The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 Mary Phagan-Kean Archive
Mary Phagan’s Family Opposes Exoneration of Sex Killer Leo Frank
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>
Mary Phagan-Kean honoring her great-aunt, Mary Phagan

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

MY NAME is Mary Phagan-Kean and I am the great-niece and namesake of “Little Mary Phagan,” the thirteen-year-old girl who was raped and murdered by Leo Max Frank, the president of Atlanta’s B’nai B’rith Lodge No. 144, on April 26, 1913.

Leo Frank was the manager of the National Pencil Company — a sweatshop factory where over a hundred children labored, and where the Sam Nunn federal building stands today. Little Mary Phagan was 12 years old when she started working there in 1912, and Frank admitted he was the last person to see Mary alive.

In fact, the evidence of his guilt was overwhelming and on August 25, 1913, after a month-long trial in the Fulton County Superior Court, Leo Frank was found guilty by a jury of his peers, and on the next day, he was sentenced to hang for the murder of Mary Phagan.

What followed was an unprecedented effort by Leo Frank and his legal team and supporters to pin this horrific crime on everyone but himself. It is an effort that continues to this very day. The Leo Frank case is no “cold case.” It is obvious to anyone who objectively considers the case evidence that Leo Frank was rightly convicted for this heinous crime.

Today, his supporters have targeted a black man named James Conley who worked as a janitor at the factory. Evidence shows that after Frank beat and strangled Mary he was unable to move the body. He called on Conley and ordered him to help him conceal the crime and swore him to secrecy. After initially concealing Frank’s crime Conley ultimately revealed to authorities the true events of that day. The detail he gave was so shocking and so convincing that he became the state’s star witness against Leo Frank. Frank and his legal team’s response was to accuse Conley of the murder, and that has been their story for a century.

But Mary’s killer was not James Conley, and the state of Georgia proved beyond any reasonable doubt that Leo Frank alone murdered Little Mary Phagan.

The Phagan family has no objection to anyone expressing their opinions about the Leo Frank case, but we do insist that organizations and personal campaigns not distort the truth and facts to use this case for their own political purposes. For over 100 years, each passing decade brought with it dubious revelations of “new historical evidence” falsely claiming to exonerate Leo Frank. The Phagan family has stated since 1982 that if there were clear-cut evidence to clear Leo Frank of this heinous crime, we would be the first to ask for an exoneration. However, such historical evidence has never come to light. Rather, there are considerable data, extensive documentation, revealing archival material, and legal, court, and government records that only support and even strengthen the guilty verdict.

Phagan Family’s Statement on the Latest Attempt to Exonerate Leo Frank

It was reported in the Atlanta Journal and Constitution that on April 26, 2019 [ironically 106 years to the day after Mary Phagan’s murder] that the Fulton County District Attorney Paul Howard [defeated by Fani Willis on November 6, 2020] had established a “Conviction Integrity Unit” that he said would review the Leo Frank conviction of 1913. Those named as participants in this move were the following:

  • Former Governor Roy Barnes
  • Rabbi Steven Lebow
  • Attorney Dale Schwartz
  • Melissa D. Redmon, director of the University of Georgia Law School
  • Former Supreme Court Justice Leah Ward Sears
  • Former Court Chief Justice Norman Fletcher
  • Former Cobb County Superior Court Chief Judge J. Stephen Schuster
  • Assistant District Attorney Van Pearlberg

The Family of Mary Phagan believes that these individuals have colluded since August of 2018 to find a way to vacate the murder conviction. ADL attorney Dale Schwartz was quoted thus: “we’re still trying to get a new trial that would, in effect, exonerate him.” [In 1914, several attempts were made to “exonerate” Leo Frank using “new evidence” that included witness affidavits later found to have been forged or obtained by bribery and other illegal means. See the Atlanta Constitution of May 5, 1914, p. 1.]

Clearly, the new agency was a blatantly political scheme that had nothing to do with justice. It was set up, it appears, at the behest of the above-mentioned Frank advocates for one purpose only — to help Leo Frank escape culpability for his crime. According to the Atlanta Journal-Constitution (May 7, 2019), Fulton County D.A. Paul Howard stated, “The Frank Case helped inspire the creation of the new unit” and that former Gov. Roy Barnes “will serve as a consultant.” Barnes admitted that he “had lobbied the district attorney [Howard] to re-examine Frank’s case.”

Let us be clear what that means. Those statements alone convince us that the Conviction Integrity Unit has already determined the outcome of the Leo Frank case. According to the article, “Barnes said he is convinced that this will happen. ‘There is no doubt in my mind, and we’ll [Who is “we?” — Ed.] prove it at the appropriate time, that Frank was not guilty.’”

For years Roy Barnes has been promoting a fraudulent narrative about the Frank case, and in particular that the 1913 trial was illegitimate because it was “mob-dominated.” He said that “there were just mobs of people. And as the jury would go [to] the courthouse every day, the mob would scream, “Hang the Jew or we’ll hang you!”[1]Watch this video at 1:40 mark: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4tgKcqOXyhc

This charge is a blatant lie that has been disproven by the scholars of the case. It was made up long after the trial by an overzealous writer trying to make a name for himself. Only Barnes continues to repeat it.[2]See https://littlemaryphagan.com/wp-content/uploads/2020...es.pdf For this and many other reasons Governor Roy Barnes is simply unfit to participate in any serious inquiry into the Leo Frank case.

Fulton County District Attorney Paul Howard (with former Governor Roy Barnes) announces “Conviction Integrity Unit” to re-open Leo Frank case. Atlanta Journal-Constitution, May 7, 2019. Once again, most advocates and so-called experts who determine Leo Frank is not guilty have relied on blatantly false information and politically biased propaganda. Frank’s conviction was upheld by thirteen separate courts and judges in his thirteen appeals from Fulton County to the United States Supreme Court. Every court affirmed the trial was fair and the jury was not “mob terrorized.”

What’s more, driven by the need to exonerate a Jewish leader, they intend to convict an innocent African American man, James Conley — Frank’s employee that he ordered to help move the body. They ignore the 20 young girls and women who testified under oath that Frank sexually harassed them at the factory. Frank’s attorneys refused to cross-examine ANY of them, and later admitted that they were all telling the truth.[3]https://littlemaryphagan.com/the-murder-trial-testim...dence/

Nonetheless, Frank’s advocates spread fabrications, propagandize falsehoods, distort the facts and change headlines of original newspapers to promote the hoax of not guilty. The real miscarriage of justice is that in this time of the #MeToo movement, they seek to override a duly convicted child rapist and murderer’s conviction.

The Evidence Points to Leo Frank’s Guilt

Most people are not aware that there was blood and hair evidence at the murder scene, that Frank changed his alibi several times and lied to police, and that he sexually harassed his young girl employees. Most people are unaware that Leo Frank hired private detectives who planted evidence and bribed and intimidated witnesses to change their testimony. They even hatched a plot to murder the African American James Conley who became a key witness against Leo Frank.[4]Atlanta Journal, May 5, 1914, 2. Atlanta Constitution May 6, 1914, 1, 5. New York Times, May 6, 1914, 3.

Most people are not aware that the two detective firms Leo Frank hired; the Pinkertons’ National Detective Agency and the Burns Detective Agency concluded Leo Frank was guilty of the murder!

At his own trial Leo Frank refused to be sworn on the Bible and be cross-examined. A lot has been covered up about the case, including Leo Frank playing the race card to play to the white jurors’ prejudices about black men.

In 1915 and under intense political pressure Gov. John M. Slaton commuted Frank’s death sentence to life imprisonment. But even as he signed that commutation order he also wrote that the U.S. Supreme Court “found in the trial no error in law” and had “correctly in my judgment [found] that there was sufficient evidence to sustain the verdict.”

The fact is that Leo M. Frank was found guilty under Georgia law with facts and evidence, not with political bullying. The good people of Georgia can make up their own minds about Leo Frank’s innocence or guilt by delving into the historical records themselves. Having researched the Leo Frank/Mary Phagan murder case, including spending thousands of hours examining court records, newspaper reports, and private and public archives, I ask you to please consider the following facts:

Sexual harassment by Leo Frank: the Harvey Weinstein of his era

On Saturday April 26, 1913, Leo Frank used the opportunity of a deserted factory and his power as the company boss to lure Little Mary Phagan to a back area of the factory and attempt to rape her. Mary resisted and, and in the struggle Frank struck her and knocked her unconscious, and then strangled her to death. He left a trail of clues leading to himself, so within a few days of the murder he was arrested.

Evidence showed that the murder was sexually motivated, and many of Leo Frank’s own female employees testified to Leo Frank’s history of sexual harassment. They testified that he “got too familiar,” “put his hands on” them, tried to corner them, and proposed sexual acts to them for money.

These teenagers bravely took the witness stand and spoke of Leo Frank’s lewd behavior. Sixteen-year-old Nellie Wood told the court how Frank had pushed himself against her and touched her breast. Fourteen-year-old Nellie Pettisa witness for the defense—recounted how Leo Frank had propositioned her for sex. Twenty girls in all gave similar testimony about Frank’s improprieties. Several male employees described how they had witnessed Leo Frank “rub up against” young female workers “a little too much.” The testimony was so explicit that the judge had to clear the courtroom of women.

The defense attorneys did not even attempt to cross-examine any of the girls who testified at trial about Leo Frank’s lewd behavior. Instead, Leo Frank’s lawyers argued that his improper behavior was not wrong—that it was a sign of more liberal times! One even said in his closing argument, “Deliver me from one of these prudish fellows that never looks at a girl and never puts his hands on her…”

In the South the LOVE of Jews reigned supreme — not anti-Semitism!

“Anti-Semitism is absolutely not the reason for this libel that has been framed against me. It isn’t the source nor the result of this sad story.” — Leo M. Frank, interviewed by Abraham Cahan of the Forward newspaper

Most people are unaware that the prosecutor Hugh Dorsey first brought his case against Leo Frank before a 23-member grand jury that included five prominent members of the Jewish community (including at least two from Frank’s own synagogue), and all the grand jurors signed the bill of indictment against Leo Frank.

The trial judge, Leonard Roan, was once a law partner of one of Frank’s defense attorneys, Luther Rosser and, according to a confidential ADL memo: “In general, the rulings of the trial Judge had been favorable to the defense.” Leo Frank’s defense attorney even declared after the trial: “[W]e do not make the least criticism of Judge Roan, who presided [over the trial]. Judge Roan is one of the best men in Georgia and is an able and conscientious judge.”

The false claims of anti-Semitism before, during, and after the trial of Leo Frank are simply unfounded and untrue. The detailed daily accounts by the three Atlanta newspapers — the Constitution, the Georgian, and the Journal, each of which had Jewish editors — reflected no anti-Jewish bias at all. Leo Frank’s religion is only alluded to when it is reported that he is the president of ‘B’nai B’rith, and he is written of with the utmost respect for his prominence in the community. In fact, a University of Georgia study showed that the reportage by Atlanta’s three dailies was openly pro-Leo Frank and exhibited a pronounced pro-Frank bias.

Author Steve Oney, listed by the Anti-Defamation League as an expert on the Leo Frank case, reported: “To the extent that there was bias in the coverage, it was mostly in Frank’s favor…” He goes on to state that Atlanta’s newspapers, “evincing the prejudices of the time, ridiculed the state’s star witness—a black factory janitor named Jim Conley…”

It has been claimed that “anti-Semitism” and the “hatred of Jews” motivated Leo Frank’s conviction and lynching. And yet, incredibly, there was no anti-Semitism expressed by police, detectives, prosecutors, jurors, judge, or reporters! There was no “prejudicial trial” or “mob rule” or anti-Jewish bigotry of any kind.

Mr. Oney refutes the claim that there were anti-Semitic mobs shouting “Hang the Jew!” He told the Jewish Journal:

“[I]t didn’t happen. It was something that someone wrote a couple [of] years after the crime, and then it got stuck into subsequent recountings of the story….Jews were accepted in the city, and the record does not substantiate subsequent reports that the crowd outside the courtroom shouted at the jurors: ‘Hang the Jew or we’ll hang you.’” Though there is no record of “anti-Semitism” on the part of the crowd, the courtroom audience, the press, or the prosecutors, that doesn’t mean it was non-existent. As the evidence of his guilt became overwhelming, Leo Frank and his lawyers tried desperately to insert “anti-Semitism” into the trial as a diversionary tactic. They actually staged a courtroom confrontation with a prosecution witness over his alleged previous “anti-Semitic” statements. This officially brought “anti-Semitism” into the trial for the first time. Turns out that witness was working for the Leo Frank defense and was planted to promote their “anti-Semitism” agenda. It was yet another trick by the Leo Frank defense to undermine the court proceeding and to neutralize the evidence of his guilt.

The ADL has been promoting a lie for over a century!

“HANG THE JEW, HANG THE JEW” is what the Anti-Defamation League says was chanted during the month-long trial, but its own expert Steve Oney says it NEVER OCCURRED!

According to Steve Oney, at the time of Mary Phagan’s murder, “Atlanta was a philo-Semitic city. Its assimilated, German-Jewish elite were part of the financial and legal power structure…” Gov. John Slaton in his commutation order also addressed the false claim of an “anti-Semitic mob” surrounding the courtroom pressing to lynch Leo Frank: “No such attack was made and…none was contemplated.” Gov. John Slaton countered the false claim of an “anti-Semitic” atmosphere by reminding Leo Frank supporters that Jews were highly respected and appreciated in Georgia because they had been “conspicuous” contributors to the history and development of the state.[5]https://littlemaryphagan.com/wp-content/uploads/2020...an.pdf

Frank’s Jewish defenders believed he was guilty

By the time of his lynching in 1915 many people — including his Jewish supporters — not only were repelled by Leo Frank’s abrasive personality but also believed he was in fact the murderer of Mary Phagan. Chicago icon Albert Lasker, a Jewish philanthropist and the “father of modern advertising,” paid millions (in today’s money) for Leo Frank’s defense, but he privately admitted that he was not even convinced that Leo Frank was innocent.

Lasker financed all of Frank’s post-conviction appeals and orchestrated his international public-relations campaign that involved media outlets across the nation, including the New York Times. Albert Lasker recalled the meeting in Frank’s jail cell:

It was very hard for us to be fair to him, he impressed us as a sexual pervert. Now, he may not have been—or rather a homosexual or something like that…”

According to Lasker’s biographer, the men with him during that encounter took “a violent dislike to him.” Lasker “hated him,” and said, “I hope he [Leo Frank] gets out…and when he gets out I hope he slips on a banana peel and breaks his neck.”

Leo Frank’s Trial Defense was one of the most RACIST in American History

Though “anti-Semitism” was not a factor in his trial, Leo Frank’s racism certainly was: Frank’s defense attorneys used the word “nigger” and other racist slurs dozens of times in court. His main attorney told the jury: “If you put a nigger in a hopper, he’ll drip lies.”

Leo Frank argued in court that the many black witnesses that testified against him should not be believed — simply because they were black — and that “negro testimony” — as they referred to it — was by definition inferior and unreliable. At trial Leo Frank’s attorney castigated the white jurors for even considering the testimony of the black witnesses:

They would rather believe the negro’s word….Oh, how times have changed. I hope to God I die before they change any worse than this…”

Leo Frank’s lawyers argued to the jury of twelve white men that murder, rape, and robbery were “negro crimes” and thus Leo Frank, “a white man,” could not have committed the murder of Mary Phagan. One defense attorney said that “the murder was the unreasoning crime of a negro,” that “It isn’t a white man’s crime.”

Leo Frank’s own racist thinking is reflected in an Atlanta Constitution front-page headline on May 31, 1913: “Mary Phagan’s Murder Was Work of a Negro Declares Leo M. Frank.” The newspaper quoted Leo Frank:

Here is a negro [James Conley], not alone with the shiftless and lying habits of an element of his race, that is common to the South….No white man killed Mary Phagan. It’s a negro’s crime, through and through. No man with common sense would even suspect I did it.”

Leo Frank tried to pin his crime on two innocent black men

Leo Frank’s supporters then and now have played the race card and falsely represent an African-American man as the “real killer.” For over 100 years James “Jim” Conley has been scapegoated in nearly all the literature on the case. He was a sweeper in the factory on the day of the murder who was ordered by his boss Leo Frank to help move the dead body of Mary Phagan. When James Conley confessed to his accessory-after-the-fact role, Frank and his supporters tried to pin his crime on Conley. Leo Frank’s supporters continue to this day to smear James Conley as a devious criminal who got away with murder, but Conley’s very detailed statement—corroborated by the physical evidence at the crime scene — was so convincing that it became central to the prosecution’s case. (At trial, Leo Frank refused to be cross-examined by prosecutors, but James Conley withstood 16 hours of cross-examination—under oath.)

In 1914, Leo Frank supporters tried to hire a black woman named Annie Maude Carter to slip James Conley some poison while he was in jail waiting to testify at Frank’s hearing for a new trial. She identified the would-be assassins in open court as prominent members of the Jewish community. The plot was exposed in the May 6, 1914 edition of the New York Times.

Before he accused James Conley of the crime, Leo Frank worked overtime to pin the murder on another factory employee — the African-American night watchman who found Mary Phagan’s body, Newt Lee.Leo Frank hired private detectives who planted a blood-soaked shirt in the innocent black man’s home, and then Leo Frank’s attorney hinted to the police where they might find that damning “evidence.” When the newspapers reported that a bloody shirt was found at Newt Lee’s home, it almost caused an innocent man to be lynched. Luckily for Newt Lee, Leo Frank’s private detectives did such a sloppy job at planting the shirt that the police were not fooled at all, and it only increased their suspicion of Leo Frank. That is the point when the people of Atlanta came to believe—and rightly so—that Leo Frank was the murderer of Little Mary Phagan.

Alonzo Mann — the man that is supposed to have exonerated Frank in 1982 — would have CONVICTED him in 1913.

I, Mary Phagan-Kean, examined in detail the dubious claims of Alonzo Mann, who came forward in 1982 — after 69 years of silence — to say he saw Conley with the body of Mary Phagan. It turns out that his new statements hurt Leo Frank far more than they help him.

• Alonzo Mann (who died in 1985) was Frank’s “office boy” in 1913 and from the very start he gave many conflicting stories that are irreconcilable with the known facts: In May 1913 as a young teenager, Alonzo Mann told detectives 3 different stories in 3 separate interviews and gave yet another story in his sworn testimony at trial in August. In those interviews and in his trial testimony Alonzo Mann never mentioned seeing James Conley at all on the day of the murder. At age 83, in his 1982 videotaped session before the State Board of Pardons and Paroles, he gave still more conflicting versions that contradict the testimony of Leo Frank himself!

• What motivated Alonzo Mann to break his 69-year silence on the Leo Frank case by pinning the crime on James Conley? The answer was disclosed at the videotaped private hearing in 1982: behind Alonzo Mann’s obviously scripted, wavering “testimony” was a book and movie deal executed by the Tennessean newspaper—the same Tennessean that abandoned the truth and the facts of the case and any trace of journalistic ethics just to exonerate Leo Frank. So Alonzo Mann was induced to come forward for fame and fortune.

Alonzo Mann in 1913: Tells 4 different versions, and 2 more in 1982. The Phagan family was consulted by the Board in the run-up to the 1983 pardon decision, since the surviving members of the family had a great deal of personal knowledge of and documentation about the case and would be directly and profoundly affected by any decision. It was our Little Mary who had been strangled and very likely raped, after all. And the Board denied that pardon application.

The Jewish organizations tried again in 1986, but this time the Phagan family was not consulted. They were told about the upcoming pardon decision after the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith (ADL) and its well-heeled allies: Atlanta Jewish Federation and American Jewish Committee had been meeting with and lobbying the Board for six months or more. Why the secrecy? Obviously, the Jewish groups — led by Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith board member and attorney Dale Schwartz — didn’t want the victim’s family to have any say on the matter or any time to alert the public as to what was afoot.

Thus, in 1986 the Georgia Board of Pardons and Paroles issued a posthumous “pardon” to Leo Frank on the basis of the state’s failure to protect him while in custody, but it did not absolve him of the crime of murdering Mary Phagan and Frank’s conviction remained intact.

The state’s 1986 “pardon” did not overturn the guilty verdict

Believe it or not, there are still documents from the Leo Frank case that are being hidden from the public because they have been classified as “GEORGIA STATE SECRETS”! Our repeated attempts to obtain them from the Georgia State Board of Pardons and Paroles were denied again in December 2020. What could they be hiding? What could be so secret about a case that is 106 years old!? And why aren’t the media pursuing this extraordinary government action?

My book, The Murder of Little Mary Phagan is available free at: http://www.littlemaryphagan.com

Sources Banned and Censored

On the 100th Anniversary (April 26, 2013) of Mary Phagan’s rape and murder, the trial Brief of Evidence and appeals records of the Leo Frank case were digitized as well as the voluminous Atlanta newspaper reports about the crime.

These sources — and many, many more like them — use to be available on the internet until very recently. Indeed, the books, videos, articles, and court documents that provide a balanced view of the case have been systematical­ly removed from the internet SINCE THE Fulton County CONVICTION INTEGRITY UNIT WAS ANNOUNCED!

No Longer Available

  • Original articles from the three major dailies covering the day-by-day progress of the case (removed from archive.org)
  • Videos from YouTube that challenge the false idea that Leo Frank was “wrongly convicted.
  • Official case documents like the Brief of Evidence, the appeals filings, and the pub­lished trial records have been scrubbed from the internet.
  • Books that prove Leo Frank’s guilt and provide a serious case analysis have been banned and censored. My 1987 book titled The Murder of Little Mary Phagan has been removed from some websites where it was previ­ously available for years. The Nation of Islam’s recent book Leo Frank: The Lynching of a Guilty Man has been myste­riously banned from sale on Amazon.com.
  • Google searches EXCLUDE articles and documents that show evidence of Frank’s guilt.
  • When we made an Open Records Request to the Uni­versity of Georgia, they first said 70 records match the request. When we paid to have them mailed to us, all of a sudden, all 70 records vanished with no explanation!

Fortunately for the Fulton County Conviction Integrity Unit, the public and the media will still be able to ac­cess those critical official documents that the Leo Frank crusaders are trying to hide. We have made them available at LittleMaryPhagan.com where we believe they will be safe from the Leo Frank censors and their internet cleansing campaign.

Fulton County District Attorney, Paul Howard was defeated in the last election but the Conviction Integrity Unit he set up is still operating under the new District Attorney Fani Willis. Ms. Fani Willis might do well to ask why the original documents in the case all of a sud­den have been removed from the internet, and who had the power to remove them and why. How can the case be carefully reviewed without them? Indeed, the books, videos, articles, and court documents that provide a full and balanced view of the case have been systematical­ly removed SINCE THE CONVICTION INTEGRITY UNIT WAS ANNOUNCED!!! Obviously, Truth has become offensive or objectionable and has been deemed “hate speech” in order to impose censorship. But FACTS ARE NOT HATEFUL!

Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis inherited this corrupt process, but will she bow to the same pressure that was put on her former boss to exonerate a man who raped and murdered our family member?

As of today, no word from Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis on whether her office will finally give long overdue justice to the victim, Mary Phagan. Can we expect that she will stand by her own words?: “Cases won’t be for sale under my administration. Not for an endorsement, not for money, not for anything.” “You have my word, during my tenure as district attorney in Fulton County, we will become a beacon for justice and ethics in Georgia and across the nation.” “[D.A.] Willis vowed to bring ‘transparency and accountability’ to the DA’s office,” reported the Atlanta Journal and Constitution.

She would be the first to do so. We’ll see.

Notes

[1] Watch this video at 1:40 mark: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4tgKcqOXyhc

[2] See https://littlemaryphagan.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/FINAL-Barnes.pdf

[3] https://littlemaryphagan.com/the-murder-trial-testimony-brief-of-evidence/

[4] Atlanta Journal, May 5, 1914, 2. Atlanta Constitution May 6, 1914, 1, 5. New York Times, May 6, 1914, 3.

[5] https://littlemaryphagan.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/Steve-Oney-Says-No-New-Evidence-to-Exonerate-Leo-Frank-for-Murder-of-Little-Mary-Phagan.pdf

(Republished from The American Mercury by permission of author or representative)
 
• Category: History, Ideology • Tags: ADL, American Media, Anti-Semitism, Blacks, Jews 
Hide 218 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. Trinity says:

    A Jew talking about the Negro’s propensity for lying. Now that there is rich. You always read or hear about how rough Blacks had it during slavery but I would wager that poor White children like Mary Phagan slaving away in some pencil factory 12 or more hours a day at 12-13 years old worked harder than any Black slave in the cotton fields ever thought about working. And children and adult workers in the South made even less than their Northern counterparts in places like Chicago, Boston, etc.

    So Leo Frank was accused of sexual misconduct by 20 White women. And lest we forget that MOST of the men accused in those #MeToo cases the last few years have been Jews like Matt Lauer, Weinstein, Eric Schneiderman, among others. You have to wonder how many of these Hollywood Jews like Roman Polanski, Woody Allen and others were involved in this type of deal in the past. The list would probably be mind boggling. And lest we forget that some male child actors like Corey Feldman have claimed they were abused, so it isn’t just underage girls or women.

    Leo Frank? Yet another Jew who was guilty of raping a child or guilty of sexually molesting a woman or underage girl. COHENcidence? You decide.

  2. The “love” of Jews is a crime,and a sin.

    • Replies: @Stan d Mute
  3. What an anti-Semite. Away with her!

    • Replies: @anonymous
  4. Trinity says:

    IF Blacks only knew how Jews really feel about them? haha. Wasn’t it about 40% of all Jewish homes in the South owned slaves. My parents grew up in a small southwestern Georgia town and a Jew owned a local lumberyard there which employed a great deal of the working class poor, both Black and White, including some of my uncles. This greedy Jew paid next to nothing and worked the employees like dogs. This greedy Jew also owned a store there as well so the little money he dished out to these poor souls for toiling in his lumberyard went right back in his pocket when they bought groceries and other items from his store. We are talking the 1940s and 1950s in the Deep South long before Walmart, Costco, or even an A&P for small towns in the rural South.

    As for this Alonzo Mann character, what kind of scumbag at 80 something years of age LIES to obtain money and attention? Bad enough if some human turd pulls this off when they are young, but you might could excuse it due to having to worry about the future, paying bills, etc., but to lie about something as serious as a murder/rape when you have one foot in the grave and are about to meet your Maker shortly? Rewind it here, young or old, there is absolutely no excuse EVER to lie about a charge this serious. This Alonzo Mann was a real turd. Pretty sure this guy had some explaining to do in the afterlife so I hope his family or Mann enjoyed the money while it lasted because it sure isn’t doing him any good where he is at now.

  5. “THE JEWISH TALMUD IS ONE OF THE WONDERS OF THE WORLD”!
    The official unabridged Soncino Edition of the Talmud published in 1935 was “Translated into English with Notes, Glossary and Indices” by such eminent Talmudic scholars as Rabbi Dr. I. Epstein, Rabbi Dr. Samuel Daiches, Rabbi Dr. Israel W. Slotki, M.A., Litt.D., The Reverend Dr. A. Cohen, M.A.’, Ph.D., Maurice Simon, M.A., and the Very Reverend The Chief Rabbi Dr. J.H. Hertz wrote the “Foreword” for the Soncino Edition of the Talmud. The Very Reverend Rabbi Hertz was at the time the Chief Rabbi of England.

    The world’s leading authorities on the Talmud confirm that the official unabridged Soncino Edition of the Talmud translated into English follows the original texts with great exactness. It is almost a word-for-word translation of the original texts. In his famous classic “The History of the Talmud,” Michael Rodkinson, the leading authority on the Talmud, in collaboration with the celebrated Reverend Dr. Isaac M. Wise states:

    [MORE]

    “THE JEWISH TALMUD IS ONE OF THE WONDERS OF THE WORLD. During the twenty centuries of its existence…IT SURVIVED IN ITS ENTIRETY, and not only has the power of its foes FAILED TO DESTROY EVEN A SINGLE LINE, but it has not even been able materially to weaken its influence for any length of time.
    IT STILL DOMINATES THE MINDS OF A WHOLE PEOPLE, WHO VENERATE ITS CONTENTS AS DIVINE TRUTH…”

    The Talmud, then, is the written form of that which, in the time of Jesus, was called the Traditions of the Elders, and to which he makes frequent allusions.
    — Rabbi Michael L. Rodkinson (1)

    Or consider this from The Universal Jewish Encyclopedia, in the entry

    “PHARISEES”:

    The Jewish religion as it is today traces its descent, without a break, through all the centuries, from the Pharisees.
    Their leading ideas and methods found expression in a literature of enormous extent, of which a very great deal is still in existence. The Talmud is the largest and most important single member of that literature, and round it are gathered a number of Midrashim, partly legal (Halachic) and partly works of edification (Haggadic). This literature, in its oldest elements, goes back to a time before the beginning of the Common Era, and comes down into the Middle Ages. Through it all run the lines of thought which were first drawn by the Pharisees, and the study of it is essential for any real understanding of Pharisaism.
    — R. Travers Herford for the Universal Jewish Encyclopedia. (2)

    Rabbi Dr. Louis Finkelstein, Instructor of Talmud, and later president of the Jewish Theological Seminary of America, writes:

    Pharisaism became Talmudism, Talmudism became Medieval Rabbinism, and Medieval Rabbinism became Modern Rabbinism. But throughout these changes of name, inevitable adaptation of custom, and adjustment of Law, the spirit of the ancient Pharisee survives unaltered. When the Jew reads his prayers, he is reciting formulae prepared by pre-Maccabean scholars; when he dons the cloak prescribed for the Day of Atonement and Passover Eve, he is wearing the festival garment of ancient Jerusalem; when he studies the Talmud, he is actually repeating the arguments used in the Palestinian academies.
    — Rabbi Dr. Finkelstein (3)

    SANHEDRIN, 55b-55a: “What is meant by this? – Rab said: Pederasty with a child below nine years of age is not deemed as pederasty with a child above that. Samuel said: Pederasty with a child below three years is not treated as with a child above that (2) What is the basis of their dispute? – Rab maintains that only he who is able to engage in sexual intercourse, may, as the passive subject of pederasty throw guilt (upon the actual offender); whilst he who is unable to engage in sexual intercourse cannot be a passive subject of pederasty (in that respect) (3). But Samuel maintains: Scriptures writes, (And thou shalt not lie with mankind) as with the lyings of a woman (4). It has been taught in accordance with Rab: Pederasty at the age of nine years and a day; (55a) (he) who commits bestiality, whether naturally or unnaturally: or a woman who causes herself to be bestiality abused, whether naturally or unnaturally, is liable to punishment (5).”
    This “divine truth” which “a whole people venerate” of which “not a single letter of it is missing” and today “is flourishing to such a degree as cannot be found in its history” is illustrated by the additional verbatim quotations which follow:

    SANHEDRIN, 69b “Our rabbis taught: If a woman sported lewdly with her young son (a minor), and he committed the first stage of cohabitation with her, -Beth Shammai says, he thereby renders her unfit for the priesthood (1). Beth Hillel declares her fit…All agree that the connection of a boy nine years and a day is a real connection; whilst that of one less than eight years is not (2); their dispute refers only to one who is eight years old.

    KETHUBOTH, 11a-11b. “Rabba said, It means (5) this: When a grown up man has intercourse with a little girl it is nothing, for when the girl is less than this (6), it is as if one puts the finger in the eye (7), but when a small boy has intercourse with a grown up woman, he makes her as `a girl who is injured by a piece of wood’ “.
    (footnotes) “(5). Lit., `says’. (6) Lit., `here’, that is, less than three years old. (7) Tears come to the eyes again and again, so does virginity come back to the little girl under three years.”

    KETHUBOTH, 11a-11b. “Rab Judah said that Rab said: A small boy who has intercourse with a grown up woman makes her (as though she were ) injured by a piece of wood (1). Although the intercourse of a small boy is not regarded as a sexual act, nevertheless the woman is injured by it as by a piece of wood(a dildo).”
    (footnotes) “(1) Although the intercourse of a small boy is not regarded as a sexual act, nevertheless the woman is injured by it as by a piece of wood.”
    ABODAH ZARAH, 36b-37a. “R. Naham b. Isaac said: They decreed in connection with a heathen child that it would cause defilement by seminal emission (2) so that an Israelite child should not become accustomed to commit pederasty with it…From what age does a heathen child cause defilement by seminal emission? From the age of nine years and one day. (37a) for inasmuch as he is then capable of the sexual act he likewise defiles by emission. Rabina said: It is therefore to be concluded that a heathen girl (communicates defilement) from the age of three years and one day, for inasmuch as she is then capable of the sexual act she likewise defiles by a flux.

    SOTAH, 26b. “R. Papa said: It excludes an animal, because there is not adultery in connection with an animal (4). Raba of Parazika (5) asked R. Ashi, Whence is the statement which the Rabbis made that there is no adultery in connection with an animal? Because it is written, Thou shalt not bring the hire of a harlot or the wages of a dog etc.; (6) and it has been taught: The hire of a dog (7) and the wages of a harlot (8) are permissible, as it is said, Even both of these (9) – the two (specified texts are abominations) but not four (10)…As lying with mankind. (12) But, said Raba, it excludes the case where he warned her against contact of the bodies (13). Abaye said to him, That is merely an obscene act (and not adultery), and did the All-Merciful prohibit (a wife to her husband) for an obscene act?”

    SANHEDRIN, 55b: “A maiden three years and a day may be acquired in marriage by coition, and if her deceased husband’s brother cohabits with her, she becomes his. The penalty of adultery may be incurred through her; (if a niddah) she defiles him who has connection with her, so that he in turn defiles that upon which he lies, as a garment which has lain upon (a person afflicted with gonorrhea).”
    (footnotes) “(2) His wife derives no pleasure from this, and hence there is no cleaving. (3) A variant reading of this passage is: Is there anything permitted to a Jew which is forbidden to a heathen. Unnatural connection is permitted to a Jew. (4) By taking the two in conjunction, the latter as illustrating the former, we learn that the guilt of violating the injunction `to his wife but not to his neighbor’s wife’ is incurred only for natural but not for unnatural intercourse.”

    Of the “sacred” Talmudic teachings of the “Sages,” preserved since 500 A.D. and taught more widely today than ever before in Talmud-Torah schools in the U.S.A., perhaps nothing better illustrates “fools” with “reprobate minds” than the teaching in the Talmud book of Yebamoth that spittle on the top of the bed curtain proves that a wife has been guilty of adultery, as only lying down face upwards could she have spit up on it. Spitting several feet straight up!

    • Replies: @Tony Hall
    , @Per/Norway
  6. @Trinity

    THE DOGMA THAT THE BLACK IS A SLAVE BY NATURE IS RABBINIC IN ORIGIN

    Canaan is identified as a black man and blacks as in inferior people, only in the Gemara, which is to say the latter part of the Talmud, the Midrash and later writings of the rabbis. This invective, this racism, is not anywhere in the bible concerning the black race.

    [MORE]

    The rabbinic account of the malediction against Ham stipulates that his son Canaan, and all Canaan’s offspring, are to fated to suffer perpetual slavery and black skin without the chance of their condition being ameliorated. It is this Rabbinic gloss that influenced those fifteenth century Renaissance humanists who had crossed over into the forbidden territory of the Talmud, the Midrash and the Kabbalah as part of a supposedly enlightened act. It is an irony of history that as a result of this supposedly progressive development, the abominable view of blacks as a perpetual race of slaves became entrenched among the western liberal intelligentsia for at least the next three hundred years.

    MOSES MAIMONIDES
    The Encyclopedia of the Jewish Religion refers to Moses Maimonides as “THE SYMBOL OF THE PURE AND ORTHODOX FAITH.”
    The book GUIDE TO THE PERPLEXED is considered the greatest work of Jewish religious philosophy:

    “[T]he Negroes found in the remote South, and those who resemble them from among them that are with us in these climes. The status of those is like that of irrational ANIMALS. To my mind THEY DO NOT HAVE THE RANK OF MEN, but have among the beings a rank lower than the rank of man BUT HIGHER THAN THE RANK OF APES. For they have the external shape and lineaments of a man and a faculty of discernment that IS SUPERIOR TO THAT OF APES.”

    “Those who are incapable of attaining to supreme religious values include the BLACK coloured people and those who resemble them in their climates. Their nature is like the MUTE ANIMALS. Their level among existing things is below that of a man and above that of a monkey.”

    (Maimonides, Guide To The Perplexed, Translation from the Hebrew Version)

    • Replies: @anon
  7. Bartolo says:

    I congratulate Mary Phagan-Kean for being such a staunch defender of the truth after so many decades, and for having the immense courage to stand up to vicious and racist organisation whose business is to lie. Respect!

  8. UNIT472 says:

    Seems like Frank was quite the sexual predator and like many men who sexually assault children the fear of being found out left him no choice but to kill her. She was disposable and he probably thought his legal ‘Dream Team’ could pin the crime on the negro janitor.

    For this scheming and refusal to face up to his guilt I am glad he was pulled from his cell and lynched- in Mary Phagan’s hometown of Marietta. Thing is I doubt he would have lasted long in prison anyway. Child rapists were likely just as unpopular amongst convicts in 1915 as they are today!

  9. If anybody’s interested in keeping score, four of the eight members of the Conviction Integrity Unit are Tribe (Lebow, Schwartz, Schuster, Pearlberg), all with a documented past interest in exonerating the accused. The two females are both blacks who owe their judicial careers to toeing the Tribal line (i.e., not being independent-minded “wrong-thinkers” of the Cynthia McKinney variety). Old Roy is a failed one-term governor, the first Democrat to lose that office in Georgia since Reconstruction, largely due to his role in removing the Confederate battle emblem from the state flag, a noble sacrifice for which he has been lionized by the ADL, just like his long-ago predecessor Slaton. So that’s at least 7-1 in favor of exoneration.

    • Thanks: Stan d Mute, John Q Duped
  10. Thomasina says:

    Why is this exoneration so important to the ADL? Even with all the evidence and witness testimony, they seem incapable of accepting the fact that a member of their Tribe could ever do anything wrong. They just keep pushing and pushing, lobbying and stacking committees until they get their way.

    Who appointed the members of this Conviction Integrity Unit? Sounds like a lynching of the justice system to me.

    And who has been scrubbing and censoring information off the Internet? Another lynching, this time of information.

    A sweet little girl was murdered over a hundred years ago, and yet to the ADL she is not important. Leo Frank is.

    Thank you for the good article. I hope your family stays strong and continues fighting for the truth.

  11. Trinity says:

    jews are indeed the ORIGINAL DINDU NUFFINS. Blacks have nothing on the j people when it comes to lying and sexual misconduct. And some things NEVER change as I mentioned earlier about all the jewish males named in the #MeToo movement.

    Timing? Well with even normies getting wise to the jews, maybe that is why a century old murder/rape case is being brought up AGAIN. Epstein, Weinstein, and Schneiderman, sounds like a damn law firm. haha. Pretty soon the criminal thugs over at the ADL will condemn accusing jewish males of raping White Gentile females an act of antisemitism that is punishable by up to 5 years in prison and/or a 25 thousand dollar fine. Think I am kidding? These freaks really think like that. The old Polish proverb about the jew crying out in pain as he strikes you is spot on. These sociopath, psychotic, perverts are demonic and sick as hell. jews and Blacks WANT to have laws criminalizing anyone who accuses jews and/or Blacks of crimes and making it illegal to not only arrest jews and Blacks, but even to suggest one of these special people are guilty of any wrongdoing. Bad thing is you have White Gentiles who adore the jew and Negro so much they are cowardly enough or stupid enough to worship these POS and grant them immunity against any criticism much less being arrested for a crime they committed.

    • Agree: anarchyst
  12. @Thomasina

    ‘Why is this exoneration so important to the ADL? Even with all the evidence and witness testimony, they seem incapable of accepting the fact that a member of their Tribe could ever do anything wrong. They just keep pushing and pushing, lobbying and stacking committees until they get their way…’

    It is an exasperating trait. Jews actually weaken their position with this absurd insistence on their absolute, lily-white, invariable innocence. So Leo Frank was probably guilty. So what?

    The Jewish community never should have involved itself in the case in the first place, and now here they are, more than a hundred years later — digging themselves in deeper.

    • Replies: @Robert Dolan
    , @JimDandy
  13. JimDandy says:

    Even in this age of the totally-retarded #metoo and #racialreckoning, the truly-heroic Phagans don’t stand a chance. Next up: redeeming the legacies of Leopold and Loeb, and cancelling Hitchcock’s Rope.

  14. Mehen says:

    One down.

    5,999,999 “burnt offerings” to go.

  15. Angharad says:
    @Thomasina

    You’ve answered your own question in your post. Jews always blame others for the loathing and emnity they incurr. It’s always the Other Goy’s fault. JEWS REFUSE TO ACCEPT A SHRED OF RESPONSIBILITY FOR THEIR CRIMES. For their monstrous treatment of Humanity. They won’t ever even acknowledge the harm and ruin they’ve caused others, and this is what they’ve done for centuries.

    • Agree: HdC, Nancy
  16. @Thomasina

    It is important as a symbol of Jewish inviolability, their total impunity from any judgment by any goy for any crime. Like Israel that defaecates on International Humanitarian Law to the TOTAL indifference of every Western MSM presstitute, or political scum-bag.

  17. @Bartolo

    I feel sorry for this woman and what her family has had to endure. The Jews will stop at nothing to control every aspect of society and remove anything that gets in their way whether they are documents or people. There is a reason Jews are so hated for thousands of years for this type of behavior. They will continue trying to rig the system and I wish this woman success in fighting the Criminal Empire of the Jews.

    • Replies: @DaveE
  18. @Trinity

    I’ll have you know Woody Allen is a New York jew!

    How ya like them apples of god’s eye? 😉

  19. Tony Hall says:
    @Philip Power

    Good history lesson on an important subject. Thanks Philip Power.

    • Replies: @BDS Always
  20. Ghali says:

    Jews will win. America is ruled by paedophile and sex maniac Jews. The only way out is for Americans to muster the courage and rise up against Jews.

    • Replies: @sally
  21. frankie p says:

    Mary Phagan-Kean and the rest of the Phagan clan must continue to stand tall and reject this ridiculous attempt to change a guilty verdict against a predator from over 100 years ago. We salute you and we stand with you. Who would or could be surprised that Organized Jewry in the form of the ADL and other groups would attempt to rewrite history based on a narrative created out of thin air and supported by dishonest goys greased by Jewish money. It’s the Holocaust all over again, a propaganda program that MUST succeed. Actually, the red-pilled and black-pilled should be shining a light on this silly game that they’re playing, and we should be comparing THIS travesty (the innocence of Leo Frank, brought to you by Organized Jewry) with THAT travesty (the 6 million, also brought to you by the unhinged, ethnocentric tribe).

    When you hear about this in mixed company, give a hearty laugh and say with a smile: “You people want to rewrite every piece of history, really too rich! You know what I’m talking about!” Then smile!

    • Thanks: Joe Levantine
  22. Dumbo says:

    Leo was an evil POS and he got a well-deserved lynching. End of story. That a hundred years later some Jewish organizations are trying to turn him into an innocent dindu kosher is really bizarre and speak of their own evil intent. Look, there are German, Italian, Spanish, Japanese serial killers or perverts. This doesn’t reflect on their nation at all. Most people accept that there are a few rotten apples in every nation’s cart. But these Jewish organizations can’t accept that, they see “anti-semitism” everywhere, and appear bent on defending their worst people. Will they defend Maddoff and Epstein too? Well, some gangsters and traitor spies got a hero’s welcoming in Israel, so you never know.

    But what reflects badly on Jewish people is not that they have a few murderers or perverts or gangsters, all nations might have that — is that their organizations defend those evil pieces of shit.

    • Agree: ivan, Garliv, Colin Wright
    • Replies: @dimples
  23. If a black guy wanted to rape and strangle a young girl he would not do that in his boss’s factory. He would have ample opportunities to do that in a secured area of his neighbourhood. My opinion is the man who committed the heinous crime paid for it with his life; which is not payment enough.

  24. Dumbo says:

    Another possibility, of course, is that the lynching was faked, and that Leo Frank was actually removed from prison to be taken to a safe location with his rich peers, a la Epstein. That appears to be what some such as Mathis imply. Who knows. In any case, to defend such an unpopular and ugly character is a stupid and evil idea.

    • Thanks: Peripatetic Itch
  25. @Gaspar DeLaFunk

    The “love” of Jews is a crime,and a sin.

    It is unless you are a Jew. Which makes it so disturbing to me that so many, most actually, of my fellow Northern European descended peers claim to so fervently worship the JewGod. JewGod fanatics (of exactly the same type we see today smashing Confederate statues and planting BLM signs in their yards and demanding that CRT be taught to your children) back then smashed the statues of OUR gods. They purloined our traditions, our holidays, and for the most part our values (they did instruct us to spread the other cheek).

    That so many of us are incapable of noticing this, only due to the early childhood indoctrination that we all received, is incredibly important to notice in itself. This is how it’s done. They’re doing it right now to YOUR kids just like in a whiter era you were indoctrinated with the JewGod narrative of your era.

    And then there are those who can see but have taken the gold or who have been “compromised”..

    It’s depressing as hell to have clear vision.

    • Troll: Nancy
    • Replies: @ivan
  26. I note that the author points out the philosemitism of the community at the time. Then as now. The negro has always been the visible irritant committing crime and being a highly visible minority. The Jewish malefactor, like the white psychopath or sociopath, blends into the background when he chooses. The evangelical JewGod worshippers were probably donating money to Frank’s B’nai B’rith before, during, and after the trial so crucial to them is the Jewish mythology and mysticism. When you literally get on your knees and pray to the Jewish Messiah, it’s hard to argue that you are anything but philosemitic even if you do think they ought to be “saved.”

    Nothing has changed in the century has it?

    What’s telling and important for at least some people to notice, is that there are globally powerful Jewish lobbying groups working a century later to erase just this one Jew’s crimes. Have they done this before? Tried to erase Jewish crimes from History? Were they successful? And what motivates them to try to scrub history and fabricate the lie? What other fabrication might they have foisted on us?

    • Agree: Peripatetic Itch
    • Replies: @Badger Down
    , @Nancy
  27. @Trinity

    IF Blacks only knew how Jews really feel about them? haha.

    As this site’s resident Detriot ghetto honkie (and thus unfortunately all too familiar with what the “typical” negro thinks), let me say that the reverse is a far more common and prevalent sentiment. The typical negro sees the Jew as “super honkie” – that is to say that everything he hates about us regular whites is turbocharged for the Jew (and increasingly the Oriental).

    There are some number of Jews who idealize the negro. Some (I’ve known them) believe that there are negro Jews and that they belong in Zion. This isn’t reciprocal.

  28. Sarah says:
    @Thomasina

    Thank you for the good article. I hope your family stays strong and continues fighting for the truth.

    What could I add ? Nothing more, just repeating the same :

    Thank you for the good article. I hope your family stays strong and continues fighting for the truth👌🤗

  29. @Thomasina

    Whatever reason the ADL want it reversed, won’t make them any more likable I bet.

    I’ll warrant any motive will be for something equal to or worse than child rape and murder. I have personal knowledge of a Rabbi in the ADL, which experience only adds fuel to the fire.

  30. Great article, Mary. Thanks!

    Why are the Jews forever on the attack? The Jewish Onslaught by these fake Semites, fake victims, eternal aggressors, is becoming more and more widely known.

  31. anon[100] • Disclaimer says:

    The take away for Christians in this case is the small hats will make the most bald faced lies about anything. Their ability to change quotes should be a warning to all of us, that the small hats have zero regard for the truth.

    The Leo Frank case is a perfect way to introduce the naive to how the small hats operate.

  32. ivan says:
    @Stan d Mute

    The JewGod – Jesus Christ, had Himself warned about Jews like Leo Frank. So there.

    • Replies: @John Q Duped
    , @Stan d Mute
  33. Garliv says:

    What really is the REAL REASON ADL & Jewish groups seek to have 100 years old conviction overturned? Is it to in defence of prominent Jew Leo Frank? Am unable to think of a rational and overriding reason why expend time, resources and underhand schemes to have Leo Frank pardoned when overwhelming evidence condemned him over 100yrs ago.
    Pride of the tribe, maybe?

  34. I grew up in Marietta and had never heard of Mary Phagan or Leo Frank until a Jewish kid whose parents recently moved to town started talking about the case and taking kids (teens) to Mary Phagan’s grave at night. Prior to that, I had unknowingly passed by the cemetery and the site of Frank’s lynching countless times without knowing. Unless it was some deep, dark secret that the elderly talked about in private (which I seriously doubt) Leo Frank was not an issue in town, and neither was anti-semitism.

    The last time I went home, the local theater company was putting on a play about the framing of Leo Frank, and the lynch-site is now some sort of local landmark.

    I’ve read transcripts from the trial in the past, and I think it is obvious that Frank was guilty. His wife’s refusal to be buried by his side is pretty damning, also.

    It really is puzzling that the Jewish community is still so obsessed with clearing Leo Frank that the campaign has lasted over 100 years and the Frank supportes are willing to lie, slander, and bribe the whole time to clear Frank’s name. That is sick, and we are all lucky that the Phagan family is around to tell the truth.

    Anyone familiar with Georgia politics knows that Roy Barnes is dishonest and no friend of Georgians. Like Slaton before him, Barnes is willing to put himself, his personal integrity, and the interests of Georgians in the hands of outside interests. Having Roy Barnes on your side doesn’t speak to the integrity or justness of your case.

    • Replies: @Garliv
    , @fnn
  35. Jiminy says:

    This, along with the holocaust, should never be forgotten nor forgiven. Whether one life is taken or six million, they all count. And the negro Judas, no doubt paid well to stand by and watch a fellow black, innocent, be accused. When looking up Howard’s name and background I see that he has some history as well.

  36. Fulton County District Attorney Paul Howard (with former Governor Roy Barnes) announces “Conviction Integrity Unit” to re-open Leo Frank case. Atlanta Journal-Constitution, May 7, 2019. Once again, most advocates and so-called experts who determine Leo Frank is not guilty have relied on blatantly false information and politically biased propaganda. Frank’s conviction was upheld by thirteen separate courts and judges in his thirteen appeals from Fulton County to the United States Supreme Court. Every court affirmed the trial was fair and the jury was not “mob terrorized.

    What’s more, driven by the need to exonerate a Jewish leader, they intend to convict an innocent African American man, James Conley — Frank’s employee that he ordered to help move the body. They ignore the 20 young girls and women who testified under oath that Frank sexually harassed them at the factory. Frank’s attorneys refused to cross-examine ANY of them, and later admitted that they were all telling the truth.”

    Paul Howard, showing the world what a good ‘house nigger‘ he is and certified ‘shabbos goy

    Leo Franks was clearly guilty of the rape and murder of Mary Phagan, but you see, this just goes to show three things about the jew:

    1. They WILL NOT be taken to any court and tried by a goy.
    2. They steal from, rob, rape and murder any goy with impunity.
    3. That they have complete control over the US and its majority goy population.

    What do all the above clearly prove? They prove that the only supremacism, at play in the USA (and throughout the west) is jewish. This case should never have been revisited, let alone contemplated.

    It’s interesting that this article should appear when I was doing research on the new Rothschild movie by Mel Gibson and finding clear condemnation of his ‘anti Semitism’ from the jew media. They castigated and pilloried him for his ‘Passion of the Christ’ correctly detailing the Pharisees’ murder of Christ and techincally the exoneration of Leo Franks, is no different.

    In the society, controlled by the jew, he/she can do whatever they wish to the goy, because it’s permitted in their talmud. The good news is that cases, such as Leo Franks and his exoneration, continue showing the world precisely there’s only one kind of supremacism in this world.

    • Agree: Kolya Krassotkin
  37. KLP48 says:

    I’m so glad they at least lynched that disgusting kike after. Back when Americans had some balls.

  38. Anonymous[661] • Disclaimer says:

    Good article, and bless Mary Phagan-Kean for her strenuous effort to protect the truth.

    • Agree: Arthur MacBride
  39. @Thomasina

    A sweet little girl was murdered over a hundred years ago, and yet to the ADL she is not important. Leo Frank is.

    THAT is really a very minor and insignificant example. To murrika, the other Asians are not important. The Japs are!

    In 1945-46, representatives of the United States government made similar discoveries in both Germany and Japan, unearthing evidence of unethical experiments on human beings that could be viewed as war crimes. The outcomes in the two defeated nations, however, were strikingly different. In Germany, the U.S., influenced by the Canadian physician John Thompson, played a key role in bringing Nazi physicians to trial and publicizing their misdeeds. In Japan, the U.S. played an equally key role in concealing information about the biological warfare experiments and securing immunity from prosecution for the perpetrators. The greater force of appeals to national security and wartime exigency help to explain these different outcomes.

    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4487829/

    • Replies: @HdC
  40. @Garliv

    “What really is the REAL REASON ADL & Jewish groups seek to have 100 years old conviction overturned?”

    I think it’s because, they’re trying to promote that Leo Franks was found not guilty and that his subsequent lynching, immediately upon leaving the court room, was wrong, even though he should have been found guilty and publicly hanged thereafter. I also believe as well that they want to promote that no jew, should ever be tried by any goyim, regardless of his crime, as promoted in their talmud.

    The jew has complete control over the goyim, courtesy of their control of the entertainment industry, along with the msm, politics and academia. They have managed to complete indoctrinate the goyim into protecting their slave masters at all costs and to see all jews as exempt from prosecution. They’re essentially creating a two class society – jews and non jews with the former having complete authority over the latter to do with as they please. The teaching of Critical Race Theory (CRT) now in schools and colleges, is a blatant example of this, that is the denigration of the majority into second class citizens in their own civilization. It shows the immense control that they are not only teaching this, but getting away with it. If anyone attempted to reverse the CRT teaching back on the jews and teach of the perfidy of jewry, they’d end up arrested for hate speech. They’re proving that the law is what the jews say the law is. They’re also proving Ezra Pound correct when he said:

    “The answer to the Jewish problem is simple. Keep them out of banking, out of education, out of government.”

    He forgot to mention the media and entertainment, two other institutions vital to the subversion of the western civilization by the jew.

    • Thanks: Garliv, Katrinka, DaveE
  41. From Jesus to William of Norwich to Leo Frank, the jews have a pathological desire to absolve themselves of any guilt.

    • Agree: Colin Wright
    • Replies: @Colin Wright
  42. Garliv says:
    @OilcanFloyd

    “….. until a Jewish kid whose parents recently moved to town started talking about the case and taking kids (teens) to Mary Phagan’s grave at night.”

    Just curious, why would a Jewish kid be taking other kids to Mary Phagan’s grave? And at night! Weird…

    • Replies: @OilcanFloyd
  43. geokat62 says:
    @Trinity

    Wasn’t it about 40% of all Jewish homes in the South owned slaves.

    According to the work of two prominent Jewish demographers, Ira Rosenwaike and Lee Soltow, 75% of Jewish households owned slaves in the 1830s, compared to 36% of white households.

  44. and thus Leo Frank, “a white man,” could not have committed the murder of Mary Phagan. Of course , now the jew is a “GOY”…blending in for all eternity. By the way, judging by most of the comments , Uncle Adolf was right. Herr Göring , https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WjbsD-TYi3s I love how the conversation starts… “A RAT catcher catching rats”… How prescient of the Jew to state such a thing. He knows what his people are.

  45. Irwin says:

    Putting Jack the Ripper in charge of investigating all the murders he has committed…

    https://www.brighteon.com/61cd465e-5963-4444-baeb-476ab9a75c46

    • Replies: @EoinW
  46. The more they probe the more Jewish pedophile and homicidal maniacs will be unearthed. When you’ve been granted unconditional impunity and allowed to escape the justice system, the more diversified and egregious your crimes, with predatory sex thrown into the mix.

  47. anonymous[402] • Disclaimer says:
    @Irish Savant

    I’ve worked with them in the Big Bagel, and I’m sure it’s the same elsewhere where their numbers are toxic, so you get used to the many subtle looks implying the anti-Semitic canard. “I know you’re only disagreeing with me because I’m Jewish” look. Or, “I see you’re staring at my big nose and hate me because I’m a Jew” look. In politics this is apparently subconsciously conveyed to uncritical naifs in a look or phrase that gets votes by implying, “Won’t you elect even one poor Jew this year”? For non-New Yorkers’ general edification, no non-Jewish New Yorkers put up with their shit face to face, at least no one I’ve ever known, which speaks volumes about the lickspittles the Jews place on our ballots like McConnell and McCarthy.

    They do this locally in the towns their presence ruins, at least in every one I’ve lived in. I saw it in Chappaqua, NY, before moving to Connecticut to get away from them and the inevitable high taxes they bring in their wake. They’re able to turn the best family towns into hellish images of the Democratic Party because once they’ve moved in and moved on from the library committee and school board they run for elected office, always with the subtle implication that any opposition to them is anti-Semitism. “I know the only reason you don’t like me is because I’m a poor Jew” look. So, the well-meaning townspeople cave in because, after all, “We can’t have that here, now can we”?

    Every major thing that’s wrong with this country can be traced to the Jews, not by my say-so, but according to the ADL and SPLC by implication of their hate lists denouncing bedrock America, such as “white patriots,” Ron Paul supporters, pro-life organizations, and especially America’s vets. You know, the white soldiers dying in the ME so good Jewish boys need not be bothered–like the former’s grandfather’s generation who, while the Jews stayed home as draft dodgers, died during WW II in the pathetic and tragic belief they were helping to save Europe’s Jews. The Jews’ ingratitude toward this country that gave them everything, including so many lives of its best young men, is stupefying in it’s psychotic hatred and matched only by the cowardice of those who serve them in Congress, the deep state, and local politics.

  48. This was a very strange case. Everyone involved in the case with the exception of Frank and a few others was at least a twelfth cousin. While that is a very distant relation and people have millions of twelfth cousins, mathematically the odds are very heavily against everyone involved being that closely related are very high. Twelfth cousin is obviously not a relation that will put people in personal contact. But a few were as close as second or third cousins, which can be, especially the former. EP Dobbs, future Georgia Senate President and lyncher of Frank, was third cousin of Lemmie Quinn, one of the defense witnesses of Frank. Albert Guthman, a grand juror who voted to indict Frank, was openly a Jew and was second cousin of two of the defense attorneys of Frank, Herbert Haas and Leonard Haas.
    I believe that there is at least reasonable doubt as to the guilt of Frank, though Jim Conley is not a plausible suspect. There was another suspect arrested by police who is more plausible in my view, James Gantt. He was reported by John Phillips, a hotel manager, to have attempted to register a room with Mary the night before, he and Mary knew each other well personally, and he had openly shown sexual and romantic interest in Mary. Frank did not know Mary well personally, even if he was lying when he claimed not to know who she was, Gantt did know her well personally. Usually in sex murders like this the victim and the murderer know each other personally.
    Paul Bowen was another suspect arrested by police. He was arrested in Houston, Texas when a woman heard him talking to himself, ranting that he regretted an evil he had done. His only alibi came from family and friends. He had lots of photographs of Mary Phagan and letters that police thought might be from her to him. Paul Bowen was 3x great grandson of Captain Mordecai Abraham, who was openly a Jew. So if Bowen was involved with her killing it would support my suspicion that Frank was the fall guy for other Jews in this.
    There is much more that I could say but it would make my comment too long to say more.

    • Replies: @EoinW
  49. I know absolutely nothing about this case. I had never even heard of Leo Frank before seeing the above headline on the Unz homepage. After reading this article I went and read other articles about this murder. None of them, including this article, persuades me about the guilt of Frank one way or another, but what struck me was the tone of the Wikipedia article, which seemed determined to pin the blame on James Conley, which it all but accuses of the murder. This is in striking contrast to, for instance, the Wikipedia article on Jack the Ripper, which doesn’t try to pin the Whitechapel prostitute murders on any particular person. Since Wikipedia is, as everyone knows, a fount of truth that would never, ever, lie, I can only conjecture that in 2021 blaming a Jewish person for a crime, even if there is evidence indicating that he is guilty, is “anti Semitism”. Trying and condemning, by keyboard, a black man who isn’t alive to defend himself is preferable to that.

  50. As evidenced for all to see: killing, raping, dismembering and drinking the blood of a white, non-Jewish girl is not considered a crime to Jews. This is what they are saying. Wake up people.

  51. JessicaR says:

    A few thoughts:

    1. Some of the inconsistencies in Frank’s statements that supposedly indicate guilt reflect nothing more than the fact that memory is fallible. At one point, Frank said he didn’t go to a parade because it looked like rain. At another time, he said he had work to do. Well, lots of people have multiple motives for actions. At the time, maybe he thought, “It looks like rain and I have work to do, so why don’t I stay in the office.” Later, he remembers one reason. And still later, the second reason. This is not lying. It is fallibility.

    2. The same argument applies when he says he was in his office and a woman said he wasn’t. He said he may have used the bathroom. I don’t remember every time I use the bathroom. I suspect that most people don’t.

    3. Frank should never have been put on trial. The key witness, Conley, changed his testimony FOUR times. In addition, he was a chronic alcoholic. Addicts and alcoholics are not reputable witnesses because alcohol depletes B vitamins, which leads to brain damage, which leads to “confabulation,” or making up things that never happened.

    4. The murder notes were not only in Conley’s handwriting, they also had Conley’s speech patterns.

    5. The fact that Frank and his lawyers resorted to gutter racism at a time when it was, alas, very common, is evidence of desperation, not guilt. Yes, the racism makes them look bad, but lawyers then and now use every tactic they can to sway jurors.

    6. While I don’t think this article mentions it, some police reports commented on Frank’s nervousness. Well, maybe he was just a nervous guy. Maybe he had hyperthyroidism, which made him thin, made his eyes bulge, and made him appear nervous.

    7. Alcoholics and other addicts are skilled liars. Conley could easily have sounded convincing to police and jurors and still be lying his head off.

    BUT:

    1. Frank was a sexual harasser, as the article says. Many writers tend to discount this testimony by saying the women were either manipulated into lying or , implicitly, that they were so trashy they didn’t count. When there are that many women coming forward, I am inclined to give credence to their claims.

    2. Conley had a criminal record but his crimes were stupid things like barroom brawls. His criminal record did NOT include sex crimes.

    3. None of the women in the factory reported sexual harassment by Conley.

    4. It seems odd in the extreme that IF an African-American man had murdered a 13-year-old white girl that he would have stayed there to write TWO notes. The factory was all but empty. He could have fled. Why take the chance that someone –a night watchman, a foreman, a supervisor–would have come in and caught him with the body. Plus, Jim was an alcoholic. If robbery was a motive, he probably would have taken her pay and gone to the nearest bar.

    5. I can envision Frank threatening and bribing Conley. ” Here’ s money for whiskey. Breathe a word and I’ll say you did it. You know what lynchings are like.”

  52. @Garliv

    It is strange. There are places and graves around town that are supposedly haunted that local kids visited, but that wasn’t one of them.

    The Jewish kid was friends with my older sister’s boyfriend and took them to the grave and told them about Mary Phagan being murdered. I don’t know that he put a slant on the case, but it is weird that an outsider would have introduced Mary Phagan and Leo Frank to local kids and taken them to the grave at night. I remember my sister and her friends talking about how weird it was.

    • Replies: @Angharad
  53. dimples says:
    @Dumbo

    They won’t defend Madoff. He burned a lot of fellow Jews, the ultimate crime.

  54. Ron Unz says:
    @JessicaR

    There’s actually quite a lot of additional information, very strongly pointing towards Frank as the likely culprit. Here’s a link to an article I published a couple of years ago on exactly this topic:

    https://www.unz.com/runz/american-pravda-the-adl-in-american-society/#the-leo-frank-case-and-the-creation-of-the-adl

    • Thanks: Orville H. Larson, Trinity
    • Replies: @Paul Bustion
  55. And the ADL continues to wage open ethnic-race war against The NATIVE BORN WHITE CHRISTIAN AMERICAN WORKING CLASS HISTORIC MAJORITY in 2021….

    The ADL wants our People fucking dead dead dead dead dead dead…

    1913

    1965

    1967

    Nov 3 2020(The ADLs nonwhite post-1965 pets nullified the Native White Working Class Vote)

    • Replies: @dindunuffins
  56. @Ron Unz

    There is at least reasonable doubt as to the guilt of Frank though. I believe that he should not have been convicted or lynched because of reasonable doubt. And there are suspicious circumstances in the case, the ones I mentioned in my previous comment. Given this, I think that we should not certainly conclude that Frank was guilty.

    • Replies: @Ron Unz
    , @Colin Wright
  57. DanFromCT says:
    @Fiendly Neighbourhood Terrorist

    I can only conjecture that in 2021 blaming a Jewish person for a crime, even if there is evidence indicating that he is guilty, is “anti Semitism”.

    In 2021, saying that Israel or Jews are even so much as capable of doing something wrong is “anti-Semitism.” Just ask any Republican member of Congress, he’ll gladly tell you so once his office receives his talking points back from the ADL.

  58. Z-man says:

    What a tragedy that continues for the Phagan family. It’s the power of the Jew that keeps this story from ending. God speed to the Phagan’s and their defense of TRUTH.
    Ay least the snake was lynched soon after his death sentence was commuted.

  59. Is there a legal fund for Mary Phagan-Kean that we can donate to?

    There needs to be some kind of chink in the armor of the ADL. (Besides the ongoing publication of TUR.)
    It is way past time for them to receive some kind of public humiliation, even a small one.

  60. @Fiendly Neighbourhood Terrorist

    When I see those ads by Wikipedia begging for money I laugh.

    • Agree: JMcG
  61. HdC says:
    @Deep Thought

    From what I read, any such experiments were performed with convicted prisoners who were promised their freedom if they survived the experiments.

    This is contrary to to the USA were medical experiment were conducted without the consent or knowledge of the subjects involved.

    The victors write the (lying) history books.

  62. Ron Unz says:
    @Paul Bustion

    There is at least reasonable doubt as to the guilt of Frank though.

    Not really. Everyone involved in the case agreed that the killer was either Frank or that black employee of his. If it had to be one or the other, the evidence suggests a 99% chance that Frank was guilty.

    The theory proposed by the pro-Frank side is that the local police and judicial officials deliberately fabricated evidence to frame Frank, a wealthy local white businessman, so that they could allow a black rapist and murderer to go free in the community and presumably attack other white women and girls. If you believe this happened in the Old South a hundred years ago, you’re beyond rationality.

  63. aj54 says:
    @Thomasina

    The Talmud does not consider these acts against Gentiles to be crimes, and in fact excuses all manner of acts of abuse of the goyim. They are not even considered to be human.

  64. aj54 says:
    @Ron Unz

    If they actually thought one of the black men had committed the crime they would have lynched them immediately

    • Agree: Garliv
    • Replies: @Hamlet's Ghost
  65. @Ron Unz

    ‘Everyone involved in the case agreed that the killer was either Frank or that black employee of his. ‘
    There were many people arrested on suspicion of her murder besides Frank and Conley. Paul Bowen, James Gantt, Arthur Mullinax, Newt Lee and Gordon Bailey.
    James Gantt knew Mary Phagan well personally and multiple witnesses said that they saw Gantt and Mary together the night before her murder and a hotel manager, John Phillips, reported that Gantt and Mary had tried to rent a hotel room the night before.
    Edgar Sentell, a friend of Mary’s, reported seeing her with Arthur Mullinax shortly before her murder.
    During the murder trial the defense attorneys of Frank decided to fixate on Jim Conley as the alternative suspect, but before the murder trial police had been focused initially on James Gantt as the most likely alternative suspect, not on Conley. Frank had also suggested Gantt as a likely suspect.
    Gantt showed up the same day Mary did, with the bizarre excuse of recovering a lost pair of shoes when he had been fired by Frank almost a month before and had been living in another state for almost a month.
    Police also in the beginning suspected the involvement of a white slavery ring.
    It is not accurate to say that everyone involved in debating who murdered her throughout thought that it must be Frank or Conley. During the trial that was the position the two sides took, but it was not the position the police took initially.

    • Replies: @Bombercommand
    , @notbe
  66. @Ron Unz

    ‘The theory proposed by the pro-Frank side is that the local police and judicial officials deliberately fabricated evidence to frame Frank, a wealthy local white businessman, so that they could allow a black rapist and murderer to go free in the community and presumably attack other white women and girls. If you believe this happened in the Old South a hundred years ago, you’re beyond rationality.’
    I do NOT believe that Conley was the murderer either. I think that Mary was sexually attacked and murdered by a Jew or Jews, and that they made Frank their scapegoat. All the White alternative suspects I mentioned were of Jewish ancestry. For example, Paul Bowen was the 3x great grandson of Mordecai Abraham, who was openly a Jew.
    Another point to make is that one of the alternative suspects, Bowen, clearly had mental problems. He was arrested because he was seen by a woman ranting to himself. Frank was a sexual predator against young females. But he was an otherwise normal person. A person with mental problems is more likely to commit weird sex murders than a normal person, other things equal. And other things are equal because Bowen had a bizarre collection of photographs of young females that police saw when they arrested him and letters from these young females, so it seems that Bowen was a sexual predator as well.

  67. Thank you, Mary Phagan-Kean, for your honourable stand for justice.

    From what I read your elected “representatives” can learn a lesson from you.

    How are these obviously worthless drones in power at every level in USA ?

    • Agree: Trinity
  68. The fix is in, honey! No matter how much you yell from the top of your lungs, the Jew has upper hand so long as the goyim act like paid harlots. Mary Phagan, RIP!!!

  69. @Paul Bustion

    “a wealthy local “white” businessman” Once again…the smallhat is White…hmmmmm…and blacks were and are known to CONSTANTLY and CONSISTENTLY rape and murder White Women…black men and White Women are the highest instances of INTERRACIAL violence . And along with the article I posted about black men and black women…which is 100% factual to all the lib and black morons because Huffpost wrote it, https://www.huffpost.com/entry/black-women-domestic-violence-delashon-jefferson_n_5c128145e4b0449012f7a511 End of story / Of course Conley did not rape or murder this particular White girl,the smallhat did…but then again maybe THEY BOTH DID…maybe ,since the smallhats and the bootlipps hate Whitey, they pulled a train on Mary…and the smallhat Leo used the bootlipp to frame , though he joined in , more people would go after the bootlipp instead of the smallhat since smallhat and the media were saying he is a SUCCESSFUL WHITE MAN… bada bing bada boom…..anyways maybe I’ll wrote a book about this ,everyone else gets to write what they think even when it’s wrong,so why can’t I. I might be right on for all anyone knows. And maybe I’ll get Spielberg to make a movie. Smallhat and Bootlipp, along the lines of Thunderbolt and Lightfoot. But rape and murder instead of robbery.

  70. Thomasina says:

    If Jews can exonerate Leo Frank, they will then be able to say:

    “JEWS WERE LYNCHED WRONGLY TOO! Just like Blacks were wrongly lynched. Jews and Blacks were wrongly lynched by White Supremacists. Jews and Blacks are victims.

    Whites are evil.”

    Jews will then be a member of the “wrongfully lynched” crowd. They MUST be seen as VICTIMS, never perpetrators.

    Then they will erect a new Leo Frank statue right in the center of Marietta to remind everyone of the evil, racist Whites. Newspaper articles will be written yearly on the anniversary of Leo Frank’s death. Maybe a museum gets built, right next to one of the Holocaust museums.

    Spielberg makes a new movie, just to hammer home the point that Jews were victims again. Wikipedia’s entry is cemented in stone, never to be changed again. History is rewritten.

    Do you see it playing out this way?

  71. @HdC

    The entire Jap nation are the convicted prisoners because they set out to conquer and to enslave the peoples of East and Southeast Asia! Yet they failed:

    Benjamin111 Haoin reply to Benjamin111 HaoAug 22nd 2015, 02:11
    I personally believe Chiang & Mao sacrificed the Chinese lives for their own selfish motives.

    Not at all. It takes a great leader to inspire his people to make so huge a sacrifice to defend their nation’s honour. The fact that Mao and Chiang did that– and in a China which was so backward at the time and also immersed in disunity– is the proof of their greatness.

    On the other hand, militarist Japan set out to conquer and to enslave the entire Asia. It failed. According to Samurai honour code those responsible, from the Japanese emperor downwards to the bottom foot-soldiers, should have committed Seppuku to redeem themselves.(http://asianhistory.about.com/od/asianhistoryfaqs/f/seppukufaq.htm). Many lower ranking Japanese soldiers did exactly that when they failed in their missions. That is the ONLY honourable way out allowed by the Samurai honour code.

    The Japanese emperor and other top-rank Japanese war criminals– in fact, the entire Japanese nation– however chose the easy way out. They either waited to be tried as war criminals or WORSE– They shamelessly chose to live under the protection of their conqueror, who became their White Emperor: http://www.pacificwar.org.au/JapWarCrimes/USWarCrime_Coverup.html

    By NOT committing Seppuku, the Japanese emperor and other top-rank Japanese officials– as well as the entire Japanese nation– had totally, utterly and shamelessly dishonoured the “Master Yamato Race” and desecrated the Yamato-Damashii (大和魂, “Japanese spirit”) (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yamato-damashii)!!! The current Japanese nation is the product of such shameless betrayal and desecration. It is therefore spiritually corrupt, dirty and worthless ;-D, ;-D, ;-D

    Devil’s

    • Disagree: thotmonger
  72. Liza says:

    “Little” Mary Phagan, a hundred times over wherever I read about this case. She was not 3 years old. Is this an attempt to manipulate, or not. If it is, what a poor job. Just say, “Mary Phagan” and give us the facts of the case.

    • Troll: Stan d Mute
  73. sally says:
    @Ghali

    The best way, IMO, to defeat the hegemonic position of wealth and the discrimination it produces, is to force the enforcement of the bill of rights amendment to the U S Constitution.. The 5th and 14th amendment .. particularly. and to push hard to elect to congress <=only persons <=who sign an oath <=armed with teeth <=sufficient to warrant <=that the candidates, if elected <= will implement Article VII of the US constitution to attempt to amend the constitution so that normal citizens can propose amendments and the citizens of the entire nation can vote on whether or not to ratify the proposed changes to the national constitution.

    Then and only then can we the citizens fix things. After that, a second new amendment should make a budget that campaigns can spend and reinstate the must carry Media coverage of candidate time on media, every candidacy should be made equal, so no person, backed by wealthy persons or corporations or rules of media, can denied all candidate the same privilege of running for office in equal circumstances. .

    The problem is no citizen in the nation, who is not also a voting member of the electoral college can vote for the President or the Vice President. That needs to be changed,.

    Every voter should be able to caste one vote for the President and a 2nd different vote for the VP.

    Every voter in every voting district, should be able to caste one vote for each any candidate running for each seat in Congress and for the office of P and VP.

    As things stand today: we ordinary citizens have but three votes, 2 for the candidate Senator for our home state, and 1 from the candidate member of the House of Representative running from our district. and none; zero votes; allowed to voters, for the candidate running for P or VP.
    My Opinion.

    • Replies: @Nancy
  74. ‘If Jews can exonerate Leo Frank, they will then be able to say:

    “JEWS WERE LYNCHED WRONGLY TOO! Just like Blacks were wrongly lynched. Jews and Blacks were wrongly lynched by White Supremacists. Jews and Blacks are victims.’

    They will not succeed if it can be proven that Jews were behind the campaign against and lynching of Frank.

    The prosecuting attorney in the murder trial of Frank, Hugh Dorsey, appears to have been of Jewish ancestry. There are Jewish names throughout his genealogy, for example his paternal granddad was named Solomon. Hugh Dorsey is a distant relative of Twitter Chief Executive Officer Jack Dorsey, who is likely of Jewish ancestry. Hugh Dorsey was a Freemason and Freemasonry tends to be associated with Jews. All the alternative White suspects were of Jewish ancestry, I believe, based on Jewish names throughout their genealogy. One of them, Paul Bowen, as I said before, is proven to be of Jewish ancestry.
    The men who lynched Frank were later regathered together by William Simmons to found the second Ku Klux Klan. The Ku Klux Klan tends to be associated with Freemasonry, Simmons was a Freemason and Simmons was of Jewish ancestry. Those things would tend to suggest that if Frank was innocent, then the people behind the campaign against him were Jews.

  75. He tries to dispose of the body – Fail
    His Jewish Lawyers claim the no-good Nigger did it – Fail.
    His Jewish Lawyers plant evidence to frame the no-good nigger – Fail.
    His Jewish Lawyers then try to murder the witness via poisoning his food – Fail.
    His Jewish Lawyers then in a last desperate attempt – install a witness to feign an Anti-Semitic confrontation – Fail.
    Now, 2021, his Jewish Tribe seeks to erase all evidence of this incredibly fair trial and paint it as Anti-Semitic.

    These fucking people have no shame. NONE!!! Absolutely NONE. Most Christians would be in fear of their immortal soul for taking part in such a horseshit. But not the Jew.

    This story reminds me of the countless supposed Holocaust Victims who toured the United States spewing their lies, being invited on Oprah, fleecing their audiences, wallowing in their sympathy and goodwill…. only to be exposed. And even after being exposed as complete Frauds, they are absolutely unapologetic.

    Ellie Weisel – A complete Fraud
    Anne Frank’s Diary – Her father published it. The original ghostwriter sued Ann Frank’s Father and won. Much of the diary was added to using a ballpoint pen; a device invented after WWII.

    And yet both Anne Franks Diary and Ellie Weisel’s “Night” are required reading in most high schools across America.

  76. Tony Hall says:

    Wikipedia on Leo Frank. Verdict: Frank was “wrongly convicted.”

    Leo Max Frank (April 17, 1884 – August 17, 1915) was an American factory superintendent who was convicted in 1913 of the murder of a 13-year-old employee, Mary Phagan, in Atlanta, Georgia. His trial, conviction, and appeals attracted national attention. His lynching two years later, in response to the commutation of his death sentence, became the focus of social, regional, political, and racial concerns, particularly regarding antisemitism. Today, the consensus of researchers is that Frank was wrongly convicted and Jim Conley was likely the actual murderer.

    Apparently the Zionists engineering the content of Wikipedia don’t have to wait around for the rigged report of the Fulton County No Integrity Unit.

    • Agree: Z-man
    • Replies: @CelestiaQuesta
  77. @Colin Wright

    You are pointing out the absurdity of hyper-ethnocentrism…..jews (and blacks and most ethnic groups) will circle the wagons to defend even their most odious criminal.

    Look at George Floyd….or Jonathan Pollard.

    Whites are unique in that we honor the rule of law, reputation, truth, and decency…..we will happily throw white criminals under the bus.

    Of course, whites have been totally deracinated by one hundred years of jewish propaganda.

  78. anarchyst says:
    @Thomasina

    Sounds like “holocaust 2.0 ™” is in the works since the “original” “holocaust™” is losing steam as more and more people recognize the “original” for the fraud that it is…

  79. DICARLO says:

    The author’s complaint about the removal of information about the trial on internet sites, reminded me of the fact that, over the past one hundred years, even in the case of our public libraries, what rank and file Whites don’t know, and in fact, couldn’t even conceive is the fact that jews, individually, and collectively, have physically stolen most of our best books, written by Whites, or any book that exposed the jew agenda. Jews have hoarded them away from those seeking the truth or destroyed them. Today, most libraries are so jew-influenced now that they do not even try to stock the best White books and other materials. They are full of jew-written, jew-sourced books, with most of those jews pretending to be White authors. This is why jews are all over the internet, censoring, gate-keeping, and smearing Whites as nativists, racists, and anti-semites, desperately trying to stop the exposition of truth.

    In the case of science, the infiltration of jews within the ranks of, and during all presidential administrations have shut off funding for work that could benefit our White race. Jews control all the choke points in government. Also, the jews have stolen and twisted/killed valuable White theories and findings. And the jew-controlled publishing industry simply buries or shuns manuscripts valuable to us.

    Finally, most people get their information about books and scientific findings only from jew-owned media, such as TV, newspapers, and big websites including yahoo, facebook, google, the sites of big newspapers and magazines, and the likes of huffingtonpost, etc. The best output of our White race never gets mentioned. In the rare case when they feel it necessary to mention something that could be useful to us, the jews demonize it so that Whites who are still duped will not even try to find and read such things.

  80. The cruel and sinister rape and murder of Lil’ Mary Phagan hits home for me. I was working at 11 doing paper routes, mowing lawns with a hand mower and whatever else I could to survive. Losing my alcoholic father at five while my mother exposed her six kids to the hellholes of ghetto hoodrats.
    I developed a very strong work ethic that guided my will to never live in inner city shitholes again.
    I can only guess at the amount of whites who have, and are now being abused by our Jewish/Magic Negro overlords.
    The evidence is everywhere, Hollywood Global Homo, Shekelberg News Networks, Big All of them, local, state and federal government, ad nausea.
    We are not only witnessing crimes of humanity, we have become the victims by a (((justice system))) gone rogue.

    • Agree: Sick of Orcs
  81. (Roy Barnes) said that “there were just mobs of people. And as the jury would go [to] the courthouse every day, the mob would scream, “Hang the Jew or we’ll hang you!”

    Sure wish this guy Barnes had been made aware of the Derek Chauvin trial mobs. From Pretendsident bidumb and up, it was nonstop (((media))) propaganda, refusing to move the trial location, letting slip to jurors the city cucked and paid off the floyd criminals, and one juror (black) who boasted about lying to get on the jury.

  82. Ron Unz says:
    @Paul Bustion

    The prosecuting attorney in the murder trial of Frank, Hugh Dorsey, appears to have been of Jewish ancestry. There are Jewish names throughout his genealogy, for example his paternal granddad was named Solomon. Hugh Dorsey is a distant relative of Twitter Chief Executive Officer Jack Dorsey, who is likely of Jewish ancestry. Hugh Dorsey was a Freemason and Freemasonry tends to be associated with Jews. All the alternative White suspects were of Jewish ancestry, I believe, based on Jewish names throughout their genealogy. One of them, Paul Bowen, as I said before, is proven to be of Jewish ancestry.

    Some of your claims were so bizarre, I looked around a bit and apparently your likely source is a notorious disinfo operator.

    One obvious strategy for discrediting the “conspiracy theory” that Frank was actually guilty is adding a vast number of totally false and even crazy details to the theory, which may then be casually absorbed and spread by ignorant gullible readers. This is sometimes called the “Cass Sunstein” strategy. I therefore suggest all readers should be on their guard against this.

    • Thanks: Robjil, Bubba
  83. As I read through the article, my thoughts turned to the Palestinian children that are routinely murdered and then, on occasion, there is a hearing in an Israeli court where the murderer is exonerated like clockwork. This is their value system… we are superior supremacist beings (fake khazar talmudic jews) and have the right to decimate and devalue all other human life as if they were animals. Over the course of the past century, they have imparted that belief system both in Israel, western Europe and the good ole USA. They use their endless resources (funny how they already were so powerful in Atlanta in 1913 even though “the holocaust” was on the way… guess they had advanced warning and got out with their gold intact so as to not be part of the “six million”) and control of information to bring their form of justice to America. If the mentioned prominent Jews at the time were so offended why did they proceed to support this murderer with all their might and resources????We ‘mericans Are their colony and they Are our overlords! Only Christ can destroy the seed of satan and He will.

  84. @Liza

    “Little” Mary Phagan, a hundred times over wherever I read about this case. She was not 3 years old. Is this an attempt to manipulate, or not. If it is, what a poor job. Just say, “Mary Phagan” and give us the facts of the case.

    The facts and verdict were given over 100 years ago, but some people refuse to accept them. Little Mary Phagan is far more accurate than Poor Leo Frank.

    • Replies: @SolontoCroesus
  85. @Liza

    Oh like what…when all i see is some black ghetto rapist murdering degenerate POS referred to as “he was a goot boy” “he was turning his life around” “he DINDNUFFINS” “Leroy was a pillar of the coonmunity, he never hurt no onez”…like a Trayvon Martin…picture splashed everywhere in the media like he was a little Mary Phagen…pictures of that scumbag ghetto trash loser when he was in middle school probably raping other “little” White Mary Phagans. Learn to STFU!

    • Replies: @Liza
  86. Anonymous[172] • Disclaimer says:

    I for one am glad Mary Phagan is dead. Otherwise it would be some sort of creepy Monkey’s Paw situation.

    • Replies: @Badger Down
  87. @DICARLO

    Yes same thing that was used against Napoleon France ” NAPOLEON famously lamented that “the Jews are like locusts and they eat my France!”

    Bolshevik Russia and then Germany…funny that.

  88. @Tony Hall

    Who needs rule of law or courts when the Sheckleberg Press and its academia indoctrination centers will have determined the outcome for you.

  89. @DICARLO

    Thanks DICARLO

    jews, individually, and collectively, have physically stolen most of our best books, written by Whites, or any book that exposed the jew agenda. Jews have hoarded them away from those seeking the truth or destroyed them. Today, most libraries are so jew-influenced now that they do not even try to stock the best White books and other materials. They are full of jew-written, jew-sourced books, with most of those jews pretending to be White authors.

    and

    the jew-controlled publishing industry simply buries or shuns manuscripts valuable to us.

    Absolutely AGREE with respect to Jewish dominance of library collections and policies, and also with Jewish dominance of publishing, including highly-lucrative and influential fiction publishing.

    Jews are four-square behind Drag Queen story hours in libraries;
    A Jew, diagnosed as schizophrenic, influenced the ALA to incorporate ALA endorsement of gay literature (and follow-on affirmation of the LGBTQ agenda) into library policy nationwide. I suspect that was not something Andrew Carnegie had in mind.

    I’m convinced no fiction writer can hope to be published much less make Best Seller status unless there is some reference to the evil-ness of Nazis, the innocence and goodness of Jews who are usually the “good guy” — i.e. Singer, the most sympathetic & long-suffering character in The Heart is a Lonely Hunter — is eventually identified as Jewish; Carson McCullars originally intended him to be Jewish ____ Horowitz, in South that was very heavily Judeo-philic when “Hunter” was published (German Jews flocked to the South to buy up land on the cheap shortly after a. Indians were removed, then again, b. during Reconstruction. Used to be a few books on that phenomenon, but I don’t see them anymore.)

    • Replies: @DanFromCT
  90. NAPOLEON famously lamented that “the Jews are like locusts and they eat my France!”

    Brave last words.

    This man of battle once tried to solve the Jewish Question and got hoodwinked by the rabbis.

    [MORE]

    Earlier, in 1799, Napoleon dreamed of marching into Jerusalem in the name of provoking prophecy.

    It was not the last time that “End Time” theology clouded a White man’s vision of the Jews.

    But once he was Emperor, this man of battle sought to put an end to the Jews as a separate race.

    He failed miserably.

    What he did was convene in Paris Jews from all over Europe and put to them questions which would leave them no escape from the light of history.

    Are Jews a nation within a nation? Or are they French?

    Do Jews consider Frenchman “strangers”? Or as brothers?

    Did Jews regard France as their native country? Or were they separate?

    Do Jews obey French laws or their own laws?

    Do Jewish moneylenders make a distinction between Jews and Christians?

    Good questions all.

    And as Emperor of France, he demanded answers. The prominent Jews so gathered fell all over themselves to say that Jews were French, no different from any other Frenchman in all of those particulars.

    Thus they ostensibly cancelled the Talmud, and cancelled Israel as a nation.

    That is, they lied through their teeth.

    In the full light of history.

    For a Jew is always a sophist, and they proceed only by misdirection.

    Lying is integral to their religion.

    But as it fell out they were taken at their word.

    And this famous and majestic Napoleonic interrogation formed the basis for all European countries to “emancipate” their Jews.

    That is, Jews were given all civil rights and were allowed into the professions.

    They could become doctors, lawyers, journalists, politicians.

    They could be Englishmen, Germans, Frenchman.

    No different from any other in law.

    But, of course, underneath it all they were always only Jews.

    Once a Jew always a Jew, as the saying goes.

    But this foolish emancipation unleashed a wave of Jews to the forefront of the White world.

    Soon they were operating at the highest levels in all fields in Europe and soon in America as well.

    In Spain of the Middle Ages, Jews would profess to be Christians.

    Now they professed to be French.

    Same lie, and the same gullibility to believe it.

    Karl Marx, of Jewish ancestry himself, said that once the Jews were emancipated in a society, that society soon became Jewish.

    This is true, just as black ink in pure water soon makes that water black.

    Goethe warned his contemporaries that, were the Jews ever to be emancipated, they would not spare us.

    He was right. Napoleon got snookered.

    And now the Jews are like locusts, swarming, preying.

    And eating our nations.

    • Replies: @InnerCynic
  91. Thim says:

    Frank was certainly guilty. As for the jogger Conley, all this talk of him being innocent is unconvincing. It doesn’t ring true. But it was convenient for the prosecutors to paint Conley as an innocent, I understand that. Probably he had a long history of assisting Frank in his rapes and lesser crimes.

  92. Garliv says:
    @DICARLO

    …. what rank and file Whites don’t know, and in fact, couldn’t even conceive is the fact that jews, individually, and collectively, have physically stolen most of our best books, written by Whites, or any book that exposed the jew agenda. Jews have hoarded them away from those seeking the truth or destroyed them.

    This is incredible. What’s beyond incredible is that they get away with it without even a whimper. How did America get to such a point!!

    • Replies: @geokat62
  93. @Fiendly Neighbourhood Terrorist

    Even if, hypothetically, Frank didn’t rape and kill anybody, it’s still pretty despicable that so much time and money has been spent to exonerate someone who got rich from the hard labor of little girls.

    Wikipedia devotes an entire section to the ‘context of the time’ that paints Atlanta as being ‘unequipped to deal with urban problems’ — basically saying that the backwards white folk had some trouble adjusting to the new reality of degrading industrial servitude for women and children, less than 50 years after the city was burned to the ground and then occupied by predatory opportunists.

    Gotta think that if this was a white businessman running a factory in a third-world country that the US had recently conquered, the guy would have been made a poster child for the leftist narrative of rapacious exploitation of the local abject poor population. And he would have been tried and convicted mercilessly in the court of public opinion for the rest of history, with popular contempt for anyone who even suggests that he may have been innocent of the crime.

    • Agree: Lancelot_Link
  94. Chris Moore says: • Website

    All ((Jews)) care about is the ((Jewish)) supremacist narrative. Any historical black eye for the crime syndicate? They’ll come back and rewrite it later, and the dumb goy will accept it as truth.

    Objective truth? Logic? Reason? They mean nothing to the ((Jews)). All that matters to them is maintaining their “chosen” illusion. This pathology permeates every cell of their being.

    That’s why they don’t belong. That’s why they’ve always been “persecuted.” And that’s why they have no place in the West; dare I say, no place on the planet, if human society is to operate and live by reason, and to survive.

    If the corrupted West chooses to play by megalomaniacs Jewish rules (and continued demands for “tolerance” for the Jewish rackets suggest it intends to) then the West as we know it is done. The world as we know it is done.

    Maybe that’s what these fanatical psychopaths want: All or Nothing. All or Oblivion.

    I vote they get Oblivion — but only the top ((Jews)) (the keepers and main beneficiaries of the criminal racket) and their corrupt, murderous and/or criminally degenerate sociopath and psychopath accomplices.

  95. EoinW says:
    @Irwin

    It’s lucky they never caught Jack the Ripper. Today’s western justice system would exonerate him!

  96. @HdC

    As often happens, Deep Thought’s link (#39) to the NIH library article ( United States Responses to Japanese Wartime Inhuman Experimentation after World War II ) about prosecuting German physicians on grounds of “war crimes,” versus absence of prosecution of Japanese physicians for “war crimes” led me down a rabbit warren.

    Some interesting observations:

    [MORE]

    1. The only noted allegations against Germans involved “aeronautical stress-research.” The article did not mention German use of “biological warfare” research.

    1a. As expanded upon below, it appears that the source for much of the information about German physicians comes from Paul Weindling (a co-author of the NIH paper), and emphasizes the “racist and eugenic” attitude underlying German practice.

    1b. Weindling’s 2015 book “identified approximately 25,000 victims of German experiments, with confirming documentation for around 10,000. Only about five percent of experiments ended with the death of the subjects.”

    2. Canadian physician John Thompson is acclaimed as the spark plug behind the Nuremberg Doctors Trials and thereby the “Nuremberg” code. His “qualifications” are that he was at Harvard with a proven liar — Andrew Ivy, who in 1940 conducted malaria experiments on prisoners then lied about their not having given consent; and Jewish, Austria-born Leo Alexander, who was trained in psychiatry at Frankfurt U. and later was “a leading proponent” of electric-shock therapy and insulin shock therapy. Alexander was an eugenicist.

    Thompson is the guy behind the Nuremberg Code that those of us who question enforcement of vaccination rely upon with the claim, Informed Consent!!

    3. Although Japanese physicians were not tried at Nuremberg or anywhere else, their “war crimes” experiments were investigated and research documents and results acquired by United States personnel, most of whom were linked to the US biological labs at Fort Detrick, MD.

    3a. Conspiracy theorists might be tempted to theorize that US got some of it bioweaponry knowledge from Japanese physicians-researchers-war criminals from WWII.

    ___________________

    What does this NIH paper have to do with ADL’s latest attempt to exonerate Leo Frank?

    I assess that it indicates a pattern of behavior: over 75 years after-the-fact, Jews are still demonizing Germany to deflect attention to the malign actions of Jews, and to sustain in the public the false impression of Jews as perpetually-innocent perpetual victims.

    In Psych 101 terms, the NIH paper, and the ADL-invoked “Integrity Unity” are intended to reinforce the notion in the minds of the demos that Jews are to be pitied and admired but never held to account.
    ___________________

    Authors of the NIH article
    wrote that

    “We first briefly summarize the experiments in the two countries,
    then describe Thompson’s activities in postwar Germany.
    We next recount the U.S. investigations of Japanese biological warfare experiments.”

    “Brief summary” of “experiments in Germany” consists of reference to the works of Canadian physician John Thompson, at whose insistence the Nuremberg Trials of German physicians were prosecuted; and Paul Weindling, one of the co-authors of this paper.

    The closest the referenced NIH article gets to “summarizing” the “experiments in Germany” are these passages:

    “He was a skilled enough psychiatrist to assess German war crimes defendants for underlying psychopathology. “

    and

    He had studied high-altitude flying, fitting him to evaluate German wartime research in that area. Finally, he had worked at Harvard during the 1930s with physiologists Andrew Ivy***[see Green Report] and Leo Alexander, who became central figures in the Nuremberg Doctors’ Trial.12,13

    When he arrived in Germany in May, 1945, Thompson’s first experience involved the care of the survivors of the Bergen-Belsen concentration camp. Even after liberation, deaths mounted alarmingly from malnutrition, a typhus epidemic, and inadequate medical response.

    Thompson was then assigned the task of assessing the results of German aeronautical-stress research. He quickly discerned that much of this research was conducted in an unethical manner, as was confirmed by interviews with both German scientists and surviving subjects.

    Weindling was born in England in 1953; his mother arrived in England in a Kindertransport at age 17 in 1939, the same year his father was “one of forty Austrians to be allowed to study dental surgery in Britain” (wikipedia). Young Weindling has, apparently, made a career of bashing Germans4: in 2015, Paul Weindling published Victims and survivors of nazi human experiments : science and suffering in the holocaust, whose central emphasis is on “German racial hygiene” and eugenics.

    ***Green Report: “The [Green] report justified testing malaria vaccines on Statesville Prison, Joliet, Illinois prisoners in the 1940s. Ivy mentioned the report in the 1946 Nuremberg Medical Trial for Nazi war criminals. He used it to refute any similarity between human experimentation in the United States and the Nazis. . . . ”

    The thrust of the Green Report was that test subjects had given consent, but this was not true:

    “Ivy misled the trial about the report, in order to strengthen the prosecution case. Ivy stated that the committee had debated and issued the report, when the committee had not met at that time. It was only formed when Ivy departed for Nuremberg after he requested then Illinois Governor Dwight Green to convene a group that would advise on ethical considerations concerning medical experimentation. An account stated that he wrote the report on his own after he cited its existence in the trial. It was later published in the Journal of American Medical Association (JAMA).”

    That is, Ivy lied.

    Alexander was also a piece of work — see above.

    These two, Ivy-the-liar and Alexander-an-eugenecist, were John Thompson’s mentors (or handlers?).

  97. EoinW says:
    @Paul Bustion

    You need to explain more than motive(speculative sexual desire?). How could Gantt, Bowen or anyone else commit the crime?

    1) she was murdered on the 2nd floor work room, next to Frank’s office? How could anyone get up there and murder the girl without Frank knowing?

    2) The body was then transported to the basement. Once again, how is that done without Frank being aware of it?

    3) Frank refused to give Phagan’s paycheque to a friend Friday. Meaning Frank knew she’d be coming to get it Saturday. How would anyone else know she’d be dropping by work for a moment to pick it up? Even if someone knew, there is no opportunity to commit a murder.

    There is no other murder suspect. The only alternative to Frank is Conley and the evidence overwhelmingly indicated Frank did it.

    • Replies: @Paul Bustion
  98. EoinW says:
    @JessicaR

    Ron Unz featured this crime a few years ago with an excellent article. Most importantly, it pointed out the definitive work on this case; the Nation of Islam book “The Leo Frank Case – The Lynching of a Guilty Man”

    Search for that online if you want access to ALL the information on this case.

  99. @Paul Bustion

    You are forgetting, or more likely choosing to ignore, that Mary Phagan was murdered inside the pencil factory, on a day when the only persons in the factory were Frank and Conely. Mary had gone to pickup her pay before going to a public event where she was to meet friends, but she never arrived. She had to go to Frank’s office to get her pay packet, therefore she would have gone directly to Frank’s office without detour or delay. It is a certainty that Frank had intimate contact with Mary Phagan in his office, and Mary never left the building alive. The conclusion is obvious, Leo Frank murdered Mary Phagan.

    • Replies: @Paul Bustion
  100. @OilcanFloyd

    Little Mary Phagan is far more accurate than Poor Leo Frank.

    IMO Young [not Little] Mary Phagan is far more compelling than phony Anne Frank.

    • Replies: @OilcanFloyd
  101. @ivan

    That is if Jesus really was Jewish. And if Jesus was Jewish then God the Father has to be Jewish also. Imagine that but too bizarre to believe.

    • Replies: @General Koofta
  102. This is another great article exposing the two sided justice system that for over a hundred years protects the image of one race in order to feed its banker barons coiffeurs.
    Why did we allow Jews to use a hoax hate crime (((Holocaust))) and black slavery to become the defining standard by which whites are now profiled as slave owning anti Semitic white Nazi Supremacists .

    I refuse to use Google or Wikipedia for serious fact checking, they have completely rewritten historical facts, planting seeds of hate against the white human race.

    It’s now seven billion of them against one billion of us, with white numbers dwindling downward with each passing minute. When you deduct a few hundred million woke Magic negro worshiping, Judaeo/Christian messiah cults, opioid braindead and brainwashed, your looking at around a couple hundred million at most to hold the line. And with each vetting process, you’ll be lucky to have a few million defenders for the last whites to inhibit earth and the outer cosmos.

  103. Corrupt says:

    How strange that everyone on the “Conviction Integrity Unit” (with the possible exception of the former governor) is a jew. What are the odds?

    • LOL: InnerCynic
    • Replies: @Orville H. Larson
  104. DanFromCT says:
    @Insouciant

    My old town has a private library association, and although the town has almost no Jews it pays the librarians’ salaries and mysteriously, somehow, the past two head librarians have been Jews. On the many “new arrival” tables around the place, you can’t help but notice that probably four out of five of the new books the library buys are written by a Jew.

  105. TheJester says:

    There always seems to be a reason why Jews do what Jews do. This is anticipation; this is a cultural picadillo that never disappoints.

    In this case, Jews clamoring to exonerate Leo Frank 100-years after the fact establishes the precedent that goyim will and always have gone to extraordinary lengths to frame an innocent Jew for raping and murdering a 13-year old white girl. Indeed, they will even exonerate the guilt of a vile Black man who obviously killed the girl to get at the Jew.

    In this, the ADL is perhaps trying to baseline different levels of goyim prejudice … a wall of obfuscation behind which Jews can hide regardless of the vileness of their schemes and crimes.

    Consider the reasoning: Whites hate Blacks as already established by Critical Race Theory. Therefore, everything that Blacks do that is suspect must be interpreted and excused through the lens of that prejudice. Even worse than that, whites hate Jews with an even more virile prejudice … as evidenced by the Leo Frank frame up and lynching. Therefore, whenever a Jew is at risk for anything, attribute it to antisemitism in extremis on the part of goyim society. Remember the Holocaust when Jews were allegedly massacred across Western and Eastern Europe for no apparent reason at all!

    Jews, as the developing narrative goes, have a historical experience of victimhood at the hands of goyim that exceeds anything and everything done to Blacks, including slavery, segregation, systemic racism, and lynchings. As with the Jewish-created narrative for Black victimhood, any fault found with Jews should be exonerated with the same prima facia assumption of white prejudice … or racism or whatever you call it.

    Hence, if you notice what Blacks do, you “be racist”. If you notice what Jews do, you “be antisemitic”. End of the story … end of the discussion!

    The above suggests a hidden agenda behind the recent Jewish-sponsored and funded Critical Race Theory, BLM, demands for reparations, and the “defund the police” movements. These are Jewish attempts to defang the goyim using Blacks as “stalking horses” on the way to an oligarchical world government controlled by Jews. Throw in the political repercussions of the Covid-19 pandemic for good measure.

    This has been a long time in the works: the philosophical and conspiratorial roots of Communism, Fabianism, the European Union, the sacralization of Blacks as a tool to devolve Western Civilization, and the “build back better” infrastructure associated with the Covid-19 pandemic. They all inexorably focus on one goal.

    • Agree: ivan
  106. JMcG says:
    @Liza

    She was thirteen. Murdered at 13.

  107. @Paul Bustion

    Jack Dorsey does look Jewish to me, nose ring and all. Besides, a goy could not be a member of that exclusive club in the Silicon Valley. If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck then it’s a duck.

  108. @Thomasina

    Because the ADL was founded on the aftermath of Frank’s deserved death. It’s a chink in their armor that they are conscious of and determine to cover.

    Whenever the ADL is trotted out to do some formulaic condemnation of “hate” nowadays, they are leaving themselves open to a charge (never used, to my knowledge) that their very organization is founded in memory of a rapist-murderer.

    In their twisted Talmudic minds, they are determined to clear the name of this “defamed” mensch.

    • Thanks: Hal Womack
  109. @Philip Power

    thank you Phillip, i have been asking people why they do not use “their” real name anymore?
    Why are Christian people calling them “jews” when they are pharisees?
    “jew” is a modern word.

  110. Its shocking that after all of this time there are political parasites who would still seek to rehabilitate this rat

  111. fnn says:
    @OilcanFloyd

    I’ve read transcripts from the trial in the past…

    You were probably reading newspaper accounts, the trial transcripts have been mysteriously missing for fifty years.
    https://www.leofrank.org/trial-and-evidence/prosecution/

    Alas, the original Leo M. Frank murder trial transcript stenographed in shorthand on legal cap paper in a seven-volume, 3,647+ page tome, which contains both the questions and answers of the Testimony in the Leo M. Frank Murder Trial, was stolen from the Georgia State Archive in the 1960s, around the time ex-con Harry Golden was researching his book, A Little Girl Is Dead, and future professor Leonard Dinnerstein was researching the case for his dissertation thesis at Columbia University. Is this a coincidence? Do these two authors’ books try to subvert the truth about the Leo Frank case? Or must we ask who in the larger community would have a vested interest in these volumes vanishing from the archives? Leo Frank’s defenders or his detractors? Having been missing for over fifty years, these volumes are presumed lost forever. The documents were likely stolen by Leo M. Frank partisans, hoping that all the minutia and deeper details of the case would be gone forever, so it would be harder to prove Leo M. Frank’s guilt to future generations and further cloud the case with mystery and subterfuge that had always been a part of it, especially in the 1980s when the Jewish community agitated for a posthumous pardon of Leo M. Frank.

    • Thanks: Orville H. Larson
  112. geokat62 says:
    @Garliv

    How did America get to such a point!!

    See comment #91.

  113. @dindunuffins

    Interesting. Im certainly no expert on Jewish religious practices but the bit about lying is no different than what Muslims preach. To lie to an unbeliever is an act of faith. That basically means that if you’re not in the “club” you have no idea whether the truth is ever being spoken to you. You have to then rightly assume you are always being lied to.

  114. @aj54

    No doubt, that’s exactly what Frank was counting on. He thought that southern whites were so twisted by the atmosphere of Jim Crow racism that they could easily be manipulated into lynching an innocent black man before any suspicion fell on him.

    Makes you wonder exactly how racist the Jim Crow era was when a bunch of white cops could look at conflicting testimony and conclude that a black man was innocent of all charges.

  115. Anastasia says:

    Incredibly well researched piece by the relative of the victim. But I will remind the author. This is not the first time they have re-written history.

    • Agree: Peripatetic Itch
  116. Anastasia says:

    Frankly I am getting sick and tired of accusations about “the Jews”. Since most people have been judaized who escapes that accusation Only a remnant will be left. We are only required to preserve to the end. Not the end of the world but only the end of our own lives. Who is a Jew? Not me and maybe not even Ron unz. Hey Ron. Are you a Jew? That’s a theological question.

  117. profnasty says:

    George Floyd was a GOOD man.
    Ron Unz supports free speech.
    Ron Unz respects the memory of Jesus Christ.

    Adolph Hitler said it best (sic).
    ‘Nine out of ten people support gang rape.’
    Democracy can solve everything.

    BRING ON THE FOOD STAMPS!

  118. Dumbo says:

    I think all or most agree that only two people could have done it, the Poor Negro or the Rich Jew. It would have been much easier to convict the Poor Negro than the Rich Jew, which tells me that the evidence to convict the Rich Jew must have been overwhelming.

    I think the most likely situation is that Frank didn’t intend to kill Mary, but he killed her by accident, panicked, then called Conley for help, and it’s likely that Conley knew about Frank’s sexual shenanigans and asked for money in exchange for silence or cooperation.

    Wikipedia is bad as usual; but what’s surprising is that I went to the Encyclopedia Britannica (or what passes for it these days), and their article about Leo Frank is ridiculous, saying that he is “probably innocent”. It was written by someone with a Jewish name, so go figure.

  119. @John Q Duped

    your understanding of scripture and the word Jewish is underwhelming. Christ was born of God (1/2 of the dna) combined with 1/2 from Mary who was descended from Adam Abraham and David and thus of their Jewish line.. however He had pure blood (“I have betrayed the innocent blood”) and a sinless nature (unlike all the rest of us who are born with a sinful nature and corrupted blood). That is why He was the perfect sacrificial lamb of God whose blood paid the price for sin. As risen Lord and King he is the ruler over all of God’s Creation and His Church consists of any persons whom accept His atoning sacrifice for their sins and make Him Lord of their lives…. regardless of whether they are Jew (not fake Khazar Talmudic zionist imposters) or gentiles… God is no respecter of persons only looks on the heart and intentions of the heart of man.

  120. @Ron Unz

    ‘Some of your claims were so bizarre, I looked around a bit and apparently your likely source is a notorious disinfo operator.’
    ALL of my claims are based on contemporary newspaper articles written at the time, mainstream historical sources and mainstream genealogical websites. https://www.familysearch.org/photos/artifacts/129610930?p=38639832&returnLabel=Mary%20Anne%20Phagan%20(9K8J-6SZ)&returnUrl=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.familysearch.org%2Ftree%2Fperson%2Fmemories%2F9K8J-6SZ The vast majority of what I said in that article is sourced to mainstream, reliable sources. I only used one non-mainstream source, Lasha Darkmoon. Here is a link to an article I wrote that is thoroughly sourced that discusses all of this. For Hugh Dorsey being a Freemason, see this source https://www.nndb.com/people/146/000206525/
    My source is NOT a single source and the only one of my sources that might be a disinfo operator is Darkmoon.

  121. @Bombercommand

    It is not true that Frank and Conley were the only persons in the pencil factory that day. If you read the contemporary newspaper accounts at the time, you will see that James Gantt, who was a friend of Mary’s, was in the pencil factory that day with the excuse to recover a lost pair of shoes. I don’t understand why none of the historical accounts on either side discuss Gantt, but he was certainly at the factory that day.

    And as I said before, the police initially were most focused on Gantt as a suspect, not on Frank or Conley.

    Here is a collection of contemporary newspaper articles about the case, https://www.familysearch.org/photos/artifacts/129424743?p=38639832&returnLabel=Mary%20Anne%20Phagan%20(9K8J-6SZ)&returnUrl=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.familysearch.org%2Ftree%2Fperson%2Fmemories%2F9K8J-6SZ

    You will see from them that Gantt was in the factory that day. And note that I got these articles from a website, https://www.leofrank.org/ , whose editors are inclined to believe that Frank was guilty. I did not get from a pro-Frank source.

    • Replies: @Bombercommand
  122. @Corrupt

    “How strange that everyone on the ‘Conviction Integrity Unit’ (with the possible exception of the former governor) is a jew. What are the odds?”

    A legitimate observation, to be sure. . . .

    • Replies: @Mulga Mumblebrain
  123. Art says:
    @Thomasina

    Then they will erect a new Leo Frank statue right in the center of Marietta to remind everyone of the evil, racist Whites.

    Yes – a Leo Frank Museum in every city fling the Israeli flag!

  124. @EoinW

    ‘You need to explain more than motive(speculative sexual desire?). How could Gantt, Bowen or anyone else commit the crime?’
    Gantt was in the factory on that day. I’ve already explained that in other posts and I linked to a collection of contemporary newspaper articles in one of them that you can go to for details on that. He went there on the bizarre excuse that he was recovering lost shoes.
    ‘There is no other murder suspect. The only alternative to Frank is Conley and the evidence overwhelmingly indicated Frank did it.’
    That is self evidently false. Police arrested James Gantt, Arthur Mullinax, Newt Lee and Gordon Bailey on suspicion of a role in her murder. If Frank and Conley were the only suspects the others would not have been arrested.

    • Replies: @EoinW
  125. Nancy says:
    @sally

    Couldn’t we just pass a federal law that no one with multiple citizenships can work for any government office? Of course, Israel will just make sure every Judahite government employee knows that he will receive automatic Israeli citizenship when requested, upon leaving foreign government employment. But, still, it might raise doubt in US citizen’s minds about dual citizenship loyalties…

  126. @Garliv

    ‘What really is the REAL REASON ADL & Jewish groups seek to have 100 years old conviction overturned?’

    I suspect it’s a matter of believing their own bullshit. They genuinely think of Frank as a victim of anti-semitism. Therefore, when it comes time to think of another way of banging the anti-semitism drum, what could be more natural than to seek the overturn of Leo Frank’s conviction?

    …this won’t work out well for them in the end — but what else is new?

  127. @Stan d Mute

    I thought Jeffrey Dahmer was white.

  128. @Paul Bustion

    ‘There is at least reasonable doubt as to the guilt of Frank though. I believe that he should not have been convicted or lynched because of reasonable doubt. And there are suspicious circumstances in the case, the ones I mentioned in my previous comment. Given this, I think that we should not certainly conclude that Frank was guilty.’

    Perhaps — but so what? How many similar cases have there been over the last hundred-plus years? Frank received a fair trial by the lights of the time. Should we review every conviction ever handed down?

    Why Frank? Was he some sort of Gandhi of his era? How was he especially virtuous — or especially mistreated?

    • Replies: @Paul Bustion
    , @notbe
    , @Ron Unz
  129. @Jiminy

    six million, they all count

    Mary Phagan’s life was taken. There is no doubt on that point.
    A ton of doubt surrounds your “six million lives were taken”. They do not count. I say it didn’t happen. Where is your evidence?

    • Thanks: profnasty
    • Replies: @Jiminy
  130. @Whataboutery2020

    ‘From Jesus to William of Norwich to Leo Frank, the jews have a pathological desire to absolve themselves of any guilt.’

    I wonder if it’s more than that?

    See the Talmudic notion that if a Jew rapes a three year old girl, the girl should be stoned to death — because she corrupted the Jew.

    There seems to be some cultural notion of the Jewish male as this immaculate pillar of virtue and moral purity, necessarily innocent of any wrong-doing. Here, see the almost repetitive denials and exonerations that follow upon even the most obvious war crimes of the IDF: the Bus 900 episode, the ‘Captain R’ case, that Yemeni who casually shot and killed a wounded Palestinian lying helpless at his feet.

    All militaries do this to some extent — but the IDF takes it to an extreme. Isn’t there some religiously-based notion that ipso facto, someone who is a Jew could not have sinned?

    If the desire is pathological, perhaps it’s a pathology of the religion itself.

    • Agree: Kolya Krassotkin
    • Replies: @anon
    , @Mulga Mumblebrain
  131. To me it’s both curious and telling that after 108 years the ADL, along with other Jewish organizations, remain desperate in their efforts to exonerate Leo Frank. What is so important about Leo Franks to the Jewish community that he be exonerated? How does it help them? To me it raises many questions: 1. it raises questions about the historical account of the holocaust. 2. If the Jews are so adamant to lie, to conceal and obfuscate the evidence of Franks guilt; could they be lying about Auschwitz, Buchenwald and the other labor camps. 3. How does the Frank case fit in with the innate paranoia impressed into the Jewish personality? 4. Is it more important that Jews keep their persecution complex alive, than to accept the factual historical truths, and to assimilate the Jewish population into the main stream population? Something tells me it is all a means to keep Jews in a state of perpetual paranoia as a means to keep the tribes close and on the reservation. What better method than to claim a perpetual persecution of their not so imaginary crimes, and thus to maintain their self ascribed ‘chosen’ status? It’s a withering defense doomed to failure.

    • Agree: Kolya Krassotkin
  132. @JessicaR

    the case of Leo Frank is, unlike the vaccination you took, is settled science

  133. It will take time, but the ADL, Bnai Brith and all their organizations will put all the right people in place in the State of Georgia then will have the case retried by the Supreme Court and they eventually will get Leo Frank exonerated. There will be a big statue of Frank standing next to one of MLK and it will be at the intersection of Martin Luther King Boulevard and Leo Frank Avenue. They might even change the name of Atlanta to Leoville which will create much confusion with Louisville, but what’s a little more confusion in our insane society?

  134. @Paul Bustion

    I meant ALL DAY. You have NOT established that Gantt was in the building AT THE SAME TIME as Mary Phagan, and you CANNOT establish that. Leo Frank was in the building all day and it is a CERTAINTY that Leo Frank was in the SAME ROOM at the SAME TIME as Mary Phagan. All the girls at the pencil factory knew Leo Frank as a sexual molester and the rule among the girls was “never be in the same room alone with Leo Frank”. Mary Phagan, due to circumstances beyond her control, found herself, in the largely deserted pencil factory, alone in the same room with Leo Frank. Mary Phagan paid for that mistake with her “goyische” life, taken from her by Leo Frank.

  135. Publius 2 says:
    @Trinity

    Thank you for this article.

    The world’s foremost problem is well known.

  136. Publius 2 says:

    Jews should not be permitted to testify in court. They lie that blatantly.

    • Replies: @Paul Bustion
  137. @Jiminy

    This, along with the holocaust, should never be forgotten nor forgiven. Whether one life is taken or six million, they all count.

    LOL…My man.

    One small correction. It’s The Holoco$t not “the holocaust”.

  138. @Colin Wright

    ‘How was he especially virtuous? ‘
    I never said anything even hinting at the idea that he was virtuous. I believe that he was a sexual pervert and a sexual predator and he seems to have been a generally quite contemptible person.
    ‘Why Frank? Was he some sort of Gandhi of his era?’
    If you are asking that question of me, I am focused on disproving the claim that Frank murdered her, or at least showing that there is reasonable doubt, because I believe that this narrative against Frank was created as Jewish sponsored AntiSemitism and falling for the narrative has bad practical results, such as falling for the similar narrative about Epstein that is current.
    That is a good question if directed at why Jews are focused on exonerating him. I believe that is the reason that Jews scapegoated him for a murder he did not commit in the first place, so that they could turn their fellow Jews against White Christian America, and make them see it as Edom. It was a dialectic, to create White Christian American AntiSemitism and Jewish AntiChristian/AntiWhite activism. Christopher Bjerknes wrote a series called ‘Hitler: Bolshevist and Zionist’ that discusses Jewish sponsorship of the Nazi Party and Hitler’s regime. I don’t agree with Bjerknes that Hitler was intentionally working for Jews, but I believe that he was to at least a limited extent duped by them into being their ‘controlled opposition,’ an AntiChrist figure, the leader of the Edomites. I believe Frank was duped by his fellow Jews into playing the role of a Jewish martyr, and Mary Phagan’s family were duped by Jews into seeing themselves as victims of a Jewish vampire. So Mary was murdered and Frank scapegoated for and lynched for her murder in order to create this circumstance where there would be AntiSemitism, which would enable Jews to see themselves as victims and cause Jews to hate White Christian America.

  139. Thomasina says:
    @Liza

    She was 13 when she was sexually assaulted and strangled. In my mind that’s still a “little girl”. From Wiki:

    “On April 21, 1913, Phagan was laid off due to a materials shortage. Around noon on April 26, she went to the factory to claim her pay. The next day, shortly before 3:00 a.m., the factory’s night watchman, Newt Lee, went to the factory basement to use the toilet. After leaving the toilet, Lee discovered Phagan’s body in the rear of the basement near an incinerator and called the police.

    Her dress was up around her waist and a strip from her petticoat had been torn off and wrapped around her neck. Her face was blackened and scratched, and her head was bruised and battered. A 7-foot (2.1 m) strip of 1⁄4-inch (6.4 mm) wrapping cord was tied into a loop around her neck, buried 1⁄4 in (6.4 mm) deep, showing that she had been strangled. Her underwear was still around her hips, but stained with blood and torn open. Her skin was covered with ashes and dirt from the floor, initially making it appear to first responding officers that she and her assailant had struggled in the basement.”

    No words to describe the animal who took Mary’s life!

    Was everyone laid off? Was the factory empty of workers when Mary Phagan went to collect her pay around noon? It’s obvious she never made it out of the factory alive, so who was there at 12:00 noon when she arrived? The night watchman wouldn’t even have been there during the day.

    Was her pay ever collected? Did she sign for it? How in the hell does a little girl making 10 cents an hour and working 55 hours a week end up in the basement of some pencil factory, dead?

    • Replies: @Liza
  140. anon[143] • Disclaimer says:
    @Colin Wright

    Or maybe the Jews made a pact with God and are trying to protect it, because in every society there is a nut and why should everyone be punished for eternity for one freaking lunatic but then maybe they should stop being so jewish nationalist as a group, doing things as a whole, but then if they did that well they wouldn’t be the chosen people anymore. They would no longer suffer for God’s love, injustice would no longer be against them. Then POC and Black people would be chosen 🙂 How would any of them worry about going against God’s Commandments. There you go POC’s your chosen, try not to mess it up, and the rest of us are free.

  141. I am sorry that a little girl got murdered 4 of my lifetimes ago, but this is antiquarianism to the extreme.

  142. @Paul Bustion

    Frank was a sexual predator against young females. But he was an otherwise normal person.”

    I don’t get this; how can a person be a sexual predator and a normal person…?

    Does your train of thought/comment turn Weinstain and Epstain into normal men…_?

    • Replies: @Paul Bustion
  143. Ned Kelly says:

    So would you standup for acused rapist/child murderer? If he was your ethnicity? Even if you had some doubts about his guilt? How far would you go? Should you give money for his defense? Would you launch a PR campaign to exonerated him? How about launch a whole watchdog organization in his honor? You really need to think about this one… Because this is the fundamental difference between us and Jews. It still goes on today… just recently seen on the Daily Kos, shamelessly defending Woody– bad Marriage, he was framed… Yada… yada… Yada. What he married his daughter! And got away with it… Its only a shanda fur die Goyim…

  144. @Daniel Rich

    Frank did not have autism or schizophrenia or any mental problem like that. Paul Bowen might have, judging by his behavior that caused the woman in his hotel to report him to the police. He was ranting and yelling at himself that he wished he had not committed an evil act that he had committed, and when police arrested he was found to have a large collection of photographs of young females and letters from them. That is very abnormal. A person could be sexually abnormal but otherwise mentally normal. Virtually all mentally abnormal people are also sexually abnormal, but not all sexually abnormal people are abnormal mentally in other respects.

    The point I was trying to make was that since Paul Bowen appears to have had symptoms of a mental problem like autism, and Frank does not appear to have had such, he would seem a more likely candidate to commit a weird sex murder, other things equal. Other things are equal because the obsessive collecting of photos of young women and letters from such pretty much prove that Bowen was also a sexual pervert and sexual predator.

    I do not know enough about Epstein or Weinstein to comment on whether they were otherwise normal.

    • Replies: @Ned Kelly
  145. @Paul Bustion

    It’s funny, isn’t it. All those people who were there at the time. The police arrested various suspects: black, white, and Jewish. And yet the police, the town, the judge, the jury agreed that it was Frank, the Jew, the businessman, the pervert, Mary’s boss, who did it.

    But Paul Bustion, who never even met Mary or Frank, thinks he knows better, and is willing to aggressively muddy the waters. One wonders why.

  146. @Tony Hall

    Hello Tony.
    I hope that you and your family are well.
    Has been a while since I came across one of posts on UNZ.
    I am interested in what you are doing these days as I have fond memories of youself guest hosting FFWN with Kevin.
    All the best.
    J

  147. notbe says:
    @Colin Wright

    -Frank received a fair trial by the lights of the time… actually the justice system way back then was probably more fairer and less biased than the system we have now

    • Replies: @Colin Wright
  148. Ned Kelly says:
    @Paul Bustion

    He was not normal he was Jewish. It not just his abnormalcy but the whole of the Jewish community– that’s the point of the article…

    • Replies: @Paul Bustion
  149. notbe says:
    @Triteleia Laxa

    exactly- so why is group of people spending time and money trying to exonerate the murderer? it seems to be important to them-why?

    • Replies: @Triteleia Laxa
  150. Nancy says:
    @Stan d Mute

    … ‘other fabrications’…Well, possibly murders in 1955 in Chicago …. ‘someone’ bought up all the papers being delivered one day …. what lengths will the Termites go to?
    http://www.all.net/books/iw/mid-east/unity-news.2000-12-03/www.ummah.net/unity/palestine/judaism/ritual.htm

    • Replies: @Stan d Mute
  151. @Triteleia Laxa

    ‘I am sorry that a little girl got murdered 4 of my lifetimes ago, but this is antiquarianism to the extreme.’

    So you find the behavior of the ADL reprehensible?

    • Replies: @Triteleia Laxa
  152. @notbe

    Because they’re Jews who are obsessed with being Jews and that’s why they work for/with the Jew-obsessed ADL, who also employed Leo Frank.

    Why do Irish people talk about Oliver Cromwell all of the time?

    They’re bores.

    • Replies: @Paul Bustion
  153. @notbe

    ‘-Frank received a fair trial by the lights of the time… actually the justice system way back then was probably more fairer and less biased than the system we have now’

    It’s certainly debatable if we’re in a position to criticize. The cases of O.J. Simpson and Derek Chauvin came to mind as I was typing my post.

  154. EoinW says:
    @Paul Bustion

    It’s been a few years so you’ll have to excuse my facts if they are not precise as I’m working from memory.

    Mary Phagan arrived at the factory at noon hour. She was killed shortly after that time. There were only four people in the factory at that time – Conley hanging around the downstairs entrance, Frank in his 2nd floor office, plus two workmen on the 4th floor.

    Gantt shows up at the factory either 4pm or 6pm. The entire time he in in the building he is accompanied by Newt Lee. Frank insisted on that. Gantt had no opportunity to murder the girl. The same can be said for the other two you mentioned.

    I do not recall any of them being arrested, not even Lee. Even if technically arrested, they were all briefly questioned then released. Newt Lee was the only one held in custody for some time – mainly to protect him from potential lynch mobs.

    Phagan was murdered in the 2nd floor workroom approximately 12:15. How can any of the names you are tossing about commit that murder when none of them were in the building at that time?

  155. Angharad says:
    @OilcanFloyd

    This is disturbing. What was the Jewish boy’s “take”? Was he outraged that a jew was “accused and tried” for raping and murdering a little irrelevant Shiksa (tainted meat. A grotesque reference to female genitalia)? Was he “awed” as in an early ghost hunter type person? Or was he gloating over the trophy of a famous (infamous) fellow Tribesman?

    I’m disgusted. The jew wouldn’t even allow a long dead girl’s grave in peace.

    • Replies: @OilcanFloyd
  156. @Ned Kelly

    There is something weird about Jews. But my point was that Frank was not abnormal to the extent that, say an autistic is. At least one of the other suspects, Paul Bowen, seemed like he might be. And I think that a person with a mental problem like autism would be more likely to commit a crime like this than a person without such a problem. I don’t think Frank was any weirder than typical Jews are. He might have been less weird than most Jews are, to be honest, since he worked in a factory and it is more common for typical Jews to work in pseudo-intellectual jobs as Bolshevist agitators.

    • Replies: @Ned Kelly
  157. notbe says:
    @Paul Bustion

    frank done it and oj done it too in his case

    of course anal probin aliens might have done it…. nah frank done it and oj done it too in his case case closed in both of em

  158. @Colin Wright

    I find it boring and a likely symptom of the people who work for the ADL being a bit mental.

    • Replies: @Colin Wright
  159. @Triteleia Laxa

    ‘the Jew-obsessed ADL, who also employed Leo Frank.’

    Frank was never an employee of the ADL. He led B’Nai Brith in Atlanta before the ADL was founded. The ADL was not founded because of his case, although it did defend him. The ADL is an awful organization and it should be made illegal, I’m not defending it. But Frank never worked for them.

  160. @Triteleia Laxa

    ‘I find it boring and a likely symptom of the people who work for the ADL being a bit mental.’

    But we should just ignore it and let them have their way? Have I got that right?

    • Replies: @Triteleia Laxa
  161. Ned Kelly says:
    @Paul Bustion

    It’s an either-or case… Either Frank or Conley… Southerners would be for more inclined to suspect Conley… So Frank got more ( far more) than a fair trial… I’m amazed Conley even it to trial…

  162. @Colin Wright

    But we should just ignore it and let them have their way? Have I got that right?

    You have the right to do whatever you want.

    I am only interested in why you feel compelled to obsess over a criminal case from a hundred years ago that resulted in the extrajudicial murder of the alleged perpetrator.

    It isn’t like your obsession is even making a difference to the other people obsessed by it.

    Nor is there a victim to save, nor a criminal to punish, if Frank indeed was the criminal, as he was lynched.

    Since I don’t support lynchings, it is certain to me that Frank, even if he did the crime, was also a victim.

    You may also disagree with me on lynchings, which would reasonably motivate you to try to advocate for bringing them back, perhaps by focussing on the great “justice” that happened to Frank, but I don’t think that is your intention?

  163. @Ron Unz

    I agree with Ron Unz on this–If white Southern men in 1913 believed the black janitor had raped-murdered a white girl, they WOULD NOT have let him get away with it.

    • Agree: Colin Wright
    • Replies: @OilcanFloyd
  164. Ron Unz says:
    @Colin Wright

    Perhaps — but so what? How many similar cases have there been over the last hundred-plus years? Frank received a fair trial by the lights of the time. Should we review every conviction ever handed down?

    Actually, that’s actually a tremendous understatement, based upon the facts I pointed out in my article:

    As the wealthy young president of the Atlanta chapter of B’nai B’rith, Frank ranked as one of the most prominent Jewish men in the South, and great resources were deployed in his legal defense, but after the longest and most expensive trial in state history, he was quickly convicted and sentenced to death…

    Currency conversions are hardly precise, but relative to the American family incomes of the time, the total expenditures by Frank supporters may have been as high as $25 million in present-day dollars, quite possibly more than any other homicide defense in American history before or after, and an almost unimaginable sum for the impoverished Deep South of that period. Years later, a leading donor privately admitted that much of this money was spent on perjury and similar falsifications, something which is very readily apparent to anyone who closely studies the case. When we consider this vast ocean of pro-Frank funding and the sordid means for which it was often deployed, the details of the case become far less mysterious. There exists a mountain of demonstrably fabricated evidence and false testimony in favor of Frank, and no sign of anything similar on the other side.

    https://www.unz.com/runz/american-pravda-the-adl-in-american-society/#the-leo-frank-case-and-the-creation-of-the-adl

    • Thanks: JimDandy, Stan d Mute
  165. JimDandy says:
    @Colin Wright

    Infallibility is absolute. Which made the large number taken down by the metoo thing kind of perplexing to me.

  166. @Triteleia Laxa

    “Since I don’t support lynchings, it is certain to me that Frank, even if he did the crime, was also a victim.”

    Nah…..you’re NUTS.

  167. DaveE says:
    @niteranger

    It’s heartening to see people losing their fear of Shlomo. I do hope, however, that Goyim realize the demons they’re up against.

    I pray that the Angels and The Big Guy help us in our struggle, but I think we need to be always on guard to defend ourselves. There really is no act of depravity and violence this $*%m will not employ to create The Jewish Empire on planet Earth, aka Zion, and to kill or enslave all who resist.

  168. Richard B says:
    @Bartolo

    I congratulate Mary Phagan-Kean for being such a staunch defender of the truth after so many decades, and for having the immense courage to stand up to vicious and racist organisation whose business is to lie. Respect!

    Bravo! Great comment!

  169. Richard B says:
    @Thomasina

    Why is this exoneration so important to the ADL? Even with all the evidence and witness testimony, they seem incapable of accepting the fact that a member of their Tribe could ever do anything wrong. They just keep pushing and pushing, lobbying and stacking committees until they get their way.

    I think the best answer to your question is that The ADL, or, Jewish Supremacy Inc., operates 24/7 out of The Dark Triad (lust for power, narcissism, psychopathology).

    In short, it’s what they do because it’s who they are.

    • Replies: @Mulga Mumblebrain
  170. Liza says:
    @dindunuffins

    FFS, I am not sticking up for Mary’s murderer (whoever it was), or any scumbag ghetto trash loser. I just find childish writing an irritant. “Little Mary Phagan” over and over and over sounds as if it was written by a third-grade student.

    • Replies: @Stan d Mute
  171. ivan says:
    @Triteleia Laxa

    They are in their well worn way rewriting history. Same as many of them spending years whitewashing their role in the butchery of the Soviet era. It should count for anyone concerned with the truth. Those guys never sleep. It is their usual M.O. See their hysterics around the Passion of the Christ movie.

  172. Liza says:
    @Thomasina

    I read the detailed story some years ago and felt as if someone dumped a bucket of vomit all over me. Mary deserves better than “Little Mary Phagan” endlessly repeated in an attempt to make the case that cruelty and murder occurred. Thomasina, this is a shitty, childish style of writing. That is all I needed to get out of my system.

    • Replies: @Thomasina
  173. @Nancy

    The problem with tales like the one that you linked is that there is no independently verifiable information. No links to primary contemporary sources, no forensic information, nothing. How odd it is that the two replies to my comment were (1) not remotely relevant to the subject, and (2) in the realm of neurotic fiction.

    Somehow this is instructive to me. I can only hope that others will notice.

  174. @Triteleia Laxa

    ‘I am only interested in why you feel compelled to obsess over a criminal case from a hundred years ago that resulted in the extrajudicial murder of the alleged perpetrator…’

    I’m interested in seeing the day a question involving Jews arises, and you fail to take the Jewish side.

    • Replies: @Triteleia Laxa
  175. @Liza

    FFS, I am not sticking up for Mary’s murderer (whoever it was), or any scumbag ghetto trash loser. I just find childish writing an irritant. “Little Mary Phagan” over and over and over sounds as if it was written by a third-grade student.

    And yet somehow this is the only component of this article and commentary that compelled you to your keyboard..

    “Childish writing” is more disturbing to you than the rape and murder of a young woman or the attempts by an explicitly ethnocentric organization possessing unimaginable wealth and resources trying to bowdlerize the history..

    • Replies: @Liza
  176. Trinity says:

    I just did a (((Wiki))) search on serial killer, child rapist, and cannibal, Albert Fish. (((Wiki))) stated that the father of Fish was of English descent and his mother was Scots-Irish. Other searches list Fish as being a Jew. I have always thought Fish was indeed a Jew, so which is it? Was this demonic devil a Jew Or Not A Jew? Better go over to that site and check it out. lololol. Surely they would not want to claim Fish as a member of the tribe and we can see why (((the usual suspects))) would doctor up the (((Wiki))) article.

  177. @Triteleia Laxa

    ‘I am only interested in why you feel compelled to obsess over a criminal case from a hundred years ago that resulted in the extrajudicial murder of the alleged perpetrator.’

    If Frank was innocent, then he was being framed by his fellow Jews. There is not a plausible way that he could be innocent unless that is what was happening. You have been trying to portray him as a victim of non-Jewish AntiSemites and the commentators attacking him here as non-Jewish AntiSemites. I think that he was innocent but the narrative that you are pushing that Jews did nothing wrong and only non-Jews did is impossible. There are only two possibilities. 1) Frank was guilty. 2) Frank was innocent and was framed by his fellow Jews in order to sponsor AntiSemitism and Jewish AntiWhite/AntiChristian activism. There is no third possibility.

  178. Mary Phagan-Kean may feel differently, but at this remove, I feel the guilt or innocence of Leo Frank and the justice of his subsequent lynching are red herrings.

    He certainly received a fair trial by the lights of the time, and — again by the lights of the time — his lynching was a typical response to what was seen as a perversion of justice. Outraged citizens took the law into their own hands. They did that a lot back then.

    The real point is that Leo Frank was obviously not a victim of anti-semitism; I can’t see any legitimate reason at all for anyone to seek to overturn the verdict now. Justice was done as it was typically done then — if anything, done with more care and thought than usual. Are we to go marching through the past, examining every act of our predecessors and somehow symbolically undoing it if we decide it wasn’t to our taste? It’s not even a matter of righting an injustice. There doesn’t seem to have been any especial injustice. Whether the Frank case took the course we think it should have is irrelevant; it took about the course one would have expected it to have taken in that time and place, and the outcome bore no evident connection to Frank’s Jewishness. In 1913, he received justice as it was dispensed in 1913.

    Nu?

  179. Thomasina says:
    @Liza

    What would you suggest then? The Virgin Mary? There has to be some way to get across that she was a child. “13-year-old Mary Phagan” is too long, and plain old “Mary Phagan” might suggest she was an adult. The “little” separates her from the “adult”, Leo Frank.

    Besides, I’m sure her relatives would rather just let her rest in peace. If not for the ADL and their constant attempts to rewrite history, that’s where she would be. If anyone is “little”, it is the ADL.

    And where do they get off in trying to stack a committee? Considering what they think about revisionists (having them censored and jailed just for asking questions), how is it they get to revise anything? Who gave them permission? Why aren’t they calling for their own jailing?

    • Agree: John Q Duped
    • Replies: @Liza
  180. @Richard B

    I would surmise that the ADL, a most pernicious and dangerous organisation that specialises in defamation, NOT its opposite, knows that Franks was guilty. But the drive to prove their supremacy is such that they must rewrite history, and demonstrate their impunity, IN EVERY CASE. Moreover Frank was a leader in the Jewish community, and it is the Jewish elites who drive the Judaic power lust. And there are other, rather nasty, factors at work, such as the Judaic attitude to the shiksas, as we also saw with Weinstein, Epstein et al.

    • Replies: @Richard B
  181. @Orville H. Larson

    “How strange that most of the Bidet Administration are Jewish”. What are the odds, and what exactly does it mean?

  182. @Colin Wright

    The Talmudic root of this behaviour can be seen in Rabbi Kook the Elder, the former Chief Ashkenazi Rabbi of Palestine’s observation, that, ‘There is a greater difference between the soul of a Jew and that of a non-Jew…than there is between the soul of a non-Jew and that of an animal’. The religion teaches that Jews are a higher form of existence, and that ancient belief can be seen throughout history wherever Jews get the upper hand. Where controlled and protected by strong central authority, Jews can thrive and benefit their host societies, but where they get out of control, as today in the USA, they almost inevitably create a hideous reaction to their overweening power and arrogance.

    • Replies: @Colin Wright
  183. Jiminy says:
    @Badger Down

    I agree. I say it did not happen as told as well. Every time the jewish bean-counters are called out on the fable, they pick a new, lower figure. If the jews want to be taken seriously by anyone not on their payroll, then they really can’t pick and chose what to ridicule and what to believe. With the internet of the 21st century it is becoming harder to hide the truth.
    Obviously the lead up to having the killer Frank exonerated is going on right now. Stuffing all evidence into the memory hole never to be seen again, hopefully forgotten forever, is all part of it. But clearly, and unfortunately for the jewish elite, this lady isn’t going down without a fight. Maybe though I should have written my comment with less of a sardonic tinge to it.

  184. TTA says:

    I am glad Mary Phagan Kean brought out a central point here. The death of this little Phagan girl has been used to promote the “anti-Semitism” myth and to create a false image of Jewish victimhood in America. After Ron Unz recommended the reading of The Leo Frank Case: The Lynching of a Guilty Man, by the Nation of Islam, I now see that Frank was undoubtedly guilty.

    R. Unz: “I have now come to regard the NOI volume as the most persuasive and definitive text on the Frank case” https://www.unz.com/runz/american-pravda-the-adl-in-american-society/

    Frank hired two of the top detective firms and BOTH concluded that Frank was guilty. The “murder notes” lead right back to Frank, and Frank and his team of scoundrels were caught multiple times planting evidence, bribing witnesses, even attempting the murder of a main witness.

    The book goes into this in great detail and many, many footnotes. I agree with Unz.

  185. @Colin Wright

    Is there a functional difference in your definition of “the Jewish side” and being merely not in complete fawning agreement with “Colin Wright”?

    • Replies: @Colin Wright
  186. Liza says:
    @Stan d Mute

    Well, at first glance it does look like you say! But I didn’t mean that poor writing is more disturbing. I was plenty upset when I read the whole story some years ago, with all the details. It was, I think, from court transcripts + commentary.

    Could you maybe throw me a bone by agreeing that a nonmanipulative, grown-up style of expression may have benefits when we are dealing with a controversial issue? Maybe it is precisely because powerful parties are involved that authors have to do their very best. “Little Mary Phagan” over & over won’t cut it.

    Over and out. You can have the last word if you wish. 🙂 However, I think we have both made our points and may have to agree to disagree on a matter of style and why it is so important.

    • Agree: Stan d Mute
  187. Liza says:
    @Thomasina

    What would I suggest? In the opening page, establish that this was a young girl, an innocent girl, who worked hard, who never, ever deserved what happened. Crank it up. And when you have made all of this clear, how about just saying “Mary” afterward. A sweet name that will work on its own. An author can make it work without the constant “little”. It is painful to read over-emotionalized writing, no matter how heinous the crime, undeserving the victim or powerful the liars.

  188. @DICARLO

    I wonder if there are any celebrated cases of some (Jewish) person getting caught with a pile of controversial books stolen from libraries. Eventually some Jewish author will write a book boasting about it, with various diary entries like ~”For thirty years I went from city to city and removed every issue of Ford’s DeerBorn Independent from every library I found them…Etc.”

    Thus, the murder case of Mary Phagan is highly relevant today. It is a sterling example of an ongoing conspiracy to destroy evidence. Tech insiders or hackers have conspired together to target, locate and remove from public access key information, primary source information, about this murder and trial. Colluding with them have been legal counsel lobbying elected representatives who seek to “vacate” the murder conviction of Leo Frank. This is an organized, high powered effort.

    Complaints about the systematic removal (read theft/destruction) of the documents and records should be sent to both media and elected representatives. This can be done with media and politicians in any state, and copies also being sent to the folks in Atlanta. Calls work too. Include or refer to Phagan-Keen’s essay, along with Ron Unz’s tremendous expose on the history of the ADL.

    Because, the ADL was not only spawned by this very murder case a century ago, they remain more powerful and active today in the illegal surveillance, mass censorship and character assassination of countless persons in our country. As such, ADL is a dreadful organization. Its dismantlement and permanent stain of shame should be the primary goal for activists on this case and quite a few others.

  189. You were probably reading newspaper accounts, the trial transcripts have been mysteriously missing for fifty years.

    You are probably right. Whatever I did read, I can’t seem to find it again, but it’s likely been a decade or more since I read it. Either way, it was supposedly a contemporary, first-hand account of the proceedings, and it didn’t make Frank look innocent.

    Dredging up Leo Frank as a victim once again isn’t a good look for Jews, even if their stacked deck gets a win. Doing so doesn’t create cohesion among minorities, and it further alienates whites. Even as an attempt to further destroy the South, it just shows that the point of the trial was to find the actual killer of Mary Phagan, rather than to judge guilt based on the lowest minority or class status.

    As for the lynching, hangings for similar crimes at the time were common, so I’m not sure that the nation is in the mood to condemn citizens taking justice into their own hands against a corrupt elite at the moment.

    Most groups are willing to take the loss after 100 years, but not Jews. And they wonder why they aren’t universally loved!

  190. @SolontoCroesus

    IMO Young [not Little] Mary Phagan is far more compelling than phony Anne Frank

    The facts say so, and making the comparison would be an obvious, and genius, move if we actually had a free press and free expression.

  191. @Triteleia Laxa

    I note you evade the point. Think there’ll ever be an occasion when you take the side that doesn’t favor the Jews?

    • Replies: @Triteleia Laxa
  192. @Angharad

    This is disturbing. What was the Jewish boy’s “take”? Was he outraged that a jew was “accused and tried” for raping and murdering a little irrelevant Shiksa (tainted meat. A grotesque reference to female genitalia)? Was he “awed” as in an early ghost hunter type person? Or was he gloating over the trophy of a famous (infamous) fellow Tribesman

    I don’t know what his take on the case was, because he took my older sister and her friends to the grave. I wasn’t there. I just find it very strange that this case was still so relevant to Jews that even transplant outsider Jews were more familiar and passionate about the case than local gentiles who had never heard of Mary Phagan or Leo Frank.

    Until the last few years, the site of Frank’s lynching was not marked, and unknown to most, I would guess, as was Mary Phagan’s grave.

  193. @Colin Wright

    I took the “side” that is against lynching.

    I also took the “side” that is against trying to draw lessons from relitigating minor historical events, where the epistemological gap is far too large to hope to conclude anything useful.

    Are these the “side” of the Jews?

    I say “side” because reality has so many sides that it is a transdimensional sphere. It only appears two dimensional to you, because that is what you are.

    I feel suffocated trying to engage. You’ll have to do much better for me to continue to bother.

    • Replies: @Colin Wright
  194. @Mulga Mumblebrain

    ‘…Where controlled and protected by strong central authority, Jews can thrive and benefit their host societies, but where they get out of control, as today in the USA, they almost inevitably create a hideous reaction to their overweening power and arrogance…’

    I wonder whether that happy middle ground can actually be a permanent condition — or is it inevitably a transitory state, followed by (1) a Jewish attempt at cultural and economic domination, and then (2) a gentile reaction.

    We may be passing through (1) now. Plausibly, the Seventeenth Century Ukraine and successively, first Twentieth Century Germany and then Russia all passed through both (1) and (2). Perhaps other societies as well: Spain went from advertising itself as ‘the Kingdom of the Three Religions’ (Fourteenth Century or so) to obsessive religious purity (Sixteenth Century). It’d be interesting to survey the history (or absence thereof) of Jewish attempts to dominate their host societies.

    Has there ever been a long-term modus vivendi between Jews and the gentiles around them? Perhaps in the Muslim world. The Ottoman Empire? Morocco? Islamic Spain?

  195. @Triteleia Laxa

    ‘…Are these the “side” of the Jews?”

    In all the instances where you feel impelled to pick a side; yes, apparently.

    That’s my point.

    ‘…I feel suffocated trying to engage. You’ll have to do much better for me to continue to bother.’

    Whatever will I do. I dunno. Maybe I just can’t meet your high standards. You do keep evading the question, though, don’t you? Shall I repeat it a third time?

    Think there’ll ever be an occasion when you take the side that doesn’t favor the Jews?

  196. @Thomasina

    Then they will erect a new Leo Frank statue right in the center of Marietta to remind everyone of the evil, racist Whites. Newspaper articles will be written yearly on the anniversary of Leo Frank’s death. Maybe a museum gets built, right next to one of the Holocaust museums.

    The local college had an Ann Frank exhibit (still may, for all I know) which is odd, since it practically sits on the grounds of a major Civil War battlefield. A recent director of a Civil War museum nearby switched the focus of the museum to trains, despite having important Civil War artifacts, and being near the site of important Civil War battlefields. He also compared Confederate soldiers to Nazis. A Leo Frank statue is possible.

  197. @David In TN

    I agree with Ron Unz on this–If white Southern men in 1913 believed the black janitor had raped-murdered a white girl, they WOULD NOT have let him get away with it.

    Jim Crow and racism aside, I feel pretty sure that white, southern men of any era would convict a guilty white of child rape and murder over an obviously innocent black. I don’t think many would put prejudice above guilt in such a case, unless he were guilty himself or had an interest in having the guilty walk free.

  198. @Colin Wright

    ‘I wonder whether that happy middle ground can actually be a permanent condition — or is it inevitably a transitory state, followed by (1) a Jewish attempt at cultural and economic domination, and then (2) a gentile reaction.

    We may be passing through (1) now. Plausibly, the Seventeenth Century Ukraine and successively, first Twentieth Century Germany and then Russia all passed through both (1) and (2). ‘

    You are implying that Stalin’s regime persecuted Jewry in reaction to Lenin’s and Trotsky’s regime making Jews privileged.

    That is absolutely not true. Stalin never persecuted Jews, Jews were just as privileged under Stalin as they were under Lenin and Trotsky.

  199. @Ron Unz

    ‘Some of your claims were so bizarre, I looked around a bit and apparently your likely source is a notorious disinfo operator.’
    I have already said what my sources were in previous posts.
    But your statement that my likely source is a ‘notorious disinfo operator,’ is very vague. Who is this ‘disinfo operator’ you reference?
    I did not use any conspiracy sources for my main statements about the case, either in my comments or in the articles I wrote that I linked in my comments, the only one I used that might be considered a conspiracy source was Lasha Darkmoon and I only used that to justify my statement that Jews were heavily in prostitution, which I think is an obviously true statement and is off topic to my main points on the case anyway.

  200. @Publius 2

    Five of the grand jurors who voted to indict Frank were Jews. One of them, Albert Guthman, was the second cousin of two of the defense attorneys of Frank, Herbert Haas and Leonard Haas. I documented how they were related in one of the articles I wrote that I linked in another post.
    By your reasoning, that should also make you suspicious of the case against Frank.

  201. EH says:

    The comments reviling Leo Frank’s people accomplish nothing against those of them committing these criminal outrages, rather they strengthen their cohesion by giving them toothless opposition.

    Let’s talk about practical actions against specific people who have broken and continue to break existing law:

    In Georgia, filing a false document is a felony, as is influencing witnesses, destroying documents, interfering with or attempting conspiring to do so. These are just two of many qualifying offenses that fall under the racketeering statutes (RICO), which have extreme penalties. RICO cases may be brought not only criminally but civilly; civil RICO cases may be brought by anyone against any person or group, including government agencies.

    I have been researching the Georgia RICO laws since about a year ago to go after a sweatshop, the workers’ compensation defense bar and State Board of W.C. , and more recently large apartment complexes and the trade association that writes their leases. The medical industries and their pocket regulators such as the CDC are another target I’d like to go after. I’m not an attorney (though I long ago worked in a law office), and I’m recently disabled, so it’s more than I can do on my own.

    The legal tools needed to scour out the pervasive corruption rotting all our institutions are already on the books, but it won’t happen by lone individuals taking on the whole system, only with others — such as you reading this now — joining to take down the condescending criminals infesting every executive position.

    [MORE]

    Select portions of the Georgia RICO (Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations) Act – [it’s worth at least skimming, though it seems long]

    § 16-14-3 [RICO] Definitions
    (4) “Pattern of racketeering activity” means:
    (A) Engaging in at least two acts of racketeering activity in furtherance of one or more incidents, schemes, or transactions that have the same or similar intents, results, accomplices, victims, or methods of commission or otherwise are interrelated by distinguishing characteristics and are not isolated incidents, provided at least one of such acts occurred after July 1, 1980, and that the last of such acts occurred within four years, excluding any periods of imprisonment, after the commission of a prior act of racketeering activity;

    (5) (A) “Racketeering activity” means to commit, to attempt to commit, or to solicit, coerce, or intimidate another person to commit any crime which is chargeable [not charged or convicted!] by indictment under the laws of this state involving: [~all violent crimes, and many others, including: forgery, bribery, …]
    (xxv) Perjury and other related offenses in violation of Article 4 of Chapter 10 of this title; [including filing false documents]
    (xxvi) Embracery in violation of Code Section 16-10-91;

    (xxvii) Influencing witnesses in violation of Code Section 16-10-93;

    (xxviii) Tampering with evidence in violation of Code Section 16-10-94;

    (xxix) Intimidation or injury of grand or trial juror or court officer in violation of Code Section 16-10-97; […]

    (B) “Racketeering activity” shall also mean any act or threat involving murder, kidnapping, gambling, arson, robbery, theft, receipt of stolen property, bribery, extortion, obstruction of justice, dealing in narcotic or dangerous drugs, or dealing in securities which is chargeable under the laws of the United States, any territory of the United States, or any state and which is punishable by imprisonment for more than one year.

    (C) “Racketeering activity” shall also mean any conduct defined as “racketeering activity” under 18 U.S.C. Section 1961 (1), any violation of 18 U.S.C. Section 1028, or any violation of 31 U.S.C. Sections 5311 through 5330.
    [(B) and (C) incorporate literally hundreds, if not thousands of different statutes]

    § 16-14-4. [RICO] Prohibited activities
    (a) It shall be unlawful for any person, through a pattern of racketeering activity or proceeds derived therefrom, to acquire or maintain, directly or indirectly, any interest in or control of any enterprise, real property, or personal property of any nature, including money.

    (b) It shall be unlawful for any person employed by or associated with any enterprise to conduct or participate in, directly or indirectly, such enterprise through a pattern of racketeering activity.

    (c) It shall be unlawful for any person to conspire or endeavor to violate any of the provisions of subsection (a) or (b) of this Code section. A person violates this subsection when:

    (1) He or she together with one or more persons conspires to violate any of the provisions of subsection (a) or (b) of this Code section and any one or more of such persons commits any overt act to effect the object of the conspiracy; or

    (2) He or she endeavors to violate any of the provisions of subsection (a) or (b) of this Code section and commits any overt act to effect the object of the endeavor.

    § 16-14-6. [RICO] Civil remedies [In full]
    (a) Any superior court may, after making due provisions for the rights of innocent persons, enjoin violations of Code Section 16-14-4 by issuing appropriate orders and judgments, including, but not limited to:

    (1) Ordering any defendant to divest himself or herself of any interest in any enterprise, real property, or personal property;

    (2) Imposing reasonable restrictions upon the future activities or investments of any defendant, including, but not limited to, prohibiting any defendant from engaging in the same type of endeavor as the enterprise in which he or she was engaged in violation of Code Section 16-14-4;

    (3) Ordering the dissolution or reorganization of any enterprise;

    (4) Ordering the suspension or revocation of any license, permit, or prior approval granted to any enterprise by any agency of the state; or

    (5) Ordering the forfeiture of the charter of a corporation organized under the laws of this state or the revocation of a certificate authorizing a foreign corporation to conduct business within this state upon a finding that the board of directors or a managerial agent acting on behalf of the corporation, in conducting affairs of the corporation, has authorized or engaged in conduct in violation of Code Section 16-14-4 and that, for the prevention of future criminal activity, the public interest requires that the charter of the corporation be forfeited and that the corporation be dissolved or the certificate be revoked.

    (b) Any aggrieved person or the state may institute a civil action under subsection (a) of this Code section. In such civil action, relief shall be granted in conformity with the principles that govern the granting of injunctive relief from threatened loss or damage in other civil cases, provided that no showing of special or irreparable damage to the person shall have to be made. Upon the execution of proper bond against damages for an injunction improvidently granted and a showing of immediate danger of significant loss or damage, a temporary restraining order and a preliminary injunction may be issued in any such action before a final determination on the merits.

    (c) Any person who is injured by reason of any violation of Code Section 16-14-4 shall have a cause of action for three times the actual damages sustained and, where appropriate, punitive damages. Such person shall also recover attorney’s fees in the trial and appellate courts and costs of investigation and litigation reasonably incurred. The defendant or any injured person may demand a trial by jury in any civil action brought pursuant to this Code section.

    (d) Any injured person shall have a right or claim to forfeited property or to the proceeds derived therefrom as set forth in Code Section 9-16-16.

    (e) A conviction in any criminal proceeding shall estop the defendant in any subsequent civil action or civil forfeiture proceeding under this chapter as to all matters proved in the criminal proceeding.

    § 16-10-93. Influencing witnesses (b) (1) It shall be unlawful for any person knowingly […] to engage in misleading conduct toward another person with intent to: […] (B) Cause or induce any person to:

    (i) Withhold testimony or a record, document, or other object from an official proceeding;

    (ii) Alter, destroy, mutilate, or conceal an object with intent to impair the object’s integrity or availability for use in an official proceeding; […]
    (C) Hinder, delay, or prevent the communication to a law enforcement officer, prosecuting attorney, or judge of this state of information relating to the commission or possible commission of a criminal offense […]
    (2) Any person convicted of a violation of this subsection shall be guilty of a felony and, upon conviction thereof, shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than two nor more than ten years or by a fine of not less than $10,000.00 nor more than $20,000.00, or both.

    (3) (A) For the purposes of this Code section, the term “official proceeding” means any hearing or trial conducted by a court of this state or its political subdivisions, a grand jury, or an agency of the executive, legislative, or judicial branches of government of this state or its political subdivisions or authorities.

    (B) An official proceeding need not be pending or about to be instituted at the time of any offense defined in this subsection.

    (C) The testimony, record, document, or other object which is prevented or impeded or attempted to be prevented or impeded in an official proceeding in violation of this Code section need not be admissible in evidence or free of a claim of privilege.

    (D) In a prosecution for an offense under this Code section, no state of mind need be proved […]

  202. ‘The comments reviling Leo Frank’s people accomplish nothing against those of them committing these criminal outrages, rather they strengthen their cohesion by giving them toothless opposition.’

    Focusing on individual instances of Jewish criminality is focusing on something that is essentially irrelevant and that also carries the risk of making the focus on a case where the particular Jew is innocent, which I believe was the case with Frank.

    Jewish group behavior is the problem. Jews as a group are promoting the undermining of the interests of ethnic Europeans through massive non-European immigration and through the promotion of Black causes and so forth. That is the real issue. Not individual criminal outrages of Jews. It it s a mistake for people worried about Jewish power to make their main focus things like Frank’s case. The focus should be on the Jewish group behavior of promoting Black causes and massive Third World immigration and subordinating the foreign policy of their countries to Jewish interests. Focusing on particular cases of Jews committing sexual crimes or other crimes is focusing something that, in my judgement, is essentially irrelevant.

  203. @Colin Wright

    Well the Jews lived in Mesopotamia pretty happily for many centuries, until the Zionazis ordered them to move to Occupied Palestine. When they proved hesitant, a few false-flag attacks on synagogues etc stampeded them nicely, to become second-class citizens under the Ashkenazi elect.

  204. @Colin Wright

    Eustace Mullins nominated the Byzantine Empire as the only long-term polity that managed its Jews for a relatively stable millenium.

    According to him, Jews were given free reign in the empire, except for government, finance, and education. This seemed to keep the most critical functions of Byzantine society relatively untainted by subversion.

    Of course, the Byzantines are no more, so even this enviable record may show that even long-term stability has its limits.

  205. @ivan

    If you failed to see the irony in your argument that it’s sensible to follow the Jew who warned you explicitly that you shouldn’t follow the Jews, I’m afraid I cannot help you..

  206. @Triteleia Laxa

    Well, ordinarily the whole thing would have probably been forgotten, but those super smart Jews decided to found a “civil rights organization” in memory of this murdering perv shitbag Leo Frank.

    Kinda like how the blacks are erecting statues and murals of Saint George Floyd.

    Of course they were trained in the art by the Undisputed Masters of Chutzpah and Victimology themselves.

    • Replies: @Paul Bustion
  207. @The Griffins

    There is reasonable doubt of the guilt of Frank. There are only two possibilities with Floyd. Either Floyd’s death was a hoax that he was complicit in, or he deserved to be killed. There is no reasonable third possibility. There is a reasonable possibility that Frank was innocent of Mary’s murder and was lynched for it. So the analogy between Floyd and Frank is a bad one.
    Henry Ford believed that Frank was innocent and Ford was antiJewish.

    • Replies: @Ron Unz
  208. Timbo33 says:

    The Tribe members never take any responsibility for their crimes. This goes back even before the notorious Dreyfus Affair where the creep was indeed guilty of his crime. He became a cause celebre in France much to the disgrace of that country and to his promoters – including the author of “J’accuse”. Never forget what the horrible rosenbergs did to our country or the sinking of the USS Liberty by Israel – deliberately done to obscure that horrible country’s crimes.

  209. Richard B says:
    @Mulga Mumblebrain

    ut the drive to prove their supremacy is such that they must rewrite history, and demonstrate their impunity, IN EVERY CASE

    Bingo! That’s exactly right.

  210. Ron Unz says:
    @Paul Bustion

    Henry Ford believed that Frank was innocent and Ford was antiJewish.

    You really have a very poor understanding of the historical situation.

    The Jewish activists supporting Frank totally dominated the national media, which published numerous distorted or dishonest articles portraying Frank as innocent, and that was the only source of information to individuals living outside the Georgia area.

    As part of their campaign to save Frank, they enlisted statements of support from a whole host of prominent national figures from all walks of life, with Henry Ford merely being one of many. As far as I know, all he did was sign some letter or petition on Frank’s behalf. And at that point in time, absolutely no one in America regarded Ford as being hostile towards Jews.

    This raises the very interesting possibility that Ford’s later discovery that he’d been manipulated and hoodwinked by Frank’s Jewish supporters may have been a significant factor in his growing suspicions about Jewish behavior. It’s rather telling that his series The International Jew provided an extremely detailed and comprehensive catalog of Jewish crimes and misbehavior but very conspicuously avoided all mention of the Frank case.

    • Thanks: Truth Vigilante
    • Replies: @Colin Wright
  211. ‘ It’s rather telling that his series The International Jew provided an extremely detailed and comprehensive catalog of Jewish crimes and misbehavior but very conspicuously avoided all mention of the Frank case.’
    That would suggest that he either believed that Frank was innocent, or at least did not believe that Frank was guilty, in my view.
    Henry Ford also had done business with the Bolshevists after they came to power and had politically allied himself with Rosika Schwimmer during the first war, that did not stop him from attacking Bolshevism.
    ‘You really have a very poor understanding of the historical situation.

    The Jewish activists supporting Frank totally dominated the national media, which published numerous distorted or dishonest articles portraying Frank as innocent, and that was the only source of information to individuals living outside the Georgia area.’
    I know that Jews ran the news media then. But they would have been defending Frank even if he really were innocent. They would defend him whether he were innocent or guilty.
    Jews have sponsored AntiSemitism, so that they can accuse White Christians of persecuting them, many times in history. I believe that this was one of those cases.

  212. @Ron Unz

    ‘It’s rather telling that his series The International Jew provided an extremely detailed and comprehensive catalog of Jewish crimes and misbehavior but very conspicuously avoided all mention of the Frank case.’

    On the other hand, Ford may have merely wished to avoid dubious evidence. If I’m constructing an argument, I avoid questionable support and rely on the indisputable facts. Surely it’s possible Frank didn’t kill Mary Phagan. At least equally to the point, many of Ford’s readers would have been skeptical of his guilt. Given that, why cite the case? Presumably Ford felt his other examples provided better ammunition.

    • Replies: @Hamlet's Ghost
  213. anon[339] • Disclaimer says:
    @Thomasina

    Why is this exoneration so important to the ADL? Even with all the evidence and witness testimony, they seem incapable of accepting the fact that a member of their Tribe could ever do anything wrong. They just keep pushing and pushing, lobbying and stacking committees until they get their way.

    they did the same thing with the jews who gave atomic secrets to the Soviets – Julius and Ethel Rosenberg – refusing to believe their complicity

    unfortunately in this case there will be no Venona transcripts to confirm Leo Frank’s guilt

  214. anon[339] • Disclaimer says:

    These sources — and many, many more like them — use to be available on the internet until very recently. Indeed, the books, videos, articles, and court documents that provide a balanced view of the case have been systematical­ly removed from the internet SINCE THE Fulton County CONVICTION INTEGRITY UNIT WAS ANNOUNCED!

    Lee Stranahan, formerly of Breitbart, pointed this out as well. He did an episode on the Leo Frank case about 2-3 years ago on his podcast Fault Lines Radio and then went back re-checking his sources a few months later on the internet and found that many of them were missing.

    btw Stranahan’s conclusion was that Leo Frank was guilty and he hated to admit that many online “Nazi” websites had some of the best and most accurate information on the case, lol

  215. @Colin Wright

    Henry Ford was a very busy man in 1913. It was the year he started the best-selling assembly line Model T, and hardly had time to investigate the Frank case from Detroit. Most likely he was buttonholed by pushy newsmen for some notable quote looking to build public pressure for Frank’s release.

    Ford didn’t notice the Jewish hand in world affairs until he boarded a “peace ship” during the Great War to try to end it by docking at the ports of the warring nations. Onboard he later wrote how a Jew had told him that the ship’s mission was futile, since it was in the Jewish interest for the war to continue and it wouldn’t stop until the Jews made it stop.

    He recounted this tale in the International Jew, offering a free copy to all buyers of a new Model T.

  216. anon[339] • Disclaimer says:
    @Philip Power

    Maimonaides:

    “[T]he Negroes found in the remote South, and those who resemble them from among them that are with us in these climes. The status of those is like that of irrational ANIMALS. To my mind THEY DO NOT HAVE THE RANK OF MEN, but have among the beings a rank lower than the rank of man BUT HIGHER THAN THE RANK OF APES. For they have the external shape and lineaments of a man and a faculty of discernment that IS SUPERIOR TO THAT OF APES.

    Those who are incapable of attaining to supreme religious values include the BLACK coloured people and those who resemble them in their climates. Their nature is like the MUTE ANIMALS. Their level among existing things is below that of a man and above that of a monkey.”

    there is a hospital in New York City named after this (((Maimonaides)))

    seems like a great opportunity to draw attention to jewish racism with a protest or demonstration

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply -


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
$
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Mary Phagan-Kean Comments via RSS
PastClassics
The JFK Assassination and the 9/11 Attacks?
Analyzing the History of a Controversial Movement
Our Reigning Political Puppets, Dancing to Invisible Strings