The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 Jack Dalton Archive
Musk Takes Twitter. Is Left Right to be Terrified?
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

Earlier: Ellen K. Pao In Jeff Bezos’ WASHINGTON POST On Elon Musk: We Must “Prevent Rich People From Controlling Our Channels Of Communication”

As a Twitter shareholder of record since late 2018, when the stock was trading around \$28 per share, I am naturally delighted by Elon Musk’s dramatic \$54.20 per share takeover of the social media platform, which he says he intends to take private [Elon Musk acquires Twitter for roughly \$44 billion, by Douglas MacMillan, Faiz Siddiqui, Rachel Lerman and Taylor Telford, Washington Post, April 25, 2022].

I’m even more delighted by the Ruling Class reaction: free speech on the platform will be anti-democratic and the free flow of information might come to a grinding halt. The same people didn’t think that when Amazon bazillionaire Jeff Bezos bought The Washington Post to ensure that democracy doesn’t “die in darkness.”

The good thing is, Musk is buying Twitter, he says, to keep it a free marketplace of ideas, including those that these communist commissars want banned. The bad thing is, no one knows how he’ll change its culture of repression, or whether he will permit the anonymous accounts that protect dissidents from reprisals

Never before has the power of a statement made in 140 characters or less exposed the fragility of what many on the Right derisively call The Global American Empire. Our rulers, no longer worrying being constrained by the dead letter known as the US Constitution, believe they have carte blanche to control the free flow of information, censoring any individual or even news organization they see fit (the Hunter Biden laptop story from the New York Post), realize what Musk’s bid to acquire Twitter and restore free discourse means.

The popular Twitter user, Auron MacIntyre, compiled a breakdown of the most revealing Leftist tweets about Musk’s purchase of Twitter. Two samples:

  • “Today on Twitter feels like the last evening in a Berlin nightclub at the twilight of Weimar Germany,” journalism professor Jeff Jarvis tweeted in an amusing Reductio ad Hitlerum.

  • Max Boot, an anti-white, pro-interventionist pundit, got the vapors and collapsed on his fainting couch: “I am frightened by the impact on society and politics if Elon Musk acquires Twitter. He seems to believe that on social media anything goes. For democracy to survive, we need more content moderation, not less.”

  • Former Labor Secretary Robert Reich fumed “His goal is his own unconstrained freedom—the freedom to wield enormous power without having to be accountable to laws and regulations, to shareholders, or to market competition.”

Read the rest here.

Musk’s move to buy Twitter does not mean he is our guy, even if one does wonder what the South African born entrepreneur thinks about post-Apartheid South Africa. But then again, he’s not not our guy . His enemies are our enemies, the very Tech Totalitarians who have silenced important voices on the right: Alex Jones to Laura Loomer to Jared Taylor to Stefan Molyneux. (VDARE.com is still on Twitter, probably because it has pulled its punches, but has been banned by Facebook, PayPal, Amazon etc.) Yet such personalities had audiences an order of magnitude greater than Warner Media’s \$300 million failed CNN+ could muster. That effort sank like a rock just a month after start-up. Fewer than 10,000 people were interested [CNN+ fails, shut down after only one month, SaraCarter.com, April 21, 2022].

 

At the end of 2021, Musk correctly called “Wokeness” a “mind virus” that threatens civilization. Bonus: He said it during an interview with the The Babylon Bee, the right-of-center, Christian satire site that Twitter banned for poking fun at Biden’s No. 2 health official, “Admiral” Richard “Rachel” Levine, a man who pretends he is a woman.

The Babylon Bee is a satirical website, similar to The Onion, which Musk noted has become “politically correct.” During his interview, Tesla and SpaceX CEO noted that a tendency to become politically correct may be counterproductive, as represented by the emerging “woke culture.” According to Musk, “wokeness” is a “mind virus” that could become “arguably one of the biggest threats to modern civilization.”

“Wokeness wants to make comedy illegal. Do we want a humorless society that is simply rife with condemnation, and hate? At its heart, wokeness is divisive, exclusionary, and hateful. It basically gives mean people a shield to be cruel, armored in false virtue,” Musk said.

[Elon Musk talks “wokeness,” Elizabeth Warren, the Metaverse, and more in Babylon Bee interview, by Maria Merano, Teslarati.com, December 22, 2021]

Musk said the same thing about Netflix, home to such invigorating shows as the rabidly anti-white Dear White People, the historical illiterate Vikings: Valhalla (complete with a black Norwegian ruler) and the shockingly pro-black cowboy movie The Harder They Fall—where the black cowboys kill only white people, Subsequently, Netflix saw the biggest one-day stock drop in market history (due to declining streaming subscribers) [Netflix Loses \$54 Billion in Market Cap After Biggest One-Day Stock Drop Ever, by Todd Spangler, Variety, April 20, 2022].

Musk said the subscriber and stock price crashes occurred because Netflix was infected by the “Woke mind virus” and has become “unwatchable” [Elon Musk says ‘woke mind virus’ makes Netflix ‘unwatchable’, by Ariel Zibler, New York Post, April 20, 2022].

Were it not for Twitter in 2015 and 2016 and free speech across Big Tech platforms, Donald Trump would not have been elected. Nor would he have been defeated in 2020 if not for Big Tech’s censorship. Time’s Molly Ball even bragged about the underhanded collusion to elect Joe Biden [The Secret History of the Shadow Campaign That Saved the 2020 Election, February 6, 2021]. Such was the hatred for Trump and his backers that Facebook tycoon Mark Zuckerberg spent more than \$400 million to manipulate elections in 2020 [How ‘Zuckerbucks’ helped swing the 2020 election for Biden: Facebook CEO funneled \$419M into ‘nonprofit’ local election admin boards ‘to help turn out likely Democratic voters’, by Alyssa Guzman , Daily Mail, October 14, 2021].

Message from the Left: Zuckerberg’s influencing elections is saving democracy; Musk’s buying Twitter will destroy it even though he proposes to allow more free speech.

Like Joe Rogan, another free-speech champion the Left attacked with its customary brio partly because he challenged the Flu Manchu narrative, Musk knows the game is rigged against free speech, which those of us who defend the Historic American Nation must have to fight those pushing for The Great Replacement.

One worrisome note. Twitter users are worried that Musk will ban anonymous accounts, which are crucial to those who wish to speak freely without having their lives wrecked by crazy Leftists who call employers and threaten families. Verifying accounts and dumping spam bots and obvious scammers is one thing. But stopping good Americans from speaking freely by banning anonymous accounts simply isn’t acceptable.

In some sense, then, Musk’s fight is our fight. His acquiring Twitter and taking it private will be one small step forward in the battle for restoring western civilization, but a giant leap against the Wokeness that now controls the Regime MSM and corporate America.

Jack Dalton [Email him] is a recovering conservative.

(Republished from VDare by permission of author or representative)
 
Hide 154 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. roonaldo says:

    The nerve of the guy, criticizing the wokearati, and threatening to undermine our sacred democracy by potentially allowing open discussion of issues.

    As my grandson’s critical race theory infused U.S. History text reminds us, we must heed the wisdom of our nation’s founder, Ekwatina Kehinde, who said, “I may not agree with what you say, but I will defend with my life your right to face torture and prison for saying it.”

  2. In some sense, then, Musk’s fight is our fight.

    Unless the author is a billionaire, I see that statement as nonsense. Super Rich people buying everything in the nation will benefit only them, no matter what your politics.

    • Agree: raga10, Liza, mocissepvis, W
    • Replies: @dina
    , @Exile
    , @ld
    , @Legba
    , @Anon
  3. Anon[271] • Disclaimer says:

    I suspect one thing important to Musk is the anti-white male campaign the left is pushing. Musk knows better than most who builds and innovates in Western society, namely white males.

    But even more importantly, Musk comes from a culture where whites are being cancelled far more savagely than in the US: South Africa. Whites built South Africa, yet innocent whites are being killed all over South Africa by blacks, and the blacks in power do nothing protect them. South Africa under black rule is a nightmare.

    Musk knows it can happen here too if we let it. If he didn’t come from South Africa, he’d be more of a typical noodle-headed tech boss leftist like Bill Gates or Jeff Bezos. The latter are utter fools about politics.

    • Agree: sulu, Pat Kittle, Atle
  4. Karl1906 says:

    Fuck Musk. And don’t fall for this shit show! The US-establishment would have NEVER allowed him to become rich if he wasn’t reliable in regards to their cause. And he’s certainly not a good business man to begin with.

    And even if he actually believed in anything he currently says – it’s the same as with Trump. No matter WHAT he may be ABLE to achieve they will NEVER let him get away with it in the end. Even if they have to murder him.

    In Trump’s case you don’t even have to wait for 2024 – just wait and see what happens this November! Same shit show, same result. They will dig out yet another 80 million, 160 million, BILLION voters for the other candidate. Same happened and will happen in France, Canada, Australia etc.

    • Agree: Towey, Liza, mocissepvis
  5. Biff says:

    Nothing is going to fundamentally change. The Satanic regime in Washington is propped up on a mountain of lies, and the sequestering of the truth/truth tellers is of upmost importance. If Twitter does become, even a slight haven, for the truth tellers it will be attacked by the establishment’s thousands of minions who are already on the job silencing, canceling, dividing, and doxing anyone who doesn’t atone to the narrative.

    Stifle your expectations.

  6. Anymike says:

    I would say, the left should be scared because there no longer will be unanimity among the leaders of the tech monopolies. If the others try concerted action to erode the value of Twitter, Elon Musk will have unlimited funds to finance legal action against them on antitrust and other ground.

    If the other social media monopolies try get Section 230 repealed, Musk can stand against them. In Musk, they finally will be facing someone with more financial firepower than they have. He may be able to recruit allies against them from within the corporate world too.

  7. raga10 says:

    I wish I could say that I will leave Twitter in protest, but I was never on it in the first place…

    I’ll only point out that Musk’s commitment to free speech never extended to his own critics.

    • LOL: Towey
  8. Rodga says:

    He’s part of the system to be where he is at, and for the media to be kissing his ass so much and not going after him.

  9. Ghali says:

    At least, Musk is not a Zionist Jew. Most if not all U.S. media outlets are controlled by Neofascist Zionist Jews.

    • Agree: Atle
    • Replies: @JWalters
    , @Stones
    , @Tucker
  10. Musk is no one’s savoir. He has a shadowy past including associations with intelligence agencies as well as a strange relationship with the “dead” Epstein. Almost all the persons screaming about Musk are F…..ing Jews! He will be ganged banged by the Jews and Israel if he does anything that allows any criticisms of their deceit, murder, and control of the world. Those of you who think anything will really change have no idea how much control these people have over the social, economic, and political pathways of the world.

    If Musk gets out of line he will end up like Epstein and I think he knows that. The Jews have become so bold they no longer even try to hide what they are doing because they have become the “Ultimate Victims” and have beaten Western Civilization into the ground with White Privilege espoused by their “Communist” Goy Friends and their trained and highly paid Black Whores.

    Just take a look at what these Jewish Bastards have done with the Ukraine war. They have complete control over everything while they make billions from the arms manufacturers. They aren’t worried about Musk. They already have plan and they will begin to execute it immediately. There was reason Hitler rose to power. The Jews did similar things in Germany.

    Europe is done and America is doomed and any new owner of Twitter won’t make any difference. It’s all a simple little plan and the Intel Agencies thank you for your posts on Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, and all the apps you have on your phone that continually give info to all of them.

    You are fools! As George Carlin put it,” It’s private club and you ain’t in it. You got the mother…….. and the Jews will make sure you know it.

  11. JWalters says:

    Research has shown that companies which allow anonymous feedback from employees get more honest, hence useful, feedback.

    The writers of the 1st Amendment knew all about “misinformation” in politics. But they decided to tolerate it in order to foster freedom of speech and discussion. They decided to let the people debate and think for themselves.

    “Sticks and stones may break my bones, but names can never hurt me.” For example, merely calling someone an “anti-Semite” for criticizing Israel’s crimes does not hurt them. Getting them fired hurts.

    Spam blockers used to be used to block posts with foul language. Now they are used to block posts with links to information revealing the oligarchy. The oligarchy (and their pathetic, cowardly patsies in the press and Congress) have not been censoring me because they are merely arrogant. It’s because they are criminals. On a mind-boggling, sociopathic scale.

    I’ve been censored many times (not at UR), and it has always been the most solidly documented, carefully reasoned, compelling information that gets censored. And especially information about Israel and the financing behind Israel. Which is also the financing behind our censoring press and politicians.

    • Agree: Atle
    • Replies: @nokangaroos
  12. JWalters says:
    @Ghali

    Putin surprised his Zionist backers by eventually putting the Russian people ahead of the oligarchs.

  13. JWalters says:
    @niteranger

    “They have complete control over everything”

    It looks to me like they thought they had complete control over everything. But now that arrogance is leading to the wheels coming off their wagon.

  14. anonymous[206] • Disclaimer says:

    seems it will be easy for Google, Bing etc to start banning or shadow-banning Musk Twitter, eliminating tweets from searches etc … plus hitting it with de-platforming bans by MasterCard / Visa etc

    this could end up being the dumbest spending of 44 billion ever … at 80x the cost of the foolish Murdoch purchase of MySpace just before that imploded

    raising the question of why didn’t Musk just spend a measly billion or so to upgrade Gab

    4channers are eager to know –
    what will Musk Twitter policy be on the n-word
    what will Musk Twitter policy be on the JQ

    or is Musk Twitter just going to be another slightly adjusted Gettr – Parler – Truth Social

    • Replies: @Abbybwood
  15. @niteranger

    You are fools! As George Carlin put it,” It’s private club and you ain’t in it. You got the mother…….. and the Jews will make sure you know it.

    You’re right about anti-White genocidal Jews, but some of us goyim aren’t about to give up.

    BTW, George Carlin was simply more controlled opposition. He made a lucrative career out of bad-mouthing the “private club” — without ever revealing (((who))) was in it.

  16. Musk Takes Twitter. Is Left Is Right to be Terrified?

    Excellent observations, but I think you have a typo in your title line.

  17. Franz says:

    Pay no attention to that man in front of the curtain, he’s there to baffle you. Like the rest of them.

    Freedom died in the media long time ago. Good, we’re all the way back the square one: Trust those you know and those who gave you the straight dope in the past.

    We should never have given one ounce of trust to mass media.

  18. I’m so glad Elon Musk – did it!

    Free speech is the essence of the West.

    Elon Musk and Joe Rogan are a great friendship duo!

    (A cage-fight-commenter and an entrepreneur – a free-speech dream team!)

    • Replies: @Rev. Spooner
    , @Realist
  19. Dumbo says:

    I never understood what’s the relevancy of Twitter anyway, so, I guess for me nothing changes that much. If this leads to less censorship there and the current Indian in charge goes away, great, but it doesn’t change things in general.

    • Replies: @Mefobills
  20. Stones says:
    @Ghali

    I am very positive about Musk and his buyout of twitter.

    Decades ago , pre-internet, liberal TV entrepreneur Ted Turner made a well-above-market-price offer for CBS. There was panic among the media owners that a Gentile would own one of the, then, three major news sources. They successfully headed off Turner’s attempt to control CBS by enlisting a Jewish real estate mogul to keep control in the “proper” hands.

    This time a Gentile has succeeded.

    My view is that the propagation of the “narrative” depends largely on a consistent and wide spread message with no serious counter messages available. Thus the censorship. With Elan Musk at Twitter they will have a problem. Musk is extremely intelligent with not only tech decisions but people as well. He is street wise in an uncommon way.

    Though with mostly disappointments in the past for a leader who will sustain the battle for our historical nation, we just may have found our General. Don’t knock hope. It’s a part of winning..

  21. Another hierarch achieves freedom of expression, one day this will touch the population.

  22. Canute says:

    Musk has remained something of an enigma to me. The Tesla/Electric Vehicle trend – adored by those who seek to have liberty strangled, continues to be treated as a source of wealth creation despite its dangers, functional limitations and dwindling grid capacity for support. However, I admire his courage to speak out against the obvious tyranny of the substantially Jewish drive for centralized control of all life and “truth.” In the end, if he is feared and loathed by Zionist mouthpieces like Robert Reich and Max Boot, I must in fact….love him.

  23. Tucker says:
    @Ghali

    I prefer to have a let us wait and see attitude, with regards to Elon Musk’s purchase of Twitter. Which, I would like to point out – I have never used or had even a tiny interest in ever using at any time in the future.

    Regarding your comment that Musk not being a zionist jew – this reminded me of an article I came across a few days ago that was claiming that Elon Musk was jewish. Here is an excerpt from the article; form your own conclusions:

    “I think it because Musk’s entire Wikipedia page and bio reads like a red flag. It is
    nothing but transparent BS from top to bottom. We’ll start with his family. His mother’s maiden name is Haldeman. That is a prominent Jewish name. Elon is also a Jewish name, meaning “oak” in Hebrew. Kimbal, Elon’s brother, also has a Jewish name. So why not just admit they are Jewish? I don’t know. Maybe they plan on running him for Governor of California or something.

    In all fairness, I would also mention that I have seen a few tweets that supposedly came from Musk where he is making sarcastic inferences as to how we all know ‘who owns and controls the mainstream media’. So, if he is jewish – it might be possible that he is one of the extremely rare exceptions to the rule, with regards to him not being a mortal enemy to all White European people worldwide.

    As are the majority of his fellow tribesmen and women.

    • Replies: @Johan
    , @Patricus
  24. @Karl1906

    Why would they bother to rig Australian elections. Both major parties identical ideologies. One party replaces the other and continues down the same path as the replaced party.

  25. My advice to anyone trying to discuss the JQ on Twitter, which was never an option under Dorsey, is to wait a few months after the transfer to Musk. Maybe the “online hate” monitors will have their let their guard down a little by then. And start out in baby steps with seemingly innocuous leading questions. Then build from there.

    I wouldn’t make a good Michael Corleone: “Never tell anyone what you are thinking.”

  26. @niteranger

    Perhaps strangely the solution will come from Musk himself……a new beginning, a new mayflower…….to a new planet. Mars. A Mars free of Jews and other infectants. A new society shall arise from the ashes of Earth.

  27. Another writer who pretends that by not naming and shaming the one true enemy of the West, the struggle to reconquest will be a cinch … like the 800-pound gorilla in the room.

  28. Realist says:

    In some sense, then, Musk’s fight is our fight. His acquiring Twitter and taking it private will be one small step forward in the battle for restoring western civilization, but a giant leap against the Wokeness that now controls the Regime MSM and corporate America.

    We’ll see about that…chicken counting before they hatch is a bad idea.

    Instead of depending on a White knight billionaire…the U.S. populace better fight for their own salvation.

  29. Realist says:
    @Ukraine Tiger

    Why would they bother to rig Australian elections. Both major parties identical ideologies. One party replaces the other and continues down the same path as the replaced party.

    But that also goes for the United States.

  30. Anon[205] • Disclaimer says:

    The Twitter purchase is entertaining and will remain so for some time. Musk has given the Wokesters the first spoonful of their own medicine.

    Some people act like shits and enjoy it when only they are playing. When the tables are turned the laughter turns to tears.

    The thief gets angry when he is ripped off, the betrayer when betrayed and the liar when deceived.

    The Wokesters and Cancel Culture crowd, snowflakes all, will now be at the other end of the whip. Retribution is sweet, revenge sweeter.

    • Agree: SBaker
  31. Johan says:

    There was a debate concerning freedom of speech which Musk allegedly is trying to protect, and the question was again raised whether it is good or not if people are allowed to say and write about anything. Twitter and in general social media are systems for democratic mobs and their pundits however, Twitter is a system where the assertive mobs and their mediocre talking heads over-shout anyone else. These mobs and peoples celebrities are inherently limited in freedom of speech, and they are inherently by their mediocre nature oppressing freedom of speech. Maintaining freedom of speech for democratic mobs and their talking heads is actually THE way of oppressing everyone else, something which every good demagogue knows. There is no risk at all that on Twitter someone will come up with something which is not already thought of by any of the others which are part of the collectivist mediocrity. Thus the debate, whether on the left or on the right, is once again about a pseudo problem. The debate is rather about something else, democracy is the war of the people against the people, a feast of hate, and it is this feast of hate getting out of control which is the problem.

  32. dina says:
    @Zachary Smith

    You are absolutely right Mr Smith

  33. TGD says:

    The capital being raised in support of Musk’s takeover should be deployed to modernize American industry and to restart industries that have closed. But the USA is now an “advanced service economy” where the manipulation of financial instruments is the main economic engine. Stupid, stupid and stupid to the google power.

    • Agree: Angharad, HdC
  34. Verifying accounts and dumping spam bots and obvious scammers is one thing. But stopping good Americans from speaking freely by banning anonymous accounts simply isn’t acceptable.

    Just as Bitcoin has no value if it can be controlled by government, Twitter has no value if one can’t post using a pseudonym.

    What use is it to be able to speak one’s mind if some activist can dox you and harass your family or get you fired?

    • Replies: @Realist
  35. bwuce wee says:

    trump was attempting to create a sort of conservative twitter. not sure if it would have really amounted to much, BUT, musk just blew trump out of the water, because now twitter can be ‘conservative’ friendly, so trump is left holding the bag on an enterprise that will likely have to be flushed. so in reality, the left should be celebrating the fact that musk defeated trump and checkmated his truth social. of course the left are ungrateful crybabies to the last irrelevant pronoun! in my opinion, twitter is a narcissistic echo chamber for celebrities, groupies, and wannabees- who are all losers IMO. twitter started becoming news articles over 10 years ago and i’m like WTF? you are quoting twitter as your source in a news article? that is insanely retarded. but then building a super-expensive electric car that runs over people, with a battery that often catches fire and burns the whole enchilada to a cinder, and uses gas to charge the battery is just as useless and insanely retarded as twitter. so the ‘guy who builds the most expensive inefficient vehicle, buys the most useless communication enterprise’ for 44 billion- yeah- makes a lot of sense. and it would not surprise me if he bought disney next!!! hehheh

    • Replies: @Bro43rd
  36. Musk didn’t “buy” anything; his line of credit allowed for the acquisition.

    Now, for a few quotes, attributed to Julian Assange:

    Facebook has all of your friends wearing a wire;

    YouTube has you in the dock, talking to the judge;

    Twitter is a police interview that never ends

    Speaking for myself, I do NOT have a Facebook account, nor have I ever posted ANYTHING on Twitter…

    • Agree: Pierre de Craon
  37. Emslander says:

    Were it not for Twitter in 2015 and 2016 and free speech across Big Tech platforms, Donald Trump would not have been elected.

    And CNN broadcast the Trump rallies in full throughout the campaign.

    Freedom of speech and expression was a Left-Wing value until Donald Trump was elected. The arrogant MSM and social media must have believed that Trump talk was outside the digestible opinions of voters like themselves. The Left thought that they represented acceptable winning opinion, regardless of the distance their financial and social policies became from those preferred by the average dull-witted American citizen.

    Allowing Trump to go on with all that populist craziness would be good for Hilary in the election, they believed, right up to the end. She reflected that view in her campaigning by characterizing all of us dolts as “deplorables”. That was the arrogant whale’s opinion very near to the date of the election. She was seriously self-deluded.

    Trump’s win shocked them out of their transgender underwear. The reaction to that shock has been to champion censorship in all settings, from internet sites to school boards.

    Censorship is a panicked reaction to the impending demise of a political train of thought. Musk is going to make a lot of money opening up his Twitter, because that’s what the vast majority of people want. It’s an untapped market right now.

  38. TG says:

    Is this really going to change anything? No idea. We have had rogue billionaires try to at least sort of represent the working class – Ross Perot and Donald Trump come to mind – but as others point out, even they were no match for the united power of all the other billionaires. Most likely, even if Musk is sincere, he also will be crushed/cancelled. Still, one can always hope.

    It is kind of funny how even before this, the establishment really hated Musk. Yes he was a bit of a showman, and yes he sucked up a lot of government subsidies (but then what billionaire doesn’t?) but he did create real things like actual economical reusable rocket ships. I mean, rockets that land vertically like in old Buck Rogers movies! He did that! All those billionaires making money by sucking up banking bailouts must be jealous.

    There have been previous wealthy people who sucessfully championed the working class – Teddy Roosevelt and FDR come to mind – it does happen. Although to a great extent, these people were not fighting the entire establishment, they did have allies in the upper classes. Possibly because their fellow rich were afraid of revolution. The big problem may be that our ruling class no longer feels threatened, they feel like they no longer need to worry about revolution or collapse, they can step on the rest of us without consequence.

  39. Johan says:
    @Tucker

    On media like UNZ the authors ideologically lie that Jews are the cause of decline of white culture, democracy regardless of political flavour is first and major cause of decline, Jews are merely speeding up the process in various ways. These authors are using the inordinate, and granted, illegitimate power of Jews to create scapegoats.
    Smart Jews promote democracy because they know this is the system which produces decline and degeneration. Like Nietzsche wrote, the system of a waning type of man. Some Jews then swing to a certain side in a democracy, for instance protecting, feeding and funding the culturally destructive progressives. Jews have individual preferences too, they are not all George Soros, some might have reasons to dislike ‘progressives’ (which are merely the sophists of which the ancient Greeks spoke, they are a typical phenomenon of democracy). At large Jews instinctively know that democracy is the means, in whatever way. Jews maintain intelligence and tradition, which cannot be said of the waning type of democratic whites all over the spectrum.
    Divide, destroy, and rule.

    • Agree: Emslander
    • Replies: @Swaytonious
  40. Ktulu says:

    My money is on Musk removing anonymity but allowing free speech. This is probably better than what we have because people who are already public can behave as outlets for what the people behind them have to say but it will not be the golden age of 2016-2017 twitter.

  41. ARepli says:

    Twitter being taken over by a totalitarian dictator? Finally, the country is getting back track.

    Yes, here at Unz, the deep meaning of freedom is uncovered: Alex Jones’ whistling must be heard!

    Great news for white American culture warriors! Cancellation can get back to the right priorities.

    • Replies: @GenFranco
  42. Angharad says:

    White Nationalists like Jazzhands are already banned.

  43. gotmituns says:

    Twitter my butt. Just another rich guy fooling around a bit – nothing will change

  44. When the stupid and shallow are made ‘intellectual’.

    • LOL: Agent76
    • Replies: @Agent76
  45. Exile says:
    @Zachary Smith

    This note of skepticism is needed.

    Regardless of how this purchase turns out, the underlying rot of plutocracy remains. It shouldn’t take the intervention of a rogue billionaire to protect political expression and break social engineering efforts on the private side. The corrupt collusion of private and public sector continues and it goes beyond Twitter and free speech. It includes all political and social policy and includes economics – the ability of anyone in America to live a life reasonably free of economic precarity and corporate control.

    We have a society where only billionaires have a real say and a shot at getting what they want. That still needs fixing.

    • Agree: Bro43rd, mocissepvis, W
  46. ld says:
    @Zachary Smith

    Thank You

    people cheering the ‘good’ billionaires

    we are doomed

  47. @Emslander

    “Freedom of speech and expression was a Left-Wing value until Donald Trump was elected.”

    I’m afraid that you are wrong on timeline positioning of the Left’s abandonment of freedom speech and expression. Sam Francis speaks of it approximately 25 years prior to Trump’s election.

    • Replies: @Stones
  48. GMC says:

    Truth and facts overrides Propaganda and the One World Order knows it. This is why Putins speeches are never fully aired in the USA { CWA } . They contain too much common sence and historical facts. Let’s see if Musk stupidly spent his money – after the FCC and others gets done with him.

  49. Legba says:
    @Zachary Smith

    Does it then follow that the proles need to rise up and kill the rich? I’m OK with that, by the way

    • Replies: @Zachary Smith
  50. @Johan

    We do not have a democracy.. we have a republic.. typical Jewish support got mob rule because they know they control the mob.

    • Replies: @Johan
  51. Notsofast says:

    maybe i’m missing something but i can’t think of any way he could possibly make twitter worse than it is.

  52. @Emslander

    And CNN broadcast the Trump rallies in full throughout the campaign.

    Freedom of speech and expression was a Left-Wing value until Donald Trump was elected.

    Sir: I suspect you’re looking at this from the wrong angle. The reason the “Liberal” Zionist/Corporate Media gave Trump a blank check with all the free publicity was to create him as the opposition candidate for Hillary. The Zionists knew Hillary would do everything they wanted, starting with the a no-fly zone in Syria.

    Just my opinion, but I suspect the woman is an End-Timer. Does anyone else recall her quiet prayer meetings with the rightwingnut Republicans?

    6) Clinton once attended prayer meetings with Republican Senators Sam Brownback and Rick Santorum.

    While a U.S. senator, Clinton attended a bipartisan prayer meeting, which included some of the Senate’s most conservative Republicans, like Sam Brownback, Kan., and Rick Santorum, Penn.

    At one of those meetings, Brownback stopped short of telling his testimony to ask Clinton’s forgiveness for the sins of feeling hatred toward her and saying derogatory things about her, according to The Atlantic.

    “I came here today prepared to share about this experience in my life that has caused great suffering, the result of which has deepened my faith. But I’m overcome now with only one thought,” Brownback said upon seeing Clinton in the meeting.

    After asking for her forgiveness, Clinton said she appreciated the apology and forgave him.

    Ever since then, Clinton found it easier to work with both sides of the political divide, and even co-sponsored a bill with Brownback. She has worked with conservatives and liberals alike, showing that she is able to use her faith in the political realm to foster good for her causes and agenda.

    I’ll admit I could be wrong about this: she might have been faking it just as the Orange Potus did – for political advantage.

    Michael Cohen’s book about his years as Donald Trump’s fixer is a clarion call to Christians to wake up; recognize the man many of them revere as a heavenly agent is a religious fraud; and act.

    Trump loathes Christians and mocks their faith, but pretends to believe if it suits his purposes.

    In Disloyal, published today, Cohen shows how Trump is a master deceiver. He quotes Trump calling Christianity and its religious practices “bullshit,” then soon after masterfully posing as a fervent believer. In truth, Cohen writes, Trump’s religion is unbridled lust for money and power at any cost to others.

    https://www.christianpost.com/news/6-interesting-facts-about-hillary-clintons-christian-faith.html

    https://news.yahoo.com/really-thinks-trump-mocks-christians-100354053.html

    • Replies: @Emslander
  53. @Legba

    Does it then follow that the proles need to rise up and kill the rich? I’m OK with that, by the way

    Probably a bad idea, for if the rich/poor encounter comes to violence, the super-rich are in a much better position to wipe out poor people. Because so many of them are psychopaths, they’d start their genocide in a heartbeat.

    • Replies: @mocissepvis
  54. Mefobills says:
    @Dumbo

    I never understood what’s the relevancy of Twitter anyway, so, I guess for me nothing changes that much.

    The media was consolidated with CFR agent Bill Clinton’s telecommunication act of 1996.

    The media is a cross directorate of boards, where the owners dictate to their presstitute employee mouthpieces what to say.

    And yes, of course the cross directorate owners are Jewish for the most part, as our (((friends))) have always gravitated toward narrative control, whatever host society they reside in.

    Presstitutes get their feed from Reuters or another (((owned))) operation, and pretty soon the landscape is filled with singing of presstitute songs.

    Most presstitutes no longer do investigative, or on the ground reporting. They watch twitter and then, if it fits the narrative, they blast it into their echo chamber.

    The entire Reuters to Owned Media echo chamber will have trouble echoing with Twitter not following the masters of the universe dictates.

    Elon is not going along with our ((friends)) on narrative control. He has already said that he has a pathological attachment to the idea of free speech. He also could care less about making money on twitter. Elon is a Stoic, not a (((philargurian.)))

    https://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2021/04/michael-hudson-plato-aristophanes-and-aristotle-on-money-lust-399-380-bc.html

    Elon is NOT driven by money lust. He is not a creditor sociopath with money lust.

    Who occupies positions in civilizational hierarch matters a lot. The wrong type of people, and you are screwed. The wrong types are kvetching about Musk’s acquisition of Twitter.

    Delphi’s warning that lust for monetary silver (philarguria) was the only thing that could destroy Sparta was echoed by Plato, Socrates and other philosophers accusing wealth addiction of leading to greedy and hubristic behavior that impoverished society at large. Creditors were singled out for reducing debtors to bondage and taking their land.

    Grimes says that Musk sometimes lives below the poverty line. Musk doesn’t signal his wealth, he is not at all like our (((friends))). The wealth that he accrues is for creating a civilization on Mars.

    In contrast to 20th-century price theory assuming diminishing enjoyment or “marginal utility” for each additional unit of a specific consumer good, Greek philosophy saw monetary wealth as being insatiable, becoming more addictive and compulsive. In Aristophanes’ last play, Ploutos(written in 388), the character Karion observes that one may become over-satiated with food – bread, sweets, cakes, figs and barley – but no one ever has enough wealth.

    Musk usually attacks Oligarchs (e.g. Bill Gates), and does not self aggrandize against normies.

    Aristotle contrasted the pleasure of hubristic acts with the social instinct for reciprocity. It is “that of making others feel one’s superiority by hurting or insulting them, and it is more likely to occur among those blessed by the gods of fortune (while lacking moral virtue), or those sure that they will be safe from unpleasant consequences; the rich and the young were specifically mentioned in the definition as typically hybristai, and the connection with the idea of koros or too much good fortune is not far away.”[6]Such hubris thus was a problem that plagued the rich.

    Musk is actually a Stoic, and does not fit into the Oligarch hubris money sick category. He just happens to be a Stoic that became wealthy, and has admitted that his wealth is bonkers.

    Aristotle and subsequent Stoics advocated that rulers should prevent poverty by ensuring that citizens had enough land to be self-sustaining. This could not be achieved where citizens fell deeply into debt and land holdings were widely unequal. But that was the reality of classical Greek society, despite the principles of balance and moderation underlying most of its moral philosophy.

    Do you see Musk cruising around in a gold plated Yacht? He confesses his private jet is a luxury, but it saves him time, and helps him work longer hours.

    The Stoic ethic held that citizens should conduct themselves like well‑behaved guests at a group meal, with self‑restraint and a concern for the welfare of their companions. But rising prosperity undermined this traditional symbolic equality of portions. In On Drunkenness, Chamaeleon of Heracleia (c. 350-275 BC) wrote: “If those who enjoy power and wealth esteem this devotion to drunkenness above everything else, it is not to be wondered at” that they demand ever larger wine cups. “This is why the larger forms of drinking‑cups grew to be the fashion among the persons in power. But this … is a recent invention, imported from the barbarians.”[8]

    A Stoic is now in charge of Twitter, and the ruling sociopathic (((creditor class))) cannot control him.

    • Thanks: roonaldo
  55. Anonymous[146] • Disclaimer says:

    Lol @ all the POC bootyclapping for Elon, newsflash: now that it has been bought, it will become stormfront but x100.

    • Replies: @profnasty
  56. Bro43rd says:
    @bwuce wee

    I want to agree & LOL but can only select one so I’m saying, “Now that’s funny” (Larry the Cable Guy).
    And Elon Musk is an enigma of sorts. Gets rich off of taxpayer subsidies, but is still revered as a money wizard. He’s no Henry Ford for sure.
    And Tesla, welfare for the wealthy, that’s promoted as a green miracle but really does immense ecological damage mining battery components. It really is Bizarro World we live in now.

    • Agree: Realist, SBaker
  57. Emslander says:
    @Zachary Smith

    I’m having a hard time figuring out what it is you’re thinking I’m seeing at a wrong angle.

    I’m totally on for forgiveness, having been one of those who has been forgiven for much.

    I thought I implied that Trump was given a full measure of rope by the MSM in 2015 and 2016, believing that he would hang himself.

    I can also believe that Hilary would wear a nun’s habit for the final month of a presidential campaign, if her pollsters thought it would help. I’ve known some nuns who are more pro-abortion than Hilary. Hypocrisy and falsehood are nothing more than passing moods for the ambitious, especially ambitious women. Truth is only an emotion in politics. I was working in the US Senate when someone told me that “sincerity is very hard to fake”.

    My post was primarily an argument that current censorship is the dying tactic of a movement that is no longer rooted in reality.

  58. Al Liguori says: • Website

    He is the opposite of his every claim.



    Video Link

    • Thanks: Agent76, Commentator Mike
    • Troll: CelestiaQuesta
    • Replies: @Pierre de Craon
    , @SBaker
  59. I would imaging Bezos is scared schittless, one can imagine Twitter offering alternatives to Amazon, NetFlix originals or just plain old broadcast news and lifestyle content without the “Woke” angle or GlobalHomo and negro worshiping cRap.

    Who knows I may just open a Twitter account and tweet when they get rid of all the fakes and trolls.

  60. Alrenous says: • Website

    If ‘authenticate’ means ‘authenticate’ when Musk uses the word, it would mean that I would get like an anti-verified badge. “Probable bot.” I would of course wear this proudly. I would ask for two.

    Naturally if it means “ban everyone else” I will laugh hard enough to hurt myself. “Free speech” lol.

    When Musk first poked twitter I thought he was naively playing around and wasn’t willing to secure his shit and just buy the company. Proved me wrong, didn’t he? I’m going to learn something! I don’t even know what yet!

    At the very least, about securities law he isn’t as naive as he comes across. He’s said some seriously boneheaded things about climate and AI risk. Full normie tier nonsense. Is he naive about free speech?

    P.S. I’m actually against free speech. It’s subsidized speech, which is irresponsible speech. Encourages crazy speech. Worth, at most, what you pay for it. Imagine I had to pay to comment – then (on average) a comment might be worth reading.

    • Replies: @JimmyCrackCorn
  61. Agent76 says:

    Apr 12, 2022 Elon Buys Twitter: What Does it REALLY Mean?

    Elon Musk has taken a 9% stake in the public shares of Twitter. Yet he has just declined the board seat that was offered to him. What does this mean? Will he take over the whole company and save Twitter in the process?

    Jul 6, 2021 Elon Musk celebrates 100 years of Communism on Chinese social media

    Author and political commentator Gordon G. Chang joins Ezra Levant to discuss Tesla CEO Elon Musk’s decision to celebrate 100 years of Communism not just one Twitter, but on the Chinese social media app Weibo, where he changed his background to prominently feature an image honouring 100 years of the Communist Party of China.

    • Replies: @Freedomstillisntfree
  62. Agent76 says:
    @Priss Factor

    The truth from the founder of Planned Parentless.

    • Replies: @Anon
  63. @JWalters

    Good points …
    the SS´* very own newsletter Das Schwarze Korps was the least censored
    media of the time 😀
    Their logic was simple: If your point cannot stand without being backed by the
    Worldly Arm or a screeching zombie horde, it is weak; and if it is weak,
    it deserves to die.
    The Founders they weren´t (heh), but the Method is universal.
    The Bolshewiks (at least under Lenin) had rather lively discussions but if it left
    the Inner Party it was cast in bronze; Stalin narrowed the inner circle to the point
    that Mao felt the need to backpedal (“A dogma is worth less than manure –
    with manure you can at least fertilize”).

    I wouldn´t invest too much hope in (((Musk))) but it´s hard to see how he
    could be worse – he might just be wacky enough
    (Disclaimer: This refusenik never felt the need for social media but I recognize
    it´s a constituent part of reality these days).

    *Despite tracing themselves to the Leibstandarte (Hitler´s bodyguard) they
    were at core what we would call a think tank.

  64. I’m late to the thread, but would like to put in a few words unrelated to the article content but to writer Jack Dalton:

    First, thanks again, Ron Unz, for featuring the good writers of VDare on your site, even when you disagree on the points made. (I side with VDare, for your information.)

    Next, I’ve followed VDare for almost 2 decades now and have probably read 90-95% of all the writing on it. At this point, my favorite new writer on there is this Jack Dalton here. Mr. Dalton, you have been mentioned with praise on Peak Stupidity multiple times.

    I appreciate your use of the word Communists* to describe the may-as-well-have-been-reincarnated leftists of today’s America. I appreciate the disdain for the whole Kung Flu** PanicFest. I hope you will keep writing regularly. Thanks.

    .

    * See “Our favorite VDare writer Jack Dalton on the American Commies”.

    ** I see you and Allan Wall like “Flu Manchu”, which is even better!

  65. Johan says:
    @Swaytonious

    In practice, the US has since long been a democracy, culturally I mean, mass culture, mob culture, and a country with oligarchic tendencies.

  66. There is only one test of free speech, Can I criticize Jews???

    • Replies: @Realist
    , @Pat Kittle
  67. @Alrenous

    I would not mind paying to “post” a comment if the rank of my comment would pay me as well…

  68. Cking says:

    Hot off the press; the UK PM Boris Johnson and EU officialdom have now publicly warned Musk to manage his content with moderation.

    • Replies: @eternal anglophile
  69. Musk reeks of some bizarre, cutting-edge AI/cyborg experiment of the CIA. It’s super-unclear how he made his money and why his consistently unprofitable companies were valued so highly for so long. I’m skeptical that he’s suddenly going to transform Twitter into a bastion of old-west-internet-style free speech, but there’s a lot to be said for entropy and chaos theory. Even if he is somehow a CIA front or something conspiratorial like that, Musk throws the cat amongst the pigeons for sure. Anybody who can send the neo-Marxist media into such conniptions with a one short highly-ambiguous Tweet (like “Who controls the media? Hello?”) is probably a net positive.

    (And, no, as much as I believe in a powerful Zionist elite and a destructive neo-aristocracy for whom ideology is more important than money, I don’t believe that our enemies are so highly orgaanised and single-minded as to be putting on a pantomime wherein Musk says something and then the media collectively trots out a scripted response, all for some unfathomable ulterior reason. Musk being a loose cannon seems to be some weird glitch in the Matrix.)

    • Replies: @Angharad
  70. @Cking

    The Online Harms Act (or whatever we ended up calling it) is going to force platforms like Twitter to rigorously monitor content anyway. It’s also going to strip away our right to anonymity/pseudonymity by forcing the use of real-world ID’d full names everywhere. It puts us on a par with China’s online restriction of freedoms, except nobody seems to care for some reason.

  71. unless Musk plans to fire all the Jews,communists, Zionists, faggots, femenoids, and other woke A-holes who infest the censurious Twitter bureaucracy,

    nothing much will change. And

    I see no evidence he will do so. For starters, let’s see if he fires the current .indian Pajeet CEO.

    on the contrary, anyone tweeting about, say, the environmental rapine inflicted during the production of one lithium battery (about 15 acres of strip-mine) will now be silenced quickly.

    • Agree: Al Liguori
    • Replies: @Liza
  72. Liza says:
    @Haxo Angmark

    …anyone tweeting about, say, the environmental rapine inflicted during the production of one lithium battery (about 15 acres of strip-mine) will now be silenced quickly.

    I suspect you’re right about this.

  73. Dont hold your breath waiting for the new and improved free speech twitter. Even if Musk fires the patel and takes over as CEO he will have a hard time making any real changes.

    Musk wanting to return free speech to twitter is a nice strategy. But as Peter Drucker said “culture eats strategy for breakfast.” Musk will have to first change the culture at twitter to have any chance of implementing his strategy. He will have as much luck doing that as Trump did draining the swamp. The entrenched bureaucracy always wins.

    When he reinstates Alex Jones’s and Trump’s twitter accounts we will know he accomplished the improbable if not impossible. Trump says he wont come back to twitter, but we all know the narcissistic assclown wont be able to help himself.

    • LOL: richebourg
    • Replies: @richebourg
  74. Gentricist Cognitoids or Cognoids full of crap



    Video Link

    • Agree: Skeptikal
  75. Patricus says:
    @Tucker

    Musk may have a name with Hebrew origins but don’t most western people have names derived from the Bible? Joseph, Michael, Sarah, Deborah and thousands more. Maybe the parents liked the sound of the name.

  76. If–and I did say “if”–Musk allows one to make noises like “The Holocaust is bullshit,” “Israel is a criminal, racist Zionist entity,” “Washington, Di\$trict of Corruption is bought-and-paid-for,” I’ll believe it.

    We’ll see if Musk really believes in free speech. . . .

    • Replies: @Stones
  77. GenFranco says:
    @ARepli

    Someone who has access to your computer has posted something here that is completely idiotic. And they did it in your name.

    Find them and punish them severely.

    • Agree: Achmed E. Newman
  78. Musk Takes Twitter. Is Left Right to be Terrified?

    The other important question that should be asked in the title is “Is the Right Wrong to be Optimistic?”

    Musk’s life trajectory strongly suggests that he is the next generation’s Bill Gates (both came by their wealth by, shall we say, less than transparent means and both are ardent transhumanists), with all that this implies.

    Be wary. Be very, VERY wary.

    • Agree: Liza
  79. @Karl1906

    I really wish there was a “Well, DUH!” option in the “Agree/Disagree/Etc.” button.

  80. @Sam Hildebrand

    You last sentence got a nice laugh from me. And you’re so right.

  81. Makes you wonder about a system that promotes people like this. Jews control the media, and fish rots from the head.

  82. KenH says:

    Let’s not forget that it took a white guy committed to free speech principles to pull this off. And let’s not forget that it’s mostly Jewish elites and their minions who are freaking out and shrieking over Elon Musk buying Twitter.

    It’s whites who are the most committed to free speech. Not Jews, blacks, Latinos or Asians. Those groups only support speech if it doesn’t offend them.

    As far as Musk restoring true free speech on the platform I will believe it when I see it. I think it will definitely be an improvement over the Soviet style censorship that prevails today but if he bows to pressure and censors and/or bans pro-whites and critics of Jews then he’ll be the same as the old bosses.

    • Replies: @mocissepvis
  83. Jews have corrupted our society beyond belief. Jews say, goyim obey. In some ways, we can’t blame Jews because goyim are DUMB. It’s like goyim cannot think for their own and must always parrot the dogma pushed by Jews.

    • Replies: @mocissepvis
  84. @Rev. Spooner

    Hope brings eternity!
    (Irish saying)

    • Replies: @Skeptikal
  85. ko says:

    What’s really gonna blow minds is when Musk offers a Twitter payment solution, separate from legacy twitter, but possibly one to rival Amazon in some way, and PayPal.

    • Replies: @Stones
  86. Stones says:
    @Jim Bob Lassiter

    @Emslander

    “Freedom of speech and expression was a Left-Wing value until Donald Trump was elected.”

    I’m afraid that you are wrong on timeline positioning of the Left’s abandonment of freedom speech and expression. Sam Francis speaks of it approximately 25 years prior to Trump’s election.
    ——-
    Agreed. The left if they ever had free speech as a part of there ideology abandoned it in the distant past. It was never more than a slogan for them.

    The loud mouth Berkley “free speech” leftist mobs of the ’60’s era only permitted their own speech. Imminent scientists like William B. Shockley were harassed, physically attacked and shouted down for divulging research on race. The left has protected their egalitarian nonsense through a spectrum of activities from hounding to violence to outright murder of those of a different view.

    That free speech was ever a left-wing value is false. Maybe that is the difference between leftists and liberals.

    • Replies: @acementhead
  87. Realist says:
    @Dieter Kief

    I’m so glad Elon Musk – did it!

    Free speech is the essence of the West.

    How do you know Musk will promote free speech? You’re counting the chickens before they hatch.

    If as reported the new Twitter will not allow anonymity…the value of Twitter will be even more diminished. I have never used Twitter, but the absence of anonymity would make sure I never would. Not because I fear reprisal through employment, I am retired, or physical threat…but through harassment from phone calls and email spamming.

  88. @Zachary Smith

    It’s important to remember that the über-rich and powerful rely on the lower classes for their “muscle and protection.” If they overstep too far and start alienating too many of us, they’ll leave themselves wide open to getting what’s coming to them.

  89. Realist says:
    @Johnny Smoggins

    Just as Bitcoin has no value if it can be controlled by government, Twitter has no value if one can’t post using a pseudonym.

    What use is it to be able to speak one’s mind if some activist can dox you and harass your family or get you fired?

    Exactly. As I just posted a while ago anonymity is crucial…I am retired but have no desire for harassment.

  90. Musk Must Begin A Mass Firing Extinction Event At Twitter To Restore Free Speech

    Musk Must Fire All Current Twitter Employees And Claw Back All Pay And Benefits And Other Emoluments

    The JEW/WASP Ruling Class of the American Empire Must Be Politically Decapitated And They Must be Removed From Power

    God Bless The United States Of America

  91. Abbybwood says:
    @anonymous

    It will be six months before Musk can fire everyone at “Twitter” and bring in his own people.

    Six months is a long time, yet plenty of time for Musk to bring in his own people to change the algorithms etc.

    Just in time for the midterms.

    Timing, as they say, is everything.

  92. Realist says:
    @JimmyCrackCorn

    There is only one test of free speech, Can I criticize Jews???

    It is not the only test…but an important one. The only test for free speech is can I say anything I want?

    If there are limits on free speech…it is not free. The more the limits, the less the freedom.

    • Agree: acementhead
  93. @Priss Factor

    Jews have corrupted our society beyond belief. Jews say, goyim obey. In some ways, we can’t blame Jews because goyim are DUMB. It’s like goyim cannot think for their own and must always parrot the dogma pushed by Jews.

    Too many Goyim over the last couple of hundred years have been deceived by the “judeo-christianity” that was pumped first into their churches by Jew-controlled fake Christian theologians, then into the wider society by Jew-owned “commercialists” and politicians. “Judeo-Christianity” is the false, satanic religion that teaches that the same “chosen” people who disobeyed their Heavenly Father too many times to count (and suffered repeatedly for it, like the retarded child that keeps sticking his finger into a live electrical socket over and over again) and who put His Only Son, Their Savior, to death are still the “chosen people” despite their perfidity and betrayal. Because most Goyim are too lazy (and stupid) to read and absorb the New Testament of the Holy Bible, they readily gobbled up the verbal and literary vomitus of frauds like Charles Finney, Cyrus Scofield (who apparently was massively in debt to a couple of (((tribesmen))), and others who mocked and marginalized Christ in favor of the people who murdered him.

    American Goydom never recovered from this stealth transformation and the destruction that it has wrought. Up until approximately two centuries ago, anyone familiar with Christian theology (indeed, even those who weren’t) took it for granted that the Jews are Christendom’s mortal enemies, for they harbor a hatred for Christ stronger than that of any pagan. Today, it is salvagable pagans who are mocked and despised (in violation of the spirit and letter of the Great Commission) while the ones who murdered and blaspheme the names of the Son and Holy Spirit and who regard anyone who worships the Son of God as a demon are pedestalized.

    Given the sorry state of affairs and the complete inversion of the Christian Faith to extol as blameless and perfect God’s apostate “chosen” people/His Son’s murderers, it is no wonder at all the God is unleashing well-deserved judgment on the American nation that allows His Son’s murderers to reign supreme.

    • Replies: @Priss Factor
  94. @KenH

    It’s whites who are the most committed to free speech. Not Jews, blacks, Latinos or Asians. Those groups only support speech if it doesn’t offend them.

    That’s why I’m now in favor of shutting all these people the fsck up. If they’re unwilling to allow free speech for others, they damned well don’t deserve it for themselves.

  95. Never went there but now I might. So….what horrible things should I say to test Mr Musk’s claims? On second thought, I don’t really have anything I’d like to say to the world. I just have opinions and it gives me great pleasure if they happen to be different from what is popular. It’s possible that the whole world is wrong, right?

    Anyway, I grew up under apartheid censorship, and I hate the very idea that someone else wants to tell me what I’m allowed to know or think or say. The only situation I try to watch what I say is in front of children. There’s no kids on social media, I sincerely hope.

    Time will tell if Musk is serious. Pro and contra censorship parties will also likely misbehave to try and force his hand or test his limits.

    • Replies: @TheMoon
    , @Pierre de Craon
  96. Stones says:
    @ko

    What’s really gonna blow minds is when Musk offers a Twitter payment solution, separate from legacy twitter, but possibly one to rival Amazon in some way, and PayPal.

    Bulls eye.

    There are billionaires and there are BILLIONAIRES.

    Retired billionaire Ted turner owns and manages over 100,000 acres of land and other holdings.
    Think of this: Alon Musk is two order of magnitude more wealthy than Ted. That alone makes a TwitterPay possible and would remove the feared money sword from the Jew’s hand.

  97. Elon Musk is for Elon Musk and could care less about our free speech. People need to take the time to really look into this clown. Currently it’s like an Elon Musk worship fest from FOX and others. Disgusting.

  98. Musk wrote “authenticate real humans”, not “de-anonymize real humans.”

    He’s not stupit.

  99. TheMoon says:

    Removing anonymity is fine when you can afford a private security force.

    The rest of us might get a psycho coming after us for posting a recipe they think was unsafe for the climate.

  100. TheMoon says:
    @James of Africa

    The acid test will always be anything about Jews.

    • Thanks: Angharad
    • Replies: @James of Africa
  101. bert33 says:

    If the only way you can ‘win’ a debate is by cutting off responses from the opposition then you lost a long time ago. The democrats are going to get a rude awakening in november and starting with fauci there’s going to be prosecutions and a good thorough housecleaning and good riddance to the ‘democratic’ party that has become anything but.

  102. I hope I am wrong but Musk is going to lose this one. Regular people do not use Twitter. Twitter is used to showcase the famous/influential by the MSM. The oligarchs control the celebrities and the MSM. They will simply direct the celebs to use a different platform and direct the media to showcase the new platform and ignore Twitter. Its amazing to me that Musk did not figure out what they will do. Twitter is going to become a circle jerk like this site.

    Tell me how I could be wrong?

  103. Stones says:
    @Orville H. Larson

    If–and I did say “if”–Musk allows one to make noises like “The Holocaust is bullshit,” “Israel is a criminal, racist Zionist entity,” “Washington, Di\$trict of Corruption is bought-and-paid-for,” I’ll believe it.

    Good metric.

    Might take a little time. Don’t want to scare the horses.

  104. @Stones

    ” Imminent scientists like William B Shockley…”

    W. B. S. was hardly an “imminent” scientist in the ’60s, as he’d already recieved the Nobel in 1956.

    • Replies: @Anon
    , @stones
  105. Anon[452] • Disclaimer says:
    @Zachary Smith

    So who do you say should buy Twitter and “everything in sight”? Poor people? Where will poor people get the money to buy everything in sight? And if poor people do get the money to buy everything in sight, wouldn’t that make them Super Rich people, buying everything in sight?

    Poor people create very little and have very little. This is why they *don’t* run Twitter and everything in sight.

  106. Anon[452] • Disclaimer says:
    @acementhead

    It’s spelled “received,” Mr. Smarty.

    • Replies: @Liza
  107. @TheMoon

    Shhh! Don’t let Elon hear that kind of talk! I’ll wait and see, he is of the tribe after all. I like free speech because I have opinions about everything, but I’m not expecting miracles about this. I’m hoping he has a thick skin and that he’s heard it all by now, for the sake of others at least. I doubt that I’ll end up tweeting after ignoring twitter since always.

  108. Anon[922] • Disclaimer says:
    @Agent76

    I don’t think that meme is effective in getting people to hate PP.

    • LOL: Angharad
  109. Twitter is a loss-guaranteed business; and finally now a few questions are asked who is subsidizing its loses. How long can Musk sustain these losses? And how long can he resist the Woke Army?

    We are seeing a final step in converting the late republic into a feudal order; after Musk, banksters will reel out enough “money” to buy all these tech giants into private fiefdoms. This is the private fencing of commons, openly and in your face. Don’t get me wrong; Musk may prove to be more tolerant of dissent, but overall, oligarchs as a class are not going to be tolerant of public opinion.

  110. @Al Liguori

    I join the others who thank you for the information, all of which was news to me. I seldom click on video links—90 percent of them waste time on sensationalism—but I’m glad I made an exception for this one.

    Addendum: Al’s site is a recommendable resource for those interested in Jewish crime and perfidy down through the centuries. It will be of especial but by no means exclusive interest to Catholics and other Christians. Trolls and Sailerites will find it offensive.

    • Replies: @Al Liguori
  111. Angharad says:
    @eternal anglophile

    Musk is a genetic jew. His mother is an actual Israeli jew. Double indemnity in the genetics realm. Hence the natural reaction to jewish weirdness.

    • Replies: @raga10
  112. profnasty says:
    @Anonymous

    “Oh wouldn’t it be nice.” Brian Wilson

    Don’t worry, your kind will most likely win.
    Here’s 102 pages of your closest friends. Compliments of Klaus Schwab.
    https://www.younggloballeaders.org/community
    “Oh the horror.” Marlon Brawndo

  113. Liza says:
    @Anon

    I think it was on purpose.

  114. Screw that “our guy/not our guy” BS.

    The dwarves are for the dwarves.

    We live in a world where our only acceptable advocates are billionaires and black people. Everybody else is silenced by default.

    Given the fact that even “our guys” regularly betray our best interests, there is nobody you can count on except the ‘our guy’ you see in the mirror. And he’s nowhere near as smart as you like to think.

  115. stones says:
    @acementhead

    Looks like we both wash blackboards after school, acemethead. As anon pointed out, its not “recieved”. But thx for pointing out the flub.
    Yes, eminent. William B. Shockley was that. Same treatment for a host of other eminent scientists who would not follow the leftist party line.

    If we get the upper hand eventually, considering the soulless leftists that have behaved this way for decades, we should take no prisoners.

  116. @James of Africa

    … it gives me great pleasure if [my opinions] happen to be different from what is popular. It’s possible that the whole world is wrong, right?

    It’s more than possible. It’s a winning bet at least five times out of eight.

    • Thanks: James of Africa
  117. Musk buying Twitter is extremely funny. But its not a big big deal unless you are a victim of the woke mind virus.

  118. raga10 says:
    @Angharad

    His mother is an actual Israeli jew.

    I call bullshit on this one – his mother was born in Canada. Her maiden name is Haldeman which does sound Jewish, but she is not “an actual Israeli jew”.

    • Replies: @Angharad
  119. @mocissepvis

    What’s with these goyim?

    When Jews used to say free speech is sacrosanct and that Joe McCarthy was the worst, most goy liberals nodded and parroted the Jewish line.

    Now, Jews say free speech is bad and we need controlled speech and use blacklisting to destroy people, and most goy ‘liberals'(now illibs) just nod along and parrot the same lines.

    Can these goyim think on their own without Jews telling what to think and say?

  120. @Ukraine Tiger

    The LNP regime is preferred, because there is a rump of ‘Leftists’ left in the ALP. In our last election, the LNP regime lost EVERY opinion poll for three years, from all pollsters, using different techniques. They changed leaders in a blood-bath of treachery. Numerous members resigned rather than be defeated. Then they lost EVERY opinion poll during the election campaign. Then they lost the exit polls, so we are to believe that voters lied as they left the polling booths. But then they ‘won’ the actual election. Ask an actuary about those odds, and it was all ignored by the MSM vermin.

    • Replies: @Ed Case
  121. Ed Case says:
    @Ukraine Tiger

    Why would they bother to rig Australian elections. Both major parties identical ideologies.
    Not so.
    One party is a criminal organisation far sleazier than the Democratic Party, the other is the Liberal Party, who have governed responsibly for the last 8 years.
    Every chance that the Election will be rigged in favor of the Sleaze Party.

    • Replies: @mulga mumblebrain
  122. Malla says:

    This just in, a message from Agarwal, he has poured his heart out.

    • Replies: @Achmed E. Newman
  123. Ed Case says:
    @mulga mumblebrain

    Then they lost the exit polls, so we are to believe that voters lied as they left the polling booths.

    Straight up lie, the exit polling wasn’t revealed.

    • Replies: @mulga mumblebrain
  124. Jim James says:
    @RJ Macready

    The Gentiles will never be “allowed” to have their own planet for the same reasons they are not allowed to have their own country:

    1. Jews are terrified that an autonomous Gentile society will seek retribution
    2. An outstanding example of why Gentiles should desire their own society is a threat to the narrative
    3. Without Whites to build things and raise food, lawyers/teachers/bankers/politicians/pornographers/actors do not have a society to feed upon

    Exalt no man. Its modern society and they-who-must-not-be-named that has taught you to worship celebrities as saviours instead of being the change you want to see.

    Musk is a trans-humanist.

    • Replies: @NarrowPath777
  125. KenH says:

    The real question is when will the ADL’s police force, otherwise known as the FBI, raid Tesla or Musk’s private home in a bid to intimidate him to being the government’s censor?

    The FBI’s primary function now is serving as a praetorian guard for Jewish elites and other members of the ruling class.

  126. Musk already reverses himself on his “free speech” promises, ‘clarifying’ that he will enforce restrictions on speech that are enacted by governments as laws, as these governments are reflecting the ‘will of the people’ when such laws are enacted.

    Yes, he actually said it: https://www.rt.com/news/554577-musk-backtracks-free-speech-twitter/

    And anybody is surprised? In my opinion, he is 100% totally controlled opposition by the elites who placed him exactly where he is today because he WILL do their bidding while hoodwinking the masses, because he’s the richest man in the world, you know, so he must be better than everybody else, right? Remember: Elon is on your side. No doubt about it, Saint Elon loves you. Like Jesus. Trust Elon.

    (Or maybe he’s just like Zelinsky in Ukraine, a VERY well-paid traitor who will, when the time comes, sell out everyone who placed any trust in him and his words, and all for incredible wealth and power: https://sputniknews.com/20220426/wheres-the-money-zelensky-dutch-party-asks-ukraines-prez-to-account-for-850-mln-personal-wealth-1095067872.html)

    • Thanks: Angharad
  127. Angharad says:
    @raga10

    You believe what jews tell you, then?

    • Replies: @raga10
  128. hi folks says:
    @hi folks

    In 2017, the #DeleteShopify hashtag campaign called for a boycott of Shopify for allowing Breitbart News to host a shop on its platform. Shopify’s CEO, Tobias Lütke, responded to the criticism, saying “refusing to do business with the site would constitute a violation of free speech”. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shopify#Criticism

    But still.

  129. @Agent76

    Obvious pandering to keep the chinese market open.

  130. raga10 says:
    @Angharad

    You believe what jews tell you, then?

    I don’t believe that you know better.

  131. Males on the Right tend to think that Musk is some kind of fictional Tony Stark character, but life in reality is not a comic book.

    Caution when placing faith in any billionaire is warranted.

  132. @Jim James

    You are right, but I’d also add that us White Nations are actually NOT gentiles at all but the true descendants of Jacob Israel of the Bible. In the late BC/early AD period 10 out of 12 tribes migrated North and East, ending in Western Europe (especially the British Isles and Ireland). Modern day “jews” are the edomites that JESUS called “children of their father the devil”. If you research the real translation of the words rendered “jew” and “gentile” in some English Bibles, the truth becomes clear that the “jews” of today have fraudulently tried to steal the identity of White Peoples as the chosen race of YAHWEH. THAT is exactly why they hate us- they know they will never inherit the blessing that CHRIST gave to our people.
    .

  133. anonymous[372] • Disclaimer says:
    @RJ Macready

    All whitevils shipped off to Mars. That sounds good to me.

    How can the rest of us help?

    • Troll: Pat Kittle
  134. @Malla

    Is that real, Malla?

    • Replies: @Malla
  135. @Ed Case

    One of ScoMo’s dags (dried faeces caught on sheep’s backside). They lie like their Master, ie they do little else.

  136. @Ed Case

    One of the primary features of the Rightwing Authoritarian Personality, the very nadir of human excrescence, is their compulsion to lie. Here it is exemplified by the Lord of the Lies, Scott Morrison, and his fly-like minions, little faecal metastases of the Great Lieder. ‘Responsibly’ here means means most class-hate driven in their sadism and most corrupt in all things. Incompetence comes later.

    • Replies: @Malla
    , @Ed Case
  137. @JimmyCrackCorn

    There is only one test of free speech, Can I criticize Jews???

    It bears repeating:

    To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you cannot criticize.

    • Agree: Pierre de Craon
    • Replies: @Jakee308
  138. hillaire says:

    Scrollng through the shiterati’s tweets one can see the deformed inversion of evident truth so essential to the liberal mind… and the toxic and hypocritical ‘regime’ they serve…

    One can also read clearly from those ‘chosen’ to scribble…the palpable fear of losing a platform dedicated to jewish sophistry and anti-white animus..

    such vermin can only stand unchallenged… so fall they will… no doubt whining that private business has no ‘right’ to a policy of open and free discourse and Big Mommy government must do something …as hypocrites are wont to do and as the ruling class in Europe has intimated…

    whilst flatulently soiling itself at thought of plebeian critique….

  139. Malla says:
    @Achmed E. Newman

    Nah, a joke.But I think this is what is going on in his mind.

  140. Malla says:
    @mulga mumblebrain

    One of the primary features of the Rightwing Authoritarian Personality, the very nadir of human excrescence, is their compulsion to lie.

    LOL yet, Commies are some of the best liars and propaganda artists. Marxists are right winged then. never knew that.

    • Replies: @JohnnyWalker123
  141. Ed Case says:
    @mulga mumblebrain

    Faeces appear to be front of mind for you lately, Mulga.
    Are you on one of those new Fad Diets?

    • LOL: SBaker
    • Replies: @SBaker
  142. SBaker says:
    @Al Liguori

    Somewhere lies the truth. This is the first I have heard of the guy in the video.

  143. SBaker says:
    @Ed Case

    M&M is a staunch defender of coprophilic males.

  144. Jakee308 says:

    As to anonymous names for the actual tweets; perhaps it’s time we stop hiding. Yes the left will use that info to attack but they too will be exposed and also it may provide the defense to stop a company from firing someone or allow the target to discuss with those in the middle why what they’ve said is not worthy of them being destroyed.
    We know that the left has been able to turn anything they claim objectionable into “Hate”. But if it were widely known the exact words and context would they be able to force that opinion into a fact?

    Perhaps anonymity has been a secret poison we thought was protecting us and for short term it is.

    Just a thought to kick around. There are examples of other places that demand real names that don’t seem to invite as much destruction.

  145. Jakee308 says:
    @Pat Kittle

    I believe it would depend on how you criticize it.

    Antisemitic behavior was the modern beginning of political correctness. Before the “N” word there was the “J” word. Tho its now become more acceptable to say Jew. Once again depending on the context.

    I’ve been quite fascinated on how stating facts about the state of Israel may or may not be declared antisemitic or Jew Hate. Depending on what was said and who said it and who read/heard it.

    It’s a very humorous thing to watch people get red faced ugly over some words that they don’t like to hear.

    And they had the power and reach to make people pay for uttering statements that were considered antisemitic. Whether they really were or not.

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
$
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Jack Dalton Comments via RSS
PastClassics
The Shaping Event of Our Modern World
Becker update V1.3.2