The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 Tobias Langdon Archive
Rollock’s Bollocks
Interrogating Anti-Racism and Contemplating the Cargo-Cult of Critique
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

Here’s an astonishing fact: the White mathematician Claude Shannon (1916–2001) contributed more to STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics) than all Blacks who have ever lived. But then so did the Indian mathematician Srinivasa Ramanujan (1887–1920). And the Jewish mathematician Emmy Noether (1882–1935), which is even more astonishing. Jews have always been a tiny minority of the world’s population and men have always dominated mathematics, yet one Jewish woman in a short lifetime outperformed the teeming masses of Africa and the Black-African Diaspora over millennia. Blacks have never mattered in math or any other cognitively demanding field. But Jews have mattered hugely, in both good and bad ways.

Outstanding Black contributions to academia

How can this be so, if we’re all the same under the skin? Well, if we’re all the same under the skin, it can be explained only by some malevolent force suppressing the huge intellectual potential of the Black community. In other words: White racism has held Blacks back. And the left are very happy with that explanation. Of course, on a leftist reading, the Jewish Emmy Noether overcame not just racism but also sexism to make her giant contributions to STEM. And if she overcame a double handicap, you’d expect rather more Black men to have overcome their single handicap and matched or surpassed her achievements. They haven’t. But I have to admit that Blacks have made outstanding contributions in some academic fields. Indeed, the Black female academic Nicola Rollock has done things that I would strongly doubt any reader of the Occidental Observer or Unz Review could match, let alone surpass.

Dr Rollock emitting bollocks
Dr Rollock emitting bollocks

Indeed, Dr Rollock reminds me of Claude Shannon, the White genius whom I mentioned above. When he created the hugely important field of information theory, he taught us how to cram the maximum of data into the minimum of signal. And what has Dr Rollock taught us? She’s taught us how to cram the maximum of pretension into the minimum of words. But few people would be able to apply her teaching. Here, for example, is the title of one of her papers: “The Invisibility of Race: Intersectional reflections on the liminal space of alterity.” Are you not awed by that title? I am. And do you not confess your utter inability to match or surpass it? I do. In particular, I’m awed and humbled by her phrase “the liminal space of alterity.” If you think it’s easy to get so much pretension into so few words, I’d invite you to try it for yourself. “The liminal space of alterity” is a shining example of what I’ll call Rollock’s bollocks — “bollocks” is a crude British term for “nonsense” most famous from its use in the title of the Sex Pistols’ album Never Mind the Bollocks (1977) (it literally means “testicles”).

“Bespoke one-to-one executive coaching”

There’s much more of Rollock’s bollocks in “The Invisibility of Race” itself, which was first published in 2012. Her paper was part of a special “Critical Race Theory” issue of the academic journal Race, Ethnicity & Education and helped Dr Rollock begin a lucrative career being paid large sums of White taxpayers’ money to tell Whites in Britain how evil and oppressive they are. In those days, “Critical Race Theory” (CRT) was little-known to the general public but was already flourishing in British academia. The so-called Conservative government that came into power in 2010 did nothing to reverse its rise. Dr Nicola Rollock has risen with it. She now runs a “consultancy” that sucks in White money to spew hatred of Whites. Here are the details at her website:

Overview of services offered:

  • Speaking engagements including keynote addresses & panel debates
  • Advice on the design & delivery of small scale and national projects
  • Editorial guidance & strategic oversight on draft project reports, research proposals and other documentation
  • Guidance on the design of equality & diversity policies, action plans and objectives
  • Design & delivery of workshops to improve understanding of race, racism & racial justice
  • Research & project management (including delivery focus groups, interviews, surveys, questionnaires)
  • Bespoke one to one executive coaching aimed at improving critical understanding and application of racial justice

Current consultancy:

Dr Rollock holds a number of advisory roles including with the Wellcome Trust, the British Science Association and the Home Affairs’ Select Committee. She is Senior Adviser (Race & Higher Education) to the VC [Vice-Chancellor] of the University of Cambridge and also works closely with a number of schools providing strategic oversight and guidance to their plans to improve the experiences of Black and minority ethnic pupils and staff. (“Consultancy and Research” at Dr Rollock’s website)

Dr Rollock is an “expert” in race and CRT, you see. She has unique insights into the pathologies of Whiteness and understands that the failure of Blacks to achieve their sky-high potential is explained by only one thing: White racism. If you want an example of her expertise, try the opening of that paper “The Invisibility of race: Intersectional reflections on the liminal space of alterity.” And marvel as Dr Rollock soars into the intellectual empyrean, effortlessly deploying words of four, five and even six syllables:

I make use of the Critical Race Theory tool of chronicling (counter-narrative) to help demonstrate the complex, multifaceted and often contradictory ways in which ambitions for race equality often represent lofty organisational ideals within which genuine understanding of racism is lacking. … Drawing on Wynter’s (1992) theorisation of the concept of marginality, Ladson-Billings and Donnor 2008, 373) posit that racialised others occupy a ‘liminal space of alterity’ [alas, it isn’t Rollock’s bollocks after all] that is, a position at the edges of society from which their identities and experiences are constructed. They remain at the margins through acts and frequent reminders from dominant groups that regardless of achievement, qualification or status they are locked in ‘the power dynamic and hierarchical racial structures’ that serve to maintain unequal order in society (Ladson-Billings and Donnor 2008, 372).

Yet Wynter (1992) insists that rather than regarding this space as a site of dismal subjugation, those excluded from the centre can experience a certain profound analytical insight that is ‘beyond the normative boundary of the conception of Self/Other’ (Ladson-Billings and Donnor 2008, 373). In other words, it is precisely from this position in the margins that racialised others are able to acquire not simply an ‘oppositional world-view’ (hooks 1990, 149) but what might be understood as a unique surround vision that is able to recognise and deconstruct the multifaceted contours of Whiteness and therefore advance the broader objectives of the racial justice project. Such an all-encompassing analytic perspective is particularly important to challenge and move beyond the not seeing nature of Whiteness that works to perpetuate a racially inequitable status quo: “One of the most powerful and dangerous aspects of whiteness is that many (possibly the majority) of white people have no awareness of whiteness as a construction, let alone their own role in sustaining and playing out the inequities at the heart of whiteness.” (Gillborn 2005, 9)

While recognising and fully supporting the centrality of liminality to advancing a ‘counter-hegemonic discourse’ (hooks 1990, 149 [the lower-case hooks is not a typo; just another academic race hustler), I seek in this article to provide an extension to these debates by arguing that the very notion of what might be framed as liminality as resistance is wholly context dependent. That is to say, the field in which racialised others are operating, the tools or resources at their disposal, the support mechanisms available to them and the relative power of other actors present within the social space or field fundamentally impacts and brings into awkward tension the extent to which occupying a site in the margins becomes advantageous. As such, the arguments presented are located in an understanding, informed by CRT, that racism operates as normal in everyday life (Delgado and Stefancic 2001; Tate IV 1997) and can, in part, be understood through the various forms of capital — to borrow from Bourdieu — that are positioned as having status and legitimacy within formally sanctioned spaces of, for the purposes of this article, the education system which I am taking in its broadest sense to include the academy. (“The Invisibility of race: Intersectional reflections on the liminal space of alterity,” as published in the “Special issue: Critical race theory in England” of Race, Ethnicity & Education, 15[1], pp 65-84)

If you’re a masochist and want more of Rollock’s bollocks, simply follow the link to her paper. But I must admit that I’m touched by a certain pathos in “The Invisibility of Race.” Like so much work in the humanities, it was written by someone who is desperate to be thought intelligent and insightful, but is gnawed by the soul-sapping knowledge that, in fact, she isn’t intelligent or insightful. Touchingly, Dr Rollock emerges from her cloud of obscurantist ink when she does exactly what Steve Sailer would predict a Black woman like her would do, namely, write about her hair. But she also raises the tantalizing prospect of a fascinating new topic for Black women to endlessly dissect and discuss, namely, their bottoms:

Attending an independent girls’ school, I became embedded in discourses of femininity that were predominantly white and middle class. I was teased to the point of anxious self-consciousness about the shape and size of my bottom; my skirt not so much as A-line as awkward pencil-cut thanks to my derriere. Hair was also a subject of white curiosity. How often did I wash it? How long did it take to style and in moments that struck an as yet unanalysed peril in my heart, could they touch it? While white girls flicked their hair or dried it in seconds under the dryer when we went swimming, I and the other Black girls attempted to restore ours to some natural order before, the job yet incomplete, being barked back into hurried lines by impatient gym teachers. (“The Invisibility of race: Intersectional reflections on the liminal space of alterity”)

Yes, there is indeed pathos in that prolix and pretentious paper. But there’s also poison. Dr Nicola Rollock obviously bears deep resentment about how White Britain failed to treat her Black bottom and Black hair with due respect and reverence. And she wants revenge on behalf of her bottom and hair. Critical Race Theory (CRT) is her chosen route to revenge on Whites. I would call CRT a cargo cult, an academic equivalent of the strange religious movements that appeared in Melanesia, Papua New Guinea and other backward regions, particularly during the Second World War. For example, when the American military began to use bases in Melanesia, primitive tribesmen were awed by the sight of large and noisy aircraft landing with lavish cargoes of food, clothing, medicine and other goods. The tribesmen reasoned that, by imitating the appearance and behavior of American soldiers and flight-controllers, they too could conjure such cargoes from the heavens. They dressed in imitation army uniforms, carved rifles and headphones from wood, sat in imitation control-towers and waved imitation signal-paddles on imitation runways. After all, the Americans were obviously using magic and invoking supernatural forces with ritual gestures and costumes, so why couldn’t Melanesians do the same?

A cargo-cult in action: appearance will control reality
A cargo-cult in action: appearance will control reality

Well, they couldn’t do the same because they didn’t understand what they were seeing and they were wrong in their belief that appearance will control reality. Advanced White technology isn’t based on ritual gestures and costumes, but on the acute insight and prolonged effort of White geniuses like Isaac Newton, Joseph Priestley and James Watt, who exposed and explored the hidden world of atoms and the electromagnetic spectrum or learned to master metal, fire and other natural resources. Melanesian tribesmen were millennia behind the Whites who came to their islands. Wooden headphones don’t work and waving signal-paddles on a scraped-out runway in the jungle won’t bring a heavily C-47 Dakota roaring from the sky. But cargo-cults are not confined to obviously backward places like Melanesia and Papua New Guinea. A very similar psychology, accompanied by similarly earnest and ineffectual rituals, is evident in vast swathes of modern academia. When academics like Nicola Rollock explore “the liminal space of alterity,” they’re performing rituals not with paddles but with polysyllables. Primitive tribesmen imitated the American military; Rollock and company are imitating genuine scholars. In neither case does the imitation have any effect: the gestures and costumes don’t summon bounty from the heavens. The tribesmen don’t get cargo and the academics don’t get truth.

Riddled with resentment, ravenous for revenge

But then leftist academics, unlike Melanesian tribesmen, aren’t really sincere in their cult. As I’ve pointed out again and again, leftists do not pursue truth, justice and equality for all races. No, they use lies about Whites to pursue revenge on Whites and the enslavement of Whites. Here are two more high priests in the cargo-cult of anti-racist academia:

In this essential two-part lecture, Dr Kennetta Hammond Perry and Professor Kehinde Andrews will draw on historical fact to demystify the notion that the Western economy owed its bounty to scientific advancements, industry and democracy — and was instead built on violence, slavery and colonialism. (The Guardian at 200: Windrush histories and mythologies of race in Britain, Online workshop at The Guardian, 19th May 2021)

The resentment-riddled and revenge-ravenous Professor Kehinde Andrews on a children’s website at the BBC
The resentment-riddled and revenge-ravenous Professor Kehinde Andrews on a children’s website at the BBC
The resentment-riddled and revenge-ravenous Dr Kennetta Hammond Perry emitting anti-White bollocks at Youtube
The resentment-riddled and revenge-ravenous Dr Kennetta Hammond Perry emitting anti-White bollocks at Youtube

Note the words “essential two-part lecture.” According to the Guardian, it’s essential that Whites in Britain are lectured by two Black cargo-cultists that Whites are innately evil and exploitative, while Blacks and other non-Whites are innately virtuous and vulnerable. Of course, this leftist insistence on the innate evil of Whites and the innate virtue of non-Whites contradicts the leftist insistence on the oneness of humanity. But so what? The cargo-cultists of anti-racism are employing what George Orwell called doublethink, or the “power of holding two contradictory beliefs in one’s mind simultaneously, and accepting both of them.”

Free to soar into the intellectual empyrean

Orwell’s novel Nineteen Eighty-Four (1948) describes how the cargo-cult of Marxism fails to summon anything from Heaven, but very successfully summons a great deal from Hell. It is, after all, much easier to destroy than to create. Black cargo-cultists like Dr Nicola Rollock, Dr Kennetta Hammond Perry and Professor Kehinde Andrews are incapable of creating a civilization, but are working hard to destroy one. But you won’t find posturing, prolix and poisonous Blacks like them in Chinese universities. The cargo-cult of Marxism brought Hell to China in the twentieth century, but China’s famines were not overseen by Jews and Georgians like the famines inflicted by communism on Russians and Ukrainians.

The Chinese are in control of their own destiny and aren’t funding any Chinese-hating cargo-cult of critique. The White West needs to start acting like communist China. We have to end Rollock’s bollocks and send White-hating charlatans like Nicola Rollock where they belong: to Black nations where their bottoms and hair can receive all due respect and reverence. And where their innate genius can soar into the intellectual empyrean, free at last of the cruel chains and whips of White supremacy and White racism.

(Republished from The Occidental Observer by permission of author or representative)
 
Hide 91 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. yawzaa! she genoous. well, she is a brilliant Negro (translation: 105 IQ)

    • Replies: @Richard B
  2. Atle says:

    “And where their innate genius can soar into the intellectual empyrean, free at last of the cruel chains and whips of White supremacy and White racism.”

    At last they can soar into their rightful heavens. Hopefully that will be some distance away.

  3. bert33 says:

    People have been trying to tear down the united states since we opened shop in the 1700’s and we’re still here. The angry social agenda losers in higher ed today would not make it for long at a real jobsite where performance pretty much matters every day. That’s why they make a career out of serially abusing academic venues where they can spray vitriol at 1st year college students who don’t know any better. US higher ed today has pretty much gone to the potty, if you want honest schooling go elsewhere.

    • Replies: @Icy Blast
    , @macilrae
  4. Emmy Noether was a proud Bolshevik and would have supported CRT if she lived today.

    • Replies: @Che Guava
  5. Anon[306] • Disclaimer says:

    Traditionally, the US has been success as an organism because it has, in the Darwinian sense, sucked the good out of its various waves of immigrants that it has engulfed like an amoeba. However, the US has also reached the stage when it is being latched onto by an impressive load of parasites, and its healthy body has become sick.

    An organism can be killed if its parasite load grows too heavy for it to function.

    • Agree: Realist
    • Replies: @taterbug
  6. USA1943 says:

    Why do Whites Pay anything to have some teacher tell them how evil and oppressive they are? Why do they hire her? Why do they attend her class? If they do attend her class, why don’t some kids slit her car tires, an/or put sugar in her gas tank? When I was in junior and senior High School they did these things to unpopular teachers, If she is telling kids they are oppressive and evil solely based on their skin color, Why do the kids or their parents put up with it? She is clearly Instigating and Provoking students by being hostile to them, why put up with that?

  7. Anonymous[290] • Disclaimer says:
    @Atle

    Let me translate:

    racialised others occupy a ‘liminal space of alterity’ [alas, it isn’t Rollock’s bollocks after all] that is, a position at the edges of society from which their identities and experiences are constructed. They remain at the margins through acts and frequent reminders from dominant groups that regardless of achievement, qualification or status they are locked in ‘the power dynamic and hierarchical racial structures’ that serve to maintain unequal order in society (Ladson-Billings and Donnor 2008, 372).

    Yet Wynter (1992) insists that rather than regarding this space as a site of dismal subjugation, those excluded from the centre can experience a certain profound analytical insight that is ‘beyond the normative boundary of the conception of Self/Other’ (Ladson-Billings and Donnor 2008, 373). In other words, it is precisely from this position in the margins that racialised others are able to acquire not simply an ‘oppositional world-view’ (hooks 1990, 149) but what might be understood as a unique surround vision that is able to recognise and deconstruct the multifaceted contours of Whiteness and therefore advance the broader objectives of the racial justice project.

    Different racial groups have different capabilities, dependent on genetics. If you are a member of a genetically limited breeding group group that has very few productive capabilities to offer the surrounding society, and your group membership is easily recognizable, then you and your group will be unable to participate in the surrounding society. This is true even if your group has internal standards that are difficult (but possible) for your group members to meet. Your group will have no interest in maintaining the group in which it is embedded, and that very disinterest will permit your group to say things about the surrounding society that nobody within the surrounding society would say. These things may help to destroy the surrounding society.

    It is my belief that more can be said than Langdon realizes. The “few productive capabilities” group will not want the production of the high productive capabilities group. It wants to displace the high productive capabilities group, and its high production with it. Once you realize that, the idea that a statement such as “logical thinking is necessary for industrial society” is important to a group that cannot participate in industrial society appears foolish. That group does not want to participate in industrial society (since it cannot), it wants that society to vanish, and to populate the vacated land.

    And the academically obfuscated language of Dr. Perry’s paper says exactly what I have said above.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  8. “ere’s an astonishing fact: the White mathematician Claude Shannon (1916–2001) contributed more to STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics) than all Blacks who have ever lived. But then so did the Indian mathematician Srinivasa Ramanujan (1887–1920). And the Jewish mathematician Emmy Noether (1882–1935), which is even more astonishing. Jews have always been a tiny minority of the world’s population and men have always dominated mathematics, yet one Jewish woman in a short lifetime outperformed the teeming masses of Africa and the Black-African Diaspora over millennia. Blacks have never mattered in math or any other cognitively demanding field. But Jews have mattered hugely, in both good and bad ways”

    Green Flag would disagree. Tubby black women make better mechanics than skilled White Men!!!!!

    • Replies: @gotmituns
  9. Anonymous[407] • Disclaimer says:

    Ms. Rollock let slip that she attended a private, fee paying school, hence she was born to wealth and privilege, much greater wealth and privilege than at least 90% of her white British contemporaries.
    Yet now, somehow, she makes a highly lucrative living as a professional bellyacher for the ‘underprivileged’.

    • LOL: JM
  10. ecurb says:

    In the sex pistols trial, with the celebrated author John Mortimer acting for the defence, it was established that bollocks was a phrase used in the Midlands in the 18th century referring to the Guff emanating from the pulpit of the church.

  11. gotmituns says:

    This article is total bs.

    • Troll: Realist
  12. Blacks and other mud creatures believe if academic institutions just give them a degree, they will receive the bounty. This, of course, after they bully professors to pass them in spite of their incompetence. The academic institutions, of course, have been more than happy to oblige, because of the college loan scam; cycle as many suckers through as possible to make money. Kind of like a circus.

    Very soon, planes will fall from the sky, bridges will fail, diseases and injuries will be misdiagnosed, our legal institutions will crumble, and food and energy production will fall. The leftists and mud creatures will drag us back into the primordial jungle. And don’t think, like so many others, that the chinks will take up the slack. Without Whites and their innovations, the slants will fester in stagnation.

    A literal dark age looms. Not many of us are getting out of the next decade alive.

    • Agree: Katrinka
    • Replies: @Anymike
  13. @Anonymous

    highly lucrative living as a professional bellyacher for the ‘underprivileged’.

    Who would’ve thought 30 years ago that pissing and moaning to audiences about the plight of idiots could become a thing? I’d love to watch a debate with this con artist between somebody like Matt Walsh or Ben Shapiro. It’s stunning what we’ve allowed to happen as of late.

  14. I actually downloaded the thing she wrote and read it.

    She seems to spend quite a while at the beginning, using lots of high-falutin words and referencing various learned people and publications, to show that if you were located differently in a society, you would see things differently and might notice things others take for granted.

    So – surprise, surprise – if you were a Swede in Nigeria or China or Mexic0 – you might have a perspective the more mainstream members of society lacked.

    The other thing I noticed about what she wrote is her self-obsession.

    And using fictional characters is deemed to be another legitimate tool – presumably instead of data.

  15. gotmituns says:
    @Eddie The Swarthy Rat Cellar

    Blacks have never mattered in math or any other cognitively demanding field. But Jews have mattered
    —————————————————————————————————–
    The only thing that “matters” to White people now is a good position, proper breathing, bringing the sights to 6 o’clock bull, taking up trigger slack and letting the round go at exactly the right moment – one round, one hit. All the other bs about “intellect” means nothing now.

  16. The traditional intellectual freedom of academia made institutions of higher learning into natural hotbeds of revolutionary activism against capitalism. Neutering one of the most effective sources of opposition through careful dispersal of grant money to easily corruptible useful idiots is a classic survival strategy of the oppressor/owner class.

    That, I daresay, is an actual leftist critique, not the fluffy nonsense of the controlled opposition, who are so very well paid today to, and dare I say this too, distract the masses from the class struggle.

    One thing you can say about the old Reds, they really knew how to turn a phrase. Now, we’ll never know how well their ideas would have worked in a country with a long tradition of civil liberty and democracy, unlike, say, Russia, China, or East Germany.

  17. JM says:
    @USA1943

    Indeed. Why not? Those victims of the past HAD to be FAR better than this crop.

  18. @Anonymous

    It’s the grift of black yuppie brats. It pays better then being a mathematician, and in their minds black enough for the hood.

  19. Che Guava says:
    @RedpilledAF

    I should look it up, but I have no idea of her  contributions.

    Have a vague idea of the Indian man, he is highly esteemed, must read more, have closely studied Shannon’s work.

    Of course, Alan Sokal, and more recently, three apparent left wingers (apparent because they were cowed by the response)successfully published total bollocks to send this whole bs up.

    I take on the challenge, offer a few pretensious four-word combos. One or two reflect reality.

    Supra-liminarity of National Socialism

    Hegel’s Dialectic vs. Materialism

    Antidisestablishmentarianism as Thanatotic Force

    Relativity in General Sociology

    Schroedinger’s Cat, or Kitten?

    Concentrated Information Resembles Noise

    • Replies: @Anymike
  20. profnasty says:

    “the not seeing nature of Whiteness”.
    Wow. If they could construct a meme on that construct us’d be finished.
    Hope no one ever do.

  21. Anymike says:
    @Jimmy le Blanc

    Conan 2.o? I like to say, people like to think that the orange ball has to always just get bigger and bigger and higher and higher. What is the Green New Deal but a phantasmagoric scheme to replace the orange ball with the green ball, which also will always get bigger and bigger and higher and higher?

    But there are no guarantees and lots of possible reasons. Come back in a thousand years and it might be worldwide feudalism and warlord rule. For many people in this world, this might be the preferred outcome.

    Even if it means shorter lifespans, limited to no education, extremely limited to no social mobility, a limited material life and never in your life being more five miles from where you were born, for most of the human race, this represents the world of the known. They will see it as a small price to pay to get rid of the hated “machine” and a society where the cognitive order and the social order are much the same thing.

    In a feudal order, people can attribute their position as a serf to their unwillingness to learn the military arts and submit themselves to the fortunes of war, or the unwillingness of their forbearers to do the same. It’s a lot easier to cop to being a coward than it is to cop to being dumb. Coward is something you can do something about but won’t. There is no fix for being dumb.

  22. Anymike says:
    @Che Guava

    Don’t make it so complicated. The liminality of alterity means living a dungeon, either figurative or literal, because you’re different.

    • Replies: @Che Guava
    , @Che Guava
  23. usNthem says:

    The vast majority of the lumpen negrotariat are too stupid to realize what a failed branch of humanity they are relative to Whites. However, the “intelligent” (ie AA) set do see it, at least at some level, and they can’t stand it – there has to be a reason other than their innate intellectual inferiority. Thus, everything that blacks have been unable to accomplish throughout history is Whitey’s fault. Unfortunately, too many Whites are apparently happy to support such ludicrous notions as well.

    • Agree: Realist
    • Replies: @do chere
  24. @gotmituns

    It’s a Saturday (shabbat) filler …

  25. Anonymous[322] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anonymous

    Ding ding ding we have a winner!

  26. geokat62 says:
    @gotmituns

    This article is total bs.

    bs = beautiful scripture

    • LOL: mark green
  27. One of the most powerful and dangerous aspects of whiteness is that many (possibly the majority) of white people have no awareness of whiteness as a construction, let alone their own role in sustaining and playing out the inequities at the heart of whiteness.”

    What an incredibly poisonous assertion. Her parents brought her to England from Barbados where she was able to have a fine education. And what does she do with that education? An all out attack and assault of the very country that welcomed them. The analogy in the story is a brilliant one. She could have taken a different directtion with her career but focused solely on creating hate and division.

    Every other commerical in the UK is a Black couple or a Black man with a White woman. This in no way reflects the real demographics of the UK. Even the new Dr. Who is a Black man.

    I do wonder if I will be around to see the day when White people turn and say enough is enough.

    • Agree: CelestiaQuesta
  28. Funny as hell article. Nothing new on offer? This became a dinner course beautifully presented. Neither too much nor too little. There’s appetite all the way to the end.

    I hope you other readers will link this to your friends. We “know” the lies, but here’s the necessary form of magic in telling the tale.

    Whom it is enables these types at the particular institution is the thing to be taken away. Names.
    Think globally, act locally.

  29. I’m almost embarrassed to admit that I was driven to near insanity trying to wrap my head around the concept of self/other. Leftists claim that this is how identity is formed, and there are varying levels of sophistication of the argument, from the pedestrian formulation of “white people are happy no matter how poor they are that at least they aren’t niggers,” to the endlessly resentful Eddie Said Orientalism book length treatment of “wypipo ain’t gotta culcha, day jes do da opposite of we kangz.”

    The obvious absurdity here is that, if you need an other in order to formulate a self, where does the other get his identity? As a young respectable man, I wrote paper after paper of increasingly insane babble trying to square the circle*. It was only after finding Christ that I realized the question itself does not merit reflection, since it does not bring one truth nor happiness. And it was only after finding racism that I knew why the question was ever asked in the first place.

    *The answer to the question is obvious once you understand the extremely parochial and ethnonarcissist philosophies of the people that write about this stuff. In short, we wuz kangz, with beautiful wakanda (or shtetl) communal vibrant culcha, and mercantilist and industrious whites have no culture except as a repudiation of us. To quote Bronze Age Pervert, these people will never forgive the white man for teaching their grandparents to eat with fork and knife.

  30. Seneca44 says:

    Check out the Youtube clip where Artie Lange describes his pitch for a sketch of “Good Will Smith” to MadTV. A precise lampoon of black “academia”

    https://www.youtube.com/shorts/MXq8SHq6l-g

    • Replies: @CelestiaQuesta
  31. Che Guava says:
    @Anymike

    That is depressing, it would be more interesting if, on this thread, you were also challenged to make pretensious four-word combos.

    I could do better than in my post, but why don’t you have a try, too?

  32. Che Guava says:
    @Anymike

    Well said, but four-word bullshit to mock that of Rollock would be fun, at least on this
    site.

  33. This pretender, Nicola Rollock, reminds me of Oswald Bates from the 90’s Black comedy TV show, ‘In Living Color.’ Bates would lecture his fellow Black inmates in prison using sophisticated words and expressions that he did not know the meaning of. Most often, he couldn’t even pronounce them correctly. But boy did he think he was smart! And all the other inmates who were just as dumb or dumber thought he was brilliant. Anyone who had an ounce of sense and real education knew he was a phony – just like Nicola Rollock.

    Those ‘In Living Color’ skits were hysterical because they were true about so many Blacks who discover certain words or expressions used by intelligent Whites, and then employ them without the foggiest notion of what they mean or in what context they should be used. The Oswald Bates skits are still available on YouTube, and you’re guaranteed to get a good laugh out of them.

    I’ve believed for a long time that Blacks are pretenders. When the South African country and government was handed over to Blacks by foolish and guilt-ridden whites in 1994, it was simply another case of Blacks proving how corrupt and incompetent they were for all the world to see. Sure, these same Blacks looked ‘official’ in their suits and military regalia, but they didn’t know how to run a nation with all its complexities than any other low-IQ and low-skilled fool.

    Watching all the pomp and ostentatious display that occurs in the South African parliament with its attention to rules and by-laws, the gullible might think these are people who are smart and committed to order. But they’re not. They’re just pretending. They’re just following the protocols of the White man with a very limited understanding of what’s even about. In my view, Blacks are content with themselves when they’re able to imitate the ways of Whites. The reasons behind it along with a full comprehension are unnecessary and, more likely, unattainable due to their lower intelligence levels.

    Blacks pretend because they cannot perform.

    • Agree: usNthem
  34. I was raised, foolishly, it turns out, never to refer to other groups in terms that might suggest they were less than human.

    But, I don’t know. “Parasites” just seems to fit.

  35. Sometimes cosmic justice works.

    LOW IQ NEGRO ACCIDENTALLY SETS HIMSELF ON FIRE AFTER SETTING COP CAR ON FIRE- MATTSANTOS



    Video Link

  36. Icy Blast says:
    @bert33

    “…we’re still here.” Well, at least for a little while…

  37. Anon[338] • Disclaimer says:

    “I would call CRT a cargo cult, an academic equivalent of the strange religious movements…”
    We need to create a religious movement called Caucasianism, declare a holy land(s), complain endlessly about living in diaspora and the people we encounter in diaspora, create anti-Caucasianism laws, then get mad and offended when others claim this is about race not religion.

    • Replies: @Anymike
  38. Jewish degeneracy a greater evil than tribal Muslim barbarism.

    • Replies: @RockaBoatus
  39. ricpic says:

    “…an oppositional world view…”

    Which you encounter speaking to any black, from street level black to full of himself professional black. It simply means that whatever you, whitey, say, he counters. Automatically and always.

  40. This just breaks my heart seeing all these genius niggaz being analphuced by white GlobalHomo’s. These aspiring gangsta rappaz all deserve sum respec in addition tewz fitty acres an uh mule.
    Just today anutta young aspiring gangsta dun die from lead poisoning while he wuz try’n ta save his little black azz.
    24 year old Gangsta Rappa Lil Keed died, said his brotha Lil Gotit,
    “Can’t believe I seened u die today bro I did all my cries I know what u want me to do and that’s go hard for Mama Daddy Our Brothers Naychur and Whiteboy #ImaHoldthisShitDown,” Lil Keed’s brother, Lil Gotit, posted to Instagram.

    Lil Keed could have invented anutta weed.
    RIP lil Nigga Keed, I be rapping fo yo homies.

    • Replies: @Annony Mouse
  41. @Priss Factor

    That freak of a male nurse and his kind spells the doom of the West. Listen to how he speaks and his inflection. It’s enough to make one vomit. How he speaks and presents himself is nothing more than a perverted gay culture that has been imposed on him. He’s a pretender, but he’s too lost in the sauce to recognize it.

    Just as a side note, whenever a man speaks in this poofter manner with his accompanying lisp, it often arouses anger in heterosexual males and rightly so. In my opinion, this is quite a natural and normal response to the weirdo we’ve encountered. It alarms our internal defense system that in turn provokes us to be revolted against this sort of male who has violated the natural order of things.

    It’s perhaps akin to someone who encounters a land whale weighing 400 or 500 pounds. Our first reaction is to be shocked, and then revulsion sets in. Our internal system signals to us that something has gone horribly wrong.

    The same thing could be said when we encounter a feminist bull-dyke who has an exaggerated mannerism trying to be a male. It immediately rubs us the wrong way because we know it’s not real, and because what she’s doing runs counter to the natural or created order. It’s not just laughable, it’s weird and gross.

    The only kind of person who isn’t repulsed by the flaming homo and America’s freak parade are those who have so severely deadened their conscience that they can’t even recognize when something is innately wrong. You know they’re especially demented when they publicly ‘celebrate’ it too and throw it in the face everyone.

    • Replies: @martin_2
  42. @Priss Factor

    Cue Arthur Brown – Fire

    • Replies: @Richard B
  43. karel says:

    I would call CRT a cargo cult, an academic equivalent of the strange religious movements that appeared in Melanesia, Papua New Guinea and other backward regions, particularly during the Second World War. For example, when the American military began to use bases in Melanesia, primitive tribesmen were awed by the sight of large and noisy aircraft landing with lavish cargoes of food, clothing, medicine and other goods.

    Hmm, I would not be so strict with the Polynesians and CRT crowd. Most of the primitive American and European tribesmen also hold an irrational belief that their governements and ”good”, not the bad ones, oligarchs will bring them unimaginable wealth and properity, if they wait long enough for the goodies to arrive.

    • Replies: @Anon
  44. Realist says:

    Rollocks is definitely the epitome of the black shit slinger. If you visit her Wikipedia site you will see on the right side a panel with one header titled Scientific Career. She never experienced anything resembling a scientific career…none of her studies has a remote likeness to science.

    The photo of Kehinde Andrews shows the deep contempt and seething hatred he has for the White race.

  45. @Seneca44

    Anyone ever have a nigga pretending to be a lawyer going to sue you?

    “Pertaining to the events set for by that which is justifyable, under rules of engagement should therefo be regulated and constewed pretaing to the facts set forth by which all minz are created equal. We duh people lil Gotit, Nuathua Boy, Anal Lyke iz seeing y’all fo \$5 million dollaz or a new house and Cadillac Escalade each whichever is mo.”

    I stand my case.

  46. Realist says:
    @Anonymous

    Ms. Rollock let slip that she attended a private, fee paying school, hence she was born to wealth and privilege, much greater wealth and privilege than at least 90% of her white British contemporaries.

    She is black and was most likely given a full scholarship.

  47. Realist says:

    Excellent article.

  48. Anon[408] • Disclaimer says:

    Blacks invented the Tom Tom drums, the precursor to the internet. They also invented a system of building grass huts without nails or screws. They also discovered a cooking system where the meat is encased in mud and turned over a fire. The flesh comes out tender and moist and was greatly favoured after tribal raids. An old stringy warrior comes out like tender young meat after such a roast.

    Whites need to read Tarzan and look at his movies to appreciate the contributions of black africans to world culture and scientific discovery.

    There is more anti white resentment from blacks in the West than there is black on black in Africa. Thats because the Bros in Africa dont put up with shit from the other tribes.

    Here in the west though, the anti white everything stems from the fact that blacks sense whites are jealous of their inventions and scientific discoveries which changed the course of history.

    Whites need to be more respectful and give blacks more and more to show their appreciation for black accomplishment.

  49. taterbug says:
    @Anon

    The question is how do we foster a symbiotic healthy relationship. I don’t relish the idea of a functioning “Parasite Eliminator Czar”.

  50. Anon[408] • Disclaimer says:
    @karel

    CRT exists in the USA but not shred of it can be found in Africa. Take Zimbabwe for instance. Mugabe was from the Shona tribe and oppressed the Ndebele.

    When the Ndebele came out with their version of CRT, Mugabe sent his North Korean trained goons to correct the situation by any and every means. Things were quickly brought back to order !

    We put up with this shit. Here in the US, 12% of the population, most of whom are in jail, seem to dictate policy. In Africa, the Tribe out of power dictates nothing.

    There must be a moral for whites somewhere and perhaps a solution to the never ending CRT mantra ?

  51. aandrews says:

    “But Jews have mattered hugely, in both good and bad ways.”

    https://www.jpost.com/diaspora/pollard-jews-will-always-have-dual-loyalty-and-should-consider-spying-for-israel-663285

    Pollard suggested that Jews were deluding themselves if they thought of America as a home and suggested he would counsel a young US Jew working in the American security apparatus to spy for Israel.

    “I’d tell him, not doing anything is unacceptable. So simply going home [to Israel] is not acceptable. Making aliyah is not acceptable,” Pollard said. “You have to make a decision whether your concern for Israel and loyalty to Israel and loyalty to your fellow Jews is more important than your life.”

    • Thanks: Orville H. Larson
    • Replies: @Right_On
  52. martin_2 says:
    @RockaBoatus

    Some woman on youtube – Karen Straughan – nailed it wrt explaining your revulsion AFAICS.

    She said that it is normal and appropriate for a girl or woman to spend all her time on make up and fashion and other vanity because ultimately all that really matters in a woman is her ability to have children. She doesn’t really have to be able to DO anything.

    A man OTOH has to be able to do things, has to perform. Sperm is cheap and eggs are expensive, as they say.

    So when a man starts acting like a woman then he is bringing nothing to the table. He can’t have children, but at the same time he’s not doing anything useful. He’s a useless eater.

  53. @gotmituns

    Thank you for your contribution.

    If your article is chosen for publication the Sub-Editor will be in touch shortly.

  54. I’ve reached the point where I see getting upset about blacks as kind of like arguing that the clogged toilet is bad.

    Of course it’s bad. The issue is what are you going to do about it.

    In the meantime, I wouldn’t focus on blacks themselves so much as on those that nurture them, foster them, and permit and encourage them to behave as they do. We all know what to expect from blacks. Nothing new there. The question is who and what led to them becoming the blight and menace they are today.

    It doesn’t have to be this way. To switch analogies, wild pigs in the woods can become a nuisance. Different story if there’s one in your living room; the problem isn’t the pig so much as where he is.

    • Replies: @Here Be Dragon
  55. The real complaint that white leftist liberals(libtards)are making is: why aren’t blacks like us?

  56. do chere says:
    @usNthem

    Slavs are not regarded part of the satanists master pink race but they are ready to blast the pink BS backside to pieces any moment..

  57. macilrae says:
    @bert33

    People have been trying to tear down the united states since we opened shop in the 1700’s and we’re still here.

    I hope you are – but the cultural changes here since I emigrated to California in 1967 are huge. The media and pop industries have reduced at least two subsequent generations to overweight twerking zombies. Foreigners no longer look at traveling Americans (if there are any) with indulgent patronage as they loudly hold forth on the quaintness of this old place. Indeed the foreigners themselves have been twerking for quite a while now – spectacularly led by the British who seem to have no national character left – not an awkward bastard in sight!

  58. @USA1943

    Why indeed. It is because most whites believe in self-sacrifice and faith. Their dominant religion uses a nailed-up body as its symbol, they claim they are born sinners, and they are deeply ashamed of even the sight of their own bodies, which they have outlawed.

    This massive shaming was apparently invented by the Jews, though they may have borrowed it from the Egyptians. The Muslims cover women head to toe.

    That race hustlers have picked up on the shame game is not surprising. It has always been a fundamental technique of power politics. You can usually measure the wickedness of power-lusters by how devoted they are to shaming humanity, especially the human body and its pleasures..

  59. gotmituns says:

    Thank you for your contribution.

    If your article is chosen for publication the Sub-Editor will be in touch shortly.
    —————————————————————————————–
    I hoppe it wasnt two wordie fore you.

  60. Franz says:

    The White West needs to start acting like communist China.

    So we have to go communist for awhile ourselves. You want the effect, you must have the cause.

    The USA will have it the easiest: Just flip what we’re doing now. The care and feeding of billionaires has created a bubble of non-productive wealth just ready to pop. The joy of seeing Bill Gates and Zuckerberg riding tractors. The return to real money, not air.

    But mostly, yes: The squeaky wheel that gets the grease will become the nail sticking out that will get hammered. Ah, joy.

  61. Anymike says:
    @Priss Factor

    If you’re going to be a firebug, at least learn drop and roll. It’s just common sense.

    • Replies: @RestiveUs
    , @Philmuhcrevis
  62. Ungrateful parasites like these are the reason I pray for an economic crash of unprecedented severity irrespective of the impact on me and mine. I’d relish seeing them twist and turn like a slug on a bed of salt. Grrrrr!

  63. Anymike says:
    @Anon

    I’ve ballparked the numbers. With a fleet of about 150 jumbo jets and 20 large cruise ships, it would be possible to send everyone in North America back to where they came from in no more than 20 years. The older people beyond reproductive age could just be withdrawn to coastal enclaves and allowed to peacefully die out, and the virile population would be resettled in Europe, Asia, Africa and Latin America.

    North America would become a reservation, excuse me, forget I said that, a human biodiversity zone per the UN, with the Blue Hats policing the coasts and southern border.

    The surviving Native Americans could live on the provisions left behind (i.e. canned food) while they reestablished their old ways. Man, wolf and bear, all having a deer old time of it and berry nice life, with everything going just ducky as far as anyone who lived there was concerned. Don’t think it’s fishy. It could be done.

    It would all work. For as along as a thousand years. But what epoch last longer than that anyway? By now, even the thousand-year Reich would be nine percent toast already.

    Thus the glory of the world passes.

  64. Bedbugs are not content with sucking blood… they shit into the wound.

  65. @USA1943

    You ask: why do whites pay … to be told how evil they are ….?”
    I suggest that you direct your question to the CEO’s of Black Rock, State Street and the like. This is their plan in action to mix and ruin the White race and particularly Christians. It’s the Kalergi Plan.

  66. Hate-CRAZED racist drivel.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  67. Right_On says:
    @aandrews

    You can see why Edward I of England and Ferdinand and Isabella in Spain issued Edicts of Expulsion against the Jews.

  68. @Atle

    I’d settle for a flight too close to the sun and a large stew of feathers and melted wax making a mess of some George Floyd monument.

  69. jamie b. says:

    …the White mathematician Claude Shannon … contributed more to STEM … than all Blacks who have ever lived.

    While I do think that black vs white contributions are far from equal, this claim seems a bit extreme. Is there a source? How are contributions quantified?

    If true, this claim would certainly have great rhetorical value, but only if it’s backed by real substance. Otherwise, it would be (rightly) dismissed as something that only an ignorant racist might claim.

    • Agree: Right_On
    • Replies: @Philmuhcrevis
  70. @Colin Wright

    Well honestly this all is not my business, but seeing Americans whine like that, asking what can we do is maddening.

    Why don’t you move out of mixed neighborhoods and get together, why don’t you carry weapons and patrol the streets?

    Explain this to me.

  71. I say have her square off against the Buffalo shooter.

    Live-stream the match.

    • Replies: @RestiveUs
  72. Anonymous[124] • Disclaimer says:

    racialised others

    That is, humanity: blacks-whites-browns-reds-yellows.

    acquire…an ‘oppositional world-view’

    TRANSLATION: blacks’ permanent “blame-others” chips-on-shoulders.

    the multifaceted contours of Whiteness

    That is, the modern world.

    the racial justice project

    A grift wherein bloviating blacks get rich by blaming black failures on non-blacks.

    the not-seeing nature of Whiteness

    A word-salad to distract from the immense, intense Grand Canyon that is blacks’ lack of self-awareness. Note how none of these “race experts” hies off to Ma Africa to make IT better!

    a racially inequitable status quo

    The status quo is already very equitable, accurately reflecting to results of black actions and/or failings.

    white people have no awareness of whiteness as a construction

    Whites are too busy constructing families, companies, communities, and productive/successful countries to heed blacks who MUS (make up shite) to explain the failure of blacks to thrive in any nation on Earth.

    inequities at the heart of whiteness

    Yes! It is highly inequitable that Whites pay more attention to chronic marginalized minority muttonhead losers than their own kith and kin.

    the field in which racialised others are operating

    To wit: fatherless families wherein 75% of black spawn are born literal bastards to 5-kids-from-4-men landwhale mooching momsters who doom them to prison, not college.

    Vietnamese Boat People arrived in the 1970s, broke and knowing no English. They pooled resources, learn American customs, worked hard in shrimping, floor-refinishing, etc., and soon sen their kids to Harvard.

    Black arrived in 1619 and now have the world’s knowledge on their iPhones. They choose to rob stores, kill each other, blame Whites, and remain on the bottom rungs of society.

    Wait until the millions of illegal aliens now in the USA not only suck up welfare traditionally counted on by blacks, but surpass them in status. Who will Kunta Kinte blame them?

    “I’m soooo happy and excited that blames are moving in next door!” said no one ever. And for good reason.

  73. Ghali says:

    What a racist bigotry by a racist neo-Fascist?

  74. Dr. Doom says:

    Why focus on the symptoms and not the DISEASE?
    These foolish blechs are nothing without the RATS.

    Its the RATS that breed them and set them loose in our societies.
    Without the RATS these nobodies would be deported, starved and forgotten.

    FIGHT THE DISEASE OF THE RAT INFESTATION.
    ALL THE SYMPTOMS WILL DISAPPEAR ONCE THE RATS ARE DISPOSED OF…

  75. Anonymous[124] • Disclaimer says:
    @mulga mumblebrain

    Hate-CRAZED racist drivel.

    CRT?

    Agreed.

    Just like the driveling eructations of those malign, mentally-impaired, malingering, mooching mbutus Hank Rogers (aka Ibram Xolani Kendi), Al Sharkton, Jussie Jackson, Okrah Windbag, Tahini Coates, and other money-grabbing melanitwits.

  76. RestiveUs says:
    @Anymike

    And don’t use so much Aramis…

  77. @Anonymous

    Blacks ? Most of the so-called Blacks are partly White.

  78. RestiveUs says:
    @Colin Wright

    Very weird. I clicked the video link in post #70 and went to Bing search results to watch it. There was another video of this Buffalo shooting that included the live-stream footage from the shooter’s GoPro as he drove to the supermarket/crime scene. It was eerily reminiscent of the video from the New Zealand mass shooter some years back: The first-person vantage from inside the car. The shooter muttering to himself about how this needed to be done. Then he pulls up in front of the store, exits the car with his rifle and guns down a white woman in a blue shirt. The live-stream footage stops at that point and switches to the aftermath with the police cordon and emergency workers. When I went to watch it again, the video was suddenly unavailable, having been pulled from the site. I’ve seen the entire video of the New Zealand shooting and this one plays out exactly the same way. As if they followed the same script.

  79. @Anymike

    If you’re going to be a firebug, at least learn drop and roll. It’s just common sense.

    That video I’m only slightly ashamed to say brought a smile to my face. Oh boy, if that retard survives that stunt just imagine how that disfigured mass of melted flesh will feel every time it gazes at itself in the looking glass. Maybe karma is real.

  80. @jamie b.

    While I do think that black vs white contributions are far from equal, this claim seems a bit extreme. Is there a source? How are contributions quantified?

    Here’s a thought. Why not look up Noble Prize recipients for Physics, Chemistry and Medicine and see how many munts made the list.

    • Replies: @jamie b.
  81. @Anonymous

    blacks’ permanent “blame-others” chips-on-shoulders.

    That might be a bit too much truth for some to handle. But thanks for that inciteful, intelligent and most of all hyper accurate post. Pointing out those that come here with nothing and inside of 2 generations are outpacing even whitey in wealth is all one needs to know about the absolute joke that is this mongrel race of ungrateful primitives.

  82. @CelestiaQuesta

    I actually thought you were joking about the comment from the brother. Unbelievable.

  83. Richard B says:
    @CelestiaQuesta

    Haha!

    You beat me to it!

    You’ve fought hard and you saved and earned,
    but all of it’s going to burn.
    And your mind, your tiny mind,
    you know you’ve really been so blind.
    Now’s your time, burn your mind (literally),
    You’re falling far too far behind.
    Oh no, oh no, oh no, you’re gonna burn!

  84. Richard B says:
    @Meretricious

    From the article:

    Blacks have never mattered in math or any other cognitively demanding field.
    How can this be so, if we’re all the same under the skin? Well, if we’re all the same under the skin, it can be explained only by some malevolent force suppressing the huge intellectual potential of the Black community. In other words: White racism has held Blacks back. And the left are very happy with that explanation.

    The key word here is Explanation.

    Because that’s all they’re offering (or in their case forcing). That’s all anyone can offer, whether one is writing for TOO, TUR, whether teaching, or indoctrinating, etc. All any of us have are our explanations. And even the best explanation is still an explanation, still only an example of verbal behavior.

    Explanation is everywhere. In fact, it’s so ubiquitous, so omnipresent, that to understand it – even incompletely – is to be on your way to developing an insight that no other insight can match. It’s found in every human situation including education. In fact, educators, whether in philosophy, the humanities, the arts & sciences, etc. dedicate their lives to explanation and do little else. Certainly nothing that makes them any different from the rest of us.

    So you’d think they could tell us something about Explanation itself. They are, after all, professional explainers. But nope. Nada.

    So what do we get instead? Just read the article or listen to them talk. What you get is Inflation. Not monetary inflation (that’s what you get from the people who control our economies, and also help fund CRT, et al.). No. You get intellectual, social, emotional, egotistical inflation.

    For the last 50+ years, longer in fact, they have pursued a policy of overstatement that lives by continual exaggeration of what they do and who they are. In short, their explanation of the world is riddled with words that are misunderstood and misapplied. In short, Verbal Inflation. It’s their occupational disease. And it’s time we call them on it.

    It’s what you find in the language of all of these world-reforming educationists, abstraction instead of naming, exaggeration of goals and results, seeing the student not as an individual but as an example of some generality (talk about othering), taking any indirect means in place of something straightforward and, above all, mistaking words for facts, and intentions for hard work. This explains their egotistical urge to blur distinctions between their explanation of whatever it is they’re talking about and reality itself. 

    I mean, could you imagine asking any of the people featured in the article, and not just them, What are the conditions of Explanation? Or, So you teach CRT? Tell me then, What is a theory? And in what way does CRT qualify as such? Or, as I once asked one of them, If it’s a theory why do you call it the truth? Their response, by the way, was What does that question even mean? Haha! They’re imbeciles.

    But they’re also the real cancer of the human race.Because verbal inflation leads to verbal cancer. And verbal cancer in our social institutions leads to cancer in our social institutions, leads to cultural incoherence and civilizational collapse. And now we’re back to why they’re the real cancer of the human race. Which means, of course, that treason against them is loyalty to humanity.

  85. jamie b. says:
    @Philmuhcrevis

    That wouldn’t be a bad metric, but it doesn’t quite have the same ring as Langdon’s original claim. Perhaps one Nobel Prize is worth the contribution of a thousand black scientists, but you’d still need to prove it somehow.

    • Replies: @Dave Bowman
  86. Dan-0-lee says:

    Good job that white men get on with discovering stuff; if we had to leave it to POC’s to make their contribution first, to make libtards happy, western civilisation as we know wouldn’t exist.

    • Replies: @Dave Bowman
  87. “What has Dr Rollock taught us? She’s taught us how to cram the maximum of pretension into the minimum of words.

    A cargo cult is a good analogy for the relationship between the greviance studies industry and real scholarship. However, although I am aware that Langdon is (unlike myself) not especially a fan of Richard Dawkins, I think the latter’s First Law of the Conservation of Difficulty, whereby “obscurantism in an academic subject expands to fill the vacuum of its intrinsic simplicity”, is also useful in explaining the pretention and verbosity of such pseudo-scholarship.

  88. @jamie b.

    the contribution of a thousand black scientists

    Do you seriously believe for ONE MOMENT that there are anywhere near a thousand “Black scientists” (ie. trained, qualified, employed, earning, career scientists in any field of endeavour) across the whole of America ?

    Or Great Britain ?

    The whole of Europe, even ?

    Or any other country on earth ?

    If you do, there’s a bridge across the Thames in central London I’d like to sell you.

  89. @Dan-0-lee

    And, courtesy of the ceaseless efforts of the anti-White racist, White-hating Communist Jewish activists who brought millions of un-assimilable, unemployable Blacks to our shores via 60 years of un-debated, un-voted and entirely unwanted mass immigration in the first place, and persuaded said libtards to “protect” them from Whitey, it soon won’t.

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply -


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
$
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Tobias Langdon Comments via RSS
PastClassics
Becker update V1.3.2
The Surprising Elements of Talmudic Judaism
Analyzing the History of a Controversial Movement