The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 Travis LeBlanc Archive
The Goebbels Award
Hollywood & the Nazis, Part Two
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information


Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

All installments in this series available here

In the last article, I discussed how in the 1930s, Hollywood was reluctant to make any anti-Nazi movies for a variety of reasons — chiefly that the Nazi government might invoke Article 15 of their film quota law to ban the studio that made it in Germany.

So if you can’t make anti-Nazi movies, what about a pro-Jew movie? If you can’t build some animosity against Hitler then maybe you can build some sympathy for Jews. Article 15 said you couldn’t make Germany look bad but it didn’t say anything about making Jews look good. That was the thinking of the two philo-Semitic gentiles behind the creation of the 1934 film The House of Rothschild. The House of Rothschild would end up being the greatest unintentional antisemitic propaganda movie of all time. They Live has nothing on The House of Rothschild. You can watch it here.

Darryl Zanuck
Darryl Zanuck

Darryl Zanuck was an ethnic Swiss Protestant raised in Nebraska and head of production at Warner Brothers. He had previously produced two pro-Jew movies that went on to be big hits: The Jazz Singer and Disraeli, which received an Academy Award nomination for Best Picture.

One day in 1933, Zanuck announced that he was giving everyone at Warner Brothers a pay raise. Studio boss Jack Warner was furious at this and countermanded Zanuck’s decision. This lead to a falling out between Zanuck and Warner Brothers. Zanuck soon left Warner Brothers to team up with Joseph Schenck of United Artists to start a new studio: Twentieth Century Pictures. Twentieth Century would later merge with Fox in 1935.

With his new company set up, Zanuck managed to persuade three big Warner Brothers stars to come join him in his new venture: Constance Bennett, Loretta Young, and George Arliss, whose performance in Disraeli had won him an Academy Award for Best Actor. Seeing that Zanuck and Arliss had such success with the pro-Jew film Disraeli, they thought it might be a good idea to make another. This was the origin of what would become The House of Rothschild.

George Arliss
George Arliss

British-born George Arliss was enthusiastic about the project as he was himself a great admirer of the Jews. “No one has a keener appreciation of what the world of science and art and literature owes to the Jews than I, and no one has greater sympathy with them in their unequal fight against savagery and ignorance.” Arliss traveled to England in order to research the history of the Rothschild family but not before creating a minor controversy by taking a German ship to get there.

I had never watched The House of Rothschild before I started researching this article. I was aware of its existence but I had no interest in watching a movie about Jews, nevermind one that portrayed the Jews as the heroes nevermind one that portrayed the freakin’ Rothschilds as heroes. But then I stumbled upon the factoid that Joseph Goebbels allowed The House of Rothschild to be shown in Nazi Germany with only minor edits, and that got me curious. I decided to watch The House of Rothschild to see if I could figure out what the Nazis liked so much about it and. . . they should have called it The JQ: The Movie. It has all the tropes and quite a few canards as well. Only bluepilled gentiles could have made this movie.

The House of Rothschild opens in 1780 in Frankfurt, Germany. In the opening shot, we see a sign that says “All Jews must be in the Jew Street by sundown. — Chancellor of Prussia.”

In his house on Jew Street, we see family patriarch Mayer Rothschild, his wife, and their five sons. Mayer is counting his stacks of money and business is doing gangbusters. Mayer’s son comes in to tell him that the taxman is coming. So then all the Rothschilds start scrambling to hide all their giant stacks of money. They cover up the expensive pot roast they are cooking and Mayer tells his kids to “look hungry.” When the taxman arrives, Mayer shows him fake account books to make him think that business is going badly. The taxman is not fooled, but for a bribe of 5,000 gulden, he reduced Rothschild’s taxes from 20,000 to 2,000 gulden.

Now, what you’re supposed to think watching this is “Well, why should the Jews pay their taxes to a government that is so mean to them? They segregate them and make them live in that tiny ghetto. I would dodge my taxes, too.” But watching that scene redpilled, you’re just like “Man, these Jews are really greedy. They lie and resort to all kind of deception to avoid contributing to the common good of the nation and when the lies don’t work, will make illegal bribes to avoid paying their fair share. The guy’s a money lender. It’s not like he had to do any strenuous labor to get that money. The guys working the coal mines are paying their taxes. What the hell is this guy’s problem?”

We then see Mayer Rothschild on his deathbed. He orders his sons to split up and start banks in a different major European city. “Work and strive for money! Money is power! Money is the only weapon that a Jew has to defend himself with!”

Honestly, I don’t know what I am supposed to think of this. That society is forcing him to become fabulously wealthy? That he would love nothing more than to be out there digging ditches but it’s a matter of life and death that he loan money with interest? That he engages in usury because people hate Jews and not the other way around?

Mayer Rothschild dies and his sons split up. One Rothschild stays in Frankfurt, one goes to Paris, one to Madrid, one to Naples, and Nathan Rothschild, their leader and the protagonist of The House of Rothschild, goes to London. The Napoleonic Wars break out, and every European country turns to the Rothschilds for funding. The Rothschilds side with the allies over the French. Because the Allies won the battle for Rothschild funding, they are at last able to defeat Napoleon and he is sent Elba.

Now, what you’re supposed to think watching that is “Well, it’s a good thing we have these Jews around to save us from that tyrant Napoleon. Lord knows what that Corsican monster would have done were it not for these Jews.” But watching this movie redpilled, you think “This small clique of Jews is deciding the fate of Europe.”

With Napoleon in Elba, Nathan Rothschild gets word that France is going to receive the largest loan of all time to help them rebuild. All the banks of Europe submit their bids. The Rothschild bank submits the best bid, but to Nathan’s shock, it is announced that the loan has been granted to Barings of London. Nathan demands an explanation, and the antisemitic Count Ledrantz (played by Boris Karloff of Frankenstein fame) tells him that it is because Nathan is a Jew. Nathan then uses his vast wealth to manipulate the stock market in such a way that Barings bonds become unsellable and they are forced to transfer the loan to the Rothschilds at a significant financial loss to themselves.

Now, what you’re supposed to think watching that is “Well, serves them right for being antisemites!” But watching that scene while redpilled, you think “Jews manipulate the stock market for their personal gain and to resolve petty grudges at the expense of gentiles.”

Zanuck’s business partner Joseph Schenck actually did raise some concern about including Boris Karloff’s antisemitic character, because he would afraid that audiences would start cheering for him after his lines.

Boris Karloff as the antisemitic Count Ledrantz and George Arliss as Nathan Rothschild
Boris Karloff as the antisemitic Count Ledrantz and George Arliss as Nathan Rothschild

After that episode, Nathan Rothschild becomes stridently racist against gentiles and forces his daughter (played by Lorretta Young) to break off her engagement to Captain Fitzroy. In retaliation for outmaneuvering him, Count Ledrantz starts an antisemitic propaganda campaign that causes anti-Jewish riots to break out all over Europe.

Napoleon escapes from Elba and regains power. Four of the Rothschild brothers want to side with Napoleon this time, as he is more pro-Jew and it would be the smarter option financially, but Nathan says no. Napoleon is such a tyrant that the Rothschilds must put the good of humanity above their own self-interests. They set up a meeting with the Allies, and Nathan bluffs them that he will back Napoleon unless they call off the riots and grant Jews equal rights. The allies have no choice but to agree.

With Napoleon back and on the move, the London stock market goes into a panic. Nathan dumps his entire fortune into it to keep it from crashing because he is just such a humanitarian. When news of Waterloo comes in, the market recovers, and Nathan, because he bought the dip, becomes the wealthiest man in the world.

Now, what you’re supposed to think watching that is “Thank God for those Rothschilds or else we would all be speaking French right now.” But watching the film redpilled, you think “These Jews become fabulously wealthy off war and human suffering without ever having to pick up a gun themselves. European leaders are forced to grovel at their feet and give in to their every demand or else the Jews will allow them to be destroyed by their enemies.”

The House of Rothschild is a movie that could only have been made by bluepilled philo-Semitic gentiles. A Jew would have known to avoid the tropes and an anti-Semite would have emphasized them in a much more heavy-handed way. The House of Rothschild seems to skip along casually dropping antisemitic tropes blissfully unaware that it is doing so.

When the Anti-Defamation League learned of the plot of The House of Rothschild, they started freaking out. They immediately recognized the tropes. The ADL sent a letter to Zanuck to try to get him to cancel the film:

The impression which will be made is that the concentration of wealth in the hands of one international Jewish family invested that family with indisputable power to determine the destinies of nations. The very fact that Christian nations must beg of the Jewish Rothschild family for money with which to protect their own existence will in itself create a most undesirable reaction.

ADL national secretary Leon Lewis called it “one of the most dangerous presentations” of Jews of the era. He urged Zanuck to get in touch with “those among our people . . . who have been devoting all their energies in the past few months to stemming the rising tide of hatred against the Jews.”

Zanuck responded to the ADL:

I am not a Jew and I have never heard of this “rising hatred of Jews” that you speak about in your letter, and I am inclined to believe that it is, more or less, imaginary as far as the general public is concerned. We make pictures for the broad general public rather than the minority and I will guarantee you that if there is such a thing as a “rising hatred for the Jew in America” our film version of ROTHSCHILD will do more to stop it than anything, from the standpoint of entertainment.

Having no luck with Zanuck, the ADL then turned to the Hays office. In a letter to Will Hays, the ADL stated:

It is important that nothing be done now that might possibly feed the unreasoning prejudice against the Jews which is in some places. A widespread factor in this unfair and prejudiced attack is the false allegation that all Jews acquire money for power, with the inference that such power may be misused. The historical prominence of the house of Rothschild is such that hostile propagandists have tried to make the very name a synonym for sinister, world-wide political power, growing out of accumulated riches. The fact that in the case of the Rothschilds the power of money was rightly used may be overshadowed by the greater impression of the Rothschilds as an example of Jewish power through domination by money.

The Hays office agreed that the film had the potential to cause problems. In response, Zanuck put on some preview performances of The House of Rothschild and sent Hays 175 preview cards from audience members praising the film. The National Council of Jewish Women even previewed the film, giving it their thumbs up. The Hays office was satisfied that people were not picking up any antisemitic vibes from the movie and dropped the matter.

Having failed with Zanuck and the Hays office, the ADL had another option. They appealed to the Jewish studio heads throughout Hollywood to see if they could use their influence to kill the movie. The ADL sent a telegram to Louis B. Mayer, the most powerful man in Hollywood and a majority shareholder in Twentieth Century Pictures:


Louis B. Mayer sat down and watched The House of Rothschild with Harry Cohn, head of Columbia Picture. Neither of them found anything wrong with it. The ADL then went to Louis B. Mayer’s rabbi Edward Magnin to see if he could talk sense into Mayer. According to Leon Lewis, Magnin “lit into” Mayer and told him that

the conditions in the industry were responsible for a great deal of the prejudice existing and that it is ironical that on top of it they should show so little sense as to promote a film of this type at this time. He said they were digging their own graves and that they would alienate the Jews as well.

The ADL also appealed to Jack Warner of Warner Brothers to see if he could do something to stop the movie. The problem with Jack Warner is that Zanuck was his former employee and it would have been a bad look. Zanuck quits Warner Brothers after a falling out, starts a new company, and then Jack Warner immediately tries to kill his new film. Jack Warner would have ended up looking ultra-petty. Plus, Zanuck was a gentile and Warner was a Jew, so that might in itself create an antisemitic impression.

In the end, the ADL was unable to stop the release of The House of Rothschild. It would end up being a big hit for Twentieth Century Pictures and was nominated for the Academy Award for Best Picture where it would lose to It Happened One Night.

As for The House of Rothschild, the Nazis loved it. They would later use footage from The House of Rothschild in their antisemitic magnum opus Der ewige Jude. Twenty minutes into Der ewige Jude, they play a clip from early in the movie and the narrator states “Here we show a scene from a film about the Rothschild family. It was made by American Jews, obviously as a tribute to one of the greatest names in Jewish history. They honor their hero in a typically Jewish manner, delighting in the way old Mayer Amschel Rothschild cheats his host state by feigning poverty to avoid paying taxes.”

After The House of Rothschild, it became the consensus around Hollywood that it might be a good idea not to make any more movies about Jews just to be on the safe side.

In 1937, Warner Brothers would release The Life of Emile Zola, a film about the eponymous French writer and his experiences during the Dreyfus Affair (watch it here). The Dreyfus Affair was a controversy that rocked French society for several years and involved a Jewish military officer who was accused of spying for Germany. Dreyfus’ Jewishness was a pretty central part of the controversy. Anti-Dreyfusards claimed Dreyfus sold out his country to Germany because Jews are rootless cosmopolitans incapable of real patriotism or loyalty. Dreyfusards claimed he was being scapegoated because he was a Jew. But in The Life of Emile Zola, the word “Jew” is not spoken a single time.

It would take several years longer for Hollywood to address the issue of Jews than Nazis. Confessions of a Nazi Spy, Hollywood’s first-ever anti-Nazi movie, mentions that the Nazis are racist but never addresses the persecution of minorities at all.

The first Hollywood movie to address the persecution of minorites in Germany was the 1940 Jimmy Stewart film The Mortal Storm (which you can watch here). But even in The Mortal Storm, the persecuted minority group is never identified as “Jews.” They are only ever referred to as “non-Aryans.”

The original screenplay for The Mortal Storm was apparently much more explicit about who was being persecuted and even included a scene where a Jewish father gives a speech to his mischling son on Jewish pride. “I’m proud to be a Jew. I’m proud to belong to the race that gave Europe its religion and its moral law — much of its science, too — much of its genius, in art, literature, and music. Mendelssohn was a Jew, and Rubenstein — the great English statesman, Disraeli, was a Jew, and so was our poet Heine, who wrote the ‘Lorelei.’”

This scene was cut out at the last minute — halfway through production, in fact. The reasons are obscure, but all signs point to the decision being made by the MGM big man himself, Louis B. Mayer.

Louis B. Mayer’s rabbi Edward Magnin offered a likely explanation. Magnin was granted a preview of The Mortal Storm, approved of the movie, and was not opposed to MGM’s decision to forego naming the Jew:

One thing in favor of our side now is that people may be sympathetic, (but not much), when they fear and now they are afraid. They hate the thing they fear — that is the answer. They can still hate Jews and still fear Germany!

In other words, it was less important that people like Jews than that they hate Nazis.

The first Hollywood movie to explicitly reference Jews in relation to Nazis was the Fox movie The Man I Married AKA I Married a Nazi (watch it here). This is a funny little movie and completely absurd. In The Man I Married, Joan Bennett plays an American art critic who is married to a good-natured German immigrant played by Czech-born Jewish actor Francis Lederer (who had previously played the Nazi spy in Confessions of a Nazi Spy).

Joan Bennett, Lederer, and their 7-year-old son travel to Nazi Germany. Once there, Lederer reunites with a childhood friend played by Anna Sten. She starts taking Lederer to Nazi rallies, and he immediately becomes a diehard Nazi. Suddenly, Joan Bennett now finds herself married to a raving Nazi fanatic.

The idea that Hitler and Nazi ideas had a magical power to turn ordinary people into hysterical bloodthirsty maniacs was be promoted even back then, before the United States had even entered the war.

The movie has a twist ending that I am going to spoil for you. At the end, Bennett is disgusted and wants to return to America, but Lederer insists on staying in Germany and keeping their son. Lederer gets into an argument with his anti-Nazi father about it and then his father drops a bomb on him: Lederer’s mother was actually Jewish which makes Lederer himself a half-Jew. Furthermore, dad threatens Lederer that if he does not let Bennett return to America with their son that he will report him to Nazi authorities. Bennett gets the kid and goes home.

That is the first time Hollywood explicitly references the Nazi persecution of Jews by name. The Man I Married was released in August of 1940.

(Republished from Counter-Currents Publishing by permission of author or representative)
Hide 167 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. But how can there be any sin involved in treating gentiles this way if you believe the precepts of the Talmud and that gentiles are not fully human? Of course anyone who has a functioning conscience realizes this is evil but what then does that say for the spirit of modern Judaism? The Nazis made a big mistake on taking on Jewish racism by adopting another form of racism. The outcome is the complete subjugation of the West but then again evil has no eternal future.

    In this world it is put to good use by forcing us to differentiate the good from the bad and choosing rightly. The temptation of Jesus in the desert is a crucial scene in this respect. He rejects the offer of the entire world offered by Satan but does not deny Satan has the power to make the deal. Elsewhere the NT states the devil is prince, i.e. ruler, of this world. Jesus also declares that it is a very bad deal for a person to exchange their eternal soul for the entire ephemeral world.

    If you accept in principle that there is an evil prince who runs this world then it would seem reasonable to look at those who appear to have the West in the palm of their hand and see what links them.

    • Disagree: Dennis Gannon
    • Replies: @Robert Dolan
    , @Mike Tre
  2. Very informative article, indeed myth-breaking . I had always assumed that 1930s Jewish-controlled Hollywood was completely hostile to Nazi Germany and was producing large amounts of anti-Nazi propaganda films. Completely untrue, despite what post-war propaganda may claim. Even minor details – I had lazily assumed Darryl Zanuck was Jewish – were enlightening.
    Thank you Mr LeBlanc.

  3. Chris Moore says: • Website

    I wonder if Daryl Zanuck set out to get revenge against the ((Warner)) brothers? But that’s the problem with WASP’s — they’re too subtle, whereas ((Jews)) have correctly judged the character of the ignorant masses and are blatant propagandists.

    The WASP’s good manners have led to their own demise and are leading to the demise of all Whites.

    Christians and Westerners should never be subtle about the threat the ((Jews)) and their scumbag collaborators pose to the world. These fake-((Jews)) see politeness as weakness and opportunity, to be exploited for money.

    That’s why the authentic Jew Moses went after the Hebrew trash hammer, tong and sword. He knew they mustn’t be allowed even an inch to maneuver.

  4. Is Travis Trevor?

    • Replies: @Random Anonymous
  5. Joan Bennett, Lederer, and their 7-year-old son travel to Nazi Germany. Once there, Lederer reunites with a childhood friend played by Anna Sten. She starts taking Lederer to Nazi rallies, and he immediately becomes a diehard Nazi. Suddenly, Joan Bennett now finds herself married to a raving Nazi fanatic.

    I think they remade it.

    • LOL: Beetlejuice
    • Replies: @Abbybwood
  6. E_Perez says:

    This series of Mr. LeBlanc is fantastic and very well researched!

    What I don’t understand is, that the German follow-up of the 1934 The House of Rothschild – the famous 1940 movie “Die Rothschilds” – is banned as anti-semitic. Both movies are more or less dealing with the same indisputable facts.

    • Replies: @El Dato
  7. I recently wrote a review of “They Live,” focusing on the allegorical aspects:

    • Replies: @europeasant
  8. “Look hungry!” That sounds like a Groucho Marx line.

  9. JimDandy says:

    You’re a good writer, LeBlanc.

  10. @Jack McArthur

    The German people were fighting fire with fire.

    You are not very…..astute.

    So…..Sherlock…..tell me….how can people fight against jewish influence without first uniting as a people?

    The outcome of the total subjugation of the west came not as a result of German actions….but the result of the actions of the Allies that sided with the Bolshevik regime.

    The United States (and Britain, France, Australia, etc) CAUSED the downfall of the west, the spread of communism, the destruction of Christendom.

    You think you can pray away the tyranny of organized jewry? You think maybe the MILLIONS of Orthodox Christians in Russia weren’t praying their asses off?

    They prayed and got mass murdered anyway.

    So….back to the solution… insinuate that whites having ingroup preference and acting for their own interests is “racist.” You do realize that every other group on earth (except whites) is allowed to do this? And jews are HYPER-ethnocentric….the single most racist group on the planet.

    Spare me the lectures about the evil Notsees… just reveals that you are a witless douche.

    • Thanks: Angharad
    • Replies: @HdC
    , @Koserte
    , @Jack McArthur
  11. @ approximately 43 minutes, we’re able to view the Jewish market manipulation in Zanuck’s film. Previously, we witnessed the Jew’s affront as the English preferred their own when it came to debt.

    It’s difficult to watch this without drawing some significant impressions about the population dynamics of a “rootless cosmopolitan” – indeed alien – population employing usury to enrich itself.

  12. El Dato says:

    “Anti-semitism” is the ink of the squid.

    • Agree: mulga mumblebrain
    • Thanks: Kratoklastes
    • Replies: @Fr. John
  13. Dumbo says:

    I didn’t watch this movie, but I watched “The Jew Suss”, which is not a bad movie, and not completely unfair to Jews. I guess it’s difficult to make movies about Jews. The Coens brothers “A Serious Man” is a relatively good movie about Jews. Some consider it anti-semitic, but it was made by Jews. There are other good films about Jews, but they tend to show Jews only as victims and to avoid any negative portrayals. Except perhaps for some films about Jewish gangsters, including “The Godfather part 2”.

    I think a good idea would be to make a horror movie based on Jewish folklore or history (perhaps based on “Bloody Passover”? The title is good for a horror film too). There are so many Jewish-produced horror movies based on Catholic themes, perhaps a Catholic producer/director could attempt a Jewish-themed horror movie.

    • Replies: @E_Perez
    , @lysias
  14. aj54 says:

    this article reminded me of a rather important characterization in the movie. Nathan Rothschild had an agent on the ground at Waterloo, who was to rush back to London the moment the battle was decided. The agent had a swift boat waiting for him, and he got there long before any others carried the story back. With the news, Nathan went to the stock exchange and started a whispering campaign about Britain losing and Napoleon winning. This caused the sudden dump in the market, and then when the market was crushed, Nathan stepped in and bought everything.

    • Agree: Peripatetic Itch
    • Replies: @Truth Vigilante
  15. Schuetze says:

    What a wonderful film review, there are so many interesting related themes to descuss…

    “Mayer’s son comes in to tell him that the taxman is coming. So then all the Rothschilds start scrambling to hide all their giant stacks of money. They cover up the expensive pot roast they are cooking and Mayer tells his kids to “look hungry.””

    A friend of mine is a water meter reader in Antwerp, which has been famous for centuries for its Jewish diamond cutters whose meters he reads. He told me that invariably he has to wait several minutes at the front door before the jews will let him in. He said that the houses all have an off-putting odor as well. Some things never change.

    “He orders his sons to split up and start banks in a different major European city. “Work and strive for money! Money is power! Money is the only weapon that a Jew has to defend himself with!””

    Jacob Schiff, raised in the Rothschild house in Frankfurt, was also sent to the US with the following goals

    1. Gain control of America’s money system through the establishment of a central bank.

    2. Find desirable men, who for a price, would be willing to serve as stooges for the Illuminati and promote them into high places in the federal government, the Congress, Supreme Court, and all the federal agencies.

    3. Create minority group strife throughout the nations, particularly targeting the whites and blacks.

    4. Create a movement to destroy religion in the United States, with Christianity as the main target. Nathaniel de Rothschild becomes Member of Parliament for Aylesbury in Buckinghamshire.

    It was Schiff who with Rothschild money not only financed Rockefeller, Carnegy and Harriman, but also the Russian Revolution because the Tsar would not allow a Rothschild controlled central bank. With control of all of the US FED in 1913, the Rothschilds embarked on overthrowing the Tsar with WWI. After the war the Jews not only were allowed to steal Palestine, they gained complete control of worldwide banking through the BIS which they created in order to collect the reparations the Jewish lawyers at Versailles imposed on the Germans.

    “In other words, it was less important that people like Jews than that they hate Nazis.”

    This statement is key to identifying limited hangouts even today. Many, many web sites, newscasters and bloggers who occasionally disparage Jewish Power are tolerated and allowed to exist because they constantly hammer on about “Nazis”, “Holocaust” and “Gas Chambers”. The Saker blog comes immediately to mind, but the same could be said about Tucker Carlson and many other “celebrities”.

  16. Schuetze says:

    “They set up a meeting with the Allies, and Nathan bluffs them that he will back Napoleon unless they call off the riots and grant Jews equal rights. The allies have no choice but to agree.”

    Here is an interesting 2 hour podcast with a Romanian named Pikachu about the Communist Revolution in Romania and its similarities to what is going on in the US. At 1h 50m She talks about how in 1880 after their war of independence from the Turks, the new Romanian king was being threatened by the US Jews that if he didn’t grant Romanian citizenship to Jews the US would not recognize the new Kingdom of Romania. This happened in Spain in about 2010 where they were forced to grant instant citizenship to the Sephardim.

    Pikachu describes how all these communist revolutions follow the same pattern:

    1. A stolen election

    2. Famine and starvation (Russia, Germany, Ukraine, Romania and China)

    3. Consolidation of power

    I would submit that now they have a new step 1.5. Pandemic and clot shot

    Gird your loins, there is a complete Judeo-Communist take over coming to the US.

    • Thanks: GMC, anarchyst, CauCasiAnn
    • Replies: @Beetlejuice
  17. @Schuetze

    That’s why their holocaust narrative in the linchpin of their power

    • Agree: Old and Grumpy
  18. @Schuetze

    “1. Stolen election”
    Trump wanted to lose, nothing was stolen

    “2. Famine ”
    They will never let german people starve again as they remember what happened last time. Until the majority isn’t germanic.

    “3. Consolidation of power”
    They already have total power

    • Replies: @Schuetze
    , @anonymous
  19. Trinity says:

    Tucker, like all (((conservatives on television))) also worships at the MLK shrine of puke.

    Tucker won’t even say the word “jew” much less go after them. He makes token gestures at condemning George Soros aka George Schwartz and might bring up some other (((shady characters))) but the j-word is never used, instead words like “deep state,” globalists,” “leftists” or the most laughable term to describe jews, “liberals” are the terms ALLOWED for nation wrecking anti-White khazars/jews. And of course as you mentioned, Tucker, like everyone in Washington aka West Tel Aviv, Jew Yawk or Hymiewood always has to bring up that Hitler and the Notsees were the epitome of evil and that the (((demsheviks))) are the real racists and MLK would not approve of (((BLM.)))

    • Agree: Schuetze
    • Replies: @europeasant
  20. anon[102] • Disclaimer says:

    Interesting, most interesting

    I don‘t have any data or hard facts but, most of the property taken away from the small hats in Germany after 1933 was due to tax evasion.

    • Replies: @Schuetze
  21. @aj54

    Yes aj54, in relation to Nathan Rothschild multiplying the net worth of the dynasty several fold on the outcome of the Battle of Waterloo, UR readers should reference this article:

    From that article:

    ‘Nathan found himself with an increase in wealth of 6,500 times more than what he had previously owned after his engineered stock market crash of 1815. In essence, he robbed Britain blind, and he became, for all accounts and purposes, the owner of most of England. From that point forward his family, with more wealth than they could have ever dreamed of, became an influential player in governments, and they steered policy decisions going forward, by bribing and paying politicians from that time onward.

    It also bears noting that this scheme by Rothschild was historically important for another reason: It showed how ‘fabricating‘ a disaster could lead to massive financial gains.’

    Now, I can’t say I’m onboard with the assertion that Nathan Rothschild multiplied his wealth by over 6000 times as a result of Napoleon’s demise, but he certainly made obscene profits from that event.

    Bottom Line: Only ONE entity has the financial wherewithal to be able to kill a U.S President in broad daylight, witnessed by thousands and get away with it (and later likewise to brother Bobby and JFK Jr).
    Only one entity has the financial and political clout to pull off 9/11, the Covid Deception (which needed that the entirety of the western world political class to be owned and controlled to have been implemented so successfully), and to get away with it seamlessly.

    And that entity is of course, the Zio-cabal – of which the Rothschilds are a foundational entity and key constituent (aided and abetted by the other old and new money Zionist family dynasties throughout the world).

    The sooner the U.S ‘Ends the Fed’ and wrests control of the other central banks the Zio-miscreants possess, the sooner the world will be one giant leap closer to bringing down this Usury Cartel of Bankers.

  22. Malla says:

    One of the most popular movie in the German Third Reich was Wunschkonzert (Request Concert) by Eduard von Borsody.It had nothign against Jews, no propaganda.
    Indeed what people do not know is that only a small number of German movies from the Third Reich was about Jew warning or war propaganda. Most were normal films with far less violence and sex than Hollywierd movies!!!
    The 1940 motion picture was seen by over 20 milllion viewers, used a blend of fiction, newsreel and documentary footage to tell the classic story of lovers separated during wartime. The Plot: A Luftwaffe pilot returning from a secret mission with the Condor Legion in the Spanish Civil War is unable to find the beloved he’d met in the 1936 Berlin Olympics. Three years later, now serving in the Luftwaffe during WWII, he sends a message to the Wünschkonzert program requesting the Olympic anthem be played for her. After hearing it, she finds him again and they are reunited.The film, produced by Ufa-Film Gbmh (Ufi), Germany’ state-production film company, was reportedly inspired by Propaganda Minister Joseph Goebbels.

    • Thanks: Arthur MacBride
    • Replies: @HeebHunter
  23. UNIT472 says:

    We need to remember that in the run up to WW2 there was no 24/7 news media as we know it today. There were newspapers, newsreels and radio but they couldn’t create a political ‘narrative’ of the sort we are subjected to today because they were not a monolithic monopoly. The only thing that was close to what we have today were the Hollywood movie studios and they went to war ( against Germany) long before the USA ever did.

    The propaganda war began in November 1938 after the Krystallnacht riot in Germany. However, it was not portrayed as a George Floyd style reaction of Germans to a Polish Jew ( Herschel Grynzspan) murdering the German diplomat Ernst Vom Rath in Paris. In fact almost no one in America even realized that had happened first. Instead Krystallnacht was said to be an orchestrated attack by the Nazi government on German Jews but just like the American police did last year during the Summer of Floyd the German authorities just stood down and let the mobs have their fun. They didn’t instigate the attacks.

    Hollywood unleashed a barrage of anti German propaganda films after that and they had a sizable proportion of the German/Jewish film industry emigre community to assist them. It is interesting that Goebbels, who was not unaware of the power of movie propaganda, made no attempt to either buy of form a pro German film studio in the US to counter the Jewish American film studios. Imagine a Goebbels financed film portraying Herschel Grynzspan as a Derrick Chauvinesque Zionist Jewish fanatic trying to plunge Europe into another World War to counter all the “I married a Nazi’ rubbish Hollywood was creating to get America to go to war.

    • Replies: @Curmudgeon
  24. Malla says:

    History is always written by the winning side. This was never more true than in the case of Third Reich Germany. Everything we know about it, or everything we think we know, is filtered through layers of illusion and propaganda. But if you watch their movies, the illusion gets broken. The movies tell a story, the story of the Third Reich, a story that has never been told in quite this way.
    1933 — Fugitives
    A simple, mythical story, told at the beginning of the Reich. Hans Albers makes his first of three appearances in the series, as the leader who pulls his people together and leads them back home, to safety and freedom.
    The story takes place in 1928. A group of about 45 Volga Germans are trying to escape from the Soviet Union. They have made their way to the Chinese border, but there they find themselves in a war zone. There is no food, no water, no transportation; the Soviets are trying to hunt them down and kill them; some of them are sick; they are fighting among themselves. Hans Albers is an army officer attached to the German embassy. He finds an unguarded train that could be used for escape, if the track were repaired. He takes charge of the group, and together they repair the track and escape into China, and from there eventually make their way to Hamburg. The symbolism is obvious: the officer represents Hitler. Hans Albers brings to this role, as to all his roles, a unique combination of dignity and panache. When you realize that this is how the Germans saw their Führer, it puts everything in a different light.

    1936 — The Kaiser of California
    An epic story about a man who builds a new country in the wilderness of California, only to have it destroyed by the gold rush. The movie is based on an actual historical character, Johann Suter (known in America as John Sutter). He was a young printer who got in trouble when he printed radical posters. He climbed up to the top of a cathedral, contemplating suicide; but a spirit appeared to him, and showed him a vast world out there, full of opportunity. He said goodbye to his family and emigrated to America. After a desperate journey across mountains and deserts, he arrived in California, with a few followers whom he had saved from starvation. (This part is just like Fugitives.) Within a decade he transformed the area from a semi-desert to a fertile paradise with abundant farms, orchards, and ranches. His wife and two sons joined him. More and more immigrants joined his community, and he found work for all of them.

    Then one of his original followers discovered gold nuggets in the river. All of his men deserted him, abandoned their jobs, and started panning for gold. They staked claims on land that belonged to him, and defied him to do anything about it. He took his case to court and won, but there was nothing the government could do against thousands of gold prospectors. They killed his sons and burned his house. Since no one was working, his income dropped to zero, and the bankers foreclosed on his property. At the end we find him an old man with nothing. The same spirit appears again and asks him, “Why do you keep trying to fight the gold? You can’t stop the wheels of the world.”

    The parallel with Hitler is all too clear. How this movie got past the censors is not clear. A movie in which a great social experiment is defeated by the unstoppable “wheels of the world” is the last thing a propaganda minister would want the people to see. But the artistic vision is true, and Goebbels must have valued artistic truth more than propaganda. Apparently there was less censorship in Germany than we have been led to believe!!!

    1937 — The Broken Jug
    Supposed to be Hitler’s favorite movie. The story takes place in a Dogpatch-like village in rural Holland. A senior judge from the city is on a tour of the countryside to inspect the legal system. He arrives here just in time to sit in on the most absurd trial ever imagined. The judge is a drunken buffoon. The plaintiff is a woman who lives nearby, whose precious jug was broken the night before by a man who was trying to escape from her yard after being caught near her daughter’s bedroom. She says the man was Rupert, her daughter’s boyfriend. Rupert denies this, and says another man was present. As the trial goes on it becomes increasingly obvious that the real culprit is the judge himself. The senior judge finally straightens everything out, and the village judge is chased out of town. Slapstick comedy par excellence. The actors are so good that you did believed the whole thing, as if you were watching a documentary; only at the end did it finally occur that these people are actors, not idiots.

    • Thanks: Kali
    • Replies: @Malla
    , @Commentator Mike
  25. Malla says:

    1939 — Effi Briest
    Effi is a girl of 17 who is married to a middle aged man, an ambitious politician. He has little time for his young wife. Out of loneliness and boredom, she has an affair with a neighbor. Six years later, when the affair is long forgotten, her husband discovers some of their letters. He challenges the man to a duel and kills him. Effi goes back to live with her parents, and soon dies. She has been overwhelmed by events beyond her comprehension. This is the second movie in which things go terribly wrong (Kaiser of California was the first). The theme of defeat, of events spinning out of control, appears here, ominously, in 1939, just as the war begins. One can’t help thinking that the duel was unnecessary, and the message here may be that the war is also unnecessary, and the Reich is taking a fatal step that can only end in tragedy.

    1942 — The Great Love
    Paul Wentlandt, a handsome, daredevil air force pilot, goes to Berlin on 48-hour leave and sees a concert by a famous singer. Many of the men in the audience have fantasies about meeting her; he actually does it. After her performance, he pursues her to a party, and then to her home, and manages to sleep with her that same night. Then he disappears without telling her who he is or where he is going. She is distraught for three weeks, after which he shows up again. They keep trying to get married, but each time duty calls him away at the last minute. Finally he gets shot down, and that takes him out of action long enough to have a wedding; but he will soon be back in combat.
    Like Request Concert, The Great Love was very popular at the time. Obviously these movies were intended to provide role models for the soldiers and their families. Of course 1942 was the year when events were rapidly spinning out of control beyond any hope of repair. At this point the Germans needed Alexander (and his mentor, Aristotle). Instead they got Captain Paul Wentlandt, ace fighter pilot and man about tow

    1943 — Paracelsus
    Paracelsus is presented here as a renaissance doctor who is trying to introduce scientific medicine, against the opposition of the medieval medical establishment. There is an ongoing contest to see who can cure more patients, who can control the university medical school, and who can gain the confidence of the government. Paracelsus cures the patients but loses the political struggle, and leaves town to avoid arrest. Paracelsus, like Johann Suter, appears to be up against unstoppable forces. When you quarantine a town, you cut off trade, and the merchants go out of business; they won’t put up with this for very long. When you introduce new ideas, the established professors stand to lose their students, their income, and their power; they will fight you to the last drop of blood. Gold always wins… apparently. You can’t stop the wheels of the world… but at the end, Paracelsus is still fighting. He has moved his practice to another town. Word comes that the King wants him to be the court physician. “No,” he says, “I will serve the people, not the King.”

    • Replies: @Malla
  26. Thank you for an interesting review, Travis LeBlanc.

    I have had mostly indifference to the so-called “art” of Hollywood; more often antipathy, viewing it not just as trash but malevolent trash.

    But given its mass escapist appeal and obvious mind-control role (which John and Jane Doe pay for like tv and “newspapers” …), this series is interesting history.
    Interesting to me at least as one who knew next to nothing abt Hollywood b/c of indifference and/or distain. This historical analysis might even be expanded …

  27. Schuetze says:

    “Trump wanted to lose, nothing was stolen”

    I wrote about Pikachu’s explanation, and she was drawing parallels to USA today and what happened in Communist revolutions in history.. I think Trump is a Masonic puppet. He played his part, and by all appearances his part is not over yet. The Democrat party are the ones who have been selected to implement the Communist take over, the Republicans if nothing else are too stupid to pull it off.

    “They will never let german people starve again”

    I disagree, I think the good Germans died fighting the Commusts, in the various slave labor camps and the Rhine Meadows Camps after WWII. Today Germans are self centered and cucked. They would rather save “Planet Gaia”

    “They already have total power”

    Pikachu explains in the podcast that, from her view, the Han Chinese have been selected to become the plantation foremen for the Hebrew. The Han have had their independent spirit bred out of them by thousands of years of Confucian rule. Pikachu says that “all the poppies that rose above the others were cut down” for a thousand years. Pikachu claims that only Europeans have the characteristics of independent thought and spirit required to challenge Jewish Power. She says this is why they came up with the Kalergi plan 100 years ago.

    The podcast is well worth the listen, she has a great knowledge of history.

    • Thanks: CauCasiAnn
    • Replies: @Kali
    , @Francis Miville
  28. @Malla

    You expect the negro-sickxons and the amerimutts to know about this? They want to perpetuate the Holohoax mythos, even when their souls have been sent straight to hell.

    • LOL: Malla
  29. Malla says:

    Let this sink in, out of a thousand movies made in Third Reich National Socialist Germany, only three were anti-Jewish/ warnings about Jews!!!. Just three out of nearly a thousand!!!
    Third Reich movies were amazing, not so much for what is in them as for what is not in them. There are no Jewish capitalists here, no Jewish bolsheviks, no degenerate Jewish artists or journalists, no Jewish villains of any kind in those majority of Third Reich movies. That whole issue just doesn’t come up. In “normal” Third Reich movies, only one character who appears to be Jewish: in The Great Love, the singer is accompanied by a pianist/composer named Alexander Rudinsky, who is in love with her. And even he is a decent man, not a villain at all.
    In Third Reich movies the stereotypical “fascist” personality does not appear here. The only puritan in their movies is Astreé’s aunt in La Habanera, and she is no fascist, she’s just a prudish old lady. Even the King in The Old and the Young King is usually an affable man who likes his beer. Some characters are unpleasantly authoritarian, such as Charlie’s boss and Paul Wentlandt’s commanding officer, but they are not the heroes of their respective stories.
    There are no Nietzschean “Blond Beasts” in their movies. There are seven characters who could be considered heroic: Hans Albers in Fugitives, Lieutenant Latte, Johann Suter, Paul Wentlandt, Paracelsus, Maria, and Baron Münchhausen. None of them has anything to do with Nietzsche’s “will to power” philosophy. All of the characters except one are drawn to human scale. The only exception is Baron Münchhausen, who is larger than life — but he doesn’t dominate the world, he plays with it, like a man playing with his grandchildren.
    There was very little violence in Third Reich German movies, and it was never graphic. There was nothing like Rambo or the Friday the 13th series, not to mention Ilsa, She-Wolf of the SS. The idea of “romantic violence” would seem absolutely bizarre to the characters in their films, and presumably to the audiences who watched them. What little violence there was comes from the villains, not the heroes. In fact, for someone who is used to Hollywierd MK Ultra mind control movies, the lack of violence makes Third Reich German cinema a little boring. You would feel like there should be more action. Paul Wentlandt is the closest thing to a macho man. He is a big guy, and he certainly doesn’t need a course in assertiveness training. He looks like he could take care of himself, but we never find out, because there are no fights in The Great Love. Wentlandt is a civilized man — not rude, not rough, not a rapist, not a berserker. He is a charming, sophisticated fellow who almost reminds you of the man in the Taster’s Choice commercials. If he found himself drinking coffee with that man and his lady friend, he would not feel out of place. He might be more comfortable drinking coffee with them than drinking whisky with John Wayne. Apart from Wentlandt, and perhaps Hans Albers in Fugitives, the other characters don’t even come close to being macho. These men are gentlemen. They don’t get in fistfights. They fight each other in formal duels, if they fight at all.

    • Replies: @Malla
  30. Wouldn’t it be hilarious if prince Harry peppered hid new book with quotes from Dr Goebbels.

  31. HdC says:
    @Robert Dolan

    According to a published book “Hitler’s Jewish Soldiers” there were 150,000 Jewish soldiers in the German armed forces, with ranks as high as general.

    In the 1930’s there were 550,000 Jews in Germany of which 250,000 to 300,000 emigrated to greener pastures.

    That leaves 250,000 to 300,000 Jews in Germany. Less 150,000 soldiers leaves 100,000to 150,000 civilians, or 1 civilian per soldier, average.

    I don’t see much, if any, racial discrimination here.

    IIRC it was NSDAP policy that anyone could be German if they chose to live in Germany and BEHAVED IN A MANNER COMPLIANT WITH GERMAN NORMS AND THE AUTHORITIES.

    The ones that wound up in concentration camps did not meet the foregoing requirements and acted against the interests of the German nation.

  32. anonymous[402] • Disclaimer says:

    Trump wanted to lose, nothing was stolen

    The election was obviously stolen and Trump won in a landslide. Nonetheless, his pusillanimous behavior after the election was stolen from him remains so out of character that he and his family may have been threatened with assassination. I’ll give DJT the benefit of the doubt even though he turned the government over to the Jews as was foreordained under the puppet-in-chief Biden’s regime.

    In DJT’s defense, the flagrant traitor Milley apparently told the President of the United States to stand down during the leftist assault on the White House or he’d be taken down. Schumer publicly threatened Trump that the intelligence agencies could get back at him “six ways from Sunday,” which left unmodified was a clear threat by the Jews and their deep state goons that if the President didn’t stand down, the Trump family might suffer the same fate as the Kennedys did. Even Bill Clinton, when asked what it was like having so much power, quipped that he wasn’t allowed to make a single decision without the Jews’ approval, which could only have been enforced by the Jews’ goons in the intelligence community who could get back at him “six ways from Sunday.”

  33. Travis Le Blanc?? Who wrote this interesting piece? And where is the author coming from? Googling the name produces an earnest Yale Law graduate but I don’t think that is the author? Am I wrong? More information about provenance please.

    • Replies: @gay troll
  34. Schuetze says:

    Yes, but the would never admit that it was because of tax evasion. Here is an infamous case where past taxes and bribes were rewritten by Jewish Victors History, in this case paying back taxes are called “ransom”:

    Baron Louis De Rothschild Dead: Paid \$21,000,000 Ransom to Nazis

    If the Nazi’s hated Jews as much as Jews would have us believe, why didn’t they just execute “Baron” Louis and confiscate his property?

    While looking for an article concerting Louis Rothschild, I stumbled across this beauty that fits in with the subject of this article and substantiates typical Rothschild, and typical Jewish, tax evasion:

    “In 1820, Metternich entered into negotiations with the House of Rothschild for a large loan that was to take the form of a lottery. The complicated arrangements for this enormous loan demanded the presence of a Rothschild in Vienna and thus Salomon Mayer (1774-1855), who had been handling Rothschild affairs with Austria, moved to the city and established a bank there. Mercantile trade in the shipment and distribution of commodities, such as cotton, sugar and tobacco from the Americas, generated a sizeable proportion of the Rothschilds’ annual profits. In 1844 S M von Rothschild won a contract to import cigars from Havana for free delivery in Vienna. About 17 million cigars were imported, which increased Salomon’s popularity, since the Viennese had been denied access to genuine Havana cigars by import restrictions imposed by a State tobacco monopoly.”

    Loan in the form of “Lottery”. Nothing to see here, just like with Hunter Bidens \$500,000 “paintings”.

    Of course “import cigars from Havana for free delivery” means that the Rothschilds were allowed to avoid the paying tariffs on these cigars. Tariff’s in that period were a critical source of tax revenue for the state, so the Rothschilds were using their immense Jewish Power to avoid paying taxes.

    • Replies: @anon
    , @Curmudgeon
    , @beavertales
  35. @Alexander Turok

    “They Live” is one of my favorite Sci-Fi movies and I bought the movie a long time ago. I suggest this movie to many people but few want to watch it as it has ugly aliens and adult content(the last scene with the topless female) and is not suitable for children.

    Your take is interesting and I suppose the movie could be interpreted on a few levels according to each person’s view of the world.

    I let each person decide what to make of the movie’s allegorical meaning but my meaning is that it is a somewhat disguised interpretation of our Jewish overlords and their power over us. This is based on my experience of this world and of course each person’s experience is different. For example consider Affirmative Action; If you are a White person living in a 90% or greater White community then you will not be affected by Affirmative action but if you live in an area where black people at at minimum are 20% or greater population you as a White will be affected by A F.

    There was new selective enrollment school built where enrollment would be determined by test scores and grades. However the school board was shocked that White children would be 75% of the school population when White children are only 8% of the city public school population. So they instantly made new laws that capped White students at 35%. Do you understand now why White people run as far away as possible. If you live in a White area then then of course your experience/world is different. But sooner or later you as a White person will move out to the larger world will experience different reality.

    • Replies: @Bardon Kaldian
  36. @Trinity

    ‘Tucker, like all (((conservatives on television))) also worships at the MLK shrine of puke.

    Tucker won’t even say the word “jew” much less go after them”

    You know very well that if he even mention those two groups in any disparaging or negative way he won’t have a job anymore and will be forced to eke out a living like the rest of us.

    • Replies: @Trinity
  37. The National Council of Jewish Women even previewed the film, giving it their thumbs up.


    As for The House of Rothschild, the Nazis loved it. They would later use footage from The House of Rothschild in their antisemitic magnum opus Der ewige Jude.


    Finally something we all can get around and hold hands and sing Kum Ba Ya.

    I saw this in the Gilad Atzmon panel from a couple days ago (terrific video which somebody should transcribe because it is long) and found it on youtube and watched the first 20 minutes or so until my attention span snapped. So I know it was not a pot roast.

    It was being flamed. I only mention this to show I was paying attention. Anyway that still of Karloff looks great and if any kind soul could post the time stamp to Karloff’s lines which impressed the author of this fine essay I would appreciate that.

  38. Malla says:

    By modern standards, most Third Reich films would all be rated G or PG. There is only one bare breast (in Paracelsus). There is a skinny-dipping scene in the movie The Great Sacrifice, but the girl stays under water. In this respect NS films are exactly like American films of the 1930’s and 40’s — sex is treated very discreetly. There is no nudity in Gone with the Wind, either, even though Rhett Butler spends a lot of time in Belle Watling’s establishment. No racial consciousness, no violence, no übermenschen.. in NS German films. To anyone used to Hollywood, the most amazing thing of all is the lack of police in Third Reich movies. Hollywood produces one cop show after another. It would be hard to put together a series of 18 Hollywood movies (not to mention TV shows) spanning a 13 year period without including some cop shows. But there are almost no police investigations in these NS movies. There are occasions when the characters get in trouble with the king or the mayor, but the police as an independent institutional force just barely exist in this universe. The characters have affairs, fight duels, and generally do whatever they want without thinking about the police. There is a trial at the end of Closing Chord. That’s almost the only time the police appear. One would have thought that the NS Germans would be obsessed with law and order, even more than Americans. One would have thought there would be story after story about heroic Gestapo agents ferreting out enemies of the state — Dirty Klaus instead of Dirty Harry. But if these movies are any indication, law and order as we understand it was a matter of little interest to the Germans in the Third Reich.There is one movie about law enforcement — The Broken Jug — and the authorities get no respect at all. I say “authorities” because there are no police as such in this village. There is no one with a uniform or a badge. In any case, The Broken Jug is a joke, and the local magistrate is the butt of the joke — it’s like a Keystone Kops movie — and this was Hitler’s favorite movie!!

    We are supposed to believe that these movies are illusions, but Hollywood movies are not illusions, the history books written by Allied historians are not illusions, and the postwar Nazi stereotypes are not illusions. This is all nonsense. These movies are a window into Third Reich Germany as the Germans themselves experienced it. They give us a rare opportunity to see beyond the stereotypes and get a look at life is it was lived at that time.The Nazi Germany of our imagination via decades of propaganda has very little to do with the Third Reich Germany that actually existed. If the Germans of that time were who we were told they were, they wouldn’t have watched movies like Request Concert or The Broken Jug, not to mention The Great Sacrifice. Today, we think of Third Germany as a police state, but that wasn’t the experience of most people in the Third Reich at the time, unlike the USSR. They would be amazed and dismayed that we remember the Gestapo, and forget everything else.

    Fifty years from now, late 20th century America may be remembered, like NS Germany, as a police state, a country responsible for war crimes. There will be monuments to the six million innocent people who were sent to prison and had their homes confiscated for growing pot. Cool World will be as forgotten as Amphitryon, and 2001: A Space Odyssey as forgotten as Kaiser of California. Posterity will remember nothing about America except Darryl Gates.

  39. Mefobills says:

    they gained complete control of worldwide banking through the BIS which they created in order to collect the reparations the Jewish lawyers at Versailles imposed on the Germans.

    The above is more complicated. It requires more nuance.

    Schact was involved with BIS, and why? Because he had observed the hyperinflation, understood the root cause, and came up with and then implemented the plan to bring the hyperinflation to heel.

    It was re-establishment of Chancellorship control over the Deutchbank/Reichsbank, the issuance of Rentenmarks, and then slamming heads of internati0nal short sellers against the wall. Schacht also denied private bankers covering loans and other things that the Central Bank provides, when the private bankers did not follow his (Schacht’s) guidance.

    The (((international))) short sellers betting against the mark creates a mechanism where new marks are hypothecated into existence. The new marks are backed up by dollars, gold, pounds, francs -anything but German currency. When the short seller exits his position by betting against the mark, he makes “money” by paying back the loan with his marks and pockets the “extra.” All of the new marks created by the shorting mechanism were hypothecated at private banks, not the central bank.

    Schacht was attempting an “international” agreement through the BIS to put a stop to the “root cause” and to allow Germany to export goods, to then acquire dollars, to then pay the Versailles debts. I can speculate that part of the agreement was to jubilee and restructure debt service. There were many people aware that Germany could not pay the debts as currently structured, and that included Schacht.

    Ultimately, the cause of the hyperinflation was a three way flow, where Germany had to acquire dollars/gold/francs/pounds to then pay the Allies (England and France), who then had to pay U.S. Treasury.

    The Treasury after WW1 did not release France and England from war loan Debts, but instead demanded payment, while at the same time the U.S. did not allow Germany to export goods to acquire dollars.

    This triangular flow of debt payments squeezed Germany, and the short sellers sniffed out the weakness.

    And yes, as you can imagine, many of the Bear Raiding short sellers were Jews, especially American Jews from New York (wall street). During the hyperinflation, many German Jews, through ethnic nepotism, were allowed international dollar loans, to buy up Germany. Some estimate that as much as 1/3 of Germany was bought up Jews during the interwar years.

    So, the BIS was intended to help Germany and ethnic Germans, and it probably would have worked out ok had Schacht not been fired by Hitler in 1938. Hitler wasn’t as monetarily astute as many attribute to him. Hitler’s instincts were to follow Reinhard and before him Federer. Ultimately, Schacht was a German patriot who understood how to maneuver the “Jewish” invented debt money private banking system.

    I’m a full on NSDAP admirer, and it is important for any future national socialist to get a handle on this period, so that mistakes in future can be avoided.

    When wars go hot, that is only the tip of the Iceberg. The majority of the actions happened below the surface, long before the war breaks out into open hostilities.

    The BIS has morphed beyond its original intent, and is now the center to coordinate “corporate” private banking systems.

    Germany was violently provoked through two world wars, and was maneuvered and screwed to the wall by Finance International, and then much of her population was dispossessed, while real German wealth was bought up by a hostile minority at pennies on the dollar.

  40. anon[102] • Disclaimer says:

    having to pay back taxes is anti-semetic

    thanks for link on the tax evader

  41. @Truth Vigilante

    Agree but as reluctantly so as the most stubborn of mules.

  42. gay troll says:
    @Wizard of Oz

    A freshly minted pseudonym. “Travis Le Blanc” means, of course, “White Gatekeeper” (or toll collector).

    • Thanks: Wizard of Oz
  43. @Malla

    The copy and paste artist using up bandwidth, yet again. Why not just give us a link to the source you don’t quote and then who wants to read it can do so in their own time?

    • Replies: @Malla
  44. Koserte says:

    I had to laugh, because you reminded me what pretentious pricks Jews are.

    “I’m proud to belong to the race that gave Europe its religion and its moral law — much of its science, too — much of its genius, in art, literature, and music.”

    yeah… the “chosen people” strike again

  45. Trinity says:

    I am guessing that Tucker has more money than most of us posting on this site will ever obtain. Just did a few searches on his net worth and it is listed at 30 million. Carlson is no Roger Staubach, the former Dallas Cowboy and the “Captain America” of football went on to earn quite a bit in the bidness world. Staubach’s net worth is listed at 600 million. Wow, so much for the dumb jock myth. While Carlson is not rolling in 600 million, 30 million is more than enough to live the rest of your life, especially someone at 50 something years of age, what does he have a couple of kids maybe, a wife? He can’t make it on 30 million? How much money do you really need? At 50 something or older, one should think more about what kind of life they have led and what their purpose on earth was really about. Carlson could do a show and drop the J-bomb and the real troof about MLK and ride off into the sunset a contented man. Of course, who is to say that Fox wouldn’t experience technical difficulties the second TC drops a dime on the JQ and MLK. I am assuming the show is live?

    And WHO KNOWS, maybe IF Fox couldn’t stop an unhinged Carlson in time from dropping some gospel on the JQ and MLK LIES, Carlson might become as legendary as Paul Revere. Does anyone with 30 million really have to worry about paying the light bill or where there next meal is coming from? I mean we are still SUPPOSED to have FREE SPEECH in America, so Carlson would not be facing jail time for going buck wild or would he?

    This is why I know Trump is full of shit. After they stole the election and he had nothing to lose, I would have been dropping some truth bombs left and right before I was ushered out of the White House. Trump is 70 something, and is in his winter years, go out with a bang.

  46. Schuetze says:

    I have read all kinds of things about Schacht. He was certainly a good friend of Montague Norman and he was certainly a Freemason, and it is extremely telling that BIS survived the war and ended up in control of the entire planet’s central banking.

    Somewhere I read the story that as Eisenhower approached the Sigfried line in late 1944, he came upon the brilliant idea of pulling an American version of the Schlieffen plan. Eisenhower wanted to bypass all the German fortifications in Alsace and simply steamroll through Basel and then into Germany. BIS has always been located on a piece of its own internationally sovereign property in Basel. The Swiss had implemented their Reduit strategy where the front lines were lightly defended and the real defense of Switzerland began in the Alps. It would have been a cakewalk.

    The BIS, and the BIS owners, informed Eisenhower that no such thing was going to happen. Consequently the Americans had to fight their way through Alsace and across the Rhine. Who knows how many US soldiers died so that Rothschild control of BIS would remain intact after the war.

    Here is an interesting article about BIS that also discusses Schacht’s role in its founding.

    Rothschild: The Hidden Sovereign Power Behind BIS

  47. Koserte says:
    @Robert Dolan

    Christendoms fate was sealed during the first world war when the churches in Germany France and Britain were telling their young men that this was the war against tyranny and it must be fought.
    The church in Europe never recovered from that.

  48. It seems that the handful of people who are obsessed with hating Jews and the similarly few Jews who are obsessed with being hated, will watch a film and see it in a mirror image.

    To the 99% of people who make up the rest, this film sounds like an interesting, if sensationalised, account of a remarkable family, delivered by a Hollywood that didn’t think much about Jews per se, nor about the Nazis who hated them from the other side of the world.

  49. Gordo says:

    I did hear that Hjalmar Schacht was quite close to the Bank of England, in fact did their bidding, in fact was a long term BoE agent, which was why the British arranged his acquital at Nuremburg.

    • Replies: @Mefobills
  50. Schuetze says:

    Here is an interesting video mostly about Schacht:

    At Nuremberg, Schacht supposedly declared “they don’t hang bankers“. Schacht was declared innocent by his masonic brother Robert H. Jackson.

    • Replies: @Mefobills
  51. E_Perez says:

    “Jud Suess” is is an excellent film. As “Die Rothschilds” it is based on real events.

    In some respect it is more interesting than “Die Rothschilds” – whose historical background (the Napoleonic wars) is well known anyway – because “Jud Suess” shows how our leaders are corrupted by Jewish money in return for favors used against the population.

    A visionary allegorical scene is when Jud Suess obtains from the Duke the right to open the well guarded walls of Stuttgart and immediately the city is invaded by foreigners.

    As the film draws to a close, a citizen of Württemberg, observing the Jews leave, comments, “May the citizens of other states never forget this lesson.”

    To no avail, citizen: they forgot!
    And they even accepted that the warning is censored.

  52. Malla says:
    @Commentator Mike

    I did not have the source. It was on a text file on my hard drive from back in 2008, maybe given to me by my cousin sister. But thanks for the source anyways.

    • Replies: @ivan
  53. Mike Tre says:
    @Jack McArthur

    “The Nazis made a big mistake on taking on Jewish racism by adopting another form of racism.”

    This is an absurd misunderstanding of history. Shed your blank slate zealotry, and perhaps some understanding of the world will come to you.

    • Replies: @Jack McArthur
  54. @Triteleia Laxa

    Indeed the difficulty that the ADL had with suppressing it prompts a number of speculative inferences. While there was active Jewish organisation in the US from about 1930 onwards based on well founded fear of the Nazis it is notable that it not only failed to have much influence on anything, even on letting refugees into the US, it shouldn’t be forgotten that someone as well informed as Frankfurter simply couldn’t believe the atrocity story brought to the Allies by escaped Poles. I daresay quite a lot of well informed American Jews would have known how much German Jewry in the 1930s was able to assist, with money and people, the growth and prosperity of the Jewish community in Palestine. That must have made it very difficult to recognise moves toward a Final Solution from about January 1942.

    • Replies: @UNIT472
    , @europeasant
  55. @Mefobills

    Has China got a national socialist government? How would you compare it to Hitler’s 1930s Germany? Will the march into Austria [so to speak] be welcomed?

    • Replies: @Mefobills
  56. DaveE says:

    “In other words, it was less important that people like Jews than that they hate Nazis.”

    Brilliant comment, once again. Thanks. And maybe, sir, you are just the guy to answer a question that’s been bugging me for a long time:

    Why does the Jewish-slang term for the NSDAP, “Nazi”, seem to share the same root as “Ashkenazi” (however it’s spelled) for European / Western Jew? An obvious “word-play” to mislead / confuse / distract? What’s the deal?

    Any etymological help greatly appreciated!

    • Replies: @Schuetze
  57. Crass says:

    Joseph Goebbels certainly was a proficient propagandist, and admired the BBC as the masters of propaganda, but there was even more sinister propagandists working around the same time.

    The Soviet Bolshevik propagandist, Ilya Ehrenberg, would be a more apt image to use in your Propaganda caption, as he was a real malevolent propagandist.

    For anyone unaware of Ilya Ehrenberg’s propaganda, they should research him.

    His hate filled propaganda was responsible for a demonic backlash on German civilians at the end of WW2 as Ehrenburg’s genocidal writings were circulated among millions of Soviet soldiers. His evil propaganda resulted in over 2 million German females been raped by the Soviet horde (German females from 8 to 80), and an orgy of murders on German civilians.

    He is infamous for inventing the Six Million alleged Jewish victims of National Socialism, on December 22, 1944. He then proceeded to introduce that figure into Bolshevik propaganda, thus inventing the Holocaust narrative, long before any so called ‘Nazi death camps’ were “Liberated” by the Bolsheviks.

    Predictably, Ilya Ehrenberg who was obviously Jewish, (like most of the Bolsheviks) arranged for the relocation of his private archives to the Yad Vashem museum in Jerusalem.

    • Replies: @Colin Wright
  58. ObserverX says:

    Thanks for sharing your knowledge. It must be such a burden to have this level of understanding of history and politics and realize it is 180 degrees from what the official narrative is.

    I also appreciate your insight into Vietnamese history leading up to, and during the Vietnam War. As a Vietnamese American whose parents lived through the war, much of what you shared corroborates with their take on it. My first experience with dissenting from an official narrative is exactly on this topic – the (official) history and narrative I learned in American high school was so counter to what my parents and community shared that it depressed me.

    • Replies: @Malla
  59. Mefobills says:

    Schacht was friends with Montague Norman.

    Schacht did try to learn Hebrew so he could better communicate with the International Jew.

    Schacht was on-board with the BIS.

    Schacht did work with Norman and the French to recall Gold to Europe during the Interwar years. The FED colluded with them (bankers collude – to no ones shock) to hold interest rates low, which was a large (probably the dominant) factor causing the Great Depression.

    All of that said, Schacht ultimately was a Patriot as he was super pissed off at what the “international” had done to Germany, especially during the hyperinflation. His actions later were against the “international,” or – he worked with them when it benefitted Germany.

    Also, Reinhardt and Schacht were the architects of NSDAP economy. At the “show trials” the Jews were so pissed off at Schacht they wanted him dead, because he had demonstrated how to beat their “finance international credit system. ” It was Hitler’s firing of Schacht in 1938 that mainly saved him from the hang-man’s noose.

    • Thanks: Schuetze
  60. lysias says:

    A horror movie based on Jewish folklore or history? Isn’t that what the 1920 Weimar silent “The Golem” is?

  61. ‘…She starts taking Lederer to Nazi rallies, and he immediately becomes a diehard Nazi. Suddenly, Joan Bennett now finds herself married to a raving Nazi fanatic…’

    Ironically, Hitler could actually have this effect on people — although it wasn’t seen as a bad thing.

    One observer reported watching some Communist workers who showed up at one of Hitler’s speeches to heckle him. They start out shouting abuse and so on — then after a bit, they’re nodding in agreement. By the end, they’re Sieg Heiling along with everyone else.

  62. UNIT472 says:
    @Wizard of Oz

    The ‘holocaust’ timeline is really interesting. Hitler in January 30th, 1939 made this comment in a speech before the Reichstag.

    “Today I want to be a prophet again. If international finance Jewry within Europe and abroad should succeed once more in plunging the peoples into a world war, then the consequence will be not the Bolshevization of the world and therewith a victory of Jewry, but on the contrary, the destruction of the Jewish race in Europe…”

    Well Germany overran Poland in September 1939 and Britain and France declared war. But there was no mass killing of Jews despite some 3 million Polish Jews now under German rule. Germany overran France and the low countries in June 1940 and still no mass killings nor any facilities to commit such mass killings. The killings only began after the invasion of the Soviet Union and then on an ad hoc basis by the 4 Einsatzgruppen attached to the German invasion forces but only against Jews in former Soviet occupied territory and those killings openly assisted by anti Soviets and local militia.

    The ‘classic’ Holocaust only began AFTER the US entered the war. Then the Wansee conference took place in January 42 and Operation Reinhard commenced but the camps were still under construction and the methods still to be worked out. Hitler obviously meant what he said in January, 1939 but the order to carry it out was brought about by Roosevelt’s declaration of war against Germany.

    • Disagree: Schuetze
  63. Trinity says:
    @Bardon Kaldian

    You don’t even need shades now, the anti-White hatred and the agenda of destroying White nations is all out in the open now and the jew isn’t bashful about it. I could even give a normie a break when this movie came out in 1988. This was the years of ACTOR Ronnie Reagan The Patron Saint Of Cuckservatism after all. Everyone knew that muh Jews had suffered so much, especially at the hands of those evil Notsees, and Israel were our greatest ally of all time because Ronnie & Company told us so. (((Alex Jones))) would have probably convinced the normies that the A-rabs were controlling America back then.

    Anyone in the year 2021 who isn’t aware of who is pushing the destruction of the West aka White civilization is beyond blind, dumb and stupid and either by sheer stupidity, willful ignorance or outright cowardice is never ever going to see the light. Ray Charles, Stevie Wonder, Helen Keller, Jose Feliciano, Ronnie Milsap, could see the jewish leading role in the destruction of White nations now. But then again, people believe in the (((virus))) death stats.

    Cue: Smoky Mountain Rain by Ronnie Milsap

  64. @Crass

    ‘…He is infamous for inventing the Six Million alleged Jewish victims of National Socialism, on December 22, 1944. He then proceeded to introduce that figure into Bolshevik propaganda, thus inventing the Holocaust narrative, long before any so called ‘Nazi death camps’ were “Liberated” by the Bolsheviks…’

    You’re not convincing anyone of the accuracy of your claims. So Ehrenburg invented the six million on December 22, 1944. According to you, that was before any of what you would call the alleged Nazi death camps were ‘liberated’.

    You just said that. This is not a point that can be disputed.

    The Red Army occupied the site of Majdanek on July 24th, 1944. Treblinka was occupied on August 16th, 1944. The sites of both Belzec and Sobibor would also have been occupied by the Red Army long before December 22, 1944.

    In principle, it may be that the Holocaust is an invention. However, you’re hardly giving anyone reason to think it is.

    • Replies: @Robjil
  65. Schuetze says:

    From Protocoll 15:

    “Under our influence the execution of the laws of the goyim
    has been reduced to a minimum. The prestige of the law has been
    exploded by the liberal interpretations introduced into this
    sphere. In the most important and fundamental affairs and
    questions judges decide as we dictate to them, see matters in the
    light wherewith we enfold them for the administration of the
    goyim, of course, through persons who are our tools though we do
    not appear to have anything in common with them — by newspaper
    opinion or by other means. Even senators and the higher
    administration accept our counsels. The purely brute mind of the
    goyim is incapable of use for analysis and observation, and still
    more for the foreseeing whither a certain manner of setting a
    question may tend.”

    The Judaic corruption of our legal systems has been going on for centuries. Back in the days of the Holy Roman Empire, where god fearing farmers and tradesmen confessed to their priests, there was no need to the kind of legal complexity we have to deal with today. Perhaps that movie, The Broken Jug, harkens back to those days where a legal system was based on right and wrong and not upon layer after layer of Talmudic deception.

    I have in the past few years been the victim of a corrupted legal system unable to concern itself with right an wrong, and obsessed with an incredibly complicated spiders web of contradictory laws open to interpretation by talmudically trained lawyers eager to contradict and overrule each other. Hate Speech, Racism, CRT, Holocaust Denial and many, many more layers of Judaic perversions of word interpretations is what legal systems have become across the entire planet.

    As if that wasn’t bad enough, we now have judges and prosecutors who have taken the clot-shot and now suffer from micro-clots in their brains. Justice has become a victim of hyper judaicism along with European Civilization.

    • Replies: @Malla
    , @anonymous
  66. Schuetze says:

    I really can’t tell you. There have been many discussions about the term “Nazi” here at UR. I tend to avoid partaking. Even Ron Unz has weighed in, more than once.

    If I was a follower of Kabbalism I would probably be able to tell you about Gematria of the term “NAZI”, but I couldn’t care less. All I know is that Nazi is a pejorative of the same magnitude as kike, yid or nigger, and that if the same rules applied to its usage as those others only true German patriots would be allowed to use it without being “cancelled”. That is why I try to use NSDAP in its stead.

  67. @Triteleia Laxa

    ‘…To the 99% of people who make up the rest, this film sounds like an interesting, if sensationalised, account of a remarkable family, delivered by a Hollywood that didn’t think much about Jews per se, nor about the Nazis who hated them from the other side of the world.’

    I’d say that’s a bridge too far, so to speak. Hollywood was very Jewish, and I find it implausible that they didn’t think about the fact. That they didn’t proceed to shout about it hardly demonstrates they weren’t conscious of it.

    If I rob banks for a living — but don’t post accounts of my adventures on the internet — would you say it must follow that I don’t think about it? Perhaps I merely think it inadvisable to publicize the fact.

    That the Jews of Hollywood weren’t strident about their ethnicity could demonstrate they simply didn’t think about it — or it could merely demonstrate that they thought it wouldn’t be particularly useful to advertise the fact.

    I’ll go with the latter. Jews seem to spend a lot of time agonizing about being Jews. It’s practically a hobby with them. So the Jews of Hollywood thought about being Jews — and I imagine they thought about Hitler.

    • Replies: @Triteleia Laxa
  68. Kali says:

    The podcast is well worth the listen, she has a great knowledge of history.

    Sounds interesting. I’ve opened in another tab. – I may just give it a listen if the oppotunity presents itself (which it just may well do this week (que sigh of relief as a seeminly endless streem of house-guests looks to be coming to an end… Ahhhh, blessed peace! 🙂 )).

    Anyway, thanks for the link and the overview, Schueltze.

    Best wishes,

    • Replies: @Schuetze
  69. Mefobills says:

    There is a difference between Mason’s and FreeMasons. I’m not sure of today’s status, but in the beginning, there was a clear delineation.

    Mason’s were a guild of “builders” who saw order in the universe, and wanted to be in alignment with God’s design. Basically, they were seeking out the logos. Many Masons were Deists, not Jews. They were architects and builders.

    Free Mason antecedents run back through time to Jacob Frank and Sabatai Sevi. The Frankists basically infiltrated the Masonic lodges.

    The founding fathers of the U.S. had barely anytime to figure out finance capitalism and free-masonary, as the movements happened almost simultaneously.

    Finance Capitalism got its start with BOE in 1694. Sevi was declared the Jewish Messiah in 1666, and Frankism got its start in the “Oriental Lodges” somewhere around mid 1750’s.

    George Washington wrote about it:

    In 1799, when German minister G.W. Snyder warned George Washington of the Illuminati plan “to overthrow all governments and religion”, Washington replied that he had heard “much of the nefarious and dangerous plan and doctrines of the Illuminati“. He however concluded his letter by stating: “I believe notwithstanding, that none of the Lodges in this country are contaminated with the principles ascribed to the society of Illuminati“.

    In another letter to Snyder, written a month later, Washington continued on the topic:


    “It was not my intention to doubt that, the Doctrines of the Illuminati, and principles of Jacobinism had not spread in the United States. On the contrary, no one is more truly satisfied of this fact than I am.

    The idea that I meant to convey, was, that I did not believe that the Lodges of Free Masons in this Country had, as Societies, endeavoured to propagate the diabolical tenets of the first, or pernicious principles of the latter (if they are susceptible of separation).

    That Individuals of them may have done it, or that the founder, or instrument employed to found, the Democratic Societies in the United States, may have had these objects; and actually had a separation of the People from their Government in view, is too evident to be questioned.”

    There are always in-groups forming in the population that do not have the “general-welfare” in mind, but instead are acting to benefit their in-group.

    Schacht’s actions were not to benefit a secret in-group, but were for the General Welfare. His family was “free” farmers who lived in the Ditsmarschen area between the Elbe and Eider rivers. Schacht did his doctorate on English Mercantilists and demonstrated how they were aware of money quantity theory from the 1500 to 1600s.

    Schacht’s namesake was Horace Greely, a naturalized American Citizen, who was a populist newspaper editor in the mid 1870’s. Schacht’s full name was Hjalmar Horace Greely Schacht.

    The William Morgan affair was in 1826, and exposed how the Masonic lodges had been infiltrated. John Quincy Adams (former Mason) worked with Horace Greely to castigate the Masons.

    It’s highly doubtful that Hitler and Schacht were Freemasons. Everything they did was against secret societies like Freemasons and finance international.

    The “money” is the mainspring of history, and historians who are monetarily illiterate make many fundamental mistakes.

    NSDAP economy is demonized by association – Hitler was a Freemason and working with the Illuminati, etc. This sort of demonization helps close the minds of the Goyim, so they stop investigating Hitler and NSDAP history.

    Hitler worked with the Zionists for Havarra, as it was to expel Jews – a divorce so to speak, where Jews were separated from Germans, so they could no longer do harm. Havarra began in 1933, and Schacht was made Chancellor of the Reichsbank in August of 1934. No doubt, Schacht helped supervise transfer payments from the Reich to the Anglo-Palestine bank in Jaffa.

  70. @Colin Wright

    Aren’t you the type of individual who would watch this film and draw all of the lessons which the film reviewer said the “red-pilled JQ” person would?

    It seems to me that your perception of the “Jews of Hollywood” is refracted through a similar perception.

    When you only ever see “red”, but everyone else sees a lot of different colours, maybe that’s because you’re wearing red-tinted glasses?

    • Troll: Colin Wright
    • Replies: @The Plutonium Kid
    , @Mehen
  71. @Trinity

    ‘ (((Alex Jones))) would have probably convinced the normies that the A-rabs were controlling America back then.’

    People still believe nonsense like that — at least, they did until recently. I recall listening to two people talking in 2016 about how Hillary Clinton was a puppet of her Arab advisor. This was after her email explaining that we had to promote civil war in Syria because Israel wished it had been published.

    • Replies: @JimDandy
  72. Mefobills says:
    @Wizard of Oz

    Has China got a national socialist government? How would you compare it to Hitler’s 1930s Germany? Will the march into Austria [so to speak] be welcomed?

    China has a communist government, which operates a mixed national socialist economy. Ron Unz got involved in one comment thread, as many Chinese commentators were all butt-hurt about my comparison of China with Fascism.

    In general, the average NPC (non player charcter) walking around has been programmed with a false view of what Fascism is.

    Industrial Capitalism was invented in the Colonies, and transmitted to other Nations, especially after the American Civil war.

    Industrial Capitalism is characterized by State Credit (not private bank credit) channeling into industry. The beginning of the U.S. was in a revolutionary war against Finance Capital as it emanated from London.

    Franklin intended on the U.S. to have a State Bank, modeled on his bank in the Philadelphia Colony.

    The whole bank affair during Colonial period to First Bank is book-length, but the intent of the founders was industrial capitalism, and general welfare.

    China’s economy is not something Chinese invented, they copied the American System of the founders, and copied later manifestations in Germany developed under the Kaiser, and under Hitler who resurrected it to then revive Germany.

    China’s economy is not a duplicate of NSDAP, or Fascist Italy, but it has so many things in common that I conclude China is Fascist, or National Socialist. NOT COMMUNIST. China has a communist government, but a national socialist economic system. China does not have a communist demand economy.

    • Agree: Arthur MacBride
    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
    , @Vaterland
  73. NYers hate us and chant BLM

    They deserve this:

  74. @UNIT472

    There was a reason the German authorities stood down. It wasn’t as widespread as portrayed.

  75. Schuetze says:

    I don’t want to get into a big argument about Schacht, but there is lots of evidence that he was a freemason. I will agree with you that many of his actions can be considered proof that he was a German patriot. I will also agree that it is possible that as BIS was being set up, its ultimate nefarious purpose was not yet clear, just as George Washington and John Adams did not necessarily agree or participate in the illuminati control of the American Freemason lodges. I will quite honestly admit that I don’t have the evidence to prove either way what each of the US “founding fathers” were up to.

    I would say that evidence is pretty strong the Franklin and Hamilton were illuminati/Rothschild corrupted.

    Hitler is a fascinating case. Was he controlled opposition? I can’t say for certain either way. Many people whose opinions I respect are certain he was a patsy, and many whose opinion I respect are convinced he was sincere. I can live with the same verdict on Schacht. I can also live with the same verdict about Robert E. Lee. BIS is another case, and events have proved this.

    • Replies: @Mefobills
  76. AReply says:

    I recommend reading this site idiomatically. It’s overt topology is in the form of a white-walled laboratory organized as a floor with a sparse arrangement of polygonal obstacles designed to be recognized and navigated by Ron’s semantic Roomba, so intellectually it’s dry here. But it’s also attended by various antiquated R2 units plus copies of Boilerplate the Victorian-era steam robot, and watching these bots amble around the obstacle course is its own enjoyment. Some of the bots can recognize a cube and push it over to another cube and dream of stacking them to climb and reach a dangling electrical conduit for a sweet recharge. But the bots that can actually climb are a newer generation in another lab. Mostly the bots just transliterate idioms in an online version of Searle’s Chinese Room thought experiment.

    These caught my eye:

    ‘Part X of my series begging no-question that movies are topical to whatever they’re about. [Insert arousing click-bait topic ((((Nazis))))]’

    ‘If only we would remember what has been forgotten’

    ‘You know if you could know what they knew the way they knew it, you might see it they way they saw it’

    ‘…And in case of Nazis, it would be MPAA rated G’

    ‘History is always written by the winning side. Except when it’s not’

    ‘Sometimes what is said is constituted by what is not said’

    ‘I read something about something, here’s an anecdote’

    ‘Mirthful rebuke of the pretentiousness of taking credit for everything’

    ‘Trump won in a landslide but death threats made him delusionally self-obsessed after the election’

    ‘When white people are nice, people die!’

    ‘Space lizards’

    The best comment so far:

    “When wars go hot, that is only the tip of the Iceberg.”

    (In the background, a more musical, vintage bot named Joe dreams of imaginary guitar notes and imaginary vocal parts written for a song about the imaginary journalistic profession…)

    ***Thank you all, for your refs to Nazi related old movies

    • Troll: Arthur MacBride
    • Replies: @Mefobills
    , @JimDandy
  77. @Schuetze

    in this case paying back taxes are called “ransom”:

    Geez, I thought it was a hollow-co\$t.

    • Replies: @Schuetze
  78. Schuetze says:

    Thanks Kali,

    I get loads of information and knowledge from podcasts while I am doing other things, especially driving. I have no problem listening to a multi hour podcast while working on various projects. I am retired now, but I used to be in IT and I would listen to podcasts over headphones while performing less demanding programming and other IT tasks. Apparently Ron Unz only reads newspapers, and his narrow overton window is often very apparent.

    For anyone who is interested, here is some of my favorite podcasts in no particular order (I refuse to support Apple or spotify):

    • Replies: @Morton's toes
  79. @Trinity

    I agree, it was indeed odd that Trump went without even a whimper. I could not understand it at the time. But in hindsight, had he dropped truth bombs….his entire empire would have been destroyed. His legacy would be gone. His children would live in fear, as the Kennedys do. He knows the topography of the ground.

    After 9/11 he immediately made the public statement that there is no way those buildings fell because of an airplane crash. Two days later he stated, well you know…the “extreme heat of the jet fuel”. Trump is owned by the Jew. His family is married to the Jew.

    Look no further than Dr. David Duke. This dude got on the wrong side of the Jews and look at him now. Reviled and hated throughout America. Smeared as a hate-filled Anti-Semite. The man could have been a great politician and statesman. All of that was denied to him due to Jewish power and influence.

    Look no further than the great David Irving – This man was a rockstar in Great Britain. He was building a media empire with his incredible work on WWII history. And now he is a broken man, hounded relentlessly by the Jew. Made fun of and smeared by the recent movie “Denial”.

    Look at the Charles Lindbergh Baby case. These fucking Jews will creep up to your house in the middle of the night, snatch your baby boy out of his crib, runoff in the nearby woods with him, and smash his little head against a tree, and then ransom money from your family for your son’s return. Later they threatened to kill the rest of his family if he ran for public office.

    Look at all the countless Historians who made the tremendous error to publish their findings regarding the Holocaust Myth. History Professors that were murdered or jumped by Jewish thugs..held down to the ground and sulfuric acid poured on their faces.

    Look no further than the great Ernst Zundel who was arrested in America and deported to Germany to stand trial for Holocaust Denial. The Jews pursued him relentlessly after he became an incredible bulwark of truth for the Holocaust Revisionist movement. Unaffraid, in the end, he died alone, seperated from his wife…illegally deported from his home in America.

    Look no further than all the Nazi War Criminals tracked down by the Jews, kidnapped from whatever country they lived in, whisked away to Israel to face a kangaroo trial and quick execution following that trial. You see, for the Holocaust Industry and the Survival of Israel…those who knew the true enemy and the true history of the National Socialist Party had to be tracked down and murdered. The Nazi High Command presented a real threat of exposure of the Jewish Lies. So for 80 years, they pursue this agenda of silencing all Nazis Officers still alive.

    There is a very real reason No Politician in America will call out the Jews. There is a very real reason no TV commentator or Movie Star ever takes a stand and calls out the Jews. Whatever happened to Jesse Ventura?

    Look no further than Charlie Sheen (of “Two and a Half Men” fame). Charlie Sheen was the highest-paid actor on TV at the time. His show had millions tuning in every week. He was an absolute rock star at the pinnacle of his career and then he got woke to 9/11 and started making comments publicly. Where is he now???

    Of course, we do not mention the Kennedy “Family Curse”. Now we know the Jews most likely assassinated our President, his brother, even his young son (30 years later) and will continue to do so to any of his family they deem a threat. “Never Forget…Never Forgive”.

    Look no further than the entire Romanov family. Ritually Murdered – Slaughtered in a basement by foul fucking murdering Jews. Their bullet riddled, still breathing bodies bayonetted after their murderers ran out of bullets.

    Look no further than the 10,000 Polish elites murdered and burried in the Katyn forrest by the communist Jews. Each with their hands tied behind their backs, their faces blind folded and then shot in the back of the head and dumped in a mass grave. This horrendous genocide blamed on Germany for 65 years.

    This is the filthy scourge of radical Jews who see all other human beings as cattle. They will absolutely “Rise and Kill First”. Each successive generation is suckled on the grotesque lies of the Jewish Holocaust…fomenting a perverted mental view of the world around them (Masada complex) and a never-ending “Enemies List”. Their ADL and SPCL become the “Eye of Modor”…always scanning the horizon for the next great threat.

    • Replies: @Trinity
  80. @Robert Dolan

    Pope Pius XI issued the encyclical “MIT BRENNENDER SORGE (ON THE CHURCH AND THE GERMAN REICH)” in March 1937

    8. Whoever exalts race, or the people, or the State, or a particular form of State, or the depositories of power, or any other fundamental value of the human community – however necessary and honorable be their function in worldly things – whoever raises these notions above their standard value and divinizes them to an idolatrous level, distorts and perverts an order of the world planned and created by God; he is far from the true faith in God and from the concept of life which that faith upholds.

    In the 3rd millennium bc Ra declares in an Ancient Egyptian text “I made all people equal”. Indeed at judgement all races are depicted coming to Re.

    Being born a Jew is not a congenital condition. Whatever genetic predispositions existing between different peoples it is the spirit which animates that rules.

  81. @Mike Tre

    What is my misunderstanding?

  82. Robjil says:
    @Colin Wright

    A co-founder of the World Zionist Organization should be given the prize. It was “wanted” to be or appeared “to have happen”. A “new religion” , a “new sun” to blind everyone to not say not one negative word about Jewish criminals at the top of our governments.


    Max Nordau, co-founder of the World Zionist Organization together with Theodore Herzl, warns of the “annihilation of six million people” at the Zionist congress in Basle, Switzerland. This was 22 years before Hitler came to power and 3 years before WW1 started.

  83. Schuetze says:

    I am one of the few people on this planet who has been “deemed to have died” by the IRS, and then forced to pay phantom capitol gains on the phantom sale of my house. I know all about the “hollow-co\$t”.

    The über rich jewess Leona Helmsley famously said “only the little people pay taxes.”. Clearly the Rothschild clan have lived generations by that credo. I might possibly be able to forgive this sin since I am a phenomenal hater of income taxes, but during the 2012 elections Lois Lehner, sister of the infamous Barbara Spectre, worked with her fellow tribesman John Koskinen to eliminate 501c chapter status from the Tea Party and Ron Paul, and thereby rigged the election for the talmudic Kenyan puppet named Barry Sotero and his tranny wife Michael.

    Jews never pay taxes, and then they force the goyim to compensate for the taxes they cheated on. It is important to note that the starvation of the Kulaks during the Holodomor was actually based on the outrageous taxes imposed by the jewish bolshevics on the Ukrainian farmers that stole every last kernal of grain that the Kulaks produced. Meanwhile, Rothschild puppets like Soros, Gates, Buffet, Bezos, Zuckerberg, Epstein, Weinstein and thousand of their fellow tribe members can easlly create tax free Zionist “foundations” to hide their ill gotten gains from the talmudic IRS.

    • Thanks: CelestiaQuesta, anarchyst
  84. @Mefobills

    The “money” is the mainspring of history, and historians who are monetarily illiterate make many fundamental mistakes.

    Michael Hudson’s publications, most importantly “…and forgive them their debts” (2018) proving that Jesus Christ called for a perpetual cycle of debt absolutions, and your comment history here exemplified by the instant set to this article, illuminate the overwhelming truth and insight of that sentence.

    • Thanks: Mefobills
  85. Here are a couple of movies soon to be released on Netflix, Apple TV, Amazon Originals and the Sheckleberg networks.

    House of Deplorables – A film by Kibbutz Partners and The Holocaust Bank – Starring Jay Z, Snoop Dog, Lil Wayne, Busta Rhymes, Lil’ Kim, LL Cool J, (All Rapper Cast as Proud Boys and Boogaloo Boys)

    I Married A White Supremacists – A Steven Spielberg film, Starring Harrison Ford, Sean Penn, Shia LaBeouf, Sacha Baron Cohen (all Jewish cast) – Synopsis – A tormented wife of a white billionaire tech wizard tries to escape her indentured servitude imprisonment by seeking asylum in Israel.

    White Terrorists – A Spike Lee Joint, starring Samual L. Jackson, Ice Cube, Danny Glover, and Rachel Dolezal as Oreo. (All Black Cast) – Synopsis – Magic Negros save the world from white domestic terrorists.

  86. Mefobills says:

    Man is a rent-seeker.

    Certain groups will band together and take rents and usury if they can get away with it.

    Jews are just better at it than others – because of evolution. Not all Jews of course, as the “tribe” was at war with itself, just as the human heart is at war with itself.

    The Line Separating Good and Evil
    Gradually it was disclosed to me that the line separating good and evil passes not through states, nor between classes, nor between political parties either — but right through every human heart — and through all human hearts. This line shifts. Inside us, it oscillates with the years. And even within hearts overwhelmed by evil, one small bridgehead of good is retained. And even in the best of all hearts, there remains … an unuprooted small corner of evil.

    Since then I have come to understand the truth of all the religions of the world: They struggle with the evil inside a human being (inside every human being). It is impossible to expel evil from the world in its entirety, but it is possible to constrict it within each person.

    Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, in ‘The Gulag Archipelago 1918-1956’

    In the hierarchy of operations, the mainspring of money is at the highest rank, well above religion; above Freemasonary, above any sort of dubious connections. All activities must be funded. Franklin’s and Hamilton’s actions defunded the usurers.

    Hamilton is a more complex case than Franklin, as Hamilton really believed that the First Bank was to be 50:50 government/private. He had installed a sinking fund to pay down the privateer stock owners (many Dutch Jews), which was never used.

    Hamilton later opposed the sale of First Bank government stock to the Baring Brothers, indicating Hamilton’s true intentions.

    Hitler is not even ambiguous, the NSDAP party funding apparatus was small donations. Then Hitler, Reinhardt, and Schacht immediately started issuing Bills of Credit, such as Mefobills and Oeffabills – this to put Germans back to work.

    This had the effect of galvanizing the international usurers toward war with Germany, as their confidence game depends on deception. The deception must not be revealed.

    Full spectrum dominance requires first owning the money power, to then take rents, usury, and unearned income, to then fund false religion, and false narrative, to then dupe the public.

    The Goyim are animals to be milked, or a better analogy: Honey bees to be farmed and harvested.

    Freemasonary is well down in the hierarchy as part of false narrative.

  87. JimDandy says:
    @Colin Wright

    How about Zionist thug, Paddy Chayevsky’s epic projection in Network?

    What a fucking asshole that guy was.

    Later in the show, the screenwriter Paddy Chayefsky, who had won an Oscar for “Network” the previous year, took the stage to present the screenplay awards. But first he said, “I would like to suggest to Miss Redgrave that her winning an Academy Award is not a pivotal moment in history, does not require a proclamation and a simple ‘Thank you’ would’ve sufficed.”

    Chayefsky, an ardent supporter of Israel, received an ovation.

    Chayefsky later said Redgrave “tried to speak to me afterward, and I cut her dead.”

    • Agree: Colin Wright
    • Replies: @Mulga Mumblebrain
  88. Mefobills says:

    The best comment so far:

    “When wars go hot, that is only the tip of the Iceberg.”

    This is what I said, using context:

    When wars go hot, that is only the tip of the Iceberg. The majority of the actions happened below the surface, long before the war breaks out into open hostilities.

    Anybody who isn’t a disinfo agent, or a gas-bag, knows that hostile activities happen in the background long before wars break out into the open, i.e. go hot.

    You were so busy scanning the comments section, probably to please your Hasbara pay-masters, you lost context, and now look like AFool.

  89. Trinity says:
    @Mike Fridelle

    Hmm, so what you are saying is the jew is invincible and Whites better learn their role. lololol. It is the jew way or the highway? Yeah right. Wonder what happens when people say NO MORE?

    The “elites” and their offspring aka the Kennedy clan, the Bush clan, Trump brood, etc., are pretty worthless when all is said and done. The little Austrian was a down and out artist and a pretty good artist IMO. A jew mocking Hitler’s artwork? Considering what the jew thinks is art, that is rich. What can you expect from a rich person like Kennedy or Trump? Nothing really, these type have made their money off the backs, blood, sweat and tears of others. Was Kennedy’s father a bootlegger by chance?

    Some famous boxer once said that “it is hard to wake up and do roadwork when you are wearing silk pajamas.” No it wasn’t Marvin Hagler who stole that line I am pretty sure of it. It was either Jake LaMotta, Rocky Graziano or maybe Tony Galento.

    Didn’t some lady sing that freedom is nothing left to lose? The savior of America IF there is going to be one will come from the people, the working class. It won’t be some artsy fartsy (((historian))) who just copies down what he reads, or some Jew Yawk bidness man who has a jewish son in law.

  90. Dube says:

    Rather than accept cookies to watch this film, and so check my memory, I’ll try to recall the climactic scene of Nathan standing with his back to a pillar in the stock exchange, crying out courageously, “I’m buying! I’m buying!” while music swells, and he, alone with just a flower sent by his wife for his lapel, risks his fortune to save panicked investors who are uncertain of the outcome at Waterloo. The investors are steadied, but it looks as if love is all that remains for Nathan. But see! A carrier pigeon wings down from the sky with news of Wellington’s victory. The realm is stabilized, and Nathan succeeds with his patriotic gamble. I can’t certainly recall that the movie ends with Nathan ascending to the peerage, but that has to be the way to write it.

  91. @Triteleia Laxa

    Or maybe he’s one of the few who decided to take off the blue-tinted glasses.

  92. @HdC

    I agree to some extent, but many of those Jews who served were mischlings or less. I think the German Jewish population may have approximated 700-800K. So the discrimination hammer fell on a larger number of ppl than you calculate

    It is noteworthy to me that the Frank family, including Anne Frank, emigrated a short drive over the border to the Netherlands. When the war broke out in 1939 they did not move to either the Dutch East Indies (Carribean), or Indonesia. Or any other Dutch colony. So whatever impression the new German government left with the Franks, it was not one that they should flee as far as possible.

    I wonder how many French Jews departed for Algeria then a fully integrated of France. Or any other colony.

  93. Trinity says:

    This has me thinking of that jewish comedy from years ago, well at least I considered it a comedy, it was the movie, “Marathon Man.” I mean this is a good choice considering the Olympics and all. This movie came out in the Seventies and starred (((Dustin Hoffman))) as some dude who runs long distances in his spare time. I can’t recall if this dude just fantasized about being a competitive runner during his runs or he was actually training for competition. What little I can remember is some Notsee dude was living in Argentina and for some reason he comes to NYC to hunt down the Hoffman character. Notsee guy shaves head and becomes what may have been the first official skinhead ever in America. haha. After all we are talking 1976 here. I’m guessing the chrome dome look was to make Notsee dude unrecognizable to all those holocaust victims living in NYC some thirty years later. teehee. It doesn’t work. I recall little about this dumb ass movie other than the scene where some jewess hag recognizes the chrome dome ex Notsee despite his Mr. Clean look and being 30 years older. Dig it, this jewess spots a Notsee dude in some crowded NYC street that just so happens to have been at the camp she was held in during WWII. Think of the odds? Oh, I am sorry, I forgot we are talking about another jewish hollywood fairy tale here not real life. Next thing someone will be telling me that a holocaust victim escaped and lived with wolves or another victim swallowed and shit diamonds during her stay in the camps.

    • Replies: @Mulga Mumblebrain
  94. @Trinity

    “Smoky Mountain Rain”… that song by Ronnie Milsap.

    • Replies: @Trinity
  95. JimDandy says:

    Pot makes you feel like you sound smart, but…

    • LOL: DaveE
  96. @The Plutonium Kid

    Is being so special not a bit lonely?

    • Replies: @Colin Wright
  97. Mehen says:
    @Triteleia Laxa

    I see Fran Taubman has discovered the wisdom of Marianne Williamson.

    • LOL: Colin Wright
  98. Trinity says:
    @Dr. Charles Fhandrich

    It is a good tune. Kind of has a similar theme to another song with “rain” in the title, “Kentucky Rain” by Elvis and written by Eddie Rabbitt IF I am not mistaken. Eddie sang a song titled, “I Love A Rainy Night. “Rain” is a common theme in a lot of tunes. “Rainy Night In Georgia,” “Purple Rain,” “November Rain”, “Who’ll Stop The Rain”, “Raindrops Keep Falling On My Head,” “Have You Ever Seen The Rain,” “Blue Eyes Crying In the Rain,” “Singing In The Rain,” they go on and on and on…. And a lot of them are some good tunes.

    My own personal views on “rain” are “I Can’t Stand The Rain” and I prefer the Tina Turner cover over the original. “I Wish It Would Rain Down On Me” is a good tune, Phil, but it isn’t my wish.

    Cue: Kentucky Rain by Elvis Presley. My personal favorite “Rain” song.

  99. @The Plutonium Kid

    ‘Or maybe he’s one of the few who decided to take off the blue-tinted glasses.’

    In my case, and when it comes to Jews, that would actually be a more accurate metaphor.

  100. @Triteleia Laxa

    ‘…Is being so special not a bit lonely?’

    God, you’re witty and intelligent. Are you sure you’re not Jewish?

    • Replies: @Triteleia Laxa
  101. DaveE says:

    “Louisiana Rain” by Tom Petty is my favorite.

    • Replies: @Trinity
  102. anarchyst says:
    @Houston 1992

    The Frank family’s greed is what got them arrested and sent to the work camps. The whole family was heavily involved in “black market operations” and couldn’t temper their thirst for shekels.
    Supposedly, Ann Frank perished while her father lived to see the end of WW2, being treated in a “death camp” hospital. Since when did “death camps” need a hospital?
    Ann Frank’s “diary” is partially written with a ball-point pen, not invented until well after WW2.

  103. @HdC

    “According to a published book ‘Hitler’s Jewish Soldiers’ there were 150,000 Jewish soldiers in the German armed forces, with ranks as high as general.”

    Admiral Gunther Lutjens, who commanded Operation Rhine, was part Jewish. He was killed when his flagship BISMARCK was sunk on May 27, 1941.

  104. @Colin Wright

    You don’t feel special? Or feeling special doesn’t also feel lonely to you?

    • Replies: @Mehen
  105. @Mefobills

    Proof Christianity is not Jew promoted:

    Full spectrum dominance requires first owning the money power, to then take rents, usury, and unearned income, to then fund false religion, and false narrative, to then dupe the public.

    The Goyim are animals to be milked, or a better analogy: Honey bees to be farmed and harvested.

    Jesus’ first recorded public statement (Luke 4:16-30) was a reading of Isaiah 61.

    So there can be no disputing what he said, or what it meant – 11QMelchizedek: mandate for perpetual cycle of debt absolutions, i.e., restoration of Mosaic Law which the heretics of Hillel led Rabbinical Judaism with its Pharisees priest class were violating then as now.

    Forerunners of today’s Jews didn’t invent or promote Christianity; then as now they seek genocide of Christians including the descendants of Christendom, whites.

    • Replies: @Mefobills
  106. Trinity says:

    Tom Petty & Heartbreakers did indeed put out some great music. I always liked “Breakdown,” “Refugee” and “You Got Lucky” from the boys from Gainesville.

    I am thinking about some of those rock groups that displayed the Confederate battle flag back in the day, Petty was among them along with of course Lynyrd Skynyrd and maybe a few others. Imagine a Southern rock and roll band playing to a packed all White or damn sure nearly all White audience in Oakland, California of all places and right behind them is a huge Confederate battle flag. Tons of California babes enjoying some good music in the sun while Skynyrd plays some good ole Southern rock and roll. Can you even imagine something like that happening in today’s society? Nothing but a sea of beautiful and slim White girls with no tattoos, beautiful complexions and absolutely no one giving a damn about a flag. Hell, even British rock star Billy Idol would sport the Stars and Bars on guitars, shirts and in his videos back in the day. People wanting to hate on Boomers should go and back it it up to that video of Skynyrd playing “Freebird” to an all ATTRACTIVE WHITE AUDIENCE IN OAKLAND circa 1977 or thereabouts. Boomers vs. Millennials? You gotz to be kidding me.

    Cue: Long Haired Country Boy by Charlie Daniels Band

    • Replies: @JimDandy
    , @Jack McArthur
  107. Skeptikal says:

    It seems obvious that Nazi films were not meant to reflect actual conditions in the Third Reich but were either propaganda or escapism or a combo of both.

    Why would you expect “realism” a la The Bicycle Thief to emerge under the Third Reich?

    The premise seems ludicrous.

    • Replies: @Malla
  108. ivan says:

    Don’t sweat it, usually these guys perhaps not Commentator Mike; but generally do not want the things that you post to be better known. In this particular case, you have the daily experience of the Germans as they watch movies. Are they shouting for Jews to be killed? Invading the world? No. This humanises the Germans of the Third Reich, and as we know many do not like that to put it mildly.

    I am no supporter of Hitler, but the ordinary Germans as seen through their movies were just as good or bad people as anybody else.

    I’ve learnt much from you posts and like the way you take apart some of the irritating trolls especially the Islamic and Chicom partisans.

  109. anarchyst says:

    You make excellent points about life within the Third Reich.
    Hitler is never seen speaking in a normal soft voice. The propaganda outlets always portray him as a bombastic, angry, irrational individual although the opposite is true.
    Witness the “American History Channel” propaganda outlet that portrays anything coming out of the Third Reich as evil, always “up to no good”, to be used only for death and destruction, with Hitler being portrayed as a drug addict, irrational evil person.
    In many respects, Germany was ahead of the USA in scientific and technological areas, hence, the German scientists being “picked up” and transported to the USA (operation paperclip) after WW2.
    In addition, many jews lived quite comfortably in Germany for the duration of the war. As was previously stated in another post, many jews were a part of the German armed forces during WW2 as well.

  110. The latest trend appears to be No Mention of Jews Allowed, good or bad.

    Marjorie Taylor Greene learned this the hard way at Holocaust Reeducation Camp for comparing COVID-19 safety measures to the persecution of Jews during the Holocaust (a comparison becoming more accurate every day.)

  111. Mefobills says:

    So there can be no disputing what he said, or what it meant – 11QMelchizedek: mandate for perpetual cycle of debt absolutions, i.e., restoration of Mosaic Law which the heretics of Hillel led Rabbinical Judaism with its Pharisees priest class were violating then as now.

    Yes, and modern judeo-christians are heretics, as they have amnesia about what Jesus really said and meant.

    Jesus was for restoration and balance for civilization. False religion is not for balance, but instead is desirous of sordid gain for their in-group.

    The Pharisee priest class wanted perpetual Creditor rights, to then milk debtors forever.

    The economist Thorstein Vleben described this class. Vleben was a “free farmer” something like Schacht’s family, so both economists had independence and freedom of thought.

    Leisure class — members of the upper class who are exempt from productive work.[1]
    Pecuniary superiority — the leisure class is engaged primarily in demonstrating their “pecuniary superiority” by abstaining from productive work.[1]
    Pecuniary emulation — the effort to meet or exceed someone else’s financial status.[9]
    Pecuniary struggle — the struggle to acquire and exhibit wealth (private property) in order to gain status.[1]
    Vicarious leisure: leisure engaged in by wives/servants as evidence of the wealth of the master. (If your servants do not have to engage in productive labor, you must be wealthy.)[1]
    Estranged leisure — the leisure of the servants is not their own. It is engaged by them on behalf of their employer.[1]

    Our (((friends))) became mal-formed after Hillel, and then subsequent rise of Talmudic Judaism.

    If we went back in time to observe Hillel, it would be a fair bet that he engaged in conspicuous consumption and conspicuous leisure.

  112. Mehen says:
    @Triteleia Laxa

    Being an independent thinker tends to foster feelings of alienation, yes.

    This is the price one pays for valuing one’s judgement over that of others. In particular, those “others” who are equally wrestling with their own personal biases/demons.

    You seem to be particularly insistent in undermining the commenters here who exhibit the exact trait you lack.

    What’s new, Fran?

    Bonus Question: why are you so realistic regarding black/white relations while at the same time retreating into pilpul/bafflegag when the topic of Organized Jewry is raised, hmmmmmmm?

  113. JimDandy says:

    As Billy Idol tells it, he was drinking Rebel Yell with Keith Richards, and they both vowed to write a song with that name. So, add the Stones to they list.

    Tom Petty is incredibly underrated, probably because he has such broad appeal. The fact that he was a white southerner probably doesn’t help.

    • Replies: @Trinity
  114. @Schuetze

    I only recognize Kelly and Corbett but I totally endorse both of those and I am going to at least sample the others.

  115. @Priss Factor

    It’s my understanding that Trevor Lynch is the nom-de-film-critic of Greg Johnson of Counter-Currents.

  116. I prefer ‘I Married a Witch’.

  117. @Trinity

    You’ve gotta admit that Larry Oliver makes a convincing Nazi.

    • Replies: @Trinity
  118. @JimDandy

    Vanessa Redgrave’s small speech was eloquent, truthful, sincere and brave. No wonder the Zionazis hated it. Today she’d have been arrested on the spot.

  119. @Schuetze

    It is abundantly clear that the goals listed as Shciff’s mission have now been comprehensively accomplished. The evil and pernicious nature of Jewish power has obviously been carefully planned and executed to perfection. Integral to this mission is to obviate any efforts aimed at reversing, resisting or subverting the new order. The mission has not only succeeded beyond belief, those surrendering to the new order have become its most vocal proponents to the extent of putting their lives on the line and fighting wars that serve the interests of their new owners. I fear that the control is so complete that any attempts at subverting this order via upheavals or genuine revolution will be rendered feeble and futile. Face it people, a brave new world of capitulate or perish is now upon us. Back to our cell phones and gadgets.

    • Thanks: Schuetze
  120. @Mefobills

    That should provide foundation for a PhD! I may pass it on. Thanks.

    I’m not sure “finance capitalism” deserves to be anathematised. It is true that politicians and public servants (like middling employees of ratings agencies?) are likely to be inadequate to the regulation of the clever manoeuvres of Wall Strret financiers and lawyers but I suspect you underesti.ate the positive part that M&A and capital raising for IPOz has played..

    • Replies: @Mefobills
  121. Malla says:

    Thank you for your kind words. Yes these truths were a burden for some time in the early days but by now I have kind of made peace with it. In earlier days, I was very depressed like you yourself went through.

    As a Vietnamese American whose parents lived through the war, much of what you shared corroborates with their take on it.

    Wow thanks. Glad to hear this. It means I am on the right path.
    Check out my recent posts on Cuba too. We have been lied about Cuba as well.

    the (official) history and narrative I learned in American high school was so counter to what my parents and community shared that it depressed me.

    Yeah, I know. Makes one wonder how much of what we know about history is true. Maybe one needs to get detached from it and do our best to enlighten others about facts. Maybe this Universe is unfair but we have do the best out of it. It was great “talking” to you.

  122. Malla says:

    Thanks, your post reminds me of this book by a good Jewish person Samuel Roth.He was a Jewish guy who was “self critical” of the Jewish people and had written a book about it.
    Jews must live; an account of the persecution of the world by Israel on all the frontiers of civilization

    In Chapter 10, The Jew as a Lawyer, he writes about how Jews corroded the Anglo Saxon style honest legal system of the USA and the West.

  123. Malla says:

    It seems obvious that some people cannot give up their mental conditioning.
    What we know about the Third Reich is filtered through layers of illusion and propaganda. What we think we know about them is not what it was like.

  124. Fr. John says:
    @El Dato

    “Anti-semitism” is the ink of the squid.”

    Excellent analogy!

    Because [sic] “Jews” are NOT genetically “Semites,” as Dr. Elhaik’s well-denounced (therefore, TRUE) DNA research has AGAIN corroborated, this is an old CANARD of the Tribe, to DEFLECT CRITICISM OF ANYTHING AND EVERYTHING THEY DO.

    It is, ‘the ink of the squid.’

    And it’s time to go out into the seas with a harpoon…. if you know what I mean.

  125. Mefobills says:
    @Wizard of Oz

    I suspect you underestimate the positive part that M&A and capital raising for IPOz has played..

    There’s room for speculative activity in an industrial capitalist economy.

    China is a good example of this in action.

    Glass-Steagall was a ring-fencing for speculative capital. Gamblers could not pass on risk into the everyday transaction economy, instead risk takers took it in the shorts when their gambles failed. When Glass-Steagall was broken with GLB, the housing bubble was turbocharged due to heads I win, tails you lose, passing of risk into everyday transaction economy.

    Canada’s sovereign economy 1938-74 had individuals and families banding together with pooled savings, to then take risk. The path began with debt free money issued by BOC into the commons and industry, which then became wages, which then became savings; savers pooled their money into trusts (savings and loans). These savings then became capital for pooled risk.

    Think of risk taking as something like economic forward guidance; if done right, then the economy can move forward into new arenas. Mankind is a creative animal, and industrial capitalism always understood that. For example, American public colleges were injected with state capital (Treasury money) to do research and development, fostering new physical and technical economy. The U.S. used to be industrial capitalist, and there is still some residual effects.

    Mergers and Acquisitions are often negative activity. Hedge funds borrow (hypothecate) new private bank credit into existence, to then acquire a targeted company, to then dismember it. During the hypothecation event hedgers will use the companies assets as the basis of the loan, including pension funds. The hedger then dismembers the company, pockets pension funds, and spits out former employees into the streets; unemployed who then become wards of the public taxpayer.

    Finance capitalists pass hypnosis that their activates are a net good for society. Prices and money are the only metric for success, never-mind that the economic body and civilization is much more complex.

    Finance Capitalism and a democratic republic are antithetical.

    China’s communist party is not inadequate to the task. Any sort of civilization has to train an elite to operate the levers of power. The question has always been, how do you find and train this elite?

  126. Trinity says:
    @Mulga Mumblebrain

    Yes he did. Another scene that I remember from that movie is when “Larry” was walking away from the jewess who recognized him and out pops another old jew who also recognizes him, good ole Larry has some sort of Batman gimmick where a knife comes out his sleeve and he slices the jew’s throat. I think I will watch this flick again just for the hell of it. I thought it was bad but not so bad that it was unwatchable. The jewess screaming , “Szell,” ” Szell,” “Szell,” I swear I started laughing at that scene and will laugh even more now. hahaha.

    Think of the odds of not only one jew recognizing Larry, but two jews on the same street identifying him 30 years later and even after he gives himself a special haircut disguise. Only in jew fairy tales. hahaha.

  127. Malla says:

    Thank you for your encouraging words. You are right.

    Islamic and Chicom partisans.

    Islamic partisans like KA, barr and some crackpot/s posting as Anon are not any different from our home grown Hindutva thugs. Exactly the same in mentality. They are just the Islamic versions of our Hindutvas. They both deserve each other.
    Chicoms like Deep Thought, ddan, Jeo wong are no different, not one bit than our Indian nationalist psychos who ironically hate China. Same mentality all of them. LOL, it is as if our nationalists give them Chicoms taste of their own medicine.

  128. Trinity says:

    Yeah, Keef seemed to always show love for the South. I remember a scene in the movie, “Gimme Shelter” which showed the Stones rehearsing down in Muscle Shoals, Alabama and Keef was collecting brochures about restaurants, vacation spots etc., from the area. The Stones even had a couple or “tree” songs with a country vibe /Southern rock vibe to them. Triple shot of Stones country/Southern rock hits.

    Cue: “Honky Tonk Woman”, “Wild Horses,” and “Far Away Eyes” by Mick & The Boys

    • Replies: @(((They))) Live
    , @JimDandy
  129. @Mehen

    The article itself is full of facts which are extremely inconvenient for your thesis. Yet you can’t register them.

    If someone saw black people are the epitome of all evil, or the driving force behind world affairs, I would adopt the same approach.

    The reason is that such a person is unable to know anything about the world. They haven’t even pierced the veil of their own antisocial psychology. All facts filter through it and they are left with a completely distorted image.

    You must know that I am right on some level. Have the courage to admit this possibility to yourself and play with it. The rewards are infinite.

    • Replies: @Colin Wright
  130. Kali says:

    If someone saw black people are the epitome of all evil, or the driving force behind world affairs, I would adopt the same approach.

    So would I. Because it’s a ludicrous proposition.

    But why apply the same measure to an entirely different group with an entirely diffetent history, motivation, stratergy and possition?

    Until you study history, particularly of the 20th century, then your oppinion remains unqualified and your judgement/diagnosis abitrary.


    • Agree: Mehen
  131. @Houston 1992

    It is reliably reported that Anne Frank’s father dedicated himself during those nederlandse years to first the invention then the perfection of the Ballpoint Pen.

    Being outstandingly humane and moved by seeing Anne often with writer’s cramp, he wished to help her and all children.

    It is a very moving story and it is understood that a Hollywood script is in the works to recognise this unsung Jewish hero. Similar Jews with outstanding love for children are being worked into the story like for ex. Leo Frank in Georgia USA for providing employment to children in a Pencil Factory which is close enough to Ballpoint Pens for the talmudic script writers.

    This blockbuster film will be followed by a UN appeal to recognise the Ballpoint Pen as a fully Jewish invention.

  132. anonymous[218] • Disclaimer says:

    Can CRT become LAW??? Holocaust/ANTi Semitic Criminal/Penal Codes Speech Codes?? vrs the Constitution..??? Noahide LAWS???

  133. Z-man says:

    As far as Tucker Carlson is concerned if he calls out the Jew he’ll be off TV and wont be able to influence anybody anymore as his reputation will be destroyed by the Juden controlled press. He has to skate a fine line to get ‘our’* points across. And yes he doesn’t need the money.
    *America First, anti NEOCON, real patriotic agenda.

  134. Peläez says:

    Fuerzas Ocultas : Masonería : (Subtitulos Español) // Forces Occultes // 1943 // Francia

    • Agree: Mulegino1
  135. JimDandy says:

    And how about “Dear Doctor”? Yeah, it might have been in that same doc that Mick was ripping on American food (which I thought was rich, coming from a Brit) but saying that in the south there was some really “interesting” (good) grub.

    • Replies: @Trinity
  136. Trinity says:

    Some parts of the South do have great grub. White Southern cuisine was STOLEN by Blacks who then labeled it “Soul Food.”

    HOWEVER, even in Georgia, the difference between the north Georgia mountain hillbilly cooking and the rednecks in south Georgia is like night and day. Since my kinfolk are from south Georgia I can affectionately call them flat land hillbillies. hehe. South Georgia cooking is SCRUMPTIOUS. This is what is referred to as “soul food” by Negro cultural appropriation thieves and uninformed Yankees. Florida natives cook the same way as south Georgians, but these cats in the mountains of north Georgia can’t cook for shit. The cole slaw has no carrots and is ground up to shit, it looks like something someone picked out of a garbage can. And good ole Southern Brunswick stew is SUPPOSED TO BE THICK, which it is in Florida and South Georgia, up here in the mountains, the shit has the consistency of soup and is just awful. IF you are ever in Georgia do not stop at any restaurants above Atlanta, hell, to be on the safe side, don’t stop to eat at any food joint north of Macon for that matter.

    Florida is also loaded with great Cuban restaurants were they pile your plate full of food. South Carolina? Lived in the town of Greenwood for awhile and the food there was just like south Georgia and native Floridian cooking. I have no idea what the problem is with north Georgia. Worst place I have ever been for food among the states or places that I have lived.

    Btw, coming home today, I heard on the radio that Mick Jagger turned 78 today. Good gawd, where does time go. And these cats are still going to tour. Holy shit, a 78 year old rocker. Happy Birthday to Mick.

  137. @Mehen

    ‘What’s new, Fran?’

    This isn’t Fran. That woman’s seriously stupid and only semi-literate, and neither criticism can be leveled at Triteleia.

    He could be AaronB — but I’m missing the clumsy attempts at manipulation.

    • Agree: Mehen
    • Replies: @Mehen
    , @Mehen
  138. @Triteleia Laxa

    ‘… The rewards are infinite.’

    Now that I am skeptical of.

    • Agree: Mehen
  139. Malla says:

    The excellent movie on Frederick the Great made in the Third Reich is available online

    Der Große König (no subtittles)

    The Great King (Germany, 1942) English subtitles part1.
    The movie with English subtitles but broken into 11 parts

    Excellent movie. Great performance by Otto Gebühr as Frederick the Great. Shows the emotions and the sense of duty of a Great King.
    The film is a depiction of the Führerprinzip, with the analogy to Adolf Hitler being so clear that Hitler sent a print to Benito Mussolini.Goebbels also regarded it as instructive that current sufferings would be a source of strength. Goebbels had some difficulty with the Army High Command over this film, because it depicted the king left in the lurch by his general. He complained that the army felt that any depiction, however historical, reflected badly on them. The movie does not show the Russian generals (like General Czernitscheff) in bad light as some would expect from a Third Reich movie, just that they make plans to save themselves from an unfortunate difficult situation, King Frederick outs those plans and uses it for his own advantage against Austria, which does not harm the Russian Generals in the long run.

  140. Mehen says:
    @Colin Wright

    Thanks for the feedback. I’m still about 90% sure Triteleia is Fran in a new skin-suit, but that may just be me wrestling with my attraction to Triteilia

  141. Mehen says:
    @Colin Wright

    Speaking of AaronB, where has he been lately?

    He’s another I have mixed feelings about.

    I have a saved screed of his that really pierced me, and I’ve shared it elsewhere.

    (Details available upon request)

  142. With a recommendation from Gilad Atzmon and now this review, I decided to have a look at the movie. Plus it’s free on YouTube.

    It precedes the (what seems like) yearly Holocaust movies in being a not too good movie nominated for an Academy Award. It must have came across as glowing enough towards the tribe, despite a couple of clumsy “tropes” slipping in. One trope being the portrayal of the Rothschilds principles as skinflints.

    But it was no doubt not just an answer to the rise of Hitler and his ideology, but to the great depression in the U.S.. Who caused the depression? Such economic calamities have the common man casting his gaze at the rich, in the form of bankers. But, hey, don’t blame the Rothschild bankers {Jews}, they’re only in the business because the mean old gentiles deprived them of other forms of industry. They only want their dignity. And first chance they get, they’ll try to bring peace to the world by backing the foes of the warlord Napoleon. I don’t think the movie implied that it was Rothschild himself spreading rumors of Napoleon’s success, when he already knew that Napoleon had been defeated – in order to manipulate the market in Rothschild’s favor.

    Anyway, a slight education for the goyim about the Jewish tribe and Hollywood.

  143. @Trinity

    Whew, did your comments kick off a stream of pleasant memories for me of my youth, many moons ago. Kentucky Rain is one of my favorite Elvis songs. One can easily visualize everything he is singing about, which is the same I can say for Brook Benton’s, “Rainy Night in Georgia”, which came out around the same time as Elvis’s tune. As for “Singing in the Rain” goes, the song was ruined for me after seeing the movie, A Clockwork Orange. LOL

    • Replies: @Trinity
  144. @ivan

    I’m just disappointed that Malla is living up to the stereotype of a typical Indian plagiarist without quoting original sources while quoting extensively, and in India it is not uncommon for even senior academicians to plagiarise books by foreign authors wholesale, not to mention articles they publish in their academic journals.

    So he offered an explanation. Should I now accuse him of another Indian stereotype, that of being a liar?

    He knows well that our editor greatly respects lengthy erudite comments of a high standard, unlike brief quips I and some others favour, but I presume that Ron expects these learned and scholarly contributions to be original. So is this Malla trying to curry favour with the editor, yet another Indian stereotype, this ingratiating yourself with your superiors in the hierarchy of whatever and wherever, even the hierarchy of intellects on UR?

    Notice also how instead of just quoting the entire text under the MORE tag he breaks it up into several shorter texts so that he can get more visual attention from the commentariat. Probably yet another Indian stereotype, this attention seeking.

    • Replies: @ivan
    , @Malla
  145. Trinity says:
    @Dr. Charles Fhandrich

    Ronnie Milsap played keyboards on Kentucky Rain with Elvis. I never knew it rained so much in the Atlanta area so there are lots of “Rainy Nights In Georgia.” I believe I read somewhere that the Atlanta metro receives more rain per year than Seattle. I guess the people that run Atlanta don’t want the word to get out that “Hotlanta” is a depressing, rainy and dreary place. haha. Atlanta receives over 51 inches of rain per year on average while “rainy” Seattle clocks in at just over 38 inches. Wow. Mobile, Alabama registers well over 60 inches per year.

    Maybe California perhaps? I hear “It Never Rains In Southern California.” haha. Yet another “rain” song.

    • Replies: @Dr. Charles Fhandrich
  146. @Trinity

    Imagine a Southern rock and roll band playing to a packed all White or damn sure nearly all White audience in Oakland, California of all places and right behind them is a huge Confederate battle flag. Tons of California babes enjoying some good music in the sun while Skynyrd plays some good ole Southern rock and roll. Can you even imagine something like that happening in today’s society?

    For anyone who has not seen it:

    • Thanks: Trinity
    • Replies: @DrWatson
  147. @Trinity

    It’s true how some of these statistics are very confusing. Someone told me that Chicago also, is not necessarily the windiest city. I grew up in Southern California at a time when it would rain like crazy. Many of the streets would be flooded half way out from the sewer. This has all changed in the last 40 years when the rain has been decreasing and the streets are now never flooded. Does this mean there is global warming going on? I don’t know. It would seem so. Are we humans responsible for it? Who really knows? Some scientists are predicting a mini ice age, as happened in Europe around 400 years ago and lasted around 40 years!

  148. @Schuetze

    The Lauder family (Cosmetics) have successfully navigated the tax loopholes upon the passing of the company founder, ensuring the family is one of the world’s richest.

    NEW YORK–(BUSINESS WIRE)– The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. (NYSE: EL) today reported net sales of \$4.85 billion for its second quarter ended December 31, 2020,

  149. @Trinity

    “This is why I know Trump is full of shit. After they stole the election and he had nothing to lose, I would have been dropping some truth bombs left and right before I was ushered out of the White House. Trump is 70 something, and is in his winter years, go out with a bang”

    Back in 2015 during Trump’s campaign stops at UIC ( Illinois Public University just west of downtown Chicago) Trump chickened out by not making an appearance. I attended with my son and that’s a long story. I wondered about the venue because he could have scheduled this event in one of the outlying suburbs without so many problems. Instead or whoever has his ear scheduled this event in the heart of a Chicago liberal, ME, Mexican, African country. WTF!! How stupid do you have to be!

    Now All I get is emails asking for money for Trump. There is something not right here.

    So when Jan 6th rolled around did anyone in their right mind think that Trump would show up and lead the troops? I certainly didn’t. I smelled chicken shit. But a lot of people did not smell the shit. I feel sorry for them. They should go back to their football, baseball and basketball and drink their beer and eat their doritos and chips and visit the crapper.

    • Replies: @Trinity
  150. @Wizard of Oz

    “atrocity story brought to the Allies by escaped Poles”

    Maybe some people think that Roman Polanski (Raymond Thierry Liebling), Jerzy Kosiński (born Józef Lewinkopf) etc, etc were Polish. You would be fooled and mistaken. These are the Cosmopolitan Jews. Same story in America.

    • Replies: @Dube
  151. Dube says:

    Look up the Polish envoy Jan Karski who reported not only to Frankfurter but also to Roosevelt. Frankfurter was incredulous, and said, “I can’t believe you,” emphasizing the can’t. Roosevelt asked about the wellbeing of the Polish Arabian horses, took deep draughts through his long cigarette holder and blew smoke to the ceiling.

  152. Trinity says:

    I have heard more than one interviewee being interviewed say that a great deal of the Capital police let them enter the Capital Building unopposed. SET UP, anyone. And yes, I do hold Trump, Donnie Jr, Rudy and that other clown, some politician from Alabama, responsible for INCITING those people that day. Like the true rich and do nothings always do, Trump, Rudy, and Donnie “American Psycho” Trump Jr., let the poor, working class dogs do their fighting for them. Or was the fighting “for them?” Is Trump & Co. in on all of this just like all those FBI, Mossad agents, and others posing as “protesters” and inciting the mob to commit criminal acts? Inciting a crowd to commit a crime so you can arrest them later? God, how much lower does it get than that and we wonder why this nation has fallen??? No integrity, no principles, no honesty, mocking those and arresting those who you just played for suckas, all in the name of jew-mock-rac(e)y.

    IMO, the Trump and Rudy brood are no different than those FBI and Mossad plants out there to incite and entrap people. I have suspected for a long time that this script is straight out of WWE. Notice that Trump ALWAYS pardons his old jew cronies and Black rappers, God forbid he pardon someone like Assange or the Fields kid of his federal charges while the useless loudmouth was in office.

    • Agree: europeasant
  153. ivan says:
    @Commentator Mike

    You’ll have to excuse him, since
    a) He did not claim that the quotes were original with him
    b) the original writers, put it much better than most of could
    c) it is always better to have such evidence as he puts up, in one place
    d) he is not simply cutting and pasting, but provides commentary when needed.

    He just happens to be a maverick Indian, who is by nature a contrarian.
    There are a few of us like that around.

    • Thanks: Commentator Mike
  154. Jimmy1969 says:

    An interesting article with a few facts that have not been well manifested. But to get real and enter into the last 50 or so years of Hollywood….you never see one single pro Palestinian film, but you see hundreds of Zionist films….ditto that for books in every public library in North America.

  155. Anon[167] • Disclaimer says:

    Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, YouTube and TikTok failed to act on 84% of posts spreading anti-Jewish hatred and propaganda reported via the platforms’ official complaints system.

    For 10 years Israel would post most racist ,violence promoting videos , speeches , and remarks against Palestinian . Facebook on its part would delete the 90 % of the Palestinian posts requested by Israel .

    House Negroes like UK and other are blaming Iran for attack on some Jew dinghy while has never raised one word out of their fellatio- tired lips against Israeli attack against Iran or Syria .

  156. Vaterland says:

    For what it’s worth, two or three years ago when I was optimistic about China, I saw it as the closest state to the Third Reich that exists today and the legitimate heir of what had been tried to achieve through National Socialism. Not if one gets lost in the particular details, but if one looks at the bigger picture. Fundamentally it is not so much about socialism versus capitalism, but that the great nations can think in terms of centuries, Germany used to be among them, and the greatest nations think in terms of millennia, China might be among them, while the worthless nations think in terms of election cycles.

    The most fundamental colonization of the Europeans was its Jerusalemization, which later mutated into Anglo-Saxon capitalism on the one side and into Judaic Marxism on the other with Protestantism as the binding protein and scientific materialism as its skeleton. While in terms of the Prussian dialectic it was the conflict between the right and left Hegelians. National Socialism, although foremost elected by Protestants whereas German Catholics overall favored the center-right, and Italian Fascism were fundamentally Catholic-Pagan movements, but catholic in the sense of the Roman Catholic Church as the last remnants of the Roman Empire, with the aim of its rebirth, a European Renaissance and the liberation of Europe from its most fundamental self-alienation and colonization which goes far beyond petty national borders. The only true competitor to global capitalism, or communist world revolution. This movement should become the new high civilization only comparable in terms of its lasting effect with Ancient Egypt and it held planetary, then cosmological aims.
    That was destroyed thoroughly and today Germany doesn’t exist anymore in any meaningful way; the world was divided into capitalism and communism. But here already arises the first problem within common understanding of ‘fascism’ in that the Soviet education was much closer to the NS education than the one in liberal capitalism, let alone in the shameful anti-German state which exists now on German soil. The Soviet Union and the 3rd Reich did have more in common with each other than any of them with America or Churchill’s Britain, that is true, but the conflict between both was also as real as the one between right and left Hegelians. The Soviet Union became in its own way life-affirming in contradiction to the nihilistic impulse that is at the root of leftism and the entropy fell into the domain of western consumer society. Russian militarism says yes to life, it says yes to its struggle, it says yes to the nation and it is vitalistic. At the heart of consumption lies decay, death and the craving for dissolution. It was already there long before transgenderism and gay marriage. And the difference between not only this education, but culture and life, is one of the reasons why the last remnants of the German nation are to be found in East Germany and catholic Bavaria while the rest is almost entirely Globohomoplex Americana.

    Now, a true NS economy would never allow Blackrock and Vanguard to expand into its domain, let alone subsidiaries of Rothschild banking, which China all does among many other bad things from a right-wing perspective. And the digital Yuan is not fundamentally more impressive than the digital Euro. On the other hand, China does seem to start doing what I though they had to do: read Carl Schmitt instead of Marx and reestablish Confucianism as the core of its identity. Ultimately Marxism may have served its purpose and the authority of the party ensures the unity of the country, but Marxism remains a remnant of colonialism. When it comes to America, good relations with Washington go through Jerusalem; looking at the way the Chinese delegation treated Anthony Blinken, the great turn might be that good relations with Jerusalem might from now on go through Beijing. Ultimately Js won’t lose power overall, but China will gain so much, that the Js return to their role as court Js and the bankers of the emperor, in this case the one with the mandate of heaven.

    China obviously like Japan before, during and after its empire looked at what worked in the West. And that was very often Germany, but also the dominance of the Js. Japan in the mid 90s had 2/3 of the GDP of the USA with half of its population and I think China also analyzed the crash that followed this peak and will avoid Japan’s pitfall. They are looking for their place in the sun, they know their moment has come and are ready to seize it. And they will. “China, China über alles, über alles in der Welt”.

    China is now in a position as if the Third Reich had successfully established itself as the dominant power in Europe, was armed with nuclear weapons, was lastingly allied with Russia and made the USA/West dependent on itself. It can produce the same level of domestically developed high-technology as Japan finally achieved after mass-produced copies and intellectual theft with more than ten times the population, its universities are rising to world-leaders, its space program is expanding, its colonies surpass the USA, it is not hindered by liberal internal contradictions, it cannot be culturally Americanized, it developed successful competitors to Google, Amazon, Apple, it has sovereignty over its flow of information and it will achieve the same strength as the US MIC within the next decade or so. America’s reputation has never been worse and even its cultural soft-power and attraction, which was its second greatest strength, is in decline. China could, if it wanted to, liberate Germany. Although I don’t see any serious efforts yet – granted it is the most dangerous game. But even if Germany were to be colonized by China, the differences would be far smaller than between actual German culture and the Anglo-Sphere. Confucianism is basically Asian Prussianism, Daoism close to German mysticism, the sense of unity and duty for the collective good before individual profit, or the punishment of corruption can remind you of both the Third Reich and still post-war Germany. A Chinese community of destiny, Schicksalsgemeinschaft, rooted in blood and soil. Obviously superior to what the West has become. And all German philosophers that are often name dropped in the (far) right like Schopenhauer, Nietzsche and Heidegger looked East and you will find admissions of East Asian superiority in all of their writings, apparently including the writings of Hitler himself. Nietzsche called Europe the little island at the flank of Asia and stated that, even though the Europeans perceived themselves as the pinnacle and center of humanity, the East Asians are a hundred times greater.

    Furthermore China before and around the times of the world wars was actually closer to Germany than Japan, it is now also gradually becoming our most important trade partner even before the USA. It was ruined then through the complications of the war when Japan violated the law of the elders in a similar way as Britain acted towards Germany, which was overall more severe than any Italian blunders and our attempts to negotiate peace between both had proven futile. What’s interesting in this regard is that Communist China has rejected matriarchy, US style multi-culturalism, liberalism and LGBT propaganda much better than Taiwan or Spain post Franco. But the closest analogy I can see between us, as German nationalists, and China today is the perception of a century of humiliation. And unlike us, China actually has the power to overcome it. From the tiger in the grass to the rising dragon. I had a reliable crystal ball on Brexit, Trumpism, the trajectory of the US and Merkelism; China I cannot really judge. Which is ultimately also their strength. On the one hand, it could be Germany’s door to liberation, but it could just as likely be the other side of the henchman’s hatchet which puts an end to this most miserable state of affairs. China and Japan were always the other great yearning of Germany next to Rome; we shall see if this love proves one-sided or not or if even a marriage and children come from it.

    • Replies: @Malla
  157. DrWatson says:
    @Jack McArthur

    Thanks for linking this, it was an absolute pleasure to watch and culturally enriching as well as I had not heard about them before. What a fabulous place was California in 1977 (apparently). Sadly, their plane crashed later that year. I knew their song They wrote it as a response to Neil Young’s “Southern Man”. Funnily, Neil Young said this about the song: “My own song ‘Alabama’ richly deserved the shot Lynyrd Skynyrd gave me with their great record. I don’t like my words when I listen to it. They are accusatory and condescending, not fully thought out, and too easy to misconstrue”.

    • Replies: @Jack McArthur
  158. Malla says:

    It was ruined then through the complications of the war when Japan violated the law of the elders

    What rubbish, Japan was facing the same Communist threat in the East as Germany in the West. A Communist threat supported by the American deep state.

  159. Malla says:
    @Commentator Mike

    I am such a great plagiarizing smelly hindoo that I wrote to Achmed E. Newman to give me zero credits for my posts but credit the person from whose videos I got my information.
    Achmed E. Newman wrote
    “I was wondering if I could put this whole comment on my blog with credit of course, in its entirety, with a short introduction and conclusion.”
    My response
    “Sure you can. My posts are for everybody as long as the meaning is not changed. And no need of credits for me. I copy a lot of stuff for others, sometimes I give credit, sometimes it is impossible to do so as well as my own analysis and opinions. So I have myself not been able to give credit to sources as I should have because of various reasons. As far as this post, please give credit to Humberto Fontova and John Suarez.”

    I think someone is extremely bitter since I exposed CUBA for what it is.

  160. @Schuetze

    Actually this broad assertion is totally false : one of the main and most automatically prejudices adopted about the Chinese and East Asians more generally is their supposed conformism, lack of originality, lack of individuation and independent spirit, translating into a tendency to copy rather than to invent when it comes to industry. This is damn false. The European West is characterized first and foremost by the primacy of fashion and group-thinking over objective reason and direct observation. Even science which should be sheltered from group-thinking, and purely experimental, has always been for all practical purposes taught as an ideology, as a catechism in the West : even when experiments are done in school laboratories they are rituals where unforeseen results are 100% unwelcome.

    The West and especially the Anglo-Saxon world could succeed its industrial revolution thanks to its disinterest for absolute truth in favour of a group magical thinking stating that putting people in dark satanic mills would bring some sort of moral salvation though seriousness. England was an especially hostile country to expression of individuality and to direct experience. If you fell that water or juice from a plastic bottle doesn’t taste as good as from a glass or earthen bottle you are wrong because the chemical formulae prove that the molecules are strictly the same. In most of the Orient including modern China you first check whether you can taste the difference by double-blind sampling and if you can nevertheless and other people agree in the same way you are right whatever official science says, which then proves to be a useful approximation for most cases, not universal truth.

    The philosophical school that has always been underlying all the others is Buddhism, which is a religious school where there is essential room for experimental input and personal thought, contrary to Christianity which is not a religion of sacred love as they are wont to say but of sacred speech : you have to blindly submit to a speech totally exterior to your mind and field of personal experience to access salvation, since clinging to personal experience and personally developed logical thought is part of the original sin : this concept of original sin is polluting American mentality more than ever since it has deserted the field of religion : it has led among others to marxism where surrendering to society absolves the sin of existing as an individual, to neoliberalism where money is what decides no any individual and to trans-humanism. Confucianism is not a totalitarian thing like Platonism : unlike the latter it has never splintered into more modern totalitarian ideologies : it is also some sort of homegrown buddhist thing where as a disciple you are supposed to observe with the difference you have to observe society so as to develop a conduct of politeness in the same way you learn a martial art like Tai Chi Quan.

    China had become an universe of stifling conformity only during the Manchu centuries, when it had lost its independence as a nation and a civilisation, when it imposed an ideologized and bureaucratic version of Confucianism and prohibited all Taoism : in other eras it is the place in the world whence invention and creativity normally stem towards other parts of the world : for the author of the Qur’an China was synonymous with top-level precious distant science the rest of the world including his own sacred tribe could only copy, and it can be easily shown that all important inventions that resulted in the Western world passing from medieval to modern, including cheaply available paper and pasta, came from China.

    As for the anglo-saxon world, its superiority is in stealing only, as the English language clearly suggests by its very reductive and impoverished structure joined with an infinite capacity to borrow words and its small number of anglo-saxon words compared to the borrowed ones. England stole its essential inventions from France, which failed to put them into use in time due to political constraints and a certain lack of interest from the deciding elites, and India, whose knowledge was pillaged, and China, which was carefully spied. American industry was all built thanks to the stealing of European patents after having stolen victories in Europe by minimal military implication. England stole its patents to build its textile industry wholesale from China, Japan and India, the latter having also been destroyed as a reward. Even when reduced to utter poverty through the Sassoon omnipotent lobby Chinese textile manufacturing always preceded England. Japan was even more advanced and tried quite in vain to forbid its space to foreigners. Europe and then America were first economically for one reason : they obeyed without curiosity nor discussion to the dictates of world-controlling Jewish finance and bureaucratic expertise. In other words the West consented of its own accord and enthusiasm to sell its soul while China’s had to be taken by ultra-violence.

    If the Jews really believe in Chinese essential docility and lack of personality, so as to concentrate on curbing the Whites’ excess of independent mind, they are in for the worst surprise of their last 3500 years of existence : when China hears about the New World Order scheme their answer is that it is OK with them only if they alone are the central empire running it as its very name indicates, otherwise New World War is the name of their game. The only thing that Europeans really irked the Jews with was a very constraining form of group-thinking fashioned like their own, but deployed in a direction opposed to their interests : the Westerners had to be bribed at a very high material price out of it for another Zion-compatible one and now the bribe is consumed. China never consented to such bribe : it waited for the heavy hands of karma to do its work, they obeyed to the logic imposed by world Jewish power, but this Jewish logic turns out to be less and less profitable to the Sassoons.

  161. @DrWatson

    The lead singer Ronnie Van Zant is actually wearing a Neil Young tee shirt in the concert video above. After the plane crash:

    Young played a show in Miami to raise money for a children’s hospital. Near the end, he played a medley of “Alabama” and “Sweet Home Alabama” as a tribute to the band.

Current Commenter

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone

 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Travis LeBlanc Comments via RSS
How America was neoconned into World War IV
The Shaping Event of Our Modern World
Analyzing the History of a Controversial Movement
The Surprising Elements of Talmudic Judaism
Shouldn't they recuse themselves when dealing with the Middle East?