The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 Kevin MacDonald Archive
Neocons, Ukraine, Russia, and the Western Struggle for Global Hegemony
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information


Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

Part of this was originally posted in 2014 but remains relevant, with some updates/elaborations, as noted.

Philip Giraldi has a nice column on the continuing power of the neocons, particularly in the Ukraine situation (“Diplomacy is a Four-Letter Word“).

The vitriol unloaded on Russia since the rise of Vladimir Putin and most recently to ridicule almost every aspect of the Olympic Games is astonishing. …

The sustained pressure on the Ukraine over the past several months has likewise been remarkable and, under other circumstances, it would all be difficult to explain but for the fact that it and Russia are essentially two halves of one policy that is being orchestrated by the same group of neoconservatives, some of whom have now, fortuitously enough, attached themselves to the party in power in the White House, which is the Democrats. It was easy enough to do as many neocons are basically liberal Democrats if one excludes their aggressive foreign policy views.

Right. The neocons are too often associated only with the Republicans, but historically the neocons have had a strong position in the Democratic Party and have pulled the Republicans to the left on vital issues such as immigration. Indeed, a very important strand came out of the far left Trotskyist followers of Max Shachtman, a Jewish labor leader who, by the time of his death, had made major inroads in the Democratic Party and whose legacy is still with us today.

The Trotskyist movement had a Jewish milieu as Shachtman attracted young Jewish disciples—the familiar rabbi/disciple model of Jewish intellectual movements. … He became the quintessential rabbinical guru—the leader of a close, psychologically intense group. …

By the late 1950s he moved into the mainstream of U.S. social democracy” with a strategy of pushing big business and white Southerners out of the Democratic Party (the converse of Nixon’s “Southern strategy” for the Republican Party). In the 1960s “he suggested more openly than ever before that U.S. power could be used to promote democracy in the third world”—a view that aligns him with later neoconservatives. …

In 1972, shortly before his death, Shachtman, “as an open anti-communist and supporter of both the Vietnam War and Zionism,” backed Senator Henry Jackson in the Democratic presidential primary. Jackson was a strong supporter of Israel (see below), and by this time support for Israel had “become a litmus test for Shachtmanites.” (see “Neoconservatism as a Jewish Movement,” p. 17).

So the Shactmanites ended up supporting an aggressive foreign policy, exemplified by Henry Jackson, a cold warrior and the most visible supporter of Israel in the U.S. Senate. One of Shachtman’s many Jewish disciples was Carl Gershman, who is now head of the National Endowment for Democracy (NED) but in his youth was associated with the Young People’s Socialist League and the Social Democrats, USA, both on the far left. Regarding the role of the NED in the Ukraine crisis, Giraldi has this to say:

Remember the pastel revolutions in Eastern Europe that were sponsored by the United States and some western nations but which are now best forgotten? Involvement of Non-Government Organizations (NGOs) in places like the Ukraine and Moldova sure turned out well, particularly when the biggest baddest NGO of all, the National Endowment for Democracy (NED) got involved. When the Russians and others complained about the activities of NGOs interfering in their domestic politics NED was what they were referring to. NED instinctively favored people who called themselves democrats and were able to speak English, polyglot ability somehow demonstrating their political reliability. They turned out to be as corrupt as their predecessors and no less inclined to fool around with the electoral system they inherited. Tinkering in Georgia by Washington and its Israeli surrogates almost led to American involvement in a war with Russia in which Washington had no conceivable interest. Remember John McCain’s “We are all Georgians now?”

After wrecking Eastern Europe NED has gone on to do yeoman’s work relating to the Arab Spring, the results of which are clearly visible in Tunisia, Egypt and Iraq. But now the focus is again on the former Soviet Union with millions of dollars going to opposition parties, this time with the full force of an uncritical mainstream media behind the effort. Easily forgotten are two indisputable facts relating to Russia and the Ukraine. First, before the Soviet Union broke up in 1991, there was an understanding that the US and Europe would not use the situation as an excuse to expand their spheres of influence into Eastern Europe. NED and other groups violated that understanding almost immediately and now Croatia, the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Bulgaria, Romania, Slovenia, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Romania and Poland are in the European Union and also in NATO, an organization that has absolutely no raison d’etre apart from serving as a military alliance against Russia. …

Second … The Ukraine is roughly seventy-five per cent Ukrainian ethnically but ten million Ukrainian citizens are ethnic Russians, more than 17% of the population. Many Ukrainians therefore look to Russia as a natural ally and trading partner while those who once were part of Poland tend to look westward, but what is indisputable is that the current mildly pro-Moscow Ukrainian government of Viktor Yanukovych came to power after a free election monitored by international observers in 2010. Yanukovych believes in strong ties to Russia but is also friendly to the European Union and the United States. In spite of that studied neutrality Washington and the Europeans are stirring up unrest and trying to coerce the Ukrainian government into entering into a formal arrangement with the EU that its elected leadership believes to be not in its best interests. Protesters, supported and possibly even trained and equipped by Europe and the US, have responded with violence.

Giraldi then traces Victoria Nuland’s impeccable neocon credentials and her typically neocon hostility toward Russia, concluding:

Like her husband, Nuland, backed by the White House and politicians including Senators John McCain and Lindsey Graham, is consistently hostile to Moscow, possibly because the neocon world view favors the predominantly Jewish oligarchs who looted the Russian economy before being brought to heel by Putin.

Added: Victoria Nuland is currently the Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs in the Biden State Department and was the Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs at the Department of State in the Obama administration. She is no doubt playing a very important role during the current crisis. Her husband is Robert Kagan, “a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution, has been an advocate for just about every U.S. foreign policy blunder over the past two decades. He was an advocate for the war in Iraq and a muscular approach to Syria. The New York Times reported that his father, Donald Kagan, “a historian of ancient Greece, is a patriarch of neoconservatism.”


There is awareness of Nuland’s role in some conservative circles; on February 25, Tucker Carlson mentioned her in talking about the main promoters, as did Pedro Gonzalez of Chronicles in a separate segment. But of course they won’t discuss that she is Jewish and deeply involved in rabidly pro-Israel and globalist foreign policy circles.

… I am sure that Russia’s support of Iran and Syria also feed into the mix of neocon motives for hostility to Russia, but there is no question that the neocons have been strong supporters of the oligarchs, doubtless because it would be good for the Jews. As I noted:

A turning point was the arrest and imprisonment of Mikhail Khodorkovsky, the head of Yukos, the oil giant. Arch-neocon Richard Perle led the charge against Putin, calling for the ouster of Russia from the G-8 — the same sort of policy the neocons are proposing in the wake of the invasion of Georgia. Khodorkosky was viewed as without any feeling for Russian nationalism and far too friendly with the United States. (“The Neocons Versus Russia“)

Putin basically prevented a takeover of Russia by oligarchs with globalist, Western values. I therefore rather doubt that the NED is really concerned about democracy in the Ukraine, despite its official mission. After all, as Giraldi notes, the government of Ukraine is duly elected in an internationally supervised election, and neocons (and the U.S.) have a long history of looking the other way when non-democratic governments meet their interests (e.g., overlooking the egregious departures from democracy in Israel [and supporting Saudi aggression in Yemen]) and excoriating democratically elected governments when they do not (e.g., Hamas in the Gaza). Indeed, the classic neocon statement on democracy and human rights, by Gershman’s [one-time] boss, Jeanne Kirkpatrick (1979), argued that democracy and human rights should take a back seat to other issues, such as the Cold War struggle between the U.S. and the USSR (discussed here, p. 31). (Gershman, along with Joshua Muravchik and Kenneth Adelman, was a deputy to Kirkpatrick when she served as UN Ambassador in the Reagan administration. All were strong proponents of the Iraq war, Adelman writing a famous column “Cakewalk in Iraq.”)

It’s the same now. The real name of the game is not democracy but the neocon crusade against Russia, with a strong dose of Jewish motivation related to Putin, the failure of the oligarchs to seize control of Russia, and Israel.

Added, February 27, 2022:

I recently posted a lecture by Prof. John Mearsheimer which, as I tweeted, is “obviously compelling” and where he provides a solution—a neutral Ukraine—that would have avoided war. Note that Philip Giraldi pointed out that the Yanukovych government was effectively neutral. This was unacceptable to the neocons, and hence the 2014 Maidan uprising that replaced Yanukovych—a revolution that Nuland and other elements of the U.S. foreign policy establishment were deeply involved.

But of course, this solution never happened. And we have to ask why the U.S. is so committed to hostility toward Russia—determined to surround Russia’s Western border with a military alliance that the U.S. would never tolerate in North America (as it piously recites the Monroe Doctrine; remember the Cuban missile crisis?). As Mearsheimer suggests, the U.S. is the instigator here, pressuring Ukraine or at least encouraging it to insist on joining NATO.

Here is Mearsheimer on the current crisis. In the first 25 minutes he lays out the historical background in great detail. Key points amply illustrating the aggressiveness if the West.

  • 2008: NATO declared Ukraine will be in NATO; Russians are angry but that’s as far as it goes.
  • 2014: Western (U.S. State Department, neocon, CIA) coup installed a pro-Western government which results in civil war in Ukraine and Russia seizing Crimea;
  • Trump [with anti-tank weapons but not air defense weapons] and now Biden (but not Obama) arm Ukraine, making it a “de facto” NATO member;
  • a number of provocative NATO military incursions into Russian territorial waters [although these claims are denied by the U.S. and Britain].

This is a very cynical game. Mearsheimer predicted in 2015 that Russia would destroy Ukraine rather than allow it to be part of NATO, and it is in the process of being destroyed now, with immense suffering and unknown loss of life.

So fundamentally, we have to ask why our elites hate Russia. As noted in my 2014 article, a major reason — and indeed by far the most important reason at this point — is Russia’s foreign policy in the Middle East in support of Iran and Syria (where Russia’s support turned the tide in favor of the Assad government against the U.S.- and Israel-backed rebels). A Russian defeat in Ukraine would dramatically change the balance of power in the Middle East in favor of Israel and its client state, the U.S..

So why should that matter to Russia? Certainly, there’s no evidence that Putin is anti-Jewish or hostile to Israel. I suspect that Putin sees the Middle East in the same way he sees Europe—as having the potential for further encirclement of Russia by Western-dominated governments. Recall: neocons also want regime change in Iran and were enthusiastic supporters of the anti-Assad forces in Syria. Interestingly, Trump resisted pressures to attempt regime change in Iran advocated by his neocon advisers John Bolton (uber-hawk installed at the insistence of Sheldon Adelson, a pro-Israel fanatic and Trump’s largest donor) and Mike Pompeo.

President Trump appeared to dash the hopes of his neoconservative foreign policy advisors when he explicitly rejected a strategy of regime change for Iran on Monday. … “We’re not looking for regime change. I want to make that clear… No one wants to see terrible things happen.”

The President specified that his driving principle was to prevent Iranian acquisition of nuclear weapons, as opposed to a utopian ideal of imposing a western-style ‘liberal democracy’ upon the Islamist state.

But with the senile, incompetent Biden (described by Pepe Escobar as “the senile President of the United States [who is controlled] by earpiece/teleprompter [and] was never accused of being the brightest bulb in the room – any room”) reading lines written by the likes of Nuland and with Obama (who rejected arming Iran) and Trump out of office, it’s a new ballgame.

So let’s look at a map of Eurasia from Putin’s point of view:

The West has already shown its intentions in the Middle East and Afghanistan (the latter a miserable failure). But it’s clear they also want regime change in Kazakhstan, where just last month there was an attempt at a “color revolution.” This story did not make much of a dent in Western media, but “In Moscow, it [received] 24/7 news coverage, like it’s an apocalyptic threat to Russia’s security.It failed when the Russian-dominated Collective Security Treaty Organization (Russia, Armenia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and Belarus) sent in troops. The attempted revolution was widely believed to be have been aided by the Western powers.

Russia obviously saw the attempted revolution as an existential threat and sees Ukraine, already close to being a de facto NATO member, in a similar manner. Russia would be effectively surrounded. From Russia’s perspective, an invasion of Ukraine was the only possible response to all this.

The big picture is that in the end it’s all about Western hegemony and “Western values” being imposed on the rest of the world, and this has been explicitly expressed by the U.S. State Department just last Thursday:

State Department spokesman Ned Price made a stunning admission regarding what this war is really all about.

According to Price, Russia and China “also want a world order”, but he warned that if they win their world order “would be profoundly illiberal”…


China has given “tacit approval” for Russian President Vladimir Putin’s latest invasion of Ukraine, in the judgment of U.S. officials, as part of a joint effort to undermine the institutions that American and allied leaders established to minimize conflict in the decades following World War II.

“Russia and the PRC also want a world order,” State Department spokesman Ned Price said Wednesday. “But this is an order that is and would be profoundly illiberal. … It is an order that is, in many ways, destructive rather than additive.” (emphasis in original)

In other words, “making the world safe for democracy”—and replacement-level immigration and LGBTQ+ gender ideology, and the cauldrons of ethnic conflict that Western societies have become. Neither China nor Russia want that; nor do many people in the West, and certainly including several Eastern European governments and a large portion of their people.

And note the inclusion of China, another non-democratic government not at all committed to “Western values.” After the fall of the Soviet Union, the neocons led the chorus of those celebrating a unipolar world dominated by the U.S. as hegemon, the result being repeated attempts at regime change throughout the Middle East, North Africa, and Asia. What’s going on now is essentially some serious pushback against that—an attempt to establish a multipolar world. China’s support for the Russian invasion is part and parcel of this and is sure to have been on the mind of the State Department in issuing their statement. But what this means is that the status of the U.S. and its Western partners as world hegemon is in serious jeopardy. It’s an Armageddon-like moment: neither side sees losing as an option.

Lastly, one wonders whether Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky’s Jewish identity has a role in understanding the Ukrainian response. JTA:

Zelensky has not elaborated on the details of his Jewish upbringing, or his religiosity, but he also hasn’t shied away from expressing an occasional message of Jewish pride and a strong sense of solidarity with Israel. And that Jewish identity has been repeatedly seized on by enemies and rivals, and celebrated by Jewish supporters around the world.

Would a different president have been more open to rejecting NATO status and all that implies for Western the expansion of the Western imperium? More willing to avoid the destruction of his country and unspeakable suffering for the Ukrainian people? Unlikely we’ll even know.

As I write this, the war continues to escalate and there are widespread reports that Ukrainians, encouraged by Zelensky, are putting up significant resistance and frustrating the Russian advance. Russia can hardly be expected to back off at this point. Given the Armageddon-like stakes in this battle, it’s likely the West will also escalate, heading the entire world into completely uncharted territory.

(Republished from The Occidental Observer by permission of author or representative)
Hide 22 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. Dr. Doom says:

    The post-WWII order is old and outdated.
    That talk of “winning” The Cold War is misleading.

    The Global Hegemony used to be a Chessboard of Capitalism and Communism.
    A unilateral chessboard just was not workable.

    The series of Zion Wars further erased the prestige and treasure of the West.
    What’s left now is just a bluff and a charade.

    Russia and China see the weakness of the West.
    The West is imploding from Zion Pig mismanagement.

    A New World Order is emerging. Based on Ethnonationalism.
    The Zion Pigs are yesterdays hegemons. They will not last.

    Change is the only constant. Zion Pigs never adapt.
    They are stupid and now outdated and unable to adapt.

    The Zion Pigs reliance on “diversity” ensures their elimination.
    Ethnic States expel and destroy parasites and their predations.

  2. JimDandy says:

    “I am sure that Russia’s support of Iran and Syria also feed into the mix of neocon motives for hostility to Russia….”

    Me too.

    “Would a different president have been more open to rejecting NATO status and all that implies for Western the expansion of the Western imperium? More willing to avoid the destruction of his country and unspeakable suffering for the Ukrainian people? Unlikely we’ll even know.”

    I think we know. The Ukrainians would be better off right now if they had a president whose first loyalty was to Ukraine instead of what they actually have–a president who is loyal to a foreign power that he is a citizen of.

    Anyway, thanks once again for another fantastic piece, Kevin.

  3. Why do the US elites hate Russia? The same reason that they hate China, Latin America, the Arab world, Africa and most of their own population. Because hatred is their religion, which explains why Zionazis and Judeofascists, heirs to the long continuous cult of xenophobic hatred of others, are now so utterly dominant in Thanatopolis DC.

    • Agree: Kolya Krassotkin
  4. Me root’n for Poot’n.

    • Replies: @Wokechoke
  5. That disgusting “Democracy”, meaning rule by career politicians… Yuck! Spew!

    • Replies: @Realist
    , @Curmudgeon
  6. neutral says:

    the Western Struggle for Global Hegemony

    It needs to be made clear that the West was never about global hegemony, this was always driven by the jews, gentiles that were ambitious could only achieve status if they adhered to jew ideologies and worked against white interests. It also must be said that there is no West anymore, whatever you want to call it now this is a civilization that is both anti white and non white, it has absolutely nothing to do with the civilization of the people that once inhabited Western Europe.

    • Agree: beavertales
  7. anon[304] • Disclaimer says:

    India is under enormous pressures to choose sides. It’s enormous benefits wedging itself between the desires of the west and Russia over last 30 years are now in jeopardy. It will be forced to take side by mostly US. Given the close relationships between India and Isarel and between liberal- conservative complex of Indian diaspora in US and UK and global Ziomist ,chances of India benfitting from two superpowers is over and India will move to west camp . Putin should have understood in 2014 that the enemies are circling Russia like a fl ok of vultures .It did not . It allowed too many sanctions on Iran and it allowed India eneter into QUAD thus hurting China . It could have forced Turkey break away from NATO after the coup .
    It could have forced Israel disssociate from the neocons in excahge for less involvement in Syria . Above all Putin could have taken a more hands on role in Libya and prevented NATO bombimgs in exchange for mikitary bases and alliance.

    Today even Hungary is supporting anti Russian stands of the west .

    This war is the war that willl setlle whteher Russia survives or dollar hegemony survives .

  8. Wokechoke says:
    @Ann Nonny Mouse

    He’s probably on the way out into golden retirement if he can keep the land bridge he’s just captured.

  9. All policy now is about salvaging the US Dollar, and keeping Israel’s bodyguard from collapsing.

    This is why Trump was not considered useful to Israel. He was America First, not Israel First. Trump’s policies were about softening the blow to the American worker in an emerging multi-polar century, where America is no longer exceptional.

    The bi-partisan neocon establishment wants American hegemony in the 21st century at all costs, because it’s good for you-know-who.

  10. Realist says:

    So fundamentally, we have to ask why our elites hate Russia.

    Russia is an impediment to continued U. S. hegemony…as is China.

    • Replies: @mulga mumblebrain
  11. Realist says:
    @Ann Nonny Mouse

    That disgusting “Democracy”, meaning rule by career politicians… Yuck! Spew!

    Agreed…plus Democracy is that form of government that allows idiots to vote.

  12. @Ann Nonny Mouse

    This is in need of some minor changes in our post WWII (((globalist))) era, but it fits:
    “Democracy is now currently defined in Europe as a ‘country run by Jews,’” ~ Ezra Pound

  13. neutral says:

    Here is what a wise guru thinks of democracy.

    • Thanks: Realist
  14. Cookie says:

    I can’t understand why the Ukrainians would accept more arms from the West?

    Sure if you want to negotiate a better outcome inflict damage on the invader, but Ukraine has to be realistic, the Russians haven’t come in with their heavy bombers, with their crack troops, with the heavy artillery, it was a show of intentions but if Ukraine doesn’t negotiate it will be a bloodbath.

    Ukraine don’t sacrifice yourself for an American agenda.

    • Replies: @Wokechoke
    , @Thomasina
  15. Wokechoke says:

    Russia has only sent recon/recce so far. Once they start dumping CBU on positions or thermobaric bombs there’s only one outcome. I might add that the Russians also have a fleet of drones for urban combat. We’ve not seen those deployed yet.

  16. Thomasina says:

    “Ukraine don’t sacrifice yourself for an American agenda.”

    I agree, they are no match.

    According to Amazing Polly (a Canadian woman who does fantastic investigative work), it looks like Ukraine has been sacrificed from the get-go (since 1991) when George Soros went in there after the break-up of the U.S.S.R. Was Ukraine set up in order to facilitate corruption?

    Video Link

  17. @Realist

    Not just idiots-swine, thugs, parasites, psychopaths, blackguards, poltroons and paederasts, too. And in Austfailia they MAKE you turn up for the farce and get your name crossed off the rolls. Group guilt.

  18. @Realist

    Russia is not the prime target-China is. There the hatred is visceral, racist, cultural and fear-driven.

    • Replies: @Realist
  19. @anon

    Dollar hegemony is OVER, one way or another, but the moves against Russia, and those to come against China, will finish the job. Inflation is raging, but the Federal Reserve CANNOT raise interest rates because the debt Ponzi would implode. Zugzwang.

  20. They knew the Kremlin would respond. The CIA was prepping Ukrainians for insurgency just like in 1949. This is no longer a secret.

    In addition to what neutral has typed the so-called West has been hijacked and debased.

    ‘Values’ thereof are completely alien to the silent majority such as covering imported rape gangs, trans lunacy, elevating Germaine Greer’s female eunuchs to positions of authority, pretending sub-Saharan Africans invented modernity (see ‘Black Athena’ co-written by Martin Bernal), and psychoanalysis (authors David Bakan and Joseph Berke claim Freud recycled kabbala mysticism). You can include fiat money and reckless trade policies that have wrecked industries promoted by Milton Friedman (refer to ‘Capitalism and Freedom’).

    The bottom line is these people have trashed another country, are willing to risk nuclear war, plus according to Michael Hudson have sparked global economic instability.

Current Commenter

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone

 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Kevin MacDonald Comments via RSS
From the Leo Frank Case to the Present Day
The Surprising Elements of Talmudic Judaism
Analyzing the History of a Controversial Movement