir, and that final determination rested within me.” AJ: “What?” BB: “That final determination, as the President said, rested within me; the determination of whether the Army or Navy should have it rested with me; the determination of whether the Railroad Administration could have it, or the Allies, or whether General Allenby should have locomotives, or whether they should be used in Russia, or used in France.” AJ: “You had considerable power?” BB: “Indeed I did, sir.” …

AJ: “And all those different lines, really, ultimately, centered in you, so far as power was concerned?” BB: “Yes, sir, it did. I probably had more power than perhaps any other man did in the war; doubtless that is true.”[24]War Expenditures: Parts 1 to 13. US Government Printing Office (1921: 1814, 1816).

An astonishing fact: a young, unelected Jew with no political experience becomes, in time of crisis, the most powerful man in the US government, after the president himself. And yet all this was just a rehearsal. Baruch would play a similar role in the Second World War under FDR, in his Office of War Mobilization. He was also a friend and confidant of Winston Churchill. No doubt “Barney” Baruch had lots of advice for all parties involved.

World War I began in earnest in August of 1914, when the German army crossed into officially neutral Belgium on its way to France. A series of alliances and treaties triggered a chain reaction in which 10 nations entered the war by the end of that year. Ultimately another 18 would be engaged—though in the case of the US, it would be nearly two and half years later. It’s difficult today, with our present eagerness to engage in warfare around the world, to understand the degree to which Americans then were so strongly anti-interventionist. Neither the public nor the government had any real inclination to get involved in a European war. Publicly, at least, Wilson himself was a pacifist and an isolationist. In a speech of 19 August 1914, just after the outbreak of war, he proclaimed that “every man who really loves America will act and speak in the true spirit of neutrality, which is the spirit of impartiality and fairness and friendliness to all concerned.” We have a duty to be “the one great nation at peace,” and thus “we must be impartial in thought as well as in action.”[25]Cited in Chalberg (1995: 46-47).

And yet, American governmental policy did not fully adhere to these lofty words. Under international law, the United States, as a neutral party, had the right to conduct commerce with all sides. But of course both Britain and Germany sought to restrict trade with the other. A British naval blockade interrupted or seized a substantial portion of our intended shipments to Germany, reducing trade by more than 90%. And yet Wilson hardly objected. On the other hand, when German submarines attacked or threatened our shipments to England, he reacted in the strongest manner. The end result was a near quadrupling of trade with the Allies between 1914 and 1916. In practical terms, we were supporting the Allied war effort, even as we remained officially neutral. Wilson’s government—if not he himself—was decidedly biased against the Germans. Not coincidentally, Wilson’s Jewish advisors were, to a man, anti-German.

By the time of the 1916 election, war was churning throughout Europe. Still, Wilson promised to remain unengaged; he ran and won on the slogan, “He kept us out of war.” The American people too had little appetite for armed conflict; as Cooper (2009: 381) writes, “Clearly, the president was not feeling a push for war from Congress or the public.” But like so many campaign promises, this one would be discarded soon afterward—in fact, barely one month after his second inauguration.

So: Why did he do it? Why did Wilson change his mind and, on 2 April 1917, issue his famous call to Congress to declare war on Germany? His official answer: German submarines were relentlessly targeting US military, passenger, and cargo ships, and thus we simply had no choice. But this explanation does not withstand scrutiny. Early in the war the Germans were sinking a number of ships that were trafficking with the Allies, but in September 1915, after urgent demands from Wilson, they suspended submarine attacks. This suspension held for an exceptionally long time—through February 1917. And all throughout that time, we, and other “neutral” nations, were trading with Germany’s enemies, supplying them with material goods, and assisting in a naval blockade. Thus it is unsurprising that the Germans eventually resumed their attacks, on all ships in the war zone.

In his famous speech to Congress, Wilson said of the lifting of the suspension, “the Imperial German Government…put aside all restraints of law or of humanity, and uses its submarines to sink every vessel [in the war zone].” Sparing no hyperbole, he added, “The present German submarine warfare against commerce is a warfare against mankind. It is a war against all nations.”

But what are the facts? Specifically, how big a threat did Germany pose to the US? In reality, it was not much of a threat at all. From the time of the outbreak of war (August 1914) until Wilson’s declaration in April 1917, a total of three small military ships were lost—one submarine in 1915, one armored cruiser in 1916, and one protected cruiser in early 1917. Additionally, a total of 12 American merchant steamers (freight ships) were sunk in the same period, but with the loss of only 38 individual lives.[26]Other Americans died on foreign-flagged ships—most notoriously, 128 on the Lusitania. But this still pales in comparison to the thousands who would die in a war. So the US had lost a grand total of 15 ships to that point. Putting this in perspective: Over the course of the entire war, German U-boats sank roughly 6,600 ships in total. Hence the threat to the US was all but inconsequential. Clearly Wilson was thinking in internationalist terms, and someone or something convinced him that realigning the global order was more important than American public opinion; thus his famous and much-derided phrase: “The world must be made safe for democracy.” Yes—but whose democracy?

A few powerful voices opposed Wilson, including Senators Robert La Follette (R-Wisc.) and George Norris (R-Neb.). Both spoke on April 4, just two days after Wilson’s plea for war. La Follette was outraged at the unilateral action taken by the Wilson administration. In a scathing speech, he said:

I am speaking of a profession of democracy that is linked in action with the most brutal and domineering use of autocratic power. Are the people of this country being so well-represented in this war movement that we need to go abroad to give other people control of their governments? Will the President and the supporters of this war bill submit it to a vote of the people before the declaration of war goes into effect? … Who has registered the knowledge or approval of the American people of the course this Congress is called upon to take in declaring war upon Germany? Submit the question to the people, you who support it. You who support it dare not do it, for you know that by a vote of more than ten to one the American people as a body would register their declaration against it.[27]Online at: www.historymatters.gmu.edu. I am not aware of any polling data supporting his claim that 90% of Americans were opposed to entering the war, but it seems to have been a reasonable estimate.

Norris had some ideas about the driving forces behind the call to war. He believed that many Americans had been “misled as to the real history and the true facts, by the almost unanimous demand of the great combination of wealth that has a direct financial interest in our participation in the war.”[28]Cited in Chalberg (1995: 71-73). Wall Street bankers loaned millions to the Allies, and naturally wanted it repaid. And then there were the profits to be made from military hardware and ammunition. These same forces also held sway in the media:

 [A] large number of the great newspapers and news agencies of the country have been controlled and enlisted in the greatest propaganda that the world has ever known, to manufacture sentiment in favor of war. … [And now] Congress, urged by the President and backed by the artificial sentiment, is about to declare war and engulf our country in the greatest holocaust that the world has ever known…

Indeed—every war is a ‘holocaust.’ Norris then encapsulated his view with a most striking line: “We are going into war upon the command of gold.” And everyone knew who held the gold.

Norris and La Follette both realized they had no chance to change the outcome. Any force that could compel abrogation of the Russian treaty and monopolize a presidential election could manufacture Congressional consent for war. Later that same day, the Senate confirmed it, by a vote of 82 to 6. Two days thereafter, the House concurred, 373 to 50. And so we were at war. American troops would be on the ground in Europe within three months.

Balfour

Political power is a strange thing; it is one of those rare cases where appearance is reality. If you say you have power, and others say you have power, and if all parties act as if you have power—then you have power. Such is the case with the Jewish Lobby. Simply because, at that time, they had no army, had internal disagreements, and in no country exceeded one or two percent of the population, we cannot conclude that they were mere helpless pawns, manipulated at will by the great powers. And yet today, modern commentators continue to refer to the ‘illusory’ or ‘misperceived’ power of the Jews at that time.[29]Schneer (2010: 153) is typical: there was “no such thing” as a powerful Jewish force in world affairs. Any thoughts to the contrary are “based upon a misconception.” Hodgson (2006: 154-155) is another example: “the influence of Zionism [was] considerably exaggerated” by the British government, who believed the international Jews to be “more influential and more Zionist than in fact they were.” This can now be exposed as a weak attempt to whitewash the Jewish power play. When a small minority can dictate foreign policy, promote global war, and steer the outcome in their favor, then they have substantial power—no matter what anyone says. It was true in 1911; it was true in the 1912 election; and it would be clearly demonstrated once again in the case of the Balfour Declaration of 1917.

To recap: During Wilson’s first term, Jewish Americans achieved major political gains. Paul Warburg’s Federal Reserve Act was passed, and he was named to the Board. Henry Morgenthau, Sr. was nominated ambassador to Turkey, watching over Palestine. Brandeis was named to the Supreme Court. And Baruch became the second most powerful man in the land.

Jews also made important strides elsewhere in America during those four years. Two more Jewish governors were elected—Alexander in Idaho, and Bamburger in Utah. The motion-picture business witnessed the beginning of Jewish domination, with Universal Pictures (Carl Laemmle), Paramount (Zukor, Lasky, Frohmans, and Goldwyn), Fox Films (William Fox), and the early formation of “Warner” Bros. Pictures—in reality, the four Wonskolaser brothers: Hirsz, Aaron, Szmul, and Itzhak.[30]Jews had nearly a total monopoly on the film business. The only significant non-Jewish movie mogul was Darryl Zanuck, who was a studio head at 20th Century Fox for many years. This development would prove useful for wartime propaganda. And the Jewish population grew by some 500,000 people.

1917 was the first year of Wilson’s second term. The European war was into its third year, and looking increasingly like a stalemate. With the German resumption of U-boat attacks on shipping to the UK and the American declaration, a true world war was in hand. And it was also a time of revolution in Russia. In fact, two revolutions: the worker’s uprising in February that overthrew Czar Nicholas II, and the Bolshevik revolution in October that put the Jewish revolutionaries in power.

Leon Trotsky (1879-1940) born Lev Davidovich Bronstein was a Marxist revolutionary and the founder and first leader of the Red Army. By Isaac McBride (Barbarous Soviet Russia) [Public domain], via Wikimedia Commons
Leon Trotsky (1879-1940) born Lev Davidovich Bronstein was a Marxist revolutionary and the founder and first leader of the Red Army. By Isaac McBride (Barbarous Soviet Russia) [Public domain], via Wikimedia Commons

The role of Jews in the Russian revolution(s) is a complicated and interesting story. There isn’t space here to elaborate, but in brief, the communist movement had a heavy Jewish hand from its inception. Marx, of course, was a German Jew, and his writings inspired an 18-year-old Vladimir Lenin in 1888. Lenin was himself one-quarter Jewish (maternal grandfather: Alexandr Blank). In 1898, Lenin formed a revolutionary group, the Russian Social Democratic Worker’s Party (RSDWP), which was the early precursor to the Soviet Communist Party. Four years later, Lenin was joined by a full-blooded Jew, Leon Trotsky—born Lev Bronstein. Internal dissension led to a schism in 1903, at which time the RSDWP split into Bolshevik (‘majority’) and Menshevik (‘minority’) factions. Both factions were disproportionately Jewish. In addition to Lenin and Trotsky, leading Bolshevik Jews included Grigory Zinoviev, Yakov Sverdlov, Lev Kamenev (aka Rozenfeld), Karl Radek, Leonid Krassin, Alexander Litvinov, and Lazar Kaganovich. Ben-Sasson (1976: 943) observes that these men, and “others of Jewish origin…were prominent among the leaders of the Russian Bolshevik revolution.” This was public knowledge, even at the time. As the London Times reported in 1919,

One of the most curious features of the Bolshevist movement is the high percentage of non-Russian elements amongst its leaders. Of the 20 or 30 leaders who provide the central machinery of the Bolshevist movement, not less than 75 percent are Jews. … [T]he Jews provide the executive officers. (March 29, p. 10)

The article proceeds to list Trotsky and some 17 other individuals by name. Levin (1988: 13) notes that, at the 1907 RSDWP Congress, there were nearly 100 Jewish delegates, comprising about one third of the total. About 20% of the Mensheviks were Jews, but by 1917 they comprised eight of 17 (47%) of its Central Committee members.[31]Among the leading figures, Ben-Sasson (p. 944) mentions Julius Martov, Fyodor Dan, and Raphael Abramowitz.

Thus it was that, in the years leading up to the 1917 revolutions, Jews were working internally and externally to overthrow the Czar. Stein (1961: 98) quotes a Zionist memo of 1914, promoting “relations with the Jews in Eastern Europe and in America, so as to contribute to the overthrow of Czarist Russia and to secure the national autonomy of the Jews.” Temperley (1924: 173) noted that, “by 1917, [Russian Jews] had done much in preparation for that general disintegration of Russian national life, later recognized as the revolution.” Ziff (1938: 56) stated the common view of the time that “Jewish influence in Russia was supposed to be considerable. Jews were playing a prominent part in the revolution…”

Surprisingly, even Winston Churchill acknowledged this fact. In 1920 he wrote an infamous essay explaining the difference between the “good” (Zionist) Jews and the “bad” Bolsheviks. This dichotomy, which was nothing less than a “struggle for the soul of the Jewish people,” made it appear almost “as if the gospel of Christ and the gospel of Antichrist were destined to originate among the same people” (1920/2002: 24). The Zionists were “national” Jews who sought only a homeland for their beleaguered people. The evil “international Jews,” the Bolsheviks, sought revolution, chaos, and even world domination. It was, said Churchill, a “sinister conspiracy.” He continued:

This movement among the Jews is not new. From the days of Spartacus-Weishaupt to those of Karl Marx, and down to Trotsky (Russia), Bela Kun (Hungary), Rosa Luxemburg (Germany), and Emma Goldman (United States), this world-wide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilization and for the reconstitution of society on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence, and impossible equality, has been steadily growing. … It has been the mainspring of every subversive movement during the Nineteenth Century; and now at last this band of extraordinary personalities from the underworld of the great cities of Europe and America have gripped the Russian people by the hair of their heads and have become practically the undisputed masters of that enormous empire. (p. 25)

“There is no need to exaggerate” the Jewish role in the Russian revolution; “It is certainly a very great one. … [T]he majority of the leading figures are Jews.” In the Soviet institutions, “the predominance of Jews is even more astonishing.” But perhaps the worst aspect was the dominant role of Judeo-terrorism. Churchill was clear and explicit:

 [T]he prominent, if not indeed the principal, part in the system of terrorism applied by the Extraordinary Commissions for Combating Counter-Revolution has been taken by Jews, and in some notable cases by Jewesses. The same evil prominence was obtained by Jews in the brief period of terror during which Bela Kun ruled in Hungary. The same phenomenon has been presented in Germany (especially in Bavaria), so far as this madness has been allowed to prey upon the temporary prostration of the German people. … [T]he part played by the [Jews] in proportion to their numbers in the population is astonishing. (p. 26)

By this time, Churchill had been working on behalf of Zionist Jews for some 15 years. He had long counted on Jewish political support, and was rumored to be in the pay of wealthy Zionists.[32]Churchill’s close connection to British Jews dated back at least to 1904. Gilbert (2007: 9) explains that “this was the first but not the last time that Churchill was to be accused by his political opponents…of being in the pocket, and even in the pay, of wealthy Jews.” Makovsky (2007) describes Churchill’s father’s longtime association with “Jewish financial titans,” and notes that Churchill himself “came to count many of [his father’s] wealthy Jewish friends as his own” (p. 46).

The Russian revolutions were significant, but the premier event of 1917 was surely the Balfour Declaration of November 2. This short letter from the United Kingdom’s Foreign Secretary Arthur James Balfour to Baron Rothschild was remarkable: it promised to a “mere handful” of British subjects (and indirectly their coreligionists worldwide) a land that the United Kingdom did not possess, and that was part of some other empire. It is enlightening to examine the orthodox account of this event. According to the standard view, it was at this time that Britain was not only mired in the war on the Continent, but also that “British forces were fighting to win Palestine from the Ottoman Empire.”[33]Encyclopedias are usually good sources for conventional views. Quotations here come from the World Book, 2003 edition, entry on ‘Balfour Declaration.’ The Brits wanted it “because of its location near the Suez Canal.” (In fact, of course, Palestine is more than 200 km from the Canal, separated by the whole of the Sinai Peninsula.) “The British believed the Balfour Declaration would help gain support of this goal from Jewish leaders in the UK, the United States, and other countries.”

So, here are a few relevant questions: Was control of the Canal really the primary objective? Or did the British think that the Jews would help them in their broader war aims? The Jews?—a beleaguered minority everywhere, with no nation, no army, no “real power”? Could they really help the British Empire? And did they in fact help them? And if so, how?

Nothing in the documentation of the time suggests that the canal was anything more than an incidental concern. But there was clearly a larger goal—to enlist the aid of Jews everywhere, in order to help Britain win the war. Schneer (2010: 152) notes that, beginning in early 1916, the British sought to “explore seriously some kind of arrangement with ‘world Jewry’ or ‘Great Jewry’.” A diplomatic communiqué of March 13 is explicit:

 [T]he most influential part of Jewry in all the countries would very much appreciate an offer of agreement concerning Palestine… [I]t is clear that by utilizing the Zionist idea, important political results can be achieved. Among them will be the conversion, in favour of the Allies, of Jewish elements in the Orient, in the United States, and in other places… The only purpose of [His Majesty’s] Government is to find some arrangement…which might facilitate the conclusion of an agreement ensuring the Jewish support. (in Ziff 1938: 56)

Later that year, an advisor to the British government, James Malcolm, pressed this very point: that, by promising Palestine to the Zionists, they would use their influence around the world—and especially in America—to help bring about overall victory. On the face of it, this was a preposterous suggestion: that the downtrodden Jewish minority, and in particular the even smaller minority of Zionist Jews, could do anything to alter events in a world war.

And yet that quickly became the official view of the British government—particularly so when David Lloyd George became prime minister in December 1916. Lloyd George was, from the Zionist perspective, a nearly ideal leader. He had been working with them since 1903.[34]See Stein (1961: 28). He strongly believed in their near-mythic influence. And he was a devout Christian Zionist, making him an ideological compatriot. Immediately upon assuming office, Lloyd George directed his staff—in particular, Mark Sykes and Lord Arthur Balfour—to negotiate Jewish support. MacMillan explains:

From [early] 1917, with Lloyd George’s encouragement, Sykes met privately with Weizmann and other Zionists. The final, and perhaps most important, factor in swinging British support behind the Zionists was to make propaganda among Jews, particularly in the United States, which had not yet come into the war, and in Russia… (2003: 416; my italics)

And as if the stalled war wasn’t motivation enough, rumors were soon flying that the Zionists were also soliciting German support; the Jews, it seems, were willing to sell their services to the highest bidder.[35]See Lloyd George (1939: 725), Ziff (1938: 55), Stein (1961: 528), and Liebreich (2005: 12). When these rumors reached London, “the British government moved with speed” (ibid). And with speed they did. With Brandeis’s input, a first draft of the brief statement was completed in July. A second draft appeared in mid-October, and by the end of that month Balfour was ready to make public his Government’s stance: “from a purely diplomatic and political point of view, it was desirable that some declaration favourable to the aspirations of the Jewish nationalists should now be made. … If we could make a declaration favourable to such an ideal, we should be able to carry on extremely useful propaganda both in Russia and America.”[36]Minutes of the War Cabinet for October 31; see Ingrams (1972: 16). Three days later, they did.

But most striking was the implication that the “mere handful” of Zionist Jews in England could actually be a decisive factor in bringing a reluctant US into the global war. If successful, this would dramatically swing the military balance of power. And via Wilson’s Jewish advisors—most notably Baruch and Brandeis—they had the ear of the president. But could they do it?

Unquestionably, the Brits thought they could—and that they did. This is such an astonishing manifestation of Jewish power that it is worth reviewing the opinions of several commentators. Speaking after the war, on 4 July 1922, Churchill argued for full implementation of the famous Declaration:

Pledges and promises were made during the War… They were made because it was considered they would be of value to us in our struggle to win the War. It was considered that the support which the Jews could give us all over the world, and particularly in the United States, and also in Russia, would be a definite palpable advantage. (in Gilbert 2007: 78-79)

In his monumental six-volume study of the 1919 Paris Peace Conference, British historian Howard Temperley (1924) made this observation:

It was believed that if Great Britain declared for the fulfillment of Zionist aspirations in Palestine under her own pledge, one effect would be to bring Russian Jewry to the cause of the Entente [Allies]. It was believed, also, that such a declaration would have a potent influence upon world Jewry in the same way, and secure for the Entente the aid of Jewish financial interests. It was believed, further, that it would greatly influence American opinion in favour of the Allies. Such were the chief considerations which, during the later part of 1916 and the next ten months of 1917, impelled the British Government towards making a contract with Jewry. (1924, vol. 6: 173)

We must bear in mind that the Declaration was issued seven months after US entry into the war. But Temperley is unequivocal: the deal was concluded “during the later part of 1916,” well before Wilson’s decision to go to war. Apparently the deal was this: bring the US into the war, and we will promise you your Jewish homeland. Such was the “contract with Jewry.”

Sensing the importance, Temperley reiterates the point, to drive it home: “That it is in purpose a definite contract with Jewry is beyond question. … In spirit it is a pledge that, in return for services to be rendered by Jewry, the British Government would ‘use their best endeavours’ to secure… Palestine.” And in fact, it was a good deal all around. “The Declaration certainly rallied world Jewry, as a whole, to the side of the Entente… [T]he services of Jewry were not expected in vain, and were…well worth the price which had to be paid” (p. 174). Britain’s price was low: a spit of land far from the home country. True, there would be Arab resistance, but the Brits were used to that. A much higher price would be paid by Germany and the Central Powers, and by America—who would expend hundreds of millions of dollars, and suffer 116,000 war dead.

A Zionist insider, Samuel Landman, wrote a detailed and explicit account of these events in 1936. After noting some preliminary attempts in 1916, he remarks on the significance of Malcolm’s involvement. Malcolm knew that Wilson “always attached the greatest possible importance to the advice of a very prominent Zionist, Mr. Justice Brandeis…” (p. 4). Malcolm was able to convince Sykes and French ambassador Georges Picot that

the best and perhaps the only way…to induce the American President to come into the war was to secure the cooperation of Zionist Jews by promising them Palestine, and thus enlist and mobilize the hitherto unsuspectedly powerful forces of the Zionist Jews in America and elsewhere in favour of the Allies on a quid pro quo basis.

Granted, Landman was not an unbiased observer, and had good reason to exaggerate Zionist influence. But that was not the case with the British Royal Palestine Commission, which issued a report in 1937. At the critical stage of the war, “it was believed that Jewish sympathy or the reverse would make a substantial difference one way or the other to the Allied cause. In particular, Jewish sympathy would confirm the support of American Jewry…” (p. 23). The report then quotes Lloyd George:

The Zionist leaders gave us a definite promise that, if the Allies committed themselves to…a national home for the Jews in Palestine, they would do their best to rally Jewish sentiment and support throughout the world to the Allied cause. They kept their word.

Two years after this report, in 1939, the British contemplated starting a war with Germany. Churchill wrote a memo for his War Cabinet, reminding them that

it was not for light or sentimental reasons that Lord Balfour and the Government of 1917 made the promises to the Zionists which have been the cause of so much subsequent discussion. The influence of American Jewry was rated then as a factor of the highest importance, and we did not feel ourselves in such a strong position as to be able to treat it with indifference. (in Gilbert 2007: 165)

The implication, of course, was that the British might once again need Jewish help to defeat the Germans. Having been goaded into war in 1939 by Roosevelt and his Jewish advisors,[37]As I will explain in Part II, there is ample evidence that this was true. For a review of some of the relevant sources, see Weber (1983). In brief, it seems that Roosevelt wanted England and France to do the early ‘dirty work’ of the war, and then the US would intervene as needed to conclude the issue. the British were becoming desperate once again to draw in the Americans. As David Irving reports, it was in late 1941 that Weizmann and his fellow British Zionists began “promising to use their influence in Washington to bring the United States into the war” (2001: 73). Irving quotes from an amazingly blunt letter from Weizmann to Churchill, promising to do again in this war what they did in the last:

There is only one big ethnic group [in America] which is willing to stand, to a man, for Great Britain, and a policy of ‘all-out aid’ for her: the five million Jews. From [Treasury] Secretary Morgenthau [Henry, Jr.], Governor [Herbert] Lehman, Justice Frankfurter, down to the simplest Jewish workman or trader… It has been repeatedly acknowledged by British Statesmen that it was the Jews who, in the last war, effectively helped to tip the scales in America in favour of Great Britain. They are keen to do it—and may do it—again. (p. 77)

So here we have Weizmann explicitly naming the influential Jews with the power to bring Roosevelt and the United States into a war in which it, once again, had no compelling interest. The letter was dated September 10, 1941. Churchill did not have to wait long. Within 90 days, America would be at war.

Sources

  • Balakian, P. 2003. The Burning Tigris. Harper Collins.
  • Ben-Sasson, H. 1976. A History of the Jewish People. Harvard University Press.
  • Chalberg, J. (ed.) 1995. Isolationism. Greenhaven Press.
  • Churchill, W. 1920/2002. “Zionism versus Bolshevism.” In L. Brenner (ed.), 51 Documents: Zionist Collaboration with the Nazis. Barricade Books.
  • Cohen, N. 1963. “The abrogation of the Russo-American treaty of 1832.” Jewish Social Studies, 25(1).
  • Cooper, J. 1983. The Warrior and the Priest. Belknap.
  • Cooper, J. 2009. Woodrow Wilson. Knopf.
  • Dalton, T. 2011a. “Eternal strangers: Anti-Jewish musings throughout history” (part 1). The Occidental Quarterly, 11(2) http://toqonline.com/archives/v11n2/TOQv11n2Dalton.pdf.
  • Dalton, T. 2011b. “Eternal strangers: Anti-Jewish musings throughout history” (part 2). The Occidental Quarterly, 11(3).
  • Dalton, T. 2011c. “Eternal strangers: Anti-Jewish musings throughout history” (part 3). The Occidental Quarterly, 11(4).
  • Dalton, T. 2012. “Anglo-American perspectives on anti-Semitism.” The Occidental Quarterly, 12(3).
  • d’Holbach, P. 1770/1813. Ecce Homo! or a Critical Inquiry in the History of Jesus Christ. D. I. Eaton.
  • Gilbert, M. 2007. Churchill and the Jews. Holt.
  • Gordon, S. 1984. Hitler, Jews, and the “Jewish Question”. Princeton University Press.
  • Hegel, G. 1975. Early Theological Writings. (T. Knox, trans.). University of Pennsylvania Press.
  • Hertzberg, A. 1968. The French Enlightenment and the Jews. Columbia University Press.
  • Herzl, T. 1896/1967. The Jewish State. Pordes.
  • Hodgson, G. 2006. Woodrow Wilson’s Right Hand. Yale University Press.
  • Ingrams, D. (ed.) 1972. Palestine Papers: 1917-1922. G. Braziller.
  • Irving, D. 2001. Churchill’s War (vol. 2). Focal Point.
  • Kant, I. 1798/1979. Conflict of the Faculties. (M. Gregor, trans.). Abaris.
  • Landman, S. 1936. Great Britain, the Jews, and Palestine. New Zionist Press.
  • Levin, N. 1988. The Jews in the Soviet Union since 1917. NYU Press.
  • Levy, R. 1991. Anti-Semitism in the Modern World. D. C. Heath.
  • Liebreich, F. 2005. Britain’s Naval and Political Reaction to the Illegal Immigration of Jews to Palestine, 1945-1948. Routledge.
  • Lloyd George, D. 1939. Memoirs of the Peace Conference (vol. 2). Yale University Press.
  • MacMillan, M. 2003. Paris 1919. Random House.
  • Makovsky, M. 2007. Churchill’s Promised Land. Yale University Press.
  • Mommsen, T. 1854/1957. History of Rome (vol. 4). Free Press.
  • Rather, L. 1990. Reading Wagner. Louisiana State University Press.
  • Schneer, J. 2010. The Balfour Declaration. Random House.
  • Seligman, E. 1914. “Introduction.” Proceedings of the Academy of Political Science in the City of New York, 4(4).
  • Shogan, R. 2010. Prelude to Catastrophe. Ivan Dee.
  • Slomovitz, P. 1981. Purely Commentary. Wayne State University Press.
  • Sombart, W. 1911/1982. The Jews and Modern Capitalism. Transaction.
  • Stein, L. 1961. The Balfour Declaration. Valentine, Mitchell.
  • Stern, M. 1974. Greek and Latin Authors on Jews and Judaism (vol. 1). Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities.
  • Temperley, H. 1924. History of the Peace Conference of Paris (vol. 6). Hodder and Stoughton.
  • Ward, G. 1989. A First Class Temperament. Harper.
  • Weber, M. 1983. “President Roosevelt’s campaign to incite war in Europe: The secret Polish documents.” Journal of Historical Review, 4.
  • Ziff, W. 1938. The Rape of Palestine. Longmans, Green.

Notes

[1] It is clear that Joseph was Jewish: His father, Jacob, was renamed by God as “Israel” (Gen 35:10), and Joseph himself is repeatedly referred to as a “Hebrew” (e.g. Gen 39:14, 41:12).

[2] Roman History, 69.13.

[3] For Seneca’s and Quintilian’s comments, see Stern (1974), pages 431 and 513. For Tacitus, see his Annals (XV, 44), and Histories (5.8).

[4] History of Rome, vol. 4, p. 643.

[5] Ecce Homo! (1770/1813: 26, 28)

[6] Cited in Hertzberg (1968: 300).

[7] For Kant, see his Conflict of the Faculties (1798/1979: 101). Hegel’s quotation is from his Early Theological Writings (1975: 190).

[8] This is just a fraction of the negative observations of Jews over the centuries. For a more complete study, see my series Dalton (2011a, 2011b, 2011c, and 2012).

[9] A large area, comprising much of present-day Poland, Lithuania, Ukraine, and Belarus.

[10] In 1891 the New York Times ran the headline: “Russia’s Fierce Assault: Europe amazed at her treatment of Jews.” As the article explained, “Berlin…is overwhelmed by the advance wave of the flying Jews, driven on a day’s notice from their homes and swarming westward…” (May 31; p. 1).

[11] Cited in Rather (1990: 163).

[12] Cited in Levy (1991: 83-84).

[13] There are a few problems, however. First, the diary is dated some five months after the war actually started; it’s easy to recall a prediction after the fact. Second, Rosenthal’s book My Siberian Diary is nowhere to be found. The entry is recounted in an obscure periodical, The Jewish Era, dated January 1919 (p. 128); this was not only after the war was over, but after the Peace Conference had already begun.

[14] This was true of both Zionist and non-Zionist Jews. It’s worth noting that Zionism was a minority view among American Jews, at least for the first two decades of its existence. Many Jews, being ‘internationalists,’ did not feel the need for a Jewish homeland. And many realized that, should this come to pass, they would be charged with dual loyalty. But with the Zionists’ relentless pressure and record of success, they became the dominant view.

[15] For a contemporaneous account, see the London Times, 11 July 1911, p. 5.

[16] Cited in Slomovitz (1981: 6-7).

[17] Cited in Dearborn Independent (25 June 1921).

[18] April 11, p. 18. The same article goes on to decry “the systematic, relentless quiet grinding down of a people of more than 6,000,000 souls.” This figure surely strikes a chord—but that’s another story.

[19] Indeed—a “special effort” was made to get the support of Wilson, “whose influence was rising within the Democratic ranks” (p. 32).

[20] The Jews and Modern Capitalism (1911/1982), p. 44.

[21] Shogan (2010: xi).

[22] Dearborn Independent, 11 June 1921. The entire ‘international Jew’ series ran without a byline, and so for the sake of convenience I attribute them to Ford—even though it is virtually certain that he did not write the pieces himself.

[23] Cooper (1983: 194).

[24] War Expenditures: Parts 1 to 13. US Government Printing Office (1921: 1814, 1816).

[25] Cited in Chalberg (1995: 46-47).

[26] Other Americans died on foreign-flagged ships—most notoriously, 128 on the Lusitania. But this still pales in comparison to the thousands who would die in a war.

[27] Online at: www.historymatters.gmu.edu. I am not aware of any polling data supporting his claim that 90% of Americans were opposed to entering the war, but it seems to have been a reasonable estimate.

[28] Cited in Chalberg (1995: 71-73).

[29] Schneer (2010: 153) is typical: there was “no such thing” as a powerful Jewish force in world affairs. Any thoughts to the contrary are “based upon a misconception.” Hodgson (2006: 154-155) is another example: “the influence of Zionism [was] considerably exaggerated” by the British government, who believed the international Jews to be “more influential and more Zionist than in fact they were.”

[30] Jews had nearly a total monopoly on the film business. The only significant non-Jewish movie mogul was Darryl Zanuck, who was a studio head at 20th Century Fox for many years.

[31] Among the leading figures, Ben-Sasson (p. 944) mentions Julius Martov, Fyodor Dan, and Raphael Abramowitz.

[32] Churchill’s close connection to British Jews dated back at least to 1904. Gilbert (2007: 9) explains that “this was the first but not the last time that Churchill was to be accused by his political opponents…of being in the pocket, and even in the pay, of wealthy Jews.” Makovsky (2007) describes Churchill’s father’s longtime association with “Jewish financial titans,” and notes that Churchill himself “came to count many of [his father’s] wealthy Jewish friends as his own” (p. 46).

[33] Encyclopedias are usually good sources for conventional views. Quotations here come from the World Book, 2003 edition, entry on ‘Balfour Declaration.’

[34] See Stein (1961: 28).

[35] See Lloyd George (1939: 725), Ziff (1938: 55), Stein (1961: 528), and Liebreich (2005: 12).

[36] Minutes of the War Cabinet for October 31; see Ingrams (1972: 16).

[37] As I will explain in Part II, there is ample evidence that this was true. For a review of some of the relevant sources, see Weber (1983). In brief, it seems that Roosevelt wanted England and France to do the early ‘dirty work’ of the war, and then the US would intervene as needed to conclude the issue.

(Republished from Inconvenient History by permission of author or representative)
 
• Category: History • Tags: Jews, World War I 
Hide 329 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. Thomm says:

    It is amazing how obsessed WN wiggers are with Jews (even though Jews are white).

    WN obsession with claiming that Jews are conspiring against them is identical to black whining about whites, except at least whites are more numerous than blacks and once did enslave blacks. By contrast, White Trashionalists whining about Jews are just broadcasting their own inferiority through this very admission.

  2. Wally says:

    - The alleged number of Jews is complete nonsense. There are many, many more then they let on.
    Most Jews are not ‘religious’ so they do not say they are Jews in census questions about religion. They consider themselves Jews nonetheless. They want you to think they are so few & helpless victims when in fact they create massive resentment towards themselves by their owns actions.

    - The US Census is prohibited from counting ‘Jews’ and all US federal, state and local are similarly disallowed from ‘noticing’ Jewish formation and over representation.

    According to Jewish law Jews are to avoid being counted.
    “To actually count Jews directly is forbidden (Talmud, Yoma 22b), as the prophet says: “And the number of the children of Israel shall be as the sand of the sea, which shall neither be measured nor counted.”

    http://www.chabad.org/library/article_cdo/aid/896203/jewish/Laws-of-Counting-Jews.htmand

    ‘Why is it forbidden to count Jews?’

    http://www.israelnationalnews.com/Articles/Article.aspx/18472

    “This opening verse of our Biblical portion teaches that it is forbidden to take a number count of the Israelites, a census activity which Jewish organizations are constantly involved in doing. This prohibition is reinforced by the prophet Hosea (chapter 2), when he declares: “The number of the children of Israel shall be as the sands of the sea, which cannot be numbered and cannot be counted…” And historically even King David learned the bitter lesson of the power of this command, when- against the will of his Chief Commander Joab – he ordered a census, and the Israelites suffered a plague (II Samuel, 24).”

    - “This prohibition is reinforced by the prophet Hosea (chapter 2), when he declares: “The number of the children of Israel shall be as the sands of the sea, which cannot be numbered and cannot be counted…”

    - “I have seen all the (Jewish?) works that are done under the sun; and, behold, all is vanity and a striving after wind. That which is crooked cannot be made straight, and that which is wanting cannot be numbered….” Book of Ecclesiaste

    “We reached the [Balfour] Declaration not by miracles, but through persistent propaganda, through unceasing demonstration of the life force of our people. We told the responsible authorities: We will establish ourselves in Palestine whether you like it or not. You can hasten our arrival or you can equally retard it. It is however better for you to help us so as to avoid our constructive powers being turned into a destructive power which will overthrow the world.”

    - World Zionist leader [1st President of Israël] Chaim Weizmann, speech in Jerusalem, December 1919.

    • Agree: Z-man
  3. Alfred says:

    The story of the Jews having been in Egypt and having escaped in their “Exodus” is a total fabrication.

    There is absolutely no archaeological evidence of the Jews having been in Egypt during that period in any numbers. The Egyptians were excellent at recording their history. Furthermore, Palestine was drought afflicted during that period so there it was certainly not a land of “milk and honey.” The Jews of Israel and the British before them have searched for over 100 years for any evidence whatsoever that corresponds to the Old Testament – with no success. In fact, 2 years ago they discovered and Ancient Egyptian brewery in the centre of Tel Aviv that predated the alleged “Exodus.” The Egyptians abandoned that area as it reverted to desert. Yes, climate change does happen – and it has nothing to do with humans.

    “Ancient Egyptian brewery found in downtown Tel Aviv
    Potsherds used for producing beer discovered at site believed to be northernmost Egyptian settlement in Early Bronze Age, 5,000 years ago”

    https://www.timesofisrael.com/ancient-egyptian-brewery-found-in-downtown-tel-aviv/

    Places like “Jericho” never had walled fortifications. In fact, there were not such things anywhere until one goes into today’s Lebanon – and they were build by the crusaders centuries later.

    One the other hand, there is ample evidence that the Jews were in what is today called Yemen and Hejaz (Western Saudi Arabia). The fact that the Saudis have destroyed as much geological evidence as is possible is ample proof that they don’t want the Jews to claim their country as well.

    “Egypt knew no Pharaohs nor Israelites”

    https://amzn.com/B00U8VK8JE

    Oh. What’s the use. Everyone prefers the Hollywood version!

  4. There is section of text which is clearly the words of Dalton that is mistakenly included in a box that is supposed to be quoting from a newspaper article. There are also some sections of text that are repeated or are in the wrong place.

    [Fixed]

  5. The Jews did not invent usury ( I believe the Romans did) however, no group has ever controlled and destroyed more worlds than they have with this game of debt. They have made usury into an art form with many variations including compound interest and other esoteric scams that the average man does not understand. The Jews control the economic pathways of the world and know the weaknesses of mankind –money and greed. Using this simple formula and the politician’s lust for power they control everything. They use the same game plan in just about every country, village, or province and when caught or exposed claim they are victims of antisemitism, racism, or hate. Wars are a way to make money and to damage the world so the Jews can control more. The Jews have come out stronger and richer after every war. They are the financiers of death because their religion is a blood cult and they are the “chosen people.” The rest of mankind are their slaves and they have mastered the psychological manipulation of our deepest fears.

    Could you imagine in your wildest dreams how great society and civilization might have been without their continued control and destruction of mankind?

    • Replies: @Per/Norway
    , @Anon
    , @Miggle
    , @Anon
    , @anon
  6. Franz says:

    Jews never exceeded 2% of the German population. The public accepted the foreigners with a remarkable degree of tolerance, and more or less allowed them to dominate certain sectors of German society.

    As Egyptians had before and the USA after.

    No amount of denial can alter the fact loads of people know all this, have known it on the net since at least the Jewish Tribal Review put tons of pertinent information online years ago.

    The excuse is probably as old as David’s double-dealing in Egypt: Be like Mel and open your mouth and you’re finished. The Nile Valley surely had a term for “politically correct” but it’s not gonna be in no stinkin history book.

    This century’s version of the destruction of the Ottoman Empire is going to be vastly more dangerous than 1914. Russia now is not Turkey then. Turkey’s lots different too.

    The one necessary and sufficient condition to ending this situation is for enough people to see the Hebrew Scriptures as political tracts and nothing else. From Yahweh to Zion by Laurent Guyénot is an excellent eye-opener.

    • Replies: @annamaria
  7. Mastodon says:

    thankyou.

    evil exists

    peace

  8. I’ve never found any evidence that jews caused WWI.
    Great Britain caused WWI.
    However, there of course exists the possibility that behind the scenes jews did contribute, but again, nothing I ever read suggests this.
    Jews greatly contributed to anti German feelings in the USA during WWI:
    Henry Morgenthau, ‘Ambassador Morgenthau’s Story’, New York, 1918
    Heath W. Lowry, ‘The story behind Ambassador Morgenthau’s Story’, Istanbul 1990
    The lies of Henry Morgenthau were enough for the Versailles conference to blame Germany for the whole first world war.
    At the time Versailles was seen as a jewish conference.
    David Sinclair, ‘Hall of Mirrors’, London, 2001
    Thomas Fleming, ‘The Illusion of Victory, America in WW I’, New York 2003
    As to WWII, no doubt in my mind whatsoever that Bernard Baruch brought Franklin Roosevelt into politics in order to wage war, for controlling the whole world.
    Even in 1946, when failure was evident, Baruch pleaded for a world government.
    Bernard M. Baruch, ‘Die Jahre des Dienens’, München 1962 (The public years, New York, 1960)
    Bernard M. Baruch, Gute 88 Jahre, Autobiographie, München 1963 (New York)
    Charles A. Beard, ‘American Foreign Policy in the Making, 1932 – 1940, A study in responsibilities’, New Haven, 1946

    • Replies: @j2
    , @Wally
    , @Curmudgeon
    , @Josecanu
  9. Art says:

    The true hand book of the Jews is the Talmud — it shows total disrespect for Gentiles.

    The Talmud makes Hitler’s Mein Kompf look like a prayer book.

    Think Peace — Art

    • Agree: Jett Rucker
    • Replies: @Anonymous
  10. @Thomm

    Of course (((someone like you))) knows many Jews self-identify as a separate race.

    “Israel Official Talks Master Race”:
    — ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e8icC2BA_O8 )

    The goyim know.

    • Replies: @Jeff Stryker
  11. Anonymous[418] • Disclaimer says:
    @Art

    Jewsus, the original Anti-Fa, showed disrespect for Gentiles too, and denounced their Roman/Fascist White Patriarchy. See Matthew 20:25, Mark 10:42, Luke 22:25 for Jewish anti-Gentile propaganda.

    So it wasn’t just “Talmud” Jews. It was your Jewish Rabbi “savior.”

  12. Anonymous[418] • Disclaimer says:

    The public accepted the foreigners with a remarkable degree of tolerance

    Because fantasy afterlife narrative.

    We worship what we do know, for salvation is from the Jews.” John 4:22

  13. White tra$$hes ”are’ angels, always too naive to be evil by themselves…

    Acquired hyperreactive unrightism made whites [as well anyone], on very avg, terminally incapable to reach rational levels. A long history of successive absurdisms/stupidities at higher levels of expressivity.

  14. j2 says:
    @jilles dykstra

    “I’ve never found any evidence that jews caused WWI.
    Great Britain caused WWI.
    However, there of course exists the possibility that behind the scenes jews did contribute, but again, nothing I ever read suggests this.”

    There is some evidence that Freemasons caused WWI and also Masons handed power to Bolsheviks in the October revolution. You have to figure out what was the connection with Freemasons, with a clear Zionistic program as shown by Mordecai Noah and others, and Jews. You may find it was not the Jews as an ethnic group, it was a small group of Jews and Masons. Before WWI the UK believed that as a sea power it could crush Germany through a siege. The potential war was seen to be between Germany and France and the UK would support France so that Germany would not win, for balancing forces in the continent. The UK had nothing to gain from the war, so the WWI was most probably not started by the UK, but there were forces inside the UK that wanted the war. These forces were Masonic and they had an economically powerful Jewish component.

    • Replies: @Ger
  15. “Consider their progressive influence in American government. Beginning in the mid-1800s, we find a number of important milestones. In 1845, the first Jews were elected to both houses of Congress: Lewis Levin (Pa.) to the House and David Yulee (Fla.) to the Senate. By 1887 they had their first elected governor, Washington Bartlett in California. And in 1889, Solomon Hirsch became the first Jewish minister, nominated by President Harrison as ambassador to the Ottoman Empire—which at that time controlled Palestine.”

    The above list has a rather significant and fascinating omission:

    https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/judah-benjamin

  16. GB had perfectly imperialist reasons to cause WWI, to destroy Germany, the economic competitor they were unable to compeat with.
    The obligation to have the words Made In Germany had the opposite effect, more German products were bought, they were simply better.
    Then there was the Berlin Baghdad railway, to be extended to Basra.
    GB feared losing control in the ME, over oil, Lawrence spied near Mosul on the railway preparation, and feared smuggling from Basra to India of German products.
    Germany getting control over the Straits was another fear.
    Then there was zionism, it began under German protection, the Kaiser visited Jerusalem, 1890, from memory.
    Losing Palestine was another fear.
    Oil was important, in 1916 the first British mammoth battleship, the type called Dreadnought, was launched, it had oil fired turbines.
    Thus Balfour already said in 1907 to the USA ambassador ‘that war was maybe the cheapest way to maintain the British standard of living’.
    Edward Mead Earle, Ph.D., ‘Turkey, The Great Powers and The Bagdad Railway, A study in Imperialism’, 1923, 1924, New York
    Patrick J. Buchanan, ‘Churchill, Hitler and “The unnecessary war”, How Britain lost its empire and the west lost the world’, New York, 2008, Balfour, US ambassador Henry White, 1907, page 48/ 49
    S.Fischer-Fabian, ´Herrliche Zeiten, Die Deutschen und ihr Kaiserreich’, Wien 2006
    Trans ‘Marvellous times, the Germans and their emperor state’.

    • Replies: @Anon
    , @Anon
  17. Ger says:
    @j2

    ‘ Jews do not cause war’. But, it is very profitable to finance them and benefit from the spoils. The Unauthorized Biography of the Bush Family very well documents the world Jew banking system on the loot to be made. Most noteworthy are the Jews currently in US Congress (there are tons of them) pushing for war on many fronts and bankrupting the country to pour trillions into the pockets of the MICC, financed by Wall Street Jewish banks, etal,

    • Replies: @Macon Richardson
  18. @Alfred

    One the other hand, there is ample evidence that the Jews were in what is today called Yemen and Hejaz (Western Saudi Arabia). The fact that the Saudis have destroyed as much geological evidence as is possible is ample proof that they don’t want the Jews to claim their country as well.

    It is true that original Jews and Christians were Arabs, and yes those Jews mostly lived in Yemen and Hejaz . But the destruction of the Islamic Archeology is due to Wahhabi sick mind!

    • Replies: @anon
  19. @Thomm

    Thomm is a Hindu Indian alien living in a corrugated tin shack in Sheboygan, WI. He shares a Windows 95 laptop with the other 30 inhabitants of the dirt floored structure, that is powered by a cable spliced into a nearby overhead power line. They crap into gas station quickie mart bags and throw them over the dilapidated fence that separates their shack from an auto salvage yard. He learned everything he thinks he knows about America from old MTV interviews of Vanilla Ice and Marky Mark. 1994 is a very special year for him.

  20. The key to the jewish/Zionist control is their control of the money supply and via their control of every central bank in the world, as Nathan Rothschild said , I care not what puppet is put upon the throne of England , the man who controls the money supply controls the British empire and I control the money supply.

    Here in the U.S. the Zionists got their privately owned Fed through congress on December 23, 1913 and so at that point under an unconstitutional act signed by Wilson America was sold out to the Zionist bankers and the war agenda was set in motion to further the profits of the Zionist bankers and the Zionist NWO.

    Earlier the Zionists got their IRS passed in October 1913 and so with the passage of their FED and IRS they had the means to start wars and get the American people to pay for them while the Zionist FED ran America into trillions in debt and taxed the people to the hilt to pay for the debts that the Zionist war party caused and the wars that resulted caused millions of deaths in the Zionist caused wars.

    The Zionist caused wars started with WWI here in America and ran down through the Mideast and these last wars were perpetrated by the Israeli and Zionist deep state attack on the WTC to provide the excuse to attack Iraq and Afghanistan, and so for over 100 years the Zionists have kept America at war for the profit of the Zionist bankers and the Zionist goal of a NEW WORLD ORDER.

    Zionists are going to be the destruction of America , just as every parasite eventually destroys its host.

    • Agree: T. Weed
  21. Jake says:

    Every tree produces after its kind. Some trees only reveal what they are truly and fully after much long growth.

    Anglo-Saxon Puritanism was a Judaizing heresy. WASP culture is its first fruit, or rather the first manifestation of its principal fruit. The rest was coming in its own time unless WASP culture were overturned and the Judaizing stain of Anglo-Saxon Puritanism bleached clean, repudiated with much penance.

    WASP culture conquered the world, and not until the 20th century was it clear that it all was done for the Jews. When the time was right, Jews would be revealed as thoroughly controlling the WASP Empire, which truly is the Anglo-Zionist Empire.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  22. This is a manifestation of a peculiarly American mindset, which seems very odd (and irrational!) to my European mind, namely, that if you take the prevailing discourse on any subject and simply negate it, you are somehow showing clear-sightedness, perspicacity, independent thinking etc.. It fact, it is quite the contrary. It is the wholly irrational belief that the established discourse is always and automatically wrong and, even more irrationally, that that means that the opposite of the established discourse must automatically be right.
    The article is much too long-winded to be gone into in detail but the author doesn’t prove his case, in regard to either war. He uses uses a mixture of untruths, half-truths, plausible-sounding non sequiturs and juxtaposition of facts to create the impression of a reasoned argument. I’m reminded of a piece of doggerel we were taught in school to illustrate this practice: God is love, love is blind, Ray Charles is blind, therefore, Ray Charles is God!

  23. @Pat Kittle

    SOME MASTER RACE

    Jews are apparently a mongrel group of Levant people who intermarried with Italians and converted an entire tribe of Turkic people who then moved North and intermarried some with Slavs.

    That is a dog’s breakfast at the kitchen sink.

    Lots of races think they are the master race for no credible or empirical reason.

  24. @Thomm

    In my opinion White Trashnationalists really screw themselves by having kids at a young age and getting into drugs/trouble at a young age.

  25. anon[393] • Disclaimer says:
    @Thomm

    Well some were wiggers,Voltaire,Kant and Benjamin Franklin wore a wigs at times,Washington surely and Jefferson as well perhaps. But Nietzsche, Wagner,Churchill,Ford, were not wiggers.Nor are all the Jewish anti semites many of them also great intellects of notable achievement. The fact that some lower class whites are not in thrall to the propaganda machine enough to adopt the status symbol of anti racism, doesnt mean races dont exist or that their existence is expressed in their various traits, traits that have been noted for thousands of years by the the jews themselves and those who have observed them.I would suggest you deal with the reality that is organized jewish diaspora, that reality is impossible to hide at this point we are again at that eternal return of jewish overreach and exposure of their treachery to their generous hosts.Your propaganda tactics of status signalling is collapsing under the weight of the evidence, not only liberal jews like Unz but paleo con jews and alt right jews are breaking ranks and making confession contrition and reparations, this is the only proper response and the only one that will avoid the usual response.

    BTW
    The claim that whites recognizing the reality and skill of jewish treachery as a first step to countering an assault on their nations, is akin to blacks being pwnd by jews to believe whites generous paternalism of blacks is instead oppression, is a bit cleverer than than the class ploy. However while it appeals to certain neoreactionary cuck2.0 its also given birth to direction splitting into WN/altright and the relegating of a promising variant ot obscurity because they esentiallu cucked on the implications of reaction and the JQ.So thank you for helping with the cuck purge from the emerging right.

  26. WHITE TRASHNATIONALIST MANIFESTO

    1. Must have working poor parents but better if broken home or out-of-wedlock birth.

    2 No actual ethnic identity. Northern urban whites have their hyphenated heritage. But W.T. don’t.

    3. Attend rough public high schools-pummeled by Non-Asian minorities.

    4. Eschew college.

    5. Get into drugs young. You must be smoking pot by 14.

    6. Hypersexualized from molestation.

    7. Have not traveled or lived in other countries. Completely unworldly.

    8. Must reproduce young. Should have at least one kid by 22.

    9. Should either be divorced or out-of-wedlock birth.

    10. Must be heavy drinker and wrack up a series of minor charges.

  27. I’ve learned quite a lot from this article and from some commenters. Therefore I’ll leave blaming Jew for World Wars to the experts. However, one can hardly be blamed for thinking the annihilation of a few of Israels main antagonists, Iraq, Libya and Syria.

    That three Jews sit on SCOTUS, clearly over represented according to their population count among Americans, and that Jews, duel passport holders (Israel & USA) and Israelis are deeply entrenched and, some say, (Netenyahu for one) in control of USA, its clear the United States does not really belong to the American people.

    While Israelis spy on us, interfere in our electoral process, sabotage elections of politicians who do not support the idiotic – Israel’s right to exist statement, attack us without even a whisper of response from Presidents and Admirals such as what happened when they attacked the USS Liberty, and in the opinion of any, played a great big hand in the so-called attacks on the Twin Towers, the evidence points to Jews and Israelis and the most destructive, corrupt, deceitful and cruelest (Gaza?) people on the planet.

    According to Harpers Index, Jews were expelled from the settlements in what is now Brazil in 1538. I suppose, but I don’t know, that by now the terrorist organization, AIPAC, has had that tidbit scrubbed from the magazine. In any case, why were they expelled? Probably for the same reasons we are discussing them today.

    In the 1970′s tv documentaries about the Nazi concentration camps, the estimated numbers of Jews killed was not even 1 million. A decade or so later, 3 million. Today, 6 million. Most Americans are deceived into believing that WWll was foremost about Jews.

    I can’t wait until we start seeing movies about the depressed and emotionally messed up grandchildren of camp survivors crying about how horrible it was for them to listen to the stories about Nazi’s and concentration camps. The Holocaust industry is due to come out with yet another fantasy like It’s a Beautiful Life.

    I now watch movies carefully and listen for the reference of Israel and Jews. In movies such as the cowboy flick with Jackie Chan and Owen Wilson, they masterfully weave in a reference to Jews. In Oh Brother Where Art Thou, C. Phillip Hofmann runs through the brushes praising “The Israelites” several times, happys as he was to unload a big turd. I like that one most because it the most appropriate thought and action when thinking about Israelis.

    • Replies: @CoryCalculus007
    , @Miggle
  28. I miss PrissFactor.

    • Replies: @Wade
  29. Agent76 says:

    Apr 6, 2017 Woodrow Wilson

    The Great War For President Woodrow Wilson, the Great War was a crusade “to make the world safe for democracy” — a chance to transform the international order in America’s image. “No one had articulated a kind of vision of America as a global citizen,” says filmmaker Stephen Ives. But at the close of the war, Wilson’s arrogance and inflexibility ultimately undermined his own lofty goals.

    • Replies: @SolontoCroesus
  30. @Jeff Stryker

    WHITE TRASHNATIONALIST MANIFESTO

    You Hasbara Troll, trying to hijack the thread!

  31. @Wally

    If Jews are over-represented, it’s because the Ashkenazim have the highest average IQ in the world.* This means their bell-shaped IQ curve is shifted to the right of that of the average person’s — meaning that there are disproportionally more Jews at the far right (super-smart) end of the curve. Essentially, they are highly over-represented at the high-end, so it’s only natural that they should be over-represented in various fields of endeavor. Furthermore– oh, wait…. Hold on, haters, I have to get my phone — my Zionist masters are calling from Israel.

    * They score 0.75 to 1.0 standard deviations above the general European average, corresponding to an IQ 112-115. This has been seen in many studies (Backman, 1972; Levinson, 1959; Romanoff, 1976), although a recent review concludes that the advantage is slightly less, only half a standard deviation Lynn (2004). This fact has social significance because IQ (as measured by IQ tests) is the best predictor we have of success in academic subjects and most jobs.

  32. Wally says:
    @jilles dykstra

    Jilles Dykstra blunders again by citing books he has never read. LOL

    How do I know? I have previously asked for specific references, pages, quotes, etc. The results: nada.

    • Replies: @Jeffery Cohen
    , @Anon
  33. Wally says:
    @Jeff Stryker

    You’re confused:

    In every instance where blacks & browns are in great numbers, and / or control the governments of cities, counties, regions, states, countries, & continents we see:
    massive murder rates
    massive crime in general
    degraded property
    massive disease, especially STDs
    massive drug & alcohol abuse
    general filth, squalor
    massive birthrates
    inability / unwillingness to support their own children
    massive youth pregnancies rates
    massive school dropout rates
    incredibly low IQs & test scores
    violence as a way of life
    fathers nowhere to be found

    • Replies: @Jeff Stryker
  34. @prefer anon

    Name one 1970s documentary that said “not even 1 million.” I dare you.

    In the 1970′s tv documentaries about the Nazi concentration camps, the estimated numbers of Jews killed was not even 1 million. A decade or so later, 3 million. Today, 6 million. Most Americans are deceived into believing that WWll was foremost about Jews.

    • Replies: @anon
  35. Z-man says:

    The alleged number of Jews is complete nonsense. There are many, many more then they let on.
    Most Jews are not ‘religious’ so they do not say they are Jews in census questions about religion. They consider themselves Jews nonetheless. They want you to think they are so few & helpless victims when in fact they create massive resentment towards themselves by their owns actions.

    Interesting, I had a conversation with a co worker, many moons ago, who was telling me of an argument he was having with his rich liberal mother about just that who thought that the poor Jews were so small in population. He kept telling her that there are a lot more of them than you think. I argued that it’s their disproportionate power that makes them look more numerous. (Wry grin)

    - The US Census is prohibited from counting ‘Jews’ and all US federal, state and local are similarly disallowed from ‘noticing’ Jewish formation and over representation.

    Yes, good reminder. They should be labeled and tagged.

  36. @jilles dykstra

    Thew Jews have controlled Britain since the traitorous Cromwell accepted his 11 pieces of silver.

  37. @Thomm

    “White Trashionalists whining about Jews are just broadcasting their own inferiority through this very admission.”

    What a very Jewish thing to say.

    • Agree: Jeffery Cohen
    • Replies: @Thomm
  38. @Wally

    Jilles Dykstra blunders again by citing books he has never read. LOL

    Greetings Wally, he is proven Hasbara Troll like Jeff Stryker.

  39. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @jilles dykstra

    That’s what the English did from about 1100 on. It’s history is that of constant invasions of the continent and meddling. Ally with Spain against France France against the Hapsburgs Pope against France Hapsburgs against France. Foment all sorts of revolutions and separatist organizations in every country.

    Now that Brexit is going to happen I’m sure GB will be back to its old tricks by 2025.

    • Replies: @Anon
  40. I now read the whole article, a few remarks:
    - the Roosevelt name is a Dutch name, however, these Roosevelts descended from Portuguese jews who fled when christians took over the peninsula. They first lived in western France, somewhere near or in Le Havre, under a still Portuguese name. Jews took with them their worldwide business contacts
    - Bernard Baruch already in 1928 or 1929 prevented his friend Churchill from leaving politics, ‘because he saw great things for Churchill in the future’. These great things materialised, the end of the British empire.
    See his autobiographies I already mentioned.
    - Baruch, nowhere as far as I know proved beyond doubt, took over FDR’s investments in Warm Springs, where Bernard Baruch’s father was the chief medical doctor. As we know FDR died there, that he was hastily cremated is less known.
    Robert E. Sherwood, ‘Roosevelt und Hopkins’, 1950, Hamburg (Roosevelt and Hopkins, New York, 1948
    - Henry Ford after WWI called Baruch the economic dictator of the USA. Morgenthau sr had financed Wilson’s election, one might see a connection.
    Morgenthau’s hatred of Germany I’d say equals Baruch’s hatred.
    As to Germany’s problems with jews, they existed.
    Two great books on this, both written by jews:
    Fritz Stern, ‘Gold and Iron, Bismarck, Bleichröder, and the Building of the German Empire’, New York, 1977.
    Ismar Schorsch, ‘Jewish Reactions to German Anti-Semitism, 1870 – 1914′, New York 1972
    Similar problems in Hungary
    ‘Christianity and the Holocaust of the Hungarian Jewry’, Moshe Y Herclz, 1993 New York University press
    As to USA non neutrality in WWI:
    Charles Callan Tansill, ‘Amerika geht in den Krieg’, Stuttgart 1939 (America goes to War, 1938)
    About the Lusitania, as far as I know to this day radio conversation betweennthe Lusitania and the British admiralty is secret, the suggestion is that the Lusitanian was meant to be torpedoed.
    A great book on FDR Churchill cooperation early in WWII
    Thomas E. Mahl, ‘Desperate deception, British covert operations in the United States 1939-44’, Dulles, Virginia, 1998
    The writer suggests that FDR had the republican chairman of the convention murdered in order to get pro war Willkie nominated.
    On the day Willkie was nominated Churchill stopped peace negotiations with Hitler.
    As to the USA’s realations with the USSR after 1933: ambassador Davies was a nephew of Morgenthau

    • Replies: @Malaysian Truther
  41. Thomm says:
    @Nancy Pelosi's Latina Maid

    What a very Jewish thing to say.

    And? You are effectively admitting that I am intelligent and that you WN wiggers have IQs of 70. I love how you wiggers tremble in my presence.

    Any more questions?

  42. @Curmudgeon

    Unable to confirm this
    E. T. Raymond (Edward Raymond Thompson), ‘Disraeli: The Alien Patriot’, 1925, London

    • Replies: @Graukopf
  43. @CoryCalculus007

    The Jewish IQ debate may well be true. Studying the Talmud and its mental gymnastics to justify Jewish actions, would certainly give them a leg up on the rest of us. Throw in the Jewish schools, where dumbing down has not taken place, is another factor. Those Jews only schools allow networking to succeed without interference. It is the networking that places huge numbers of Jews, with unremarkable intellect, in positions of power. For example, I have heard “brilliant” Jews like Alan Dershowitz and Richard Perle being interviewed. They are lobbed softball questions and their responses are, quite frankly, little more than babble. They didn’t get there by being the brightest bulb in the box.

    • Replies: @SafeNow
    , @jawneelogik
  44. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @Wally

    No one can possibly cite specific pages of books they read unless the books are right there and the comment writer feels like citing the specific page.

    A comment section isn’t a PHD thesis that needs footnotes. Jilles makes comments on a variety of subjects unlike certain people who just clip and paste the same comment into every thread no matter how irrelevant the comment.

    • Agree: Miggle
  45. I cant read a long thing like this when the author begins by full and prostrate apology to those ‘he might hurt in his scientific and accurate presentation’

    I would think that all Dalton should care about is that what he presents is truthful to the best of his ability, and present the case straight up,without those first paragraphs.. and let the world assess its worth.

    if we have to deal with several paragraphs of even handed praise of the Jews even before we get to what Dalton has to say, then his wimpish approach attitude will necessary pervade and degrade his content making it useless for any serious consideration

  46. c matt says:
    @Thomm

    Know what is more amazing? You don’t point to one shred of evidence to refute any of this. Actually, that is not amazing – it is typical.

  47. George says:

    Some quibbles about the stuff about ancient animosities toward the so called Jews. At the time there really was an ethno linquistic national state in Judea. It is not clear who was pissing off the emperor. Was it Jews, Judeans, Christians, or some other group of Semites. It is also not clear if so called Jews were the only ones Romans hated. The various wars with Germans, Parthians, Huns probably have associated with them nasty quotes. The Jewish war was fought close to the Mediterranean coast making a successful campaign possible for Rome, elsewhere the Romans eventually lost.

    The 20th century for whatever reasons seems to have been the Jewish century in all areas of human endeavor. What you see as Jewish conspiracy could be just a statistical anomaly caused by the large number of Jews in all fields. The set up for Jews to be replaced by Asians is already in the works. America’s #1 capitalist apologist Ajit Pai. America’s #1 Red Kashama Swant. America’s #1 imperial apologist, John Yu. So expect to see South and East Asians playing the same role this century as Jews did last, with Jews winning a kind of booby prize, being the decadent WASPs of the 21st century. In many ways, I think the forever war could be explained as legacy whites (miltary) and legacy Jews trying to maintain prominence in the face of their own mediocrity (regression to their mean).

  48. @Wally

    [Too many off-topic comments. Change this if you want your comments published.]

    • Replies: @anonymous
  49. @CoryCalculus007

    You’re planting your flag on a disconnected factoid. Oh, no doubt the numbers are accurate — “Figures don’t lie (but liars sure do figure)” — but you’ve presented ONLY a factoid, not an argument, and not an assessment of how, when, why those Ashkenazi Jews got to be so smart. You haven’t asked any questions of the data.

    imo, rather, the way I stack up the data, the FACT that “Ashkenazi Jews” have the highest avg IQ in the world,

    correlated with the FACT Arthur Ruppin, the “creator of Hebrew culture in Palestine” was a eugenicist;

    correlated with the FACT that Eugenecist Ruppin established the parameters for the “human material” to make the “new Jew” to populate Palestine — > zionist Israel;

    correlated with the FACT that in Ruppin’s era, Slavic Jews were so pathetically dumb that even Vladimir Jabotinsky was repulsed by them;

    correlated with the FACT that Slavic/Eastern European who migrated to Palestine had to be sent back because they could not measure up;

    correlated with the FACT that Slavic / Polish Jews who were GIVEN land and support to settle in BieroBjain could not do so successfully; the women turned to prostitution and the men peddled their wares rather than use them to farm or manufacture;

    correlated with the FACT that on Feb. 14, 1933, Louis Brandeis directed that “all German Jews — all 587,000 German Jews leave Germany, for Palestine, which desperately needed their wealth and education, attained at German & Austrian universities;
    (a similar situation developed in the 1980s: Jews who had benefited from education in fine Russian universities migrated to Israel and formed the backbone of Israel’s “Start-Up Nation”)

    correlated with the FACT that Polish/Slavic/East European Jews formed the large majority of Jews who died in wars that Brandeis and his co-conspirators maneuvered to start; German Jews — the smart, wealthy Jews — had the lowest rate of deaths in WWII;

    correlated with the FACT that Jewish myths/sacred writings record in numerous places that the ancient Hebrew people slaughtered undesirable elements within their own group, the most notorious incident being when, as Michael Ledeen explained, “Jews killed Jews at Mount Sinai: the Levites, and I’m a proud Levite,” said Ledeen, “killed their fellow Jews on direction from Moses.”

    One hypothesis that emerges from this assembly of FACTS is that WWII was a process by which Jewish zionist elites led by Louis Brandeis culled the herd, eliminating Jews who were unfit “human material” for the “new Jew” to populate Palestine/Israel. Germans may have ‘pulled the trigger,’ but Brandeis and the zionist elite conceived the plan and set it in motion.

    That is one, major factor that produced “Ashkenazim [who] have the highest average IQ in the world.”

    Several other factors are,
    ~due in large measure to the practice of usury, Jews had access to far greater wealth than many other cultures in Europe and thus could afford the leisure to educate their young;

    ~ Jews were migratory people and settled in lands where educational institutions had been established by the natives, and Jews took advantage of those institutions. There is not a history of Jews building universities in the middle ages, but scholars of Jewish history discuss how Jewish young people enrolled in, i.e. University of Padua, in its fine medical school, post-expulsion from Spain.

    ~Gilad Atzmon has explained the Jewish practice of marrying the rabbi’s smart son to the wealthy merchant’s daughter, in order to produce a wealthy, educated elite.
    The practice was not broad-based, hence the vast bubble of dumb and dirt-poor Eastern European Jews in the late 19th- and early-20th century that had to be culled.

    • Replies: @Anon
    , @CoreyCalculus
  50. anon[317] • Disclaimer says:
    @Jeffery Cohen

    @ Jeffery Cohen
    please advice the creditable source of your statement (“..the destruction of the Islamic Archaeology is due to Wahhabi sick mind”).

    Zionism 1896 developed corporate oil as their warrior to take the oil from the Arabs. Engineering Wahhabism into the mind of as many amoral persons as possible is a result of influence and pressure that reduced USA and UK foreign policy.. into a set of generalized goals that include to weaponize as many amoral minds as possible with Wahhabism. Whenever the interest of Zionism is challenged, these human weapons, led by the Ghost of Terror, appears to impose regime change, to destroy life style comforting infra-structure, and to reduce the habitats of those who live there to rubble, in order to make room for the oil bandits.

    I would love for you or anyone to prove the long standing thesis wrong, but I cannot accept that the weapon is responsible for the destruction of Islamic Archaeology, its not even the person who pulls the trigger or wacks the head off, its the Oligarch and their corporate interests that control the awesome powers of goverments that are responsible.

    Dalton’s article is fantastic.. research well done.. and well presented.

    • Agree: Jeffery Cohen
  51. LarryS says:

    “Before the time of the mashiach, there shall be war and suffering.
    The mashiach will bring about the political and spiritual redemption of the Jewish people by bringing us back to Israel and restoring Jerusalem . He will establish a government in Israel that will be the center of all world government, both for Jews and gentiles. He will rebuild theTemple and re-establish its worship. He will restore the religious court system of Israel and establish Jewish law as the law of the land.”

    http://www.jewfaq.org/mashiach.htm

    • Replies: @Jeffery Cohen
    , @Anon
  52. McAron says:

    In vino veritas.
    I hope Mel Gibson reads this article

  53. @LarryS

    “Before the time of the mashiach, there shall be war and suffering.
    The mashiach will bring about the political and spiritual redemption of the Jewish people by bringing us back to Israel and restoring Jerusalem . He will establish a government in Israel that will be the center of all world government, both for Jews and gentiles. He will rebuild theTemple and re-establish its worship. He will restore the religious court system of Israel and establish Jewish law as the law of the land.”

    Because some obsolete religion believes in this BS, the whole humanity is to suffer. Where is the proof?

    And, god needs help to make his prophesies to come true!

  54. Art says:
    @Jeff Stryker

    WHITE TRASHNATIONALIST MANIFESTO

    Oh dear – a Talmud Middle School grad speaks up! (He is now in Talmud Lemming High.)

    Little Master Talmud Pride – gives us his indoctrinated sick hateful views of Western folks. (He is so smart.)

    Think Peace — Art

    p.s. Hmm – how many Palestinian children did Talmud Pride kill today?

    • Replies: @MikeatMikedotMike
  55. MarkinLA says:
    @CoryCalculus007

    As Ron Unz has pointed out, the huge number of whites should negate a lot of that. If you have 200 million people with average IQ of 100 and 6 million with average IQs of 115 the total number of people with IQs of 150 is higher with whites. The issue is one of networking and cronyism in garbage areas where actual accomplishment is hard to determine like the law, social “sciences”, economics, and the media which Jews dominate more by networking than by doing anything constructive for society.

    • Agree: Wade
  56. Anonymous[817] • Disclaimer says:
    @Jake

    All of Christianity is a Judaizing heresy, including your Catholicism.

    Jew Testament: “The Jew First.” ~Romans 1:16

    Catechism: “To the Jews ‘belong the sonship, the glory, the covenants, the giving of the law, the worship…’” ~vatican.va/archive/ccc_css/archive/catechism/p123a9p3.htm

    Pope: “Inside every Christian is a Jew.” ~washingtonpost.com/national/religion/pope-francis-inside-every-christian-is-a-jew/2014/06/13/775750fc-f324-11e3-8d66-029598e98add_story.html

  57. Heros says:

    License plate number A 111 118 on the Austrian crown princes auto in Sarajevo= Armistice 11/11/1918.

    Whoever caused WWI knew already on the day they got it started on what day their ritual slaughter was going to end. If we look only at what happened in 1914, it is possible that this secret organization had nothing to do with judaism. If we look at the history of what happened after 11/11/18 and what is going on to this very minute, it is obvious that the first world war was all about Eretz Israel, as was practically every war since.

    • Replies: @Mr. Anon
  58. Mr. ANon says:
    @Thomm

    It is amazing how obsessed WN wiggers are with Jews (even though Jews are white).

    Can you point to anything the author said that was wrong? If so, do so.

    It is remarkable how degenerates like you are obsessed with obscuring actual arguments with rhetorical squid-ink.

  59. Mr. Anon says:
    @Michael Kenny

    The article is much too long-winded to be gone into in detail…..

    …..because you would not be able to say that any particular thing about it is wrong?

    It is the wholly irrational belief that the established discourse is always and automatically wrong and, even more irrationally, that that means that the opposite of the established discourse must automatically be right.

    The author of the article seems to be contending that a particular small group of people were powerful, and often got their way. The fact that powerful people and/or authoritative sources, contemporaneous to that time, said that this group was powerful, as evidenced by the fact that they actively sought out their help, would tend to support the authors argument. What part of the article do you contend is wrong? Can you say? Or are you just, in effect, covering your ears and repeating “Nah, Nah, Nah, Nah, Not Listening”.

  60. TomVe says:

    It seems to me that Jews contradict themselves. On the one had they are proud of their success and corresponding power, and on the other they don’t want to be accused of using that success and power to affect society.

    For example:

    1) Joel Stein wrote: “Who runs Hollywood? C’mon “

    “I don’t care if Americans think we’re running the news media, Hollywood, Wall Street or the government. I just care that we get to keep running them.”

    http://articles.latimes.com/2008/dec/19/opinion/oe-stein19

    3) Alan Dersowwitz says:
    “We earned our influence in this country by contributing more to its success than others– so now use your influence! Jews need to use their financial power to punish Israel’s critics.”

    https://mondoweiss.net/2017/05/influence-dershowitz-scarsdale/

  61. @Agent76

    What rubbish.

    Wilson was a fool and a pawn in a game he did not comprehend.

    Joyce Carol Oates wrote Wilson into “The Accursed” and revealed a version of the callow preacher/prude/president that his propagandists prefer to sugar-coat.

    “Woodrow Wilson is also present and accounted for, painted in scalpel-sharp Oatesian prose as a high-functioning but deeply paranoid university administrator, convinced that his archenemy, Dean Andrew Fleming West, will do anything to bring him low (as might in fact be the case — I told you, this book swarms with ambiguities). The man who would survive at least two strokes to become one of America’s pivotal presidents is here depicted as a racist, sexually repressed hypochondriac whose daily intake of patent medicines includes morphine, heroin and opium. He is also the proud possessor of his very own stomach pump, to the use of which he seems addicted.” https://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/17/books/review/the-accursed-by-joyce-carol-oates.html

    As I recall, Oates devotes some attention to Wilson’s love-life, consistent with the allegations of Benjamin Freedman that one of Wilson’s lover’s blackmailed him: she offered to exchange Wilson’s love letters for $40,000; Samuel Untermeyer offered to pay the amount for the penurious Wilson, in exchange for the appointment of Louis Brandeis to the Supreme Court.

    Brandeis was, by that time, passionately committed to Zionism and the head of the zionist effort worldwide. Jeffrey Rosen, a Brandeis biographer & head of US Center for the Constitution, has stated that above all others, Brandeis, Rosen’s idol, is responsible for creating “a homeland for Jews in Palestine.”

    https://www.ihr.org/jhr/v06/v06p389_John.html

  62. Mr. Anon says:
    @Heros

    License plate number A 111 118 on the Austrian crown princes auto in Sarajevo= Armistice 11/11/1918.

    It’s acutally AIII 118, i.e. roman numeral three.

    Still, it is a (somewhat) remarkable coincidence, much like the expiration date on Neo’s identity card in The Matrix – Sept. 11, 2001. If anything however, it is more suggestive of the notion that we live in a computer simulation rather than that the World is controlled by a vast, multi-generational illuminati conspiracy. For the record, I don’t believe in either of those two fantasies.

  63. Mr. Anon says:
    @Thomm

    Nobody “trembles in your presence”. Although I’m sure quite a lot of people – especially women – evince obvious disgust in the presence of your repellant personality.

  64. Dykeward says:

    Much of the foregoing is given fascinating chapter and verse in the late Douglas Reed’s magisterial Controversy of Zion, which someone has helpfully uploaded to the web

    https://www.controversyofzion.info

  65. awry says:

    They are also pretty dominant in non-garbage areas like mathematics and theoretical physics.
    Of course you can say that networking plays a role in those areas too, but there one must have some actual accomplishment, it cannot be replaced by pure bullshitting.
    Maybe they don’t just have a higher average IQ but there tends to be more of them at both extremes. As the saying goes, a smart Jew is very smart, a dumb Jew is very dumb.

    • Replies: @MarkinLA
    , @Wizard of Oz
  66. Wade says:
    @SolontoCroesus

    Yeah me too. Whatever happened to him? The American Pravda series would’ve been right down his alley.

  67. Mulegino1 says:

    Insofar as the world falls under the malevolent influence of organized Jewry, it becomes ever more hateful, ugly, depraved, violent, impoverished and deformed. The international Jew knows no craft or artifice but cultural and societal demolition and no operating principles other than diabolical hatred for the natural order and the desire for its destruction. A destructive nature and a delight in perversion are the international Jew’s twin identities, and he derives his greatest pleasure from the corruption of innocence and the ruination of all creative endeavor that he or his tribal confreres cannot personally benefit from.

    It is a shame that so many of those who, by mere accident of birth and default identification as “Jews”, are swept up in this.

    • Replies: @skrik
  68. This is a serious thesis supported by massive evidence compiled in two books by two Scotsmen, R. Docherty and James Macgregor, the first entitled Hidden History. The thesis is briefly that Cecil Rhodes, Lord Esher, Lord Rothschild and others eventually including Winston Churchill formed a secret cabal to foment war by England, Russia and France against Germany because they feared the power of the German economy. This happened again with new partners in 1939, and resulted in the death by starvation and exposure of more than ten million people. AFTER THE WAR. The victorious allies were responsible.
    But in Germany as elsewhere, what is known about this is not true, and what is true is not known.
    Within a few years of defeat and after almost unimaginable pain, terror and destruction, the Germans were once again the richest people in Europe. Showing that for the British, the war was pointless and for the Germans the war was unnecessary.

    James Bacque
    Penetanguishene ON

    • Replies: @anon
    , @refl
    , @Jon Baptist
  69. @Alfred

    Concerning the many improbably yarns found in the Torah, not only is there no corroborating archeological evidence for the alleged exodus, ‘Jewish kingdom’ or other fanciful tales and miracles involving the Chosen People, but the ancient Egyptians make virtually no mention of the Jews.

    On the other hand, the Jews refer to the Egyptians (who truly did nexist) over 1,000 times in their sacred texts.

    Most, if not all, of ancient Jewish ‘history’ may be entirely mythical. In addition, many biblical stories found in the Old Testament mirror stories first told by the Sumerians, who exited many centuries before the Jews.

  70. renfro says:
    @CoryCalculus007

    I have not much faith in IQ testing of most groups or populations.
    First how do they ‘select’ for testing. That is a big factor in results.

    We are told Jews have higher Q evidenced by the professions and etc they engage in or what education levels they reach…..but if you tested all the Jews in complicated financial fields like WS and all the non Jews working in the same you would likely get same IQ results for Jews and non Jews. Likewise for MBA graduates at Harvard or Yale, doubt there would be higher IQ Jews than Non Jews. Likewise in fields like medicine , research etc.. If you tested the Jewish guy that works as a salesman at the store I buy suits from and the other two non Jews who work there their IQs would likely be close or the same also.

    The Ashkenazim are touted as high IQs some where between 110 and 115 , but Israel is majority Ashkenazim and the average (mass) IQ in Israel is 94 vr US total (mass) average of 98 (even after diversity numbers drag it down). Anglo Saxon Germany has the highest (mass) average at 105. The Asian mass averages are also high.
    Cleary something is going on that is not strictly gene based, like culture, exposure to learning, traditions etc..

    • Agree: jacques sheete
  71. anonymous[340] • Disclaimer says:
    @Michael Kenny

    Did you just insert “in regard to either war” into what is otherwise a perfectly generic, insubstantial rejection of anything that might ever be said at length about anything by any American?

    If you’ve nothing to bring forth, please use that little AGREE/DISAGREE/ETC. button.

  72. @Art

    He’s a millennial expat whack job, who claims to be from the mean streets of suburban Detroit or some such. He and his Hindjew shack-job Thomm get off on trolling the straights around here. I suggest you not waste time engaging their ululations in any serious way. They are good for only mockery or indifference.

    • Replies: @Thomm
    , @Jeff Stryker
  73. Josecanuc says:
    @Thomm

    
    paraphrasing Schopenhauer:

    “The true philosophy of history lies in perceiving that, in all the endless changes and motley complexity of events…. the Jew is the self-same unchangeable being that is before us today and which pursues the same ends as it did yesterday and ever will.”

    “Who can save us from ourselves?” Rabbi Meir Kahane

  74. anonymous[340] • Disclaimer says:
    @Jeff Stryker

    Could someone please encourage Mr. Sailer to do this?

    For example, there’s a discussion of some kind of human dogfighting woven throughout a thread under a blog entry about the recent Senate hearing on (now) Justice Kavanaugh.

  75. Martina says:

    At the same time, the wars had grown bigger and more destructive ever since the printing press and the reformation. WW1 was logical.

    And the Young Turks and the reshaping of Turkey into a nation state is also logical after the total triumph of the nation state in the 19th century.

    I do not need a jewish plot to explain these two phenomenon.

    • Replies: @ploni almoni
  76. Thomm says:
    @MikeatMikedotMike

    False. MikeatMikedotMike is just bitter that he can’t even compete with mid-tier third-worlders in his workplace (which he will be fired from before long).

    He thinks Indians are Jews and Jews are Gentiles and both are Chinese. This is the paranoia that someone with an extremely low IQ lives with, as he demonstrates.

    He can’t accept that he was designated as waste matter by evolution, and he isn’t a functional member of the white race. That is why white women keep him out of respectable society.

    Heh heh heh heh

  77. @niteranger

    i suggest you try to read about the Babylonian money/debt system…

    • Replies: @kapimo
  78. Josecanu says:
    @jilles dykstra

    
    Don’t remember where I copied this quote but it certainly squares with their past and present character.

    “Israel (the Jews) won the war [WW I]; we made; we thrived on it; we profited from it. It was our supreme revenge on Christianity.”
    The Jewish Austrian Ambassador to London, Count Mensdorf, 1918

    ‘I believe their object to be as impure as the means by which their power has been acquired, and denounce them..” Whig MP Thomas Duncombe, February 1828

    And who was Disrael (‘Of Israel’) thinking about when, in a slip of honesty, he disclosed that:

    “The world is governed by very different personages from what is imagined by those who are not behind the scenes.” Benjamin Disraeli, PM Britain, 1856

  79. I started reading, but I immediately stumbled upon this:

    As far back as the Book of Genesis, we find stories such as that of Joseph, son of Jacob, sold into slavery in Egypt. Joseph earns the favor of the Pharaoh and is elevated to a position of power. When a famine strikes, Joseph develops and implements a brutal policy of exploitation, leading Egyptian farmers to sell their land, ..

    Sorry, but this never happened. There was never a Jewish sojourn in Egypt. So I ceased reading …

    • Replies: @ariadna
  80. anon[317] • Disclaimer says:
    @james bacque

    think you are not quite right with the thesis..
    It starts with the realization about 1860 that right after the civil war in America that slave trading was on the decline and that ships would no longer find markets for their whale oil. This new found thing was starting to come on strong, it was called Petroleum.. as the banker financiers’ of ships and such, discovered most of the oil in the world was within the Ottoman Empire.. Problem how to get the oil from the Ottoman..
    Another problem in 1886 (i think) it was that the German high command made a deal with the Ottoman to build them a road from Berlin to Baghdad in exchange for unlimited access to the oil. A deal that scared the hell out of the French, Italian and British banking and corporate establishments creating oh no you damn Germans are not got to get at the Ottoman oil and leave us out. Well just take if from you.
    So along came a wacko ( Hertzl, disturbed over German’s treatment of his Jewish self; wanted to form a fight back revenge organization,); afforded opportunity to bankers, to finance Hertzl’s first Jewish Congress, the congress, its proceedings and its glorious goal became cover for take the oil from the Arab (Ottoman) and deny German access to Arab oil, block the Russians if they get too close to control of the oil, but Russia was needed to attack Germany from the East.

    WWI was about stealing the Ottoman oil, it took America and the might of half of Europe; result rendered the British and French bankers and their corporations control over the entire Ottoman Empire (British Palestine and French Syria). Israel was as military base with nation state rights. WWII was necessary because Germany under Hitler regained its strength faster than the allies could image. So a war to quash all of German power, and as it turned out, Hitler’s need to deal with the Jewish question in the mist of war conducted against Germany by the Jewish Interest , to be a highly profitable for propaganda purposes (Holocaust).

    I think the thesis of the article does not suggest a cabal in a formal sense by Cecil Rhodes, Lord Esher, Lord Rothschild and others eventually including Winston Churchill buy instead evidences a powerful carefully orchestrated global intent on the part of these and many other Zionist to foment war by England, Russia and France against Germany and to bring the USA in because the British and French feared the powerful German economy and military capacity would deny England and France access to the Ottoman oil. This was not a religious thing, the organized Zionist used and abused the religious Jews to their advantage.. all through this time.

    several smaller and earlier Zionist attempts to get at the Ottoman occurred; attempts that tried to use the military to overthrow the Ottoman. The Ottoman figured it out at Salonika and burned out the wealthy Jews that had been in Salonika since being expelled from Portugal and Spain in 1392-1402. The Salonika group disbursed about 1904-1908(I can’t remember exact date) to NYC and St. Petersburg. if you do not agree please explain where?

  81. Agent76 says:

    May 31, 2016 Who Are The Rothschild’s, A Look Into The Corporate Dynasty

    Who are the Rothschild Family? This wealthy and influential family has funded wars, and helps sculpt the face of history. The 300 year old family line has become a corporate family dynasty, their wealth and influence are incalculable.

  82. anon[228] • Disclaimer says:
    @CoryCalculus007

    Read Ron Unz

    • Replies: @Anon
  83. ariadna says:
    @Thomm

    @Thomm: All along I believed you were a troll just spewing hasbara but you blew it with this comment. It’s hard to play a jew when you are not a member of the self-worshipping tribe. You may get the themes right, you may get the jewish “facts” right but you miss the subtleties that make a jew talking to non-jews authentic.
    That bit about “trembling” for instance was gross overacting.
    It’s not that a jew doesn’t think that way– overweening arrogance and contempt steeped in hatred — or talk like that among his tribe mates. Nevertheless, when in mixed company, some ancestral, by now hard-wired, instinct of self-preservation reminds even a jew writing under the shield of anonymity the tenet of “deceit first, last, and in between” because it may not be “good for the jews.” I think you are a not-quite-ready for prime time, well-intentioned, commentary-stimulating actor auditioning for the role of “I am not a Jew but I play one on Unz Review.”

    • LOL: Allan
    • Replies: @Thomm
  84. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @SolontoCroesus

    That’s what Rabbi Chaim Michael Dov Weissmandel claimed about the Zionist and Russian communist Jews. His conclusion was that the Zionist kidnapped the children of his Hungarian and Slav followers and trained them to be Zionist atheist socialist pioneers and turned the adults over to the Germans’

  85. KenH says:

    This is an excellent albeit extremely long article that I’m only half way through. It’s probably an understatement to say that Jews have been both the guiding and often hidden hand behind events leading up to to two major European wars in the 20th century. They did invent communism and start the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia which led to the rise of Hitler and National Socialism as a countervailing force and WWII.

    The pagan Romans characterization of the Jews was apropos and even to this day they are fomentors of social unrest and plague throughout the West and especially here in America.

    It’s been said that if the Jews lose America they lose the world and it’s apparent they’re acutely aware of this which is why they hate Trump with such passion and are doing everything they can do stamp out and impose a de facto criminalization of white indentitarianism and pro-white political dissent. They will suffer no setbacks to their goal of America as global plantation and slave of Israel and white genocide.

    • Replies: @nsa
  86. Mr. Anon says:
    @Thomm

    Heh heh heh heh

    The simpering giggle of a puerile degenerate.

  87. Thomm says:
    @ariadna

    Except that I am not a Jew, and never said I was. I am just a regular American white (‘gentile’) guy.

    I have also been called Chinese, for praising their focus on the big picture while the US obsesses over the latest media circus (e.g. Kavanaugh), and Indian (simply for defending Dinesh D’Souza from White Trashionalists and their left-wing economic views).

    Do try to keep up.

    • Replies: @Colin Wright
    , @ariadna
    , @Anon
  88. refl says:
    @james bacque

    Thanks for mentioning the work of Docherty and Mac Gregor, which I have also promoted here time and again.
    They show that Churchill right at the begining of August 1914 forced the Ottoman empire to take the German side in the war. This happened by denying them two new and already paid for battleships which instead he claimed for the British Navy and furthermore by bottling up two German battleships in the Dardanelles which the Germans then leased to the Turks not to lose them. This finally brought Turkey into the war on the German side.
    To have Turkey on the German side was eminently important if Palestine was to be taken in the peace treaty. Turkey would otherwise have stayed neutral or even have joined the Entente lateron.

    If true, to hand Palestine for the Zionists was the agenda from the start. It also shows that Churchill was confident in final victory to the point that he deliberately forced a potential mayor ally into the enemy camp. Thus, from the start of the war it was assured that the US would finally join the Entente. The rest was done by mounting up war dept which could only be garantied by the newly installed Fed.
    Furthermore Docherty and Mac Gregor demonstrate that the British Navy under Churchill deliberately misshandled the blockade for two years to keep Germany in the war. To get the US into the war and to arrange for something as crazy as the Balfour declaration took time. The planners of WWI were not out to win a war but to produce the disaster of continental scale that allowed them to rearrange the world.

    • Replies: @jilles dykstra
  89. ‘“I’ve never found any evidence that jews caused WWI.
    Great Britain caused WWI.
    However, there of course exists the possibility that behind the scenes jews did contribute, but again, nothing I ever read suggests this.”

    There is some evidence that Freemasons caused WWI…’

    In other words, ‘Jews didn’t cause WW1, Britain did.’ ‘No, Freemasons did.’

    One thing’s for sure: it was a plot. The Unz Review at its finest.

  90. @Thomm

    ‘Except that I am not a Jew, and never said I was. I am just a regular American white (‘gentile’) guy.

    I have also been called Chinese…’

    This may merely demonstrate that you are always a troll.

  91. ariadna says:

    Of course it is utter nonsense to claim the Jews had a hand in all the wars or even in most of them. They had absolutely nothing to do with the three Punic wars. They were in no way involved in the Gallic wars although they were superb horsemen and rumor had it Caesar wanted to recruit them for the Legio X Equestris, but they steadfastly refused because they were dedicated to ‘shalom.’ No Jewish presence was ever documented in the Aztec flower war and the Aztec custom of extracting hearts for ritual purposes bears not even the remotest resemblance to the Israeli practice of trafficking Palestinians organs. The list of wars in which jews had no hand can go on and on. The two world wars, OK, yes.

    • Replies: @ploni almoni
  92. @Thomm

    That’s it? The same copy and paste reply you flail back at everyone that puts you back in the tin hut?

    Zzzzzzzz

    You’re like a stray dog, running from a pack of sub-continentals crazed from hunger.

  93. ariadna says:
    @Thomm

    Chinese, Indian, why, I never…. so non-jew and yet so protean. How can I keep up….

  94. @Michael Kenny

    ‘…God is love, love is blind, Ray Charles is blind, therefore, Ray Charles is God!’

    ? I thought Morgan Freeman was God.

  95. A gang of Russian Jews assassinated the Russian PM on September 1911 in order to set in motion the Russian revolution of 1917! Pay attention to this date “Sep 1911” and it’s significance for the US! Of course the ensuing chaos created in the ME by the US forces since 2003 has helped and still is helping the “Z’s” to achieve their goals freely with no obstacles!

  96. ariadna says:
    @Bardon Kaldian

    @Bardon Kaldian: You’re right– that’s not “historical evidence” but since it was written by jews about themselves and their mythical history it provides powerful insight into the Hebraic worldview, mentality and ethos and should be valued as such.

  97. SafeNow says:
    @Curmudgeon

    Alan Dershowitz was first in his class at Yale Law School. That tells us that he was in fact the “brightest bulb”…in THAT “box.” Thus, he “got there” by being the brightest bulb…but in a different box. This happens all the time in our culture. Roger Ebert, the incomparable movie critic, in his original review of The Graduate, panned “the forgettable music of Simon and Garfunkel.” (He later graciously admitted “I was wrong.”)

    • Replies: @Wally
    , @MarkinLA
  98. annamaria says:
    @Franz

    Churchill: “… so far as this madness has been allowed to prey upon the temporary prostration of the German people. … [T]he part played by the [Jews] in proportion to their numbers in the population is astonishing.”
    — Replace “German people” with “American people” and here we are today: “this madness has been allowed to prey upon the temporary prostration of the American people. … [T]he part played by the [Jews] in proportion to their numbers in the population is astonishing.”
    Sigh.

  99. Wally says:
    @CoryCalculus007

    Compared to what?

    Tallies where German and Scandinavian IQs are blended in with the much lower IQs of non-German, non-Scandinavians, & non-Europeans that inhabit their countries, yet over rated Ashkenazis cite only Ashkenazi IQs which in reality, when compared real Germans, real Scandinavians is much lower … that’s what.

    If Jews were really so smart they would have conjured up a better, more believable story than their impossibly fake & stupid ’6,000,000 & gas chambers’.

    http://www.codoh.com

    • Replies: @CoreyCalculus
  100. Wally says:
    @SafeNow

    Ebert was right.

    IF S&G weren’t Jews they would have been rightly regarded as mediocre wannabes.
    They certainly would have never got The Graduate gig.

    But ‘That’s Hollywood’.

    Who runs Hollywood & the media?:

    [MORE]

    • Replies: @MisterMick
  101. kapimo says:
    @Per/Norway

    To add to your comment, Babylon is the place where the Old Testament was written (supposedly by Levite priests).

  102. Mulegino1 says:

    A great favor could be done to the innocent Jews were the centers of organized Jew power were destroyed, starting with Hollywood. Seriously, it needs total disestablishment. Tear up the sign, break up the stupid cement stars, and prosecute the executives and studios into oblivion. These institutions represent the very worst and the most putrescent aspects of western society, and they need to be dealt with with all of the forcefulness that the Polish officers were (wrongly and unjustly) dealt with at Katyn.

  103. @MikeatMikedotMike

    No, I was born in 1974. Which makes me Generation X.

    But I have legitimate question and you seem interested enough to answer it-

    1. Why do whites but not Jews suffer the effects of black or Mestizo crime?

    2. Why do whites suffer from drug epidemics like Opoids or Meth?

    3. Why do whites suffer from an out-of-wedlock birth rate far higher than that of Jews or Asians.

    4. Why does the mass media degrade whites more than Jews or Asians?

    5. Why do less whites manage to graduate from college than Jews or Asians by percentage of population?

    6. Why are there not more Jewish whiggers? There are few, but not nearly as many.

    7. Why are whites in rural areas unable to maintain the infrastructure or economies of their towns and cities in the Rustbelt but Jews in Long Island or Los Angeles can?

    • Replies: @Wally
    , @Anon
    , @Anon
    , @Anon
    , @Anon
  104. nsa says:
    @KenH

    “they hate Trump with such passion ”
    Nice try, cuck. Trumpie is a lifelong Democrat from that shtetl on the Hudson, Joo York. The jooies bank rolled his real estate hustles, his various scams like Trump University and Miss Pooniverse, and even set him up with his very own TalmudVision show. The jooies even intermarried with the Trumpies to maintain their firm grip on this most useful of idiots. In short, your guy Trumpstein is a jooie wet dream…….

    • Replies: @Jeff Stryker
    , @KenH
  105. @Ger

    If you deign to make reference to a book it is always good to get the title right and to name the author. In that regard, the book you mention is titled George H. W. Bush, the Unauthorised Biography by Webster Tarpley & Anton Chaitkin (1992).

    On the other hand, perhaps you mean The Family-The Real Story of The Bush Dynasty by Kitty Kelley or Jeb! and the Bush Crime Family by Roger Stone or Family of Secrets-The Bush Dynasty by Russ Baker (2009) American Royalty-The Bush and Clinton Families and the Danger to American Presidency by Matthew Corrigan or How the Bush Family Made Its Fortune from the Nazis by John Loftus or How the Bush Family Wealth is linked to the Jewish Holocaust by Toby Rogers or The Imaculate Deception, The Bush Crime Family Exposed by Russell Bowen. It’s hard to say, isn’t it.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  106. Wally says:
    @Jeff Stryker

    1. Jews do suffer the effects. That’s why they live far away from blacks & Mestizos. That’s one reason why they run to “that shitty little country”.
    2. Ask Lenny Bruce, ask Amy Winehouse.
    3. Jews have huge gay & lesbian numbers, straight Jews are generally unattractive, few women are sexually attracted to their ugliness.
    4. Jews own the mass media, that’s why.
    5. Whites do not get preferential treatment in admissions and in classes, that’s why.
    6. More Jews imitate blacks than whites, just look the ‘Democrats’, just watch CNN or ESPN.
    7. Whites actually are better at maintaining infrastructure. NY & CA infrastructure is a collapsing mess.

    [MORE]

    Please tell us why Jews have they been promoting their ’6,000,000′ lie since at least 1823.

    https://imgur.com/a/0LFFF

    http://balder.org/judea/New-York-Times-Six-Million-Jews-Since-1869.php

    Actually try to tell the truth next time.

  107. @nsa

    Trump did not need Jews, he owned property. However, his father lied to them-comically-and said he was born in Sweden instead of being born in Germany.

  108. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @niteranger

    There’s a clay tablet in the big metropolitan museum in NYC. It’s Sumerian. I remember it because it was a loan agreement and the interest rate was 100 percent.

    Th ancient Greeks were major usurers. Often the collateral was the children wife and the man who borrowed the money. Many Greeks ended up
    as slaves because of that

    • Replies: @Miggle
  109. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @Jeff Stryker

    You sure are bitter aren’t you?

  110. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @Jeff Stryker

    I remember your lengthy comment about how awful rundown filthy and all around shabby Los Angeles is based on a one week visit. So the Jews of LA can’t be doing such a great job of keeping their city up.

    There’s an outbreak of typhus in Los Angeles right now. The Jews haven’t been able to stop that.

    Hispanic immigrant gang MS 13 is all over Jewish Long Island including the Hamptons

    The Bronx was a great heavily Jewish neighborhood 100 years ago. The Jews like everybody else fled when the blacks and Puerto Ricans moved in

  111. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @Jeff Stryker

    You left America 25 years ago. How do you, raised in the slums of Detroit know so much about rural America?

  112. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @LarryS

    Sounds like the Dune books.

  113. @james bacque

    Mr. Bacque
    In the first quarter of ‘Tragedy and Hope’ by Carroll Quigley, there is an explicit account of how the Cliveden Set/British Establishment intentionally provoked the start of both the Boer War and WWI. Quigley’s work is corroborating evidence straight from the CFR archives. Online copies of his work can be found here. http://www.carrollquigley.net/books.htm

    The names of the Society of the Elect can be found in the late pages of the ‘Anglo-American Establishment.’ Rothschild is mentioned there as a central member along with Rhodes and other notable names.

  114. Anon[851] • Disclaimer says:
    @Jeff Stryker

    Stryker,

    I shut down your prior idiocy with a short essay, to which your only limp response was “I’m not a Jew”. Similarly, you’ll again be embarrassed here; as you pursue a similar line of argument.

    Your questions are utterly moronic, and some prior addressed. I surmise that you have an IQ of about 120. Enough to have a large, annoying mouth but not large enough to be able to accurately model the obvious answers to your own questions. Instead, like a lot of such politically entitled people of middling IQ, you seek to constantly burden your unwilling conversation partners with endless repetitive (failed) similar attempts at making cogent points.

    1. The term “Whites”, in its present concept, is a wholly modern invention that is devoid of real sociological meaning as defined through meaningful and active political associations.

    So called “Whites” are a wide range of tribes. Some actively sociopolitically demarcated, some only racially demarcated by haplotype groupings. All behaviorally demarcated, and most often geographically divided.

    Most “white” tribes generally being comprised of a consistent cluster of yDNA haplotype markers. The political and racial-only divisions have significant, if imperfect, sociological intra-tribe overlap and inter-tribe boundaries (political boundaries that are sometimes stated, and sometimes culturally implied – though lower functioning groups tend to have lesser boundaries). Considering both types of boundaries, sociopolitical and racial, the term “Whites” is meaningless except on paper. Anglos are not Scandinavians are not Germans are not Irish are not Poles are not Russians, etc. So, off of the bat, your foundational definitions are too fatally flawed for your rhetorical questions to be taken very seriously. Even so, I’ll ignore this foundational flaw for the moment and answer like you better crafted your rhetoric:

    Jews absolutely suffer the effects of Black and Mestizo crime.

    To think otherwise, especially in an effort to make a rhetorical point, makes you, again, a laughable moron: worthy only of everyone’s ridicule. You either live in a trailer in the deep woods, with no appreciable contact with Jews in their significant territories, or you otherwise intentionally isolate yourself in a more populated environment.

    Either way, your assumption cum argument reveals only your lack of exposure to the real world. I suggest you take a field trip into central Brooklyn and begin interviewing Orthodox Jews on the street to discover whether or not they have a magic Jew shield against minority crime. Me? For a long time I worked with Jews in their businesses in their neighborhoods. I know exactly what occurs there. As for the rest of them, have you controlled for socioeconomic status between Jews and gentiles, and thus what neighborhoods they travel within (and thus the level of crime they are exposed to)? No? Then what are we talking about? You don’t know. I know.

    However, there are regional and political differences between Jews and “Whites” in terms of both defense and response to such crime, and these differences are actively protected by Jewish political interest groups that also lobby against similar protections for Whites.

    So, there’s your first answer as to a difference in defense and outcome that might transcend any study controls that you did not do but should have.

    Examples of defense include the Jewish prerogative to keep neighborhoods 100% Jewish without ACLU outcry or HUD enacted diversity influx. See any recent racial map. By far, the whitest neighborhoods in this nation are South Central Brooklyn and a specific city North of NYC, both close to 100% homogenous Jewish regions.

    An example of Jewish advantaged response, and subsequent deterrence, would be extra severe police crackdown after Jewish victimization but not random white victimization.

    These differences in allowed defense and response outcomes can be viewed as a result of the political influence (strong arming) that arises from a sophisticated internationalism, which in turn arose from the will to create a bred race out of a racial mixture: similar to any dog breed.

    For Scandinavians, for example, to remain truly “White”, they need to stay somewhat genetically isolated and cannot embark in true internationalism. This only makes them politically vulnerable, but not racially or cognitively lesser. A troll is not racially superior because he can better resist sewage. No one is arguing that Jews do not have the most sophisticated political vehicle. I addressed this in my last message to you, which you are now conveniently ignoring.

    2. There are a lot of Jewish drug addicts. Again, you are sheltered or are otherwise are vastly over-stating White drug addiction. In essence, you are selectively noticing both sobriety and addiction, and crafting a synthetic rhetorical point from that fraudulent method.

    3. Which “Whites” are we talking about? Which “Asians” are we talking about? Which “Jews” are we talking about? Have you adjusted your stat for per capita birthrate, or are you merely using total numbers? Where is your data, exactly? How has it been controlled, and where is its validity critique? Show your work.

    4. The MSM is largely Jewish owned / managed, and Jews have a stated interest in attacking and reducing competitive out-groups (via both cultural subversion and political hindrance).

    5. Again, which Whites? Which Asians? Which Jews? How do the numbers hold up when Asians and Jews are observed when they are a majority in a nation? Ie: how have you controlled for an immigrant pre-selection factor? How have you controlled for any State funding factor in any part of an immigrant family’s (ie: Asian) journey from establishment in this nation through to college? How have you controlled for geographic population dispersion in the USA, geography provably being a primary determinant of socioeconomic status? How have you controlled for socioeconomic status? If you haven’t controlled for SES, have you controlled for historical military conscription for families that have been here longer than those of Jews or Asians, many of whom who have had 2-3 generations of men go to fight wars? I could go on. Again, you’re “unperceptive” for a 43 year old. You shouldn’t be gumming up he conversation, but instead perceptive of exactly how much you don’t know. That you aren’t justifies my harsh response to you.

    6. How do you know how many Jewish whiggers there are? How do you know how many gentile White whiggers there are, on a per capita basis? I didn’t know we were able to parse the data on “whiggers”, in the present or more pertinently from the 1990′s when that phenomenon was most significant.

    7. Your dumbest question of the day. I could spend another three paragraphs tearing this to pieces with no hope of you ever rebutting me. I’ll just repeat, with the caveat that you are begging a complicated topic that deserves more attention, that geography is the primary determinant of economic “flow”. Note that you are comparing coastal regions to forested wasteland regions, to start. Stare at a map for Pete’s sake, genius. Figure out how topography, combined with port access, overlays precisely with economic output. Look at the alignment of both median incomes for significant port regions and significant farmland regions. Figure out how to tell the difference between farmland and wasteland, using a satellite map view. Read the history of the regions that you are curious about, and why the people are there (more precisely, why they are there as legacy populations from either an ever improving economic flow or a decline due to the fact that industries have declined). This is not hard, even for someone of your IQ level. It only takes a little bit of curiosity (smart people accurately perceive complexity, dumb people think that topics like economics and infrastructure have simple answers).

    PS: what is “maintenance of an economy”, exactly? No one actively “maintains” an economy. People participate in specific parts of a total economy out of financial motivation (not motivation to “maintain an economy”), and this stretches far beyond Jews in any mentioned region. What you meant to say was “maintain industry”.

    Moreover, for your non-point to have any actual validity, you’d have to show that gentile Whites were not “maintaining an economy” in the productive regions (you can not) and that Jews were doing their part, above the Whites in unproductive regions, to “maintain the economy and infrastructure” (they aren’t, and yes they also exist there).

    Moreover, Whites absolutely “maintain an economy and infrastructure” (to use your terminology) in places like West Virginia. Though, in some parts of that region, which are completely outside of the national economy at this point due to industrial and resource extraction decline, people should be given help and encouraged to relocate to more prosperous regions in their state or out of it. Its very easy for poverty to strand even intelligent people who have been sociopolitically derecinated (deprived of meaningful group help) for whatever reason (Jewish insistence, poverty, dispersion, etc). Last, in no period, have Jews “maintained the infrastructure” of the large cities that they exploited the natural economics of to grow industrial product and control. They have long relied on non-Jews to do that work.

    Your painted portrait of Jewish independent accomplishment is a fabrication, in total. As evidenced by their insistence on remaining embedded in every European gentile society (see the ADL’s recent histrionic protest against Iceland’s attempt to prohibit infant genital mutilation), they absolutely require our civilization maintaining services so that they can be free to harvest the economic fat of that effort.

    • Replies: @Jeff Stryker
    , @renfro
  115. Anon[126] • Disclaimer says:
    @Thomm

    Keep up with what?

    There are no “left wing” and “right wing” economic views. Economic policies are interchangeable tools toward end goals, not end goals in themselves. The prosperity of the true political group, and success over its true enemies, is always the goal of politics.

    We don’t strive for the survival of economic tools, nor do we strive for their elimination (anymore than we prize the hammer over the house, or would throw out a hammer because the nail doesn’t need hammering at the moment).

    We strive for the maximum prosperity of the political group of humans, in contradiction to the interests of its enemies. Period. Politics is not defined through economic interaction, but through modes of human social interaction and cooperation. The latter builds political power, and the former does not and can not.

    To think otherwise, specifically that politics is primarily defined through economics, is to think as a communist thinks. This was his original and continuing proposition.

    It doesn’t matter that you are taking the other side of his paradigm, as his “enemy” (now his unwitting friend) thinking within that paradigm is all that is required for his success.

    You’re another one who doesn’t understand anything that they presume to lecture others in regard to. You’re merely stringing words together that you don’t understand.

    This type of interaction is good for a distraction, and not much else. Its not an actual debate in the sense that there is a subjective quality to this reality that needs to be hashed out. The true national conversation is moving on from a certain set of agreed upon truths. You seem to be in denial over that fact.

    • Replies: @Anon
  116. @mark green

    It’s possible that the Jewish religion may have come from Pharoah Akhenaten, who briefly introduced a monotheistic religion to the Egyptians. After his death, the Egyptians rejected his religion wholesale and went back to their traditional polytheism. But it is possible that a few of his followers remained and formed the foundation of the religion that became Judaism. The reign of Akhenaten is also consistent with the age of. Judaism.

  117. A fascinating article with important quotes I had never read before. Thank you!

  118. Being, myself, more of a Mercurian than an Apollonian, I am happy to acknowledge Jews as having made the world a much more stimulating place but I read the UR anti-Semitic pieces as part of the Jew generated entertainment and diversion that I should apply the same scepticism to that I apply even to the most convincing arguments for the necessity of Israeli snipers shooting Palestinian civilians. I shall probably finish reading this interesting piece but pause to record a couple of problems I see.

    Almost negligible, but the author has tried to associate events concerning Aramaic speaking Roman Palestinians of Hebraic persuasion with events of our times and so I query the assertion that the Jewish revolts of 66-70 AD and 115 and 132 resulted from Claudius’s expulsion of Jews from Rome in 49 AD (all dates are the author’s). A bit of a stretch, no?

    More closely relevant to testing anti-Semitic writing is his flourishing the case of Bernard Baruch. The author seems to be implying something odd, if not sinister, by saying, correctly that Baruch had made a fortune by the age of 30 and then to say he was “young” when he became one of Wilson’s team. Even 108 years later 42 is not “young”.

    Moreover Baruch had a famous physician and medical reformer father and was married to an Episcopalian. His foresight about a European war was not unique to Jews and, if one really needs a Jewish comparative case consider Australia’s greatest general Sir John Monash, like Baruch, the son of Prussian Jews and one who made a professional fortune and prepared himself for war, in his case as a part time soldier in peace time.

    And what’s strange about clever successful people getting close to kings, prime ministers and presidents?

    • Replies: @jilles dykstra
  119. @Anon

    I suspect your IQ is higher than that and you are frustrated at an inability to earn the money you wish to or otherwise get what you desire which has led you to resent Jews. But I digress.

    1. Why aren’t Anglo-Saxons capable of sophisticated internationalism? They used to be, after all they were subjects of an British empire that once ruled the world. But today the descendant of gritty British soldiers and explorers is now an “Afro-Saxon” who acts like a whigger.

    I did not meet proto white trashnationalists until I was out of the Rust-Belt/Northeast but what always struck me about them is that they had no idea of their origins or roots.

    2. “Meth sweeps through the heartland!” blared the headlines of the 1990′s. “Flyover whites dying in droves from Opoids!”. One drug epidemic after another seems to blight white proles.

    No, I don’t deny that a few Jews are drug addicts. Quite a few. But it is not an epidemic sweeping through their population centers.

    3. I can make a blanket statement about East Asians or Jews because they rarely have children out-of-wedlock. Jewish girls are famous for being porn stars but they get pregnant far less often than evangelical Protestants. Of course any Jewish girl who gets pregnant by some worthless whigger of 19 who smokes weed in his Mom’s basement will have an abortion anyhow.

    4. I’ll paraphrase Bronson here. “We couldn’t hire a black or there would be trouble with the NAACP so we hired Jeff Goldblum instead” said Charles Bronson of the making of DEATH WISH…Another words Jews don’t care how they are portrayed and whites do. Do Jews want to imitate Amy Winehouse? Or Andrew Dice Clay?

    Arab Americans do not particularly seem to care how they are portrayed in Hollywood. Nor Japanese in WWII films.

    5. How does geography discourage academic accomplishment? What role DOES geography play?

    6. When the Beastie Boys came out, fewer Jews emulated them than the number of white proles who emulated Eminem. I cannot prove that statistically.

    7. The question was rhetorical. Obviously white proles are unworldly hicks and do not benefit from the financial or cultural trickle-down economics of the coasts that allow even poor Jews or Asians (Or Hispanics) to nibble at the garbage like rats outside 5-star restaurant.

    8. Poverty strands intelligent people. True. I can agree with that. It starts with young and poor parents and a broken home. Einstein goes to a public school. Einstein cannot learn because blacks pummel him. Einstein is smart but ends up in the company of stoners. Einstein graduates from high school but his mother is poor and his parents are divorced and his Dad remarried another woman and started a family with her so Einstein cannot attend college (Though I think I read that Einstein did not attend college anyhow).

    9. Where did I talk about “Jewish accomplishment”? I simply asked why white proles from the rural and semi-rural cities and Podunk regions marry and have kids young and gobble Opoids like guinea pigs fed pills by lab scientists.

  120. @Wizard of Oz

    ” The author seems to be implying something odd, if not sinister, by saying, correctly that Baruch had made a fortune by the age of 30 ”
    Well, read Baruch’s own books on how he made a fortune with Wall Street tricks.
    In my opinion, a crook, proud on what honest people would see as criminal acts.
    Foresaw a world war, indeed, if one is planning a world war it is not difficult to foresee this world war.
    Would there have been a WWII without Bernard Baruch ?
    I’m inclined to say no.

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
  121. KenH says:
    @nsa

    Nice try, cuck.

    You’re not very bright. Cucks don’t savage Jews as much as I do on this thread and many others on Unz. And you’re not paying attention as even though Trump’s a jew stooge regarding Israel the Jewish elites and ((neocons))) hate him since he doesn’t hate white people, dares to criticize illegal aliens and isn’t sufficiently hostile towards Russia who currently sits atop the Jewish shit list next to Syria and Iran. His unpredictability also makes them very nervous.

  122. @refl

    ” The planners of WWI were not out to win a war but to produce the disaster of continental scale that allowed them to rearrange the world. ”

    The treaties Trotzky found in 1917 in the tsarist archives, of before 1914, were between GB, France and the tsar, the object was to carve up the Habsburg and the Ottoman empires between them.
    Hitler and Atatürk prevented the plans to a large extent, Atatürk succeeded in founding Turkey, Hitler resurrected Germany.
    Atatürk especially was a nuisance, extending the Armenian kingdom through the whole of E Anatolia to Syria, then French, failed.
    This is the reason, in my opinion, that Morgenthau sr until far in the thirties made propaganda about the imaginary Armenian genocide.
    A large christian state north of present Syria could have been a great help to the future Israel.
    As to financial interests in Britain
    Alice Teichowa, ‘An economic background to Munich, International business and Chechoslovakia, 1918- 1938′, London 1974
    states ‘in the mid thirties a large part of the Chechoslovakia national income went to Great Britain’.
    The new artificial state had most of the Habsburg’s industries and mines, run by Germans.
    These Germans were gradually removed.

    • Replies: @refl
  123. annamaria says:
    @Michael Kenny

    “He uses uses a mixture of untruths, half-truths, plausible-sounding non sequiturs and juxtaposition of facts to create the impression of a reasoned argument.”
    – Michael Kenny, why don’t you present your refutations, point by point?
    You are know on this forum for your absolute belief in each and all anti-Russian statements coming from the UK, Ukraine and ZUSA.
    So you do trust the incomparable expertise of Eliot Higgins (a college dropout and former salesman of ladies underwear) and Gavin Williamson (a salesman of fireplaces and ceramics) but you are highly critical of an article with extensive bibliography. Perhaps, you need to familiarize yourself with the referenced material before making sensational statements.

  124. @jilles dykstra

    You seem to want to be taken seriously so please consider having the decency and intellectual respect not to misrepresent others points.

    More important on this subject, since you have made clear your distaste for Bernard Baruch, can you give us something substantial about him, like, for example, your implication that he was planning WW1 (which was the one he was quoted as forseeing) and your truly astonishing claim by rhetorical question that he was critical to there being a WW2. The only reasoning I can even imagine is that letters, minutes and diary notes show (a) that Baruch caused the US to cause the UK and France to give guarantees to Poland and (b) that there would not have been a WW2 without that. Is that your crazy sounding case? If, so please substantiate it. If not, what on earth are you talking about?

    • Replies: @jilles dykstra
  125. annamaria says:
    @Thomm

    Just to remind you about the sources of your supposed superior intelligence:

    “There is not a history of Jews building universities in the middle ages…”

    For instance, the modern state of Israel’ intellectual achievements are due, almost totally, to the educational system in Russia. The prominent Jewish scientists of the recent past spoke either German or Hungarian. Often, the prominence was a result of tightly-knit tribal solidarity.

    Here is a Q for you, Thomm: who was the first to derive E=mc^2?

    Here is another Q: Who were the great physicists and mathematicians who have developed the modern physics but whose names were omitted in Albert’s papers? (He was eventually caught, but this has not been popularized by the media, for obvious reasons).

    An excerpt: “Max Born wrote in Physics in My Generation, “It [special relativity theory] gives you the impression of quite a new venture. But that is, of course, not true” (Born, 1956). G. Burniston Brown (1967): “It will be seen that, contrary to popular belief, Einstein played only a minor part in the derivation of the useful formulae in the restricted or special relativity theory, and Whittaker called it the relativity theory of Poincaré and Lorentz… ”

    Max Born: “The striking point is that it contains not a single reference to previous literature” (Born, 1956). He is clearly indicating that the absence of references is abnormal and that, even by early 20th century standards, this is most peculiar, even unprofessional.

    Einstein twisted and turned to avoid plagiarism charges, but these were transparent.
    James MacKaye: “Einstein’s explanation is a dimensional disguise for Lorentz’s… Thus Einstein’s theory is not a denial of, nor an alternative for, that of Lorentz. It is only a duplicate and disguise for it… Einstein continually maintains that the theory of Lorentz is right, only he disagrees with his ‘interpretation’. Is it not clear, therefore, that in this [case], as in other cases Einstein’s theory is merely a disguise for Lorentz’s, the apparent disagreement about ‘interpretation’ being a matter of words only?”

    Poincaré wrote 30 books and over 500 papers on philosophy, mathematics and physics. …
    Einstein’s act of stealing almost the entire body of literature by Lorentz and Poincaré to write his document raised the bar for plagiarism. In the information age, this kind of plagiarism could never be perpetrated indefinitely, yet the physics community has still not set the record straight.”

    http://www.techcounsellor.com/2017/04/albert-einstein-plagiarist-century/

  126. annamaria says:

    By the way, here is a simple explanation to why “the physics’ community has still not set the record straight” re Einstein’s flagrant plagiarism:

    Alan Dersowwitz: “We earned our influence in this country by contributing more to its success than others– so now use your influence! Jews need to use their financial power to punish Israel’s [Jews'] critics.”

    https://mondoweiss.net/2017/05/influence-dershowitz-scarsdale/

  127. S says:

    Back in the USA, Jewish population was rising even faster than in Germany. In 1880 it had roughly 250,000 Jews (0.5%), but by 1900—just 20 years later—the figure was around 1.5 million (1.9%). A census of 1918 showed this number increasing to an astonishing figure of 3 million (2.9%). Their political influence grew commensurately.

    The below is excerpted from a book entitled The New Rome published in the United States in 1853. This book besides accurately forseeing the Jewish mass immigration to the US your article outlines also correctly describes the future formation of the US/UK bloc and its very first act which is to conquer and gain control of Germany, the center of power upon continental Europe. Immediately after this future conquest of Germany the book’s two writers go on to declare that there is to be a titanic global struggle specifically between the United States and Russia, to determine which of these two powers was to dominate Europe, and thus the world.

    So accurate was the 1853 book’s geopolitical forecasts that as early as 1912 it [The New Rome] was being described as ‘a political prophecy’ though one can’t help but wonder if ‘a political plan’ would have been the more accurate description of its contents.

    ‘It is confidently asserted that the Jews contrive to get themselves smuggled out of the Russian Empire, for the purpose of emigrating to the American world.’

    The New Rome (1853) – pg 103 – 105

    “They [the Jewish people] follow a truer instinct in settling in America to enjoy a genuine religious toleration, and an unfeigned equality. Liberty and commerce, the essence of their character, are also the essence of Americanism. It is confidently asserted that the Jews contrive to get themselves smuggled out of the Russian Empire, for the purpose of emigrating to the American world.

    But liberty and commerce, which are the characterisitcs of Judaism and of Americanism, are also those of annexation: every Jew will hasten to claim the protection of the American flag for his operations over the world, and Rothschild will not shut his eyes to the only prospect of enabling the European states to liquidate the debts they owe him.”

    https://majorityrights.com/weblog/comments/the_new_rome_or_the_united_states_of_the_world_1853

    https://archive.org/details/newrome00poes/page/n7

    https://archive.org/details/politicalprophec00goeb/page/n1

  128. Thomm says:
    @annamaria

    er……who are you responding to? I said none of those quotes you attributed to me.

    You don’t even know how to comment here.

    • Replies: @annamaria
  129. Anonymous[392] • Disclaimer says:
    @Thomm

    Thomm is a Hindu National just trolling. Okay no attention to him.

  130. @Wizard of Oz

    You’re a very bad reader.
    I stated that I have no information that jews caused WWI.
    But I am of the opinion that without Baruch there might not have been a WWII.
    As to the guarantees, Britian and France gave them, but not without FDR support, FDR being Baruch’s puppet.
    That he was Baruch himself gives it away in one of his mentioned books.
    Weird how some people are proud of their criminal acts, but as I wrote, Baruch also was proud of his in my opinion criminal Wall Street manipulations.
    That the guarantee to Poland meant nothing, I mention the book
    As to WWII, read a few books, and form your own conclusions:
    Bernard M. Baruch, ‘Die Jahre des Dienens’, München 1962 (The public years, New York, 1960)
    Bernard M. Baruch, Gute 88 Jahre, Autobiographie, München 1963 (New York)
    Charles A. Beard, ‘American Foreign Policy in the Making, 1932 – 1940, A study in responsibilities’, New Haven, 1946
    John T. Flynn, ´The Roosevelt Myth, A critical account of the New Deal and its creator’, New York 1948, 1949
    Sol Bloom, ‘The Autobiography of Sol Bloom’, New York 1948
    Charles A. Beard, ‘President Roosevelt and the coming of the war 1941, A study in appearances and realities’, New Haven, 1948
    Harry Elmer Barnes, ed., ‘Perpetual War for Perpetual Peace, A critical examination of the foreign policy of Franklin Delano Roosevelt and its aftermath’, Caldwell, Idaho, 1953
    Jan Ciechanowski, vormals polnischer Botschafter in den Vereinigten Staaten, ´Vergeblicher Sieg’, Zürich 1948 ( Defeat in Victory, New York, 1947)
    As to letters and minutes, read what Baruch writes about him talking to FDR.
    He was not called by telephone, he sat on a bench where he could see the White House, if FDR wanted to see him a handkerchief was waved.
    How näive are you ?
    Next time you have a comment, please less confused.

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
  131. Miggle says:
    @prefer anon

    In the 1970′s tv documentaries about the Nazi concentration camps, the estimated numbers of Jews killed was not even 1 million. A decade or so later, 3 million. Today, 6 million. Most Americans are deceived into believing that WWll was foremost about Jews.

    Leon Uris writes in Exodus (1958) about one of his fictional characters, the young Jewish girl Karen, who’d escaped Germany:

    Genocide! A dance of death with six million dancers! Karen heard the names of Frank and Mueller and Himmler and [...] She heard the names of [many including] Ilsa Koch, who won infamy by making lampshades out of human tattooed skins, and [...]

    One of my textbooks from a bygone era, Applied Analysis by Cornelius Lanczos (Pitman, 1957), has a dedication page with the words:

    To the Memory of the Six Million
    Who Died for the Kiddush Hashem

    So that number, six million, sprang into life very quickly after the war.

    (If not—as been discussed here before—decades or centuries before the war. It’s possible that it relates to the sudden disappearance of Hellenistic Judaism at an unknown date—all records destroyed apart from fragmentary inscriptions and the like, the Jewish Dark Age—in the early first millennium, after the Roman Empire gave Talmudic rabbis the power of life and death over all Jews of the Empire, which happened about A.D. 200.)

  132. annamaria says:
    @Thomm

    Of course, the quotes do not belong to you. They illustrate what is wrong with the supremacist Jewish thinking.

    • Replies: @CrazedIndiot
  133. MarkinLA says:
    @awry

    I am not discounting that there are a lot of smart Jews – especially in fields where real accomplishment is the main criteria for success.

    The real problem is that the ones who do the most harm to the society they reside in are those in the garbage areas. It isn’t smart Jews in physics, mathematics, or medicine that try to pass laws or provide the bogus “studies” as cover for those laws that cause the damage. I would imagine (given the numerical analysis) that the garbage areas are loaded with Jews who really aren’t all that smart.

  134. MarkinLA says:
    @mark green

    I believe the available records (admittedly not many) of the Hittite Empire also don’t say anything about people leaving Egypt and conquering present day Israel which would definitely be an area of conflict and interest for both empires.

  135. MarkinLA says:
    @SafeNow

    That tells us that he was in fact the “brightest bulb”…in THAT “box.”

    Not really. He is a smart guy but he could also just be a guy who put way more effort into academics than in the social opportunities that were available. This happens all the time in schools. Of course you may define “brightest” different than I do. I have a math background and saw people who could figure out a complex problem in 5 minutes when it took me all day long. If we both turned in our work the next day, I would look just as smart as he did.

    • Replies: @annamaria
  136. @Alfred

    An interesting, additional note here is that the supposed “Exodus” led the Jews to Palestine, which they attacked and conquered.

    As professor Shlomo Sand has shown in his well received books, nothing of the sort happened as Palestine at the time was actually a province under Egyptian control. The supposed wandering Hebrews would have been as mad as hatters had they attacked an Egyptian province no doubt garrisoned with Egyptian forces…

  137. j2 says:
    @annamaria

    annamaria,

    It is not only E=mc2 and special relativity that look like they were plagiarized by Einstein from other researches, all four miraculous year papers and also general relativity seem at least partially stolen from others. I was kind of surprised when I looked into it, but that seems to be the case. I wrote something of it in:

    http://www.pienisalaliittotutkimus.com/2018/02/08/einstein-conspiracy-and-the-exceptional-intelligence/

    • Replies: @annamaria
  138. @Martina

    The consequences were not natural and the development more than destructive. Games are games; some games are rigged.

  139. @ariadna

    Perhaps you can add the war against Napoleon, and certainly many of the European 19th century wars. There is a quote from mamma Rothschild: If my sons did not want wars there would be no wars. Maybe the quote is dubious but the idea,” banker’s wars” certainly seems right.

  140. I have always found Thomas Dalton’s writings very interesting. And despite his thorough sourcing of his essay there are other factors to this period of time that may put Jewish influence into a much lessor position.

    On the one hand, historians Fleming, Meyer, and McMillan, all who have written very well received books on America’s involvement in WWI and the Paris Peace Conference, make no mention of substantial Jewish influence as a primary motivation that drew the US into WWI.

    No doubt there were financial considerations as the author describes in his text. However, how important they were to motivating a US Congress to vote for a move to war in 1917 is still somewhat unclear as even this essay fails to describe how Jewish influence was able to convince so many legislators to enter the war.

    What was actually of import was the massive British propaganda that infested the US media starting in 1914, which was aimed at goading the US into entering into the war.

    Another factor to consider is that Baruch was not as able an administrator of the War Board as the author implies. On the one hand, his financial preparations to send US troops to Europe was an abomination as the 33 training camps designed to train new infantry recruits were so poorly developed that they played a major role in spreading the Spanish Flu among the resident troops in 1918. In addition, the training was so poor as to make US troops completely worthless until the last 4 months of the war. Actual training was performed overseas under the guise of US general Pershing with great assistance from French and British officers and NCOs.

    Another major area of failure with the War Board were the contracts for aviation development, which totaled at the time to around $500,000.00 USD. All of it was wasted to such an extent that Congress opened up an investigation into the matter that remained at the top of the news for quite some time. Baruch may have escaped unscathed from this debacle but it certainly did not demonstrate his abilities to efficiently run such an organization.

    Another factor to consider here, which plays a prominent role in America’s entry into the war, is that Woodrow Wilson was as psychotic as they came who eventually became highly paranoid as well. This was born out by both Fleming and Meyer’s studies, which McMillan does not dispute. Wilson’s psychosis was a result of his traditional southern Christian upbringing under a stern father who imbued in him with a sense of religious messianism. The result was the Wilson believed that if he could shape the world in his image at the eventual peace conference, he would be more than happy to enter the war on the side of the Allies. Allied leaders played up to this fantasy and encouraged Wilson in the fact that he would have such sway over the end results of victory. Of course, none of this happened since Allied leaders saw Wilson as an incompetent boob.

    In fact, Lloyd George once remarked that every time he spoke with Wilson he believed he saw Wilson responding as if he was Jesus Christ himself.

    As a result, Wilson needed absolutely no outside influence to convince him to bring the US into the European war. FDR was a similar character who so hated Germany to such an extent that he would have done anything to get the US into WWII, which he did by goading the Japanese to attack Pearl Harbor. As to his pressures in Churchill, this was nothing compared to British pressures on Poland to drive Germany into a situation that would get here to attack Poland. Poland eventually accomplished this by massacring 5000 Polish-German ethnics at Danzig in September of 1939. Poland has been planning for a war with Germany since 1936 and no matter how Adolph Hitler attempted to avoid this situation by negotiating with Poland on many concessions to Polish interests, the massacre stopped these attempts at once.

    There is no doubt that as this essay points out there were significant attempts by Jews to encourage the US leadership to enter the European war. However, from the complexities and many factors involved, I don’t see it as an overriding consideration.

    I corresponded with Historian Thomas Fleming on this matter and he replied that he found no such emphasis in his research into the Wilson administration. Meyer, never mentions it in his own work, and neither does McMillan. And in my own research in this subject, which I have done quite a bit of over the years, I have also not found much to suggest that Jews were a major factor in bringing the US into WWI. In my review, they played a much lessor role and to a certain extent were merely background noise to the entire event.

    Britain’s promise to the Zionist regarding Palestine, if I remember correctly, was based upon the belief by British leaders that they were going to lose the war at that point and that there was oil in Palestine and later fought over its mandate with France in 1919 in which France instead landed up with Syria where the oil actually was.

    In the United States, Zionist influence among the US Jewish Community was fairly minor and stayed that way all the way up through 1939 as the majority of Jews internationally had no interest in emigrating to Palestine. The reticence was so strong that even during WWII many European Jews wanted to come to America or Canada before even considering Palestine. As a result, when allowed to, a minimal amount did in fact emigrate there forcing Zionists to commit all sorts of fraud and deceit against their own Jewish communities to get them there. And it still goes on today…

    As the author notes, the power of the Jews is quite illusory and is only based upon monies for which even in politics it can get one only so far. In reality, the power of the Jews will be quite fleeting if Humanity ever wakes up to the deceit that has been fostered on them. The problem is that the majority of Humans on this planet are too stupid to see what ails them…

    • Replies: @annamaria
    , @jilles dykstra
  141. BADmejr says:
    @Thomm

    Whether or not Jews have a disproportionate hand in creating degenerate discord in otherwise healthy homogeneous societies is an empirical question that is worth examining. Writing off white nationalist views on the matter as equivalent to blacks blaming whites for their problems is nonsensical if one has truly studied this issue. Funny you should mention that though. Did Jews have a disproportionate hand in stoking racial hatred from blacks to whites? Who created the NAACP back in the early 1900′s? Who coordinated the Civil Rights movement? Who runs the media? These are reasonable questions, and anyone who thinks any serious person would exclaim, “IT’S 100% JEWS!” is simply being disingenuous. Regardless of if one wants to put (a portion of) Jews as the head of the snake, so to speak, or not, there is a “group” that has sown discord throughout history. Take those “outcasts” with chips on their shoulders, and turn them into victim heroes, and you have a group aligned against the “majority.” Start with women, blacks (in the US), then move on to “people of color”, sexually degenerate groups, beginning with standard homosexuals leading all the way to transgenders and eventually pedophiles. Open the borders of all the Western world, and democracy counts for shit for those who built the societies in question. In summary, no one is saying (a portion of) the Jews are the cause of ALL the world’s problems, which is mere hyperbole, but to deny their influence at all, especially to the point of labeling them mere “white people” (which many Jews only do when criticizing whites), is absurd. Spend a few years researching the subject from sources on all sides and get back to me.

  142. @Curmudgeon

    @Curmudgeon

    Sir, I must respectfully disagree.

    “Studying the Talmud and its mental gymnastics to justify Jewish actions, would certainly give them a leg up on the rest of us.”

    The real evidence suggests, rather confirms, that studying the talmud turns the brain to a bowl of shyte! And if continued, will rot the whole body.

  143. @Anonymous

    @Art

    Their true “handbook” is the Torah. 1312 B.C.E. and 1272 B.CE. Talmud didn’t arrive until, year 200 CE.

  144. JamesinNM says:

    After Jesus’ time and the new covenant, the Bible (Romans 2:28 and 29) seems to describe real Jews, God’s chosen, as people, regardless of bloodline, who have accepted Christ as Lord and Savior and have circumcised hearts. On the other hand, Revelation 2:9 and 3:9 appears to describe false Jews, people who claim to be Jews but are not, as the Synagogue of Satan.

  145. @Thomm

    “WN obsession with claiming that Jews are conspiring against them”

    Sure, Shlomo, it’s just a WN conspiracy theory. And jews are totally White.

  146. leeza says:

    Was Hitler right in the end, that they are a very dangerous and powerful race, and that “the world will not know peace as long as jews exist”

  147. @Alfred

    Good comment, but “global warming has nothing to do with humans” is a bit too daringly wrong.

    Humans started affecting climate on a global level about 10,000 years ago, with the slashing and burning of the Agricultural Revolution.

    Intermittent Periods of great volcanic activity contributed largely to global climate change.

    The wobblng of the Earth, the same thing that caused our early human and pre-human anscestors to come out of Africa (the “Africa pump”), every 26000 or 40000 years, i forget, also caused continental clmats to shift.

    We could say, more justly, that global warming is “not only” caused by humans.

  148. @Anonymous

    “So it wasn’t just “Talmud” Jews. It was your Jewish Rabbi “savior.””

    Noooooo! Not the Jesus ?!

  149. annamaria says:
    @MarkinLA

    This “smart guy?” — “Flight Logs Put Clinton, Dershowitz on Pedophile Billionaire’s Sex Jet” http://gawker.com/flight-logs-put-clinton-dershowitz-on-pedophile-billio-1681039971

    “Dershowitz told the American Lawyer, he is loyal to his wife, who is always by his side: “I’ve been married to the same woman for 28 years. She goes with me everywhere. People know that I won’t argue a case or give a speech unless my wife travels with me. This is not the profile of someone who screws around.”

    But according to the flight logs, Dershowitz was close enough to Epstein to have accompanied him on a flight from Palm Beach to New Jersey’s Teterboro Airport as early as December 1997. On that flight, the pair was accompanied by a number of people, including one unidentified “female,” a “Hazel,” a “Claire,” and Maxwell.

    The logs also show Dershowitz on a flight with Epstein from Bedford, Mass., to Teterboro in October 1998, and a flight from Teterboro to Martha’s Vineyard in 1999. And a 2005 trip from Massachusetts to Montreal shows him traveling with Epstein, “Tatianna,” and others.

    One things the logs don’t show: Dershowitz’s wife traveling with him.”

  150. oh man I slogged through the article anyway. and I will do so again to understand it all. the history is great..many details I did not know before

    but I am convinced that the Jews have risen because they are white not real Jews. in the USA they were never targeted as a developing force against the peoples interest. the opposite occurred. same way in England, and France.

    only in Russia did Jewish behavior against the people of the nation bring forth unfortunate violent response which should have been of nature that stopped dead Khazar efforts to organize social control. this did not happen in the west at all which suggests that every elite class in the west agreed with the rise of the Khazars, did not feel threatened by them

    and that is still going on. far from seeing the Khazars as a threat they have all allowed themselves to be subsumed by the Khazars. the rise of the Khazars could not have taken place otherwise

  151. @jilles dykstra

    Thanks for the reading list even if I would prefer you gave yourself more time for clear thinking about what you read. Because….

    No, it is you that is confused, or dishonest, as you logically had to be referring to WW1 when you wrote “Foresaw a war, indeed, if one is planning a world war it is not difficult to foresee this world war”. Why did that have to be a reference to WW1? Because you are replying to my jibe at the author that forseeing a great European war before WW1 was not unique to Jews though I made it unmistakable that I was referring to WW1 by my reference to another son of Prussian Jews General Sir John Monash (who died in 1931). Sorry, slam dunk. But your apology will be accepted if you produce some relevant quotes from that suggestive reading list about BB :-)

    • Replies: @jilles dykstra
  152. annamaria says:
    @j2

    “…all four miraculous year papers and also general relativity seem at least partially stolen from others.”
    —Einstein was not a particularly scrupulous person. To “forget” about Maxwell, Lorentz, and Poincaré was a feat of dishonesty passable only during pre-Internet era. The story of “four miraculous year papers” only confirms the fact of Einstein’s insignificance as a scientist.
    He had the habits of a businessman.

  153. @awry

    Not dumb I think but desperate not to be looked down upon in a community which traditionally honoured learning and cleverness. Some do very dumb things to avoid shame in that demanding social environment. So some peddle soft academic tripe and others get caught out trying to be too clever by half as e.g. lawyers.

  154. Anonymous[486] • Disclaimer says:
    @Thomm

    Smart blacks are also complaining about Jews.

  155. annamaria says:
    @Steve Naidamast

    “The reticence was so strong that even during WWII many European Jews wanted to come to America or Canada before even considering Palestine.”
    – The similar reticence was characteristic for Jewish emigration from the USSR in the 70-s and 80-s, when the “most victimized” strongly preferred Canada and the US to the “next year in Jerusalem,” and tried to avoid the “promised land” by any means.

    “German authorities presented the new restrictions on Jewish immigration to Germany’s two national Jewish organizations last week. As put forth, the restrictions effectively will end the wave of migration that has brought almost 200,000 Jews and their relatives to Germany from the former Soviet Union:” https://forward.com/news/4029/germany-is-moving-to-end-mass-immigration-of-jews/

    “…thousands of young Israelis are moving to Germany:” https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/europe/waves-of-young-israelis-find-a-home-in-the-former-nazi-capital/2014/10/21/7ecd02bf-70fa-4b9f-b226-c4be22049a2f_story.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.5f31884ec875

  156. Allan says:
    @Thomm

    It’s more amazing how obsessed you are with “WN wiggers”, whatever that means.

    So, Thomm, tell us about what motivates you to post your abrasive, abusive, stuff again and again and again. What do you hope to accomplish here? (In addition to saving the whole world from “White Trashionalists”.)

    You have something to teach us now, so please explain also a relevant aspect of your self: If your life is so wonderful, then why are you so angry so often? Are you one of the “WN wiggers” who irritates you so much?

    Here are some recommendations for you to make your life less frustrating: First, accept your little place in the natural hierarchy of being. Attending to your place daily will, in time, cultivate some peace in your CNS.

    Next, look for opportunities to be instructed by your betters. This piece by Thomas Dalton is a good example of such an occasion. It’s evident from a comparison of your writing to Dalton’s that he is, by far, your superior intellectually. I would add that his wisdom, too, is superior. So why not let yourself be improved by associating with him quietly? Why not read his essay, comprehend it, agree quietly with all of its truthful claims, and study its format and style for clues about how to improve your own thinking and writing? Don’t you want to be improved? Don’t you want to be less frustrated?

    • Replies: @Thomm
    , @CrazedIndiot
  157. Allan says:
    @annamaria

    E=mc² is used to indicate rest energy of a mass, but you will encounter also the equation E_tot=γmc².

    E_tot (E with subscript tot for total) is the sum of rest energy plus kinetic energy (E_kin or KE) and γ is gamma, the Lorentz factor. γ=1/✓(1–v²/c²), where v is the relative velocity between inertial frames and c is the speed of light in vacuum. So…

    E_tot = mc² + E_kin = γmc².

    γ becomes very close to 1 if v is very small compared to c, in which case E_tot is very close to mc².

    Ron Unz obtained a physics degree iirc, so probably at one time he knew this stuff backwards and forwards, or well enough to pass midterm and final exams of the classes covering postgalilean relativity. Maybe he wouldn’t mind exploiting this background by publishing a semirigorous piece on the topic of relativity with a history of its development and some comments about the doubt that Einstein was a prime mover responsible for E=mc².

  158. Miggle says:
    @annamaria

    annamaria, I’m stunned!

    Thanks very much for this information, totally new to me.

    You haven’t left ein Stein unturned!

    • Replies: @Wally
  159. @Thomm

    By contrast, White Trashionalists whining about Jews are just broadcasting their own inferiority through this very admission.

    Jews whining about anti-Semites are just broadcasting their own inferiority as well. Mediocrities trying to be somebodies in any way possible and causing all sorts os sh!t in the process. Don’t believe me? Just read the article.

  160. @CoryCalculus007

    If Jews are over-represented, it’s because the Ashkenazim have the highest average IQ in the world.*

    That same group is also famous for telling whoppers. Besides, if they’re so “intelligent,” then one would expect them to come up with ways to avoid being the object of so much “poysekyushun,” or is it intelligent to make bogus claims of such?

    Please answer; there are a lot of dumb goyim who’d like to know. (But keep it simple.)

  161. @annamaria

    Another superb comment! I have long suspected that the hype about him was largely fraudulent.

    He wasn’t all bad tho…he called many of the Zionists “terrorists” which they certainly were and are.

    • Replies: @annamaria
  162. Graukopf says:
    @jilles dykstra

    @Thomm. If the Holocaust didnt happen as Jews say it did (gas chambers etc). Would they have invented it ? Of course they would…..and could!

    • Replies: @jilles dykstra
  163. annamaria says:
    @jacques sheete

    “Einstein remained strongly supportive of unlimited Jewish immigration to Palestine.” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_views_of_Albert_Einstein

  164. 6 Gorillion says: • Website

    Regarding the person of (((Samuel Untermeyer))), I vividly recall this striking passage from The Jewish Threat by Joseph Bendersky about what American military intelligence thought about him:

    One of Van Deman’s major sources in the East, Trevor kept him informed of his work to undermine any effort to admit more German Jews than existing quotas allowed. Discussions with State Department officials, Van Deman was told, had established fundamental agreement with the Coalition on the necessity of resisting mounting pressure from Jewish groups to accommodate refugees.

    Someone in Van Deman’s network wrote a lengthy report on Samuel Untermeyer, a prominent public figure and refugee advocate. This zealous piece of research and surveillance described him as “the lowest type of human that ever lived” (“a reptile”). Untermeyer supposedly exercised enormous “influence . . . on state, national, and international affairs,” especially with regard to “naming co-religionists to key positions in government” such as Louis Brandeis’ appointment to the Supreme Court by President Wilson in 1916. The informant alleged that Untermeyer was “organizing international Jewry for a boycott against Nazi Germany” and was also involved “with pro-Communist activities in America.”

    (page 246)

    This is a must-read book, by the way.

    • Replies: @jilles dykstra
    , @anon
  165. renfro says:
    @Anon

    Don’t waste your time on Jeff.
    He’s a Jew posing as an ex pat and trying to paint whites as ignorant, drug ridden, degenerates.
    He trying to help out his fellow Jews in Hollywood and tv propaganda programing who feature all whites as fat uneducated hicks.

    • Replies: @Jeff Stryker
  166. Wally says:
    @Miggle

    Jew IQ is largely a myth established by marketing and media control, starting with the Einstein brand. The myth is necessary to justify and conceal Jewish tribal nepotism as the main factor establishing dominance of a hostile elite in host nations.

    Exposing the Real Albert Einstein: https://principia-scientific.org/exposing-the-real-albert-einstein

    Albert Einstein was a Fraud: http://coconutrevival.com/?p=5656
    and:
    Einstein, plagiarist of the century: https://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/esp_einstein.htm
    and:

    Jew icon Einstein, like all Zionists, was rabidly racist, xenophobic: https://www.theguardian.com/books/2018/jun/12/einsteins-travel-diaries-reveal-shocking-xenophobia

    • Replies: @Miggle
  167. Thomm says:
    @Allan

    Simple : I do not approve of WN wiggers.

    When White Trashionalists get uppity, they complicate the nature-ordained removal of genetic waste matter from the white race (since they are the wastebaskets designated for removal).

    • Replies: @Jeff Stryker
  168. @6 Gorillion

    Samuel Untermeyer was the chairman of the 1933 world jewish congress in Amsterdam where the jewish declaration of war on Hitler Germany was formulated.
    After this declaration Untermeyer travelled several times to Moscow.
    Those who suspect that already in 1933 Franklin Roosevelt laid the basis for his WWII war, the alliance between FDR, Stalin and Churchill, 1933 was also the year the still secret FDR Churchill correspondence began, suppose it is possible that Untermeyer negotiated with Stalin.
    For those who do not know, 1933 was the year the USA recognised the USSR diplomatically.
    What hardly anyone knows, I suppose, is how this recognition opened the way for export of USA military know how to the USSR.
    Franz Kurowski, ‘Balkenkreuz und Roter Stern, Der Luftkrieg über Russland 1941 – 1944′, 1984, Friedberg

  169. @Wizard of Oz

    You really think that in ‘discussing’ with you I’m going to quote from books ?
    I have better things to do.

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
  170. @Steve Naidamast

    About jewish anti German propaganda in the USA:
    Henry Morgenthau, ‘Ambassador Morgenthau’s Story’, New York, 1918
    Heath W. Lowry, ‘The story behind Ambassador Morgenthau’s Story’, Istanbul 1990

    How the Balfour declaration was blackmailed on Great Britain in order te get USA military support
    Harold L Ickes, ‘The secret diaries of Harold L Ickes, I, The first thousand days’, New York, 1954
    Harold L Ickes, ‘The secret diaries of Harold L Ickes, II, The inside struggle’, New York, 1954
    Harold L Ickes, ‘The secret diaries of Harold L Ickes, III, The lowering clouds’, New York, 1954
    I’m too lazy to look it up, but the 1938 Nye investigation into why the USA entered the war also militarily caused great consternation in Washington when Nye had found the secret diplomatic correspondence about this Balfour declaration.

  171. Anon[415] • Disclaimer says:

    Over time, Jews continued to build a reputation as rabble-rousers and exploiters.

    .

    Let’s assume that to be true. For rabble-rousing and exploitation to take place, there needs to be not only exploiters and rabble-rousers, but also rabble to be roused and people to be exploited.
    Why do the rabble and people end up roused and exploited?

    Have you noticed that all who write this kind of articles always spend all of your words, source quoting, reasoning, on dealing with one of the two sides of an equation?
    Does it look, to you, as the behaviour of truth seekers, or of outperformed rabble rousers and exploiters?

    • Replies: @lavoisier
  172. @Graukopf

    You maybe know that I think it is highly improbable that anything but lice ever was killed in gas chambers.
    This brings us to the question ‘where did the idea of gas chambers for humans come from ?’.
    The idea already existed during WWII, an old relative told me that Dutch underground newpapers reported about gassing humans in the concentration camps, but that they at the time did not believe it.
    Rassinier, if I remember correctly, writes that fellow inmates at Buchenwald or Dora feared using the showers because they dreaded that gas instead of water would appear.
    Yet both Buchenwald and Dora were work camps, the V1 and VII were built there, killing workers in war production does not seem very logical.
    Auschwitz, as Elie Wiesel describes, was a big industrial centre.
    Anne Frank, after having been caught, had to sort batteries.
    So the whole genocide idea is completely at odds with a country desperately short of manpower, because it fought for its existence.
    Peenemünde, the same, the British bombing killed large numbers of foreign workers.
    After some jew who had escaped from a concentration camp in Poland has been smuggled to the USA and told Felix Frankfurter hsi story, what he said exactly I never could find, Frankfurter anwered ‘I do not believe one word of what you’re saying’.
    It may be possible that the gas chamber story was invented in order to make the allies do something about the deportations, ‘simple’ deportation for work not seen as something that would make the allies do something.
    But in fact, I’m merely speculating.

    • Replies: @anarchyst
    , @Anon
  173. skrik says:
    @Mulegino1

    Insofar as the world falls under the malevolent influence of organized Jewry, it becomes ever more hateful, ugly, depraved, violent, impoverished and deformed

    You said it, and more; ‘amazing, incredible, pick your word’ – as to how much we’ve had stolen from us.

    1. Oh, What A Wonderful World – deliberately sabotaged.

    2. Wishin and Hopin – alone won’t/can’t help; hope is hopeless policy.

    Note that Dusty sings [paraphrased] ‘action is required;’ here effective, countervailing action.

    PS I’m reminded of these words:

    “… led directly to 60,000 Americans dead and wounded, God knows how many hundreds of thousands of people in other countries that we’ve killed or wounded or made homeless, and its an ongoing sore
    this is an open wound, and … If Americans ever know, ever know, that Israel did this, they are going to scrub them off this Earth, and they’re not going to give a rat’s ass what the cost is, they are not gonna care”

    rgds

  174. David S. says:

    An excellent piece! Interesting, well-written, and, for a change, well-documented. Many people suspect that this was the case, but few understand the details.

    Dalton does an equally good job analyzing the Holocaust. See his book “Debating the Holocaust” (2015 edition).

    Unz: Publish more by Dalton!

  175. Miggle says:
    @niteranger

    In the Book of Exodus, a few verses after G-hyphen-d’s command, “Do not allow a sorceress to live”, there is the following command:

    If you lend money to one of my people among you who is needy, do not be like a moneylender; charge him no interest.

    (Exodus 22:25) Notice the “one of my people among you.”

    I don’t think that was inspired by the Romans. It goes back to the invention of money by the Sumerians.

  176. Miggle says:
    @Anon

    Please refer us to ancient Greek documents or other sources which give us reason to believe that the ancient Greeks were major usurers.

    All I know about ancient Greek slaves comes from Homer’s Odyssey in which we see that slaves became permanent members of the family. To be treated like a member of a rich man’s family, with secure tenure … I can think of worse things.

    • Replies: @jilles dykstra
    , @Anon
    , @Anon
    , @Anon
  177. anon[228] • Disclaimer says:

    I won’t vote Labour again until he’s gone.
    By Josh Glancy
    1-Mr. Glancy is the New York correspondent for The Sunday Times of London.

    2-Mr. Corbyn has described the constitutionally genocidal Hamas as his “friends.”
    3-He’s appeared on stage with inveterate anti-Semites.
    4- He’s defended a mural that depicted hooknosed bankers running the world.
    5- He’s attended a wreath-laying ceremony that celebrated the perpetrators of the Munich Olympics massacre.
    6 Then, last Thursday, The Daily Mail released a video of Mr. Corbyn speaking at a 2013 conference in London about Britain’s legacy in Palestine. The conference was promoted by the Qassam Brigades, the military wing of Hamas. Other speakers included Stephen Sizer, who has appeared alongside Holocaust deniers at a conference in Iran. So far, so familiar.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/27/opinion/jeremy-corbyn-anti-semitism-labour-britain.html?module=inline

    ( 1 2 3 4 5 are added 0 to focus on the sadness of the lying freaks)

  178. lavoisier says: • Website
    @Anon

    Why do the rabble and people end up roused and exploited?

    This is a very good question and is integral to the ongoing tragedy that the Gentile and the Jew seem to be constantly engaged in.

    Jewish subversion of white gentile societies requires the acquiescence of the Gentile in order to succeed.

    An uncomfortable fact, but a fact still.

    It has never been all about the Jews.

    But they (((Jews))) are quite good at keeping the Gentiles misinformed with their almost total control of the media and now increasing control of the internet.

    • Replies: @Jeff Stryker
  179. @lavoisier

    Why are Jews informed and Gentiles ignorant to begin with?

    • Replies: @lavoisier
    , @Anon
  180. @Thomm

    They are too fecund for to be removed.

  181. @jilles dykstra

    No I don’t though it isn’t significantly more time consuming or technically difficult than delivering your trailer loads of book lists. Of course you avoid the bigger question of your offensively delivered errors – which, coming from an elderly Dutchman, wouldn’t surprise any of my Balinese or other Indonesian friends.

  182. Anon[436] • Disclaimer says:
    @niteranger

    Compound interest a “scam” which the average man doesn’t understand!!? What a depressing thought if true of 21st century America which still claims the right and duty to lead the world.

  183. anarchyst says:
    @jilles dykstra

    There is NOT ONE DOCUMENT outlining any extermination plan for jews or others. In fact, prominent Zionists collaborated with the German government and formulated plans at the highest level of the German government for the transfer of jews to what was then known as Palestine. Absolutely nothing about extermination.

    Official International Red Cross figures for all camp deaths total around 731,000-NOT 6 million. In fact, population totals pre-WW2 and post-WW2 show an INCREASE in the jewish population in post-WW2 Europe immediately after the cessation of the war.

    If a country were hell-bent on genocide, WHY WOULD IT KEEP RECORDS?? WHY would it build camps hundreds (if not thousands) of miles away with sanitary facilities, housing, medical, recreational and other ancillary facilities? Would it not have been easier to just “eliminate” them without going through all of this trouble? Why would they expend massive effort on logistical movement utilizing their limited energy resources if the goal was extermination? Things do not add up.

    [MORE]

    Something BIG stinks in this whole jewish holocaust deal. It is no secret that jewish Zionists made deals with the German government in order to make life uncomfortable for jewish Germans. In fact, it was jewish Zionist leaders who first proposed that all jews wear the yellow Star of David armband so that they could be easily identified. German jews considered themselves Germans first and had no desire to emigrate.

    The establishment of a homeland along with the 6,000,000 figure was a Zionist dream since the 1800s. Many periodicals of the day starting with the 1800s touted the “six-million” figure.

    What better way to encourage emigration to a foreign land than to make things difficult for the cream of German society (jews)?? The TRUTH about the so-called jewish holocaust is out . . .

    As cremation of ONE human body takes hours, the amount of time claimed by holocaust promoters is a physical, scientific and statistical impossibility. Their claims also do not account for the “downtime” that crematoria require for maintenance, etc. In addition, there are no mass burial sites that are commensurate with the claims of “six-million” or even “one-million”. There is also a jewish prohibition on excavation of claimed possible burial sites. WHY?? Because THEY DO NOT EXIST. There is even a prohibition on the use of ground penetrating radar to search for burial sites. WHY?? If millions were gassed and cremated, the activities would have lasted well into the 1950s.

    The so-called jewish holocaust has been turned into a de-facto religion in which no deviation from orthodoxy is permitted. In fact, in most European countries, independent investigation into jewish holocaust truths is strictly forbidden under pain of fines and imprisonment. In the USA, things are not quite as bad, only job loss and personal and professional destruction at the hands of those of the tribe that FEAR the real truth of the jewish holocaust being exposed is evident. A questionable judicial “trick” used in holocaust trials is that of “judicial notice” in which TRUTH CANNOT BE USED AS A DEFENSE OR ENTERED INTO EVIDENCE IN THE KANGAROO COURTS THAT PROSECUTE THOSE WHO DARE TO INVESTIGATE THIS HISTORICAL EVENT. Judicial notice, once invoked against a defendant, disallows the introduction of evidence that does not conform to “commonly accepted beliefs” about the “holocaust ™”, EVEN IF THE EVIDENCE EXPOSES THE HOLOCAUST LIES AND FABRICATIONS THAT CAN EASILY BE DEBUNKED. A question for you holocaust promoters-why are there laws that criminalize the search for truth?? What are you afraid of??

    When the truth about this historical event comes out, it will change much of the world’s perception about those that are using this event as a cash cow that keeps on giving. . . there’s NO business like SHOAH business. Zionist complicity in this event is carefully covered up.

    A good example of present-day censorship is the fate that awaits those that dare question official jewish holocaust orthodoxy. Most European countries have criminalized ANY line of thought that deviates from the official jewish holocaust story. WHY?? In fact, TRUTH is no defense when it comes to all things holocaust. Ask noted WW2 researcher David Irving, who was forced to recant TRUTH in order to avoid punishment.

    The latest vicitms of holocaustianity are Ursula Haverbeck and Monika Schaefer, both 80 plus-year-old grandmothers who have been prosecuted and sentenced to maximum-security prison in Germany for incorrect thoughts.

    If people only knew of the planning that took place (among those of the chosen) to engineer the jewish holocaust, there would be a pogrom of massive size. You see, the jewish holocaust was necessary in order to force the establishment of a jewish state. In this case, the ENDS justified the MEANS. There have been many holocausts of much greater misery throughout human history, yet the jewish holocaust is the only one that counts . . . It is interesting to note that the term holocaust to mean mass extermination was never used during or immediately after WW2, only coming to vogue in the 1960s, when it was noted that guilt could be assigned and reparations could be procured.

    Look at the commercialization of the so-called jewish holocaust while the much larger communist (true) holocaust is conveniently forgotten. To assure a continuing supply of jewish holocaust survivors, jews are tattooing their ATM (oops, I mean camp numbers) on their children and grandchildren. In addition, jewish psychologists have come up with a new concept, and disease-holocaust transference syndrome. You see, children and grandchildren of jewish holocaust survivors are infected with this disease and should also be considered holocaust survivors, eligible for holocaust reparations. According to these jewish psychiatrists, even unrelated individuals can be “infected” with this “malady”.

    Since the Zionist jews declared war on Germany in 1933 (yes, 1933), the Germans had no choice but to complete the Zionist plan of marginalizing German jews (to say the least).. This fulfilled the Zionist plan of forcing German jews to emigrate to Palestine while making the world grant jews a homeland Israel. It is interesting to note that the German boycott of jewish businesses lasted for one day, whil the jewish boycott (actually the jews declaration of war on Germany) started in 1933 and lasted until the summation of WW2.

    Zionists have been predicting a jewish homeland for the last two-hundred years while predicting a holocaust of 6 million for the same amount of time. The ACTUAL number of non-combatant deaths in the European theater of operations is approximately 731,000, NOT 6 million (official International Red Cross figures). The International Red Cross had full access to all of the camps for the duration of the war, yet reported NOT ONE INSTANCE of extermination or mass murder.

    Regarding that holocaust showplace Auschwitz, there are engineering inconsistencies in the design of the so-called gas chambers. The doors are not of a gas-tight design; it would have been impossible to retrieve the bodies, and there is no means to ventilate the rooms after the so-called gassing took place. There is a gas chamber chimney that is not connected to anything. From an engineering standpoint, these are very serious errors that would have caused the deaths of the operators of these supposed gas chambers. As Germans were excellent engineers, it is difficult to observe the glaring engineering errors that presently exist in these camps.

    American execution expert, Fred Leuchter travelled to Auschwitz, surreptitiously obtained samples from the purported gas chambers, had them tested and published his results. The absence of Prussian blue (ferricyanide) in ALL of the samples, save one, was PROOF that the gas chambers did not exist. The one positive sample was taken from a room used to disinfect clothing. In fact, the chimney for the supposed gas chamber does not connect to anything.

    Mr. Leuchter was rewarded for his search for TRUTH with his professional and personal character assassination by those of the tribe. He lost all of his federal and state contracts, and was prosecuted under an obscure Massachusetts law for practicing engineering without a license-a law which had never been used vindictively before or since. . .After his report was published, he was harassed by Israeli “deep state” types (mossad) who he successfully “outed”.

    It is no secret that after WW2, the Soviets attempted to create the death camps for propaganda purposes. Yes, there was extreme deprivation and suffering–many people perished. The prime cause of death was typhus. As allied bombings destroyed most of the infrastructure, typhus was at epidemic levels. THIS is what caused the massive amounts of human deaths . . .NOT gassing.

    It is interesting to note that, before the camps were liberated by the allies, the camp occupants chose to flee with the German troops, rather than be liberated by the Russian allies.

    It is said that the light of day is the best disinfectant in the search for truth Unfortunately this quote does not apply to all things holocaust. It appears that there are those holocaust promoters who are afraid of the TRUTH. Hence the prosecution and incarceration of those who dare question aspects of this historical event.

    I urge all holocaust believers to check these things out for yourselves IF YOU DARE. You will not like what you find.

  184. Anonymous[436] • Disclaimer says:
    @Macon Richardson

    Yep, and you omitted to mention that they are all descended from Jesus’s usurer nephew (who of course didn’t get the God genes).

  185. @anon

    ” He’s attended a wreath-laying ceremony that celebrated the perpetrators of the Munich Olympics massacre. ”
    There were no perpetrators, the jews were killed by clumsy German police.
    Israel invented the perpetrators.
    And yes, Britain’s legacy in Palestine is horrible, even Samuel foresaw this before Israel existed:
    The Rt. Hon. Viscount Samuel. P.C., G.C.B., G.B.E., Hon. D.C.L. (Oxford). Hon. Fellow of Balliol College, Oxford, ‘Memoirs’, London, 1945
    Samuel was the First High Commissioner of the Mandate Palestina.
    A Mandate is temporary government until independence.
    ‘Genocidal Hamas’, what genocide ?

  186. @Miggle

    This did happen to learned Greeks, well documented for the Roman empire.
    Normally, agricultural work, or mines etc
    Michel Rostovtzeff, ‘Geschichte der Alten Welt, zweiter Band, Rom’, Bremen 1961 (The History of the Ancient World)
    Estimates of the yearly slave consumption of the Roman empire go up to ten million a year.
    Recent Pompeï investigations indicate that each villa had some 50 slaves in basement cellars.

    • Replies: @Anon
  187. @Curmudgeon

    Are you a troll? Consideration of the numbers alone makes that comment barking mad. Name a single Jew who was controlling Britain before 1815. (I stipulate 1815 to avoid argument about the Rothschilds which tends to be bad for some UR commenters’ sanity).

    • Replies: @j2
  188. @anarchyst

    No idea why you write this to me.
    Please explain

  189. Anon[436] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anon

    May I put off reading this till you can post the peer reviewed version?

  190. Anon[436] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anon

    That silly amateurish cod history is unworthy of one capable of your better efforts. 1066 to about 1450 the English you write of hardly existed in the context of your conversation with the careless Dutchman. It was Norman French monarrhs and nobility who fought over large chunks of France which they claimed for their families.

    • Replies: @Anon
  191. Anon[436] • Disclaimer says:
    @jilles dykstra

    Sloppy as usual. “Losing Palestine was another fear”!! Before WW1? Really? Think Ottoman empire. And Dreadnought 1916? No, 1906.

  192. lavoisier says: • Website
    @Jeff Stryker

    They control the narrative.

    If Palestinian Arabs owned all the major news organizations, all the major print media, all the Hollywood studios and Google, Facebook, and You Tube, don’t you think the narrative might change??

    Of course it would.

    The tribal monopoly on the media has to be dissolved for the health of Western Civilization.

    And this monopoly is not good for the Jews either.

    • Replies: @Jeff Stryker
  193. Anon[436] • Disclaimer says:
    @anon

    I have, thoroughly and the answer is not there. So, try agaon. But perhaps first you should pay attention to the actual question asked.

  194. @lavoisier

    Why pay attention to the media?

    According to the silly Hollywood films the muggers will be white and Arabs will leap off boats with scimitars if the US did not get mixed up in obscure Arab countries.

    Its nonsense.

  195. j2 says:
    @Wizard of Oz

    “Name a single Jew who was controlling Britain before 1815.”

    Aaron of Lincoln, 12th century, probably had much to say being the richest man. Remember, Robin Hood story is based on loan revolts against usurers, they burned the loan papers and they also burned Jews of York. For sure the usurers supported by kings had quite much power. But at that time the power depended on who was the king, so a Christian king forbid usury and so Jews had to go.

  196. anon[228] • Disclaimer says:
    @anon

    Appearing with terrorist and holocaust deniers. ?So ? Is appearing with Palestine deniers and terrorists like Begin Shamir Sharon or Palestine – Nakba deniers Israeli politicians are human whose presence can be shared in public space.?
    Constitutionally genocidal “- Why ? Is Israel Constitutionally genocidal ? Israel wants to get rid of Palestinians It doesn’t ant 2 state solution It kills to dsiaplce Palestinian and it suffocates and provides minimal food ( diet ) to kill Gazan .

  197. anonymous[404] • Disclaimer says:
    @Jeff Stryker

    Moishe, is that you?

    • Replies: @Jeff Stryker
  198. @j2

    Don’t let Curmudgeon’s nonsense off the hook. His reference to Cromwell meant he was making claims about a period 500 years later than your Aaron of York. Your example anyway pretty well proves the opposite of the proposition that you were trying to defend

    • Replies: @j2
  199. @anonymous

    I’ll never be Jewish and do not want to be. Jews do not make me do anything,

  200. @j2

    And try again on Robin Hood and the Jews whom he (maybe a Saxon lord) could have been consorting with while the French speaking Anglo-Norman Sheriff of Nottingham** tried to take out his money problems on the Jewish community

    https://lethargic-man.livejournal.com/187873.html

    https://boulderjewishnews.org/2013/three-ways-to-enjoy-robin-hood/

    also (maybe)

    http://semiticcontroversies.blogspot.com/2013/02/robin-hood-and-jews.html?m=1

    **he had to look sinister so in one film he was played by Basil Rathbone who acquired the appropriate visage from his Russian Jewish ancestry.

    • Replies: @Anon
  201. anon[228] • Disclaimer says:
    @6 Gorillion

    Untermeyer bankrolled the Schofield and provided him with a visible important secure platform to rewrite the Bible’s focus . We got Evangelicals and Christian Zionist. The sufferings and the distortions ( of Bible) continue today

  202. anon[228] • Disclaimer says:
    @niteranger

    The Jews did not invent usury ( I believe the Romans did)

    Yeah! But Jews exclude themselves from the usury and apply it to the rest .
    That is big of a difference .

    • Replies: @Anon
  203. annamaria says:
    @anon

    anon[228], the passionate invectives against Corbin create a screeching cognitive dissonance because the invectives are completely oblivious of the Jewish State’s crimes.

    If you want to have clarity about Holocaust, stop persecuting people for the honest academic research on the WWII. The Jewish Lobby has been extraordinary active in suppressing the freedom of speech and freedom of information re the academic research. What is so frightening in this research? Is it the possibility of confabulations being the foundation for the extraction of reparations? Or does research
    threatens the Jewish Power’ meme of the “incomparable victimhood” and “superior morality”of the Jews?

    All Israeli prime ministers – up to date — have been violators of international law and Geneva conventions.

    Your righteousness is particularly ridiculous in the context of the ongoing genocidal Wars for Israel in the Middle East and the Jewish Lobby/Israeli support for the revival of nazism in Ukraine. You need to do your research before accusing others of the lack of morals.

  204. Skeptikal says:

    “But those given credit for their successes must also receive blame for their failures. And there are few greater failures in the lives of nations than war.”

    Jews are very happy to take credit for being intellectual leaders in all branches of human endeavour. But any suggestion that their “idea” leadership could have had downsides or even negative goals for anyone is met with the hysterial anti-semitism charge.
    Can’t have it both ways!!

  205. Skeptikal says:

    “By this time, Churchill had been working on behalf of Zionist Jews for some 15 years. He had long counted on Jewish political support, and was rumored to be in the pay of wealthy Zionists.”

    I don’t understand why Churchill would have been working hand in glove with Jews if this is what he thought they were up to.

    • Replies: @jilles dykstra
    , @Sparkon
  206. Miggle says:
    @Wally

    Most Jews are not ‘religious’ so they do not say they are Jews in census questions about religion. They consider themselves Jews nonetheless.

    Why?

    And what does “not religious” mean?

    Most are atheists. Is that what you mean? No belied in the supernatural?

    Do they adhere to the Jewish requirement of not working on the day of the week that commemorates the first day after the six days it took God to create the solar system and the earth’s vegetation and its animals and humans in 4004 BC, even as atheists?

    Do they believe that they are of a Middle-Eastern race, Arabs, even though they look like Europeans?

    On what basis do they “consider themselves Jews nonetheless”?

    Why?

  207. @SolontoCroesus

    Care to provide sources for your so-called “FACTS”?

  208. @Wally

    If not 6 million, then how many, genius?…. Let me guess…. None, right?

  209. Miggle says:
    @Anonymous

    More nonsense from this piece of vermin.

    Not worth a reply except that there have been two earlier … replies.

    See Matthew 20:25, Mark 10:42, Luke 22:25 for Jewish anti-Gentile propaganda.

    They are all the same passage. They say that a Gentile ruler exercises domination over those he rules; but “whosoever wants to be chief among you, let him be your servant”.

    That’s not anti-Gentile propaganda, saying a Gentile ruler rules; and it is not Jewish, but very un-Jewish, sets a moral standard too high for almost all of us, Jews and Gentiles alike. The silly performance of Roman popes, paying people to come and have their feet washed as a ceremony, is very Jewish but very anti-Christ.

    • Replies: @Miggle
  210. Miggle says:
    @Wally

    My apologies. I don’t know that that papal performance of a ruler ceremoniously masquerading as a servant is Jewish performance.

  211. Miggle says:
    @Miggle

    My apologies. I don’t know that that papal performance of a ruler ceremoniously masquerading as a servant is Jewish performance.

  212. anon[111] • Disclaimer says:

    6*10^6
    Then?
    Now?
    No rush.

  213. Miggle says:
    @Wally

    Jew IQ is largely a myth established by marketing and media control, starting with the Einstein brand. The myth is necessary to justify and conceal Jewish tribal nepotism as the main factor establishing dominance of a hostile elite in host nations.

    It’s not Jew IQ, it’s Ashkenazi IQ. The Sephardic Jews of Spain are as dumb is the rest of us. But I’ve seen a report showing Ashkenazi Jews as brighter, and explaining why, which I thought credible.

    • Replies: @j2
  214. Druid says:
    @Thomm

    Fake name. Stupid comments. A true troll!

  215. j2 says:
    @Wizard of Oz

    ” Your example anyway pretty well proves the opposite of the proposition that you were trying to defend.”

    I do not defend any position in unz, you are almost all crazy people here. I noticed your question, took is an honest question: you ask something you do not know, so I answered. But I see you defend a position as a lawyer and do not correctly tell what you know. That is very bad. Not accepted in our culture.

    So I assume you knew Aaron of Lincoln and Aaron of York and the London city Jewish bankers (Sephardic) before Rothschild moved there, I do not remember the names, one was Goldsomething. Then there was Hayyim Samuel Falk, the Ba’al Shem of London, it is difficult to estimate the actual power these Ba’al Shem’s had as Nistarim was a secret society, yet they were connected with well known esoteric people, like Swedenborg, and Nesta Webster certainly saw Falk as one of the secret masters of Rosicrusians, an earlier form of the secret masters of Freemasons, and as the King of Jews. But naturally you know all this and as the wizard you know the actual power Jews had, but prefer to deny everything to support your position. Is this so?

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
  216. @j2

    Well if you must answer reasonably precisely expressed points and questions with an only faintly related ramble round your mind and remembered reading I suppose I should be grateful that it was quite an interesting ramble that prompted me to do some searching for information in a way which does not happen with most of UR’s single minded obsessives.

    You are still letting Curmudgeon off the hook with your smoke screen.

    • Replies: @j2
  217. j2 says:
    @Wizard of Oz

    Wizard said: “You are still letting Curmudgeon off the hook with your smoke screen.”

    OK, Wizard, you refer to this comment from Curmudgeon:
    “Thew Jews have controlled Britain since the traitorous Cromwell accepted his 11 pieces of silver.”

    I of course know this claim, it is very old and not without merits. It derives from Dutch rabbi Menasseh ben Israel. Cromwell approached him for funding, he got funding and Menasseh got Jews accepted to England. The important thing to notice is that Menasseh was a kabbalist and believed (even wrote a book) that the American Indians are a lost tribe of Israel. This is a messianic statement because before the end of the times the tribes should be found in order to return to Israel. It is very correct to connect Menasseh to British Zonism. There is a probable link from British Zionism to Shabbatain Zevi, Shabbatai’s father apparently had trade dealings with the British. British Zionism and Menasseh are the actual predecessors of Zionism as it appears in Freemasonry. As for direct Jewish control of Britain, direct is probably incorrect, but influence is certainly correct.

    Thus, no, I cannot support you, Wizard, on this issue. You many not know enough of this particular question. There was the birth of British Zionism appearing then in revolutionary Freemasonry as Zionism and Zionism always had the goal of world rule, as that is the prophesy. Cromwell did play a role in letting Jews to England and he did get funding from them. The question is not black and white, but Curmudgeon is not more wrong than you are, rather the opposite.

  218. @Skeptikal

    At the end of the twenties Churchill’s political career seemed over.
    In 1928 or 1929 he told his friend Bernard Baruch that he wanted to go into business, Baruch said that he saw great things for Churchill in the future.
    The FDR Churchill correspondence, still largely secret, began in 1933.
    Around 1937 Churchill became openly pro war.
    He greatly exagerrated Germany’s military strength, especially aircraft, the official who gave him his information committed suicide.
    When war became imminent Churchill entered the cabinet.
    How Churchill loved war and was stupid militarily one can read in
    Colonel Roderick Macleod, D.S.O., M.C., and Dennis Kelly, ‘TIME UNGUARDED The Ironside Diaries 1937- 1940′, New York, 1963
    How stupid he was politically one reads in
    Francois Kersaudy, ´De Gaulle et Roosevelt, Le duel au sommet’, Paris, 2004
    John Charmley, ‘Der Untergang des Britischen Empires, Roosevelt – Churchill und Amerikas Weg zur Weltmacht’, Graz 2005
    John Charmley,’Churchill’s Grand Alliance, A provocative reassessment of the “Special relationship” between England and the U.S. from 1940 to 1957’, 1995, London

  219. refl says:
    @jilles dykstra

    Carving up the defeated empires between Britain, France and Russia was negotiated between the Entente powers certainly. Only, that Russia was to be overthrown before ever cashing in on their sacrifice and France was being doublecrossed with the Balfour declaration. The planners were out on anglosaxon domination with the Zionists as fellow travellers.
    Regarding WWII Germany was set up against the Sowjets to finish the job (to destroy christian Europe and above all destroying Germany itself and to smoke out the Jews to populate the zionist hobbyhorse). Stupidly, Germany just had to crush France first to be free for its struggle in the east. At that point clearly British and French interests collided.

    • Replies: @jilles dykstra
  220. Sparkon says:
    @Skeptikal

    I don’t understand why Churchill would have been working hand in glove with Jews if this is what he thought they were up to.

    The drunken, dissolute warmonger Winston Churchill was in debt up to his ears by 1938 from drinking, gambling, and maintaining a lavish lifestyle. He was an easy mark. His debts were eased and absolved by mysterious and not-so-mysterious benefactors, although his financial problems would continue throughout the war, but Churchill had been in the pocket of the Jews and Zionists since at least the aftermath of WWI.

    In 1920 Churchill declared “if, as may well happen, there should be created in our own lifetime by the banks of the Jordan a Jewish State under the protection of the British Crown which might comprise three or four millions of Jews, an event will have occurred in the history of the world which would from every point of view be beneficial”.

    https://crimesofbritain.com/2016/09/13/the-trial-of-winston-churchill/

    As we know, he who pays the piper also calls the tune, but even before Churchill sold out, he was an evil man:

    Secrecy was paramount. Britain’s imperial general staff knew there would be outrage if it became known that the government was intending to use its secret stockpile of chemical weapons. But Winston Churchill, then secretary of state for war, brushed aside their concerns. As a long-term advocate of chemical warfare, he was determined to use them against the Russian Bolsheviks. In the summer of 1919, 94 years before the devastating strike in Syria [sic], Churchill planned and executed a sustained chemical attack on northern Russia.
    [...]
    Trials at Porton suggested that it was indeed a terrible new weapon. Uncontrollable vomiting, coughing up blood and instant, crippling fatigue were the most common reactions.

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/shortcuts/2013/sep/01/winston-churchill-shocking-use-chemical-weapons

    Churchill not only gassed the Russians, but also he gassed his own people too.

  221. @Sparkon

    I miss that Churchill used poison gas in Damascus in 1918, to destroy the Arab state promised by Lawrence for the important Arab help in the war, and defended the use in parliament
    Churchill also was the man who saw no problem using phosphorus bombs on civilians in WWII.

  222. @refl

    Intentions at present are difficult to know, intentions long ago even more difficult.
    On top of that, intentions do change during conflicts.

    ” France was being doublecrossed with the Balfour declaration. The planners were out on anglosaxon domination with the Zionists as fellow travellers. ”
    This indeed seems probable.

  223. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @j2

    Didn’t Aaron of York organize the Jewish ursurers to raise the money to ransom English king Richard 1 from Holy Roman Emperor Henry 6?

  224. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @Curmudgeon

    The Prince of Orange William who overthrew James 2 and became William 3 of England was backed by the Jewish Amsterdam bankers.

  225. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anon

    The English Royals had legitimate heriditary claims to about 45% of France thru William of Normandy Fulk of Anjou Eleanor of Aquitaine and Margaret of Anjou it is true.

    But even in the 12th century they were constantly allying and breaking alliances with the Duchy of Burgundy and whoever else ruled the Netherlands the Papacy Sicily Spain and the Empire. The purpose was to foment war so the English could sail across the sea and raid the continent for loot. Another reason was to unite the anarchic warlord nobility to wage war across the sea instead of at home.

    As N Germany emerged the English messed around there too. The rise of Prussia from an obscure Marquisate to a Kingdom was largely an English foreign service operation

    WWs 1 and 2 were the culmination of 800 years of English foreign policy.

    • Replies: @Anon
  226. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @j2

    The Robin Hood I read revolted against Catholic Abbots of rich monasteries and the Sheriff of Nottingham. He was based on outlaws who lived off the land in the woods.

    I doubt any money lender would lend them money. Jewish money lenders of the time lent money to people who had collateral. 133% interest rates was standard except for the Catholic Templar Monks who charged as much as 400% interest rates.

    Obviously no economy could tolerate those rates. So the money lenders made money when they could and then got out of town when the King Count Bishop whatever ruler authorized an uprising and expulsion

    • Replies: @j2
  227. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @anon

    The ancient Greeks had usury. Often the only collateral was the bodies of the debtor his wife and children who were sold as slaves when the debt couldn’t be paid.

    There’s a clay tablet in the big metropolitan museum in NYC It’s Sumerian. It’s a loan contract. I remember it because the interest rate is 100%.

    Those points and fees debtors have to pay to get a mortgage are usury in my opinion because they are usually added on to the mortgage instead of being paid in cash. So what’s $5,000 in points and fees interest paid over 30 years ? Husband insisted in paying the pionts and fees of our mortgage in cash. Banker had a fit.

    • Replies: @MarkinLA
  228. JMcG says:
    @Sparkon

    See David Lough’s “No More Champagne” for a great examination of Churchill’s finances throughout his life. It was eye opening.

  229. j2 says:
    @Anon

    The legend of Robin Hood has many sources, old legends of the Green men and so on, I referred to one possible origin of the legendary robber, which involved taking the loan papers and burning them, thus taking from the rich and giving to the poor. I am not sure if it was Richard Malebisse or someone else. Of Richard Malebisse there is this in Wikipedia or the York massacre:

    “The incident was provoked by Richard de Malbis (Richard Malebisse), who was in considerable debt to Aaron of Lincoln. When a fire accidentally broke out in the city on 16 March 1190, de Malbis used the opportunity to incite a mob to attack the home of Benedict of York, the recently deceased agent of Aaron of Lincoln, killing his widow and children and burning the house.”

    It may have been another person, I remember it was a noble man who had lost his castle to usurers while in the Crusade. And usurers may well have collected a ransom for Richard I, but for sure that gave them some power also. Jews had power in England before they were expelled, and they had power after they were readmitted. Money has power, no denying that.

    • Replies: @Anon
  230. j2 says:
    @Miggle

    “But I’ve seen a report showing Ashkenazi Jews as brighter, and explaining why, which I thought credible.”

    It is cultural, not genetic. Better education raises IQ. Higher social class gets a higher IQ in tests regardless of their genetic intelligence. Ashkenazi Jews in Israel are in the European IQ level. But I am starting to be very skeptical of the high IQ of American Ashkenazi. One American Jewish researcher just a few days ago sent me his paper and asked me to read it. He had a really elementary error that destroyed the whole argument of the paper. I explained it to him seven times with very simple examples, but he still could not understand it. He’s IQ could not have been even 110, which is very low in research, yet he was a researcher in the USA. I wonder if he was unique.

    • Replies: @anarchyst
  231. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @Miggle

    To hell with you a$$hole. How dare you? Who do you think you are? My thesis advisor? I’m not running to the nearest university library to prove my information against your ignorance .

    Nor am I going to spend time and effort searching the internet for the information. You don’t believe me? I certainly don’t care what you or any other ignorant prole thinks. .

    Nor am I going to fly to NYC and stay there to look for the loan contract Sumerian tablets

  232. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @Miggle

    There’s more to Greek history than the Iliad and Odyessey you ignorant prole.
    And there’s a lot more to Greek history than what you’ll find on the internet.

    • Replies: @Miggle
  233. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @Jeff Stryker

    You’re the ignorant gentile with your nonsensical posts about early married White drug addicts on welfare

    Your alleged expertise about degenerate deprived Whites on welfare contradicts your claim to have lived your entire life since college abroad.

    Then there’s your inserting your derogatory comments about Whites in every thread no matter how irrelevant the condition of Whites is to the article.

    What’s your purpose? Most of the commenters seem to be prosperous middle and upper middle class science educated tech and engineering men. They don’t know any welfare Whites.

    Life in the slums of Detroit is as foreign to us as life in a Highland El Salvador tribal village

    • Replies: @Jeff Stryker
  234. lavoisier says: • Website
    @Sparkon

    But Winston Churchill, then secretary of state for war, brushed aside their concerns. As a long-term advocate of chemical warfare, he was determined to use them against the Russian Bolsheviks.

    This is a bit confusing. If Churchill was owned by the Jews, why on Earth would he have wanted to gas the Russian Bolsheviks??

    I thought the two terms applied to the same people???

    • Replies: @Anon
    , @Sparkon
    , @anon
  235. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @jilles dykstra

    Thank you Jilles

  236. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @lavoisier

    That was in 1919 when Churchill was anti Bolshevik. The English Jews who gave him money later on were not Bolsheviks.

  237. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @j2

    You’re right I’m sure. I just read the book when I was a kid. There was a Robin Hood TV series too. Excellent. It was based on the standard book.

  238. Josecanuc says:
    @annamaria

    Josecanuc @ annamaria
    “I want to say something about the Universe. There’s God, angels, planets… and horse shit.”
    Zero Mostel

    That’s what Richard Moody Jr’s article on Einstein is ….. pure horse shit… ridiculous and a waste of time…. it is analogous to a rogue ‘Prosecutor’ who is trying to ‘prove’ to a jury of ignorant naive fools that Einstein is a charlatan and is guilty of ‘plagiarism’… even though the truth – reality – ‘the literature’ is so overwhelming contradictorily to the accusation… that the article is pointless and asinine.

    Not only contrary to the tons of ‘literature but also absurd because, unlike academia and scientists today, the leading scientists and physicists ‘back then’ – Einstein’s colleagues – would never have endorsed and awarded a counterfeit plagiarising charlatan for the Nobel Prize ….let alone become his life long friends.

    Also pointless and senseless is your attempt to challenge what you characterize as the “supposed superior intelligence” of the Jews…. by utilizing Richard Muddy Jr’s inane falsified distorted article to impute a famous Jew – Einstein’s honesty, integrity and the legitimacy…

    Bickering about the Jew’s ‘supposed superior intelligence’ is senseless and pointless too… because evidence in reality and in harmony with ‘experience’.. (reality)

    ( “…they are logical, quantitatively…(and) in harmony with experience’…Einstein on Newton’s theorems )

    And attempting to dispute the Jew’s ‘superior intelligence’ is analogous with the Jew’s efforts to refute the legitimacy of Protocols of Elders of Zion… calling them counterfeit invented…… ‘a blood libel’…
    Even though the Protocols too are ‘evident and in harmony with experience’ i.e., reality.

    Einstein: “What has perhaps been overlooked is the irrational, the inconsistent – even the insane, which nature, inexhaustibly operative, implants in an individual, seemingly for her own amusement.”

    This is what has been overlooked – the fact that: “The whole world is mentally ill, much more so we Jews.” Arthur Ruppin, Zionist, sociologist one of founders of Tel Aviv, 1939

    That is the tree you should ‘bark up’ (so to speak). Maybe you can coerce them to ‘come down to earth from their holy ‘chosen irrational supremacy’…and ‘Stop being Jews and start being human beings.’ (GB Shaw)

    You will find that it will be much more easier to prove that they are irrational and delusional – (dangerously so) than trying to disprove their ‘intellectual superiority inasmuch as ‘it’ – their dementia is just as conspicuous, logical, quantitatively…and in harmony with experience’ too

    • Replies: @annamaria
  239. Anon[436] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anon

    I try to keep up with the jargon required by the people e.g. who push Ian Buruma out of the NYRB and I think you have committed the left-intellectual sin of denying “agency” to all those poor Continentals oppressed by the “English foreign service”. Who was who genetically and ethnically? I suspect Hanoverian, and maybe the Hohenzollerns’ Brandenburgers had a lot in common with the ex-Viking Normans who gave so much flavour to what came to be proudly proclaimed as English.

  240. anarchyst says:
    @j2

    Not only is it cultural, it is nepotism and insularity that is at the forefront and assures jewish “success”.
    You see, jews are more likely to accept a marginal jewish individual than a highly intellectually gifted “goyim”.
    Blood is indeed thicker than water.
    It is curious to note that jews promote insularity, clannishness and other “networking” schemes for themselves, but do their damnedest to discourage such behavior by “goy”.
    Sorta tells you something…

    • Replies: @j2
  241. @j2

    As I don’t share your fascination with Freemasonry I will leave that aside but go straight to the heart of the support you give to Curmudgeon. Please give any pre Rothschild example of weighty Jewish influence on important British foreign or domestic policies between the 1650s and 1815 – or, if you like, right up to the Rothschild financing of the British government’s purchase of shares in the Suez Canal company. They couldn’t even get elected to Parliament until 20 years after Catholics could be!

  242. annamaria says:
    @Josecanuc

    “…a famous Jew – Einstein’s honesty, integrity and the legitimacy…”

    – If you insist: http://www.pienisalaliittotutkimus.com/2018/02/08/einstein-conspiracy-and-the-exceptional-intelligence/

    “Einstein’s fame is based on two sets of four articles each. The first set was published in 1905, the miraculous year. These four articles deal each with a different topic: explaining photoelectric effect, explaining Brownian motion, formulating the theory of special relativity and the last presents the famous formula E = mc2.

    This formula was known to many others, including Henry Poincaré, but it is also presented in an article published by Olinto De Pretto in 1903 in a scientific magazine and republished in 1904 in 1904 by Veneto’s Royal Science Institute. Certainly these, especially the last one, count as scientific publications. They predate Einstein’s article from 1905. It is indeed possible that Einstein had obtained the result of De Pretto before writing his 1905 article. Einstein could read Italian and he had connections there having lived in Italy with his parents.”

    More on the same:

    “Einstein, Freud and Marx were all famous and once considered geniuses, Einstein still being thought so, the other two maybe not. Einstein also got a Nobel Prize. The real Einstein conspiracy is not the claim that Einstein maybe stole or plagiarized results, but that Einstein has been used to promote a claim that the high number of Jews among Nobel laureates is a proof and a result of the higher IQ of Jews. This is actually a myth…”

    “It is true that Lorentz, a Nobel Prize winner, published the equations of relative motion a year before Einstein.”

    “Though no one thinks Einstein confected special relativity out of thin air, his 1905 paper had no notes or references, which was odd even for the times.”

    • Replies: @Josecanuc
  243. Anon[436] • Disclaimer says:
    @Sparkon

    Dishonest professional historians are bad enough but you amateurs of anachronism are irritating time wasters on social media like UR threads. Even your prima facie relatively respectable link is written by some wet-behind-the-ears lefty journo who doesn’t realise that when the Germans started the use of poison gas and the French and British responded in kind it was not illegal under any kind of international law. Same goes for anything used under Churchill in WW2. So, why wasn’t it a good thing for Churchill to advocate circa 1919-21, logically and humanely, that gas should be used which would make people vomit and pass out rather than artillery which would blow them to pieces?

  244. Anon[436] • Disclaimer says:
    @jilles dykstra

    You don’t appear to be fundamentally stupid so you are apparently being disingenuous in seeking to make the ridiculous point that the Nazis wouldn’t have killed thousands of Jews by gassing them or other convenient method because of their labour shortage. It has only ever been suggested that those gassed were those judged unable to work, plus some mothers in order to be able to kill their children without too much fuss.

    • Replies: @jilles dykstra
  245. Good read. Like I’ve said before, we can look at recent events/wars to help us understand the past ones better. When history is written by the “winners” theres lots of disinfo and propaganda to dig through.
    Its clear that the “neocons” and Israeli leaders are the ones pushing for war these days, Netanyahu just can’t quit foaming at the mouth over killing.
    Remember what Bibi told us in 2002?
    “If you take out Saddam’s Regime, I guarantee you, that it will have enormous positive reverberations on the region.”
    How long has he been pushing for American goyim to die turning Iran into another Iraq or Libya?
    Its pretty clear who is pushing forr war. Along with the war profiteers, the MIC, Wall St. Its not to hard to figure out.
    Heres what the results are in Iraq, so called Christians like Bush and Pence should be proud.

    In an interview with Catholic News Service, Chaldean Archbishop Habib Nafali of Basra, Iraq said there were now so few Christians in his country that the church there would disappear if it was subjected to further persecution.
    “There is a global game, and the peaceful people — the minorities — in the end will be the ones who are destroyed,” he said.

    He said he was fearful of renewed persecution because he believed the Islamic State terror group had not been defeated, but had gone underground.

    He said Iraq’s Christians had suffered “systematic violence” intended to uproot and eradicate them, to “destroy their language, to break up their families and push them to leave Iraq.”

    “If this is not genocide, then what is genocide?” he asked.

    Christians have lived in what was known as Mesopotamia since the time of the apostles and speak Aramaic, the language of Jesus. But the archbishop said their number has plunged from 1.5 million to just 250,000 in the last 15 years, and they now represent about 1 percent of the population, compared to 6 percent a century ago.

    In the decade that followed the 2003 U.S.-led invasion of Iraq, a church or a monastery was destroyed every 40 days on average, the archbishop said.

    http://catholicphilly.com/2018/10/news/world-news/iraqi-archbishop-fears-more-persecution-says-is-went-underground/

    Give yourselves a pat on the back, “Christians” of America, keep worshiping the fake Jews and so called state of Israel.

    • Replies: @Skeptikal
  246. @j2

    You many not know enough of this particular question.

    That has never previously stopped the Wiz from spewing his own style of dim propaganda.

  247. @Anon

    According to the posts I’ve read Jews have tremendous advantages in US society over the average white.

    What are those advantages?

    How are Jews affecting average whites. Bad Hollywood films? Taxes? Porno?

    Why would so many average middle-class whites be preoccupied with them?

    • Replies: @CrazedIndiot
    , @Anon
  248. The Armenian Genocide (the wholesale murder of a race of Christians in Ottoman Turkey) was planned and orchestrated by the Young Turks comprised of the crypto Jews and the above referenced Domn Jews from Salonika. Herzl did his best to suppress any publications of this holocaust to endear himself and his dark zionist cause to the chief architect of the Genocide Talaat Bey with the hope of getting the butt crumbs from the young Turks at the end of the war.

    Indeed to date, the Israelis do not recognize the Armenian Genocide to their shame, but ultimately they have no shame nor could care less what the rest of humanity thinks about them.

    Blackmail, murder, extortion, sexual entrapment, false flags, fake creeds, absence of loyalties all characterize their operating system which is derived from a Talmudic Khazar ruthless and violent sense of supremancy over the rest of mankind.

    “[T]he part played by the [Jews] in proportion to their numbers in the population is astonishing.”

    Their power is acquired through control of the currency and their usury and the (dis)information that is disseminated through the ether. Indeed reading this excellent article leads one to conclude that nothing has changed in this regard over hundreds of years.

    Indeed, it goes beyond astonishing. It is inexplicable other than to understand that it is a battle in the spiritual dimension and they are empowered and enabled by the enemy of God the Creator and his Christ. This slanderer would that all human life be extinguished unless it bows the knee. Indeed is he not working to that end quickly as we sit here dumbfounded and perplexed?

    • Replies: @jilles dykstra
  249. j2 says:
    @anarchyst

    “Not only is it cultural, it is nepotism and insularity that is at the forefront and assures jewish “success”.”

    The Ashkenazi Jews of the USA get a verbal IQ average 108 in WORDSUM. This is a vocabulary test and reflects better education and that they use in their culture language where the rare words asked in the test appear. Verbal IQ and arithmetic IQ (tested by the series) are highly culture dependent, and as Ashkenazi Jews have visuo-spatial IQ below 100, I think they are genetically a bit under 100, as is logical for a 60%, 40% mixture of Southern European and Middle East.

    As for nepotism, using the measured average IQ of 110 for Jews and 100 for Europeans, I calculated that Jews over IQ 150 have ten times higher probability of getting a Nobel Prize compared to Europeans with IQ over 150. As IQ is equalized in this comparison, the reasons are: supporting own candidates for the prize, taking over prestigious university professorships, favoring own authors in acceptance for publications and so on. There is a strong Jewish effort to explain that the result is caused by a higher IQ, but nothing points to that direction. If we compare the number of men with IQ over 150 and women with the IQ over 150 (4 point difference in average IQ and a small difference in the standard deviation) we notice that men are 8 times more likely to get a Nobel Prize than equally intelligent women. Nobody claims this difference is caused by intelligence, as IQ is equalized. It is mostly caused by different interests of men and women, but with Ashkenazi Jewish men and European men the interests are the same, so it must be caused by favoring of some kind.

  250. @Anon

    Even Anne Frank had to work, sorting batteries.
    As you maybe know she died of typhoid, Zyklon B for delousing clothes no longer available, transport breakdown.

  251. @General Koofta

    I’m tired of explaining that there never was an Armenian genocide, a Morgenthau propaganda invention
    Henry Morgenthau, ‘Ambassador Morgenthau’s Story’, New York, 1918
    Heath W. Lowry, ‘The story behind Ambassador Morgenthau’s Story’, Istanbul 1990

    • Replies: @Miggle
  252. Sparkon says:
    @lavoisier

    Many Bolsheviks were Jews but not all Jews were Bolsheviks. Some played both sides against the middle. and in the end, many Russian Jews were just chopped liver.

    The Western Allies intervened in Russia on the side of the Whites during the Russian Civil War, and only a cynic would claim that is why the Whites lost. But at least Churchill and the British got to gas some hated Bolsheviks, perhaps as a scolding for concluding a separate peace with the hated Germans!

    The decisive force in the Russian Civil War was the Red Army, which was created and commanded by Lenin’s right-hand man Leon Trotsky, who not so long before had been cruising around New York City in a chauffeured limousine placed at his service by a wealthy friend, so maybe the decisive force in the Russian Civil War was really the Gold Army.

    It seems Big Money favored the Reds in Russia after WWI in the same way Big Money favored the Reds in China after WWII.

  253. @Allan

    Why are you wasting time debating an obvious Indian (dot) who thinks the whole world, starting with the good ol USA must bow down to the mighty indian (troll)

    He is well known around here as a subcontinental, most likely a hindoo, larping as a white american. He has visceral hatred for whites and wants to flood the nation with his co-ethnics from India. These Indians are hard core hindoo nationalists in India, however the moment Air India touches the tarmac at JFK or LAX, they turn into bleeding heart liberals. I wonder if it’s the jet lag??

  254. @Jeff Stryker

    Perhaps they can start with instructing their co-ethnics to not paint us all like nazis? To not ALWAYS blame every god damn thing on whites?

    Most of us here are men of science (as far as I can discern). Despite the obvious help that the Indian gets from (((them))), to render us jobless and hopeless, we’ve still managed to survive although the going is getting tough

    None of us are on welfare and definitely not on hard core drugs. You on the other hand, are an obvious troll. You got banned from Robert lindsay’s website because you almost always derailed every meaningful discussion with your constant filth about whiggers and porn. You are better off in Asia with your poontang girlfriend. ANy which ways you are celebrating the destruction of whitey from a safe distance, what do you have to worry about.

    Meanwhile (((they))) are constantly pushing ever more illegal immigrants turning every city into el paso and miami. (((They))) are also constantly begging the government for ever more Asian Indians to displace the better off whites, who never did drugs or worked hard for their jobs. You are an obvious disgrace to whites (if you ever are one), however (((they))) really like what you are doing here. DOn’t worry, this is not RL’s blog and your shit would be called every now and then

  255. @annamaria

    Hay Anna

    I love your writings here. I love how you get angry when someone makes sweeping generalizations about Russia or the middle east. Well, I’ve got a special place in my heart for head strong and upright women from Russia and the mid east. Thank you for your effort and may the good lord bless you

    Coming back to Thomm here, he is NOT a jew. He is too full of himself and never misses an opportunity to remind us lowly whites how Indians (dot) rule the roost in the US now (“muh skillz”, “muh coes”, “look how much money we make”). He constantly reminds us how we all are “wiggers”. How we must be thankful he and his brethren from India are flooding our shores like never before and how much that’ll help our economy. A jew certainly has a lot more chutzpah than this but he is a lot more discreet.

    In my not too meaningful (until now) life, the only people who seem to be so puffed up about India (combined with a sense of entitlement and scornful disdain for the “lower whites”) are Asian Indians in the US.

    Most likely from the virtue signalling west coast cities where they’ve gotten fat on the sweat of naive white industry veterans who foolishly invited them over for a “little fix up” at the turn of the century. Now these very veterans have been thrown out of their industry and replaced by these gas lighting morons like thomm here.

  256. MarkinLA says:
    @Anon

    Those points and fees debtors have to pay to get a mortgage are usury in my opinion because they are usually added on to the mortgage instead of being paid in cash. So what’s $5,000 in points and fees interest paid over 30 years ? Husband insisted in paying the pionts and fees of our mortgage in cash. Banker had a fit.

    They are usually added because, if they don’t, the borrower won’t quality. There is no rule that they be part of the loan as your husband paying them upfront shows. This is no differenent than paying a larger down payment. The selling point to the borrower is that in a place like California, what is an extra 5000 dollars on a 500,000 dollar mortgage?

    The real question is if these fees have any actual relation to the true cost of preparing, documenting, and recording the loan?

  257. @CrazedIndiot

    In a way I am flattered. My writing is apparently distinctive enough for casual readers to discern.

    Will Indians take jobs from (>THEY!>)?

    Why would Jews care what I did, by the way?

    What am I doing?

  258. anon[228] • Disclaimer says:

    “After John Bolton entered the White House as national security adviser in April, however, he persuaded Trump to view Syria in the context of the administration’s vendetta against Iran—at least for the time being. Bolton declared this week that US troops would not leave Syria as long as Iranian troops serve outside Iranian borders”

    https://original.antiwar.com/porter/2018/10/03/could-trump-take-down-the-american-empire/

    Bolton might not be a Jew but he knows what the Jews want He provides and he gets rewarded by them while everyone else calls him a moron Those who call him not to be a moron , are financially socially DNA -wise and occupationally related or dependent on The Jews.

  259. anon[228] • Disclaimer says:
    @lavoisier

    Dont we have the same problem today? Israel supports ISIS and protects ISIS and promotes ISIS . But Israel also hated Morsi – and hates Hamas – for being member of Muslim Brotherhood or being a Terror out- fit. It also routinely accuses Iran of supporting Al Quida – anotehr term to describe multiple faces of same problem. It finds American attempts to slwo down the engagement in Syria to be profundly disturbing and it attacks Syria despite the fact that Syria has been trying to rescue itself and the world from ISIS.

    So what gives?

    That answer will help you understand the labyrinthine complex century-old Zionist behaviors.

    The inconsistency is not a moral or a legal barrier to the Zionism .Because morality or legality applies to human. Once rest of the human beings have been designated as nothing but animals, the psychological resistance against breaking the values based on human kinship and morality disappear.

    Animal trainer knows it well Zoo keeper knows it well. People who herd sheep or get or cow know it well. They don’t get angry with the recalcitrant animal They just want to make sure their interests are served. They dont hate those animals They don’t love them either. The animals and the feelings/values cherished by the animals are insensible

    • Replies: @anon
  260. Josecanuc says:
    @annamaria

    (All From Wikipedia)
    Bertrand Arthur William Russell, (1872 – 1970) was a British philosopher, logician, mathematician, historian, writer, social critic, political activist, and Nobel Prize Laureate.
    Read his Selected Bibliography at Wikipedia (if your curious)
    ON EINSTEIN: “The essence of Einstein’s profundity lay in his simplicity; and the essence of his science lay in his artistry – his phenomenal sense of beauty.”
    “The greatness of Einstein lies in his tremendous imagination, in the unbelievable obstinacy with which he pursues his problems.”
    “Einstein was indisputably one of the greatest men of our time. He had, in a high degree, the simplicity characteristic of the best men of science – a simplicity which comes of a single-minded desire to know and understand things that are completely impersonal.”
    “Of all the public figures that I have known, Einstein was the one who commanded my most whole-hearted admiration…Einstein was not only a great scientist, he was a great man. He stood for peace in a world drifting towards war. He remained sane in a mad world, and liberal in a world of fanatics.”

    Eugene Paul “E. P.” Wigner – a theoretical physicist, engineer and mathematician. He received the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1963 “for his contributions to the theory of the atomic nucleus and the elementary particles, particularly through the discovery and application of fundamental symmetry principles”.
    Eugene Wigner wrote of Einstein in comparison to his contemporaries that “Einstein’s understanding was deeper even than John von Neumann’s. His mind was both more penetrating and more original than von Neumann’s. And that is a very remarkable statement.”

    John von Neumann – a mathematician, physicist, computer scientist, and polymath. He made major contributions to a number of fields, including mathematics (foundations of mathematics, functional analysis, ergodic theory, representation theory, operator algebras, geometry, topology, and numerical analysis), physics (quantum mechanics, hydrodynamics, and quantum statistical mechanics), economics (game theory), computing (Von Neumann architecture, linear programming, self-replicating machines, stochastic computing), and statistics. Von Neumann was generally regarded as the foremost mathematician of his time and said to be “the last representative of the great mathematicians”. He was a pioneer of the application of operator theory to quantum mechanics in the development of functional analysis, and a key figure in the
    development of game theory and the concepts of cellular automata, the universal constructor and the digital computer.
    He published over 150 papers in his life: about 60 in pure mathematics, 20 in physics, and 60 in
    applied mathematics, the remainder being on special mathematical subjects or non-mathematical ones. His last work, an unfinished manuscript written while in hospital, was later published in book form as The Computer and the Brain.

    Sir Joseph John Thomson OM PRS (1856 – 1940) was an English physicist and Nobel Prize Laureate in Physics, credited with the discovery and identification of the electron; and with the discovery of the first subatomic particle.
    On Einstein: “One of the greatest – perhaps the greatest – of achievements in the history of human thought.”

    C. P. Snow, Conversations with Einstein
    “To me, he appears as out of comparison the greatest intellect of this century, and almost certainly the greatest personification of moral experience. he was in many ways different from the rest of the species.”

    Michael Faraday – “The real truth never fails ultimately to appear. Truth happens to an idea by the process of its verification.”

    • Replies: @NoseytheDuke
    , @john
  261. anon[228] • Disclaimer says:
    @anon

    The animals and the feelings/values cherished by the animals are insensible—– should read as
    are dispensable .

  262. Deep State Traitors in the British government started WW1, but they were helped by the Rothschilds who were war financiers. These traitors infiltrated the French and Russian governments and they all agreed to destroy Germany. France was promised Alsace-Lorraine, and Russia was promised the Dardanelles. If you blame the Jews for the Russian Revolution, then they participated in stopping the destruction of Germany. It was one time that the regular people stood up to their oppressive government and walked away from the war. However, these traitorous agents prolonged the war by three more years with the help of the war financiers causing the deaths of millions more. They have no regard for life. It is no coincidence that the mis-named Federal Reserve and the income tax were established one year before WW1. Their ultimate goal now is the destruction of Russia. Germany is just one of their vassal states where it is a crime to discuss these issues. 911 is no coincidence for it set up the war state and the Patriot Act where our “rights” have been revoked.

    • Replies: @Skeptikal
  263. @Josecanuc

    (All From Wikipedia)

    There’s the problem with your comment.

    • Replies: @Miggle
  264. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @Jeff Stryker

    You didn’t answer my question. So let’s try again.

    Why do you continue to post about White welfare class drug addicts who ave children when they’re young on this site whose readers are prosperous middle and upper class mostly science and tech educated professional and managerial men?

    What do you have against young marriage and child bearing? Just because you didn’t marry and have children young doesn’t mean everyone should wait till 40 for marriage and 45 to have a first child.

    You despise people who found jobs careers and homes in America. Why?
    You couldn’t find a job in America so you left.

    You’ve got an overwhelming superiority complex. I got married and had children late. I work and live abroad

    Therefore I am superior. How tall are you? You probably think your height is superior I’m sure you think all men shorter or taller than you are inferior

    Your ignorance about America is abysmal which is to be expected of someone who knows nothing about America but the slums of Detroit and Phoenix.

  265. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @Miggle

    If slaves of Greeks were so well treated why did the women of Troy throw themselves and their children off the walks to their deaths rather than be enslaved by the Greeks?

    • Replies: @Miggle
  266. @Anon

    I’m 5 foot 9. Not tall at all.

    Robert Lindsay himself made the point that under a certain income, you are always in harm’s way of Cholos and Hood Rats and white trash. You cannot get away from the if you earn $30,000 a year. Lindsay himself mentioned living in a neighborhood that is now Mexican. And he also pointed out that depending upon your skill-set, moving to a smaller city or town is impossible.

    If you cannot afford to get away from the worst of the worst and you can find a job overseas, you might as well move there.

  267. @Anon

    [A very large fraction of your comments are off-topic and content-free rambling. Drastically reduce your rate of commenting and keep them strictly on-topic or none of them will henceforth be published. You might be much happier at a different website.]

    One of the problems with this site is so many people purporting to be older middle class white-collar techs are in fact 17 year old Indians or run-of-the-mill 4 Chan types pretending to be adults.

    Most of them have not even been to the United States. They get on these boards to try and learn about the West through preposterous impersonations.

    I suspect you are not the middle-aged white man you purport to be and are in fact an Indian.

    • Replies: @TRASH(not)
  268. Miggle says:
    @Anon

    The Hellenophobic propaganda of their MSM.

  269. Miggle says:
    @NoseytheDuke

    @Josecanuc

    (All From Wikipedia)

    There’s the problem with your comment.

    It means you can follow Jose to those Wikipedia articles on Einstein, and explain to us in what respects those articles are biased and rigged. You can sign up and correct any that are wrong, save the corrected article, and tell us how long it was before another editor wiped out your corrections and restored the original deceptions.

    As of now, the accuracy and fair balance of those articles has not been questioned.

  270. @jilles dykstra

    Jilles, I for one appreciate your knowledge and your references. I’ve even read a couple of the books you have recommended. It doesn’t mean I have to agree with everything you write or vice versa. That’s why the Unz Comment section is as valuable as the articles themselves.

    Likewise Wally I have consulted the Codoh website and am currently reading the updated version of the Leuchtner Reports.

    Let not this comment section deteriorate into mutual slagging off and for the obvious trolls just ignore them

    • Replies: @jilles dykstra
  271. @Malaysian Truther

    Whenever I get a reply with some factual content I answer.
    Do not think I ever did otherwise.
    Agree with me, most of the time I just bring facts.
    The great thing about truth is consistency.
    Someone once asked why I trusted authors, I do not trust any author.
    I compare them.
    Of course, some things w’ll never know any more, with absolute certainty, such as the gas chambers for humans.
    How to prove they did not exist ?
    Try to prove that UFO’s do not exist.
    You just need one UFO to prove that they exist, you just need one installation in a former German concentration camp that obviously was used for killing humans, to prove that such an installation did exist.
    As far as I know no UFO was ever caught, though I’m still in doubt about Rosswell, no installation has been found for gassing humans about which no doubts exist.

  272. @anarchyst

    Mr Leuchter’s report was rubbished by Richard Evans in his report for the defence at Irvings libel trial as ‘pseudo-scientific’. Coming from a Professor of History and of Wilhelmine Germany, that as we say in England takes a ‘brass neck’

  273. @Malaysian Truther

    Several scientific studies now exist, by universities, using advanced chemical analytical methods, that show that the asserted gas chambers were never used in the asserted way.
    I never took the trouble to file the links.
    The conflicting stories about these gas chambers were enough for me.
    There is also an interesting site where someone visiting Auschwitz, who was able to ask a lot of questions, the staff did not like it, writes about this experience.

    The Oradour sur Glane circus in S France is comparable, those who ask questions about the ceiling in the church are not welcome.
    Vincent Reynouard, ‘Die Wahrheit über Oradour, Rekonstruktion und Forschungsbericht eines Franzosen, Was geschah am 10. Juni 1944 wirklich ?’, Stegen am Ammersee, 2005 (Le Massacre d’Oradour, Antwerpen 1997)
    The book could be published in Austria as ‘study book’.

  274. anarchyst says:
    @Malaysian Truther

    Mr. Leuchter used accepted scientific practices when obtaining his “gas chamber samples”. Evan’s status as a “professor” does not lend any credence to his assertions that Leuchter’s methods were suspect. Evans was used by the pro-holocaust crowd; his assertions must be taken with a grain of salt…
    Don’t forget that these holocaust show trials utilize the concept of “judicial notice” where evidence that counters “the commonly accepted beliefs” of the holocaust cannot be entered into evidence, even if this evidence is proof that counters the “commonly accepted belief”.
    Regards

  275. @Malaysian Truther

    Mr Leuchter’s report was rubbished by Richard Evans in his report for the defence at Irvings libel trial as ‘pseudo-scientific’. Coming from a Professor of History and of Wilhelmine Germany, that as we say in England takes a ‘brass neck’

    I’ve read Evans’ expert report. It’s surprisingly intemperate.

  276. Skeptikal says:
    @redmudhooch

    Long before the “civil war” in Syria became an item on the daily news—maybe up to seven years ago; I can’t recall exactly when—a friend drew my attention to the danger posed to the ancient Christian community in Syria. That that community was being decimated and destroyed.

  277. Skeptikal says:
    @Charles Carroll

    Didn’t the Rothschilds get started by financing Napoleon’s wars?

    The collapse of the feudal system—in which each person in the hierarchy, at every level, was obliged to provide military service plus manpower to the fellow above him, up to the king—has to have been an enormous opportunity for bankers to lend large amounts of money to political leaders who wanted to consolidate power or make war.

    In the good olden days, the only source of “trust” between bankers in far-flung cities and countries—so that letters of credit could be issued with confidence instead of sending bags of money traveling around the countryside—was if they were all in the same family.

    Eventually, “family” expands to “tribe.”
    But it doesn’t expand much further than that.
    “Community” is a euphemism for “tribe.”

  278. Anon[171] • Disclaimer says:
    @Wizard of Oz

    I really don’t put much credence in the idea that either the popular conception of Robin Hood or the actual original if any existed belonged to any sort of nobility whether Saxon or otherwise, or that there was any “ethnic” conflict in the idea other than opposition to the Forest Laws.

    Robin Hood stories mostly date to the 1300s and 1400s; unsurprisingly they don’t mention many Jews, who are probably more likely to be found on the cast of Robin and the 7 Hoods.

  279. annamaria says:
    @Miggle

    The Russel’s opinion of Einstein is very nice indeed, but it is impossible to overlook a very simple fact that Einstein failed to mention ALL scientists that developed the math and physics of the theory of relativity in “pioneering” papers. This is particularly suspicious because he worked in a patent office and was well-aware of the importance of timing of publication of a scientific paper. For example, a date of his publication suggest that he “borrowed” ideas from his contemporaries without acknowledging the names of those who worked on the same problem.

    A sample: http://www.pienisalaliittotutkimus.com/2018/02/08/einstein-conspiracy-and-the-exceptional-intelligence/
    “Einstein submitted a manuscript with covariant equations in November 25 and his article was published extra fast in December 2. This article does not mention Hilbert. Hilbert rewrote the article in March 1916 with identical covariant equations as in Einstein’s paper. This article mentions Einstein. It is only a question what happened between November 11 and November 25.

    In November 16 and 17 Hilbert sent to Einstein notes from a talk he had given in 16 November. On November 18 Einstein replied that Hilbert’s equations are equivalent to what he himself had derived in the last four weeks. In November 20 Hilbert lectured on the problem. It follows from these dates and comments that Einstein had a new solution in November 18 and it was the same solution that Hilbert had in November 16. Einstein claims to have found it in the last four weeks, but in November 11 he had not found it. Thus, Hilbert found it first and presented it in November 16 and November 20. Einstein did not independently find it but noticed his problem from the notes Hilbert had sent to him in November 16 and 17. Einstein immediately corrected his paper, submitted it in November 25, and got it published in December 2 without any mention of Hilbert.

    This is apparently what happened, so it was foul play from Einstein’s side. Einstein apparently thought that Hilbert tried to steal his result. This is to be understood in the following way: Einstein had invented the problem and worked on it, but could not do math well enough. His friend Grossmann formulated the problem as Riemannian tensors. Then jumps up Hilbert, a mathematician, and tries to publish a solution, which is just as Einstein wanted. Einstein tries to find an error and points to non-covariance. Hilbert fixes it and then Einstein has no other way to save his right to be the creator of his theory but to fast edit a paper and publish it through his contacts in 7 days while delaying Hilbert’s paper and making galleys of the original version of the paper.”

    • Replies: @Josecanuc
  280. annamaria says:
    @Miggle

    sorry — his “pioneering” papers

  281. Miggle says:
    @Anon

    Thanks for your valuable contribution.

  282. john says:
    @Josecanuc

    Einstein was the biggest plagiarist ever to walk the planet

    • Replies: @Josecanuc
  283. @Miggle

    Or… one could simply reference a more credible source.

    • Replies: @Anon
    , @Anon
  284. Anon[390] • Disclaimer says:
    @NoseytheDuke

    Sometimes you can be very silly. (Is it that “shortwindeness” that has been acutely ascribed to you?). The idea that those quotes from Russell, Thomson et al. were to be ignored and treated as false news because they were found on Wikipedia is beyond barmy unless just the product of terminal mental inertia and laziness.

    • Replies: @NoseytheDuke
  285. Anon[436] • Disclaimer says:
    @NoseytheDuke

    Hey, Einstein was played by that great Aussie Geoffrey Rush in Genius so he must have been an OK modest bloke who never worried about priority or failed to give credit where due.

  286. @Jeff Stryker

    Congrats Jeff, you’ve been noticed by our esteemed editor, just like your buddy Thomm.

    You two make the perfect couple. I wonder if you two are butt-buddies or rather you are his alter-ego or vice versa.

    Once you are off your drugs (and poontang), think about why Unz said what he said. This isn’t a site for useless rants and other tricks. By the way not many people here would go for your bait.

    Good luck.

  287. Miggle says:
    @jilles dykstra

    I think T. E. (Ned) Lawrence (Lawrence of Arabia) wrote about it, but I haven’t found the place. He does write:

    The shallow and half-polished committee of the Young Turks were descendants of Greeks, Albanians, Circassians, Bulgars, Armenians, Jews—anything but Seljuks or Ottomans.

    (7 Pillars Ch. VI) Perhaps that tells us nothing. There is no inference available from the fact or thought that the Young Turks were in part descendants of Armenians.

    Oh yes! Only incidental mention. Lawrence is more interested in a future Arab rebellion than in a past episode. And his writing is too convoluted or artistic for my little brain to pull it all together, but here are a few sentences, in order but with wide gaps, from the latter part of Seven Pillars of Wisdom, Chapter IV:

    Mobilization put all power into the hands of those members—Enver, Talaat and Jemal—who were at once the most ruthless, the most logical, and the the most ambitious of the Young Turks. They set themselves to stamp out all non-Turkish currents in the State, especially Arab and Armenian nationalism. [...]

    In Syria [...]; and their arrest and condemnation, and the crop of deportations, exiles and executions [...] taught the Arabs of the Fetah that if they did not profit from their lesson the fate of the Armenians would be upon them. The Armenians had been well armed and organized; but their leaders had failed them. They had been disarmed and destroyed piecemeal, the men by massacre, the women and children by being driven and overdriven along the wintry roads into the desert, naked and hungry, the common prey of any passer-by, until death took them. The Young Turks had killed the Armenians, not because they were Christians, but because they were Armenians; and for the same reason they herded Arab Moslems and Arab Christians into the same prison, and hanged them together on the same scaffold. Jemal Pasha united all classes, conditions and creeds in Syria, under pressure of a common misery and peril, and so made a concerted revolt possible.

    • Replies: @annamaria
  288. annamaria says:
    @Miggle

    “The shallow and half-polished committee of the Young Turks were descendants of Greeks, Albanians, Circassians, Bulgars, Armenians, Jews—anything but Seljuks or Ottomans.”

    This is indeed a little known aspect of the “Young Turks:” http://themillenniumreport.com/2015/11/why-were-jewish-zionists-behind-the-armenian-holocaust-2/
    “A 1994 conference paper lecture by Joseph Brewda of Schiller Institute, entitled “Palmerson launches Young Turks to permanently control Middle East “, claims the founder of the Young Turks to be a certain Jew by the name of Emmanuel Carasso. He states: “Carasso set up the Young Turk secret society in the 1890s in Salonika, then part of Turkey, and now part of Greece. Carasso was also the grand master of an Italian masonic lodge there, called ‘Macedonia Resurrected.’ The lodge was the headquarters of the Young Turks, and all the top Young Turk leadership were members.”

    http://www.atajew.com/2000/05/young-turks.html

    “The ‘Young Turks’ had nothing common with the Turks or with being Turkish except the word “Turk” in the name of the organization. The “Young Turks” organization was founded and run by the Doenmehs (the secret Jews who were the descendants of Sephardic Jews). The Young Turks rebelled against the Sultan Abdulhameed II in 1908 and overthrew him. The Ottoman State was run by the Doenmehs during its last years. Mustafa Kemal was an ardent Doenmeh too.”

    And here is something very interesting: “Why won’t Israel acknowledge the Armenian Genocide?”

    http://themillenniumreport.com/2015/11/why-wont-israel-acknowledge-the-armenian-genocide-the-donmeh-jewish-leadership-of-turkey-was-responsible/

    • Replies: @jilles dykstra
  289. Josecanuc says:
    @john

    
    “It is our duty to tell others no more than they are able to receive. Men grasp only what is to his measure” “There is nothing more creepy than ignorance in action.” Goethe

  290. Josecanuc says:
    @annamaria

    wikipedia:
    Max Karl Ernst Ludwig Planck – German theoretical physicist whose discovery of energy quanta won him the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1918.

    Einstein and the theory of relativity – In 1905, the three epochal papers by Albert Einstein were published in the journal Annalen der Physik. Planck was among the few who immediately recognized the significance of the special theory of relativity. Thanks to his influence, this theory was soon widely accepted in Germany. Planck also contributed considerably to extend the special theory of relativity. For example, he recast the theory in terms of classical action.
    Einstein’s hypothesis of light quanta (photons)… was initially rejected by Planck. He was unwilling to discard completely Maxwell’s theory of electrodynamics. In 1910, Einstein pointed out the anomalous behavior of specific heat at low temperatures as another example of a phenomenon which defies explanation by classical physics.

    Planck and Nernst, seeking to clarify the increasing number of contradictions, organized the First Solvay Conference (Brussels 1911).

    At this meeting Einstein was able to convince Planck. Meanwhile, Planck had been appointed dean of Berlin University, whereby it was possible for him to call Einstein to Berlin and
    establish a new professorship for him (1914). Soon the two scientists became close friends and met frequently to play music together.

    The International Solvay Institutes for Physics and Chemistry, located in Brussels, were founded by the Belgian industrialist Ernest Solvay in 1912, following the historic invitation-only 1911 Conseil Solvay, considered a turning point in the world of physics.

    Photograph of the first conference in 1911 at the Hotel Metropole.
    Seated (L-R): W. Nernst, M. Brillouin, E. Solvay, H. Lorentz, E. Warburg, J. Perrin, W. Wien, M. Curie, and H. Poincaré. Standing (L-R): R Goldschmidt, M. Planck, H. Rubens, A. Sommerfeld, F. Lindemann, M. de Broglie, M. Knudsen, F. Hasenöhrl, G. Hostelet, E. Herzen, J.H. Jeans, E. Rutherford, H. Kamerlingh Onnes, A. Einstein and P. Langevin.

    So what it all means is that all these Nobel Prize Physicists in the photo – Bohr, Lorentz, Curie, Poincare, Planck, Sommerfeld, de Brolie, Lindermann, Rutherford and Lagenvin – were all in “It” together – disregarded the fact that Einstein was a charlatan, a plagiarist.

    This can only mean that it didn’t matter to them that Einstein was a fraud since they were all frauds, serial plagiarists – and welcomed him into their Solvay Secret Society of Scholarly Scoundrels if he promised not to spill the beans (so to speak).

    • Replies: @j2
  291. @Anon

    The idea that I asserted that those quotes were false comes from your mind not mine and is the product of your own terminal mental inertia. If Wikipedia is seem by many as a questionable source, and it is, then those quotes will either be read elsewhere or not at all.

  292. Bukowski says:

    24 min documentary from the early 1980s on US tv which surprisingly explains the duplicity and complicity of Winston Churchill and Franklin Roosevelt in the sinking of the Lusitania. Narrated by actor Leonard Nimoy. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gvsE9zk9KQY

  293. j2 says:
    @Josecanuc

    Wikipedia is a great source of information, so you found that somebody had written:
    “Einstein’s hypothesis of light quanta (photons)… was initially rejected by Planck.”

    while the normal history writing claims that Planck proposed the quantum hypothesis in 1900:
    “The quantum hypothesis, first suggested by Max Planck (1858–1947) in 1900, postulates that light energy can only be emitted and absorbed in discrete bundles called quanta. Planck came up with the idea when attempting to explain blackbody radiation, work that provided the foundation for his quantum theory.”

    In 1900 Einstein had just graduated as a master and started working in the patent office. He just got his first paper published, about the capillary phenomenon, nothing yet of light quanta. Later he joined Plancks discussion group, where there were other Jewish students also. He was working on the Ph.D.

    “So what it all means is that all these Nobel Prize Physicists in the photo – Bohr, Lorentz, Curie, Poincare, Planck, Sommerfeld, de Brolie, Lindermann, Rutherford and Lagenvin – were all in “It” together – disregarded the fact that Einstein was a charlatan, a plagiarist. This can only mean that it didn’t matter to them that Einstein was a fraud since they were all frauds, serial plagiarists – and welcomed him into their Solvay Secret Society of Scholarly Scoundrels if he promised not to spill the beans (so to speak).”

    No, it does not mean anything what you sarcastically claim. Einstein did use results of others and wanted to take all merit to himself, this is true. So, in some sense one can say he was a plagiarist, I would more like say, wanting all merit and using rather dirty methods, like getting a paper published in 7 days (think what it means, no peer-review can be so fast) to have a paper before Hilbert. Despite that he was also a good physicist. Einstein was supported by Planck. There was a group of researchers, led by Planck, who wanted to get the concepts of so called new physics accepted. Some in this group did not support some of these new concepts, like Poincare and Lorentz wanted to keep the absolute time. Special relativity uses the Lorentz transform but interprets it as meaning that there is no absolute time.

    As you seem to think that Einstein was a supergenius, so you must think that his choice of dropping the absolute time (it was his only contribution in special relativity, otherwise the theory is from Poincare and Lorentz) was the correct one, let me remind you that ever since the special relativity was pushed through (like darwinism in biology) researchers have known that it has a serious logical problem. In Newtonian mechanics (with the absolute time) if there are two men A and B who are moving away with a relative speed v, we can see the situation as A staying fixed and B moving with the speed v, or B staying fixed and A moving with the speed -v. There is no absolute rest coordinate system, but in special relativity, if v is close to c, if A is moving, his local time goes slower, while if B is moving, his local time goes slower. The coordinate systems are absolute: there is an absolute rest frame. Most agree that there should not be any absolute rest coordinate system, and special relativity itself claims that there is no such system, but in that theory there is. So, this is a very old problem/contradiction in the special relativity.

    Let me just also mention that there are alternative, more logical solutions to the constant speed of light, but as there is the science establishment, which does not allow criticizing some theories. It is not as you suggest, that all Nobel Prize winners support these theories and that they do not know that there are problems in them. It is so that if you oppose such theories, your career will be ruined. So, to answer your provocative suggestion: no, not all of these people in the photo were cheaters and crooks, but already at that time you had to be careful of what you say aloud.

  294. Tony M says:

    Good grief, where to start with this (noting too that it’s dated June 2013).

    There was no functional British blockade of Germany as far as military supplies till after the Tsarist government had fallen in Feb 1917. This was not in Britain or France’s interest as millions were already dead but what did their governments care, they were mostly uppity-getting proles from the provinces, with dangerous silly ideas in their heads about equality, enfranchisement, and even democracy.

    However much they may have mouthed otherwise and still deny that charge vigorously, Zionism supported Germany to the hilt and with all their undue economic power for as long as Germany was fighting Russia and killing Russia’s finest youth in incalculable numbers and vice-versa. Their betrayal of Germany once their Bolshevik terror had free reign to stalk and torment the peoples of Russia was as great a contributing factor to the rise of anti-Bolshevism and Nazism as the blockade which stiffened in its intensity and continued long-long after the war until 1924-1925 and constituted a cold, calculated genocide, every bit as much a contributing factor as the frankly insane and mendacious diktats of Versailles which repulsive post-war BritNat establishment hagiographers and ‘historians’ like Niall Ferguson and others delight in pinning entirely on the French. Hitler’s banging on about betrayal and being stabbed in the back was not entirely an allusion to waning home-front political and public support for the war when the pinch and starvation really began take their grim toll on German people, but on the collapse of the covert international props which had sustained them in the fight from its beginning until the Tsar abdicated, the pretend blockade became real and the Bolsheviks and Zionists had Russia by the throat and their title to Palestine written in blood.

    The author also suggests Amercan boots were on the ground three months after April 1917, i.e. July 1917 -except in token numbers countable on his fingers and toes perhaps, try a full year later July 1918 and you might be closer to the truth, the Germans certainly didn’t see any of them up close and fighting until late-fall and the onset of winter 1918 when it was all but over, which was coincidentally when loan arrangements made in 1915, between Britain, France and US bankers came to their contractual end. To the exact day 11th November 1918 that the war officially ended -how could they have predicted that in advance?

    Drafts of the Balfour declaration were going back and forward between Walter Rothschild (his father ‘Lord’ Nathaniel Rothschild died in 1915), its recipient and the coup-regime of Lloyd-George which had succeeded Asquith, for months if not years beforehand, and between Chaim Weizzman and Walter Rothschild too, it was in effect dictated by Weizzman and Walter Rothschild himself, to himself, in a usurpation of the British government and control of its foreign policy and conduct of the war; it was already in the bag such that the seasoned core of the British army and its equipment was being steadily removed from France to Egypt in early-fall 1917, the excuse was that there would be little movement on the western front through the fall and winter of 1917, leaving a skeleton command and an army of half-trained cannon-fodder in its stead – though the war really did still hang in the balance and this move was frankly the act of lunatics gripped by a sick obsession with Palestine over all else – in what were euphemistically called the ‘mud-months’. Though it would be almost a year yet before a comparable number of green but well-equipped and provisioned American troops would take their place.

    The perfect synchronicity of the Balfour Declaration, and the launch of the Bolshevik revolution, of course were not mere coincidence, news of the first immediately fired the starting-pistol for the other.

    Despite the senseless bloodshed, the war in the west, as in the second world war, was very much a phony-war for much of its duration. Russia was the number one target, any damage done to Germany, to its treasure and the flower of its youth, was purely fortuitous, the economic and social collapse which followed ww1 was however meticulously and coldly planned and executed.

    Of interest too is that the British House of Lords completely repudiated the Balfour Declaration by a vote in 1922 which was near enough unanimous, something extraordinary in body’s long history (see Hansard), the result was not a reversal of policy in the near-East, but instead the immediate relegation of the House of Lords to an impotent constitutional fossil.

    • Replies: @jilles dykstra
    , @S
    , @annamaria
  295. There is the story of Edith Cavell, British Nurse in Belgium who was shot as a spy. She reported that British Food Aid to Belgium was actually going to the Germans in order to allow them to keep up the war.
    The ‘Nordeutsche Allgemeine Zeitung,’ of 13th March 1915, reported that large quantities of food were now arriving in Germany from Belgium by rail. ‘Schmoller’s Yearbook for Legislation, Administration and Political Economy’ for 1916, confirmed that one billion pounds of meat, one and a half billion pounds of potatoes, one and a half billion pounds of bread, and one hundred and twenty-one millions pounds of butter had been shipped from Belgium to Germany in that year alone.

    A patriotic British woman worked in a small hospital in Belgium for several years. During the war she treated Germans, and in secret, doubtless known to everyone, Allied escapees. Edith Cavell, wrote to the Nursing Mirror in London in April 1915, complaining that these… “Belgian Relief supplies were being shipped to Germany to feed the German army.”

    The Germans considered Miss Cavell to be of no importance, and paid no attention to her, but the British Intelligence Service in London was appalled by Miss Cavell’s discovery, and demanded that the Germans arrest her as a spy. Sir William Wiseman, a head of British Intelligence, and partner of Kuhn Loeb Company, feared that the continuance of the war was under threat and secretly notified the Germans that Miss Cavell must be executed. The Germans reluctantly, duly arrested her and charged her with aiding prisoners of war to escape. The usual penalty for this offence was three months imprisonment, but the German authorities meekly bowed to Sir William Wiseman’s demands and executed Edith Cavell by firing squad, thereby creating one of WWI’s principal martyrs. After the war William Wiseman went to the Versailles Conference to divide up the spoils, and then to the US where he became a partner in the Kuhn Loeb bank.

    And of course, the British propaganda machine now had enough material to boost anti-German sentiment even further, for many months to come.

    With Edith Cavell out of the way, the ‘Belgian Relief’ operation continued unabated, although in 1916, German emissaries again approached London officials a Peace Offer and with the information that they did not believe Germany could continue military operations, not only because of food shortages, but because of financial problems. More ’emergency relief’ was therefore sent, enabling Germany to continue in the war until November 1918, by which time the war had finally lost its impetus and came to an abrupt end. Or, rather, in October 1918 the British Army had taken Palestine from Turkey.

    Some of this is documented in a book entitled, ‘The Triumph of Unarmed Forces 1914-1918′ (1923) by Rear Admiral M.W.W.P. Consett, who was the British Naval Attaché in Sweden. His job was to keep track of the movement of supplies, in other words the aforesaid ‘unarmed forces’ necessary for the continuation of the conflict. For example, Scandinavia was completely dependent on British coal. This had the effect of ensuring that the Swedish iron ore that was manufactured into the U-Boats that sank Allied shipping, ironically reached Germany on vessels powered by British coal.
    In other words, WW I was serving someone else’s interests rather than those of the “belligerents.” War makes money for the banks who lend to countries, and the Warburgs were lending to both sides. (“Daddy Warbucks”).

    • Replies: @S
    , @annamaria
    , @annamaria
  296. S says:
    @ploni almoni

    More ’emergency relief’ was therefore sent, enabling Germany to continue in the war until November 1918, by which time the war had finally lost its impetus and came to an abrupt end…

    Interesting.

    I came across a personal account of a US serviceman during WWII (Fall and Winter of ’44-’45) whom had escaped his brief imprisonment by the Germans and had managed to link up with other escaped POW’s.

    The group he joined was being led by US/British agents whom had been air dropped behind the lines to spy on the Germans; apparently the German rear areas were literally being over run during that time with Allied ‘agents’ from the accounts I’ve read.

    Anyhow, as the war dragged on month after month he became quite convinced it was being deliberately prolonged. He also came to the belief that great historic German monuments in the city he was located at were deliberately being targeted for destruction by Allied bombers; this had the effect of reinvigerating the German public’s will to resist he recorded.

    He finally ended up being recaptured and spending the last month or two of the war in a German concentration camp. I think there’s a you-tube video of him being interviewed upon his release at the camp by US army signal men in April/May ’45.

    I don’t doubt wars are sometimes prolonged for ulterior motives.

    WT Stead, a close associate of Cecil Rhodes of British Africa fame, in his 1901 book The Americanization of the World on pg 10 about calculated that the US and UK had between them three times the wealth and economic resources of the combined French, Russian, and German empires.

    ‘The lion’s share of the world is ours!’ he declares in the book.

    To get the point across to the reader in the first chapter he has pages subheaded ‘the United States leads’, ‘the decree of destiny’, ‘the supreme power’ and ‘world conquerers’ in reference to the United States and United Kingdom.

    The US and UK bloc since then haven’t needed to fight these wars for resources sake as they already have owned or controlled (directly or indirectly) the bulk of them anyway.

    Since 1900 I suppose I see WWI and WWII, the likely coming WWIII, the Gulf Wars, etc, Korea and Vietnam too, not so much as ‘world wars’ but rather as ‘consolidation of power wars’ fought by the US/UK bloc in regards to a world already largely, though not entirely, conquered.

    Shaping the world to fit as it were, the objective being nothing less than the obtainment of total world power.

    The good and loyal nurse Edith Cavell was a ‘casualty’ of these ‘consolidation’ wars along with many tens of millions of others.

    https://archive.org/stream/americanizationo01stea#page/n11

    • Replies: @jilles dykstra
    , @Sparkon
  297. Joseph wasnt a Jew you MORON! Your story here starts out with a big fat lie. A Jew isnt an Israelite and an Israelite isnt a Jew nor are the women they married, Joseph didnt marry a Jew either.

    Try again with the truth this time.

  298. What you are claiming is that all the Israelites were Jews meaning Adam and Eve were Jews because the Israelites come from Adam and Eve. Therefore Ham and Japheth were Jews, everyone was a Jew in your corrupted ignorant brain but Edom who married into the Canaanites and Hittites.

    Folks that alone should make you think, but you arent here to think you are here to be pilfered by old old Jewish fables. They can never get past them even though these lies are in your face. Everything these shills teach is based on lies even though they mix truth in. If you mix truth in with sh** what do you get?

    You see genealogy means everything to these lying writers until you tell them what the Bible says about genealogy and the Jews of course. When they claim that all the Israelites were Jews they are telling you that Jesus came for the Jews and that he was also a Jew (you see they never even got past the word “Jew”). They help these so called Jews with their lies and help distort your Bible at the same time. As long as you get some proof about Jews and their involvement in starting wars you dont mind a few lies thrown in. You made your deal with the devil by the first paragraph.

  299. @S

    Historians come up with just one explanation why Hitler was not beaten in 1938, when the armies of Poland and Tsjechoslovakia still existed: FDR wanted a long war.

    • Replies: @S
  300. @Tony M

    ” There was no functional British blockade of Germany as far as military supplies ”

    Complete nonsense:
    Charles Callan Tansill, ‘Amerika geht in den Krieg’, Stuttgart 1939 (America goes to War, 1938)
    Anything was blocked, also food
    This went on, at the cost of some 900.000 hunger deaths, after the war was ended, in order to force Germany to sign the Versailles Diktat.

  301. @annamaria

    Armenian genocide, because it never happened ?
    ‘The Armenians in the Late Ottoman Period’, edited Türkkaya Atatöv, Ankara, 2002.

  302. The purpose of this thread is not to discredit the Jews it is to discredit the Bible and to make Jews the people of the Bible hence totally distorting the readers minds. Everyone knows Jews start wars and the major evils of this world, but educated people know Jews are not Israelites and that the word “Jew” alone is simply a word nicer than the “synagogue of satan” to call them who are of THEIR father not OUR FATHER! I am amazed that the people on this site allow free speech because it is obvious that this site exists to destroy truth.

    They start out with a lie for you to accept before you move on to the desert. Folks there desert without the truth and nothing but.

    Rick Adams of RBN and David Duke will be praising this site soon, you watch!

  303. Sparkon says:
    @S

    I came across a personal account of a US serviceman during WWII (Fall and Winter of ’44-’45) whom who had escaped his brief imprisonment by the Germans and had managed to link up with other escaped POW’s.

    The group he joined was being led by US/British agents whom who had been air dropped behind the lines to spy on the Germans…

    Who strikes whom.

    • Replies: @S
  304. S says:
    @Sparkon

    In general attempts to correct others small spelling errors/perceived misuse of language, etc, are seen by most as petty, small minded, and as something engaged in by those with little of substance or value to add to a conversation.

    • Replies: @Sparkon
    , @ploni almoni
  305. S says:
    @jilles dykstra

    FDR wanted a long war.

    I can very much believe that.

  306. Jay Colbe says:

    You are mixing up Jews and Zionists. Zionists, are responsible for all the evil that exists. They created WWI to control Germany and WWII to create Israel. Zionists control the media and the economies of most countries of the world, threw their central banks, in the USA it’s the Federal Reserve. True Jews are not Zionists, they pray each day for the dismantlement of Israel, and are NOT responsible for the evil done by Zionists!

  307. S says:
    @Tony M

    ..the seasoned core of the British army and its equipment was being steadily removed from France to Egypt in early-fall 1917, the excuse was that there would be little movement on the western front through the fall and winter of 1917, leaving a skeleton command and an army of half-trained cannon-fodder in its stead – though the war really did still hang in the balance and this move was frankly the act of lunatics gripped by a sick obsession with Palestine over all else..

    Fascinating angle.

    If correct, that sounds like (in part) the British Israelism aspect of things coming into play…ie that the British are of the ‘lost tribes of Israel’. First Sea Lord Fisher is supposed to have believed in that unfortunate ideology ‘without a doubt’, complete with a future global ‘parliament of man’ of some type in Jerusalem, and presumably in his view to be dominated by Anglo-Saxons. A future British king in 1922 (forget which one) expressed belief in the ideology. Queen Elizabeth is said to believe in the absurd ideology even now.

  308. Sparkon says:
    @S

    Sorry, but it’s not a small error. You should thank me for correcting your mistake, learn the important lesson about case usage with personal pronouns, save yourself embarrassment in the future, and most of all, refrain from propagating bad English.

    Whom is never used as the subject of a sentence.

    Who is your daddy?

    Who did what to whom?

    Q: Hollywood gassed whom?
    A. Hollywood gassed its own people.

    The people whom Hollywood had gassed were found rolling in the aisles.

    seen by most as petty, small minded, and as something engaged in by those with little of substance or value to add to a conversation

    Really? I always enjoy hearing from those who claim to know what most people think.

    Anyway, my #s 221 & 253 above have nothing to do grammar, when you’re ready for a break from your pronoun usage lessons.

    http://www.unz.com/article/the-jewish-hand-in-the-world-wars-part-1/#comment-2567079

    http://www.unz.com/article/the-jewish-hand-in-the-world-wars-part-1/#comment-2568534

    • Replies: @Kris
  309. annamaria says:
    @Tony M

    Thank you for the interesting details.

  310. Tony M says:

    jilles dykstra says:
    October 17, 2018 at 7:44 am GMT

    “Complete nonsense”

    You’ve snipped off the qualifying part of the sentence – till after the Tsarist government had fallen in Feb 1917 – and probably not even fully then but until the Balfour Declaration and Bolshevik takeover.

    I don’t think this today is in any doubt, several books on the subject have covered this in detail, much parliamentary time was spent on this issue during ww1 itself, the press at the time covered it too, until the censors closed the subject down. Supply via Norway, and to railhead ports in Sweden and Denmark and through the canals of Belgium and Holland, had to sustain German industries and armies on both east and western fronts, little was left however for German civilian needs. To take just a few examples, Britain itself supplied things like nickel to Germany for hardening steel shells, it was British coal too those railways ran on. American cotton for explosives manufacture is another. Herbert Hoover’s ‘Belgian Relief’ organisation fed the German army through most of ww1. A few ships, perhaps a dozen out of thousands, were escorted to ports on Scotland’s east-coast, then immediately released; in that phase of the war the Royal Navy were not hindering in the least the supply of Germany’s military needs, including from Britain itself, if anything they were facilitating it. They dared not impede American goods for example as America was at that time neutral and open for business, and there were vast profits to be made by all. French industry got in on it too supplying raw steel and ores and no doubt much more.

    Private fortunes are never sacrificed to a country’s war-effort – an individual’s real patriotism, not the rhetorical sort – is inversely proportional to their wealth. The opportunity to sell, to profiteer, and indebt hapless tax-paying masses to eternity with borrowing, crush with interest, thrives on war, it respects no borders, no flag or country.

    S says:
    October 17, 2018 at 6:14 pm GMT

    “Fascinating angle.”

    114,000 troops, idle in Egypt, is often given, most but not all were taken from France, but some were trained and sent directly to Egypt, never having set foot in France,some didn’t know where they were going, thought it was France, others from France thought they were going home, until they realised they were in the Med and passing Gibraltar. Jerusalem fell with no opposition in December 1917, it took almost another year however to conquer the remainder of Palestine, at which point the European war was concluded as mysteriously and inexplicably as it had begun. Hard fighting in what would become Syria and in modern-day northern Iraq, around Mosul (oilfields) especially would continue for another two years or so.

    • Replies: @S
  311. annamaria says:
    @ploni almoni

    “WW I was serving someone else’s interests rather than those of the “belligerents.” War makes money for the banks who lend to countries, and the Warburgs were lending to both sides.”
    – Thank you.

    A portrait of a bankster: “Sir William Wiseman, the Jewish head of British intelligence in the USA, was reportedly friendly with Max Warburg, the Jewish head of German intelligence during WWI.” https://aangirfan.blogspot.com/2009/02/wiseman-warburg-cecil-and-world-war.html

    This should be remanded of again and again:
    “Sir William Wiseman feared that the continuance of the war was under threat and secretly notified the Germans that Miss Cavell must be executed. The Germans reluctantly, duly arrested her and charged her with aiding prisoners of war to escape. The usual penalty for this offence was three months imprisonment, but the German authorities meekly bowed to Sir William Wiseman’s demands and executed Edith Cavell by firing squad, thereby creating one of WWI’s principal martyrs. After the war William Wiseman went to the Versailles Conference to divide up the spoils, and then to the US where he became a partner in the Kuhn Loeb bank.”

  312. annamaria says:
    @ploni almoni

    And here a very special intro to Kuhn Loeb bank: https://justice4poland.com/2018/10/02/we-control-both-left-right-kuhn-loeb-banker/

    “Asked why bankers would back Bolshevism, a system supposedly inimical to private ownership, Kahn tugged on his enormous cigar and explained that the bankers create apparent opposites to “remake the world” according to their specifications:

    “You say that Marxism is the very antithesis of capitalism, which is equally sacred to us. It is precisely for this reason that they are direct opposites to one another, that they put into our hands the two poles of this planet and allow us to be its axis. …

    “These opposites … meet again in the identity of their purpose and end in the remaking of the world from above by the control of riches, and from below by revolution.

    “Our mission consists in promulgating the new law and in creating a God, that is to say in purifying the idea of God and realizing it, when the time shall come. We shall purify the idea by identifying it with the nation of Israel, which has become its own Messiah. The advent of it will be facilitated by the final triumph of Israel…

    “Our essential dynamism makes use of the forces of destruction and forces of creation but uses the first to nourish the second…Our organization for revolution is evidenced by destructive Bolshevism and for construction by the League of Nations which is also our work.”

    That was a plan, in a nutshell, of Purimization of Russia.

    That was also a plan to make the US into an instrument of the Jewish Power.

    • Replies: @S
    , @ploni almoni
  313. S says:
    @annamaria

    Wow.

    From the same source you linked to regarding the quote.

    “We are a League of Nations which contains the elements of all others…Israel is the microcosm and the germ of the city of the future.”

    A curious fact. If you compare the color scheme of sky blue on stark white for both the US/UK organizations of the League of Nations and the UN it is identical to the color scheme on the Israeli flag.

  314. S says:
    @Tony M

    Thanks for filling in some of the details.

    I’m reminded of the well done early ’60′s Peter O’toole movie Lawrence of Arabia reading this stuff.

  315. @S

    There are no small errors. Next thing you know you are Melgibstein and speaking gibberish.

    • Replies: @S
  316. @annamaria

    You could say Yiddishkeit loves Yiddhishkeit even when it can’t stand itself.

  317. S says:
    @ploni almoni

    There are no small errors. Next thing you know you are Melgibstein and speaking gibberish.

    LOL! :-)

  318. anon[355] • Disclaimer says:

    Jews have done great harm throughout history, especially to the west. And America made the greatest mistake in its history when it declared war on Germany in 1917.

    • Replies: @Jeff Stryker
  319. @anon

    Germany sank a US ship and also attempted to persuade Mexico to war with the US. Jews had nothing to do with World War 1-there were still being barred from certain restaurants and country courses in the US.

    • Replies: @geokat62
  320. geokat62 says:
    @Jeff Stryker

    Jews had nothing to do with World War 1-there were still being barred from certain restaurants and country courses in the US.

    Excerpt from Benjamin Freedman’s 1961 speech on Zionism at the Willard Hotel:

    The Jews at that peace conference, when they were cutting up Germany and parceling out Europe to all these nations that claimed a right to a certain part of European territory, the Jews said, “How about Palestine for us?” And they produced, for the first time to the knowledge of the Germans, this Balfour Declaration. So the Germans, for the first time realized, “Oh, that was the game! That’s why the United States came into the war.” And the Germans for the first time realized that they were defeated, they suffered this terrific reparation that was slapped onto them, because the Zionists wanted Palestine and they were determined to get it at any cost.

    http://www.sweetliberty.org/issues/israel/freedman.htm

    • Replies: @Jeff Stryker
  321. @geokat62

    The U-boat sinking and Germany’s attempt to persuade Mexico to go to war against the United States were not factors.

    Jews were beginning to move to Palestine before World War 1. There was no law that prevented them from doing so.

    • Replies: @geokat62
  322. geokat62 says:
    @Jeff Stryker

    The U-boat sinking and Germany’s attempt to persuade Mexico to go to war against the United States were not factors.

    Excerpt from Alison Weir’s Against Our Better Judgment: The Hidden History of How the U.S. Was Used to Create Israel:

    Most analysts consider WWI a pointless conflict that resulted from diplomatic entanglements rather than some travesty of justice or aggression. Yet, it was catastrophic to a generation of Europeans, killing 14 million people.

    The United States joined this unnecessary war a few years into the hostilities, costing many American lives, even though the U.S. was not party to the alliances that had drawn other nations into the fray. This even though Americans had been strongly opposed to entering the war and Woodrow Wilson had won the presidency with the slogan, “He kept us out of war.”

    President Wilson changed course in 1917 and plunged the U.S. into that tragic European conflict. Approximately 320,000 Americans were killed or injured. Over 1,200 American citizens who opposed the war were rounded up and imprisoned, some for years.

    A number or reasons were publicly given for Wilson‘s change of heart, including Germany‘s submarine warfare, Germany’s sinking of the British passenger ship Lusitania, and a diplomatic debacle known as the Zimmerman Telegram episode. Historians also add pro-British propaganda and economic reasons to the list of causes, and most suggest that a number of factors were at play.

    While Americans today are aware of many of these facts, few know that Zionism appears to have been one of those factors…

    Diverse documentary evidence shows that Zionists pushed for the U.S. to enter the war on Britain’s side as part of a deal to gain British support for their colonization of Palestine.

    https://israelpalestinenews.org/wrote-balfour-declaration-world-war-connection/

  323. my2cents says:

    For those who believe that Germany caused BOTH world wars, may I suggest you go back in history to 1870 when about 39 German speaking INDEPENDENT, sovereign Kingdoms, Princedoms, etc. decided to unite and form the German Reich…..thus forming the SECOND greatest economy after the U.S. This could not be tolerated by GB or France, the latter of which immediately attacked/invaded Prussia, lost their shirt and were required by the Versailles Treaty to pay restitution to Prussia. In the meantime The German Reich became a reality with the King of Prussia becoming the first Kaiser of the German Reich. Ever since then everything was done to break Germany up….THAT was the cause of WWI, WW2 was a mere continuation. The Jews were most certainly involved in the various shenanigans that led to WWI.

  324. @Wally

    I always liked Simon&Garfunkel.

  325. @Thomm

    Which part of the story do you refute? Your comment is classic projection.

    • Replies: @Jeff Stryker
  326. @Alfred Barnes

    REFUTE

    Poor whites are mostly poor due to circumstance. There parents are young and blue-collar when they are born. Jewish parents are college graduates. Poor whites grow up in rural or exurban places or Podunk towns where the economy is bad. Jews cluster around the East and West coast or major cities in general. Poor whites go to lousy public schools and live in rundown neighborhoods. Jews live in the suburbs. Poor whites get into destructive drugs and get totally hooked. Some Jews do as well, but hardly to “epidemic proportions”-first white proles were into crack, then meth and by the time I was overseas and heard that heroin was popular I was weary.

    Poor whites are more likely to have minor infractions with the law than Jews. This is partly because Jews are less likely to grow up in poor neighborhoods and become whiggers, or commit crimes to support a drug habit.

    Poor whites are more likely to have children young. This is especially true of evangelical rural Protestants who foolishly marry at 20 and have 3 kids. Of course the poor white’s marriage breaks up by the time he is 25 or 30.

    Poor white families are a myriad of dysfunction. Step-parents, half-siblings, molestation, incest etc.

    Poor white girls are more likely to get pregnant by whiggers or black thugs. Very, very few single white mothers with Mulatto babies in the welfare office are Jewish. Jewish men are not often jailed for failure to pay child support.

    The media might “brainwash” whites but not Jews themselves. Jewish marriages do not seem to be destroyed by pornography, even though Jews are blamed for creating this apparently satanic industry to degrade Christians. Curiously, Ron Jeremy once remarked that he does not watch porn and thinks that it is garbage.

    Jews have higher IQ’s and a lower time preference than poor white trashnationalists. A poster earlier admitted this and it is purely a fact.

    This is the reason Asians and now Muslims have held their own better in the US.

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS
PastClassics
Are elite university admissions based on meritocracy and diversity as claimed?
The evidence is clear — but often ignored
What Was John McCain's True Wartime Record in Vietnam?
Hundreds of POWs may have been left to die in Vietnam, abandoned by their government—and our media.