The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 Boyd D. Cathey Archive
The Disinformation Board, PolitiFact, and the End of Free Speech
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information


Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

I suspect that many readers will have seen the opening monologue of the Tucker Carlson Tonight program of Thursday, April 28. For seventeen minutes Carlson took direct aim at the latest advance of the Biden administration and the managerial state in their incremental assumption of authoritarian power over not only over what Americans read or see, but how they think: the creation of a new agency within the US Department of Homeland Security (DHS), the Disinformation Governance Board.

Here is the clip, and it’s a message that should send chills down the backs of every American who is at all concerned about what has happened and is happening to our country…and about those supposed guaranteed rights of speech under the Constitution.

Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas of the Department of Homeland Security, with its immense and largely unregulated power over the domestic life of every American, announced the formation of the board under the purview of the DHS on April 27. The board will have the responsibility of “protecting national security by combatting foreign misinformation and disinformation. Specific problem areas of knowledge mentioned include false information…”

Carlson rightly asked: “What exactly does that mean?” What indeed!

Already the federal government has announced via its head law enforcement agent, Attorney General Merrick Garland, and from the president himself, that “right wing terrorism” is the chief “domestic threat” to the United States. And now with Mayorkas adding that the new agency will intervene in situations where [right wingers] through their rhetoric—in other words, through their politically-incorrect speech—“might descend” into some form of violence, or perhaps “insurrection” (like the so-called “insurrection” of January 6, 2021), the real purposes of the agency are clear.

The new agency will act as a speech enforcer for not just the Biden administration, but for the entrenched managerial Deep State and its ideology of continuing revolution and radical political and cultural change. And anyone who would seriously dissent or disagree—that is, in the view of the Disinformation board offer a “false” viewpoint—is apt to be denounced, censored, maybe banned, and who knows—perhaps in our dystopian future, arrested for “thought crimes”?

In a portion of his monologue Carlson dealt specifically with the new director of the Disinformation board, Nina Jankowicz, a long-time militant Leftist Democrat and a former enthusiastic “advisor” to the US-client Ukrainian government in Kiev. Jankowicz, be it remembered, called the Hunter Biden/Ukraine laptop scandal (which Big Tech succeeded in making disappear from most of the mainstream media prior to the 2020 national elections) “fake new,” inspired by “Russian disinformation”! Indeed, she fits right in with one of the major “concerns” of the new board: what is termed Russian propaganda and fake news which could somehow persuade Americans that we shouldn’t be fanning the flames of World War III in that part of the world.

The Ukrainian connection becomes even murkier if we recall that it was Joe Biden who demanded the firing of the Ukrainian prosecutor investigating his son Hunter’s tawdry and scandalous connection to the Ukrainian oligarch-run firm, Burisma: “I called them,” said Biden at a meeting of the Council on Foreign Relations, “and said ‘if the prosecutor is not fired you’re not getting the money [one billion dollars]’.” And the Ukrainians dutifully fired the investigator. Of course, Biden pere has had his dirty hands in Ukrainian politics since the violent American-engineered coup d’etat which overthrew popularly-elected (but pro-Russian) Ukrainian president Viktor Yanukovych in February 2014.

It is, then, certainly no accident that one of the targets of the Disinformation Governance Board is supposed Russian propaganda and “fake news” disseminated on this side of the Atlantic by a few investigators whose reputations, and possibly livelihoods, will be at stake if the feds come down hard on them.

For example: Although ostensibly a Web site on the Left, The GrayZone vigorously questioned the narrative of Russian election disinformation and influence spun by the fanatical Left before the 2020 vote, calling DHS’s “election alert spawning new Russia fears…so incoherent and inconsistent with previous findings, it suggested a state of political panic inside the agency.” Not only that, but the site also headlined a recent story: “Western media has looked the other way…as Zelensky and top officials in his administration have sanctioned a campaign of kidnapping, torture, and assassination of local Ukrainian lawmakers accused of collaborating with Russia. Several mayors and other Ukrainian officials have been killed since the outbreak of war, many reportedly by Ukrainian state agents after engaging in de-escalation talks with Russia.”

Such a “deviationist tendency” (to use terminology in currency under the brutal rule of Joseph Stalin) will not be tolerated, and the DHS/Disinformation Governance Board has already threatened The GrayZone, as reported by Carlson on April 28. In other words, free inquiry—free speech—will not be tolerated under the new dispensation if it questions the regime’s iron-clad template on Ukraine, or on the 2020 election, or on COVID, or on “white nationalism,” or on other newly-defined mortal sins in what has become an American caricature of George Orwell’s Oceania, or perhaps more accurately, of Aldous Huxley’s dystopian Brave New World (1931).

Such efforts at muzzling speech—and thought—have been ongoing for some time, and not just by the government or by the giant tech monopolies (Facebook, Google, etc.), as anyone will recognize by tuning into mainstream media or reading its online coverage of various controversies. Indeed, President Donald Trump during his administration became a lightning rod, with nearly all his pronouncements and claims as reported by what once were “news agencies,” but are now nothing more than propaganda shills, prefaced with statements such as: “Donald Trump’s false claim that….”

One can no longer read most supposedly straight “news” items without encountering such inserted labeling. Whereas in years past the news we ingested would usually offer what an individual had said, straight and without additional pejorative adjectives (even if one could tell from the context how a reporter or media source actually thought), today the pronouncement of truth or error by the media defines in concrete the person’s assertion. We no longer are to do the heavy lifting of actually thinking.

Which brings me to a topic I wrote about back in December of 2019: the use of the nationally prominent “truth” agency, PolitiFact to essentially decide for us what is real and true, and what is not. And my belief that it is semi-official organizations like PolitiFact which now assist the media in their increasing efforts to inform us how and what to think and what to write and say. In so many words, PolitiFact is a necessary ingredient in the chain of this rising authoritarianism, now capped by the federal Disinformation Governance Board. And there is no reprieve once you’ve been essentially denounced as a “liar” or “fake news,” or perhaps as an agent of that so-dreaded “Russian disinformation.”

Back in 2019 I wrote what I believed to be a respectful, if questioning communication to Seth Effron, Opinion Editor for the local, very leftwing television station, WRAL Channel 5, in Raleigh, North Carolina. I had just seen Senator John Kennedy (R-LA) on NBC’s “Meet the Press” with Chuck Todd suggest that Ukraine had collaborated, at least indirectly with the Hilary Clinton campaign leading up to the 2016 elections. Todd, a card-carrying member of the Uber-Marxist Press International (UMPI), exploded in paroxysms of anger. Kennedy, said the barely-controlled Todd, had his “facts” all wrong; he should not say such things, in fact, he could not say such things! Yet, Kennedy’s “facts” came directly from investigative reporter John Soloman.

Ah, but Soloman had been attacked by the “fact checker” organization, PolitiFact.

And WRAL had just announced with some fanfare that it would be using the services of PolitiFact to determine the truth or falsity of statements and claims made publicly. And one of those claims that WRAL reported on was PolitiFact’s verdict on its “Truth-O-Meter” that the claim of Ukrainian interference in the 2016 election was “false.”

But having read Soloman’s extensive reporting and examined his sources, which were enough to engender more than just suspicions, I wondered about PolitiFact, did it have a bias, and why was WRAL Channel 5 employing it?

Just a cursory review online revealed a number of criticisms of PolitiFact, its methodologies, and its bias.

I decided to write to the station, to the Capitol Broadcasting Company Opinion Editor Seth Effron, and inquire. Here is a copy of the letter I sent on December 4 that year. I have never received the courtesy of a response:


December 4, 2019

Mr. Seth Effron

CBC Opinion Editor


Raleigh, North Carolina

Dear WRAL,

Several weeks ago (November 17) WRAL-TV News announced proudly that it would henceforth be utilizing the services of professional “fact checker,” PolitiFact to verify the truthfulness of a politician’s assertion or an organization’s claim. Thus, TV 5 began a series of on-air PolitiFact-produced evaluations of several statements made by, for example, US Representative Mark Meadows on the firing by President Trump of ambassadors, Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi on the Border Wall, Republican statements that leading Democrats promised impeachment before President Trump even took office, and the president’s negative description of several witnesses in the “impeachment hearings.”

Invariably, the Truth-O-Meter came down hard on Republicans and conservatives. That prompted me to question the data utilized and the measures employed to make such evaluations. And just what kind of organization is PolitiFact and why Channel 5 would utilize it.

Examining a broad wealth of information, most of it widely accessible via the Internet, the conclusion became inescapable: PolitiFact, set up to monitor the truth or falsity of statements made in our political environment, itself has been accused quite credibly of a marked and demonstrable bias in its methodology and evaluations.

Thus, I believe one is permitted to seriously question the reasons behind WRAL’s embrace of this service, and why with much on-air fanfare it was announced to viewers that, at last, there was an objective source for analyzing political statements—when, indeed, there is considerable doubt about the pronounced political bias of the very “fact-checker” employed.

Let me offer just a few examples, a few brief critiques of PolitiFact, easily discoverable on the Web:

First, there is the verdict of the reputable, non-partisan AllSides group: “PolitiFact AllSides Media Bias Rating: LEANS LEFT.” Their evaluation is based on a number of factors, including third party analysis, editorial review, community feedback, blind surveys, independent research, and confidence level evaluation.

Second, Newsweek magazine, certainly no shill for conservatives, reported on June 27 of this year, that:

A 2013 study from George Mason University Center for Media and Public Affairs called into question who fact checks the fact-checkers, noting “ has rated Republican claims as false three times as often as Democratic claims during President Obama’s second term … A majority of Democratic statements (54 percent) were rated as mostly or entirely true, compared to only 18 percent of Republican statements.”

The Newsweek report went on to state: “[the] George Mason [study] concluded that news organizations overwhelmingly choose to fact-check reports or comments made by right-leaning politicians or fellow news outlets,” and then grade them almost always negatively.

The USNews & World Report, in an evaluation from 2013, also cited the detailed study from George Mason University concerning PolitiFact’s history of favoring a pro-left viewpoint:

[A] study from the George Mason University Center for Media and Public Affairs … demonstrates empirically that, one of the nation’s leading “fact checkers,” finds that Republicans are dishonest in their claims three times as often as Democrats. “ has rated Republican claims as false three times as often as Democratic claims….”

Lastly, I offer some commentary from the standard online reference, Wikipedia, which once again presents the accusation of political bias on the part of PolitiFact:

Mark Hemingway…criticized all fact-checking projects by news organizations, including PolitiFact, the Associated Press and the Washington Post, writing that they “aren’t about checking facts so much as they are about a rearguard action to keep inconvenient truths out of the conversation”. In February 2011, University of Minnesota political science professor Eric Ostermeier analyzed 511 PolitiFact stories issued from January 2010 through January 2011. He found that the number of statements analyzed from Republicans and from Democrats was comparable, but Republicans have been assigned substantially harsher grades, receiving ‘false’ or ‘pants on fire’ more than three times as often as Democrats…. [Italics mine]

As I wrote earlier, these pronouncements represent just a few of the evaluations available.

But, then, my question: why would WRAL want to employ such an obvious and well-documented leftwing “fact-checker” to present to viewers what purport to be “unassailable truth” (and thus corrections of those deemed not to be telling the truth)? Does not the station and Capitol Broadcasting Company have a duty to viewers to at the very least let them know that PolitiFact is not the shining-truth-knight “sans reproche” that it is purported to be?

Are there not parallels with the use of “information” on hate crimes by such now-largely discredited organizations as the Southern Poverty Law Center?

I recall many years ago, as a boy, when WRAL first came on the air, and I have watched it consistently since then, in particular its weather and sports coverage. But I must tell you that in this age of “fake news,” the Internet social media news sources, and thousands of supposed “news” items that appear daily in the ethosphere, what I have seen in recent years via WRAL as news often raises very serious issues for me—and I think for many other viewers as well.

It may not be possible to always offer “objective” reporting; indeed, it may be virtually impossible in our current environment when “fake news” dominates most of the national news media. But, as an old-fashioned believer in trying to do just that, I am deeply disappointed by your use of PolitiFact and, more so, by your unfounded claim that somehow such usage will establish the “truth” or “falseness” of a claim or statement.

That simply will not do. Your Leftwing bias is showing, and you owe it to your viewers to let them know.

I am blind copying this message to several elected officials.

Sincerely yours,

Boyd Cathey

Dr. Boyd D. Cathey


As I say, my communication was never acknowledged, and I think I know why. In America today those who control our politics, our culture, and our media consider those of us who dissent the enemy, to be feared and controlled, if not suppressed.

The Disinformation Governance Board and its objectives are one more chilling example of what awaits us in the new American Gulag.

(Republished from My Corner by permission of author or representative)
Hide 12 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. anonymous[139] • Disclaimer says:

    We’ve gotten to the point that we’re being lied to all of the time about nearly everything. Fact-checkers are the head liars in this topsy-turvy country. A large portion of the population are zombified true believers in this PC-cult-think religion and are willing to be pawns in acting against identified enemies of the people. Where do we go from here? Can normalcy be restored or is it too late? US as a civilization may have gone down the rabbit hole for good, joining all the other disappeared ones of the past. The question is will it be with a bang or a whimper.

  2. Voltarde says:

    There’s a larger problem: The U.S. Department of Homeland Security itself. Somehow the United States of America had survived up until the creation of the DHS in 2002. As if the Deep State needed another taxpayer-funded sinecure swamp extension.

    The DHS is yet another endlessly metastasizing job creation scheme for insiders and cronies federal government agency launched by big-government Republicans and enthusiastically embraced by UniParty Republicans and Democrats.

  3. So, let me get this right… According to regime in Sodom-on-Potomac (esp. AG Merrick Garfinkel) “Right wing terrorism” is the greatest “domestic threat” the “United States” faces but at the same time it is extremely urgent that we support a fake-country (created only in 1991) in Eastern Europe which is ostensibly governed by one of Garfinkel’s tribesmen whose previous area of expertise consisted of playing Hava Nagila on the piano with his penis, and whose military is controlled by actual Nazis who have indulged in all sorts of terrorist acts (against a neighboring Slavic populace) since 2014. It would appear some nazis are more equal than others and even the Church of Woke is getting confused since Pope Nosferatu of the ADL proclaimed a special dispensation for the Azov Battalion nazis and their allies.

    Are y’all enjoying clownworld yet? Just wait until they reinstitute the draft and start sending the boys and girls to be used as fodder for their war machine after they’ve literally fought the Russian army down to the last Ukrainian or Pole. Also note that all of the above has bi-partisan support, so be sure to vote moar harder this fall – because doing the same stupid thing over and over is sure to produce a different result for the upcoming most important erection evaaahhhh.

  4. Notsofast says:

    ….in what has become an american caricature……now you are truly on to something. the powers that be are using every dystopian future novel and movie as a template. we now find ourselves in a 1984, brave new world, isle of dr. moreau, farenheit 451, matrix, rossum’s universal robots, metropolis, soylent green, clockwork orange, mad max, beneath the planet of the apes, war of the world’s, dr. strangelove montage, from the depths of neocon hell.

  5. Phibbs says:

    Jews comprise 2% of the U.S. population. Yet Mayorkas, “President” Biden’s chief speech writer (Carlyn Reichen), and Jankowicz are all Jews. Jesus made it clear that Satan and the Jews are inextricably linked (Synagogue of Satan). Sure, Jews are the most intelligent race and also extremely tribal. Still, they have help from the prince of this world, Satan. That is how the demonic Jews have complete control of the American media, politicians, publishing companies, think tanks, porn industry, Hollywood, Wall Street, the financial system, etc. Jews are still trying to kill God wherever they live or exert power.

    • Replies: @Levtraro
  6. turtle says:

    In the country where I was born, creation of this entire bureaucratic structure (starting with das Heimatsicherheitsdienst) would have required an Act of Congress. In the present Reich, only ein Führerbefehl is required.

    I owe this Reich no allegiance.

  7. Levtraro says:

    Sure, Jews are the most intelligent race and also extremely tribal.

    Inconsistent with the fact that the average IQ in Israel is below 100 even after discounting the Arab population of Israel.

    • Replies: @That Would Be Telling
  8. I appreciate the thoughtfulness and quality of what I’ve seen here recently by Mr. Cathey. His topics and views are good examples of the dissidence no longer published in Establishment media due to the institutional suppression that this website says it exists to offset.

    Mr. Unz:

    Why do you bestow the Columnist designation to feature prominently certain contributors, but leave it to readers to comb the lower part of the Summary page to find the work of Mr. Cathey? Do you think that, say, Buchanan, Malkin, and Rall are writing more worthwhile essays?

    Fellow commenting readers:

    Questions like mine are seldom answered around here, and then only after nagging. If you share my curiosity, please chime in or AGREE.

    • Agree: Realist
    • Replies: @Realist
  9. anonymous[233] • Disclaimer says:

    Funny that Boyd Cathey above praises Wikipedia as a ‘standard online reference’ –

    When Wikipedia is the biggest, ultimate example of the same model of corruption exemplified by PolitiFact, the fake ‘internet reference’ tool totally run by malicious goons, and supported by Google in search results as prime establishment propaganda.

    The CIA-Mossad Wikipedia was founded by Jimmy ‘Jimbo’ Wales, an ex-pornography-seller working for intel agencies, a Jew earning a million-dollar prize from Tel Aviv University for his services. The Wales Wikimedia team has a long record of doing lies for any paedophile or criminal linked to especially the Democratic party wing of the USA establishment.

    As Wikipedia is allowed to have sometimes-ok info on topics not key to the establishment, and also some ‘limited hang-out’ critiques as in its PolitiFact posting (which doesn’t much hurt PolitiFact’s agenda), Wiki has the power to plant total lies and hoaxes on the 5-10% of subjects the establishment wants to truly manage. And then Google ‘multiplies’ Wiki in search results, both in several Wiki formats and in sites which freely copy Wikipedia disinfo.

    The average lazy person on the web uses top items in search, so lies on Wiki (or PolitiFact) sweep up most internet users, unless it is a topic they personally know and see from another perspective.

    The key internet reform needed, is to absolutely end all anonymity on web pages which claim to be ‘internet reference’ works of any type, ‘fact-checking’ or ‘encyclopedia’ or any similar self-designation. Every such article needs to be signed with the name and country residence of a verified individual, who can then be held liable and responsible for the lying attacks made on others. Anonymity is of course fine and needed on forums or other venues where no ‘reference’ status is claimed.

    • Agree: Notsofast
    • Replies: @anon
  10. Realist says:
    @Greta Handel

    Do you think that, say, Buchanan, Malkin, and Rall are writing more worthwhile essays?

    Especially Buchanan and Rall…Buchanan’s articles are laughable. Speaking of brain dead.

  11. @Levtraro

    Sure, Jews are the most intelligent race and also extremely tribal.

    Inconsistent with the fact that the average IQ in Israel is below 100 even after discounting the Arab population of Israel.

    That’s because only Ashkenazi Jews have a small IQ advantage, probably around 105 compared to white males in the US. All other major groups of Jews including the Sephardi from which Mayorkas gets some of his Jewish blood are conspicuously below 100.

    • Thanks: Levtraro
  12. anon[485] • Disclaimer says:

    Excellent said, Wikipedia is the biggest, ultimate example of corruption , the fake ‘internet reference’ tool totally run by malicious goons, and supported by Google in search results as prime establishment propaganda. That is correct.

    Just look at the list of wikipedia admins who all are far leftist communists

Current Commenter

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone

 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Boyd D. Cathey Comments via RSS
Which superpower is more threatened by its “extractive elites”?
Analyzing the History of a Controversial Movement
The Surprising Elements of Talmudic Judaism
The Shaping Event of Our Modern World
From the Leo Frank Case to the Present Day
How America was neoconned into World War IV