The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 RockaBoatus Archive
My Journey to the Homosexual Question
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

Five years ago, Andrew Joyce wrote a compelling three-part series of articles on “The Alt-Right and the Homosexual Question” (published at AltRight.com). His articles comport well with what I have already concluded about homosexuals and their place among White racialists, especially if a White ethnostate or an American redoubt were to ever emerge in the Pacific Northwest.

In his articles, Joyce addresses and refutes several arguments raised against confronting the homosexual question. This is a sensitive and difficult subject for many, no doubt. Some would prefer not mentioning it at all, while others say we should gladly welcome White homosexuals regardless of their sexual proclivities because, after all, they’re White.

My intention is not so much to rehash Joyce’s thoughts, but to explain in my own way why I believe homosexuality is a deviant way of life and behavior. At its core, it violates the natural or created order of things, that it’s destructive of the family unit which is the foundation of any nation and of Western civilization itself, and that homosexuals in America have been weaponized by the Bolshevik Left to disrupt and ultimately tear apart the fabric of America (quite successfully I might add).

I wish to clarify that my criticism of homosexuals and today’s “gay rights” movement are general in nature. They are not intended to apply to every individual gay man without exception. There are, obviously, nuances, various shades, and differences among homosexuals. They are not a completely monolithic group as some might think. Yet there are enough similarities and consistencies among them so it’s legitimate to do some sober evaluation and criticism. I have described in this article only what I have witnessed, experienced, and deduced after many years of observation.

Growing Up in Hollywood

For almost fifty years my father had a business in Hollywood. He was part of Hollywood’s movie industry, mostly indirectly by providing equipment that might be used on a movie or television set. Amateurs and upstart production companies would purchase various items they might need for their films. His two large warehouses were near Santa Monica Boulevard and Highland Avenue which at the time were at the epicenter for gay prostitution.

As a result, I grew up around some Hollywood celebrities and people who were in the industry. A disproportionate number of them were homosexuals. My exposure to them led me at an early age to form opinions about gays, none which were positive. Although I didn’t quite have a framework in which to make sense of it all, I gradually discovered how strange, deviant and deeply disturbed so many of them seemed to be.

I recall driving to work with my father on the weekends and traveling down Highland Avenue in Hollywood only to see Transvestites swishing about and gesticulating wildly on the sidewalks pretending to be women. I was not only appalled by it, but I wondered how anyone could be so self-deceived. My father never spoke harshly of them, but he did mention on a couple of occasions how screwed up in the head they were.

The homosexuals I encountered were a mixed bag. Some of them were quite normal and I was not even aware of their sexual preferences until much later. They were very much “closeted” and didn’t go about announcing their gayness as many are prone to do.

Others were obviously gay by virtue of their effeminate mannerisms and some of the common stereotypes usually associated with them. They made sure everyone knew it too. Such effeminate mannerisms are ways that homosexuals signal to their own kind and distinguish themselves from the heterosexual majority.

Several of them were repeat customers of my father’s business, and he developed friendships with a good many. The thing that over time stood out the most about the gays I encountered was how seemingly catty and volatile they were. Even though they appeared “normal” and quite together on the outside, they seemed deeply disturbed inside. There was just something ‘off’ about them.

The unusually high sex drive reported about gay men was something I witnessed at times. Other employees and I would often find them in an alley engaged in sex next to a dumpster that we used daily. We had to order them to leave or threaten to call the police on many occasions. Years later I was told by a nurse who worked at a hospital AIDS ward that one of the most difficult tasks in her job was keeping the male AIDS patients out of each other’s beds!

Part of my duties at work was to pick up the lunch orders on certain days when the boss paid for everyone’s lunch. I was sixteen at the time and I didn’t drive. It was very common, however, to get propositioned by men as I was walking to the restaurant to pick up food we ordered.

One place in particular, Arthur J’s, was only a block away and we sometimes ordered food from them. Although I was not aware of it at the time, Arthur J’s, according to a blurb in Gay L.A., was “a phenomenally popular all-night hangout where gay people flocked after the bars closed. Arthur J’s was thought by gay men to be a great place to score. Aristide Laurent, who was a regular in the 1960’s, recalls that the sexual carryings-on had been so rampant in the men’s room at Arthur J’s that the waitresses were ordered to toss a cup of ammonia on the floor hourly so the fumes would preclude anyone from spending more time than was required to use the toilet” (“Queer Maps”).

On one occasion I walked over to Arthur J’s to pick up the lunches we had ordered. When I entered the restaurant, the place was filled with gay men as they gawked at me and made lewd comments. This was in the mid-1970s where many of them wore leather vests and huge mustaches — something right out of The Village People. It was so creepy and uncomfortable that when I returned to the office, I told my father that I would never go there again.

Homosexual Males: A Volatile Lot

My opinions about homosexuals were only confirmed as I got older. I worked security at the ‘Seven Seas’ nightclub on Hollywood Boulevard in the early 1980s. This was the nightclub owned by the late Eddie Nash who was a convicted money launderer and drug dealer. Many believe that Nash was the mastermind behind the Wonderland Murders, although he was never convicted for these crimes.

‘Seven Seas’ was a wild place. It was frequented by teenagers, young adults, and there were plenty of seedy characters always hanging around. A couple of the people who ran the place were gay, and they made sure to bring around their gay friends. One man who appeared to be in his mid-40s always arrived there on the weekends in his Porsche. He was often accompanied by a very young male who I thought to be around 15 or 16 years old. I later discovered that this same male teen brutally murdered his ‘sugar daddy’ while he was sleeping when he learned that he was seeing another boy.

Years later, when I attended the police academy, we had a sheriff’s homicide detective address the class. He worked in the city of West Hollywood which the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department patrolled. This city has a huge gay population, and many consider it the ‘Castro District’ of Los Angeles.

Of the many important things he shared, he told us that murders committed by gay men against their lovers were almost always easily discoverable because of the level of intensity and brutality committed by the perpetrator. It was all very personal. Inordinate levels of jealousy and rage always played a significant role. This is because homosexuals are known to be extremely promiscuous, much more so than the average male heterosexual might be. Sexual fidelity to their ‘partners’ is a rarity among gay men, and when their already unstable unions are violated by unfaithfulness, it frequently results in horrific mutilations and death.

Dangerous and Perverted Sexual Practices

All of us in various ways have our sexual preferences, our unique tastes (so to speak). We succumb in our weaker moments to temptations and lusts, many that we would be ashamed to admit. It’s part of the human condition. The flesh is indeed weak, and it’s a struggle we all must endure (some more than others).

Yet among gay men, the sort of sexual activities they routinely engage in is far beyond the pale of anything that might be deemed “normal.” Aside from anal sex, they engage in fisting, rimming (anus-to-mouth), urolagnia (getting urinated on and drinking urine), coprophilia (sexual stimulation from feces), bug chasing (intentionally infecting oneself with HIV through sex with an infected male), gift giving (intentionally infecting another male with HIV through unprotected sex), and an array of strange sexual practices. Group orgies are also very common among them. Gay men are known to have sex anywhere and anonymous sexual encounters with other men is what many of them prefer.

Is it any wonder, then, why so many gay men in America and Britain have skyrocketing levels of STD’s and are ridden with unusually strong strains of gonorrhea? The infections also tend to spread faster among them because they change partners more quickly. They are also more likely to experience gonorrhea in their throats (see the BBC News article by James Gallagher, “Super-Gonorrhea’s Spread Causing Huge Concern,” April 17, 2016; the article also notes that homosexuals “tend to spread infections a lot faster simply as they change partners more quickly.”).

These people, in general, are neither physically nor mentally healthy when one considers their lifestyle. Some surveys have revealed that rates of depression, suicidal thoughts, various phobias, obsessive-compulsive disorders, as well as drug and alcohol abuse were significantly higher among homosexuals than heterosexuals. How can it not be when one is addicted to the most extreme and dangerous sexual practices imaginable?

The Unnaturalness of Homosexuality

Most of this, of course, is blamed on an “intolerant” society that refuses to accept homosexuals as they are. I don’t believe this for a minute. I’m very much inclined to see it as stemming from the unnaturalness of homosexuality itself. The unnaturalness of homosexuality is plainly evident in that homosexuals are not able to procreate through anal sex. The drive to continue our species is both natural and strong among humans. Since homosexual sex is unable to perform this most basic biological act, it is automatically disqualified from being seen as either healthy, normal or natural.

Moreover, the anus is not meant for sex. It is meant to extract waste and is riddled with bacteria and germs. A good many of the STD’s that infect gay men are the direct result of playing around where they shouldn’t. Constant penetration of the anal wall inevitably creates tears where bacteria and diseases gain entrance into the bloodstream. Anyone who thinks is healthy needs to have their head examined.

All of this is so obviously misguided, yet society is constantly bombarded with messages of how perfectly normal and acceptable homosexuality is. Like the transgender lies the media propagandizes us daily with, so also the propaganda promoting homosexuality and gay marriage is nothing more than beautifully packaged lies.

Pederasty Is Common Among Homosexuals

Since homosexuals cannot procreate, they must recruit. ‘Pederasty’ (sexual relations between men and boys) has been historically common among them, a practice that that’s easily traced to ancient Greece and Roman cultures and beyond. While there have always been homosexuals in every society and culture, it has not always been accepted or tolerated. It’s my impression that homosexuality tends to be more prevalent in societies that are in decline. It should surprise no one that ever since the sexual revolution began in the 1960s – coupled with gay rights and today’s transgender movements – the U.S. has been on a downward spiral.

In the early 1960s, a series of short films were produced to educate the public about the predatory nature of homosexuals who sexually targeted lonely and fatherless boys. These films were introduced not because of some personal hatred toward gays, but because homosexual grooming was so prevalent in big cities such as San Francisco (where playgrounds for children often have signs barring single men). People today mock such films, but this is only because they have been so propagandized by the media and gay advocacy groups to believe that gay grooming is a false and unfair accusation.

Gay activist organizations in the U.S. gladly permitted NAMBLA (North American Man-Boy Love Association) to partake in gay prides throughout America for many years. Yet it was only when pressure came upon gay rights groups to distance themselves from these overt pedophiles that they finally banned their presence from their parades. It was accepted, however, for such a long time as being part-and-parcel of America’s gay rights movement because most homosexuals fully supported sex with prepubescent and teenage boys.

They will not admit this openly, of course, since it would tarnish all their public relations campaigns. They know that most Americans might be able to tolerate two adult males engaging in sex, but this would not be the same sentiment when it comes to man-boy sexual relations. Either way, there is little sense in denying what both history and reality itself reveals – namely, that large numbers of homosexuals prefer to have sexual relations with young boys. Those who tell you otherwise are either lying or grossly ignorant.

Here’s an 11-year-old drag kid known as ‘Amazing Desmond’ who was featured on Good Morning America. Watch as the audience applauds this very confused and manipulated boy. That this would be aired on national television shows what a morally bankrupt nation we’ve become.

Gay Advocacy Groups Engage in Propaganda and Coercion

We must ask ourselves: How sane could any social or political movement be when its entire identity revolves around their sexual preferences and practices? Despite what gay activists might say, their message to the world is really about who they like to have sex with, and why society should fully embrace them. Doesn’t that itself seem bizarre? Can you imagine the level of absurdity that would result if heterosexuals erected organizations and developed nation-wide campaigns to convince everyone that they like having sex with those of the opposite gender? It would be strange indeed, in part, because having relations with the opposite sex is perfectly natural. Such efforts would prove nothing other than what everybody already knows.

Yet homosexual activists and apologists must bend over backwards and engage in great leaps of logic to convince us all that what they do sexually is normal and something we should accept. And what they cannot always accomplish by persuasion, they try to accomplish by coercion, legislation, media manipulation, Hollywood sympathy films, as well as demonizing their opponents and all of society.

For instance, in 1973 the American Psychiatric Association (APA) removed the diagnosis of “homosexuality” from the second edition of its Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM). Prior to that, since its first edition in 1952, “homosexuality” was classified as a mental disorder. This change, however, did not occur as a result of new scientific discoveries, but because gay activist groups intimidated and pressured the APA to toss it out. This has been exhaustively documented by Dr. Jeffrey Satinover in his book, Homosexuality and the Politics of Truth (Baker Book House, 1996), and in a 2007 article he authored titled, “The ‘Trojan Couch’: How the Mental Health Associations Misrepresent Science.”

Homosexuals Oppose Traditional American Values

The family itself must be vilified by gay militants. Traditional marriage must also come under attack and perverted from its original meaning. And for what purpose? So that no one will ever point out the patently obvious truth that man-on-man sex is unnatural and unhealthy.

I suppose one might be inclined to support the gay agenda if gays themselves lived in ways that were moral and circumspect. But often they don’t. Yet they are often the first and loudest to condemn traditional values. Their ‘heroes’ are the likes of Harvey Milk (gay politician), RuPaul (gay drag queen), Larry Kramer (radical gay AIDS activist), Andy Warhol (eccentric gay artist), Pete Buttigieg (openly gay U.S. Secretary of Transportation), and Ellen DeGeneres (lesbian talk show host) to name just a few.

They are celebrated in America only because the country has become unmoored from its traditional moral values.

One might also be inclined to support gay rights if gays themselves were big supporters of Heritage Americans (Whites) and their interests as well as traditional American culture with its strong family values and love of country. But they haven’t and never will because homosexuality is itself rebellion against the natural order. They will always seek to undermine anything that supports normalcy and the marks of traditional society and culture(s). The comparably few that might not are outliers, the exception that proves the rule.

Gays in America largely support left-leaning and overtly cultural-Marxist policies. They are the darlings among liberal Democrats. The brunt of their activism aims at weakening and destroying traditional American institutions such as the family. They infiltrate our public-school systems and propagandize our children with their pro-gay messages. They do so because they rightly recognize that societal acceptance of gays will be easier with each successive generation so long as they are permitted to influence and recruit young people with little parental resistance.

It’s important to understand, then, that gays in America are not about conforming to the essential or characteristic customs and conventions of the greater majority. They are not content to merely be accepted and tolerated in society. No, they must be “celebrated” and told how their sexual proclivities are just as good as heterosexuality. In some cases, we are even told how homosexuality is superior!

Depending on what survey one chooses to believe, gay men comprise only about 4.9% of the overall U.S. population, and yet they influence and dictate a disproportionate amount of American federal and state policies that favor them. This includes enormous federal funding for gay causes and healthcare associated with their high levels of STD’s. The MSM unashamedly supports them. The entire medical establishment stands behind them. Our colleges and universities have established policies that penalize anyone who dares to say something negative about homosexuals, lesbians and transgenders. Yet homosexuals in the media continue to portray themselves as “victims” of a “homophobic” society?!

Some argue that homosexuality has a genetic or biological (e.g., hormonal) basis. Others argue that it’s largely environmental. Whatever the case, the rise of homosexuality to mainstream status in America has proven to be disastrous to the health and future of America. Any social movement that centers its existence on their sexual proclivities – especially those that throughout history have been condemned by almost all societies and cultures – will prove to be of no worth if that same nation desires to survive. Homosexuality produces only sickness and death, as is plainly evident in the AIDS epidemic and the insane levels of sexually transmitted diseases among gay men. And while there may be individual homosexuals who can add value and benefit to society (often seen in the arts), as a group committed to sexual deviancy, they are unable to do so.

The Jewish Role in Advancing Gay Rights

The disproportionate Jewish role in advancing gay rights is well-documented. Jews are quite proud of their role in all of this. They have been on the frontlines in the struggle for homosexual acceptance and have both orchestrated as well as funded the contemporary gay rights movement in the U.S. and Europe. Activist Jews such as Franklin Kameny, who is considered by some to have been the gay rights movement’s Rosa Parks, Edie Windsor, and Thea Spyer; Windsor and Spyer were at the center of a landmark case that struck down the federal bar on same-sex marriages; and many others took a leading role in normalizing homosexuality and in advocating for special rights on behalf of gays.

Back in 2013, Vice-President Joe Biden openly praised the important role Jews played in legalizing same-sex marriage when he was speaking before a Jewish American Heritage Month reception hosted by the Democrat National Committee: “Vice President Joe Biden is praising Jewish leaders for helping change American attitudes about gay marriage and other issues. Biden says culture and arts change people’s attitudes. He cites social media and the old NBC TV series “Will and Grace” as examples of what helped change attitudes on gay marriage. Biden said, “Think — behind of all that, I bet you 85 percent of those changes, whether it’s in Hollywood or social media, are a consequence of Jewish leaders in the industry.” Biden says the influence is immense and that those changes have been for the good. He says Jewish values are an essential part of who Americans are” (Josh Lederman, “Biden: Jewish Leaders Drove Gay Marriage Changes,” Associated Press, May 21, 2013).

Biden’s words proved embarrassing to some Jews who thought his admission fed into stereotypical Jewish “canards” that Jews promote liberal and detrimental social policies. Jews, of course, want to take credit for creating and implementing their Utopian values on the nation, but if anyone dares to claim that these values are deleterious, they are quick to denounce such ‘noticing.’

Like Blacks in America, gays have been weaponized by Jews against traditional Americans. This is not because Jews have historically supported homosexuality. In fact, Judaism throughout the centuries has been opposed to it and the Jewish scriptures explicitly condemn such practices. Jews largely support gay marriage and gay rights because they erode the moral fabric of traditionally Christian America . These practices also help to destabilize the nation so that White racial solidarity could never threaten them as it once did in Germany under National Socialist control. This explains in part why Jews are always quick to create and bolster radical social movements that prove ruinous to the racial and cultural health of Whites.

Conclusion

If America were to break apart, a confederacy of sorts in which politically conservative Red states were to secede from the Union, Whites would be wise to never allow homosexuals positions of influence and power. This doesn’t mean they should be persecuted solely because they are gay, but only that campaigns to normalize and promote homosexuality should be outlawed. Gays who are “closeted” and who keep their sexual proclivities private should be left alone.

However, the minute gays are given a sympathetic platform and permitted to propagandize among us – especially if they were to target our children – there should be harsh penalties. Failure to do so will cause White Americans to fight the same social and political battles all over again.

(Republished from The Occidental Observer by permission of author or representative)
 
Hide 374 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. If everyone were Homosexual, the Human species would go extinct in one generation.

  2. anarchyst says:

    The rate of incidence for sex crimes is about 1 %.
    That is far less than that of Protestants, jewish Rabbis, Boy Scout troopmasters or certainly public school administrators. The leader in sex crimes against children is usually inter family related i.e. step fathers, friends, uncles etc.
    Jewish groups made a crisis, than brought suit against the centralized Catholic Church and in so doing, forever tarnished the clergy who was their archnemesis.

    Free Republic

    Pedophilia Only a Catholic Sin?
    August 14th, 2009 | Kevin Roeten

    [MORE]

    Pedophilia Only a Catholic Sin?

    It turns out pedophilia is an incorrect term, and Catholics aren’t responsible for most of it.

    Shockingly, AP breaks out of their typical liberal mold and reports Insurance companies shed light on extent of sex abuse in Protestant churches, that sexual abuse of minors has been rampant. But in their statement, they indirectly say members of the Catholic Church are not the majority abusers.

    AP discusses the raw numbers from three companies that insure the majority of protestant churches in America (Church Mutual, Guide One, and Brotherhood Mutual), and typically receive 260 reports/yr of people under 18 being sexually abused. Compare that with ~228 credible accusations/yr against Catholic clerics since 1950 (documented abuse records).

    Together with that information, it is known that the Catholic Church greatly outnumbers any specific Protestant denomination, and the data for Protestant churches is available only for the last seven years. Ever since the first sexual abuse cases had been reported, Catholics have had requirements: 1) police background check done on all volunteers,including priests, 2) a second person be present at all religious functions, and 3) all personnel involved with minors must take routine checks with Protecting God’s Children.

    Without a doubt, sexual abuse of a minor is one of the most despicable crimes and sins that man can perpetrate. But predators seem to thrive in an atmosphere where the base congregation is one of the most trusted organizations that exist.

    Philip Jenkins, in his 1996 book Pedophiles and Priests, [[link edited for length]], looked at the problem objectively and dispassionately. Jenkins (who is not Catholic) found that true pedophilia is extremely rare, and perhaps more common among Protestant clergy, and is even more common among married laymen.

    He found that in most sexual abuse cases (under the age of consent), the behavior is actually a variety of homosexuality. This sexual attraction with very young men that combine the charm of boyishness with sexual maturity is actually called ephebophilia. Pedophilia is really a psychiatric term meaning sexual interest in children below the age of puberty.

    The worst sex crimes against children is in the jewish communities and protestant churches.
    Tomasi was not reserved with criticism either and citing data published by the daily Christian Science Monitor, which was founded a hundred years ago by the Christian Science Church, said that the Catholic Church cleaned its house, Jutarnji List writes.
    According to their figures the majority of the US child abuse cases happens in the Protestant churches and Jewish communities, says Tomasi.

    MORE PROTESTANT MINISTERS GUILTY OF PEDOPHILIA THAN CATHOLIC PRIESTS, NEW RESEARCH REVEALS

    A Penn State historian, Philip Jenkins, has done an in depth research of pedophilia and sexual abuse among the clergy and has come up with some rather eye opening facts. It seems that while 1.7 percent of Catholic clergy have been guilty of pedophilia (or sexual abuse particularly of boys), a whopping TEN percent of Protestant ministers have been found guilty of pedophilia!

    This is all the more interesting, notes Jenkins, since there has been NO media term Pastor Pedophilia coined at all!

    Jenkins theorizes that the media, proving the point of the necessity of sexual promiscuity, overemphasizes any instance of pedophilia found among the Catholic clergy since it can use this to criticize the entire idea of celibacy. But it is interesting that the NON celibate Protestant ministers have a MUCH GREATER problem with it than the celibate Catholic priests!

    Protestant pastor pedophilia is not within the frame of our social constructionists as Jenkins calls the media:

    In the 1980s, [Pastor] Leyva had abused perhaps one hundred boys in several Southern states, but few of us ever learned of it. Leyva had the distinction of being a Pentecostal minister and was, therefore, not within the frame of those who were busy constructing reality. The same is true of the three brothers, all Baptist ministers, who were charged with child molestation in the 1990s; the public learned little about this highly unusual series of cases because it was not deemed worthy of dissemination by those fixated on Catholic scandals. [1]

  3. Anon[262] • Disclaimer says:

    The problem is not that there are forces using homos to destroy American values. The problem is no one with any power or authority is standing up for American values.

    • Replies: @American Citizen
    , @1jonny
  4. Russia has taken the approach that gayness should stay in its own lane, and not encroach on heterosexual society.

    It is a recognized fact that homosexuality has been weaponized by predatory globalists to weaken societies that defend faith, culture and family. Russia’s response has been measured and fair.

    Russia has codified into law where the boundaries are between being privately gay and being a threat to the social order. It is up to the judicial branch to ensure that gays aren’t unfairly persecuted and hetero’s aren’t having to live with gay propaganda in their lives.

  5. folkvangr says:

    Get lost already, you dick-obssessed moron. Why is this garbage even in culture section? There should be a separate section on this site, a segregated area for deviants and psychopaths.

  6. @folkvangr

    Weird reaction to a well written article of personal experience. The author shared and it was a learning experience.

    • Agree: SteveK9
    • Replies: @folkvangr
    , @The Real World
  7. faggots are diabolical narcissists, and

    faggotry is an intrinsic part of the

    Kosher Culture of Death:

    abortion, porn, sexperv, miscegnation, and Judeo-“feminism”.

    by which the Jews destroy everything good and decent in the world;

    in particular, White Western Civilization, and

    the White race itself.

  8. anon[397] • Disclaimer says:

    As I see it, if any homosexual sincerely values European Group Selected ethno-nationalism, then he must understand that his homosexuality is a genetic/biological defect, and while requesting to be allowed to live in a prospective European ethno-nationalist nation, he must sincerely believe in working to find scientific ways to remove homosexual genes from the population, such as by screening people to see if they carry unexpressed recessive genes for homosexuality and legally preventing them from reproducing. If the homosexual agrees with these things, then I think it would be humane and an acceptable level of altruism to let the homosexual live out his childless life in an ethno-nationalist nation – after all, it’s not his fault that he was forced to be born by his parents, even though he carried homosexual genes.

    Anyway, in my future vision of a eugenic/transhuman nation, eventually all offspring will be synthetically created in offspring manufacturing factories, and humans will lose the genes causing an innate desire for coitus; it will no longer be pleasurable. At this point, the arguments of heterosexuality versus homosexuality will be obsolete.

    The author mentions that homosexuals seem emotionally defective in other ways too, such as being neurotic, sociopathic, and having very high sex-drives. This would be predicted by Dr. Woodley of Menie, since mutations for maladaptive behaviors often occur together.

    quote: “For instance, in 1973 the American Psychiatric Association (APA) removed the diagnosis of “homosexuality” from the second edition of its Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM).”

    I read that China did the same thing. So much for Richard Lynn’s prediction of China becoming a eugenic nation.

    In the end, homosexuals are Individually Selected Genetic Sociopaths, so yes, they will aggressively oppose any Group Selected population and their collective behavioral traits.

    Sanjay

    • LOL: Jefferson Temple
  9. folkvangr says:
    @Reverend Goody

    This article does not belong here. Let him go to a campus, a school, a public library drag queen “event”, a kindergarten and share his experience there.

  10. Great article. Agree strongly with much of its premise. Thank you to the author.

    • Replies: @Currahee
  11. Trinity says:

    The average male heterosexual would be just as promiscuous as the average queer if straight women had no principles or didn’t have discriminating tastes. A homersexual male has to score with another homersexual male, and face it, except for the rare magical nymphomaniac, most males whether straight or queer will have a stronger sex drive than females.

    The Bolshevik Left aka JEWS are using the homersexuals just like they did Blacks earlier. Divide and conquer AND DESTROY TRADITIONAL WHITE NATIONS. EVERY SINGLE DESTRUCTIVE MOVEMENT CAN BE TRACED TO THE SAME SOURCE.

  12. anon[263] • Disclaimer says:

    I thank the author for this sober, timely, and well-reasoned essay. Policy recommendations are difficult but the facts on the ground must be acknowledged.

  13. Rahan says:

    Aside from anal sex, they engage in fisting, rimming (anus-to-mouth), urolagnia (getting urinated on and drinking urine),

    These are already normalized with many modern women of around 40 and under; plus hair-pulling, choking, slapping, and bondage.

    Tell women they are actually men with vaginas, have them start behave like male homosexuals. Who would have guessed.

  14. Rahan says:

    Whites would be wise to never allow homosexuals positions of influence and power. This doesn’t mean they should be persecuted solely because they are gay, but only that campaigns to normalize and promote homosexuality should be outlawed. Gays who are “closeted” and who keep their sexual proclivities private should be left alone.

    However, the minute gays are given a sympathetic platform and permitted to propagandize among us – especially if they were to target our children – there should be harsh penalties.

    This describes today’s China and Russia. Homosexuality is legal, gay dating apps are legal, but everything should be behind closed doors between consenting adults. Propaganda gets penalties.

  15. anarchyst says:

    As much as homosexuals vehemently deny it, homosexuality and pedophilia are inextricably linked. Almost all homosexuals have had their first homosexual “experience” introduced to them by an ADULT homosexual as pre-teen males. This, in itself constitutes homosexual pedophilia, which is criminal behavior in itself and is a way to destroy a pre-teen child for life.
    The so-called Roman Catholic priest “child abuse scandal” was actually homosexual pedophilia in action. Of course the “mainstream media” could not afford to offend the “homosexual community” by calling what it really was–thereby, the “play on words”, calling it “child sex abuse” rather than homosexual pedophilia–the true definition of their sordid behavior.
    I must play “devil’s advocate” when it comes to the Catholic church homosexual pedophilic priest “problem”…The Catholic church was “caught between a rock and a hard place” and had every right to be concerned about how many false claims would be made by those parishioners who belonged to the parish at the same time as this behavior was going on. Follow the money… Of course, there is (and was) absolutely NO EXCUSE for this homosexual pedophilic behavior…
    Sad to say, the homosexuals are at it again, encouraging the “psychiatric community” to change the definition of pedophilia from a psychiatric “disorder” to a mere “lifestyle”, not unlike what was done for homosexuality. Sick, huh??

  16. The whole system has to come apart completely before it can be rebuilt. In the rebuilding process, you can’t have tolerance or mercy for this group or that group because that same tolerance is what got us into the mess we are in. The best we can do right now is to form strong white communities with support networks where we can protect and educate our own children. There is no half-way point with homosexuality, society either accepts it or shuns it. In healthy societies, its not acceptable and men and women who are attracted to the same sex know what the score is, look but don’t touch. Step out of line and you will suffer the consequences.

    • Replies: @William Gruff
  17. @folkvangr

    Have you actually read the article? or are you making some kind of ironic statement about conservatives as blind reactionaries?

    • Replies: @Franz
  18. @anarchyst

    “the homosexuals are at it again, encouraging the “psychiatric community” to change the definition of pedophilia from a psychiatric “disorder” to a mere “lifestyle”, not unlike what was done for homosexuality. Sick, huh??”
    Sick, indeed.
    And it runs parallel to a horror of adolescence sexuality.
    There are states in the US (Michigan?) where a 16 yr old boy can undergo a criminal process that leaves him with a “sex criminal” tag for the rest of his life.
    Truly the moral compass of the West is spinning out of control.

    • Replies: @animalogic
  19. @animalogic

    Pardon.
    A 16 yr old boy with a 15 yr old girl friend. Everything consenual.

    • Replies: @Reactive Reaction
  20. Judd says:

    well reasoned overall

  21. Bro43rd says:
    @folkvangr

    Touched a nerve, there’s a saying about thou that protest so much.

    • LOL: Trinity, Rich
    • Replies: @folkvangr
  22. Thomasina says:
    @anarchyst

    “Almost all homosexuals have had their first homosexual “experience” introduced to them by an ADULT homosexual as pre-teen males. This, in itself constitutes homosexual pedophilia, which is criminal behavior in itself and is a way to destroy a pre-teen child for life.”

    The gays I’ve known have said that they knew they were attracted to males from a very early age, say 3, 4 or 5 years old. IOW, they knew early on that they were different. That said, NO ONE should ever be touching a child – EVER. Pre-teen? Throw away the key!

    Pedophilia IS a psychiatric disorder. These guys hunt for their victims the same way an antisocial criminal hunts for their victims. And I would argue that homosexuality is a psychiatric disorder too. There does appear to be a genetic component, but from what I’ve observed, something went terribly wrong in early childhood. Either the mother does not allow the child to cross over to the father, or the father for some reason or another appears to reject the child (at least in the child’s mind). Probably wouldn’t have been so prevalent back in the farming culture days, but with today’s busy lifestyle, with parents stressed and caught on the capitalist treadmill, it is easy to imagine how things can get twisted.

    Our culture is pretty sick, and these people are but a reflection of this sickness. Do you agree?

  23. anonymous[180] • Disclaimer says:

    It seems a big part of the issue is that gays function as a praetorian guard for elites against the majority of normies … a natural mafia

    And that they in fact have done this for thousands of years, tho mostly in the guise of being ‘celibate holy men’, the monks and priests of history around the world

    In the West we were saddled for centuries with the Vatican version, covertly gay men in church robes everywhere

    The Christian Orthodox of Russia, Greece etc limited this somewhat, by letting ordinary parish priests marry before ordination … tho for the Orthodox, being a bishop required either being lifelong ‘celibate’ (gay monks often) or having one’s wife dead

    There is no end of harm that was done in the West by the Vatican Church selling this ‘celibate is holy’ fraud whilst the gays who ruled over it laughed … duping many noble-minded straight men into the monastery or priesthood so they never had progeny … snatching worthy mothers out of the role of being mothers of children, into nunneries

    Tho it let its church ministers marry, Protestantism didn’t rescue the situation because the focus on the Jewish Bible book, in time led to the whole Abrahamic ‘eternal torture hell’ religion project being perceived as both unpleasant and a fraud

    Reincarnation Asian religions have much more truth in them … but didn’t avoid the ‘celibate’ gay man scam

  24. folkvangr says:

    This is my 300th post on this website and I am leaving it.

    My heartfelt thanks to every likeminded person who responded to my comments and those who nourished my curiosity and helped me with my struggle to get a grip on complex issues. I guess I have reached a point where I am not satisfied anymore with discussing those issues in the way they are handled here.

    This site is a one-highly-opinionated-and-aggressive-man operation who is using it for advancing someone’s agenda which is so pernicious and evil that everything good that its editor and owner accomplished has been practically nullified. This is why so many brilliant commenters have left this forum.
    Anyway. It’s been a rough journey but I’ve enjoyed it.

    Cheers

  25. anarchyst says:
    @anonymous

    You make a good point…
    It is only the Roman Catholic sect of Catholicism that imposes celibacy on its clergy.
    This is a major “fault” with Roman Catholicism that needs to be corrected.
    Most people (even Catholics) are unaware that celibacy was imposed on Roman Catholic priests for purely financial considerations. In the middle ages, church property was being willed to the descendants of married priests and bishops, rather than remaining in Catholic Church hands. Celibacy was imposed to take the priests’ and bishops’ families out of the equation.
    There is nothing “Protestant” about allowing Roman Catholic priests to marry. In fact, other Catholic sects (Greek Orthodox and Maronite) allow for married priests. Married Episcopal clergy who convert to Catholicism are allowed to function as priests and bring their families into the Catholic faith.
    A compromise could be to allow candidates for the priesthood to be married, but forbid present-day fully laicized priests from advocating marriage.
    The Vatican II Ecumenical Council should have resulted in the call to abolish celibacy. Instead, it was a subversive vehicle to impose Protestant and Jewish principles on the Catholic Church.

  26. anarchyst says:
    @Thomasina

    I think that a large part of homosexuality is promoted by single-parent fatherless homes. This is also true among homosexual females and males who adopt children (which should never be allowed).
    A normal two-parent male-female family situation is the only solution.
    “Grooming” of pre-pubescent and post-pubescent children is becoming more common as the homosexual, pedophilia, and LGBTQXYZ is becoming “normalized” by (((you know who))). In most cases, once homosexuals “groom” a vulnerable young male whose sexual mores have not been fully set, there is no turning back. For those who wish to leave the homosexual “lifestyle”, there are few resources as homosexual groups have pushed for the banning and criminalization of “conversion therapy” groups whose aim is to promote “homosexual” deprogramming for those who wish to revert to heterosexuality.
    We are indeed living in perilous times, especially for our children.

    • Replies: @Thomasina
    , @anon
  27. Either way, there is little sense in denying what both history and reality itself reveals – namely, that large numbers of homosexuals prefer to have sexual relations with young boys.

    Why it would be so? Why would gays prefer young boys (who often are not gay) to other adult gay men? I wondered about it sometimes myself, but are you suggesting it is a form of “recruitment”…?

    That would be a wrong strategy, as homosexuality indeed seems to be genetic, and transferred by a certain subset of X chromosomes: high rates of homosexuality are observed in communities that practice cousin marriages (like Pakistan), from the point of view of genetics a marriage which by its nature conserves X chromosomes (which recombines, unlike Y chromosome, so you must marry cousins if you want to preserve it).

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hijra_(South_Asia)

    or in Europe:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Femminiello

  28. @Another Polish Perspective

    Of course, if you marry two unrelated “gay families”, you will likely get some gay offspring too. However, since gays are said to comprise only 4-10% of society, in the long run you need either cousin marriages or marriages only among “gay” families to sustain them since their X-chromosome based genes need “reinforcement”.

    I read that in USA one of the groups with the highest levels of cousin marriages are Amish, and voila..!

    https://www.lgbtamish.com/

    • Replies: @jinkforp
  29. @anarchyst

    The Vatican II Ecumenical Council should have resulted in the call to abolish celibacy.

    Indeed. Interesting, isn’t it, that they were willing to change literally everything under consideration, doctrines, liturgy, canon law, saints, etc., but not celibacy, divorce, or birth control.

    So why did Paul VI overrule his expert advisors on this one area? He was a disciple of Jacques Maritain, and surrounded by Maritain’s devotees. This was a circle of closeted French homosexuals who promoted a “holier than thou” notion of being too spiritual for nasty reproductive sex, and used “traditional family values” as a means of punishing heterosexuals by making their sexual lives as onerous as possible (no sex outside marriage, sex in marriage only for reproduction, no divorce under any circumstances, no birth control).

    “Traditional family values” were designed by a group of bitter old queens as a smokescreen for their international pedophile ring. Hiding in plain sight: “He’s not gay, he’s a holy priest. He’ll be an excellent babysitter, since he’s not interested in sex at all; in fact, he’s a more reliable moral teacher than Bobby’s parents anyway.”

    “Trad Queen Story Hour: Part I: Papa Francesco vs. Steve Bannon’s Army of Cath-Boys”
    https://counter-currents.com/2020/06/papa-francesco-vs-steve-bannon/

    • Replies: @JR Foley
  30. Thomasina says:
    @anarchyst

    “I think that a large part of homosexuality is promoted by single-parent fatherless homes. This is also true among homosexual females and males who adopt children (which should never be allowed).”

    No doubt this goes a long way toward causing the problem, as I believe the homosexual is essentially still searching for the male bonding they never got.

    “A normal two-parent male-female family situation is the only solution.”

    Yes, but that word “normal” is very hard to achieve. Witness the numbers of parents with personality disorders who are raising children (narcissists, as an example).

    “In most cases, once homosexuals “groom” a vulnerable young male whose sexual mores have not been fully set, there is no turning back.”

    No “young” person should ever be groomed, period. That said, I don’t think this turns someone into a homosexual. That happened in the child’s very first years of life.

    As for conversion therapy, I can’t see this working. Pretend a person is a vase someone is molding. The process goes on until the vase takes shape. It is then hardened and fired. Try turning that into a paper cup now. Can’t be done. We are all a product of our genetics and environment, unfortunately.

    I once had a pedophile get me into his car, unwillingly. I was ten or eleven, just starting to develop. Terror! I remember my fingers being pried from the chain link fence I was desperately trying to hold onto. In hindsight, this guy was delusional and living in a fantasy world, just by what he said to me. I managed a narrow escape, but the escape was as harrowing as the capture. These people are sick.

    Do you not think our culture is causing this? Whether a two-parent male-female family or not, things are getting twisted. There is great stress on the family unit. Do you agree?

    • Replies: @anarchyst
  31. jinkforp says:
    @Another Polish Perspective

    No way are homos 4-10% of society. West Hollywood, the fag capital of Southern California, is 15%. San Francisco is 20%. Were homosexuality so common as you claim, every town with any pretense of sophistication would be 15-20% homo.

    The Kinsey report of the late 1940’s, where the 10% figure came from, was demonstrated to be a deliberate lie in the 1980’s when European AIDS researchers could not replicate it.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  32. anarchyst says:
    @Another Polish Perspective

    Your question:

    Why would gays prefer young boys (who often are not gay) to other adult gay men? I wondered about it sometimes myself, but are you suggesting it is a form of “recruitment”…?

    …deserves an honest answer.

    Homosexuals DO attempt to “recruit” young pre-pubescent boys into the “lifestyle”. I don’t believe that homosexuality is genetic in nature but rather, a predisposition which can be fueled by external sources.

    It could be similar to alcoholism which is a predisposition that becomes problematic if it is negatively acted upon.

    Children of alcoholics learn one of two things: #1. to drink to excess and to develop into an alcoholic, or: #2. not to drink at all and avoid the “scourge” of alcoholism.

    I believe that it is somewhat similar to homosexual recruitment, that if one succumbs to the adult homosexual, it does tend to turn out badly.
    Quite often, the adult homosexual will “bribe” the young “recruit” with “gifts”, as well as alcohol and other drugs. If the “recruit” has a difficult home life, it becomes easier for the homosexual recruitment to take hold as the adult homosexual will offer “attention” that the “recruit” is not getting at home.
    If I had my way, ANY recruitment (grooming) of a non-adult by an adult homosexual or other LGBTQXYZ type would result in a mandatory life sentence for the “recruiter” (groomer).

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  33. FKA Max says: • Website
    @anon

    he must understand that his homosexuality is a genetic/biological defect

    I haven’t done very extensive research on this topic, but there’s is quite compelling evidence that male homosexuality is a byproduct of a highly adaptive reproductive strategy and that’s why the genes associated with it have remained stably in populations/gene pools:

    Studies have observed that the maternal aunts and grandmothers of homosexual probands were significantly more fecund compared with the maternal aunts and maternal grandmothers of the heterosexual probands, which explains the low universal frequency but stability of the distribution of homosexuals, and thus compensating for the reduced fecundity of homosexuals. These data support an X-linked multi-locus sexually antagonistic hypothesis.

    https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0051088 or https://archive.ph/uAyGq

    Tolerance of homosexuality is also associated with stronger economic growth, which could be interpreted as another competitive and probably even evolutionary advantage:

    A study found that an additional point on the 8-point Global Index on Legal Recognition of Homosexual Orientation scale of legal rights for homosexual persons is associated with an increase in real GDP per capita of approximately $2000.

    https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305750X19300695 or https://archive.ph/fuD0K

    I have hypothesized in the past https://www.unz.com/isteve/and-then-they-came-for-opera-conductor-james-levine/?showcomments#comment-2103122 that open and socially-accepted male homosexuality would reduced male mating competition — lesbians are far more problematic in this regard https://www.unz.com/isteve/and-then-they-came-for-opera-conductor-james-levine/?showcomments#comment-2103479 — which would make a society more peaceful and presumably also more productive, etc.:

    Men die at higher rates than women across the lifespan. A new study suggests that this excess mortality is the price of reproductive competition
    https://phys.org/news/2010-05-men-dying-sex-competition-excess.html or https://archive.ph/ZJVdB

    In the current study, Kruger shows that two factors related to the level of male reproductive competition contribute to higher rates of risk-taking and mortality.

    The first factor is polygyny, the social situation in which one man maintains sexual relations with many women. Several species of primates show high levels of polygyny, where one dominant male mates with most of the females in the group, and other males are left out. Human cultures have varying degrees of polygyny, and Kruger found that the more prevalent the practice, the higher the rate of male mortality.
    […]
    The second factor: the degree of economic inequality. In mate selection, men are valued for the resource investment that they can provide, bringing benefits to their offspring. The wider the gap between rich and poor, the more likely men are to die young. In less egalitarian societies, a man with what scientists call “resource control”—money, property and economic security—is more likely to find sexual partners.

    Also, whites are the least gay ethnicity according to some surveys even though they are the most accepting/tolerant of that sexual orientation, so a white ethno state or a super-majority white, minority-Jewish/Hispanic/Black/Asian society (80+% white population) would probably have much fewer societal problems with dysfunctional/degenerate homosexuality than a multi-cultural or non-white state/society:Image Source: https://news.gallup.com/poll/158066/special-report-adults-identify-lgbt.aspx or https://archive.ph/OJ4KJ

  34. @FKA Max

    Studies have observed that the maternal aunts and grandmothers of homosexual probands were significantly more fecund

    Yeah, yeah, it always comes to elevating the maternal side which transfers homosexuality… A desired outcome, I would say.

    Strangely, the few homosexuals I know are single children of their mothers (if not always of their fathers). Which leads me to suspicion that this study was skewed in some way, especially as it came to the outcome which is clearly evolutionary improbable, namely that maternal side acquired some additional fecundity whereas paternal did not. The proposition is “There exists additional fecundity on the maternal side which is somehow used to produce homosexuals. [UNPROVEN, STRANGE CONNECTION] By automatically asserting that “high fecundity” is evolutionary useful, we thus obtain that homosexuality is evolutionary useful too even if we don’t yet know the nature of this usefulness” [IN OTHER WORDS, WE BLINDLY TRANSFER THE LABEL OF “USEFULNESS” FROM FECUNDITY TO HOMOSEXUALITY: UNPROVEN]

    Where did subjects of the study come from ? All from upper class…? Why were subject not controlled for endogamy ? Why subjects were not controlled for the cousin marriage in their family…? (popular in Italy and Spain – two test countries – up to WWI, judging from the number of papal dispensas given – tens of thousands per year). Why subjects were not controlled for presence of genetic diseases in their families…? Why subjects were not controlled for the number of deaths in their families…? It is for example known that in the Near East or Pakistan cousin marriages are usually more ‘fecund” than non-cousin marriages, but it necessity as they have higher probability of their children dying or being seriously ill.

    • Replies: @FKA Max
  35. FKA Max says: • Website
    @Another Polish Perspective

    There exists additional fecundity on the maternal side which is somehow used to produce homosexuals. [UNPROVEN, STRANGE CONNECTION]

    I have no personal, anecdotal experience in my family with male homosexuals, but I have one only-child, lesbian maternal cousin and another lesbian in my extended family. The fathers of both of these lesbian women were serial adulterers (presumably, instinctively trying to maximize their male fecundity/reproductive fitness), and therefore these men were likely what one could call “hypersexual.” I think the same can be probably said/suspected of the maternal aunts and grandmothers of male homosexuals, and that this/their “hypersexuality” or being a (male or female) nymphomaniac (being compulsively/instinctively sexual) is probably the path and the behavioral trait of how this “highly adaptive reproductive strategy” expressed itself.

    I wasn’t “automatically asserting that “high fecundity” is evolutionary useful”, that’s why I phrased it differently, e.g. “highly adaptive reproductive strategy”, but I think that since this reproductive strategy appears to be rather successful and Nature/Evolution isn’t particularly politically, religiously or ideologically correct, the burden of proof should be on you to show/prove that it isn’t “evolutionary useful.”

  36. whiteboy says:

    Look, I know for a fact that homosexuality is nurture because of a very emotionally unavailable father and a more dominating/overcompensating mother. That’s how my parents were and how many are in the scientific literature.

    The only way to heal from homosexuality is to transcend the shame energy that created it. You have to elevate oneself above it through gratitude and self love. Basically, it’s a condition that traps the (male) in a state of lower consciousness and hyper sexualization around their identity. It’s kind of like a state of hell to be honest…..these are the feminine gays u see.. I don’t think they try to “recruit” they just look to find people to have sex with since it’s always on their mind tbh…..

    I also know that there are other men who were molested as very young boys. These are the ones who turn into pedophiles and who do try to recruit to some degree.

    Basically…. it’s all about childhood trauma. The only way to heal is to allow the shameful energy to be there and transcend it. It’s about elevating above it not dwelling in it. Humanity suffers because no one has been taught how raise themselves past their traumas. If you Scoff at this then you’re part of the problem too.

    Christ showed that prayer, water fasting and giving thanks way the way. He wasn’t wrong… The happier I become and more connected to myself I feel.. the homosexuality dissipates in proportion to my level of happiness/joy… Gratitude is the way out of the illusion that we are separate and out of the hell which is the human ego in its fallen state….. I’m grateful for you guys…. and I’ll be practicing gratitude persistently until I achieve my liberation…

  37. RestiveUs says:
    @anarchyst

    Makes it seem pointless to group it by religious affiliation at all.

  38. RestiveUs says:
    @Thomasina

    The gays I’ve known have said that they knew they were attracted to males from a very early age, say 3, 4 or 5 years old. IOW, they knew early on that they were different.

    How can a 3, 4, or 5 year old have any notion of sexual attraction? I sure don’t remember any at that age. Girls had “cooties” and the only things attractive about other boys were the cool toys they had that I didn’t!

    • Agree: SteveK9
    • Replies: @Thomasina
  39. anon[122] • Disclaimer says:
    @anarchyst

    It is only the Roman Catholic sect of Catholicism that imposes celibacy on its clergy.

    If you’re talking solely about Abrahamic religions, this is probably true. But there are many other religions that involve celibacy for their clergy, e.g. in Hinduism it is common

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sannyasa

    • Thanks: anarchyst
  40. @FKA Max

    “so a white ethno state or a super-majority white, minority-Jewish/Hispanic/Black/Asian society (80+% white population) would probably have much fewer societal problems”

    Not possible. An 80%+ white ethno-state will regress to a 40%-or-less white state in the space of only 3 or 4 generations. Non-white men will always aggressively chase after White women, black men will not only very aggressively court them but will also rape and kill them, Hispanics will outbreed Whites, and Jews and Asians will relentlessly seek financial, political and cultural power plus special privileges, and then use it to subvert, betray, impoverish, and scheme against Whites and lobby for ever-more non-White immigration. All these forces will greatly lower White family formation and the White fertility rate, and shazam! Orania is gone in the blink of an eye.

    Hell, you’ve been watching the process I just described unspool in real time since at least 1965.

    Does anyone ever learn *anything*?

    • Replies: @FKA Max
    , @Anon
  41. @Anon

    Been under a rock lately? The power and authority you refer to, for example the Biden Administration, promotes and encourages the destruction of traditional American values.

  42. Thomasina says:
    @RestiveUs

    Yes, using the words “sexual attraction” was a poor choice of words. I can only go by what the gays I know have said, in hindsight, and they have reported feeling very different from an early age. One I know very well did NOT think girls had “cooties”, loved being around girls, and was never interested in the “cool toys” that boys had. Maybe that was your experience, but that was not what I witnessed.

    I’ve also listened to the experts on this and, if I understood them correctly, they said that children do form their preferences at a very early age. THEY might not know it yet, but it is there. They also said that young children are a lot more sexual than people realize.

    I guess the jury is still out re nature versus nurture. I believe it’s a bit of both. Just my opinion.

    • Replies: @RestiveUs
  43. KenH says:

    Homosexuals definitely have different mental processes. Hollywood sitcoms and TV shows depict homosexuals witty, funny and all around good people but my experience has been much different. In general they tend be moody, catty, a little devious and argumentative.

    I’ve always been baffled as to why some males become homosexual. Are homosexuals born that way or is it a result of childhood sexual trauma or pro-homo propaganda? That question always generates heated debate.

    It is very possible that enduring a same sex molestation or sexual assault at a younger age messes up the wiring in the brain. This plays in to the theory that a person’s first sexual experience tends to be their preference for life. The late popular columnist Charley Reese once discussed this in one of his articles.

    Whether it’s lesbians or gay men when there’s a love spat they often physically injure each other sometimes very seriously. A cop I once knew told be about getting called to the scene of a lesbian love spat and seeing clumps of scalp hair, blood and faces clawed up like each was attacked by a wild animal. The sad thing was that according to him these women were feminine looking and somewhat attractive.

    In a book titled What Cops Know about things Chicago P.D. officers have seen in their careers, one recounted a case where two male homosexual lovers broke up and one got so angry that he stabbed the other to death then shoved a microphone up his rectum. Another recounted getting called to a gold coast condo where two lesbians were viciously beating the hell out of each other.

    As an aside I’ve never gotten along with lesbians too well and the lesbian couples I’ve been acquainted with don’t seem happy at all. Domestic violence is also a bigger problem in the homo community but jewsmedia never reports this.

    Contrary to all the pro-homo propaganda and images of unity lesbians and gay men tend to despise each other. The homosexual lifestyle is a one way ticket to hell, frankly.

    • Replies: @Anon
  44. RestiveUs says:
    @Thomasina

    I’m sure there is an inborn element to it. My wife’s family has several gay/lesbian members and they were from traditional nuclear families. Something I heard ages ago that gave me pause was when, in response to the contention that being gay was a choice, someone asked “when did you ‘decide’ to be straight?”

    • Replies: @Mario Partisan
  45. Tony says:

    The author needs to come to terms with his own homosexuality.

    • Replies: @SBaker
  46. I suspect, Homosexuality is trauma induced!

  47. Everyone is afraid to criticize Homosexuality, for fear of being suspected of being a religious Fundamentalist.

    • LOL: Bro43rd
  48. @FKA Max

    I think that since this reproductive strategy appears to be rather successful

    It will be natural only if not an outcome of endogamy or cousin marriages which is mating for genetic “purity”. In purely stochastic mating, any minority of 4% should disappear long time ago. Moreover, the fact that homosexual share in society DID NOT INCREASE questions the thesis that homosexuality is evolutionary useful.

    In case of humans, hypersexuality/fecundity does not seem to particularity useful, since you need a lot of resources to take care of many children up to their adulthood. Realistically, hypersexuality would only produce a more children than standard sexuality in society without marriage and without contraception. It is well known, anyway, that whores do not have many children.

    Otherwise, the practice of rich homosexual who recently seem to prefer getting offspring through surogates would rather question high fecundity of their own families, as well as the theory of “gay uncle” who was to provide additional resources for children of his sisters (and thus to prove why homosexuality is evolutionary useful).

    • Replies: @FKA Max
  49. @animalogic

    When I was 16 (and 17, and 18) the law in New York was “Fifteen (year old girl) will get you twenty (years)”, and that law was enforced.

  50. Homosexual activity is not an illness, not a different way of being. It is a sin. Homosexuality is self-worship.

  51. FKA Max says: • Website
    @Another Polish Perspective

    All fair points.

    But you have not refuted/disproven my point about the, in my opinion, societally beneficial reduction in intra-male mating competition when/if open homosexuality is accepted/tolerated to a certain healthy degree within a society/country, that will likely make that society — as I posited — less internally violent, and thus more productive, possibly more creative and innovative, etc., and therefore richer, and presumably more evolutionarily fit and dominant.
    Imagine, for example, if Greg Johnson https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greg_Johnson_(white_nationalist) — who is purported to be a homosexualist — were heterosexual or were forced to hide his homosexuality and be forced to have a wife and kids, then he would surely be a “catch” for most women, since he is tall, intelligent, relatively handsome, cultured, etc. “Normie” males would have a hard time competing with him for wives/mates, which would make them in turn probably more frustrated, resentful, less cooperative, etc. The dynamic I’m describing is jokingly, but I think accurately, illustrated in the following video. Forcing especially male homosexuals to be “closeted” has all kinds of side effects that are not “evolutionary useful”, IMHO:
    Gay Men Will Marry Your Girlfriends

  52. anarchyst says:
    @Thomasina

    Woman Raised By Lesbians Has Some Shocking Things To Say About Needing A Dad

    Experience is supposed to be top card over any and all facts. But what happens when experience blows holes in the activist narrative?

    It doesn’t matter who you click with. That was what the airline put in their ads.

    Homosexuals should be able to raise children. We’ve been told this for as long as same-sex relationships have been socially acceptable.

    But did anybody ask what the CHILDREN thought about it?

    One has finally spoken up. The keepers of the narrative will not like it.

    We can probably expect her to be given the same rough treatment that other heretics against the cause, like Milo, are given.

    So, while she still has a voice, let’s let hers be heard:

    It’s her own personal story, after all. By the rules of the game as the Left has been playing it, who can judge her for her own story?

    [Heather] Barwick, who is 31 now, married, and has four children, said that same-sex marriage and parenting withholds either a mother or father from a child while telling him or her that it doesn’t matter. That it’s all the same. But it’s not.

    “A lot of us, a lot of your kids, are hurting,” wrote Barwick in her essay for The Federalist website. “My father’s absence created a huge hole in me, and I ached every day for a dad. I loved my mom’s partner, but another mom could never have replaced the father I lost.”

    “I grew up surrounded by women who said they didn’t need or want a man,” said Barwick. “Yet, as a little girl, I so desperately wanted a daddy. It is a strange and confusing thing to walk around with this deep-down unquenchable ache for a father, for a man, in a community that says that men are unnecessary.”

    She used to be an advocate of same-sex marriage. So she isn’t motivated by disdain for same-sex relationships. She’s backing a different cause now.

    “Gay marriage doesn’t just redefine marriage, but also parenting,” she says. “It promotes and normalizes a family structure that necessarily denies us something precious and foundational. It denies us something we need and long for, while at the same time tells us that we don’t need what we naturally crave. That we will be okay. But we’re not. We’re hurting.”

    “It’s not just me,” said Barwick. “There are so many of us. Many of us are too scared to speak up and tell you about our hurt and pain, because for whatever reason it feels like you’re not listening. That you don’t want to hear.”

    “If we say we are hurting because we were raised by same-sex parents, we are either ignored or labeled a hater,” she wrote.
    Source: Daily Mail

    Now she’s an advocate of Children’s rights. She’s also married and a mother of four.

    Buckle up, Heather. It looks like you’ll be in for a rough ride.

    • Replies: @mulga mumblebrain
  53. @FKA Max

    “societally beneficial reduction in intra-male mating competition when/if open homosexuality is accepted/tolerated to a certain healthy degree within a society/country, that will likely make that society — as I posited — less internally violent, and thus more productive, possibly more creative and innovative, etc., and therefore richer, and presumably more evolutionarily fit and dominant.”

    Under the conditions that gays stay with their own “birds of feathers”, yes, such a society could be perhaps more peaceful…. but why more creative and innovative? We should not mistake aptitude for hairdressing for socially useful creativity… Gay scientists (at least in hard science) happen but are rare… one could also try to refute your argument by claim that the proposed situation would introduce an increased intra-gay competition among gays, so gay scientists couldn’t concentrate on science anymore and there would be no surplus productivity…

    Whatever the final outcome in terms of societal peace, this is a strategy for a couple of generations, since in such a situation the total number of gays should of course decrease! As such, such a strategy cannot be called “evolutionary”. It is, of course, the double life of gays, enforced by culture, which has preserved their numbers until now: if anything, it is mimicry that is the real evolutionary strategy of gays.

    I only wonder which gay would like to make himself willingly unhappy, marrying a woman…? And aren’t women able to recognize a gay man and not to marry him as such if there is no societal/familial pressure…? (yes, I know, some will hope “to convert” a gay but not all).

    Interestingly, I have recently seen a movie, “Yuni”, where a girl immediately lost sympathy for a man as a potential husband when she recognized him as gay:

    https://www.imdb.com/title/tt13834788/?ref_=nv_sr_srsg_0

  54. @anon

    Homosexuality is NOT biological defect. It is a SYMPTOM of a much deeper spiritual and psychological problems that the homosexual themselves understand. That’s why and how they figured out grooming little boys etc. They KNOW how to MAKE homosexuals. So they KNOW why.

    • Agree: anarchyst, Rich
    • Replies: @mulga mumblebrain
  55. FKA Max says: • Website
    @The Germ Theory of Disease

    Not possible. An 80%+ white ethno-state will regress to a 40%-or-less white state in the space of only 3 or 4 generations.

    I don’t necessarily think this is or must be the case. The “Lower 48” and the U.S. in general is a very unique piece of territory and polity in this regard since it covers so many degrees of latitude; from the 25th parallel north around Miami to roughly the 49th parallel north around Seattle.

    Usually areas — with the exception of densely-populated big metropolis like NYC, Chicago, etc. — above the 40th parallel north https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/40th_parallel_north maintain their white majority populations pretty well and consistently, despite massive non-White immigration into the U.S. over the last 50+ years.

    Non-whites simply don’t like and usually can’t handle colder temperatures and long, dark winter months very well, due to their darkly-pigmented skin and eyes which can’t produce sufficient amounts of Vitamin D https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vitamin_D#Skin_pigmentation and Dopamine https://archive.ph/Cy2ZT#selection-1007.0-1007.314 in order not to become depressed, lethargic, etc., so most non-Whites voluntarily avoid areas father away from the equator.

    Climate and seasonality acts as a natural barrier that creates de facto “ethno states.”
    This phenomenon can be observed quite well looking at maps (Click [MORE] button) of the “American Community Survey”:

  56. @FKA Max

    Well, here comes a confirmation of the thesis that excessive cousin marriage will produce homosexuals from the mouth of a lion itself… the ancient Greece known for its homo-friendliness was in its past the area of the very strictly followed cousin marriages.

    “However, another finding was completely unexpected: on Crete and the other Greek islands, as well as on the mainland, it was very common to marry one’s first cousin 4,000 years ago.
    “More than a thousand ancient genomes from different regions of the world have now been published, but it seems that such a strict system of kin marriage did not exist anywhere else in the ancient world,” says Eirini Skourtanioti, the lead author of the study who conducted the analyses. “This came as a complete surprise to all of us and raises many questions.”

    https://www.sott.net/article/476337-Marriage-rules-in-Minoan-Crete-revealed-by-ancient-DNA-analysis

    • Replies: @FKA Max
  57. FKA Max says: • Website
    @Another Polish Perspective

    Excessive cousin marriage also produces schizophrenics/terrorists. Not a fan. Cousin marriage amplifies whatever trait is already in the gene pool and was previously selected for, it doesn’t cause the trait itself (For detailed discussion click [MORE] button):

    [MORE]

    “I am *not* an expert at all in this field, but how I understand this scenario to be possible is for carriers of homozygous, recessive genes (even deleterious ones) to just have [many] more children than anybody else in the population, i.e. polygamy, harems, etc. It probably boils down to money and power again. A forced and misguided, not voluntary and enlightened, selection for deleterious traits/genes so to speak, due to the high socio-economic and political status of the carrier of these deleterious alleles.” – https://www.unz.com/gnxp/middle-eastern-populations-have-higher-recessive-disease-load/?showcomments#comment-1515641

    “How do you explain the high prevalence of MAOA-2R in the Saudi population? Did Saudis select for the ”warrior gene” in the past, and now, through their cousin marriage tradition/custom, these traits are widespread in the population?” – https://www.unz.com/gnxp/open-thread-732016/?showcomments#comment-1484306

    Studies have revealed that consanguinity/cousin marriage is an important risk factor for schizophrenia.” – https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3721918/ or https://archive.ph/dT3YT

    There are only three disorders that have a substantially higher prevalence in the lone-actor population (see Figure 2), the most noteworthy being schizophrenia. Schizophrenia has long been accepted as having a prevalence of 1 percent (upper end) in general populations, and has a contentious link to violent behavior.” – https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/1057610X.2015.1120099 or https://archive.ph/aHuI6

    The MAOA 2R allele that has a link to extreme violence has an occurrence of about 15.6% in some Arab populations, as opposed to .1% to .5% in Europeans: https://archive.ph/xowuI#selection-851.1-851.536

    Association study between the dopamine-related candidate gene polymorphisms and ADHD among Saudi Arabia population via PCR technique
    https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Count-and-allele-frequencies-for-MOA-A-in-ADHD-and-control-group-100_tbl1_232280816 or https://archive.ph/lqZ3c
    Count and allele frequencies for MOA-A in ADHD and control group (100 %)

    • Replies: @FKA Max
  58. FKA Max says: • Website
    @FKA Max

    Ancient Athens/Greece probably intentionally selected for traits that were associated with homosexuality, and those traits were most easily and longest preserved in areas that practice(d) “excessive cousin marriage” and/or endogamy like more isolated island populations:

    Other scholars, such as Victoria Wohl [de], emphasize that in Athens, same-sex desire was part of the “sexual ideology of the democracy,” shared by the elite and the demos, as exemplified by the tyrant-slayers, Harmodius and Aristogeiton.[40] Even those who argue that pederasty was limited to the upper classes generally concede that it was “part of the social structure of the polis“.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homosexuality_in_ancient_Greece#Scholarship_and_controversy

  59. @anarchyst

    This [i.e., priestly celibacy] is a major “fault” with Roman Catholicism that needs to be corrected.

    With respect, I am very surprised that you hold this opinion. Nor do I think that your direct link of mandated clerical celibacy to “financial considerations” is at all sound. This document is one of a very great many that lay out the history of the discipline in some considerable detail.

    Although it is true that the universal requirement for clerical celibacy dates only from the twelfth century (Second Lateran Council, 1139), the virtually universal acceptance of the desirability of clerical celibacy can be traced to the Patristic era, and it is by no means unreasonable to suppose that it was more likely the norm than the exception even in the second century AD.

    The plain-as-day evidence of the extent to which contemporary life has, in every respect, become disgustingly and degenerately sexualized should, if anything, bolster what I consider the inescapable conclusion that it would be daylight madness for the Church—Traditionalists first and foremost—to abandon or dilute any further the requirement of celibacy for anyone in Holy Orders. Pope Benedict XV wrote in 1920 that celibacy was of such importance that the Church could never abolish it. I second his authoritative opinion without reservation, and I pray that the Holy Ghost will act in any manner necessary to prevent this critically important discipline’s controversion.

  60. You mention rimming but I’d like to point that it has become very popular in the hetero community. I see posts after posts on rimming(a guy on askreddit mentioned he wanted the woman to defecate on him(she a hooker) and she did and he’s been miserable ever since), mostly guys wanting it from women. It is very popular.

    I agree about gay men and it is obvious they have a huge sex drive. Men on average have a bigger sex drive. Add in the prohibited and amoral aspect and it becomes an even bigger temptation. I wasn’t pro gay but then neither was I ever anti it. I studied Scriptwriting in Canada and worked on sets and could make out who was a fag. The thing is, because they are repressed, and always have been since hitting puberty there is a lot of pent up anger and frustration. This is human nature at play…..kinda like how many women are passive agressive.

    I am watching a critically acclaimed show called White Lotus, getting awards left and right. It’s showrunner is gay and the show is littered with sex scenes with men. The opening episode has Steve Zahn holding his erect penis(prosthetic but still) checking for some cancer. It took me by shock how blatant it was. This is just wrong. Then theres a scene with an older guy rimming a standing younger male, they both getting caught.
    All this is their pent up frustration. Doesnt matter they’re talented(the show is good actually), there’s always that pent up hatred to “give back”.

    Another show about old Hollywood which fascinated me because I like the production side of things, is all about gay sex with each episode ending with some sex act. I’ve even forgotten the name of the show…..the show runner again is gay. These are shows on Netflix and streaming that any 10 year old will see. This is where things are headed.

    I had no issues with gays. If they did what they do behind closed doors, didn’t mention their sexuality to the world wanting praise and pity, stopped wasting our money on their prides I’d have no issues. But they cannot be that way.

  61. – especially if they were to target our children –

    Got a really bad and astonishingly heinous story for you on that note. I hope these guys get thrown in the river gagged and wearing cement shoes.
    https://townhall.com/tipsheet/miacathell/2023/01/17/zulock-case-pt-1-n2618219

  62. @Reverend Goody

    Seems the closeted gay reader got triggered by too much reality. Funny how that works..

    • LOL: Bardon Kaldian
    • Replies: @Bro43rd
  63. something I witnessed at times. Other employees and I would often find them in an alley engaged in sex next to a dumpster that we used daily.

    oh man you know that dumpster too? i was in hollywood driving down the road on halloween. i cut into a dark alley to get by the side streets. i was on my way to having a cool straight night. i look out the car window and there behind a business, in a tiny dark parking lot, next to a dimly lit dumpster- i saw 3, maybe 4 men, cackling and copulating like animals. one was a scantily dressed cowboy in boots, and as i looked away i saw one was on his knees eating the other guys ass. the others were standing by and holding on. they really couldn’t take it behind the dumpster. absolute fecal fiends. weho is like one big fags-r-us toy shop for them. just obscene and perverse. (this country has decency laws god damnit!)

  64. The Gay movement basically hijacked the Black civil rights movement and made it their own. Feminist then copied the Gays and moved to the front of the victimhood line.

  65. Franz says:
    @al gore rhythms

    Have you actually read the article?

    I guess people who don’t read the article don’t read the comments either.

    • LOL: al gore rhythms
  66. JR Foley says:
    @James J. O'Meara

    Paul states —“bishop should be married” of all things but if a religious remain celibate–so much the better.

  67. JR Foley says:

    “Moreover, the anus is not meant for sex. It is meant to extract waste and is riddled with bacteria and germs. A good many of the STD’s that infect gay men are the direct result of playing around where they shouldn’t. ” As if this is ntn nauseating enough—some will now ingest the rod and lick it clean.
    All filthy and contrary to nature.

  68. wanting to stick your dick in something / get a dick stuck in you doesn’t make you “good”.

  69. On one occasion I walked over to Arthur J’s to pick up the lunches we had ordered. When I entered the restaurant, the place was filled with gay men as they gawked at me and made lewd comments. This was in the mid-1970s where many of them wore leather vests and huge mustaches — something right out of The Village People. It was so creepy and uncomfortable that when I returned to the office, I told my father that I would never go there again.

    In my opinion that’s mostly the correct approach. Ideally this author ought to have also told the owner of the store his views on the crappy atmosphere – and also everybody else when the opportunity arose.

    This author has written he is a former policeman. I wonder if he doesn’t pine for the Good Old Days when Heroes In Blue could and did beat homosexuals till their arms got tired.

    A few years back I listened to two very old small-town Indiana Deputies comparing notes about those Good Old Days when they abused the hell out of anybody they didn’t like.

    Finally, can’t help but notice there was no mention here of Prison Rape. Where does this author stand on allowing – if not encouraging – the sexual abuse of prisoners by large rapists or gangs of smaller ones?

    Is that a special case where turning a blind eye is OK? If not, how about a very long essay concentrating on Prison Reform?

  70. @folkvangr

    All the best in your new ad/ventures. Yes, this site is rapidly deteriorating in areas of objectivity, truth, human empathy and cultural values of higher orders.

    The fact that a frequent poster, who calls himself Rockabotus, happens to be a hater, who quite possibly has deeply repressed bisexual proclivities and happened to grow up in the hyper-urban miasma which is the City of Lost Angels where he was exposed to every known form of weirdness, such as the many same-sexers who fled to LaLaLand from small towns dominated by churchaholic retards of the missionary-position tradition.

    Many of those gay refugees never recovered from the insanity which is Bible-Belt literalism in the traditions of the deracinated masses such as those who joined up with the “Reverend” John Hagee, the father of the totally oxymoronic sect known as “Christian” Zionism.

    Can you even pretend to begin to imagine what it is like for a non- normie gay boy to be born in this particular lifetime into a disturbed patriarchal family which had devolved into becoming “Christian” Zionists to the point of contributing thousands to I$rael and awaiting the Rupture, when they would suddenly be stripped nude (if the males had not undergone sexual mutilation at the ripe old age of 23 hours)…or stark raging naked if they had suffered the unkindest cut, making them honorary Jews..

    ……then to be magically wafted up into Jesus’ spaceship and quickly borne to this huge white city, to be met by St. Peter at the gate with a list far longer than his peter and if found forgiven of his multitudinous sins, to be ushered by winged angels into a city with streets of gold and filled with people in white robes strumming happily on harps.

    Yes, it’s quite the journey experiencing a particular lifetime within a culture which is corrupted from the top down, with every major institution dominated by psychopathic sociopaths and assorted materialists larded with greed, envy, hubris and exclusivism PLUS a thirst for power over other individuals.

    But we do happen to be spiritual beings living a material lifetime on what has clearly devolved into a prison planet. So there is reason for hope for an awakening from this miasmatic nightmare…a mass awakening where even cultural deviants such as Wakkyabotus are able to recover from their insanity-inducing megalopolitan miasmas to emerge once again into their innate, but currently culturally overburdened humanity.

    By featuring Rocky-Boat-Us on this site, Ron Unz may be trending and tottering into a much earlier form of the state into which “The Big Guy” has fallen. Sometimes an individual’s accumulated karma within this lifetime becomes writ large for all to see…and to consider.

    By featuring this lying, hyperbolizing individual, Unz is catering to the insanity of the various knuckle draggers who have infested this site for years and who now, as reasonable and humane individuals are migrating elsewhere; are beginning to dominate a once wonderful refuge from the madness of “Murrikkka”.

    • Agree: Vito Klein
    • Replies: @Jimmy Way
  71. Thomm says:

    Regarding most ‘White Nationalists’ on this website, if you pose a simple polite question to them, about whether they would rather have sex with a white man or the prettiest black woman in the world, virtually none of them give the standard heterosexual answer. They either prefer the man, or go to great lengths to try and change the subject. Try it out and see.

    Greg Johnson has long said that White Nationalism should have nothing to do with heterosexuality. It seems he has gotten his wish.

    • Replies: @Bardon Kaldian
  72. Anon[201] • Disclaimer says:
    @The Germ Theory of Disease

    Non-white men will always aggressively chase after White women

    Not so.

    Men will always aggressively pursue Asian, mixed race and Latina women. White women aren’t popular with the opposite sex.

    https://qph.cf2.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-569898b7153394ecdb7c0d256b41f41b-lq

    Jews and Asians will relentlessly seek financial, political and cultural power plus special privileges, and then use it to subvert, betray, impoverish, and scheme against Whites

    I guess that’s why the majority of Asian women marry a man of another race, right?

    Same can be said for Jewish women.

    • Disagree: Biff
  73. As with many problems in society, the solution to homosexuality is capital punishment. AI facial analysis can already sniff out these pederasts with a pretty high degree of accuracy, and with more effort I’m sure the accuracy could be improved even more. In a serious society, this should be enough to have them brought in for a comprehensive chomo evaluation to determine if they are truly homosexuals/pederasts and if they should be killed or not.

    • Replies: @James J. O'Meara
  74. Biff says:
    @folkvangr

    This is my 300th post on this website and I am leaving it.

    My heartfelt thanks to every likeminded person who responded to my comments and those who nourished my curiosity and helped me with my struggle to get a grip on complex issues. I guess I have reached a point where I am not satisfied anymore with discussing those issues in the way they are handled here.

    This site is a one-highly-opinionated-and-aggressive-man operation who is using it for advancing someone’s agenda which is so pernicious and evil that everything good that its editor and owner accomplished has been practically nullified. This is why so many brilliant commenters have left this forum.
    Anyway. It’s been a rough journey but I’ve enjoyed it.

    Cheers

    Stepping out of the closet?

  75. Biff says:

    Sounds like this author accidentally joined up with a lady, but later on found the tent pole in the covers, and then this happened:
    https://www.itemfix.com/v?t=3vp62j

  76. @anonymous

    “The sharp edge of a razor is difficult to pass over; thus the wise say the path to Salvation is hard.” – Katha Upanishad

    This applies to nearly any spiritual path or tradition. A key element to walking “the razor” is mastering and disciplining your own sexual impulses.

    If you shun sex and don’t marry, this does not automatically make you a homosexual.

    I don’t know if you’ve noticed, but the human race is pretty good at reproduction and survival. To the point that, an individual may choose NOT to reproduce, and the race will continue on just fine.

  77. @Twin Ruler

    Another Big Brain attracted like a fly to a corpse.

  78. @Somerset Belenoff

    ‘The hate that dare not speak its name’, never shuts up, does it. Let’s face it-these haters, and it could be some other group if not gays that they were aiming their rage at, are simply aiming to create a social atmosphere where repression, mass murder and even genocide become acceptable. Murder is the Universal Solvent.

    • Troll: Johnny LeBlanc
  79. @anarchyst

    I suppose Barwick also opposes unhappy marriages, family violence and/or indifference, poor parenting, divorce and familial sex abuse, the most common type.

    • Replies: @anarchyst
    , @1jonny
    , @Anonymous
  80. Homosexuality is a sin!

    • Agree: JR Foley
    • Replies: @Biff
  81. Karl1906 says:

    One in every 7 humans is homosexual. Deal with it.

    It’s not a lifestyle choice or a genetic defect, it’s also not a burden, curse or stigma. It’s most certainly not a political program and none of other people’s business – no, not even if you’re an exhibitionist. If you can live with it and not make it our problem we can live with you. But if you make it your mission to make it our problem we cannot and we will not live with you.

    And once you start grooming and molesting children or animals – or ANY people and person against their will – you’re a criminal and a danger to society.

    Most people just want to live their lives alone and to be left alone. Deal with it.

    (And it doesn’t matter in exactly the same way if you’re vegan, ginger or a satanist. Just keep your shit to yourself.)

    • Replies: @Dumbo
  82. Anymike says:
    @anarchyst

    You have a point but you also are lying by the numbers, or at least don’t know how to manage the numbers. The presence of active pedophiles among the clergy, youth leaders and educators largely is accounted for by individuals who already are pedophiles who have chosen to enter those occupations in order to gain access to children.

    I don’t consider adults who have relations with teens who are close to legal age to be pedophiles, but they are consciously violating known law and exhibiting bad character. The media also regularly runs stories about female high school teachers who have been charged and convicted of having relations with teenage boys in addition to the stories about male violators.

    Some people believe that pedophilia among Roman Catholic priests is due to the Catholic clergy being unmarried. This really makes no sense. A priest who did not want to remain celibate who was not a pedophile would simply another adult to have a relationship according to their orientation and interests. I am sure they get their offers.

    I seriously doubt very many men become pedophiles because later in life their trolley slips the tracks. I think those who are pedophiles are that from an early age on. But I imagine the issue has been studied by social and behavioral scientists. Maybe someone who knows what the social and behavioral sciences have to say about it should join the discussion.

    • Replies: @Peter D. Bredon
  83. Slav says:
    @Trinity

    There is nothing Bolshevik on homosexuality. It is bourgeoise degeneracy, a feature of idle classes in imperialist societies. Existed in slave owning classes of ancient Greek and Rome.

  84. Dumbo says:
    @anarchyst

    Celibacy has nothing to do with homosexual pederasty or pedophilia. It’s not as if people who do not marry then develop an urge to fuck little boys. They were already homosexual and infiltrated the Church.

    Moreover, it’s not true that this is just a Catholic practice. Roman vestals and priests also had a celibacy/virginity vow. It was/is common in other religions too. Buddhist monks are celibate too.

    The Catholic Church has been infiltrated by a lot of homos, that’s all. The only problem of celibacy would be that it works as a cover for faggots, but then again, there are many fags who have beard marriages, like Macron or Obama.

    • Agree: Mis(ter)Anthrope
  85. Dumbo says:

    Homosexuals are sex-obsessed and self-obsessed narcissists. Probably products of child abuse, that’s why many are sadistic/masochists. At most, it may be caused by hormonal problems, but I don’t think it’s genetic. Mostly, it’s a psychological condition. But you have to wonder, did the egg or the chicken come first? Is homosexuality caused by mental illness, or is mental illness caused by homosexuality?

    In most ways it’s a chosen vice, like drug addiction.

    It’s possible to overcome porn and drug addiction, so I think it’s possible to overcome homosexuality too.

  86. SafeNow says:

    I am old. This might seem like a petty complaint, but I still carry a grudge that Dick Clark secretly populated his American Bandstand dance floor with gay guys. Of course they were terrific dancers. The truth only came out years later. No one had suspected this was happening. Thus, when I was in high school, I felt dance-clunky and this affected my self-confidence, because girls loved to dance. I practiced, trying to excel; it would be like practicing sports, right? No; the practice didn’t help…of course it didn’t, I later learned. Grudge.

    • Replies: @Brad Anbro
  87. In Malaysia there seems to be an underground scene of large gay parties with up to 100 men under one roof. There are sometimes reports of police raids on these parties where drugs are also consumed. The reports state that the police find many used condoms strewn around the room with naked men so at least they seem to be more health conscious. Gyms in Malaysia are also supposed to be gathering places for homos. My impression is that these parties are probably frequented mostly by the Chinese, and that they have similar parties in Taiwan. I don’t know if they have them also in Hong Kong, Singapore and PR China The Malays seem to be more into transvestites and transexuals, and their gays are probably more into one on one sex. I’m not sure what the Indian minority gets up to or if they’re less prone to homosexuality.

    • Thanks: TKK
    • Replies: @Jugon
  88. Lookie here.

    Manufactured Dissent

    And the problem with Pedomos(or pedo-homos).

    https://townhall.com/tipsheet/miacathell/2023/01/17/zulock-case-pt-1-n2618219

    • Replies: @Brad Anbro
  89. Biff says:
    @Twin Ruler

    Homosexuality is a sin!

    So is jerking-off.

    • Replies: @Peter D. Bredon
  90. Dumbo says:
    @Karl1906

    One in every 7 humans is homosexual. Deal with it.

    No it’s not. That would be 14%, lol. Maybe among jews. Maybe among the English. But not in general. It’s at most 3% to 5%. Even Kinsey’s claim of 10% was hugely inflated.

    Homosexuality is a sin and a psychological illness. Deal with it.

    But except for the predatory types, homosexuals should not be hated, but pitied. Most of them live hard, sad lives. Repenting is the best option.

    Oscar Wilde repented.

    • Replies: @Karl1906
  91. Fumanchu says:

    “They are born that way” has always been a lie, and the homos know it, which is why they are always on the recruiting prowl. This was a Trojan Horse to get normal people to let their guard down.

    I have three second cousins who are brothers. They all grew up deep in coal-mining country in Virginia. Two brothers were serially molested by an uncle. They are now adult homos. The other brother was left alone. He is straight. Surely, it’s a coincidence.

    • Agree: Commentator Mike
  92. A fantastic piece on homosexuality. I wish I had had all this information much earlier in my life. Especially important is the scientific part and how the APA changed its definition in 1973.

    This article should be used to confront all MSM propaganda on the subject.

  93. I wonder if homosexuality is growing, and will grow more in the future, because of availability. Propositioning women for sex is becoming an illegal activity in most Western countries where men can now be prosecuted for sexual innuendo, complimenting women on their looks and sexiness, or just looking at them, and this is now classified as “sexist outrage” in France where women feel threatened even by an 81 year old football chief staring at them.

    https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.scmp.com/sport/football/article/3206862/french-football-boss-81-accused-unwanted-sexual-advances

    And if a man decides to satisfy his sexual drive with prostitutes or by recruiting women for porn or web cam sexual encounters he could be prosecuted for “sex slavery” or “human traffic” depending on the country. On the other hand, homosexuals are not known to reject advances by other men for sex, or in the unlikely event that they turn down someone’s unwanted advances they probably won’t call the cops to press charges. Soho now has homo strip bars where once it was known as a red light district for picking up prostitutes.

  94. @mulga mumblebrain

    Wrong! Iit is these groups that are “aiming to create a social atmosphere where repression, mass murder and even genocide become acceptable” by their behaviour, if there is ever a backlash against their agenda, or simply by practicing repression, mass murder and genocide themselves against those who do not agree with their vile practices and their agenda to promote them to the entire population with no age limits.

  95. Anon[939] • Disclaimer says:

    This article sums up some of how the alt-right shoots itself in the foot and dooms itself to failure.
    The author harps on obsessively about gay men. Regards homosexuality the great threat to White/Western civilisation – and to heterosexual men – is the large rise of homosexuality and misandry among women.

    Lesbian propaganda was largely hidden from public view up until about 15 years ago.
    Since then it has become widely present in countless American TVs series, movies, and most of all in pop music videos.
    It’s even become common that sex scenes shown in programs are exclusively among women.
    It’s now presented as if heterosexuality is unattractive, abnormal or even disgusting.

    The mainstream media has orchestrated this rise of homosexuality among women.

    A generation of girls has grown up with the idea that lesbianism is normal, cool, glamorous and ideal.

    Nearly all the women I’ve known who are presently under age 35 identify as bisexual or non-binary or lesbian.

    A generation of girls has been raised to feel indifferent towards males; even to despise and hate men; misandry.

    THAT is what is hurting heterosexual men.

    By comparison gay men really aren’t much of an issue.
    They’re just an easy scapegoat for hurt men to punch down on; pathetically beating on other men; instead of facing and addressing the daunting issue – that many women are now programmed to loathe men.

    Over the past 10 years I know of many relationships where the woman, after countless exposures to lesbian propaganda in the media, have ditched the man and decided to be lesbian.
    In some cases they keep living with the man, in a sexless parasitic co-habitation, so they can milk his financial resources, so that he can pay the bills, and look after the kids, while she sluts about with other women.

    Man after man after man is being used and abused in this manner.
    It’s becoming ‘the new normal’.

    re: ‘Pederasty’ and child abuse, why does the author overlook the sexual abuse that is done by women, done by lesbians?

    From one study report: “In the only prior study based on retrospective reports, children with lesbian mothers (including those temporarily in a lesbian relationship) reported a substantially higher rate of sexual abuse, at 23%, than did those with consistently heterosexual parents …”
    Reference: “Invisible Victims: Delayed Onset Depression among Adults with Same-Sex Parents”, Depression Research and Treatment, Volume 2016 (2016), Article ID 2410392, 8 pages; at https://www.hindawi.com/journals/drt/2016/2410392/

    re: “deviant … strange sexual practices”

    Most women I’ve known keenly engage in anal sex. And many probably do or want to do the other fetishes mentioned in the article. If you indicate you’re open-minded you’ll be shocked at what women will say they want, if they feel they won’t be shamed about it. Though if they suspect you’ll shame them, they won’t say a word. I’ve witnessed that it’s women and especially the lesbians who are the most narcissistic, vulgar and obscene in talking about such things; indifferent to whether others wanted to hear of it.

    re: “The drive to continue our species is both natural and strong among humans.”

    For many if not most if not nearly all people the drive for pleasure is much stronger.
    Women can tell you that. Anyone who knows women well can tell you that.

    re: “Others were obviously gay by virtue of their effeminate mannerisms”

    In my experience the majority of ‘effeminate’ males are heterosexual. Some are perhaps effeminate because they were raised by women. Children are modelled of who they spend time with. Some males are effeminate because they find femininity attractive and consider masculinity, what they’ve witnessed of it, to be repulsive. That is particularly so with male-to-female trans people, arguably the most effeminate of men. They find masculinity to so be truly disgusting they don’t want it in their person. And they are sexually attracted to femininity.
    Conversely a lot of gay man are hyper-masculine. They glorify the male body and macho stereotypes.

    re: “Homosexuality produces only sickness and death”

    Anyone can see it doesn’t. They’re not all sick and dying. Such absolutist language portrays the author as being strangely obsessed with gay men.

    re: “Heritage Americans” and “The Alt-Right and the Homosexual Question”

    Many gay or effeminate-trans men grow up to side with the left and “diversity” because the “Heritage Americans” have been hostile towards them.
    It’s natural for people who’ve been bullied to recoil, flee and seek safe harbour elsewhere.
    The woke left has opened its arms to them, by saying the right words.
    From that point they become unwitting useful idiots; who are used to tear apart western civilisation; naive and unawares that they’ll be far more severely persecuted when other peoples soon become dominant.

    Over time many white “gay” men are harassed and assaulted by “people of colour”; who target them for being white.
    It can require multiple such incidents for them to realise that they are being abused just because they are white.
    If the alt-right, the “Heritage Americans”, gave such men the sense of a safe community, then many of them would change their alliance; and lobby for white people.

    Also, in regards to appealing to women, it’s not a good look for alt-right men to bully men who are viewed as gay or effeminate. It looks weak and pathetic. It turns empathetic people off. It causes them to side with the woke left.

    The white alt-right is doomed to failure – by repelling many white people – if it insists on dividing and scapegoating sections of white people.

    Per % of global population there are not enough white people now for much chance of long-term prosperity, unless white people can feel safe in a white society; in a society that accepts white minority sub-cultures.

    What the alt-right needs to do is work out how to combat the pro-lesbian and pro-race-mixing propaganda that is dividing white women from men.

    That’s daunting. That’s hard. It’s very tempting instead to take the easy route to punch down on “gay” men.
    But doing that dooms us all.

    • Thanks: Commentator Mike
    • Replies: @Hulkamania
    , @Mike Tre
  96. It all started as a business matter.
    I remember that during the dot.com crisis it was proposed to develop homosexual tourism as a better option than drugs, even homosexual marriages were already promoted as a source of a lot of money.
    In South Florida, homosexual development plans were being made for Miami Beach and the Keys. Nothing was said about that this would be the future of humanity.

  97. If homosexuals weren’t so keen on proselytising their deviance, nobody would care to think about what they do with their a**es. The problem is that they have accepted to be a weapon in the Jewish arsenal in the war against white Christian civilisation. Just as nobody would give a sh*t about Jews if they weren’t so obtrusive and noxious, nobody would give a sh*t about the LGBTXYZ if they weren’t so obtrusive and noxious. They’re after kids now for Christ’s sake.
    Let’s admit the obvious: segregation has virtues.

    • Agree: anonymouseperson
  98. Backward says:

    Yet another piece to feed and distract the incel brigade.

  99. Anon[939] • Disclaimer says:
    @KenH

    re: “Domestic violence is also a bigger problem in the homo community …”

    These figures on the high rates of abusive relationships are from a 2011 report by the AIDS Council of NSW (Australia’s most populated state) to a NSW Government inquiry:

    “The Private lives report found that 41% of lesbian relationships and 28% of same sex attracted men had experienced some form of abuse in their current or previous relationships…

    61.8% of transgender males and 42.9% of intersex females reported having been abused in a relationship… it is likely, given the relationship profile of the samples that a significant amount occurred in same sex relationships [1] …

    The impacts of domestic violence on GLBT victims… are similar to those of heterosexual victims but are exacerbated by homophobia, transphobia, heterocentrism and the isolation that many GLBT people experience…”

    Source: “Inquiry into Domestic Violence Trends and issues in New South Wales [Australia]”, 2011 –
    https://www.parliament.nsw.gov.au/lcdocs/inquiries/1687/120827%20Final%20report.pdf

    [1] Note: Regards that, my observations of nearly all trans male to female people I’ve known is that they are “lesbians”. Articles I’ve read support that. That’s why they transition, because they adore feminine features and can’t stand being masculine; can’t stand seeing a man in the mirror. Hence the high level of abuse that they experience in “same sex relationships” is violence largely done by women, and is similar to the high rates of violence among lesbians.

  100. Turn on the showers 🚿 and fire 🔥 the ovens!

  101. RVIDXR says:
    @FKA Max

    Greg is very emotional and prone to hysteria and that’s just how he carries himself in public. Factor in that leaked recording of him pooh poohing the aggressive behavior of his homosexual friend with the implications that suggests and, at least from my perspective, it seems highly unlikely any straight woman would find him attractive once they got to know him outside of some external reason like financial interest.

    Altogether he’s a prime example of why I’d rather take the allegedly less evolutionary advantageous option, that he sided with jews on lockdowns and Ukraine was highly predictable per his homosexual demographic even if the specifics may differ on the latter. That evolutionary benefit you speak of is very subjective, I’d prefer to have less people around who are prone to supporting those things and if given the choice I would choose a more violent warrior society over a more creative peaceful society as you described.

    Also, it’s debatable that a less violent society is less innovative, many innovations that benefitted society happened purely out of motivation to commit violence, for example. The same argument could be applied to genetic fitness but both of these topics are ultimately subject to the genetic interest of whatever tribe is being discussed and what they’re striving for in relation to their environment. So what you laid out may be adaptive to you and your genetic kin but it’s not necessarily adaptive to mine, it’s all subjective dependant on the group and the environment they currently exist in.

    • Replies: @Happy Tapir
    , @FKA Max
  102. Rush says:
    @Thomasina

    Most all father-gay son relationships are not ideal and many Christian counsellors see this as causing the son to be gay and urge for closer involvement of father with son. However this is more an effect than cause as the same father will have straight sons too. What can be observed prior to the son being born is that given a gay son the relationship between mother and father is inverted as to power dynamics in that the wife dominates and husband acquiesces. This is a necessary condition but not sufficient as again there will be straight brothers. All sons need to detach from mother and attach to father. Most make it but the gay brother does not. He has a special requirement for a strong father to encourage him to let go of mother. Observation of the narcissistic and entitled nature of gays aligns with this and observation is that the gay son was mother’s favorite child spoiled by mother who enforces his side in sibling rivalry and in rivalry with father. No matter how involved with the gay son the father might be the reality is always perceived by the gay son as he competes with father for mother’s affection ie mother dominates and father acquiesces. Gay son stays with strong mother rather than jumping over to father whom he rejects and, in later years, disparages. He stays with mother and emotionally takes on her unfulfilled desire for a strong dominant man to be in her life. At puberty this longing attracts gays already in the scene to recruit him and provide the strength his father could not. BDSM is almost mainstrean in homosexual culture as it exhibits this power dynamic whereas it heterosexual culture it is at most a fringe fetish not exhibited.

    • Replies: @Thomasina
  103. anonymous[116] • Disclaimer says:

    women like anal sex too. the anus has dual purposes just like our other wee bits. it definitely has pleasure points in it that rival those other bits both male and female and for the pitcher and the catcher. it’s a great birth control method.

    so stop the anus bashing. they need love too.

    • LOL: bike-anarkist
    • Replies: @Peter D. Bredon
  104. Like the Romans were the sword in the Hand of God that destroyed the Jewish temple, the Russians are the sword in His Hand that destroys the sick, corrupted and degenerate West.

    Get right with His son Jesus, for He may cleanse us from His creation, not by water as He did the first time, but by fire.

    Genesis 6: 5-7

    5 The Lord saw how great the wickedness of the human race had become on the earth, and that every inclination of the thoughts of the human heart was only evil all the time. 6 The Lord regretted that he had made human beings on the earth, and his heart was deeply troubled. 7 So the Lord said, “I will wipe from the face of the earth the human race I have created—and with them the animals, the birds and the creatures that move along the ground—for I regret that I have made them.”

  105. I think it fare to say homos writ large need punishment for what they helped do to America and we Europeans.

  106. Apparently, homosexuality does not occur among hunter-gatherers. The few hunter-gatherer communities left in the world are the last humans who live their lives ruled by nature. Therefore, I am inclined to conclude homosexuality is not a natural phenomenon, it is a disorder induced by human transition to lives which are no longer governed by nature.

    • Thanks: 1jonny
  107. @anarchyst

    This is all wrong. Homosexuality can be detected by computers. It’s biological. When sexual relationship between boys and men were occurring, the boys would almost always find a girlfriend about 15-16.

    Plethysmography of male sexual orientations suggest that the cross-over between age congruent and pedophilic homosexual interest is even weaker than in heterosexual pedophiles. Heterosexual pedophiles have more interest in adult women than homosexual pedophiles have interest in adult males.

    The rest of this is just obvious extremely low IQ nonsense. There is no such accusation that it is a lifestyle. A minority of researchers have suggested pedophilia is best categorized as a prohibited sexual orientation. If you take words literally, this should not cause upset. There is also the matter of the presence of not just sexual but emotional interest, which strongly supports orientation and not paraphilia.

  108. Townhall.com’s investigation into the Zulock case in Georgia …

    A months-long Townhall investigation reveals disturbing new details about the affluent LGBTQ-activist couple accused of sodomizing their young adopted sons—now ages 9 and 11—and distributing “homemade” child pornography of the sexual abuse. Half a year after the shocking story made national news, Townhall is the only outlet following up on the criminal case in Georgia that has since seen zero headlines written about it. We’ve found that it’s far, far worse than what was first reported.

    Not only did the married men allegedly rape the two boys who were adopted through a Christian special-needs adoption agency, they were pimping out their children to nearby pedophiles in Atlanta-area suburbs, Townhall’s follow-up investigation discovered.

    https://townhall.com/tipsheet/miacathell/2023/01/17/zulock-case-pt-1-n2618219

  109. @anarchyst

    And I remind you that the bulk of sex offences are caused by alcoholic relatives with no particular interest in children.

  110. @anarchyst

    As someone who was raised protestant and became catholic, not having to deal with the pastor’s hypocrisy with his family is a net plus.

    This all devolves to the Jewish notion that man cannot have dominion over himself and he he not responsible for his control over his lust.

  111. Rich says:
    @Trinity

    I don’t think so. Normal men always seem to find a woman and settle down with her. Often without the benefit of clergy, but still, with a steady “girlfriend”. Even within our promiscuous society, the majority of White folks are in monogamous relationships. Even adulterous individuals will often leave their long time “partner” to move in with their new girl. “Players”, both male and female, are a small minority in the White nation. Among negros they appear to be much more common and Western media plays this up, but if you look around, or go on the hook-up websites, it turns out it’s the same group of men and women being passed around. Not to say the number isn’t too high, just that it’s nowhere near the majority within the White nation.

    • Agree: TKK
  112. @Twin Ruler

    It’s time for sex according to the natural created order of things.

    http://biblicisminstitute.wordpress.com/2014/08/26/sex-and-the-christian/

    • Agree: RockaBoatus
    • Replies: @mulga mumblebrain
  113. A great thorough article; long overdue, and there should be more of them in a similar fashion. I have always wondered if there is a detailed professional study about how much the AIDS crisis cost America and its health care system? It must be in the hundreds of billions….needless waste of course because it was not the result of a freak accident but due to male sodomy.

    • Thanks: RockaBoatus
    • Replies: @dogbumbreath
  114. Ross23 says:

    One day science will find the cause and possibly the treatment.

    I wonder the outcry it will cause, it’s ok for a man to become a woman but not a homo to a hetero.

    Given the advance of neuroscience the whole LGBT movement may only last a few more decades

    • Replies: @anarchyst
  115. Karl1906 says:
    @Dumbo

    Stimpy, sometimes your wealth of ignorance astounds me.

    • Replies: @Dumbo
  116. It always amazes me that our judicial systems puts people in prison on the basis of guilt by association. Why doesn’t this principle apply in this case.

  117. “For almost fifty years my father had a business in Hollywood. His two large warehouses were near Santa Monica Boulevard and Highland Avenue which at the time were at the epicenter for gay prostitution.”

    Very interesting, coming from one of my favorite authors/commenters here. My dad had a shop for years on Highland Ave., a bit north of Santa Monica Bl. (we lived out in the Valley). And for years, what do you suppose was right next door? A homo bar called Dude City!

    • Thanks: RockaBoatus
  118. Anonymous[380] • Disclaimer says:
    @anarchyst

    Remembering my youth, I recall that around age 13 or 14, those boys who were sexually active sought the adult or juvenile homosexual guy for the purposes of having fellatio performed on them – “really feels good when they put it in their mouths” was how they would put it. Usually the same boy would crave vaginas when they got older and more confidant around girls.
    So, ironically, the boys that grew up to be real “pus– hounds” started out as volunteers for the homosexuals when they were younger. Boys, like myself, who were shy of homosexuals early on stayed shy of sex for a lot longer.
    If honest, most men had the same experience.

    • Replies: @dogbumbreath
    , @Dumbo
  119. Dante placed usurers & sodomites in the same circle of Hell, because they violate the nature of things. The usurer causes debt to reproduce & colonize. The sodomite causes human beings to wither & die. I suggest there is a link between the national debt and the prevalence of sleek, nihilistic, pretty boys in our nation’s cities.
    I forced myself to watch the uploaded documentary about gay men & H.I.V status. I can only conclude that the rainbow flag represents a death cult. When the proprietor of the S&M dungeon states that his customer, “the bottom bitch”, who rented the space; “took forty loads.” I realized the gay party scene is a malignant tumor or a melanoma on the body politic. If this is what gay guys do for recreation, we have a problem. (I realize Glenn Greenwald is an important American. If he is stoned to death the nation will be deprived of an important adversarial journalist.) So the gay who is not anti-social causes the problem to “go away.” I don’t think so. The fact remains; the gay community, like the black community will not police itself. And like the Jewish community will not permit itself to be criticized in publicly by “outsiders.”
    I think this phenomenon is somehow related to the unreality of our economic situation. Perhaps this is the denouement of Capitalism. Investors in end stage Neo-Liberalism prefer the quick return of investments in casinos, pharmacopeia & pornography. As the economy unravels, Husbands & Wives in the Midwest will upload P.O.V., fellatio to the Internet as a form of income generation. Betty Crocker gets a facial and the Peanut Gallery clicked away. Why is this happening? Whose idea of “progress” is this? At some point, the definition of what it means to be an American was redefined. The model American portrayed through the television, “the tabernacle of lucifer” was no longer a producer but a consumer. I’m not an economist but I suggest Volcker & St. Ronnie set this process in motion.
    There’s no defense against this unhygienic & counter-productive activity in the Constitution because all these deviants enjoy the “freedom to assemble” and so forth.
    Perhaps an honest & money based on resources & infrastructure development can reverse the slide. Because pearl clutching moralizing is a waste of time. But I suggest this may be the entropy of things. Going out “not with a bang, but a whimper.”

  120. @Thomm

    You’re wrong. Nobody said that.

    • Replies: @James J. O'Meara
    , @Thomm
  121. First- the percentage is too high. It is probably somewhere between 1% and 3%.

    Second- lesbians should not be put in the same category as male homosexuals. Actually, Windsor-Speyer love story is one of faithfulness & true love. This relation’s legal consequences don’t alter the fact.

    • Replies: @RockaBoatus
  122. anarchyst says:
    @mulga mumblebrain

    I think that every child would rather be in a tumultuous household with heterosexual parents than in a homosexual household.
    Adoption or child-rearing by homosexuals should be strictly prohibited.

    • Replies: @Passing By
  123. anarchyst says:
    @Swaytonious

    I respect your point-of-view on celibacy. You do make a good point…
    Catholic sects (but not Roman Catholic) do allow marriage before laicization occurs. It is not uncommon to see Catholic priests in these other sects who were married as deacons.
    What say you about the Episcopal (Anglican) priests who convert to Catholicism and bring their families with them? How can celibacy be fairly enforced upon Roman Catholic priest candidates but not clergy converts to the Roman Catholic Church?
    I still maintain that clerical celibacy within the Roman Catholic Church is a “custom”, not “dogma”.
    Best regards,

    • Replies: @Swaytonious
  124. anarchyst says:
    @Ross23

    “Conversion therapy” which has a certain amount of success has been banned in some liberal states.
    Homosexuals HATE the fact that there are those who hate the “lifestyle” and want a more “normal” heterosexual life.
    It’s not unlike alcoholism in which behavior modification has a certain amount of success.

    • Replies: @John Johnson
  125. Eireannach says: • Website
    @Thomasina

    Yes of course, many “gays” claim they were like that since childhood. Correct me if I’ve missed something, but I always thought children were asexual. In fact, ancient Greece proves that all homosexuality is the result of childhood grooming. In Greece, the great majority of males were homosexual or bisexual because they were groomed to be so by older men.

    • Replies: @James J. O'Meara
  126. 1jonny says:
    @Anon

    Both can be true, of course.

  127. @anarchyst

    As one who has grown in a “tumultuous household with heterosexual parents”, I couldn’t agree more. My parents were a totally dysfunctional couple and eventually parted. Yet, I definitely prefer that to have been raised by a pair of fags or dykes.

    • Thanks: anarchyst
    • Replies: @mulga mumblebrain
  128. 1jonny says:
    @folkvangr

    Many of us think that the open, aggressive promotion of homosexuality and other even weirder sexual deviations, this promotion seemingly extended down into elementary schools, is a pretty serious topic. Is it that he identifies homosexuality as a perversion that offends you?

  129. @Bardon Kaldian

    “First- the percentage is too high. It is probably somewhere between 1% and 3%” – I’m inclined to agree with you on the percentage. After reviewing several sources addressing the percentage of gays in the U.S. while preparing for this article, there didn’t seem to be a solid consensus. Most placed it much higher than 4.9% which I highly doubt.

    Almost 30 years ago when I first looked into this subject, the percentage of homosexuals was approximately 2% even though the prevailing MSM percentage held it at about 10% of the population.

    With the widespread acceptance of homosexuality in today’s society, including all the gender-bender propaganda that we’re bombarded with, it’s probably higher than 2%, perhaps at 3% to 4% of the overall population? It will likely be higher than this 30 years from now assuming current social-sexual trends.

    • Replies: @James J. O'Meara
  130. Palmm says:

    I was always neutral on this. My “neutrality” has turned to a cold contempt. These sexual deviants have either damage to their soul, or something missing there. Only the most rebellious sodomites have sold their soul. The prudes were right, and I hope there is some normalcy to keep this stuff private and discouraged, because the alternative is violence.

  131. Palmm says:
    @Twin Ruler

    Yes, I believe it was Alexandr Solzenitsyn who basically argued, that the “social justice” movements, including the Communism he endured, is based on a death wish. Sodomy is part of that. It’s the doubling down on Sin like a rebellious 15 year old who does it, just because.

  132. ricpic says:

    “…homosexuality…is rebellion against the natural order.”‘

    ‘That says it all.

    Will the natural order reassert itself in America? Probably not without collapse first.

  133. @Pierre de Craon

    the virtually universal acceptance of the desirability of clerical celibacy can be traced to the Patristic era

    Why so modest? Paul himself says that he would that “all men were as I am”, i.e. unmarried.

    it is by no means unreasonable to suppose that it was more likely the norm than the exception even in the second century AD.

    Paul: “[A bishop] should be the husband of one wife.”

    The plain-as-day evidence of the extent to which contemporary life has, in every respect, become disgustingly and degenerately sexualized should, if anything, bolster what I consider the inescapable conclusion that it would be daylight madness for the Church—Traditionalists first and foremost—to abandon or dilute any further the requirement of celibacy for anyone in Holy Orders.

    So, the dirty Prots are responsible for “contemporary life has, in every respect, become disgustingly and degenerately sexualized.” I’ll allow the Prots to answer that charge, while noting how the Jewish invention, Christianity, is so effective in dividing the goyim into warring parties.

    it would be daylight madness for the Church—Traditionalists first and foremost—to abandon or dilute any further the requirement of celibacy for anyone in Holy Orders. Pope Benedict XV wrote in 1920 that celibacy was of such importance that the Church could never abolish it. I second his authoritative opinion without reservation, and I pray that the Holy Ghost will act in any manner necessary to prevent this critically important discipline’s controversion.

    The later Paul, Paul VI, was advised to maintain the celibacy requirement by a clique of French homosexuals. To this day, the iron rule is “Those cardinals who support celibacy are almost exclusively homosexuals.”

    Frédéric Martel
    In the Closet of the Vatican: Power, Homosexuality, Hypocrisy
    Translated by Shaun Whiteside
    New York: Bloomsbury Continuum, 2019

    • Replies: @Pierre de Craon
  134. Excellent article. I totally agree. The school in my conservative area has a poster of Larry Kramer hanging in there. Ridiculous.

  135. @Bardon Kaldian

    No wonder the “Dissident Right” is so triggered by the polite request for a citation that they made it into a “meme.”

  136. @Hulkamania

    Executing people because of their “chromo” rather than, and before, committing any actual crime, is the “dissident right” version of the Left’s demand to censor wrong opinions.

  137. @FKA Max

    The dynamic I’m describing is jokingly, but I think accurately, illustrated in the following video. Forcing especially male homosexuals to be “closeted” has all kinds of side effects that are not “evolutionary useful”, IMHO:

    Why do we have to choose between:

    1. Pressuring them to lie and marry women which not only leads to devastating relationships for the women and children but also passes on their genes. In the age of hook up apps this often leads to women getting some STD when the men eventually crack and cheat.

    2. Celebrating faggotry as part of national culture and suppressing anyone that talks about how we have to spend billions on health care bills for their wanton promiscuity.

    Even with gayness celebrated in the media on a daily basis it is still common for gays to follow option #1. So even in a culture where gays are told they are super special it is still the norm for them to marry a woman. In fact I suspect there are entire denominations where a significant portion of the men are gay. The Catholic Church still attracts gays and who knows how many are secular and looking for cover.

    The answer is certainly to not accept #1 or #2 and be resolved to the results. Neither are acceptable.

    Traditional 50s society of closeting them does not work and neither does letting them orgy until they get a disease and expect society to pay the bill. Talk to anyone in health care about this problem. They party in their 20s and then show up in their 30s to find out they have all kinds of expensive complications. Well they often go on Medicaid because it is impossible for them to work and pay all their medical bills.

    • Replies: @FKA Max
  138. @Anymike

    Maybe someone who knows what the social and behavioral sciences have to say about it should join the discussion.

    You won’t find many of those reading Unz.com. The Official Line is “Social science is run by commies and isn’t physics anyway so who cares. Now let me tell you what my grandpappy always said on the topic…”

    • Replies: @John Johnson
    , @Anymike
  139. @Biff

    Conservatives have been butt-hurt about Pope Francis ever since he dared to point that out. “People think we are obsessed with sex. There are many other sins we could be concerned about.” [paraphrased].

    Alan Watts, former Episcopal priest, pointed out that “living in sin” has acquired only one meaning, and it isn’t that the couple in question is defrauding the public by selling adulterated baked goods.

  140. @anarchyst

    “Conversion therapy” which has a certain amount of success has been banned in some liberal states.

    I don’t believe for one second that conversion therapy works in even 10% of the cases.

    I had more faith in such ideas before having to be around homosexuals in the city through my work. My experience is similar to the author and I quickly stopped believing the media image that they are basically straight men but only differ in sexual preference. Gay men think differently than straight men and an unnerving amount of them are in a constant state of perversion. They think this is the norm and that we straight men have only learned to hide it.

    Conversion therapy just gives them a place to meet other closeted gays. Even worse is that it encourages them to marry or stay married to a Christian woman. That is extremely cruel to the woman. I have read a lot about these closeted cases where the woman is practically ready to hang herself because she is convinced that her husband isn’t attracted to her and she is the problem. Gay men are not attracted to women in the least and I don’t see how Bible scripture would change that. They are so unattracted to women that they think we straight men only live with women out of societal pressure. Anyone that thinks conversion therapy is a worthwhile investment needs to spend time around gay men. They are completely hopeless.

    But a positive corollary is that it is actually really difficult to turn straight men gay and Christian/right-wing concerns of mass gaying are baseless. However society should investigate claims of homosexual predatory of juveniles in an attempt to convert them. I really don’t know much about this area but it should warrant concern.

    • Replies: @anarchyst
  141. I am surprised to see several people getting upset when this article came up.

    For a long long time homosexuality was looked down on.
    At the very least not to be promoted.

    Sodomy is not normal. The lbgt group is around 3-7% of the population.
    Maybe the younger generation or a few cities have more.
    Someone above actually stated 1/7 only for homosexuals. That is crazy.
    The numbers are available on the internet of various polls.
    Even Kinsey estimate of 1/10 was high was homos alone.

    If you allow one deviance, it will lead to another.
    If you allow one foreign immigrant group, it will lead to another.

    • Agree: spacewonderer
    • Replies: @spacewonderer
  142. 1jonny says:
    @mulga mumblebrain

    In that part that was quoted of her or discussed about her there’s no indication that she favors other kinds of disfunction.

  143. ricpic says:
    @anonymous

    “…the whole Abrahamic ‘eternal torture hell’ religion project…”

    Judaism has practically no references to damnation, eternal hell fires, or the sadomasochistic tone that is so prevalent in Christian texts.

    Judaism does reference an angry God and His stern judgment.

    Sorry, but Protestantism did not inherit its hysterical bent from The Jews.

    • Replies: @John Johnson
  144. @anonymous

    I once saw a comment on FB along the lines of:

    God’s sense of humor: forbids sodomy, puts prostate gland in anus.

  145. CSFurious says:

    Buggery used to be punishable by death in the English Royal Navy.

  146. Almost as bad, and as nauseating as gay sex is white people fucking niggers.

    • Replies: @1jonny
  147. Thomasina says:
    @Rush

    Thanks for your excellent reply. Yes, the lack of detachment from the mother (for whatever reason) sets up the cascade of events you describe. It is incumbent on both parents to make sure this detachment occurs because, if it does not, it not only tragically harms the son (who ends up being gay), but can also seriously affect the other children. Everyone is the loser in this dynamic.

    “All sons need to detach from mother and attach to father. Most make it but the gay brother does not. He has a special requirement for a strong father to encourage him to let go of mother.”

    Yes, if the father IS willing to take on the task, then it all hinges on whether the mother wants to let go. But if the mother is not emotionally stable and views the process as her being rejected when the son tries to cross over to the father, then she might not want to let go of her soon-to-be gay son. In essence, a direct competition with the father ensues. If the father acquiesces (he senses the mother’s instability), the son is doomed.

    And, of course, the son would sense this tension too. As with everyone, his primary instinct is to survive. If he feels threatened at all by the mother, if he senses it is dangerous to make the cross over to the father, he might seek to protect himself by staying with the mother. Unfortunately, he will fawn over her until the day she dies (although he died long ago), and she will love every minute of it. His death is her birth.

    It’s sick, but like most personality disorders, it is done out of a need to protect oneself. Homosexuality is but one example.

    We know so much more now, but unfortunately what should be on the front page of every newspaper never gets talked about.

    Thanks for posting.

  148. Rain says:

    Biowarfare didn’t only start with the jabs:
    Making Men More ‘Feminine’ (Via Rain?)
    https://pennybutler.com/atrazine/

  149. @Peter D. Bredon

    Maybe someone who knows what the social and behavioral sciences have to say about it should join the discussion.

    You won’t find many of those reading Unz.com. The Official Line is “Social science is run by commies and isn’t physics anyway so who cares. Now let me tell you what my grandpappy always said on the topic…”

    It isn’t far from the truth. The social sciences are dominated by left-wing White women that have no interest in what is true or not. White men are pushed out of the social sciences early on and social science profs even use the term “stickler” for White male students that ask pesky questions.

    The social sciences embraced critical theory which is openly against objective thinking. This comes from the openly leftist Frankfurt School which claimed that seeking objective reality is biased towards Western traditionalism and Euro-centrism. They oppose even suggesting that such a reality exists and can be studied. Amusingly a social science professor can decree any alternative to reality to exist. So they can state that phenomenon A is caused by racism and without any proof. If anyone asks questions related to proof they can resort to critical theory and accuse the person asking the question of racism.

    If you have so much faith in the social sciences then read about the dog park rape hoax:
    https://www.wweek.com/news/schools/2018/10/09/a-portland-state-university-professor-made-up-a-study-of-dog-on-dog-sexual-assault-and-got-the-hoax-published/

    Or how someone got Mein Kampf published in a feminist journal:
    https://www.thecollegefix.com/hoax-project-gets-a-woke-version-of-mein-kampf-accepted-by-feminist-journal/

    It shows the result of rejecting objective thinking. Anything becomes accepted as long as it has a left-wing veneer.

    The social sciences have been entirely corrupted by left-wing theory. You can even find Sociology 101 books where they put quotes in “objective thinking” as if it is just another subjective theory.

  150. @folkvangr

    Put a sock in it, tinkerbell. This article is very relevant to culture, since the culture vultures have elevated gayness and trannyism to the most lofty ideals for our country. Along with minority-worship.
    It’s all just surreal.

    • Replies: @Gododdin
  151. @Anonymous12890

    Exactly. The pervs will never be fully satisfied, so there will be no end to this madness. First the flamers just wanted respect and lack of discrimination against them. Then it was gay pride and parades, hijacking the formerly-innocent the rainbow as their symbol. Then it was gay couples adopting kids, then gay civil unions, then gay marriage. They got all of that, but couldn’t just stop. So now we have this insane tranny movement obnoxiously inserting itself (no pun intended) into every aspect of our “culture.”

    So what’s next after trannyism is fully-integrated into the American character? Beastiality? Pedophilia? I’m betting on the latter, with the perv lobby agitating to lower the age of consent for “consensual” relations.

  152. Pancho says:

    Today’s America is a version on steroids of the Weimar Republic, which eventually brought Hitler and the Nazis. But the New Sodom makes the Weimar Republic pale in comparison.

  153. @mulga mumblebrain

    Ah, of course, “mulga mumblebrain,” the useless idiot defender of American imperialism is a pederast. Who could have predicted it?

    • Replies: @mulga mumblebrain
  154. @ricpic

    Judaism does reference an angry God and His stern judgment.

    Sorry, but Protestantism did not inherit its hysterical bent from The Jews.

    Well God does get pretty pissed off in the Old Testament. He turned an entire city into salt and ordered some pretty serious reprisals against the enemies of Israelites.

    But the Jews do find the fire and brimstone preaches to be strange. They actually don’t promote the idea of hell.

    I asked about this as a kid and was told that they will go to hell without Jesus.

    So the people that God describes as special and wrote the Old Testament are going to hell? Based on preachers that quote the Old Testament?

    Yea …. sure……that makes a lot of sense. Hang on while I hit myself in the head with a hammer to understand it all.

  155. @Anon

    Women are irrelevant for the future because artificial wombs will be operable in 20 years or less. After that, females will be pointless and obsolete. Even worse, they will be liabilities, due to their inability to function within modern civilization. Therefore, they will go extinct, just like VHS tapes or CRT computer monitors.

    • LOL: Trinity, John Johnson
  156. @Political Science 101

    A great thorough article; long overdue, and there should be more of them in a similar fashion. I have always wondered if there is a detailed professional study about how much the AIDS crisis cost America and its health care system? It must be in the hundreds of billions….needless waste of course because it was not the result of a freak accident but due to male sodomy.

    “Brainwashing” is the ultimate weapon. There is no such thing as HIV/AIDS. Viruses are fake. STD’s like Gonorrhea are a “bacterial” infection. Only proven pathogens are bacteria, fungi and parasites….these pathogens can lead to death. The money used to treat HIV/AIDS (i.e. drugs and treatment) only enriched the drug companies and medical industry without benefit to the patient. In fact, it was HIV/AIDS drugs like AZT (toxic brew) which sped up death. Others who died with so called HIV/AIDS just didn’t change their toxic lifestyle (i.e. homo activity, drug/alcohol abuse and poor diet). If a doctor tells you you have HIV/AIDS, the best cure is to change your lifestyle immediately and be “human” as Nature intended. Due to “brainwashing”, 80% of the people don’t even know how to “live as Nature intended”.

    Read “Virus Mania”:

    • Replies: @Political Science 101
  157. Trinity says:

    Face it, I bet less than 20% of people who call themselves Jews are “religious.” MOST are straight up atheists, apologies to NORMAL atheists for that one. It is NO Cohencidence that perversion and mental illness is common place in the tribe. Bad genes.

  158. Anonymous[110] • Disclaimer says:
    @mulga mumblebrain

    I suppose Barwick also opposes unhappy marriages, family violence and/or indifference, poor parenting, divorce and familial sex abuse, the most common type.

    1. Since when are homosexual couples immune from such problems? If anything, these pathologies are higher among homosexual couples, and homosexual men who adopt children do so for one explicit purpose — to sexually assault the boys (gay male couples rarely, if ever, adopt girls).

    Get a gay man drunk enough, and he will tell you about the guy time he was innocent and then molested by another male. Get him even drunker and he will tell you about the first time he did the same thing it to another innocent young boy.

    Gays aren’t born, they are created by pedophile sexual assault by a homosexual before or during adolescence.

    • Thanks: 1jonny
    • Replies: @John Johnson
  159. Currahee says:
    @smarter than you

    Yes, real life experience always contradicts the narrative, which is why the young do not question or challenge.

  160. Anonymous[110] • Disclaimer says:
    @jinkforp

    Kinsey specifically recruited his test and survey subjects from the County Jail of Marion County, Indiana (which had a much higher percentage of sexual deviates than the jails of Monroe County, around Indiana University (Bloomington, Indiana), where his office was and where he and his staff conducted their orgies^H^H^H↑H^H^H “research”.

    I know from personal conversations with a fellow student at Purdue that working for the Kinsey Institute was the cause of MANY divorces. The Kinsey Institute is a racket… a bordello masquerading as a research facility.

  161. @Anonymous

    Remembering my youth, I recall that around age 13 or 14, those boys who were sexually active sought the adult or juvenile homosexual guy for the purposes of having fellatio performed on them – “really feels good when they put it in their mouths” was how they would put it. Usually the same boy would crave vaginas when they got older and more confidant around girls.
    So, ironically, the boys that grew up to be real “pus– hounds” started out as volunteers for the homosexuals when they were younger. Boys, like myself, who were shy of homosexuals early on stayed shy of sex for a lot longer.
    If honest, most men had the same experience.

    Are you joking? Any “normal” teenage boy who can’t get a girl would either:

    1) Jack off with a Playboy centerfold
    2) Jack off with a hot female TV celebrity
    3) or wait (i.e.to pickup a girl or have enough money to get a female prostitute)

    Under NO circumstance would what you describe above be considered acceptable. Any male who went your path is “scared for life” and will require some kind of atonement.

  162. @Swaytonious

    This all devolves to the Jewish notion that man cannot have dominion over himself and he he not responsible for his control over his lust.

    This assumes that marital relations are no more than lust. Many of the first Christians, and later Augustus, would agree. This is the strand of Christianity that put words into the mouth of the “Jesus” character about become eunuchs for the kingdom of heaven, and how looking at a woman with “lust in your heart” is equivalent to adultry.

    To a normal person, however, marital relations are not “lust.” We see this in Paul’s epistles, where, since “Jesus” never returned, the nascent church was forced to recognize sexual relations: OK in marriage, not outside.

    Anyway, the point is that “control over lust” is simply monogamous marriage, it doesn’t require total celibacy.

    As someone who was raised protestant and became catholic, not having to deal with the pastor’s hypocrisy with his family is a net plus.

    Wilhelm Reich was a con man, but he did have a good point when he would ask Protestant ministers in public debates, if they only had sex with their wives to have children.

    It never gets old:

    Celibacy = alien episcopal supremacy, and we’re having none of it!

  163. Bro43rd says:
    @The Real World

    The poster was “out” in his previous comments. Usually not so delirious though. Hit too close to home I guess.

  164. @Eireannach

    In Greece, the great majority of males were homosexual or bisexual because they were groomed to be so by older men.

    I’m confused. I thought “all Greeks were gay” was a Woke talking point. Isn’t the Right response “Akshually, the Greeks condemned homosexuality both socially and legally. Don’t be fooled by a handful of quotes from homosexual writers.”

    • Replies: @raga10
    , @raga10
  165. @RockaBoatus

    I’ve always thought that the “naturally repugnant” talking point is contradicted by the “it’s spreading and soon everyone will be gay” talking point.

    • Replies: @Dumbo
  166. anarchyst says:
    @John Johnson

    Your argument about “conversion therapy” being ineffective doesn’t wash.
    “Conversion therapy” is on a similar level as Alcoholics Anonymous.
    You assertion that “conversion therapy” is a meeting place for homosexuals is no different than Alcoholics Anonymous being a meeting place for alcoholics.
    In both situations, the person has to WANT TO CHANGE and must make every effort to do so.
    In both cases, it is no secret that some alcoholics use Alcoholics Anonymous as a place to look for a drinking partner, no different that “conversion therapy” meetings used as a place for homosexuals to “hook up”.
    In both cases, the intent is what matters.
    I commend those who truly want to change, both at “conversion therapy” clinics and Alcoholics Anonymous.
    I stand by my statements…

  167. @Anonymous

    Gays aren’t born, they are created by pedophile sexual assault by a homosexual before or during adolescence.

    The numbers don’t work out on that. It would require millions of pedophiles throughout all societies.

    Gay men are definitely born.

    Most of them had some other abnormal behavior as children that is associated with the opposite sex.

    Meaning they were suspected as gay at a young age.

    I would bet that most teachers can predict gay boys at an early age. I’m not saying that kids are gay (they should not be sexualized) but I bet a kindergarten teacher could do it with reasonable accuracy.

    Even when playing with boys they will play more like girls. They don’t understand why boys want to smash stuff or get dirty. These differences become apparent early on. My wife’s friend has a gay kid and he wanted barbie stuff at age 4. A conservative Christian family. It’s insulting to the family to suggest he was raped. The kid is fine….just really gay. He also has a brother that is completely straight and yet they get blamed for not trying to correct the gay kid. That suggests genes and not environment and it is wrong for Christians to blame them when the other boy is obviously normal.

    Racial differences show up before children can talk. If gayness is also genetic then we should also see early signs. Everything I have seen points to that reality.

    • Replies: @anon
    , @Pratisara
  168. anon[165] • Disclaimer says:
    @anarchyst

    It’s always a question of mine, if someone experimented in a gay way do they ever decide that they didn’t want to go on and then decide to be straight? It seems as though especially with males that they are gay for life, even if they were molested, like they can’t decide they don’t want to be gay. When woman/girls are molested raped, they are told it’s not their fault, but it seems boys can’t escape when they are hurt. The stigma that they are that way for life and nothing will ever help them and no one will want them either.” They can’t change. They didn’t do something they regret it’s who they are.” It’s what you hear from some who were hurt when they were young and then they begin to say things like ” but they liked it”. Some women also can’t help what their body does when they are abused, I could imagine young boys can’t either. I wonder if this is expressed to them? Rather than say stigmatizing them and encouraging them to remain in the lifestyle, They should be taught to see it as abuse, that they are no more guilty of than any woman/girl raped.

  169. Anymike says:
    @Peter D. Bredon

    To a degree, I actually am defending the Catholic Church. The rate of pedophilia among Catholic priests is about the same as among other clergy, youth leaders and educators – about one in 50. The 1950s film actor James Dean was initiated into bisexuality as a teenager by a Protestant youth pastor in his hometown in Indiana. The pastor, when he was in his 70s, publicly admitted to the relationship.

    I imagine that adult-adolescent relationships are quite common in the world of leftist activism. The reasons why these never lead to later civil litigation are several. The so-called victims themselves may see these liaisons merely as part of the coming-of-age process. Or, even if they think they were exploited, may not want to harm the “movement” by exposing some prominent figure.

    In most cases, left wing groups either never had an actual legal existence or if they once did no longer do, and even if they still exist control no significant assets. The individual adults who were the offenders may have no significant assets to their name either. In the sum of these things, even if the victim was exploited, lawyers may not be willing to take the case because there will be no money in it.

    The Catholic Church in contrast represents an attractive target. It has an enduring corporate structure and controls a lot of property. It also has the capacity to raise money through its larger membership base.

    Beyond that, because the Catholic Church has a significant corporate structure, it is easy for people to see the Catholic Church as particularly transgressive in its toleration of pedophilia. The there is the possibility that there are some people who want to harm the Catholic Church and its reputation and see the negative publicity devolving from the pedophilia scandal as means of doing that.

    The same elements then turned to Scouting as their next target. Although they brought some valid legal actions and ultimately procured a settlement, they just never got the same mileage out of it as they got out of going after the Catholic Church.

    • Replies: @GomezAdddams
    , @anarchyst
  170. FKA Max says: • Website
    @John Johnson

    No disagreement from me there, that’s why I wrote “societally beneficial reduction in intra-male mating competition when/if open homosexuality is accepted/tolerated to a certain healthy degree within a society/country.” As I pointed out upthread https://www.unz.com/article/my-journey-to-the-homosexual-question/#comment-5757477 Whites probably have the lowest rates of homosexuality among the ethnicities. And also amongst the lowest rates of STDs, e.g. HIV, etc.Image Source: https://www.hiv.gov/hiv-basics/overview/data-and-trends/impact-on-racial-and-ethnic-minorities or https://archive.ph/7qast
    Black women, for example, have more than double the HIV infection rate of White men, and Hispanic women have almost has high of HIV infection rates as White men do:Image Source: https://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2012/dpk-latino-AIDS-new-infections.html or https://archive.ph/N9wrO
    So, the higher the White share of a population is, the less disease and healthcare costs should be a problem. Establishing the former (creating White ethno states (again)) takes care of most of the latter (reducing disease and degeneracy).

  171. Thomm says:
    @Bardon Kaldian

    I am not wrong. Commenter ‘Truth’ has witnessed this question posed many times, and can vouch for witnessing how most WNs answer :

    https://www.unz.com/isteve/new-yorker-glaring-whiteness/#comment-5516904

    I could post individual examples of responses by regulars here, but that would be too many links and thus not clear moderation. Suffice it to say that what mainstream whites accurately think about WNs is proven to be true by a simple question like this one being posed to the latter.

  172. Anon[377] • Disclaimer says:
    @Thomasina

    Asking a homosexual about their sexuality and receiving an answer that it was “natural” for them. Of course they would say that. They want to believe that they’re normal and natural.

    Similar to asking criminals of color why they commit violent crimes disproportionately, and receiving answers that a racist society forces them into violent criminal behavior.

    Children of three, four, and five years of age cannot rationally decide which sugary breakfast cereal they should consume, much less on their own decide that they are homosexuals.

  173. anon[165] • Disclaimer says:
    @John Johnson

    Boys played with dolls. Mostly the boys threw girls things out the window. Even us girls only cut the hair off and watched the dog bury them across the street. But boys had boy dolls. Maybe he just needs boy dolls. My friend when I was a kid he had a planet of the apes tree house. My son played with x-men dolls. He’s little, stop selling him down the river already. That’s what is scary about people in the schools looking for little suspected budding gay kids, finding them so they can help mold them into that “amazing child” in the video, who seems like maybe he might like trains and a different set of role models.

    • Replies: @John Johnson
  174. Pratisara says:
    @John Johnson

    >>Gay men are definitely born.

    trying to understand…if being gay is genetic, then someone up the ancestry was gay (parent, grandparent etc) – as is fairly common with diabetes, being tall, curly hair, mental diseases etc.

    But gay people don’t breed (unlike diabetics or tall people) – so how do they pass their gayness on?

    • Replies: @John Johnson
  175. raga10 says:
    @James J. O'Meara

    I’m confused. I thought “all Greeks were gay” was a Woke talking point. Isn’t the Right response “Akshually, the Greeks condemned homosexuality both socially and legally. Don’t be fooled by a handful of quotes from homosexual writers.”

    My response to Right’s response 🙂

  176. @FKA Max

    Tolerance of homosexuality is also associated with stronger economic growth

    This is what queer culture does to women:

    MORE THAN 85% OF MAJORS FROM TOP FASHION SCHOOLS ARE FEMALE, BUT ONLY AROUND 14% OF THE TOP 50 MAJOR FASHION BRANDS ARE RUN BY WOMEN.

    • Replies: @FKA Max
    , @Mike Tre
  177. Bruno says:

    Alan Turing.

    Socrates.

  178. @anarchyst

    In the Anglican position, its a net positive for the church because I’ve seen them being entire parishes with them. The thought is that the marriage aspect will sort it self out in the fullness of time.

    When you want to talk about fairness, that is where you get it twisted.. it isn’t about fairness.. it is about sacrifice to God.. if your worried about fairness you’re in the wrong realm.. life isn’t fair and the catholic church will be the first to tell you that. The thing about trad Christianity is to pick up your cross and follow him is to die to yourself.. this overt infatuation with fairness among our people has also been the linchpin to the jews taking over. Remember that.

    And again, I’ve seen a pastor’s family drama ruin congregations. It was one of the many things I liked about converting.

    • Replies: @anarchyst
  179. Homosexuality apparently does not exist among human hunter-gatherers. It appears to occur among some male domestic sheep but not among their wild ancestor, the mouflon. So a hypothesis may be that modern humans are a “domesticated” version of original humans. We no longer live our lives dominated by nature. In nature sex is tightly tied to reproduction.

    https://genetiker.wordpress.com/2013/05/03/the-cause-of-homosexuality/

  180. FKA Max says: • Website
    @Davy Crocket

    Yup,

    Homosexuals? … I have seen young women ruined by these awful queers: drugs, divorce, scandal. They will use any means to destroy a competitor and to wreak vengeance on a woman. The queers want to be women—but they are lousy women. They are charming! ~ Coco Chanel https://www.unz.com/aanglin/ye-and-nick-go-on-alex-jones-ye-confirms-hitler-no-brakes/?showcomments#comment-5688443

    I took two semesters of fashion design over in Europe (Munich) after high school, and quit because I realized that I couldn’t make or tolerate it in that industry, since I’m not a homosexualist. Very good learning experience/life lesson though, well worth the tuition fee.

    Recommended reading:

    Why We Follow Fashion
    http://www.lloydianaspects.co.uk/vintageSite/evolve/fashion.html or https://archive.ph/h0kKq
    So, that is my theory: that the fact that modern British women are more interested in fashion than men is down to a person’s ability to narrow the field of competition by excluding outsiders from the in-group of rivals.
    And examples, of some of the more wholesome fashion shows:

    [MORE]

    Cruise 2011/12 Show – CHANEL Shows

    Paris-Salzburg 2014/15 Métiers d’art Show – CHANEL Shows

    • Replies: @Davy Crockit
  181. @Thomm

    Perhaps the reason is this is a stupid, disingenuous question designed in such a way that either answer calls into question the core beliefs of the person at which it’s directed. I wouldn’t answer it either. It’s a false choice.

    Thomm, would you rather hump a kid or a dog? You must choose one or the other. You cannot refuse to answer. Either answer makes you look bad.

    Whew this is so much easier than presenting an actual argument!

    • Replies: @Thomm
  182. White fatherhood was everywhere despised

    And white men only always feminized

    In the anticulture they were given,

    Where the world their fathers had striven

    To build was built on stolen privilege,

    The sum of their majestic knowledge

    Nothing more than lies. It began to dawn

    The language itself had been made a weapon

    Against them, their aesthetics and morals.

    The Enemy understood Orwell

    Not as a warning but his blueprint,

    And at last it came home that his intent

    Was no less than their spiritual death

    By torture until they confessed that truth

    Was calumny, corruption was beauty,

    Infertility and sodomy their duty–

    The last, bastard, effeminate sons

    Begging for their humiliations

    Till extinction….

    • Agree: JR Foley
    • Thanks: TKK
  183. Dumbo says:
    @Karl1906

    You’re the one who quoted a completely wrong number out of nowhere.

  184. @Mick Jagger Gathers No Mosque

    I greatly appreciate your bringing the existence of this book to my attention. The longer article that “Boniface,” the author of the review, links to can no longer be found at the link he provides. Here is the updated link.

  185. raga10 says:
    @James J. O'Meara

    Greeks condemned homosexuality both socially and legally.

    Slightly more serious response: it depends… quoting from https://bigthink.com/the-past/pederasty-homosexuality-ancient-greece/ :

    The way that Plato, Aristotle, and their contemporaries conceived of human sexuality was fundamentally different from the way we do today. Hellenistic scholars doubt the Greeks would have been able to understand the modern distinction between homosexual and heterosexual relationships. In classical antiquity, people didn’t care if you were attracted to men or women; what mattered was whether you were the dominant (active) or submissive (passive) partner in the bedroom.

    Pederasty was widespread across the disjointed city-states that made up ancient Greece. In some of his philosophical dialogues, Plato suggests that even Socrates enjoyed the company of young, male lovers. But while pederasty itself was everywhere, social attitudes toward the practice varied from region to region. In some communities, like Sparta, relationships between boys and men were explicitly permitted, even institutionalized. In other places, such as Athens, laws were put in place to eradicate what was slowly being regarded as an archaic, unnatural tradition.

    It has been argued that pederasty originated from coming-of-age rituals that could date back as far as the Stone Age. In Sparta, the practice had adapted to the city-state’s unique culture, which emphasized community over family. Children were raised by the agōgē, not their parents. The older lovers — called erastes in academic literature — had as much authority over their beloveds as their biological fathers did. The idea, as Plutarch puts it, was that “they were all in a sense the fathers and tutors and governors of all the boys.”

    In ancient Athens, things were a little more complicated. While most Athenians believed there was nothing wrong with a man being in love with or feeling attracted to another man, there were, as David Cohen explains in his article, “Law, Society and Homosexuality in Classical Athens,” mixed feelings about males “adopting a submissive role that was unworthy of a free citizen.” There appear to have been no laws prohibiting homosexual relations in general.
    There was, however, a law that prohibited you from committing what was known as hubris: the act of humiliating or dishonoring another person for one’s own gratification. A quintessentially Greek concept, hubris not only encompassed prostitution and sexual assault, but also “consensual” relationships. According to Cohen, men who consented to being the submissive partner were “often described as committing hubris against themselves.” Crucially, the same standards did not apply to slaves who — being slaves — were perceived as lacking both pride and honor.

  186. Bruno says:

    So the white ethno-state dream is not western societies in the 50ies but a Handmaid’s tale nightmare or at best a jehovah witness picture. I would rather go with the gays & the jews then.

  187. Anonymous[112] • Disclaimer says:

    I am curious if the author ever got a blowjob or tried the back door w his wife? How unnatural.

    • Replies: @Psychotic Break
  188. Mike Tre says:
    @Anon

    Hello there Map, it’s clear you have a lot to say but even more to learn. I’ve provided you with a pretty clear example of why homosexuality is a big net loss for any functioning civilization.

    https://townhall.com/tipsheet/miacathell/2023/01/17/zulock-case-pt-1-n2618219

    Now I don’t expect you to really get it. You’re too busy penning long, rambling non sequiturs, justifications, misconceptions, false premises, and false equivocations. Go ahead and throw another 1000 words at us. Most will know to skip along.

  189. @anon

    Boys played with dolls. Mostly the boys threw girls things out the window. Even us girls only cut the hair off and watched the dog bury them across the street. But boys had boy dolls. Maybe he just needs boy dolls.

    Boys sometimes play with dolls. Girls sometimes wrestle and play with trucks. I’m aware of that. Neither should be scolded or forced into playing with either.

    This is not a case of a kid that just needs to be handed some trucks and toy guns. Believe me, they have tried.

    He wanted a tiara for his birthday.

    If he just needed to be around boy stuff then the same would be true for his brother. His brother is into sports and seems like any normal boy.

    Some kids are just born gay. I know it conflicts with Christianity but that is the reality. A lot of biology conflicts with Christianity. Conservative Christians often get upset if we talk about race and DNA. What are we supposed to do? Pretend it doesn’t exist?

    That doesn’t mean we should tell kids they are gay but some of them are not hard to spot.

    The numbers however are exaggerated. It is not 10% or even close. More like 1-2% for men that were born hopelessly gay and will never change. Maybe another 1-2% that are somewhere in the middle but I’m skeptical. Definitely not over 5% and that includes the nebulous bisexual men that are supposedly everywhere according to leftists.

    • Replies: @anon
    , @Hulkamania
  190. @James J. O'Meara

    Queer logrolling—de cette source, quelle surprise!

    See comments nos. 159 and 192.

  191. Dumbo says:
    @Anonymous

    Where did you grow up, Sodoma County?

    Where I grew up, no young man that I recall started out as a “volunteer for homosexuals”. Unless he was or became a flaming homosexual himself.

    But it’s perhaps true that homosexuality could be really a form of hyper-sexuality, more than “same sex attraction” per se. Although, I wouldn’t know. I never really understood it.

  192. @Pratisara

    But gay people don’t breed (unlike diabetics or tall people) – so how do they pass their gayness on?

    Gay people do breed. It’s called being closeted.

    How would a gay gene be passed on if discourages attraction to the opposite sex? It could be recessive.

    There are recessive diseases that don’t benefit the carrier when they are expressed.

    They get passed on because people don’t know that they have them.

    There is an interesting theory that the gay gene in men was actually a mutation for women and it basically flips. Basically a horny for men gene that encourages women to procreate. In men it makes them excessively sexual and attracted to other men.

    • Agree: FKA Max
    • Replies: @Pratisara
  193. @Thomm

    Again- wrong. Nobody said that. One guy just said that he would perhaps go celibate.
    Nobody said they would go gay (of course, straight men).

  194. Dumbo says:
    @James J. O'Meara

    There’s nothing more cringeworthy than a homosexual trying to convince normal people that homosexuality is natural, wonderful, healthy, beautiful, etc. At least a whore is not trying to convince herself or others that she’s anything other than a whore.

    If homosexuality is spread by sexual abuse, and/or other psycho-sociological issues, then it is logical that it may increase or decrease according to changes in society (and the number of children abused). Hell, even if it was genetic (it isn’t, but just as an hypothesis) the number could be variable.

    • Replies: @John Johnson
    , @Shamu
  195. Mike Tre says:
    @Davy Crocket

    I though it was made pretty obvious decades ago that since all of the top fashion designers were homosexual men, they preferred taller thin female models because they most closely resembled pubescent boys. Of course this was back in the days when the designers had to keep somewhat of a lid on their perversions.

    Now they just roll out negress land whales on the runway while they sneak off to bugger a trafficked 12 year old boy.

  196. @Anonymous

    I managed to get the back door quite a lot with my wife. It was fantastic; like a religious experience. It’s tight round the girth at the lowest part of the shaft but the ejaculation is like exploding into a void. Its the most erotic thing ever. If ever I won the lottery I’d make it a full time occupation. I suppose, to be fair, a boy’s butt has to be the same as a girl’s. And if its that good a gay boy could say to himself, he could trade his own in exchange. And maybe its actually a pleasure for him too. So what this tells me is not the repugnance of gay itself, at least as I see it, not so much the actual male-on-male anal sex act (as gross as that is), but the absurd intimacy of man-on-man kissing.

    • Replies: @Stripes Duncan
  197. @Dumbo

    If homosexuality is spread by sexual abuse, and/or other psycho-sociological issues, then it is logical that it may increase or decrease according to changes in society (and the number of children abused). Hell, even if it was genetic (it isn’t, but just as an hypothesis) the number could be variable.

    Well some of us take the position that it is genetic but should be addressed like a genetic disorder.

    Not celebrated by society nor suppressed like the 50s whereby they are more likely to marry and pass their genes.

    I don’t believe for one second that it isn’t related to genetics. I considered that theory possible before having to spend time around gay men. My experience closely mirrors that of the author where I was forced to face a reality that is much different than what is on TV and also what is assumed by Christian conservatives.

    Their brains are wired differently. It’s not merely a sexual difference. They don’t have male or female brains. They have an odd mix and you start to see patterns when you are around them like their fashion proclivities. For example I once told a gay that I didn’t look at what I put on and he thought it was a joke. He didn’t think anyone would actually just grab a shirt and put it on. Another told me that he drove 30 minutes to the mall for socks. How many straight men would drive to the mall for socks? They are gay 24/7. It isn’t just when they are going on a date. They don’t realize how gay they actually are compared to straight men. It’s really creepy. They can’t even order food without somehow being gay. They’ll order extra napkins or something weird. When talking to straight men they always out themselves. One “tell” is where they will pretend to like sports but will gossip about the player and not talk about the game. They will bring up Tom Brady’s wife and what she was wearing. You wouldn’t believe how quickly they f-ck it up around straight guys. They are hopeless and it is not because they were raped at an early age. I honestly wish I didn’t know any of this but I was around gays in the city due to business just like the author. I was far more optimistic during my isolated suburban days.

    • Replies: @FKA Max
    , @Dumbo
  198. Like Blacks in America, gays have been weaponized by Jews against traditional Americans

    Helped in no small part by the rank bigotry and ignorant generalizations with which this article–authored by, presumably, a “traditional American”– bristles.

    “Bug chasers?” Give me a break.

    Listen, author, white solidarity is the ONLY thing that matters. Period. You want to slice out a very talented segment of the white population–one that will always be with us? You are an idiot. Why not white Catholics and Mormons, too? And white liberals, of course, and single white women? And Christian Zionists? And white atheists? And all the other non-traditional white Americans?

    • Replies: @RockaBoatus
  199. Dually says:

    Homosexuality should be a local issue. Why are the morals of the Castro District in California imposed on distant, religiously pious, parts of the country? This issue is neither country-wide, nor universal – yet is improperly treated as such.

    The same goes for womens’ rights and race. Different locales have different standards. Why are one locality’s standards inflicted upon all of the rest?

    The answer is: Purely local interpersonal conflicts are universalized by the Elite, in the interests of the Elite, to deprive all other Americans of their rights on the local level.

    This isn’t an “alt-right” issue – it’s a common sense issue.

  200. Shamu says:
    @Twin Ruler

    All pederasts know that. It’s the reason they, in every language, slur ‘the breeders.’ They need breeders, but they also hate them as inferior. Queers freed to be themselves fully in any society immediately have a superiority complex. And non-queers who become pro-queer always hate those who are not pro-queer for being intellectually, morally, and spiritually backward.

    Proust, who knew gay Paris art and intellectual groups very well, saw gay males and female as two different, and only somewhat allied, ‘tribes. The queer tribal membership outweighed any other tie: nationality, religion, politics, everything was lesser than being queer. Therefore queer would aways be a subversive force in any community.

    There is no way to have any socieity that truly tolerates queerness and is healthy and worth fighting to defend.

  201. Shamu says:
    @Dumbo

    Like any other perversity or bad politics, queerness can be grown by propaganda.

  202. Don’t use the term ‘gay’. By doing so, you’re playing their game. Notice homos now turned ‘pride’ into a globo-homo thing.

    Call them homos or inversexuals.

    And don’t call it ‘anal sex’. There is no such thing. Sex is the reproductive act between man and woman. When a penis goes up the anus, it may resemble sex but is not. Anus is not a sexual organ.
    Call it homo fecal penetration or bung-donging.

    • Replies: @RockaBoatus
  203. anon[165] • Disclaimer says:
    @John Johnson

    Well I hope he is given time to reach puberty, you never know he may change his mind about wearing tiaras and why can’t boys be janegirls like a girl can be a tom boy? He may grow out of it given time and people not encouraging him to explore himself and his “gayness”. Many girls are tomboys but know they are girls. Maybe he needs to know that he is a boy, regardless of his tiara. Don’t give up hope.

  204. @folkvangr

    folkwanker’s HIV meds are putting him in a bitchy mood today

    • Replies: @folkvangr
  205. Pratisara says:
    @John Johnson

    >>Gay people do breed. It’s called being closeted.

    Ah ok – thanks. Good point.

    That means that acceptance of this will stop the gene from being passed down because now that’s in the open, there’s no pressure to procreate under duress. So acceptance of this actually brings it’s demise.

    • Replies: @John Johnson
  206. anongi says:

    And maybe wearing a tiara has nothing to do with “being” a girl, maybe buy him a fancy kings crown and see if he likes it better 🙂

  207. @Hulkamania

    Why are vicious bigots SO moronic? I have NEVER defended US imperialism-exactly the opposite, but no doubt you practise the Big Lie policy. The pederast thing is slimy slander-I say you fuck donkeys. Care to disprove it? See, it’s so easy. Pederasty, whether straight or queer, male victims or females, is, in my opinion, an abomination. Is that clear enough for you?

  208. anarchyst says:
    @Swaytonious

    It’s not about “fairness” but about “what is good for the goose is good for the gander”. I would be willing to compromise. Fully laicized priests who entered the priesthood as single men would be required to remain as such. Allowing those with already established families (as is done with Episcopalian converts to Catholicism) to enter the priesthood could be a positive.
    Best regards,

  209. @Passing By

    At least your parents managed to inculcate a predilection for judgmentalism and hatred in you.

    • Replies: @Passing By
  210. @Doug Ryler

    That time already-I only just finished lunch. Why don’t you just live your life, and leave others unlike you, alone?

  211. @SafeNow

    I can very much relate to your lack of dancing talent. I will be 72 years old this coming June and I did NOT have any dancing talent whatsoever, except for the “slow” dancing. In between marriages, I was dating this very nice substitute teacher and could she dance! It didn’t matter what kind of music was being played – rock, country, square dancing or even line dancing – she could dance to anything. Don’t think that I felt like an idiot when I was with her.

    Now that I’m “older,” I just listen to the music and appreciate the talents of the musicians, whether the older “hard rock” or the older country & western or classical pipe organ music. Cheers!

    • Thanks: SafeNow
  212. @John Johnson

    But the Jews do find the fire and brimstone preaches to be strange.

    I have always wondered why Jews have this feast known as “Purim”, based on one of the latest and questionable books of the Bible, the feast that actually commemorates the mass slaughter of non-Jews who didn’t yet do anything wrong (but COULD), and unlike in Exodus slaughter not by the act of God too, and yet the same Jews neither commemorate the destruction of Sodom (where, as we remember, not ONE person lived who did not sinned: all were already guilty, and died by the hand of God too: THE ACT OF PERFECT JUSTICE then), nor Jahwe’s intervention in their war with sodomite-like Benjaminites (a rather hushed episode from the Book of Judges), where at the end Jews actually take some effort in order to replenish bad Benjaminites again (a deed tantamount to giving a hand to Sodomites, actually).

    I came to conclusion that maybe rabbinic Jews do not worship Jahwe anymore, whose name they refuse to pronounce anyway, on surface judging themselves thus creatures unworthy of NOT trying to make no mistake. It is possible that such no-Jahwe worshippers existed among Jews even earlier. Judging by names, they worship some Adonai, who sounds much like Adonis, a god of nearby Phoenicia/Lebanon, and who surely would look at Sodom much more favourably, the cursed city being a place of Purim-like Dionysian celebrations as well.

    Incidentally, Christians do not celebrate the destruction of Sodom too. Well, Sodom certainly raises difficult theological questions… if God is(are) Trinity, did Jesus actually kill Sodomites? Later Jesus came to everyone – how can then the eternal God CHANGE?
    That could be rather inconvenient too as it would mean that there are sins which will be never forgiven, which again would mean that THERE IS NO HOPE for some!
    “There is no hope” – it would be hard to find any message more un-Christian, actually..!

    • Replies: @John Johnson
  213. @Priss Factor

    I understand where you’re coming from. However, I’ve chosen to use the term “gay” in the parlance of today’s culture and way of speaking. It still conveys the group I’m referring to without having to employ epithets or scorn. I use the term “homosexual” in more or less a clinical way to describe them.

    I suppose I could use the expression “sodomite” or other terms of derision, but this would simply irritate many of my readers which would likely cause them to miss more important issues raised in the article. The minute a writer employs incendiary expressions, their target audience is automatically turned off (at least in most instances). Enough of what I write about is controversial, and it makes little sense to add more fuel to the fire when there are no reasons to do so.

    I’d rather use neutral or common terms that everyone understands rather than those that will do nothing more than irritate the reader.

    Does this make me guilty of using the ‘terminology assigned to us by our conquerors’? Yes, I suppose so. But perhaps the better question is: How well do I wish to communicate to my readers? Am I able to still convey my thoughts without having to resort to insults? How will it benefit the points I’m trying to convey by using what many people view as degrading and vulgar language?

    • Replies: @Priss Factor
  214. @Priss Factor

    Thank you for the link to the townhall.com page. I read the entire article. I keep telling my girlfriend, who watches these “crime shows” on TV that what she sees on TV is just “the tip of the ice berg” as to what REALLY goes on in our country!

    Thanks again.

  215. Good for you to mention the Jewish Factor.

    Jewish Power made degenerates like this into cultural, ‘moral’, and even ‘spiritual’ commissar over you. Why is this tranny better than any woman? Because he has a DESIGNER ‘vagina’. (I suppose we should favor designer rubber steaks over real steaks.)

    What do Jews, homos, and blacks have in common? They are the most shameless.

    Maybe the good, moral, and decent people should be shameless in their virtues against those who are shameless in their vices.

    • Agree: anonymouseperson
  216. FKA Max says: • Website
    @John Johnson

    Great insightful comment!

    Their brains are wired differently. It’s not merely a sexual difference. They don’t have male or female brains. […] They are hopeless and it is not because they were raped at an early age.

    I might have a brain similar to that, but I’m not sexually attracted to men, but when I was younger (around age 7) our female, super-hot Mexican au pair (about age 20 at the time) made out with me, and I really enjoyed that and might have even initiated it (I can’t remember all the details). I have had several of these types of encounters with older women when I was prepubescent, who seemed to be magnetized and highly sexually attracted to me. But I didn’t lose my actual virginity until I was 20 years of age with a same-aged girlfriend, so I’m not “hypersexual”, actually quite the opposite, because I’m a hypochondriac and afraid of STDs, etc. I always have been attracted to older women (I have been married for almost 14 years to a woman 27 years my senior, but our relationship has been platonic for almost 8 years now). Many of my family and friends thought that I must be gay when I grew up, because I mostly wasn’t interest in girls my age or younger, and because I was thinking and behaving so differently than other males. But I was always accepted by other males, despite my weirdness, due to me being tall (6′ 3″), extremely athletically talented, etc.

    I might have an Emmanuel Macron https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emmanuel_Macron type of brain/gene — I have Huguenot https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Huguenots ancestry — that is neither a homosexual brain nor a typical male brain:

    A Bit of an Age Gap: Who’s Attracted to People Who are Much Older or Much Younger than them?
    by Dr Edward Dutton: The Jolly Heretic



    Video Link

    They will bring up Tom Brady’s wife and what she was wearing. You wouldn’t believe how quickly they f-ck it up around straight guys.

    This passage brought back memories, since I had a major high school crush on Gisele, despite her *only* being 3 years my senior hahahaha 😉

    Gisele Bündchen – Heart of Glass (Official Video) ft. Bob Sinclar

    • Replies: @Automatic Slim
    , @SBaker
  217. @mulga mumblebrain

    But he is correct. US imperialism in this day and age is all about forcing the LGBT++ agenda on the world by any available means and to get everyone to wave the rainbow flag and sashay in pride parades. So if you support the LGBT++ rights and all else that entails you are in fact supporting US imperialism.

    • Agree: Rich
  218. Whites used to have spiritual leadership and ethno-community leadership apart from political leadership. But church faded, and ethnic communities fell by the wayside. The only thing left was political leadership, but politicians are essentially whores, and the US system was geared to make politicians serve donors and elites than the voters.

    White people need to develop leadership and activism outside politics.

    Whites looked to white political elites, and these people ceded power to fast-rising Jews with control over finance and media. Thus, whites permitted Jews to do as they please, and Jews did this: They made this creature into cultural commissar over America.

    • Replies: @RockaBoatus
  219. SBaker says:
    @Twin Ruler

    The nasty facts bearing the ugliness that Hollywood and big media hate. The multi-billion dollar issue is the adverse effects of male homosexual derangement syndrome on public health and the children that are abused by the NAMBLA members hiding in the closet. Male homosexuals have the highest incidence of HIV/AIDS, syphilis, drug-resistant gonorrhea, entamoeba histolytica, chlamydia, herpes simplex II, Chancroid, Drug Resistant TB, Hepatitis A, Hepatitis B, Hepatitis non A & B, just to name a few. Male queers constitute today’s Typhoid Larrys. It is not the pretty innocent picture presented by Hollywood and the media for consumption by the ignorant.

  220. @Another Polish Perspective

    That could be rather inconvenient too as it would mean that there are sins which will be never forgiven, which again would mean that THERE IS NO HOPE for some!
    “There is no hope” – it would be hard to find any message more un-Christian, actually..!

    It is indeed an un-Christian message and it is unfortunate.

    I don’t have a good answer here. But if homosexuality is inborn then we are making things worse by depicting Christian parents as doing something wrong. If we lock down society and ban homosexuality then it is more likely that they will marry and pass their genes.

    Psychopathy has a similar problem. If some people aren’t born with moral capacity then it isn’t as simple as teaching them morals. But my guess is that there is actually more hope for psychopaths than homosexuals.

    I don’t think Christian fundamentalism works very well. You have to rule out a lot of nature that doesn’t work well with absolutes. I’ve known quite a few Evangelicals and a lot of them had an anxious temperament. The belief system didn’t seem to be serving them on a personal level. They are practically forced to accept race denial which is a burden in itself. I’ve also been around Catholics and they are much better in temperament even if some of their beliefs aren’t agreeable with protestants.

    • Agree: FKA Max
  221. SBaker says:
    @Tony

    Typical retort by the twisted logic of a pervert. Is this like the child who becomes “homophobic” after he was molested by a Mr. Harvey Milk? To normal people; the word is disgust with deviant behavior whether it pertains to queer coprophilia, same-sex relations with children, animals, or the dead. This sickness grows more bold in demanding that others, not just accept, but exalt said behavior as normal. If there is any concern with public health, then let it be understood that male homosexuals are the #1 vector for the spread of infectious diseases among humans and are an unnecessary public health threat costing the system billions.

    • Agree: Rich
    • Replies: @mulga mumblebrain
  222. @Vito Klein

    “Helped in no small part by the rank bigotry and ignorant generalizations with which this article” – You accuse me of “rank bigotry” and “ignorant generalizations” and even call me “an idiot,” but that’s not the same as refuting what I have written. Obviously, I have touched a nerve, and you’ve responded on an emotional level.

    “Bug chasers?” Give me a break” – This is precisely the expression that homosexuals who are into this sort of deviancy call it. It’s their term, not mine. Check out the video in my article which documents this.

    “Listen, author, white solidarity is the ONLY thing that matters. Period” – Oh, really? So, the JQ is not an important issue that we need to address? How about non-White immigration? How about Black crime and dysfunction? How about America’s Fentanyl crisis which disproportionately impacts Whites? How about the entire Globo-Homo system that has enslaved the West? How about our electoral system? How about secession?

    “White solidarity” is definitely an important matter, but part of reaching that solidarity is recognizing those divisive groups among our own people who would do everything in their power to prevent White racial unity. That group, among others that are predominately White would be the homosexual communities in America. If you haven’t realized by now how diligently they have worked against the traditional family and family values for the past 60 years, then you need to come out from under your rock and see things as they truly are.

    “You want to slice out a very talented segment of the white population–one that will always be with us?” – Very talented in what exactly? Grooming our young boys? Coercing the APA to change its definition of homosexuality? Parading naked in the streets for all to see under the banner of ‘Gay Pride’? Perhaps their real talent lies in spreading deadly STD’s to each other during their group ‘bareback’ orgies? Or maybe it’s in getting more government funds and goodies for their cause – a ‘lifestyle’ we all have to endlessly pay for?

    I have singled them out in this article because they have singled out the American family for decades in seeking to undermine, demoralize and ridicule all that is decent and good. Like Jews, they wish to portray themselves as perpetual ‘victims’ when, in fact, they are the victimizers and disrupters of a once cohesive and sane society.

    I don’t think you read my article too carefully. Do you recall the following words from it?

    “And while there may be individual homosexuals who can add value and benefit to society (often seen in the arts), as a group committed to sexual deviancy, they are unable to do so” . . . “This doesn’t mean they should be persecuted solely because they are gay, but only that campaigns to normalize and promote homosexuality should be outlawed. Gays who are “closeted” and who keep their sexual proclivities private should be left alone.”

    “Why not white Catholics and Mormons, too?” – Last I checked, traditionalist Catholics and Mormons weren’t trying to tell our children how wonderful man-on-man sex is. I haven’t seen any Catholics or Mormons publicly parading naked and attired in strange leather outfits in front of children for all to see. Catholics and Mormons haven’t asked nor demanded special rights for themselves, but homosexuals sure have. While Catholics and Protestant Christians are constantly ridiculed and vilified in the media and in Hollywood, homosexuals are the darlings of Hollywood’s elite.

    You’ve got your head screwed on wrong.

    • Agree: SBaker
  223. Anon[185] • Disclaimer says:

    The powers-that-be are pushing the surge in homosexuality by promoting free internet porn (monkey see, monkey do), and using the entertainment media and academia to normalize it via euphemism. They are using their marketing powers to make it the one “cool’ social archerype whites can do and not be castigated for. This promotion is on purpose and has a demographic aim.

  224. HT says:

    Before the degenerate Jews wrecked our culture, we were mostly a soft Christian theocracy with states keeping the perverts under control. Now the Jews have used the courts and government to destroy the Christian culture and you see how that looks today. To clean this mess up now, you would literally need a Hitler type to fix it and do what needs to be done. The Jew power structure knows it too and have made sure that is never going to happen.

    • Replies: @Vito Klein
  225. @mulga mumblebrain

    I have NEVER defended US imperialism

    You constantly carry water for the American empire here by repeating American “climate catastrophy” propaganda and defending American imperial moralism. That is why I referred to you as a “useless idiot,” too subhuman and low IQ to even rise to the position of useful idiot.

    • Replies: @mulga mumblebrain
  226. @Pratisara

    Gay people do breed. It’s called being closeted.

    That means that acceptance of this will stop the gene from being passed down because now that’s in the open, there’s no pressure to procreate under duress. So acceptance of this actually brings it’s demise.

    If it is indeed a recessive gene this could in fact be true.

    I suspect there is a volatile combination of gay genes/risk-seeking behavior that led to the HIV outbreak. SF probably attracted the worst of the worst. They unreserved gays that seek group sex and head out to the coastal liberal cities.

    This would also mean that HIV killed off some of the worst combinations.

    Ironically the left could actually cause the decline of homosexuality by mainstreaming it. But I’m concerned there are more church gays than we want to believe. They blend in by depicting themselves as being righteous and having low sexuality in general. Every mainstream church has a fag like Chrisley. They have kids to help them with the cover and provide the “too busy” excuse.

  227. There are two issues:

    1. public policy

    2. moral coding

    1. As public policy my objection is to anything that suggests that the dynamics of this conduct inhabits any place for promotion. It does not contribute anything unique or practical that warrants special privileging, as the dynamic of marriage between a man and woman clearly does in providing for greater community. And that role is one that invites public debate and scrutiny. We are discussing behavior, not hair color.

    A policy of none of the public personal, what consenting humans do do in and among themselves is essentially none of my business. And while the exception might be the age of consent (minors or mental capacity) — I understand that this conduct is one of choice and expression and as such — I can only wince and shutter.

    2. Moral coding as my lean tends to be along the lines of scripture — it is conduct that I cannot abide or approve. I may approve of the person, be friends with, laugh with, have a meal in public settings, etc. But I cannot and will not condone the conduct and as much as they have the right to said individual choice to embrace, I have as much right to reject on its face.

    There are boundaries that people of faith and faith and practice cannot cross and in my view, that is one such bridge of practice that must remain off limits. Neither my care, love or support of another person demands my assent the conduct is appropriate or assented to by any christian ethos handed down from the founders. I have people who I deeply care about involved in this conduct but my love and care for them and about them does not require my approval.

    Oprah is correct Jesus is love — however, Jesus loves all, based on my limited understanding of scripture, including when the objects of his love engage in misguided behavior.

    ————————————-

    “That time already-I only just finished lunch. Why don’t you just live your life, and leave others unlike you, alone?”

    If you advocate for conduct that is to be normalized in the public square, then you invite public discussion. If there is a press on what is to be taught in the classroom, then something as profound as human relations invites a public discussion. Same relational conduct is terminal — it provides no unique benefit to societal longevity.

    And before we head down that long winding road to nonsense —- absolutely. Even coupling of men and women who do not have children provide benefit as they represent the premier, the only model for relationships that actually bears fruit back to the community at large.

  228. @John Johnson

    The most plausible explanation is that it is caused by hormone problems in gestation. This is believed to be the reason why likelihood of a child being homosexual increases with each male born to the same woman This is referred to as the fraternal birth order effect (FBOE). A second son is more likely to be homo than a first son, a third son is more likely to be homo than a second son, and so on. The belief is that the mother becomes desensitized to the testosterone or something during her pregnancies, so subsequent sons either do not get as much testosterone or are less sensitive to it, so they are more likely to turn out effeminate and gay.

    These hormone issues may be genetic, but I do not know that the homosexual condition itself is genetic. The above phenomenon of FBOE wouldn’t make much sense if it were simply genetic.

  229. folkvangr says:
    @fredyetagain aka superhonky

    There is nothing wrong about being in a “bitchy mood”. As a matter of fact this is the only right mood everyone should be in. I’ll give just a few reasons, but you are most welcome to contribute to my BLOG (“Bitchy List Of Grievances”):
    – fake country (transparent borders!)
    – fake president (clownish imposter!)
    – fake medicine (gene altering mistery juice mandated as vaccine!)
    – fake men and fake women (castrated human species that do not occur in Nature!)
    – fake education (no SAT scores required for colleges and up!)
    – fake media (commie propaganda instead of news!)

  230. folkvangr says:
    @Currahee

    Pls. see my reply to @fredyetagain aka superhonky

  231. folkvangr says:
    @Bro43rd

    You are wrong. I am just a bit disappointed about where this site is going. Just skimming the word salad from that piece of nothing… Feels like going to bed with your wife and then waking up next to a stray dog from a landfill. Your first move would be taking a shower, right? So, the verbal outbust works the same way.lol

    • Replies: @RockaBoatus
    , @Syd Walker
  232. @RockaBoatus

    There are alternatives:

    Butt-Bang-Boy. Bung-donger. Rump-Humper. Tooter. Fruiter. Whoopie-dooper.

  233. @RestiveUs

    I recall finding girls pretty at 5 years old. Being straight has always felt innate and I can only imagine being gay is too.

    Some claim that being gay is the result of sexual abuse. I am very skeptical. Does sexual abuse make a man like Barbara Streisand and have an eye for interior design too?

    Some years ago I read David Duke’s “My Awakening.” Duke has a section discussing homosexuality. He presents evidence that being gay is the result of an imbalance in the rush of hormones that a fetus receives fairly early in the gestation period, the same rush of hormones that ultimately determine whether a baby develops as a girl or a boy. For gays, there is either an excess of estrogen or testosterone in the mix, with the former turning a baby boy into a gay male, and the latter turning a baby girl into a lesbian. Essentially gay men are males with hybrid brains that lean female and lesbians are gay women with hybrid brains that lean male.

    I have met only two women in my life with contractors licenses. Both were lesbians. Did sexual abuse make them good at construction? If so, why not interior design?

    • Replies: @Happy Tapir
    , @HbutnotG
  234. The part about Talmudist Jews using fags to destroy the moral fabric of Christian America has always been obvious to me. Yet many or most evangelicals can’t connect the dots.

  235. @Priss Factor

    The woman in the Twitter video (Rep. Sandra Feist from Minnesota) has all the physical insignia of her ‘woke’ insanity on full display. The short, cropped hair (burgundy in color) and the huge eyeglasses tell anyone with an ounce of discernment that she’s a radical feminist on a mission. She probably has to restrain herself somewhat because of her office. Otherwise, she’d probably proudly be exposing her piercings and multiple tattoos to everyone. These gals are attention whores to the max.

    By the way, no female gets up in the morning and ‘accidentally’ makes herself look like this. No, she’s knowingly and willfully on display and telling us something about herself. She’s signaling to others who and what she’s about. Any normal or sane man who enters the presence of these kind of women ought to turn tail and run like hell!

    “Not all students who menstruate are female” – Of course, if anyone were to press her for proof that males or Transgenders menstruate, she wouldn’t be able to prove it. She certainly couldn’t prove her statements scientifically. What book on human biology would back up her statement? Yet no one calls her out. No outrage. No ridicule. Just silence. They all just go along with the lies and deceptions like the sheep they are. No one in their right mind takes the woman’s words seriously, but they all have to pretend that she’s saying something meaningful.

    Years ago, when someone publicly stated such nonsense or if they claimed to be someone or something they were obviously not, they’d place them in a strait-jacket for their own good or try to get them immediate psychological help. Not so today. Today we ‘celebrate’ them and nod agreeably as if they are dispensing wisdom and deep insight.

    The enormous lies we live under staggers the mind when we stop to think about it.

  236. Timmy75 says: • Website
    @folkvangr

    The lady doth protest too much, methinks. The loudest voice in the church choir is usually that of the recently converted heathen.

  237. @folkvangr

    Wait a minute, aren’t you the guy in comment #26 who announced he was leaving this site because you were so disgusted by my article and others you didn’t like? Didn’t you write the following?

    “This is my 300th post on this website and I am leaving it. My heartfelt thanks to every likeminded person who responded to my comments and those who nourished my curiosity and helped me with my struggle to get a grip on complex issues. I guess I have reached a point where I am not satisfied anymore with discussing those issues in the way they are handled here . . . Anyway. It’s been a rough journey but I’ve enjoyed it.”

    Man, that was short lived! But here you are back again with all the accompanying frustration and moral outrage. Hopefully, in your return you can actually deal with issues you may not personally agree with in a more rational and less emotive manner. We can only hope.

    • Replies: @folkvangr
  238. @RVIDXR

    I never saw the leaked video of Greg Johnson you refer to. Could you link to it or describe it? I do agree he can be quite hysterical.

    • Replies: @RVIDXR
  239. @Mario Partisan

    I believe this theory about hormones. Have you ever noticed that in many pairs of identical twins, one is gay and the other not? I think this has been true in more pairs of twins than not, of those I’ve encountered! What’s the single different thing about genetically identical twins? Their positions in the womb. Many times one twin will starve the other and they will be different sizes at birth. Likely one commonly steals the hormones from the other, resulting in the difference in sexual orientation.
    If that’s true, I wonder what accounts for pedophilia? Any theories on that?
    It was post pubescent girls you found pretty at five, right? I remember finding teenage boys attractive when I was little, but not other prepubescent boys.

  240. @HT

    Everyone forgets, when Christians ran the country, we abolished slavery and were tolerant toward gays individually. The culture was better and healthier then, and that includes gay culture.

    Where I grew up in the 70s there was a gay couple who owned a farm. Everyone in town knew they were gay, but it wasn’t a thing. I remember my father mentioning once that they were “a little funny,” but he did business with them and treated them like everyone else. One day, one of the men’s sister and brother-in-law were killed in a car crash leaving two small children orphans. They immediately went to live with Uncles Bob and Gary, And no one in town could imagine they would go anywhere else. But if you polled the people in that small Midwestern town whether they approved or disapproved of gays having the legal right to adopt small children, the results would likely be overwhelming disapproval. That’s the kind of tolerance that is easily overlooked but it’s the best kind.

    Stop making everything political. Let people just live life. White nationalists and gays should both just leave the question alone. This article sucks.

    • Agree: Thor Walhovd
    • Disagree: Hulkamania
    • Replies: @RockaBoatus
    , @Hulkamania
  241. Homosexuals and Jews. Partners in crime. Their victim? Traditional white society and culture.

  242. @folkvangr

    It must be time for an article about Short People who Are Tolerant (SPATs).

    Must the rest of us tolerate them just because they are tolerant?

    Do they have a right to their own state?

    What about short-tempered short people? Aren’t they intolerable?

    Next we could move on to the vexacious topic of tall people.

    Can any of them be trusted? Is it safe to breed with them?

    If a short person of Viking ancestry falls pregnant to a tall Pygmy, should we tolerate people who discuss the probable height of the baby?

    Also, why is there so much to discuss? Who’s to blame? Do we hate them enough already?

    I’ll be very interested in everyone’s opinions about this. Thank goodness we all make the best possible use of this valuable (and rare) opportunity for uncensored discussion.

    • Replies: @folkvangr
  243. People like Kameny wanted toleration. The wanted lives free from police raids, blackmail, shake downs, getting fired, and violence; they wanted what they called Gay Pride. Somehow over half a century Gay Pride morphed into the demand for absolute equality—meaning inheritance rights, marriage, kids, and preferential employment. You’ve come a long way baby.
    But Rockaboatus gets some things wrong:
    1) NAMBLA did march in the early days but it was the paleolithic separatist lesbians who said, ‘sex with a minor was an act of rape’ who refused to join the parade if NAMBLA was included.
    2) It is not possible to groom a straight kid; you cannot turn anyone gay. It is possible to coax a straight into homosexual behaviour with money or favours but they will bolt at the first opportunity. Rather it has been the case in grooming that homosexual ‘talent scouts’ spot gay potential in youngsters whom they immediately recognise with their gaydar. Catholic priests spot the attractive sissies as well as the little show offs who want to be altar boys. Teachers and students who are gay form a bond of understanding with the older fag becoming a role model and a guidance counselor. Orphanages and adoption agencies also come into play. Anyway, they don’t breed, and they die young yet the world is constantly replenished with queers—sometimes to the point of overflowing.
    3) Yes, the natural purpose of the anus and the rectum is the elimination of crap, and this is why certain homosexuals do not call it an asspussy or a mangina but insist it is the shithole. So the pleasure derived from thrusting in and out with large objects (the so called ass gasm) is simply the amplification of this pleasure of elimination. Yet this NOT a totally gay activity; some straight men need to get cornholed or pegged to achieve orgasm.
    It also has to be noted with the widespread introduction of modern plumbing, chemical enemas, and douche bags, crap has been mostly eliminated from anal activity.
    4) I don’t believe homosexuals are quite the reservoir of filth and death described in the article. Certainly the Stonewall Generation were, but today it is Black women who carry the plague flag of HIV.
    5) It would not be in the long term interest of gays to destroy the nuclear family; they cannot survive without it. I would say that straights themselves are destroying the family unit through industrial pollution, sexual dysfunction, promiscuity, refusal to pair bond and, of course, procreate.

    • Replies: @RockaBoatus
  244. Phibbs says:

    The author claims that 5% of the population is gay men. That is not true. Gay people (lesbians & gay men) comprise about 5% of the population. Also, lesbians are much less promiscuous than gay men. They tend to be faithful to their partners. This is not to say that lesbianism is acceptable morally. It just means they don’t spread diseases.

    • Replies: @RockaBoatus
  245. West Hollywood is the trashiest, most vulgar gay community in the USA, in part because it is where most of the porn is made. The stereotypes and unsubstantiated assertions in the article are legion, and the description of disgusting sexual acts made this faggot literally want to vomit.

    It’s very easy to focus on extreme bi-coastal bubble and mass media examples of gay folk, and makes about as much sense as holding up a couple hours of MSNBC or an episode of The View as being representative of US culture.

    I have no desire to change minds on this topic, and learned that debating with insecure meathead jocks was a waste of time way back in the 7th grade. Just like debating Russiagate or the Scamdemic with a Clintonite cult member is a waste of time.

    Better just to praise God every day and be grateful for each moment among my brothers and sisters and try to live in peace and humility. And following the light of Brother Francis, willingly embracing humiliation, exclusion and hate in this sick, dying culture. This life is fleeting and will not last, but Christ is eternal.

    God Bless each and every one of you, especially the haters and insecure, mind-in-the-gutter jocks on this comment thread. Amen.

  246. folkvangr says:
    @RockaBoatus

    What’s wrong with the moral outrage? Isn’t that because of lack of it that we as a nation are hitting a new low every single day? Or are we too demoralized to even think we are capable of it? I’m back to see if I am right in my assumptions.

    • Replies: @RockaBoatus
  247. FKA Max says: • Website
    @RVIDXR

    So what you laid out may be adaptive to you and your genetic kin but it’s not necessarily adaptive to mine, it’s all subjective depend[e]nt on the group and the environment they currently exist in.

    Fair points, but I think you engage in a bit of “cultural relativism” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cultural_relativism with your comment, since Northwestern Europe, arguably, has been selecting for traits that are “adaptive to [me] and [my] genetic kin” for about the last 1500 years — as Joseph Henrich https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_WEIRDest_People_in_the_World and Charles Murray https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_Accomplishment have documented — and quite successfully so “combination of high cooperation capacity coupled with decent or even high IQ […] seems to be the sweet spot in terms of evolutionary fitness and dominancehttps://www.unz.com/jtaylor/how-the-races-got-that-way/?showcomments#comment-5711508 (Click [MORE] button for details):

    [MORE]

    creation of a “mutant” gene pool in Northwestern Europe over the last circa 1500 years, that combines high intelligence with high trust/agreeableness/cooperation and high creativity/curiosity ( lightly-pigmented eyes also play an important role in this https://www.unz.com/jthompson/isteve-metrics/?showcomments#comment-1823832 ) and in turn this “transformation or even “transmutation” of the Western European gene pool (e.g. Faustian Spirit, etc.) set off a process and triggered a “domino effect” that caused/resulted in the Renaissance, then Reformation, Industrial Revolution, etc., and is still ongoing today”

    https://www.unz.com/jtaylor/how-the-races-got-that-way/?showcomments#comment-5708173

    in the past the Orthodx Church wasn’t too concerned about banning cousin marriage (which is highly dysgenic) […] Their results showed a clear correlation between the length of time that the Western Church had been active in a geographic region, the decline of kinship structures, and the prevalence of characteristics such as analytical thinking, independence and individualism.

    https://www.unz.com/mwhitney/why-do-americans-hate-putin/?showcomments#comment-5673876

    • Replies: @RVIDXR
  248. HbutnotG says:
    @Mario Partisan

    Being hobo has nothing to do with sexual abuse. Quit getting sex ed from the TV where everybody’s life is supposed to be some lurid x-rated novel. .

    • Agree: Thor Walhovd
  249. folkvangr says:
    @Syd Walker

    Sexually Transmitted Diseases (STDs) have been rising among gay and bisexual men, with increases in syphilis being seen across the country.
    https://www.cdc.gov/msmhealth/STD.htm

    Shigella Infection Among Gay, Bisexual, and Other Men Who Have Sex with Men (MSM)

    https://www.cdc.gov/shigella/msm.html

    Enteric diseases of homosexual men

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6765390/

    Bacterial sexually transmitted infections in gay, lesbian, and bisexual adolescents

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16044392/

    Cluster of drug-resistant gut bacteria found in gay men

    https://newsroom.uw.edu/news/cluster-drug-resistant-gut-bacteria-found-gay-men

    Of course, the deviants cannot compete with cockroaches (150 viruses, bacteria and parasites), but they are working on it. AND, keep in mind, those are the ones who make your sandwiches and coffee.lol

    • Replies: @Syd Walker
  250. RVIDXR says:
    @Happy Tapir

    At the bottom of the article, it’s the second audio recording.

    skandinaviskfrihet.se/network-of-homosexuals-exposed-in-the-alt-right-with-recordings/

  251. @Happy Tapir

    Your observations about twins are interesting. I think differences in hormone exposure in utero is a good explanation for homosexuality, especially because it bypasses the natural selection objection inherent in any genetic origin. Gays rarely pass on their genes, but they are still with us because they are produced by straight mothers.

    Sorry if it sounds weird, but no, I didn’t mean post pubescent. I meant that I recall sitting in kindergarten class and thinking that one or two of my classmates were very pretty. And I know that I found those same ones to be pretty at 4th grade, 9th grade, and at graduation. Does that mean that I had any idea of what sex was in kindergarten? No. But it says that my brain was naturally tuned to find something attractive in select females at a very young age. Heterosexuality is innate. And so is being gay.

    You ask what explains pedophilia. Honestly I don’t know. But if I have to speculate, I think pedophiles are really just superficial sadists. They get off not on attraction, but on being able to harm someone who is defenseless, and they get off on the feeling of being powerful. Pedophilia is just a particular expression of a general sadistic personality.

    Ironically, the term pedophile is a misnomer. It literally means lover of children. Pedos are anything but that. Why did Epstein choose pedophilia as his go to form of blackmail? Because those who are willing to do that are willing to enable any sadistic policy the powers that be want to inact.

    • Replies: @Happy Tapir
  252. @folkvangr

    If you are looking for site of “likeminded”people you are asking to be bored.An echo chamber will shrink your brain and cause you to lose perspective.

    Any site that allows free speech will attract across section of humanity,including repetitious dimwits,vulgar reprobates and illiterati of every ilk,but if you harden your sensibilities you will find an equal number of inquisitive and well informed commenters on UR.

    There are those who are guilty of TUI or TWI and should forfeit their computers when they type drunk.They (we) can be mean.

    Nil desperandum carburundum illegitami!

    • Replies: @folkvangr
  253. @folkvangr

    Nothing wrong with moral outrage. But in making the repeated comments you did on this thread indicates your moral outrage is directed at the wrong people. It’s entirely misplaced.

    • Agree: bike-anarkist
  254. @Phibbs

    No, many of the surveys/articles I read estimated that among the overall population, gay males comprise less than 5%. Some estimate higher. The problem is that much of this is unreliable. It’s not as exact or ‘scientific’ as people might think. Much of it is guessing and general approximation. Because of shame or a desire to protect their privacy, many men will not admit to their particular sexual orientation.

    I studied much of this information about 30 years ago, and while the media claimed that gay men comprised about 10% of the overall population, the reality is that was more about 2% or 3%. I believe in accordance with prevailing social and sexual trends, it’s probably higher today.

    Yes, I agree that lesbians are probably more faithful to their partners than gay males. This is because men generally have a stronger sex drive than women. They probably don’t spread diseases as frequently and widely as gay men do (as you noted).

  255. @Thor Walhovd

    “The stereotypes and unsubstantiated assertions in the article are legion, and the description of disgusting sexual acts made this faggot literally want to vomit” – Well, apparently as a God-fearing “faggot” (your words, not mine), you really shouldn’t be surprised. Everything I stated in the article are very common features and sexual practices among gay men in their communities (mostly in big city Blue states). In more rural regions of the U.S., especially in the Bible belt, homosexuals may not be as overt and in-your-face with their deviancy.

    Oh sure, there’s going to be differences and not every gay man is going to conduct himself exactly the same as many of those in West Hollywood which as you stated “is the trashiest, most vulgar gay community in the USA.” I pointed this out at the very start of my article. But it does no good to deny that the things I wrote about are precisely very common experiences, sexual practices, and attitudes among vast numbers of homosexuals in America.

  256. Vomiting on Californian queens is safe & easy. Now do a Part 2 and drag out the dirty laundry of the Catholic Church. The Unz Review is too good a site for posting 80’s Anita Bryant reruns.

    • Replies: @RockaBoatus
  257. @folkvangr

    Yes, it’s terrifying.

    That’s why I always prefer to buy my sandwiches from stoned heterosexuals who show no signs at all of drug resistance. On white bread, naturally.

    • LOL: folkvangr
  258. Jomo Power Complex isn’t about freedom and tolerance.

    You can’t criticize Jewish Power, and you better bend over to globo-homo.

    To expose globo-homo, Jewish Power has to be named.

  259. @mulga mumblebrain

    Actually, they did nothing of the sort. My mother has very good gay friends, and one of them is a very likeable character. But he recognises wilfully that being gay makes him unfit to be a parent. As for my father, I’m not even positive that he’s all straight. I wasn’t raised to think ill or good, I formed my own opinion. Something that children stuck with same-sex “parents” are disallowed from doing. They are raised to believe that anomaly is normal. Homosexuality is not normal, it is an anomaly. Like I said, no one would give a sh*t about gays if they weren’t so proselytising. Regarding children, if denying deviants the opportunity to abuse them is “hateful”, then OK, I’m “hateful”.

    • Replies: @mulga mumblebrain
  260. Thomasina says:

    Rockaboatus – great article! Thanks.

  261. RVIDXR says:
    @FKA Max

    I’m not sure it’s relativism given culture is genetic and I’m speaking from the perspective of old American genetic stock, coming to live in the frontier was itself a genetic selection process. Admittedly that selection process was flawed since it also selected for people solely motivated by extreme religiosity that evolved into progressivism. That beings said I don’t want to live in a clone of Northwestern Europe with all the implications that brings with it, I want to live in dangerous freedom America and that is my genetic interest per my specific genotype, one that exists in virtually every ethnicity and race but with wildly varying degrees. Race doesn’t just magically go away because it’s a subgroup, there is differences, if it’s all relative then there’s a lot of explaining centuries of contradictory evidence that needs to be done.

    As for the quote about the Faustian Spirit still continuing to this day, what evidence is there of that in the West? There isn’t and the person who wrote that likely can’t explain why. Lots of pro White people implicitly claim that Europeans magically lose agency due to socializing and propaganda that, strangely, doesn’t work on everyone and that also happens to have a strong correlation for and against this being true with specific ethnicities. There’s two things at play here, probability of political views by race/ethnic group and selection pressure, what you quoted assumes selection pressure remains static, that evolution only goes in one direction and that general similarities in different environments produce virtually 100% homogeneity, none of which is true per the conflicting evidence.

    If all that were to be believed then things like the American Civil War and Reconstruction happening in a homogeneous ethnostate and Swede heavy Minnesota importing tons of somalis just like the homeland and countless other things that just so happen to match the exact behavior of racial animosity and fit a pattern of ethnic groups behaving a certain way are just random coincidences. It’s basically the same thing shitlibs do with blacks except instead of one race the human race, it’s one white race and all these measurable patterns of behavior between different ethnic groups and all of said groups beginning to degenerate at the same time right when the child survival rate went from a coin flip to nearly 100% is pure coincidence.

    There’s far too much evidence that there’s multiple European races with enough difference between them that, in practice, it’s not far removed from full blown racial differences as far as living in proximity is concerned with the resulting friction it creates. So too that the change in survival rates is responsible for the ever declining IQ, increases in genetic disorders and changes in political attitudes / indifference to degeneracy that all began with medical advances that made sure every single child survived to adulthood. Those two things neatly explain how things got to where they are today and it matches the exact timing that it began.

    If we didn’t have the industrial revolution or if we did and imposed some type of eugenics society would’ve presumably lasted a lot longer before degenerating because the build up of dysgenic genes in the population wouldn’t have happened so quickly otherwise. Unfortunately we just sped to late stage civilization thanks to a policy of deliberately breeding the weak and degenerate and artificially keeping them alive thus breaking any semblance of selection pressure.

    • Replies: @FKA Max
  262. @Vito Klein

    “Stop making everything political. Let people just live life. White nationalists and gays should both just leave the question alone” – Isn’t that something we should be asking of homosexuals and their militant groups who shove their deviancy in our collective faces every chance they get?

    It’s interesting how each socially and morally destructive group that stands against White racial solidarity (e.g., Jews, Blacks, Hispanic advocacy organizations, homosexuals and the entire LGBTQ crowd) all want White people to shut up and never even raise an eyebrow at what they have done to this once great nation? It’s always the White heterosexual male who must acquiesce to every radical group that comes along the primrose path. If we dare to protest, we’re “haters,” “homophobes,” “bigots,” “racists,” and people who are guilty of making “everything political.”

    Whites have tried to make peace with and accommodate every racial group and sexual deviancy imaginable. For once, I’d like it if they reciprocated, but they won’t and never will.

  263. @Trinity

    There is a profound difference in the essence and expression of a woman’s sex drive but I doubt that it is less than a man’s. A woman’s reproductive physiology is much more complex, of course,and her attitude about sex is understandably more nuanced and discriminating.

    No doubt men are more easily aroused but that doesn’t make their sex drive stronger,just quicker.

  264. @TheAntidoteToToxins

    “NAMBLA did march in the early days but it was the paleolithic separatist lesbians who said, ‘sex with a minor was an act of rape’ who refused to join the parade if NAMBLA was included” – Oh, I see. So, the homosexuals did not at all protest against NAMBLA until some vocal lesbians complained which proves the very point in my article: Gay men felt quite at home with NAMBLA being present in their street parades until they realized that their optics would work against them and tarnish their image.

    “It is not possible to groom a straight kid; you cannot turn anyone gay. It is possible to coax a straight into homosexual behaviour with money or favours but they will bolt at the first opportunity” – Not true. Homosexuals have a long history of trying to ‘convert’ and groom young boys whom they know are heterosexual. Even if they don’t think the young lad will turn out gay, few of them will pass up an opportunity to exploit young and often confused males. Sure, adult gay men may activate their ‘gaydars’ to find out which boy might more easily be groomed for their pleasure, but the presence of young heterosexual males doesn’t necessarily prevent them from making the attempt.

    And no, not every straight male will “bolt at the first opportunity.” Many will allow it to happen to them because they are scared, intimidated, confused, needing affection, or still trying to find out where they are sexually in terms of new experiences. This occurs in the same way young females are sexually molested by older adult males. Often, they’re too afraid to protest or say anything, and so they let it happen.

    “Yes, the natural purpose of the anus and the rectum is the elimination of crap, and this is why certain homosexuals do not call it an asspussy or a mangina but insist it is the shithole” – Isn’t that nice? Homosexuals even use vulgar and degrading expressions to describe their own sex acts. How can they not? After all, there’s nothing uplifting about playing around in shit. Suits them well, I would say.

    “Yet this NOT a totally gay activity; some straight men need to get cornholed or pegged to achieve orgasm” – True, some heterosexual men engage in this kind of sex too. But what does that prove other than heterosexuals males can also be just as degrading and deviant as homosexual males?

    “It would not be in the long term interest of gays to destroy the nuclear family; they cannot survive without it” – True, but that’s precisely what they seek to do. Their actions collectively speak louder than their words. They have a long history of trying to undermine traditional marriage and the traditional family unit as I have explained in my article. Most homosexuals, I doubt, even think about the moral and societal consequences of their ‘lifestyle.’

    “I would say that straights themselves are destroying the family unit through industrial pollution, sexual dysfunction, promiscuity, refusal to pair bond and, of course, procreate” – Perhaps so, but these same straight males don’t have an agenda to destroy the family and to convert the entire nation to some strange sexual deviancy as homosexuals do. The Bolshevik Left has used militant homosexuals and their lesbian and Transgender cohorts to uproot all decency throughout the West, and there is little doubt that it has negatively impacted heterosexual Whites as well. This is what happens when people lose their way and rebel against the natural order of things.

    • Agree: SBaker
    • Troll: mulga mumblebrain
  265. @FKA Max

    So you do see! All too well. My advice, don’t spend so much time trying to figure out why they are… We don’t know why people are necrophiliacs… (Necrophilia is just another kink in queer culture… Philias within philias) is there a gene for that? Does that have an evolutionary advantage?
    More time on seeing them for what they are… and what they do.

    • Replies: @FKA Max
  266. Tolerate, then celebrate and finally participate. The arc of Sodom.

  267. Dumbo says:
    @John Johnson

    I don’t know. I think some homosexuals are more feminine and interested in female stuff (clothes, gossip, etc) but many others, not. Many have more male interests like politics, science etc. Your namesake Greg Johnson for instance, he doesn’t strike me as someone very interested in shoes.

    But they do have sexual proclivities which are strange, and they are much more into sexual stuff than heterosexuals. Things like weekend orgies, having random sex with strangers in saunas, stuff like that.

    The ones I met were not very feminine (well, some were, but I think this is more an affectation, a signal to other gays), and had more or less “male” interests (news, science, politics, etc – not female stuff). The more telling sign was that they had a lot of different partners, and were more prone to depression, family problems, social issues, brusque mood changes. At least two of them were on strong medication for mental illness or depression.

    • Replies: @John Johnson
  268. Gay dude says:

    All of you men have been in female bodies in previous lives. Reincarnation is a fact. And all those female lives are recorded in your DNA. You are essentially women in mwn’s bodies. I urge you to accept your transgenderism and your own gay divinity.

  269. They know that most Americans might be able to tolerate two adult males engaging in sex, but this would not be the same sentiment when it comes to man-boy sexual relations.

    Sodomites are patently engaged in a campaign to gain free access to boys in the name of “tolerance”. And “hate crime” laws currently in the works will make sure there are no objectors.

    The US is a kakistocracy ruled by a coalition of the worst elements of society, with Christ-killers at the very top. Accordingly, realists should expect only the worst from American society.

  270. FKA Max says: • Website
    @RVIDXR

    I’m not sure it’s relativism given culture is genetic and I’m speaking from the perspective of old American genetic stock, coming to live in the frontier was itself a genetic selection process. Admittedly that selection process was flawed since it also selected for people solely motivated by extreme religiosity that evolved into progressivism.

    Yes, America selected for an even higher dopamine gene pool than Northwestern Europe, by being a refuge for those who fled religious persecution in Europe. These religious believers likely had higher average levels of brain dopamine and therefore higher occurrences of apophenia among them, i.e. out of the ordinary religious and philosophical beliefs and perceptions: “What links creativity, conspiracy theories, and delusions? A phenomenon called apophenia […] possible culprit in apophenia is dopamine. A 2002 experiment revealed that people with high levels of dopamine more often extract meaning from coincidences than those with lower dopamine levels. And when self-described skeptics (team “UFOs are fake”) were given the drug L-dopa, which ups the brain’s dopamine supply, they began to perform more like self-described believers (team “I can speak to spirits”) on the same pattern-finding tasks.” – https://archive.ph/XhERC

    For example, Utah British-Ancestry Mormons — genetically through the COMT Met/Met allele (AA genotype in the table) — have the highest genetic brain dopamine levels in the world: https://archive.ph/0XBv4

    Carriers of the COMT Met/Met allele have higher degrees of hypnotizability
    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25084618/ or https://archive.ph/zpcl3

    Bipolar disorder is more prevalent in the United States than in other countries
    https://www.apa.org/monitor/2011/06/bipolar or https://archive.ph/HPMQT
    More than 4 percent of Americans have ever met diagnostic criteria for bipolar disorder, as compared with a worldwide average of about 2 percent

    America Is a Laboratory for Religious Experiments

    • Replies: @RVIDXR
  271. Your personal opinions on the gay world are dramatically different than mine. Presumably you are straight, and aside from the personal experiences you mention from WeHo, I see no reason to put more faith in your anecdotes and assertions than I do in my own lived experience.

    Think what you like, Rockaboatus, it’s no skin off my back, and like I said before God Bless. Hopefully we can at least both agree that assault, battery and murder should carry the same ‘harsh penalties’ under law as those you propose for gays being “given a sympathetic platform and permitted to propagandize among us”, however it is you propose to define and codify those things.

    Personally, when I read your punch line and proposed remedies, it smells to me like just another version of what the CIA and US corporate imperium have been doing to Christian, anti-war, and and national sovereignty or independence movements across the global south for decades. Nevermind the whole boisterous sea of liberty thing. ☮️

    • Replies: @Thor Walhovd
  272. @Mario Partisan

    Technically epstein was a pederast. He liked underage but postpubescent persons. Pedophiles like prepubescent children. What is a “superficial sadist?”

    • Replies: @Mario Partisan
  273. profnasty says:

    C’mon man, you know you want it (/sarc).
    I told y’all just last week. Been sayin it for years. Homo-ism will no longer be voluntary. Legal in all 50 states, mandatory in California. Soon to be all 50.

    Jew and Black comedians- Movie- Stir Crazy. Movie about prison. Filmed in a real prison.. Black sez, “Hey man stop talkin to the prisoners, they will rape you!” Jew sez, “No, I’m not homosexual. ” Black sez, “They don’t rape you because you like it, they just want to see the look on your face. ”

    They are determined to see your face-
    https://www.investmentwatchblog.com/remember-this-story-employee-at-major-bank-in-canada-told-he-wont-get-promotion-unless-he-joins-homosexual-group/

  274. @FKA Max

    Interesting story. But I must point out that Mr. Macron is a homo according to people in the know in Europe. That would make his older wife nothing more than a “beard.” A cover. Macron is, at best, a so-called bisexual.

    • Replies: @FKA Max
  275. Caramond says:

    So, first I read this article above. And then, same day a couple of hours later, I stumble upon this article : We investigated a suburban LGBTQ pedophile ring – here’s what we found. Read it here : https://www.sott.net/article/476419-We-investigated-a-suburban-LGBTQ-pedophile-ring-heres-what-we-found

    I guess it doesn’t need any additional comments… This is so appaling, revolting, hideous.

  276. @Happy Tapir

    Police have stated that there is no profile for a “pedophile”. there are no traits linked with pedophilia. There is no associated pathology, at least for the heterosexual trait, unless you want to go testing low IQ people incarcerated for an offence.

    All of us when four years old experienced arousal when looking at ourselves in the mirror naked. There is no reason for this to change with age, and the very high rates of plethysmographic arousal among adults to pictures of naked children confirm this. The main difference age makes is that we form an emotional + sexual orientation toward grown partners, although this varies by culture.

    I’m quite sure that pedophilia is just a subset of adults who are sexually conscientized toward children, who have an emotional preference for young people, combined with extreme public anxiety and an availability cascade. You can see evidence of this availability cascade in the complete nonsensical posts of others here, putting forward the dismissed concept of pedophiles “being made” by molestation. There are no examples put forward in the media of women who think fondly of their relationship with a man as a child. It is prohibited, despite this being more common than expected, at least until recent decades. You have to ask actual women to get proper testimony.

    On the other hand, the 80s push against pedophilia was made by moral campaigner charlatans like Mary Whitehouse, who suggested that 600,000 American children were being sexually exploited, and who misused pictures of beaten children to manipulate audiences. Police keep their budgets up by maximising the perceived danger using distressing language.

  277. Skeptic51 says:

    RockaBoatus attitudes are a Crock of Detritus. His stereotyping and blanket condemnation of gays is no different from Third Reich attitudes toward gays, Jews, Gypsies, and non-Aryans.

    The fact is, at least 5% of people have same-sex attractions and inclinations…and some I have known are highly responsible, caring human beings looking for long-term committed relationships (and raising children in some cases).

    The problem(s) are in behaviors, not orientations which in my opinion are natural and biological. Problem behaviors like rape, domination/bullying, violent rage/jealousy, prostitution, human trafficking, murder, organ harvesting, and porn addiction are all morally wrong…and these behaviors are wrong for heterosexuals or homosexuals.

    The path forward is love, healthy self-love, healthy relationship love, healthy spiritual love. Any categorization of people into boxes and stereotypes is a diminishment of those people and a discounting of their lives and value.

    • Replies: @RockaBoatus
  278. @Thor Walhovd

    Right after you childishly insult those who disagree with sodomy you write this:

    Better just to praise God every day and be grateful for each moment among my brothers and sisters and try to live in peace and humility

    You Churchians are not peaceful or humble:

    I have no desire to change minds on this topic, and learned that debating with insecure meathead jocks was a waste of time way back in the 7th grade. Just like debating Russiagate or the Scamdemic with a Clintonite cult member is a waste of time

    You didn’t make faggots look any better. Keep that in mind for the next anti somomite article.

    • LOL: Thor Walhovd
    • Replies: @Thor Walhovd
  279. I am wondering why LGBT movement has never postulated Gayland, a promised land for gays and their fellow travellers. You cried, cried like Jews due to all the oppression surrounding you… why don’t take inspiration from Jews even further…? A Promised Gayland upon the Earth! Possible locations could be Hawaii or some isolated part of Australia (like Western part), or maybe Ceylon…?
    There no gay thing would be wrong. Gayland would be replenished by forced expatriation of gays from heterosexuals countries, and by eager lesbians doing their duty, lesbians who surely would understand the wisdom of Amazons story – this time, however, they would know what to do with these unwanted boys.

    Yet gays and their fellow LGBT crowd insist on living among heterosexuals….WHY? Isn’t it a kind of soft torture for homosexuals…? Why do you want to feel triggered? Why do you insist on being everywhere…? You don’t want to conquer the world, do you…?!

  280. @NeverTrustaWizard

    Anti-somomites unite! And I stopped worrying about trying to make gays look better back around 1989. And sodomy has no sexual orientation, in case you’ve been living under a rock for the last 70 years. LOL

  281. @Gerhard57NL

    Whatever one may think of the Catholic Church, they’re not trying to foist a sexual deviancy upon my children nor are they forcing the government to pay for whatever sexual diseases result from such practices. But homosexuals do.

    I don’t see Catholics parading about naked in public attired in leather and bondage devices before children as homosexuals do in their ‘pride’ parades.

    The Catholics I see are not trying to infiltrate our public schools with a propagandist message that most societies throughout the world have condemned. But homosexuals do.

    Traditionalist Catholics aren’t trying to groom little boys into future fudge packers, but homosexuals sure do.

    • Thanks: anarchyst
  282. @Skeptic51

    “His stereotyping and blanket condemnation of gays is no different from Third Reich attitudes toward gays, Jews, Gypsies, and non-Aryans” – Whatever one may think of the National Socialists, they should at least be given credit for recognizing the societally destructive elements that homosexuals bring when they are given free reign. To ignore the homosexual threat is to invite gay parades, skyrocketing levels of STD’s, rampant deviancy, sexual grooming of our young children, increasing healthcare costs, and a downward moral spiral for any society stupid enough to ‘tolerate’ them.

    “The path forward is love, healthy self-love, healthy relationship love, healthy spiritual love” – None of which homosexuals can give in any meaningful way unless, of course, we completely redefine what is meant by “love,” “healthy,” and “spiritual.” Homosexuals must resort to such redefinitions because their ‘lifestyles’ run egregiously against the natural or created order of things. Self-deception and suppressing one’s moral conscience are no way to live.

    “Any categorization of people into boxes and stereotypes is a diminishment of those people and a discounting of their lives and value” – Whether you like it or not, this is what all humans do, including yourself. The issue is not whether we shall discriminate and stereotype others, but whether we have done so accurately and with good reason. Everything I have stated in my article is precisely what massive numbers of homosexuals engage in. I have accurately portrayed the greater majority of them, including the problems they bring to the family and western civilization itself.

    • Agree: Johnny LeBlanc
  283. Allow me to interrupt the party.

    There is not a single ion of evidence that supports same relational conduct is the product of biological forces. None. It does not exist. The hard search by a primary advocate and researcher in the question openly stated and I have referenced him before

    “to date there is no biological marker that indicates a cause to the conduct. It is doubtful that one will ever be found.” That was as far back as the 1980’s or early 90’s

    Those in the field supporting this conduct who have stated otherwise have been repeatedly rebuffed as upon a read of their research, they make “suggestions, implications, might be, could be . . . perhaps . . .” But no study has even hinted at the claims being suggested here. Researchers have, but the evidence does not. Speculative at best wishful thinking as hope — to create a ground for normalizing the conduct. Why in CA voters adopted a policy to limit/prevent the advocacy of the conduct in elementary and HS a vote that was vetoed by Gov. Reagan.

    Apparently the voters in Ca understood where this road led. Now suppose they found this gene. or the markers, that would not mean the conduct is normal. It would still be statistically unusual. As a single male, I could have repeatedly benefitted from being labled one who practices this conduct — laugh — I have certainly been held suspect to the same.

    Laugh. The community has statistically been in the most connected, well established elite circles, and upper tiers of finance, education, management, education, income brackets and lifestyles.

    I cannot endorse the anyone who claims they have a mandate from God to deny civil liberties for said practices or a mandate to assault the same. However, there are plenty of valid reasons outside of one’s moral code to oppose it’s teaching and the marriage platform in the US.

    It is entirely possible to be on the otherside of the question and still have successful relationships with people who so engage.

    ————————————

    There is no biological marker that supports a genetic cause. And even Twin Studies rebut the notion. For me the tell is the research done as far as the 1970’s which related that as many of the men who engaged in the conduct by choice left the same and went on to having “normal” heterosexuals’ relations with women in marriage and raised a family.

    ———————————–

    The debate: suppose a marker is found —- do those so inclined opt for repair via drug or some other intrusive medical procedure.

  284. Anonymous[255] • Disclaimer says:
    @beavertales

    Russia’s response is a cop-out. The satanic beast is patient and understands the long game. In time, Russia will be as fagged as America. Putin is a shabbos goy and would never do anything to truly undermine sodomy, one of the two greatest sacraments in judyism.

  285. I think there needs to be a federal holiday called Gay Day. There are two federal holidays worshiping blacks—mlk day and Juneteenth—and not a single one recognizing the suffering of lgtq people. Perhaps it could coincide with Stonewall or maybe the death of Harvey milk, idk.

  286. RVIDXR says:
    @FKA Max

    Thank you for sharing those links about dopamine and apophenia, and everything else for that matter. Based on my personal experience of seeing normally grounded people have a sort of religious revival due to reality being grim I suspect that there’s other factors that go into it as as well. I’m also curious about the bipolar statistic, I wonder if that always elevated in that group from the start or if it’s a result of native admixture- I remember reading many years ago that native americans have much higher rates of bipolar disorder and other mental illnesses.

    Anyway that video slots right in with what I was saying about the civil war essentially being a race war, one northern liberals are still waging via support of policies designed to ethnically cleansse middle American Whites who they view as their racial enemies. Religious and ideological beliefs is clearly genetic and even though I haven’t bothered to look into it to prove definitively there’s some striking similarities between those radical leftist christians and jews to the point that I think it more likely than not that they share some genes.

    • Replies: @FKA Max
  287. @RockaBoatus

    Yet no one calls her out. No outrage. No ridicule. Just silence. They all just go along with the lies and deceptions like the sheep they are.

    They know that displeasing trannies will displease Jews.

    You don’t kick the King’s dog even if it bites you because King would be displeased.

    Whites are now brown-nosers to Jews.

  288. Thomm says:
    @Stripes Duncan

    So you literally said that a white man having sex with a famously pretty woman who is 50-75% white and just 25-50% black is just as offensive as pedophilia and bestiality. Whether a 1970s Pam Grier, a 1990s Halle Berry, or any other equivalent; take your pick.

    You also equated both pedophilia and bestiality with the act of an adult man (XY chromosomes) having sex with an adult woman (XX chromosomes).

    The race of the woman is not even important. Any normal heterosexual man of any race would choose a woman (let alone a famously pretty woman) over a man. You could have even framed your answer as “both are bad, but one is much less bad than the other”, but you could not do that.

    You WNs are so out of touch with mainstream, heterosexual society that you literally don’t even know what the 97% of people who are heterosexuals consider to be normal. I guarantee that virtually every heterosexual mainstream white person will find our answer to be diametrically opposed to how a normal person would answer.

  289. Has anyone here ever seen examples of male dogs humping each other? I’ve seen it a number of times. It does seem like a certain amount of either homosexual or perhaps bisexual behavior occurs naturally in the wild. The major difference is that animals have only short-term memories. That means that a male dog who impregnates one female dog and then humps off of a hundred other male dogs is still “heterosexual” by nature’s standards.

    Among humans, when a male does something akin to what I’ve seen some male dogs do with each other, our capacity for memory means that the event has big implications. There’s no point in trying to argue whether this is fair or not. It’s just a consequence of having a higher memory capacity. Animals will swiftly slip into reproductive behavior even after acting “abnormally” because there isn’t such a clear wall of separation when your memory is so limited.

    From what I can see, a small proportion of humans do have a natural inclination towards sexual activity with members of the same sex. Probably most of those who do have not traditionally pursued such activity, since their own knowledge of how things will be remembered makes them stop short where an animal would go ahead. For those who do push ahead with homosexual activity it probably does involve deeper psychological ramifications than would occur with a dog humping another dog of the same sex. That’s just the consequence of being able to remember things which dogs will easily forget. But the behavior of animals shows that some limited strain of homosexuality within the species is not inherently unnatural at all.

    • Replies: @Corrupt
  290. Unless Jewish Power is outed on this, this garbage will just keep spreading.

  291. @EliteCommInc.

    Amazing how heavily opposed here is the idea of genetic origins of homosexuality. So heavily that it suggest some truth behind it… Someone is afraid to lose his BEARD forever…?!

    Well, we will never know for sure until someone finally will research correlation between homosexuality and endogamy/cousin marriage/inbredness. Amazing that it hasn’t been done until now… whereas studies, inspired by Bible (Judges 20:16), connecting left-handedness and homosexuality (positive correlation!) were done – that already suggests genetic origins.

    If results were positive, we wouldn’t even need to know genetic markers to know how not to produce more homosexuals.

  292. FKA Max says: • Website
    @RVIDXR

    You are welcome, glad you found the information useful. I forgot to link to the full paper I took the Mormon COMT Met/Met allele frequencies from: “Distribution of the Val108/158 Met Polymorphism of COMT Gene in the Khasi, Garo, Jaintia Populations of Northeast India” https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Distribution-of-the-Val108%2F158-Met-Polymorphism-of-Phanrang-Mawkhiew/9f6fbcb891a63b955f5bba31fa6a571137e90d6c or https://archive.ph/J1Uqh

    Religious and ideological beliefs is clearly genetic and even though I haven’t bothered to look into it to prove definitively there’s some striking similarities between those radical leftist christians and jews to the point that I think it more likely than not that they share some genes.

    They do share some genes, but Jews (0.486) have, on average, lower frequencies of the COMT Met allele than, for example, most Northwestern Europeans (Danes have the highest frequency at 0.609), details here: https://www.unz.com/jtaylor/how-the-races-got-that-way/?showcomments#comment-5746629 (but the genotype frequency table in that paper does not specifically break out the COMT Met/Met frequencies of the various populations)

    In regards to Jews specifically, I did extensive research on their population genetics, in order to figure out and “demystify” (mostly for myself initially) their weird and often hostile and also irrational behavior. Chateau Heartiste, unbeknownst to me at first, using my research wrote a very good piece on the topic, appropriately titling it (only available in archived form now):

    Ashkepathy
    June 19, 2017
    https://archive.ph/yanxo or http://web.archive.org/web/20190504043203/https://heartiste.wordpress.com/2017/06/19/ashkepathy/ even more detailed discussion here https://www.unz.com/mwhitney/why-do-americans-hate-putin/?showcomments#comment-5674063 in case you really want to go into the weeds on the topic…

    • Replies: @RVIDXR
  293. @Thor Walhovd

    I take it as a compliment that the reply status of this reply to an author comment was removed. Perhaps pointing out the violent, authoritarian dog whistle nature of the author’s conclusion struck a nerve. Guess a shadowban is better than getting deleted, lol.

    • Replies: @spacewonderer
  294. FKA Max says: • Website
    @Davy Crockit

    My advice, don’t spend so much time trying to figure out why they are… […] More time on seeing them for what they are… and what they do.

    I believe, focusing more on the symptoms of those undesirable traits, rather than their root cause(s) is potentially counter-productive and risks “not seeing the forest for the trees.”

    There seems to be a general and genuine desire to really figure out and potentially solve these problematic and highly contentious societal issues, as the high number of comments in this comments thread and, IMHO, the accompanying highly productive and insightful discussions/debates we have had over the last couple of days attest to.

  295. “Perhaps pointing out the violent, authoritarian dog whistle nature of the author’s conclusion struck a nerve” (Thor Walhovd) – You are reading strange notions into my comments. You are over-reacting and creating verbal ‘drama’ around my words so as to malign me. It’s the same sort of thing Black race hustlers do, including foolish White women who have been duped by ‘white privilege’ propaganda – namely, to portray those who disagree with them as hostile and violent, or guilty of trying to signal to others so they might commit a violent ‘hate crime.’ Only the gullible and naive fall for such nonsense.

    I have not at all advocated ‘violence’ against homosexuals in my article. Nothing like that is in my comments. Neither have I ‘dog whistled’ for anyone else to commit any acts of violence.

    I don’t mind you disagreeing with me. This is the nature of debate and open discussion. But at least have the integrity and intellectual honesty to accurately portray what I have stated.

  296. FKA Max says: • Website
    @Automatic Slim

    Thanks for your feedback. Interesting (life) story, indeed, on many levels.

    Macron might be a closeted homosexualist or bisexualist, but as Ed Dutton pointed out in his video, there’s been very little research on why certain younger men are mostly attracted to older women.

    I can only speak from personal experience, but when I had sex and/or was in relationships with same-aged, younger or slightly or some even significantly older women than myself, I most of the time felt like I was having sex/dealing with metaphorical minors, so I found them to be emotionally and intellectually highly unpredictable, which made me uncomfortable and is/was a sexual and general turn off for me. I have encountered highly immature older women, so age is not necessarily the attraction factor for me per se, but older women, in general, are more mature/experienced, less drama-prone, etc. than younger ones, and that’s what (and why) I’m drawn to (them). That’s also why I don’t feel completely comfortable around most homosexuals, since I also perceive most of them to be somewhat emotionally and intellectually immature and unpredictable, i.e. “drama queens”, etc.

    Maybe it’s really an attraction to intelligence and emotional stability for me?

  297. RVIDXR says:
    @FKA Max

    I didn’t read that article about putin you linked, that’s regrettable purely on the basis that I missed your comment. I didn’t know that about Russia or Hungary, I remember finding it strange that Orban had such close ties to Netanyahu but now it makes sense. As for the Chateau article, funnily enough I read it not long after it was posted but I had completely forgotten about it but I’ve learned a lot since then so a lot of that has renewed significance to me now.

    That Lynn book about psychopathic personality vaguely mentions middle eastern people having high incidence rates of psychopathic traits similar to sub saharans, that would obviously include jews. I always viewed jews as being a sort of hybrid of US northern liberals and bantu and the more I learn about them the more it seems to confirm that, the behavior certainly matches.

    I confess that I mentioned that bit about jews in the hopes you’d shed some light on it, figured the odds were good that you would since you’ve proven to be knowledgeable and willing to share so thank you, again, for humoring me.

    • Thanks: FKA Max
  298. Before going further, I think I should state, that I oppose most of the advocacy that advances the same relational crowd’s agenda in form and substance. But I do not support engaging in conduct that in any way denies a US citizen their constitutional rights. Now in some instances, what constitutes a right is certainly a matter of discussion. Marriage is out.

    “… Someone is afraid to lose his BEARD forever…?! Well, we will never know for sure until someone finally will research correlation between homosexuality and endogamy/cousin marriage/inbredness. Amazing that it hasn’t been done until now… whereas studies, inspired by Bible (Judges 20:16), connecting left-handedness and homosexuality (positive correlation!) were done – that already suggests genetic origins. . . . . If results were positive, we wouldn’t even need to know genetic markers to know how not to produce more homosexuals.”

    I hope have your take correct.

    1. I don’t have a beard, though I can go a while without shaving. laugh

    2. I am not sure you grasp the issue. The conduct is claimed to have a biological cause. But to make that claim, one has to demonstrate the process as it comes from some biological root. And those claims have been made, but upon examination — proven incorrect.

    And most of the research actually refutes the claim. Twin studies, those engaged o over a lifetime actually making a choice to have opposite relational dynamics and actually being fulfilled in the doing. I guess one could argue that they have overcome biology with minding – or self will, which then buttresses the argument that what is referred to as normal — is in fact achievable by choice. It’s why the constant refrain about blackness and physical prowess simply fails. Most blacks exhibit no more physical prowess than whites —- what makes great athletes, time and time again is demonstrated to be — practice. And while it is accurate to note that some individuals have a genetic disposition to do X — the evidence does not support a guarantor that they will in fact do X or even desire to do X.

    And that is pressed by environment. Grow up in an environment in which physical force is prevalent, it is likely that one will be of like disposition.

    The contention that said conduct is derived over time via lineage would not change of the tougher question regarding choice, change, adaptation, will, etc.

    ———————-

    As for the Stonewall incident. upon close examination, the real issue was serving liquor to minors which gave a cause to challenging the bars conduct — and thus the failure not obtain a license.

    The debate however is whether one changes to adopt a “normative” relational dynamic if they could or remain where they are — should some biological marker be found.

  299. “Amazing that it hasn’t been done until now… whereas studies, inspired by Bible (Judges 20:16), connecting left-handedness and homosexuality (positive correlation!) were done – that already suggests genetic origins.”

    Here we are discussing biology. And as untoward as it was, one can learn to use the other hand. Correlations are helpful in determining sociological conditions — biology to conduct that is not static as in breathing — I am a tad dubious.

    ——————–

    And as conservative as I am, I have to reject the dismissal of “white privilege”. That has deep roots in history of policy and social conduct, that probably settles the question. What to do about the consequences of said socialization — is another matter.

    You cannot build a society in which skin color is a key factor to being in or out and not create a system of privilege of one group over another. And in the case of the US, several hundred years – if one examines said system before the country was founded.

  300. Backward says:

    While you are getting sprayed daily with nanoparticulate, and fried daily with increasingly high radiation from cell towers and satellites, while your forests are dying and your oceans collapsing, it makes sense for gatekeepers like Unz to distract you with incel trivia.

  301. @EliteCommInc.

    The contention that said conduct is derived over time via lineage would not change of the tougher question regarding choice, change, adaptation, will, etc.

    Well, if these gay lineages are gradually removed from the equation by dispersing responsible genes instead concentrating them, these tougher questions would finally disappear. Simple as that. If there are no gays, there are no gay questions, so to say. This is probably why gays want to be perceived as fully normal – you don’t remove normalcy from society.

    Aside from that, you are certainly right that the individual conduct of a given homosexual person cannot be said to be fully determined by his genetic makeup, at least not before he has lived his life. At the beginning of his life, it is rather a disposition. However, it is well known that resisting our inborn dispositions is usually a tough problem, and usually without upside (well, a very few may become saints but that is not enough to retain others inherent vice, as Thomas Pynchon would say).

  302. SBaker says:
    @FKA Max

    I had a couple of bouts with older women, but much preferred those my age and a bit younger–its something about being fresher, less used, and less likely to have a disease. I married one that was 23 when I was 27. I have simply had too many girlfriends to remember all of them by full name. There was always another girl around the corner that seemed to take advantage of my good nature. They just kept on using me, until they used me up–remember that song. I was 8 when I had my first kiss, one from a girl my age and one that was 2 years older–I remember that one like it was yesterday.

    • Replies: @FKA Max
  303. @Hulkamania

    No I don’t you lying psychopath. I DESPISE US sham moralism and have done so repeatedly. And the ongoing climate destabilisation cataclysm, that, at least, will remove creatures like you from the cosmos, is REALITY, and the USA has been a leading opponent of real action to avert it. You’re quite the most extraordinarly slandering liar I’ve seen for some time. Dementia?

    • Replies: @Hulkamania
  304. @SBaker

    Your genocidal gibbering is truly sickening. I see, too, that you seem to be quite OK with coprophilia, necrophilia, bestiality and pederasty so long as it is nice and heterosexual. Or did you just express yourself poorly? This one has brought the hardcore haters out of the sewer, that’s for sure.

  305. @RockaBoatus

    The enormous lies we live under staggers the mind when we stop to think about it.

    I commend you for realizing this, RB. Staggering is the right word. It shows me that you are really a special kind of aware person. Don’t lose it.

  306. “Well, if these gay lineages are gradually removed from the equation by dispersing responsible genes instead concentrating them, these tougher questions would finally disappear. Simple as that. If there are no gays, there are no gay questions, so to say.”

    st bo
    well, at this point, I mu

  307. “Well, if these gay lineages are gradually removed from the equation by dispersing responsible genes instead concentrating them, these tougher questions would finally disappear. Siample as that. If there are no gays, there are no gay questions, so to say.”

    well, at this point, I must bow out. I have no desire or mandate to remove US citizens regardless of their choice of expressing intimate conduct. That is a matter, for which there is no constitutional justification. Just as they may disapprove or my expression but must tolerate it, so must I theirs.

    The notion of removing people who engage in conduct I may not approve of that is their own would invite agreeing to be likewise treated — the constitution protects our dislikes as it does our persons seeking to deprive one their rights based on the same.

    And despite my unwillingness to embrace the expression –the notion of removing them is foreign to me. And I could not possibly endorse any such progrom. And why there is not way to support Russia’s actions she claims is based on similar grounds.

    and to clarify, nothing supports a biological determinant – nothing. Human desire for intimacy is of course innate, the evidence that said desire for one of the same biology is less than dubious.

  308. @mulga mumblebrain

    I DESPISE US sham moralism and have done so repeatedly.

    You don’t even understand what US moralism is because, again, you are a low IQ loser and useless idiot. You are defending American moralism in this comment section.

    And the ongoing climate destabilisation cataclysm, that, at least, will remove creatures like you from the cosmos, is REALITY,

    False. Intelligent people do not believe climate propaganda because we understand mathematics. I can tell you for a fact that the Chinese state does not believe unsupported “climate destabilization cataclysm” propaganda, for example. Only low IQ defective retards, such as yourself or Gretel Thunberg, who could not tell the difference between a linear or nonlinear differential equation to save their lives, believe this stuff.

    and the USA has been a leading opponent of real action to avert it.

    Completely false. The American empire has been the leading proponent of “climate action,” globally. That is why the most enthusiastic “climate action” states are all America’s vassals. If the American empire truly opposed it, that wouldn’t be the case. “Climate action” is an important part of America’s doctrine of full spectrum dominance and energy control.

    • Replies: @GomezAdddams
  309. @Thor Walhovd

    Sure. But is your gayness better than getting deleted? lol.

  310. @Vito Klein

    were tolerant toward gays individually

    And we can all see where this tolerant attitude of trashy liberal American pseudo-christians leads now.

  311. @Joe Paluka

    The system cannot be rebuilt. All that can be done is to build anew from the ruins; that can take centuries and involves a great deal of suffering and sacrifice. Western Europeans, which includes the Anglosphere, haven’t the appetite for the bloodshed that is to come because they haven’t the will to survive.

    Most people are appalled at what they have been told the Germans, who were trying to save Western civilisation, did to the Jews, who have always been bent on destroying it. Those people have happily queued for toxic jab after toxic jab, of substances made by corporations controlled by Jews dedicated to destroying them. Those people vote time after time for governments controlled by Jews dedicated to destroying them. Those people are doomed, and we are probably doomed with them.

  312. @Happy Tapir

    I used “superficial” as an adjective, but I was trying to convey that sadists are inherently superficial beings, not that there is a special category of sadists who are superficial.

    If you fmri brain scan sociopaths, you see that they lack function in the pre-frontal cortex, the area associated with higher order functions that make someone fully human, empathy, theory of mind, etc. As a result, the sociopath sees other beings as objects.

    Things that make normal human beings happy have no impact on the sociopath. A happy puppy, for example, does nothing for the sociopath. Pleasure for these creatures is limited to feeling dominant over others. In this sense, they are superficial – totally lacking in depth of feeling and obsessed with “winning” and feeling “big.”

  313. @mulga mumblebrain

    Then why do you bother talking to me?

    PS: Your comment right underneath your reply to me bears the hallmark of hatred. Projection?

    • Replies: @mulga mumblebrain
  314. @EliteCommInc.

    I have no desire or mandate to remove US citizens regardless of their choice of expressing intimate conduct.

    No one will remove them. They will simply do not come into existence.

    If homosexuality is a recessive genetic trait (like a red hair, for example), it is enough to ban bearing children among the group of trait bearers, which – under the hypothesis that homosexuality in the past was mainly preserved due to endogamy & cousin marriage – would not be substantially larger than homosexual group itself; if the latter are to be like 2% of population (according to this forum suggestions), altogether it would be maybe 5-6% of population (homosexuals + heterosexual trait bearers) which would be banned from marrying and having children among THEMSELVES. They still could choose from the rest of 95% population, and have children with them.

    And, AFAIK, US Constitution does not give you right to having children. Well, the precise question is : does US Constitution gives you right to have genetically defective children?
    Actually, since eugenic movement was once strong in USA, maybe this question was already discussed once but I am no expert on US constitutional history.

  315. Jugon says:
    @Commentator Mike

    Well a Malaysian here .Should the party gets raided by the police it means most or some of the participants are Muslim malays.usually police won’t bother to raid and arrest a non Muslim homosexual here.For a muslim being gay is a sentence and life is a living hell for them.Most can’t have a regular job without being harassed.Thats the reason why you notice many Malay homosexual are into the transvestite and transexual scene.its easy for them to eke a living given Malaysia has tonnes of horny foreign worker from South Asia and middle eastern tourist.As for Indians you can see many Indian transvestite during temple functions.Generally speaking non Muslims gays have it easier than their Muslim counterpart

  316. @mulga mumblebrain

    Your genocidal gibbering is truly sickening. I see, too, that you seem to be quite OK with coprophilia, necrophilia, bestiality and pederasty so long as it is nice and heterosexual. Or did you just express yourself poorly? This one has brought the hardcore haters out of the sewer, that’s for sure.

    If you are so concerned with climate change then shouldn’t you be celebrating alternative forms of sexuality with the leftists?

    Most CO2 is not from the US/EU and yet the left seems to think Whites should stop having children for the sake of the planet. Wapo even published an editorial on how having children is selfish and against the planet. Gee what race are they actually addressing?

    The left by their actions clearly doesn’t think that anything can be done about Africa’s population growth and wants Whites to end their genetic lines out of subservience to globalism.

    Will technologies like solar power be developed at the same levels without Whites? Well of course you stupid racist. Leftists don’t believe that Africans can control their reproduction levels but that they can dominate technological fields once we get rid of bad White juju. It all makes sense unless you are a stupid racist.

  317. @Dumbo

    I don’t know. I think some homosexuals are more feminine and interested in female stuff (clothes, gossip, etc) but many others, not. Many have more male interests like politics, science etc.

    Even the ones with male interests are not wired the same.

    There is no such thing as a homosexual that seems completely straight until he retires to the bedroom.

    That is a media creation.

    Your namesake Greg Johnson for instance, he doesn’t strike me as someone very interested in shoes.

    I have nothing to do with Greg Johnson and I don’t support White nationalism.

    But I would bet a million dollars that he follows some type of gay pattern with his shoes.

    The ones I met were not very feminine (well, some were, but I think this is more an affectation, a signal to other gays), and had more or less “male” interests (news, science, politics, etc – not female stuff).

    The lisp and overtly feminine mannerisms are a stereotype. But if you have worked with the public in a city like LA you can learn to quickly identify the gays. They have certain tells even if they seem straight. Women that date in a liberal city also learn to spot them.

    Here is a short list:
    1. No show socks with brand new low cut shoes
    2. Capris or pants that don’t go to the ankles
    3. Expensive print shirts, often one size too small
    4. No stains or holes in clothes
    5. Overly manicured beard or mustache
    6. Hair highlights
    7. Goes shopping with male friend instead of alone
    8. Makes 6 figures and has a roommate
    9. Has a fat White chick friend

    You can identify 95% of gays with a few of these traits. It’s not that difficult. Once you have lived in a liberal city for a period you can sense them a mile away. Kind of like how you can sense Blacks walking at night even if you can’t see their skin color. Your brain picks up on the pattern.

    • Replies: @FKA Max
  318. Anonymous[255] • Disclaimer says:
    @folkvangr

    Dude. What’s your fucking problem? Was this article too close to your closet door?

    Piss off.

    • Replies: @folkvangr
  319. “If homosexuality is a recessive genetic trait (like a red hair, for example), it is enough to ban bearing children among the group of trait bearers, which – under the hypothesis that homosexuality in the past was mainly preserved due to endogamy & cousin marriage – would not be substantially larger than homosexual group itself; if the latter are to be like 2% of population (according to this forum suggestions), altogether it would be maybe 5-6% of population (homosexuals + heterosexual trait bearers) which would be banned from marrying and having children among THEMSELVES. They still could choose from the rest of 95% population, and have children with them.”

    Laugh. I would consider this perspective save for one small little detail —–

    there is no genetic evidence that the conduct results from any biological marker. It has not been evidenced in the blood chemistry, cranial or brain fluids, brain size, brain shape, genetic coding, or any of the purported possible indicators. The conduct as a social construct is not akin to skin color, hair color, shape, or the thousands of practices or genetically organized functions of humans. Expecting that over time there will be some decline based on the weeding out via of nature is a tough sell. So any reference to said trait has no relevance in my view.

    And again, while it is conduct that I cannot approve or endorse. The very notion of genetic manipulation by banning such relations is not something I can endorse and because the conduct is social construct by choice — any suggestion of diminished numbers via such manipulation would in all likelihood fail.

    I think the evidence is very clear, that the growth in numbers is the direct result a societal embrace. And the effort to invade the vulnerable spaces of mental or emotional condition: youth, people in experiencing interpersonal growth development, experience some persona crisis who is their search for answers grasp idea which fill the void, even if the answers are correct or highly speculative and/or wrong — are adopted as feasible. Clearing a moment, and then becomes adopted as real ———————-

    Dangerous stuff, for the vulnerable, and children are the most vulnerable in this regard. I do support maintaining parental controls when it comes the children. I think the educational system is way out of line as in Congress, and the WH on the question — even a dizzying number if people whose faith and practice is that of scripture. The US is not going to weed out the conduct, but there are reasons why children should be the targets of advocacy. No offense to the field of psychiatry — but the experimentation in this arena is a mistake. And as o children

    — good golly miss molly.

    On a personal note, because so many have assumed that celibacy was the result of some “same relational” conflict — nonsense. In the 1990’s I began to swim upstream and do some homework on the issue. Then 2003 — 2005 when the matter became a full fledged event — marriage. I stumbled on the APA Conferences of 1972 and 1973 — especially 1973. The entire change of same relational conduct was not the result of science. It is the result of a very deliberate calculated violent protest and blackmail scheme of coercive tactics in which the APA conference was literally hijacked — and threatened into changing the the APA’s stance on the conduct.

    And that settled the matter for me — not science, not medical investigation, but sheer emotional and physical threat.

    Sigh, fortunately, this all occurred before I got smacked in the head —

    I appreciate the field of psychiatry, but there are some very untoward practices that are coming out of it minus any real checks because it is scary to make such challenges — because one can very easily find themselves a target for something that is hard to counter because the accusation is false. i.e. being “outed” when there is nothing to “out”. Those are the weapons that are turning the social reality upside down. One day your child comes with these notions about themselves and soddenly one is forced to reconsider their own place.

    ———————————
    “They have certain tells even if they seem straight. Women that date in a liberal city also learn to spot them.”

    I think this is more old wives tale, might be accurate for people hanging amongst a certain community. One of my oldest friends thought I was so inclined. Even introduced me to in an effort to help me get connected. Uhhh, she was wrong as has been any number of men sidling up to make my acquaintance — nyet, no and not al all . . .

    I wonder how many lives were destroyed by the years of “outing people” who were never in. And so much of that destruction from liberals who claim one’s choices of intimate expression should not matter.

    ——-

    Again, no claims to a effective christian voice or anything of the kind. But I think christ warns people of faith to avoid separating wheat from tares, because in the doing, wheat is also lost. Might not matter much in agriculture, but in the lives of human beings —

    Russia’s war to weed out “sinners” has no mandate any more than the crusades hundreds of years before.

    ————————

    “Kind of like how you can sense Blacks walking at night even if you can’t see their skin color. Your brain picks up on the pattern.”

    Ohhh that is fascinating, as if all black citizens walk the same — ohh come now.

    • Replies: @John Johnson
  320. Thomm says:

    This is a very apt article from Rockaboatus, which is relevant to the state of White Nationalism.

    As we can see above, various WNs, when faced with the simple question of whether they thought it would be worse for them to have sex with a white man or the prettiest quatroon/mulatto (such as a 1970s Pam Grier or a 1990s Halle Berry), many either said they would choose the man, or refused to answer the question even after it was posed a second, third, or fourth time to them. This is a situation where no answer clearly is an answer.

    Remember that a regular heterosexual man (white or otherwise) would have no hesitation in making it super clear that he prefers a 1990s Halle Berry (or equivalent famously pretty mulatto/quatroon) over a man (of any race) as a sexual partner.

    Their rationale is that race loyalty has to trump sexual orientation, and that producing no baby is better than producing a quatroon or octoroon baby. At least they are able to spell out their logic.

    The full list of commenters here who either outright said they prefer the man, or would not say that they prefer the prettiest quatroon woman in the world over a man, is as follows :

    JohnnySmoggins
    GeneralRimmer
    utu
    AndrewR
    Svigor
    Mike Tre (aka MikeatMikedotMike)
    Hangnail Hans
    Twodees Partain
    BenKenobi
    neutral
    iffen
    William Badwhite
    Porktastic
    Polistra
    Pericles
    Lurker
    Cowtown Rebel
    Trinity
    JMcG
    kihowi

    Remember that any of these individuals can get removed from this list at any time if they simply say that having sex with a 1990s Halle Berry (or equivalent very pretty quatroon/mulatto) is much better than having sex with a white man.

    Truth, Rosie, Mrs. Alden, Audacious Epigone, and Anatoly Karlin will all vouch for having seen members of this list behaving as described above.

  321. Well, what can one say except… ‘thanks, Jews’.

  322. FKA Max says: • Website
    @John Johnson

    I don’t support White nationalism.

    You should. Even if you are not purely white or of the Nordic phenotype, you and the world will greatly benefit from it. You seem intelligent, and white nationalism is the most intelligent and elegant solution to many of the concerns you have. You are pro-Ukraine, for example, as most of us authentic white nationalists also are. We even support Israel, admittedly for our own selfish reasons though: “But some people hate Jews more than they love their own people. They hate Jews so much that they want them to be harmed, even if it harms us too—even if it harms us more.” – https://counter-currents.com/2011/08/white-nationalism-jewish-nationalism/ or https://archive.ph/g96yT

    Greg Johnson “Fukuyama on Identity Politics”
    2nd Paneuropa Conference was held in Kyiv October 15, 2018 https://archive.ph/KAUDc

    • Replies: @John Johnson
  323. @EliteCommInc.

    there is no genetic evidence that the conduct results from any biological marker. It has not been evidenced in the blood chemistry, cranial or brain fluids, brain size, brain shape, genetic coding, or any of the purported possible indicators.

    It’s a taboo to study genetic causes of homosexuality even if liberals in theory should support them.

    They don’t want someone to find a gay gene which could then lead to gene therapy.

    Gays are consistent liberal voters/donors and liberals don’t want such a gene to be nullified.

    My guess is that there are indeed cases somewhere in the middle that can be influenced by society. But I was more open to the possibility of Christian therapies until having to be around gays through my employment. Most gay men are hopeless and they should not be encouraged into having relations with women.

    “They have certain tells even if they seem straight. Women that date in a liberal city also learn to spot them.”

    I think this is more old wives tale, might be accurate for people hanging amongst a certain community.

    An old wives tale? What exactly? Gaydar is something that comes from old women gossiping?

    Even liberals write blog posts on how to spot gays.
    https://www.datingadvice.com/advice/how-to-tell-if-a-man-is-gay

  324. @FKA Max

    I don’t support White nationalism.

    You should. Even if you are not purely white or of the Nordic phenotype, you and the world will greatly benefit from it. You seem intelligent, and white nationalism is the most intelligent and elegant solution to many of the concerns you have. You are pro-Ukraine, for example, as most of us authentic white nationalists also are.

    Oh I am Germanic White and so are my kids.

    I understand the position of White nationalism and I don’t support it.

    If Ukraine wants to be exclusively Ukrainian then I have no problem with that. It is their right just as it is the right for African countries to remain African. I don’t consider that to be White nationalism. That’s just preserving culture and heritage.

    America is a different situation. The White man in America made it clear that he would rather seek wealth rather than support his own kind. That decision has already been made. On a personal I’ve had too many Whites try to exploit me and I’m not going to work for them as a group in America. I’ve known some decent Hispanics and I’m not going to deprioritize them for some racial ideal that I don’t believe in. I have been around wealthy Whites and I absolutely put most the Hispanics I know above them. Is what it is but thanks for the offer.

    • Replies: @FKA Max
    , @Davy Crockit
  325. FKA Max says: • Website
    @John Johnson

    Fair enough and bonne chance!

  326. @John Johnson

    But I bet you support White real estate prices… So save a whole lot of money… and move to the hood and live unhapply ever after.

    • Replies: @John Johnson
  327. @Davy Crockit

    But I bet you support White real estate prices… So save a whole lot of money… and move to the hood and live unhapply ever after.

    No I was just complaining about rising property taxes from Whites that are fleeing diversity enhanced areas. The suburban and rural tiers are pushed further and further from the city core.

    I also don’t support the gentrification of Black areas.

    Moving in gay and single Whites while leaving the schools in shambles is not progress. The single Whites eventually get married and flee to the burbs after realizing that they weren’t told everything about race. They however continue to support the system “for the cause” even if they know it is built on lies.

    I would like America to face the reality of race and end these cycles. Find some type of workable solution and abandon this system of lies. It just doesn’t work. It’s so much worse than people realize. We have tried lying to exhaustion and no one is benefitting.

  328. “An old wives tale? What exactly? Gaydar is something that comes from old women gossiping?”

    Laugh.

    My comment was specific to knowing when a black citizen is walking. But as I have experienced, One of the irritations in my life has been the number of people who assumed that I engaged same relational conduct.

    Laugh.

    While it might possible in some very liberal obvious circumstances, I suspect more men have been accused than actually so engage. As a single person, especially at my age, I find myself second guessing a lot more than used to. It has taken me years to agree to use antifungal medication for my athlete’s feet and nail fungus.

    Instead of the new freedoms creating more freedom it has exacerbated — one’s self consciousness.

    Laugh.

  329. folkvangr says:
    @Anonymous

    Since you asked here is my problem.
    The filth is everywhere: government, military, schools, kindergartens, movies, news, libraries, restaurants. It’s aggressive and in-your-face. It mocks and insults you. The satanic mob of dirty psycopaths is getting more brazen and vile every day. Some are telling me it’s part of our culture. Well, this is my answer to them: If the smell of a decomposing corpse is so pleasant to you, you might be as good as dead yourself already. lol

  330. @Passing By

    Just hypocrisy, up to a point. Hating the hateful is not necessarily a bad thing.

  331. anon[202] • Disclaimer says:

    Gay article

    pshh

    • Replies: @Psychotic Break
  332. @Trinity

    If you think about it, what you have said involves us in the innate superiority of heterosexuality from the ground up. For it involves us in the checks and balances both cultural and biological which moderate the extremes of the male and female sexes. You have identified a particular strength of male and female union, that it exactly moderates and satiates an otherwise ‘quenchless fire’ in a biological sense; and to this one may also add a second particular strength of heterosexuality, that it has in a closely intertwined chicken-and-egg cultural sense evolved its own appropriate institutions of courtship and thus still further moderation of male and female sexual behavior.

    The attempt to impose institutions of biological and cultural moderation of homosexual sexual behavior would fail on the first count because of the unnatural nature of the union; and on the second count because the appropriate institutions of heterosexuality, its culture of courtship, arises optimally from a behaviour which is natural in the first place. Conversely, an unnatural sexual behavior would give rise to an inappropriate institution of non-courtship; lest this designation should seem obscure, let one remove the estrangement from it and note the form it takes! For the culture of hooking up and having sex soon after meeting is exactly such an inappropriate institution of non-courtship, with the whole setup involving little supervision such as that by heterosexual parents and their mature associates of nascent heterosexual couples.

    In sum, a fish out of water would flop around.

    In more general response to the original article upon which we are commenting:

    I much appreciated and found it measured, objective, and fascinating; the latter for the simple reason that one can confirm much of it from the inside out, from the other side of the divide.

    I write all the above as one who has been celibate since early 2015, at which time one inexplicably lost interest in the seedy, promiscuous lifestyle which one had been leading. I had no idea what was going on but it felt peaceful and right not to sleep around or with men. Then, 9 months later, I was just in my living room as normal when suddenly acknowledgement and belief in Jesus as God welled up in my heart and I understood without having to ask among other things that one could never sleep with men again. At the time when this sudden gift of belief occurred one did not believe in or like Christianity.

    What I learned from God and thus the message I tell other gay people is that the commandment against homosexuality is not the capricious rule of a petty tyrant but a warning not to violate the structure and order of the universe. If people literally engage in the consummation of homosexuality, bestiality, adultery, incest, then they are figuratively slapping the marriage of Love and Wisdom in the face. To be clear, male and female relationships are reflected in the highest sense in the Love and Wisdom of God. If we do not follow the proper pattern laid down by God, then whether we understand it or not we have said No to the marriage of Love with the ideation appropriate to the execution of Love. One hopes that people will profit from this and better understand why the sexual rules of the Word, being hardwired into the nature of the universe and God, are essential and not capricious.

    From a natural point of view, one would note the following:

    The attraction of male to female consists of a basket of different genetic and cultural factors. The existence of a given factor necessarily involves the existence of mutations of that given factor; in such wise that the existence of human reproduction itself involves the inevitable incidence of people with, for instance, only one chromosome. It is the same with every such given factor: the existence of the healthy expression thereof is the existence of the botched versions which inevitably come off the production line.

    With these considerations laid, consider now the bromance by which heterosexual males bond with one another and the concomitant female friendships which also consist of a basket of different genetic and cultural factors. The implication here is that the very existence of healthy bromantic mechanisms or the female version inevitably involves also the botched versions spoken of above in the context of human reproduction: in other words, some people are born with excessive levels of the mechanism which brings male and female friendships with others of the same sex together in as it were fraternities and sororities. This sort of aberrant version of bromantic attraction and fraternal mechanisms would likely be genetic; and one is further convinced of this by the fact that 2 out of 3 children in one’s immediate family ended up in a gay relationship at some point in their lives.

    Thus have the primary facets been considered.

  333. @anon

    Gay article

    That you hastened to, by accident.

  334. And then we have situations like this(not the only one I have read about) –

    https://townhall.com/tipsheet/miacathell/2023/01/17/zulock-case-pt-1-n2618219

  335. Anonymous[147] • Disclaimer says:

    Homosexual sex is demonic. These queer orgasm addicts are under demonic possession…..and live to satiate the demands of their dopamine thrills. Nothing quite as repulsive as a squirrelly sex addict….queer or not.

  336. FKA Max says: • Website
    @SBaker

    I married one that was 23 when I was 27.

    You must have a very high SMV (Sexual Market Value) https://therationalmale.com/2014/03/26/preventative-medicine-part-ii/comment-page-3/ or https://archive.ph/TSw7p
    How tall are you?

    I think I have an extreme or maybe even a pathologically idealistic/altruistic K-strategy https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R/K_selection_theory approach to dating and mating. Predictability and loyalty trump youthfulness and fertility for me, at least for now.

    Luckily for me, my younger tall, blonde and blue-eyed sister has already had 2 boys with her tall, blond and blue-eyed husband (they are same-aged and both of them are MDs), so the pressure on me is not that high anymore to keep our particular family genotype and phenotype in circulation, plus my paternal great-grandfather did not have his first child (my grandfather) until he was 45, but my paternal great-grandmother was almost 25 years his junior. My maternal grandfather didn’t have his first child (my mother) until he was even older at 47, but again my maternal grandmother was about 19 years his junior. I will be 40 this May, so maybe not all hope is lost for me yet 😉 considering the delayed (gratification) mating/reproductive strategy of some of the males in both branches of my family. But I won’t biologically be able to have children with my current wife, due to the significant age gap.

  337. My observations of the scourge is that homosexuals all act the same. They lust to feel the sexual experience of the opposite sex, or to put it differently, their brains want a role reversal. To do this they are required to, they must, dehumanize people.The body must be subjective to whimsicle interpretation. This dehumanizing always manifests itself in their nonchalant attitude toward nudity. I often see weird expressions of the human anatomy in their houses, online personas, etc.. Once the body has become subjective its not a huge leap to transexual behavior.

    If all homosexuals act the same, it must then be impossible to be a biological reality. No other biological feature manifests itself so identically. These are communally learned behaviors.

    Like Agent Smith in The Matrix…. There is an organism that acts just like this within the Matrix…. an amoeba (yes in the movie he says virus).

    Homosexuals are filthy sinners in need of a version of reality that recognizes truth. They have disdained natural order and God’s truth.

  338. @Anymike

    Father Gerald Fitzpatrick and Father Patrick Fitzgerald does it for me and Bishop Accountability sums things up–corrupt and out of touch—–sick organization–a home for pedarists and shades of gay.

  339. @dogbumbreath

    We disagree; your comment is ludicrous.

    • Replies: @dogbumbreath
  340. anarchyst says:
    @Team of Donkies

    Even disgusting San Francisco sodomite Harvey Milk bragged about “getting them while they are young”. He prized buggering young boys below the age of consent.
    To add insult to injury, the U S Navy has named a ship after sodomite Harvey Milk. The ship is an “oiler”…
    Sick

    • Replies: @Non PC Infidel
  341. anarchyst says:
    @Anymike

    It’s the JEWS…it’s always the JEWS.
    Since the mainstream media is owned lock stock and barrel by JEWS, the Catholic Church was a prized target, being the arch nemesis of judaism.
    The Vatican II Ecumenical Council largely nullified the Catholic Church’s position on jewish culpability and responsibility for the crucifixion and death of Jesus Christ–a big mistake.

    • Agree: anonymouseperson
  342. @Twin Ruler

    You are absolutely correct on this point…

    Homosexual behavior ultimately begets human genocide, plain and simple!

  343. @Political Science 101

    Which part is ludicrous? FYI, dogma is not Science and there is a lot of dogma going around if you haven’t noticed.

    • Replies: @Political Science 101
  344. @anarchyst

    I’ve dealt with a number of homosexuals in the past both as part of a job I once had working in mental health and otherwise. One that I recall was very open about his grooming of underage boys. He claimed that it was best to get them young so they could be trained up sexually to “do what you wanted.” His behavior pattern was to find young boys from abusive homes, groom them, engage in love-bombing and gifts and then to molest them over a period of years until they “aged out” and were no longer appealing whereupon they’d be replaced. He self-reported that he usually would have a string of young boys he was molesting but would have a “primary” or “favorite” victim. However, he’d brainwash them all into believing that he really “loved” them and it would be “forever” -until he eventually discarded and replaced them as they “aged out.” He was what I’d call a serial molester as opposed to an opportunistic molester who targets random children for a “one time experience.” In talking about one of his victims, he seemed hurt and shocked because the victim had finally blown up and screamed at him, “YOU did this to me! You turned me into this! I hate you!” In terms of recruiting these victims to the “lifestyle” he said, “Today’s “trick” is tomorrow’s competition.”

    One opportunistic predator I worked with was eventually arrested at a McDonald’s restaurant where staff had taken him for lunch. He’d spotted a young child going into the restroom and, since the line to order was long, he plotted his attack and told the staff he needed to go to the restroom. He should have been accompanied but the staff apparently didn’t want to lose their place in line. Moments later, screams were heard coming from the restroom as he sexually attacked the child. Of course, the child was rescued and the molester arrested. The child turned out to be the son of cop who was present in the restaurant. At the trial, the judge said that the only way the molester could remain out of prison is that he’d have to be moved out into an isolated house surrounded by a tall fence and locked gate and that he’d no longer be allowed out in public. The parents objected most strenuously to this and were quite vehement about it and refused. So, that pretty much pissed off the judge and he sentenced him to prison as a repeat offender.

  345. Corrupt says:
    @Patrick McNally

    “Has anyone here ever seen examples of male dogs humping each other? I’ve seen it a number of times. It does seem like a certain amount of either homosexual or perhaps bisexual behavior occurs naturally in the wild”

    What you’re seeing is not sexual in nature, it’s the establishment of dominance.

  346. Thomm says:

    Refer back to my comments above #299 and #334 for more proof of WNs getting caught red-handed in a situation where they are unwilling to say that they would prefer a famously pretty woman over a man, as a sexual partner, or even say that the woman is the ‘less bad option’ of the two.

    When one combines this fact with the fact that homosexuality was created by nature as a mechanism to filter out genetic waste matter from further replication, everything makes sense.

    No discussion of race/HBD is complete without a deep examination of the unusually high variance in the quality of whites, which is revealed with research that I have posted here.

    The white genome has a special feature that ensures that all undesirable traits fall into a small fraction of the population (estimated at 10-20%), and the remaining 80-90% of us this remain fully free of flaws.

    This creates a bi-modal distribution of white ‘quality’. Hence, white quality is not even a continuum, but rather a functional race of exceptional people, daylight in between, and a defective subrace where 10-20% reside. This subrace effectively functions as a wastebasket into which unwanted genetic waste is dumped, for efficient removal from our genome.

    The quality of the parents has no bearing on whether their offspring will be functional or a member of this ‘wastebasket’ subrace. Poor, uneducated white parents still produce functional offspring 80-90% of the time, while even the most impressive parents produce an offspring designed for wastebasket purposes 10-20% of the time. In that way, the white genome is very egalitarian as far as which parents are going to bear the misfortune of a boy that becomes a WN faggot, or a girl that becomes a radical feminist.

    Since this defective subrace is not meant to reproduce, it entirely explains why the men become White Trashionalists, while the women become the fat bluehaired feminists. Both of these groups are equal in number, and neither has a significant presence of people from the other gender.

    More proof :

    In the 2020 election, we saw that at least 54% of white women voted for Trump and downticket GOP candidates. Yet the White Trashionalist community has virtually zero women in it, aside from a couple of elderly fag hags (Rosie and Alden, in the case of this website). The WN community obviously has nothing to do with the GOP or support of President Trump.

    How can there be no women? Could it have something to do with the fact that 40%+ of WNs openly and proudly say that :

    i) They would rather have sex with a white man than a famously pretty mulatto or quatroon woman (like 1970s Pam Grier or 1990s Halle Berry), since racial loyalty trumps sexual orientation, and producing no baby is better than producing a mulatto baby.
    ii) They have no problem with transgenderism, since the race of the person did not change, so nothing meaningfully changed about their suitability as a sexual partner.

    This pattern becomes evident from viewing the comments on any WN-heavy website. The overwhelming homosexuality of the WN community is just one of the reasons that the ideology will never be able to recruit heterosexuals.

    Politics is a circle, and that is why WNs and antifags freely cross over, given the almost total ideological similarities between the two. In fact, participating in antifa-type activities gives WN wiggers rare access to the females of their defective subrace. Hence, when the police round up the degenerates, the photos of arrestees looks like this :

    Notice how defective they look, from their faces alone. They are too far removed from the functional white race to be considered members of the same race. Once again, politics is a circle, and WNs and antifags freely cross over into each others’ ranks (see : Andrew Anglin). The two should not even be distinguished, for reasons described above.

    • Replies: @mulga mumblebrain
  347. @Thomm

    You do know that you are raving mad, don’t you. Surely you must have a suspicion. I reckon the SS would have rejected you as quite plainly rabid.

  348. @Non PC Infidel

    Bull-shit from start to finish. Another sicko.

    • Replies: @Non PC Infidel
  349. @Team of Donkies

    All hate-crazed bigots vomit the same filth, but you are exceptionally sick.

  350. Jimmy Way says:
    @emerging majority

    Good riddance, homosexual.

    • Replies: @John Johnson
  351. Thomm says:

    Here are more articles and discussions about how homosexuality is now the central premise of White Nationalism, with prominent WNs advocating more of this :

    https://www.counter-currents.com/2010/10/homosexuality-and-white-nationalism/

    https://tinyurl.com/efjpfrp2

    https://truthout.org/articles/white-nationalist-groups-are-splitting-over-gay-inclusion/

  352. @mulga mumblebrain

    You seem like the kind of person who throws a fit every time you hear something you don’t like. I can visualize you know- ranting and raving as you apoplectically pound your desk with your fist, face beet red, spittle flying from you lips as you shriek, “Lies! Lies! All lies!” like an old-style Soviet Union diplomat. You’re a caricature, a cartoon and a buffoon.

    • Replies: @mulga mumblebrain
  353. Angharad says:
    @Non PC Infidel

    Child rapers need to be executed. Period. The end. They never ever stop. So they need to BE stopped, forever.

  354. @Jimmy Way

    Good riddance, homosexual.

    He showed up in previous threads to tell us that homosexual sex among straight male adolescents would be the norm if not for societal pressure.

    The theory that most bisexual men are gays trying to convince themselves that they are straight really seems to be the case. To this day I have not met a self-described bisexual man but I have met gay men that were convinced that straight men are faking it for society. I knew a few self-described bisexual or bifriendly women and they all ended up with men. They basically touched some boobs in college and thought it earned them an alternative identity.

  355. @Non PC Infidel

    I get a little annoyed when faced by morons and hate-crazed bigots-nothing more. As I said, I believe, from reading your garbage, that you are both, and an impertinent liar, in the service of hate, as well.

    • Replies: @Non PC Infidel
  356. @mulga mumblebrain

    Your “beliefs” and “annoyance” resulting from those beliefs are strictly your problem. You have to live with them, I don’t. Screaming that something you don’t like to hear is nothing but lies is rather pathetic as is your automatically declaring anything said (that you don’t like) to be nothing but the product of hate and bigotry. You’re like a child who is told there are no cookies left in the jar who keeps screaming, “You’re lying! Yes, there are!” so I’ll leave you to your tantrum. Good luck with that.

  357. Thomm says:

    I actually wrote an entire song that WNs used to ratify their homosexuality. They eagerly used this as their theme song.

    From the archives, I hereby re-post this epic song, ‘Little Shop of Wiggers‘ :

    First, it follows the beat of ‘Mean Green Mother’ from ‘Little Shop of Horrors’ :

    The new lyrics to be placed in that beat are :

    I’m just a WN wigger, obsessed with race,
    And I am mad.
    I’m just a WN wigger, obsessed with race,
    And it looks like I’ve been haaaaad.
    I’m just a WN wigger, obsessed with race,
    Smarter whites always put me back in my place,
    I’m enviously green!
    And I look……BAD!


    I’m just a WN wigger, obsessed with race,
    My IQ does severely lag.
    I’m just a WN wigger, obsessed with race,
    And I want others to hold the baaaaag…
    I’m just a WN wigger, obsessed with race,
    I smear the jizz of other men all ova mah face,
    I’m a meany queeeen!
    And I am a….. FAG!

    _________________________________________

    Notice how perfectly the verses rhyme. Such is my talent.

    This is a superb song that encapsulates everything that WN wiggers are about. They should continue to use this as their theme song with pride!

  358. @EliteCommInc.

    ““to date there is no biological marker that indicates a cause to the conduct. It is doubtful that one will ever be found.” That was as far back as the 1980’s or early 90’s”

    MARKER. He said there was no “biological marker,” BUT there is LOT of evidence! In fact, compelling evidence.

    And in addition to confounding evidence more broadly with narrow “markers” (just one kind of evidence), you may also be confusing biological with genetic. Even if differences in sexual orientation or behavior were not in part the result of genetic differences, it could still be biological. Biological does not always mean genetic.

    Nevertheless, many studies have calculated the heritability (genetic variance) of sexual orientation or behavior, and while it is not has high as, for example, the heritability of smoking, it still makes a non-trivial contribution.

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
$
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All RockaBoatus Comments via RSS
PastClassics
The Surprising Elements of Talmudic Judaism
How America was neoconned into World War IV
Analyzing the History of a Controversial Movement