The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 PodcastsJared Taylor Archive
The Battle Lines Grow Clearer
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

This is adapted from remarks given at the 18th American Renaissance conference on November 13, 2021.

Ladies and gentlemen, we’re here today because our country is dying. It’s hard to say exactly when it fell sick. Was it in the 1960s? Maybe the 1860s? Was it infected from the start?

One thing is certain: On May 25 last year, the patient took a serious turn for the worse. A white man kept his knee on the neck of a black man for just a few minutes too long, and the country went insane. Of course, if a single act could set off the worst looting and arson in American history, it means anything could have set it off. The madness was already deeply embedded in our circumstances.

These were a new kind of riot. Blacks didn’t just burn down their own neighborhoods as they always have. They sacked the most fashionable retail districts in the country: The Magnificent Mile in Chicago, Rodeo Drive in Beverly Hills, Fifth Avenue in New York.

August 10, 2020, Chicago: Shattered windows by looters at Timberland at Michigan Avenue. Hundreds of people swept through the Magnificent Mile and other parts of downtown Chicago smashing windows, looting stores. At least 13 police officers were injured, 2 people shot and more than 100 arrested. (Credit Image: © Antonio Perez/TNS via ZUMA Wire)
August 10, 2020, Chicago: Shattered windows by looters at Timberland at Michigan Avenue. Hundreds of people swept through the Magnificent Mile and other parts of downtown Chicago smashing windows, looting stores. At least 13 police officers were injured, 2 people shot and more than 100 arrested. (Credit Image: © Antonio Perez/TNS via ZUMA Wire)

And never has mob violence been so richly rewarded. American corporations — many of them victims themselves of millions of dollars from looting and arson — poured billions of dollars into BLM organizations. Countless rioters had charges dropped. It was as if the January 6 rioters had got blanket amnesty, an apology, and Donald Trump got a second term.

Almost everything about the George Floyd riots was wrong or vicious or stupid, but the most ominous was the apparently widespread belief that black anger should be appeased by taking down statues of Christopher Columbus. Thirty statues and memorials were either torn down by mobs or taken away by terrified city fathers who were afraid their darlings might get hurt if they tried to tear them down themselves.

What on earth did Columbus have to do with what happened in Minneapolis on May 25? At the time of the race riots of ’60s, no one — and I mean no one — would have dreamed of a connection between Columbus and black mayhem. But in the half century since then, many people began to believe that every single white person is personally, individually, and forever responsible for every form of black or brown failure and degeneracy. That’s what the slogan white silence is violence means. Every moment you aren’t bellowing “Black Lives Matter,” you are committing violence. Even in your sleep, so far as I can gather.

All whites are guilty. Of what? Of being white. And Columbus is the origin of this evil because he was the first to bring this plague of whiteness to the entire Western Hemisphere. And that is why everything we have done since 1492 to this very day is a list of crimes for which each one of us is guilty.

“Landing of Columbus” by John Vanderlyn, 1847.
“Landing of Columbus” by John Vanderlyn, 1847.

Those riots — and the indulgent, even loving way they were treated by the media — were the outward manifestation of something that had been building for decades: The conviction that the only thing really wrong with the United States — is white people.

It is true that even in the 1960s, there were some very far-sighted people, who already had us pegged. In 1967, the author Susan Sontag wrote that “the white race is the cancer of human history.” She was way ahead of her time. And she was considered a freak. Today, we must honor her as a prophet. And because she was a prophet, her vicious little idea — that ugly duckling — grew up into the beautiful swan of Critical Race Theory. And so it is that today, everyone from white fourth graders and white corporate executives are made to stand up in front of everyone and confess — almost in so many words — that they are the cancer of human history. That they are the inherent and hereditary oppressors of blacks, Indians, women, homosexuals, handicapped people, fat people, homely people, foreigners, Muslims, BIPOCs of all kinds, transsexuals — and in case I have left anyone out, that while they’re oppressing every other human being on earth, they are also raping the planet. Calling us cancer is an insult to leukemia and myeloma.

The same people who revile us also tell us we are swathed in countless downy layers of undeserved privilege and live in a country structurally designed to waft us effortlessly to the top. The school district of Edina, Minnesota — a city that is 88 percent white — puts its white bus drivers and janitors through anti-racism training with a simple mathematical formula: White Privilege plus White Supremacy = Whiteness. It’s as simple as 2+2=4. As they drive a bus or mop the floors, they are spreading the venom of white supremacy.

We all know the story of the emperor’s new clothes. The emperor falls into the hands of flimflam artists — probably direct ancestors of Susan Sontag and Robin DiAngelo — who claim they can weave him beautiful clothes that are visible only to intelligent people. They present him with these magnificent — and of course imaginary — new clothes and he parades through town, proud as peacock, dressed in his drawers. Everyone goes along with the foolishness until a child blurts out, “Hey. He’s in his underwear.” The spell is broken, and everyone comes to his senses.

If only it were that easy! Our entire ruling class is walking around in underwear. Some of them are buck naked. You can shout yourself hoarse — but it makes no difference. You point out one huge mound of baloney, and they’ll feed you an even bigger mound. You explain patiently, data in hand, that blacks and Hispanics don’t do as well as whites or Asians because there is this little problem of race differences in IQ, and our rulers — glorying in their nakedness — shoot back: “There’s no such thing as race.” What? If there’s no such thing as race, how do we know who has white privilege? How do we know whom to hire so we can increase diversity? And they come back with: “People don’t have race. They are racialized.” And then you know it: You’re dealing with madmen. This stuff is so crazy and wrong that only white people could possibly have come up with it. Can you imagine any black person telling the Black Legislative Caucus, “Calm down fellas. Race is a myth.”

Or some guy running around in his underwear rages about the terrible racism of assigning so many police officers to the black part of town. And you patiently explain that it’s because that is where there is the most crime. He then tells you you’ve got it completely backward. Black people commit crime because the police officers we send in bewitch black people and make them break the law, and the solution is to abolish the police. You have to credit them with imagination.

We like to think of ourselves as a rational race, but the truth is, white people are old hands at crazy, crazy stuff. Catholics and Protestants used to slaughter each other. The church burned heretics and astronomers. We had the French revolution — and the Russian revolution. We even gave 18-year-olds the vote. But none of these absurdities was a war against us, declared by us, because we are us.

This is new-fangled, potentially fatal stuff. We have set forces in motion that — unless we stop them — guarantee oblivion for us. And the worst of the racial craziness started right here in the United States. All the nutty ideas that have culminated in what I call The Adoration of the Negro were made in the USA. Other white people all around the world have lapped up these poisons, but we were the first to brew them in industrial strength and by the boatload.

Historically, it is not what you would expect. Our country got off to a good start, and not all that long ago we were the admiration of the world. That’s ending quickly. There are still plenty of people who want our handouts, to suckle at the American teat, but admire us? Ha.

As for how we got started, just compare the way the United States began to what happened in Latin America. If George Washington had ended up like Simón Bolívar, he would have had to put down a rebel army led by Alexander Hamilton. Georgia and Massachusetts would have immediately left the union, he would have been driven out of office after three assassination attempts, banished from his native Virginia, and died in poverty. Unlike Washington, at the end of his life, Bolívar thought everything he had done was folly. Some of his last words are said to have been: “The three greatest fools of history have been Jesus Christ, Don Quixote — and I!” He also said, “All who have served the Revolution have plowed the sea.” How sad and how unlike our Founders, who went to their graves honored, beloved, and with a sense of achievement and duty well done. Ours was a blessed beginning.

We also had the good sense to start out with the best possible citizenship policy. When the United States was brand new, at the time of the very first Congress, it had to decide who was going to be American. For the Founders it was simple: Only free white persons of good character could become Americans. Imagine a United States that had remained faithful to the Founders’ ideals.

How did we go wrong? There are many answers to that question, but the race problem was always there. Of course, there were Indians here from the beginning. And, falling prey, as the white man always seems to do, to the temptation of what he thinks is going to be cheap labor — we imported a completely insane and avoidable second race problem by bringing in Africans. And not content with two race problems, in 1965, we completely upended our immigration policies and imported every possible race problem on earth.

Slave sale, Charleston, South Carolina, 1856
Slave sale, Charleston, South Carolina, 1856

And, the story of America changed.

The story used to be that we discovered the continent, tamed it, built a nation, gave it is institutions, and made it great. We built monuments to our heroes and felt pretty good about ourselves. And then — generously and foolishly — we let in people from all over the world to a successful country they could never have built. And the story today? The complete opposite of what it was. We’re the problem. We’re the only real problem. All our heroes were actually criminals. And every white man, woman, child, and newborn baby is a criminal. From birth.

What’s more, the country we thought was great and that attracted people from everywhere was actually a pest hole. We were too stupid to know it, but America was a cesspool of xenophobia, male chauvinism, homophobia, and racism. So now, when we think of all the Third-Worlders who poured in by the millions, we weren’t doing them a favor. They did us a favor. We were choking to death on our own miserable, bigoted homogeneity until they brought us diversity. They brought us America’s greatest strength. And the more alien, incomprehensible, and unassimilable they are, the greater the strength they bring. They rescued us from that horrible almost-all-white country our ancestors had built.

Now, I bet some you would have a little trouble finding Bhutan on the map, but the Bhutanese can sure find you. We now have 100,000 of them. In Clarkston, in Dekalb County, Georgia, Bhutanese are 12 percent of the population. What in heaven’s name are Bhutanese doing there?

I’ll tell you what they’re doing. And if any of them have been to college — no doubt on scholarship — they’ll tell you what they’re doing. They bring the fruits of diversity. Which means it’s fine if they can’t speak English, don’t have jobs, and live on welfare. They are saving us from the suffocating sameness that makes being in this very room so horrible.

There’s not much that makes me angrier than when some immigrant from India tells me how glad we white people should be because people like him showed up! They act as if we should get on our knees and kiss their feet gratitude. “Thank you, thank you for diversity.”

Can you imagine going to China and telling the Chinese: “Not a bad country you’ve got here. But you know what’s wrong with it? Too damn many Chinese. You need to liven the place up with — well, really — anything but you lot. Africans, Muslims, Zapotec Indians, Eskimos, New Guineans with feathers in their hair. They’ll really get this place going. Can you imagine? But that is what we encourage the whole world to tell us.

We haven’t gone horribly wrong only on race. Every ancient distinction that gives life meaning is now a vile prejudice. Men and women are interchangeable. Every religion is equally true, every culture is equally beautiful, and every child can become a physicist. Disagree, and you’re a bigot.

One of the distinctions that has been smashed, of course, is the distinction of being American. One of the greatest insults is that anyone can be an American because this is a proposition nation and being American is just an idea. No less an authority than Joe Biden assures us that this is so.

Well, if that’s so, what is that idea? Seriously. What is the idea that makes you an American? If it’s just an idea, a Mongolian in his yurt who’s never been here can be just as American as anyone in this room. All he needs is the right idea.

I’m sure you’ve seen pictures of naturalization ceremonies. All those people from all over the world with their little American flags that the goofy Daughters of the American Revolution put into their hands. What do they think America means? It means a place where they can live better than back home in Bhutan or Haiti. And what fun it must be to learn that it’s a place where you can get ahead by spitting on the people who built the country. That the natives are like beaten dogs; the harder you kick them the harder they wag their tails.

Do these newcomers love America? How can they possibly love a country where the natives themselves tell them it’s been a criminal enterprise since the beginning?

Now we have the spectacle of people from Somalia or Palestine, or Puerto Rico getting themselves elected to Congress and telling us what it means to be American. One, in particular, distinguished herself by saying that people trying to hop the border are more American than anyone who wants them to stay home.

Credit Image: © Michael Brochstein/ZUMA Wire
Credit Image: © Michael Brochstein/ZUMA Wire

Well, some of us are more American than others. And she has the nerve to tell me I’m supposed to think that a Guatemalan climbing the fence is more American than I am?

We are supposed to believe incredible things: Anyone can be American, women can be men and vice versa, diversity is a strength, and that way out there at the end of the rainbow, is a beautiful, multi-colored pot full of 160-IQ black and brown people. And at the dark end — you know a rainbow has a dark end, don’t you? — there is a huge black pot full of diabolical white supremacists who secretly run the country.

So, what should America mean to us? It gives me no pleasure to say this, but the Potomac Regime, as Greg Hood calls it, has become the greatest enemy of white people anywhere in the world. The first Taylor came to North America in 1635. We fought in every war, voted in every election. This land is stuffed with our bones, drenched in our blood. But the regime doesn’t speak for me. It doesn’t speak for any of us. Our president appointed a black woman as Ambassador to the United Nations to go tell the General Assembly that in America racism is — in her words — a cancer, a scourge. That we’re the problem.

Our government opposes any person, organization, or even sovereign nation that explicitly — or even implicitly — defends the interests of the race that built the United States.

And who even dares to defend those interests?

Our country prides itself on freedom of speech. The First Amendment. The marketplace of ideas. What a colossal joke!

Do any of you remember when Tony Wang, a Twitter general manager said: “Our general council and CEO like to say that we are the free speech wing of the free speech party.” That was in 2012, just nine years ago. It took only a few years for free speech to become, well, intolerable. The free speech wing must have gone lame. Your servant — along with many others — was silenced.

Twitter UK General Manager Tony Wang, delivers his speech during the opening of the conferences ‘Talking About Twitter’, at the Sciences Park in Granada, southern Spain, 20 June 2013. (Credit Image: © Miguel Ángel  Molina / EFE / ZUMAPRESS.com)
Twitter UK General Manager Tony Wang, delivers his speech during the opening of the conferences ‘Talking About Twitter’, at the Sciences Park in Granada, southern Spain, 20 June 2013. (Credit Image: © Miguel Ángel Molina / EFE / ZUMAPRESS.com)

If you go all the way back 2010, Amazon refused to remove a book called The Pedophile’s Guide to Love and Pleasure. Preying on underage children is still a crime in every state, by the way, but Amazon said that banning the book would be censorship and it refused to be a censor. Well, Amazon, you’ve come a long way, baby. My books were banned in 2019.

Facebook banned me years ago. Just last year YouTube blew up our channel and its 130,000 subscribers.

I have just one question for these people: What are you afraid of? If what we say is so stupid and wrong, surely any C-average high school kid can see right through.

I guess not. All those brainy people on the Left, all those millionaires in Silicon Valley — not even they can figure out how to explain why we’re wrong. Why can’t they? Because we’re right. And so, we have to be smothered.

All we want is something everyone should have. A place of our own, where we can be ourselves. I guess that idea is so immensely hateful it can’t be refuted.

Speaking of hateful ideas, you probably heard about Brittney Cooper, a professor of Africana studies at Rutgers University. Last month she got a flicker of attention — though certainly not from NPR or the New York Times — when she attended an on-line conference put on by the black website, “The Root.” Its motto is: “The blacker the content, the sweeter the truth.” Professor Cooper was talking about how awful white people are and she said — let me make sure I’m quoting her precisely — she said, “We need to take those motherfuckers out.” Extermination.

Brittney Cooper (Credit Image: New America via Wikimedia)
Brittney Cooper (Credit Image: New America via Wikimedia)

Nothing so strange here, really. What I want to emphasize instead is that in the entire blacker-the-content lineup up speakers, there was one lonely white man. But not just any white man. It was the president of the United States.

He apologized for 400 years of systemic racism, bragged that he had worked racial equity into every government policy, and said, “The work that happens at the Root is so important because it reminds us that black culture is American culture, black history is American history, and black stories are the core of the ongoing story of America.”

What did Root readers think of the President blessing their conference? Were they happy? I read all the online comments. Here is the kindest one: “Thank you Joe Biden, for a lot of the same shit that Trump was doing but with nice words instead of mean ones.” One was in Ebonics, apparently: “Fuck that rasclot.” And another, “He gives zero fucks about Black people.” And another, “Of course, he gives zero fucks about black people.” And, naturally, just plain, “Fuck Joe Biden.” And, finally: “I’m really disappointed The Root is not calling him out on this hypocrisy but making space for his pasty azz.” Clever stuff.

You see, when Brittney says they have to take us white motherfuckers out, her fans are not making an exception for Joe Biden and his pasty ass. Brittney Cooper is wise in ways that whites are not, and I thank her for expressing herself so clearly. We’re white, and that’s what matters. Non-white people understand race. White people have done everything possible not to understand it at all. Blacks draw clear, bright lines. The lines they draw are so bright they should dazzle even whites who are deliberately blind.

And so, our job, ladies and gentlemen, is to open the eyes of our brothers and sisters. This multiracial experiment has failed. We separate or face oblivion. Or worse. As Bishop Talbert Swan, graduate of Harvard Divinity School, tells his congregation of thousands, “Black people deserve reparations. White people deserve repercussions.” This is really a declaration of war. We don’t want war. But we cannot come to terms with these people. We must go our own way.

Bishop Talbert Swan (Credit Image: Mjones3927 via Wikimedia)
Bishop Talbert Swan (Credit Image: Mjones3927 via Wikimedia)

And yet, it is an enormous struggle simply to assert the right to go our own way, much less actually do so.

And I am not exaggerating when I tell you that this mission we have chosen is more noble and more worthy than the vast majority of causes for which white men have laid down their lives.

White men have willingly — too willingly — died in countless wars killing each other. And when we look back and ask: For what? That answer, so often, is, “For vanity.” I won’t even talk about the Peloponnesian wars that destroyed Greece, or the terrible 30 Years War or the Napoleonic Wars that slaughtered millions. What about our own wars, brass bands playing, men marching proudly? The War of 1812, the Spanish-American War, First World War? For what? Not to mention our absurd wars in Southeast Asia and the Middle East. Mountains of dead — for what?

Now, I do not doubt the bravery or the faithfulness or the sacrifice of these soldiers, but I tell you, ladies and gentlemen, our cause, to prevail in this silent, life-and-death struggle for the survival of our people is more noble and worthy.

And yet, white people, who have marched time and again into the mouth of the cannon, refuse to rise to a cause that truly matters. Why? Partly, it is because they refuse to see the lines that Brittney Cooper has drawn so clearly. Partly, because the fight is not with weapons but with words and ideas. And partly — and this is the great, agonizing tragedy of our struggle — because so many who oppose us are our own brothers and sisters. White people easily have the power to take their destiny back into their own hands and choose to live rather than die.

They lack understanding. They lack resolve. We will give them understanding and we will show them resolve.

Ladies and gentlemen, you live in a wonderful time. It is wonderful to live at a time when you see the gigantic forces contending for the future of our people and to be among those who see what is at stake, and to know where your duty lies. Few people in history have the opportunity you do, to be part of a cause that is not only just and moral but crucial to the survival of everything we love. Why can’t I be 40 years younger so I can fight 40 years longer? In this struggle, some will be great. Choose to be great!

Choose to be like the countless white heroes who have laid down their lives in glorious causes. The Greeks who fought the Persians at Thermopylae. The Franks who crushed the Moors at Poitiers. Jan Sobieski and his men who saved Europe at the gates of Vienna. The Boers who fought at Blood River. Those men died for us.

You — every one of you — have the blood of those heroes in your veins. Just as they fought, so do we fight. It is my honor to fight at your side, and like our courageous ancestors, we will be victorious.

 
Hide 478 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. That’s what the slogan white silence is violence means. Every moment you aren’t bellowing “Black Lives Matter,” you are committing violence.

    Which justifies using violence against you in self-defense.

    • Replies: @Rooster1111
  2. This stuff is so crazy and wrong that only white people could possibly have come up with it.

    — Mr Taylor, in that quote, is referring to the ideas “race doesn’t exist” and “racialisation”

    For sure, someone, as ALWAYS, will come in here and ‘correct’ Jared: “It wasn’t White people who came up with these concepts – it was the Jews!”

  3. aandrews says:

    That DiAngelo pic. Proof that physiognomy is a thing!

  4. Seems like Mr. Taylor has gone radical—moustache and all….lol

  5. White silence is consent to state violence. Wrong again. What silence is a defense against state violence—– against whites.

    • LOL: Realist
  6. TKK says:

    Ladies and gentlemen, you live in a wonderful time. It is wonderful to live at a time when you see the gigantic forces contending for the future of our people and to be among those who see what is at stake, and to know where your duty lies.

    Choose to be like the countless white heroes who have laid down their lives in glorious causes.

    This is the language of a delusional Horatio Alger who is not working and living in the real world.

    Aside from air conditioning, antibiotics, anesthesia and food chain supplies, this is the worst time in the history of civilization to be a white person, especially a white man, in America.

    I hate to smash it over and over, but unless you are in the corporate world, you cannot understand the GIGANTIC NON STOP RELENTLESS preference shown to blacks, especially black women. And these disgusting beasts are keenly aware of their new untouchable status. On a new project I started at my second job, the “Team Leader” is named LaRonnie. She has not passed the Bar her first try, but hey? Who cares? She was made Team Leader anyway, and the partner signs her pleading “until I pass that thing”. It is enough to make day drinking very seductive.

    Lay down my life for whites? It is the whites and Democratic Jews who are the architects of our demise. It is every man for himself at this low point, and keep your head down.

    Save yourself and the ones you love. Jared Taylor is not coming to save you when your bank account is seized and you are indicted for hate crimes with a Soros DA, rubbing their hands in glee to carve you up.

    • Agree: Ace
    • Replies: @Irish Savant
    , @mocissepvis
  7. Things seemed pretty cruddy already in the 60s.

    • Agree: Katrinka
    • Replies: @Dr. Charles Fhandrich
  8. I respect Mr. Taylor. He says many good things, and he has advocated well for our people.

    Yet, in many respects, he does little more than point out the rather obvious and low-hanging fruit of Black criminal pathology. For whatever reason, he refuses to name the Jew. If he were simply ignorant of the Jewish Question, I would perhaps not be as critical. But he knows the issues quite well, and he has been reminded of them from time to time by a host of Jewish-aware fellow race realists. His moderators have banned a host of Jewish critics from his site, myself included. Some of them were intentionally offensive, and they had little grace and tactfulness. Others were well-informed and dealt respectfully with pro-Jewish commenters. Yet they too have been banned.

    Perhaps Taylor refuses to engage the matter of Jewish cultural subversion because he wants to concentrate his efforts on America’s Black plague and immigration? Perhaps he is afraid of losing the Jewish donors that support American Renaissance? Perhaps he feels that addressing the JQ too openly will make him look like the very neo-Nazi that Jews claim him to be?

    Whatever his reasons, to ignore or downplay the role that Jews have played and continue to play in the moral and cultural subversion of the West is utterly irresponsible. Mr. Taylor is good at assessing the issues of race in America, and he often provides sound advice for Whites in dealing with it. But so long as he ignores the role that Jews have played in the demise of Whites in both Europe and America, our people will continue to miss the target and focus on things that don’t get to the heart of the matter.

    This is not to suggest that recognizing the subversive history and nature of Jews will solve all of our problems as Whites. It won’t. Yet at least we will be able to work on strategies that get to the root of our racial and cultural displacement. It will explain why Jews work night and day to weaponize Blacks and Browns against the White majority.

    It should become obvious to every racially-conscious White person that we cannot remove our current woes by pretending that the Jewish Problem is not a problem.

  9. Diversity is the idol that the Jews have placed before us.
    It cannot be said often enough that multiracial societies fail, everywhere, everytime.
    Where in this world do Negroes live better than in the USA? Why do 6+ million Jews live here, rather than in their beloved Israel?
    In both cases, Non-Whites need the White man’s technology, his tax money, and his brains. Whites DO NOT need them!

    • Agree: P. Cleburne, Z-man
  10. If one looks closely at the picture of Robin D’Angelo, then that unmistakable look of latent insanity emanates from her eyes. I have seen that very “look” belonging to far leftists, far leftist activists, ACLU spokes holes, leftist university professors and many others. Take a look yourselves and see if you can recognize that look. I can’t remember when I have ever seen something similar in the eyes of conservative book writers or speakers.

    • Replies: @Z-man
    , @JM
    , @TTSSYF
  11. Biff says:

    A white man kept his knee on the neck of a black man for just a few minutes too long,

    An agent of the State(cop) killed a citizen, and then the media provoked people to commit violence, and called it macaroni,,,. Oops, I mean peaceful protests.
    The media could’ve just as easily buried the story just like so many others when a white man is terminated by the State.

    • Replies: @P. Cleburne
    , @Mike Tre
  12. Paladin says:

    This is one of the things which gives me hope for the future: “You — every one of you — have the blood of those heroes in your veins. Just as they fought, so do we fight.” How far will Whites allow themselves to be pushed until they realize their heritage and begin to seriously fight back?

    • Replies: @White Elephant
    , @TKK
    , @anon
  13. anaccount says:
    @Vergissmeinnicht

    Yes they will. Not appreciating the fact that Jews don’t need their hands on every lever. Jared fills a niche. I started out with writers like Jared and now I know the truth. Now I know my real (((enemy))).

    That is why I pass Jared’s articles on to friends and family, easy does it.

  14. @Vergissmeinnicht

    “…For sure, someone, as ALWAYS, will come in here and ‘correct’ Jared: “It wasn’t White people who came up with these concepts – it was the Jews..!”

    First book on the non-existence of race: Man’s Most Dangerous Myth: the Fallacy of Race, 1942, written by Ashley Montagu, whose real name was ISRAEL EHRENBERG.

    Indeed…as ALWAYS!

    • Thanks: mocissepvis
  15. Herr K says:

    Quote: “The story used to be that we discovered the continent, tamed it, built a nation, gave it is institutions, and made it great. We built monuments to our heroes and felt pretty good about ourselves. And then — generously and foolishly — we let in people from all over the world to a successful country they could never have built.”

    Thanks to this mad lie, so typical of the “Right” or whatever — that it was all so wonderful, all heros and achievers, until either due to the “Jews/Communists”, or due to the goodness of their hearts, the enemies were let to succeed — the “resistance” will never get anywhere. It’s perhaps exactly this lie why at American Renaissance they don’t mention Covid, The Great Reset etc. — here it is too obvious perhaps that you can’t blame the others.

    • Troll: JM
    • Replies: @Wokechoke
  16. Nancy says:

    Epic deflection, distraction, red herring away from those he protects… the Termite Tribe behind BLM, race riots (just saw that Holly Zoller was bringing arms to rioters), ’65 immigration, the grievance theories, slavery & pornography industries, the NAACP, the ‘hate crime’ legislation,the censorship, etc, etc, etc. Would that Jared could peel one more onionskin layer down. But, he does make his false case well 🙂

  17. Ghost Dog says:

    Ladies and gentlemen, you live in a wonderful time. You — every one of you — have the blood of those heroes in your veins.

    No and no. Patently false.

    1) We don’t live in a wonderful time, but during the end times, when the satanist elites are trying to impose the worst dystopia ever, on all the population (whether white, brown, or whatever).

    2) The blood we now have in our veins, is (for a majority of us) a blood corrupted and tainted by the covid death-jab.

    BLM, white supremacy, and such, are just a diversion, so most idiots won’t notice what is really happening.

    • Replies: @RegretLeft
  18. Genesis 1
    27 So God created man in His own image; in the image of God He created him; male and female He created them.
    31 Then God saw everything that He had made, and indeed it was very good.

    1 John 4
    21 And this commandment we have from Him: that he who loves God must love his brother also.

  19. Susan Sontag…. just googled her… EVERY. SINGLE. TIME

  20. No American is greater than Jared Taylor.

    • LOL: Katrinka
  21. Jared… Magnificent!!
    My grandfather fought in WW11 (or should I say Eurocide 11)….and for what? As you said..best intentions and I honour him for that…..but for what?

    This coming conflict is SO much more vital for our survival.

    • Agree: Ace
  22. We even gave 18-year-olds the vote.

    Georgia first!

    Georgia Age Requirements for Voting, Amendment 6 (1943)

    Senators on both sides kept bringing up this minor point in 1950s debates over amending the Electoral College. Neither side wanted to being up the elephant jackass in the room, certain other voting qualifications that also differed by state.

    In Clarkston, in Dekalb County, Georgia, Bhutanese are 12 percent of the population. What in heaven’s name are Bhutanese doing there?

    Painting male genitalia on the exteriors of their homes? Seriously, that’s what they do back home.

    But that’s only meant as a prayer to bring fertility. Perhaps we should do this ourselves!

    All the nutty ideas that have culminated in what I call The Adoration of the Negro were made in the USA.

    Well, someone had to explain their presence here in the first place. The ridiculous claims made on those slave auction posters– “hard worker”, “good character”– are the seeds of this madness.

    let me make sure I’m quoting her precisely — she said, “We need to take those 🤱🫂s out.”

    She could accomplish this merely by sitting on them!

  23. @Vergissmeinnicht

    For sure, someone, as ALWAYS, will come in here and ‘correct’ Jared: “It wasn’t White people who came up with these concepts – it was the Jews!”

    I think Mr Taylor agrees with Jews– and disagrees with Protestants– that it was wrong for Tennessee and Arkansas to ban teaching Darwin in schools.

    • Replies: @Realist
    , @Richard B
  24. (((Susan Sontag))) … was considered a freak.

    Quite rightly.

  25. Anon[960] • Disclaimer says:

    Being Anti-White these days is simply cover for being Anti-Christian

  26. Dumbo says:

    You — every one of you — have the blood of those heroes in your veins. Just as they fought, so do we fight. It is my honor to fight at your side, and like our courageous ancestors, we will be victorious.

    Fight against whom? Mr. Taylor doesn’t say. Mr. Taylor doesn’t mention the Jews. He doesn’t even mention the rich Wasps and other globalists, nor anyone standing behind all that crap and financing it.

    Facebook is owned by a Jew. Youtube’s CEO is a Jew. Bezos, supposedly, is not a Jew (although he could be a crypto, who knows), but he’s not our friend either. Bill Gates is not a Jew, but all those billionaires are on the side of evil.

    Mr. Taylor is silent on the Covid coup, the Big Pharma-Big Tech takeover, which is removing all freedoms left, including freedom of movement, with the excuse of a pandemic.

    Mr. Taylor only talks about the easy target of Blacks. But they are not responsible for this mess.

    • Agree: Dingo bay rum, TTSSYF, Kali
  27. Antiochus says:

    I always enjoy reading your articles and listening to your talks and speeches, and I agree with probably 99% of what you say. But I cannot get away from the overwhelming sense I have that its over in this country and nothing we could do at this late stage would be enough to reverse the powerful forces entrenched with momentum at every level and institution of society. Any resistance we bring to bear against them only serves as target identification and foils to makes them stronger. Democracy simply cannot undo the slowly metastasized suicidal and psychotic cancer that democracy itself creates for itself and then nourishes it until it takes over and kills it’s host. This was Plato’s insight. Only revolution (or divine intervention) can possibly remove the cancer, and more often than not, that doesn’t even work. The US got lucky (or providentially blessed) in 1776 but it’s virtually impossible to see a path forward where a second revolution could succeed again and though I don’t pretend to know such things, I suspect that God himself is likely too pissed and disgusted to bless us a second time. I think it’s fourth down and very long yardage, and while those who have an extraordinary measure of faith may feel compelled to go for a long pass or an end run against all odds, prudence would argue that it’s time to punt and look for another game. In biology, species come and go and contra Darwin “…the race is not always to the swift, nor the battle to the strong, nor bread to the wise, nor riches to the intelligent, nor favor to the men of skill; but time and chance happen to them all.”

    If there were any wise men of courage in the US military, a coup that broke up the empire and restored the republic, might have a chance of success. Marcus Aurelius dreamed of this for Rome, but could never pull it off. The constitution would need to be suspended, martial law declared, all military operations worldwide abandoned and returned to the mainland to rule as a junta until a new constitution could be implemented. The empire would need to be split into multiple sovereign states and the national assets of the empire (including military) equably divided. The states would need to be deconstructed and reformulated based on some combination of ethnicity, religion and values. It would not need to be strictly along racial or religious lines but clearly some new ethnic homelands would need to be created so that those who cannot function with civility and success among other races would have a homeland of their own for safety and welfare. Once the new sovereign states were formulated and new constitutions and new governments ratified, the junta should be dissolved and the military dispersed to the individual service member’s region of record as closely as possible.

    The Soviets broke up their empire without firing a shot, which is pretty amazing when you actually think about it. The Czechs and Slovaks brokered a peaceful divorce and remained good friends with many choosing to continue peaceful cohabitation. So while multicultural America is nowhere near as rational and civilized as the Slavs, a peaceful breakup without bloodshed is more than just a theatrical possibility. It’s rare, but it has actually happened. But a country as deeply divided, volatile, violent and armed as the US, would absolutely need a very strong military provisional revolutionary government to make the transition work. Knowing the US military as well as I do, I am not hopeful that this will happen.

    If the Chinese and the Russians would take out New York, Newark, LA, Chicago, Dallas, Houston, San Francisco and DC and sink the Pacific Fleet to the bottom of the South China Sea and leave the Atlantic Fleet on the bottom of the Black Sea, all in very short hypersonic order, the empire would be brought to its knees and thrown into chaos sufficiently to allow systemic reorganization. However, what could be reborn of this would probably not be worth living in for another hundred years, if ever.

    For anyone with a modicum of historical knowledge and classical learning, it is easy to see that China (and to a far lesser extent, Russia) are the only real functioning civilizations on the planet. There are things about Oriental civilizations that I do not like, and a lot about Communism I don’t like, though China is only the later in name only. But China is an amazing place and once you have had a taste of real civilization it’s hard to come back to primitive tribalism and recognize it as home anymore. Even if you know that as a native Occidental you can never quite be a full player in Oriental civilization, at least if you play by the rules, learn at least a little of the language and culture, you can blend in and be (mostly) fully accepted by the common people while living in a virtually crime free, affluent and interesting society. From Confucius the Chinese learned that freedom follows form. Plato taught us the same thing, but we quickly forgot it if we ever really learned it. In this regard, the Chinese are more Platonic than the West, and by extension actually more Western, and likely to remain so for a very long time. As Columbus taught us (before he was canceled) you can actually reach the West by sailing East.

  28. anon[155] • Disclaimer says:

    Swastika hand and blood red tie and mustache, oh my.

  29. The vast majority of us never had anything to do with slavery in America—heck, most of our ancestors had nothing to do with slavery in America.

    Moreover slavery was common throughout world history until it was abolished by: Anglo-Saxon Men.

    Sort of reminds me of the people whose ‘bacon’ we saved in WW2. Gratitude? Ha! They’ve been on a full-court press to destroy us ever since.

    • Agree: Bro43rd
    • Replies: @Pindos
    , @karel
    , @von Frey
    , @Miro23
  30. Wake up says:

    This country needs more people like Jared Taylor.

    • Replies: @Katrinka
    , @Anonymous
  31. If every senator, congressman and their alphabets were required by law to learn by heart the US Constitution and B of R’s, Americans would be in a better place than with anti constitutional, anti white assault now taking place.
    We are under siege by GlobalHomoZioBIGsRxMIC3 hell bent on the total annihilation of humanity.
    Lock and load, it’s only the beginning.

    • Replies: @mocissepvis
  32. whoaa nelly

    excuse me,

    native americans have been after Columbus’s head far longer than any african american citizens have grasped that pres jefferson might have been having relations with his slave

    certainly one can be a tad more discriminating than this

  33. ki says:

    Will american empire go full white and isolation? Without those empty colorblind promises, I doubt the empire can find enough third-world collaborators to maintain its control in peripheral provinces.
    You can choose to become a global empire and enjoy all the benefit it can have, but you must pay the cost and modify your ethnic composition to adapt the new structure.
    And there is no turning back.
    The 2020s is a weird era of american empire, an era of benevolent.

  34. Jon Chance says: • Website

    Nobody is White.

    Nobody is Black.

    Nobody is Right.

    Nobody is Left.

    These silly superficial labels were invented by and are perpetuated by The Precious People, their media monopoly, their puppet regimes, the their useful idiots to divide, conquer, and enslave European-American nations and civilization.

    Why do so few people today employ accurate and meaningful terminology to describe historical, political, and economic processes?

    Who is most responsible for today’s universal ignorance?

    When everyone is ignorant and illiterate, nobody is a Citizen.

    Universal enslavement has been attained in 2021.

    What’s the most effective remedy?

  35. Anonymous[377] • Disclaimer says:

    The vast majority of “white” Americans cannot claim to have more than 25% of their ancestry from any one European ethnic group.

    This is why the American national psyche is so schizophrenic and neurotic, exacerbated by the addition of our Levantine friends.

  36. Anon[415] • Disclaimer says:

    The first Taylor came to North America in 1635. We fought in every war, voted in every election. This land is stuffed with our bones, drenched in our blood. But the regime doesn’t speak for me. It doesn’t speak for any of us. Our president appointed a black woman as

    Very poignant. And as a Jew, I hate to shoot myself in the foot, but for the sake of honesty I must remind Mr. Taylor that I believe the Jewish elites are flooding the nation with third worlders and multiracialists because these people can be pacified more easily into supporting Jewish- and Zionist- supremacism.

    Check out this new Jewish organization that aims at creating a coalition between BLM and Zionism. It’s almost impossible to imagine how “oppressed American blacks” could possibly support the Zionists against “oppressed Palestinians”, but such is the conniving cleverness of Jewish organizations:
    https://zioness.org/

    Another important factor in the flooding of America with third worlders is the capitalist system’s constant drive to increase profits. The easiest way to do this is to cut labor costs either by reducing employees or lowering the wages of the workers. I’m sure this is a crucial part of the demographic transformation of America. In this process it’s not just Jews but all the corporate CEOs boards of directors etc who are responsible. That includes Warren Buffett and all of his smug mega-rich colleagues.

    I also think what is happening is karmic retribution for the crimes that white people have committed over history against indigenous people. These crimes might be relatively minor. There are Indians who confess that India was run generously by the British. However the karma is bad and the avengers are eager.

    I don’t really think whites are able to break away. Washington has cleverly entangled everyone in a web of financial dependency, via social security and Medicare, via Pentagon bases and MIC factories distributed evenly across the 50 states. Everyone is part of the beast system.

    Probably the best thing whites can do is to live in homogeneous communities and to form citizen patrol groups that will enforce safety on the streets. The trial of Mr Rittenhouse should establish clear precedent for the legality of protecting your own property and using lethal defense against anyone who tries to interfere with that.

    Good luck to you sir. I sent your fear and your anger and I hope and pray you can channel it productively.

    PS This photo looks a lot like the former president Assad of Syria:

  37. geokat62 says:
    @Vergissmeinnicht

    For sure, someone, as ALWAYS, will come in here and ‘correct’ Jared: “It wasn’t White people who came up with these concepts – it was the Jews!”

    Thanks for that introduction. But in addition to that quote, I had several others I wished to underscore, including

    1. How did we go wrong? There are many answers to that question…

    There is only one answer to this question, and that answer is, ironically, itself a question. The JQ.

    2. And not content with two race problems, in 1965, we completely upended our immigration policies and imported every possible race problem on earth.

    We, the people, did no such thing. As KMac clearly demonstrated in Ch 7 of his magnum opus, it was Jewish Supremacist Organisations (JSOs) that worked overtime for close to a century to overturn the restrictionist immigration laws of the past in order to flood the country with mass immigration from the third world.

    3. We were choking to death on our own miserable, bigoted homogeneity until they brought us diversity. They brought us America’s greatest strength.

    Again, it wasn’t white people who coined the slogan “Diversity Is A Strength.” It was the Jewish terrorist organisation, the ADL, that coined that phrase. And they put that big lie into the mouth of their puppet, Slick Willie, who was the first POTUS to utter this moronic phrase in a State of The Union address in 1997.

    4. Can you imagine going to China and telling the Chinese: “Not a bad country you’ve got here. But you know what’s wrong with it? Too damn many Chinese.

    China? Why use China as the example and not Israel, Jared, as that would doubtless highlight the double standard of those who foisted this big lie upon us?

    5. And so, our job, ladies and gentlemen, is to open the eyes of our brothers and sisters. This multiracial experiment has failed.

    Failed? If you are a member of the many JSOs that pushed for this outcome, you’d have to admit it was a smashing success!

    Diversity Is (((Our))) Strength, goy!

  38. Anonymous[291] • Disclaimer says:

    OK, some points on Talyor’s essay (https://www.unz.com/jtaylor/the-battle-lines-grow-clearer/).

    1) Genetically distinct populations have developed in different environments, and their society is an emergent property — something that individuals produce during their interactions, but that no individual has. These populations exist best in the context of their own society, and reject other societies. The Democratic Party, for example, is an alliance of Eastern and Southern European descended people who are practicing the politics of their nations of origin as of about the time of the 1848 revolutions. The Democratic Party is attempting to ally itself with Blacks and to employ Jews in their traditional role as servants of the reigning political order. 1848 led directly to WW I and the subsequent turmoil in Eastern and Southern Europe, and the Democrats appear to be setting up similar conditions in the US.
    The idea of immigration and “melting pot” was doomed from the start.
    For an definition of “genetically distinct populations”, see: David Reich, Who we are and how we got here, search Amazon.

    2) Back when monarchies were dominant political forms, it was routine for Kings to contend with the nobility. When they did, Kings would ordinarily try to gather the non-nobility to their side. They would also have a class of royal servants, often foreigners who formed a “market dominant minority” (see: Chu’s books) but who, being foreigners, could not challenge the King politically*. In Europe (but not England) this system was first successfully challenged by the French Revolution, but survived in Eastern Europe until the end of WW I. Its downfall was invariably followed by a high casualty/mortality interval before stability was re-established.

    3) Turchin’s Ages of Discord says that the US “elite” (Turchin’s word) is now in serious trouble, and will be replaced sometime in the next 1 to 3 decades. It is also clear that the US has badly mishandled its strategic problems, and that the rout from Afghanistan marks and end to US influence on the Asian mainland. The consequences of this end to the China-US supply line are plain– the line will deteriorate, sharply at some point. This deterioration will accelerate the elite’s decay (see (2), above)

    4) Taylor’s essay amounts to a consequence of items (1-3), above. A Western elite has historically been unable to save itself over a time scale of several decades by relying on a group of royal servants, nor has it been able to control groups from the general population once organized. The organized group starts to think for itself, and act on its own, and royal servants pursue their own interest at all times. Contemporary examples: (i) End of restrictions on open and concealed carry throughout much of the United States. (ii) Current serious consideration of Roe vs. Wade by Supreme Court. (iii) State (Florida) level attempt at re-creating Governor level direct control of military force.
    Once acting on its own, the organized group tends to oppose the existing elite. See: Toqueville’s The Revolution and the Ancient Regime for a good description of this in late 1700 – early 1800 France. See also: Caldwell’s The Age of Entitlement to see a rather startling view of US political alignment that is orthogonal to the one presented here.

    So: Taylor is probably more correct than he thinks. He is metaphorically exhorting water to flow overflow a dam during historic levels of rainfall, or asking the sun to continue rising in the morning.

    Am I in favor of this? As much as I am of the sun rising in the morning. I’m describing it, not creating it. Personally, I’d prefer something more sedate.

    * Present day “royal servant” examples are BLM and Antifa. The decisive identifier as “royal servants” is that both are largely exempt from law and both supply services to the elite that the government’s more rule bound bureaucracy has failed to deliver.

    • Agree: Emerging Majority
    • Replies: @Mitchell Porter
  39. Franz says:

    White silence in the face of violence against our fellow whites is violence, yes.

    Whites won’t be organizing legions of warriors anytime soon, but it’s time the well-off ones start to admit the racial bean-counting game is loaded against their less-capable kin. Sympathy? No, just some awareness.

    Good work on Taylor’s part. I value his books and it annoys me Amazon chose the coward’s path.

    • Agree: P. Cleburne
    • Replies: @augusto
  40. Sagr says:

    What is wrong with America is that all rainbow Americans are being used by sociopaths. The whites are led to believe they are God’s gift to humanity. But the fact is the whites are used by their own people of the same color who classify people to two categories, useful and useless. They also believe their vote matter, work hard and make money, enjoy life. You have to defend your way of life and freedom. When we figure out the sociopaths’ game they simply change it. Their new game seems to be mirror image of everything. We have to stop worship money and definitely stop worshipping people and stop glorifying killers (war heroes). We have to call them by their name, killers.

  41. Anon[551] • Disclaimer says:

    Why …we imported a completely insane and avoidable second race…? Why not …some of us imported a completely insane and avoidable second race…?

    • Troll: P. Cleburne
  42. Anonymous[264] • Disclaimer says:

    Brittney Cooper is ‘BESE!

  43. Anonymous[661] • Disclaimer says:

    re: Taylor’s use of the ubiquitous “we”, meaning white people.

    White people didn’t finance the African slave trade or foment the Russian Revolution in 1917, or create and fund BLM or the NAACP, nor did white people “upend immigration policies” in 1965, and they certainly didn’t monopolize the mainstream media and Hollywood then flood the world’s homes with cultural/moral depravity.

    These things weren’t done by white people, they were done to white people.

    Taylor would certainly be spot on accusing whites of being complicit, too trusting, or simply asleep at the wheel for too long while the damage was being done.

    But give proper credit where credit is due. Otherwise, I am prone to think “Jared Taylor” is just a pseudonym for some intern at ADL.

    • Agree: Back_tothe_land
    • Thanks: P. Cleburne
    • Troll: Vinnyvette
    • Replies: @Exalted Cyclops
  44. @Paladin

    The European people (white) have been thoroughly demoralised from over 70 years of conditioning by the Jewish controlled state. Your views of them rising up, isn’t going to happen, well not in time to reverse the wrongs done to their nations.

    Take Scotland, where I’m from, for example? All they needed, really, was to place non whites in schools and have Scottish students accustomed to them. They see blacks, in their schools as no different. They stupidly see them as Scottish, because they’re born here. This has changed the very concept of Scottishness. They will fight for these people and protect them.

    I went to a prestigious school and there weren’t any blacks growing up. Since I’ve left, back in 1989, they’ve piled blacks in, along with more Indian sub continent, Asians and middle Easterners. Guaranteed NOT ONE of those non whites’ parents are paying the thousands of pounds, yearly schooling fees. Scottish taxpayer’s are picking that up – whites.

    The very demographic has changed along with the psyche. They are multicultural and not national. I hear rap music blaring out of cars. Scotland has been infected by black, vulgar culture. 30 years ago, all you heard was the local vernacular whereas now if it’s not one of the many English dialects (of the many English who have fled their cities, tails between their legs) it’s foreign. And worse, those hypocritical English idiots, having fled the multicultural destruction and community obliteration of their own cities, impose the same very thing to here! They create the very environment that made them flee their ancestral locations!

    Watch G Edward Griffin’s, 1984 interview with Yuri Bezmenov. He tells it straight. He told Americans the danger of not enforcing nationalism and stopping communism. He said you already have passed tipping point. That was nearly 40 years ago! He explained the for stages of ‘ideological subversion’. He spoke of the futility of giving people literature, photos and other proofs of what was going on. He said you can take them to Russia and show them the concentration camps and they’ll not believe you. He stated they’ll wake up, only, when the jackboot is crushing their skull and by then it’s too late.

    A massive cull is coming and write frankly it’s a good thing. The majority, here in the West (well US & UK) are as the Russians called ‘contaminated’. That is they no longer are from the same stock as their ancestors. They’re drones; meterosexual, gender fluid, communists. They have been so thoroughly removed from their culture and traditions, they are more of a danger than a help. They fail to see that immigration is invasion and attack anyone as racist due stating the obvious what it really is.

    This is the separating of the wheat from the chaff. Although far lower in number, the nationalists will survive while the globalists/Communist majority will perish, dying from the vaccination, boosters and/or perishing when TSHTF and war comes with Russia & China, along with dying from the elements, disease and hunger on top of all that.

    I have no desire of rising up to protect the majority of fools who’ve brought society to the nightmare where it is. I’ll stick it out, move around, seek like minded individuals and protect them. The lefties, meterosexuals, multiculturalists, homos and trannies can all rot for all I care. They’ve already made their beds and it’s one I’ve no intention of sharing.

    • Agree: Back_tothe_land
    • Troll: Corvinus
    • Replies: @black dog
    , @karel
  45. And she has the nerve to tell me I’m supposed to think that a Guatemalan climbing the fence is more American than I am?

    American Americans were minority in 1776, it didn’t prevent them from establishing Republic.
    Will prevail again against President Brandon’s handlers UND neo-National Socialist united under Anglo-Zionist command and their “international” community, once the “dust” settles.

    • Replies: @Back_tothe_land
  46. Zorost says:

    “The church burned heretics”

    If we’d kept burning heretics and witches we wouldn’t have our current problems.

    • Agree: mocissepvis
  47. gotmituns says:

    People like Jared Taylor are whatitwas. There’s no more time for the likes of him, Time is short. All White people should be thinking of and practicing marksmanship – is one round, one hit.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  48. If George Washington had ended up like Simón Bolívar, he would have had to put down a rebel army led by Alexander Hamilton.

    Instead, GW ended up like himself and got in bed with Hamilton.

    That also answers the question in the first paragraph,

    Was [the USA] infected from the start?

    the answer to which is, obviously, “Duh!”

  49. tito says: • Website
    @Antiochus

    In days to come, the defeat of Germany in 1945 will be recognized as the event that destroyed western civilization.
    Yes, I do believe China is on course to preempt black and brown America.
    The above essay by Antiochus is brilliant. I am grateful to Jared but cannot understand his misapprehension of the role in America of the Jews. We could deal with the jigaboo problem, were it not for the economic and intellectual support offered by subhuman jews.

    • Agree: V. Hickel
    • Replies: @Corvinus
  50. @Biff

    Also; It died of a drug overdose…not anyone’s knee.

  51. Anon[159] • Disclaimer says:

    We had the … Russian revolution.

    Oh, Screw You Taylor.

    Jews did the so called ‘Russian’ Revolution in 1917.

    It was a Jew d’etat.

    Not to mention the Nudelman d’etat in Ukraine in 2014.

    You never tell the Truth about the Jews, you spineless coward.

    Who backs you?

    • Disagree: Corvinus
  52. @Franklin Ryckaert

    I think the first person to come up with the idea that human races don’t exist was Franz Boas,also jewish,but yeah.

  53. Realist says:
    @aandrews

    That DiAngelo pic. Proof that physiognomy is a thing!

    Yes, she sure has that middle-aged woman shitlib aura about her.

  54. @Anon

    “I also think what is happening is karmic retribution for the crimes that white people have committed over history against indigenous people. These crimes might be relatively minor. There are Indians who confess that India was run generously by the British. However the karma is bad and the avengers are eager.”

    That’s interesting. When something bad happens to jews,you all say “Oh gawd,we’re being poisecuted by anti-semites four absolutely NO reason! It’s a mystery,why they do dis.”

    White people haven’t committed any “crimes” against anyone. The majority of Whites are scrupulous rule-followers to an autistic degree. What’s going on is jews are killing,terrorizing, and systematically destroying White people like they’ve been openly saying they wanted to do for around 100 years.

    • Agree: Robert Dolan
    • Replies: @Rumpelstiltskin
  55. Realist says:
    @RockaBoatus

    Yet, in many respects, he does little more than point out the rather obvious and low-hanging fruit of Black criminal pathology. For whatever reason, he refuses to name the Jew.

    Jews are two percent of the U. S. population. The problem is stupid, insouciant gentile Whites that allow this shit storm to happen.

    • Agree: Vinnyvette, RoatanBill
    • Replies: @HT
    , @Corvinus
    , @ronehjr
  56. Petermx says:

    “We like to think of ourselves as a rational race, but the truth is, white people are old hands at crazy, crazy stuff. Catholics and Protestants used to slaughter each other. The church burned heretics and astronomers. We had the French revolution — and the Russian revolution. We even gave 18-year-olds the vote. But none of these absurdities was a war against us, declared by us, because we are us.”

    I guess the more recent two major conflicts of the 20th century that killed more Whites than any other and led to the decline of the west are still too controversial for some people to be pointed to as the deathknell of the White race.

    Charles Lindbergh Speaks on a United European Race – video/speech
    https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2008/05/25/charles-lindbergh-speaks-on-a-united-european-race/

  57. black dog says:
    @aandrews

    Agreed. The psychotic, fixated but empty stare. Also associated with Hillary Clinton.

  58. anon[227] • Disclaimer says:
    @Vergissmeinnicht

    Do you think your pathetic INB4 somehow makes the point less valid?

    Your comment just betrays the fact that Jared Taylor no longer has any credibility because everyone has basically figured out the fact that he covers up the role of Jews in deconstructing white identity. Jared “Jews look white to me” Taylor is and always has been a schill.

    That being said, his Yale credentials, upbringing in Japan, knowledge of foreign languages, etc. are impressive. Unfortunately, Jared has chosen to use his intellect to promote disinformation.

  59. Anon[314] • Disclaimer says:
    @Antiochus

    From Confucius the Chinese learned that freedom follows form.

    What does this mean exactly? Your comment is fascinating.

    I was once involved with a group that was trying to shut down the many Chinese massage parlors operating in our state. One morning I spoke with a group of veterans at a local coffee shop. They listened to my list of all the problems and disadvantages these establishments pose, and then cut me off laughing and said they love these places because they remind them of the brothels they would visit during the Vietnam war. They said Asian women are attractive but above all hygienic, deeply respectful of their health and well-being, unlike Western prostitutes.

    I was frankly shocked by their attitude, and I have been wondering about it for the last two years. But more and more it does strike me that Asian societies have much more dignity self-respect and discipline than the West and barring a nuclear or climate catastrophe, I suspect they will surpass us and leave us in the dust of history.

    • Replies: @Antiochus
  60. Realist says:
    @Reg Cæsar

    I think Mr Taylor agrees with Jews– and disagrees with Protestants– that it was wrong for Tennessee and Arkansas to ban teaching Darwin in schools.

    If that is true then Mr. Taylor is correct…science should never be banned from schools in favor of religious dogma.

    • Agree: RVBlake
    • Replies: @Getaclue
  61. black dog says:
    @White Elephant

    I’m from northern England. I know what you say is true, on every point. But don’t forget people like Nicola Sturgeon, who appears to have the same disease as the city fleeing English middle class. It’s right: the immigrants cannot become English/Scottish or whatever just by being here. Most of them don’t want to be. But I think there’s more of us heretics than you may think. Time will tell.

    • Replies: @White Elephant
  62. Corvinus says:

    “How did we go wrong? There are many answers to that question, but the race problem was always there.”

    There for those whites at the time who succumbed to their greed and avarice. “We”, as in most of today’s whites, believe there remains a race issue, which is different than a race problem from your perspective. And, of course, Generation Z has grown up with being in an integrated society, compared to the views of some whites here. How do you convince them that they must look out only for “white interests” when they have arrived at their own decisions about race and culture?

    “And not content with two race problems, in 1965, we completely upended our immigration policies and imported every possible race problem on earth”

    Assuming, of course, that it was insane to import different races. Now. if we employ that “logic”, recall that “we” imported races of people like the Alpine and Mediterranean races in the early 1900’s, which contributed then and now to our “problems”.

  63. Corvinus says:
    @tito

    “In days to come, the defeat of Germany in 1945 will be recognized as the event that destroyed western civilization.”

    It’s actually recognized as the event that SAVED western civilization.

    • Replies: @Mulegino1
  64. Corvinus says:
    @gotmituns

    LOL, yet another Internet armchair warrior who comes here to vent their frustration, but in the end (and thankfully so) does not have the guts and guile to pull a Kyle. You’re not going to do anything of the sort, so why even make such asinine comments like the one you made.

  65. Ah, Robin DiAngelo looks like another perfect casting choice for “Dean Dickwither” in a college sex comedy.

  66. Katrinka says:
    @anno nimus

    A “brother”, in the context of historical orthodox Christianity, is a believer. God does not command us to love “everybody”. This is a false notion that the corrupted church adopted due to societal pressure. There are many heretical and anti-Biblical half truths being promulgated today by the apostate “church”.

    • Replies: @anno nimus
  67. Katrinka says:
    @Reg Cæsar

    Amazing that Talmudvision never uses obese ugly black woman in their advertisements. Brittney Cooper doesn’t “fit the narrative”.

  68. Katrinka says:
    @Wake up

    Jared Taylor is “Captain Obvious”. David Duke covers the subject of White dispossession with far more erudition.

    • Troll: Vinnyvette
  69. TKK says:
    @Paladin

    Are you willing to risk prison and financial ruin? Being locked up with thousands of savage, stinking dumb blacks, and whites and ruthless Hispanics? Is Jared Taylor?

    Most Americans under 40 are so terrified of being called a racist, they will not even mildly criticize a black person’s work product or performance.

    KNOW THIS: I look for hope everyday. I see none.

    • Agree: Tony massey
  70. Jared, your description of the Root conference is exactly why I voted for Joe. He is America’s last plantation master, and I love him. That was him presiding like a genteel master over a salon of the house slaves.

    Imagine Trump at such a thing. He’d phone in and tell them he just freed 100,000 violent offenders because Javanka has a black friend and beg for their friendship, like the good little Shabbos goy he is.

    • Replies: @Boomthorkell
  71. Whitewolf says:

    Now we have the spectacle of people from Somalia or Palestine, or Puerto Rico getting themselves elected to Congress and telling us what it means to be American. One, in particular, distinguished herself by saying that people trying to hop the border are more American than anyone who wants them to stay home.

    If you go back to the original settlers who took the land from the Indians that statement actually makes some sense. Mexicans are probably more in line with the original settlers since they’ll even push the blacks out. Whites are the new Indians. Minus the fighting spirit.

    Once you accept that America is an idea rather than a people then you have two problems. One of course is diversity as foreign races flood into your country. Secondly you hand over power to those that define the idea of America. So Whites not only become a minority, they have others defining what used to be their identity. When that definition is anti-White that becomes a serious problem.

    • Agree: Back_tothe_land
  72. Miro23 says:
    @aandrews

    That DiAngelo pic. Proof that physiognomy is a thing!

    There’s a question about the fashionability of that Jewish radical / Rockstar look.

    1970’s New and cool.

    1980’s Hyper fashionable.

    1990’s Classic look.

    2000’s Establishment look.

    2010’s Old rich people cheering for BLM and Antifa.

    2020’s Unfashionable. Dump it.

    If society follows fashion then Counter-Culture is in the way out. It’s showing all the signs of final decadence.

  73. Andreas says:

    The divisive Jew blamers will have their souls cracked on the alter of the Black Bull.

    • Replies: @Pat Kittle
  74. @Felix Krull

    It could be a modern day Monty Python skit:

    You see a White liberal professing their love for Black Lives Matter, hollering it at the top of their lungs… they then stop to take a breath, and someone in the crowd yells “They’re silent! They’re complicit! Get em!!”

    • LOL: Z-man
  75. TTSSYF says:
    @RockaBoatus

    We’re hamstrung because there are always exceptions. Outliers don’t change the mean, but it’s difficult to advocate policy based on the mean behavior or attributes of groups of people, because just about everyone can point to exceptions. A lot of us can be easily shamed (or fired) for generalizing (this, despite the fact that people make billions of dollars in sales and marketing based on broad generalizations about populations and market sectors). Also, conservative positions are more difficult to articulate and defend because they require hard choices and cost-benefit analysis. It’s much easier to be a liberal and preach peace, love, and joy, with no talk of self-restraint, self-discipline, or self-reliance. Liberalism is like a gas ever-expanding into the atmosphere.

    • Agree: Etruscan Film Star
    • Replies: @Miro23
  76. Mike Tre says:
    @Biff

    My goshness you’re obtuse. Floyd killed himself when he ingested his entire fentanyl stash to avoid it being discovered by the state agents.

    • Troll: Corvinus
    • Replies: @Vinnyvette
  77. Mike Tre says:

    If Jared Taylor wants to remain relevant within the topic of racial discourse – or rather, discord – then he should begin writing pieces related to weapons training and guerilla tactics.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  78. According to the author: “A white man kept his knee on the neck of a black man for just a few minutes too long, and the country went insane.”

    . . . Wrong.

    A Jew murdered a much hated Negro — standard procedure for all Israel-trained cops and their ‘enlightened’ US coefficients.

    Bottom line for EVERYTHING that’s wrong in the world: It’s the Jews, stupid.

  79. HT says:

    Continuing to ignore the Jew role in the demise of white America and pretending it doesn’t exist will mean no hope of stopping this quiet genocide.

    • Replies: @Miro23
  80. Well, yes, indeed they grow clearer. But we are Americans. We are not the Germans or the damned English or any other people. We are what certain parties would consider a thoroughly mongrelized people, like no other in history. Our country has been populated by the political, economic, social, and religious rejects of the world in a process ongoing for four centuries now. These were people not so much virtuously ‘yearning to be free’ but screwups who couldn’t make it at home. Despite this we are a decent and generally easy-going people. Those who year after year so tiresomely predict civil war, race war, war, war, war, could not have their heads further up their rear ends. The lunatic fringe of all stripes takes this stuff seriously, and maybe they have blood-soaked wet dreams every night, but the great majority of us don’t go there. We all know the system is rigged, but you know what, we don’t give a shit. We grouse and complain about taxes and the gub’mint, and half of us don’t dignify the charade of voting by participating in it, then we go back to watching TV and buying stuff. ‘Cause you know what, no one on earth has it better than we do today, right here, right now, and only a damn fool wants to go on a murderous, suicidal rampage to fix what ain’t broke.

  81. Anonymous[139] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anon

    I don’t really think whites are able to break away. Washington has cleverly entangled everyone in a web of financial dependency, via social security and Medicare, via Pentagon bases and MIC factories distributed evenly across the 50 states. Everyone is part of the beast system.

    As E. Michael Jones has pointed out, specifically in his work Travels with Harley, the [all “volunteer”] military has been one of the greatest tools for deracination in modern America.

  82. “I won’t even talk about the Peloponnesian wars that destroyed Greece, or the terrible 30 Years War or the Napoleonic Wars that slaughtered millions. What about our own wars, brass bands playing, men marching proudly? The War of 1812, the Spanish-American War, First World War? For what? Not to mention our absurd wars in Southeast Asia and the Middle East. Mountains of dead — for what?”

    This moronic toady of the Tribe thinks he is very clever; nota bene, the absence of the WWII from the list because it was the war he approves of because it was to save his pay masters. I wonder if the first Taylor was related to Moll Flanders, metaphorically speaking, given that in 1635 the nation forming by men of good character was still more than one hundred and fifty years away and they were still shipping criminals over from the overcrowded, merry old England!

    • LOL: nokangaroos
  83. Z-man says:
    @Dr. Charles Fhandrich

    Agreed.
    But being a crude dude, I think she should be ‘drawn and quartered’.

  84. usNthem says:

    The insanely hilarious fact about jogger slobs like brittney cooper, and all joggers for that matter, is none of them would have jack squat if Columbus had never set foot in the new world.
    As for diangelo, that’s a punchable face if ever there was one.

  85. malloy says:
    @RockaBoatus

    The Jewish issue is too complicated to explain to people. I’m fine with getting people to accept the much more obvious problem with blacks first. Baby steps.

    • Replies: @RockaBoatus
  86. @black dog

    My father is Scottish and mother English. There’s no national hatred there. I’m stuck in the middle. My anger with the English is that they’re fleeing, instead of staying and fighting back. And worse, most who are, are hypocrites, fleeing their lands because of immigration only to promote it here.
    The strong will survive. The meek won’t. Those who aren’t nationalists will ultimately die because of you don’t fight for your nation’s survival you are nothing. And my main point, other than the nationalists surviving, is that the weak, the globalists, the multiculturalists, the homos, the trannies, the gender confused, the gender fluids and all other f*ckups of society will perish. And I truly do believe it will also see the end of Judaism.

  87. @Ghost Dog

    white/black – maybe that was last century, or last year – – maybe focus on your 2) – a coalition of the purebloods vs the corrupted bloods? – Af American males have lowest vax rates – the vax is the issue now – we need to “notice” and we need to notice who has noticed.

  88. anon[212] • Disclaimer says:

    “Adoration of the Negro”??? Let’s stop with the politically correct nonsense, you mean nigger love, yes? The nigger monkey is a backward and degenerate beast and has no place within a white society. Whites have enough of our own mindfucked low iq fuckups already. Just sayin…

  89. Pindos says:
    @HammerJack

    The bacon you saved turned on you.

  90. Mevashir says:

    https://forward.com/fast-forward/384781/did-you-know-that-ivanka-trumps-real-name-isnt-ivanka/
    https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DoNs9OjW0AAndPI?format=jpg&name=large
    https://amp.scmp.com/magazines/style/celebrity/article/3127994/who-are-jared-kushners-parents-how-charles-and-seryl

    Jared is often an English crypto name taken by Jews. Tailor is a very common Jewish old-world occupation: eg FIDDLER ON THE ROOF. I find it very strange that Mr Taylor in this article admires his military ancestors for their heroism and valor, but for the contemporary situation he states that they don’t seek violence and only want a quiet place to separate to. This sounds a little bit like a set up, a way to pacify white anger and to get them to capitulate to the cultural onslaught.

    I am a Jewish person, but it seems to me that the dangers that Taylor outlines in this article are much greater than whatever dangers white Americans faced in 1776. He praises the military actions back then but advocates passive withdrawal and segregation today. This makes no sense to me!

    • Agree: Irish Savant
    • Thanks: RedpilledAF
  91. Thim says:

    Still cannot name the people behind all this rot, Taylor? Still cowering in fear at what will happen if you name them?

    All cowards go to hell ( Revelation 21:8).

    Too cowardly to speak the truth. Useless.

    • Replies: @DrWatson
  92. @Anon

    And my first thought was a Jewess who has turned Zionist, thus wants to be known as Zio-ness. Get it?

    • Replies: @Anon
  93. Jared seems to have aged quite a bit recently.

  94. @Antiochus

    “But China is an amazing place and once you have had a taste of real civilization it’s hard to come back to primitive tribalism and recognize it as home anymore.”

    I guess you will be relocating there soon. I hear wetmarkets are hiring to handle exotic species.

  95. @TKK

    “Unless you are in the corporate world” ? I can assure you that things in that world are maybe not quite as bad but nearly as bad as elsewhere. Former work colleagues from the tech sector tell me that not alone are there few promotions for Whites but arrogant non-Whites threaten their already tenuous employment.

  96. @Reg Cæsar

    “In Clarkston, in Dekalb County, Georgia, Bhutanese are 12 percent of the population. What in heaven’s name are Bhutanese doing there?”

    The immigrant influx has been present for a long time out there. I was there 25 years ago visiting my brother and went to the grocery story to pick up supplies. It looked like a third world country. I was shocked by what I saw.

    After my youngest nephew graduated from Clarkston High School, the family moved out of what had once been a safe area. Just going to the neighborhood gas station had become too dangerous due to stray bullets flying around.

  97. HT says:
    @Realist

    That 2 percent that controls the media, entertainment and academia is precisely why those whites are stupid and misled.

  98. Jon Chance says: • Website
    @AbrahamSteinblattbaumstein

    Perhaps you wish I were a sodomist so I could service your needs.

    But I’m only a boring old-fashioned heterosexual.

    Sorry.

  99. Maddaugh says:

    We are in this situation because we have transitioned from being tolerant to putting up with these people. One can never do enough for these miserable wretches! Many thought that the Whites in Africa were off their rocker, in any age, in their treatment of blacks. Like kids, they are slowly realizing that the grownups knew a thing or two.

    For the latest example of how blacks fuck everything up we need only look to South Africa. here at home we have the completely incompetent Harris. When they chimp out, their torch their own properties and that of their employers. These idiots even burn their own people;s businesses. They are dumb ! Every white man who ever lived in Africa knows you need to keep them in line. Look it, during white rule in SA, 13% of the population kept the darkies in line. Today the black government cannot even control their own.

    Every black run country in the world is a shambles where the Nigger dictator shits all over his own people worse than the White Man ever did. They live better than the Royal Family while their subjects wallow in poverty and misery. No White perks and handout in Bunga Bunga Land !

    Other countries in the world dont put up with the shit we do. Brazil for example imported 4M slaves, ten times the number of the US. Lets look at some stats:

    Brazil population= 213 M while US =330 M
    Brazil blacks = 109 M while US= 42 M
    % Black = 51% in Brazil versus 13% in the US

    Do Blacks in Brazil behave as they do in the US ? In a pig’s arse they do ! We put up with Black crap and so like naughty kids they endlessly whimper and whine.

    Blacks needs to realize that one day Daddy is going to get very upset and all the discipline they escaped over the years is going to be concentrated in one moment.

    These people are a scourge and need to go live by themselves. Every other race hates them ! They need to realize that the final showdown will come and when it does they will lose. No one else, not even black Hispanics will side with them. Even the Jews who run them will throw them to the wolves as they would have served their purpose and then deemed useless.

    Blacks have an unusual talent for starting situations they cannot control and which ultimately fall on their heads and come back to haunt them.

  100. Anon[295] • Disclaimer says:
    @Chinaman's Nightmare

    Maybe a play on Lioness too? Also Ness = miracle in Hebrew. Maybe the idea is it’s a miracle to recruit the racial malcontents in America to the Zionist cause?

  101. WW2 was another war you guys should not have been involved in,

    The people that you always leave out when it comes to discussing this topic, the money lending, slave trade financing/profiteering, porn purveying Bankster elite, get a free pass,

    Why is that?

  102. Exile says:
    @RockaBoatus

    Jared has paleocon sensibilities – these men are not revolutionaries and revolutionaries are what Whites need. He’s decades too late in warning his audience that America “is” dying.

    It already died before 1992 when Pat Buchanan won only one state primary.

    Even then, with simpler , less ambitious and much more honest (White) America First platform compared to Trump’s MAGA shitshow, Pat’s paleoconservatism was labeled “Nazism.”

    The lie that White identity = Jews in ovens was already that entrenched by Jews with media, financial and academic influence.

    You can’t fight the Jewish lies of the Holocaust and American Slavery as the Exodus (our American Holohoax) without naming the Jew.

    The fact that so many of these otherwise admirable men refuse to touch the Jewish third rail is the best evidence that Jewish power is our biggest problem. Jared has the guts to name the Black – but he dare not name the Jew.

    To know who holds power, ask who you are not allowed to criticize.

    Jared does a pretty good job most of the time serving as a gateway on the road to J-woke White identity – he rarely attacks guys brave enough to tackle the JQ – but he and other guys like him are waypoints, not destinations.

  103. @Proud_Srbin

    “American Americans were minority in 1776, it didn’t prevent them from establishing Republic.”

    After the war, Americans wanted to establish a confederacy. It was their traitorous aspiring oligarchy that established a Republic and they did not make many friends in doing so. There were not cheers from the colonies over the document, there was division that never was settled, just rammed through.

    A post by Rache has as comment with an excerpt from Jefferson Davis on how people felt about it in 1776 and were still thinking about it in 1861. The USA has a foundation myth that Americans were left out of.

    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar
  104. Pablo says:

    I love the pic of the young man holding the sign that says, “The beauty of this Country lies in the Diversity of its People”. This is obviously FALSE. History is filled with examples of wars and other forms of violence owing to the Diversity and Multiculturalism of its People. Yet, some Radicals–mostly Jewish–still promote the “wonders” of Diversity and Multiculturalism. They NEVER offer even one shred of evidence to prove that Diversity and Multiculturalism are beneficial to a Country. Because there isn’t any. Of course, the People–mostly Jewish Radicals–are FULLY aware of how corrosive Diversity and Multiculturalism really are. That’s why they promote it!!! These Jewish Radicals should be horsewhipped out of the Country.

    • Replies: @Rob McX
  105. Shabbos Goy “conservatives” are quite a useful tool for the Talmudics. After white women and the Negro, who are both usually manipulated and tweaked into their status as gentile-siqariyim , they might be the the best, and most openly willing, Shabbos Goys because they not only enjoy and love being Shabbos Goys and gentile-siqariyim in general as defenders, but very aggressively and actively dismantle and attack straight socially conservative white males and Muslims, especially Iranian/Shia.

    Sayanim and Hasbara goons often do not accomplish anywhere near what Shabbos Goys do for the “Doctors of the Talmud.”

  106. “At the time of the race riots of ’60s, no one — and I mean no one — would have dreamed of a connection between Columbus and black mayhem.”

    columbus regarded the indigenous inhabitants he encountered as ideal potential slaves due to their naivete and friendliness (and gold wealth).

    That’s the very birth of black mayhem.

  107. @Maddaugh

    “These people are a scourge and need to go live by themselves.”

    If they could understand what is going to happen to them during the next hard times, they wouldn’t be the scourge of other peoples.

  108. @Supply and Demand

    But the regime under Joe did free (maybe tens of?) thousands of Black (and to be fair, White) offenders, like a good Shabbos goy.

    Biden didn’t brag about it though, this is true. It just was done. Honestly, likely without his input, because the system manages itself.

  109. aandrews says:
    @Anon

    “…because these people can be pacified more easily….”

    Also a nation in internal turmoil is unable to unite to defend common interests (because there aren’t any!) and the populace is more easily controlled and manipulated. There’s lots of examples in history. The Romans were able to defeat the Gauls and Germanic tribes because they did not and could not unite. The same applied regarding Europe and the Mongols; there wasn’t a common response to the invaders. I think that’s an attribute of populations that is well known and those in power are students of history (it’s probably a component of political science study). The only way the situation for White people will change substantially in the US is following a collapse. In that regard, Twilight’s Last Gleaming is the urtext. A few components of the narrative are a present-day reality.

    • Replies: @aandrews
  110. @Maddaugh

    I agree with most of what you said….but blacks don’t behave well in Brazil either.

    The crime rate in Brazil is awful.

    • Replies: @Maddaugh
  111. @RockaBoatus

    “This is not to suggest that recognizing the subversive history and nature of Jews will solve all of our problems as Whites.”

    That’s true. But what’s also true is that without recognising it our problems will never be solved.

    • Agree: Mulegino1
  112. @HT

    That 2 percent that controls the media, entertainment and academia is precisely why those whites are stupid and misled.

    That is why they are misled.

    They did the stupid on their own–and if they did not believe the mass media insanity they would believe other insanity.

    • Agree: Realist
    • Disagree: Corvinus
  113. Mulegino1 says:
    @Corvinus

    Saved Western Civilization from what, or more to the point- for what?

    For globalization, globohomo and immersion into the third world sewer? For degradation, ethno-masochism, pandemic criminality, and counter-cultural subversion? For despiritualization, deracination and the prevalence of ugly urban squalor? For the immiseration of its working and middle classes and enslavement to usury and debt, and the corporate degradation of the natural environment? For the apotheosis of the Jewish collective and the reduction of Christianity from spiritual foundation of the west to beggary at the Jews’ door?

    I would sincerely like to know how western civilization was saved.

    • Agree: Fart Blossom
    • Replies: @Corvinus
  114. Phibbs says:

    It needs to be mentioned that Jews are the main drivers of all this racial insanity. Not only do the Jews give us super-stupid Gentiles an anti-Russian foreign policy and a guarantee of war with Iran, but also wokeness, cancel culture, identity politics and censorship.

    • Agree: Robert Dolan
  115. KenH says:

    As the battle lines grow clearer and Jared Taylor’s mustache grows bushier he still refuses to name the Jewish revolutionary spirit that is the source of many of the problems he cites in this article. It’s a wicked Jewess domestic terrorist who’s the brains behind the BLM insurgency against white America. The disgusting obese black lesbian women we regularly see speaking for BLM are merely the titular heads and unwitting pawns of an alien people and forces their negro brains can’t comprehend.

    I mean no disrespect to Jared but his reward for avoiding the JQ is to have his Amren conferences cancelled at private venues, the loss of his Twitter and YouTube accounts and loss of a credit card payment processor. These things didn’t happen in a vacuum and there was behind the scenes Jewish activism that made this happen.

    It’s pointless trying hard to be a “good” race realist or pro-white activist because they hate us all equally.

  116. Rob McX says:
    @Pablo

    “The downfall of this country lies in the diversity of its people”.

  117. The story is more pointed: the Emperor and his court keep on going as if nothing had happened.
    https://etc.usf.edu/lit2go/68/fairy-tales-and-other-traditional-stories/5637/the-emperors-new-clothes/

    ““But the Emperor has nothing at all on!” said a little child. “Listen to the voice of the child!” exclaimed his father. What the child had said was whispered from one to another. “But he has nothing at all on!” at last cried out all the people. The Emperor was upset, for he knew that the people were right. However, he thought the procession must go on now! The lords of the bedchamber took greater pains than ever, to appear holding up a train, although, in reality, there was no train to hold, and the Emperor walked on in his underwear.”

  118. Maddaugh says:
    @Robert Dolan

    Agreed but only in heavy black areas. Strangely, in the Favelas the drug Lords rule and it is far safer there than in say Copacabana. Criminals who fuck around in the slums are put down permanently BECAUSE the Drug Lords need the protection of the locals.

    That said, blacks caught robbing in say Copacabana are shot without all the hullabaloo that plays out in the USA. Farther South, in areas that are mostly white, crime is very low. In the interior, there is crime but it is short lived. There are a lot of bones scattered in the jungle, found from time to time by a hunter in some remote area.

    My main point though is that the Darkies in Brazil rarely riot en masse and when they do they are quickly crushed. Not so in the US.

    • Replies: @DrWatson
  119. Corvinus says:
    @Mulegino1

    “Saved Western Civilization from what, or more to the point- for what?”

    From tyranny. Remember, Germany invaded free peoples like the Polish and the Czechs and the French to sate their own bloodlust. What, the British and the Americans were to simply to sit and watch, this enabling the Nazis to carve out their own empire?

    “For globalization, globohomo and immersion into the third world sewer? For degradation, ethno-masochism, pandemic criminality, and counter-cultural subversion? For despiritualization, deracination and the prevalence of ugly urban squalor? For the immiseration of its working and middle classes and enslavement to usury and debt, and the corporate degradation of the natural environment? For the apotheosis of the Jewish collective and the reduction of Christianity from spiritual foundation of the west to beggary at the Jews’ door?”

    Lol, hanging every problem that was ultimately caused by greed and avarice—the failings of our humanity—rather than addressing the conniving and jackbooting by the Nazi Party, only demonstrates your sheer ignorance. You’re not even being serious here. Thankfully, only an extreme minority take your position here.

  120. Corvinus says:
    @HT

    Lol, no. I thought whites have high IQs and high time preferences. Yet, somehow, you are inferring, that in every instance, whites are bamboozled by Jews without realizing it? That is far fetched.

    The fact of the matter is that whites are making their own decisions regarding race and culture, which you and others personally disagree with.

    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar
  121. Corvinus says:
    @Realist

    “The problem is stupid, insouciant gentile Whites that allow this shit storm to happen.”

    That is an anti-white statement. Whites are highly intelligent, with an unparalleled work ethic and a moral code above reproach. How dare you label my race in that fashion. Only controlled opposition like yourself would sully our storied reputation. Repent!

    • LOL: Realist
    • Replies: @GeneralRipper
  122. @Anonymous

    re: Taylor’s use of the ubiquitous “we”, meaning white people.

    White people didn’t finance the African slave trade or foment the Russian Revolution in 1917, or create and fund BLM or the NAACP, nor did white people “upend immigration policies” in 1965, and they certainly didn’t monopolize the mainstream media and Hollywood then flood the world’s homes with cultural/moral depravity.

    These things weren’t done by white people, they were done to white people.

    Taylor would certainly be spot on accusing whites of being complicit, too trusting, or simply asleep at the wheel for too long while the damage was being done.

    But give proper credit where credit is due. Otherwise, I am prone to think “Jared Taylor” is just a pseudonym for some intern at ADL.

    I agree he shouldn’t dance around the gargantuan tiny hat in the room, but those who think it is literally 100% the fault of the (((usual suspects))) are indulging in some serious over-simplification. Lest you think I have any sympathies for the (((Synagogue of Satan))), I am fine with them rotting in hell for eternity. The final destination is to a large degree their own choice, not mine. That being said, none of the events listed could have taken place were it not for both the consent and active endorsement of large numbers of whites from A.D. 70 to the present day.

    From monarchs and aristocrats who could never live within their means, to churches who failed to enforce discipline (excommunication) on those who considered grace as a license to do endless evil – especially if they were large donors – to today’s idiots who can’t stop borrowing fake money, indulging in substance abuse, adultery, gambling, divorce, watching monkeyball or ‘Prancing with the Groids’ on Talmudvision instead of practicing a game or dancing themselves, or posting on (((Faceberg))), the broad path to perdition is paved with the stupid and rotten deeds of white Christians both great and small, all serving the ends of the (((Synagogue of Satan))).

    As I noted in a earlier post, Solzhenitzyn’s very arresting quote of ‘The Old Ones’ from The Gulag Archipelago contains both the ultimate cause of the present misery along with a seed of hope for recovery from it. In a remarkable irony, this very seed was evidently planted and is actually growing in a place long considered hopelessly lost.

    Men have forgotten God; that’s why all this has happened

    Those who have forgotten God (not the God of the Jews, who is Satan) will end up serving Jews (servants of Satan). Nobody is holding a gun to any white person’s head forcing them to watch Talmudvision, send their kids to the Government Schul Gulag, borrow fake-money, join the Empire’s evil legions to fight wars for Banksteins, etc., etc., etc., etc. Want to start a real revolution? Stop doing all play into your enemy’s hands and teach your fellow whites to do likewise.

    • Agree: Rumpelstiltskin
    • Thanks: Fart Blossom
  123. anon[307] • Disclaimer says:

    the battle between those with moustaches and those without moustaches.

    the un-‘tached always win.

    sad.

  124. babu says:

    Taylor is a dyed in the wool racist. Spewing lies all the time.

  125. babu says:
    @Exalted Cyclops

    You mean the other white people.

  126. Wokechoke says:
    @Herr K

    A lot of this They Made America Great stuff is that it was mostly directed at Europeans who maintained King’s and an Aristocracy. AMERICA was a proof that working class or non aristocratic whites could make a better country than England or France. So some of the American exceptional ism was about being anti White in a silly dangerous way. Blacks and Indians were just roadkill.

  127. @malloy

    True and I agree. The problem is that even if Mr. Taylor refuses to personally address the JQ, he could at least permit others to do so, particularly among his many commenters. He may claim that he does, but any commenter who addresses Jewish subversion too strongly or too frequently soon finds himself banned.

    This is the sort of “baby steps” he could allow in order to make his readers aware of the source (Jews) of so many of our problems as Whites.

    I personally view American Renaissance as a gateway to more important matters – namely, Jewish cultural subversion.

    • Replies: @anarchyst
  128. @anno nimus

    Negros, not H. Sapiens sapiens, are not Human; hominids Yes, but so was Australopithecus.
    If Negros were properly classified taxonomically, and dealt with accordingly, that would be “good”.
    A species genetically closer to Chimpanzees cannot be “brother” to a Human.

    Take your wanker religious inferences swimming in shark waters…do it today.

  129. @Corvinus

    The fact of the matter is that whites are making their own decisions regarding race and culture, which you and others personally disagree with.

    Prime example: John T Chisholm.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  130. tosca says:

    Salvador de Madariaga, the biographer of Christopher Colombus said he was a Jew, like many of his companions and those who financed his journey. What does that change?

  131. @Katrinka

    Incorrect. We must love even our enemies. Please read your Gospel. So help us God. Haters harm themselves first before anyone who are the objects of their hatred. To love is to live in peace. Hating makes you very miserable, only psychos derive pleasure (if it can be called such) from hatred. “Better to light a candle 🕯️ than to curse the darkness.” Life is too short now, bearing our cross in this world is much preferable to suffering in the next. So help us God, amen.

    • Replies: @Blodgie
  132. @Corvinus

    The British and the Americans certainly stood by and did nothing when Stalin invaded Poland and carved a bit of his own empire on Polish soil. The Brits were simply looking for a reason to go to war with Germany, and in order to do so they made false promises to Poland. The Americans found their own backdoor opportunity via Pearl Harbor. The U.S. and Britian wanted a war with Germany and they were determined to make it happen. They were the aggressors, and the war was entirely unnecessary as Pat Buchanan has well-documented in his, ‘Churchill, Hitler, and the Unnecessary War.’

    Churchill was more interested in creating a great name for himself. He hated the German people, and he was threatened by Germany’s quick rise to power and its great achievements which threatened his own British empire.

    Ignored in all of this was how many times Hitler made it clear that he admired the British people, and did not want a war with them. Even when Britian bombers repeatedly bombed German civilian centers, Hitler refused to do so. It was only after continuous bombing by the British that Hitler finally returned the favor.

    As a result of destroying Hitler and the German nation (who had sought to resist and save Europe from the rising tide of Bolshevism-Communism), the West is now ruled by Globo-Homo elites comprised disproportionately of Jews who are determined to morally and culturally subvert every White-Christian nation.

    The Brits and the Americans fought the wrong enemy, and now we’re paying big time for it.

    • Agree: Dingo bay rum, Bookish1
    • Replies: @Corvinus
  133. @Corvinus

    “Saved Western Civilization from what, or more to the point- for what?”

    From tyranny. Remember, Germany invaded free peoples like the Polish and the Czechs and the French to sate their own bloodlust. What, the British and the Americans were to simply to sit and watch, this enabling the Nazis to carve out their own empire?

    You have to be kidding. Are you new to the UR or something?

    You are parroting obsolete, ancient, Commie propaganda. The Germans were suffering badly under the Red globalist scum even worse than what we in the US are suffering now. Were they supposed to sit and watch while the Commies (backed by London and New York bankers) destroyed their societies?

    Read this, get it straight, then apologize.

    “… this entire myth, so prevalent then and even now about Hitler, and about the Japanese, is a tissue of fallacies from beginning to end. Every plank in this nightmare evidence is either completely untrue or not entirely the truth.
    If people should learn this intellectual fraud about Hitler’s Germany, then they will begin to ask questions, and searching questions…”

    Murray Rothbard, Revisionism for Our Time

    http://mises.org/daily/2592

    • Troll: Corvinus
    • Replies: @Robert Dolan
  134. @Back_tothe_land

    A post by Rache has as comment with an excerpt from Jefferson Davis on how people felt about it in 1776 and were still thinking about it in 1861.

    The fundamental flaw in Davis’s confederation was its nearly 40% African population. This turned out to be disastrous in 1861. The lazy cowards refused to fight and refused to work, but were quite happy to eat, sleep, and rape.

    The USA [have] a foundation myth that Americans were left out of.

    But Africans were not. They accounted for more than 10% of congressional representation. Adams would have won easily in 1800 had only white men been counted. Same goes for his son in 1824.

    • Replies: @anarchyst
  135. Mulegino1 says:
    @Corvinus

    Germany invaded free peoples like the Polish and the Czechs and the French to sate their own bloodlust.

    Typical deflection.

    What do you mean by “free peoples”? The Poles lived under the dictatorial “Regime of the Colonels,” and the Czechs lived under their masonic ethnarch Benes whose government treated the minorities in Czechoslovakia as second or third class citizens.

    And “bloodlust”? Seriously? Wild hyperbole with nothing to back it up. If you want to talk about bloodlust, think about Ilya Ehrenburg, Morgenthau, Dexter White and the rest of your own sainted Bolsheviks. The crimes that Jewry and its shabbos goy auxiliaries committed against the Christian peoples of the Soviet Union (and later Germany) dwarfed anything realistically imputed to the Third Reich by orders of magnitude.

    Apart from the profitable guilt extortion racket, the propping up of the settler compound in the Levant, and the silencing of nationalist voices in Europe, the Holohoax serves the additional purpose of deflecting from the very real crimes committed by the tribe in all its collective hideousness.

    Lol, hanging every problem that was ultimately caused by greed and avarice—the failings of our humanity—rather than addressing the conniving and jackbooting by the Nazi Party, only demonstrates your sheer ignorance. You’re not even being serious here. Thankfully, only an extreme minority take your position here.

    You are correct, the things I enumerated are caused by greed and avarice. An avarice brought about by the Transatlantic hegemony of neoliberalism and the worship of money which characterizes our current dystopia- a dystopia in which Jewry thrives as rats do in a sewer.

    The “conniving and jackbooting by the Nazi Party” pales into insignificance with the atrocities inflicted by the victors/so called “liberators.”

    • Replies: @Corvinus
    , @karel
  136. SafeNow says:

    Why can’t I be 40 years younger so I can fight 40 years longer? In this struggle, some will be great. Choose to be great!

    Jared Taylor seems to think that the unraveling of America will be long-term, going forward. Certainly it was a generational process previously, as he acknowledges – – 1960s until now. He seems to be extrapolating from the past; seems to anticipate 40 years of struggle going forward. But you know the old saying about how someone goes bankrupt….slowly slowly slowly and then all of a sudden. Many people believe that this paradigm will apply to America’s societal revolution. “Time is very short” should get more discussion.

    • Agree: SteveRogers42
  137. @Exalted Cyclops

    Good point. In the end, Whites are ultimately responsible for what has occurred to them by vindicative and subversive Jews. It could not have happened to us in our own countries had we not first allowed it in some way. Far too many of our people were complicit. Many simply didn’t care. They were apathetic and preoccupied with the pleasures of this passing age.

    It does no good to blame all of our woes on Jews. Whites should not be like Blacks and even Jews themselves who never look in the collective mirror and take responsibility for what they have done or contributed.

    Yet with that said, none of this negates pointing out the leading role of Jews in the West’s decline. Think of it as someone who has been badly duped by a religious cult. Anyone who wants to help the cult member leave the cult must address BOTH the deceptive ways of the group as well as the foolish decision to join the cult in the first place. In other words, both the deceived and the deceivers are responsible, and they have each played a role in the fraud and deception of it all.

    White racialists MUST address the role that Jews have played in deceiving our people. But we must also take accountability for having allowed such a deceiving and parasitic people to enslave us as they have.

    • Agree: Rumpelstiltskin
    • Replies: @Corvinus
    , @CelestiaQuesta
  138. Agent76 says:

    Sep 28, 2021 The Russian and Ukrainian Spring 2021 War Scare By The Center for Strategic & International Studies

    The massing of troops and hardware by Russia along its border with Ukraine in April 2021 brought back memories of Russia’s incursion into Ukraine in 2014–15 and raised fears of another round of Russian aggression against its neighbor. Although the worst-case scenario did not materialize, Russia might have succeeded in sending specific signals to the Biden administration. In the case of Ukraine, though, the intended effect backfired. Russian threats and aggressive moves might influence the target audience in the West in the way Moscow may desire, but it is likely to have the opposite effect with regard to Ukraine. Another Ukrainian leader, Volodymyr Zelenskiy, now unambiguously wants his country to join NATO.

  139. Extreme Sarcasm/Satire Alert Warning.
    CW 2.0 can’t come any sooner. Until blacks are euthanized in whatever means necessary, and Jews are stripped of ill gotten gains, oven baked and made into lampshades and soap, and GlobalHomo’s are rounded up and fed into volcanoes, only then will the rest of humanity live in a safe and prosperous world.
    Until then, you can kiss your whites asses goodbye, because they’re coming for you sooner than you think.

    • Troll: Corvinus
  140. anarchyst says:
    @RockaBoatus

    I have been banned from commenting on American Renaissance for over a decade for bringing up the “jewish question”.
    Attempts to get reinstated have fallen on deaf ears…
    It’s their loss, not mine…

  141. Corvinus says:
    @Reg Cæsar

    “Prime example: John T Chisholm.”

    Non sequitur.

    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar
  142. @Exalted Cyclops

    Please excuse me, but may I ask, who is this forgotten God you speak of?
    I wish to know my creator before I die.
    Thanks in advance.

  143. anon[244] • Disclaimer says:
    @Paladin

    . In 1967, the author Susan Sontag wrote that “the white race is the cancer of human history”

    Just like Blacks have been called beasts ,Chinese have been killed “yellow peril ” and Indinas have been called savages ,
    Whats new ?
    Sontag’s was simply a self-admission.

    I could see a future here. America fighting along ethnic lines- Bakcks vs Latino, Latino vs Whites and White vs Blacks and Native Americnas watching from a distance waiting to claim the lost place while China and Africa join hands to push the whites back to Euroepan dark winter .

    India Pakistan and Arab monsters will join the American Eurooean and get hurt again for another 300 hundred years .

    • Replies: @SteveRogers42
  144. anarchyst says:
    @Reg Cæsar

    Once in a while the truth spills out, even on jewish-controlled media.
    Such examples exist to this day in the prison series “The Big House”.
    There are two locations where the “plantation system” still exists, One being Louisiana State Penitentiary at Angola, and the other at Mississippi State Penitentiary at Parchman Farm.
    In both programs, the reasons stated for keeping the “plantation system” operational in both states was the excessive, rampant criminality of the recently-freed slaves. It was more economical to keep the plantations open rather than building new facilities.
    To this day, both facilities are good examples of the “plantation system” being a useful way to keep inmates in line and occupied while providing useful labor to keep the prison systems operating efficiently.
    To this day, very little mechanized farm machinery is utilized as there is a large (black) manual labor force available and ready for work, not unlike in the days of pre-mechanized farming operations.
    Once in a while the TRUTH gets out…

    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar
  145. America is not dying. What hyperbole. This is just what the Deep State and its chaos funders and apparatchiks want us to believe. What is occurring is a number of high profile, very choreographed media events to demoralize and drive people out of some states to relocate elsewhere. All mass movements never come from below but from elites above.

    Imagine what the so-called phony religionist Islamists (organized crime network) terrorized and took over Iran in the late 1970’s, forced its modernized women to wear face masks forever, eliminated the puppet monarchy and implemented social-political oppression.

    Religion is no longer the main social control mechanism in modern societies; big medicine, big science and the deep state is. So, the recent planned epidemic has forced people to wear masks, brand themselves as slaves of the Deep State by forced vaccinations, reduced elections to a charade and now are forcing a two-class system on everyone.

    Both of the above are counter movements against popular democracy movements in Egypt (the Couch Party Movement), USA (Trump MAGA), Italy and Britain (Brexit). In Egypt in 2012, the people rose up to remove the puppet president Mo Morsi who won an election rigged by Hillary Clinton, Obama with a show of power by the US Navy. The organized crime takeover movement failed in Egypt.

    In the US, the counter movement against the Deep State-organized crime prevailed by surprise in 2016 to 2020 but was reversed again by rigged elections, a phony epidemic and staged riots.

  146. @RockaBoatus

    Everyone is conditioned to think that their current time frame is where all the sensible and rational people live, that everyone who went before, from 10,000 B.C. right up to last year, were morons. But pre-1960 blacks and whites couldn’t get married, and Jews couldn’t get into country clubs. From 1947:

    Zanuck decided to make a film version of Hobson’s novel [“Gentleman’s Agreement”] after being refused membership in the Los Angeles Country Club, because it was assumed (incorrectly) that he was Jewish. Before filming commenced, Samuel Goldwyn and other Jewish film executives approached Darryl Zanuck and asked him not to make the film, fearing it would “stir up trouble”. They also warned that Hays Code enforcer Joseph Breen might not allow the film to pass the censors, as he had been known to make disparaging remarks about Jews. – Wikipedia

    So what changed during our lifetimes? What made hundreds of previous generations agree that cultural diversity was certain doom, that XX meant female and XY meant male, that God’s Chosen People inevitably create chaos in their wake? Anyone born after the Department of Education was created in 1979 has been taught to violently reject our antecedent’s inherent moral certitude on these inviolable precepts. How’d this happen?

    I guess the takeaway is: Propaganda works.

  147. @RockaBoatus

    Perhaps he is afraid of losing the Jewish donors that support American Renaissance? Perhaps he feels that addressing the JQ too openly will make him look like the very neo-Nazi that Jews claim him to be?

    This makes no sense. If Jews think Taylor is a neo-Nazi, why do they donate to AmRen?

    • Replies: @RockaBoatus
  148. Corvinus says:
    @RockaBoatus

    . In the end, Whites are ultimately responsible for what has occurred to them by vindicative and subversive Jews.

    “It does no good to blame all of our woes on Jews.”

    But, in the end, you fall into that trap, and still do.

    “Think of it as someone who has been badly duped by a religious cult.”

    So whites perpetually and systematically have been hoodwinked by Jews anywhere and everywhere, despite their high IQ and time preferences? I mean, they have yet to pinpoint exactly who has been misleading them? And even when they do find out, they still do not believe it? Well, that is far fetched.

    “White racialists MUST address the role that Jews have played in deceiving our people.”

    Exactly, how?

    “But we must also take accountability for having allowed such a deceiving and parasitic people to enslave us as they have.”

    We? No, you. “We” have made our own choices here. There was no deception. There was no misleading. “We” are quite aware of the factors involved. It comes down to you and others having a difference of opinion.

    • Replies: @RockaBoatus
    , @Oracle
  149. @RockaBoatus

    For hundreds of generations poor whites trusted leaders from government and house’s of worship. They promised whites life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, if we could only put our faith in god, and trust the science, and trust government.
    What we now know is only a peak into the greatest deception and evil the world had ever known.
    Today our kids are taught to hate their white ancestry, culture and themselves. They’re taught many genders exist, and blacks were white owned slaves, and that 6 million Jews were sent to ovens by evil white Nazi’s, and that everything that has been built and created, was done so by white own slaves, and that to make things right, whites must now pay reparations for their crimes against humanity.

    How much more are you willing to pay?

  150. Not having illusions about Jewish mindset, all I can say is -finding US Jews “guilty” of suicidal white behavior is not realistic.

    There seems to be a segment of Jewish activists/journalists/public people who are consumed with hatred for white European races (they think of us as “guilty” for Hitler’s atrocities & all that), and who cannot think reasonably outside of that box. So, they don’t think of Latin America, Africa, most of Asia, ..- they are obsessed with white & white created world (Europe, North America & Anglosphere, less with white parts of South America). They are viscerally against historical European cultures (although they, as a rule, don’t know much, if anything, about other historical cultures, races, identities, …).

    Jewish activism is, in the area where demography, race, population transfers happen, virtually always on the non- European side. So it was in Rhodesia, South Africa, Algeria (Gilo Pontecorvo is Jewish- what would he said if someone asked him about Arabs kicking out Jews from Israel, instead about Arabs kicking out the French from Algeria?), in Russia with Chechen question, in mass demographic invasions in Europe, US & Canada & Ireland & Australia & ….

    From what I know, almost all Jews, anywhere, have nothing to do with that. But, the public face of specifically Jewish activism re. These questions are always inimical to the historical Europeans’ culture. Just read Eric Zemmour’s article: https://www.amren.com/features/2014/11/forty-years-that-unmade-france/

    Forty Years that Unmade France

    We’ve heard about names of some prominent Jews (or at least vocal Jews) who blabbered, during parts of their careers, against white Europeans or were strong public advocates of unlimited black & brown immigration: Barbara Lerner Spectre, Barbara Roche (I would add Streisand as well, just to get the number three, loaded with occult significance), Tim Wise, Susan Sontag, some Jewish all-immigration activists in Australia, Ireland, perhaps Sweden… and that’s it. You can add a significant amount of Jewish journalist hacks & a sinister figure of Soros as a puppeteer, and, there you are.

    And I forgot Hart-Cellar act (I’m tired of writing it was not a diabolical plan for white dispossession), as well as mixed-race Coudenhove-Kalergi, who seems to have achieved a mythic status in the imagination of conspiracy minded people.

    Having all this in mind, we can safely assume that immigration inundation, now, is a native, homegrown phase in the Western culture (as were Reformation or various revolutions), and not anything engineered by an alien elite. Simply put, most wealthy European peoples are not nationalist enough & their natural defense mechanisms have sunken abysmally- they’ve become cowards; ruling elites are not a part of the people, as they have been, more or less, in past 500 years (or less, never mind)- they are as alien as the Mongol dynasty was to the Chinese Han people during the 13th-14th C. How this alienation came to pass, in past 50-70 years, is quite another question.

    And what they want is quick bucks. Also, they are afraid. They are afraid of the potential turmoil, revolution, what to do with so many Africans, Muslims, Indians, Chinese,… who are an ineradicable alien body in their midst & where the only solution would be a dissolution of normal democracy & deportation of the “rest of the world”.

    It seems unimaginable?

    Well, the deportation of 12 million Germans seemed unimaginable in the 1930s.

    Do Jews “control” immigration in Germany? No.

    Do Jews “control” immigration in Italy? No.

    Are Jews, in the US, Musk, Bezos, Gates, Buffet, Slim, Koch, Walton, ..? Are ethnic Jews & half-Jews like Zuckerberg, Ellison, Brin, .. a part of some conspiracy to bring down white America, or white Western civilization?

    If you believe this, I got the Taj Mahal to sell.
    ….

    These are gluttonous & idiotic homegrown elites of these countries that lead suicidal immigration policy, along with idiotic local NGOs & stupider than ever local peoples. You can safely put blame on shoulders of economical-political-media elites of Germany, Britain, Italy, Spain, US…. which are by far white European, corrupt, anti-national, greedy & globally stupid.

    As well as on peoples of Britain, Germany, Italy…. who are, taken as a whole, incredibly stupid, degenerate, fat, lazy & without a sense of true national identity.

    And what about guys like, I call them, public & journalist Jews and anti-white Jewish activists?

    Nothing, just never trust Jewish activists & public “thinkers” on issues relating race, ethnicity, national identity & immigration – with a few exceptions. And do not imagine that they are responsible for behavior of North American & West European financial, political & other ruling elites.

    • Replies: @RockaBoatus
  151. Corvinus says:
    @Mulegino1

    “What do you mean by “free peoples”? The Poles lived under the dictatorial “Regime of the Colonels,” and the Czechs lived under their masonic ethnarch Benes whose government treated the minorities in Czechoslovakia as second or third class citizens.”

    That MAY be true, but they certainly were not free under the thumb of Nazi Germany. Do you think the Poles, Czechs, and French appreciated being murdered, with their women raped and their children’s skulls bashed in?

    “And “bloodlust”? Seriously?”

    Absolutely. Hitler and company will hell bent on seizing territory and implementing authoritarian rule.

    “The crimes that Jewry and its shabbos goy auxiliaries committed against the Christian peoples of the Soviet Union (and later Germany) dwarfed anything realistically imputed to the Third Reich by orders of magnitude.”

    Essentially, you are saying one thing is “more evil” than another thing. And you do not think the deat and destruction by the Third Reich was “anything realistically imputed”?

    “the Holohoax serves the additional purpose of deflecting from the very real crimes committed by the tribe in all its collective hideousness.”

    Well, the Holocaust did actually happen. Very well documented.

    “You are correct, the things I enumerated are caused by greed and avarice. An avarice brought about by the Transatlantic hegemony of neoliberalism and the worship of money which characterizes our current dystopia- a dystopia in which Jewry thrives as rats do in a sewer.”

    It wasn’t Jews, or whites, or the darkies. It was people.

    “The “conniving and jackbooting by the Nazi Party” pales into insignificance with the atrocities inflicted by the victors/so called “liberators.””

    That would be your opinion.

    • Replies: @anarchyst
  152. @Fart Blossom

    He isn’t new.

    He’s just full of shit.

    As you said, the poor Germans watched as organized jewry destroyed Russia and slaughtered millions right next door…..and the Germans knew they were next.

    I’d say we’re very close to what it was like during Weimar….same degeneracy….same jewish gloating and goading……now inflation as well.

    Nothing surprises me anymore.

    • Agree: Fart Blossom
  153. Getaclue says:
    @Realist

    Darwin is bs–inconvenient facts are just ignored….

    • LOL: Realist
  154. fausto says:
    @aandrews

    Dostoyessky’s description of Jews is the best. In Crime and Punishment. Though for the life of me , I can not recall the exact words. Anyone?

    • Replies: @mephisto
  155. geokat62: “We, the people, did no such thing. As KMac clearly demonstrated in Ch 7 of his magnum opus, it was Jewish Supremacist Organisations (JSOs) that worked overtime for close to a century to overturn the restrictionist immigration laws of the past in order to flood the country with mass immigration from the third world. ”

    There are a lot of problems with this, and here are just a few of them.

    First, the so-called restrictionist immigration laws you are referring to (e.g., the 1924 law) already allowed for UNLIMITED (i.e., non-quota) immigration from anywhere in the Western hemisphere. So they weren’t really restrictionist at all.

    Second, the quotas the 1924 law set up were by country, not race or religion, therefore the frequently repeated argument that it was a racial defense by whites is just a lie.

    Third, nobody forced the overwhelmingly white Congress to pass and the white President to sign the 1965 Immigration Act, nor has the white majority of the American voting public ever demanded its rescission. It is, in other words, more properly seen as just another instance of white Christian American virtue signaling, a racially self-destructive practice whites have engaged in ever since the country’s founding.

    Fourth, the 1965 Immigration Act was passed during the Cold War, a period in which the USA was taking pains not to appear racist because it was competing with the Soviet Union for influence in the Third World. In other words, whites had their own motivations for passing it.

    Fifth, continued white insouciance (ht: PCR!) in the face of massive non-white ILLEGAL immigration shows they don’t really care about it very much.

    Sixth, who let the Jews in, anyway? They only have a say because white people gave it to them.

    • Disagree: Robert Dolan
  156. GeneralRipper [AKA "CorvusCorax"] says:
    @Corvinus

    That is an anti-white statement. Whites are highly intelligent, with an unparalleled work ethic and a moral code above reproach. How dare you label my race in that fashion. Only controlled opposition like yourself would sully our storied reputation. Repent!

    How’s that nice white majority neighborhood treating you, big girl?

    Why do all multicult loving, anti-racist Leftoids live in majority white neighborhoods?

    That’s the 64,000 dollar question..lol

  157. @Corvinus

    Non sequitur.

    No, district attorney.

    He got 97.7% of the vote in 2020, after a dozen years in office. His county is only 40% nonwhite, so some of the remainder must have voted for him. These voters have to admit responsibility.

    The parade route in Waukesha should be renamed the Chisholm Trail.

  158. @anarchyst

    It was more economical to keep the plantations open rather than building new facilities…

    …let alone hiring white men. Actual labor is pricey.

  159. Chap.7 of “The Culture of Critique.”

  160. @Priss Factor

    The actress Sandy Dennis,(April 27– -March,2 1992) could make any role she played in seem cruddy. Her talent consisted in this.. I enjoyed her acting. It created a kind of weird and interesting feeling to most viewers.

  161. DrWatson says:
    @Thim

    Why don’t you dox yourself if you are so courageous yourself? Jared is publishing openly while we all have a pseudonym, conveniently. He says what he feels he can. It is not his fault that there is such a political climate that you are reduced to the status of a pariah if you dare criticize (((them))).

  162. GeneralRipper [AKA "CorvusCorax"] says:
    @Maddaugh

    Here’s a great vid of how the Brazilians deal with criminals.

    No, Stop! or Halt! or any of that nonsense, just a hail of lead through the glass and two dead lowlifes.

    That’s how we used to roll here in the US.

    Sorry about the shitty (c)rap background.

    When the coon still squirming on the floor gets hit again is when they should play the laugh trac..lol

    • LOL: Maddaugh
    • Replies: @bruce county
    , @Maddaugh
  163. geokat62 says:
    @Dr. Robert Morgan

    First, the so-called restrictionist immigration laws you are referring to (e.g., the 1924 law) already allowed for UNLIMITED (i.e., non-quota) immigration from anywhere in the Western hemisphere. So they weren’t really restrictionist at all.

    Not restrictionist, huh? Let’s see how Congress described the intent of the bill:

    In all of its parts, the most basic purpose of the 1924 Immigration Act was to preserve the ideal of American homogeneity.

    https://2001-2009.state.gov/r/pa/ho/time/id/87718.htm

    Second, the quotas the 1924 law set up were by country, not race or religion, therefore the frequently repeated argument that it was a racial defense by whites is just a lie.

    According to Wiki:

    The act gave 85% of the immigration quota to Northern and Western Europe and those who had an education or had a trade. The other 15% went disproportionately to Eastern and Southern Europe.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_Act_of_1924

    Sounds pretty white to me.

    Third, nobody forced the overwhelmingly white Congress to pass and the white President to sign the 1965 Immigration Act, nor has the white majority of the American voting public ever demanded its rescission.

    Forced? Isn’t that a slightly stronger term for “strongly influenced,” lol.

    As for the public not demanding rescission, weren’t they assured by their supposed representatives that the bill would not dramatically alter the demographics of the country? Trust the plan, goy! lol

    Fourth, the 1965 Immigration Act was passed during the Cold War… In other words, whites had their own motivations for passing it.

    LOL. If we didn’t pass this legislation, we would’ve lost the Cold War, goy!

    Fifth, continued white insouciance (ht: PCR!) in the face of massive non-white ILLEGAL immigration shows they don’t really care about it very much.

    Look, goy, we’re flooding your country with illegals and since you’re doing absolutely nothing to stop it, the public ipso facto favoured Hart-Celler, lol.

    Sixth, who let the Jews in, anyway? They only have a say because white people gave it to them.

    TBH, that’s the biggest question I have, too. Who thought it was a brilliant idea to invite a few million revolutionary Eastern European Jews in the late 19th century? That decision sealed America’s fate, I’m afraid.

    • Agree: Robert Dolan
  164. @Dr. Robert Morgan

    “Physician heal thyself. ” That is if you are not a Piled Higher and Dryer, rather being an MD. To quote one of those Jews who tend towards mysticism and prophecy: “Money doesn’t talk, it swears”. Not that Mr. Zimmerman has not earned plenty of gelt. But he didn’t push the guilt. Capisce?

    When money talks–or swears–there are plenty of people who go along to get along…and that includes Shabos Goys such as yourself.

  165. Realist says:
    @HT

    That 2 percent that controls the media, entertainment and academia is precisely why those whites are stupid and misled.

    WRONG the Whites are stupid for letting the two percent control everything. They still haven’t figured it out.

  166. DrWatson says:
    @Maddaugh

    Black Brazilians are almost three times as likely to be victims of homicide, according to 2019 government data. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2020/11/21/thousands-attack-brazil-supermarket-amid-violent-protests-black/

    Interesting differences be the USA and Brasil. Could the cause be the lack of guns in the US? Funny you insist on having them (and the 2nd amendment) as some kind of a symbol of your freedom and the oppression at the same time is getting more unbearable by the day.

    And it is a totalitarian dictatorship, not an open, direct one (like it was typical in Latin America). It is creeping up on you in the most unexpected ways. Like you are fined for putting up Xmas decoration too early in your garden.

    Perhaps if you got rid of all the guns, relations would be more normal in the US?

    • LOL: Mike Tre, Maddaugh
  167. There is a short story called “The Lottery” by Shirley Jackson(published in 1948) that was assigned in both high school and college. The story begins with what seems like just another community gathering in a small town. All the families are there. Old folks, parents, and children. And village leaders and the like. Everything seems normal. People are gathered for a lottery, and it hardly seems unusual. You’d think maybe it’s for a prize turkey or some such. The shocker comes at the when it’s revealed that lots were drawn for human sacrifice. The chosen must be stoned to death, and there’s no two ways about it. Even the family of the doomed must accept the outcome. Of course, the shock derives from its occurring in the modern world. Though rural and folksy, it’s still part of the 20th century. And yet, human sacrifice is practiced by people like ‘you and me’. Is it a remnant of hidden tradition within a religious minority, or did it arise as an act of desperation in times of bad harvest? A similar story, indeed even creepier(and lot more entertaining), is the British film THE WICKER MAN where an islandic community carries on with updated version of pagan practices, even human sacrifice. Supposedly, Stephen King(and others, literary or genre) took inspiration from Shirley Jackson, and it’s evident enough in King’s short story THE MIST(seen it, haven’t read it) where panic unleashes the darker aspects of humanity. The difference is King’s universe is one rife with spirits and/or sci-fi monsters, which rather undermines his (cheap)shots against the religious mindset. (If the world can be full of demons or frankenstein-science, why not imbued with God and Biblical truth? Perhaps it’s because King’s idea of holiness amounts to some mountain-sized Negro who wuvs a wittle white mouse or some grey-haired Negress full of folk wisdom. King attacks one kind of irrationality to push an even sillier one.) At any rate, if “The Lottery” and THE WICKER MAN are more unnerving, it’s precisely because they take place in the ‘real world’, without recourse to suspension of disbelief. They go to show that the ‘monster’ is really in us, though THE WICKER MAN is more ambiguous in a mix of horror and reverie at the pagan ways that finally reduce the priggish Christian inspector to a pitiful sack of tears babbling prayers to God to no effect.

    The authoress Shirley Jackson was likely a leftist. She was married to a Jewish literary critic who seemed to have been an adherent(and even a pioneer) of a branch of Critical Theory in the arts, though the intellectualism of the time was surely more serious and sober(and would seem even ‘conservative’ today) than the vulgarized and pop-culturized garbage that passes for ‘critical theory’ today. The story probably has been a favorite among Liberals as a swipe against the reactionary, conservative, and narrow-minded small town mentality that, instead of seeking rational solutions, clings to custom and rituals out of dark fear and superstition. At the time when the story was written, there was a much bigger divide between the cosmopolitan city and the ‘backward’ small town. Today, radio-TV-and-the-internet have profoundly altered the cultural landscape of rural areas. In the age of Fentanyl and White Death, it no longer makes sense to speak of small town ways and values in contrast to city slicker life. There was a famous Life magazine photo of a small town community encircling foxes egging on a smiling boy clubbing them to death. At the other end, there was Norman Rockwell with his rather bucolic and picaresque depiction of small town life.

    Fast forward to now, and “The Lottery” is more relevant than ever. Not only has there been a rise in the occult, voodoo, witchcraft, astrology, and ‘crystals’ among educated types(especially with the fading of religious authority and the negative association of science/enlightenment with ‘dead white males’), but colleges, the very bastions of reason and critical thinking, have turned into centers of dogma, ones that see the world in terms of not only heroes and villains but of saints and demons, gods and monsters. It seems Stephen-King-ism has taken over the ‘woke’ mind. Kingism replaced the bigotry of the Old Religion with delusions of the new cults of the Magic Negro and the like. Same can be said of Joyce Carol Oates, another fan of Shirley Jackson. The war that modernity and rationalism waged on traditional irrationalism didn’t lead to the triumph of facts & reason but of the new idolatry, mainly of Jew Worship, Negro Idolatry, and Homo Celebration.

    The ‘woke’ mentality is similar to the one in “The Lottery”. It is geared toward human sacrifice to placate and appease the new gods. In their worldview, Negroes are innately divine and sacred. To the wokemons, George Floyd wasn’t some lowlife punk who died of drug overdose under the knee of a police officer(the factual truth) but some Negro Angel who died for the sins of ‘systemic racism’. And for this reason, billions of dollars of damage against American cities has been justified as an offering to the black gods? Derek Chauvin must be human-sacrificed on the altar of Floyd Rapture.

    [MORE]

    The ‘woke’ passions during the Kyle Rittenhouse trial also reeked of human-sacrifice mentality. To any sane person, it was obvious Rittenhouse wasn’t out to kill people but used his gun for self-defense. But, to the ‘woke’ types, justice isn’t based on facts. It’s based on symbolism and cult mentality, in the blind faith that the US is crawling with evil nazi goblins who must be destroyed by any means necessary by the heroic Antifa and BLM mobs with the blessing of the Power and the Deep State. Even as more ‘woke’ types are into witchcraft, they are also increasingly into the witch-hunt mentality.
    When truth is sacrificed, humanity is sacrificed. All those who denied the murderousness of Stalinism gave moral cover to Stalin to kill many more. Those who give moral cover to ‘woke’ lunacy give moral and legal cover for mobs to do more damage, even leading to the deaths of innocents. The end result is hardly different from human sacrifice. In any endeavor, there are winners and losers; in favoring one, we disfavor the other. Still, one can favor one without dehumanizing the other. But, when only one perspective is allowed(and even sacralize), result is total blindness to other perspectives, even to the point of dehumanization. The current mania of Negrodolatry turns a blind eye to all the victims of black thuggery, be they white, brown, yellow, and even black. BLM mendacity has actually led to More Dead Blacks, but it’s ignored because it undermines the faith in the Noble Negro who wuvs a wittle white mouse but is oppressed by ‘systemic racism’.

    Worse, in the age of Covid Nuttery, forget about being saved by one’s reliance on principled science. While there are plenty of brilliant Jews in many elite fields, who can deny that most Jews are motivated by tribal(supremacist) interest than the objective truth and will cook the books in favor of power over principles? This is evident in the Jewish change of opinion on free speech. In the past, the great majority of Jews were for Free Speech, and one might have assumed Jews, whatever their tribal biases, placed universal principles higher on their list of priorities. In retrospect, it seems Jews favored Free Speech in the past because they needed its protection to out-compete other groups. Now that they have the supreme power, they not only use private companies to restrict free flow of ideas and information but are amassing an army of lawyers, judges, academics, and pundits to do away with the First Amendment.
    After all, the Bill of Rights are only as good as what the courts say. Incredibly, the judges decided the US Constitution is about enforcing ‘gay marriage’ in all fifty states. Why would the Jewish shift on Free Speech be an exception than the rule? It seems part of a larger pattern where Jewish Power, motivated mainly by tribal dominance, will twist and turn anything to maximize its dominance. Of course, such behavior is found in any power, be it Turkish, Chinese, Iranian, Russian, and etc. Still, the US is the lone superpower, and what happens in the US has far greater consequences all over the world. Also, while Anglos have shown at times to be capable of choosing higher principle over(or at the expense of) tribal interest, this is rarely the case with Jewish Power these days. Anyone who hasn’t noticed a coordination(if not outright conspiracy) among the Jewish-dominated institutions and industries of law firms, mass media, finance, big tech, big pharma, and deep state is just fooling himself. One really has to be a moron at this point to earnestly and sincerely put his/her trust in Anthony Fauci as Mr. Science. He got to where he is as the useful shill of far more powerful forces, the ones that also foisted Bill Nye on young ones as the ‘scientific’ authority on sexuality and ‘gender’.

    At any rate, the ‘science’ of Covid-mania has turned into a kind of human sacrifice. Not because the ‘vaccines’ are particularly deadly(they aren’t though far more so that earlier vaccines, the real kind) but because so much sanity has been sacrificed in the blind service to this Narrative pushed by Jewish Supremacist Power. Many people died or lost their minds because utterly irrational lockdowns prevented necessary medical treatments or forbade social interaction so integral to mental health. But all such sacrifices were deemed necessary to combat the greatest disease of all time, whether it was blamed on Trump, China, or bats(though when BLM riots were deemed useful against Trump, the lockdowns were suddenly de facto suspended for the ‘mostly peaceful protesters’). Just like one’s eyes can spot mud on others’ faces but not his/her own, those startled by what happens in “The Lottery” are likely to remain blind to how their own world eerily bears some similarities.
    The key difference is the sacrifices are made to a different set of gods and beliefs, often deemed as ‘science’, ‘reason’, ‘justice’, or ‘progress’ but operating at the emotive level much like the gods of old.

    While science and rationalism are great in and of themselves, they’re often tools of the Power. It’s just the way the world is. It’s like a democracy should ideally be Rule by the People, but it rarely works out that way. Ideally, the free press should dig into facts objectively and speak truth to power, but more often than not, the media are controlled by the powerful that use it to further their own power at the expense of others. Just ask the Palestinians. Media lies(or perhaps they should be called voodoo superstitions) about black criminality and thuggery(and racial truths in general) have led to something akin to human sacrifice. Recently, some crazed Negro willfully plowed into white folks celebrating the holiday season in Wisconsin with an SUV, but the media pretended it was all just an accident and had nothing to do with race. Thus, black lunacy is swept under the rug and more blacks feel emboldened to act crazy, leading to more deaths.
    Of course, the motivations of Jewish media folks and goy media folks differ. For Jewish Power, Negrolatry is key to guilt-baiting white goyim, whose submission is key to Jewish Supremacism, and so, the Big Lie is employed cynically as a power-strategy. Among goy media types, there are other reasons. Among blacks in media, it’s just self-aggrandizement as blacks seem to have no limits to their self-adulation. Among whites, there are those who know what’s really happening but go along to further their careers, and there are those white cucks who are really stupid enough to have swallowed whole hog the tenets of political correctness.

    One kind of modern human sacrifice, endorsed and practiced by both sides of the political aisle, is the product of mindless worship of Jewish Power. Perhaps, it was best encapsulated by Madeleine Albright’s statement that it was ‘worth it’ to sacrifice half a million Arab children for the New World Order. Okay, Hussein was a bad guy who turned Iraq into a brutal place, but one could have made the same case for Israel, a nation that came into existence via terrorism & ethnic cleansing and maintained its grip by subverting neighboring nations, especially Lebanon. Since Albright spoke those chilling words in the 1990s, Zionist power has managed to spread far more terror throughout Middle East and North Africa. Entire nations have been wrecked by direct invasion, crippling sanctions, ceaseless bombing, or use of terrorist proxies rebranded as ‘moderate rebels’. US instigated the War on Terror after 9/11, only to end up arming those very terrorists to tear Libya and Syria apart even though Gaddafi gave up what little WMD he had and even though Syria is a modern Arab nation, far more westernized than others, such as Saudi Arabia, the favorite ally of the US that preaches modernity but seeks to undermine as much modern development in Arab/Muslim nations as possible at the behest of Israel that seeks monopoly of modernity in the region.

    Consider all the dead or crushed Palestinians, Arabs, and Muslims human-sacrificed at the altar of Jew Worship. Most Americans don’t care because of their blind worship of Jews and Israel. Even when Israel crushes the people in Gaza, there is nonstop bloviation among politicians(even by relatively unconventional Rand Paul) about the need for more support for Israel, more funds for the Iron Dome. It’s like George Foreman beating up a little kid and everyone howling about how Big George needs more protective padding from the little ‘bully’. In honor of, service to, and worship of Jews as the New Gods, the US foreign policy has effectively turned into rituals of human sacrifice. Anything to appease Jews-as-gods no matter the human cost. Even when Jews did most to destroy Donald Trump’s presidency, all you get from the Orange Man is “I need to be back in office so that AIPAC will totally control Congress, like it literally used to and deserve to.” One thing Trump and Pelosi agree on and will hug each other over is in their total deference to Jewish Power and not an ounce of sympathy for the Palestinians who continue to lose whatever remaining territory they have in the West Bank.

    The Sackler Family did so much harm to white working class Christians. Imagine if some Baptist family targeted the demographic that includes lots of Jews and killed scores of them with false advertising and corruption of the medical community. Jews would do everything to underline the ethnic character of the injustice, but even white communities worst impacted by Sackler evil dare not speak up and, instead, are into the dimwit support-the-troop mentality(at a time when the US military is nothing but a globo-homo neo-imperialist instrument of Jewish Supremacism that not only wages war on the Arab/Muslim world but plays with fire with Russia and China; the military does nothing to secure US borders to prevent White Nakba but is instead destabilizing the Middle East and North Africa, thus pushing even more non-white ‘refugees’ into the West, all to the delight of the likes of Blinken, Merrick Garland, and of course Jennifer Rubin).
    Support-the-Troops is a human sacrificial mentality. It suckers American families into believing their sons should surrender their lives for imperial ventures in the name of ‘liberal democracy’ or some such when the military’s primary purpose should be national defense. Also, the sons are invading and occupying other countries not for ‘liberal democracy’ but for imperial hegemony, now controlled by Jewish Power for Zionist-centrist reasons.
    Worse, it leads to the human sacrifice of foreigners who end up dying in far greater numbers than US troops armed to the teeth, and for what? Why are US troops in Syria?

    The idea that US troops should sacrifice their lives abroad fighting one bunch of foreigners in defense of another bunch really took hold with the narrative arising from World War II. How many times have we heard that US didn’t enter the war fast enough to take out Germany TO SAVE JEWS? While we can understand Jewish concerns for fellow Jews in other parts of the world, the moral logic is appalling because it argues goyim should sacrifice their own lives for the sake of Jews. After all, US entry into the war meant bushels of American deaths. Why should white Americans sacrifice their own sons to save Jewish sons? The argument would at least be somewhat honorable if Jews had mutual feelings, i.e. the willingness to sacrifice Jewish sons to save goy sons. So, how many Jews were willing to go to Cambodia and fight the Khmer Rouge to save Cambodian lives? (During the Vietnam, it seems Jewish families were mostly concerned about seeking deferments for their sons, not signing up to save South Vietnam and/or Cambodia from communism. Also, ending the draft meant future soldiers would mostly come from middle and lower class backgrounds.) How many Jews were just revved up to join the military and be shipped off to Rwanda to end the slaughter there? Or, in a twist of irony, how many Jews would be willing to push for war against Israel and join the US military to invade West Bank to save Palestinians from further ethnic cleansing pushed by Jewish Israelis? How many American Jews were willing to send their own sons to defend Ukrainians from being starved to death by Josef Stalin and Lazar Kaganovich? If anything, plenty of Jews back then in the US and Europe were supportive of the Bolshevik killing machine. In other words, Jews demand goy human sacrifice to save Jews but would never ponder sacrificing Jewish lives for filthy goyim. Heads we win, Tails you lose. (Take SAVING PRIVATE RYAN by Steven Spielberg. Though Ryan isn’t Jewish, he’s meant to serve as an ersatz Jew. Because he lost his brothers, he’s a special case and OTHERS must put their lives on the line to save the last remaining Ryan. As sentiments go, it’s understandable. Now, through private Ryan, Spielberg is emotionally suggesting that goyim should have sacrificed more of their own kind to save Jews who, like Ryan, got hit especially hard by Nazi tyranny. The moral logic would be halfway plausible but for the fact that Jews did most to exasperate Europeans in general and provoke German fury and, furthermore, have used their power since World War II to destroy so many innocent lives all in the service of Jewish Supremacism.)

    When we see all that’s happening around the world and in the streets of America where monuments of George Floyd are erected even as crazed Negroes go on ever bloodier rampages, it seems the human sacrifice in “The Lottery” is total amateur hour, small potatoes. After all, the community kills only one person per annum. In contrast, how many innocents have been sacrificed in the Wars for Israel, Sacklers’ poisoning of White America, Covidian perversion of science, and the Summer of George Floyd of 2020? But maybe the ‘woke’ can gaze into crystals for the truth, and maybe the ‘right’ can restore meaning by shouting, for the umpteenth time, “Uh duh, support the troops!”

    • Thanks: anarchyst, bruce county
  168. SafeNow says:

    Jared is looking very megacephalic in that photo; I can understand how he’s got room for Japanese and French in that large head. There should be some room left over for the Jewish question. I can’t understand why he would not address the Jewish manner of thought – – no need to mention the word Jewish or name any Jewish names. This would be somewhat evasive, but realistic, because that manner of thinking has been contagious; it now afflicts many leaders and pundits who are of a different religion. The guy who starts World War III might not be himself Jewish, but he has embraced that manner of thinking and pattern of speech.

  169. anarchyst says:
    @Corvinus

    In many eastern European countries, Germans were seen as “liberators” freeing the local gentile population from the clutches of the jewish banksters, commissars, and other government officials.
    Quit often, gentiles would point out the jewish banksters and commissars to the Germans so that they could be properly dealt with.

    • Thanks: Fart Blossom
    • Replies: @Corvinus
  170. mephisto says:
    @fausto

    “The man’s face bore that timeless look of distaste and dejection which has etched its acid mark on the face of every last member of the Jewish race.”
    You’re welcome. What a great description.
    Crime and Punishment by Dostoesky.

  171. bruce county says:
    @GeneralRipper

    That one is going up on my FB page .. I love it.

  172. @AbrahamSteinblattbaumstein

    White people haven’t committed any “crimes” against anyone.

    Really?

    I guess we’re pure as the driven snow, then? And universally decent, noble and sagacious, too.

    We (‘White Americans’) haven’t been responsible for, or at least accomplices in, death and destruction in … how many countries? Let’s say we start with the Spanish American War and the horrors visited on the Philippines (including vaccination crimes, btw). Dozens, easily.

    Is that ALL Jews’ fault? Wittle ol’ us are just innocents subject to the whims of fate and bad non-whites?

    TODAY, foolish whites fall over themselves to get the chance to say ‘thank you for your service’ to other whites for participating in criminal wars of aggression. It’s easy enough to ridicule libtards, but rightards have done plenty to drag America down themselves — widespread, mindless support of wars and evil corporations perhaps topping the list.

    It’s not one extreme or the other — ‘we’ have committed no crimes OR we’re the cancer of human history. We need to take a very hard look at ourselves.

    If we can’t admit our errors, we can’t fix them, and we’ll keep going down the toilet.

    • Replies: @Robert Dolan
  173. @geokat62

    Sixth, who let the Jews in, anyway? They only have a say because white people gave it to them.

    TBH, that’s the biggest question I have, too. Who thought it was a brilliant idea to invite a few million revolutionary Eastern European Jews in the late 19th century? That decision sealed America’s fate, I’m afraid.

    Hey geo, show the “Doc” this.

    All this lent a specific significance to the earlier Congressional pronouncement (1924), denying the right of “any foreign group” to “dictate the character of our legislation”. Among the president’s “advisers” many were of foreign birth or in effect became “foreign” by their devotion to Zionism or their attitude towards the world-revolution and world-government. In this sense a “foreign group”, embodying the mass-immigration of the preceding hundred years, formed itself around the American president and “steered” the course of events. The twelve years which followed showed that any “advice” acted on by the president must have been to the benefit of the destructive principle in its three interrelated forms: Communism, Zionism, world-government.

    -Douglas Reed, “the Controversy of Zion,” p (written ~1955 but unable to be published until 1978) https://archive.org/stream/TheControversyOfZion/TheControversyOfZion_djvu.txt

    The “doc” and others ought to look things up for themselves before spouting off and showing their ignorance and they shouldn’t need to be told that. Anyway, you done good, and the “doc” should consider a self administered enema, I think.

    • LOL: geokat62
  174. @Priss Factor

    Not a very good film but gets the idea across.

  175. @Rex Little

    The greater number of Jews believe that Mr. Taylor is a closeted neo-Nazi who happens to be politely spoken and possesses nice manners. They think he is disingenuous; that his nice outward appearance only serves to conceal a Hitler-lover underneath. This sort of notion is conveyed constantly by the ADL and other pro-Jewish groups about the man.

    However, there are some other Jews – a minority among the Tiny Hats, mind you – who agree with Taylor’s criticism of Blacks and third-world immigration into the U.S. Many of them financially support American Renaissance and they also attend the annual conferences too. In fact, several years back there was big controversy when David Duke, during a question-and-answer period, began to address the JQ openly which upset some of the Jews in attendance.

    Taylor, it seems to me, does all in his power to avoid the ADL’s stereotype that he’s just a ‘polite Nazi.’ This may explain (although I admit I have no way of being certain of this) why he considers Jews White and why he avoids addressing the JQ in any direct or forceful way. He may view of the optics of addressing the JQ as feeding into what his critics say about him which is why he avoids the topic (except briefly on very rare occasions).

  176. ”CorvusCorax”

    i am not sure what this means or who. but it appears you have ni clue o the social dynamics as it pertains to native americans in either hemisphere.

  177. karel says:
    @HammerJack

    Sort of reminds me of the people whose ‘bacon’ we saved in WW2. Gratitude? Ha! They’ve been on a full-court press to destroy us ever since.

    What kind of ”people” are you talking about. Be more specific next time.

  178. ”THE WICKER MAN is more ambiguous in a mix of horror and reverie at the pagan ways that finally reduce the priggish Christian inspector to a pitiful sack of tears babbling prayers to God to no effect.’

    the power of the wickerman – the original film is that the inspector is sacrificed because he is pure. he doesn’t cave into his instincts the double and triple arguments and suggestions in that film about principles and living up to them may have a cost

    and for the villagers, the sacrifice was to the honor of a man who was afforded escape multiple ties but resisted

    and you completely missed the the value or the import of the final scene.

    ——————————

    i would prefer to be the man who on something as core as one’s moral conduct rejects escape or the scapegoating of others.

  179. karel says:
    @White Elephant

    Communists, being red, greatly contribute to the diversity of the Scotch, whatever Scottishnesss may mean these days. Be humble and do not complain!

  180. @Corvinus

    There is no “trap” fallen into when it’s admitted that our people have been partly complicit in having been deceived by Jewish cultural subversion. A good many of our elected officials went along with it quite knowingly, and so did many millions of average Whites in both Europe and America. Granted, many gullible Whites were deceived by all of it, but a great many others gladly followed the long-nosed pipers of the Tribe.

    Please understand that I am not blaming all White people without exception. Some Whites had the good sense to perceive the Wizard behind the curtain. But most of our people didn’t. We must face this fact. We must also face the fact that a good many Whites would vigorously oppose any and all blaming of Jews in these matters. They are so lost in the sauce that it seems hopeless.

    It is right to call out Jews who have worked for our racial and cultural demise because the evidence for it is readily available and overwhelming. Many people will not look to find out. But those who are lovers of Truth will inevitably discover it. I will not do your homework for you, but a good place to begin is the ‘American Pravda’ series on this site. The truly amazing thing is that Jews openly admit everything I have claimed about them. They can’t help themselves. Their hubris (‘chutzpa’) knows no bounds.

    • Replies: @Robert Dolan
    , @Corvinus
  181. geokat62: “Who thought it was a brilliant idea to invite a few million revolutionary Eastern European Jews in the late 19th century? That decision sealed America’s fate, I’m afraid. ”

    Who? Why it was the Jews, of course! LOL.

    Since you evidently believe whites aren’t responsible for anything they do, at least you’re being logically consistent here.

    • Replies: @geokat62
    , @Rumpelstiltskin
  182. karel says:
    @Mulegino1

    Czechs lived under their masonic ethnarch Benes whose government treated the minorities in Czechoslovakia as second or third-class citizens.

    A primitive lie. Can you quote a single law specifying what ”second or third class” citizenship was supposed to be? Is it not odd that the third-class Germans fielded in 1935 the largest political party (Die Sudetendeutsche Partei, SdP) prior to WW2?

    • Replies: @Fart Blossom
    , @Mulegino1
  183. von Frey says:

    Another solution-free analysis of the problem, little different than any other article he has ever written.

    • Replies: @Fart Blossom
  184. @geokat62

    The most painful (and infuriating) aspect of The Immigration Act of 1965 was that the small hats brazenly LIED and told our people that the bill would not change the demographics…..when changing the demographics was the GOAL.

    Macdonald lays it all out in Chap.7 of The CofC.

    KMAC covers the many decades of jews demanding open borders for America….he names the names….the jewish lobby organizations…..he quotes directly from The Congressional Record.

    Of course, the true brilliance of Macdonald’s work is that for the most part he uses jewish sources, quoting right from the horse’s mouth…..so it’s basically impossible to refute his work.

    Also, note that Macdonald was fairly neutral regarding jewish influence for his first two books, and he says that his research for Chapter 7 on jewish influence on immigration is what made him realize that the jews were actively subverting America.

    Ironically, to this day the small hat media still claims that, “The Great Replacement is a conspiracy theory.”

    And out of the other side of their mouths they say, “But it’s a good thing that whites are being replaced.”

    The vaccine is safe and effective.

    Jan 6th was an insurrection.

    Russian collusion got Trump elected.

    The check is in the mail.

    I won’t come in your mouth.

    • Replies: @geokat62
  185. @Rumpelstiltskin

    I suggest that you read “The Israel Lobby” by Mearsheimer and Walt.

    • Replies: @Rumpelstiltskin
  186. Corvinus says:
    @anarchyst

    “In many eastern European countries, Germans were seen as “liberators” freeing the local gentile population from the clutches of the jewish banksters, commissars, and other government officials.”

    Not quite. In the aftermath of the invasion, a collective of underground resistance organizations formed the Polish Underground State. Many of the military exiles who managed to escape Poland subsequently joined the Polish Armed Forces in the West, an armed force loyal to the Polish government-in-exile.

  187. Antiochus says:
    @Anon

    Freedom follows form means that chaos (NOT freedom) is what exists when form (values, order, restraint, direction, law, etc.) are removed. Remove form and you get South Chicago, Oakland, Portland, Seattle, Somalia… (hell, the whole dysfunctional US). Freedom can only exist where there is form. Plato wrote The Republic after he witnessed the removal of form in democratic Athens resulting in the mob execution of Socrates. Society can only function if there is homogeneous societal agreement as to form. Minimally there either has to be some internal system of mutually agreed upon restraint or else there has to be an external form that will impose restraint by force. Functioning society is like a kite. It has to be constrained by a string to fly. Give it “freedom” by cutting the form and the kite falls to the ground.

    In the West the internal (and at times external) system of form was originally Christianity. We can argue all we want about how imperfect that system was (implemented both internally and/or externally) and most of those arguments would be true on some level. However, as Nietzsche understood perhaps more painfully than anyone before or since, you simply cannot kill the Christian God and expect everything in Europe to continue to function as before. When form is removed, as Plato observed, freedom does not expand, it contracts and eventually it disappears altogether. When it disappears chaos replaces freedom until eventually external constraints move back into place to re-impose form in the effort to restore equilibrium.

    Plato understood that nobody actually likes form. We naturally crave unlimited freedom, but it is delusional to believe that we can have freedom without form. Even the most law abiding, tax paying, civically minded, church going, family man, curses when he sees blue lights flashing in his rear view mirror. He diplomatically tries to be cheerful to the cop (especially if the wife and kids are in the car) but under his breath he is cursing the SOB. Yet he has some system of internal constraints. He signs the damn ticket with a scrawl and begins looking at his calendar to see if he can conveniently shuffle his schedule to fight it in court. He may go home and pour himself a drink and brood for a while on what it would be like to fire every stinking cop in the city. (Hell, they can’t even fix the damn potholes after raising taxes, why are they harassing me for going 10 miles over the speed limit on a 4 lane road that can easily handle traffic 3 times the posted limit?) But in the end you know what he does. On some deep intuitive level he knows that the pudgy little pig with his radar would actually risk his life for him if he had to call 911 when some drugged out, homeless street bum broke into his house. He pulls out his checkbook and writes the damn check.

    That internally restrained man could actually be black or white. But it’s far more likely than not, that if he was black all of those internal thoughts and restraints might take a different path. Everything else being exactly equal, if George Floyd had been white, and Derek Chauvin black, the overwhelming majority of whites would be cheering that the low life scum had finally gotten what he deserved. With blacks the exact opposite happens almost like clockwork… and that is a HUGE difference that is pointing to total system breakdown. We celebrate form (even if we don’t enjoy it) they celebrate freedom without form (and apparently enjoy it). This situation not only doesn’t help blacks, it is totally unsustainable. At some point, without form, all systems collapse.

    After ten thousand years of history, much of it primitive, chaotic and bloody, the Chinese have figured this all out. Do they enjoy being tracked everywhere they go? No, not any more than any of us like seeing blue flashing lights in the rear view mirror. But the average Chinese has a better grasp of reality than the average American and now they also have more freedom than they have ever had before… and I submit more than the average American who can’t even send his kids to school with worrying about them having their brains blown out by some dysfunctional maniac who should have been turned into fertilizer years ago, but instead lives in the homeless encampment next to the school and collects welfare and EBT.

    The average Chinese person (male or female) clearly understands the dialectic of form and freedom, yin and yang. Hell, they even know all about male and female! (There is 1.4 billion of them and they all came into the world in the usual way.) Plus, the Chinese government has added a little sugar to make the forms go down easier. The government does not use the forms only to catch criminals, but also as a reward system to the law abiding. In an effort to make the form less of an irritant, they exempt the retrained from having to deal with the unrestrained on trains (theaters, stadiums, public venues) because the low social credit score of the unrestrained prohibits them from even getting access to the same venues as the restrained. Plus, because the law abiding restrains himself internally (and doesn’t do things like clear his post nasal drip on the sidewalk) he now has a higher social credit score and gets an additional 20% discount on his train fare.

    All of this sounds repugnant to the average American who thinks he has outgrown the form of Christianity himself but thinks all this civilized behavior should just happen like magic… he takes a trip to Asia and spends a little time in Shanghai, Beijing, or Singapore and then returns to Anycity Dysfunctional USA. Sure he has conceal carry here where he can’t even own a gun in China… but then again you don’t need a gun in China because the forms (cops) actually do their jobs. The dysfunctional are restrained (or disappeared), the functional rewarded, the streets are clean, and there is virtually no crime.

    As a white guy who speaks only a little subpar Mandarin, I have zero fear traveling anywhere in China at 3 AM in the morning. As an old white guy with gray hair, young Chinese teenagers routinely offer me their seat on a crowded bus or train. But in the land of the free, in one of the safest zip codes in my city, I cannot even walk around my block after dusk, much less at 3 AM. And when I go into my local grocery store of 25 years, even the white kids are rude and disrespectful and I shudder to think what is hidden behind the black scowls and frowns. If I was ever stupid enough to get on a local bus or train, nobody reading this has to think twice regarding any preferential treatments for old white guys if there are no seats.

    Freedom follows form. China gets it, the US does not. There is not even a contest and the Chinese know it. All they have to do is wait out the clock.

  188. GeneralRipper [AKA "Nemo me impune lacessit"] says:
    @karel

    You dirty little Commie monkeys can do some damn fine work when properly motivated.

    I don’t care what anyone says.

    • Replies: @Mulegino1
    , @karel
  189. von Frey says:
    @HammerJack

    Sort of reminds me of the people whose ‘bacon’ we saved in WW2. Gratitude? Ha! They’ve been on a full-court press to destroy us ever since.

    Sort of reminds me of the (((people))) whose ‘bacon’ we saved in WW2. Gratitude? Ha! They’ve been on a full-court press to destroy us ever since.

    There. Fixed it for ya.

  190. geokat62 says:
    @Dr. Robert Morgan

    Since you evidently believe whites aren’t responsible for anything they do

    The old absolutist ploy pulled out whenever you destroy their feeble attempts at defending the indefensible, lol.

    Why not debate the counterpoints I raised to each of the six points you put forward to suggest that Jewish Supremacist Organisations were not the driving force behind the passage of Hart-Celler?

    Instead, you choose to jump on the fact that I pointed out the goys made a colossal mistake in their immigration policies, by making the feeble argument that whites are responsible for nothing.

    I’ll tell you why. Because you know it’s impossible to defend the indefensible, period.

    • Agree: Robert Dolan
  191. @RockaBoatus

    I agree with most of what you said except that “millions” of our people surely did NOT know what was going on. For sure our people did NOT know the jews were opening the borders to do an ethnic cleansing of whites.

    Organized jewry said, “Goy! We want what is best for you! Because we care abut you! We would never change the demographics in your country! We would never make you a hated minority in the nation your forefathers built! Trust us!”

    • Replies: @RockaBoatus
  192. Corvinus says:
    @RockaBoatus

    “There is no “trap” fallen into when it’s admitted that our people have been partly complicit in having been deceived by Jewish cultural subversion.”

    Assuming that there has been this Jewish cultural subversion.

    “A good many of our elected officials went along with it quite knowingly, and so did many millions of average Whites in both Europe and America.”

    More like millions of white people, who are other than average, who do not buy into this conspiracy theory. Rather, it’s not Jewish television, or Jewish racial integration, or Jewish immigration. It’s simply television, racial integration, and immigration policies.

    “Granted, many gullible Whites were deceived by all of it…”

    But that is the big lie here. That would mean white people lack the intelligence, lack the foresight, lack the ability to consciousness make choices on their own behalf. There is no “Wizard behind the curtain”–that is a figment of your imagination. And I get it. You have to convince yourself that somehow white people have been perpetually misled by Jews, and that their good nature has prevented from seeing how Jews tricked them, But there was no trick.

    “They are so lost in the sauce that it seems hopeless.”

    Again, that is your projection of your thoughts on this subject. You have to believe we are lost in order to carry on with your narrative. The fact of the matter is that millions of whites are of sound mind and made decisions that, in a nutshell, you disagree with.

    “It is right to call out Jews who have worked for our racial and cultural demise….”

    You are entitled to feel that way, but most whites do not.

    “because the evidence for it is readily available and overwhelming”.

    More like you are relying on confirmation bias as your comfort food.

    “Many people will not look to find out. But those who are lovers of Truth will inevitably discover it.”

    No, we have found truth. You just cannot bring yourself to it.

    “Their hubris (‘chutzpa’) knows no bounds.”

    You really need to look carefully at yourself in the mirror.

  193. geokat62 says:

    Tweet by Blair Cottrell:

    Why invade a country when you can just buy its institutions, turn its women against its men, make transvestites of its children, sell the wealth generated by its labour to foreign investors, then introduce a foreign army as ‘refugees’ and ‘diversity’ to finish it off?

  194. Corvinus says:
    @RockaBoatus

    “The British and the Americans certainly stood by and did nothing when Stalin invaded Poland and carved a bit of his own empire on Polish soil.”

    The British and French had been hoodwinked by Hitler. And you are conveniently forgetting a key detail here–the Germans took a fair share of Poland. The U.S. was trying to stay out of the impending war.

    “The Brits were simply looking for a reason to go to war with Germany”

    You’re not even being remotely honest here. How do you account for Germany invading several countries and murdering thousands of people?

    “the West is now ruled by Globo-Homo elites comprised disproportionately of Jews who are determined to morally and culturally subvert every White-Christian nation.”

    Nazis invaded and plundered White-Christian nations. I know it pains you to admit that fact, but your soul would be better off for it.

    • Replies: @Fart Blossom
  195. @karel

    The content at the link below may interest you. BTW, can you give us a primer on how the state of Czechoslovakia came to be and how the minorities there were treated?

    https://www.realhistorychan.com/crying-woman-of-sudetenland.html

    • Replies: @karel
  196. @von Frey

    Another solution-free analysis of the problem, little different than any other article he has ever written.

    Sorta like comment 188. Anyway any links to any articles you’ve written?

    • Replies: @von Frey
  197. Uncle Sam says:

    In order to be saved, what America needs is a right wing military coup. I am sure there are many patriotic Americans in the military who could organize such a coup and effectively carry it out. People like general Milley and others like him could easily be pushed aside.

    Martial law would be established. The first priority would be to shut down the mainstream media. That would greatly hamper efforts by the counter coupists to cause problems. Similarly, social media would have to be controlled. All information released to the public would have to be approved by a military commission. NO demonstrations, especially street protests would be allowed. Curfews would be imposed. Anyone violating those curfews would be thrown in jail with no release until order is restored. Otherwise, life would go on as normal. You can go buy food or gas or clothing. Or take trips for that matter.

    People who engage in violent activity would be dealt with very harshly. If you loot or burn you will be shot dead on the spot with live ammunition. No more rubber bullets, tear gas, pepper spray or high pressure water. When looters or burners are shot dead with live ammunition, said looting and burning will quickly come to an end, especially if it is broadcast or shown on television. Similarly anyone who throws rocks or uses any type of weapon against police or military would be shot dead on the spot.

    A military commission would be set up to have full, firm and frank discussions about the racial problem in America. These discussions could go on for months and be televised. No opinions or subjects would be censured. Whites would be allowed to say what they truly and honestly think about Blacks. Conversely, Blacks would be given the freedom to say what they think about Whites.

    The long term goal of these discussions would ultimately be separation or segregation. The Martin Luther King experiment has failed. That is as clear as the sky on a cloudless day.

    In the long term, White America will have to choose between hurting black people’s feelings or perhaps something far worse. That day is inevitable.

    • Replies: @von Frey
  198. From patriarchy to nutriarchy.

  199. Mulegino1 says:
    @karel

    The primary preoccupation of the Czech mentality is its desire to maintain its dominant position vis-à-vis the other nationalities which go to form the heterogeneous State which is known as Czecho-Slovakia. It is the fervent wish of every Czech to absorb all the non-Czechs. The Czechs look upon the 3,500,000 Sudeten Germans as alien intruders in “their” country and visualize their gradual disappearance as a corporate entity. Prague has repeatedly stated its determination to expropriate German-owned land and thus to spread the Czech language to the frontiers of the new State.

    Every possible means has been employed during the twenty years of the Republic’s existence in the attempt to arrive at this goal. Systematic destruction of Sudeten German industry and means of livelihood has been undertaken to this end.

    The economic distress now prevalent in Sudeten German areas is probably worse than in any other part of Europe. The unemployment figures have attained a record height and standards of living, low already, continue to fall. This is not the result of the world economic crisis, nor can it be traced to general trade conditions in Czecho-Slovakia. It is purely and simply the result of the Czech determination to [50] exterminate by one means or another those Germans who are compelled to live within the marches of the Republic.

    Bertram de Colonna, “Czecho-Slovakia Within” Chapter 9

    Sorry, more and more of us are not buying the “ebil big Nazi aggressor” and “poor widdle Nazi victim” line anymore without nuance, objectivity and historical context.

    • Agree: Fart Blossom
    • Replies: @karel
  200. @Dr. Robert Morgan

    You ooze dishonesty, Dr.R.M.

    Yes, it appears to have been a Jew by the name of Jacob Schiff that exercised a great deal of influence in keeping the door open to obviously unsavory, incompatible immigrants who had soiled their nest in Russia.

    https://duckduckgo.com/?t=ffab&q=%22jacob+schiff%22+immigration+cleveland&ia=web

    Obviously treacherous shabbos goyim are a significant part of the problem.

    • Replies: @geokat62
  201. Not all White nations are equal; Spain had a great early bird advantage in taking over the Americas, yet it could not establish a country like the United States; I do not understand why the Anglo Saxon descendants still insist on celebrating Columbus, when the direct descendants of Columbus’ great gift to Spain have stopped bothering about him. Now, dont get me wrong, Anglo Saxons do have the right to celebrate Columbus, but my question is why bother. You have a lot many Americans living among you, whose views should be celebrated.

    The Left, or whosoever that is trying to let everyone invade the United States, do not bother about the niceties of logic. There is a vast continent that is overwhelmingly Black, where there is no racism (according to their narrative), but they insist that Blacks from all over the world must immigrate to the United States where the very atmosphere is polluted with racism. All their arguments get reduced down to one thing: that whatever the Anglo Saxons have created in the US is the property of all the mankind. A genius told me once that the New World is a common inheritance for all the people of the Old World; when I asked him if this logic applies to Latin America, he was confused, but he stood firm about his belief. What I am seeing is a great cheating, of all people involved – the Americans whose hard work is now thrown open to invaders, and the invaders who stupidly pay huge sums for invading the US. Now the question is, who gains when both the sides lose in a confrontation?

    • Replies: @Robert Dolan
  202. @Mike Tre

    Biff, Corvinus, and Katrinka are trolls.

    • Troll: Corvinus
    • Replies: @RockaBoatus
  203. @Old Brown Fool

    Who benefits?

    I think it must be the Amish.

    • Agree: von Frey
  204. geokat62 says:
    @Rumpelstiltskin

    Yes, it appears to have been a Jew by the name of Jacob Schiff that exercised a great deal of influence in keeping the door open to obviously unsavory, incompatible immigrants who had soiled their nest in Russia

    .

    Thanks for sharing this important information. I was completely unaware of this aspect of the immigration drama of the late 19th century.

    This is from one of the sources pulled up by your DDG search:

    At a time when Jewish influence in America was relatively minor, and Jewish numbers were yet very small, it was Schiff’s cajoling of the outgoing U.S. President, and former New York Governor, Grover Cleveland (D) that prevented the massive wave of Jewish immigration to America from being shut down.

    So, it looks like Jacob Schiff was a very busy man. Not only was he financing the Bolshevik Revolution, he was also working hard to help his co-religionists make aliyah to the new Promised Land!

  205. geokat62 says:
    @Robert Dolan

    The vaccine is safe and effective.

    Jan 6th was an insurrection.

    Russian collusion got Trump elected.

    The check is in the mail.

    I won’t come in your mouth.

    Just to add to your list…

    JFK was killed by a lone gunman.

    The USS Liberty was mistaken identity.

    9/11 had no Israeli fingerprints.

    The Torah does not discriminate against the goys.

  206. Miro23 says:
    @TTSSYF

    Also, conservative positions are more difficult to articulate and defend because they require hard choices and cost-benefit analysis. It’s much easier to be a liberal and preach peace, love, and joy, with no talk of self-restraint, self-discipline, or self-reliance. Liberalism is like a gas ever-expanding into the atmosphere.

    What liberals eventually get after the peace, love and joy is state-restraint, state-discipline and state-reliance.

    • Agree: TTSSYF
  207. Miro23 says:
    @HT

    Continuing to ignore the Jew role in the demise of white America and pretending it doesn’t exist will mean no hope of stopping this quiet genocide.

    This is sort of obvious. It’s not Blacks, Latinos or Asians funding politicians, owning the media, pushing the 9/11 and Covid narratives, determining US foreign policy and using the FED as a personal piggy bank. Also, it’s not Blacks, Latinos and Asians developing the “White Supremacy” narrative and forcing CRT and gender fluidity narratives into schools.

  208. @Robert Dolan

    Thank you for your comments. My choice of wording wasn’t the best. I fully recognize that millions of average Whites did NOT know what was occurring, even though perhaps some of our elected officials may have known quite well. But they went along with it nonetheless.

    Much of what White Americans and Europeans were fed in term of social policies and new cultural attitudes should have deeply alarmed the majority of them. I understand that it happened incrementally so it may not have been as discernible. But for whatever reason, comparatively few Whites bothered to sound the alarm and resist the Jewish Brave New World we were entering.

    Interestingly, almost every voice that was raised to alarm the public about the new changes was soon stifled, persecuted, and mocked by the lying press. Dissidents were always portrayed as crackpots and losers since the 1940s.

  209. @Corvinus

    I suspect that you are Jewish or a Jewish sympathizer, and so you must defend the ‘Tribe’ at all costs. I get it. I understand your desire to not be confused with the facts because your mind is already made up. You ask questions in order to waste my time with endless rebuttals and counter rebuttals.

    There are a multitude of books that document plainly that elite and international Jews have morally and culturally subverted Europe and America. I will list some of them not for your sake, but for others who are genuine and who are assiduous in their pursuit of Truth.

    To name just a few, consider Douglas Reed, ‘The Controversy of Zion’; Kevin MacDonald, ‘The Culture of Critique’; The numerous works by Herve Ryssen which delves in-depth into the narcissistic and pathological mindset of far too many Jews; Thomas Dalton, ‘Eternal Strangers: Critical View of Jews and Judaism through the Ages’; the books of David Duke; and so many others.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  210. @Vinnyvette

    Thank you. I just discovered that reality in dealing with Corvinus.

  211. Miro23 says:
    @HammerJack

    Sort of reminds me of the people whose ‘bacon’ we saved in WW2. Gratitude? Ha! They’ve been on a full-court press to destroy us ever since.

    Looking at this from a Game Theory point of view (WW2 Jewish refugees arriving in the US), the optimal Tit for Tat result would have been their best long term strategy.

    But then it would depend on how they interpret Tit for Tat:

    1) “You Europeans expelled us from there (Europe) so now we’re going to expel you from here (United States).

    2) “You European Americans rescued us from there (WW2 Europe) so now we’ll repay you with loyalty and service here (United States).”

    Jewish activists have opted for 1) rather than 2) which means that the current optimal US Anglo Tit for Tat reaction is also 1).

    An Ethic Based on the Prisoner’s Dilemma

    The lesson of the prisoner’s dilemma, that Tit for Tat is the soundest and even the most ethical strategy, runs counter to the teachings of the New Testament. Instead of turning the other cheek, Tit for Tat teaches you the old Testament doctrine of an eye for an eye. In my childhood, the phrase tit for tat never denoted justice; instead, it always was used to describe childish retaliation escalating into uncontrollable hostility. It was said with a sneer: “Yes, that would be tit for tat, wouldn’t it?” The message was always to rise above the other person’s behavior, to be the first to act like a grownup and promote cooperation.

    Tit for Tat is not the best of ethical standards–that of Jesus, Gandhi and Dr. King, all murder victims, may well be–but Tit for Tat may in fact be the best ethics available for those who wish to survive in our imperfect world.

    https://www.spectacle.org/995/ethic.html

  212. von Frey says:
    @Fart Blossom

    Anyway any links to any articles you’ve written?

    Meh. I suppose it’s unfair of me to expect Taylor to have any solutions (final or otherwise).

    I think I’d just like to see a decent 25 Point Program from someone who has the will and the charisma to lead us out of this disaster. Sometimes the one-thousand four-hundred eighty-eighth rehash of the NQ is one too many.

    • Replies: @Fart Blossom
  213. von Frey says:
    @Uncle Sam

    I am sure there are many patriotic Americans in the military who could organize such a coup and effectively carry it out.

    I am equally sure that there are not. I think, instead, what we have learned over the past few years is the opposite… there are a large majority of soldiers who, if Brandon ordered them to fire on their own people, they would gladly do so. We also learned that even the most common sense order issued by the previous president was likely to be ignored by the officer corps (halting the free tranny surgery program, for example) if it didn’t fit the current revolutionary agenda.

    I don’t imagine the Jews would go to all the trouble of infiltrating academia for all these years and forget to undermine the military.

  214. JM says:
    @Dr. Charles Fhandrich

    She looks like a frenzied, righteous, NE Puritan.

  215. geokat62: “Why not debate the counterpoints I raised … ”

    Because you raised no substantive counterpoints. Are you really unaware that “blah blah blah goy, lol” isn’t a counterpoint? The closest you came to a counterpoint was when you attempted to pass off a wikipedia cite as a definitive answer to the fact that the 1924 law allowed for UNLIMITED immigration from the Western hemisphere. But that’s a laughable response. The fact that UNLIMITED immigration of non-whites was allowed proves the 1924 Act wasn’t a defense of white racial interests and wasn’t racially “restrictionist” at all. That point stands unrefuted, as do the others.

    geokat62: “Instead, you choose to jump on the fact that I pointed out the goys made a colossal mistake in their immigration policies, by making the feeble argument that whites are responsible for nothing. ”

    Well, what exactly do you hold them responsible for if not for their own decisions? You have a very low opinion of white people if you think they are unable to resist whenever Jews want them to do something. Why anyone would think they are defending whites by advancing such a slanderous objection remains a mystery, at least to me. Much more credible is my point that the 1965 Immigration Act is more properly seen as just another instance of white Christian American virtue signaling, a racially self-destructive practice whites have engaged in ever since the country’s founding. An examination of history easily shows there has always been a strong current of anti-racism in America. Most notably and disastrously, it surfaced in the 19th century when whites gave negroes citizenship and the vote. It surfaced again in opposition to Hitler, and yet again during the Cold War in the 1965 Act, which passed Congress with overwhelming support from both parties. Even Taylor now acknowledges this above in a series of rhetorical questions, so maybe he’s finally wising up, though that’s probably too much to hope for:

    Ladies and gentlemen, we’re here today because our country is dying. It’s hard to say exactly when it fell sick. Was it in the 1960s? Maybe the 1860s? Was it infected from the start?

    But contra Taylor, it isn’t hard to say at all. It’s clear that a moribund anti-racist streak has always been there in white Christian America. It’s just hard for him (and you) to admit it.

    • Replies: @geokat62
  216. @TKK

    On a new project I started at my second job, the “Team Leader” is named LaRonnie. She has not passed the Bar her first try, but hey? Who cares? She was made Team Leader anyway, and the partner signs her pleading “until I pass that thing”. It is enough to make day drinking very seductive.

    Cheer up. The day isn’t long in coming when “LaRonnie” and other oxygen-thieving niggresses like her will be mopping the floors, the job they were genetically designed to do from Day One (think of black women as collectively being Aldous Huxley’s “Epsilon Simi-morons” in Brave New World), in the office buildings they once pretended to work as professionals in. The only time you’ll ever see her is on your way out the door at the end of the work day, and then only for a few seconds in passing. That assumes, of course, that there will even be any office buildings left standing after Civil War II ends, or that white-collar professionals will need them anymore.

    • Replies: @Gugwee
  217. @Reg Cæsar

    The ridiculous claims made on those slave auction posters– “hard worker”, “good character”– are the seeds of this madness.

    Advertising hasn’t changed at all throughout human history. White people in the market for slave labor no more believed advertising labels on the product than parents of yesteryear believed the BS labels on kids cereal boxes claiming that the sugary, carb-loaded crap was “fortified with extra vitamins and minerals.” Except to the extent that they had imported a destructive species into not only the country, but their own homes, these slave-holding white people were not stupid or naive enough to think that niggroes had any natural redeeming qualities of their own that wouldn’t have to be conditioned into them.

  218. @CelestiaQuesta

    If every senator, congressman and their alphabets were required by law to learn by heart the US Constitution and B of R’s, Americans would be in a better place than with anti constitutional, anti white assault now taking place.

    Wrong. Just because they would be forced to learn it doesn’t mean they would respect it or take it to heart. Remember: Satan can quote Scripture just as readily Jesus can.

  219. All of this is the wrong approach, describing and addressing a delusion that will lead to even greater social catastrophe! we already have that catastrophe…Covid and a massive genocide in progress

    This is the way I would go myself! There is much more to the issue but this is very good enough to lead where we must go to save humanity.

    “The story used to be that we discovered the continent, tamed it, built a nation, gave it is institutions, and made it great. We built monuments to our heroes and felt pretty good about ourselves. And then — generously and foolishly — we let in people from all over the world to a successful country they could never have built. And the story today? The complete opposite of what it was. We’re the problem. We’re the only real problem. All our heroes were actually criminals. And every white man, woman, child, and newborn baby is a criminal. From birth.

    What’s more, the country we thought was great and that attracted people from everywhere was actually a pest hole. We were too stupid to know it, but America was a cesspool of xenophobia, male chauvinism, homophobia, and racism. So now, when we think of all the Third-Worlders who poured in by the millions, we weren’t doing them a favor. They did us a favor. We were choking to death on our own miserable, bigoted homogeneity until they brought us diversity. They brought us America’s greatest strength. And the more alien, incomprehensible, and unassimilable they are, the greater the strength they bring. They rescued us from that horrible almost-all-white country our ancestors had built.”

    Not quite the truth that. its the way we do business…the business of routine liffe!

  220. There is much about the UR I love a whole lot! and I love how Unz posts up all comments. But the racism of this board though open and not deceitful, is all the same backward, old, and full of delusional and catastrophic potential, which along with the current genocide is going to take America right out

    It is time for ordinary Americans to wake up and smell the roses! America is on its way out unless ordinary American stop being assholes, rise up and take their country back and run it the way they want it to be run..to meet the needs of all the people.

    That is the problem not race and religion and all that crap. IT IS TIME TO SEE THE TRUTH OF THE ‘RACE’ OF HUMANITY, ESTABLISH ITS SCIENTIFIC TRUTH AND PUT IT ASIDE AND GO DIRECTLY TO ADDRESS THE REAL ISSUE…THE ECONOMY AND HOW IT MUST BE RUN, TO SOLVE THE UTTER USELESSNESS THAT IS THE UTTERLY UNSUSTAINABLE CAPITALISM THE PEOPLE BELIEVE IS THE ONLY WAY TO GO…WHICH IS IN FACT THE REAL CATASTROPHE!

    Science has established beyond any and all doubt that homo sapiens began Black and that in the Black woman we have the biological ability to produce what have become Chinese, Indian, White people. The Black woman did that and here we are on our war. still going still changing mutating as we go. It wont ever stop until humanity passes from existence which I hope never happens, that we wind ways to live on indefinitely.

    The white race rose up and dominated, exploited everybody, but most exhaustively Black people. The white elite classes changed the history of the world to reflect the Black part of it not as the fundamental it is but a peripheral, insignificant, disgusting contribution. That is what informs the attitude of the world towards Black people currently. Slowly however it is changing back to its truth, improving the relationship between Black people with the rest of the human species.

    We can now begin to put race aside, into its proper place, taking it out of our eyes as the massive, divisive and extraordinarily violent blinder that it has been and still is, that allows the current elites that has become noticeably multi-ethnic itself, to develop and institute a program our of own genocide right in our faces and getting away with it

    It is time for the ordinary people of the whole world to rise up and put an end to capitalism, to arrest and put away the capitalist class and begin to run the world multilaterally in the interest of ordinary people. we are past the kings and royalty and now we are past elites. it is time for democracy and only ordinary people can make democracy by direct popular control and management of the nations

    That is the next progressive evolutionary step forward in the social evolution of humanity. It is either we take that step or segue back into extreme elitist control, this time with the technological element expressed… which means the end of humanity as we have know it as Homo Sapiens

  221. If!  When the American people rise up and take their country, they can go past China now that China has ‘made a success’ of their own revolution.

    Immediately America comes home to itself, imperialism over and focuses on meeting America’s needs.  

    NO MORE CAPITALISM!  HOW DO WE MAKE A SUSTAINABLE ECONOMY THAT MEETS OUR NEED AS WE GO?

    HOW DO WE ORGANIZE STRUCTURALLY TO ACHIEVE SUCH AN END?   WHO CAN FOCUS ON SUCH ISSUE AS THE FUNDAMENTAL SOCIAL ISSUE WE MUST DEAL WITH?  

    The ordinary American people that’s who, in charge and making the decisions themselves in the process of doing the job themselves…working and discussing and deciding in the process…no longer concerned with the profits of a minority group of billionaire/trillionaire parasites, free lunches all the way…like getting the govern to pay a billion dollars to develop vaccines that they then give to Big Pharma for a dollar and pay them trillions more to make and saturate the world with…vaccines that are the source of genocide

    And foolish posters  here look at ordinary people who for whatever reason get a bit of welfare as
    free-lunchers and parasites when there is bunch of utterly parasitical people free-lunching off the people by the trillions

    By the rise of the people to national control America can rise again as nation not an empire, in a generation to hold its own with Russian and China and with the national interest no longer in empire and war can make deals with the nations of the world in mutual benefit, in peace that do no lead to war anymore.

    America will never lose its ability to defend itself with its nuclear arsenal intact.  American will in time renew its military fully, bring itself up to the level generally with the Russians and Chinese…a fact that would ensure that a non imperial USA would be an assist for peace, by its ability to take care of itself

  222. @karel

    Scotch refers to whisky whereas Scots/Scottish refers to the nation. The Scots have red hair whereas the communists had a red flag. Do get your facts right before joining the conversation.

    • Replies: @karel
  223. @von Frey

    I think I’d just like to see a decent 25 Point Program from someone who has the will and the charisma to lead us out of this disaster.

    Meh.

    I suppose it’s unfair of me to expect Taylor to have any solutions (final or otherwise).

    You may keep dreaming, but when has there ever been anyone with the will and the charisma, let alone the ability, to lead anyone out of anything? And besides, what makes you think you or anyone else deserves either a messiah or an endless and perpetual supply of milk from mama for that matter? And besides, “fairness” is obviously in rare supply in this world. Fairness? Thanks for the laugh.

    Here’s the solution: People need to grow up. But we all know that will never happen, so there is no solution.

    Sweet dreams!

  224. Corvinus says:
    @Mike Tre

    “If Jared Taylor wants to remain relevant within the topic of racial discourse – or rather, discord – then he should begin writing pieces related to weapons training and guerilla tactics.”

    LOL, you don’t have the smarts nor will to do anything about it, so act all tough? Rather, you hope someone else pulls a Kyle and then you can lionize him. It’s really sick on your part.

  225. Blodgie says:

    Christians are born to lose and that’s the way they like it.

    Their leader and hero was murdered in the most humiliating manner possible which they tried to turn into a victory—the biggest cope of all time.

    When the goal of the religion is to sacrifice yourself, you end up with the America we have.

  226. Corvinus says:
    @RockaBoatus

    “I suspect that you are Jewish or a Jewish sympathizer, and so you must defend the ‘Tribe’ at all costs.”

    LOL, no. I am goy, pure goy. See, you’re only proving my point. Anyone who dares to question your prescribed narrative MUST be Jewish or a Hasbara troll or a Jewish asset. Rather, I am a white person, like millions of other white people, who see everything clearly, and it bothers you to your core, that we have made our own decisions.

    “You ask questions in order to waste my time with endless rebuttals and counter rebuttals.”

    Not waste time, but seek answers, which lead to truth.

    Must all white people subscribe to your position? Do we not have free will? What makes you the artbiter of truth? If white people do not hold to your line of thinking, what do you propose to do with us? These are important questions.

    There are a multitude of books that document plainly that elite and international Jews have morally and culturally subverted Europe and America. I will list some of them not for your sake, but for others who are genuine and who are assiduous in their pursuit of Truth.

    “narcissistic and pathological mindset of far too many…”

    Of the authors you listed, I which I am already quite familiar with. I get it. It’s hard for you to understand because you’ve been programmed and hardened by confirmation bias.

    • Replies: @Blodgie
    , @RockaBoatus
  227. karel says:
    @GeneralRipper

    Is this your mansion? Are you a vampire?

  228. TTSSYF says:
    @Dr. Charles Fhandrich

    I think people overestimate what is revealed in the eyes and underestimate what’s revealed by the mouth. It’s her mouth, not her eyes, that reflects her insanity.

    • Replies: @Dr. Charles Fhandrich
  229. karel says:
    @Fart Blossom

    Do not need any lessons from you. Members of my family also had also few reasons to cry about their murdered relatives during the Protectorate. Maybe Germans are the better Aryans. Are you a nazi Strolch?

    • Replies: @Fart Blossom
  230. Mevashir says:
    @Antiochus

    Thank you for this terrific comment. God has a sense of humor, because today is coming up to the last day of Hanukkah the festival in which Antiochus was the great enemy of the Jews whose military was vanquishee by Jewish extremist terrorists. I think your comment provides deep insight into the holiday of Hanukkah. I used to be ultra-orthodox and of course happily considered the Greeks to be my enemy. But later on I learned that Antiochus was promoting Greek culture throughout the empire and was working to oppose extremist religious groups, and I stopped viewing the Maccabee story so favorably. But your comment prompts me to think that maybe the error of Antiochus is that he offered the freedom of Greek thought and culture to the Jews without any form, in fact by opposing and destroying the form that their religion provided to them, does evoking the Violent macabee response.

    Your comment is fantastically insightful. Thank you for explaining freedom and form. I couldn’t agree with you more. I have a friend from Australia who’s been in the US for 50 years. He’s deathly afraid of the Chinese and considers xi jinping to be something again to Genghis Khan. This friend is 100 pounds overweight suffers from diabetes COPD and other health problems. I asked him if he’s ever seen an obese Chinese? He defames and denounces the Chinese while his own life is in the sewer.

    I think you explain the Chinese attitude to their society’s control mechanisms very well. I used to go to a Chinese masseuse. She was talented attractive intelligent spoke decent English hygienic and scrupulously honest. She told me that she and her friends all consider xi jinping a great Chinese leader. Every Chinese person I have met almost without exception has these qualities. Above all they have self-respect something that’s collapsed in America.

    I personally look forward to a world dominated by China. Just comparing Panda Express restaurants with McDonald’s should leave little doubt which culture is superior. I hope the transition will be as painless and untraumatic as possible.

    I also hope that the obnoxious commenter Chinaman’s Nightmare reads your comment and ponders it carefully.

    [MORE]

    I attended Harvard College where I was exposed to freedom without form. It was the late 1970s and they campus was full of privileged narcissistic students who happily indulged in sex and drugs and rock n roll all the while smugly assured of their ticket to success. They weren’t particularly intelligent but they were good grinding nerds for the establishment. My classmates constitute the leadership of the failed American society of today. I’ve written to many of them about topics on the Unz Review and they respond blankly like deer staring into headlights. Completely uncreative and unimaginative dullards.

    After college I moved to Israel and joined an ultra-orthodox community. The extreme forms of that society gave me a kind of happiness I had never experienced before and the five or so years I was in that community were probably the best of my life.

    I’ve been back in the US since 2006. I’m one of those Jews who is an outsider not only because of my beliefs but because I’m on the economic fringes. I collect welfare and EBT but fortunately do not live in a trailer park. I think that the Jewish elites in America have selfishly destroyed the Christian form that provided foundation and support to our society and replaced it with sports television Hollywood and supermarket tabloids. As usual the Jews have been greedy and selfish looking out for their own interests even as they oversee the destruction of the broader culture. Much as they did in Weimar Germany in the 1930s. I fear for the future of American Jews but I don’t sympathize with the travails that they are going to face. They brought it all entirely upon themselves.

    I like to watch Vladimir Putin on YouTube. Until recently when I learned that he’s trying to force a vaccine mandate on Russians, I considered him the best politician in the world. I’ve seen his four hour spontaneous press conferences where he takes phone calls from all over Russia and expounds on any and all topics extemporaneously. He’s as erudite as any professor and far more savvy.

    But anyway, I’m impressed that Putin is spiritually tolerant even though he appears to be a devout Russian Orthodox Christian. And it occurred to me that because Russia has such a strong Christian identity it can afford to be tolerant of other groups like the Jews Muslims and Buddhists who live within its vast domain, precisely because it has a secure sense of identity. This is precisely the problem in America. We do not have an agreed-upon national identity, and we’ve degenerated into all-out cultural warfare.

    While a lot of this situation is due to perverse Jewish influence, not all of it is by any means. The WASP establishment imported ethnic outsiders in an effort to flood America with a cheap source of labor. These outsiders in the early 1900s were mainly Jews and Catholics who now have risen to the top echelons of society. That’s why we have a supreme court with seven Catholic and two Jewish justices. American Christianity is particularly obnoxious, tending to fundamentalism and painting foreign cultures with broad degrading and ignorant stereotypes. I’ve been in churches that lament China’s resistance to Christianity. And I swallowed the party line until I read some Chinese history and learned of their disastrous encounter with Christianity in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. My attitude today is that it is a miracle the Chinese tolerate Christianity at all given the unfortunate experiences they endured starting with the British opium wars and moving forward.

    American Catholicism is also uninspiring. Although American Catholics are the most wealthy and influential Catholic society in the world, they don’t evangelize their faith effectively, they act like a secretive furtive cult, and of course they are inundated with clergy abuse scandals and other forms of corruption.

    The lack of appeal of American Christianity has contributed to the collapse of this form and led to the rise of all sorts of garish and banal forms of entertainment and the popular adoration of celebrities. This is the American national religion: the worshipping of celebrities the lusting for money power pleasure and privilege. With 90% or more of the population living lives of quiet desperation vicariously experiencing the thrills of the wealthy and the powerful via television movies and tabloids. We truly are living in an empty desolate depressing society. We can only hope that the Chinese will take over management of the globe to the benefit of everyone. Amen

    PS when I was a child, my father attended a medical conference in Tokyo. when he returned home he told us that he could walk anywhere and that enormous City day or night without any fear for his personal safety. he said where he not a far an outsider, you would be perfectly happy living in a place like that. I ride the city bus has regularly and have witnessed how they have become mobile homeless shelters for the vile HADAMI population:
    Homeless
    Alcoholic
    Drug Addict
    Mentally Ill

    Just before Christmas two years ago I was attacked by a drunken redneck on one of the buses and had to pepper spray him which resulted in a 1-week long police investigation into whether I had legitimately defended myself or whether I was in fact the perpetrator. After reviewing the bus video camera footage they exonerated me.

    The replacement of the vile American society with something better cannot happen soon enough.

  231. As a student of history I have observed a pattern in which almost every nation has a civil war of some sort on an average of 150 years. The United States is overdue. I suspect the coming war will end both the “Western Empire” (consisting of the United States, United Kingdom, Israel and the European Union) and the United States as a unified polity. Unless things change direction I foresee the United States and Canada breaking up into 4 to 6 warring successor states some of which are client states of the emerging Eurasian power currently represented by the SCO alliance.

  232. geokat62 says:
    @Dr. Robert Morgan

    The fact that UNLIMITED immigration of non-whites was allowed proves the 1924 Act wasn’t a defense of white racial interests and wasn’t racially “restrictionist” at all. That point stands unrefuted, as do the others.

    Unrefuted, huh? lol!

    Rather than allowing UNLIMITED immigration of non-whites into the country (which is a ridiculous proposition on its face), the following article, LaRaza: Mexicans in the United States Census, explains the real reasons why Johnson-Reed never placed restrictions on people from the Western Hemisphere.

    The Census Bureau was struggling to create the new category of Mexican in order to ban Mestizos from entering the country. The objective was to get their immigration policy to more closely align with their eligibility criteria for citizenship: free white persons and persons of African nativity and descent.

    While it’s true that there were never any official restrictions placed on immigration from Latin America in the 1924 Immigration Act, it’s also true that in practical terms there was no appetite to allow millions of Mestizos to enter the country, as attested by Mexican Repatriation of the 1930s.

    The 1965 Immigration Act changed all that. Immigrants from all over the world were welcome, including Mestizos. That’s why most people view the 1924 Immigration Act as restrictionist and the 1965 Immigration Act as non-restrictionist.

    Excerpts from LaRaza: Mexicans in the United States Census:

    Glenn E. Hoover, writing in Foreign Affairs in 1929, argued that Mexicans were largely Indian in background and their immigration thereby violated the clause in the Immigration Act of 1924 excluding the entry of immigrants racially ineligible for citizenship, then available only to “‘free white persons and to persons of African nativity or descent.’”

    Attention to the indigenous origins of Mexican immigrants appeared in both the English- and Spanish-language press. The New York Times applauded Hoover’s analysis, agreeing that Mexican immigration might well lead “to a new ‘race’ problem,” since “those who enter are largely Indian in blood, with only a veneer of Spanish culture.

    For those interested, here is the larger passage from which the above excerpt was taken…

    [MORE]

    mass immigration and race classification in the united states census

    While Census Bureau officials rarely voiced openly racist views, they were, like most intellectuals in the early twentieth century, influenced by an ascendant belief in inherited racial distinctions that affected character and behavior.2 They were also sensitive to the effects of immigrants from new origins. Francis Amasa Walker, director of the 1870 and 1880 censuses and the intellectual patriarch of the bureau, had, like Henry Cabot Lodge and other restrictionists, begun to voice a neo-Lamarckian view of hereditary inferiority in Southern and Eastern European immigrants. Joseph A. Hill, assistant director for the 1920 and 1930 censuses and a prominent figure in the bureau, epitomized Walker’s legacy. In the first decades of the twentieth century, he and other bureau staff engaged in a debate about the meaning of race that led to the creation of the Mexican race category.3
    Joel Perlmann provides close analyses of deliberations within the census, a discussion influenced by the Dillingham Commission’s extensive and politicized assessment of immigration.4 The debate did not result in a firm conclusion: among bureau staff, race remained an ambiguous term, at times a synonym for ethnicity subject to change, especially through assimilation, and at other times implying a more permanent, hereditary, and biological condition. Concern about high levels of immigration in the early twentieth century was manifest in bureau studies and in the private commentary of staff. Aware of the diverse populations within European territorial boundaries, bureau staff resisted expansion of the race variable to include categories among white Europeans, but they did introduce a mother-tongue question in 1910 designed to identify ethnic or “racial” origins more accurately than country of birth. In planning the 1920 census, Hill saw as “more important than ever before” questions on nativity and language, the latter providing “fairly accurate racial classication of our white population of foreign birth or foreign parentage.”5 Still, until 1930 the census race variable remained reflective of the widely accepted “grand divisions” of white, Indian, African American, and Asian origin categories.
    Nothing in documents before the 1920s reveals a particular concern about Mexicans or their racial makeup. Daniel Folkmar’s influential Dictionary of Races and Peoples, produced for the Dillingham Commission, casually referenced Mexicans as largely of “Indian or mixed origin.” Census analysis of Indian groups in the Southwest did not lead bureau staff to speculate on the racial makeup of persons of Mexican origin in the region.6 Indeed, the problem of classifying Mexicans came to the bureau in the 1920s as an unwelcome surprise, sprung on them by the sudden arrival of large numbers of Mexican immigrants.

    the origins of the 1930 racial category

    Mexican immigration in the nineteenth century had been modest. Individuals casually crossed an unmarked border, but more permanent entry was rare; census birthplace data indicate fewer than five thousand immigrants from Mexico per year before 1900. The only large concentration of native-born Hispanics, in northern New Mexico, clung somewhat successfully to an argument that they were of Spanish rather than Mexican origin. By the 1920s, however, immigration from Mexico had risen dramatically, exceeding eighty thousand per year in the data available to Census Bureau officials.7 While not equivalent to the flow of Europeans before restriction, the arrival of Mexicans in places where they had not previously settled incited a sharp nativist reaction. Given the rising influence of racial theory among intellectuals, the racialized conceptualization of European immigrants already embedded in immigration law, and the racist view of Mexicans in many locales in the Southwest, it was axiomatic that xenophobia toward Mexicans would take on a racial tone. It did. In 1921, former Congressman James Slayden concluded that “in Texas the word Mexican is used to indicate the race, not a citizen or subject of the country.” Persons born in Texas of Mexican ancestry “are ‘Mexicans’ just as all blacks are Negroes though they may have five generations of American ancestors.” Eugenicists such as Charles Goethe warned of the demographic and social calamity in the mass arrival of the “Amer-ind (American Indian) peon.” Congressional attempts to extend restrictionist quotas to Mexicans often used racial inferiority as a justification.8
    Despite the standing position of the 1897 In re Rodriguez decision that the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo made Mexicans eligible for citizenship (and were therefore considered white for naturalization requirements), restrictionists sought their prohibition on racial grounds. Glenn E. Hoover, writing in Foreign Affairs in 1929, argued that Mexicans were largely Indian in background and their immigration thereby violated the clause in the Immigration Act of 1924 excluding the entry of immigrants racially ineligible for citizenship, then available only to “‘free white persons and to persons of African nativity or descent.’”9
    Attention to the indigenous origins of Mexican immigrants appeared in both the English- and Spanish-language press. The New York Times applauded Hoover’s analysis, agreeing that Mexican immigration might well lead “to a new ‘race’ problem,” since “those who enter are largely Indian in blood, with only a veneer of Spanish culture.” La Prensa, the San Antonio paper with the greatest influence among the Spanish-reading population in the Southwest, judged nearly all persons of Mexican origin to be primarily Indian in ancestry (including New Mexicans). However, like most of the Spanish-language press, La Prensa argued that admixture yielded virtues rather than vices, publishing pieces by the Mexican intellectual José Vasconcelos, who celebrated the Mexican mestizo as a new and gifted race.10 The noted anthropologist Manuel Gamio, a well-known scholar of Mexican immigration, had a less optimistic take on the Indian side of the equation, pointing to educational, cultural, and economic deficiencies. But he and other post-revolutionary intellectuals saw the integration of the Mexican population in mestizaje as essential in forjando patria, the construction of a nation founded on a unique and worthy race. Belief in the superiority of the “blended bronze and iron” of the mestizo, an inversion of the idea that hybrid races were degenerate, was firmly established in Mexico among intellectuals and celebrated by the state. Mexican American civil rights activists regu- larly voiced the same conviction.11
    In the bureau, intense concern with recent immigration can be seen in the generational boundaries placed on the 1930 Mexican-race category: “In order to obtain separate figures for this racial group, it has been decided that all persons born in Mexico, or having parents born in Mexico, who are not definitely white, Negro, Indian, Chinese, or Japanese, should be returned as Mexican.” Instructions to enumerators noted the mixed racial background of “Mexican laborers,” emphasizing that those “not definitely” of another race be entered as Mexican.12 The limitation to two generations recalled attempts to define European “races” in the early twentieth century, in which assimilation and loss of ethnicity was conceivable.13 Still, a racial function appears manifest: census questions on birthplace and parental birthplace would have identified all those of recent Mexican immigrant origin. Officials knew most Mexican immigrants were mestizo in origin, but others appeared to be largely European: they wanted a measure of race within the population of Mexicans arriving in the United States.

    https://dl022.vdocument.in/dlv2/cd7aa4a2f81092dd84fa1b6fc4e6fe38a0bbb6fdd9db7b472ef266a28d86691079bc8ecb4654dc999fe5a76bf7c05185930e279c852dbcffe5babaabd012d560r2tmGU+7UXgFHgDezFTOcdxH++1ftLij4QBT40mOdCCKXPHfWub%2FmaSxWqIcsXsffysiP%2Fiu8wCBYxiKJqMFDJTEBoENASZRrLGw8mLudtYjVcItLyNTvmf15JtUbpGoND1i3oPWgB9HIwcNT0C1s%2F9LeA4VXSisuQ7bnGKvi+c%3D

  233. @Corvinus

    I have to say that of all the commenters, I’ve come across, posting on forums, for the last 25 years, you are the one whom I shake my head in disbelief at constantly.

    From your reply to RockaBoatus, what you state just beggars belief.

    “Assuming that there has been this Jewish cultural subversion.”

    I think you’ll find that there very much has been. Other than the many articles on here, that have proven contrary to your statement, Professor Kevin McDonald, E Michael Jones, Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn and a host of others have promoted jewish, cultural revolution over the non jewish peoples of the lands they’ve invaded.

    I have no desire to go on and dissect your post because it’s laughable, to say the least and your arguments have been thoroughly demolished by the aforementioned authors. Regardless what you may like to believe, there IS a ‘wizard behind the curtain’ (really should have said ‘snake-oil’ salesman as that’s what the wizard really was in Frank L Baum’s novel) and there very much has been a concerted effort, by organized jewry to destroy western civilization (read Christian/non jewish/goyim).

    The question is, just what to make of you? There are one of two possible conclusions here. You are, as RockaBoatus states, a jew (masquerading as a white man, as you have stated) or you are, one of those, whom I mentioned in my initial posting here, Yuri Bezmenov spoke about, who, regardless what you tell them, what you show them, they will still not believe a word about any conspiracy and/or foul play afoot to bring harm to your nation and civilization.

    There are most certainly many others on here who most certainly feel the same about you because your conclusions, that there is no jewish conspiracy, proves your overwhelming ignorance of reality.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  234. geokat62 says:

    Brother Nathanael’s take on who was behind the push for Hart-Celler…

    THE JEWISH CONSPIRACY BEHIND THE 1965 OPEN IMMIGRATION LAW

    THE DEATH OF AMERICA was enacted in 1965 with the signing of the Open Immigration Law Of 1965.

    While serving Jewish interests, the Open Immigration Law Of 1965 was the beginning of America’s death as a unified nation. Jews were behind the law, promoting, lobbying, and “bribing” the law into existence with the fanaticism equalling the most dedicated Muslim terrorist.

    Jews have continually evinced hostility toward American Christian culture in their aggressive efforts to change it. The Open Immigration Law Of 1965 is a prime example of that hostility.

    Jews are a paranoid people. Wherever the Jews go they fear Anti-Semitism. (Jews have a guilt complex – and for good reason.) Jews fear a homogenous Christian culture of which they would never ascend to influential positions. Rather, in a homogenous Christian culture, Jews are looked upon, (and rightly so), as “Christ-killers.” This is why the Jews tried to get Mel Gibson’s movie, The Passion of Jesus Christ, removed from the silver screen.

    A typical example of what characterizes the Jewish push for open immigration can be seen in the following 1948 quote by David Petegorsky, former Director of the AJCongress:

    —— “Jewish survival can only take place within the framework of a progressive and expanding democratic society, which through its institutions and public policies gives expression to the concept of cultural pluralism.” ——

    Here Are The Names Of The Jews Behind The Open Immigraton Law of 1965:

    [MORE]

    1. Senator Jacob Javits (NY)
2. Congressman Emanuel Celler (NY)
3. Leo Pfeffer (Former President of
American Jewish Congress (AJC)
4. Norman Podhoretz (Writer and Member of The Council of Foreign Relations)

    * Senator Jacob Javits played a prominent role in the Senate hearings on the 1965 bill. Javits authored an article entitled ‘Let’s open the gates’ that proposed immigration levels of 500,000 per year for 20 years with no restrictions on national origin.

    * Congressman Emanuel Celler, who fought for unrestricted immigration for over 40 years in the House of Representatives, introduced similar legislation resulting in the “Cellar-Hart Immigration Bill,” the precursor to the fatal bill of 1965.

    * Leo Pfeffer, a so-called, “Jewish Intellect,” (translate, “Christ-Hater”), wrote many treatises and books that propagandized for open immigration.

    * Norman Podhoretz, a former leftist, now a Jewish “neo-con,” (he’s still a leftist), also wrote many articles promoting open immigration.

    * Jewish organizations such as the American Jewish Congress, The Jewish Federation, the ACLU, and the B’nai B’rith, (there is no end to their organizations), filed briefs in support of open immigration before the Senate Subcommittee in the early sixties leading up to the passing of the 1965 law.

    THE 1965 OPEN IMMIGRATION LAW IS PRESENTLY fulfilling the aims of the Jewish conspiracy as seen in its effects. The U.S. Census Bureau projects that by the year 2050, European-derived peoples will no longer be a majority of the population of America due to the massive influx of immigrants since the signing of the bill in 1965.

    Most of these immigrants come from Third World Nations whose customs, religions, and culture are far removed from anything remotely resembling Christianity. Within the context of a Jewish-informed “multicultural America,” these immigrants are encouraged by the Jews to retain their own languages, customs, and religions.

    The Jews have also given these immigrants a moral mandate to expand both demographically and politically. And expand they will and do! But any attempts by European-derived peoples to retain demographic, political, and cultural control in America are represented by the Jews as being ‘racist’ and ‘immoral.’

    BOTTOM LINE

    THE JEWS ARE GUILTY of the ruination of America. What can we do to stop them even now before the final sliciing of their knives into the effecting of the circumcision of our nation?

    * The only answer
    is for each and every American to pray for the re-emergence of a Christian America. There is no in between. We must make the best of a bad situation. Let us then all make a commitment to Jesus Christ and regular Church attendance.

    Then and only then can we be “more than conquerors through Him who loves us.” And who will we the conquerors vanquish?

    The enemies of our Lord, the Jews!

    https://www.realjewnews.com/?p=50

    • Thanks: Pat Kittle
  235. Blodgie says:
    @anno nimus

    Ned Flanders himself could not have said it better.

    Be nice.

    Love those that want you dead.

    Turn the other cheek.

    Lose your civilization.

    But hey, you followed the abstract rules so you will go to paradise.

    Winning.

  236. @Robert Dolan

    I’m very aware of the terrible influence Jews have had and continue to have on the USA and the world.

    And from your comments I believe that you and I see eye to eye far more often than not.

    But I don’t buy that no responsibility whatsoever accrues to all the willing, if duped, participants in a now long history of atrocities and idiocies.

    How much difference is there between the average Jew and the average Brit/Anglo or American? Ever less it seems — all three are manipulated, twisted and deformed by the same evil crowd, whose values and thinking they are adopting. The main difference I see is that Jews have had this monkey on their back for far longer, and as a result are farther gone. ‘There but for the grace of God go we.’

    IF one wants to be understanding of ‘whites’ who have been led astray and used by the Judeo-Masonic mafia (or call it what you will), then doesn’t that imply that one ought to apply the same understanding to the mass of more-or-less ‘normal’ Jews who have breen brought up since infancy under such terrible indoctrination?

    Sorta seems so to me, but I’m just thinking out loud, not trying to pretend I have hard and fast answers to what is, after all, called the JQ for a reason…

    I think what is needed is to strike a middle path and try to present a non-apocalyptic vision as an alternative to current tendencies. Something that could peel a diverse array of people away from their legions of ‘useful idiots’.

    Sure, maybe that’s just doodling in the air; reality is likely to be messy. But a worthy vision might make a difference.

    • Replies: @Bookish1
  237. Richard B says:
    @Reg Cæsar

    I think Mr Taylor agrees with Jews– and disagrees with Protestants– that it was wrong for Tennessee and Arkansas to ban teaching Darwin in schools.

    That’s true. They did. Only to cancel science about a hundred years later. How progressive (as in progressive disease).

    And though Jews may have objected to a ban in two states (big deal), some of thier prominent intellectuals certainly objected to Darwin, and those who didn’t placed the focus more on their interpretation of Darwin, as opposed to what Darwin actually wrote.

    A good example of the former would be Gertrude Himmelfarb, Irving Kristol’s wife and Bill Kristol’s mother. And the way she objected to Darwin was interesting and telling, because it’s so typical of what many Jewish intellectuals do.

    She attempted to dismiss Darwin by raising evolutionary problems long since out of date and, significantly, by appealing to the authority of Kierkegaard and Bergson (or her interpretation of them) and by actually ridiculing Darwin’s metaphysical knowledge and abilities (as if he was a philosopher, or worse, a moralizing hack, like her, and not a scientist of the first rank).

    In any event, the point is, in both cases, the anger of the good old boy South and the contempt of the Jewish intellectuals like Himmelfarb, concealed a very real fear. The only difference is, dishonest to the core, the Jewish intellectuals ignored their fear to focus exclusively on the old South’s anger. Again, how progressive.

  238. @karel

    Do not need any lessons from you.

    Nor do I from you, but in any case, I was not offering lessons. I was asking for clarification of your position. As you remarked, above,”Be more specific next time.”

    Anyway, members of my family also have a few reasons to cry about murdered relatives too, but I don’t claim authority on that basis, and coming here with an obvious chip on your shoulder offers nothing of worth.

    Get it?

    • Replies: @karel
    , @karel
  239. Blodgie says:
    @Corvinus

    Corvinus is right.

    And when we ask why, why did our leaders let our country go to shit?

    Religion.

    Specifically Christianity.

    Catholics for example are specifically told that life is suffering that it is noble to suffer, noble to sacrifice.

    This is the unconscious firmware that runs the minds of Tradcons.

    So if life is suffering and the REAL reward is in hebben why should they fight that hard to preserve their own country?

    White men love abstractions and will die for them.

    • Replies: @Bookish1
    , @Anon
  240. geokat62 says:

    The Battle Lines Grow Clearer

    They are, indeed!

    Excerpt from, White Supremacists Stage Bizarro Rally in Downtown D.C., Find Themselves Stranded</i<:

    Asked about the reason for the march, Rousseau said, “Our demonstrations are an exhibition of our unified capability to organize, to show our strength—not as brawlers or public nuisances, but as men capable of illustrating a message and seeking an America that more closely resembles the interests of its true people.”

    https://www.thedailybeast.com/patriot-front-white-nationalists-stage-bizarro-rally-in-downtown-dc-find-themselves-stranded

  241. @Corvinus

    The British and French had been hoodwinked by Hitler. And you are conveniently forgetting a key detail here–the Germans took a fair share of Poland. The U.S. was trying to stay out of the impending war.

    Where did you get that? Sounds backwards to me.

    The U.S. was trying to stay out of the impending war.

    Citation please! Or do you think you’re being funny?

    How do you account for Germany invading several countries and murdering thousands of people?

    You mean liberating them from the radical Reds. Do you even know what the word,”murdering” means?

    Nazis invaded and plundered White-Christian nations.

    Name one. Or are you confused by what the Reds were doing?

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  242. Bookish1 says:
    @Blodgie

    The Jewish religion is doing right for we should be learning from the jews.jews: don’t let an attack of any kind go without revenge. We are still being punished for the destruction of the temple by the Roman’s all the while Christians turning the other cheek.

  243. Maddaugh says:
    @GeneralRipper

    Fuck, that was a sweet video ! I loved the way the one collapsed on the floor and the way he got capped. It was sweet the way he jumped when the cap busted him. Time for a brew so I can look at the video again. LOL

    That’s the way they rock in Brazil. I was in Rio once where the Police executed a black robber in broad daylight with cameras, press etc on the scene. One to the head and the day;s work is done. The investigation into this “illegal shooting” took how long ? Zero seconds !

    In another instance a barge captain out a round into the neck of a 14 year old river pirate, threw him back overboard and continued with his day. He had a schedule to keep !

    As I said in my original comment. We put up with their shit in the US so they go on and on. Other countries, even black ones, fuck them up right there. Blacks in the US better smarten up !

    • Troll: Corvinus
  244. Bookish1 says:
    @Rumpelstiltskin

    good point that some jews are victims of their own indoctrination. But they are still an enemy to whites even though they are victims because they do and carry the same mindset as those terrible Jewish leaders. The results are the same for us whites.

  245. Anon[849] • Disclaimer says:
    @Blodgie

    Suffering is an inevitable part of life. All successful religions philosophies and cultures try to manage it. Not just Christians.

    • Replies: @Anon
    , @Blodgie
  246. chrimony says:
    @Reg Cæsar

    We even gave 18-year-olds the vote.

    Georgia first!

    If they can send you off to die in a war on foreign soil, they can damn well give you the right to vote.

    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar
  247. @TTSSYF

    Certainly true. I was focused on the thought that the “eyes are the windows to the soul”., etc.

    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar
  248. @Bardon Kaldian

    You’re absolutely correct! Jews had nothing to do with the racial and cultural displacement of Whites in Europe and America. Oh sure, it was just a rather insignificant number of Jews who sought to morally destabilize the U.S., and so it’s all a nothing-burger.

    Whites are simply projecting their failures on the most innocent and worthy people of all time – the Jews! The specially elected chosen ones, after all, have little influence on others, hold no sway on social or political matters, and simply lack the funds to influence or manipulate things in their favor. Jews have proven to be more than fair to other racial groups, and the old canard that they succeed by means of ethnic networking is nothing more than anti-Semitic nonsense. Even more nonsensical is the notion that Jews weaponize Blacks and Hispanics against the greater White majority in America and Europe.

    You’re also right about Jewish crackpots being limited to the Barbara Lerner Spectre and Tim Wise types, and perhaps even some of the conspiratorial loonies at the ADL – but other than that there really isn’t any concerted effort on the part of Jews to make sure that all forms of White racial identity becomes a thing of the forgotten past. Whites are just looking for someone to blame. How bizarre that anyone would even think that Jews would attempt such things, right?

    • Replies: @Bardon Kaldian
  249. Anon[419] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anon

    A proper ethic of suffering is necessary for any society culture or civilization to flourish. A respect for the necessity of suffering enables people to sacrifice to build for the future and for the common good. The problem in America is not the Christian ethic of suffering. Rather it is that Christian “leaders” deploy this ethic as a tool to manipulate and patronize the lower classes while they live in the lap of luxury.

    We all know about the televangelists who lived in multimillion-dollar homes with private jet planes who never speak about Fair wages for workers and in fact are controlled by the right-wing billionaire class to oppose labor unions and other reasonable accommodations to workers. These so-called leaders will tell their followers that their suffering is because of their sinfulness and exhort them to give more and more tithe money. Or they will push them off with bland promises about a happy afterlife. It’s no wonder that Christian adherence in America is collapsing.

    Traditionally Catholics have a more mature understanding of suffering than Protestants and Evangelicals. But all too often we see Catholic elites like archbishops who live in the lap of luxury with world-class wine cellars in their homes while the Catholic masses are left to fend for themselves in the jungle-like economic system.

    Of course in China the Communist party elites do live in much greater affluence than the common person. But it seems to me as an outsider observing, that they convey a sense of empathy and solidarity with the common Chinese citizen. Not like our political robber barons in Washington DC, who live with generous housing allowances travel allowances bodyguards and lifetime gold plated health Care coverage. And of course who spend 90% of their time taking legalized bribes from corporate lobbyists and Zionists.

    America is succumbing to the disease that has killed all empires in the past. When the bureaucratic elites become entrenched in their privileges and lose empathy with the people they are supposed to be leading. They consider these people tools to be manipulated rather than people to serve.

  250. ”Specifically Christianity.”

    utter nonsense

    treaty violations
    slavery
    financial mismanagement
    needless war
    assault in family
    same sex conduct
    congressional and executive office graft
    murdering children in the womb
    pollution
    etc.

    . . . there is but one real issue that might have some accountability for careless christian ethos — immigration – the result of sloppy understanding of the meaning of christianity as spiritual universal dynamic

  251. @Mevashir

    You strike me as one of those self-aware and honorable individuals who happens to have come from a Jewish background. So almost axiomatically you become one of Colin Wilson’s “Outsiders”. That 1956 book had deep resonance for me when I read it in 1971. Of late, I’ve delved into his 1957 sequel “Religion and the Rebel”. In that work he does biographical studies of a number of historical figures whom he deems to be on the spirit pathway—though during that era he did not employ that terminology.

    Amerikka, in its present deracinated and spiritually void state, represents the denouement of Kali Yuga writ large. Your plaints closely mirrored my own observations, while carefully and with significant erudition, delineating the status of a population which can best be described as clinically insane, while almost totally in dearth of true leadership.

    One of my axioms is that over the past 50 years or so, rather than the cream rising to the top, that acme has become infested with the scum. Your observations regarding your fellow Harvardites and their accession to the heights of contemporary American reality, surprise me not in the least.

    My reading during the 70’s featured such writers as Rollo May and Herbert Marcuse as well as Carl Jung and the aforementioned Colin Wilson. A couple of years back I encountered and took copious notes on his book on “Synchronicity”. Those exploring the spiritual dimensions have long recognized that lineal, leftbrain, rationalistic materialism is quite literally a dead-end. That is precisely the trap that this culture has fallen into.

    One dimension in which I deeply appreciate Jewish contributions to the whole of humanity is the tendency of a few highly individualized men to have the power of channeling the universal unconscious, as Jung described it. The gift of prophecy is another way of looking at it.

    Long have I been impressed with the mystical propensities of Bob Dylan in his ability to delve deeply into that realm. As a recipient of the Nobel Prize in literature, his early productions, through the onset of the 70’s, stand as almost unarguably the most powerful lyrical poetry in the English language during the 20th Century.

    In his masterpiece, “Desolation Row” from his “Highway 61 Revisited” album, released in 1965, Dylan, consciously or subconsciously or most probably superconsciously, takes on his primary rivals: …”Ezra Pound and T.S. Eliot sitting in the captain’s tower, while calypso singers laugh at them and fishermen hold flowers.”

    The spearhead of our current struggle is the elementary battle between the spiritual quest and the contemporary easy way out, rationalistic materialism and its toxic fallout. Your dropping out of the rat-race and the possibility–nay probability–of recognized economic primacy in adoration of the “Bitch Goddess Success”; resonates mightily with the twisting, bending, narrow pathway which has been the course of my life since the early 60’s.

    Like Robert Zimmerman, who likely experienced his Bris in the immediate neighborhood of Highway 61 in his hometown of Duluth, Minnesota; your soul is of Jewish inheritance, while your spirit is universal and perhaps even cosmic.

    • Replies: @Mevashir
  252. Corvinus says:
    @Fart Blossom

    “Where did you get that? Sounds backwards to me.“

    Nope. It’s what happened. Actual history confirms it. Not your warped version.

    “Citation please! Or do you think you’re being funny“

    https://www.nationalww2museum.org/war/articles/great-debate

    https://history.state.gov/milestones/1937-1945/lend-lease

    “You mean liberating them from the radical Reds.”

    No, half of Poland went to the USSR and half went to Nazi Germany. Poland was free and a white Christian Nation to boot. Why do you support the murdering of white people who simply wanted to live their own way of life according to the principles of Jesus Christ?

    • LOL: Fart Blossom
  253. @Corvinus

    “Rather, I am a white person, like millions of other white people, who see everything clearly, and it bothers you to your core, that we have made our own decisions” – No, it doesn’t bother me to the core in the least. I deal with people all the time who have differing positions, and who vigorously disagree with my views. It seems to me that you are projecting your own feelings. You must feel proud of yourself that you “see everything clearly.”

    I’ve noticed that in your replies, you don’t really refute my objections. You ask questions which you yourself know the answers to (or at least think you do). Many of them are childish. This is intended to waste your opponent’s time, but in the end it’s not really a matter of inquiry for you. Besides, you would never agree with any of the answers because your mind is already made up. I noticed that in your replies to Hitler’s invasion of Poland during WW2 that your knowledge of that period is skewed and simplistic. I could have responded and even referenced historical works that would have answered your objections, but it would do little good. I sense that you read only the sources that support your preconceived notions about that period.

    I have generally found that those who object to the JQ or any form of Jewish criticism are reactionary in nature. Many, though not all, are either Jews or sympathetic to them. This is because most Whites have been conditioned after many decades to see Jews as the weak and victimized who are persecuted through no fault of their own. I used to be in your shoes many years ago. I would argue with critics of the Jews and I had my own set of replies ready at a moment’s notice to refute my opponents. But I had read only one side of the issue at the time.

    But a host of issues and questions kept coming up, and I felt compelled to investigate them further. After a period of about seven years and reading BOTH sides of the JQ, I was persuaded that those critics had quite a convincing case. Further research has only confirmed it. I hope you will do the same in spite of your claim that you are “quite familiar” with such critical books.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
    , @Fart Blossom
  254. @Priss Factor

    Tour de Force. We do disagree on some factors you espouse, but essentially it is obvious that you put your heart and soul into this one. Another French term which describes your production is “Cri de Coeur”. Thank you for sharing your perspectives and concern.

    • Replies: @Mevashir
  255. Mevashir says:
    @Emerging Majority

    Thank you for your very kind words. I don’t take much credit for my open-mindedness. It seems that all my life I have been forced into gaining a broader perspective and higher consciousness than I really desired.

    I met some South African Christian missionaries in Israel after I had been living in the ultra-orthodox Jewish community for 18 years. These people inspired me also with their broader consciousness and greater humanitarianism. I had tired of the narrow ghetto mindedness of Orthodox Judaism and also of Israeli society with its perpetual state of hostility not only to Arabs but to different groups within Israel itself. My experiences after being baptised of being ostracized by my Israeli family and friends forced me onto a very lonely path.

    Since returning to the States in 2006 I have worshipped with every kind of Christian denomination. I see things that appeal to me and don’t appeal to me in every group. Pluses and minuses as they say. But my general observation is almost all American Christians are blind to the kinds of truths and issues that are discussed on this website. And therefore I no longer associate with any of them because it’s simply too depressing and discouraging to be involved with unenlightened people.

    So all of these experiences forced me onto an extremely lonely and isolated path. I respect truth and virtue wherever I see it regardless of race or religion. I was raised as a child in California so I have an innate tendency to admire Asian culture which was so prevalent back in those days. My Australian friend thinks that I am blindly biased in favor of the Chinese, but with very few exceptions all the Chinese people I have ever met in my life are honorable and virtuous people, hardworking, dignified, with a lot of self respect.

    [MORE]

    It also seems to me that the Chinese are much more adept at doing global business than Americans. They make business deals across the world with every race religion and culture. They don’t seem to ever try to impose their domestic political or cultural values on the countries they are doing business with. This is completely different from America, which seems to arrogantly impose its own cultural expectations across the globe. Americans are peculiarly obsessed with their notion of uniqueness. I guess this makes Americans the ultimate Jews of the gentile world, considering themselves specially chosen to impose their values on the rest of the world. We’ve seen that the more America tries to impose those values on the wider world the more the values back at home collapse.

    Often church leaders I met would claim that every American tragedy is because we don’t support Israel faithfully enough. In my view, having lived in both countries for many years, it seems to me no country in history has been as generous and supportive of Jews as America. Yet I think if we’re honest we have to admit that the more America gives and grovels the Israel, the more our own domestic society back home collapses into chaos.

    I also think if you’re honest and closely examine the full course of Jewish history, any country that becomes friendly and generous to the Jews ends up collapsing and being destroyed from within. It’s notable that right after the famous book of Esther story in the Old Testament, the Persian empire was defeated by the Greeks and began a rapid decline. I suspect if you trace the pattern carefully you will find that societies that ingratiate themselves to Jews, as America has done, end up losing their sense of identity their moral foundation and soon enough collapse. The Jews are like locusts coming in despoiling all the crops leaving the country ruined and flying off to a new venue to exercise their predatory behavior upon.

    I am a Jew but also an American and I mourn the destructive selfish greedy arrogant behavior of other Jews in our country. I don’t believe it can possibly end well. I also believe that if a violent anti-Jewish backlash takes place, people like me will end up being targeted because we are defenseless with few resources no weapons or ammunition and easy to eliminate. It’s my impression that most of Hitler’s Jewish victims in world war II fell into this class. However I’m also honest enough to admit that this kind of over-generalized American anger and backlash against Jews is completely understandable and I will not hold it against them.

  256. @Antiochus

    Thank you, Antiochus, for your insightful and plangent formulation. Lately, my perusals on this site have gravitated more and more to those presentations which strike me as likely to be thought-provoking. The dialectic between freedom and form, or the Yin and Yang as you so clearly present it, had been somewhat of a grey area for me over the decades. Your observations on Plato induce considerations of Plato’s Cave. Deluded, deracinated and detached from the nourishing world of a nature-infused environment; sub-urban Americans are probably the most out of it habitants of this ruptured republic.

    A line in Dylan’s “The Times they are a Changin”…”for the wheel’s still in spin” suggests to me that perhaps “it ain’t over now, Baby Blue”. Absolutely true that every successful society needs for a ruling and unifying mythology. Nietzsche mourned that “God is Dead”, as you clearly pointed out. “But the Emperor has no clothes” remonstrated Hans Christian Andersen.

    The Santee Dakota activist, John Trudell, spoke for the perspectives of his native people of Turtle Island. Though he did not posit a direct declamation that the mythological formulation which immigrants to this continent brought with them from Europe, was as I have long decried it, the “JudieChristie Magick Mindfuck; Trudell bemoaned the fact that the European peoples who had long been subject to Constantine’s historical double-cross of slavery to both the State and the Church; were thereby sundered away from their tribal roots. They had become slaves to the system of kingship and feudalism along with being made illiterate by dictates of “Holy Mother Church”.

    Years ago, I wrote a short chapter in an unfinished (because in many ways, sophomoric) manuscript which was titled “The Million Tribes of Turtle Island”. What I had envisioned was the positive vision of a take on the possible impetus of the Mayan people abandoning their cities and repairing to a culture deeply connected to the natural rhythms of living in closeness to the world of nature–in other words to become grounded in meaningful communities, while retaining understandings (such as they are) of cosmic connectivity.

    Plato noted that Socrates had demonstrated that the largest possible size for a city to grow, while maintaining civic harmony, was approximately a maximum population of 30,000. The only hope for America, as I see it, is to become re-naturalized. Traditional Native Americans have not lost sight of their visions. Some of us veterans of the Hippie rebellion share in those insights. Alluding to one of the inner messages by a band which performed at Woodstock in August of ’69…”Back to the Garden”.

    Megalopolitan urban and most particularly, those good jobs for high-achievers who exist in sub-urban anti-communities, have got things precisely bass-ackwards. They grabbed for the Big Brass Ring and it has them engirded by the short hairs.

  257. Corvinus says:
    @RockaBoatus

    “I’ve noticed that in your replies, you don’t really refute my objections.”

    To the contrary, I’ve thoroughly denounced them.

    “You ask questions which you yourself know the answers to (or at least think you do). Many of them are childish.”

    No, they are absolutely important, and I get why you avoid responding to them.

    “Besides, you would never agree with any of the answers because your mind is already made up. “

    What answers?

    “I noticed that in your replies to Hitler’s invasion of Poland during WW2 that your knowledge of that period is skewed and simplistic.”

    I notice you didn’t object to the fact that Polish white Catholics were murdered by Nazis, and that a free people were caught between two forces of evil. That’s a start.

    “I sense that you read only the sources that support your preconceived notions about that period.”

    Project much?

    “I have generally found that those who object to the JQ or any form of Jewish criticism are reactionary in nature.”

    Now I would agree here. It is a reaction to their confirmation bias.

    For example, there are countless eyewitness accounts by Jews, non Jews, and Germans about the Nazi labor and work camps and what exactly went on, especially the brutal treatment of women and children. Do you refute it yourself? Why? How can all or even most of their testimony be essentially a gross exaggeration, or was coerced fabrication?

    “This is because most Whites have been conditioned”

    No, millions of whites of their own design and volition have chosen to live a life that you personally find disturbing. We have seen all sides, heard all positions, sifted through the historical record, investigated everything carefully—and it is one that you just can’t come to realistic grips with. It is illogical to think that bright whites have repeatedly been duped by Jews for decades without ever catching on to their machinations,

    Ultimately, you are proposing any and all whites be in complete lockstep with you. Otherwise, they are shamed into thinking they are race traitors. Yet, it is clear you are engaging in the same tactics that you supposedly deplore that Joos use—brainwashing.

    • Replies: @Boomthorkell
  258. @Mevashir

    Mevashir: Your prompt and heartfelt and highly introspective response is most appreciated. You might want to consider the historical reality that the Puritans who arrived at Plymouth Rock in 1620, were not so much refugees from religious persecution in England as we have been led to believe. Rather, they were staunch Calvinists and absolute Old Testicles literalists.

    Depth students of cultural history have come to realize that in essence these so-called “Pilgrims” came to Turtle Island because they found themselves unable to impose their Calvinistic strictures (and Scriptures) upon their European neighbors. So one tentacle of the New World Order (called by some on this site “The Jew World Order”) was this Calvinistic branch of witch burning believers who were impelled and indeed, compelled by their beliefs, to impose their will upon this new land.

    Though I have yet to research the possible truth of the assertion, at least one site I explored over the net declared that “Calvin”, was a Marrano by heritage and perhaps a Crypto like John D. Rockefeller, son of David Aaronovitch Rockefeller, or like the Skull n’ Bonesman, John Kerry, who’s family name was originally Kohn.

    If this was indeed the case, it requires little consideration to come to the conclusion that the deep and dire devotion of the Puritans of New England to the Old Testicles was the logical product of the Predestination tenets of Calvin. This observation can be evidenced by the plethora of first-names for their offspring which almost inevitably originated in the O.T.

    So Yankee exceptionalism, their adopted “chosenness”, has a taproot directly into the Biblical mythology of “God’s Chosen People”.

    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar
    , @Anon
  259. karel says:
    @White Elephant

    Yes, I have also heard of scotch whisky. This strange product came to my attention about three months ago, but Scotch is also a legitimate description of the tribes north of Lancaster. You will be probably surprised by what the ” free dictionary” says. See below.

    http://www.thefreedictionary.com › scotch
    Scotch – of or relating to or characteristic of Scotland or its people or culture or its English dialect or Gaelic language; “Scots Gaelic”; “the Scots community in New York”; “`Scottish’ tends to be the more formal term as in `The Scottish Symphony’ or `Scottish authors’ or `Scottish mountains’”; “`Scotch’ is in disfavor with Scottish people and is used primarily outside Scotland except in such frozen phrases as `Scotch broth’ or `Scotch whiskey’ or `Scotch plaid

    Anyway, we still have a remnant of free speech and I can call these redheads with swinging sporrans by whatever names I choose. I only hope that there are not too many communists among them.

    • Replies: @White Elephant
  260. @chrimony

    If they can send you off to die in a war on foreign soil, they can damn well give you the right to vote.

    Indeed, that was the argument that carried the day– in 1943. What’s odd is not that it was Georgia, but it was only Georgia. Kentucky followed suit in 1955, and Alaska and Hawaii came in with ages of 19 and 20, respectively. But no other states did until on the cusp of the 26th Amendment 50 years ago this July.

    The governor at the time joked that Georgia was usually the last in line to reform, but this time they could brag they were the first.

  261. @Dr. Charles Fhandrich

    Certainly true. I was focused on the thought that the “eyes are the windows to the soul”., etc.

    The Overton window?

  262. @Emerging Majority

    this Calvinistic branch of witch burning believers

    Witches were hanged, not burned.

    New England was more civilized than the Old World on this matter. Only two were ever drawn and quartered, King Philip and accused traitor Joshua Tefft– and after they were hanged.

    Their body parts were hung [sic] in the village squares, but that was done in England as well.

    Those goofy sentence-long Puritan given names we laugh at were another thing seen only in England. New Englanders gave their children names (e.g. Hope, Faith, Felicity, Patience, Constance) which seem bizarre and alien to us today, but were rather tame back then.

  263. Didn’t Montaigne make apology for the cannibals? It’s the same people, repeating the same nonsense, for century after century. Even on this thread we have people condemning Columbus because his exploration was for Catholic Spain.

  264. karel says:
    @Fart Blossom

    Ok, but what do you want from me, compensation for your sorrows? Look at this

    https://www.novarepublika.cz/2021/12/utok-ordneru-na-moravskou-chrastovou-a-politika-budouci-ceske-vlady-vuci-sudetskym-nemcum

    perhaps you may recognize in the photo some of your ancestors who suffered such a terrible fate after 1945.

  265. karel says:
    @Fart Blossom

    Ok, but what do you want from me, compensation for your sorrows? Look at this

    https://www.novarepublika.cz/2021/12/utok-ordneru-na-moravskou-chrastovou-a-politika-budouci-ceske-vlady-vuci-sudetskym-nemcum

    perhaps you may recognize in the photo some of your criminal ancestors who have suffered such a terrible fate after 1945.

  266. @RockaBoatus

    Cognitive dissonance.

    The crucial mistake virtually all conspiracy- theories minded people make is that they try to pin-point a clearly defined group (mostly religious, ethnic, racial,..) as the source of major socio-cultural changes, and frequently it’s Jews (sometimes masons or something similar).

    And this is a major misfire, because no such group exists. There is no causal connection between any ethnicity/race/… & great upheavals in the West (and in the US) in past 3-4 decades, especially re immigration debates, influx of culturally & racially foreign and inimical masses, disintegration of family & denigration of national loyalties etc. To think that a group (or groups), which is relatively easy to identify, can be the source of such monumental upheavals bespeaks of historical illiteracy.

    There was no ethnic nor ideological group of people behind such shattering revolutions & world-view changes like transition from Roman republic to Imperial Rome, Protestant Reformation, Crusades, formation of national monarchies, Enlightenment, collapse of “divine rights” of kings, imperialist expansion of European powers, national awakening in the 19th C, WW1 and WW2,… Not Jews, not masons, not Illuminati, not Rosicrucians, not some occult brotherhood residing in the Himalayas.

    Simply, Western civilization has come to a dead end -as it was the continuity of the 18th C Enlightenment- and we are witnessing the processes of further decay, encapsulated in famous hypothetical question ascribed to Lenin: ” Perhaps the forces which propel us to greatness are the same that will, transformed by mutations of History, eventually lead to our collapse ?”

    A man who, despite his shortcomings & delusions about the role of technology, various national cultures and their dominant currents, understood this better than most was Oswald Spengler. The Western civilizational matrix is old and tired. And this is the root of the Western decline. That what plagues the West & the US the most (race replacement, PC “liberal” ideological muzzle, hedonist emptiness & biological collapse manifested in infertility, pathological altruism, lunatic ideological fashions like n-th wave of feminism, media aggression promoting “diversity” & homosexualism- as different from homosexuality, self-hatred of European & Western culture….)-this is as present, although a bit modified, in Italy, Spain, Denmark, Norway, France, Germany, Switzerland,.. as in the US. And in these countries Jewish presence in the media & the overall life is negligible or non-existent.

    Although ruling elites differ in these countries, they are a mixture of hereditary aristocracy, established bourgeois families & plutocratic oligarchs. These groups have, historically, served their countries. Now, they are morally & culturally bankrupt and serve outmoded gods whose future is annihilation- similar situation that had befallen pompous & deluded aristocrats in the 18th-19th C or imperialist jingoists in the 20th.

    The failure of nerves that comes with the exhausted & geriatric social-cultural matrix is to blame, not some group conspiracy.

    But, the societal-cultural matrix is exhausted, not the people. Our flaw is linear extrapolation of current events which leads to paralyzing pessimist fatalism. We should know from history this is a fatal mistake. Just compare Europe in 1930 (cars, planes, fascism, communism, cubism, quantum mechanics, relativity, psychoanalysis, radio, tanks, films, ..) and during 1900 (technologically, scientifically, ideologically and artistically more or less the same as 1880).

    So, we should not give up hope, and some of us who are obsessed with Jews, should give up this tired old chestnut. If all of US Jewish ethno-nationalists were booted to Israel, life would be somewhat easier for Euro-Americans in some respects, but not essentially different. Blacks would remain blacks, PC muzzle would remain PC muzzle, dopeheads would remain dopeheads, Pentagon would remain Pentagon, …

    • Replies: @geokat62
    , @RockaBoatus
  267. I guess not. All those brainy people on the Left, all those millionaires in Silicon Valley — not even they can figure out how to explain why we’re wrong. Why can’t they? Because we’re right. And so, we have to be smothered.

    Proper terminology is of the essence. Indeed, many dissidents on our side have long argued that the Enemy willfully, stupidly, or just dishonestly uses false labels to smear the opposition. So, whites opting out of the globalist program are smeared as ‘white supremacists’. Nowadays, if you mock Seth Rogan and Sarah Silverman’s X-mas offal, you’re a ‘white supremacist’. Parents who criticize CRT are ‘white supremacists’. Those who demand more investigation into the 2020 election are ‘white supremacists’. Whites who are okay being white are ‘white supremacists’. Dissidents on our side are rightfully angry that they are smeared with false terminology and slanderous labels. It’s like brand-hoaxing, but then, we live in a world where trannies are labeled as ‘women’ as if gender-confused maladies are a badge of pride.

    If the great lie of the Jewish globalist cabal is to smear anything pro-white as ‘white supremacist’, the great lie of White Advocates & Dissident Rightists(and conservatives in general) is to use the ‘left’ label on their persecutors. The Jewish-led Cabal is no more ‘leftist’ than pro-white groups are ‘white supremacist’. (There is a small faction of genuine white supremacists but half of them happen to be recalcitrant neo-nazi and the other half are Feds.) Both sides dare not name it as it really is. Jewish Power(that is behind all this ‘woke’ garbage) and the Right spectrum are both incapable of seeing it like it is or saying it like it is.

    It’s far worse for the Right because, whereas the Jewish Lie is to pinpoint and vastly exaggerate the White Politics of the Right, the White Lie(that employs the ‘leftist’ label as all-inclusive epithet) is to give cover to the identity of their main enemy. Imagine Bob and Billy are at loggerheads. Bob goes out of his way to name BILLY as the baddie and says “BAD BILLY is an a**hole”, “BAD BILLY is a shi*head”, “BAD BILLY is a psycho”, and etc. Bob calls Billy “Bad Billy” and associates Billy with all that is bad.
    But, what does Billy do? Instead of calling out on Bob, let alone Bad Bob, he blames all of Bob’s nastiness on “Mr. Negativity”. So, Bob is never mentioned by name. All his nasty antics isn’t associated with his personage. Rather, they’re blamed on some vague generality called “Mr. Negativity”. Anyone listening to this debate would think, “Maybe Billy really is Bad Billy and responsible for all those awful things. And, if Billy is right, Negativity must be to blame for the other problems.” In this war of words, Billy is named but Bob isn’t. No matter how often Bob associates Billy with Bad Stuff, Billy never names Bob and blames Bob’s bad stuff on some vague ‘negativity’. Guess who’s going to win?

    Even though both the ‘white supremacist’ and ‘leftist’ labels are misleading or downright falsehoods, the key difference is, whereas pro-white people feel the sting of being called ‘white supremacist’, Jews and globalist elite cucks love being called the ‘left’. It is precisely what they want. Imagine having all the power, privilege, connections, and advantages but being associated with radical egalitarianism. ROTFL. Imagine being George Soros and being called a ‘leftist’. Imagine being Michael Bloomberg or the Google Billionaires or some Zionist Jewish tycoon and being called a ‘leftist’ because one supports the smoke-and-mirrors false ‘leftism’ of gender-pronoun nuttery that is really the product of capitalist decadence and globo-homo neo-aristocratism.

    While Jewish Power isn’t only naming but DEFAMING whiteness by associating anything pro-white or race-neutral as ‘white supremacist’, those on the Right Spectrum dare not name the real power behind the anti-white lunacy(either due to craven fear of Jewish Power or the internalization of the notion that ANY anti-Jewish criticism is tantamount to naziesque ‘antisemitism’). According to Jewish-controlled ‘wokeness’, even ‘progressive’ whites are ‘white supremacist’. Now, this much reviled ‘whiteness’ really applies to Northern European(and pale-faced)whiteness, not to Latin whiteness. You’d think given the Latin/Hispanic lead in the conquest of the New World, the slave trade, and various ‘genocides’, Latin-American whites would especially get it in the neck from ‘wokeness’, but they’re relatively spared because they are useful allies against ‘gringos’, the real prize white horse on which Jewish Power sits astride. After all, if Jews had moved only to Latin America, would they be masters of the world? No, Jewish supremacism needed to harness the ability and competence of Anglo-Germanic whiteness.

    ‘Wokery’ says all (pale)whites are ‘white supremacist’, but the dividing line is between those who profess their sins vs those who refuse to repent. In other words, it shares the same moral-spiritual dynamics of Christianity that says ALL humans are sinners and must rely on Jesus for salvation. Thus, Christianity isn’t about the sinless vs the sinful but about the repentant sinful vs the unrepentant sinful. The repentant sinful feel more virtuous because they confess their sins and admit to the wickedness within their hearts, and this fills them with righteous fury toward those who reject the notion of sin and refuse to self-flagellate themselves. ‘Wokristianity’ says all whites are stained with the sin of ‘white supremacism’ because of history(though some even claim it’s ingrained in lame whitebread genetics, thereby the only way out is through ACOWW or Afro-Colonization of White Wombs that makes white women give birth to sacred black babies, a kind of baptism of the white body with black semen, which seems to be the point of madonna’s “Like a Prayer” video). ‘Wokery’ insists that even the most proggy do-goody whites are ‘white supremacist’ either subconsciously or by habit, legacy, or social privileges. Thus, it’s not a matter of ‘white supremacism’ vs ‘white egalitarianism’ but between repentant ‘white supremacists’ who tirelessly purge their wicked hearts of this white ‘sin’ and ‘white supremacists’ who either revel in their supremacy or deny that they are supremacist even though they’re beneficiaries of ‘systemic racism’. This is why ‘woke’ whites are especially nutty. It’s not just a case of tribalism of us-vs-them but the righteous pride of spiritual atonement. What made Christian piety so insufferable is also what makes ‘wokeness’ so hard to stomach. It’s about people claiming, “I’m so much better than you because I atone and admit how totally shitty I am.” Self-abasement as stepping stone to self-aggrandizement.

    [MORE]

    Of course, this nuttery is appealing to white progs because it’s just pseudo-sophisticated enough to catch their fancy — ooh, ‘subconsciously racist’, that’s some psychologically intellectual stuff — and comes with a kernel of truth, i.e. society doesn’t suddenly change into what it professes to be but lingers(even for a long spell) with traces of the past, e.g. Modern India ideologically did away with the caste system, but the legacy lingers; China did away with Confucianism, but its cultural shadow still looms large; Japan hasn’t been a samurai society for over a century and half, but certain samuraish ways still remain.
    But, the same could be said of Jews and blacks. Modern Jews claim to be mostly liberal and cosmopolitan, but their behavior continued to be guided by ancient tribalism. Blacks claim to be part of the modern world but are still driven by jungle-jive genetics.

    The comprehensive use of ‘white supremacist’ to describe American History(and the West in general) is misleading. US was white-dominant than white-supremacist. It was founded by whites, and naturally whites created a new order in their image and on their heritage. (In a way, it was more Anglo-dominant as non-Anglo white immigrants were pressured to assimilate to Anglo-American norms. It’s certainly the reason we all speak English.) But, if America had been founded and settled from the Pacific by the Japanese, it would have been Japanese/Asian dominant. Every civilization has a dominant force, power, presence, rule. Arab World was Arab-dominant, and Muslim World was Muslim-dominant. Slavic World was Slavic Dominant, just like Turkey was Turkic-dominant. A kind of dominance remains in force even under foreign occupation; such sub-dominance later becomes the basis for national liberation. Even under Roman rule, Jewish communities within Judea were Jewish-dominant. Even under British rule, India was demographically and culturally Hindu-dominant. Even under Russian-Germanic imperial rule, Polish society was Polish-dominant, and this Polish sub-dominance later re-emerged as rallying cry for national autonomy.

    It’s like, even under Jewish Rule over America, many white Christian communities remain white/Christian dominant. This fact appears to enrage Jews who want to substitute whiteness with total cuckery and Christianity with globo-homo-BLM ‘wokeness’. The difference between ‘supremacist’ and ‘dominant’ is the former tends to have no sense of limits and seeks hegemony over others. When Adolf Hitler was focused on German revival, he was for German Dominance. When he invaded Poland and later Russia, it was a case of German Supremacism. Most white Americans today have no use for world conquest or control — the US, a huge country with the best land in the world, is enough for them. European patriots want to keep their own nations, worlds of their own. They don’t want to conquer Africa, Asia, or the Middle East. Notwithstanding neo-imperialist morons like Richard Spencer(who thinks he’s 007 in Darth Vader helmet), most white American patriots had enough of overseas wars and want the military to guard US borders.

    If any group is in supremacist mode in the US, it’s the Jews, homos, military-industrial complex, and the cuck-dogs of Zion(like John Bolton and so many others). It’s amusing indeed that the most supremacist and aggressive forces in America accuse white patriots of ‘white supremacism’. In other words, those who prefer peace and national security are ‘white supremacist’ while those who call for hegemony and more tensions with the rest of the world are for ‘liberal democracy’ and ‘equity’. What a joke to be ‘woke’.
    Essentially, ‘wokeness’ is a Jewish psycho-moral weapon to guilt-bait whites into paralysis and submission, which is then used to manipulate whites into serving Jewish Power. The mental programming goes like this, “I’m a white person stained with the sin of ‘racism’ and ‘supremacism’. Thus, I deserve no agency and autonomy and must look to the sacred races for guidance. I must wash black feet and obey Jews, the Holy Holocaust people, and maybe just then, I’ll earn an ounce of redemption points.”
    Even though conzos reject ‘wokeness’, they have their own variation which operates much the same way. After all, what is the GOP platform based on but “We are the good guys because we cuck to Israel more”? But, why would the Party of White Christian Conservatives need to cuck to Jews and Israel? It can only be explained in terms of “We white Christians are morally deficient, therefore we need the approval of Holy Holocaust Jews to attain real moral worth.” So, any Zio-Cuck conzo should look in the mirror before he or she lambastes the inner dynamics of ‘wokeness’.

    The knee-jerk tendency of designating the Enemy as the ‘left’ has made it harder to drive a wedge between the globalist/cabalist elites and the masses of whites into the politics of justice. Granted, there are some genuine leftist types who call foul on globalism, corporatism, deep-statism, and the like. But as long as they’re lumped in with the billionaire oligarchs, Zionist-globalists, and the power elites, there will be far less inclination on their part to see the light and resist the real power.
    Indeed, even though Jewish Supremacists sometimes blame the ‘right’, they are far less likely to go on and on about ‘the right, the right, the right’ because they’re focused on driving a wedge between elements within the Right Spectrum. By focusing on ‘white supremacism’, they seek to cause a rift between ‘decent conservatives’ and ‘those racists’. So, even as the Democratic Party is broadly ‘anti-right’, it offers an olive branch to ‘decent’ elements of conservatism, and this is what National Review runs on: “We are the good decent principled conservatives who cuck half the time, unlike those ‘racists’.”
    In contrast, by constantly attacking the LEFT, the Right Spectrum only ends up strengthening the bonds between Jewish oligarchs/Big Capital and the white masses into Resistance Politics.

    What we really need to do is drive a wedge between the elites and the leftist masses and then build a bridge between white populists and white socialists. Socialism isn’t to be confused with communism, which is dead and has no chance. Socialism is necessary because the current system is a rigged game. The government is no longer interested in going after monopolies. ‘Free trade’ undermined unions. The Covid regimen showed how the Power can push a few buttons and destroy countless middle class businesses while fattening the wallets of the already-super-rich. Any notion of free and fair competition under such a system is a pipe dream. Now, the socialism I have in mind isn’t anything like communism and accepts the role of capitalism. But it also understands that capitalism leads to monopolies, concentrations of power, and corporate collusion between big capital and big state(something totally overlooked by libertarians who seem to idealize capitalists as principled individualists when many of them are unscrupulous tribalists or gangstoids). The socialism I have in mind uses political tools to combat the worst abuses of capitalism and its cancerous coordination with elite power centers.

    Also, this socialism isn’t to be confused with statism(with is really status-ism via collusion of state and capital). True socialism is about use of power to favor the people, the powerless, and the under-represented. In contrast, statism is about careerism via government jobs or state funded programs. While socialism always needs to use the power of the state, statism is far less concerned with the interests of the people than for the individuals who procure roles for themselves in government or by NGO funding. Though statists often claim to be working for ‘social justice’ or the People, they are only in it for themselves. They are looking for sinecures and the like. The proof is in the pudding. Notice how so many urban educated ‘woke’ types and blacks claim to be ‘socialist’ but all they care about is obtaining some statist job or gaining funding so they can sustain status and lifestyle on par with the professional class. When have these ‘woke’ statist types ever spoken up for the workers, the underclass, and the like? No, it’s mostly about globo-homo or tranny nuttery. Or pie-in-the-sky schemes related to global warming, which means all they have to do is produce more paperwork and ‘studies’ without doing anything concrete or real. Or, it’s about More Immigrants so that Big Business can have cheaper hirelings. Or, it’s about the mindless adulation of blackness as a kind of racial fetish when anyone really interested in black well-being would call for less immigration(thus raising wages for blacks) and more police protection(that not only shields whites from blacks but suppresses black-on-black violence).

    The future must be neo-fascist or social-nationalist. It has to be about the union of rightism and leftism as both have much value to offer. So, stop dumping on the ‘left’ and focus on the supremacist manipulators of globalism, capitalism, and statism. At the top, it’s Jewish Power. Speak up for Palestinians because what Zionists did to Palestinians was dress rehearsal for what is being done to the West. Do everything to make the people, ‘right’ or ‘left’, more aware of who really rules the West. Point out that the core tenets of Globalism are really fueled by ultra-right Zionist Supremacism, not by Leftism. For proof, look how Jewish Power has totally suppressed BDS and pro-Palestinian voices within the supposedly ‘leftist’ Democratic Party. Point out to the progs of their misguidedness in opposing ‘white supremacism'(when whites only want liberation from Jewish supremacism) while, in effect, doing the bidding of Jewish Supremacists who are the main drivers of wars and imperialism around the world. Indeed, what better way to save the world than via White Liberation from Jewish Supremacism. Once whites say NO to Jewish Power, Zio-Globalism will no longer have a white war horse to ride on to trample around the globe.

    Among many on the Right Spectrum, there’s the image of the Democratic Party being driven to the Far Left. Nothing can be further from the truth. The problem is the Democratic Party is totally beholden to the Imperial Center. Biden’s regime is filled with Jewish Supremacists and totally in cahoots with Big Capital. It sees eye-to-eye with Zion. It is favored by the Military Industrial Complex that revs the engine for wars with Russia, China, and/or Iran. Sure, there’s massive border crisis and tranny-gender nuttery, but both are favored by Jewish Supremacist-capitalists. The True Left didn’t come up with globo-homo, even though plenty of leftists foolishly signed on in deference to Jewish Power(but then so did plenty of conzos). If the Democratic Party were truly controlled by the Far Left, things would actually be far better. The War Industry would be called out. Wall Street would be denounced. Big Pharma would be condemned. Homos would be criticized for working in the deep state to spread wars and terror. Blacks would be called on to favor universal justice over racial idolatry. There would be calls to treat Jews and Palestinians equally. But where do you see that in the Democratic Party? In truth, the agenda is purely Imperial Centrist, aka Jewish-capitalist-supremacist.

    • Replies: @Anon
  268. geokat62 says:
    @Bardon Kaldian

    So, we should not give up hope, and some of us who are obsessed with Jews, should give up this tired old chestnut.

    Shorter BK: just give up, goy. Your great Western civilisation was bound to come to an end. Jews had nothing to do with this. So. just sit back and turn on the Talmudvision and go back to sleep. We promise to wake you up when it’s time to embrace your Talmudic role as Noahide slaves.

    Baruch HaShem!

    • LOL: Pat Kittle
  269. karel says:
    @Mulegino1

    Thanks for parroting Collona, but parroting is not an answer to my question. Perhaps, you may have heard of ”the prison of nations” devised by Austria-Hungary.

    • Replies: @Mulegino1
  270. Anon[406] • Disclaimer says:
    @Emerging Majority

    Most fascinating. Thank you. Yes I was aware of the hypocrisy of the Calvinist Puritans who were not seeking freedom from oppression as much as freedom to oppress others, as they did to many in the New World.

    It seems that two distinct societies were formed at the same time in North America. One were the Calvinists in New England and the second were the plantation English in Virginia and extending further south. I think the true model of America is the plantation system, whereby the wealthy owner is venerated and practically worshipped while all of his workers are deemed to be ngger slaves without dignity or rights. I think ultimately both societies emerged, so the New England Calvinists became the high priests for the plantation industrialists. I think to this day America resembles a vast plantation. Note the forced veneration of rich people celebrities sports stars and CEOs. Just like the plantation owner sipping mint juleps on the veranda so long ago. Note America’s consistent hostility to labor stretching back to its earliest days up until the present. Note the constant influx of third world immigrants who can be employed at substandard wages and without benefits, undermining the efforts of more established Americans to obtain decent working conditions.

    I read somewhere that the original Rockefeller surname was Rauchenfelder. Have you seen that? Who is this David Aaronovitz?

    I also read somewhere that John Calvin’s real surname was Chauvin, just like the George Floyd police officer, perhaps a corruption of Cohen?

    Pardon my ignorance, but what is Turtle Island? A few years ago I read the book BURY MY HEART AT WOUNDED KNEE, which shattered me with the extent of Indian suffering in the American West. I live in Colorado in an area that reputedly ran many Indian tribes out of here. I’ve been to the Black hills and saw Mount Rushmore. I think Mount Rushmore is absolutely aesthetically grotesque even on its own terms, to say nothing of the enormous insult to the Indian tribes of engraving the faces of presidents who were most responsible for genocidal policies against the Native Americans right in the heart of their sacred Black Hill territory. It would be like putting a statue of Adolf Hitler next to the Western Wall in Jerusalem! (In truth, Hitler was so instrumental to the furthering of the Zionist cause that I have proposed that his statue or portrait be hung in the Knesset building!)

    I saw a broadcast of the Native American day of mourning ceremony ceremony at Plymouth Rock on Thanksgiving Day. For many years I have felt a dreadful sense of depression and numbness on Thanksgiving, and seeing this broadcast made me understand that perhaps there is terrible negative karma associated with this day.

    • Replies: @Emerging Majority
  271. @RockaBoatus

    As they say, it’s like bathing swine only to have them return to the muck.

  272. @Mevashir

    It’s my impression that most of Hitler’s Jewish victims in world war II fell into this class.

    Here you go…

    Dr. Kastein’s presentation is typical: he says the Inquisition persecuted
    “heretics and peoples of alien creeds” and then adds, “that is to say, principally
    Jews”, and from that point on he conveys the impression of a solely Jewish
    persecution. (In the same way, in our century, Hitler’s persecution was through
    four stages of propagandist misrepresentation transformed from one of
    “political opponents” into one of “political opponents and Jews”, then of “Jews
    and political opponents”, and last, “of Jews”).

    Meanwhile, the uproar about Hitler grew and, as I have shown, his
    persecution of men was subtly transformed into a “persecution of Jews”.

    -Douglas Reed, “the Controversy of Zion,” p 318-9 (written ~1955 but unable to be published until 1978) https://archive.org/stream/TheControversyOfZion/TheControversyOfZion_djvu.txt

    Always remember this, please.:

    “… this entire myth, so prevalent then and even now about Hitler, and about the Japanese, is a tissue of fallacies from beginning to end. Every plank in this nightmare evidence is either completely untrue or not entirely the truth.
    If people should learn this intellectual fraud about Hitler’s Germany, then they will begin to ask questions, and searching questions…”

    Murray Rothbard, Revisionism for Our Time
    Mr. Rothbard was an American Jew and an historian of the very highest caliber.
    http://mises.org/daily/2592

    Most of what we’ve been told about the wars of the 20th century is recycled Zionist-Bolshevik wartime propaganda. Get the book; you’ll be glad you did.

    • Replies: @Anon
  273. @karel

    Erm…

    No.
    Scotch IS NOT a legitimate definition for the Scottish nation. Just because it’s in a dictionary does not mean it’s legitimate, considering that most definitions, in modern dictionaries, these days, are very wrong.
    And no, again, not all Scots have red hair.

    What it appears, to me, is that you have obviously watched too many Simpson’s episodes to believe that we all have red hair. Norse men had red hair. Welsh and Irish too. You are generalizing, incredibly, stating that Scots are defined by their hair colour.

  274. Anon[406] • Disclaimer says:
    @Fart Blossom

    Point taken. But my point is simply that most of the Jews who perished under Nazi Germany, and I’m sure there were many — at least 600,000 — were middle-class middling Jews, not the powerful financiers and politicians that Hitler so hated.

  275. Corvinus says:
    @White Elephant

    “I think you’ll find that there very much has been.”

    Cultural influence by Jews? Yes. Cultural subversion? Depends of a person has been conditioned to blame Jews for everything.

    “to say the least and your arguments have been thoroughly demolished by the aforementioned authors“

    Confirmation bias, huh.

    “and there very much has been a concerted effort, by organized jewry to destroy western civilization (read Christian/non jewish/goyim).”

    Let’s assume you are correct. Other than lamenting on this fine opinion webzine, what are you doing about it? I mean, if it’s been over 50 years of this Jewish dominance over everyone, don’t you have a duty to whatever it takes no matter what the consequences to stop it?

    • Replies: @White Elephant
  276. Anon[406] • Disclaimer says:
    @Priss Factor

    The future must be neo-fascist or social-nationalist. It has to be about the union of rightism and leftism as both have much value to offer. So, stop dumping on the ‘left’ and focus on the supremacist manipulators of globalism, capitalism, and statism. At the top, it’s Jewish Power. Speak up for Palestinians because what Zionists did to Palestinians was dress rehearsal for what is being done to the West. Do everything to make the people, ‘right’ or ‘left’, more aware of who really rules the West. Point out that the core tenets of Globalism are really fueled by ultra-right Zionist Supremacism, not by Leftism.

    Brilliant comment and observation! I have a friend who’s a Jewish Trump supporter. He totally is seduced by the Fox news mantra of George Soros leftists destroying America. But my friend is also a rabid zionist, a mocker of 9/11 truth, a supporter of endless imperial wars in the middle East etc etc. He has no conception of how Jewish power has undermined American civilization. He is comfortable with the Fox news belief system that only leftists are enemies of America and rightists, even if they are Zionist Jews, are perfectly compatible with American society.

    It does seem to me however that there is a global power power struggle going on within the Jewish community, between right-wing nationalist Jews who generally are zionists, versus left wing internationalist globalist Jews. I think ultimately they are competing for the support of the Jewish financial overseers like the Rothschilds and Rockefellers. The goyim are simply spectators on the sidelines invited to cheer on this clash of Titans. But the Titans themselves look at us as a pathetic cheering section of losers. It’s best not to be entranced by their evil antics.

  277. geokat62 says:

    Telegram comment posted by Jack Fell:

    Wife of J6 Political Prisoner Speaks Out

    “I don’t understand how this can be tolerated in the USA of all places.”

    It’s very sad to see the result of the US having been cajoled into serving on the wrong side of the major wars of the last 160 years. The United States has been ruled by variants of Jewish Antifa increasingly ever since, and that is why Antifa are untouchable, and out in the open, today.

    There is no relief in Republican vs Democrat to this deep-seated rot. Trump made Jewishness (Antifa have been the Jews’ terror-shock troops for 120 years) akin to royalty which cannot be criticized, via Executive Orders.

    The sadism the J6 prisoners are being subjected to is straight from the Jewish NKVD and Cheka playbooks. They are being tortured and terrorized akin to the way the Nuremberg defendants were tortured and terrorized – by Jews and blacks in their service. See the torture of Julius Streicher at Nuremberg.

    The aims are the same – [1] inspire terror to enshrine Jewish political dominance unchallenged and [2] extract phony confessions to use to demonize opposition in order to maintain that political dominance.

    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/12/not-expose-peacefully-stand-tyranny-persecution-life-will-soon-look-like-family-wife-j6-political-prisoner-speaks/

    https://t.me/TheFallout/6846

  278. @Anon

    Anon: Thanks for your considered response. While composing my bit on the Puritans an inner voice brought up the matter of the English land-granted plantation Southern would-be aristocrats. However, the juggling act of adding that consideration to the mix was not attractive at the time. Thus, I’m delighted that you brought this out by exposing the bi-polar nature of America’s primary founders.

    Theirs were not the only templates, however: Roger Williams, a refugee from the Puritans, managed to get a grant to set up Providence Plantations, the original basis for our state of Rhode Island. It became a refuge for religious dissenters of all stripes. The second exception was William Penn, who received a grant to establish Penn’s Woods (Pennsylvania). That colony became a prime landing spot for his fellow Quakers and also soon was settled by numerous Germans, including those religious dissenters who ultimately became the Amish (who followed a man named Amos) and the Mennonites, who tended to prefer the arrangements forwarded by a guy named Menno.

    As for the Turtle Island native populations, one of my current reads is “Lame Deer: Seeker of Visions”, a Lakota medicine man. Years ago I read the biography of Black Elk, “Black Elk Speaks”, written by a professor named Neihardt at the University of Nebraska in Lincoln. More recently, yet another bio of this noted Lakota medicine man was produced by a gentleman name of Joe Jackson.

    It seems that the Lakota people, southwesternmost of the great Dakota nation and having migrated from the glacial moraine country in northwestern Minnesota after being driven westwards by the Ojibwa, who had a superior naval force (with their birchbark canoes) and guns from the French-Canadian fur traders; had developed a highly spiritually-infused culture.

    Because the Lakota branch of the Dakotas were the last of the major plains tribes to be taken down by US cavalry, European diseases, Whiteman’s whiskey and the missionary position, as given over to the mostly Roman Catholics by the government; they were able, mainly via the hands of these traditional medicine men, to retain much of their culture. All three of these books are highly recommended.

    Colorado: Ah yes, there was a major massacre at a place named later “Sand Creek” where a non-hostile band of Cheyenne’s (cousins to the Lakota or Sioux) was wiped out by a mounted Denver militia in an early morning sneak-attack in 1864. There was gold in them thar hills and the fevered urban settlers didn’t want the aboriginal folk anywhere in the neighbor. This occurred some 12 years prior to the battle at Rosebud Creek in southeastern Montana where a huge encampment of Lakotas under the Great War-chiefs Sitting Bull and Crazy Horse wiped out the major element of the 7th Cavalry at the Last Custard Stand.

    That conflict too, was mostly about gold, to be specific, the finds in the sacred mountains of Paha Sapa, which are now desecrated (like at Rush-More) as the Black Hills–a direct translation of their traditional name. Ironically, the Lakota/Sioux had been buttressed by contingents from their linguistic cousin nations, the Arapaho and the Cheyenne.

    “Turtle Island” was a term used by numerous tribes to describe this continent which came to be named after some Italian who never even set foot here. Amerigo Vespucci was primarily a map-maker.

    The Cheyenne, btw, known by their cousins as the Shakila, had been driven out of a section of eastern North Dakota–not far from the Lakota lands which were wooded but bordered on the prairies. They were essentially memorialized in one of the larger rivers in that state which still bears the name of the Sheyenne and by a small town, not far down the Red River of the North from the city of Fargo.

    Native place names for rivers, mountains , towns and cities are to be found pretty much throughout the land, excepting, oddly enough, West Virginia, where in consulting an atlas, I was unable to find a single identifiable placename. Curiously, the state with themost profuse native named locations, happens to be Florida. Go figure.

    Yes, the tribes in and around Cape Cod, who were so hospitable to the Puritan settlers on smallpox-depopulated native lands, were later wiped-out by those self-same Puritans and their descendants.

    Another book you might wanna check out is “1491”, by an author whose name does not come to instant recall. It describes the “Americas” before Columbus thought he had discovered India by sailing westwards

    . Without native help in introducing the Puritans to maize (corn) and other local foods, the invaders likely would not have survived the winter. Their original plan was to settle more southerly down the coast in a less harsh climate.

    • Replies: @Anon
  279. @Corvinus

    The historical record is mostly propaganda, so you’re wrong there, buddy-boy. You know you’re wrong though, because it’s a lie, but that fact you try to type it here with a straight face is comical.

  280. Mulegino1 says:
    @karel

    Perhaps, you may have heard of ”the prison of nations” devised by Austria-Hungary.

    Have you heard of the “prison of nations”; i.e., nations that are subordinate to the Atlanticist-Zionist Empire/NATO and its forcing neoliberal globohomo and globalization on its subject peoples?

    Being subject to the “Pentagram” and a censorious and anti-national sovereignty hive of bureaucrats in Brussels is far worse than being subject to an Emperor in Vienna.

    • Replies: @karel
  281. Anonymous[164] • Disclaimer says:

    Corvinus is a disgusting cuck.

    • Agree: Tony massey
  282. geokat62: “Rather than allowing UNLIMITED immigration of non-whites into the country (which is a ridiculous proposition on its face), the following article, LaRaza: Mexicans in the United States Census, explains the real reasons why Johnson-Reed never placed restrictions on people from the Western Hemisphere. Glenn E. Hoover, writing in Foreign Affairs in 1929, argued that Mexicans were largely Indian in background and their immigration thereby violated the clause in the Immigration Act of 1924 excluding the entry of immigrants racially ineligible for citizenship, then available only to “‘free white persons and to persons of African nativity or descent.’””

    You’re obviously one of those twits who thinks he knows all about the 1924 Act without actually having ever taken the trouble to read it. Plenty of mestizos were already US citizens under the 1848 Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo, so there was no racial requirement for citizenship that barred mestizos. In fact, the word “race”, just like the word “Jew”, never even occurs in the Act. The classification of certain immigrants as non-quota means that UNLIMITED numbers are permitted. What’s so hard to understand about that? The Act defines non-quota immigrants and reads:

    Non-quota immigrants.

    Sec. 4. (c) An immigrant who was born in the Dominion of Canada, Newfoundland, the Republic of Mexico, the Republic of Cuba, the Republics of Haiti, the Dominican Republic, the Canal Zone, or an independent country of Central or South America, and his wife, and his unmarried children under 18 years of age, if accompanying or following to join him;

    Needless to say, most people born in Mexico and the countries of South and Central America are mestizos, and this section of the Act specifically allows them in as immigrants in UNLIMITED number. Further, it was already settled law (see United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898)) that any children born to them while here would automatically be US citizens under the 14th Amendment. Thus, it’s entirely fair to say the 1924 Act wasn’t a racial defense by whites, as it has been mischaracterized by MacDonald and others. If anything, it was the opposite. Under it, people from every race in the world were permitted to immigrate into the US, some in UNLIMITED number. The only sense in which the Act was restrictionist was that it reduced immigration from Europe. The quotas it set cut immigration from Europe by more than 50%, from 356,135 in 1922 to 161,546 in 1925! By contrast, immigration from Africa and Asia actually increased; Africa by more than 10 times.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_Act_of_1924#Quotas_by_country_under_successive_laws

    If you want to read the whole Act, it’s available here:

    https://web.archive.org/web/20090228084926/http://www.civics-online.org/library/formatted/texts/immigration1924.htm

    • Replies: @geokat62
  283. karel says:
    @Mulegino1

    Being subject to the “Pentagram” and a censorious and anti-national sovereignty hive of bureaucrats in Brussels is far worse than being subject to an Emperor in Vienna.

    Perhaps, but it is no consolation for the three hundred years of oppression and exploitation.

  284. Anon[553] • Disclaimer says:
    @Emerging Majority

    This is a fabulous comment. Thank you so much. The book 1491 is by Charles Mann. I read his other book, 1493, about the changes in the world following Columbus’s voyage. It’s extremely well-written and fascinating. It has a lot of unknown historical tidbits such as the reason why they started bringing African slaves to America was not out of racism but for the simple fact that there was widespread malaria in North America throughout the southeast where the big plantations were. The original laborers were Scots-Irish indentured servants and they were found to be extremely vulnerable to the malaria whereas simply through trial and error black laborers were seen to be much better able to withstand the malarial conditions. According to Mann, this was the trigger for the mass importation of African slaves to the Americas:

    Are you Native American yourself? You seem to have deep knowledge of their history and culture. I have always been fascinated by them. I dated a woman who was part Cherokee and I often asked her why she wouldn’t want to live on a reservation. She told me that the Cherokee live with relative dignity in Oklahoma, but most Native American reservations are poverty-stricken dumps. Personally I would be willing to live in such a place. They are quite similar to some of the West Bank settlements that the Jews are establishing all over that area.

    Here’s a joke I hope it doesn’t offend you:
    Q: Why do most Indian tribes hate the Sioux?
    A: They’re jealous of their Lakota many colors!

    I have supported the St Labre Catholic Indian School in southeastern Montana that caters to Cheyenne and Crow. They seem to foster native cultural practices among the students even as they try to provide them a first-rate education. Do you think such establishments are worthwhile or do you see them as snuffing out genuine native culture? The man who runs this operation seems to be extremely devoted to his kids. He’s a Native American Catholic convert. I also have read that Chief Red Cloud converted to Catholicism.

    Perhaps I am romanticizing them, but it seems clear to me that the Indian tribes knew how to live in harmony with the natural world much better than Europeans. I think my Jewish genes respect Native American tribal values. The Jewish elites in their gated communities and penthouse apartments have completely perverted the Old Testament ideal of tribal agricultural settlements. They play make-believe with one hour a week in their synagogue or their various Jewish or Zionist organizations, but none of them knows how to live in a tribal community.

    [MORE]

    The same is true in Israel itself. It’s funny to me when Christian Zionists wax eloquent about Israel being the resurrection of the biblical world. Biblical Israel was probably 90% agricultural peasants with an elitist Jewish priesthood in Jerusalem. Today’s Israel has barely any agriculture at all and all of those West Bank settlements that we read about are elitist bedroom communities for Jews who commute to Tel Aviv or Jerusalem to work in high-tech or other professions. By far the majority of agricultural work in Israel is done by Palestinians whom the Christian Zionists denigrate. But they are the ones who truly have the biblical values of agricultural community.

    By the way, some time back Ron Unz wrote some disparaging comments about Native Americans, claiming that they only amounted to perhaps 1 million souls prior to the European colonists arriving. He also claims that the vast majority of Indians perished due to disease and alcoholism and not because of any malicious acts by the white settlers. I don’t believe that is true and I wonder what your view is?

    I was shocked to discover that Abraham Lincoln, whom blacks abd others revere as “the great emancipator”, was a bitter foe of Indian interests. As a young man he joined the Illinois militia to fight in the Black Hawk War. Also even more significantly during the Civil War he aggressively promoted the Transcontinental railroad vision. It turns out the railroad was the single greatest factor in dispossessing Indians of their lands and also for decimating the buffalo population. Buffalo would stampede and destroy the railroad tracks so the railroads encouraged passengers to shoot them indiscriminately leaving their corpses to rot on the plains. Also train passengers did not enjoy traveling perhaps two thousand miles across desolate landscape facing the peril of the Indian attacks. And for this reason the US military was dispatched to run the Indians out of any territory that the trains were crossing.

    As you mentioned, whenever gold or other precious minerals were discovered treaties were torn up and abrogated and the tribes were forced out of the region. I was shocked once walking through beautiful Boulder Colorado to see a memorial to Chief Niwot whose group lived there. According to the plaque the chief and his tribe were displaced to Sand Creek where, as you mentioned, they were brutally massacred. After I read that I have never been able to enjoy Boulder the same way.

    The Honorable thing would be have been for Americans to lease mining rights from the Indian tribes without dispossessing them of their sacred treaty lands. But the Americans didn’t do that. Instead they conjured up excuses to steal their land and to take the mineral wealth for themselves. It’s all despicable and contributes to the negative karma that is exploding today against white Americans.

    Recently there have been proposals to turn over the entire National Park system to the management of Indian tribes. Have you heard about this what do you think of it?

    I’ve seen sketches depicting the first English colonists encountering some of the native tribes along the east coast. The natives in their loincloths and headdresses look like Greco-Roman gods compared to the sickly scrawny and overly dressed Europeans. It was their vulnerability to European diseases that did them in; otherwise they were vastly stronger than the European Invaders.

    I have read that one of the triggers of the American revolution was colonial resentment of the British government prohibiting settlement west of the Appalachian mountains, in order to protect the rights of the Native American tribes. The American colonists consider this an unlawful limitation on their natural rights to take everything between the Atlantic and Pacific coasts.

    Since you mentioned Minnesota, I have some questions about how the tribes lived there. Did Indian tribes dig outhouses for their waste? I’m sure they were very careful not to pollute their drinking water supplies. What did Indians do in the winter when the streams and rivers were frozen over? Did they simply melt snow for drinking water? And finally how did they cope with mosquitoes? Especially when they dressed with loin cloths in minimal attire how did they cope with the torment of mosquitos that are so prevalent in the swampy areas where they lived in Florida and around the great lakes? Did they have a natural immunity to mosquitoes? Some blood types mosquitoes apparently don’t like to bite. Did they use animal fat or some other substance as a kind of natural insect repellent?

    Thank you for sharing your fascinating wisdom with the rest of us!

    • Replies: @Emerging Majority
  285. @Corvinus

    “Cultural influence by Jews? Yes. Cultural subversion? Depends of a person has been conditioned to blame Jews for everything.”

    Culture has been subverted through influence. Control of academia, the msm, arts, the film & music industries have all worked in tandem to do this. And we can safely say that control of the political establishment has enabled all of this.

    “Confirmation bias, huh”.

    No, simply through their writings have people demolished your argument Corvinus. Then of course there ample evidence from videos on JewTube, from the mouths rabbis. There’s the Babylonian Talmud, there’s writings from historians, authors, philosophers going back to BC, swishing of the Jews.
    Once you start investigating Jewish cultural subversion, you can’t help but find proof, if that is you choose to accept your findings or just press them off as any semitism or lies.
    You don’t get kicked out of over 100 lands, over 1,000 times, for good behaviour.

    “Let’s assume you are correct. Other than lamenting on this fine opinion webzine, what are you doing about it? I mean, if it’s been over 50 years of this Jewish dominance over everyone, don’t you have a duty to whatever it takes no matter what the consequences to stop it?”

    Well I have been, for over 10 years now, since I uncovered their subversion. I’ve written many articles, replies on websites & forums, spoken directly to people about it and done all I could save enacting in terrorism, to try and awaken others to this threat. But the most important thing, I’ve done, is acknowledge there is Jewish cultural subversion, through ideological subversion. You haven’t for you do not see it, either through cognitive dissonance or because you are a jew, acting as a goy.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  286. geokat62 says:
    @Dr. Robert Morgan

    You’re obviously one of those twits who thinks he knows all about the 1924 Act without actually having ever taken the trouble to read it.

    … and you’re obviously one of those twits who loves to mischaracterise the intent of an important piece of legislation, lol.

    Exhibit “A”:

    Thus, it’s entirely fair to say the 1924 Act wasn’t a racial defense by whites, as it has been mischaracterized by MacDonald and others. If anything, it was the opposite. Under it, people from every race in the world were permitted to immigrate into the US, some in UNLIMITED number. The only sense in which the Act was restrictionist was that it reduced immigration from Europe. The quotas it set cut immigration from Europe by more than 50%…

    The picture you’re trying to paint makes it seem as though the intent of Johnson-Reed was to radically alter the demographics of the country… that it was a piece of progressive legislation. Nothing could be further from the truth!

    Two examples:

    1. The Immigration Act of 1924 was blatantly inspired by eugenics, and was passed with the intent of “preserv[ing] the ideal of American homogeneity”. However, this should be viewed in the light of the period, when eugenics was a common practice for many governments all over the world.

    https://historyplex.com/immigration-act-of1924-effects-significance-summary

    2. Looking back on the significance of the act, Harry Laughlin, the eugenicist who served as expert advisor to the House Committee on Immigration during the legislative process, praised it as a political breakthrough in the adoption of scientific racism as a theoretical foundation for immigration policy. Due to the reliance upon eugenics in forming the policy, and growing public reception towards scientific racism as justification for restriction and racial stereotypes by 1924, the act has been seen as a piece of legislation that formalized the views of contemporary U.S. society. Historian Mae Ngai writes of the national origins quota system:
    At one level, the new immigration law differentiated Europeans according to nationality and ranked them in a hierarchy of desirability. At another level, the law constructed a white American race, in which persons of European descent shared a common whiteness distinct from those deemed to be not white.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_Act_of_1924

    Oh, and the lions share of those Mexicans who were permitted to freely cross the border under your “non-restrictionist” 1924 Johnson-Reed Act were duly deported to Mexico in the 1930s in mass deportations (see Operation Wetback). So much for unrestricted immigration from the Western Hemisphere, lol.

  287. Blodgie says:
    @Anon

    We’re not talking about managing suffering.

    Christians think it is the entire point of life.

    Original Sin says you are a sinning POS and always will be as well.

    Yeah, I wonder how these people were so easy to control, manipulate and defeat.

  288. Oracle says:
    @Corvinus

    To the guy who thinks he’s more clever than a crow,

    The culpability lies in having created movements such as feminism, multiculturalism, open borders, or promoting methods of undermining the family, erosion of previous societal values and behaviours, Boasian relativism in academia, encouraging sexual beliefs and behaviours that lead to infertility and lack of reproduction, miscegenation, ridiculing only one racial identity while encouraging all others, promoting media domination and Bernays propaganda and so on. The covert ways of destroying a civilization seem to be endless, but avoiding discovery and culpability for having done so, is not possible.

    • Replies: @Blodgie
    , @GeneralRipper
  289. geokat62: “The picture you’re trying to paint makes it seem as though the intent of Johnson-Reed was to radically alter the demographics of the country… that it was a piece of progressive legislation. Nothing could be further from the truth!”

    Yeah, color me shocked that politicians lied to the American public!

    I say that any Act which allows for UNLIMITED immigration from all countries in the Western hemisphere is not a racial defense of their territory by American whites, and that any impression to the contrary that the legislators tried to leave with a meaningless “statement of intent” was only propaganda to flimflam the rubes, a category in which we can apparently number you as well. Likewise with the periodic deportations of the 30s and 50s. What good does it do to deport them if they can just turn around and come back in? As Ron Unz has pointed out, the 1965 Act at least set limits for such immigration, although even those limits are largely ignored, and have been for decades. It’s true that you can now find many articles in wiki and elsewhere decrying how “racist” the 1924 Act was, but calling whites racist is just standard operating procedure for leftists. It actually cut white immigration.

    The greatest demographic threat to American whites is now “Hispanics”, a racially mixed group consisting largely of Mexicans. Even though United States interest in acquiring Mexico and exploiting its people and resources goes back almost to colonial times (Alexander von Humboldt’s 1811 Political Essay on the Kingdom of New Spain depicted Mexico as a land rich in natural resources and did quite a bit to stimulate this interest), it is now starting to look like it is Mexico that is acquiring the United States instead. It’s a pity this demographic threat wasn’t perceived earlier, but the fact is it wasn’t. The West and the Southwest portions of the United States formerly were part of Mexico, seized by war, and even the 1924 Immigration Act, which presumably was written without much input from Jews and was passed over their vociferous objection, did absolutely nothing to limit immigration of Mexicans or immigration from any other country in Latin America. In keeping with the Monroe Doctrine, the entire Western hemisphere was regarded as, in a sense, United States territory, with fluid movement of men and materials between regions. No provision for reserving N. America for whites only ever existed in United States law.

    Without such a provision, it’s very clear that the long term outcome of such a free trade and open borders policy is demographic and cultural suicide for the numerically much smaller white populace. Jews may cheer it, but they’ve had little to do with setting the policy in place.

    The mixing of populations is an integral part of having an empire. If America had truly wanted to remain a white country, it should have turned away from this path. Instead, today’s demographic realities are making it clear that American whites have chosen their own racial obliteration.

    • Replies: @geokat62
  290. geokat62 says:
    @Dr. Robert Morgan

    Without such a provision, it’s very clear that the long term outcome of such a free trade and open borders policy is demographic and cultural suicide for the numerically much smaller white populace. Jews may cheer it, but they’ve had little to do with setting the policy in place.

    Look, let’s be clear. If Jewish Supremacist Organisations (JSOs) hadn’t successfully pressed Congress to pass Hart-Celler in 1965, the United States would still be predominantly white. There’s no getting around this simple fact, no matter how hard you try.

    Instead, today’s demographic realities are making it clear that American whites have chosen their own racial obliteration.

    Chosen, huh? Just like their European counterparts?

    Then what do you make of Barbara Lerner Spectre’s little declaration?

    I think there is a resurgence of anti-Semitism because at this point in time Europe has not yet learned how to be multicultural. And I think we are going to be part of the throes of that transformation, which must take place. Europe is not going to be the monolithic societies they once were in the last century. Jews are going to be at the centre of that. It’s a huge transformation for Europe to make. They are now going into a multicultural mode and Jews will be resented because of our leading role. But without that leading role and without that transformation, Europe will not survive.

    As Ron likes to say, you’re trying to prove rocks don’t fall downward, lol!

  291. Blodgie says:
    @Oracle

    The more important question is why were American institutions so easy to defeat?

    The Church was soundly defeated by the culture wars.

    • Replies: @White Elephant
  292. @Anon

    Whew! You present a lot of questions as well as additional information and viewpoints. In 1973 after living in a number of cities, I returned to my rural roots in an area which was “surrendered” in 1896 by a nearby reservation.

    This neighborhood was the last fully viable true homesteading land and it essentially became the locus of a flood of Norwegian immigrants, dotted with a few islands of Swedish. Because it had not been previously opened to white settlement, or destruction of its forests, the timber barons, such as T.B. Walker had been unable to massacre the remaining whitepine groves or the northwesternmost extension of the great Eastern hardwood belt. So that was left to the settlers.

    My small rural re-homestead is located almost precisely halfway between the two largest Ojibwa reservations in the state. In this neighborhood, relations with the natives was somewhat schizophrenic, being neither particularly hostile, nor truly neighborly. There were sexual relationships, however, particularly with the “open” reservation to the south. Thus that Rez has a rather bleached-out population, with only a relative handful of “bloods”.

    [MORE]

    The closed reservation to the north retained much of its sovereignty and by the 70’s let the State government know what for.

    One village of that Rez still retains much of its traditional heritage, including tiny “huts” in which above-ground burials are still made by some families. They also did not take much towards the missionary position, which was the case on the other end of the lake where Catholicism was imposed by Nunly rulers and other methodologies aimed at deracination.

    Chief Niwot. Now I know how that little burg (as of 1995) got its name. Stayed for a week with antiquer friends in Longmont and bought some items from a man in Niwot who had a trove which was far to huge for me to even imagine transporting–an amazing collection of National Geos going back as far as the early 20th Century. Haven’t been back to Colorado in years, but in regular touch with a friend who lives in Centennial.

    As one who endeavors to walk the Spirit Path, I feel a deep resonance with native culture and history, most particularly with the Lakota people and most particularly with the little village of Rosebud, where I was most warmly welcomed be people I met there. A young man from that place, one Carl Petersen, recently graduated at a South Dakota university, has developed something wonderful for the “gamer” crowd among his contemporaries. It is a course in the Lakota language, presented in game form. Somewhere in my notes is the name of a woman from England who lives there and has produced articles appearing over the internet.

    Should you wish to “adopt” yet another Rez, you might wish to do some research on that one, where the Hunkpapa sept is located, Sitting Bull’s people. Peering to the right and slightly behind this screen stands a photo of that great leader.

    A dream I attempted to share with a recently deceased friend, a Marxist leftie, who lived within the porous boundaries of the Rez to my south and who had lived in Manhattan for 20 years before moving up here, centered on him willing his splendid bit of land to a peace consortium for establishing a bi-national village where Lakota people would meld with Ojibwas as a place for healing the bad vibes created when the latter drove the former southwestwards into the prairies only some 300 years ago.

    Unfortunately for my visions of peace, he decided at that time to will the place to the White Earth Land Recovery Project, then headed up by Ralph Nader’s running-mate some years ago, Winona LaDuke. LaDuke’s father had somehow ended up in Hollywood, where he played native roles in a number of movies. He ended up marrying a Jewish woman, so by Orthodox Rabbinical “law”, this “outsider” leader on her Rez is technically Jewish by the edicts of the Sanhedrin.

    You mention having dated a woman who was of Cherokee extraction. Congruently, I had about a month to enjoy the company of an individual who happened to be perhaps the most highly-energized person I’d ever met. Father was a Jewish Colonel in the U.\$. Army. Mother was half Cherokee and half Southern white.

    Carl Jung posited that there is no such thing as coincidences. Everything is connected, as All is One and one is All, with the whole being equal to, yet greater than the sum of its parts. My resonance with the native peoples quite possibly emanates from a prior lifetime where I lived that. One of my internet go-to’s is Soren Dreier, who (very slightly paraphrasing) said that you do not meet new friends, you recognize them.

    Your mention of turning over National Parks to native peoples is the first time it had come to my attention. Fascinating. Another of my dreams is for a restoration of much of the semi-arid High Plains into a buffalo commons, where native villages would be located amidst those lands to properly manage the herd.

    Mosquitos: The Ojibwa/Chippewa traditionally employed bear-grease on their skin and rather smoky wigwams which the little pests found to be a bit unattractive.

    You will find resonance with the books of a pair of brothers wrote, primarily on native history. David and Anthony Treuer’s father was a Jewish refugee from Austria who wound up on the Leech Lake Ojibwa Rez in the late 30’s. He married a native woman. Tony also taught the Ojibwa language course at Bemidji State University for some years. A lot of resonance for you, perhaps.

    Should you have a desire to live on or near a reservation, I would recommend the villages of Waubun and Ogema and the small city of Mahnomen, a county-seat town and the site of a casino and a type of junior-college focussing on native youth.

    Deeper into the Rez proper is the village of White Earth, where the late Ray Warren, my NAG, (Native American Guru) was from.

    Because Mahnomen County is so far from high-paying jobs, both land and rents, at least in the eastern half of that scene, is relatively inexpensive. Winters can be a bit brutal, though. After a moderate snow and harsh winds yesterday, today’s temp here at 8 a.m. was -8 degrees Fahrenheit–fortunately with no wind and sunny throughout.

    Do stay in touch via this site. Should you wish to establish direct connection, perhaps Ron Unz could be convinced to be of assistance in maintaining a morsel of privacy for us, by providing a means by which each and every nutcase that haunts these messagings would NOT be privy to any possible furtherance of specificities.

    • Replies: @Mevashir
  293. @Blodgie

    Why was the American church defeated? The answer lies, predominantly (other than jewish infiltration of it through the Jesuits) with the Schofield bible. When one reads into Schofield they find a despicable individual, a failure in life who sold out to the jew. And through this bible was created the millions of US evangelicals led down the path by the likes of Hagee et all.

    While not from the US, I’ve been to America and the first thing that struck me, was the overall politeness of them all. They were friendly, accommodating and nice to be in company with. I could also use the word ‘green’ to describe many, but only because the danger they didn’t see coming was one they didn’t expect.

    My mother is approaching 90. She comes from a generation that saw good in people and not the bad. She fails to see the truly evil individuals there are in not just the US establishments, but throughout the west. They have been thoroughly subverted. She can’t even begin to fathom the level of evil. She is oblivious to it.

    The subversion promotes, very much, the gullibility of the western people, only because they don’t expect the level of evil that’s afoot. They don’t expect their age old institutions to be subverted, let alone the church and cognitive dissonance sets in when you try to tell them that not just the church, but ALL institutions are the property of the Sanhedrin.
    All have been lulled into a false sense of security. The foxes have taken over the chicken coop and have made them believe they mean them no harm, while spitting feathers out of their mouths. When the clever chickens call them out, they shouted down as ‘foxists’.

    To sum up, one can describe the European people as those who lived on isolated farms, to have all the crooks and villains of city life be unleashed upon them, cities they’d never walked within. This, effectively, describes the goyim’s interaction with the jew.

  294. augusto says:
    @Franz

    There was a time when the best paid job in America was the trade of slaves.
    The slaves were not white , btw.
    Incidentally the second best paid one, was killing Indians.
    There was a time when black people were too busy to find out some food, to get rid of hand-and-feet chains and then for a class for their children. And a way to escape the block and county sheriff for anything they did – and also what they did not do – to start a meaningful violence against white society.
    I said ‘there was a time’. Well it lasted two and a half centuries.
    Now they had the chance, finally.
    Chance and turn.
    I dont justify it the backlash in kind, I understand it.
    Why not make the Congress vote a bill imposing a 20 pct tax on those stinky white FUNDING of BLM and their likes as mentioned by the author?

    • Replies: @Franz
  295. Mevashir says:
    @Emerging Majority

    If you can find my email address off my blog, please write to me. I am being heavily censored here and cannot post the information I wish: http://www.mevashir.home.blog

  296. anarchyst says:

    Correcting the historical record and removing biases from such is one of the most important things that us whites can do.
    It takes approximately a hundred years for the historical record to finally “right itself” and shed itself of the biases of those who lived during the period.
    Just as the “jewish holocaust™” is finally being exposed for the fraud that it actually is, it is long overdue for the phony black “civil-rights” movement to be exposed for the fraud that it is and corrected as well.
    A few examples:
    After the American slaves were released from bondage, black crime went “through the roof”, expanding to a much greater degree than thought possible. This was the reason for the formation of groups such as the KKK and other “citizen’s councils” that were in place to “protect the peace” from marauding gangs of blacks with “nothing better to do”.
    In the twentieth century, blacks were always described as “peace-loving” types who were unfairly maligned and “kept down”. Although common, black criminal behavior was always downplayed and blamed on white “racism”. Us whites who lived during those times were aware that blacks were a “problem” and no amount of civil-rights coddling would change that fact.
    The misbehavior of blacks was always downplayed, not unlike the rioters in today’s cities being described as “peaceful demonstrators” (yeah, right).
    Amaud Arbery, George Floyd and Trayvon Martin are described as those who were “turning their lives around” with descriptions of them being “good boys” rather than the true black criminal thugs that they are (were).
    Martin Luther (Michael) King, Emmett Till, and Rosa Parks are the previous generation’s civil-rights “pioneers who were claimed to have been unfairly maligned.
    Martin Luther (Michael) King was not only a plagiarist, but was a well-known communist who enjoyed beating on women and prostitutes that he hired, claiming that beating them made him “feel like a white man”. His own associates have corroborated his behavior.
    Emmett Till is another example of black criminality whose mother could not control him. Till was sent to live with relatives in Mississippi as it was thought that his relatives could control him. Till constantly bragged about his sexual prowess with white women, which he could probably get away with in Chicago, but such behavior in the “deep south” would prove to be another story. On a dare from his black friends, Till fondled and manhandled (assaulted) a white woman storekeeper, claiming that no white woman could resist his “charms”. When brought to task for his crime, he refused to apologize–an apology is all that his captors wanted. If he had apologized he would be alive today. In fact, one of his captors was a black man. As an aside, Emmett Till’s father was executed (hung) by the U. S. military for multiple rapes. The “apple” most certainly did not fall far from the tree.
    Rosa Parks was an organizer for the NAACP (which was jew-run at the time) and was instrumental for her refusal to give up her bus seat to a white man. The refusal was a “setup” as there was no one else on the bus save for a UPI reporter who was contracted to “document the event”. She attended the jew-run communist “Highlander School” along with Martin Luther (Michael) King and others who were prominent in the “civil-rights” movement.
    To show how depraved blacks are, senior citizen Rosa Parks was robbed and beaten in her own home by black criminals (who probably were not aware that she was an “icon” of the civil-rights movement of the 1950s and 1960s).
    The historical record must be corrected to show the true nature of those who are presently held up as examples to emulate…

    • Thanks: White Elephant
  297. hhsiii says:

    Rasclot or rasscloth is basically Jamaican patois for asswipe.

  298. GeneralRipper [AKA "Nemo me impune lacessit"] says:
    @Oracle

    Thank you, sir.

    Excellent post.

    Corvinus is a sad specimen of a “Christian”, as well as an American.

    • Replies: @geokat62
  299. GeneralRipper [AKA "Nemo me impune lacessit"] says:
    @Mulegino1

    Truly great and inspiring anthem.

    Thanks for posting it.

  300. geokat62 says:
    @GeneralRipper

    Corvinus is a sad specimen of a “Christian”, as well as an American.

    Rumour has it that the man performing the foot washing in this video may be Corvinus.

    CRINGE OVERLOAD: Christian Foot Washing As Racialized Struggle Session

  301. Notice whites are ENCOURAGED or REQUIRED to adopt racial consciousness when criticizing whites, but are FORBIDDEN from expressing racial consciousness when praising whites. You’re allowed to say “We whites are a cancer on the world, enslaving, oppressing and colonizing others. We suck.” but you’re not allowed to say “We whites found the New World, brought our technology and innovated our way to the moon! We’re awesome!”

    • Replies: @Anon
  302. @Bardon Kaldian

    Once again, BK, you’ve knocked it out of the park! How silly of me to have imagined that there existed an actual group or cabal of wealthy ethnic Jews involved in culturally subverting the West. I’m glad you’ve put that old “chestnut” to rest.

    Granted, your response is somewhat convoluted at best, but I get your point. I shall do my best to avoid any “conspiracy theories” about Jews, and be mindful of my lying eyes and careful to avoid any documentation that says otherwise.

  303. Anon[124] • Disclaimer says:
    @Prometheus Martel

    You whites stole the new world from the people who already lived here after they saved your sorry asses from dying in the first New England winter.

    You innovated your way into total destruction of the environment.

    As far as the moon goes, you never went there it’s part of your bs culture of Madison Avenue all glossy fake advertising concealing the rotten underlying reality.

    • Replies: @GeneralRipper
  304. geokat62: “Look, let’s be clear. If Jewish Supremacist Organisations (JSOs) hadn’t successfully pressed Congress to pass Hart-Celler in 1965, the United States would still be predominantly white. There’s no getting around this simple fact, no matter how hard you try.”

    To believe that Hart-Celler was pivotal, you have to believe that setting limits to immigration numbers from the Western hemisphere was worse than having a policy of allowing UNLIMITED numbers. I don’t believe that. Also, to think that the US would still be predominately white you’d have to believe that whites would suddenly have become virulent racists and claimed N. America exclusively for themselves, which I also don’t believe. There are very clear cultural reasons why that has never happened, as I touch on above in tracing a current of anti-racism throughout American history. In 1986, the so-called “conservative” Ronald Reagan amnestied millions of mestizos. I don’t think there’s any reason to think that the same economic forces that drew them here wouldn’t have existed if Hart-Cellar hadn’t passed, or that Reagan wouldn’t have amnestied them. I’d also argue that if Hart-Cellar hadn’t passed, it wouldn’t have made American white women suddenly start having babies. The need for labor would have been the same, and those mestizos would have been here under either system. Since 1986 it’s only been more of the same. Illegal immigration is winked at or even openly encouraged, as it has been under the traitorous Biden regime. Whites still do nothing, and if anything even applaud their own racial demise.

    geokat62: “As Ron likes to say, you’re trying to prove rocks don’t fall downward, lol! ”

    No, I’m saying that the picture is a lot more complex than the one MacDonald so tendentiously tries to paint. All parties involved saw the path to empire as somehow benefiting themselves, and there was no lobby by whites to keep N. America exclusively for their own race. It’s a grave misreading of the 1924 Act to think of it that way.

    It’s also good you bring up Europe’s situation, because it’s very similar in that European whites are also not really standing up for their own blood and soil. They could, but they don’t, just like the Americans before them. Similarly, the white fertility rate in Europe is below replacement level. Similarly, there are economic forces at work that attract immigrants. It’s working the same way over there without Hart-Cellar.

    • Replies: @geokat62
    , @Adûnâi
  305. GeneralRipper [AKA "Nemo me impune lacessit"] says:
    @Anon

    You whites stole the new world

    There was no such thing as a “new world” until our people made it so.

    Who’s your Daddy?

    • Replies: @Anon
  306. geokat62 says:
    @Dr. Robert Morgan

    No, I’m saying that the picture is a lot more complex than the one MacDonald so tendentiously tries to paint.

    Speaking of complex pictures, perhaps you could explain this picture that SPLC’s Mark Potok painted on his office wall?

  307. Corvinus says:
    @White Elephant

    “Culture has been subverted through influence.”

    Due to a number of factors.

    “Control of academia, the msm, arts, the film & music industries have all worked in tandem to do this. And we can safely say that control of the political establishment has enabled all of this.”

    More like tens of millions of white people, of their own accord, who have made decisions regarding race and culture, which you personally disagree with. Take race mixing, for example. That is an individual choice. You and others label it as being an affront to decency, that is essentially evil. Feel free to think that way, but that does not mean you are correct in your analysis. Again, we have free will, and you seemingly desire to strip it away from us.

    “No, simply through their writings have people demolished your argument Corvinus.”

    That hasn’t happened.

    “Once you start investigating Jewish cultural subversion, you can’t help but find proof, if that is you choose to accept your findings or just press them off as any semitism or lies.:

    You mean when you begin with a false premise and then find only information that supports it.

    “You don’t get kicked out of over 100 lands, over 1,000 times, for good behaviour.”

    Maybe their behavior was actually good, and the people who kicked them out had ulterior motives?

    “Well I have been, for over 10 years now, since I uncovered their subversion”

    You mean you’ve been a slave to confirmation bias for that period of time.

    “I’ve done, is acknowledge there is Jewish cultural subversion, through ideological subversion.”

    More like you have assumed there is this cultural subversion, and white people have been duped over and over again. If that be the case, then white people are not as intelligent or have high time preferences as you think we do. Rather, they are a gullible people who deserve their fate. Well, I hate to break it to you, but millions of white people are quite aware of their surroundings, quite aware of their influences, either personal or communal, and it bothers you greatly we will continue to think and act in ways you do not approve of.

    “You haven’t for you do not see it, either through cognitive dissonance or because you are a jew, acting as a goy.”

    Except it doesn’t exist as you say it does.

    • Replies: @White Elephant
  308. @RockaBoatus

    It is silly to think that an ethnic/cultural group residing in other people’s civilization for centuries can fundamentally subvert that civilization by their conscious efforts – the one that had subdued the world, at that.

    To even think in such terms is a sure sign of paranoia & obscurantism. It is more ridiculous that belief in fairies or in Santa.

    • LOL: geokat62
  309. Anon[811] • Disclaimer says:
    @GeneralRipper

    Well for once I have to agree with you. The phony photo of the astronaut standing on the moon is perhaps the perfect symbol of white American civilization, the culture of deceit deception and delusion. It appeals to white people like you who are vain and full of fatuous conceit.

    Let’s imagine (against all reason) that the moon landing really took place. What does that mean? Only that Americans spent a trillion dollars leaving behind a beautiful blue and green planet to land on a desolate barren and lifeless void just for a photo op! They never mined the moon for minerals or found any useful purpose for it. Just to strut and fret their time upon that puny pathetic stage.

    If landing on the moon makes you feel better about yourself, I would feel better if you and millions of like-minded folks went there and never came back. You can do it in your dreams because the technology doesn’t exist to make it happen, not now and certainly not 50 years ago either.

    You are a proud raving fool and you will bite the dust full of arrogant delusions of glory and grandeur that were never yours and never will be.

    • Replies: @GeneralRipper
  310. Franz says:
    @augusto

    I dont justify it the backlash in kind, I understand it.

    So do I.

    And the richest people in the country own most of the land. Including the millions of acres marked as “government land”,

    They could easily create nations for every group in the USA for people who want to be with their own kind so… why aren’t they?

    Because they really do think they can get the poor and middle class of all races goaded into killing each other. Then the whole of the land will be theirs.

    They aren’t stupid. Evil, but not stupid.

  311. To update the failure of capitalism: that there is no longer any ways out but revolution from the bottom or genocide from the top!

    Race is not the problem..is no part of the basic problem! Race/racism is a tactic by the dominant system to deflect responsibility from itself as cause of the social chaos, destruction, genocide, overall social degradation and human decline…from its exploitation of society.

    Race/Racism is a massively effective tool of death for ordinary humanity, that works fully against the interest of ordinary people globally! and all the journalist who sell their souls for money to produce racist content to misdirect the people must not be forgotten when the time comes…

    THERE IS ONLY ONE HUMAN RACE..ONE HOMO SAPIENS RACE..EVOLVED IN AFRICA, BLACK SKINNED, SPANNED THE GLOBE AND CONTINUED TO EVOLVE INTO THE REPRESENTATION OF HOMO WE SEE TODAY..BLACK, WHITE, YELLOW, BROWN AND MIXED.

    WE HAVE PROVED THIS FACT BEYOND A DOUBT. THERE IS NO HUMAN THAT IS SEPARATE AND DISTINCT RACIALLY FROM ANY OTHER..ALL FROM THE SAME SORUCE.

    SO PUT THE GODDAMN CONTRIVED, FABRICATED RACE ISSUE ASIDE AND COME FACE TO FACE WITH THE BASIC HUMAN ISSUES WE MUST DEAL WITH COLLECTIVELY IN ORDER TO BEST ENSURE THE SURVIVAL OF THE HUMAN SPECIES TO SOME INDEFINTE EXTENT

  312. hhsiii says:
    @Ben Sampson

    Look between Tab and Shift on the left.

    • Replies: @Ben Sampson
  313. @Corvinus

    “Due to a number of factors.”

    Culture has been subverted through jewish influence upon western civilization. None more so that mass immigration, promotion of feminism, breakup of the family unit, the promotion of the LGBTQ+ and overall, turning the minority into 1st class citizens with the majority into 2nd class.

    “More like tens of millions of white people, of their own accord, who have made decisions regarding race and culture, which you personally disagree with. Take race mixing, for example. That is an individual choice. You and others label it as being an affront to decency, that is essentially evil. Feel free to think that way, but that does not mean you are correct in your analysis. Again, we have free will, and you seemingly desire to strip it away from us.”

    I have never, ever called out another for their choices that they make, with whom they choose to partner, but again, Corvinus, you fail to see the wood for the trees. The rise in miscegenation is down to one, simple, factor – forced immigration, putting immigrants into the heart of communities, into schools, universities and workplaces and education programs, at school to promote anti racist rhetoric (read white genocide), attacking any national who sees, forced race mixing for what it is – racial suicide.
    There would be no immigrants in the UK, were it not for the jews, behind the promotion of immigration and of late, the war in the middle east and Africa, that have created millions of refugees, who have made a beeline for the west. And who are behind the immigrant organizations? You’ve guessed it – the jews.

    “That hasn’t happened.”

    Yes, it has. I’ve seen many of your failed attempts at promoting liberal-left think on this forum to be thoroughly dismantled by people, well above your station in intelligence, understanding an knowledge. I am, in fact, doing precisely this in this reply.

    “You mean when you begin with a false premise and then find only information that supports it.”

    No Corvinus. Once you start investigating jewish cultural subversion you can’t help but find proof. Take the holocaust for example? The minute people started looking into the ridiculous claims, jews had made of the work camps in WW2 and calling them out for their lies; jewish control of government brought into effect ‘hate crime’ and holocaust denial laws (not laws but legislation and not crimes) to punish people who questioned the official narrative. In other words, the jews, brought about legislation to stop historians, from revising one particular part of history, which was an overwhelming lie. The truth cannot be silenced, only locked away, which is precisely what the jews do, to anyone who uncovers their agenda.

    “Maybe their behavior was actually good, and the people who kicked them out had ulterior motives?”

    If you see two men arguing in a bar, a fight ensues and they are both evicted, you’ll think wrong place at the wrong time. If you happen upon another bar a couple of weeks later and see another argument with one of the individuals, from the previous altercation, arguing again, with subsequent removal, you begin to wonder. If, again, you are in another bar, see another argument, with the same individual as previous, you understand, there and then that this individual is a trouble maker. You don’t get evicted from over 100 lands, 1000+ times Corvinus, for prejudice of the indigenous. It is what you do, within that land, that causes those indigenous to fall foul of you and and those ‘actions’ have been written about on here in articles and many comments.

    “You mean you’ve been a slave to confirmation bias for that period of time.”

    No, I awoke to the jew, having previously seen them as no different to non jews.

    “More like you have assumed there is this cultural subversion, and white people have been duped over and over again. If that be the case, then white people are not as intelligent or have high time preferences as you think we do. Rather, they are a gullible people who deserve their fate. Well, I hate to break it to you, but millions of white people are quite aware of their surroundings, quite aware of their influences, either personal or communal, and it bothers you greatly we will continue to think and act in ways you do not approve of.”

    No, I have not assumed, in the least. I have seen cultural subversion, through government policy along with judicial policy, brought about by jews and/or their shabbos goy, to drastically alter the western civilization. I am not, in the least, bothered by the likes of you Corvinus. I see you, as stated, either as an incredibly ignorant individual, who walks through life with blinkers on, or as either a jew impersonating a European, or a European shabbos goy. I am still yet, to make up my mind on precisely which.

    “Except it doesn’t exist as you say it does.”

    Oh yes, Corvinus, it very much does. As stated directly above, you are either an ignoramus, a jew or a shabbos goy. You believe as you do, because it falls into one of the above categories. There is no need to continue this debate, for it is plain, for all to see that you are one of the above three possibilities. If you are the latter two, there’s no changing your mind. If you are of the former, an ignoramus, suffering from cognitive dissonance, then the reality will only sink in, once the boot is stamping on your skull and bones are breaking.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  314. @hhsiii

    what the hell are you talking about you idiot!?

    • Replies: @hhsiii
  315. Antiochus says:
    @Mevashir

    I assumed the nom de plume of Antiochus in a fit of Anti-Semitic rage. Since I am half Jewish my inner Antiochus comes and goes. I suspect that the real Antiochus was probably a bit over the top… (as in insane) but hey, I can relate to that as well! In any case, I can assure you that Hanukkah was nowhere in my conscious mind when I typed those comments. Yes, God has a great sense of humor.

    If I was in Australia right now, I think I would be more afraid of the Australians than the Chinese. The Chinese play hard ball, no doubt about that. But they are too smart to kill any goose capable of laying golden eggs. I’m not sure the same is true for the Aussies who seem to have a bad case of death wish. The Chinese have their problems but understanding the dialectic between form and freedom is not one of them. One of Mao’s sayings that the West totally misunderstood was that “freedom grows out of the barrel of a gun.” Mao was a little (maybe a lot) like Antiochus. Neither of them were good men but they both understood the realities of their time and acted on them in important ways.

    I am not sure I agree that a world dominated by China would necessarily be any better than a world dominated by the US. I am also pretty sure that the Chinese are not intent on world domination – at least not in the way we in the West tend to think of domination. They want to be respected, and they need to be successful in trade in order to survive and improve their standard of living. But they have never in all of their history been imperialists. Genghis Khan was Mongolian not Chinese, but even he was not all that bad for his time. The Chinese also know that their language is too difficult to ever become the lingua franca anywhere. They want to build stuff and sell it and they are good at it. They will dominate to the extent that they can do that better than most.

    Most of the bozos like Chinaman’s Nightmare are just barking dogs who have never even been out of their own trailer parks. He was yapping about wet markets that he saw on Jewish TV or some Internet site for barking dogs. To be perfectly honest, most of the wet markets (not all of them) are less than hygienic and not my personal cup of tea. That being said, and as you indirectly implied, neither is McDonald’s or any slaughter house USA. As a kid I once witnessed my grandfather slaughter and butcher a cow in the hot Texas sun. It took him two days to complete the job, and the flies, rats and raccoons all got their fill. I was sick to my stomach and told him I was never going to eat any of his beef, which wasn’t even Kosher. He said, “why do you think we freeze it and then cook it.” Of course, now I know, his beef was healthier than anything you get today processed in refrigerated slaughter houses, sprayed with Clorox, and blessed by a rabbi.

    • Replies: @Anon
    , @sb
  316. Bookish1 says:

    All federal aid to Rutgers University should be cut immediately in response to that coons statement “we should take those mutherfuckers out”.
    Imagine if a white person at a university would have said about blacks “we should take those mutherfuckers out.”
    We know what the response would be.

  317. Mevashir says:
    @Ben Sampson

    Great comment. I agree with you wholeheartedly. With the proviso that the behavior of the rioting ghetto dwellers is extremely dangerous and warrants concern.

    As far as the professor’s lecture, Marianne Williamson was the most attractive part of it! I emailed the professor the following comment about his talk:

    [MORE]

    https://www.rdwolff.com/books
    https://www.umass.edu/economics/wolff
    https://youtu.be/IiEmfXECD9k

    The professor is very well-spoken but I think he is a Pollyanna. He is ignoring the depredations on our system by his co-religionists and other economic elites. They are like locusts that are stripping America bare for their own selfish greedy purposes. They have no compassion and they have no desire to moderate their behavior. The kind of gradual transformation he envisions will never happen.

    The American economy has entered a state of what I call feeding frenzy. Like sharks in a frenzy to gorge themselves on their bloody prey. You can see this in the compulsive maniacal behavior of the super-rich, who are never satisfied with what they have but are accelerated into greater and greater levels of greedy accumulation and oppression of the rest of us. This is a spiritual sickness of terrible profundity.

    When I was in yeshiva we were taught that the more money a person has the more he perceives he is lacking. This is because of the principle that nobody dies with half of his desires realized. So a billionaire perceives a lack of his second billion. Whereas a poor person only lacks the impoverished level of income he already has. I think this goes a long way to explaining the appalling behavior of America’s capitalist elites.

    • Replies: @geokat62
    , @Ben Sampson
  318. ”  “we should take those mutherfuckers out”.”

    Who was that coon…BLM?

    Who organised and paid for BLM!  Gave them so much freedom that the cops here, there and everywhere do not bother them!  So much so that while the white majorities do not agree with what BLM wants like this here https://www.rt.com/uk/542375-colston-school-name-statue-blm/ the cities states and national governments/parliaments give them what they want!

    The only money that gets that kind of respect in the world is Zionist money!

    The logical question is why would Black people in the western world behave as BLM does when by no logic I can see it helps the Black cause among the white and brown majorities.  The application of insensitive Black power if only going to stimulate resentment and harmful reaction that will hurt Black people immensely in time.

    Why then is BLM behaving the way they are focused?  Is it because of the nature of the money that finances BLM and controls the BLM leadership therefore?

    That is the same opposite focus I see here on the UNZ Review.  But that is a totally inaccurate focus at this time that does not help ordinary white people nor Black people.  So why are they focused where it is unhelpful on opposite sides of a/the racial divide?

    Is it because of the money and influence that organizes both sides of the racial divide…Zionist money and a Zionist publication like the UNZ Review?

    Ordinary people are totally directed away from the central principle in the basic issue we all face, must deal with successfully or we are toast:  Once we are born workers, remain workers in the world, must work for a living our social place and class interests is sealed relative to our opposite class the elites, the rich!  It is the same with the rich!  Born rich their interest is sealed…they represent the rich interest and must look after that interest or walk away to the other side.  There is no middle ground.  The situation must give way to the interest of one side or the other.

    So all the Black people who should be focused on their working class interests and all the white people who should be similarly focused are the target of the same money that has organised them to focus on racial nonrelatives, a misfocus, while we are all being depopulated by that same money.  

    The white guys here who hate Black people should realize that despite that hate that Zionist money has a jab for them that by hook or crook they are determined to get into their bodies…and into the bodies of all 7 billion humans alive at this time for every purpose save our freedom and security and actual lives.  We therefore have but one purpose…to ensure that the rich are rendered permanently unable to ever to that to the human species

    Our concern right now, this minute, is the social class issue that underpins the threat to the existence of the billions of ordinary humans alive at this time.  The rich intend to eliminate most of us and to establish a “Brave New World with the remainder”  Our job is to end the rich, to clean up society and to make sure that there is but one social class owning and running society…ordinary people the world over. 

    Richard Wolff gives us some ideas as to how this can be done.  There are a whole lot more ways it can be done and the potential for a massive successful life developed out of people’s control is endless.  but we must end the class problem first  by getting rid of the rich!

    That is their problem too but they know it is and are working assiduously on it.  In the process they have divided us and misfocused us and appear to be winning.  if they are it means the end of us and all the racism along the way…the very racism they were so successful in creating to divide and control and now to kill us off totally

  319. geokat62 says:
    @Mevashir

    As far as the professor’s lecture, Marianne Williamson was the most attractive part of it!

    Williamson, huh?

    “Fellow White person” Marianne Williamson (Vishnevetsky) Leads White People In a “Collective Apology” to Blacks…

    Here’s a little backgrounder on Marianne:

    Williamson was born in Houston, Texas, in 1952. She is the youngest of three children of Samuel “Sam” Williamson, an immigration lawyer, and Sophie Ann (Kaplan), a homemaker. Her family is Jewish, and she was raised in Conservative Judaism. Her father’s original surname was Vishnevetsky.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marianne_Williamson

    • Replies: @Ben Sampson
  320. geokat62 says:
    @Ben Sampson

    WE HAVE PROVED THIS FACT BEYOND A DOUBT. THERE IS NO HUMAN THAT IS SEPARATE AND DISTINCT RACIALLY FROM ANY OTHER..ALL FROM THE SAME SORUCE.

    You’re right. Franz Boas, the godfather of American anthropology, proved beyond any reasonable doubt that race is a merely a social construct.

    What he forgot to mention, however, is that in his religion souls are the defining characteristic that divides the wheat from the chaff.

    You see, some souls (Jewish) are blessed by HaShem with a divine spark, while others (goyim) have souls that are on the same level as animals.

    Now, let’s all put these superficial differences aside and worship HaShem, the creator of the universe!

    Oh, by the way, what’s the Yiddish word for “sucker,” again? Isn’t it “freier”?

    Don’t be a “freier,” goy!

  321. Anon[128] • Disclaimer says:
    @Antiochus

    Great comment. Thank you. I don’t live in Australia if that’s what you thought. I currently reside in Colorado.

    In a way I am half Jewish also. Both of my parents came from traditional Jewish homes but my father has retained his identity while my mother has completely abandoned it. We were raised as kids with minimal Jewish identity and no Zionism whatsoever. So in a sense I’ve come to see myself as the product of a Jewish father and non-Jewish or Christian mother. It means that we don’t fit in anywhere, but it also gives us a much broader perspective on life and society. As it says in the Bible much wisdom brings weariness to the soul!

    I don’t think Antiochus was a bad dude. Certainly in Jewish literature he is portrayed that way. But I think rather he was an enlightened Greek leader. I have read accounts from the Greek side that claimed that there was a civil war going on in Judea between traditionalists and hellenists. The traditionalist were murdering the more Hellenistic assimilated Jews and that is why Antiochus intervened from Damascus. I think you can definitely see the Greek perspective in this saga.

    It’s very interesting that as much as Jews villainize Antiochus they lionize Alexander the Great! There is a story in the Talmud that when Alexander was on his conquests he met the high priest in Jerusalem who came out and flattered him. And supposedly Alexander replied that before every battle he has a vision of an elderly man with a white beard encouraging him and he now thought was this Jewish high priest called Simon the Righteous [Shimon haTsaddiq]!

    To this very day Alexander is one of the rare Gentile names commonly used by Orthodox Jews. I’m not sure why they hate Antiochus and respect Alexander. It seems because Alexander allowed Jews autonomy to run their society under the dictates of their rabbis and spiritual leaders. Antiochus’ problem is that Jews of their own volition desired to adopt aspects of Greek culture provoking a Jewish civil war than Antiochus was forced to intervene in.

  322. @Mevashir

    I know Wolff’s economics more than I know the man’s personal life. I use Wolff because he is a known voice and can help to make these very crucial ideas and world experience legible and less fierce to those who should be paying attention to them…the working classes.

    But whatever Wolff is personally outside those ideas may not matter at all. Look at how he points to the ‘spontaneity’ of the ideas in the people currently, the supposed maturity of young people currently. That ought not to be a surprise of any sort. We live and learn! and despite the non stop efforts at dumbing down by constant elitist propaganda the simple logic of life can prevail.

    Let me suggest you should study the 1956 Hungarian revolution which was a massive popular and entirely ‘spontaneous’ uprising in which the Hungarian people prevailed in Hungary, and asked for the protection of the world to carry through their revolution – from the Russian ‘Bolshies’ of course. The Russian would have none of it moved in and smashed the Hungarian people.

    The point is Wolf is saying after the people not before them… and I think he admits that. Wolff did not create or develop such thought and I did not get the impression that he appropriated it as his own. What he is talking about is from the people in popular action around the world for a long time now, when they got the opportunity all along the way to take collective action to further the popular general social interest. I have been pointing out these ideas along the way right here but I learned if from the reports of the activity of ordinary people in heroic struggle around the world to bring in popular society and they were beaten back but the advances we discuss now

    But they were not taught by any academics, or trained Marxists, etc. They would have been exposed to whatever levels of leftism contained in their societies, involved unionism perhaps etc. But what workers had come to understand by the Hungarian revolution of 1956 is the nature of political parties, that such parties are parasitic in nature and would betray the society in the end… or even before the end.

    The people did not have much prior organisation by any such forces – unions, academics and their parties etc. the people were organised by their experience itself, as they are so organised everywhere. They work for a living and that is the greatest organiser of what is referred to as ‘spontaneous worker organisation’ in instant revolution. I don’t think it’s so spontaneous but….

    let me toss this in about the Hungarian Revolution of 1956:
    I know Wolff’s economics more than I know the man’s personal life. I use Wolff because he is a known voice and can help to make these very crucial ideas and world experience legible and less fierce to those who should be paying attention to them…the working classes.

    https://www.marxists.org/archive/james-clr/works/1967/forces/3-2-hungary.html

    Then there is this from Wicky Wacky that is useful:
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Significant_events_of_the_Hungarian_Revolution_of_1956

    CLR James is a legit intellect who left a huge body of world class work on which his rep is built
    Again here is Wicky:
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C._L._R._James

    • Replies: @Ben Sampson
  323. @geokat62

    Williamson is a 69 year old woman…looking` that well!!!
    such looks at that age must underpin a right, logical and sane heart

    Way to go Williamson. I found you looking for Wolff! no loss there!
    hahahaha

    • Replies: @geokat62
  324. @Ben Sampson

    “THERE IS ONLY ONE HUMAN RACE..ONE HOMO SAPIENS RACE..EVOLVED IN AFRICA, BLACK SKINNED, SPANNED THE GLOBE AND CONTINUED TO EVOLVE INTO THE REPRESENTATION OF HOMO WE SEE TODAY..BLACK, WHITE, YELLOW, BROWN AND MIXED.

    WE HAVE PROVED THIS FACT BEYOND A DOUBT. THERE IS NO HUMAN THAT IS SEPARATE AND DISTINCT RACIALLY FROM ANY OTHER..ALL FROM THE SAME SORUCE.”

    If that be the case why BLM?
    You do realise that people are not only NOT black, as it’s an impossible skin pigmentation and all are merely shades of browny-pink but also race is measured through cranial shape? There is even an article on here to prove that they can tell whether organs are from a black, white, Asian etc?

    You do also understand that it has been proven, although hidden from the public (for obvious reasons) that Europeans did not come from blacks? This can be found on the internet.

    You do realise that anyone who comes out to prove just so, they are ridiculed, vilified and driven from their careers?

    When jew owns all the major establishments, they are going to promote precisely what you ignorantly state in order to promote their ‘big bang’ nonsense, that we are all ‘chance’ creations? In doing so it’s far easier to promote the human as a drone, all the same, from relative cultures all the same, no difference, no uniquity, making humanity easier to control?

    By promoting that we are all the same, it’s far easier to condition the young (and older idiots) to accept immigration (invasion) as some immigrant Guardian journalists like to believe that where you’re born and thus nationality is merely luck. Yes, done people truly do believe we’re all the same.

    But again, why BLM? Why affirmative action/positive discrimination? If there were no races and thus differences between the races, then the West would still be the meritocracy it was for a very long time. Immigrant journalists promote the destruction of meritocracy stinky because they know that were they to compete with whites, they wouldn’t gain employment, not only because of lower IQ but also due to being a tiny minority.

    • Replies: @Ben Sampson
  325. geokat62 says:
    @Ben Sampson

    … such looks at that age must underpin a right, logical and sane heart

    More like it reflects her spending a shitload of shekels on plastic surgery.

    • Replies: @Ben Sampson
  326. GeneralRipper [AKA "Nemo me impune lacessit"] says:
    @Anon

    White Supremacy is reality, sonny. You’ll be happier and healthier if you just accept that fact and move on.

    Who knows, maybe someday in the future when those exceptional citizens of Wakanda invent a time machine, you can go back and live with the “indigenous peoples” before bad ol’ Whitey showed up. From what I’ve read it was like a combination of The Garden of Eden and Shangri La.

    Thanks for sharing.

    • Replies: @Anon
  327. @geokat62

    I have no interest in questioning all stuff like that all the time…to be in that constant frame of mind relative to everyone.

    I let all go if I have no reason to deal with it. Williamson’s looks struck me and when you mentioned her birth day I was impressed.
    That’s as far as I go

  328. @White Elephant

    “When jew owns all the major establishments, they are going to promote precisely what you ignorantly state in order to promote their ‘big bang’ nonsense, that we are all ‘chance’ creations? In doing so it’s far easier to promote the human as a drone, all the same, from relative cultures all the same, no difference, no uniquity, making humanity easier to control”

    What did I give you to conclude that about me…my opinion on the matter at hand?

    I conclude that Homo Sapiens had its origin in Africa, that all research flows congregate to produce such a conclusion, nothing abstract about it, and it stands until more facts appear, proven, you know facts…that alters and advances this conclusion

    it is not that my mind is closed…humans never know everything about anything so that it is a fact of existence that it is best to always hold an open mind. yet we can know enough about something to hold some about as incontrovertible as possible while open on the areas where alteration is possible and likely

    I do not see where the African conclusion is incontrovertible. There is nothing abstract about that. that it will be expanded surely but to solidify not to decertify the conclusion.

    African origin has been proven well enough. Is the conclusion generally accepted? No! quite the opposite. But go to the Geologists and the forensic biologists and all the sciences that feature in the collating of the story of the origins of humanity and the proof is there. And I am not prepared to allow race to distract me from class as the basic issue in current human affairs that must be resolved positively to ensure humanity goes on in good and sane order

    • Replies: @White Elephant
  329. My argument is that society no longer needs government and elected parliaments and political parties.  Society needs the people to rise up and dismantle all of that, take over and address the needs of society and in the process create the governing structures that can best carry out the needs and projects of society.

    That is what Wolff is talking about!  That is what the Hungarian people did on a major direct example of that in world history that demonstrated what they people could do running their own nation without any elite at all monopolising he wealth and power of the nation, taking the country to the cleaners for example

    The Russian Bolshevik empire went in and crushed the Hungarian people, took away their revolution and put back in the right wing traitors who proceeded to destroy the progressive forces in Hungary, all those who had created the popular democracy that began to create and set up as the went Hungarian democracy working for the people.

    That is the answer to the current social crisis of humanity…the people taking over and running the situation in their own collective national interest in all countries.  That is what is going to end wars and all the trouble in the world, and focus society on its real natural existential issues.

    But let me digress a bit: That Hungarian history soured me forever on the Russians.  Putin came in and seemingly revived the Russian nation, but look at the utterly weak kneed, lily-livered bunch of traitors they turned out to be when the Bolshies collapsed.  They were literally giving their country away to the western capitalist parasites.  

    And where did Putin come from, who selected him and made him president?  How could a total failure of a rat like Yeltsin select a good man when he was nothing of the kind, beholden to the capitalist leeches?

    So Putin has pulled Russia back?  ok!  But look at him and Russia in the Covid scam!  
    The Russian people are under massive pressure from the same people who are decimating the western population with Covid?  How have things changed for Russia/Russians when this is the case?  The very same people who brought Russia to its knees are still there keeping the same situation going

    That is why I hardly ever worry about the insults tossed by the USA to Russia and China… that could be a game! By what I see going on with the Covid games and the presence of the same money power in both of those countries, it looks like they are all in it together, working to slap down the entire planet.  

    I am stunned by the Russian government’s policies against the Russian people and Covid.  How in the hell could Putin be a great and good leader to allow the undemocratic mandating of vaccination of his people, the very same thing that the elite money classes want for all the ordinary people of the world and yet be enemies of the USA – the seat of the money power?

    • Replies: @geokat62
  330. @Ben Sampson

    You, along with others on this website fail to understand the situation that we’re in.
    Let me quote George Orwell from his novel 1984:

    “He who control the present controls the past. He who controls the past controls the future.”

    This is the reality that we face.
    I told a friend of mine, the other day, that the reason homosexuality was legalized was because of blackmail, from TPTB, towards the psychology departments in major institutions. They had correctly concluded that homosexuality was unnatural, immoral and perverted (abnormal) behaviour. They had come to understand that it was, a disease of the mind and that the homosexual, unlike heterosexuals, also tended to have many more complex, psychological issues going on with them. They were approached, by certain ‘individuals’ and simply told “you will renege on your findings on homosexuality and classify it as perfectly natural, normal and moral behaviour. Failure to comply will see your institutions no longer receive the funding it requires to operate and you will find yourselves unable to attain work in your field again.”

    So, the exact, same thing happened to anthropologists who were told to promote the Darwin, out of Africa nonsense. I will explain…
    According to Darwinism, the progenitor is outlived by the progeny. That is the new races, that evolve from the older races become extinct. There’s only one problem with this, of course. Most of the species that we are supposed to have evolved from (Darwinism is 100% bonafide BS btw) remain alive on this earth. If all the peoples, on this earth originated from blacks, then there would, simply, be no more blacks on this earth. They’d have all died out.

    This is one of many articles, you can find on the internet to prove the myth of all races coming from Africans: DNA Evidence Debunks the “Out-of-Africa” Theory of Human Evolution.

    There are many more facts of history, such as previous large population genocided by TPTB as is happening today. There is also evidence of incredibly far advanced peoples who lived on this earth before us. History, is a lie. It’s a colossal lie. And there are far too many fools who believe the nonsense written, not understanding that it’s there to promote an agenda.

    But there’s one, simple, reality that proves, overwhelmingly that we do not come from Africans (other than what’s already been shown above) and that is, were Africa, the originators of all peoples on this earth, they’d have built great civilizations. They’ve built none. Egypt was white. The house of Ptolemy (Cleopatra) was Greek. They would have led the way. They haven’t. There are parts of Africa that STILL haven’t invented the wheel. In fact, the best thing that ever happened to them (and subsequently the worse for all other peoples on this earth) was the slave trade. It took them from their backward, pre stone-age society, into a world, far, far more advanced than they could every hope to imagine. And this is precisely WHY the jew created the slave trade, because they knew that blacks would be their willing foot-soldiers in the future, to destroy the European (and after) and other non black/jewish civilisations.

    If you mix whites with blacks, the offspring, mixed race will have higher IQ’s than if it were black offspring, but a lower IQ than if it were whites. That’s proven fact. The anger, in inner city schools, by young blacks is because of their inability to concentrate and succeed, keeping up with the far more intelligent non blacks within. And thus, rage, violence and destruction ensues in the inner cities, through frustration. Blacks, have been introduced into societies, they not only don’t belong and never will belong, but are simply far too stupid to succeed within. They are, to put it bluntly, (with no degradation mean’t) ‘the monkey that dances, while the jew grinds the organ’. The only reason blacks are in employment is through racism, as there’s no where on this earth, they could rise above the higher IQ’s of the non black populations they inhabit and gain employment through meritocracy. Black people are the spanner in the works of world civilization. Anywhere they are, outside (and inside) of Africa, they destroy. Theft, assault, rape, murder are all part and parcel of society, when the non blacks allow them to inhabit them. And of course, the victims, other than non blacks are the majority. All of this is documented by statistics, from law and order services.

    Sadly, blacks are a blot on any landscape they inhabit. They destroy and the jews saw this when they unleashed them on the Caucasians. Western society is now so out of control and it’s precisely because jews have given them positions of power, authority and influence to change western civilization. The blacks, are the hammer, that jews bash whitey over the head with, while they get on with shaping the world into how they want it, which sadly is the removal of all non jews from it, with a small remainder left to be their chattel.

    • Replies: @Tony massey
    , @Ben Sampson
  331. geokat62 says:
    @Ben Sampson

    How in the hell could Putin be a great and good leader to allow the undemocratic mandating of vaccination of his people…

    Source?

  332. @Ben Sampson

    The Hungarian Revolution

    Blurb! THE END OF THE POLITICAL PARTY One of the greatest achievements of the Hungarian Revolution was to destroy once and for all the legend that the working class cannot act succesl3fully except under the leadership of a party.

    FACING REALITY
    https://libcom.org/files/James%20-%20Facing%20Reality.pdf

    Blurb
    Facing reality – CLR James and Grace Lee Boggs. Writing in collaboration with Cornelius Castoriadis and Grace Lee, James examines the practical process of social revolution in the modern world. “Springing forth from the utopian flames of self-emancipation kindled by the workers councils of the Hungarian Revolution.

    Blurb
    A key aspect of James’s ideas was that the new socialist society exists in the experience and actions of the working class in this society. In Facing Reality, which James wrote with Cornelius Castoriadis and Grace Lee, he developed this idea in relation to the Hungarian Revolution of 1956.

  333. @geokat62

    you may have got me there! I went by RT and that’s all.

    I will try to locate that report if I can find the edition not to long ago

  334. @geokat62

    With all due respect, Putin is NOT the man you think he is. He is a puppet of the jew, surrounded COMPLETELY by Chabad Lubavich and B’nai B’rith. He was raised by his next door neighbour jews practically. He is a puppet, as are all leaders.

    I suggest you read Fitzpatrick Informer.

    This website UTTERLY annihilates anything that paints Putin as a good guy. In fact he’s a good ‘goy. He’s merely playing his part in the Hegelian Dialectic.
    Yes, I know, the west’s pushing for war with Russia, which will bring in China. This has been planned for a long time. This will finally destroy the US, who will be invaded by Chinese, promised land there for their massive population, of which 1% have been vaccinated. The same with Europe, who will also be invaded and colonized by the Chinese.
    Covid is the distraction to genocide, as you know, but it’s also a distraction to the coming war with Russia and China.
    Putin, is most likely a jew, or at least a shabbos goyim.

    • Replies: @Anon
  335. @White Elephant

    Full confession; i believe Amerika did for a fact put men on the moon, lee Harvey did it, it was 19 mostly saudis…i am very doubtful James earl ray did in fact assassinate Michael King but it’s not much of an interest to many it seems…so i guess I’m topped off on the kool-aid.
    I have watched sacred geometry on joooootube and i don’t know what to think and their are others that for all I’m aware hail from reputable academies of higher learning and are themselves experts and i just don’t know what to think.
    I don’t believe humanity, at least in recorded history has ever been visited by extras in the cosmic play. At least i am unaware of any evidence as such.
    Sacred geometry is wayyyyyy over my education. I simply don’t know what to think about some of those…objects…unearthed from mine shafts usually but some very strange objects turn up in very unexpected places where nothing should be but it is.
    I assume these videos are truthful.

    • Replies: @White Elephant
  336. Anon[128] • Disclaimer says:
    @White Elephant

    Putin has very close relations with Russian Jews and with Israelis. He bought an apartment for his German language teacher from his high school days, who was a Russian Jewess who had moved to Tel Aviv. When she died Putin received the apartment back. So he actually owns real estate there:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=07CopsTjn8M
    https://www.timesofisrael.com/for-rent-a-tel-aviv-apartment-owned-by-putin/
    https://stljewishlight.org/news/world-news/vladimir-putin-inherited-an-apartment-in-downtown-tel-aviv/

  337. @White Elephant

    “If you mix whites with blacks, the offspring, mixed race will have higher IQ’s than if it were black offspring, but a lower IQ than if it were whites. That’s proven fact”

    I am a Black man!  What! you think by my handle I am Jewish?  I have said many times here who I am.  I have known Black people all my life so many and so brilliant, whistle stop brilliant, in so many subjects/fields.

    Look here! I can go on and on with such argument: In sports whenever there were less limits and constraints put on  Blacks, players emerged who were so brilliant that they surpassed all expectations and imaginings.  That is the kind of brilliance in academia I am talking about

    [MORE]

    look at the constraints put on Black people in white society!  and horrifically in white education that Blacks must achieve to succeed in white society! 

    And on top of that we were/are dealing in an educational content that was made by white people for white people, suited white psychology… not the various Black orientations. 

    There was and is still little to nothing in white education for Black people, no positive view and emotional ambient that suits Black psychology.  And yet we excel to the extent that we have done in white education, despite additionally the routinely negative structure of authority of the schools in the provision of the education on a daily basis, which is punitive of Black people in the white education systems

    What comparative are you talking about then?  There is no proper comparative that can reveal any accurate results of the comparative intellectual abilities you are talking about. There are areas of life in the USA in which white people and others would not be able to match Black competence in a million years. It would be the same elsewhere where Black people live and dominate.

    And now that Black people have had along experience of white people when we can deal with the white way…and you know what I am talking. but again the issue is not race!

    But look! I went off discussing race with you but all of that is not basic to the human issue of our stage. the social issue of our day is class. that is what we must rectify so that the empire is done, hat capitalism is killed and a multilateral world reconvenes minus elitist social control, in which we can all excel in our proper and various environments globally

    He who controls the future and past…! hahahaha

    I see nothing absolute in such control of those aspects of life in the examples of such control in the world currently.  Even when one acknowledges the elitist power there are no absolutes.  One can observe lots of points of destabilisation of such power structurally currently

    The Zionist elites just Jabbed 90% of the Jewish population of the world! How is that not a destabilization?

    If for example the Chinese wanted to smash the Zionist power they could begin to shed American dollars repatriating economic hell for the USA precipitating the end of USA power in the world in a short while.

    I have no idea why the Chinese and Russians sit by and take all the American shit when they can seriously do great harm to the empire, literally kill it?  What!  are they both afraid that Americans will try to kill the planet rather than go down and out? 

    Or are they in collusion with the Zionist power behind the scenes? 

    If they are then you are more right about your past and present control hypothesis than I imagine.

    I mean the Zionists lied about the past totally in their control of the past but that lie has not remained hidden.  It’s all out now effecting whatever destabilisation it might of the Zionist power it might.

    I don’t know but the Covid scam is the current key point and expression of the class issue in global society… and that is prolly why we find the Chinese Russians, and Zionist money/power in such close proximity as all 3 elites are protecting their collective elitist class interest.

    • Replies: @anarchyst
  338. Corvinus says:
    @White Elephant

    “Culture has been subverted through jewish influence upon western civilization. None more so that mass immigration, promotion of feminism, breakup of the family unit, the promotion of the LGBTQ+ and overall, turning the minority into 1st class citizens with the majority into 2nd class.”

    American culture has been developed and expanded upon by a host of people for the past 100 years, some of whom have been Jewish. Whether or not it has been “subverted” is merely an opinion.

    ”I have never, ever called out another for their choices that they make…”

    Of course you have. By extension, any and all white people who have supported immigration policies or feminist policies, for example, are your cultural enemy. They have turned you into a second class citizen. And you just stated that “race mixing is racial suicide”. So I choose to marry outside of my race, you are calling me out for my personal decision, one that has nothing to do with you. It is abundantly clear you would support the outlawing or restricting of that choice.

    “The rise in miscegenation is down to one, simple, factor – forced immigration, putting immigrants into the heart of communities, into schools, universities and workplaces and education”

    Lol, no. The mixing of the races has been going on for centuries. It just happens to be more prominent now.

    “to be thoroughly dismantled by people, well above your station in intelligence, understanding an knowledge.”

    That hasn’t happened.

    “Once you start investigating jewish cultural subversion…”

    A false premise by which you rely on confirmation bias to drive home the narrative. That already has been clearly established.

    “The minute people started looking into the ridiculous claims, jews had made of the work camps in WW2”

    Labor camps and death camps. Why should the Jews have been rounded up—taken from their homes by Nazis—in the first place, especially children and the elderly? How was it legal to deny free men the right to contest their detainment? Moreover, how do you account for the tens of thousands of Jews and non-Jews (Germans, Poles, Russians) with their lucid descriptions of those places? Is each person lying directly or indirectly? How are you able to tell for EACH PERSON?

    “You don’t get evicted from over 100 lands, 1000+ times Corvinus, for prejudice of the indigenous.”

    Of course you do, if there are cultural and religious factors in play.

    “I see you, as stated, either as an incredibly ignorant individual, who walks through life with blinkers on, or as either a jew impersonating a European, or a European shabbos goy.”

    You mean you desperately try to rationalize in your mind how millions of your fellow white people have been supposedly duped. But our eyes have been wide open for decades.

    “You believe as you do, because it falls into one of the above categories”

    A false premise, as well as a sweeping generalization. I get it, anyone who disagrees with you, they are automatically put in that category. In that way, you do not have to think critically.

  339. anarchyst says:
    @Ben Sampson

    Your race card is showing with your statement:

    look at the constraints put on Black people in white society! and horrifically in white education that Blacks must achieve to succeed in white society!

    And on top of that we were/are dealing in an educational content that was made by white people for white people, suited white psychology… not the various Black orientations.

    There was and is still little to nothing in white education for Black people, no positive view and emotional ambient that suits Black psychology. And yet we excel to the extent that we have done in white education, despite additionally the routinely negative structure of authority of the schools in the provision of the education on a daily basis, which is punitive of Black people in the white education systems

    Since “black psychology” is so “different”, it is obvious that you do not belong in white society and should repatriate yourself and your fellow kind to the the African continent. Hell, I would even pay higher taxes in order to make it happen.

    Science, mathematics, physics and other principles are neither black nor white but are basic scientific principles that apply to ALL humanity.

    We would all be better off.

    Observe every American black urban public school. Almost all of them are sh!tholes with the school student population being unable to read at grade level. Hell, the Detroit Public Schools student percentage of those at grade level is less than 20%, quite often in the single digits.

    The very few blacks who DO want a decent education are browbeaten by their black “peers” for “acting white”.

    Despite new buildings and state-of-the-art facilities, blacks STILL won’t learn. We would be better off closing these schools and flushing the money down the toilet.

    One fly in the ointment is that most blacks on the African continent HATE American blacks as American blacks do bring their dysfunctional behaviors and attitudes to native African blacks.

    The blacks that were exported to other countries as slaves were not the “best and brightest” but were the dregs of their respective societies. Village chiefs would routinely sell off their criminals, troublemakers, and dull-witted retards for “trinkets and baubles”…a win-win situation for the village chiefs and the slave traders, but a giant future liability to any country they were exported to.

    Thank you for explaining American black inability to thrive in white-run societies. You have done a better job of showing black dysfunctionality close-up…a much better job than I could have done.

    Regards,

    • Replies: @Ben Sampson
  340. @Corvinus

    American culture has been developed and expanded upon by a host of people for the past 100 years, some of whom have been Jewish. Whether or not it has been “subverted” is merely an opinion.

    Oh boy, this has to be my last reply to you as you clearly do not accept fact, as you promote your rhetoric that it isn’t the jews, even though your posting on a website, owned by a jew, who promotes it is the jew, along with the majority of posters and authors of articles on this site. The subversion, of the western civilization, that is all the negative things that have happened to it, are fully at the hand of the jew.

    Of course you have. By extension, any and all white people who have supported immigration policies or feminist policies, for example, are your cultural enemy. They have turned you into a second class citizen. And you just stated that “race mixing is racial suicide”. So I choose to marry outside of my race, you are calling me out for my personal decision, one that has nothing to do with you. It is abundantly clear you would support the outlawing or restricting of that choice.

    But anyone who has promoted immigration and feminism is, the direct enemy of the western civilization. You again, either as a member of the ideologically subverted, the shabbos goy or hook noses, will continue to promote that which is destroying western civilization as good hence why I call you ‘blinkered’, if of course, you are of course a member of the first category. Whom you choose to have relations with, is entirely your prerogative but there are always going to be consequences when that choice brings harm to the nation you belong to, just as the choice of buggering children does to the paedophile. This is what you fail to see. With choice comes consequence. By bringing in mixed race children, you bring someone in who belongs to neither nation and one who is a threat to both by their existence. They will either choose one or the other, but never both, because ultimately, they will see that miscegenation, by default, destroys both nations, through the creation of something completely new, just as mixing paint colours does. Mixing red and blue makes purple, a completely new colour. The red and the blue are no longer in existence because of it. Those who do not realize that miscegenation is racial suicide are just stupid. You clearly are as you see no fault in it.

    Lol, no. The mixing of the races has been going on for centuries. It just happens to be more prominent now.

    And it is MORE prominent now (read out of control) courtesy of MASS IMMIGRATION, which is the policy of the jew to destroy the nations they inhabit. By flooding nations with immigrants, it destroys social cohesion amongst the nation. Other than racial problems that occur, it allows race acts to be created to subjugate the host nation members. Then of course, it creates economical hardship – more immigrants = less competition for jobs = lower wages. More immigrants = more people = more housing needed = rise in the cost of rent and housing. Thus we have a lowering of the standard of living and rise in the cost of living. If no immigrants were coming into the west, there would be no race mixing in it, due to lack of immigrants to mix with. You really do not see this obvious point.

    A false premise by which you rely on confirmation bias to drive home the narrative. That already has been clearly established.

    Again, this statement brings people to wonder if you’re more jew/shabbos goyim, than ideologically subverted. No one can be as ignorant as you Corvinus.

    Labor camps and death camps. Why should the Jews have been rounded up—taken from their homes by Nazis—in the first place, especially child…

    This is where I end this Corvinus.
    I really have no desire in going into the reason WHY jews were rounded up and put into work camps as part of the German war effort. You need to read history, but not those from the jewish owned historians, who parrot one another to gain brownie points for their jew handlers.
    It is pointless conversing with you.
    You simply will not see the reality if that is you are simply one of the ideologically subverted. And if you are a jew/shabbos goy, then I’m just banging my head against a brick wall.

    Nothing more to be said.
    I have no option but to put you on ignore Corvinus.
    You have absolutely nothing, whatsoever, to contribute. You’d go down a hoot on any Guardian, BBC, CNN forum though. They’d love you there.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  341. @Tony massey

    They never went to the moon Tony.
    Lee Harvey was a Marxist patsy of the jew, killed by the jew mafia, because he stupidly decided to play along with their little game. He just didn’t expect Jack Ruby. Michael King was an awful man and another patsy of the jew, completely controlled by them and given his rise to fame also by them, as a plagiarist and someone who had no intelligence at all, getting into university solely because of his skin colour and the qualifications also. He didn’t have the intelligence to boil an egg, but he parroted what the jew wanted incredibly well.
    As for all the stuff found, as stated, far more higher civilizations, whom I believe were wiped out by the very same bloodlines, doing precisely so again, to this population. The world wakes up. They know that they’ve been rustled and have to implement drastic, draconian actions to shut them up…permanently. This genocide has happened over and over again. After all, the best way to keep yourself and family safe is to destroy your enemies.
    What’s happening is pretty much on par with ‘The Krikkit Wars’ as written about in Douglas Adams’ ‘The Hitch Hikers Guide to the Galaxy’ series of books.
    The jew knows, very well that people have their number and this time, it’s make or break. They either succeed, completely, or they fail terribly. Failure will result in their complete subjugation or worse, extermination. People have had enough. They know this, hence the current drastic action.

  342. Anon[382] • Disclaimer says:
    @GeneralRipper

    I admit that whites have many remarkable achievements. However the bogus lunar landing program (aka NASA MOONS AMERICA) is probably the worst example you could select. If you think spending billions of dollars to fly to a desolate sterile rock for a photo op is a great achievement, then perhaps you aim too low in life.

    Once you accept that we never landed men there and it was all an elaborate front to develop first strike capable ICBM rockets to wage nuclear war, then you will understand you’ve been duped.

    In fact, the only winners from this scam were Jews like Henry Kissinger who orchestrated the deception and the Jewish financiers who collect interest on the ballooning national debt to pay for this project and for the entire Pentagram budget. The banksters are the only ones who benefit from an arms race.

    The Jewish powermongers depend on foolish fatuous whites like you to promote their lucrative deceptions. Now don’t you feel smart and special?

    • Agree: Ben Sampson
    • Replies: @Ben Sampson
  343. @Andreas

    The divisive Jew blamers will have their souls cracked on the alter of the Black Bull.

    Andreas the (((eternal innocent victim))):

    DO YOU OBJECT TO “HOLOCAUST DENIERS” BEING THROWN IN PRISON?

    Spare us the (((gaslighting))), just answer the question.

  344. @Corvinus

    Corvinus the (((hasbara troll))):

    Why should the Jews have been rounded up—taken from their homes by Nazis—in the first place, especially children and the elderly? How was it legal to deny free men the right to contest their detainment?

    You’re free to promote the Official Infallible Jewish Version of WWII History.

    As we all know, others are not free to rebut you.

    DO YOU OBJECT TO “HOLOCAUST DENIERS” BEING THROWN IN PRISON?

    Spare us the (((gaslighting))), just answer the question.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  345. Corvinus says:
    @Pat Kittle

    “Corvinus the (((hasbara troll))):”

    Right on cue, Pat. It’s truly a sickness–anyone who dares to question your narrative, they are labeled in that fashion. But I get it, as it absolves you from engaging in critical thinking.

    “You’re free to promote the Official Infallible Jewish Version of WWII History.”

    No, I am promoting truth. Why do you conveniently avoid the two fundamental questions? It is well documented that Jews were rounded up by brute force, with children and the elderly being manhandled in the process. Do you approve of such methods being employed against a free people? What exactly did a five-year old boy, or an 82-year-old do exactly to be treated in that manner?

    “Spare us the (((gaslighting)))”

    You doth project too much.

    “DO YOU OBJECT TO “HOLOCAUST DENIERS” BEING THROWN IN PRISON?”

    Is it not up to sovereign nations, and the people who reside in that country, make those decisions, especially those in Europe, which have different notions about free speech?

    I for one welcome the Holocaust deniers concerted misinformation efforts in the States. So, no, they are not to be thrown in prison, as that would be in violation of our 1st Amendment.

    There have been no prosecutions of Holocaust deniers in the United States, although Mel Mermelstein, a southern California businessman who was a Holocaust survivor, in 1980 sued the Institute for Historical Review for breach of contract, after the institute offered \$50,000 for proof that any Jews were gassed at Auschwitz. He provided documents, but the institute had refused to pay him. After a state judge took judicial notice of the Holocaust as a fact beyond reasonable dispute, the case settled out of court in Mermelstein’s favor.

    • Replies: @Pat Kittle
  346. I stopped half-way through, so maybe I missed it, but…

    From what I read, Jews have absolutely no connection with any of this. Certainly they weren’t mentioned.

    It must be nice to get a guaranteed pass.

  347. Corvinus says:
    @White Elephant

    “The subversion, of the western civilization, that is all the negative things that have happened to it, are fully at the hand of the jew.”

    You’ve been conditioned to believe that lie.

    “But anyone who has promoted immigration and feminism is, the direct enemy of the western civilization”

    So you do admit, after all, that you do call out people for the choices that they make. That was a good first step, in a long series of them, for you.

    “By bringing in mixed race children, you bring someone in who belongs to neither nation and one who is a threat to both by their existence.”

    That simply is not true.

    “If no immigrants were coming into the west, there would be no race mixing in it, due to lack of immigrants to mix with”

    No, there still would be race mixing, given our already extensive population of non-whites.

    “No one can be as ignorant as you Corvinus.”

    You continue to project.

    Now, I get why you avoided answering these questions, as honest responses based on actual history are devastating to holocaust denier. It shakes you to your core–Why should the Jews have been rounded up—taken from their homes by Nazis—in the first place, especially children and the elderly? How was it legal to deny free men the right to contest their detainment? Moreover, how do you account for the tens of thousands of Jews and non-Jews (Germans, Poles, Russians) with their lucid descriptions of those places? Is each person lying directly or indirectly? How are you able to tell for EACH PERSON?

    “You have absolutely nothing, whatsoever, to contribute”

    More like you are rabidly dedicated to remain a slave to confirmation bias. Alas, I’m afraid you are too far gone to realize you have been flim flammed.

    • Replies: @Pat Kittle
  348. @anarchyst

    “One fly in the ointment is that most blacks on the African continent HATE American blacks as American blacks do bring their dysfunctional behaviors and attitudes to native African blacks.

    The blacks that were exported to other countries as slaves were not the “best and brightest” but were the dregs of their respective societies. Village chiefs would routinely sell off their criminals, troublemakers, and dull-witted retards for “trinkets and baubles”…a win-win situation for the village chiefs and the slave traders, but a giant future liability to any country they were exported to.”

    to the extent that any of that is true, it will give in time as nothing is forever and is always changed by existential need, especially if and when class relations are mitigated or changed basically in favor of ordinary folk

    All of this is side argument, inaccurate approach, is misdirected argument, as if the status quo is good and positive and must continue as it is good and not the cause of all human suffering, is not the grisly eminence of our existential piece

    I went to school…classes in which participation counted for 40% of marks and I was the only Black student and the teacher was bent on keeping me shut down, in which my orientation was left and popular and no one else’s was.

    I used to compare marks for basically the same work that never got full consideration and a wide and lesser range over several teachers.

    I found an array of punishment around the education process for me as a Black person, that made me realize that the punitive process is an ongoing and creative thing… the keeping down of Black students

    however what are we talking about? a structure that is arrayed against Black excellence that nevertheless did not and does not stop Black achievement, just makes of it what you are able to claim is of such a standard of inferior quality it can be used to judge all Blacks as inferior to whites.

    as we see this cannot be truthful accurate representation of the abilities of both groups at all due what actually goes that process: the actual policing of one group of students by the next and its administrative structure

    all of this will yield positively to the end of capitalism and its elitist class structure. that is the correct approach, the point, goal and absolute need by ordinary people. your approach is absolutely useless as far as I can tell, a misdirection and poor consumption of crucial human time

  349. @Anon

    I cannot say it better! Brilliant!

    • Replies: @Mevashir
  350. sb says:
    @Antiochus

    I’ve heard that the Australians are now conducting experiments on children in these concentration camps and have been rounding up identical twins with this in mind .What these experiments are about is so far unknown .
    Of course all of the Australian media are prohibited from even mentioning any of this on pain of being sent to these camps themselves .

  351. anarchyst says:
    @Ben Sampson

    Your statement:

    I went to school…classes in which participation counted for 40% of marks and I was the only Black student and the teacher was bent on keeping me shut down, in which my orientation was left and popular and no one else’s was.

    …is amazing. According to your claim, you must have had one of the only intolerant “right-wing” professors who actively denigrated your left-wing attitude.

    How could your “left-wing orientation” be popular if no one else’s in the class was?

    You have a racial chip on your shoulder that is doing you no good.

    Almost everyone has run into an intolerant jerk professor in his educational path, most being leftist professors who do not tolerate right-wing points of view and openly state as such.

    Throughout life, you are going to run into people who do not like you for a various number of reasons, not all of them invalid.

    As a white male, I have run into many situations where my “worth” for a particular position was not only questioned, but denied. Black “affirmative action” policies denied me many positions that, based solely on merit, should have been mine. In many cases, honest hiring managers informed me that they were looking for a “person of color”. I didn’t cry or wallow in self-pity (such as you are doing to yourself, blaming your racial makeup), but instead, brushed myself off and went on the the next challenge.

    You, my friend, should look at yourself retrospectively and do the same.

    You will be a better person for it.

    Regards,

    • Replies: @Ben Sampson
  352. Adûnâi says: • Website
    @Dr. Robert Morgan

    > “All parties involved saw the path to empire as somehow benefiting themselves, and there was no lobby by whites to keep N. America exclusively for their own race.”

    The issue with this line of thinking is that you assume the subject of history to possess a certain unalterable, inherent value system. Marxism views monetary interest as such a paramount guiding force, and your idea appears roughly the same? Because that is clearly wrong, and doesn’t mesh well with any cultural reading of history. “Benefit” here can mean different things to different cultures – and in this case, it clearly means neither “blood” nor “efficiency”, but simply the completion of the Christian dogma, down to a T (“the last shall be the first”). In what world can the American élite be seen as protecting their own interests if they are being dissolved genetically?

    > “It’s also good you bring up Europe’s situation, because it’s very similar in that European whites are also not really standing up for their own blood and soil.”

    1. The main European power, Germany, was destroyed in 1945 in a war of arms.
    2. The peripheral European power, Russia, was destroyed in 1991 in a war of ideas.
    3. The remnants of Eastern Europe were neutred by the NATO drive to the east.
    4. There also used to be France, but culturally, it was ridiculously weak, being the centre of the revolution and all. So much so that while it was the second greatest settler colonial empire, it allowed the Algerian savages to murder their own people. It wasn’t without a push-back, however – the Judaeo-Christian de Gaulle had to slaughter up to 100k fascists in 1944-45, and in 1962, was almost assassinated by the OAS-sympathising Jean Bastien-Thiry.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Épuration_légale
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Organisation_armée_secrète
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jean_Bastien-Thiry

    In a way, Europe doesn’t exist politically (aside from Russia-Belarus) or culturally (not even those). So blaming them is a moot point. However, especially in Eastern Europe, old hatreds are still smoldering below the surface, and they can be reanimated – provided the demise of America comes soon enough. Preferably a eucatastrophic one, to devastate the very foundations of the hyper-Christian order.

  353. @anarchyst

    you are entitled to your own opinion, or your own propaganda – whichever it actually is

    • Replies: @anarchyst
  354. But look at more examples of self governing…of the people participating directly in their process…and in the case of the native people actually live governing their own section of the nation

    https://www.counterpunch.org/2021/12/03/canada-the-bad-neighbor/

    And also a nation that abhors its own independence besides itself in impatience to give it away…has already indeed given it away! Canada.

  355. anarchyst says:
    @Ben Sampson

    …as are you.

    Best regards,

  356. @RockaBoatus

    Thanks BK, you never fail to expose my ‘conspiratorial’ side! How could one ever reach the conclusion that Jews disproportionately influence, manipulate and in some instances even control entire U.S. industries and institutions?!

    After all, it’s not like the Jews control the media, right?It’s not like they possess enough power and influence to silence, persecute, and un-person anyone who dares to publicly challenge or deny the Holocaust, right?

    To even suggest that Jews might control or influence the media’s narrative on most if not all criticism of Jews and Israel is absurd, right? How crazy to think that highly intelligent Jews would find it necessary to even do such things is bizarre to say the least!

    And to engage in highly improbable ‘conspiracy theories’ that Jews disproportionately influence and manipulate America’s foreign policies, especially those related to Israel, has got to be rated along with the faked moon landing and the flat earth theories!

    But as they say, ‘Haters are gonna hate.’ Thank you again, Sir, for setting me straight about my outlandish notions.

  357. @Corvinus

    (((Corvinus the gaslighting hasbara troll))):

    I repeatedly ask you (((trolls))):

    DO YOU OBJECT TO “HOLOCAUST DENIERS” BEING THROWN IN PRISON?

    Spare us the (((gaslighting))), just answer the question.

    (((You))) clearly approve of “Holocaust deniers” being thrown into prison, so (((you))) opted for (((gaslighting))) instead of honestly answering the question.

    Don’t pretend (((you))) give a crap about the White goyim, (((shyster))).

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  358. Adûnâi: ““Benefit” here can mean different things to different cultures – and in this case, it clearly means neither “blood” nor “efficiency”, but simply the completion of the Christian dogma, down to a T (“the last shall be the first”).”

    Whether the Roman model of building empire by assimilating the conquered (both culturally and genetically) will continue to be efficient or not is what remains to be determined. Though the American empire may founder, it has done pretty well so far, at least in terms of material success and military dominance.

    Adûnâi: “In what world can the American élite be seen as protecting their own interests if they are being dissolved genetically?”

    Whites generally appear to place a very low value on racial integrity. The majority always have. Maybe half of this today is Christian morality, but the other half is technological, and of course it’s a mindset now found in abundance here at the world’s technological center. As the white race is reshaped by technology (including techniques of empire, such as the aforementioned genetic assimilation), this is in principle no different than the genetic modifications salivated over by right-wing transhumanists. It’s a dispute among technicians, both as to the goal and the means to attain it. One dreams of creating a utopia by changing white genetics to make an Übermensch, the other dreams of utopia as a perfect panmixia of extant humanity. Neither has much use for the white race as it is.

  359. GeneralRipper [AKA "Nemo me impune lacessit"] says:
    @Ben Sampson

    Wow! Another long winded negro Communist who loves to hear himself talk.

    They’re rare as hen’s teeth these days.

    The Darkies in America need to be liberated from da white mans rule n’ shit!

    Is that why you people follow us wherever we go?

    I have always said that the greatest punishment for useful idiot Leftists, is for them to eventually get everything they want. At least what they think they want.

    That rule applies even more so to blacks.

    • Replies: @Ben Sampson
  360. @HT

    Yes, I think you have a good point.

    While it is the responsibility of the citizenry to pay attention, the unsuspecting public is at a huge disadvantage.

    The population has been deliberately misled by the Jew / CIA controlled media. Propaganda works!

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  361. Corvinus says:
    @Pat Kittle

    I clearly answered your question.

    I for one welcome the Holocaust deniers concerted misinformation efforts in the States. So, no, they are not to be thrown in prison, as that would be in violation of our 1st Amendment.

    The only gaslighter here is you.

    • Replies: @Pat Kittle
  362. Corvinus says:
    @Ralph B. Seymour

    “The population has been deliberately misled by the Jew / CIA controlled media”

    Lol, no. Millions of whites have made their own decisions about race and culture on their own behalf. We have high IQs and high time preferences. That’s beyond a shatter of a doubt.

  363. GeneralRipper [AKA "Nemo me impune lacessit"] says:
    @Corvinus

    Millions of whites have made their own decisions about race and culture on their own behalf.

    LOL

    Millions of whites who have been thoroughly indoctrinated in Leftist public schools and universities, and who sit in front of the TV every day, make the same mistakes over and over again because they’re too stupid, greedy and cowardly to do otherwise.

    That would be you.

    • Agree: Boomthorkell
    • Replies: @Boomthorkell
    , @Corvinus
  364. @GeneralRipper

    Still morally culpable for their poor and immoral choices, but it’s hard to blame peasants and status-obsessed upper-class types when they have such poor models and sources of information.

    Truly, the blind (or damned) leading the blind.

  365. @Corvinus

    ” Millions of whites who have been thoroughly indoctrinated in Leftist public schools and universities, and who sit in front of the TV every day, make the same mistakes over and over again because they’re too stupid, greedy and cowardly to do otherwise. ”

    that’s what I have been trying to say all along!

  366. @Corvinus

    (((Corvinus))): the laughable gaslighting hasbara troll))):

    For obvious reasons, (((you hasbara trolls))) fear this simple question:

    DO YOU OBJECT TO “HOLOCAUST DENIERS” BEING THROWN IN PRISON?

    (((You))) desperately refuse to simply reply “Yes” or “No.”

    Instead, you comically try to slime out of replying “Yes” or “No.”

    (((Your squirming))) will be a source of amusement from now on, because that question is NOT going to ever go away!
    🙂
    Run that by (((your hasbara superiors))) so we can amuse ourselves with how (((they))) order (((you))) to evade the question in the future.
    🙂

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  367. @Corvinus

    Now, I get why you avoided answering these questions, as honest responses based on actual history are devastating to holocaust denier.

    (((Corvinus the hasbara troll))):

    Look (((who)))’s “avoided answering questions”!
    🙂
    (((YOU))) won’t answer this simple “Yes” or “No” question:

    DO YOU OBJECT TO “HOLOCAUST DENIERS” BEING THROWN IN PRISON?

    (((You))) obviously do NOT object, but (((you))) don’t dare admit it!
    🙂

  368. Mevashir says:
    @Ben Sampson

    I had to submit that comment numerous times before the censoring software let it pass. This is one of the reasons I am terminating my involvement with this site. I have requested numerous times that Unz offer a subscription service whereby we can comment unhindered by fear of censorship, but so far no response.

    I lived in South Africa for a number of years. After a while I started to view my white skin as something abnormal and defective. This was simply the result of riding taxis and otherwise interacting with the 90% majority black population. I started to develop a theory that for white people the lack of melanin pigment in their skin affects their behavior in some mysterious way. It seems clear that in very general terms white people are more intellectual and detached while darker colored people are more emotional.

    Something else I’ve noticed is that while blacks will commit a lot of crime such as robberies vandalism and even gang murders, I can’t think of a single black mass shooter. Those psychopaths seem to be strictly the domain of white people. And that would support my thesis that white people are heavy on the intellect and deficient in the realm of feelings and emotions which ends up driving psychopathic behavior such as mass murder and serial killings. I think almost all of those perps are white.

    We should all remember that according to science skin color is simply a function of climate. The skin creates vitamin D through the sun. In very hot climates people are pigmented that acts as a kind of shield against excessive sunlight and its damaging UV radiation. In colder climates where the sun is weaker people are less pigmented to allow more sun penetration of their skin to ensure adequate production of vitamin D. But in all cases — white yellow red brown and black — the point is to provide the optimum amount of sunlight to enhance human health and prevent destructive UV radiation.

    Given that, I wonder if darker pigmented people are affected biochemically in some way to have warmer and more joyous personalities. From my experiences in life I think it is true. How about you?

    (IT IS ALSO POSSIBLE THAT GIVEN THE GREATER CHALLENGES OF LIVING IN COLDER CLIMATES, THE LIGHT SKIN PEOPLE RESIDING THERE EVOLVED TO A HIGHER LEVEL OF INTELLIGENCE IN ORDER TO SURVIVE THE MORE DIFFICULT ENVIRONMENTAL STRESSES. BUT I STILL BELIEVE THAT THE LIGHT SKIN COLOR TENDS TO IMPAIR THEIR EMOTIONS AND LEAVE THEM DANGLING IN THE REALM OF HYPER INTELLECTUALISM. AN EXAMPLE IS WESTERN PHILOSOPHY, WITH ITS ABSTRUSE IN CONVOLUTED THOUGHT CONSTRUCTS THAT SEEMED COMPLETELY DETACHED FROM THE REALITY OF HUMAN EMOTIONS AND NEEDS. THIS IS ALMOST TOTALLY THE DOMAIN OF WHITE PEOPLE.)

    • Replies: @Ben Sampson
  369. @GeneralRipper

    This a space made for talk Iaccesshi… the more there is the happier the publishers.

    If you can glean out the point of my comment and beat it up, agree with it, or pass it on your way elsewhere.

    There is not a snit of value in you comment above, a vacuous opinion and a waste of notice

    Here is white Elephant with nonsense you should have found a tremendous source development for your rep on this site but you ignore it completely. which means you agree with the idiocy.

    ” You do realise that people are not only NOT black, as it’s an impossible skin pigmentation and all are merely shades of browny-pink but also race is measured through cranial shape? There is even an article on here to prove that they can tell whether organs are from a black, white, Asian etc?

    You do also understand that it has been proven, although hidden from the public (for obvious reasons) that Europeans did not come from blacks? This can be found on the internet.

    You do realise that anyone who comes out to prove just so, they are ridiculed, vilified and driven from their careers?”

    Then he goes on with all sorts of claims that Ian Plimer for eg, an Australian geologist, totally qualified, exquisitely professional, experienced, been around a long time, refutes.

    Plimer instead establishes an outlook that does indeed attack the established outlook though not consistent with what White Elephant thinks would get such as Plimer professionally mutilated, even killed, destroyed

    Look again! White Elephant establishes that the Black skin is impossible! What on earth could he mean by that then eh? You accessit, could have speculated on that all day long.

    if White Elephant does mean negative we do know that the Black skin is the most facile of all human skin in earth’s sundrenched environmental set up. warm…the only condition that could have given rise to life. White Elephant says that that is impossible! If it is, or was, then a god came and started it with its own hands, giving it it’s ‘browny-pink’ skin that somehow looks utterly, deeply Black among the oldest human types around. They can tell the age of the oldest human groups too! and none of them are ‘browny-pink, whatever the hell that is! Interesting!

    long winded eh! I love it – to be long winded. I would put my writing to you tube and they would do the rest. I was losing my ability to talk, ‘stricturized’ into You tube lines of literary limitation, unable to create, labelling every creation wrong, correcting then…would not even allow inverted commas to pass a word. Oh bwoy!

    I mean I disagree with White Elephant’s nonsensical browny-pink, relative to the subject matter, but I love his creation of a term. I am gonna talk man! flow when I comment as best I can! Don’t read…the choice is your own to do so or not

    • Replies: @GeneralRipper
  370. Theoretical propositions are always welcome. Sometimes things that make one think are good.

  371. Anonymous[396] • Disclaimer says:
    @Wake up

    Hilarious that he said White people created crazy stuff like there is no race and other critical race theory stuff when it was the tribe who created it

  372. GeneralRipper [AKA "Nemo me impune lacessit"] says:
    @Ben Sampson

    I am gonna talk man! flow when I comment as best I can!

    Blizzard of bullshit.

    Don’t read…the choice is your own to do so or not

    I don’t.

    • Replies: @Ben Sampson
  373. @Ben Sampson

    “all of this will yield positively to the end of capitalism and its elitist class structure. that is the correct approach, the point, goal and absolute need by ordinary people. your approach is absolutely useless as far as I can tell, a misdirection and poor consumption of crucial human time”

    Poor consumption of human time?? Shitfire you fool! There’s more time remaining to solve Covid, climate change, all other forms of environmental degradation than there is to solve the White Man’s Burden. Piss on your blatherings about Capitalism and other economic, social and political systems. At the end of the day, whatever arguments can be made (pro or con) about these systems are moot, as there are finite resources, no matter the systems used to administer the shit show.

    Quite simply, your tribe constitutes a net degradation of the resources (both human and material) in America (and most any civilized place where it is allowed to run rampant) and there is not enough evolutionary time remaining to bring it up to some sort of functional speed.

    • Replies: @Ben Sampson
  374. @GeneralRipper

    you read and responded to this. No more then?

    The idiot is you you unfriendly, likely racist ‘impse’, in need of a civilizational lesson

  375. @Mevashir

    My immediate response is that humans are the way we are as result of the experience we have lived from the start to now. Dialectical as life is there were many options but we lived what we chose in response to need…directed and so our history.

    we did not know but now we do. we are human, of the materials of the earth, universe etc. as such we are changeable to the nth degree in al aspects of existence or life. so whatever we are at this point, the result of our general cultural/social experience over can now be consciously changed over time by social manipulation

    [MORE]

    and when I say social manipulation I mean by simple response to the demands of life up to the level we have proved and can anticipate by analysis into the future, increasing knowledgeable and technical skill as we go.

    so far the major drive of behavior is social exploitation: the exploitation of the majority by the few. that is what has set up the human behavioral matrix as it as in addition to weather/environmental condition. the cold has had a more severe impact on human personality, helping to produce all Mevashir lists about whites.

    but that can change…and will change if the popular revolution takes place and ordinary people rise up and begin to run society in the general interest, creating really democratic forms of social organization to facilitate that that do not flow from abstract philosophies but from racial reality.

    we must have general full social participation in the running nd development of society because it is essential for social and practical. literal survival of society for the process to be run that way. if there is no majority participatory governing then there is minority and the social relations develop that way leading to what we have now…ultimately the genocide attempted by the minority to protect their social control

    if the majority dominates then the social structure reflect such control and the whole behavioral structure of society come to reflect that way of life in the general confidence of all the people and forms on behavior based on complete social confidence. that will in time eliminate all contrary behaviors that flowed from exploitative, imperial societies in the full development

    but I got a full day ahead of me no time…will get back to this later. there is nothing written in stone about humanity all and everything can change and will change anyway into one of the potentials that exists on any and all days we are alive in the universe. we must be able to become that which is entirely consistent with our indefinite survival. that’s the point! we must discover what that means all the time and effect it in order to go on and on

    some one nearby said that regardless… what humans refer to as existential resources on which our survival is based will run out anyway…its all finite! Really?

    Interesting! I don’t see that that is the case at all. I have seen ‘science which argues that there is much that is infinite…..

    but the time frames are relatively long indeed and in the process human life is directed by the need to the effort and development of life to survival indefinitely. if successful we will survive a very long time relatively and by that time who knows what would be involved. our time and job describes our job and existential respnsibility…to survive and to make the life better for us and our families communities nations etc. In out time the rest will take are of itself

    later

    • Replies: @Mevashir
  376. @Jim Bob Lassiter

    Check Mavashir above! He will help mightily to remove the shades from your eyes so you can see your people accurately…and the rest of humanity same way

    you will also see that there are no tribes just one human species. and in that process I am your mother and father!

    and see too that in your general ignorance and existential planetary violence, stealing, enslavement of others, mass murders, war, war, war! and genocides etc., etc., etc., from whom the real human existential degradation flows!!!

  377. Mevashir says:
    @Ben Sampson

    Ben, I had a tough time following you. I was hoping you would comment on the possible biological effect of having more or less melanin skin pigmentation in one’s body.

    Generally I agree with you that people pretty much have equal potential. I think most of the black criminal problems Taylor and many commenters worry about is due to poverty and growing up in fatherless households. However, we should not under-rate the genuine fear this behavior inspires and the danger it poses to the rest of society.

    I think there are two deep rooted problems that plague the American black community:

    1. Already mentioned by a commenter is the fact that most Africans who were sold into slavery (with the complicity of Muslim slave traders and African tribal chieftains) were from the dregs of society. Not long ago two black scholars in a South African university published a statistical study showing that the IQ of slave ancestors was measurably lower than average. They were forced to resign their positions due to the outcry! But I suspect this is one major factor in the underperformance of African Americans.

    2. The second factor is that the slaves were “emancipated” without any financial compensation. All those Christian abolitionists seem to have overlooked the passages in Exodus describing the great wealth that the liberated Hebrew slaves took with them out of Egypt. African American slaves were liberated with the clothes on their backs and no financial compensation at all. Not only that, but Lincoln deliberately denied them access to the Homestead Act (40 acres and a mule) that was open to whites. The “great emancipator” was in reality a great devastator and betrayer of the liberated slaves. He also withdrew Union forces from the South thereby failing to protect the black population from revenge attacks by whites whose society had been destroyed by the Union armies. Lincoln is a good example of how doing a second rate job ends up making the whole situation much worse.

    When I lived in North Carolina I was told that American blacks suffer under an ongoing curse of a slave mentality. It seems that native Africans (like Obama) do much better than African Americans with their long legacy of slavery and oppression. I don’t know how this problem can be remedied. The fatherless ghetto kids are a huge menace to society. All the investment in education makes no difference if they return home every day to a wasteland. The biblical view would say to simply exterminate the ghettos as tragically irremediable and unredeemable and an enormous waste of society’s human and financial resources.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  378. Ben, I had a tough time following you”

    Thanks for persevering.

    I may not have the time to comment on the rest of the post right now but I have addressed most of it already. let’s see then:
    you are not seeing accurately the cause of the problematic state of the whole society as capitalism, and our arrival at its final stage and that society is in a state of transformation from capitalism either to popular democratic revolution of depopulated Brave New World

    It’s as if life will soon be back the way it was and that Black life will be the problem white people think is posing a danger to society as a whole. We are all in social transformation and your blindness on this issue is more dangerous to society than any petty criminal issue posed by Black people.

    revolutionary popular democracy addresses all social problems or ordinary people including the Black problems. and it will exposes to you that your impression of the causes of what you see as the Black problem are limited…cause and the difficulties it has made for Black people

    “I think most of the black criminal problems Taylor and many commenters worry about is due to poverty and growing up in fatherless households. However, we should not under-rate the genuine fear this behaviour inspires and the danger it poses to the rest of society.”

    That is quite inaccurate as far as I see: not fatherless homes per se…although that cannot help- but what causes fatherless homes and a vast more negative impact on Black life – the long history of slavery and racism and general economic exploitation, blockage from rising out of poverty. and that financial blockage affects most Americans the same as well for capitalism has been bent on keeping ordinary people poor…now more than ever with massive austerity programs

    [MORE]

    White people are also fearful of the consequences of their depraved treatment of Black people for so long and as clearly seen in the way you described that quote above the racism is still strong, and you could quite well be playing propaganda games with your comment above as well

    however as I keep pointing out there must be a replacement of the social principle that dominates society from the minority rich to the ordinary majority which when dominant would bring social confidence to all of society all ordinary people who would be in charge of their society setting it up in the collective interest creating themselves the governing structures that would in time shape everyone’s personality and behaviour into positive social compliance because the society has become their s and provides for all the best possible on any and all days

    You do not appear to understand society! Your belief structure, ideology holds static principles as the way life is. Belief is your way, principles of good and bad as biblical philosophical etc.

    Nothing is permanent. From the second life began it has never stopped, and stopped changing, transforming, evolving. and by that I mean the entire life we are a part of the world, the universe and all it is. I do not know if it even began, if it has not been forever going and its massive dialectical natures and content. we must work our our way through to win survival indefinitely

    And what is good is not ideas but what is consistent with human survival in the existential process, that we discover and can apply it successfully to our life to enhance our life and chances in nature… what will keep us going and going….

    We evolved in ignorance. we must come to know or we won’t make it. Our knowledge skills must advance accordingly at rates commensurate with the general evolution we are part of so we can deal with the issues that challenge our existence. General truth is the greatest human tool! We must know reality and live by it. The more we prove and the more we can use it to improve life the more certain we will go on.

    That is the principle of ordinary interest in life….the ordinary people. You do not appear to be aware of that fact. Truth is not in the interest of the rich because of how they got to be elites, at the top of society…Exploitation and crimes against humanity. You Mevashir are worried about the impact of petty Black crime on society…what about Covid! What about the massive wars imposed on the world for 80 straight years now after the second world war…another massive war that took millions of lives.

    Where do you see Black people consuming so many human lives on this planet?

    The truth will set us free…like the world that would save humanity requires the very democracy that ordinary people must create if we are to survive. If we succeed we would make a magnificent world full of educated and advance people who will ultimately create the means to travel outside of the planet

    That is the idea I have been trying to develop. That is why I have been speaking about the Hungarian revolution of 1956 in which the Hungarian people, fully aware of this, tossed the political parties and proceeded to take over society and run it themselves, to create the popular structure that would include the direct participation of all the people in the national decision making.

    THEN THEY ASKED THE WORLD TO PROTECT THEM FROM THE RUSSIANS BECAUSE THEY KNOW THE ELITIST ‘BOLLSHIES’ WOULD NOT BE ABLE TO TOLERATE A DEMOCRATIC NATION AT THEIR DOORSTEP THAT THEY USED TO CONTROL

    But of course the Bolsheviks smashed them and put back in the old tyrants that he people overthrew

    This is what all you racists do not understand. You believe in a world that does not exist. You have ideas that are totally wrong. those who attack my anti capitalism here….who are they rich men? if they are not if they are ordinary their existential interest is incompatible with the capitalists. Race is not the basic principle of functioning of society but class. The top class has all the money and they stole it. the only way we can get it back, win any chance at all to guarantee our survival is to get it back…the money and the control of the economic process by which we live

    To get it back we must eliminate the rich elite class. and they know this. They are fully aware that that is the basic, fundamental social divide that ultimately cannot be resolved save by the elimination of one class by the next…THE RICH BY THE POOR OR THE POOR BY THE RICH! THERE IS NO ALTERNATIVE. That is how society has evolved to this point. The rich are going to kill as many of the poor as they deem they must. And those who are allowed to remain they are going to engineer into inability to harm the rich ever again

    That’s it! That is what they are doing now as the time has come. And the damn fools here who attacked me on this thread here the rich have a noose for them too. they are living in a dream, living a consciousness that is totally opposed to their own best interest as ordinary people

    The current socially transformative process is basic…we will end up in a generation either in full popular democracy and society thriving: or in a form of a Brave new world in which most of the ordinary people have been killed off, the rest engineered and human in physical shape only… have been made into some kind of idiot capable only of what the elites want of them by way of labour

    So I have given my answer to what you had hoped to get from me. There it is…

    .

  379. Corvinus says:
    @GeneralRipper

    Thanks for your anti-white statement on record. Clearly you want to divide us. How do you expect us to get on board when you maliciously denigrate our kind?

    • Replies: @Pat Kittle
  380. Corvinus says:
    @Pat Kittle

    I clearly answered the question. There is no simple yes or no. Leave it to you to push the default button by which anyone you oppose is a Jew or Jew supporter. Again, it is a sickness on your part.

    • Replies: @Pat Kittle
    , @RossR
  381. Corvinus says:
    @Mevashir

    “Already mentioned by a commenter is the fact that most Africans who were sold into slavery (with the complicity of Muslim slave traders and African tribal chieftains) were from the dregs of society.”

    What commenter? What is their source?

    “Not long ago two black scholars in a South African university published a statistical study showing that the IQ of slave ancestors was measurably lower than average.”

    Who? When? If you’re going to make such a charge, be specific. Citations are required for such claims.

    “The biblical view would say to simply exterminate the ghettos as tragically irremediable and unredeemable and an enormous waste of society’s human and financial resources.”

    Specific citations from the Bible are required to support your statement here. Now, do you even agree with this course of action. Of course, if you believe in what you say, why don’t you take it upon yourself to do God’s work?

    • Replies: @Mevashir
  382. @Corvinus

    (((Corvinus the hasbara Jew troll))), pretending he’s “White”!
    🙂

    Hey Corvy, tell us about the “6 million Whites” again — oy vey!!
    🙂

  383. @Corvinus

    Not all questions can be answered simply “Yes” or “No.”

    This one can:

    DO YOU OBJECT TO “HOLOCAUST DENIERS” BEING THROWN IN PRISON?

    (((You))) say “There is no simple yes or no.”

    Specifically, when is it OK to throw “Holocaust deniers” in prison?

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  384. ronehjr says:
    @Realist

    What a disingenuous statement, that ignores the percentage of jews that run media and academia, and donate to causes antithetical to White interests.

  385. Corvinus says:
    @Pat Kittle

    LOL, you are triggered because I responded succinctly.

    Do not white people have agency, as you claim? Do not white people have liberty, as you claim? Do not white people have freedom of association, as you claim? So, on the basis of YOUR own logic, that is why it is up to sovereign nations, and the free (white) people who reside in that country, to make those decisions, especially those in Europe, which have different notions about free speech. Again, I for one welcome the Holocaust deniers concerted misinformation efforts in the States. So, no, they are not to be thrown in prison, as that would be in violation of our 1st Amendment.

    That is the answer. You do not like the answer framed this way, so like the Jews you hate, you act just like them by trying to control the narrative. Ironic and hypocritical, to say the least.

    Furthermore, why do you conveniently avoid the fundamental questions? It is well documented that Jews were rounded up by brute force, with children and the elderly being manhandled in the process. Do you approve of such methods being employed against a free people? What exactly did a five-year old boy, or an 82-year-old do exactly to be treated in that manner? How do you account for the verified eyewitness testimony of Jews and non-Jews in the labor and concentration camps of the atrocities committed there?

  386. Simple “Yes” or “No” question:
    DO YOU OBJECT TO “HOLOCAUST DENIERS” BEING THROWN IN PRISON?

    (((Your weasel words))):

    sovereign nations… in Europe… have different notions about free speech…. I… welcome the Holocaust deniers… in the States… they are not to be thrown in prison… that would be in violation of our 1st Amendment.

    Obviously you do NOT object to “Holocaust deniers” being imprisoned where it is possible to so.

    Meanwhile, JEWS are striving behind the scenes to make “Holocaust denial” an imprisonable offense in the US as well.

    If (((they))) succeed, (((you))) will obviously not object. You will be reminded of this.
    🙂

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  387. Mevashir says:
    @Corvinus

    “Not long ago two black scholars in a South African university published a statistical study showing that the IQ of slave ancestors was measurably lower than average.”

    Who? When? If you’re going to make such a charge, be specific. Citations are required for such claims.

    https://mg.co.za/article/2019-05-15-author-of-research-linking-slavery-and-intelligence-resigns/
    https://www.iol.co.za/capetimes/news/uct-distances-itself-from-study-on-slavery-intelligence-23182623
    https://www.news24.com/news24/SouthAfrica/News/professor-resigns-from-uct-after-co-authoring-slave-intelligence-paper-20190516
    https://www.timeslive.co.za/news/south-africa/2019-05-16-uct-academic-resigns-over-racist-research/

    https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/93237/1/MPRA_paper_93237.pdf
    Intelligence and Slave Exports from Africa1
    Forthcoming: Journal of Interdisciplinary Economics
    Simplice A. Asongu
    Development Finance Centre
    Graduate School of Business,
    University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
    E-mails: [email protected] /
    [email protected] /
    [email protected]
    Oasis Kodila-Tedika
    University of Kinshasa
    Department of Economics,
    The Democratic Republic of Congo
    E-mail: [email protected]

    • Replies: @Anon
  388. RossR says:
    @Corvinus

    The holocost was proven a lie in 1988 by Fred Leuchter. It was proven through forensics and engineering that nobody was gassed in Auschwitz.

    Fred Leuchter proved forensically that there could have been no hydrocyanic gassings in the rooms exhibited to the world as gas chambers. He removed parts of the wall from the,so called, gas chambers and removed parts of wall from the actual gas chambers which were used to disinfect clothing and bedding in order to stop disease and save lives. He then gave them over to a lab in America on a double blind case (the lab technician did not know where the samples came from and from whom, he just had to analyse their constituents ). The result…. sample from the disinfectant chamber showed a massive amount of Hydrocyanide (Zyklon B)……the sample from the , so called, killing chamber showed nothing but a tiny trace of Hydrocyanide. Case closed.

    Fred Leuchter has patents against his name, he was the only man to build and maintain gas chambers in the American penitentiary system and as Amercia were the only country in the world to execute criminals with lethal gassing it made Fred Leuchter the only expert in the world on human gas chambers.

    The , so called, gas chambers shown to the public today have a wooden door with a window in it and no sealing around it. We are told the zyklon B pellets were thrown down a hole in the roof but had no means of circulating the poison by a circulating fan. No means of exhausting the gas (to allow the removal of bodies without dying of poison gas). No explosion proof lighting or switches. Drains in the floor going directly to the towns sewage, which would have killed everyone in the camp.

    Do the arithmetic. We are told 1 million jews were gassed and then cremated in Auschwitz between 1942 and 45, three years. That is 1,000,000 divided by three = 333,333 per year, divided by 365=913 jews cremated per day. Now with 15 crematoria ovens = 60 in one oven per day, 2.5 bodies per hour, which means it took 24 minutes to cremate 1 body.

    1. Go to any modern crematory and ask how long it takes to cremate a body. ( I did a quick google search and first answer is; between 1and a half and three hours)

    2. Any engineer will tell you that you cannot run an oven built with refractory for three years solid. The refractory breaks down very quickly.

    Your holocaust narrative is ludicrous, as Walter Luftl notes “the holocaust narrative goes against all nature and natural science.”

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  389. Anon[104] • Disclaimer says:
    @Mevashir

    Saying that African slaves had lower IQs than others is really a no-brainer. Even a low-IQ person can comprehend that people who work for Walmart will generally be of lower intelligence than people who attend Harvard Stanford and MIT. Can we be clear-minded about this? We also need to be honest about the complicity of African tribal chiefs and Muslims in the African slave trade.

    Also recall that scholars say that in ancient Greece and Rome slaves comprised 90% of the total population. Many elite jobs were done by slaves, such as tutors and teachers. In the ancient world slavery was decidedly non-racial and purely a function of economic and political power. Except for criminals working in the mines or galleys, slavery was not a bad position in life.

    Apparently it was Judaism and Christianity that introduced the racialist anti-black element of slavery as deriving from the “Curse of Ham’ in Genesis 9, as explained by Farrakhan and Wellesley professor Tony Martin.

    To be fair, I’ve seen photos of African slaves from the pre-Civil War era, and they all seem to dress very respectably, with men in jackets and women in dresses, a very far cry from the ghetto rat culture of today. What has decimated the today’s African-American population is poverty and fatherlessness. This is a breeding ground for the worst forms of anti-social behavior and no amount of money poured into social relief programs will make a bit of difference.

    I would invite the Israelis to take over management of Chicago, by building a wall around southside and letting the IDF do police patrols outside the perimeter. That is the only answer to the problem of black crime and poverty.

    When I was an undergraduate at Harvard, this book was published that explained that the economic circumstances of blacks was measurably superior under slavery than as “freemen”. The author was a Jew married to a black professor wife at University of Chicago, and he explained later that he opposed slavery but wished to clarify why it was so hard to eradicate precisely because the economics of it were so favorable:
    https://www.amazon.com/Time-Cross-Economics-American-Slavery/dp/0393312186
    https://eh.net/book_reviews/time-on-the-cross-the-economics-of-american-negro-slavery/
    https://archive.org/details/timeoncross00robe

    http://WWW.MEVASHIR.HOME.BLOG

    “Re-examine all you have been told… Dismiss what insults your Soul.” Walt Whitman

    • Replies: @Pat Kittle
  390. @Anonymous

    “The Democratic Party, for example, is an alliance of Eastern and Southern European descended people who are practicing the politics of their nations of origin as of about the time of the 1848 revolutions”

    I haven’t heard this one before. The Democratic Party is run by Slavs and Mediterraneans whose politics is what, anti-nationalist Habsburg multiculturalism?

    It’s a shame you’re anonymous and may not even see this reply, as I would like to see this viewpoint expanded upon.

  391. @Anon

    I would invite the Israelis to take over management of Chicago, by building a wall around southside and letting the IDF do police patrols outside the perimeter. That is the only answer to the problem of black crime and poverty.

    Israel for all practical purposes is already running Chicago, but we goyim sure appreciate (((your generous offer))).

    How could we get along without (((you)))?

    • Replies: @Anon
  392. Anon[292] • Disclaimer says:
    @Pat Kittle

    You couldn’t get along without the Jews. They own everything important in your life, your home your car your college education, everything via their international banking syndicates. So suck it up and try to enjoy your slavery.

    • Troll: Corvinus
    • Replies: @Anon
    , @Pat Kittle
  393. Corvinus says:
    @RossR

    Leuchter cited the absence of Prussian blue in the homicidal gas chambers to support his view that they could not have been used to gas people. However, residual iron-based cyanide compounds are not a categorical consequence of cyanide exposure. By not discriminating against that, Leuchter introduced an unreliable factor into his experiment, and his findings were seriously flawed as a result.

    • Replies: @Anon Anon
    , @RossR
    , @geokat62
    , @RossR
  394. Anon Anon says:
    @Corvinus

    Do you really think that if the narrative was completely true that there’d wouldn’t be any after multiple gassings nearly every day for over one year?

  395. RossR says:
    @Corvinus

    A wooden door without any sealant , with a window and a keyhole ,which opened in the way? Drains in the middle of the floor going into the towns mains? No extraction fans to get rid of the gas?

    Prussian blue stains going right through the brickwork of the pesticide gas chambers but none in the “jew gas chambers”. Explain!

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  396. geokat62 says:
    @Corvinus

    Corvy, Corvy, Corvy.

    Why not provide proper attribution for the quote you’ve taken from Wikipedia?

    Not a good look for such a prolific virtue signaller!

    This is how it’s done…

    Excerpt from, Leuchter report:

    Leuchter cited the absence of Prussian blue in the homicidal gas chambers to support his view that they could not have been used to gas people. However, residual iron-based cyanide compounds are not a categorical consequence of cyanide exposure. By not discriminating against that, Leuchter introduced an unreliable factor into his experiment, and his findings were seriously flawed as a result.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leuchter_report

  397. RossR says:

    [Dr. James Roth was the twenty-second witness called by the defence. He testified on Thursday, April 21, 1988.]
    Dr. James Roth, the laboratory manager of Alpha Analytical Laboratories, testified as to the results of tests done on the numbered samples removed from Auschwitz and Birkenau by Fred A. Leuchter. Roth had obtained his doctorate from Cornell University in analytical chemistry.
    Roth testified that he received samples from Fred Leuchter in his capacity as an Analytical Chemist at Alpha Analytical Laboratories. Roth directly supervised the tests performed on the samples and the preparation of the test report. The purpose of the tests was to determine total iron content and total cyanide content in the samples. The identification numbers assigned to the samples were those designated by Leuchter. (33-9274 to 9276)

    Prussian blue did not normally disappear unless it was physically removed. To be removed from a porous material like a brick it would have to be removed by sandblasting or grinding down the surface or by the application of a strong acid such as high levels of sulphuric, nitric or hydrochloric acid. It would be more difficult to remove from porous surfaces because of the fact that the formation would have taken on depth. (33-9297, 9298) This ended the examination-in-chief of Roth, and his cross- examination commenced.
    Roth testified that he did not take the samples or have any control over the sample taking. He agreed that cyanide radicals could exist in forms other than Prussian blue and that the absence of Prussian blue did not necessarily mean that cyanide radicals were absent. To Pearson’s suggestion that a good control sample would have been one where Prussian blue was not present in order to determine if any cyanide radicals were present there, Roth pointed out that there were many samples where no cyanide was detected. (33-9301, 9302)

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  398. Corvinus says:
    @Pat Kittle

    More triggering on your part.

    • Replies: @Pat Kittle
  399. RossR says:
    @Corvinus

    Is it illegal to ask questions?
    The simple answer here is yes, it is illegal to ask certain questions in many European countries

    If I had to ask how many people were killed during world war two, could you give me the answer to this question? Probably a lot of people could

    If I had to ask how many British were killed during world war two, could you give me an answer to this question? Maybe, some people could.

    If I had to ask how many Scottish people died during world war two, could you give me the answer to this question? I am not sure many people would

    If I had to ask how many people of the Jewish faith died during world 
war two, could you give me an answer to this question? I am absolutely positive that everybody knows the answer to that question.

    Why is this, why are we knowledgeable of some facts and not knowledgeable of others? Could it be that media conditioning is responsible for this?

    Let me try some other questions. Questions that can put you in prison in seventeen different countries. Yes, put in prison for asking questions.

    * If I had to ask the question “did six million really die?” would I be put in prison for this? The answer is yes, in seventeen different countries. 


    * If I had to ask the question “Why are there so many survivors to these gas chambers if it was the Germans sole purpose of destroying all Jews, there seems to be millions of survivors who would have been young children then and we are constantly told that the young, old and infirm were the first into the gas chambers?” Would I be put in prison for asking this? Yes , in seventeen different countries


    * If I had to ask the question “why is there no forensic evidence of anybody being killed by gassing during world war two? Would I be put in prison? Yes, in seventeen different countries. 


    * If I had to ask the question “Why are the doors of the gas chambers in Auschwitz made of wood, have a window, have no sealing round them and open inwards into the chambers? Would I be put in prison? Yes in seventeen different countries. 


    * If I had to ask the question. “After the war thousands of tons of German documents were acquired by the Allies, why is there not one that pertains to the industrial gassing of millions of Jewish people 
even though we know that Germans are very particular about documentation?” Would I be put in prison? Yes, in seventeen different countries. 


    * There are myriad of questions like this that have been asked by very erudite people who have subsequently ended up doing time in prison. 

    Tell me, why is this so? Why are we not allowed to debate this subject?

    Here are some of the names of people who have been imprisoned simply for asking questions about recent history, please look up these people and do your own research.

    Ernst Zundel : Three court cases and eventually six years in prison

    Sylvia Stoltz: This lawyer spent Three and a half years in prison in Germany, arrested in the court room during trial whilst she was defending her client, Ernst Zundel, too well and proving he was telling the truth.

    David Irving: World renowned historian. Two and a half years in an Austrian jail for asking questions.

    Germar Rudolf: two and a half years. For asking questions.

    Vincent Reynouard: 2004 sentenced to two years. 2008 sentenced to one year. 2015 sentenced to one year.

    Ursula Haverbeck: This 89 year old grandmother has recently, this year, been
    sentenced to fifteen months imprisonment for asking questions.

    There are many, many more, too many to mention here.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  400. Anon[293] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anon

    Jewish power is so all-pervasive that they even run this website that offers Jew-haters an opportunity to rant and rave!

    That’s about as logical as having the Catholic Church run a forum for survivors of clerical sex abuse!

    • Replies: @Pat Kittle
  401. @Anon

    You couldn’t get along without the Jews. They own everything important in your life, your home your car your college education, everything via their international banking syndicates. So suck it up and try to enjoy your slavery.

    Your point is well taken (as confirmed by (((Corvinus))) calling you “Troll”).

    But I’ve managed to stay very independent of the (((shysters))) which is one reason why I use my real name online.

  402. @Corvinus

    (((Corvinus the hasbara Jew troll))):

    More triggering on your part.

    Yes, I have triggered (((your hypocrisy))):

    YOU, (((CORVINUS))), DO NOT OBJECT TO IMPRISONING “HOLOCAU\$T” QUESTIONERS.

    Future Unz commenters will be duly advised.

  403. @Antiochus

    You will find form and freedom in Buddhism. They are not mutually exclusive. The Inner Reality holds the Ultimate Truth. If you haven’t read Jung, you should start with excellent YouTube videos from Academy of Ideas.

    Don’t be a slave to Enlightenment Materialist Determinism.

  404. @Anon

    Jewish power is so all-pervasive that they even run this website that offers Jew-haters an opportunity to rant and rave!

    I for one do not think all Jews are profoundly evil.

    I figure that ethically, Jews lie on a bell curve.

    At the highly ethical end we find the kind that make it possible for us to use this superb site.

    Most Jews are somewhere along the middle of the curve. They don’t consciously seek White genocide, but they enable it.

    At the other end we find the pathologically genocidal Jews behind so much of the misery in the world.

    • Replies: @Ben Sampson
    , @Anon
  405. Corvinus says:
    @RossR

    It already has been explained.

    So let’s focus on eye witness accounts. How do you challenge what they saw repeatedly take place?

    —After a few days, they put me in a work group disinfecting the clothes of Jews. Sixteen of us worked in that group. Clothes of murdered Jews were brought from field V to the gas chamber (gas room) next to the bathhouse. In the very place where Germans used to poison people with Zyklon; we hung the clothes on hooks, not all, only those in good condition and of high quality. After hanging the clothes, we prepared the gas chamber doors for closing, one of us received a can of Zyklon, put it on the floor placing a piece of metal pipe, 6-8 cm in diameter, upside down. Another one took a very heavy hammer and hit it, punching a hole in the Zyklon can – you then had to quickly take the can in hand, spill its contents in one swing and immediately run, because staying there even a few seconds longer could cause death’ [APMM, Memoirs and reports, VII—131, Henryk Nieścior, pp. 1 Iff].

    —Standing in front of Effektenkammer [the barracks for confiscated prisoner property], I often observed prisoners led to the bathhouse. There was a chimney-shaped opening on the roof. An orderly came with a ladder, propped it against the barracks, and climbed to the roof. He spilled something from a can into the chimney. Later, I saw naked bodies being carried out of the barracks and loaded onto a wooden wagon’ [BAL, Barch B162/407 AR-Z 297/60, Rudolf Ettrich, Witness interrogation protocol, vol. 20. c. 4182].

    —The gas chamber, located opposite the entrance to field I, was used once a day. The bodies of gassed people were loaded onto car trailers at night and taken away with a tractor to the crematorium. Every time tractors ran around the camp at night, it was known that gassing had taken place that day’ [Kwiatkowski, “Oskarżam,” pp. 409ff].

    —Natan Żelechower was an eyewitness to this attempt to destroy the evidence of that crime:
    ‘We could clearly see before us a small, fenced square, with some buildings standing on the left. In front of them, there was a huge fire surrounded by a small embankment. Billows of grey and black smoke rose from the fire, blown by the wind in various directions. We were struck with the burning odour, which gagged us. A pile of several hundred bodies lay to the right of the fire. We clearly saw emaciated human bodies, bruised and twisted, sometimes totally black to, probably due to beatings or hematoma. Bodies were lying in various directions, men mixed with women and children. Two men, pulling by hands and legs, picked up a body from the pile and, swinging it, threw it to two other men, standing on the embankment by the fire’ [APMM, Memoirs and reports, VII-643, Natan Żelechower, p. 25].

    • Replies: @RossR
  406. @Pat Kittle

    I tend to agree…especially about this site. UR is a less censored site that its similar Saker

    Given the millennia of expulsions etc., I figure most Jews were in fully on the Jewish thing. Then unless the inoculation of the majority of the Jewish population with salt/water placebo Covid vaxx regular Jews are in as we, relative to the evil, elitist end of their Bell.

    Nature is basically evil anyway. Humans must revolutionize life and nature too, create the proper universe out of the ingredients available…or make what we need.

  407. Corvinus says:
    @RossR

    https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783110288216.109/html

    —The prosecution opened its case with a general description of the war as well as the concentration and death camps through its expert witness, Raul Hilberg. With impressive erudition and comprehensive knowledge, Hilberg testified to the obvious mistakes, falsities, and the numerous absurdities expressed in Zündel’s texts and positions. He was followed by a number of Holocaust survivors who were asked to describe the conditions and the daily life in the camps; among them was Professor Rudolf Vrba.

    Some witnesses were also called specifically to counter Zündel’s assertions about a Jewish-Freemason conspiracy whose activities included the control and manipulation of Canada’s current banking system. Griffiths sought not only to overturn these claims, but to prove that Zündel knew that they were false. During cross-examination, Christie tried to cast doubt on the testimony of the prosecution’s witnesses. He underlined the unreliable nature of the survivors’ memories and the dangers of accepting their testimonies at face value. Hilberg responded to Christie with detailed explanations in order to demonstrate that Zündel’s assertions were “concoction, contradiction and untruth mixed with half-truth.”

    Christie replied that all the historical and testimonial books presented as evidence by Hilberg and the survivors were mere opinion and, as such, inconclusive in all aspects. Christie tried several techniques to discredit the testimony from Holocaust survivors about the concentration camps. First, he aggressively labeled the witnesses as co-conspirators who knowingly falsified their testimony to further the oals of a Judeo-Masonic conspiracy. He suggested that their stories had simply been learned by rote and were uttered for Machiavellian reasons.

    Hence, any discrepancy or minor error discredited the entire testimony, and exposed the manipulation. Consequently, argued Christie, their testimony revealed the scope of a conspiracy capable of producing so many, and seemingly coordinated recollections. He claimed that the witnesses purposely adapted their stories to meet the needs of secret manipulators who sought to refashion the truth and engaged in a war against the non-Jewish world.

    Christie added, with characteristic irony, that these witnesses were more victims of the conspiracy than of the Nazis; they were dupes of a conspiracy that had not hesitated to sacrifice them for its own
    purposes. Christie insisted that the witnesses should rebel, join the ranks of the revisionists, and fight against their coreligionists. According to this argument, the voracity of the conspiracy justifies the Holocaust deniers: if the conspiracy goes to these extremes, it is because the stakes are of vital importance.

    At its most cynical, the defense advanced the following notion: if not all Jews died, then none was destined to die. The very existence of survivors clearly indicates, according to Zündel, that there was no systematic purpose to Nazi action; if deaths occurred, they were accidental or natural, or the result of unrelenting Allied bombing of supply trains. Christie employed counterfactual interpretations to distort events that are already part of the historical record.

    For example, he tried to reinterpret the selection process upon arrival at Auschwitz—widely understood as a barbaric act in which the lives of the victims were decided at the whim of the executioners. The defense argued, however, that instead of counting the number of people eliminated because of poor health or uselessness as laborers, one should accept that German officers saved many for work, and thus, contributed to the Jews’ survival. Since all of this was done according to rules of necessity, no one should imply a malicious intent to these soldiers and even less to the policy of resettlement for work.

    Christie liberally applied the notion of mass hysteria to try to explain the supposedly unrealistic number of deaths and the convergence of testimonies given
    by Holocaust survivors. Several witnesses for the defense referred to “hysteria” in the immediate postwar period, particularly during the Nuremberg trials. Christie insisted that, in time of war and revenge, exaggerated rumors and stories circulate widely; he even made a few points with the jury by using the notion of hysteria to explain some discrepancies or inconsistencies in testimonies from survivors, much to their dismay. —

    • Replies: @RossR
  408. Corvinus says:
    @RossR

    Roth testified that in order to have Prussian blue, iron must be present and accessible to the cyanide. (33-9301) He agreed that the presence of Prussian blue almost guaranteed that the ferri-cyanide complex was present. (33-9302) How deep Prussian blue would penetrate was totally dependent on many factors, such as the porosity of material and what moisture existed in the area. (33-9303)

    Asked if a building was blown up with dynamite and the surface blown off, the Prussian blue might thereby be removed, Roth replied that if just the surface was removed and the rest of the material was left, the answer would be yes. The Crown stated this was not what was suggested; the suggestion was that in an explosion the surface of the brick would come off.

    Roth replied that normally bricks would break up. “Now, if that’s removal of the surface, yes.” (33-9304)

    • Replies: @RossR
  409. RossR says:
    @Corvinus

    LMFAO. Now we are onto the witness statements. Utterly ludicrous statements. Hahahahahahahahahahahahaahaaha, keep digging jew.

    Let’s hear the one about how a witness could tell which nationality the jew was because of the colour of the smoke, ahahahahahaah. Talking about chimneys, we know that the chimney in Auschwitz was built after the war by the soviets and is not connected to any building. Also, the many witness reports about the flames coming from the chimney, lol, if flames come out a chimney call the firebrigade , it means there is a big problem.

    Let’s hear about the one were the witness swallowed five diamonds and then shit them out to swallow them again, she did this for two years, ahahahahaahaa.

    Let’s hear the one about the jews being put in roller coaster cars and rolled into the gas chambers, LMFAO haahaahahaahaah.

    Keep them coming!

    • Replies: @Corvinus
    , @Pat Kittle
  410. RossR says:
    @Corvinus

    Utter, utter lies. The 1985 Zundel trial transcript is online. I have read them and what you transcript is total barefaced lies.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  411. RossR says:
    @Corvinus

    A wooden door with a window and keyhole, no sealing around it and opens inwards. Drains in the floor going directly into the towns mains. No exraction fans to get the gas out of the chamber. Explain!

  412. Anon[295] • Disclaimer says:
    @Pat Kittle

    I think your comment is very reasonable. Most Jews do nothing about Jewish power for one of two reasons. Either they feel powerless to confront and stop it, just like everyone else, or they’re afraid of being ostracized by their community.

    I’ve mentioned this in the past and I will repeat it here. If we could designate Israel as a terrorist entity based on the 9/11 attacks, then we could disentangle ourselves from their pernicious influence without being labelled or smeared as anti-Semites. We also could blackball all Jewish power organizations as abettors of a terrorist entity. Ditto for almost all rabbis in America today. They all, even the most liberal, reflexively support Zionism and are largely responsible for stifling dissent in their communities against Israel and against abusive Jewish power.

    Since you’re big on real names, mine is Michael Korn. Mevashir is my blogging name. I note your surname is a prominent symbol of Jewish liturgical worship. Is it possible you also have Jewish ancestry? https://www.myjewishlearning.com/article/kittel/

    • Replies: @Pat Kittle
  413. Corvinus says:
    @RossR

    Exactly what I expected you to say. That was the approach of tie defense attorneys as well. In order for you (and they) to justify tje claims, provide clear, convincing evidence that each eyewitness in the trial was lying AND part of the Canadian-Jewish banking conspiracy.

    How do you exactly know every single witness lied? How do you exactly know every single witness was covering up their involvement in the scheme? Merely saying they were does not constitute proof.

    As far as Comment 419 is concerned, that was already been addressed in the past at the trial and by historians. You simply are fixated on something, like a kitten drawn to crème. Its a Jew like quality. Are you part Jewish by chance?

    • Replies: @geokat62
  414. geokat62 says:
    @Corvinus

    Its a Jew like quality. Are you part Jewish by chance?

    Hmmmm. Given that these words would only be uttered by a Jew or an alleged “Jew hater” and since you’re definitely not the latter, you are most definitely the former.

    Shalom, Corvy!

  415. RossR says:

    The wooden door without sealing around it and with a window has not been addressed.
    The lack of fans to disperse the gas has not been addressed.
    The drains going into the towns mains has not been addressed.

    Ernst Zundell trial 1985 with Raul Hillberg on the stand and attorney Christie cross examining:

    Christie [attorney]:
    “Can you give me one scientific report that shows the existence of gas chambers anywhere in Nazi-occupied territory?”

    Hilberg:
    “I’m at a loss.”

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  416. Corvinus says:
    @RossR

    Of course those three things have been addressed. You just don’t like the responses given.

    In regards to the existence of the death camps and the gas chambers, it’s already been well documented and verified of their existence.

    https://amp.theguardian.com/books/2000/jan/26/irving.uk

    And in regards to Professor Irving’s libel suit…

    —The judge summarised his findings as follows: Irving has for his own ideological reasons persistently and deliberately misrepresented and manipulated historical evidence; that for the same reasons he has portrayed Hitler in an unwarrantedly favourable light, principally in relation to his attitude towards and responsibility for the treatment of the Jews; that he is an active Holocaust denier; that he is anti-Semitic and racist, and that he associates with right-wing extremists who promote neo-Nazism…therefore the defence of justification succeeds…It follows that there must be judgment for the Defendants.

    You are way in over your head here.

  417. Corvinus says:
    @RossR

    So rather than address the points that were made, you run off your mouth in Jew fashion. I thought you didn’t look up to them.

    • Replies: @RossR
    , @Anon
  418. RossR says:
    @Corvinus

    It’s not up to me to address the points. It’s you you have to prove that the , so called, gas chambers could be used for purpose. I have proven they cannot.

    I see you are using the usual hasbara tactics of obfuscation.

    By the way it is getting so much easier, so much easier, to explain to folk about the lies. I was kicked out of someones house last year because I was trying to explain the lie. Only last week this same person wanted to me to explain again, after about ten minutes I could see the light in her eyes , she was beginning to understand. Your lies are coming to an end, the more you try to obfuscate , lie more or punish folk the more folk are waking up.

    • Thanks: Pat Kittle
    • Replies: @Corvinus
  419. Anon[238] • Disclaimer says:
    @Corvinus

    I have watched you on this thread morph from a sensible commenter into a radical Holocaust proponent. There are two things I object to in your approach.

    One is a legal principle that when eye witnesses claim to have seen something that contradicts science you are free to disregard them. So if two eye witnesses say they saw a cow jump over a barbed wire fence you can assume they’re both lying. The same here with a holocaust. When people make claims that contradict all reasonable scientific evidence, such as lack of plans for a gas chamber, a building that’s totally inadequate to serve such a function, impossible claims such as Jewish inmates clearing gassed bodies out of a so-called gas chamber without any protective clothing gloves etc, lack of ash from millions of supposedly cremated bodies etc etc, then sad though it may be you must assume they are lying.

    We also know that a number of prominent so-called eyewitnesses lied. We know this about Elie Wiesel. We know this about Viktor Frankl. So your couple of so-called eyewitnesses in Canada simply don’t carry any weight in a reasonable legal proceeding.

    The second objection is even if the Germans did gas some of the six hundred thousand Jewish victims in world war II, this would be a fraction of the total global death toll in that catastrophe. It also is a fraction of the atrocities inflicted by the Jews via their Allied proxies on both Germany and Japan. Reasonable people are tired of Jews demanding veneration of their suffering even as they denigrate and deny the vastly greater suffering of others during the same time.

    (This includes fire bombings of German and Japanese civilian cities, the nuclear attacks on Japan, and the deliberate starvation of German POWs and civilians after the war by Allied occupation forces. It also includes Winston Churchill’s deliberate and illegal nighttime air raids on German civilian centers at the beginning of the war, which prompted the Germans to retaliate six months later in what the West calls the Battle of Britain, pretending it was a purely unprovoked attack on innocent England.)

    You would be wise to take a step back and try to see the bigger picture and not allow yourself to be used as a patsy by cynical ruthless and brutal people.

    • Thanks: Pat Kittle, RossR
    • Replies: @Corvinus
  420. Corvinus says:
    @RossR

    “It’s not up to me to address the points.”

    Again, you’re running away from discourse.

    “It’s you you have to prove that the , so called, gas chambers could be used for purpose. I have proven they cannot.”

    You have not done anything of the kind. I have provided sources and evidence.

    “I see you are using the usual hasbara tactics of obfuscation.”

    You are projecting just like the Jews you allegedly despise. Again, are you Jewish? I am goy, pure goy–Dutch, German, Polish. I am suspecting you are Jewish by the way you are acting.

    “Only last week this same person wanted to me to explain again, after about ten minutes I could see the light in her eyes , she was beginning to understand.”

    And now you are simply making things up to justify your confirmation bias.

  421. @RossR

    You’re doing an superb job of debunking the “Holocau\$t” — thank you.

    (((Corvinus))) is obviously one or more hasbara Jew trolls — with 13,700 hasbara-type comments here at the Unz Review.

    You aren’t telling (((Corvinus))) anything (((he))) doesn’t know — (((he))) knows the “Holocau\$t” is a hoax.

    That doesn’t mean we waste our time debunking hasbara trolls. Many Unz Review readers are newcomers to uncensored facts. It is for them that we bother to reply to the likes of (((Corvinus))).

    Nothing needs debunking more than the “Holocau\$t” — the fundamental foundation upon which criminal Jews & their criminal organizations base their treachery. As it is exposed as the hoax it is, so too is all the treachery that it is based on.

    • Thanks: RossR
    • Replies: @Pat Kittle
  422. @Pat Kittle

    ^ [[ LAST PARAGRAPH (in my previous comment) RESTATED ]]:

    Nothing needs debunking more than the “Holocau\$t” — the fundamental foundation upon which criminal Jews & their criminal organizations base their treachery. With the hoax exposed, the Holocau\$tCard loses its power.

  423. @Anon

    I think your comment is very reasonable.

    Thank you, and likewise.

    As for my ancestry, I figured I might be part Jewish, but 23&me says not.
    — 99.9% European, mostly NW European.
    — 0.1% MENA (Middle-Eastern-North-African)

    That 0.1% qualifies me as a POC & maybe an African American.
    🙂

  424. Corvinus says:
    @Anon

    “I have watched you on this thread morph from a sensible commenter into a radical Holocaust proponent.”

    You mean Holocaust non-denier.

    “One is a legal principle that when eye witnesses claim to have seen something that contradicts science you are free to disregard them.”

    Except the science demonstrating that the death camps and the gas chambers existed are conclusive. Moreover, the hundreds of eyewitness accounts verify one another. They have interconnected threads.

    “When people make claims that contradict all reasonable scientific evidence, such as lack of plans for a gas chamber, a building that’s totally inadequate to serve such a function, impossible claims such as Jewish inmates clearing gassed bodies out of a so-called gas chamber without any protective clothing gloves etc, lack of ash from millions of supposedly cremated bodies etc etc, then sad though it may be you must assume they are lying.”

    Assume at your own peril.

    https://time.com/5371687/nazi-camp-crematorium-builders/

    “We also know that a number of prominent so-called eyewitnesses lied. We know this about Elie Wiesel. We know this about Viktor Frankl.”

    Let us assume they did lie. Their accounts have nothing to do with the veracity for each eyewitness account, which are in the thousands. In a court of law, you do not bunch together the common witnesses and simply say they all are lying. Rather, you have to properly vet each person’s account. That is what you have to do here as well.

    “So your couple of so-called eyewitnesses in Canada simply don’t carry any weight in a reasonable legal proceeding.”

    You have to conclusively prove, rather than merely assume, they are lying. Where is your evidence that calls into significant question their accounts?

    “The second objection is even if the Germans did gas some of the six hundred thousand Jewish victims in world war II”

    Besides gassing them, shepherding them from their homes, separating them from their families, forcing them to live in a ghetto, and herding them into boxcars to work camps and death camps, Yeah, not really all that bad, especially for the young children and the elderly. Did these two groups in particular deserve their fate?

    “It also is a fraction of the atrocities inflicted by the Jews via their Allied proxies on both Germany and Japan”.

    It’s called war for a reason. Could not have the citizens of Germany and Japan put pressure on their own governments to not have invaded free countries for land and resources?

    “Reasonable people are tired of Jews demanding veneration of their suffering even as they denigrate and deny the vastly greater suffering of others during the same time.”

    Ah, yes, you are employing a version of the No Scotsman Fallacy.

    “(This includes fire bombings of German and Japanese civilian cities, the nuclear attacks on Japan, and the deliberate starvation of German POWs and civilians after the war by Allied occupation forces. It also includes Winston Churchill’s deliberate and illegal nighttime air raids on German civilian centers at the beginning of the war, which prompted the Germans to retaliate six months later in what the West calls the Battle of Britain, pretending it was a purely unprovoked attack on innocent England.)”

    Again, it’s called war for a reason. Again, why did Germany and Japan initiate the jackbooting, pillaging, and raping? Why were the people of both of those nations on board with their exploitative efforts?

    “You would be wise to take a step back and try to see the bigger picture and not allow yourself to be used as a patsy by cynical ruthless and brutal people.”

    Look in the mirror, my white friend.

    • Replies: @Anon
    , @geokat62
  425. Anon[878] • Disclaimer says:
    @Corvinus

    Look in the mirror, my white friend.

    I’m not white my bleeding heart freund. I am an Israeli. Hitler was our greatest ideological ally. Throughout the 1930s he permitted Zionist youth groups and kibbutz training camps to operate in the Reich. The Transfer Agreement provided vital wealth to our struggling Jewish Yishuv. The Jews who perished in WWII were the tragic victims of failing to see the trends of history playing out in the right direction.

    As far as Israelis are concerned, the real villains of WWII are the British who blocked Jewish immigration into Palestine at the very time the Germans were trying to deport Jews there.

    Bolshevik Jews threatened Germany’s survival both politically and culturally. They had every right to target the Jews of Europe who embraced international socialism rather than Jewish nationalist socialism (Jewish naZionism).

    Thanks for your concern for Hitler’s Jewish victims, but you need to understand that from our perspective there would be no State of Israel without Hitler. It’s a tradeoff we were forced to accept.

    I noticed that you let my comment about 600,000 Jewish victims of WWII to slide by. Was that deliberate or sloppiness on your part?

    https://time.com/5371687/nazi-camp-crematorium-builders/ – Not sure the point of this article. No one disputes that the Germans used crematoria to dispose of dead bodies. What does that have to do with gas chambers?

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  426. Corvinus says:
    @Anon

    “I’m not white my bleeding heart freund. I am an Israeli.”

    I doubt it, but I’ll play along. Being an Israelite does not mean you are Jewish. So, are you Jewish or non-Jewish? Exactly what is your ethnicity?

    “Hitler was our greatest ideological ally. Throughout the 1930s he permitted Zionist youth groups and kibbutz training camps to operate in the Reich. The Transfer Agreement provided vital wealth to our struggling Jewish Yishuv. The Jews who perished in WWII were the tragic victims of failing to see the trends of history playing out in the right direction.”

    The reason being that he hoped Jews would leave on their own accord. Until October 1941, German policy officially encouraged Jewish emigration. Those groups was steadfast in their devotion to remain loyal to a nation that was rapidly becoming both hostile and exclusive. For many Jews, they were German, and refused to be forced to leave their community and places of business. But in the end, Hitler turned on them by stripping them of legal rights, of their property, and of their dignity. Do you approve of his methods to destroy Jews in that fashion?

    “As far as Israelis are concerned, the real villains of WWII are the British who blocked Jewish immigration into Palestine at the very time the Germans were trying to deport Jews there.”

    From 1933-1936, the British enabled more than 130,000 Jews to enter Palestine. The Palestinian Revolt from 1936-1939 led Great Britain to create a policy (White Paper) in 1939 with a quota of 75,000 Jews for five years. So emigration there was not blocked, but limited.

    “Bolshevik Jews threatened Germany’s survival both politically and culturally. They had every right to target the Jews of Europe who embraced international socialism rather than Jewish nationalist socialism (Jewish naZionism).”

    Not all, or even most, Jews were/are Bolsheviks. How many exactly were rounded up who fit that (narrow) description? Should even the children of parents of that group had been taken by force? Why?

    “Thanks for your concern for Hitler’s Jewish victims, but you need to understand that from our perspective there would be no State of Israel without Hitler. It’s a tradeoff we were forced to accept.”

    Ah, your counterfactual makes an ugly appearance.

    In the first instance, you buy a house next door to your brother and begin moving your family and furniture in. In the second instance, you buy a house next door to your brother and before you can start moving your family and furniture in, your wife and children are brutally murdered by a psychopath. Israel was founded IN SPITE of Hitler, not because of him, and way before he became dictator.

    “I noticed that you let my comment about 600,000 Jewish victims of WWII to slide by. Was that deliberate or sloppiness on your part?

    We can dispute the numbers all we want. The fact of the matter is that the Holocaust occurred, and Jews most likely by the millions died.

    “What does that have to do with gas chambers?”

    Because the crematoriums were constructed to dispose of the bodies from the gas chambers.

    • Replies: @Anon
    , @Anon
  427. Anon[117] • Disclaimer says:
    @Corvinus

    My understanding is that Hitler turned on the Jews in 1942 when it became clear that world Jewry supported Stalin and Bolshevism against Germany. At that point he took European Jewry as hostages, as it were, against the unjust attacks against Germany by the Allied proxies of world Jewry. Most of the European Jews who were rounded up into concentration camps were wholly innocent. But Jewish people are judged collectively for the sins of their worst elements. And those elements picked the wrong fight with Hitler’s Germany in collusion with Soviet Bolshevism.

    Compared to the vile mass murderer Stalin, Hitler was a cultured gentleman. Do you truly believe it was justified to support Stalin over Hitler? Some historians, who have been published on TUR, contend that Hitler prevented Stalin from invading Europe and enslaving all Europeans under Bolshevik despotism. It’s possible that without Allied support for Stalin, world war II would have ended in 1942, at which point the Jews of Europe would have been evacuated either to distant Siberia or to Palestine.

    The worst German atrocities against European Jews took place after the war effort against the USSR bogged down due to massive Allied rearmament in support of the Bolsheviks. And that’s when the Germans decided to target European Jewry. Their policy was cruel but the stakes were very high and their survival was on the line. I don’t think they can be blamed for pouring out their wrath and frustration on the Jews of Europe in retaliation for world Jewish elites supporting the Bolshevik tyranny.

    I don’t know what you mean that Israel was established before Hitler became dictator. Hitler was elected in 1933. (By the way 80% of German Jews voted for him.) Israel was not formally established until 1948. In fact Israel unilaterally declared independence violating the terms of the UN partition plan. At any rate this was after the end of world war II. The Jewish refugee crisis in Europe at the end of the war catalyzed the sympathy of Western Nations to ratify the UN partition plan, itself an unjust act against the Palestinian natives.

    The way I see it, Hitler and Herzl were the negative and positive poles of the Zionist circuit. Herzl was the carrot and Hitler was the stick, but they both were absolutely necessary for the formation of the Zionist State in the realization of the Zionist dream.

    Hirtzel – Hitler: spelled in this manner they have virtually the same letters.

    The British white paper that limited Jewish immigration to 75000 was far far short of what was necessary to deport German Jews to Palestine. I believe the German Jewish population numbered 500,000. To say nothing of the numbers of Jews that the Germans wished to deport from all of occupied Europe.
    This is a photo of my old Israeli passport. You can judge for yourself if I am Jewish enough for you.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
    , @Corvinus
  428. Anon[117] • Disclaimer says:
    @Corvinus

    Because the crematoriums were constructed to dispose of the bodies from the gas chambers.

    I think your point here is valid. The revisionists claim that Auschwitz was a work camp not a death camp. They seem to agree about the existence of the crematoria ovens but they dispute the homicidal gas chambers.

    But it doesn’t make sense if Auschwitz was simply a work camp that there should have been 24 crematoria. The revisionists claim that most of the death toll in Auschwitz came at the end of the war due to typhus and starvation primarily because of the massive Allied bombardments of Germany that severed supply lines to the concentration camp system. The revisionists claim that this caused the mass deaths of the prisoners.

    But if so why were crematoria ovens present in Auschwitz back in 1942 if the revisionists are correct that it was never designed to be a death camp? If the revisionists are correct that Auschwitz was intended purely to be a labor camp, there was no reason for a mass array of crematoria ovens because a mass death toll never was anticipated back then.

    So I would have to concur with you that the existence of crematoria ovens is strongly indicative that homicidal policies were being pursued at Auschwitz.

  429. @geokat62

    “JUDEA DECLARES WAR ON GERMANY” — March 24, 1933

    ==========================================================================================================
    And when you declare war on someone, they just might take you prisoner of war.

    Shocking, isn’t it!

  430. Corvinus says:
    @Anon

    “This is a photo of my old Israeli passport. You can judge for yourself if I am Jewish enough for you.”

    LOL, the Internet is a wonderful thing. You, as an Anony, suddenly and willingly outed yourself when I dared to question your Israeli credentials by showing everyone on this fine opinion webzine your “old passport”.

    So, are you truly Menachem Korn, a “messianic Jew turned rabid Christian” who in 2007 sent “pamphlets, letters, and threatening e-mails” to biology professors at the University of Colorado?

    Here is the source that has “your” Israeli passport, as well as your (alleged) actions directed toward those educators.

    https://sciencenotes.wordpress.com/2007/07/13/curses-foiled-again

    Here is you speaking to wired.com in 2007 about your “cause”.

    https://www.wired.com/2007/07/michael-korn-al/

    What say you on this matter?

  431. Corvinus says:
    @Anon

    “My understanding is that Hitler turned on the Jews in 1942 when it became clear that world Jewry supported Stalin and Bolshevism against Germany.”

    Hitler turned on his countrymen, i.e. German Jews, beginning in April 1933. Moreover, you are making a sweeping generalization here. Hitler ASSUMED that world Jewry, aka all or most, supported Stalin. Exactly what numbers or percentages of “world Jewry” had supported Bolshevism which necessitated German action against ALL Jews? In what specific ways did “world Jewry” demonstrate fealty to Stalin from Hitler’s perspective?

    “At that point he took European Jewry as hostages, as it were, against the unjust attacks against Germany by the Allied proxies of world Jewry”.

    Yet another sweeping generalization.

    “Most of the European Jews who were rounded up into concentration camps were wholly innocent.”


    Finally, you make some sense here.

    “But Jewish people are judged collectively for the sins of their worst elements.”

    By whom?

    “Compared to the vile mass murderer Stalin, Hitler was a cultured gentleman. Do you truly believe it was justified to support Stalin over Hitler?”

    There is no justification to support EITHER leader. There is no comparison as far as how one man is more cruel than another man or why one man was less cruel than another man. Both men were evil. Both men engaged in crimes against humanity.

    “Some historians, who have been published on TUR, contend that Hitler prevented Stalin from invading Europe and enslaving all Europeans under Bolshevik despotism.”

    Which historians? Regardless, you are proposing a counterfactual.

    “It’s possible that without Allied support for Stalin, world war II would have ended in 1942”

    No, Germany by that point had control of a great deal of the European continent.

    “The worst German atrocities against European Jews took place after the war effort against the USSR bogged down due to massive Allied rearmament in support of the Bolsheviks.”

    You mean in support of a common enemy, which was Germany, Italy, and Japan. Remember, Germany initiated the invasion of several free countries. Furthermore, the German atrocities began when it stripped away the rights and dignity of Jews in 1933.

    “I don’t know what you mean that Israel was established before Hitler became dictator.”

    I stated that Israel was on its way to being established prior to Hitler being dictator.

    “The British white paper that limited Jewish immigration to 75000 was far far short of what was necessary to deport German Jews to Palestine.”

    Right, limited, but not blocked, as you wrongly stated.

  432. Corvinus says:
    @geokat62

    Classic propaganda on the part of the Nazi Party. I take it you had no problems when Jewish families were forced to separate, with children especially being ripped away from their parents.

    • Replies: @geokat62
    , @Anon
  433. geokat62 says:
    @Corvinus

    Classic propaganda on the part of the Nazi Party.

    lol! The Nazis? Did they call it a Holy War?

    Excerpt from The Jewish Declaration of War on Nazi Germany: The Economic Boycott of 1933. M. Raphael Johnson, Ph.D.:

    Few people know the facts about the singular event that helped spark what ultimately became known as World War II – the international Jewish declaration of war on Germany shortly after Adolf Hitler came to power and well before any official German government sanctions or reprisals against Jews were carried out. The March 24, 1933 issue of The Daily Express of London (shown above) described how Jewish leaders, in combination with powerful international Jewish financial interests, had launched a boycott of Germany for the express purpose of crippling her already precarious economy in the hope of bringing down the new Hitler regime. It was only then that Germany struck back in response. Thus, if truth be told, it was the worldwide Jewish leadership – not the Third Reich – that effectively fired the first shot in the Second World War. Prominent New York attorney Samuel Untermyer (above right) was one of the leading agitators in the war against Germany, describing the Jewish campaign as nothing less than a “holy war.”

    https://wintersonnenwende.com/scriptorium/english/archives/articles/jdecwar.html

    • Replies: @Emerging Majority
  434. @geokat62

    To be more precise, the Rottenchild Crime Clan, in combination with the “judicial” rulership of Jewish religionists and cultural adherents since the time of the Babylonian Captivity–that leadership clearly being the 2,500 year old Sanhedrin—ORCHESTRATED–via their financial and ethno-Masonic control mechanisms of such Jewish institutions as the primary New York department stores and much of the mass-media infusing the Western world–the attack by deeply ORGANIZED Jewery against the newly elected German government.

    Initially, there did not appear to be any desire by those directing the German government of that era to come down hard on the generality of German Jews. The majority, perhaps the vast majority of German Jews, were quite innocent of any assault against the German state.

    However, the leadership/ownership of the Judaic peoples most certainly were the guilty parties in the instigation of the Second World War. This reality becomes most evident when British politicians such as Lord Halifax, were totally diligent in goading the geopolitically and militarily
    naive Polish government of that era into carrying out sanctioned programs against the million or so ethnic Germans who had been stuck within the Polish state by the terms of the egregious Treaty of Versailles.

    Being something like 90% ethnically German, it was also the desire of the German government to return the so called “free city” of Danzig (under the auspices of the League of Nations) back into the Reich. It was also the objective of that government to run an autobahn and railroad through the Polish Corridor, to establish a land connection between that Germanic outpost and the national state. The Poles would still retain their corridor and Gydinia as their outport on the Baltic.

    The tender by the Germans was utterly denied by the Warsaw regime, which had British guarantees of a declaration of war should Germany try to relieve the situation by force of arms.

    Must it be pointed out to the likes of “Corvinus” that since 1815 the Rottenchild Crime Clan has enjoyed full financial control over the island of Britain, inclusive of the Monarchy, Parliament and most particularly the world’s financial center, City of London.

    With the primary banking institution belonging to the Rottenchild octopus in full domination of “The City”; it is manifestly evident that the impetus behind the machinations of “Perfidious Albion” regarding the dispute between Germany and Poland, emanated from a few whispered instructions in City of London, an independent realm, yet another instance in which the tail wags the dog.

    • Thanks: geokat62
    • Replies: @Anon
  435. Anon[203] • Disclaimer says:
    @Corvinus

    The Jews slaughtered men women and children repeatedly in the Old Testament. Why shouldn’t they have a taste of their own medicine?

    Regarding CU-Boulder: that was fifteen years ago and I am no longer a Young Earth Creationist. I don’t accept the literal biblical geological timeline either. I’ve learned a few things along the way; maybe you can too.

    The reason I have been posting as Anon is that Unz has been preventing me from posting more than two comments a day across all threads under my handle. I have nothing to hide but this is the only way I’m able to comment on this website.

    When I said that world war II would have ended in 1942, it would have ended with a German victory and a negotiated peace with England and the USA. The Soviet Union would have had regime-change courtesy of the Germans. A very nice outcome!

    It was not at all clear before world war II that the Jewish settlement in Palestine would attain political autonomy. The Orthodox Jewish community, who constituted the majority of Jewish residents there, opposed Zionism and Partition and wanted to be part of the Kingdom of Jordan. It’s possible this might have ensued. The Jewish refugee crisis in Europe following the war changed the calculation and made the Western Nations who controlled the UN favor Jewish political autonomy. The Jews unilaterally declared independence in 1948 in violation of the Partition Plan after Zionist terrorists assassinated the UN mediator.

    Without Hitler there never would have been the crisis that forced the Zionist issue into the forefront of international diplomacy. As I stated before, Herzl was the carrot and Hitler the stick.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  436. Anon[203] • Disclaimer says:
    @Emerging Majority

    They also control the Vatican due to their repeated financial bailouts of that institution. And that may explain the Vatican’s ambivalence about supporting Hitler as their champion to overthrow Soviet Bolshevism.

  437. Corvinus says:
    @Anon

    “The Jews slaughtered men women and children repeatedly in the Old Testament. Why shouldn’t they have a taste of their own medicine?”

    You previously stated that “Most of the European Jews who were rounded up into concentration camps were wholly innocent”. Now you claim that this group deserved their fate? There is an obvious disconnect here on your part. So what exactly is your position?

    “Regarding CU-Boulder: that was fifteen years ago and I am no longer a Young Earth Creationist. I don’t accept the literal biblical geological timeline either. I’ve learned a few things along the way; maybe you can too.”

    You have posted as Anon203, Anon117, and Anon878. You claim to be an Israeli that goes by the last name of Korn. It is other than certain you are Jewish. Seems to me you have an identity issue. Do you even renounce the threats you made toward the CU-Bolder professors?

    “When I said that world war II would have ended in 1942, it would have ended with a German victory and a negotiated peace with England and the USA. The Soviet Union would have had regime-change courtesy of the Germans. A very nice outcome!”

    You do relish your counterfactuals. The free people of Europe under the jack booting authority of the Nazi Regime had one common goal—defeat Germany. Why do you infer that millions of subjugated people would have willingly submitted to Hitler’s sadistic policies?

    “Without Hitler there never would have been the crisis that forced the Zionist issue into the forefront of international diplomacy. As I stated before, Herzl was the carrot and Hitler the stick.”

    You’re only wildly speculating here.

    • Replies: @Anon
  438. Anon[397] • Disclaimer says:
    @Corvinus

    I’ve explained to you why I post as Anon. Ask RU why he is blocking me and stifling my voice. I think I’ve made some amazing contributions to this commentariat.

    About five years ago I wrote an email of apology to all the professors at CU+Boulder. Not surprisingly, that was not considered newsworthy enough to publish in Wired.

    I’ve seen essays about the enthusiasm in France under the German occupation. Ireland Spain Sweden and Switzerland were neutral. Italy was an ally. German soldiers were welcomed as liberating heroes all across Eastern Europe and the Soviet Bloc.

    Do you know that a number of Nobel prize-winning German scientists supported the Nazi party? Tell me one legitimate cultured Russian person who supported Stalin!

    The Jews who suffered in world war II were largely innocent, except for the fact that they were opponents of Europe’s traditional Christian culture. But karma works that way. To correct an ancient Injustice of Jewish savagery in the Old Testament, 3000 years later fully innocent Jews have to pay the karmic retribution. Surely you comprehend this principle?

    If you were as smart as you are stubborn and arrogant, you would truly be a genius and Unz might even publish you as one of his featured writers. As it is you’re just an annoying intellectual hemorrhoid.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  439. Corvinus says:
    @Anon

    “I’ve explained to you why I post as Anon.”

    Yes, under now four different domains.

    “Ask RU why he is blocking me and stifling my voice. I think I’ve made some amazing contributions to this commentariat.”

    In your opinion.

    “About five years ago I wrote an email of apology to all the professors at CU+Boulder. Not surprisingly, that was not considered newsworthy enough to publish in Wired.”

    The incident occurred in 2007. You waited until 2016–nine years later–to write a letter of apology?

    “I’ve seen essays about the enthusiasm in France under the German occupation.”

    From whom? What were their intentions and motivations? Of course, you will have a small segment of French population who may have preferred autocratic rule, but not the super majority of citizens there, as well as the millions of people who bitterly opposed the Nazi Regime. Why would anyone would have desired to be subjected to his iron-fisted rule?

    “Ireland Spain Sweden and Switzerland were neutral.”

    Not to Hitler’s immorality and reign of terror.

    “German soldiers were welcomed as liberating heroes all across Eastern Europe and the Soviet Bloc.”

    By Germans who lived in those areas. Not Poland, assuredly. You have a warped view of history.

    “Tell me one legitimate cultured Russian person who supported Stalin!”

    The No True Scotsman Fallacy, one of my favorites.

    “The Jews who suffered in world war II were largely innocent, except for the fact that they were opponents of Europe’s traditional Christian culture.”

    So, might makes right? Well, that would fit you to a T, given this statement you wrote to those Colorado professors.

    “…every true Christian should be ready and willing to take up arms to kill the enemies of Christian society. But I believe it is far more effective to take up a pen to kill the enemies of Truth”

    More like YOUR version of truth.

    “But karma works that way. To correct an ancient Injustice of Jewish savagery in the Old Testament, 3000 years later fully innocent Jews have to pay the karmic retribution. Surely you comprehend this principle?”

    Something that is irrational and illogical. You advocate the murder of newborns, young boys/girls, and the elderly, all to satisfy your karma bloodlust? That is other than normal.

    “If you were as smart as you are stubborn and arrogant, you would truly be a genius and Unz might even publish you as one of his featured writers. As it is you’re just an annoying intellectual hemorrhoid.”

    And now you are resorting to ad hominem and projection. That is not a desired intellectual combination.

    And you still haven’t confirmed if you are a Jewish or non-Jewish Israeli. Why not?

  440. Mevashir says:

    My friend, I don’t know how to help you. I’ve gone out of my way to be candid with you but you constantly hurl more hysterical sounding questions against me.

    The reason I have different domains is because I don’t own a computer. I go around town to libraries and other places with computers that I can use. I also take my cell phone and go to Starbucks and other locations that have Wi-Fi that I can communicate on.

    [MORE]

    None of this would be necessary if I weren’t being censored by TUR.

    I AM AN AMERICAN JEW WHO MOVED TO ISRAEL AFTER COLLEGE, BECAME ULTRA-ORTHODOX, AND AFTER 18 YEARS IN THAT MOVEMENT WAS BAPTIZED AS A CHRISTIAN. THAT WAS TWENTY YEARS AGO. I DO NOT CURRENTLY ATTEND ANY CHURCH AND HAVE LITTLE TO NOTHING TO DO WITH AMERICAN CHRISTIANS BECAUSE THEY ARE NOT ENLIGHTENED IN WAYS THAT I RESPECT. I HAVE MY OWN SPIRITUAL RELATIONSHIP WITH JESUS AND OUR LOVING AND MERCIFUL FATHER GOD IN HEAVEN.

    I have written about my life story and many other things on my blog. You’re welcome to peruse it. My email address also is there and you are welcome to email me outside of this thread, which is very cumbersome for me to try to interact on: http://www.mevashir.home.blog

    I also have posted more than 2,000 comments on this website under my handle MEVASHIR. You can look at my comments. Many of them are rather insightful. If you want to know about me you’re going to have to work at it. I’m not going to reinvent the wheel for you.

    Also, you demand total disclosure for me but I know nothing about you. Is Corvinus your last name? Where do you live? What is your religious or cultural background? I only ask you these things because you are pestering me. I don’t really care about them because I judge people’s ideas on their own merits.

    About the Holocaust, I do not condone what the Germans did to the civilian Jews of Europe. But I also understand why they did these things because Jews are cultural enemies of European Christendom. This is something I’ve come to understand better by reading articles on this website.

    If you ever travel to Israel, you will see Jews there arguing all the time about the reasons for the Holocaust. Secular Jews blame the ultra-Orthodox for living as parasites in Europe and resisting Zionism. The ultra-Orthodox blame secular Jews for abandoning Torah and Zionists for embracing nationalism before the Messiah returns. Each side viciously castigates the other for causing the horrific losses to the Jewish community in world war II.

    I am only continuing in this time-honored Jewish tradition of trying to understand why this calamity occurred. The idea being if Jews are God’s chosen people, as they believe, then why did God hide his face from their travails during the era of Hitler? It’s a fair and reasonable question. It’s ultimately a question of metaphysics. Every idea proposed is speculative. That’s the nature of inquiry.

    When I mentioned the karma from Jews killing so many innocent non-Jews in the Old Testament, there actually is a much more recent karmic reality that I think pertains to the Holocaust. Which is that the Jewish rabbis were responsible indirectly for all of the Christian Martyrs in the early centuries of the church when so many Christians were martyred for their faith by the pagan Roman government. And the reason Jews are responsible is that the Jewish rabbis, who had enormous influence upon the Roman government, lobbied that government to withhold the privilege of being exempted from Emperor worship from the Christian community, claiming that they were idolaters and did not deserve this privilege enjoyed by the rest of the Jewish community. Jews were never given an ultimatum to worship Caesar. But the Christians were because the Jewish rabbis demanded that they be excluded from their special exemption status.

    I don’t know how many Christians were martyred in the early church. There’s a book called MESSIAH CONSPIRACY by Phillip Moore that suggests it may have been a few million. If so then it’s striking how parallel that is to the Jewish suffering in world war II. It seems to me you can make a strong metaphysical argument that the unfortunate suffering of Jews in world war II seems to be a direct karmic retribution for what the Jewish community inflicted on the early Christians 2000 years earlier:
    http://www.ramsheadpress.com/html/mes.html

    I also invite you to do some research. Try googling “sexual decadence of Weimar Germany”. This is a very long article written by a British academic calling herself Lasha Darkmoon documenting the Jewish role in turning Berlin into the most decadent and depraved city in Europe. Jews were prominent in running the cabarets the theaters and the brothels. German economic desperation was so great that mothers and daughters would sell themselves together into prostitution. Very often rich Jews were the pimps masterminding this sordid trade. I also have heard that Warsaw was the abortion capital of Europe and Jewish doctors were largely responsible for promoting this dark activity.

    (Google David Duke’s article “Rabbi lapin Hitler and the Jews” that makes a similar argument by a leader of the American Orthodox Jewish community.)

    Jews like Sigmund Freud and others whose names escape me challenged time-honored sacred European Christian values, deconstructed the civilization, and exposed the dark underside of the human personality. All these things were grave threats to European culture. From reading so many different articles on this website and others, I’ve come to appreciate that the national socialists in Germany were trying desperately to plug the dike from flooding their country and all of Europe with a culture of immorality hedonism communism cynicism and anti-heroism.

    Of course nobody wants to see old people women and children in slave labor camps. But it’s a principle in the Jewish community that Jews are judged collectively by God for the sins of their leaders. And if prominent Jews did things that threatened the safety and security of European civilization, as I have come to believe from my studies over the past 20 years, then the German backlash was only to be expected. The rabbis say once the angel of death is given permission to go forth he kills the righteous and the wicked indiscriminately, and I think that’s a good way to understand the tragedy of the Jewish experience in world war II.

    The European Rabbi after whom my Jerusalem yeshiva was named, called Our Samayach, predicted in the early 1900’s that the Jews were so destabilizing European civilization that a fire storm would come out of Berlin to consume the community. He stated these words thirty years before the outbreak of world war II.

    Check out the writings of historian John Wear, some of whose articles are featured on this website. He points out that the Allies committed enormous atrocities against Germany in world war II. He says 15 million Germans perished during and after this war. Their cities were bombed into rubble in violation of many war conventions about not attacking civilians. The Allies certainly do not have clean hands and the Jewish Holocaust narrative attempts to hijack all global sympathy towards their small community and to minimize the global tragedy of that horrible war.

    At any rate, it’s so cumbersome for me to try to comment on this website, constantly having to find new Wi-Fi venues so I can post anonymously, that I really want to bow out. I’ve had a good run for two years when I was able to post a lot of very interesting comments and I’m grateful for that. But right now I feel like I’m being chased off the field and that’s fine. I don’t want to respond to any further enquiries from you. But if you contact me via my blog and email address I will be happy to continue our conversation.

    I think you have a good soul and you are sensitive to human suffering and are justly horrified by the Jewish experience during wo