The Unz Review: An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 Lance Welton Archive
Mixed-Race People: Taller, More Intelligent, Better Looking? —But Also Crazy
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information


Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

The Main Stream Media is quite clear about it: Mixed-race people are more intelligent and taller than are either of their parents [People born to genetically-diverse parents likely to be taller and more intelligent, says study, By Steve Connor, The Independent, July 1, 2015]. And they are also, in general, physically more attractive than mono-racial people [It’s a wonderful, mixed-up world, By Philip Hollis, The Daily Telegraph, November 1, 2009]. A total exaggeration, of course —but it is true that mixed-race people tend to be more crazy.

Needless to say, the mixed-race reality is more nuanced than the MSM reports. Edinburgh University’s Dr Peter Joshi and his team, analysed health and genetic information in 100 studies conducted worldwide, including details on more than 350,000 people, living in both urban and rural areas. They did find that “genetic diversity” (their term for “mixed-race”) is associated with higher IQ, being taller, and having higher levels of education; likely due to being more intelligent. [Directional dominance on stature and cognition in diverse human populations, By P.K. Joshi et al., Nature, July 2015]

But this is subtly different from the MSM reports. On massive samples, mixed-race people are more likely to have these qualities, but it is certainly doesn’t mean that a mixed-race child will always be taller, smarter, and cleverer than either of its parents. In many cases, it’ll slightly better than intermediate between its parents. This will mean that where, for example, a white father has an IQ of 100 and the black mother has an IQ of 96 then the child may well have a higher IQ than either of them. Nevertheless, in general, if a white person (average IQ: 100) has a child with a random black American person (average IQ: 85), that child will be less intelligent than the white parent.

There is certainly a phenomenon known as “hybrid vigor.” It fascinated Darwin, who observed, in Origin of Species that if you mix two strains you often end up with a hardier strain, saying that these crosses give “vigour and fertility to the offspring.” [Hybridism, Origin of Species,Ch. 8,]. Reason: the higher the level of genetic diversity, the less likely it is that a child will inherit two copies of a (almost always damaging) mutant allele. This, in turn, means that the child will likely have an optimally functioning nervous system, which will allow the child to more easily fight off diseases—whereas those with weaker immune systems would spend disproportionately more of their energy doing so, directing resources away from growth. So mixed-race people end up being taller.

Similarly, fewer of mixed-race people’s resources are directed away from the growth of the brain and there are fewer mutations which might slow down their nervous system. So, mixed-race people will be more intelligent than either of their parents, assuming their parents’ intelligence is roughly equal. Specifically, they are able to solve cognitive problems more quickly, speed being a crucial part of IQ tests.

For the same reasons, mixed-race people tend to be better-looking, based on the evaluation of faces [Why are mixed-race people perceived as more attractive?, By Michael B. Lewis, Perception, 2010] and assuming the parents’ faces are roughly equally attractive.

We are evolved to be acutely interested in faces because they are so complex, meaning that evidence of mutant genes (“mutational load”) is best discerned from the face.

Both sexes find the most symmetrical faces to be the most attractive. This is because we are evolved to be symmetrical, so the greater the deviation from symmetry, the higher the mutational load, and thus the poorer the genetic health. In addition, a symmetrical face means you’ve managed to maintain a symmetrical phenotype, despite battling against disease throughout your childhood. You therefore have an excellent immune system, and thus low mutational load, which will be reflected both in your face and your brain. This is likely part of the reason for the weak positive association between intelligence and physical attractiveness. [Intelligence and physical attractiveness, By Satoshi Kanazawa, Intelligence, 2011]

naomirightThe British-born model Naomi Campbell (right)is a stunning example of this process of hybrid vigour in action. Her parents were both Jamaican, with Jamaicans being about 10% white due to interbreeding on slave plantations. However, Campbell’s paternal grandmother was Chinese, Chinese labourers having been imported into Jamaica. She is, by any standard, extremely attractive; tall (5’ 10”); and intelligent, having studied ballet at the Italia Conti Academy of Theatre Arts in London. So, assuming her parents were reasonably tall, intelligent and good-looking, their low mutational-load daughter probably exceeds them in all these traits.

But Campbell is also nuts. She is prone to violent outbursts of extreme temper, with four convictions for assault. [Naomi Campbell: ‘People try to use your past to blackmail you. I won’t allow it’, by Hermione Hoby, Guardian, November 5, 2017] This is the flip-side even of equally intelligent and good-looking people from different races having children together—something the MSM conveniently don’t report.

Danish blogger and genetics researcher Emil Kirkegaard has brought together all the known studies on the relationship between being mixed-race and mental health. Kirkegaard points out the studies’ findings of elevated levels of suicide, hyper-sexuality, depression, and problem drinking among mixed-race people [Is miscegenation bad for your kids? By Emil Kirkegaard, Clear Language, Clear Mind, April 1, 2017]. He argues that genetic diversity is only good up to a point. Thereafter the alleles are not meant to go together. In extreme cases, you get sterile offspring, such as Ligers.

British anthropologist Edward Dutton has presented a parallel explanation in his book, J. Philippe Rushton: A Life History Perspective. With their mental instability, risk-taking and hyper-sexuality, mixed-race people are following a “faster Life History Strategy” than monoracial people.

A fast Life History Strategy happens when, due to an unstable ecology, you adapt to “live fast and die young” in order to pass on as many of your genes as you can as fast as you can.

A slow Life History Strategy develops when the ecology is harsh yet stable. As such, the group reaches the ecology’s carrying capacity and there is strong intragroup competition. You’re more likely to survive this the more strongly you are adapted to the environment. If your copious offspring are not adapted, then they may all die. So, energy is transferred away from promiscuous sex and towards investing in a small number of partners and offspring, so that they have the best chance of survival. This leads to the emergence of cooperative groups, with mental instability increasingly selected out.

Slow Life History Strategists tend to be attracted to those who are genetically similar to them, because they invest in their (small number of) offspring and so can increase the extent to which they pass on their genes by breeding with partners who are genetically similar—the most successful unions being between the genetic equivalent of third cousins [An association between the kinship and fertility of human couples, By A. Helgeson et al., Science, 2008]. This also means they tend to bond more with their offspring, encouraging further investment.

In an unstable ecology—where you live fast and die young—you will go for the best-looking people, but once you’ve done that, it pays to be attracted to genetic dissimilarity, because someone dissimilar may have some useful gene which will make the offspring more likely to survive. Hence the “black goes for blonde” phenomenon. In fact, there are high rates of divorce among mixed-race couples—although not when you control for indicators of Life History Strategy. [Marital Dissolution Among Interracial Couples, By Y. Zhang & J. Van Hook, Journal of Marriage and Family, February 2009].

Naomi Campbell herself was from a broken home. So was Barack Obama.

So, fast Life History strategists are more likely to contract mixed-race unions. These people are more likely to be mentally unstable and, so, mentally instability is passed on to their intelligent, attractive and tall children.

The smiling mixed-race couples who mysteriously now dominate so many TV commercials like the one below are hiding a dark secret.

They should be more realistically used to advertise mental health services than Cheerios .

Lance Welton [Email him] is the pen name of a freelance journalist living in New York.

(Republished from VDare by permission of author or representative)
• Category: Race/Ethnicity, Science • Tags: Mixed-Race 
Hide 105 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. Thomm says:

    This is a stupid article.

    All of Southeast Asia, Latin America, and Central Asia comprises of people who would be considered ‘mixed race’ under the narrow US-centric definition.

    If some idiot is going to claim all ‘mixed race under US definitions’ people are mentally unstable, you better be willing to say that the entire populations of Mexico, Brazil, Thailand, and Kazakhstan are mentally unstable.

  2. a white father has an IQ of 100 and the black mother has an IQ of 96 then the child may well have a higher IQ than either of them

    I’m thinking no.

    Why are mixed-race people perceived as more attractive?

    I’m thinking no.

    The British-born model Naomi Campbell (right)is a stunning example of this process of hybrid vigour in action

    I’m thinking no.

    • Agree: RadicalCenter
    • Replies: @MBlanc46
    , @angelikki
  3. Anonymous[402] • Disclaimer says:

    The smiling mixed-race couples who mysteriously now dominate so many TV commercials like the one below are hiding a (((dark secret))).

    So, in the history of mankind, in a world where moving past the next mountain range is actually hard to do, you would get mixing and adventurous crazies as populations interpenetrate, followed by periods of cool-off towards stability as the selection is for stay-at-home families and consolidation, until the next bunch of invaders arrive etc.

    This sounds like a good PhD project in computer simulation.

    • Replies: @Alfa158
  4. The Boston Globe reported some years ago that a mixed-race leukæmia patient had been told that the chances of finding a bone marrow donor were ‘zero’. He was three-quarters white and one-quarter Japanese. A donor ‘usually comes from a patient’s own ethnic group.’

    On the mental instability of Naomi Campbell, a paper published in 2008 looked at the high incidence of schizophrenia among black Caribbeans in Britain.

    • Replies: @Fidelios Automata
  5. Biff says:

    Mixed-Race People: Taller, More Intelligent, Better Looking? —But Also Crazy

    Well, that explains Americans. I was wondering where that extra amount of crazy came from?

    • Replies: @Saxon
  6. @Thomm

    I am from Brazil. Thanks for standing up for the mental stability of my fellow countrymen. Totally off topic: are you a reader of Leo Strauss?

  7. I have read (in a Steve Sailer blog post, I think) about genetics research pointing out that ashkenazi Jews could be considered a mix between Semites and Europeans. Do you agree? How does that fit your hypothesis?

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    , @Anonymous
    , @Truth
  8. Saxon says:

    All of those countries are inferior to previously monoracial higher IQ countries, with virtually all of them having higher incidences of crime, corruption, all sorts of social ills really and likely mental illness too but since they’re third world or close to it no one really has the resources or inclination to research it.

    • Replies: @Ben Sampson
  9. Saxon says:

    White Americans are very European by ancestry so unless this also applies intra-racially too by people mixing say one European group with another, then not really. Metrics like crime rates of actual white Americans aren’t really much different at all to the European source countries that most of them come from.

    The IQ of white Americans is ~102 or so. That is better than the general European average but the source locations are skewed, too. Around half of US white’s ancestry is sourced from Germany, for example, and similar countries like the British isles, Netherlands, France, Scandinavian countries etc. all make up most of the rest. So it’s hard to say these people having been slightly mixed together had a positive effect. It could just be the source locations being so heavily from some of the smartest places on the continent.

    • Replies: @Sara
  10. Anonymous[346] • Disclaimer says:
    @Brás Cubas

    They are not from Middle East extraction (see below). And Judaism isn’t continuous with the religion of Jews in the Old Testament. That became Christianity. Judaism is younger than Christianity and is based on the Talmud and denial of Christ.

    Surprise: Ashkenazi Jews Are Genetically European

    By Tia Ghose, Staff Writer
    LiveScience.comOctober 8, 2013

    The origin of the Ashkenazi Jews, who come most recently from Europe, has largely been shrouded in mystery. But a new study suggests that at least their maternal lineage may derive largely from Europe.

    Though the finding may seem intuitive, it contradicts the notion that European Jews mostly descend from people who left Israel and the Middle East around 2,000 years ago. Instead, a substantial proportion of the population originates from local Europeans who converted to Judaism, said study co-author Martin Richards, an archaeogeneticist at the University of Huddersfield in England…

  11. Rich says:

    Everyone knows that the White woman is the epitome of beauty, so naturally any Negress that has White features would be considered better looking than her fellows. But the idea that mixed race offspring are more intelligent than their parents seems like a stretch. Anyone who’s lived near a black neighborhood could testify that “high yellows” are usually angrier and lean toward criminality. Look at Obama who was said to have been involved in drug dealing while in college and easily could’ve ended up walking the tier in a state prison wearing high heels if he had been caught. The smartest black guy I ever met was a coal black African who’s father worked at the UN. Not only was this kid fairly intelligent, he was a pre-med student at a college out on Long Island, he hated American blacks considering them lazy and unintelligent.

  12. Anonymous [AKA "New Paradigm"] says: • Website

    On mixed-race people being more attractive, that Telegraph article is pretty weak evidence. It refers to one study claiming mixed-race people have more symmetrical faces than mono-racial people. Fine, but that’s making the assumption that symmetry alone is what makes an attractive face. Is a highly symmetrical Aborigine woman more attractive than a European woman with average facial symmetry? I doubt it.

    And not all races rank equally in attractiveness. If a woman is a mix of one group that ranks lower and one group that ranks higher, she will by default be “more attractive” than the average woman from the less attractive group.

    Regarding mental health, I think this is sparked by living their younger years in a perpetual identity crisis. You don’t see these problems when entire populations are hybrids, like Mestizos – it’s usually when people are from two mismatched backgrounds and they struggle to fit into either. This is a recurring theme in Obama’s biography, and anyone who has known a few mulattoes has seen this play out.

    • Replies: @Fidelios Automata
  13. anonymous[255] • Disclaimer says:

    There’s no need to speculate as mixed race populations have existed for a long time now. Just look at Latin America and there we have all sorts of combinations so theorize no more. “Hybrid vigor”? Hardly. The results are very unimpressive. The Spaniards who crossed the ocean in those days were a sturdy, bold group of conquerors the likes of which we’ll never see today and yet look at what we have there now.

  14. Most women are a little crazy, but I’m partial to the hyper-sexualized, attractive ones. I suppose that makes me part of the problem. What can I say in my defense? It’s not my fault, the devil made me do it!

    • Replies: @Father O'Hara
  15. MBlanc46 says:

    Don’t know about Thailand (other than that it’s a political basket case), but definitely Mexico, Brazil, and Kazakhstan.

  16. MBlanc46 says:

    You are thinking correctly. With regard to the third, not even a paper bag would suffice.

  17. @Thomm

    Russia, too. There are 22 national republics there that represent non-Russian ethnicities. However, there is so much internal migration and intermarriage that the population in all of them is very mixed.

  18. Sowhat says:

    First of all, the article is pure drivel.
    Has anyone beside me noticed how many “new” commercials there are on TV that show mixed race couples and every thing is honkey-dorey in their spacious, well appointed homes? LOL

    I haven’t seen this very often, prior to Trump’s installation as Commander and Chief.
    To be clear, I hold no ill will against others that are different skin color. There is an all-out effort to engineer social norms- no doubt about it. I’m probably less resistant to “change” than most people but, what will they want us to do, next? Accept pedophilia and sex with animals as “normal”?

    And then there’s Lester Holt, a Black Anchor on NBC Nightly News who had a short blip of social engineering on a few nights ago that could be described as a piece instigating racism. I’ve attempted to find it on YouTube so that I could provide a link to no avail.

    Just leave me alone to sort things out. I don’t need your “help.”

    • Replies: @Joe Stalin
    , @mark green
  19. Anon[121] • Disclaimer says: • Website

    What? So, mixed-raced people are the ubermensch?

    Then how come Mestizos of Mexico don’t rule the world?

    How come Central Asia and North Africa are not world powers?

  20. @Thomm

    Why don’t you learn to use the word ‘comprises’ correctly in a sentence before taking such an amateurish shot at a reasonable hypothesis.

    • Replies: @Thomm
  21. Re ethnic mixtures … Have always enjoyed being amongst Filipinas, who in their rich ethnic mixture are an exceptionally beautiful and enchanting people to my eyes. A bunch of Filipina women together can rather overwhelm me with the beauty palette. All sorts of Asian, European, Pacific Island etc influences.

    Here’s a fun video done at a college campus showing a good sampling of the range of intriguing Filipina faces, 8 leggy Pinay girls and a lucky Chad Pinoy guy, dancing to Toni Basil’s 1980s ‘Hey Mickey!’ hit in Spanish, in a film done as a class project. Delightful:

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    , @Anonymous
  22. This website just loves the “scientific” nonsense, don’t it.

    As long as it proves blacks inferior.

    • Replies: @ThreeCranes
  23. @Johnny Rottenborough

    A mixed-race friend of mine encountered just that problem. She did find a donor, thanks in no small part to the Internet.

    • Replies: @Johnny Rottenborough
  24. @Anonymous

    I personally find mixed-race women to be particularly attractive. In my case, I think it’s because they combine the exotic and the familiar. A purely African woman’s looks are a little too alien for my taste, but an optimal combination like Halley Berry — rowrrr! The same goes for East Asians, who tend to look like perpetual pre-teens to my Midwestern eye, but mixed with Caucasian voluptuousness can be stunningly beautiful.

    • Replies: @Stealth
  25. @Anonymous

    “They [Ashkenaz Jews] are not from Middle East extraction (see below).”

    If you bothered to read the article, which you cite, you would have seen that it is based on an analysis of mtDNA. The science is absolutely solid that Ashkenaz Jews are descendants of male Jews who migrated from the Levant to southern Europe.

    Studies of the entire Ashkenaz genome, some focusing on the Y chromosome, have demonstrated conclusively that Ashkenaz Jews are the descendants of male migrants to Europe from the Levant, who mated with European women, first in southern Europe. When the descendants of these inter-marrying Levantine Jews moved north of the Alps they suffered a severe genetic bottleneck before once again mating with local women. The non-maternal genome of Ashkenaz Jews shows definitely that they are descendants of Jewish migrants into Europe. There are even genetic markers in Ashkenaz Jews that allow one to distinguish with some degree of certainty, descendants of the Levites and the Cohens (priesthood).

    “Judaism is younger than Christianity and is based on the Talmud”

    Wrong (mostly) again. Rabbinic Judaism, the source of modern Ashkenaz religious practices, derives from Pharisaic Judaism. The evidence for this is overwhelming. And if you’ve read your New Testament and have any knowledge of Jewish sects at the time, you will be aware that Pharisaic Judaism predates Christianity, e.g., all those references by Jesus to “Scribes and Pharisees”, and Paul’s regular declarations that he is a Pharisee and a student of Gamaliel, who was a student of Hillel.

    In the first century AD, before the destruction of the Temple, Christians, Pharisees, Sadducees, Essenes, Zealots, and others were competing, Jewish-based sects. Jerusalem’s Christian community openly regarded itself as a Jewish sect, hence the conflicts between James and Paul in Acts of the Apostles.

    After the destruction of the Temple, Christianity and the Pharisees were the only two of these Jewish rooted sects remaining. They survived because both had already distanced themselves from Temple-centric worship. Both evolved after destruction of the Temple to deal with this loss in various ways. Christian-Jewish ways can be clearly discerned in the Gospel of Mark and to a lesser degree the Gospel of Matthew. Pharisaic Judaism evolved into Talmud-based Judaism and eventually Rabbinic Judaism. Both Rabbinic Judaism and Christianity continued evolving on separate paths from then on. But both evolved from a common source so one cannot say one religion predates the other.

    If you want to argue this point about the evolution of Christianity I suggest you consider, inter alia, the contrast between the creeds of earlier Church councils and the Nicean Creed, the Catholic/Orthodox dispute over philioque in this creed, the Monophysite heresy, the Great Schism, the Protestant Reformation, etc. And this isn’t even considering the obvious evidence of evolution the Christian churches took away from, beliefs and practices described in Acts of the Apostles and writings of the early Church Fathers.

    BTW, to forestall obvious ad hominem arguments, I’m a Roman Catholic with an interest in early Church history.

    • Replies: @Rich
    , @utu
    , @Mulegino1
  26. @Fidelios Automata

    Fidelios Automata—Good news indeed. There’s an example here of a patient seeking a donor. She’s a 29-year-old of Yemeni and Moroccan descent.

  27. Baltic Germans, Dutch and Scandinavians are among the tallest people on Earth.

    They are also among the more intelligent people on Earth.

    They are widely considered as attractive as anyone else on Earth.

    With whom are they supposed to cross breed so as to produce offspring that will rate higher in all three of those traits? How would that work?

  28. @obwandiyag

    Blacks are not “inferior”. They are more primitive. There’s a difference.

    Because blacks and whites are so far apart on the phylogenetic scale they are culturally and physically incompatible. In the interests of peace and harmony, individual wellbeing and cultural development, they should live apart. Communication between them should be limited to exchange of goods and services on the worldwide free market.

    Both are proud people who deserve a separate place under the Sun in which to flourish and prosper.

  29. Anonymous [AKA "scotirishviet"] says: • Website

    You’ve just confirmed what SJW victims on Reddit r/hapas have harassed me about for being half white/half Asian, specifically white father/Asian mother supposedly inferior, producing crazy offspring. I’m officially demonized by all sides now. Victim POC, white nationalists, and now Jewish paleo-conservatives. THANKS.

  30. Rich says:
    @Jus' Sayin'...

    The origin of the Ashkenazi is a delicate political issue and those who belong to the group will do anything within their power to prove a Middle Eastern connection. The evidence I’ve read shows they are actually a mixture of Southern Italian and Eastern European. They are a distinct group, but their connection to the Middle East can really only be traced to the 19th century when some European Jews moved to Palestine. If you have any real interest in this you can read about it in the work of geneticist Martin Richards of the University of Huddersfield.

  31. Alfa158 says:

    What’s mysterious about it? Seems quite obvious to most everybody except Lance.

  32. @Rich

    The article you suggested is in agreement with what I wrote. The article can be accessed here for confirmation of that assertion: .

    Popular accounts of the article fail to note that it focuses on mtDNA. Studies of Y-Chromosomes across Jewish populations show strong evidence that the founding males had a Jewish origin that can be localized to the Roman province of Judea. Studies of mtDNA show that Ashkenaz founding populations mated with local European women and did so on limited occasions. However, as the introduction to the article notes:

    “Studies of the paternally inherited Y chromosome have indicated that Ashkenazic Jews, Sephardic Jews, and Lebanese all have high frequencies of haplogroup J (as defined by the Y Chromosome Consor-tium 2002), in contrast to the populations of central Eu-rope (Ritte et al. 1993a
    ; Santachiara-Benerecetti et al.1993). Thomas et al. (1998) reported that a particular microsatellite haplotype (the “Cohen modal haplotype,”now known to be within haplogroup J) occurs at a high frequency in priests of Jewish groups that had been geographically separated for a long period. This led them to suggest that it could be a genetic signature of the ancient Hebrew population. Subsequent analyses have confirmed a substantial sharing of Y-chromosome haplotypes among different Jewish communities…”

    No finding of the research, which is described in the article, contradicts this basic point of prior research.

    As you note, research findings having to do with the geographic origins of Ashkenaz Jews are fraught with the potential for political misuse. Every popularized account of this research, I came across, is guilty of exactly this. However, these articles are biased in a direction opposite to that which you suspect, i.e., they are misreporting the research to suggest that Ashkenaz Jews – and other current Jewish populations – are not ultimately descended from a population of male Jewish migrants from the classical region in the Levant associated with Jews.

    I think Zionism has been a disaster for all the peoples of the Middle East, Jews and non-Jews alike. Zionist ideologues have irremediably corrupted the political system of my native country, the USA. The ideology has had additional negative impacts worldwide. Ultimately it will prove catastrophic for world Jewry. Furthermore, Zionists have utterly polluted archaeological research in the Levant, seeking proof for a mythical Jewish Kingdom which never existed. There is no need for those opposed to Zionism similarly to pollute genetic research for purposes of opposition to Zionism.

  33. Lance Welton’s articles are so mind-numbingly stupid that I now seriously have to ask if Ron Unz is just trolling the HBD idiots when he publishes this crap.

    • Replies: @Brás Cubas
  34. Stealth says:

    Countries like Guatemala, Honduras and Venezuela are some of the most violent in the world.

  35. Stealth says:
    @Fidelios Automata

    The best looking girl at my high school was half Chinese and half White. Good personality, too.

  36. @Sowhat

    Lester Holt, married to a White woman, Carol Hagen, with two mixed-race children. His news program sure seems to have a lot of race-related items.

  37. Rich says:

    I think you missed the part, or I’m missing something, where it is only theorized that there were males from the middle east somewhere in the distant past of the Ashkenazi. According to what I’ve read, there is Ashkenazi DNA found in Europe over 7500 years ago. It’s possible that male Hebrews were somehow involved, but that’s all supposition, since the majority of Israeli citizens are of European ancestry and want to somehow legitimize their claim to Israel based on this supposition. Obviously this is a sensitive issue, due to the politics, but from my research it seems pretty obvious the Ashkenazi have no “ancient” claim to their land. They do, however, have the claim of “Right of Conquest”, which is historically acceptable.

    And I did go over to your link and reread the research, but I still don’t see any evidence of Middle Eastern origin. They, the Ashkenazi, are of course, a distinct group, like any other European ethnicity. They are probably not descended from the Hebrews who were mostly wiped out by the Romans by the middle of the second century AD.

    • Replies: @RadicalCenter
  38. They did find that “genetic diversity” (their term for “mixed-race”) is associated with higher IQ, being taller, and having higher levels of education; likely due to being more intelligent. [Directional dominance on stature and cognition in diverse human populations, By P.K. Joshi et al., Nature, July 2015]

    Did they control for parents’ IQ/height/education?

    If the more common preference is for within-group mating, then to mate exogamously in a “dating market” one might need (on average) to compensate with some extra desirability in the form of intelligence, attractiveness, education, wealth etc to be acceptable to a mate from the other group, and vice versa. i.e. mixed race children in the real world may have genetically advantaged parents compared to a world where the mixture is by choosing couples at random from the respective populations, or children of the same pairings but in a dating market where everyone is blind to race. Essentially, personal or social prejudice is overcome by requiring better genetics.

    • Replies: @Brás Cubas
  39. utu says:
    @Jus' Sayin'...

    For centuries Europeans believed stories told by Gypsies that the came form Egypt.

    The origins of Ashkenazis are politically too important to be left to Jews to decide. Motives and biases of scientists and this affect fund the science may effect the results.

    Here is Bennett Greenspan, founder of Family Tree DNA:

    The urgency of our work is magnified by the fact that the legitimacy of the Jewish people and its claim to our ancestral home is currently under constant pseudo-historical attack. The media, particularly on the web, carries regular features from enemies of Israel describing theories to the effect that Ashkenazi Jews have no connection to the land of Israel and are, in fact, European and Central Asian interlopers.

    The Y-chromosome studies demonstrably prove otherwise — a majority of Ashkenazi male lineages are from the Middle East. As the various publicly known DNA test providers have assembled Jewish DNA databases — not just FamilyTreeDNA but my colleagues at 23andMe and Ancestry as well — we have found unmistakable evidence that Ashkenazi Jews are closely related to one another, meaning that from a genetic standpoint, all Jews are indeed part of one genetically united people with ample Middle Eastern and Mediterranean forebears.

    And as far as the rabbinical Judaism you could find many historians who do not share your opinion.

  40. Thomm says:
    @The Alarmist

    Your ideology comprises of petty faggotism. That ideology is White Trashionalism.

    You remind me of a saying from Confucius :

    “When a wise man points to the stars, the imbecile criticizes the finger. ”

    Plus, you are indignant that my point is profound and you cannot refute it.

    • Troll: The Alarmist
    • Replies: @The Alarmist
    , @Truth
  41. Mixed-Race People: Taller, More Intelligent, Better Looking? —But Also Crazy

    Taller? Check. A good 4″ taller than the average white male aged 53.

    More Intelligent? Check. 2.6σ smarter than the average bear, Boo-Boo!!!!.

    Better Looking? Aw Shucks… nice of you to notice. I mean… I’m not the one to say…

    Crazy? Sure… if by that you mean “unable to conceal my contempt for anything with “psych” in the name“. Also, just objectively a square peg, Morty. I’m not apologising for that, Morty.

    All that… just from a recent 25% Maori taint in my otherwise-Heinz57 Hispano-Celto-Franco-Finnish mongrel bloodsoup?

    Seems unlikely, bro: there’s quite a bit of genetic difference between Celtiberians, Frogs and Finns, for a start.

  42. @Intelligent Dasein

    Never fear. He will take measures. As a matter of fact, he was just waiting for a two-line comment from someone with a remarkably clever nickname to act.

  43. @Thomm

    You got it wrong again.

    I was deployed to many of those places for the purposes of advancing Uncle’s global low-intensity conflict, and yes, the locals are largely loco.

    There’s a reason the Third World is the Third World, and given the relative richness of the soil and abundance of other resources, I would dare say it has something to do with the intellect, ability, and stability of the locals.

  44. Jo A-S says:

    Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. The ladies pictures are not, in MY eyes, beautiful. Pretty, yes. And no, if I was single, I would not say “no,” as the saying goes.

  45. Truth says:

    You gon’ take that, Derb?

  46. Truth says:
    @Brás Cubas

    Askenazi “Jews” are Central Asian Khazars. No Semetic heritage to speak of.

  47. Truth says:

    Both are proud people who deserve a separate place under the Sun in which to flourish and prosper.

    Maybe one “under the Sun” one “on the Ice?”

  48. Truth says:


    I love Thomm, he comprizes The Unzistas own Terry Silver.

    • Replies: @Thomm
  49. Anonymous[346] • Disclaimer says:

    Agree. Filipinas are a nice mix. They’re gorgeous. NE Asian and white mix produces this look along with stature, which accentuates the beauty. Have you see women in Yakutsk, Russia?? They’re more NE Asian (my favorite look), but wow!

  50. Anonymous [AKA "George Fellows"] says:

    The statement that mixed race people are better looking than monoracial people is a matter of opinion. There’s no scientific data here to consider. What a coal-black negro from central Africa might think is beautiful is probably a whole lot different from what an average Russian man would think is attractive. One is usually attracted to the faces and bodies that are the most typical of one’s race and for females, neotony (or youth and breeding ability) is thrown in. Saying that Naomi Campbell is more beautiful than Charlize Theron is dependent upon who you are asking. I can only speak for myself in saying that I find any trace of the African (kinky hair, broad nose and/or lips) is an immediate turnoff for me.

  51. Anonymous [AKA "Joe Hawthorne"] says:

    Few things are more vomit-inducing to me than white men going into detail telling me how attractive they find non-white women, especially when the object of their desire are schoolgirls. Warning here this video is of teenagers who are under-age and while there is no pornography here, I can read between the lines and it says a lot about you as a person.

    • Replies: @Truth
  52. Anon[346] • Disclaimer says:

    I’m inclined to think that Naomi Campbell’s rages come from the chronic dieting models indulge in, not her ancestry. If she were as fat as nature intended her to be, she’d be pretty cheerful, though a lot poorer.

    I’d also be inclined to ascribe both taller height and higher IQ to the cow’s milk-drinking habit of those with European ancestry. It’s not just genes that make crossbreeds what they are, it’s your food. Even hormone-free cow’s milk has more natural growth hormone in it than sheep’s milk or goat’s milk, because nature is trying to make a very large animal.

    There’s a study out that indicates that people raised on non-cow milk are shorter than those raised on cows’ milk.

    Growth hormone doesn’t just affect your bones, it affects your brain cell division after you’re born. You’re going to be smarter if you take growth hormones, as well as more prone to cancer later in life.

  53. Thomm says:

    I love Thomm, he comprizes The Unzistas own Terry Silver.

    That is true. Terry Silver was a great villain, and word is he is returning in the second season of Cobra Kai.

  54. Mulegino1 says:
    @Jus' Sayin'...

    Wrong (mostly) again. Rabbinic Judaism, the source of modern Ashkenaz religious practices, derives from Pharisaic Judaism. The evidence for this is overwhelming. And if you’ve read your New Testament and have any knowledge of Jewish sects at the time, you will be aware that Pharisaic Judaism predates Christianity, e.g., all those references by Jesus to “Scribes and Pharisees”, and Paul’s regular declarations that he is a Pharisee and a student of Gamaliel, who was a student of Hillel.

    Contemporary Talmudism is not a continuation of the organic Pharisaism of the time of Christ, but the direct spiritual descendant of that fanatical rejectionist cult which arose subsequent to the life of Christ and the foundation of the Christian Church. Talmudism was merely an extension of the worst elements of a Pharisaical tradition of men which became more and more corrupted the further in time and doctrine it departed from the religion of the Patriarchs and Prophets which was fulfilled in its entirety by the life, death and resurrection of Christ. Its identity is wholly a negative one- the rejection of Christ, the demonization of Christians and Christianity in particular and the goyim in general, and a nasty, narcissistic worship of an unworthy, earthbound and unpleasant ethnic collective.

    Modern day Talmudic Judaism has nothing in common with the Old Testament religion other than the use of a few superficial symbols. At its inner core is collective self-worship, Christophobia and a
    murderous hatred of the goyim. The Talmud – the absolute authority of contemporary rabbinical Judaism- could rightly be said to be the greatest heap of literary rubbish ever to be compiled.

  55. Bliss says:

    Here’s a fine example of hybrid vigor, the French-African mulatto Joseph Bologne, the Chevalier de Saint-Georges:

    A road in Paris is named after him:

    Joseph Bologne, Chevalier de Saint-Georges, was a champion fencer, classical composer, virtuoso violinist, and conductor of the leading symphony orchestra in Paris. Born in Guadeloupe, he was the son of George Bologne de Saint-Georges, a wealthy planter, and Nanon, his African slave. During the French Revolution, Saint-Georges was colonel of the Légion St.-Georges, the first all-black regiment in Europe, fighting on the side of the Republic.

    Joseph was 13 when he was enrolled in Tessier de La Boëssière’s Académie royale polytechnique des armes et de ‘l’équitation (fencing and horsemanship). According to La Boëssière fils, son of the Master: “At 15 his [Saint-Georges’] progress was so rapid, that he was already beating the best swordsmen, and at 17 he developed the greatest speed imaginable.”[9] He was still a student when he beat Alexandre Picard, a fencing-master in Rouen, who had been mocking him as “Boëssière’s mulatto”, in public. That match, bet on heavily by a public divided into partisans and opponents of slavery, was an important coup for the latter. His father, proud of his feat, rewarded Joseph with a handsome horse and buggy.[10] In 1766 on graduating from the Academy, Joseph was made a Gendarme du roi (officer of the king’s bodyguard) and a chevalier.[11] Henceforth Joseph Bologne, by adopting the suffix of his father, would be known as the “Chevalier de Saint-Georges”.

    According to his friend, Louise Fusil: “… admired for his fencing and riding prowess, he served as a model to young sportsmen … who formed a court around him.”[12] A fine dancer, Saint-Georges was also invited to balls and welcomed in the salons (and boudoirs) of highborn ladies. “Partial for the music of liaisons where amour had real meaning… he loved and was loved.“[13] Yet he continued to fence daily in the various salles of Paris. It was there he met the Angelos, father and son, fencing masters from London, the mysterious Chevalier d’Éon, and the teenage Louis Philippe II, Duke of Orléans, all of whom would play a role in his future.

    Given his prodigious technique as an adult, Saint-Georges must have practised the violin seriously as a child. Yet, not before 1764, when violinist Antonio Lolli composed two concertos, Op.2 for him,[15] and 1766, when François Gossec dedicated a set of six string trios, Op.9[16] to Saint Georges, was it revealed that the famous swordsman also played the violin.

    In 1769, the Parisian public was amazed to see Saint-Georges, the great fencer, among the violins of Gossec’s new orchestra, Le Concert des Amateurs. Two years later he became its concertmaster, and in 1772 he created a sensation with his debut as a soloist, playing his first two violin concertos, Op. II, with Gossec conducting the orchestra. “These concertos were performed last winter at a concert of the Amateurs by the author himself, who received great applause as much for their performance as for their composition.”[19] According to another source, “The celebrated Saint-Georges, mulatto fencer [and] violinist, created a sensation in Paris … [when] two years later … at the Concert Spirituel, he was appreciated not as much for his compositions as for his performances, enrapturing especially the feminine members of his audience.”[20]

    Saint-Georges’ first compositions, Op. I, were a set of six string Quartets, among the first in France. They were inspired by Haydn’s earliest quartets imported from Vienna by the “eccentric” Baron Bagge,[according to whom?][note 2] whose musicales were frequented by some of the best musicians in Paris, including Joseph. Two more sets of six string quartets, three charming forte-piano and violin sonatas, a sonata for harp and flute and six violin duos make up his chamber music output. A cello sonata performed in Lille in 1792, a concerto for clarinet and one for bassoon were lost. Twelve additional violin concertos, two symphonies and eight symphonie-concertantes, a new, intrinsically Parisian genre of which Saint-Georges was one of the chief exponents complete the list of his instrumental works, published between 1771 and 1779, a short span of eight years. Six opéras comiques and a number of songs in manuscript complete the list of his works, remarkable considering his many extra-musical activities.

    Less than two years under his direction, “Performing with great precision and delicate nuances [the Amateurs] became the best orchestra for symphonies in Paris, and perhaps in all of Europe.”[21] As the Queen attended some of Saint-Georges’ concerts at the Palais de Soubise, arriving sometimes without notice, the orchestra wore court attire for all its performances. “Dressed in rich velvet or damask with gold or silver braid and fine lace on their cuffs and collars and with their parade swords and plumed hats placed next to them on their benches, the combined effect was as pleasing to the eye as it was flattering to the ear.”[22] Saint-Georges played all his violin concertos as soloist with his orchestra. Their corner movements are replete with daring batteries and bariolages,[note 3] brilliant technical effects made possible by the new bow designed by Nicholas Pierre Tourte Père – a perfect foil in the hands of a great swordsman. While their fast movements reveal the composer probing the outer limits of his instrument, his slow movements are lyrical and expressive, with an occasional touch of Creole nostalgia.

  56. KenH says:

    Witness the “hybrid vigor” of Mexico, Brazil, Haiti, India, Egypt and many other third world nations. Why do all the vigourous racial hybrids create shithole nations and many of their hybridized people wish to flee to the monoracial nations of the white West?

    The hard sciences in our top universities should be filled with mulattoes and other bi-racial people, but that’s not the case. The bi-racial people who probably would be the most represented are probably a mix of East Asian and white European.

    Iceland is considered very inbred from a racial and genetic standpoint but excepting for the weather it has beautiful women, friendly people and is a highly livable nation. S. Korea and Japan are lacking in hybrid vigor and two of the few livable nation outside of Europe and N. America.

    Of course there are a exceptions and outliers. A few months ago I was at a major drugstore and I saw a tall, stunningly beautiful female with a well proportioned body who appeared to be a quadroon. It was a good thing I wasn’t wearing sweatpants. Of course, I had no idea what her IQ was and didn’t care given her looks.

    • Agree: Curmudgeon
  57. @Rich

    They are predominantly Semitic/Middle Eastern and Italian, often in close to equal proportions, for reasons explained by others above.

  58. Truth says:

    So pedophilia is the lesser offense to miscegenation here? Did I get this correct?

  59. @Rich

    Ashkenazim studied were substantially Semitic / Middle Eastern, as well as Italian. Useful Jon Entine column for Genetic Literacy Project, I think 2013.

  60. @Thomm

    Putting aside your examples, the article is still stupid.
    My parents’ parents were from different Northern European countries. My father was taller than his father, and I am taller than my father was. Same goes for my mother. She was taller than her mother.
    Filipino couples coming to North America and having children, were having high rates of Cesarean sections, because the foetus would not fit through the mother’s pelvic outlet. Those children grow up to be near North American size adults. It’s all about diet for people or relatively the same size.
    If a 6’6″ Norwegian begets a child with a 4’6″ pygmy woman, the chance of the offspring being over 6’6″ is slim to none, and that doesn’t consider taking in two other variables – “better looking” and “smarter”.

    • Replies: @Incoh
  61. Cato says:

    Well, I am a bit mixed, like all meztizos, but not that tall, nor –according to my wife — that intelligent.

    • LOL: RadicalCenter
  62. @Saxon

    I was about to make a comment about how dumb this article is..then I read a few of the comments and… well never mind.

    I saw one half decent comment in the first 5 and thats that. same idiocy….like the talk about skidso in mixed people, Caribbeans and so on.

    I know Caribbeans rather well. I am one myself and mixed..white father..and I know that the skidso is not genetic from the ethnic mixing but from that rose out of master-slave society, then post slavery and colonial exploitative social/racial mix. that toxic brew produced a social hell that still functions as hell, out of which little to no human sanity can come

    just look at their cultural inheritance..race supremacy on one side inferiority on the other and the contribution a twisted up society makes to the mind and you have the skidso personality right there. you can go where the next half of your brothers and sisters can because of skin tones.

    my father for example..the white man… was a strict, brutal catholic mutherfucker, with a leather belt for discipline that never brought any such thing. it brought mental dysfunction and years of corrective work.

    then school which was no different and the preference for you by the teacher because of your mix..and utter brutality to the black ones like my docile mother.

    there were Black boys whose tendencies one could detect from young would be hostile as they grew up. teachers rarely terrorized those kids. they would grow up and no doubt would have long memories.

    whatever mental illness in mixed people could not possibly be generally genetic but social..maybe now that we have lived the cultural shit or race and classism of divided, exploitative society so long it is finding expression in our genes. you guys should try a lil Black face with white skin and go live in the west indies

    also to be facile…I suppose that if mixing meant insanity instead of hybrid vigor we would have to watch out for the plants that combined in the wild. they should be crazy and looking for us to do some damage…even more so with those gene-spliced devil plants we engineered supposedly to ‘feed’ ourselves. those by now, should be getting ready to eat us instead

    • Replies: @Saxon
  63. stupid racist thread overall..a magnet for the idiot racists who appear to be all here.

    the people of the world cant be bothered. no matter their material conditions they do as they find useful to survive. and all they do turn out to be positive.

    almost all hungry, poor, ordinary people do, using the basic ingredients of life turns out to be valid, useful, with legs to run. look at what hungry people did with food to survive: Pizza, Roti, this pie and that one.

    when all you had to eat was rice, or flour, or corn, this or that starch…you made all sorts of things with rice..and flour etc. we picked wild grasses that appeared to have potential to eat and they did.

    look at our menu today..right across the globe..full of ingredients a rich man would not spit first! until he realized that those wild, cheap foods meant to human health and survival..WHY WE ARE STILL HERE!

    then he took them, made them look different and began to sell them BACK to us at cost.

    but ordinary people cant be bothered..not in the least. they do on their days what means something of value to them.

    it is not criminal behavior simply survival behavior. and it is always opposed to the full weight of existing social order and power that has made the behavior in question taboo.

    but the people do it anyway. the question is why? there must be some even more powerful countervailing natural force that drives a Japanese woman for example, to love and marry a Black man..a union that produced Osaka, the tennis champion, and her amazing sister

    look at that Girl! Osaka! Incredible! she is literally a perfect human being! I was sooprised to note that she is as tall as Serena. she seems so smart, on top of things, very quiet and in control. Osaka is impressive indeed…not as much as Serena yet but she is on her way

    and that powerful countervailing force that trumps the racist fools all the time…..?????


  64. Excal says:

    If some idiot is going to claim all ‘mixed race under US definitions’ people are mentally unstable, you better be willing to say that the entire populations of Mexico, Brazil, Thailand, and Kazakhstan are mentally unstable.

    You know, now that you mention it ..

  65. Bliss says:

    A good number of the highest achieving men of Europe were of part african ancestry:



    Pushkin, the Shakespeare of Russia:

    Alexandre Dumas:

    George Bridgetower:

    • Replies: @angelikki
  66. Bliss says:





    • Replies: @Alden
    , @Nona
    , @angelikki
  67. @Sowhat

    This short and informative video sheds much light on what’s behind the explosion of black/white romantic imagery in American advertising.

    • Replies: @Truth
    , @ACommenter
  68. Truth says:
    @mark green

    LOL. What is white men’s excuse for forsaking the women of Europe (at least in fantasy) for those of the Asian diaspora? They don’t need one?

    • Replies: @Saxon
  69. @Ben Sampson

    You’re definitely making a strong case for the “crazy” part of the article.

    • Replies: @kiismerhe
  70. kiismerhe says:
    @Buster Keaton’s Stunt Double

    I think below a certain IQ people seem to be crazy when talking (writing) too much.

  71. jhan says:

    Naomi Campell isn’t pretty…her face is way too big

    • Replies: @Alden
  72. Alden says:

    I think I’m not going to participate in this one. I stopped reading at Naomi Campbell is intelligent because she studied ballet LOL till you fall off the couch.

    She “ studied” ballet because many girls do and because her tall thin pretty mother was a model. Mother knew Naomi was qualified to be a model so sent her to ballet classes. FYI Weltin, ballet classes are full of models and actors

  73. Alden says:

    That’s a bad picture. She’s getting old. For some reason fashion models are supposed to have big heads as the big head balances the unusual bodies or something. Tall and thin is more important for fashion models than a pretty face.

  74. Alden says:

    Einstein was actually Australian aborigine in his mother’s side.

  75. Alden says:

    I tend to agree with you. Naomi Campbell is crazy because she probably has 10% White ancestry and a Chinese grandmother. The author is the crazy one.

    Her temper tantrums aren’t craziness, just standard black behavior. Plus, like most celebrities her age, she was surrounded by drugs, hard to avoid in those circles. Plus the dieting all models have to do when they reach a certain age

  76. Truth says:

    Elite models are crazy because they are eunuchs forced to take estrogen from a very young age, and castrated before puberty.

    All of them.

    End of discussion.

  77. Nona says:

    I’m laughing till tears are coming at the Shakespeare and Einstein pictures. Is this just you, or is there a black cabal out there conspiring to re-write history since they live in a culture they didn’t create and can’t really do much to change that? Othello is probably what makes you say that. Othello was actually written in the 13th century by somebody in an Italian city-state. It’s an old story, and Shakespeare was good at re-writing old stories. That is what most of his plays are. What about all those Danes, Scots, Italians that occupied his skills much more? I heard Shakespeare was Irish. Never did get why, and I don’t buy it. You’re goofy. Just goofy. There is no evidence of Beethoven as blackish unless somebody decided to paint him that way. A Jewish person did try to tell me that one time, but he was a Marxist wanna-be who used to go to Communist meet-ups at Columbia. Typical.
    In any case, the accomplishments of the white west depend on countless white (yeah, unfortunately) people, not 5 persons somebody decided had a 1/4 black (or more likely middle eastern) great grandparent.

  78. klokman says:

    One man’s miracle is another man’s engineering. One man’s mold is another man’s delicatessen. One man’s goddess is another man’s harridan. One man’s genius is another man’s fool.

    Some women have the face that fakeup will emulate the latest rave, another fakeup will diminish, another its required to be tolerable. But all women’s faces look the same in the shower.

    Having spent my formative years in a bi-racial family, foreigners who those siblings married were all of average height and less than notable intelligence, including all their numerous offspring. None of them have risen to any level of social or economic or academic prominence. Neither any of the bi-racial folks in their social circles, nor those I encountered in business venues from orient to occident had distinguished themselves of note. Man celebrates the delusive ideal–

    Fashion is built on the premise a person can appear to be what they are not;

    Academia is built on the premise that a person can appear smarter than (s)he has wit;

    Entertainment is built on the premise an actor possesses attributes they usually lack;

    Business success is fueled on the premise a person is expert in wealth accumulation when they are poor in spirit;

    Politics is waged on the premise some are gifted to govern others when such are in fact least able.

  79. Saxon says:
    @Ben Sampson

    We have empirical data from the United States. One of the most common mixes there is white + east Asian. Neither of these groups do very poorly in the US. Both of these types of groups can build and maintain advaned countries on their own. None of this nonsenical whining you’re doing here even applies to this control group, and yet in this control group the mixed people have much higher incidence rates of mental illness and social ills (substance abuse, sexual promiscuity, suicide etc.) are much higher than in the monoracial groups.

    You can’t explain this away with some kind of narrative-spinning bleating about supposed “social constructs.” Nor can you explain away malfunctioning immune systems and other issues related with outbreeding depression with “social constructs.”

  80. Saxon says:

    You’re probably not tall enough for this ride but it has to do with the “sexual market dynamics” of today where a large percentage of white women price themselves out of the market and waste their youth providing a virtual harem to a small percentage of unusually attractive men. So some of very average white guys do this. It’s of course not a good idea, but the pressures creating this effect come from the top-down and this is likely an intended result.

    Women have been allowed total sexual freedom with no consequences and this is the result. Too many vie for the top guys and you end up with these middle-aged wine aunt cat ladies who fawn over someone like Beta O’Rourke oblivious to how this looks to the rest of the world. So some of these guys look elsewhere and this is what you find happening.

    It reminds me of a story that may have been linked from Steve Sailer’s blog linking to some early middle-aged white woman teaching English in Japan and her lament of how awful it supposedly was for a woman to do this job in Japan and how few last long there because no guys were interested in her, either any of the white guys there teaching or the local Japanese guys. She noted however that none of these white guys that she disparaged as being below her (really most of them were either her peer or even better than her) had any problem getting with what she gauged to be “gorgeous” Japanese women, who themselves were probably just very average and she insecure around them as they weren’t as much of a turbocunt as she was and so weren’t having issues.

    That’s the thing, though. Too many (especially white) women are spending their youths hopping from bed to bed with men way out of their league, and then actually thinking these are the kinds of guys they can expect to commit to them. As a result they end up middle-aged and alone like that English teacher and still thinking they’re better than the men they couldn’t afford to have alienated as one of the best commentators on the subject, F. Roger Devlin, would put in in describing this broad phenomenon. These men under a normal, healthy assortative mating system would have been the ones that would have been their actual husband material.

  81. Truth says:

    So, to summarize shortly; adherence to one’s race is necessary, and to be accepted, for the (albino) goose but not for the gander?

    I keep hearing this nonsense about “I can’t find any white gurrrlllz” stuff over and over, but I go out on the street and I see white gurlz with normal-looking, white guys with jobs.

    Generally not particularly tall, muscular or attractive.

    I don’t get it.

  82. @mark green

    part of it was an EOE ruling that if you had only white people in your ads, it was a discriminatory work environment – so by definition, you had to have mixed races in your ads.. because many ads show couples, again by definition you were required by law to have mixed raced couples.

    • Replies: @mark green
  83. @Wally Streeter

    I want a girl
    Just like the girl
    Who married
    Dear old Dad

  84. eah says:

    Fundamentally ‘mixed race’ people are the outcome of individual sexual choices, which are none of my business — but it is virtually impossible to find tissue matches for them, hence organ transplants are also nearly impossible (among other medical issues).

  85. AaronB says:

    Not just that, but all modern European populations are descendent from various different stocks mixing.

    One sees this easily with Britons – some are quite dark and hairy with an almost Med look, while others are Nordic blond.

    Japan is a huge melting pot with variegated types etc etc.

    Anyways this is pretty par for the course with regard to HBD articles – dumb narratives that select facts l.

    • Replies: @angelikki
  86. @ACommenter

    Methinks you did not watch this documentary in its entirety. As it notes, if multiple races are required to meet an advertising goal or a government mandate, then we would see white females with Asian men, Hispanic men with black women, white men with Asian females and various other potential pairings in equal measure to the black male / white female advertising meme. But that is not the case at all.

    Throughout American print and TV advertising (which is dominated by Jews we learn) the viewer witnesses an overwhelmingly collection of images involving just black men with pretty (and young) white females, often in romantic if not sexual settings. This persistent pattern is clearly no accident.

    There a hyper-abundance of imagery showing white females with black men even though black males maked up just 6% of the US population.

    Why are Asian and Hispanic men virtually invisible?

    This unbalanced campaign is indicative of an an orchestrated agenda.

  87. angelikki says:

    i am aryan european, pureblood, tall, and pretty.

    and the mestizos are ugly to my eyes: naomi campbel is no way better than a pureblood claudia schiffer or eva herzigova

    negro males are simply awful.

  88. angelikki says:

    you are surely a dirty jew.

    europeans come all from indoeuropean populatins, so ARYANS. as our genetics show- R1a/R1b, with the highest degree of genetical homogeneity.

    no semitic- and hamitic shit in europeans.

    and we will remain pure, since we despise shit.

  89. angelikki says:

    calling marx and einstein ‘clever’ means you don’t know their theories are pure BS even among researchers, especially einstein’s relativity, destroyed in the last years by quantic physics of tesla and corentin kevran

  90. angelikki says:

    shakespeare, pushkin and beethoven not for sure.

    the other two are just ugly as all the mestizos

  91. @ThreeCranes

    Don’t we all.

    Long established argument: since values exists only _within_ cultures, it is impossible (by that definition) to determine the value of any culture. Therefore, no culture can be inferior or superior to any other, as the terms just don’t apply between cultures. Nobody has the authority, or even a logical basis, for saying that one culture is “better” than another, as there are no authorities greater than culture.
    This idea sounds great. I think it’s an expansion of the religion neutrality that ended the 30 years war, which was said to be a religous war, but if so was a war that Western religion lost.
    And you can easily expand that to any other group of humans, from the left handed all the way down to street gangs. Extending the argument to races is trivial.

    So: we have yet another theory of everything with yet another set of new defintions. Here’s a different example of the same processs of winning by definition: — tall is a height over ten freet (giraffes are tall), and short is less than one inch (bees are short) — lo, nobody is tall or short. Does the theory reflect reality? The Is/ Ought dichotomy applies here. If there is significant divergence between the Is of observation and the Ought of theory (or preferences, hard to tell the difference sometimes) then the theory should be reconsidered quite carefully.

    A specific question: is the Ought an attempt to cope with reality (or, perhaps what J. Peterson calls “chaos”), or an attempt to avoid it?

    Well, take a look a this:
    or this:

    Most recently, the Bantu expansion descendents in South Africa have taken out the Aryan expansion descendents in the same area, even though the Aryans arrived there first and had better weapons. This stuff just never stops.

    An awful lot of peoples were subsumed by these two expansions. One may think of one’s self as a Bantu or an Aryan, and say “These are the fortunate circumstances that brought about our present ddominance”, but, ah, you’d have to, wouldn’t you? Few if the subsumed human groups aren’t here to lament their passing. Those who criticize displacement of the American Indians don’t give the remaining American Indians anything, or even propose to, so one would assume that they are, under their breath, congratulating rather than conemning themselves.

    So, you can say that all groups deserve respect and a place under the sun. Well, OK. Can you enforce that? If you live in the US, you know very well that _nobody_ gets respect and a place under the sun (althought they do get to complain about not getting it), even though respect and a place has been Federal policy since c.a. AD 1970 and many highly exploitative organizations claim to advocate respect and a place under the sun, while simultaneously condemning entire groups of humans to haveing no respect and no place under the sun. Same, it seems, in Europe.

    Saying “respect and a place under the sun” seems more likely to be _avoidance_ of reality / chaos that an actual proposal for coping with reality / chaos. Combat medics tend to tell everybody conscious that they’ll recover, no matter what the wound, to lessen prompt psychological trauma. Is “respect and a place under the sun” the same thing?

    _Systemantics_ points out that every plan for world peace includes, as an integral part, an army. Why, exactly, does world peace need an army? Why, exactly, does an egalitarian society so strongly oppose egalitarianism?


  92. Incoh says:

    Welton already specifically pointed out that hybrid vigor only applies to “reasonable similar” parent-mixing. Your attempted “debunking sample” was literally already addressed, something you would know if you actually read.
    You are a contrarian retardation, shut the fuck up and learn to properly engage in a debate.

  93. Namey says:

    My mother is black (and is also partly Chinese). My father is white. My mother is highly educated and extremely intelligent. My father is of average intelligence.
    I am a slim, young woman of above-average height and currently make a living modelling, but I am also the top of my science cohort at my prestigious university, and I was quickly labelled “gifted” (more of a burden than a point of pride, really) as a child because of my extremely high IQ (higher than my mother’s, which is also above the 99th percentile).
    Rather than boast (further) about my various achievements (often in international competitions) throughout my life, I will simply end with this:
    I am, by no means, “nuts” (although choosing to devote attention to insane and inane drivel like the above article does sometimes make me wonder whether my judgment is entirely sound).

    • Replies: @The Hulkster
  94. @Namey

    Nobody believes anything you said. What is your extremely high IQ. To be honest, it’s more likely a stupid person would label their IQ “extremely high”. Intelligent people would refer to their abnormal IQ as Extra ordinary. Efficiency is a trait of intelligent people. Out of curiosity, what’s your mother’s IQ? The odds are against an African/Chinese woman having an IQ in the 99%. Africans have an average IQ of less than 70. The Chinese have an average IQ of 98. Women are usually dumb. Share the name of the prestigious university you attend while fulfilling your supermodel career.

  95. Guess what? Most of this is false, all of it is suspect. Race mixing has been #1 on the propaganda list 40 years. It’s a psyop to break the white race. Race mixing is wrong on every level, and we’re under attack at every level.

    • Replies: @Atle
  96. Atle says: god.

    Tell me I didn’t see that.

  97. Atle says:

    That’s a long editing period right there.

  98. Atle says:
    @the grand wazoo

    Actually, that’s completely right. The people who control the media really do hate the white race.

    It’s like biting the hand that feeds you times ten.

  99. Sara says:

    Most of the comments here are absolutely senseless. Did anyone here read psyche report on Naomi Campbell? What a leap of logic to assume that her mixed ancestry is the direct cause of her actions? My guess is Ms. Campbell is a spoiled brat and nothing more.

    I suppose most of the people here cannot abide mixed race individuals because their very existence is at odds with their view of European superiority.

    Moreover, civilizations rise and fall. The Romans believed the Northern – Europeans were absolute barbarians. Remember the extraordinary accomplishments of the Muslims in the 7th century? Was it not the Muslims world that preserved the work of Aristotle? What about Algebra? Is Christianity’s origin European or is it a faith adopted by the Europeans?

    • Replies: @Pepe Casas
  100. @Thomm

    “you better be willing to say that the entire populations of Mexico, Brazil, Thailand, and Kazakhstan are mentally unstable.”
    As a latino, yes.
    Live in Mexico/Brazil for 3-4 years and see your future.

  101. @Sara

    “I suppose most of the people here cannot abide mixed race individuals because their very existence is at odds with their view of European superiority.”
    No, If you ever bother to look at stadistic you will now that they´re indeed crazy.
    Just look at North Brazil.

Current Commenter

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone

 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Lance Welton Comments via RSS
The unspoken statistical reality of urban crime over the last quarter century.
Talk TV sensationalists and axe-grinding ideologues have fallen for a myth of immigrant lawlessness.
Which superpower is more threatened by its “extractive elites”?
How a Young Syndicate Lawyer from Chicago Earned a Fortune Looting the Property of the Japanese-Americans, then Lived...
Becker update V1.3.2