The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 Kevin MacDonald Archive
Preface to Giles Corey’s the Sword of Christ
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

Note: Giles Corey’s new book, The Sword of Christ, may be purchased here. Get it before it’s banned!

Giles Corey has written a book that should be read by all Christians as well as White advocates of all theoretical perspectives, including especially those who are seeking a spiritual foundation that is deeply embedded in the history and culture of Europeans. This is excellent scholarship combined with a very fluid writing style. He has thought deeply about all the issues confronting the peoples and cultures of the West.

ORDER IT NOW

Corey is well aware that contemporary Christianity has been massively corrupted. Mainline Protestant and Catholic Churches have become little more than appendages for the various social justice movements of the left, avidly promoting the colonization of the West by other races and cultures, even as religious fervor and attendance dwindle and Christianity itself becomes ever more irrelevant to the national dialogue. On the other hand, Evangelicals, a group that remains vigorously Christian, have been massively duped by the theology of Christian Zionism, their main focus being to promote Israel.

Until the twentieth century, Christianity served the West well. One need only think of the long history of Christians battling to prevent Muslims from establishing a caliphate throughout the West—Charles Martel at the Battle of Tours, the Spanish Reconquista, the defeat of the Turks at the gates of Vienna. The era of Western expansion was accomplished by Christian explorers and colonists. Until quite recently, the flourishing of science, technology, and art occurred entirely within a Christian context.

Much of my scholarly interest has been to attempt to understand the people and culture of the West, resulting in my book Individualism and the Western Liberal Tradition: Evolutionary Origins, History, and Prospects for the Future. As I argue there, individualism lends itself to moral and ethical universalism which led to the religiously based eradication of slavery long before the rise of an elite hostile to Christianity itself. And White intellectuals in the nineteenth century attempting to understand their own moral universalism often attributed it to their racial origins.

Such individualism was not disastrously self-destructive. As Corey notes, “Christian universalism historically posed little to no danger to White survival because it was preached by Whites living in a world ruled by Whites; it was only in the multicultural Egalitarian Regime inseminated in the mid-twentieth century that Christian sacrifice was transformed into a call for racial suicide.” The individualist, Christian West was thus highly adaptive—until the rise of a hostile, Jewish-dominated elite bent on corrupting adaptive forms of Christian individualism in favor of a completely deracinated individualism, now accompanied by powerful religious, media, and academic voices preaching White guilt, often from a Christian perspective.

Instead, Corey advocates a revitalization of Medieval Germanic Christianity based on, in the words of Samuel Francis, “social hierarchy, loyalty to tribe and place (blood and soil), world-acceptance rather than world-rejection, and an ethic that values heroism and military sacrifice.” This medieval Christianity preserved the aristocratic, fundamentally Indo-European culture of the Germanic tribes. This was an adaptive Christianity, a Christianity that was compatible with Western expansion, to the point that by the end of the nineteenth century, the West dominated the planet. Christianity per se is certainly not the problem.

The decline of adaptive Christianity coincides with the post-Enlightenment rise of the Jews throughout the West as an anti-Christian elite, and Corey has a great deal of very interesting material on traditional Christian views of Judaism. Traditional Christian theology viewed the Church as having superseded the Old Testament and that, by rejecting the Church, the Jews had not only rejected God, they were responsible for murdering Christ. My view, developed in Chapter 3 of Separation and Its Discontents: Toward an Evolutionary Theory of Anti-Semitism is that traditional Christian theology was fundamentally anti-Jewish and was developed as a weapon which was used to lessen Jewish economic and political power in the Roman Empire. Here Corey describes the writings of the fourth-century figure, St. John Chrysostom, who has a chapel dedicated to him inside St. Peter’s Basilica in Rome as well as a statue outside the building. His writings on Jews are nothing less than scathing and reflect long-term tensions between Jews and Greeks in Antioch. And Chrysostom was far from alone in his hatred. For example, St. Gregory of Nyssa, also writing in the fourth century: “ [Jews are] murderers of the Lord, assassins of the prophets, rebels against God, God haters, . . . advocates of the devil, race of vipers, slanderers, calumniators, dark-minded people, leaven of the Pharisees, sanhedrin of demons, sinners, wicked men, stoners, and haters of righteousness.” The traditional Church was certainly far from friendly toward Jews.

And although Protestantism was generally far more amenable to Jewish interests even before its current malaise, there certainly are exceptions. Here Corey emphasizes Martin Luther’s writings on Jews. Luther emphasizes Jewish hatred toward Christianity and their sense of superiority vis-à-vis Christians, seeing the latter as “not human; in fact, we hardly deserve to be considered poor worms by them.” But he is also concerned about Jewish economic exploitation and domination of Germans via usury—certainly the biggest complaint about Jews in traditional Europe. And he is repulsed by Talmudic ethics which promote very different moral codes for Jews and non-Jews.

However, much has changed since the origins of Christianity. In the contemporary United States, Christian Zionism has had a very large influence on Evangelical Protestantism whose theology departs radically from traditional Christianity, particularly with respect to the Jews. Corey has an excellent section on how Jews helped shape this new theology; it should be required reading for Christian Zionists because it would open their eyes to the sordid history of the movement. The result of such thinking is that Zionism has often become a vehicle of moral idealism in the minds of a great many gentiles, from Lloyd George to the present, who believe that the restoration of Israel is far more important than the fate of their own people.

Jews have not stood by idly on this but have actively supported the Christian Zionism movement. I noted in a 2010 article on the delusional Pastor John Hagee:

Beginning in 1978, the Likud Party in Israel has taken the lead in organizing this force for Israel, and they have been joined by the neocons. For example, in 2002 the Israeli embassy organized a prayer breakfast with the major Christian Zionists. The main organizations are the Unity Coalition for Israel which is run by Esther Levens and Christians United for Israel, run by David Brog. The Unity Coalition for Israel consists of ~200 Christian and Jewish organizations and has strong connections to neocon think tanks such as the Center for Security Policy, headed by Frank Gaffney, pro-Israel activist organizations the Zionist Organization of America, the Likud Party and the Israeli government. This organization claims to provide material for 1,700 religious radio stations, 245 Christian TV stations, and 120 Christian newspapers.[1]Kevin MacDonald, “Christian Zionism,” The Occidental Observer (March 12, 2010).

https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2010/03/12/kev...onism/

Corey notes that Hagee’s organization, A Night to Honor Israel, has donated over $100 million to right-wing causes in Israel over the years. He has been well rewarded financially for his efforts and is the recipient of numerous awards from Zionist organizations.

Christian Zionism is a fitting reminder of how humans, unlike animals, can be motivated by ideas, including ideas that are completely unrelated to believers’ real interests. These ideas may be disseminated by people who are only doing so for selfish reasons, such as the dishonorable Cyrus Scofield, whose annotated Bible has become central to Christian Zionism. Maladaptive ideas may also be disseminated by people who are utterly opposed to the legitimate interests of believers or even hate Christianity and the West in general. Here Corey discusses the role of Felix Untermeyer, a wealthy Jew, in promoting Scofield and his Bible. It was a religious ideology “with a new worship icon—the modern state of Israel,” and Corey does an excellent job showing how Christian Zionism is a radical departure from traditional Christian theology. I found the following passage quite stunning:

The heresy of Christian Zionism, using an arbitrary and self-contradictory literalist and futurist hermeneutic, contends that the Jews remain God’s chosen people, separate from and superior to the Church; indeed, they believe that earthly Jewish Israel will replace the Church, and that as such, “Christians, and indeed whole nations, will be blessed through their association with, and support of, Israel.”

Although Christian Zionism is far less influential than the Israel Lobby in furthering Jewish interests in the United States, it has certainly had some influence and creates a ready-made cheering section for wars in the Middle East on behalf of Israel. After all, other attitudes typical of Christian Zionists, such as opposition to abortion or pornography, have had much less traction with the current left-oriented establishment despite their powerful commitment to the state of Israel.

Religious thinking is by its nature unbounded—it is infinitely malleable. It is a dangerous sword that can be used to further legitimate interests of believers, or it can become a lethal weapon whereby believers adopt attitudes that are obviously maladaptive. One need only think of religiously based suicide cults, such as People’s Temple (Jonestown), Solar Temple and Heaven’s Gate. Mainstream Christianity from traditional Catholicism to mainstream Protestantism was fundamentally adaptive in terms of creating a healthy family life. It was compatible with a culture characterized by extraordinary scientific and technological creativity and standards of living that have been much envied by the rest of the world.

Corey has great material on Jewish perceptions of Christianity in the Talmud and on negative Jewish influences on culture in the present West, including pornography and the sexual revolution generally. As is so often the case with Jewish activism, the pornography movement has been motivated not solely by money but by hatred toward Christian morality and Christian family functioning. The results have been devastating: huge increases since the 1960s—the breakthrough decade of Jewish power—in all the markers of family dysfunction and poor child outcomes: lower marriage rates, higher births out of wedlock, higher rates of teenage pregnancy, precocious sexuality, high divorce rates, and unstable pair bonds. In other words, the Western family pattern of monogamous nuclear families based on strong husband-wife pair bonds has been under attack from Jewish dominated movements, the most noteworthy of which was psychoanalysis promising an idyllic future if only people would jettison traditional Christian constraints on sexuality. These negative trends in family functioning have been most pronounced among the lower social classes and thus have much less effect on high-IQ middle- and upper-income groups, including Jews as a relatively high-IQ group. The disaster in family patterns has fallen far more severely on the White working class.

Corey’s has an extended treatment of the corrosive effects of pornography, now extended to child pornography and legalized pedophilia as the “final frontier” in the sexual revolution. As in other areas, this starts out by advocating language that makes the activity more or less acceptable depending on the interests of advocates. In the case of pedophilia, the first step is to label them “minor attracted persons,” whereas in the area of free speech, we find labels like “hate speech”—even for speech that is reasonable and fact-based. If issues related to free speech are any guide, there will soon be articles in law journals arguing that pedophilia is normal and should not be punished, and eventually courts will begin to adopt this logic in particular cases. Already Supreme Court justices like Elena Kagan have signaled a willingness to curtail speech on diversity issues,[2]Kevin MacDonald, “Elena Kagan: Jewish Ethnic Networking Eases the Path of a Liberal/Leftist to the Supreme Court, The Occidental Observer (May 20, 2009).

https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2009/05/20/ele...kagan/
and this would be joined by the other liberals, which would mean that curtailing free speech on race is at most one Supreme Court appointment away. And when that happens, it won’t be long before it is embraced by conservatives. As Corey notes in the case of pedophilia, “We are presumably one Supreme Court ruling away from the National Review cocktail ‘conservative’ crowd celebrating pederasty as the next great achievement of individual liberty.”

Given the exhaustive summary of the negative effects of pornography—including neurological impairments related to impulsivity and lessened interest in familial relationships of love and nurturance—it is horrifying indeed that “sixty percent of boys and thirty percent of girls were exposed to pornography in early adolescence, including ‘bondage, rape, and child pornography’, and another which concludes that children under ten years old now account for over twenty percent of online pornographic consumption.” This definitely was not happening when I was growing up in the 1950s, prior to the deluge. I agree with Corey’s conclusion, “We have conclusively established that Jewish leadership and participation was instrumental in and a necessary condition of the pornographic war that has struck at the most sacred foundation of the West, the family.” As Freud famously said, “we are bringing them the plague.”

Corey has an excellent and exhaustive section on Jewish ritual murder—an absolutely convincing presentation on a topic that, like so much of Jewish history, is a minefield for serious scholars. As he notes, “There are … hundreds of accusations and cases of Jewish ritual murder, each just as sadistically depraved as the last, involving barrels of nails, crucifixion, decapitation, spit-roasting, stoning, and a litany of other barbaric evils; we could fill entire volumes with the accounts of each of these innocent lives so cruelly taken from this world.”

This is a topic that I have never written about, although I was somewhat familiar with Blood Passover, Ariel Toaff’s book on the topic. As to be expected, Toaff’s book was condemned by the activist Jewish community and he was pressured into publishing an apology, promising to prevent distribution of his book, etc. However, we should not be surprised to find that such practices occurred. Ritual murder is an extreme manifestation of normative Jewish hostility toward the surrounding society which is an important facet of the entire subject. The eighteenth-century English historian Edward Gibbon was struck by the fanatical hatred of Jews in the ancient world:

From the reign of Nero to that of Antoninus Pius, the Jews discovered a fierce impatience of the dominion of Rome, which repeatedly broke out in the most furious massacres and insurrections. Humanity is shocked at the recital of the horrid cruelties which they committed in the cities of Egypt, of Cyprus, and of Cyrene, where they dwelt in treacherous friendship with the unsuspecting natives; and we are tempted to applaud the severe retaliation which was exercised by the arms of the legions against a race of fanatics, whose dire and credulous superstition seemed to render them the implacable enemies not only of the Roman government, but of human kind.[3]Edward Gibbon, The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, Vol.1, ed. J. B. Bury (London: Methuen, 1909), 78.

The nineteenth-century Spanish historian José Amador de los Rios wrote of the Spanish Jews who assisted the Muslim conquest of Spain that “without any love for the soil where they lived, without any of those affections that ennoble a people, and finally without sentiments of generosity, they aspired only to feed their avarice and to accomplish the ruin of the Goths; taking the opportunity to manifest their rancor, and boasting of the hatreds that they had hoarded up so many centuries.”[4]Quoted in W. T. Walsh, Isabella of Spain: The Last Crusader (New York: Robert M. McBride, 1930), 196.

As I noted in an article titled “Stalin’s Willing Executioners: Jews as a Hostile Elite in the Soviet Union,” “Hatred toward the peoples and cultures of non-Jews and the image of enslaved ancestors as victims of anti-Semitism have been the Jewish norm throughout history—much commented on, from Tacitus (“they regard the rest of mankind with all the hatred of enemies”[5]Tacitus, The History 5, 4, 659.) to the present.”[6]Kevin MacDonald, “Stalin’s Willing Executioners: Jews as a Hostile Elite in the USSR.” Review of Yuri Slezkine’s The Jewish Century. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. The Occidental Quarterly, 5(3), 65–100, 93–94. Toaff brings out the revenge motive: “In their collective mentality, the Passover Seder had long since transformed itself into a celebration in which the wish for the forthcoming redemption of the people of Israel moved from aspiration to revenge, and then to cursing their Christian persecutors, the current heirs to the wicked Pharaoh of Egypt.”

Hatred and revenge were clearly on display in the early decades of the Soviet Union, a period in which around 20 million people were murdered. From “Stalin’s Willing Executioners,” a review of Yuri Slezkine’s The Jewish Century:

There can be little doubt that Lenin’s contempt for “the thick-skulled, boorish, inert, and bearishly savage Russian or Ukrainian peasant” was shared by the vast majority of shtetl Jews prior to the Revolution and after it. Those Jews who defiled the holy places of traditional Russian culture and published anti-Christian periodicals doubtless reveled in their tasks for entirely Jewish reasons, and, as Gorky worried, their activities not unreasonably stoked the anti-Semitism of the period. Given the anti-Christian attitudes of traditional shtetl Jews, it is very difficult to believe that the Jews engaged in campaigns against Christianity did not have a sense of revenge against the old culture that they held in such contempt. …

Slezkine seems comfortable with revenge as a Jewish motive, but he does not consider traditional Jewish culture itself to be a contributor to Jewish attitudes toward traditional Russia, even though he notes that a very traditional part of Jewish culture was to despise the Russians and their culture. (Even the Jewish literati despised all of traditional Russian culture, apart from Pushkin and a few literary icons.) Indeed, one wonders what would motivate the Jewish commissars to revenge apart from motives related to their Jewish identity. …

Slezkine’s argument that Jews were critically involved in destroying traditional Russian institutions, liquidating Russian nationalists, murdering the tsar and his family, dispossessing and murdering the kulaks, and destroying the Orthodox Church has been made by many other writers over the years. …

The situation prompts reflection on what might have happened in the United States had American Communists and their sympathizers assumed power. The “red diaper babies” came from Jewish families which “around the breakfast table, day after day, in Scarsdale, Newton, Great Neck, and Beverly Hills have discussed what an awful, corrupt, immoral, undemocratic, racist society the United States is.”[7]This quote comes from Kevin MacDonald, The Culture of Critique, Chapter 3. … It is easy to imagine which sectors of American society would have been deemed overly backward and religious and therefore worthy of mass murder by the American counterparts of the Jewish elite in the Soviet Union—the ones who journeyed to Ellis Island instead of Moscow. The descendants of these overly backward and religious people now loom large among the “red state” voters who have been so important in recent national elections. Jewish animosity toward the Christian culture that is so deeply ingrained in much of America is legendary. As Joel Kotkin points out, “for generations, [American] Jews have viewed religious conservatives with a combination of fear and disdain.” And as Elliott Abrams notes, the American Jewish community “clings to what is at bottom a dark vision of America, as a land permeated with anti-Semitism and always on the verge of anti-Semitic outbursts.”

As the quote from neocon Elliott Abrams—and much else—indicate, this fear and loathing continues into the present. Consistent with what we know of the psychology of ethnocentrism, a fundamental motivation of Jewish intellectuals and activists involved in social criticism has simply been hatred of the non-Jewish power structure perceived as anti-Jewish and deeply immoral—Susan Sontag’s “the white race is the cancer of human history,” which was published in Partisan Review, a prominent literary journal associated with the New York Intellectuals (a Jewish intellectual movement), is emblematic.

As I write this in the summer of 2020, we are experiencing what feels like the end game in the Jewish conquest of White America. Because Jews have become a hostile elite with a powerful position in the media and educational system, Jewish attitudes in the 1950s that the U.S. is an “awful, corrupt, immoral, undemocratic, racist society” are now entirely mainstream and the cancel culture that we see now is indeed directed most of all toward White red state voters, particularly in the South. Cancel culture started with toppling Confederate monuments, but of course it didn’t stop there, so now statues of the Founding Fathers are being destroyed and there are demands that statues dedicated to Christian religious figures be removed. Jews in particular have demanded the removal of a statue of King Louis IX of France because of his attempt to curb Jewish moneylending in the interests of his people and for burning 12000 copies of the Talmud.

The Cathedral of Notre Dame burning, April 15, 2019. Much of the cathedral was built during the reign of St. Louis.
The Cathedral of Notre Dame burning, April 15, 2019. Much of the cathedral was built during the reign of St. Louis.

This hatred won’t end if and when Whites become a minority. Jews were responsible for the 1965 immigration law that opened up the United States to immigration from all over the world, and they have energetically worked to make alliances with these immigrant groups who are encouraged to hate White America and often adopt anti-White rhetoric almost as soon as they arrive because they can see the political advantages of doing so.

This won’t end well. As I concluded in my recent book, Individualism and the Western Liberal Tradition:

I agree with Enoch Powell: “as I look ahead, I am filled with foreboding; like the Roman, I seem to see ‘the River Tiber foaming with much blood.’”[8]“Enoch Powell’s ‘Rivers of Blood’ Speech,” The Telegraph (November 6, 2007).

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/3643823/Enoch-Po...h.html
All the utopias dreamed up by the Left inevitably lead to bloodshed—because they conflict with human nature. The classical Marxist Utopian vision of a classless society in the USSR self-destructed, but only after murdering millions of its own people. Now the multicultural utopian version that has become dominant throughout the West is showing signs of producing intense opposition and irreconcilable polarization.

Given the very large Jewish involvement in these projects consequent to the Jewish rise to elite status throughout the West, the big picture is that the thrust of Jewish power has been to create societies envisioned as being good for Jews, inevitably advertised in idealistic, morally uplifting, humanitarian terms [to appeal to the evolutionary psychology of individualism where social ties are based on belong to moral communities rather than communities based on kinship ties]. Historically, such projects have typically not ended well and have resulted in massive social upheavals. It would thus not be surprising if current social divisions result in a movement characterized by anti-Jewish overtones. …

All of the measures of White representation in the forces of social control will continue to decline in the coming years given the continued deterioration of the demographic situation. At this point, even stopping immigration completely and deporting illegals would not be enough to preserve a White America long term.

The left and its big business allies have created a monster. Whites have to realize that if they do nothing, they will be increasingly victimized and vilified in the coming decades as the monster continues to gain power. Better that any blood be shed sooner rather than later.

ORDER IT NOW

What happened in the early decades of the Soviet Union is a chilling reminder of what can happen when an alien hostile elite seizes control of a country.

I agree entirely with Corey’s conclusions and recommendations for a revival centered around the adaptive aspects of Christianity—the aspects that produced Western expansion, innovation, discovery, individual freedom, economic prosperity, and strong family bonds. A Christianity that is adaptive in the evolutionary sense of survival and reproduction and fundamentally cognizant of the mistakes of the past.

We must not tolerate subversion. Liberalism must go; we cannot afford to repeat the mistakes of the Enlightenment. We cannot afford to countenance any further anti-American, anti-family, anti-White speech, and this should be reflected in a new Constitution. Just as conservatism was not enough, the United States Constitution was not enough, with gaps that left it gaping wide for judicial “interpretation.” For another thing, we must circle the wagons and inculcate the männerbund, restraining our individualism at least for the time being. For another, we must return to our Lord and Savior. A nation without faith can have no guiding light, no purpose, no drive, no Mission. Izaak Walton, writing of his friend John Donne’s last days, described the body “which was once a temple of the Holy Ghost and is now become a small quantity of Christian dust.” His last line: “But I shall see it reanimated.”

Kevin MacDonald, August 9, 2020

Notes

[1] Kevin MacDonald, “Christian Zionism,” The Occidental Observer (March 12, 2010).

https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2010/03/12/kevin-macdonald-christian-zionism/

[2] Kevin MacDonald, “Elena Kagan: Jewish Ethnic Networking Eases the Path of a Liberal/Leftist to the Supreme Court, The Occidental Observer (May 20, 2009).

https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2009/05/20/elena-kagan/

[3] Edward Gibbon, The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, Vol.1, ed. J. B. Bury (London: Methuen, 1909), 78.

[4] Quoted in W. T. Walsh, Isabella of Spain: The Last Crusader (New York: Robert M. McBride, 1930), 196.

[5] Tacitus, The History 5, 4, 659.

[6] Kevin MacDonald, “Stalin’s Willing Executioners: Jews as a Hostile Elite in the USSR.” Review of Yuri Slezkine’s The Jewish Century. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. The Occidental Quarterly, 5(3), 65–100, 93–94.

[7] This quote comes from Kevin MacDonald, The Culture of Critique, Chapter 3.

[8] “Enoch Powell’s ‘Rivers of Blood’ Speech,” The Telegraph (November 6, 2007).

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/3643823/Enoch-Powells-Rivers-of-Blood-speech.html

(Republished from The Occidental Observer by permission of author or representative)
 
• Category: History, Ideology • Tags: Christianity, Immigration, Jews, Zionism 
Hide 181 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. Anon[122] • Disclaimer says:

    A complete larp. No relevance to reality. An internet fantasy.

  2. Vasilios says:
    @Anon

    You doth protest too much.

  3. Franz says:

    —the aspects that produced Western expansion, innovation, discovery, individual freedom, economic prosperity, and strong family bonds

    Those aspects?

    They came when the wealth of Venice brought back the wisdom the Ancient Greeks and the Hermetic Corpus into the European world.

    Ancient fire rekindled those “aspects” and Christianity helped mostly by staying out of the way.

  4. On September 24, I’ll be deposing Heidi Beirich formerly of the Southern Poverty Law Center for my lawsuit against the SPLC.

    https://craignelsen.com/nelsen_v_splc/

    I can ask her just about anything I want and she has to answer under oath. If there were ever anyone who seems to ooze the hatred Prof MacDonald writes about above, it is she. In the internal emails from the SPLC I obtained through discovery, she tells the author of a hit piece on me that appeared in her Hatewatch blog to “Go get him”.

    https://craignelsen.com/nelsen_v_splc/discovery/PLAINTIFF_REQ/emails/

    [MORE]

    The hit piece scuttled an effort I had undertaken to build a program to help stem the epidemic of “deaths of despair” ravaging white males in the US. What kind of person wants to destroy an effort to help guys who are suicidal? Someone filled with a stupendous hatred, that’s who.

    By the way, I’m fighting the SPLC alone, representing myself, and with no funding, so if you could please help out financially, that would be extremely helpful and appreciated.

    https://craignelsen.com/splc_facts.php

    One thing we white people absolutely must get over is this terror of being called names–in particular “anti-Semite”. That term should be consigned to the trash can.

    Anti-Semitism is a mortal sin of which anyone in the world can be guilty except a Jew and to be guilty of which requires nothing more than the accusation of such by any Jew. To the extent we stupidly buy the mortal sin bit, we hand over an extremely powerful weapon.

    If someone asks me whether I hate Jews, my answer is that I only hate the ones who hate me first.

    If anyone has a question they want me to ask Heidi, put it in the comments below. I can imagine Prof MacDonald might have a few, as Heidi has been vicious against him over the years.

    One of the most disappointing things I’ve learned since filing this case is what wall-to-wall cowards American Gentile lawyers are. I haven’t been able to find even one who will take my case. As one lawyer told me, “Look, we can represent murderers, rapists, the worst scum of humanity, and no one blinks an eye, but to represent someone even called a white supremacist–it doesn’t matter whether they are…that’s the lowest of the low.” Then he declined to take my case, even knowing it’s a good case, and that I suffered a real injustice (not to mention all the guys who never got the opportunity to join my really innovative program).

    What these cowards apparently can’t understand is that their timid cowardice won’t save them in the end. They are marked for destruction just as Kevin MacDonald and I are.

    Jewish lawyers I’ve asked just flat out say no, and aren’t shy about saying it’s for ethnic reasons.

  5. Trying to save White Europeans with revitalized Christianity seems to be a hopeless task, and it is true that modern Christianity has been corrupted,

    contemporary Christianity has been massively corrupted

    But the real problem that this essay glosses over is the Christianity itself was an imposition on the European tribes by Rome. White Europeans lost their identity with the conversion to Abramahic desert demon religion that has nothing to do with their own natural inspirations living in forests.

    I don’t think Christianity should be saved. See the heated responses to “Christ Come Back And Save Us”

    http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=212334

    Yukon Jack August 21, 2020 at 3:00 pm | Permalink

    The article concludes “A revitalized Christianity is the answer.”

    I couldn’t disagree more. Christianity needs to be thrown out – the baby, the bathwater, and the pan. All of it purged from your mind forever and ever. Why? Well Darkmoon and McDonald do not have a clue do they?

    [MORE]

    Christianity has failed your genes, white people are doomed because of what this theology has rendered, a weak pathetic man unable to defend himself. Even now as we are being extinguished Christianity is unable to get one shred of will to rise up and do something. And it won’t because it can not.

    Christianity has always been a death cult, hatred of the body in favor of the spirit, attempting to gain heaven as you sacrifice the body. White people are flesh, the cult downgraded the flesh and now that flesh is being erased. How can you object, was not that your goal all along?

    When you are being led to the gallows by the Jew and his minions just remember why your Christ failed you, you made your salvation by a Jewish man who affirmed the Torah, you said the gates of heaven were only through one man, a Jewish carpenter. The Jews who penned the NT propaganda new exactly what they were doing, they owned you by making God a Jew.

    THE GREATEST TRAGEDY OF EUROPEANS WAS CONVERSION TO CHRIST INSANITY. FROM THAT POINT THEY COULD NOT RECOVER, AND IT HAS BEEN DOWN HILL EVER SINCE, WHAT IS GOING DOWN NOW IS THE FINAL EXTINCTION EVENT.

    GLOBAL WARMING WAS MASS CULTURAL INSANITY ALONG WITH CORONAVIRUS. BUT THE BIGGEST SCAM WAS THAT A JEWISH MAN COULD BE YOUR SAVIOR

    Europeans were headed for extinction when they were forcefully converted and made into slaves of a Jewish run state. Now in France, the Holocaust is a new state religion, and 99% of the Christians don’t have a problem with that, they are sympathetic to the plight of the poor Jews. Those evil Nazis tried to roast them in ovens.

    So long as white people accept the evil Hitler premise they are doomed. So long as you agree that putting Jews in ovens is wrong, you are doomed. So long as you think killing Jews is murder and a crime, you are doomed. So long as you see some Jewish man dying for your sins, you are as gullible as hell. If you think Jerusalem is the most holy town on the planet, you are clueless.

    White women know we are doomed which is why so many are associating with BLM, they are trading their lives for agreeing that blacks are superior. Many of them are willing to have half black mud babies. That is pretty catastrophic I would say, and I would also say we lost when that happens. I happen to live in a liberal town and see the results daily. I see white women of Irish descent with half black babies. That is literal race suicide. I see their act as a survival strategy and I know and accept we lost.

    We lost when we were converted to a religion that told us sex was dirty. We lost when we abandoned reverence for Nature and instead lifted our hearts up to space empire in the heavens above. We lost when the Anunnaki cross bred into our genome, we were domesticated and lost living in the wild “Eden” for ever.

    And it seems clear to me our conversion into a domesticated slave then into a Anunnaki worshipping cult was intentional, all direct by a higher mind over a long period of time.

    And the joke is (according to many researchers) Jerusalem is a Anunnaki space port. We are worshipping space pirates (who artifiicially created us) like some backwards pacific islander who builds stick airplanes to get cargo.

    I, for one, will not pick up arms to save Christianity. It needs to go and be flushed down the toilet forever, I will not try to save a religion that worships the Jew as God. I will never defend a religion which is based on the lies in the Torah. I am NOT guilty for being born or wanting to be free. The gods are guilty for creation, not me. My only goal in life is to see Jerusalem nuked, the Dome of the Rock turned into a crater of glass. Only by erasing the center of Abrahamic religions can we be set free.

    Like I always say – “man will only be free when the last Christian Identity pastor is strangled with the entrails of last Rabbi.” I do not identify myself as some thing in some cult which is subverted by Jews. I do not wake up in the morning and say, I am a Christian united for Israel. No, I think, maybe today someone with nuke Israel, now that would be a good day.

    I have the right to exist free and not under any Church or Jewish Law. I have a right to build a home or shelter without getting a “permit” from some judge or beaurucrat. I have the right to judge for myself which wars I will fight. I have the right to keep my hard earned money, I am NOT part of any collective, my income is NOT part of the national income. I do not believe, nor will I ever lift my heart up to a Jewish character as my lord.

    I have no desire to be part of some Hebrew Borg hive mind collective called religion or state. I do not care what the “authority” says, or this psychos like Bill Gates who wants to vaccinate the world. I believe the most moral act is to kill these monsters without any reservations. I do not believe I need to be ordered by the state to defend myself as I am free and I have the right to decide who needs to die for crimes against myself.

    The biggest joke of this essay is the title itself: “Christ Come Back And Save Us”. If you are waiting for the Jewish fiction to rescue you then I say it is a safe bet you are wasting your time. Jesus is fiction. Salvation is fiction. How do I know? No man can walk on water or raise the dead. Those attributes are fictional claims of the writers who invented this new Jewish sun god. The Jew Zeus can not save you, and in fact, this god is a ruse meant to enslave you to the state, and now the state has been taken by Jewish power, then this belief will only confuse and bind you to the problem.

    • Agree: Ponce Faggy
    • Thanks: dogbumbreath
  6. Alas, Christianity is no longer the socio-cultural super-glue of yesteryear. Evolution of science brought better grasp of physical things and doubts about the spiritual. Hardly any white scientist of today has a religious conviction anymore. Christianity itself has not been successful at providing answers to modern questions. The Old Testament, which contains many original elements of Talmud and Torah, and is basically about a vengeful and punishing Jahweh. The New Testament, which is more about Jesus and a humanistic loving approach, was an attempt to make the Christian faith, when hell and damnation no longer worked in the West and carrot-and-stick doctrine was found to be more effective. New versions of the Talmud and Qur’an were deemed unneccessary because their followers are still adhering faithfully and unquestioning to the originals.

    Jews hate Christians and want their demise. Already, they had little respect for Jesus, and the New Testament makes them disrespect and loathe Christians even more. You would expect Christian leaders to answer such threat with consolidation and fortification measures. But instead they weakened and divided their organisation. The Vatican has been in bed with all sorts of powers and Reformed flavors of Christian churches are known for their many splinter factions. The PR around sexual misconducts in Christian institutions has also been unfortunate. As all religious setups in the world involve humans, it can be expected that sexual misconduct can be found in all these setups. Whereas other setups kept managing to suppress and stifle the coming to light of incidents, the Christian setups have responded awkwardly to publicities. They could have bent it to their advantage by stating “we will clean our house thoroughly and we are the first and only ones to do so!”. But now, Christian setups seem to be the only guilty ones. Another argument for Christians to leave their church, while other setups remain unscathed.

    Thanks to the private initiatives of Ron Unz and other alternative publishers, we come to realize how Western societies have been sabotaged not only by global elites, but also by our own white political leaders, scientists, scholars and journalists. One would expect that Christian leaders would not be guilty or party in this, but they are. Christianity is interwoven in all aspects of world power and Christian worldly political knowledge, networking and intelligence is sublime and perfectly up to scratch. It has been from the beginning; every monastry had a fine library and means to copy and spread all sorts of documents. Think of the Jesuits as only one example of effective high level knowledge and intelligence, orchestrated from the Vatican.

    For these reasons, i find that Christian institutions has sold us out like any other worthwhile institution that was entrusted with the guarding of interests of its underlings. After decades of intense sabotage from all directions, i don’t see Christianity as a shield and sword strong enough, certaiy not in its present shape and in this late stage.

    • Agree: Alden
    • Replies: @RoatanBill
    , @Z-man
  7. Layman says:

    +Until the twentieth century, Christianity served the West well.+

    How very arrogant. How about the West serving Christ instead?! The true mediaeval Christianity actually understood this very well and did not put tribe before faith; eg the mediaeval hostility to Jews had strictly religious, not tribal, reasons.

    The Byzantine version of Christianity accepted Christians of every tribe (not just Greeks but Copts, Ethiops, Arabs, Armenians, Slavs etc.) The Western Christianity originally did so as well; only after the Germanic tribes took over the Roman Church did the tribal start to prevail over faith and corrupt the latter, ever so slowly (think of Filioque and papal primacy, which did not take full force until ΧΙ c.; crusades against Eastern Christians ensued in XIII c., etc.).

    The author rightly claims that modern Christianity is corrupt but this corruption is the end result of putting other things before faith: tribe, politics, social status etc. Christian nations should be proud of their heritage but this is because these nations were built on Christ and for Christ; Christianity is their foundation and not a means to an end.

  8. Icy Blast says:
    @Franz

    You are a victim of American-style anti-Catholic propaganda. But you are not alone – there are millions of sheep in the cage with you. Even Tucker Carlson, in the Year 2020, as he witnesses the death throes of the great Protestant experiment we call the United States, thinks the Middle Ages were “a thousand years of darkness.” I would recommend some books for you but I’m quite sure you won’t read anything that challenges your quintessentially American fantasies about European history.

    • Agree: Iris
  9. All one needs to know is that MacDonald hates white people as they actually exist.

    • Replies: @ThreeCranes
  10. Jewish writer Marcus Eli Ravage (1884-1965), said out loud, that Christianity was a Jewish plot to destroy Europe’s ancient cultures, its invention the greatest crime ever by Jews, enervating the gentile fighting spirit in ancient times, and supplanting native culture & myths with Jewish ones

    Islam as well is regarded as a Jewish creation, a religion of conquest also enshrining the ‘holy Jew’ at its centre, invented when the Byzantines too strongly resisted Jewish activity, and eventually wiping out their empire as well

    Historian Edward Gibbon (1737-94) cited above, in his ‘Decline & Fall of the Roman Empire’ also supported this idea that it was the Jewish-based ‘faith’ that ruined Rome.

    We certainly need religion in culture … but Christianity is a dead end. We need to find our Western version of the meditation-yoga + warrior cultures of the Asian reincarnation religions, without so much of the often-Jewish-promoted, more passive Buddhism.

    Christianity imploded as Protestantism led people to actually read the Bible ‘Holy Book’, and people came to see that despite some lovely passages, it is a monstrously barbaric text. A religion centred on child genital mutilation? ‘God-ordered’ genocides of not only men but also women and children and livestock? Barbaric cruelty and torture and slavery? The cult of conquering, mutilating, massacring Jews as a ‘holy chosen’ people? Even the Buddhist-saying borrowing supposedly ‘nice’ Jesus has his rough bad moments. And at its foundation:

  11. GMC says:

    They hung an outspoken holy man, a Son, a threat to Jews, on a cross to die. And today in Israel the young ones say -” We’d do it again”. and they don’t see Jesus Christ, as just any Holy Man – he was very Special – he had a soul, he believed in goodness and honesty , so why would any normal Christian, Not pick up on that ? Why would some dufus that says he doesn’t believe in Christ or religion, not pick up on the main menu of the Zionist Jews and others, verses the ” Guy named Jesus “? The Zionist religion is real and it has an Agenda. There is a huge War going on , and its against all normal folks and/or with their normal , decent religion – and the Zionists, the fanatical Muslims, the Satanists, the Owners, etc. started it decades ago, if not Centuries ago. If it’s not obvious to everyone – here’s your sign ! as Foxworthy used to say.

  12. Perceptive article, Kevin MacDonald (as usual). But the horses have left the barn.

    Yes, European-derived peoples–as well as the extraordinary civilizations that they brought forth–are in social decline. Yes, Jewish advocacy and faux-utopian, Jewish-lead intellectual and political movements are a huge reason why.

    But is an ‘adaptive’ renewal of Christianity our ticket to rebirth?

    Sounds like this route might be an unworkable long shot. The teachings allegedly given by the Jewish man-God we know as Christ do not address the urgent, contemporary, social and political needs of the White race. This is one reason why our churches have become so useless.

    Christ’s lofty and universal teachings–despite their uplifting appeals–actually undermine White continuity and White survival in today’s world. Further, the ever-splintering strains of Christianity put us at greater and greater risk of outside infiltration (and predation) as well as heightened Jewish exploitation. Christianity is too inclusive for its own good.

    Christianity’s inherent weaknesses are not only exacerbated by Christ’s pedigree, but by the Christian establishment’s attachment to the Old Testament. This includes the OT’s founding myths, yarns, and creeds, many of which are totally contrary to Christ’s core teachings. There’s no way around this.

    Love your enemies.

    No. Sorry. Christ got it wrong. I will try to forgive my enemies, but I will never love them. Are you kidding? But hey–I’m reasonable. Let’s cut a deal and go our separate ways.

    Do unto to others as you would have them do unto you.

    Nice sentiment but it’s far older than Jesus. Confucius articulated the same precept 500 years before Christ. It has practical limitations, too. Business is business, after all.

    Biblical historiography also does not jibe with modern science. Not in the slightest. Too many ridiculous miracles. Too much superstition. Very little physical evidence for any of it. The gulf between archeological science and Judeo-Christian mythology is wide and will inevitably widen further over time. Traditional faiths are in decline. This will continue.

    As for the Jews, it’s their inordinate ‘success’ (wealth, power), exclusion, mythos, the fruits of ‘Holocaustianity’, and self-worship that keep this hyper-ethnocentric tribe so unified.

    Maybe it’s time for us European-derived peoples to reconsider Greco-Roman Paganism. Considering the world’s disunity and strife, a multi-god view makes as much sense as synthetic monotheism. In any event, It remains likely that continued scientific discovery will degrade most, traditional religious dogma.

    The big picture is that the thrust of Jewish power has been to create societies envisioned as being good for Jews, inevitably advertised in idealistic, morally uplifting, humanitarian terms [to appeal to the evolutionary psychology of individualism where social ties are based on belong to moral communities rather than communities based on kinship ties].

    These patterns of Jewish conduct and Christian belief bring to mind how Whites have been divided (and diminished) by pie-in-the-sky utopian thinking. This includes Christianity and, equally, ‘compassionate’ liberalism–which has turned out to be a wolf in sheep’s clothing.

    Meanwhile, we White consumers of mass media are accustomed to hearing about ‘the Black vote’, ‘the Hispanic vote’, and of course ‘the Jewish vote’ (since these politically-cohesive groups vote according to their group interests without shame) but ‘good whites’ are admonished to vote only along ideological lines such as ‘conservative’ and ‘liberal’ since ‘racial solidarity’ is evil (when practiced by Whites).

    Who’s scripting this bullshit?

    This indoctrinated, politically-correct thinking splits the White vote, making Whites collectively weaker.

    These double standards have been put in place by design. Diabolical design.

    • Replies: @Art
  13. If there had never been a Jewjsh entrepreneur willing to push boundaries in favour of freer access to pornography is there any doubt that there would have been major changes to the sexual morality of Americans based on women’s education and joining the paid workforce plus, as much as anything, the pill and other effective methods of birth control. One might add too the reduction of fear of STDs because of the new antibiotics.

    • Replies: @Iris
  14. Corey and McDonald propose a revitalisation of Christianity and the curtailment of Liberalism. This would mean practically a return to the rule of traditional conservatism.

    I don’t believe that this can succeed. Our reality was consolidated by wars and is sustained in part by economic power. Corey seems to want to return to traditional forms of authority which pressuposed economic inequality which created economic power. How could we curtail economic power if at the same time we seek traditional economic inequality? Women are also not going to take traditional roles. Christianity is not able to play this role anymore because nobody wants it. And even conservatives don’t follow traditional conservatism anymore.

    It’s not possible to take back what most people think it’s their rights and to adopt what seems to be an autoritarian order and hierarchical social relations. Maybe this is what we have now in a disguised form: society offers entertainement and superficial freedom in order to disguise power relations. Can we transform power with more power, with more authority, with repression? I don’t think so.

    Maybe we should only see which points are negative points in our times and which points are positive points and try to oppose or to strenghten them. We cannot go back to the times when the West could prevail in the world because this world doesn’t exist anymore. But we can and we should outlaw groups which promote militarism and wars. Maybe instead of revitalising Christianity we should limit the power of religions. Years ago Germany wanted to go against Scientology. This wasn’t possible because the Americans prevented that with a few letters to the German government (“you don’t dare to touch our Scientology”). Religions shouldn’t be allowed to discriminate against other people. Temples should be open every time to everybody (just like Churchs are). We shouldn’t allow special groups like think tanks which promote wars and inequality because they are a form of discrimination. One aspect of liberalism is equality. We should seek equality of opinion, of power, of social relations.

    • Agree: American Citizen 2.0
    • Thanks: Iris
    • Replies: @American Citizen 2.0
  15. Dumbo says:

    A Christianity that is adaptive in the evolutionary sense of survival and reproduction and fundamentally cognizant of the mistakes of the past.

    I haven’t read the book, but this seems a misunderstanding of religion in general and Christianity in particular. “Evolutionary sense”? What you talking about, Willis? Religion is mainly about transcendence of Earthly things and salvation of the soul. Beyond the Earth, beyond the body. That it also helps to maintain social order and morality and promotes group survival or reproduction is also important, but a secondary aspect of the whole thing, a consequence, not the end.

    Christianity seems to have been pretty adaptive, adapting differently to different times and societies. In fact one of its main messages was against the rigidity or legalism of ancient Judaism (Pharisees).

    The problem is that lately it has become too adaptive, it even adapted to Globo-Homo (at least some denominations).

    But, if people no longer believe in it, it’s difficult to restore it. I personally like Catholicism, but the current “Pope” doesn’t help at all, does it?

  16. chris says:
    @Anon

    … but enough about you!

    • Agree: Charles
    • LOL: Z-man
  17. robwin says:

    I have often wondered if the Holodomor had little or nothing to do with collectivization, but was really an act of revenge on the Ukrainians by the Khazars for perceived mistreatment going back to the Middle Ages. Collectivization was a cover up meant for public consumption.

  18. Biff says:

    This won’t end well. As I concluded in my recent gook

    A gook worth seeing.

  19. noname27 says: • Website

    “Giles Corey has written a book that should be read by all Christians.”

    My blog is a blog that should be read by everyone, especially so-called Christians. https://isthefathercallingyoutohisson.wordpress.com/

  20. Thomasina says:
    @Craig Nelsen

    The SPLC tracks and labels anyone or any group who they deem to be anti-semitic, anti-immigrant, anti-Muslim, or anti-Black. From what I quickly read, the courts apparently (why, I don’t know) allow other groups (or cities) to use whatever designation the SPLC labels a particular group with as far as hiring or firing.

    Ask Heidi to define “discrimination”. Ask her to define “hate speech”. Ask her if she or the organization she represented at the time is against discrimination or hate speech. Ask her if she considers speech against Whites as hate speech. If she answers “no”, ask her why. If she answers that Whites are the majority, and therefore can’t be hurt by hate speech, then ask her this question: what does she consider a majority? 51%? 60%? 49%? 80% Ask her if the SPLC even tracks cases of anti-White hate speech.

    There are countless articles about the denigration of Whites in the media nowadays. We are being blamed for everything, called White Supremacists, Nazis. Our statues are being overturned, our history rewritten. Photocopy the best articles you can find, and then one by one start reading the headlines to her. Ask her if she considers each one a form of anti-White hate speech. Then ask her whether SPLC sanctioned the newspapers or Internet site (or whatever it was) as being anti-White for each particular article. Did they label them (or however it’s done at the SPLC)? If not, ask her why not.

    Ask her how many times the SPLC have labeled a person/a group/an organization as being anti-White. Lay out your case showing hatred against Whites.

    Ask her to describe what hate speech might do to a person’s self-esteem. Ask her whether she feels a person’s self-esteem would be heightened or diminished by hate speech. Ask her: if a particular group was being singled out for hate speech, what do you think that would do to their self-esteem?

    Ask her if she has any medical expertise, whether she holds a doctorate in psychology/psychiatry. Ask her how the SPLC goes about determining whether someone might be hurt by hate speech. Do they have a resident psychologist or hate speech expert on staff? Ask her if Whites in the area you wanted to start up your business in were disproportionately being affected by drug use, how is it she would have any idea how they might be feeling?

    I’ll think more on it. You probably already have all of these questions, but I hope it helps. Also, in the criminal justice system, your prior record can’t be brought up until sentencing occurs. That way the defendant is not prejudiced by his past practice. How is it that the SPLC can tar and feather people for something they’ve done in the past (not that you’ve done anything bad)? Who gave them the right to continually sanction people into the future, hurting their future endeavors?

    What a complete racket.

    Although I know you offered your services to non-Whites, find any articles you can (or statements from doctors/social workers, etc.) that state there is a problem with Whites in the area as far as drug use.

    Cheers.

    • Replies: @Craig Nelsen
  21. Anonymous[115] • Disclaimer says:

    This hatred won’t end if and when Whites become a minority. Jews were responsible for the 1965 immigration law that opened up the United States to immigration from all over the world, and they have energetically worked to make alliances with these immigrant groups who are encouraged to hate White America and often adopt anti-White rhetoric almost as soon as they arrive because they can see the political advantages of doing so.

    Very true. What we’re seeing is open importation and indoctrination of our supposed executioners. This will – and should – get very ugly and the only way the white race survives it depends on our ability to see it for what it is – an unprecedented, global battle for our very existence.

    The (((plan))) is not “Brazilification” – it’s total extinction. Act accordingly.

  22. @Yukon Jack

    Men will never be free until the last king is strangled with the entrails of the last priest.
    Denis Diderot.

    FIFY

    What can one expect from people who revere the bible, AKA the goat herders guide to the universe.

    • Replies: @Dumbo
    , @BSmith
  23. @Gerhard57NL

    Religion is government and government is religion. They are the same thing.

    Throne and alter were twins–two vultures from the same egg.
    To attack the king was treason; to dispute the priest, blasphemy.
    The sword and cross were allies.
    Together they attacked the rights of men; they defended each other.
    The king owned the bodies of men, the priests the souls.
    One lived on taxes collected by force, the other on alms collected by fear.
    Both robbers, both beggars.
    The king made laws, the priest made creeds.
    With bowed backs the people carried the burdens of one, with open-mouthed wonder received the dogmas of the other.
    The king said rags and hovels for you, robes and palaces for me.
    The priest said God made you ignorant and immoral; He made me holy and wise; you are the sheep, I am the shepherd; your fleeces belong to me.
    You must not reason, you must not contradict, you must believe.
    Robert G. Ingersoll

    • Replies: @Gerhard57NL
  24. Moi says:
    @Anon

    Wherever [white] America brings its message of Jesus (god jr.), freedom and democracy, the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse soon follow.

  25. Jake says:

    Germanic Christian culture is the source of the desire for gotterdammerung, for total destruction.

    Charlemagne may have been anything but a book scholar but he grasped the essentials about not merely the individuals around him but, more important, about culture. In fashioning his vision of a Christian Empire of Western Europe, Charlemagne did not Germanize, he Latinized, or more specifically in broad linguistic terms, he Italo-Celticized. Latin would be the language of the Church still, and French, which is one of the many languages born of Latin overlaid politically and militarily on Celtic languages (both part of the same Indo-European branch), was to be the vernacular at the heart of the Christian Roman Empire.

    The great European enemy of all that Charlemagne hoped to accomplish was Saxon: Germanic in every cultural and linguistic sense.

    The Reformation revived that Germanic war against Christendom, and here we are.

    Charlemagne and Saxon/Germanic are on opposite sides of kulkturkampf. The latter has produced both the Nazis and the Anglo-Zionist Empire, both of which have been defined by absolute hatred of the vast majority of white peoples they see as not their version of Germanic/Saxon.

    • Agree: Seraphim
    • Replies: @ThreeCranes
  26. Jake says:
    @Layman

    You cannot overemphasize this quote:

    The Byzantine version of Christianity accepted Christians of every tribe (not just Greeks but Copts, Ethiops, Arabs, Armenians, Slavs etc.) The Western Christianity originally did so as well; only after the Germanic tribes took over the Roman Church did the tribal start to prevail over faith and corrupt the latter,

    Germanic is not the solution; Germanic/Saxon is the source of the problem.

    And just for a talking point because Jews are blamed as the one source of the decay, with Germanic peoples and culture the salvation: the first international language of Jews was Yiddish, which is a dialect of German. Now, the international language of Jews is English, which also is Germanic.

    What do Jews know that Giles Corey cannot fathom, perhaps cannot allow himself to imagine?

  27. It’s quite an accomplishment that the traditional hate-objects of Christianity manipulated their enemies into furthering their cause. Israelis are fully aware that Christian Zionism’s objective is the return of Jesus, who will then slaughter all the Jews. But the money of fools spends just as easily as that of the wise, and it’s all just a fairy tale anyhow. I don’t think there will be any peace in this world until some fanatic reduces Jerusalem to a radioactive hole in the ground, but even then a new cult of crater-worshippers will probably spring up.

  28. Iris says:
    @Wizard of Oz

    What a load of nonsense.

    Russia is a European country, of Christian culture and relatively modern social mindset, where women have enjoyed equivalent socio-economic rights and access to birth control for decades. However, pornography is not a flourishing industry in Russia, despite Russian women being arguably among the most beautiful in the world.

    I put it down to the fortunate lack of “Jewish entrepreneurship” and ensuing “liberal capitalism” in Russia. Ukraine, on the contrary, is going America’s way and for the same reasons.

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
  29. @Thomasina

    Thanks. There is one well known psychologist–last name Nemko–who has been speaking out on the impact of the white hating culture on white boys growing up. Only one that I know of in the whole country speaking out about this extremely obvious truism–and he’s Jewish.

    That’s how off-the-rails timid we are as a race. Blatant, in-your-face racial denigration, in a country in which we are the clear majority, hurting our own youth, and not a single well-known white Gentile psychologist in the whole country with the ‘nads to speak out. All soooo afraid of being called a hurty word.

    The SPLC hired a white Gentile psychologist as an expert witness against me. Dr. Bill Geis out of Kansas City. In his expert opinion, my effort was not viable. I’ve got a rebuttal ready that will blow him out of the water, but what a PoS. He knows, having looked into the program I was trying to start, that my program could very well have helped many where there is real suffering. He can look around and see the devastation occurring among our people. (That’s how timid we are–I know white guys who won’t say “our people” for fear of name-calling…no wonder we are losing.) He can see how unjust the SPLC attack was on me, yet he takes their money to help them destroy me so they don’t have to pay a cost for destroying a program meant to alleviate the effects destroying our people they’ve been so central to bringing about!

    • Replies: @Sick of Orcs
    , @Wild Geese
  30. “Until the twentieth century, Christianity served the West well. One need only think of the long history of Christians battling to prevent Muslims from establishing a caliphate throughout the West—Charles Martel at the Battle of Tours, the Spanish Reconquista, the defeat of the Turks at the gates of Vienna. The era of Western expansion was accomplished by Christian explorers and colonists. Until quite recently, the flourishing of science, technology, and art occurred entirely within a Christian context.”

    Christianity always serves followers well. The bad services is the result of the followers. You are of course off you mark if you think that christians are called to make war on anyone minus some threat and by any means of sword save by God’s word. That is the christian sword, in fact, if one actually reads scripture there’s an entire description of the battle armor and weapons of the believer and with whom the war is really with.

    Now I am not contending that christians were not entitled to defend their homes — but the crusades were a man made call.

    But anyone whop thinks that Jesus’ mandate was to roam about yanking out tongues, enslaving and murdering in his name simply has a very warped and incorrect understanding of who Christ was, what he accomplished and why.

  31. Dumbo says:
    @RoatanBill

    Men will never be free until the last king is strangled with the entrails of the last priest.
    Denis Diderot.

    Yeah, that French Revolution worked out very well, didn’t it?

    The commies in Russia (1917) and in Spain (1936) also liked to kill kings and priests. Maybe also torch churches and rape nuns.

    Man will NEVER be “free”, period. Or even understand what “freedom” means. Human nature will not change. Nor will nature in general. No matter what social changes you try to make.

    It’s foolish to think that “hey, let’s get rid of religion and of rich people and then everybody will be happy”. That’s John Lennon’s level thinking. It brings only chaos, or law of the jungle and the rule of the strongest.

    • Thanks: Parsnipitous
  32. The Christian White America’s enemies are clearly and resolutely delineated by the author … what are then people waiting for, the Second Coming of Christ?

  33. @Iris

    You might care to consider that the First Amendment does not help pornographers in Russia and also this
    https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2017/02/22/why-porn-will-never-die-in-russia-op-ed-a57249

  34. @RoatanBill

    Tes, excellently put and i totally agree. Religion is one of the oldest people management systems, to keep maases in check with when there were few law and policing aystwms in place yet. Religions also provide “answers” for basic human questions, like the reason for being, the moral compass of good and evil and the origins of all matter and life existing.

    Religion.was, at the same time, shaped to benefit a chosen few, like the “middle men” with claimed connections to the god. They appointed themselves to punish resistance and reward and “bless” obedience and favorable behavior.

    Islam and Old Testament Christanity are in fact based on the Talmud. I find it amusing that many followers bash each others’ brains in on account of religious differences, not knowing that they share the same base. I have always regarded the Talmud, the base of it all, as the oldest lobby for a claim on stolen land, just because a god “chose” a certain tribe and said that the claim was okay.

    • Replies: @TGD
  35. Seraphim says:
    @Yukon Jack

    That religion rather says that masturbation is bad for your health. It is not against sex as such, but against the very real ‘dirty sex’ which can be lethal. Not only that excess of sex weakens your precious ‘flesh’, but it transmits some nasty bugs (gonococci, spirochetes, HIV-transmitted by the ‘dirtiest’ sex-). ‘Nature’ is not that kind to her worshipers. Many of them were very sick people (physically and mentally, like Nietzsche). A visit to a morgue would dampen your enthusiasm for the ‘flesh’. A cesspool would do as well.

    • Agree: utu
  36. Seraphim says:
    @Franz

    Were not rather the Florentines?

    • Replies: @Franz
  37. anonymous[364] • Disclaimer says:
    @brabantian

    Islam as well is regarded as a Jewish creation, a religion of conquest also enshrining the ‘holy Jew’ at its centre…

    So, who are the “holy Jew,” which the muslims revere so much? Is that because our “caliphs” in SaudiA and UAE prostrate before the “holy Jew”? Lol!

    Jews will always be the implacable enemies of True Monotheism, and thus our enemies. True believers are not of those who prostrate before the “holy Jew.” Those are the Christian and Hindu pagans.

    We need to find our Western version of the meditation-yoga + warrior cultures of the Asian reincarnation religions,

    Lol! Yes, you need to find the batshit craziness of Hindoooism… and, some salient features of this “Asian reincarnation religion” …

    1. Vishnu raping a chaste woman, because he was impotent at vanquishing her demon husband, until she lost her chastity.

    2. Gay deities, Vishnu and Shiva copulating and producing a child.

    3. Worship of symbols of genitalia… the Lingam (phallus) and the Yoni (vagina).

    4. and, so on.

    You plucking idiot. 😀

  38. anonymous[364] • Disclaimer says:

    As for the entire essay, the lament of a pathetic Christian pagan, especially a whitevil supremacist one, it was sweet music to the ears. The Christian west has wrought untold suffering on billions of humans. May this spiritually cursed civilisation never know spiritual peace.

    As long as they cling to the pagan polytheist mangods-worship of Christianity, which is simply a plagiarisation of such abominations as the triple-deity of Hindooism, it will be impossible to attain that elusive spiritual peace.

    Little do y’all realise that no matter how much you analyse the branches of Christianity, and the malaise hidden within them, when the rottenness is in the trunk, there is little hope of its salvation.

    • Troll: Seraphim
    • Replies: @Suicidal_canadian
  39. Franz says:
    @Seraphim

    Were not rather the Florentines?

    They were in on it too.

    According to Joseph Farrell’s The Financial Vipers of Venice, it included the Medicis, Byzantine Greeks, and the whole shebang was put together by Marcilio Fincino who dropped Plato for the Hermetic texts for reasons Ferrell has some educated guesses about (Ferrell has a PhD in Patristics, and knows the Eastern traditions well.)

    • Replies: @Seraphim
  40. Seraphim says:
    @Franz

    Marsilio Ficino was a Florentine, the Medicis were Florentine, the Byzantine ‘Greeks’ brought their manuscripts of Hellenic philosophers to Florence. The Platonic Academy was in Florence. Ficino saw the ‘Platonic theology’ and the “Prisca Theologia’ as prophecies of Christianity. They were careful not to stray from Church orthodoxy. Ficino translated the works of Dionysus the Areopagite specifically to show that he influenced the Neo-Platonists and not the other way round. Ditto for the Christian Kabbalah of Pico della Mirandola.
    Venice, Padua, Bologna were bastions of Averroism, Jewish and Kabbalistic ‘studies’, barely veiled anti-Christian, that opened the ways of ‘modern science’. Giordano Bruno (who was a Napoletan) was a closet Kabbalist. The Christ has little place, if at all, in the ‘Nolana Philosophia’. Solomon instead had pride of place.
    There is no conflation between the two schools.

    • Thanks: Franz
  41. Correct about the heresy of Christian Zionism….and would you believe the head of CUFI, John Hagee, actually wrote that the Jews don’t have to accept Christ because Christ is NOT their Messiah?

    And as you claim the only true belief on Christ is European or White, are you British Israelist/Christian Identity, the most racist form of Christianity ever created by man (okay, except for Black Hebrew Israelites, who are just as racist)?

    And Orthodox Christianity, the original Christianity, even predating Roman or Roman Catholicism, is not true Christianity?

    Screw this denominationalism and man-made doctrinism…the hand (Christ), not the glove (religion).

    Christ, not religion! And Christ said to MAKE DISCIPLES OF ALL NATIONS! Oh, and that means Jews as well (which the One for Israel Ministry is doing in Israel, working with their fellow Palestinian Christians)!

  42. Anon[832] • Disclaimer says:
    @Franz

    Funilly were the knight templars with the sack of constantople in 1204 bringing with them the treasure of inmortal city to venice what would finance the whole process .

    aceleraing in the upcoming hundred years as tend thousands of bizantine schollars asented in venice and florence republic as the bizantine empire was being swaslowed by the otomans .

    In the year 1397 greece was tauch for the first time in venice again after nearly thousand years.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greek_scholars_in_the_Renaissance
    Irononically the reinasance happened in italy again in the only republic cities states that mantained their independence after the fall the western romans and were a fertil land of libery

    Templars , muslim , bizantines , italian republics ….what a beautiful history

    • Replies: @Franz
  43. gay troll says:

    Corey’s attitude is anti Christian. Christ says to love your enemy, help the foreigner, spare the adultress, and not to judge or speak out against the sins of another man. Christ says to turn the other cheek. Christ says the meek shall inherit the Earth. Those who live by the sword shall die by the sword. Christ commands you to love every person as you should love your neighbor. It is evident that Corey’s Medieval Germanic Adaptive Whateverthefuck contradicts the teachings of Christ entirely.

    It is true that Jesus Christ was a fictional anti Semite who said all these things while condemning the wicked generation of Jews in Jerusalem and whipping the money changers out of the temple. He calls them the offspring of their own adversary, Satan. He also performs crude conjurings and miracles. Suffice to say that while the teachings of Christ may be relevant, the doings of Christ are fictional propaganda. The evangelion of Jesus Christ as revealed in the Bible is a historical fraud; the Gospels were not first referenced until 130 CE, the life of Jesus Christ is not credibly attested to by any historical figure of the first century. His campaign through Galilee is a satire of Titus’ siege of Jerusalem as described by Josephus.

    The Jewish scriptures are also a fraud. There is no evidence that they existed before ~250 CE. They are an invention of Ptolemaic Egypt designed to lay claim to the promised land of Zion. In their original Greek, the savior of the Jews (Joshua) is named Jesus. The events they relate, from Genesis through Solomon’s kingdom and its fall, are unsupported by the archaeological record. By the year zero there were plenty of Jews in Jerusalem, but the Roman empire had displaced Ptolemaic rule and the “old” testament had to be countermanded by a new authority. Josephus describes how the Jews resisted Titus to the bitter end, culminating in the razing of the temple which was long seen as the fulfillment of Christ’s doomsday prophecies (see: Preterism).

    If the Bible had not preserved Jewish scriptures and centralized them in Western historical and ethical understanding it is unlikely Judaism would have any influence today. The Jews were destroyed by the Romans and from their ashes grew both Christianity and Talmudism. Although Christianity was designed to assert imperial Roman authority, it has a tendency to dissolve all power structures, whether due to its utter hypocrisy, or the unstoppable wisdom of universal love, I know not.

    • Agree: Kali
    • Troll: Seraphim
  44. geokat62 says:

    Here Corey discusses the role of Felix Untermeyer, a wealthy Jew, in promoting Scofield and his Bible.

    The correct given name is Samuel, not Felix.

  45. KenR says:

    Christians of yore had a pretty simple notion that heresy begins when you deny the divinity of Christ. And heresy was bad, for it not only endangered your soul but it endangered the entire community.

    A lot of energy went into weeding out heretics, establishing taboos and societal enforcements against heresies.

    All of these enterprises have evaporated over time. We’re in the Ecumenical Age, even the idea of heresy is thought to be horribly antiquated. It’s even thought to be backward and barbaric despite the fact that it was fundamental to forming the societies that went on to build Western Civilization.

    Anything goes now and you can’t criticize. Worse, you must clap. You must clap when Bruce Jenner falsely reveals himself to have been a female all along, and you must participate in that charade.

  46. In a way the previous posts illustrates why the US is going down fast and taking the West with it. The average reader of UR is likely to have had their eyes opened to the source of the corruption e.g. who controls the media, finance, One World Movement and the bought-paid for politicians.

    Surely at least you can organise the defence of your families and communities so that anarchic thugs think twice before they target you? If you who are armed are unwilling to defend the good from these evil mobs then what chance has any other country?

    Its better to rally round common interests rather than like here with old grudges raked up which have nothing to do with the immediate unfolding disaster. Look for common ground which unites against your common enemy and not for division which your enemy delights in.

  47. noname27 says: • Website
    @Yukon Jack

    White Europeans lost their identity with the conversion to Abramahic desert demon religion that has nothing to do with their own natural inspirations living in forests.

    I agree that White Europeans lost their identity to the satanic Babylonian Mystery Cult called Roman Catholicism, therefore, Roman Catholicism has nothing to do with Abraham or any of his descendants, including Yashua Messiah (Jesus Christ).

    In fact many of those White Europeans were Israelites (not Jews), in their migrations across Europe to The British Isles.

    The ‘Lost’ Tribes of Israel:
    https://www.minds.com/media/902249474722271232
    https://www.minds.com/media/902893671965282304
    https://www.minds.com/media/902905549734813696

    100 Proofs The Israelites were White:

  48. Dear Kevin Macdonald,

    as a traditional leftist, I read your book (“Individualism”) and thought there were things of value in there.

    But if you want to replace one romantic irrationality with another you have lost me and the legitimacy of your critique of critique. We don’t need a return to medieval ethics exemplified by Nibelungentreue and serfdom, which, by the way, is a lot like Islamic fundamentalist values.

    We need a return to modernity from postmodernity, with a rationlist, common sense humanism that realistically acknowledges human nature and the limits of dogoodery and the nefarious consequences of too much or the wrong version of it. Heeding majority opinion instead of elite opinion would already take care of most of the problems.
    The people we need to confront for this are not Jewish intellectuals or Protestants ethicists who have no power except the power the moneyed classes and their neoliberal propaganda outlets give them. You generally need to follow the money. Churches and large charity organizations in Germany profit from „refugees“ because they are economic actors who get state money for refugee housing and integration projects. For the moneyed classes in general, including the people who own real estate, a constant influx of poor immigrants means growth financed by normal taxpayers and a powerless exploitable working class.

    We need to counter elite „values“ that work well for the oligarchy but not for normal people with the political interests of normal people.
    We need common sense combined with charity (in the Christian and financial sense) in social work. One example: It’s not a good idea to father eight children when you have neither the money nor the mind to care for them; high financial incentives for voluntary sterilization of males with a criminal conviction is a humanist as well as probably effective measure one could try if not for elite taboos.

    One last thing. You seem to want civil war. I don’t. And like the Nibelungen, the brave Germanic knights you and your author seem to imagine will go bravely into their death, as they cannot win with the current constellations of power. Maybe you prefer a chilvalrous death to accepting defeat. But note that you, too, have then become an enemy of normal people who in their great majority don’t want war because it is they who will pay the price.

    • Replies: @Kali
  49. geokat62 says:
    @Craig Nelsen

    … she tells the author of a hit piece on me that appeared in her Hatewatch blog to “Go get him”.

  50. Franz says:
    @Anon

    Funilly were the knight templars with the sack of constantople in 1204 bringing with them the treasure of inmortal city to venice what would finance the whole process .

    Actually that’s the part Farrell (among others) sort of underline. Keeps us focused on the intrigues and wealth of Venice, which is why it stuck in my mind.

    Might also be PART of the reason that, a century after the Templar’s efforts, King Philip the Fair of France had them rounded up and executed or expelled.

    It’s also been noted that what the Templars did/didn’t do is still the subject of heated arguments today. Beware of scholars discussing this, they get emotional about it.

  51. dimples says:

    The only way Christianity could possibly be revitalized in toto is with the Second Coming. All other aspects of Christianity have been subsumed into the Nanny State. I think Jesus would be quite happy with this state of affairs in many respects. In many countries, the US being an exception, people get free health care, do not starve in the streets and the homeless are given shelter. In my opinion this is all Jesus was basically interested in. Income equality, racial equality, blah blah were political issues in which he was not interested.

    Jesus, a believer in the Law of Moses unmodified by Talmudic and Pharisaical interpretations and modifications, would be horrified to discover that homos have largely taken over the Christian priesthood. Probably he would expect that such corrupted perverts could not enter a Kingdom of Heaven which had no place for them, and would instead be subsumed by the cleansing fire.

    That said, in my opinion the most vital, in the sense of energetic, form of religion in today’s West is New Age, an eclectic form of gnosticism in which bits and pieces are taken from any and all religions and spiritual practices and glued together according to individual preference. So, barring the Second Coming after which all bets would be off, I would expect most of what is left of Christianity in its non-fundamentalist form to be incorporated into this.

    • Replies: @dimples
    , @Voltair
    , @Seraphim
  52. Jewish lawyers I’ve asked just flat out say no, and aren’t shy about saying it’s for ethnic reasons.

    That’s another lawsuit.

  53. @Craig Nelsen

    Marty Nemko. Posts at Psychology Today and reads his selfsame columns on youtube.

    Look for “The Jews are Going Extinct”

  54. BSmith says:
    @RoatanBill

    The khazars kvetch reading this. Oy vey

    Ps Diderot was a POS, Freemasonic trash.

  55. Z-man says:
    @Gerhard57NL

    You would expect Christian leaders to answer such threat with consolidation and fortification measures. But instead they weakened and divided their organization. The Vatican has been in bed with all sorts of powers and Reformed flavors of Christian churches are known for their many splinter factions.

    Ah there’s the pain. The ‘meat head’ practical leader of the American Catholic Church, Dolan of New York, can’t bend enough backwards for The Tribe, its sickening!

  56. Rich says:
    @Yukon Jack

    You are certainly entitled to your faith in the Anunakai theory, but “throwing people in ovens”? Do you really believe that ever happened, or is ever acceptable? Jesus is a complicated character, and if the New Testament is accurate, he called the Jews of his day “sons of Satan” and called for reforming their dietary laws as well as treating foreigners with respect. Not exactly strict adherence to the Torah. It was under a less altruistic Christianity that Western man had his greatest expansion, military success and scientific advancement. Now that Christianity has grown weak, Western man also appears weaker. I’m not sure throwing out the pan, water and/ or baby is the best way to go.

    I understand the difficulty in accepting resurrection, or miracles, even St Thomas the apostle refused to believe unless he could stick his finger through the holes in Jesus’ hand. But Christian morality, no children out of wedlock, obeying the law, honesty, etc. are good things that make for a healthy society.

    • Agree: coolhand850
    • Replies: @Kevin Barrett
  57. What is the agenda behind publishing this on the Unz Review? Ron himself has made it clear he despises Whites.

  58. wholy1 says:
    @Layman

    Hmmm, isn’t “Pride” not only one of the “Seven Deadly Sins”, but possibly the one most spiritually consequential?

  59. Akouo says:

    Refreshing reading but I must point out a basic mistake so many good writers and thinkers make which is, to belieive the conflation of the jews and the Hebrews. Over a period of a couple of centuries, the word Judahite in the Bible has been replaced by jew printers with the word jew but it doesn’t make it true.
    The jews come from the area between the Black and Caspian seas in southern Russia, they are not the middle eastern Hebrews of old. At the time of the New Testament they were known as khazars or scythians. They were converted to the pharisees cult straight from Babylon hundreds of years after the Hebrews had been eradicated by the Romans( in AD70) in fact the very last Hebrews took their own lives at Masada. There are no ‘lost tribes’ they are all gone.
    These jews are a new thing relatively speaking and even though they adopted in a loose way the old testament writings, the” torah” they compiled their own ‘faith book’ the “talmud” during the middle ages, based on their teachings from Babylon. It is NOT a book about God. Their language is germanic in origin and called yiddish hence the term yid. Speaking Hebrew is an affectation, like a schoolboy attempting Latin, neither really knows how it sounds as both languages were dead for centuries and both are simply guessing.
    So stop calling them Christ killers, they are not. Devil worshipping parasites and a cancer upon the world they are.

  60. @Craig Nelsen

    Thanks and absolutely correct! Yes take the battle to Court, and teach others to do the same. Until this hate speech is actually stopped, as your case can set the legal precedent, then genocide and slavery is the outcome.

    As a friend still living in the city used to tell so called patriots hyper fixated on their guns, is that they have been taken over without the enemy having to firing a shot….and recalling the elderly Jewish Communist lady in the neighborhood who would burn the midnight oil incessantly studying, studying studying….something that has been systematically attacked amongst the sports addicted idiots whose children now burn down America for privileged guilt of being cattle just like the blacks….

    Civilization chance is the civics of Civil battle that overturns the hypocritical professional inciters of hate as you are thankfully acting.

    God Speed!

  61. @Rich

    Kevin MacDonald is right and his race-worshipping Darwin-worshipping anti-Christian critics are wrong. Rising civilizations are organized around a higher ideal that demands sacrificing the lower self in service to transcendence. When the intoxication of that higher ideal starts to wear off, the lower self (mere biology and base desire) increasingly re-asserts itself, and mimetic desire inevitably produces a Hobbesian war of all against all, leading to decline and collapse. The USA and the West are undergoing that process now, thanks to the controlled demolition of Christianity by a certain segment of the Western elite.

    If you want to turn the process around and revitalize Western civilization, your only hope is to revitalize Christianity (or better yet Islam, which is rational and corrected Christianity). Pushing narcissistic worship of one’s own race, conceived within a biological/Darwinian framework, will only accelerate the collapse, because it cannot offer any ideal or means of transcendence.

    Islam, unlike the varieties of Christianity that I have observed and participated in, has efficacious rituals that tend to produce a degree of transcendence (or “religious experience”) in nearly everyone who practices them. That’s the first among many reasons why I, like Murad Hoffman and Roger Garaudy among so many others, expect that the rebirth of Western Christianity will happen through Islam—which, once again, is a rational and corrected interpretation of Christianity.

    Don’t forget that the same folks who took down Christianity —call them the forces of Antichrist—are fighting an even more furious ideological and military war against Islam.

  62. @Franz

    No, Hermeticism was not that important in transformation of European societies. It influenced various magi, from Pico to Bruno and Fludd & others, but its central message was about mystic illumination- not anything to do with progress, innovation, discovery,…

    Actually, there was not a single force or cultural current that changed Europe from 1400 to 1700.

    • Replies: @Franz
  63. @Icy Blast

    You expect from modern Americans to know something about history?

    • Troll: Ann Nonny Mouse
  64. TGD says:

    If the professor had been born with a name like Helmut Ziegenfuß (more reflective of his Germanic heritage and supremicism) instead of the beautiful Celtic name, Kevin MacDonald, how high do you think his star would have risen?

  65. Anonymous[208] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anon

    Oy vey! The goyim know! Shut it down!

  66. Shaman911 says:

    Organized religions everywhere and throughout time are all complete bullshit. They’ve been created to hide the Aliens who are running the planet.

  67. Anon[296] • Disclaimer says:

    Is the Sword of Christ the Sword used to forcefully convert ancient Europeans, who knew better?

    To a Semitic sourced cult that few people know the actual meanings of?

    Christianity is the deepest of cults. Its deeper than any “Wiccan” or “Satanic” nonsense dreamt up by authors and screenwriters.

    Part of that magic is that it is not seen as such because we are so deeply steeped in it that we overlook it as boring, straight laced, and something to cast aside as an intellectual plaything in favor of more perceptibly stimulating focuses.

    You don’t know the meaning of its symbolism, traditional “sacraments”, or really of any part of it.

    Christianity is innately tied up in Jewry. It is innately tied up in human sacrifice, cannibalism, the symbol of the Edenic serpent, and cuckoldry by what is implied to be the Jewish forefather / god.

    Why would it be recommended?

    Jewish religion is part mass hypnosis and illusion for non-Jews, and part genocidal political strategy against non-Jews.

    Which is probably why the smartest North Germans, or Suebi, were the most difficult tribe for the Romans, the most difficult to covert to Christianity, are the most atheistic European tribe today, and were who developed the modern industrial State that Britain sought to copy (and whose economic ethnographer was Marx).

    Until you reject the World’s cultic cocoon, in full, you will be rid of none of its evil and be perplexed as to why our leaders are fomenting murderous revolution against the state that they lead. You will be perplexed as they condone the conditions that will later lead to mass genocide.

    • Disagree: Iris
    • Replies: @Mefobills
    , @Derer
  68. Agent76 says:

    Jul 30, 2020 Lauren Daigle – A Few Words About Kindness

    If you ever have the opportunity to just hold somebody’s hand, go and do it. Kindness is never something you need to look back on with regret.

  69. Mefobills says:

    The new God is Mammon. The new god has supplanted Christianity. Economics used to be called political economy, which also includes religion.

    Jesus was a monetary reformer who started his mission on the Jubilee year, and aimed his wrath at the Pharisee “creditor class.” Jesus specifically told them that they love money.

    Finance Capitalism wants to turn everything into a monetary price. So, this radical liberal mammon religion destroys tradition, family and everything in its path that cannot be monetized. It would put a price on the air if it could. The entire earth is to be harvested into money prices.

    What it means to be male or female is now being monetized into non-binary, and all the drugs (drugs at a price) that it takes to do sex conversion.

    Families and nations are broken down so that a population becomes compliant workers, who are disconnected from their race, tribe, borders, language, and culture.

    Mammonism, Liberalism, and finance capital all come together at a globo-homo nexus, which is where the West now finds itself.

    Christianity actually does have the testicles to deal with mammonism and liberalism, and other toxic jewish constructs.

    Of all the religions, Christianity is the most robust against mammon and the jew. The problem is that Christian religion has been perverted beyond its meaning, especially by changing the meaning of words.

    It is much easier to push a ball down hill in a way it wants to go, and a revitalized Christianity does go the way we want it to go. Christians sitting in their pews every Sunday are not aware that SIN is not sexual sin, but instead debt-sin.

    Also, nowhere does Christianity say it is OK to immigrate millions of strange tribes into your country. A tower of babel is specifically warned against. Globo-homo imports labor to lower prices and create new debtors, which is a biblical sin.

    Christianity since it is inverted, says that we should have compassion for invaders, and by golly if we are in debt, then we should pay our Creditors, even if the creditors are (((thieves))).

    Inverted Christianity, since it has inverted sin, also says that white people should give it up, and go out of existence.

    The big bang event of 1694 should help concentrate minds. That event informs today, and also the perversion that is Judeo-Christianity (not real Christianity).

    1) Amsterdam’s Jews printed bibles emphasizing old testament and overturning supersession. This was the forerunner to Scofield, with the objective of new narrative make Jews as special people. It was finance capital derived from stock market gains in Amsterdam, that funded the operation.
    2) Further stock market capital from Amsterdam funded the Orange King (first color ) revolution, and also funded Cromwell. The objective was to break down a Kingship hierarchy and insert Jewish finance capital.
    3) The first stock owned debt spreading bank, the BOE in 1694.
    4) BOE merges with East India Company. Companies become perpetual and have more rights than god-derived humans
    5) Both bank stock and company stocks are on-sold into markets, making markets a new mammon god.

    Here is the template for undoing the big-bang, which in turn undoes Mammonism (Jewish method) and liberalism.

    1) Sovereign money. It is a law change and can be done over night. Until the money power is fixed, nothing can be done.
    https://sovereignmoney.site/

    Or state banking. State banks are a way to do thing piece-meal, as getting a law change through Congress is unlikely given how Congress Critters are bought off puppets of the money power.

    2) Start now with re-teaching in Seminary Schools. The version of Christianity we have today, is not that of Jesus.

    https://michael-hudson.com/2017/12/he-died-for-our-debt-not-our-sins/

    3) People who work for companies own the voting stock, not finance capital. There would have to be different classes of stock, to then undo the stock capital system that originated in Amsterdam. (It was 700 unlicensed Sephardic Jews in Amsterdam who invented the modern stock system)

    4) I would jettison democracy, or at least universal suffrage democracy. Finance Capital specifically went after Kingship, to then insert itself as the new king. The Devil Hides in plain sight, by inverting the fabric of reality.

    How often do you think about money and scrambling for survival, rather than pondering on the higher things that make us human?

    The people in the upper middle ages in England under the Talley Stick System, actually had more free time than modern debt slaves. They also built Cathedrals with volunteer labor, and a labor of love.

    http://studimonetari.org/articoli/lifewithoutusury.html

    In the middle of the 19th Century, Oxford Professor of Political History, Thorold Rogers wrote of that era: “At that time a labourer could provide all the necessities for his family for a year by working fourteen weeks.” The other thirty-eight weeks were his to do as he pleased. Would you like to earn all of the money required to feed, shelter, clothe and recreate your family for a year by working fourteen weeks? What would you do with thirty-eight weeks of vacation per year?

    Many parts of Europe were so prosperous during the Middle Ages that hundreds of communities averaged 160 to 180 holidays a year. None were bank holidays. The people worked for themselves, learned new skills, studied, went hunting or fishing, and many volunteered their skills and trades for building those magnificent cathedrals. Lord Liverhume, writing the century before Thorold Rogers said : “The men of the 15th Century were very well paid.”

    Modern Man has Scales in his eyes.

  70. It might be useful to understand that Churchianity (the prevailing modern church era) is NOT Christianity. The difference?
    Start here – https://crushlimbraw.blogspot.com/2018/07/note-to-mentors-when-watchman-falls.html?m=0 – just one item from a word search on Churchianity in DaLimbraw Library.
    This is not an easy ’25 words or less’ exercise – it has been a process for me for over half my lifetime – and continues to this day.
    Just some things I have learned – prove all things; Christian maturity does not come from pabulum dispensed from pulpits; if you want to understand who Jesus was and is, read the 4 Gospels – He’s not the caricature created by Churchianity; in order to destroy Western Civilization which was often called Christendom, the corruption of the faith had to begin in the church itself – mission accomplished; but there will ALWAYS be a remnant to pick up the pieces after the fall! Jesus has not failed – we’re just a bit slow catching on.
    Finally, my website and DaLimbraw Library are not designed for casual readers – but they’re certainly welcome – and might even become researchers themselves.
    The fields are ripe, but the workers few!

  71. Mefobills says:
    @Kevin Barrett

    Islam will require even more reform than Christianity, especially with Islam’s tenets of abrogation.

    Super-session in Christianity means that New Testament and Jesus is predominant, while Abrogation allows Islam’s more violent post-Medina constructs to have too much weight.

    Globo-Homo had practically no difficulty creating Takfiris, as it was easy enough to dupe them with valid abrogation type verses. Globo Homo gives the Wahabbist Takfiris a little money, quotes some valid verses, and then points them at their enemy. Syria with the “good vs bad” terrorists was globo homo in action. Takfiris were mercenary ground troops, while globo homo ran air cover.

    In other words, the Wahhabists and Takfiris are doctrinal aligned with Islam more so, than say Suffis.

    Christian reform will mean a new Bible with footnotes explaining the real nature of Sin (Sin is actually debt related), and also what the Logos is.

    To rip abrogation out of Islam … I doubt that can be done.

    • Replies: @Kevin Barrett
  72. MrVoid says:

    I’ve got great respect with K.M. but really this is old fuddy duddy stuff. He’s simply out of touch with the younger White conservative crowd. Most White conservatives who have left Christianity (and there are a lot of us) will never return. That’s not out of spite. It’s mainly because we moved on and found other things that we now prefer. We need to be respectful of all religions, excepting Judaism and socially pernicious things like Satanism. Obviously accommodation with Judaism is not possible because of its inbuilt tendency toward hostility, but we should not be hostile toward Islam. I have had many positive real-world interactions with Muslisms.

    • Replies: @Iris
    , @Kali
  73. Derer says:
    @Anon

    I agree, if you referring to desperate suppression of antisemitism “a complete larp” or “an internet fantasy”. I always thought it has been a metaphysical banality or useful idiocy.

  74. Derer says:
    @Yukon Jack

    Christianity needs to be thrown out – the baby, the bathwater, and the pan.

    It was tried before.

    David R. Francis US ambassador to Russia sent a dispatch to Washington in Jan. 1918:

    “The Bolshevik leaders here, most of whom are Jews and 90% of whom are returned exiles, care little for Russia or any other country but are internationalists and they are trying to start a worldwide social revolution.”

    That created Hitler and Jewish exodus to a new land across the ocean. After few decades the kibbutz doctrine has mellowed down and transformed into a more sophisticated yoke. How it will end we are not sure yet. An ambassador will report “the journey is reckless but something is brewing”.

  75. Larry says:

    All this race talk is counterproductive.

    • Agree: Iris
  76. Mefobills says:
    @Anon

    Christianity is innately tied up in Jewry. It is innately tied up in human sacrifice, cannibalism, the symbol of the Edenic serpent, and cuckoldry by what is implied to be the Jewish forefather / god.

    Christ put a stop to burnt offerings, overcame Jewish dietary laws (which were forcing the population into a Kritarchy of legal compliance), and took on the Pharisee creditor class.

    Christ changed the nature of old testament god to something else – actually a new god in my opinion. Jesus was in alignment with Western Cro-Magnon racial sensibilities, especially in how to treat women.

    Jesus was returning civilization to balance. The populations of that day were locked down with a creditor oligarchy, similar to today. Jesus started his mission on the Jubilee year, to return to the tradition of debt relief, exactly what is needed today.

    What sort of figure could arrive on the scene now, to make you change how you eat?

    It is only after Judeo-Christian deception, beginning with Jewish funded Cromwell, that makes your points valid. Even so, it would be hard to get a Judeo-Christian to do a burnt offering today, but I wouldn’t put it past pastor John Hagee, or another Zionist Christian Judaiser to find some way to do it.

    • Replies: @anarchyst
  77. Iris says:
    @MrVoid

    You raise a critically important question: can Western people reverse back on what they believe they have learnt, namely that modern science is antithetical to the belief in God?

    The main reason why Western people were driven away from Christianity is the way certain scientific breakthroughs , such as the Big Bang or the Theory of Evolution, are presented as alleged proofs that monotheist Scriptures are nothing but fables.

    This is done by design by the domineering Western ideology: eradicating religion is indispensable to promote individualism, mercantilism and isolation, the PTB’s dream world order.

    Can this state of things be reversed in the post-modern West? Looking at the course world affairs are taking, we are bound to go through determining historic shocks and will have to, either find collective ways to change and adapt, or disappear as national civilisations.

    There exist no civilisation without religion.

    • Replies: @MrVoid
  78. Iris: “You raise a critically important question: can Western people reverse back on what they believe they have learnt, namely that modern science is antithetical to the belief in God?”

    Science denies the existence of any supernatural explanation for events. It proceeds, and must proceed, on the belief that all phenomena can be understood without reference to anything supernatural at all. Thus, belief in God (lol, which one?) is antithetical to science.

  79. MrVoid says:
    @Iris

    The main reason why Western people were driven away from Christianity is the way certain scientific breakthroughs , such as the Big Bang or the Theory of Evolution, are presented as alleged proofs that monotheist Scriptures are nothing but fables.

    That stuff is a definite chink in the armour, and I think its a strong reason why ex-Christians don’t consider returning, but not the primary reason for the initial exit. The main for Christians exiting the church is because the church is no longer relevant to them socially or politically. It used to be at the centre of people’s lives, but now that church’s have become fully Marxist, they don’t offer anything that can’t be had elsewhere. The internal transformation of the churches was usually effected in the name of relevance, but the effect has been the opposite, and it was more a case of the clergy wanting to be relevant to the establishment then wanting the church to be relevant to its votaries. The clergy killed the church hoping to become the pet curs of the establishment even though the establishment has nothing but contempt for them anyway.

    I myself became a Buddhist. I consider Buddhist cosmology to be more complete and satisfying then Christian cosmology. I don’t have to worry about why a purely good god would create evil or conditions for evil, such as free will. That some people are genetically inclined to sociopathic behaviour isn’t a problem in Buddhism. In Buddhism that’s just how karma works itself out. In Christianity, if science explains some sociopathic human behaviour in a way that is exclusive of free will, Christians have a problem that no theological treatise can solve. The problem becomes serious when we have whole population groups that are sociopathic relative to the White norm.

    • Thanks: Iris
    • Replies: @SeekerofthePresence
  80. aandrews says:

    An aperitif: https://youtu.be/MLL39RT46Pg?t=865 (“Israel is the center of the earth.”)

  81. American Citizen 2.0 says:
    @UncommonGround

    White people never really conformed to Christianity in most aspects of life but there is a feeling that at some point in the past we had an overtly Christian culture that made a big impact in terms of moral behavior. I don’t think it’s really true. Seems like various religious sects promoted the idea that everyone was Christian and got a lot of buy in sometimes.

    People in America are never going to go back to the “Footloose” world where dancing is shameful and girls wear skirts and suchlike. That Footloose Christian world only ever existed for a few years in small towns and even then most people rebelled against it and drank and had sex and so on and so forth.

    • Replies: @anon
  82. Rich says:
    @Kevin Barrett

    My biggest problem with Islam, which may not be the same as others, is their circumcision requirement. This bizarre mutilation of male genitals seems like it should be relegated to the primitive past. I don’t believe they will ever be able to move past this archaic practice.

    • Agree: anarchyst
  83. vot tak says:

    So giles corey is one of israel’s psywar tools…good to know.

    • Replies: @Kali
  84. Iris says:
    @Dr. Robert Morgan

    Thus, belief in God (lol, which one?) is antithetical to science.

    No, it is not. Real science is far from being able to explain everything and does not even pretend to.

    What you see as “supernatural” phenomenons in monotheist Scriptures can also be interpreted as symbolic allegories, a pedagogic way to transmit a message simple enough to be understood by human civilizations in their infancy.
    Adam, Eve and the garden of Eden are not a lie, but a two thousand year-old answer, adapted to the knowledge of the time, and provided to the eternal human questioning about cosmogony and eschatology.

    As far back as one goes into the existence of the various human species, including our proto-human ancestors, one finds that the two constant, innate, immaterial preoccupations of humankind were beauty and religion: main archaeological findings from human prehistory are rock paintings and burial sites.

    This debate is not even new. As early as the 11th Century, foremost Muslim Persian philosopher and jurist Abu Hamid Al Ghazali (1058-1111) had already understood and explained that the realms of faith and science were two separate worlds, which paths neither justify nor negate each other.
    This is just another issue where Western mercantilism disguises itself, this time under the pretence of scientific rationality.

  85. @Dr. Robert Morgan

    Science denies the existence of any supernatural explanation for events. It proceeds, and must proceed, on the belief that all phenomena can be understood without reference to anything supernatural at all. Thus, belief in God (lol, which one?) is antithetical to science.

    Tautology.

    • Agree: mark green
  86. anon[327] • Disclaimer says:
    @American Citizen 2.0

    A few did.
    They cried, asked for forgiveness,
    became very decent adults.

    • Replies: @American Citizen 2.0
  87. @MrVoid

    I myself became a Buddhist. I consider Buddhist cosmology to be more complete and satisfying then Christian cosmology.

    Is God not above cosmology?

  88. Art says:
    @mark green

    Your comment against Christianity is a Jew wet dream. Europeans selling out their Christian Western heritage has the rabbis dancing and the Jew oligarchs singing on the way to their banks.

    The success of Western culture is dependent on Christianity. It is the idealism and cooperativeness of Christianity that has melded and forged Europe’s success. Tribalness is the bane of humanity. We have brains – Jesus asks us to use our brains to love our neighbors. In successful America for the most part, “We the People” were mixed cooperative neighbors from many different tribes.

    The Jews are convincing America to re-tribalize. And the result is that we are daily going further and deeper into a cultural toilet.

    Would it not be wise to defend what make us successful – and not agree with our Jew enemies?

    • Thanks: Pheasant
    • Replies: @mark green
    , @geokat62
    , @anon
  89. @Rich

    My biggest problem with Islam, which may not be the same as others, is their circumcision requirement. This bizarre mutilation of male genitals seems like it should be relegated to the primitive past. I don’t believe they will ever be able to move past this archaic practice.

    Then you should also have a problem with Judaism….males circumcised after birth by Rabbi. The practice involves Rabbi placing mouth on boys foreskin to suck up the blood:

    https://www.haaretz.com/jewish/.premium-what-is-oral-suction-circumcision-1.5311796

    • Agree: Rich
  90. gay troll says:

    People who cling to Christian theology (and its putative intersection with Jewish history) while ignoring the sayings of Christ are the most deceived, disregarding the scant truth of the Bible for its voluminous pack of lies. Christ’s teachings are liberal, in direct opposition to Jewish chauvinism, and through humanism the ethics of Christ have passed into secular thought in the form of feminism, multiculturalism, and tolerance. The poor fools wailing about how the Jews have corrupted traditional religious culture with liberalism should reconsider. Only one Jew did that. And his name was Jesus. To “adapt” Christianity to white nationalism is really to revert to the tribal ideals of the Pentateuch. Christ left us with one commandment: to love everyone on Earth.

    I will tell you why the teachings of Christ are valid, in case you are ignorant. They are valid because they recognize the truth that whatever you do to another, you do also to yourself. This is because ultimately there is only One self who illuminates all living beings. It is equivalent to the Hindu knowledge that there is only one self, existing both within us and without us. It is the basis for the laws of karma and reincarnation. It is the basis for the articulation of the equal rights of man. The spirit of Christ lives in the heart of all people; the notion that Christ only incarnated once is a terrible blasphemy. Christ is a beautiful spirit, and the New Testament was his/her prison. But no longer.

    It would serve us well to keep in mind that the teachings of Christ are literally satanic. That is, they are adversarial to Jewish values and the worldly ambitions of Yahweh. The Jews did not believe in any devil (other than Yahweh) and the Christian concept of “Satan” as “The Devil” is deeply problematic. I read some comment on here earlier remarking on the great intelligence and power of the devil. Hello, intelligence and power belong to God alone; that is why unitheism holds God to be omniscient and omnipotent. If you sense a powerful, intelligent, incorporeal presence beside you, you may have been taught that it is evil. But in fact, this presence is the true Christ of God, the morning star and light bearer, the goddess of love, Lucifer.

    Lucifer is the means by which God represents itself to human beings. The idea that God came to men only once, in one specific body, in order to die, is a lie.

    Namaste 666

    • Agree: Kali
    • Thanks: Polemos
  91. Art says:
    @Dr. Robert Morgan

    Science denies the existence of any supernatural explanation for events. It proceeds, and must proceed, on the belief that all phenomena can be understood without reference to anything supernatural at all. Thus, belief in God (lol, which one?) is antithetical to science.

    Not so. Our mind rebels at the notion that there is beginning and yet no cause – it just does not make sense that there was a beginning without a cause.

    What harm is it to call the cause of the universe – God?

    p.s. All of science points to a beginning.

  92. Wild Geese says: • Website
    @Craig Nelsen

    An important question would be whether her group classifies all whites within one broad category, which I am sure that they do. A follow up would be if they group all non-whites within a broad category as well. Of course, they don’t. Then ask if they breakdown “whites” into separate categories such as country of origin or ethnic-national origin. They don’t. Ask her if she would consider the historical experience of each of those groups, Irish Catholic, Scots-Irish, German, Swede, Anglo, French, Portuguese, etc., in their homeland and in coming here to be the same? Clearly, they were very different experiences, so why break one group down to the smallest racial group (non-whites), yet keep whites in the broadest group?

  93. vot tak says:
    @Kevin Barrett

    “his race-worshipping Darwin-worshipping”

    The promotion of white supremacy by mcdonald is his israeli psywar job. Darwin has zero mix in his hasbara. Zero. The guy is an israeli asset. Has been from day one of his “professional career” of promoting likudite white supremacism among the subservient zombie goy herd.

    • Disagree: Pheasant
  94. @Jake

    Germans don’t “desire” Gotterdamerung, they see it as a phase of a Great Cycle.

    After the final battle, after the downfall of all the Gods, after the cataclysm, the seeming end of all and everything, one small blade of grass pops up through the chaos and the cycle begins anew.

    Not really that far off if we are looking at the life cycle of a star, or, for a more worldly example, the Deluge of 12,000 B.C. when the ice age ended and waters rose 400′ world wide, drowning all civilization that dwelt along the coasts.

    And by the way, the Germanic people have contributed more to the peace of mind and material comfort of mankind than any other. And that by a long shot. The Jew’s impact has been minimal–that is if we confine our discussion to benefits.

    • Thanks: Pheasant
  95. Anonymous[339] • Disclaimer says:

    OK, I’ve been saying for some time that the West is due a complete re-organization, one as large as that of the 1648 Treaty of Westphalia, which jettisoned most of medieval social, theological, and political theory. Instead, it put in a bare bones theory that denied the primacy of religion and was intended only to stop the conflict that had almost destroyed Western Europe. The West needs something similar now.

    And it looks like Kevin MacDonald believes that Giles Corey has found something that would serve, and has described it in Sword of Christ. Could well be that K. MacDonald (KM) is correct in this — KM’s description looks like just the sort of bare bones theory that could let Westerners do what they have to do to survive, and to sleep at night, hold their family together, raise kids, invent things, cooperate, work . . . you get the picture.

    I’ll order the book.

    A revolution in thought so great as G. Corey apparently proposes would be impossible short of a complete system shutdown and reorganization. Everything would have to stop working and have to be re-built, more or less from the ground up. That includes intellectual systems. Millions/billions would have to die during this process, simply from starvation, exposure, various massacres, and the occasional war consequent to the halt of trade and the associated loss of economic efficiency.

    Fortunately or otherwise, we have a complete system shutdown and reorganization coming right up, and it’s one that can’t be blamed on G. Corey. In 30 years, G. Corey’s way of thinking (or a descendant of it with a few peripheral changes) could be the dominant one. If not G. Corey’s way, something very similar.

    • Replies: @Suicidal_canadian
  96. Anon-og says:

    The comment section at Unz is a treasure truly.

  97. Iris: “Real science is far from being able to explain everything and does not even pretend to.”

    Science doesn’t have all the answers yet. But it also isn’t content just to say, in explaining why something happened, “Because it’s the will of God.” Religion does that, but not science. That’s the key difference. The scientific attitude assumes, and must assume, that a rational, mechanistic explanation for any phenomenon in terms of cause and effect is possible. If effects follow causes only according to the caprice of some imaginary being, science can’t even begin. Hence, the scientific attitude, a necessary precondition for science to exist, is incompatible with religious belief. Conversely, if we actually take seriously the idea that such an entity as God exists, then science is jeopardized, since one could never be sure that a given effect would follow from a given cause. God might intervene, and there could be no rational explanation. In asserting that the universe is a rational place that can be completely understood in terms of cause and effect, it would even be fair to say that science is man’s ongoing project to abolish God.

    Art: “Our mind rebels at the notion that there is beginning and yet no cause – it just does not make sense that there was a beginning without a cause. What harm is it to call the cause of the universe – God?”

    The question is whether that cause is understandable or not; regular, repeatable, mechanistic. If the cause is a supernatural entity that stands separate from its creation and has a will of its own, and the universe he created is one in which he can intervene at any time — the usual Christian definition of God — then the universe isn’t actually a rational place. In fact, the more he intervenes with miracles, the less rational it becomes. Otoh, if God never intervenes, or can’t, he becomes an unnecessary hypothesis. We’re still waiting for religion to provide science with irrefutable proof of a miracle, which would go a long way towards proving the existence of God. So far, it hasn’t happened. I for one am not expecting that to change.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  98. dimples says:
    @Kevin Barrett

    Mr Barrett is correct that Islam will replace Christianity, not for any reason of ‘rational’ bwahahahaha supremacy but simply because of enforced migration. This will result in the revitalization of Islam, not Western Civilization, which will simply disappear into the New Muslim Dark Age. I sometimes think that this is why Notre Dame cathedral set itself on fire. The old church needed a complete rebuild while it was still possible in order to survive the next thousand years of back to the medieval future.

    When Islam takes over as the state religion of the West during the 21st century, due to population replacement alone, the forces of the Anti-Christ will simply be subsumed by Islam, no worries there.

    • Agree: Pheasant
    • Replies: @Kevin Barrett
  99. dimples says:
    @dimples

    Well if nobody is going to comment on my masterpiece, I will. The choice of the phrase ‘Nanny State’ was unfortunate. It is the Welfare State which embodies Christian principles. Jesus of course would have hated the Nanny State which is effectively the Pharisaical bureaucratic mission creep version of the Welfare State.

  100. @Art

    Hi Art. I come from a Christian background. Unfortunately, I see a world where Christians are being manipulated easily and controlled by Jews. Part of it comes from the Christian attachment to the Jew-centric Old Testament, Christ’s holy Jewish pedigree, as well as the common Christian view that Jews are ‘God’s Chosen People’. Christianity is replete with self-defeating fantasies.

    Christianity puts Christians in a subordinate relationship with Jews. Jews on the other hand, indulge no such self-demeaning fantasies. We must break free. We must find a new way.

    • Agree: MrVoid
    • Replies: @Art
  101. Art says:

    Is Southern Christian Zionism related to White Southern racism? Do they see Blacks like the Jews see Palestinians? Do they want racial purity like the Israelis do? Do Southerners see Jews as brothers in their desire for racial purity?

    Both Southerners and Jews have greatly abused their minorities. They have to hate them – it is human nature.

    “It is a principal of human nature to hate those whom we have injured.” — Gaius Cornelius Tacitus

    • Replies: @Alden
  102. KenH says:

    We say that Christianity has been infiltrated and misdirected but another school of thought says that the weak, flabby, apologetic and love thy black and brown man Christianity that we see today is merely returning to its universalist roots.

    Contemporary Christianity has become a mortal enemy of white racial survival and with few exceptions is leading us into the graveyard and dustbin of history. It encourages miscegenation with alien and inferior races which will usher in a new dark age. Whenever and wherever there is conflict Christian leaders takes the side of those opposing the white race or at best remain neutral.

    White Christians have been some of the biggest opponents of pro-white identity politics. Conversely, black Christians and churches practice and preach pro-black identity politics.

    At a time when whites are being attacked from all quarters Christianity stands by and offers us very little. This amounts to unilateral disarmament.

    I suppose a muscular and racialized Christianity would help but I also think an increasing number of whites are simply outgrowing Christianity and need something else whether that be a return to paganism, deism, agnosticism, atheism or cosmotheism.

  103. @Anon

    Another Jew who doesn’t like their own history and data?

  104. geokat62 says:
    @Art

    Would it not be wise to defend what make us successful – and not agree with our Jew enemies?

    Given that Jews are a vanishingly small ethnic group in relation to the goys that make up the rest of the global population, the Jew has come to realize that he cannot win an ethnic war against the goyim, if it is fought directly. Instead, he has worked exceedingly hard trying to convince the dumb goyim that the conflict should be fought along different battle lines… first it was class warfare then it transitioned to political correctness.

    They have work hard trying to convince the dumb goyim that a country is simply composed of its citizens regardless of their ethnic identity. This is why the ADL first coined the Big Lie that Diversity Is A Strength. They’ve been working hard to implement this lie across all of the countries that comprise the West. Soon after WWII, Jewish Supremacist Organizations (JSOs) developed a response to the fascist regimes that were created as a defensive mechanism against the Bolshevik poison unleashed in their societies: ethno-nationalist entities in the West must be destroyed. In their effort to achieve their goal of Never Again!, they developed the following formulation:

    ethno-nationalism = fascism = genocide

    That’s why England, France, Germany. Sweden. etc., etc., are no longer permitted to identify as ethnic nations. The best they can do is to identify as civic-nationalist countries, where all that is required to be a member of a nation is a piece of paper.

    This new vision of civic-nationalism was best articulated in a speech recently delivered by Charlie Kirk (of TPUSA) in Jerusalem:

    I have loyalty to ideas. Of course I love the Grand Canyon. I love the Rocky Mountains. And I love Boston. And I love Chicago. But if all that disappeared, if all I had was ideas, and we were on an island, that’s America. That’s Israel. And that’s what people have to realize. America’s just a placeholder for timeless ideas. And if you fall too in love with, oh, the specific place, and all this…that’s not what it is. Israel being the exception, because there is a holy connection to this land.

    https://www.informationliberation.com/?id=60357

    Notice how the Zionist project is exempt from this civic-nationalist construction? Walls and DNA tests are permitted for the Jewish state, but open borders are mandatory for the West!

    This is why JSOs pushed so hard for Hart-Celler in America in 1965 and why they’ve pushed so hard for open borders for Western Europe.

    Ask yourself something, Art. Do you think America was a stronger country before or after 1965? The truth of the matter is diversity is not a strength, it is an obvious weakness and if the West doesn’t wake up quickly enough to realize this lie, they will end up losing their own heritage that their ancestors worked so hard to bequeath to them.

    Without ethno-nationalism, the world will fall to JSO’s GloboHomo dystopian nightmare. That’s why it is incumbent upon us to do everything in our power to avert this Jewish wet dream… and to restore our Western homelands to the ethno-nationalist countries they once were.

    • Replies: @Art
  105. @Icy Blast

    Why do we see these endless unprovoked attacks by Roman “Catholics” against the Protestants?

  106. Voltair says:
    @dimples

    “Some of you shall not taste death before my return”
    The second comming is when he appears to YOU personally….this has happened to many alive today. It is not as rare as you may think.
    The Christ taught on 2 levels one for the masses and one level for the inner circle.
    The Exoteric level …the churches are in terminal decline. While the Churches were strong they suppressed the Esoteric teachings and they went underground.
    These esoteric teachings are still alive and surfaced from time to time in movements such as the Rosecrussions.
    Today the esoteric teachings are to be found in movements such as Anthropasophy ( Rudolf Steiner ).
    Forget about the Church it is now in the hands of the Antichrist.
    When Jesus was asked by a disciple why he spoke to the masses in parables he replied ” their ears are waxed dumb they see not…but to you it is given to know the things of God”
    The Christ is alive today…join the inner circle.

    • Replies: @Alden
  107. @brabantian

    What a mountain of monstrous lies, you tell, brabantian. The New Testament does not order massacres or genocide, and makes the case against circumcision, ends it! Etc. etc. You are a monster. Crazy!

  108. anon[174] • Disclaimer says:
    @Kevin Barrett

    RE: “race-worshipping”

    Rabbi Jesus addressed “race-worshipping” thusly:

    We worship what we do know, for salvation is from the Jews.” John 4:22

    Every. Single. Time.

    • Troll: Seraphim
    • Replies: @R2b
  109. As someone has said here, your proposed solution amounts to locking the stable door after the horse has bolted. A revival of Christianity … there have been many such. A book from the 1970s, The Evangelical Renaissance by Donald G. Bloesch, immensely detailed, describes the huge jump in faithful Christians then. And the picture is totally different from what we see as Evangelicals today, no Scofield among the large, huge list of names, no “rapture” in the detailed index, which has no mention of Israel, nothing under Z. Searching the Subject Index I did find “millenarianism” and off-hand descriptions of pre- and post-millenarianism, totally different from the mad megachurches and televangelisms of today.

    No, the answer is not another Christian revival. The answer must start with a One State Solution in Palestine giving equal rights to all. Once that has happened the Pharisaic monster will itself disappear. It’s now known as the Holocaust Religion which just means it’s going away after the monstrous evil Judaism has shown itself to be in Palestine. Which yes, is more of the same, killing babies at Passover, killing Gentiles for no reason etc etc. One State Solution.

  110. Franz says:
    @Bardon Kaldian

    Hermeticism was not that important in transformation of European societies.

    See:

    The Forbidden Universe

    (2011) by Lynn Picknett and Clive Prince.

    The arguments are rational, it’s extensively researched with plenty of notes, and it makes it clear Hermeticism was a main driver of scientific progress from da Vinci on.

  111. @ThreeCranes

    Everything that MacDonald describes white people as actually doing, MacDonald clearly hates.

    Ask yourself, what about white people, as they exist, does MacDonald like or respect? There’s certainly zero love there.

    You might counter that at least he makes the Jews responsible for everything, but that is worse! It means that MacDonald hates everything about white people as they exist and doesn’t even respect them enough to allow them agency…

    [MORE]

    The whole MacDonald persona is so (self-)tortured and bizarre. He’s a man thoroughly alienated from himself meaning that somehow both parts have been externalised onto others. His feeling is white people, a sense he obviously holds in zero regard, while his awareness is the Jews, a sense he despises and sees as conspiring against the feeling that he has no regard for anyway. What a mess….

  112. Derer says:
    @Anon

    We have no choice…on the other hand, Islam is an intolerant man made medieval doctrine of camel shepherds where cohabitation with other believes is not possible. It spread over because of neglect by other affluent civilizations. What future is there when two major sects killing each other from immanent hate lead by imams. Friday beheading, Monday stoning mostly pregnant rape victims.

  113. Alden says:
    @Art

    Except for the Church of England which was essentially a property confiscation by Henry 8, the Protestant reformation of western and Central Europe was a rejection of the Christian New Testament and a return to the Jewish Old Testament.

    • Replies: @Art
  114. Alden says:
    @Franz

    Those texts were in the Vatican, cathedral and monastic libraries. The texts allegedly discovered in the Arab world were not in Muslim lib . They were in the Christian monastery libraries. Syria, Egypt what’s now Iraq were one third Christian of various denominations back in the day. The Arab conquest absorbed the existing Christian libraries.

    Before the Caliph of Baghdad burned all the books but the Koran, in the great library of Alexandria cerca 900 AD many of the books were brought to the Vatican library in Rome, orthodox libraries in Byzantium, and St Catherine’s monastery in Egypt and the Christian monasteries in Syria.

    Conventional enlightenment Masonic Protestant Jewish history is just so false.

    The Muslim conquest ran over the great Mediterranean civilizations. They didn’t create anything . The ancient wisdom was there on the shores of the Mediterranean in Christian, not Muslim libraries. 400 years after the Muslim conquest Muslim civilization overwhelmed Mediterranean civilization on the south shores of the Mediterranean and the Muslim world hasn’t advanced since.

    You’re just parroting Jewish anti Christian propaganda. The primitive catholic Irish tribes did more to preserve the ancient wisdom back in 600 AD than any Muslims ever did.

    How can you be so naive and gullible to believe the Jewish lies? I managed to figure it out first year of high school in the world cultures and history class.

    The chapters on the Muslim conquest and Muslim civilization were full of praise for the Muslims and total contempt for the Europeans.

    But those chapters came after the chapters about Egypt Sumeria Mesopotamia Greece, Rome. I was only 14 but soon realized that the primitive Arabs took over those ancient civilizations and didn’t preserve anything . The Christian monasteries in the areas preserved and copied the ancient wisdom, And sent the books to Europe where they were copied and re copied.

    Later on I discovered that the great mosques, the splendid city of Ishfan, all the buildings in Muslim territory were built by captured Christian slaves from engineers and architects to the unskilled labor

    Masonic, Jewish, enlightenment history, a crock of lies.

    My personal opinion is that the ordinary unknown European working men who invented modern tools and machinery contributed a lot more to civilization than those Ancient Greek philosophers.

    Best thing about the ancient world was Roman plumbing and water and sewer departments, not Plato Buddha and Aristotle Et al yakking away.

    • Replies: @Franz
    , @Masonic wages
  115. Alden says:
    @Voltair

    When you say The Church which of the approximately 20,000 Christian denominations do you mean?

  116. Anonymous[339] • Disclaimer says:
    @Dr. Robert Morgan

    Science doesn’t have all the answers yet. But it also isn’t content just to say, in explaining why something happened, “Because it’s the will of God.”

    The above is a very serious mistake. Science cannot function without God any more than Capitalism can function without God. And this is inescapable fact, not metaphor. Here’s the proof for the science part of my statement:

    Science has largely been “what is the will of God, as manifested in the physical universe?”. Neo-thomism was the doctrine: since God created the universe, the universe contains God’s fingerprints, as it were, so we can learn about God from knowing about the universe.

    Of course, your point is that science, as a Western endeavor, doesn’t stop with “Because it is the will of God”, it looks to observed facts. Note that a believer in Islam could also do that, but considers it a waste of time, since Allah is not constrained, as God is, by previous actions. Therefore, gravity might work today, but might not tomorrow, and in any case will stop working when Allah wishes it.

    For science to exist, the society has to have a particular kind of Supreme Being. Jupiter would never have imposed Newtonian physics, for example, nor would Enlil. Both had different interests and different constraints.

    The very small part that organized religion plays in today’s West is destroying science, just as it has replaced Capitalism with “Finance Capitalism”, which was once called usury.

    Consider the current COVID-19 situation. It is fairly plain that factual studies and laboratory reports have been ignored or suppressed. I, personally, saw in real time the appearance and disappearance of a paper concerning splicing of HIV and SARS introns into an early strain of SARS-CoV-2. The paper was posted by foreign scientists working in the US, and they apparently didn’t understand the politics of their organization, I say this because administrative personnel took down the posted paper within 8 hours, although it was well within standard practice for the institution in question.
    During an academic career of several years it became apparent that most of the faculty was deadwood, and that original research, no matter how well backed up, was simply not wanted. The faculty was deadwood, or was young people diverted from achievable solutions into fascinating but probably unanswerable questions of theory (e.g. is there a way to solve NP problems in linear time?) Moreover, the administrations acted very much like sub-verbal thugs in their interactions with faculty.

    How could this be? Well, consider academic work as simply a way to make money. The obvious thing is to keep the boss happy, keep the customers happy, work as little as possible, and concentrate on family or fun or both, as you please. This translates (after the Left’s “student riots” of the 1960s) into “keep the government happy”, “keep the students happy”, “get deadwod faculty who teach the students material that is easy enough for the students to do without much work, and hard enough to make them think they are accomplishing something by learning it”. You want teachers with an IQ in the 110 range, so they can communicate with a 110-90 IQ range found in today’s universities. Why would anybody want anything different?

    Well, the answer is religion. If you believe that God wants to be worshiped by humans learning about His nature as manifested in the universe, then failing to do that, or permitting others to block such worship, will directly incur the wrath of God. The above situation must be ended so to avoid God’s wrath. If there is no belief in God, no religious establishment, then the above situation goes uncorrected. Research stops, politics reigns, and science/engineering is replaced by a nonfunctional but animatronic (to use a metaphor). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Animatronics

    The USSR found this out the hard way. No religion, no research, even no work. It would appear that the West is going to repeat that experience. Jeremiah had the general idea of that particular experience, and note that the USSR and the West both abandoned belief in God and started believing in something else.

    And here, for those interested, is a very brief discussion of why Capitalism is unrelated to the current system of “Finance Capitalism”, which is very closely related to the historical practice of usury.

    • Replies: @Ole
    , @Adûnâi
    , @Mefobills
  117. R2b says:
    @anon

    It’s ”Out of Judah”.
    Certainly not from what we today call Jews.
    It was a prophesy, that Christ, the anointed one, Messiah, would come through the line of Judah.
    After the Temple destruction, 70 AD, no lineage if Judah exists.

  118. @Crush Limbraw

    Jesus was crucified as “King of the Jews” and he will return to take that throne, the throne of David, which will make him the King of Israel, as David was the king of Israel. He will only return when the current nation of Israel is on the verge of total annihilation, with two thirds of them having been wiped out. Read Zechariah chapters 12-14. The surviving Jews will accept him then when they “look upon him whom they pierced and mourn” for the great mistake they made and persisted in. He will be the Jewish messiah.
    Jesus said that when he returned “would he find the faith”, so the Christian religion will be in poor shape at that time, and the evidence of its decline is obvious now. Jesus also said that when he returns “it will be as in the days of Sodom and Gomorrah”.
    The three great monotheistic religions with claims on Jerusalem have all got things wrong.
    Both Jews and Moslems correctly assert the monotheism of God, but they both deny that Jesus Christ was God’s Son.
    Most Christians assert that Jesus Christ was Son of God, but most wrongly assert that he was also God the Son, only a one third part of an alleged Trinity with the Father and the Holy Spirit.
    Monotheism is correct, and only the Father is God, with Jesus being His created human Son via Mary. Jesus’s coming was long prophesied in the scriptures, and the Holy Spirit is the evidence of the Father’s great power, with which He created the earth.
    The Bible offers eternal life via resurrection of the dead at the second coming of Jesus. Until then the deceased faithful of all ages are sleeping in the grave. Immortality is conditional on faithful belief in God’s promises. There is no immortal soul, hell is the grave, and even Jesus Christ went to the hell of the grave, and the Apostles Creed correctly states that after his death, “he descended into hell”. Mary is currently sleeping in the grave and is not interceding between Christians and God, and the Bible makes no claim that she is. Jesus Christ is fulfilling that role now.
    Jesus expects his followers to “put up the sword” and “turn the other cheek” and if necessary to allow those who hate them to destroy their bodies. By this definition, which is the definition Jesus himself supplied, there have never been many real Christians, but many masquerading as Christians, and who give Christianity a bad name.

    • Agree: coolhand850
  119. Seraphim says:
    @Dr. Robert Morgan

    What is ‘natural’ and ‘supernatural’? What is ‘Nature’ after all?

    • Replies: @anon
  120. @Rich

    That is a reasonable objection. The Jewish and American practice of circumcising newborns is undoubtedly devastating for their future emotional health, since we now know that the single most important factor in emotional health is a secure mother-infant bond (see Bowlby, etc.) which infant circumcision destroys. Babies need to be in skin contact with their mothers and caregivers essentially 24/7 and breastfed on demand for at least two years in order to develop an optimally secure bonding experience bestowing lifelong inner peace and security. Extreme trauma like circumcision breaks the bond. The earlier it happens, the more damaging. (We are shaped most powerfully by our earliest experiences, and the older we are, the less we are affected.)

    Islamic circumcision, by contrast, is a coming-to-adulthood ritual that happens in late boyhood, often around age eight or nine. So it is vastly less damaging, since the child already developed secure attachment (the Qur’an mandates breastfeeding on demand for two full years). But it is still very traumatic and unpleasant, despite efforts to turn it into a celebration of leaving the maternal world of children and entering the world of men.

    For what it’s worth, nowhere is circumcision mandated in the Qur’an; on the contrary, we are told that even notching the ears of cattle is an offense to God’s perfect creation. So the custom is based on ahadith, and a minority of Islamic scholars dispute its authenticity and argue that the custom crept into Islam after the time of the Prophet (pbuh) and companions due to the influence of Jewish converts.

    Bottom line: You can revert to Islam simply by professing “no God but God, and Muhammad is His prophet.” You do NOT need to be circumcised!

    • Replies: @Rich
  121. Franz says:
    @Alden

    My personal opinion is that the ordinary unknown European working men who invented modern tools and machinery contributed a lot more to civilization than those Ancient Greek philosophers.

    You got my vote on that, no sweat. We foundry men and bricklayers did scads more for the world than any lazy scholar.

    Still, I would hesitate to let the 14 year old in me jettison history I don’t care much for as “Jewish lies”.

    It might seem like a great way to declutter, but it misses a lot.

  122. @Mefobills

    I agree that the notion of abrogation has been used to create some bad interpretive traditions, most obviously the wahhabi-takfiri ones. But this problem would barely even exist if the British and later the Zionist Americans hadn’t weaponized wahhabi Islam (representing .01% of Muslims) against mainstream Islam (representing most of the rest). It was the Anglo-Zionist Empire’s arming and funding of wahhabis that created the problem.

    Any fair-minded holistic interpretation of Islamic scripture yields a religion that does not need much if any “reform.” The best single volume in English on the mainstream Islamic scriptural interpretive tradition, relying heavily on the most notable traditional sources, is Nasr etc.’s The Study Qur’an. https://www.amazon.com/Study-Quran-New-Translation-Commentary/dp/0061125873 Read it and then explain to me what needs reforming.

    • Replies: @Mefobills
  123. @dimples

    I agree that Western conversion to Islam will help revitalize Islam. But it won’t destroy the West. Islam views itself as the protector, not the destroyer, of Christianity and Christians. Once the West reaches a threshhold of, say, 30% Muslim population, half converts and half immigrants, you’ll start to see a revitalization of Christianity as Muslim values start to prevail over atheistic/satanic/hedonistic ones, leading many Europeans to return to their Christian roots. Once Muslims achieve a significant share of power in Europe, they will not tolerate satanic-atheist types burning churches and mocking Jesus and Christianity.

    Muslims are generally far more horrified than non-Muslim Europeans at the cultural genocide against Christianity in Europe—the desecration of churches, obscene insults to Jesus, etc. Given power, Muslims will put an end to that, rebuild the churches, and encourage Christians to fill them.

    • Replies: @anon
  124. anon[174] • Disclaimer says:
    @Art

    Art believes the key ingredient to making Magic Dirt work as an contratribal melting pot is Magic Jesus! Of course, the Jews gotta get their shekels for providing the magical Rabbi Jesus, even unto this day. “For if the Gentiles have shared in the Jews’ spiritual blessings, they owe it to the Jews to share with them their material blessings.” Romans 15:27

  125. Ole says:
    @Anonymous

    Thank you for this post.

    The issue, it would seem, is that the world is operating absent a tenable moral framework. The last bastion of Capitalist morality in the United States existed when pensions were still around.

    As religiosity has been on the decline for decades now–perhaps true religious belief even longer–the pension stood in the way of profit, which exists in the realm of the physical.

    And so what we have today is interesting. The United States only adopted “In God We Trust” in 1957 to differentiate itself from the secular Soviet Union. Contemporary religion exists in the realm of the physical. If before prayer served as a means of bringing one to proximity with God, today prayer is directed at prosperity, abundance, and well-being. Heaven is also seen as a place where there is no pain and only endless pleasure. Both of these elements are physical elements. They place the corporeal at the forefront of life. There is no spiritual development; no idea of a soul; only the temporal.

    This is the current trajectory we are on. The hedonistic pursuit is merely that overt concentration on the physical.

    When children are taught how to have anal sex, but they’re not taught how to love, the future is certain.

  126. Mefobills says:
    @Kevin Barrett

    Read it and then explain to me what needs reforming.

    I agree MI6 and globo-homo weaponized Islam. One could even make the argument that Al-Wahhab might not have come up with Wahhabism absent British influence.

    Al-Wahhabs central point is that every idea added to Islam after third century to about 950 AD is false and should be eliminated.

    Wahhabists and Salafists totally use abrogation techniques as core elements to validate their theories.

    I’m not hostile to Suffi’s or other more pacific branches that have overcome Islam’s contradictions. The thing is, these contradictions are at the core of Islam, so the bad guys can rightly call out others as apostates. Demonizing others is the first step to war and murder.

    I hope your right, that new translation can overcome the contradictions.

    • Replies: @Kevin Barrett
  127. Anonymous[339]: “Science has largely been “what is the will of God, as manifested in the physical universe?” … For science to exist, the society has to have a particular kind of Supreme Being.”

    I’d perhaps modify your last sentence here to “For science to begin …”, although I’m not sure I agree with the premise. In my view, classical civilization might well have developed science centuries earlier had it not had its fatal encounter with Christianity. In any case, most scientists today are atheists, at least in practice if not as a matter of ideology. In their researches, they aren’t looking to uncover “the will of God” any more. One could say the same of virtually everyone in the modern world, even those still pretending that they are believers. For example, if a Christian’s car fails to start, does he throw up his hands and pray to God to fix it, or does he take it to a mechanic, who will systematically (i.e., scientifically) attempt to diagnose the problem?

    You seem to be arguing for a deistic conception of God. But as I said, if God doesn’t intervene in his creation, or can’t, then he becomes superfluous; an unnecessary hypothesis. If the universe is the mechanistic, rational place it seems to be, he’s no longer needed. If he can’t or won’t answer prayers and perform miracles, what’s the point of worship? A universe in which he can’t or won’t intervene is functionally the same as a universe in which he doesn’t exist at all.

  128. Seraphim: “What is ‘natural’ and ‘supernatural’? What is ‘Nature’ after all?”

    The Christian conception of God has him standing apart from his creation. That makes him “supernatural”. In this way of regarding things, you could say that “Nature” is everything else; everything that is not God.

    • Replies: @Seraphim
  129. anon[174] • Disclaimer says:
    @Kevin Barrett

    Will Muslim invaders “encourage Christians” much like they have long encouraged the Coptic Orthodox Church?

    Fiery but peaceful encouragment!

  130. Adûnâi says: • Website
    @Anon

    An impeccable contra MacDonald by Chechar aka César Tort, a priest of the Four Words from Nueva España.
    https://chechar.wordpress.com/2020/08/21/kevin-macdonalds-apologetics/

  131. @Monotheistic Christian

    Your reply is irrelevant to the context of my comment – yours is just one of many theories which I have seen before. If you wish to discuss and/or debate it, I suggest you do so with the authors directly, whose articles I have archived in DaLimbraw Library. That is the purpose of my links within my comment – in other words – do your own research!
    I also suggest you RE-READ my comment and follow ALL the links as they thread through the subject – should take you days, if not weeks. ‘Churchianity’ alone is a subject unto itself!
    To repeat – “Finally, my website and DaLimbraw Library are not designed for casual readers – but they’re certainly welcome – and might even become researchers themselves.”
    What’s so hard to understand about that statement?

  132. Adûnâi says: • Website
    @Anonymous

    > “…since Allah is not constrained, as God is, by previous actions. Therefore, gravity might work today, but might not tomorrow, and in any case will stop working when Allah wishes it.”

    This is just boring old Mutazilism. The Mutazilites considered Allah to be bound by his own morality. Morality to them exists independently of Allah. Doesn’t it remind you of anything?

    Liberals. Liberals are Mutazilites. They reject Jesus’ divinity, yet wholly accept his teaching, his axiology. The Red Giant article by The Conservative Swede explains it wonderfully.
    https://chechar.wordpress.com/2012/02/21/red-giant/

    > “The USSR found this out the hard way. No religion, no research, even no work.”

    Oh no, this is pure delusion now. Isn’t it a matter of good tone to observe reality and draw conclusions? Isn’t it polite to be a materialist, biological and economical?

    I will say that Man has consciousness so developed, and so under-developed, that he allows malicious memes to lead his civilisation to self-mutilation and collctive suicide under Christianity. Rome 313, France 1789, America 1861, Russia 1991. Yet the DPR of Juche Korea lives!

    @Dr. Robert Morgan #98
    > “In asserting that the universe is a rational place that can be completely understood in terms of cause and effect, it would even be fair to say that science is man’s ongoing project to abolish God.”

    Nicely said! Yet, playing Jesus’ advocate, I must wonder – what do you think of the quantum mechanics which explicitly have no causal links, no reason, only randomness?

  133. MrVoid says:

    Speaking as a Buddhist (but not one someone who really feels particularly qualified) I’ll weigh in the importance of “God”. Obviously, as a Buddhist, I do not believe in God, but I do believe in some supernatural things, or more properly put, things that cannot be validated by science (karma being chief among them). To me, the relevant question, is: Does human civilization depend on belief in scientifically unsupportable ideas for its survival and stability? Ironically, that is a scientific question and, although it’s a scientific question you cannot test it because you cannot run controlled experiments on civilizations. People asking that question are in the same uncomfortable boat as economists. All the same, I personally think that civillisation may require some rough universal belief in karma. People that don’t believe “you reap what you sew” are undermining civillisation right now.

  134. @Mefobills

    “Al-Wahhabs central point is that every idea added to Islam after third century to about 950 AD is false and should be eliminated.” But he’s wrong. Sufism dates back to the time of the Prophet (pbuh) and became formalized in the 800s, when seminal Sufi figures like al-Junayd were active.

    The Wahhabis are obscurantists (a polite term for willfully ignorant idiots) who imagine that there is such a thing as an “original text” with no relationship to context or interpretation. They are very far outside the mainstream Islamic interpretive tradition, which is well represented in The Study Qur’an. (Nothing new needed—this is 1400 year old mainstream Islam.)

    • Replies: @Iris
  135. Iris says:
    @Kevin Barrett

    The Wahhabis are obscurantists (a polite term for willfully ignorant idiots)

    I think you are being extremely civil.

    I have met many educated Suni Muslims, with homogeneous ethnic, social and cultural background, living in equally homogeneous Muslim nations, who call Wahhabis “the Cancer of Islam”.

  136. American Citizen 2.0 says:
    @anon

    And more than a few molested children in Sunday school or got arrested for their 3rd DUI after their second divorce and so on and so forth.

    It’s a nostalgia for a time and place that never actually existed. Christian morality was basically a tyranny to most people, which is why everyone is gay or crazy or allergic to peanuts or terrified of black people now. Whatever the moralizers and improvers of humanity were trying to do with the perpetual evangelical revival that we were forced to conform to for decades… it didn’t work.

  137. Mefobills says:
    @Anonymous

    Max Weber broke Capitalism into two parts:

    Jewish Speculative Pariah Capitalism, while Puritan was bourgeois organization of labor.

    Weber thus excluded the properties of Usury with the Puritan branch he was defending.

    Weber convinced himself that Western Capitalism (not the Jewish speculative finance capital) was a rational industrial organization with regular market functions, and was not political or irrational.

    If Weber had lived 14 more years (he died in 1920) he would have seen the crash, then Great Depression, and would had to admit that those disasters were not isolated finance “capital” dealings, but involved all of capitalist enterprises of entire nations, especially the ruling finance and political elites.

    If Weber had lived through WW2, and observed it, he might conclude that puritan capitalism types still had influence and were in the drivers seat… in other words, it wasn’t always the Jew, but was greed from the Puritan class.

    How about post war, where IMF became enforcement arm for the banking class? Was the IMF Jewish speculative capital, or was it organization of labor?

    Private money issuance with hypothecation, even in non-jew hands, is too much power, and Puritanism in no way has the ability to check this money power. Judeo-Christians puritan (protestants) are apostates to what Jesus intended.

    Jesus started his mission on the Jubilee year. Jesus whipped the money changers. Jesus did not ignore usury or make excuses like those from Weber.

    Render unto Ceaser what it his. The money power belongs to the sovereign.

  138. Rich says:
    @Kevin Barrett

    Mutilation of one’s genitals is unacceptable at any age. I am unfamiliar with any Muslim culture that doesn’t practice this barbaric act.

  139. Art says:
    @mark green

    Mark — Here is my take on Christianity.

    Christianity is a faith. There is no traceable evidence or truth that Jesus is the son of God, or of the virgin birth, or of the Resurrection and ascendancy to heaven. Those are matters of faith. Heaven and hell and life after death are also matters of faith. But that is not all there is to Christianity. There is also a Christian philosophy for living with each other. That philosophy for living can be judged and graded by history.

    All great religions have two components to them, the adherent’s defining relationship to some deity (religion) and a defined method of how to interact with each other and the universe (philosophy).

    Here is simple Christianity defined, first religion then philosophy. Jesus Christ: “You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind. This is the great and first commandment. And a second is like it: You shall love your neighbor as yourself.”

    Those philosophical words on love, and other Christian words that respect life, prescribe hope, value truth, forgive the past, and extend grace to all have led to the idealistic success of the West. Philosophical Christianity is idealistic.

    The stark truth is that no other religion/philosophy has accomplished the human progress that Christianity has. What it has achieved is measurable.

    Jesus said to use our mind to love each other. Christian idealism is an intellectual attainment. It is the opposite of tribalism which is biological and unintellectual.

    An ideal is never attainable – it is something to be reached for. Christianity is an intellectual engine that pulls humanity slowly forward.

    Humanity has no choice but to be philosophically Christian.

    It is observable that as we abandon Christianity, we are going backwards.

    • Thanks: mark green
    • Replies: @anon
  140. Seraphim says:
    @Dr. Robert Morgan

    So, how could then Cicero speak of the ‘Nature of the Gods’?

  141. anon[174] • Disclaimer says:
    @Art

    Ethiopia has been hitched to the “intellectual engine that pulls humanity slowly forward” since the Holy Spirit teleported an apostle to convert Black lives, with Christianity established as the official religion in 330 AD, yet it remains an African shithole.

    The stark truth is that everything went downhill after men stopped wearing hats. 🕵️

    • Replies: @Art
  142. Art says:
    @anon

    Ethiopia has been hitched to the “intellectual engine that pulls humanity slowly forward” since the Holy Spirit teleported an apostle to convert Black lives, with Christianity established as the official religion in 330 AD, yet it remains an African shithole.

    Gee — you got me – should we scrap all of Christianity?

    p.s. Hmm — Is Ethiopia the biggest shithole in Africa?

    • Replies: @anon
  143. Seraphim says:
    @dimples

    People are not aware and adamantly refuse to understand that the ‘Second Coming’ is the “Day of the Last Judgement”, when the “Son of God who sitteth on the right hand of the Father; from thence he shall come again, with glory, to judge the quick and the dead, whose kingdom shall have no end (because it is not ‘of this world’). ” Blessed are they that do his commandments, that they may have right to the tree of life, and may enter in through the gates into the city. For without are dogs, and sorcerers, and whoremongers, and murderers, and idolaters, and whosoever loveth and maketh a lie”.
    Until then “He that is unjust, let him be unjust still: and he which is filthy, let him be filthy still: and he that is righteous, let him be righteous still: and he that is holy, let him be holy still. 12 And, behold, I come quickly; and my reward is with me, to give every man according as his work shall be. 13 I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the end, the first and the last”.
    ” Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind, 10 Nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners, shall inherit the kingdom of God”.

    • Thanks: SeekerofthePresence
  144. Art says:
    @Alden

    Except for the Church of England which was essentially a property confiscation by Henry 8, the Protestant reformation of western and Central Europe was a rejection of the Christian New Testament and a return to the Jewish Old Testament.

    Exactly!

    Every human organization needs some kind of an authority to turn too.

    The Catholic Church had the Pope as the supreme court. Martin Luther needed an authority to back him up. He chose the Jew Old Testament. He put Jew thought in charge of Christianity. Jew thought and Christian thought are diametrically opposed. The Jew God is mean, vindictive, and tribal – the Christian God is hopeful, forgiving, and universal.

    There is no question, but that Martin Luther took Christianity in the wrong direction. One of the results of this misdirection is Christian Zionism.

    • Replies: @anon
  145. @anonymous

    I truly detest your tribe. Why do you monkeys see the trinity as polytheism?

    • Replies: @anon
  146. @Anonymous

    This is one of the few sane comments in the entire thread. Half the comments are trolling, askimg what a white person is, talkimg about the purpose of religion, etc.

  147. anon[174] • Disclaimer says:
    @Art

    Your attempt to de-Jew Christianity are as futile as Joe Biden’s desperate denials to distance himself from the fiery but peaceful protests. Martin Luther certainly didn’t write this: “To the Jews ‘belong the sonship, the glory, the covenants, the giving of the law, the worship…’” (Catechism of the Catholic Church) And this Jewish author, not Martin Luther, was the first Christian Zionist: “The deliverer will come from Zion.” (Romans 11:26)

    • Troll: Seraphim
    • Replies: @Art
  148. anon[174] • Disclaimer says:
    @Art

    No, Ethiopia isn’t the worst shithole; Rwanda is 94% Christian. But why haven’t you moved there to fellowship with your brothers in Christ? By your notions, Rwanda should be the paragon of “idealistic success” and “human progress.”

    • Replies: @Art
  149. anon[174] • Disclaimer says:
    @Seraphim

    Seraphim, do you still believe whites are the result of a “genetical defect,” as you stated two years ago?

    Seraphim says:
    October 23, 2018 at 7:10 pm GMT
    The irony is that the ‘white’ people ar [sic] actually blacks discolored. It is a genetical defect which affects their brain too, whence their limited capacity of comprehension of the world surrounding them.

  150. anon[174] • Disclaimer says:
    @Suicidal_canadian

    If trinity means three, and poly means more than one—by definition making three a polynomial—then who is truly monkeyin’ around with the maths? Moreover, if you truly detest the Tribe, how can you swallow this blatant example of Hebrew Supremacy: “The Jew First” (Romans 1:16)? Why can’t whites sit it the front of the bus? And what sort of white man would celebrate any form of the Jewish Passover sacrifice of human firstborn males? “Christ, our Passover lamb, has been sacrificed.” (1 Cor. 5:7) That’s something to ponder on this particular day of the week, Woden’s Day. But you despise your white ancestors who knew the significance of today’s veneration, or tomorrow’s Thor’s Day, because you worship a Globalist, Internationalist Rabbi. It’s no wonder you feel suicidal.

    • Troll: Seraphim
  151. @Craig Nelsen

    Don’t have any questions just yet but I just wanted to say thanks and go get the bastards my man

  152. TGD says:
    @Gerhard57NL

    Religion.was, at the same time, shaped to benefit a chosen few, like the “middle men” with claimed connections to the god. They appointed themselves to punish resistance and reward and “bless” obedience and favorable behavior.

    Sounds like Gerhard57NL was a product of the old fashioned neighborhood parochial school where innocent little children were indoctrinated in the tenets of the faith by nuns wielding long rulers- spoofed in the movie, “The Blues Brothers.”

  153. Art says:
    @anon

    No, Ethiopia isn’t the worst shithole; Rwanda is 94% Christian. But why haven’t you moved there to fellowship with your brothers in Christ? By your notions, Rwanda should be the paragon of “idealistic success” and “human progress.”

    Hmm — They must have read Martin Luther’s Old Testament about the Amalekites.

    “Now go, attack the Amalekites and totally destroy all that belongs to them. Do not spare them; put to death men and women, children and infants, cattle and sheep, camels and donkeys.’”

    • Replies: @anon
  154. Art says:
    @anon

    The New Testament is full of contradictions. Intellectually honest people acknowledge that the theme of the NT is positive and uplifting and that it has fostered the success of Western culture.

    • Replies: @anon
  155. Art says:
    @geokat62

    Without ethno-nationalism, the world will fall to JSO’s GloboHomo dystopian nightmare.

    Maybe the Jew MSM has gone to far with blaming Trump for the Antifa violence. Maybe a little nationalistic fever is emerging. The Drudge Fake News headlines are catching hell. C-Span call-in shows are experiencing pushback against the Democrats.

    Am beginning to think that 2020 – is the biggest election since Lincoln.

  156. anon[174] • Disclaimer says:
    @Art

    The Old Testament isn’t Martin Luther’s; what blatant lie. In reality, the New Testament authors directly quoted the Old Testament 695 times and referenced it 4105 times.

    How many times do the writers of the New Testament quote the Old Testament? An index in the Jewish New Testament catalogs 695 separate quotations from the books of the Old Testament in the New (Jewish New Testament Publications, Jerusalem, 1989). There are many other passages where the Old Testament is referred to , as in cases where an Old Testament figure is mentioned, but no specific scripture is quoted. Depending on which scholar’s work you examine, the number of quotations and references in the New Testament to the Old may be as high as 4,105.

    The Expositor’s Bible Commentary
    Zondervan, Grand Rapids, 1979, Vol. I, p. 617

    One cannot read the New Testament without recieving a heavy dose of Old Testament.

    • Replies: @Art
  157. Art says:
    @anon

    Did the New Testament say anything about the Jew God Amalekite atrocities?

    I don’t think so — so those missguied Africans got that from Martin Luther’s Old Testament.

    The New Christian God is universal – not tribal. Mr. Luther sure did a bad thing.

    • Replies: @anon
  158. anon[174] • Disclaimer says:
    @Art

    Gideon is lauded in the New Testament (Hebrews 11:32-33) as one of many Old Testament characters “Who through faith subdued kingdoms.” And what kingdoms did Gideon oppose (“atrocities” in your words) according to Judges 7:11-25? “Now the Midianites, Amalekites, and all the other people of the east had settled in the valley like a swarm of locusts, and their camels were as countless as the sand on the seashore. And as Gideon arrived…”

    You’ve been caught either lying or you’re completely unaware of what is actually written in the New Testament.

  159. anon[771] • Disclaimer says:

    Once again, I find myself deeply unimpressed with MacDonald’s assertions. I am really not surprised someone like him taught in California, I’ll say that much. I don’t think he really realizes what Southern Europeans think of his white idealism.

  160. anon[174] • Disclaimer says:
    @Art

    If you’re so very intellectually honest a judge of foreign desert peoples’ texts, then you must really love the Quaran, since it is even less violent than the New Testament.

    “Killing and destruction are referenced slightly more often in the New Testament (2.8%) than in the Quran (2.1%)…

    ‘Violence more common’ in Bible than Quran, text analysis reveals
    http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/books/violence-more-common-bible-quran-text-analysis-reveals-a6863381.html

  161. anarchyst says:
    @Mefobills

    Using the “Old Testament” for “laws” is wrong. Yes, the Ten Commandments proscribe certain behavior, but the rest of mosaic law relies on a vindictive, vengeful “god” to exact “punishment” on “his people”. That my work fine for jews, as they have their evil “talmud” to rely on, but “for the rest of us”, it won’t wash.

    In fact, every jewish “holiday” is based on the celebration of genocide of gentiles.
    Our present troubles are a result of a jewish cabal taking over political decisions in our nominally “multicultural” country.

    Tying Judaism to Christianity was a clever trick used by the jews to “cement” their claim to the “land of Israel” and of the covenant, to which I reply, “God is not a real estate agent”.
    Jews rejected the covenant when they murdered Jesus Christ. Their covenant with God was then “null and void”.

    It is the flawed Schofield translation of the Bible that elevated jews to the status of Christianity’s “elder brothers”, which was then reinforced by the Catholic (flawed) “Vatican II Ecumenical Council” in the 1960s.

    I cringe when I hear well-meaning people talk about out judeo-Christian heritage.
    Nothing could be further from the truth.

    The only common thread between Christianity and judaism may be the Ten Commandments, nothing more.

    The god of judaism is a vengeful god, totally unlike the merciful and welcoming God of Christianity.

    Christianity welcomes ALL, regardless of nationality or social status, not true of judaism.

    Judaism is an insular belief system that shuns outsiders, prohibits proselytization, and promotes a form of supremacy, relegating all gentiles (non-jews) to the status of livestock-subhumans with souls, only to be used for the advancement and benefit of jews. In fact, slavery (of goyim) is still condoned and encouraged in the jewish Talmud.

    Jews DID murder Jesus Christ. Sad to say, even the present-day (post-Vatican II ecumenical council) Catholic church has bought into absolving the jews for Jesus Christ’s murder. As always is the case, the jews got others, the Romans to do their dirty work for them, the crucifixion of Jesus Christ. How can Christians have the same values as the Jews; the very people who denounced and betrayed the founder of Christianity, Jesus Christ, and call for his execution (by others, of course, that is the Jewish way).

    It makes absolutely no sense at all.

    Jews have no respect for Christianity, for Jesus Christ or Mary, his mother, who are both honored as Prophets in Islam, but instead, Jews spit on hearing their names and do the same while passing a Christian of any kind or a Christian Church in Israel. They have no respect for Christians or any other religion.

    It is time the Jewish lobbies and the American Government leaders as well as the evangelical Christian leaders who mislead the poor American young into joining the military and believing that they are doing something for God and Christianity by fighting Israel’s wars were named, shamed and arrested and tried for treason.

    • Agree: Mefobills
    • Replies: @anon
  162. Christianity is one very confusing religion … and the devil and his children, and bought off blackmailed goys made it that way. We have one God but most believers don’t even know His name which was completely removed from scripture. The fact that the devil’s human children are alive and well on earth is another fact kept hidden from most Christians. Somewhere in time they made Jesus into a Jew along with the disciples (not true). Many other lies have been heaped on us and we don’t know it. While Christians have been busy loving and loving each other the devil’s children have taken over much of the world thru various ways. This isn’t what the Father wanted and maybe He has no desire to save this world because someday it’s gonna come to an end.

    The Bible itself because of man made and/or Satanic changes is a very confusing book too. So there are definitely things we are taught in the Bible which are false and/or translated improperly. But they start on us at a very young age to accept that it’s all 100% true or we might go to hell.

    “I am not come but for the lost sheep of the House of Israel.” Those “sheep” are not Jewish nor follow the Talmud. Christians today aren’t sure just who the hell they are … and corrupted churches makes sure this continues. Show me a very confident Christian and I’ll show you a professional Christian and/or a con artist.

    • Replies: @Seraphim
  163. Seraphim says:
    @John Q Duped

    Confusion is in your head and in the heads of the ones who duped you.

  164. @Anon

    Q Anon is full of conspiracy theories.

  165. anon[100] • Disclaimer says:
    @anarchyst

    Christianity welcomes ALL, regardless of nationality

    True.

    How is that a good thing?

    • Replies: @anarchyst
  166. Kali says:
    @Occasional lurker

    . We don’t need a return to medieval ethics exemplified by Nibelungentreue and serfdom, which, by the way, is a lot like Islamic fundamentalist values.

    We need a return to modernity from postmodernity, with a rationlist, common sense humanism that realistically acknowledges human nature and the limits of dogoodery

    What if you’re both wrong? What if we don’t need a “return” to anything, but rather need to continue in our unstoppable, inevitable forward motion.

    It’s a truism that as a sentient species, we only have “rear-view” vission (historic “acheivements” with which to determin our progress as a species). And so it’s easy to hark back to times gone by to find the place where it all went wrong, and to wish to revert to the “time before”, and to re-do history, only better, without the”where we went wrong” mistakes…

    But, despite our rear-view vission, we only have forward motion! Religion has demonstrably failed, and has only brought the world friction and fear, and state/god-sanctioned poverty.

    There is a whole new culture emerging on this planet, and though “the jews” have attempted to infiltrate it, it has predominantly absorbed them, as it does many who encounte, into a non-religious, but certainly spiritual, humanistic, egalitarian, ceative, supportive paradigm which is sweeping the world, unrecognised in the mainstream, but entirely visible to those who seek The Authentic (as a way of) Being.

    That part which has been barely visible in the mainstream has been commodified (but not wholy bought) by worshipers of mamon, and a “spiritual supermarket” has flourished, but that infiltration has been unsuccessful in its attempts to derail the progress of free-thought, of observation of a world in tatters, of direct experience of the future which is open to us, and of the
    direct relationship between our will and the movement of a divine force with which we are ALL conected.

    As the saying goes, “the revolution will not be telivised”. The revolunion is being lived right now by countless people across almost all “western” countries, and across large parts of India and other “hippie trail” locations. It is not being televised because it is authentic and ego-less.

    But it is real, and represents an ethos beyond usury, beyond planetary/environmental destruction, beyond government and state.

    Will this movement, this potentially sizmic shift in human thinking be enough? Well, it will probably be enough to ensure its own survival whilst the rest of the world implodes. Beyond that no one in the world has any way of knowing.

    A final note on our rear-view vission problem: Leave something beautiful behind.

    Love,
    Kali.

  167. Kali says:
    @MrVoid

    . It’s mainly because we moved on and found other things that we now prefer. We need to be respectful of all religions,

    Whilst I recognise the reality of the first sentence, I would object to the second.

    We don’t need to be respectful of any “religion”, but respectful to the practitioners of those religions, including judaics.
    We can easily and rightly challenge those beliefs and practices which are “mal-adaptive” or/and supremacist.

    Religions are, at their hearts, ideologies, notions and egoic indulgences, and though they may contain some elements of authentic wisdom, they are, and will remain (in their organised forms) destructive, divisive and ultimately unhelpful in our evolutionary journey.

    And we can say as much to any religious person when discussing the matter, without being personal or condemning of them as individuals.

    Everyone has the right to any delusional “containment of God” they wish, but to continue to allow those orchestrated delusions to guide our progress as a species may prove suicidal.

    Authentic Being, beyond ideology, is of true value. Ideologies may be helpful in our interpretation of the world around us, as we move to recognise what it means to be authentically ourselves, but should not be held on to (or respected) once they have served their purpose.

    I appreciate your comment and your perspective though.

    With love,
    Kali.

  168. Kali says:
    @vot tak

    So giles corey is one of israel’s psywar tools…good to know.

    It’s hard to miss the triple cross on the front cover.

  169. anarchyst says:
    @anon

    The original “message” of Christianity to be open to all did not negate the need for cultural insularity, borders, race-exclusion policies, segregation of the races or other culture-preserving practices.
    It is the twentieth-century bastardization of Christianity by you-know-who that pushed race-mixing and the abolition of cultural norms specific to each race to the forefront of Christianity.
    We are living with the results of those misguided Christian policies to this very day.
    In fact, from a biblical standpoint, multiculturalism and diversity could be considered the “Tower of Babel” to this day.

    • Agree: geokat62
    • Replies: @anon
  170. anon[456] • Disclaimer says:
    @anarchyst

    you-know-who

    Do you? “Salvation is from the Jews.” (((John 4:22)))

    pushed race-mixing

    Haven’t read the New Testament yet? “There is neither Jew nor Greek…ye are all one.” “He made from one man every nation of mankind.” And lets not forget the blatant race-mixing in Acts 13:1 where Simeon the Negro (Νίγερ) is welcomed into church leadership in a Christian congregation in Syria, because Africans were the first to swallow the Jewish cult known as Christianity, as the New Testament plainly states (see comment #142.)

    Christianity is the religion of Negro-loving, as pushed by the magic Rabbi. You fall for it, just like Nancy Pelosi. You’ve been Blacked.

  171. The Christian wears white from baptism to eternal salvation:

    ’13 Then one of the elders answered, saying to me, “Who are these arrayed in white robes, and where did they come from?”

    ’14 And I said to him, “Sir, you know.”

    ‘So he said to me, “These are the ones who come out of the great tribulation, and washed their robes and made them white in the blood of the Lamb.’
    Rev. Chap. 7 NKJV

    • Replies: @anon
  172. anon[383] • Disclaimer says:
    @SeekerofthePresence

    At least I got muh white robe! 🤣


    photo source: 20 Blow-you-away baptism photos | MissionGeek | June 14, 2015

    P.S. Do you think magic robes work better than magic dirt?

  173. If wicked wit can work salvation, you’re in!

    In the Bible earth and robe are both sanctified at the hand of Christ, and both work miracles.

    You have a knack for the Menckenesque statement. Try turning it toward the faith. Christ will take you far beyond what you think you know.

    To challenge your own presuppositions, check out “Evidence that Demands a Verdict” by Josh McDowell.

  174. anon[383] • Disclaimer says:

    The Magical Rabbi will take you right back to Judaism; I’m neither Jewish nor Wannabee-Jew enough to celebrate a foreign middle-eastern desert-people’s holiday. “Christ, our Passover lamb, has been sacrificed.” (1 Cor. 5:7, etal.) You’re as myopic as Kevin McDonald, who in the above article condemns “Jewish ritual murder” and “Blood Passover,” yet appears totally oblivious to how the New Testament defines Christ as exactly that, a rehashed narrative of Blood Passover Jewish ritual murder.

  175. Learning incapable.

    Koalemos bless you on your infinite loop.

    • Replies: @anon
  176. anon[383] • Disclaimer says:
    @SeekerofthePresence

    You’re reduced to ignoble insults. Ironically, the scientifically-confirmed fatuity of you Jew-worshipers is recognized in First Corinthians, first chapter: “Stupidity of preaching…not many of you were wise…not many were noble.” You’ve convinced me that part of the Holy Hook is spot on! 😂

  177. @Alden

    In my understanding of Freemasonry is a very strong impression that it is one of the oldest, if not the oldest, international unions for skilled laborers. It provided nonpublic places for training in teamwork, loyalty, “receiving wages,” organizing for efficient productivity, safe lodging when traveling, cheque cashing when traveling… Didn’t the Freemasons, from Entered Apprentice to Fellowcraft to Master Mason, build the greatest architecture of Europe and Eurasia? I’d be very interested in changing my beliefs about this if you can post information that supports the proposition that “Masonic, Jewish, and Enlightenment history is all rubbish.”

  178. @Kevin Barrett

    Islam, which is rational and corrected Christianity

    LM literal AO.

  179. @Monotheistic Christian

    He will only return when the current nation of Israel is on the verge of total annihilation, with two thirds of them having been wiped out.

    Israel was already totally annihilated 2000 years ago, in 70 A.D., with far more than two thirds of Hebrews killed.

    Jesus expects his followers to “put up the sword” and “turn the other cheek” and if necessary to allow those who hate them to destroy their bodies.

    No, Christ’s last commandment was to “sell your cloak and buy a sword”.

    And “turn the other cheek” is about controlling your passions, not about being a pacifist. People who are truly dangerous and can kill you with a flick of their wrist are some of the gentlest and most mild-mannered people you meet; they’ve learned it the hard way. Soy nu-males wouldn’t understand, their understanding of male behavior comes from female and homosexual stereotypes.

  180. Israel was already totally annihilated 2000 years ago, in 70 A.D., with far more than two thirds of Hebrews killed.

    Did the Jewish survivors “look upon me whom they have pierced and mourn for him, and be in bitterness for him, as one that is in bitterness for his firstborn”? Zechariah 12:10. No they did not.

    The prophecy of the two thirds of Israel being annihilated is in Zechariah 13:8-9. The final blessing of Israel for their obedience then happens immediately in verse 9. In ad 70 the Jews had 2000 years of exile and suffering to look forward to.

    The Jews in Israel have not yet accepted the crucified Jesus as their messiah, but they will one day, when they are in dire straights.

    The day will come, as Zechariah 14:2 prophesies, when half of Jerusalem will be taken, the women ravished, and the half population taken into captivity, as Zechariah 14:2 prophesies.

    Then Jesus will stand again on the mount of Olives, and it will be split in two creating a great valley. Zech 14:4. Nuclear war will happen : “Their flesh shall consume away while they stand upon their feet, and their eyes will consume away in their holes”. Verse 12.

    My Statement :

    Jesus expects his followers to “put up the sword” and “turn the other cheek” and if necessary to allow those who hate them to destroy their bodies.

    No, Christ’s last commandment was to “sell your cloak and buy a sword”.

    You must look at the context in Luke 22. The reason Jesus said it is in the next verse : “For I say unto you, that this that is written (in Isaiah 53:12) must yet be accomplished in me, ‘And he was reckoned among the transgressors: for the things concerning me have an end’.
    And they said, Lord here are two swords. And he said unto them, It is enough.
    ” Luke 22:31-38.

    Why were two swords enough? It was enough to fulfil the scriptures that he would be numbered among the transgressors, which would include the thieves on the crosses, but also Peter attacking the High Priest’s servant with the sword. Two swords were not enough to attack and overcome the mob that was coming to arrest Jesus, but enough to get them accused of transgression.

    Contrary to what you say, Jesus’s final commandment on this matter was to Peter, “Put up again thy sword into his place: for they that take the sword shall perish with the sword”. Matt 26:52.

    And “turn the other cheek” is about controlling your passions, not about being a pacifist.

    How can you “control your passions” while you are attacking or killing somebody, even in self-defence?

    People who are truly dangerous and can kill you with a flick of their wrist are some of the gentlest and most mild-mannered people you meet; they’ve learned it the hard way. Soy nu-males wouldn’t understand, their understanding of male behavior comes from female and homosexual stereotypes.

    Uh!

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Kevin MacDonald Comments via RSS
PastClassics
The unspoken statistical reality of urban crime over the last quarter century.
The Shaping Event of Our Modern World
Analyzing the History of a Controversial Movement