The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 Tobias Langdon Archive
Oppressed Jew Is Watching You
What Orwell Got Wrong in his Dystopian Satire Nineteen Eighty-Four
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information

Oppressed Jew Is Watching You: the sinister American Attorney-General Merrick Garland

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

When it was first published in 1949, George Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four was a dystopian satire aimed at the left. In 2022, the novel seems to have become an instruction manual used by the left. For example, in Orwell’s satire the worst of all offences is thoughtcrime, the denial of official ideology and rebellion against the self-proclaimed wisdom and virtue of the state. The modern left have invented many forms of thoughtcrime to justify censorship and their own control. And the supreme form of thoughtcrime today is racism. In Britain, leftists have concealed and even collaborated with decades of organized rape and child-prostitution because the criminals are brown-skinned Muslims and their victims are White.

Rape is merely a crime against the body, after all. Accepting that Muslims – and other non-Whites – are much more likely to commit rape would be a crime against the central leftist principle of racial equality. But in fact that principle is routinely betrayed by leftists themselves, because they use what Orwell called doublethink, the “holding of two opinions” that cancel out, “knowing them to be contradictory and believing in both of them.” It’s a central principle of leftism that there’s only one race – the Human Race. We’re all the same under the skin, capable of exactly the same high achievements and exactly the same misdeeds. At the same time, leftism clearly acts on the belief that Whites are innately vicious and non-Whites are innately virtuous. Critical Race Theory demands, inter alia, that Whites be stripped of power and punished in perpetuity for enslaving Blacks, despite the fact that all races have practised slavery and only one race – Whites – ever sought to abolish it.

Labour now hates the working-class

Meanwhile, the Labour Party in Britain seems to have modelled itself on the ministries overseen by IngSoc in Nineteen Eighty-Four, where “The Ministry of Peace concerns itself with war, the Ministry of Truth with lies, the Ministry of Love with torture and the Ministry of Plenty with starvation.” By name, the Labour Party in Britain is still the dedicated champion of the working-class. By nature, however, it is now the vicious enemy of the working-class, as the Jewish Labour peer Maurice Glasman admitted in 2011: “In many ways [Labour] viewed working-class voters as an obstacle to progress. Their commitment to various civil rights, anti-racism, meant that often working-class voters… were seen as racist, resistant to change, homophobic and generally reactionary. So in many ways you had a terrible situation where a Labour government was hostile to the English working class.”

So Labour now hates laborers just as the Ministry of Truth hated truth. But Orwell could have gone further in explaining the roots of leftism’s hatred of truth and love of power. I believe he made one big mistake in the book: he assigned the wrong names and races to two of its most important characters. The chief villain is a gentile called O’Brien and the chief heretic is a Jew called Goldstein. If it had been the other way around, Nineteen Eighty-Four would have been much closer to reality, both back then and right now. Jews are not heretics in the modern West, but hunters of heretics. If Orwell had made Goldstein the villain and O’Brien the heretic, he would have created an uncannily accurate prophecy of twenty-first century America, where Jews wield hugely disproportionate power in a government resolutely committed to harming and demeaning the White majority. The sinister Jew Merrick Garland oversees the corrupt American legal system and hunts down White dissidents even as the sinister Jew Alejandro Mayorkas oversees “Homeland Security” and allows illegal migrants to flood across the southern border.

Information Is Power

And if Goldstein had been the villain, Orwell would also have prophesied the central Jewish involvement in the surveillance state. In Nineteen Eighty-Four, the Party spies incessantly on its own members, determined to detect and punish the slightest challenge to its power. As Winston Smith thinks to himself: “You had to live – did live, from habit that became instinct – in the assumption that every sound you made was overheard, and, except in darkness, every movement scrutinized.” In the real twenty-first century, Western intelligence-agencies and web-companies are doing their best to bring Orwell’s dystopian visions of omni-surveillance to life. And Jews have always been at the center of this spying, as a recent investigation by independent media has once again confirmed: “A MintPress study has found that hundreds of former agents of the notorious Israeli spying organization, Unit 8200, have attained positions of influence in many of the world’s biggest tech companies, including Google, Facebook, Microsoft and Amazon.”

Information is power and spying allows Israel to blackmail or subvert politicians, steal military and technological secrets, and profit from advance knowledge of movements in the financial markets. The jailed Jewish sex-predator Harvey Weinstein employed Jewish spies against his victims, including some recommended by the former Israeli prime minister Ehud Barak. The late Jewish sex-predator Jeffrey Epstein very likely worked for Israeli intelligence, filming and blackmailing corrupt goyim like Bill Clinton and Prince Andrew. Epstein collaborated with the jailed Jewish sex-predator Ghislaine Maxwell, daughter of the Jewish mega-fraudster Robert Maxwell (né Binyamin Hoch), who sold software with hidden access for Israeli intelligence to governments around the world.

“Vile prejudice against the despised Hebrew”

Spying is as Jewish as lox on bagel, but Nineteen Eighty-Four, the world’s greatest satire on the surveillance state, makes the Jewish Goldstein the opponent of totalitarianism and the goy O’Brien its cruel embodiment. So why did Orwell get the names and races the wrong way round? I think he’d succumbed the same pressure as Charles Dickens (1812-70), a great White writer from an earlier era who portrayed Jews accurately as villains in his early work, was made to feel guilty for it by aggrieved Jews, and mistakenly tried to make amends in his final book. A Jewish master-criminal called Fagin was the central villain of Dickens’ Oliver Twist (1839) and was called “the Jew” over three hundred times in early editions. I’ve also argued in “Minority Malice: The Curious Case of Daniel Quilp” that Dickens secretly intended Quilp, the demonic dwarf of The Old Curiosity Shop (1841), to be a Jewish villain too. Dickens would have felt the need for secrecy because he’d been strongly criticized for his accurate portrayal of Jewish criminality in Oliver Twist. One Jewish critic said that Fagin “encouraged a vile prejudice against the despised Hebrew.” The guilt-tripping worked: Dickens softened the references to Fagin’s Jewishness in later editions of Oliver Twist and in Our Mutual Friend (1865), his final (and unfinished) book, he created a highly positive Jewish character called Riah, which is Hebrew for “friend”.

George Orwell underwent the same rehabilitation as Dickens. In his early work, he succumbed to the virus of anti-Semitism, was heavily criticized for it, and has been criticized ever since. As the Jewish journalist Raymond S. Solomon complained in the Jerusalem Post in 2019: “To be aware that Orwell had an antisemitic streak, you only have to read Down and Out in Paris and London, in which the term ‘the Jew’ is used many times.” But what critics like Solomon call “anti-Semitism” is better described as accuracy and honesty. Here are three examples of “anti-Semitism” from Down and Out in Paris and London (1933), Orwell’s chronicle of his time living in poverty in those two cities:

I had to do what I could on thirty-six francs a week from the English lessons. Being inexperienced, I handled the money badly, and sometimes I was a day without food. When this happened I used to sell a few of my clothes, smuggling them out of the hotel in small packets and taking them to a secondhand shop in the rue de la Montagne St Geneviève. The shopman was a red-haired Jew, an extraordinary disagreeable man, who used to fall into furious rages at the sight of a client. From his manner one would have supposed that we had done him some injury by coming to him. “Merde!” he used to shout, “you here again? What do you think this is? A soup kitchen?” And he paid incredibly low prices. For a hat which I had bought for twenty-five shillings and scarcely worn he gave five francs; for a good pair of shoes, five francs; for shirts, a franc each. He always preferred to exchange rather than buy, and he had a trick of thrusting some useless article into one’s hand and then pretending that one had accepted it. Once I saw him take a good overcoat from an old woman, put two white billiard-balls into her hand, and then push her rapidly out of the shop before she could protest. It would have been a pleasure to flatten the Jew’s nose, if only one could have afforded it. (Part 1, ch. 3)

On some mornings Boris [a Russian friend of Orwell’s] collapsed in the most utter despair. He would lie in bed almost weeping, cursing the Jew with whom he lived. Of late the Jew had become restive about paying the daily two francs, and, what was worse, had begun putting on intolerable airs of patronage. Boris said that I, as an Englishman, could not conceive what torture it was to a Russian of family to be at the mercy of a Jew.

“A Jew, mon ami, a veritable Jew! And he hasn’t even the decency to be ashamed of it. To think that I, a captain in the Russian Army — have I ever told you, mon ami, that I was a captain in the Second Siberian Rifles? Yes, a captain, and my father was a colonel. And here I am, eating the bread of a Jew. A Jew…

“I will tell you what Jews are like. Once, in the early months of the war, we were on the march, and we had halted at a village for the night. A horrible old Jew, with a red beard like Judas Iscariot, came sneaking up to my billet. I asked him what he wanted. ‘Your honour,’ he said, ‘I have brought a girl for you, a beautiful young girl only seventeen. It will only be fifty francs.’ ‘Thank you,’ I said, ‘you can take her away again. I don’t want to catch any diseases.’ ‘Diseases!’ cried the Jew, ‘mais, monsieur le capitaine, there’s no fear of that. It’s my own daughter!’ That is the Jewish national character for you.

“Have I ever told you, mon ami, that in the old Russian Army it was considered bad form to spit on a Jew? Yes, we thought a Russian officer’s spittle was too precious to be wasted on Jews…” etc. etc. (Part 1. ch. 6)

Like many misers, Roucolle came to a bad end through putting his money into a wildcat scheme. One day a Jew appeared in the quarter, an alert, business-like young chap who had a first-rate plan for smuggling cocaine into England. … The old man was half frantic between greed and fear. His bowels yearned at the thought of getting, perhaps, fifty thousand francs’ profit, and yet he could not bring himself to risk the money. He used to sit in a comer with his head in his hands, groaning and sometimes yelling out in agony, and often he would kneel down (he was very pious) and pray for strength, but still he couldn’t do it. But at last, more from exhaustion than anything else, he gave in quite suddenly; he slit open the mattress where his money was concealed and handed over six thousand francs to the Jew.

The Jew delivered the cocaine the same day, and promptly vanished. And meanwhile, as was not surprising after the fuss Roucolle had made, the affair had been noised all over the quarter. The very next morning the hotel was raided and searched by the police. … At the station, Roucolle and [his Polish collaborator] were interrogated by the Commissaire while a tin of the cocaine was sent away to be analysed. … After an hour a policeman came back with the tin of cocaine and a note from the analyst. He was laughing.

“This is not cocaine, monsieur,” he said.

“What, not cocaine?” said the Commissaire. “Mais, alors — what is it, then?”

“It is face-powder.”

Roucolle and the Pole were released at once, entirely exonerated but very angry. The Jew had double-crossed them. Afterwards, when the excitement was over, it turned out that he had played the same trick on two other people in the quarter. (Part 1, ch. 23)

One Jewish reader of the first edition of Down and Out immediately wrote a letter to its Jewish publisher Victor Gollancz, complaining about Orwell’s “insulting and odious remarks about Jews” and even threatened legal action. Such critics didn’t object, for example, to Orwell calling the shopkeeper “an extraordinary disagreeable man” and recording the way he abused and exploited his customers, but they thought Orwell should have suppressed or goywashed the shopkeeper’s Jewishness. That’s part of minority-worship, which insists that minorities are always virtuous victims of the cruel and oppressive majority. But minority-worship is a lie, because minorities often behave badly and harm the majority. And, as Steve Sailer has often asked, if minorities, and Jews in particular, cannot be criticized, shamed or mocked for behaving badly, when will they mend their ways? The obvious answer is: Never.

Jewish journalist Anshell Pfeffer thinks that George Orwell had an ugly side
Jewish journalist Anshell Pfeffer thinks that George Orwell had an ugly side

As things are, it’s honest writers like Orwell, Dickens, and Sailer who are shamed and mocked for telling the truth about minority misbehavior. That’s why Dickens capitulated to his Jewish critics and created such a positive Jewish character for his final novel and why, I would suggest, Orwell made Goldstein a victim and O’Brien a villain in his own final novel. O’Brien is, in fact, intended to be a hidden portrait of a Catholic priest, a Jesuit intellectual overseeing a new Inquisition, because Orwell was attacking and satirizing both communism and Catholicism in the novel. He thought both ideologies were totalitarian and tyrannical. Yet he saw degrees of deplorability within Catholicism and gave this shocking remark to one of the characters in his novel A Clergyman’s Daughter (1935): “For the beastliest type the world has yet produced give me the Roman Catholic Jew.” The remark was suppressed by the publisher and never saw print, but it raises the same question as Orwell’s alleged bigotry in Down and Out. Was it anti-Semitism or accuracy and honesty? The Jewish journalist Anshell Pfeffer is in no doubt that it was anti-Semitism:

Other contemporaries record Orwell, at late stages of his life, remarking to them about the preponderance of Jews working for the Observer newspaper for which he wrote, and indeed in his diaries he refers to the control of Jews over vast swathes of the media. … Even in his last years (he died in 1950) Orwell was always quick to identify people, gratuitously, as Jews, in a way in which their Jewishness is seen an explanation to their situation, actions or appearance. … Hearing a rumor in 1940 that “Jews greatly predominate among the people sheltering in the Tube [underground station],” Orwell notes: “Must try and verify this.” Ten days later, he is down in the depths of the transport system to examine “the crowds sheltering in Chancery Lane, Oxford Circus and Baker Street stations. Not all Jews, but, I think, a higher proportion of Jews than one would normally see in a crowd of this size.” He goes on, with almost cold objectivity, to note that Jews have a way of making themselves conspicuous. (Was Orwell an anti-Semite?, Haaretz, 3rd August 2012)

The headline of the article asks “Was Orwell an anti-Semite?” and Pfeffer answers that Orwell definitely was. I think Pfeffer is wrong – or rather, I think that he’s accusing Orwell of thoughtcrime for being accurate and honest about reality. It’s not “gratuitous” to record the race of a human being, because race is often central to explaining human behavior. Orwell wanted to understand the world, which is why his writing now falls foul of that core commandment of modern leftism: “Thou shalt not recognize patterns.” The leftist Patrick Cockburn condemned Orwell for writing a “list of notable writers and other people he considered to be unsuitable as possible writers for the anti-communist propaganda activities of the Information Research Department, a secret propaganda organisation of the British state under the Foreign Office.” To Cockburn’s disgust, Orwell thought that the race and sexual orientation of people on the list were worth recording. In other words, Orwell was trying to recognize patterns and understand why some groups were more attracted to the murderous tyranny of communism than others.

Minorities committing mass murder

For leftists, Orwell was being “racist” and “homophobic.” He was refusing to bow in the cult of minority-worship and suppress the very obvious fact that minorities can behave badly and harm the majority. Indeed, communism is a glaring example of the way that minorities can tyrannize the majority and commit mass murder against it. As I pointed out in “Minority Rites: Modern Lessons from the Bolshevik Revolution,” the slaughter of millions of Russians and Ukrainians under communism was overseen by ethnic outsiders like Jews, Georgians, and Latvians. The most important of those outsiders were Jews, who played a necessary, if not sufficient, part in the triumph of communism.

Criticizing minorities like that is thoughtcrime to modern leftists. As Timothy Garton-Ash, another leftist commentator, said of Orwell’s list: “One aspect … that shocks our contemporary sensibility is his ethnic labeling of people, especially the eight variations of ‘Jewish?’ (Charlie Chaplin), ‘Polish Jew,’ ‘English Jew,’ or ‘Jewess.’” Garton-Ash is right: “contemporary sensibility” – that is, leftist sensibility – is indeed shocked by any attempt to be accurate and honest about racial reality. Jews were central to the mass-murdering tyranny of communism and Orwell’s private list seems to have brought that uncomfortable fact before the eyes of a few officials. It’s just a pity that his public novel Nineteen Eighty-Four didn’t bring the same uncomfortable fact before the eyes of millions of his readers.

(Republished from The Occidental Observer by permission of author or representative)
Hide 240 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. of course, at the end, Orwell took the (((ticket))): because he wanted his late masterpiece to be advertised, distributed, and sold.

    but not everyone does so. Solzhenitsyn refused to truckle to the Eternal Jew and, as a result,

    his last work, 200 Years Together, which shines a searchlight on the JP in Russian history,

    has yet to be published commercially in English. And

    somewhat the same with the great investigative journalist Douglas Reed….

    who, after his late anti-Jew epiphany – The Controversey of Zion – saw his career terminated

    and the ms suppressed.

  2. Notsofast says:

    me thinks you may be underestimating the subtlety of orwell. please indulge me on this for a moment. it has been suggested that jewish people, sometimes take irish surnames, to disguise their heritage. “goldstein” on the other hand leads the “rebellion” against the suffocating totalitarian police state. somehow goldstein manages to elude the authorities, that have monitored winston smith’s every move, allowing him only enough rope to hang himself. to me the implication is that goldstein is a front used to round up trouble makers.

  3. …It began to dawn

    The language itself had been made a weapon

    Against them, their aesthetics and morals.

    The Enemy understood Orwell

    Not as a warning but his blueprint,

    And at last it came home that his intent

    Was no less than their spiritual death

    By torture until they confessed that truth

    Was calumny, corruption was beauty,

    Infertility and sodomy their duty–

    The last, bastard, effeminate sons

    Begging for their humiliations

    Till extinction….

    • Thanks: Emslander
    • Replies: @Doug Ryler
  4. As an ardent fan of George Orwell I would like to mention two points in his defense: That the “chief heretic” bears a Jewish name isn’t an unjust glorification of Jews, as those haven’t written only the worst and most vitriolic pieces, but also the best and most enlighting ones (Norman Finkelstein, Ron Unz, etc.) So also Dickens’s character “Riah” is completely justified. Secondly, it’s a good trick from the author to give a likeable and trustworthy name to the super-villain, because then his demasking causes a shockingly surprising effect on the reader. The characterization of the bad guy as a “Jewish-Marxist intellectual” isn’t hinted at so much by giving him a Jewish name, which would be too simple, but by mentioning his constant playing with his glasses when takling to Winston…

    • Replies: @BH46
  5. I read Down and Out in the early 80s, in my late teens, and I don’t recall those comments about Jews at all. Is it because I had no comprehension then of the JQ? Or had Holohoax fiction brainwashed me to think only fine things about Jews? Or was my copy censored?

    It’s quite confronting to see one’s past arise like that and ponder how one lived in such ignorance.

    Good article by the way. Thanks.

    • Replies: @neutral
  6. Outstanding article, keep up the good work!

    • Agree: Petermx, profnasty
  7. @Notsofast

    Only Irish surnames taken by Jews to hide themselves? They take all kinds of surnames. ‘Goldstein’ is most likely used by Orwell because the main ‘traitor’ in Stalin’s assessment by the time of the Spanish Civil War was Jew Leon Trotsky.

    But the stress always should be on the fact that this totalitarianism Orwell writes about is Ingsoc – English socialism. It is part and parcel of the development of Modern Anglo-Saxon culture; it is native born and bred. It was not carried by a foreign race into an idyllic land of freedom and opposition to brutal domestic politics that serve brutal worldwide imperialism. England is and always has been a land of brutal domestic politics that serve brutal imperialism. And certainly since the first printing presses hit London, the English have been masters of propaganda, including steering the masses they rule to accept whatever the elites want.

    As for Orwell using an Irish surname for the archvillian: Orwell hated Marxism after seeing it up close, and he also feared both the horror of the British Empire (under which he was a soldier and torturer) and the the rise of ‘English socialism’ for its syrupy claims to need power in order to do good. But Orwell was first and foremost was Modern agnostic Anglo-Saxon, and what he hated most was Catholicism, and the Catholics he hated most were Irish.

  8. Odd to hear rape described as a crime “merely against the body”. This is a travesty–rape is a brutal violation of the will of a resisting human being–it is a tyrannical assertion of dominance that enjoys the fact that is this domination as much as it enjoys the forced sexual congress.

    • Agree: animalogic
    • Replies: @Right_On
  9. @Haxo Angmark

    I understand there’s a new edition of 200 Years Together in the offing.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  10. Franz says:
    @Kinky Friedman

    Orwell was first and foremost was Modern agnostic Anglo-Saxon, and what he hated most was Catholicism, and the Catholics he hated most were Irish.

    Interesting point.

    The charge has been leveled at Tom Paine too. His atheism/agnosticism was almost exclusively due to Paine’s hatred of the Scots. I’ve often wondered what Scotland did to poor old Tom to rile him up that way.

    People who insist Tom Paine was the real author of the Declaration of Independence usually point that part out.

  11. Right_On says:
    @inspector general

    Odd to hear rape described as a crime “merely against the body”.

    Not, of course, Tobias Langdon’s own dismissive view. He was being ironic (always a hazardous thing to attempt online) and pointing out that Leftists regard thoughtcrime – hate speech – as far more heinous than physical violence. They ignored Muslim “grooming” gangs for fear of appearing “racist”.

    • Agree: Weave
  12. Trinity says:

    Emanuel Goldstein was CONTROLLED OPPOSITION, not a hero at all. Kind of like Donald Trumpstein, Ron DeIsraelis, etc.

    I think it was fitting to give the character a Jewish name.

    • Agree: Kali
    • Thanks: Sarah
    • Replies: @Buck Ransom
  13. Trinity says:

    A White “leftist” in 2022 is just another name for COWARD. I actually consider myself more liberal than anything else, that is why I oppose (((White Genocide))) and think America fought on the wrong side of WWII. There isn’t a (((“left”))) but there is a right and a wrong. We all know the so called “right” and “left” in the West is controlled by Jewish Supremacists. So the game is rigged and Emanuel Goldstein was part of Big Brother. So is Trump & Company.

    • Thanks: Lancelot_Link
    • LOL: RedNordid1488
    • Replies: @NeoconsNailed
  14. JWalters says:
    @Haxo Angmark

    Fully agree about Douglas Reed.

    An anonymous masterpiece of research is
    When Victims Rule

    • Replies: @Skeptikal
  15. JimDandy says:
    @Haxo Angmark

    Is an English translation available?

    • Replies: @Che Guava
  16. Ghali says:

    What a bigoted racist polemic. Ron Unz should be ashamed for posting this kind of Fascistic hatred towards Muslims. According to police data in Australia, Canada and the USA, the majority of rapes, paedophilia, girls kidnapping and human trafficking are committed by Caucasian (Whites) criminals.

    • Agree: Druid55
    • Troll: Trinity, Che Guava
  17. Darren Beattie: Merrick Garland’s ‘Pattern of Horribles.’

    Video Link

  18. mephisto says:
    @Haxo Angmark

    Hmmm. If I recall correctly, having read 1984 so many damn years ago, Goldstein was a creation of Obrien. The book supposedly written by Goldstein was in fact written by Obrien and others party leaders. Goldstein and Big Brother were in fact fictional, eternal God-like ideas constantly in battles which were used to subjugate the masses.
    So in fact, Orwell cleverly exposed the Chosen by disguising him as a good one, while in fact, the good Chosen was a fiction.
    Correct me if I’m wrong.

    • Agree: Charles
    • Replies: @Charles
  19. Chriss says:

    Nigga but Zelensky,…/.he teetered on the brink.../

    Israeli lawmakers tear into Zelensky for Holocaust comparisons in Knesset speech

    If Zelensky’s speech had been delivered in normal times, it would have been said that he teetered on the brink of Holocaust denial (…) War is always terrible, shelling and occupation are monstrous for the Ukrainian people, but any comparison of an ordinary war, however difficult, to annihilation million Jews in gas chambers as part of the Final Solution is a complete distortion of history.

    Zelensky then appealed to Israeli lawmakers for assistance and criticized them for failing to arm his country, refusing to take in large numbers of refugees, and opting out of many of the biting sanctions against Russia and its interests that have been imposed by the West.

    “I’m sure you feel our pain, but can you explain why we’re still waiting… for your help… when other countries are giving help? Why isn’t Israeli help, or even entry permits, forthcoming?” he asked.

    “What is it? Indifference? Political calculation? Mediation without choosing sides?” Zelensky added.

    “I’ll leave you to provide the answers to these questions, but I want to point out that indifference kills. Calculations can be wrong. You can mediate between countries, but not between good and evil.”

  20. JR Foley says:

    Whites wiped out 5 million Indians –Natives of USA –setting up shop for Obama and his Entitled Society–if you get my drift. Justin Trudeau perhaps has a Jewish father–Mick Jagger…

  21. Brosi says:

    How can da Goyim rollback centuries of self-censoring and outright censorship? He can da Goyim restore some semblance of balance to history and zeitgeist?

    Lets face it, the NSDAP were right. Let the purge begin.

    • Replies: @Kim
  22. We are already living in a hellworld, one where all that is wrong, false, ugly, and foul is upheld as righteous. In the most fundamental way this hellworld is worse than George Orwell’s because at least IngSoc (that is, The Party) did not intent to drive the core population of Oceania (their domain comprised of the Anglosphere and Latin America) into extinction. Jews intend to do just that, and have already gone a long way in making their goal a reality. They forsook God when they rejected the Messiah and are now damned; we are not and no revenge against us will ever be enough.

  23. Why america FAILED by Morris Berman.

    • Replies: @Realist
  24. Alrenous says: • Website

    So why did Orwell get the names and races the wrong way round?

    Good work, slave. Way to gore the cape and not the matador.

    Rape is merely a crime against the body, after all.

    Therefore if thine enemy hunger, feed him; if he thirst [for poon], give him [pussy]: for in so doing thou shalt heap coals of fire on his head. Romans 12:10
    because the mind set on the flesh is hostile toward God; for it does not subject itself to the law of God, for it is not even able to do so, Romans 8:7

    would be a crime against the central leftist principle of racial equality

    All are equal before God, after all.

    Egalitarianism suggests that, since one person was at one point a king, everyone is a king. As Christianity always was, this is pure nonsense. It does nothing to erase the Reality of hierarchy. However, it does create a desperate need to camouflage the hierarchy.

    You are allowed to criticize the king as much as you want. If he reacts to criticism, you have found power, that’s inEgalitarian, and you can form a coalition to usurp him.

    They instead have this bright idea: protected classes. In other words the king himself is below reproach, but his gardener is protected. His serving-maid is protected, his page is protected, and his butler, certainly, is protected.

    You can see how this actually works by looking at places like Martha’s Vinyard and Georgetown. Washington DC is over 50% Bantu. Very…diverse. And yet Georgetown is mainly white, with a bunch of asians and some brahmin, with just a few Obama-like mulattos as token blacks. Very obviously [one of the good ones] is in full force. Integration for thee but not for me.
    Then they send their little pets to do their bidding, and anyone objecting to their actions is Racist. What heresy.

    If a Jew decided to take on real power, they would be Martha’s Vinyard’d instantly, the same way you would be and the Venezuelans were. They are employed precisely so that idiots like you will Goldstein them.

    Yes, Orwell was extremely accurate. Winston wonders if Goldstein, if he were ever real, was in fact an employee of MiniTru. Being hated is his job. Hired to do it.

    Even if you manage – using your impotent cargo-cult folk activism tactics – to throw the Jews down the well, you will find all you’ve done is to merk Stalin’s gardener. Your whole family will be disappeared, and then he will hire a new one.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  25. In Down and out in Paris and London he quotes a proverb:

    Trust a snake before a Jew and a Jew before a Greek, but don’t trust an Armenian.

    I don’t see Greeks and Armenians complaining.

    • LOL: Che Guava
  26. It’s rather obvious that Big Brother is modelled on Stalin and Goldstein on Trotsky. O’Brien is false opposition and agent provocateur trying to catch dissidents.

    Orwell probably had Trotskyite sympathies and hated Stalinism because of the elimination of his anarchist comerades during the Spanish civil war.

    Here is the list Orwell prepared:

    Perhaps someone more familiar with these names could establish if they were all Stalinists and Stalinist sympathisers/apologists. Did he put any Trotskyites and other non-Stalinist communists on the list? By the end of the war Stalinists were the overall majority in the communists movements so for Orwell “anti-communism” would have become synonymous with “anti-Stalinism” although he may have still had some Marxist and socialist leanings himself. I guess the list was just revenge for the Stalinist purges which nearly had him eliminated in Barcelona.

    • Replies: @Che Guava
    , @Durruti
  27. zard says:

    The white Christians still are unable to comprehend that their religion which preaches egalitarian ideals (Romans 10:12), the elevation of an immaterial afterlife (heaven) over the actual material world & Judeophilia (‘Salvation is from the Jews’– John 4:22) is responsible for this Jewish managed multi racial mess & cultural chaos/degeneracy the West & the white race finds itself in today.

    • Agree: Zumbuddi
    • Thanks: RedNordid1488
    • Replies: @Kinky Friedman
  28. Zane says:

    Was Orwell anti-semantic?

  29. neutral says:
    @Change that Matters

    I had no comprehension then of the JQ?

    It was very difficult to do then, there were no places like this to find, all the mass media was under total jewish control, which is why the ADL and other jews are pushing so hard to censor the entire internet.

    • Agree: HammerJack
    • Replies: @Rev. Spooner
  30. @Haxo Angmark

    Douglas Reed’s The Controversy of Zion can be read in PDF here:

    A must read for any serious “anti-Semite”!

    (Jonathan Greenblatt are you watching?)

  31. @Notsofast

    In my understanding Goldstein is the archetype of “controlled opposition”, an advanced Jewish tactic of total dominance.

    • Agree: Arthur MacBride
    • Thanks: Sarah
  32. Brosi says:

    Speaking of oppressed Jews…

    Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla Honored With ADL’S Courage Against Hate Award

    “Throughout history, when people are angry or afraid, they look for someone to blame, and the pandemic was no different,” said Jonathan Greenblatt, ADL CEO, in presenting the award. “Dr. Bourla could have simply ignored these campaigns of disinformation and hate, but instead, he courageously spoke out. He pushed back against the conspiracy theories aimed at undermining public trust in the vaccine, and clearly denounced the odious Holocaust comparisons. And he encouraged public education efforts to counter the dangerous lies.”

    Hmmm. Who hates who?


    Who made who, who made you?
    Who made who, ain’t nobody told you?
    Who made who, who made you?
    If you made them and they made you
    Who picked up the bill and who made who?
    Who made who, who turned the screw?

  33. @Kinky Friedman

    Well spotted.

    Though an interesting post by Tobias I’m afraid he’s missed the point of Orwell’s (Eric Blair) use of O’Brien.

    I’d recommend to all this excellent analysis of Orwell BIG BROTHERS: George Orwell and Christopher Hitchens Exposed

    Orwell was an English imperialist propagandist driven by hatred.

    But if he never was a leftist, why did he call himself one? For Orwell, the red star was protective coloration. It allowed him to smuggle his hates into print, gave them a fine radical gloss, and spared him the cold, clear readings his essays deserved. (Only academics believe that writers want to be understood. Writers want to be misread to their advantage.)

    Ah, but what about Spain? Orwell put his life fighting for POUM in the Spanish Civil War. He got himself shot in the neck-pretty high risks for a phony socialist. How do I explain that one?

    Actually, it’s simple. Orwell went to Spain to fight for his most deeply held belief, yes. Unfortunately, that belief wasn’t socialism but the nastiest, most puerile of the tribal hatreds English babies learn in the cradle: anti-Catholicism.

    The revolution in Catalonia was unlike any other socialist rebellion before or since. Its fury was reserved for priests, nuns, churches and monasteries, and the anarchists Orwell loved were famous for inventing new ways to kill clerics. That’s what drew Orwell to Catalonia: the chance to help the men who were disemboweling priests in Barcelona and winding their guts around the altars. At last, a chance to smite the bloody Papists, the whore of Rome, Eric Blair’s oldest and dearest hate. Not since Cromwell had an English Papist-baiter had such an opportunity to torment the filthy priests. Naturally, Orwell was on the first ship he could catch. It wasn’t about socialism, it was about the chance to kill “a stinking RC” (Orwell’s description of Wyndham Lewis).

    Back in my naive Anglophile days, these sudden blurts of hate for our Church hurt quite a bit, but nowhere near as much as the sudden fits of vicious anti-Irish hate I came across. Of course, they go together, “Catholic” and “Irish,” which has always been handy for the English bigot.

    Orwell hates the Irish too, of course, but much more slyly. Most of them he classes with tramps as human waste; only the Nationalists, the rebels, earn his active hate. It boils over in a strange context, his review of Sean O’Casey, in which he bizarrely turns O’Casey into an Irish Nationalist and attributes O’Casey’s English fame to guilt (when in fact O’Casey’s plays and memoirs were grimly devoted to revenge on the Nationalists, who seduced O’Casey’s hero, Connolly).

    But his most revealing slip came when he had to pick a name for the apparatchik-interrogator villain for 1984. Consider the real names of the men who have governed Britain-and then explain why Orwell named his villain “O’Brien.” Bad conscience trumped sense yet again. He hates the O’Briens so much that he foolishly imagines they’re going to rise to the top in the coming Soviet Britain and take their revenge on the Orwells (or should I say the Blairs). It’s silly-but then Orwell is quite a silly man.

    (My bold)

    In 1984 Orwell’s provincial xenophobia led him to come up with the worst dystopian prediction in history, when he depicted Soviet totalitarianism led by the Irish rebel O’Brien as England’s future. Oblivious to the huge cruelties of Britain, he went far afield again-as when researching the tortures of the Inquisition-to find his bogeyman. It was a typically fatuous self-indulgent, reactionary impulse. The xenophobia starts in the very first line of 1984, the famous opening: “It was a cold, bright day in April and the clocks were striking thirteen.” Oh the horror of the continental (Papist) 24-hour clock! Anything but that! He was lucky in his tuberculosis. If this fool would have lived any longer, his stupidity would have become obvious to all.

    On that note, it was bizarre of Tobias to align Orwell, Dickens and Steve Sailer.

    As things are, it’s honest writers like Orwell, Dickens, and Sailer who are shamed and mocked for telling the truth about minority misbehavior.

    Sailer absolutely worships Jews. For Sailer, Jews are the apogee of HBD. Jews are the apex of biological destiny, deserved rulers of the world due to their Darwinian “survival of the fittest” breeding. Though Sailer, unlike Orwell, is clearly a decent and honest man with a generous and caring nature.

    For Sailer, minorities like negroes and Irish should have been consigned to die out like the Tasmanian Tiger, the only thing keeping them going being some crazy misunderstanding his god-jews, rightful rulers of Judeo-America, have failed to understand. Sailer sees his purpose in life as to gently enlighten his god-jews to the facts of HBD and how the lesser races shouldn’t be given such advantages to the demerit of people like Sailer and Derbyshire, the downtrodden philosemitic Anglos of this world.

    But, Sailer is a good bloke, I like him a lot. Unlike Derbyshire and Orwell, the scum of imperialist London.

    • Disagree: JM
    • Thanks: Thor Walhovd
  34. Anonymous[352] • Disclaimer says:
    @Bill Jones

    I understand there’s a new edition of 200 Years Together in the offing.

    Updated to include the NATO proxy war against Russia? 😀

  35. Did Orwell own a boat?

    • Replies: @Realist
  36. @Kinky Friedman

    O’Brians just aren’t what they used to be, though.

    Top o’ the mornin’ to you, Mikey!

    • Replies: @Anon
    , @Gary Sudder
  37. @Ghali

    Sadly, you failed to pay any attention at all way back in grade school, so you have no idea what the word proportion means.

  38. Jim H says:

    ‘Jews were central to the mass-murdering tyranny of communism.’ — Tobias Langdon

    Presumably the alert reader is to apply this assertion to the sinister Merrick Beria Garland, though his name does not appear in the final paragraph, and indeed but once in the entire text.

    Orwell’s choice of Goldstein as the enemy of the state in 1984 always clanged a false note. Langdon’s background on how this odd choice might have come about is enlightening.

    Contemporary policing of ‘anti-Semitism’ [a ridiculous euphemism] does not allow predatory Jews to be explicitly identified as such. In that respect, 1984 failed to foresee a future in which no one named Goldstein can possibly be vilified as a social enemy.

    Here in that differently dystopian present, rat-faced Merrick Beria Garland — the black-eyed little Bolshevik — likely plans to take down the caricaturish Aryan Christian prince Donald J Trump with criminal charges, as soon as this month.

    In doing so, ‘Garland’ [ Garfinkel] perverts justice with the familiar murderous personal vindictiveness of his kind, thus subverting our institutions from within according to the dicta of his destructive Soviet forebears.

  39. geokat62 says:

    Oppressed Jew Is Watching You

    The sinister Jew Merrick Garland oversees the corrupt American legal system and hunts down White dissidents even as the sinister Jew Alejandro Mayorkas oversees “Homeland Security” and allows illegal migrants to flood across the southern border.

    … more like Supremacist Jews Are Oppressing You, Goy

    • Agree: Chuck Orloski
  40. @Commentator Mike

    They probably would if you gave them a few trillion dollars and control of the mass media. Now there’s something to complain about!

  41. Marcali says:

    Try to compute the propensity for each. You will be more informed.

  42. @Ghali

    Are you trying to make Muslims look dumb for
    some reason? [I presume from your name that you are Muslim]. Your comment is otherwise outstandingly idiotic. Of course you are probably right about the rape and other sex offence stats if only because Muslims are such small minorities in Canada, Australia and the United States.

    • LOL: JM
  43. Kim says:

    The Allied post-war book burnings and plunderings of German libraries.

    • Thanks: Brosi
  44. @Franz

    It’s a Germanic thing of wishing there had been total extermination of Celtic peoples and then blaming Celts for everything that seemed too be wrong with the UK in which they had zero power.

    It was product of WASP propaganda – teaching your poor English masses that all their problems are not due to rich and evil English leaders but to broken, impoverished Celts elsewhere is as devious and horrifying as what the US elites have done in recent decades making us see white Middle America as the source of all problems. Then nobody focuses on the billionaires and the military-industrial complex and the civil rights racket and international Jewry.

    WASPs did not invent Modern propaganda – Jews were masters of using the printing press for pay by evil rulers to propagandize the masses well before jolly ole Catholic England was forced to become the first stage of WASP. But it was the nouveau riche English Protestants who mastered it next, using it against everyone: Catholics, Celts, High Church Anglicans, rural and traditional values Englishmen.

    You know what group WASP propaganda never made the subject of its propaganda to destroy? Jews. That alliance is tight, and it goes back to the 17th century.

  45. @zard

    The best case was that can be made of you is that you are ignorant of both historic Christian doctrines dogmas and the heresies against historic Christian teachings that got us to the horror story.

  46. ariadna says:

    It does not matter very much at all what the characters names are and I’d even go as far as to say the same about what the author’s intended target was in his time and historical environment.
    The description of the society in “1984” provides a Gestalt that applies to any society where a minority installs a brutal tyranny and use diabolical measures to suppress dissent and warp minds.
    An old Soviet era joke described a man arrested after being denounced by one of his neighbors for saying “Stalin is a pig.” The man desperately defended himself telling the interrogator his denouncer misheard, that he in fact had said “Savin (an acquaintance) is a pig,” The interrogator replied,” Com’on, you don’t fool us, we all know who the pig us.”
    So, we all know who the real “Goldstein” is.

  47. Anon[220] • Disclaimer says:

    My experience in life is that people do the same stupid thing over and over and expect a different result. This idiotic tendency is a disease of most people and since most mean the street bum to political figures, they stumble from one mess in time for the other.

    If you know that people of a certain group are the scum of society, why would you want to have anything whatsoever to do with them ? The answer must be that we expect that this time, things will be different and we will not be shafted.

    As for morals, the Joo would sell his Mother to a street gang to acquire a capital stake. In New York I heard a tale of a Jew who wanted to go into business. Lacking the capital to start up he let a fellow traveller service his wife . Both men I was told were obese and smelled to high heavens but there you have it. Business is business I suppose. The venture was a hole in the wall service operation that never progressed beyond a miniscule office with broken down old furniture and a worn out Secretary. I was told, cheap ball point pens were used and old envelopes and other scraps of paper (including hot dog stand tissues) were used to make notes. Mail received with unmarked stamps had the stamps removed and used again. A real classy outfit !

    I once worked for a company that wanted to sell off one of its subsidiaries. A group of Jews turned up to negotiate the purchase. First they seemed a cohesive group but then as negotiations progressed the whole process ground to a halt. The group demanded more and more concessions and each Jew demanded more and more of the pie from his associates. Some interesting experiences were:
    ..they would talk among themselves in Hebrew and then speak English
    ..every verbal agreement on their part seemed “flexible” ie there was always a weasel out
    ..every verbal agreement on our part was however deemed written in stone
    ..changes updated to the legal contract had to be carefully reviewed . What was said sometimes did not make it to pen and paper. Subtle changes sought to tie us up but allowed them to welsh
    ..just when we thought we had a solid contract their attorneys would call with a change
    ..then each Jew would raise hell about the benefit one of his partners would gain over him

    All this,plus having to deal with body odor , beady and shifty eyes and clearly dishonest faces

    It got to the stage where we thought the viable (and profitable) subsidiary was a worthless piece of shit and we should just give it away just to be done with the thing ! The fact was, and the fact was recognized by the Executive team, that dealing with them was like being eaten alive. Breaking off negotiations was another torturous experience with recriminations galore and threats of mayhem and legal action and each one screaming at the others in Hebrew After shopping around for another buyer a non Jewish group purchased the business in an almost casual fashion.

    The lesson to be learnt is to stay away from these people. Dealing with them only leads to one result and any Goy who thinks their outcome will be different is asking to be royally screwed.

    • Agree: Brosi, Druid55
    • Thanks: RedNordid1488
    • Replies: @Hibernian
  48. @Notsofast

    Yeah; I’ve always assumed Goldstein to be sort of preemptive artificial magnet used to entrap dissidents who where attracted to a movement that had never been allowed materialize.

    • Thanks: Sarah
  49. Anon[220] • Disclaimer says:

    We see all sorts of strange combinations these days. Ever seen a man four shades blacker than the Ace of Spades , with a bee hive Afro, with slanty eyes named Fung Kee Fung ?

    Who speaks not a word of Mandarin or Cantonese ? Who talks and jives like a Trinidadian Ghetto Black ? In the Islands they are called Black Chiney !

    Its the old Creole joke. A group of Africans travel to the Caribbean to explore business opportunities. When the plane lands they admonish and berate the pilot for still being in Africa. He and the co-pilot must have taken a wrong turn and ended up in the Congo. Why ? Because the welcoming committee on the tarmac are all dressed in gaudy African robes, skull hats and sandals. Some even have carved tribal sticks. The visiting group are all dressed in tailored English suits with white shirts and ties.

    The Africans deplane and the introductions begin. The African team: John Smith, Peter Duncan, Philip Forde etc

    -The West Indian Welcoming Committee: Mdongo Buglulu, Ngote Achebe, Adomako Mambwe

    Diversity makes us great ! When I meet an Eskimo Jew named Freiherr Karl Otto Von Guttenberg und Kruger Schneider als Muller-Meier, I will know its time for me to flee polite society and live as a hermit in the bush.

    A top of the Morning to all Half Breed freaks with faces that do not match their names. Oh and a free clover leaf and green outfit as well.

  50. Che Guava says:

    This link is to an unofficial translation of much, having read most of it, it seems sincere and not amateurish.

    • Thanks: JimDandy
  51. Jim H says:

    ‘All this, plus having to deal with body odor, beady and shifty eyes and clearly dishonest faces.’ — Anon

    That’s an awfully harsh take on today’s Justice [sic] Department.

    But I like it.

  52. @Pat Hannagan

    Orwell was an English imperialist propagandist driven by hatred.

    I take issue with this description of Orwell. He was a colonial policeman but from reading most of his works it is obvious that he sided with the downtrodden, the oppressed and the victims. He criticised the upper class socialists because of their hypocrisy and lifestyle but obviously agreed with many of the ideas of socialism. He had far more worse to say about the upper class English and their colonial representatives than about any of those others he supposedly “hated”. He was obviously so dissolutioned with being a colonial officer that he preferred to go roughing it down and out in Europe’s cities than living it up in the colonies.

  53. Brosi says:
    @Pat Hannagan

    Interesting article. I am fascinated by this little joke:

    Years later I heard a joke that explained it concisely. An Irishman has been bayoneted by a British soldier, and as the Mick dies slowly in a ditch the Brit kicks him over and over, cursing him and wishing him a painful, slow death. With his last breath the Irishman asks, “Why are you so angry at us?” The Brit leans down, whispers, “You swine, we will NEVER forgive you for what we’ve done to you.”

    I think there is a deeper significance to this. Likely Orwell was a sodomite, like most of the British public school boys and their officer corps. Once buggered as a boy, Brit’s usually become boy buggerers. Just think of the royal family, Churchill and all the long blood lines of multi-generation pedos. This is the real meaning of “we will NEVER forgive you for what we’ve done to you” as each generation of English-Jewish-Venetian-Phoenecian-Frankist inflicts the curse of globo-homo on the next.

    Orwell’s first novel is well known in Burma, and was recommended by our tour guide: Burmese Days

    • Replies: @Druid55
  54. Che Guava says:
    @Commentator Mike

    I recognise about a third to half, it includes fascist sympathisers, Trots, male and female homosexuals, non-communist Labourites, and vaguely left people like Welles. Fewer than half appear to have been Stalinists, Chaplin being an amusing example of that portion.

    It is interesting that Michael Redgrave is on the list, he played O’Brien in one of the old films of the novel, but as ‘O’Connor’, because the surname of the lead actor in that one was ‘O’Brien’. Given that his daughter was or is a rabid Trot, I would think that the chance of his having been a Stalinist, albeit also rabidly queer, pretty high.

    I agree with you on the naming. Orwell was not with an anarcho-syndicalist group in Spain, but with a Trotskyite group.

    Having read the four-volume set of his complete misc. writings and broadcasts, and much correspondence, he remained a socialist of some kind, with a weird idea that would have led to something much like Oceania in the novel, except without what in the real world is the U.S.A.

    The comments to the contrary notwithstanding, he may have been heavily anti-Catholic and anti-Irish, but there isn’t much written evidence for it. None in the collected writings. However, the people he was with in Spain were virulently anti-Catholic, and actions at times of course speak louder than words.

    A couple of the comments on this article on the TOO site are worth reading (more than a couple, but most are covered by comments here).

    • Replies: @Commentator Mike
  55. Durruti says:

    Oppressed Jew Is Watching You
    What Orwell Got Wrong in his Dystopian Satire Nineteen Eighty-Four

    Langdon’s title gets it wrong – even before the first sentence of his essay.

    Orwell’s 1984 was not “Satire.”

    Orwell was quite serious, and meticulous in his portrayal (not of a future society), but of the world we inhabited – then. His 1984, was not a prediction, but History, History with the names changed by Orwell, to make an even greater point. We continue to live in the world Orwell described. We cannot exit Orwell’s sadly totalitarian society, without Fighting, as Orwell did as a soldier in the POUM (Partido Obrero Unida Marxista). As with Durruti, Orwell fought to save the Spanish Republic. He and his comrades did not taste victory; that pleasure remains for us (if we fight).

    In America, who has fought to rescue our Republic, or to Restore it?

    America’s greatest and most popular writer, Ernest Hemingway, was roundly criticized for displaying a Jew (Cohn), as an obnoxious, and suggestively pedophile (certainly – sexually repressed), in his finest Novel, The Sun also Rises.!&&p=e9378336bc19db5fJmltdHM9MTY2ODY0MzIwMCZpZ3VpZD0zZjk0NGRjNC04NjUxLTZmYTAtMmM2MS01ZjliODc3ZDZlZDEmaW5zaWQ9NTI3OA&ptn=3&hsh=3&fclid=3f944dc4-8651-6fa0-2c61-5f9b877d6ed1&psq=the+sun+also+rises+book&u=a1aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZ29vZHJlYWRzLmNvbS9ib29rL3Nob3cvMzg3Ni5UaGVfU3VuX0Fsc29fUmlzZXM&ntb=1

    Hemingway’s path to receiving a Nobel Prize for literature was delayed for more than 20 years.

    • Replies: @Che Guava
  56. Z-man says:

    George Orwell an anti Semite? It’s another badge of honor for him in my book.

  57. Durruti says:

    to me the implication is that goldstein is a front used to round up trouble makers.

    Goldstein was – Lev Bronstein (Trotsky). The remnants of Trotsky‘s political movement was used for that purpose – for decades after his death.


    Earl Browder, Chairman of the American Communist Party, 1930-1945, has a grandson, who is wanted in Russia – for the theft of a $Billion of Russian property.!&&p=fba2bc4926c9c520JmltdHM9MTY2ODY0MzIwMCZpZ3VpZD0zZjk0NGRjNC04NjUxLTZmYTAtMmM2MS01ZjliODc3ZDZlZDEmaW5zaWQ9NTI4Nw&ptn=3&hsh=3&fclid=3f944dc4-8651-6fa0-2c61-5f9b877d6ed1&psq=earl+browder+grandson+wanted+for+theft+&u=a1aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cudmFuaXR5ZmFpci5jb20vbmV3cy8yMDE4LzExL2JpbGwtYnJvd2Rlci13YXItYWdhaW5zdC1wdXRpbg&ntb=1

    Can’t make this stuff up. History appears as farce. Democrats support war, and Republicans are less bloodthirsty? Noooo! Jimmy Dore is smoking too much.

    Americans allow our last constitutional President, John F. Kennedy, and his brother to be assassinated, and do nothing? Noooo!

    Wear that mask. Follow the arrows. Vote when there is no choice. Noooo!

    Assange is in prison, and Snowden in exile? Noooo!

    The coffee is wearing off!

    • Agree: Che Guava
    • Replies: @geokat62
    , @Notsofast
    , @JM
  58. anyone except a Gypsy can join a Synagogue,today,, IF and only IF you pay the membership MONEY!!!

  59. @Franz

    Paine was not an Atheist/Agnostic. He was a Deist. I know this because I read his “Age of Reason” where he demolishes the Bible because of its numerous contradictions but still believes in a God that controls the universe. He believes in the Argument from Design which I believe Ben Franklin also believed in. But I am not as certain about Franklin as I am about Paine.

    • Replies: @Getaclue
    , @anonymous
  60. Z-man says:
    @Haxo Angmark

    Yes, the great Douglas Reed.
    Read his book Far and Wide, 1951 and the essay How Odd of God* which showed the true colors of the Jew in pre WWII Europe.

  61. Durruti says:
    @Commentator Mike

    Here is the list Orwell prepared:

    Orwell‘s list is so large, and politically diverse, that it may have been -parody.

    It is out of character for Orwell to have prepared such a list – to be examined by an Imperialist State.

    This is my reaction/off the cuff view of this ‘list.’ I was not there at the time.

    [Such lists are prepared by all nation’s Police Agencies – who, of course, are Defending our LIBERTY.]

    • Replies: @Commentator Mike
  62. HT says:

    The apple doesn’t fall far from the tree. Garland’s actual family name is Garfinkel and his ancestors were some of the original communists in Russia. Amazing how they try to hide in plain sight by changing their name.

  63. John1955 says:

    There are commentaries on “1984” of which I read quite a few. Many things literally stared in my face and I did not see them 😀

    First line:

    “It was a cold bright day in April, and the clocks were stricking THIRTEEN”

    Food for thought, my friends.

    O’Brien, being a good looking Mick ( or Irish ) was phony Rebel ( Micks were oppressed people and default rebels – hence the choice), his function was to play Judas Goat – to flush out opposition and led MAGA goats to Jan 6 slaughter in room 101.

    Mr. Charrington – high-ranking member of Thought Police – is portrayed perfectly.

    An old-fashioned gent, owner of antique shop, very supportive of Winston and Julia…

    Jewy Mr. Charringtons not only butchered Goyim by the millions in Communist Russia but also ran very elaborate GPU/NKVD/KGB operations abroad.

  64. Charles says:

    Yes, it is all true. O’Brien admits authorship of The Book before Winston is sent to room 101, where Winston is broken. The fuzzy-goateed Goldstein and the ubiquitous Big Brother are both creations of The Party; O’Brien all-but admits as much to Winston, because Winston pointedly asks if BB can ever die, and O’Brien replies that BB is the embodiment of The Party and, of course, the The Party is immortal. I am only confirming that your impressions are correct; I am no authority on Eric Arthur Blair.

  65. BH46 says:

    Why isn’t anyone pointing out the obvious? “1984” is an illustration of contradictions. The names of the pro and antagonist further draw out yet another contradiction. Geez.

    • Agree: Z-man, Curmudgeon
  66. Dutch Boy says:

    To the best of my knowledge, Orwell never stopped considering himself a socialist, although he soured on the Soviet variety of socialism. Orwell’s formulation of liberty (the right to say 2 + 2 =4) is famous. Not so famous is his other criterion for liberty: sexual license. Orwell’s Ingsoc Party created the Anti-Sex league, against which his protagonist Winston Smith rebels. Sexual license was an integral part of modern, leftist revolutionary movements and still is. One of Stalin’s anti-revolutionary sins was to rein in the worst excesses of the sexual revolution in Russia (as preached by Bolsheviks such as Alexandra Kollantai) in the interests of preserving social cohesion in the Soviet Union. Undermining reactionary societies with free love is one thing, undermining the Great Socialist Motherland quite another. Orwell and other leftists have always considered opposition to sexual license as oppressive and reactionary. A good deal of hostility toward the Catholic Church is precisely because of its teachings against non-marital sex. Jews are revolutionaries and the sexual revolution is principally their work. Ironically, this “liberation” has required a good dose of 2 + 2 = 5, as we are compelled to affirm absurdities such as men can become women and vice versa.

  67. The khazarian jews aka zionists are destroyers of nations and humanity, and they will not be satisfied until they have totally destroyed the world as they are satanists and are doing the work of their master satan.

  68. @Che Guava

    Yes, he was POUM while CNT, FAI and the Durruti Column were anarchists but they were loosely allied and all purged by the Stalinists with Orwell narrowly escaping being liquidated by the Stalinist executioners. I think he may have mentioned that he had applied to the International Brigades but British communists conspired to have him rejected. Anyway he said he didn’t care which group he was with as he just wanted to go and kill fascists, but later recognised that those in the opposing fascist trenches weren’t much different, as people, than those in his trenches.

    I recognise some of the names on the list but I meant their political stand at the time he compiled it. People change their views so some Trotskyites or fascists may have had Stalinist leanings at the time, which must have been popular following WWII. He may have had animosity against some of them from the days of the Spanish Civil War if they had sided either with the Stalinists or the Francoists.

    About Catholicism in Homage to Catalonia, Orwell says:

    Obviously the Spanish Church will come back (as the saying goes, night and the Jesuits always return), but there is no doubt that at the outbreak of the revolution it collapsed and was smashed up to an extent that would be unthinkable even for the moribund C of E in like circumstances. To the Spanish people, at any rate in Catalonia and Aragon, the Church was a racket pure and simple. And possibly Christian belief was replaced to some extent by Anarchism, whose influence is widely spread and which undoubtedly has a religious tinge.

    Much is made about anarchist atrocities against the Catholics, but if those priests were anything like the pedophiles in Boston and elsewhere, then they deserve whatever they got. And then the Church as a whole stood by the pedophile priests for so many years and covered up for them. I’m not sure what they were up to in Spain of the day but it couldn’t have been much good if the people risen from their subjugation punished them so severely. Probably some innocent nuns were brutalised by the anarchists but on the other hand some reports of these atrocities may also have been exaggerated in Francoist and right wing propaganda.

    • Replies: @anarchyst
  69. geokat62 says:

    Earl Browder, Chairman of the American Communist Party, 1930-1945, has a grandson, who is wanted in Russia…

    Ah, yes. The “philanthropist,” Bill Browder.

    Here’s a must see interview with Lucy Komisar, a top notch investigative journalist (one of a dying breed) who’s spent years looking into the nefarious activities of Bill Browder.

    The conclusion she’s reached?

    “He’s the world’s most brilliant con man.”

    The Lies of Bill Browder & the Magnitsky Hoax [Lucy Komisar Canadian Pat

    • Thanks: Durruti
    • Replies: @Z-man
  70. Realist says:
    @Gary Sudder

    Why america FAILED by Morris Berman.

    The reason the United States became so rich and powerful in the first place was.

    Two very large oceans protected the east/west borders.

    The population was mostly people who were willing to work their fingers to the bone for minimal wages and never question…sprinkled with a few who were more than happy to take advantage of the situation.

  71. Realist says:

    Did Orwell own a boat?

    Yes, because he could oar well.

    • Thanks: true.enough
  72. @neutral

    I too haven’t read ‘Down and out in Paris & London’ for a decade, but I have a copy
    “Was Orwell an anti-Semite?” and Pfeffer answers that Orwell definitely was. I think Pfeffer is wrong – or rather, I think that he’s accusing Orwell of thoughtcrime for being accurate and honest about reality.
    This is so much like the accusations being leveled against Kanye West , Kyrie and now Dave Chappell.
    I think this is the time that the Whites and the Blacks have to stand together against a more powerful and common foe.
    The Whites should realize that the Blacks are now more WOKE against the Jews than them. Don’t be pussies, walk along with Kanye and Kyrie or encourage them. Know your enemy and attack them.

  73. ‘It’s just a pity that his public novel Nineteen Eighty-Four didn’t bring the same uncomfortable fact before the eyes of millions of his readers.’

    If he had, a lot fewer would have read it. Can you see it being standard high school reading material?

  74. Che Guava says:

    An interesting comment.

    Langdon calling 1984 a satire jarred my bones, too.

    Agree that the depiction of Cohn in the Sun also Rises was very funny, I’m not sure that it’s Hemingway’s best novel, but it’s damned good.

    Peter, the real Durutti was a beast to many (sure, I like some of the music by the ambient music outfit of long ago) and his anarcho-syndicalist ideas (to some extent I agree, as did most of the Italian Fascists) have nothing to do with your own Randian ‘Objectivist’ ideas.

  75. Z-man says:

    That Jew mofo’ is on the BBC all the time as a ‘Russia expert’.
    Man, the Brits are completely owned.

    • Replies: @Trinity
  76. Take a close look at that photo of Garland. Sometimes a single picture can be worth a thousand words. Note that crooked smile. Have a glimpse of that “drip -nose”, where the overhang of the nostrils is atypical of most humans.

    Then check out the eyes. The right one appears to be beneficent and humane. Then quickly check out the left one. Totally different. The Talmudist agenda in all its intensity is highly evident. It’s all about business, baby.

    The business is total world domination for the “Chosen”…even if most of them are fake Jews, no or very little ancient Hebrew DNA.

    Lesson: Carefully study those photographic and video presentations of their visages. Those types can hide a lot with that which comes outta their mouths…Ahh, but those lying eyes…

  77. Orwell was far more subtle in his true viewpoints in his “Animal Farm”. Here the message centers on the Pigs, who overthrew the farmer and took over the whole operation as the new ruling elite. This is a precise depiction if you can read between the lines and consider the Bolsheviks and also the H.G. Welles types who created a very subtle form of control by means of their Fabian Socialist movement.

    As primitive peoples with a Totem Animal, resolutely abjure from eating the flesh of that totem creature, the underlying reference is clear. Which Tribe is it whose texts insist that they not eat pork? Uh-huh!

    Quite obvious if you think about it. At present, the Pigs rule…even if some of their number happen to be quite fond of bacon…it’s that tantalizing aroma.

    • Replies: @Commentator Mike
  78. Getaclue says:
    @Jud Jackson

    Masonic trash is what that is…he was a Mason like nearly all the USA “founders”–at the 33rd Degree level they find out they are really Luciferians worshiping Satan-the club level members are lied to and just think it’s a social thing….

  79. @Commentator Mike

    I think there’s a Russian proverb about how it requires at least three Jews to swindle an Armenian. That’s quite a back-handed compliment.

    • LOL: Zane, Angharad
  80. saggy says: • Website

    And the supreme form of thoughtcrime today is racism.

    Idiocy. The supreme form of thoughtcrime is holocaust denial. And, great as Orwell was, he bought the hoax hook, link, and sinker. Langdon, like most of the faux right, buys in 100%

    • Thanks: Zane
  81. Trinity says:

    Who Watches The Jew?

    Cue: I’m A Girl Watcher by The O’Kaysons

  82. @Notsofast

    Wasn’t Orwell a member of the Fabian Society? Anyone who investigated that organization will come to the conclusion that they are part of the globalists.
    Edit: Nevermind, I confused Orwell with HG.Wells.

  83. @Pat Hannagan

    A good lot of Irish-Americans are currently far more controlled in their thoughts and very lives today than the majority of Irish natives in their homeland. All the monstrosities committed by “Holy Mother Church” are now almost as well understood as the atrocities committed by the Cromwellians and the Elizabethans against the Irish people.

    At its Celtic roots, the civilization of the Irish will find its salvation from the control mechanisms of London and in Rome. Writers like Maeve Binchy are among those who have awakened the people of Eire. Celtic and Druidic ethnological treasures are becoming resurrected and will over time, once more engage the Irish people in the manifold blessings of a closeness to both the Good Earth and to Cosmic realization.

    Perhaps a good listen to “Let it Be” by the Four Angels of the Annunciation of the Age of Aquarius would be a proper message coming from that foursome with its Irish as well as English heritage. St.Patrick’s background was far closer to an Orthodox perspective than to that of Rome. Original Irish Catholicism was something which was smothered in its infancy by Roman priest-craftiness.

  84. @Kinky Friedman

    The (((British Empire))) is 100% a Jewish fabrication, at least since 1688 with the glorious revolution. It’s not a coincidence that Brit means “covenant” in Hebrew and ish means man in Hebrew.

  85. The rancid JEW/ENGLISH Ruling Class of England is using mass legal immigration and mass illegal immigration as demographic weapons to attack and destroy the True English ancestral core of England.

    BARBARA ROCHE — it would more properly be spelled ROACH.

    The pre-Brexit vote UKIP Twitter crowd was highly aware of the malignant JEW named Barbara Roche who colluded with Tony Blair to open the floodgates to nation-wrecking mass legal immigration and mass illegal immigration in 1997.

    England had its fair share of foreigners before 1997, but Blair and Roche and the Labour Party globalizers pushed mass immigration as a means to destroy cultural cohesion in England.

    The evil and treasonous Tories have kept the nation-wrecking mass legal immigration floodgates open and the Tories have done nothing to stop mass illegal immigration.

    The Tories are evil and immoral scum who want to finish the WHITE GENOCIDE attack on the English people first started by Blair and Roche and the treasonous Labour Party.

  86. @emerging majority

    Animal Farm describes in a metaphorical fable how revolutions go astray and come to resemble that what they deposed. Perhaps Trotsky was correct in promoting the concept of permanent revolution to counter this. The idea has nothing to do with the slippery slope of Cultural Marxism but is about continually fighting against corruption and deposing those who become corrupt, betray revolutionary principles for personal gain and work against those they claim to represent.

    • Agree: Durruti
  87. @Durruti

    Thanks. It didn’t cross my mind but maybe you are right, he could have been taking the piss out of the anti-communist hysteria in post-war Britain.

  88. @Kinky Friedman

    Were they truly wasps? Or just marranos larping as whites like they always did?

  89. Very Very Interesting

    Rosenman’s granddaughter Lynn is the wife of current United States Attorney General and former United States Supreme Court Nominee, Merrick Garland.

    It was later learned that Roosevelt had several free hours that afternoon, but was advised by both Stephen Wise (head of the World Jewish Congress) and Samuel Rosenman (the President’s advisor, speech writer and head of the American Jewish Committee) that the protesting rabbis “were not representative” of American Jewry and not the kind of Jews he should meet. Wise also accused the rabbis of “offending the dignity of the Jewish people.”

    Historian Rafael Medoff, founder of The David Wyman Institute (founded by Holocaust historian David Wyman) characterizes Rosenman this way: “One of FDR’s top advisers and speechwriters was Samuel Rosenman, a leading member of the American Jewish Committee. Rosenman, a deeply assimilated Jew, was uncomfortable calling attention to Jewish concerns. After the 1938 Kristallnacht pogroms, he warned FDR that admitting German Jewish refugees to America would “create a Jewish problem in the U.S.” In 1943, when 400 rabbis marched to the White House to plead for a rescue effort, Rosenman counseled Roosevelt to snub “the medieval horde.” Rosenman also tried to undermine the 1943 campaign by rescue advocates and Treasury Department officials for creation of a government agency to save Jewish refugees. The agency, called the War Refugee Board, was eventually established despite his opposition.”

    Remember the Rich Jews like the Rothschilds and Warburgs set up the poorer Jews of Europe and the white goyim of Europe for death and destruction. The Zionist “Jews” wanted the poor Jews of Europe to go the Israel, to have a reason for the establishment of Israel. At the beginning were the camps not extermination camps, but holding camps to protect Jews from all the bombings, so there would be lots of Jews to be sent to Israel?????

    Rosenman cointed the term The New Deal

    Asking the question Will the anti-christ be the Jewish Meshiac – Messiah? Why was it important to set up Israel?

  90. Orwell and Dickens understood the JEW QUESTION.

    I know what happened to Boxer — Russian working class — the work horse in George Orwell’s Animal Farm. Boxer busted his arse building the farm back up to snuff after it had undergone the revolution and other problems. The pigs — Stalinists — rewarded Boxer by carting him away to the glue factory. Poor Boxer finally realized he was going to the glue factory while in the truck, but he was so exhausted from his labors in working on the farm that he didn’t have enough strength to kick the truck to pieces to escape.

    Whites Without College Degrees(WWCDs) are the new Boxer of the present day. The Stalinists are now the Globalizers. The Globalizers have decided that all the hard work and all the soldiering over generations by the WWCDs will be rewarded with deliberate attacks and sneaky ways to harm them. From mass immigration to de-industrialization to hooking the WWCDs on drugs, the Globalizer pigs have used every trick in the book to destroy Whites Without Colllege Degrees. Two academics have described this demographic phenomenon as the WHITE DEATH.

    JEW QUESTION explained:

    Jews form a nation within a nation everywhere they reside. Can Jews ever be considered to be part of the larger nation in which they reside when they are genetically and culturally predisposed to put the interests of the Jew Nation over and above the interests of the larger nations in which they reside?

  91. Jews are definitely calling the shots. They own and control the west and have made it in their image.

  92. US Attorney General Merrick Garland is a JEW from Chicago who is illegally allowing the illegal alien invasion of the United States of America.

    Merrick Garland is a complete and total stooge puppet for the evil and demonic JEW/WASP Ruling Class of the American Empire.

    Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, Merrick Garland and Alejandro Mayorkas are aiding and abetting the illegal alien invasion of the USA.

    Biden, Harris, Garland and Mayorkas must all be immediately arrested for aiding and abetting illegal alien invaders and for illegally giving the illegal alien invaders safe harbor.

    Biden and Harris and Garland and Mayorkas must be arrested and when they are convicted they must be sentenced to lengthy prison sentences and then after their prison terms are served, they must have their citizenship revoked and they must be legally and forcibly deported to walled and fenced concentration compounds in a hot and fetid part of sub-Saharan Africa.

    Biden and Harris and Garland and Mayorkas all push mass legal immigration and mass illegal immigration and REFUGEE OVERLOAD and ASYLUM SEEKER INUNDATION.

    Biden and Harris and Garland and Mayorkas are anti-White and anti-Christian.

    Mass legal immigration and mass illegal immigration increases housing costs, lowers wages, swamps schools, overwhelms hospitals, destroys habitat for wildlife, causes urban and suburban sprawl, creates multicultural mayhem and brings infectious diseases and terrorism to the United States of America.

    • Agree: Zane, Kolya Krassotkin
  93. anarchyst says:
    @Commentator Mike

    Your hatred of Roman Catholicism is showing. Keep in mind that I do not condone any abuse of children by anyone. Those who abuse children must be severely punished.
    That in mind…
    The rate of incidence for sex crimes is about 1 %.
    That is Far less than that of Protestants, J EW Rabbis, Boy Scout troopmasters or certainly Public School administrators. The leader in sex crimes against children is usually inter family related ie Step Fathers, Friends, uncles etc.
    J EWs made a crisis, than brought suit against the centralized Catholic Church and in so doing, forever tarnished the clergy who was their archnemesis.

    Free Republic

    Pedophilia Only a Catholic Sin?
    August 14th, 2009 | Kevin Roeten


    Pedophilia Only a Catholic Sin?

    It turns out pedophilia is an incorrect term, and Catholics aren’t responsible for most of it.

    Shockingly, AP breaks out of their typical liberal mold and reports Insurance companies shed light on extent of sex abuse in Protestant churches, that sexual abuse of minors has been rampant. But in their statement, they indirectly say members of the Catholic Church are not the majority abusers.

    AP discusses the raw numbers from three companies that insure the majority of protestant churches in America (Church Mutual, Guide One, and Brotherhood Mutual), and typically receive 260 reports/yr of people under 18 being sexually abused. Compare that with ~228 credible accusations/yr against Catholic clerics since 1950 (documented abuse records).

    Together with that information, it is known that the Catholic Church greatly outnumbers any specific Protestant denomination, and the data for Protestant churches is available only for the last seven years. Ever since the first sexual abuse cases had been reported, Catholics have had requirements: 1) police background check done on all volunteers,including priests, 2) a second person be present at all religious functions, and 3) all personnel involved with minors must take routine checks with Protecting God’s Children.

    Without a doubt, sexual abuse of a minor is one of the most despicable crimes and sins that man can perpetrate. But predators seem to thrive in an atmosphere where the base congregation is one of the most trusted organizations that exist.

    Philip Jenkins, in his 1996 book Pedophiles and Priests, [[link edited for length]], looked at the problem objectively and dispassionately. Jenkins (who is not Catholic) found that true pedophilia is extremely rare, and perhaps more common among Protestant clergy, and is even more common among married laymen.

    He found that in most sexual abuse cases (under the age of consent), the behavior is actually a variety of homosexuality. This sexual attraction with very young men that combine the charm of boyishness with sexual maturity is actually called ephebophilia. Pedophilia is really a psychiatric term meaning sexual interest in children below the age of puberty.

    The worst sex crimes against children is in the Jewish communities and protestant churches.
    Tomasi was not reserved with criticism either and citing data published by the daily Christian Science Monitor, which was founded a hundred years ago by the Christian Science Church, said that the Catholic Church cleaned its house, Jutarnji List writes.
    According to their figures the majority of the US child abuse cases happens in the Protestant churches and Jewish communities, says Tomasi.


    A Penn State historian, Philip Jenkins, has done an in depth research of pedophilia and sexual abuse among the clergy and has come up with some rather eye opening facts. It seems that while 1.7 percent of Catholic clergy have been guilty of pedophilia (or sexual abuse particularly of boys), a whopping TEN percent of Protestant ministers have been found guilty of pedophilia!

    This is all the more interesting, notes Jenkins, since there has been NO media term Pastor Pedophilia coined at all!

    Jenkins theorizes that the media, proving the point of the necessity of sexual promiscuity, overemphasizes any instance of pedophilia found among the Catholic clergy since it can use this to criticize the entire idea of celibacy. But it is interesting that the NON Celibate Protestant ministers have a MUCH GREATER problem with it than the celibate Catholic priests!

    Protestant pastor pedophilia is not within the frame of our social constructionists as Jenkins calls the media:

    In the 1980s, [Pastor] Leyva had abused perhaps one hundred boys in several Southern states, but few of us ever learned of it. Leyva had the distinction of being a Pentecostal minister and was, therefore, not within the frame of those who were busy constructing reality. The same is true of the three brothers, all Baptist ministers, who were charged with child molestation in the 1990s; the public learned little about this highly unusual series of cases because it was not deemed worthy of dissemination by those fixated on Catholic scandals. [1]

  94. Crass says:

    Tobias Langdon should certainly re-read Nineteen Eighty-Four, as he clearly does not understand it!

    He should start by re-reading the torture sessions inflicted on the Protagonist in the Ministry of Love, by the antagonist, O’Brien.

    “The chief villain is a gentile called O’Brien and the chief heretic is a Jew called Goldstein.”
    Maybe Tobias Langdon also believes that John Kerry (68th United States secretary of state from 2013 to 2017) was also from Irish Stock? Kerry’s paternal grandparents were Austro-Hungarian Jews. This is how the “Name Stealers!’’ operate Tobias Langdon.

    The whole narrative that Emmanuel Goldstein was a traitorous Inner Party member, who was sentenced to death and he ostensibly escaped to form the Brotherhood, was a narrative that was invented by the Inner Party members of Big Brother, including O’Brien. They simply invented a Faux opposition, that did not physically exist in Airstrip One. The Brotherhood was an ideological Controlled Opposition, that was simply used to deceive and entrap Thought Criminals.

    Ingsoc is newspeak abbreviation of English Socialism, which is obviously based on Jewish Communism. All the Inner Party members real names would by more analogous to Stein than O’Brien.

  95. Notsofast says:

    many zioneocons have trotskite roots and actually grew out of the democratic party, then jumping ship to the republican party, before totally co-opting the democrats, through the obama administrations phony “progressive” agenda. the only choice now is red or blue neocon, pick your poison.

  96. Anonymous[386] • Disclaimer says:

    “If Orwell had made Goldstein the villain and O’Brien the heretic, he would have created an uncannily accurate prophecy of twenty-first century America, where Jews wield hugely disproportionate power in a government resolutely committed to harming and demeaning the White majority.”

    If, if, if … he would not have been widely able to publish his ideas because Goldstein & Co. would have blocked it.

  97. Pablo says:

    As the American expression goes, “Let’s call a spade a spade”. There has always been a Deep, Bitter Hatred of non Jews amongst Jewish Radicals. These Jewish Radicals don’t care about Equality; they sure don’t practice it. Jews don’t practice Equality in areas they control, such as the Entertainment Industry or in Banking. They certainly don’t actually care about Human Rights. Jewish treatment of Palestinians attest to that. No, the Jewish Radical is waging Racism. A Racial War on Goyim in general but on White Goyim in particular. The Jew Radical and their Followers of course know better than to accurately and honestly describe themselves. The Jew Radical know their REAL History, which involves Jews being horsewhipped out of every Country they ever lived in.

  98. @anarchyst

    I don’t hate the Catholic or any other churches. I approve of any good they may do and oppose any evil deeds they may get up to. I haven’t studied them all in detail to be able to pass judgement on them in general. Still I think the churches have strayed from the original teachings of Christ by becoming institutions with their administration and bureaucracy, involvement in politics, banking, property ownership, missionary brainwashing of people of other religions, partaking in colonial piracy and plunder, etc. Then there are those ZioChristian churches supporting Israel and looking forward to the Third Temple. But it’s not just the pedophillia, there are many more crimes of the Catholics like during the 30 years war, genocide in Croatia during WWII, etc.

    • Replies: @anarchyst
  99. You have to admit whites are very dangerous to minorities and nonwhite peoples. Jews after their long history suffering under us in Europe, have learned methods of keeping whites in check, which they are sharing with other minority targets of our hostility, such as black people. Affirmative action may be wrong but you cannot blame minorities for teaming together under Jews to keep white ferocity under control. Thanks to them we will never see a black Holocaust, an Asian Holocaust, etc.
    Whites have a right to compete fairly, but you can’t blame minorities for dishing you some of your own medicine. The hypocrisy is insufferable.

    • Replies: @Zane
    , @Kolya Krassotkin
  100. @Kinky Friedman

    “ well before jolly ole Catholic England was forced to become the first stage of WASP. But it was the nouveau riche English Protestants who mastered it next, using it against everyone: Catholics, Celts, High Church Anglicans, rural and traditional values Englishmen.”

    In old Catholic England, you never had to walk more than six miles in any direction to find a Catholic precinct that would give free shelter. When the English aristocracy rebelled against Catholicism, their uprising was never based on ideology, the way it happened in Martin Luther’s Germany, but was the product of greed that sought to confiscate the vast Catholic Church’s properties, which they eventually did. From then on, England morphed into a two tier society were the landed gentry led a parasitical life while the lower masses toiled in a state of total exploitation. ( paraphrasing Dr. E. Michael Jones).

    I would venture and speculate, that rich English aristocrats sought loans from Jews against their ill gotten properties, mortgaging their lands and losing them to usurious Jewish practices. Hence the rise of Jewish power and the decline of the WASP. But the Jewish-WASP alliance would always be United by its rabidly anti Catholic drive and that could explain the visceral hatred that Orwell had to Catholicism.

    • Replies: @JM
  101. Anonymous[386] • Disclaimer says:

    “As things are, it’s honest writers like Orwell, Dickens, and Sailer who are shamed and mocked for telling the truth about minority misbehavior.”

    You must be out of your mind! The two great worthies of the venerable English letters and some unknown jackass in the same sentence.

  102. Trinity says:

    Remember the Jew rabbi that was caught by Chris Hansen on the show, “To Catch A Predator.?”

    Hansen was so cool when he would catch these perverts. Hi, I’m Chris Hanson of……

    Wonder how many politicians Chris could have caught?

  103. anarchyst says:
    @Commentator Mike

    Thank you for your concise response. You are correct. All denominations have “warts” and have done many despicable acts and will continue to do so.
    That being said…
    The last bastion of truth recognizing jews as being a “problem” was the Roman Catholic Church.
    Before the “coup” of the Vatican II Ecumenical Council Catholic doctrine recognized that jews were those to be wary of…not to be mistreated, but to be recognized for their negative societal behavior.
    That all changed when the Roman Catholic Church was “Protestantized” bringing it in line with judaic influence which still exists all throughout Protestantism.
    Is there one Protestant sect that does not put jews and israel on a pedestal?
    Best regards,

    • Replies: @Jim H
  104. Zane says:

    Don’t mention the Hollow Hoax!

    Nix, non, nega, nada, nunca, noooooo….

    The history is settled! Capice?

  105. Zane says:
    @Happy Tapir

    The Holohoax was a myth, buddy. It didn’t happen.

  106. Just to salute the brilliance of Eric Arthur Blair / George Orwell.
    He fought in Spain on the wrong side. The Marxist United Workers Party, POUM, was not his true home in that he professed Anarchy (anarcho-syndicalism). He was lucky not to be executed by Stalinist nun-rapers.
    The same beastiality as the later Red Rapist Army.
    Small part of standard judeo bolshevik inhuman nature/practice.
    Hence Animal Farm. His awakening from naive woolly-minded leftism.

    1984 has many features as commentors note.
    For me the chief one is (1984 is current history in allegory and in reality) language (therefore thought) alteration and rewriting of history.
    It’s basically Bronstein’s Permanent Revolution.
    By the same Tribe and their masonic servitors.
    “Neocons” are trotskyists.
    Goldstein is a non-existent person. A fictitious Jewish saviour. A fable. A deceit.
    Invented for us, the Winston Smiths, to chase after …

    • Agree: spacewanderer
    • Replies: @spacewanderer
  107. Z-man says:

    Jews, especially clever slimy comedians like satanic Bill Maher, make jokes about priests molesting children when the really disproportionate perpetrators are their own kind, Jews. Classic deflection.

  108. @anarchyst

    There used to be a website, which chronicled sexual abuse in the Haredi community, and it sounded as if those lecherous old tzadikim were going to the mikvah as much for defilement as much as for ritual purification.

  109. @Happy Tapir

    Re: Whites are very dangerous to minorities and non-white peoples.

    Bwahaha…Is that why Jews, Asians and the world’s swarthy denizens often risk life and limb to get to white countries?

    And as to insufferable hypocrisy, Solzhenitsyn asserted that The Russian Revolution was a genocide against the Russian people that was spearheaded by a Jewish minority. Yet that assertion can’t even be openly discussed without repercussions, nor is the English edition of his work “Two Hundred Years Together,” in which the assertion was made even allowed to be published.

    • Replies: @Happy Tapir
  110. Durruti says:
    @Commentator Mike

    Animal Farm describes in a metaphorical fable how revolutions go astray and come to resemble that what they deposed. Perhaps Trotsky was correct in promoting the concept of permanent revolution to counter this. The idea has nothing to do with the slippery slope of Cultural Marxism but is about continually fighting against corruption and deposing those who become corrupt, betray revolutionary principles for personal gain and work against those they claim to represent.

    Fantastic Paragraph.

    Trotsky’s Revolution Betrayed should be required reading for Bernie Sanders, and the Gang of 4. You are aware that Orwell’s Novel, “Animal Farm”, is based upon Trotsky’s “Revolution Betrayed?”

    Trotsky died in 1940. As with the Kennedys, M L King, Lumumba, and so many others, Trotsky was assassinated. While in Mexico, he and his wife attempted to be allowed political asylum in the USA. He understood the fate that awaited him.

    I met the man Siquieros, who (many years earlier) led the first attempted assassination of Trotsky in Mexico. I was introduced to Mexico’s great Muralist, Siquieros, after he exited prison (for having led a student action at the U of Mexico). Mexico’s other great artist/Muralist, Diego Rivera, sheltered Trotsky and his wife, in his fortress like home – in Coayacan.

    I had no idea of what Siquieros, a high ranking leader of Mexico’s (Stalinist) Communist Party, had done (before I was born). It is amazing how little we know, when we are teenagers.

  111. @Commentator Mike

    (1. There is no major spokesman or movement today within the left which challenges the war-party and its corporate adherents. Big money in the War-defense industry trumps Trump.

    (2. The most prominent Trotskyites in American politics today are the Straussian Neo-Cons, who glommed onto the Republican Party while the Bu$h Crime Clan was riding high in the saddle and who now have metastasized into running American foreign policy on behalf of their Rottenchild crime clan shotcallers on behalf of the Talmudist agenda.

    (3. An example here in Minnesota. The old Farmer-Labor party included activists from among both the Trotsky and Stalin factions…as well as huge numbers of small farmers and everyday working men. In 1944 Hubert Horatio Humphrey managed to swallow the F-L party into combining with the ever corrupted Democrat party, smoking their cigars and sipping their whiskey over the sewers of St. Paul. The Commies re-infiltrated the DFL, while the Trots moved elsewhere, including into cultural Marxism.

    Thus erupted the Democrat Farmer-Labor party, which over the years has abandoned farmers as no longer a significant demographic and ditto most of those union men which made up its fighting core. Today the Democrat-FORMER-Labor party is an amalgam of the usual minorities, essentially run by the State Central Committee, which takes its orders from a local Kaplan run law-firm as well as the national DNC. Riding side-saddle on that hobby-horse are those suburban soccer-moms and the crowing-hen factions of the feminist movement.

    • Thanks: JWalters
  112. @Kolya Krassotkin

    Nonwhites come to america because it is plentiful in natural resources and to enjoy the vibrant culture which Jews and blacks, and yes, some enlightened whites have created. It’s not to be with whites. That probably only makes them nervous.

    • Replies: @Trinity
    , @Kolya Krassotkin
  113. As I have said many times Merrick reminds me of all of those Russian Jews who ran the Russian Gulags and the East European secret services and the Gulags who according to Sever Plocker the Israeli Journalists killed over 10 million Christians..and do not forget the Ukrainian Jew Lassar Kagonivitz who starved to death millions of Ukies or the Jew propaganda Minister Iyla Ehrenburg…that guy could put Julius Striecher to shame

  114. Trinity says:

    Has been for a long time. English are the Jewiest Whites on the planet. They are the trash of the White race, while the old school Germans before they were raped into submission were the cream of the crop. I say this as a non German or (((Limey.)))

    Biden has to be a crypto English twat.

    • Replies: @Lurker
    , @Joe825
  115. @Durruti

    Your revolutionary Thomas Jefferson said something similar:

    Whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends [life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness] it is the right of the people to alter or abolish it, and to institute new government…

    So if any revolutionary government so betrays its ends it must be deposed, and if the succeeding one does the same then it too must go, and so on – that then becomes “permanent revolution”.

    • Agree: Durruti
  116. Agent76 says:

    July 30, 2022 If You Want to Change the World, You Have to Change Mankind! Enlightenment and Education Scientific psychology as a compass

    When this person then approaches the problem of war, for example, he is able to distinguish: Which people are waging war? Is it only the others, the politicians, the war leaders, or are we ourselves also part of it? For example, the mother who sent her sons to the “field of honour” and then wore a black armband “in proud mourning”?

    “Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past.” George Orwell

    Apr 17, 2020 Orwell’s final warning – Picture of the future

    George Orwell Final Words

  117. @Durruti

    Cuban author Leonardo Padura wrote a novel about the life of the life story of the murderer of Trotsky “The Man Who Loved Dogs” and the assassination (Trotsky loved dogs too, as did his assassin).

    It was extremely well researched and covers the Spanish Civil War, Moscow show trials, training of Comintern agents, post-revolutionary Cuba. I highly recommend it. It reads like a suspenseful spy story but most of the details check out as factual.

    • Thanks: JWalters, Durruti
  118. The current criminal Biden administration is the worst in the nations history. This administration is 86% Jewish in make up and appointment. Why ? Jews are 1% of the population.
    Why is this illegal cabal destroying the nation that more than any other has given this tribe refuge.
    This self destructive behavior seems to be a genetic trait for the Jewish people.

  119. @Arthur MacBride

    For me the chief one is (1984 is current history in allegory and in reality) language (therefore thought) alteration and rewriting of history.

    I think the language alteration is really at the very core of all jewish propaganda out there. It really has a dramatical effect over general public’s thought process. Most people are just incapable of (Aristotelian) dialectic thinking; for these people, there is only rhetoric and rhetoric only. In results, the language corruption and rhetoric control totally dominate the public discourse.

    • Agree: Arthur MacBride
  120. Sen. Hawley blasts Sec. Mayorkas, revealing DHS’s collusion with Big Tech.

    • Replies: @Trinity
  121. Durruti says:
    @emerging majority

    There is no major spokesman or movement today within the left which challenges the war-party and its corporate adherents. Big money in the War-defense industry trumps Trump.

    There are a million stories in the Naked City!

    And amidst the changes in America, no Vanguard Revolutionary movement has been allowed to build a solid political foundation.

    Eugene Debs, America’s finest Socialist was imprisoned for 4 years (for opposing America’s entry into the Imperialist WW I). Six thousand of his Party members were expelled from the US (without trial). His Socialist Party had elected members nationwide, including in Congress. Debs was the President of the several 100,000 member Railway Worker’s Union. These organizations were deprived of leadership, & smashed.

    Campaigning from prison, Debs received 1 million votes – for President – 1920. The repression was organized by Democrat (Wilson appointee), Atty Gen Palmer. Repression was known as the “Palmer Days.”

    After the Civil War-to 2022, the Dems & Reps have been owned & controlled by the Power Elite. Now they are owned by a Foreign Power Elite. They never represented the American people.

    No core of opposition is allowed to form. Decent politicians, representing Core American Oligarchs, and having strong Nationalist Tendencies, have been eliminated. The Coup D’état of 11/22/1963, with the assassination of President J F Kennedy, & later his brother, marked the END of our REPUBLIC!

    All is lost, except HOPE!

    Dr. Peter J. Antonsen – nom de guerre, Durruti

    • Thanks: Zumbuddi
  122. Jim H says:

    ‘Is there one Protestant sect that does not put jews and israel on a pedestal?’ — anarchyst

    This is a fair question. No, I don’t know of any.

    But your thoughtful question deserves to be enlarged in scope:

    Is there any Christian sect — Protestant, Catholic, or Orthodox — that does not canonize a Holy Bible consisting of more than 60% Jewish writings (the Old Testament)?

    If not, what implications should we draw from this? Are they all fatally co-opted?

    • Replies: @Trinity
    , @Zumbuddi
    , @anarchyst
  123. Trinity says:
    @loner feral cat

    When they say Jews are 2% of America’s population ( how long have we heard that horseshit?) Are they just counting “religious” Jews? Do they count all the mutt Jewbros, Turkic mutts, Spic/Shlomo designer breeds like the one you have pictured, etc?

  124. Lurker says:

    Presumably you would advocate for all Muslims to leave the dangerous white nations then?

  125. Trinity says:
    @Jim H

    Are you kidding. Protestants and Catholics have been eating Jew ass forever it seems.

    You even have non religious Whites sucking up to these sand gypsies.

    You ask me ,both Arab and Jew are sand nigras.

  126. Lurker says:

    I thought Biden affected a vaguely Irish identity? While remaining a twat of course.

  127. Zumbuddi says:
    @Jim H

    Intriguing comment on turcopolier recently:

    Although the ‘fake’ prophets are being fallen for – there IS a REAL and GENUINE recalibration of Christianity going on – the FAKers always swarm when there is something REAL afoot… so many honest and grassroots paradigm shifts are hijacked by the FAKers.

    TruNews’ Rick Wiles is among those “FAKers” imo.

    (Based on systematic viewing of TruNews over about a year, if that outlet represents Christianity & its leaders, the lot is dumb as posts, celebrating their ignorance to the detriment of the American people.)

    Wiles’s approach to extirpating “zionism” from is (rapidly metastasizing) cancerous state in the US ostensibly Christian body-religio-politic is to urge church people to “include the works of Josephus Flavius” in their personal libraries. “Not the bible” but a very important source for understanding the bible.?

    It’s important to understand that Wiles, like many church leaders, especially televangelists, is NOT in any way informed on the history of the creeds and -isms they preach about.

    This paper by Flavio Barbiero
    Mithras, Jesus and Josephus Flavius
    identifies Josephus as the original zionist.
    One of the “24 elite Jewish priests”, originally warriors in the rebellion against Rome, upon Jewry’s defeat in 70 AD, Barbario explains that Josephus gathered Temple treasure that he had unique access to and delivered it over to Titus, enabling Titus to finance his ascent in Roman governance. In gratitude, Titus welcomed Josephus & his fellows into his home and government.

    The TruNews team urges its followers to ally with the very strategists who are corrupting their institutions and have been doing so for two millennia.

    Perhaps it’s time to stop criticizing Jews and start demanding that Christianity/Christians wake up and reform themselves.

    • Replies: @emerging majority
    , @Brosi
  128. Joe825 says:

    Biden is as irish as it gets. Germans are idiots. It’s a very young country and they’ll believe anything.

    • LOL: Trinity
    • Replies: @Trinity
  129. Anonymous[374] • Disclaimer says:

    Egalitarianism suggests that, since one person was at one point a king, everyone is a king.

    Yes. Such nonsense must be pointed out. Contradictions should be noted. Hypocrisies must be spotlighted. Like Jews’ tendency to exclude the Tribe from “categorical imperatives” insisting tribal members are “special” and “chosen” and thus “don’t need to heed no steenking laws.”

    For example, every other group must be “proportionally represented.” Jews, however, though just 2% of the US population are “right” to occupy 25% of Harvard and majorities in Hollywood, banking, etc.

    Christianity always was, this is pure nonsense. It does nothing to erase the Reality of hierarchy.

    I read a theory somewhere that Jews created the myth of Jesus to further control goyim. Like it does now (and has forever?) by inverting natural orders.

    For example, by exhorting goyim to turn cheeks instead of kick ass. Instead of exacting an eye for an extracted eye it tells goyim to “bit the bullet.” By stifling righteous wrath, Judaism instills hesitation and doubt in attacked Christians. It’s like a court telling the father of a raped daughter that justice is his pray for the rapists instead of having the offender jailed.

    Feminists do this, too. They call men “angry” as a slur while themselves proudly publishing endless articles about female “rage.” Why? Because they are conditioning men to believer guys have no grievances and are merely “whining.” It works. Instead of uniting and fighting and changing unjust divorce laws, men just futiley grouse while paying huge sums to do-nothing lawyers.

    Similarly, Christians (the majority of Americans) meekly submit to huge interest payments to Jewbanks instead of uniting to change them.

    Any rule of law must be emotionally satisfying as well as intellectually just. Otherwise it’s ignored…like Prohibition was. Because humans aren’t abstract machines.

    Guys do themselves in by mocking “feelings.” Feelings matter. Immensely. Sure, they can be trivialized, just like abstract thought can be misused on trifles and piffles. Yet no person, army, or football team long succeeds without being “inspired.” A coach may inform teams of plays with “chalk-talks.” But in half-time lockerroom gatherings great coaches stir the hearts of players, impassions them to win.

    Ergo, the proper response to whites being demonized is to fight back, defending Caucasian honor and history. And to attack attackers by pointing out the crimes and failures of Jews, blacks, and others so they learn the cost of “hitting below the belt.”

    You don’t respond to accusations of Whites being “unconsciously biased” by acting guilty. You charge blacks with being consciously enstupidated…of choosing to create fatherless families that mooch of White largesse and birth baboons doomed to commit crimes and fill prisons.

    And so on.

    Time for Saxon hate to be manifested. Not violently (unless attacked physically!) but by openly and incessantly calling out Leftist bullshit.


    “It was not part of their blood,
    It came to them very late,
    With long arrears to make good,
    When the Saxon began to hate.

    They were not easily moved,
    They were icy — willing to wait
    Till every count should be proved,
    Ere the Saxon began to hate.

    Their voices were even and low.
    Their eyes were level and straight.
    There was neither sign nor show
    When the Saxon began to hate.

    It was not preached to the crowd.
    It was not taught by the state.
    No man spoke it aloud
    When the Saxon began to hate.

    It was not suddenly bred.
    It will not swiftly abate.
    Through the chilled years ahead,
    When Time shall count from the date
    That the Saxon began to hate.”


  130. anarchyst says:
    @Jim H

    Traditionally, the Roman Catholic Church used the Bible as somewhat of a “guide” but not the “inspired word of God” as is the practice of Protestants.
    The Protestant concept of “sola scriptura” is a major flaw in Protestant theology.
    Protestants still criticize Roman Catholicism for “not taking the Bible seriously”.
    The Bible (both Old and New Testaments) were written, rewritten, translated and retranslated by MEN, all with their own agendas.
    My favorite Biblical concept to bring up is that of “the rights of kings” in which a country’s “subjects” are commanded to obey the dictates of their leaders (kings). I bring up the vile practice of “prima noctus”–a noble having the first “right” (night) with every new bride of his “subjects”. This one example makes my friends think–a good thing.
    That being said, the Old Testament should have been kept separate from the New Testament.
    For the longest time, Roman Catholicism recognized the perfidy of the jews and judaism and kept them at arms length. Protestants adopted many jewish practices readily, something that Roman Catholicism abhorred.
    The Vatican II Ecumenical Council did much to damage Roman Catholicism, Protestantizing the Church and absolving the jews for the crucifixion and death of Jesus Christ.
    Fortunately, there are still Catholic sects that do not subscribe to the changes wrought by Vatican II, a good thing.
    For those who claim that israel must be “protected” and that today’s jews are the “chosen people” I reply that “God is not a real estate agent” and that today’s jews have no right to the middle east and are descended from 6th century Khazars who adopted judaism as a social vehicle and not a religion.

    • Replies: @Commentator Mike
  131. @Trinity

    Can a reader of 1984 even be certain that Emmanuel Goldstein actually exists?
    Couldn’t it be that he was a phantom created by the Ministry of Truth to represent the ultimate evil, and they could project onto him anything that served their purposes at any given moment?

  132. @emerging majority

    Debs, Minnesota is less than a two hour drive from my home. Several years ago I was part of a modest contingent of war-protestors, including a novelist from the area who was wearing his old navy uniform. Our little part of the parade was on the Fourth of July. Did we awaken anyone? Not the ones who get all their national and world information from Boobtoob Noose.

    Wondering too, how many of the other marchers and spectators knew the information you posted on Debs, or that the town was founded by railroad union men who had supported his fight against the fascistic Wilson administration, totally dominated by Talmudists including his chief advisor, Mandel House as well as Bernard Baruch and Felix Frankfurter.

    The blackmailed Thomas Woodrow Wilson also happened to be the man who signed off on the contra-Constitutional Federal Reserve Act and in his re-election campaign in 1916 used for his campaign slogan “I Kept us out of the War”. Within three weeks of his Inauguration Day in March of 1917, he stood before a joint assembly of both houses of Congress and demanded a declaration of War against Germany.

    Debs was a national hero. Wilson was a cowardly, racist hapless villain, the first in a long line of bad presidents which included Herbert Hoover, accelerated with FDR, went into overdrive with Harry Truman, took another jump with “I Like Ike”, was almost derailed by JFK…who was then murdered most foul by the CIA, with the connivance of his successor LBJ…then followed a line of gradually worsening acting presidents, all of whom were shown the Abe Zapruder movie clip, to let them know who was really managing affairs for the Rottenchild Crime Clan and fellow Cabalista Bank$ters.

    • Agree: Joe Levantine, Durruti
  133. Richard B says:
    @Haxo Angmark

    of course, at the end, Orwell took the (((ticket))): because he wanted his late masterpiece to be advertised, distributed, and sold.

    Since Jewish Supremacy Inc.’s control of all major publishing was complete before 1984 came out, it mattered little what Orwell wanted. And in fact it was first published by Secker & Warburg.

    Also, Solzhenitsyn’s circumstances were not that of Orwell’s. So the comparison is invalid.

    Besides, in spite of all of his efforts to stick to the facts, Solzhenitsyn tried to be fair to Jews. Predictably, they did not recognize that fairness, at all. Given what he was writing about concering them, and given that it was so obviously true, why did he even bother?

    Leaving that question aside, earlier in his career Orwell wrote about the power of facing unpleasant facts. And if there’s one unpleasant fact he had the power to face it’s who owned and controlled all publishing, and not just publishing.

  134. @Zumbuddi

    It’s not called the JudieChristie MagickMindfuck for nothing.

  135. Trinity says:

    I think I was referring to Germany before 1945.

    biden doesn’t look Irish to me. He looks more like an ass with bad hair. He is definitely a pussy.

    It took half the friggin world to defeat Germany. Germans couldn’t believe how physically weak the Brits were and compared the Americans to the Italian.

    • Replies: @Joe825
    , @Skeptikal
  136. Thanks TL for helping me connect todays Leftist GlobalHomo, Majik Negroz, Woke Wiggers and Holocaust Survivor hysteria with using thoughtcrime, truthspeak and doublespeak to control their oppressors, mainly, white heterosexual alpha males, you have become my truthsayer.

    Bows and takes a knee.

    It now appears gender cesspools have become so toxic with men pretending to be women in sports, and women pretending to be men in high alpha male roles, all the while grooming kids with drag queen story time, gay porn and gender mutilation fantasy escapades for endless pedo parties to abuse.

    Look mommy, my Winnie is now a vagina like yours.

  137. Brosi says:

    That is a great article about Mithras, Jesus and Josephus Flavius.

    I have been a Trunews listener for a few years, but I ignore all of the dogma of Rick Wiles.

    Joe Atwill has a book about Josephus called Caesers Messaih. I have not read it but I find the concept quite plausible.

    Your article mixes Mithras and secret societies into the brew, and the way in describes the infiltration of Roman patrician society by these crypto-jews closely parallels what happened to England and the US in the 18 and 19th centuries by Jews and thier Kabbalistic Freemasonry.

    As far as we can judge with hindsight, the final objective of the strategy devised by Josephus Flavius was the complete substitution of the ruling class of the Roman Empire with members of Sol Invictus Mithras. This result was achieved in less than two centuries, thanks to the policy enforced by the Mithraic emperors. The backbone of the Roman imperial administration was formed by new families of unknown origins, that had emerged at the end of the first century and the beginning of the second, in antagonism to the senatorial aristocracy, traditionally opposed to the imperial power.

    This describes the takeover of the US by Rothschild, Rockefeller, Roosevelt, Warburg and even Bush families. That these families carry blood lines related to ancient Pharisies from the time of the destruction of the second Temple to Solomon also fits in many ways. One piece of the puzzle I don’t understand here is how the Venetian banking syndicates fit here, or how they tie into the Merovingian dynasty.

    For those of us who are even more conspiracy minded, this could also relate to the Hollywood breeding program and the blood lines that Epstein was working on at his ranch in New Mexico.

    In any case, thanks for providing that URL.

  138. If you want to know who controls you, look at who you are not allowed to criticize

    If Voltaire didn’t say that, I bet he wished he had…
    If Orwell’s hadn’t written two propaganda masterpieces then he would have been finished… Sad dying man with TB.
    Can any one say when “Anti-Semitic” censorship began? When could one actually tell the truth about the Jew and get away with it?

    • Replies: @Richard B
  139. JM says:

    The remnants of Trotsky‘s political movement was used for that purpose (of being “…a front used to round up trouble makers”?) – for decades after his death.

    What evidence do you have of this?

    • Replies: @Durruti
  140. hankjr says:

    if 1984 was published in 1949 and Orwell died in 1950, how do we know the original DIDN’T portray O’brien as the hero and Goldstein as the villain? It’d be easy enough for the publisher to go through the manuscript and switch these two names. who would protest if the author was dead? what if the 1984 everyone knows WAS goywashed postmortem?

  141. @anarchyst

    Martin Luther wrote On the Jews and Their Lies so I don’t think Protestantism is inherently pro-Jewish. In the Orthodox tradition Saint John Chrysostom also condemned the Jews. So the churches sold out. They all live now in the Talmudic world and have adapted to it, or should we say “embraced” it.

    • Replies: @anarchyst
  142. Art says:

    Thanks for the Thomas Paine reference.

  143. Christianity in all its forms, is judaism lite. Its a special form of judaism designed for the goyim, which turns them into a weaponized golem designed to destroy its own race. The prescribed behavior makes the christian/catholic/etc worse than the jew. 1000 years of genocide, and the burning of your ancestral memory, the tolerance of crime, the hatred of family, the race-blindness, and every other conceivable behavior that will get your nationality destroyed, is a part of the teachings of the fictional character jesus.

    Making O’Brien a reference to the evil of Catholicism and more evil than the jew was not a mistake, it was highly apt. The problem is that almost everyone cannot see what he did. The realization of this enormous psychological war is only just barely beginning to occur among the desperate goyim of today.

    It is accurate to address all gentile worshippers of the jewish god, whether its yahweh, christ, or allah, as jews. They are an appendage to the jew; a living embodiment of jewish hatred for their race, and their lives are the most heinous disgrace to their ancestors that is possible to conceive.

    The sole purpose of every goyim of jewish religion is to willingly be part of a mass human sacrifice. The ‘End Times’ and its final battle is the enduring wish of every such worshipper. They want more than anything, to be annihilated from this world in the act of serving their jewish god. This is the desire for self-genocide, and it benefits the jew, whose own prophecy requires the death of the goyim (amalek) as a whole.

    Every non-jew of an abrahamic faith is a race traitor, and a servant of this planets most vile and terrible evil. Their brian washing is so utter and complete, that they are incapable of any form of self-examination or criticism, just like their jewish masters. Their numbers only make it more impossible to reach them.

    This is the hard truth of the fall of the Western world, and nobody wants to admit it.

    • Replies: @emerging majority
  144. Richard B says:
    @Davy Crockit

    Can any one say when “Anti-Semitic” censorship began? When could one actually tell the truth about the Jew and get away with it?

    Great question. I’d say it was between 1937 and 1942 (though, of course, even before that the noose was tightening).

    The justification for those dates being that 1937 was the last year a group of historians could get anything uncompromisingly factual published about FDR’s Foreign Policy as well as Jewish Supremacy Inc.’s role in WWI.
    The book to read on that subject is Perpetual War for Perpetual Peace.

    Then in 1939, Father Coughlin, known as The Radio Priest, had his broadcast pulled from the radio. It had an incredible 30 million listeners when the USA was 120 million mostly white people. Those were the days.
    That same year they also shutdown his magazine, which interestingly enough was titled Social Justice. Given its content, that was probably the only time that phrase actually applied to a real situation in the United States, as opposed to the Orwellian-like fantasy use of it now (another example of their bold inversion of reality).

    Lastly, there’s the great Douglas Reed. And great is the right word. He was considered to be the most respected living journalist at the time and was certainly the highest paid. He had written a book on the rise of Hitler and, not surprisingly, was praised for it.

    Then, applying the exact same approach he used to write his book on Hitler to what was going on behind the scenes just before and for some time after the start of WWII, he was told that not only could they no longer accept his reports, but that if he continued to file them there would be consequences. The year he gives for the last report filed was 1942.

    He then retired from journalism, went into seclusion, and wrote his masterpiece
    The Controversy of Zion, finsihed in 1956, but not published until 1978.

    That book deserves to be not merely read, but studied. In a fair world a journalist major would be able to do their thesis on him. The fact that that would never happen today is proof that White Supremacy is a laughable lie and that Jewish Supremacy is the only real supremacy in the world today, and possibly ever.

    In any event, Reed was a true power of example. He had courage, honesty and intelligence. In short, he was a great man.

    One could argue, as some here have, that TUR is a honey pot site used to gather data on undesirables, but I’m still grateful to Ron Unz for making Reed’s book available here, and not just Reed’s book, but the whole TUR Library. Between that library, the work of some of the contributers, and the lively comment section (where some of the comments match and even surpass the work of the contributers), TUR is without a doubt the greatest website in the history of the Internet.

    • Agree: Happy Tapir
  145. Richard B says:
    @Richard B

    For those interested, here’s the link to Douglas Reed’s book mentioned in my previous comment.

    • Replies: @Happy Tapir
  146. Joe825 says:

    Yeah, they’re fantastic when it comes to doing surprisingly well after picking stupid, unwinnable fights. They’re tactically brilliant and strategically retarded. They’re busy replacing themselves with 3rd worlders so I don’t think we’ll have to worry about them much longer. The idiots made themselves dependent on Russia too. Yet another strategic blunder idiotic beyond words. They’re so inept I almost feel bad making fun of them.

    • Agree: RedNordid1488
    • Replies: @Trinity
  147. Skeptikal says:

    “Germans couldn’t believe how physically weak the Brits were and compared the Americans to the Italian. ”

    It is quite well established that under the Second German Reich, public health was significantly improved in Germany, esp. German cities. Many observers in WW1 noticed that the British troops were pathetic physical specimens compared to the Germans.

    For instance, schoolchildren in Berlin all had to wash with soap and water at the school, before school began, plus got decent lunches. Workers who came to work on the construction of the Kiel Canal were, similarly, provided with clean living areas, opportunities to wash, and decent meals. Also, breaks.

    At the time this was revolutionary.

    The regular folks of Britain had been degraded and run down for centuries by both the hierarchical agriculture system, enclosure of the commons, early industrialization, and other factors. The disastrous condition of the teeth of the English is proverbial.

    • Thanks: Z-man
  148. geokat62 says:
    @Richard B

    That book deserves to be not merely read, but studied.

    I concur. For those who may not have the time to read this masterpiece, I’ve compiled below a collection of what I thought were the most pertinent quotes.



    The true start of this affair occurred on a day in 458 BC which this narrative will reach in its sixth chapter. On that day the petty Palestinian tribe of Judah (earlier disowned by the Israelites) produced a racial creed, the disruptive effect of which on subsequent human affairs may have exceeded that of explosives or epidemics. This was the day on which the theory of the master-race was set up as “”the Law”.

    Their name, Habiru, denoted no racial or tribal identity; it meant “nomads”. ..

    The Jacobin leaders directed the Reign of Terror and, as good Illuminates, used classic pseudonyms in the manner initiated by “Spartacus” Weishaupt himself: Chaumette was Anaxagoras, Clootz (described as a Prussian baron) was Anarcharsis, Danton Horace, Lacroix Pllblicola and Ronsin Scaevola…

    when politicians shun the truth as the devil might shun holy water…

    In matters of fact he was always right; in those of opinion, he was ever on the side of the angels…

    This was the process by means of which, as Disraeli said in Lothair (1870) “democracy has degraded statesmen into politicians”…

    The German Jew then was wont to refer to “diese Ostjuden” (these Eastern Jews!) with aversion; the Eastern Jew for his part, when after the first world war he made his way from Russia and Poland into Germany, spoke with contempt of the settled Jews there as “diese Berliner” (these Berliners!).

    the Levitical scriptures…

    The Jews spoke similarly: one told him, “The land of our forefathers is dead, and Palestine is its grave . . . to attempt to form a nation from the polyglot people of Judaism today would only end in utter failure”…

    Mr. Lloyd George’s later ones, “Acetone converted me to Zionism”

    In particular, this applies (in Weishaupt’s papers and the Protocols alike) to the knowledge of human weaknesses, which are singled out with analytical exactitude, the method of exploiting each of them being described with disdainful glee…

    Dr. Weizmann chose Manchester for his residence. He says “by chance”, but credulity balks…

    In 1900 Americans still clung to their “American dream”, and the essence of it was to avoid ….foreign entanglements”…

    Such notions, in a Texan of the late 19th Century, are as unexpected as Buddhism in an Eskimo…

    “If The Times does not return to its independent line and act as watchdog of the public I shall wash my hands of it”…

    No precedent existed for the donation of Arabian territory, by a European conqueror, to an Asiatic beneficiary…

    “The diplomat’s word” and his “deed” were different…

    it is like playing billiards with twisted cues and elliptical balls…

    the Talmudic fingerprint mockingly left in the death-chamber of the Romanoffs…

    The politicians of the West became professional dissimulators…

    During the Second World War the Soviet dictator Stalin, being urged by the Western leaders to take account of the influence of the Pope, asked brusquely, “How many divisions has the Pope?”. Such at least was the anecdote, much retold in clubs and pubs, and to simple folk it seemed to express essential truth in a few words. Dr. Weizmann’s case shows how essentially untrue it was. He had not a single soldier, but he and the international he represented were able to obtain capitulations never before won save by conquering armies…

    [Dr. Weizmann] wrote to Lady Crewe, “We hate equally anti-semites and philo-semites”.


    … for thou art an holy people unto the Lord thy God; the Lord thy God hath chosen thee to be a special people unto himself above all people that are on the face of the earth . . . Thou shalt be blessed above all people . . .

    By giving material ambition the largest shape it can have on earth, they identified themselves forever with the baser of the two forces which eternally contend for the soul of man: that downward pull of the fleshly instincts which wars with the uplifting impulse of the spirit…

    “A unifying idea underlay it all”, says Dr. Kastein, and this unifying idea was tribal nationalism, in a more fanatical form than the world has otherwise known. The Torah was not revealed religion but, as Mr. Montefiore remarked, “”revealed legislation”, enacted to an end…

    With this glimpse of a loving God of all mankind the protests ended. The Levites and their Law were left paramount and there with the true captivity of ”’the Jews” began, for their enslavement to the law of racial and religious hatred is the only geniune captivity they have suffered…

    These are the characters. Then comes the denouement, a Jehovan vengeance on “”the heathen” and a Jewish triumph in the form of a symbolic “restoration’ -. ….King Belshazzar”. when Daniel has foretold his doom, is killed “in the same night’ – and his kingdom falls to the enemy. The Jewish captors who killed the Russian Czar and his family, at the end of the First Twentieth Century war, quoted this precedent in a couplet “written on the wall” of the room where the massacre occurred; the Nazi leaders, at the end of the Second Twentieth Century war, were hanged on the Jewish Day of Atonement…

    Thus the two World Wars of this century have conformed, in their outcomes, to the pattern of the Babylonian-Persian war of antiquity as depicted in the Old Testament…

    The sect had yet to complete the Law and then to apply it to its own people. When that happened in 458 BC, under another Persian king, the controversy of Zion at last took the shape in which it still implacably confronts its own people and the rest of mankind. The umbilical cord between the Judahites and other men was then finally severed…

    “Strangers” are usually puzzled to imagine any means by which the ruling sect could keep so firm a hold over a community scattered about the world. This power is based, ultimately, on terror and fear. Its mysteries are kept hidden from the stranger, but by diligent study he may gain some idea of them.

    The weapon of excommunication is a dreaded one, and the fear which it inspires rests to some extent on the literal Judaists belief in the physical efficacy of the curses enumerated in Deuteronomy and other books; the Jewish Encyclopedia testifies to this continuing belief. In this matter there is a strong resemblance to the African Native’s belief that he will die if he is “‘tagati’d”, and to the American Negro’s fear of voodooist spells. Casting out of the fold is a much-feared penalty (and in the past was often a lethal one), of which examples may be found in the literature of our day…

    During that period the Levites in Babylon completed the Law, the impact of which all nations have felt ever since. Ezekiel of the High Priest’s family was its chief architect and probably all five books of the Law, as they have come down, bear his mark. He was the founding-father of intolerance, of racialism and vengeance as a religion, and of murder in the name of God…

    Then, in 458 BC, the Levites struck.
    Their Law was ready, which was not by itself of much importance. The Persian King was ready to enforce it for them, and that was of the greatest importance, then and up to the present moment. For the first thing the ruling sect accomplished the wonder which they have since repeatedly achieved: by some means they induced a foreign ruler, who was their ostensible master and to all outer appearances a mighty potentate in his own right, to put his soldiers and money at their disposal.
    On this day in 458 BC the Judahites in Jerusalem were finally cut off from mankind and enslaved in a way they never knew in Babylon. This was the true “”start of the affair”. The story is told in the books of Ezra and Nehemiah, the Levitical emissaries from Babylon who were sent to Jerusalem to enforce Ezekiel’s law…

    Ezra brought the new racial Law with him. He enforced it first among his own travelling companions, allowing only those to accompany him who could prove that they were Judahites by descent, or Levites. When he reached Jerusalem he was filled with horror and dismay” (Dr. Kastein) by the prevalence of mixed marriages. The Judahites were finding happiness in their fashion “by tolerating miscegenation with neighbouring tribes they had established peaceful relations based on family ties.”

    Dr. Kastein says that ”’Ezra’s measure was undoubtedly reactionary: it raised to the dignity of a law an enactment which at that time was not included in the Torah (which the Levites, in Babylon, were still writing down). Dr. Kastein’s use of the word “dignity” is of interest in this connection; his book was published in Berlin, in the year, twenty-four centuries later, when Hitler enacted exactly the same kind of law; it was then called “infamous” by the Zionists, and the armies of the West, reversing the role of the Persian soldiers of 458 BC, were mobilized to destroy it!…

    What had happened was that the earlier, Israelite tradition had been expunged or cancelled, and in its place the Judaic racial law had assumed ”’final and conclusive form”…

    The subject motter, then, was the important thing, not historical truth, or “philological exactitude”, or the word of God. The subject matter was political nationalism in the most extreme form ever known to man, and conformity with this dogma was the only rule that had to be observed. The way in which these books were compiled, after Judah was cast off by Israel and the reasons, are clear to any who study their origin…

    He was being enticed to declare himself openly: to say that “the heathen” were also “neighbours,” and thus to convict himself of transgressing The Law. In fact he replied in this sense, but in such a way that the interrogator was undone. Seldom was a lawyer so confounded.

    The Levitical-Pharisaic teaching was that only Judeans were “neighbours,” and of all the outcast heathen they especially abominated the Samaritans (for reasons earlier indicated). The mere touch of a Sarnaritan was defilement and a major transgression (this continues true to the present day)…

    uJe~l’ish I~je ~vas regulated by the leaching,\,’ qfthe Pharisees: the It’hole history (~lJudaism ~vas reconstructedfronl the Pharisaic ]Joint of’vieli’ . .. Pharisaisln shaped the character of’Judaisln and the life and the thought q{ the Jell’ fe);- all the ./llture … It lnakes (separatisrn’ its chie./’ ehar{leleristie”…

    The story of Zion, from its start, falls into five distinct phases: those of the Levites, the Pharisees, the Talmudists, the “emancipation” interlude and the Zionists…

    Nevertheless, in the case of the Jews there was an obvious paradox which repeatedly baffled and alarmed the peoples among whom they dwelt. The Jewish Law expressed the theory of the master-race in the most arrogant and vindictive [or inconceivable to the human imagination; how then could the Jews attack nationhood in others? Why did the Jews demand the levelling of barriers between men when they built an ever stronger barrier between the Jews and other men? How could people, who claimed that God had made the very world itself for them to rule, and forbade them to mix with lesser breeds, complain of discrimination?…

    It was true that the Jewish clamour for emancipation was not truly concerned with the great idea or principle at issue: human liberty. The Judaic law denied that idea and principle. The Talmudic governors of Jewry saw that the quickest way to remove the barriers between themselves and power over nations was to destroy legitimate government in these nations; and the quickest way to that end was to cry “emancipation!”.
    Thus the door opened by emancipation could he used to introduce the permanent revolutionary force into the life of nations: with the destruction of all legitimate government, the revolutionaries would succeed to power, and these revolutionaries would be Talmud-trained and Talmud-controlled. They would act always under the Mosaic Law, and in this way the end of Babylon could be reproduced in the West…

    Apart from that permanent reason for revision, the new factor, Christianity, had arisen and the Law’s application to it had to be defined. Thus the Torah (the Law) began to receive its huge supplement, the Talmud, which was of equai or greater authority…

    The core of dogma remained as Ezekiel, Ezra and Nehemiah had shaped and enforced it; but the Talmud, in effect had taken the place of the Torah, as the Torah earlier had supplanted the “oral traditions.”…

    The Jews who entered Spain with the Moors came from North Africa and when they left most of them returned thither or went to Egypt, Palestine, Italy, the Greek islands and Turkey…

    An example of the different language which the Torah spoke, for Jews and for Gentiles, has previously been given: the obscure and apparently harmless allusion to “‘a foolish nation” (Deuteronomy, 32.21). According to the article on Discrimination against Gentiles in the Jewish Encyclopaedia the allusion in the original Hebrew is to “”vile and vicious Gentiles”, so that Jew and Gentile received very different meanings from the same passage in the original and in the translation. The Talmud, however, which was to reach only Jewish eyes, removed any doubt that might have been caused in Jewish minds by perusal of the milder translation~it specifically related the passage in Deuteronomy to one in Ezekiel, 23.20, and by so doing defined Gentiles as those “whose flesh is as the flesh of asses and whose issue is like the issue of horses”! In this spirit was the “interpretation” of the Law continued by the Tahnudists…

    the Jew who sells to a Gentile landed property bordering on the land of another Jew is to be excommunicated. A Gentile cannot be trusted as witness in a criminal or civil suit because he could not be depended on to keep his word like a Jew. A Jew testifying in a petty Gentile court as a slngte witness against a Jew must be excommunicated. Adultery committed with a non-Jewish woman is not adultery “for the heathen have no lawfully wedded wife, they are not really their wives”. The gentiles are as such precluded from admission to a future world…

    In 1898, at the Second \Vorld Zionist Congress at Basel, a Zionist from Russia, Dr. Mandelstamm of Kieff, declared~ “The Jews energetically reject the idea of fusion with other nationalities and cling firmly to their historical hope, i.e., of world empire”…

    The Zionists have gained political control over gentile governments and the Jewish masses alike, so that what the individual remonstrant says is of little weight. The Zionists have restored the Levitical Law, in its Pharisaic and Talmudic interpretations, in full force. Their actions towards others in the past have been and in the future will be guided by that, and not by what “the attitude of Modern Judaism” was in 1916…

    This act of Gentile submission to the ruling sect recurs through all hIstory, from the time of Babylon to the present day…

    What was actually permitted in the synagogues and schools was a unique form of dialectics, designed still further to strengthen the edifice of The Law. ‘The disputants were merely allowed to prove that anything was legal under the Talmud; one debater would state a proposition and another the contrary, each demonstrating that The Law allowed it!
    This practice (the brothers Thoreau give glinlpses of it in their books) was called “pilpulism”. It gives the key to a mystery which often baffles Gentiles: the agility with which Zionists are often able to justify, in themselves, precisely what they reproach in others. A polemist trained in pilpulism would have no difficulty in showing the Judaic law ordaining the enslavement of household Gentiles to be righteous and the Roman ban on the enslavement of Christians by Jewish masters to be “”persecution”; the Judaic ban on intermarriage to be “voluntary separation ” and any Gentile counter-ban to be “discrimination based in prejudice” (Dr. Kastein’s terms); a massacre of Arabs to be rightful under The Law and a massacre of Jews to be wrongful under any law…

    The study of hundreds of volumes, during many years, gradually brought realization that the essential truth of the story of Zion is all summed-up in Mr. Maurice Samuel’s twenty-one words: ~”We Jews, the destroyers, will remain the destroyer forever … nothing that the Gentiles will do will meet our needs and demands” …

    Out of the experience of 458-444 BC, when the Levites with Persian help clamped down their law on a weeping people, the nation was born which ever since has performed its catalytic function of changing surrounding societies while remaining itself unchanged…

    If neither king Ahasuerus nor “Mordecai sitting in the king’s gate” truly lived in 550 BC nevertheless Mordecai in our century is real and powerful and two generations of public men have adlninistered their offices from fear of him more than from care of their peoples’ interest.
    It is our today which makes this remote, unplausible yesterday so plausible.
    On the face of it. Belshazzar and Daniel, Ahasuerus and Mordecai seem to be symbolic figures, created for the purpose of the Levitical political programme, not men who once lived. But . . . the massacre of the Czar and his family, in our century, was carried out according to verse 30, chapter 5 of Daniel; the hanging of the Nazi leaders followed the precept laid down in verses 6 and 10, chapter 7, and verses 13 and 14, chapter 9, of Esther…

    Dr. Kastein, the sect’s devotee, says of Greece and its civilization merely that “it was intellectually brilliant … but the prototype of everything that was mendacious, cruel, slanderous, cunning, indolent, vain corruptible, grasping and unjust”. He dismisses the episode of Greece with the triumphant note, “The Alexandrian Jews brought about the disintegration of Hellenic civilization”…

    In our century conflicts between nations, on the Babylonian­ Persian model, even though they seemed at their start to be concerned with issues remote from any Jewish question, were turned into Judaic triumphs and Judaic vengeances, so that the destruction which accompanied them became an act of fulfilment under The Judaic Law, like the slaying of the Egyptian firstborn, the destruction of Babylon, and Mordecai’s pogrom…

    Greece and Rome, in the Common Gentile view, created enduring values on which the civilization of Europe was built. Out of Greece came beauty and Greek foundations lie beneath all poetry and art out of Rome came law and Roman ones lie beneath Magna Carta, Habeas Corpus and the right of a man to fair and public trial, which was the greatest achievement of The West.

    To the Zionist scholar Greece and Rome were just transient heathen manifestations, equally repellent. Dr. Kastein says disdainfully that in Rome “from the very beginning Judea quite rightly saw rnerely the representative of unintellectual and stupid brute force”…

    The 450 years have seen three of these “‘revolutions” (counting only the chief ones). Each was more destructive than the last. Each was recognizable as the heir of the former one by its chief characteristics, and these, again, were the chief characteristics of the Judaic Law as laid down in the Torah-Talmud. The main assault in each case was on legitimate government, nationhood and Christianity. Under the Judaic Law the only legitimate government is that ofJehovah and the only legitimate nation is that of Jehovah’s chosen people, under the Talmudic supplelnent of that Law Christianity is specifically the chief of those “”other gods”, after whom the chosen are forbidden to “”go a-whoring”; and “”destruction”, as has been shown, is a supreme tenet of that Law.
    When these revolutions began they were supposed to be aimed at “‘kings and priests”, as the symbolic figures of oppression. Now that the power of kings and priests is gone, but the revolution is established in permanence, it may be seen that these were false words, chosen to delude “”the multitude”. The attack was on nationhood (the rnurdered king being in each case the symbol) and on religion (the destruction of churches being the symbolic act)…

    Talmudic incitement and control of the English and French revolutions cannot be discovered, at any rate by the present writer’s research. In each case the results bore the familiar signs of the Judaic triumph (the “return” of the Jews to England, the emancipation of the Jews in France), although at the start of both revolutions the Jewish question had not been present in the public mind as an issue at stake. As far as the student can ascertain at this distance of time, the projection of “the Jewish question” into these issues, and its elevation to a chief place among them, was sonlething achieved while the revolutions went along, and the Judaic elders who accomplished this did not actually bring about the revolutions.
    The third case, that of the Russian revolution, is entirely different. It culminated in the greatest Judaic triumph and Judaic vengeance on record, either in Old Testamentary history or in later history, and was organized, directed and controlled by Jews who had grown up in the Talmud-controlled areas. This is a fact of our present day, demonstrable and undeniable, and it is the most significant fact in the whole story of Zion, illuminating all the past and giving the key to all the future.
    For our century, which produced that event has also seen the word ”’revolution” given a new meaning, or more accurately, given its true meaning: destruction without end until The Law is fulfilled…

    What was airned at was plainly the final consummation of The Law, in its literal form: “Thou shalt reign over every nation but they shall not reign over thee … the Lord thy God shall set thee on high above all nations of the earth”.
    Without this motive the three revolutions would never have taken the course they took, the course they took prefigures the shape of the future. They represent stages in and steps towards the fulfillment ofThe Law, and, once again, those who in their day seemed to be great or powerful men in their own right, like King Cyrus and the mysterious King Ahasuerus, now look like mere puppets in the great drama of Judaic history as it moves towards its miraculous end in Jerusalem…

    What is certain is that the French revolution, while it was brewing, was supposed to be for “the rights of man” (which presumably meant all men, equally), but when it began “the Jewish question”, as by magic, at once came to the fore. One of the earliest acts of the revolution (1791) was the complete emancipation of the Jews (just as the law against “anti-semitism” was one of the first acts of the revolution in Russia)…

    The story of the Jews, under this control, was the same in Babylon, Persia, Egypt, (Greece, Rome and Spain, and could not be anything else, given the unique Judaic Law…

    In Napoleonic manner he took it by the throat and tried to extract an answer from it to the eternal question: did the Jews truly desire to become part of the nation and to live by its law, or did they secretly acknowledge another law which commanded them to destroy and dominate the peoples among whom they dwelt?…

    The strange world in which Napoleon thus set foot is little understood by Gentiles. It is illumined by the following two quotations:
    “”Owing to the acceptance of the idea of the Chosen People and of salvation, the Jewish world was Judeocentric, and the Jews could interpret everything that happened only from the standpoint of themselves as the centre” (Dr. Kastein).
    “The Jew constructed a whole history of the world of which he made hilnself the centre, and from this moment, that is, the moment when Jehovah makes the covenant with Abraham, the fate of Israel forms the history of the world, indeed, the history of the whole cosmos, the one thing about which the Creator of the world troubles himself. It is as if the circles always become narrower; at last only the central point remains: the Ego” (Mr. Houston Stewart Chalmberlain)…

    [Napoleon] knew that, according to the Judaic Law, the world had been created, at a date precisely determined, solely for the Jews and everything that happened in it (including such an episode as that of his own fame and power) was calculated simply to bring about the Jewish triumph…

    Napoleon’s questions went, like arrows to a target, straight to the tenets of the Torah-Talmud on which the wall between the Jews and other men had been built. The chief ones were, did the Jewish Law permit mixed marriages, did the Jews regard Frenchmen as “strangers” (foreigners) or as brothers, did they regard France as their native country, the laws of which they were bound to obey; did the Judaic Law draw any distinction between Jewish and Christian debtors?…

    The Sanhedrin acknowledged the extinction of the Jewish nation to be an accomplished fact. This solved the central dilemma thrown up by the fact that the Law, which theretofore had always been held to be exclusively binding for Jews, allowed no distinction between religious and civil law. As “the nation” had ceased to exist, the Talmudic laws of daily Iife were proclaimed to be no longer be effective, but the Torah, as the law of faith, remained immutable, thus said the Sanhedrists. If any clash or dispute were to occur, the religious laws were to be held subordinate to those of the state in which individual Jews lived. Israel thenceforward would exist only as a religion, and no longer looked forward to any national rehabilitation.
    It was a unique triumph for Napoleon (and who knows how much it may have contributed to his downfall?). The Jew’s were liberated from the Talmud; the way to their re-integration in their fellow men, their involvement in mankind, was reopened where the Levites had closed it over two thousand years before; the spirit of discrimination and hatred was renounced and exorcised. These declarations formed the basis on which the claim for full civil liberties was made and realized throughout the West in the years that followed…

    Thenceforth Orthodox Judaism, “with the face it turned toward the West, denied any suggestion that the Jews would form a nation within nations. Reform Judaism in time eliminated every prayer expressing so much as even the suspicion of a hope or a desire for any form of Jewish national resurrection” (Rabbi Moses P. Jacobson). The ground was cut from beneath those opponents of Jewish emancipation in the British Parliament who contended that “the Jews look forward to the coming of a great deliverer, to their return to Palestine, to the rebuilding of their temple, to the revival of their ancient worship, and therefore, they will always consider England not as their country. but merely as their place of exile” (quoted by Mr. Bernard J. Brown).
    Yet these warning voices spoke the truth. In less than ninety years the declarations of the Napoleonic Sanhedrin had in effect been cancelled…

    It was an illusion. In the eyes of today’s Gentile student it seems to have been a great opportunity missed. In the eyes of the literal Jew it was an appalling danger narrowly averted: that of common involvement in mankind…

    The one movement Zionism, aimed at reassembling a dispersed nation in a territory promised to it by the Jewish god,’ the second movement, Communism, aimed at the destruction of separate nationhood as such.
    Thus these two movements appeared at first sight to be fixedly opposed to each other- for the one made nationalism its religion, even its god, and the other declared war to the death on nationalism. This antagonism was only apparent, and in truth the two movements ran on parallel tracks, not head on towards a collision on the same line, “for the god who promised land to the nation to be gathered-in also promised to set it “above all people that are upon the face of the earth” and to destroy all other nations ··with a mighty destruction until they be destroyed”. The world-revolution, which pursued the second of these aims, thus fulfilled the condition set for the first of them; either by accident or by design, it too was doing the will of Jehovah…

    that fantastic feat of international stage-management on the grand scale in October 1917 when Communism (the destroyer of nationhood) and Zionism (the creator of the dominant nation) triumphed at the same instant!

    “”Our governments”, in the half-century that has elapsed, have become such “willing slaves” of the Judaic master-sect that they are in fact the bailiffs or agents of a new, international ruling-class, and not true governors at all…

    The West has come to this dilemma through the pressure of two rnillstones, Communism and Zionism, the nation-destroying world-revolution and the new, nation-creating, ruling-class. The one has incited the mob, the other has gained mastery over rulers. Are the organizers of both the same? This book seeks to answer the question in its rernaining chapters. What is clear is that each stage in the ruination of the West, during these 170 years, has been accompanied by successive stages of “the return” to the promised land. That is an indication of common managership too strong to be set aside unless it can be conclusively disproved. To the ”’heathen” masses of Christendom the process which began with the emergence of the world-revolution in 1789 has been merely one of sound and fury, signifying nothing; but the student perceives that in majestic rhythm it fulfils The Law and The Prophets of Judah…

    The French revolution of 1789 is the one that provides the key to the mystery. It forms the link between the English one of 1640 and the Russian one of 1917 and reveals the whole process as a planned and continuing one which, having passed through these three stages, clearly will reach its final orgasm at some moment not far distant, probably during this century. That climax, foreseeably, will take the shape of an attempt to consummate and complete the world­ revolution by setting up a world-government under the control of the organization which has guided the revolutionary process from its start. This would establish the sway of a new ruling-class over the submerged nations. (As Dr. Kastein would say, it would “deterlnine the fate of the whole world”)…

    Then, after the outbreaks of 1848, Disraeli returned to the subject, telling the House of Commons in 1852: “The influence of the Jews may be traced in the last outbreak of the destructive principle in Europe. An insurrection takes place against tradition and aristocracy, against religion and property … The natural equality of men and the abrogation of property are proclaimed by the secret societies who form provisional governments and men of Jewish race are found at the head of every one of them” (exactly the same thing recurred in Russia, in 1917, that is, seventy years after the 1848 outbreaks). Disraeli added, “The most skilful manipulators of property ally themselves with Communists; the peculiar and chosen people touch the hands of all the scum and low castes of Europe”. This, he said, was because they wished to destroy Christianity…

    The whole dispute between ancient Israel and Judah of the Levites raged round this false deity [Moloch] and his demands, and Israel turned its back on Judah on this very account; this is the root of the controversy of Zion, three thousand years ago and now…

    The god of love and mercy, the god of hatred, vengeance and human sacrifice: that was from the start the issue, and is today, and if Disraeli had lived a hundred years later Christendom might by this scion of Jewry have been spared the stigma of the Talmudic vengeance at Nuremberg. Similarly, Disraeli cannot be imagined lending himself, his office and his country’s strength to the support and spread of the world-revolution, as the leaders of Britain and America lent themselves in the fIrst and second world wars; his whole public life was spent in forewarning his country against the destructive conspiracy which their acts promoted…

    The present writer thinks he erred in one matter, namely, in his opinion that the doctrines of Jesus were the completion, not the repudiation, of Judaism. The contrary seems to me to be true, namely, that Judaism was that very heresy (”’the worship of Moloch”) which Disraeli spurned, and which Jesus came to change…

    Karl Marx and his Communist Manifesto were the outward and visible signs of a significant historic event: Talmudic Judaism had taken over the world-revolution…

    That verdict of 1951 is obviously true and agrees with the contemporary one of the revolutionary eye-witness Benoit Malon: “Communism was handed down in the dark through the secret societies of the 19th Century.”

    Thus when Disraeli died the thing he had striven to avoid had come about: the “secret societies had been welded into one world-revolutionary movement under Jewish control, and this was preparing to blow up the foundations of the 20th Century…

    The sequence of events is significant. In 1772 Poland was partitioned and, after more than 2,500 years, the “centre” of Jewish Government “ceased to exist” (according to Dr. Kastein) or became a secret Jewish government (as the Russian authorities believed). In 1776 Adam Weishaupt founded his Illuminati. By 1846 Disraeli was writing that “the revolution is developing entirely under Jewish auspices”. In 1869 Michel Bakunin, the disciple of Weishaupt, attacked the Jews in the revolutionary movement. In 1872 Bakunin was expelled and the united Communist movement plainly emerged, under Karl Marx (in 1917 it produced an almost exclusively Jewish Bolshevist government).

    Such was the result, foretold by Disraeli, of the removal of Jewish disabilities and of a few decades of Jewish emancipation. The lowering of the barriers had not had the effect of amalgamating the Jews in the comity of peoples, its consequences had been to give “the most formidable sect (Bakunin’s words) freedom to work for the ruination of these peoples by revolution. The responses given by the Sanhedrin to Napoleon’s questions at the century’s start by its middle-age had been shown to be void of force. Jews would not thenceforward be allowed to involve themselves, with other men, in the nationhoods and laws of the lands where they dwelt; on the contrary, identification with the world­ revolution set them more apart from others than even they had ever been before. The century of emancipation had been turned into a fraud even before it ended.

    During the 19th Century (as Dr . Kastein, again, records) the term “antisemitism” was born, for “persecution” could no longer be said to exist, some new word had to be found, capable of intimidating Gentiles and terrifying Jews, the second purpose being more important than the first, and “antisemitism” was invented. “Abracadabra” might have served as weIl for the term ….antisemitism.. is patently absurd in relation to people who are demonstrably not Semites and whose Law commands the extirpation of Semites (the Arab peoples of Palestine, any expression of sympathy with the Semitic Arabs, expelled from their native land by the Zionist intruders in 1948, in time came to be attacked as “antisemitism”)…

    Contemplated in that historical perspective, the threefold purposes of the grand design become clear, and events have demonstrated them. First, through revolution the process of emancipation (and therewith of Jewish assimilation in the West) might be reversed and the supremacy of the ruling sect in Jewry maintained. Second, through revolution vengeance might be taken on Christendom for the expulsion from Spain. or perhaps for the existence of Christendom (for that is the affront to which the Talmud is in effect the answer). Third, revolution would promote the fulfillment of The Law, which ordained the ruination of the heathen and the triumph of the Chosen People, or at any rate of the sect which used that beguiling term…

    Under The Law this destruction was not an end in itself; it was a means to the end laid down in The Law. The extirpation of nation-states was to be the essential prelude to the establishment of the triumphant nation-State, that of the chosen people in their promised land. Thus, in the middle of the last century, a second force also was brought into being in those same Eastern, Talmudic, ruled areas where the world-revolution received its shape and impetus…

    The dominant-force [Zionism] corrupted the governments of these states at the top level; the revolutionary-force [Communism] eroded their foundations at the bottom level…

    Thus the story of the emergence of Zionism from the ghettoes of Russia and of the delicate interplay between the two forces, the one coiling itself round the rulers of the West and the other undermining the structure of the nation-states, forms the next chapter of the controversy of Zion…

    Communism was designed to subvert the masses, it was the “great popular movement” foreseen by Disraeli, by means of which “the secret societies” were to work in unison for the disruption of Europe. Zionism set out to subvert rulers at the top. Neither force could have moved forward without the other, for rulers of unimpaired authority would have checked the revolution as it had been checked in 1848…

    He shows how, in those remote Talmudic communities nearly a hundred years ago, the strategy took shape which in its consequences was to catch up, as in a vortex, all peoples of the West. Americans and Britons, Germans and Frenchmen, Italians, Poles, Scandinavians, BaIts, the Balkanic peoples and all others were to be implicated. The lifeblood and treasure of the West were to be spent on the promotion of these two complementary purposes like water from a running tap…

    The remaining mass of Jews in Russia. (that is, those that lived in the ghettoes under Talmudic rule) were divided into two groups by a vertical line which split households and families, including Dr. Weizmann’s own house and family. Both groups were revolutionary, that is to say, they agreed in working for the destruction of Russia. The dissension was solely on the point of Zionism. The “Communist-revolutionary” group held that full “emancipation”, would be achieved when the world-revolution supplanted the nation-states everywhere. The “”Zionist-revolutionary group”, while agreeing that the world-revolution was indispensable to the process, held that full “emancipation”, would only be achieved when a Jewish nation was established in a Jewish state.
    Of these two groups, the Zionist one was clearly the superior in Talmudic orthodoxy, as destruction, under The Law, is but a means to the end of domination, and the dominant nation is that ordained to be set up in Jerusalem. In the households, dispute was fierce. The Communists maintained that Zionism would weaken the revolution, which professed to deny “race and creed”; the Zionists contended that revolution must lead to the restoration of the chosen people, of whom race was the creed…

    The [first World Zionist] congress was in fact a Sanhedrin summoned to cancel the avowals made by the Napoleonic Sanhedrin eighty years before. That Sanhedrin repudiated separate nationhood and any ambition to form a Jewish state, this one proclaimed separate nationhood and the ambition of statehood…

    Dr. Herzl found hiinself face to face with his masters and with the conspiracy, which through him was about to enter the West. He had declared war on emancipation and, like many successors, was unaware of the nature of the force he had released. He was soon left behind, a bugler whose task was done, while the real “managers” took over…

    Herzl’s method was to exploit this general fear for his particular end, the Jewish State. He offered domestic peace if it were supported and revolution if it were not and he claimed to speak in the name of all the Jews…

    The two forces moved forward together in synchronization (for Zionism, as has been shown, used the threat of Communism in Europe to gain the ear of European rulers for its territorial demand outside Europe). It was as if twin turbines began to revolve, generating what was in effect one force, from which the new century was to receive galvanic shocks…

    The Greek drama continued. Mr. Balfour’s prime-ministership ended in a fiasco for his party when in the 1906 election eight out of nine Manchester seats were lost to it. He then faded temporarily from office. At that moment another personage entered the present narrative. Among the triumphant Liberal candidates was a rising young man with a keen nose for political winds, a Mr. Winston Churchill. He also sought election in Manchester and commended himself to the Zionist headquarters there, first by attacking the Balfour government’s Aliens Bill (which set a brake on large-scale immigration from such places as Russia) and next by supporting Zionism. Thereon the Manchester Jews promptly fell into line behind him as though he were a kind of latterday Moses, one of their leaders got up at an all-Jewish-meeting and announced that “any Jew who votes against Churchill is a traitor to the common cause” (Mr. R.C. Taylor). Mr. Churchill, elected, became Under Secretary for the Colonies. His public espousal of Zionism was simply a significant episode at that time; three decades later, when Mr. Balfour was dead, it was to have consequences as fateful as Mr. Balfour’s own aberration…

    The later events showed that the Eastern conspiracy, in both its forms, entered America through this mass-immigration. The process of acquiring an ever-increasing measure of politicai power began, behind the scenes, about 1900 and was to become the major issue of American national life in the ensuing fifty years…

    Mr. House did not guide American State policy, but deflected it towards Zionism, the support of the world-revolution, and the promotion of the world-government ambition…

    Between 1900 and 1910 a million new Jewish immigrants arrived from Russia and under Zionist organization began to form an important body of voters…

    Mr. Wilson, under coaching for the campaign, made a speech on “The rights of the Jews”, in which he said, “I am not here to express our sympathy with our Jewish fellow­ citizens but to make evident our sense of identity with them. This is not their cause; it is America’s”…

    To the initiates it was a pledge to Zionism. It was also an oblique allusion and threat to Russia, for the implication of Mr.Wilson’s words was that he recognized the Jews in Russia (who were then the only organized Zionists) as representing all Jews. Thus he took the Balfourean part in the American production of this drama…

    Before the election Mr. House drew up a list of cabinet ministers (see Philip Dru) in consultation with a Mr. Bernard Baruch, who now enters this tale. He might be the most important of all the figures who will appear in it during the ensuing fifty years, for he was to become known as “the adviser” to several Presidents and in the 1950’s was still advising President Eisenhower and Mr. Winston Churchill. In 1912 he was publicly known only as a highly successful financier. His biographer states that he contributed $50,000 to Mr. Wilson’s campaign…

    In 1913 B’nai B’rith put out a tiny offshoot, the “Anti-Defamation League”. It was to grow to great size and power; in it the state-within-states acquired a kind of secret police and it will reappear in this story…

    In England in 1914 the situation brought about in America by the secret captivity of President Wilson did not prevail. The leading political and military posts were held by men who put every proposal for the political and military conduct of the war to one test: would it help win the war and was it in their country’s interest. By that test Zionism failed. The story of the first two years of the four-year war is that of the struggle behind the scenes to dislodge these obstructive men and to supplant them by other, submissive men…

    To the initiates they carried a commitment to support the plan, of which Zionism and Communism both were instruments, for establishing a “world federation” founded on force and the obliteration of nationhood, with the exception of one “nation” to be recreated…

    The draft experienced revealing adventures between October 9 and November 2, when it was published. It was sent to America, where it was edited by Mr. Brandeis, Mr. Jacob de Haas and Rabbi Wise before being shown to President Wilson for his ‘”final approval”. He simply sent it to Mr. Brandeis (who had already had it from Dr. Weizmann), who passed it to Rabbi Stephen Wise, “to be handed to Colonel House for transmission to the British Cabinet”…

    The conclusion cannot be escaped: if any honest explanation of his actions in this matter could be found Mr. Lloyd George would have given it. From this period in 1916-1917 the decay of parliamentary and representative government can be traced, both in England and America. If secret men could dictate major acts of American state policy and major operations of British armies, then clearly “election” and “responsible office” were terms devoid of meaning. Party distinctions began to fade in both countries, once this hidden, supreme authority was accepted by leading Western politicians, and the American and British electors began to be deprived of all true choice. Today this condition is general, and now is public. Leaders of all parties, before elections, make obeisance to Zionism, and the voter’s selection of president, prime minister or party makes no true difference…

    These records show that the Central Committee of the Bolshevik party, which wielded the supreme power, contained 3 Russians (including Lenin) and 9 Jews. The next body in importance, the Central Committee of the Executive Commission (or secret police) comprized 42 Jews and 19 Russians, Letts, Georgians and others. The Council of People’s Commissars consisted of 17 Jews and five others. The Moscow Che-ka (secret police) was formed of 23 Jews and 13 others. Among the names of 556 high officials of the Bolshevik state officially published in 1918-1919 were 458 Jews and 108 others. Among the central committees of small, supposedly ”’Socialist’· or other non-Communist parties (during that early period the semblance of “opposition” was permitted, to beguile the masses, accustomed under the Czar to opposition parties) were 55 Jews and 6 others. All the names are given in the original documents reproduced by Mr. Wilton. (In parentheses, the composition of the two short-lived Bolshevik governments outside Russia in 1918-1919, namely those of Hungary and Bavaria, was similar)…

    The law against “”anti-semitism” (which cannot be defined) was in itself a fingerprint. An illegal government, predominantly jewish, by this measure warned the Russian masses, under pain of death, not to interest themselves in the origins of the revolution. It meant in effect that the Talmud became the law of Russia, and in the subsequent four decades this law has in effect and in growing degree been made part of the structure of the west…

    The chief reason for recounting the details of the pogrom of the Romanoffs is to point to the “‘fingerprint” which was left in the room where it was done. One of the assassins, presumably their leader, stayed to exult and put a significant signature on the wall, which was covered with obscene or mocking inscriptions in Hebrew, Magyar and German. Among them was a couplet which deliberately related the deed to the Law of the Torah-Talmud and thus offered it to posterity as an example of the fulfilment of that law, and of Jewish vengeance as understood by the Levites. It was written in German by someone who parodied the Jewish poet, Heinrich Heine’s lines on the death of Belshazzar, the imaginary potentate whose murder is portrayed in Daniel as God’s punishment for an affront offered to Judah:

    Belshazzar became the same night
    Killed by the same servants.

    The parodist, sardonically surveying the shambles, adapted these lines to what he had just done:

    Belsatsar was the same night
    Killed by his servants.

    No clearer clue to motive and identity was ever left behind…

    At this period (1917­-1918) the student for the first time is able to establish that leading men began to give that secret support to Communism which they were already giving to its blood brother, Zionism…

    Both of them Russian-born . . . they had swayed the crowds of Jewish students from one side of the street to the other; Leon Trotsky, apostle of Red revolution; Chaim Weizmann, apostle of a tradition unbroken for two thousand years. Now by a most strange coincidence in the same week each of them accomplished the fulfilment of his dream”.
    In truth, the pincers in which the West was to be gripped had been forged, and each handle was held by one of two groups of revolutionaries “‘Russian-born” (but not Russian).

    For Dr. Weizmann and his associates in London and Washington, the event in Moscow was a passing embarrassment, in one respect. They had based their demand for Palestine on the legend that “a place of refuge” must be found for Jews “persecuted in Russia” (an obvious non sequitur but good enough for “the mob”), and now there was no “persecution in Russia”, On the contrary, in Moscow a Jewish regime ruled and “anti-Semitism” was a capital offence. Where, then, were the Jews who needed ‘”a place of refuge”? (This is evidently the reason why Mr. Robert Wilton had to be prevented from reporting the nature of the new regime in Moscow)…

    The corruption of the press (foretold by the Protocols) began with the censorship introduced during the First World War; the rise of the directing power behind the scenes had been shown by the cases of Colonel Repington, Mr. H.A. Gwynne and Mr. Robert Wilton in 1917-1918; experienced correspondents were driven to resign or to write books because their reports were ignored, burked, or suppressed; an editor who published the faithful report without submission to the censorship was prosecuted…

    ‘The fiasco of the ”’national home” was so clear that even the politicians began to hedge. Mr. Lloyd George in 1925 told the Zionists publicly “”any policy of expropriation or anything that suggests it will only make difficulties in the path of Zionism”. Dr. Weiznlann at once replied: “Mr. Lloyd George will believe me when I say that the Jews are the last people in the world to build their home on the back of somebody else. ‘The Jews have suffered so much from injustice that they have learned their lesson and I can assure you that the Arabs will not suffer at our hands”. Again “the word” invites comparison with “the deed” that ensued later…

    Mr. LJoyd George in 1925 told the Zionists publicly “”any policy of expropriation or anything that suggests it will only make difficulties in the path of Zionism”. Dr. Weiznlann at once replied: “Mr. Lloyd George will believe me when I say that the Jews are the last people in the world to build their home on the backs of somebody else. The Jews have suffered so much from injustice that they have learned their lesson and I can assure you that the Arabs will not suffer at our hands”…

    The emancipated Jews could have offered effective opposition to the Zionists if they had formed an anti­ Zionist organization. They feared to do so, and this was their undoing. ‘They did not want Zionist nationalism and a Jewish state, but they did want the Judaist Mecca, the cultural and religious centre, and feared that the term “anti-Zionist” would imply antagonism to that. Through this chink in their armour Dr. Weiztnann unerringly reached…

    The gap left by the collapse, in 1917, of the legend of “Jewish persecution in Russia” was filled by ….the Jewish persecution in Germany” and, just when Zionism was “helpless and hopeless”, the Zionists were able with a new cry to affright the Jews and beleaguer the Western politicians. The consequences showed in the outcome of the ensuing war, when revolutionary-Zionism and revolutionary-Communism proved to be the sole beneficiaries…

    Mr. Roosevelt, after the Republican interregnum of 1921-1933, resumed the Wilson policies and in that spirit approached the major problem of America’s future at that moment: namely, whether the forces represented by the great Jewish immigration from Eastern Europe, which had occurred in the six decades following the Civil War, should or should not govern America. All competent authorities had observed – usually with foreboding – the rapid rise of this new problem in American life, and had depicted the effects of the transplantation to American soil of a large population-mass which, under its religious directors, rejected the concept of “the melting-pot” and of “assimilation”…

    Such was the background of the dominant issue in American life when Mr. Roosevelt became president. Between 1881 and 1920 over three million legally­ recorded immigrants entered the United States from Russia, most of them Jews. According to the United States Census Bureau the country contained 230,000 Jews in 1877 and about 4,500,000 in 1926…

    The next Congress went much further than the general statement above quoted; it was specific about the danger, the same Committee reporting:
    “If the principle of individual liberty, guarded by a constitutional government, created on this continent nearly a century and half ago is to endure, the basic strain of our population must be maintained and our economic standards preserved . . . The American people do not concede the right of any foreign group … to dictate the character of our legislation”.

    The years which then followed showed that the effect of Mr. Roosevelt’s presidency would be further to break down the principle stated, to alter “the basic strain”, and to enable “a foreign group” to dictate State policy…

    Therefore Mr Long, although he could not have become president at that time, certainly could have prevented Mr. Roosevelt’s re-election, and the ruling few suddenly beheld a disturber of their regime. However, as Mr. Flynn says, ”Fate had gone Democratic and remained so”; on September 8, 1935 Mr. Long was shot in the Louisiana State Capitol by a young Jew, Dr. Carl Austin Weiss. The motive will never be known because Dr. Weiss, who might have explained it, was shot by Mr. Long’s tardy bodyguard…

    Mr. Brandeis in America similarly, and imperially, decreed that “No Jew must live in Germany”. Mr. Churchill desired that “three or four million Jews” should be transplanted to Palestine; the Communist state, by profession anti-Zionist, supplied the first contingent of these.

    When the smoke of battle cleared only three purposes had been achieved, none of them disclosed at its start: the world-revolution, with Western arms and support, had advanced to the middle of Europe; Zionism had been armed to establish itself in Palestine by force; the one-world-government”, obviously the result which these two convergent forces were intended to produce, had been set up anew in embryo form, this time in New York. The war behind the war was the true one; it was fought to divert the arms, manpower and treasure of the West to these purposes. Through the dissolving fog of war the shape of the great “design” first revealed by Weishaupt’s paper, and exposed again in the Protocols, showed clear…

    The war was hardly begun when Dr. Weizmann appeared in Mr. Churchill’s offIce. Unknown to the general public, this remarkable man for thirty-three years (from the day of his interview with Mr. Balfour) had exercised mastery over the politicians of England and America. His person cannot have inspired such awe, so that they must have seen in him the representative of a force which cowed them; the one which Dr. Kastein called “the Jewish international” and Mr. Neville Chamberlain “international Jewry”.

    Mr. Churchill. returned to office after ten years as First Lord of the Admiralty, presumably should have been absorbed by the war at sea, but Dr. Weizmann was concerned with other things. He said, “after the war we would want to build up a state (“three or four million Jews in Palestine” and states that Mr. Churchill replied, “Yes, indeed, I quite agree with that”. Mr. Churchill, twelve months earlier, had called for “solemn assurances” to the Arabs that Zionist imnligration would be regulated and restricted…

    The ground had been prepared for him in America, where Rabbi Stephen Wise was instructing President Roosevelt (as he had instructed the long-dead President Wilson) about his duty towards Zionism: “‘On May 13,1941 I found it necessary to send the president firsthand reports from Palestine” (the rabbi’s firsthand reports about a “‘reported” pogrom in 1933 had produced the boycott in New York) ….and write about the imperilled status of the unarmed Jews . . . The British Government ought to he made to understand how enormous would he the shock and how, damaging its effect upon the democratic cause, if there should be a general slaughter because of failure adequately to arm the Jews as well as to strengthen the defences of Palestine with guns, tanks and planes”.
    The president replied, “I can merely call to the attention of the British our deep interest in the defence of Palestine and our concern for the defence of the Jewish population there; and, as best I can, supply the British forces with the material means by which the maximum protection to Palestine will be afforded”. Equipped with this letter (as Dr. Weizlnann once with a report of an interview written on British Foreign Office letter-paper) Rabbi Stephen Wise “‘the next day left for Washington, and after conference with high government officials felt more confident that the British would be made to understand that there must be adequate equipment (guns, tanks and planes) for our people in Palestine . .. And probably thanks to the intervention of Mr. Roosevelt, the business of parity had been dropped to a large extent” (the last allusion is to the insistence of responsible British administrators that, if arms were being handed around, Arabs and Zionists in equal numbers should be armed in Palestine; even Mr. Churchill had found difficulty in resisting this proposal).

    These Zionist potentates in the various countries applied “‘irresistible pressure on international politics” in perfect synchronization. If London lagged in compliance, it was “‘made to understand” by Washington; had the positions been reversed the procedure would have been the opposite. Thus the mechanism had been well oiled when Dr. Weizmann arrived and he soon satisfied himself that “‘the top political leaders” showed “real sympathy for our Zionist aspirations”…

    At this stage he began close co-operation with Mr. Henry Morgenthau, junior, of the president’s inner circle, who was to prove of “peculiar assistance” at the later, decisive moment…

    For nearly forty years, at that time, Dr. Weizmann had worked “behind the scenes”, deviously and in secret; history shows no comparable case. At one more behind-the-scenes meeting with President Roosevelt he then imparted Mr. Churchill’s message, or rather (according to his own account) a different one: he said Mr. Churchill had assured him that “the end of the war would see a change in the status of the Jewish National Home, and that the White Paper of 1939 would go”…

    Mr. Roosevelts achievement may now be seen to have been threefold and in each respect perilous to his country’s future: he helped to arm Zionism, he armed the revolution in its Moscow citadel; and he opened the doors of his American citadel to its agents…

    Mr. Roosevelt began by breaking down the barriers against uncontrolled immigration which the Congresses immediately before him strove to set up; because they saw in it the danger of the capture of the American administration by “a foreign group”. Under various of his edicts the supervision of immigration was greatly weakened. Immigration officials were forbidden to put questions about communist associations; and the separate classification of Jewish immigrants was discontinued. “this was supported by a continuous press campaign against all demands for enquiry into loyalty or political record as “discrimination against the foreign-born”.

    None can say how many people entered the United States during that period. By 1952 Senator Pat McCarran, chairman of the United States Senate Judiciary Committee, estimated that apart from legal immigration, five rnillion aliens had illegally entered the country, including large numbers of “militant communists, Sicilian bandits and other criminals”.

    This mass of immigrants went to swell the size of the “fluctuating vote” on which Mr. Roosevelt’s party (still following Mr. House’s strategy) concentrated its electoral effort and its cry of “no discrimination”. Under the president’s restrictions on loyalty-interrogations the way into the civil service and armed forces was opened to American-born or legally-domiciled alien Communists…

    The renewal of large-scale immigration formed the background to the political invasion of the Republic. This was a three-pronged movement which aimed at the capture of the three vital points of a state’s defences: state policy at the top level, the civil services at the middle level and “public opinion” or the mass-mind at the base…

    This form of political invasion is called by Dr. Weizmann, who exhaustively studied it in his youth, when he was preparing in Russia for his life’s work in the west, “the technique of propaganda and the approach to the masses”.

    Far back in this book the reader was invited to note that “B’nai B’rith” put out a shoot… The little offshoot of 1913, the “Anti-Defamation League”, had by 1947 become a secret police of formidable power in America. *
    In Doublespeak “anti-defamation” means “defamation” and this body lived by calumny, using such terms as anti-semite, fascist, rabble-rouser, Jew-baiter, Red-baiter, paranoiac, lunatic, madman, reactionary, diehard, bigot and more of the like…

    Under this regime reasoned debate became outlawed; there is something of sorcery in this subjugation of two generations of Western men to the mumbo­
    jumbo of Asiatic conspirators…

    the first Bolshevist administration in Russia, the “law against anti-semitism” introduced on July 27, 1918…

    Therefore the authors of the vengeance of 1945 must be sought in the revolutionary area, and for this reason the nature of the revolution in 1945 may be examined, to discover whether it, and its leadership, had changed from 1917 (when it was ninety percent Jewish) and 1848 (when Disraeli said it was led by Jews)…

    In my opinion the directing force of the revolution was from 1848 onward demonstrably that of the Talmudic rabbinate in the East, and in that sense “the revolution” was “a Jewish conspiracy”…

    Thus the identity of the managers of the revolution did not change substantially between 1917 and 1939, they withdrew from most of the frontal places but retained the true “levers of control’…

    This is an interesting case of the dissension in a Jewish family described by Dr. Weizmann in his account of his boyhood in Russia, where Jewish households were split between “revolutionary-Communism” and “revolutionary-Zionism”, and only in that question…

    This was the requital for Mr. Churchill’s forty years of support for Zionism, he had not actually ordered British troops to clear Palestine of Arabs and, for a while, was an enemy…

    Among the victorious Socialists a worthy party-man, one Mr. Hall, inherited the Colonial Office from Lord Lloyd, Lord Moyne and others dead or defamed, and was barely in it when a deputation from the World Zionist Congress arrived:
    “I must say the attitude adopted by the members of the deputation was different from anything which I have ever experienced. It was not a request for the consideration by His Majesty’s Government of the decisions of the Zionist conference, but a demand that His Majesty’s Government should do what the Zionist Organization desired them to do”…

    Dr. Weizmann knew exactly what was at stake and in his old age shrank from the prospect that reopened before him: reversion to the worship of Moloch, the god of blood. He had seen so much blood shed in the name of revolutionary-Communism and revolutionary-Zionism, the two causes which had dominated his parental home and home town in the Pale…

    Dr. Weizmann (though deposed by the Zionist Organization for his warnings against terrorism) was once more the chief authority heard by UNSCOP in Jerusalem, and then quickly returned to New York where, in October and November of 1947, he dominated the hidden scene as lobbyist supreme. “irresistible pressure” operated with relentless force…

    In these circumstances the successful candidate could only feel that election was a reward for “supporting partition” in November 1947 and “granting recognition” in May 1948; nothing could more clearly illustrate the vast change which the mass­ immigration of Eastern Jews, in the period following the Civil War, had brought about in the affairs of the American Republic…

    (if American troops in the 1950’s or 1960’s find themselves in the Near East, any of them who have read Mr. Forrestal’s Diaries should know how they came to be there)…

    on November 29, 1947 the General Assembly of the United Nations recommended (Zionist propaganda always says “decided”) that “independent Arab and Jewish states, and the specific international regime for the City of Jerusalem” should come into existence after termination of the British “Mandate” on August 1, 1948…

    Dr. Weizmann then had called “the terror in Palestine” the “old evil in a new and horrible guise”. April 9, 1948 showed what he meant, and in particular why he called it the old evil. On that day the “activists”, the terror-and-assassination group of Zionism, “utterly destroyed” an Arab village in exact and literal fulfilment of ”the Law” laid down in Deuteronomy (which, the reader will recall, is the basic Judaic law but was itself an amendment of the original Mosaic law of the Israelites)…

    Thereon alrnost the entire Arab population of Palestine fled into the neighbouring Arab states.
    The massacre at Deir Yasin was briefly reported in the West, for instance Time Magazine of New York said:
    “Jewish terrorists of the Stern Gang and Irgun Zvai Leumi stormed the village of Deir Yasin and butchered everyone in sight. The corpses of 250 Arabs, mostly women and small children, were later found tossed into wells”.

    At the Versailles Peace Conference in 1919 Dr. Weizmann had declared, “”The Bible is our mandate”, and the words sounded good to Western ears. This event showed what they meant, and the same words were repeated by the Zionist leaders in Palestine thirty years after Dr. Weizmann used them. The massacre at Deir Yasin was an act of “observance” of the ancient “statutes and commandments”, including the relevant passage in Deuteronomy, “When the Lord thy God shall bring thee into the land whither thou goest to possess it, and shall cast out … seven nations greater and mightier than thou … then thou shalt utterly destroy them; thou shalt make no covenant with them, nor show mercy unto them”, and the related passage, “thou shalt save alive nothing that breatheth, but thou shalt utterly destroy them”. There are seven Arab states today, and each of them has its share of the fugitives of 1948, who for eight years now have been a living reminder to them of the common future fate with which Zionism threatens them under the ancient Law.

    The passive condonation of this deed by Jewry as a whole showed more clearly than anything else the change which Zionism had wrought in the Jewish mind in a few years. Writing in 1933 (only fifteen years before Deir Yasin), Mr. Bernard J. Brown quoted the above passage from Deuteronomy as the reason for Arab fears, and added, “”Of course, the uncultured Arabs do not understand that the modern Jew does not take his bible literally, and that he is a kind and charitable person and would not be so cruel to his fellow-man, but he suspects that if the Jews bottom their claim to Palestine on the strength of the historic rights to that land, they can only do so on the authority of the Bible, and the Arab refuses to reject any part of it”. The Arabs were right and Mr. Brown was wrong; this enlightened Western Jew could not conceive, in 1933, that Zionism meant a full return to the superstition of antiquity in its most barbaric form…

    All impartial authorities agree about the intention and effect of Deir Yasin, and from April 9, 1948 no doubt remained about the governing force of the ancient Judaic Law on all future acts and ambitions of Zion…

    As the days passed, and the news from Deir Yasin flickered briefly over the tapes, [Dr. Weizmann] laboured tirelessly at his supreme task: the winning of “recognition” for the Jewish State set up by the terrorists at Deir Yasin…

    Dates are again significant. On May 13 1948 Dr. Weizmann saw President Truman, the contest for the presidential nominations then lay immediately ahead and the presidential election a few months beyond, so that this was the ideal moment to apply “irresistible pressure”. Dr. Weizmann informed President Truman that the British mandate would end on May 15 and a provisional government would then take over “the Jewish state”. He urged that the United States “promptly” recognize it and the President acted with zealous alacrity…

    “I [Dr. Weizmann] am certain that the world will judge the Jewish state by what it will do with the Arabs”…

    The Iron Curtain, which had opened to let the invaders of Palestine leave, opened again to allow arms to reach them in decisive quantities.
    This was the first major consequence of General Eisenhower’s order, issued under President Roosevelt’s direction, to halt the Allied armies west of the Berlin-Vienna line and allow Czechoslovakia to fall to the Soviet: the arms came from that captive country, where the great Skoda arsenal, as a result of his order, had merely passed from Nazi into Communist hands…

    Speaking at Tel Aviv during an election campaign in 1950, Mr. Begin claimed credit for the foundation ofthe Zionist state, through the deed at Deir Yasin. He said the Irgun had “occupied Jaffa”, which the government party “had been ready to hand over to the Arabs”, and added:
    “The other part of the Irgun’s contribution was Deir Yasin, which has caused the Arabs to leave the country and make room for the newcomers. Without Deir Yasin and the subsequent Arab rout, the present government could not absorb one-tenth of the immigrants.”…

    For five years the public pretence was maintained that “the terrorists” had acted without authority at Deir Yasin and then, in April 1953, four Irgun men wounded at Deir Yasin claimed compensation. The Israeli government, through its Ministry of Security, denied the claim on the ground that the attack was “unauthorised”, whereon the Irgun commander produced a letter from the official Zionist military headquarters in Jerusalem authorizing the action. By that time the signatory was Israeli Minister in Brazil…

    The “rigging” of the American electoral system is the determining factor in the events of the 20th Century. A mechanism originally designed to enable John Doe to express his opinion about policies and parties has been adjusted to such a point of nicety, almost precluding error, that he is left without voice in his national affairs; no matter what coin he inserts in which slot, the governing syndicate wins…

    When 1948 ended, thirty-one years after the first triumph of the dual­ conspiracy (the Balfour Declaration and the Bolshevik revolution) the Zionist state had been set up…

    The captivity of the London and Washington governments, and the identity of the captors, even today (1956) is not realized by the American and British masses (though the now apparent danger of a new world war beginning in and spreading outward from Zionised Palestine is for the first time disquietening them). In the rest of the world it has long been understood. As long ago as the 1920’s for instance, the Maharajah of Kashmir asked Sir Arthur Lothian (as that British diplomat relates), “why the British government was establishing a ‘Yehudi ka Raj’ (Rule of the Jews) in India. I demurred to this description, but he insisted that it was true, saying the Viceroy, Lord Reading, was a Jew, the Secretary of State, Mr. Edwin Montague, was a Jew, the High Commissioner, Sir William Meyer, was a Jew, and what more evidence did I want?” Thus a remote Indian Maharajah, thirty years ago, clearly saw the true shape of coming events in the Western world…

    Probably the most characteristic passage in this typical statement is that which refers to “resettling Jews driven out of Europe by the Nazis”. Israel is the one place in the world where the numbers of the Jewish population may with accuracy be learned. According to Israeli government statistics, it was about 1,400,000 in 1953, and among these were only 63,000 Jews (less than five percent) from Germany and Austria. These 63,000 were the only inhabitants of Israel who by any stretch of imagination might have been said to have been driven out of Europe and to resettle in Israel. The great mass came from Poland, Rumania, Hungary and Bulgaria some time after the war’s end (and certainly were not “driven out” as they were protected in those countries by special laws and preference in state employment) or from North Africa…

    During the period of violence in Palestine which culminated in the pogrom of Arabs at Deir Yasin, this Mr. Hecht inserted a full-page advertisement in many of the leading newspapers throughout America. It was addressed “To the Terrorists of Palestine” and included this message:
    “The Jews of America are for you. You are their champions . . . Every time you blow up a British arsenal, or wreck a British railroad train sky high, or rob a British bank, or let go with your guns and bombs at the British betrayers and invaders of your homeland, the Jews of America make a little holiday in their hearts” …

    By March 1939 Mr. Winston Churchill felt able to inform Mr. Baruch (then in residence at his Barony in South Carolina) that “War is corning very soon … You will be running the show over there”…

    His biographer quotes: “Of course we can flx the world, Baruch has said on many occasions”. And then, during the Second War, “Baruch had agreed with President Roosevelt and other leaders that a world organization should be established at the height of allied unity in the war”…

    The disclosure in 1946 of his plan “to fix the world” gave that world a glimpse of what it might expect to be attempted in the later stages and aftermath of any third war; the “global plan” was fully revealed. In 1947 Mr. Baruch stated that his father “came to this country a hundred years ago”. The case offers the most significant example of the effect on America, and through America on world affairs, of the “new immigration” of the 19th Century. After just that hundred years the son had already for nearly forty years been one of the most powerful men in the world, though he worked “in the long grass . . . out of sight”, and he was to continue this work for at least another ten years…

    The first fifty years of “the Jewish century” have had their natural effect on the Jewish soul, which once again is in violent unrest. They have made chauvinists of a mass of Jews who, a hundred and fifty years ago, seemed committed to involvement in mankind. They are once more in captivity (the recurrent “captivities” of the Jews were always captivity by the elders and their creed of exclusion, not by alien taskmasters). In the Zionist captivity, and under the pressure of the elders, they have been made into the most explosive force in recorded history. The story of this century, of its wars and revolutions and the denouenlent yet to come, is that of Talmudic chauvinism, which has its roots in Deuteronomy.

    The very word “chauvinism” means an extravagant emotion… Nevertheless, the word is inadequate to describe the effect of Talmudic Zionism on the Jewish soul; no word exists, other than “Talmudism”, for this unique and boundless frenzy.

    In 1933 Mr. Bernard J. Brown wrote, “Being consciously Jewish is the lowest kind of chauvinism, for it is the only chauvinism that is based on false premises”. The premises are those of the Talmud-Torah; namely, that God promised a certain tribe imperial supremacy over all enslaved others in this world, and exclusive inheritance of the next world in return for strict observance of a Law based on blood sacrifice and the destruction or enslavement of the lesser breeds without this Law. Whether Talmudic chauvinisln or Zionist chauvinism (I believe either term is more correct than Mr. Brown’s “Jewish chauvinism”) is or is not “the lowest kind” of chauvinism, these fifty years have shown that it is the most violent kind yet known to man…

    The Zionist state itself. as I have shown, was founded on a deed of ”utter destruction”, and thus of literal “observance” of this Law, at Deir Yasin…

    The revolution and Zionism are both essential to the Deuteronomic Talmudic concept. and both movements, in my estimate, were developed under Talmudic direction…

    Mr. Arthur Koestler, describing his scrutiny of Judaism, wrote, “Most bewildering of all was the discovery that the saga of the ‘Chosen Race’ seemed to be taken quite literally by traditionalist Jews. They protested against racial discrimination, and affirmed in the same breath their racial superiority based on Jacob’s covenant with God”. The effect of this “bewildering discovery” on this particular Jewish soul was that “the more I found out about Judaism the more distressed I became, and the more fervently Zionist”…

    Mr.Hecht once wrote, “I lived forty years in my country” (America) “without encountering anti-semitism or concerning myself even remotely with its existence”. Therefore Mr. Hecht logically intended to live nowhere else. Nevertheless, when the Zionist state was being set up, he wrote that every time a British soldier was killed in Palestine “the Jews of America make a little holiday in their hearts”…

    Other latterday Jewish remonstrants raised the ancient cry of a coming “catastrophe”. In 1933 Mr. Bernard J. Brown had seen disaster coming: “Never in the history of the human race has there ever been a group of people who have enmeshed themselves into so many errors and persisted in refusing to see the truth, as our people have done during the last three hundred years” (the period which saw the emergence of the Talmudic “‘Eastern Jews” and the victorious Talmudist war against Jewish assimilation)…

    The influence of his heredity and upbringing were still strong enough in him, a Catholic in North America, to form his first thought in those terms: the ordeal of 350,000,000 souls in Europe, which has left nearly half of them enslaved, was “the great Jewish catastrophe”…

    Before studying the examples which follow, the reader might consider that the great mass of “explosive Eastern Jews” is now in America. This fact, more pregnant with possible consequences than any other of our day, seems scarcely to have entered the consciousness of the Western world, or even of America…

    He concludes, therefore, that American Jews should be propagandized to become only ‘Lovers of Israel’, not actual Israelis in body and soul”…

    Unless that happens the concluding decades of this century foreseeably will see either the fiasco or the transient triumph of Talmudic chauvinisrn. Either way, in failure or success, the accompanying “catastrophe” would be that of the non­ Jewish masses and Jewish suffering would be a minute fraction of it.
    Afterwards, as the world obviously will not accept the Talmud, the Jews would at last have to accept the world as it is…

    In 1953 Sovietized Russia was held up as the new anti-semitic monster, as Germany was held up in 1939 and Czarist Russia in 1914. This all-obscuring issue, to judge by the propagandist hubbub of that period, would again have befogged the battle and deceived the nations…

    Mr. Ilya Ehrenburg, whose broadcasts to the Red Armies as they advanced into Europe incited them not to spare “even unborn Fascists”. A few days before he died Stalin prompted the Red Star to state that the struggle against “Zionism had nothing to do with anti-semitism; Zionism is the enemy of the working people all over the world, of Jews no less than Gentiles”…

    The menace was always implicitly the same: ”Persecute men if you will, but you will be destroyed if you oppose the Jews”…

    The masses in Russia, and later in the other countries which were abandoned to Communism, could not rise against the terror without being accused of “anti-semitism,” because the terror was always a Jewish and Talmudic terror, thus identifiable by its acts, and not a Russian, Communist or Soviet terror…

    “In Czechoslovakia, as elsewhere in Central and South­ Eastern Europe, both the party intellectuals and the key men in the secret police are largely Jewish in origin; the man in the street, therefore, has been inclined to equate the party cares with the Jews and to blame the ‘Jewish Communists’ for all his troubles” (New Statesman, 1952);”…

    Once more revolutionary-Communism and revolutionary-Zionism worked as in perfect synchronization, as in October 1917; the acts of each directly benefited the other…

    The creation of the Zionist state proved to be even more ill-omened than the other creation of the Talmudic Jews in Russia, the Communist revolution…

    Assured of this unstinting monetary backing, and of a political support in Washington which could not change, the new state set out on its grandiose ambition: to restore to full force, in the 20th Century of our era, the “New Law” promulgated by the Levites in Deuteronomy in 621 B.C. All that was to come was to be “fulfilment” of it; the Mongolian Chazars were to see that Jehovah kept his compact, as the Levites had published it. And what ensued was in fact an instalment on account of this “fulfilment”; the vision of “the heathen” bringing the treasures of the earth to Jerusalem began to become reality in the form of American money, German tribute and the like…

    “In essence, the political support the state of Israel has in the United States makes any settlement antagonistic to Israeli interests irnpossible for a United States administration to contemplate” (1956). If this merely alludes to control of the election-machine, it means that the process of parliamentary government through “free elections” has been completely falsified. In my opinion, that is the case in the West in this century…

    Assured of this unstinting monetary backing, and of a political support in Washington which could not change, the new state set out on its grandiose ambition: to restore to full force, in the 20th Century of our era, the ‘”New Law” promulgated by the Levites in Deuteronomy in 621 B.C. All that was to come was to be “fulfilment” of it; the Mongolian Chazars were to see that Jehovah kept his compact, as the Levites had published it. And what ensued was in fact an instalment on account of this “fulfilment”; the vision of ”the heathen” bringing the treasures of the earth to Jerusalem began to become reality in the form of American money, German tribute and the like.
    With a purse thus filled, the little state began to pursue the fantasy of entire and literal “fulfIlment”, which in the miraculous end is to see all the great ones of the earth humbled, Zion all-powerful and all the Jews “gathered”…

    The world would have raised a pandemonium of protest if a Kaiser or a Hitler had said such things. The ambition expressed by such words as “the full and undiminished programme of Zionism” is in fact boundless, for it is the political programme contained, in the guise of a compact with Jehovah, in the Torah; world dominion over ”the heathen”, wielded from an empire stretching from the Nile to the Euphrates. The support of Western governments gave reality to what otherwise would be the most absurd pretension in all history…

    “Activism” was always, from the old days in Russia, an euphelnism for violence in the forms of terror and assassination. From the moment when this word reappeared in the news the student of Zionism knew what to expect before the year’s end…

    Therefore the last section of this chapter and book must survey again the workings of “irresistible pressure” behind the Western scene, this time in the phase of the approaching climacteric, the years 1952-1956. At the end of this phase revolutionary-Communism and revolutionary-Zionism, the twin destructive forces released from the Talmudic areas of Russia in the last century, were in extremis. By the act of the West, in the autumn of 1956, both were reprieved for further destruction…

    This event showed, long before the actual election, that the nomination-mechanism had been so mastered that neither party could even nominate any but a candidate approved by powerful selectors behind the scene. The outcome of the presidential election itself is in these circumstances of relatively little account in America today, nor can the observer picture how the Republic might escape from this occult control. It is not possible for either party to nominate its party-leader, or any other man, unless he has been passed as acceptable to “the internationalists” beforehand…

    On April 24, in Jerusalem, Mr. Ben­ Gurion once more proclaimed the nationalist and expansionist aim: “The continued ingathering of exiles is the supreme goal of Israel and an essential precondition for realization of the messianic mission which has made us an eternal people.”…

    The American people in general know nothing of what “The Voice of America” says, or to whom it speaks. Even my research has not discovered what official department is supposed to supervise this “”voice”, which to listening peoples far away is taken to express the intentions of the American Government. I was able to learn that its funds, budgetary and other, are immense and that it is largely staffed by Eastern Jews. It appears to work in irresponsibility and secrecy.

    From this moment the whole weight of Western propaganda was turned against Egypt. The events which followed might be considered in the light of Secretary of War Henry Stimson’s diarial note in the period preceding Pearl Harbour, to the effect that the aim of President Roosevelt’s administration was to manoeuvre Japan into “firing the first shot”. Subsequent events had all the appearance of being designed to manoeuvre Egypt into firing the first shot. Egypt did not do this. Then the world found that the firing of a first shot was no longer necessary to qualify as an aggressor; the country in question could be dubbed the aggressor while it was being invaded, and even before that; so far had the resources of mass-propaganda developed in the 20th century…

    From that moment President Nasser received the “wicked man” treatment; this is the sure sign of the imminence of war. I have seen many “wicked men” built up in my life, and have observed that this propaganda can be turned on and off as by a tap, and infused with toxic effect into the public mind…

    The state of servitude into which England had fallen at this period was shown by two symbolic events. In June 1956 the “Anglo-Jewish Community” held a banquet at the Guildhall to commemorate “the three hundredth anniversary of the resettlement of the Jews in the British Isles”; the young Queen’s consort, the Duke of Edinburgh, was required to appear in a Jewish skullcap. In September the “Cromwell Association” held a service at the statue of the regicide and butcher of Drogheda to celebrate this same fiction (that he “restored” the Jews to England three hundred years before). In his speech the president of this body, a Mr Isaac Foot, recommended that the young Prince Charles, when he reached the throne, take the name of “Oliver II” because “We don’t want Charles III”…

    In any case, the only effective answer, if his act was intolerable, was to reoccupy the Canal forthwith, and that was not done. Instead, all the oracles, as if reading from a long-prepared script, began to dub him “Hitler”. Premier Ben­ Gurion began with ”dictator”, which soon became “Fascist dictator; and the French Prime Minister (a M. Guy Mollet at that instant) changed this to “Hitler”. Thereafter the campaign followed the lines of the one against Stalin in 1952-3. Dictator-Fascist Dictator-Hitler: the inference was plain; President Nasser was to be depicted, and punished ifhe were punished, as an enemy of the Jews…

    These two policy statements gave the picture of a world in the Zionist thrall, and complemented the statements then being made by the British Government. They had no relation to any native American interest but reflected simply Zionist control of the election-machine, or the unshakeable belief of the party-managers in that control…

    Mr Eisenhower was able to present a face of patient suffering to his people when he appeared on the television screen with the words, “We believe it” (the attack) “to have been taken in error for we do not accept the use of force as a wise or proper instrument for the settlement of international disputes”…

    The ultimate “internationalist” ambition is the world-government project, to be achieved through the convergent, destructive forces of revolutionary-Communism and revolutionary­-Zionism, and it is the essence of this ambition that the two great English-speaking countries on either side of the Atlantic be kept divided, for only through their division can empire be achieved. This ambition dominated the Second War…

    When was the case, for supporting “the fulfillment of Zionist aspirations”, ever put to the British elector in those terms?…

    Can time distil good of all this? Clearly it can and will; only for contemporaries is the needless turmoil in which we live infuriating. The first signs of the long­ delayed turn for the better begin to show. The nations which lie in the chains of revolutionary-Communism are beginning to throw them off: the Eastern European peoples yet may save themselves by their exertions and the rest of the captive West by their example. I believe the Jews of the world are equally beginning to see the error of revolutionary-Zionism, the twin of the other destructive movement, and as this century ends will at last decide to seek involvement in common mankind.*

    *A development which may have been foreshadowed by a report (if it was accurate, l published in the New York Times on December 30, 1956, that “fewer than 900 of the 14,000 Jews who have fled from Hungary … have decided to resettle in Israel”, the “vast majority” preferring to go to America or Canada. On the other hand, if they follow the example of their predecessors they will swell the mass of “explosive” Eastern Jews there whose transplantation, during the last seventy years, has produced the present situation: the incitement of these against America was shown by quotation from Jewish authorities in the preceding chapter…

    I have seen more of the events of our century and of the secret perversions of national purposes than most, and have discovered through this experience that it was not all chance, but design…

    In our time, I judge, a barbaric superstition born in antiquity and nurtured through the ages by a semi-secret priesthood, has returned to plague us in the form of a political movement supported by great wealth and power in all great capitals of the world. Through the two methods used, revolution from below and the corruption of governments from above, it has come far towards success in a fantastic ambition of achieving world dominion, using these two instruments to incite nations against each other…

    In my judgment we have to deal with a force, released on the world in the 20th Century, the leaders of which think in terms of such superstitions; to what else can Dr. Chaim Weizmann’s belated, tormented words have alluded, ” …the resurgence of the old evil in a new and more horrible guise”.
    Only this element of dark superstition, in my estimate, can account for the fear to which the Jewish masses yield, when they surrender to Zionist nationalism. They were almost liberated from it by the century of emancipation and in another fifty years would have been involved in mankind, but now have been drawn back into its clutch…

    In this 20th Century process, which I feel as an accompanying “evil presence” all of us now alive, Jew and Gentile, are involved, and most of us will see the denouement. As to that Mr. Bernard J. Brown in 1933 misgivingly wrote, “Of course we must be feared and eventually hated if we persist in absorbing everything America offers us and yet refuse to become Americans just as we have always refused to become Russians or Poles.”
    This statement applies to all countries of the West, not only to America, but Mr Brown was wrong. What he foresaw is one thing the Talmudists cannot achieve; hatred is their monopoly, and creed, and they cannot make Christians, or Gentiles, hate Jews. The hateful things done by the West in this century were done under Talmudic prompting; hatred and vengeance are not innate in Westerners, and their faith forbids these. The teaching of hatred, as part of a religion, still comes only from the literal Torah-Talmudists in the revolutionary area, in Palestine, and where they have nested in the Western capitals. No Westerner would speak as a Zionist leader spoke to a Jewish meeting at Johannesburg in May, 1953: “The beast that is called Germany must not be trusted. The Germans must never be forgiven and the Jews must never have any contact or dealings with the Gennans”.
    The world cannot live like that and for this reason the insensate plan must ultimately fail. This is the heresy which the teaching of Christ above all else repudiated, it is the one to which the political leaders of the West have lent themselves since Mr Balfour, just fifty years ago, began to subordinate national policy to it. When the approaching climax has been overcome this heretic teaching, injected into the West from the Talmudic centre in Russia, will pass.
    As a writer, I believe it will pass sooner and with less trouble for all involved, the more the general masses know about what has gone on in these fifty years.

  149. Z-man says:
    @Richard B

    Far and Wide, 1951 and the pre WWII essay How Odd of God* are Reed jems.
    *To pick the Jews

    • Thanks: Richard B
  150. Skeptikal says:


    Thanks for the link.

    Can someone point me to The Controversy of Zion at TUR?

    I did some searches but can’t find it.


    • Replies: @John1955
    , @geokat62
  151. Anonymous[395] • Disclaimer says:

    The Achilles tendon of the Christian Zionists is Saul Alynsky. Hated by 99% of them. But they think he’s a one off evil. Rather than simply another talmudiacal monstrosity, like Merrick Garland and the Isr deep state. We need to connect the dots for them.

    • Agree: Lurker
  152. Trinity says:

    You have to be a sand nigger Jew. The Jew and Arab are only slightly above the negro. The sand niggers rank with southeast Asians and dot Indians/ Pakis. Mud people.

    Beethoven, Mozart, the Germans who put American on the moon, tons of German inventers, the Wright brothers had at least some German blood, German cars and ingenuity, etc, etc. DOMINATED the 1936 Olympics, Hitler had built a winner.

    Either you are a parasitic Jew sand nigger or an effeminate Englishman with bad teeth.


    • LOL: RedNordid1488
    • Replies: @Joe825
    , @RedNordid1488
  153. John1955 says:

    “I did some searches”

    Pray tell were these searches done with Google ? 😀

    “Controversy of Zion” is on archive org in a quite decent 400dpi

    • Replies: @Skeptikal
  154. John1955 says:

    “We shall meet in the place where there is no darkness”
    O’Brien to Winston and Julia
    “See y’all on Jan 6. It’s gonna be epic…”
    Donald Trump

    Fast forward to Midterms Red Wave which was not to be:

    The Chestnut Tree Cafe is a local dive bar filled with telescreens. When the cafe is first mentioned in the book, it is a place where out-of-favor Party Members and Criminals, accused of Thought Crimes, gathered.

    Winston, the main character, could always remember the only song played in the bar:

    “Under the Spreading Chestnut Tree
    I sold you and you sold me:
    There lie they, and here lie we
    Under the Spreading Chestnut Tree”

  155. @Michael Fury

    Converted Jews today are NOT Semites.

    So what’s with the “Anti-Semitism” label?

  156. @Richard B

    I have a hard copy of the book, thank the lord.

    • Replies: @Richard B
  157. Durruti says:

    The remnants of Trotsky‘s political movement was used for that purpose (of being “…a front used to round up trouble makers”?) – for decades after his death.

    Question from JM:

    What evidence do you have of this?

    A year of passing through one sect, Workers World, a small split from the (parent) Socialist Workers Party, personal knowledge of the Spartacist League, (another small split from the SWP – they had the best looking Girls in the movement). Leadership of a smaller sect (3 small chapters), Internationalist Newsletter, all claiming to be the best Trotskyists.

    We published articles, the Newsletter, and a small Book of analysis & Trotskyist documents, “Whirlwinds of Danger.” I am recalling the title from over half a century ago.

    Polish writer Isaac Deutscher authored a 3 volume History of Trotsky, “The Prophet Armed“, “The Prophet Unarmed“, and “The Prophet Outcast.” Deutscher was not popular with the Trotskyists, in that, while he greatly admired Trotsky, he did not always agree with the sects (who utilized the name/memory of Trotsky).

    I spoke to some of those who had made the acquaintance of Trotsky, while he resided in Mexico 1936-1940. I also observed various Marxist groups in Europe (Belgium & France). Being arrested in 2 countries was more fun than a learning experience.

    I plead guilty to THINKING, and observing and learning. I did not bore my students with this arcane (if somewhat important), History, just here & a few other forums, if the articles and commentaries are relevant.

    I have only my integrity and handsome features – to support some of my arguments. Our host, Ron Unz, will not print my articles. I have 1 published Book, “A History of the Puerto Rican Community, of Bethlehem PA: 1944-1993.” It had been my Dissertation at Lehigh U.!&&p=7911be963791a762JmltdHM9MTY2ODcyOTYwMCZpZ3VpZD0zZWY4NjMyNS0zZmY2LTY3NzEtMzY2ZC03MTQ1M2VhMDY2NDMmaW5zaWQ9NTE3Ng&ptn=3&hsh=3&fclid=3ef86325-3ff6-6771-366d-71453ea06643&psq=a+history+of+the+puerto+rican+community+in+Bethlehem+PA+1944-1993&u=a1aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuYW1hem9uLmNvbS9oaXN0b3J5LVB1ZXJ0by1SaWNhbi1jb21tdW5pdHktQmV0aGxlaGVtL2RwLzA5NjU5OTcxMDM&ntb=1

    I have been censored/Blacklisted in both the Mainstream and Alternate Media.

    A final note: Political groups that claim to be in opposition to the Powers that Be, often are covers/fronts for counter-insurgent – gathering and identifying the Opposition. The always marginal American ‘Communist’ (Stalinist) Party, Larger than the Trotskyist Sects, served the purpose of counter-insurgent, (acted as a police arm of the American Government) body, with a finely honed professionalism. The American ‘Communist’ Party worked with the American imperialist Government, and opposed Puerto Rican Independence, opposed the Cuban revolution of 1959, sent its cadre into the Democratic Party during WW II, and never left. Understand: the ‘so-called ‘Communists’ occupy the extreme Right of the Democrat Gang. They are the most anti-Russian, anti China, pro-War, supporters of occupied America’s current Police State.

    • Replies: @Arthur MacBride
    , @JM
  158. anarchyst says:
    @Commentator Mike

    Martin Luther recognized the perfidy of the jews, but later administrators of the various Protestant sects adopted many tenets of judaism. I still believe that the Roman Catholic Church was the last “holdout”…but finally succumbed to judaism with its “Vatican II Ecumenical Council”.
    The present “pope” is but a good example of the Roman Catholic Church going astray.
    Best regards,

  159. Ron Unz says:
    @Richard B

    Lastly, there’s the great Douglas Reed. And great is the right word. He was considered to be the most respected living journalist at the time and was certainly the highest paid.

    I happened to glance at this thread and noticed your remarkable claim. Reed had certainly been a fairly successful journalist and author during the 1930s and 1940s, but I’d never gotten the sense that he’d been more than that, even before his controversial views got him purged and blacklisted. Do you have a solid source for your information?

    • Replies: @Richard B
    , @Skeptikal
  160. anonymous[845] • Disclaimer says:

    In Britain, leftists have concealed and even collaborated with decades of organized rape and child-prostitution because the criminals are brown-skinned Muslims and their victims are White.

    Racist albinonigger vermin love to flog a dead horse (I fully expected this when I opened the essay). Let it go mofer. What you will get are minimal returns because everyone knows that such “brown-skinned Muslim” filth are but a minority.

    The “organized rape and child-prostitution… by Muslims” will never be more egregious than the ongoing “organized rape” of children by your pagan godless Chrizzie priests… ongoing for centuries now!!

    You lowlifes have been sacrificing your little ones for Zero spiritual gains (mangods-worship leads to Zero, Zilch, gains). Yours is a whoring society, after all. Sexual promiscuity and perversion pervades through the fabric of your evilisation.

    The issue quoted above can and will be controlled. I am sure the Muslim community itself will help with this. I most certainly hope they do.

    But, the innate disease in your godless society as reflected by the spiritual gatekeepers of your pagan temples, can never be brought under control. You know why? Because the whitevil society simply wishes to turn a blind eye to the spiritual rot within.

  161. anonymous[845] • Disclaimer says:
    @Jud Jackson

    he demolishes the Bible because of its numerous contradictions but still believes in a God that controls the universe

    Seems like this Paine fella may have been a crypto-Muslim, perhaps even without knowing it himself.

    Good for him, if so.

    • Replies: @emerging majority
  162. Richard B says:
    @Ron Unz

    Hello Ron, Thanks for your response.

    Do you have a solid source for your information?

    The source for his being the highest paid journalist is The Controversy of Zion itself.
    In it he discusses (I don’t recall the exact chapter) being confused and concerned that the response to his reporting started to become very negative indeed, even though he hadn’t changed the way he worked. A way that had earned him the respect of his peers.

    That he was the most respected journalist is an inference that I made from the response to his work prior to being purged. I believe it to be a valid inference. However, since it is inferred and not sourced, perhaps I should have worded it more carefully.
    Thanks for the heads up Ron.

    …his controversial views got him purged and blacklisted

    I would say that his views were only controversial in as much as they were true. And part of the justification for coming to that conclusion is your website in general and your essay on WWII in particular.

    In short, it wasn’t his views that got him purged and blacklisted, it was the powers that be. Or rather, to be more precise, the powers that were and are. And the fact that they still are is why there are no more Douglas Reed’s and why your website is so necessary and valuable.

    • Replies: @Ron Unz
  163. anonymous[251] • Disclaimer says:

    Thank you Mr. Langdon,

    That was excellent.

    IMO Orwell made the head thoughtcrime persectutor “O’Brian” and the face of the enemy “Goldstein ” to reference what Stalin had done in the Soviet Union to the J rival Bolshevik Trotsky.

    Joseph Stalin for all his terrible crimes did push away the ethnic J dominance of Communism/the Soviet Union and hunted down Trotsky the former German J9ish Communist intellectual Lev Bronstein, had him murdered in Mexico.

    Though Stalin did keep a few ethnic J henchmen around to terrorize, murder rivals, threats (Yagoda, was Levanti Beria ethnic J, he sure looked and acted that way), Stalin is basically seen as a non J*ish Slavic gangster and that’s one of the reason American J Communists lost their love, spying for the USSR and became the loathsome group “Neo Conservative Zionists”.

    It is astounding how far White hating ethnic Js, mostly not religious orthodox Js have ceased power in the USA in intelligence, foreign policy, immigration, mass media.

    Walt Disney and Ted Turner were the last two White Gentile, Anglo media owners I can remember who ever competed with the dominant ethnic J media mafia.

    The difference been CNN under “Liberal” White Southern Ted Turner and what happened after the merger with Gerald Levin’s Time Warner inc, Jeff Zucker – my God Wolf Blitzer” a former AIPAC lobbyist is supposedly a fair and neutral CNN commentator.

    What do do?

    J Ryan
    The Political Cesspool

  164. anonyms says:

    To all those lowlifes who replied to this post…

    Muslims are greater rapists by proportion… Mexicans are… Negroes are…. the white (trash) race is the best!!

    Proportion… Shproportion…

    If it was really so bad, it would have found itself streaming into the news feed (like Rotherham). Nobody could have stopped it. Like your Juden media (and everything else) overlords love the Muslim community enough to hide it? Yeah, right!

    You supremacist deceitful mofers are basically trying your best at projection, deflection and misdirection… among other depraved matters, to hide the main whitevil rapists in sheep’s clothing… your pagan priests, and their willing minions in habits (I am tired of pasting links, but you know it).

    All right, just one…

    How many such sexual depredations are outside the “proportion” argument?

    Fake narratives will gain you some brownie points in this clash of civilisations, but what of the rot in your godless temples?

    May the Almighty One never give the current lot of your kind, inner spiritual peace. Perhaps your descendents will have better luck. But, not y’all.

    Then, have you bastards also considered the irrefutable fact that albinoniggers are far greater psychopaths than other races. Wish to talk about proportions?

  165. @Durruti

    But your hero’s name wasn’t Trotsky, was it ?
    Why didn’t he use his real name, do you think ?

    With your long devotion to “Trotsky”, you must approve the Red Terror.
    Can you give an estimation of the number of dead ?

    He had also written, ”As for us, we were never concerned with the Kantian-priestly and vegetarian-Quaker prattle about the “sacredness of human life”. We were revolutionaries in opposition, and have remained revolutionaries in power. To make the individual sacred, we must destroy the social order which crucifies him. And that problem can only be solved by blood and iron. The man who recognizes the revolutionary historic importance of the very fact of the existence of the Soviet system must also sanction the Red Terror.›leon-trotsky/

    • Replies: @Arthur MacBride
    , @Durruti
  166. Richard B says:
    @Happy Tapir

    That’s great.

    I’d much rather have a hardback copy. But am grateful for the one we have here.

  167. @Arthur MacBride

    Perhaps, Durutti, you are also a fan of Hirsch Apfelbaum.
    But he also didn’t use his real name, either.
    He called himself Grigori Zinoviev.
    How do you account for this ?

    “To overcome our enemies we must have our own socialist militarism. We must carry along with us 90 million out of the 100 million of Soviet Russia’s population. As for the rest, we have nothing to say to them. They must be annihilated.” — Grigory Zinoviev (aka Hirsch Apfelbaum), 1918

    Previous link with quote by Bronstein.

    Exposing the Jewish Criminal – Leon Trotsky – Death of…›leon-trotsky/

    • Replies: @Arthur MacBride
  168. geokat62 says:

    “New Twitter policy is freedom of speech, but not freedom of reach.”

    This is a direct quote taken from ADL’s Jonathan Greenblatt, who has fondly used it several times in the recent past.

    Who’s your massa, Elon? That’s a good little Shabbos goy.

    • LOL: littlewing
    • Replies: @Skeptikal
  169. Durruti says:
    @Arthur MacBride

    But your hero’s name wasn’t Trotsky, was it ?
    Why didn’t he use his real name, do you think ?

    With your long devotion to “Trotsky”, you must approve the Red Terror.
    Can you give an estimation of the number of dead ?

    My “hero’s name” is Tyson Fury. I suppose you have an argument for that.

    Lev Bronstein was Trotsky’s WELL KNOWN and often used Family Name for Trotsky. Throughout his political career, his Birth Name was well known by all – except you. Trotsky, was one of the major leaders of the Petrograd (Russia’s Capital) Soviet-1905-(council) in an early political rising against the Russian Tsar, Nicholas II.

    As one of Russia’s most popular leaders, he used his birth name. After the Tsar and his government regained control of their capital, Trotsky was sentenced to prison. After his escape, and to better hide from the government, Lev Bronstein began to use the name of one of his jailers (Trotsky).!&&p=7b0fee1014d1d720JmltdHM9MTY2ODcyOTYwMCZpZ3VpZD0wMGQ4YzIxOC1mNmRjLTZlMWUtMmY0MS1kMDc4ZjczNTZmMmImaW5zaWQ9NTI2MQ&ptn=3&hsh=3&fclid=00d8c218-f6dc-6e1e-2f41-d078f7356f2b&psq=Trotsky%27s+jailer%27s+name&u=a1aHR0cHM6Ly90cm90c2t5YW5hLm5ldC9MZW9uX1Ryb3Rza3kvUHNldWRvbnltcy90cm90c2t5X3BzZXVkb255bXMuaHRtbA&ntb=1

    One of many informational links.

    If you think Trotsky was a fiery militant, you must read his “Their Morals and Ours.” He was EXTREMELY dogmatic, and that clouded his brilliance. I am mostly an admirer of Thomas Jefferson (heard of him?), who I have often discussed on this forum, and in my classes, John F. Kennedy, Mark Twain, Nestor Makhno, Buenaventura Durruti, Tom Paine, George Orwell, Ernest Hemingway, Eugene Debs, Che Guevara, Dennis Kucinich, Cynthia McKinney, Jesse Ventura, Joan Baez, (who I demonstrated with), Bobby Fischer, Martin Sostre, Pedro Albizu Campos, Lolita Lebron, Andres Figueroa Cordero, Julian Assange, and Ron Paul, among others.!&&p=158a22eb7c5636a3JmltdHM9MTY2ODcyOTYwMCZpZ3VpZD0wMGQ4YzIxOC1mNmRjLTZlMWUtMmY0MS1kMDc4ZjczNTZmMmImaW5zaWQ9NTE5Mg&ptn=3&hsh=3&fclid=00d8c218-f6dc-6e1e-2f41-d078f7356f2b&psq=their+morals+and+ours+trotsky&u=a1aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuYW1hem9uLmNvbS9UaGVpci1Nb3JhbHMtT3Vycy1MZW9uLVRyb3Rza3kvZHAvMDg3MzQ4MzE5Nw&ntb=1

    I oppose Zionist Imperialist Terror, and terror of any color.

    I like those who fight for The Republic! I prefer an electoral political culture (as chaotic as it often is), to Dictatorship. An active and educated citizenry can periodically clean our political house and keep elections honest (mostly).

    Dr. Peter J. Antonsen – nom de guerre, Durruti

    *Now, you can send my name to the thought police!

    • Replies: @Arthur MacBride
  170. @Arthur MacBride

    JFYI. Brief History of Bronstein, “Parvus” et al, the Zionist Socialist Workers Party, and how the “Russian” revolution/s were funded and organised.
    Incl the banker funded Japanese attack on Russia.

    The false flag of “Bloody Sunday”, how tsar Nicholas II was fooled, gave personal recompence to victims, even received a “communist” delegation in good faith. This Jewish tactic recently adapted/reused in Kiev’s Maidan.

    Re question on Bronstein’s Red Terror to Durruti: about 40 million victims.

    As Swedish Jew Soloman Schulman said

    “Few today think of the Jews’ important role, both ideologically and practically, under the pioneering period of the socialist movements.”

    (Dagens Nyheter, April 12, 1990, B 3.)


  171. I have often imagined how Garland would have played a perfect role in Soviet Russia as a top guy in the NKVD as a Jewish Commissar signing execution warrants.

  172. @Happy Tapir

    If they(you?) want their culture vibrant, they’d be happier in Yangon, Mumbai, or Ouagadougou.

    Be honest. They(you?) moved to white countries to enjoy a level of prosperity their(your?) own people could never have created.

  173. Druid55 says:

    There are some moslems who have committed rape. To generalise the way you do is disgusting. Look at the statistics in the USA., South Africa, India, etc. rape is everywhere. Serbs did it big time during their war on bosnia, etc. rethink

  174. @Durruti

    Your obfuscation tries to divert that you are even today an admirer of the Jewish mass murderer L. D. Bronstein.
    You even characterise him as “one of Russia’s most popular leaders”.

    Ah yes, those halcyon days of the Cheka.
    They even published their own body count.
    In 1918 – 1919 it was 1,7 million Russians.
    Just a start for good old LDB and his masonic b’nai b’rith comrades.
    Your Spanish nun-rapers not in the same league, eh ?

    Did you inform your students of these facts, Professor ?

    You didn’t answer the previous question, obviously preferring bullshit about Thos Paine to questions about your pin-up and Red Terror.

    A. Not definite. Most reliable sources give +/- 40 million victims.
    About 35% roughly speaking of the total population.
    Of course that’s only in Russia.

    Did you inform your students accordingly, Professor ?

    Did you carry a volume of Antonio Gramsci, wear a Che t-shirt to class ?
    Part of the problem not of the solution, it looks like, Professor.

  175. JPS says:

    It wasn’t for minimal wages that people came here. The wages were pretty good compared to Europe. America’s peak wasn’t in the post-war, America has never truly recovered from the Great Depression. There had never been a place in the world as well off as the corn belt in those days. The social, cultural, economic ruins of America are also a place of cultural amnesia, the reason the Left exists, so we forget just how much they and their Jewish masters have worked to ruin us.

  176. Joe825 says:

    Ethnically I’m mostly English and German. Personality-wise I’m definitely majority English. No jewish ancestry at all. There are smart Germans for sure. The problem is they’re so stupid as a group. What caused that? Were they better off after supporting Hitler? Why do they think Merkel is a good idea?

  177. Anonymous[260] • Disclaimer says:

    I did a “Find on page” search for “McConnell,” who ensured Garfinkel’s confirmation in words to the effect that, yes, Garfinkel might be toward the left, but his beliefs are well within the mainstream of American legal thought. I found nothing despite Garfinkel owing his confirmation to McConnell.

    Obviously then, what needs a fair and thorough airing is McConnell’s past. Specifically his dismissal from the Army in 1968 within weeks of his signing up. He says it was for bad eyes despite having had to have just passed a rigorous eye exam to be accepted. And then his discharge records were conveniently disappeared, which, given the time it happened at Army records headquarters, is more frightening than whatever Mitch may have bee doing to get thrown out of the Army at a time anyone who could mist a mirror was being sent to Vietnam.

    Are we all children? Do the photos of Mitch when he was young with his commie, leftist, lesbian first wife mean nothing? His second wife is the heiress to a Chinese shipping fortune apparently based on putting Chinese slave laborers on board Jewish-owned cargo vessels. If my suspicions are wrong, I apologize, but the fact that this fellow is still the leader of the Republican Party suggests it is as effectively bought and paid for by the Jews as the Democrats.

  178. JM says:
    @Pat Hannagan

    This is thick on loud-mouthed assertions and thin on evidence. No wonder the site from which it comes is so marginal in readership as evidenced by the lack of volume and currency of the “contributions”.

  179. @Trinity

    Cringe, if Germans are the “superior race” why they got domesticated by the Jews LMAO?. The Jews are the only race whom objectively we can call superior. They maintained their genetic heritage and their culture intact for thousands of years. When Germans came to America they lost their language, their culture and became assimilated in less than one century.

  180. Skeptikal says:

    Yes, I found a pdf of the book via Google.


    But I thought the book was archived at TUR.

    But a search of the site did not find it.

    Anyhow I ordered it from Amazon.

    • Replies: @John1955
  181. Skeptikal says:
    @Ron Unz

    Reed certainly seems to have been at the very least a very successful establishment journalist and a successful and prolific writer.
    The blurb that precedes the pdf of The Controversy of Zion here


    “Douglas Reed, who described himself as relatively unschooled , started out
    in life as an office boy at the age of 13 and was a bank clerk at 19 before enlisting at the outbreak of World War I. A less promising preparation for a man destined to be one of the most brilliant political analysts and descriptive writers of the century could hardly be imagined. He was already 26 years old when he reached the London Times in 1921 as a telephonist and clerk; and he was 30 when he finally reached journalism as sub-editor. Thereafter there was no stopping this late-starter. Three years later he became assistant Times correspondent in Berlin before moving on to Vienna as Chief Central European correspondent stationed at Vienna. Reed broke with The Times in October 1938, almost simultaneously with the appearance of a book which was to win him instant world fame “Insanity Fair,” a charming combination of autobiography and contemporary history. This was followed a year later by another runaway best-seller, Disgrace Abounding. . . . .” and so forth.

    Quite interesting.

    • Replies: @Richard B
  182. Ron Unz says:
    @Richard B

    The source for his being the highest paid journalist is The Controversy of Zion itself.

    I read that book a year or two ago, and I don’t recall him making that statement, but perhaps he did. Here’s the HTML version for anyone interested in checking:

    However, I digitized the archives of most of America’s leading publications of the last 150 years, and there are only minimal references to him or his books. Several of the latter from the 1930s were favorably reviewed, and one or two of his later ones were discussed as well, though usually with mixed or negative appraisals.

    But I really think it’s a wild exaggeration to claim that he was ever the world’s most respected or highest-paid journalist.

    People have a natural tendency to massively inflate the stature of someone who writes something controversial that they happen to agree with, but I think they should try to resist it.

    • Agree: Renard
    • Thanks: Happy Tapir
  183. Skeptikal says:

    “freedom of speech, but not freedom of reach.”

    What does that even mean?

    What is freedom of reach?

    • Replies: @geokat62
  184. JM says:
    @Joe Levantine

    In old Catholic England, you never had to walk more than six miles in any direction to find a Catholic precinct that would give free shelter. When the English aristocracy rebelled against Catholicism, their uprising was never based on ideology, the way it happened in Martin Luther’s Germany, but was the product of greed that sought to confiscate the vast Catholic Church’s properties, which they eventually did. From then on, England morphed into a two tier society were the landed gentry led a parasitical life while the lower masses toiled in a state of total exploitation. ( paraphrasing Dr. E. Michael Jones).

    Paraphrasing a secondary source (who paraphrases – mainly one secondary source – William Cobbett’s A History of the Protestant Reformation) is poor history.

    Have you ever focused your mind on the fact that the Catholic Church directly owned large tracts of land, not just in England, but all over Western Europe (1/3 of the lands in Southern Europe) and has lost nearly all of it, with or without any Protestant Reformation? The common element in all of this wasn’t “Protestant theft”, but consumption of the fruits of the land by the production of commodities from it which was later eclipsed by the production of a vast production of commodities in factories.
    Associated with the trend toward commodity production (the essence of Capitalism) was an enormous development in technology and science in all spheres, all mainly associated with Protestant countries. The ultimate effect of this was the raising of the material and social status of the masses – and the process continues to this day.

    Today not a small quantity of this new kind of wealth is owned by the Catholic Church. Google “Catholic church firms and shareholdings owned” and my assertion will be richly confirmed. In other words, they are richer than ever, only now, Capitalist rich. They are an institution deeply immersed in Capitalism. And they behave accordingly. That’s why Dirty Frank is a symbolic foot-washer. The money trail from the trade in fake refugees runs into the coffers of the Catholic Church all over the West.

    I would venture and speculate, that rich English aristocrats sought loans from Jews against their ill gotten properties, mortgaging their lands and losing them to usurious Jewish practices. Hence the rise of Jewish power and the decline of the WASP.

    The first part of this isn’t a speculation, but is well documented. Scholarly volumes have been written on the subject. The second part is naive because Jewish economic power is far greater in scope than simply land; it’s mercantile, banking, manufacturing, agribusiness.

    But the Jewish-WASP alliance would always be United by its rabidly anti Catholic drive and that could explain the visceral hatred that Orwell had to Catholicism.

    This is a paranoid nonsense. Any contemporary Jewish-WASP alliance has the same basis as the alliance between Roman Catholics (and the Roman Catholic Church) and Jews: economic convenience, tailored to the modern cosmopolitan world. The Jews being shaped by a very long history to be arch cosmopolitans. Even Stalin called then ‘Rootless Cosmopolitans’.

    • Replies: @Joe Levantine
  185. JM says:
    @Ron Unz

    He was a significant journalist at the London Times. That probably wasn’t very well paid at the time.

    • Replies: @Z-man
  186. @TheInitiate

    This amalgamation of Yahweh and Jehovah worshippers, engineered by the Roman Emperor Constantine and metastasized by the likes of Theodosian and Augustine of Hippo is properly described as the JudieChristie MagickMindfuck.

    Adherents among those whose roots are Western European have long been deracinated and thus deprived of their tribal roots. Those tribal roots were both respectful of the natural world and in many ways realizing they were a part of it (rather than apart from it as per Dominationist ideology) and at the same time aware of a cosmic reality greater than what mere religiosity offers…particularly that deracinating JudieChristieMagickMindfuck.

    Quite literally those folks were mindfucked by the imposed religion and deprived of their magical relationship with Mother Earth and Cosmic Consciousness.

  187. John1955 says:

    “But a search of the site did not find it.”

    Search on a specific site looks like that:
    domain name colon search term (without gaps)

    ((( of zion)))


    There are 4 results for this particular search. Much faster than casting fishing nets over the whole WWW 😁

    • Replies: @JM
  188. Z-man says:

    He made his money and gained international fame from his books, starting with Insanity Fair, 1938.
    He then spoke Truth to Power and was thus purged and blacklisted including by his former employer The Times of London, not to be confused with The New York Times. 😉😉

  189. @anonymous

    If Thomas Paine was a “crypto-Muslim” he could only have been a Sufi, never a Sunni and only very unlikely a Shia.

  190. Richard B says:
    @Ron Unz

    But I really think it’s a wild exaggeration to claim that he was ever the world’s most respected or highest-paid journalist.

    Though I wouldn’t call it a wild exaggeration, you’re right, I should have been more careful in the way I put it. But the part about him being the highest-paid journalist at the time, that was from the book (and he was be no means bragging).

    I’m on my second reading of it now. When I come across the passage in question I’ll be happy to share it with you.

    People have a natural tendency to massively inflate the stature of someone who writes something controversial that they happen to agree with, but I think they should try to resist it.

    Fair enough. I do agree it’s best to resist it. Hence my Thanks for the heads up, in my previous comment.

    • Replies: @Richard B
  191. @RedNordid1488

    Superiority is not determined by evanescent racial/tribal success against others who are relatively innocent of their designs on total domination and control. Rather, it is a matter of merit and beneficence along with creativity of the types which inspires and elevates.

  192. @Ron Unz

    What’s your opinion of the SBF FTX scandal?

  193. JM says:

    You haven’t given any evidence worthy of the name, to answer my simple question arising from your above assertion. There have been claims.

    I would have thought that the main role of the Communist Party USA was (after a brief lapse) as an ardent supporter of the War (‘WW II’). It was always Zionist (e.g. see WZ Foster’s History of the CPUSA). The above mentioned Spartacist League became very Zionist. The SWP – formally – wasn’t. In fact it was the residue of the 1939 split with the nascent Zionists, the latter group being part of the stable from which “War Credits for Ukraine”, (((Bernie Sanders))), arose. All had a huge disproportion of Jews as members, supporters and leaders.

  194. In the real twenty-first century, Western intelligence-agencies and web-companies are doing their best to bring Orwell’s dystopian visions of omni-surveillance to life. And Jews have always been at the center of this spying, as a recent investigation by independent media has once again confirmed:

    “A MintPress study has found that hundreds of former agents of the notorious Israeli spying organization, Unit 8200, have attained positions of influence in many of the world’s biggest tech companies, including Google, Facebook, Microsoft and Amazon.”

    Throughout history the host peoples have never failed to notice one specific trait common to this particular group of outsiders: the Jew is nosey.

    It readily becomes apparent that “a Jew at every bottleneck” is (((their))) tactic for self-enrichment and ultimately subversion and control.

    Then once (((they))) become dominant (((they))) they systematically design / streamline economic and social systems with just the right number of choke points so (((they))) can man them all (((themselves))) for total infallible control.

    The brilliant true American podcaster Dr. Patrick Slattery,,

    has been saying since Second Quarter 2020 that the Jew Flu Hoax was rolled out to accomplish three main goals:

    short term as an excuse to mainstream massive mail-in-ballots voting facilitating fraud to unseat President Trump in the “Jew d’etat” against the man who Jews promoted relentlessly as a celebrity but instantly identified as their mortal enemy the minute he came out of the elevator to announce his Presidential candidacy by saying “build the wall” to secure the borders, thereby diametrically opposing what Kevin MacDonald in Culture of Critique (1997)
    identified as the Jews’ main legislative initiative for USA since first getting a Jew elected to the US House from NYC about 1890;

    mid-range to inflict the vaxxx mandate on the world population not just to cull the herd but to exponentially grow Jew wealth by gaining as collateral the natural resources of the nations who could only afford the vaccine for their populations by pledging such a transfer; and

    long term instillation of the hardware for effectuating the (((cyber police state))) including elimination of cash so the nosey few have remote control over every individual’s ability worldwide to move and eat.

  195. JM says:

    Better to use a search engine:

    Say ‘douglas reed controversy free pdf’

    This is just one…

    click ‘pdf’ and when loaded, download it.

    • Replies: @John1955
  196. geokat62 says:

    What is freedom of reach?

    You have freedom to say whatever you like as long as it’s limited to a few listeners.

    Any truth telling about the nefarious activities of Jewish Supremacy that reaches beyond a few listeners is strictly forbidden.

    This is the ADL’s official position on hate speech limits placed on the 1st A… and Elon Musk has just endorsed it.

    Welcome to the USSA, goy!

    • Replies: @geokat62
  197. Richard B says:

    Thanks for posting that blurb. Very interesting indeed.

    He was a great man. A great man who told the truth about Jewish Supremacy Inc.
    That’s why they silenced him. Because JSI hates truth and greatness, for a reason.
    There’s nothing truthful or great about it.
    That’s why, given their control of what passes for journalism today, the Douglas Reeds have been replaced by obedient hacks and shills.
    Journalism. Another thing they destroyed.

  198. Richard B says:
    @Richard B

    People have a natural tendency to massively inflate the stature of someone who writes something controversial that they happen to agree with, but I think they should try to resist it.

    I did want to add that, beyond what I think of him, his stature speaks for itself.

    Personally, I don’t value Reed as a writer, or admire him as a man, because he wrote something controversial that I happen to agree with, but because he spoke the truth about a tyrannical and hostile elite with a long history of predatory and parasitic race and religious hatred, that throughout history has led to the death and destruction of anything and anyone they see as an obstacle to their obnoxious lust for power. The fact that they’re still at it speaks to the continued relevance of his book.

    How could one not admire him?

    Lastly, it’s worth pointing out that people also have a natural tendency to drastically underestimate the stature of someone who writes something truthful that they don’t like. Unfortunately, however, those who do that are unlikely to ever admit it. And now we’re back to the value of Reed’s work and why I’m grateful to you for making it available here. Because that’s the kind of people he directs attention to in his book.

    • Replies: @JWalters
  199. Dude660 says:

    1984 really is a book arguing that communism was good, but Stalin was doing communism the wrong way.

    1984 argues that communist Jews like Trotsky had the right vision of communism, and that Gentile communists like Stalin were doing things wrong. Of course the book is pro-Jewish.

  200. John1955 says:

    The name of applied search science is “Regular expression”

    So, instead of arguing which is better for the carpenter – hammer or hacksaw (both are useful) – let’s climb on the Shoulders of Giants and see more, understand better ☺️

    I did not climb very high though, only read the book “Advanced Search with Google”

    • LOL: JM
  201. JackieG says:

    The UK’s Jewish problem began with the 1066 Norman Invasion where Jews were brought to the island for the first time.
    By 1215 the Jews were rebuked in the Great Charter (Magna Carta)

    • Agree: Arthur MacBride
    • Thanks: RedNordid1488
  202. Joe825 says:

    They’re superior at being parasites for a long time. It’s not admirable. Maintaining “genetic heritage” is something a gerbil might be impressed with.

  203. Trinity says:

    The Jews are not a race dum dum. IMO, even IF the Bible were real ( sometimes I really question if it is real or more Jew mental disorder psycho babble), the Jews of the Bible went the way of the Aztecs long ago.

    Jews? Superior? How so? The people who claim they are Jews are not physically gifted at all and the Ashkenazi high IQ thing is just horseshit. Whites invented just about everything, from planes, trains to automobiles, electricity, refrigeration, plumbing, television, radio, on and on………

    The people who claim to be Jews are little more than sand nigras just like Arabs. The sooner people find out the truth the better.

    The average Ashkenazi looks like an Eastern European Turkish mutt. Glorified gypsy. The European Jesus looks more Middle Eastern than the average Ashkenazi. This has to be a joke.

    • Replies: @RedNordid1488
  204. Trinity says:

    IF the Bible is real, it doesn’t end well for MOST Jews according to scripture. Admittedly, I know very, very little about the Bible but I have heard or read those who do know “The Book” claim the Anti Christ will be a Jew who will deceive Israel. The Mother of all Deceivers will be turning the tables on the “wage war by deception” people. Now why would a Holy God’s “chosen people” want to deceive others???? My, my, my….. Stay tuned, friends.

    • Replies: @RedNordid1488
  205. geokat62 says:

    Gab comment posted by Real Six Million:

    Freedom of speech is freedom of reach.

    The entire premise of freedom of speech is to allow all ideas into the conversation and reject or embrace them on merit individually, organically.

    What Musk and Greenblatt are doing is anti-free speech.

    They don’t want us quiet because we lie, and they don’t want us quiet because our ideas are unpopular.

    They want us quiet because we’re right and the truth will literally destroy them.

  206. geokat62 says:

    • Replies: @Al Liguori
    , @Richard B
  207. remo says:

    It has long been my understanding ORWELL knew exactly what he was doing making GOLDSTEIN the hidden hand; by virtue of the whole book being about REVERSAL of meaning.

    Black is white.
    War is peace.
    Truth is Lie
    The leader of the resistance
    is the leader of the tyranny.

    To make us understand the nuance and power of this methodology and truth, he had us read the whole thing through before realising just how hidden it is.
    (By way of deception; Thou Shalt wage WAR)

    • Replies: @dude6600
  208. Druid55 says:

    Like the jews said (Golds Meier) : we will never forgive the Palestinians for forcing us to kill them

    • LOL: Trinity
  209. Al Liguori says: • Website
    @Haxo Angmark

    I am doing my part to preserve and spread Reed’s The Controversy of Zion: • Many similar resources here:

    • Agree: Richard B
  210. Al Liguori says: • Website

    NOBODY obtains such visibility without being compromised by the Jews.

    • Agree: Druid55
    • LOL: Richard B
  211. @Ron Unz

    Douglas became unfavored, if he was every wildly favored, I have no idea. But his diminished status is nothing more than common sense. While reporting on the war he was pro National Socialist and pro Hitler. He was a British subject, and the British people and government hated both Hitler and National Socialism. End of story. Thusly Douglas became out of favor. I write this because he was not silenced by the Jews. People on UR love to over complicate a historian’s demise like Irving’s which besides Holocaust denial, much of his historical writing’s sources were proven unreliable, lies, or gross misrepresentations. This reported by many non Jewish historians. Douglas became a racists, and an idiot.
    The book all of you Jew haters love so much “The controversies of Zion”, which is all based on the Khazar theory, widely popular on UR to prove that Jews are not Jews, has been disproven definitively by DNA, Ashkenazi Jews are not Khazars, their DNA is from the ME mixed with Italian.

    Ron why you don’t just come clean with the fact that the Khazar theory is dead wrong. Been proven dead wrong even by the Jewish writer who also wrote about it Shlomo Sand. It is a theory now used in by the Black Hebrews, you know they are the real Chosen Jews, the Ashkenazi Jews are Kahzars that stole their religion. I mean some of this stuff is just rehashed garbage.

    From Wiki, I only post this because it happens to be the UR top 10 list of J conspiracies.

    The Khazar hypothesis of Ashkenazi ancestry, often called the Khazar myth by its critics,[1]: 369 [2]: VIII [3] is a largely abandoned historical hypothesis. The hypothesis postulated that Ashkenazi Jews were primarily, or to a large extent, descended from Khazars, a multi-ethnic conglomerate of mostly Turkic peoples who formed a semi-nomadic khanate in and around the northern and central Caucasus and the Pontic–Caspian steppe. The hypothesis also postulated that after collapse of the Khazar empire, the Khazars fled to Eastern Europe and made up a large part of the Jews there.[4] The hypothesis draws on some medieval sources such as the Khazar Correspondence, according to which at some point in the 8th–9th centuries, a small number of Khazars were said by Judah Halevi and Abraham ibn Daud to have converted to Rabbinic Judaism.[5] The scope of the conversion within the Khazar Khanate remains uncertain, but the evidence used to tie the Ashkenazi communities to the Khazars is meager and subject to conflicting interpretations.[6][7][8][9]

    Genetic studies on Jews have found no substantive evidence of a Khazar origin among Ashkenazi Jews. Doron Behar and other geneticists have concluded that such a link is unlikely, noting that it is difficult to test the Khazar hypothesis using genetics because there is lack of clear modern descendants of the Khazars that could provide a clear test of the contribution to Ashkenazi Jewish ancestry, but found no genetic markers in Ashkenazi Jews that would link them to peoples of the Caucasus/Khazar area.[8] This and other studies have instead found evidence that the Ashkenazi have mixed Near Eastern and Southern European/Mediterranean origins.[10][8][11]

    Although the majority of contemporary geneticists who have published on the topic dismiss it, one still finds occasional defenders of its plausibility. In the late 19th century, Ernest Renan and other scholars speculated that the Ashkenazi Jews of Europe originated among Turkic refugees who had migrated from the collapsed Khazarian Khanate westward into Europe, and exchanged their native Khazar language for Yiddish while continuing to practice Judaism. Though intermittently evoked by several scholars since that time, the Khazar-Ashkenazi hypothesis came to the attention of a much wider public with the publication of Arthur Koestler’s The Thirteenth Tribe in 1976.[12][4] It has been revived recently by geneticist Eran Elhaik, who in 2012 conducted a study aiming to vindicate it.[13]

    The hypothesis has been abused at times by anti-Zionists to challenge the idea that Jews have ties to ancient Israel, and it has also played some role in antisemitic theories propounded by fringe groups of American racists, Russian nationalists and the Christian identity movement. The term “Khazarian Mafia” sometimes is used by anti-semitic media as a derogatory term for Jews, especially in connection with conspiracy theories such as 9/11.

    • Replies: @Trinity
  212. geokat62 says:

    • Agree: Druid55
  213. JWalters says:
    @Richard B

    I agree on your assessment of Reed’s book.

    To me The Controversy of Zion is a great book because it combines (1) the investigative skills of a top foreign correspondent for the London Times, who traveled freely in Europe in the era encompassing WWII, and who met personally with many of the principal figures, and (2) a very deep, professional research dive into the voluminous facts which point to a Jewish supremacist conspiracy to control Europe, America, and Palestine (and possibly the world).

    It is a huge piece of research, professionally done, and focused on a topic virtually all professionals refuse to touch for fear of retribution. It goes to the root of many of the West’s major problems, especially involving war, and is, as you say, still centrally relevant today.

    The only similar work of which I am aware is Laurent Guyenot’s
    From Yahweh to Zion

    It is similar in focus and scope, and includes historical events that developed after the publication of Reed’s book.

    Another related, massive piece of research (by an anonymous author or authors) is
    When Victims Rule

    Some of Ron Unz’s articles valuably point readers in the same direction, notably:

    the section titled “The Central Jewish Role in Orchestrating World War II” in his article
    American Pravda: Understanding World War II

    American Pravda: Holocaust Denial – Analyzing the History of a Controversial Movement

    American Pravda: Oddities of the Jewish Religion

    I also agree on the extraordinary value of The Unz Review website, even though I strongly disagree with some of the views expressed.

    • Replies: @Richard B
  214. Richard B says:
    @Al Liguori

    Just for the record, the LOL is for the quote, not the commenter.

    It was a toss up between THANkS for posting that one so we could have more evidence, if more were needed, of what a pretentious and creepy sack of shit JBP is, or LOL. Had to go with LOL. He’s exactly the kind of intellectual the hostile elite want to shove down the public’s throat. He’s as useless as a box of wet matches.

  215. Richard B says:

    The fatal thing about celebrity intellectuals like Jordan Peterson is that their mediocre minds are extolled as great by credulous dumb shits devoid of judgment.

  216. @Richard B

    Kinda like you. Dumb ass supreme.

    • Troll: Richard B
    • Replies: @geokat62
  217. Many, many USians provoke a gag response

  218. Richard B says:

    Great comment! Couldn’t agree more. And thanks for the links.

  219. geokat62 says:
    @Fran taubman

    Kinda like you. Dumb ass supreme.

    Welcome back, Queen Esther.

    You’re right, of course. The goyim are dumb for trying to notice patterns. This is obviously a virulently anti-Semitic activity.

    Re Jordan Peterstein, they say a picture is worth a thousand words…

    How many shekels did Bibi agree to deposit into his bank account for his efforts to continue to dupe the dumb goyim? Any idea, Frannie?

    • Thanks: Kolya Krassotkin
    • Replies: @Gary Sudder
  220. Trinity says:
    @Fran Taubman

    So what you are saying is that Ashkenazi Jews are gypsy mutts. Snap, how about the Sephardic mutts? Wonder how many Jews in Israel are 100 % Jewish. Do the Jews of the Bible even exist today?

    I definitely can see the Italian thing. Joy Behar looks like a Jew hag but claims she is Italian. Richard Lewis and All Pacino. Both groups historically have engaged in organized crime. I have brought this up before.

    However, explain someone like Kirk Douglas? Doesn’t have the swarthy look of a southern Italian there. Either/or, these Jews do not resemble their sand nigra cousins, the Arabs. WHY is that? Ukrainians look like Russians, Austrians look like Germans, Koreans RESEMBLE Chinese. I call bullshit on these peoples claims of being from the Middle East.

    The designer mutt breed I am noticing a great deal today are spic/Jew amalgamations. Looks like I qualify as a Jew. I have a pretty good size bald spot so I could use that funny little hat. I will put a propeller on mine.

  221. The designer mutt breed I am noticing a great deal today are spic/Jew amalgamations. Looks like I qualify as a Jew. I have a pretty good size bald spot so I could use that funny little hat. I will put a propeller on mine.

    Sorry you are too stupid to qualify as a Jew. You qualify as a gofer. I have never quite seen anyone with more stupid posts then you, and that is saying a lot, as commenters and writers (who are just as worthless) publish the same conspiracy over and over again, starting with the Khazars. Like if they say it enough it will be come true, and we will be arrested and deported as fake Jews.

    The entire saga especially on UR is hilarious. Jew d Jew, Ju, Ju, . Plotting world take over as we speak.

    • Replies: @Trinity
  222. Trinity says:
    @Fran Taubman

    I am also too good looking to be a Jew. lol 😚. Not being nasty just being honest. Also I have compassion for others, and I am far too brutally honest to be associated with your ilk. I would stick out like a rose in a pile of shit in your neck of the woods. hehe.

  223. @Al Liguori

    Peterson is a putz who would benefit from testosterone replacement theory.

  224. @JM

    “ Today not a small quantity of this new kind of wealth is owned by the Catholic Church. ”

    While I am no fan of the Catholic Church which embraced banking after she was the avowed enemy of usury for the first fifteen centuries of her existence, I would still credit the Catholic Church with some positive social contributions. In my country of origin, the Catholic Church owns no less than 20% of the total real estate, some of which prime real estate, but she has a wide network of schools and hospitals that help many dispossessed people get an education or medical treatment that the state fails to provide. OTOH, the old kleptocracy, just like the British aristocracy, never gave any aid to the common person beyond what is in their political and money interests.

    “ The second part is naive because Jewish economic power is far greater in scope than simply land; it’s mercantile, banking, manufacturing, agribusiness.”

    Agree that this is the case today tracing back the trend to the start of the industrial revolution. Still the decline of the British WASP elites is largely the result of leading laidback lives with too many servants and relatively little industrial or agricultural workers.

    “ This is a paranoid nonsense. Any contemporary Jewish-WASP alliance has the same basis as the alliance between Roman Catholics (and the Roman Catholic Church) and Jews: economic convenience, tailored to the modern cosmopolitan world. The Jews being shaped by a very long history to be arch cosmopolitans. Even Stalin called then ‘Rootless Cosmopolitans’.”


    Thank you for raising many powerful points in this post that are worthy of serious research.

  225. @Richard B

    He is the stupid person’s idea of a clever person.

    • Agree: Gary Sudder
  226. He caters to dumber than stale dog feces anglo saxons-WASPs looking for answers. With a soft canadian effeminate voice, panders to pseudo intellectuals like those monetized clowns on fallopian tube; with hands over mouth, open jaw smiles, surprise looks, hear me roar womyn, soy boys, cucks, corporate simps stating things to garner money from imbeciles by stating flatulent opinions without evidence based arguments.

  227. @HammerJack

    Wow. He’s “Irish?”….LOL.

    Maybe move to Southie (South Boston) and dance an Irish gig? Have a pint and grab some cabbage at O’Malley’s Pub mr “o’brien”–next listen to the Boston Pimps blast out some Irish day music to all the geriatric club at the hall

  228. @geokat62

    Bibi is a USian too. Dual citizenshit thing–like the indians PM in britshit, and vander lying in germany land. all USians.

  229. dude6600 says:

    Orwell was really a Commie himself. He just was in line with the Jewish commies from a generation earlier like Lenin and Trotsky rather than the Gentile commies that had taken over the USSR by the time he wrote his books.

    Some people talk about how 1984 and Animal Farm seem like models the NWO is using? Yeah, that’s actually exactly how Orwell intended his books to be used.

  230. @Trinity

    “The average Ashkenazi looks like an Eastern European Turkish mutt. Glorified gypsy.”

    And yet still these “glorified gypsies” control the whole world. How can the whites be called a superior race if a supposedly “inferior” race controls them?. The Jews fight for what they believe, the whites fight for what they are told to do.

    I don’t believe the Bible, but it’s influence is so big to say it doesn’t exist.

  231. @Trinity

    Poor little innocent Christian. Imagine quoting the Bible that the same Jews created. When the Jews talk about “Satan being dethroned from the kingdom of God” they actually mean that Satan (The Goyim God) will be dethroned, since Satan in Hebrew means adversary, and who’s the adversary of the Jews? The non Jews.

    Can’t believe the goys still falls for the christian psy-op. Europe was way better when it was pagan. But this just proves my other comment, the whites fight for what they are told to do.

  232. @Trinity

    You must mean you’re a classical liberal, one of the best possible banners for anybody to work and live under.

  233. Hibernian says:

    ..they would talk among themselves in Hebrew and then speak English

    More likely Yiddish, unless they were Israeli immigrants.

  234. @Franz

    Paine was a born revolutionary. It’s a personality. What ideology it takes on is yet to be determined. Paine battled Burke over the Revolution in France, and it was Burke, who supported the American Revolution, that won over every class in England, and likely George Washington too.

Current Commenter

Leave a Reply -

 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Tobias Langdon Comments via RSS