The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 Peter Bradley Archive
'The Dispossessed Majority' Turns 50
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

If America continues to decline, it will be one of the most amazing and depressing stories ever told. The United States will have gone from almost absolute leadership of the world in the 20th century to just another mediocrity in a very short time. Future Chinese historians will ponder the rapid collapse of such a dynamic nation and wonder what it may mean for their own civilization. For that, they can find no better guide than The Dispossessed Majority (TDM).

Written by Wilmot Robertson in 1972, the author described his book as “an elegy” for a great nation that no longer existed. But much more than that, he explained in detail how and why dispossession happened and even proposed an idea for a renewal, not only for America, but for whites worldwide. Even in 1972, conservatives knew something was wrong with America and were sounding the alarm: high taxes, too much regulation, lack of religion in schools, Marxism, unions, political corruption and loose morals. Their nostrums — cut taxes and government, strengthen the military, and promote “family values” — had no effect on halting America’s descent.

TDM offered one reason for decline. Whites — America’s founders and sustainers — were no longer in charge of the nation they had built. They were also being submerged by racially-conscious non-whites who could never assimilate into American life and would never put country before race. Let us not forget that Robertson started writing TDM in the early-1960s when the US was still about 90 percent white. The rot had set in decades before the US was colonized by the Third World.

Prelude to dispossession

Robertson argues that already by 1972, whites had lost their country, and that his book “records the sorry chronicle of Majority reverses on all the important battlegrounds — cultural, religious, political, economic and diplomatic. Since the liberal-minority coalition has emerged victorious on all fronts, it is not an overstatement to describe the losers as the Dispossessed Majority.”

President Lyndon B. Johnson signing of the 1965 Immigration Act.
President Lyndon B. Johnson signing of the 1965 Immigration Act.

TDM has 39 chapters in 10 sections that go into detail about how whites were dispossessed. Robertson names names, cites dates, and includes an amazing number of little-known facts, often in footnotes. That he did this alone and in pre-internet days is a testament to the author’s knowledge, research, and dedication. You can hardly get a better lesson in real American history. Nor is this dry history; Robertson makes the story of America come alive.

The first section of TDM is called Racial Dynamics. Though we all belong to the same species, humans belong to races. TDM cites hard data on biology and race, but Robertson writes that race — sometimes hard to define with precision — can also be “sensed.” It is an essential element of being human, because men can give up religion, country, or culture, but cannot give up race. It is trendy to say that race doesn’t exist or that whites made it up to justify colonization. Yet racial classification goes back to at least the Bible, which divided mankind into three races. Egyptian depictions show clear racial division with light skinned rulers, tanned workers, and black slaves. The Indian caste system was set up 2,500 years ago and was determined by color and nose shape.

The ancient Greeks tried to understand racial differences. Hippocrates thought climate and geography might have caused different racial temperaments. But it was not until the early 20th century that a comprehensive theory of racial equality was developed. Columbia anthropology professor Franz Boas theorized that culture, not biology, explained racial differences and even claimed head shape could be changed by environment in one or two generations. Despite flimsy evidence and reasoning, racial egalitarians came to dominate anthropology by the 1960s. Their claims — happily touted by the mass media — influenced public policy. Scientists who offered genetic reasons for racial differences had the facts on their side but were ignored, silenced, harassed, or censored.

Franz Boas
Franz Boas

For Robertson, the Civil War marked the start of white decline, as it split the nation and caused the death of over 600,000 whites — weakening America’s founding stock. Only revitalized nationalism during both world wars helped cool the bitterness that conflict caused, particularly among Southerners.

A desire for cheap labor brought blacks to the South. This same desire prompted mass white immigration to the North, starting in the 1840s, first from Ireland and then from other parts of Europe. Many of these whites became “assimilated minorities,” but Robertson counts even some white ethnicities as “unassimilable,” particularly Jews. This is perhaps why he uses the term “Majority” instead of “whites.”

The TDM put great importance on the of the role of Jews in white dispossession. Indeed, a central theme of the book is that a hostile Jewish elite had displaced the old WASP elite starting in the 1930s. Robertson’s discussion of the Boazian school’s takeover of anthropology, for example, emphasizes the number of Jews who were part of that movement. Many members of the old WASP establishment went along with and enabled new elites. Robertson even has terms for them: Gracchites are rich whites who advance their careers and fortunes by catering to minorities, an example being Franklin Roosevelt. Pussyfooters are whites — often lawyers, scientists, professors, or small newspaper editors — who know the score but keep quiet instead of speaking up for their people. Old Believers believed or pretended to believe in old fashioned American liberalism in the Jeffersonian sense.

Non-whites and Jews each have their sections in TDM, and Robertson summarizes their history and presence in the US. The chapter on “The Negroes” is particularly interesting and highly recommended in light of current propaganda.

The clash

Perhaps the heart of TDM is what the author calls the “clash” of whites against minorities in every facet of American life. The cultural clash is the battle for the soul of the white man and includes art, religion, and education. Robertson names the Majority artist as the greatest casualty of dispossession. That is because great art comes from aristocracies within a dominant and homogenous group. He cites Homeric Greece, Augustan Rome, Elizabethan England, and Mozart’s Vienna as a few such examples. In contrast, art stagnates in multiracial and multicultural societies. What great art has polyglot New York City or Rio de Janeiro produced in modern times?

The Temple of Hephaestus at the Agora of Athens, built 449–415 BC (Credit Image: Guillaume Piolle via Wikimedia)
The Temple of Hephaestus at the Agora of Athens, built 449–415 BC (Credit Image: Guillaume Piolle via Wikimedia)

What does this mean for the Majority artist?

The communications media and principal academic forums being largely closed to him, the Majority artist has no adequate defense against the blistering minority assaults on his culture. He must avoid praising his own people as a people — and he must avoid castigating other peoples, particularly the more dynamic minorities. The minority artist, on the other hand, wears no such cultural straitjacket. He freely praises who he likes and freely damns whom he dislikes, both as individuals and as groups. The Majority artist, with a narrower choice of heroes and villains, has a narrower choice of theme. Lacking the drive and brute force of minority racism, Majority art tends to become bland, innocuous, emotionless, sterile, and boring.

In the political clash, Robertson examines democracy, conservatism, and liberalism. He calls democracy “the most utopian and most quixotic” of political forms and notes that it works only when it is the rule of a people — not several different peoples. Liberalism was the means by which minorities took power in the US. But if liberals are hypocrites — Robertson calls them the “bigoted enemy of bigotry” — what are conservatives?

Conservatives in the 1970s — and now — were classical liberals. Robertson calls them “probably the most effective of all Americans in keeping the Majority in the deep freeze of racial apathy.”

Aug 7, 1970 – Richard Nixon with President Mobutu of the Congo. (Credit Image: © Keystone Press Agency / ZUMA Wire)
Aug 7, 1970 – Richard Nixon with President Mobutu of the Congo. (Credit Image: © Keystone Press Agency / ZUMA Wire)

TDM claims that America does have a legitimate conservative tradition, even in the realm of race (men such as Lothrop Stoddard and Madison Grant). World War II and the Great Depression nearly wiped out all authentic American conservatism, resulting in Conservatism, Inc. See if this doesn’t sound familiar:

Before he was allowed a national platform, the modern conservative had to demonstrate that he was a member of the loyal opposition, that on the “sensitive” issues he was of one mind with the liberal himself. No public manifestation of classical conservatism — i.e., no forthright attack against democracy and minority racism — would be tolerated. If the fires of minority illiberalism and minority racism could not be quenched by modest, low-decibel appeals for decorum, they were to be left raging. The only notes of dissention permitted the modern conservative were the safe ones. He could be more reverent toward big business, property, patriotism, religion, government decentralization, and law and order. He could be more critical of socialism, Marxism, Castro, overregulation, labor unions, and budget deficits. But the permissible differences were differences in degree, not in kind. On the larger issues, the issues behind the issues, modern liberalism and modern conservatism were often becoming synonymous.

Robertson discusses economic and fiscal policy in ways that are certainly relevant today. He believed that the only way to measure an economy is by how it provides for its people. Race is an indispensable part of economics:

Fiscal policies are not the expressions of or trademarks of an economic system. They are the expressions of how different peoples measure the input they expect to give society and the output they expect to receive. When the workforce in Detroit was of European descent, the American automobile industry led the world in motor car production. As the workforce darkened, as accountants, attorneys, and government regulators replaced entrepreneurs and engineers as CEOs, the lead passed to the Germans and Japanese.

A fascinating footnote in the economic section mentions the French anthropologist Vacher de Lapouge. In 1899, he predicted the rise and fall of a Third Reich, absolute socialism in Russia, and a contest for world supremacy between Russia and America that would be won by the US due to a higher percentage of Nordics.

The section on the legal clash examines how whites have been dispossessed through the justice system. Minorities make up an increasing percentage of both law makers and law breakers. Trials by jury — particularly if they involve black jurors deciding on crimes between blacks and whites — have shown the weakness of the US legal system since at least the 1960s, and continue to make a mockery of the rule of law today.

Jan 28, 1997: Demonstrations in front of the courthouse building in Santa Monica, California, during OJ Simpson’s Civil Trial. (Credit Image: © Jonathan Alcorn via ZUMA Wire)
Jan 28, 1997: Demonstrations in front of the courthouse building in Santa Monica, California, during OJ Simpson’s Civil Trial. (Credit Image: © Jonathan Alcorn via ZUMA Wire)

Robertson writes that the judiciary is most responsible for white dispossession because it was easier to infiltrate the nine seats on the Supreme Court than to out-vote or out-legislate a 90-percent-white electorate. Robertson has particular contempt for Justices Earl Warren, Hugo Black, and William Douglas, who “split in the ranks” of the Majority. What was once the most respected American institutions had fallen by 1972. TDM’s section on the legal clash is so full of shady dealings and unethical behavior of Supreme Court justices that you probably won’t look at our legal system the same way after reading it.

Court rulings against whites in all the civil rights cases have massively reordered American life for the Majority, but so has crime. As Robertson writes, “Criminal justice was originally intended to protect society from the lawbreaker. By the time the Warren Court had finished with it, its chief function was to protect the lawbreaker from society. Needless to say, the Court’s exaggerated magnification of criminal rights worked directly to the advantage of minorities that shelter criminal castes within their ranks.” He recounts statistics and horrifying examples of whites killed by black criminals and notes that blacks often do not think they are criminals, but soldiers in a race war.

The section on the racial clash ends with a discussion of foreign policy — which no longer serves whites. Robertson gives an overview of American foreign policy disasters through the 20th century and writes, “Not only America but most of the world has lived to regret the day the Majority lost control of American foreign policy.”

Nov 30, 2005 – Husaybah, Iraq – American marines await the arrival of the Iraqi Defense Minister Saadoun al-Dulaimi. (Credit Image: © Sean Smith / eyevine / ZUMA Press)
Nov 30, 2005 – Husaybah, Iraq – American marines await the arrival of the Iraqi Defense Minister Saadoun al-Dulaimi. (Credit Image: © Sean Smith / eyevine / ZUMA Press)

The concluding section of TDM offers a possible solution. Whites must reject all aspects of liberalism. It was through this ideology that, “the laboriously accumulated privileges of Majority institutions were distributed gratis to members of other races and cultures, who accepted them as a matter of course, often with a show of ingratitude, and then used them for purposes entirely different from those for which they had been intended.” Some prominent whites had spoken out but were brushed aside as cranks because racially aware whites controlled no institutions and had no nationwide forums of expression.

The author offers a somewhat vague idea of a “Northern European ingathering” as a way to stop white dispossession worldwide. This would be “not merely a political and economic clustering cemented by military alliances but an ingathering of race consciousness, the most lasting and tenacious of all social binding forces.” Robertson admits it would be a huge task — not even the British or Roman empires achieved this — but it would be powerful enough to advance the interests of whites as a race. What if our dispossession were not halted?

“History is insistent on pointing out that when the dominant population group goes, the country goes. As is daily becoming more apparent, the dying fall of the American Majority is the dying fall of America itself.”

The censorship of silence

The book jacket biography of Wilmot Robertson notes that “the author waited for decades for a qualified Majority scholar to write this book. Having waited in vain, he decided to take on this project himself and devoted ten years to it.” But he also took on printing, promotion and distribution. Even in 1972, no mainstream publisher would touch such a dissident work. In 1974, Robertson published a second book called Ventilations which has a chapter on the hoops he had to jump through to get TDM into the hands of readers.

The author sent out 483 review copies but netted only three reviews: one newspaper, the Charleston Evening Post, one academic journal, Mankind Quarterly, and one conservative publication, Modern Age, which offered an ambivalent review. Libraries often rejected free copies. Book stores refused to stock TDM, even on consignment. Conservative outlets were as useless 50 years ago as they are today. Human Events and National Review refused ads as did American Rifleman and the John Birch Society’s American Opinion. Despite censorship, TDM managed to sell 16,000 copies in its first two years.

The author went on to start an underground newsletter on race called Instauration (1975–2000), which occasionally gave updates on TDM. By 1976, over 25,000 copies had been sold. The following is from the May 1977 issue of Instauration:

Bloomington, Indiana: The Alternative [which would later become The American Spectator] is a small-circulation publication that prides itself on its independence. Recently it received a very friendly write-up in Time. Crossing our fingers, we ordered a full-page ad in The Alternative for The Dispossessed Majority. A few days later we received the following communication from Ronald E. Burr, a member of the magazine’s staff: ‘We are offended by the racist nature of the Howard Allen advertisement [the name of Robertson’s company] and we will not run it in our publication.’

Mentioning TDM was dangerous even for top-rated talk radio hosts. The following is a dispatch from the March 1979 issue:

Bob Grant, who read some paragraphs from The Dispossessed Majority over radio station WOR some time ago, was suddenly fired from his job last November. He was informed that the cause was ‘economic.’ This is hard to believe, since Grant’s was the top-rated late night show in the New York metropolitan area. ‘Maybe someday I’ll find out it was some particular group that did me in,’ said the fallen microphone idol.

Instauration subscribers often sent the book to students at top private schools, which invariably provoked panicked newspaper articles and local TV news reports. The author encouraged this sort of guerrilla advertising and it no doubt helped spread the word.

Surprisingly, Amazon sells TDM. The promotional page says the book sold 150,000 copies. Though I have been unable to confirm this, it appears that TDM is more popular than ever. The Unz Review offers a free copy of the e-book on its website. There have been several recent podcasts devoted to TDM and Wilmot Robertson (see here, and here). Popular dissident right podcaster Scott Greer recently announced that he is dedicating an upcoming episode to an analysis of TDM. How many underground books are still being sold, discussed, and debated 50 years after they were first published? F. Roger Devlin says that none other than Sam Francis called the work, “his own generation’s authoritative statement of racial nationalism.”

It is fortunate for us that Wilmot Robertson undertook such a massive undertaking instead of waiting for a more established scholar to write a book defending the American majority. The Dispossessed Majority is a classic work that pulls no punches about America’s decline. The author would no doubt be proud that so many whites are waking up to the disaster we face and are starting to speak and act against our dispossession, especially since so few did so in his own lifetime. If whites are able to salvage something of the historic American nation, we will owe a huge debt of gratitude to Wilmot Robertson.

(Republished from American Renaissance by permission of author or representative)
 
Hide 192 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. Chris Moore says: • Website

    The TDM put great importance on the of the role of Jews in white dispossession. Indeed, a central theme of the book is that a hostile Jewish elite had displaced the old WASP elite starting in the 1930s. Robertson’s discussion of the Boazian school’s takeover of anthropology, for example, emphasizes the number of Jews who were part of that movement. Many members of the old WASP establishment went along with and enabled new elites. Robertson even has terms for them: Gracchites are rich whites who advance their careers and fortunes by catering to minorities, an example being Franklin Roosevelt. Pussyfooters are whites — often lawyers, scientists, professors, or small newspaper editors — who know the score but keep quiet instead of speaking up for their people. Old Believers believed or pretended to believe in old fashioned American liberalism in the Jeffersonian sense.

    I just call them ((Jew))-stooges. But how long has this type of person been around? Since Judas. Before that, the Golden Calf reprobates terminated by Moses…

    Robertson’s book opened my eyes to the ((Jewish)) agenda some 30 years ago. But the Judas Class has since opened my eyes to the fact that there is a shamelessly greedy, soulless and sociopathic subset of the human race that simply can’t be reformed. That subset has coalesced today as ((Jews)) and ((Jew))-stooges.

    • Agree: CSFurious
  2. Ron Unz says:

    I’ll take this opportunity to try to correct some crucial misinformation regarding the 1965 Immigration Act that WN-types have been bitterly complaining about for at least three decades. Here are a few relevant paragraphs from one of my 2019 articles:

    The dismal state of factual misinformation widespread within the anti-immigration community is best illustrated by a single striking example. Among such individuals, no piece of American legislation is as fiercely condemned as the 1965 Hart-Celler Immigration Act, routinely denounced as the law that destroyed our country by opening the floodgates to the influx of countless millions of non-white Third Worlders, thereby dooming America to eventual white-minority status…

    Unfortunately, all these individuals have the facts exactly backwards and upside-down. The 1965 Act didn’t OPEN America’s borders, instead it largely CLOSED America’s borders.

    The history is very simple. Prior to the 1920s, America allowed unlimited immigration from Europe and Latin America. Then the 1924 Immigration Act sharply restricted European immigration, but retained an “open borders” policy toward Latin America and the rest of the Western Hemisphere, largely because Southwestern business interests desired an unrestricted supply of Mexican labor. This only changed with the 1965 Act, which for the first time imposed strict quotas upon immigration from Latin America and the Caribbean even as it loosened restrictions upon European and Asian immigration. Prior to 1965, any Latin American who paid a small fee at the border, generally in the range of \$18, could legally immigrate to America with almost no waiting period. Immigration had remained low merely because Mexico and most of Latin America had traditionally been under-populated.

    The huge rise in Latin American immigration after 1965 was due to the enormous population growth in that region and came in spite of the 1965 Act rather because of it.

    https://www.unz.com/runz/immigration-building-a-wall-and-hispanic-crime/

    In support of my analysis, I just took a quick look at the updated 1981 edition of the Wilmot Robertson book and confirmed that across the 600 pages he devoted only a couple of paragraphs to the 1965 Immigration Act. He obviously agreed it had almost nothing to do with the “dispossession” of white America that was the entire subject of his book.

    Sometimes blatant factual errors can become endemic in an ideological community and prove very difficult to correct. But continuing to promote them destroys the credibility of their advocates.

  3. @Ron Unz

    There were older Acts that made the U.S.A. less White:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_Brides_Act
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luce%E2%80%93Celler_Act_of_1946

    Anyway, Mr Unz is wrong about Hispanic crime¹, so I don’t trust his take regarding the Hart-Celler Act. However (!), to my knowledge, no White Nationalist (or VDARE.com type) has even tried to refute Unz’ take on the Hart-Celler Act thus far (that’s telling!), so… maybe Unz is right, after all‽

    1. https://emilkirkegaard.dk/en/2022/03/the-unz-compositional-data-fallacy/

    • Replies: @Ron Unz
  4. If America continues to decline, it will be one of the most amazing and depressing stories ever told.

    Look, whites handed power and prestige to Jews who want to dispossess whites of identity, pride, history, meaning, and preservation.

    Whites did that. So, live with the consequences.

    If you place yourself in the mouth of an alligator, don’t complain if it swallows you.

    • Replies: @Zumbuddi
  5. KenH says:

    Robertson’s The Dispossessed Majority is outstanding and I was lucky to come across it in the mid 1990’s as I was racially awakening. It contained jolting and eyebrow raising facts about race and American history that were obviously being concealed from whites to preserve the post 1965 anti-white orthodoxy. The facts presented in this book were enthusiastically suppressed by Jews in media and book publishing and their goy allies for decades in order to misinform, mislead and denature whites which was a success until the internet age.

    Robertson’s last work titled The Ethnostate was written to inform whites that America was lost and could no longer be saved. America cannot be made great again due to the dramatic demographic transformation and a breakup of the American nation was probable. So he proposed preserving as much American territory as possible for the creation of white ethnostates where whites could regroup and live free from Jewish control and Jew and non-white hatred of whites.

  6. Bernie says:

    “the laboriously accumulated privileges of Majority institutions were distributed gratis to members of other races and cultures, who accepted them as a matter of course, often with a show of ingratitude, and then used them for purposes entirely different from those for which they had been intended.”

    Let this quote sink in.

    • Replies: @mulga mumblebrain
  7. According to the paper “Theodore G. Bilbo and the Decline of Public Racism, 1938-1947” so-called ‘racism’ was already declining in the U.S.A. before the ’50s, let alone the ’60s…

  8. Ron Unz says:
    @Vergissmeinnicht

    However (!), to my knowledge, no White Nationalist (or VDARE.com type) has even tried to refute Unz’ take on the Hart-Celler Act thus far (that’s telling!), so… maybe Unz is right, after all‽

    Actually, I think 90% of the more prominent WN/VDare types are perfectly aware that I’m correct. After all, I began pointing out the facts to them about a dozen years ago, and they gradually stopped emphasizing the 1965 Immigration Act around that time, though they still sometimes vaguely denounce it. The problem they face is that 90% of their followers/supporters are not aware, and they’re always ranting about the 1965 Act, which puts pressure on them to do the same. Meanwhile, admitting that they’d been wrong for 20-30 years on such a fundamental issue would severely damage their credibility.

    Anyway, Mr Unz is wrong about Hispanic crime¹

    Nope, I’m 100% correct about that as well, and that Kirkegaard fellow is just incompetent.

    • Agree: Bardon Kaldian
    • Thanks: Jim Christian
    • Replies: @Ferrari
  9. Had Abraham Lincoln not been a homicidal maniac, the 600,000 Whites killed in the Civil War would have come to about 10,000,000 people today with only modest population growth per year. I’m glad someone recognizes the Civil War’s role in the dispossession.

    • Agree: Jim Christian
    • Replies: @follyofwar
  10. @Reverend Goody

    Calling it a Civil War is a misnomer. A civil war is when both sides fight over who controls the central government. The South only wanted to peacefully secede, as was their right under the Constitution, a document which bloodthirsty Lincoln, the worst president in US history (at least until the Biden Regime), utterly destroyed.

    The correct word is either The War of Northern Aggression or the War for Southern Independence. Take your pick. But a civil war it was not.

    • Agree: Sam Hildebrand
    • Replies: @Observator
  11. @follyofwar

    I thought the south seceded because their party lost the presidential election, which kind of looks like losing one part of the control of the national government they had enjoyed almost continuously since 1789. They still held the Senate and the Supreme Court but the barons of the old south had hated democracy right from the start. The infamous John Calhoun stated as much to a fellow Congressman at the start of the 1812 session, “I admit your conclusions in respect to us Southrons — that we are essentially aristocratic. I cannot deny but we can and do yield much to democracy; this is our sectional policy. We are from necessity thrown upon and solemnly wedded to that party, however it may occasionally clash with our feelings, for the conservation of our interests. It is through our affiliation with that party in the middle and western States we control, under the Constitution, the governing of the United States; but when we cease thus to control this nation through a disjointed democracy, or any material obstacle in that party which shall tend to throw us out of that rule and control, we shall then resort to the dissolution of the Union.”

    • Replies: @Chrlotte NC Bill
  12. A. Clifton says: • Website

    Re-segregation…. it’s in the Bible @ Isaiah 13:14, but most importantly

    @ Matthew 13:39-43.

    now axe yo ‘self……how dat gonna happen ?

  13. Ferrari says:
    @Ron Unz

    Have you addressed Kirkegaard’s argument somewhere Ron? I’d be interested in hearing your take on it.

    • Replies: @Ron Unz
    , @Ummm
  14. Ron Unz says:
    @Ferrari

    Have you addressed Kirkegaard’s argument somewhere Ron? I’d be interested in hearing your take on it.

    I’d published my articles in 2010 and 2013, and they’re provoked an enormous amount of controversy and debate all across the Internet at the time. But apparently that incompetent crank Kirkegaard had paid absolutely no attention, but then in 2022 published a ridiculous blog post denouncing my analysis. I hardly find it worthwhile to respond at such a late date, especially since nearly all the smarter rightwingers have long since concluded I was correct (when was the last time you saw rightwingers focusing on Hispanic crime?).

    However, I just now glanced at his stupid blog post, sure enough, he obviously didn’t read my articles carefully since he entirely misinterpreted my analysis.

    I never claimed that Hispanics have crime rates much lower than that of whites of the same age, merely that the rates are roughly comparable. He then noted that the crime rates are overwhelmingly dominated by the black percentages and seems to suggest that I was covering up that fact:

    Anyway, we see that there is now no evidence of Hispanic% being negatively associated with crime rate. That conclusion was a mistake based on the confounding factor of Black%. The strong dominance of Black% is also seen in Unz’ figures

    However, here’s what I had written in my own article:

    To some extent, this surprising possibility is merely a statistical syllogism. Whenever the correlation to a single factor approaches unity, no other non-equivalent item may have a large, independent impact. And failing to recognize the existence of such a single, overwhelming factor might lead us to misidentify numerous other spurious influences, whose apparent causal importance actually derives from their own correlations with the primary item. For many years, the black connection to local crime has been so strong as to almost eliminate the possible role of any other variable.

    https://www.unz.com/runz/race-and-crime-in-america/

    What I demonstrated was that the black correlation to crime rates totally swamped all other factors. Kirkegaard merely restated the same conclusion a decade later.

    • Agree: Sam Hildebrand
    • LOL: eah
    • Replies: @Vergissmeinnicht
    , @anon
    , @eah
  15. @Ron Unz

    Doesn’t matter, for White Nationalists, even if ‘Latino crime’ is close to that of Whites – Mestizos still perform worse at other ‘civilisational’ metrics than Whites: out-of-wedlock births, STDs, Welfare usage, you name it…

    But, in any case, that Brown/Black people score lower than Whites at IQ tests is not a good argument for White Nationalism – but can we really blame the WNs for that? Thing is: WNs are being robbed of their Freedom of Association! So their reaction is simply NATURAL: Fighting back a waaay STRONGER ‘enemy’ can only be done if WNs increase their influence. “How to achieve that?” By convincing ‘normies’ of their ideas. “How?” By making all kind of arguments! Whether good (‘Hey, Freedom of Association should be inviolable’), bad (‘The US is screwed up due to that 1965 Immigration Act!’) or irrelevant (‘Blacks have lower IQs’).

  16. Pixo says:
    @Ron Unz

    The big problem now is asylum law. Show up at the border, claim asylum, and get released for 5+ years while the government investigates and usually rejects the fraudulent claim. Then just take a new identity or go semi-underground. Or you then begin a new process of delaying removal, getting a marriage visa, getting an amnesty, getting a humanitarian exception because now you have “US citizen” children.

    In 2021, about 800,000 asylum claimants were “caught and released” at the Mexico border. The waves of young arab men who invaded Germany under Merkel were also asylum claims.

    In terms of numbers, asylum is similar to work visas. But US work visas tend to go to law-abiding, high IQ, low fertility Asians, and to a small extent similar people from Europe and South America. Asylum goes to undesirable groups from Subsaharan Africa, Central America, Haiti, the worst parts of the former USSR, and MENA.

    • Agree: eah
  17. anonymous[314] • Disclaimer says:
    @Ron Unz

    Regarding alleged 1924-1965 ‘open borders’ for Mexicans and Latinos in the USA –

    There is yet the fact that in 1953-54, the Dwight Eisenhower administration pulled off ‘Operation Wetback’, deporting an official 1.1 million Mexicans and Latinos back south over the border (number deported is contested by various parties) … Eisenhower uniquely pulled off what Trump couldn’t ‘they have to go back’

    And regarding the alleged ‘nothingburger’ nature of the 1965 Hart-Celler Act, there is yet the fact that just before that Act, the USA achieved its peak of European-heritage whiteness at about 90% … associated with its greatest period of working-class prosperity. It was all downhill both in terms of whiteness and working class incomes after that.

    Correlation is not causation, of course, but hmmm …

    (At USA founding in 1783-89 it was only about 75% white due to the number of black slaves, this had increased to about 85% by 1860 … circa 1960 was the top)

    • Replies: @Ron Unz
  18. Ron Unz says:
    @anonymous

    There is yet the fact that in 1953-54, the Dwight Eisenhower administration pulled off ‘Operation Wetback’, deporting an official 1.1 million Mexicans and Latinos back south over the border (number deported is contested by various parties) … Eisenhower uniquely pulled off what Trump couldn’t ‘they have to go back’

    That’s another thing that had confused people. Prior to 1965, any Mexican who paid something like \$18 and waited a couple of days for processing could legally immigrant to the US, but Mexicans back then were very poor and impatient and since no one seriously enforced our immigration laws, most of them just walked across the border illegally. Usually nobody cared, but every couple of decades America had an economic recession, so the government would round up and deport all the illegals. That happened under Eisenhower and it had earlier happened under FDR during the 1930s.

    I can’t spend any more time replying to comments on this, so people interested should just read my most recent article:

    https://www.unz.com/runz/immigration-building-a-wall-and-hispanic-crime/

    • Thanks: Bubba
  19. KenH says:
    @Ron Unz

    The 1965 Act didn’t OPEN America’s borders, instead it largely CLOSED America’s borders.

    I hope you aren’t arguing that the 1965 act had nothing to do with America’s sweeping demographic changes since that time. Virtually every pundit and every journal on the right and the left admits that it has changed America’s racial composition. They only argue whether the change is good or not so good.

    You always point to technicalities that WN’s or pro-whites may have gotten wrong in describing the act which you think is discrediting when their/our point is that the 1965 immigration act radically changed the racial makeup of the incoming immigrants to favor non-whites by a large margin so that today only 13-14% of immigrants are from Europe and Canada while almost 51% are from Mexico and Latin America and 27% from Asia.

    Prior to the 1965 Hart-Cellar act almost 85% of immigrants hailed from Europe and Canada and only 9.5% from Mexico and Latin America.

    https://www.history.com/news/immigration-act-1965-changes

    The 1965 Hart-Cellar only closed the border to whites from Europe and Canada while opening the borders to non-whites and merely setting caps on immigration levels from Mexico and Latin America which have since been greatly expanded.

    • Replies: @Ron Unz
    , @Anon
  20. Trinity says:

    Will always remember my uncle telling me the story about the German prisoner he encountered while serving in Europe during World War II. My uncle said that the German prisoner said that one day America/Americans would realize that they fought on the wrong side. This was during the early seventies when my uncle told me this story so it was the same time period mentioned. Where were you in ’72? Hehe.

    Was my uncle very Jew wise? Probably not but anyone with a pulse could see America was heading in the wrong direction by the mid 1960s much less the early seventies. If I am not mistaken a Black lady even ran for President in ’72. Blacks slaughtering Whites in San Francisco or Black Panthers writing “critically acclaimed” books that talk about raping White women. Some Whites like yours truly attending “skoo” with lots of Blacks for the first time. Serial killers, Charlton Heston kissing some Black broad in the movies, White flight, etc., the mid 1960’s and early 1970’s amped up America’s decline a notch or two and it has been downhill ever since. Probably no Cohencidence that this is the time period when those, “Planet Of The Apes” movies hit the screen.

    Billy Graham/Nixon tapes also during this time. Hmmm.

  21. Trinity says:

    Lots of blaxploitation films during the dawn of the fall of traditional America. Jim Brown as a cowboy no less bedding Raquel Welch in some stupid movie, “they call me Mr. Tibbs,” Shaft, Pam Greir sho nuff kicking White female asses and driving White men crazy. Haha. Pam always looked like a tranny to me but only in (((Hollywood))) is a Black female going to be sexy to the average bear or White male.

    In 2022, it’s far worse. Blacks are all over the place on the small and big Jew screen. In 1972 a Black male & White female couple were uber rare and would turn heads, now almost every (((television commercial))) features Black and White couples in the reel world. While the real world is not as bad as the (((reel world))) it is still much, much, much worse than 1972 when it comes to interracial couples. Homersexuals in 1972? In 1972 homosexuality was still considered a mental illness. In 2022 one can see males kissing each other on daytime television.

    Did America fight on the wrong side during World War II? Only a moron would say no.

    • Agree: Druid55, Bookish1
  22. Ron Unz says:
    @KenH

    I hope you aren’t arguing that the 1965 act had nothing to do with America’s sweeping demographic changes since that time. Virtually every pundit and every journal on the right and the left admits that it has changed America’s racial composition. They only argue whether the change is good or not so good.

    Yes, that’s exactly what I mean. The 1965 Act did reopen America to immigration from Asia and Europe, but had absolutely nothing to do with the large influence from Latin America or the Caribbean, which has been the overwhelming majority of non-white immigration over the last couple of generations. Indeed, if not for the 1965 Act, a vastly larger number of Hispanics would have immigrated here legally, so America would very likely have become majority non-white in the 1990s rather than in 2040 or whenever.

    Just read my article and you’ll see that the facts are absolutely clear.

    https://www.unz.com/runz/immigration-building-a-wall-and-hispanic-crime/

    Or just consider The Dispossessed Majority by Wilmot Robertson, which is the subject of this article. Everyone on the racialist right agrees that Robertson’s book was the founding ur-text of modern American White Nationalism, and Robertson spent ten years writing it. His entire theme was the “dispossession” of American whites, and the updated 1981 edition of his book is 600 pages long. Yet he only devotes two paragraphs to the 1965 Act, because he knew perfectly well that it had absolutely no connection to “white dispossession” he was decrying.

    Because of my informational efforts over the last dozen years, I think all the leading racialist writers have gradually become aware of the huge mistake they’d previously made, but they’re obviously very embarrassed to publicly say anything lest they look ridiculous. So individuals such as yourself are still kept confused on the issue.

    • Replies: @KenH
  23. KenH says:
    @Ron Unz

    Yes, that’s exactly what I mean. The 1965 Act did reopen America to immigration from Asia and Europe, but had absolutely nothing to do with the large influence from Latin America or the Caribbean,

    The 1965 immigration act did not reopen immigration from Europe. It largely closed it. European and Canadian immigration to the U.S. began dropping precipitously due to the 1965 immigration act and only stands at barely 14% today.

    Yet he only devotes two paragraphs to the 1965 Act, because he knew perfectly well that it had absolutely no connection to “white dispossession.”

    Not sure what version you have but Robertson devotes nearly all of chapter 6 titled “non-white immigration” to the 1965 immigration act and its negative impact on white demographics. It’s also mentioned near the end of the preceding chapter titled “white immigration”.

    His entire theme was the “dispossession” of American whites…Yet he only devotes two paragraphs to the 1965 Act, because he knew perfectly well that it had absolutely no connection to “white dispossession.”

    This is an erroneous claim. First you seem to be disputing that American whites are being dispossessed when by almost every measure they are then you assume/claim without any evidence that Robertson “knew perfectly well” that the 1965 immigration act had no connection to white dispossession. Can you read his mind? Do you have any statements by him where he admits that the 1965 immigration act disfavoring white Europeans and Canadians has played no role in white dispossession.

    Robertson probably did not devote more space to the subject because when the 1981 version was published America was still about 80% white, overall immigration levels were much lower than today and the non-white invasion was not very noticeable other than in the major urban centers.

    • Replies: @Ron Unz
  24. When Unz writers give more of a damned about saving the human race from transhumanism than saving the white race from it’s own desire to supposedly kill itself off due to whatever group one chooses to blame it on (considering blacks are murdering blacks far faster than whites are being replaced and considering most Hispanics are partially descended from whites)…let me know. Since when did Unz put whites above everyone else (oh and I happen to be white….)? Sheesh! And another thing: it’s not a war on whites, it’s a war on CHRISTIANS….it’s just that most Christians on this planet just happen to be white, which is why it’s whites being attacked–by a certain group of folks who hate Jesus Christ, and we all know whom that group is…. Revelation 2:9 and 3:9 reveal this group.

    • Replies: @Sollipsist
    , @Trinity
  25. Ron Unz says:
    @KenH

    The 1965 immigration act did not reopen immigration from Europe. It largely closed it. European and Canadian immigration to the U.S. began dropping precipitously due to the 1965 immigration act and only stands at barely 14% today.

    No. The provisions of the 1965 Act: (A) opened immigration from Asia; (B) for the first time sharply restricted immigration from Latin America and the Caribbean; and (C) reopened immigration from Europe, while shifting the various European quotas. The reason European immigration didn’t increase is that Western Europe had become prosperous by that time while Eastern Europe was under Soviet control. If the same changes had been made in 1950, there would have been a huge wave of European immigration.

    Not sure what version you have but Robertson devotes nearly all of chapter 6 titled “non-white immigration” to the 1965 immigration act and its negative impact on white demographics. It’s also mentioned near the end of the preceding chapter titled “white immigration”.

    I’m looking at the Third Revised Edition published in 1981. The only discussion of the 1965 Immigration Act appears on p. 50, with some carryover to p. 51. So we’re talking about a single page or so in Robertson’s 600 page volume. The book is about “white dispossession” and obviously the 1965 Act was an extremely minor aspect of the overall issue.

  26. If you want to have fun with history and baffle idiots, tell them Biden’s Juneteenth holiday, that he alone created, is defined as:

    Juneteenth is a federal holiday in the United States commemorating the emancipation of enslaved African Americans.

    This occurred shortly after the Civil war ended when the Union army entered Texas and posted an order freeing slaves in Texas. However, slavery in the USA did not end on that day. Delaware and Kentucky rejected all efforts by their Union to end slavery. As a result, slavery remained perfectly legal in both states for another six months after Juneteenth, until the US secretary of state certified that the 13th Amendment had been ratified by enough states to become law throughout the U.S.

    http://www.tracingcenter.org/blog/2016/06/where-in-the-u-s-did-slavery-still-exist-after-juneteenth/

    But no one is allowed to discuss Union slave states, aka border states, because this war between the states has been transformed into a war to free the slaves. It is impossible to explain why slave states in the Union sent their militias to free slaves in other states.

    • Thanks: Biff
  27. @omegabooks

    More Christians on this planet are brown, black or Asian.

    Whites lost the majority a few decades ago, largely due to greater missionary success in poor countries, versus declining religious affiliation and activity in every single majority white country. Whites simply tended to become more secular as they became more affluent and educated, first in Europe and then in the US.

    Indeed, the discrepancy between stated religion and actual church attendance shows that Europe’s white population was already largely Christian in name only by the early- to mid-20th Century.

    The US maintained for several more decades due to the momentum provided by the Great Awakening/Evangelical movements and the influx of Catholic immigrants from the late 19th/early 20th Century. However, the country’s share of world Christianity due to overall population kept dropping steadily. The only denomination that saw significant growth among whites (intermittently) was the Mormons, and even there it was eclipsed by growth among non-whites at home and abroad.

  28. Ghali says:

    Let’s be honest and civilised, every American (elite) knows that Jews destroyed America. Forget about Blacks and Eskimos, etc. Jews and their Latino and Indian servants are guilty of wanton destruction of the USA.

  29. Ummm says:
    @Ferrari

    To me, looking at Kierkegaards numbers, he misses something vital.

    Crime rates *per 100,000 residents*.

    What percentage of incarcerated hispanics are not residents? That’s the 99 dollar question that unfortunately statistics can’t answer, since they don’t actually record the numbers.

    Some time ago I had a long argument on Twitter (before my inevitable ban for the same argument) regarding criminality and race, and, of course someone came out shouting about poverty.

    I found a very interesting study (which regrettably I cannot find now) which compared education, poverty, and fatherlessness all against rates of violent crime. The authors of course missed that fatherlessness was the real factor, but, there was a clear connection.

    Hispanics had approximately the same educational status and worse poverty than blacks, but a higher rate of father involvement. Their rate of crime did not fit the poverty narrative, but it certainly seemed to follow the rate of father involvement.

    I would suggest that poverty and education moderate the effects of fatherlessness, although I doubt that anyone would do any serious research on this.

    I don’t think Ron is entirely incorrect in his analysis that the statistics are somewhat incorrect, however, I would bet dollars to donuts that as the single motherhood rate in hispanic communities has grown, so too has the violent crime rate in the same communities.

  30. Panadechi says:

    Meanwhile the white dispossession advances, day by day.,

  31. @Ron Unz

    Empires rise and fall, nothing new here. But when they decline and fall, alas, they have to find scapegoats. Blacks are blamed for being stupid and committing crimes, Mexicans for immigrating and having children, Jews for being smart and rich, Russians for Trump, Chinese for Huawei, etc. Many WNs delude themselves by forgetting the Power and Wisdom that is the ultimate source of European victory and success.

    Genesis 49:10 The sceptre shall not depart from Judah,
    Revelation 5:5 behold, the Lion of the tribe of Judah, the Root of David, hath prevailed
    I Cor. 1:24 But unto them which are called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God, and the wisdom of God.

  32. Alfred says:

    In the summer of ’69, I spent 4 months in the USA. I was in San Francisco, Los Angeles, Seattle, Anchorage, Kotzebue, Las Vegas, Phoenix, Flagstaff, Grand Canyon, Las Vegas, Houston, Palm Beach, DC and New York. It was an unforgettable experience. I saw the slums of Los Angeles and stayed in the best part of Westwood Village. The contrasts were amazing. I traveled by Greyhound between San Francisco and Los Angeles – for the last time. Most of the traveling was by plane thanks to a ticket I bought in London for \$150. It permitted unlimited travel by 10 domestic airlines for 2 weeks. I used it for a month as no one stamped the start date of my travels. 🙂

    Since 9/11, I have avoided the States. The writer of this book was remarkably prescient. I hope Russia remains a bastion of the White race. I no longer wish to visit my old abodes – Cairo, London, Athens, Sitges, Dublin, Amsterdam, Paris, Nice, Munich, Oslo, Melbourne and Cairns. In Australia, the African influence is tiny but the nihilism is overwhelming.

  33. Alfred says:

    Just let them try this in Turkey – where I took the photo above a few days ago. 🙂

    The Summer of Cultural Enrichment (Paul Joseph Watson)

  34. anon[254] • Disclaimer says:
    @Ron Unz

    Bullshit cherry-picking. The hundreds of thousands of Mexicans murdered along the border between the US and Mexico don’t get factored in to these rosy statistics about Hispanic “crime rates.” Yeah, right. Hispanics are very peaceful, law-abiding, and they never commit hundreds of thousands of torture rape dismemberment murders against mostly women or anything. That would be apostasy to say that. Even if it’s true. Which it is.

    • Agree: profnasty
    • Replies: @Anon
    , @Bill Jones
  35. Whites–let’s go back to WASPs of early 19th century–were always ambivalent about themselves and their place in the world, i.e. vis a vis Britain and Europe. I don’t think this ambivalence, which in many instances, bordered on an outright inferiority complex, has ever really disappeared. Ralph Waldo Emerson wrote that Americans had declared their political independence, but as far as culture was concerned–art, literature, music–America was still an appendage of Europe. He called for a culture that was created by and for Americans, and he almost certainly meant white (mostly male) Americans. Was this culture ever created? Well, some will point to Nathaniel Hawthorne or Herman Melville or Walt Whitman and a few others. Artists–well you have to wait a good long while–Jackson Pollock? Mark Rothko? But does America have a literature and a literary tradition in the way that the French, the English, the Germans, the Italians, the Spanish, the Russians have a literary tradition? Henry James thought that the only way he could really learn about literature–about the writing of literature–was to to go off to Paris and sit at the feet of Turgenev and Flaubert. Which he did and then went off to England to write his novels. Almost all set in Europe and he went on to renounce his American citizenship. As did T S Eliot. As did Ezra Pound, who could not stand his own countrymen. When it comes to pop culture, America has left its mark on the world–Hollywood movies, Mickey Mouse and Disneyland, rock and roll. But even these “cultural forms” are looking a bit dated of late. Now American culture turns on one thing only–its tech corporations, Google, Apple, Microsoft, Facebook, Amazon, etc. They are certainly a presence, but are they something that inspires or consoles or compels? Not a rhetorical question.

    • Replies: @ricpic
  36. “Even in 1972, conservatives knew something was wrong with America and were sounding the alarm: high taxes, too much regulation, lack of religion in schools, Marxism, unions, political corruption and loose morals.”

    But the one key element was missing from their analysis: Jews and their quest to takeover America which earnestly had begun on the eve of the WWII but now it’s time to pay the piper because it took only fifty years to complete their triumph. A day late and a dollar short … RIP!

  37. fnn says:

    I moved to a place that’s 99% Hispanic in 2003 and have no regrets, but I have to wonder why five of the seven world cities with the highest homicide rates are in Mexico and two are in Venezuela. I can understand Venezuela, but Mexico has the 11th largest economy in the world and is hardly dependent on the illegal drug trade.

  38. @Trinity

    It’s same on British TV. They’ve got blacks and Asians all over the screen and if someone complains that whites are becoming a minority they say they’re racist and that the immigrants are only a tiny minority of the population. Well is the media reflecting reality or not and if not why not? Shouldn’t the immigrants be a tiny minority on the screen to discourage people thinking (unrealistically) that they’re actually a majority?

  39. Zumbuddi says:
    @Priss Factor

    Look, if alligators threaten your identity, pride, history, meaning and preservation, don’t complain when alligator gets turned into boots.

    Or lampshades.

    • Replies: @Priss Factor
  40. The Dispossessed Majority, None Dare Call it Conspiracy plus the magazine Instauration helped explain to me in the 1980’s who were really pulling the strings in the world. I had wondered why things just didn’t seem to be right. As early as my teen years, I was listening to shortwave and heard Radio RSA from South Africa and wondered why the news from the South African government was different from what we were hearing about it in our own news. I later met South African expats who verified that what the South African shortwave station was saying was basically true and our own news media were lying about everything that was going on. After the handover of the SA government to the blacks in 1986, and knowing about black failure around the world, I could see the writing on the wall. As SA started to fail on all fronts, nothing that came after that surprised me. I think I will dig out my old copy of The Dispossessed Majority and re-read it.

  41. profnasty says:

    I recall a tv newsbyte, circe 2005, wherein a cutish 19yo, presumably illegal, Mexican male immigrant, looked into the camera and whimpered, “We just want to work.”
    Who could deny this Horace Greeley hero?
    I have no tribble accepting his kind on my country.
    Latest news stat. 75% of Mexicans in US are one some form of welfare.
    Nice.

    • Replies: @Poupon Marx
  42. Trinity says:
    @omegabooks

    I think it is obviously a war on Whites first and foremost. As another poster mentioned there are a great deal of Black and Brown Christians. White traitor trash who side with their oppressors will all be thrown under the bus when they are no longer useful. Won’t matter if the traitorous Whites are transgender, atheists, or traitorous straight Christian Zionist.

    Hoodwinked Christian Zionist are a problem to Whites not the Jew.

  43. I was recently in Dublin and it wasn’t as bad as in other West European capitals, with regard to the proportion of immigrants. There are some Africans and Asians but not so many, and there are also quite a few East European migrants and Ukrainian refugees. The Irish people are still some of the friendliest in the world, although I guess slightly less friendly than in your time there. If you want to be really shocked you should go to Brussels. I have never seen so many blacks and Arabs all over, in the city centre and all points outward. Even the smaller towns in Belgium have a fair share of migrants. I was in Brussels in the early 70s and there were hardly any blacks. I haven’t been to Paris recently so can’t say if it’s worse than Brussels. In fact I’ve never seen so many blacks and Arabs in one place outside of Africa as I saw in Brussels. I used to travel a fair bit around Western Europe in the 60s and 70s but it’s like another world now, demographically. I’m in Egypt now and I quite like it. You can rent property very cheaply in some nice locations, like say Sharm El Sheikh, and the cost of living isn’t high. I could see myself spending more time here in the sun as the fuel prices soar in Europe.

    Look at this

    https://www.sharmelsheikhrealestate.com/property-details/2089

    120 euros a month for a one bedroom apartment in a secure compound with a swimming pool.

    • Replies: @usNthem
  44. “What great art has polyglot New York City or Rio de Janeiro produced in modern times?”

    None! All art forms promoted are shit, shit, shit and the Jew is responsible for it.

  45. In reading an article like this one is forced to ask…………

    Does a culture/social behavior correlated to one’s identifiable racial make up?

    and……….if so, does this create a conflict within one race replicating the societal wide culture/behavioral attributes of another?

    and regardless of whatever side you fall on the above questions……….the problem is that it would never be permitted to be discussed or debated within the current sociopolitical environment of today.

    Which brings us to the unmentionable question of……

    …….why is that?

  46. Trinity says:

    Did not Lev (((Bronstein))) talk of using non whites against Whites long ago? If I can recall Trotsky/ Bronstein conceived nonwhites could be taught to hate Whites because White had either defeated non whites militarily, subjected them to colonialism, or were more successful economically.

    Hell, the Jew has oppressed nonwhites and Whites militarily, economically and through colonialism, America is the Jew’s largest colony. Wonder why Bronstein didn’t tell his nonwhite cohorts that the Jew is king of the oppressors?

  47. anonymous[251] • Disclaimer says:

    Yes, I’m 100% sure that TDM The Dispossessed Majority book was heavily censored banned in polite Conservative society in the 1970s, it’s been quasi underground since then and apparently selling very well.

    Another similar banned book is Jean Respail’s “The Camp of the Saints”

    I bought dozens of these COTS books to try to “Wake up White America”… the result was more of a Black Pill, head shaking, nodding that yeah it was true.

    Just shows how totally useless Conservative Inc was back then and still is now.

    George Lincoln Rockwell’s chapter “50 years of Failure” brutally describes the pointlessness, worthlessness of the Conservative Inc Sand Box.

    JR TPC

  48. Anon[382] • Disclaimer says:

    Mr Robertson was a great man. And prescient. I bought TDM in the mid 90s, and also subscribed to his monthly Instauration magazine. Had a few letters published in it too. There used to be an online archive of this magazine, but am having trouble finding it now. It was a must-read for racially-conscious whites, but has been defunct for some years now.

    When you get right down to it, the coming downfall of the US has only two root causes: jewish power and influence, and the changing demographics. Just those two issues will be the demise of everything great that White-Europeans toiled to create here. Very sad. And it was all avoidable.

  49. Corvinus says:

    “Whites — America’s founders and sustainers — were no longer in charge of the nation they had built. They were also being submerged by racially-conscious non-whites who could never assimilate into American life and would never put country before race.”

    Europeans, specifically those from the British Isles, were in largely responsible for colonizing. And today’s Americans would overwhelmingly agree it’s not about white people being in charge of our country, but it’s about competent citizens regardless of race being in positions of leadership. Of course, the author of this piece conveniently leaves out that certain European ethnic groups, like the Irish and Italians, were considered to be other than assimilable. So what changed, magic dirt?

    • Replies: @Automatic Slim
  50. @Ron Unz

    Ron, there is a big difference between European descended “Hispanics”. (anybody south of the American border) and the mixed (mestizo, mulatto) population. It is typical of the Indo-European and the indigenous admixture, and its societal manifestations.

    Your Hispanic population, I am not sure of from a sampling point of view. Many Hispanics are included as White for the Federal Census and other statistical tabulations. I have lived in working class Hispanic neighborhoods and worked alongside Hispanic “blue collar” workers. They were more law abiding, though less able to think abstractly than Whites, but significantly less unstable, and exhibiting less psychopathy than Negroes.

    There is a deep sociopathic streak that runs through a rather minor percentage of Mestizos BUT it is extreme in its inhumanity and Satan like rituals of death and evil deeds.

    There are other reasons for no equating “good” Hispanics with typical Whites, but those differences are more subtle, and without enumerating and exposition, everyone knows what they are. You won’t see them at the opera or art museums, etc.

    • Replies: @Gizmo880
  51. @profnasty

    I do. How did Russia and Eastern Europe fare from not importing low wage immigrants to “do the jobs the natives will not”? Russian Federation has 119 ethnicities and many different languages, but there is CENTRIPETAL FORCE that cuts across that, the shared culture and values of Slavic eco-system of a thousand years.

    We should have picked our own cotton, worked our factories, and hired our own to do all jobs. I favor immigration for equivalent people, that is, similar collective IQ and CQ (Civilization Factor aka the Poupon Factor) to the Indo-European. That means individual selection of Asians, Hindoos, and a sprinkling of other ethnicities. No Negroes, No Indigenous, No Jews, No Muslims.

  52. Trinity says:

    Traitorous White “elites” were the ones who really did the most damage in destroying this nation. The Woodrow Wilsons, the Franklin Roosevelts, the Joe Bidens, the Ted Kennedys, etc., sold this nation out and threw poor and working class Whites under the bus. The aforementioned cuckholds and those like them helped turn an overwhelmingly White America into the shithole we see today. Blackmailed or bought off by Jewish malcontents intent on usurping power from the White majority. Pedophiles, alcoholics, sexual deviants, pathological liars, etc., you name it, that is the ” elite” who gave this nation away. No normal people allowed in Washington.

    • Agree: usNthem, profnasty
    • Replies: @Dually
  53. Mike Tre says:

    Normally a paperback is around 20 bucks on Amazon. This book is 79 dollars and is supposedly out of print. That alone speaks volumes.

  54. nsa says:

    Happy Juneteenth Day everyone. But right in the middle of Pride Month? How come the homos get a whole month and the niggers only get a day? The answer is obvious…..most the homos are white and most the niggers are black. Dat raciss discrimernation…….

    • LOL: usNthem
    • Replies: @anon
    , @FowChee
  55. I’m already reading TDM.

    Great review/recommendation.

  56. Richard B says:

    If America continues to decline, it will be one of the most amazing and depressing stories ever told. The United States will have gone from almost absolute leadership of the world in the 20th century to just another mediocrity in a very short time.

    Great opening line. But it’s even worse than that. Though probably not an exact quote, it’s close enough. In his Democratic Vistas Walt Whitman wrote:

    The United States are destined either to surmount the history of Feudalism, or else prove the most tremendous failure of all time.

    So, the late great USA won’t simply devolve into just another mediocrity. It’s long since been that. Nor just one big Neofeudalism. It’s already there. No. It will become what it already is, the worst failure in the history of nations.

    Then again, it also has to be said, that its failure is in proporation to what was attempted. That’s what makes this one of the most amazing and depressing stories ever told.

  57. anon[109] • Disclaimer says:
    @nsa

    as disgusting as it is, all the focus (especially in cuckservative MAGA circles) on homos and trannies is a clever smokescreen by those same Jew-controlled cuckservatives to cover up the growing nigger plague. unlike the sexual perverts who will always be a small-number of the population, violent criminal nigger apes are numerous and breed like rats.

  58. FowChee says:
    @nsa

    Blacks have February for the whole month. Maybe they’re pissed they received the shortest month, so Whitey gave then another day off???? As if the SOB’s work!!

  59. usNthem says:
    @Commentator Mike

    I noticed the same thing in Lisbon – really shocked at the number of blacks. Of course they weren’t the typical American feral hood ape, but still, nothing I expected to see at all.

  60. Richard B says:
    @Ron Unz

    I’ll take this opportunity to try to correct some crucial misinformation regarding the 1965 Immigration Act that WN-types have been bitterly complaining about for at least three decades. Here are a few relevant paragraphs from one of my 2019 articles:

    Even if Mr. Unz is correct here, the WN-types he refers to have no institutional power or cultural control. And, as his excellent website helps make perfectly clear through a number of contributing writers and excellent library, Jews, or what one might refer to as Jewish Supremacy Inc. doesn’t simply have a lot of power in the West, it has complete control over its social institutions – all of them. And the fact that it will tolerate no obstacle to its perceived right to aboslute power is why it’s dispossessing the majority.

    That’s the point. Not simply the The 1965 Immigration Act.

    So why is he even bothering with WN-types? Perhaps for the same reason Israel exaggerates the nonexistent threat of Palestinians. Another people with no institutional power or cultural control. In spite of his willingness to criticize Jewish Supremacy Inc., and whether or not he supports Israel, could it be that being Jewish he simply can’t help himself in the sense that, like them, he always has to be right, whether he is or not?

    And, again, he might be right about the 1965 Immigration Act in regard to Latin America. But that’s not the point. And because it’s not it’s simply a diversionary tactic to deflect attention from the obvious fact that Jewish Supremacy Inc. Is using its power to literally dispose the majority.

    The dismal state of factual misinformation widespread within the anti-immigration community is best illustrated by a single striking example.

    This could be rewritten:

    The dismal state of factual distortion widespread within the pro-immigration community is best illustrated by a single striking assumption that mass immigration = social benefit.

    From this perspective perhaps a more fruitful conversation, or debate, would be how both sides define social benefit. But would both sides (outside of TUR) be heard?

    We already know the answer. The conversation, or debate, would never happen.
    What has happened is that the anti side has been demonized, pathologized and targetted for dispossesion for at least three decades (longer) and all in the name of Saving Our Democracy. They’ve also been smeared as WN-types whether they are or not.

    Meanwhile the pro side is left to celebrate its Pyrrhic Victory. A fact easily proven by the visible collapse of the social institutions their power controls.

    Sometimes blatant factual errors can become endemic in an ideological community and prove very difficult to correct. But continuing to promote them destroys the credibility of their advocates.

    True. But it’s also true that errors (which though everyone makes, not everyone can admit to) are often used to completely discredit the very credible aspects of what their opponents or enemies are advocating.

    • Thanks: Trinity
    • Replies: @Robert Dolan
  61. The Dispossessed Majority
    https://archive.org/details/dispossessedmajo0000robe

    My motto is “Try Before You Buy”, and this book can be read at the Archive dot Org site.

    What I found there was more than a little surprising. Mr. Wilmot Robertson (pen name of Humphrey Ireland) was – at the time of writing – clearly not an idiot. The text is very readable, and even perceptive and witty at times. If it wasn’t so pricey I’d consider buying it myself.

    Readers ought to understand that Mr. Robertson, despite his intelligence, had some serious gaps in his education. Chapter 38 (Nuclear Hypothesis) demonstrated his basic ignorance about both Science and Nuclear Realities. Example: a footnote claiming that A-Bomb technology would have remained out of reach of other nations except for the Communist Spies is silly. Similarly his belief that the larger warheads possessed by the Soviets gave them a huge advantage. Accuracy is far more important, for a 5-megaton explosion 4 miles away isn’t nearly as destructive to a target as a 2-kiloton bomb landing on the roof of the bunker.

    Regarding Isolationism, the man was just a gullible right-winger. Robertson may have served honorably as a US Army officer during WW2, but he knew nothing of “whole world” strategy.

    I attribute his racism to a number of factors. He was born and raised in what Blacks have called The Nadir, and would have been always aware of the themes of “dirty stupid n*****s”) Being no longer a young man at the time he wrote the Dispossessed book, he would have had the early onset of Curmudgeonism – “a state of mind, unwavering, unapologetic, and uninterested in what people think.”

    I suspect that Mr. Robertson was both bright and mentally flexible enough to have modified his views even in his late Fifties if he had encountered a non-racist of similar intelligence. That didn’t happen, and the mental rigidity continued to grow

    Read with an understanding of the Author’s appalling ignorance of a few important issues, this is a book which is definitely worth examining.

  62. Peter Bradley: “… racial classification goes back to at least the Bible, which divided mankind into three races. … But it was not until the early 20th century that a comprehensive theory of racial equality was developed. ”

    Typical dissembling Amren bullshit.

    The author wants to pretend that the Bible sets out a clear theory of race, and yet the Bible is also the source of the idea that mankind is all of “one blood” (Acts 17:26), which is another way of saying that all men are brothers, and that race is therefore an illusion. The NT develops this idea to an extreme.

    8 There is neither Jew nor Gentile, neither slave nor free, nor is there male and female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus.
    – Galatians 3:28

    If the OT fairy tale about Noah’s sons Shem, Ham, Japheth, giving rise to three races of man is a “racial classification”, then it is also true that the Bible’s fantasies about the insignificance of race are a “comprehensive theory of racial equality”. They have also been much more influential and destructive. They laid the indispensable cultural groundwork for the acceptance of Boasian ideas.

    • Agree: C.T.
    • Replies: @C.T.
    , @Crush Limbraw
  63. If you want to read a brief synopsis by Vox Day – https://crushlimbraw.blogspot.com/2017/05/the-man-who-destroyed-america-by-vox-day.html?m=0 – I archived it a few years ago. It simply summarizes the fact that assimilation of even the same race with different cultures takes time, if it ever occurs. Mostly it never occurs – it just muddles the soup.
    Added to that mix is the fact that our churches were converged, education corrupted, Hollywood culture becoming predominant – http://www.crushlimbraw.com – and you end up with America being transitioned into NOT-America.
    It’s just that simple!

  64. @Corvinus

    Corvinus said: ” Of course, the author of this piece conveniently leaves out that certain European ethnic groups, like the Irish and Italians, were considered to be other than assimilable. So what changed, magic dirt? ”

    The Irish and Italians that came to America were discriminated against and considered unassimilable due to various biases and little feuds that existed in Europe between them and English, Germans, and others. It was not based on any real significant flaws, in intelligence, work ethic, or inventiveness of Irish and Italians. And in fact, being fellow white Europeans, once they were given a chance they became major contributors to the building and betterment of America.

    We were already stuck with the blacks we brought over who have been a huge net drain on the country, and you could make the case that after 200 years, still have not assimilated very well and produce little of value, but much dysfunction. In more recent decades we have brought in millions of Hmong, Africans, middle-easterners. Mexicans and Central Americans, and others who show little sign of totally assimilating, and they are all groups that take more from America than they put in. Whites, most east Asians, and most from the Indian subcontinent are the only groups putting more into government coffers than taking out. Plus do varying degrees of invention and innovation.

    Demography is destiny. And no civilization or society can survive the loss of its founding race.

    • Agree: Twin Ruler
    • Replies: @Corvinus
  65. Ron Unz: “In support of my analysis, I just took a quick look at the updated 1981 edition of the Wilmot Robertson book and confirmed that across the 600 pages he devoted only a couple of paragraphs to the 1965 Immigration Act. He obviously agreed it had almost nothing to do with the “dispossession” of white America that was the entire subject of his book.”

    If you control-F for “1965 Immigration Act” you get two hits, both on page 50, but the discussion occupies more than a couple of paragraphs. Chapter 6 passim, as KenH said, and mentions on pages 46 and 212 also. Overall, his tone when discussing this change in immigration law is lugubrious, not dismissive. He appears to think it was just one more nail in America’s coffin.

    Ron Unz: “Sometimes blatant factual errors can become endemic in an ideological community and prove very difficult to correct. But continuing to promote them destroys the credibility of their advocates. ”

    Wholeheartedly agree with this. Amren articles are a source of many very harmful misconceptions, in my experience. They are particularly bad when touching on Christianity’s damaging effect, as shown in the abolitionism of the Civil War, and Jared Taylor’s misguided admiration for Lincoln and his brilliant so-called “plan” to get the negroes to leave the USA by asking them politely (LOL!). Whether this is just pandering on Taylor’s part, or whether this refusal to assess Christianity’s responsibility for America’s problems stems from something deeper is an interesting question. You can’t tell a man something he doesn’t want to hear, nor can you show him something he doesn’t want to see. He’ll just cover his ears and his eyes. Perhaps this is why this kind of indictment is also missing from Robertson’s book TDM. I find it curious that Robertson, who seems to see clearly the destructive effect of what he calls “social Christianity” in the 20th century, doesn’t say much about the Christian motivations of the abolitionists in the 19th. If it’s true that, as the above article’s author says, “the Civil War marked the start of white decline” to Robertson’s way of thinking, then it’s a serious and almost inexplicable omission.

    • Agree: C.T.
    • Replies: @anon
  66. Anon[222] • Disclaimer says:

    “the laboriously accumulated privileges of Majority institutions were distributed gratis to members of other races and cultures, who accepted them as a matter of course, often with a show of ingratitude, and then used them for purposes entirely different from those for which they had been intended.”

    Let this quote sink in.

    Then think “Twitter” where the CEO who looks more simian than human gratuitously (as in unwarranted/unjustified) scrapped the first amendment rights of Americans. His statement “I don’t believe in the first amendent” is still ringing in my ears.

    That is what happens when people from other cultures who don’t really understand/appreciate the constitutional rights of the west are put in charge of managing them.

    It is akin to handing over the stewardship of Da Vinci’s Mona Lisa to a baboon and then being surprised at the outcome.

  67. anon[163] • Disclaimer says:

    Fucking moorns think that their country or countries can impose economic ,environmental,and social destructions and doslocations on others without consequences.
    Work for the art that you want to create like Athenians did but dont think the slaves undergirding the social structures and scaffolding the Athenian society wouldn’t claim the right size parcels of the land.

  68. C.T. says: • Website
    @Dr. Robert Morgan

    > Typical dissembling Amren bullshit.

    Keep in mind that when an interviewer asked Jared Taylor if he still professed the religion of his (very fanatical Christian) parents, he said that was a private matter. And although the female reporter insisted, Jared always avoided the question.

    Only the Nazi elites knew about the Christian Problem (the CQ). American racialists evade that question because, like Jared, they are incapable of criticising the crazy religion of their own parents.

    • Replies: @Chris Moore
  69. @Dr. Robert Morgan

    Does Acts 17:26 Prove That All Races Are Of ‘One Blood’ In Christ? – Christians for Truth
    https://christiansfortruth.com/does-acts-1726-prove-that-all-races-are-of-one-blood-in-christ/

  70. Anon[159] • Disclaimer says:
    @KenH

    Ron has it right. Immigration from Western Europe declined because they became rich, and it’s the poor that migrate. Second the rich and the free don’t breed, thus no surplus population. Any one of these two factors is sufficient to reduce west European migration. Immigration law is not as important.

    • Disagree: Robert Dolan, Trinity
    • Replies: @Robert Dolan
  71. anon[163] • Disclaimer says:
    @Dr. Robert Morgan

    There is still time left for the whites to ask the N leave the country for Liberia. There is eternity on the hand of the Native Anericnas to ask then force the white leave this country for Europe.

    • Replies: @Dchjk
  72. @Richard B

    Basically…..the border is wide open….and the jew Mayorkas is keeping it open.

    I read many articles detailing how the Biden jews are sending the illegals all over the country…..putting them on planes and busses, etc., sending the invaders into the whitest areas of America.

    My understanding of Hart-Celler is that it closed off whites and opened up immigration to non-whites, which is MOST of what we have gotten for the last 55 years. In addition, after passing Hart-Celler they pushed hard and got higher numbers of non-white immigration.

    AND….there’s birthright citizenship/family reunification.

    AND H1B1 visas that fuck whites out of work.

    AND a total refusal to use E-Verify at job sites.

    AND “refugee resettlement.”

    AND the absolute refusal to deport any of the invaders, including violent criminals.

    The list of outrages regarding the open borders invasion would be too long to deal with….
    but it’s easy to detect that organized jewry has been the most vocal group regarding the insane demand for unrestricted immigration.

    The FACT is that this was once a 90% white country, and whites are down to 60% and rapidly approaching minority status, while at the same time the Jmedia demonizes whites, incites blacks to kill whites, and also screeches for guns to be taken away from whites.

    What could go wrong?

    • Agree: Richard B
  73. This review, and if it accurately reflects White Dispossession, which I have not yet read, evinces the confused-confusing state of mind of the dissident right about the root cause of white decline.

    It is the Jews: “The TDM put great importance on the of the role of Jews in white dispossession. Indeed, a central theme of the book is that a hostile Jewish elite had displaced the old WASP elite starting in the 1930s Robertson’s discussion of the Boazian school’s takeover of anthropology, for example, emphasizes the number of Jews who were part of that movement.”

    Why would a huge white ruling class allow a tiny proportion of Jews to start displacing them, the cultural heritage and values of its people and nation, the moment it migrated to the US?

    We are told “many members of the old WASP establishment went along with and enabled” it —– because “rich whites” were more interested in advancing “their careers and fortunes by catering to minorities, an example being Franklin Roosevelt. Pussyfooters are whites — often
    lawyers, scientists, professors, or small newspaper editors”.

    Why would the “WASP establishment” go along with its replacement for the sake of “careers and fortunes” when it was the establishment? One would have expected Jews to go along with integration into WASP establishment for the sake of their advancement– which they did.

    “TDM claims that America does have a legitimate conservative tradition, even in the realm of race (men such as Lothrop Stoddard and Madison Grant). World War II and the Great Depression nearly wiped out all authentic American conservatism, resulting in Conservatism, Inc.”

    It looks like there was something about the WASP view of the world that allowed its “replacement” (which did not actually happen, since Jews peacefully integrated into the WASP establishment as junior co-partners).

    And this is the next view of TDM and reviewer: “The concluding section of TDM offers a possible solution. Whites must reject all aspects of liberalism. It was through this ideology that, ‘the laboriously accumulated privileges of Majority institutions were distributed gratis to members of other races and cultures, who accepted them as a matter of course, often with a show of ingratitude, and then used them for purposes entirely different from those for which they had been intended.’”

    Exactly: it was through liberalism that WASP accepted its “dispossession” for the very reason that liberalism did not view the rise of Jews into prominent positions as “dispossession” but as successful integration into WASP institutions and values.

    So, WASP liberalism is the root cause.

    • Replies: @Franklin Ryckaert
  74. ARepli says:

    Peter Bradley is right, the USA is horrible…

    Let’s take stock of our Conservative values:

    • openly crying about how awful your country
    • blaming others for your problems, and
    • joining sycophantic mobs.

    Oh, and appeals to Russians and Chinese as standards bearers.

    Great stuff! Thanks Peter, Thanks Ron

  75. SafeNow says:

    Katzenbach (Johnson’s attorney general) said that Mexican immigration would account for a tiny fraction of one percent of US population growth due to Hart-Cellar. The actual Act reshuffled which European countries would get priority. Thus, a Conservative would have to argue that it was not the text of the Act that opened the door to Mexicans in a direct textual fashion. Rather, the argument would have to be be that the Act fostered an ethos of indiscriminate acceptance, come one come all, what the heck. And Katzenberg did not anticipate the strength of this ethos. A political scientist or anthropologist specializing in what-the-heck would have to make this argument, and I have never seen anyone try. Sort of a “broken windows” argument applied to immigration.

  76. Gizmo880 says:
    @Poupon Marx

    I have also wondered about the data Ron used for his assertion that Hispanics have a similiar crime rate to that of Whites. I live in a SW Florida County that has had a very large influx of Hispanic immigrants in the last 20-25 years, and many neighborhoods that were once solidly white middle class are now almost 100% Hispanic. Not unlike most of Florida.

    However, when looking at the Sheriff’s website for arrests in the County, virtually every Hispanic arrested is listed as White/Caucasian. I don’t know if this is a common practice across the country, but if it is, I don’t see how any data on Hispanic crime rates is not seriously flawed, unless there is some other way that this data is being collected and analyzed.

    To be fair, Ron could certainly be correct as I have no concrete evidence to the contrary. Also, my experience has been that working class Hispanics cause far, far less behavioral issues, on average, when compared to our native Black population.

    • Agree: Poupon Marx
    • Replies: @Franklin Ryckaert
  77. Ron Unz says:

    For those so interested, a year or two ago I published a lengthy intellectual survey of American White Nationalism that included a couple of thousand words discussing Robertson and his book:

    https://www.unz.com/runz/white-racialism-in-america-then-and-now/#wilmot-robertson-the-dispossessed-majority-and-instauration

    • Thanks: aandrews
  78. @Ricardo Duchesne

    “…So, WASP liberalism is the root cause…”

    And who promoted liberalism, especially for WASPs?

    • Replies: @Ricardo Duchesne
  79. Wild Man says:
    @Ron Unz

    The gist of your take on immigration from Latin America, is that such people, by way of tendency towards respecting the laws of the land, are not much different than Caucasians.

    But corruption (and murderous cover-up of said corruption) is much higher in Mexico, (by way of one Latin American example). Why?

    Look …. I am of the classical liberal ilk myself, … I am with Donald Trump on his brand of civic nationalism (which is not the same as white nationalism), …. yet I see that the white nationalists have a point, about Latin America (i.e. – that it features hugely higher loads of systemic corruption, than the U.S., even now as the U.S. is imploding by way of Jewish-led faux-western globalist corruption). Are these white nationalists wrong about the hugely higher load of systemic corruption as experienced within the Mexican jurisdiction? No they are not, are they? So why do you just keep dancing around the issue? No shell games (look here, not there) allowed. After all, the shell game template (look here, not there) is a skill highly honed within the Jewish-led corrupting influence of faux-west globalization, as your entire editorial enterprise, wells outlines. So, as such, I would expect that you yourself do not practice that. So why do you continue to practice, that, which should not be allowed (dirty shell games – look here, not there), if your readership (such as myself) is to believe that you have been sincere with respect to the choices you have made, as to what to run on this site, ….. editorial decisions, which have been your decisions – no?

  80. Crush Limbraw: “Does Acts 17:26 Prove That All Races Are Of ‘One Blood’ In Christ? – Christians for Truth [link]”

    From the link: “It thus is a blatant error to say that “one blood” in Acts 17:26 means all people are related. … Adam and his descendants would be the common source of all nations. ”

    Your link talks in circles trying to deny the obvious. The bottom line is that if the creation myths of the OT are taken literally (which is Peter Bradley’s point is calling it a “racial classification”), then all men are descended from the same parentage, and are related.

  81. Anon[208] • Disclaimer says:
    @anon

    Blacks commit shootings, which is horrible, but whites do too. Blacks commit typical crimes of the poor and disaffected. Latinos torture their victims. There’s your different mentality. I prefer African Americans any day! Latinos are as vicious as ISIS fanatics when they have grievances. But the MSM la Raza propagandists cover for them.

    • Replies: @Trinity
  82. GerFer says:

    “The rot had set in decades before the US was colonized by the Third World”

    Your country was founded primarily on the slavery of blacks.

    Later it had its second refoundation with the ROBBERY of half the country from your neighbor, in an unjust war, in a war of dispossession.

    and now you come to cry because you are being “colonized by the third world”?

    you are a hypocrite. You forget your own history.

    • Replies: @Franklin Ryckaert
    , @Bernie
  83. Thanks Peter, I had never heard of this book and author until now. UNZ is equivalent to a Knowledge University for Mankind.

    Very much appreciated,

    Cheers,

    CQ

  84. @Robert Dolan

    99.9% black/Hispanics/Asian/Armenian and two white guys, that ends showing how LAPD gots you back show two lesbians cops.
    Yeah, they not only got our back, they got our anal cavity also.

  85. @Gizmo880

    If Hispanics in the US have about the same crime rate as Whites, then Mr. Unz has to explain why their countries of origin differ so much in this respect from the US.

    On the website International Homicides (per 100,000 people) – Country Ranking (https://www.indexmundi.com/facts/indicators/VC.IHR.PSRC.P5/rankings) of the 172 countries listed the US is nr. 64 (4.96 homicides per 100,000), with 18 Latin American countries worse than it. El Salvador is nr. 1 (52.02 homicides per 100,000), while Mexico is nr. 13 (29.07 homicides per 100,000). These are great differences.

    So either only the “good guys” among the Hispanics emigrate to the US (very unlikely), or we are talking about the effect of “magic dirt” (impossible), or….Mr. Unz’data simply are wrong. If Hispanic criminals are listed as “white” that could explain the discrepancy.

    • Replies: @Robert Dolan
    , @Ron Unz
  86. Malla says:

    Corporate Capitalism, Globalism (Spreading Democracy, Free Trade), Jews in power, Cultural Marxism and destruction of traditional European?Western cultural norms, dumbing down of education, media brainwashing and mass immigration of non Whites with third world genes/mentality.
    All of them enough to destroy a prosperous society.

  87. @Franklin Ryckaert

    I forgot to delete this line from comment I wrote which takes away from the point I was trying to make: ““TDM claims that America does have a legitimate conservative tradition, even in the realm of race (men such as Lothrop Stoddard and Madison Grant). World War II and the Great Depression nearly wiped out all authentic American conservatism, resulting in Conservatism, Inc.”

    Anyways, WASP = liberalism.

  88. anonymous[229] • Disclaimer says:

    The Civil War that erased STATES rights, Civil Rights, Desegragation, affirmative action, abortions, LGBT, anti white/antiBIRTH/antiMEN FEMINIST, IMMIGRATION..open borders, freetraders NEOCON world WARS..ALL doom AMERICA..

  89. @GerFer

    “…Your country was founded primarily on the slavery of blacks…”

    A gross exaggeration. The US was founded mainly by pioneers who carved out a nation in a wilderness sparsely populated by savages. Only a small percentage of white Americans owned slaves. The US became a wealthy nation, not by slavery but by industrialization, and that mostly in the North.

    “…Later it had its second refoundation with the ROBBERY of half the country from your neighbor, in an unjust war, in a war of dispossession…”

    That is properly called CONQUEST, the same way the Spanish (and Portuguese) obtained what is now called “Latin America”. The part of Mexico that the US conquered was sparsely populated by indigenous Indians, hardly by Mexicans and not at all by Aztecs. At most it was “robbery” of one colonial state by another.

    • Agree: Robert Dolan, Bernie
  90. @Robert Dolan

    Clearly the worst regions are black Africa and Latin America with the most amerindian blood. Quod erat expectandum.

  91. Trinity says:
    @Anon

    Blacks are notorious for torturing White victims. You got to be kidding.

    Black lady abducted 12 year old White male and burns him to death with a blow torch in Texas.
    Wichita Massacre
    Knoxville Horror
    Jessica Chambers the real Mississippi Burning

    I could go on for weeks and use tens of thousands of words…..

    Nonwhites bring nothing to the table but violence, leeching, etc. Whites do not need nonwhites, we do better without them.

    • Agree: Bernie, Malla
  92. Gizmo880 says:

    https://apps.urban.org/features/latino-criminal-justice-data/

    “A state’s failure to collect and report ethnicity data affects not only Latinos but the entire criminal justice system. States that only count people as “black” or “white” likely label most of their Latino prison population “white,” artificially inflating the number of “white” people in prison…”

    A quick search seemed to show that many states simply label Hispanic/Latino criminals as White.

    Again, I have no idea of the source of Ron’s data, but if my County and what seems to be a problem across the country in labeling criminals correctly is any indication, then Hispanics/Latino’s seem to be underrepresented in the crime statistics.

    • Replies: @Trinity
  93. Chris Moore says: • Website
    @C.T.

    Only the Nazi elites knew about the Christian Problem (the CQ). American racialists evade that question because, like Jared, they are incapable of criticising the crazy religion of their own parents.

    There is no Christian Problem. There is a ((Christian)) Problem. There’s also a ((Nazi/Judeofascist)) problem. Fuhrer ((Zelensky)), natural, diminishing, pathetic heir to Adolph, is the current leader.

    It’s too bad that Robertson didn’t bother understanding the implications of the ((Cousinhood’s)) infiltration and control of the Anglosphere.
    https://www.algora.com/Algora_blog/2022/01/29/free-to-cheat-jewish-emancipation-and-the-anglo-jewish-cousinhood

    Did Hitler even know he was a ((Jew))-stooge? Or was he a reactionary, made into a ((Jew)) stooge junkyard dog by the first world war and the ((Jews’)) Weimar perversions, the groundwork laid by his own nutty, half-baked ((Christian)) parents?

    Maybe Taylor is too warped to see it, but Kevin MacDonald knows. What’s his excuse? His excuse is that he’s vested in the wrong ideology, and can’t turn back at this late date.

    He should have just stuck to exposing the ((Jews)), but he has a warped Catholic’s savior complex, which steered him wrong. Like Hitler, he should have analyzed how the ((Jews)) and their stooges warped society instead of reacting to it by emulating them with his own version of Judeofascism.

  94. C.T.: “Only the Nazi elites knew about the Christian Problem (the CQ). American racialists evade that question because, like Jared, they are incapable of criticising the crazy religion of their own parents.”

    Whether we are discussing the effects Christianity or technology in general, it’s almost impossible to get people to take responsibility for the consequences of their own actions. Always easier to blame others than oneself.

  95. Trinity says:
    @Gizmo880

    Most Whites ( real Whites, no Hispanic or other bullshit) are incarcerated for nonviolent offenses as well. Go to maximum security prisons and White prisoners are easily outnumbered by Black and Brown inmates.

    If Hispanics are all that than why are there so many in maximum security prisons in places like California, Texas, etc.

  96. Charles says:

    I have not (yet) read Wilmot’s book so I can make no comment on it. The late Revilo P. Oliver, from what I can gather from his works, made essentially the same arguments with a crucial difference – the foundations of Whites’ self-inflicted wounds are Whites’ religious beliefs. They are intellectual and, more importantly, emotional hurdles which cannot be faced and certainly not analyzed. I believe the same.

  97. @Zumbuddi

    True enough, but you can’t blame the gator if you put yourself inside its jaws.

    Wasps, who ruled the US, handed the US to Jews on a silver platter, and the white masses cheered and obeyed.

  98. “Whites must reject all aspects of liberalism” the article states.

    I agree, and not only for Whites to reclaim the nation, but to survive. Globohomo is going to war, literally, to give a man the right to stick his penis in another man’s anus. Is it any wonder most of the world is siding with Russia and China??

    Rejecting liberalism is fundamentally about survival.

  99. Corvinus says:
    @Automatic Slim

    “The Irish and Italians that came to America were
    discriminated against and considered unassimilable due to various biases and little feuds that existed in Europe between them and English, Germans, and others.”

    No, it was full blown prejudice.

    “It was not based on any real significant flaws, in intelligence, work ethic, or inventiveness of Irish and Italians.”

    Clearly you haven’t read Madison Grant. The fact of the matter is that the Irish and the Italians were considered direct threats to the American Protestant way of life.

    “And in fact, being fellow white Europeans, once they were given a chance they became major contributors to the building and betterment of America.”

    So those characterizations were wrong? Nativists were mistaken regarding their beliefs about the Irish and the Italians?

    “We were already stuck with the blacks we brought over who have been a huge net drain on the country”

    Immigrants from Eastern and Southern Europe were also considered a net drain. So did magic dirt save them?

    “In more recent decades we have brought in millions of Hmong, Africans, middle-easterners. Mexicans and Central Americans, and others who show little sign of totally assimilating”.

    Lol, you’re employing the same argument as nativists toward the Irish, Italians, Poles, and Slavs. How ironic AND hypocritical.

    “Demography is destiny. And no civilization or society can survive the loss of its founding race.”

    Right, which had been WASPs. It’s been downhill ever since we brought in non-WASPs.

    You have to go back.

  100. @Ron Unz

    Okay, so let’s accept for the sake of argument that – on paper – the 1965 Immigration Act restricted immigration. Then why did the immigrant population grow so rapidly after 1970? What kind of ‘restriction’ is that produces the exact opposite effect. As ‘population growth in that region’ what exactly are you saying happened? Mexicans mothers started pumping out 10 children apiece? There’s no evidence of that being the case. All evidence points towards Mexicans having a reduced birthrate once settled in the US. Celler was a Jew who had been pushing immigration increases for decades before the Act that bore his name. You’re saying that he lent his name to an Act that did the exact opposite of what he had been striving for much of his Congressional career. I’m not buying it. The Jews habitually use immigrants as weapons against host populations. They are everywhere in the judiciary and NGOs promoting the interests of immigration and immigrants. It’s not a coincidence that the non-White ‘immigrant’ population exploded in the US even though the native Mexican population has close-to-replacement birth-rates. The Act did something and that something made White dispossession increase.

    • Agree: Robert Dolan
    • Replies: @Ron Unz
    , @RockaBoatus
  101. @Corvinus

    You’re so pro-WASP you’re anti-White. Cool.

  102. Ron Unz says:
    @HamburgerToday

    Okay, so let’s accept for the sake of argument that – on paper – the 1965 Immigration Act restricted immigration. Then why did the immigrant population grow so rapidly after 1970?

    It’s really not complicated. Mexico and the rest of Latin America underwent a huge population explosion around that time, so large numbers came north. Prior to that, Mexico had always been under-populated, so immigration had been minimal.

    Here’s a chart showing Mexico’s demographic history, increasing from 20M in 1940 to nearly 100M in 2000, and the latter figure would have been much higher if so many millions of Mexicans hadn’t moved to the US:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_Mexico#Demographic_dynamics

    • Replies: @Richard B
  103. Ron Unz says:
    @Franklin Ryckaert

    If Hispanics in the US have about the same crime rate as Whites, then Mr. Unz has to explain why their countries of origin differ so much in this respect from the US.

    Look, the undeniable empirical reality is that Hispanics in the US have approximately the same crime rates as whites of the same age and gender.

    I can’t really say why crime rates are so much higher in some of those Latin American countries. Maybe the poverty, maybe the drug wars, maybe the corrupt governments. Probably a mix of numerous different factors. But that has nothing do with the actual reality in the US.

    I’m not going to waste my time arguing with any of you—read my articles if you’re interested:

    https://www.unz.com/runz/the-myth-of-hispanic-crime/

    https://www.unz.com/runz/race-and-crime-in-america/

    https://www.unz.com/runz/immigration-building-a-wall-and-hispanic-crime/

    When I first began publishing these articles in 2010, almost 100% of the rightwingers and WN-types ferociously disagreed with me, and they endlessly disputed my analysis. But as the years have gone by, nearly all of the smarter ones have quietly recognized that I had been right all along. That’s why they only very rarely talk about “Hispanic crime” these days.

    You can believe whatever you want, but nearly everyone who’s carefully looked into the issue knows that I’m right.

  104. @Corvinus

    Sorry Chimpie. I am full blown WASP with English and Danish roots. I am not going back anywhere.
    However, you and your fellow outdated farm equipment cannot go back fast enough to your motherland. I seem to remember you are a nig, some other non-white, or at least a deracinated white apologist for non-whites (almost as bad).

    So keep your mouth shut and your eyes open. Looking at your post history, you present as a pseudo-intellectual boob who is part of the problem and not the solution.

  105. If America continues to decline, it will be one of the most amazing and depressing stories ever told.

    And you lost me right there.

    Given the Century of barbarism the US has inflicted around the world the word uplifting springs to mind rather depressing.

    • Replies: @Bernie
  106. Corvinus says:

    “Sorry Chimpie. I am full blown WASP with English and Danish roots.”

    Anyone can say anything on the Internet. You speak like you are Slavic. Nothing wrong with them. Nativists, though, took umbrage with your kind. Hot headed and dull, they said.

    “ I seem to remember you are a nig, some other non-white, or at least a deracinated white apologist for non-whites (almost as bad).”

    I’m Polish, German, and Dutch. All goy.

    “So keep your mouth shut and your eyes open.”

    You just confirmed you’re Slavic. Thanks.

  107. @HamburgerToday

    “Celler was a Jew who had been pushing immigration increases for decades before the Act that bore his name. You’re saying that he lent his name to an Act that did the exact opposite of what he had been striving for much of his Congressional career. I’m not buying it” – I’m trying to understand Mr. Unz’s reasoning, but like yourself I keep running into the same points you have stated. It just doesn’t make any sense when everything is considered.

    Jews and all the same politically left players in congress were thrilled by the passage of the bill. This tells me that it was not really designed for the benefit of Heritage Americans (whites). Celler and his cohorts worked too long and hard to get this bill passed, and I doubt it was for the purpose of restricting non-white immigration to the U.S.

    • Agree: Robert Dolan
    • Replies: @Robert Dolan
    , @Ron Unz
  108. Bernie says:
    @GerFer

    The US would certainly be better off without slavery and the presence of blacks. But slavery merely provided farm labor in the South. Blacks were few in the other sections of the US, which were much wealthier than the South.

    As for hypocrisy, what do you call a group who complain of “racism” despite living in a nation they could not create and getting preferences at every turn?

    It should have been made mandatory for blacks to go to Liberia after the Civil War. The fact that so few went despite the “racism” they supposedly had to endure is telling.

  109. @Ron Unz

    Thanks for this, I did not know the ’20’s- 65 latin immigration situation and have wrongly blamed the 65 Act.

  110. Bernie says:
    @Bill Jones

    From the review:

    “The section on the racial clash ends with a discussion of foreign policy — which no longer serves whites. Robertson gives an overview of American foreign policy disasters through the 20th century and writes, “Not only America but most of the world has lived to regret the day the Majority lost control of American foreign policy.”

    • Replies: @mulga mumblebrain
  111. @RockaBoatus

    Response from KMAC:

    Kevin MacDonaldsays:
    June 20, 2022 at 8:20 am
    “I recall he emailed me his opinion. Other writers looking at the law, like Hugh Davis Graham and Otis Graham, and Jewish writers like Earl Raab, see it as a watershed event. I discuss these writers and deal with Nathan Cofnas’s claims re the article here:
    http://www.kevinmacdonald.net/Anti-JewishNarrativePDF.pdf

    In my view, the law by itself didn’t change US demography, but it got rid of the national origins provisions so after that Jewish organizations simply pushed for greater numbers.”

  112. @anon

    Mr Unz’s views on Hispanic crime seem to be somewhat at odds with this:

    https://worldpopulationreview.com/world-city-rankings/most-violent-cities-in-the-world

    Four out of the top five ain’t bad.

    Perhaps he refers to Hispanic crime in the US, which Sailer has trouble with because of the sloppiness in the FBI data categorizing “Hispanics”, in which case he seemingly supports the Magic Dirt theory that where you are determines who you are.

  113. ricpic says:
    @Matt Lazarus

    You left out Edward Hopper. His paintings – an astonishing number are masterpieces – are physical manifestations of the White Protestant sensibility when it was still dominant in America.

    • Replies: @Matt Lazarus
  114. Ron Unz: “It’s really not complicated. Mexico and the rest of Latin America underwent a huge population explosion around that time, so large numbers came north. Prior to that, Mexico had always been under-populated, so immigration had been minimal.”

    The population explosion itself was an unintended side effect of the Green Revolution of the late 60s, which involved “progress” in agricultural technologies and their distribution to countries such as Mexico.

    Also there was vast “progress” in transportation. Air travel, automobile highway systems, and even railroad transportation between Mexico and the US essentially didn’t exist in the 1920s when Johnson-Reed was passed. The Sonoran and Chihuahuan deserts provide a natural barrier between the two countries. They acted as a barrier to race mixing in the same way that the Sahara desert protected Europe from much contact with sub-Saharan Africans until modern times. “Progress” has eliminated these as a factor. Worldwide in 2016, 3.8 billion people traveled by air. How many did that in the 20s? The “invasion” of the US and Europe is to a large extent only made possible by these technological developments.

    • Replies: @Malla
    , @Adûnâi
  115. Here’s the thing….if there was spontaneous massive third world immigration into ONE….or maybe TWO white western European Christian nations….maybe I could shrug it off and let it go.

    However…..when I see every white nation on earth being slammed with massive non-white immigration….literally every white country on earth…..then I know….for SURE….that this has been a deliberately engineered method to dispossess and disempower whites worldwide.

    The USA, Canada, England, Ireland, Scotland, France, Germany, Sweden, Italy, New Zealand. Australia, etc…….all being SLAMMED with hostile invaders……

    C’mon.

    There is no way in hell this is spontaneous or normal or some kind of serendipity…..this is a socially engineered ethnic cleansing of whites. There is no other way to describe it.

    http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/topic/mini-mantras-pro/

    PART ONE – ICEBREAKERS

    [MORE]

    ——————————————————————————————————————————-
    Anti-Whites say there should be no White Countries✓
    Anti-Whites say there should be no White Cities✓
    Anti-Whites say there should be no White Neighborhoods✓
    Anti-Whites say there should be no White Workplaces✓
    Anti-Whites say there should be no White Schools✓
    Anti-Whites say there should be no White Sports✓
    Anti-Whites say there should be no White Anything✓
    Anti-Whites say there should be no Whites✓
    Anti-racist is a >codewordcodewordcodecodeword< for anti-White!
    /watch?v=203-BKE5MgU
    ——————————————————————————————————————————-
    Why is it that EVERY white country is forced to be multicultural/multiracial?
    Why is it that EVERY white country is told to end its own race/culture?
    No one asks that of -ANY- non-White country.
    Immigration/assimilation is FORCED upon ONLY White countries
    Anti-whites call themselves “anti-racists” but their actions lead to the elimination of only one race, the White race.
    The purpose of “anti-racism” is to genocide White children.
    Anti-racist is a code for anti-White
    /watch?v=203-BKE5MgU
    ——————————————————————————————————————————-
    If I hated a race, I might campaign to flood all of their countries with MILLIONS of people that are not their race, and tell everyone to “mix in” until no people of that kind were left.
    If anyone objected, I would scream the R-word! at them and get them fired from their jobs.
    If I hated a certain race, I might do that, but I am not doing that.
    Anti-Whites are doing it to White people in EVERY & ONLY White countries.
    It’s WHITE geNOcide!
    Anti-Racist is a code for anti-White.
    /watch?v=203-BKE5MgU
    ——————————————————————————————————————————-
    Excuse me, but could any sane person not realize that flooding EVERY & ONLY White countries with MILLIONS of non-Whites and telling everyone to “assimilate” to create a blended humanity IS white GENOCIDE?
    Africa will still be full of Africans
    Asia will still be full of Asians
    Only White children will suffer from this insanity.
    iT’s wHitE geNOcide
    Except they don’t call it GENOCIDE when it’s done to White children.
    They call it “diversity”
    Anti-racist is a code for anti-White
    /watch?v=203-BKE5MgU
    ——————————————————————————————————————————-
    Everyone talks about this RACE problem and says that this RACE problem will be over when the third-world pours into EVERY White country and ONLY into WHITE countries.

    Everyone says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY White country and ONLY White countries to “assimilate,” that is, intermarry, with all those non-Whites.

    They’re pushing wHiTe geNOcide!

    They claim they are “anti-racist”, what they are is anti-White
    Anti-racist is a code for anti-White
    /watch?v=203-BKE5MgU
    ——————————————————————————————————————————-
    ASIA FOR THE ASIANS, AFRICA FOR THE AFRICANS, WHITE COUNTRIES FOR EVERYBODY!
    The words “immigration”, “tolerance” and “assimilation” are being used to PROMOTE a program of geNOcide against White children.

    According to International Law, open borders, FORCED integration, and assimilation is GENOCIDE.
    Except they don’t call it GENOCIDE when it’s done to White children.
    Then they call it “multiculturalism”
    STOP WHITE GENOCIDE!
    Anti-racist is a codeword for anti-White
    /watch?v=203-BKE5MgU
    ——————————————————————————————————————————-
    Imagine what WHITE GENOCIDE would be like.
    You would have to flood EVERY & ONLY white countries with millions of non-whites.
    Then you would have to demoralize ALL whites by screaming the R-Word! at them if they objected
    Then you would have to pass laws to FORCE integrate all those non-whites into every facet of White society
    Then you would have to…Oh wait. This is already happening!
    They say it’s “anti-racist” but it’s simply anti-White
    Anti-racist is a code for anti-White
    /watch?v=203-BKE5MgU

    • Agree: usNthem
  116. It was Jews who were mostly responsible for this.

  117. Anon[271] • Disclaimer says:

    Hi Unzites from Miles,

    The globalist fix was installed in America very professionally so that when perhaps 10% of whites noticed what was becoming inevitable, they would have their lives damaged if they organized or spoke out in enough media against it. The globalists had their accusatory arms like ADL in place, their media in place, and enough control over state and corporate employments in place to bully Gentile whites into acquiescence before really turning on the jets of immigration on flyover country in the mid 1980’s.

    When a group of people is not allowed to organize and meet to make plans, you can bet that the powers-that-be have bad intentions for them. The Romans moved to Constantinople and had another good 500 years. I’m afraid we don’t have a Constantinople. Russia is the only big white place left that isn’t replacing its whites with both hands.

  118. JBond says:

    American women are complicit.

  119. JackOH says:

    I’m sympathetic to Robertson, and those other racialist theoreticians. But, how relevant can they be?
    Aren’t we already apres le deluge, over the dam, under the bridge?

    I may be off base, but hearkening to White racialism/identitarianism seems to me something like wishful thinking. We’ve been badly mauled by the other guys’ mostly conventional political legwork, so now we’re looking for a magic bullet to get us out of our funk. No disrespect is intended. I happen to be a fan of mainstreamability, that’s all.

    • Replies: @mulga mumblebrain
  120. Dchjk says:
    @anon

    Do the Indigians own America? Was it illegal do or Europeans to come here? Where was it written? Who owned the oceans?

  121. @Bernie

    It’s complete garbage. Black Americans are still the most impoverished group in the USA, with much of their miserable household ‘wealth’ stolen during the Great Recession under Obama. They are the most incarcerated group in the USA, the mechanism chosen, through ‘The War on Drugs’, to reverse the Civil Rights gains. And they are vastly under-represented in the real corridors of power, ie the world of money power, finance and usury. Even when they achieve status in academia or the law, they are still likely to be pulled over and harassed for driving an expensive car, while Black.

    • Disagree: Robert Dolan
    • Replies: @Robert Dolan
  122. @JackOH

    Robertson et al are employed to hide the real truth behind White ‘dispossession’-class warfare and elite depredations. To make it a race question, rather than a class and economic one, is an exercise in ‘Divide and Rule’ politics.

    • Replies: @JackOH
  123. @Bernie

    American foreign policy aggression and depravity may have worsened post 1972, but the basic parameters were set with the Monroe Doctrine and the theft of half of Mexico. Post 1972 most exploitation and violence directed by the USA has been economic, and achieved by sanctions, subversion, the Washington Consensus ‘economic hit-men’, ie the IMF, World Bank, WTO etc, and through savage proxy stooges.

  124. @Ron Unz

    Well, if your data are right (and I am inclined to accept them) then still we need an explanation. If we reject the idea of “selective immigration of only the good guys” or the mysterious workings of “magic dirt”, then what is it?

    Perhaps people in Latin American countries are only more criminal out of necessity. That could be the existence of a cruel oppressive ruling class, combined with few economic opportunities. In the absence of these no crime is “necessary”.

    It is the same with Hindu immigrants in western countries. Their country of origin is hopelessly corrupt, but in the West they behave as lawabiding citizens.

    • Replies: @Ron Unz
  125. Malla says:
    @Dr. Robert Morgan

    The population explosion itself was an unintended side effect of the Green Revolution of the late 60s, which involved “progress” in agricultural technologies and their distribution to countries such as Mexico.

    Suicidal Whitey with his Enlightenment “improve the World”, “White man’s burden” craze invent technologies which end up destroying him in the long term. And after he is gone, the World goes back to its original state. So what was the sacrifice for? Waste.

  126. Charles says:
    @Ron Unz

    I have had occasion to be in and among large groups of Hispanics (in the US). In no instance have I had any reason that I could perceive to fear for my safety. This includes instances at night in a large-ish metro area.

  127. @Trinity

    Appreciate your sentiments. Can we just say that the US shouldn’t have intervened on either side?

    • Agree: Trinity
  128. @mulga mumblebrain

    Whew.

    I would love to know what your IQ is.

    Where to start?

    Blacks are the most incarcerated because BLACKS DO THE MOST CRIME YOU DIMWIT.

    Organized jewry works overtime on behalf of criminal blacks….which is not a favor to blacks in the long run.

    Working whites have been taxed to death, wasting trillions on the black HOLE….and still nothing improves.

    BLM blacks are allowed to run wild, burning, looting, killing…..and nothing is done.

    Black juries refuse to convict blacks who murder whites.

    Blacks are raping and killing whites and nothing is done because cops have been disempowered by Fentanyl Floyd.

    In fact, whites are not even allowed to defend themselves against murderous blacks.

    I have no idea what you are bitching about. The jews have elevated your criminal class to the status of idol worship.

    Bitch, if you don’t like it in a white country, then move your sorry ass back to africa and see how you like it.

  129. vladimir says:

    The ‘civilized’ world

  130. Ron Unz says:
    @RockaBoatus

    “Celler was a Jew who had been pushing immigration increases for decades before the Act that bore his name. You’re saying that he lent his name to an Act that did the exact opposite of what he had been striving for much of his Congressional career. I’m not buying it” – I’m trying to understand Mr. Unz’s reasoning, but like yourself I keep running into the same points you have stated. It just doesn’t make any sense when everything is considered.

    The history is very simple. For many decades, there had been an ongoing political struggle in Congress over immigration, with various groups determined to repeal the 1924 restrictions. However, the entire battle had been over European immigration, with nobody caring or paying much attention to Latin American immigration.

    In fact, I think I remember reading somewhere that the severe restrictions on Latin American immigration included in the 1965 Act were actually added to the bill by the pro-immigration side as a very minor sop to the anti-immigrationists.

    Kevin MacDonald discussed all of this on p. 292 of The Culture of Critique, in which he specifically emphasized that by including the Western Hemisphere for the first time, the 1965 Act “end[ed] the possibility of unrestricted immigration from those regions.”

    Here’s a link to the HTML version available on this website:

    https://www.unz.com/book/kevin_macdonald__the-culture-of-critique/#p_53_26

    Basically, prior to the 1965 Act we had an “open borders” policy with Mexico, the rest of Latin America, and the Caribbean. So if not for the 1965 Act, I’d guess that 100 million immigrants, including the entire population of Haiti, would probably have moved to America during the 1980s and 1990s.

  131. Ron Unz says:
    @Franklin Ryckaert

    Well, if your data are right (and I am inclined to accept them) then still we need an explanation. If we reject the idea of “selective immigration of only the good guys” or the mysterious workings of “magic dirt”, then what is it?

    Perhaps people in Latin American countries are only more criminal out of necessity. That could be the existence of a cruel oppressive ruling class, combined with few economic opportunities. In the absence of these no crime is “necessary”.

    Well, my impression is that prior to the last three decades or so, violent crime rates were pretty low in Mexico and most of Central America. I think after the Colombian drug cartels were severely weakened, new Mexican drug cartels took their place, and the the battles among those cartels and with the Mexican government were the cause of the skyrocketing crime. My impression is also that an overwhelming majority of the victims are the rival gangsters. But I’ve never really looked into the issue. I’d assume various sociologists or journalists have analyzed it over the years.

    My own analysis was been restricted to crime by Hispanics in the US.

    • Replies: @Poupon Marx
  132. vladimir says:

    Death to apartheid entity. Down with the occupiers and its supporters US, France, Germany,
    Britain, Russia, India, UAE and more.

  133. Ron Unz: “Kevin MacDonald discussed all of this on p. 292 of The Culture of Critique, in which he specifically emphasized that by including the Western Hemisphere for the first time, the 1965 Act “end[ed] the possibility of unrestricted immigration from those regions.””

    I wouldn’t say he emphasized it. In fact, for him it’s an inconvenient fact that conflicts with his overall take on the 1965 Act, which is that it was a Jewish plot to replace white people with immigrants and build a multi-cultural society. He says, for example, a couple of paragraphs later:

    The 1965 law is having the effect that it seems reasonable to suppose had been intended by its Jewish advocates all along: The Census Bureau projects that by the year 2050, European-derived peoples will no longer be a majority of the population of the United States. Moreover, multiculturalism has already become a powerful ideological and political reality.

    If Jewish activists really were plotting to swamp American whites with Mexicans and Central and South Americans, along with the negroes in Haiti that you mention, they should have used all their power to keep the 1924 Act in place unmodified. This is an obvious objection to his conspiracy theory that MacDonald has never dealt with at all, afaik. LOL, he’s been so quiet about it, I’m pretty sure he hopes nobody notices.

    • Replies: @Robert Dolan
  134. anonymous[272] • Disclaimer says:

    The bastard whitevil race has dispossessed other races since time immemorial.

    The payback is now.

    So, stop whining and face the just comeuppance with a sense of what it truly is, Divine justice.

    The western evilisation must burn.

  135. @Robert Dolan

    The jews have elevated your criminal class to the status of idol worship.

    I supposed they think the time has come to thank the blacks for keeping the entire judiciary employed. All those cops, lawyers, judges, prison guards, probation officers, bounty hunters, etc. would be out of work if not for the criminals. They feed off each other. Even if crime could be eliminated all those professions involved in crime fighting would oppose such a peaceful state of affairs.

  136. @Robert Dolan

    You know what they say about inadequates obsessed with IQs, don’t you Bozo.Why are racists ALWAYS such cretins?

    • Replies: @Robert Dolan
  137. eah says:
    @Ron Unz

    I hardly find it worthwhile to respond at such a late date, …

    That’s pretty funny Unz.

    And actually, it was a ‘Yes’ or ‘No’ question:

    Have you addressed Kirkegaard’s argument somewhere Ron? I’d be interested in hearing your take on it.

    Next time, instead of all the blah blah, which included ad hominem directed against someone whose work you admittedly have not examined, just answer the question — in this case, I’ll take the answer to be ‘No’.

  138. @ricpic

    Yes, of course, Edward Hopper, a great artist. As for those seeking “culture” but could not find it in the America of their time, I would also mention Gertrude Stein who famously said of Oakland, California: “There is no there there.” The people, mostly lower class, who left England, Ireland, Europe for America wanted to be “culture” behind them. They wanted land and wide open spaces. Basically, they embraced, culturally speaking, the North American emptiness. Edward Hopper found that emptiness everywhere.

  139. JackOH says:
    @mulga mumblebrain

    True dat. In my onetime iron and steel area, the nascent money class always sacrificed whatever sense of racial solidarity they felt for the sake of cheap stoop labor. Europeans after the 1860s, Great Migration Blacks, Mexicans, and, after WWII, Europeans again and Puerto Ricans.

    Those stupid, shortsighted Anglo industrial leaders’ lust for cheap labor put Mobbed-up unions in charge of their shop floor, and likewise put the Mob in charge of city hall and the courthouse.

    As I said, I’m sympathetic to those racialist guys. I just think their time is long past, and these days they offer little or no mainstreamability.

  140. KenH says:
    @Ron Unz

    and (C) reopened immigration from Europe, while shifting the various European quotas.

    It did? How so?

    The 1965 immigration act abolished the national origin quota system that favored America’s Northern and Western European demography. America actually got whiter between 1924 and 1965 because of it. Europeans didn’t just suddenly lose interest in immigrating to American in 1965 and after. They were increasingly barred from doing so since our immigration policy began favoring non-whites over white Europeans, so I’m sure a lot of them gave up trying like Asians did between 1924 and 1965.

    Detractors of the 1965 immigration bill argued that it would alter America’s demographics away from its European core. I supposed you could argue that that was not the intent but that has been the result.

    • Agree: Robert Dolan
    • Replies: @Ron Unz
  141. @Dr. Robert Morgan

    Doubletalk.

    You are not making any sense here.

    The 1965 act got rid of the national origin provisions of the 1924 act…..

    The 1924 act was designed to preserve the European majority and keep America the SAME mix found in the country at that time (which actually seems like a fair thing to do)

    Gutting this rule opened the gates and that is exactly what Javitz SAID.
    * Senator Jacob Javits played a prominent role in the Senate hearings on the 1965 bill. Javits authored an article entitled ‘Let’s open the gates’ that proposed immigration levels of 500,000 per year for 20 years with no restrictions on national origin.

    Then, in addition to insane rates of legal immigration of between one and two MILLION per year, we’ve had an open border where God knows how many invaders have come in…..likely 30 MILLION or so……not to mention crime and gangs and drugs and disease.

  142. @mulga mumblebrain

    I can see that I triggered you….and you did some decent name calling in a screaming fit of jungle rage…..

    but you didn’t address even ONE fact regarding the utter failure of the black community to live normally with others.

    • Replies: @mulga mumblebrain
  143. @Ron Unz

    Ron, the main point of contention is not your compiling of data or methodology, the salient point is how the term “Hispanics” is applied, who is accepted as “Hispanic” or counted “White”.

    It is known that many Hispanics are counted as White, if they look White. Population selection in a study is the first step toward construction. Get that wrong and the rest is diminished or worthless.

    Latinos account for 831 per 100k of population in American prisons, while Whites comprise 450 per 100k. There are other behavior patterns that are not desirable in Latinos, much more prevalent than in Whites and generally accepted public comportment of the European and Asian peoples.

    • Replies: @Ron Unz
  144. A typical example of what characterizes the Jewish push for open immigration can be seen in the following 1948 quote by David Petegorsky, former Director of the AJCongress:

    —— “Jewish survival can only take place within the framework of a progressive and expanding democratic society, which through its institutions and public policies gives expression to the concept of cultural pluralism.” ——

    Here Are The Names Of The Jews Behind The Open Immigraton Law of 1965:

    1. Senator Jacob Javits (NY)
    2. Congressman Emanuel Celler (NY)
    3. Leo Pfeffer (Former President of
    American Jewish Congress (AJC)
    4. Norman Podhoretz (Writer and Member of The Council of Foreign Relations)

    * Senator Jacob Javits played a prominent role in the Senate hearings on the 1965 bill. Javits authored an article entitled ‘Let’s open the gates’ that proposed immigration levels of 500,000 per year for 20 years with no restrictions on national origin.

    * Congressman Emanuel Celler, who fought for unrestricted immigration for over 40 years in the House of Representatives, introduced similar legislation resulting in the “Cellar-Hart Immigration Bill,” the precursor to the fatal bill of 1965.

    * Leo Pfeffer, a so-called, “Jewish Intellect,” (translate, “Christ-Hater”), wrote many treatises and books that propagandized for open immigration.

    * Norman Podhoretz, a former leftist, now a Jewish “neo-con,” (he’s still a leftist), also wrote many articles promoting open immigration.

    * Jewish organizations such as the American Jewish Congress, The Jewish Federation, the ACLU, and the B’nai B’rith, (there is no end to their organizations), filed briefs in support of open immigration before the Senate Subcommittee in the early sixties leading up to the passing of the 1965 law.

    THE 1965 OPEN IMMIGRATION LAW IS PRESENTLY fulfilling the aims of the Jewish conspiracy as seen in its effects. The U.S. Census Bureau projects that by the year 2050, European-derived peoples will no longer be a majority of the population of America due to the massive influx of immigrants since the signing of the bill in 1965.

    Most of these immigrants come from Third World Nations whose customs, religions, and culture are far removed from anything remotely resembling Christianity. Within the context of a Jewish-informed “multicultural America,” these immigrants are encouraged by the Jews to retain their own languages, customs, and religions.

    The Jews have also given these immigrants a moral mandate to expand both demographically and politically. And expand they will and do! But any attempts by European-derived peoples to retain demographic, political, and cultural control in America are represented by the Jews as being ‘racist’ and ‘immoral.’

    • Thanks: Trinity
  145. Ron Unz says:
    @KenH

    The 1965 immigration act abolished the national origin quota system that favored America’s Northern and Western European demography. America actually got whiter between 1924 and 1965 because of it.

    No. The main impact of the 1924 Act was to strongly favor immigration from Western and Northern Europe over immigration from Southern and Eastern Europe, which was sharply restricted. Naturally, that produced a huge political battle between the ethnic groups involved, primarily led by the Anglo-Saxons and the Jews, but with others participating. The 1965 Act essentially reversed this, reopening large scale immigration from Eastern and Southern Europe, but relatively few Europeans took advantage of the opportunity.

  146. Adûnâi says: • Website
    @Dr. Robert Morgan

    > “The “invasion” of the US and Europe is to a large extent only made possible by these technological developments.”

    You are living in as much of a bubble as the pro-Russian Americans praising the Western puppet Putin. Comically insane. You are ignoring another reality of the industrial civilisation – mass-scale genocide. The railroad doesn’t choose whom to transport – Negroes to impregnate French women, or Jewish chidren to get burned to dust in the crematoria of the Orient. Both are possible – both were conducted. That one use has since gone out of fashion due to the outcome of one war doesn’t turn technology inherently anti-racist.

    A genuine counter-argument could be that technology enables the emergence of arguably larger political entities due to better communication and ideology dissemination. But is that even true? India and China probably experience more internal migration, but at the same time, new inventions enable the proliferation of radical Islam from Chechnya to the Philippines. And technological advancements have certainly not made ethnic cleansing less genocidal in Bosnia, Armenia or Burma in the past decades.

    Even idiotic American Christians can smell their own cuckoldry whenever they say “what if Hannibal had had nuclear weapons”.

  147. Ron Unz says:
    @Poupon Marx

    Ron, the main point of contention is not your compiling of data or methodology, the salient point is how the term “Hispanics” is applied, who is accepted as “Hispanic” or counted “White”.

    No, you’re absolutely 100% mistaken. Of course I’d taken that racial misclassification issue into account—I’m not a total idiot! Getting your information from random, ignorant Tweets isn’t a good idea. You obviously haven’t bothered reading any of the my articles, so I certainly won’t bother responding to any of your further complaints.

    Like I said, nearly all the more prominent rightwingers or WN-types who’ve carefully looked into the issue have gradually recognized that my 2010 analysis was completely correct, which is why you don’t hear much from them about “Hispanic crime” these days.

  148. Richard B says:
    @Ron Unz

    From Ron’s comment #2

    The history is very simple….
    The huge rise in Latin American immigration after 1965 was due to the enormous population growth in that region and came in spite of the 1965 Act rather because of it.

    Ron’s response to HamburgerToday comment #109

    It’s really not complicated. Mexico and the rest of Latin America underwent a huge population explosion around that time, so large numbers came north. Prior to that, Mexico had always been under-populated, so immigration had been minimal.

    The difficulty here is the naive use of “cause” found in Ron’s thinking regarding Latin American immigration. The notion of “cause” used in the above two quotes is that the population explosion caused mass immigration. What I am missing from his analysis is any intervening variable.

    It is not at all the case that the population explosion causes mass immigration. Rather, there is the fact – which Mr. Unz has so strikingly missed that one is quite staggered by it – that a power-hungry Jewish elite with an open and unapologetic antipathy toward the host population of the United States whose social institutions in general and Foreign, Domestic and Economic Policies in particular they controlled then and still control now.

    Conclusion: The population explosion was exploited by people whose intention was the destruction of the free world. This was simply one spoke in the wheel that the hostile elite has been rolling over the country for decades in its attempts to destroy it – forever.

    Unfortunately, all these individuals have the facts exactly backwards and upside-down. The 1965 Act didn’t OPEN America’s borders, instead it largely CLOSED America’s borders.

    From Wikipedia:
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_and_Nationality_Act_of_1965

    Though proponents of the bill had argued that it would not have a significant effect on the total level of immigration or the demographic mix of the U.S, the act greatly increased the total number of immigrants as well as the share of immigrants from Asia and Africa.

    That politicians lie need come as no surprise. In any event, the point being that The Immigration Act of 1965 was always intended as being a part of the hostile elite’s efforts to achieve Full Spectrum Dominance. Which itself depended in large measure upon changing the demographics of the USA.

    Voice was given to this, albeit indirectly, before 1965. For example, from Jacob Javitz dated 1951.
    ‘Let Us Open Again the Gates’; A congressman says that we need, and can absorb, ten million immigrants within the next twenty years. ‘Let Us Open Again the Gates’
    THE wealth of America is its people. We are a conglomerate nation that has drawn upon every race and breed of man on the face of the earth. Out of their diverse talents and traditions we have distilled something that is unique and, to us, priceless–the American character.
    https://www.nytimes.com/1951/07/08/archives/let-us-open-again-the-gates-a-congressman-says-that-we-need-and-can.html

    From this perspective it would appear as if Mr. Unz is working out of the same tradition.

    Sometimes blatant factual errors can become endemic in an ideological community and prove very difficult to correct. But continuing to promote them destroys the credibility of their advocates.

    Worse than factual errors are factual omissions. They do far more to destroy one’s credibility. The reason is simple. Factual errors are attributable to human imperfection, and factual omissions aren’t.

    • Agree: Robert Dolan
  149. Robert Dolan: “You are not making any sense here.”

    You’re just not following the argument. As Ron Unz said in #137, quite correctly:

    Basically, prior to the 1965 Act we had an “open borders” policy with Mexico, the rest of Latin America, and the Caribbean. So if not for the 1965 Act, I’d guess that 100 million immigrants, including the entire population of Haiti, would probably have moved to America during the 1980s and 1990s.

    Neither you nor MacDonald have an answer to that. If the 1965 Act was a Jewish conspiracy, it was an extraordinarily inept one. If they had defended the 1924 Act’s policy of unlimited immigration from all countries in the Western hemisphere instead of changing it to a quota system, every negro in Haiti and Brazil would probably be living in the USA now, plus at least half of Mexico, Central and S. America.

    A mystery is why MacDonald apparently thought that nobody would see this gigantic hole in his argument. Of course, maybe he missed it himself! If he did see it, he must think his followers are very stupid.

  150. Adûnâi: “You are ignoring another reality of the industrial civilisation – mass-scale genocide. The railroad doesn’t choose whom to transport – Negroes to impregnate French women, or Jewish chidren to get burned to dust in the crematoria of the Orient. Both are possible – both were conducted.”

    Hitler lost. The Soviet empire collapsed. The lesson of history appears to be that nations or groups that are too brutal are not victorious in the Darwinian struggle for life. Why this is so is a very interesting question; a question that so far you’ve been unable to answer, and indeed, refuse to come to grips with at all.

    As for choice, the people behind the Green Revolution didn’t choose to cause a population explosion in the Third World. That wasn’t their intent. Likewise, the people behind the invention and construction of “improved” transportation techniques didn’t choose to do it because they wanted to move half the population of the Western hemisphere into the USA. They had nothing like that in mind. All of it was just an unintended side effect. They wanted the benefits of “Progress”, but didn’t see the consequences.

    • Replies: @HornetHole
  151. All the talk about the 1965 act misses the point: immigration – in these numbers and from these sources – is monumentally undesirable. Which act to blame it on is of secondary importance.

    As for Ron, he, just like 99% of Jews, has always been a very enthusiastic immigration-booster. I am not. By my own strict rules, my predecessors wouldn’t have been allowed into either America or Australia, but so what? Truth is truth. If mass immigration was a stupid idea one hundred years ago, it’s a many, many times stupider idea today. Nothing could be more obvious to me.

    • Replies: @Trinity
  152. @Dr. Robert Morgan

    I think the primary Jewish interest was to especially open eastern Europe for immigration into the US, because the majority of European Jews lived there. In other words the 1965 immigration act was not a conspiracy to make the US multiracial, but to secure a safe haven for Jews. When the secondary motive came into play needs further research. It surely is in full swing now.

    • Replies: @Robert Dolan
  153. Ron Unz says:

    Incidentally, for those who haven’t already read it, I’ve very highly recommend the 1914 book on these issues by E.A. Ross, one of America’s greatest early sociologists:

    https://www.unz.com/book/e_a_ross__the-old-world-in-the-new/

  154. Trinity says:
    @silviosilver

    (((They))) are not pro-immigration when it comes to (((their))) neighborhoods or muh Israel.

    The Jew isn’t really pro-immigration, the kike only pushes open borders for White nations and only wants nonwhite invaders to overcome Whites through forced assimilation.”War By Deception.” Racist Jewish supremacists have declared war on Whites and White nations. The Jew has no love for Blacks and Browns but only uses them as biological weapons of mass destruction against Whites. Look at how Israel treated Blacks who immigrated to Israel.

    Greater Israel is the planned escape route for Jews if or when Europe and America become mutt third world shitholes like Brazil.

    • Agree: Robert Dolan
  155. Comments related to how a dynamic USA declined, collapsed or otherwise suddenly suffered a lack of competitiveness interest me. My take on it as an Irishman who worked for the USAF in the early sixties is as follows. The USA has been in relative decline since 1946, it started out at a very slow rate up until the Reagan era when it reached a rate which could no longer be ignored. Since the beginning of nation states the fully developed being overtaken by the lesser developed has been unstoppable. There is a Histomap at visualcapitalist dot com slash histomap that lays out history of empires over the last 4000 years.

  156. @Franklin Ryckaert

    There absolutely WAS a frantic push by organized jewry to make EVERY white country multi-racial.

    FFS, it started before Horace Kallen.

    Macdonald details what happened to change our immigration policies, the people involved
    (all jews for some odd reason) dates, their legislation, their comments, etc., using the Congressional Record as well as many sources from the jews themselves.

    This “jews dindu nuffin” isn’t working with me.

    Anyone with half a brain can SEE that it would be IMPOSSIBLE for each and every white nation on earth to be slammed with MASSIVE third world immigration at the same fucking TIME, if there wasn’t some hidden hand engineering the destruction. It’s an absurd bit of gaslighting to try to convince me that the largest human migrations in the history of man were spontaneous and without cause.

    Silliness.

    It’s just a “coincidence” that whites are going to become a hated MINORITY in every white nation on earth at the exact same time in history…..and it’s something that well…..it “just happened.”

    No, it didn’t just happen. Organized jewry FORCED these nation wrecking policies on every white nation on earth so they could feel more secure.

    The Catholic Church played a part in it, yes…..they want more butts in the church pews.

    But Catholics don’t hold a great deal of political power….certainly nothing compared to the jewish lobby.

    There is no way to get around the facts regarding the involvement of organized jewry in reference to immigration and the push for diversity.

    I would go as far as to say that without the jews push for diversity, it NEVER would have happened.

  157. Richard B says:
    @Dr. Robert Morgan

    Basically, prior to the 1965 Act we had an “open borders” policy with Mexico, the rest of Latin America, and the Caribbean. So if not for the 1965 Act, I’d guess that 100 million immigrants, including the entire population of Haiti, would probably have moved to America during the 1980s and 1990s.

    That’s not at all an impressive argument. And it’s certainly not conclusive. In any event, it’s no coincidence that it was constructed long after the WN-types, as Ron likes to refer to them, had already directed attention to it.

    This isn’t the first time Jewish Supremacy has engaged in a bold inversion of reality. Whether it’s putting a God on a Cross 2,000 years ago or calling a man a woman and visa versa today, and anything in between, like as Nietzsche pointed out, calling Strong “bad” and Weak “good.” Jewish Supremacy has been inverting reality for a very long time.

    So doing that to a factual claim made by a perceived enemy (obstacle to JSI’s lust for power and sadomasochistic domination) is small potatoes. In fact, the more obvious the claim the less JSI can resist the bold inversion. It isn’t called Chutzpah for nothing.

    Regarding the passage quoted above. prior to the 1965 Act we had an “open borders” policy with Mexico, the rest of Latin America, and the Caribbean.

    Exactly when it didn’t matter. Besdies, if they had tried that after WWII the reaction of the host population would have been, well, different. After all, only 12 years before the 1965 Immigration Act they had successfully and rightly put the Rosenbergs to death.

    Besides, in two separate occasions Ron presents the population explosion in Latin America as the casual force behind its mass immigration to the USA. His omission of any intervening variable, such as the hostile elite, or one prefers, Jewish Supremacy Inc., who controls the foreign, domestic and economic policies of the United States.

    And the key point here is, and as long as we’re on the subject of the bold inversion of reality, unlike the imaginary White Supremacy (a smear emanating from the bowels of Jewish Supremacy Inc.) the very real Jewish Supremacy Inc. is real exactly because it has the power to effectuate their insane demands and get away with it It also has the power to lie with impunity while punishing others for pointing out the obvious.

    That’s “supremacy.”

    • Replies: @Adûnâi
    , @Mike Tre
  158. Dually says:
    @Trinity

    poor and working class Whites

    How many of them, do you think, owned slaves prior to 1865? Slave owning was a rich man’s game. How many, do you think, have had to pay the price in affirmative action, tokenism, ethnically cleansed neighborhoods and asset stripping of the industrial belt since 1964?

    Primary purpose of the “elite” (really just a “clique”) is to keep the boot on the neck of the white poor and working class – that is, while they’re not being fed into the military industrial complex.

    • Agree: JackOH, Trinity
  159. Richard B: “That’s not at all an impressive argument. And it’s certainly not conclusive. In any event, it’s no coincidence that it was constructed long after the WN-types, as Ron likes to refer to them, had already directed attention to it.”

    The 1924 Act states:

    Non-quota immigrants.

    Sec. 4. (c) An immigrant who was born in the Dominion of Canada, Newfoundland, the Republic of Mexico, the Republic of Cuba, the Republics of Haiti, the Dominican Republic, the Canal Zone, or an independent country of Central or South America, and his wife, and his unmarried children under 18 years of age, if accompanying or following to join him;

    Seems pretty clear to me, as does the idea that idea that all the impoverished in the Western hemisphere would flock to a rich America if it still had that policy in place. They come to the US for their own benefit, not because the Jews want them to.

    I’m not sure what you’re trying to imply by saying that Ron’s argument “was constructed long after the WN-types … had already directed attention to it.” I’ve been pointing out this problem with MacDonald’s theory for decades, but I wouldn’t necessarily assume Ron got the argument from me. It ought to be plain as day to anyone who takes the trouble to read the 1924 Act. Besides, as Ron said, in CoC MacDonald himself admits this “open borders” policy was part of the 1924 Act. Evidently he just didn’t understand that it completely invalidates his central thesis. If, as MacDonald contends, the Jews’ main purpose in 1965 was to create a multicultural society in which they could feel more comfortable, it would have made far more sense for them to defend the 1924 Act than scrap it in favor of a quota system. And too, with the border open to everyone born in the Western hemisphere, the 1924 Act can in no way be called a defense of white racial interests. But, quite inexplicably, that is the way that MacDonald has characterized it.

    Richard B: “[The 1924 Act opened the borders e]xactly when it didn’t matter. ”

    The disastrous effects depended upon future developments that no one foresaw. That’s often the way it goes with technology.

    • Replies: @Robert Dolan
    , @Anon
  160. @Dr. Robert Morgan

    You are soooooooooooooooooooo full of shit.

    Illegal immigration HAS been juiced by the jews by the refusal to enforce our LAWS.

    As I write this JEW Mayorkas is distributing illegals all over the country and especially in WHITE areas. They are put on a bus or a plane and none of them are sent back, not even the VIOLENT ones.

    You LIAR……the 1924 act was designed to keep the nation white for the people who built this country. It was based on country of origin and Europe was favored.

    Every statement from EVERYONE involved STRESSED that the act was being done to promote diversity and multiculturalism…..but they LIED and claimed that it wouldn’t change the demographics.

    Their claims were obviously LIES because you can’t open the floodgates and at the same time preserve the original stock.

    You can’t claim that these are developments that no one could predict because a slew of white leaders DID predict EXACTLY what was going to happen.

  161. You cannot be so disingenuous to claim that nobody knew what the 1965 act would do and that jews had nothing to do with it.

    jews were balls deep in writing the legislation and they knew EXACTLY what it would do.

    Steven Steinlight has pleaded for jewish leadership to back the fuck off of massive third world immigration because he knows it’s bad for the jews in the long run. He worries about muslims and rising anti-semitism.

  162. Adûnâi says: • Website
    @Richard B

    > “After all, only 12 years before the 1965 Immigration Act they had successfully and rightly put the Rosenbergs to death.”

    And 11 years earlier, in 1954, the Americans abolished racial segregation in schools, so that their fair children could mingle with those swarthy demons from hell. Or do you see no issue with racial miscegenation? It’s incredible how anyone can praise the Christian West at all after 1776/89 and before 1933. The very fact that the Jews were allowed in, that the Japanese were shared the technological know-how, that the Hindus and the Philippino increased in numbers says everything one needs to know about this most wondrous of suicides.

  163. Anon[222] • Disclaimer says:
    @Dr. Robert Morgan

    Didn’t the 1924 Act specify quotas based on existing demographic percentages? If so, then most of non-White Haiti and South America et al could not have moved to the U.S. under the Act. Their immigration would have wrecked the existing demographic percentages.

    I believe this is the reason why the 1924 Act was characterized as pro-Nordic, and why its detractors were so outraged by it. If the quotas were based on existing demographic percentages, then since the U.S. at that time was something like 90% Northern European, the Act ensured that the U.S. would remain such, i.e. “Nordic.”

    The 1965 Act’s “quota shifting” that Ron refers to appears to be a shifting away from Northern Europe and toward Eastern Europe, i.e., closing off Nordics and favoring Jews. Notice that the 1924 Act’s loudest detractors were Jews.

    • Replies: @Random Anonymous
  164. @Observator

    There was something like two distinct Presidential races going on in 1860…Breckinridge vs. Burr ( I believe, in the South ) & Lincoln vs. Douglas in the North..which pretty much means that they had already become two separate countries..

  165. Anon[222]: “Didn’t the 1924 Act specify quotas based on existing demographic percentages? If so, then most of non-White Haiti and South America et al could not have moved to the U.S. under the Act. Their immigration would have wrecked the existing demographic percentages.”

    The quotas were for Europe, and as MacDonald acknowledges, were not being filled anyway. There was NO quota for anyone in the Western hemisphere; no limit at all. See the text of the 1924 Act I quoted above in #167.

    • Replies: @Anon
  166. @Anon

    Doesn’t the comment you’re replying to clearly quote the law as saying that most of non-White Haiti and South America et al you refer to would be “non-quota immigrants”?

  167. Anon[222] • Disclaimer says:
    @Dr. Robert Morgan

    Thanks. It seems the 1924 Act then was focused on keeping out most lower class or revolution-minded Jews (Eastern Europe) and probably a lot of Catholics (Southern Europe). The focus was on keeping American Whites predominantly WASP aka Nordic, per Madison Grant-ish notions. The Kike, the Wop, the Greek, and all Papists were viewed as the undesirable types of “White.” This is probably the origin of the “Irish (or Italians) were not White” trope.

    But if immigration was almost completely open to the Negroes and the Spics, why didn’t they swarm in? Were they too lazy? The thought that the framers of the 1924 Act failed to close that door is incredible. But evidently they knew what they were doing, given that colored immigrants during 1924 – 1965 did not constitute a flood, correct or no?

    • Replies: @Ron Unz
  168. Anon[222]: “But if immigration was almost completely open to the Negroes and the Spics, why didn’t they swarm in? Were they too lazy? The thought that the framers of the 1924 Act failed to close that door is incredible.”

    Yes, to those misinformed that the 1924 Act was a racial defense by whites, it seems incredible. But obviously it wasn’t racial since it specifically admitted anyone born in the Western hemisphere, and the vast majority of those people are not white. The letter of the law conflicted with its stated purpose.

    Anon[222]: “But evidently they knew what they were doing, given that colored immigrants during 1924 – 1965 did not constitute a flood, correct or no? ”

    If they truly knew what they were doing in the way of constructing a racial defense, they would never have left the door open in the first place. Likewise, if the Jews were truly conspiring to flood the nation with negroes and mestizos in order to displace America’s white majority, they should have fought tooth and nail to keep it open. Instead, the 1965 law closed it, and immigration quotas on western hemisphere countries were imposed. Nevertheless, from 1965 on, unintended consequences of technological “progress” caused a lot of immigration from points south anyway, much of it illegal, and also merely winked at by the federal government when not aided, abetted, and even subsidized. I explained the unintended consequence angle above in #121. In a way, the 1924 Act’s provision for open borders is still in place. Good Christians and citizens of empire that they are, American whites don’t really seem to care. Are they too busy praying?

  169. Ron Unz says:
    @Anon

    Thanks. It seems the 1924 Act then was focused on keeping out most lower class or revolution-minded Jews (Eastern Europe) and probably a lot of Catholics (Southern Europe).

    Actually, the motives of the 1924 Act are an interesting issue. As I wrote in 2018:

    For decades pro-immigration liberals, many of them Jewish, have suggested that anti-Semitism was a major factor behind the 1924 Immigration Act that drastically reduced European immigration for the next forty years, while anti-immigration activists have always heatedly denied this. The documentary evidence from that era certainly favors the position of the latter, but I really do wonder what important private discussions may not have been set down in print and entered into the Congressional Record. The overwhelming popular support for immigration restriction had been successfully blocked for decades by powerful business interests, which greatly benefited from the reduced wages resulting from fierce labor-competition, but now matters had suddenly changed, and surely the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia must have had been a powerful influence.

    https://www.unz.com/runz/american-pravda-the-bolshevik-revolution-and-its-aftermath/#p_1_44

    At that time, my suggestion was preliminary and speculative, but a couple of years later I discovered that the archival research of historians William H. Tucker and Joseph W. Bendersky had fully confirmed my suspicions:

    https://www.unz.com/runz/white-racialism-in-america-then-and-now/#jewish-issues-and-revilo-p-oliver

  170. Ron Unz (from a previous article): “Sharply reducing immigration would certainly cause a rise in worker wages and hurt business profits. But considerations of profits are secondary if you fear that you and your family might eventually end up facing a Bolshevik firing squad or fleeing to Buenos Aires with just the clothes on your backs and a few hurriedly-packed suitcases.”

    If the 1924 Act was meant to restrict Jews from entering, then it’s very odd indeed that the word “Jew” doesn’t occur in it. I would suggest that your statement here is probably more to the point. In my opinion the 1924 Act wasn’t designed to keep out Jews so much as it was anti-anarchist and anti-communist. In addition to the Bolshevik revolution in Russia, recall that just a few years before the 1924 Act was passed the Wall Street Bombing occurred, which probably scared the shit out of America’s ruling class.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wall_Street_Bombing

    The subsequent Palmer Raids showed just how scared they were.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palmer_Raids

    The early twentieth century was the Golden Age of anarchism. A few of the anarchists were Jews, but some of the more notable ones weren’t. The Wall Street Bombing was never solved, but has been widely attributed to Galleanists, and Luigi Galleani wasn’t a Jew. Neither was anarchist Leon Czolgolz, who assassinated President McKinley in 1901. Neither were Sacco and Vanzetti, although Jews such as Einstein and Felix Frankfurter championed them and tried to prevent their executions.

    One thing that stands out in your commentary in these articles is how scared whites were, even back then, of appearing anti-semitic. This seems entirely due to the influence of Christianity. What else can we expect of a people who literally worship a Jewish rabbi as God?

  171. Mike Tre says:
    @Richard B

    “Besides, in two separate occasions Ron presents the population explosion in Latin America as the casual force behind its mass immigration to the USA. His omission of any intervening variable, such as the hostile elite, or one prefers, Jewish Supremacy Inc., who controls the foreign, domestic and economic policies of the United States. ”

    If it isn’t clear to those here that worship Unz for all the truths he claims to reveal, the simple fact is Ron Unz is still at his core a Jewish chauvinist. He clearly works to invalidate the idea that any descendants of Western European nations, to include the US, have a right to preserve their own ethnic identity and further, he makes significant efforts to convince his readers that immigration, specifically the bottom tier mestizo class of Central America (who’s own governments work to get rid of by encouraging them to come here) is of no consequence and that mestizo Mexicans are no different than US born whites once you run the data through Ron’s patented Mestizo Age Adjusted Reality Filter.

    Take Ron’s persistent use of the childish veiled slur “WN Types.” The presumption that Unz doesn’t believe in the current holocaust narrative doesn’t stop him from attempting to smear US whites as slack-jawed crypto Nazi’s because they prefer to live among their own kind, and not the well documented drunken, incestuous and otherwise dysfunctional lower class mestizo population that is currently invading from our southern border. Unz himself is insulated from these low lives that he advocates for, except the ones who cut his grass and clean his pool or whatever (Ola MEEster Ron!) Unz doesn’t seem to take issue with the strong nationalistic sense that these mestizos bring with them from Mexico, (ctrl F “MN types” = zero hits) nor China’s admirably strong sense of ethnic nationalism. THAT kind of nationalism is A OK!

    The fact is a sense of nationalism among US whites is a threat to Unz, because no matter what, he is a jew, and a jew’s gotta do what a jew’s gotta do.

    • Thanks: Trinity
  172. Mike Tre: “If it isn’t clear to those here that worship Unz for all the truths he claims to reveal, the simple fact is Ron Unz is still at his core a Jewish chauvinist. ”

    Of course he is. You say that like it’s a bad thing! The truth is hate rules the world, not love. Scratch an anti-semite, and you find a Christian who is offended that Jews don’t “love” everyone like a good Christian is supposed to do. I say if you are white and don’t hate Jews, there’s something wrong with you. The real question, which “WN types” like to avoid, is why the vast majority of whites don’t hate them. Could it be that the answer is found in their worship of a crucified rabbi as God?

    There are two types of people who place Jews at the center of the universe and think everything must revolve around them: Jews and anti-semites. I think Unz, like virtually all Jews, tends to get carried away and exaggerates the extent of anti-semitism among American whites, as he does above in his articles linked in #178. Real Nazi-style anti-semitism has always been a rarity among them. Chalk it up to genetics, culture, Christianity, the demands of empire, or all those things, but they’ve always had only a small sense of racial pride in themselves. Jews were let into the country and handed power on a silver platter by white American elites. Seeing the 1924 Immigration Act as an exercise in anti-semitism just feeds Jewish ego and WN delusions. It’s a folie à deux.

  173. @Dr. Robert Morgan

    “The lesson of history appears to be that nations or groups that are too brutal are not victorious in the Darwinian struggle for life. Why this is so is a very interesting question…”

    While pondering the answer I recalled an interesting discussion on antinatalism I read recently:

    https://archive.ph/VpiVn

    Especially:

    I tell these people to consider the following wager: would you endure an hour of the worst torture imaginable in exchange for a whole day, or even a whole week, of the most sublime pleasures imaginable?

    And:

    Also consider that, since the positive experiences in life only have value in ameliorating the default negativity, a satisfied preference is equivalent to the desire having never existed in the first place, as illustrated by the anti-frustrationist axiology developed by Christoph Fehige and Peter Singer. Many pleasures also come at great cost, either to oneself or to others. Schopenhauer famously juxtaposed the pleasure of a feasting lion with the suffering of its prey being eaten alive. There can be no transcending the duality of negativity and positivity, as they are fundamentally irreconcilable. Our absurd predicament is born of these two incongruent forces existing simultaneously.

    I wonder if the human instinct to ameliorate “the default negativity” of life is the source of Christian Love’s appeal, which would explain the historical failure of extremely brutal strategies. Another way to say it: While it may be true that hate ultimately powers the world, its expression is somewhat weakened by emotional desire to believe in Love, a seemingly necessarily countervailing force. (My sorta copypasta take.)

  174. HornetHole: “I wonder if the human instinct to ameliorate “the default negativity” of life is the source of Christian Love’s appeal, which would explain the historical failure of extremely brutal strategies. Another way to say it: While it may be true that hate ultimately powers the world, its expression is somewhat weakened by emotional desire to believe in Love, a seemingly necessarily countervailing force.”

    Yes, that’s insightful. I’ve skimmed through Benatar’s work, and it seems to me that his equation of pleasure w/good and pain w/bad is much too simplistic, for there are good pains and bad pleasures, aren’t there? For example, the pain that comes from working out gives strength and health, whereas the pleasure derived from alcohol and certain drugs is dissipating and harmful. And something like Schopenhauer’s idea you refer to occurred to me also, and that is the concept that pleasure and pain in the world always sum to zero, because the lion enjoying his feast offsets the suffering of the prey. Therefore the ambition to minimize suffering in the world is a vain one. You can’t have one without the other. Perhaps this is at least part of what Nietzsche meant by praising the ja-sagender. For all its pleasure and pain, the world is at once a terrible and beautiful place; only a ja-sagender can full appreciate it and accept the eternal return of the same thing.

    As for the “instinct to ameliorate”, it’s bound up, I think, with the human propensity to lie. There are lies that are told which are necessary to society’s survival. For example, the fiction that man is a special creature, uniquely endowed with a “soul” and “free will”, seems to have been encoded in us by evolution at the genetic level. People think they aren’t their bodies, but for some reason don’t apply the same standard to any other creature. If I wanted to argue against myself for a bit, I might say that brutality DOES always win out, and the USA is presently in charge of the world’s largest empire precisely because it IS the most brutal. It is the only country that has ever used atomic weapons to extinguish whole cities, for example. Also Dresden, the extermination of German POWs after the war, the genocide of the American aborigines, etc. But in addition to being the most brutal regime that has ever existed, it is also the most mendacious, and it has for that reason meticulously cultivated the lie of its own humanity. Maybe too this reveals the purpose of the Jew in American society, the “great masters of the lie”, as Schopenhauer called them. They’ve attained prominence in a society of liars due to that mastery, and established a soft-totalitarian regime that is the most brutal and anti-human of all, and yet one that is also careful to maintain the lie that it is all about freedom and human rights. This false image is so convincing that the people believe it themselves!

    • Replies: @mulga mumblebrain
    , @Anon
  175. Blissex says:

    Yet another article and long set of comments claiming that “the jews” and “the blacks” are each a superior master race that they have managed to steal a whole country from the dumb, weak majority of “the whites”.

    I don’t think that there is a single “the whites” race where all members are inferior to a single “the jews” and “the blacks” races. If there is any validity to racialism, there are dozens of different dark-colored or light-colored races, each with a different profile of sutble advantages and disadvantages. Some for the yellow-colored or the brown-colored.

    Identifying race by mere skin color is as stupid as would be identifying it by blood type, or height, or shape of ears (and all these have been tried). Consider among “the asians” the tibetans or the lapps, they don’t even remotely look similar, and compare the pigmies and the tutsi. As to races of animals, such as horses or cattle, it is obvious that mere color does not identify each race of a species, so I find it absurd to build a claim of inferiority of “the whites” as if they were a single race.

    As a member of one of the dozens of races of the “the whites” I reject entirely the claim that all hundreds of light-colored races are inferior to all hundreds of dark-colored races or the dozens of jewish races. Each of those races may be peculiar genetic advantages (or disadvantages) depending on the environment in which they developed.

    For example some people claim that some of the dozens of northern light-skinned races have developed an excessive level of gullibility towards foreigners that makes easily conned outside the environment in which it was an advantage, but again not all of the other dozens of light-skinned races have the same trait, and some seem to have a strong predisposition to distrust.

    • Replies: @Anon
  176. @Dr. Robert Morgan

    The Jewish tendency towards duplicity (which many Jews have resisted, often to the point of leaving the ‘religion’)is impelled by Judaism’s cynical ‘morality’, with one law for the brethren, and another, far less compassionate, often openly antipathic, for the goyim, and by the necessity for a mostly hostile minority to hide its ambitions among much greater majority populations. In other words a survival mechanism that often eventually fails.

  177. @Robert Dolan

    ‘Jungle rage’-how lurid. It’s better than ‘leaf litter rage’, as insects like you display. Oonga-boonga to you.

  178. Anon[133] • Disclaimer says:
    @Blissex

    “Each of those races may [have] peculiar genetic advantages (or disadvantages) depending on the environment in which they developed.”

    Not “or,” and. Each has advantages and disadvantages – and one of the disadvantages of Nordic Whites is, indeed, gullibility. Terms for “blue-eyed” exist in a few languages and mean “overly trusting.” Whites in the harsh environments obtaining in the earlier stages of the recession of the glaciers had to think and cooperate hard or freeze; high intelligence and high trust were adaptations that went hand-in-hand. So it is entirely possible for a given racial group to have superior traits and inferior traits simultaneously.

    Even if Christianity evaporated, the gullibilty or vague tendency to buh-lieve and to enforce egalitarian cooperative norms (e.g. “altruistic punishment”) would persist in Whites. It’s why we were suckers for Christianity in the first place.

    • Replies: @Anon
  179. Anon[133] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anon

    PS: The challenge for Whites in a multiracial environment is to lose their egalitarian cooperativeness without losing their brains. You would think this would be easy; you would think people who have an edge in IQ would be nobody’s fool. And you would be wrong. Environmental adapations persist in the genes for a long time.

    Not that there haven’t been attempts by Whites to break out of their “creative sucker” role. Uncle came close to rebelling against egalitarianism and altruism; but nowhere near as close as the demonology that sprang up around him in response suggests.

    It doesn’t seem like such a rebellion is in the cards, any more than a rejection of science and technology is in the cards.

    Maybe Whites will have to be convinced that the other races, including Jews, are such enemies of Christianity that they are literal demons and must be eradicated. The resulting all-White world would allow Whites to go on living as Whites. LOL, good luck.

  180. Anon[131] • Disclaimer says:
    @Dr. Robert Morgan

    “something like Schopenhauer’s idea you refer to occurred to me also, and that is the concept that pleasure and pain in the world always sum to zero, because the lion enjoying his feast offsets the suffering of the prey”

    A misreading. Schopenhauer used that example in support of the point that pain is real and happiness is not. Comparing the pleasure of a predator at table and the terror and pain of its meal, he specifically said that the latter decisively outweighs the former. Pain can be counterbalanced only by never having been born at all, in Schopenhauer’s view.

  181. Anon[131]: “A misreading.”

    It can hardly be a misreading, since I haven’t read the passage you are referring to. In case it wasn’t clear, that example using predator and prey occurred to me independently. If you are correct about his meaning, then evidently Schopenhauer and I disagree on this point.

    • Replies: @Anon
  182. Anon[131] • Disclaimer says:
    @Dr. Robert Morgan

    Yes, you disagree. But Schopenhauer did have a concept of cosmic equilibrium similar to yours, which I neglected to mention and which you are possibly referring to. Art opinied, following the Eastern wisdoms of which he was enamored, that pain or punishment is indeed perfectly counterbalanced – by sin, aka the operations of the Will. In the universe as a whole, sentience (and likely even non-sentient beings are included) always “gets what it fucking deserves,” to quote the Joker movie. That is, Will is its own punishment. The only way to escape or deny Will is pallatives such as art, or ego-collapse, or death, or (his preference) never having been born in the first place. Apologies for my imprecise reply.

    • Replies: @Adûnâi
  183. Adûnâi says: • Website
    @Anon

    > “In the universe as a whole, sentience (and likely even non-sentient beings are included) always “gets what it fucking deserves,” to quote the Joker movie. That is, Will is its own punishment.”

    A part of me, mystical or artsy, actually finds solace in folly, lies and cruelty. I live in the Ukraine, surrounded by the most moronic retards imaginable, yet the show is still going on. And if you add slightly more intellect (but not too much), it can even be sustainable. So it will continue, the birthing of children and the skinning of dogs alive. I cannot help feeling a certain perverse and deranged Schadenfreude for all these mindless pawns of the Will. Isn’t it set to triumph anyway?

    Yes, it is getting what it fucking deserves, and yet, it is still asking for more. Its thirst for gruesome pain is insatiable. Now that’s eine blonde Bestie! One good bitch in heat asking for some punishment. How can you not be happy for this creature?

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply -


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
$
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Peter Bradley Comments via RSS
PastClassics
The Shaping Event of Our Modern World
Becker update V1.3.2