The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 Spencer J. Quinn Archive
Solzhenitsyn’s Two Hundred Years Together
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments

Weaponizing History

Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn
Two Hundred Years Together
Moscow: Vagrius, 2005

No sane person wants to lie. Aside from whatever harm lying might cause, lying also chips away at a person’s dignity. Knowing that your words will quickly mold to a model other than Truth somehow cheapens you — as if any model will do. Expediency, authority, greed . . . it’s hard to think of circumstances under which lying about non-private matters doesn’t cheapen a person. Put person X under these conditions, and he’ll say whatever you want him to say. How’s that for a human being? Nothing exalts more than knowing that your words will serve Truth and only Truth.

Dissidents often struggle with this when discussing the Jewish Question. We want to tell the truth. On the other hand, our message would be much more powerful if only we could omit this inconvenient fact or embellish that disappointing one. As dissidents, we wish to put forth a realistic depiction of Jews, without spite or bias, to uncover their net negative impact on our politics, and, to a lesser extent, our culture. This is the first step to freeing ourselves from the Jewish yoke, so to speak. And if we are telling the truth, then we can afford to show more than one side of the story and still be persuasive.

This seems to encapsulate Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn’s approach to the Jewish Question as it relates to Russia in his classic text Two Hundred Years Together. In this volume (which is still not properly translated into English), Solzhenitsyn reviews the history of Russian Jewry and places much of the blame for the October Revolution, the atrocities of the early Soviet period, and subversive Left-wing behavior in general squarely on the shoulders of Jews. He also, perhaps most importantly for him, exonerates much of Tsarist Russia from the charge of anti-Semitism which never seems to stop oozing from Jewish pens. That a writer of Solzhenitsyn’s towering stature took on a project which directly refutes the myth of perpetual Jewish victimhood and reverses the blame typically reserved for white gentiles should be nothing less than a triumph for the Right. Relatively minor figures who write and speak on the Jewish Question — as brilliant as they often are — can be deplatformed, smeared, and ultimately ignored. Solzhenitsyn, on the other hand, was for several years in the 1970s the most famous dissident in the world. Since his death in 2008, his reputation as an author, historian, Christian, and patriot remains impeccable. He cannot be so easily ignored.

Dissidents on the Right should therefore piggyback on Solzhenitsyn’s fame and use his name as often as possible when combating the Left on the battlefield of ideas — especially when it comes to the Jewish Question. And this is where Two Hundred Years Together comes in.

But what if this would be a misuse of Two Hundred Years Together? Despite what many of his more hysterical critics say, Solzhenitsyn was no anti-Semite. There are many passages in this work that show justice, even tenderness, towards Jews. He does have great respect for them. He just wishes to set the record straight — a record that the Jews themselves have warped with their abuses of history.

But what if sticking scrupulously to the Truth as Solzhenitsyn does won’t be enough? What if the Jews themselves rarely do this and will not hesitate to publish material of questionable scholarship but unquestionable defamation against whites simply because it is in their ethnic interests to do so? In fact, it is a common trope among Jewish writers such as Bernard Lewis (Semites and Anti-Semites), Robert Wistrich (Antisemitism: The Longest Hatred), and Daniel Goldhagen (The Devil that Never Dies), and many others to speak about anti-Semitism not as a rational response to Jewish hegemony but as if it’s an a priori evil in the black hearts of white gentiles.

Despite being profoundly dishonest, this approach works. It holds sway among the Jews themselves and since World War II has helped to browbeat the West into submission to Jewish ethnic interests.

In an example of how Solzhenitsyn does not take this approach in Two Hundred Years Together, he frequently cites Jewish author Josef Biekerman who comes across as Solzhenitsyn’s Semitic doppelganger. He is ethnocentric yet willing to speak out about the abuses of power in which his own people indulge (which Solzhenitsyn does to great extent in his Red Wheel opus). As co-founder of the Patriotic Alliance of Russian Jews in the 1920s, Biekerman vowed to combat Bolshevism not merely because he feared it would increase anti-Semitism but also because he empathetically felt that it would be bad for Russia and Russians. His colleague Isaak Levin openly called for an examination of the Jewish role in the October Revolution. Jewish writer Danil Pasmanik, who authored a book about the Jews and the Russian Revolution, professed heartfelt concern for the “unending sorrow of the Russian citizen,” and stated that Jews “cannot flourish while the country disintegrates around us.” The book these men published, Russia and the Jews, challenges Jews, especially radical, secular, Left-wing Jews, to reject the evil in their hearts.

“It is time we understood that crying and wailing . . . is mostly [evidence] of emotional infirmity, or a lack of culture of the soul . . . You are not alone in this world, and your sorrow cannot fill the entire universe . . . When you put on a display, only your own grief, only your own pain, it shows . . . disrespect to others’ grief, to others’ sufferings.”

These were truly righteous Jews, and Solzhenitsyn admires them not only for their honesty and compassion, but also because of their lack of self-hate (a theme he discusses at length in his essay “Repentance and Self-Limitation in the Life of Nations” in his From Under the Rubble collection). Unfortunately, Biekerman, Levin, Pasmanik, and others like them were voices in the wilderness when it came to mainstream Jewish opinion. They seemed to accomplish little other than to inflame resentment among other Jews. They were accused of “attack[ing] their own compatriots,” and were smeared as “anti-Semites” and “enemies of the Jewish people,” and so on. Solzhenitsyn recognizes the tragedy in this, but also seems too enamored with the possibility of rapprochement between Russians and Jews to become as aggressive towards Jews qua Jews as the Jews themselves were to Biekerman, Levin, and Pasmanik.

I must admit, this is tempting, given how the majority of Jews don’t behave like the enemy of whites and have contributed greatly to Western culture through their talent, energy, and capital. It is very easy to admire them when imagining men like Josef Biekerman being the rule rather than the exception. Many convincing arguments can be spun from this false supposition.

In Two Hundred Years Together, Solzhenitsyn is essentially more concerned about telling the truth than winning the argument.

Over a decade after his death, however, white dissidents in the West are beginning to realize that they can no longer afford to be correct if being correct is not enough to win the argument — that is, to persuade a critical mass of whites of the necessity of counter-Semitism. We are swiftly losing our majorities in our homelands to hostile invaders who wish ultimately to subjugate us — and, sadly, many wealthy and influential Jews remain on the vanguard of this invasion. Even more sadly, the majority of diaspora Jews, if their voting patterns tell us anything, actually support this invasion. Perhaps if Russia in the 1990s had been more like Western Europe of the 2020s, Solzhenitsyn would have written Two Hundred Years Together with a little more urgency.

This is not to be critical of Solzhenitsyn. The value and importance of Two Hundred Years Together cannot be overstated. Along with The Gulag Archipelago, it is perhaps his most important non-fiction work. Rather, I suggest that the Dissident Right use Two Hundred Years Together as a weapon against Jews — even if Solzhenitsyn himself would have disapproved of this tactic. Can we afford not to? Perhaps if Jews like Josef Biekerman were the rule and not the exception we could. But sadly this is counter-factual. Therefore it makes sense to use the Jews’ insidious methods against them and focus on only those elements of Truth which suit our argument. This is a cultural war, after all, and since when is it considered honorable to tell the truth to your enemy during war?

What follows is a simple accounting of the most noteworthy Jewish misdeeds found in Two Hundred Years Together. Not included will be the more common historical tropes involving Jews, for example as usurers, pimps, alcohol merchants, and unscrupulous exploiters of the poor. Also not included will be the many entertaining pages Solzhenitsyn dedicates to nineteenth-century Jews as tax cheats, draft dodgers, grievance mongers, and shockingly incompetent agriculturalists (the latter being part of the Russian government’s futile efforts to assimilate its Jewish population). Finally, we won’t include all the instances in which the Tsar or the Russian government either gave in to the demands of revolutionaries or acted on behalf of the Jews. Instead, we will focus mostly on the acts of terror and atrocity attributed to Jews during the Soviet and pre-Soviet periods, which were of most immediate interest to Solzhenitsyn. These periods should be of most immediate interest to modern dissidents as well, given how the leftward lurch of Russian society in 1900s, 1910s, and 1920s is finding an eerie analog in the West a century later.This is not to be critical of Solzhenitsyn. The value and importance of Two Hundred Years Together cannot be overstated. Along with The Gulag Archipelago, it is perhaps his most important non-fiction work. Rather, I suggest that the Dissident Right use Two Hundred Years Together as a weapon against Jews — even if Solzhenitsyn himself would have disapproved of this tactic. Can we afford not to? Perhaps if Jews like Josef Biekerman were the rule and not the exception we could. But sadly this is counter-factual. Therefore it makes sense to use the Jews’ insidious methods against them and focus on only those elements of Truth which suit our argument. This is a cultural war, after all, and since when is it considered honorable to tell the truth to your enemy during war?

Perhaps when confronted with the twin myths of Jewish innocence and victimhood, this information could help convince the uninitiated of the lies and hatred which bolster both. And for the initiated, the knowledgeable, the dissident, perhaps the most trenchant passages in Two Hundred Years Together will arm him or her with the information which could help spark the counter-Semitic revolution that is so desperately needed in the West today.

• • •

Chapter Six: In the Russian Revolutionary Movement

Despite being poorly represented among Left-wing radicals prior to the 1870s, Jews quickly grew in prominence among them during the 1870s. Students such as V. Yokhelson, A. Zundelevich, Mark Natanson, Leon Deutsch, and others became energetic organizers of the revolutionary movement. Solzhenitsyn notes how almost none of these Jews supported revolution due to poverty — they, in large part, came from wealthy families. He also notes how, unlike Christian revolutionaries, few Jewish ones suffered a break from their families because of their activities. On the whole, Jewish parents — regardless of their occupations — tolerated their children’s subversive activities. These revolutionaries quickly turned from their religious, patriarchal, and traditionalist roots after the slightest contact with Russian culture. Egalitarian nihilism made it too tempting for them. In many ways, Solzhenitsyn blames assimilation with Russians for bringing out the worst in Jews. And while demonstrating that these early Jewish revolutionaries had tremendous drive and talent, he also describes how mentally unbalanced many of them were.

After the 1881 assassination of Tsar Alexander II and the widespread pogroms which followed, however, a critical mass of Jews then rose to pursue one goal: “the destruction of the current political regime.” Jews rapidly established international networks dedicated to Marxist and socialist revolution, and these networks had a profoundly negative impact upon Russia. In fact, during the 1880s and 1890s, Russian revolutionaries began to rely more and more on Jews as “detonator[s] of revolution.” The revolutionary movement became disproportionately Jewish. Marxist historian M. N. Pokrovsky estimated that by the late nineteenth century, Jews (who made up less than five percent of the population of Russia) made up between a quarter and a third of all the revolutionary parties. In 1903, Russian statesman Sergei Witte told Zionist Theodore Herzl that Jews constituted no less than half of all revolutionaries. In 1905, General N. Sukhotin, the commander of Russian forces in Siberia, calculated that of all the political prisoners exiled to Siberia, thirty-seven percent were Jews. Solzhenitsyn also cites various Jewish sources that attest to the heavy Jewish involvement in the revolutionary movement during the pre-Soviet period.

Chapter Nine: During the Revolution of 1905

In this chapter, Solzhenitsyn demonstrates how ravenous Russia’s Jewish population had become for armed conflict with the Tsarist regime by the turn of the twentieth century. The belligerence on display is shocking not only for its own sake, but also because the Jews barely discuss it themselves. Because of this, this crucial episode has been left out of history almost entirely.

Solzhenitsyn dedicates several pages to the deadly 1903 pogrom in Gomel, Belarus. While the official investigation by the Russian authorities claimed that Jews and Russians alike shared blame for the violence, Solzhenitsyn, using contemporaneous police reports, shows that armed and organized gangs of Jews had instigated the pogrom against Russians. These groups had been formed by the Bund, which previously that year had organized a festival celebrating the anniversary of Tsar Alexander II’s assassination. During an argument between a Jew and a Russian peasant in an outdoor market, the Jew spat in the face of the Russian. A brawl ensued, during which the surrounding Jews blew whistles, a clear sign for attack. Soon enough, the place was swarming with armed Jews, who beat the outnumbered Russians mercilessly, men, women, children, and elderly alike. Solzhenitsyn describes how a Jew snuck up behind a Russian and stabbed him in the neck, killing him. In another instance, a Russian girl was dragged down the street by her hair. And when the police arrived, the Jews fired live rounds and hurled stones at them. This went on for a day, and all the casualties were Russian. What’s worse for the Jewish victimhood narrative, when the troops arrived, their main purpose was to protect the wealthy Jewish part of town from Russian reprisals — and to show their appreciation, the Jews fired shots and threw stones at them too.

Of course, the reason why the Jews were so irate at that point in time was because of the anti-Jewish pogrom in Kishinev in modern-day Moldova, a few months prior. But modern dissidents should not concern themselves with this. Why? Because Jews rarely consider the reasons behind any anti-Jewish actions taken by gentiles, pogroms or otherwise. For them, such behavior simply springs from irrational gentile minds. This is how Jews weaponize history. Well, thanks to Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, two can play at that game.

From the Jewish Virtual Library, an example of how Jews weaponize history by presenting only that information that suits their ethnic interests.
From the Jewish Virtual Library, an example of how Jews weaponize history by presenting only that information that suits their ethnic interests.

Several times in Chapter Nine, Solzhenitsyn relays how Jews instigated conflict by firing their revolvers at police as well as by committing acts of terror and attacking innocent Russian peasants and workers. He names Nissel Farber — who threw a bomb at a police station, killing two and wounding three — and Aron Eline — who threw a bomb at police, wounding seven. He describes several other similar attacks by Jewish terrorists. This kind of provocation immediately invalidates any claim to Jewish innocence and Jewish victimhood.

Around the turn of the twentieth century, the new breed of Jewish radical became much more influential and radical than before. Solzhenitsyn labels Grigory Gershuni and Mikhail Gotz as terrorists and describes how they and others took charge of many of the revolutionary parties throughout Russia, especially the Socialist Revolutionary Party (SR). Gershuni oversaw the assassination of two governors and Minister of the Interior Dmitry Sipyagin as well as one failed assassination attempt. While these revolutionaries often relied on Russian assassins, one of their primary bomb makers was Jewish. Solzhenitsyn seizes upon the irony of the Jew Pinhas Rutenberg, who trained Jewish terrorists in Russia and oversaw the execution of the double agent priest Georgy Gapon, and then moved to Palestine, became an engineer, and brought electricity to the region. “There, he shows that he is capable of building,” Solzhenitsyn writes, “but in his early years, in Russia, he certainly does not work as an engineer. He destroys!” Jews also made up the great bulk of theorists who would tirelessly propound anarchism, socialism, and other disruptive ideologies. These ideologies often took on religious proportions. And although the most active of these Jewish terrorists were young, Solzhenitsyn points out how the older generations of Jews continued to tolerate or support them.

Prior to the failed revolution of 1905, the Bund had actually declared war on Russia in one of its proclamations:

The revolution has begun. It burned in the capital, its flames covering the whole country. . . . To arms! Storm the armories and seize all the weapons. . . . Let all the streets become battlefields!

The press and the local orators echoed this sentiment. Solzhenitsyn relays an incident involving a Russian soldier who returned home to Moscow after being held in captivity in Japan:

At the mere sight of this officer in battle dress, the welcome which he received from the Muscovite crowd was expressed in these terms: “Spook! Suck up! The Tsar’s lackey!” During a large meeting in the Theater Plaza, “the orator called for struggle and destruction”; another speaker began his speech by shouting” “Down with the autocracy!” “His accent betrayed his Jewish origins, but the Russian public listened to him, and no one found anything to reply to him.” Nods of agreement met the insults uttered against the Tsar and his family; Cossacks, policemen, and soldiers, all without exception — no mercy! And all the Muscovite newspapers called for armed struggle.

One final anecdote in this damning chapter. Solzhenitsyn tells of an Alexander Schlichter, a Jewish revolutionary, who instigated a railway strike that paralyzed rail traffic to several cities, including Moscow. This Schlichter had also made threats to Kyiv workers to go on strike, raised money from students to purchase arms, and established “flying detachments” whose purpose was to disrupt the city of Kyiv to “prepare the armed resistance to the forces of order.”

This Alexander Schlichter ultimately became a Bolshevik and was, years later, the Agriculture Commissioner in Ukraine during the time of the Holodomor, in which over fifteen million people perished.

Solzhenitsyn states it succinctly: “The revolutionary effervescence that had seized Russia was undoubtedly stirred up by that which reigned among the Jews.”

The Duma, Partisan Press, & Beilis Trial

Chapter Ten: The Period of the Duma

Despite including little by way of terrorism or atrocity, chapter ten is one of the most revealing and fascinating chapters in all of Two Hundred Years Together. It simultaneously demonstrates both Jewish perception and distortion of reality, and just how devastating this can be.

The chapter begins with Tsar Nicholas’ October Manifesto of 1905 which, among other things, promised basic civil rights to all Russian citizens and established the Russian parliament known as the Duma. This, and the establishment of the first Russian constitution a year later, signified the ongoing liberalization of the Russian government, which was following similar changes among the Russian intelligentsia. And this leftward shift, slow and ponderous as it was, allowed the Jewish Question to be openly discussed and considered more than ever.

Yet when hearing the truculent rhetoric of the Duma and its significant Jewish element — as well as that of the Jewish-run Russian press — it would seem as if Russia were backsliding in feudalism. Jewish interests were represented largely by the Cadet Party (“Cadet” being the informal name of the Constitutional Democratic Party), both with Jewish representatives coming from the Pale of Settlement and their allies among the Russian intelligentsia. Solzhenitsyn describes the Cadet Party as the juncture where the groups mingled freely. Their stated goal was equal rights, especially for Jews. Nevertheless, the Tsar’s appointment of Pyotr Stolypin as Prime Minister belied how disingenuous the Duma really was.

Under Stolypin, real measures had been taken to alleviate restrictions placed upon Jews. Stolypin himself had limited ability in this regard, since the Tsar in 1906 had expressed sympathy for the Jewish cause but insisted that reforms must be implemented by the Duma. Despite having implemented administrative measures to ease restrictions upon Jews and believing that pro-Jewish policy in general would deter Jewish radicalism, Stolypin had no choice but to comply. Yet, ironically, the Duma refused! The Tsar and Russian Prime Minister, the two most powerful men in the empire, had given its parliament — and, by extension, its pro-Jewish Cadet Party — freedom to legislate Jewish equality, and the parliament chose not to. Why?

Difficult to explain this other than by a political calculation: the aim being to fight the Autocracy, the interest was to raise more and more the pressure on the Jewish Question, and to certainly not resolve it: ammunition was thus kept in reserve. These brave knights of liberty reasoned in these terms: to avoid that the lifting of restrictions imposed on the Jews would diminish their ardor in battle. For these knights without fear and without reproach, the most important, was indeed the fight against the power.

Between the lines, we should read that one should never take the Left, especially the Jewish Left, at its word. Any Progressive agenda is merely a smokescreen for destroying traditional gentile power structures and replacing them with totalitarianism. Solzhenitsyn also notes the irony behind Stolypin’s assassination at the hands of the Jew Mordko Bogrov — as well as the Russian Jewish community’s tacit approval of the assassination. In fact, Bogrov’s father, despite being a wealthy capitalist himself who had benefited greatly from the Russian system, publicly declared that he was proud of his son.

Cheering on the Duma’s refusal to create a smooth transition to equal rights for Jews was the Jewish-run press. In many ways, Solzhenitsyn’s description of how Jews dishonestly manipulate public opinion to serve their own ethnic interests presages how they do the same thing today in the West. This indicates that this could very well be a fundamental characteristic of Jewish diaspora news media which traverses centuries and thousands of miles. Solzhenitsyn describes how the newspapers “systematically distorted the debates in the Duma, largely opening their columns to the deputies of the left and showering them with praise, while to the deputies of the right they allowed only a bare minimum.”

The predominance of Jews among the press corps covering the Duma became a running joke after a Right-wing deputy referred to the press box as “this Pale of Settlement of the Jews” in a speech.

Solzhenitsyn sums up the destructive nature of the Jewish-run press thusly:

The following statement was attributed to Napoleon: “Three opposition papers are more dangerous than one hundred thousand enemy soldiers.” This sentence applies largely to the Russo-Japanese War. The Russian press was openly defeatist throughout the conflict and in each of its battles. Even worse, it did not conceal its sympathies for terrorism and revolution.

This press, totally out of control in 1905, was considered during the period of the Duma, if we are to believe [former Russian Prime Minister Sergei] Witte, as essentially “Jewish” or “semi-Jewish”; or, to be more precise, as a press dominated by left-wing or radical Jews who occupied key positions. In November 1905, D. I. Pikhno, editor in chief for twenty-five years of the Russian newspaper The Kievian and a connoisseur of the press of his time, wrote: “The Jews . . . have bet heavily on the card of revolution . . . . Those, among the Russians, who think seriously, have understood that in such moments, the press represents a force and that this force is not in their hands, but in that of their adversaries; that they speak on their behalf throughout Russia and have forced people to read them because there is nothing else to read; and as one cannot launch a publication in one day, [the opinion] has been drowned beneath this mass of lies, incapable of finding itself there.”

Solzhenitsyn ends this chapter with the way in which the Jewish press covered the famous Beilis Trial from 1911. Similar to the Dreyfus Affair from earlier in the century, a most-likely innocent Jew was charged with a crime — in this case the torture, mutilation, and murder of a 12-year-old boy — in an atmosphere steeped in classic anti-Semitism. The murder occurred on the property of a Jewish-owned factory, and quickly blood libel accusations were being made by the local population. This led to the arrest of factory worker Menahem Beilis. Solzhenitsyn chronicles many of the bizarre twists of the investigation and ensuing trial, and admits that not only was the prosecution’s case dubious, but Beilis was accused in large part because he was Jewish.

Beyond the person of Beilis, the trial turned in fact into an accusation against the Jewish people as a whole — and, since then, the atmosphere around the investigation and then the trial became superheated, the affair took on an international dimension, gained the whole of Europe, and then America.

So we have an innocent Jewish defendant, corrupt and incompetent gentile authorities, and a vengeful, seemingly anti-Semitic, gentile public. This was, in effect, the perfect storm in which the Jewish press could lose all of restraint, and Solzhenitsyn provides some examples. Ultimately, an all-gentile (and mostly peasant) jury acquitted Beilis. But this, of course, did not exonerate the Russians of anti-Semitism in the eyes of Jewish writers. Note how Bernard Lewis, in his Semites and Anti-Semites, describes the affair:

Another case . . .was the arrest in 1911 of a Jewish brickmaker called Mendel Beilis, in Kiev in the Ukraine, for the ritual murder of a Christian boy. This followed after the temporary halting of the pogroms in Russia under both international and domestic liberal pressures, and represented a new effort and a new direction on the part of the anti-Semites, by now entrenched at the highest reaches of the imperial Russian government. Two years were spent in preparing the case, which was concocted by an anti-Semitic organization, in cooperation with the minister of justice and the police. It was opposed by an impressive array of Russian liberals and socialists, including such figures as the writer Maxim Gorki and the psychologist Ivan Petrovich Pavlov. The trial opened at the end of 1913, and, like the Dreyfus trial in France, became the focus for a conflict between opposing political forces in Russia, and the cause of widespread protests in the democratic countries of the West. It was no doubt partly because of the latter that the trial ended in an acquittal of the accused, “for lack of evidence,” and with no decision on the question of ritual murder.

So clearly, the entire Beilis Affair can be wrapped up in Lewis’ simplistic Jew Good-Gentile Bad paradigm. Indeed, there is some truth behind the claim that the whole thing was a regrettable mess that brought out the worst on both sides. And, it must be said that Beilis does appear to have been innocent.

However, the tremendous value of Solzhenitsyn’s analysis emerges when we see how he includes information that Lewis and others do not. Not only did finding this information require some legwork. It also evinces a keen understanding of the weaknesses behind the Jewish narrative. First, Solzhenitsyn shares with us the truly bizarre and horrific nature of this murder.

. . . there are forty-seven punctures on his body, which indicate a certain knowledge of anatomy—they were made to the temple, to the veins and arteries of the neck, to the liver, to the kidneys, to the lungs, to the heart, with the clear intention of emptying him of his blood as long as he was still alive, and in addition — according to the traces left by the blood flow — in a standing position (tied and gagged, of course).

So, this outrage, combined with the fact that the victim was a child, could perhaps explain the heated reactions from the local community better than anti-Semitism can. Jewish writers like Lewis would want one to believe that this was a run-of-the-mill murder. It most definitely was not.

Second, Solzhenitsyn offers a coda to this affair which utterly undresses the myth of Jewish innocence and victimhood. While Beilis emigrated, ultimately to the United States, and died of natural causes at age sixty, other players in this affair were not so lucky. During the early Soviet period, the now-former Russian Justice Minister (whom Lewis mentions above) was shot by the Bolsheviks. The prosecutor was sent to a concentration camp, after which his fate is unknown. And, in 1919, Vera Cheberyak, a witness for the prosecution, was interrogated over her role in the Beilis affair by Jewish Chekists. After refusing to change her testimony and denying that she had been bribed, she was summarily executed.

As with much of volume two of Two Hundred Years Together, Solzhenitsyn demonstrates how Imperial Russia was highly imperfect under the Tsars, but remains far superior in many respects to the Soviet Union — one of which obviously being criminal justice. Gentiles wrongly accuse a Jew, but still give him his day in court and acquit him, and Jews everywhere scream and protest. Later, Jews don’t give a gentile her day in court — and, even worse, blow her brains out with a pistol shot — and Jews say nothing.

With this kind of double standard, how can we trust the Jewish narrative on anything?

It seems to make sense that Lewis would dishonestly exclude such salient information in his cursory analysis of the Beilis trial. It would undermine his philo-Semitic, anti-gentilic agenda, something Solzhenitsyn does quite well in Two Hundred Years Together.

Solzhenitsyn takes one final, well-aimed dig at the press:

Beilis was acquitted by peasants, those Ukrainian peasants accused of having participated in the pogroms against the Jews at the turn of the century, and who were soon to know the collectivization and organized famine of 1932-1933 — a famine that journalists have ignored and that has not been included in the liabilities of this regime.

Smashing the Balance

By the time the reader begins the second volume of Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn’s Two Hundred Years Together, he’s aware of a complex yet fragile balance established by the author in volume one. Jews and Russians have shared the same empire and language for centuries, but not without conflict brought about by their different natures and the exigencies of history. Solzhenitsyn takes pains to remain objective despite his clear sympathy for the Russian point of view. Often, when he reveals the misdeeds of Jews, he demonstrates how Russians are not without sin either. The first three chapters of the second volume (thirteen through fifteen), however, smash this balance and reveal Solzhenitsyn almost desperately trying to maintain it as if reconstructing a house of cards while it crumbles. These chapters span the two revolutions of 1917 and mark the culmination of changes among Russian Jewry which began in the 1870s — a change that took Russian Jews from calculating self-interest and detachment to assimilation, radicalism, and ultimately wanton destruction. The historical material is too damning to view it any other way. It embarrasses any attempt at evenhandedness. Solzhenitsyn never stops making them, of course. But knowing what’s coming in the years ahead — the Russian Civil War, the terror famines, the gulags, and the Great Terror, among other things — it becomes impossible to walk away from Two Hundred Years Together and not lay disproportionate blame for the catastrophe that was the Soviet Union upon the shoulders of Jews.

Solzhenitsyn makes it clear that one of the first orders of business for the victors in the February Revolution was Jewish equality and a ban on anti-Semitism. Anyone who showed even the slightest fealty towards the Tsar, Christianity, the old Russian Empire, and, by extension, Russian culture, history, or identity, was at the very least suspect. Right away, things improved for the Jews. With so many of them already in the cities, and with so many of them sympathetic to the Revolution, it should come as no shock that a multitude of professional opportunities opened up for them practically overnight. Jewish groups proliferated in the cities and the military. Jewish enthusiasm ran high, especially abroad, where financiers such as Jacob Schiff, the Rothschilds, Baron Ginzberg, and others gave millions to the cause. Tens of thousands of Jews returned to Russia to take part in the Revolution. At the same time, however, the fledgling government began hunting known judeophobes, including the prominent men who presided over the infamous Beilis trial from several years earlier.

The Right, in general, was also targeted for cultural annihilation. Rightist newspapers were forced to close down for accurately reporting the links between the Bolsheviks and the Germans during World War I. Even more insidiously. . .

[t]he chairman of the Union of the Russian People, Dmitry Dubrovin, was arrested and his archive was seized; the publishers of the far-right newspapers Glinka-Yanchevsky and Poluboyarinova were arrested too; the bookstores of the Monarchist Union were simply burned down.

And, of course, Jews were everywhere. Solzhenitsyn describes how, during his exhaustive studies of the February Revolution and the memoirs of its participants, many Jewish names leaped out at him. He provides several eyewitness accounts that corroborate this observation, including one from V. D. Nabokov (the novelist’s father). An American pastor named Simons, who was in Petrograd during the revolution, testified before the US Senate that

. . . everywhere in Petrograd you could see groups of Jews, standing on benches, soap boxes, and such, making speeches . . . There had been restrictions on the rights of Jews to live in Petrograd, but after the Revolution, they came in droves, and the majority of agitators were Jews.

Solzhenitsyn also produces numbers to support these claims. Among the thirty active members of the Executive Committee of the Soviets of Workers’ and Soldiers’ Deputies in Petrograd immediately after the Revolution, more than half were Jews and fewer than one quarter were Russians. Solzhenitsyn also points out that at the Socialist Revolutionary Congress of May and June 1917, thirty-nine of the 318 delegates were Jews (over twelve percent). Of the Central Committee elected during that Congress, seven out twenty were Jews (thirty-five percent). In April 1917, Jews made up a third of the Central Committee of the Bolsheviks. They also comprised a majority of the revolutionaries in those two trains which sped through wartime Germany towards Russia after the Tsar’s abdication. One of those trains contained Lenin. In October 1917, when the decision was made to launch the Bolshevik Revolution, Solzhenitsyn lists six Jews among the twelve conspirators. After the Revolution, a young Lazar Kaganovich destroyed the photographic evidence of the Council of the Assembly of Leningrad, explaining that “the vast majority of the presidium at the table were Jews.” And, of course, Jews made up a clear half of the first Soviet Politburo. It must be remembered that at that point in history, Jews made up less than five percent of the Russian population.

A small pile of Bolsheviks had now come to power and taken authority, but their control was still brittle. Whom could they trust in the government? Whom could they call on for aid? The seeds of the answer lay in the creation in January 1918 of a special People’s Commissariat from the members of the Jewish Commissariat, the reason for which was expressed in Lenin’s opinion that the Bolshevik success in the revolution had been made possible because of the role of the large Jewish intelligentsia in several Russian cities. These Jews engaged in general sabotage, which was directed against Russians after the October Revolution and which proved extremely effective. Jewish elements, though certainly not the entirety of the Jewish people, saved the Bolshevik Revolution through these acts of sabotage. Lenin took this into consideration, he emphasized it in the press, and he recognized that to master the state apparatus he could succeed only because of this reserve of literate and more or less intelligent, sober new clerks.

Thus, the Bolsheviks, from the first days of their authority, called upon the Jews to assume the bureaucratic work of the Soviet apparatus — and many, many Jews answered the call. They in fact responded immediately.

As typical in Two Hundred Years Together, Solzhenitsyn provides names — and these go well beyond the famous ones such as Trotsky, Zinoviev, and Kamenev. Here we have the Jewish second tier. Under normal circumstances, minor figures such as Arkady Rozengolts, Simon Nakhimson, Zorach Greenberg, Yevgeny Kogan, and many others would hardly be worth remembering except for historians. But in Two Hundred Years Together, they become pawns on the great Jewish Question chessboard.

Throughout these three chapters, however, the reader can see Solzhenitsyn struggling to maintain his evenhandedness. His efforts get more strained as time goes on. At first, he simply denies the Jewish role in the February Revolution. “[N]o, the February Revolution was not something Jews did to the Russians, but rather it was done by the Russians themselves, which I believe I amply demonstrated in The Red Wheel.” Of course, there is much truth in this. The shortsightedness, corruption, laziness, and incompetence of the Russian leadership at the time is impossible to deny. But rarely does Solzhenitsyn attribute this downfall to outright malice. The Russians, such as Alexander Kerensky, who contributed to the first Revolution were atypical Russians, while the Jews who became revolutionaries were typical Jews.

The February Revolution was carried out by Russian hands and Russian foolishness. Yet at the same time, its ideology was permeated and dominated by the intransigent hostility to the historical Russian state that ordinary Russians didn’t have, but the Jews had.

Often in this part of the work, Solzhenitsyn remarks on the dominant “foreign element” among the revolutionaries aside from Jews — Poles, Latvians, Georgians, even Chinese. Solzhenitsyn seems to argue against himself even further when he discusses the ethnic makeup of the shadowy Executive Committee (mentioned above) which was formed only hours after the February Revolution and was indeed the real power behind the Provisional Government. The Committee’s first act was to seize control of the Russian Army. This organization was over half-Jewish, although it attempted to obscure this fact through pseudonyms. At the time, no one knew who was really ruling Russia. Despite this, Solzhenitsyn wavers between laying blame upon the foreign element, which was acting behind the scenes after the February Revolution, and the Russian element, which should have prevented the Revolution in the first place. Ultimately, he punts on this quandary, refusing to ascribe definitive blame in either direction.

This is unconvincing, largely due to Solzhenitsyn’s profound understanding of the Jewish Question and his genius for argument. This emerges during his discussion of otshchepentsy (отщепенцы), which can be translated to mean “traitor to one’s blood and heritage.” Looking back to the revolutions of 1917, many Jews no longer deny their shamefully disproportionate participation. Instead, they endeavor to slip themselves off the hook by claiming that Trotsky and the others were otshchepentsy — not real Jews, but renegade Jews. As evidence, they will point to the not insignificant number of Jews who were also victims of the Bolsheviks. Solzhenitsyn, for argument’s sake, accepts this, but then wonders why these same Jews hesitate to apply the otshchepentsy excuse to non-Jews, and Russians in particular, for similar misdeeds.

Solzhenitsyn also notices a pattern. Jews just happen to produce a lot of otshchepentsy, don’t they? Yes, there were Russians like this, but proportionately far fewer. Solzhenitsyn also asks the delicate question of how these otshchepentsy were received by their own people at the time­, and not years later when embarrassed historians find the need to make excuses for their deceased countrymen. And, sadly, the majority of Jews during the time of the 1917 revolutions did not renounce their so-called otshchepentsy. Quite the opposite, actually. Solzhenitsyn states that there are modern Israeli historians who interpret the October Revolution as a great triumph of Jewish spirit and identity.

So much for otshchepentsy.

It seems that Solzhenitsyn’s fighting spirit gets the better of him towards the end of chapter fifteen. The same author who halfheartedly exonerated the Jews vis-à-vis the February Revolution now states that they were the driving force behind the October Revolution. Further, he reminds us that the clearly pro-Jewish stance of the Provisional Government made this second revolution entirely unnecessary for the welfare of Russian Jews. They had already achieved equality and were on track to surpass the former Russian elites in power and influence if they hadn’t already. Why did they need the October Revolution if not for unlimited power or the annihilation of Russia? In a powerful passage, Solzhenitsyn quotes a Jewish author who believes that the Jewish Bolsheviks “willfully destroyed their own souls.”

Solzhenitsyn ends this powerful chapter with a direct call for Jews everywhere to take responsibility for their past, and to renounce their “revolutionary thugs” and their “endless ranks who went into Bolshevik service to commit mass murder.”

How do we Russians take responsibility for the pogroms, for those merciless peasant arsonists, for the mad revolutionary soldiers and sailor beasts, and the Jews get to spread their hands in blameless innocence over the countless Yiddish names among the commissar-butchers who commanded the whole wretched business?

Solzhenitsyn has absolutely no time for this blatant double standard. Still, he wants nothing more than to meet the Jews halfway in this repentance and self-limitation of nations. But he insists that it be mutual. And why not? If the Jews don’t hold up their end of the bargain, then the Russians (or anyone else) have no reason to hold up theirs. And this would be a tragedy, because, according to Solzhenitsyn, without the obligation of responsibility and a true understanding of the past, all sense of national identity will be lost.

The Russian Civil War

Solzhenitsyn points out early in chapter sixteen of Two Hundred Years Together that immediately after the October Revolution, the Bolsheviks wielded fearsome, unchecked power. And it was the wanton abuse of this power that led to the unspeakable violence of the Russian Civil War and the anti-Jewish pogroms to which Russian history had no equivalent.

Right away, the Red Army was a Jewish creation. Leon Trotsky, along with Ephraim Sklyanksy and Jacov Sverdlov, founded it in 1918 with many Jews in leadership positions. Solzhenitsyn cites several Jewish sources and spends pages naming names. The first Soviet secret police, known as the Cheka, was also disproportionately Jewish in its leadership (especially in places like Kyiv where there were many Jews to begin with), as it was also disproportionately non-Russian. Trotsky himself is on record admitting to this. Solzhenitsyn names names in the Cheka as well.

He also points out how dedicated to terror the Cheka really was. The early days of the Russian Civil War Solzhenitsyn describes not as a war but as the “liquidation of a former adversary,” and the Cheka was the weapon used to effect this. It held the Russian population in mortal fear. It routinely enforced the death penalty without trial. It captured and executed innocent hostages by the thousands (sometimes by mass drownings in barges). Whenever bothering to interrogate suspects, their concern was not to reveal incriminating evidence, but to discern the suspects’ heritage and social class. One’s identity was enough to determine guilt or innocence in the jaundiced eyes of the Cheka. Solzhenitsyn quotes a certain (presumably Jewish) Schwartz promoting nothing less than genocide:

The proclaimed Red Terror should be implemented in a proletarian way. If physical extermination of all servants of Czarism and capitalism is the prerequisite for the establishment of the worldwide dictatorship of proletariat, then it wouldn’t stop us.

Solzhenitsyn quotes a Cheka order to annihilate entire villages and execute their populations. He relays estimates that in Crimea from 1917 to 1921, Red forces murdered 120,000 to 150,000 people. During the Russian Civil War, Crimea became known as the “All-Russian Cemetery.” He also includes a Jewish source who remarks on the striking change which Jewish youth underwent after the Revolution:

We were astonished to find among the Jews what we never expected from them — cruelty, sadism, unbridled violence — everything that seemed so alien to a people so detached from physical activity; those who yesterday couldn’t handle a rifle, today were among the vicious cutthroats.

Things become murky, however, in Ukraine. The Revolution and the resulting Red Terror met with great resistance there. Reactionary forces, represented mostly by the White Army, had their share of victories before their ultimate defeat. And with victory, as was the case during this time, came atrocity. In many places, Jews were blamed for the rise of Bolshevism. This resulted in a series of pogroms that dwarfed the ones of the late nineteenth century. Between 1917 and 1921, an estimated 180,000-200,000 Jews were murdered in Ukraine and what is today Belarus — but not entirely by White forces. The Red Army (believe it or not) as well as various partisan groups (often Ukrainian nationalists who fought against both White and Red) were responsible for nearly eighty-five percent of this. The remainder was caused by the Whites.

Solzhenitsyn vividly describes the horror:

Sometimes during the anti-Jewish pogroms by rebellious peasant bands, entire shtetls were exterminated with indiscriminate slaughter of children, women, and elders. After the pogromists finished with their business, peasants from surrounding villages usually arrived on wagons to join in looting the commercial goods which were often stored in large amounts in the towns because of the unsettled times. All over Ukraine rebels attacked passenger trains and often commanded communists and Jews to get out of the coach and those who did were shot right on the spot; or in checking papers of passengers, suspected Jews were ordered to pronounce “kukuruza” [кукуруза, the Russian word for corn] and those who spoke with an accent were escorted out and executed.

(Note the similarity to the famous Shibboleth episode in the equally bloody Book of Judges from the Old Testament. Coincidentally, the ancient Hebrew word Shibboleth meant an ear of corn.)

Outrages such as these accelerated the Jewish shift to the Left and forced the majority of centrist or neutral Jews to embrace the Reds. Can anyone blame them? Could this have been helped? Could any middle ground have remained during such a turbulent period? After the October Revolution, how could the average Russian peasant, now armed and part of an army, not be seething in hatred for Jews — the very people they believe stole their country from them? In fact, Solzhenitsyn describes the White Army as being “hypnotized by Trotsky” and believing that their country was now being occupied solely by Jewish Commissars.

But there was a non-insignificant number of patriotic Jews who were either sympathetic with the White cause or had actually joined White forces. Solzhenitsyn makes this point often. He also stresses how not all White forces were hostile to Jews. Rather, many tended to remain suspicious of even friendly Jews given how prominent other Jews were among the Reds. And so, in many cases, Jewish allies were either rejected or forced into humiliating supporting roles during the war. Some White generals forbade pogroms entirely, such as Alexander Kolchak in Siberia and Pyotr Wrangel in Crimea.

Sadly, this wasn’t enough. In the West, the pogroms soured public opinion of the Whites and crippled their ability to raise much-needed funds. Winston Churchill, then Britain’s Secretary of War, was sympathetic to the Russian nationalist cause, and wrote to White General Anton Denikin, explaining that the pogroms were making it difficult for him to secure support for the Whites in Parliament. Churchill also feared the influence of British Jews who were already making up a substantial portion of the British elite. Of course, the Bolshevik press took full advantage of every pogrom and did much to manipulate world opinion away from the Whites. That equally enormous Soviet atrocities did little to sway world opinion in the other direction is a testament to how tightly the Jews controlled world media even back then.

It’s a rigged game, this public opinion. Jews make ostentatious victims, but as victimizers, they lurk in the shadows like assassins. This is the two-faced beast all Rightists must face, and was something the White forces may not have understood well enough.

That being said, pogroms and a persistent, almost superstitious, Jew-hate may not have been all that doomed the Whites to defeat. But according to Solzhenitsyn, they were significant factors. When he writes that the Whites were hypnotized by Trotsky, he isn’t exaggerating much. For example, wild conspiracy theories about Trotsky worshipping the Devil and practicing Satanic rituals in the Kremlin persisted in White circles for years after the war. Without pogroms at the very least, the Whites would have been able to raise more money and make more use of Jewish talent and manpower than what they had at their disposal at the time. They also would have made Bolshevism a lot less attractive to centrist or otherwise neutral Jews. And, who knows? This might have made the difference in the war’s outcome.

White racial dissidents today can learn much from this regrettable episode. The Russian Civil War is a unique time in history since it is where racial nationalism, petty nationalism, the Left, and the Jewish Question all meet at a bloody crossroads. How could the forces of Reaction have survived this encounter? How could some semblance of normalcy have been restored in the former Russian Empire? My reading of chapter sixteen of Two Hundred Years Together tells me that a sober appreciation for the Truth — and a good deal of restraint — would have gone a long way. The enemy is the Left — in this case, the Bolsheviks. The driving force behind this enemy is, as always, the Jewish Left. But not all Jews are on the Left, and not all of the Left is Jewish. This, of course, does not mean that the Dissident Right need curry favor with Jews or even with the relatively small subset of them that is favorably disposed to Dissident Right perspectives.

What this does mean, however, is threefold:

  1. All-consuming hatred is unhealthy, immoral, and bad in and of itself. This should be an axiom not just in war but in life.
  2. All-consuming Jew-hate plays into the Left’s strengths. In any struggle against the Left, Rightist or Reactionary forces must understand that the propaganda war and the war on the ground are equally important. In at least three of the great Left-Right conflicts of the twentieth century (The Russian Civil War, World War II, and the Vietnam War) the propaganda war made the difference in favor of the Left. This is what the Left — especially the Jewish Left — is really good at. They’re much better at propaganda than the Right is, in fact. When taking the Left on, the Right needs to understand this and behave accordingly, even if the Left doesn’t have to behave accordingly. This is the price the Right has to pay for coming in second when it comes to propaganda.
  3. Any Rightist movement in conflict with the Left should do as little as possible to alienate centrist or neutral Jews. Again, this does not mean the Right should seek these people out or curry favor with them. Unabashed philo-Semitism is simply a bad look for any leader of the Right. It seems that a professed Judeo-neutral position might be the best course. It makes the radical Left less attractive, it makes Leftist propaganda harder to fabricate, and it will allow for the Right to utilize a certain amount of Jewish capital, talent, and manpower.

Solzhenitsyn laments at the end of the chapter that the hard swing of Jews towards Bolshevism and the hard swing of the Whites against the Jews “eclipsed and erased the most important benefit of a possible White victory — the sane evolution of the Russian state.”

The Bloody Red Pill

Large numbers of Jews who did not leave after the revolution failed to foresee the bloodthirstiness of the new government, though the persecution, even of socialists, was well underway. The Soviet government was as unjust and cruel then as it was to be in 1937 and 1950. But in the Twenties the bloodlust did not raise alarm or resistance in the wider Jewish population since its force was aimed not at Jewry.

Having contributed greatly to defeating the Whites in the Russian Civil War, many Soviet Jews spent the 1920s consolidating their positions within the Soviet government apparatus. In chapter eighteen of Two Hundred Years Together, Solzhenitsyn, in typical comprehensive fashion, reveals how extensive their dominance during this period really was. He calls upon contemporaneous sources which claim that in 1927 Jews made up nearly twelve percent of the Soviet government in Moscow, twenty-two percent in Ukraine, and over thirty percent in Belorussia. Much of this can be explained by the general enthusiasm many Russian Jews had for the young republic, their large presence in the major cities, and their innate intelligence and talent. This does not, however, explain the active discrimination against Russians that took place during the same time, especially in universities. This also does not explain how Jews in government consistently used their influence to aid other Jews in quasi-official ways or how the law encouraged Jews to register complaints about anti-Semitism. Most insidiously, this does not explain how non-Jews who remarked upon or criticized the disproportionate Jewish presence in government ran the risk of being labeled counter-revolutionary. And counter-revolutionaries, Solzhenitsyn reminds us, could very well come in contact with nine grams of lead.

Despite Jews making up only 5.2 percent of the Communist Party in 1922, Jewish per capita party membership (7.2 percent) was nearly double that of Russians (3.8 percent). In leadership positions among the Communists, however, the Jews truly distinguished themselves. According to Pravda in the same year:

. . . at the 11th Communist Party Congress, Jews made up 14.6 percent of the voting delegates, 18.3 percent of the non-voting delegates, and 26 percent of those elected to the Central Committee at the conference.

Pravda, 1930:

The portrait of the 25-member Presidium of the Communist Party included eleven Russians, eight Jews, three from the Caucasus, and three Latvians.

Solzhenitsyn describes how, in the state security organizations, Jewish membership increased during the 1920s. Three of the four of OGPU director Felix Dzerzhinsky’s assistants were Jews: Genrikh Yagoda, Benjamin Gerson, and M. M. Lutsky. Solzhenitsyn spends several pages describing the careers of people such as Lev Zalin, Leonid Bull, Simeon Schwartz, and the Nakhamkins clan (Hasidim from Gomel who “thirsted for revenge on everyone”). The Soviets staffed their diplomatic delegations largely with Jews — something the Western Europeans could not help but notice. Even among lower-level provincial authorities, Jews were disproportionately represented. As usual, Solzhenitsyn provides pages worth of names.

Of course, the Russian populace began to notice the brilliant success of so many Jews within the government of their barbaric new republic. They noticed the overall Jewish enthusiasm for the USSR. They noted how, as a group, Jews were the only nationality that seemed to enjoy a net benefit from the Revolution. Jews received the best land, the most privileges. They were less likely to be seen waiting in lines. Although there were efforts to suppress Judaism, Zionism, and Jewish culture (as there was with all religions and ethnic identities at the time), the Christians seemed to get the worst of it, with clergy being murdered or sent to gulags by the thousands, and their churches ransacked or destroyed. Solzhenitsyn describes how, in 1918, a Russian Orthodox procession came forth from the Kremlin in Tula in Central Russia and was simply gunned down.

This naturally caused a great deal of anti-Jewish feeling, especially in the countryside. When prominent Jews Leon Trotsky, Grigory Zinoviev, and Lev Kamanev formed their United Opposition against Stalin after Lenin’s death, most of their followers were Jewish. Trotsky fretted how Stalin might use the growing anti-Jewish feelings among the populace against his Jewish rivals. There may have been some truth to this, but Stalin was too politically astute to resort to crass anti-Semitism himself — especially given how numerous Jews were in the Party and how Western opinion and support of the Soviet Union depended much upon its treatment of Jews. As such, his most trusted Jewish allies, Lev Mekhlis, Moses Rukhimovitch, and Lazar Kaganovich never left his side during this time.

Solzhenitsyn also leaves us with this unsubtle nugget:

At the 12th Communist Party Congress (1923), three out of six Politburo members were Jewish. Three out of seven were Jews in the leadership of the Komsomol and in the Presidium of the All-Russia Conference in 1922. This was not tolerable to other leading communists and apparently preparations were begun for an anti-Jewish revolt at the 13th Party Congress (May 1924). There is evidence that a group of members of CK [Central Committee] was planning to drive leading Jews from the Politburo, replacing them with [Viktor] Nogin, [Aleksandr] Troyanovsky, and others, and that only the death of Nogin interrupted the plot. His death, literally on the eve of the Congress, resulted from an unsuccessful and unnecessary operation for a stomach ulcer by the same surgeon who dispatched [Mikhail] Frunze with an equally unneeded operation over a year and a half later.

It should be noted that in 1925 Mikhail Frunze was a rising star among the Soviets and was considered a possible successor to Lenin. Although he also suffered from a stomach ulcer, he said he was in fine health when Stalin pressured him into having this operation. Whether or not the physicians who performed this operation were Jewish remains an open question, but rumors persist among those who preserve Frunze’s memory that they were.

Towards the end of chapter eighteen Solzhenitsyn states unequivocally that Jews could be found throughout the Soviet power structure during the 1920s when that same power structure was stripping freedoms of speech, commerce, and religion from its citizens.

The 1930s, which Solzhenitsyn covers in chapter nineteen, was a different beast. This and the following chapter indeed are the bloodiest red pills found in Two Hundred Years Together. Terror famines, the Great Terror, and the worst abuses of the gulag system lay ahead. The “sinister principal executive” behind the mass collectivization which starved millions in Ukraine and other places, was Yakov Yakovlev-Epshtein. For many years this killer was lionized in the Soviet press. Solzhenitsyn lists three of his Jewish collaborators. He discusses Isai Davidovich Berg, the NKVD murderer who invented the mobile gas chamber. He implicates Jews such as M.G. Gerchikov (chairman of the Grain Trust board of directors), M. Kalmanovich, and I. Kleiner for their important roles in Soviet agriculture during the worst months of the Holodomor. Jews also comprised a third to a half of the People’s Commissariats of Trade and Supply during this time. Despite offering the caveat that Jews never populated one hundred percent of these powerful organizations, Solzhenitsyn goes on for pages detailing the Jewish dominance of Soviet economics, diplomacy, culture, and politics during the 1930s. He lists dozens of Jews by name who were victims of Stalin’s purges and describes the list as a “commemoration roster of many top-placed Jews.”

Here is a typical passage from chapter nineteen:

Out of 25 members in the Presidium of the Central Control Commission after the 16th Party Congress (1930), 10 were Jews: A. Solts, “the conscience of the Party” (in the bloodiest years from 1934 to 1938 was assistant to Vyshinsky, the General Prosecutor of the USSR); Z. Belenky (one of the three above-mentioned Belenky brothers); A. Goltsman (who supported Trotsky in the debate on trade unions); ferocious Rozaliya Zemlyachka (Zalkind); M. Kaganovich, another of the brothers; the Chekist Trilisser; the “militant atheist” Yaroslavsky; B. Roizenman; and A.P. Rozengolts, the surviving assistant of Trotsky. If one compares the composition of the party’s Central Committee in the 1920s with that in the early 1930s, he would find that it was almost unchanged — both in 1925 as well as after the 16th Party Congress, Jews comprised around 1/6 of the membership.

In the upper echelons of the communist party after the 17th Congress (“the congress of the victors”) in 1934, Jews remained at 1/6 of the membership of the Central Committee; in the Party Control Commission — around 1/3, and a similar proportion in the Revision Commission of the Central Committee. (It was headed for quite a while by M. Vladimirsky. From 1934 Lazar Kaganovich took the reins of the Central Control Commission). Jews made up the same proportion (1/3) of the members of the Commission of the Soviet Control. For five years filled with upheaval (1934-1939) the deputy General Prosecutor of the USSR was Grigory Leplevsky.

And this was occurring when Stalin was supposedly purging Jews from the Party.

In chapter twenty, Solzhenitsyn returns to his focus on the gulag system. This, understandably, is a short chapter given the vast, three-volume Gulag Archipelago which preceded it. However, Solzhenitsyn focuses on the Jewish Question here in the way he did only tangentially in Gulag. For example, he states that Jews had it easier than non-Jews in the gulag, and that they tended to make up the upper strata in these places. They deliberately looked out for each other and used their influence at the expense of non-Jews. For example, they were known to recruit other Jews for privileged positions among medical staff, even if the recruits had no medical training. Solzhenitsyn, again, spends pages listing Jews by name who used their tribal affiliations to receive unfair advantages in the gulag system — some of whom even had the nerve to complain about it later. He also retells the story of Ane Bernstein, an ethnic Latvian who believed his fortunate name was his ticket to salvation while a zek. He claimed that in all his camps, Jews took him for one of their own and never failed to help him when he needed it.

Solzhenitsyn reserves particular contempt for Lev Inzhir and Naftaly Frenkel. The former was a stool pigeon and false informant who became the chief accountant of the gulag system. Inzhir used his Jewish connections in government shamelessly to improve his position in the camps while presiding over the suffering of untold Russians, Ukrainians, and others. The latter was a successful businessman residing in Constantinople who had escaped Russia before the Revolution. He was no communist. Yet, he returned to the Soviet Union anyway and, as chief manager of the labor force of Belomor Canal, was responsible for the deaths of hundreds of thousands. Both Inzhir and Frenkel were covered extensively in Gulag.

Solzhenitsyn also revisits one of the earliest accusations of anti-Semitism he had to face as an author. In The Gulag Archipelago, he had included photographs of five men — all Jews — who had received Order of Lenin medals for their leadership in the construction of the Belomor. These men were Yagoda (head of the NKVD), Matvei Berman (head of the Gulag system), Lazar Kogan (head of canal construction), Jacob Rapoport (deputy head of construction), and Frenkel. Their photographs had been prominently displayed in a book about the Belomor, which was published shortly after its completion in the early 1930s. For this, many Jews labeled Solzhenitsyn an anti-Semite because he had made it seem as if Jews were disproportionately responsible for the tremendous death toll which had accrued along the banks of the Belomor.

But they were.

Furthermore, Solzhenitsyn mordantly points out how convenient it was for his critics to profess outrage over these crimes only decades after they had been committed. At the time, however — while these atrocities were being committed — nearly all Jewish voices were silent. And most remain so till this day — except when they wish to heap more scorn upon Solzhenitsyn as an anti-Semite.

Again, Solzhenitsyn reveals his extensive research by naming names. By this point in Two Hundred Years Together, he doesn’t even have to call them Jews anymore. The reader just knows:

The head of 1st Department of Belomorstroi was one Wolf; the head of the Dmitrov section of Volgocanal was Bovshover. The finance division of Belomorstroi was headed by L. Berenzon, his deputies were A. Dorfman, the already mentioned Inzhir, Loevetsky, Kagner, Angert. And how many of the other humbler posts remain unmentioned? Is it really reasonable to suppose that Jews were digging soil with shovels and racing their hand-barrows and dying under those barrows from exhaustion and emaciation? Well, view it as you wish. A. P. Skripnikova and D. P. Vitkovsky, who were there, told me that Jews were overrepresented among Idiots [inmates who obtained less demanding positions] during construction of Belomor Canal, and they did not roll barrows and did not die under them.

And you could find highly-placed Jewish commanders not only at BelBaltlag. Construction of the Kotlas-Vorkuta railroad was headed by Moroz (his son married Svetlana Stalina); the special officer-in-charge of Gulag in the Far East was Grach. These are only a few of the names, which resurfaced accidentally. If a former inmate Thomas Sgovio, an American national, didn’t write to me, I wouldn’t be aware about the head of the Chai-Uryinsk Mining Administration on Kolyma between 1943-44 (at the depths of the Patriotic War): “Half-colonel Arm was a tall black-haired Jew with a terrible reputation . . .

The red pills just keep getting redder and redder, don’t they?

Thwarting Jewish Conquest

Much of the tremendous value of Solzhenitsyn’s Two Hundred Years Together rests in how it was written completely without rancor. Only a highly cynical or unreasonable person could call it anti-Semitic — that is, a work that professes animosity or anger towards Jews as a people. Solzhenitsyn does not do this. In fact, he approaches the subject matter with great sensitivity and, despite his critical nature, seems to hope that no one take it personally. Yes, the author introduces the personal touch in many places. After all, he did live through some of the history he describes and personally met or corresponded with people who had witnessed things he hadn’t. And yes, the mordant barbs are there, as are the sarcastic asides. But this is no different than in his memoirs.

Solzhenitsyn simply wishes to tell the truth about Jews as a racially distinct people living in his beloved homeland. That most of what he writes is negative is partially a function of a number of Jewish authors making even more inflammatory statements about Russians. Chapter twenty-five focuses on just that, and the vitriol spilling from Jewish pens is simply venomous. Here is an example from one Arkady Belinkov, who attempts to paint Russians with a particularly broad brush:

“a pathetic society of slaves, descendants of slaves and ancestors of slaves,” “the cattle trembling from fear and anger,” “rectum-pipers, shuddering at the thought of possible consequences,” “the Russian intelligentsia always been willing to help stifle freedom.”

Solzhenitsyn reveals that for every act of anti-Jewish discrimination or prejudice we hear about in our mainstream literature, there were official efforts of conciliation and cooperation as well. And for every Jew killed in a bloody pogrom, more Russians, Ukrainians, and others suffered and died as a result of Jewish oppression, malfeasance, or vindictiveness when taking into consideration the early Soviet period. This is the great unheard truth that Solzhenitsyn reveals in Two Hundred Years Together. And his great unheard demand? That Jews own up to their prodigious sins, just as they continually demand that Russians (and whites in general) own up to theirs.

One unintentionally hilarious state of affairs keeps repeating itself, however. It’s like a running joke, and represents the only time when Solzhenitsyn may indeed go a little too far in his characterization of Jews. Throughout the nineteenth century, Russian leaders had tried to assimilate Jews. Vexed by their clannishness and aloofness, as well as by their stubborn predisposition for usury, liquor-selling, and other forms of opportunistic merchandizing, Tsar after Tsar had encouraged their Jewish population to act like Russians and farm. Tremendous energy over many years was expended dragging reluctant Jews towards agriculture, but all for naught. Jews made terrible farmers. And no amount of social engineering was going to change that. Further, many Jews exercised whatever chicanery they could to get out of farming and to return to business as usual in cities or in their shtetls. They just didn’t like manual labor. In fact, Jews would often get angry with those outlier Jews who managed to succeed in farming because that only encouraged the Russians with this wretched business. I can imagine Solzhenitsyn chuckling to himself when he wrote how Jews preferred trades that were “minimal on physical labor” and had a “national aversion to being outdoors.” This is as close to Jew-shaming as Solzhenitsyn gets in Two Hundred Years Together. And because it’s funny, it should be easy to forgive. Furthermore, it’s hard to say who gets more egg on their face in the end: the silly Jews who can’t seem to learn how to use a plow or the silly Russians who can’t see the futility in trying to turn nimble-minded Semites into Central Asian peasants. It is a true comedy of errors.

Beyond its comprehensive and dispassionate assessment of the Jewish Question in Russia, Two Hundred Years Together eloquently prescribes ethnocentrism as, if not a cure, then at least a palliative to the evils caused by close Jew-gentile contact. Quite often Solzhenitsyn underscores the Jew’s prime loyalty to his own people, just as he himself displays loyalty to his people, the Russians. He doesn’t blame the Jews for this, and takes pains to name Jews who saw themselves as equally Russian and Jewish (or even Russian first, Jewish second!). But the fact remains that these were (and still are) a small minority among Jews.

This is a demonstrable fact. Even Jews notice it. Solzhenitsyn uses some of the more honest ones as sources for Two Hundred Years Together, such as Josef Biekerman, mentioned earlier. This makes this work impossible to dismiss. What follows are a few more examples of Solzhenitsyn’s Jewish sources. In chapter twenty-one, “During the Soviet-German War,” he writes:

. . . a Jew living in a particular country belongs not only to that country, and his loyalties become inevitably split in two. The Jews have “always harbored nationalist attitudes, but the object of their nationalism was Jewry, not the country in which they lived”. Their interest in this country is partial.

The quoted text above comes from Jewish author Solomon Lurie.

In chapter twenty-seven, “About the Assimilation,” he quotes Jewish philosopher Martin Buber:

So far, our existence had served only to shake the thrones of idols, but not to erect the throne of God. This is exactly why our existence among other nations is so mysterious. We purport to teach others about the absolute, but in reality we just say “no” to other nations, or, perhaps, we are actually nothing more than just the embodiment of such negation. This is why we have turned into the nightmare of the nations.

In the same chapter, he quotes author Arthur Koestler challenging Jews to either emigrate to Israel or renounce their Jewish identity:

. . . all previous attempts of assimilation were based on the wrong assumption that the Jews could be adequate sons of the host nation, while at the same time preserving their religion and remaining the Chosen People.

He then quotes an Israeli author A. B. Yoshua:

The Galut [diaspora] Jew is an immoral creature. He uses all the benefits of his host country but at the same time he does not fully identify with it. These people demand the status which no other nation in the world has — to be allowed to have two homelands: the one, where they currently live, and another one, where “their heart lives.” And after that they still wonder why they are hated!

Language cannot get any plainer than that, can it?

Yet, Solzhenitsyn points out that these Jews receive nothing but ridicule or contempt from their fellow Jews. This is a constant refrain throughout Two Hundred Years Together. We know about the abuse that Biekerman had to face. In chapter twenty-four, “Breaking Away from Bolshevism,” Solzhenitsyn details the life of Mikhail Kheifetz, a Jew who suffered through the camps as had Solzhenitsyn and then endeavored to apologize on behalf of his people for all the evil they had committed in the Soviet Union. “He was bitterly ridiculed,” Solzhenitsyn writes.

Felix Svetov was another. This was a Jew who converted to Christianity and called for Jewish repentance in an autobiographical novel entitled Open the Doors for Me. He was branded a self-hating anti-Semite by other Jews. Of course, these same Jews, oblivious to the double standard, would turn around and welcome this kind of repentance from non-Jews. But if a Jew does it, it’s anti-Semitism.

In the later chapters, Solzhenitsyn revisits many of his major themes, and pontificates on the Jewish question in more general terms (“Can we say that the Jews always struggled for freedom?”). While certainly interesting and thought-provoking, this is where one of the author’s messages begins to fray. This message is one of meaning or divine purpose. God put Jews and Russians together for a reason — perhaps to test or temper both parties, but who can truly understand God? Perhaps through honesty and reconciliation, we will all become better people? On the last pages of Two Hundred Years Together, he writes:

The purpose of this book, reflected even in its title, is this: we should understand each other, we should recognize each other’s standpoint and feelings. With this book, I want to extend a handshake of understanding — for all our future.

But we must do so mutually!

A fine sentiment — but is it based in reality? Not to play Bert to Solzhenitsyn’s Ernie, but if the Jews truly wished to recognize the “standpoint and feelings” of white gentiles, wouldn’t they have done so by now? Two hundred years is a long time to leave the light on. And it hasn’t gotten any better since Two Hundred Years Together was published. The Jewish response to the book was largely negative, and Solzhenitsyn’s posthumous reputation as an anti-Semite in some circles is now beginning to rival his reputation as a dissident author. For example, Jewish writer Cathy Young in her 2004 Reason article not only dismissed the work as anti-Semitic, but questioned whether or not Solzhenitsyn himself was an anti-Semite, something he always vigorously denied. She repeated this sentiment sixteen years later in her Quillette article “Solzhenitsyn: the Fall of a Prophet.” To be fair, longtime Solzhenitsyn antagonist Richard Pipes had a more measured but still critical response. Much of these responses (and others, including this one by Yochanan Petrovsky-Stern) challenge Solzhenitsyn’s scholarship in one way or another. This mostly entails not just pouncing on factual errors, but impugning Solzhenitsyn’s exoneration of the Tsarist treatment of Jews prior to the Revolutions of 1917, downplaying the significance of the Jewish role in the October Revolution and early Soviet government, and questioning his selection of sources (Jewish or not) that largely bolster his worldview at the expense of others. From this, they predictably conclude that the great man has slipped from scholarly objectivity to personal anti-Jewish bias.

The work is close to a thousand pages long, and Solzhenitsyn was writing in his late seventies. It would be shocking if there were no errors in it at all. What is distressing, however, is that these Jewish critics said little about the vast suffering of Russians during the Soviet period or cared to refute Solzhenitsyn’s linking of high-level Jews such as Leon Trotsky, Grigory Zinoviev, Lazar Kaganovich, Genrikh Yagoda, Lev Inzhir, Naftaly Frenkel, and others to this suffering in their responses. They would rather defend the honor of Jews against a man who has a lot of nice things to say about them despite all his criticism. Finally, these critics don’t seem to appreciate that Two Hundred Years Together offers the Russian response to shelves upon shelves of anti-Russian literature spilled from the pens of Jews. Russians are entitled to their perspectives — as are white people in general — and they have the right to express them, even if they violate norms established and policed by Jews. There is nothing in the above criticisms of Two Hundred Years Together that seems to respect this perspective, even for a man with the impeccable integrity of Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn.

Does any of this offer hope that Solzhenitsyn’s “handshake of understanding” will somehow not be rebuffed by the Jewish people? Is there anything in Two Hundred Years Together that justifies this kind of hope? Here is Solzhenitsyn, quite literally offering eternal friendship to the Jews on behalf of the Russian people, and here is Cathy Young, in effect, telling him to pound sand. We all know that righteous Jews like Josef Biekerman would never do that — and bless his eternal soul for that — but few people beyond Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn even care about what Josef Biekerman thought. The Jews certainly don’t, at least not in a positive way, and they’ve had almost a century now to change their minds about people like him.

So while we wait, we’re left suspending our disbelief regarding the Jewish Question, and it’s getting heavier every year. As whites slowly lose hold of their majorities within their homelands, Solzhenitsyn’s calls for hope and reconciliation are becoming more and more shrill. As a devout Christian, hoping against the odds may have retained some meaning for him. But for those of us living in a post-Christian age (or for those Christians dismayed by how the Church has embraced the degeneracy of cultural Marxism) the question emerges: How much longer can we afford to hope?

Furthermore, in the absence of hope, what is there?

If there is anything else in Two Hundred Years Together besides the misdeeds of Jews, it’s ethnocentrism. It’s real, it’s natural, it’s inevitable, and it pulses through almost every page, not only in the brazenly clannish behavior of the Jews, but also in Solzhenitsyn’s narration. Being an ethnonationalist himself, he has a nose for the racial aspects of the history he’s compiling. Many of the details he unearths are unusual and in the vast majority of cases strengthens his thesis of the racial or ethnic underpinnings of Jewish and Russian strife. He also speaks directly to the reader on behalf of ethnocentrism, especially towards the end.

In chapter fourteen, “During 1917,” he writes:

. . . in July the All-Russian Conference on the Jewish Congress preparation took place in Petrograd. Because of social enthusiasm, [Maxim] Vinaver was able to declare there that the idea of united Jewish nation, dispersed among different countries, is ripe, and that from now on the Russian Jews may not be indifferent to the situation of Jews in other countries, such as Romania or Poland. The Congress date was set for December.

What an upsurge of Jewish national energy it was!

This national energy played out a few years later during the Soviet-Polish War when many Polish Jews welcomed the Red Army and were accused of harboring pro-Soviet or anti-Polish attitudes. Some were charged with spying for the Soviets. But national energy isn’t the purview of Jews alone. Ukrainians also had a nationalist agenda, which was undervalued by Jews and Russians alike. It should then come as no surprise that some of the bloodiest fighting during the Civil War, and certainly the bloodiest pogroms, occurred in Ukraine.

In the same chapter, Solzhenitsyn notes how a lack of ethnocentrism makes a people weak. He writes how a foolish “loss of sense of national self-preservation” on the part of the Russian leaders of the Provisional Government doomed them. They spent millions of rubles promoting the interests of ethnic minorities in Russia, but ignored the needs of Russians. Solzhenitsyn states how P. N. Milyukov, a Russian minister of the Provisional Government, never expressed pro-Russian sentiments while in power. Alexander Kerensky also repudiated his Russian identity and expressed great bias against Russian conservatives.

In chapter eighteen, “In the 1920s,” Solzhenitsyn discusses the nationalist reactions to Jewish hegemony. In 1926, Y. V. Klyutchnikov, a publicist and former Cadet, gave a speech in which he explains anti-Jewish hooliganism as an expression of the “hurt national feelings of Russians” and pointed to the imbalance created by the disproportionate presence of Jews in cities and in government:

We have a housing crisis in Moscow — masses of people are crowding into areas not fit for habitation and at the same time people see others pouring in from other parts of the country taking up housing. These arrivals are Jews. A national dissatisfaction is rising and a defensiveness and fear of other nationalities. We must not close our eyes to that. A Russian speaking to a Russian will say things that he will not say to a Jew. Many are saying that there are too many Jews in Moscow. This must be dealt with, but don’t call it anti-Semitism.

In chapter nineteen, “In the 1930s,” he writes how Jews fretted about the rebirth of Russian patriotism (discredited as “Great Russian chauvinism”), even on the eve of World War II. Solzhenitsyn finds an Israeli magazine from 1988 which, in an example of classic Jewish solipsism, condemns the resurgence of Russian patriotism in the late 1930s despite how Russian patriotism had saved Soviet Jewry from the Germans. Solzhenitsyn then quite reasonably asks his Jewish readers if any Russian patriotism can be permitted at all. Chapter twenty, “In the Camps of Gulag,” begins with zek Solzhenitsyn being disabused of his humanist pretentions while interned as a guest of the state. Prisoners self-segregated by nationality (as they do in all prisons), and some nationalities were treated better than others. Being a Russian, Solzhenitsyn, of course, fell into the latter group.

As Two Hundred Years Together winds down, we find Solzhenitsyn concluding that the loss of nationalism would be “an impoverishment of humanity, the entropy of the spirit.” In chapter twenty-six, “The Beginning of Exodus,” he states that Jewish Israeli nationalism is natural, necessary, and should be encouraged. By quoting an Israeli author in chapter twenty-one, “During the Soviet-German War,” he also gives air to the suppressed opinion that it was the lack of Jewish nationalism that led to the Jewish Holocaust. In the end, he prescribes nationalism as the cure for the “curse of exile.” Having been an exile himself for nearly two decades, Solzhenitsyn has a clear understanding of what it’s like to be apart from one’s home.

The difficulty, of course, is that most of the Jewish diaspora prefers to be rootless. They prefer exile and alienation in gentile lands to returning to a somewhat harsher life in Israel. This makes life easier for them, yes. But as Jewish political influence outside of Israel increases, white gentiles suffer more, and the more this extranational Jewish presence resembles conquest. If modern white dissidents can take anything from Two Hundred Years Together, it’s that white identity is the only antidote to Jewish conquest. In the final chapters, Solzhenitsyn outlines how the resurgence of even a relatively mild Russian identity in the Soviet Union was enough to send large amounts of Jews packing to Israel and the West. In many cases, a mere lack of professional advancement did the trick.

If it could be done there, it can be done anywhere.

Two Hundred Years Together is an invaluable source for all Right-wing dissidents. It provides ammunition to prevent Jewish conquest, which is the animating force behind the totalitarian Left. Two Hundred Years Together is history that must be internalized and weaponized. Afterwards, once the Jewish Left has been thwarted, with the majority of Jews either assimilating into the gentile population once and for all or returning to Israel, only then can we seek the honesty and reconciliation that Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn so fervently asked for.

Only then can we reflect on how it all had meaning.

(Republished from Counter-Currents Publishing by permission of author or representative)
 
Hide 246 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. Anonymous[151] • Disclaimer says:

    Two Hundred Years Together is an invaluable source for all Right-wing dissidents. It provides ammunition to prevent Jewish conquest, which is the animating force behind the totalitarian Left. Two Hundred Years Together is history that must be internalized and weaponized.

    Yeah, but if there’s no English translation it kind of makes it hard for us Anglophones.

  2. Bookish1 says:

    get ready america your next on the list of victims.

    • Agree: Robert Dolan, Thim
    • Replies: @HeebHunter
  3. nickels says:

    I’ll have to come back to this article, great subject.
    I tried to read some of this book in Russian, but, reading Solzh in Russian is kind of like taking your face to a cheese grater.

  4. tomgreg says:
    @Anonymous

    An English version is available at a r c h i v e dot o r g

    • Replies: @wiggles
  5. ‘…Two Hundred Years Together is an invaluable source for all Right-wing dissidents…’

    Perhaps that explains why it has yet to be properly translated.

  6. Mephisto says:

    You had your chance with Hitler.
    You failed. Now you will 1000 years of Jewish domination.
    White elites will be nearly all Jewish soon enough. Just look at Trump and Clinton’s grandkids and know reality.
    Aceept reality and stop whining. I am tired of it.

  7. The saga of the non-translation of Two Hundred Years Together over eighteen years is interesting in a couple of respects.

    First, it suggests how Jewish power works. I doubt a Fuhrerbefehl has ever issued from OberKommando der Judentum; rather, it’s more of a matter of Jews being plentiful throughout academia and the publishing industry, and most of those Jews preferring that this book not be translated — without ever even articulating the thought. Just as my wife can never quite get me to fix that slight leak under the sink, so a translation of Two Hundred Years together never quite comes to pass. ‘Isn’t it antisemitic,’ and ‘couldn’t we issue ______ instead?’

    Like fixing the sink, it never quite happens. It’s not that I won’t; it’s just that I keep finding other things I’d rather do.

    Second, at the back of many minds must be the thought that the longer this is deferred, the less likely a translation becomes. Solzhenitsyn in the Seventies and Eighties was a towering figure; and he was still quite important in 2005. Now, with every passing year, he slips into the past; one of the important writers of the Twentieth Century, but perhaps of great interest only to students of Russian literature. If one volume of Bulgakov remains untranslated, how many really fret?

    Just keep pushing Two Hundred Years Together to the back of the queue, and it’ll eventually go away; for many, that must be the thought. And indeed, so much that it says would be so awkward to discuss; what could be more attractive than the prospect that maybe it’ll eventually just go away?

  8. Mark Hunter says: • Website

    This is a cultural war … and since when is it considered honorable to tell the truth to your enemy during war?

    — a major fallacy in the author’s argument. We are not trying to convince our enemies of anything.

    Remember the first rule of debating:  Your goal is to convince the audience, not your opponent.

    • Replies: @JWalters
  9. CCG says:
    @Anonymous

    Contact the publisher (Vagrius) along with all other interested people as a large group petition for an English translation. They’ll accept because this one book will make them an enormous profit in the Anglosphere.

    • Replies: @republic
  10. … the reason why the Jews were so irate … was because of the anti-Jewish pogrom in Kishinev in modern-day Moldova, a few months prior. But modern dissidents should not concern themselves with this. … Because Jews rarely consider the reasons behind any anti-Jewish actions taken by gentiles, pogroms or otherwise. For them, such behavior simply springs from irrational gentile minds. This is how Jews weaponize history. Well, thanks to Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, two can play at that game.

    Why play it? The truth is bad enough. The pogrom in Moldova involved totally different people and did not excuse the behavior in Gomel, Belarus.

  11. Wally says:

    “and, sadly, many wealthy and influential Jews remain on the vanguard of this invasion. Even more sadly, the majority of diaspora Jews, if their voting patterns tell us anything, actually support this invasion.”

    And that’s why there’s an Israel.

    Jews support strict Israeli immigration laws which specify JEWS ONLY, while demanding massive 3rd world immigration into the US & Europe.

    • Thanks: Ace
  12. The Asian diaspora is following a similar trajectory.

  13. Polistra says:

    Jews as tax cheats, draft dodgers, grievance mongers, and shockingly incompetent agriculturalists
    ……….

    Some things never change!

    It’s a rigged game, this public opinion. Jews make ostentatious victims, but as victimizers, they lurk in the shadows like assassins. This is the two-faced beast all Rightists must face

    Some things never..

    Without pogroms at the very least, the Whites would have been able to raise more money and make more use of Jewish talent and manpower than what they had at their disposal at the time. They also would have made Bolshevism a lot less attractive to centrist or otherwise neutral Jews. And, who knows? This might have made the difference in the war’s outcome.

    However, as this very article showed earlier on, the so-called pogroms were resistance to jewish oppression of the Russian peasantry.

    Recommended reading: The Jewish Rape of Russia
    https://nationalvanguard.org/2017/07/the-jewish-rape-of-russia/

  14. GMC says:

    How do we know Solzhenitsyn wasn’t fabricating all this ? Because he put everyone into the movie – good guys – bad guys – neutral guys and a cast of thousands, plus, he named names, places, dates, documents, POlice reports, Newsy reports, and it all looks like Pravda to me. I’m sooo pleased that President Putin used the phrase, lately – ” Let’s have a debate – Joe ” because that is exactly what the people of the world need. Our history books and the bought off professors, writers, historians, publishers have kept the truth from lower and higher educational institutions. And they doubled up on the lies, from the 1960s – on , as the majority of the boomer population were headed to college.
    Vietnam opened the eyes of Americans for awhile, but even that was slowly put to sleep. They are still asleep – and the media and the Neocons have won – for now. Let’s have a debate ! are Magic words.

  15. Dumbo says:

    Two Hundred Years Together

    Would it were only 200… It’s like 3,000 and counting… LOL. Just kidding! 😀 😉

    I wish they would publish the book.

    • Replies: @Robjil
  16. goyjoy says:

    Jews are so some of the most self entilted peoples of the world, after African Americans.

    • Replies: @Dumbo
  17. Dumbo says: • Website
    @Colin Wright

    Yeah, no censorship is needed. Jews basically dominate the publishing industry, as well as Hollywood etc, so basically these industries cater to their tastes or interests.

    They are just not interested in publishing “200 years together” or similar books. Unfortunately, neither are most white people.

    However, is Bezos crypto-Jewish? No one in recent years has had as much power over what books are sold, and yet he seems to be in the side of censorship and the official narrative. Many books and authors were removed from his platform (just as they were from Google, Youtube, etc) for not toeing the line.

    P.S. Maybe you should fix that sink? 😉 Of course, then your wife would find something else for you to repair, but that’s life.

    • Replies: @gotmituns
    , @Colin Wright
  18. @Mephisto

    Most of them already accepted it! They will run with the lies until their communities and countries are no more. Which is soon to be quite honest.

    They cant wait to join grandpa in hell.

  19. Dumbo says:
    @goyjoy

    Maybe gypsies are the first? Despite being the lowest of the low everywhere, they still call non-gypsies “gajos” and shun them, and refuse to assimilate or change their own ways.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  20. @Bookish1

    They are the criminals. It is their turn to reap what they sowed.

  21. Schuetze says:

    “He also, perhaps most importantly for him, exonerates much of Tsarist Russia from the charge of anti-Semitism which never seems to stop oozing from Jewish pens.”

    In light of the genocide that happened after the October Revolution, any anti-Semitism would have been entirely justified. If Jews can look back in history and claim that what happened to them in the past justifies their actions and attitudes today, then Europeans are certainly justified in doing the same.

    This is an interesting article about Anton Deniken, “a Russian Lieutenant General in the Imperial Russian Army (1916), later served as the Deputy Supreme Ruler of Russia during the Russian Civil War of 1917–1922. He was also a military leader of South Russia (as commander in chief).”

    I really enjoyed this comment by John Ernest Hodgson, a British war correspondent with Denikin’s forces, said the following of Denikin’s and his officers’ antisemitism:

    “I had not been with Denikin more than a month before I was forced to the conclusion that the Jew represented a very big element in the Russian upheaval. The officers and men of the Army laid practically all the blame for their country’s troubles on the Hebrew. They held that the whole cataclysm had been engineered by some great and mysterious secret society of international Jews, who, in the pay and at the orders of Germany, had seized the psychological moment and snatched the reins of government. All the figures and facts that were then available appeared to lend colour to this contention. No less than 82 per cent of the Bolshevik Commissars were known to be Jews, the fierce and implacable ‘Trotsky,’ who shared office with Lenin, being a Yiddisher whose real name was Bronstein. Among Denikin’s officers this idea was an obsession of such terrible bitterness and insistency as to lead them into making statements of the wildest and most fantastic character. Many of them had persuaded themselves that Freemasonry was, in alliance with the Jews, part and parcel of the Bolshevik machine, and that what they had called the diabolical schemes for Russia’s downfall had been hatched in the Petrograd and Moscow Masonic lodges. When I told them that I and most of my best friends were Freemasons, and that England owed a great deal to its loyal Jews, they stared at me askance and sadly shook their heads in fear for England’s credulity in trusting the chosen race. One even asked me quietly whether I personally was a Jew. When America showed herself decidedly against any kind of interference in Russia, the idea soon gained wide credence that President Woodrow Wilson was a Jew, while Mr. Lloyd George was referred to as a Jew whenever a cable from England appeared to show him as being lukewarm in support of the anti-Bolsheviks.”

    • Agree: Johnny Walker Read
    • Disagree: Mikhail
  22. Schuetze says:

    “3. Any Rightist movement in conflict with the Left should do as little as possible to alienate centrist or neutral Jews. Again, this does not mean the Right should seek these people out or curry favor with them. Unabashed philo-Semitism is simply a bad look for any leader of the Right. It seems that a professed Judeo-neutral position might be the best course. It makes the radical Left less attractive, it makes Leftist propaganda harder to fabricate, and it will allow for the Right to utilize a certain amount of Jewish capital, talent, and manpower.”

    What a crock of bullshit. The biggest problem facing “Nationalists” at this point in time is talmudic lies in general, and the holohoax cult in specific. Through this pack of stinking lies, jews murdered hundreds, even thousands, of brave Europeans, locked up untold thousands more, and has robbed generations of every other race on the planet of free speech. The fact that they have had to criminalize any dissent, research or contradictory opinion on their disgusting fable is all that we need to know about this pack of lies.

    Any jew who is a holohoax believer is as good as an anti-German and anti-European extremist and certainly cannot be considered a “centrist or neutral jew”. Period. Jewish Power needs to be bent back on the perpetrators of two world wars and the theft of Palestine. Belief in the holohoax, expressed through written text, speech, or visual media needs to be criminalized and perpetrators locked up. Their leadership needs to be subject to trials for crimes against humanity, and they need to be tortured by crushed testicles to extract confessions before they are allowed to testify. Once this purge of talmudic lies has been accomplished, then we can start talking about the “centrist or neutral jew”.

    • Agree: Rocha, HdC
    • Replies: @Chris Moore
  23. ebear says:
    @Colin Wright

    I think Solzhenitsyn was writing for a Russian audience. If he’d wanted 200YT published in English, he could have had that done in Russia – no need to involve western publishers.

  24. gotmituns says:
    @Polistra

    jewish oppression of the Russian peasantry
    —————————————————
    The jews oppress the ordinary people wherever they are. That’s why walled ghettos came into existence in the first place. The jews needed protection from the peasantry for good reason.

    • Replies: @Schuetze
  25. gotmituns says:
    @Dumbo

    They are just not interested in publishing “200 years together” or similar books.
    ——————————————————————————————
    There’s another point as well. I don’t think many people would read it anyway even if it were published. People just don’t read anymore for the most part.

    • Agree: Mike Fridelle
    • Replies: @Dumbo
  26. Robjil says:
    @Dumbo

    The reason for 200 years, was that there few Jews in Russia before 1795. What happened in 1795? The Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth was taken over and divided up by Russia, Prussia, and Austria-Hungary. Russia got the biggest share. This Commonwealth was the world center of Ashkenazi Jewry. Polish Kings since the 11th century had invited Jews in to do as they pleased in their realm. They grew into millions by 1795 in this Polish Kingdom.

    Thus, Russia set the up the Pale of Settlement to keep the Jews within the old borders of the Polish Kingdom. It was quite large area, about the size of Alaska, most of Ukraine, Belarus, the Baltics, Moldavia, and Poland. Why did Russia do this? The Jews within the Pale, abused their power over the peasants and the non-Jewish merchants. It was not an anti- Jewish action, it was to protect the rest of Russia from this abusive behavior.

    In the book, the Russian empire tried many things to stop the abusive behaviors of the Jewish merchants. It put laws in to end the Jewish monopoly on liquor. It tried to get Jews to farm the land. That did not work at all. They left or sold the stuff to non-Jews.

    After the 1917 pro-Jewish revolution, Solzhenitsyn talks about the large scale immigration of Pale of Settlement Jews to all areas of the Soviet Union. Moscow and St. Petersburg were a magnet for this migration. Thus, there was less Jews in the Pale after 1917.

    The main reason that this book was not published, it shows Jewish culture in Eastern Europe as it was. They were not a bunch of saints praying all day who were tormented by “gentiles”. They were people who had their faults like everyone else in the world.

    • Thanks: Ace
    • Replies: @Marcali
  27. @Mephisto

    You had your chance with Hitler.

    Obviously, ‘Hitler’ was a placement of the dominant political structure. Tasked with destruction. And the reconstruction of a narrative to be repeated by twits in perpetuity. After Trump, even the twits ought to be able to see that. But it appears they can’t help themselves.
    As to the question of whether a bunch of corrupt, power hungry obsessional neurotics feel the compulsion to latch themselves to the identity of ‘jewishness’, why care? Doesn’t seem very ‘elite’ to me.

    • Replies: @gotmituns
  28. @Mephisto

    If we all become Jewish, then what makes anyone chosen? As a future chosen, where’s my Messiah and homeland promised by Yahweh? I mean it was promised thousands of years ago. Seems Yahweh is a bit of a con man. So I think I will pass on your proposition. You can have Trump with Ivana (isn’t she a non Chabad Jew?) grandkids.

    Finally all parasites kill or poison their host. The poisoning is well underway, and you will be ruling mere rubble without the much promised Messiah. Just look at how thoroughly out classed Biden’s Jewish cabinet is? Dumb down people, get dumb down results while making the Jew overlord look…well….dumb. So a sincere good luck with the promised land of dust. Who will be whining in the end? Who has a wailing wall?

  29. How was Lenin able to condemn sionism if the jews had such a dominance over te bolsheviks? Lenin was verry much an opponent to the sionism in the Bund and wanted to see the jews assimilated and Stalin shared the same view.

  30. Thim says:

    Solshenitsyn was down with the JQ. He concluded by insisting that all Jews leave Russia. But he “was not an anti-Semite.”

    Sure thing Spencer.

    • Replies: @gotmituns
  31. republic says:
    @CCG

    No bookstore in the US would dare stock it, Amazon would not have it available.

    • Agree: gotmituns
    • Replies: @CCG
    , @Morton's toes
  32. anon[304] • Disclaimer says:

    Spencer Quinn notes that“the Church has embraced the degeneracy of cultural Marxism.” Yet cultural Marxism was the original goal of the Jewish authors of the Jew Testament, as explained by Ludwig von Mises:

    “….primitive Christianity is Bolshevism.”

    Socialism: An Economic and Sociological Analysis
    Chapter 29: Christianity and Socialism, p. 413
    https://www.econlib.org/library/Mises/msS.html?chapter_num=35#book-reader

  33. JKnecht says:

    Been waiting for translation since publication.

  34. Jake says:
    @Anonymous

    If the Anglosphere were not the Anglo-Zionist Empire, then Two Hundred Years Together would be in print in English. So by all means let’s have more WASP culture taking over more of the world so we can make the Anglo-Zionist Empire larger, because that somehow will free us from Jewish bankers and radicals, and then we’ll have an English translation of Two Hundred Years Together.

    Along those lines, think about this quote: “Dissidents on the Right should therefore piggyback on Solzhenitsyn’s fame and use his name as often as possible when combating the Left on the battlefield of ideas — especially when it comes to the Jewish Question.”

    Dissidents on the Right who are atheists/agnostics/Deists or pagans or ‘conservative’ Anglophone Protestants and who piggyback on Solzhenitsyn will be participating in dishonesty.

    It is either Christ and Christendom or Chaos that Jews per capita will dominate.

    • Agree: Rocha
    • Replies: @anon
    , @Alden
  35. gotmituns says:
    @Thim

    “was not an anti-Semite.”
    ————————————–
    “Where there is no anti-Semitism, there are no Jews.” Theodor Herzl

    • LOL: Schuetze
  36. gotmituns says:
    @Symbol of Virtue

    The Nazis were destroyed because they figured out how to bring back the German economy, do away with the middle man/jews and bankers/jews by going to an all barter economy. If the jews hadn’t started WW2 when they did, their game was up.

    • Agree: Johnny Smoggins
    • Replies: @soll
  37. Anonymous[250] • Disclaimer says:
    @Dumbo

    Food for thought.

    Despite coming originally from India, there are no gypsies in East Asia (China, Mongolia, Japan, South Korea) and very, very few in South East Asia (where, with its plethora of ethnicities, you might think they could blend in much more).

    Even in Central Asia (Kazakhstan etc), there are vanishingly few gypsies (in the low thousands, maybe)

    But why should Gypsy movement and settlement be only towards the west, not towards the east or north?

    Isn’t this strange? Why is this?

    • Replies: @Ace
  38. CCG says:
    @republic

    Interested buyers could always purchase it directly from the publisher, like the books of various authors (e.g. E. Michael Jones, Ryan T Anderson, etc.) that have been cancelled by Amazon. The publisher could also make it an e-book (after all, this book is over 1000 pages long). Again, to be purchased directly from the publisher.

    • Replies: @republic
  39. anon[427] • Disclaimer says:

    Vox Day’s Castalia House should publish this book in english.

    if anyone is able to contact him, please do

    • Replies: @CCG
  40. @republic

    We should send a petition to some boutique publisher like Mr. Ron Unz.

    I have that ad hoc samizdat e-translation but a professional and reliable version that I could put on my bookshelf next to my other ferocious titles would be eclectic!

  41. Schuetze says:
    @gotmituns

    The walled ghettos, curfews and yellow arm bands were to prevent the jews from going out at night and kidnapping children to use in their blood sacrifice rituals.

  42. Exosome says:

    Dissidents on the Right should therefore piggyback on Solzhenitsyn’s fame and use his name as often as possible when combating the Left on the battlefield of ideas — especially when it comes to the Jewish Question. And this is where Two Hundred Years Together comes in.

    Dissidents should not play the silly left/right game.
    Dissident is dissident, be it in science or history or on political issues usually caused by the former two mentioned. What is “right wing” in US political circus, may not be seen as such elsewhere.
    I would translate “right wing” as not marxist lunatics (left) who lack any reason.

    Best example, germ theory, the orthodoxy do not allow dissidents at all, same tactics deployed. You will not hear anything different, the theory is treated as a fact. The orthodoxy is this case consists of what is called left. The believing sheeples mindlessly repeat ad nauseam the theories they haven brainwashed and scared with, and fail to ask any critical questions.

  43. Marcali says:
    @Robjil

    There was no Austria-Hungary in 1795. Only from 1870 there existed the Dual Monarchy.

    • Replies: @Robjil
  44. Stephen M says:

    No, there is a translation here: https://b-ok.global/book/2956212/550800

    Two Hundred Years Together is a two-volume historical essay by Nobel Price winning author Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn dealing with the Russian-Jewish relations from 1795, leading up to the Communist revolution (Vol. 1) and then through the Communist era to 1995 (Vol. 2). The original Russian volumes were first published in 2001 and 2002 respectively. French (Fayard, 2002) and German (HERBIG, 2003) translations were published soon after, but until now only a partial English translation of this remarkable work was available in The Solzhenitsyn Reader: New and Essential Writings (Lanham, 2006).

    The importance of a complete English translation has been discussed online ever since the books were first published, and in October 2010 the first chapters were posted online on a wordpress site called Adam’s Blog, however the owner of that site received a warning by the copyright-holders in August 2011 and the translation process stopped in its tracks.

    It wasn’t until January 2017 that voices showing the public interest in a full English translation became loud enough that pseudonymous people took it upon themselves to finish what had been started nearly a decade earlier.

    and

    This translation has been a combined effort by several people.

    Chapters 4 and 5 from Volume 1, as well as Chapters 13, 14 and 16-27 were translated pseudonymously by multiple people and posted online in 2010 at https://200yearstogether.wordpress.com/. Some of these chapters did not have English footnotes.
    Chapters 2, 3 and 6 through 12, as well as Chapter 15 have been translated between February and March of the year 2017. They were made available pseudonymously by David and Davina Davison at https://twohundredyearstogether.wordpress.com. These chapters were translated from French.

    Chapter 1 is of unknown origin, it was posted on 8chan in pdf format. Some footnotes from the French edition have been edited in. The translation for this chapter is not complete and a better version will likely be made and included in future editions of this work.

    Other translations of some of these chapters can be found online. There exists an alternative partial translation of chapters 2, 3 and 6 from the original Russian. I decided to use the one made by the Davisons because the writing was of superior quality and no difference in the content was found.

    If you find any errors in this publication, look for my contact details at The Incorrect Library.

    Shadilay, March 2017

    • Replies: @Stephen M
  45. anon[304] • Disclaimer says:
    @Jake

    Christ is Kang! — of um… “Zion.” Geography pro-tip: Zion is the capital city of that shitty little country far off in the middle-east, nowhere near your own blood and soil. Jews cause chaos? Indeed, but you’re willing to swallow the Jewish-authored chaos of the New Testament that proclaims Jewish-supremicist passages such as, “Salvation is from the Jews,” “Goyim owe it to the Jews,” and “The Jew First.” Even your Catholic Catechism says, “To the Jews belong….the worship!”

    You must repent of your greed, Jake. The Rabbi you worship has openly bribed you with a “hundredfold” payoff to “forsake” your own hearth and kin, so that you may obtain a fantastical afterlife in a “heavenly Zion.” Humble yourself;* realize that eternal life is as biologically unreal as a transvestite choosing his own gender, and take your mitt out of the monkey trap that promises the covetous with a gaudy condo. Do you really think the Rabbi you worship will deliver on his eternal “mansion” real estate scam in a magically-hovering Zion, a Jewish-authored narrative that defies all biological reality?** Get your ass out of the clouds, and your feet back on the Earth, if you want things to go a little better on the surface of this planet. Oh, and stand on your feet, and get off your knees to the Jew Kang.
    _________
    * Kesebir, P. (2014) A quiet ego quiets death anxiety: Humility as an existential anxiety buffer. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Vol 106(4), pp. 610-623.

    ** The 4 stories we tell ourselves about death, by Stephen Cave

  46. @Colin Wright

    How then you explain it has been translated into German, Italian and French, as well into numerous “smaller” languages like Serbian?

  47. Robjil says:
    @Marcali

    I know.

    I mentioned it since it was the last empire in control of that area of the Polish Kingdom before 1914.

    It would be a long explanation to say all name changes for that area since 1795.

    Galicia was the region that the Austrian empire controlled.

  48. @Polistra

    Thanks. Found this excerpt to be most interesting:

    Although Stalin, who was a Georgian, was surrounded by Jews almost to the extent Lenin had been, he managed to play the Jews off against each other. He outmaneuvered Zinoviev, Kamenev, Trotsky, and all the rest and eventually came out on top. It undoubtedly was to his advantage during this power struggle that the Russian people detested the Jews, from centuries of bitter experience with them.

    Before Stalin became the undisputed boss of the Kremlin, the Jews had pretty well monopolized the entire Soviet bureaucracy, and even though Stalin began thinning them out a bit in the late 1930s, the Second World War came along before he had time to do much. And before he got around to continuing his program of de-Judaizing the Soviet bureaucracy after the war, he died — with a little help from his right-hand Jew, Lazar Kaganovich, who later bragged that he had saved the Jews by poisoning Stalin. So the Soviet bureaucracy remained heavily loaded with Jews right up until the collapse of communism — although they tried not to be too conspicuous — usually occupying the second-rank positions, where they wouldn’t be so visible.

  49. In my opinion, Solzhenitsyn’s book is a monument to misunderstanding. It is essentially a work on Christian historiosophy posing as popular historiography.

    Solzhenitsyn’s chief weakness lies in seeing Jews as a monolithic community. Were he more nuanced, he would have noted that many Russian Jews are actually Russians of (partly) Jewish ancestry & not Jews anymore. Another group would consist of Jewish “Soviets”, a quasi-ideological group with no real national loyalties, except for a Bolshevik-style internationalism. The most important group would be real Jews, individuals possessing authentic Jewish culture & identity. And Solzhenitsyn was trekking through vast Russian Jewish encyclopedia, picking interesting, but frequently bizarre & insignificant anecdotes or percentages.

    In my opinion, Solzhenitsyn did not possess analytical mind; he wrote as a Christian essentialist who, although writing primarily on history, somehow forgot: individuals, peoples…change. Russians, Ukrainians, Letts, Jews in 1920 had been rather different groups from those in 1960. He is myopic on many themes: for instance, he’d like that Jews & Russians confess their respective sins, repent & achieve catharsis, even atonement with God. But- most of them are not believers, so what kind of advice is that ?

    I would repeat: Jews had been, especially earlier, but even until the end of USSR, more “foreign” than they were in central Europe- here is a quote that illustrates incisively what I mean: “And here is another very thoughtful testimonial (1975): “The efforts spent over the last hundred years by Jewish intellectuals to reincarnate themselves into the Russian national form were truly titanic. Yet it did not give them balance of mind; on the contrary, it rather made them to feel the bitterness of their bi-national existence more acutely.”

    And “they have an answer to the tragic question of Aleksandr Blok: `My Russia, my life, are we to drudge through life together?´ To that question, to which a Russian as a rule gives an unambiguous answer, a member of Russian-Jewish intelligentsia used to reply (sometimes after self-reflection): `No, not together. For the time being, yes, side by side, but not together´… A duty is no substitute for Motherland.

    So, basically, Solzhenitsyn bemoans the fact that Soviet Jews are a separate people & not Russians. I find it absurd because: a) assimilated, fully assimilated “Jews” are Russians; 2) acculturated, not assimilated, Jews are not Russians, but a separate people. And? What’s new? What did he expect?

    Just a few accents on Soviet Jews from Solzhenitsyn:

    Perhaps the strongest animus towards them comes from their over-representation in the 2nd & 3rd echelons, so to speak, in the NKVD repression apparatus (mostly interrogators, not executors) & political police. That was the level of county or city (the highest politics & the 2nd layer were mostly covered by Gentiles). Many deracinated young Jews had fanatically identified with Millennarian Bolshevism & had been overzealous sectarians of a new merciless Utopia. Without religious constraints, seething with revenge against Czar, “rootless”, Russophone, urban, socially mobile – they were reliable props for the new totalitarian society,

    Their disillusionment with USSR came during Khrushchev era (the Doctors’ plot that darkened Stalin’s last year was glossed over) & national euphoria in the 1967 Israel’s 6 days war. Their intermarriage rate was ca. 50% and there were 2.3 million of them during the 1960s. It seems that apocalyptic fervor had sizzled & the drab realities of Soviet life, combined with a pro-Arab Soviet policy & American meddling produced first, mostly reluctant refuseniks. Then, during the 1970s, their national re-awakening surprised everyone (including themselves) & Brezhnev was letting ~ 30,000 of them annually to move out. Funny, until Yom Kippur war in 1973, more than 95% of them went into Israel; after the war, enthusiasm was, eh, “curbed”- 5-10% to Israel, most of the rest to the Europe or the US. After the collapse of the USSR they, “pure” and mixed both, avalanched into Israel, and now there are less than 400,000 of them in Russia.

    As a coda, I would say: this is a book packed with too many details, but it gains its massive impact by the very voluminousness; there is always a sense that these people, Jews, are essential aliens who, most of them, would like to assimilate, but always one or another incident pops up that keeps Jewish identity alive (propaganda, Holocaust, Israel, Soviet foreign policy,..). One gets the impression they were fascinated more by the apocalyptic promise than by the real, historical country- something very different from Germany and Austria where, were it not for Hitler, they’d be swallowed by assimilation in Hoch Deutsche Kultur. But, since Russians are also a Messianist people- you can’t have two competing Messiahs for the same cause. And during the 1960s, it became evident that Communist Kingdom of Heaven was not in sight.

  50. Chris Moore says: • Website
    @Schuetze

    Any jew who is a holohoax believer is as good as an anti-German and anti-European extremist and certainly cannot be considered a “centrist or neutral jew”. Period. Jewish Power needs to be bent back on the perpetrators of two world wars and the theft of Palestine. Belief in the holohoax, expressed through written text, speech, or visual media needs to be criminalized and perpetrators locked up. Their leadership needs to be subject to trials for crimes against humanity,and they need to be tortured by crushed testicles to extract confessions before they are allowed to testify. Once this purge of talmudic lies has been accomplished, then we can start talking about the “centrist or neutral jew”.

    Agree with all but the bold. Torture to gain confession is what Jewry/anti-Christ/”Christian” Zionism is all about.

    Torture is what the ((neocons)) advocate. It feeds sadism and bloodlust, and reduces the perps to savages/barely human wild animals.

    You have to remember, the end of human civilization is their goal. They’re the anti-Moses and anti-Christ all wrapped into one. You wouldn’t torture a pack of jackals and so shouldn’t torture Zionists. But you should definitely shoot them when they encroach on human civilization.

    • Agree: Arthur MacBride
    • Replies: @Schuetze
  51. Miro23 says:

    In the same chapter, Solzhenitsyn notes how a lack of ethnocentrism makes a people weak. He writes how a foolish “loss of sense of national self-preservation” on the part of the Russian leaders of the Provisional Government doomed them.

    He’s probably right there. If the Provisional Government had stated at the outset that Russia was the historic national home of the ethnic Russian and Ukrainian people, and as such they held an inalienable right to be the political class (with related media ownership/control) – that would have greatly helped solve the problem of the Bolsheviks.

    Jewish radicals would then have had the option of being arrested for political activity, or going back to the comfortable life of the rich commercial bourgeoisie – and minding their own business (or emigrating).

  52. Dumbo says:
    @gotmituns

    Yeah. I guess Solzhenitsyn today would have to become a Youtuber.

    And I’m not even joking. The level of intellectual discourse now in the West is so low, that many times the media talks about “Youtubers” and “Twitterers” and their opinions and impact on culture and politics.

    • Replies: @Bardon Kaldian
  53. J says:

    200 years of suffering is enough! The moment there was a possibility to leave Russia, Jews left in mass. Today Jews are less than 0.1% of the population and leaving. Is Russia more prosperous, are Russians happier? I do not know, but former Russian Jews surely are.

    • Replies: @TheIdiot
  54. Anonymous[967] • Disclaimer says:

    The Jews are not innocent victims. They are in fact a very active and enterprising people who place themselves in very dangerous situations. They make enemies as well as friends. Any suffering they have endured goes with the territory they place themselves.

  55. CCG says:
    @anon

    His email address is shown on the web version of his blog:

    voxday-at-protonmail-dot-com

  56. @Bardon Kaldian

    In those countries Jewish power is not as “total” as in the US.
    They have also far smaller Jewish populations.

    • Replies: @Bardon Kaldian
  57. soll says:
    @gotmituns

    The Jews caused Hitler to seek out Stalin in 1939 (whom he had ignored throughout the 30s) to now invade Poland, uh?

    Did “the Jews” cause Hitler to keep breaking his peace treaties also? They also caused Hitler to break his 1938 Munich Pact, made him break his 1934 Non-Aggression Pact with Poland, and I guess cause Hitler to also break his 1939 Non-Aggression Pact with the USSR? Hitler has no autonomy over his own actions, it’s all those name-less Jews?

    Hitler never changed the economy, the Reichsbank remained the same as before he was appointed. Only difference was some dummy corporations used to help finance rearmament while Hitler looted and sold off Germany’s pre-1933’s gold reserves. (valued at almost 900 million, 4 years later by 1937 gold reserves were less than 80 million).

    In 1934, Hitler blocked the Reich budgets from publication so that none of the German population were aware of the states fiscal policies (he did this to hide his armament spending). At the same time he also made himself tax-exempt (having been fined 400,000 marks by the German tax office on his then 1,2 million annual income). The rest continues with removing people from employment statists such as women and the Jews, while sending layabouts to the various labour camps.

    The economy of the Third Reich in modern comparisons as shown by Adam Tooze (author of The Wages of Destruction) was as living today in Latin America and just above South Africa for living standards and personal income. Germany being behind both Great Britain and the United States at the time all throughout the 1930s.

    • Disagree: Colin Wright
    • Replies: @gotmituns
    , @Bardon Kaldian
  58. @Schuetze

    I can’t speak to the author’s knowledge regarding the Tsarist regime prior to and during WWI.

    However, as student of military history with one of my major areas of interest being that of WWI, I have read quite widely on the subject.

    Currently, I am reading Alexander Watson’s excellently written study on WWI from the German perspective, “Ring of Steel”.

    In it he describes the Russian Army as very antisemitic, demonstrating for example, how the Jews in eastern, Polish Galicia of the Hapsburg Empire were treated horrendously, with around 1200 or so being deported to Russia for trial during the Russian occupation of Galicia.

    Part of this antisemitism may have come as a result of the expansionist ambitions the Russians had for this area of Hapsburg lands. Watson does not say why such dislike for Jews in the army was so prevalent, though it may have been linked to the indoctrination that Russian army officers and men were subject to prior to the invasion of Galicia whereby, Ruthenes, Jews, Germans, and other minorities who were not seen as true Slavs were to be not trusted and treated as suspicious persons of interest.

    On another note, Watson does describe that the wealthy Jews in the region all fled, including rabbis, before the Russians reached their lands, leaving their lessor coreligionists high and dry to fend for themselves. So much for group solidarity…

    • Replies: @Schuetze
  59. @Franklin Ryckaert

    It’s not “total” in the UK or Australia, either. Or, if you wish, in India.

    So why they don’t translate this book?

    Well, because it is …. boring?

    Good luck in reading. You’ll need it.

    • Replies: @Colin Wright
  60. gotmituns says:
    @soll

    Shut it down Schmuel – the Goyim know.

    • Agree: Rocha
  61. Alden says:
    @Jake

    It would not cost much to buy the Russian language book and find a Russian immigrant with excellent English to translate. Then a native English speaker who learned correct grammar syntax and vocabulary back in the olden day’s, ( like me) could clean up the translation.

    So we’d print it out at home. Buy a new more heavy duty office type printer first. Then what?

    There are those self publishing companies that print, bind and ship books from manuscripts. They’re not expensive. But would it be possible to find such a company in America or any English speaking nation? Probably not.

    Might be such companies in anti Israel Arab nations. They crank out millions of Korans in different languages every year The type setters probably wouldn’t have to know English.
    Distribution would be a problem. ADL AJC would kill the distributors and burn the books. And track down the buyers.

    It could be done for less than a million USD.

    Something to think about.

    The real reason the Ashkenazi swarmed out of E Europe after 1870 is because for the first time in more than a thousand years they were subject to the draft. Selling garbage to the military fine. Actually enlisting never never ever. That’s an old German saying.

    • Replies: @Ilya G Poimandres
  62. Schuetze says:
    @Chris Moore

    Please allow me to rephrase that. Every Holohoax confirming jew deserves to have their gonads crushed in order to extract confessions, exactly in the same manner they have based their 3000 years of tyranny of goyim upon. If they dare to call us Amalek, and we know from their books of lies exactly what that portends, then we have every right to treat them as Amalek too. We may be better than them, and we may grant them clemency, but they have absolutely no reason to expect anything other than our equivalent vengeance. Especially as long as they continue pushing their talmudic mind control agenda based around their holohoax lies.

    • Agree: Mike Fridelle
    • Replies: @Chris Moore
  63. @soll

    Hitler, basically, lost because he went to war against the whole world.

    But, to paint his economic policy as something 2nd or 3rd rate is ridiculous. His Germany was the pioneer in many areas of technology & in many areas light years ahead of US, UK & other countries.

    Simply, his extremist ideology & politics resulted in an unwinnable war.

    • Replies: @Schuetze
  64. Schuetze says:
    @Steve Naidamast

    “he describes the Russian Army as very antisemitic

    Part of this antisemitism may have come as a result of the expansionist ambitions the Russians”

    Puleease stop it with that bullshit “antisemitism”. Just read a little into the Talmud and the Protocols of Zion. To Jews all Chrisitans are cattle. The jews assassinated Tsar Alexander II. They assassinated Lincoln, McKinley and Garfield. The Jews in the US deserved to be driven from the country and spat uponfor all history long ago merely for their assassination of the Kennedy’s. Lets not even get into what they deserve for the Liberty, 9/11 or especially dragging the US into WWI and WWII for Israel.

    Jews are a race of swine. Why else would they have been expelled from 190 countries? Why else would they treat Palestinians the way they do?

  65. Alden says:
    @Bardon Kaldian

    Does anyone know if Jewish oppression of Poles was lessened after the take over of Poland by Austria Russia Prussia. It should have been.
    At the very least to make the Poles accept the change of rulers. I always read that the Poles were unhappy with the change in governments.

    Back in medieval times, the Polish rulers of a vast territory from the Baltic to the Black Sea didn’t do much to stop the Tartar Chechen slave raiders who sent Millions of Polish subjects to the Turkish Persian and other Muslim slavery markets through the slave market Crimean ports like Odessa. The Russian rulers did try to stop the slave raiders by conquering the slave raiding countries and tribes.

  66. Schuetze says:
    @Bardon Kaldian

    Hitler, basically, lost because he went to war against the whole world.

    Nope. Hitler lost because he went against Judea. Judea declared war on Germany in 1933. Already in 1933 Judea ran the entire world. Hitler created an alternative reality, and the jews had to destroy it. Hitler as Amalek, and the jew world united together to destroy him, his country, his people, and anyone who dared to associate with them. The UN, WHO, and all the other globalist organizations are merely manifestations of Jewish control of the entire planet. Already in 1815 the Rothschilds wanted to form a league of nations under judaic control. Only Russia stopped them, and that is why Alexander II and Tsar Nicholas were assassinated by jews.

    “his extremist ideology & politics resulted in an unwinnable war.”

    Nope. Hitler lost the war against the jew narrative. Today, the jew narrative is running rampant across the entire planet. No one dares resist, not Putin, not Xi, not even the president of Tanzania.

    Today the Jew Narrative = Science. To deny “science” is to deny the jew narrative and is equivalent to being “cancelled”, or even worse assassination. Just look at what happened to the president of Tanzania.

    • LOL: soll
  67. Chris Moore says: • Website
    @Schuetze

    they have absolutely no reason to expect anything other than our equivalent vengeance.

    That’s a good point. Because they ostensibly aren’t jackals without human agency, they have free will to choose their own fate. If they kill the flock to gorge when they have plenty, they should expect the equivalent to pay at least 1 for 1, and really something more than that as punishment for the mindless animal aggression.

    This is the mistake that Christians have always made in dealing with them — they’ve assumed if they had plenty, why would they want more? But their doctrinaire, entitled, royalist “chosen bloodline” conceit makes them arrogant, and then when they get caught, they appeal to Christians as the “persecuted just like Jesus. That’s why we did it!” Or they appeal to Christianity’s imperatives for compassion and forgiveness.

    Christians really can’t afford to be stupid anymore in dealing with sociopaths. Nor afford tolerance for the sociopath’s corrupt, like-minded stooges wearing sheep’s clothing.

    I’ve always said, those in bed with Zionist wolves from left to right have shown their true animal face.

    • Agree: Schuetze
    • Replies: @anon
  68. @Dumbo

    Incomparable Evalion ….


    • Replies: @cohen
  69. @Alden

    .. I’m up for the translation part anyways! Did Nagarjuna’s Mulamadhyakakarika into Russian for my God-daughter, though she needs to ripen beyond the single digits before trying to crack that chestnut 😀 Maybe I’ll just take on the challenge for fun, and send it to Mr Unz.. getting very bored under house arrest.

  70. Exosome says:
    @Schuetze

    Today the Jew Narrative = Science. To deny “science” is to deny the jew narrative and is equivalent to being “cancelled”, or even worse assassination. Just look at what happened to the president of Tanzania.

    Absolutely true.

    This “science”, in case of “covid” specifically, is not biology, but technology and biology quackery, like synthetic genes, able to connect you to a cloud AI. In my view, DNA is a transceiver interacting with an information field, some call it god. It doesn’t store data as postulated.

    “Deniers” ie heretics doubting the given dogma of the day are criminalized in such system.

    The “Soviet man” is characterised by his tendency to follow the authority of the state in its assessment of reality, to adopt an attitude of mistrust and anxiety towards anything foreign and unknown, and is convinced of his own powerlessness and inability to affect the surrounding reality; from here, it is only a step towards lacking any sense of responsibility for that reality. His suppressed aggression, birthed by his chronic dissatisfaction with life, his intense sense of injustice and his inability to achieve self-realisation, and his great envy, all erupt into a fascination with force and violence, as well as a tendency towards “negative identification” – in opposition to “the enemy” or “the foreigner”. Such a personality suits a quasi-tribal approach to standards of morality and law (the things “our people” have a right to do are condemned in the “foreigner”).
    — ”Conflict-dependent Russia. The domestic determinants of the Kremlin’s anti-western policy”, Maria Domańska

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homo_Sovieticus

    • Thanks: Schuetze
    • Replies: @Mulga Mumblebrain
  71. Richard B says:
    @Anonymous

    Two Hundred Years Together is an invaluable source for all Right-wing dissidents

    That a writer of Solzhenitsyn’s towering stature took on a project which directly refutes the myth of perpetual Jewish victimhood and reverses the blame typically reserved for white gentiles should be nothing less than a triumph for the Right.

    This isn’t about the Right! It never was and never will be.

    It’s about Whites. It’s about European Culture and its geographical extensions, such as the USA, etc. But it’s not about the Right. The Right just makes it about itself because the Right’s self-absorption knows no bounds. So, not surprisingly, it conflates Right with White.

    Placing Race in general, and White Interests in particular, under the iron paw of an intellectually and morally bankrupt 18th century Enlightenment ideology that has long since outlived its usefulness, and has a lot to answer for, and then lecturing others about Truth is simply so perverse and twisted as to be self-refuting.

    A better example of an unconscious violation of one’s own logic would be impossible to imagine.

    The Right, or whatever they’re calling themselves these days, needs to get over itself and stop putting the cart before the horse. This is about Race and Culture, not Ideology and Politics. But if you insist on clinging to ideology at least learn something about explanatory behavior. I have yet to meet a single ideologue of the Right or Left who could tell me a thing about it.

    Staying stuck in a has been ideology that’s been getting its ass handed to it since The French Revolution is as great a betrayal of European culture and the White race that one could imagine.

    • Replies: @Mulga Mumblebrain
  72. vinteuil says:

    So what would it cost to get the whole thing well translated into English by a really first rate translator? $1000? $10,000? $100,000?

  73. 9593 says:

    “200 Years Together” in 2 volumes is available in Russian, German, and French. I have the French; can’t read it with two years of high school French from 60 years ago, but a good thing to capture, symbolically.

    https://www.solzhenitsyncenter.org/his-writings/large-works-and-novels/two-hundred-years-together

    Columbus Falco wrote an English translation under the title “The Crucifixion of Russia”. Amazon carried it for a little while, but of course, the copyright problem. If one were lucky enough to capture the Kindle version while it lingered on Amazon, it may have been removed from the Kindle by remote control by now.

    Internet Archive has it in a translation that was done by more than one translator. The index has chapters crossed out for not being finished by the first translator, but the chapters appear as having been made available by the second translator. 435 pages. Google search won’t find it for you. I would avoid handing out the link from one of the more forthcoming search engines to keep us out of copyright trouble.

    A more interesting source is the work of the late Professor John Doyle Klier. Available on Amazon still, at very high prices: “Russians, Jews and the Pogroms of 1881 – 1882” – – “Pogroms: Anti-Jewish Violence Russn (Anti-Jewish Violence in Modern Russian History) ” – – “Russia Gathers Her Jews: The Origins of the “Jewish Question” in Russia, 1772–1825″ – – “Pogroms: Anti-Jewish Violence in Modern Russian History”

    Klier describes the gross exaggerations of Gentile pogrom barbarity that appeared in the Jewish newspapers of London and New York City – and the attempt of the British government to expose the truth through the efforts of the British Legates in various Russian cities. It happened that there was no retribution taken against Professor Klier for such revelations. He was highly regarded in the field of Russian history. – and his books were likely of low circulation. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Klier

  74. BorisMay says:

    This article misses the point because it is too long, too convoluted and too intellectual.

    People are persuaded by fundamentals: poverty caused by government mismanagement that causes starvation is one of the most effective causes to rally a people.

    Speaking the truth to power only gives the oppressed a feeling of justice, but it never leads to freedom. You can see this everywhere in the white countries run by Jews.

    Where truth changes matters to the oppressed advantage then the oppressors change the rules quite arbitrarily. You can witness this every day in the UK in 2021 where judicial reviews of government diktats by the oppressed are on the point of being outlawed by Alexander de Phiffel Johnson (incorrectly referred to as Prime Minister Boris Johnson) who is a Jew born in New York who seems to be taking his orders from that close personal friend of Epstein (the paedophile), Bill Gates.

    When the food runs out, as it surely will, is when the real revolution begins. Between now and then is when the identified protestors will be eliminated. They have already started with the President of Tanzania, and will soon move on those using social media before they castrate people like Unz and various other websites.

    The real revolutionaries have already positioned themselves below the radar using ancient technology such as manual typewriters, Roneo reprographics and personal acquaintances for distribution. Groups will meet in secret and be informed by hand delivered hand written letters of actions and activities planned.

    • Replies: @TheIdiot
  75. Alright, here are some good & great books about Jewish question normal people could read, if interested. Many good stuff; also, some exaggerations & omissions, but a worthy & readable material.

  76. TheIdiot says:
    @Bardon Kaldian

    In short, Solzhenitsyn’s work, whilst graded by your paymasters as an absolute height of antisemitism, it is too little to late to do any justice for the executed Christians of Russian Empire

    Here is an example of “oppression of Jews” in the Russian Empire:

    “Rosalia Samoilovna Zemlyachka, née Zalkind (Russian: Розалия Самойловна Землячка, рожд. Залкинд) (20 March 1876 – 21 January 1947) was a Russian revolutionary and Soviet politician.[1]

    Born in a wealthy family of JEWISH merchants of the 1st Guild, she got an excellent education in Kiev and later at the Faculty of Medicine of the University of Lyon. From age of 17 was involved in revolutionary activities and never worked in any paid job until the October Revolution. She is best known for her involvement in the organization of the First Russian revolution, and along with Béla Kun, as one of the organizers of the Red Terror in the Crimea in 1920–1921, against former soldiers of the White Army. It was in Crimea that the White Russians led by General Pyotr Nikolayevich Wrangel fell to the Red Army in 1920. About 50,000 to 160,000 prisoners of war and anti-Bolshevik civilians who had surrendered after they had been promised amnesty, were subsequently executed, on orders from Kun and Zemlyachka, with Vladimir Lenin’s approval.[2][3][4] ”

    Solzhenitsyn privately admitted that he left out of his work the most horrendous crimes of genocide committed by Jews against Christians of Russia so as to not further upset the modern relationship of two nation

    Another weakness of Solzhenitsyn was that he was unfamiliar with and significantly underestimated the strength odiousness and brutal relentlessness of the internal organisation of the Jewish nation, at least in Eastern Europe/Russian Empire. His picture of that nation is external and less if at all internal: manifestations of genocide against Christians rather than study of the fundamental causes of the Jewish internal policies against host nations, unknown to him…

    Another good omission is the Holodomor, or Jewish-led genocide of the Christians of Malorussia:
    The Butcher of Ukraine – Jew Kagan ovich


    Lazar Kaganovich –
    Stalin’s Mass Murderer

    American Times Today

    7-10-1

    Further information on the Stalin-Kakanovich Ukraine Holocaust

    http://www.infoukes.com/history/famine/

    Lazar Moiseyevich Kaganovich (Kogan), of Jewish descent, was born in Kubany, near Kiev, Ukraine, in 1893. In 1911 he joined the Jewish-founded Communist Party and became involved with the Bolsheviks (Lower East Side New York Jews). Kaganovich took an active part in the 1917 takeover of Christian Russia by Communism and rose rapidly in the Party hierarchy. From 1925 to 1928, he was first secretary of the party organization in Ukraine and by 1930 was a full member of the Politburo. Kaganovich was one of a small group of Stalin’s top sadists pushing for very high rates of collectivization after 1929. He became Stalin’s butcher of Christian Russians during the late 1920s and early 1930s when the Kremlin launched its war against the kulaks (small landowners who were Christians) and implemented a ruthless policy of land collectivization. The resulting state-organized forced famine, was a planned genocide and killed 7,000,000 Ukrainians between 1932 and 1933, and inflicted enormous suffering on the Soviet Central Asian republic of Kazakhstan.

    • Thanks: Robjil, Dieter Kief
    • Replies: @Bardon Kaldian
  77. TheIdiot says:
    @J

    Suffering indeed

    • Replies: @Franklin Ryckaert
  78. TheIdiot says:
    @Bardon Kaldian

    German translation printed just once in 2002

    Sold out

    Never reprinted again

    (even Mein Kampf) has been reprinted 8 times since the recurrent sell outs of the 2015 scientific edition

    Indeed 200 years together is considered even more dangerous than the Mein Kampf

  79. @Anonymous

    Well, never a bad time to practice Russian or use Google Translate.

  80. @Dumbo

    ‘P.S. Maybe you should fix that sink? 😉 Of course, then your wife would find something else for you to repair, but that’s life.’

    Exactly. Husband strategy.

    The sink is at worst a mildly unpleasant afternoon. So I leave it there until she summons up the energy to make an issue out of it. Then, finally — round about May 2022 — she ‘wins.’ After all, it should be done. I don’t disagree.

    Meantime, though, I’ve never had to do anything about refinishing the stairs.

  81. @ebear

    ‘I think Solzhenitsyn was writing for a Russian audience. If he’d wanted 200YT published in English, he could have had that done in Russia – no need to involve western publishers.’

    Perhaps — but that’s not why we’re not getting to see it.

  82. @Bardon Kaldian

    ‘Well, because it is …. boring?

    Good luck in reading. You’ll need it.’

    Theory (a). Solzhenitsyn’s other works are riveting. That’s why they’ve been translated. Two Hundred Years Together is boring. That’s why it has’t been translated.

    Theory (b). Jews wield excessive power and influence in English-speaking countries. That’s why the one book Solzhenitsyn wrote that is directly critical of Jews hasn’t been translated.

    For Bardon, (a) must be the correct explanation.

    Speaking for myself, I think that if a writer of Solzhenitsyn’s stature wrote a book on a controversial subject, it would be dead certain to get translated into English at least. That is, unless some people were concerned to prevent it from being translated into English.

    • Disagree: Mulga Mumblebrain
    • Replies: @Bardon Kaldian
    , @Wielgus
  83. @Schuetze

    Already in 1815 the Rothschilds wanted to form a league of nations under judaic control. Only Russia stopped them, and that is why Alexander II and Tsar Nicholas were assassinated by jews.

    True.
    Recently watching a vdo of many thousands paying tribute to Tsar Nicholas II/family at the “Church on the Blood”, erected over the actual site of their murder in the Ipatiev House (which was demolished by the jew Andropov in 1977 b/c so many were gathering there) … seeing some of these pilgrims carrying a black/yellow/white tricolor flag and made inquiry ref its significance … it seems a revival of the old Monarchist Black Hundreds, popular groups which arose to counter the 1905 revolution …

    The movement was founded in October 1905, by two minor government officials Alexander Dubrovin (see below) and Vladimir Purishkevich, who participated in the killing of Grigori Rasputin in 1916. The URP’s aim was to rally the Russian people behind nationalism and the Tsar. By 1906 it had over 300,000 members. Its paramilitary armed bands, called the Black Hundreds, fought revolutionaries violently in the streets. Its leaders organised a series of political assassinations of deputies and other representatives of parties which supported the Russian Revolution of 1905.

    https://tsarnicholas.org/category/black-hundreds/

    The largest of the Black Hundreds was called “The Union of the Russian People”, reconstituted in 2005 following appeals by sculptor Vyacheslav Klykov; after attempts to divert it from Orthodox Monarchism it is today in existence; website (Rus only)

    https://srn.rusidea.org/

    Just for information and to wish URP patriots “God Speed”.

    • Thanks: Schuetze
  84. @TheIdiot

    This is a good example why one cannot seriously analyze Jewish condition & influence in Russia. Because: people are stupid, uninformed, biased & generally- dumb as a sack of hammers.

    No serious man thinks that Solzhenitsyn’s last polemical book is anti-judaist. It simply is not a history; it covers too much ground; it is more similar to literary philosophy than to history proper; it is dated on many issues; …..

    Solzhenitsyn is right about the central issue: Jews are a separate people, and most of them did not assimilate, but just acculturate to the Russian cultural sphere. He never asserted there was some grand Jewish plan against Christians, or Russia, or anything similar. For conspiracy-minded lunatics, one should go elsewhere.

    He had covered too much ground; essentially, there could be written numerous books on the subject, belonging to ethno-psychology, economy, political philosophy, history proper, sociology, military history, ….

    This presentation, although rather good in my opinion, also lacks perspective on many intriguing questions.

    For instance:

    * why did Russian Jews so massively join SR, Socialist Revolutionaries (Gershuni, Goltz)? These were terrorists who extolled Russian peasants, ideological heirs to Lavrov and Narodnaya Volya, i.e. Russian terrorist anarchists who aimed at liberation of peasants & who idolized peasantry. So, why did urban, essentially ethnically alien Jews, identify themselves so much with Ukrainian/Russian peasantry? To me, this is enigmatic. Perhaps some confusion about re their identity?

    * there is no proof, nor evidence that most Russian press was in, say, 1900-1914, “Jewish” or pro-Jewish. This is complete nonsense.

    * what can be said about Jewish identity from 1945 to 1990? In which measure did Russophone people of Jewish ancestry retain their individuality? How many people who emigrated from the 70s on were actually Jews? Or was it, in too many cases, basically economic emigration of men & women with full or partial Jewish ancestry scrambling to escape Soviet & post-Soviet poverty, using a “Jewish card” as an excuse?

    * on the other hand- how come so many Jews living in big cities, and without religion or cultural distinctiveness, succeeded to retain their national individuality? Did Soviet policy of pressuring them, during the Brezhnev era, help – otherwise, more of them would simply disappear among more numerous Russians?

    * what is the relevance of Jewish museums in Russia? They depict a life no modern Jew living in Russia can identify with.

    There are too many intriguing questions, but they cannot be crammed in a book.

    • Agree: New Dealer
  85. Judaism itself must be the ‘oldest hatred’. After all it was always a xenophobic cult, with different moral systems for interacting with fellow Jews and the goyim and practising strict separation from others. It was almost certainly devoted to killing and expelling its ‘enemies’ as the Torah makes plain, and as the history of the Palestinians shows is still extant. Live alone, denigrate non-Jews as lesser beings, practise rigorous endogamy, kill ‘down to the last suckling babe’ those whose land you covet-hardly love and peace. That some of your victims come to hate you is inevitable-the ‘Second Oldest Hatred’.
    As for ‘antisemitism’ being somehow innate-that’s rubbish. Even in Nazi Germany most Germans were disgusted by Kristallnacht. Many risked their lives to save Jews, as did many Poles, another people vilified by the ‘antisemitism’ industry, prior to the shakedown. Throughout long periods of history, Jew-hatred was rare, and only grew slowly as elite Jews practised usury and other actions not exactly designed to induce empathic fellow feeling. And even now, when acts of real Judeophobia have fallen to very low levels, the ‘antisemitism’ industry invents new ones, most grossly seen in the tsunami of vomited lies leveled at Corbyn a life-long friend of Jews, and UK Labour.

    • Agree: Colin Wright
  86. @Colin Wright

    I have read this book and can vouchsafe it contains nothing against Jews as a people. A more serious indictment of Jewishness can be found in works by Laqueur and Lindemann. They are the real deal & analyze traits of the “Jewish character” that may cause antipathy among surrounding peoples.

    More than half of the book is boring; then, even more interesting parts are too tedious for average American reader. Even more, Solzhenitsyn explicitly refutes myths such as:

    * Jewish Bolshevism. No, their presence during revolutions was not decisive; true, they participated disproportionately, as was the case with other national minorities (Poles, Letts, Georgians,…)

    * their supposed guilt for mass starvation during collectivization. No, that was Stalin’s decision and the entire party, any ethnicity, avidly participated in this.

    * their guilt for anti-Christian persecution. No, address true leaders, Lenin and Stalin.

    * their role in red terror. No, they were as guilty as anyone in this “enterprise”. Address Lenin, Stalin and Dzerzhinsky.

    Solzhenitsyn had succeeded to cast doubt on two issues: the scope of pogroms in czarist Russia & the idea that Stalin wanted to orchestrate a massive pogrom after the Doctor’s plot. That’s all. There is not anything truly new in Solzhenitsyn’s book.

    • Agree: New Dealer
    • Replies: @Colin Wright
  87. @Richard B

    The truth seems to be that Jews are perpetual, if exaggerated, victims, and perpetual, but completely suppressed, victimisers. Believing that you are God, and the ‘race’ is all, and regarding others as lesser beings, between the Jews and animals, will do that to you. Mind you, most Jews just live relatively quiet and modest lives, and mix freely with the lesser beings, but the supremacist loons and the bloodsucking usurers get the whole into disrepute.

    • Agree: Richard B
  88. @Exosome

    The Soviet was attacked by the West immediately in military interventions, then by Germany, acting for the capitalist West, in 1941, suffering the greatest damage in history, then was actively targeted by the USA et al for nuclear destruction, until it achieved deterrence, then was actively subverted and threatened, surrounded by US bases, until Gorbachev surrendered, then it was broken up by the bibulous Quisling Yeltsin and looted, but it was The Kremlin that had an ‘anti-Western policy’??!! This Domanska MUST be on the CIA or MI6 payroll.

  89. Solzhenitsyn is a giant and his work is one huge redpill.

    I remember the sheer horror I had while reading “The Gulag Archipeligo.”

    Every page revealed stupid brutality……and brutal stupidity.

    A knock at the door late at night…..they take father away…..never to be seen again.

    Nobody could read Gulag and not understand just how evil communism really is…..
    and that very same feeling of dread is in the air RIGHT NOW.

    Solzhenitsyn said something to the effect that if people had had any idea how bad it would get, they would have done more to stop it. I look around at what’s happening today and have the very same feeling of astonishment that we are allowing the same crew of murderous Bolsheviks to wreck not only America but the entire western world.

    And it’s hard to see how the ship can be corrected unless jewish influence is mitigated. And if the jews close ranks as more and more people wake up….what can be done about it?

    Organized jewish groups do nothing but spew hatred on whites…..and those same groups spread fear to their ingroup. Fear and jewish paranoia….that results in MORE police state controls and MORE demonization of whites….and it just keeps ramping up.

    The absurdity of the FBI going after the 1/6 protesters is just a little taste of Bolshevism. I suspect the covid lockdowns are tied in as well. “You’ll own nothing and be happy” sums it up quite nicely…..they plan to take it ALL and leave us with NOTHING.

    This is no time for walking on eggshells and sweating about whether the truth might “offend those nice jews.”

    We are facing the extinction of our race. The DELIBERATE ethnic cleansing of our people.

    And there is no confusion about who is doing it.

  90. @Bardon Kaldian

    Though the books you mention are indeed useful, I have a different list of revealing works on the Jewish Question. Following titles can all be read free on line:

    1) David Duke, Jewish Supremacism.

    Google: pdfdrive.com/jewish-supremacism

    Still the best introduction to the subject.

    2) All works by Kevin MacDonald, but especially The Culture of Critique

    Google: [PDF]The Culture of Critique.

    About Jewish subversive cultural and political movements in the West.

    3) Douglas Reed, The Controversy of Zion

    Google: The Controversy of Zion-Research Gate

    About Jewish subversive behavior from about 500 BC to the establishment of Israel.

    4) When Victims Rule (by an anonymous Jew)

    Exists only on line. Google: when victims rule – JR Books Online.com

    A complete description of Jewish power in the US.

    If you have read all these books, I guarantee you, you will become an inveterate “anti-Semite” i.e. someone who cannot be cheated anymore about the Jewish Question (pathetic attempts by the ADL, SPLC etc. be damned).

    • Replies: @Bardon Kaldian
  91. @Bardon Kaldian

    “…why did urban, essentially ethnically alien Jews, identify themselves so much with Ukrainian/Russian peasantry? To me, this is enigmatic…”

    Answer: they didn’t “identify” with the peasants. They only pretended to do so, in order to use the peasants as a weapon against the Russian ruling class they wanted to destroy and replace with themselves.

    It is the same with rich middle-class Jews in the US, pretending to “identify” with poor Blacks. They do that only to use them as a weapon against Whites. It’s called “revolution-by-proxy”.

    • Replies: @Bardon Kaldian
  92. @Franklin Ryckaert

    I’ve read everything except Duke, who is bonkers. In have found in them a goulash of valuable material, fictions, semi-truthts, historical inaccuracies, a few good stories but unreliable stats…and, above all- a lack of talent for critical thinking, historical erudition, freely-associating writing style not conductive to an analytic-synthetic reasoning.

    These books contain valuable chapters, but as a whole, they’ll convince perhaps only Mengele’s ghost.

    • Replies: @Thomasina
  93. Vinnie O says:

    My go-to source for ordering books is BookFinder.com, which is a not itself a bookseller. But many booksellers choose to list their books with BookFinder.

    The Bookfinder listings for this book (which are VERY sensitive to how you spell Solzhenitsyn’s name and EXACTLY what you enter as a title) are a zoo, the like of which I have never seen on Bookfinder.

    The prices for USED copies in English run more that $250 USDs for EACH of the 2 volumes. This is WAY over my budget.

    The story BEHIND this book, and its suppression, must surely be as important as the book itself. The fact that the book has been so HEAVILY suppressed makes me wonder WHO ALL are behind the suppression. I’m thinking BOTH the CIA and Russian intelligence. (Comrade, you have shown interest in a certain book I will not name. It is in your best interests to FORGET you ever heard of such a book…)

    What more do we need to know about the state of our freedom.

  94. anarchyst says:

    “At what point, then, should one resist? When one’s belt is taken away? When one is ordered to face into a corner? When one crosses the threshold of one’s home? An arrest consists of a series of incidental irrelevancies, of a multitude of things that do not matter, and there seems no point in arguing about one of them individually…and yet all these incidental irrelevancies taken together implacably constitute the arrest. ”
    ― Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, The Gulag Archipelago: 1918-1956
    “And how we burned in the camps later, thinking: What would things have been like if every Security operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return alive and had to say good-bye to his family? Or if, during periods of mass arrests, as for example in Leningrad, when they arrested a quarter of the entire city, people had not simply sat there in their lairs, paling with terror at every bang of the downstairs door and at every step on the staircase, but had understood they had nothing left to lose and had boldly set up in the downstairs hall an ambush of half a dozen people with axes, hammers, pokers, or whatever else was at hand?… The Organs would very quickly have suffered a shortage of officers and transport and, notwithstanding all of Stalin’s thirst, the cursed machine would have ground to a halt! If…if…We didn’t love freedom enough. And even more – we had no awareness of the real situation…. We purely and simply deserved everything that happened afterward.”
    ― Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn

  95. @gotmituns

    “Where there is no anti-Semitism, there are no Jews.” Theodor Herzl

    This unintentionally humorous (and ironic) observation by Herzl is revealing. Is ‘anti-Semitism’ ubiquitous, inevitable… or something else altogether?

    What if ‘anti-Semitism’ did not exist? Would problems involving Jews go away?

    Of course not. And Herzl understood this fully.

    ‘Anti-Semitism’ is a deceptive, Jewish-generated term used to denigrate the efforts of gentiles to protect their interests as a separate people faced with the cunning machinations of an alien tribe. There’s an clear and obvious yin and yang to this conflict, though few Jews will concede as much.

    Indeed modern Jewry has actually succeeded in teaching most of the goyim to distrust their own instincts involving their personal interests as well as White self-preservation in general. Incredible, but true. The dominant, anti-gentile message is Jewish-oriented and implicitly hostile: Whites are dangerous, uniquely immoral, and are the sole beneficiaries of racial privilege. They are now teaching this toxic junk is California classrooms.

    Subtext: Admire the Jews. Feel guilty over them (as well as all non-Whites.) Don’t be proud of White accomplishments. Don’t trust your instincts.

    Oh sure.

    Our problem is threefold: 1) Jews see themselves as separate from and superior to gentiles. 2) Jews dominate the national airwaves and cultural megaphone. This gives them narrative control. 3) Jews do not respect our legitimate desire to protect/advance our interests as a distinct and separate people. Meanwhile, they expect us to unquestionably respect theirs. That’s chutzpah! (How very Jewish.)

    With these facts in mind, the case can be made that there is no such thing as ‘anti-Semitism’ (as Jews define it) since the term implicitly negates the legitimacy of anti-Jewish sentiment.

    Anti-Jewish sentiment however is useful, essential and warranted.

    After all, the continuing aversion/hatred/distrust of Jews is tied to real patterns of subversive Jewish conduct–not to mention supremacist Jewish theology. These are not incidental issues.

    Awareness and distrust of Jews is simply a self-defense mechanism. But Jews are working tirelessly to undermine this rational orientation by conflating awareness of (sometime destructive) Jewish behavior with the outright and unprovoked violence against Jews. This is a dishonest and manipulative ploy. After all, organized Jewry can indeed be harmful and destructive. This is Solzhenitsyn’s message.

    These fundamental facts underscores the enduring struggle between Jews and gentiles. Jewry however prefers to label this intermittent conflict ‘anti-Semitism’. Ha! Such self-serving reductionism. Jews constantly dream up pretentious excuses for themselves. By deception they do rule. But not forever.

    Jewish double-standards are ready indicators of moral chicanery. Today, America is saddled with boatloads of them. Thus Jews demand all-access entry into our world yet–at the same time–demand the right to erect/maintain walls against non-Jews whenever and wherever it suits them. And for this we still get to foot the bill. Entirely. Washington’s unconditional support of Israel is a glaring example of this orchestrated pathology.

    Worse still, truth-telling gentiles who complain about this pattern get tarred as ‘anti-Semites’. Lives get ruined. This is one of their very mean tricks. And there are others. Yet ‘anti-Semitic theory’ attempts to justify these deceptions, hits, and double-standards on the ground that ‘white supremacy’ (Nazism) is an ever-present threat. So the gloves are off.

    Conclusion: Jew aversion (misnamed ‘anti-Semitism’) is entirely rational. And necessary.

    Yet ‘anti-Semitic theory’ posits that this rational aversion/distrust of Jews by gentiles is actually irrational, ‘bigoted’, and morally repugnant. ‘Anti-Semitism’, they claim, is a sign of ‘mental illness’. Not true. Fear of the Jews is rational and warranted. We must not surrender to their ruthlessness.

    • Agree: Robert Dolan
    • Replies: @Skeptikal
    , @Anon
  96. @TheIdiot

    If you refer to Russian oligarch Abramovich, who “earned” his stupendous wealth by robbing the Russian people, following video highlights his 2 billion FLEET of obscenely expensive yachts: https://youtu.be/6kTR8BXvqNo

  97. @Franklin Ryckaert

    And Jews risked imprisonment & execution?

    Are you serious?

    • Replies: @Franklin Ryckaert
  98. Actually the translation of title is not in the same spirit.
    Together would be translated as kolektivne.
    V meste would be translated as in the same place.

    • Replies: @Skeptikal
  99. Thomasina says:
    @Bardon Kaldian

    Do you appreciate David Irving’s writings? Do you find him accurate?

    • Replies: @Bardon Kaldian
  100. After 73 years of atrocities against Palestinians [without any accountability or western outrage/R2P/whatever] my formal tenderness has turned into “Be done with it!”

    Oh, how I hate myself…

  101. annamaria says:
    @Robert Dolan

    Never underestimate the profiteering urge of the eager non-Jewish collaborators of Cheney-Bush-Clintons-Blair-Obamas kind. They would sell their mothers for profit. This is what a ‘business model’ of society does to a society. – No place for dignity.

    Why the little George Stephanopoulos (“a Greek Orthodox Christian … has earned a master’s degree in theology”) has been, eagerly, in service to the zionized war profiteers?
    At least the good people at Methodist Church have expelled the sadist petit Bush.

    Oh God, they all — M. Albright, Hilary, Samantha Powers, Pelosi, M. Obama, and the likes — are so monstrously ugly, as if their black souls were out on display. No wonder that a talk about reptiloids-in-charge is so popular.

    • Agree: Robert Dolan, Skeptikal
  102. TheIdiot says:
    @BorisMay

    Before they get to “castrate Unz” outside the UK

    UK becomes a new Gulag
    under this week’s legislation making it illegal to leave the country

    UK police gets unlimited powers to catch the escapees
    under last week’s legislation passed by the House of Commons

    Is UK preparing for a US+1 war “coalition”… in Siberia?

    • Agree: Rocha
  103. Kirt says:

    How can there not be a good English translation of the entire book after all these years? This strikes me as a great project for Mr. Unz.

    On the subject of what’s the point of all this, the truth is important and will set us free. No one should look for apologies nor should contemporary Jews apologize for Bolshevism anymore than contemporary Germans for Nazism or contemporary Mongols and Tartars for Genghis Khan and Tamerlane. I recall a conversation I once had with a young Russian Jewish lady who had fled the USSR for the US. With respect to Jews involved with Bolshevism during the revolution and afterwards, she said, “It was all their fault”. She said it matter-of-factly, not apologetically, and there is no reason she should have apologized for crimes committed long before she was born. That type of apologizing is simply cowardly virtue signaling. We have way too much of that in contemporary white Americans apologizing for the sins of slavers and slave owners.

    • Replies: @Colin Wright
  104. It would be interesting if Solzhenitsyn compared the Jewish relationship with Russia and its core ethnic groups with other minorities and their relationship to Russia; particularly, minorities largely engaged in enterprise and commerce i.e. Greeks or Armenians. Greeks have been in Russia in relatively large numbers since the fall of Constantinople and more so since the 18th century. Many Greeks even attained significant positions in Tsarist Russia. The Greek presence was due to either Greeks migrating there and Russia moving into lands with Greek populations such as Crimea, Stavropol Krai and surrounding areas. When the Soviets took power the community was deemed class enemies. Afterwards there was some liberalization and then mass deportations and then liberalization again. When the Soviet Union collapsed tens of thousands moved Greece although many of the Greek’s ancestors had not lived in the Aegean Basin for hundreds of years. Arguably, Greeks retain differentiated cultural markers compared to Russians (in this case language) just as much as Jews but the relationship seems to have been very different with Russia despite the occasional fit of Stalinist paranoia. Why is this?

    • Replies: @Max Powers
  105. @Bardon Kaldian

    ‘Alright, here are some good & great books about Jewish question normal people could read, if interested…’

    Just so long as we don’t read Two Hundred Years Together, eh?

    It’s so boring. You want to spare us. You care.

  106. TheIdiot says:
    @Bardon Kaldian

    You are absolutely right to say that

    Ashkenazis immigrants from Russia to US were NOT Jews

    They spoke Yiddish,
    a Slavic-German language that had nothing to do with then dead Hebrew

    of course this did not help the creation of the state of Israel
    alas Rotschild money was sufficient for the cultural, linguistic and religious conversion
    of this army of Kabbalah’s dispensable converted Turkic foot soldiers some of whom, sadly,
    had to be sacrificed in the qorbanoth

    As you surely know, even the kabbalah rabbis don’t agree with the sacrifice of the holocaust
    and even for them the word of the ha-meshiv is not the one they would like to hear on the subject

    shalom rav is perhaps better to you than sim shalom, i suppose

  107. Caruthers says:
    @Mephisto

    Jews have been whining about their ostensible powerless victimhood for millennia. Either they have always been lying and have never been powerless victims, or they have been victims as they claim but have refused to accept their domination by the goyim they have always hated (as evidenced by the hateful and enormously discriminatory prescriptions in their sacred Talmud).
    Your post is another instance of hypocritical double-standards: one for Jews, and a different one for the hated goyim.

  108. lloyd says: • Website

    Jews as is pointed out were not peasants. They were not in the upper classes either. They were predominantly merchants and small traders. Therefore their interest lay with that middle squeezed in between. That five percent of Jewry inside Russia were vital to the revolution becauue they were relatively a large proportion of the struggling middling class. Jewish fervour and cleverness contributed to the rest. There seem no evidence there was a Jewish conspiracy to rule or destroy Russia

    The German Government never denied Dreyfus was their spy as they would characteristically do. They would have done so if Dreyfus was innocent. Beilis perhaps was. But the repeaed stabbings of the child victim was charaterisitc of Jewish ritual murder accusations.

    • Replies: @HdC
  109. @Kirt

    ‘…On the subject of what’s the point of all this, the truth is important and will set us free. No one should look for apologies nor should contemporary Jews apologize for Bolshevism anymore than contemporary Germans for Nazism or contemporary Mongols and Tartars for Genghis Khan and Tamerlane…’

    …except that unlike contemporary Germans or modern Mongols, Jews retain the cultural outlook that made their crimes as revolutionary Bolsheviks possible.

    One may well forgive the serial killer and let bygones be bygones…but what if he’s still going out at night and looking for fresh victims? Look at what Jews appear to be attempting to do to our country right now.

    • Agree: Rocha
  110. KenH says:

    In at least three of the great Left-Right conflicts of the twentieth century (The Russian Civil War, World War II, and the Vietnam War) the propaganda war made the difference in favor of the Left. This is what the Left — especially the Jewish Left — is really good at. They’re much better at propaganda than the Right is, in fact.

    What the author calls propaganda Revilo P. Oliver calls pathological lying. Oliver had written about how the Bolshevik revolution succeeded by the use of pathological lying by leftist Jews.

    And this is how they are radicalizing large numbers of leftist whites and non-white Americans against right of center white Americans. Turn on CNN, MSNBC. PBS and any other left wing outlet and you’ll be greeted by pathological lying about current events, Trump, Republicans, the police and especially white people. They are seeding a revolutionary environment and arguable what led to the nation’s months long riots in 2020.

    • Replies: @anon
  111. Skeptikal says:

    A good contribution today from Miko Peled, about the self-hatred and actual anti-semitism of the “founding fathers” of Zionism, especially Theodor Herzl:

    https://www.mintpressnews.com/anti-semitic-birth-of-zionism-history-israel-self-hating-jews/276238/

  112. “Afterwards, once the Jewish Left has been thwarted, with the majority of Jews either assimilating into the gentile population once and for all or returning to Israel, only then can we seek the honesty and reconciliation that Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn so fervently asked for.”

    Why would you want Jews in gentile nations? Do Jews welcome non Jews in Israel? A Jew is a Jew and a White is a White. Oil and water don’t mix and it’s about time that they live off of each other not off gentiles. It’s time to go milk the cows in the desert and live the Russian cows alone!

  113. anon[327] • Disclaimer says:
    @KenH

    But, but, this article start off thus:

    No sane person wants to lie.

    Now I’m just so confused!

    • LOL: Schuetze
  114. Solzhenitsyn – opinion discarded

    Anyone that has taken the time to read the other side of the story can pretty easily determine that its at least 80% bullshit. I used to believe this kind of stuff too, then I started reading from the other side refuting it, and most of the time when you read the other side it actually makes sense. Like most right wing malarkey, its full of lies, lies by omission, semi-truths told with no context to make it sound super scary, or things just totally taken out of context. This is why I’ve learned to never trust anything coming from right wing writers. 99% of the time it lines right up with Angloid, CIA and Neocon propaganda, so I can usually safely assume its bullshit pretty easily. If you’re taking the side of Donald Rumsfeld, you may be on the wrong side! Lots of that in this article.

    Quite honestly I’d say Tsar got exactly what he asked for. As did the corrupt church and landowners. I’d say Solzhenitsyn probably earned his place in gulag as well for calling for the US to nuke Moscow. As did psychos like Menacham Begin.

    Does it not bother anyone that this dude was invited to speak at Harvard? The guy is literally doing propaganda for the empire and the rich.

    Supported the Vietnam War, while claiming to be Christian. Total waste of $$ and young white men. Killing untold numbers of Vietnamese civilians. Vietnam still dealing with the consequences. Laos still has problems producing its own food for all the unexploded ordinance left behind in their fields. Doesn’t sound very Christian to me!

    Solzhenitsyns own wife said he was full of shit. This guy has the credibility of Josh Wong or Bana Alabed. Many high profile and notable Russians have denounced him as a con artist and a loon.

    Oh muh God, there was a violent revolution and some folks got hurt! Yeah thats what generally happens in a revolution, which is why the govt. should probably try to avoid giving the people a reason to revolt. A lesson that still doesn’t seem to have been learned. Were there some bad actors among the revolutionaries, of course. This is true of every revolution.

    Do ” Jews” do bad things, yes. Does everyone do bad things, yes. I mostly think its stupid to spend so much time harping on “jews” when honkeys do all the same things, most of the time are even more ruthless in their greed. Greed is not unique to “Jews”. I will agree that many “Jews” are terrible people, I would call it a cult honestly. Most honkeys hate when when blacks blame all of them for what some whites do, so we should probably look at the “Jews” in the same way. Most of the people who scream loudest about collective guilt do the same thing themselves, the white nationalists are some of the worst at this, total hypocrites.

    I know people really enjoy the “Jew” blaming, and I don’t want to ruin it for anyone. But nowdays I just find most of it funny, like the comment section here, because most of it really is easily disproven for anyone who cares to look. I think we should be more focused on the Chicoms Dong of the 21st Century program myself, much bigger threat.

    We are swiftly losing our majorities in our homelands to hostile invaders who wish ultimately to subjugate us — and, sadly, many wealthy and influential Jews remain on the vanguard of this invasion.

    Stop invading and plundering if you don’t like people returning the favor. Simple.

    Instead, we will focus mostly on the acts of terror and atrocity attributed to Jews during the Soviet and pre-Soviet periods, which were of most immediate interest to Solzhenitsyn.

    Thats the problem of right wing writers, never any mention of the bourgeoisie acts of terror and atrocity that led to the backlash. Only one side of story is told, in a deceptive way at that.

    After the 1881 assassination of Tsar Alexander II and the widespread pogroms which followed, however, a critical mass of Jews then rose to pursue one goal: “the destruction of the current political regime.” Jews rapidly established international networks dedicated to Marxist and socialist revolution, and these networks had a profoundly negative impact upon Russia.

    It wasn’t just “Jews”, majority were pissed off non “Jews”. Many “Jews” sided with the opposition to the Bolsheviks, again a majority.

    The chapter begins with Tsar Nicholas’ October Manifesto of 1905 which, among other things, promised basic civil rights to all Russian citizens and established the Russian parliament known as the Duma.

    While he ordered troops and mercenaries to massacre workers and peasants protesting for their rights. Again, communists/workers and peasants asked nicely first, Tsar responds with lies and broken promises then violent repression and murder, what comes next is self defense. Sorry but those are the rules.

    As with much of volume two of Two Hundred Years Together, Solzhenitsyn demonstrates how Imperial Russia was highly imperfect under the Tsars, but remains far superior in many respects to the Soviet Union

    False, and easily so. According to many polls as much as 75% of the people in Russia preferred communism.

    Solzhenitsyn returns to his focus on the gulag system. This, understandably, is a short chapter given the vast, three-volume Gulag Archipelago which preceded it. However, Solzhenitsyn focuses on the Jewish Question here in the way he did only tangentially in Gulag. For example, he states that Jews had it easier than non-Jews in the gulag, and that they tended to make up the upper strata in these places.

    The US prison system is worse in many ways, certainly bigger, yet the right wingers never complain about it. They keep telling me the “Jews” run the country, so they should be outraged by this and out protesting these “Jewish” run gulags. Strange people.

    • Agree: soll, Jazman
    • Disagree: Colin Wright
    • Troll: Robert Dolan
  115. @Anonymous

    Solzhenitsyn’s Two Hundred Years Together English translation. This translation has been here for AGES!

    https://twohundredyearstogether.wordpress.com/

  116. Skeptikal says:
    @Colin Wright

    The thing is that with the newest translating AIs, it should be fairly easy to put the original Russian text through a translator and come out with a text that could be edited into good English.

    It would require pasting and copying paragraph by paragraph—from a pdf source text or some kind of scan that is then made into a pdf—and then pasting the translated paragraphs into another document. It could be a simple Word document, which could then be turned into a pdf and put online.

    I am not a techie, but it seems like it could be done.

    I was surprised that Yandex accepted a whole page from a text in a Russian economics journal. That is, I thought I had just copied the headline but it turned out, when I pasted into Yandex Translate, that I had copied the whole page. And the whole page of translated text was on the English side. A bit rough around the edges (there is a lot of technical jargon in this article) but absolutely acceptable.

    • Replies: @Colin Wright
  117. @Bardon Kaldian

    The alternative question is: Are you seriously suggesting they risked imprisonment & execution out of “idealistic altruism”?

    • Replies: @Bardon Kaldian
  118. Skeptikal says:
    @Zarathustra

    Wrong.
    Don’t you know how to use a dictionary?
    There are numerous good ones free online.
    For example, Pons (https://en.pons.com/translate/russian-english), or Yandex.

    Per Yandex (but also per my Oxford English-Russian and my first-year Russian uchebnik):

    together: вместе

    in the same place: в том же месте

    collective: коллектив

    коллективный: collective (adj)

    Jeez.

    • Replies: @Zarathustra
  119. wiggles says:
    @tomgreg

    Thank you so much for sharing the website , archive.org. I found the book and so many more! Wonderful resource !

  120. @redmudhooch

    “…Supported the Vietnam War, while claiming to be Christian. Total waste of $$ and young white men. Killing untold numbers of Vietnamese civilians. Vietnam still dealing with the consequences. Laos still has problems producing its own food for all the unexploded ordinance left behind in their fields. Doesn’t sound very Christian to me!…”

    “…Oh muh God, there was a violent revolution and some folks got hurt! Yeah thats what generally happens in a revolution, which is why the govt. should probably try to avoid giving the people a reason to revolt. A lesson that still doesn’t seem to have been learned. Were there some bad actors among the revolutionaries, of course. This is true of every revolution…”

    The Vietnam war cost about 3 million (mostly civilian) lives. Estimates of the victims of the Russian revolution run from 20 million to 40 million to 66 million…

    Muh difference!

    • Agree: Robert Dolan
  121. @Skeptikal

    ‘The thing is that with the newest translating AIs, it should be fairly easy to put the original Russian text through a translator and come out with a text that could be edited into good English.’

    Yeah. It’d be useful.

    On the other hand, a text by Solzhenitsyn on a topic like this both deserves and needs someone who both comprehends the various shades of meaning and stylistic nuances and can render them into English. Literary considerations aside, when one reads a given sentence, one doesn’t want to wonder if this is actually what Solzhenitsyn meant or merely the interpretation it was given by the White Nationalist or whoever who rendered it into English.

    There is actually a translation out there like that. Technically, it’s actually a translation of the German translation. Maybe it’s perfectly accurate. However, I’m disinclined to trust it.

    Practically, the ideal might be to do as you suggest — then find a student of Russian literature who can actually write well in English and who is both competent to go over the machine translation and amend it as necessary and who has the intellectual integrity to put Solzhenitsyn’s intended meaning ahead of his own preferences. I might want Solzhenitsyn to say the Jews were Russia’s curse — but the issue is whether that’s actually what he said.

    Supposedly, the Solzhenitsyn family foundation or whatever they call themselves is eventually going to produce a translation. It’d be nice to know when, precisely. Would they like to crowd-fund it? Let’s get on with it!

    • Replies: @Skeptikal
  122. @Bardon Kaldian

    I think you missed the major point of his analysis: Jews have no allegiance to the country they are in. They are parasites. They never have any respect for living there. They have no respect for anyone else. You can call it “Christian” influence but Solzhenitsyn thought people should be able to come together in a National Sense.

  123. Skeptikal says:
    @redmudhooch

    The best way to conduct this very necessary debate is for Solzhenytzin’s book to be translated ASAP into English. Then we can all look at it for ourselves and make up our own minds, or conduct a discussion/debate where we actually know what we are debating about.

    As is, it is like arguing about the Bible available only in Latin and only the priests know Latin.

    • Replies: @Bardon Kaldian
  124. @Thomasina

    David Irving’s writings are, with a few exceptions- trash.

    • Replies: @Colin Wright
  125. @Franklin Ryckaert

    Are you seriously comparing blacks and Russian peasants?

    Blacks, as far their leaders’ rhetoric goes, are against white civilization with roots in Britain in Europe; Russian peasants are embodiment of (coarser aspects) of Russian culture, identity & nationality. Blacks are anti-American; Russian peasants are super-Russian.

    Goltz and Gershuni were simply following ideological currents of Bakunin, Herzen, Kropotkin and Lavrov, all of whom were ethnic Russians & were against czarist quasi-feudal oppression, but imagined some future where agrarian socialism would be the best way of life. They were anti-capitalist; anti-feudal; and most of all, fighting for liberation and well being of Russian peasantry.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialist_Revolutionary_Party

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grigory_Gershuni

    • Replies: @Franklin Ryckaert
  126. Dumbo says:
    @Bardon Kaldian

    So only books written by Jews, not by gentiles… Got it…

    Are you Jewish? This would explain your hatred of Serbians too… 😉

    Ah no, I guess for that being Croat is enough. 😀

    Anyway, I have no idea why you believe Jews should not be criticized just like any other group.

    If “200 years together” was about Germans, or Chinese, or even Serbians, it would have been translated and published years ago. The only reason it wasn’t, it’s because it’s about Jews. That’s all. It’s verboten to talk honestly (or really in any way) about Jews. Unless you’re a Jew. I mean, some Jews are great, alright, but I don’t get it why they should have special rights denied to everyone else.

  127. The Wikipedia entry on Two Hundred Years Together manages to be unintentionally revealing.

    It essentially vilifies the book, citing (at a rough count) a dozen sources to do so. The difficulty is, nine of those twelve sources appear to be Jewish, and of the three gentile sources, one is quoted from a source of dubious authenticity, while the remaining two aren’t particularly critical.

    …so now we know two things. Jews don’t like the book, and it has yet to be properly translated into English.

    • Replies: @Commentator Mike
  128. JWalters says:
    @Mark Hunter

    Excellent point, I completely agree. I also appreciate the article’s goal of identifying effective tactics for this struggle. For me, I was brought on baord by learning hard facts which I had not known before. I have never been impressed by someone trying to deceive me. So I think that would be a devastatingly self-defeating strategy.

    A strategically important fact, it seems to me, is that not all Jews are involved in the plot to control the world. Talking about “the Jews this…” or “Jews that …” is a credibility killer. What is credible is that a few ultra wealthy Jews are abusing their wealth, both in “legal” rigging the game, and outright criminality. And there is a ton of evidence to support that. It’s also true that a lot of people, both Jews and non-Jews have been duped into thinking that criticism of Israel and Zionism is due to mindless anti-Semitism. For example, here’s a Jewish therapost born in Israel,
    “It’s time for American Jews to recognize they have been duped”
    http://mondoweiss.net/2015/07/american-recognize-duped

    Waking American Jews up to the fact that they hae been brainwashed since childhood into a knee-jerk defense of criminals in their midst would completely turn the tide on this whole problem. That has happened, and will continue to happen, only happen with solid facts.

    Waking up American non-Jews is happening, and will continue to happen, in the same way.

  129. Dumbo says:
    @Bardon Kaldian

    A book missing in that list is “The Jews” by Hilaire Belloc. Amazingly, it’s still on Amazon, and you might be even able also to find a free pdf somewhere. It’s sort of what the Catholic view used to be, I guess, before Vatican II and all that.

    • Agree: Robert Dolan
    • Replies: @Bardon Kaldian
  130. @JWalters

    “…Waking American Jews up to the fact that they have been brainwashed since childhood into a knee-jerk defense of criminals in their midst would completely turn the tide on this whole problem…”

    Theoretically yes, but the majority will always “circle the wagons”.

    • Replies: @JWalters
  131. @Bardon Kaldian

    “…Are you seriously comparing blacks and Russian peasants..?”

    I am seriously comparing Russian Jews with American Jews, and I see that they used similar tactics.

    • Replies: @Bardon Kaldian
  132. @Franklin Ryckaert

    Don’t use the red herring stuff on me, I’m way beyond that.

    I said:

    1. many Russian Jews had been, politically, massively involved on the side of the Russian core population, Ukrainian & Russian peasants

    2. hence, it is an easily refutable lie that they always try to subvert or dispossess their ethnic host nation

  133. @Dumbo

    This book is worthless (I’ve read it). Beloc was certainly a great stylist, but his literary legacy has dimmed. This may be true for most free-associating essayists, with only a handful of exceptions. Arnold, Ruskin, Pater, Chesterton, Taine, Belinsky, Lunacharsky …are now alive only in a few works.

    • Replies: @Dumbo
  134. @Agathoklis

    Because they’re not jews.

  135. Schuetze says:
    @JWalters

    To paraphrase:

    A strategically important fact, it seems to me, is that not all Germans are involved in the plot to control the world. Talking about “the Nazis this…” or “Nazis that …” is a credibility killer.

    An even bigger credibility killer is talking about “Holocaust this” or “Holocaust that”.

    Of course there are virtually no jews who actively support holocaust denial. But, in fact, the minute proportion of Jews supporting Holocaust denial is roughly the same as the minute proportion of Germans who are involved in the plot to control the world.

    Conversely, the proportion of Germans who secretly support the right of Holocaust denial would be also be of the same magnitude as the proportion of Jews who secretly support the theft of Palestine and Jews self proclaimed title of “Gods chosen people”.

    The only really relevant fact to be decided here is if Jews’ believing that they are Gods Chosen People, mandated by god to perform Tikkum Olan and reform the entire planet, is the same believing they have a right to “control the world”.

    As far as Jews waking up goes, I’ll believe it when holocaust denial laws are revoked across the west.

    • Replies: @JWalters
  136. @JWalters

    Talking about “The jews this” or “The jews that” is a credibility killer.

    So….then you go ahead and talk about the jews.

    Yes, it is obvious to anyone with a brain that it’s not ALL jews.

    But it IS the jews.

    Paul Nehlen found out the hard way.

    If you’ve spent any time at all on Twitter as a right leaning individual, you could not help but notice the insane level of pure HATRED leveled at whites from jews….from jewish writers to jewish academics to jewish lay people……just magnificent amounts of vicious loony hatred to all things white and Christian and traditional.

    Go public and criticize the jews and see what happens. Ask KMAC or Duke or even Fuentes about what happens if you fail to send anything but adoring love notes to the chosen.

    Tony Martin explained this phenomenon in detail.

    • Replies: @JWalters
  137. @Bardon Kaldian

    Don’t use the red herring stuff on me, I’m way beyond that. Non-naive goy speaking here.

    I said the Russian Jews pretended to be on the side of the Russian peasants. They wanted to use them only as “revolutionary material” to depose the Russian bourgeoisy and take their place, which was not difficult because they formed the leadership of the communist party. Once they were the leaders of the country they betrayed and enslaved the proletariat, but that was the plan all along.

    Similarly, American Jews wanted to use American Blacks only as “revolutionary material” to attack white America. The NAACP was originally funded and led by Jews.
    Main financier was no other than Jewish banker Jacob Schiff, who also had financed the Russian revolution with $20 million, a stupendous amount of money for that time (1917).

    You can sell the idea of genuine Jewish “solidarity with the downtrodden masses” only to the gullible, but those are not present on this forum.

    • Agree: Arthur MacBride
    • Replies: @Bardon Kaldian
    , @soll
  138. @Schuetze

    For anyone who doubts the massive Jewish presence in the Bolshevik Revolution I suggest this work by Jüri Lina: Under The Sign of The Scorpion
    https://archive.org/details/UnderTheSignOfTheScorpion/mode/2up

    • Thanks: Schuetze
    • Replies: @Arthur MacBride
  139. To whom it may concern; Author included especially.

    Good sir! A hard knot you take on! I read until you started quoting the book, as I have already read it. I find that your thoughts on the matter seem well-reasoned, balanced and just.

    However, I exhort you to consider one thing very keenly.

    From a tactical viewpoint, what you suggest strikes me as sound – using documented jewish criminality from such a reputable source as the great Solzhenitsyn – in order to shake up the masses from their slumber. And it is not an unjust cause.

    But, one thing you must keep in mind. Releasing the hatred of a population is a terrible thing. It is a mighty force, and very difficult to control once it gets going. History shows us this in indisputable clarity.

    Therefore, be wise, and be careful. One thing in particular I say you must – positively must – include in your overall strategy, and that is – the Love and Justice that Christ showed the world, and was Himself a divine example of.

    Somehow, someway, you will need to leave an opening for righteous jews – and keep it solidly, securely open, so that those jews who truly are righteous can slip through it.

    You must be able to say: “Our problem is not with Judaism, as properly interpreted. Abraham was a genuine prophet, and there were more, as Jesus stated in clear terms. Those who wish to follow Him are our fellows.”

    “After Abraham, and the other prophets until Jesus, many jews fell away – even most – but not all. And with those who sincerely kept to their ways – we have no problem, but welcome them as alllies”.

    Otherwise, you may be able to win small, scattered enclaves, perhaps a country or more, perhaps even the whole landmass of America – but the rest of the world will turn against you – and that you do not want. Nobody in their right minds would want that. That would be the end of this world, pure and simple.

    So – I pray that Christ may lead you – and that your hearts may not freeze over. They must be strong, and tough (they will need to be!), but still, they must need be pliant and alive – open to peace, and ultimately to mercy. To accomplish this, keeping your hearts pure, will not be the least of battles you will face, mark my words!

    Righteous muslims are also allies – their scripture tells them: “in religion, there can be no coercion”. Please, remember those words. They are wise and true.

    May God reign.

    • Replies: @Schuetze
  140. annamaria says:
    @Bardon Kaldian

    Historical facts do not support your assertion. There was a chasm between Dostoyevsky, Tolstoy, Stolypin and the “demons” of the Bolshevik Revolution — Lenin, Trotsky (Bronstein), Kaganovich, Zalkind, Goloshchyokin (Itsikovich) et al.
    The “demons” despised Russian peasantry. See Kaganovich Holodomor in Ukraine and Goloshchyokin [Itsikovich] Holodomor in Kazakhstan.

    Perhaps you need to familiarize yourself with Russian classics. For example, with this “greatest onslaught on Nihilism:” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demons_(Dostoevsky_novel)

  141. @Robert Dolan

    Solzhenitsyn said something to the effect that if people had had any idea how bad it would get, they would have done more to stop it.

    Look at this old lady being roughed up and arrested for not wearing a mask in a US bank:

    She actually appeals to other civilians asking “Are you ganna … is anyone like gonna get real here?” and someone answers bluntly “No” while the rest just look on. Now ask yourself what you would have done had you been an employee or a customer at that bank at that time. Or what would I have done? I guess if I was a worker I’d have kept my mouth shut; if a visitor I may have said something disapproving to the cop and probably been threatened to follow to the lockup unless I shut it. I mean what would be the point? That’s your reality.

  142. @Colin Wright

    Solzhenitsyn was getting published in the AngloUS world as long as he was spitting on the Soviets; tell the truth about the Jews – not allowed.

  143. The fact that this book has not been “officially” translated in English (and published) speaks volumes about the airtight control on the press and the banning of ideas deviating from the “official narrative” today in the collective west. Even more so when we consider the so-called “social media”, their owners and the owners’ agenda for world government. The bolsheviks might have been kicked out of Russia at the end of the 20th century, but at the beginning of the 21st they are already firmly entrenched in the west.

    • Replies: @soll
  144. @Franklin Ryckaert

    I said the Russian Jews pretended to be on the side of the Russian peasants. They wanted to use them only as “revolutionary material” to depose the Russian bourgeoisy and take their place, which was not difficult because they formed the leadership of the communist party. Once they were the leaders of the country they betrayed and enslaved the proletariat, but that was the plan all along.

    I think you could profit from a psychiatric help. If not, at least you’ve tried ….

  145. Dumbo says:
    @Bardon Kaldian

    This book is worthless (I’ve read it).

    If you say so, who are we to disagree? LOL.

    By the way, Belloc’s “Cautionary Tales for Children” are very funny.
    He also wrote many interesting essays on all kinds of subjects.

    Arnold, Ruskin, Pater, Chesterton, Taine, Belinsky, Lunacharsky …are now alive only in a few works.

    Again, only your (worthless?) opinion. Others might disagree.

    Essays in general tend to get older than novels or poetry because the context is in many cases no longer so relevant. So they are not reprinted so much. But they can still be very interesting.

  146. @Johnny Walker Read

    Thanks for a good link JWR.
    I read that book abt 10 years ago, very useful. It’s now in its 3rd edition.
    Jüri Lina’s focus is mainly on Freemasons/”Illuminati” rather than Jews per se so there is a slightly different slant and more extensive coverage …

    This book provides stunning information about the secret role of the freemasons in international politics, about the bloody upheavals in France in 1789 and in Russia in 1917. …

    https://jyrilina.com/english/under-the-sign-of-the-scorpion-the-rise-and-fall-of-the-soviet-empire/

    About JL
    https://jyrilina.com/english/about-jyri-lina/

    • Thanks: Johnny Walker Read
    • Replies: @Arthur MacBride
  147. utu says:
    @Bardon Kaldian

    “It is available, complete, in English” – It is not English. An atrocious machine translation. Why do you even bring it up?

    • Agree: Colin Wright
    • Replies: @Bardon Kaldian
  148. anon[744] • Disclaimer says:
    @Chris Moore

    > But their doctrinaire, entitled, royalist “chosen bloodline” conceit makes them arrogant

    Israeli Chosenites’ arrogance is openly displayed in the Jewish-authored New Testament. Acts 13:17 says, “The God of this nation of Israel chose our ancestors and made them multiply and grow strong during their stay in Egypt,” and Romans 9:4 states, “They are the people of Israel, chosen.” Throw that doctrinaire, entitled, royalist, conceited, arrogant Chosenite tripe in the trash.

    > in bed with Zionist

    Anybody who worships the Kang of Zion is in bed with — and frequently boned by — the Zionists. The Kang of Zion is described in both Jewish-authored Old Testament and Jewish-authored New Testament, thusly; Zechariah 9:9 says, “Rejoice greatly, Daughter Zion! Shout, Daughter Jerusalem! See, your Kang.” Matthew 21:5 parrots Zechariah nearly word-for-word, “Say to Daughter Zion, ‘See, your Kang.’” If some christmonger says, “Christ is Kang,” then finish the thought by reminding him, “Kang of ZION.”

    > Christians really can’t afford to be stupid anymore in dealing with sociopaths

    Ya think so? Then, exort the christmongers to stop worshiping the sociopaths! The Kang of Zion himself arrogantly proclaimed, “Salvation is from the Jewz.” You really have to be a special kind of stupid to swallow that sociopathic narrative.

    P.S. You were born right the first time; it’s OK to be born White.

  149. @Arthur MacBride

    From “New World Order University Forum”

    http://newworldorderuniversity.com/world-war-ii-primer/

    “In the Shadow of Hermes by JL. vdo from YT. JL documents the Jewish control over the Russian revolution and the Soviet Union.”

    This film is based on the Scorpion book.

    • Thanks: Alden, Johnny Walker Read
  150. soll says:
    @Franklin Ryckaert

    Schiff supported the February revolution and the Provisional Government, not the Bolsheviks in the October Revolution which is often misrepresented into the wrong revolution of 1917.

  151. soll says:
    @George Vlavianos

    The books not been translated into English as Solzhenitsyn viewed it as not important. His 6,000 page “Red Wheel” is his most important works which are ahead. Not some fantasy conspiracy of an international bestseller which totals over 3 million copies sold in both Russian/French editions being secretly “suppressed.”

    The current online English translations are missing whole chapters and passages, that contradicts this common neo-Nazi narrative that the Jews were behind either the 1905/1917 Russian revolutions which Solzhenitsyn refuted and dismisses. While existing versions are poorly translated with their redacted “editing” and selective bias.

    • Replies: @Colin Wright
  152. @Bardon Kaldian

    ‘I think you could profit from a psychiatric help. If not, at least you’ve tried ….’

    ? I think ‘but that was the plan all along’ is a bridge too far, but to that point, in what respect is Ryckaert’s analysis incorrect, much less deranged?

    As their vigorous participation in the persecution, dispossession, and reenserfment of the Russian and Ukrainian peasantry shows, Jews had a very hostile attitude towards the gentile populations of the former Russian empire. They were not their friends, whatever they may have told themselves.

    But more importantly, why is even the possibility so inadmissible to you that you feel compelled to abuse anyone who suggests it?

    • Replies: @Chris Moore
  153. @Skeptikal

    That is English interpretation not of somebody’s whose mother tongue is Russian.

    • Replies: @Zarathustra
  154. @Bardon Kaldian

    ‘David Irving’s writings are, with a few exceptions- trash.’

    I’d reverse that. I don’t belong to the cult of uncritical Irving admirers, but I feel he is no more guilty of distortion than any other historian — and less guilty than many!

    He just tends to distort matters in heretical directions. So I read him with the same critical eye I read anyone else. But PQ 17, The Virus House, Nuremberg, Hitler’s War, the Trail of the Fox, Dresden — these are all excellent books. I have criticisms to make — but Irving is a fine historian.

    • Agree: Arthur MacBride
  155. @soll

    ‘…The current online English translations are missing whole chapters and passages, that contradicts this common neo-Nazi narrative that the Jews were behind either the 1905/1917 Russian revolutions which Solzhenitsyn refuted and dismisses. While existing versions are poorly translated with their redacted “editing” and selective bias.’

    Exactly. Since I am inclined to indeed lend some weight to his words ‘because Solzhenitsyn said it,’ I’d like to be reasonably confident I am reading a complete and reasonably accurate text.

  156. @Bardon Kaldian

    “…I think you could profit from a psychiatric help…”

    Now you have betrayed your Jewishness. Further proof no more necessary. When all false arguments fail, accuse your opponent of being crazy. How typically Jewish!

    You made me already suspicious by calling all good books about the Jewish Question “trash” that will convince “only Mengele’s ghost”, and then suggesting your own list of books, all written by Jews, and all displaying only limited hangout.

    Whether you work for a Jewish organization, or work alone “doing your duty as a Jew”, you have now been busted, and hopefully will be ignored henceforth.

    • Agree: anarchyst
    • Replies: @Commentator Mike
  157. @utu

    It is a perfectly understandable translation without anything significant missing.

  158. @soll

    Revolution is revolution, nomatter what style. Schiff also deliberately refused to lend money to czarist Russia, while doing just that to Japan. This helped it to defeat Russia in 1905. Destroying Russia was a Jewish interest at that time.

    It is so again at present, because Putin made an end to the robbery of Russia by Jewish “oligarchs” (read: mega-gangsters). The whole hostile policy of the US toward Russia (entirely unnecessary) is only a Jewish construct.

    • Agree: Arthur MacBride
    • Replies: @soll
  159. @Zarathustra

    Actually English together would be more close translation is “druzhba” which is close to union.
    Obviously Solzhenitsyn purposely did avoid use these two terms.
    Vmeste is neutral avoiding to define relationship.

  160. Ron Unz says:
    @soll

    Schiff supported the February revolution and the Provisional Government, not the Bolsheviks in the October Revolution which is often misrepresented into the wrong revolution of 1917.

    That’s just propaganda and total nonsense. There’s strong even overwhelming evidence that Schiff was a key financial backer of the Bolsheviks, and remained closely aligned with them up to his death in 1920. You might want to read my 2018 article on those issues:

    https://www.unz.com/runz/american-pravda-the-bolshevik-revolution-and-its-aftermath/

    And here’s a short passage from the personal memoirs of Henry Wickham Steed, a leading foreign correspondent and former Editor of the Times of London, then the world’s most authoritative newspaper:

    Potent international financial interests were at work in favour of the immediate recognition of the Bolshevists. Those influences had been largely responsible for the Anglo-American proposal in January to call Bolshevist representatives to Paris at the beginning of the Peace Conference — a proposal which had failed after having been transformed into a suggestion for a Conference with the Bolshevists at Prinkipo. The well-known American Jewish banker, Mr. Jacob Schiff, was known to be anxious to secure recognition for the Bolshevists…

    …the prime movers were Jacob Schiff, Warburg, and other international financiers, who wished above all to bolster up the Jewish Bolshevists in order to secure a field for German and Jewish exploitation of Russia.

    A large number of additional links are also provided in a long comment of mine from earlier this year:

    https://www.unz.com/article/the-russian-revolution-separating-truth-from-myth/?showcomments#comment-4411642

    • Replies: @soll
  161. @Franklin Ryckaert

    Or he’s behaving like a good old communist commissar who would have sent you to a psychiatric unit for making such statements about Jews and communists.

    • Replies: @Franklin Ryckaert
  162. moi says:
    @Mephisto

    Christian and Jews–same difference.

  163. @Commentator Mike

    Yes, but his reference to “Mengele’s ghost” betrays him as a Jewish commissar.

  164. Wielgus says:
    @Colin Wright

    Tolstoy wrote a pamphlet criticising Shakespeare. He particularly focused on King Lear. George Orwell reviewed the English translation of the pamphlet, disparaging it, but noting that it was obscure and would have been even more so were it not that it was written by the author of War And Peace. However, it was translated.
    Some quite obscure stuff by Solzhenitsyn has been translated and I doubt whether excepting this is because it is thought to be boring.

    • Agree: Colin Wright
  165. soll says:
    @Ron Unz

    We have already been through this before, your cited passages refer to Schiff’s support in the Provisional Government and his negative views at response towards the Bolsheviks.

    The most balanced review on Schiff’s influence is found in the 2010 essay, “Why did Jacob H. Schiff decide to financially sponsor the Russian Revolutions of 1917” by Delphine Slotten

    “In the context of primary sources from the era and subsequent historiographical analyses, I determined that Jacob H. Schiff’s sponsorship of the March 1917 revolution was primarily motivated by his dedication to the cause of the Jewish people. As for the November 1917 Bolshevik Revolution, no substantial and credible sources exist to determine motivations for Schiff’s sponsorship and to even support the claim that sponsorship occurred. ”

    https://www.schiffnaturepreserve.org/JacobSchiffEssay.pdf

  166. @Colin Wright

    I think ‘but that was the plan all along’ is a bridge too far,

    Not once you understand that Western Jewish bankers were backing the Bolsheviks. Not once you see that the Bolsheviks were an extension of the British Empire’s Great Game against Russia. Not once you understand that imperialist-minded neocon Republicans are in bed with the Zionist Dems against the historic American people today, and still at war with Russia (along with much of the rest of the world) for imperialist purposes, masquerading as “democracy.”

  167. @soll

    In February there was no revolution. You are wrong. In February there was bloodless putsch.
    In October there was revolution. In February only ruling class changed its leader without any participation of plebs.

  168. soll says:
    @Franklin Ryckaert

    Not just “Jewish interest at that time” there was general disdain against the Tsarist regime throughout Russia, it was only following their 1905 revolution that they even acquired a free press, which had been closed since 1866 as mildly relaxed in 1855, including representation in the new Duma which followed. The peasants still wanted land rights to an 8-hour day which Lenin gave them. Previously working conditions before 1917 had peasants moving and working in the cities for up to 18-hour days.

    The Jews were held in the Pale of Settlement to cause much influence, its why with their emancipation came their support for the Bolsheviks (worth noting that the general population knew little to nothing about who Lenin and the Bolsheviks were). Lenin received their support, over 10 million votes by his promise of bread, land and peace.

    Even stating “Destroying Russia…” is wrong. The issue was over the Tsarist rule not Russia itself. Russia was being industrialized in the late 1800s from financing from around the world, like the United States, Canada and Great Britain. It’s why the peasants moved into the cities and were working such long hours resulting in the 1905 revolution.

    • Replies: @annamaria
  169. Chris Moore says: • Website

    You’re fixating on the minutia of the Bible, Talmudist-like, while ignoring the arc of the story, which shows a process exposing the egoism and folly of the Hebrew rabble — rabble summarily executed by Moses for grifting, whoring and treason, and later again exposed by Jesus, only to have them conspire to put him to death as vengeance for revealing them as treason-doers acting as Moneychangers for the Roman occupation.

    That same treachery and treason is again fully on display today as heirs of that same rabble, now mixed with Khazar scum and the scum of every other nation they’ve plagued since, have snowballed into a monolithic Zionist albatross.

    A glance around at the “chosen-elect” scum of the earth today will demonstrate Zionist connections wall to wall, from far-left to neocon Judeofascist right.

  170. Schuetze says:
    @Thomas Faber

    “Somehow, someway, you will need to leave an opening for righteous jews – and keep it solidly, securely open, so that those jews who truly are righteous can slip through it.”

    Righteous jews, lol.

    Napoleon tried that over 200 years ago, and already in 1848 Jews were trying to take over all of Europe. Fast forward to today, and clearly Napoleon, the Freemason, liberated the jews to not only take over all of Europe, but to take over the entire planet. Today our planet is known as “Planet Covid”. Take the jew-juice jab, noahide slave.

    “Through his policies overall, Napoleon greatly improved the condition of the Jews in France and Europe, and they widely admired him. Starting in 1806, Napoleon passed a number of measures enhancing the position of the Jews in the French Empire. He recognized a representative group elected by the Jewish community, the Sanhedrin, as their representatives to the French government.

    In conquered countries, he abolished laws restricting Jews to living in ghettos. In 1807, he designated Judaism as one of the official religions of France, along with Roman Catholicism (long the established state religion), and Lutheran and Calvinist Protestantism. (Followers of the latter had been severely persecuted by the monarchy in the late 17th and early 18th centuries.)”

    • Replies: @Chris Moore
  171. JamesinNM says:

    Read Romans 2:28-28 and compare that text with the text of Revelation 2:9 and 3:9. Also research the reader survey titled “Defense of True Israel” at the http://www.missiontoisrael.org website. Perhaps, after Christ’s death, burial, and resurrection, the born again Christians are the real Jews and God’s chosen people.
    You might also research the history of Khazaria and the Khazars and what they did to Russia, to Germany twice, and to others.

  172. @Colin Wright

    Your not fixing the sink because your lazy….not because you committion genocide on millions of Russians and FEAR retribution.
    Translating and publishing this book leads to the awakening of the masses and the REAL question of WWII and the HOLOHOAX. One leads to the next. If planet earth understands why Germany rounded up all the Jews…the gig is over. They know this.

  173. @soll

    I did not read the essay, just the abstract & the conclusion. Yet, it is not clear: did he finance the 2nd revolution or not? Yes or no?

    I don’t care about imbecile fantasies on “Jewish bankers’ conspiracy”; I just want to know- did Schiff give money to Bolsheviks or not?

    If he did, they simply used the money & went their own way.

    Be as it may, these things are not clear, and remain something of a puzzle, whether one considers him or them. There must be some documents yet unearthed.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  174. Ron Unz says:
    @soll

    We have already been through this before, your cited passages refer to Schiff’s support in the Provisional Government and his negative views at response towards the Bolsheviks.

    The most balanced review on Schiff’s influence is found in the 2010 essay, “Why did Jacob H. Schiff decide to financially sponsor the Russian Revolutions of 1917” by Delphine Slotten

    Fanatic Jewish-activist types such as yourself are notoriously immune to factual debate. There’s a famous passage in Hitler’s Mein Kampf describing that unfortunate tendency.

    I looked at Slotten’s short essay. All credible contemporaneous observers, including leading political figures, top journalists, and American, British, and French Intelligence agreed that Schiff had been a crucial financial backer of the Bolsheviks, and his own grandson later confirmed that fact. But you prefer to emphasize that some writers two or three or four generations later say “Nope, it never happened!” while they also claim that almost none of the leading Bolsheviks were Jewish even though everyone knows that almost all of them were. Obviously, if they said anything different, they would lose their funding or get purged.

    Those so interested in this and related topics might want to take a close look at a long article of mine from a couple of years ago, which focused upon the absolutely fascinating discoveries of prominent Holocaust historian Joseph Bendersky, produced by his ten years of exhaustive archival research:

    https://www.unz.com/runz/american-pravda-secrets-of-military-intelligence/

    • Thanks: Arthur MacBride
    • Replies: @Arthur MacBride
  175. Chris Moore says: • Website
    @Schuetze

    The Ten Commandments, like the US Constitution, are a restraining ideal that Hebrew/Khazar/Zionist rabble, organized criminals and gangsters are not civilized enough to live by. That doesn’t mean the Constitution and the Ten Commandments are illegitimate and invalid; it means the Zionists and their whores are illegitimate and invalid.

    When you say Everything that came from the Hebrews and the Bible is bogus, you’re throwing out some of the seminal documents of Western Civilization, which is exactly what the Zionists and Judeofascists want.

    These animals who don’t want to live like civilized human beings — and there are plenty of non-Zionists among them, too — love the blanket rejection of the restraints of civilization, which they find cumbersome to their style, their narcissism and egomania.

    They think they are so “chosen” and “evolved” that any restraints should be for the disposable goyim and barbarians only. They don’t see the seeds of the end of the human race lie in their arrogance and ambition.

    It’s little wonder they’re pimping AI and quasi-human, potion-injected, biotech hybrid freaks. It’s little wonder they’ve contrived a plandemic to justify it.

    To hell with them.

    • Agree: Zarathustra
  176. Anon[245] • Disclaimer says:
    @mark green

    You list 3 problems… and forget the 4.
    “Most Whites [specially the more learned and intelligent — because they are just much more into last-stage narcissism than average folks] love 1 2 3, are ready to attack any other White who doesn’t share their love, and compete, stimulated by the crowded Internet environments, to show their love”.

    Then, thinking it a bit more, you’d possibly realize that should be listed as first, not forth, in the list.

    Worse still, truth-telling gentiles who complain about this pattern get tarred as ‘anti-Semites’. Lives get ruined. This is one of their very mean tricks.

    No, that’s one of the outcomes of point “4”, actually point 1, you prefer not to list, or see.

  177. Skeptikal says:
    @Colin Wright

    ” then find a student of Russian literature who can actually write well in English and who is both competent to go over the machine translation and amend it as necessary’

    The editor of the translated text has to be a native English speaker with a good knowledge of Russian. The final result has to be English, not “Renglish.” Professional translators know when to add a “translator’s note.”
    There is always plenty of scope for disagreement and discussion in just about any translation. A good professional translator tries to render the author’s meaning and not distort it. If you have done any translating you know that it takes effort and distance to avoid interference from the original language that makes for a stilted, unreadable text.
    The ideal is for two who are bilingual to work together: one native Russian speaker and one native English speaker.

    However, I was talking about the idea of using available means to make a decent basic translation available, not about producing an “official” or perfect literary translation.
    Obviously, I think.

  178. Thomasina says:

    Spencer Quinn – fascinating article. Very well written. Thank you!

  179. @Bardon Kaldian

    ‘…Solzhenitsyn had succeeded to cast doubt on two issues: the scope of pogroms in czarist Russia & the idea that Stalin wanted to orchestrate a massive pogrom after the Doctor’s plot. That’s all. There is not anything truly new in Solzhenitsyn’s book.’

    I’ve read and gathered enough from what is out there to be certain this is not accurate.

    Why are you so concerned to keep people from being interested in the book?

    • Replies: @cohen
  180. glib says:
    @Bardon Kaldian

    For those new to the internet, follow Bardon’s replies in this thread. It is the definition of a troll. Strawmen, distortion of arguments, the whole arsenal. And I am even one who thinks some good things came out of the Bolshevik revolution.

    • Agree: Colin Wright
  181. cohen says:

    I am ready to take factual information from anyone, troll or no troll. It is better than listening idiots from NYTimes or Washington compost or for that matter from Wikipedia when it comes to Israeli related information with thousand of volunteer trolls. Any Questions?

  182. Ace says:
    @Anonymous

    Westerners by and large think like children or women. They quail before mere words and drink deeply from the well of official fairy tales. The laws crucify people who defend themselves or if they defend white interests. Then you hear those whistles blow.

  183. cohen says:
    @Colin Wright

    Why you guys are afraid of facing truth. I saw your comments about David Irvin books. TRASH.
    Did you take the time to check his facts. I did. You would believe Steven Speeeeeel Burgggg selling fictions as facts. Or holllllywooooooo, Where they proudly show Vietnamese soldiers wearing Nazi hats and morons believing in such depictions. I bet in future we will have movies about civil war or any old war bad guys wearing Nazi hats. It is coming, hang in there.

    You type of people need upgrade to keep up with what is going on. Put a new chip in your brain with more RAM

    • Replies: @Colin Wright
  184. Regarding morons who have expressed their opinions in this thread:

    Why so many people here can’t keep a rational discussion?

    Or, even more important: why are so many people interested in an interlocutor’s person? And think that her/his person is of crucial importance when discussing some issue?

    To me, all present here (any anywhere) mean nothing as human beings of this or that kind & I don’t give a hoot about their biographies or personalities. All that matters is the weight of an argument.

    Discussion, if it is a discussion & not just a fun of posting comments, a rambling pastime or anything similar, should be as impersonal as possible. Only arguments matter.

    And, the real question is: how to have a qualified discussion about anything?

    Some of the prerequisites are:

    1. one has to possess a degree of detachment. If you’re emotionally too involved with the issue, you cannot participate in a qualified discussion. Being too involved frequently – not necessarily- means using ad hominem “arguments”, which is a waste of time.

    2. one has to have knowledge of the field discussed. If you’re not informed, better stay out of it. In many cases, being informed means having read 20+ books on the topic.

    3. one has to possess analytic-synthetic ability or logical culture (I don’t know how else to put it). If you’re mostly imaginative/freely associating type, better leave it to others (not that imagination is bad, it is great, but without logic it just creates muddle)

    4. you have to have the ability to listen, ponder on others’ arguments (if they’re worth it) & not just preach your cause. If not, this is not a discussion. It is, on your part, a sermon.

    There must be a few other points, but the above mentioned are basics of qualified discussion culture.

    Personally- I don’t have the time to waste on lunatics & psychos.

  185. annamaria says:
    @soll

    You mean, Warburg and Schiff were financing the murderers and rapists by paying Japan (see Russo-Japanese War of 1904/1905), the agitators among the POWs, and the Jewish trash of Bronstein-Zalkind kind, but, nevertheless, Warburg and Schiff were innocent of the destruction of Russia, the mass slaughter of the best and brightest in Russia (including officer corps, Christian clergy, and nobility) and the murder of children of Tsar’s family.
    Actually, Warburg and Schiff were not innocent. They were busy with arranging and paying for the mass-slaughter-on-order in Russia in the name of “the dedication to the cause of the Jewish people.”

    Warburg and Schiff were motivated by their talmudist hatred for Amalek in Russia.
    That is the same hatred the Oded Yinon Plan for Eretz Israel is dripping with. The multitude of dead children in the Middle East is the result of the Jewish Community’s “dedication to the cause of the Jewish people.” See Israel’s efforts to save “moderate jihadis” of murderous White Helmets and the Israels’ generous supply of Israel-made rifles to self-proclaimed neo-nazi in Ukraine.

    It is amazing how much murder, rape, looting, and despicable sadism have been approved by the Jewish Community at large in the name of “dedication to the cause of the Jewish people.” In the context of the hideous holobiz museums, yours (and Slotten’s) protestations lack both decency and dignity.

  186. annamaria says:
    @soll

    “The 1905 revolution was spurred by the Russian defeat in the Russo-Japanese War” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1905_Russian_Revolution

    “Russo-Japanese War financed by Jacob Schiff” https://strangeside.com/russo-japanese-war-financed-by-jacob-schiff/

    Without lifting a gun, Jacob H. Schiff crushed the Czarist army and plunged its finest battleships down to a watery grave! Schiff, a direct descendant of the Maharam Schiff, was born in Frankfurt in 5607/1847. Although he studied at Rav Samson Raphael Hirsch’s religious school, it can hardly be said that he kept to his alma mater’s standards once he had left for the US at the age of eighteen. Instead, he devoted his energies to high finance and became managing director of Kuhn, Loeb & Co., one of the two most influential private international banking houses of the Western Hemisphere. …

    “[It was not] so much [because of] my father’s interest in Japan,” his [Schiff] daughter, Frieda, explained later, “but, rather, his hatred of Imperial Russia…”.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jacob_Schiff

    What was perhaps Schiff’s most famous financial action was during the Russo-Japanese War, in 1904 and 1905. Schiff met Takahashi Korekiyo, deputy governor of the Bank of Japan, in Paris in April 1904. He subsequently extended loans to the Empire of Japan in the amount of $200 million (equivalent to $4.5 billion in 2019[10]), through Kuhn, Loeb & Co.These loans were the first major flotation of Japanese bonds on Wall Street, and provided approximately half the funds needed for Japan’s war effort.

    Jacob Schiif was a Murderer at heart. A regular talmudist ready to murder millions of innocent human beings in the name of “the dedication to the cause of the Jewish people.” Close your holobiz museums already.

    • Replies: @Zarathustra
  187. @Bardon Kaldian

    morons who have expressed their opinions in this thread:

    … What all said morons have to do to to satisfy me …

    I don’t have the time to waste on lunatics & psychos.

    An interesting post, BK.

    Do you still have to take medication since they let you out ?

    I mean, they have let you out, haven’t they … or maybe … well, yes, too bad …

  188. @Bardon Kaldian

    “…Personally- I don’t have the time to waste on lunatics & psychos…”

    And that is the way you characterize your opponents when you can’t win the argument, in spite of your own highfalutin prescriptions for a valuable discussion.

  189. @Ron Unz

    a certain Janet Mertz,

    Here’s hoping she got to read your essay, Ron Unz … lol …

    That America’s national government of the early 1940s actually came within a hair’s breadth—or rather a heart-beat—of falling under Communist control is a very uncomfortable truth. And our history books and popular media have maintained such total silence about this remarkable episode

    I knew abt FDR’s armed provocation of German shipping and as do many now his calculated sacrifice of USN personnel in Hawaii to provoke war with Japan/Axis. Not abt deceiving the Portuguese as a means, nor about Bendersky’s “research” and book. Churchill’s role in bombing civilians is I hope now reaching a wider audience.

    Thank you for an excellent informative essay.
    That these quite disgraceful events are not the topics of WW2 discussion in mainstream media speaks volumes about who owns said media and their “journalists”.

  190. @Bardon Kaldian

    Ya right! Obviously you are of dictator personality, and you want to introduce dictatorship here.
    This site is the best site in the world because it is the only democratic website in the world.
    There is the old saying that sometime even the blind chicken finds a grain.
    And so even the stupid person can have a brilliant idea.
    In my opinion only spamming should be pointed out.

  191. @annamaria

    It was England Admiralty That improved the design of Japanese battleships and did teach Japanese to fight.

  192. @cohen

    We need an ‘idiot’ button.

    • Replies: @cohen
    , @TheIdiot
  193. Schuetze says:
    @Bardon Kaldian

    Regarding morons who have expressed their opinions in this thread:

    Why so many people here can’t keep a rational discussion?

    To me, all present here (any anywhere) mean nothing as human beings of this or that kind

    Personally- I don’t have the time to waste on lunatics & psychos.

    Don’t let the door hit you on the way out, you arrogant prick.

    • Replies: @Franklin Ryckaert
  194. @Schuetze

    He now can report to his boss in Tel Aviv: “Mission not accomplished”.

  195. I’m definitely no anti-Semite. That doctrine, like Bolshevism, has the stench of post-religious fanaticism. I think it’s possible to make roughly accurate generalizations about both the virtues and vices of any social group but mistaken to assume that the generalizations apply to any individual in that group.

    The anti-Semites said, “Read Solzhenitsyn’s Two Hundred Years! That proves the idea of JudeoBolshevism.” I’m appalled by the monstrousness of Bolshevism, and I’m a curious person. I read the samizdat English translations with great interest.

    Solzhenitsyn is not an anti-Semite. Anti-Semites and Philo-Semites each think him so simply because he was as critical of the Jews as he was of the Russians, and as admiring of the Russians as he was of the Jews. He interprets both Russian history and Jewish history charitably, attempting to dispassionately report the goods and bads, the rights and wrongs, of each people. Jewish participation in Bolshevism was large, but accidental rather than essential, I learned from Solzhenitsyn.

    And Solzhenitsyn is noble in calling for these two peoples to reconcile on the basis of candid assessment, mutual understanding, and repentance. Right now, the U.S. is tearing itself apart as multiple minoritarians in a neobolshevik spirit crudely seek to reverse a few real and several imagined hierarchies, rather than seeking for all to live as equals. The only alternative to violence in the long run is for all contesting groups to reconcile in the way that Solzhenitsyn recommends. That’s not impossible, liberal indifference worked for 150 years and is in the horizon of possibilities.

    • Replies: @Zarathustra
  196. cohen says:
    @Colin Wright

    I am proud to be an idiot. How about your sir?
    Should I say a legend in your own mind. and when you look in the mirror I bet you put a smile just to stroke your ego. Your days of deception are coming to an end.

    Regarding Historian David Irvin, why there were swimming pools, post office, children play ground, theaters, and football games facilities in the concentration camps? How come the visitors are given selective building tours in Auschwitz . I visited the facility. David Irvin, and David Cole had visited and wrote about the camp. How about you.
    You , instead of learning that you are allergic to, just sit in your living room jerking of in front of your cat And fantasizing love making with a sheep. I caution you that in the State of Mississippi such acts are against the law.
    I am ready for your lies. Shalom

    • Replies: @Colin Wright
  197. @New Dealer

    Keep on going. eventually you will get there.

    • Replies: @New Dealer
  198. cohen says:
    @Bardon Kaldian

    The girl should be given a Pulitzer prize by no one other than Thomas Friedman of NYT. what is source of this video or it could be downloaded from UNZ. I would to share the free information with others.

    • Replies: @Bardon Kaldian
  199. TheIdiot says:

    Bardon Kaldian on this thread is the Agent Smith from “The Matrix”

    Alone the effort of the many Agents to kill this thread,
    let alone their success in killing the book for the last 20 years

    Should make you READ THE BOOK, if you can understand
    legitimate publications in French, German, Serbian, Russian

    This IS the most DANGEROUS publication of the last 125 years
    based on the Agents Smith reaction

    P.S.: if you have a million to spare, you should pay for it to be translated… professionally

    • Replies: @Colin Wright
  200. TheIdiot says:
    @Colin Wright

    i have a weekly appearance schedule

    • Replies: @Colin Wright
  201. @cohen

    As I say, we need an ‘idiot’ button.

    • Replies: @cohen
  202. @TheIdiot

    ‘i have a weekly appearance schedule’

    Unfortunately, so does ‘cohen.’

  203. @TheIdiot

    ‘P.S.: if you have a million to spare, you should pay for it to be translated… professionally’

    I was thinking it should be possible to arrange a passable job for fifty thousand or so.

    The right person is out there. It’s just a matter of identifying him.

    • Replies: @cohen
  204. cohen says:
    @Colin Wright

    Say some intelligent and new.
    So you and your cohorts celebrated the 21 March, The day Israeli Bulldozers murdered an innocent American named Rachel Corrie, a 24 years old innocent activist from Seattle. Did you write anything? about that brutality? Mr self righteous?
    I hope you are using organic Vaseline when you are jerk of to stay healthy.

    Enjoy yourself

    • Replies: @Colin Wright
  205. cohen says:
    @Colin Wright

    I was right identify you as a “Legend in your own mind”
    Talks some facts instead of all these distractions “translation…. Blah blah” Facts and facts. Not cut and paste writing.
    Where is the beef? where are Nobel Prize winner, enemy of innocent people, tattoo. How did he managed to erase those.
    How much the Nobel committee was paid or which members were blackmailed by folks like Jerrery Epstein a Saudi passport holder.

  206. @Zarathustra

    The anti-Semites are enamored of Zarathustra, the “divine man”; and there is a particular anti-Semitic interpretation of it that made me laugh greatly.

    F.N. to Overbeck, March 24, 1887

    • Replies: @Zarathustra
  207. @cohen

    ‘…Did you write anything? about that brutality? Mr self righteous?
    I hope you are using organic Vaseline when you are jerk of to stay healthy.’

    I would seem to have made a new friend.

  208. cohen says:

    I dont thinks so. You are a legend in your own mind and I am a simple idiot. Opposite end of poles. I did look the definition of idiot in the dictionary and found my picture next to the word idiot.

    I peeked at your essay on Columbus and wondered about the genius writer who just sat in his living room and made up his own facts. Paraphrasing, Columbus helped the Indians………. The writer must be thinking of Indians from India and not the natives in Americas. Columbus was tried in Spanish court for the murder of indigenous people and there were two Jesuit priest who testified against him. Go and read in Spanish museums archives. Do some work.

    Do you know whose navigational maps Columbus used? He did not make those himself.

  209. @Bardon Kaldian

    Really? Funny, many Jews and Jewish sources confirmed what Solznhenitsyn wrote:
    Letter from Bernard Baruch to Karl Marx, 1888:
    – “The jewish people taken collectively will be it’s own Messiah. His reign over the universe will be obtained by the unification of the human race and through the elimination of frontiers. A universal republic will come into being in which the sons of Israel will become the directing element, will be all of the same race and the same traditional culture without, however, forming another nationality, and will be without contradiction the leading element in all parts, particularly if it is successful in laving upon the masses of workers a permanent leadership by some jews. The governments of peoples all pass with the formation of the universal republic effortlessly into the hands of the israelites in favour of the victory of the proletariat. The personal property of the rulers will be able to be suppressed by the rulers of the Jewish race who will everywhere govern the property of the peoples. The the promise of the Talmud will be fulfilled that when the time of the Messiah has come, the jews will have the goods of all peoples of the world in their possession.”

    Heinrich Heine, Jewish-German poet:
    – “Communism, though little discussed now and loitering in hidden garrets on miserable straw pallets, is the dark hero destined for a great, if temporary, role in the modern tragedy…It would be war, the ghastliest war of destruction …. The second act is the European and the World Revolution, the great duel between the destitute and the aristocracy of wealth; and that there will be no mention of either nationality or religion; there will be only one fatherland , the globe, and only one faith , that in happiness on earth . . . How could the drama end? … I do not know ; but I think that eventually the great sea serpent [Britain ] will have its head crushed and the skin of the Northern bear [Russia] will be pulled over its ears. There may be only one flock and one shepherd—one free shepherd with an iron staff, and a shorn-alike, bleating-alike human herd! . . .
    ” . . . The Gods are veiling their faces in pity on the children of man , their long-time charges, and perhaps over their own fate. The future smells of Russian leather, blood , godlessness and many whippings. I should advise our grand-children to be born with very thick skins on their backs. … Communism has a language which every people can understand – it’s elements are hunger, envy and death.”

    [MORE]

    Rabbi Abe Finkelstein, interview, “Is Communism Jewish?”:
    Q: I like to ask you this question before we get off the air. We’ve got about two minutes. A point blank question: Is communism Jewish?:
    Rabbi: Of course! Karl Marx, Moses Mordechai Levi, who had a couple of grandfathers that were Jewish, he was the one who created it, along with Engels. He was another nice Jewish boy. And we implemented it and got that started in Russia. It was the great [unintelligible, like “fill” or “bill”] of goods to sell to masses. We tell them: hey, you are here at the bottom. How would you like to be equal, everybody be equal? They thought they were gonna come up, but we brought the rich ones down to their level and we took all the money, and we run it, and they are all a bunch of schleppers. And we make the shekels, and we are the masters of the world, and all the goyim are just human cattle.”

    Le Droit de Vivre, the French Jewish newspaper wrote on May 13, 1933:
    – “Judaism is the father of Marxism and Communism.”

    Hilary Cotter, author of Cardinal Minszenty, “The Truth About His Real Crime”, p. 6:
    – “Communism and Judaism are one and the same.”

    Lev Isaakovich Shestov [Schwartzman], Jewish Russian communist philosopher know for his famous ‘philosophy of despair’, “Apotheosis of groundlessness”:
    “Let future generations turn away from us in horror, let history brand our names as the names of the traitors of universal human values, we will still compose hymns to ugliness and disgust, destruction, madness, chaos and darkness. And after that – we could care less if grass grows.”

    Rabbi Harry Waton, “A Program for the Jews and Humanity”, pp. 143-144, 1939:
    – “But the Communist soul is the soul of Judaism. Hence it follows that, just as in the Russian revolution the triumph of Communism was the triumph of Judaism, so also in the triumph of fascism will triumph Judaism.”
    – “Jews welcome this revolution in the Christian world, and the Jews should show an example. It is not an accident that Judaism gave birth to Marxism, and it is not an accident that the Jews readily took up Marxism: all this was in perfect accord with the progress of Judaism and the Jews.”
    – “It is not an accident that Judaism gave birth to Marxism and it is not an accident that the jews readily took up Marxism; all this was in perfect accord with the progress of Judaism and the jews. The jews should realize that Jehovah no longer dwells in Heaven, but he dwells in us right here on earth; we must no longer look up to Jehovah as above us and outside us, but we must see him right within us [pag.148]. … Since the jews are the highest and most cultured people on earth, the jews have the right to subordinate to themselves the rest of mankind and to be masters over the whole earth. Now, indeed, this is the historic destiny of the jews [pag,99]. … Judaism is communism, internationalism, the Universal Brotherhood of Man, the emancipation of the working class and the human society. It is with these spiritual weapons that the jews will conquer the world and the human race.”[pag.100]

    Rabbi Harry Waton, “A Program For The Jews and Humanity”, 1939:
    – “Fascism must achieve the unification of Europe and the destruction of the sovereign, independent State. Fascism is the extreme and violent organized opposition to Christianity, and for this very reason it will force the adoption of the intention of Christianity, not merely in idea, but also in practice. This will mean the disappearance of dualism, the end of class society, and the beginning of the planned and practical progress towards the achievement of an universal community of humanity…It is the hidden penetration of the Jewish spirit into the Gentile mind that is the danger; and it is a danger because the ‘Aryan’ mind cannot resist it, but must succumb. The task is to extirpate the influence of the pagan tradition. Europe will be false to itself that it will create a universal communism, which will destroy blood and race as the basis of civilization, destroy the beauties and the heroisms of the struggle for power, deny the natural superiority of the white race, and of German in particular, and produce universal equality and brotherhood. The jewish spirit is not merely under the illusion of these ideas; it is the force, in the world, which creates them in idea and compels the rest of humanity to achieve them in practice. I need for no greater consciousness, which is Christianity. It is the inevitable destiny of fascism to create what it intends to prevent – the socialist commonwealth of the world. The aim of Judaism is to realize this inevitable human society resting on universal communism.” [its communist but based more on the porinciples of fascism, since its wealthy jews who buy politicians and hence control governments]

    Trotsky, 1917, from the memoirs of Aron Simanovich, quoted in Vladimir Stepin’s “The Nature of Zionism”, 1993, and translated from Russian into English by Clive Lindhurst:
    – “We must turn Russia into a desert populated by white negroes upon whom we shall impose a tyranny such as the most terrible Eastern despots never dreamt of. The only difference is that this will be a left-wing tyranny, not a right-wing tyranny. It will be a red tyranny and not a white one. We mean the word ‘red’ literally, because we shall shed such floods of blood as will make all the human losses suffered in the capitalist wars pale by comparison. The biggest bankers across the ocean will work in the closest possible contact with us. If we win the revolution, we shall establish the power of Zionism upon the wreckage of the revolution’s funeral, and we shall become a power before which the world will sink to its knees. We shall show what real power is. By means of terror and bloodbaths, we shall reduce Russian intelligentsia to a state of complete stupefaction and idiocy and to an animal existence.”

    Leon Trotzky [Bronstein], “Bolshevism and World Peace”, 1918:
    – “The task of the proletariat is to create a still more powerful fatherland with a far greater power of resistance, the Republican United States of Europe, as the foundation of the United States of the World.” [republics are inspired on Plato’s “The Republica”, a dictatorship…so is ‘democracy’]

    Stalin, “Leninism”, 1933:
    – “The victory of socialism in one country is not an end in itself; it must be looked upon as a support, as a means for hastening the proletarian victory in every other land. For the victory of the revolution in one country [in Russia, for the nonce]…is likely the beginnings and the continuation of the world revolution. In other words, the Communist juggernaut, not content with having trampled Russia and numerous satellite countries under its heel, envisages nothing less than world conquest.”

    Foster Bailey, Freemason, theosophist and husband of Alice Bailey:
    – “Hierarchy”, a supernatural group of ascended masters and spirit guides whose mission is to direct human evolution, also approved of the Chinese Cultural Revolution; “The cultural revolution in China…. is an hierarchical project. Amazing changes have been achieved….”

    Pierre Trotignon, Marxist philosopher, “Art the Barricades”, Encounter, Aug, 1968:
    – “We reject the world, we are no longer even ‘traitors’, since this would imply an affinity with what we are betraying. We are the Viet Cong of thought. … The philosophy of tomorrow will be a terrorist: not a philosophy of terrorism but a terrorist philosophy allied with an active policy of terrorism.”

    M. Cohen, “Services of Jewry to the Working Class”, Kommunist, Kharkov, 12th April, 1919:
    – “The great Russian revolution was indeed accomplished by the hands of the jews. … The symbol of jewry has become the symbol of the russian proletariad, which can be seen in the fact of the adoption of the five-pointed star , which in former times was the symbol of Zionism and Judaism.”

    The Jewish Chronicle, April 4th, 1919
    – “There is much in the fact of bolshevism itself, in the fact that so many jews are bolsheviks, in the fact that the ideals of Bolshevism at many points are consonant with the finest ideals of Judaism.”

    David Ben-Gurion, Israel former prime minister, in America Spectator article “Whose Country Is It”, January 1998:
    – “I am in favour of Bolshevism.”

    The Jewish Chronicle, September 22th, 1922:
    – “The Bolshevik officials of Russia are jews. The Russian revolution with all it’s ghastly horrors was a Jewish movement.”

    The Maccabean, New York, 1905:
    – “The revolution in Russia is a Jewish revolution.”

    The Jewish Transcript:, May 29th, 1936:
    – “The communists are jewish controlled.”

    The American Hebrew, September 10, 1920:
    – “The Bolshevik revolution in Russia was the work of Jewish brains, of Jewish dissatisfaction, of Jewish planning, whose goal is to create a new order in the world. What was performed in so excellent a way in Russia, thanks to Jewish brains, and because of Jewish dissatisfaction and by Jewish planning, shall also, through the same Jewish mental and physical forces, become a reality all over the world.”

    Dr. Oscar Levy, Jewish scholar:
    – “Jewish elements provide the driving force for both capitalism and communism.”

    Encyclopedia Judaica, pag 792:
    – “The Communist movement and ideology played an important part in Jewish life, particularly in the 1920’s, 1930’s, and during and after World War II … Individual Jews played an important role in the early stages of Bolshevism and the Soviet regime…The great attraction of communism among Russian, and later also, Western, Jewry emerged only with the establishment of the Soviet regime in Russia. Many Jews the world over therefore regarded the Soviet concept of the solution to the “Jewish question” as an intrinsically positive approach…Communism and support of the Soviet Union thus seemed to many Jews to be the only alternative, and Communist trends became widespread in virtually all Jewish communities. In some countries Jews became the leading element in the legal and illegal Communist parties and in some cases were even instructed by the Communist international to change their Jewish-sounding names and pose as non-Jews, in order not to confirm right-wing propaganda that presented Communism as an alien, Jewish conspiracy.”

    Jewish Encyclopedia:
    – “Jews have been active in the US in all radical movements, socialist and communist, all left and new, on almost every campus where the new left was active; Jews were prominent in the leadership; typically they form a third to more than half the leadership and members. Jews also dominate the American civil liberties…”

    Henry Ford, “The International Jew”:
    – Communism all over the world, not in russia only, is jewish.”

    Rabbi Stephen Wise, New York:
    – “Some call it Marxism, I call it Judaism.”

    Reinhold Niebur, speech before the Jewish Institute of Religion, New York, 1934:
    – “Marxism is the modern form of jewish prophecy.”

    Otto Weininger, “sex and character” pag. 413:
    – “The jew is an inborn communist.”

    *******
    Like these, I’ve got a lot more if you need!!!!

    • Replies: @soll
  210. @cohen

    Evalion made quite a splash with her videos 3 or 4 years ago (evidently, other people, professionals, made them all, she simply couldn’t have known how to do it). These were hilarious rants against Jews, feminism, gays, blacks, Muslims ….

    She was banned from YouTube & most other platforms (including archive), but some of them survived, at least in parts, somewhere on the Web.

    The vid- which is a bit modified, I have it downloaded in its original form- is here:

    https://www.goyimtv.tv/v/1306534343/How-To-Identify-A-Jew

    • Replies: @Cohen
  211. soll says:
    @Luís Rodrigues-Coelho

    Luís Rodrigues-Coelho says:
    “Really? Funny, many Jews and Jewish sources confirmed what Solznhenitsyn wrote: Letter from Bernard Baruch to Karl Marx, 1888: […]”

    Karl Marx died in 1883, when Bernard Baruch was 13 years old. Whatever source you are citing is obviously fake.

    • Replies: @annamaria
  212. Dube says:

    Here’s a review of a 2017 version of Solzhenitsyn:

    https://www.jewsandpolesdatabase.org/2019/11/04/censored-writer-solzhenitsyn-on-jews/

    The Crucifixion of Russia: A New English Translation of Solzhenitsyn’s 200 Years Together A History of the Russians and the Jews, by Columbus Falco. 2017. Privately Printed, San Bernardino.

    • Thanks: mark green
    • Replies: @Arthur MacBride
  213. JWalters says:
    @Robert Dolan

    I agree this is an excellent video. In support of Tony Martin’s point, here is a statement by Jewish, Israeli Talmud scholar Israel Shahak, from his book, available free on the web.
    “Jewish History, Jewish Religion: The Weight of Three Thousand Years”
    https://ifamericansknew.org/cur_sit/shahak.html

    The quote directly supports Martin’s claims.

    “The apparent enthusiasm displayed by American rabbis or by the Jewish organizations in the USA during the 1950s and the 1960s in support of the Blacks in the South, was motivated only by considerations of Jewish self-interest, just as was the communist support for the same Blacks. Its purpose in both cases was to try to capture the Black community politically, in the Jewish case to an unthinking support of Israeli policies in the Middle East.”

    Two other quotes are directly related.

    “Any support of human rights in general by a Jew which does not include the support of human rights of non-Jews whose rights are being violated by the ‘Jewish state’ is as deceitful as the support of human rights by a Stalinist.”

    “Although the struggle against antisemitism (and of all other forms of racism) should never cease, the struggle against Jewish chauvinism and exclusivism, which must include a critique of classical Judaism, is now of equal or greater importance.”

    My point was a tactical one. In discussing the plot of the Jewish financiers and their courtiers it is useful to MENTION that there are SOME Jews who are also battling against those financiers and their injustices. (Israel Shahak, Norman Finklestein, Max Blumenthal, Aaron Mate, Phil Weiss, Moam Chomsky are examples of Jews who have made SIGNIFICANT contributions to this battle.) Tony Martin acknowledges this in the video. That acknowledgement will help some people accept the points we are making. Thus, it will help move the front line forward.

  214. JWalters says:
    @Franklin Ryckaert

    True for now. But please see my reply to Robert Dolan (144)

  215. JWalters says:
    @Schuetze

    I agree about the rough proportions of Jews with Zionist versus anti-Zionist beliefs. But please see my reply to Robert Dolan (144).

  216. Anonymous[179] • Disclaimer says:
    @Bardon Kaldian

    In Prof Suttons work, Wallstreet and Bolshevism, he mentions Schiff and Kamenka financing Kerensky.

    Many popular leaders (from the Atlantic countries to Russia) at the time did say there was a Jew conspiracy. A document to the state department did note there was a Jewish internationalist conspiracy.

    At the end though, Sutton mentions there is no proof of a internationalist Jewish conspiracy for Bolshevism.
    His conclusion would allow the book to be printed for politically correct reasons considering who owns the press.

    What the book does include though is the names of who travelled from outside into Russia by train (all names mentioned were Jewish and members of either Bolshevik or Menshevik factions). They came prepared.
    Clearly Jews have a revolutionary spirit and at least some organization would be required.

    • Replies: @anon
  217. Cohen says:
    @Bardon Kaldian

    Thank you so much. The bullies (or so called victims) should be dealt head on. Challenge their lies and make them disappear. Here is an example from the movie the Untouchable.

    I hope the young woman did not give up after being taken out from YOUTUBE and hopefully started on Bitchute before the site is bought out by some Zionist billionaire.

    I am waiting to hear from my friend Colin Wright. If you run into him please give him regards.

    • Replies: @Franklin Ryckaert
  218. @Cohen

    The lady did indeed move to Bitchute. Simply google: “Evalion Bitchute”, and you’ll find all her videos.

    • Replies: @cohen
  219. @Dube

    Thanks.
    It’s interesting that the review’s appeal for Jews to “accept collective liability for Communism and its crimes” was answered by R.I. Cohen et al. in 2010
    ” … an exotic rarity …”

    https://www.jewsandpolesdatabase.org/2019/11/04/zydokomuna-rare-collective-liability-accepted-cohen/

    I also searched for Falco’s book, without success …
    Did find this vdo, same title —

    https://archive.org/details/BitChute-4oSnGxIhQDwE

    • Replies: @Dube
  220. anon[399] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anonymous

    Clearly Jews have a revolutionary spirit….

    where is this “revolutionary spirit” in israel?

    seems to be limited to stirring up shit in other people’s countries

    • LOL: Zarathustra
  221. I’m not nearly informed enough to have strong views on this, so I’ll just say that this is an excellent essay. Thanks!

  222. Mikhail says: • Website
    @Schuetze

    I really enjoyed this comment by John Ernest Hodgson, a British war correspondent with Denikin’s forces, said the following of Denikin’s and his officers’ antisemitism

    Inaccurate over-simplifications. From someone (Lehovich) with a more sympathetic but realistic view of Denikin and the Whites:

    • Replies: @Arthur MacBride
  223. @Mikhail

    Another worthwhile account of this conflict is Gen. P. N. Wrangel.

    “Always with Honor”

    Good discussions of Denikin’s strategy, role of Cossacks, Allies/”Allies” etc.

    I have kindle, but available free on archive.

    https://archive.org/details/always-with-honor-by-pyotr-wrangel-z-lib.org

  224. annamaria says:
    @soll

    “The promise of the Talmud will be fulfilled that when the time of the Messiah has come, the jews will have the goods of all peoples of the world in their possession.”
    — Is this also fake?

    Or this – Trotsky:

    We must turn Russia into a desert populated by white negroes upon whom we shall impose a tyranny such as the most terrible Eastern despots never dreamt of. … By means of terror and bloodbaths, we shall reduce the Russian intelligentsia to a state of complete stupefaction and idiocy and to an animal existence.

    And they did. The Jewish Bolsheviks were the bloodiest lot. The zionized western media of all kinds is saturated with the non-stop whining of holobiz survivors while the same media is mum about Jewish crimes in Russia. The true survivors are Russians, Ukrainians, Kazakhs, Georgians, Belorussians, and other ethnic groups of the former Russian empire, which suffered the utmost sadistic and genocidal policies of Jewish Bolsheviks.

    Your Lazar Kaganovich (see Holodomor), Phillip Goloscheyokin (Shaya Itsikovich, see the genocide of Kazakhs), Naftali Frankel (see GULAG), Trotsky (Bronstein, an obnoxious sadistic pet of the sanctimonious warmonger Jakob Schiff), Zemlyachka (Zalkind, see Crimea massacre), Kamenev, Zinoviev, Isai Berg (the inventor and practitioner of gas-vans), and such were Jewish mega-criminals. It is because these Jewish crimes were not exposed and condemned that the world witnesses the ongoing mass-slaughter in the Middle East, all according to the subhuman Oded Yinon Plan for Eretz Israel.

    • Replies: @anon
  225. Wars work!
    Isn’t the same plan being followed since WWII ?

    https://www.timesofisrael.com/on-passover-2021-iraqs-jewish-community-dwindles-to-fewer-than-five/

    ‘At 38, Nassim told AFP he left Baghdad to finally live “a normal life” and get married, as the only remaining Jewish women in the city of millions of people were two elderly ladies.

    (…)

    Israel, on the other hand, is now home to 219,000 Jews of Iraqi origin.’

    • Replies: @annamaria
  226. HdC says:
    @lloyd

    I read about this tale perhaps 50 or 60 years ago. I do recall from this story that the German ambassador assured his French contacts (in so many words) that Dreyfus was NOT a German spy.

  227. anon[877] • Disclaimer says:
    @annamaria

    Anna Maria your comments are inspiring

    someone gets it

  228. annamaria says:
    @Another Polish Perspective

    Is this why this Jewish woman has been so sadistically cruel to Iraqis?
    https://www.rt.com/usa/519407-albright-role-model-blinken/

    Albright later criticized Stahl’s interview, claiming she unwittingly fell into a trap planted by the journalist and did not mean to suggest that Iraqi children are dispensable. However, the backlash she faced following the segment did not appear to influence her views on the issue of sanctions. Asked at an event in Charlottesville in 2012 about the US sanctions on Iran, Albright outright rejected the parallel with Iraq, saying they were “absolutely not the same.”

    Albright was also one of the most outspoken champions of the 1999 US-led NATO bombing of Yugoslavia, over alleged atrocities against ethnic Albanians in Kosovo.

    They see Amaleks everywhere. They swim in the blood of the innocent.

  229. Anonymous[236] • Disclaimer says:

    I just started a PDF english translation in recent days. Works well with Books and iBook on iPad. http://www.renegadetribune.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/Solzhenitsyn-200-Years-Together-Encrypted.pdf

  230. Realhistory says: • Website
    @Colin Wright

    And how many people who read this thread would be willing to fund the purchase of the rights to this book, pay for its translation into English and then publication ? I think I know the answer as so many of you on here do.

    Till we are prepared to properly finance such undertakings we will get no-where.

    We each need to ask “What have I done for the cause today ? To quote a famous German politician “It is not enough to say I believe, you need to say I fight !”

  231. Anonymous[401] • Disclaimer says:

    Solzhenitsyn…Since his death in 2008

    Well…13 years is a long time NOT to translate such an important work.

    What’s the hold-up?

    Why doesn’t Putin publish an English version?

  232. @gotmituns

    When you walk through life as a hammer, everything begins to resemble a nail.

  233. Johan says:

    The dream of the Jews is to have democracy everywhere, as democracy breeds decline in all areas. Democracy is easy to subvert by those who are superior in intelligence, and those who have an active spirit.
    The craze of equality in democracies leads to the destruction of traditional structures where the intelligent are bred, where great talents find fertile soil, structures where competent men are raised.
    The craze of equality which is typical of US culture, and which has been exported to Europe and beyond has become so destructive that all people are dumbed down, and the intelligent and competent pushed into the margins. In a democracy where everyone is equal, armies of fools overshout everything, the media becomes all dominant, as everyone is supposedly equal, no man is considered to be an authority, mediocrity and the opinion of the average dumb public becomes the authority.

    The Jews have even founded the places where the dumb Western democratic gentiles are gathered, where they get their information and where they entertain themselves, Facebook, Youtube, Google, Twitter. Even the Western press quotes from the expressions of the masses in these systems. Gathering the dumb Western democratic masses by means of the technology of Western gentile man in places which they control them was an absolutely brilliant move.

    The Jews, maintaining themselves spheres of intelligence and breeding and employing of talent, being a minority have taken over the US and the West in general because the latter have themselves about completely walked the path of destruction.

    Nature is hierarchical, the Jews are the only sign of intelligence and talent in the West, they win because democracy and equality is against nature, and where it comes into being, the peoples and their cultures are in a state of rapid decline, to the point of mass debilitation. Incompetent Western democratic politicians also have no grand vision, as such Jews have taken over vision, they control the vision of the future for Western man through the tech agenda. The Jews are very imaginative, while Western man is obsessed with petty facts and so called ‘truth’. The Jews know how to sell imaginative vision, while Western democratic man crawls over the ground like a pig, equalizing everything, looking for petty facts and truths.

    The Western world, modern democratic secular man being a rebel gets what he deserves. Especially the US, exporter of a debilitated culture gets what it deserves. No democratic right wing of indignated democratic fools will stop it.

    Basically, if, as a culture you do not nourish your best and superior men and the structures which breeds them, if you insist on equality and your stupid press, you become governed hierarchically anyway by those who are superior. And the monster which you have created yourself, the democratic press, turns against you. In fact, all the monsters which the US has created, including its debilitated consumerist and materialist culture are now intelligently utilized.

    First democracy and equality, demagogy, then tyranny. You should know your classics..

    • Thanks: mark green
Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Spencer J. Quinn Comments via RSS
PastClassics
The Shaping Event of Our Modern World
Becker update V1.3.2