The Unz Review: An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 Andrew Joyce Archive
On Jews and Plagues
Adventures in Jewish Historiography
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

“The libel that Jews were continually plotting to poison the world had particularly tragic results during the Black Death of 1348–49.
Dennis Prager & Joseph Telushkin Why the Jews? The Reason for Antisemitism[1]Prager, D. & Telushkin, J, Why the Jews? The Reason for Antisemitism (New York: Simon & Schuster, 2003), 85.

“There is no direct link between the massacres and the plague.”
Iris Ritzmann, “The Black Death as a cause of the massacres of Jews: A Myth of Medical History?”[2]Ritzmann I. [The Black Death as a cause of the massacres of Jews: A Myth of Medical History?] Medizin, Gesellschaft, und Geschichte : Jahrbuch des Instituts fur Geschichte der Medizin der Robert Bosch Stiftung. 1998 ;17:101-130.

I’ve been fascinated in recent days by Jewish commentary on COVID-19, which ranges from paranoid conspiracy theories about white nationalists to blunt admissions of intense Jewish ethnocentrism. In the first instance, the FBI’s apparently permanent and unironic surveillance of teenage chat sites has resulted in a stern but ludicrous warning that “extreme right-wing groups in the US are telling their members to deliberately spread the deadly new coronavirus to police officers and Jewish people.” Aside from conjuring mental images of ultra-orthodox Jews being chased by coughing skinheads, the ADL has taken to shaking its begging bowl in regards to rumors that Jews created the novel coronavirus in order to sell vaccines and “take advantage of the markets collapse through insider trading.” This petri dish of paranoia coexists with awkward Jewish discussions of the fact that Jewish communities are ideal incubators of disease because, in the words of The Forward, “the density of Jewish social networks across all denominations is almost twice as thick as that of the average American.” Less than a year after New York’s orthodox Jewish communities became epicenters for a resurgence of measles, concerns are already growing that the same communities are going to be a devil’s playground for COVID-19, which has already claimed the lives of two ultra-orthodox Jews in London.

Both inspired and disgusted by this mixture of contemporary disease and paranoia, I thought I’d revisit some historiographical material I prepared several years ago that concerns the same themes. The following essay concerns the putative allegation that Jews caused the Black Death, Jewish apologetic narratives in historiography, and the broader role of myth in Jewish self-understanding.

Accusations of Accusations

Anyone confronting mainstream Jewish historiography for the first time is overwhelmed by the victim paradigm inherent in most scholarship, a key part of which is the idea that Jews have been irrationally scapegoated countless times over many centuries. I’ve previously described the victim paradigm:

Jewish historiography is saturated with allusions to the “unique” status of Jews, who have suffered a “unique” hatred at the hands of successive generations of Europeans. In essence, it is the notion that Jews stand alone in the world as the quintessential “blameless victim.” To allow for any sense of Jewish agency — any argument that Jews may have in some way contributed to anti-Jewish sentiment — is to harm the perpetuation of this paradigm. In this sense, the ‘victim paradigm’ also contributes heavily to the claim for Jewish uniqueness and, as Norman Finkelstein has pointed out, one can clearly see in many examples of Jewish historiography the tendency to focus not so much on the “suffering of Jews” but rather on the simple fact that “Jews suffered.”[3]Finkelstein, N. ‘The Holocaust Industry,’ Index on Censorship, 29:2, 120-130, p.124 As a result, the paradigm offers no place to non-Jewish suffering. … The omission of the Jewish contribution to the development of anti-Semitism (be it in a village setting or a national setting), leaves the spotlight burning all the more ferociously on the ‘aggressor.’ Within this context, the blameless victim is free to make the most ghastly accusations, basking in the assurance that his own role, and by extension his own character, is unimpeachable. The word of this untainted, unique, blameless victim is taken as fact — to doubt his account is to be in league with the ‘aggressor.’

Jewish historiography can be interpreted in some ways as little more than a catalog of “accusations of accusations,” to the extent that such works invariably explain historical European behavior, often exaggerated, by positing Europeans as acting on a number of irrational and fanatical beliefs about Jews. This is true of historiographical accounts of almost every historical outbreak of violence against Jews, in which Europeans are presented as indulging in pogroms because of religious fanaticism during the Crusades or putative panics about alleged Jewish ritual murder. Certain fringe elements of European folklore about Jews, such as the idea that male Jews menstruate or that Jews buried their dead with rocks so that they could throw them at Christ in the afterlife, are brought front and center in mainstream historiography and used to explain very complex situations that certainly require a more nuanced understanding.

Arguably, similar results are achieved in more contemporary history through a mainstream scholarship that argues that mass Jewish casualties during World War Two were the result of another alleged European fantasy—that of race science. The actual role of Jews in European society prior to the war can be discarded, and in fact largely has been discarded, in favor of an approach that attributes Jewish deaths to just another manifestation of European irrationality and fanaticism. As stated above, however, making the case that perhaps race science wasn’t irrational, or a fantasy, is tantamount to an admission to being in league with the ‘aggressor’ — something that few or no mainstream academics are willing to do.

The result is a body of historiography that implicitly, and sometimes explicitly, bases its argument on the idea that historical Europeans were profoundly ignorant and superstitious. Such perceptions, of course, live on in the Jewish mind, and one can only interpret aspects of Sacha Baron Cohen’s Borat (2006), especially its depictions of Eastern Europeans who believe that Jews hatch from eggs and can shape-shift into cockroaches (and can be persuaded to leave by having cash thrown at them), as a reinforcement of Jewish conceptions of their history. A scene depicting Cohen lying in bed, in terror at finding himself in the home of two old Jews, and clutching a cross and a fistful of cash, is intended as the ultimate parody of the historical Christian and his alleged fantasies about Jews — both religious and economic. We are encouraged to laugh alongside Jews at the apparent stupidity of our ancestors.

The Black Death in Jewish Historiography

One of the most oft-repeated of these putatively parody-worthy historical European “canards” is the idea that Jews in some way caused the Black Death (Great Bubonic Plague), an epidemiological disaster that claimed the lives of somewhere between 30% and 60% of the European population in the middle of the fourteenth century. In mainstream Jewish historiography, the most politically useful, and therefore most prominent, aspect of this particular “canard” is the notion that Jews caused the plague by poisoning the wells of Europeans. Thus we are encouraged to see such a belief as a variant on the “Blood Libel” that Jews perform ritual murder of Christians. Added to this basic framework are multiple allusions to Christian suspicions that Jews engaged in well-poisoning out of a desire to wipe out or subjugate Christians and pave the way for Jewish world domination. The underlying message of the focus on such beliefs is therefore the idea that historical Europeans were ignorant (scientifically and morally) and paranoid about Jews to the point of irrationality. Because significant numbers of Jews were set upon and killed during the years when the Black Death was active, such narratives about Europeans contain the additional message that Europeans are dangerous fantasists, and that Jews are their unfortunate and blameless victims.

The problem with historiography like this is that it’s yet another example of taking what were really just fringe beliefs and placing them as the primary motivation for complex and deep-rooted inter-ethnic hostility. The result is a wholesale condemnation of European society. For example, Robert Wistrich, now deceased, was a prominent producer of anti-European histories of anti-Semitism and claimed in one of his most famous works that “The Black Death which raged in Europe between 1347 and 1360 added yet another deadly accusation against the Jews — that of poisoning wells in order to wipe out Christians and establish their domination of the world. There is no doubt that the masses believed this charge.”[4]Wistrich, R. Antisemitism: The Longest Hatred (London: Thames Methuen, 1991), 32 [emphasis added] The Israeli historian Mordechai Breuer (1918–2007) wrote in one of his seminal essays on “The Black Death and antisemitism” that “the destruction of the Jews in the days of the plague was associated with the well-poisoning libel … There is no doubt that the masses believed all the stories of the atrocities attributed to the Jews.”[5]Breuer, M. “The Black Death and antisemitism,” in Almog, S. 1988. Antisemitism through the ages. Oxford, England: Published for the Vidal Sassoon International Center for the Study of Antisemitism, the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, by Pergamon Press, 140-1. [emphasis added] The similarity between these phrases, together with certain other textual “coincidences” have always suggested to me that Wistrich basically engaged in a quasi-plagiarism of the volume in which Breuer’s essay appeared (Antisemitism Through the Ages, 1988) for his own Antisemitism: The Longest Hatred, which appeared a few years later (1991). Regardless of such finer points, patterns of mutual reliance, often devoid of reference to verifiable contemporary primary material, are endemic in the Jewish writing of histories of antisemitism. Breuer simply had to assert that it was beyond doubt that “the masses” were beholden to irrational myths, and this was sufficient in itself for Wistrich to repeat.

Mutual referencing over time led to a situation in which the idea that Europeans irrationally blamed Jews for the Black Death is now ubiquitous. Frederic Cople Jaher writes that “Already deemed lethal foes of Christianity, Jews were blamed for causing the Plague by poisoning wells. … Another delusion about Jews that intensified at the time of the Black Death was the charge of a world Jewish conspiracy against Christianity.”[6]Jaher, F. A Scapegoat in the New Wilderness: The Origins and Rise of Antisemitism in America (Harvard: Harvard University Press, 1994), 68. An entire chapter of Norman Cantor’s In the Wake of the Plague: The Black Death and the World It Made (2001) is devoted to an attempted deconstruction of claims of “The Jewish Conspiracy,” with Cantor arguing that Christians “made scapegoats of the Jews, charged them with spreading the plague by poisoning wells, and unleashed horrific pogroms on them.”[7]Cantor, N. In the Wake of the Plague: The Black Death and the World It Made (New York: Simon & Schuster, 2015), 152. Mark Cohen has written that the Black Death “witnessed massive pogroms against the Jews, who were believed to have poisoned wells in an attempt to destroy Christian civilization.”[8]Cohen, M. R. Under Crescent and Cross: The Jews in the Middle Ages (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994), 169. Perhaps the most savage character assassination of the European peoples, however, was carried out by the highly-incentivized non-Jewish historian Gavin Langmuir, who was for obvious reasons a firm favorite in the Jewish establishment. In his extravagantly-praised History, Religion, and Antisemitism (1990), Langmuir opined in relation to the Black Death that:

It would be hard to find a clearer example of irrational scapegoating. … By the late Middle Ages, in order to dispel doubts about their religion and themselves, many Christians were suppressing their capacity for rational empirical thought and irrationally attributing to the realities they denoted as “Jews” unobservable characteristics.[9]Langmuir, G. I. (1990). History, Religion, and Antisemitism. Berkeley: University of California Press, 301-2.

But is any of this true?

The Myth of Irrational European Pogroms

Some of the most recent, cutting-edge historiography from non-Jewish academics continues to chip away at some of the Jewish-led consensus that formed between the 1960s and early 2000s.[10]The work of the late John Doyle Klier on the mythic elements of the Russian pogroms is almost certainly without peer in this regard. For example, as the scholar Cordelia Hess has touched upon in her Berghahn-published The Absent Jews (2017), at least some of the historiographical accounts of anti-Jewish massacres alleged to have occurred during the Black Death are now acknowledged as being based on little more than hearsay, unreliable sources, misreadings of verifiable sources, and, to use Hess’s words, “no actual evidence of anti-Jewish pogroms.”[11]Hess, C. The Absent Jews: Kurt Forstreuter and the Historiography of Medieval Prussia (New York: Berghahn, 2007, 204. In fact, it has now been discovered that some alleged pogroms have been attributed to German towns where there had never been Jewish settlements.[12]Ibid.
(Hess, C. The Absent Jews: Kurt Forstreuter and the Historiography of Medieval Prussia (New York: Berghahn, 2007, 204.)

Of course, some violence against Jew did occur, and it occurred right across Europe. But was it motivated by “irrational” ideas about well-poisoning based on little more than fanatical religious bigotry? Contrary to the assertions of the Jewish academics named above, due to a scarcity of contemporary primary sources there is actually no definitive methodology for ascertaining how widespread certain beliefs were among “the masses” in this instance, and certainly nothing that would justify such claims as “there is no doubt the masses believed this charge.” What we do have are a relatively small number of accounts of attacks on Jews from contemporary chroniclers that paint a rather nuanced picture of what really occurred. Take, for example, the following extract from the records of the chronicler Conrad von Megenburg:

In many wells, bags filled with poison were found, and a countless number of Jews were massacred in the Rhineland, in Franconia, and in all the German countries. In truth, I do not know whether certain Jews had done this. Had it been thus, assuredly the evil would have been worse. But I know, on the other hand, that no German city had so many Jews as Vienna, and so many of them there succumbed to the plague that they were obliged to enlarge their cemetery greatly and to buy two more buildings. They would have been very stupid to poison themselves. … But I do not wish to whitewash the wickedness of the Jews.

What stands out here is von Megenburg’s scepticism. My own interpretation of the third sentence, assuming “the evil” to be the massacres and not the act of poisoning, is that if definitive proof had been found against certain Jews in regards to the bags of poison that had in fact been found in “many wells,” then the violence would “have been much worse,” and this would indicate the violence itself was at least not solely rooted in the accusation of well-poisoning, since some doubt was evidently present among those who carried out the killings. Alternately, if “the evil” being referred to was the act of poisoning, this account would suggest the author believed there was a possibility of two different events occurring — both a plague of undetermined cause, and a mass poisoning campaign orchestrated by Jews.[13]For a more contemporary parallel one might point to the post-war plot by Israelis to poison the German water supply that was only abandoned when it was disrupted by British authorities. Whether Jews did or did not place bags of poison in European wells strikes me as entirely beside the point. If they did not, the question remains as to why someone would accuse them of it, or frame them for it, and Borat-like ignorance and religious hostility is simply insufficient to contextualize and explain this behavior. If some Jews did engage in the poisoning of wells, and we certainly know that it was not uncommon for medieval Jewish communities to possess their own private wells and water supply within their walled districts, this doesn’t detract from our current knowledge about the origins, nature, and spread of bubonic plague, and we would be left with certain other questions about the nature of this inter-ethnic hostility.

The question remaining is why some Jews were attacked and killed during the Black Death. Here, again, modern scholarship is reversing some of the received wisdoms of older Jewish historiography and casting doubt on some long-held assumptions. The German scholar Iris Ritzmann, for example, has argued that “there is no direct link between the massacres and the plague,” and has suggested that a much deeper undercurrent of socio-economic friction between Jews and Christians merely found expression during a time of heightened social anxiety. Ritzmann has gone as far as to argue that relations were so bad that massacres may have occurred even without the plague as a trigger event.[14]Ritzmann I. [The Black Death as a cause of the massacres of Jews: A Myth of Medical History?] Medizin, Gesellschaft, und Geschichte : Jahrbuch des Instituts fur Geschichte der Medizin der Robert Bosch Stiftung. 1998 ;17:101-130. Mordechai Breuer concedes that “none of the traditional motifs” of religious anti-Semitism feature in the minutes of the interrogations of the Jews accused during the Black Death, adding “at most, they came up in connection with distant rumors about the matter.”[15]Breuer, “The Black Death and antisemitism,” 144. There were almost no attempts to convert the Jews, and Breuer further adds, quite contrary to some of his other assertions, that “the attackers had no intention whatever of forcing the Jews to change their faith and this was not the focus of what was happening.”

What, then, was happening?

Again, in contrast to his overall conclusion and blanket accusations against the historical European masses, Breuer is forced to concede in the middle of his own study that “an analysis of what occurred during the days of the plague indicates that social, economic, and political factors were of much greater import in fanning the flame of antisemitism than is generally understood.” Most of the aggressors during the Black Death were craftsmen and artisans who had been lent money by Jews “at usurious rates of interest.”[16]Ibid., 145.
(Breuer, “The Black Death and antisemitism,” 144.)
These craftsmen, essentially the middle class of their day, resented the formation of a mercantile alliance between the aristocracy and the merchant class that exploited their labor and suppressed the prices of their goods. Moreover, underpinning this alliance was a system of Jewish loans that upset the natural order they were used to. Rather predictably, anti-Jewish violence was ruthlessly suppressed by urban elites everywhere because these elites were tightly connected to Jewish finance. Documents still survive from Cologne, Freiburg, Basel, Heilbronn, Strasbourg, and Erfurt showing that city councils interpreted all anti-Jewish actions as a more general attack upon the elite status quo. Breuer comments that “by the beginning of 1349 it was clear that a number of city councils wished to suppress the popular uprising from fear that the mobs might oust them.” The European “masses” described in Jewish historiography were in fact divided into factions, each with its own particular interests, and genuine adherence to “irrational” notions of well-poisoning was of minimal import. The bottom line was that Jews were regarded as having a negative effect on the social, economic, and political fabric of the nation, and not without cause.

Conclusion

One wonders if, decades or centuries from now, Jewish historians will lament the persistence of antisemitism by explaining that Europeans once “irrationally” blamed the Jews for COVID-19. As evidence, perhaps they’ll point to some excerpts from 8chan and argue that this was the belief of “the masses.” Here I’m employing a caricature of sorts, but one not totally detached from precedent. Many decades of Jewish effort have gone into pushing the idea that our ancestors were unsophisticated Borat-like brutes who subjected the Jews to countless irrational massacres. And, although modern scholarship is chipping at the edges of this edifice, new discoveries and arguments remain far from the mainstream. One persists in seeking immunity to the contrivances of Jews and plagues.

Notes

[1] Prager, D. & Telushkin, J, Why the Jews? The Reason for Antisemitism (New York: Simon & Schuster, 2003), 85.

[2] Ritzmann I. [The Black Death as a cause of the massacres of Jews: A Myth of Medical History?] Medizin, Gesellschaft, und Geschichte : Jahrbuch des Instituts fur Geschichte der Medizin der Robert Bosch Stiftung. 1998 ;17:101-130.

[3] Finkelstein, N. ‘The Holocaust Industry,’ Index on Censorship, 29:2, 120-130, p.124

[4] Wistrich, R. Antisemitism: The Longest Hatred (London: Thames Methuen, 1991), 32

[5] Breuer, M. “The Black Death and antisemitism,” in Almog, S. 1988. Antisemitism through the ages. Oxford, England: Published for the Vidal Sassoon International Center for the Study of Antisemitism, the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, by Pergamon Press, 140-1.

[6] Jaher, F. A Scapegoat in the New Wilderness: The Origins and Rise of Antisemitism in America (Harvard: Harvard University Press, 1994), 68.

[7] Cantor, N. In the Wake of the Plague: The Black Death and the World It Made (New York: Simon & Schuster, 2015), 152.

[8] Cohen, M. R. Under Crescent and Cross: The Jews in the Middle Ages (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994), 169.

[9] Langmuir, G. I. (1990). History, Religion, and Antisemitism. Berkeley: University of California Press, 301-2.

[10] The work of the late John Doyle Klier on the mythic elements of the Russian pogroms is almost certainly without peer in this regard.

[11] Hess, C. The Absent Jews: Kurt Forstreuter and the Historiography of Medieval Prussia (New York: Berghahn, 2007, 204.

[12] Ibid.

[13] For a more contemporary parallel one might point to the post-war plot by Israelis to poison the German water supply that was only abandoned when it was disrupted by British authorities.

[14] Ritzmann I. [The Black Death as a cause of the massacres of Jews: A Myth of Medical History?] Medizin, Gesellschaft, und Geschichte : Jahrbuch des Instituts fur Geschichte der Medizin der Robert Bosch Stiftung. 1998 ;17:101-130.

[15] Breuer, “The Black Death and antisemitism,” 144.

[16] Ibid., 145.

(Republished from The Occidental Observer by permission of author or representative)
 
• Category: History, Ideology • Tags: Academia, Anti-Semitism, Coronavirus, Disease, Jews 
Hide 174 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. Meimou says:

    Such perceptions, of course, live on in the Jewish mind, and one can only interpret aspects of Sacha Baron Cohen’s Borat (2006), especially its depictions of Eastern Europeans who believe that Jews hatch from eggs and can shape-shift into cockroaches

    You mean they can’t?

  2. About 20 years ago in Los Angeles, I had a Jewish neighbor named Tom whom I shared a love of classical music with. He and I liked chess very much, and we were planning to play soon. A most cultured and thoughtful person, I estimated. Except when it came to Jewish behavior. Israel had just inflicted one of their bi-annual mowing of the grass exercises, murdering a couple of thousand Semites known as Palestinians, and I said something critical about the Israeli government. He immediately defended them and after a brief exchange, I asked, “Is the whole world wrong and the Israelis right?” “Yes, that’s right,” he defiantly asserted. Stunned at his response, I lost some respect for Tom, and our friendship slowly dissolved. We never played chess or discussed Beethoven after that.

    What causes an otherwise reasonable adult to say the most childish things? With notable exceptions like Miko Peled, Norman Finkelstein, Ron Unz and others, Jews always seem to think of themselves as the victims, never the victimizers, Along with their “impertinent fables” as Voltaire described their bible, which puts themselves at the center of the universe–demigods among humans, surpassing all other nations or Gentiles in the eyes of their God–it’s no wonder every major country has had a Jewish Problem. The solution to it is for Jews as a whole to get honest with themselves and stop acting like they are a unique species of homo sapiens. Otherwise, as Voltaire again wrote, they might someday be responsible for the destruction of the whole world.

  3. significant numbers of Jews were set upon and killed during the years when the Black Death was active

    Some people killed some other people during the Middle Ages? This is shocking news from an era known for its pacifism and vegetarianism..

  4. Franz says:

    The Vatican to the Rescue!

    “Popular opinion blamed the Jews for the plague, and pogroms erupted throughout Europe. Pope Clement VI issued two papal bulls in 1348 (6 July and 26 September), the latter named Quamvis Perfidiam, which condemned the violence and said those who blamed the plague on the Jews had been “seduced by that liar, the Devil.

    Wiki’s page on Clement VI repeats pretty much the same. Not saying that Rome was infiltrated by 1348 but maybe it was.

  5. anarchyst says:

    After World War I in Poland, one American officer noted:

    “The school children were next bathed and deloused. Gorman observing that ‘if the older people were as enthusiastic as these children, typhus would no longer be a dread in Poland.’ Unfortunately, the older people were content to live in the unimaginable dirt and filth, one old woman having been heard to cry out, ‘death here in my hovel rather than the torture of bathing.’” (Alfred E. Cornebise, “Typhus and Doughboys”, 1982, p. 65)

    A book by Jewish historian Lucy Dawidowicz confirms:
    “In the Warsaw ghetto alone, epidemic typhus was believed to have affected between 100,000 and 150,000 persons, though the official figures were barely over 15,000. The spread of disease was concealed from the Germans. Hospital cases of typhus were recorded as ‘elevated fever’ or pneumonia. Mainly, the stricken were treated in their homes in a massive clandestine operation, covering up the presence of the disease from German inspection teams who periodically threatened to seal off the affected areas.” (Lucy S. Dawidowicz, “The War Against The Jews 1933-1945”, 1975, p. 289)
    History professor Alfred E. Cornebise stated regarding American efforts in the town of Wlodowa in the 1920s:
    “… further difficulties were in the form of considerable resistance among the population to bathe.

    The town’s officials also vacillated, whereupon the police had to be used to compel the people to do so. Soon the town officials devised a plan whereby those persons who had been bathed were provided with a ticket and only those who possessed one could buy bread and potatoes in the stores. However, this was rather ineffective as forged tickets soon appeared and also, as Gillespie [an American first lieutenant] contemptuously charged, ‘The Jews would get their tickets, alter the name on them and sell them to some other person.’ … Moreover, as Snidow recounted, ‘in the first preliminary council we were assured by the priest, the rabbi and mayor and later confirmed by two doctors that not a soul in the town had had a bath for over a year.

    This statement we considered conservative and I personally doubt if water had touched the persons of most of them since the departure of the Germans during whose occupation they were required to bathe at least once a week, when they could be caught.’ There was a good community bathhouse, but the people had ‘formed a horror of it’ from being compelled to bathe there by the Germans, and would not use it.“ (Cornebise, p. 66)

    General Patton in his diaries also describes a situation where he was in the presence of Jewish “Displaced Persons” who lived in indescribable filth so disgusting he vomited. He actually describes scenes like this in at least 3 separate instances. Naturally, this was not something the majority of Jews were like, but some small, impoverished minority.

    Most of the Jews swarming over Germany immediately after the war came from Poland and Russia, and Patton found their personal habits shockingly uncivilized.

    He was disgusted by their behavior in the camps for Displaced Persons (DP’s) which the Americans built for them and even more disgusted by the way they behaved when they were housed in German hospitals and private homes. He observed with horror that “these people do not understand toilets and refuse to use them except as repositories for tin cans, garbage, and refuse . . . They decline, where practicable, to use latrines, preferring to relieve themselves on the floor.”

    He described in his diary one DP camp, “where, although room existed, the Jews were crowded together to an appalling extent, and in practically every room there was a pile of garbage in one corner which was also used as a latrine. The Jews were only forced to desist from their nastiness and clean up the mess by the threat of the butt ends of rifles. Of course, I know the expression ‘lost tribes of Israel’ applied to the tribes which disappeared — not to the tribe of Judah from which the current sons of bitches are descended. However, it is my personal opinion that this too is a lost tribe — lost to all decency.”

    Patton’s initial impressions of the Jews were not improved when he attended a Jewish religious service at Eisenhower’s insistence. His diary entry for September 17, 1945, reads in part:

    “This happened to be the feast of Yom Kippur, so they were all collected in a large, wooden building, which they called a synagogue. It behooved General Eisenhower to make a speech to them. We entered the synagogue, which was packed with the greatest stinking bunch of humanity I have ever seen. When we got about halfway up, the head rabbi, who was dressed in a fur hat similar to that worn by Henry VIII of England and in a surplice heavily embroidered and very filthy, came down and met the General . . . The smell was so terrible that I almost fainted and actually about three hours later lost my lunch as the result of remembering it.”

    These experiences and a great many others firmly convinced Patton that the Jews were an especially unsavory variety of creature and hardly deserving of all the official concern the American government was bestowing on them.

    Just recently, stinky jews were kicked off a flight out of Detroit. The other passengers complained about their stench.
    To the airline’s credit and kindness, they provided these stinky jews with a hotel room so they could clean themselves up. They were then put on a flight to their destination the next morning.
    Sad to say, the stinky jews are now suing the airline for not allowing them to “fly while stinky”.
    Follow the shekels…

    • Agree: Kratoklastes
    • Thanks: Ann Nonny Mouse
  6. Pheasant says:
    @carsondyal

    I well believe it.

    Just remember Jewish enthocentrism is rampant no matter what bourgeois exterior is used to camofluage it.

    I have had friends I did not know were Jewish (they pretended to be other ethnicities) and have had many a nasty experience realising how different they truly are.

    Kind of reminds me of Alice Walker and her poem ‘it is our frightful duty to study the talmud’. She had what she thought were many close Jewish friends and she offered mild critiques of Israeli behaviour only to be met by a wave of hysterical ugly Jewish ethnocentrism. She eventually realised that just because these Jews were indulging/using her over black civil rights did not mean they were her friends- thier Jewish tribalism was merely hidden and disguised behind universalist talk which evaporated the moment Jewish interests were threatened.

    She eventually advised reading the talmud to understand just how alien Jews really are!

    I have had similar experiences but with a couple of exceptions I only realised what had happened after I took the red pill. To be met with people who hypocritically pretend to be faithful (and in many cases who actively preach) universalist ethics only to turn around and favour thier tribe the moment it suits them disgusts me and suffice to say I do not want Jewish friends any more.

    Its why I find thr hasbara trolls on Unz.com so useful- reminds me of what they are capable of.

  7. Pheasant says:
    @anarchyst

    Interesting.

    I have known Jews who did not bathe regularly.

  8. There is an ancient basis in fact for the “blood libel”. When the Zealot rebellion against Rome began in 66 CE, they tricked the Roman soldiers guarding Jerusalem into laying down their weapons on the promise of safe conduct out of Judaea. Instead the men were bound and ritually slaughtered –their throats cut like Paschal lambs. This is the historical event on which the Medieval belief of Jewish ritual human sacrifice would be based. Denying the fighting men the place of honor in the afterlife that a death in honorable combat would have earned them in Roman belief was an intolerable insult. This is why the Roman legionaries gave no quarter to those who so grotesquely defamed their comrades and their gods when they restored order in the province. Despite the myth of eternal persecution, before this, Jews had enjoyed special privileges granted to no other ethnic group in the empire.

    When John the evangelist crafted the story of the Jewish mob in Jerusalem baying for the blood of Jesus, he knew adding this detail would make a deep impression on those in his Roman audience who still carried traumatic memories of the grisly murders of their sons and fathers by those ungrateful provincial barbarians.

    • Thanks: Alfred
    • Troll: GazaPlanet
    • Replies: @Anon
    , @Gleimhart Mantooso
  9. Anon[308] • Disclaimer says:
    @Observator

    There is an ancient basis in fact for the “blood libel”. When the Zealot rebellion against Rome began in 66 CE, they tricked the Roman soldiers guarding Jerusalem into laying down their weapons on the promise of safe conduct out of Judaea. Instead the men were bound and ritually slaughtered –their throats cut like Paschal lambs.

    Good information.

    The Paschal lamb has never meant to represent a literal lamb.

    In the Jewish religion, the Paschal Lamb has always been a thin allegory for the sacrifice of a human gentile male.

    Why would the Jewish god “pass over” Jewish homes because the blood of a literal animal is on the door, when hunting for Egyptian boys to kill?

    It makes no theological sense.

    The blood over the door is the blood of a male human child, in an effort to communicate to the Jewish god that the blood of an Egyptian male child has already been killed in that house.

    Rendering further hunting and killing of any child within that house to be unnecessary.

    That’s the meaning of the Paschal Lamb sacrifice.

    Which is corroborated by the explanation of the symbolism that I below explain.

    But also by the long-standing accusations against Jews for kidnapping and murdering gentile male children on Passover.

    And the parallel “Paschal Lamb” method of execution used in the above story of the slaughter of the Roman Soldiers.

    [MORE]

    I suspect that other corroborating examples could be readily found in our shared history.

    The Paschal “Lamb” is the murder of an out-group male (or males) to prevent Jewish male death.

    A method that was eventually theologized into taking the form of human sacrifice ritual.

    A human sacrifice ritual that was later occluded by killing and eating Lamb instead (except for zealous Rabbis who occasionally wish to conduct the original ritual, according to long-standing accusations).

    The actual meaning of the symbolism I suspect was long known to ancient non-Jewish groups who strongly condemned the Jews.

    Recall that Jews frame non-Jews as animals throughout their texts.

    Jews see only Jewish souls as human. A fact that can be verified in their recorded statements and texts.

    This is open information.

    Jews symbolize non-Jews as animals, especially in their various “animal sacrifice” holidays that occur throughout the year and then again before their coming Messianic Period of World Rule.

    For example, the “blemish free” Red Heifer, to be sacrificed by the Jewish Messiah to herald their coming Messianic Age (and likely to herald Christ’s return and revenge, or the “Wrath of the Lamb”, for Christians) is a lazy representation of a human scapegoat. “Blemish free”, essentially meaning sin-free or innocent. Parallel to Christ and all murdered innocents. It does not literally refer to a cow with perfect red hair.

    When the Rabbis announce that the perfect Red Heifer has been born, the World should be nervous because they have announced an impending human sacrifice of a perfect innocent, or a group of them.

    When Cain (the first agriculturalist, in line with agriculture originating around Israel) slew Abel, he was slaying a type of symbolic Ram. A Ram is the Shepherd or King of an out-group flock of symbolic Lambs.

    In ancient Semitic culture, Semites represented enemy Kings with Lambs in magic ritual in which the Lambs would be killed. See the wiki of the Cuthean Legend of Naram Sin:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cuthean_Legend_of_Naram-Sin

    The enemy hordes are created by the great gods, with Belet-ili their progenitress and Tiamat their wet nurse. Led by seven kings, and numbering 360,000 troops, the hordes begin their conquests of the Mesopotamian hinterlands. Naram-Sin dispatches a scout to prick them with a pin to determine whether they bleed. This he confirms concluding that they are mortal. He conducts extispicy with seven sacrificial lambs representing each of the antagonists’ kings.

    Cain’s slaying of Abel (the Shepherd-Ram-Lamb) was the first murder.

    Recall that, according to the Jews as well as can be easily discerned via close reading, Cain is the progeny of the Serpent of the Garden of Eden, not the offspring of God’s creation: Adam.

    In other words, Cain is the progeny of the Devil who mated with a human woman. As such, he is the lineage of the Devil.

    The first murder (of Abel) being that of an innocent and of a representative of the group preferred by God.

    Abel and his wider group were marked as preferred via God’s open preference of Abel’s sacrifice of those of his own flock-tribe.

    In lieu of Cain’s sacrifice of those of other tribes – or Cain’s “harvest” of his “crop”.

    To in-part confirm the human nature of Cain’s rejected sacrifice, see the widespread use of the Harvest and Crop symbolism for people in the Bible.

    To this day, the Rabbi’s hold that Cain’s sacrifice of Abel occurred on Passover. Confirming Abel’s otherwise obvious parallel with the Paschal Lamb as well as his parallel with Christ.

    Christ’s murder and resurrection occur over Passover weekend because Christ represents the Paschal Lamb.

    Christ is essentially a type of reincarnation of Abel, as well as all “Paschal Lambs”.

    Christ’s return and subsequent actions are the “Wrath of the Lamb”, or the revenge of the Paschal Lamb against his murderers.

    This is why Jews hate Christ and Christianity above all else, and why Jews can be any other religion but Christian while retaining their status as an in-group Jew.

    Christianity is the specific anti-Jewish religion because it is the precise counter “magic” to their human sacrifice rituals. Christianity works toward the time when, eventually, the God of the innocent victims (lambs) of the Jews will return to exact their revenge in-full.

    This is the core meaning of Christianity and the core reason for Jewish hate toward it.

    This is why any notion of “Judeo-Christian” is mostly a lie.

    Christ is finally killed with the spear of the Roman soldier.

    The latter being the symbolic descendant of the founder of Rome: Romulus and by extension Romulus’s father Mars, the Father of War.

    Romulus, in turn, is the direct mythological parallel to Cain-Enoch (via Romulus’s slaughter of his brother Remus) and via Romulus’s founding of civilization (Rome).

    This slaughter of the innocent Ram-Lamb, Abel, led to the first lie to God and Cain’s resulting expulsion into the land of Nod.

    Within which his lineage (Enoch) built the first city / civilization.

    An aside: What is implied is that civilization is founded on the continuous murder of innocents and lies about those murders to God and everyone else. Making the victims scapegoats (murdered innocents who are falsely believed to be guilty). I could go deeper into this, but it is beyond the scope of this post.

    Cain’s sacrifice of Abel is later reenacted with the Paschal Lamb sacrifice, but instead the Jews frame it as a method to fool God into not killing their sons.

    So, parallel with Cain’s lie, the Jewish sacrifice of the “Paschal Lamb” is that of an an out-group male and is meant to save their own sons. Cain also only sacrificed his “crop”, or dehumanized peoples that are cultivated specifically for harvesting and eating. He did not sacrifice anything of his “flock”.

    This is the original ancient basis in fact of the “blood libel”.

    The Jewish religion is one of human sacrifice, but specifically its an attack on non-Jewish males.

    I would argue, via Lamb-Ram-Aries symbolism and historical-conflict context, that more specifically Judaism is a religion focused on the murder of Aryan males.

    In a Darwinian context, it could be theorized that this is to give non-Aryan (southern) males of differing races increased access to hard-won Aryan women that are always in proportionally shorter supply than women of other races.

    If Levant and Anatolian Neanderthals required Cro Magnon females to improve their genetic stock (and become “human” in the manner that we know humans), this could be one originating ancient reason for this seething haterd of Aryan males and the mandate for access to our females. I digress, but we’ve also had Jews in he comments section on this very board explain that they only hate Aryan males and primarily want access to our females.

    When John the evangelist crafted the story of the Jewish mob in Jerusalem baying for the blood of Jesus, he knew adding this detail would make a deep impression on those in his Roman audience who still carried traumatic memories of the grisly murders of their sons and fathers by those ungrateful provincial barbarians.

    They beyed for the Blood of Christ as they do for all Paschal Lambs.

    • Agree: Catdomnj
    • Replies: @Carey knows
  10. Certain fringe elements of European folklore about Jews, such as the idea that male Jews menstruate

    since this is a description of Feminism:

    Jewish historiography is saturated with allusions to the “unique” status of Jews, who have suffered a “unique” hatred at the hands of successive generations of Europeans. In essence, it is the notion that Jews stand alone in the world as the quintessential “blameless victim.” To allow for any sense of Jewish agency — any argument that Jews may have in some way contributed to anti-Jewish sentiment — is to harm the perpetuation of this paradigm. In this sense, the ‘victim paradigm’ also contributes heavily to the claim for Jewish uniqueness and, as Norman Finkelstein has pointed out, one can clearly see in many examples of Jewish historiography the tendency to focus not so much on the “suffering of Jews” but rather on the simple fact that “Jews suffered.”[3] As a result, the paradigm offers no place to non-Jewish suffering. … The omission of the Jewish contribution to the development of anti-Semitism (be it in a village setting or a national setting), leaves the spotlight burning all the more ferociously on the ‘aggressor.’ Within this context, the blameless victim is free to make the most ghastly accusations, basking in the assurance that his own role, and by extension his own character, is unimpeachable. The word of this untainted, unique, blameless victim is taken as fact — to doubt his account is to be in league with the ‘aggressor.’

    it is more than reasonable to assume Jews menstruate (likely more than once a month)

  11. @carsondyal

    A Jewish life-long friend of mine is exactly the same. A splendid guy in every respect he’s nonetheless totally and utterly unwilling to ever concede Jewish wrong-doing on anything. Not even 1% culpability. The shutters come down. It’s truly amazing.

  12. “Jewish historiography is saturated with allusions to the ‘unique’ status of Jews, who have suffered a ‘unique’ hatred at the hands of successive generations of Europeans.”

    As Joyce argues, their ‘persecution’ was always a function of their unique (parasitical) behaviour. Only one other race in old Europe was reviled just as much as the Jews, and that was the Gypsies. Coincidence? Hardly. Jews are basically somewhat higher IQ Gypsies.

    Another point that needs to be made is that ‘anti-Semitism’ is not unique to Europeans. If you need any proof of that, just look at how they are now regarded by the Arabs and the Persians. This myth of White, Christian craziness is kept alive by the Jews in order to project away their own moral perfidy onto another race.

  13. @Irish Savant

    how can this creature be a “friend” of yours?

    • Agree: Pheasant
  14. Because he’s a nice guy. Generous and helpful. He once spent about four hours in a tight cramped space fixing my domestic water pump. He’s the kind of person I’d go to if I was in a jam. Like most Jews he just has this neurotic dimension when it comes to his tribe.

    • Replies: @Fuerchtegott
    , @Catdomnj
  15. AaronB says:

    Eh, not as unreasonable as I expected, Andrew.

    So basically it was a class war.

    The craftsman and middle classes wanted to enrich themselves, and the aristocracy wanted to enrich themselves. A classic class war.

    Into this heady mix were thrust the Jews, who as a vulnerable foreign population whose religion was an object of hostility by the masses as a matter of prudence allied with the seemingly stronger power, the aristocracy.

    This undoubtedly captures a big slice of the picture, and to the extent that this has been underplayed should definitely be given attention and emphasized.

    I’m totally against the demonization of Christian European populations, and all for introducing the necessary context and mitigating factors.

    So, European persecution of the Jews wasn’t totally irrational and there were mitigating factors at work here. However, it is just as silly to claim persecution of the Other is always rational – I don’t think anyone has such a Pollyannaish understanding of human nature.

    Still, it can’t be denied that Christianity began as hostile to Judaism, in that it basically saw itself as replacement to Judaism and Jews who refused to convert as liars on the side of the Devil.

    There can be no doubt that this created a unique hostile status for Jews in the minds of Christians.

    Medieval Christian Europe was not a religiously tolerant society. It is often suggested that had Jews simply kept a low profile they would have escaped persecution. But Christian Europe regularly persecuted peaceful members of other faiths. The Cathars, who had an extremely gentle and peaceful creed, were massacred in a Church led crusade. Numerous heretical creeds arose in the Middle Ages and were invariably persecuted and massacred. Protestants and Catholics, of course, waged one of the most vicious wars in European history, and peaceful sects had to flee to the American colonies to escape persecution.

    In this environment, Jews had no choice but to find powerful projectors. Without powerful protectors they never would have survived the Dark Ages. So an alliance with the aristocracy was probably the only choice they could have made. Moreover, aristocraties everywhere are more open minded and liberal, and it is doubtful the “respectable and square” burghers would have had anything to do with Jews.

    The final factor forcing Jews into a natural alliance with the aristocracy was the restrictions on which trade Jews could practice, barring them from most physical work, as well as the Jewish tradition of study and learning fitting them for more intellectual work.

    It’s important to point out that Jews were junior members in this partnership with the aristocracy in which their position depended on carrying out the desires of their patrons. The aristocracy set the tone – if policy was oppressive and usorious, it was set by the lords. Jews could hardly refuse to carry out such policies and survive.

    Overall, a tragic situation with no one clearly at fault. At most it can be said Jews were more sinned against than sinning, but their position in the social pyramid made them understandably natural targets, despite the fact that an alliance with the power holders was necessary for survival in a religiously intolerant Europe.

    I think it’s a fantastic idea to introduce nuance into this discussion and cease once and for all the demonization of Christmas European peoples. Even their religious prejudices seemed rational to them – they were not “bad” people, but simply unenlightened people acting the best they knew how based on their understanding of reality.

    And it is similarly stupid to demonize Jews.

    Maybe its time to become intelligent about humanity in general, and stop looking fur demons or angels.

  16. @AaronB

    Into this heady mix were thrust the Jews, who as a vulnerable foreign population whose religion was an object of hostility by the masses as a matter of prudence allied with the seemingly stronger power, the aristocracy. [Emphasis mine.]

    Good use of the passive voice, Aaron. It’s almost as though the Jews were forced to lend the Christians money, wasn’t it! 😀

    So, European persecution of the Jews wasn’t totally irrational and there were mitigating factors at work here.

    Thanks for clarifying that we weren’t “totally irrational”. That would be an anti-goyishe trope, you know.

    • LOL: Pheasant
    • Replies: @AaronB
  17. AaronB says:
    @Digital Samizdat

    That would be an anti-goyishe trope, you know

    .

    Exactly. That’s why I reject it. I am against the demonization of European peoples. All humans act partly irrationally, but mostly we are all trying to do the best we can according to how we see things.

    It’s almost as though the Jews were forced to lend the Christians money, wasn’t it! 😀

    More or less, they were. Most physical occupations were restricted to them. In any case, the Medieval world was very tightly controlled economically even without explicit restriction. Jewish outsiders, whose religion was despised, were not about to be given prime agricultural land, and all crafts were tightly controlled by Guilds, who didn’t accept Jews.

    Had Jews become successful agriculturalists, that would have just been another source of resentment anyways, and wouldn’t have lasted long.

    The only path to survival was to shelter under the wing of powerful protectors, and the only way to do that was to render them a service they couldn’t do themselves. That was money lending.

    • Replies: @anarchyst
    , @meena
  18. On a small point, Borat was from Kazakhstan making him Central Asian and not Eastern European as Joyce incorrectly writes. The two peoples look very different.

    • Replies: @Digital Samizdat
    , @Wielgus
  19. @Meimou

    Only Turks can shape shift into cockroaches.

    • Replies: @Eckbach
  20. Dr. Joyce,

    Hasn’t Dr. Kevin MacDonald cited (in Culture of Critique?) authentic Jewish sources quoting Freud announcing to fellow Jews as he first set foot on US soil

    “I come not bringing knowledge. I bring The Plague!”

    Now seeing the genocidal devastation the “Sexual Revolution” has visited upon the descendants of Christendom both stateside and abroad, don’t we have a first hand account/admission of intentional acts of infinite intentional poisoning by the Jew.

  21. anarchyst says:
    @AaronB

    Your comment:
    Most physical occupations were restricted to them.
    is not entirely correct.
    The guilds of the day were based on societal status and little more. If your grandfather and father were shoemakers, YOU would also be a shoemaker, their “trade” being passed down to YOU. There was a lot of nepotism in the guilds, partially because it was easy to introduce a young person to the “trade”. Societal lines dictated as such.
    Not only that, then, as it the case today, almost every jew eschews physical labor, preferring to be merchants, buying and selling merchandise, and yes, money. You see, merchants, generally sit on their @sses, while their underlings and employees do all the work.
    The more things change the more they stay the same…
    Jews gonna be jewin’.

    • Agree: BrokenheartAmerican
    • Replies: @AaronB
  22. AaronB says:
    @anarchyst

    Well, if it was passed down through family lines, Jews being newcomers and outsiders, could not have joined. People jealously guarded the privilege of being in a guild. The Jewish religion was also disliked, and society was intolerant. It really wasn’t an option.

    Jewish educational and religious texts teach that you should have a simple job, not focus on money, and concentrate on religious study. And the ancient religion was focused on agriculture – in fact, today the Jewish High Holidays often have agricultural themes.

    Jewish specialization in money making was born of the need to survive.

  23. anarchyst says:
    @AaronB

    I disagree with your assertion that jews could not get into the guilds. Throughout history, jews have always tended to be merchants and moneylenders. Jews have NEVER wanted to work an honest trade or job , instead they would rather “sit like effendi”, having others (non-jews) do the work for them.
    All one has to do is look at the moneylenders in the temple that Jesus Christ threw out. The jewish love for moneylending and disdain for honest work has been around for thousands of years.
    The eastern European ashkenazic jews are some of the worst, being liquor merchants, running whorehouses and shylock operations, doing nothing to improve the communities where they lived.
    As I previously stated, “jews gonna be jewin’”

    • Replies: @Moi
  24. @Anon

    That was an excellent dissertation….have you ever looked into gematria? look up Paschal Lamb, (gematrix.org,) it coordinates with some words/phrases, i.e. in (((ish gematria it can equal: Madeleine Mccann, Pandora, Fibonacci Coding, & many more. In English Gematria,one phrase is, “Kill Me Bad Idea.” In Simple Gematria, three examples are: Rise Up, Eric Dubay, & Lord Enki. Math is language ……….for fun, look up Qanon or event 201………..some even use this knowledge to make $ on sport events……All this free time can work out well…….But Misery knows Hope can’t change a thing. She/He just waits!

  25. @Just Passing Through

    Maybe so, but there are loads of ethnic Russians living in Khazakstan who were settled there by the USSR–about a third of the population, I heard. Moreover, the Borat character’s appearance and accent are clearly Russian.

  26. @Irish Savant

    So he’ll fix your stuff, just when his tribe soft genocides your kids, he’ll be very cool with it, cause they deserve it.

    That’s why I stopped being friends with Turkish people.
    Simply not possible.

    (and as the name gives away, with your friends tribe for very obvious reasons)

    • Agree: Catdomnj
  27. Many decades of Jewish effort have gone into pushing the idea that our ancestors were unsophisticated Borat-like brutes

    And a bunch of those decades (particularly the decades since the 1940s) have also put significant effort the other way: to push the idea that Eastern-European hovel-dwellers were not filthy, hygiene-absent and vermin-infested to a degree that required systematic de-lousing if they were to be housed together in large numbers in Western Europe.

    The fact that they were also stupid, primitive, superstitious and hostile to education in anything other then their stupid foundational myth, also helps explain why the ‘gassing’ narrative was a major piece of #fakenews about which these people were terrified.

    Some of the people being moved westwards had never seen, let alone used, soap: having the entire train gassed (often in a sealed tunnel) would have scared the bejesus out of the passengers.

    • Agree: Pheasant
  28. @carsondyal

    “…The solution to it is for Jews as a whole to get honest with themselves and stop acting like they are a unique species of homo sapiens…”

    According to the Talmud, Jews are the only species of homo sapiens. Non-Jews are cattle-in-human-form, especially created to serve the Jews.With such an attitude, sanctified by their religion, conflicts with the whole world are inevitable. But of course, in each conflict, the world is always wrong, never the Jews!

    • Replies: @Sam J.
    , @Wally
  29. How can one so knowledgeable of jewish shenanigans accept the official story of the current corona craze?

  30. Sam J. says:
    @AaronB

    “…Jewish specialization in money making was born of the need to survive…”

    Yeah…right. Then why when in the USSR and earlier n Russia when they were given land and implements to farm did they not do so? There’s numerous examples where the Jews say they have to be moneylenders but when ever the opportunity is given to not be, they never follow through. It’s just another Jew lie like most everything they say.

    • Replies: @Alfred
    , @Fuerchtegott
  31. utu says:

    And self-inflicted ‘pogroms’ where Jews slaughter themselves out of fear of being forcefully baptized.

    At Vienna in 1421, during that city’s violent riots against the Jews, accused of favoring and supporting the Hussites, the rabbi Natan Eger visited all the local Jewish boys in their own homes, and instructed their mothers to slaughter them without remorse if the Christians attempted to baptize them en masse. One Yiddish chronicle reports that, on that occasion, the Jewish community gathered a great number of children together in the synagogue to prevent their forced conversion, as vehemently demanded by an apostate.

    “The Jews of the community at this point began to cry in a loud voice: ‘Alas, (the Christians), may God forbid, intend to contaminate our children, holy and immaculate’. They therefore deliberated to deprive them of their lives in order to sanctify the name of God the Blessed. They drew lots and selected the pious rabbi Jonah Ha-Cohen, who was responsible for putting the decision into action. This happened during the Festival of the Capanne (Sukkot).

    “While the entire community murmured the formula of the call to repentance in a low voice, turning from one to another, the rabbi placed himself in front of the Ark containing the rolls of the Law, and cut the throats of all the children, one after the other. This occurred in the great hall, intended for men’s prayers. The women were also slaughtered, one by one, in the antechamber of the synagogue, intended for them, and this to sanctify the name of God. The last women waiting to be sacrificed turned to Jonah, the rabbi, asking him to butcher her (without entering the women’s hall, but) causing his arm to pass through the grid, which separated the two halls. Then Johan the rabbi, having no more strength to kill himself, removed the rafters in the synagogue, made a stack of them, and poured oil on them, asking God to pardon him for that which he had done to save their souls. Finally, he curled up on the almemor, setting fire to them from on top, and met death in the midst of the flames”

    Blood Passover, Ariel TOAFF, (page 100)

    Were the accusations of favoring and supporting the Hussites accurate? Did Jews often supported heretics like Hussites?

    • Thanks: Ann Nonny Mouse
  32. utu says:
    @anarchyst

    “After World War I in Poland, one American officer noted” – I have a vague recollection of reading a book written by an American officer about his mission to Poland after WWI. Probably Cornebise cites it in “Typhus and Doughboys.”

  33. Sam J. says:
    @Franklin Ryckaert

    “…The solution to it is for Jews as a whole to get honest with themselves and stop acting like they are a unique species of homo sapiens…”

    Well I for one agree with the Jews. I think they are different. I think they are a tribe of psychopaths. No not every one but it can not be denied that a bunch of Jews moving into your territory and a tribe of psychopaths are in no way distinguishable from each other. The only known tried and true 100% guaranteed method to deal with psychopaths, and Jews, is to get rid of them. Move them the hell away from you. Peacefully if you can get it but by any means necessary the Jews need to go.

    As for the Jews poisoning the wells of the Christians well why wouldn’t they? With the vast loathsome and very long history of the most gruesome torturous acts against others that the Jews have preformed a little poisoning amounts to nothing at all. If the Jews had a large amount of plague victims can’t you see them slipping over to others, not Jews, and poisoning their wells to even up the odds or just to fulfill their inherent psychopathic murderous urges to kill? Of course you could. We see that it’s 100% that they did 9-11. Building 7 fell so fast that the only thing scientifically possible to hold it up when it fell was…air. And if they did that then why wouldn’t they kill off the Chinese and everyone else with corona? They killed 10’s and 10’s of millions, maybe as many as 60 million in the USSR and the more power they have the more they kill. After all immediately they said they had, how Cohenciental. a cure. It’s fairly well evident that the Chinese are in no way going to let them run their countries into the ground like the European and Americans are and that blows their whole “rule the world” plan to shit. The Chinese control their own central banks and without the power to control the Chinese banks they will never control China. You can even up the score because immediately after corona in China Iran’s leaders come down with corona. It’s damn difficult to ascribe corona to anyone but the Jews if you know anything about their past at all. It would not surprise me in the slightest if the Jews did corona just like they did 9-11.

    Will the Jews plan to knock out the world so they can keep control work? I don’t think so. The internet is not going away and people sick of the Jews censorship are routing around the media, the main internet consolidation sites and the Jews big squawk box. Every day more and more people know their past and the Epstein, pizzagateish hold they have on our legislature and security services. Could they take on the whole country? I don’t know. Maybe, but if they can’t then the blow back will be fierce. I suspect it will be the end for them.

    • Agree: neutral, anarchyst
    • Replies: @Druid
  34. Wielgus says:
    @Just Passing Through

    I would never have been taken in by “Borat”. I have met Kazakhs and they have epicanthic eyefolds, flat faces and look like Mongolians.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    , @Really No Shit
  35. Wielgus says:
    @utu

    It may have been as much an anti-Hussite thing as anything else – the Hussites were a source of serious concern and capable of defeating Imperial armies in battle. Jews and Hussites were at the time the only exception to Catholicism in central Europe and could be associated with each other in propaganda, whether or not there was something to the claim.

    • Replies: @utu
  36. neutral says:

    It’s not the jews, it’s the world. This is the basic jewish argument to explain why jews are hated everywhere. Jews like AaronB would like to mask this with rosy arguments, but this is the essence of it, jews are hated because they by their nature induce this hatred.

    • Agree: Sam J.
  37. If bags of poison were found in European wells, who could have been responsible? With such isolated and tight knit communities, surely it could not have been one of their own for the simple reason they would fear getting infected themselves. Jews who lived in their own sealed off communities and also hated Europeans with a fierce passion seems about the only plausible suspect. As we see even today the Orthodox Jews flaunt Corona restrictions thinking their God will protect them, so why not then? The difference between the European mindset and the Jewish one is that the former will not expect protection from his God if he has sinned against another.

    • Agree: Sam J.
  38. @Observator

    John told the story; he did not craft it.

  39. Alfred says:
    @Sam J.

    I agree. There is a province of today’s Russia that was more or less given to the Jews by the Communists. It is on the border with China and not far from the Pacific. They were given a privileged status.

    Article 65 of the Constitution of Russia provides that the JAO is Russia’s only autonomous oblast. It is one of two official Jewish territories in the world, the other being Israel.

    Jewish Autonomous Oblast (Jewpedia)

    This region is almost twice the area of Israel and it has plenty of fresh water. However, the Jews have almost all gone elsewhere. too much hard work IMHO.

  40. @AaronB

    Still, it can’t be denied that Christianity began as hostile to Judaism,

    Actually, it can. The martyrdom of Stephen was just the first of many instances of Jewish persecution of Christians. Christians just wanted the Jews and the pagans to leave them alone. But the Jews and pagans wouldn’t do that, so the Christians said “hold my beer” and put Western Civilization on a direct path to its greatest achievements. And to the entire world we say, you’re welcome!

    • Agree: Truth3
    • Replies: @Franklin Ryckaert
  41. Sean says:

    In the group neighbours know you might be ready, willing, and able to help them in future, but you don’t want to be any kind of odd man out amid a pandemic.

  42. Anonymous[116] • Disclaimer says:
    @carsondyal

    The world is divided into mutually competing groups. The competition takes many forms. Evidence is the rapid rate of human evolution over the past 30 thousand years or so. Back after WW II, when introduction of nuclear weapons to military actions were regarded as analogous to an introduction of frag grenades to professional wrestling, an attempt was made to say that all people are not only equal under the law but identical.
    It is time to abandon the idea that people (or peoples) are identical. It is contrary to fact, observation, and the reduction in numbers of the groups that most strongly hold this view.
    Further, attempting to save the idea of human uniformity by attributing it solely to the Jewish population is simply the promulgation of the Jewish idea the violating the law in one way is equivalent to violating the entire law. “Step on a crack, break your mother’s back.” is the children’s version of this idea. Everything seen is perfectly good or infinitely evil, so one identifies the evil by even the tiniest departure from reality. All that saves the universe is that God is infinitely good (or, in the Islamic version, infinitely powerful). One therefore has to identify the evil, oppose it and defeat it, and what is left will be good. Hence pilpul argumentation — identifying trifles is enough to identify evil.

    For example, the Palestinians are mistreated by the Israelis. Also, the Israelis are mistreated by the Palestinians. That’s the world. Groups compete. Grow up.

    In a way, attributing tribalism only to Jews could be considered as a Jewish attempt to save the world, by taking the sins of the world on their own backs. This would protect the concept of identity among all non-Jewish humans, and save the human race from nuclear annihilation. The reasoning is contorted and the stated end unlikely to result from the stated means, but so is the basic idea that breaking any part of the Law is equivalent to breaking the entire Law.

    Speaking personally, dealing with Jewish people has always resulted in a loss, usually a big one through a hideous betrayal. Not quite as bad as dealing with the Irish, of course, or the Unitarians, or for that matter the Baptists, but bad enough. As I said, grow up.

    • Replies: @samster
  43. Druid says:

    Well, we know that post WW2 Jewish groups were trying to poison wells and bread in Germany to kill Germans. They were caught with the well-poison, but the bread was poisoned with subsequent illness among Germans. We know they assassinate, murder, etc. it’s not far-fetched that they were poisoning wells. Turds,

  44. Druid says:
    @AaronB

    Aaron B, just fade away. You’re taking up space. Your zio/Talmud/saranistbphilosophy is akin to African smelly shite. Just go away

  45. Druid says:
    @Sam J.

    Sorry, too many ignoramuses out there. Most don’t even know what bldg 7 is!

  46. @utu

    “…Did Jews often support(ed) heretics like Hussites..?”

    According to E. Michael Jones’ book The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit this was indeed the case. They could not fight the Catholic Church, which they considered as their main tormentor, directly, so they fought it indirectly by promoting the Reformation. Jews were central in printing and spreading Bible translations. Their effort was rewarded. Protestants became Old Testament orientated and rescinded the prohibition on Jews of usury. Since then we have a Protestant-Jewish cooperation which lasts to the present day.

  47. @carsondyal

    I asked, “Is the whole world wrong and the Israelis right?” “Yes, that’s right,” he defiantly asserted

    Reminded me of what Yitzhak Attia, director of French-language seminars at the Yad Vashem Holocaust Institute in Tel Aviv, wrote in April 2003 issue of the French-language Israel magazine:

    “Even if reason tells us, even shouts with all its force the very absurdity of
    this confrontation between the small and insignificant people of Israel [i.e, all
    Jewry worldwide, not just “the State of Israel”] and the rest of humanity… as
    absurd, as incoherent and as monstrous as it may seem, we are engaged in close
    combat between Israel and the Nations – and it can only be genocidal and total
    because it is about our and their identities.”

    Judaism is a cult.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  48. @AaronB

    “the idea that historical Europeans were ignorant (scientifically and morally)”
    It’s amazing, bordering on bizarre to constantly refer to Europeans circa 1350 as irrational or superstitious, let alone anti-empirical & unscientific.
    These were the middle ages.
    The Renaissance had not started. 90 something % were illiterate. They were superstitious. The famous saying “nasty short & brutish” applies perfectly to this period.
    So lets forget any ideas of “blaming”.
    And imagine the sheer horror, fear & mass incomprehension they must have felt in the face of the plague.
    Believing that the plague was God’s punishment for heretical behaviour etc is, in the circumstances, actually quite rational.

  49. Truth3 says:

    Jews are filthy. Truth.

    Jews are degenerate. Truth.

    Jews are wicked. Truth.

    Jews are evil. Truth.

    Jews hate Christians. Truth.

    So, they probably were well poisoners.

    9/11? Anyone? Lavon affair? USS Liberty? JFK? RFK? JFK Jr.?

    Tell me… am I lying?

    https://tse4.mm.bing.net/th?id=OIP.izzYGyY6Vrh5buEtLeYFRgHaDI&pid=Api&P=0&w=468&h=199

    • Agree: Druid
  50. @anarchyst

    This amazes me. Their line was always that one couldn’t eat at the same table as a Gentile because Gentiles were “unclean”. And their story is that they grew from nothing to relatively huge numbers of Ashkenazim relative to the Gentile population of Eastern Europe because ritual had always compelled them to wash their hands, so they stayed healthy and grew in numbers faster than the unclean with their dirty hands.

    Thanks, anarchist. I never knew that here as everywhere they are just dirty liars.

  51. Moi says:
    @Irish Savant

    Not arguing, but tell me how is that so different from Americans thinking they are the exceptional nation? Jews and America have much in common–including emptying the land of native peoples.

    PS: BTW, I do not have much empathy for Jews in particular.

    • Replies: @Catdomnj
  52. Tom says:

    A very educational article, Mr.Joyce. Thanks. Dennis Prager’s name was cited at the start of the piece. I used to be a huge fan of his in the ‘90s. How naïve I was. He has since become a person I am least likely to trust because he exudes a good-guy persona, a warm-hearted-let’s-all-be-brothers-in-religion approach. But I guarantee he’s a lifelong member and graduate of the Jewish University of Victimhood and a present member of Jewish Victimhood Incorporated. This guy is making a fortune as a “conservative” but how much of his true soul and mind is exclusively Jewish, and as a consequence, presumably at odds with Gentile European sensibilities? I now look at all ‘conservative’ Jews in radio and television as suspects! Secondly, I am indebted to Ron Unz for creating this fabulous web site, where serious thinkers can air it out. It all seems too good to be true. It’s my nature to be a skeptic and ponder the remote possibility that this site is a certain species of Mao’s Hundred Roses Campaign whereby honest opinions were not only welcomed but encouraged. They were encouraged so that the State could identify those who held opinions at odds with Official State Narrative. Have any of the powerful Jewish organizations, such as the ADL attempted to shut this site down? Or at least brought Mr. Unz to court for presumed hate speech? It would all be wonderful if it were just my paranoia. Any ideas on this would be appreciated.

    • Replies: @Franklin Ryckaert
    , @mcohen
  53. Bruno says:

    What’s amusing in your article is that you never consider that the jews may have caused the plague ?

    One pope had this argument who was read in all churches : Jews didn’t do it because they were disproportionately more affected than Christians so it couldn’t be them.

    But that ignores the scorpion crossing the river on a frog tale ….

    The Jewish coming in a city and buying the authorities to benefit from monopolies and then preying on the population led them to pogroms. They had enough experience of it not do it.

    People should read how Jewish treasoned Babylonian for
    Greeks and then how they treasoned Greeks (both from Egypt and Assyrian) for Roman. And how they had in the three empires an extra ordinary successful diaspora but that was always développing extremely’ destructive criticism against the host society while being great added value appropriators.

    The Roman almost destroyed the Jewish. Maybe by promoting christianism the Jews destroyed Rome.

    Ps : the alliance between Greek baring names Jews and Rome is recorded and we have the treaty . Two Jewish historians explain the treaty and the war : Goodman and (French jewess) Addas Lebel. It’s there for everyone to read. It s a pitty Kevin Mac Donald hasn’t used ancient history to study the JQ.

    • Replies: @tomo
  54. Moi says:
    @anarchyst

    Ah, but Jesus was a Jew, and he said he’d come to uphold Jewish law.

  55. @carsondyal

    Had to grin as I read your post. I’ve had the same kind of friendship with someone in LA for decades. My friend is a highly intelligent, very articulate and motivated Jew who adopted Buddhism many years ago and even achieved fluency in Japanese. We share a common interest in music, books and philosophy. We still kept in touch after I left LA, and over the years he has sent me some of the most profound emails sharing his insights into self-awareness, zazen meditation, the need for compassion and especially the dangers of ego and self-delusion.

    And yet I’ve asked him many times, for example, how he is able to reconcile his Buddhist quest for compassion with Israel’s quest to genocide Palestinians, and he invariably goes blank or uses a diversionary argument.

    There seems to be some kind of psychopathic wall Jews are incapable of crossing if it means having to hold another Jew responsible for their actions.

    • Replies: @Chensley
  56. I’m not an European or a Jew and I’ve not even met, in real life, that many Jews. I have absolutely no tolerance for generalised bigotry – I won’t say racism, that’s just part of bigotry – against any group, religious or ethnic. But I will say that I have never encountered, in all my years online, any people more obsessed with finding reasons to cast themselves in the role of victims than the Jews.

    Let’s take one example. I’m a fan of the fiction of HP Lovecraft and a reader (and writer) of Lovecraftian fiction. Among the sites I visit routinely is a page on Tor.com called The Lovecraft Reread where two women writers each week review a piece of Lovecraftian fiction, or more precisely what they consider Lovecraftian fiction. One of these two women, Ruthanna Emrys, is Jewish, and she’s always looking to find a Jew in any piece of fiction, no matter how far-fetched the identification might be.

    For instance, the two of them reviewed, a few weeks ago, George RR Martin’s novella Sandkings. The plot involves a far future universe in which space travel is commonplace, and an extremely unpleasant protagonist, Simon Kress, buys four colonies of an alien life form (the titular Sandkings) to pit against each other in gladiatorial battles. He buys them from a woman called Jala Wo who is described as exotic looking and wears a kind of skullcap.

    Purely on the basis of this passing reference to a skullcap, Emrys posited that Jala Wo was Jewish.

    “Part of it is the Mysterious Shoppe, a trope I do enjoy in spite of myself. This one, like all too many, has a Jewish proprietor—or at least, Kress makes a point of mentioning Wo’s “strange little cap that rested well back on her head,” which sure sounds like a yarmulke to me. This is even less reasonable in late 70s space opera than 1840s gothic fluff, but I still want to know how a nice Jewish girl gets one of these franchises.”

    I used to think we Bengalis were the world champions at inventing reasons to feel persecuted and sorry for ourselves. No, the Jews have us beaten hollow at that game.

  57. Greg Bacon says: • Website

    Maybe Juden didn’t poison wells during those Middle Ages plague breakouts. A good reading of actual history and not the crap taught in schools would let the reader understand that when it comes to killing Goyim, Jews enjoy doing the dirty work with a pistol, club, knife, bayonet and machine gun, as those Germans in the East found out when the Bolshevik Jew led Red Army moved back westward. Along with raping around 2 million German women, from age 8-80, then killing many of them after multiple rapes.
    Now days, they can whack the Goyim from a distance and then scream anti-Semitism when people find out what’s been going on:

    Trillions of viruses in the world, and Israel just happened to be working on a COVID vaccine
    ?
    Such luck! Almost as lucky as those Mossad assets who were caught in New Jersey filming the WTC attacks and celebrating while doing so.

    Israeli Scientists Claim It’s ‘Pure Luck’ They Were Already Working On A COVID-19 Vaccine Prior To The Outbreak

    Israeli scientists are on the cusp of developing the first vaccine against the novel coronavirus, according to Science and Technology Minister Ofir Akunis. If all goes as planned, the vaccine could be ready within a few weeks and available in 90 days, according to a release.

    https://christiansfortruth.com/israeli-scientists-claim-its-pure-luck-they-were-already-working-on-a-covid-19-vaccine-prior-to-the-outbreak/

    In 1998 Israeli Jews were caught developing ethnic bioweapons:

    https://www.wired.com/1998/11/israels-ethnic-weapon/

    My guess is that on the ethnic bio-weapons, the work was slowed down when they realized that nearly all so called Israel Jews DO NOT have any Jewish blood in them, as their ancestors were from eastern Europe and western Russia.

  58. @AaronB

    I’m totally against the demonization of Christian European populations, …
    It can’t be denied that Christianity began as hostile to Judaism…

    Stop demonizing Christian European populations. Christianity never hated the Jews, the Jews always hated the Christians. Christianity began in the face of hostile Judaism.

    Notice that Jews are absolute liars. Their culture is a kind of mass insanity, totally irrational, so they always lie to justify or defend it, and here we have Aaron the liar.

    Medieval Europe was not a religiously tolerant society. Correct. But a deeply degenerate Christianity is not Christianity. You just jumped a thousand years.

  59. @Gleimhart Mantooso

    “…Christians just wanted the Jews and the pagans to leave them alone…”

    Christians consisted of converted Jews and Pagans. They fanatically tried to convert everyone. One has only to read about the riot St Paul created in Ephesus to get an idea how much of a nuisance they were. See : Acts 19: 23-41.

  60. anarchyst says:
    @Moi

    Jesus was of the Essene sect, a jewish sect that abhorred Pharasaic practices and had many Christian-like beliefs.

  61. @Greg Bacon

    On the contrary. They discovered that there were no great genetic differences between Jews and Arabs, which disproves the “Khazar” theory.

    • Replies: @bjondo
  62. @Irish Savant

    A splendid guy in every respect he’s nonetheless totally and utterly unwilling to ever concede Jewish wrong-doing on anything. Not even 1% culpability. The shutters come down. It’s truly amazing.

    Judaism is narcissistic personality disorder turned into a supermacist cult.

    Let’s see what the symptomatic traits of Narcissistic Personality Disorder are.. copy from Wikipedia:

    1. Grandiosity with expectations of superior treatment from other people; (“We are God-chosen and we have a special mission!”)

    2. Lack of empathy for the negative impact they have on the feelings, wishes, and needs of other people; (“Non-Jews were made by HaShem to serve Jews”)

    3. Fixation on fantasies of power, success, intelligence, attractiveness, etc.; (“When the Messiah come we will rule the whole World, right now we only rule part of it!”)

    4. Self-perception of being unique, superior, and associated with high-status people and institutions; (associated with God himself!)

    5. Need for continual admiration from others;

    6. Sensitive to criticism (Antisemitism!!!!)

    7. Intense envy of others, and the belief that others are equally envious of them (“The goyim hate us so we must hate them!”, “The goyim plan to kill us so we must plan to kill them!” and other typical projections)

    etc…

    • Replies: @Anon
  63. Anonymous[168] • Disclaimer says:

    Back in the late 1960s a philosophy fellow could say to a bunch of young Jews he was drinking and arguing with, who were bellyaching about this persecution nonsense, “Don’t you Jews think you’ve done something wrong”? To this day they can’t answer this straightforward question because the whole damn lie immediately unravels.

    My grandfather’s best friend in NYC, who grew up speaking Yiddish, used to laugh that every Jew is brought up from his mother’s knee thinking that goys will hate him because “you’re so much smarter than they are.” Now, anyone who’s worked with them for any length of time can attest to the fact that this is absurd, and as well that the attitude of strongly identified Jews amounts to “We Jews shit on you Christians”—as if any further proof is needed than the power they’ve just exercised over Congress and President Trump in handing them $trillions in no-interest/no-liability credit to buy up what they don’t already own.

    What is striking about their power is not so much their very impressive business acumen and aggressiveness but the nature and breadth of the capitulation by goys in government who’re chosen behind closed doors by Jewish operatives for possessing that abject cowardice posing as principle that’s been Jewish power’s sine qua non. Specifically, Forbes ran several articles last November exposing the billionaire Jews who own which members of Congress, starting with McConnell and Graham, for example, who like the rest answer to Jewish interests and no other.

    Given that “irrational hatred” arising in envy is an absurd canard on the face of it—show me one work remotely envious of the Jews—, it follows, then, that calling criticism of the collective acts of Jews hate speech intentionally suppresses the hidden premise that Jews acting collectively have never and can never do anything wrong. I believe this unmentionable premise has now been surreptitiously made law in Florida, whose present governor flew his cabinet to Israel to conduct his administration’s first day of business in what must be one of the most disgusting acts of groveling capitulation to Jewish power in American history.

  64. @Tom

    People who comment on this website come from all over the world. Are you afraid the ADL will arrest the whole world?

    • Replies: @Tom
  65. utu says:
    @Wielgus

    https://jewishcurrents.org/may-4-jews-and-the-hussite-wars/
    The Hussites were viewed as a “Judaizing sect” by Church authorities because of their embrace of the Old Testament, their rejection of religious saints and icons, and their criticisms of the Church hierarchy and corruption. “There were no direct attacks by the Hussites on the Jews,” writes the Jewish Virtual Library, “although they incidentally became victims of the Hussites, as after the capture of Chomutov (Komotau) in 1421, where Jews were burned at the stake together with the Catholics… and in Prague (in 1422) [where] the Jewish quarter was plundered along with the Old City. However, these attacks were incidental to attacks on Catholics.” Many Jews were sympathetic to the Hussites, and were accused of supplying arms to them; “on that account [they] suffered massacres and expulsions at the hands of the Catholics …”

  66. Greg Bacon says: • Website

    That’s not true Frankie, as DNA studies show Palestinian DNA going back to the Bronze Age, back in 3,000 BCE.
    What Jew DNA is in Israel is mostly from Persia.

    • Replies: @Franklin Ryckaert
  67. Anonymous[798] • Disclaimer says:
    @Wielgus

    I have met Kazakhs and they have epicanthic eyefolds, flat faces and look like Mongolians.

    Yup, I met a lot of Kazakhs who were living and working in Beijing, and smaller cities.

    One time a Chinese friend of mine tried conversing with a Kazakh acquaintance. The Kazakh tried to answer in his broken Chinese, and the other guy was puzzled like you wouldn’t believe. He turned to me to ask “He’s not . . . from around here?”

    I actually had to draw a crude map for the Chinese dude to explain where Kazakhstan was in relation to China. I was chuckling as I did so.

    • Replies: @Really No Shit
  68. One wonders if, decades or centuries from now, Jewish historians will lament the persistence of antisemitism by explaining that Europeans once “irrationally” blamed the Jews for COVID-19. As evidence, perhaps they’ll point to some excerpts from 8chan and argue that this was the belief of “the masses.”

    From the horse’s mouth:

    Netanyahu uses clip from TV show claiming it was virus-hit Iran
    PM shows a viral video from 2007 American mini-series to his ministers during a cabinet meeting, while making an assertion that Iranian authorities have been hiding the real number of coronavirus-related fatalities

    https://www.ynetnews.com/article/r1DQvQQv8#autoplay

    What else is new, oh I forgot Iran is developing nuclear bombs….

  69. Anonymous[798] • Disclaimer says:
    @EnslavedGoy

    Yitzhak Attia:

    we are engaged in close
    combat between Israel and the Nations – and it can only be genocidal and total
    because it is about our and their identities.

    This is honestly mind-boggling.

    There are peoples in the world who have maintained their identities intact for at least as long as the Jews (ex. the Persians – modern Iranians) or indeed longer than the Jews (ex. the Chinese, the Hindus) who do not see their existence as “destroy or be destroyed”.

    It seems the Jewish view has become a self-fulfilling prophecy: their very self-conception as a persecuted people, and their subsequent desire for retribution in all ways large and small, has resulted in them being all the more shunned, and so on and so forth, in an eternal vicious cycle.

    The only way forward is to break the cycle. How that’ll happen . . . beats me.

    • Agree: tomo
  70. Catdomnj says:
    @Irish Savant

    But understand this. In a pinch, they all revert. You’re,like the guy that says ” but my Black friend is different. He even helped me with….”. But how loyal is that friend when push comes to shove? That’s when you find out your friend has no loyalty to you. In a pinch, they all revert.

    • Agree: Fuerchtegott
    • Replies: @anarchyst
  71. cranc says:

    …COVID-19, which has already claimed the lives of two ultra-orthodox Jews in London.

    Reading that, I thought I wonder how old they were? So clicked the link:
    The deceased are Rina Feldman, 97, and Willi (Zev) Stern, 85.

    Struck down in the prime of life ! Their lives ‘claimed by COVID19’ !

    Ditto Ditto

    • Replies: @Druid
  72. @Greg Bacon

    “…The closest genetic neighbors to most Jewish groups were the Palestinians, Israeli Bedouins, and Druze in addition to the Southern Europeans, including Cypriots,” as Ostrer and Skorecki wrote in a review of their findings that they co-authored in the journal Human Genetics in October 2012…”

    Source : Haaretz, Oct 20, 2015 : Blood Brothers : Palestinians and Jews Share Genetic Roots.

    • Replies: @Greg Bacon
  73. Catdomnj says:
    @Moi

    You can’t see the difference in the idea of “American exceptionalism” and the tribe’s prophecies and mission of “world domination”?
    Cmon Abe, you know the difference.

    • Replies: @Franklin Ryckaert
  74. @Sam J.

    The real question is, why even interact.
    U either talk to a jew or to an idiot falling for the jewish glamour spell.
    There’s a reason why they call themself after jewelry.

  75. @Wielgus

    Only the dumb asses were taken in by Borat crap for all STANs are of Mongolian descent and the only borats were the Jews … Lev Leviev, one of the biggest diamond dealers in the world is a Bukharan Jew.

  76. @Catdomnj

    And the USA’s 800 military bases around the world, and its numerous CIA orchestrated coups have nothing to do with its ambition to world domination? In many ways, the USA is Judea writ large.

  77. @Anonymous

    My neighborhood has Uzbeks and a lot of Chinese but the locals know who is who because the former are all beefy (ready to kick ass) and the latter are almost all lanky … ready to receive that kick in the ass, in case the shit hits the fan!

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  78. anarchyst says:
    @Catdomnj

    You are correct. Jews and blacks ALWAYS revert to their particular strain of DNA. Their behavior is hard-wired in to their DNA and cannot be changed or modified.

    Jews have a “persecution complex” which they use to good advantage to disarm those who see through their falsehoods and inherent dishonesty. They hide behind insularity and nepotism, but only for themselves while forcing “multiculturalism and diversity” on the societies that they infect.

    Jews see persecution under every rock, using it to their advantage to enforce group solidarity and to discourage fellow jews from thinking for themselves, “outside the box“. They are parasites that infect every society that they infiltrate.

    Blacks have a “slavery complex” in which “the white man” is blamed for all of their shortcomings. No matter how much they try, they will never be the equal of whites or asians.

    Blacks see their own shortcomings and lower IQ as being caused by slavery and the white man, without recognizing that slavery was a part of the human condition for all ethnic groups, not just blacks. Every ethnic group (but jews and blacks) has gotten away from the “blame game” and excuses that slavery caused their present dysfunctional behavior.

    It is the jews who used the blacks to promote social instability in the united States of America by spearheading the so-called “civil-rights (for some)” movement in the united States. There used to be a saying among those of us who opposed forced (false) “civil-rights (for some” actions: “Behind every negro there is a jew“. It is FACT that almost every “civil-rights (for some)” worker was a jew and used blacks for their own advantage.

    Both jews and blacks suffer from mental illness.

    The best course of action is to isolate them from each other (and from us) and to deport them to their points of origin. In any case, land that is procured for them must be devoid of an indigenous population, in order to avoid conflicts. Wall off these “jews only” and “blacks only” areas, strictly controlling emigration from their respective “countries“.

  79. TGD says:

    History professor Alfred E. Cornebise stated regarding American efforts in the town of Wlodowa (Poland) in the 1920s:
    … further difficulties were in the form of considerable resistance among the population to bathe…

    Stupidity and superstition were rife within the ultra orthodox enclaves in Eastern Europe. Inbreeding promotes feebleness. Not to excuse this despicable behavior but it was not only Jews who didn’t believe in bathing. Below is a clip from the 1968 movie, “Bandolero,” in which actor Dub Taylor expounds on bathing. Did the movie have a Jewish script writer?

  80. tomo says:
    @Pheasant

    I have had a similar experience.
    As soon as you say anything against Israel (or god forbid if you disapprove of just nuking Iran for no reason) – your jewish ‘friends’ will not like you any more.
    They may not say it explicitly, but they will turn all passive aggressive against you .
    But that’s a good thing – since nobody needs such fake friends anyway.
    I know hundreds of jews and have never heard any of them disapprove of anything Israel does – at the contrary – they always complain how Arabs don’t want to just give them more land – because Israel is so small.
    First I thought this was a joke – but then I realized it’s not.
    It truly is a ‘culture’ as a predatory PSYCHOPATH
    When I read books on psychopaths – my jewish friends came to my mind. then I connected the dots to realize their whole ‘culture’ is structured that way

  81. tomo says:
    @Bruno

    what you say reminds me ow how Emperor Hadrian described Jews in this book

    as far as I remember he described them as being extremely irrational, blindly vindictive and poisoning their own wells I think.
    It’s a great book – worth reading.
    I remember how shocked he was with Jewish violence and morbidity

  82. S says:

    Anyone confronting mainstream Jewish historiography for the first time is overwhelmed by the victim paradigm inherent in most scholarship, a key part of which is the idea that Jews have been irrationally scapegoated countless times over many centuries.

    Great article.

    The below excerpt was published in the then hugely influential ‘progressive’ US establishment journal The Atlantic Monthly (now simply The Atlantic) in 1870, and was part of an article entitled ‘Our Israelitish Brethren’. In more modern English the title would translate as ‘Our Jewish Brothers’.

    Though it’s writer Parton was presumably Anglo-Saxon, an explanation (in part) for the article title might be found in British Israelism, the unfortunate idea held by some powerful elements of the Anglo-Saxon elites and hangers on that they were of the Lost Tribes of Israel, rather than of the forests of northern Europe.

    Andersonville is a reference to the highly emotional accusations made at the end of the Civil War by the North against the South in regards to the Union POW’s, ie ones involving ‘camps’, ‘cattle cars’, leather wallets manufactured from the human skin of the ‘murdered’ Union prisoners, the claim that a humanitarian health measure put in place to preserve the lives and well being of Union prisoners, vaccination against disease, was in reality but a cleverly disguised instrument of mass murder, ie ‘poisonous injections’, and songs written after the war exhorting to ‘never forget’, etc, etc.

    ‘Andersonville’ was the name of one location Union POW’s were held in the South. Conditions for POW’s held in both the North and South were not nearly what they should of been, the resulting high losses in sickness and death being roughly comparable for both sides during the war.

    ‘Of the giant wrongs to which they [the Jewish people] have been subjected for the last ten centuries,—the huge Andersonville outrages,—few readers need to be reminded.’

    The Atlantic Monthly (October, 1870) – Our Israelitish Brethren

    Our Israelitish brethren are now subjected to a trial peculiar to themselves. From being persecuted everywhere, they are beginning to be honored and sought..

    ..Who can estimate the reparation which Christendom owes this interesting and unoffending people? How abundant, how untiring, should be our charity in judging the faults of character which our own superstition has created or developed!

    Of the giant wrongs to which they have been subjected for the last ten centuries,—the huge Andersonville outrages,—few readers need to be reminded.

    (cont.)

    In the slaughter of the Jews of Seville, in 1391, thirty-five hundred families were murdered. In 1492, under Ferdinand and Isabella, three hundred thousand heroic Israelites preferred exile to apostasy. Many of them found a resting-place only in the grave or in the depths of the sea; for neither Portugal nor Italy nor Mohammedan Morocco would tolerate the presence of a people who would not comply with their superstitions, and who, by their frugality, continence, temperance, and industry, absorbed the wealth of every country in which they lived.

    Those who remained in the Peninsula suffered baptism, and were obliged to conform to the outward observances of the reigning church. Far more enviable was the lot of those who had accepted banishment. The favorite office of the Spanish Inquisition for two centuries was to “question” the sincerity of those two hundred thousand Jewish converts; and the national amusement was to witness the burning of Jewish Rabbis and Jewish maidens. Similar atrocities were committed, as we all know, in England, Germany, and France.

    https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/1870/10/our-israelitish-brethren/306257/

  83. @Franklin Ryckaert

    Source : Haaretz, Oct 20, 2015 : Blood Brothers : Palestinians and Jews Share Genetic Roots.

    Yes, I’m sure an Israeli rag would give us Goyim the truth. Try this on for size, it’s a bit meaty, but proves what I’ve said about Palestinian DNA going back to 3,000 BCE and most Israelis descending from eastern European and western Russia, with the small amount of actual Jew DNA coming from Persia.

    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5003663/

    I know it’s painful to find out that most Jews are descended from Khazaria, since Khazarians were phallic worshipers, but history can be mean, that’s why some keep lying about what happened in the recent past.

    Say, are you the same Franklin Ryckaert that wrote this?

    FRANKLIN RYCKAERT: WHY I AM AN ANTI-SEMITE

    https://www.darkmoon.me/2014/why-i-am-an-anti-semite-by-franklin-ryckaert/

    • Agree: Ann Nonny Mouse
    • Replies: @Franklin Ryckaert
  84. Truth3 says:
    @AaronB

    Still, it can’t be denied that Christianity began as hostile to Judaism, in that it basically saw itself as replacement to Judaism and Jews who refused to convert as liars on the side of the Devil.

    Oh, Jesus, isn’t that rich…

    Jews are liars… Truth. Jesus said so.

    Jews are hypocrites… Truth. Jesus said so.

    Jews are murderers… Truth. Jesus said so.

    Jews are sons of Satan… Truth. Jesus said so.

    Hostile?

    Ever hear the term? “For Fear of the Jews” Yeah, it has Truth behind it.

    Ever hear what Saul of Tarsus was doing?

    St. Stephen, anyone?

    Remember, Christ was calling them liars and hypocrites and murderers and sons of Satan to their faces… well, sounds about right to me.

    Burn in Hell AaronB.

    • Agree: Ann Nonny Mouse
    • Replies: @Fuerchtegott
  85. @tomo

    “…I know hundreds of jews and have never heard any of them disapprove of anything Israel does…”

    You will find a different kind of Jews here :

    1) http://www.mondoweiss.net, an American Jew, highly critical of Zionism.

    2) http://www.btselem.org, an Israeli human rights organization.

    3) Haaaretz, a leftwing Israeli newspaper, openly criticising Israeli crimes of past and present.

    So such Jews do really exist.

    • Replies: @jbwilson24
    , @tomo
  86. Tom says:
    @Franklin Ryckaert

    Not at all, though I think you misread my post.

  87. @anarchyst

    Well Doh!!

    It’s completely understandable that the Jews have a mortal fear of ‘Showers & Soap’ after all that fanatical hygienist uncle Adolf in a fit of hygienic rage turned 3 million of them into soap & pushed the other 3 million into showers & forced them to use the newly created soap, those unlucky people perished in the showers out of Hygienic shock – Goldberg died lathering himself with Silverberg.

    And you have the nerve to criticize Jews for their aversion towards Soap & Showers – what an anti-semite.

    • LOL: Malla
    • Replies: @Grahamsno(G64)
  88. Did Trump have advance notice of the Coronavirus/COVID-19 psyop ? As someone has pointed out at reddit/conspiracies his tweet of “covfefe” was not a spelling mistake and it likely refers to COVID-19 . COV is a way of referring to a coronavirus and fefe is a hydragenase and “…has been used in processes for the creation of bacterium ,RNA or viral strands ” When Trump made his “covfefe” tweet in 2017 Sean Spicer ,, his press secretary at the time ,confirmed it was not a mistake and it’s meaning was known “to a small group of people” Also fefe in gematria/kabbalah amounts to 65 65 or 11 11 , significant numbers.

    • Replies: @9/11 Inside job
  89. Wally says:
    @carsondyal

    said:
    “With notable exceptions like Miko Peled, Norman Finkelstein, Ron Unz and others, Jews always seem to think of themselves as the victims, never the victimizers”

    – Just ask them for proof of their claimed victimization. You get nothing that passes the science & smell tests.

    BTW:
    – Fraud Finkelstein claims his parents are “holocaust survivors” yet has no proof. As is the case with all “holocau$t survivors”.

    • Replies: @ivan
  90. @Pheasant

    ” She eventually realised that just because these Jews were indulging/using her over black civil rights did not mean they were her friends- thier Jewish tribalism was merely hidden and disguised behind universalist talk which evaporated the moment Jewish interests were threatened.”

    Funny, Malcolm X came to the same conclusion. You can find juicy quotes from him on how Jewish support for black causes is ultimately nothing more than self interest.

    It’s always amusing to me to see black civil rights types failing to notice that Jews provided the backbone of the slave trade, most of the anti-black culture in theatre/movies/TV (e.g., blackface), etc etc. A few Gene Hackman movies about the Jewish role fighting the KKK and all of that is forgotten.

    No matter how liberal and chill, a Jewish person instantly turns into a rabid attack dog at the slightest hint of criticism. They are your ‘friends’ until you disagree with them, in particular about Israel, Jewish culture, WW2 history, Jewish power, etc.

    There is no such thing as a Jewish ally. Look at how they treat Christian fundamentalists, who provide unwavering support for Israel. Pew research studies show that Jews despise fundamentalists, and no Jewish leader has thought to show gratitude by asking liberal Jews to tone down the production of pornography, anti-Christian art, etc etc.

  91. @Franklin Ryckaert

    It’s interesting that your list of examples are all relatively inaccessible to gentiles. Mondoweiss will ban anyone who is TOO critical of Jewish culture or Zionism. It’s an insiders club. Haaretz is fine, but it’s an Israeli paper.

    Jews permit other Jews to criticize Jewish behaviour, but criticism by gentiles is not allowed.

    • Agree: tomo
  92. tomo says:
    @Franklin Ryckaert

    Thank you
    I was talking about the ones I’ve met in LA, SF and DC

  93. meena says:
    @AaronB

    1 How do you explain the current concentrations of the Jewish people in the banking ,media and in the courts of the powerful: Judiciary,Pentagon, Senate and Congress? How do you explain the unceasing efforts of using those positions to feather their own nests in UK USA France Germany Canada Australia and in Israel at the cost of the poor citizen and using the same positions to poison the wells of Iran Syria and Palestine?

    2 Above all in this age of irreligiousity and secularism , how do you explain the constant focus on the religion by the Jews to explain their behaviors and rights to those behaviors ( we were tortured because of faith. We had right to land because God says so ) ? If anti semitism were the proud of some religious faith , won’t the constant fear of antisemitism now should cease ? It doesn’t It keeps on growing in the marvelous world of the ADL. Those data are avidly followed and acted on by the other Jewish agencies. May be antismetism had always little to do with faith than it had with the realties .

    3 If religion shapes Jewish responses to non Jewish people , the non jewish religion will shape the reaction to the Jews .

    • Replies: @anarchyst
  94. @Greg Bacon

    Haaretz is not a “rag”, it is an influencial and respected liberal Israeli newspaper (founded in 1918), very well capable of harsh criticism of its own country. Its Alexa ranking is 8,458.

    I’d rather call myself a “Judeo-critic” than using the (incorrect) term “anti-Semite”. That means that I criticize negative Jewish mentality and behavior, but that does not mean that I consider all Jews as bad and all information that comes from Jews as false. Things are always nuanced, even about Jews.

    We can both provide links that “prove” either side of the debate about the Khazar hypothesis, but if your criterion is : “everything said by a Jew is false”, then that would defy your own argument because there are also Jews on the side of the Khazar hypothesis : Arthur Koestler, Benjamin Freedman and the Israelis Shlomo Sand and Elhaik.

    For a critique of Elhaik, see Wikipedia, Khazar hypothesis of Ashkenazi Ancestry, Critisism of the Elhaik study.

    Excerpt :

    “…Elhaik’s 2012 study was specifically criticized for its use of Armenians and Azerbaijani Jews as proxies for Khazars and for using Bedouin and Jordanian Hashemites as a proxy for the Ancient Israelites…”

    In short “scientist” Elhaik compared proxies with proxies. How “scientific” is that?

    The received opinion is that Ashkenazi Jews are the descendants of Jewish men from Palestine who married Italian women and later on formed a closed ethnic group. Then they migrated to the Rhine region where they adopted the local German language and transformed it into Yiddish. All Eastern European Jews are descendants of this group. BTW, Ashkenazi Jews constitute less than half of the Israeli Jewish population.

    If Jews of whatever genetic background had the right to immigrate into Palestine and dispossess the local population in the process is another debate.

    • Replies: @Ann Nonny Mouse
  95. Anonymous[798] • Disclaimer says:
    @Really No Shit

    Chinese were lanky in my neighborhood as well. But my view changed when I lived in mainland China, north of the Yangtze river.

    Can’t really know the ethnic look of people based on who immigrated where.

    Otherwise, real Italians would be shorter, darker complexioned, pretty hairy and with dark North African-style hair. Hollywood stereotype – most Italian immigrants came from Sicily and Calabria.

    Anyone who’s actually been around Italians, in Italy, will tell you that’s plain wrong. Compare Palermo with Rome, big difference.

    When you get to Central China, you’ll notice the Chinese getting bigger (must be all that Mongolian genetics). Not saying they were huge, but definitely not the stereotype. Most overseas Chinese are from the farthest south, close by Vietnam – think Vietnam body type. Shanghai’s a mix.

    Draw your own conclusions.

    • Replies: @Really No Shit
  96. Medieval Christian Europe was not a religiously tolerant society

    Yes, and that is because it was Catholic and it possessed the truth and both the Church and The State worked together.

    Both the Church and the State were perfect societies in that each passed the means to reach its end but owing to original sin it was only a matter of time that such corruption as religious liberty/religious tolerance gained a foothold.

    America is a religious liberty society which means it is indifferent to Truth and Divine Revelation and it legislates in opposition to Jesus Christ who is King of Heaven and Earth

    • LOL: Druid, NoseytheDuke
  97. @AaronB

    In the East, they had an enclave in south India, in Cochin. All were all spice merchants and none were coolies. Same on the merchant ships that took opium to china. They were masters like David Sassoon. Go preach to the American Congress AaronB.

  98. Anon[264] • Disclaimer says:
    @EnslavedGoy

    Considering that their ‘god’ is a crazy-ass histrionic FTM transvestite with Borderline Personality Disorder, it makes perfect sense that they as her chosen children would be badly damaged Collective Narcissists that behave like the adult children of an alcoholic.

    In the interest of fairness, Gentile Zio-Christians behave like crack-whores, so there’s that.

  99. @AaronB

    I haven’t seen semantics tap dance like this since Marc Anthony acknowledged Brutus as “an honorable man” in Act III, Scene II.

  100. Iva says:
    @carsondyal

    I had a Jewish friend, to whom in 2014 I said that is is very sad that Israel treats Palestinians this way. His answer was “they should kill them all”. I was speechless and never talk to him again. I was shocked, how this ethnic group, who suffered so much during WWII, can be so cruel to others, just like Nazis. I have to admit that, after my friend statement,  my compassion to Jews’ suffering in WWII just disappear. 

    • Agree: Kolya Krassotkin
    • Replies: @Angharad
  101. @9/11 Inside job

    “covfefe”=Coronavirus/COVID-19 , was Trump told of the Coronavirus psyop in 2017?

  102. @Franklin Ryckaert

    Christians consisted of converted Jews and Pagans.

    News flash!

    They fanatically tried to convert everyone. One has only to read about the riot St Paul created in Ephesus to get an idea how much of a nuisance they were.

    Christians have never tried to convert everyone, as they know that the vast majority of humanity is going to hell.

    And your idea of nuisance means hearing anything you don’t want to hear. Jews and pagans tried to kill off the Christians, and the Lord said, “Nah. Don’t think so.”

    Christians—the real kind—don’t take orders from Jews and pagans. Get over it already.

    • Replies: @Franklin Ryckaert
    , @Druid
  103. mcohen says:
    @Tom

    Lol.called a roach roast.

    • Replies: @Tom
  104. @Moi

    Ah, but Jesus was a Jew, and he said he’d come to uphold Jewish law.

    “Jewish law”? No. Mosaic law. (And no, they are not one and the same.)

    “Uphold”? No. Fulfill.

    Moreover, Jesus was emphatic in teaching that being the physical seed of Abraham didn’t mean a thing. That’s why they hate him to this day.

    • Agree: Robert Dolan
  105. @Grahamsno(G64)

    A total lack of sense of Humor – bunch of humor challenged retards

  106. Wally says:
    @Franklin Ryckaert

    said:
    “According to the Talmud, Jews are the only species of homo sapiens. Non-Jews are cattle-in-human-form, especially created to serve the Jews.With such an attitude, sanctified by their religion, conflicts with the whole world are inevitable. But of course, in each conflict, the world is always wrong, never the Jews!”

    – Franklin, you’re bullshitting us.

    – You are on record, numerous times, at this site as claiming that millions of “never wrong “Jews were killed / ‘holocausted’ by ‘the Nazis’, yet you cannot present any proof whatsoever. But no matter, to hell with proof, you just keep at it anyway.

    – You’re fooling no one in your sheeps clothing.

  107. @Wally

    The Canonical History tells us that at least 1.6 million died in the action Reinhard camps I defy you to tell me the names of 10K people or at least 1K names I bet you can’t. You CAN’T

    Tell me the names of the Survivors of Belzec, Sobibor and Treblinka, I bet you cant.

    • Replies: @Wally
  108. @Gleimhart Mantooso

    “…Christians have never tried to convert everyone…”

    If that is true, Christianity would never have become a world religion, and the biggest at that.

    “…as they know that the vast majority of humanity is going to hell…”

    Well, then the Christian message doesn’t sound much like an “evangel”, from Greek euangelion “good message”.

    “…Jews and pagans tried to kill off the Christians, and the Lord said, “Nah. Don’t think so…”

    The Roman Empire was a multi-ethnic, multi-religious entity. All its citizens were allowed to practice their own religions, provided they were loyal to the Empire. For this they had to make once a year a libation-offering to the emperor. But for the Chritians this was idolatry and they refused to do so. Thus they were persecuted, not for their religion but for their disloyalty. Besides, the Christians hoped for the imminent collapse of the world order, which increased the suspicion of their disloyalty even more.

    Fanatics, not the tolerant win in history. Ultimately the fanatical Christians won and as soon as they attained power they started to persecute the pagans, and the rest, as they say, is history.

    Christianity has its good points, but tolerance is not part of that.

    • Replies: @Gleimhart Mantooso
    , @ivan
  109. @Pheasant

    She eventually advised reading the talmud

    Michael Hoffman has extracted all the pertinent parts for our perusal.

    If you can read past the half-way mark in his book your attention span is longer than mine. This book is brutal to read.

  110. @Wally

    I do not claim that “millions of Jews were holocausted by the Nazis”. I say that millions were abducted (which cannot be denied) and that their fate cannot be accounted for by the revisionists. What happened to them I do not know.

    I neither believe that the Jews were “never wrong”, nor that the Nazis were “never wrong”, which seems to be a kind of religion to you. History is never black and white. Few people seem to understand that.

    • Replies: @BrokenheartAmerican
  111. Never heard about wells being poisoned during the black plague. I have read about Palestinian wells being poisoned, and the Israelis doing it.

  112. @Anonymous

    One of the neighborhood that abuts mine is the old Bensonhurst which used to be largely Italian where you see both, the northern types with blue eyes and tall as well as Calabresis and Napolitano who are largely of shorter stature and swarthy.

    And of course, there are Chinese who come from the north with Manchu and Mongolian blood who are tall but most tend to be slim (may be it’s diet).

    But your point well taken that one can’t and ought not to generalize!

  113. @Franklin Ryckaert

    “…Christians have never tried to convert everyone…”

    If that is true, Christianity would never have become a world religion, and the biggest at that.

    There is no logic to that statement. Moreover, it is the power of God that can bless Christianity or punish it, both of which he has done, is doing, and will continue to do.

    “…as they know that the vast majority of humanity is going to hell…”

    Well, then the Christian message doesn’t sound much like an “evangel”, from Greek euangelion “good message”.

    It’s only Good News for those who don’t reject Christ.

    As for your “Roman Empire… ” cherry-picked and part factually incorrect whirlwind history tour, I’ve heard that godless blame-shifting narrative before.

    Christianity has its good points, but tolerance is not part of that.

    Intolerance is actually one of Christianity’s best features. And if Christians had never lost that beautiful intolerance, White countries could have avoided the plagues that are currently upon them. And by plagues, I mean certain peoples, and certain types of people, and the filth, destruction and degeneracy that come with them.

    • Agree: BrokenheartAmerican
  114. Bookish1 says:

    Is not feminism, the sexual revolution and many other movements inspired by jews poison in the body of our nation? How did we end up a sick society that we have become if not being poisoned by all those nefarious movements.

    • Replies: @Grahamsno(G64)
  115. Bookish1 says:
    @Moi

    If jesus was a jew then jews would never have turned him over to the Roman’s to be crucified. They would never turn one of their own over to gentiles to be tried and crucified.

  116. @Truth3

    One of the worst is Gilad Atzmon, putting himself in one line with Jesus and claims unironically the baptized man Jesus was a jew!

  117. @Pheasant

    A guy/gal standing next to you at a bus stop is not ‘your’ friend, it’s a guy/gal standing next to you at a bus stop.

    A true friend will always be there for you, hence the limited amount of true friends one encounters throughout one’s life.

    Even when those numbers are limited [in my case], it’s so good to have real friends though.

    “We got that guy on a cross and killed, but you’re to blame and have to feel guilty about it!” The Jewish spiel in a nutshell.

    I think that’s where everything went off the rails.

    Disclaimer: I’m a board certified heretic .

  118. @Franklin Ryckaert

    So why (before their modern mass migrations west) were there massively more Jews in Lithuania / Poland / Ukraine / greater Crimea than in France and Germany near the Rhine? Where is the evidence of mass migration eastward?

    Received opinion? Ha, ha! Following the pogroms by three renegade Crusader divisions at the time of the First Crusade the Jews who had fled returned to their homes, according to historians. Is there evidence that at the time of the Black Death they did not, that there was mass flight to Poland? No.

    The Ashenazim of the East originated where they were later found, in the East, just where one would expect the Khazars to have gone under waves of Russian attacks.

    Askenaz, grandson of Japheth, is introduced at Genesis 10.3. Following the Flood there were no humans left in Europe. Askenaz and his descendants repopulated Europe, according to the rabbis who were proselytizing all of Europe from 300 BC and for centuries onward. The rabbis pointed out to the proselytes that they had a place in the Bible, they were Askenazim. Anywhere in Europe they were Ashkenazim.

    All modern Jews originated outside Palestine. There was no expulsion of Jews from there. There is no Diaspora. The Hebrews of Canaan became the Palestinian Muslims.

    • Replies: @Franklin Ryckaert
  119. Wally says:
    @Grahamsno(G64)

    said: “The Canonical History tells us that at least 1.6 million died in the action Reinhard camps I defy you to tell me the names of 10K people or at least 1K names I bet you can’t. You CAN’T. Tell me the names of the Survivors of Belzec, Sobibor and Treblinka, I bet you cant.

    – I suppose you meant that response for Franklin “millions abducted & missing” Ryckaert.

    – Nonetheless, most of the alleged human remains for the Aktion Reinhard camps allegedly exist here:

    staged Sobibor ‘monument’ / prop supposedly over the remains of 250,000 Jew, actual remains of the alleged 250,000 in fact do not exist.:Laughable “mass grave” at Sobibor in which the date, cause of death, ethnicity has not been determined. LOLAlleged location of Treblinka mass graves / remains of 900,000 Jews according to Treblinka officials, no alleged remains exist.

    • Replies: @Grahamsno(G64)
  120. bjondo says:
    @Franklin Ryckaert

    They discovered that there were no great genetic differences between Jews and Arabs.

    But Yid a different animal. Different from Arab Jew.

    great genetic differences means what?

    Koreans and Irish? Monkeys and humans?

    5 dancing shlomos

  121. The dam wall is cracking, and there’s not a thing the ADL can do to stop it.

    • Replies: @Druid
  122. Get a load of this. We are living IN a Mel Brooks movie.

    • Agree: Druid
    • Replies: @Grahamsno(G64)
    , @Bookish1
  123. @Fuerchtegott

    That’s at best clueless. I admire and thank Gilad Atzmon. Jesus WAS a Jew. His parents wanted him born in Bethelehem of Judaea not Nazareth of Galilee making him in every way a Jew. A big thing in the Gospels, though contradictory of the virgin birth, is his father Joseph’s descent from King David making Jesus king of the Jews.

    PS if a Judaean adopts a different religion he is still a Judaean. The Palestinian Muslims are the only real Jews in the world today. The perpetual liars are perpetual fakes, mostly Aryans.

  124. @Ann Nonny Mouse

    Joseph was a carpenter. Jesus was a working class socialist from the wrong side of the tracks, which was why he was such a threat to the establishment. The “descent from David” is post facto claptrap inserted into the narrative long afterwards.

    • Replies: @Ann Nonny Mouse
  125. @Fuerchtegott

    Jesus was a hundred percent a Jew. All his followers were Jews. Jesus was the leader of a movement within Judaism, which is why he was hauled before the high priests. If he hadn’t been a Jew the Romans, who were at the time tolerant of all religions, would have done nothing to him and the Jews would have had no right to complain against him. Everything about Jesus was Jewish. It took Saul, a man who never met Jesus, to realise that to be a follower of Jesus you didn’t necessarily have to be a Jew.

    For an alleged Christian, you aren’t particularly knowledgeable about the religion, are you?

    • Agree: Ann Nonny Mouse
    • Disagree: thotmonger
    • Replies: @ivan
  126. Druid says:
    @cranc

    I don’t believe the cause of death unless I see the lab results myself. Why is this news? More poor_Jew we are just like you crap!

  127. Druid says:
    @Gleimhart Mantooso

    What revisionist nonsense. Christians forcible converted whole nations. They were brutal to pagans. You’re an idiot pat exellance!

    • Replies: @ivan
  128. Druid says:
    @Change that Matters

    I wish it were, but it not. The ignorance out here is astounding!

  129. ivan says:
    @Wally

    You are a nut. Finkelstein has much more credibility than you.

    • Agree: Grahamsno(G64)
  130. @Fiendly Neighbourhood Terrorist

    Okay, but look at Matthew 1.1–1.17.

    1 The book of the generation of Jesus Christ, the son of David, the son of Abraham.

  131. ivan says:
    @Druid

    Pagans were angels?

  132. @Priss Factor

    Good Lord, what is this thing?

  133. Tom says:
    @mcohen

    ….esplain, Lucy, esplain…

  134. ivan says:
    @Franklin Ryckaert

    There is the little matter of Marcus Aurelius stoically slaughtering the Christians all his life and the cage matches at the Coliseum. I don’t claim that Christians never prosecuted anyone but those who write and worked against them were no angels either. We hear – I should be able to get the links if I try – that some Romans including the emperors were so insatiable in the lust for young boys, that the depopulated entire regions in their search for ‘entertainment’. The pagans were no great shakes, and the best of them, Plato, Aristotle, Plotinus and suchlike have been revered by Christian scholars since the beginning. Whatever the West is, it is the creation of Christianity. There is no way back to paganism.

  135. ivan says:
    @Fiendly Neighbourhood Terrorist

    Not just Saul. The Jerusalem council told the Greek and Roman converts that it was only necessary to avoid food sacrificed to other gods and fornication to be in good standing within the community. St Peter had the dream in connection with a Roman centurion convert, that one was basically allowed to eat anything, ie, there were no food prohibitions or anything special in being a Jew.

  136. @Ann Nonny Mouse

    The Jews of Eastern Europe increased in number due to an extraordinarily high birthrate. Genetic research has found that Ashkenazis descend from a small group of only 350 people some 600 to 800 years ago :

    “…A new study concludes that all Ashkenazi Jews can trace their ancestry to a “bottleneck” of just 350 individuals, dating back to between 600 and 800 years ago.

    The study, published in the Nature Communications journal Tuesday, was authored by Shai Carmi, a computer science professor at Columbia University, and more than 20 medical researchers from Yale, Columbia, Yeshiva University’s Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, Hebrew University of Jerusalem and other institutions…”

    “…An analysis of the gene database shows that the original Ashkenazi Jews were about half European and half Middle Eastern. They lived in the medieval era, about 600 to 800 years ago, according to the analysis – and numbered just 350 or so people…”

    Source : Ashkenazi Jews descend from 350 people, study finds, The Times of Israel, 10 September 2014.

    The Biblical story of Ashkenaz is historically as reliable as the myth about Noah and his 3 sons from whom the whole of humanity would have descended. Ashkenaz is the Hebrew rendering of “Scythian”. The Scythians were a nomadic Iranian tribe that inhabited the steppes of Eastern Europe and Central Asia. The Jews therefore called Eastern Europe “Ashkenaz”. Later on that name was used for the whole of Europe. European Jews were then called “Ashkenazi Jews”, which didn’t mean they were considered as descendants of Ashkenaz.

    • Replies: @Ann Nonny Mouse
  137. @Ann Nonny Mouse

    Might as well say “the son of Noah”. All four Gospels are establishment narratives decided long afterwards, and they all have multiple contradictions. Strip away the claptrap and you’re left with the simple story of a socialist revolutionary reformer who got strung up because the Sanhedrin was terrified of his popularity and his threat to their stranglehold on Judaism and the Temple’s finances.

  138. @tomo

    Turks are similar, my experience in a country that America had infected with Gastarbeiters in 1963.

  139. jsigur says:
    @carsondyal

    “It is far easier to fool people than to get them to understand they have been fooled.”
    This holds true for Jews and gentiles alike; take 911 for instance, the most intelligent of men seem incapable of digesting contrary narrative facts and I assume so because it would discombobulate their worlds to do so. A huge step towards crossing that bridge to allow you to see the truth is in the understanding of how well Jews are able to control messages sent out by the mainstream media. This is done on a variety of levels, by firing insubordinate writers and editors, from attacking economically and through made up facts the reliability of the character of those that would doubt their approved explanations. The Jewish Declaration of War on Germany would have been much less effective but for the threatening of non-Jewish businesses with reprisals if they, too, didn’t go along.

    Tell me, how many critical thinkers keep their silence about the authenticity of this barrage of mass killing events almost always blamed on Nazis or Muslim extremism?
    Of course our side shot themselves in the foot by following leadership who kept mum about the problem while those pointing it out were labeled as tin foil.
    The result of that staying mum has been that the MSM can now simply refer to any white organization with a nationalist base as a terror operation

  140. 96.1234 says:

    to use Hess’s words, “no actual evidence of anti-Jewish pogroms.”

    The ONLY known anti-Jewish “pogrom” in America was said to be the result of the commuting of Leo Frank’s death sentence to life by the Georgia governor in 1915. Their claim was that half the Jewish population was driven out of Atlanta.

    The Nation of Islam’s book LEO FRANK: THE LYNCHING OF A GUILTY MAN (reviewed by Ron Unz, now banned by Amazon) takes 15 pages to prove conclusively that no pogrom, riot, or even a simple assault ever occurred. The pogrom was simply made up by Jewish “historians.”

    • Agree: anarchyst
  141. @Bookish1

    Intolerance is actually one of Christianity’s best features.

    An Auto da fe of the Jews in New York anyone?

  142. @Wally

    The names Wally the names.

    We have the names of thousands or tens of thousands of survivors of Auschwitz but hardly anybody from the AR camps – I more or less believe the revisionist Historians views on Auschwitz but not on the AR camps – if you give me proof that 1.6 million Jews were sent east and magically disappeared from the records – give me the records and I will be in agreement but you can’t so I am forced to believe that they were murdered in these camps. What happened to this huge amount of Jews tell me and give me some proof.

  143. Robjil says:
    @Grahamsno(G64)

    Most went to the Soviet Union. That is why there were so many “Russian” Jews able to immigrate after the end of cold war. Even Jewish sites admit that at least a million Polish Jews went to the Soviet Union during the war years.

    https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/escape-of-jews-from-poland-to-the-soviet-union

    …There is no present and no future for young Jews. They escape for their lives. They get away by different methods: on foot, by auto, train, carts and every other kind of transport. The border is open. The Soviets do nothing to prevent it.* The occupying forces have no fixed system. You can never know what is forbidden and what is allowed. In a word – one day they are lenient and one day severe. It is understandable: Where the heart is harsh and cruel there is no set and fixed system. And, in addition, what one authority permits, the other forbids. At the beginning of the Occupation the border was open. Anybody could cross without written permission, and those who wanted to stand in a queue for three days were not prevented from getting written permission; this stated clearly that the bearer of the letter was permitted to cross the border to Russia with his goods and chattels and that he was authorized to make use of any form of transport. That is what it said in writing. In reality the roads were beset with dangers. According to the “Regulations” persons crossing the border could take only 20 zloty with them. This was a sadistic law that could not be observed. Devices were therefore thought up in order to smuggle larger sums across, and here many failed. People were robbed and beaten on the way and left naked, with everything gone. The Border Guards knew that the blood and the money of the Jews were outside the law. And they dealt with people crossing the border as the spirit moved them. From this time the border-crossers preferred to cross without permission. They had no confidence in the legalisms of the Occupying Power. When they crossed quietly they were more secure. There simply was no refugee who did not take with him a sum of money larger than that which the “Regulations” permitted. And so the “green border” [clandestine border crossing] became known among the refugees, together with the expert guides who earned huge sums from this “trade.”

    It is reliably estimated that more than a million** refugees escaped to Russia. However many came they were still well received. But – where was this great mass of people to go? A small part, particularly those with a trade, have already been moved to the interior of Russia. As to the majority – either they had money with them and could eat, or they had nothing and hungered and thirsted….

    Most people fall for the trap about the numbers of ethnic groups in East Europe before WWII. There was a mass migration of millions of different ethnic group during and after WWII.
    The largest migration in human history was that of the Germanic speaking ethnics, 14 to 16 million, after the WWII, fleeing to the rump Germanies, West and East. From all over of Eastern Europe they fled, most had ancestors who lived for over seven hundred years in this lands in the East Europe – Silesia, Prussia, Sudetenland,Pomerania, and from every Eastern European nation. They walked hundreds of miles, not many had cars. This is documented. Millions died in their journey to the rump Germanies, West and East Germany.

    • Replies: @Grahamsno(G64)
  144. @Robjil

    Thanks, I’ll check this line about Jewish demographics.

  145. Bookish1 says:
    @Priss Factor

    And not only lectured to by that ceature but but paying hard earned money to listen to that psycho

  146. @Franklin Ryckaert

    One problem with that is that they are all Jewish geneticists in Jewish laboratories and their careers are financed by Jewish research grants. They obtain the results they are required to obtain. No double-blind. And you demonstrate that it is highly coordinated, all those Jewish universities. If they had all carried out their own independent research and independently published their own papers the results would be vastly more credible. So why didn’t they? Couldn’t be allowed.

    And you get rather silly when you ignore the literal presence of the name Ashkenaz in the Bible and resort instead to the unsubstantiated hypothesis, indeed the disproved hypothesis that Ashkenazi is Hebrew for Scythian meaning Iranian.

    It’s a funny idea you have come up with, looks like desperate denial. Substantiate, from credible sources, please.

    • Replies: @Franklin Ryckaert
  147. @Hippopotamusdrome

    Republican senators quietly dumped stocks after classified coronavirus briefings, even as Trump officials were urging Americans to buy into the market

    Not only mere senators — there was someone considerably more powerful involved in this scheme. From your link:

    Both lawmakers — Sen, Richard Burr and Sen. Kelly Loeffler — have denied suggestions of wrongdoing in relation to the sales.

    How did Loeffler get to be a senator, anyway? She wasn’t elected:

    Kelly Loeffler was appointed by Georgia Governor Kemp because Loeffler is married to Jeffrey Sprecher; a GOPe party insider, mega-donor, and multi-millionaire CEO of the Intercontinental Exchange (ICE). Jeffrey Sprecher is the founder and CEO of ICE, which now owns the New York Stock Exchange. Kelly Loeffler’s company, the financial platform Bakkt, is a subsidiary of the Intercontinental Exchange.

    Wait — her husband owns the NYSE?

    Yep — you’d think he should know just a little bit about this whole “insider trading” thing.

    How did he happen to buy the NYSE, anyway?

    “Wall Street bankers, particularly Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley, backed him and he launched ICE in 2000 (giving 80 percent control to the two banks…”

    Well that helps. Very charitable of those Wall Street banksters to back him so generously. Was there perhaps some degree of… ethnonarcissism involved?

    Wiki “early life” isn’t saying. But his physiognomy isn’t exactly… uber-goyishe, one might say:

    And he bought an Israeli company that was involved in some kind of electronic derivatives-trading scam.

    And he was invited to speak at a Young Jewish Republicans dinner, so…

    Sounds like a pretty connected guy:

    Conference Call:President Donald Trump and Vice President Mike Pence discussed the market and economic issues with a group of Wall Street investors yesterday, including Third Point’s Dan Loeb, Blackstone’s Steve Schwarzman, Vista Equity’s Robert Smith, Jeffrey Sprecher, CEO of Intercontinental Exchange and chairman of the New York Stock Exchange, and hedge fund manager Paul Tudor Jones.

    And if you look into his connections with BlackRock (aka The Fed/ Treasury Department), Larry Fink, etc. — it gets even more interesting…

  148. @Ann Nonny Mouse

    If your criterion is “Jews always lie”, then you run into problems. One group of Jews says that Jews are not descendants of Khazars. They are Jews, therefore they lie, therefore Jews are descendants of Khazars. But another group of Jews says that Jews are descendants of Khazars. They are Jews, therefore they lie. Therefor Jews are not descendants of Khazars. So which is it?

    As for the name Ashkenaz :

    “…Ashkenaz (Hebrew: אַשְׁכְּנָז) in the Hebrew Bible is one of the descendants of Noah. Ashkenaz is the first son of Gomer, and a Japhetic patriarch in the Table of Nations. In rabbinic literature, the kingdom of Ashkenaz was first associated with the Scythian region, then later with the Slavic territories,[1] and, from the 11th century onwards, with Germany and northern Europe. His name is related to the Assyrian Aškūza (Aškuzai, Iškuzai), a people who expelled the Cimmerians from the Armenian highland of the Upper Euphrates area.[2]

    Medieval Jews associated the term with the geographical area centered on the Rhineland of Western Germany. As a result, the Jewish culture that developed in that area came to be called Ashkenazi, the only form of the term in use today…”

    Source : Wikipedia, Ashkenaz.

    • Replies: @Ann Nonny Mouse
  149. @Franklin Ryckaert

    Okay, but be careful of the last paragraph of that Wikipedia quote. There is a lot of re-invention of history in Jewish writings.

    Don’t trust rabbinic literature.

    It’s far more reasonable to suppose the original meaning of Ashkenazi was simply European and that the early proselytizing rabbis, right back to the Hellenistic era, would inform the proselytes everywhere in Europe, both ends, that they were Ashkenazim.

    It’s vastly less believable that medieval rabbis decided to call existing Jews Japhethites. And only in Western Europe.

    There are surviving early records, Josephus quoting someone a century before himself, and the Hebrew Sibyl a couple of centuries before that, Maccabean era, about the huge numbers of Jews there were everywhere then. According to the latter they filled every continent; the former, they dominated every city, or it was hard to find a city where they didn’t or where there weren’t any. He was quoting a Greek geographer who presumably knew.

    It was the era following following Alexander’s conquests, when the educated from the Atlantic to the Indus Valley spoke or read Greek, when the Septuagint appeared, when a Roman emperor who persecuted Christians wrote his Meditations in Greek, when the Bishop of Rome spoke his sermons in Greek. Proselytizing rabbis crawled all over it. There is a “Woe unto you … hypocrites” passage in Matthew denouncing that aggressive proselytizing.

    The numbers of Jews later dropped. Shahak writes of the time about AD 200 when the Roman Empire gave the top rabbi total power over all Jews in the Empire and the Jewish Dark Age immediately followed. Christians preverved the writings of Flavius Josephus, Philo of Alexandria, the Septuagint, everything else Jewish disappeared. One pre-Hitler German historian who died in Switzerland in 1942, Hans Lietzman, writes in A History of the Early Church (1961 English edition, Lutterworth Press) that Rabbinical Judaism eliminated Hellenistic Judaism, which, dating from an earlier time, was not Talmudic. “Talmudic Jewry destroyed its Greek-Speaking sister, pulled down her buildings, and ploughed up her sites.”

    Just a guess, but that might be the origin of later mentions of six million Jews. Anyway, such giant numbers of Jews living in cities and states were later unknown.

    So, if a thousand years later, when there were Jews all over Europe, rabbis went into Western Europe and told the Jews there that they were Japhethites—well, I don’t believe it.

    • Replies: @NoseytheDuke
  150. “Whether Jews did or did not place bags of poison in European wells strikes me as entirely beside the point.”

    I think this statement is as obtuse as claiming that “Whether Jews did or did spread CV19 to China and Iran strikes me as entirely beside the point”

    Mr. Joyce does bring this important point though:

    “that it was not uncommon for medieval Jewish communities to possess their own private wells and water supply within their walled districts”

    Just as a liar cannot accept that many people live their entire lives telling the truth, so mideaval jews could never believe that Christians would not spend their entire lives not trying to poison gods chosen people.

    The point here is that before Mr. Joyce delves into whether jewish paranoia caused Christian resentment, he should find out if Jews were paranoid because Christian fears were justified. Jews have been expelled from hundreds of countries over the centuries and most of these expulsions were entirely justified, especially because jews were poisoning the wells just as they were ritually draining the blood from Christian children.

    This is an archived thread about Jewish Well Poisoning. Now just consider all the fluoride put into Goyish water systems. Just consider what jews are doing to Palestinian water supplies this very moment.

    This description of Jewish ritual sacrifice of Christian children during the middle ages. Now just consider what jews are doing to Palestinian children, both Christian and Moslem, this very moment.

  151. Truth3 says:
    @Franklin Ryckaert

    They fanatically tried to convert everyone.

    Frantically?

    Really? Are you that much of an ass to describe people who were martyred in overwhelming numbers, mostly by Jews or by Jewish instigation of the Rulers, by denigrating them as “FRANTIC” in their attempts to inform others?

    Up yours dickhead. When you go to Hell and meet those that boiled them in oil, threw them off cliffs, stoned them, impaled them, fed them to wild beasts, crucified them, and flayed them alive, ask those monsters to do the SAME to you, and then we can all see what FRANTIC looks like, as you scream in pain.

    Justice here or Justice there. Take your pick you fuck.

    • Replies: @Franklin Ryckaert
  152. @Truth3

    Can you read? I wrote fanatically (which you quoted correctly), but then you react to it as if I wrote “frantically”.

    As I said, religion in the Roman Empire was free. The only thing the Roman authorities demanded was once a year offering a libation to the emperor as a token of loyalty. The Christians refused that because they considered that as idolatry. The Jews refused that too for the same reason, but they had offered to pray for the emperor once a year instead and that was accepted by the Roman authorities. The Christians could have made a similar arrangement. Instead they preferred “martyrdom”. The persecution they suffered was entirely of their own making. But at least they made themselves useful by providing a tasty meal for the lions of the Colosseum. Poor dears!
    Picture of useful Christians :

  153. @Ann Nonny Mouse

    Don’t trust rabbinic literature.

    Don’t trust Wikipedia either.

    • Agree: Ann Nonny Mouse
    • Replies: @paranoid goy
  154. I’m just going to leave this here …

    “The COVID-19 virus will hit hardest those states in Fragile or Conflict Situations (FCS) – Libya, Syria, Yemen, Iraq, Lebanon, the West Bank and Gaza – which, even prior to the pandemic, faced the risk of becoming chronically failing or even failed states.”

    “A World Bank report released in February noted that people living in proximity to conflict has doubled since 2007, and estimates that by 2030 nearly 2/3s of the world’s extreme poor will be living in fragile and conflict situations (FCS).

    A region facing endemic fragility and conflict
    https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/33324/9781464815409.pdf

    Which ethno-religious group could benefit from this then, I wonder?

  155. @AaronB

    These are parasites, not outsiders or newcomers. CBS does not give you any information BTW

  156. @Franklin Ryckaert

    I am jealous that Europe was able to rid themselves of diaspora group, get them into Poland and eventually the New Jewish run USA and Israel.

    Germany’s National Government Debt reached 2,319.5 USD billion in Sep 2019, compared with 2,325.7 USD billion in the previous quarter.

    Israel’s National Government Debt reached 219.3 USD billion in Dec 2018, compared with 207.5 USD billion in the previous year.

    New Jewish USA debt: equals 23 trillion and quickly rising.

    To think my Grandfather fought for these Sanhedrin freaks to have them come here.

  157. @Grahamsno(G64)

    Its called War. The casualties of Jews in WW2 were much less than that of the Russians and Polish people.
    People fucking Die

  158. Angharad says:
    @Iva

    Jews didn’t suffer in Jew War II. Humans did.

    • Replies: @anarchyst
  159. anarchyst says:
    @Angharad

    According to the jewish Talmud, jews are the only humans.

    The “rest of us” are “livestock, albeit with souls, whose only purpose is to serve the jews”.

  160. samster says:
    @Anonymous

    “Also, the Israelis are mistreated by the Palestinians.”

    The Ashkenazim invaded a land to which they never had any connection or claim.
    When your home is broken into, and your family murdered, would you rise up to fight with your bare hands the well-armed invaders?! Will you “mistreat” them?!

    May you go through that, you asshole kike!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  161. Anonymous[134] • Disclaimer says:

    I don’t think Jews were poisoning wells back in the day, however as an international people whose business and family affairs frequently had them travel between countries and cities, Jews would have been a vector for disease spread.

    You can easily imagine situations were disease would have struck a community after the arrival of Jews in the locality. Paranoid and uneducated people would have jumped to the conclusion that the Jews were deliberately spreading disease.

  162. Chensley says:
    @Igor Svetnick's Confessor

    Sounds like he’s trying to atone for this obvious conflict he’s experiencing.

  163. Anonymous[134] • Disclaimer says:

    Jews were also accused of spreading polio in the early 20th century. This was a disease associated with the urban poor living in unhygienic slums.

  164. Blubb says:
    @AaronB

    Public service announcement:

    DO NOT DARE TO SPEAK ON MEDIEVAL HISTORY IF YOU DON’T EVEN KNOW WHAT THE FUCKING DARK AGES ARE, YOU FUCKING MORON!

    IF YOU DON’T KNOW WHAT YOU’RE TALKING ABOUT, THEN SHUT THE FUCK UP!!!

  165. anarchyst says:
    @meena

    It’s not “smarts” or “IQ” that gives jews an advantage over gentile whites, but is their rabid insistence on cultural and social cohesiveness, insularity and nepotism (but only for themselves) that gives them an “advantage”.
    This same cultural and social cohesiveness that is prized so highly by jewish interests is denied to gentile whites.
    Jews, to a man will fight to deny this same cultural and social cohesiveness to gentile whites that they themselves enjoy as it is a major part of the jewish purpose–the destruction of gentile white culture, which IS superior to any jewish cultural or social society. If jews did not possess this power, they would most likely be rag merchants, liquor merchants, or furniture merchants–nothing more.
    As I have previously stated, jewish success is based on cultural and social cohesiveness and insularity–NOT “smarts” or “IQ”.
    Once enough jews get into a position of power in the work world or education systems, they will hire and promote their own, even bypassing more qualified gentile white candidates.
    Jews have latched on to cultural cohesiveness and nepotism, as it serves their purpose exceedingly well.
    At the same time, jews pushed the concept of racial “equality”, (but only for gentile whites), backing it up with “civil-rights” and “equal accommodation” laws which are enforced by governments–but only against whites. These “civil-rights” laws are used as a “battering ram” against gentile whites to diffuse and fragment any semblance of gentile white solidarity and cohesiveness that may arise.
    Jews are the only group that lacks a moral component. Jews are very amoral, think nothing of screwing a “goy” out of money, possessions, or even reputation or life. You see, the jewish talmud elevates the jew above all others, “goyim” being “livestock with souls, created only to serve the jew”.
    This amorality is a critical component in jewish life and is partially responsible for jewish successes. When one does not possess a moral compass that defines and separates “right from wrong” THAT in itself gives the jew greater latitude to “get what he wants” as there are “no limits” on what a jew may do to gain the advantage in just about any situation. The lack of a moral component within jewish life is a major reason for jewish supremacy in civilized societies.
    A great reckoning dealing with the jews is coming. As gentile whites become more marginalized, the accusation of being tagged as “racist” or a “holocaust denier” is rapidly losing its “sting”.
    Increasingly, jews are more wary of being “called out” and recognized as “jews”. One can call a jew a shyster, shylock, bankster, criminal or ne-er-do-well, and it will roll off his back like water off a duck, BUT call a jew a “jew”, and he will recoil in horror, having been “found out”. This is a major reason why so many jews change their names.
    One last point is the jewish practice of “male genital mutilation” (circumcision) (bris) performed on the eighth day after birth.
    This barbaric practice contributes to mental illness among jews in two ways:
    –one, the practice itself which inflicts unnecessary pain on the infant and is traumatizng to the point of inflicting future mental illness.
    –two, the practice of the “mohel” fellating the infant (metzitzah b’peh) after the “deed is done”. This is a sure way of passing on the STDS that are infecting the “mohel” to the infant. As most STDs do not manifest themselves until later in life, mental illness is the result. Maybe this is a reason why many jews are so “twisted”…

  166. International Jew [AKA "Hebrew National"] says:

    tl;dr. What’s your bottom line? Did the Jews, in your fevered imagination, poison the wells and deliberately spread the Black Plague?

    • Replies: @anarchyst
  167. anarchyst says:
    @International Jew

    Yes, jews have been poisoning wells for centuries. What better way to expropriate (steal) real estate than to get rid of the current inhabitants?
    Jews have been poisoning Palestinian wells in the “occupied territories” to the present day.

  168. obvious says:
    @carsondyal

    You were certainly entitled to specific speech patterns and some extra personal validation by echo chambering, just to show who’s really in charge. “The Whole World” is not wrong right or anything at all, and I would have asked “who’s the whole world? YOU??” Really… the WHOLE WORLD, even Santa Claus??

    I have a malicious female relative who liked to talk about “we this” and “We that” all the time, even though “we” must have been 3 or 4 people if it was somehow “we”, which is it wasn’t. You are the typical baby boomer out of body fantasy projector, so typically self-absorbed, petulant and demanding, armchair-easy “critic”. Full of assumptions and lecturing, nothing to lose or risk taken. A perfect consumer of mass media.

    Amirite?

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Andrew Joyce Comments via RSS
PastClassics
The unspoken statistical reality of urban crime over the last quarter century.
Talk TV sensationalists and axe-grinding ideologues have fallen for a myth of immigrant lawlessness.
Which superpower is more threatened by its “extractive elites”?
How a Young Syndicate Lawyer from Chicago Earned a Fortune Looting the Property of the Japanese-Americans, then Lived...
Becker update V1.3.2