The Unz Review: An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 James Kirkpatrick Archive
So Cruz Hearing Exposed Dem Support for Antifa—But Where Is Trump's DOJ Crackdown?
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

Well, Senator Ted Cruz’s August 4 Senate hearings on Antifa terrorism were at least a start. But Cruz’s apparent strategy of exposing Antifa and expecting elite journalists to explode in outrage is a failure. These journalists know exactly what the group is doing—and support it. The Trump Department of Justice needs to actually use state power to break up Antifa networks and arrest those committing crimes. As of now, the “authoritarian” Trump Administration has used far more force against its own supporters than it ever has against those whose stated goal is to destroy the country.

Cruz’s hearing didn’t lack for dramatic rhetoric. “This shouldn’t be complicated: peaceful protests must be protected,” the senator said. “Riots must be stopped” [FBI has opened 300 ‘domestic terror’ investigations as a result of riots, attorney tells Capitol hearing on Antifa, by Marisa Schultz and Adam Shaw, Fox News, August 5, 2020].

Still, Cruz took a defensive tone throughout. The riots were bad because they had “hijacked” protests from those “who took the street because their hearts cried out for justice” [Here’s What You Missed From The Congressional Antifa Hearing, by Samantha Renck, Daily Caller, August 5, 2020]. He appealed to the memory of flawed Leftist icons Mahatma Gandhi and Martin Luther King Jr. He also said the “rioters aren’t concerned about racial justice” but are “racist” themselves because they “destroy minority communities” and “minority businesses and minority lives across this country.”

Of course, Senator Cruz isn’t wrong with that last point. Mobs have destroyed minority businesses in many cities. Nonwhites are the ones paying most of the price from increased crime [Michael Tracey: Minority business suffering in Minneapolis following rioting after George Floyd’s death, by Michael Tracey, Fox News, July 8, 2020].

But it shows the senator’s acceptance of the Left’s moral frame and the American Right’s need to hide behind nonwhite mascots. Antifa may be extreme and a lot of them may be white, but it doesn’t follow that they don’t sincerely oppose “racism” as they define it. They just think nonwhite casualties are collateral damage, much like how John Brown began his infamous raid by shooting a free black man in the back [Was John Brown’s 1st Victim Black, by Henry Louis Gates Jr., The Root, December 16, 2013].

Incidentally, unknown protesters, presumably Brown’s ideological descendants, recently smeared a monument to that black man with feces [VILE: Harpers Ferry Monument to Free Black Man Killed By John Brown’s Raid Vandalized With What Appears to Be Feces, by Cassandra Fairbanks, Gateway Pundit, July 21, 2020].

Antifa’s methods and goals are not a mystery. The group is quite open about it. In the hearing, The Center of Security Policy’s Kyle Shideler accurately described them as an

anarcho-communist movement whose goal is to use physical violence and intimidation to terrorize American citizens to disengage them from the political process.

CSP’s Shideler argued that Antifa define the entire American political system as “fascist.” To prove this, all we have to do is look at the flag burnings, condemnations of “ameriKKKa,” and the direct threat in Mark Bray’s Antifa: The Anti-Fascist Handbook about making it “politically, socially, economically, and sometimes physically costly” for political opponents to articulate their beliefs, with the goal that “in twenty years those who voted for Trump are too uncomfortable to share that fact in public” [Portland Protesters Burn Bibles, American Flag Outside Federal Courthouse, by Andrea Morris, CBN News, August 2, 2020].

Shideler also made the critical point that Antifa is structured in a hierarchical way and relies on a vast system of “support organizations,” including the Democratic Socialists of America, The International Workers of the World, Refuse Fascism, and the National Lawyers Guild,” among others [Shideler testifies before Senate Subcommittee on the Constitution, Center for Security Policy, August 4, 2020].

This is important because any serious attempt to stop these riots would involve breaking up these criminal conspiracies.

Yet this probably won’t happen. Andy Ngo urged the government to take action but inadvertently provided reasons why it won’t.

“Antifa has mastered the art of making its violence appear innocuous,” he testified. “For example, projectiles that look like water balloons can be filled with chemicals; small slingshots can be used to project rocks, glass, and ball bearings into police lines; umbrella tips can be fastened with discrete pocket knives; powerful handheld lasers can cause serious damage to the eyes.” (Indeed, acting Secretary of Homeland Security Ken Cuccinelli testified that 113 out of the 277 injuries federal officers suffered in Portland involved eye injuries, many caused by industrial lasers.)

[Andy Ngo’s Testimony Implicates ‘Peaceful Protesters’ in Antifa Violence, by Tyler O’Neil, PJMedia, August 4, 2020]

This innocuous appearance allows sympathetic journalists and politicians to pretend that there is no actual violent Leftist group or that people are just being overly idealistic.

They do this anyway even when there is no room for doubt. For example, The New Yorker has run a sob story about lawyers Urooj Rahman and Colinford Mattis, respectively an immigrant and the son of immigrants. The former allegedly threw a Molotov cocktail while the latter allegedly drove the getaway car. In journospeak, this could mean they are “civil-rights heroes, even martyrs” or, at worst, “professionals who crossed a line” [The Making of a Molotov Cocktail, by Lisa Miller, Intelligencer, August 4, 2020].

During the Antifa hearing, Hawaii Senator Mazie Hirono, an immigrant whose commitment to Anglo-American legal norms is notoriously questionable, proclaimed that “we all agree” that “violent extremism of all stripes” is deplorable. But she also smeared the Center for Security Policy because it has been named a “Hate Group” by the Southern Poverty Law Center (who hasn’t been?) [Controversial witnesses testify at Senate Judiciary hearing on protests, by Jinitzail Hernandez, Roll Call, August 5, 2020].

And when challenged by Ted Cruz to denounce Antifa specifically, Hirono simply walked out of the hearing [‘You’re Welcome To Say Something Negative About Antifa Right Now’: Ted Cruz Spars With Mazie Hirono At Senate Hearing, by Scott Morefield, Daily Caller, August 4, 2020].

In fact, of course, this is the behavior of a winner. She simply refused to accept Cruz’s framing of the issue.

ORDER IT NOW

The Dallas Morning News, one of Ted Cruz’s home state newspapers, slammed the senator for saying that Democrats are arguing for “abolishing the police.” Perhaps Senator Cruz was too sweeping in his claim. However, this is no longer a fringe, unthinkable position on the Left. Even the writer conceded that Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez really does want to defund the police [Echoing Trump, Ted Cruz falsely claims “the Democrats are arguing for abolishing the police,” by Todd Gillman, The Dallas Morning News, August 5, 2020].

The New York Times recently provided a platform for another Leftist activist to clarify the issue: the movement really does want to outright abolish the police because “reform won’t happen” [NY Times op-ed clears up ‘Defund the police confusion: ‘Yes, we mean literally abolish the police,’ by Joseph Wulfsohn, Fox News, June 13, 2020].

In another example, The Intercept’s Natasha Lennard called the Cruz hearing a “farce,” but casually concluded Democrats should have supported the “serious and reasonable demand to defund the police at the center of the protests” [Ted Cruz’s Hearing on Anarchist Protest Violence Was a Total Farce, August 5, 2020].

It’s worth noting that The Intercept’s Lennard also praised Antifa for taking down the Alt Right in 2018. Of course, it wasn’t Antifa but government action, including by the Trump Administration, that gutted the movement. This includes the unequal justice levied against Unite The Right protesters, the Rise Against Movement, and the Proud Boys. (Ted Cruz himself sanctimoniously referred to the ostentatiously multiracial Proud Boys as “bigoted idiots” in a recent video [A Portal Into the Progressive Mind ft. Eric Weinstein | Ep. 39, Jul 23, 2020]).

And this illustrates why this hearing was still empty spectacle. If people wonder why ordinary Americans aren’t defending monuments, the flag, or police, it’s because we know that “conservatives” like Cruz will be only too happy to throw us in prison so they can get back to the important work of passing tax cuts for Woke Capital.

Before the hearing, Ted Cruz said that the United States was suffering from “organized terror attacks” [Cruz, ahead of Antifa hearing, describes riots in US cities as ‘organized terror attacks,’ by Adam Shaw, Fox News, August 4, 2020]. If he really believed such rhetoric, this would warrant drastic action. If President Trump and Attorney General Barr wanted to, the Department of Justice could easily unravel these groups, whose organization, membership, and tactics are fairly well known.

But, instead, we have nothing.

Which is particularly frustrating because this chaos could be ended almost instantly. When local police finally had enough (perhaps when a turba descended on the woke Mayor’s house) and broke up the “autonomous zone” in Seattle, it was the work of a few moments rather than provoking a Paris Commune-type fight to the death.

President Trump could stop this American Cultural Revolution tomorrow. The FBI could destroy the coordinating groups with just a modicum of the energy it spends investigating garage door pulls shaped like nooses. Senator Cruz could propose concrete action rather than whining that Democrats aren’t even bothering to play the lip service game the same way he does.

Yet at this point, it’s no surprise that Republican Congresscritters keep acting the way they do. The only hope is that President Trump, perhaps out of sheer, naked, panicked self-interest, will take a strong hand to turn the tide of an election that the Main Stream Media keeps trumpeting that he is losing [Republicans fear disaster in November, by Olivia Beavers and Juliegrace Brufke, The Hill, August 6, 2020].

If Trump doesn’t, he and other Republicans will learn that Democrats aren’t afraid of using state power against opponents [New York seeks to break up National Rifle Association, alleging financial mismanagement, by Daniel Trotta and David Shepardson, Reuters, August 6, 2020]

James Kirkpatrick [Email him |Tweet him @VDAREJamesK] is a Beltway veteran and a refugee from Conservatism Inc. His latest book is Conservatism Inc.: The Battle for the American Right. Read VDARE.com Editor Peter Brimelow‘s Preface here.

(Republished from VDare by permission of author or representative)
 
Hide 3 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. Anon[295] • Disclaimer says:

    You are quite correct that Hirono won the meta-debate against Cruz. I think the issue of premises are frequently ignored. Even if you win the argument you’ll lose in the long run if you accept the premise. (eg the Democrats are the real racists=Republicans are more consistent liberals.)

    Regarding why the DOJ doesn’t destroy Antifa I think a few issues are at play. Barring Barr having a secret scheme in the works there is no evidence to suggest they will be destroyed. One they have full support of the mainstream media, local governments, and the Democratic party. Second their only institutional opponent the Republican party is wishy washy about doing anything too mean. Really though that pales in comparison to the FBI.

    The FBI exists to regulate political extremism in America. Any extremist group in the US is about 1/4 fed in membership and nearly 1/2 fed in leadership. (See: COINTELPRO and PATCON) Feds are informants who take notes, agent provocateurs who set up entrapment schemes or false flags, and agents of influence. The agents of influence are the most important because they set strategy and thus have the power to misdirect it against the interest of their members.

    Could any organization survive if 1/4 of its members and half of its leaders quit? No. Thus extremist groups in America are actually dependent upon their infiltrators. That is to say the FBI regulates political extremism. If it gets too small then the public isn’t scared. If it gets too big they’re in danger of becoming legitimate. The goal is to keep these groups in the sweet spot of obnoxious, but impotent.

    Republican state Attorneys General should learn from the Democratic playbook and start targeting Antifa supporters in the DSA, IWW, and NLG. After all the feds won’t do it.

  2. …now imagine the justice system receives major ‘reforms’ and all those prisoners released?
    America has been building an army of discontents for many decades now.
    You guys do understand that those on the outside are having nasty little thoughts about roosters coming home and just poetry, really.

  3. KenH says:

    In fact, of course, this is the behavior of a winner. She simply refused to accept Cruz’s framing of the issue.

    While at the same time cuck inc. always uncritically accepts the narratives and premises promulgated by the radical left. Just like with the UtR rally the kosher right accepted the Jewish left wing lies that “Nazis” started attacking peaceful counterprotesters for no darn reason other than sheer hatred and intolerance. Ted Cruz was one of the first to uncritically accept this bogus narrative and condemn the UtR protesters but the American Cuckservative, National Review, and even FOX followed right behind.

    The kosher right can never virtue signal enough to the left.

    And good luck getting the DOJ or FBI to really go gangster on BLM and Antifa. Both are filled with partisan left wing Democrats who are mostly sympathetic with the left wing street scum. But if white nationalists or even just right of center mobs were burning down police precincts, destroying property, attempting to destroy federal court houses and attacking and maiming random people I can guarantee the government response at all levels would have been much swifter and heavy handed than what we’ve seen.

    We now live under a left wing anarcho-tyranny and despite Trump’s bluster he was no idea how to deal with it or is too squeamish to use the level of government power necessary to defeat it.

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All James Kirkpatrick Comments via RSS
PastClassics
The “war hero” candidate buried information about POWs left behind in Vietnam.
Are elite university admissions based on meritocracy and diversity as claimed?
Our Reigning Political Puppets, Dancing to Invisible Strings