The Unz Review: An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 F. Roger Devlin Archive
The Intelligent Person’s Guide to Race & Racial Differences
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

Race has been discussed to the point of weariness, yet most discussion consists of little more than wishful thinking, contradiction, and outright malice: “All the races are equal, but whites oppress everyone else. Then again, race doesn’t really exist, which is why we must strive for greater racial diversity.” It is understandable that many people are at once confused by, and sick of, the entire subject—especially white people, the targets of so much blame and hostility.

The Origin of the Races

It need not be this way. The basic facts about the races of mankind can be stated briefly and clearly. According to our best current information, human beings (i.e., the biological genus Homo) originated in Africa between two and three million years ago. From there, beginning about 1.8 million years ago, they spread out across Asia and Europe.

When any animal species spreads out across a large area, it encounters new environments which present different challenges to its survival. Individuals that would have done well in the original home environment may not do so well in the new one, and so may die or fail to reproduce. A few individuals may be better suited to the new environment than the old, and thus produce more offspring. New genetic mutations may multiply and spread in one area while they disappear in the other. Thus, over time, the animals in the new region become different both from their ancestors and from their cousins who remained in the ancestral region.

This process occurs in all sexually reproducing species, and is the driving force behind evolution. It also occurred with early human beings when they left Africa for Europe and Asia. Light skin, for example, is a harmful trait in tropical Africa, but is useful in northern latitudes which do not get as much sunlight. Hence, light skin remains a rare anomaly in Africa (mostly limited to albinos), whereas it gradually became the norm in Europe.

An Example of Racial Differences: Athletic Performance

There are countless areas in which the races may be compared and differences found. Let us begin by considering one narrow area: athletic performance. Ordinary sports fans cannot help noticing that certain sports are dominated by persons of a particular race. American basketball is dominated by Blacks, while the Olympic table-tennis gold medalists are usually East Asians. Whites dominate certain field events such as the shot put and the hammer throw.

Not only are such differences well-established; in most cases, they can be explained. For example, the dominance of international sprinting competitions by West Africans (or persons of West African descent) is due to at least six traits they share. As compared to wites and Asians, they have, on average, 1) longer legs, 2) narrower hips, 3) lower center of gravity, 4) lower body fat, 5) higher quantity of fast-twitch muscle tissue (useful for short bursts of speed), and 6) higher testosterone levels. With all these advantages, how could they not excel at sprinting?

Further Reading: Richard Lynn and Edward Dutton, Race and Sport: Evolution and Racial Differences in Sporting Ability (2015), is filled with fascinating data on differential performance by race in over fifty types of sporting competition, along with explanations of the patterns. Reviewed by F. Roger Devlin, The Occidental Quarterly, Spring 2016, “White Men Can’t Jump, Black Men Can’t Shot Put.”

Two Fallacies That Hinder Clear Thinking About Racial Differences

Reluctance to discuss or even to admit the existence of racial differences is commonly motivated by fear of possible invidious distinctions between “superior” and “inferior” races. To this our answer is twofold. First, racial differences always relate to some particular trait. West Africans may indeed be a “superior” race when it comes to sprinting. In reference to other traits, other races may be more gifted. No race is best in everything, and it is meaningless to speak of any race being superior per se. The recognition of racial differences in particular traits implies no such idea.

Second, the existence of racial differences does not logically imply that one race should rule over others or benefit at their expense. No one has ever claimed that the superiority of West Africans at sprinting entitles them to preferential treatment over whites and Asians. The same goes for all other races and all other traits. This may sound like an elementary point, but much opposition to the open discussion of racial differences is based upon a tacit assumption that recognizing such differences would ipso facto justify the mistreatment of one or more races. It is important to understand clearly that this is a fallacy.

Race and Intelligence

One of the more sensitive traits for which racial disparities have been found is average intelligence. In 1995, egalitarian liberals were scandalized by the publication of The Bell Curve by Richard Herrnstein and Charles Murray, because the book mentioned that, in America, average black IQ lags about fifteen points behind average white IQ (85 vs. 100). But this difference has been known to exist since the First World War, when the first IQ tests were administered to American soldiers. The Bell Curve merely popularized information that had long been familiar to specialists.

In fact, much larger differences can be found around the world. Black Africans have an average IQ of around 70. Australian Aborigines are even lower at 62. Northeast Asians, including Chinese, Japanese, and Koreans, average 105, slightly higher than Europeans. Ashkenazi Jews average as high as 112 (or even higher according to some estimates).

Scholars who do not want to admit that races differ have gone to great lengths developing complicated theories to account for mysteries such as persistent African poverty and widespread Jewish success. Meanwhile, such observed facts are no mystery at all for those who understand that racial differences are natural and normal.

Some people perceive differences in intelligence and the ability to achieve economic success as unfair. It would be more accurate to say they are neither fair nor unfair, since no one is responsible for them; they are a natural product of different evolutionary histories. Is it “unfair” that Border Collies are more intelligent than Bulldogs? If so, who exactly is guilty of this “unfairness?”

In one respect it is actually heartening that differences in economic success can be explained by intelligence. Egalitarians usually teach that white/black disparities in America, e.g., are due to injustices committed by whites toward blacks (“racism”). In the absence of any evidence of a white conspiracy to harm blacks, they have developed elaborate theories of “institutional racism” for which they are not able to present much evidence. If it were generally understood that whites are not responsible for the inability of most blacks to match average white levels of academic and professional achievement, racial tensions in America would be greatly eased.

Some people admit that racial differences in intelligence exist, but deny that they are natural or genetic. In their view, such differences are caused by the conditions under which people grow up. Black Americans, for example, typically grow up in poorer families and less desirable neighborhoods than whites. But children of the wealthiest twenty percent of black families still do worse in school than children of the poorest twenty percent of white families. Studies of identical twins reared apart and of trans-racial adoptions make clear that intelligence correlates with genetic relatedness rather than early childhood environment. No champion of the “environmental” theory of racial differences has ever been able to explain these facts.

Another argument is that intelligence tests are “culturally biased” against blacks because they were developed by whites. But no one has ever explained why white test designers would have designed a test on which East Asians outscore whites. Moreover, recent intelligence tests avoid culturally specific references; they are based on pattern recognition involving geometrical shapes and numbers.

Further Reading: Richard J. Herrnstein and Charles Murray, The Bell Curve: Intelligence and Class Structure in American Life (1995), chapter 13, “Ethnic Differences in Cognitive Ability.”

Richard Lynn, Racial Differences in Intelligence: An Evolutionary Analysis, 2nd edition (2016).

Race and Crime

Another sensitive area in which races may be compared is crime rates. Although it may be thought impolite to mention in mixed company, every American understands that black neighborhoods are more dangerous than white neighborhoods.

Detailed statistics on race and crime in America are kept by the FBI. Here are some highlights from this data:

* In 2013, black Americans were six times more likely to commit murder than non-blacks.

* In 2014 in New York City, blacks were 31 times more likely than whites to be arrested for murder, and Hispanics over 12 times more likely. Blacks were over 98 times more likely to be arrested for shooting (i.e., firing a bullet that hits someone) than whites, and Hispanics 23 times more likely. If New York were all white, the murder rate would drop by 91% and the shooting rate by 97%.

*Blacks are about 39 times more likely to commit a violent crime against a white than vice-versa, and 136 times more likely to commit robbery.

* Hispanics commit violent crimes at about three times the white rate, while Asians commit violent crimes at about one quarter the white rate.

*Hispanics are 19 times more likely than whites to be members of youth gangs. Blacks are 15 times more likely, and Asians nine times more likely.

* Despite recent claims by the Black Lives Matter movement and others, evidence suggests that police shootings of blacks are not more common than would be predicted by black crime rates and likelihood to resist arrest.

* However, 2015 saw a disturbing rise in murder in major American cities that may be related to “depolicing” in response to intense media and public scrutiny of police activity.

Further Reading: The Color of Crime, New Century Foundation, 3rd edition (2016) and 2nd edition (2005).

The Preference for One’s Own

Much of today’s confused thinking about race stems from America’s unsuccessful effort of the past several decades to eliminate racial discrimination, i.e., people’s tendency to prefer those of their own race. There is abundant evidence from psychological research that people of all races do practice such discrimination, often unconsciously.

* Three-month-old infants look longer at faces of their own race than those of other races.

* When whites are shown short film clips of needles pricking white- and black-skinned hands, the sympathetic pain reaction is greater and pulse increases more noticably when the white hand is pricked. When blacks view the same clips, their reaction is greater for the black hands.

* When white and black people are shown pictures of strangers, the amygdala region in their brains displays heightened activity, indicating vigilance or wariness toward unfamiliar faces. But when the pictures are shown a second time, only the other-race faces provoke high amygdala activity: the brain perceives the same-race faces as “familiar” after only one viewing.

* Various studies have shown that people are more likely to perceive those of their own race as trustworthy and to associate positive qualities with them.

* People also find it easier to distinguish between faces of their own races than those of other races. This difference has been observed in children as young as three and a half months.

In fact, the only people who do not seem to have any preference for their own race are those who suffer from a condition called Williams Syndrome. They have no fear of strangers or the unknown, and are sometimes described as “hypersocial.” They are also usually retarded and suffer from other problems.

The preference for one’s own race is a product of our evolutionary history. For most of the time humans have lived upon the earth, we have lived in kinship-based hunter-gatherer bands of between fifty and a hundred individuals. Survival depended on cooperation within the group, even extending to a willingness of individuals to sacrifice themselves for their fellows. On the other hand, such groups were surrounded by similar, rival human bands. Survival also depended on an ability to compete successfully with these rivals. Relations between such bands, therefore, fluctuated between deep suspicion and murderous hatred. Humans became adapted to this state of affairs by developing a dual pattern of behavior: cooperation and altruism within the kin group, suspicion of those outside.

This evolutionary adaptation is still visible in its rawest form among man’s nearest evolutionary relatives, African chimpanzees, which unhesitatingly kill intruders found within the territory of their troop. Any chimp suffering from Williams Syndrome, and hence unable to distinguish between his own and rival troops, would not be likely to last long in the jungle.

Kin preference can also be observed much farther down the evolutionary scale. Beehives are kin groups, and bees are very good at perceiving degrees of relatedness when they must decide whether to admit other bees to their hive or block them as intruders. Even some plants that normally try to spread their root systems as widely as possible have been observed to accommodate the nearby root systems of closely related plants rather than competing against them for space.

What this means is that efforts to eliminate “racial discrimination” are fighting against a deeply rooted fact of our human nature, or even biological nature. Exhorting normal people not to prefer their own race is, therefore, about as likely to succeed as exhorting them never to get hungry or sleepy.

Moreover, it is almost exclusively white people who are being asked today not to prefer their own race to others. Blacks, Mexicans, Jews and others are allowed to form exclusive organizations and pursue their particular interests in America. Only whites are denounced as “racist” if they do this. In effect, whites are being told to disarm themselves in a competitive and often hostile world.

Further Reading: Jared Taylor, White Identity (2011), chapter 4, “The Science of Human Nature.”

Northern vs. Southern Races

As mentioned above, the various human races emerged when early humans migrated out of Africa. Perhaps the most important single environmental difference faced by these early humans was that much of the Eurasian landmass turns cold for several months of the year, and food is scarce during this time. It required intelligence, resourcefulness, foresight, and an ability to delay gratification (i.e., impulse control), for ancient hunter-gatherers to survive cold winters. People with these qualities were more successful raising children than those who lacked them, so humans in more northerly areas gradually became more intelligent and future-oriented than those who remained in the tropics. The higher intelligence and lower crime rates of whites and East Asians as compared with Africans may be due in large part to the selective pressure of cold winters.

Another important environmental change experienced by early humans migrating out of Africa was that many diseases common to tropical Africa (Malaria, Dengue, Chagas and others) are non-existent farther north. Such diseases were and still are a very common cause of death among black Africans. Since for most of the continent’s history the causes of such diseases were not understood, it was a matter of chance whether one caught them or not; there was nothing much one could do to avoid them.

Biologists distinguish two strategies that living organisms may employ in reproducing: one, labeled ‘r,’ involves high fertility with little or no parental investment in offspring once they are born; the other, labeled ‘K,’ involves lower fertility but higher investment in protecting and nurturing offspring. Organisms may be arranged along an r-K scale according to their fertility and level of parental investment. Oysters have half a billion offspring in a typical year and take no notice of them at all: they are extreme r strategists. Mammals and birds generally have fewer offspring but feed and care for them in early life. (Rabbits are a popular byword for fertility, but the twelve offspring they average per year come nowhere near the fertility of fish or amphibians.)

Humans are the most extreme K strategizers in all of nature: they seldom have more than one child per year and several over a lifetime, but typically devote much time and effort to raising them. However, not all human groups are equally K strategizers. Compared to white and Asian populations, black Africans are more fertile and tend to devote less time and effort to their offspring. The highest fertility rates in the world today are found in sub-Saharan Africa, where women have averaged as many as seven or eight children in recent years. African women begin having children early, but the fussy parenting style common to Europeans and Asians is not usually found among them; African children are often sent out to foster parents (commonly more distant relatives) so that the mother can turn her attention to producing more babies.

This relatively ‘r’ reproductive strategy of black Africans is a natural response to an environment in which diseases that seem to strike randomly are a leading cause of death. By having a lot of children, Africans increase the likelihood that some will live long enough to have children of their own.

At northern latitudes, on the other hand, the biggest threat to survival is the regular annual recurrence of winter, a threat which may be overcome by intelligence and forethought. These conditions favor a ‘K’ strategy of devoting more effort to preparing their children for the challenges they will face, rather than simply having more of them.

A whole host of measurable differences between the races can be explained in terms of r/K selection theory. Psychologist J. Philippe Rushton (1943 – 2012) found that East Asians average a larger brain size, greater intelligence, greater sexual restraint, slower rates of maturation, and greater law abidingness and social organization than those of other races. Black Africans are at the other extreme, while whites score in between (usually closer to East Asians than to Africans). He found that this same pattern prevailed for the racial averages of more than seventy traits. The consistency of this pattern provides important evidence that racial differences are objectively real, not a mere matter of “the color of one’s skin” or socially instilled prejudice.

Further reading: J. Philippe Rushton, Race, Evolution and Behavior, 2nd abridged edition, (2000).

Race and High Achievement

A small fraction of the human race—inventors, explorers, scientists and artists—have made particularly large contributions to history and the lives of modern men. It is more difficult to define and quantify high achievement than intelligence or crime rates, but Bell Curve coauthor Charles Murray has made one of the more rigorous attempts in his later book Human Accomplishment (2003). His results will not surprise anyone with a little education, but are an embarrassment to egalitarians and multiculturalists.

For the simple truth is that the overwhelming majority of great accomplishments in history have been the work of White men living in Europe or, more recently, North America.

As mentioned above, White Europeans are not, on average, the most intelligent people in the world. Clearly, something more than mere intelligence is needed for great accomplishment. There is considerable evidence that East Asians are more conformist than Europeans, making them less likely to venture into the uncharted waters where new discoveries may be found. Recent research has found a possible genetic cause for this.

Since Jewish emancipation in the nineteenth century, Jews have contributed mightily to the arts and sciences, but for centuries before that, the most gifted Jews had their attention engrossed by trade or the study of the Talmud, and contributed little to the march of discovery and invention. Clearly, there are cultural preconditions for great accomplishment as well as genetic preconditions.

Desperate efforts are being made today by fashionable academics to deny the obvious fact of Western achievement. Some attribute it to a multi-millennial run of dumb luck; others try to make out Chinese accomplishment to have been more impressive; others still claim Western superiority did not begin until the Industrial Revolution of the Nineteenth Century. A good account of such attempts to rewrite history in an anti-Western direction is Ricardo Duchesne, “Multicultural Historians: The Assault on Western Civilization and Defilement of the Historical Profession,” Part 1, Part 2. For more detail, see Duchesne’s book The Uniqueness of Western Civilization (2011).

Caveats

I hope you have found this material interesting and informative. It is, however, somewhat simplified, so here are a few caveats:

There was not just one exodus from Africa 1.8 million years ago; there have been many, with the most recent significant expansion occurring as recently as 50,000 years ago. Today’s races are the result of a complicated history of interbreeding between earlier and later arrivals. Many of the details are still matters of controversy, and likely to be affected by future fossil discoveries. (The African Diaspora of the past five hundred years is too recent to have had much in the way of evolutionary effects thus far.)

Also, while IQ tends to be hereditary, it is not completely so. Other factors, like sub-optimal nutrition, illness, and injury, may have a negative influence on intelligence. Poor nutrition may explain why Africans have a lower average IQ than American Blacks. Recent research seems to indicate that what is hereditary is the highest IQ one may attain under optimal environmental conditions. Circumstances may intervene to lower a particular person’s IQ, but there don’t seem to be circumstances that can raise it above the individual’s genetically determined potential.

Cold winters are not a sufficient cause of high intelligence or the other “K” traits. If they were, Eskimos ought to be the most intelligent people on earth. They are, in fact, the world’s most intelligent hunter-gatherers, but on average they are not as smart as Europeans or East Asians. What’s holding the Eskimos back is that they are a very small population—not more than several thousand in pre-modern times—and spread over a very wide area. Helpful genetic mutations occur more often in larger populations, and they spread more easily in dense populations. For this reason, the world’s smartest people live in moderately cold climates, but not so cold as to make large, dense populations unsustainable. Thus, in Europe, we find the highest intelligence in Finland and the Germanic countries (German, Dutch, Anglo-Saxon and Scandinavian) rather than in Lappland; in Asia, we find that Chinese and Japanese are more intelligent than the tiny native tribes of Siberia.

In other words, a short essay like this is not enough to make you an expert on racial differences. Research is ongoing on many points. But it is a beginning, and enough to help you see through a great deal of ill-informed propaganda.

(Republished from Counter-Currents Publishing by permission of author or representative)
 
Hide 300 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. Liza says:

    For this reason, the world’s smartest people live in moderately cold climates

    But for how long will they stay smart, with having also put much effort into inventing ways to avoid even moderate cold in the winter segment of their 4-season, cold-winter place of residence. The reality is that the vast majority of white people have been spoiled rotten by all those devices and contraptions which prevent them from experiencing the wide variety of hardships (including cold) that made our ancestors smart and creative.

    Extended comfort produces weakness. I do not think this is rocket science.

    • Replies: @Diversity Heretic
  2. anonymous[148] • Disclaimer says:

    The word “racist” is now just an anti-White slur.

    Self preference and preservation (‘racism’), borders, homogeneity – those are Privileges for non-Whites.

    If a White merely ask for these same rights, he’s smeared as a ‘racistnationalistsupremacist’.

    Diversity is so obviously beneficial that they have to create laws to prevent you from declining it or questioning its benefit.

    When does ‘diversity’ end? When are Whites allowed borders? If not at 10% of the global population, how about 5%? At 0.01%?

  3. Anonymous[349] • Disclaimer says:

    Yawn, just more of this strange pro-Northwestern European, anti-non-Northwestern European (or at least non-Northwestern European-condescending), pro-East Asian, anti-African ideology. I don’t understand the hostility against Africans and the mixed American blacks. They are largely irrelevant and don’t have any ambitions to dominate society, content with being an underclass ruled by whites. I also don’t understand the tremendous favors made to East Asians. They have now in the United States become the largest race that can’t but see itself occupy the upper levels of society and naturally engage in self-preferential practices. When it comes to East Asians, I choose the Jews who are incomparably more genetically and culturally related to white Europeans.

  4. @Liza

    Central heating is probably among the least dysgenic influences on European-origin people’s evolution. State-administered welfare that rewards the least intelligent, least-inclined-to-plan, and most-impulsive people is relentlessly pulling down average group IQ. Couple that with the low fertility of high IQ women spending their most fertile years in the work force, and European-origin people are heading for a perfect evolutionary storm.

    • Agree: Realist
    • Replies: @Tom Welsh
    , @Mr. XYZ
  5. I might remind the author that, to this date, no one has ever observed a species “evolve”.

  6. anon[190] • Disclaimer says:

    Having genetic heritage from Ashkenazi tribal ancestors does not make one a ‘Jew’. Nobody is born a ‘Jew’.

    • Agree: Carroll Price
    • Replies: @Kratoklastes
    , @Jewdicious
  7. Liza says:

    Central heating is probably among the least dysgenic influences on European-origin people’s evolution.

    You could be correct about that. It may be an issue of just how high you turn up the thermostat. So many people I know think that, even during the coldest months, they should be able to walk around the house wearing next to nothing or thin, stylish clothing. Then when they get their heating bill, they screech like babies. That is what the white race has come to.

    Yes, easy-to-get welfare for dummies who have a dozen brats certainly no brighter than themselves is a major factor. My ancestors had to sink or swim.

  8. Just a summary of the usual claptrap from this claptrap accumulator.

    Instead of summarizing and getting paid for it, why not just a bunch of links to other articles on this site that say exactly the same thing.

    Except for the fact that little Nigerian girls are smarter than you. Don’t ever link to that one.

  9. If all of humankind originated in Africa, explain Neanderthal. And some Black “intelligentsia” claim that Whites are NOT human because they have 1-3% Neanderthal genes. SMH

    • Replies: @Mefobills
    , @joeamer
  10. anon[829] • Disclaimer says:
    @obwandiyag

    Just a summary of the usual claptrap from this claptrap accumulator.

    Lol.

    [MORE]

  11. G. Poulin says:
    @obwandiyag

    Do you understand the concept of “on average”? Dumb-ass.

    • Replies: @Realist
  12. trelane says:

    Evolutionarily, the best race of man is the most fecund and this, in the modern world, is probably the stupidest and most primitive of us.

    • Replies: @bruce county
    , @Anonymous
  13. @Anonymous

    “When it comes to East Asians, I choose the Jews who are incomparably more genetically and culturally related to white Europeans.”

    Jews may be culturally and genetically closer to the European norm but they have been systematically dismantling western civilization for the past 100 or more years. Everything they do is poison to our survival. East Asians may be more distant genetically and culturally but appreciate our civilization for what it is and are not trying to destroy it. If we left the east sians alone and just had amicable relations with them, they would peacefully coexist with us.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  14. Anonymous[349] • Disclaimer says:
    @Georg Pederson

    Normally I would be against any group which naturally will have interests of its own different from those of white Europeans but from the fact that they not only look like us but carry with them no foreign sentiment to their previous countries in which they lived, have lived in the United States in large numbers for already 150+ years with that to become the case for an absolute majority of Ashkenazi Jews worldwide beginning after World War II and not to mention that they have lived in Europe for 1000+ years, assimilated to such an extent that they are forgetting their own native Yiddish tongue, and derive their partial non-European ancestry from a race that is already quite similar to white Europeans, no current high-ability, self-preferential, and ambitious race can dream of coming that close to white Europeans. And East Asians will not care to appreciate white Europeans for being white European if it is bad for the East Asians, of which many instances are straightforward to think of. They just like every nonwhite group in the United States perceive anything that benefits the original white Europeans at the expense of East Asians as discrimination. The fact that we first got a racially non-European group as the Jews instead of East Asians is a blessing, and if East Asians in the United States continue to grow and considerably outnumber by a nontrival factor the Jewish population that is currently, albeit huge in its own right, continuously decreasing, this country will be worse off.

    • Replies: @Anon
  15. EG says:

    Pitiful, pseudo-scholarship. My favorite quote, “For the simple truth is that the overwhelming majority of great accomplishments in history have been the work of White men living in Europe or, more recently, North America.”

  16. What happened to Nicholas Wade? Was he non-personed?

  17. Rahan says:

    I think we can retire the old term “Trojan Horse” and introduce instead a current year variation “Tranny Whores”.

    Imagine a huge Tranny Whore filled with Jews left at the gates of East Asia.

    The naïve East Asians wheel the Tranny Whore into the city, and during the night, the Jews slip out of the “gift” and start morphing into (((fellow Asians))).

    Two generations later the native population of the host countries would all be on opioids, antidepressants, and tranny hormones, while their cities are taken over by violent gangs of Africans and Arabs, their infrastructure is crumbling, and their (multigender polymorous xenomorphic transunicorn) teens are overdosing/suiciding in waves.

    Beware of AngloZionists bearing gifts.

  18. Bliss says:

    F. Roger Devlin wrote:

    The Intelligent Person’s Guide to Race & Racial Differences

    Funny how such patently dumb people such as yourself are always boasting of your intelligence. Dude, your entire stupid article is a brainwashed regurgitation of decades old, debunked HBD talking points.

    Northeast Asians, including Chinese, Japanese, and Koreans, average 105, slightly higher than Europeans.

    Quit lying already. More than half a standard deviation in IQ is not just “slightly higher”, it is significantly higher. The highest european IQ is lower than the lowest east asian IQ. And the lowest european IQ (Balkans, Ireland etc) is a full standard deviation (15 points) lower than the IQ of multi-racial Singapore.

    Perhaps the most important single environmental difference faced by these early humans was that much of the Eurasian landmass turns cold for several months of the year, and food is scarce during this time. It required intelligence, resourcefulness, foresight, and an ability to delay gratification (i.e., impulse control), for ancient hunter-gatherers to survive cold winters. People with these qualities were more successful raising children than those who lacked them, so humans in more northerly areas gradually became more intelligent and future-oriented than those who remained in the tropics.

    Lol. Just repeating this bullshit ad nauseam won’t make it any less retarded. You must be completely ignorant of history. It was the Sun People living in hot climate zones, not the Ice People, who created the first human civilizations. The Ice People were considered primitive, uncivilized barbarians/savages until recently. Explain why northern europeans of western eurasia and the huns, turks and mongols of northeastern eurasia never succeeded in creating civilizations of their own even 3000 years after africans built the great monuments of Egypt. Unlike the eskimos they had the numbers.

    • Disagree: MBII
  19. Bert says:

    Those persons who have embraced the left’s multicultural religion will be difficult to convince about the truth of human biodiversity. One approach for possibly prying the more open-minded leftists from the religion of egalitarianism is to demonstrate that geographic variation is the standard condition in widespread species of vertebrate animals. Such variation can be in size, coloration, behavior, physiology and body proportions. Whenever explanations of geographic variation have been achieved, they focus on differences in performance, i.e., what individuals of the subspecies or local population can do functionally. That human beings vary geographically is nothing unexpected, quite the contrary, and the same goes a fortiori for human differences in performance .

    It would be possible to list hundreds, if not thousands, of scientific publications documenting geographic variation among other species than humans. Here is a random example: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0024406696900747

    An article in Unz Review demonstrating the ordinariness of human geographic variation would be a useful tool for anyone desiring to educate the biologically ignorant, but potentially educable, populace.

    • Replies: @Just passing through
  20. Bert says:
    @Bufallobiff

    I will remind the author of this comment that he is ignorant of the methods of historical science. Cosmology, geology, evolutionary biology, cliodynamics, and linguistics are historical sciences which, as the name implies, explain events occurring over time spans too large to be observed directly. At the small end of the time spectrum, the work of a homicide detective is in effect applied historical science.

    The methodology of historical science is using data observable now or over short spans of time to explain phenomena that take place over long time spans, or simply in the past.

  21. Corvinus says:

    “For example, the dominance of international sprinting competitions by West Africans (or persons of West African descent) is due to at least six traits they share.”

    The combined forces of several Western African nations (e.g. Guinea-Bissau, Sierra Leone, Liberia, Ivory Coast, Togo, Niger, Benin, Mali, the Gambia, Ghana, Gabon, Senegal) have NOT won a single sprinting medal (to my knowledge) at the Olympics or World Championships; rather, it has been the Jamaicans and the Americans.

    We also know that environment plays an integral role as well. Kenya has won an astonishing 63 medals at the Olympic Games in races of 800m and above (21 gold!), since 1968. It turns out it is not Kenya as a whole that usually emerged victorious, but individuals from a region in the Rift Valley called Nandi. So context matters here, since an argument could be made that distance running is a Nandi phenomenon. The success of “black” distance running is concentrated in a decidedly small area, with the vast majority of the continent under-represented.

    • Agree: Oliver D. Smith
  22. anarchyst says:
    @anonymous

    Let’s not forget “whitesupremacistswhowanttokillsixmillionjews” as well. lol.

    There is an internally-destructive part of white humanity that manifests itself in always “looking out for the downtrodden” and a sense of “fair play” that is absent in every other race. Every other race looks inward, to itself and determines what is best for each other, within the race. Whites posses an externalized “altruism” that is internally destructive. No other race externalizes its altruism.

    [MORE]

    Civil-rights (for some) laws, “affirmative action” statutes, preferences for jobs and scholarships based solely on race–not ability, and other non-competitive schemes have done NOTHING but drag us whites down and deny us whites our rightful place in OUR society.

    Us whites have every right to be proud of our contributions to the human race. We have done MORE to (attempt to) uplift other races than any other race in human history.

    Isn’t it curious to note that every other race wants to move to white-dominated countries, even those that practiced “apartheid”??

    Once most other races immigrate to white countries, they attempt to “tear down” the white society that they advocate living in.

    The other races are their (and our) own worst enemies…
    Asia for asians…
    Africa for Africans…
    Middle east for semites…
    White countries for everyone…

    What’s wrong with this picture??

    Multiculturalism and diversity are code words for white genocide…

    …there is no “white liberation theology”.

    Despite being the greatest promoter of advancement for ALL races, us whites are denied the right to look after OUR own interests, because “people of color” (who constantly look for and find “racism” under every rock) demand that us whites subjugate ourselves and deny ourselves the solidarity among our own kind that every other race practices.

    As far as I am concerned, us whites have done enough self-flagellation, having given up our own birthright, sacrificing it on the (false) altars of “civil-rights (for some)” and “anti-discrimination” laws that benefit only minorities.

    Pushback is coming. It won’t be pretty, but is necessary.

    A number of years ago, a survey of college students was done, asking one question: “What would life be like if every white person disappeared?”

    After extensive soul-searching, one minority student spoke up…“we’d be screwed” was the answer.

    Message to minorities–if life is so oppressive under whites, why not emigrate to whatever country you originate from?

    • Agree: Digital Samizdat
    • Replies: @Corvinus
    , @Miro23
    , @JoannF
  23. smiddy012 says:
    @Corvinus

    Where do Jamaicans and African Americans originate from?… Think then maybe they were then selected for physical prowess in the new world?…

    Genes establish the baseline, then the environment builds the trait up to full potential. Kenyans, or East Africans for that matter, outside of the Nandi valley still outperform the rest of the world in long distance competition on average.

    • Replies: @anonymous
  24. Regarding Charles Murray’s book Human Accomplishment (2003), I have attached some excerpts from the book below

    Using the cold environment model to explain gradually increasing intelligence, should it not be the case that the graph for the significant innovations in science whould gradually increase in a pseudo-linear fashion? What caused the massive uptick in innovation around the year 1600?

    And isn’t it kind of imprecise to say

    For the simple truth is that the overwhelming majority of great accomplishments in history have been the work of White men living in Europe or, more recently, North America.


    And more precise to say something along the lines of

    For the simple truth is that the overwhelming majority of great accomplishments in history have been the work of British, German, French and Italian men living in Europe or, more recently, North America.

    Because there were many Whites in Europe at the time, but only some of the White groups were really responsible for major innovations.

    Also, since we are on the topic of IQ, since IQ scores are increasing around the world (although the gap between ethnic groups is not changing much), should it not be the case that Africans of today are as intelligent as Europeans of the year XXXX? How far back is this year XXXX and if this year is relatively recent (say within 500 years) then why do Africans still not have the ability to organise like Europeans of those years?

    And while Lynn’s work was the best attempt at estimating national IQ, wouldn’t it not be far-fetched to say that it was not really a satisfactory attempt as I recall seeing some very small sample sized that could not have been nationally representitive e.g. the national IQ of Equilateral Guinea was calculated to be 59 based on a sample of 48 children aged 10-14 taken many decades before the book was published, there were also some very odd results like the IQ of Ireland being below that of Vietnam, despite the former having “achieved” more? I also recall reading an article which showed a vert substantial IQ (around 10 I believe) difference between East and West Germans despite them being genetically the same which suggests environment isn’t that small of a deal, same goes for countries like Croatia whose national IQ is 90 which is low compared to other Slavic nations.

    • Replies: @Hippopotamusdrome
  25. @Bert

    It is impossible to convince those people because we as humans will always trust our own senses and emotions over social studies. White Liberal types come into contact with the cream of the non-White demographics, think Chinese and upper-caste Indian as well as elite Blacks and Hispanics, they will see that these people came from good backgrounds and conculude that the “bad minorities” are just a product of their environment. This thesis is quite a compelling one, if one doesn’t wish to spend hours upon hours reading different studies and weighing both sides

    And lets be honest, the HBDers are not exactly innocent investigators in this saga and also have an agenda in mind, namely they want to shut out all non-Whites when it comes to immigration (Lets not discuss this topic here), so like the multiculturalists, it is indeed quite possible they let their politics cloud their judgement when analysing complex data sets and IQ studies, wouldn’t you agree?

    • Replies: @Bert
  26. anonymous[191] • Disclaimer says:
    @smiddy012

    It makes me laugh when whites gush about negro running ability which is a fraction better than the average of other races (probably less than 1/10 of 1%) which would be statistically insignificant in any other area of study. The reason that these stupid whites always bring this up I guess is because it’s the only thing that they can show that their pets are better at.

    • Replies: @Old and grumpy
  27. Bert says:
    @Just passing through

    No, I don’t agree with anything you said. First, I believe that some “White Liberal types” can be turned into race realists, and one step on their journey would be to understand that the geographic variation so well documented in human beings is nothing unusual in the biological world. Virtually all widely-distributed terrestrial vertebrate species vary in their characteristics over space.

    You are arguing that the egalitarian thesis is “quite compelling” because the average white is too lazy to read the studies documenting racial differences in intelligence, future time valuation, impulsiveness, and cultural attainment. Bull. There are no counterstudies documenting that Africans are hyper-intelligent, plan for the far future, are deliberate in making decisions, and have built impressive civilizations; therefore there is nothing to “weigh” between the side that wants to destroy Western Civilization with unchecked immigration and the side that wants to prevent the destruction.

    I was a pro-integrationist native Alabamian in the 1960’s of Bombingham. I thought blacks could be citizens as good as any. The intervening decades showed me I was wrong, as every city with a black majority went to shit. You have the cart before the horse. The data that HBD reseachers summarize determines their prescription for managing the future, not the other way around. They don’t make up the data on murder rates in Gambia; they harvest it from statistics collected by Gambians.

    You are a troll who is trying to quash a suggestion for helping to wake up Caucasians.

  28. @Bert

    Don’t get why you are being so aggressive, I myself believe in race differences because as you said geographic separation is bound to cause different levels of development in various traits like height, muscle mass and intelligence. I am merely an agnostic when it comes to the extent of these differences. I never said anything about my political opinions.

    I also was stating my opinion that your average White Liberal will not be “turned” be reading studies, your own experience seem to confirm what I was trying to say.

    You were initially a racial egalitarian, you probably heard of many people saying Blacks are less capable than Whites but decided to go with your feelings instead, only after you witnessed Black behaviour did you start doubting yourself, your change came from observation and not reading HBD studies. You yourself have basically admitted you were too lazy back then to read the various studies that were available and instead trusted your guy instinct, yet you attack me for literally saying the exact same thing in my post. Laughable.

    Also, I did not say anything about immigration, and it seems your gripe with immigration is more cultural than anything scientific, and I am guessing you do not support mass immigration of Chinese and upper-caste Indians who are currently lowering wages and taking jobs despite both groups having an IQ above 100. Would I be right in thinking this? If so then why even bring IQ into it? Are you such a slave to “science” that you rely on on it so that you can convince yourself you are “rational” and not just a “bigot”?

  29. Bert says:

    Laughable is a Soros-paid troll thinking that I care whether I’m called a bigot.

  30. Anonymous[349] • Disclaimer says:

    “Of the rest [of the world’s most important inventions] … 5% [were] Japanese.” This is rubbish, and leave it to the Japanese government of all others to quantify human accomplishment. Looking at the entire list of Murray’s significant figures in the Technology category in history, 0 are Japanese and 2 are Chinese out of a total of 239. That means the East Asian race has made 0.84% of the world’s most important inventions.

    Which European groups are making great accomplishments in arts and sciences depends on the time period. In antiquity it was the Southeastern and Southwestern Europeans, for the most part of the second millennium it was the Northern, Western, and Southwestern Europeans, and by the 1800s the Eastern and Central Europeans (with the exception of Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Belarus, and Moldova) finally came onboard and from then till 1910 which is the cutoff point in Murray’s data every group was significantly contributing except Southeastern Europeans. Every country when the time period has come when they actually contribute produces similar rates of significant figures per capita especially when compared to rates of Jewish significant figures per capita of the same country which blow them out the water. Not only that, but Murray’s list of significant figures from each country where a significant population of Jews lived becomes progressively more Jewish by proportion beginning in the early 1800s, which is uncongenial to the idea that only white men make great accomplishments when the proportion of those born in more recent times who are in fact racial Jews is 30%-50%, at least in Murray’s list.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  31. @anon

    Having genetic heritage from Ashkenazi tribal ancestors does not make one a ‘Jew’. Nobody is born a ‘Jew’.

    That’s true, with one exception: direct, matrilinear “genetic heritage from Ashkenazi tribal ancestors” makes one halachically a Jew.

    IANAW[1], but it seems that halachically, a child is not a Jew if the kid is fathered by a Jew but the egg is goyische: that seems to be true whether it’s a case of a Jewish man fathering a child with a shikse, or whether it’s a donor goy-egg implanted in a Chosen Womb (חַס וְשָׁלוֹם). Both are (obviously) איסורי ביאה. (DUH!)

    Historically the Orthodox requirement was that the mother had to be a Jew – the father’s Jewishness was not relevant.

    The requirement that Mummy be an observant Jew seems to have been more honoured in the breach.

    This is because halachically a person born a Jew is a Jew 4 Life, yo. The orthodox forms of excommunication (niddui, nezifah and herem) are all temporary expulsion from the community, not the religion.

    Again: IANAW[1], but I am reasonably certain that excommunicants are still halachically Jews, albeit one that must be shunned.

    (Also: herem is quasi-permanent: it holds until a whackball lifts it – it auto-renews even if the excommunicant calls customer service or removes the recurring payment from their Paypal).

    .

    If matrilinearity-observant-or-not is the criterion, then any woman with directly-matrilinear Jews in her line means that her kids are Red Sea Pedestrians.

    That’s also true if your tribal ancestors are Sephardi or Mizrahi… it’s even supposed to be true if your forebears were Beta Israel (HA!).

    .

    FWIW I have no idea whether or not there are Red Sea Pedestrians anywhere in my Mum’s direct maternal line. If there are it must be more than 7 generations back.

    This obsession with ancestors is stupid. I have tupuna[2] who practiced ritual cannibalism only 5 generations ago: that doesn’t make me a cannibal, or an adherent to Māori tribal religion.

    [1] IANAW: I am not a whackball.

    [2] tupuna: Māori ancestors.

    • Replies: @Prester John
    , @ivegotrythm
  32. Corvinus says:
    @Anonymous

    “White inventions” or “western science”, while noteworthy in their original ideas and innovations, of course owe much to gunpowder, paper, the compass, and movable type (Chinese), to the number 0 (India), and to the idea of a rule-based, law-giving universal Creator (Middle East).

    The rise of white people to jackbooting status, I mean bearers of civilization, was built on these discoveries.

    Bear in mind that there are few inventions that are “purely” white. Take this comment for example. It depends on the Internet and computers – “white inventions”. But it also depends on the alphabet, a Phoenician invention, and the idea of writing itself, which in the West comes from Egypt. At any point in history, most inventions will come from one part of the world because it is the most advanced at that particular time. So while most important inventions of the past few hundred years were made by white people, that is only because they have been on top during that time frame. The Egyptians and the Chinese had a far longer reign compared to Europeans when it came to technological advancements.

  33. Corvinus says:
    @anarchyst

    “Whites posses an externalized “altruism” that is internally destructive. No other race externalizes its altruism.”

    You regularly offer these statements on various threads on this fine blog, then when called upon it to offer sources to back up your claim, you run away from that responsibility. Maybe this time you will not be chicken.

    Please offer citations that show lends support to your assertion.

    “Pushback is coming. It won’t be pretty, but is necessary.”

    By whom? See, I keep hearing that this “pushback” is upon us, but it doesn’t materialize. The hordes have crashed the gate and the Pinochet helicopters are on the ground rarin’ to go…but there are few pilots. Are YOU going to be front and center to heed this call, or be in the background hoping others will do your dirty work?

    • Replies: @anarchyst
  34. Corvinus says:
    @Bert

    “I was a pro-integrationist native Alabamian in the 1960’s of Bombingham. I thought blacks could be citizens as good as any.”

    Actually, they have been. You just don’t want to believe it.

  35. anarchyst says:
    @Corvinus

    Open your eyes. Look around you. You need to get out of your shetl. If you are in the USA, you can see white externalized altruism in play on a daily basis. The proof is in the civil-rights (for some) protections extended to everyone but whites. Witness “hate crime” laws used exclusively against whites.
    “Citations” are not needed.
    Your jewish trait of misdirection and obfuscation will not work here.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  36. Realist says:
    @G. Poulin

    Do you understand the concept of “on average”? Dumb-ass.

    No he does not…or much of anything else.

  37. Big Daddy says:

    Simple, truthful, fact-filled, and not ideological.

    It leads me to live and let live: “do unto others as you would have them do unto you!

  38. Anon[391] • Disclaimer says:

    Is it “unfair” that Border Collies are more intelligent than Bulldogs? If so, who exactly is guilty of this “unfairness?”

    This idea of unfairness between races could be escalated to the principle of unfairness between individuals (as it is in “People’s republics” and “Denocratic republics of the People”).
    David Beckham could be condemned as an enemy of the people, even the White people, because he looks better than anyone else.

    Unfortunately, when you deal with humans, you deal with envy. And then you deal with vanity. Which means envy can’t be mentioned, and hundreds, thousands, of other words and reasonings have to be used in its place, acting as covers and actuators.

    Is this funny? Well, who gets involved into politics must think so.

  39. Anon[391] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anonymous

    Not everyone has the same opinion on who, what group in this case, must rule over them and their group.
    That’s all.

  40. Corvinus says:
    @anarchyst

    “The proof is in the civil-rights (for some) protections extended to everyone but whites.”

    The 1964 Civil Rights Act outlawed discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. Whites were included. Try again.

    “Witness “hate crime” laws used exclusively against whites.”

    I am not a fan of “hate crime” enhancers. And, no, they are not “exclusive” to whites.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2017_Chicago_torture_incident

    ““Citations” are not needed.”

    Of course they are needed! Once again, you run away from your responsibility.

    “Your jewish trait of misdirection and obfuscation will not work here.”

    Back to pressing your default button, huh. The Jews under your bed and in your closet really do a number on you!

    • Replies: @anarchyst
  41. Hibernian says:
    @Corvinus

    The rise of white people to jackbooting status, I mean bearers of civilization, was built on these discoveries.

    All Hitler, all the time.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  42. ‘Whites’, ‘East Asians’ and ‘Blacks’ are far too heterogeneous categories/groups to have utility in these sorts of data analyses. As was mentioned by another poster above:

    The combined forces of several Western African nations (e.g. Guinea-Bissau, Sierra Leone, Liberia, Ivory Coast, Togo, Niger, Benin, Mali, the Gambia, Ghana, Gabon, Senegal) have NOT won a single sprinting medal (to my knowledge) at the Olympics or World Championships; rather, it has been the Jamaicans and the Americans.

    We also know that environment plays an integral role as well. Kenya has won an astonishing 63 medals at the Olympic Games in races of 800m and above (21 gold!), since 1968. It turns out it is not Kenya as a whole that usually emerged victorious, but individuals from a region in the Rift Valley called Nandi. So context matters here, since an argument could be made that distance running is a Nandi phenomenon. The success of “black” distance running is concentrated in a decidedly small area, with the vast majority of the continent under-represented.

    This is precisely why ‘race’ is not an accurate way of analysing this sort of data, instead what should be studied in local populations. It’s rather funny this essay was meant to demonstrate the reality of race, but what it does is demonstrate the complete opposite.

  43. Regarding Race and Intelligence, and Race and Crime: The number one reason that intelligence and low impulse control are such explosive issues is that they are (and the former is increasingly) treated as moral attributes, or components of supposedly fully “free-choice”-determined personal character.

    If one is unintelligent (in whatever ways) or has other undesirable mental attributes, this reasoning goes, one deserves the consequences — including a life spent in several kinds of poverty, with shame and other (often untreated) mental illnesses, and shunning.

    If this attitude persists — and some widespread conservative political beliefs don’t help here — recognition of group-based low intelligences and and other brain attributes (as opposed to visible other physical attributes, say, muscularity, or weight, etc.) will continue to be taboo, and outside the MSM. It will never matter how well-demonstrated they are.

    Remove the moralism and suffer the consequences (including certain kinds of imposed egalitarianism), or prepare to argue forever.

  44. anarchyst says:
    @Corvinus

    Give it up, Corvinus. Your jewish misdirection will not work here…

  45. Corvinus says:
    @Hibernian

    “All Hitler, all the time.”

    What are you even babbling about?

  46. Liberals tell us the races are different physically but identical mentally!!! How did such an absurd idea ever get started?

    • Replies: @Phil_from_NJ
  47. The claim that black americans have an IQ of 85 is due to affirmative action grading on the tests. The actual number is much lower, i’m sure. Few blacks are even literate. And literacy is NOT playing on a cell phone. It means being able to read a newspaper as fast as you talk.

  48. “For the simple truth is that the overwhelming majority of great accomplishments in history have been the work of White men living in Europe or, more recently, North America.”

    I’m glad the author said white MEN. Very very few great women in history. Men are bigger and stronger and more aggressive and more confident and smarter. If women were as smart as men, there would be no need for all-female chess leagues and all -female math olympiads. No woman has won a Nobel prize in physics since 1963 despite all the affirmative action bias to give them one. Female physicists are mediocre as is media darling Neil de grasse Tyson.

    • Replies: @Franklin Ryckaert
  49. Truth says:
    @Hang All Text Drivers

    And literacy is NOT playing on a cell phone. It means being able to read a newspaper as fast as you talk.

    “As fast as one talks,” Sport.

  50. Spike says:
    @Liza

    I’m having that issue in my apartment right now. Not wanting to spend up to half my monthly take-home pay on rent to live in a 50% white area, I’m doing cheap rent in a majority dindu area, which means I don’t have central heat. Gotta layer up I’ve discovered. I’ll move on after a couple years to a better apartment with more “luxury” amenities and fewer dindus, but for now, gonna buy some income properties to start a portfolio. Can’t have all my money in stocks and bonds. Thankfully my dindu and south Asian neighbors will remain broke so my rent shouldn’t go up too much next year. Hell, if Trump actually deported like he said he would, my rent might go down.

    • Thanks: Liza
  51. Spike says:
    @obwandiyag

    Actually, I thought this was one of the most succinct and readable articles I’ve read on the topic.

  52. Alfred says:
    @obwandiyag

    Except for the fact that little Nigerian girls are smarter than you. Don’t ever link to that one.

    Last time I was in Lagos, I stayed at the Federal Palace hotel. My room was on an upper floor. There was no water in the bathroom, but the carpeted floor was utterly soaked. I asked at the front desk what was going on. They told me that the water only came on late at night. The previous occupant had tried to fill the bathtub and had fallen asleep – hence the flooding.

    I decided to go to the pool below to wash myself. I mean, it is the tropics and one gets incredibly smelly if one does not wash often. In the pool, I was hassled by lots of teenage girls. They were pinching my bottom and trying to pull down my swimsuit – giggling all the time. It was embarrassing. I got out.

    Next day, I went to the Airport Hotel near the old airport. I was given a bungalow in a large garden. After midnight, when the bar closed, drunk prostitutes would come and bang on my door. I had been forewarned and I kept the sliding garden door closed. Of course, there was no air-conditioning and it was not the rainy season. I had been told that if I opened the door they would steal all my gear.

    I guess the girls in Nigeria are really smart.

    • Replies: @Kolya Krassotkin
  53. The author is using reason to argue with religious zealots of the Leftist Church of Equality. He neither knows nor understands the enemy, who fights with weapons of emotion and moral entitlement. But I guess we can all feel better with our superior logic, as they march us into the local re-education camp to face Commissar AOC and her revolver.

    • Replies: @anon
  54. this was going reasonably hopeful of a decent discussion until began his nonsense about the IQ of Black people, that no one is to blame etc etc. the net effect of which is to fix Nig Nog into a shitty “intelligence space” while freeing from guilt and responsibility for the profiteers of the complete destabilization of Black life for 500 years now

    Devlin forgets that there was actully slavery in the world and the history of atrocity on Africa and Africans is long and well documented, full of apartheir and depopulating massacres…..and on and on and on.
    then I stopped wasting my time reading this that had degenerated into lies surely with some attack purpose on ordinary people..prolly on all ordianry people, that keeps us totally misfocused on RACE for there are no races of genus homo…ethic groups sure..but we know who we are now! no doubt about it..and we aint who Devlin says we are

    oh well! Devlin proves why people fed up talking and reading race. Articles like this one above by Devlin are ridiculous..do not help at all, constitutue an attack on ordianry people, everywhere, and of all ethnicity.

    and it is crucial that we see they are nor written by ordianry folk of any ethnicity, but by cold people of the upper classes who went to the schools of the west, and nowwork in elite employment that requires them to write this nonsense in attack on ordinary folk. it is the way they keep their jobs the focus of which is to maintain their social elitist position forever. this is an anti social article because it attacks the majority of the people of the world

    Devlin is a kind of twin..he and Paul Kersey are brothers in spirit if not under the skin too. I have no idea why Unz keeps these guys going..especially Kersey, who is an idiot but a committed racist of the most vulgar kind. what is Unz up to with all this anti-Black racism from on high, cast down on the people?

    again please note who is doing it all..not Black people, not ordinary white people, or Chinese, Indians and Native Indians…but academically elitist white people..which helps to prove that this is not just ained at Black people but all ordinary people to keep us focused in hate on each… and to support and join in vast atrocity when they begin on Black people to start with..then on to ordinary whites and others such as by now they understand that the system has them targeted as well..ALL ORDINARY PEOPLE -the real revolutionary threat to the elites as the financial collapse and failure of capitalism approaches

    Devlin now without it being stated backs up Kersey..increasing exponentially the negtive focuse on race on the Unz Review. whoever these guys and this publication represents the eliotes for sure are getting desparate and more urgent every day, as we the note the pumping up of racism everwhere. and the Unz Review is doing its part manfully for the statusquo

  55. @Anonymous

    ‘…I don’t understand the hostility against Africans and the mixed American blacks…’

    Your perplexity could easily be remedied.

  56. @Corvinus

    The Chinese never disseminated their discoveries to the masses of people at large. They hoarded them, sat on them, and did little in the way of additional development. Most of their so-called discoveries were re-invented elsewhere by European whites, who also created both the scientific paradigm and engineering infrastructure to make extensive actual use of them.

  57. Anonymous[392] • Disclaimer says:

    This article is just some truths that are obvious and have been talked about to death in HBD circles, mixed in with racial tropes from the white perspective.

    Trying to pass through HBD from the white perspective as fact is not going to to work.

  58. I’m pretty sure that F. Roger Devlin writes this garbage because he is a sexually perverted masochist who likes to be beaten and humiliated. This man is the walking definition of human waste. For the alternative right, far more necessary than defeating any external enemy is to purge itself of the cringing lickspittles in it own ranks like Sailer, Devlin, and Derb.

    These men are the sorriest, sackless species of humanity that God ever let through the door.

    • Replies: @anon
  59. gotmituns says:

    Here’s the intelligent/mediocre/dumb White man’s guide to race. Stick with your own and protect your women whether they want protection or not. But once they take up with a another racial group, never have anything to do with them ever again.

    • Replies: @Biff
  60. Tom Welsh says:
    @Diversity Heretic

    ” State-administered welfare that rewards the least intelligent, least-inclined-to-plan, and most-impulsive people…”

    This epitomizes the many pitfalls that beset attempts to reason about such matters. Believe it or not, there are people who combine very high intelligence with low inclination to plan and high impulsiveness.

  61. padre says:
    @EG

    That is so right!He just brushed off achievements of China, Japan, the Arab world and Ancient Americas!And as far as that IQ measurements are concerned it reminds me a little of eugenics!Someone declaring himself more intelligent and than unsuccessfully trying to prove it again and again for some thousand years, with no participation of “lower species”!

    • Replies: @Just passing through
  62. @Bliss

    And to what race did those Egyptian Africans belong? Well, not to the “Sun People” of sub-Sahara Africa. They were Caucasoids, coming originally from the Middle East. Most civilizations were created by Caucasoids, some by Mongoloids, but none by the so-called “Sun People”, the Negroids and Australoids. History is “racist”, get used to it.

  63. @Bliss

    “…More than half a standard deviation in IQ is not just “slightly higher”, it is significantly higher…”

    The standard deviation is 15 points. Five points is only 1/3 of 15. Of the Chinese IQ only results from the developed coastal regions are given. There is a serious suspicion that the Chinese IQ of the internal regions is lower. East Asian intelligence is not creative like that of Caucasians. East Asians are good by-rote learners and imitators, but not creators.

  64. @Hang All Text Drivers

    Yes, history is both “racist” and “sexist”. Long live history!

  65. Iris says:
    @Bliss

    It was the Sun People living in hot climate zones, not the Ice People, who created the first human civilizations

    It is indeed a basic fact in Archaeology and Anthropology nobody could ever challenge.

    The area undisputedly and universally considered the cradle of human civilisation is called the Fertile Crescent and stretches across today’s Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Turkey and Egypt.

  66. @padre

    The methodology of the book this article cites for that cloak was quite suspect, I recall it was based on the number of times a name was mentioned in English-language encyclopedias.

    If there was an Arab verison of the book, I imagine they would be saying most inventions are Arab.

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
  67. Anonymous[255] • Disclaimer says:

    Per Ricardo Duchesne, Professor of Sociology, University of New Brunswick…

    MULTICULTURAL HISTORIANS: THE ASSAULT ON WESTERN CIVILIZATION
    AND DEFILEMENT OF THE HISTORICAL PROFESSION, PART I:
    https://www.unb.ca/faculty-staff/directory/_resources/pdf/arts-sj/duchesne-multiculturalparti.pdf

    MULTICULTURAL HISTORIANS: THE ASSAULT ON WESTERN CIVILIZATION
    AND DEFILEMENT OF THE HISTORICAL PROFESSION, PART II:
    https://www.unb.ca/faculty-staff/directory/_resources/pdf/arts-sj/duchesne-multiculturalpartii.pdf

  68. Iris says:
    @Franklin Ryckaert

    And to what race did those Egyptian Africans belong?

    Ancient Egyptians were Black Africans from Nubia (Northern Sudan).

    They represented themselves with dark brown skin and braided hair, and that includes their Pharaohs. Below is a statue representing Tutankhamun:

    Here are Nefertiti and Akhenaton (Louvre museum):

    Egyptians summarised their views of races in the “Book of Gates”, illustrated by Belzoni from within Pharaoh’s Sethi 1st tomb. They represented themselves with a brown skin (centre lower row), lighter than that of SubSaharan Africans (top row) , significantly darker than that of Caucasoid Northern Africans/Lybians (top right) and of Persians (bottom right).

    • Replies: @OilcanFloyd
    , @Theodore
    , @dcite
  69. @Hang All Text Drivers

    This is completely retarded and you obviously don’t understand how IQ testing works.

    Do enlighten me as to how there was “affirmative action -grading” on the tests?

    Reading a newspaper as fast as you talk is not indicative of high IQ, it just means you are a good reader. If you cannot reason logically and are bad at pattern-recognition, your IQ test result will be low regardless of which IQ test you take.

  70. @Franklin Ryckaert

    They were Caucasoid but they certainly were not “White” in the socio-political definition of it today.

    My question to you is what the blue-eyed, blond(e) haired Nordic were doing at this time? And how come they evolved so damn fast, because as I seem to recall, Nordics were living in caves and still hunting at the time the naturally brown Sun people people were farming and building civilisation.

    • Replies: @Franklin Ryckaert
  71. Biff says:
    @ben sampson

    Devlin forgets that there was actully slavery in the world and the history

    And every single race, color and creed have been subjected to it, so what’s your point?

    • Replies: @ben sampson
  72. Biff says:
    @gotmituns

    Stick with your own and protect your women whether they want protection or not. But once they take up with a another racial group, never have anything to do with them ever again.

    So you lost your honey to a long(er) dick b-baller. Move on, and get over it.

    • Replies: @gotmituns
  73. Biff says:

    1) longer legs, 2) narrower hips, 3) lower center of gravity,

    Numbers 1, and 3 are mutually exclusive..

  74. Corvinus says:
    @Monotonous Languor

    “The Chinese never disseminated their discoveries to the masses of people at large. They hoarded them, sat on them, and did little in the way of additional development.”

    That would be Fake News on your part. Their four discoveries–compass, gunpowder, paper making, printing–had an enormous impact on the development of Chinese civilization and a far-ranging global impact. Gunpowder, for example, spread to the Arabs in the thirteenth century and thence to Europe. According to English philosopher Francis Bacon, writing in Novum Organum: [These] have changed the whole face and state of things throughout the world; the first in literature, the second in warfare, the third in navigation; whence have followed innumerable changes, in so much that no empire, no sect, no star seems to have exerted greater power and influence in human affairs than these mechanical discoveries.

    “Most of their so-called discoveries were re-invented elsewhere by European whites, who also created both the scientific paradigm and engineering infrastructure to make extensive actual use of them.”

    Discoveries, not so-called discoveries. Improved upon, not re-invented.

  75. @Iris

    The people who created those civilizations were Caucasoids, not Negroids or Australoids, and the Fertile Crescent is not in the Tropics. Besides, the civilization of Crete, the first civilization of Europe, was nearly as old as the civilizations of Egypt, Mesopotamia or the Indus Valley (another civilization created by Caucasoids).

    • LOL: Iris
    • Replies: @Anti-HBD
  76. @Corvinus

    He probably mean East Africa. Likely just a typo.

  77. @Just passing through

    The civilizations of Egypt and Mesopotamia started around 3000 BC. At that time agriculture had already been introduced in Europe a 3000 years before. There were no more hunters-gatherers living in caves at that time in Europe.

  78. @trelane

    Good point..But they are not successful races. If we measure quality of life by ones successes.
    13 retarded offspring cannot launch a rocket. But they can hunt and gather and kill alot of enemies as a group. So low IQ primitives may win the day in the end.
    And the meek shall inherit the earth???? Possibly so.

  79. gotmituns says:
    @Biff

    up yours fella – I mean that only in the best way of course.

    • Replies: @ben sampson
  80. @Biff

    you have simple but broad and deep problem with reading and comprehension. you should try to do somethng about it

    • Replies: @ben sampson
  81. @Corvinus

    Actually, it was the Mongols who helped spread Chinese inventions to the West, and helped make the Far East more easily accessible to the West in general. At the price of tens of millions killed, of course.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  82. @ben sampson

    and I do wish also that Ron Unz would upgrade to a site that acutally works like it suggests it might. it can be time consuming navigating this site..a site that is interesting at times, often very literate..if we can avoid such as Devlin, Kersey and some of the rest..who truly add to the difficulty of this site, digging out the useful and valuabe kernels I sometimes find

    dodging such writers is no fun at all. once you get to know them and their content, just seeing their by-lines can be painful.

    there must be some valuable purpose for the Unz Review to persist with this racist nonsense to the extent it does…yet all I can sus are dangerous and nefarious purposes, unbecoming of Unz as far as I have come to know his site

    • Replies: @Just passing through
  83. Two contradictory observations:

    1) If music is the most sublime invention by humans then the classical “western” music is the epitome of that sublimity (other “classical” music, e.g. Chinese, Japanese, Indian etc. maybe be very good but do not measure up to the former) and at the other spectrum stands the rap “music” for which blacks are largely responsible…

    2) But if science can explain superiority of northern Europeans in almost everything, and the creativity of Germanic composers in music bears it out, then what explains the bizarre fascination of those scientifically intelligent people in the low level idea of the God and whose nefarious effects on the seemingly demise of its most fervent supporters…

    Lastly, if we all came out of Africa then what is the fuss about… surely, in another million years it will all balance out.

  84. @gotmituns

    I see! Biff is a boxer, bamming his way through the board with stiff slaps for all he perceives wrongly as he goes..in constant fighting stance cuffing away, whether he understands what he is fighting against or not!

    interesting! and Biff is white eh..with higher IQ than I have now and will ever be able to muster, achieve or pass on to my heritage… becuse I am not white forever stuck in inferiority!

    really?

    oh my! the UNZ-R feels like a bull ring right now, surrounded by a raucus multitude baying for blood, Biff at the ready to bang it out…the blood i.e

  85. @Biff

    And I’m not sure where they are getting #2. Aren’t they notable for having larger posteriors? Combined with #1, that would make #3 make more sense.

  86. @anonymous

    I watched a female relay team from Poland out sprint all the blacks from all over world. It was probably due to their collective long legs. I’m still jealous … and still short.

  87. @Corvinus

    “White inventions” or “western science”, while noteworthy in their original ideas and innovations, of course owe much to gunpowder, paper, the compass, and movable type (Chinese), to the number 0 (India), and to the idea of a rule-based, law-giving universal Creator (Middle East).

    Don’t forget fire (Homo Erectus). We owe it all to those plucky little ape-men.

    • LOL: Carroll Price
  88. Dunnyveg says:

    The intelligent position on race is to recognize that it is real, and has momentous consequences for social policy and our culture. Race is about where one’s family came from. Family is about genetics. Genetics is about biology. And biology is science. According to the transitive law, race is part of science.

    Science is something most people know little or nothing about, which is a segue into the intelligent position on what race is not. Since race is science, and science is something esoteric, race is not how we identify. The fact is that we identify by our ethnicity, which is the socio-political expression of a given culture.

    The classic example is blacks. Anybody who has spent much time around blacks is aware that African-Americans flunk the “lunch room test” since they prefer not to associate with blacks who are immigrants or are of immigrant stock. It is also the case that however many nonwhites have been killed by whites, whites have killed more of our own kind by several orders of magnitude.

  89. @Just passing through

    the national IQ of Equilateral Guinea was calculated to be 59 based on a sample of 48 children aged 10-14 taken many decades before the book was published

    The Jewish IQ estimates are based on sample sizes just as small, no one has a problem with that.

  90. If Jewishness increases one’s intelligence, Sammy Davis Jr’s IQ must have jumped 30 points after converting to Judaism?

    https://www.kveller.com/23-things-you-dont-know-about-jewish-icon-sammy-davis-jr/

    • Replies: @Franklin Ryckaert
  91. Bookish1 says:
    @Corvinus

    Who in China invented the movable type, compass, paper, etc. There were whites in China in those times so dont assume those inventions were made by ethnic chinese. My guess is that they were white inventions otherwise why would the chineses have stopped there and not invented anything since.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
    , @Juzi
  92. @Iris

    As the author suggested, the cold weather / warm weather paradigm by itself is not a sufficient explanation for all intelligence differences, or civilizational advances. The fact is that the Fertile Crescent was much more conducive to the early development of agriculture than Northern Europe was, hence its inhabitants were able to gain a leg up in the development of civilization. Their location advantage for agriculture overcame whatever IQ advantages their more northerly cousins might have had. While they had the early advantage, it did not last, as the Greeks and Romans quickly overtook the Middle Easterners. The Greeks in particular were one of the earliest European peoples to come into contact with the civilizations of the Fertile Crescent, and they were able to greatly expand on the knowledge gained from these cultures, in particular making great strides in Mathematics, Science, and Philosophy that those earlier civilizations were not able to make themselves. See Michael Hart’s “Understanding Human History” for more detailed analysis on the interplay between agriculture, northerly IQ advantages, and civilization.

    • Replies: @Iris
  93. @Monotonous Languor

    The Chinese never disseminated their discoveries to the masses of people at large. They hoarded them, sat on them, and did little in the way of additional development.

    Occam’s razor; maybe they didn’t actually invent those things first.

  94. anon[248] • Disclaimer says:
    @Bufallobiff

    As most of us learned in high school biology, evolution is not something that can be watched happening before your eyes, because it’s something based on long-term changes. Almost everyone with a basic education gets this simple fact but some people, who belong in camps, have a caved-in brain and don’t like evolution because they can’t watch it happen in front of them.

    • Replies: @Bufallobiff
  95. anon[248] • Disclaimer says:
    @EG

    Truth hurts huh bud?

  96. @Carroll Price

    There is a difference between cultural “Jewishness” (which can be adopted) and biological “Jewishness”, which cannot be adopted but only inherited genetically, but perhaps you would need the latter to understand that.

    • Replies: @Carroll Price
    , @Rex Little
  97. @ Devlin.
    Talking about winter is simplification. It requires generalization.
    People that were pushed into areas of harsher conditions had to stimulate their brains to survive.
    Eskimos are exception to the rule. Northern seashores of the continents were full of abundance of food. People there all they had to do is invent igloos. Building houses from snow. That was only one thing they needed. They did not need to stimulate their brains any more to survive.

    • Replies: @Franklin Ryckaert
  98. Mefobills says:
    @Knacker249

    Your right. Our evolutionary history has gaps that are not comprehended by out of Africa theory. Overall the author make good points though.

    Human evolution is likely much more complicated than out of Africa. There is the mounting evidence of a Hyperborean civilization that is inexplicable by current narratives.

    Neanderthal genes may not be so great in higher concentrations by the way. Our Jewish friends have a lot of latent neanderthalic characteristics, including physiognomy.

  99. @Really No Shit

    “…then what explains the bizarre fascination of those scientifically intelligent people in the low level idea of the God and whose nefarious effects on the seemingly demise of its most fervent supporters…”

    What do you mean with that?

    “…Lastly, if we all came out of Africa then what is the fuss about… surely, in another million years it will all balance out…”

    Let us hope it will not “balance out” by humanity becoming one big mass of Mulattos.

    • Replies: @Just passing through
  100. @Ilyana_Rozumova

    Another reason is that in those extremely northern regions the practice of agriculture was impossible. So those people always stayed on the hunter-gatherer level of civilization. The practice of agriculture is the sine qua non of all higher development.

  101. @Really No Shit

    1)Rap music is largely pushed upon the public by Jewish record labels. I would regard jazz music as quite good (not Beethoven but nevertheless pleasing to the ears)

    2) Intelligence doesn’t mean rationality. In fact there is evidence to suggest more intelligent people are more likely to believe in irrational but cleverly formulates and esoteric concepts.

    3)If Africans were exposed to the elements of Europe for the next thousands of years, the intelligent ones would survive. However due to technology, evolution has more or less halted. This was the main reason for the growth of eugenics, to offset the effects of the industrial revolution.

    Ironically eugenics would be the best way tackle racial inequality. Just imagine if all the stupid Blacks were sterilised, crime would fall and the more intelligent blacks would be allowed to make up the difference.

  102. anon[248] • Disclaimer says:
    @Monotonous Languor

    Best comment in the thread.

    How I wish so many conservatives would understand this crucial point.
    They don’t and it’s why we can’t have nice things

  103. @Franklin Ryckaert

    Let us hope it will not “balance out” by humanity becoming one big mass of Mulattos.

    I often here this sentiment but I do not understand how this could actually be possible, most races seem to prefer their own when it comes to reproducing. Looking at the UK census data for example, it may alarm some to see over 1 million people in the “mixed” category but in reality most of these relationships are between different non-White ethnic groups. Only 4% of White British are in inter-ethnic relationships and to add to this, UK census counts relationships between White British and “other White” (Irish, French German etc) as mixed marriages, so in reality way fewer than 4% of White British people are in mixed relationships. I imagine the same is true in the USA.

    Also, do you really think White women are going to start having babies with fresh off the boat Africans? Of course what is happening in regards to mass immigration is bad but surely the “everyone in the future will be a mulatto” is just fear-mongering?

    • Replies: @Anon
  104. jamie b. says:
    @Bufallobiff

    Are racial differences purely a matter of genetic drift?

  105. anon[248] • Disclaimer says:
    @Intelligent Dasein

    Aww so sorry your wittle fee-fees got hurt when the Mean Men said a bunch of mean stuff about your people. But it doesn’t change FACTS. Go sit in a corner somewhere and deal with it.

    • Replies: @Anon
  106. @ben sampson

    Articles on race and IQ are interesting in my opinion, and it is good Unz features them, but articles such as this one are pretty poor quality and although it brands itself as a “rational” guide that is new and was written after much deliberation of the evidence at hand, it is in reality just repeating the old Lynn data sets and sticking a new label on them to make it feel new.

    • Replies: @ben sampson
  107. Iris says:
    @Hapalong Cassidy

    The Greeks in particular were one of the earliest European peoples to come into contact with the civilizations of the Fertile Crescent, and they were able to greatly expand on the knowledge gained from these cultures, in particular making great strides in Mathematics, Science, and Philosophy

    You chose the discipline which evolution proves the exact contrary of the point you are trying to make.

    Antiquity witnessed the emergence of two forms of mathematics:
    – In Sumer, mathematics used to measure, which translated into tables and abacuses.
    – In Egypt, mathematics used for construction, which translated into the erection of Pyramids and Temples still standing to the day.

    Geometry is the earliest form of mathematical knowledge; it preceded Algebra by several centuries. It is also the field about which we are certain that knowledge transferred from the Egyptians towards the Greeks, not the other way around.

    Of the most brilliant Greek scientists involved in mathematical knowledge, Thales, Pythagoras, Democritus, Eudoxe, Plato, all, without exception, spent years studying in Egypt, learning about “Sacred Geometry”.

    Fundamental mathematical principles such as Pythagoras’s theorem, the Golden number, trigonometry, were undisputedly known and used by “black” people of Ancient Egypt, long before being “invented” by the Greeks. The evidence is ancient Egyptian architectural design, which could not have been achieved otherwise.

    The interesting point is that Ancient Greeks never denied the importance of Africa/Asia in the ascent of the wonderful Greek Civilisation. Such dismissal and re-writing of History under a Euro-centric viewpoint started at the beginning of the 19th Century, when it became necessary to justify colonialism.

    • Agree: Bliss
  108. CanSpeccy says: • Website

    The author writes with some awareness of the evolutionary processes underlying human diversity and group conflict, but talks the usual rubbish about group variation in intelligence.

    IQ does not measure intelligence, it measures ability to do IQ tests, a task that undoubtedly requires intelligence, but of only a particular kind, and that of a kind subject to modification by cultural and other environmental factors.

    Intelligence is multifaceted as consideration of the plain language definition of intelligence makes immediately clear:

    Intelligence, n.: the ability to acquire and apply knowledge and skills.

    Thus, the intelligence manifest in the skill of the surgeon is not the same as the intelligence manifest by the historian’s ability to assimilate and instructively deploy knowledge of past events, which is quite different from the physicist’s capacity for abstraction, or the poets gift for rhyme and rhythm.

    The assumption that the innate intelligence of humans, whether as individuals or races, can be compared based on a quick paper and pencil test of mainly verbal and mathematical reasoning scored with a single number, without regard to cultural background or education is, frankly, not very intelligent.

  109. Anonymous[255] • Disclaimer says:
    @trelane

    Nonsense. Evolution, if it exists, would favor the most “fit” for the environment. How is being both stupid and having excess-babies an advantage in a modern, high-tech, literate, digital era?

    • Replies: @CanSpeccy
  110. @Liza

    You’ve obviously never been in an American niggra house in February.

  111. Agent76 says:

    Nov 13, 2014 Public School: A Conspiracy Against Ourselves

    “Solve this problem and school will heal itself: children know that schooling is not fair, not honest, not driven by integrity. They know they are devalued in classes and grades,1 that the institution is indifferent to them as individuals. The rhetoric of caring contradicts what school procedure and content say, that many children have no tolerable future and most have a sharply proscribed one.

    Jan 2, 2014 The Dumbing Down of America (The Best of J.T. Gatto Interlude)

  112. Corvinus says:
    @Bookish1

    “There were whites in China during those times so don’t assume those inventions were made by ethnic Chinese”

    Lol so what sources are you basing this statement on?

    • Replies: @Really No Shit
  113. fredtard says:
    @Bufallobiff

    Short-generation-time organisms such as pathogenic bacteria, crop-destroying insects, and noxious weeds have “evolved” antibiotic, insecticide, and herbicide resistance just during my adult life.

  114. Corvinus says:
    @Hapalong Cassidy

    So at least you are smart enough to acknowledge that those four inventions were developed by ethnic Chinese.

    And I never disputed the role of the Mongols in spreading Chinese innovations.

    Certainly the Mongols caused millions of deaths as they expanded their empire, much like the Greeks, the Romans, and more recently Europeans.

    It’s in our DNA.

  115. joeamer says:
    @Bufallobiff

    actually, there are many instances of observable evolution, including biological evolution. you have probably seen the bug called a silverfish crawling around your bathtub or somewhere in your abode. they are generally colored silvery gray. in my house, there are two cats that for lack of better prey, will sometimes find a silverfish bug and follow it around, play with it, and sometimes eat it, but in most cases the bug winds up a goner. after installing beige carpeting throughout my house, i started to notice beige colored silverfish bugs. and now, after a few years, there are no silver gray bugs remaining. they are all the exact color of my carpeting. the cats were/are a selective pressure causing the silverfish to mutate their phenotypic color from silver gray to beige. because it is more difficult for the cats to see and find the bugs with their new camouflage coloring.

  116. joeamer says:
    @Knacker249

    explain neanderthal – the author mentions that several migrations occurred northward from africa. the neanderthals are a group that derived from a much earlier migration of people northward out of africa, then evolved (accumulated beneficial mutations) under totally different conditions found in the north. early humans and protohumans were extremely diverse in their characteristics.

  117. @Kratoklastes

    This all begs the question of what it means to be a “Jew.”

  118. They haven’t evolved, they have adapted. That is the problem with the way Darwin’s theory is interpreted. At the end of the day, Darwin’s finches were still bird/finches, not turtles or seals, and your insects are still insects, not birds or rodents.

    The much maligned James Watson observed that there is so much we do not know about the different combinations of DNA and their placement in sequencing. I would suggest that he knows a little more about genetics than most of us. Given animals share 90% of DNA, there are 10s of millions of combinations of DNA, and there are African tribes whose DNA is closer to Bonobo apes than Europeans, his statement becomes self evident. Put into an economic perspective, insurance companies generally operate on a 2% margin – not a lot. However, when tens of millions come in every day, that 2% becomes massive over a year.

    I have never bought into the out of Africa theory. The fact that no “African” has Neanderthal DNA, and that North American Indians have the highest proportion of Neanderthal and Denisovian DNA (virtually unknown in Africa) indicates multiple human origins. By the way, I also do not buy into the no humans in the Americas before 15,000 years ago theory. Today, most researchers are handcuffed by preconceptions. If out of Africa is the centrepoint, then all discoveries that don’t fit that paradigm are either rejected or force fit. To adapt an old saying, if the only tool you have is a hammer, then everything looks like a nail.

    As for the “racist” narrative, another much maligned person of reason, Enoch Powell, responed to a question asking him if he were a racist, answering: If by racist, you mean a person who recognizes there are differences between races, then yes, I am a racist. If, by racist, you mean that one race is inherently better than another, then no, I am not a racist. It all seems self evident to me, but then I’m just an old boomer.

    • Agree: Carroll Price
    • Replies: @roonaldo
  119. @Franklin Ryckaert

    My opinion is that domestication of sheep and cows and eventually horses was the most important event in development of humanity. And I do think it did happen very long before event of agriculture.
    Domestication of these species did not impede the nomadic way of life practiced by early tribes.
    On American continent these species were missing and that was the reason for arrested development of native American people. Although they did develop agriculture of corn and potatoes.

    Domestication of chicken, goose and ducks, (generally poultry ) did happen after development of agriculture, which ended the nomadic life, and also gave birth to the cities.

    • Replies: @Franklin Ryckaert
  120. @anon

    It irks the indoctrinated when truth is thrown in front of them. Not one species has ever been “caught in the act” of evolution. Reams of debate from the allegedly educated will not change this fact. I’ll be returning to camp now………

  121. CanSpeccy says: • Website
    @Anonymous

    How is being both stupid and having excess-babies an advantage in a modern, high-tech, literate, digital era?

    It takes advantage of the European commitment to multiculturalism through mass immigration.

    And if you are talking of Africans, stupidity and high fertility are not necessarily correlated as the superior academic performance of immigrant African children to London demonstrates.

    What is stupid is boasting of one’s innate intellectual superiority while tolerating the genocide of one’s own group through suppressed fertility and mass replacement immigration.

  122. Chinaman says:

    It is funny that white people like to claim Jews have the highest IQ at 112. May be because Ashkenazi Jews are a branch of Europeans and it makes them feel better about themselves. If we look at IQ of different Chinese provinces, Shanghai and Zhenjiang province stand out with an IQ of almost 115. ( Norm against other Chinese provinces, it would be 120 using “Greenwich” IQ) It is just wishful thinking to assume homogeneity amongst 1.3 billion Chinese.

    I love it when White people say that Asians are conformist, unimaginative and only good at copying. Please keep repeating that like a mantra. Stay in that comfort zone. Asians can never catch up or create anything without white people. Please don’t feel threatened by us. You know, The device you are using to read\type this now are invariably made in Asia but they are designed by white people of course. Huawei and Samsung‘s stole the idea of foldable smartphones before Steve Jobs died China stole intellectual property from American companies because…There is no 5g without 3G…so this is not about the actual technology but the naming rights!

    It took China only 40 years to catch up to America but it is ludicrous to suggest that China can surpass America. How can the Chinese compete in fields such as Quantum computing, Robotics, Renewable energy or CRISPR ?

    I guess the only thing going for China is that there is no equivalent of the Unz website to whine about the decline and disintegration of the West.

    Only a superior race like Whites have the mental capacity and deep introspection that is required for self loathing!

  123. @Ilyana_Rozumova

    The nomadic way of life seems more primitive than the settled agricultural way of life and thus seems “older” than agriculture. However, as far as I know, current opinion of ethnologists is that agriculture is older than nomadism, which is a out-growth of the former. First plants and animals were domesticated at the same time. Then with the domestication of herd animals, the nomadic way of life became possible in regions otherwise unfit for habitation.

    Thus in the Middle East the Semites developed first agriculture in the Fertile Crescent. Only after they domesticated sheep and cows and tamed an animal to ride on, the camel, did they swarm out into the Syrian and Arabian deserts. The camel was tamed only about 1000BC, while agriculture in the Fertile Crescent is at least 8000 years older.

    Similarly the original Indo-Europeans were not nomads but agriculturalists. Only after they domesticated herd animals and tamed horses for riding, did a part of them, the Indo-Iranians, swarm out into the steppes of Central Asia from where they eventually invaded Iran and India. Significantly the Indo-Iranian languages have no terms for agricultural concepts cognate with the other Indo-European languages. They had to construct those terms independently when they settled down in Iran and India.

  124. @Alfred

    What were you doing in Nigeria? Was hell closed for renovation?

  125. @Rahan

    Great idea.
    I think we need to start lobbying for tax credits for Jews and East Asians who marry and reproduce.
    It will mongrelise the AshKanNazi’s and make them somewhat amenable to the Chinese. We could eventually use it as a tool in trade negotiations. I can just see Trumpenstein using it as a club to wack Xi over the head.
    ‘No more anti-semitism against the Mongrel-Nazis.’
    Just a quick score card:
    1. the Jews have used USD (12Billion) to buy up Ukraine.
    2. The Jews have bought up large chunks of Patagonia
    3. They are positioning themselves to be able to move into China and other East Asian countries through miscegenation.
    4. They have Israel but, despite destroying wide swathes of the Middle East, are terrified of the Persians.
    5. The U.S. is their cash-cow which is quickly dying of a parasitic infestation.

    It must be really hard to be so despised.

  126. Miro23 says:
    @anarchyst

    As far as I am concerned, us whites have done enough self-flagellation, having given up our own birthright, sacrificing it on the (false) altars of “civil-rights (for some)” and “anti-discrimination” laws that benefit only minorities.

    It seems to me that guilt and self-flagellation are a big part of Christian European history. The medieval Church made sure that everyone knew from an early age that they were sinners and “born guilty” (culpable for the death of Christ).

    It was a great control mechanism- considering that the only route to redemption was through the Church itself – the Church controlling key event such as christenings, burials and marriages. They were carefully allied to temporal power (the aristocracy – taking their youngest sons) and gave legitimacy to feudalism and kingship itself.

    Result that Ex-Christian European populations are probably uniquely vulnerable to “guilt tripping” attacks since they know how they work – and may even be genetically adapted to them after centuries of intensive exposure.

    • Replies: @anarchyst
  127. @Anonymous

    “When it comes to East Asians, I choose the Jews who are incomparably more genetically and culturally related to white Europeans.”

    Bwahahahahahaha. I’m dying here.

    Nothing says ‘culturally related’ like centuries-long efforts to undermine and subvert host cultures.

    Overseas Chinese blend in, run restaurants, amass wealth and don’t cause problems apart from engaging in various forms of fraud. They most certainly don’t push transgenderism, feminism, pedophilia, crackpot theories of repressed incestual desires, etc etc. Nor do they gain control of key industries and lock other people out (e.g., Hollywood and its deplorable treatment of Walt Disney).

    I’ll take the Chinese anyday.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  128. @Chinaman

    “It is funny that white people like to claim Jews have the highest IQ at 112. May be because Ashkenazi Jews are a branch of Europeans and it makes them feel better about themselves. If we look at IQ of different Chinese provinces, Shanghai and Zhenjiang province stand out with an IQ of almost 115”

    First, Jews aren’t white. They disclaim whiteness, as you can see by reading any number of commentaries or newspaper articles. They aren’t a ‘branch of Europeans’, they merely have some Italian ancestry.

    Second, we don’t think they are the highest. Some of the studies showing high Jewish IQ are bunk, such as the one that used students from three decidedly high functioning schools. (The author of that study even stated outright that the results could not be generalized to the whole population).

    Various studies have shown Episcopalians to clock in at even higher average scores.

    Besides, Jews have massive dysgenic fertility problems. The orthodox have kids, but liberal jews don’t, particularly females. 50% interbreeding rates. Whatever studies were done years ago are no longer useful today.

    For a person who obviously considers themselves to be superior, you seem to have a whole lot of trouble differentiating between white people and Jewish people. They are not us, they disclaim white identity, they try to subvert and undermine our civilizations.

    You might want to do some digging into who was running the opium trade into China. That might cure you of your philo-semitism.

    • Replies: @ricpic
    , @Biff
  129. @Franklin Ryckaert

    I do not like to really argue , but I still would like to point out this.
    Camels are used mainly for transportation of humans and gods. So using the domestication of Camels as a revolutionary point in human development is of lesser importance
    Spread of agriculture was fully dependent on tools made from metal. You cannot tilt the earth with stone tools. So agriculture can be timed at beginning of bronze age.
    For domestication of animals, particularly sheep and cows and goats, all people needed was a rope.
    Even in the Stone age people with stone tools were able to cut rope from skin of animals.
    And I do have to remind you that milk is far more important for humanity than transportation.
    And it is possible that first domestic animals were goats for milking that increased survive ability
    of children.
    Logic dictates this to me and I do not know if it can be proven by excavations.
    …….
    Another thing here is that people could keep animals alive for later consumption. and again all they did need is a rope.

    • Replies: @Franklin Ryckaert
  130. Skeptikal says:
    @Bufallobiff

    That is not true.
    A species of moth in northern England was observed to develop a variant strain with dark-gray wings, which provided better camouflage in smoke-dulled surfaces of the industrial north. Pretty soon the darker-winged moths predominated.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peppered_moth_evolution

  131. @Biff

    Glad somebody else noticed. Not the only anomaly in the scratch the crap article.

    • Replies: @PetrOldSack
  132. @PetrOldSack

    Probably the smaller skull, and bigger buttocks proportionality is offset positively as to the longer legs. That would make the “lower center of gravity” not an independent causality factor. Bad list, copy past style journalism.

  133. @Franklin Ryckaert

    The camel was tamed only about 1000BC

    If so the horse must have been tamed a lot earlier:

    Chariots are thought to have been first used as a weapon in Egypt by the Hyksos in the 16th century BC, though investigation of materials long held in the Tahrir Square Egyptian Museum has potentially revealed the presence of chariots as early as the Old Kingdom (c. 2686–2181 BC).

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chariotry_in_ancient_Egypt

  134. @ben sampson

    Ben,

    Nobody likes to hear or read bad things about their own people. Obviously these are generalisations to which there are exceptions; the question is whether there is any truth to them.

    Paul Kersey has decided to focus specifically on black on white violence in contemporary USA and I can’t see why such a theme should be off limits especially if backed with statistics. If he happens to save someone’s life by making them aware of the issue then he is doing a commendable public service with his articles. I wouldn’t object to someone else reporting similarly on white on black violence and if it were to encourage blacks to stay away from whites as a consequence well so be it. No?

    • Replies: @ben sampson
    , @Bliss
  135. @Ilyana_Rozumova

    “…Spread of agriculture was fully dependent on tools made from metal. You cannot tilt the earth with stone tools. So agriculture can be timed at beginning of bronze age…”

    Agriculture started in the Middle East in the Neolithic Period (“New Stone Age”) , about 9500 BC. The Bronze Age in the Middle East lasted from 3300-1200 BC. You don’t need metal to plough the earth. You can plough the earth with wooden ploughs. Here is an ancient Egyptian model of a wooden plough :

    And here is an actual ancient Egyptian wooden plough :

    Nomadism, i.e. full reliance on herd animals, trekking through an area unfit for agriculture, is an outgrowth of the settled agricultural way of life, and thus a later stage of development.

    • Replies: @Ilyana_Rozumova
  136. anarchyst says:
    @Miro23

    You make a good point about “control by the Church”, but having come of age in the 1950s and 1960, pre-Vatican II, supporting ones race was seen as honorable. One could be a good Catholic and still give preference to ones own race. That all changed with Vatican II.
    Regards,

  137. ricpic says:

    Who’s that Brit, now living in Finland, who claims the secret of white success in dominating the world in terms of high achievements can be laid at what he calls the genius strategy? Can’t think of his name. Very witty fella. YouTube sensation.

  138. ricpic says:
    @jbwilson24

    So that’s it? Jews deny they are white and that establishes that they are not white? Do you believe that simply averring something makes it so? I’m Jewish and I’m pastier than 9 out of 10 Irishmen.

  139. @Chinaman

    “…It took China only 40 years to catch up to America but it is ludicrous to suggest that China can surpass America…”

    So why did it take those superintelligent Chinese so long to come to the conclusion that communism is not the way to go, complete with its disastrous “Great Leap Forward” and its murderous “Cultural Revolution” by the all-wise, still venerated “Great Helmsman” Mao Ze Dong?

    Here is a picture of a recent colossal golden statue of Mao :

    And here is a colossal head of that still venerated “genius”, whose policies were responsible for the death of some 70 million people :

    Pious Chinese people with statues of theirMao :

    http://prod-upp-image-read.ft.com/8de34868-84d0-11e6-8897-2359a58ac7a5

    Please report us when the superintelligent Chinese finally have rejected that bizarre cult of their prime tormentor.

    • Replies: @Chinaman
  140. Uslabor says:
    @Liza

    You’re not so special. Everbody’s ancestors had to sink or swim.

    • Replies: @Liza
  141. @Franklin Ryckaert

    He He!!!!!!
    You just defeated yourself.
    Those two animals pulling the plow appearing to be ox’s.
    Ox is castrated bull.
    I would think that it took hundreds of years maybe thousands until people did figure out that castrating bulls will make them docile.
    ………………………………………………..
    This is maybe beside the point, but situation in Egypt was unique. As we know banks of Nile are totally fertile sediments ( silt ), and all around and below it is thick layer of sand.
    That kind of soil is relatively easy to plow even with wooden ones.
    This condition you do not find anywhere in the world.
    ………………………………………………
    I rest my case!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    p.s.
    Goats and Lambs were much easyer to capture domesticate and breed.
    Without food people die like any other living organism.
    Even nomadic people did have temporary settlements usually on banks of rivers.
    Fish was considerable part of their life sustaining diet.

    (And milk milk milk for children.)

  142. @Franklin Ryckaert

    Judaism is one branch of an Abrahamic religion, with Islam being the other. There’s no such thing as biological Jews or Muslims.

  143. @Franklin Ryckaert

    Why are Jews and Chinese more intelligent when Israel and Southern China are warmer than Northern France or Germany?

    If cold weather is the root of all mental development, why are people from the Mediterranean desert and the semi-tropical China possessed of a higher IQ on average?

  144. @Just passing through

    that too is my point..the quality of the work presented on the Unz pages. what is Kersey up? care to specualte what is Kersyes purpose with his relentless racism in his corner of th Umz?

    What Paul Kersey does is racism not scientific anything, useful only to create trouble. and because of the rotten quality of what I see here relative to race especilly when Black people are targeted I must ask as a Black many myself.. what is the Unz up because I can detect nothing positive to it all..why does Unz carry such people as Kersey and this guy here and now?

    people are indeed fed up of the rotten insincere discussion on race that flows from the elitist quarters. there is good useful work out there on the subject of race.

    I anticipated that Ron Unz would have prided himself to such an extent that he would seek useful quality work for his sing and discourage the vulgar nonsense. but that isnt what Unz is doing..he is doing the exact opposite. why?

    Devlin, Derbyshire at times and Kersey bring the intent and purpose and activity of the Unz Review under serious suspicion

  145. @anonymous

    “When does ‘diversity’ end? When are Whites allowed borders? If not at 10% of the global population, how about 5%? At 0.01%?”

    Whenever our Jewish Masters say so. The White Race is on the road to extinction. The Jews believe that they will control of all mankind and are close to it. There is only one problem with their theory that they can destroy all civilization by using Blacks and Muslims to do their dirty work. Their ideas that they can “control” these groups may show otherwise. The New York attacks by blacks on Jews both Ashkenazi and Orthodox is increasing. The blacks know that these Orthodox Slum Landlords are their enemies and are now showing the Jews what they maybe in for in the future. The Jews have also played a “magic hand” by thinking they will control Muslims. According to intelligence sources (that I have talked to) at least 20% of the Muslims in America are terrorists waiting to happen. Also, another 10 to 15% are potential terrorists. The theory espoused by both the Bush and Obama administrations is that law enforcement can work with the Imams to find these among the Muslim population! Good luck with that!

    In the 7th century the Jews at Banu Qurayza (now called Medina) thought they had made a deal with the Muslims but Mohammed had other plans. The Jews have played a dangerous game and have always lied their way out of things by invoking discrimination, antisemitism, holocaust denial, and host of other sleight of hand diversions to fool the goy but they might get a surprise in the end. Whites are afraid to do much of anything and Jews which are supposedly discriminated against have managed to control most of the world’s social, economic and political pathways with a minute population but no one ever challenges how they do it.

  146. @Commentator Mike

    ‘Save somebodys life!! Kersey with his inciting racist nonsense?’

    Kersey is more likely to get people killed by the work he does. to save lives we must get to the root and truth of the racial problem, and with positive intent, expose it to the world to help gell conclusion and corrective effort.

    is that what Kersy is doing? is Kerseys intent positive? I dont think so!!

    • Replies: @Commentator Mike
  147. Biff says:
    @jbwilson24

    Some of the studies showing high Jewish IQ are bunk

    Hey, the Jews bought and paid for their high IQ status, so let them have it – it cost(the Europeans) billions.

  148. F. Roger Devlin thinks he’s intelligent. Because he’s him. And you bozos think you’re intelligent. Because you is you. (And for no other reason. Like actually being intelligent.)

    And so naturally you support “science” or whatever it really is, that supports the contention that people like you are intelligent. (Even though you really aren’t.)

    Bias is such a pathetic childishly obvious solipsistic thing.

  149. @EG

    Name everything in your house that was NOT invented by a white male. Let us know which were invented by Asians, Africans, etc.

    • Replies: @Eg
  150. @Jeff Stryker

    For its latitude, Southern China does get relatively cold weather. Shanghai (roughly the dividing point between Northern and Southern China) in spite being at roughly the same latitude as Jacksonville Florida, has the same January mean temperature as Paris.

    • Replies: @Hippopotamusdrome
  151. once upon a time, there was one giant turtle who carried the planet on its back. then 1.8 million years ago, i stopped reading.

    • Replies: @Truth
  152. Truth says:
    @Anonymous

    When it comes to East Asians, I choose the Jews who are incomparably more genetically and culturally related to white Europeans.

    Well that’s nice, because they have definitely chosen you, over the Chinese…

  153. Chinaman says:
    @Franklin Ryckaert

    I think you are confused. It was not Mao per se. it was western communist Ideology and the failure of the command economy which lead to that humanitarian disaster.

    There is nothing more dangerous than western political ideology in the world of ideas. It have killed more Chinese than any guns and opium that White people have used on us. In the 19th century, nationalism was the future so China became a republic which lead to the civil war and Jap invasion when the Ching dynasty collapsed. Then communism came in vogue so China became communist. Western powers is trying to foist Democracy upon us like when they are already abandoning it. It seems like we are coming full circle and going back to fascism and Nazism again in the form of alt-right. We won’t fall for it again.

  154. Bliss says:
    @Commentator Mike

    Nobody likes to hear or read bad things about their own people. Obviously these are generalisations to which there are exceptions; the question is whether there is any truth to them.

    Here is a generalization with a great deal of truth in it: white men of european extraction (who are the least spiritual of all the races) are by far the worst sexual perverts and predators. You will almost invariably find that it is a white “upstanding member of the community” (priests, pastors, teachers, cops, coaches, businessmen, firemen etc) who has been busted for child pornography, child rape, snuff videos, torture videos and so on. Just google it everyday and confirm for yourself. These men are guilty of the worst crimes of all. I wouldn’t be surprised if Paul Kersey is one of them. So shouldn’t somebody be posting pictures of these wicked white pedophile criminals here too on a daily basis along with descriptions of their crimes? Wouldn’t that be fair?

  155. Truth says:
    @anno nimus

    Wow, you’re that old, your health insurance premium must be through the roof!

  156. @ben sampson

    Kersey doesn’t create those events and that data – he just reports them – and I can’t see what’s wrong with that? Why should he hide it? At the most it will encourage whites to stay among their own and not to go out seeking retaliation or revenge. OK, it could encourage some odd white spree killer but I doubt that even those significantly skew the statistics.

    I’ve lived in different communities and countries and yes, generally all-white communities and countries tend to feel safer to the extent that one can drop situational awareness altogether (or almost so) in public places, if one is white at least. On the other hand, black and immigrant communities, and countries where they hail from, tend to be more violent, to extremely violent. In fact many sensible blacks are well aware of this too and some try to get out specifically because of the violence, and find that putting up with some racism and hostility in all-white communities is preferable to staying among their own. I’ve spoken to some blacks in the past who were well aware that black society is more violent and corrupt than white society, and many didn’t see how this could be corrected or a way out other than getting themselves out.

    Sure whites can be violent in wars, but again because of the efficiency of the weapons, usually by remote at a distance; others are far more vicious close up in conflict.

    to save lives we must get to the root and truth of the racial problem, and with positive intent, expose it to the world to help gell conclusion and corrective effort.

    I agree, and I thought authors such as these encourage that, although what they put forward as reasons, roots, truths, may be debatable, but how many programmes, affirmative actions, laws, etc. have already been passed and is it getting better? And they’re opening borders and letting more in without even having solved the problem of those already in-country.

    Agree or disagree but censoring authors like these on UR or wherever isn’t the answer. Seeing that such authors are widely censored in the MSM, I think it’s fair that they can publish these reports in the alternative media. It’s like saying that the anti-black crimes of colonialism, imperialism, slavery shouldn’t be taught and discussed because they may encourage black on white violence. And maybe they do but so what? It’s just as unpalatable for whites to listen to all those accusations of past crimes being rolled out and you can see the reactions here (some deny them, some blame the Jews for them, some accept them, and so on).

    But yes, overall blacks are the biggest victims of black crime, and whites of white crime, at least when they’re among their own.

    • Replies: @ben sampson
  157. @Bliss

    Why do so many black teen girls have STD’s then?

  158. Good article,but:
    Remains of the first upright walking hominid,supposedly 11.6 million years old,have been found in Bavaria,Germany in 2015.They named him Danuvius guggenmosi.

  159. And not a single one of the fields has produced anything resembling actual evidence for anything evolving anywhere.

    As with the author, one uses adaptations of human development as indicators of various races. That is incorrect. What makes the error curious is that for all the buggy riding on genetics, there seems to be some confusion over the genetics oh what constitutes the human race.

    ————————–

    “Few blacks are even literate.”

    I deliberately sought out the worst literacy scores for the black population as low 44% A rough guess, some 25 million people is not a few.

  160. Exile says:
    @Bufallobiff

    There are legitimate issues with the details of evolution theory as presently understood (e.g. are purely random mutation and natural selection the sole driving forces). The fact that the process happens isn’t legitimately debatable.

  161. Exile says:
    @Bliss

    How much of that perversion and violence is (((fellow Whites)))?

    Look at the Bolsheviks, Weimar, Freudian psychology and today’s “sexual liberation” fads. White or (((Fellow White)))?

    Who celebrates the outright genocide of their enemy tribes in their holidays e.g Purim? Whites or (((Fellow Whites)))?

    Ignorance is Bliss, or should I say “bris?”

  162. @Jeff Stryker

    Chinese, Koreans and Japanese are intelligent because their ancestors developed in a very cold climate somewhere in inner Asia. Where the Chinese live now, such as the warmer region of South China, does not have an effect on the DNA they inherited from their ancestors who came from a colder region. Singapore is almost on the Equator, but its Chinese inhabitants are still intelligent.

    As for the intelligence of Jews, that has nothing to do with the “Mediterranean desert”, but with a special development of Jews in Europe. Arabs have on average an IQ of 85 (just like American Blacks), and so do Jews from the Arab world. That is why the average IQ of Israel is comparatively low (94), because half of its Jewish population consists of Oriental Jews. It is only the European Jews who developed a high IQ, due to the following reasons: 1)Jewish communities in Europe were founded by Jewish traders from Palestine who married local women (that has been demonstrated by DNA research). Since they were wealthy they are likely to have married European women of the higher classes, who were themselves of above average intelligence. 2) The Jewish way of life in trade and finance itself promoted the development of high intelligence, 3) The Jews had/have a culture of learning. Jewish boys were encouraged to study (Talmud). The most gifted students didn’t have to worry about finding a job. They were married off to daughters of rich men, so they could continue with their studies, but they were encouraged to have many children. Thus the practice of marrying intellect with money and encouraging procreation worked like a breeding program for high IQ. This is especially true of members of the rabbi class. Many famous Jewish intellectuals (such as Marx and Freud) are descendants of rabbis and the name Cohen among Jews is widely spread. So the high IQ of European Jews is due to special cultural and not physical environmental circumstances.

  163. @Chinaman

    So why did those intelligent Chinese adopt the failing ideology of communism in the first place, and why do those intelligent Chinese still (literally!) worship Mao, even after they have found a better way to develop their economy?

  164. “The fact that the process happens isn’t legitimately debatable.”

    So the response to there’s no actual evidence of evolution is: it’s nor debatable because it happens. That was one of Dr. Darwin’s responses, essentially prove it doesn’t happen. Yet, this form of argument is flawed. Because it asks to prove something that is not a fact doesn’t exist. It’s the ol’ prive a negative.

    What you have with evolution is theory in which something considered plausible hasn’t been demonstrated (species shift/jump) is used to fill in the blank spaces. A useful imaginative possibility — but not a fact.

    • Replies: @Theodore
    , @roonaldo
  165. @Franklin Ryckaert

    There is a difference between cultural “Jewishness” (which can be adopted) and biological “Jewishness”, which cannot be adopted but only inherited genetically

    There’s also a good deal of confusion that makes its way into discussions because the same words (“Jew” and “Jewish”) are used for both the religion and the ancestry. I’d like to see a separate word–I propose “Judaian”–used to refer to the religion, with “Jew” and “Jewish” reserved for the ancestry.

    There was a time when the distinction didn’t matter, because nearly all Jews were Judaians and vice versa. But today in the US? I don’t have figures, but I’d guess that less than half of even full-blooded Jews are practicing Judaians. My own extended family is full Ashkenazi, but we have more practicing Christians than Judaians.

    • Replies: @Franklin Ryckaert
  166. @Bliss

    I’m not sure whites are worse than others in that respect but it definitely shouldn’t be covered up and if it helps improve the safety and security of children then it deserves to be publicised. It would only reveal how sick society is becoming which most readers of UR would want to see exposed. Just look at how many articles and comments have been published about the Epstein scandal and readers are clamouring to know who all the culprits were but the FBI is not revealing.

  167. Eg says:
    @cylindrical crown

    Rather than carrying on this conversation based on pseudo-scholarship and anecdotal evidence, I would recommend that you consult actual reliable data before you make statements.

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
  168. @Rex Little

    The proper name for the Jewish religion is Judaism, so a practitioner of that faith could be called a Judaist. Members of the Jewish ethnic group are simply Jews. The problem with the Jewish identity is that it is originally a religious identity, which became an ethnic identity. Conversion to the Jewish religion entails becoming a member of the ethnic community. A loss of religious identity tends to weaken the motivation to maintain the ethnic identity. See the high rate of intermarriage of secular Jews in the US. A religious identity that became an ethnic identity is not unique to Jews. Druzes, Parsis and Sikhs are other examples. For them too, loss of faith tends to lead to loss of ethnic identity.

    • Replies: @Rex Little
  169. @Iris

    Ancient Egyptians were Black Africans from Nubia (Northern Sudan).

    Not according to DNA evidence.

    https://www.shh.mpg.de/423779/mummy-genomes

    The Nubian dynasty was viewed as foreign to Egyptians.

  170. Theodore says:
    @EliteCommInc.

    Evolution is a fact. The Theory of Evolution by Natural Selection is our best explanation for the fact of evolution. This “Theory” would never become a “fact” or “law” because that’s not how science works.

    Read: http://notjustatheory.com/

  171. Theodore says:
    @Iris

    Ancient Egyptians were Black Africans from Nubia (Northern Sudan).

    They were certainly “Africans” and overwhelmingly Caucasoid. They are clearly not “Black” – you can see the Blacks above them in that image.

    Read:
    http://racialreality.blogspot.com/2019/10/ancient-egyptians-nubians-caucasoid.html

    • Replies: @Ilyana_Rozumova
  172. @Theodore

    Every powerful civilization center eventually becomes a melting pot from different races and nations.
    And so it was also Egypt.

    • Replies: @Theodore
  173. Theodore says:
    @Ilyana_Rozumova

    Modern Egyptians (who are seen as “caucasian”) have more sub-Saharan African (Negroid) admixture than ancient Egyptians on the aggregate

    https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms15694

    “Our analyses reveal that ancient Egyptians shared more ancestry with Near Easterners than present-day Egyptians, who received additional sub-Saharan admixture in more recent times”

    • Replies: @Iris
  174. @Franklin Ryckaert

    The problem with the Jewish identity is that it is originally a religious identity, which became an ethnic identity. Conversion to the Jewish religion entails becoming a member of the ethnic community. A loss of religious identity tends to weaken the motivation to maintain the ethnic identity.

    All true, but there’s also genetic identity, which doesn’t change. “Jew” and “Jewish” are commonly used to refer to that as well, leading to the confusion I was talking about. An extreme example is the Carroll Price comment @91 that you replied to.

    • Replies: @Franklin Ryckaert
  175. anarchyst says:
    @Bliss

    Whites may be getting “busted” for various perversions, but it is JEWS who run sites that push these “perversions” on gentile whites.
    In fact, it is JEWS who perfected cruel, perverted torture techniques from antiquity through the middle ages to bolshevism and communism.
    Blaming gentile whites for perversions is akin to blaming spoons for rosie o’donnell’s obesity.
    JEWS run the pornography, white slavery, and LGBTQXYZ industries, lock stock and barrel…

    • Replies: @Bliss
  176. johnm33 says:

    With the regrowth of the Amazon forest after disease[?] wiped out the civilisations in place the uakari monkey spread with the forest, as they spread it was always the less assertive less ‘adult’ who were pushed into new territories. The darkest and hairiest indicate old habitats, the blonds/redheads and greys extremes of the expansion, I wonder?

  177. Anonymous[163] • Disclaimer says:
    @jbwilson24

    Blending in with whites, running businesses, amassing wealth, and voting left… sounds Jewish but of course that is only despicable when Jews do it, not those Mongoloids who are k-selected in the same spirit as us white Europeans according to goofy altright bloggers. East Asians don’t fight or care for white underrepresentation in Ivy’s and are only concerned about helping each other and raising their share of the pie. If they achieved 40% of the spots in elite universities as they are demanding would you not consider that “locking out” others, namely European Americans who deserve them? They are not compatible with us.

    • Replies: @Franklin Ryckaert
  178. @Rex Little

    Yes, due to centuries of consistent endogamy the various local Jewish groups became homogenized and as such recognizable, but those various Jewish groups often differ much from each other, while most still carry some amount of genes from the original Jews from Palestine. In Israel the mixture of Ashkenazis, Sefardis, Mizrahis, Ethiopis and others will eventually result in a type that would more or less resemble the original Israelites, thus making them a better fit in the region.

  179. @Anonymous

    Multi-racial or multi-ethnic societies always become battlefields for the various groups. Contrary to the Orwellian slogan, “diversity” is never a strength.

  180. roonaldo says:
    @Curmudgeon

    Check out pleistocenecoalition.com. The Hueyatlaco site near Puebla, Mexico has lithic remains ranging from 80,000 to 430,000BP. There is much else of interest at that website. Other early sites include Pedra Furada in northeastern Brazil at 60,000BP and the Cerutti Mastodon Site outside San Diego at 130,000BP. Run afoul of the Church of Clovis First and the high priests and priestesses of U.S. Anthropology will excommunicate you, as they did to the courageous Virginia Steen-McIntyre. In Turkey, the Gobekli Tepe site, at 10,000BC, is frying some establishment cortexes.

  181. dcite says:
    @Iris

    I’ve looked at hundreds of ancient Egyptian portraits. The paintings are ambiguous. The 3-D ones (carvings in stone for example) are a mixed bag. There are those who obviously have sub-Saharan African looks, but most do not. I could cherry pick some very white looking examples, as you have the black looking ones. But really they look like — Egyptians. They don’t look like anybody else really, but they lean more towards a typical middle-eastern sort of Caucasoid type.. In fact, they look much like they do now. If you go to Egypt you will see. The northern part of the country has persons very white looking by north African standards, while the southern part has more black African looks. Just what you’d expect. And Egyptians did differentiate between the black Nubians and themselves by color, as they differentiated between themselves and the light Hittites, by color among other traits.

    • Replies: @Iris
  182. “Evolution is a fact. The Theory of Evolution by Natural Selection is our best explanation for the fact of evolution. This “Theory” would never become a “fact” or “law” because that’s not how science works.”

    Ohhh brother,

    A fact is something that can be verified and most importantly — replicated and predicted.

    So you are welcome to provide the evidence of any existence of live beings in which some transitional species via the evolutionary process is available. What you are confusing is is what is meant a consesus about what constitutes truth. In this minus the evidence of evolution a large number of scientists, accept evolution as truth. That is not the same thing as scientific fact. And that is evolution is a theory, there is no predictable scenarios about a new species developed from an existing one now.

    What exists are blank spaces — and those spaces are filled with conjecture. In this case the conjecture is that biodiversity is the result of evolution. There are a lot of problems the notion not the least of which is a lack of evidence for a transitional animal anywhere that indicates a transitionary development.

    I place a lot of weight on the endgame of a scientific fact — it’s process that upon a set formula — one can predict the end or the next step.

    Pray do tell, what will be the next or new genetic leap from man to —- what’s next.

    Now we are not talking about an adaptation, but a new species –
    ———————————————————-

    There’s what’s popular

    There’s what’s accepted

    There’s what can be proved — (and prediction and replication are key factors) It’s a fact that given a set of knowns — the sun will rise tommorrow.

    Based on what the knowns are predict what new species will be derived from humans — and describe the transition or the leap to said new species.

    Have at it.

  183. “Evolution is a fact. The Theory of Evolution by Natural Selection is our best explanation for the fact of evolution.”

    Now if i were you I would spend some time quantifying — the criterea of “best”, best based on what is the issue and furthermore “best” based not on proven but some manner of plausibility. Here’s a more accurate understanding of theory . . .

    “Thus, it is evident that theories are imaginative constructions of the human mind—the results of philosophical and aesthetic judgments as well as of observation—for they are only suggested by observational information rather than inductively generalized from it. ”

    https://www.britannica.com/science/scientific-theory

  184. roonaldo says:
    @EliteCommInc.

    The theory that accumulations of random mutations produces more highly organized cells, tissues, organs, etc., as well as producing, from species, the greater diversity of genuses, families, orders, and so on, was until recently untestable, and taken on faith by neo-Darwinism. Now it can and has been tested at the molecular level and has been found wanting–random mutations cannot produce the mind-bogglingly complex molecular machinery of the cell–in other words, the aforementioned theory has been refuted, or falsified, if you will. What random mutations can do is fit a species more tightly into its immediate environs at the expense of general adaptability as they take a wrecking ball to the genome. Don’t take my word for it, read biochemist Michael Behe’s latest work “Darwin Devolves.” His previous book, “The Edge of Evolution,” is also excellent. His 1996 book, “Darwin’s Black Box,” which I haven’t read, apparently sent the Darwinists ahowling, and I suppose they are in full frothing-at-the-mouth mode now–because once the aforementioned theory is refuted, what remains, by process of elimination, is an intelligence at work.

  185. Eagle Eye says:
    @Chinaman

    There is nothing more dangerous than western political ideology in the world of ideas. It have killed more Chinese than any guns and opium that White people have used on us.

    Correct. It was on the banks of the Seine and in the Latin Quarter of Paris that Pol Pot – probably already a sociopath – evolved into a cunning, mass murdering zealot.

  186. “The theory that accumulations of random mutations produces more highly organized cells, tissues, organs, etc., as well as producing, from species, the greater diversity of genuses, families, orders, and so on, was until recently untestable, and taken on faith by neo-Darwinism.”

    That’s not evolution. Nor does it fit either transitional species, not species jump.

    Sounds interesting . . . make what predictions you will and well see of said species becomes some other species.

    • Replies: @EliteCommInc.
  187. Iris says:
    @dcite

    Many thanks for the elaborate reply.

    The Black African origin of Ancient Egypt’s civilisation was first established by Senegalese scientist Cheikh Anta Diop in 1954. He did not base his demonstration only on the colour of their skin, as they represented themselves, but also on a large array of evidence stretching to many domains: linguistic, sociological, religious.

    His works led to the Unesco organising the Cairo Congress on the Origins of Ancient Egypt, a gathering that the foremost history specialists attended and got their conventional thesis blown to smithereens by Diop.

    Diop has produced a rich body of works; the problem is that none of his detractors has been able to produce refutations of the same quality.

    To clarify, t “Black Origin” means that the original, first Pharaonic dynasties started in Southern Egypt (Lower Nubia) where there was not, and still there is not, any indigenous “Whites /Caucasoid” population.

    The successive Egyptian human settlements came in the following sequential order, moving South, from Lower Nubia, to North, towards the Mediterranean:
    – Nabta Playa circa 10,000 BC
    – Abou Simbel circa 7,000 BC
    – Thebes (Louxor) circa 3,200 BC

    Ancient Egyptians, of course, merged with their whiter neighbours as they moved North, but they were the ones bringing civilisation along to places where there was none.

    As per the different shades of brown they used to represent themselves, well, we can’t understand it because we are not Black. On the contrary, Native Black Africans do differentiate between the different ethnic groups based on face features and nuance of skin colour, and represented themselves accordingly.
    People from today’s Northern Sudan look different, both in features and skin tone, from those in Southern Sudan. The former are probably the closest cousins to the original Egyptians.

  188. @EliteCommInc.

    correction: Sounds interesting . . . make what predictions you will and we’ll see if said species becomes some other species.

    It sounds like we are on the same page . . . about the veracity of Darwin as fact

  189. fnn says:

    To be fair, at least one (there are likely more) non-violent black tribe/ethnic group has been found. I don’t think Devlin, or any those he cites, would be surprised by this:
    https://www.nature.com/articles/news041206-6

    Among the Jula (Dioula) people of Burkina Faso, the most peaceful tribe studied, where the murder rate is 1 in 100,000 annually, left-handers make up 3.4% of the population. But in the Yanomami tribe of Venezuela, where more than 5 in 1,000 meet a violent end each year, southpaws account for 22.6%. Faurie and Raymond report their findings in the_ Proceedings of the Royal Society_.

  190. tracker says:

    For a scientifically untrained eye, the article would seem plausible enough. The Achille’s heel of its argument is, however, not so much in its reasoning as much as in its premises, which are based on data. So, let’s talk about data, shall we? In particular, the IQ data. In this article, and for that matter all other similar ones I could find on this site, the data is taken for granted and deemed rock solid. But when you dig a little deeper you realize it is of quite poor quality. IQ data has not been colected in a systematic manner.

    What we have here are mostly calculations from PISA tests, which may have some correlation with IQ, for countries with comparable schooling systems, but are obviously not adequate for any serious and sweeping conclusions of the kind presented in the essay. We can have the best reasoning skills in the world but with junk data it is foolish at best and also quite scientifically dishonest not to aknowledge this at the start as a caveat at least.

    Until we get a proper, scientifically gathered, IQ test data for the whole world, let’s not fool ourselves with premature judgements.

    On the other hand, I do aplaude the effort of talking about the race. A dialogue is absolutely necessary and sweeping the topic under the carpet in a hysterical PC campain will bring us no solutions or the way forward.

    It’s essentially a classic data science problem we are trying to solve here.

    • Replies: @JoannF
  191. Iris says:
    @Theodore

    The article you posted is defeating the point you are trying to make.

    The Egyptian Civilisation started around 10,000 BC in Nabta Playa, a Southern location in the Nubian desert. See map posted in comment 192.

    The samples analysed in the article cover the last period of the Egyptian Kingdoms and Roman Period (1388 BCE–426CE), and have all been taken in one, single location, the Abusir el-Meleq community, closer to the Nile delta and the Mediterranean.

    That would be the same as taking DNA samples from the burial vault of the current British Royal family and draw conclusions as per who inhabited Scotland’s Highlands 8000 years ago. Almost entirely irrelevant.

    • Replies: @Theodore
    , @Ilyana_Rozumova
  192. @Commentator Mike

    I criticized Paul Kersey on his threads. do you know what he does with my posts: puts them in limbo..leaves them awaiting moderation forever..a unique form of censorship.

    you see commentator the situation that began with the slave ships is still in place just evolved to new ways of social control. you behave as if we have a new world and we do not. you talk about the insecurity of whites…interesting?

    Look at Kerseys headlines..always in attack on black people..never accurately reflective of the situation. there is nothng in what you descibe of white people in the sitiuation that white people did to . visit on Black people for centuries in far far far far worse measure than anythigh ridiculous Kersey tries to impose on Black people wihit his repotage of what you call truth

    have you ever looked at the routine life of Black people in the ‘New World and in the areas of africa where the white man chose to live.. and additionaly where he operated to steal people and land for whatever purpose he set up..the killing, raping, slavery, incarceration and torture?

    I dont know what the hell you guys are going on with. you do not reprsent the world as it is…you presnt a picture of the world that is not real and that is where you start from..Devlin, Kersey, Derbyshire. and Kersey by attitude, argument relentless negative focus on races clearly has no positive outcome in mind, is not working for one but for the negative. aand you too when you start from where you do.

    there must be social change to to equalize material life for all, to bring about positive social relations on all levels of life, between all the people, everywhere. there is no possibility of positive social outcome in what we call capitalism. and what Kersey is doing by his relentless inacciurate deleterious focus on the negative in race relations using Black people as his focuss, is creating a basis for the genocide of Black people globally..right in front of our faces on the Unz Review

    Kersey is doing that deliberately and Ron Unz is facilitating him by allowing him all the space he needs to put out that relenless diatribe against Black people endlessly. and Kersey censors his threads by refusing to put up any critical comments of his nonsense..from me for sure. and Ron Unz lets Kersey get away with that too

  193. Juzi says:
    @Franklin Ryckaert

    Funnily enough ancient Egyptians were discovered to be closer to East Asians than to so called Whites.

    https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms15694

    Sub saharan genomes only accumulated in recent history.

    So if anything, multiple civilisations have been created by East Asians than those that live in region in modern times.

    • Replies: @Theodore
  194. Juzi says:
    @Bookish1

    All talk no proof simply indicates an alternative reality

  195. @ben sampson

    I mean I know the social life..the almost routine harassment of my bigger brothers by the cops, endless arrests for no reasons..walking home after work at night. spend th nigh in jail let g th next day and repeated..loss of jobs for always being under police scrutiny..guys who came up strict under my terrible father…guys who were never intentionally trouble period

    that is not the way they were. then when I grew up it was my turn. I stopped driving because of the cops. and the behavior of th cops..th utter nasty things they would say to you, what they called us..tickets for no reason I could not afford to pay and no god dam magistrate every believed a word I said in my defense about police entrapment and their utterly reprehnsible behavior.

    I used to be careful not to incite police violence under any circumstanc because I did not want my head busted open with a baton..or worse shot to death on the streets. and even when I stopped driving police harassment did not stop as with my brothers as well. dont work late and walk home on the city streets. you will be pulled over any god dam way

    where was the routine safety for Black people? where is it right now?

    and what I talk about is ‘good’ relative to the ghetto! we did not live in the ghetto. we had a half decent home and house and that may have limited the police violence towards us. but they harrassed the shit out of us. they shot up and beat up and killed in the ghetto but not us. and we knew how to keep still so we would not precipate anything that would lead to us getting shot

    I read Kersey..and now commentator Mike here… and the world I knew and know is not where they start from. they apparently do not know that world existed, are not aware that the same ,supposed lack of routine existenial physical security they claim white people do nto have due to violent Black behavior..is not true..and to the extent that it is true is relative to Black people not to white..that for centuries in Africa and in the new world Black people were terrorizeed by whites. what Kerseys describes fo Black people is what hppens to Blacks. and it was far far far worse for us that what he descirbe anyway

    Kersey is an agent of social provocation. Kersey is trying to set up the society for some racial nastiness as soon as he can achieve it by what is clearly fabrication of a picture that does not exist..and to the extent that it does is creation of the state in its on-going impostion of social control on all ordinary people. that is what Kersey is about..cvarrying out an aspect of elitist social division and misdirection of ordianry people, leading them to hate each other never being able to develop the solidarity necesary to defeat minority eltist social control and rip off of the laboor and wealth of the people

    this is what the Unz Review supports by coddling Kersey and others in his bosom..his blog. Unz should criticize them effecively..he can do that easily.. he is a brilliant man. a proper critique would establish the basis to kick them off his blog..or bring thm to heel: report accurate, develop a broad approach to their subject matter that expands knowledge, that seeks and leads to resolution..not incitment of hate and division among the ethnic groups of the human species in these regions..and where-ever else. do that or go write elsewhere should be Unz’s ultimatum, based on a proper critique of those absolutely negatively intentioned recalcitrants

  196. Ramses says: • Website

    Well, Blacks outperform whites in UK schools. So, the European IQ fallacy goes out the window. Every high culture, meaning those with big building projects, high fashion, science, etc. derive from Blacks. Before the Greeks, there were the Minoans, Black folk. Before the Romans, there were the Etruscans, Black folk. Of course Egypt, and the entire Middle East was northeast Africa, in the ancient mind. Look at the primary source findings, not the modern artist depictions. Whites are too preoccupied with race. Let’s move forward on this lovely blue planet and meet the others among the stars.

    • Replies: @Anon
    , @Wizard of Oz
  197. @ben sampson

    Ben,

    I know well the history … and the present if you say so – according to the multiculturalists, race relations are supposed to be at an all time high, but then I guess not.

    I did occasionally look at comment sections of some black sites and the anti-white hatred is just as nasty, or worse, than the reverse here. Some of the commenters there even get nasty with other blacks for being friendly with whites. OK, they have their point of view and their arguments about it all, and I can’t say I don’t sympathise with them. But it’s really just a mirror image of the white nationalist sites.

    there must be social change to to equalize material life for all, to bring about positive social relations on all levels of life, between all the people, everywhere. there is no possibility of positive social outcome in what we call capitalism.

    OK, but how many people, of whatever race, have you got on board about this? Most people of whatever race are just too busy trying to scrape through or with their stupid entertainment to even think about things like this. And in the meantime what? We all have to look out for our own safety and security and minimise risks to our own selves, even just to live our own lives, let alone waiting for some change that may never come. So many of us here come up with so many ideas, whether you or I like them or not is irrelevant, and nothing will come out of most of them. That’s the reality. I only stood up to defend Kersey because his reports don’t bother me, or I should say they do because most of the victims are white.

  198. @ben sampson

    I could be mistaken, But I do think that CNN has a comment section.

    • Replies: @ben sampson
  199. @Just passing through

    But they would be wrong wouldn’t they? Or are you too lazy to work out why it is pretty obvious why what we regard as pretty important for creating the blessings of the early 21st century are predominantly the product of a particular part of Western Civilisation – not yet but likely by 2070 – overtaken by Chinese, Indians, Japanese and Koreans.

  200. @Eg

    He wasn’t making a statement. He was putting you on a spot and your prissy purse lipped response showed that you didn’t like it. Actually you should have been able to name a few Japanese products.

  201. Anon[506] • Disclaimer says:
    @Ramses

    I have just been told that my third comment on UR today, pointing to the rubbish in the all bold comment by Ramses, was in excess of the allowable number. I sought to post it as Anon. So what are the rules or is it special for me?

    Wizard of Oz

  202. @Ramses

    Blacks are very far from outperforming whites in UK schools despite UK whites’ 100-150 years dysgenuc breeding. Only a few Africans do – mostly Igbo…

    As to your “black” Minoans and Etruscans you completely iverlook the evolutionary possibilities of about 55,000 years of coping with the Eurasian climate since the African emigration of homo sapiens began. Not many Eurasians got the full fair skin and blue eyes. Indeed most of them obviously didn’t.

  203. What I intended to add to Comment 206 was that your rules, whatever they are precisely, make it difficult for your threads to host civil, or other worthwhile, conversations. Thus one counters two items of misleading BS with referenced contradiction and one can’t even say, a minute later “Interesting argument: what’s a reliable source for the Bullitt quote?”.

  204. @Ilyana_Rozumova

    finally! I thought you guys wanted to save the world?
    come’on! its not so hard

    seems however, you’all prefer to wallow in the mess. be my guest

    • Agree: Ilyana_Rozumova
    • Replies: @Commentator Mike
  205. anonymous[179] • Disclaimer says:
    @obwandiyag

    “Except for the fact that little Nigerian girls are smarter than you.” What? Nonsense.
    Do please post the link.

  206. @ben sampson

    The header of UR says what it’s about, reporting what’s excluded from the MSM. I wish there was something more positive and pro-active that could come out of this venture but I doubt it. I think for that you have to engage IRL in your local community, as do others here who wish to implement their ideas into practice.

  207. anarchyst says:
    @ben sampson

    I agree with you wholeheartedly as to the evils of our so-called “law enforcement” system. Drastic changes ARE needed.

    Blacks ARE not only disproportionately “singled out” for much harsher treatment from today’s “law enforcement” system, but are perceived as being systematically defined as ALL being criminals. Even black police officers treat whites and other non-blacks with more cordiality than they treat their fellow blacks.

    That being said, the number of unjustified murders of whites by police officers is still greater for whites. Although unjustified murders of blacks by police officers are not as prevalent, the cases that are stated quite often occur because of arguments and “differences of opinion” directed against police officers. Many cases are not good examples of police brutality, although they do serve to publicize the dirty, criminal actions of today’s American “law enforcement”.

    White people have learned a long time ago to “keep your mouth shut, be deferential to police officers, even if they are wrong, and terminate the traffic stop interaction as quickly as possible”. It would behoove blacks to adopt these same tactics.

    Part of the problem is the way blacks and whites view “law enforcement”. Blacks view “law enforcement” as occupiers and enforcers while whites tend to view “law enforcement as “protectors”-the opposite ends of the spectrum.

    It would behoove both blacks and whites to provide a united front against the system we call “law enforcement” in order to effect much-needed changes.

    In the “good old days”, police officers were seen as “peace officers”,whose job was to “maintain the peace”. ”

    Escalation of force” was the doctrine–using only enough force to resolve the situation.
    In the “good old days”, any police officer who drew his firearm had better have had a good reason for doing so. A person wielding a stick or a rake was not seen as justification for using “deadly force”, unlike today’s doctrine where “I feahed fo mah life” is enough to absolve a police officer of a murder charge.

    The “escalation of force” doctrine has been “thrown out the window” being replaced by israeli military tactics, demanding instant compliance to orders, even if conflicting orders are given by multiple police officers. “We are all Palestinians, now”.

    One only has to look at the high-profile case of Daniel Shaver, who was murdered by Mesa, Arizona police officer Philip Brailsford. Attempting to crawl with one’s hands behind one’s back is physically impossible, but Shaver was ordered to do so. In fact, Brailsford had intent to murder someone by the simple fact that he had the words “You’re f#cked” engraved on the dust cover of his AR-15. Any other non-police officer in such a situation would have been convicted merely on intent, but not police officers. You see, even though Brailsford got away with murder, he was still protected by his department being allowed to retire with a pension.

    The state of American “law enforcement” has been on a downhill slide for a long time, with almost every case of a questionable shooting by police being resolved in the favor of “law enforcement”, despite irrefutable video and audio evidence being available.

    In my humble opinion, the “black lives matter” movement IS “the canary in the coal mine” when it comes to police practices

  208. “In my humble opinion, the “black lives matter” movement IS “the canary in the coal mine” when it comes to police practices.”

    Uhhh no, the BLM is a distorted form of some globalized fantasy that encompasses a mass of issues wholly irrelevant to their stated agenda and worse, undermines the same.

    The canary if one wants to call it that were the indictments concerning practices engaged since the end of slavery regarding police tactics supported by the community. And now that even believers find themselves targets of government, their is a slow realization that the canary they said was crazy, and unhinged was accurately foretelling the future. That when we lay claim to law and order its a 360 process, in which the greatest burden is on government instead of the population.

    Maybe the canary wasn’t imagining poisonous gas after all. But BLM is no canary.

    Their goal and their mechanism is probably long term detrimental to the people they claim to aide. And that includes over stating the case against the police. While ignoring the policy that help create and support the issues of complaint, including city councils, police unions, etc.

    • Replies: @anarchyst
  209. JoannF says:
    @anarchyst

    I would agree a lot, theorize about the compassion level of the Neanderthals – and if that was what killed them – and remind of the contempt with which Maurice Samuels mentioned that western societies were “consensus-based”

    Then I would add – to Christianity, which after all has some semitic roots – Oikophobia and the general Mouse Utopia effect, as humans are herd animals of, on the whole, rather limited intelligence, whose societies cycle through repetitive stages, over and over, while they assure each other how much in control they are – please google Oikophobia and Mouse Utopia, well worth it in case you’re not yet familiar

  210. anarchyst says:
    @EliteCommInc.

    You need to improve your reading comprehension…

    My statement: “Many cases are not good examples of police brutality, although they do serve to publicize the dirty, criminal actions of today’s American “law enforcement”.”

    My statement discounts much of the “black lives matter” movement as being somewhat counterproductive as in many of the cases, the shootings by police was justified.

    When rogue police officers are acquitted upon trial or “no billed” by “rubber stamp grand juries” and nothing is done to stop abuses by police, the people DO have the right to protest.

    When multi-million-dollar settlements are awarded to those who have suffered abuse at the hands of our “law enforcement” THAT tells you something.

    A better way would be to abolish official “immunity” for all public officials and require them to purchase a “bond” from an insurance company. You can bet that insurance companies would be more diligent in “weeding out” the “bad apples” than our present “protection racket” system.

    Any awards for police misconduct should be disbursed from police pension funds, not from the taxpayers. You would see things get “cleaned up” in a hurry…

  211. Anon[930] • Disclaimer says:
    @anon

    Dude, you might take about two seconds to go search someone’s comment archive to find out who “his people” are before you make a complete fool of yourself.

    Anyway, happy new year.

  212. Theodore says:
    @Iris

    The article you posted is defeating the point you are trying to make.

    No it doesn’t, show exactly how

    The Egyptian Civilisation started around 10,000 BC in Nabta Playa, a Southern location in the Nubian desert

    So you’re talking about a complete population replacement then, and then a slight reversal of it?

    There’s really no actual evidence for ancient or even predynastic Egyptians being Negroid

  213. Hmmmm . . . I think I comprehended quite clearly.

    I responded to the below reference.

    “In my humble opinion, the “black lives matter” movement IS “the canary in the coal mine” when it comes to police practices.”

    I simply point out that they are not the “canary” in my view. As your comments point out the system protects itself from criticism and penalty and as such does irreparable harm. You don’t get any argument from me. My position is that the warning signs of just how destructive the system would become were far sooner. But the country was more than willing to allow blacks and other outgroups to bare the brunt.

    I am sure I comprehended you quite clearly. Your further exposition has very little if any impact on the canary metaphor. And though well put . . . the organization and time are is my disagreement.

  214. Theodore says:
    @Juzi

    Funnily enough ancient Egyptians were discovered to be closer to East Asians than to so called Whites.

    https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms15694

    That’s not what it says at all. “Near Easterners” are not “East Asians” they are “West Asians” and far more genetically similar to Whites than they are to East Asians.

  215. Bliss says:
    @Franklin Ryckaert

    And to what race did those Egyptian Africans belong? Well, not to the “Sun People” of sub-Sahara Africa. They were Caucasoids, coming originally from the Middle East.

    You ignorant fool. Egyptian civilization arose in the deep south far from the Mediterranean and far from west Asia. No one who saw the ancient Egyptians (like the Greeks who wrote about them) ever compared them to arabs or levantines or persians, fuggedabout Europeans. The comparison was always to the people to their south (modern day Sudan) who the Greeks called Ethiopians. They wrote that the Egyptians and Ethiopians were very similar to each other, and very different from their neighbors outside Africa (east of what is now the Suez Canal).

    Secondly, you clueless idiot, the 3 earliest civilizations Sumer, Egypt and Indus Valley were all located in the very hot climate zone thousands of miles from the frigid swampy forests which spawned your Nordic race. The ancient Sumerians, Egyptians and Indians were most certainly not Ice People. Only a complete retard would claim they were.

    Civilization was invented by non-whites, by black and brown Sun People. You all are riding on their coattails. Europeans invented nothing: not the wheel, not agriculture, not writing, not math, nothing at all until they were finally civilized, a couple thousand years later for Southern Europeans and over three thousand years later for the Northern European barbarians.

  216. JoannF says:
    @tracker

    You do understand that the PISA tests started in 2000 (the year), whiIe IQ data have been researched since many decades before that, and have nothing to do with PISA – even ‘The BeII Curve’ was pubIished in the 1990s, before the Age of Reason and the Great IntersectionaI FIood ? Just saying

  217. Bliss says:
    @anarchyst

    In fact, it is JEWS who perfected cruel, perverted torture techniques from antiquity through the middle ages to bolshevism and communism.

    In fact? Lol. Show us where you learned this “fact”.

    What we know for a fact is that Europeans are the most sadistic torturers of all. Look at all the creative instruments of torture found in the ubiquitous torture chambers of every medieval castle in Christendom.

    Look at the vicious beating meted out to Jesus by the Roman soldiers before he was nailed to the cross (a cruel and very common method of execution designed to humiliate and to prolong suffering).

    Look at how the Romans fed Christians to the lions in the Colosseum in front of thousands of cheering spectators. And that was just one of the many varieties of tortures that were presented for the sick pleasure of the citizens of Rome.

    Today tens of millions of Europeans and their vast diaspora in the Americas and Oceania flock to the Dark Web to get off on snuff videos, torture and rape videos etc. Including the torture, rape and murder of little children in the Philippines. Pure evil.

    When it comes to cruelty, vulgarity, debauchery, sexual perversions (sadism, masochism, strangulation, pedophilia, child porn, orgies etc) Europeans are by far the worst. Maybe the Japanese are their peers in the cruelty and sexual perversion departments.

    • Replies: @Commentator Mike
    , @Nalca
  218. Anon[810] • Disclaimer says:
    @Just passing through

    In The United States 4% of white women have been having Black offspring for decades now , and the number of white women mating with mixed-raced Hispanics is now close to 5%.

    This is one reason why whites are already a minority among the US population under the age of 15. Another reason is the lower birth rate of whites , but a significant cause is due to whites mating with non-whites.

    If this trend continues Whites will be less than 30% of the US population in 50 years. This process also occurred with whites in Latin America. 200 years ago whites were 50% of the population of Mexico , today just 10% of Mexicans are white.

    Brazil is another example. In 1900 the white population of Brazil was 80%. Today the white population of Brazil is under 30%.

    • Replies: @Jeff Stryker
  219. anarchyst says:

    Your statement: “Today tens of millions of Europeans and their vast diaspora in the Americas and Oceania flock to the Dark Web to get off on snuff videos, torture and rape videos etc. Including the torture, rape and murder of little children in the Philippines. Pure evil.”

    Where do you get your information from??

    • Replies: @Jeff Stryker
  220. @Anon

    The difference is that Latin America never pretended to be egalitarian and never had a white middle-class like the US of yeoman European emigres.

    So it is all well and good for European elites in Latin America to fly in helicopters from their fortified haciendas to the office, but in America middle-class whites are going to be raw meat in the favela of the future.

    Whites in Latin America long ago struck deals with Washington in order to maintain dictatorships as well as to allow the excess Indians, Mestizos to flood the US labor market so that they did not get Bolshy and revolt.

    • Replies: @AaronB
  221. @anarchyst

    When a white man completely goes off the rails like a Ted Bundy serial killer or Tony Soprano type mobster who has a high IQ and enough muscle mass to be a match for the average Blood or Crip and no conscience the effect on society is disastrous.

    Whereas your average Blood or Crip is so low IQ that by the time he is 22 he is already in prison, your average white mobster orders/commits dozens of murders before he is arrested in middle age-Whitey Bulger is thought to have killed over 200 people. John Gotti at least 35.

    Of course white criminals like this are a disaster for society. We’ve all seen the Sopranos. They have a relatively high IQ (Bulger’s was very high) and a gifted Jewish lawyer on speed dial and 100 “buttons” in the street.

    But there is a difference. Most of the time, they only kill other mobsters. Can anyone really feel that bad when some Tony Soprano kills a Ralphie Cifretto? Granted, Whitey Bulger killed an innocent man who was hanging around with gangsters but as his hitman Keven Weeks himself said “You want to hang around wiseguys, that’s what happens”. Tony Soprano is not “tagging” his turf and assaulting white passerbys outside his McMansion in North Jersey.

    Your pubic school does not immediately go downhill because of Meadow Soprano. Again, there are exceptions and John Gotti killed the man who accidentally hit his son on a bicycle.

    Thankfully, it is rare when this happens.

  222. @Iris

    I am so sorry but You are so incorrect. It was established that Khufu pyramid was built 10 thousand years ago. So Egyptian civilization must have started at least 15 thousand years ago. Although I am not contesting your indication where Egyptian civilization started. Just opposite. It supports my theory.
    I am presuming that now we are at the top of the hot age.
    Interval is About 40 thousand years.
    So 20 thousand years ago was peak of the ice Age.
    And than 30 thousand years ago is the beginning of Ice age.

    We see all kind of pictures people hunting mammoths.
    Well maybe.

    But I am more convinced that not all people did stay up north.
    Actually I am convinced that most people, were moving south from Europe and Asia.
    Opposite was happening in Southern hemisphere.

    It is undeniable that people were moving to warmer climates. Toward equator,
    So actually and most probably there was no change of black skin to white.
    The change was the white skin to black.
    So all those who have black skin were once whites.

    And about 15 to 10 thousand years ago as planet was warming up people started to move up.
    Babylon.

    • Replies: @Iris
  223. @Bliss

    How strange then that those ancient Egyptians never depicted themselves as Negroids, but always as Caucasoids, similar to West Asians.

    Here is such a picture from the ancient Egyptians :

    And here is a picture of a typical West Asian Caucasoid, a woman from Saudi Arabia, who looks strikingly similar to that ancient Egyptian picture :

    See what I mean? Both fully Caucasoid with no Negroid admixture whatsoever.

    As for the ancient Sumerians, they too were Caucasoids, some even with blue eyes. Here is how they depicted themselves :

    The ancient Egyptians too sometimes depicted themselves with blue eyes :

    Blue eyes still occur among Arabs :

    https://qph.fs.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-b5a511fcbf171505c337cd2190102345

    It is these Caucasoids who founded the oldest civilizations in Mesopotamia and Egypt, not those “Sun People” Negroids.

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
  224. @Bliss

    Sounds like you’re advancing good reasons to segregate the races so whites can just torture their own and the rest can get on with advancing their civilisations and building walls and fences to protect themselves from these barbarians.

  225. @Bliss

    Have you forgotten when the main out of Africa migrations of Homo Sapiens occurred? About 60,000 years ago in case you have forgotten. Plenty of time for those Middle Easterners to have evolved lighter skins than black Africans (and less cold exposed features) and to have moved south as the Ice Ages may have nudged them. BTW how many Egyptian tombs and funeral artefacts show skin colour or features resembling those of sub Saharan Africans, or even Nilotics?

    Have you by chance actually read a book or two you would like to tell us about as well as uttering denunciations?

  226. Iris says:
    @Ilyana_Rozumova

    Hello Ilyana; I think that the commonly agreed date for the construction of the Great Pyramid of Giza (Khufu’s) is 2500 BC.

    The archaeological site of Nabta Playa goes back 10, 000 years, as it was dated approximately 7500BC. Osteological data proves that it was established by Sub-Saharan people, likely from the Nubian Desert (Sudan).

    Nabta Playa is located only 100km West of Abu Simbel, where Egyptian civilisation took off around 5000BC. By archaeological logics, Black people from the various settlements around Nabta Playa created the Egyptian civilisation in Abu Simbel.

    By HBD losers’ logics, a bunch of Caucasoids coming out of nowhere crossed thousands of miles into the harsh Egyptian desert, without known means of transport and food storage, and not knowing whether they were headed to a hospitable place, and then created Abu Simbel out of the blue.

    HBD thesis are a joke and an embarrassment. White European people’s contribution to human civilisation is outstanding and unparalleled. Whites don’t need to ridicule themselves by disparaging the obvious and undisputable achievements of other ethnic groups: Blacks, Asians.

    Wishing you a Happy New Year; kind regards.

  227. Nalca says:
    @Bliss

    Look at the vicious beating meted out to Jesus by the Roman soldiers before he was nailed to the cross (a cruel and very common method of execution designed to humiliate and to prolong suffering).

    Except it wasn’t the Romans who invented crucifixion, it was used by Persians, Carthaginians, and Macedonians among others when Rome was just a provincial city.
    Even Jewish kings crucified people.
    It’s only stopped thanks to Christians.

    Look at how the Romans fed Christians to the lions in the Colosseum in front of thousands of cheering spectators. And that was just one of the many varieties of tortures that were presented for the sick pleasure of the citizens of Rome.

    Because the way the Aztecs executed theirs prisoners was nicer maybe ?
    https://www.history.com/news/aztec-human-sacrifice-religion

    Or perhaps you prefer the Chinese way ? Death By A Thousand Cuts
    Look, there is even a Wikipedia article on it, with photography :
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lingchi

    Today tens of millions of Europeans and their vast diaspora in the Americas and Oceania flock to the Dark Web to get off on snuff videos, torture and rape videos etc. Including the torture, rape and murder of little children in the Philippines. Pure evil.

    Speaking of evil and torture :
    Witch burning : https://www.liveleak.com/view?i=cfd_1367882372
    Rape of 79y old women : https://www.diaridetarragona.com/tarragona/Detenido-un-hombre-por-intentar-violar-a-una-mujer-de-79-anos-mientras-dormia-20191217-0019.html
    Gang rape of 12y old : https://voiceofeurope.com/2019/12/uk-12-year-old-girl-passed-around-like-a-piece-of-meat-by-middle-eastern-rape-gang/

    When it comes to cruelty, vulgarity, debauchery, sexual perversions (sadism, masochism, strangulation, pedophilia, child porn, orgies etc) Europeans are by far the worst.

    And who allow this shit ? Who defend pedophilia and pornography as a right ?
    https://www.unz.com/ejones/pornography-and-political-control-the-hexenhammer-debate/

  228. @Iris

    more logical according to the facts and common sense..if not quite as complete and sharp as it might be, but more accurate and sane than a whole lot in here

  229. @Iris

    Well?
    I do not know how reliable , and PRECISE the carbon dating is. But I do have a certain doubt about it.
    The theory that original people on this earth were Black and that they moved from Africa to the far corners of earth is not correct. And it cannot be correct.This theory is based only on finding one skeleton in Africa dated it eight thousand years and named it Lucy.
    …………………………………………………………..
    Only my theory is correct, Heart of my theory is that climate on this earth is cyclical. It changes from hot age to ice age and back again. I established the cycle of change to be 40 thousand years.
    I came to this conclusion by my own logic.
    …………………………………………………………….
    Interestingly enough I did go on some Astronomical site where some person did claim the same thing as me.
    He (or she) did claim the cycle of 42 yeas.
    I do admit that I should have recorded the site name and the name of the person, but I did not know that the subject of white and black migration would arise.
    …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
    The most important fact that I want to emphasis is that the reason for migration was change
    of Earth climate periodically every 4o years and that it was not benevolent. And the migration was not and absolutely not one directional it was two directional induced by warming of earth or cooling of earth.
    …………………………………………..
    Happy new year to you my dear. (My pleasure.)

    • Replies: @Iris
  230. AaronB says:
    @Jeff Stryker

    I think “toughness” is as much a response to circumstances as it is anything innate.

    If you have a soft and prosperous upbringing, you will probably turn out pretty soft. But if you grew up in a tough environment, its surprising how tough people you thought were weak can become.

    Look at how skinny European Jews went to Israel and became physically tougher than locals who had been farming and doing physical labor for centuries. And the short and skinny Japanese, who are maybe the least impressive people in Asia physically (the Koreans and northern Chinese tend to be tall and robust), were the fiercest warriors in Asia as long as anyone can remember. The Chinese used to call the Japanese the “dwarf people”.

    And the Japanese weren’t just more organized and better at using technology, they were physically tougher. For hundreds of years Japanese fighters were elite bodyguards to various South East Asian rulers, and had a reputation for being unstoppable pirates on the Chinese coasts.

    You live in Thailand, so you probably know how small, skinny unimpressive Thai guys often get the better of larger and more muscular whites in fights – true, it’s usually because the Thais attack in packs, often from behind and when its unexpected, and generally using weapons (bottles, chairs, etc).

    But still, it’s a fact that most of these whites had soft, safe upbringing so never became tough, so however physically unimpressive Thais may be, for the time being larger, stronger whites are at a disadvantage.

    If the US ever become a the way you describe, low class whites will simply toughen up and become organized, out of necessity. They will more than hold their own, I imagine.

    Also, the way you remember things in America is very outdated. Blacks and Hispanics have gone through their own softening up process. I don’t know if its the availability of porn and entertainment in general, and the dramatic lowering of consumer prices for everything which makes all sorts of toys affordable to even the poorest people, but the fearsome blacks and Hispanics you remember from your youth – as do I – no longer exist on the large numbers they once did.

    The kinds of nightmares you describe are today remote and isolated occurences. Your choice to live in Asia is still perfectly valid – in many ways it’s a better choice for poor whites, money goes much further, life can be easier, and they are very vibrant and fun places. I often feel nostalgic for my old Asia days.

    But America has changed a tremendous amount in the past 20 or 30 years since you’ve been here. It’s actually a pretty decent place these days on the ground level, and the main problems are the culture wars and the huge inequality, for the most part, not the existential crises you experienced as a youth.

  231. Iris says:
    @Ilyana_Rozumova

    .This theory is based only on finding one skeleton in Africa dated it eight thousand years and named it Lucy.

    Hello Ilyana; You are correct. The “East Side” anthropological thesis, based on the discovery of the first Hominid known to us at the time, has been proved wrong by more recent discoveries.

    3,2 million-year old Lucy’s skeleton was discovered by French Professor Yves Coppens on the East Side of a tectonic line of fracture called the Rift Valley that appeared 10 million years ago. Coppens then made the hypothesis that the apes living East of the Rift were obliged to evolve, and in particular to stand on two limbs, after the change in climate made the tropical forest disappear.

    This theory of apes evolving into Australopithecus, in a process triggered by the change in climate, was proved wrong when in the early 21st Century, 7-million years old hominid skeletons were recovered in Chad, 2000 km West of the Rift Valley.

    These Australopithecus are obviously quite far apart from the Homo Sapiens whom, we believe, we descend from, as Homo Sapiens would have appeared only 300,000 years ago. With kind regard.

  232. denk says:

    updates for the latest “exploits of Chicom agents in the [[[five liars]]] landscape….”

    we already heard this one,
    Fake Chinese police car in Oz to intimidate Uighurs ..[sic]

    It gets better…

    Apparently ,
    CCP spooks broke into the house of Anne
    Marie Brady, a reknowned China baiter in NZ, got away with her laptop.
    [sic]2

    But you aint seen nuthin yet,

    OMFGawd !
    A fucking wet job in Oz no less !
    As the story goes, Chinese spooks bumped off a would be asset , prolly to silence him off. !

    Big fucking [sic]3

    UNlike the CIA/MI6 , Chinese intel have been so low key and secretive , I doubt anybody know the name of that outfit.
    [[psst….. that so-called Chinese spy Wang Li Qiang, paraded on Aussie TV for a full sixty min interview, couldnt even tell the proper name of his unit either…..some super spy coming in from the cold indeed, heheheh]

    UNlike the CIA/MI6, Chinese intel has ZERO record
    of foreign capers.
    Now all of a sudden, We are told that these super duper Chinese agents are running amok in Oz, NZ,
    even perpetrating CIA/MI6 style wet job forchrissake !!!

    Is this a case of the hitherto defensive Chinese suddenly ‘getting more aggressive’, a favourite meme from the [[five head serpent]]] these days,
    or rather, that [[[five liars]]] are getting more audacious in their scripts ??

    To me this is a no brainer.

    But you never know with the [[[five liars]]],
    Fact is, there’r many right here who swallow every fukus agitprop on China, hook line and sinker.

    P.S.
    Is there a correlation between race and the propensity to lie ????

  233. Anon[185] • Disclaimer says:
    @ben sampson

    Slavery doesn’t make people stupid. It can make them ignorant and uneducated, but it doesn’t determine their basic IQ level. Some Greek and Roman slaves were actually pretty smart. The problem is that African slaves just were poor material and had innately low IQs. This is not fixable. The only thing that can cure stupidity is death.

    • Agree: Ilyana_Rozumova
    • Replies: @ben sampson
  234. Anon[404] • Disclaimer says:

    @denk
    you eat a lot lies about China, you shit a lot lies about China too. You are pathetic loser and China hater. Maybe you are personally related to China somehow which made you so possessed about China, I don’t care.
    Lying about China makes you feel so good about yourself and you can’t stop it.
    You see China as your enemy that must be defeated. That’s why you keep the lies and smears about China. Y

  235. Anon[404] • Disclaimer says:

    @denk
    you eat a lot lies about China, you shit a lot lies about China too. And you shit in public places with other watching.
    You are pathetic loser and China hater.
    Maybe you are personally related to China somehow which made you so possessed about China, I don’t care.
    Lying about China makes you feel so good about yourself and you can’t stop it.
    You see China as your enemy that must be defeated. That’s why you keep the lies and smears about China. You don’t mind whatever whenever whomever the topic is actually about, you come up with your lies and bad talks about China.
    You need to take some pills if you are not paid to do so.
    If you are young, maybe you can do some body building, and join the US army, wait for the war you long for toward China. So you can actually do something with your hate.
    Maybe you are too old and dying.
    Nagging and nagging with all the lies and shit you eat for so many years doesn’t help that much. It’s not like everyone is as stupid as you are and buy all the shit and lies.
    Your lies will only hurt yourself and the stupid, doesn’t hurt China as much as you expected.
    You won’t listen, you will continue, I

  236. “their basic IQ level”

    Let me see if I get this.

    denying someone the ability to learn to read, write and do even basic math . . . has no impact on IQ, which requires all three. And that practice over over more than four years would not have an impact on the targeted societies — intelligence in the society that would test for the same.

    absolute nonsense.

    At the very least you have to admit the inability to actually test said population as they had no experience exercising the very mechanism to be tested – using the same tools no less.

    oy.

  237. @Anon

    what are you..white, mixed, Indian, Chinese…what, who?
    over the past 500 years you have helped shape the world far more than I. you can write me off, inherently dotish, incpable and stupid. I did nothing..only you did.

    can we then judge you by the way the world is?

    yes we can! and the world is a divided inhate of itself, polluted, blasted, one step from nuclear war piece of shit, with the white hegemon running rampant, killing every positive thought, potential and person that rises into sight, razing countries, imposing the very stupidity you accuse of on the rest of the world. not smart, positive, do the right thing and die. be an arsehole and live!

    you gave the world the term and reality, the activity of Regime Change. you are the killer and the thief..take other peoples lands and kill them off..genocide.. another of your terms of destruction of nature. and you are not even ashamed… you are in such process all the time

    thats you man..thats is what you praise as smart, the world you love and on which basis you call me inherently stupid. I did none of that in my time, when I shaped the world. now I did some of that insanity too but you were there white uncle, deep, causing it. depopulation was never my thing…thats your word and deed. I did not even know the term until you gave it life and expression. I did not make AIDS, Ebola..please the continue the long list of such killer deasese made and introduced by you

    you want the whole world, to rule the whole world, for the world to contain only you and your mind. but isnt it obvious that nature does not conform to anythng of the sort?

    nature is dialectical, active, always in motion and as a result aways changing, evolving. there is no universal permanent law as a result, life, existence is pliable, change itself. the human species needs all it can muster in order to cope and stick around in nature. we have to know, must now and be able to do in response to the challenges to our chance at existence nature throws up all the time. the contribution of one ethnic gtoup of our human species is far, far from enough to achieve and ensure human survival. the functioning of the entire species in excelsis even, is still not enough..has not been enough so far..far, far from enough, look at our parlous state in existences as we speak..so much to do, to know to solve. but such excellent and responsive human organization and function in nature to nature and in concert with nature is our best chance

    who is the idiot then, the death merchant, who made it so and and continues to all the time?

    who is he calling stupid when his own kind poisoned all the food and gave it to him too, to eat? every day he opens his mouth to feed himself and all he has to eat is shit his own made, that kills him early just as dead as the rest of us.

    nature has expanded as it should biologically/culturally, producing greater and greater diversity.. of experience and responses to existential conditions, giving humanity better chance of going on in nature all along the way.

    This jackarse who brays here took that very diversity produced by nature, the real natural god, Nature! and turned it into a tool of human division and desruction. he went to Africa and saw african historical culture, took what he wanted, supressed the rest…then turned what he took away to Europe into vast divisive relgions that have posioned humanity intellectually, philosophically creating the most incredible jackarse sky gods with such manipulated and idiot philosopical underpinnings, that they have turned he himself into a faith believing, punitive, murderous donkey, for whom the very religions give him justification to murder humanity..justification he input himself into his faith and forgot he put them in and why.. and now believe sintrinically that he is super, better. and for those reasons and more of pure faith, he has the right to cull the human species as he see fit..in the process contrbuting to his own destruction

    pleae tell me how the human species is going to survive if it does not contintue to expand, develop social systems that bring all humans on stream for the express and signal purpose of facilitating human indefinte survival in natural condtions?

    humanity cannot survive as we go now, have gone ever since we came out in exploitative social organzation. there are no positive outcomes for the people of the world engaged in systems of exploitation of their own ordinray people by an elite few.

    all systems of parasitic exploitative social hierachies can only act in preservation of its status and will produce increasing human suffering and as means and methods improve in time technologically such socieities may succeed in imposing permanance of that kind of social ongranization on humanity. and such social organization of course is opposite to what is required in nature for humanity to survive indefinitely….and that would be that

    I am not death man! where I have been horrific was in having to live estern life..the total horror in existence called western life..exploitation and punishment..punishment in everything when human is born in ignorance and must learn how to live to the extent we have succeded in our livign project so far. why punish people for mistake especially when they were/are exploited, taught to hate themselves, taught nothing positive and set up vicious systems of punishnment that are profit driven anyway. punishement is systematic, has evolved into just a systematic way of making vast profits at low cost.

    there is no reclamation in punishment. the whoile process of punishemtn is not to relaim lost souls but to totally, exhaustively exploit them then discard the carcas if their dead body is useless..or if in death profit can still be made of their body parts.

    those are the smarts of this commentator here, his brilliance as part of the smart people, the superior people. he has contributed to the construction of the house of horrors that is now planet earth..and calls me stupid for my oppostion to the death he has imposed on life. he says he is going to kill me because that is what I deserve..Judgement again: he is superior! but not him..he has a white master too, for it is only a few whites who are really in charge. and they have as much contempt for him as they do for me. they are killing him too.

    who is the donkey then..who really deserves the death that is stalking?

    nobody does! we need to clean up the hierachies, dispatch the elites to do real work for a living and make horizonatl social organzations, created by ordianry folk as they go in response to existential need, in their vrious cultures all over planet earth. that is what will expand humanity as we go giving us our best chance of successful rsponse to natural challenge as we continue to disvover life, come to know what it is and develop means as we go.

  238. @ben sampson

    Stupid is as stupid does Anon..and all you have done in the world has been and is destructive no matter how you celebrate that crap, and the killers you have raised up to hero and sainthood

    you were hungry cold and murderous in Europe broke out and tried to steal the world. but this is a new day..we know more that we ever did. we know that that such behavior is counter-productive inconsistent with human indefinite survival in nature. if we are to go on we must build a different and opposite culture as discussed already

    for you stupid is as stupid does..you need desperately to redifine stupidty to come into a more accurate and whole idea of what stupdity is. it is dialectical and manyy sided, it cn shed old meaning and create new relevance. and as for dialectics a thing in existence, of the world, can contain oppostions that may consume it in its own struggle, needs no extenal cause or enemy to force such disintegration

  239. and look at our friend Paul Kersey once more on the front page with fresh racist nonsense. the problem is the social system by which we live that exploits everybody save the exploiters..not the nonsensical way Kersey presents his view of it.. ‘Black people tare to be Blamed for the state or racial relations in the US.’

    punishment is part of the social control mechanisn. punishment should not be a part of the social reality. punishment is built into life..the learning process. if you make mistakes in nature nature will teach you different. nature will show you by demonstration where you were wrong what is right and the price you have paid to learn.

    that is how humans have learned everything we know..by trial and error and the development of our sophistication in the process of living. we modify what we know and teach our young up to the day so they may be free of egregious and costly error. and socially we make general security eliminating all minority vested interests in social control in whose interest it is to punish humanity into compliace with its exploittion of the people.

    Anon accuses who is stupidity, ignorant! incredible! yet I imagine he tolerates Paul Kersey. Paul Kersey is a study in manipulateive ignorance and deliberate, calculated bad-mindedness, a byline cout to create bad results from the work presented under its rubric.

    Paul Kersey makes no contribution to the positive development of knowledge and awareness relevant to his subject matter. Kersey wallows in ignorance on race and ethnicity, american history and economy and the social relations sch has given rise to. Kersey is always in punishment , blame, and instigation of potential atrocious reward for his readers…which is no reward at all but the consequences of deliberate manipulation….at some point the flushness of murder and blood flowing like rivers, as whites are instigated mad enough to start killing Black people as they see them everywhere

    that is Kersey, a smart man deliberately trying to exploit and develop the stupidity of those who read him. Kersey just goes on and on…no explanation, no real facts, no expansion of discussion..just lowest denominator emotional stuff. incredbile!

    were I Unz Kersey would have to raise his level or begone. I would not tolerate that nasty propaganda on my blog

    • Replies: @Phil_from_NJ
  240. Gast says:

    I feel I have already read this article a thousand times since I became aware about the situation I am in as a member of a particular nation and a particular race. All the arguments Mr. Devlin is wheeling out are thrice familiar. This is not a bad thing. because I agree with Goethe that the basic truths must be hammered out in a repetitive manner, since the general public is fed with lies in an even more tiresome diet.

    But what I can’t forgive is that Devlin only mentions jews in positive words, describing them as a highly successful minority which has made its achievements because of its superior general intelligence, and he even agrees with the very fishy claim that Ashkenazi jews have an IQ of 121.

    I think the success of the jews is much better explained by their fraudulent nature (the fraud which generates them an unlimited amount of money with their central banks is the most important one, but there are myriads of other frauds, as many here know very well) and their nepotistic behavior (which is encouraged by their “religion” which sees non-jews as non-human beasts).

    Whether jews have a superior general intelligence is not so clear as Devlin suggests. In his study about the average IQ of different countries Richard Lynn gives Israel a surprisingly low average IQ of 90, and to explain this with the presence of Sephardi jews is not an option. You get an average of 90 when over a third of the nation have an IQ of 121 only when the Sephardi have an IQ in the range of sub-Sahara negros, which is not plausible at all.

    So Devlin’s treatment of the jews is not only morally revolting but blatantly wrong. This is no accident. Devlin is very negative about woman in general and White woman specifically (I don’t deny there are problems with White women but find Devlin’s very harsh treatment counter-productive) and the dark races, and is strangely negligent about the foremost problem which explains most of the symptoms which Devlin laments. I haven’t read his whole output but a large enough sample size to make this general claim. All in all, I came to despise Devlin as a traitor and this article has not changed my judgement.

  241. @ben sampson

    Ben,

    There is intelligence and stupidity, and then there is good and evil. Some people use their intelligence to do evil and not good. And I guess some intelligent people end up doing quite stupid things regardless of a high IQ test score. Most of what you are writing is the result of evil-doing. If intelligence plays a role then it is to make them more effective and efficient in doing their evil deeds.

    • Replies: @Commentator Mike
  242. @Commentator Mike

    I meant “writing about” so there is no misunderstanding about “writing”.

  243. Mr. XYZ says:

    If it were generally understood that whites are not responsible for the inability of most blacks to match average white levels of academic and professional achievement, racial tensions in America would be greatly eased.

    Possibly, but please keep in mind that blacks and Hispanics could simply resent whites (and possibly Asians and/or Ashkenazi Jews as well) in such a scenario for refusing to share more of their wealth with them.

    But children of the wealthiest twenty percent of black families still do worse in school than children of the poorest twenty percent of white families.

    The environmentalists could claim that net worth rather than income is the true factor that determines academic performance and success in school.

  244. Mr. XYZ says:
    @Diversity Heretic

    Couple that with the low fertility of high IQ women spending their most fertile years in the work force, and European-origin people are heading for a perfect evolutionary storm.

    Don’t high-fertility Ultra-Orthodox Jewish women often also work a lot in order to earn some money for their families while their husbands are busy studying Jewish religious texts? If so, this shows that a group can have high-fertility while nevertheless having a large number of career women.

    • Replies: @Phil_from_NJ
  245. Corvinus says:
    @Really No Shit

    “Gut feeling?”

    LOL. No, that doesn’t cut it. Sources, please.

  246. @Anonymous

    “I don’t understand the hostility against Africans and the mixed American blacks. “

    If you moved to Newark or Camden, New Jersey–better yet, Detroit, Michigan–you’d understand REAL quick.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  247. @Mr. XYZ

    “Don’t high-fertility Ultra-Orthodox Jewish women often also work a lot in order to earn some money for their families while their husbands are busy studying Jewish religious texts?”

    Yeah, “studying” those times they’re not defrauding the goyim or local, state or federal governments–among other things. Lol.

    Here, have a look:

    “Chabad specializes in financial fraud. Chabad Rabbis are experts in manipulating people and stealing money from them. Chabad takes advantage of the various grants and government assistance plans for needy children to obtain large amounts of money, illegally and fraudulently, from all jurisdictions. In the USA alone, Chabad makes hundreds of millions of dollars, maybe even billions of dollars, every year, through its network of schools. Additional money is made in other countries where similar government programs are available. Chabad obtains money from local, state, and federal sources. On top of that, Chabad Rabbis also make several millions of dollars from private donations that end up in their offshore bank accounts.”

    https://www.chabad-mafia.com/fraud

    “It is a widely known fact, in Jewish religious circles, that Chabad finances their international network of thousands of Chabad schools and Chabad houses mostly with the profits from their drug trafficking and drug dealing activities. Chabad houses have been strategically located in areas where there is a high volume of illegal drugs activity. Take for example the city of Tijuana in Mexico, a city where there are no Jews. The Chabad house in Tijuana is the oldest Chabad house in Mexico, and Tijuana is the most important city for drug traffickers moving their drugs from Mexico to the USA. Chabad houses also provide money laundering services to drug dealers and other criminals.”

    https://www.chabad-mafia.com/drugs

    • Replies: @anarchyst
  248. @ben sampson

    “and look at our friend Paul Kersey once more on the front page with fresh racist nonsense. “

    “Racist nonsense” that can be backed-up with lots of evidence and firsthand experience.

    Nice try but you failed.

    • Replies: @ben sampson
    , @ben sampson
  249. @Hang All Text Drivers

    “Liberals tell us the races are different physically but identical mentally!!! How did such an absurd idea ever get started?”

    How? The question should be who started it? The same (((group))) of imperious control freaks and nation-wrecking devils that created Communism.

    (((Franz Boas))) was one of the main culprits.

  250. @AaronB

    “Look at how skinny European Jews went to Israel and became physically tougher than locals who had been farming and doing physical labor for centuries.”

    By doing what? Lifting weights? Lol. For sure it was not (exceptions notwithstanding) by doing farming and physical labor same as the locals.

    • Replies: @anarchyst
  251. @AaronB

    “and the main problems are the culture wars and the huge inequality

    The Jew always sings the same tune…

    P.S. If you’re not a genetic Jew, you’re “a Jew between the ears”, so there’s no difference.

  252. anarchyst says:
    @Phil_from_NJ

    A chabad organization is being sued by a synagogue member who was injured during the recent synagogue attack. The chabad got a “security grant” from the government and spent it on entertainment instead of installing cameras.

  253. anarchyst says:
    @Phil_from_NJ

    It was criminal jew gangs that displaced the occupants of the land of Palestine. These same “gangsters” are running israel today…

  254. @Phil_from_NJ

    failed how? do you think I amlooking to hit Kersey for some malicious reason?

    you guys miss the point totally. you are racist and silly thats why? I seen an america divided and self destructive as a consquence of the manipulation of one overiding powerful group taking ameirca to the cleaners. Kersey is one of them spining hisissue as race only, focusing such . as you on the issue as race

    now I assume you are a true blue white american man..so while you are focused on Black people as directed by Kersey what is hapening to your partrimony USA?

    Right! it looks like its your turn to be destroyed now, along with the continuing destruction of all other americans you once helped to destroy..especially those of color. you may be so racist that you do nto see how what Kersy does is tied into your own white woes at this time.

    you talk about facts! I see Black people doing nothing that you once did all the time..to them. and have you actually stopped..and by you I mean all whites.. preying on Black people in America?

    no you have not! what Kersy is doing for example right here in our faces is using Black American people as prey, and tool of distraction, to stoke up white people when whites are getting beaten-into the ground themselves…their guns being taken away, police state extending all over, over run by immigrants, whites under over-all cultural/social attack

    Both Blacks and whites in teh USA have beenmanipulated behind an 8-ball. they both have no choice but to join up to fight their one and the same enemy, to give them their best chance of success. instead they are at each others throats and fighting each other. I wonder if such as Paul Kersey has anythng to do with that?
    hahahahaha

    • Replies: @Commentator Mike
  255. @Phil_from_NJ

    it does not matter if the incidents are true fales..it is how Kersey presents them his game is racist and his intent contains divide and rule, misfocus targeted groups to hide more egregious projects going on that harms these groups

    there are what 50-60 million Black Americans?

    I am sure that among 50 million people you can walk in any time of the day and find all manner of events going on you take pictures of and cast as you wish in the media call it factual

    I am not worried at all if they do take away the what the discipline? I would bet good money the schooling actually improves without the horror of constanrt punishment. nature has its own built-in discipline. you learn and survive..you fail to learn and do not survive

    you learn to grow food so you can eat. you dont learn..well as long as the free fruits last in the bush you may get something to eat if you learn how to climb trees and pick fruit. once that is done so are you.

    there is natural discipline everywhere and once humanity actually lived by that form and structure of social organization. then power hungry minorities learned how to create fake disciple out of life itself by which they could control majorities and they did so..and insinuated the fake program between nature and man, replete with lists of crimes and punishment, police and magistrates, lawyers etc

    thats right..they made crime out of natural consequence in nature of behavior and hired police and built jails to control humans..and made us pay for all of it too..with interest and profits for them included

    hahahaha

  256. @ben sampson

    Both Blacks and whites in teh USA have beenmanipulated behind an 8-ball. they both have no choice but to join up to fight their one and the same enemy, to give them their best chance of success. instead they are at each others throats and fighting each other.

    I agree with that; divide et impera is an old MO that never fails the rulers.

    I wonder if such as Paul Kersey has anythng to do with that?

    He’s the equivalent of many black commentators on black sites who focus on police brutality, historical crimes of whites against blacks, racism, etc. They have a right to express their views even though it may fuel black attacks on whites.

    There’s racists everywhere, of all races. You aren’t going to cure that just by banning people. Racism has both negative and positive aspects. One positive is that it at least protects members of a specific race from racial physical attacks by racist members of the other race.

    I think ideally multiracial society should be divided into three sectors: all white, all black, and a mixed one for those capable and willing to mix with least detriment to each other (or more sectors to accommodate other races if they are present in the society). That would be the safest option, including banning the hardcore black and white racists to roam in the mixed sector preying on those they hate. And each sector to police itself. But forcing people into each other’s areas, as is being done by the political overlords and property speculators, that is a recipe for disaster.

    • Replies: @ben sampson
  257. Phil from New Jersey…..

    I took a look at some his comments on other threads and he appears to be a brilliant individual for whom understanding such as Paul Kersey should be easy meat, no trouble at all.

    whats going on then..why his light question to me on Kersey that suggests he Phil from NJ thinks that Kersey is his ‘friend’ as a white man?

    interesting!

  258. @Commentator Mike

    all the media racist or every color likely have the same paymaster..divide and rule.

    I am not banning anbody. were I Unz Kersey would exist on my site as he exists here. I would froce him into context, he wold have to build a proper overall case that justifies what he is going in logic and sense and for positive outcome.. purpose for all to see.

    all of that would be according to the principle on my masthead as I thought I saw somewhere about the Unz and its stated purpose as a blog

    if Kersey could not satisfy that demand he would be tossed..may not have made the cut to begin with.

    but speaking of banning Kesey banned me..not I him. Kersey is a most dictatoral and undemocratic fellow who does not believe in free speeech…certainly does not practice free speech on his threads. and he found a unique way of censoring me as I described once before

    I looked at your ‘resolution for racism’ CM and it proves your capitalist perspective..you believe in the status quo and leave from that point. I do not. there isnt much philosophically western I take seriously, nor social organization etc. what I like is the hard scientific advances that the west are responsible for, for massive food production and relative technologies..all ‘gadgetry that has made life very entertaining..Radio/TV/Computers/in the kitchen/Consumer cars.

    the western culture perspective is massively minority and subjective, equally massively flawed and limited and inconsistent with the general good of humanity

    nothing lasts forever and all that takes place comes from what went before. and the quality of what comes about is strongly influeced by what we ourslves chose to do previously. it follows that if we want good social outcomes we can consciously bring them about by setting them up ourslves relative to what we discover is possible at anytime we are still here and living, minding and adhusting as we go as more and more becomes possible helping our accuracy, skills, plannign etc

    we have come to understand much about how society evolves and thoat is tool to use in construction a life in tune with indefinite human survival in nature.

    I take off from such regions. humans live on planet earth and that is one diverse reality that confronts us with a collective for HUMAN survival realtve to how that may be possible in universal conditions. we have come to know some but there is a whole massive lot more to know and to be able to use to effect our pressing urgent requirement in anseer to the basic question how does humanity survive indefinitely in an evolutionary universe .

    it is not how Black people survove, or white, Indians and Chineses…that does not compute, makes no sense in reality. there are no gods as we have conceived and imposed on oursleves. the only power we actually know and out of which we came is nature. nature is therefore god until we can prove differently. the question is how does HUMANITY survive..a question that be answered and achieved only by the collective in social unity, achieved by overthrowing expoloitative divisive social systems and the elites who established, mind and hone them in place

    there is no principle of ethnic division that cannot be, and wont be overcome in the event humanity realizes its collective purpose and effects it by implementing what we refer to as socialist organization of society… developing the security of all humans on the basis of the massive productive forces and skills we have achieved, that outstrips the needs of even 8 billion on the planet.

    not even the Jewish chosen of god nonsense will be able to withstand popular social control in general prosperity and truth intellectual content about our universal reality, and what we must do, how we must live, in order to survive in it indefinitely. there is one reality diverse, matrix, exceedingly, endllesly complex but still one..that we must undertsand and become so facile in we an effect our own survival in it

    that to my mind is the purpose of it all so far. whatever… we must survive as a species..and I expect that all will follow as a result. if not, relative to us there is nothing. we are done.

    I dont see all you conclude to be the limit of our possibities as far as race goes. race racism as have know it is temporary. I am sure some white thought that slavery was permanent. I am old enough to remember racism so thing what is happening now, what has happened in my time to be stunning. look at Black people right now..presidnent and all of that. when I was younger that was unimaginable.

    I could not get a job because of my skin color. I got beat up and put down in school all the time..I subsequently came to understand that it was because I was bright and Black. that does not figure for the youth anymore..not as before for sure.

    look at the change that as taken place..incredible! and it is still capitalism. Imagine when such restraints are successfully removed by ordinary impostion of democracy, ending exploitative social formations: the sky literally becomes the human limit.

    nothing ultimately withstands truth, reality period. humanity will have to learn and come into line or die off. we must evolve, create social systems that bring us into line life, or end up with a Brave ‘New World’ which would speed up human slippage out of existence.

    please excuse my typos..I have run out of time today

  259. we must bring the entire human species on-line. the massive yet varied developed, developing human collective perspective is the only equality we have with nature in its vastness..that which gives us our best chance of figuring out how to survove indefinely in nature

    human division therefore is collective suicide. no small rump and minority of humans in charge, having reduced the number of humanity they allow to survive to idiots and servers, will be able to take humanity forward in nature, gurantee whole, healthy, full human suvival indefinitely

    . there is nothng we have found out so far that gives any such formation of society a chance of indefinite existence. and I dont know if Huxley and Orwell ever tackled and answered that question: how long can a group of 15 million people or so, survive as the only humans around, sentient, biologically whole, free and elite take humanity forward ???

    that looks like suicide to me. nothng but the entire species in all its diversity on all levels of existence can achieve that..and it yet wont be easy for all that

    • Replies: @ben sampson
  260. @Kratoklastes

    The idea that someone is “halakhically” Jewish only if his mother or maternal grandmother was “genetically” Jewish, or made out of God-given Jewish substance, was introduced by Ezra who realized that mothers have a predominant influence upon their children, and that he had to counter the influence of non-Jewish mothers. Around 397 BC Ezra created the “Pharisees,” or Persianized Jews who had adopted exaggerated Zoroastrian purity laws. And Ezra and his Babylonian scribes composed the Torah. He developed the Moses mythology and the “Captivity in Egypt” with the Exodus to promote his own “exodus” of Jews (with royal Persian support) out of Babylonia to Palestine. Ezra demanded that his follower Jews who had non-Jewish wives divorce them. Some would not and joined the Samaritans who are the oldest surviving branch of “Jews” who are pre-Pharisee and even pre-Sadducee. Unlike the matrilineal Pharisees, the Karaite Jews, who are left-behind pre-Ezra Sadducees from Babylonia, hold that a Jew is a Jew only if his father is Jewish, independently of what the mother is. Karaites used to be forty percent of all Jews but are now worn down to some thirty thousand, mostly in Lithuania and Crimea. The Jews of Central Asia were Karaites but were re-programmed as Pharisees by a Sephardic Jew from Morocco three hundred years ago. Interestingly, the East European Karaites (there are also old time Egyptian ones) are aware that they are Khazars who converted to Judaism around 732. They admit their ancestors were converts and not “originally” or “racially” Jews. This is of course true of all the Ashkenazis, including the Pharisees. The Ashkenazis (meaning “Scythians” in Akkadian) were all originally Khazars who converted to Karaite Judaism. The Sephardi Pharisees in Toledo had a cow when they found out their Karaite rivals had converted a whole nation to their brand of Judaism. The Karaites not only honor Jesus, whom the Pharisees pathologically detested and eliminated, but even honor the Essenes, with a prayer to the leader of the Essenes. Moreover, the Karaites reject the Talmud as an innovation, and do not even recognize the Second Temple as legitimate. (They only recognize “Solomon’s Temple”). The eighth and ninth century Spanish Pharisees made it their priority to convert the Ashkenazi Khazars to Pharisee Judaism and did so in 860 with the “King Obadiah Reforms.” Their selling point was that the converts did not have a Jewish soul and so could not share in Jewish luck. But they could get a Jewish soul, and be recognized by the Sephardis as descendants of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, by converting to Pharisee Judaism. But not all Khazar Jews converted; the real conservatives account for the Karaite remnant today. The story of the conversion of the Khazars is in the fascinating composition known as the “Kuzari” which was written in Toledan Spain. Lenin’s mother and grandmother were Jews, specifically “Frankist” Jews, who were taught by the Shabbatean Jacob Frank that conversion “out” of Judaism was harmless, and did not damage your Jewishness. Thus Lenin, Halakhically, was a Jew, as his sisters maintained. Besides Lenin’s grandfather and great grandfather, who were Kabbalist Frankist Jews who converted, other Frankist Jews are Benjamin Disraeli, and Karl Marx, and thousands upon thousands more. The phenomenon has recently taken on new life in Poland and the Ukraine. Viz Poroshenko and Timoshenko, and all of the ruling clique of Poland since 1950.

  261. Anonymous[349] • Disclaimer says:
    @Phil_from_NJ

    I live in a 65% black city. Most are hospitable and aren’t always looking to sadistically take advantage of me because I am white unlike the races who are supposedly wonderful and high IQ. No one here views Asians as Americans but rather as newly arrived invaders who don’t have any incentives to reciprocate the cowtowing done toward them by the American far right

  262. @ben sampson

    do not divide and separate anybody CM. let the mixture proceed and the struggle therein. you are an ordinary man so the struggle of the ordinary people is yours too.

    take your side, be honest to it, develop your ordinary interest in all its directions and progressions, let it ramify into its total truth, so that you are as sophisticated as possible in knowing who you are, why you are doing what you do, and how it secures your future and that of your family, your children, everybodys children and families… and battle all to hell for it, all the way for it.

    it is the resolution of the process of struggle that clarifies everything, brings truth and victory allows us to create what will replace what you/we are battling against. it is that clarification that will resolve all racial and class issues and achieve human unity, end hunger, poveryty etc., ultimately regularizing everything inclduing history and the truth of our human story.. killing forever the divisive clap trap that currently passes for history..and all impetus and possibility of returning to exploitative divided society

  263. Okechukwu says:

    Your fraudulent IQ data notwithstanding (no credible African IQ data exists), what makes the most sense scientifically is that the smartest humans in the world are in Africa. Mutational load and low heterozygosity are higher out of Africa. It’s very unlikely that brain genes were spared and it’s highly likely that non-Africans are disadvantaged.

    Distance from sub-Saharan Africa predicts mutational load in diverse human genomes

    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2752555/

    Gene Discovery for Complex Traits: Lessons from Africa

    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2752555/

    • Replies: @RWS
  264. RWS says:
    @Okechukwu

    “[W]hat makes the most sense scientifically is that the smartest humans in the world are in Africa.”

    From a modern historical prospective, then, African culture before the age of European discovery — that is, before the late fifteenth century — ought to have shown such intelligence through creation of complex, productive societies, superior agriculture, organized settlement patterns, and “high” art. Aside from ancient Egyptian civilisation, it didn’t.

    So . . . do you advocate looking at other than civilisational evidence for the claim of “smartest”? Or are the smartest people unable to co-operate with others? I’m sincerely curious to know your reasoning here.

    (I am myself not much interested in competing claims of ability, to be honest. Instead, I’m more concerned with the kinds of societies, of scientific discoveries and applications, and of artistic expressions which the founder and developer populations of different civilisations produce.)

    • Replies: @Okechukwu
  265. “From a modern historical prospective, then, African culture before the age of European discovery — that is, before the late fifteenth century — ought to have shown such intelligence through creation of complex, productive societies, superior agriculture, organized settlement patterns, and “high” art. Aside from ancient Egyptian civilisation, it didn’t.”

    but Africa did! who told you Africa did not? and where did europe get all it got from in the first place?

    europe stole Africa..the whole thing, all of it.. then made the world into this:
    https://www.unz.com/avltchek/irans-hero-has-fallen-and-now-the-world-is-an-even-more-dangerous-place/

    that there is what you call smart, brilliant..that right there! Amargeddon! Limbo or Pure Hell! Africans were bever so motivated

    • Replies: @RWS
  266. RWS says:
    @ben sampson

    Right. I should have seen the trolls from the beginning.

  267. Okechukwu says:
    @RWS

    From a modern historical prospective, then, African culture before the age of European discovery — that is, before the late fifteenth century — ought to have shown such intelligence through creation of complex, productive societies, superior agriculture, organized settlement patterns, and “high” art. Aside from ancient Egyptian civilisation, it didn’t.

    Funny, you’re on the Internet but you’d rather remain in ignorance than take a few moments to look up African civilizations or kingdoms. The incuriosity of some of you people is stunning. To be incurious is actually a mark of stupidity.

    That being said, civilization as you understand it does not necessarily denote intelligence. Do you imagine that the Ancient Egyptians or Nubains would’ve been impressed with European “civilization?” No. The Egyptians and Nubians would’ve seen Europeans as utterly uncivilized barbarians not very far removed from wild animals.

    • Replies: @ben sampson
    , @RWS
  268. @Okechukwu

    could not have said it better myself… for real. (smiley)

  269. RWS says:
    @Okechukwu

    That you regard the Internet as the source of reliable information explains much. You may have been typing more in ignorance than in bitterness.

    Really, all I wanted was to understand the causes of your misconception. Now, I do.

    • Replies: @ben sampson
  270. MBII says:
    @Rahan

    How common are violent gangs of Arabs is Western countries?

  271. MBII says:
    @Bert

    You seem to have completely missed the point of the person you replied to

  272. @RWS

    all information, history..analysis and conlcusions on everything are incomplete..regardless.

    it is not possible to know everything about anything so the approach to everything is openminded. we come to know enough about most things to be able to act effectively. we prove enough truth to be ‘successful’ to win satisfactory achievement all the time, to be able to go on, to advance all the time

    the African history that is available overall is quite enough, more than enough to prove the claims by me, and back-up Okechukwu’s advice to you..to read African history on the net. if you prefer go to a library..or seek and buy the best histories you can find

    here are 2 names available on the net that beyond reproach: Charles S Finch and american…and Cheikh Anta Diop an African. go read and parse the work of those 2. and from those 2 you can follow deep into African history by the references and experts quoted and examined by those two.

    there is nonsense on the net but not all of it is…far from that. dig into those 2 names I listed. you should get their bios and reviews of their work, reviews of them personally..read those to satisfy yourself that they are indeed of the highest professional and scholastic quality, their work by quality beyond reproach… before you dig into their work

    • Replies: @Iris
  273. Slimer says:

    @RWS

    From a modern historical prospective, then, African culture before the age of European discovery — that is, before the late fifteenth century — ought to have shown such intelligence through creation of complex, productive societies, superior agriculture, organized settlement patterns, and “high” art.

    By this logic, Northern Europeans should have created complex, productive societies long before Arabs…given that the former group is more intelligent than the latter (according to HBD).

    (I am myself not much interested in competing claims of ability, to be honest.

    Actually, you are. But, like anyone else, you balk at the idea that “your” people are inferior to others.

    Nevertheless, the previous commenter is correct in saying that the smartest humans in the world are in Africa, i.e., that the intelligence distribution in Sub-Saharan Africa is bigger than in other parts of the world. He’s also implicitly saying that the dumbest humans are in Africa, which is equally true.

    Most biodiversity nuts respond to this fact by asserting “das not true,”
    because it challenges their comforting belief that the most brilliant individuals in the world should be white. In reality, black Africans exhibit a range of biodiversity not found in other populations, and it’s foolish to think that this has no effect on their ability to organize systems of governance where everyone’s interests are more or less aligned. It’s comparatively easy to organize Euros and Asians because individuals in those populations are not very distinct from each other genetically, and this will all come to light once your coveted intelligence genes are discovered, along with the genes that control traits like “personality” and “sociability”.

    Of course, this doesn’t mean that Africa can’t compete with the rest of the world. But it does mean that, in order for Africa to survive, let alone thrive, it has to be ruled by leaders with a stronger-than-iron fist, and part of the development process has to involve imposing serious restrictions on who gets to reproduce.

    • Replies: @ben sampson
  274. Nobody seems to notice that Jews are dying out and declining in intelligence faster than non-Jewish Europeans and have been doing so since the 19th century. For anybody to be dominated by Jews, the Jews have to be intelligent and have to exist.

    As Jewish women became more educated and kept jobs after marriage, they stopped having enough children for Jews to maintain their population. This was more marked among intelligent Jews. The same effects happened among other groups when the same behaviour occurred. [email protected]

  275. @Slimer

    what role with regard to social change and development does technology, and how technology evolved plays in the organization of social relations, and how would affect your iron fist dictator if Africa is to prosper?

    and what indeed is prosperity..the western version, your version, which version?

    the impression I have is that humans must survive and do so indefinitely, go on forever if we can. that seems to be the defining purpose of existence..first you have to live. and that can be won only from nature.. and by our understanding of nature we develop abd the skiil by which we come to use what we learn to further our chances in nature

    therefore nature is the template, the factor that set the table of life, evolved life, and is the force we must deal with, in which we exist and from which indefinite survival may be won, if that is possible at all. nature is foremost, middle and last. not the sky gods and all religions past and present.. but nature, first and always

    its seems to me that we live by the wrong coordinates. we have created ideas of life that places forces or gods before nature, as the creator of nature and that is not so. we have insinuated ssuch forces between humans and nature, and such society are crazy nuts society brough the world to ruin, threatens an end to humanity before our time..or is it our time and in time having screwed up the planet?

    I dont know man but my view says the development of humanity is key..no iron fist dictator necessary. we are of a factor that has creted a unity, that organizes us and we dont know. we have divided oursles for shortsighted pruposes so ordianry people are not as ‘educated’ as they should be, as facile in the stage we have achieved as all should be. but humans are a unity and only as a unity can humanity surive in the most full development of all humans

    how in the hell will we survive other wise?

    how does humanity survive when only small minorities can play in the stage as we all should be able to? they pass and what do we do?

    the more we learn the more there is to learn. the reality we live in is extraordianry, massive, inter-connected and universal. there are Birkland currents, electric currents that are trillions of miles long connecting up universal regions, if not the universes whateve it is. these currents can photographed now. they can be seen by the naked eye when in glow mode

    these interconnected currents mean that there is the potential for action and reaction over huge areas of space and time..at speed vastly, massively faster than the speed of light. we are connected to the whole thing, part of processes we are only now becoming aware of. and there is more..always more..

    to survive humans must come to know and to develop essential facility in the process to win survival in existence. the only resource we have that is comparable to, and equal to what is developing, what exists, living, moving, functioning in their ways, expanding etc..or what is now seen as the vastness of nature and its endless potential.. is the human brain, its development producing human facility equal to the challenges humans face in nature

    that is one huge reason why we commit suicide by peresisting with capitalism and any system of exploitation majorities by parasitic minorities.. all the stupid limited ideas and concepts out of europe and its hegemonic derivatives.

    it is crucial that all perspective come on-stream, that would enrich humanity with great diversity, expand us to an extent that would give us a real chance in nature to go on indefinitely. the iron fist is counter productive..and will be made redundant by technological advance. society must change always as human society advances scientifically with truth, and the implements we make always, that constantly replace the old with the new. life must change to accommodate change..and no need for an iron fist is even necessary now anwhere at all..already out of date by human scientific and technological advance

    the god dam problem has been and are in fact the iron fists. they must become history, replaced by human unity in democracy by the people for the people, focused on and disciplined by reality… who we are, and what we live in and how in the hell we can go on it it for as long as we can

  276. Slimer says:

    @ben sampson

    Hard as I tried, I couldn’t make much sense of your comment. All I could glean from what you wrote is that you don’t seem to mind that Africa is fucked up, as long as you get to believe that the continent had a glorious past.

    If the current birthrate holds, by 2050 half the world’s population will be African, most of whom will be unemployed if Africa fails to turn up in the worlds of business and technology. Putting virtuous dictators in office is the only way to avoid such catastrophe.

    • Replies: @ben sampson
  277. @Slimer

    well not much sense is some sense.. so you did make at least a little sense of it anyway. thats good! I was exhausted last night..long hard day… and should not have responded then

    Africa is under western domination like in any other region of the world, and as Vlechek explains that means there is no real African indepenence to act in their own best interest..and the consequences of doing so…if any African nation manages to do that

    western domination means routine destabilization, alienation of resources, the prevention of the emergence of positive nationalist development and leadership..and the destruction of such leadership when it manages to emerge

    but african independence will be achieved and such development will stabilize and balance population..if indeed African population is a problem…or looms a problem

    and Africans need no iron fist of some dictator for such positive development. that is not a positive or necessary option. positive development is indeed the way life goes routinely..humans live in response to need, disciplined by need. that means people in their envronment always respond socially/culturally in positive ways to achieve their sustained livelihood in nature..must do so in order to live, assuring general survival

    the global destablizing factor over the past 500 years is europe and its USA derivative with their empires and capitalism, subsuming all global resources for their controlling minorities, restricting the development of nations, controlling those nations, forcing them to live contrary to their own best interests to faciliate western power, wealth and domination.

    that is what is responsible for all world dysfunction, war everywhere, constantly..preparation for war now a major source of profit in the west for their dominant gangster minorities: regime changes etc., pollution, crime, hunger, global lawlessness and lots more.

    revolutionary change is essential everywhere, especially in the west- Europe and the USA..to produce real popular democracy not iron fisted dictators. humanity has achieved a stage of development which to handle best, to go on at all in the process of, requires revolutionary democracy..or the stage will consume us

    that is all I am saying

    • Agree: Iris
  278. Iris says:
    @ben sampson

    here are 2 names available on the net that beyond reproach: Charles S Finch and american…and Cheikh Anta Diop an African.

    Cheik Anta Diop is produced breakthrough research and scholarly works of outstanding quality, which unfortunately haven’t been integrally/entirely translated from French to English.

    British researcher Martin Bernal’s “Black Athena: The Afro-Asiatic Roots of Classical Civilization” is also an excellent read.

  279. Anti-HBD says:
    @Franklin Ryckaert

    Not really. Many of them carried haplogroup E which is an African Ydna haplogroup.

  280. anon[241] • Disclaimer says:

    Above picture is fake as hell, Egyptians never depicted blacks like this in their hieroglyphs.

  281. Okechukwu says:

    It’s funny that a bunch of white nationalist retards, including Devlin himself, think that they’re somehow more intelligent than the people who invented jazz, blues, R&B, funk, Motown, rock & roll, reggae, ska, samba, gospel, rumba, house, techno, hip-hop, etc. LMAO.

  282. Anon[331] • Disclaimer says:
    @Really No Shit

    All species come from bacteria. There is nothing to fuss about

    What a dumb opinion. The only reason whites exist is because of natural selection and geographic isolation.
    We no longer have either of those, at least for white countries, so your point is retarded.
    What we are experiencing because of this, is dysgenics, or lowering of IQ. So no it won’t balance out

    • Replies: @Really No Shit
  283. Anonymous[331] • Disclaimer says: • Website
    @Jeff Stryker

    Wow your dumb

    First, it’s not all jews, it’s just Ashkenazi Jews WHO LIVED IN NORTHERN/EASTERN EUROPE. Wow your dumb. Other types of Jews have IQs much closer to the middle eastern average. Ashkenazi jews got their high intelligence from selective pressure and intermarriage between Europeans.
    This occurred AFTER the selection pressures for winter existed.

    2nd, East Asians lived in very cold environments that have winter. It’s likely they migrated from Siberia into Asia, hence the high IQs.

    Also, both Europe and east Asia have WINTER. Africa/India/Oceania/Mexico do NOT. Hence the higher IQs. The correlation between latitude and IQ is around 0.7-0.8. It is correlated with brain size as well. But again, go too far north and you don’t have the resources or have summer to sustain a population and may face malnutrition

    • Replies: @Jeff Stryker
  284. @Anonymous

    DUMB QUESTIONS

    …But Ashkenazi are the result of Middle Eastern Jews who intermarried with Italian women in Southern Europe and not Finns.

    …I lived in Dubai and it is much cleaner, better-run, safer, newer and shinier than American cities. Many of which are almost ready to fall down. If Arabs are so stupid, why are cities like Dubai nicer than many American cities. You never see the bad roads in Dubai that Michigan has. Public transport is much more efficient. I lived in Dubai, Oman and for a short period Kuwait and none of these had the poverty or crime of Phoenix or Michigan

    NB I’ve been through Mid-Michigan trailer parks almost as poor as what I witnessed visiting India. Nobody in Dubai-and I mean nobody-lives as badly as inhabitants of Michigan trailer parks.

    • Replies: @ben sampson
  285. @Jeff Stryker

    I was about to ask about the intelligence of white people and this answer makes my question redundant.

    white people are the superior intelligence among humans eh..and its a white person who makes that claim. iot figures

    • Replies: @ben sampson
  286. @ben sampson

    if the white elites stopped imposing on the planet, stopped regime-changing, stopped wars and destruction of nations etc, in fifty years the USA and Europe would be outstripped by nationalist governments the peoples of the planet would put up everywhere

    what the USA and Europe have been doing all the time routinely involved on the planet as they are, is the prevention of the development of the world, the siphoning off of the wealth of the world that should be put to the development of nations and regime-changing when they cannot prevent the emergence of good nationaist governments in the nations

    and what do they do with the wealth so siphoned?

    just look! hoarding of wealth that should be in use buildign up humanity..which it would be doing if white people did not/do not steal it: building arms, labs for the creation of unique diseases and chemicals to poison humanity with. there is a whole existing infrastrucutre in the world if it ever gets loose would kill-off humanity -including white people – by weapons and diseases..both of which I mean are the same thing..WMD!

    white people are not intelligent at all..they are insane, savage, dumb, blind..cant reason and deal with truth. there is no way humanity will survive much longer under white domination. white domination has meant only social horrors for the world..what we now have: WMD everywhere, the use of them against nations, lunatics like Trump in their van..and the even worse insanities who drive such as Trump from the shadows..the so-called Deep State..which is nothing if its not an asylum for the congregation of lunatics

    what an egregious waste of human time and opportunity in existence.. has been white domination of human society on planet Earth

  287. @ben sampson

    Everything communists say is a lie, ethics rejects the doctrine of materialism, or any doctrine that attempt to explain human societies from the narrow exclusive standpoint of preeminent material interests and deny any natural law, immutable expressions and natural order of the world.

  288. @anon

    “Nobody is born a Jew”…, but another Jew. Likewise, no dog is born a Greyhound, but another Greyhound. No Dachshund is born with the traits of and inclinations of a bull terrier and vice versa. Isn’t this obvious my dear Watson?

  289. gaijin says:

    With Respect to your excellent AmRen article, “1905: The End of the Omnipotent White Man”
    —————————–

    Russian Jews had long harbored enmity to the Czar. In the Japanese these early globalists saw a possible proxy for taking down the Czar a peg or three:

    While the navies of the Portugese, Dutch and British evolved over centuries incrementally, the navy of Meiji Japan sprung up out of nothing in the blink of an eye. Not surprising, if you consider the lavish funding that Jacob Schiff lavished upon Japan, later winning one of the country’s highest medals on the grounds of the Imperial Palace. VERY few historians cover this.

    But the plan by these “Russians” was not only to strike a blow against Russia, but also to gain exclusive, intimate contact FOR YEARS with all the Russian POW’s sure to fall into the hands of the Japanese; the “Russian” radicals would re-educate them and brainwash them in all the amazing glories of Proletariat Revolution, then send them back to Mother Russia.

    And the plan absolutely worked.

    So in sum, in the middle of the Russo-Japanese war, these “Russians” worked very hard against Russia, just as 10 or so years later “Germans” would work very hard against Germany.

    Gosh, I wonder if something similar could happen in the USA.

  290. @Anon

    Fancy words won’t set you free! And your opinion on my opinion proves that the dumbing down is making a very fast progress, ipso facto…

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All F. Roger Devlin Comments via RSS