The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewAndrew Anglin Archive
Obituary for Rush Limbaugh
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

Rush Limbaugh has died.

Up until this morning, he was probably the most influential man alive. Despite his direct influence waning, he is a man who shaped an entire generation of conservative thought, for better and worse.

He was an American icon, he was a genius, he was a sellout and a glutton who wasn’t willing to do the right thing when it was hard.

As an adult reflecting on my childhood, I’ve come to believe that much of my brain’s wiring was influenced by Rush Limbaugh. I try to keep personal matters off of this site as much as possible, because it doesn’t matter who we are, what matters is our plan. But I have said before that as a child, I spent a lot of time with my grandmother.

My grandfather died very young, not long after sixty. Grandma had the radio on all the time, in the house and car, and back then, it seemed like Rush Limbaugh was on all day long.

Here’s an archive show from 1990. Just to give you an idea of what was going on in the background when my brain formed.

People aren’t really aware now, but in the Bill Clinton years, Limbaugh was basically a proto Alex Jones. He would talk about the New World Order conspiracy to build a global government, freemasonry, and communism being a Jewish conspiracy. He would mix that with the standard pre-William Buckley type conservative views on race and sex.

In the early 2000s, he was having some personal and professional problems, and he got the opportunity to sell out and promote those wars that George W. Bush did for the Jewish Lobby.

Even when Rush was selling out, the thing that he was preaching would have been good if it wasn’t a big scam. That is to say, it wasn’t like Charlie Kirk promoting gay anal sex with men in Africa and saying that liberals are the real homophobes. He was not polluting values in the way that modern “conservatives” do, he was simply lying. There is a qualitative difference there, and the record should show that. Rush never promoted homosexuality, feminism, or race mixing. He never tried to change traditional American values, he just used traditional American values to push a bizarre Jewish agenda.

The Bush Wars were sold as some sequel to the Crusades, and as a Liam Neeson style revenge fantasy against evil towel-headed beard men. If it was real, it would have been awesome.

But, it was not real. And now that he is dead, he will be forever remembered as someone who told lies to people who trusted him.

Start at 5:25 on this clip from an interview that was recorded in 1988, when I was four years old.

He says: “Jewish Lobby.”

He says: “You can say ‘Jewish Lobby’ anywhere but New York, and nobody will notice.”

That’s the world of American conservatism that he inherited and became the standard bearer of. It was a culture where you could say “Jew.” And at his death, if you say “Jewish Lobby,” people do a lot more than notice.

Rush was always fat. Eventually, that fatness polluted his soul, and he used his genius for evil.

For a while in the early 2000s, he wasn’t doing political talk radio. In 2003, he briefly did sports talk on ESPN, and he was probably the first person to be canceled for racism.

He said:

I don’t think he’s been that good from the get-go. I think what we’ve had here is a little social concern in the NFL. I think the media has been very desirous that a black quarterback do well. They’re interested in black coaches and black quarterbacks doing well. I think there’s a little hope invested in McNabb and he got a lot of credit for the performance of his team that he really didn’t deserve. The defense carried this team.

That was in 2003. He lost a bad job for saying something true.

He would soon get a good job for saying something false.

He went back to political talk, and started shilling these wars.

But this is the headline on HuffPo:

The Jews are not grateful.

It is impossible to imagine what the world would have been like without him. It’s almost certain that naturally conservative people would not have been so gung-ho about the wars. What he did was work a kind of voodoo on people, and transfer the fear of communism and the trauma of the 911 attacks into a paranoid fantasy that enveloped the minds of the average white working and middle class American.

He bought the ticket and took the ride. Or rather the reverse. He took the ticket money and got ridden around like a donkey by a bunch of Jews. These Jews were doing massive wars, and he sold them. This man convinced people that Iraq – a third world country where people were riding camels through the streets of the downtown of the capital city – was going to invade America.

Imagine selling that idea. You have to be a genius to be able to get people to believe something so moronic. There was a Philip K. Dick style surrealism to this man’s voice being in everyone’s head through the Bush years, preaching a paranoid delusion that served the interests of an alien ruling class.

The human brain does not have a defense mechanism against radio. If a man is good enough at it, he can make people’s subconscious minds believe that his words are their own thoughts. Rush Limbaugh was the best there ever was.

He was a genius, turned evil by the sin of gluttony. He is survived by four wives. He was humiliated for illegal Viagra while on a sex tourist vacation in the Caribbean. He was addicted to pills. He was a typical loud, messy fat person, who happened to be a genius capable of hypnotizing tens of millions of Americans into thinking Arabs were going to ride camels across the Atlantic Ocean and force us all to live under Sharia Law, which by his telling, was basically the exact same thing as communism – somehow.

For me personally, he was something different, of course. Every cultural figure has an effect on both the culture and on every individual in the culture, and these are going to be different things. When you’re a child, a droning background noise of someone ranting is going to do even more extreme things to your brain. I cannot even imagine the number of hours I must have absorbed of Rush Limbaugh when my brain was forming. I like the way my brain has formed.

Go read the Wikipedia list of his “views.” He was saying “sexual consent” is a fantasy hoax up until this morning. He was correct on all of the core issues. He puts Breitbart to shame. There was no apology for racism or sexism or “homophobia.” There was a lot of good in Rush Limbaugh, and that is why he is such a truly tragic figure.

What we must learn is that the wages of sin is death. Everyone dies, but I can’t stress the importance of this enough: what you do changes the world. Everyone changes the world, by doing whatever they do, and whatever they don’t do.

Rush is dead now, and it’s up to God to judge his soul. But it’s my job to judge his life. I should be able to write a glowing review of the life of a man who was a right-wing icon of my country. I can’t write a glowing review of this man’s life because he let his sin swallow him up. He was a glutton who wanted comfortable rides and big buffets and buckets of pills and big fake titty hookers jiggling around. He was basically a Nero type figure, fiddling around while the country burned.

When I was four years old, you could say “Jewish lobby” everywhere in America, except New York, and no one would think anything of it. Rush Limbaugh said AIDS was a hoax and that black people were stupid, but if he would have kept saying the one thing that needed to be said – “Jewish lobby” – his life would have become a lot less comfortable. It no longer would have been a life for a fat man bobbing around on pills. He’d have had to have lost that weight for all the ducking and dodging he’d have to be doing, and dumped the pills for fear they’d dull his reflexes. He wouldn’t be able to roll up to the buffet in a limousine.

Let’s learn a lesson:

You should live your life as if everything you do is going to be written in your obituary.

You’re going to die some day, but the choices you make will shape eternal reality. Some day, that sky is going to open up, the light is going to shine on all of us, and the dust will settle. Everyone will be forced to see things as they are. History will not be kind to Rush Limbaugh.

We all sin. But we must recognize it as sin, and not let the sin become who we are. When you sin, you must recognize it as sin, internalize the recognition of it as sin, and don’t ever let the sin overtake you. Don’t ever be defined by the sin. Don’t ever get fat and don’t ever shill for the Jews and their lies for the sake of comfort.

God will forgive a lot. God will forgive anything, in fact, save for one thing: He will not forgive a failure to ask to be forgiven. We are all sinners, but we must define our sin and not let our sin define us.

Today America mourns the death of Rush Limbaugh. And today Rush Limbaugh mourns the discovery that in Hell, the pills make the pain worse, the hookers are all trannies, and the buffets are riddled with maggots.

(Republished from The Daily Stormer by permission of author or representative)
 
Hide 431 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. Anonymous[237] • Disclaimer says:

    It was an okay obit up until the last two paragraphs where you imply Rush is in hell.

  2. This is a nasty, despicable obituary. Anglin is demonic.

  3. Biff says:

    In 1993 Rush came to my part of the world for an event called ‘Dan’s Bake Sale’.

    https://archive.seattletimes.com/archive/?date=19930523&slug=1702778

    His motorcade and the event itself had government protection including SWAT teams and snipers on roofs of surrounding buildings. It was then I considered him just another propagandist state asset, and still do today.

    • Thanks: Truth
  4. Bolteric says:

    I thought it was interesting, and I’ve only read the DS a handful of times. I wanted to read something interesting on his passing today, and I knew CNN, Fox, NYT and WaPo weren’t going to fit the bill. They are too busy writing their own obits.

    • Replies: @James Forrestal
  5. He was an obedient Shabbos Goy. He paid the sodomite Elton John to perform at one of his four weddings. He was a drug addict while attacking working class people for using drugs—the same working class people who are in a slave state of existence because of the wealthy “conservatives” (Shabbos Goys) Limbaugh played golf with and associated with off-hours. He did say many things I agree with, such as calling that slut a slut, and similar statements about pop culture issues, but that does not negate his being a piece of sh*t Self-hating Gentile. Anyone that supports Israel and the Zionist occupation of America cannot be tolerated. Anyone that supports the financial elite (the ones who are actively suffocating all of us) cannot be tolerated.

    I hope he rots in hell or suffers the hell of a painful and vicious reincarnation.

  6. Rush was a flawed man as we are all flawed. He brought joy to millions of people and for whatever mistakes he made, I hope he will be remembered fondly by the people that enjoyed his content. I could care less what shitlibs and anti-racists think about him or his place in society. I would like to think he asked forgiveness for his sins and is resting in peace. God bless Rush.

    • Agree: TTSSYF
    • Replies: @Jim Christian
    , @Anonymice
  7. Rurik says:
    @Anonymous

    Rush is in hell.

    like Buckley, he was a whore of zion

  8. @Anonymous

    He is in some sort of hell. You can’t be an errand boy for the Rabbinate and not be in hell once you leave this existence.

    • Agree: HeebHunter, Carlo
  9. It is true that everyone makes mistakes, but promoting outright evil like the (((American))) wars of aggression across the middle east (and the world) really stains your character and influence. I remember hearing Rush on the radio during the early 2000s as an adolescent. Granted, he was not as blind as the libtards about many things, but that isn’t saying much. He shamelessly shilled for wars which have killed probably millions of civilians, and promoted the absurd 911 official account that was used to push through the patriot act and all kinds of wickedness at home. I don’t know about his personal life, but publicly I think Rush was a real sell out and basically a deceiver.

  10. Franz says:

    To risk repetition —

    NAFTA

    The working class took to Rush first, and he fucked them first. That’s all y’all.

    Rest in peace in the bowels of hell, Rush. And good riddance.

  11. Rush put more testosterone into the conservative movement and that is worth something. Yes, I wish he’d been more of a hawk in immigration and other issues, but it’s not like any of the other conservatives were doing a good job.

    When I was four years old, you could say “Jewish lobby” everywhere in America, except New York, and no one would think anything of it.

    I don’t think that’s quite true. But to be blunt, those who associated a discussion of the issue with swastikas and scary rhetoric played right into the hands of those who wanted the issue silenced.

    Almost as if they were being paid to do so.

  12. bayviking says:

    Trump and Limbaugh, birds of a feather. Both are incapable of understanding the root cause of anything. Yet, expert at gaining publicity by blaming innocent bystanders for your troubles. As long as that means our politicians, police and military industrial are not to blame the bullshit lives on with plenty of Corporate media support.

    • Replies: @Wally
    , @reminder
    , @AKINDLE
  13. Rahan says:
    @Anonymous

    It was an okay obit up until the last two paragraphs where you imply Rush is in hell.

    I too believe that tranny hookers, eating maggots, and pain amplification games is in fact heaven. A heaven that is fast approaching. Hail utopia, hail hail!

    The words that listeners start to believe are their own thoughts really help the process along.
    https://hypnodb.com/BDSM-Femdom-Hypnosis

    http://bambisleep.com/home/

    Destroying Middle Eastern countries is also heaven.

  14. Not Raul says:
    @Anonymous

    It was an okay obit up until the last two paragraphs where you imply Rush is in hell.

    I’m sorry you got triggered.

    Do you need a hankie, or a fidget spinner, or some Xanax, or something?

    • Replies: @TKK
    , @redflame
  15. Not Raul says:

    Today America mourns the death of Rush Limbaugh. And today Rush Limbaugh mourns the discovery that in Hell, the pills make the pain worse, the hookers are all trannies, and the buffets are riddled with maggots.

    Are you sure that the “woman” in the picture with him isn’t a tranny?

    Rush might not mind Hell as much as you think.

    Think of all the compromat the CIA, Mossad, FBI, etc. had on Rush from all of his sex trips.

    • Replies: @Truth
  16. I don’t know about this one. Bashing boomer-cons is like shooting fish in a barrel and if pushing the Iraqi debacle or Reaganomics is disqualifying we would have to include Tucker, Ann Coulter and basically the entire American right pre-2015.

    Unlike most Conservatives he never really cucked on core issues like crime, immigration or social liberalism. That said expecting someone like him to go full 1488 is ridiculous regardless of some quotes from his early career.

    His flaws (And there were many) stemmed from a naive idealism characteristic of his generation. And for better or worse anything left of the old America will be dead forever once they’re gone.

    So I choose to remember the good things.

    He was funny, he gave a lot to charity, he helped get Trump elected and the America he believed in and still existed in the 90’s was a pretty nice country.

    I’m going to miss it. RIP Rush and America.

  17. Today America mourns the death of Rush Limbaugh. And today Rush Limbaugh mourns the discovery that in Hell, the pills make the pain worse, the hookers are all trannies, and the buffets are riddled with maggots.

    God, I do so love Andrew Anglin! I laughed until my sides hurt. He’s a real piece of work that Anglin.

    • Agree: Haxo Angmark
  18. Andrew Anglin is the man who, if God’s desires greatness of him, will be caused to humble himself to God rather that humbling himself to the ‘truth’ as Andrew sees it.

    Andrew, have you any idea of the temptation Mr. Limbaugh may have resisted in order to have achieved whatever good (if any) he contributed to this world? For every ‘truth’ that Tucker Carlson these days is allowed to utter, there are another ten truths he is told to swallow. That is, if Tucker chooses to please man, rather than please God. Whether we should obey men rather than God, you decide Acts 5:29

    Presently on one hand you witness to your own truth, yet on the other, you cannot witness to God’s plan for Mr. Limbaugh in the big picture. You say Mr. Limbaugh did a second-rate imitation of himself. Maybe so. You swear that God lives, yet somehow disagree that God does not “Declare the end from the beginning, and from ancient times the things that are not yet done, saying, My counsel shall stand, and I will do all my pleasure” Isaiah 46:10. That means Rush Limbaugh became whatever God commanded him to be. Simple, yet confusing to a truthist such as yourself, what with all your emergency virtue signal flashers going full tilt.

    By witnessing to your own truths, you become a third-rate imitation of your own conceptions. Indeed, or it would not be deception. “If you were blind, you wouldn’t be guilty. But you remain guilty because you claim you can see.” John 9:41
    Draw near to God and He will draw near to you James 4:8
    “Seek God’s knowledge first. . . sufficient unto the day, is the evil in yourself.” Matthew 6:33-34

    • Replies: @stevennonemaker88
  19. I do think the worse thing Rush did was shill for the wars. Amazingly, during Trump years he seems to have advocated against warring. So, he really was being dishonest about wars, as we saw in his flip-flopping on support for them. And anyone who knows anything about the last 30 years, which is everyone that was an adult through these years, knows that the Neo-Cons who took the reigns of power were very saturated with Zionist Jews, who were basically working for Israeli/Zionist interests. Of course, the other element was fat-cat MIC capitalists & rising Deep state technocrats, most who were Not Jewish. Rush supported those Neo-Cons during the 2000’s but seems to have moved away from them when his friend Trump became President.

    I’m a Recovering Democrat. I look at Rush as someone who helped me to decompress from early Democratic/liberal indoctrination from my up-bringing. I started listening to Rush in 1990 and he really opened my eyes to “the other side”, which I found not to be quite as evil as I was trained to believe.

    Like most Men (and women) who start to taste power, he definitely got carried away and he is far from perfect. But he still did a great job in exposing the Democrat/Liberal agenda and that is what we can be thankful for from him the most.

  20. Dumbo says:
    @Anonymous

    I agree. We have no way of knowing where Rush is, or if he repented or not; I like to think that he did.

    For me the problem is that he wasn’t, like many others, simply deluded about 9/11 and the Iraq war (I know I was, for a while – those two towers burning “because of 19 Arabs with boxcutters” were probably the most impressive act of hypnosis ever created by mankind). But he had to know that none of that was true. It’s easier to forgive ignorance than a willing sell-out.

    But then again, he wasn’t a complete sell-out like so many others, and in other aspects of the culture wars he still fought the good fight. RIP.

    • Replies: @SMK
    , @The Soft Parade
  21. He would talk about the New World Order conspiracy to build a global government, freemasonry, and communism being a Jewish conspiracy.

    I’m not sure if I’m reading this right. In his early years, did Rush Limbaugh openly say communism was a Jewish conspiracy? The reason I doubt it is that if he had said it publicly even once he would forever have been labeled an “antisemite” and “Holocaust denier”.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  22. Schuetze says:

    Anglin hits another line drive. It takes someone willing to name the jew to be able to write an obituary about someone who spent his entire life refusing to name the jew.

    Rush Limbaugh was the personification of Boobus Americanus and he played a very significant role in the final destruction of what remained of the country when he took to the airwaves. Limbaugh was always a big supporter of the MIC and the Bush clan. He was a cheerleader for both Iraq invasions. He was a big proponent for professional sports mind control.

    In the late ’80’s and early ’90’s when I was living in Germany, I would listen to Limbaugh on AFN (American Forces News) which was broadcast all across Germany and Italy while commuting to work. The American Military was bombarded by his war mongering for decades, as were English speaking Germans and Italians. He pushed Reagan’s America as a shining city on the hill to the entire planet.

    Just like Trump, his religiosity was always fake, but his narcissism wasn’t. The only thing Rush Limbaugh really cared about was Rush Limbaugh.

  23. Bigots vs Progots.

    • Replies: @Curmudgeon
  24. meamjojo says:

    Buh-bye. Hope it was a painful ending.

  25. Thanks Jews

    • LOL: Biff
    • Replies: @InnerCynic
  26. Stern’s career ran, time frame-wise, in lockstep with Rush. Stern did nothing but shit on Rush, of course, Stern being Jewish liberal Democrat. Stern used to shit on Blacks though, there are lots of Stern’s anti-Black rants on Youtube, haranguing Blacks for their criminality in NYC and Philly and DC. Blacks screaming there are too many police in their community? Stern’s answer: “Stop doing things that bring in the police”. That was the nineties, in the same frame Rush was talking about the same things. Stern was big friends with Senator Al DiMato, with Rudy, for cleaning up NYC, and why not? Stern worked and later lived in NYC, once there, who needs crime? And fuck the Blacks, that position was consistent throughout the 90s at CBS Radio. For all Stern’s liberal horseshit and HIS depravities, for all his hating Rush Limbaugh, he held the same positions, except Stern would never advertise Jewish privilege, and he only would admit to being half Jewish until five or six years back and now he’s nearly and proudly, Hassid, you go where the privilege is. See? Sell-out. Now, to Stern, out in the Hamptons, black criminality is mostly peacefull. But in the late 80s-the mid 2000s, Stern and Rush were at the same positions on all sorts of issues including Saddam and WMD, blacks and 9/11. Stern and Rush were bros, except something kept Stern nipping at Rush’s heels. Wonder what that was.

    The rest? Rush’s depravities? Well, women being women, even Rush could get a million women if he has a million bucks. That’s what women are, only thing to discuss is price. Women follow money, that’s what they do. There’s a price on that pussy and Rush was willing to pay it. Tiger, the Kennedys, there’s so much pussy coming at money, the fellas can’t resist. And they pay the price, they sell their souls. And who with a dick could say they’d do any different? Like Chris Rock says, it’s easy to be pious about women if no woman wants to fuck you. When they do, because of your money, you can’t resist. It’s a transaction, maybe that’s why it’s so easy.

    • Replies: @Johnny Rico
  27. “Feminism was established so as to allow unattractive women easier access to the mainstream society.” – Rush Limbaugh

    By the looks of Limbaugh, “Conservatism was established so as to allow fatso men easier access to the fame and fortune.”

    • Replies: @obvious
  28. Enjoyed your article. I am somewhat older than you so he didn’t influence me as much as he did you. I found him entertaining and agreed with most of what he said. I know he was extremely wealthy but I wonder if he ever donated to Amren, Vdare, Counter Currents or other WN websites? 4 wives is a bit much. Although he knew current events very well, I don’t think he was very well educated or well read in History, Philosophy, Economics, Literature, etc. I stopped listening to him about the same time I stopped subscribing to National Review which was after the atrocious cover story article by David Frum criticizing all those who opposed the Bush II Iraq War. I like Tucker but I was disappointed to see Tucker and Mark Steyn gushing over Rush last night.

    • Agree: europeasant
    • Replies: @Carroll Price
  29. Darkwing says:

    Limp balls was nothing more that a blow hard. What happened to him he brought on himself. I use to listen until he said: “It is tough being right all the time”. Total ego, just like Trump

  30. Lee says:

    Mr. Anglin should consider how his relations might feel if at his passing someone penned his

    obit that needlessly snarked about his human shortcomings and downplayed/disrespected

    whatever meager accomplishments he might have made in his life.

    Get back to us when you have 27 million followers and have revolutionized an industry.

    • Replies: @Schuetze
  31. Pratts says:

    I was in Baghdad in the late 80s, and nobody was riding camels in town there. Rather, newspapers were boasting about succesful trials of mid-range rockets, which do not make sense to have for conventional warheads. Also, remember that the French under Chirac had sold Iraq a nuclear reactor and a lot of nuclear know how.

    Definitely Saddam was trying to acquire nuclear weapons. Whether he ever had them is doubtful, whether he would ever have gotten them if left alone isn’t sure either, but considerably less doubtful.

    Does that make the second Iraq war a good idea? Can still be debated. But disappointment with the Bush II years should not induce a knee-jerk rejection of everything from that era. Conventional wisdom reflexively turned on its head is a facile mirror image only, and not mature, informed, and reality-oriented reasoning either.

    • Agree: 36 ulster
    • Disagree: Niebelheim
  32. Never a fan of Rush, I was only mildly happy to see that he had passed.

    I will be ecstatic when I read that Dick “Head” Cheney is no longer with us.

    Same for Tony Bliar.

    And Bill “Psycho” Gates.

    And Klaus “Anal” Schwab.

    And Bill “Slick Willy” Clinton.

    And Hitlery Clinton.

    And Benjamin Nuttyahoo.

    And George Soros……. etc., etc.

    The list is seemingly endless.

    Unfortunately, many of these war criminals and world destroyers will likely outlive me, as I am getting old and not in the best of health.

    Regardless, this was another fine offering here on Unz that reflects a view of Rush that I suspect many of his fans and followers might not have fully appreciated…..

    • Thanks: Rurik, Irish Savant
  33. “You have to be a genius to be able to get people to believe something so moronic.”

    Conversely, people have to be so moronic that it would make any idiot so credulous.

    • Agree: Sollipsist, InnerCynic
  34. xyzxy says:

    The old man used to listen to Rush, and when home I’d catch his shtick. Toward the end of Bill Buckley’s life Rush had him on the show. I guess in order to pay homage to a dying man.

    The obsequious smarm Limbaugh showed the almost dead ‘conservative’ commentator would have embarrassed any self-respecting man possessing insight. Rush was ‘honored’ to speak to the ‘great man’, and Buckley, for his part, ate it up. It was, after all, his due, and what was expected.

    After that performance I couldn’t stomach Limbaugh anymore.

  35. onebornfree says: • Website

    Ryan McMaken of the Mises Institute gives a far better and far more succinct and balanced summary of Limbaughs career than what is written by this Anglin, “itz da jooz dunnit”, collectivist halfwit:

    Excerpt: “But for the most part, his legacy was one of being pro-regime when the GOP is in, and being anti-regime when the GOP is out. Given that he was an entertainer, of course, it’s hard to fault Limbaugh too much for this. He was just giving his audience what it wanted. And what his audience wanted was a simplistic yet incoherent idea which maintained that things are mostly fine when Republicans are in office, but that the world is mess when Democrats win the White House. He was clearly very successful at delivering the message. ”

    “Rush Limbaugh Was Great When Democrats Were in the White House”
    https://mises.org/power-market/rush-limbaugh-was-great-when-democrats-were-white-house

    Regards, onebornfree

    • LOL: HeebHunter
  36. Andrew,

    I appreciate your insight into this greedy pompous example of (((controlled opposition))). His neo-con bloviating quickly turned me off, so I’m surprised to learn he once upon a time raised the JQ.

    When I abandoned the Christianity I was raised with I went through my smug-preachy-atheist phase before I had to admit the data points on the Decent-Scumbag Spectrum seem similar for believers & non-believers.

    And religious tunes like these still stir my soul:

    “Tall Oak Tree” (Dorsey Burnett):
    — (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4d2cWYWbO4s ]

    “Amazing Grace” (Judy Collins):
    — (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_QJic_lAe5M ]

    So I’m content to leave religious people be — unless they proselytize (& think I deserve to be tortured for eternity). Then I am reminded of this definition of Christianity:

    “The belief that a cosmic Jewish zombie who was his own father can make you live forever if you symbolically eat his flesh and telepathically tell him you accept him as your lord and master, so he can remove an evil force from your soul that is present in humanity because a rib-woman was convinced by a talking snake to eat from a magical tree.”

    • Thanks: TKK
    • LOL: InnerCynic
    • Replies: @europeasant
    , @Mike321
    , @Dumbo
  37. Rahan says:
    @Pratts

    Does that make the second Iraq war a good idea? Can still be debated. But disappointment with the Bush II years should not induce a knee-jerk rejection of everything from that era.

    Back then I too was a crypto-neocon, cheerleading for this crap. I now admit I was wrong, and just because back then the people who held the other position were super annoying histrionic whores, does not mean that they were wrong. In this they were right.

    Indeed, one of the lessons I learned lately is that separating an idea from the person uttering it is a must. Sometimes a paranoid peasant mumbles some crazy shit, and then later it turns out he was right. Or some feminist commie shrieks something, and later it also turns out she was right. Life can be complex like that.

    Anyway, today I can definitely say that there is nothing to be debated about the second Iraq war.
    a) You cannot just invade random countries because “they have the wrong system” or “are making nukes” or “are oppressing their transvestites”. That’s not OK. Especially if millions die because of this, tens of millions are displaced, the infrastructure is in ruins, maybe even civil war erupts. That’s bullshit. That’s evil stuff.
    b) Specifically about Iraq, this retarded idea that “Saddam did 9/11” combined with dark hints “Saddam tried to kill Bush” and others like that, that’s triple bullshit.

    Another thing clear in hindsight is that at that point the USA was already taken over by various “industrial complexes” and the public excuse for the invasions and interventions were retarded yes, but the actual reasons were simply the organization of as many “forever wars” as possible, that will feed those industrial complexes. Like they tried with Vietnam, and this time really did pull off, due to a lack of draft, and the gradual substitution of “official army troops” with “private company troops”.

    We have branches of the Deep State waging forever wars by using private armies combined with state resources in order to steal trillions. That millions of innocent people suffer they don’t care, they are psychopaths.

    This strengthened them and emboldened them and now they are applying the same to the US of A too.

    9/11 was a coup, like Watergate was a coup, and Russiagate was a coup, but Watergate and Russiagate were “revenge coups” against populists, while 9/11 was a pre-emptive coup that ushered in new rules, and new ways of running the country and the world.

    There is nothing to be debated about the second Iraq war. How people live in their country, and how they use their tech abilities is their own business. If you’re unhappy about what they do–use economic sanctions. If shit goes into actual REAL genocidal massacre mode like in Cambodia, or Rwanda–sure, invade and fix shit and leave.

    But using lame made up excuses to start forever wars that not only destroy countless lives that you were supposedly “saving”, but also create the institutional weapons and dark budgets that you then use to take over the “Free World”–that’s… that’s why we are all here.

    GloboHomo has a left wing, a center, and a right wing. The left wing is self-evident, the center is the bureaucratic deep state that just wants to endlessly expand and self-perpetuate, and the right wing is the neocon-corporate alliance.

    The 9/11 coup and the patriot act and the forever wars–that was a triumph for the right wing of GloboHomo, a triumph for which many brainwashed conservatives cheered at the time, me included.

    But to still believe that all of that was OK now in 2021, that’s… that’s kinda…

    • Replies: @HeebHunter
  38. BuelahMan says:

    Anglin’s personal life includes his hypocritical (some call it “lying”) stance on screwing little colored asian girls while pretending he and his ilk are white nationalists.

    Anglin is almost as bug a hypocrite as Rush was. Yet we still have to see Anglin’s shit on Unz when I don’t remember a single thing Rush did being offered here.

    • Troll: Pop Warner
    • Replies: @HeebHunter
    , @Truth
    , @Rahan
    , @JxyBoi
  39. SMK says: • Website
    @Dumbo

    I not sure what you’re saying, exactly, or what you believe: Are you claiming that the 9-11 terrorist attacks didn’t occur -that nobody was murdered and that the Twin Towers are still standing?- or that people other than 19 Arabs and Muslims with box-cutters hijacked 4 planes and flew two of them into the Twin Tower, murdering over 3,ooo people, but failed in their efforts to attack the Pentagon and White House? Either way, your psychosis is mind-boggling.

    • Replies: @Johnny Walker Read
    , @Dumbo
  40. Anonymous[354] • Disclaimer says:
    @Ray Caruso

    He would talk about the New World Order conspiracy to build a global government, freemasonry, and communism being a Jewish conspiracy.

    Yeah, I was an adult listener then and that just didn’t happen. The author is an idiot (on a good day).

  41. Sick Creep Joe Biden Praises Kids for Having Interracial Sex: “This New Generation is Not Like Us! WE HAVE TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THEM!!!” (Shocking Video)

    • Replies: @saggy
  42. fnn says:

    …communism being a Jewish conspiracy.

    I think you’re putting us on in claiming that Limbaugh said that on the radio. The ADL was closely monitoring the airwaves even then.

  43. Schuetze says:
    @Lee

    “Mr. Anglin” has never deviated from telling the cold hard truth, albeit wrapped in dripping sarcasm. Rush Limbaugh was a very talented liar who could read his ignorant audience like a book and play them like a fiddle. Rush Limbaugh is as responsible as anyone else for the mess that the US and the entire planet finds itself in today. Rush Limbaugh with his endless war mongering contributed more than almost any other single american to the decades of never ending war. I sincerely doubt either Bush could have pulled off their Iraq invasions and war crimes without Limbaugh’s never ending stream of “patriotic” lies. Just in terms of the millions of ruined american lives he deserves to rot in hell, but that ignores the many more millions of non american lives that he helped destroy.

    As far as “not speaking ill of the dead” goes, the truth needs to be told especially when it can only come out after the liars have died.

    “A lie can run round the world before the truth has got its boots on.”

    • Agree: Rurik, Carroll Price
    • Replies: @George F. Held
  44. Anglin drops the truth, again. Only hell awaits kikes and their wilful servants. Being unrepentant is the worst sin, as it should be. Just by being repentant you can change the world and kick satan and the kikes in the balls.

    And it really is the easiest thing to do cold turkey. I find it easier than fasting through morning tbh. If you know what you did wrong but cant do that you really need to go to hell.

  45. SMK says: • Website
    @Anonymous

    In respect to the last paragraph; Does the author actually believe such nonsense or is he fantasizing and engaging in wishful thinking and speaking metaphorically. Virtually everyone who believes in God and the afterlife, whether in Heaven or Hell, envisions the “soul” are an invisible spirit, immaterial person, a disembodied mind. Assuming, purely for the sake of argument, that an afterlife, whether in Hell or Heaven, exists and that the “soul” is a mind with no body who lives for eternity, there can be no bodily sensations, sexual or non-sexual, heavenly or hellish, no pills, drugs, sex with women or men as “trannies” and homosexuals, buffets or prison food, maggots, etc.

    For people other than oneself, belief in the fantasy of Heaven or Hell is explained by love and hate, Heaven for those one loves and Hell for those one hates, as with the author and Limbaugh. In contrast, according to Jesus and Christian doctrine, those who believe that Jesus was and is the “son of God” who was born of a virgin and was resurrected after he died of crucifixion will go to Heaven after they die despite their earthly “sins” while all those who don’t believe such fantasies -whether Jews, Hindus, Muslims, Buddhists, atheists, Deists, etc.- will “burn in Hell for eternity.” So Rush is in Heaven if he espouses the myth of Jesus and in Hell if he doesn’t believe such fantasies.

    • Agree: Johnny Walker Read
  46. @BuelahMan

    Mr Unz has articles written by actual neocons and other literal, no joke kike communists. You always have to read everything. It is like saying NS Germand was communist because they read (((Marx))) too. Ridiculous.

    Am I an amerimutt shill for having read the PNAC documentd?

  47. @Pratts

    “But disappointment with the Bush II years should not induce a knee-jerk rejection of everything from that era”

    Don’t forget the Bush 2 era where pushed two very stupid ideas; The Housing Gap and No Child Left behind.

    I can’t understand if Bush the Younger actually believed in the BS or if he was laughing at American gullibility.

  48. Poor effort. Just saying the Jews a lot and calling Limbaugh fat is pretty stupid. The advice to live your life like everything will be in your obituary is even worse. What happened to the jokes? They would have ironed out the constant self-contradiction and repetition. The article reads like it was written by someone on the edge of a very major crisis. Do you need a friend?

    • Replies: @Thim
  49. @Rahan

    Yup, muttmerica has always been a satanic, kosher land of the worst kind of demons mankind’s darkside has to offer.

    (((Trump))) was right, nobody is sending their best when it comes to emigration. Which is why everything is the way it is now.

    • LOL: 36 ulster
  50. This was terribly written and terribly meant. The more of Anglin’s dreck appears here, the more TUR will spiral down the drain of fringe websites full of clowns, unicorns, spambots, sock-puppets, and spooks just like the DS did. That’s Andrew’s game.

    I will pray for Rush Limbaugh in death and I appreciated his life. I’m sorry to see his passing besmirched in this manner.

    • Replies: @BiggDee55
  51. @Pat Kittle

    “The belief that a cosmic Jewish zombie who was his own father can make you live forever if you symbolically eat his flesh and telepathically tell him you accept him as your lord and master, so he can remove an evil force from your soul that is present in humanity because a rib-woman was convinced by a talking snake to eat from a magical tree.”

    I never heard of that definition. Man/Woman does need a religion or so it seems. I was raised in the Catholic religion but I prefer the Greek/Roman system. Too bad we could not keep it but instead replaced those religions with the at first the Jewish tribal God and followed by the Son God and his version of internationalism.

  52. Rush was not the first to succumb to the Jewish elites who have ruled the world for a millennia or more, he was just one of the latest. Personally I hit the off button on Rush shortly after 9/11 when I figured out it was all a set up to launch the Greater Israel project in earnest. Perhaps Rush and Churchill(a man he greatly admired)can smoke cigars and swap “war stories” in whatever special space they now occupy.

    “Until recently, my familiarity with Churchill had been rather cursory, and Irving’s revelations were absolutely eye-opening. Perhaps the most striking single discovery was the remarkable venality and corruption of the man, with Churchill being a huge spendthrift who lived lavishly and often far beyond his financial means, employing an army of dozens of personal servants at his large country estate despite frequently lacking any regular and assured sources of income to maintain them. This predicament naturally put him at the mercy of those individuals willing to support his sumptuous lifestyle in exchange for determining his political activities. And somewhat similar pecuniary means were used to secure the backing of a network of other political figures from across all the British parties, who became Churchill’s close political allies.

    “To put things in plain language, during the years leading up to the Second World War, both Churchill and numerous other fellow British MPs were regularly receiving sizable financial stipends—cash bribes—from Jewish and Czech sources in exchange for promoting a policy of extreme hostility toward the German government and actually advocating war. The sums involved were quite considerable, with the Czech government alone probably making payments that amounted to tens of millions of dollars in present-day money to British elected officials, publishers, and journalists working to overturn the official peace policy of their existing government. A particularly notable instance occurred in early 1938 when Churchill suddenly lost all his accumulated wealth in a foolish gamble on the American stock-market, and was soon forced to put his beloved country estate up for sale to avoid personal bankruptcy, only to quickly be bailed out by a foreign Jewish millionaire intent upon promoting a war against Germany. Indeed, the early stages of Churchill’s involvement in this sordid behavior are recounted in an Irving chapter aptly entitled ‘The Hired Help.’

    https://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2019/11/19/the-truth-about-world-war-ii-is-beginning-to-emerge-74-years-later/

    • Thanks: Carroll Price
  53. Z-man says:

    Bob Grant, king of NY Talk Radio for 30 years, a conservative.

    • Replies: @Bronxite
  54. @SMK

    James Corbett will “splain” it to you in under 5 minutes.
    Cheers


    • Thanks: Jus' Sayin'...
    • Replies: @Rufus Clyde
  55. gnbRC says:

    Tsk, tsk, tsk …

    Rush was the king of tongue-in-cheek outlandish hyperbole … it was entertainment. (Personally, I smile at his phrases like “feminazi tree huggers”, without buying into it mind you. I don’t think he was serious.

    A lot of the comments given are ‘judging’ him on the content – which says a lot about religious upbringing. Being raised a Christian (but now pretty much agnostic) I hadn’t really noticed how much Westerners (including myself) ‘judge’ everything and everyone until I took a job in Asia, where when this aspect surfaced my colleagues would plainly just ask ‘So, you don’t approve?’ Thinking about this over time I came to the conclusion, “Who am I to judge?” (Ans. Just a nobody.)

    One subtle thing that seems to escape most listeners about Rush is that (even if unintended) he was pointing directly at Western society’s lack of self-awareness and dearth of skill in handling the rise of emotions.

    Taking this into account, I think my life would have something less to smile gently about if he were not to have existed.

    • Agree: Sollipsist
    • Replies: @Sollipsist
  56. Mike321 says:
    @Pat Kittle

    Pat Kittle,
    Here’s another one: Mahler’s Symphony #2, “The Resurrection”. I find it impossible to be religious, but this is one of the most beautiful and spiritually moving pieces of music I have ever heard. It’s rather long, but be patient. It’s powerful. Even for an atheist.
    Regards,
    Mike R.

  57. If you google “Rush Limbaugh net worth” you learn that he owned $600,000,000 and earned per year $85,000,000. That is a lot more than Judas’ 30 silver coins, but perhaps that is due to inflation?

    • Replies: @republic
    , @europeasant
  58. @Casey Jones

    This is a nasty, despicable obituary. Anglin is demonic.

    I hear that, but I don’t hear counterpoints. Anglin may very well be demonic. Horns, pitchfork, the works. Now where is he wrong about Limbaugh? Thinking at it for a second, if Anglin is demonic, he may be particularly well suited to comment on Limbaugh.

  59. @George Rockwell

    No shit-lib here, but if Rush Limbaugh brought you joy, you’re so diminished and flawed as not to even have perspective. That’s as lame as CNN and MSNBC-watchers. You are incapable of challenging, as long as you feel “Rush-Joy”? Really! Yer better than that. Care to re-phrase that, Counselor?.

    • Agree: Not Raul
    • Replies: @Ugetit
    , @Dr. Krieger
  60. He should have died in the crib, he was born evil.

  61. saggy says:
    @REDPILLED Media

    Incredible vid … direct link ….




    • Replies: @FoSquare
  62. TKK says:

    Rush is dead now, and it’s up to God to judge his soul

    Wow. So all this misery, tedium, teeth rattling unfairness and toil is just a warm up to a Big Scary Sky Monster really showing me whos’s the Boss?

    Pass the oxycodone and the hookers. I am in.

  63. I started listening to Rush when Bill Clinton won the presidency, and gave up little after Newt Gingrich became speaker. Rush was a good Republican, while I was not. Still this man stopped the Clinton train in its tracks. Due to Rush, Bob Dole became the best oppositional minority leader ever.
    Rush also gave the GOP the house, something no one back then would ever imagined possible. But yeah focus on his weight and wives. Its a boomer thing to think you need to be married, when clearly you’re not cut out for it. Some just aren’t. Also focus on his love for the GOP. For the record it took me a long time to figure out we morphed into just one party.

    Finally if Rush became Jewish controlled opposition, what exactly is Daily Stormer? Here’s a hint, rabbis love Nazis. Heck they made up the phase just for the National Socialists. There’s power in victimhood. By the way Rush Limbaugh never subscribe to the sniveling cult. RIP Rush.

    • Replies: @neutral
  64. gotmituns says:

    I used to listen to Limbaugh but stopped years ago because I noticed his limitations, no criticism of Israel or Jewish anything or talk of 9-11 being an inside job. So I stopped listening and just kept quiet when people talked about his “conservatism.” What’s the use of engaging someone who believes he was a conservative? Their mind is already made up – actually, just like my mind is already made up, but from a completely different angle.

    • Agree: Ugetit
  65. Walter says:

    Long time ago when Rushman was on local AM I heard him splutter on about how cops should be free to search cars and use what “evidence” they said they found…so I called and asked him, what about if the cops are searching a lawyer’s car and take his briefcase filled with confidential and protected client papers?

    Rushman spluttered off into another subject… Later he got in trouble over a “chinaman joke”.

    Never listened again. He was confounded by circumstance and revealed. Since then I have wondered who or what is behind the Rushman, but not very much. He seemed irrelevant.

    It would be amusing to see Rush and Hitler at dinner with Steve Allen. Churchill and JFK might also attend.

  66. Smith says:

    This is a nasty fat american.

    What makes me sad is seeing this shit here on Unz, written and advertised by a grifter, Andrew Anglin.

    What makes me DOUBLE sadder is seeing people actually care about this fat piece of disgusting shit dying.

  67. American conservatives should’ve been listening to Dr. William Luther Pierce, not ass clown Limbaugh.

    • Agree: republic
    • Replies: @redflame
  68. @Casey Jones

    Point out what in his obit is not true? When I first heard he was going to die soon I had hoped he would apologize for not pointing out that jews had destroyed our country and had us fighting their wars.

    Anglin was tame in what he wrote compared to what I would have written about Rush. If there is a hell I pray to God that he is there…

    • Thanks: Rurik
    • Replies: @Irish Savant
  69. @Biff

    Knowing what we know now about those addle-brained assholes that populate Seattle, I can understand the snipers!

    • Replies: @The Real World
  70. neutral says:
    @Old and Grumpy

    Finally if Rush became Jewish controlled opposition, what exactly is Daily Stormer?

    Ultimately the only issue that is of any importance is where somebody stands regarding the jews. DailyStormer has many faults, but at least they had enough guts to mention the jew, those that were either too stupid or too cowardly to see the jew (almost always the latter) can never be judged as having had good character.

  71. @Random Anon

    That said expecting someone like him to go full 1488 is ridiculous regardless of some quotes from his early career.

    A reminder: “1488” is shorthand for the “Fourteen Words” slogan: “We must secure the existence of our people and a future for white children.”

    I feel an emotional need to point out yet again what a sick culture we live in, where this is seen as the greatest possible evil. That will instantly destroy a man’s life if he publicly espouses it.

    Nonetheless, in this sort of context you would be right in most cases. But not in this particular one. Limbaugh knew that he had cancer and had only months left to live. He knew that if he chose to tell the truth for once, to all his millions of listeners, he would soon be in the grave anyway, beyond any revenge by the demons of this world. As a literally dying man, wouldn’t you use at least a few of your last days to tell the truth to the people you loved and cared about? To as many or as few as would listen, regardless of the consequences? I know I would.

    Limbaugh didn’t. He just kept up the usual lies, right until the last broadcast. And therefore he stands condemned.

    • Agree: Rurik
    • Replies: @Dumbo
    , @Franklin Ryckaert
  72. BiggDee55 says:
    @Intelligent Dasein

    Granted deadlines are a thing. However, if you want to be considered a significant contributor to the passing scene, a pastiche screed is not going to get you noticed or your ideas transmitted. Much of Little Andrew A’s content can’t be refuted, nor should it. Judging a person’s soul ruins his own. We don’t know if a valid priest was with him at the end.

  73. bjondo [AKA "5 dancing shlomos"] says:

    Some random thoughts. Never really listened to His Emptiness.

    Heard Rush gave lots to charities.
    Don’t know if he then took tax deductions for his giving
    meaning
    US taxpayers picked up his tab.

    Not a CPA, I think that is how charity-giving works:
    I give, I receive – maybe ten fold.

    Rush was generous to US workers.
    He bravely supported NAFTA. Bit his lip
    about Walmart’s goods coming from China while
    Walmart pushed “Sell America, Buy America”
    or some such BS slogan.

    Don’t know if he ever talked immigration
    and jobs like Lou Dobbs.

    Why was Marc Stain his guest host?

    Didn’t this neocon worm squirm across the Canadian border
    with fellow neocon warmonger worm David Frum to pen glowing,
    patriotic words supporting the slaughter against Iraq, Arab countries?

    Never a word about prison privitization; gluttonous CEO compensation.

    • Replies: @dorothy111
  74. Truth says:
    @BuelahMan

    Anglin is almost as bug a hypocrite as Rush was. Yet we still have to see Anglin’s shit on Unz when I don’t remember a single thing Rush did being offered here.

    Did Rush need the $600 a week?

    • Replies: @BuelahMan
  75. Fr. John says:
    @Anonymous

    Actually, he’s more right than you are. While I can admire Mr. L, his lifestyle and duplicity are not hallmarks for those who aspire to heaven…. and, as it’s my job to know, Andrew Anglin has the pulse on this, while you…. don’t.

    • Replies: @anonymous
  76. AReply says:

    The author laments that his worldview was defined when he was 4 years old and has nothing to report on his worldview’s evolution.

    His worldview was formed by powerful corporations through radio (TV) influence on his caregivers, and therefore himself.

    His icon, Rush, is a man who was childishly consumed by his appetites, gained his influence illicitly, and used his influence to harm others.

    These influences and appetites are beyond control and there is no meaning of personal responsibility, only traditional values which keep a man in his place.

    There is a lot of latent — and overt! — homo-erotic flux around the white man’s existential plight.

    Even Grandma saw a reasonable in confluence of anti-semitic pro-Zionism.

    Oooh, did I tell a little lie there about Grandma? Well, the substance of my point is true as rain, so no matter, and Allah redeem me from my sins.

    Batshit crazy and genius travel hand-in-hand.

    Ancient Greeks figure heavily in all things.

    It’s best to critique powerful men when they are dead, for various reasons.

    A white man cannot change who or what he is, and his prospects wealth and power are beyond his own control. Only God can judge.

    So did I miss anything? I didn’t carefully examine every word of this excretion of a elegy for a Conservative scion, and one of the most awful men who ever lived including Hitler, for every detail.

    I want to point out that Andrew Anglin’s worldview as expressed in this essay typifies the deep strain of white hillbilly character and ethos that is painstakingly cultivated by the Republican Party, because intellectually in-bred rubes are easily controlled by appealing to their bigotry through anger.

    And strikingly, Andrew Anglin reveals the core value of the white male conservative is that whatever is going on for him is a result of outside forces that victimize him beyond his reproach — esp. in the form of corrupt father figure — which he not only internalizes as his fate, but staunchly argues that holding on to his fate by doing nothing but blaming others is a most estimable value.

    Which brings us back to a 4-year-old’s worldview.

    Andrew Anglin, you have penned a wonderful summary of USA libertarianism and made a lovely gift of wisdom to Unz’ readers.

    Bravo, sir!

    • Replies: @Rurik
    , @James Scott
  77. Rurik says:
    @Pratts

    Does that make the second Iraq war a good idea? Can still be debated. But disappointment with the Bush II years should not induce a knee-jerk rejection of everything from that era.

    ahh yes, the Bush II era

    there are a lot of things that can be debated. It’s wrong and narrow-minded to just be so strident that you don’t see the other side of things.

    Of course what defined Dubya’s era was 9/11. The event that has determined the trajectory of the 21st century. So what if Dubya’s regime allowed the Mossad to slaughter a few thousand Americans. They did it because the American people NEEDED! a new ‘Pearl Harbor-like event!’, in order to motivate them to mass-murder and maim and displace millions of Israel’s well-earned enemies! Without the drama of those buildings exploding and people falling to their deaths, Americans would have preferred to quietly live their lives, and would have been too stubborn (and dare I say it, anti-Semitic) to slaughter all those people on behalf of Israel.

    So the wisdom of the 9/11 false flag attack can still be debated.

    But there’s so much more!

    Let’s all not forget that it was during Dubya’s tenure that we all forked up to bailout those poor banksters, who’d been swindling on Wall Street so many billions in assorted frauds, that when it all caught up to them, Dubya was there to keep them all solvent! No one went to jail, and the biggest criminals were the biggest beneficiarie$ of Dubya’s largess, all paid for on the backs of dying Main Street America.

    Maybe 9/11 and the Iraq war are still debatable, but who would doubt the wisdom of keeping our Wall Street overlords safely ensconced at the top of our economy? Still pulling the strings, and doing all kinds of good for us all?

    We must resist all ‘knee-jerk rejections of everything from the Bush era’.

    Massive immigration, No Child Left Behind, Patriot Act, tax cuts for the wealthiest, Michael Chertoff at DHS, Gitmo, called Ariel Sharon a ‘man of peace’, appointed John Roberts to the SC, yucked it up with fellow war criminal Tony Bliar, and even mocked all the lives lost over the WMD lies he endlessly shilled.

    So we really must resist any kneejerk rejection of that era, an era that Rush Limbaugh certainly did all he could to facilitate and sell to his faithful.

    I’d put Rush in with other hucksters like him. John Hagee rings a bell. Sean Hannity, Bill Buckley [RIH], Bill – ‘I’ve seen the evidence of Saddam’s WMD – O’Rielly, and so many others!

    That their lies have resulted in the inevitable death of this republic, and the loss of millions of innocent lives, and the loss of our hard-won freedoms, as the planet is plunged into an Orwellian dystopia of tyranny and genocide, is hardly anything to be too hard on them for, after all, they did say a couple of things that conservatives liked hearing. And they made tones of money doing it!

    So there’s that.

    • Thanks: Stonehands
    • Replies: @Dumbo
  78. Truth says:
    @Not Raul

    Are you sure that the “woman” in the picture with him isn’t a tranny?

    Good Morning, My Friend.

    It is nice not to be the only one here with two functioning eyes for a change.

    • Agree: Not Raul
  79. Dumbo says:
    @SMK

    I didn’t say what I believe, but I’m sure the official story is full of holes – two planes brought down three buildings? The WTC had just been newly insured? Osama Bin Laden “directing it all from a cave in Afghanistan, then “killed” then “buried at sea”?

    O-kay…

    • Replies: @Not Raul
  80. Dumbo says:
    @John Regan

    “1488” is shorthand for the “Fourteen Words” slogan:

    I think it’s also the birthday of Hitler or something. I’m not sure.

  81. Anonymous[491] • Disclaimer says:

    Simply put, disgusting.

  82. Rahan says:
    @BuelahMan

    Anglin’s personal life includes his hypocritical (some call it “lying”) stance on screwing little colored asian girls while pretending he and his ilk are white nationalists.

    One can bang anyone one wants, as long as this is not leveraged into subverting the structure of one’s civilization. A “white nationalist” can have a harem of Pakistani catamites, as longs as in his social life he does not promote giving the country over to Pakistani catamites, and does not promote propaganda to kids about the delights of Pakistani catamites.

    If a theoretical guy throws all his public energy into maintaining a traditional white society, but in his private time blows negroes in parks, does this make him a hypocrite? No. It makes him a man who can separate his politics from his kinks. Otherwise we fall into “GloboHomo essentialism” where it doesn’t matter what a man does in public, what matters is his “essence”. Thus a conservative who has lived a productive and honest public life is evil because he is “simply bad”, while a corrupt grifter who signals the correct virtues is “a good person” as pure essence, in spite of his actions.

    And what’s with the “little colored asian girls” stuff? Little? As in diminutive, or as in they were 10 years old? That’s GloboHomo-tier double-meaning insinuations, which is the start of the slippery slope to social degeneracy.

    We all fall into this trap at one moment or another, and should have each other’s back. Here I am doing my bit. A GloboHomo approach to arguments just slipped out of you. Keep an eye on that.

    Lastly, white+yellow Kazakhstani chicks are the master race.

    [MORE]

    • Replies: @Truth
    , @BuelahMan
  83. I don’t think tearing apart Limbaugh for his support of the Iraq war is worth the meanness. I supported Bush for president and his son, twice. I still support Bush. I remember the first Gulf war and when Bush didn’t finish the job, the entire media establishment howled, but if you read the account of why Bush didn’t “Finish the Job”, you would understand that Norman Schwarzkopf, recommended that the job not be finished because under the Geneva Convention, if the country invaded Iraq, we would be required to rebuild it. https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/applic/ihl/ihl.nsf/ART/380-600063?OpenDocument
    So Bush pushed the Iraqi’s back and established a No Fly Zone, which was still there through the Clinton administration, who went into Bosnia for the Muslims and bombed Afghanistan, after the USS Cole was attacked and 17 sailors died, in a port in Yemen. Those terrorist bases in Afghanistan were empty at that time.
    The Iraq Liberation Act 1998, https://www.congress.gov/bill/105th-congress/house-bill/4655
    So if your going to invade a country and occupy it, you would have to be ready to put all the infrastructure in place first, you would have to build a coalition of the willing
    https://web.stanford.edu/class/e297a/The%20Coalition%20of%20the%20Willing.htm
    Bush the son ran on a platform of non intervention and no nation building. He also stopped supporting abortion around the world and tried to give his supporters the tax break they voted for.
    It was 9 months in when 911 happened he barely had his government up and running. Imagine if he did nothing. it was the left who wanted to go into Afghanistan and it’s ousted president had made a home at the UN. Oh how the left cried that Afghanistan women didn’t have rights and the people couldn’t watch television blah blah, so instead of getting rid of Saddam, they voted to go into Afghanistan to take out the terrorists in the empty bunkers. Yeah sure , we went in and fought with the Northern Alliance to take out the Taliban. Those two groups had been fighting and the Taliban was in control. Even in Madeleine Albright’s book she admits that the Talban was our ally but they didn’t do enough for women.
    I could go on but I should get my own blog instead of taking up all the space here.
    But anyway for Rush to support Bush for this is not such a bad thing, getting rid of the No Fly Zone would have been good for Iraq and us, not to mention getting the UN and it’s corruption out too
    https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/iraq-oil-food-scandal. Why Saddam ever thought to go into Kuwait is a mystery to me, at one time they were our ally too, against the old Soviet Union, just like the Taliban.
    By Rush.

  84. @Random Anon

    His flaws … stemmed from a naive idealism characteristic of his generation … anything left of the old America will be dead forever once they’re gone.

    So I choose to remember the good things.

    He was funny, he gave a lot to charity, he helped get Trump elected and the America he believed in … was a pretty nice country.

    This is a nice corrective to Doug Anglin’s rather merciless enumeration of Limbaugh’s failures

    I didn’t track Limbaugh much after the early days on television, so I cannot assess the accuracy of much of Doug Anglin’s assessment of his later life and career. However, Limbaugh’s early broadcasts definitely had a positive influence and he served as a mentor and/or guide to many conservative public figures who came after him, e.g. Doug Anglin.

    • Replies: @Dave Bowman
  85. GoodTwin says:

    Epic writing like this is why the Daily Stormer is banned at the service provider level. If we had stood up for Anglin in 2017 the entire political landscape would be different (I didn’t even know he existed though). Thank you Unz for publishing s voice crying in the wilderness!

  86. Pindos says:

    I don’t remember most of the authors “facts”. Liar.

    • Replies: @Dave Bowman
  87. @John Regan

    Probably he thought his $600,000,000 capital would be “of use” in the afterlife. Can’t risk that!

    • Replies: @John Regan
  88. Pindos says:

    Liar

    JTA) — Jewish groups praised Rush Limbaugh for his “outspoken support for Israel” after his controversial remarks on Jews and the banking industry.

    “There has been controversy recently over statements made by radio talk-show host Rush Limbaugh about Jewish voting patterns, political ties and the recent Massachusetts election. We are deeply dismayed by the unfounded criticism of the talk show commentator’s observations,” read a statement issued Wednesday by several Jewish organizations, including American Friends of Likud, the news monitoring group CAMERA, Emunah of America, the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs, National Council of Young Israel, Religious Zionists of America and Z-Street.

  89. Trinity says:

    This article is SPOT ON about Lush Limbaugh. It SICKENS me to listen to the same ilk like Pawn Vanity and his Jewish overlord (((Mark Levine))) fawn over Lush like he was some sort of hero. I will give Lush Limbaugh this much, even though he was an over the top $hameless $habbos goy, Pawn Vanity takes it to another level. Lets be honest though, whether it is the gay guys over at CNN or the misfits on MSNBC to even Tucker Carlson, EVERYONE with a platform that matters WILL NOT CALL OUT THE JEW FOR HIS CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY, HIS ROLE IN THE FEDERAL RESERVE, HIS ROLE IN BASHING WHITES 24/7/365 IN THE JEWISH CONTROLLED MEDIA, ETC.

    I am sure when Lush Limbaugh is being buried he will have some preacher telling those in attendance that Lush is looking down on all of us common folk from Heaven. Honestly, this is the same thing I hear in everyone’s funeral that I have ever witnessed. It seems the only people that go to Hell are Charles Manson and Adolf Hitler. LMAO. Pappy Bush, John Lewis, Elijah Cummings, and John Lewis are all in Heaven, yawl. How do I know? Because the preacher or priests or guest speakers at their funerals told me so. ROTFLMMFWAO. Narrow is the way is what the Good Books says, and this is just my OPINION, but I would guess that from what I see, hear and witness in the real world, the cyber world and on the (((television))), a maximum of 20% of humanity will get to Heaven. But then again, who am I to judge. Matter of fact, I don’t know what my odds are and I consider myself to be more moral than the average person.

    Mother Teresa = Heaven
    Pappy Bush, John Lewis, Elijah Cummings, John McCain, FDR, Churchill, MLK, Rush Limbaugh = What do you honestly think? And remember that God is even a stricter judge than any human and has much higher standards. HE knows all, all the secrets, the lies, the acts that nobody else knows about, what is in the heart, etc. THOU SHALT NOT LIE is one of the 10 biggies after all. And doesn’t it say that the love of money is the root of all evil? Just my OPINION but I think there will be a lot of DISAPPOINTED AND SHOCKED people on Judgement Day and I very well could be one of them.

    • Replies: @GomezAdddams
  90. @bjondo

    Alex Jones used to do a lot of talking too about NAFTA and the super highway, SPP, along with Dobbs, but then stopped. You’d be surprised to know that a lot of agreements are signed by previous administrations that the incoming president and administration can do nothing about. Like Goals 2000 put in place by Clinton and rearranged by Bush, or maybe set up a government run corporation like the millennium challenge corporation ( a deal with the UN) headed by the Secretary of State and the Treasury department. Hey Hillary was in charge of that at one time.

  91. On the one hand, the author says God will judge Rush’s soul – and then he concludes with Rush in hell, in effect making himself as God.
    There is only one, Mr. Anglin!
    Yes, we’re all sinners and we ALL see through the glass darkly.

    Yesterday, I posted my eulogy in DaLimbraw Library for Deplorables:

    I remember as if it was yesterday – I was on the NYS Thruway on my way home from Syracuse, passing Rochester, listening to WHAM.

    Who is this guy saying what I’ve been thinking for years? That was 1989 and you know the rest.

    At this time I also need to clarify something. Some folks have accused me of disrespecting Rush by use of the moniker, which started as crushlimbraw in 2015 and has now evolved into a full identity of Crush Limbraw. Nothing could be further from DaTruth – as is and always was fully explained on my website – which, of course, they never read. Binary thinking!

    I love this headnote today at Vox Popoli: The talent has been returned

    Says it all!

    Truly a Man Designed for His Time

  92. Ragno says:

    If Rush Limbaugh had not altered parts of his worldview, he would never have embraced Trump or populism. It’s not as if strongly endorsing Orange Man was taking the easy way out in American arts & letters.

    Sadly…. whether you’re philo- or anti-Semitic, one rule is inviolate. No one in this world is ever forgiven their successes. In this, Andrew Anglin and the media Jews he pillories are one and the same.

    It’s not that he doesn’t make good points – he does. It’s that, traditionally, white men wait at least 24 hours before urinating on the coffin. (Of their enemies, that is. For non-enemies, it’s customary to hold your bladder until the coffin is lowered into the earth.) What, after all, is the hurry? You would think Rush Limbaugh was the sworn enemy of everything Anglin stood for and believed. Instead, a lot of this obituary reads as follows: thank you for the things you did that pleased me; and fuck you for the things you did that didn’t.

    Something almost…..Jewish….. about that sort of floating gratitude, don’t you think?

    • Agree: Crush Limbraw
    • Replies: @Rurik
    , @Cowboy
  93. Mike Tre says:

    White men attack other white men before wondering why they are losing the war on whites.

    (((Someone’s laughing somewhere)))

    The important lesson is at 58 seconds:

    • Replies: @Rurik
    , @TKK
  94. @RedpilledAF

    “I hope he rots in hell or suffers the hell of a painful and vicious reincarnation.”

    If there is a hell Rush is probably there counting foreskins for the Volcano Demon.

    • LOL: RedpilledAF
    • Replies: @Trinity
  95. Dumbo says:
    @Pat Kittle

    The paradox is, religious songs cannot be composed with an atheist mindset. Imagine Bach as an atheist. He would probably compose rap.

  96. nsa says:

    Dittos Rushberg……the ultimate boomer and stone cold drug addict. His Cuban maid reported he doctor shopped 6 quacks for oxies, but it wasn’t enough and he sent her out on the street for more. The old satyr was eating 50 fucking oxies a day!!! Eventually the dope blew his hearing out but he had megabucks and had a cochlear implant installed. Worse yet, the ultimate boomer shilled for the jew and their wars endlessly and they rewarded him with vast wealth. Nothing epitomizes the boomer pig ethic more than his lack of regard for the hapless turtles attempting to nest on his beach front property. The drug addled old whoremonger refused to turn the lights out in his giant low bank multi-story 10,000 square foot obscene pressed wood mansion so the nesting turtles could orient by moonlight and successfully nest. The planet will be a better place when the rest of the boomers follow the old coot to their final reward.

    • Troll: Trinity
    • Replies: @Trinity
  97. @Franklin Ryckaert

    The love of money is a root of many evils, as a famous saying goes. Andrew Anglin’s favorite philosopher put it well some two millennia ago:

    “Do not store up for yourselves treasures on earth, where moths and vermin destroy, and where thieves break in and steal… For where your treasure is, there your heart will be also.”

    • Replies: @freedom-cat
  98. Trinity says:
    @Alfred Muscaria

    In all honesty, I wish God would have different levels of punishment, I think few people deserve eternal punishment but then again I am not God and I have low standards. That being said, that there is funny and I don’t care who you is.

  99. Rurik says:
    @AReply

    this essay typifies the deep strain of white hillbilly character and ethos that is painstakingly cultivated by the Republican Party, because intellectually in-bred rubes are easily controlled by appealing to their bigotry through anger.

    why are so many incels of color, so butt-hurt over not being white?

    and my God, but the projection!

    you see, you write your transparent angst, veiled in projection- at the object of your obvious rage; unapologetic white men, and hope that somehow all the dejection you writhe with in your own tormented soul, will somehow project itself on the object of your existential angst.

    But you really shouldn’t be so consumed by it. Not all white men get laid by the cheerleader who rejected you. Just a few do 😉 And for you to project all that pent up rage and anger on all white men, whose post-coitus swagger grinds on your ego like a rasp, is misplaced.

    ..forces that victimize him..

    .. he not only internalizes as his fate, but staunchly argues that holding on to his fate by doing nothing but blaming others is a most estimable value.

    Which brings us back to a 4-year-old’s [butt-hurt incel of color’s] worldview.

    Wow, butt that was a lot of projection!

    [my psychoanalytic editorializing- at no charge]

  100. @Franklin Ryckaert

    That’s a heck of a lot of money. Hopefully some of that will be used to set up a scholarship fund for deserving White children.
    I wonder what’s in his last will and testament as I understand he had no children. He married four times and there were no children so I’m assuming he was infertile. That ‘s too bad as there will not be any genes passed on.

  101. Thim says:
    @Not Only Wrathful

    Gluttony is a sin. Limbaugh was a glutton with food and with his heavy smoking, which is gluttony. It is a valid point to notice his gluttony.

    • Replies: @Not Only Wrathful
  102. Since Anglin got religion there is no living with him. Rush did a lot of good. He help give voice to what most americans believed. I knew he had a problem with prescription drugs but so do others. Hookers and trannies ,and sex trips are all new to me. And the pictures they show of him are not recent. He had a weight problem which he didn’t hide but the last years of his life he had under control.

    • Replies: @Not Only Wrathful
  103. @Random Anon

    If you judge him as an entertainer there ain’t a problem if you ask me. He didn’t write or sign any laws like the Bushes and their ilk.

    It is possibly a useful comparison to look at all the progressives condemning Scott Alexander because he isn’t sufficiently pure. A bunch of them think he is a bad guy when he is 100% on their side. On this website we have 100 comment threads promoting Scott Alexander.

    This is an indication of severe brain derangement if you defend Scott Alexander and condemn Rush Limbaugh on the same day. Or, politics as mind-killer. Yudkowsky is another effective communist advocate but if he has a good idea I’m going to steal it.

    • Agree: Not Only Wrathful
  104. @Johnny Walker Read

    One is definitely remiss when pointing out state con-jobs if the Reagan-era lies are not mentioned. Assets of US intelligence were importing massive amounts of cocaine into the US, as part of the Iran-Contra-Israel abomination, and the Sandinistas were blamed by the Reagan regime. Likewise the same regime claimed that the Sandinistas were assembling an armada of MIGs, yet another lie completely disproven but for which the regime was never held accountable.
    Not to mention the role of US intelligence in the aspects of Operation Gladio that were publicly revealed.
    https://www.counterpunch.org/2016/11/04/air-cocaine-the-wild-true-story-of-drug-running-arms-smuggling-and-contras-at-a-small-airstrip-in-clintons-arkansas/
    https://www.counterpunch.org/2019/12/20/gladio-the-story-of-a-conspiracy/

    • Agree: Johnny Walker Read
  105. Rurik says:
    @Mike Tre

    White men attack other white men before wondering why they are losing the war on whites.

    (((Someone’s laughing somewhere)))

    The important lesson is at 58 seconds:

    well, I’ll answer that video with this one

    I see the guy on the bed as Bill Buckley, after he betrayed Joe Sobran to our enemies.

    ‘Wallace’s ultimate rage wasn’t so much for the British, but for those Scotts who betrayed the Scottish people for a few extra shekels from ‘Longshank’s table’.

    Sobran was our Wallace, and Buckley (or Limbaugh) the pampered ‘noble’ on the comfy bed.

    Any American conservative who didn’t know that the Iraq war was a treason imposed on our nation to serve the enemies of our nation (and very civilization, who had perpetrated the USS Liberty atrocity, and then 9/11), is either too stupid for words, or a venal betrayer of all we hold dear.

    Just because Limbaugh mocked the gender idiocy of shitlibs, or other inanities, does not make him a righteous guy.

    and sure, there are a lot of scum out there, but it is betrayal that cuts the deepest

    “A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to fear.”

    ― Taylor Caldwell

    • Agree: Trinity
    • Thanks: JohnnyWalker123
    • Replies: @Trinity
    , @Mike Tre
  106. Trinity says:
    @nsa

    Another (((boomer hater.))) Tell me what is so great about the under 40 white traitor trash that are about the most cowardly trash that I have ever laid eyes on? Lush was indeed slimy, but just as DISGUSTING are these under 40 white traitor trash types that celebrate Whites becoming a minority in America, who sit by and watch Blacks attack White women, the list goes on and on.

    Try again, Shlomo.

  107. @Father O'Hara

    I guess you didn’t bother looking at the article link.

    The event was in Fort Collins, COLORADO. Not exactly a libtarded place.

    • Replies: @Father O'Hara
  108. Dumbo says:

    Mr. Anglin makes a lot of Mr. Limbaugh’s fatness, but gluttony is one of the less serious sins. I think Dante puts them only in the third circle of Hell, much before sodomites and usurers.

    Also, Rush is an endomorph – I never saw a photograph of him as a child, but I bet he was one of those chubby kids. So, it’s probably partly genetic.

  109. @Casey Jones

    I wouldn’t go quite that far. How about we just agree that Anglin is engaging in projection?

  110. @Thim

    Gluttony is a form of self-harm. The healthy response to self-harm mixes in some compassion. Anglin mostly shows compassion through absurdist humour, but this article is bereft of it.

    Instead it is lazy and shows how half-formed and unself-aware Anglin can be.

    As I said, it seems like he is teetering on the edge of a major crisis and could really do with a friend. Everyone deserves some compassion, and, at the moment, he does so more than most.

  111. @RedpilledAF

    Everyday Americans, many who are merely scraping by as working class debt serfs, do the same kind of support for the same kind of Corporate-State enterprises that Rush succumbed to.

    I remember 90% of Americans supported the invasion of Iraq, because they believed the lies coming out of Washington…or maybe they just went along with it, even though they had doubts. People like Trump and Rush are just filling in for the void in Millions of Americans as they CAN’T CRITICALLY THINK SOMETHING through in how events are all interconnected by thin lines of deceit: 9/11 > WMD > Invasion of Iraq.

    Rush, Trump are big men these days because people are in a void. The materialistic world has obscured their perceptions and to ease the Cognitive dissonance they turn to self-made demi-gods to lead them.

    Rush succumbed to Temptation. But he’s far from the only one. And you don’t have to have 600 Million in wealth to prove you have succumbed to that temptation.

    • Agree: RedpilledAF
  112. Dumbo says:
    @Rurik

    Bush II was such a disgrace that a lot of lifelong die-hard Republicans finally started seeing the light and realizing the truth about “Conservatives, Inc.” and the “Uniparty”. Now Trump shattered the final illusions. We are alone… Or, at least, can’t count on current politics to save us.

    As for Iraq having WMD’s… I doubt they had any, it was all another lie, but then again, even if they were planning on having them (and who could blame them – Khadaffi abandoned his nuke project, shook hands with Bush and later was rewarded with the destruction of his country and a bayonet up his ass… This is how the U.S. treats its “friends and allies”).

    If Iraq was planning on having nukes, why was this the problem for the US or anyone else? Or just for Israel? As they say, make your own damn wars.

    • Agree: europeasant
    • Replies: @Rurik
    , @MarkinLA
  113. @Dingo bay rum

    People can get religion and become more understanding and accepting of our darker natures. Or they can get religion and become odd and stilted fanatics. It is disheartening when it is the second.

    If God is real and watching then he knows everything: every thought and intention and desire which we ever have.

    It seems that he is ok with these and therefore is not a judgemental God when it comes down to it. He even sees the darkness in us that we, ourselves, refuse to recognise. Perhaps failing to recognise the darkness in ourselves is actually our greatest sin. If God can do it for us, then surely we can do it for ourselves?

  114. bjondo [AKA "5 dancing shlomos"] says:

    Rush Limbaugh TV- Rush’s Trip to Israel, youtube

    From the Jerusalem Post:

    https://www.jpost.com/breaking-news/rush-limbaugh-republican-radio-host-dead-at-70-659295

    • LOL: Trinity
    • Replies: @Schuetze
  115. Wally says:
    @bayviking

    Yawn. The TDS lives on.

    The alternative to Trump was Hillary.

    What “innocent bystanders” has Trump “blamed”?

    I note that you avoid any mention of Joe “I am a Zionist” Biden and his Israel loving Left.

    recommended:
    Trump Just Thumped the Democrats and That’s a “Win” for the Country
    https://www.unz.com/mwhitney/trump-just-thumped-the-democrats-and-thats-a-win-for-the-country/

    • Replies: @Dr. Krieger
  116. Rurik says:
    @Ragno

    It’s that, traditionally, white men wait at least 24 hours before urinating on the coffin.

    I know a lot of people who liked Limbaugh. Good people who relished a sane point of view, in a culture slogging into the sewer at break-neck speed.

    But that is why ((they)) used him to such nefarious ends, because so many millions of good and decent people listened to, and trusted Rush.

    People like this

    and there’s no bringing back the untold thousands of Americans who lost their lives, fighting in zio-wars, shilled for by people like Rush.

    Not to mention the millions of Middle Easterners who had done nothing whatsoever to harm one hair on an American’s head. (Rush’s lies notwithstanding)

    I’m not pissing on his grave. Not out of respect for him, but out of respect for the millions of simple, decent Americans who liked him.

    If they want to honor the man in their own quiet way, then God bless.

    But this is Unz, and so I try to stick to the unadulterated truth. And the truth was, he was a shill for Zion, at the direct expense of the American people he pretended to speak for.

    Limbaugh [RIP], wasn’t worthy to wipe the dust off of David Duke’s shoes.

    • Agree: Trinity
    • Thanks: Schuetze, Turk 152
    • Replies: @Ragno
    , @Dave Bowman
  117. Cowboy says:
    @Ragno

    It’s that, traditionally, white men wait at least 24 hours before urinating on the coffin. (Of their enemies, that is. For non-enemies, it’s customary to hold your bladder until the coffin is lowered into the earth.)

    Makes you feel old, doesn’t it? This here sure put in relief the generational differences. Some kid above called us naive optimists. I’ll take that. It seems millennials, whether left wing or right wing, all have a stick up their ass.

  118. @Biff

    So, in Bill Clinton’s Presidential term a guy like Limbaugh is being accorded “govt protection”? Did you go to that event and see all that security in place yourself?

    If it’s true that he was “another propagandist state asset” (I don’t discount that possibility, at all) then it strikes me that he was a precursor to the Q phenomenon/psyop (whichever it was).

    Meaning both were intended to provide: a collective of similar believers, ‘special’ info and insight into current events, elements of uber patriotism, Christian religious overtones, finger-pointing at agreed-upon boogeymen, always some vague encouragement of hope – just around the corner! – so basically, like Trump for many people, Rush and Q were versions of religious prophets.

    Sigh, I will never understand the savior worshipping mentality. I wasn’t raised that way so, I don’t think in those terms. In fact, my antenna tends to go up when I see someone regarded in that manner. The biggest problem with that ‘savior crowd’, imo, is that they can be so easily led and are taught to be obedient. So, they are. A great case-in-point is, that they got baited into idiotic Trump boat and car parades in Autumn 2020 WHILE Democrats were getting state election laws changed! Hello? (Gee, I wonder who the organizers of those parades were? Yeah…..)

    “Flock and sheep” are definitely the right words often used to describe them.

  119. @John Regan

    Never been impressed with Anglin who likes to dish out judgment on others, while he basically is no better than those he condemns.

    I’ve always considered Anglin as, very likely, an Operative. His bio reeks of it. The deep state hates Rush immensely because he turned against the deep state while his friend was President, whom they also hate. The deep state loved Rush during the Bush years as he promoted their illegal wars.

    Rush had enormous issues. But this thread appears to be loaded full of deep staters… or at least with their mentality.

    • Agree: TKK
    • Replies: @Trinity
    , @TKK
    , @John Regan
  120. @Schuetze

    Rush was an entertainer and nothing more. He diverted Americans, principally white Americans, from recognizing their real situation and hence from doing anything to change it. In that regard he stands in stark contrast to William Luther Pierce about whose passing and minor foibles no article will ever appear on this wonderful website.

    • Replies: @Truth
  121. I never listened to the man.
    Anyone who takes (((bucks))) is a traitor.

    To me Rush Linbaugh epitomized everything wrong with America. He was a Hagee type; a man who basically knew little but had lots to say. Southern Christian culture sèems to produce these traitorous, do nothing types and the culture tolerates it.
    I would put my flag at half mast.
    The man was a traitor. He sold his own people out to Jews for money. Just like Gowdy, Pence, Ford, Nixon, Reagan, Clinton, Reed, China Bit$h McConnel, Little Marco, Ted Cruz and the rest of the Scum.

  122. Trinity says:
    @Rurik

    There isn’t anything more disgusting than a traitor IMO and Lush Limbaugh, Pawn Vanity & Company, even Donald Trump and Grandpa Ronnie Reagan for their disgusting ass kissing to Jewish power and influence are just as traitorous to their own people than people like Cuomo the Homo, ( hehe. Just kidding Fredo) and the other gay guys over at CNN. Even the Reverend Billy Graham apologized for telling the truth about Jewish misdeeds in this country. What kind of man of God ever apologies for telling the truth? Even Billy Graham might have to answer for that one. But I have a long way to go before I can throw stones, but I am just sayin’.

    • Replies: @Rurik
  123. Truth says:
    @Rahan

    If a theoretical guy throws all his public energy into maintaining a traditional white society, but in his private time blows negroes in parks, does this make him a hypocrite?

    Well…

  124. Don’t get me wrong. I despise Hillary Clinton. But I remember one lie Rush Limbaugh told that was caused by something Clinton said. He said in so many words: “Hillary Clinton says that insurance companies make money by cutting people off the rolls. That’s ridiculous. Everybody knows that insurance companies make money by getting more people on the rolls.”

    Now that’s either completely stupid or a lie. If you don’t know that insurance companies make a mint by kicking people off the rolls, you are either stupid or lying.

    In Limbaugh’s case, I think he was lying.

    I heard him say lots of other lies, too. I just can’t remember because I blocked them from my mind they were so stupid and mendacious.

    • Replies: @gsjackson
  125. From about 8th grade to about a decade ago, I was an avid Libertarian .
    Then I grew up.
    I made up this aphorism:Libertarianism-a perfect theory in search of a perfect world. Which I thought was pretty good.

    The last few years I have been following and blogging some on this site, less and less though.
    This site helped me grow up even.
    After reading this thread today, I realized something new.
    We are all Libertarians, just about some other theory.
    We see the world as a teenager.
    If not for the Jews or the oligarchs or the greedy or the blacks or the gluttony of Rush or the narcissism of Trump, etc, things would be so much better.
    It is all kind of Utopian thinking.
    if it were only as simple as my Austrian economics!

    Not saying there is no objective truth or right or wrong.
    Not saying we shouldn’t strive for improvement or not criticize others .
    It’s that life is really hard and complicated.
    We are all fallible and weak and afraid and frail.
    Some try to do their best.
    A lot don’t.
    What is our true obituary gonna read like?

    Rush was a force for good in sum toto.
    Made a lot of people feel less guilty about this country, which has a lot of good about it.
    Was he flawed ?
    Hell yes!
    Could he have done better?
    Probably, but how much?
    I remember reading about critics of Mickey Mantle.
    Not reaching his full potential.
    Look at his fucking career.
    How much more could he have done?

    Rush did pretty fucking good!
    I cried when I heard he passed .
    I will miss him.
    The forces that are against him and many on this site have an easier time fucking things up even further with him gone.

    • Replies: @Alfred Muscaria
  126. Must be the shadow-banning because it’s always like my comments never get printed.

    • Replies: @kokor hekkus
  127. Trinity says:
    @freedom-cat

    Don’t know shit about this Anglin guy nor do I care, the topic is Rush. More than likely, Anglin, like every other human being is in no position to judge others, nor am I, even though I am giving an opinion. Anglin probably is an undercover lover, but this thread is about Rush. I am sure God will judge those who deceive, lie, and slime their way through life just as HE has now judged Rush. Death is the great equalizer and whether you head the FBI, the CIA, you are the so-called most powerful man in the world, or you live in a shack, we will all be the same in the eyes of God. NEVER be afraid of the truth.

    Hebrews 13:6

  128. Boris II says:

    Looking forward to the day Anglin joins Rush.

    • Replies: @dorothy111
  129. He would talk about the New World Order conspiracy to build a global government, freemasonry, and communism being a Jewish conspiracy.

    I must have missed those episodes? Are you sure you were hearing Rush? I doubt he would have gotten 600+ affiliates starting out with what you describe.

  130. TKK says:
    @Mike Tre

    You are right, and you probably do not realize how bad it is soaked through every level of society.

    I see a lot of confidential documents. Last night, I was reading employee yearly evals from a very large corporation- global.

    Turns out DIVERSITY is an area of ranking. Just like Expertise, Team Work, Deadlines, Resource Mangement etc.

    It gets more sinister- a wage earner’s yearly raise is based on meeting these jelly stupid goals.

    You don’t get your $1.30 an hour raise if you are not diverse. How do you demonstrate diversity? It was so strange I keep digging and it was not definable.

    One gentleman pushed back and asked that question: I get along with others. I do my job. I don’t miss work. How can I be diverse?

    He got back answer from HR: some craziness about signing up for a class and then scheduling an overseas call with an employee from another country and dialoging.

    HR= Enemy.

    Be your own boss. Learn a skill that you can bypass these race traitors. No other race is stabbing their own in the back.

    • Agree: ivan
    • Thanks: GeneralRipper
  131. @gnbRC

    That’s a nice way to put it. Rush was sensationalist entertainment. He was a schtick. Whether everybody agreed or disagreed or respected or was amused by what he had to say was secondary, as long as the EVERYBODY got big and stayed big. Whether HE believed it was even more secondary, as long as people bought it. The only thing that mattered was delivering for the advertisers.

    Calling him a genius is just the righthand version of calling him a monster, which the lefthand has been gleefully doing for the past 24 hours. AA and Rush are in the same general line of work, so it would be surprising if he didn’t get all hyperbolic about it. Stern probably devoted a wacky obituary hour to RL as well, and Leykis probably would have if anybody was still listening.

    The whole idea that entertainment “influencers” are really important is like the fact that fast food is at least some kind of nutrition, and comic books are some kind of literature. True to a point. And it keeps a lot of academics and pop culture ‘analysts’ collecting paychecks, anyway…

  132. Rurik says:
    @Dumbo

    We are alone…

    yep

    Iraq having WMD’s… I doubt they had any, it was all another lie, but then again, even if they were planning on having them (and who could blame them …

    reminds me of something I read awhile back, from a guy who would know!

    [RIP]

    http://www.muslimtents.com/aminahsworld/Arabs.html

    IOW, we send billions of dollars and all our military secrets to a state that has committed overt acts of war against us. Can you imagine, even Saddam or Gadhafi or the Iranians, sitting down and having a conversation like ‘hey, what’s say we use our remote flying technology to send passenger jets full of American civilians to smash into skyscrapers and slaughter thousands in horrific fireballs!

    Just think of the shock and outrage Americans would feel, and then we can blame it on our enemies!’

    I don’t think your typical Iraqi could or would even contemplate such a thing, let alone set about perpetrating it.

    Iraqis may hate Americans today, (and for good reason), but for all their justifiable anger, I still consider them fundamentally decent human beings (ISIS-type Wahhabis excepted). As an American, (raised as a Christian in the heartland) I’d prefer Iran and Syria and Egypt and Jordan and Lebanon and all the rest of the Arab and Muslim nations to all have nuclear weapons – than the nation who perpetrated the USS Liberty attack, and then 9/11 against us. And whose Fifth column does everything in its power to destroy peace, truth, beauty, honor and everything I hold dear in this world. Including and especially my people.

    Muslims at least have a religion that’s reasonably sane. Especially compared to the psychopathic, megalomaniacal, genocidal bloodlust supremacism of the Torah.

    Sure, if it were up to me, no one would have nuclear weapons. But if it were up to me, the very last nation on this earth that I would want to have them, is the shitty little state. Where we provide them with anything and everything they demand – and more.

    And to this untenable state of affairs that has existed for at least as long as I’ve been alive, there hasn’t been so much as a peep of protest from any talk-show host that’s allowed to speak on “our” airwaves, that I’m aware of.

  133. TKK says:
    @freedom-cat

    If someone is an actual threat, they would be in prison or silenced in other ways.

    When Trump got too big for his britches, they ran him out of D.C.

    I imagine he will have a heart attack, stroke, or anaphylactic incident very soon.

  134. Anon[264] • Disclaimer says:

    I found Rush on late night radio back in 1989, he was out of Sacramento then I believe. I was a graveyard shift stockboy, would sit in my car on break listening to the radio.

    I couldn’t believe what I was hearing compared to the networks or CNN on cable – he was the only national mainstream conservative game in town back then besides Buckley, who was more of a conservative mascot on PBS than any kind of leader for Joe Six Pack.

    I purchased my dad a Father’s Day gift of tickets to the Rush to Excellence Tour in 1990 or 1991, a year or two long speaking tour he was doing of the nation – think of a Trump Rally (before Trump) in filled basketball arenas in major cities. Rush really was quite something back in the day.

    Then, in early 1992(?), I heard a caller on his radio show talk to Rush about a book, The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, with Rush declaring ignorance on the subject, but saying he would look into it. By Summer of 1992, dignitaries of Israel flew him over and gave him a personal tour of The ‘Holy’ Land.

    By the time he came back, he was a straight-up Christian Zionist . . . end of story.

    • Replies: @Cowboy
  135. Limbaugh was as much a moron as Trump was\is…

    He had nothing useful to say…

  136. Ragno says:
    @Rurik

    My point remains the same: wait a day or two. You’re not exactly losing momentum by pausing before you pounce.

    By the way, every single war we’ve taken part in, for over a century, was a betrayal of our own founding that succeeded only in taking the very best of us – the bravest, the most selfless and idealistic and innately noble – and removing them forever from the gene pool. It’s why the Republic has been slowly collapsing for generations now – why the years, and the endless wars, have yielded up progressively lesser Americans and finally, thanks to Ted & Manny, pseudo Americans not even a blurry Xerox of America could ever have been founded with.

    Unfortunately, since patriotism is defined, however misguidedly, by support for the nation’s wars and military adventures, you had better be prepared to either publicly despise a long, long, long list of names – many far more prominent than Limbaugh’s – or, in the spirit of forgive us our trespasses as we forgive them in others, you learn to grade with a curve, pretty much as a default unit of measurement.

    Incidentally, and make of this what you will, but Limbaugh’s politics changed over time. This is not just reflected by his unwavering support for Trump, but by his public statements criticizing and even excoriating Bush, McCain, Bolton, etc. Does that let him off the hook for his prior rubberstamping? That’s up to your own individual judgment. As for the Man Upstairs, who can say? Given the American propensity for both regime change and evangelical hoohah (interchangeable in the case of John Hagee), for all we know there are YANKEE GO HOME billboards all over Heaven. There’s only one way to find out, and neither one of us are in any hurry to do so.

    • Replies: @Rurik
  137. Sbin says:

    Oxycotin stained fingers
    That imbecile never saw a Bush nutsack he didn’t want to nuzzle.
    Was the biggest cheerleader for Bush senior gulf war 1.
    Hope he is with Bush McCain and RBG somewhere extremely warm.

  138. Rurik says:
    @Trinity

    Cuomo the Homo, ( hehe. Just kidding Fredo

    I once saw little Fredo blubbering about being called that. But the only reason is because it’s so true. He is a Fredo, and he’s smaart, and wants respect!

    And I’d say it’s even worse for “conservatives” to serve the tribe, because it’s fundamentally dishonest and a betrayal.

    Homos and feminists and assorted urban losers and deviants all want what the tribe is selling. They all want to feast on the dying carcass of the Western world and its people, and they want access to the children. So at least they’re honest about hating whitey and wanting to destroy everything he’s built and put a knee on his ‘racist’ children’s neck.

    But conservatives want to conserve what Western civilization was, and some small shed of hope for their progeny to persevere. So in order to get them to go along with the tribe’s agenda, they have to be lied to, by clever hucksters and traitors. That’s why the Republicans are a thousand times worse than the Squad, or Maxine or Nancy. Because at least the Squad is honest about wanting to destroy white society and feast on its bones. They’re representing their constituents. Whereas the Republicans are lying to theirs, and doing all they can behind closed doors to destroy the people who trust them to look out for their interests.

    It’s just kind of sad that so many good people are taken in by these smarmy, self-serving liars.

  139. Wild Bill says:

    I was kind of looking forward to going to Hell. Meet up with old friends and swap stories, re-live old misery. Now, I hadn’t considered Rush being there, so not so much.

  140. anonymous[178] • Disclaimer says:

    nobody ever names the Jew

    MAGA got derailed because in their first year, Bannon put out the Holocaust day thing that didn’t make it ALL about the jews. Kushner purged the team.

    It became MIGA.

    NOTHING GOOD ever comes from this association as they are a group that ruthlessly pursues their own self-interests and ONLY their own self-interests

    Rush shilled for immoral wars that killed millions.

    the body count ALONE invalidates anything supposedly good he did.

    This is how i sold Trump to people- “oh I don’t like him”…yeah, what you don’t like, your precious feelz against millions of children starved and impoverished. F what you like then, you are immoral.

    Trump became MIGA because he could not break out of this trap or go near the mental third rail to ask if the domination of these people in our society isn’t leading to total ruin JUST AS IT DID to Weimar.

    It’s very easy to say one cannot live with/around blacks…but jews? Oh no, that’s impermissible. Their collective nature is destructive.

  141. KenR says:

    When I saw that Andrew Anglin was writing the obituary, I didn’t want to click on it and I resisted it for a while. But eventually I did and, what do you know, Andrew screws up horrifically exactly as predicted.

    SMH. This is filth.

  142. @The Soft Parade

    God is NOT a puppet master. He is the creator, and he can do great works that men cannot fully understand. However, people are absolutely in control of and responsible for their own actions. God does not micromanage his creation, and he is not responsible for man’s evil decisions. Anything contrary is heresy.

    • Replies: @The Soft Parade
  143. It’s interesting how many people here think that Anglin is a fed or a grifter. It’s rather hard to be a grifter when you can’t even receive bitcoin anymore and rather illogical to employ an “operative” and then do your utmost to stifle his reach.

    How about this: Andrew Anglin is the most dangerous voice agitating against the system whether you like every detail of his message or not, which is why he’s the most sensored man in the world and in hiding.

  144. @freedom-cat

    The obvious problem with the idea that Anglin is controlled opposition is that he’s absolutely being persecuted for real. His Daily Stormer was the test case for the entire Internet censorship apparatus we’ve since seen established, with Big Tech all but succeeding in driving him off the net. Prior to that, he was a major voice. Now he just scrapes by. If he were their man, they really went all-in on establishing his dissident credentials–to the point where almost no one can read him anymore.

    The way I see Anglin, his history and his own writings show that he is an erratic and unstable fellow at best, with a complete disregard for human decency and truth. A lone wolf, and a loose cannon. On the other hand, he is also a propagandist of genuine genius, with a crude but shrewd sense of humor, and his very contrariness and anti-social fearlessness at least sometimes paradoxically coincide to make him one of the most effective truthsayers in this age when the lie has become established convention. In pop-culture terms, you might say he is somewhat like what the Joker would be if he lived in the world of 1984. Only since Anglin is an online personality, he can be much more over the top than a cartoon character like the Joker, who has to stay somewhat vaguely realistic and plausible for the readers to accept him.

    Which is to say, I wouldn’t want Anglin in any sort of position of real authority over me or mine, but I could recognize him as the iconoclast and firebrand he had found his proper niche as circa 2016. It now seems he has declined markedly since then, probably at least in part due to bitterness over getting canceled after Charlottesville. Even so, it deserves respect that he didn’t just throw in the towel.

    (I should perhaps emphasize that I haven’t read Anglin all that much at any time, and less after he got unpersoned. My appraisal may be mistaken, and/or out of date. I’ll check a few more of his articles as they turn up here at Unz to see if it needs any major adjustments.)

    One thing is for sure no matter what. If nothing else, it’s an act of real courage for Mr. Unz to host someone like Anglin, and most especially after the immense lengths the powers of darkness went to in order to shut him down. One doesn’t have to like Anglin to realize that much, or to appreciate it. Once more, our host shows the sincerity of his commitment to the great Western ideal of freedom of speech and expression.

  145. FOUR WIVES…………………then he’ll be prepared well for Hell.

    • LOL: Dumbo
    • Replies: @Dumbo
  146. Ugetit says:
    @Jim Christian

    Agree. Their “joy” is apparently at the top of the list of all that matters.

    Excuse me while I go take a …

  147. Rurik says:
    @Ragno

    nation’s wars and military adventures, you had better be prepared to either publicly despise a long, long, long list of names – many far more prominent than Limbaugh’s – or, in the spirit of forgive us our trespasses as we forgive them in others, you learn to grade with a curve, pretty much as a default unit of measurement.

    the last war that America fought that I consider honorable, was the War of 1812, (against Rothschild’s eternal demands to enslave the nation to his central bank, by force).

    As for others more prominent than Limbaugh, few have frothed against Woodrow or FDR or McBloodstain more than I.

    And I do tend to be a bit (too?) strident when it comes to illegal wars for Zion, (and those who shill for them), but in the grand scheme of things, I suppose Rush wasn’t even close to someone like Dick Cheney or James Woolsey. He even had some endearing qualities, and some very human foibles. I even liked listening to him on occasion, simply to hear what sounded like sanity coming from the radio.

    So in respect to you and all the other decent people who liked him and forgave him his trespasses, I’ll not heap anymore vitriol upon the man, out of respect to those who liked him.

    Rest is peace Rush, and may God have mercy on your soul.

    • Agree: John Regan
  148. Cowboy says:
    @Anon

    His brother, the esteemed preacher man David Limbaugh, is probably a dispensationalist and therefore Zionist as well. It was no doubt inculcated in him long before the trip.

    • Replies: @GomezAdddams
  149. Mike Tre says:
    @Rurik

    Sure Wallace achieved revenge against the Scottish nobles who betrayed him, but what of the loyalties of the heirs of those men and their families and lands? We never find out. Alternatively, Robert the Bruce betrayed him as well but was spared and was able to redeem himself.

    But I don’t disagree with you. There are lots of mainstream commenters who do not go far enough: Limbaugh, Steyn, Coulter, even Carlson. But my ultimate point is we as European descended people spend too much time pointing fingers at each other over matters of degree rather than figuring out how to unite, survive and ultimately, overcome our enemies.

    I guess my question is, are whites as a race better off with or without them? And does Anglin help our cause by issuing such a petulant rebuke of a man with 30 million listeners a day? Criticisms are certainly warranted for Limbaugh (I never listened to his show, fwiw) but timing and tone are important factors.

    If we will only accept those who see the world exactly as we do, then even if we are victorious, the world will be a lonely place in the aftermath.

    As always Rurik, I appreciate your thoughts.

    • Replies: @ATBOTL
  150. @Schuetze

    Rush Limbaugh was the personification of Boobus Americanus

    Well put. He really was the archetypal Ugly American, and associating him with right wing thought (and right wing radio) was a boon to his enemies. With Rush, leftists didn’t have to build some strawman of the White working class American they base their modern cult around despising. They could merely point to Rush and say “that’s who flyover Americans listen to.” I remember how the pill-popping was portrayed in the media back then; it coincided perfectly with his (true) remarks about hyping up Donovan McNabb for being a black quarterback. He was throwing line-drive pitches to corporate media to smash out of the park when his crude personal life could be associated with the correct views he had.

    Every politician, pundit, or jackass with a Webcam who doesn’t name the jew should be considered suspect at best. I don’t know whether Rush delved into IQ, but he wouldn’t touch JQ in his heyday and for that he became their biggest cheerleader. The only people worth listening to are the ones who are unafraid of the truth, no matter the consequences

    • Thanks: HeebHunter
    • Replies: @lavoisier
  151. Schuetze says:
    @bjondo

    That video clip says it all. Limbaugh was taking the shekel for almost his entire career. May he burn in hell with his beloved 6 gorillion liars. From the JP article:

    Limbaugh was not so interested in foreign policy, but was staunchly pro-Israel, seeing the country as an ally against terrorism. In 2001, he urged the George W. Bush administration to allow Israel to crush its enemies, citing America’s own suffering following the 9/11 attacks that year.
    “Bush is right about ‘defeating’ the Taliban, al Qaeda and other terrorist networks,” Limbaugh wrote at the time. “It is, therefore, necessary that in the pursuit of real and lasting peace, Israel also be free to destroy its enemies — meaning the terrorists and, yes, their sponsors, who are at war with her, and that she do so before they obtain devastating weapons of mass destruction.”

    The JP article links to this gem:

    “While one may agree or disagree with Mr. Limbaugh’s views on many subjects, his outspoken support for Israel has been eloquent, informed and undeniable. Moreover, in commentary on the Jewish people, he has been nothing short of a philo-Semite. We are grateful for his strong and singular voice on these issues,” concluded the statement.

    Rush Limbaugh was an advocate for aggressive war. Rush Limbaugh was a war criminal, likely more so than any “Nazi”.

    • Agree: HeebHunter
  152. Dr. Doom says:

    Take a chill pill, Andy. Your Daily Stormer isn’t getting any bigger.
    The Jews have had their last hurrah. The censorship shows they are losing.

    Rush was a good start for White Nationalism.
    The fact he had to appease AIPAC, was a plus.

    It showed the Jews for their perfidy. The lack of content about them shows them.
    Much like no description of the perp means he was black.

    Rush was part of the system. The far right isn’t. Not yet.
    Rush went as far right as the system would allow.

    The neocons run the GOP, for now.
    The voters are walking away from that Israeli Circus.

    A third party will come and go, but White Nationalism will materialize.
    IT must. White survival depends on White spaces, segregation and White Nations.

    The Jews will lose. They are a small and insignificant minority.
    They cannot do anything by themselves. They are cowards to boot.

    They have lost in over a hundred countries many times.
    THEY NEVER LEARN. THEY WILL PUSH AND PUSH, UNTIL THEY ARE PUSHED OUT.

  153. ATBOTL says:

    People aren’t really aware now, but in the Bill Clinton years, Limbaugh was basically a proto Alex Jones. He would talk about the New World Order conspiracy to build a global government, freemasonry, and communism being a Jewish conspiracy. He would mix that with the standard pre-William Buckley type conservative views on race and sex.

    This is a completely false statement in every respect. Limbaugh never said anything of the kind. He was a standard boomer colorblind zioshill. He was also fanatically pro-globalization, telling his followers to vote against Pat Buchanan because Pat didn’t support free trade. In the early 90’s, he shilled for NAFTA relentlessly and viciously attacked anyone who opposed free trade as a socialist.

    • Agree: Dan Hayes
  154. Luigi says: • Website

    People like Rush (conservative or liberal radio, TV and cable) are really nothing more than used car salesmen; more interested in ad’s sales, ratings than our real cause.

    If the conservative/racial movement is to rely on people like Rush, we are doomed. But we are too smart for that. Liberals are doing White Supremacists’ “dirty” work, after all. Look at Bill de Blasio in NYC. Does he give a shit about NYCHA black and brown population who always complain about the rats and roaches in their public subsidized buildings? Cuomo and de Blasio give as much a shit about the black and brownies as the Republican Governor in Texas. Let’s get real people. No need to worry about who’s in power. We have to work likes foxes and rule America the way the descendants of the Conquistadors rule South and Central America.

  155. Trinity says:
    @Rurik

    I actually think Fredo aka Cuomo the Homo is hysterical. I have been tuning in to the ending of his show each night just to hear him and Don Lemon talk about how they love each other, once Fredo was talking giving Lemon a gift for Valentines Day. lololol. I have no idea whether or not these guys are joking and that is the sad part. smdh. Fredo will sit there with a straight face and tell you that Blacks and Antifa killing cops, taking over cities, destroying monuments and statues, and killng and attacking innocent civilians all summer long is noble, but the relatively mild skirmish at the Capitol is as bad as 9-11. Speaking of 9-11? I also love how Fredo has that deer in the headlights look about him and how Don Lemon talks down to poor ole Fredo, and Fredo can’t see it. What a sap that guy is. LMAO. Wonder what Rush’s take on 9-11 was back then?

  156. Bronxite says:
    @Z-man

    Hi z man;. Thanks for mentioning the king of talk radio , bob grant. Limbaugh rarely ever mentions grant, despite having acknowledged the help he received from bob & speaking at his roasts and simar events decades ago.

    Whenever I sent a constructive dispatch to limbaugh ; would always mention the real KOTR,
    Bob grant & remind limbaugh that he was the setup man for bob on want.

    Limbaugh avoided the immigration issue; despite over 50k guatemalan illegals in lake worth fl; just over the intracoastal from his beach house. So many illegals that guatemala opened a consulate in lake worth, so the illegals ( soon to be legalized by biden) would not have to drive down to miami.

    Besides election fraud , the demographics are the overwhelming cause permanent democrat majority,
    We have slipped & sled pell mell to 3rd world status- I gotta get outta here!
    THANK YOU

    • Replies: @Z-man
  157. Dumbo says:
    @Reverend Goody

    LOL.

    About the four wives… Well, it’s like this, when someone is physically not that sexually attractive like Mr. Limbaugh, but he makes a lot of money, lots of women start running after him – because of the money and the fame of course. Money has an attraction all of its own. But then they either leave or they are not a good choice – easy come, easy go. And probably the relationships are awful too.

    I think Steven Wozniak (Apple) also had 4 or 5 wives.

    It happens to many millionaires.

    Zuck the Cuck is an exception but I think he’s so weird looking that not even gold diggers are attracted to him.

    Bill and Manlinda Gates is another exception. But it may be a similar case, like Zuck he also gives a strange vibe.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  158. I thought the piece was excellent. Since I never really paid attention to Rush –or any talk radio host– I was particularly interested in Limbaugh’s stance on the Iraq War and the rest of the Bush 8 years for that matter. This piece pretty much says that Rush was a ‘my party, even if headed for disaster’ guy. That doesn’t speak well of his judgement or truth telling abilities.

    It seems to me that Limbaugh’s only value while the Republicans were in office was to attack the opposition relentlessly. Expecting him to speak with clarity on matters important to the country if contrary to GOP leadership? Well it just wasn’t going to happen.

    • Replies: @Bragadocious
  159. anon[712] • Disclaimer says:

    I first heard Rush Limbaugh as early as 1994 but stopped because he had sold out by then. Whenever he criticized things that had Jewish or Israeli fingerprints all over them, he remained silent on that fact and blamed it on the Democrats, Socialists or Communists. The past five years or so I started to occasionally listen to him again and his tune was exactly the same. I would call him bright, but not a genius, his IQ was probably 115 or so not over 150 which is considered the genius level. Back in the mid-90’s, I remember him bragging that he smoked cigars and he used every opportunity to bash controls on smoking. The cigars ended up taking his life. I wonder how long he would’ve lived had he been a non-smoker?

    • Replies: @GeneralRipper
  160. anon[712] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anonymous

    Anglin has probably recently found Fundamentalist Christianity and is going through his “Hell and Brimstone” phase which usually tones down after a while. I’ve known people like that who answer the phone saying “Praise The Lord” and pass judgement on every celebrity who dies. They always forget this passage in Matthew 7:1 “Judge not, that you be not judged.

    • Replies: @mcohen
    , @TKK
    , @Anne Lid
  161. @John Regan

    “…The way I see Anglin, his history and his own writings show that he is an erratic and unstable fellow at best, with a complete disregard for human decency and truth. A lone wolf, and a loose cannon. On the other hand, he is also a propagandist of genuine genius, with a crude but shrewd sense of humor, and his very contrariness and anti-social fearlessness at least sometimes paradoxically coincide to make him one of the most effective truthsayers in this age when the lie has become established convention…”

    You are exactly right, and that is Anglin’s real value on the web.

    He isn’t doing badly in the Alexa ranking either. His global ranking is 85,450.

    For comparison with other White Nationalist websites: Jared Taylor’s American Renaissance is 107,048; Greg Johnson’s Counter Currents is 310,977; Renegade Tribune is 608,332; National Vanguard is 668,461; and Kevin MacDonald’s The Occidental Observer is 776,086.

    Several articles from Counter Currents and The Occidental Observer have appeared here on unz.com. Anglin’s voice too deserves to be heard.

    • Replies: @Art
  162. Truth says:
    @George F. Held

    Let me give you a little hint, Old Sport;

    ANYONE you have seen on national TV more than twice is a traitor. You don’t get a national or international platform without being one.

  163. mcohen says:
    @anon

    well said brother.amen and also blessed are the fruit.

  164. Not Raul says:
    @Dumbo

    OBL was in Pakistan when he died. How do we know that he wasn’t in Pakistan on 9-11?

  165. @Priss Factor

    I’m not sure what a drug has to do with bigot.
    https://www.etymonline.com/word/bigot
    In Anglin’s view, Limbaugh was a bigot – in the real sense.

  166. idealogus says: • Website
    @SMK

    I am an Orthodox Christian and we (the orthodox church) do not believe that. Not all Buddhists, Muslims, etc. are going automatically in hell and not all Christians automatically go to heaven.
    This is Protestant nonsense – Jewish heresy .
    The Bible says very clearly that our souls will receive new bodies, indestructible bodies that will have access to sensations of sight, hearing, etc.
    Where does it say in the Bible that simply believing in Christ is enough to send you to heaven regardless of your actions? Faith in Christ is very important but not enough. The Bible says very clearly that Satan also believes in God, Christ, heaven and Hell, and yet this does not automatically propel him to heaven.
    Lying, perverse, war-seekers, borderline atheist protestants who believe they will go to heaven just because they confess Christ will have a shock in the afterlife.
    “Or do you not know that the unrighteous[a] will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: neither the sexually immoral, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor men who practice homosexuality,[b] 10 nor thieves, nor the greedy, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God. 11 And such were some of you. But you were washed, you were sanctified, you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and by the Spirit of our God..” 1 Corinthians 6:9–11
    If you are a adulterers, drunkards, thieves etc. you don’t go to heaven.
    If in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ you give up being a adulterers, drunkards, thieves etc. you washed of your sins and can go to heaven.
    Because some in “the name of the Lord Jesus Christ” renounce their sins (or at least strive all their lives to honestly give up their sins) and others do not.
    So some have their sins washed away and go to heaven and others are not. Many nonChristians are going to heaven.

  167. Limbaugh wasn’t the first to get canceled for racism.

    Back in 1988, a sportscaster known as Jimmy the Greek made some comments about blacks and was canned by CBS. He said blacks were “bred” to be athletes.

    More details are elsewhere online, easily searchable.

  168. Certainly a perspective that will be absent elsewhere on the web. That’s the Unz spirit distilled.

  169. lloyd says: • Website

    In Baghdad, people have not rode camels through down down for many decades. Ten years ago, I took taxis through Baghdad. I came to the conclusion I wish they did. Baghdad is grid lock. When a car breaks down, they abandon it. And it stays there permanently to further grid lock. I have just discovered the meaning of HBD. The Arabs are not the people who built Babylon and Ur.

  170. @pepperinmono

    “How much more could he have done?”

    Named the Satanic Banking Cartel that controls us. Not too much to ask.

    • Agree: SS-The Independent
  171. @Boris II

    Well I’ll tell ya, if all these other people and terrorists are going to heaven(?), I’ll look forward to joining Rush. Just imagine all the good company, while the rest of you are in heaven(?).

  172. Art says:
    @Franklin Ryckaert

    Several articles from Counter Currents and The Occidental Observer have appeared here on unz.com. Anglin’s voice too deserves to be heard.

    Why is the focus of a lot of these comments on Anglin, and not on the bad guy – Rush Limbaugh?

    For all most 30 years Rush was flying a false flag for money. He waved the American flag – but was working for Israel. He preached that we must fear the poor, the Muslims, the intellectual left, and the government bureaucrats – when the real grave danger to America was the Jew lobby. He steered conservative America’s focus away from Israel and the US Jews.

    The result is that we are now hopelessly enmeshed in a web of Jew control over the US and its institutions. Most Americans do not even know it – they are still stuck on Rush’s false flag. His silence on the Jew lobby was traitorous.

    We all owe Anglin and Ron Unz major kudos for this article.

  173. ATBOTL says:
    @Mike Tre

    (I never listened to his show, fwiw)

    Then shut up. You have nothing to add to this discussion.

    • LOL: Mike Tre
  174. @Jim Christian

    Easy, N’Guy.
    She really liked his schtick.
    Why the venom?

  175. @JimmyCrackCorn

    Same here, You’d imagine, with death staring you in the face, that you’d finally do the right thing and identify the real source of America’s problems. What had he to lose?

  176. Trinity says:

    I wish I could ask some people like George Bush Sr., John McCain, Sheldon Adelson, Elijah Cummings, John Lewis, MLK, JFK, RFK, FDR, Ike, Churchill, LBJ, Ted Kennedy, Jimmy Hendrix, Janis Joplin, Rush Limbaugh and countless others, was it really worth it? Was deceiving your fellow man, ripping off poor saps in casinos, faking being a man of God while you were screwing prostitutes, having the morals of an alley cat and screwing around on you wife, the drug and alcohol fueled debauchery, innocent children bombed and maimed, stabbing your own nation and people in the back, etc., etc. Is or was it worth it in the end? Obviously certain people like the JFK-RFK-MLK and Joplin and Hendrix didn’t have much time to ponder this question while they were living, but wonder if any of these selfish, self centered power hungry gluttons pondered that question when they became seriously ill and knew that their days were numbered. Were they past having any decency or caring what God thought? I believe you get to a point eventually where even God Almighty can’t reach you.
    Life on earth is very short even if you live your score and ten or more, but eternity is a helluva long time.

    • Replies: @aleksander
  177. V. Hickel says:
    @stevennonemaker88

    his worst crime was being pro mass immigration. yeah he flip flopped on it but to me that makes it even worse

    • Thanks: stevennonemaker88
  178. @Wally

    Wally,

    I think it’s safe to say that Trump is a Shabbos Goy, too. His pardons/commutations, alone, demonstrate this.

    Plus Jared… C’mon n’Guy.

    Dr. Krieger

    • Agree: stevennonemaker88
  179. TKK says:
    @anon

    I have found Southern Baptists and Evangelical Pentecostals to be the most disgusting, wretched, cruel and unattractive people on the planet.

    Snobs.

    They actually use the verb “unchurched” about people who don’t go to church, as if they have the direct line and lowdown on the mysteries of the Universe.

    Never read, never travel, never have their perspectives broadened-

    BUT THEY KNOW IT ALL.

    • Replies: @stevennonemaker88
  180. @John Regan

    The obvious problem with the idea that Anglin is controlled opposition is that he’s absolutely being persecuted for real.

    Anglin isn’t controlled opposition—he’s an uncontrolled useful idiot.

    He is someone the feds can and will suborn anytime they feel like it, even while bombing him at other times.

  181. @Pratts

    So the possibility of Iraq acquiring nuclear weapons justified destroying the country and causing close to a million fatalities? You’re in the Madeleine Albright school of humanity.

    • Replies: @Niebelheim
  182. @idealogus

    Nice try. If only it were that easy. I see you’ve been fully brainwashed into the “Church of Nice.”

    “If you a NICE person, and you don’t do any BAD things, well, it doesn’t matter your religion, you’re going to heaven.” WRONG.

    Either you follow Christ, or you don’t. Buddhists don’t follow Christ. Nor do Muslims. Nor do Jews. You can’t get to heaven by being a good person. You get to heaven by living and telling the TRUTH. And the truth is Jesus Christ. That’s it.

    That’s the Way of the Cross. That’s what got Jesus Christ assassinated. Now “nice, good” people don’t get assassinated. People who reveal the truth to others DO get assassinated. Even worse, Christ said he WAS the truth. (cf. I am the Way, the Truth, and the Life…) Gotta murder that guy, for sure.

    The Catholic Church was founded by Christ. Oh, it’s a perpetually defeated institution, of course, with its abusive gay Mafia, its Marxist Vatican II, and its horrible corruption. Yeah, and it always winds up vanquishing its enemies anyway.

    Protestants always go ballistic saying the Bible is the only thing necessary, why do we need Popes and Anti-Popes (e.g. Frances, the present Anti-Pope), why priests, and why Holy Mass. Well, the Bible came from the Catholic Church, Protestants are loathe to admit. Just ask St. Jerome. He translated it from Hebrew to Latin, around 375 AD, a few years before Martin Luther pegged his 95 complaints to the Cathedral doors on October 31, 1517.

    Protestantism has, of course, shattered into a thousand different sects, with all of them failing or already extinct. Man-made religions will do that. Martin Luther, Calvin, Wesley, Joseph Smith, David Koresh, Gay Episcopalian bishopesses, homo “marriage,” “all are welcome”, ad nauseam. They can’t last. They haven’t. They won’t.

    Despite the Marxist Pope Francis, (hey, Modern Catholics get the awful Pope they deserve), the Catholic Church STILL can’t give in to women priests, abortion, contraception, and homo marriage, try as they might. They just can’t seem to pull the trigger, even with the goofy protestants going globohomo long ago.

    The “Church of Nice” is a product of modernity. It’s a place to pretend you’re STILL a “nice” person, who’s going to Heaven , despite leading of modern life of practical atheism. How many people give thanks to God before eating in a public restaurant? There’s your answer, my friend. Christians went into the closet and homos came out.

    How many go to confession regularly? How often is sin mentioned, if ever? Protestants want to talk a stroll on the beach and ask God to forgive all their sins. Oh, really. If it were ever that easy. How perfectly modern and encapsulated.

    Sorry, sniff, sniff, to butthurt protestants, but sin richochets throughout the community (divorce, anyone?) so off to the community you must go to ask forgiveness. Psychologically, you must go to ANOTHER person and confess your sins, precisely because of the tremendous defect we have for self-deception.

    OK, you’re a successful, married businessman who’s banging his secretary, oh, excuse me, administrative assistant, on the side. Take a stroll on the beach and ask Jesus to be your personal savior, and all is forgiven? What a crock of self-deception. No, you’ve really hurt your marriage. You’ve hurt your wife. You’ve hurt your children. You’ve broken your vows. You screwed the community in which you live. Your actions will echo in eternity.

    Oh, so you say you’re a wretched sinner with no chance at redemption without freely given Grace? Bullshit. Put your dick back in your pants and take a cold shower. Straighten up and earn heaven.

    Yeah, yeah. I can hear the Protestants shreiking from here. Of course, they always, always forget St. Paul:

    With fear and trembling, work out your salvation.” – Saint Paul

    That doesn’t sound “freely given” to me.

    The individualistic, private Protestantism of the US has led precisely to our coronavirus predicament right now. Separation of Church and State. How’s that working out for ya, now, Prots? You wanted your private little strolls on the beach and your paid choirs at service, when you eventually decided to show up on Sunday. The State, of course, continued unimpeded in its mastery of the media with all its messages of anti-white, anti-Christian, anti-Catholic, anti-men, poison. You did nothing. No one really has, and that includes the Catholic Church.

    • Replies: @redflame
    , @anonymous
  183. @Mark James

    I think a lot of conservatives never paid attention to Rush. I always considered him a personality for flyover country–the evangelicals, in particular. When the shit was hitting the fan in 2002 I was over at Antiwar.com reading Raimondo, who was dropping truth bombs and naming the lobby while Limbaugh was reading press releases from Bushcons. By 2002 he was irrelevant–to me, anyway, and I suspect many others. The problem with Rush is that like so many of his ilk, he literally knew nothing about world affairs. Yeah he was fine on domestic issues I guess. But in sorting through the Iraq debacle he was in way over his head.

  184. He bought the ticket and took the ride. Or rather the reverse. He took the ticket money and got ridden around like a donkey by a bunch of Jews. These Jews were doing massive wars, and he sold them. This man convinced people that Iraq – a third world country where people were riding camels through the streets of the downtown of the capital city – was going to invade America.

    Imagine selling that idea. You have to be a genius to be able to get people to believe something so moronic.

    All about the Jews eh?

    What you don’t realize is that Con Inc types embrace race denial because they have little choice. Their fantasy of “minimal government” being the source of all progress falls apart under the lens of race. Everything becomes far more complicated when you accept that “big government” is not the cause of all problems. When South African Whites were in charge they had “big government” and made more progress than nearby “minimal government” Somalia.

    Con Inc commentators would never allow someone to get on their show and ask why “minimal government” Somalia isn’t an economic powerhouse.

    The whole thing is a scam and I really don’t give a damn about what role the Jews play.
    Rush knew he was being dishonest about economics and race. There was never a Jew holding a gun to his head. He had millions of dollars and could have dropped the race denial act. But these White guys love their libertarian economics and will happily deceive the public in order to push them. They *want to believe* that we don’t need the government and prefer lies to truth. In their minds we can have some apple pie bootstrappy ‘merica and if someone asks about health care access for workers then just call em a dirty socialist and go to the next caller. That’ll teach em.

    Rush represents pre-internet conservatism. The period where they decided to embrace race denial and never imaged that the little people would get access to an online library where they could fact check everyone. A period where race doesn’t exist and “minimal government” will fix everyone. Oh and don’t forget tax cuts for the rich, very important.

    • Replies: @anonymous
  185. TKK says:
    @Not Raul

    It’s not triggered. It’s stupid.

    Anglin is jealous because Rush climbed to the top of his wheelhouse and made a fortune while Anglin probably has to use a fake name to get home owners’ insurance. (If he could swing a mortgage).

    You will miss Rush when people like this are kicking in your door.

    • LOL: hhsiii
  186. @Trinity

    You might mean “4 score and ten.” A score is 20 years. 4 score and ten = 90.

    Still, very much a “puff of smoke” in comparison to eternity.

    You’re absolutely right. Celebrities in hell are now furious they ever left that job at the local news station, with the nice wife and happy children in a decent, little house, with some neighborly BBQ’s in the backyard.

    It should have been enough. But they had other plans.

  187. Tom F. says:

    Radio was dead, as both entertainment and influence, until Rush Limbaugh brought his great voice, awesome chops, and original presentation to the medium. And best of all, he brought listeners (600+ AM stations at one point) and advertising money to forgotten radio signals all across this great nation.

    The h_aters couldn’t stand his influence, and when I’d hear one of the ‘Very Smart People’ unload on him, they would misrepresent his views, repeat obvious jokes as if they were Rush’s serious opinion, and otherwise attempt to subvert his conservative message.

    I listened to his show for decades, enjoyed his TV show(s) and books, and best of all the dyspepsia he caused with all the impotent, overeducated, charismaless snobs who couldn’t admit they were jealous. Their disdain for Limbaugh is actually disdain for the listeners.

    Always have love and respect for Rush, requiesce in pace, Maharushee.

    • Replies: @John Johnson
  188. @Schuetze

    ” . . . The only thing Rush Limbaugh really cared about was Rush Limbaugh.”

    Yeah, and he had–what was it, $500 million or so?– to show for it.

  189. Did Rush Limbaugh really make a difference?

    Ironically, Limbaugh paved the way for the triumph of the New Liberals who should now be called Uberalls as they stand for Shlomo-Globo hegemony uber alles. Maybe, Limbaugh should be called a ‘Limberal’ given he unwittingly lent a hand to the Globerals and Uberalls in their total usurpation of power. How was Limbaugh a tool in this?

    He was a total cheerleader for US corporations, ‘free trade’, ‘private enterprise’, Wall Street, Las Vegas, and money-money-money on the supposition that those are intrinsically ‘conservative’ forces. His was a pro-rich message though his main appeal was to the rubes. Thus, he helped create the situation of “What’s the Matter with Kansas”, i.e. so many American social conservatives who were have-lesses supporting policies that favored the have-mores and have-lot-mores in the mistaken belief that Big Money was on the side of Americanism.
    Perhaps, Limbaugh’s blind spot could be forgiven as his formative years were the Cold War when global conflict according to the US Narrative boiled down to God, Enterprise, & American Patriotism versus Godless Communism & Anti-Americanism. Also, when Rush Limbaugh was young, the face of capitalism was General Motors and good ole boys making things in factories. And the GOP was powerful in California — none other than Ronald Reagan won twice there as governor and dominated in 1980 and 1984 — , and the initial high-tech start-ups had many libertarian-leaning individuals who preferred GOP’s pro-entrepreneur policies.

    Limbaugh was blind, willfully or otherwise, as to how much things had changed in American Capitalism with the ascendancy of boomers(among whom Jews were especially powerful). And had he inspected matters more carefully, he would have realized that Eastern Bloc communist nations were, in more ways than one, culturally and socially more conservative than the Liberal West(that, under the power of PC, became both less conservative and less liberal, rejecting both traditional values and civil liberties in favor of the Tri-Supremacist Idolatry of Jews, Negroes, and Homos enshrined as the Holy Three). Limbaugh clung to Cold War formulations of the Left vs Right, and his continuing influence after the Cold War turned out to be corrosive. In his twilight, he warmed to Donald Trump, but it was too little too late(and besides Trump turned out to be a clown).

    In the 1990s, a boomer civil war broke out between Rush Limbaugh(and Newt Gingrich) and Billy Boy Clinton(and Jews securing their position as the new ruling elites). With the defeat of George H.W. Bush, the so-called Greatest Generation’s fall from power(and grace) was swift, and the boomers, biggest generation in US history, took total power(though Clinton did appoint some of the older generation). Bob Dole was useless in 1996, and the death of Richard Nixon marked an end of an era.
    According to Limbaugh, Bill Clinton and his crowd represented the Radical Sixties, Socialism, and Anti-Americanism. But the real conflict wasn’t about capitalism vs socialism but about trying to win over Big Capital. Under Bill Clinton, the Democrats had pretty much given up on Big Labor and fixed their gaze on Wall Street, Big Tech, and other Big Money players as the main prizes. It was as if both Limbaugh and Clinton in drag were doing lap dance for Bill Gates and the like. They were both going ‘me so horny, we sucky sucky long time’.
    In time, Boomer Big Money went with the Democrats, something American Conservatives were reluctant to face until the likes of Ann Coulter and Tucker Carlson finally began to gripe about traitorous Chamber of Commerce and ‘woke capital’. But even now, so many American Conzos yap about ‘socialism’, ‘communism’, and blah blah. Right, the mega-billionaires of Facebook, Google, Amazon, Microsoft, Hollywood, Wall Street, and etc. are all a bunch of ‘communists’. And those vain homos and trannies funded by the super-rich represent what? Leninism and Stalinism?
    Bill Clinton, a sleazebag but an astute observer of human nature, understood that the rich aren’t only materially greedy but morally vain and status-anxious. As long as Democratic policies were overly punitive on the wealthy, many among the rich would reluctantly stick with the stuffy-and-square GOP as the pro-business party. But once the Democratic Party became reasonably pro-business, many(even most) rich folks would come over to the Democrats(even if GOP remained more pro-business) because the Democrats control the gods and own the ‘cool’. Especially with Jewish control of academia and media, the gods of the US became the Sacred Semites, Noble Negroes, and increasingly Holy Homos. As the Democratic Party was the home of most Jews and blacks, it held the moral high ground. And as Jewish Power made homos ever holier, the young generation increasingly went with the Democrats as the happy globo-homo party.

    Of course, the GOP had given up ‘racism’ long ago, but why would blacks accept racial equality from the GOP when they can get racial sanctity from the Democrats? Some Jews, as ‘Neocons’, did join the GOP because it was even more pro-Zionist than the Democratic Party, but it was a matter of inches(and besides, the Neocons were merely using the GOP without offering much in return: “I eat your lunch, and I eat my lunch.”). If the Democratic Party was 200% for Israel, the GOP claimed it was 210% for Israel. It hardly made a difference. Also, despite GOP’s ultra-hardline support for Israel, many American Conservatives opposed or or were at least less enthused about Jewish-favored policies in the US, such as gun-banning, more mass-immigration, anti-white rhetoric, Christianity-bashing, and promotion of globo-homo. Indeed, GOP’s extreme obeisance to Israel and Zionism was really a crutch, a desperate compensation for its disfavor among most Jews. If anything, it betrayed GOP’s anxiety as the party of disdain among Jews. In a sane world, those attacked by Jews should attack them back, but as Jews became holy in the US, you had to praise them and seek their approval EVEN when they attacked you. As the GOP couldn’t win favor from Jews on domestic issues, it went full-steroids on Israel. GOP gushed as if Jews are the very best, and yet most Jews stuck with the Democrats. If indeed Jews are the best yet most remained with the Democratic Party, didn’t it imply that Democrats are morally superior? After all, it seems a happier home for the Very Best.

    Anyway, as the party of the three most ‘sacralized’ groups(of Jews, blacks, and homos), the Democrats had a decisive moral advantage over the GOP, and this state of affairs hasn’t changed after four years of Donald Trump whose message was, “I love Negroes, even as they riot and loot! I love Jews even as they ram me in the arse! And, Trannies can use women’s room at Trump Tower.” Rich people love money but are also anxious about their reputation, and as the Jews/Democrats controlled the gods, most rich folks moseyed on over to the Democratic Party. Besides, it was also the party of big Hollywood stars and rock stars, thus more fashionable and ‘cool’. In contrast, GOP was associated with ‘racist’ redneck Neo-Confederate South & ‘homophobes’ and Nashville hillbillies. (Its moralism came down to Ann Coulter and Dinesh D’Souza yapping about how the Democrats are the ‘real racists’ because the KKK members were historically Democratic.) And when the Jew-run media made Trump and ‘Deplorables’ out to be Worse-than-Hitler and the new nazis, most rich folks(shallow and vain) wanted nothing to do with it. And the likes of Mitch McConnell and Mitt Romney know only one trick: Try to win back the rich with even more tax cuts and other cucktivities.

    Limbaugh of the Cold War mentality thought that the triumph of global capitalism was synonymous with victory for conservatism against Godless Communism and leftover radicalism from the Sixties, but the success of everything he’d championed came to mean the death knell of American Conservatism(and also of American Liberalism as the current power is anything but liberal in the traditional or even radical sense). The great irony is that Limbaugh lost precisely because he won. The Big Money that he so idolized won many times over, and its power led to censorship of conservatives, deplatforming of patriots, denial of financial services to rightists, defamation of people like him, and the rise of global-gangster-fascism(as opposed to good humanist fascism). Limbaugh and the dittoheads assumed that Big Capital was at war with Big Government, and the triumph of the former would ensure more liberty, more freedom, and more patriotism. Actually, the result was the fusion of Deep Pockets and Deep State. Also, Limbaugh and his ilk hoped that Jews could be wooed over to Conservatism because Jews are rich and GOP is 210% pro-Israel(than merely 200% that the Democrats are). They failed to realize that Jews have an agenda all their own. Jews weren’t looking to pick sides but take over both parties and manipulate them to Jewish supremacist ends.

    In the end(and from the beginning), Limbaugh was more style than substance, and Trump turned out to be no different. For all his maverick playacting, he cared more about money, success, fame, and celebrity than integrity and truth. Though he stood up to the GOP on occasion, he was more often than not a reliable cheerleader and whore for all its destructive policies.

    Could Limbaugh have made a difference? Yes, but he missed the chance. Looking back, the most prescient presidential candidate of the last fifty years was Ross Perot whose campaign took on both the GOP and the Democratic Party as the tweedle dee and tweedle dum of globalism and ‘free trade’. Though Perot was far from perfect and a rather unstable personality, he was more right than wrong about the dangers posed to American sovereignty by the rise of globalism and the New World Order. Because the GOP was more invested in ‘free trade’ than the Democrats back then, Perot was hit harder by the Republicans. Limbaugh, a Reagan Romantic of the Cold War mindset, joined with the GOP in mercilessly mocking not only Perot’s looks and personality but his warnings and policies. Rush, the attack dog of the GOP, assured all the dittoheads across the fruited plains(soon to become tutti-fruity plains) to denounce Perot and go with George H.W. Bush, ‘free trade’, and New World Order policies.
    Thus, Limbaugh missed the boat. Another chance came with Patrick Buchanan’s remarkable speech at the 1992 GOP convention where he spoke for the common man and the American Worker threatened by globalist ‘free trade’. Again, Limbaugh reliably sided with the GOP and repeated all the talking points about how Walmart and the like are the wave of the future, and the American Worker had nothing to fear and nothing to lose and had everything to gain. Or, maybe they can learn to code and become big earners in High-Tech.
    And of course, ‘true conservatives’ know that capitalists are all such swell fellows, mostly patriots and natural conservatives(or at the very least libertarians committed to small government and liberty). They would never betray the GOP for all it has done for them with lower taxes, de-regulation, and the like. Limbaugh and dittoheads were fooling themselves.

    While capitalists are surely people of talent, drive, ambition, creativity, and even vision, the world of money isn’t exactly one of integrity or loyalty. As it’s mainly driven by materialism and status-anxiety, loyalty and integrity are the last thing on the mind of capitalists. Capitalism is useful and productive but shouldn’t be the core of any meaningful identity, ideology, or value system. Like Michael Corleone says in THE GODFATHER 2, “all our people are businessmen… their loyalty is based on that…” One may admire businessmen for their ability but never mistake it for integrity.

    [MORE]

    If Limbaugh had taken a nationalist-populist stance in support of Ross Perot and Pat Buchanan, perhaps he would have been booted off ‘conservative talk radio’ that, more often than not, was a propaganda wing of Zionists and the GOP, much like most of so-called MSM is little more than Ministry of Information for the Democratic Party and ADL. Still, he would have been a man of integrity, and had he overcome the obstacles with a populist message, he and his following could have served as a formidable counter-force against globalism pushed not only by the GOP but the Democrats.
    But, by working with the GOP to crush people like Perot and Buchanan, Limbaugh unwittingly strengthened the future Democrats who would turn out to be the main beneficiaries of ‘free trade’, deregulation, Big Tech monopoly, and anarcho-oligarcho-tyrannism. Limbaugh banked on the false hope that triumph of New Capital would ensure dominance of the GOP and American Conservatism. And most dittoheads fell for the myth that the power struggle was about American Capitalism & Conservatism(and Neocons & Israel) versus International Socialism & Liberalism(and all those ‘Anti-Semites’ eager to throw Israel under the bus) when, in fact, the real tug-of-war between GOP and the Democratic Party was for the ‘hearts and minds'(or wallets and vanity) of the rich donor class.

    The sad irony is that the rich capitalist oligarchic class won bigger than ever(exactly as Limbaugh and dittoheads wished), and it was this very class(especially dominated by Zio-Globalist Jews) that waged total war on American Nationalism, the white race, Christianity, and populist-conservatism. But American Conzos learned nothing. Again with Obama’s win in 2008, there was more nonsensical talk about ‘socialism’! True, Obama had links with certain radical figures from the Sixties, some of them Jewish, but most of them had moved on from communism to Zionist-capitalist-supremacism. (Besides, Neocons had Trotskyite backgrounds.) Wall Street was bailed out under Obama, the puppet of the Jews, and Jews got even richer when Main Street took it up the arse. And it was Big Capital that funded globo-homo and tranny-wanny nonsense. It was the capitalists who promoted ‘gay burgers’. And it was the capitalists at Chick-Fil-A who, despite so much support from the conservative consumers, caved under Jewish Capitalist pressure and became Dick-Fil-Ass. And while uber-capitalist banks were shutting down accounts of conservatives and rightists, some of the biggest corporations were pumping many millions, even billions, into groups like BLM and SPLC. It was super-rich Hollywood Jews and Silicon Valley Zionists who pumped record cash into Georgia to ensure Democratic Senatorial wins. Joe Biden raised record money in 2020 thanks to Big Capital and super-rich Jews. And Big Capital conspired with the Deep State and Big Media to turn 2020 into a hellhole with Covid nonsense and BLM nuttery just to punish America for having elected Trump. So, the notion that capitalism is automatically conservative was a boomer myth, a byproduct of Cold War mentality.

    But the kind of ‘conservatism’ set by Limbaugh and dittoheads failed to see the big picture because it was stuck on framing the world in terms of capitalism = conservatism versus socialism = liberalism. What’s-the-Matter-with-Kansas was a case of “What’s the matter with Limby-Dim and the Dittoheads?” Now, it’s true that Limbaugh’s reach and influence waned in the age of the internet, but much of the talking points remained. So, Steven Crowder the chowder-head still thinks the big enemy is ‘socialism’. Andrew Torba, though laudable as founder of Gab and defender of free speech, gripes about ‘communism’, ROTFL. (China may be ruled by the CCP, but China gave up communism long ago… or haven’t they heard? CCP today is about as Maoist as the current Democrats are Pro-Confederate and Pro-Working-Class.) And so many even in the Dissident Right speak of THE LEFTISTS. Anyone with sense would have realized long ago that true leftism is deader than conservatism, though it may not seem that way on the surface as radical ‘wokeness’ seem to be everywhere. But it’s all just labels over trivia and trifles. Jewish supremacist capitalist-Zionism hides behind the ‘leftist’ label to create the false impression that its side is about ‘equity’ and ‘justice’ when it’s totally about supremacism, hierarchy, hegemony, and privilege. If the Democrats are really about equal justice for all, what’s with all their ‘Muh Israel’ catechisms and submission to Zionist Jews and total support for More Wars for Zion?

    Alt Right could have introduced something new, but idiot Richard Spencer and his retardo crew decided to larp as Nazis and fall into the enemy’s trap, which made it even harder for Trump to try something different.

    At any rate, one thing Perot got right was going beyond the stunted worldview of left vs right. The Reform Party was a third party that appealed to both rightist and leftist sentiments. Though Nazism 2.0 turned out to be insane with its imperialism and wars, Nazism 1.0 was essentially sound precisely because it combined rightism with leftism. National Socialism was about German Pride but also about the German worker, the backbone volk of the nation. Perot instinctively understood this, and free-thinking Democrats and Republicans were willing to give him a chance.
    It attempted a counter-convergence against the convergence happening within both the GOP and the Democratic Party. After the end of the Cold War, the establishment elites of both parties were converging on ‘free trade’, globalism, the gods of PC, and total sucking up to Jews. For all the bitterness between Billy Boy Clinton and Newt Gingrich, they were totally agreed on More for Wall Street and More for Big Money. Perot’s challenge envisioned a different kind of convergence. Not among the elites but among the masses. The American People, instead of being divided by and manipulated with the false dichotomy of ‘left’ vs ‘right’, would converge as a broad mass of patriots in defense of national sovereignty and economic justice. Convergence of the people against the convergence of the elites. If not for Perot’s instability and the dirty tricks played by both parties(especially by the GOP), it’s possible Perot could have changed the course of US history. And Limbaugh could have been part of something truly remarkable but he opted to be the lapdog of the GOP and cheered on the Walmartians.

    A third party is useless if it appeals only to one side. Another ‘liberal’ party will merely take votes away from the Democrats, ensuring victory for the GOP, and another ‘conservative’ party will shave votes from the GOP, ensuring victory for the Democrats. The only chance for a Third Party is to win over disillusioned people from both sides. Also, its message must be both left and right. After all, there is much that is good about leftism(without which Western progress is inconceivable) and much that is good about rightism(without which there is no civilizational continuity and stability). Conservatism allows for tradition, caution, and continuance. Liberalism allows for novelty, experimentation, and daring. It’s like how evolution works. Without mutations, organisms would have remained the same. And yet, most mutations are harmful and must be rejected. Without leftism, there is just moribund conservatism, and many civilizations grew weak and weary as a result, like Ancient Egypt and Byzantium. The West made great leaps because of the revolutionary spirit. And yet, without the stabilizing gyrational force of conservatism, leftism can turn cancerous and crazy, mistaking every novelty as the ‘most evolved’ truth. Imagine an organism where the mutations take over. It will turn into Elephant Man.

    Looking back on 2016, it would have been better for Trump to run as a third-party candidate. Because he ran as a Republican, he was compelled to play the ‘rightist’, thus needlessly alienating many people with leftist inclinations. Had he run on a combination of nationalism and socialism, he could have done so much more. Of course, had he won as a third party candidate in 2016, he would have been squeezed by both parties in Congress for four grueling years, but many more Americans would have been with him. Being alone with the people isn’t the worst thing, and his tragedy would have been heroic. Instead, as a sham ‘rightist’ in a cucked GOP, the tragedy of 2020 was a clown-show, a farce.

  190. KenH says:

    Rush did lose me when he started shilling for the Iraq War in 2003 and I stopped listening to him until Obama won his second term. Even though he seemed to renounce his former warmongering positions he always whooped and cheered whenever we killed those A-rabs.

    Rush celebrated the assassination of Iranian war hero Solemeini and puked out the Trump claim that he was planning terrorist attacks on U.S. forces in the region. Even if he was U.S. troops have no business in the region and if Iranian troops were in Mexico we’d be trying to kill them, too, so this is another example of USrael hypocrisy.

    Rush’s other glaring fault was that he loved the Jewish people far more than his own. Once of his ex-wives was Jewish and the marriage was a disaster. He would occasionally wax lovingly about his admiration of the Jewish people and how Israel has the right to do anything it wants to its neighbors.

    Rush still did good but placed blame on America’s woes on “libruls” instead of Jews who control the radical left wing establishment that are destroying everything Rush and we hold dear.

    • Agree: SS-The Independent
    • Replies: @John Johnson
  191. @aleksander

    You might mean “4 score and ten.” A score is 20 years. 4 score and ten = 90.

    The oft-quoted scriptural passage is “The years of a man are three score and ten, or four score if he is strong.” In other words, 70 or 8o years. In other words, nothing has changed in the last three millennia.

    People used to know these things. What has happened to basic biblical literacy in this day and age?

  192. As an Independent – political atheist ( with my name initials, Sunny S. ), born in Eastern-Europe, I say that another ‘ Judas goat just went ( back ) to Hell…Sorry, conservatives, but this presstitute wasn’t what many of you believe ( like Walter Cronkite, another scumbag )…a honest man, who dedicates his life to helping ( informing ) others…I remember when some woman was asking ( Rush, on the phone ) about her son and his generation support for Ron Paul, in the Presidential (S)election of 2012…’ what do you think, Rush, maybe the kids are right ?!…’…” Oh, no…Ron Paul is definitely not the guy…”…Of course, not, ya Establishment shill…because Ron Paul said ‘ audit/end The Fed ‘…You, like many other presstitutes, were/are NOT paid millions over millions, to say the truth to the people ! On the contrary, keep them ignorant, obedient, slaves on the Neo-Feudal Plantation. IF this Country is in this deep sh.t, like Mariana trench, is because of people like Limbaugh, Cronkite, Anderson Cooper and many ‘ bastards of Mockingbird Project/Operation ‘…and the sheeple who follow them, without questioning anything ! PS: that’s why ‘ they ‘ ( the psychopaths/criminal ‘ elite ‘ ) got away with JFK, RFK, MLK-Jr. assassinations, Sept. 11 false flag operations and everything else…That’s way this Country is destroyed from within, RIGHT NOW, under the pretense of a ‘ pandemic ‘…Good riddance, Rush…R.I.P., America !

    • Agree: Schuetze, Rurik
  193. @Priss Factor

    And he had a chance with Ron Paul, but he…’ missed ‘…that one, too…You know…three strikes and you are out 🙂 He was that Judas goat, of which Michael Collins Piper was talking about in his book…before he was…’ suicided ‘, like Victor Thorn, Gary Webb, Danny Casolaro, Michael Hasting, and many, many others…

  194. @Tom F.

    The h_aters couldn’t stand his influence, and when I’d hear one of the ‘Very Smart People’ unload on him, they would misrepresent his views, repeat obvious jokes as if they were Rush’s serious opinion, and otherwise attempt to subvert his conservative message.

    Just a bunch of jealous haters? Yea why don’t we all bow to a race denying childless materialist that convinced dirt poor farmers that “minimal government” will always give them the best health care.

    Con Inc is just the inverse of liberalism. It doesn’t care about truth nor does it have any interest in solving our most pressing problems.

    Dittoheads are convinced that “Big government” is the cause of unequal racial outcomes. You see race doesn’t exist and Bugaboo Public Schools are to blame. Well charters schools were tried in Black areas OVER TWO DECADES AGO. But I’m sure you can find some AM radio host talking about charter schools as if they were invented yesterday.

    This is just one of many examples of Con Inc dishonesty.

    Liberalism will not be beaten by adopting their same tactic of lying about uncomfortable aspects of reality. Con Inc has not beaten liberalism and if anything is the perfect fall guy. They need to step aside and let the populists take over. Race denial and libertarian economics have been a poisonous combination.

    Con Inc is a scam and a failed one at that. Unless you consider proud Navy trannies to be a success of all this effort put into lying. Maybe we just make the Navy gay only? Why not, you idiot Con Inc boomers would accept anything if it came with tax cuts.

  195. Z-man says:
    @Bronxite

    Thanks.
    I didn’t listen to Grant much in his later years, after the Iraq invasion (’03-’04). I don’t recall what he thought of Bush’s fiasco in Baghdad. Would you have an idea of what he thought of it? Thanks again.

  196. Anonymice says:
    @George Rockwell

    He brought joy to millions mired in ignorance, sustained by our brainwashing Zio Mainshit
    media. Those millions were perfect fodder for Limbaugh’s smooth talking bullshit. And the millions made Limbaugh the multimillionaire that he was before cancer threw him into a living hell he so richly deserved.

  197. @KenH

    Rush loved rural White folks so much that he bought a 24k square foot mansion in Palm Beach Florida. He embraced conservative values like living with a cat in a gated mansion near Democrats.

    ……Hello you’re on the air with a childless millionaire in Palm Beach Florida, the place where wealthy NY Democrats go to vacation….Now go ahead caller

    ….Rush my wife needs an operation that would be free in Canada

    Folks let me tell you that Public health care is a godless Communist ploy and we simply can’t afford it.

    Now let me tell you why we need tax cuts for the wealthy and more wars

    DERP. Con Inc is going downhill. Not enough room for two deeply dishonest ideologies.

    • LOL: Schuetze
  198. @anon

    The cigars ended up taking his life. I wonder how long he would’ve lived had he been a non-smoker?

    You do understand that cigars are not inhaled like cigarettes and that plenty of non smokers die of lung cancer, don’t you?

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  199. I am happy he is dead. I find it funny when Christians get cancer for some reason….only cancer, no other disease.
    Hey rush….any feedback on whether this heaven hell fairytale hogwash you wasted your life scribing to…really exists? Lmao. Haha Good riddance bald fuck.

    • Troll: GeneralRipper, 36 ulster
    • Replies: @Johnny Nada
    , @Getaclue
  200. You do understand that cigars are not inhaled like cigarettes and that plenty of non smokers die of lung cancer, don’t you?

    He smoked them indoors which meant he was inhaling the smoke indirectly.

    • Replies: @GeneralRipper
  201. @Casey Jones

    As I found out in Anglin’s most recent “homosexual Jew” article, everything he writes is drenched in sarcasm. This one was far more obvious considering the subject. The sarcastic descriptions of Greenwald, on the other hand, fit right in with statements made here regularly without a whit of jest.

  202. anonymous[251] • Disclaimer says:
    @John Johnson

    No, it is reality and most White even remotely connected to American show business understand or just … feel it.

    Pissing off Jews is a career killer.

    Look at all the hacks who somehow get thrown up there as great, new inspiring Conservative leaders like

    That Paki insulting Southern White Democrats from the 1950s – Dinesh something, why are we supposed to think he’s a great Conservative leader.

    Or how about that Indian woman somehow made governor of South Carolina where should took down the Confederate monuments – next she’s made US United Nations Ambassador where she seems to represent the Israeli Likud party.

    Or how about George Will – why has he been presented as some deep thinker Conservative intellectual this last 35 years – he always seems to really go for all those pointless neo Conservatives Zionist Jew wars and he can be counted on to slander any White American Conservative who dares to suggest, maybe we should use our military to defend our borders.

    Paul Finley’s “The Dare Speak Out”….

    It takes a real drunk Mel Gibson to say the obvious…..

    It’s the Js stupid.

    • Thanks: Trinity
  203. @John Johnson

    Not necessarily, since most wealthy people who smoke cigars indoors have plenty of specialized exhaust for obvious reasons.

    Pipe and cigar smokers, as well as dippers are much more likely to get mouth or throat cancers.

    Maybe it did bring on his lung cancer, but weirdo Leftoids who freak about tobacco while advocating weed and every other blessed thing, just crack me up.

    • Replies: @John Johnson
  204. “Arabs were going to ride camels across the Atlantic Ocean and force us all to live under Sharia Law, which by his telling, was basically the exact same thing as communism – somehow.”

    Why, that’s what everybody on here believes. Geniuses that they are.

  205. @RJ Macready

    “I am happy he is dead. I find it funny when Christians get cancer for some reason”

    Every part of Rush was a whole. Every little piece was an individual animal, with a built-in desire to protect its own life.

    He is…alive.

  206. MarkinLA says:
    @Dumbo

    WMD was conveniently modified to include chemical weapons, which Iraq once had but were disposed of after the first Iraq war. Now it was claimed the Iraqis were secretly making more of them or had hidden them from the people in charge of their destruction.

  207. @dorothy111

    nah,
    it’s the shyte you post,
    no one can be arsed replying…

  208. @anonymous

    Exactly. Excellent post.

    Thank you.

  209. nsa says:

    The pioneer of cuckservative talk radio and television was the ascerbic rascal, Joe Pyne. In the 1950s and 1960s he relentlessly skewered assorted lefties, beats, hippies, liberals, vegetarians, etc . And like Limberg, Pyne promoted all the mindless bloody overseas adventures of his day. YouTube still offers videos of Joe in action. On air, he would chain smoke, sometimes having two heaters going at once. He died of lung cancer in 1970 at age 46…….just another failed human being crushed under the Kozmic Karma Wheel.

  210. lavoisier says: • Website
    @Pop Warner

    The only people worth listening to are the ones who are unafraid of the truth, no matter the consequences

    And these are the people you cannot listen to, because they have been silenced.

  211. MarkinLA says:
    @Random Anon

    Unlike most Conservatives he never really cucked on core issues like crime, immigration or social liberalism.

    I am not so sure about the immigration part. I didn’t listen to him regularly but did when I drove every morning to fix up a house I bought in another neighborhood. This happened to coincide with the push to get the “Gang of Eight” bill through. The only thing he ever said about immigration (that I heard) was his lame brained idea where we give the illegals amnesty but they can’t vote for 25 years. He never explained why this nonsense was sound. It probably had to do with the idiotic “Hispanics are natural conservatives” garbage.

    He never talked about the Gang of Eight bill on the show. He was getting his EIB network off the ground after leaving his initial carrier after all those years. One of his main advertisers was a PAC telling you to call them or visit their website and get on the list demanding “comprehensive immigration reform” with a fancy sounding name making you think you were against amnesty. I could smell the scam so never contacted them but assumed it was Zuckerberg’s PAC which was trying to fool Americans into supporting the Gang of Eight bill.

    His attacks on Chelsea Clinton’s looks were pretty low class. Yes, she wasn’t pretty, but she was a kid.

    The most important thing he did was make the millions of Americans who aren’t buying he leftist crap they see realize that they aren’t alone. Maybe that’s all we could expect from him.

    • Replies: @John Johnson
    , @pecosbill
  212. JxyMAN says:

    He’s probably in the hereafter having “so much sex” with coed sluts on subsidized abortion pills.

  213. MrVoid says:
    @anonymous

    That was really well put.

  214. Despite his direct influence waning, he is a man who shaped an entire generation of conservative thought, for better and worse.

    Worse, much worse obviously

    But I have said before that as a child, I spent a lot of time with my grandmother.

    She must be proud, and sorry she didn’t wop you over the head more often.

    He would talk about the New World Order conspiracy to build a global government, freemasonry, and communism being a Jewish conspiracy.

    He was an entertainer, a shock jock, and a grifter. He was there to misinform you. Just like you Mr. Anglin. Most “conservatives” are easily conned, love being lied to, a perfect target. The funny part is, the communists and Muslims were the real conservatives all along. Limbaugh was just a poser.

    promote those wars that George W. Bush did for the Jewish Lobby.

    Its a bit more complicated than that. Its more about global capitalism, hegemony, Russia, China, petrodollars, stock and bond portfolios of the oligarchs. There is never a single reason or single person or group of people or even country to blame. Sure, the Israeli lobby is a problem, but ask yourself how they became so powerful, how did they accumulate so much wealth, why is your govt. so easily corrupted? Who created “Israel” in the first place, and why? Who sustains it? I know its is much easier to just scream “da Jews”. But you should consider how it feels when blacks, Arabs, Hispanics, whoever, blame all white people for the actions of some white people. I don’t think Norman Finklestein or Kyle Kulinski desire to enslave you or send you to war. Israel and USA’s arch nemesis Iran and Hezbollah agree with this, I trust them.

    What he did was work a kind of voodoo on people, and transfer the fear of communism and the trauma of the 911 attacks into a paranoid fantasy that enveloped the minds of the average white working and middle class American.

    It works on people with no class consciousness and are clueless on how the world actually works. Everyone wants to know who is to blame for their troubles. Its the job of Limbaugh, Tucker Carlson, Anglin, Striker and just about every writer here, to blame the easy targets, the poor, the immigrant, Jews, scary Antifas, the Democrats, the Chinese boogeyman. They have to keep you chasing your tail so you don’t blame the ones who actually write the laws, have all the power and money. It works the same with the other side, they blame Putin, Republicans, conservatives, white supremacists, white privilege, scary neo-Nazis. In the end both sides are there to defend the system by scaring, angering, and misleading you.

    preaching a paranoid delusion that served the interests of an alien ruling class.

    You do the same thing, bruh.

    The human brain does not have a defense mechanism against radio. If a man is good enough at it, he can make people’s subconscious minds believe that his words are their own thoughts.

    Anyone can get suckered. No one is 100% correct about everything, and you really can’t trust anyone 100%. I try to put myself in other peoples shoes, not judge them, see the world from their perspective. Mr. Anglin should try not being so judgmental and reactionary all the time, it might improve his mental well being.

    I cannot even imagine the number of hours I must have absorbed of Rush Limbaugh when my brain was forming. I like the way my brain has formed.

    Yeah, I know. Its obvious. It explains a lot. I don’t think you do, you seem troubled, and confused. Like someone who lost his soul and has a lot of guilt on his mind.

    We all sin. But we must recognize it as sin, and not let the sin become who we are. When you sin, you must recognize it as sin, internalize the recognition of it as sin, and don’t ever let the sin overtake you. Don’t ever be defined by the sin.

    You seem to be doing the opposite Mr. Anglin. You double down on it. You seem to have forgotten The Golden Rule.

  215. @GeneralRipper

    Not necessarily, since most wealthy people who smoke cigars indoors have plenty of specialized exhaust for obvious reasons.

    Someone already wrote about how he will miss hanging out with him in smoke filled rooms.

    Maybe it did bring on his lung cancer, but weirdo Leftoids who freak about tobacco while advocating weed and every other blessed thing, just crack me up.

    The only weirdo is Rush who downplayed the risk of second hand smoke.

    Rush was just another man that was mad at the world and didn’t love anyone and especially not his own race.

    These bitter White “rugged individualists” with endless egos only line the walkways for the left. What better caricature of White greed and hypocrisy. There is hardly a better example of why the rich in this country should be taxed into oblivion. Rush made millions telling fibs to hard working Whites and then bought himself a mansion so he could smoke himself to death. This is conservatism?

    • Replies: @GeneralRipper
  216. From the parallel website of the daily stormer:

    https://infostormer.com/rush-limbaugh-is-dead-at-70/

    Back in the 2000s, I called into his show and managed to get on air for a brief period of time. This was when people were seriously starting to question the official story of the 9/11 attacks.

    I explained to him that I believed the 9/11 attacks were some type of inside job and that explosives had to have been inside the buildings to bring them down. Instead of engaging me in conversation, I was immediately taken off the air. He blamed the call screener “Snerdly” for allowing me on the show to speak to his millions of Dittoheads and suggested that I had issues from my childhood for daring to suggest that the official story of the 9/11 attacks was a lie. He also said that I should seek treatment for not believing the official Jewish propaganda about the 9/11 attacks.

    Plain and simple Rush limbaugh was evil in service to evil. Good riddance, one less liar.

    • Replies: @anonymous
  217. @MarkinLA

    His attacks on Chelsea Clinton’s looks were pretty low class. Yes, she wasn’t pretty, but she was a kid.

    This really showed who he was which is a bullying 12 year old in a fat man’s body.

    Then there were his comments about Michael J Fox. So low that I don’t want to link to them.

  218. I read somewhere today that the late Rush Limbaugh was the best example of white male privilege. He offended a lot of people, became rich and famous, got considered by many as conservative, republican politicians accepted him, Trump befriended him and invited him to the White House ……

    To tell you the truth I was shocked by that characterization !

  219. @anonymous

    Pissing off Jews is a career killer.

    Look at all the hacks who somehow get thrown up there as great, new inspiring Conservative leaders like

    So his race denial existed to protect his career? That’s amusing since he had far more money than all prominent racial researchers combined.

    Nothing was stopping him from telling the truth.

    Jews were not forcing him to kneel for the wealthy or lie about race.

    He was worth over 500 million dollars. He could sit in his mansion and say whatever he wanted.

    What you don’t get about these Con Inc types is that they hate you and I even more than the liberals.

    They throw in their weight behind globalist right and are extremely annoyed by anyone that disrupts the right/left paradigm. They want us to just nod and say yep Rush it must be the teacher’s unions holding back Black areas. They hate us. That is what you guys don’t get. They don’t think the plebs should be allowed to question the mouthpiece.

    Rush Limbaugh is not a product of the Jews. He is the result of the globalist right trying to make some race denial/bootstrap ‘Merica narrative come true by lying.

    The globalist right deceivers behind this movement never imagined the internet and just assumed they would be in a megaphone war with mainstream media where both sides see who can lie the loudest. These Con-Inc talk show hosts would last about 5 minutes here….tops.

  220. @John Johnson

    Take a breath, John. I’m not shilling for Rush, I just don’t get all worked up about tobacco use or second hand smoke. I own 45 pipes and shit tons of tobacco, if I die from it, so be it. Odds are we’re all gonna depart this rock in some less than pleasant way.

    I don’t hope or pray that Mr Limbaugh is burning in Hell, but neither do I have much regard for him. Never listened to him that much, and the few times I did he sounded pretty much like some NeoCon or National Review hack.

    • Replies: @John Johnson
  221. Dutch Boy says:

    Limbaugh’s nadir was the GW Bush years. His support for GWB was bad and his support for the Iraq War was worse. He made something of a comeback during the Trump administration, so his demise was well-timed. My impression was that he went with the Republican flow. When the Bushes had the support of the Republican rank and file (Limbaugh’s listener class), he was a Bush Republican. When Trump captured that demographic, Limbaugh supported Trump.

  222. central says:

    Regarding the brief mention of the NFL, they had special exempt status from taxation for over 70 years. All pro sports “leagues” are obviously big business and therefore fake.

    They even tip off the ignorant masses on a regular basis as a form of mockery. The problem is it is more than the average westerner could hope to understand. For many the indoctrination is too well established in their minds.

  223. gsjackson says:
    @obwandiyag

    I recall a similar statement from Limbaugh’s fellow (and similarly well compensated) house conservative George Will. Back around 2008 when the big Wall Street scam was bundling bad mortgages and selling them off to suckers such as pension funds, Will opined on the “crisis” and asked where was the scam, since lenders were disciplined by the marketplace whenever they had to eat non-performing mortgages. It’s hard to believe he didn’t know at the point when he wrote that the lenders got rid of this rotten paper like it was a batch of hot potatoes, and sent it immediately on its way toward the suckers.

    • Replies: @obwandiyag
  224. @GeneralRipper

    Take a breath, John. I’m not shilling for Rush, I just don’t get all worked up about tobacco use or second hand smoke. I own 45 pipes and shit tons of tobacco, if I die from it, so be it. Odds are we’re all gonna depart this rock in some less than pleasant way.

    I don’t hope or pray that Mr Limbaugh is burning in Hell, but neither do I have much regard for him.

    Cut down the tobacco use and don’t assume God is going to balance this world for us.

    The beginning of the end to our problems may start here and your contributions could be part of it.

    • Replies: @GeneralRipper
  225. @Trinity

    Donald McGuire SJ likewise in heaven–Mother Teresa’s Confesssor ?? There is going to be weeping and gnashing of teeth and this comment was fired at the Jews.—

  226. @TKK

    Despite being a Christian myself, I have to say I somewhat agree with you. There is a huge overlap between those groups and Zionists as well. There are exceptions though, and keep in mind that there are really awful people from almost all ideologies. That is human nature. It is possible to have a good ideology but be corrupt and bad, and it is also possible to subscribe to false ideology but be an empathetic, decent person.

  227. Tdstype2 says:

    Good riddance, and who cares.

  228. JxyBoi says:
    @BuelahMan

    I don’t fault Anglin for screwing Asian women at one point. When you’re raised with zero guidance or direction you are very much on your own. Expecting young people to make good choices is like expecting a dog to train itself. You can only really be responsible for what you understand. And when you’re raised by boomers you don’t really understand much by 18. So you got no choice but to latch on to the bullshit in the judaized ether of pop culture. You WILL fail because it’s designed to make you fail.

    It’s a culture that goes out of its way to make it very clear to 80% of young men that they are disposable ‘beta males’. When you are denied association and social intimacy with the opposite sex it’s only natural you go for the low hanging fruit of brown women. It’s not a preference for brown women as much as it is a preference for sex. What it really signifies is parental failure.

    Anglin did nothing wrong. He just banged some hos and that’s it. I can forgive him. He writes great and funny articles and is far ahead of the curve.

  229. Schuetze says:
    @Priss Factor

    Excellent and worthwhile comment, PF. Often I file your comments in the TL;DR bin, but this was worth the read. I do have a few issues though, one being that Limbaugh and Clinton and all the rest of them are hardly independent actors. They are all puppets on zionist strings.

  230. @idealogus

    I am an Orthodox Christian and we (the orthodox church) do not believe that. Not all Buddhists, Muslims, etc. are going automatically in hell and not all Christians automatically go to heaven.
    This is Protestant nonsense – Jewish heresy .

    The Bible says very clearly that our souls will receive new bodies, indestructible bodies that will have access to sensations of sight, hearing, etc.

    Where does it say in the Bible that simply believing in Christ is enough to send you to heaven regardless of your actions? Faith in Christ is very important but not enough. The Bible says very clearly that Satan also believes in God, Christ, heaven and Hell, and yet this does not automatically propel him to heaven.

    Lying, perverse, war-seekers, borderline atheist protestants who believe they will go to heaven just because they confess Christ will have a shock in the afterlife.

    Very interesting discussion ! Muslims believe that you go straight to hell if you do not believe in Islam, the only true religion in the face of Allah. If you are a Muslim you either go to hell or heaven depending on your deeds on earth. In other words you would only find good Muslims in heaven.

    From what I have understood the Orthodox believe that all good people irrespective of religion would go to heaven. I would like to explore more on Orthodoxy. Do you have any suggestions on reading materials.

    • Replies: @sayless
    , @idealogus
  231. @stevennonemaker88

    Out of God’s mouth into your ear, huh? You didn’t provide any citations.

    “Who is he who says it, and it comes to pass, when the Lord doesn’t command it?” Lamentations 3:37 https://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org/Lamentations-3-37/

    “I form the light, and create darkness: I make peace, and create evil: I the Lord do all these things.” Isaiah 45:7 https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Isaiah%2045%3A7&version=KJV

    You can’t handle the truth. So you’ve found your own gods. smooth words they’ll give you, too

    • Replies: @stevennonemaker88
  232. @Dumbo

    “The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked: who can know it?” Jeremiah 17:9 https://biblehub.com/kjv/jeremiah/17-9.htm

    Even the New England Journal of Medicine now admits the heart contains cellular/neural memory which they cannot explain.

    All men betray. All are fatally flawed. You do have a choice, bought and paid for in blood.

  233. anonymous[400] • Disclaimer says:

    All this outpouring of hatred for Rush seems unwarranted. He was good at what he set out to do which was to be a conventionally conservative polemicist. He took the news of the day and spun it his way. That’s it. He was never going to be what many people who come to this website wanted him to be. He was conservatism/Repub party Inc and nothing more. He bashed the left so that was a positive thing but that is about all one can expect in American public life.

    • Replies: @John Johnson
  234. I consider myself an “enlightened” conservative. I neither swing too far to the right or left but believe in the truth of Aristotle’s middle way as a guide in life on most issues. Now, this emphatically does not mean that a middle way exists in extreme circumstances, for example, your home or country is on fire. There’s no choice in these circumstances for much debate, you must do or die.

    Therefore, I have always thought of Rush Limbaugh as the typical entertainer, “blowhard”. He had all of the traits–fast talking, opportunistic rhetoric, not too serious about truly serious issues involving things outside of his own comfort,etc. He was somewhat like the guy who subscribes to P.T. Barnam’s, “Every”CROWD” has a silver lining philosophy. He was a good showman, one of the best.

  235. pecosbill says:
    @MarkinLA

    The only thing he ever said about immigration (that I heard) was his lame brained idea where we give the illegals amnesty but they can’t vote for 25 years. He never explained why this nonsense was sound.

    That remark was meant to highlight Dems real reason for amnesty of illegal residents. If ‘new citizens’ can’t vote for twenty five years, the dems would lose interest in open immigration. Of course Rush wasn’t serious, just making a point.

    • Replies: @MarkinLA
  236. @Irish Savant

    And even if you buy into the pretext of invading Iraq to eliminate the possibility of WMD, that can’t justify the nearly 20 years of the occupation that’s followed with no end in sight, unless the end game is, as it’s been for all conquering people and empires. And we know how those end games all end. Sooner or later, Pax Romana becomes soft and decadent at home, the borders become porous, and eventually someone with the capacity to hit back does.

  237. BuelahMan says:
    @JxyBoi

    Its the glaring hypocrisy.

    I don’t find much he writes funny due to the hypocrisy I watched for years.

  238. BuelahMan says:
    @Rahan

    If a theoretical guy throws all his public energy into maintaining a traditional white society, but in his private time blows negroes in parks, does this make him a hypocrite?

    Yes. But don’t let your own desires predicate your stupid analogies. Lets here more about the yellow master race.

    • Replies: @Rahan
  239. Rush mocked and enraged shitlibs his entire career. Set many yoots on the red-pill path.

    It was enough.

  240. FoSquare says:
    @saggy

    Here is a comment of mine from December regarding the ideational advertising war that’s being waged against the White population, with the specific purpose of undermining and destroying the genetic foundation of White Civilization. This can be construed as a form of ethnic genocide.

    https://www.unz.com/article/the-war-on-christmas-updated/#comment-4364168

    In your Orwellian video clip, the witless Biden serves his (((masters))) well as a heavily-compromised lackey, and a barely functioning one at that. His controllers flash a message in front of his glazed eyes and he mindlessly regurgitates it, before returning to the basement to undergo more gaslighting on whatever is left of his parasitized mind.

  241. @Jud Jackson

    I like Tucker but I was disappointed to see Tucker and Mark Steyn gushing over Rush last night.

    The only way conservatives are allowed any air time at all is by agreeing to talk out both sides of their mouth. Tucker and Pat Buchanan are both good examples.

    • Agree: GeneralRipper
  242. I’m just here to read the hilarious comments from butthurt Anglin-haters.

  243. @John Johnson

    I smoke maybe three or four times a week, and I certainly don’t assume God is going to balance this world for us.

    The reason I have so much tobacco, is because retard busybodies in the government have been doing their best to shut down it’s production. I have enough stored away to last me six or seven years.

    Screw them.

    • Replies: @Truth
  244. Trinity says:
    @aleksander

    Nah I meant 3 score and ten and left out the 3. Typo obviously. In some of my comments I have pointed out that at this point in my life I am not 100% positive where I will end up and to be honest there have been numerous times in my life I wondered if there was even a God. I see evil prosper over good all the time, and wonder where is God? I mentioned Mother Teresa, at one point in her life, I guess she was depressed or at a low point in her life, even Mother Teresa questioned if God really existed. There have been times when I have questioned if the Holy Bible is just a Jewish con job, but then I think well certainly the New Testament doesn’t shine a great light on the Jew and the OT is full of the Jew always waging violence on other tribes and that rings true today. Of course I marvel at how many of those who call themselves Jews do not like look their Arab cousins from the same part of the world.

    I also question why Christians worship a people who don’t believe in their Lord and Savior. Admittedly, I hardly pick up a Bible, but I have been meaning to start, but even I know John 3:16 by heart and since MOST Jews don’t have a lot of respect for Jesus Christ, why on earth would a REAL Christian kiss the ass of Jews or people who call themselves Jews. Judeo-Christian values? LMAO at that one. Why is Judeo mentioned ahead of Christianity? lololol.

    • Replies: @Ray P
  245. @Rurik

    This is a great comment, and I have been thinking the same thing. Both political parties are terminally corrupt and rotten to the core. One just tries to hide it, while one tries to flaunt it.

    • Thanks: Rurik
  246. pecosbill says:

    When Rush died I felt like I lost a good friend. Every day at noon over many years he was always there with his monologues and callers both of which let me know I was not alone in my viewpoints. Rush always said he gave only one side of the issues because he was balance and he countered the MSM’s less than fair coverage. Rush was sometimes only flash who lacked depth. But his flask could slice and dice Demorats so effectively few crossed him. We recall the dust-up between Rush and Senator ‘Dingy’ Harry of Nevada. Dingy Harry Reid will always be remembered by that tag.

    Like all friends and indeed all humans Rush had many failings and blind spots. He ranted about big over-centralized, all too powerful federal governance, yet he was a great admirer of Lincoln, the one president responsible for destruction of state sovereignty and the last remaining check on a tyrannical centralized government.

    Rush referred to Gov Orval Faubus of Arkansas as a racist when Faubus opposed the dictatorial overreach of the Supreme Court mandate for integration of Central High. Ike backed the ruling by sending paratroopers with bayonets to force compliance with a dictate even Ike himself disagreed with. Rush missed the big picture: A dictatorial Supreme Court and a Federal Government using regular army to enforce civilian law.

    Rush also called Gov Wallace a racist without looking at the circumstances of the time. The real issue Wallace opposed was, again, the overreach of federal judges who made laws without benefit of legislative processes. Rush passed the Wallace efforts off as simply racist. Yet Rush many times complained about the courts being a super legislature for laws the dems and their repub helpers could not get through Congress. Gay ‘marriage’ is now legal via court fiat. Every state who voted on this issue turned it down, but the supreme court saved the day. Rush too often reacted to symptoms and not the deep flaws in the federal system.

    Rush, like most court jester/historians, was a big admirer of the great WWII. He openly said that firebombing German cities and civilian populations was within the rules and needed to break the will of the people to resist. Rush made several tours of Normandy to admire what America did to smite evil from the world. He never stopped to think, was the war really necessary for the US to engage in? Was the war that much of a necessity to draft young Americans to ‘storm’ the beaches of Normandy?

    As far as the first gulf war, I remember Rush being somewhat unsure of Bush I’s objectives. The best he could come up with was, ‘oil at world market prices’. Rather lame. I was against the first gulf war because I didn’t believe the US Military was capable of making quick work of it. I was wrong but the first intervention led to many other follow-on downside problems. Rush felt obligated to defend the Bushites, his friends.

    What turned me off in particular was the US Military’s annihilation of the Iraqi army as it was fleeing home. Rush I don’t recall making any comments on this ‘overkill’. I guess if one is okay with firebombing Dresden, the Highway of Death is fine too. Really bothersome is US pilots continued to take orders and join the fun on the highway. Not one stood up to clearly illegal orders to commit war-crimes. I’ve read where the attack on the USS Liberty halted because one Israeli pilot refused to go back for another run because to him the Liberty was clearly a US ship. One Jew, if true, had courage. The same situation holds for the US Army troops guarding the demented pretender in chief. These personnel, federal agencies vetted for loyalty, an indignity not one commander complained about or resigned his commission.

    Overall, did Rush make a difference. On balance yes. He shook the hapless loser RepubliCONs awake enough to take back the House and Senate for the first time since FDR, with only a slight interlude for a few years. Mostly the Republicans conceded victory to the Dems and were contented with table scraps. The Dems were gracious enough to let them name a post office here and there. Rush was instrumental in breaking that cabal.

    But in spite of Rush’s help in electing Republicans, in the Congress, Senate, to the Presidency, no lasting change occurred. When Rush was on his rise nationally, the Dems held the House and Senate and Bush I was president. Now, the House is held by a wicked witch Dem, the Senate by the second dumbest man to serve and his side kick sellout Mitch. Meanwhile, we have a demented pedo criminal as president.

    The Rush phenomenon gave Americans a chance, but Rush refused to hit those issues desperately needing attention: black on White crime, black crime, abolition of the FBI and ATF and reform of other law enforcement agencies, and of course hard action on illegal and H1-b immigration.

    I do give Rush credit for many positive things he spoke on, such as his bad mouthing the $PLC, especially Mark Potok.

    One of Rush’s big blind spots was his ‘egalitarianism’. To borrow from ‘Full Metal Jacket’, Rush believed that “inside every Negro, there’s a white conservative trying to get out”.

    In the end, the world moved on and left Rush stuck in the 1990’s. Votes now don’t matter and the elites are openly criminals and unaccountable daring the rubes to vote them out, because they can’t, the game is fixed.

    • Replies: @Achmed E. Newman
  247. anonymous[251] • Disclaimer says:
    @Yukon Jack

    I m afraid I have to agree on Rush L on your call in – weird impossible J conspiracy theory on 9/11/01 is a real deal killer for most sane Americans.

    If you want to focus on the JQ, just get the obvious facts of J leadership to flood our country with the worst Arabs, Muslim extremists, MS13 cartel killers. Pretty much all J Congressmen, US Senators had have F immigration grades from Numbers USA.

    Js were expelled from Spain in 1492 or put under the Spanish Catholic Inquisition to covert if they stayed. The main reason was Js were charged with taking the Arab Muslim Moor side against local Christian Whites – being the Muslim tax collectors, selling White girls in to sexual slavery to Muslim buyers.

    It seemed impossible at times but Js and Arabs/Muslims were/are on the same side in politics in the USA, UK, Western Europe:

    They are on the anti White side.

    Israel and Saudi Arabia are now on the same side in all things that matter – supporting Neo Conservative Zionist/Saudi attacks on Syria and Iran, both Israel and Saudi Arabia refuse to take any Syrian war refugees, but Saudi Arabia and Israel, the Jewish diaspora demand Europe, USA, Australia must take virtually unlimited numbers of Syrian, Arab, Afghan migrants.

    This is the reality of the most terrible JQ, not some weird sh** regarding 9/11/01.

    • Replies: @Yukon Jack
  248. Truth says:
    @JxyBoi

    It’s not a preference for brown women as much as it is a preference for sex.

    Then how come half the Honkees on this site are married to Pie Faces?

    • LOL: John Johnson
    • Troll: GeneralRipper
    • Replies: @John Johnson
    , @Trinity
  249. Truth says:
    @BuelahMan

    Well, judging from his friends, hobbies, and living room…

    • Replies: @BuelahMan
  250. Truth says:
    @GeneralRipper

    The reason I have so much tobacco, is because retard busybodies in the government have been doing their best to shut down it’s production.

    Flipper, that’ll teach em’!!

  251. reminder says:
    @bayviking

    rush was an original Never Trumper

  252. @JxyBoi

    I mostly agree with you. However I would like to add that a man can find plenty of “brown women” who have not been completely spoiled rotten like almost all young white/ western women, and still heavily value the concept of having a non-feminized husband, children, and a legacy. This often requires going far afield though and actually living in a third world country (other than the US ).
    I’m married with 3 kids in the third world, and I much prefer it here.

  253. @Priss Factor

    “Alt Right could have introduced something new, but idiot Richard Spencer and his retardo crew decided to larp as Nazis and fall into the enemy’s trap, which made it even harder for Trump to try something different”

    You got that right.

    “Nazism 1.0 was essentially sound precisely because it combined rightism with leftism. National Socialism was about German Pride but also about the German worker, the backbone volk of the nation”

    Nazism 1.0 would have been alright except that Idiot Hitler decided to invade other countries. He mistakenly thought the Eastern Europeans were “Untermenchen”(underman, sub-man, subhuman). When they kicked his ass left and right and bitch slapped him back to hell did he learn his lesson well, only it was too late for the German people. Stay in your own country and try to improve it.
    America should have learned that lesson but here we were invading Iraq and destroying their infrastructure and killing their people because of some BS that Cheney and the NEOCONS foisted on the gullible American public. I remember well the TV spots where nuclear bombs exploded and drones were spraying poison on American cities. I’m an American but America sure has a lot of stupid people.

  254. @anonymous

    All this outpouring of hatred for Rush seems unwarranted. He was good at what he set out to do which was to be a conventionally conservative polemicist. He took the news of the day and spun it his way. That’s it.

    No that is not it. He indoctrinated millions into believing that race doesn’t exist and racial inequality is just caused by big government and unions.

    So he was reinforcing the underlying media message that racial inequality is entirely environmental in origin.

    This while convincing poor Whites that basic health care is unaffordable and tax cuts for the wealthy always increase revenue. That did not happen with the Bush tax cuts and yet he stuck to dishonest shilling for the wealthy.

    His childish take of conservatism is a complete waste of time as it avoid real solutions to difficult problems. GOP politicians can’t just show up to a debate on health care access and say something like folks public health care is a godless Communist plot designed to subsidize abortion.

  255. MarkinLA says:
    @pecosbill

    How do you know he wasn’t serious? When did Rush ever come out strongly on the immigration issue?

    As for the Democrats losing interest, only a moron could think that. The left plays the long game. If they have to wait 25 years to get total control of the government, they can wait. While they wait they will try to speed it up when they get the opportunity. You will never be able to repeal the law once it is on the books.

    So either Rush was a complete idiot on the issue or he was serious. Since there were so many other things he was an idiot on, maybe that’s all it was.

    • Replies: @pecosbill
  256. @The Soft Parade

    Genesis 1:1 In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth.

    God is THE creator, first and foremost.

    [MORE]

    You can take Bible verses out of context and make it say almost whatever you want. The Bible (and common sense) is clear that Man has a choice and that God neither pre-ordains nor knows everything in Advance. (God does have supernatural knowledge and power, but he does not micromanage everything) Because man is made in the image of God:

    Genesis 1:26 Then God said, “Let us make man in our image, after our likeness. And let them have dominion over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the heavens and over the livestock and over all the earth and over every creeping thing that creeps on the earth.”

    Genesis 2:16-17 16 And the Lord God commanded the man, saying, “You may surely eat of every tree of the garden, 17 but of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil you shall not eat, for in the day that you eat of it you shall surely die.”

    God commanded Adam, and Adam chose to not listen

    Genesis 2:19 Now out of the ground the Lord God had formed every beast of the field and every bird of the heavens and brought them to the man to see what he would call them. And whatever the man called every living creature, that was its name.

    God waited to SEE what Adam would call them. Just the way Eve SAW that the tree was good for food; Just the way God SAW that what he made was very good.

    Genesis 3:22-24 Then the Lord God said, “Behold, the man has become like one of us in knowing good and evil. Now, lest he reach out his hand and take also of the tree of life and eat, and live forever—” 23 therefore the Lord God sent him out from the garden of Eden to work the ground from which he was taken. 24 He drove out the man, and at the east of the garden of Eden he placed the cherubim and a flaming sword that turned every way to guard the way to the tree of life.

    God sent the man out and placed an Angel to guard the tree so that the man could not eat from the tree of life; man has a choice.

    Genesis 4:6-7 6 The Lord said to Cain, “Why are you angry, and why has your face fallen? 7 If you do well, will you not be accepted? And if you do not do well, sin is crouching at the door. Its desire is contrary to you, but you must rule over it.”

    “From God’s mouth, to my ears”

    There you have it. You are a spreading a false and idiotic heresy that places the blame for evil on God and makes him a sadistic puppet master, under the cloak of God sovereignty, which you do not understand. God is the creator, but men are distinct separate beings with knowledge of good and evil and choices. We are responsible for our actions, and always have been.

  257. @Truth

    Then how come half the Honkees on this site are married to Pie Faces?

    I actually have a White wife and I’ve been accused of being a Jew. I imagine someone typing away about the Jews and White women while his Asian wife brings him another bowl of ramen.

  258. Ray P says:
    @Trinity

    Why do atheists kiss the ass of jews? Perhaps it has something to do with power?

    • Replies: @Trinity
  259. Trinity says:
    @Truth

    Why are so many Black males on the DL? hehe. As a boxing fan, I am sure you are aware of Emile Griffith. hehe. A lot of Black male preachers, “reverends,” and the like have been exposed over the years as whoremongers or gay. The patron saint of multiCULT, the saintly MLK, is rumored to have swung both ways and there is substantial proof that he was a whoremonger. It has been noted that he even beat women. I have heard that the overwhelmingly Black city of Atlanta has even more gay bars than San FranSHITco. lololol.

    No Yellow Fever here at all, but IF I had to choose between an Asian female or a man, I am pretty damn sure I would go for Huong Chow Lee. Cue: Kung Fu Fighting by Carl/Karl Douglas and China Girl by David Bowie. Bowie is a good tie in seeing as how we are talking about gay dudes and/or dudes who like chicks of a different race. Hell, Cue: Harlem Shuffle and Brown Sugar by The Rolling Stones and Brother Louie by The Stories and/or Hot Chocolate while we are at it. We gotz commercial free radio here, troops.

    • Replies: @Truth
  260. @europeasant

    “they kicked his ass left and right” You are incorrect.

    Maybe you don’t realize it, but the Soviets alone outnumbered the Germans 3 to 1, and were also allied with the US, the British empire, etc for a total of some 10-1 odds or even greater against the Germans, in both men and material.

    The fact that the Germans cost the soviets 5 to one casualties for much of the war and literally fought most of the world is nothing short of amazing.

    Yes, they where eventually overwhelmed and crushed, but that is not the same thing as losing in a fair fight or being incompetent. The soviets where the incompetent ones; losing 5 to one casualties even against tiny Finland in the Winter War. The Germans where extremely impressive in the first world war as well, and lost once again due to sheer numbers.

  261. redflame says:
    @Not Raul

    I need some Xanax! *extends palm*

    Never could stand Limbaugh. These koshervative conservatives are more of a threat to than libshits can ever be since they are “wolves in sheeps clothing” whereas libshits are simply wolves and normal Whites will outright reject them.

    There is no hope of Whites in America ever understanding. They’ll be slaughtering each other again, in the South, led by “based” shlomos.

    Wish Nibiru was real or Nazi inner earth.

    • Agree: Not Raul
  262. @europeasant

    “Nazism 1.0 would have been alright except that Idiot Hitler decided to invade other countries. He mistakenly thought the Eastern Europeans were “Untermenchen”(underman, sub-man, subhuman). When they kicked his ass left and right and bitch slapped him back to hell did he learn his lesson well, only it was too late for the German people. Stay in your own country and try to improve it.”

    The Germans correctly predicted they would be attacked, blockaded and eventually starved out for creating sovereign currency without paying usury to the (((International Bankers))). They knew the odds were against them and fought bravely to preserve their people. They needed the farmland in the Ukraine which necessitated removing the Soviet Union. Unfortunately, the (((International Bankers))) prevailed and the world is on the verge of becoming a living nightmare. FDR, Churchill and Stalin were true monsters.

  263. Tom F. says:

    Whiny detractors criticizing Rush never address the most important question: “compared to who?”
    Rush always made clear that he had a job to entertain the largest audience possible, while being true to himself. He wanted ears-and-eyes tuned in as long as possible, and nobody could touch his numbers or revenue.

    Rush avoided three topics, and directly told the audience: God, Guns, and Abortion. Subjects like Race and Illegal Immigration are even less interesting or solvable, and a big turnoff to advertisers and listeners. And boring af, just try to listen to the vanity youtube podcasters with no advertisers and always have their hand out for “support.”

    Rush helped raise $47 million for Leukemia Research with his listeners, and his generosity is well-documented. He was a good and kind person, who stood alone while the Very Smart People took their potshots and his ‘friends’ stood by silently. 50+ years in broadcasting excellence, and he will be missed.

    • LOL: Trinity
  264. redflame says:
    @Johnny Smoggins

    They’d email the IDF for help in forming units to get er done on the enemies of their chozen people. Maybe Pierce would cause them such fear they’d get back to goin’ to church.

    Guess many here have already seen that Kentucky church that places the hexagram over their cross and tells the poor saps they’re shit compared to their lords the Jews. Contrary to many peoples reactions to this (oh my God! — WTF!) I’m not the least bit surprised and find the blatant honesty to their belief refreshing.

  265. @JxyBoi

    You’re mistaken; white women are the low hanging fruit.

    It is brown Asian women who are the most desired, and who the alpha males get.

    The losers among white men settle for white women – these men are typically earning less than $50,000 per year and have a substance abuse/suicide problem. Their pairings typically end in divorce quickly.

    https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13506285.2018.1475437 https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/p5191

    Marriages between White men and Asian women are over twice as frequent as those between White women and Asian men.

    Recent research has proposed that this imbalance may be explained by the finding that, on average, White men are perceived as more attractive than Asian men, and Asian women are perceived as more attractive than White women, possibly because Asian faces are perceived as more feminine than White faces.

    Here, we explore whether Asian faces are perceived as more feminine than White faces. Thirty-five Malaysian Chinese (20 male) and 30 Australian White (12 male) participants manipulated 100 face photographs (50 Asian; 50 White; half male) on a masculinity/femininity axis to optimize attractive appearance.

    As predicted, White women’s faces were increased more in femininity than Asian women’s faces, and White men’s faces were feminized more than Asian men’s faces to optimize attractiveness. These findings suggest that White faces are perceived as more masculine than Asian faces.

    White women look like beasts.

    • Troll: HeebHunter
  266. pecosbill says:
    @MarkinLA

    How do you know he wasn’t serious?

    Because I heard him when he said it on several occasions in full context. He was against amnesty and said so several times. You just hated Rush. Likely you never listened to him or a full program. If you disagreed with Rush and called him, you usually went to the head of the line. Did you call him to show how stupid he was and how smart you are? Since he was an idiot on so many things, you could have taken him down by your powerful insights. You missed your chance.

    Many of the comments on this forum, including mine have pointed out where Rush was wrong on key issues, but coherent on others.

    But to you, Rush was an idiot and you and only you have the answers. Nuff said.

    • Replies: @MarkinLA
  267. Trinity says:
    @Tom F.

    How many “potshots” do people just like Lush and Lush himself take at REAL WHITE CIVIL RIGHTS ACTIVISTS AND TRUTH SPEAKERS LIKE DAVID DUKE? As another poster already commented, Lush Limbaugh couldn’t wipe the dust off David Duke’s shoes and neither could pervert Shill O’LIElly. The $uper $habbos goys known as Pawn Vanity and Glenn Speck, nor could even the best of the worst, Tucker Carlson. Tucker is good compared to the rest of these wimps, but that isn’t saying a helluva lot. Lush liked to flaunt his wealth as well, NEVER A GOOD LOOK IMO. I am an ex-stogie smoker and haven’t smoked ” a stick” since 2014 and even my brand was almost 10 bucks a stick, one can only imagine how much Lush Limbaugh spent on cigars. Lush was a greedy, self absorbed, country club lard ass who played the game of golf, a sport that is enjoyed FOR THE MOST PART by self absorbed country club lard asses just like Lush. Of course for some odd reason a lot of ex-REAL athletes flock to this game and some are Black like Michael Jordan, Lawrence Taylor and even ole Joe Louis. The most boring and ridiculous “sport” in the world IMO. Think of the money wasted manicuring these huge pieces of land so men and women can hit a little ball into a hole. Even the Irish looking Mexican, Canelo Alvarez has taken up the sport. Seems like IF you make money it is ruled by God that you must buy a set of golf clubs.

    Hey people, did you notice how many “conservatives” came out of the woods as soon as Lush Limbaugh became popular and started making money? Before Lush, you could count the number of conservative talk show hosts on the radio and television with two or possibly one hand. Then, PRESTO, all sorts of “conservative” talk show hosts were popping up everywhere. You can bet these clowns will go left, right or dead center for the right amount of cash. Nothing but a job to these phony Israel Firster cuck boys, both on the left and right.

  268. Trinity says:
    @Ray P

    Good point and point taken. There was an incident not that long ago when an (((Antifa))) member started vandalizing a synagogue and one of ITS leaders told him or her that the building was a synagogue and not a Christian church. Reports say the vandal couldn’t apologize enough. Also it might be noted that many Jews are themselves atheists or at least they claim to be atheists. Who really knows the truth when you talk to proven liars who lie about everything.

  269. redflame says:
    @aleksander

    The individualistic, private Protestantism of the US…

    It’s not simply individualistic protestantism it is a combination of it and American civil religion. Reading about it reminded me of Rome. Which is kind of ironic since these people despise Rome of any kind. I go hard critiquing my southern brethren but it is only because I care but do understand that they really do not know any better. I’d defend them with my life only to have them turn around and put a bullet in my head for being critical of Jews. So unfortunate is all of it.

  270. @Alfred Muscaria

    Excellent comment. They were starved out after WW1… The British starvation blockade continued all the way until July 1919. You can learn alot about the future by looking at the past

  271. @AReply

    Just so you know. The disjointed writing style you worked so hard to cultivate screams of your low IQ.

  272. AKINDLE says:
    @bayviking

    Trump or Limbaugh? Both bloviating blowhards, add Micheal Savage to the mix. Pro-White they are not. Enriching their own bank accounts however, they are rather good at.

    • Agree: Trinity
  273. anonymous[426] • Disclaimer says:
    @Fr. John

    and, as it’s my job to know

    Lol! You, a pagan polytheist mangods-worshipper, who is also responsible for misguiding thousands into accursed paganism, knows what it takes to aspire to Heaven? You reject the Oneness of God, associate others with God, ascribe human-like characteristics to God, follow Idolatry, and you know what it takes to aspire to Heaven?!!

    Aren’t you one of those, when a wretchedly pathetic “believer” comes and pleads for an understanding of your clearly pagan creed, finally gives up with; You should simply take it on faith… my child.

    With due respect “father,” you don’t know shit!!

  274. @pecosbill

    Call me obsessive, as that’s what it is, but I’ve read through this whole thread. Yours is the best and most balanced take on the politics of Rush Limbaugh, with the personal stuff left out.

    Nice job, Pecos Bill!

  275. @JohnPlywood

    White women look like beasts.

    Yeah, like these two?

    If these women look like beasts, then I’m going to have to seriously reconsider beastiality.

    • Replies: @JohnPlywood
    , @Lee
  276. I agree Anglin. I haven’t been able to listen to Rush in many years because he became an obvious sell-out. He could not bring himself to attack the original Big Lie that has caused the Leftist social pathology that is destroying civilization: The lie that Negros are superior to Whites and that victimhood confers moral superiority and that Whites are the oppressor class.

    He flounced around the margins of the Big Lie, but he always kowtowed to the Leftist lies, fantasies and false assumptions that emanated from that original Big Lie; a lie that was invented by the (((Frankfort School))).

    Rush really did nothing to truly fight back or advocate for Whites. He was a member of the Cuck Team in the final analysis.

    His life and death are irrelevant to me.

    It is time to win some major victories for Whites or all is lost. The last great victory for Whites was the immigration restriction act in the 1920s. Since then it’s been one defeat after another by our (((worst enemies))). All we need is the will. Given that, victory for us is inevitable. But we have to snap out of our self-hatred, and become as incensed as we should be.

  277. AReply says:
    @Priss Factor

    Priss Factor uses 3000 words to claim the ridiculous idea that voices like Rush are pure reactions to brutal Democratic campaigns to slipstream the rising view in the age of Trump that the white conservatives are their victims.

    The Democrats being the party of oligarchic government and all that is centralized Orwellian evil -> Jews (omg this default Unz-forum refrain is so fucking tedious) trying to stomp on the little conservative while and steel his TV. It’s a sideline grift of the widely used conservative neo-fascist, inner-Goebbelsian, psychic gambit of projecting weakness onto the hated other, then demonizing the other for his cunning in exploiting that weakness, which seems here to arouse and attend the little white man’s sense of victimization in his cult of self.

    You can see the fascist freak flag flying when the boasts of superiority attend cries of victimization that the great race (whites stood on the moon!) are being overcome by the sheer masses of dirty animal others.

    This sense of victimhood is so prevalent in 2021 that son’s and daughters of the rich bemoan the how the chains of their wealth keep them down! So it’s zeitgeist. But today’s white “conservative” masses have embraced a culture of victimhood to such an extent they lament that jews and blacks have the unfair advantage of the Holocaust and chattel slavery!

    Only a white conservative man could run on the humiliating platform of “Make America Great Again” — win (!) — and after a full term of complete Party control of governance still be bloviating the the same insipid platform. Is a MAGA cap that’s got a “Made in China” tag ironic? Maybe not.

    It’s the GOP that serves tyrannical (fascist) business above all else, and wields its power in every way possible to protect its silos, which are wealthy private interests — “The men who own the country ought to govern it” — and to argue the point further is as absurd as arguing which side of a room has more air molecules. It’s tyranny that’s precisely what the moniker “Republican” stands for, by definition. You can give Republicans props for democratizing tyranny! The problem has always been who’s exploited? Who’s oppressed?

    According to this currently waning generation of American conservative white men, who as a group are notable for having more than they know what to do with, the one thing they have been lacking victimhood.

    So per forum comment, it’s the Republicans (business and only business) pulling on Democrats through populist dickweeds like Limbaugh who serve as the truest useful idiots, by squelching popular activism (which doesn’t imply nativism omfg) promoting infighting, to keep 80% of the people distracted, disorganized, and voting against their own interests.

    Intellectually, to give cover to the megaphones of ugly “conservative” news and opinion as “entertainment” and blaming those who believe what they hear that they should know better is the most self-serving, fatuous, possible gesture. But it somehow works! And we can readily see how it works: The writer who offers cover just decides to be beyond the reach of such “entertainment” and this imbues his readers with the same Grace, as evidenced by the comments here which all proclaim to be above it all (“Rush was a lotta fun, and I’m not-a-Republican”). The psychic key to this gambit of superiority is you have to disavow all news, because if what’s news is just entertainment, then there is no news, except what you choose to believe in. This is a very workable grift, as mega-church TV evangelists well know. The price of this gambit is crippling yourself into the ignorance of a vast sea of factoids (read anything written by Ron Unz). And a last resort is to cling to these factoids as informed doubt, while endlessly droning about your high IQ! Smart!

    We can see the Republican Hate Machine serves the very useful purpose of inhibiting people from asking simple questions about priorities in governance, taking personal responsibility, organizing, and looking out for their proper interests in a landscape which privileges title (as in deed, or legal claim of ownership) over any understanding or connection to what’s happening in communities. If you are a vampire of politics (and therefore finance) the last thing you want is your blood bags getting their minds back to any sense of self-determination.

    Here the GOP works both sides of the street at midnight: They hypocritically promote “conservative” values in order to harvest blood from a zombified base of bigoted imbeciles. Those not-a-Republican conservatives that can afford to hide in secure mansions or just have the legs strong escape to vacation in Mexico can identify as USA libertarians, a set which commonly includes retired engineers and bureaucrats of the corporate welfare state.

    Is the GOP’s political feeding off the desiccating corpus of Christ and the milking of the festering wounds of the Civil War worse than neo-liberal campaigns of extraction? They seem to go hand in hand. The Democrats have the fault of good-cops permissively letting anyone who is able to play the game in on some action, whereas the GOP, through characters like Rush, regressively liquify the brains of the populace and drink zombie blood through corporate straws.

    As the end-game is blood, it’s the Republicans who bend the better natures of Democrats, not the other way around. Then they play victim.

    Umberto Ecos 14 Traits of Fascism
    1. Cult of tradition.
    2. Fetishizing of modernity.
    3. Action for action’s sake — Do; don’t think.
    4. Disagreement with the prevailing culture is treason.
    5. Cultivation of fear of human difference; conflation of the human with the animal; fixation on hygiene.
    6. Broad emotional appeals to social frustration.
    7. Obsession with a plot; conspiracy or narrative.
    8. Contempt for the weak.
    9. Demonizing enemies for cunning exploitation of their weakness as strength.
    10. Vilification of pacifism for trafficking with the enemy.
    11. Indoctrination of the hero through the cult of death.
    12. Celebration of machismo and force.
    13. Selective populism; projecting the feelings of a narrow group as the Voice of the People.
    14. Newspeak; metonymous categories of exclusion.

    https://www.openculture.com/2016/11/umberto-eco-makes-a-list-of-the-14-common-features-of-fascism.html

    • Troll: HeebHunter, Schuetze
    • Replies: @HeebHunter
  278. Truth says:
    @Trinity

    The patron saint of multiCULT, the saintly MLK, is rumored to have swung both ways

    So were Kennedy, Reagan, and Big and Boy George.

    • Replies: @Trinity
  279. @AReply

    This retarded mofo doesnt even know what Fascism actually is. I doubt he has even read the actual Communist Manifesto too.

    • Replies: @Priss Factor
  280. @anonymous

    I m afraid I have to agree on Rush L on your call in – weird impossible J conspiracy theory on 9/11/01 is a real deal killer for most sane Americans.

    The fact that Israel did 911 is well established even in intellectual circles. Mountains of evidence to support the contention. Jews did 911 then more Jews covered it up in the media and courts. If the Amerikan Christian sheep have a problem with the political reality of Jewish subterfuge and control that is something a talk show host needs to address and be persuasive.

    Rush Limbaugh’s job is to reinforce the state and religious myths, I am sure he was recruited by the mockingbird CIA managed media.

    Rush Limbaugh sold his soul and told lies and covered up the truth, and I am glad he is dead and rotting in hell.

  281. @Achmed E. Newman

    Disgusting. Please keep these transsexual comedy horror clips to yourself, untermensch.

    • LOL: Achmed E. Newman
    • Replies: @Charles Martel France
  282. Trinity says:
    @Truth

    Hmm, which Kennedy? JFK and RFK were allegedly whoremongers and I believe that they were horny perverts with the morals of an alley cat, but “homersexual?” I wouldn’t be surprised or shocked, but I think those dudes were “skraight.” T Of the Kennedy clan I would think Teddy would swing both ways before John or Robert, just my opinion. The whole family was shady IMO. Reagan? Well, he was a (((Hollywood))) actor so that is highly possible. Big George or Boy George? hehe. Well Foreman had to go without women in training but nah, Foreman never struck me as being gay. However, they used to think Ali was a fairy when he was young because the guy was so dedicated to his craft that he showed no interest in women. Boy George? Dude everyone knows that guy is gay, but I actually liked a couple of his songs. teehee.

    Okay, I guess you are talking about Pappy Bush and Dubya. Gay or bisexual for the Bush clan? Nah, I don’t get that impression at all. Cue: Every Picture Tells A Story by Mod Rod Stewart where Hot Rod describes falling in love with a “slit-eyed lady.” I always thought Rod was saying “slant-eyed lady” but the lyrics say “slit.” Go figure.

    • Replies: @Truth
  283. @Jim Christian

    Well…Hitler, for one. Although it is not clear he had a dick. But he’s dead, I think, so he can’t say he would do otherwise…so, I guess you are right.

  284. MarkinLA says:
    @pecosbill

    All I know is he never said a damn thing about the Gang of Eight amnesty on his show when it was in the process of getting votes in the Congress. That said things loud and clear.

  285. Hopefully, Mr. Anglin, I will be around to write your obituary. I promise to be as charitable to you, whoever you are, as you have been to Rush Limbaugh – which is to say, not at all.

  286. MarkinLA says:
    @Tom F.

    So you admit that he was simply another P.T Barnum, taking the rubes for their money and not a conservative icon. That I can believe but why give him the Presidential Medal of Freedom? I know he didn’t ask for it but if you are going to give it to entertainers why not Eddie Van Halen? He sold more records and sold out more stadiums.

    Running away from race and immigration is why the GOP is in the sorry state that it is today, always apologizing for being white and giving in to every stupid idea that comes down the pipe. Just like Trump, Rush gave a lot of people hope that the GOP would start to fight back but he just went along.

  287. @Alfred Muscaria

    “They needed the farmland in the Ukraine which necessitated removing the Soviet Union”

    Okay that sounds good but why didn’t they(Hitler) just buy the Ukraine grain or maybe let’s see, I need food so I’ll attack the poor peasants and try to make them feel like shit. Yea Hitler that’s a good idea if eventually your ass will get kicked from here to Timbuktu!

    The real European people are now or will be soon be united to throw out the third world scum!

    • Replies: @John Johnson
  288. @Alfred Muscaria

    The Germans correctly predicted they would be attacked, blockaded and eventually starved out for creating sovereign currency without paying usury to the (((International Bankers))).

    How were the Germans correct? The British tried to buy them off to avoid war and the Soviets were happy to finance a war against the West.

    Dunderhead Hitler decided to fight everyone which left half of Europe under Soviet control.

    All had to do was stay in his borders *or* pick either an Eastern or Western front.

    He was never forced to create a false flag operation and then bomb innocent Poles.

    They knew the odds were against them and fought bravely to preserve their people.

    Fought bravely? That’s hilarious. The Nazis rounded up anti-Communist Poles and shot them in the head. Such valor. Hitler hated Communism so much that he killed Poles that had fought the Soviets. What a guy. Nothing says you hate the Soviets like bombing the children of Christian Poles. That’ll teach those immoral Jewish Bolsheviks lol.

    • Agree: europeasant
  289. Truth says:
    @Trinity

    Okay, I guess you are talking about Pappy Bush and Dubya. Gay or bisexual for the Bush clan? Nah, I don’t get that impression at all.

    Above a certain level of money, fame or acclaim, they’re all homos.

    [MORE]

  290. @europeasant

    Okay that sounds good but why didn’t they(Hitler) just buy the Ukraine grain or maybe let’s see, I need food so I’ll attack the poor peasants and try to make them feel like shit.

    Why buy the cow when you can steal it and blame the Jews?

    • Replies: @europeasant
  291. Lee says:
    @Achmed E. Newman

    “If these women look like beasts, then I’m going to have to seriously reconsider beastiality”.

    So I guess that it’s back to the barnyard for you, Achmed !!!! LOL

  292. @HeebHunter

    I’m the only true fascist.

    As for Eco’s list of fascist characteristics, it could apply to any group, not least Jews.

  293. @Tom F.

    Rush avoided three topics, and directly told the audience: God, Guns, and Abortion. Subjects like Race and Illegal Immigration are even less interesting or solvable, and a big turnoff to advertisers and listeners.

    LOL so he didn’t address the most pressing issues that are relevant to practically everything.

    Conservatism 4 Kidz and you are endorsing it.

    How can you claim to be a conservative political analyst in the US while avoiding race and immigration?

    It’s impossible to analyze US political issues and avoid race without lying.

    Folks let’s not talk about race and just pretend it doesn’t exist.

    Now let’s talk about education. The Democrats say they need more money to fix inequality in the schools but we know that the Black kids are held back by teacher’s unions.

    Rush Limbaugh lied for the establishment. Conservatism cannot be led by a college drop out that avoids any form of in-depth thinking.

    50+ years in broadcasting excellence

    He should have stuck to sports instead of cynically manipulating rural Whites so he could buy multiple mansions.

    What is the result of his conservative revolution? Why does he get a pat on the back? The Democrats have all 3 houses and trannies are now welcome in the military. All those millions spent on race denial and free market based theories really paid off. Like gay sex and dressing like a woman? JOIN THE MILITARY TODAY.

    • Replies: @The Real World
  294. Robertus says:
    @JohnPlywood

    I have replied to you about this topic before!

    The study above needs to be replicated and doesn’t take into account ethnic differences.
    It also conflates paedomorphy and femininity.

    https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/147470491301100410

    I’d like to see your reply to this study.

    Dating statistics are not a representative of worldwide trends. Not a single man in Asia would touch a tanned woman yet Latinas are ranked as the most desirable among Asian American males in ONE study which is a collection of data from a dating website.

    Asians live longer, have fewer aging related diseases, and higher IQs, the women do have one advantage and it’s having less shit mutational dna in their gene pool. If you walk down the street of China you will occasionally spot a landwhale or women with uneven facial features and poor teeth, the difference is how much of the population they comprise.

    But if white women have poor dna, this would reflect in the men, but of course white men are more popular than Asian men because the former has more sex appeal and masculine traits (note I make it clear Asian males are not feminine, but lack sexual dimorphism of either sort).

    But stereotypes exist for a reason, if there are fat lousy white females, there must be fat lousy white men since obesity is very heritable.

  295. Oh, please. He was a successful entertainer. I grew up listening to Rush a couple hours a day and Stern during the same period. I vaguely remember him having a TV show for a little while before the internet took off and that it was unwatchable.

    But Rush was also a junkie and a hypocrite to boot. Never trust a junkie.

    That his conservative groupies still can’t see this is mildly delusional.

    • Agree: Sean
  296. ccoffer says:

    I love how sanctimonious little assholes like this author have all the answers but nobody knows who they are. If only you were talented enough to garner any attention.

    Fuck you.

  297. @JohnPlywood

    I am sure that you are going to change your view about the beautiful Abba girls in particular Anni-Frid Lyngstad after reading this :

    [MORE]

    https://www.theguardian.com

    Torment of the Abba star with a Nazi father

    When Abba sang ‘Knowing Me, Knowing You’, there was one member of the cult Swedish pop group for whom it had a special meaning.

    The brunette Anni-Frid Lyngstad is one of thousands of people who grew up in Scandinavia shunned, persecuted and parentless. It is alleged that some were even used as guinea pigs in drugs trials.

    Known as the Tyskerbarnas or German children, they were the offspring of Norwegian mothers and German soldier fathers, the result of a Nazi plan to ‘enrich’ the Aryan gene pool.

    Now the group of up to 12,000, of whom many are now in their sixties, plans to fight for compensation in the European Court of Human Rights.

    Anni-Frid Lyngstad’s story is typical of the suffering of thousands. After her birth in November 1945 – the result of a liaison between her mother, Synni, and a German sergeant, Alfred Haase – the infant’s mother and grandmother were branded as traitors and ostracised in their village in northern Norway. They were forced to emigrate to Sweden, where Anni-Frid’s mother died of kidney failure before her daughter was two.

    The child found her father by chance three decades later. They met for an emotional reunion in her Swedish villa, instigated by Benny Anderson, an Abba founder and Anni-Frid’s then husband.

    Afterwards, the singer said of the meeting and her father: ‘It’s difficult… it would have been different if I’d been a teenager or a child. I can’t really connect to him and love him the way I would have if he’d been around when I grew up.’

    The depression she subsequently suffered was attributed by friends to the delayed encounter with her long-lost father, a retired pastry cook.

    The somewhat morose Anni-Frid, who withdrew for years in Greta Garbo style, is nevertheless viewed as something of a role model by her fellow Tyskerbarnas still living in Norway.

    ‘She’s achieved amazing things in Sweden, something she would never have been able to do had she stayed in Norway, where she would have been branded a freak,’ says Tor Brandacher, 63, spokesman for the organisation representing the children. Founded in 1999, the group, Krigsbarnforbundet Lebensborn, or Source of Life, takes its name from the scheme run by Heinrich Himmler, the leader of Hitler’s feared SS, to create a master race.

    It has been pursuing its claims for compensation for abuse and discrimination through the domestic courts. The case, involving 122 people, argues that the wartime Norwegian government – led by the notorious Quisling – was complicit in the Nazi scheme to breed with blonde, blue-eyed Norse women. The government asserts that if crimes were committed, they happened too long ago to be dealt with now.

    The case is now going to the country’s Supreme Court, but the victims and their families are preparing to take it to the European Court of Human Rights. ‘Having been rejected by Norway so far, we have little choice but to take our case further afield,’ says Brandacher.

    ‘We see Norway as a rundown gas station in comparison to the gleaming motorway service station that is the ECHR in Strasbourg,’ says a hopeful Brandacher, himself the son of an Austrian elite Gebirgsjäger soldier. He says the Norwegian government is likely to face huge embarrassment once the case receives full international attention.

    Most of the Lebensborn children who stayed in Norway are social misfits. Few have received proper education or been employed. ‘It’s typical that they’ve suffered from depression and low self-esteem,’ says their lawyer, Randi Hagen Spydevold.

    ‘Most have had problems forming relationships or being able to relate to the real world, which is hardly surprising when you’ve spent your formative years being called a German idiot, a no-good bastard who doesn’t deserve to be alive.’

    Had Germany won the war, they would almost certainly have been heroes. But Germany lost, and soon afterwards the Norwegian mothers lost their status, and their children were classified as ‘rats’ by government officials.

    The postwar hatred towards the offspring of German soldiers was so great that government psychologists commissioned to report on the children and their mothers concluded that women who had fraternised with Germans were ‘of limited talent and asocial psychopaths, some of them seriously backward’.

    The verdict ‘father was a German’ was indictment enough to send children to mental hospitals, where many were tortured and raped. They were deemed to be dangerous because of their ‘Nazi genes’ and capable of forming a fascist fifth column.

    Quisling’s government was desperate to be rid of the problem and attempted to send the Tyskerbarnas as far afield as Brazil and Australia. Sweden was praised for taking several hundred and thus relieving Norway of an embarrassing ‘problem’. Around 250 were sent ‘back’ to Germany.

    Many thousands of their mothers – labelled ‘German whores’ – were sent to Norwegian ‘concentration camps’, where they were virtually slave labourers.
    Of those children who ended up scattered around 128 Norwegian children’s homes, many were released from their virtual prisons as bewildered adults only in the early Sixties into a world of which they had little or no experience.

    When her case comes before the supreme court, Spydevold has as one of her witnesses a highly-experienced judge who will testify that a high percentage of the criminals he has seen have been the result of the Lebensborn experiment. ‘He will testify that through the Norwegian government’s neglect of them, many turned to crime,’ Spydevold told The Observer .

    But in many ways the most shocking aspect of the whole story is what happened to the children in the homes. In a separate case, Spydevold is attempting to bring the Norwegian government to task over documented evidence of drugs trials carried out on both children and mothers.

    Witnesses and documents say experiments with LSD, mescaline and other substances were initiated by the Norwegian military, Oslo University and the CIA.

    For Harriet von Nickel, born in March 1942, the road to justice is long but worthwhile. ‘As a two-year-old living with foster parents, I was chained up with the dog in the yard,’ she says in German Child, her best-selling autobiography.

    ‘As a six-year-old I was thrown in the river by a man from my village, who said he wanted to see if “the witch will drown or float”,’ she writes.

    At the age of nine or 10, she says, drunken villagers from Bursr, near Trondheim, branded her forehead with a swastika made of bent nails, and threatened to rape her. ‘A woman saved me, and I rubbed sandpaper on my skin to get rid of the swastika.’

    • Replies: @europeasant
  298. Despite his large platform, Limbaugh at best slowed down the coming dystopia. Everything in society got worse during the years he opined to the masses. Limbaugh’s ideas didn’t triumph in his time, at best he planted some seeds. I don’t blame him for not telling ALL the truth and getting booted off mainstream outlets – he did preach common sense and morality even if he didn’t always live by it. A more complimentary eulogy of him can be found at the Counter-Currents website.

  299. @Robertus

    The study doesn’t need to be replicated because it already replicated previous studies by Rhodes and Lynch.

    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3276508/

    https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/p5191

    The conclusion in both studies was that the Asian (and in Rhodes, Asian and half Asian) females were more typically female than White females.

    All of these studies take in to account ethnic differences hy using raters from various ethnicities. The results were all the same, so this is being consistently replicated, which is something very rare for social science.

    [MORE]

    It’s time to to stop the coping, the blatant lying and denial of reality, and just accept the fact that East Asian women are the most attractive. Inherently and permanently.

    Even top-tier white women themselves will privately admit that they feel “downscale” around Asian women.

    https://kjonnsforskning.no/en/2015/09/blond-sexy-and-immigrant

    According to Lundström there is much focus on whiteness in Singapore. Ads for skin whitening products are common, and whiteness is the ideal. But the ideal of beauty is not a white, blond western woman.

    “Western women were ranked below the Chinese in the racial hierarchy. The western whiteness is not as posh as the Singaporean, Chinese whiteness,” says Lundström.

    Swedish women in the US were very preoccupied with American men, whereas the Swedish women in Singapore were not the least interested in Asian men. They focused on their Swedish husbands. Asian women, on the other hand, represented a possible rival, since Swedish men found Asian women attractive.

    “The Swedish women in Singapore were almost desexualised. They felt less feminine,” says Lundström.

    You said “no man in Asia would touch a tanned woman”. But that’s not true; there is a scramble for tanned women all across Asia, particularly women from Thailand, Vietnam, Filipinas, and so on. In Japan, China and South Korea it could be quite easy for men to attract and marry white Russian women from the Russian far east. There is little discrimination among Russian women towards Asian men, and in the far east, Russian living standards are considerably lesser than in China, Japan or South Korea. Yet, marriages to Slavic Russian women are dwarfed by marriages to southeast Asian women, who are obviously “tanned” by comparison to Russians.

    To deny such overwhelming evidence strikes me as a profound weakness of character. Show me if you have one, but I don’t think you can provide a single study that provides evidence for a general preference for white women over Asian women. When you can’t do that, against so much evidence pointing in the opposite direction, it’s time to do the honorable thing, which is to agree with me.

    White men are not really significantly more attractive than Asian men; the rated differences of males are slighter than they are for females. Women aren’t going out of their way to get with white men; men are going out of their way to get with Asian women. See the difference in response rates between men and women on this chart.

    Women rate men lower in attractiveness than men do women, and are in general less interested in the opposite sex and pursue them with less intensity. Nobody’s clamoring to attract a guy for his physical features; it’s men who are the more visually oriented sex.

  300. This obit, aside from other issues, is factually incorrect. Rush never stopped doing political talk radio in the ’00s. The short-lived ESPN job was a side gig.

    Rush beat his gluttony. He was never as fat in recent years as he was in the early ’90s. And he beat his drug addiction (to painkillers, which he developed after being prescribed them for an injury). He went to rehab for a month, and came back clean and never relapsed.

    Rush even beat deafness. He got cochlear implants, but was still pretty deaf. He had someone type out callers’ questions and comments for him to read.

    And he was generous. Every year, he raised money for cancer research. He’d give away iPhones to his callers (even though Apple frowns on promotional giveaways of their products).

    • Agree: Lee, Becky21k
    • Replies: @AReply
  301. - says: • Website

    Anglin, Carlson, Steyn … are media commentators much the same way Stonetoss and Hedgewik (and Garrison) are graphical commentators. They are all throwing chunks of rare red meat to their audience. Of course they’re all meant to be taken with a grain of salt.

    But the ones I’ve listed, however flawed any one of them may be in terms of not reaching highbrow intellectual heights or in terms of not going Full Hitler (Anglin of course does), they’re all welcome sources of editorializing — needing only a few grains of salt — compared to the Jew-MSM we can’t escape from and which needs a whole dumptruck of road salt to be palatable.

    N.B.
    Make sure you have TOR and an onion address — http://dstormer6em3i4km.onion/ — to access the Daily Stormer. My ISP started blocking connection just 2 or 3 days ago, regardless of browser (save for TOR), to the normie site of dailystormer.su:
    ERR_SSL_INVALID (or something like that)

    I cleared all caches and unclicked DNS this and Safe-Browsing that; “Unsafe but I want to proceed anyway”; nothing worked. The error message came kept coming up under the header of my provider.

    ANGLIN WAS RIGHT:
    THEY WILL KEEP TURNING THE SCREWS TIGHTER & TIGHTER, MONTH BY MONTH.

    • Replies: @James Scott
  302. @Casey Jones

    good riddance colored people are better off you

  303. Becky21k says:

    A strange obituary followed by many strange comments.

    It’s as though the Rush you speak of died 15 years ago.

    He hasn’t been “fat” in at least that long.

    He admitted he ‘carried the water” for the Bush folks, apologized and said he would not do such a thing again.

    Like any human, the excesses that come with becoming wealthy became his demons; some he overcame, some he did not.

    And the expectations of some that he should have matched your views and said so on air, demonizing the Jew, etc. are absurd. He would have been removed from the air for such things.

    However without his actions and rise to popularity there would be no opposition media whatsoever and no voice for those who disagree with the globalists or deep state or what have you that want to control all our lives.

    At least be grateful for that.

    • Replies: @John Johnson
  304. @JohnPlywood

    You’re an idiot. What could possibly have induced me to read your comment?? White women are a thousand times better looking than Asians. There is no comparison. There are far more attractive Hispanic women than Asians, too (because the former often have significant amounts of white blood). Any global survey of men will rank the best looking white females at the top of the heap. Of course, there are good looking and ugly in all races (except maybe Australoids, all of whom seem really hideous).

    • Replies: @JohnPlywood
  305. Rahan says:
    @BuelahMan

    But don’t let your own desires predicate your stupid analogies. Lets here more about the yellow master race.

    The room for humorless wignat costume queens is two more doors down the corridor buddy.

    • Replies: @BuelahMan
  306. Robertus says:
    @JohnPlywood

    I will for now reply to the article referring to Swedish woman. It should best phrase it not so much that the light skinned Asian women is at the top of a hierarchy, rather they are the ONLY players in the game. Ethiopian, Uruguayan, Nigerian, Slovenian, Bruneian, x100 etc. are also excluded. The Swedish women aren’t being singled out.

    Singaporean society is one whose preferences are more likely to exclude non-Han, non-Korean, or non-Japanese females. Maybe a Shanghai or Tokyo company might use a non-Asian model to advertise a product, but SEA is very specific about what they want, and it’s that particular look.

    I have looked at those two links, but I don’t have access to the full article for the second, for now I won’t shit all over them, I can’t possibly dispute them unless I’ve seen the detail, but I would like to hear your critiques of the study I linked because it’s available.

    “Even top-tier white women themselves will privately admit that they feel “downscale” around Asian women.”

    Of course a landwhale will feel insecure around a healthy Asian woman, but what is top-tier?

    In reply to the first link, it again conflates neoteny with feminization.
    http://evoandproud.blogspot.com/2021/01/sex-differences-in-human-eye-morphology.html
    http://evoandproud.blogspot.com/2012/02/eye-of-beholder.html

    It doesn’t take into account the role of plain old ugliness. If a larger percentage of white women are uglier, it’s not because they are white, it’s because their dna sucks.

    Do you think Asians live longer, have higher IQs, and less obesity because of their lifestyle? Or from healthy genes?

  307. @John Johnson

    I simplified my explanation and I’m sure that Mr H had the policy of Lebensraum on his mind when he decided to invade, kill many people and destroy a major city ( Warsaw). I won’t even mention how many average Russian people and cities he was responsible for killing and destroying.

    My point is that if a group here in America identifies with NAZIS they will literally destroy their organization.

    • Agree: John Johnson
    • Troll: HeebHunter
    • Replies: @John Johnson
  308. @Charles Martel France

    Wow crazy story.I can’t even imagine what happened on the Eastern Front.

  309. @JohnPlywood

    White (especially Nordic) women can attain the absolute pinnacle of female beauty.

    See for example this specimen:

    https://hips.hearstapps.com/ghk.h-cdn.co/assets/17/09/diana-1983.jpg?crop=1.0xw:1xh;center,top&resize=480:*

    But you go for this?

    You are either a Jew or a non-White, with a burning jealousy of the allround superiority of the White race, or you are a pathetic self-hating White. In all three cases you deserve our pity (or maybe not).

  310. @europeasant

    There are Hitler defenders here that try to depict him as victim of British globalism while ignoring that he planned on leveling Poland and turning it into farmland.

    The Nazis were writing up lists of Poles to execute well before they were negotiating with the British.

    This narrative of Hitler not being such a bad guy is not only extremely toxic but falls apart to critical thinking.

    • LOL: Trinity, HeebHunter
  311. @JohnPlywood

    White men are not really significantly more attractive than Asian men; the rated differences of males are slighter than they are for females.

    Why do we rarely see White women with Asian men?

    Women aren’t going out of their way to get with white men; men are going out of their way to get with Asian women.

    This is ridiculous.

    The unspoken phenomenon is that small White men prefer Asian women to average White women.

    That is what underlies your skewed stats.

    Too many White women are obese and this distorts the dating market. Average to voluptuous women have a lot more demand than they should. Not that White men are holding up their end either. So a lot of smaller and introverted White guys just go Asian. The real problem is that society is a giant mess thanks to deluded leftists and statistics on how various subgroups groups date should be irrelevant to that point. Commenting on anyone’s past or present dating is even worse.

    • Replies: @JohnPlywood
  312. @Becky21k

    And the expectations of some that he should have matched your views and said so on air, demonizing the Jew, etc. are absurd. He would have been removed from the air for such things.

    I have said nothing about Jews. I realize the Jew haters here are very vocal but most of us are probably closer to Unz and would really just like reality based solutions to our problems instead of liberal or conservative wishful thinking.

    Rush sold a fraudulent form of conservatism.

    He pretended to be analyzing problems while completely ignoring key components and failed solutions.

    I gave charter schools as an example. He spent years blaming the teacher’s unions while not mentioning that charter schools were already tried in Chicago. Are we really supposed to believe that he wasn’t aware of that?

    His brand of conservatism is just the inverse of CNN. It only works if you lock out critical thinkers.

    We have seen numerous conservatives try to adopt his stance and just fall apart in a debate. For a complicated issue like education or health care you can’t just call people socialists or feminazis and then switch to the next caller.

    He was setting up conservatives to fail. This type of intellectual fraud will only favor liberalism. If we are to defeat the left then we need a strong framework.

  313. @John Johnson

    Again, you are making stuff up that is not based in any data.

    Read tbe Lynch paper. The most attractive white (and black) men are predicted to get with Asian women:

    It is physically small, underconfident, and lower income white men who settle for white women. In fact, this type of male is often attracted to white women, as they often have a weird fetish for a large and overbearing maternal figure. The big patriarchal guys from the upper classes get with Asian women. In fact, all wonen of color seem to be more appealing to men with higher income:

    Hence people like you (white women and the unfortunate white men who settled for them) have to come online and spread lies about white men with Asian women, in order to assuage your floundering egos.

    The science is very clear: Asian women are the next step in evolution and if you don’t meet higher standards, you’re never going to get with one. And if you don’t reproduce with one your offspring will be condemned to a future of drug addiction, poverty, infertility, malaise, and extinguishment. I’ll take that over your coping, any day. It’s what I see every time I drive down the road: happy, successful white male+Asian female couples and unsightly, white drug addict couples, who look like they have autoimmune diseases.

  314. Trinity says:

    Rush was old enough to serve in Vietnam, where was his patriotism then? haha.

    The only thing Rush accomplished was making himself filthy rich. I followed Rush for a year or two during the 1990s, probably from 1993-1994, before I decided he was nothing more than a huge windbag who was never going to doing anything but make himself rich. Around this same time period I was becoming aware of the JQ and I started noticing how Rush worshiped Jews and muh Israel just as much as Wolf Blitzer. LMAO. ALL MEDIA FIGURES AND POLITICIANS SPEAK WITH THE SAME FORKED TONGUE WHEN IT COMES TO ISRAEL AND JEWS. Go figure. Rush was no different than the gay guys over at CNN when it came to the JQ.

    • Replies: @Lee
  315. @Franklin Ryckaert

    White (especially Nordic) women can attain the absolute pinnacle of female beauty.

    See for example this specimen:

    I am not interested in specimens, but studies and experiments. The woman you posted is an ugly, craggy British hag with fake blond hair, basically the lowest common denominator in the West; not Nordic.

    She was notorious for her bad decisions in life and the shame sbe brought to her family. She died prematurely while under the influence of alcohol. Explain to me why you are pedestalizing this piece of white trash.

    But before that, show me a single experimental study, conducted within the last 30 years, demonstrating that white women (Nordic or not) look better than Asian women. I don’t believe you can do it. Are you able to show me a single high quality study that says Nordic women look better than Asian?

    You are either a Jew or a non-White, with a burning jealousy of the allround superiority of the White race, or you are a pathetic self-hating White.

    Why are you incapable of making more precise predictions? You basically just cast a net that would envelop the majority of humanity. Say things that actually matter and not the inner machinations of your severely defective mind.

    • Replies: @Franklin Ryckaert
  316. @Leon Haller

    But apparently no study conducted within the last 30 years would predict your opinion. They all say Asian women, and women with Asian ancestry — Latin Americans, half-Asians, etc, look best. How anyone would think Europe’s gigantic skeletor women look better, is curious. I’m inclined to say that you don’t actually believe that, snd that you’re only making these comments because you yourself are a white female, or in a relationship with one — therefore compelled to revive to your deflated ego.

    • Replies: @Trinity
  317. Truth says:
    @Robertus

    Not a single man in Asia would touch a tanned woman

    Not a single one? Are they all impotent?

    • Replies: @Robertus
  318. Trinity says:
    @JohnPlywood

    And what (((study))) would that be, Shlomo? I’m guessing all those (((people))) who choose 6′ 120lb models are just like (((you.))) Jewish and homosexual. hahaha.

    Rank on overall beauty.

    White women

    Hispanic women with a good deal of White blood
    Hispanic women with less White blood
    Hispanic women with a smidgen of Black blood

    all others far below including Asian women

  319. Truth says:

    Hey guys, from an outsider your Honkee Broads vs. Pieface Broads discussion, is entertaining. I think that there are beautiful women all over the world, but in any event The “famous broads” you keep posting, as I have said multiple times, are all trannies. All famous female singers are what they call “castrati” males castrated young and given copious amounts of feminine homrones, ergo; female voice and appearance combined with male lung capacity. Been going on forever.

    https://www.ranker.com/list/disturbing-castrati-facts/jen-jeffers

    As a castrato’s body grew, a lack of testosterone restricted his bone joints from hardening in the typical way. The limbs of a castrato often grew unusually long, making them seraphic in appearance. This anomaly, combined with intensive vocal training, gave them unrivaled lung power, breath capacity, and large chests. Singing through small, child-sized vocal cords, their voices were also extraordinarily flexible and quite different from the equivalent voice of an adult female.

    • Replies: @GeneralRipper
  320. AReply says:
    @Dave Pinsen

    “Rush was a very nice boy, he used to cut the grass…”

    https://youtube.com/watch?v=EVGDjC_cQas

    • Replies: @Stonehands
  321. @JohnPlywood

    If White men marrying Yellow women is “the next step in evolution”, as you frame it, you will have to explain why in East Asia (and beyond) millions of Yellow women are eagerly undergoing a cosmetic operation on their eyes to remove that racial trait which typifies them as mongolic, which is the epicantic fold. See example of before and after an operation here:

    Even without their slit eyes, mongolian women cannot match the beauty of White women. A flat face with broad cheekbones is objectively ugly.

    To teach you a lesson in racial esthetics, here is another picture of the woman you love to hate:

    https://hips.hearstapps.com/hmg-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/images/gettyimages-79732775-1555612781.jpg?crop=0.876xw:0.866xh;0.124xw,0.0134xh&resize=480:*

    • Replies: @John Johnson
    , @JohnPlywood
  322. @JohnPlywood

    You might possibly be insane. You linked to a poorly designed graph which isn’t proof of anything.

    The big patriarchal guys from the upper classes get with Asian women.

    Hilarious stuff. So if I visit a country club I am going to see large muscular upper class men with Asian women?

    Hence people like you (white women and the unfortunate white men who settled for them) have to come online and spread lies about white men with Asian women, in order to assuage your floundering egos.

    I always did fine with women and Asian women bored me. I’d go Hispanic well before Asian.

    No one is buying what you are selling. The idea that all White men are attracted to Asians and only settle for White women is ridiculous and goes against what anyone can observe in public. I obviously struck a nerve which means you are probably one of those small White men that doesn’t want to be the smaller of the couple. I am above average in stature but once dated someone larger than me and didn’t see what the big deal was. If anything the small guys with larger women show confidence.

    And if you don’t reproduce with one your offspring will be condemned to a future of drug addiction, poverty, infertility, malaise, and extinguishment. I’ll take that over your coping, any day. It’s what I see every time I drive down the road: happy, successful white male+Asian female

    Well I already reproduced with a White woman so I guess it is too late for them.

    Anyways mixed race children are more likely to have health problems. This is one of the unspoken taboos that anyone in medicine will confirm.
    https://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2003-11/uonc-som110303.php

    If you want to have half-Asian children then knock yourself out. They rarely look like either of the parents but I guess some people don’t mind.

  323. @Franklin Ryckaert

    These types of racial surgeries are yet another dark side of globalism.

    India has the skin lightening obsession. Skin lightening cream outsells Coca Cola. They will even have billboards basically saying that dark skin is ugly.

    The left will of course blame colonialism without mentioning that their class system already had negative connotations for dark skinned people.

    Turning the world into Brazil will only make this worse. Yet globalists actually think they they will improve the world by making it one giant market with NYC models plastered around every city.

  324. @Robertus

    But if white women have poor dna, this would reflect in the men, but of course white men are more popular than Asian men because the former has more sex appeal and masculine traits (note I make it clear Asian males are not feminine, but lack sexual dimorphism of either sort).

    But stereotypes exist for a reason, if there are fat lousy white females, there must be fat lousy white men since obesity is very heritable.

    Stereotypes exist for a reason but old videos of the US show everyone in shape.

    The problem is not DNA but our wretched society.

    Whites are fed a steady diet of self-loathing and confusion so comfort food becomes a drug.

    Conservatives call this the glorious free market at work and shrug as billions are spent on preventable surgeries.

    Liberals fail to see cultural degradation caused by White guilt and wouldn’t care anyways as they want to take average Whites down in an effort to equalize the races.

    There really is no organization looking out for White people. Even the churches have absorbed the self-loathing garbage. It all comes from the Big Lie of race not existing. Once you declare race to not exist there isn’t much choice for egalitarians but to blame Whites and encourage self-loathing. Priests and leftist professors both have to give “Woe be us Whites” type lectures less we start questioning why Blacks have such a hard time managing their own affairs.

  325. @Franklin Ryckaert

    JohnPlywood is a troll and an idiot, who makes no sense. That being said, your strawman argument of posting some old toothless lady or else a picture of a facial surgery advertisement are pretty off point and silly. There are beautiful women from all around the world, and lots of ugly ones too.

    A regular woman who has family values and has not been spoiled to death of any race is a much better choice than a feminized, spoiled rotten b!tch regardless of how pretty she may be.

  326. @stevennonemaker88

    That was not a “strawman”, it was a strawwoman. LOL.

  327. @Truth

    You’re THE most retarded down low nigger troll I’ve even encountered on the internet, Troof…lol

    Hey Troof!

    Check it out, yo!

    All dem photos from Neptune and Youranus, be fake as a muthafucka…Sheeeeit!

    The fact that total fucking nigger retards like you are employed by the US Government is definitive evidence that we are indeed living in the end times.

    • Replies: @Truth
  328. Lee says:
    @Trinity

    Trinity said:

    Rush was old enough to serve in Vietnam, where was his patriotism then? haha.

    Rush had a college deferment and then due to medical issues was reclassified “qualified for military service but available only in time of war or national emergency”

    IMO Rush served his country on the radio.

    • Replies: @AReply
  329. Truth says:
    @GeneralRipper

    You’re THE most retarded down low nigger troll I’ve even encountered on the internet, Troof…lol

    I take it that means you spend a lot of time on the internet looking for down low nigger trolls. Would you like to come clean about your fetish, Flipper?

    • Replies: @GeneralRipper
  330. RIP Rush says:

    Cliff Notes: Rush was redpilled on manosphere & HBD stuff, but (likely pretended to be) bluepilled on Jews

  331. @JohnPlywood

    Reality is very clear.

    White women #1 as far as beauty and intelligence.

    This of course includes the the Italian, Spanish and Greek.

    Then comes Hispanic, Asian and Arabic.

    Negro bringing up the rear,

    • Replies: @John Johnson
    , @Robertus
  332. @Truth

    You’re a funny stupid nigger, Troof.

    • Replies: @Truth
  333. Truth says:
    @GeneralRipper

    Bro. You spent your whole life in “Catholic School.”

    You talked about how beautiful English “people” were, then put up 12 pictures of English dudes.

    You’re constantly obsessed with down low Niggers.

    My friend, it’s not a big deal, the LGBT thing might even get you a better job nowadays.

    Just come out man, we’re all friends here.

  334. sayless says:
    @Charles Martel France

    What I started with: The Orthodox Church, by Timothy Ware. Decades ago a lot of converts started with this title because there wasn’t much available in English.

    It’s hard to know what would be most helpful without knowing you personally; I found most helpful books by St. Ignatius Brianchaninov; books translated from modern Greek by Esther Williams, especially The Mind of the Orthodox Church by Metropolitan Hierotheos. Books on prayer by Metropolitan Anthony Bloom.

    Some publishers:

    St. Herman of Alaska Press.
    Holy Trinity Monastery, Jordanville, New York.
    St. John of Kronstadt Press.

    Try going to a monastery for a few days or a week. Most of them have a website, although there are some who remain off the radar.

    Bon voyage.

    • Replies: @Charles Martel France
  335. AReply says:
    @Lee

    https://driftglass.blogspot.com/2021/02/your-bulwark-word-of-day-unvarnished.html

    //What we are seeing here is absolutely endemic among Never Trumpers. One might call it Dry Drunk Republicanism ™. They’ve quit the demon rum of the GOP, but they are absolutely incapable of quitting the vocabulary, resentments and deeply engrained mental habits that a professional lifetime spent inside the Hate Radio/Fox News terrarium has carved into their brains.//

  336. @GeneralRipper

    Then comes Hispanic, Asian and Arabic.

    Negro bringing up the rear,

    Plywood head is nuts but you guys are too harsh on Black women.

    Try spending time around dot Indian women.

    The arrogance of Indian women is unfathomable.

    They actually look down on Americans as uncouth.

    You see they come from an advanced civilized society where children beg in the streets and a hole in the floor is “good enough” for a toilet. Ladies you get a stick and a cup of water to clean your nether regions.

    They move to America for a better life and then talk to Americans like they are barbarians.

    • Replies: @Turk 152
  337. Robertus says:
    @Truth

    It’s called hyperbole.

    Korean men can be fairly masculine too so they have wider tastes (as a man should).

  338. Robertus says:
    @GeneralRipper

    It’s not that simple, white women aren’t no.1 any more than Asian women aren’t.

    My prediction is if you compare individual faces Han/Korean/Japanese women will score higher for lack of defects and better genetic health.

    If you compare composite faces (hypothetical perfect health), then eastern European women might score the highest.

  339. Was this the face that launch’d a thousand ships, And burnt the topless towers of Ilium?,/blockquote>

    • Replies: @Truth
    , @Robertus
  340. @John Johnson

    You make fair points.

    I can’t help but wonder to what degree Rush is responsible for sowing serious division between men and women. Within the conservative crowd anyway. The feminazi crap could be quite over-the-top — not that I ever listened to him but would see articles or a video online sometimes.

    The commenters on Zerohedge often crank-on negatively about women (mostly the old relics on there) while on Breitbart, it’s the young guys that whine and complain about women (and, sometimes, use the word: feminazi). The lot of the two groups sound like entitled bozos with 19th century mentalities.

    I think Rush built and encouraged some of that; whether intending to or not.

  341. Truth says:
    @GeneralRipper

    Dude, what are you doing? Those are BROADS!

  342. @Franklin Ryckaert

    Again, please provide citations for your beliefs. Multiple studies I showed you already demonstrated that Asian women’s faces look better than white women’s, using many different men as raters. Your refusal to acknowledge this science places you in the same category as a conspiracy theorist. If you don’t acknowledge the evidence, you’ve acknowledged that you’re wrong.

    Part of what made white women so much more attractive, according to the studies, was their more prominent cheekbones and wider faces, both feminine attributes.

    The most common facial surgery (face lift) is performed on white women to make them appear like Asian females — by lifting their upper faces higher and shifting their epicanthus vertically.

    Also, white women in the West spend more on tanning to make their skin brown, than do women in all of Asia to make their skin pale. Let that sink in.

    Not to mention depilation to remove all the hideous little blonde hairs from their bodies.

  343. Think again, monkey.

    Dey really dudes lookin’ like broads.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tropical_Fantasy#African-American_conspiracy_theory

    The Klan is fuckin’ wit you, jus like dat soft drink.

  344. @JohnPlywood

    Part of what made **white women** so much more attractive, according to the studies, was their more prominent cheekbones and wider faces, both feminine attributes.

    **** Should have read **Asian women**; but it’s pretty obvious what I meant to say here. The same thing apploes to white women, however. Attractive white women are more likely to have features similar to “Asian” women — wide faces, brown skin tone, a wider and flatter nose bridge, etc.

    https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn8251-hormone-levels-predict-attractiveness-of-women/

    Feminine beauty, the subject of philosophical and artistic musings for millennia, can be predicted by something as basic as hormones – in women, but not men. Researchers at the University of St Andrews in Fife, UK, have found that women’s facial attractiveness is directly related to their oestrogen levels.

    Miriam Law Smith and colleagues photographed 59 women, aged between 18 and 25, every week for six weeks. On each occasion, they provided a urine sample for hormone analysis and gave information on where they were in their menstrual cycle. None of the women wore make-up, nor were they taking the contraceptive pill.

    There was a very strong and direct correlation between the level of each woman’s oestrogen and how attractive, healthy and feminine they were found to be, showing that fertility is related to attractiveness,” Law Smith told New Scientist. The faces considered most healthy and feminine were also deemed the most attractive.

    “It is likely that those women with higher hormone levels also had increased levels of oestrogen during puberty – the time when the hormone has a crucial role in determining facial appearance,” she suggests.

    The amount of oestrogen produced by a person’s body during the average seven-year-long puberty is largely determined by heredity. The hormone has lasting effects on bone growth and tissue formation as well as the skin’s appearance, Law Smith explains.

    The left-hand composite faces was from women with the highest oestrogen levels, and was judged more attractive than the composite face on the right, from women with the lowest levels of oestrogen.

    • Replies: @Franklin Ryckaert
  345. @The Real World

    What is wrong with a “19th century mentality”? (I say this as an honest “racist” and “male chauvinist”).

    • Replies: @The Real World
  346. @JohnPlywood

    You adduce temporal fashions as “proof” of objective esthetic superiority. While it can be contested if objective esthetic standards really exist, fact is that the infatuation with Asian women in the West is a recent phenomenon, partly promoted by the media, and partly caused by the over-emancipation of White women, which made them lose their feminimity, which has not (yet) happened to Asian women. Thus White men chose Asian women by default.

    White people favor a tan, not because they want to be “colored”, but because a tan shows that they can afford a vacation in an exotic country and because a tan is associated with the beach culture and thus health.

  347. @sayless

    I have already checked the titles that you mentioned and their reviews. I am encouraged to get the books and read them. Thanks.

  348. Anne Lid says:
    @anon

    Looks more like he found traditional Christianity, not the fundie flavour you mention. Judgement and eternal separation of good and evil is an integral part of Christianity. Sure, the final judgement is in God’s hands, but a man is allowed to make a guess. Mature Christians may abstain from guessing the eternal fate of concrete persons, but also heed the words: whatever you sowed, you will reap. (It is also a basis for Western thinking: cause and effect.)

  349. @JohnPlywood

    The woman on the right is more “Aryan” looking and thus more beautiful. She also looks more intelligent. Being dependent on hormones for beauty is something for “the lesser breeds without the law”.

    • Replies: @Robertus
  350. Turk 152 says:
    @John Johnson

    My only question for Plywood is how many attractive white women has he been with. My sense is that he did not have a very high batting average, hence the graphical analysis of beauty disguised as scientific inquiry more commonly associated with late night discussions by 17 year old virgin males.

  351. Turk 152 says:

    Rush’s eulogy post on Unz digressing into an argument into hotness of Asian vs White women. The perfect way to end this war criminal cheerleader and Israeli shill. Apology for Iraq war crimes – not accepted, enjoy hell.

  352. BuelahMan says:
    @Truth

    I’m not sure how this is related to Anglin.

    But what really blows my mind is why these supposed white boys enjoy rap. Much less spout that ignorant shit. I simply do not see the attraction, except that it must be mass brainwashing of whites by the jewish owned rap “music” scene.

    • Replies: @Truth
  353. BuelahMan says:
    @Rahan

    My costume doesn’t include your desire to suck off blacks.

  354. SumoTChow says:

    There’s not a lot of depth or perspective in this snarky self righteous obit.

    Rush had a drug problem that he beat. Is that stint of failure in his life the whole definition of him? Really? 70 years alive and 5 years hooked on pain meds and now his entire life is defined as a pill head?

    And the fat accusation….are we to believe that because he ate too much and got fat (and lost all that fat on the QWLC plan BTW) his entire life is defined as unworthy? can you not focus on all the good he did because he got fat? You are probably a skinny little shit who never struggled with weight gain so to you all fat people are hopeless gluttons. Anecdotal Story Alert: My best friend on earth was a guy who did everything BIG including eating and drinking. He was also a cloths horse so he stayed in shape to “wear Armani”. Around age 50 He was broadsided by a drunk kid suffering, among other things, a severe traumatic brain injury. His life was radically altered-for the worse. One of the things that the brain injury did was disengage his “I’m full stop eating” response. He gained 130# in the next 10 years. Is this the definition of his life to you?

    Rush did not have legal and financial troubles causing him to sign off on the New World Order BS. We were neighbors in those days and he was rolling in cash. His show reached 18MM people when you allege he “lost his job at ESPN”. One has nothing to do with the other. He prospered at the EIB and was never off the air since 1988. IMO he didn’t sell out to “the Jews”.

    What Rush did IMO was worship the Republican Party as America’s Savior. He was overwhelmed with the Bush bullshit and all the perks of the Bush family’s charms. When he saw Republicans as The Washington Generals he switched Saviors. The new fake Jesus became”Conservatism” which is why he was a CruzBot until Trump either overwhelmed him or he realized that snarking about Trump daily Noon to 3 was going to cost him millions.

    Soon to die, Rush began surrendering his rebellious will and ego to Jesus Christ Himself. Rush professed Jesus as Lord . Was this another self preservation maneuver as before or was his conversion genuine? Those among us who are indeed Sealed will know in Glory. Either Rush is home with the LORD now or never will be. We who are alive and remain cannot know. My hope is that his brother David who is a genuine Believer guided Rush to The Way The Truth and The Life. I want to believe this. I cannot prove it- neither can David. We can only weigh what evidence we have and draw conclusions based on known facts.

    Why must you use chintzy ad hominem attacks to make your point? Rush had flaws as any man does. All the good he did was not ruined by his flaws. He certainly left the world a better place by a life (mostly) well lived.

    • Agree: Becky21k
    • Replies: @Trinity
  355. Robertus says:
    @Franklin Ryckaert

    The woman on the right and the woman on the left both come from the same ethnic group.
    The woman on the left is more attractive, BUT THIS IS A WITHIN GROUP DIFFERENCE.

  356. Robertus says:
    @GeneralRipper

    What do you think of what I have said? Think of it this way: A feminine woman can be very ugly if she has bad teeth, greasy skin, and a disfigured face.

    East Asians so happen to have less shit dna in their gene pool.
    East Asians have an average higher IQ too but that does not mean you cannot find individual non-Asians cases who score higher.

    Comparing averaged out faces (the hypothetical genetically clean ideal).
    The non-Asian faces are more eye catching.

    • Replies: @Franklin Ryckaert
  357. schrub says:
    @Priss Factor

    Another classic by Priss.

    He and Andrew Anglin should get together and form a tag team writing duo. The results of such a confederation would be absolutely mind boggling.

    After all, Anglin is, at his best (and when bitterness has not over taken him) probably the single funniest and cleverest writer of right wing political satire around today (admittedly a very small group). That quality alone is probably the reason the ADL hates him more than virtually anyone (even Hitler is probably hated less) and has gone so far out of its way to doxx him. The ADL hates him so much simply because he is effective.

    Priss, is, even his severest critics will have to admit, one of the most original, right wing political thinkers writing today (admittedly another small group).

    Both have something in common, utter fearlessness.

    Just mix their two qualities together and what could you get? Maybe a new Voltaire (version 2021).

    How did I come to this conclusion? It wasn’t my idea. François-Marie Arouet’s ghost woke me up last night and told me so.

  358. MrVoid says:

    I barely ever paid any attention to Rush Limbaugh. I’m far too snobby to have ever wanted any association with bible-thumping, Zionist, war-mongering “dittoheads”. Am I completely misremembering but didn’t Limbaugh have some kind of dalliance with Judaism? I distinctly recall Rush referring to someone as his “rabbi”. I’ve entirely forgotten the context but it was after his drug arrest. (BTW I’m completely against prohibition so it’s not something I would have ever cared about but it’s not unimaginable to me that Rush was some kind of prohibitionist hypocrite, given who his followers were.)

    • Agree: The Real World
  359. idealogus says: • Website
    @Charles Martel France

    Sorry for the late reply.
    Unfortunately, I am Romanian and the Romanian sites are not useful to you and in English I do not know sites regarding the ortodox catechism. The Russians and the Greeks are the strongest in this regard.
    I dare to give you another kind of advice.
    You probably still have a pure soul because the Holy Spirit is pushing you on the path of faith and you probably do not find spiritual guidance in your entourage. From my point of view, the main difference between Orthodoxy and Protestantism is the following. Protestantism deals almost exclusively with the study of the Bible and they have gathered a lot of knowledge in this direction. But in 99% of cases, a lot of knowledge means a lot of pride and a lot of pride means moving away from God. Orthodoxy is not obsessed with accumulating academic knowledge (mostly useless) and memorizing verses. That is why you will often find Orthodox people who are quite ignorant of the Bible. But Orthodoxy has focused on a few essential knowledge and its APPLICATION IN PRACTICE, real life. My advice is to look for and read books but then try to put them into practice. The accumulation of theological knowledge without humility leads to distance from God.
    Look for an spiritually enlightened priest with a lot of experience. It will be hard to find. Ask for help and guidance. Do whatever he advises you. Pray, fasting, attend services and especially pray sincerely and directly to God. Ask his help like he is you father. Because he is.
    Probably like you I also have this intellectual thirst that urges me to read nonstop and not to put anything into practice but the essential thing is not to have Christian theological knowledge but to live like a true Christian. And behave as if you love everyone. Even if he is your enemy or somebody completely indifferent, think like this “if I truly loved him how I would react” and do so.
    Atention! To act in this loving way does not mean to be a sucker, to be manipulated, lied , stolen, not to defend yourself or not to set clear limits over which to break any relationship with the one who abuses you.
    Live your life like a christian and gathers Christian deeds and not Christian knowledge. Good deeds and good thoughts will take you to heaven and not knowledge. Knowledge has its very important role but the modern world has forgotten to live properly and it is cursed with accumulating huge amounts of knowledge that it uses for evil purposes.

    • Thanks: RadicalCenter
    • Replies: @Charles Martel France
  360. @Robertus

    Constructing “average” faces from multi-racial countries is misleading. Better would be to construct separate average faces from the various racial groups (and the mixed-race groups, if they are large enough and already stabilized).

  361. Trinity says:

    Raquel Welch, Ann-Margret, Sophia Loren, Angie Dickinson ( not really gorgeous but just sexy as hell), Pamela Anderson ( in her prime) etc., etc.

    What man, especially a White man, would take an Oriental, Hispanic, Arab, Jew, East Indian, American Indian, Pakistani or any other type of female over the women I listed? You would either have to be borderline homosexual or a complete dweeb to prefer any nonwhite woman over a gorgeous White female. And sorry, but Black females are the least attractive women on the planet. I ain’t hating, I am just stating facts just like you won’t ever see a White man win a gold medal in the 100 meters in the Olympics.

    • Replies: @Truth
  362. Trinity says:
    @SumoTChow

    Amazing, Rush found the Lord when he knew his clock was running out. So amazing that people wait until they are going to die or when they face prison or other bad times that they suddenly find the Lord. Never mind that they don’t have time for all that religious nonsense and God when times are good. lololol.

    Pretty sure that Rush will have to give an account for HIS ENTIRE LIFE not just the time when he became “religious.” GOD SEES AND KNOWS ALL. Rush’s money, and his golden EIB microphone won’t amount to shit when he stands before God Almighty.

    • Replies: @The Real World
  363. Truth says:
    @BuelahMan

    But what really blows my mind is why these supposed white boys enjoy rap.

    The thing that really blows my mind is… They actually weren’t half bad!

    But that’s just it, don’t let the media brainwashing tell you otherwise Bro. With the right mindset, the white man can achieve ANYTHING.

    • Replies: @BuelahMan
  364. Truth says:
    @Trinity

    Raquel Welch, Ann-Margret, Sophia Loren, Angie Dickinson ( not really gorgeous but just sexy as hell), Pamela Anderson ( in her prime) etc., etc.

    You would either have to be borderline homosexual

    LOL, Well U-T; life is complicated…

    • LOL: Trinity
    • Replies: @Trinity
  365. Of course troof supports Whites adopting the worst aspects of Black culture.

    Liberals are of the same mentality. Both Blacks and liberals clearly have no hope of Blacks adopting the best aspects of White culture. Liberals no longer even talk about helping Black men through jobs programs or training. All their focus is on blaming Whites and in fact it is taboo to even suggest that Black men can improve their situation through their own will.

    The best hope of the modern egalitarian is for everyone to adopt a mindless tribal outlook and just blame “the man” if their self-destructive neck tattoo lifestyle doesn’t work out.

    Sad really.

    • Agree: RadicalCenter
  366. anonymous[426] • Disclaimer says:
    @aleksander

    And the truth is Jesus Christ.

    Except, you came to know this “truth” (that Jesus PBUH is the “son of god”) through plain run-of-the-mill hearsay. Is it not?

    Your “truth” is just a repackaged form of other kinds of Paganism, such as Hindooism (google, Triple Deity and see the similarity between these two pagan faiths). Your “truth” has about as much logicality as a Hindoo’s “truth” of Vishnu, Shiva, etc. If Jesus PBUH is the “son of god,” and thus “god himself,” then why can’t Vishnu be “god” too? After all, both your ancestors claimed this perfidious nonsense.

    Just imagine, if all that hearsay happens to be a pack of lies, and it is indeed that and so much worse, then you are so totally screwed.

    It is like depending on Faux “News” sources for your salvation. You are not being very smart. 😀

  367. Trinity says:
    @Truth

    Matthew Boling is NOT WHITE.

    Dafne Schippers is ACTUALLY WHITE and not bad looking for a female athlete.

    • Replies: @Truth
  368. SumoTChow says:
    @The Real World

    “not that I ever listened to him” How then is your opinion valid?

    • Replies: @The Real World
  369. @Franklin Ryckaert

    Well. you may do as you like, of course. And reap the results, as we all do for our choices.

    Personally, I have long been a fan of what I call “being present in my own era”. I find it a more reasonable, rational and easier way to live.

    It’s not rational to expect that 19th century sensibilities would work well in the 21st century. And, yet, the bozos I mention don’t seem to ever compute that the issue is them, not the world. The universe is going to do what it will — so life is better and happier if one learns to adapt, within reason.

    (FYI, I do not support most of the modern-day, Dem-Libtard platform so I’m not suggesting adapting to that lunacy.)

  370. Truth says:
    @Trinity

    Matthew Boling is NOT WHITE.

    What is he, Bangladeshi?

    Dafne Schippers is ACTUALLY WHITE and not bad looking for a female athlete.

    Old Sport; one out of two isn’t bad…

  371. @SumoTChow

    Re-read and comprehend accurately….

  372. @Trinity

    GOD SEES AND KNOWS ALL.

    It is only narcissistic humans who thinks so.

  373. The basic point of the article is good, although you’re underrating the good Rush did to fight the direction of deterioration — but he didn’t mention Jewish Network effectively or at all (mostly), the 9-11 hoax, the evil of counterfeit Israel, or computer votefraud as the way they are controlling our society’s drift to the left. But you, Andrew, or David Duke, do not understand the fatal threat of computer votefraud, and my experience is that the self-touted “white champions” are mysteriously unwilling to learn about, even though it would take less than an hour. (See the emergency nine page memo on the home page of OpenLetterToDonaldTrump.com) The organized Jewish Shadow government can fix any election they want except in half of New Hampshire – and they are using this power meticulously gained since 1973 to conquer the USA, as almost all “leaders” are too damn stupid to realize that you don’t let your mortal enemies take your votes into the back room and count them in secret, and then tell you what the results are, when you have no checks and balances.

    The inaccuracies in the article are serious: Rush NEVER quit political talk to do sports. Rush did NOT mention the Jewish Lobby hardly at all — I would have said never but you apparently heard him mention it a few times, I’m sure favorably.

  374. Anon[161] • Disclaimer says:

    Rush Limbaugh was a Corporate Welfare Shill. He disguised all this as being some kind of a Populist. In fact, Rush Limbaugh was the radio mouthpiece of the Super Wealthy who were waging a War on the American Middle Class. I know this because at one time I was a True Blue brainwashed Republican. I listened to Rush all the time. Then I grew a brain. Rush Limbaugh was the Radio Talk Show host version of Ronald Reagan. They both sought to destroy the American Middle Class all the while claiming they just “wanted everybody to be the best they can be”. With Limbaugh Government was ALWAYS the problem. Limbaugh was a Con Artist who fooled his “dittohead” followers. To my shame, I admit to being one of them.

    • Agree: RedpilledAF
    • Thanks: Trinity
    • Replies: @Turk 152
    , @The Real World
  375. Turk 152 says:
    @Anon

    There is no shame in being brainwashed between 2002-2006 as the vast majority were too. After that it gets a little dicey, nowadays, it is just pathetic.

    • Replies: @Trinity
  376. Trinity says:
    @Turk 152

    Racial awareness should have been learned by the “normies” decades ago, even those backwoods Puritans in New England have no excuse for that “we all bleed red” bullshit, no matter how many Stephen King books they read.

    The JQ? It should have started to become recognizable at least in the 1990s and there is no excuse for being ignorant to the JQ from 2000 to present IMO unless you choose to be WILLFULLY ignorant or just too cowed by political correctness to address it, like Rush Limbaugh, Pawn Vanity, and even Tucker Carlson along with the gay guys at CNN. Even the most indoctrinated “normie” out there should be aware of the JQ in the year 2021, if he or she isn’t, they aren’t looking too hard or maybe they are too scared to look behind the curtain. Could be stupid pride, they don’t want to admit they have been suckers for a century and counting.

  377. Tonypoo says:

    In my opinion, Rush was a dirty Zionist. He was a supporter of the Military-Industrial Complex. He lied to simple-minded ignorant Americans and he made over 700 Million dollars.

    I generally do not wish death upon anyone and I generally do not drink alcohol. But I celebrated the death of these two devils with a glass of wine. John Mccain a terrorist war criminal and Ruch Limbaugh. I hope they are both rotting in hell for crimes against humanity.

  378. @Pindos

    I don’t remember most of the authors “facts”. Liar.

    LOL

    Or your memory is fucked.

    Cretin.

  379. Ima idiot says:

    I first listened to Rush in January 1992. He was then very much an anti-lib, and very much a Reaganite. I do not know about before then, but I wonder at Anglin’s recollection of things.
    Rush didn’t seem to change much in the 30 years, off and on, that I heard his program. That he had cooled a bit on fighting wars in the Middle East is explainable by the passing of time and changes in the world situation. Maybe he thought what good could be done by those adventures had been done. Or, maybe he saw that the GWOT had been a mistake, or at least needed a fresh look.
    So many of the commentariat here want to paint him in the worst light, when perhaps they could do with a little self- examination.

    • Replies: @Turk 152
    , @John Johnson
  380. @Anon

    I don’t have anything to support or dispute in your comment because I never paid attention to Limbaugh.

    But, not defining the below doesn’t help me understand what you alleged about his motives.

    Rush Limbaugh was the radio mouthpiece of the Super Wealthy who were waging a War on the American Middle Class.

    They both sought to destroy the American Middle Class

  381. @Rurik

    Thank you – as always – for speaking the absolute truth – as always.

    No more pictures like that one though, please. I really don’t think I can take that much of someone else’s pain.

    I hope, pray and believe with all my heart that ALL those who call themselves part of zio-Jewry will burn in a very real hellfire, for the remorseless satanic evil of what they have done to a once-sane world.

    • Thanks: Rurik
  382. Turk 152 says:
    @Ima idiot

    For those of us who don’t live in your echo chamber, can you line up a string of facts and logical assumptions that explain what we need to reflect upon besides pro-Reagan, anti – Dem about the good things that once occurred due to GWOT?

    • Replies: @Ima idiot
  383. @idealogus

    “. But in 99% of cases, a lot of knowledge means a lot of pride and a lot of pride means moving away from God. Orthodoxy is not obsessed with accumulating academic knowledge (mostly useless) and memorizing verses. That is why you will often find Orthodox people who are quite ignorant of the Bible. But Orthodoxy has focused on a few essential knowledge and its APPLICATION IN PRACTICE, real life. My advice is to look for and read books but then try to put them into practice. The accumulation of theological knowledge without humility leads to distance from God. ”

    That is exactly the impression that I had of the Orthodoxy ever since I visited a Russian Orthodox Church with my maternal grandmother long time ago. It is as if you have read my mind. I want to do some reading to give structure to ” the focus on a few essential knowledge and its application in practice, in real life. ” as you put it succinctly. I appreciate your advice and guidance. I am glad that there is some degree of Orthodox revival in places like Romania where the humble people suffered a lot under Communism.

  384. Ima idiot says:
    @Turk 152

    Whom am I echoing? And in what chamber? You know nothing about me.
    I was describing Rush’s consistency over the years, contra Anglin’s assertions otherwise, and not any particular view of my own on Rush’s cheerleading for republicans.
    Maybe that triggered some deep seated trauma in you. Sorry.
    By the way, The words I wrote are ‘self-reflection’. That usually would involve one’s own motives, feelings, and failings, and not really so much of the policy preferences of a now dead guy on the radio, even if he did save a.m. radio.

    • Replies: @Ima idiot
  385. Ima idiot says:
    @Ima idiot

    Meant ‘self-examination’ rather than ‘self-reflection’ in my reply to @Turk 152, but the meanings are similar enough to serve.

  386. Turk 152 says:

    I misunderstood your perspective. I should have known better than to question someone bold enough on this forum to call themselves ima idiot.

  387. @-

    dailystormer.name in googles search bar will find it and it loads in firefox or chrome.

  388. @AReply

    Great googly moogly! I was really enjoying the FZ link when goose-bumps crawled up my spine. Yup, I had in fact just awakened from sleep and I had been dreaming that I was cutting the grass, talk about synchronicity!?

  389. @Cowboy

    David Limbaugh—that David indeed is interesting. Could be this Limbaugh is tight with John Hagee and another ChristianZionist with Southern Baptist blsssings?

  390. Jay Fink says:

    I was against the Iraq war from months before it started. I remember 2003 very well and Rush Limbaugh did not stand out. Just about everyone in the media, across the political spectrum, was all for it. Michael Moore made a point of this in one of his movies. Every TV news anchor or talking head was cheerleading the war. As someone against it I felt very alone in this world. The only people I could find who were against it at the time were Justin from antiwar.com and a liberal radio talk host in Las Vegas named Doug Basham.

    I was against the war for a reason few would approve of. I value secularism and the rights of women to wear immodest western fashion above all else. I was a passionate supporter of Saddam Hussein because he was a secularist and did not force women to cover themselves. This is the same reason Syria’s Assad is perhaps my favorite leader in the world today.

    Even if I am Jewish I am not influenced to dislike a country just because Israel does. In fact it seems for whatever reason Israel (and sadly the U.S) always takes the side of the more fundamentalist Islamic governments over the secular ones. I am not sure if this is merely coincidence or if there is some strategy behind this.

    • Replies: @Ima idiot
    , @Turk 152
    , @Lee
  391. BuelahMan says:
    @Truth

    Half bad is about like voting for Trump because he is the lesser of two evils.

    Bad is bad. evil is evil.

    Calling rap “music” is the true evil.

  392. Ima idiot says:
    @Jay Fink

    I recall at the time of the Iraq war that Rush asked, in his manner of putting a question out there, why the US didn’t hit Iran first, and remove the leadership there, before Iraq.

    A lot of conservative talk-show hosts asked the same question post 9-11. How much of this was tough talk is a valid question, I think.

    • Replies: @Jay Fink
  393. Turk 152 says:
    @Jay Fink

    The US needs their boogeymen. What do you think our politicians would rather discuss, the bad brown man with the large mustache who is about to kill you or the state of education, national infrastructure, income inequality and imbalances of trade to China due to outsourcing?

  394. Lee says:
    @Jay Fink

    Jay said:

    Just about everyone in the media, across the political spectrum, was all for it. Michael Moore made a point of this in one of his movies. Every TV news anchor or talking head was cheerleading the war. As someone against it I felt very alone in this world. The only people I could find who were against it at the time were Justin from antiwar.com and a liberal radio talk host in Las Vegas named Doug Basham.

    There was at least one other person of some note who was also against the Iraq War back then.

    That would have been Donald Trump.

    • Replies: @Jay Fink
  395. Jay Fink says:
    @Lee

    Yes and that’s one of the reasons I voted for him twice. I think that was a huge deal to the elites and one of the reasons he scared the hell out of them. It showed he has independent thought and would not necessarily go along with any warmongering plans they had.

  396. Jay Fink says:
    @Ima idiot

    Note that neither Iran or Iraq had anything to do with 9-11. 15 of the 19 911 terrorists were Saudi but we would never consider going to war with our good friends the Saudis. I’ll be honest about the true reason for that…Saudi is in an unholy alliance with Israel. They have common enemies in the Middle East.

  397. A Jew Troll says Anglin conspired with Jews

    copied his site from trollden called DNAWars run by Weev

    Site is lol, site is based, site predates DS by years.

    Programmed to Hate – programmed the DailyStormer
    https://dnawars.wordpress.com/2009/03/11/youre-programmed-to-hate/

    WEEV

    WE WANT WEEV ON UNZ

  398. Jeshurun Tsarfat is JT = Jewish Troll = WEEV

  399. Anonymous[302] • Disclaimer says: • Website
    @GeneralRipper

    BS. About 90% of lung cancer is directly tied to smoking, with the rest of it coming from black lung disease (working in coal mines). It’s the one type of cancer that’s nearly impossible to get, unless you smoke.

    Regarding cigars, they aren’t a healthier alternative to cigarettes. You can get lung, throat, oral cancer.

    From John’s Hopkins University website:
    “All tobacco products contain nicotine and cancer-causing substances, which increase the risk of lung cancer. According to the National Cancer Institute, for instance, cigar smoke may contain even more toxic substances than cigarettes, due to the way the tobacco is cured. Cigars also contain more tar and are smoked for longer than cigarettes, adding to their harm.”

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  400. Anonymous[302] • Disclaimer says:
    @Dumbo

    Women can work around weird, especially if he’s a billionaire. And Zuck helped create something most women use—social media, and that’s very cool to them. If they go for weird looking unconventional rock stars, then they can go for Zuck. All he needs is a personal stylist and he can nail as many as he can get his hands on.

    Rush’s first two wives were with him when he was broke. That’s definitely on him, as he couldn’t keep them.

    Not sure why he’s always been given a pass on multiple marriages. What makes you think that decent looking or even hot looking women want to stick around a dude who’s unattractive, obese, and doesn’t attempt to improve his overall physical appearance? It goes both ways. Not many men would bang an obese, slobbish, ugly woman, even if they had money. That’s what separates men from women—-women can work around it, at least for awhile. It’s up to the man to hold onto what he gets.

    • Replies: @John Johnson
  401. I discovered Rush about 30 years ago and after a few of those years passed by, and I grew weary of the schtick and constant shilling for war, I had to ask myself just what in the hell was this “conservatism” that this fat man bloviated about! Conserve? Conserve what? Conserve an out of control government and military that endlessly prowls the earth in search of devils du-jour which it creates out of whole cloth to later destroy and claim some sort of moral high ground in doing so? The absurdities piled on and I began to see him, like Trump, as some sort of charlatan masquerading amongst the hoi-poloi with a cigar clenched between his teeth, and a raised middle finger, laughing all the way to the bank. He was a pill popping poseur with the narcissistic gall to, correctly point out the leftist hypocrisy, while conveniently ignoring his own.

  402. @Priss Factor

    I’m waiting for the day the Zulu king is portrayed as white. The wailing of the leftist damned would be apocalyptic

  403. Anonymous[309] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anonymous

    And your misinformed or insane one speck of carbide in the lung will give you lung cancer and hundreds of thousands were exposed to this in thousands of machine shops across America, I had a run with it only I had an honest Dr. he asks me if I smoked and replied I did he said you know a third of that type of cancer is caused by smoking and I replied what causes the other two thirds, work place environment was his reply, then I happened to think of all those metal bars I machined with the labels on them that stated breathing the fumes from machining this can cause lung cancer and without a doubt caused many cancers which got blamed on [email protected]@

  404. Mr. Allen says: • Website

    Rush was a master spinner of news to make his listener feel better about the world. Don’t blame him. But he did also whitewash hate and intolerance – in a real sense that people got hurt.

    Think China virus and how many Asian Americans are suffering …

    Fry in Hell Rush….

  405. @Ima idiot

    That he had cooled a bit on fighting wars in the Middle East is explainable by the passing of time and changes in the world situation. Maybe he thought what good could be done by those adventures had been done. Or, maybe he saw that the GWOT had been a mistake, or at least needed a fresh look.
    So many of the commentariat here want to paint him in the worst light, when perhaps they could do with a little self- examination.

    It’s far more than the wars.

    He indoctrinated millions of conservatives into believing that “big government” is always the problem and that deregulation/free trade is always good.

    This really just plays to the Democrats. If a “Free market” solution doesn’t work all you can do is stomp your feet and yell louder. Maybe that works for a radio entertainment show but in the real world it just favors the Democrats in the long term. If anything Rush ultimately worked in the Democrat’s favor. The fact that even his fans say that he “slowed the coming end” shows that there was never a viable strategy to defeat the left. The NSDAP was a much smarter strategy before Hitler took the party over but the typical indoctrinated dittohead boomer will never understand that.

    Con Inc commentators sew defeat among conservatives. It’s an all or nothing strategy. If the US doesn’t embrace minimal government and apple pie (along with unequal health care access and poverty) then oh well the best is in the past. That is really how he encourages people to think. If the people don’t embrace free trade and private health care then the Commies won so let’s go golf and talk about Reagan. They aren’t serious about defeating the left.

    The achilles heel of the left has always been genetics. Con Inc thought they could route the left while adopting race and genetic denial but with a “Free market” wrapping. That strategy totally failed and even worse they can’t even bring themselves to admit it.

  406. @Mr. Allen

    Think China virus and how many Asian Americans are suffering …

    What are you talking about? The recent attacks against Asians in SF and NY?

    Those were by Blacks and that was a problem before the virus.

    Why should it not be called the China virus? Odds are they lost control of it in the lab that just happened to be nearby the wet market.

    Eventually that will come out and the MSM will look completely biased and stupid…..again.

    • Replies: @Mr. Allen
  407. @Anonymous

    Not sure why he’s always been given a pass on multiple marriages. What makes you think that decent looking or even hot looking women want to stick around a dude who’s unattractive, obese, and doesn’t attempt to improve his overall physical appearance? It goes both ways. Not many men would bang an obese, slobbish, ugly woman, even if they had money. That’s what separates men from women—-women can work around it, at least for awhile.

    No it isn’t that simple. There are very real differences in what men and women are attracted to.

    Women are more attracted to confidence and power/influence.

    Men will happily take a hot chick will low self-esteem. Women will be more attracted to the over-confident a-hole even if he not as handsome as other men they have access to.

    It’s kind of an evolutionary leftover.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  408. Mr. Allen says:
    @John Johnson

    MSM is completely biased and stupid. Completely agree!

    But so is Rush …. and frankly what you just wrote. Completely irrational and groundless accusations

    Just saying…

    • Replies: @John Johnson
  409. @Mr. Allen

    But so is Rush …. and frankly what you just wrote. Completely irrational and groundless accusations

    What exactly is irrational and groundless?

    The virus outbreak just happened to occur in a wet market next to their main virology lab. That isn’t disputed.

    If you want to take the Chinese and MSM position that this is just a grand coincidence then go right ahead.

    I don’t see rationality in taking the position that requires lottery type odds for it to occur.

  410. @stevennonemaker88

    JohnPlywood is a troll and an idiot, who makes no sense.

    No no no. JP’s thought process gives one an excellent sense of a troll idiot without having to shove him off your porch, say, in the event he were selling subscriptions to HuffPost.

  411. @Mr. Allen

    We live in LA Chinatown and associate with Asian-Americans all day, all the time (including my Asian wife, lol). We have doctors and dentists who are Asian, and living the high life, compared to the great majority of Americans, like many other doctors and dentists. I work with many Asian professionals who are doing well and have secure jobs and peaceful neighborhoods.

    We must have missed this widespread suffering.

    Moreover, as a white man, I wager I’m more at risk of a racially targeted hate attack than Asians. And in fact, I suffer a permanent spinal injury from an explicitly racial assault sustained in tolerant good ol’ Los Angeles in broad daylight; we don’t know any Asian person who has suffered such around here, although there must be some given the size of the Asian population here.

    If you’re referring to violence against Asians in the USA, that is disproportionately inflicted by Africans, like physical aggression generally in the USA. I don’t think that the African attackers and muggers of Asians in Cali or anywhere else were avid listeners of “conservative” talk radio, do you?

  412. Mr. Allen says:

    I guess by your logic, there is no racial violence in general in this nation. I mean I just saw two white police walk by several black men with no issues last week with my own eyes.

    So whatever issues there may be must not be “widespread.”

    Some can live forever in their bubble….

    In the real world there are people getting killed and injured because of rising hate fanned by the ilks of Rush. I grew up in LA and now resides in SF. In local newspapers here – as well as LA Times, I saw several stories about rising violence against Asians every week this past year.

    Had been a “Dittoes” fan of Rush since my college days in the late 1980’s. Drastically changed my tune and saw my mistake this past year as a result of Covid.

    I write this as an insider. A compatriot. It’s sad to see what the American right has become recently.

  413. Anomaly says:
    @Schuetze

    Boobus Americans! Haha! Are you a fan of Revilo Oliver?

  414. @Bolteric

    I wanted to read something interesting on his passing today, and I knew CNN, Fox, NYT and WaPo weren’t going to fit the bill.

    Peter Brimelow had a good review of Limbaugh’s history on immigration issues:

    https://vdare.com/articles/rush-limbaugh-made-up-his-mind-on-immigration-sadly-he-didn-t-do-much-about-it

    Rush was against the proposed amnesty under W, but didn’t really do much else to oppose the non-White invasion.

    FTN (podcast) with a longer form Limbaugh obit:

    https://therightstuff.biz/2021/02/21/ftn-384-talent-on-loan-from-yahweh/

    One interesting (and rather damning) factoid that they cited: rushlimbaugh.com has transcripts of all of his shows, and has a decent search function. Limbaugh’s audience was largely blue collar Whites, who were hit hardest by the opioid epidemic — not to mention that Rush himself had a serious problem with OxyContin addiction.

    Yet if you search rushlimbaugh.com for “Purdue Pharma” (the privately-owned corporation that produced and marketed OxyContin) you get exactly two results — jack and s–t. “Sackler” (the family that owns Purdue)? Just a single mention of the “Tufts University Sackler School of Biomedical Sciences” — oy vey, such “philanthropists.”

    What did the (((Sacklers))) have to say about their drug that killed hundreds of thousands of White Americans?

    https://www.businessinsider.com/ap-prosecutor-drug-maker-pushed-oxycontin-despite-danger-signs-2019-1

    Richard Sackler, senior executive at Purdue Pharma:

    “The launch of OxyContin Tablets will be followed by a blizzard of prescriptions that will bury the competition. The prescription blizzard will be so deep, dense, and white,” he said, according to the documents.

    “White?”

    Just a cohencidence, goy. Life expectancy for White Americans has been dropping for 20+ years:

    https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/6_casedeaton.pdf

    And the (((Sacklers))) are a big part of the reason why:

    See also:

    https://forward.com/fast-forward/385375/the-jewish-family-making-billions-from-the-opioid-crisis/

    http://dailystormer.su/profit-from-pain-whos-behind-americas-opiate-epidemic/

    But Rush never said a single word about it…

    The Sacklers were never prosecuted for their crimes, of course. And they were allowed to hide billions of their ill-gotten gains overseas because jew privilege. But at least they’re being sued in civil court for their crimes, right? Well, all of those cases were consolidated under a single judge named Dan Aaron Polster. And what does Polster have to say about the prospects for “justice” in this case? He openly gloats that when it comes to judging the guilt of his fellow tribesmen for their crimes against the goyim, he’ll be guided entirely by the “principle” of… sacralized ethnonarcissm.

    https://www.clevelandjewishnews.com/news/local_news/judaism-provides-direction-for-polster-in-landmark-opioid-case/article_3901b1bc-c8b8-11e8-b123-ffac8811ef9f.html

    “Judaism provides direction for Polster in landmark opioid case”

    Well isn’t that nice. Systemic semitism in action.

  415. @RedpilledAF

    He was an obedient Shabbos Goy.

    Oy vey! That sounds like some kind of “anti-semitic canard,” or something. Let’s see what the narrative promoters at the Jewish Telegraph Agency have to say:

    His ardent pro-Israel views helped that strain of policy become commonplace in both parties.

    Limbaugh “was a great friend of Israel and he stood by us through thick and thin, always firm, never wavering,” Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said on Twitter.

    Those postures helped make Limbaugh friends in the Jewish establishment. He attended the wedding of the daughter of Malcolm Hoenlein, the executive vice chairman of the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations

    Zev Chafets, a Jewish biographer who earned rare access to Limbaugh for his 2010 book, “An Army of One,” said Limbaugh’s outsize influence and his friendliness with Israel set an example for other talk radio conservatives.

    “He was very cautious about not saying anything disparaging American Jews as a collective ever,” Chafets said in an interview Wednesday. “It was very important considering the possibilities of anti-Semitism on the right that the biggest and most powerful voice in that community over 30 years was very clearly anything but an ‘anti-Semite’.”

    How about JNS?

    In July of 1993, Limbaugh went on a five-day visit to Israel, where he said he learned a great deal about what the dispute in the Middle East was all about. There, he met Prime Minister Yitzchak Rabin, he visited the Western Wall; went to the Yad Vashem Holocaust museum and memorial in Jerusalem with Benjamin Netanyahu, who was at the time the leader of the opposition; and visited the Golan Heights, even commanding an IDF tank.

    So way back in 1993, he:
    kowtowed to the Wailing Wall
    -Worshiped at the Vatican of Holocaustianity
    -Visited the occupied territories and explicitly endorsed Zionist aggression

    Well OK then. Butt goy indeed. Did I mention that Rush hated Ron Paul because he viewed him as inadequately supportive of wars for Israel?

    • Agree: RedpilledAF
  416. @SMK

    “Virtually everyone” who believes in God and the afterlife, whether in Heaven or Hell, envisions the “soul” are an invisible spirit, immaterial person, a disembodied mind. Assuming, purely for the sake of argument, that an afterlife, whether in Hell or Heaven, exists and that the “soul” is a mind with no body who lives for eternity…blablabla

    Yawn. There’s a reason why they people like “SMK” are generally referred to as “ignorant, hate-filled Christophobes,” rather than merely “hate-filled Christophobes.”

    See, if a semi-normal person were to contemplate spewing this noxious mixture of vitriolic hatred and confused misconceptions of Christian doctrine across the interwebz, he would think: “Gosh, perhaps I should consult a primary source in order to actually learn something about Christianity before I embarrass myself further?”

    They would then exhibit the minimal agency required to perform an internet search for something like “resurrection of the body” + “Catechism of the Catholic Church” or “Luther’s Small Catechism” or “Apostles’ Creed” — some simple, straightforward first step toward filling their nearly bottomless pit of ignorance — before blabbering incoherently about the wholly feelz-based strawman that they “assumed” to exist. But atheistic Christophobes like “SMK” not only believe that hatred is somehow “morally superior” to love, and that shameless mendacity is “morally superior” to truth — they believe that wilful ignorance is “morally superior” to knowledge.

    Sad!

    This noisome stew of end-stage Dunning-Krugerism, mindless hatred, and a wholly misplaced sense of “moral superiority” is not only characteristic of atheistic Christophobes — it’s precisely what makes shitlibs in general so repulsive to normal people.

  417. Anonymous[384] • Disclaimer says:
    @John Johnson

    Women are attracted to men with money. They are hypergamous, and go for the best deal they can get. If Rush had been a fat slobbish, late 50’s Walmart greeter, he wouldn’t have stood a chance at getting married to a halfway decent woman.

    Confidence, a’holery is good, but money is the deal maker. To suggest otherwise and that it’s not about the money is to deny reality.

  418. Robertus says:
    @JohnPlywood

    I just realize you don’t respond to any of the points I make, you ignored the study i linked and reposted the same data, when the other guy showed a counter study you ignored it and repeated what you usually say which is all general statements and wordplay. Could you be more original? The study I linked is still there waiting for your criticism.

  419. Rush Limbaugh, the great carnival barker of our time, the PT Barnum of our age, has apparently expired. His talents could possibly only be matched by that other grand poobah of our age, that being one Howard Stern. They both exude true and passionate contempt for the morons who followed them and stuffed their pockets beyond belief. WE, the imbeciles (goyim) who listened are for sure the worse off for the overall experience, having surrendered our consciousness, our capacity for self examination and rational thought to some huckster. But then, that is the genetic marker of the goy….always seeing, always hearing, but NEVER understanding. If there is a God in heaven, perhaps one day, he will take pity on us all, and with a wave of HIS magic wand, make us all whole again. Until then, fellow goy, do the best you can to be something you are not….a “thinker”, and not a “follower”.
    God help us all.

  420. Sunshine says:
    @Casey Jones

    He’s just speaking the truth. It isn’t pleasant nor is it socially acceptable to speak ill of the dead, but we are past the point of adhering to social niceties. It’s time for plain speaking, if we are ever to turn this country around. This pussyfooting around is what has allowed this country to fall so far, so fast. And yes, it was spearheaded by Boomers, like Rush.

    Don’t get me wrong, I listened to Rush when I was a kid, I really enjoyed his show, but as someone with opinions and beliefs more aligned with Anglin, I tuned out a long time ago. I don’t hate Rush, he had his time and was very influential in many positive ways, but he did “take the ticket” to keep his comfortable life. Pointing this out isn’t evil, and I think you know that.

  421. Today America mourns the death of Rush Limbaugh. And today Rush Limbaugh mourns the discovery that in Hell, the pills make the pain worse, the hookers are all trannies, and the buffets are riddled with maggots.

    “The Second Round of Ninth Circle is called Antenora named after Antenor. He was the soldier from Troy who cheated on his own city to the Greeks. Here, the souls of people who betrayed their country are punished. ”

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Andrew Anglin Comments via RSS