The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 Andrew Joyce Archive
Lying About Judeo-Bolshevism
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

A Specter Haunting Europe: The Myth of Judeo-Bolshevism
Paul Hanebrink
Harvard University Press, 2018.

The writing and discussion of Jewish historiography in contemporary mainstream academia requires a sublime choreography. It’s basically a series of evasions resembling dances, in which facts are presented and parried, and flamboyant narratives are advanced which everyone knows to be false but which emerge repetitively and shamelessly. My attention was first drawn to Paul Hanebrink’s A Specter Haunting Europe: The Myth of Judeo-Bolshevism by Christopher Browning’s recent glowing review, titled “The Fake Threat of Jewish Communism,” in the New York Review of Books. Browning is an establishment historian with a record of legally assisting Jews — for the right price. As well as receiving over $30,000 from Deborah Lipstadt to testify against David Irving, Browning has testified against a significant number of European ex-soldiers at war crimes trials. Although his most notable work, Ordinary Men: Reserve Police Battalion 101 and the Final Solution in Poland (1992), contains the less than remarkable thesis that war turns ordinary men into killers, Browning’s dedication to the Jewish narrative has led to his becoming a true guru of Jewish victimology. Having received awards and funds from organizations including Yad Vashem and the USC Shoah Foundation Center and copious promotion in mainstream media and academia, Browning’s certificate of praise in the field is potentially career-making. Evidently, he has chosen to bestow his magic touch on Paul Hanebrink. In this essay I want to explore the approach of both Browning’s review and Hanebrink’s text as exercises in the manufacture of duplicitous histories.

I had to look twice at Browning’s headline. My first thought was: “Really? You really want to take this subject matter on? You really think you can ‘debunk’ the facticity of Jewish Communism?” Such an endeavor would unquestionably require abundant chutzpah, but it is clear from the very beginning of the review that this will be an effort of evasion rather than outright debate. As Browning states in the opening paragraph, “Hanebrink’s approach is not to repeat what he considers an error of the interwar era—the futile attempt to refute a myth on the basis of historical facts and statistical data.” Although this evasion is predictable, it’s quite remarkable to see a more or less open admission from two allegedly masterful historians that they don’t possess facts sufficient to dispel the very “myth” they set out to challenge. To describe any such presentation of facts as a “futile attempt” seems intellectually flaccid; a concession of the weakness of one’s case.

But what is really presented here, of course, is the standard structure of Jewish historiography: avoid the facts, downplay them if concession is absolutely necessary, and move the discussion into abstractions and sophistry. Taking a page from the ADL playbook, Browning mewls coyly that “a small kernel of truth underpinned the stereotype of the Jewish Bolshevik,” but insists, regarding Communism, that “the Jew as “the face of the revolution” was a “culturally constructed” perception.” We therefore arrive at the familiar position where facts don’t matter and everything Jews don’t like is triumphantly declared a mere construct.

Christopher Browning: Virulent Philosemite
Christopher Browning: Virulent Philosemite

Browning’s review is littered with cliché, which in turn betrays an interpretation of anti-Semitism heavily influenced by a fellow useful philosemite, the late Gavin Langmuir. I profiled Langmuir’s research at length four years ago, during which I wrote:

Langmuir’s work mimicked Jewish productions by essentially absolving medieval Jewish populations of any responsibility in provoking negative reactions from their Christian host populations, and by ascribing to Christian/Western society a deep-seated psychological malfunction shot through with fantasy, repression, and sadism. Despite his actually very limited expertise in medieval legal history, Langmuir saw fit to quickly make grand pronouncements on the nature and origins of anti-Jewish feeling across Europe and over the course of centuries. His works, often with pitifully thin evidence of wider reading, portrayed anti-Semitism as “a primarily Western phenomenon.”[1]G. Langmuir, History, Religion and Antisemitism (Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1990), 15. He arrogantly claimed to have been able to “define Christianity and categorize its manifestations, including Catholicism, objectively.”[2]Ibid, 13.
(G. Langmuir, History, Religion and Antisemitism (Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1990), 15.)
He bluntly confessed in his books that “I shall not discuss pagan attitudes to Jews in antiquity.”[3]Ibid, 275.
(G. Langmuir, History, Religion and Antisemitism (Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1990), 15.)
He dismissively described attempts to come to rational, interest-based, theories of inter-group conflict between Jews and non-Jews as “misguided pseudoscientific efforts of racial theorists,” and even argued that attempts to come to “common sense” explanations of anti-Semitism would prove “disastrous.”[4]Ibid, 19 & 67.
(G. Langmuir, History, Religion and Antisemitism (Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1990), 15.)
Anti-Semitism was instead “both in its origin and in its recent most horrible manifestation … the hostility aroused by irrational thinking about Jews.”[5]Ibid, 265.
(G. Langmuir, History, Religion and Antisemitism (Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1990), 15.)

Browning fully subscribes to Langmuir’s line of thought, commenting on Hanebrink’s text:

The Jew of the Middle Ages, an infidel, became the Jew of the twentieth century, a political subversive. With emancipated Jews being the most visible beneficiaries of the modern commercial and industrial economy by the end of the nineteenth century, the medieval epithet of Jewish usury had already been replaced with that of rapacious Jewish capitalism, and after 1914 the image of the Jew as an economic threat was only intensified by accusations of Jewish war profiteering and black marketeering. The Jew as a clannish outsider in medieval Christendom was easily transformed into the Jew as an unassimilable minority and alien internal threat.

The factors in common in Langmuir and Browning are the total need for there to be a psychological and cultural connection between anti-Jewish attitudes in the Middle Ages and the present. This is explained in the assertions of both historians as essentially religious/irrational in origin, and these assertions are in turn supported by a frequent scattering of persuasive keywords that act as incantations that charm the reader into certain ways of seeing. Note Browning’s insistence upon the position of Jew as spiritual infidel, and the clear evasion of the very real phenomenon of Jewish usury, which is reduced in Browning’s estimation to a mere “epithet.” Jewish economic competition in the modern period is caricatured as an irrational “image,” and Jewish war profiteering is simply an “accusation.” Epithets, images, accusations, and the passive and innocent Jew. In sociological-psychological terms this is classic Freud and Frankfurt School, and in historiography it is classic Langmuir.

As with Langmuir’s sophistry, such assertions require a significant amount of either duplicity or cognitive dissonance, or perhaps both. The number of texts covering historical Jewish black-market activity alone is astonishing. We know from one Stanford-published history, for example, that in France in 1941, 90% of black market traders in one province were Jews.[6]Michael Murras, Vichy France and the Jews (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1981), p.183. Similarly, in Mark Roodhouse’s Oxford-published Black Market Britain: 1939–1955, it is remarked that Jews were massively over-represented in prosecutions for black-market activity in London during the 1940s.[7]Mark Roodhouse, Black Market Britain, 1939-1955 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013), p. 159. The biggest war profiteer in the trade of illicit food in war-time Britain was the Jew Sidney Seymour, born Skylinsky, who received the heaviest sentence of the period for a black market offence after evading food regulations and stockpiling black-market food at his synagogue.[8]Ibid, p. 234.
(Mark Roodhouse, Black Market Britain, 1939-1955 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013), p. 159.)
These are just two small examples plucked randomly from the available histories, but the point here is that, for Browning as with Langmuir, it is the supposedly irrational “accusation” and not the “futile” facts that matter.

Browning continues with the predictable explanation for the very real Jewish dominance on the Left:

Even before the crisis of 1918–1919, which combined the experiences of defeat and revolution for many Europeans, Jews were invariably disproportionately represented in liberal and socialist parties because they were not welcome to participate in conservative and Catholic political parties. The tendency to stigmatize anything to the left of conservative as Jewish was already evident in 1912, when the electoral victory in Germany of the liberal democrats, Social Democrats, and Catholics—who also made up the “Weimar Coalition” of 1919 that was largely responsible for drafting the Weimar Constitution, so despised by German conservatives—was dubbed the “Jew election.” [emphasis added]

We’re again in very familiar territory: when you feel you can’t avoid a fact (“Jews were invariably disproportionately represented”), and you can’t downplay it, then explain it by way of prejudice (“they were not welcome”). The problem with snapshots of history like this, as I’ve explained many times before, is what I’ve come to term a “cropped timeline explanation” — something that is extremely common in all Jewish and philosemitic historiography concerning anti-Semitism. When faced with an uncomfortable and unavoidable fact involving Jewish behavior (Leftism, usury, financial crime, pornography, etc.) one starts with assumptions of anti-Jewish prejudice and works from there. Jews are on the Left? It must be because they were excluded from the Right. Problems begin to arise when the question is asked why Jews were excluded or viewed as socially or culturally oppositional in the first place. Here, “irrational prejudice” is the last resort, but beyond it, when faced with further interrogation of that idea and the even deeper historical context, nothing is there. One is confronted with blank stares, rhetorical dead ends, and a factual wasteland.

By now I was already getting the sense that Browning was drowning in his own review, under the sheer weight of his own evasions and contortions. The questions, for any reader, were surely multiplying. Were Jews over-represented in Communism or not? If yes, how is the idea of Jewish leftism a myth? If the ‘myth’ can’t be debunked with facts, how can it be debunked by a work of academic sophistry that labels it a cultural construct? The contortions only worsen. Browning continues:

From the beginning of World War I, tsarist Russia had treated its Jewish subjects as unreliable and potentially disloyal. Its military forcibly displaced some 500,000 to one million Jews from combat zones. The very approach of the Russian army thus also instigated the flight of many other Jews from the eastern regions of the Austro-Hungarian Empire to the presumed safety of cities like Vienna and Budapest. The Russian Revolution erupted amid already existing fears about Jewish loyalty and floods of displaced Jews, and intensified those fears. The “panic” over Judeo-Bolshevism, Hanebrink argues, “flourished in ground that had been prepared by wartime paranoia about Jewish loyalty.”

This is another excellent example of the employment of cropped timeline explanations. Browning implies that concerns about Jewish leftism were grounded in a “paranoia” about Jewish loyalty but doesn’t feel the need to contextualize this “paranoia” with any historical considerations concerning the period prior to 1914. Anyone even remotely familiar with the literature, and honest in their conclusions, would assert that Russian Jewry was a ticking time bomb of radicalism, bitterly hostile to Russia, and enjoying the rabid support of Jews worldwide. Marsha Rozenblit and Jonathan Karp noted in World War I and the Jews (2017) that Jews across Europe regarded the outbreak of war as “a holy war against a barbaric, evil, and rapacious enemy, the enemy of freedom and culture, and the traditional enemy of the Jews, a modern Amalek who committed atrocities against the Jews both in Russia and in occupied Galicia.”[9]Marsha Rozenblit and Jonathan Karp, World War I and the Jews: Conflict and Transformation in Europe, the Middle East and America (New York: Berghahn, ), p.36. Rozenblit and Karp write that “for Jews in particular, the destruction of this enemy was of primary importance.”[10]Ibid, p.37.
(Marsha Rozenblit and Jonathan Karp, World War I and the Jews: Conflict and Transformation in Europe, the Middle East and America (New York: Berghahn, ), p.36.)
This all fits extremely well with Kevin MacDonald’s explanation of Jewish leftism as rooted in the Jewish self-concept as victim, the extreme hostility of Jews to non-Jewish power structures, their view of leftism as providing the means and power to topple traditional elites, and an excellent way of facilitating the consolidation of their position as a hostile elite. None of this features in Browning’s commentary of course because, by his estimation, the Russian elite was merely paranoid to think that Jews were potentially dangerous.

Paul Hanebrink
Paul Hanebrink

At this point, I temporarily abandoned Browning and sought out Hanebrink’s text. Content aside, to me the most obvious drawback of any such project would be stark unoriginality, the monograph acting essentially as a quasi-plagiarism of the woeful The Myth of Jewish Communism: A Historical Interpretation (2011) by André Gerrits of Leiden University.[11]André Gerrits, The Myth of Jewish Communism: A Historical Interpretation (Brussels: PIE Peter Lang, 2009). Poor Gerrits doesn’t even get a mention from the crafty Hanebrink, who managed to get the ever-philosemitic Harvard University Press [with a Board that is more than 40% Jewish] to publish his rather light piece of work, perhaps at least partially on the sales pitch that it was novel. Muddying the waters still further, reviews of the work of Gerrits prefigure the Browning review in their multifarious contortions. Thus, we are treated to a review of Gerrits by Eliezer Ben-Rafael of Tel-Aviv University, who asserts that Gerrits tackles “the myth of Jewish Communism” by presenting “the fascinating stories of Jewish Communism and Jewish Communists.” If debunking ideas with proof of their veracity wasn’t enough, it’s explained in one banal revelation that the myth combines “anti-Semitism and anti-Communism,” and has a link to reality in the fact that “in effect, many Jews were prominently involved in Communism not only in Russia, but also in the Hungarian and Bavarian revolutions of 1917 and, after the Second World War, in Czechoslovakia, Romania, Lithuania, Poland, and Bulgaria.”[12]Eliezer Ben-Rafael, “André Gerrits, The Myth of Jewish Communism: A Historical Interpretation,” International Sociology Review of Books, Volume: 26 issue: 2, pp, 260-263, p.260. Jewish Communism is thus clearly a myth because Jews were prominently involved in Communist revolutions in several countries over several decades. Right.

ORDER IT NOW

Paul Hanebrink’s text is political activism as much as corrupt historiography. In common with much philosemitic history, it postures as “history with a warning.” As such, the book opens not with World War I or even the Jews of Tsarist Russia, but with Charlottesville. Hanebrink is concerned by the concept of Judeo-Bolshevism because he believes it never died and that it is undergoing a resurgence not only on the Far Right but in the mainstream. Hanebrink is not alone. British Jewish historian Mark Mazower greeted Hanebrink’s book in November 2018 by writing in the Financial Times: “Paul Hanebrink’s book is a timely reminder of the intellectual tradition deployed by Republican politicians in the US when they join the loose coalition of conspiracy theorists across the Atlantic gleefully demonising George Soros.” Days earlier, another glowing review had appeared in the New York Times, authored by Jewish academic Samuel Moyn. Titled “The Alt-Right’s Favorite Meme is 100 Years Old,” Moyn’s piece argued that “The wider discourse around cultural Marxism today resembles nothing so much as a version of the Judeobolshevik myth updated for a new age.” On February 16th 2019, Jacobin published a brief and turgid piece by a couple of Swedish leftists on “The Return of Judeo-Bolshevism.” As well as being welcomed with open arms by Jewish academics and Marxist webzines, the book has also been greeted with enthusiasm by Britain’s Socialist Workers Party, essentially the remnants of the old British Communist Party. That the book is clearly a boon to Jews and Bolsheviks should presumably have no bearing on our estimation of its objective approach to the concept of Judeo-Bolshevism. But in a field rife with political activism, it certainly raises red flags.

The increase in apologetic propaganda activity in relation to Judeo-Bolshevism is no accident. Clearly Jews have been disturbed by the exponential growth in discussion of cultural Marxism over the last ten years. Although “cultural Marxism” is a different label from “Judeo-Bolshevism,” the curious will not need to investigate the former for long before they are confronted with the multitude of facts relating to the latter. Discussion and awareness of cultural Marxism is growing, and when cultural Marxism is discussed by figures like Tucker Carlson and (much as I dislike him) Jordan Peterson, millions are set on a path that features such landmarks as the Frankfurt School, the massacres of Béla Kun, and the Holodomor. Not everyone will reach those landmarks, but many will, and this is deeply concerning to those seeking to maintain control of the narrative. And so, it is entirely predictable that the establishment machine would stagger into motion, producing material intended to distance Jews from Marxism, and especially from any idea that there have been strong historic links between the two.

In his introduction, Hanebrink castigates nationalists in the United States and Europe for accusing “Jewish Communists” of promoting homosexuality and multiculturalism in their lands, even though Jews are demonstrably leading the migrant-refugee industry and have written openly of their leading role in promoting homosexuality. Even very recently, when the leader of the Washington DC Marxist-Antifa grouping was unmasked by the Daily Caller, there was little surprise at the fact he was a Jew named Joseph Alcoff. Alcoff, whose mother is the “Whiteness Studies” academic activist Linda Alcoff[who once wrote a piece titled “The Whiteness Question” before deleting it — it’s saved here]. Clearly an unhinged fanatic, Joseph Alcoff was arrested a few weeks ago after attacking a couple of Hispanic marines while screaming hysterically that they were “Nazis” and “White supremacists.”

Joseph Alcoff: Judeo-Bolshevik
Joseph Alcoff: Judeo-Bolshevik

The fact that people might be concerned with Jewish Communism today because Jewish Communists like Alcoff are still actively pursuing their agenda doesn’t feature in Hanebrink’s account. Instead, Jewish Communism is presented as more or less a delusion, both past and present. The problem with Hanebrink’s thesis is that it is nowhere proven, or even attempted to be proven, and yet is shot through with claims to total victory over the “myth.” On the fifth page Hanebrink writes:

Again and again, scholars, political liberals, and members of the Jewish community have debunked the claim that “Jews were responsible for Communism.” They have convincingly and authoritatively exposed the “myth of Judeo-Bolshevism” as an ideological construct.

But Hanebrink doesn’t offer a footnote citing any of these supposedly ubiquitous, convincing, and authoritative texts. This is because they don’t exist. The real myth here is therefore “the myth that Jewish Communism has been debunked,” and this is the myth that Hanebrink bases his entire approach on. He continues: “Given this history, the purpose of studying the Judeo-Bolshevik myth must be not to determine how true it is. [p.5]” Yes, he actually wrote that! I actually had to read this sentence three times before reassuring myself this was in fact a sentence published by what remains, for the time being, one of the most respected academic publishing institutions on the planet.

Like Browning, Hanebrink has a very uncomfortable time dealing with statistics. As well as demonstrating an apparent need to place the word ‘overrepresented’ in scare quotes, even when mentioning actual over-representations [p.140], he nervously mentions that between 20 and 40 percent of the Polish Communist Party was Jewish before declaring this a “dry statistic” [p.21] and quickly moving on. Unfortunately, he moves on to the equally awkward instance of trying to combat the idea of Judeo-Bolshevism by arguing pedantically that in 1917 “Jews made up 50 percent of the leadership of the Mensheviks [p.22];” a fact that probably brought little comfort to the Tsar. Hanebrink’s analysis is also woefully superficial. For example, he writes [p.25], that as Jews “turned to Communism, all broke with the Jewish milieu of their grandfathers.” Such a statement sits uneasily alongside statistics that effectively argue for the creation and presence of a new Jewish milieu within Communism, and, as MacDonald shows, continuing strong Jewish identifications among Jewish communists and other leftists. Faced with repeated over-representations of Jews, Hanebrink parries thusly [p.25]: “Useful generalizations are hard to come by.” Are they?

The lack of any discussion of Jewish ethnicity, anywhere in the text, is one of its most glaring failings, and yet it is one, predictably, that Hanebrink again tries to present as a positive. Right at the outset of the book [p.5] he asserts that a consideration of Jewish ethnicity among Communists “requires historians to impose rigid ethnic categories on men and women whose sense of themselves was always more complex and multifaceted.” No, it doesn’t. Most historians are aware of an array of ways of “being Jewish” that don’t require rigid categories but do require an assessment of ethnic identification, ethnic association, and behavior. What Hanebrink is really doing here is providing a kind of multiculturalist excuse for avoiding the explosive topic of Jewish ethnicity in Communism – something that should surely be at the heart of any thesis dealing with conceptions of Judeo-Bolshevism. “I don’t want to label these people” is in this instance the admission: “If I label these people my thesis is doomed.”

An excellent example of evasion along these lines is Hanebrink’s discussion of Béla Kun. Hanebrink argues [p.25] that there was “nothing meaningful at all” about Kun’s Jewish background while elsewhere [p.16] noting that of the 47 people’s commissars gathered by Kun for the 1919 Hungarian Soviet regime, 30 were fellow Jews. Clearly feeling that his own arguments are unconvincing, Hanebrink follows up his earlier surrender on the issue of facts with [p.25]: “Truly understanding the hopes, fears and motivations of any particular Jewish revolutionary in all their irreducible complexity is ultimately a task best undertaken by a biographer.” This is merely yet another capitulation on the issue of Jewish ethnic identity — a subject Hanebrink is simply unprepared and unwilling to address. He even transposes this reluctance into areas that border on the ridiculous. Take, for example, the following [p.25]:

These men and women gravitated toward Bolshevism for the same reasons that so many other Jews in the Russian Empire and across Europe embraced Zionism or assimilationist nationalism: to slip the bonds of traditional communities, to embrace the social and cultural opportunities that modernity offered, or to feel themselves part of the sweep of history.

It’s simply remarkable that an apparently serious scholar could discuss support for Zionism without mentioning Jewish identity, ethnicity, or perceptions of Jewish interests. Jews embraced Zionism, in Hanebrink’s quaint reading, to be “part of the sweep of history.” This is characteristic of the book’s total failure to critically approach the issue of Jewish identity.

Linked to this approach is Hanebrink’s insistence on the strictest possible meaning of Judeo-Bolshevism. As mentioned above, he presents the fact that Jews made up 50 percent of the leadership of the Mensheviks as an argument against the idea of Judeo-Bolshevism — because the Mensheviks and Bolsheviks were fierce rivals. This is nothing more than gross pedantry, because Hanebrink surely must be aware that the term Judeo-Bolshevism was a catch-all term for subversive Jewish leftism, and especially Jewish Communism as a whole, and it ignores the massive Jewish attraction to Bolshevism and their rise to the status of a [hostile] elite after the success of the Bolshevik Revolution. Strangely, throughout the book Hanebrink veers without explanation from strict interpretations like this to more wide-ranging interpretations. For example, he broadly describes the Judeo-Bolshevik elsewhere [p.8] as “an ethno-ideological zealot, a destructive border crosser intent on mobilizing local Jews and other discontented groups to overturn the social and moral order.” This is actually an excellent definition of a Judeo-Bolshevik, but it should be obvious that Jewish Mensheviks can easily fit into it, along with Jewish socialists and liberals. The reality, of course, is that Jews were reliable supporters and partisans for Communism during World War II, a period that witnessed the peak of propaganda against Judeo-Bolshevism. Rather than being a controversial opinion, this is one of the findings of Jewish historian Dov Levin in his Baltic Jews Under the Soviets, 1940–1946 (1994) and The Lesser of Two Evils: Eastern European Jewry Under Soviet Rule, 1939–1941 (1995), as well as a host of histories by other academics. And after World War II, Jews dominated communist governments throughout Eastern Europe.

Perhaps the only remotely valuable element of the book is the sixth chapter, which concerns the shift from Western understandings of Judeo-Bolshevism to the Western trope of “Judeo-Christian” civilization. Hanebrink correctly conceives of the latter as a modern sociological construct designed to place (primarily) American Jews within a “universalist rubric” [p.224] and, later, to promote the pro-Zionist image of a “transatlantic community of values” united against Islam [p.281]. This is itself part of the broader twentieth-century development in which the Jewish Question disappeared from mainstream Western discourse, only to be replaced with the ‘Whiteness’ Question and, most recently, the Islamic Question. I regard this development as one of the most crucial of the twentieth century, and as still requiring full explanation, documentation, and analysis. It goes without saying that Hanebrink doesn’t come close to offering any of these, but I’m so opposed to the terminology of an imagined Jewish-Christian civilization, and wholly presumed shared Jewish-Christian interests, that anything bursting that bubble is bound to win my nod of approval. This is though, in the final analysis, slim reward for a truly terrible piece of work.

Paul Hanebrink’s A Specter Haunting Europe is, ultimately, an extremely strange book, but all too typical of contemporary writing on Jewish history. It is thick on promises and thin in substance. It is characterized by glaring omissions and a deeply insincere analysis accompanied by a cloying philosemitism. Interestingly, the text lacks any semblance of intellectual confidence, and one feels that Hanebrink, who is presumably not himself Jewish, is surely aware of what he is creating: a blatant pro-Jewish apologetic. The reasons why a White academic might want to produce something like this are not difficult to surmise. As with Christopher Browning, such endeavors are massively incentivized. Despite being unoriginal, low on facts, and poor in analysis, Hanebrink, associate professor of history at Rutgers, has written a book published by a prestigious academic publisher (perhaps the most prestigious) and has been lavishly praised in the major organs of the mainstream media. The message from our latter-day commissars is clear: “Sell out and we’ll make you a star.”

Notes

[1] G. Langmuir, History, Religion and Antisemitism (Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1990), 15.

[2] Ibid, 13.

[3] Ibid, 275.

[4] Ibid, 19 & 67.

[5] Ibid, 265.

[6] Michael Murras, Vichy France and the Jews (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1981), p.183.

[7] Mark Roodhouse, Black Market Britain, 1939-1955 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013), p. 159.

[8] Ibid, p. 234.

[9] Marsha Rozenblit and Jonathan Karp, World War I and the Jews: Conflict and Transformation in Europe, the Middle East and America (New York: Berghahn, ), p.36.

[10] Ibid, p.37.

[11] André Gerrits, The Myth of Jewish Communism: A Historical Interpretation (Brussels: PIE Peter Lang, 2009).

[12] Eliezer Ben-Rafael, “André Gerrits, The Myth of Jewish Communism: A Historical Interpretation,” International Sociology Review of Books, Volume: 26 issue: 2, pp, 260-263, p.260.

(Republished from The Occidental Observer by permission of author or representative)
 
Hide 360 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. Rational says:

    A SPECTRE HAUNTING THE WORLD—JEWISH MENTAL ILLNESS.

    Thanks for the good article, Sir.

    As your article indicates, the Judaists have a good scam of trying to project the disgust and revulsion of others’ at their barbaric behaviors into an attack on the victims, by calling them irrational “anti-semites”.

    Their claim that Anti-Semitism was a uniquely Western and Christian phenomena is false. It appears to be, because that is where the Jewish cancer flourished.

    For example, a sexomaniac Jewish woman, Wendy Doniger, posing as an “Indologist” tried to project the sexual depravity in the Torah and in her life onto Indian religious texts, to a degree indicating that she is mentally ill.

    The Indians issued an arrest warrant against the publisher(s) and had her books destroyed!

    https://wideawakegentile.wordpress.com/2015/09/03/the-jews-an-alternate-history/

    https://wideawakegentile.wordpress.com/2014/02/13/interpret-this-wendy-doniger/

    The world’s #1 problem is not the Ugly American, it is the Ugly Jew, going around the world and showing off his/her depravity and gutter culture.

  2. Another good dissection of the fairy tale of “innocent Jews” and Auntie Shem-it-ism when it comes to communism. Ironically (or not), the same could be done for the destructive “Jewish capitalism”, better known as banksterism, under which we suffer today. Both communism and capitalism have the same goal – concentration of wealth into the hands of an elite few. While different methods are used, in many ways, they are alike. The Politburo had its wannabes and useful idiots just as the Fed does. Kissing enough ass (or something else) will move you on to bigger and better things. Step out of line, and you will be crushed.
    Capitalism and communism: the two sides of a Jewish coin.

    • Replies: @anon
  3. On point article man.

    It is funny how the Jews and philosemites try their absolute hardest to avoid the facts and when they can’t they try to explain it as anti-semitism for why Jews did it. It’s always the goyim and never the innocent and passive Jews who have never done anything to anybody, but somehow managed to be expelled by over 100 countries over a vast period of time and land.

    • Replies: @DanFromCt
  4. I’d like to know how they sold Bolshevism so successfully in the Confederate states ninety years ago.

    But then, those folks also voted for Prohibition and entry into WWI. A couple of their senators pleaded with Wilson that he exempt Negroes from the draft.

    Send only white boys to die.

  5. As well as receiving over $30,000 from Deborah Lipstadt to testify against David Irving.

    Except Browning didn’t actually testify, but submitted an expert report in lieu of his testimony, so Irving was not allowed to cross-examine him.

    • Replies: @Wally
    , @Henry's Cat
  6. Mr Joyce has written a very good article. He successfully debunks the view that any links between communism & Jews is a myth. It is not a myth.
    However, it is a very complex issue. The urge to simply make “communist” & “Jew” synonyms should be resisted.
    There are numerous reasons why Jews should be attracted to socialism: not least it’s emphasis on secular, universal & egalitarian values. Of course, such values appealed to goys also.
    The Jewish/communist issue needs to address certain questions.
    Firstly, what type of Jew was attracted to communism ? The Jewish intelligensia were clearly attracted, but what of working & middle class jews ? To what degree were such Jews self consciously “Jewish” ? Were they secular ? Were they active or sympathetic to their “community” or essentially excluded, happily or not ?
    Secondly, what were the attitudes of communists to Jew’s ? Undoubtedly, antisemitism amongst communists waxed & waned around time & place.
    None of these questions detract from Joyce’s valuable article, but they do require answers (which I don’t have) to fill out our understanding of this contentious issue….(of course, ALL Jewish questions are contentious).

  7. El Dato says:
    @animalogic

    There are numerous reasons why Jews should be attracted to socialism: not least it’s emphasis on secular, universal & egalitarian values.

    One needs to drill deeper here because this sounds like the same set of values inherent in old-school liberalism.

    However, in “socialism”, one gets to make sure everyone is ultimately on the same sadass level while pretending to be all a happy family as someone holds a gun to your head.

    Murray Rothbard was very perceptive;

    Karl Marx as Religious Eschatologist

    Marxism is a religious creed. This statement has been common among critics of Marx, and since Marxism is an explicit enemy of religion, such a seeming paradox would offend many Marxists, since it clearly challenged the allegedly hard-headed scientific materialism on which Marxism rested. In the present day, oddly enough, an age of liberation theology and other flirtations between Marxism and the Church, Marxists themselves are often quick to make this same proclamation.

    Certainly, one obvious way in which Marxism functions as a religion is the lengths to which Marxists will go to preserve their system against obvious errors or fallacies. Thus, when Marxian predictions fail even though they are allegedly derived from scientific laws of history, Marxists go to great lengths to change the terms of the original prediction.

    A notorious example is Marx’s law of the impoverishment of the working class under capitalism. When it became all too clear that the standard of living of the workers under industrial capitalism was rising instead of falling, Marxists fell back on the view that what Marx “really” meant by impoverishment was not immiseration but relative deprivation. One of the problems with this fallback defense is that impoverishment is supposed to be the motor of the proletarian revolution, and it is difficult to envision the workers resorting to bloody revolution because they only enjoy one yacht apiece while capitalists enjoy five or six.

  8. nik1975 says:
    @El Dato

    I would love to agree with everything written in the comments section… however some people are perhaps a little unfamiliar with works by Karl Marx. A usual oversight seeing as most people believe they understand Marx without having read anything he wrote.

    Heres the thing… Marx simply delineated a system and language in order to describe society. He differentiates and postulates using the methods that he delineated and simply used and promoted a certain language to be used in the description of societies. That his philosophy became political is simply an extension of the use of this type of modelling of society.

    The term Marxist then is highly misleading because anyone who uses his language and model to describe society is a marxist. They donot however all have anywhere near the same political ideology.

    Marxists are mot one set or group… marxism is a faculty of sociology

  9. anon[125] • Disclaimer says:

    “Even before the crisis of 1918–1919, which combined the experiences of defeat and revolution for many Europeans, Jews were invariably disproportionately represented in liberal and socialist parties because they were not welcome to participate in conservative and Catholic political parties. ”

    Yes. Very true. I can’t join Capitalism society or Jewish friend of Conservatism or create a Jewish Friend of Conservatism club I Socialism society and joined Jewish Friend of Labor and created a Jewish Friend of Labor society.

    I dont have any principle . Who needs that ? We create principles .

    I couldn’t join the online Dating for straight , so I joined the online dating for the Homosexual – nobody asked me here if I abused anybody from the opposite sex. My principle is just a new and another version of my needs for the moment .

    • Replies: @joeshittheragman
  10. Mulegino1 says:

    Judeo-Bolshevism is one avenue of practical Talmudism for international Jewry, another is usury based finance capitalism, yet another is multiculturalism and still another globalism. Although outwardly distinct, they are in reality one big Antichrist engine for what they call “Tikkun Olam”, which is essentially all the gentiles of the earth being herded as Jew cattle- of course under the pretext of “world peace” and “justice” —under Antichrist/Djall/Mosiach in the final worldwide dystopia.

    The aforementioned movements and ideologies, along with their countless tributaries, represent the order of battle in the giant metaphysical war which Jewry and its shabbos goyim in the ancillary secret societies have been waging against humanity since its inception in the first century AD, when the Christian Church was instituted and the religion of the Talmud and Rabbinism (direct ancestor of contemporary Judaism) was formed to counter Christianity.

    The Jewish spirit is anti-nature, anti-truth, and anti-life. In opposing the Divine Logos, it sealed its fate as a mere rejectionist and ultimately destructive cult.

  11. This reads like a John Hagee sermon. Hagee seems to think that there is some imaginary communist threat to us, he is pro-Israel to the bone, pro-war, pro imperialism, and says socialism will destroy America. I will assume the opposite is true since he is a liar of the worst kind. I think there is only a warmongering oligarch threat.

    You can’t tie “Jews” exclusively to the left or right. You can’t tie them exclusively to communism, capitalism, or any other ideal. They play both sides of the field. There are good and bad on both.

    I honestly don’t even like calling them “Jews”. Its like calling them Semites. They’re neither. They are simply evil, rich white dudes hiding behind a religion to escape criticism for their evil deeds.

    I’ll go with the side that is anti-war, protects the poor and middle class from the super rich, and doesn’t rob us blind without giving us anything in return. The capitalist system certainly does neither. Neither party in America does either. Both the Democrats and Republicans are imperialists and serve the rich.

    I haven’t lived in a communist country, so I can’t personally speak of it. I know theres lots of disinfo on the topic. But I find it telling that the Soviet Union (communist) overwhelmingly sided with the Arabs in the Israel-Arab wars. Or that Americas oligarchy (Jews) as well as the Israelis have always aimed to destroy all communist countries, Vietnam, N Korea, Cuba, Latin America, etc…….
    The N Koreans are known to hand out Mein Kamph to all their soldiers. So that doesn’t fit the Jewish-communist narrative. All of the communist-socialist countries support the Palestinians over the Israelis, Chavez/Maduro in Venezuela, Morales in Bolivia, Castro in Cuba are all pro-Palestinian.

    Does’t make sense to me to say that communism is somehow exclusively a Jewish thing when all of the communists hate Israel, and ZOG America and Israel hate all the communists.

    Its ironic that capitalists point the finger at communists accusing them of killing off Christians when it is America/Europe that has damn near eradicated the entire Christian population of Iraq and Syria, some of the oldest Christian communities on the planet. Support the the ethnic cleansing and genocide of Palestinians including Christians, the decedents of Jesus, and destroying the birth place of Jesus.

    The only threat I see are rich people. Capitalists. I don’t know of any communists with 1000 military bases all over the world, terrorizing folks with drones and nukes.

    Revealed – the capitalist network that runs the world
    https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg21228354-500-revealed-the-capitalist-network-that-runs-the-world/

    Dispelling 12 Myths about the Bolshevik Revolution – Fort Russ
    https://www.fort-russ.com/2017/11/dispelling-12-myths-about-bolshevik/
    Holodomor Hoax: The Anatomy of a Lie Invented by West’s Propaganda Machine
    https://sputniknews.com/politics/201510191028730561-holodomor-hoax-invented-hitler-west/
    Holodomor Hoax: Joseph Stalin’s Crime That Never Took Place
    https://sputniknews.com/politics/201508091025560345/

  12. anon[125] • Disclaimer says:
    @redmudhooch

    Does’t make sense to me to say that communism is somehow exclusively a Jewish thing when all of the communists hate Israel, .”

    Thats now .Not in 1920 or 30 or 1940 or even 1948 .

    • Replies: @Anon
    , @the grand wazoo
  13. Ron Unz says:

    Well, I haven’t read the book, but pretty much all contemporary observers agreed that the top Bolshevik leadership was 80% or more Jewish, and a few years ago Putin confirmed the same thing in an interview with an Israeli newspaper.

    Since Russia’s population at the time was only about 4% Jewish, Jews were over-represented among the leading Bolsheviks by something like 10,000%. Offhand, an over-representation of 10,000% seems pretty “statistically significant” to me.

    I discussed some of these things and various related matters in a long article last year:

    http://www.unz.com/runz/american-pravda-the-bolshevik-revolution-and-its-aftermath/

    • Agree: DESERT FOX
  14. @Rational

    Using words like “cancer” doesn’t help.

  15. @Mulegino1

    Sounds like E. Michael Jones level daftness.

    Makes me think you’re one of those super-tricky kind of hasbara trolls who deliberately go way over the top just to make the Unz comment section look bad. Stop it.

    • Replies: @Jake
    , @follyofwar
    , @Felix Culpa
  16. Wally says:
    @Felix Krull

    BTW, this Paul Hanebrink is also an ‘Associate Professor of Jewish Studies’ at Rutgers University. He knows who butters his bread. Hardly an unbiased source of information.
    The mentioned Christoper Browning, arch Zionist and part of the profitable “Holocaust Industry”, is just another shyster who has been busted on his impossible “holocaust” nonsense every step of the way .
    – Christopher Browning describes the fake “holocaust” as:

    a program aimed at murdering every last Jew in the German grasp

    Yet there are countless so called “survivors” who were in their “grasp”.
    – Browning savaged here: Christopher Browning and the “Nazi Gas Chambers” of Belzec: https://codoh.com/library/document/962/?lang=en
    – Browning said of Eichmann’s travels:

    “through Lemberg, where he witnessed blood spouting in little geysers from a mass grave”

    see more on these laughable “geysers”: https://codoh.com/search/?sorting=relevance&q=geysers+of+blood
    Revisionist Brian Renk demolishes ‘historian’ Browning: https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=611
    – And to pile on, here lot’s more on this true shyster: https://codoh.com/search/?sorting=relevance&q=christopher+browning

    http://www.codoh.com

  17. This still doesn’t explain why Jews were so successful in mobilising the masses in various nations to their socialist, communist, Menshevik, Bolshevik causes. Obviously the masses accepted that these Jews, by becoming communists, had become atheists and internationalists and hence no longer Jews.

    Also this association between Jews and communism, although it is true that most of the communist leaders were Jews in Russia and Eastern Europe, discredits the ideas of socialism and communism, which have been popular in many other countries throughout the world with little or no Jewish presence or leadership.

    And now that the socialist and communist ideas have been replaced by the worst kind of neo-liberal capitalism in Russia and Eastern Europe, again under the overwhelming influence of Jewish oligarchs and their western Jewish financiers and collaborators, very few people there are blaming the evils of their communist past on the Jews but instead on the ideas of socialism and communism. So you can inveigh against the communists but if you condemn the Jews for it you’ll be accused of anti-semitism. And those same communist Jews have now privatised most of the industries into their own hands and have declared themselves capitalists.

    And it’s all well and fine saying that communism and capitalism are two sides of the same coin, and so are Nazism and Zionism, and there was indeed a coin minted in pre-WWII Hitler’s National Socialist Germany to prove this:

    https://i1.wp.com/hollowhoax.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/mogv-part-12-2278-coin-minted-to-honor-the-joint-nazi-zionist-effort.jpg?resize=500%2C280&ssl=1

    but it just reinforces the idea of these all-powerful Jews who control everything, and it could well be a good description of the state of the world, but you find a way out of it and tell me.

    • Replies: @annamaria
    , @anon
  18. Alfred says:

    Anytime I read the phrase “Judeo-Christian”, I understand that the writer is a Zionist who is trying to ingratiate himself and mislead his readers.

    The truth is that there is far more reality to the notion of “Judeo-Islamic”. Christianity was created in contradiction to Judaism. Islam is a further development of Judaism.

  19. Tyrion 2 says:

    The entire programme of the K-Mac cult summarised:

    “Jews = the reasons for my political and personal failings. I am therefore innocent and morally virtuous.”

    Why are you all so desperate to claim a position of total passivity?

    People give their dogs more agency than you give yourselves.

  20. @Reg Cæsar

    I’d like to know how they sold Bolshevism so successfully in the Confederate states ninety years ago.

    Simple enough. Byproduct of Black slavery and remnant Black populations. It is said that slavery’s worst effect is on the slave holders. Let’s look at a particular instance of that old saying.

    People can’t communicate abstractions over about a 20 IQ range (test: jokes aren’t funny), although they can conduct commercial and force based transactions over a larger IQ range. The necessity of communicating with and inspiring obedience from the bulk of the population limits the ruling class to a maximum mean IQ of population average plus 10. So, for an average IQ of 100, max ruling class average IQ is 110. John von Neuman stayed out of politics for a reason, and Jensen would have been better off if he’d done the same.

    But suppose that half the population has an IQ of 85. What then? Well, in that case, the ruling class is limited to an IQ of less than 100. A little bit of simulation shows that the result is a slightly skewed Normal distribution with a mean of about 92 and standard distribution of about 16. A ruling class IQ of between 90 and 95 can thus communicate about 80% of the population (1 significant figure) but has very limited ability to communicate with IQ over 100 or 105. The actual situation may be worse, as a basic agricultural society tends to have lower IQ (perhaps from a sort of inverse Flynn effect — no real need for extensive work with abstractions on a subsistence farm). The “100” above should, perhaps, be a lower figure.

    Need I point out similar effects on the Democratic Party?

    This accounts for a good deal of the really idiotic decisions made by Southern leadership over the years, in my opinion. Chalk up yet another reason not to enslave people.

    Counterinsurgency

    • Replies: @Counterinsurgency
  21. @El Dato

    it is difficult to envision the workers resorting to bloody revolution because they only enjoy one yacht apiece while capitalists enjoy five or six.

    In fact, it proved easier to view the converse [1]. Pohl wrote a novella, “The Man Who Ate the World”, one of a series about a society in which consumption was mandatory to avoid a recession. Everybody had a ration book, and had to use up or wear out or eat specific items, that or be demoted and have to consume even more. The objective was apparently to avoid “recession” by boosting demand. The scheme was not a lot different from 1950s Keynesian economics except in rigor.
    The man who ate the world was trying far to hard to accept his role in society, and was consuming so much that even automated factories could not supply him. He was cured by a psychotherapist who use childhood regression.

    I’d say the story was an early attempt to discredit the West’s ability to produce consumer goods, but it was quite the allegory, and surprisingly similar to what the Democratic radicals (and many Republicans) are still saying today: “We can do anything we set our mind to, so the real decisions are not about _how_ we do things, but about _what_ we will do”. Postmodernists in particular really believe that a “man who ate the world” society is possible if they simply beat the technoserfs hard enough.

    No idea so hare brained that somebody won’t run with it.

    Counterinsurgency

    1] Frederick Pohl.
    _The Man who Ate the World_
    https://books.google.com/books?id=RtltMQEACAAJ&dq=the+man+who+ate+the+world&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwi95qfljejgAhWF6oMKHcYAA0IQ6AEILjAB

  22. Sencha McRae did two nice lectures on the topic.
    I like her approach citing from contemporary sources of the time.

    The entire “debunking” crumbles with one sentecne uttered by Abe Foxman, when his delegation of criminals visit Ukraine, and they brazenly demand the Ukrainians not to mention the jewish hand in bolshevism. Giant chutzpah in Ukraine.
    The documentary “Defamation” by Israeli Yoav Shamir is a pretty good document of jewish behaviour. It also shows how ruthless the jews brainwash their children as well. Sickening.

  23. Seraphim says:
    @animalogic

    @what of working & middle class jews ?

    Since the thrust of the talk is the role of Jews in the Russian revolution one must talk of:
    “The General Jewish Labour Bund in Lithuania, Poland and Russia (Yiddish: אַלגעמײַנער ײדישער אַרבעטער בּונד אין ליטע פוילין און רוסלאַנד‎, Algemeyner Yidisher Arbeter Bund in Litah, Poyln un Rusland), generally called The Bund (Yiddish: בונד‎, cognate to German: Bund, meaning federation or union) or the Jewish Labour Bund, was a secular Jewish socialist party in the Russian Empire, active between 1897 and 1920. In 1917 the Polish part of the Bund, which dated to the times when Poland was a Russian territory, seceded from the Russian Bund and created a new Polish General Labor Bund which continued to operate in Poland in the years between the two world wars…

    “In 1921, the Communist Bund dissolved itself and its members sought admission to the Communist Party [Bolshevik]. As of 1923, the last Bundist groups had ceased to function in Soviet Russia. Many former Bundists, like Mikhail Liber and David Petrovsky, perished during Stalin’s purges in the 1930s. The Polish Bundists continued their activities until 1948. During the latter half of the 20th century the Bundist legacy was represented through the International Jewish Labor Bund, a federation of local Bundist groups around the world…

    “The International Jewish Labor Bund was a New York-based international Jewish socialist organization, based on the legacy of the General Jewish Labour Bund founded in the Russian empire in 1897 and the Polish Bund that was active in the interwar years. The IJLB is composed by local Bundist groups around the world. It was an “associated organisation” of the Socialist International, similar in status to the World Labour Zionist Movement or the International League of Religious Socialists.The World Coordinating Council/Committee of the Jewish Labor Bund was dissolved in New York in the mid-2000s, although local Bundist groups or groups inspired by the Jewish Labor Bund still exist in France, the UK, Australia and the State of Israel…

    “As a Marxist party, its central priority was organizing the Jewish working class”.

  24. Benjy says:

    Over the centuries a large part of Jewish culture has devolved into a tribal game of deception. Jews living in European lands have always had two completely different persona, one for use around goyim and one for the tribe. This cultural split personality is one reason why jews often make good actors and good spies. In my Christian family the worst punishment came when you lied to my father or anyone who would tell him you had lied. In Jewish families the children observe their parents deceitful split personalities from their first moments of consciousness.

    One way this cultural predisposition for deception manifests itself is with family names. Jews have been changing names for centuries, and we can be certain it was to hide their jewishness. Legitimate children of female jews would bear their gentile fathers names, Bastard jews of jewish fathers likely would end up with a gentile’s name too. So the vast majority of single parent children would have ended up with a gentile name, even if there were strong connections to a patronizing jewish family. Alexander Hamilton and even Hitler are rumored to be the spawn of such jews. These bastard children of jews often make their best agents, and we know from all the political assassinations across Europe over the last couple of centuries have been organized and often performed by such agents.

    Then we have jews who deliberately change their names to hide their jewishness. Lev Davidovich Bronstein, aka Leon Trotsky, was one of these. Think of all the jews who took on glittery German names: Rothschild (Red Shield), Engels (Angel), Rosenfeld (Field of Roses), Goldman (Man of Gold). Each of these jewish families created elaborate European shields of honor to further hide their jewishness from the goyim.

    There are also plain old crypto-jews. Conversos, Mariscos, you name it. Jews who have been pretending to be Christians for centuries. With Malice.

    All of these groups I would lump into “crypto-jew”. So when someone says “40% of communists were jews”, what they are really saying is the “40% of communist were self acknowledged jews”. If we compare the proportion of hidden to open jews in politics or show business, my guess is that there are as many crypto-jews as there are jews.

    Another example of crypto-jews performing nefarious deeds is in the comments section here at Unz. They lurk around doing exactly what Dr. Joyce describes:

    avoid the facts, downplay them if concession is absolutely necessary, and move the discussion into abstractions and sophistry.

    We’re again in very familiar territory: when you feel you can’t avoid a fact (“Jews were invariably disproportionately represented”), and you can’t downplay it, then explain it by way of prejudice (“they were not welcome”). The problem with snapshots of history like this, as I’ve explained many times before, is what I’ve come to term a “cropped timeline explanation” — something that is extremely common in all Jewish and philosemitic historiography concerning anti-Semitism. When faced with an uncomfortable and unavoidable fact involving Jewish behavior (Leftism, usury, financial crime, pornography, etc.) one starts with assumptions of anti-Jewish prejudice and works from there.

  25. fnn says:
    @redmudhooch

    https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2019/02/28/jewish-attitudes-toward-free-speech-whats-good-for-the-jews/

    During the 1950s, the organized Jewish community consistently opposed measures intended to make it more difficult for communists to operate within the American system even as it officially opposed communism. For example, Jewish organizations objected to any infringements of civil liberties or academic freedom enacted to firm up national security. Jews were also vastly overrepresented in high-profile cases among those invoking the Fifth Amendment right not to incriminate oneself, so that public hearings like Sen. Joe McCarthy’s inevitably highlighted the Jewish role in communism. For example, in 1952, of 124 people questioned by the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Government Affairs, Weingarten identifies 79 Jews, 32 non-Jews and 13 with unknown ethnicity. All invoked the Fifth.

    Even more remarkably, of the 42 people who were dismissed from their positions at the Fort Monmouth Laboratories in New Jersey on suspicion of constituting a spy ring (the same one that Julius Rosenberg belonged to), 39 were Jews and one other was married to a Jewish woman.

    • Agree: mark green
  26. Sean says:

    Ordinary Men: Reserve Police Battalion 101 and the Final Solution in Poland (1992), contains the less than remarkable thesis that war turns ordinary men into killers,

    According to Gerd Gigerenzer the book shows the men participated in a massacre of women., children and elderly (Jews) that their commander said they could opt out of, in spite of it horrifying and sickening them, because they would not break ranks. So it was peer pressure that made them killers.

    • Replies: @RegretLeft
  27. @anon

    Jewish Friend of Labor
    ——————–
    What’s a” Jewish friend of labor?” That’s one of the big problems with Jews, they’ve never been known to put their hand to honest work in all their history.

    • Replies: @lavoisier
  28. @nik1975

    A convincing argument. Of what?

  29. Seraphim says:
    @animalogic

    @what of working & middle class jews ?

    Since the thrust of the talk is the role of Jews in the Russian revolution one must talk of:
    “The General Jewish Labour Bund in Lithuania, Poland and Russia (Yiddish: אַלגעמײַנער ײדישער אַרבעטער בּונד אין ליטע פוילין און רוסלאַנד‎, Algemeyner Yidisher Arbeter Bund in Litah, Poyln un Rusland), generally called The Bund (Yiddish: בונד‎, cognate to German: Bund, meaning federation or union) or the Jewish Labour Bund, was a secular Jewish socialist party in the Russian Empire, active between 1897 and 1920. In 1917 the Polish part of the Bund, which dated to the times when Poland was a Russian territory, seceded from the Russian Bund and created a new Polish General Labor Bund which continued to operate in Poland in the years between the two world wars…

    “In 1921, the Communist Bund dissolved itself and its members sought admission to the Communist Party [Bolshevik]. As of 1923, the last Bundist groups had ceased to function in Soviet Russia. Many former Bundists, like Mikhail Liber and David Petrovsky, perished during Stalin’s purges in the 1930s. The Polish Bundists continued their activities until 1948. During the latter half of the 20th century the Bundist legacy was represented through the International Jewish Labor Bund, a federation of local Bundist groups around the world…

    “The International Jewish Labor Bund was a New York-based international Jewish socialist organization, based on the legacy of the General Jewish Labour Bund founded in the Russian empire in 1897 and the Polish Bund that was active in the interwar years. The IJLB is composed by local Bundist groups around the world. It was an “associated organisation” of the Socialist International, similar in status to the World Labour Zionist Movement or the International League of Religious Socialists.The World Coordinating Council/Committee of the Jewish Labor Bund was dissolved in New York in the mid-2000s, although local Bundist groups or groups inspired by the Jewish Labor Bund still exist in France, the UK, Australia and the State of Israel…

    “As a Marxist party, its central priority was organizing the Jewish working class”.

  30. Parfois1 says:

    Good point: why there is a lack of analytical discussions around the Judeobolshevism duality? Why conflate Jews and Communism as a singular theme when in fact there are two distinct and separate elements. Yes, the Jews were overrepresented in the revolutionary movements and socialist state institutions. But the question should be asked: were they in it for the sake of the pro;etariat or just joined the bandwagon for the sake of acquiring political ascendency and power for themselves?

    This is a valid question considering the fact that Jewish participation in other parties was also impressive as if running several horses in the race to guarantee victory. If you bother to read more about such types as Lev Bronstein and his mentor Alexander Parvus, you soon realise that they were not communist as such, only parasitic freeloaders to enrich themselves and their tribe. Notice also that the Jewish members of the party apparatus had their own club/faction and separate meetings.

    Lenin himself recognized the uncomfortable reality of too many Jews in the Central Committee and Commissariat, but it reflected the sad fact that there were not enough ethnic Russians to fill the cadres after the revolution. He summarised the situation when he quipped: “Show me a literate Russian and I see a Jew”. Eventually Stalin started the groundwork to remove Jews from the leadership (e.g. introduction of quota system in education and government) but his sudden death put an end to the reforms.

  31. @redmudhooch

    Holodomor Hoax: The Anatomy of a Lie Invented by West’s Propaganda Machine

    That was a joke, right? The author is obviously a latter day Walter Duranty, with the writing style and grasp of the facts of a 12 year old. It is in fact, a good example of what Andrew Joyce is writing about, and as such is a waste of time. It’s not even worth refuting his “points,” all of which are mere claims.

    You can fool most of the time, but not all of us all of the time.

    • Replies: @jacques sheete
    , @Wally
  32. anon[393] • Disclaimer says:
    @Curmudgeon

    It does seem to be true jewish capitalists and communists not only dont fear each other they support each other this is remarkably like a good cop bad cop dialectic assault

    • Agree: Beefcake the Mighty
    • Replies: @jacques sheete
  33. anon[393] • Disclaimer says:
    @Tyrion 2

    Never followed this argument first it pretends all jewish critics are failures which is not true according to jews all whites are anti semites and whites are clearly not a failing people.

    But more to the point it says to recognize one has an enemy, to study the enemies tactics, even acknowledge an enemies victories, is to what exactly? Supposedly its not the rational response to an attack but often compared to negro victimology. But negros are a useless people that live off whites and seek to make themselves feel better and get more free shit by proclaiming that whitey did them wrong and owes them. This negro tactic is much more like the jew tactic crying racism and insisting the white man owes him. If whites are indeed so mean to jews they should have left a thousand years ago we dont owe you a safe space within our nation’s you dont get to invade then whine about the conditions. The Kmac as you call it is simply whites saying we have these problems with our civilization that seem intractable and we find behind them are jews working surreptitiously this is what they did this is how this is how they hide it, now we have identified the problem and the problem makers we can do something about it because you cant solve a problem if you don’t study it.
    No all this jewish complaint about jewish criticism is really just jews trying to be left alone to do their mischief which in large part is openly subverting white nations cultures because it benefits them. Whites unlike any other people seem to have evolved to be people of the idea we organize less around genes than around ideas, thus we are loath to defend against people organized against us as a people instead arguing with ideas. It makes us quite vulnerable in this smaller world we whites have created.Jews are well aware having studied us carefully they understand how to exploit our cuckiness. If they really just wanted to settle down and live not conquer us they would have assimilated a thousand years ago but they wont even in the past hundred years since they became non religious even intermarry yet remain anti white jews like say smollett

  34. lavoisier says: • Website
    @joeshittheragman

    Is working long hours day in and day out as a physician considered honest and hard work?

    How about starting and running your own business?

    Sure, the financial fraudsters do not work hard for their money, but it is quite an overstatement to say that Jews do not know how to work hard or that none of them are employed in honest work.

    In my experience they work VERY hard.

    • Agree: Hibernian
    • Replies: @Jake
    , @anarchyst
  35. Jake says:

    What is Christopher Browning’s background, his ancestry? Where was he raised and by whom and with what religious affiliation? For whom did parents and grandparents and great-grandparents work? How were they educated and where?

    I know only that he is an Oberlin graduate and Wisconsin-Madison PhD. The former was either the 1st or 2nd college to admit and graduate both women and blacks. It was from its origin an intended mesh of low church WASPism in its standard Liberal form of the northern states by the Antebellum era with the low church forms of Continental Germanic Protestantism, which also had become quite Liberal in cultural and theological terms. Oberlin was founded in the Connecticut Western Reserve part of OH, which was planted with 100% pure New England WASPs (many of whom had stopped over for
    spell in the Burnt Over District of upstate UP, which had been filled with pure New England WASPs, who immediately produced local cultures of endless wild-eyed Liberalism).

    Wisconsin-Madison is a perfect example of the state U version of the same ethno-cultural assimilation: Yank WASPs plant and merge, very quickly (not in terms of the same church structure, but of identity and cultural politics) with new Germanic Protestant immigrants. And those politics would be Liberal, for every era, and out of every locale. The German 1848ers, those who fled the failed 1848 communistic revolution for America rather than face the music back home, made the upper midwestern WASP/Continental Germanic culture even more violently Liberal, but the 1848ers did not create that Liberalism, nor its self-righteously violent attitude.

    How deep into that culture of Yank WASP/Continental Germanic anti-Christendom radicalism are the roots, religious as well as genetic, of Christopher Browning?

    • Agree: Cleburne
    • Replies: @Anon
  36. Communism, nothing more than Judaism for the Goy…

    “First of all, we have to understand what communism is. I mean, to me, real communism, the Soviet communism, is basically a mask for Bolshevism, which is a mask for Judaism.” -Bobby Fischer

  37. Jake says:
    @Emblematic

    Says the guy who sounds like an SPLC or ADL or John Hagee shill.

  38. @Alfred

    I’m not in favour of associating Judaism with Christianity and describing the modern western world thus.

    Judeo-Masonic is a far better descriptor of the west as there’s very little that’s Christian about it.

  39. @jacques sheete

    Should have read, “You can fool most most of the goyim most of the time, but not all of us all of the time.”

  40. @Reg Cæsar

    The Bolshevist were in the the North my friend with Lincoln’s “Red Republican’s”
    https://attackthesystem.com/2012/05/15/red-republicans-and-lincolns-marxists-marxism-in-the-civil-war/

    As to why the South lost the war, you need look no further than their house Jew, Judah P. Benjamin.
    http://tomatobubble.com/id866.html

    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar
  41. @Tyrion 2

    Why are you all so desperate to claim a position of total passivity?

    Dunno.

    Why are you all so desperate to claim a position of total and eternal victim-hood and innocence??

  42. @Benjy

    Yes, I agree there are far more Jews around than we suspect. My favourite Jewish name is of one Wilhelm Reich, no less, the first name of a German emperor and the surname the German word for empire. Figure that.

    • Replies: @Benjy
  43. @Parfois1

    …you soon realise that they were not communist as such…

    The prominent ones were no doubt opportunistic parasites who found it convenient to hitch their wagons to the Red movement with its populist messages (ala tRump today), but there apparently were plenty of idealistic gulls below that, e.g., members of the kibbutzim. Plenty of flip-floppers among both groups too.

  44. Communism is a Zionist creation and the Russian Revolution was a Zionist creation and most of the leaders were Zionists sent into Russia to start the revolution and most of the money came from the Zionist banking cabal in New York City to do the REGIME CHANGE and the Zionists still are doing REGIME CHANGE and murdering millions as they did in Russia!

    Check Anthony Suttons book Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution and Alexander Solzhenitsyns Gulag Archipelago!

  45. @anon

    It does seem to be true jewish capitalists and communists not only dont fear each other they support each other …

    True.

    Whitaker Chambers, Bella Dodd and Elizabeth Bentley, all ex-Commies, to name just three, are good sources of info in that regard.

  46. nickels says:

    The nineteenth century gives him [jew] a dominant position within the peoples’ economy, due to the expansion of capital loans, founded on the concept of interest. Via the detour of stock, he finally obtains possession of a large portion of the production facilities, and with the help of the stock exchange he gradually becomes ruler not only of public economic life but ultimately also political life. He supports this domination with the intellectual degradation of the peoples, assisted by Freemasonry and the work of the press which has become dependent upon him. He discovers in the newly rising fourth estate of the working class the potential force to destroy the bourgeois intellectual regime, just as the bourgeoisie was once the instrument to shatter feudal rule. Bourgeois stupidity, a shocking lack of principle, greed, and cowardice play into his hands in this. He formed the laborers’ occupation into a special class, which he now asks to take up the fight against the national intelligentsia. Marxism becomes the intellectual father of the Bolshevik Revolution. It is the weapon of terror that the Jew now applies ruthlessly and brutally.

    https://historyportal.co.il/index.php?option=com_dropfiles&format=&task=frontfile.download&catid=105&id=0B8N_miZ5v857a0gtNkhIeGh2SVk&Itemid=1000000000000

    • Replies: @jacques sheete
  47. Jake says:
    @Ron Unz

    Even the Kadets, who were far more reasonable and less insanely murderous than either Bolsheviks or Mensheviks, had a leadership that was at least a third Jewish.

    Quite simply, if you took out all Jewish leaders of the various Liberal and Leftist organizations operating in Russia in 1914 and also all Jewish money used to operate those groups, there would have been seemingly ZERO desire to have any Revolution and very little demand for a reform as radical as a Constitutional Monarchy.

    Yes, there was by then a long history of Russian revolutionaries acting violently, and every one of them was part of a group disproportionately led and financed by Jews.

    And then there is the source of Russian revolutionary activity that was not fully Jewish tied, but was strongly Jewish influenced. The Decembrist revolt was due primarily to the influence of Freemasonry (an English, a WASP, invention that would spark revolutionary fire not merely across all of Europe eventually but even to binge the necessary main source for Mexican revolution), which steered some young and idealistic military officers to think in terms of a universal brotherhood of equality transcending nations and religions. And Freemasonry denied its Jewish ties any time after the 1780s is simply criminally insane.

    Jewishness is always going to be anti-Western and anti-white Gentile. The reason is Christ. Christendom was founded and administered by white men. To overcome Christendom, and bury its remains, would ‘prove’ to Christ-hating Jews that Jesus was either a lying, self-hating Jew traitor to his Chosen Race or that the people Jesus allowed to be His were worthless.

    Of course, Jews can accomplish none of that without apostates from historic Christianity and Christendom. In fact, such apostates guarantee, are necessary for, Jewish radicals to make any headway.

    • Troll: Wizard of Oz
  48. @Parfois1

    Those same ones then claim that Jews somehow infiltrated and corrupted capitalism and that they could run capitalism better without the Jews, without being honest and telling it like it is – that Capitalism is Judaims/Talmudism, and it would still be JudeoCapitalism even without the Jews. And I suppose they think they can have democracy without the Jews when Ezra Pound defined it simply as a “country run by Jews”.

    • Replies: @Wally
  49. Jake says:
    @lavoisier

    True – Jews on average work very hard, including at revolution. The phrase ‘idle hands are the Devil’s workshop’ is most obviously true of Jews. If they are not kept busy with some type ‘honest’ work, they, in huge numbers, will work hard at something that is not good for any society.

    Look at the perversions that long have been accepted as normal in Israel.

  50. @Benjy

    Then we have jews who deliberately change their names to hide their jewishness. Lev Davidovich Bronstein, aka Leon Trotsky, was one of these. Think of all the jews who took on glittery German names: Rothschild (Red Shield), Engels (Angel), Rosenfeld (Field of Roses), Goldman (Man of Gold). Each of these jewish families created elaborate European shields of honor to further hide their jewishness from the goyim.

    True.

    Here’s another of many examples.

    [During the trial of Communist spy, William Remington], One of Remington’s main witnesses was Bernard Redmont. During cross-examination Irving Saypol attempted to show that Redmont was a secret member of the Communist Party of the United States. Saypol asked him why he had changed his name from Rothenberg to Redmont. He explained that it was because “there is a certain amount of anti-Semitism in the world, unfortunately.” Saypol (whose real name was Ike Sapolsky) replied “I take it you are of the Hebrew heritage?… So you wanted to conceal that by taking this other name… That is your concept of good Americanism?… As a matter of fact, it is the Communists who take the false names, isn’t it?”

    https://spartacus-educational.com/William_Remington.htm

    So, both Jews and Commies take false names.

    • Replies: @Benjy
    , @Germanicus
    , @Hibernian
  51. The science is settled!

  52. Jake says:
    @Reg Cæsar

    What was sold to Confederate States beginning with the Spanish-American War was not Bolshevism but Yankee WASP imperialism. Confederate states people were taught by Yankee schoolmarms that their spiritual and cultural ancestors were New England Puritans and Pilgrims. Many of their denominational leaders were doing the same thing by the 1890s – after all, that side won the Civil War.

    The process over time is exactly how all England became culturally WASP – assimilation to the values and identity of the winners.

    Of course, because Anglo-Saxon Puritanism was a Judaizing heresy, and Judaizing heresy not crushed invariably produces pro-Jewish culture that will make at least culture war to cultural genocide against all white cultures seen as being akin to Christendom, WASP culture is something that will at best inadvertently help spread Bolshevism.

    You cannot, in the Modern world, separate the Jewish problem from the WASP problem.

    • Replies: @Wally
  53. anarchyst says:
    @lavoisier

    If it were just “entrepeneurship” I don’t think anyone would mind.
    It is jewish cohesiveness, insularity, cultural and social “tribalism” that jews take for themselves while demanding that the “rest of us” succumb to their purposely destructive externalized calls for “multiculturalism”, “diversity”, forced “race-mixing” and other social ills, that are responsible for jewish “successes”.
    You see, this is part of the pathological jewish plan throughout history. When jews infect a society, they do it with a singular purpose–to destabilize and eventually destroy the host society.
    A prime example of jewish destructive, society-destroying behavior was the Russian Bolshevik Revolution. The Bolsheviks HATED the native Russian population, and were successful in exerting control through sheer brutality, while instilling fear in the native non-jewish population in order to force compliance.
    This is why, during WW2, when the German military passed through a communist-run area, they quite often got cooperation from the local non-jewish townsfolk, pointing out the jewish commissars and other cancers that they wanted to be rid of.
    Jews have been at the forefront in erasing Christian symbology from the public square. Looking at public displays of “religion” one mostly sees jewish menorahs today. There is not a peep from the jewish organizations over religious symbology in public…not a “peep” abut “separation of church and state” from our jewish friends…

  54. Charlies says:

    Joyce in my opinion misses something important: the reason many Jews in Germany & Russia were attracted to the left in 1900-1920 was because right leaning parties tended to (many but not all) be organized by churches, where they didn’t want to join and often wouldn’t have been welcome. Many of these parties explicitly would not accept non catholic or non Christian members.

    To some degree they opted for the left, to a good degree they were pushed to the left.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  55. Benjy says:
    @jacques sheete

    How about Lenin, the godfather of Bolshevism, who was a crypto-jew:

    “Among dozens of newly released documents on display at the State History Museum is a letter written by Lenin’s eldest sister, Anna Ulyanova, saying that their maternal grandfather was a Ukrainian Jew who converted to Christianity to escape the Pale of Settlement and gain access to higher education.

    “He came from a poor Jewish family and was, according to his baptismal certificate, the son of Moses Blank, a native of (the western Ukrainian city of) Zhitomir,” Ulyanova wrote in a 1932 letter to Josef Stalin, who succeeded Lenin after his death in 1924.”

    https://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4073133,00.html

    • Replies: @Jake
  56. Asagirian says: • Website

    Suppressed by Youtube

    • Replies: @follyofwar
  57. onebornfree says: • Website
    @redmudhooch

    redmudhooch says: “The only threat I see are rich people. Capitalists. I don’t know of any communists with 1000 military bases all over the world, terrorizing folks with drones and nukes.”

    Those “rich people” are not capitalist at all- they’re fascists.

    It’s fascism [sometimes called “crony capitalism”, or “colonialism”], that results in “1000 military bases all over the world”.

    Fascism is a minor variation on communism, nothing more, nothing less.

    Both systems [really one system- “collectivism”, or “socialism”, masquerading as two complete opposites] are fraudulent, as are all compulsory [i.e enforced via law] social systems.

    Sorry, the systemic, ongoing fascism of the US empire has almost nothing to do with free markets, capitalism or capitalists.

    But you’ll never get that, and that’s OK 🙂

    Regards, onebornfree

  58. Benjy says:
    @Commentator Mike

    Yes, I agree there are far more Jews around than we suspect.

    Especially in the Unz comment section! But what we have to understand is that these people have been bred over thousands of years to lie to gentiles, who they consider to be dogs. Just think of all the polluted comment threads by actors who clearly come here for no other reason than to spew their malignant misinformation.

    This happens on every Unz article dealing with Jewish Power, and through their talmudic practices they inhibit the free flow of thought and ideas and try to enforce self-censorship. Or they trey try to get people banned by calling them “troll” or professing to be “offended”. That is precisely their purpose, and many are getting paid to do it.

    These Unz articles are like any one of the dozens of ZOG false flag terrorist attacks in the US. Sandy Hook. Vegas Harvest Festival. Tree of Life. Every single time the same (((News Reporters))) and (((Crisis Actors))) show up to befuddle everyone with their lies.

    But the reality here in the comments section of Unz is, as in all other wakes of life, that things would just be a lot nicer with out jews and their lies.

    • Replies: @onebornfree
  59. wayfarer says:

    Socialism in Marxist theory is a transitional social state between the overthrow of capitalism and the realization of communism.

    source: https://www.conservapedia.com/Cultural_Marxism

    Why Today’s Youth Loves Socialism, Explained.

  60. @jacques sheete

    In my opinion, what is playing out, is kind of inner jewish conflict about what is a proper jew. Indicators are all around for this theasis, for example after this Synagogue shooting. The aftermath was the truly interesting one, because Israeli rabbis refused to recognize the killed jews as jews. No burial in Israel.
    https://www.timesofisrael.com/deputy-minister-recognize-non-orthodox-jews-after-us-synagogue-shooting/

    This conflict between the jews is not new, it was present in soviet empire, it was present in Germany, and this conflict is present everywhere, amplified nowadays by Israel. The Us money jews have tons of crazy ideas, pour money in their “child”(see Defamation), and the Israeli jews on the ground have to somehow deal with the mess.
    I think, this is about assimilation vs seggration, from a jewish pov, from my pov, both don’t work and always create a mess for the non jews. jewish society, no matter what flavor, is in its entirety insane, paranoid, and repulsive. They also compete amongst their own in disgusting manners, they usually just stick together if it is against non jews.

  61. Tyrion 2 says:
    @jacques sheete

    Never done so. Never will do so.

    • Replies: @Wally
  62. @Germanicus

    The claim, that zionism was invented by communism or any such ridiculous claim does not hold any water. These two are competing jewish ideologies, both of course problematic, because old testment spirit of war, genocide and deceit fuels any jewish ideology.
    I would remind those who peddle such thing, that it was Stalin, who created the jewish autonomous Oblast Birobidzhan, a competing idea to Palestine.
    The jewish radio still airs in yiddish there, but has almost no listeners.
    Zionism founder Herzl also considered Patagonia in Argentina in his book “Der Judenstaat”.

    It was Winston Churchill btw, who wrote in 1920 on “Zionism versus Bolshevism — A struggle for the soul of the jewish people”.

    • Replies: @Susan
  63. Newton says:
    @nik1975

    Marxism is hegel applied to economics. It claims to be a science with predictive power.

    • Replies: @jack daniels
  64. Worth a look is “The Romance of American Communism” by Vivian Gornick, Basic Books, 1978. Gornick describes her surprise at discovering there were Communists who were NOT Jews. She nostalgically recounts a relative murdering a “scab” by knocking his ladder out from under him. As the man lay dead or dying he painted a red stripe on his back and shoved the handle of the paint-brush into his anus.
    The book consists of portraits of 44 American Communists active prior to Khrushchev’s denunciation of Stalin in 1956. A reviewer for Commentary writes, “In keeping with their proportions in the party itself, Jews predominate in Miss Gornick’s book, though the author does her best to avoid clumping them together too obviously. A section of Chapter One is specifically devoted to the “Jewish Marxists,” but others crop up under such soulful headings as “Those of the Middle Kingdom”; “The Ordinariness of Daily Activity & the Revolution Around the Corner”; “The Wholeness of the CP World”; “Varieties of Aftermath”; and so forth. Out of the forty-four, then, more than half are Jews, and about half of these come from Jewish-leftist backgrounds.”
    The review by Marion Magid is online at https://www.commentarymagazine.com/articles/the-romance-of-american-communism-by-vivian-gornick/

  65. @Ron Unz

    Yes, many, possibly the majority of Bolshevik leaders in 1917 were Jews, although they were secular Jews hated by the religious Jews as traitors. Stalin purged most of them. Yet Stalin was a big supporter of the creation of Israel. Later the USSR consistently sided with Arabs and essentially led the anti-Israel coalition (in sharp contrast to the US, which always was on the side of Israel, even when massive Israeli crimes made it extremely inconvenient).

    Next, in 1991 the majority of the mega-thieves who dismantled and destroyed the so-called socialist USSR were Jews. Some pretended to be religious, but the common feature of them all was that they worshiped only one god, the golden calf. Now Jew-led (by the nose, truth be told) US is supporting Israel to the point of subservience, and does everything in its (waning) power to destroy every country even remotely connected to communism/socialism.

    Given all these indisputable facts, don’t you think that the mantra “Jews are to blame for everything” is no more than a red herring, used by the same greedy golden calf-worshiping elites to deceive the populace, both non-Jewish and Jewish?

  66. Benjy says:
    @Germanicus

    Interesting article. It says:

    “Liberal Jews were Jewish enough to be murdered, but their stream is not Jewish enough to be recognized by the Jewish State,” Oren tweeted.

    Me thinks he doth protest too much. Perhaps the Orthodox jews got wind that it was all a hoax and decided that they wanted nothing to do with it.

    I have read in various places that there is loads of friction and even racism between Ashkenazi and Sephardim. Then you throw in all the jewish royal inbred blood, and the Rothschild “king of the jews” family, and it starts getting difficult to figure out.

    • Replies: @Germanicus
  67. @onebornfree

    But if you look at our constitution, bill of rights, our relatively free press, we seem to be a very different structure than that of the USSR, China, or the Third Reich. So if we are evolving into a disguised version of what they are or were, perhaps our institutions will allow us to devolve back.

    • Replies: @AnonFromTN
    , @onebornfree
  68. @Emblematic

    Everywhere you look on Dissident Right YouTube sites Jones is being interviewed. He’s definitely become something of a cult figure, and is a man on a mission. As Jones is a traditionalist Catholic scholar, fired from a Catholic college for being against abortion, I would hardly call him daft. However, he brings into focus the schism between traditionalist Catholic Christians, Protestants whom he disparages for leaving the true faith, and the dissidents who reject Christianity.

    The one thing these factions seem to agree upon is that Jews, whom he claims have rejected “logos” and thus become “revolutionaries,” are a serious problem today. To Jones, if one has rejected Christ as the Savior, he has also rejected logos, “the order of the universe.” Is Jones saying that all gentiles who have no use for Christ have also rejected logos? It would seem so. Are we heathens condemned to burn in Hell?

  69. onebornfree says: • Website
    @Benjy

    Benjy says: “But the reality here in the comments section of Unz is, as in all other wakes of life, that things would just be a lot nicer with out jews and their lies.”

    Reality check: It ain’t going to get any “nicer.” The world is full of liars and even [ I ain’t kiddin’ here !] people who actually have the nerve to genuinely believe things completely different from yourself.

    Gosh! …..Cripes!

    This just in: No one forces you to believe anything anyone either says, or writes – anywhere, regardless of their professed religious affiliation!

    What you choose to believe /not believe is simply your choice alone .

    Hard to believe , I know, but you can either grow up and take full responsibility for what you choose to believe, or live in denial of your freely made choices and continue banging your head against the brick wall of reality while loudly complaining about “all the lying jews”, or whatever.

    On the other hand, if you enjoy banging your head against brick walls, by refusing to grow up and take responsibility for what and who you choose to believe , by all means carry on – it makes for great entertainment, for myself at least.

    No Regards, onebornfree

  70. Wally says:
    @Tyrion 2

    Nonsense.

    You’ve done so repeatedly in the comments here, and, I might add, had your head handed to you:
    American Pravda: Holocaust Denial, by Ron Unz: http://www.unz.com/runz/american-pravda-holocaust-denial/

    • Replies: @Tyrion 2
  71. Agent76 says:
    @Reg Cæsar

    Good post, “Education is what remains after one has forgotten what one has learned in school.” Albert Einstein

    AUG 14, 2018 How ‘The Birth of a Nation’ Revived the Klan

    On the evening of March 21, 1915
    President Woodrow Wilson attended a special screening at the White House of THE BIRTH OF A NATION, a film directed by D.W. Griffith and based on THE CLANSMAN, a novel written by Wilson’s good friend Thomas Dixon.

    https://www.history.com/news/kkk-birth-of-a-nation-film

  72. @Newton

    Hegel was not a proponent of Science in the modern/ empiricist sense. Hegel thought that philosophical reasoning could uncover the pattern of history while the modern paradigm dispenses with philosophy in favor of observation, generalization, hypothesis-formation, and hypothesis-testing by further observation. Marx’s materialist version of that is still unscientific in the modern sense and I would be surprised if it has non-trivial predictive power. Which is not to say that social science performed in accordance with empiricist norms has much predictive power. People don’t behave in ways that are easy to formulate as generalizations that are precise enough to allow useful predictions. For example, nobody can predict the stock market.

  73. I agree with the basic thrust of the piece, but I’d differ with the at least implicit criticism of the work of Browning and Mazower.

    Both have produced useful and illuminating texts — and in the case of Mazower’s Hitler’s Empire, an eminently readable one. Browning, of course, managed to reduce the executioners of the Holocaust from two-dimensional monsters to, in the words of his title, Ordinary Men. Mazower’s work is considerably more wide-reaching, spanning and analyzing the remarkable variety of German occupation regimes in both Western and Eastern Europe. Indeed, I was mildly surprised to read that Mozower is a Jew, as his text is refreshingly free of the by-now obligatory yet-another-recounting-of-the-Holocaust that has rendered so many other works completely uninteresting and devoid of any novel insights. The Nazis killed all the Jews they could? Really? Now, I did not know that…

    I’d say it’s not that there’s something wrong with either Mazower or Browning, et al. They’re fine, as far as they go, and I’m the better-educated for having read them. Rather, it’s who isn’t there. There aren’t other writers, exploring other themes — for example, the rather obvious links between the role of European Jewry in the various politically and culturally leftist movements of the interwar period and the Holocaust. Some writers have touched on it, but timidly, and often only in passing. Yet it’s really exactly what needs to be dissected if we’re other to move beyond ‘it was bad’ in our understanding of the Holocaust.

  74. Wally says:
    @Jake

    You simply cannot back up anything you just said.
    You don’t even try.

    • Replies: @Jake
  75. onebornfree says: • Website
    @AnonFromTN

    AnonFromTN says: “….don’t you think that the mantra “Jews are to blame for everything” is no more than a red herring,…”

    No, no, no, au contraire mon frere, its all jews, all the time!

    S’obvious! They ‘re all unified, and they run……. everything!

    When in doubt, always remember this simple explanation: “ITZ- DA-FUCKIN JOOZ”! and immediately you’ll feel better, having easily solved all of the worlds problems . 🙂

    So, one more time with feeling – all together now: “ITZ- DA-FUCKIN JOOZ”!

    Can you feel it?

    Regards, onebornfree

    • Troll: BengaliCanadianDude
  76. Tyrion 2 says:
    @Wally

    Actual citation please.

  77. @Asagirian

    I’m glad I purchased PhD. Greg Johnson’s “White Nationalist Manifesto” before it was banned. There is nothing hateful, or suggesting of white supremacy in his book. Why is the Trump Admin not complaining loudly about this growing censorship? Isn’t Amazon supposed to be a “platform” and not a “publisher?” Tucker Carlson, for one, has become a vociferous critic of Jeff Bezos and Amazon.
    So far the book hasn’t been removed from my Kindle.

    • Replies: @Mike P
  78. @nickels

    The nineteenth century gives him [jew] a dominant position within the peoples’ economy

    Here’s a similar observation from the eighteenth (and presumably the seventeenth as well) century,

    I observed most of the rich tradesmen were Jews. That people are in incredible power in this country. They have many privileges above all the natural Turks themselves, and have formed a very considerable commonwealth here, being judged by their own laws. They have drawn the whole trade of the empire into their hands, partly by the firm union amongst themselves, and partly by the idle temper and want of industry in the Turks. Every bassa has his Jew, who is his homme d’affaires; he is let into all his secrets, and does all his business. No bargain is made, no bribe received, no merchandise disposed of, but what passes through their hands. They are the physicians, the stewards, and the interpreters of all the great men. You may judge how advantageous this is to a people who never fail to make use of the smallest advantages. They have found the secret of making themselves so necessary, that they are certain of the protection of the court, whatever ministry is in power. Even the English, French, and Italian merchants, who are sensible of their artifices, are, however, forced to trust their affairs to their negotiation, nothing of trade being managed without them, and the meanest amongst them being too important to be disobliged, since the whole body take care of his interests, with as much vigour as they would those of the most considerable of their members. They are many of them vastly rich, but take care to make little public shew of it, though they live in their houses in the utmost luxury and magnificence.
    -Lady Mary Wortley Montagu, LET. XXXIV.
    To the Abbot of ——.
    Adrianople, May 17 (1717). O. S.
    https://andromeda.rutgers.edu/~jlynch/Texts/montagu-letters.html

    Sounds a lot like twenty first century USA to me.

  79. @Germanicus

    This conflict between the jews is not new

    True, and Josephus would agree with you.

    …always create a mess for the non jews. jewish society, no matter what flavor, is in its entirety insane, paranoid, and repulsive.

    I’d add infantile as well.

    The OT is full of that sort of thing as well. Adam and Eve, Cain and Abel…

  80. @Tyrion 2

    ‘Why are you all so desperate to claim a position of total passivity?’

    Curiously, I would say that it is you Jews who claim a position of total passivity.

    Anti-semitism in general and the Holocaust in particular apparently just occur in a void; there’s no Jewish agency at all. If there is any explanation at all, it’s along the lines of Goldhagen’s absurd ‘eliminationist anti-semitism’; gentiles are just born wanting to kill Jews for all intents and purposes.

    Nothing Jews do has anything to do with it at all. Indeed, Jews haven’t done anything. It’s remarkable; for 2500 years, they have been the world’s only perfectly passive people. Germans, Greeks, Turks, Native Hawaiians, Frenchmen, Japanese, Swedes, Chinese, Highland Scots — all have acted and been acted upon, and it’s all had a great deal to do with their respective and varied fates — but not Jews.

    Utterly, perfectly, and immaculately passive and innocent — and for over two millenia, no less. That’s about it, isn’t it? Or perhaps you’d care to enter into a serious discussion of it all?

    • Replies: @Tyrion 2
  81. Wally says:
    @jacques sheete

    Then what, in all seriousness, is the best source of reliable information on the ‘Holodomor’?

    Thanks.

  82. Wally says:
    @Parfois1

    said:
    “Eventually Stalin started the groundwork to remove Jews from the leadership (e.g. introduction of quota system in education and government) but his sudden death put an end to the reforms.”

    Please present proof of that ‘removal’.

    • Replies: @Parfois1
    , @Seraphim
  83. @jack daniels

    I like the “relatively free press” thing. To the best of my knowledge, current uniformity of opinions in MSM was only matched in the worst periods of the Third Reich and Stalin’s rule in the USSR. If Western press is free, I am the Emperor of the East.

  84. @redmudhooch

    My god. The voice of reason! It is so refreshing to read your inclusive comprehensive (instead of the cherry-picking, devise-your-thesis-first-and-then-scrabble-around-for-evidence-to-support-it form of rhetoric most writers and readers on here practice)

  85. Wally says:
    @Commentator Mike

    said:

    1. Those same ones then claim that Jews somehow infiltrated and corrupted capitalism and that they could run capitalism better without the Jews, without being honest and telling it like it is – that Capitalism is Judaims/Talmudism, and it would still be JudeoCapitalism even without the Jews.
    2. And I suppose they think they can have democracy without the Jews when Ezra Pound defined it simply as a “country run by Jews”.

    1. Capitalism is not Judaism. It is an economic process that when not corrupted by government (and those that assist in corruption) works to the advantage of all. No strawmen, no contradictions, please.

    2. A country run by Jews is not a democracy, Pound was right. No strawmen, no contradictions, please.

    • Replies: @Commentator Mike
  86. onebornfree says: • Website
    @jack daniels

    jack daniels says: “But if you look at our constitution, bill of rights, our relatively free press, we seem to be a very different structure than that of the USSR, China, or the Third Reich. So if we are evolving into a disguised version of what they are or were, perhaps our institutions will allow us to devolve back.”

    “Evolving into”? Wake up man, we’ve already become a “version of what they are or were”!

    You don’t get out much, do you! 🙂 .

    Coincidentally, I just posted a link to an article covering the myths of the US constitution and Bill of Rights at my blog. It’s the third article down from the top, titled : “The US Constitution Scam”, here :
    http://onebornfree-mythbusters.blogspot.com/2019/03/onebornfrees-special-scam-alerts-no-89.html

    See what you think.

    Regards, onebornfree

  87. @onebornfree

    How did you arrive at this,

    On the other hand, if you enjoy banging your head against brick walls, by refusing to grow up and take responsibility for what and who you choose to believe , by all means carry on…

    and this,

    This just in: No one forces you to believe anything anyone either says, or writes – anywhere, regardless of their professed religious affiliation!

    from this,

    Benjy says: “But the reality here in the comments section of Unz is, as in all other wakes of life, that things would just be a lot nicer with out jews and their lies.”

    ?

    Especially since you seem to believe that the world would be better off without liars as well?

    He never said it would get better, just that it would get better if

    Guess what? It probably would get better if all liars changed their ways, but there is no chance that they will.

    • Replies: @Benjy
    , @onebornfree
  88. @Wally

    Then what, in all seriousness, is the best source of reliable information on the ‘Holodomor’?

    Thanks for asking. I wish I knew the answer. All I know was pieced together and I never claimed any expertise.

    About all I can offer is to Google it and hope Google hasn’t flushed it all down the sewer. have you checked codoh?

    This may be a start.

    The Foreign Office and the Famine: British Documents on Ukraine and the Great Famine of 1932-1933
    By Marco Carynnyk, Lubomyr Y. Luciuk, Bohdan S. Kordan, and the Limestone Press
    http://faminegenocide.com/resources/famine_map.html

    Kindly let me know what you find. Thanks.

    • Replies: @Anon
    , @pogohere
  89. Tyrion 2 says:
    @Colin Wright

    Wrong. Accusing someone of hating you is not the same thing as making them responsible for all of your own negative actions. The difference is huge and you’re on the wrong side of that difference.

    • Replies: @Colin Wright
  90. Anonymous[235] • Disclaimer says:

    It’s amazing to see that even a supposed academic can’t defend the Tribe without insulting everyone’s intelligence in the process. His arguments are literally no better than what we see here from Hasbara cubicle monkeys like Tyrion 2.

  91. Benjy says:
    @onebornfree

    I am not sure where your bitterness and hyperbole come from. I do feel sorry for you, because clearly you have never lived in a high trust society. One where you can leave your doors unlocked and you don’t have to lock the bicycle. One where people tell you if you over pay them, or return your lost wallet.

    So instead people like you force us to lock our doors, keep our women and children locked up, and never trust someone on their word of honor. Why? I don’t really understand, except that somehow otherwise jews won’t be able to lie to us and be forced to tell the truth. It sounds nightmarish. You are clearly ready for the noahide laws.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  92. The other Jewish contribution to the 20th century was the atomic bomb. All the major scientists involved in developing the bomb on both sides during the second world war were Jews. We would not have had Heroshima without them.

  93. wayfarer says:

    Cultural Marxism: Its central idea is to soften up and prepare Western Civilization for economic Marxism after a gradual, relentless, sustained attack on every institution of Western culture, including schools, literature, art, film, the Christian religious tradition, the family, sexual mores, national sovereignty, etc. The attacks are usually framed in Marxist terms as a class struggle between oppressors and oppressed; the members of the latter class allegedly include women, minorities, homosexuals, and adherents of non-Western ideologies such as Islam. Cultural Marxism has been described as “the cultural branch of globalism.”

    source: https://www.conservapedia.com/Cultural_Marxism

    Trotskyism: the political, economic, and social principles advocated by Trotsky especially the theory and practice of communism developed by or associated with Trotsky and usually including adherence to the concept of worldwide revolution as opposed to socialism in one country.

    source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trotskyism

    Who Made the Useful Idiots of the Left?

    • Replies: @republic
  94. Mulegino1 says:

    Organized Jewry incarnates the spirit of the “Jew” – one of the few words relating to a race or ethnicity that can be used as a verb as well as a noun- kind of like “gyp.” (What the gypsies do to the surrounding landscape- littering and trashing it- Jewry does to any host culture wherein it achieves critical mass.) International Jewry “Jews” the Christian, or post-Christian west into accepting the fake Holohoax narrative to deflect from the horrendous crimes against Christian Russia, Hungary, Romania, etc. committed in the name and spirit of Judeo-Bolshevism, which, in the case of Russia, was merely practical Talmudism carried out on a massive scale, facilitated, as always, by pet shabbos goy auxiliaries. In the case of the Judeo-Bolshevik revolution, the vast majority of the latter were other ethnic minorities within the Russian Empire.

    Jewry has created a fake perpetual victim status based upon a false history, which it demands that the gentiles accept unconditionally. The Holohoax is the centerpiece of this, of course, but the whole historical meme of the “Jews as victims” is replete with falsehood after falsehood, and heaps gross exaggeration upon gross exaggeration. Of course, this is not to say that no Jews ever suffered injustice or crime at the hands of their gentile hosts, only that most of said “injustices” were more often than not a reaction to the criminality and perfidy of Jewry as a whole.

    In order to deflect from the crimes of the Judeo-Bolsheviks, Jewry had to create a Manichean counter-narrative. German National Socialism and its Fuehrer fit the bill perfectly, even though the vast majority of its positive achievements (especially in the realm of economics and raising the standard of living of the
    German people) were gained via legal and democratic processes, and any of its so called “excesses”, such as the reaction to the Rohm coup attempt or the “Night of the Broken Glass” were absolutely minuscule when compared to the gigantic atrocities perpetuated by monsters like Trotsky,
    Kaganovich, Yezhov, Sverdlov, Berman, Pauker, Bela Kun, etc.

    Nevertheless, the “Nazis” were convenient targets, precisely because the order they established, their grand aesthetics and their positive effect on Germany represented low hanging fruit to the subterranean rodent like moguls of Hollywood, who never met a superior culture they could not mimic or burlesque with their low brow shtetl noise and tackiness.

    Jewry and its shabbos goyim among the Allies needed to justify the destruction and pillaging of the Europe of Nations in the Second World, so they invented their cheap Holohoax mythology as a new pseudo-religion, along with its pseudo- heroic epilogue, the “New Exodus” into “Eretz Israel” which was nothing more than a shady and cheap Hollywoodesque effort to mask their theft and murder in Palestine.

  95. @Wally

    1. Capitalism sounds utopian to me. Good in theory bad in practice, just like they say about communism.

    2. I think I didn’t misread Pound.He did say: “Democracy is now defined in Europe as a ‘country run by Jews’”. So “defined by whom”? Certainly not by any of the proponents of European democracy.

    • Replies: @Wally
  96. @Alfred

    Alfred—Just so. As to the origin of ‘Judeo-Christian’, this article calls it ‘an invention of American politics.’ The author, Yori Yanover, writes: ‘To insist that we have some kind of bond with religious Christians because of similar core values, is to propagate a terrible lie…I resent [the] attempt to erect an ideological partnership between Christianity and its blameless victims.’

  97. @Emblematic

    “Shut-up,” he explained.

    With friends like Emblematic, Ron Unz doesn’t need enemies.

  98. Mike P says:
    @follyofwar

    I’m glad I purchased PhD. Greg Johnson’s “White Nationalist Manifesto” before it was banned.

    There is a free (probably bootlegged) PDF copy on archive org.

    • Replies: @follyofwar
  99. @Benjy

    I had the idea, the likud jews did the hit job on the liberal jews. Who knows what “business” went on in this Synagogue.
    Reason I think this, if you look at it from the bird’s view, the likud jews and allies want all jews in Israel. They prepare their “greater Israel”. The liberal jews are usually outside Israel, and kind of parasite in the host country. Why should they go to Israel?
    Jewish power comes from controlling the host, if all jews went to Israel, jewish power would drastically reduce, and all jews were in one place…
    After all, the likud jews aim for the temple and reenact the bible as playbook in cahoots with the nutty Evangelicals.
    Another conflict seems to be the obvious one between Israel and jewish marxist creation UN. They have a contract with UN, and Un wants them to honor the contract, but that’s impossible if they want to advance the jewish plan. Hence the UN of all corrupt orgs is called “antisemitic”. The same with Soros and Adelson, their pupptes call each other “nazi” and question each other’s jewishness.
    The jews are nuts.

  100. Bolshevik Jews Put The Interests Of Israel Ahead Of The Interests Of The USA.

    Bolshevik Jews Push Nation-Wrecking Mass Legal Immigration.

    Bolshevik Jews Push Amnesty For Illegal Alien Invaders.

    Bolshevik Jews Push Multiculturalism and Globalization and Financialization.

    Bolshevik Jews Have Bought And Paid For Trump And the US Congress.

    Bolshevik Jews Attacked Walt and Mearsheimer For Writing THE ISRAEL LOBBY.

    Bolshevik Jews Attack Khat Tea Sipping Somalian For Speaking The Truth About Bolshevik Jews.

    The Only Thing Holding Multicultural America Together Is Money Printing & Monetary Extremism.

    • Agree: DESERT FOX
    • Replies: @Colin Wright
  101. Ron Unz says:
    @AnonFromTN

    Yes, many, possibly the majority of Bolshevik leaders in 1917 were Jews

    Actually, I think the history is a little complicated, which makes it easier for biased writers to obscure the reality.

    For example, based on what I’ve read, during most of 1917 and for many years earlier, the Mensheviks were actually much, much more heavily Jewish than the Bolsheviks under Lenin. I think pretty much all the top leaders of the former were Jewish, but only half or fewer of the latter. For example, Trotsky was still a Menshevik at that point and quite hostile to Lenin. So I strongly suspect that the very heavy financial support of Jacob Schiff and his friends actually went to Trotsky, and this later got garbled into “supporting the Bolsheviks.”

    However, after Trotsky and his large group of Jewish revolutionary friends from NYC returned to Russia, they soon merged with the Bolsheviks along with lots of other Mensheviks and various other revolutionary factions, like the Left SRs. And it was at that point that the augmented “Bolsheviks” became so overwhelmingly Jewish.

  102. Benjy says:
    @jacques sheete

    What I was unsuccessfully alluding to there was the idea that jewish lies ruin every aspect of our lives. Their main target is the European family, and they simply cannot tell the Europeans that this is the target of their destruction, so they lie. This Crowley style “Do what thou Wilt” comes straight out of the Talmud, and it has infected virtually every aspect of US culture. Can you name one institution in the US where merit and honor are more important than lying and back dealing?

  103. republic says:
    @wayfarer

    Also known as the long march though the institutions (cultural Marxism)

    the neocons were originally Trotskyites.

    • Replies: @wayfarer
  104. @Ron Unz

    Fascinatingly enough, Schiff’s Wikipedia page claims he “immeadiately rejected Lenin and Trostky, started funding anti-Bolshevist groups” and insisted upon repayment of February revolution funds.

    Schiff was a good boy. He only supported Kerensky.

    • Replies: @republic
  105. Benjy says:
    @Ron Unz

    “However, after Trotsky and his large group of Jewish revolutionary friends from NYC returned to Russia”

    Trotsky arrived with a lot more than just “Jewish revolutionary friends”. He had millions in gold coin and the blessings of all the major capitalist jews in America. Certainly he had weaponry as well. He had the backing of Wilson, House, and likely many of the British. Plus the big bankers like the Rothschilds, Warburgs, who knows who else.

    So Trotsky swaggered into Petrograd wearing Marxist black leather, with his gold money and all his wealthy jew connections and support, and a gang of well armed thugs, and ended up not only controlling the whole thing, but murdering millions of Christian slavs to boot.

    • Replies: @Ron Unz
  106. @Felix Krull

    Browning did testify. If submitting a report absolved an expert witness from cross examination, everyone would do it.

    See: https://www.hdot.org/trial-materials/trial-transcripts/ and days 16 & 17, in particular.

  107. republic says:

    Similarly, in Mark Roodhouse’s Oxford-published Black Market Britain: 1939–1955, it is remarked that Jews were massively over-represented in prosecutions for black-market activity in London during the 1940s.[7] The biggest war profiteer in the trade of illicit food in war-time Britain was the Jew Sidney Seymour, born Skylinsky, who received the heaviest sentence of the period for a black market offence after evading food regulations and stockpiling black-market food at his synagogue

    In July 1942 when Lord Chief Justice Caldecote sentenced Sidney Seymour—one of ten
    London businessmen convicted of evading food regulations—to four years’ penal
    servitude and fined him £2,000.
    Th is was national news, as Seymour received the
    heaviest sentence for a black market offence to date. Police and food inspectors
    investigating the ring found black market food stored in a shop storeroom that
    doubled as a synagogue on holy days

    Incidentally I found from Anatoly Karlin’s blog that in library Genesis, that Black Market Britain as well as the book being reviewed here (A Spector Haunting Europe) is available in full text from that source

  108. republic says:
    @HashtagFACT

    You know that Wikipedia is heavily edited by Zionists.

  109. Ron Unz says:
    @Benjy

    Trotsky arrived with a lot more than just “Jewish revolutionary friends”. He had millions in gold coin and the blessings of all the major capitalist jews in America. Certainly he had weaponry as well. He had the backing of Wilson, House, and likely many of the British. Plus the big bankers like the Rothschilds, Warburgs, who knows who else.

    Well, that’s certainly possible, though I’m somewhat skeptical about many of those details. As everyone knows, there’s a gigantic amount of “smoke” surrounding those controversial historical events, and a vast number of writers have been spewing dishonest propaganda, from every conceivable ideological perspective.

    What sort of credible source do you have for those dramatic claims?

    • Replies: @Benjy
    , @Reg Cæsar
  110. Wally says:
    @Commentator Mike

    1. How so? Be specific.

    2. Like I said: A country run by Jews is not a democracy.

    Pound said “NOW defined in Europe”.

    Indeed, you did misread Pound, you just said so.

    • Replies: @Commentator Mike
  111. Jake says:
    @Benjy

    Lenin was a quarter Jewish, a quarter Russian, a quarter Tatar (meaning ethnically Turkic), and a quarter Uralic (the language group, not the region).

    Lenin was a mix of elements that made up the Russian Empire. Lenin’s father was devoutly Orthodox, and Lenin hated him for his religion, not his Tatar genes. Lenin’s love for his mother was for her being a Jew and non-Christian.

    • Replies: @Benjy
  112. wayfarer says:
    @republic

    Humanity has had some real winners when it comes to arrogant ignorant ideologies, but this year, cultural Marxism gets my vote for the Darwin Award 2019.

    Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Darwin_Awards

  113. @Tyrion 2

    ‘Wrong. Accusing someone of hating you is not the same thing as making them responsible for all of your own negative actions. The difference is huge and you’re on the wrong side of that difference.’

    Okay — so are you saying people hate Jews and it is the actions of Jews that cause that hate?

    I wouldn’t go quite that far — but if that’s your view…

    • Troll: Tyrion 2
  114. Benjy says:
    @Ron Unz

    Credible? Are you sure you don’t mean Kosher?

    How about the writings of Anthony Sutton or G. Edward Griffin?

    In any case here is one, Richard Spence. Is that kosher enough?

    https://firstworldwarhiddenhistory.wordpress.com/2017/10/31/the-rape-of-russia-3-trotskys-secret-benefactors/

    “In 1910, Schiff was one of several Americans who campaigned to revoke a commercial treaty with the Russians over their mistreatment of Russian Jews. When the Czarist regime sought him out for loans he refused, and no one else at Kuhn, Loeb was permitted to underwrite Russian requests for finance. After the Czar’s abdication, Schiff dropped his opposition to the Russian government. His views on Zionism experienced a similar volte-face. Schiff initially opposed Zionism, believing it to be a secular, nationalistic perversion of the Jewish faith and incompatible with American citizenship. He funded agricultural projects in Palestine, however, and later favoured the notion of a cultural homeland for Jews in Palestine. [7]

    Schiff encouraged and financed armed revolt against the Czar. He provided financial support for Jewish self-defence groups in Russia, including Bolshevik and other socialist revolutionaries. He was set on fomenting revolution in Russia. The America author, G. Edward Griffin, pondered the question of Schiff’s involvement and unequivocally stated that Schiff ‘was one of the principle backers of the Bolshevik revolution and personally financed Trotsky’s trip from New York to Russia’. [8] Years later, Jacob Schiff’s grandson admitted that his grandfather had given about $20 million for the triumph of communism in Russia. [9]”

    On 25 March, 1917, Trotsky, who had been living a very comfortable life-style with his family in New York for the previous eleven weeks, was issued with papers for his passage to Russia. The British consulate assured him that no obstacles would be placed in his way. ‘Everything was in good order’, according to Trotsky, [13] but who had the power to issue such high-level permits? The surprising answer is that it reached right to the top of government in Washington. Professor Antony Sutton revealed that ‘President Woodrow Wilson was the fairy godmother who provided Trotsky with a passport to return to Russia to carry forward the revolution’. The passport came with a Russian entry permit, a British transit visa [14] and $10,000 in cash. One first-class cabin and sixteen second class cabins were booked for Trotsky and his party of fellow revolutionaries on the S.S. Kristianiafjord, of the Norwegian-America Line. They departed New York for Oslo and the onward journey to Petrograd, but failed to anticipate trouble ahead. Everyone had. During a scheduled stop at Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canadian officials removed Trotsky and his entire entourage from the ship and incarcerated them in an internment camp. The Halifax officials had not been advised of Trotsky’s mission and naturally considered the men a danger to the Allied cause. A flurry of angry telegrams eventually descended upon Nova Scotia from both sides of the Atlantic. Trotsky and the others were released to continue their journey to Russia.

    A Canadian Intelligence officer, Lieutenant Colonel John Maclean, later wrote an article entitled, Why did we let Trotsky go? How Canada lost an Opportunity to Shorten the War. According to MacLean, Trotsky was released ‘at the request of the British Embassy in Washington… acting on the request of the U.S. State Department, who were acting for someone else.’ [15] MacLean did not elaborate on who that ‘someone else’ was. The Canadian officials were instructed to inform the press that Trotsky was an American citizen travelling on an American passport, and his release was specifically requested by the state department. Clearly, Trotsky had strong support at the highest levels of power in Britain and the U.S., and orders were issued that he must be given ‘every consideration’. [16] Trotsky and his entourage were duly released and allowed to continue their journey. This is not normal procedure.

    • Agree: DESERT FOX
    • Replies: @Ron Unz
  115. @republic

    ‘You know that Wikipedia is heavily edited by Zionists.’

    Ah. Le understatement du jour.

  116. @Charles Pewitt

    ‘America is so broken we have to import Somalis and elect them to Congress in order to get honest commentary on Jewish power and loyalty.”

    Indeed. There’s something exasperating about that fact that there isn’t one white man in Congress with the courage of the sole Somali woman.

    …that I don’t think much of Somalis only makes it all the worse. Our moral superiors, apparently.

    …time for my ‘Ilhan Omar speaks for me’ bumper sticker. Sigh.

    • Agree: mark green
  117. @Johnny Walker Read

    The Bolshevist were in the the North my friend with Lincoln’s “Red Republican’s”

    Lincoln didn’t hug the likes of Uncle Joe Stalin. His war crimes, whatever they were, are trivial in comparison to Roosevelt’s and Truman’s.

    (Also, there is no “North”, except in the mind of the South.)

    Too many moderns condemn the South because half of them rebelled against Truman. Hah! If they should be condemned for anything, it’s that none of them rebelled against FDR. That’s the boot that didn’t drop.

    • Replies: @Hibernian
    , @Jake
  118. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @anon

    Russia under Stalin was very pro establishing. Zionist state in Palestine.
    Maybe because early Zionism envisaged a Jewish communist society with collective farms ( kibbutz) in Hebrew public housing for all, national health and the rest.

    1948 when the Zionist colony in Palestine became Israel

    It was the Russian delegation that introduced the Resolution to Establish the state of Israel in Palestine
    Russia and 2 Russian states, Bylrussia and Ukraine were all individual members with 1 vote each. Also, Russia ruled 11 central and E European states thus 14 kicked in votes. Plus Russia occupied big chunks of Greece Austria and Iran. I don’t know I’d Iran was a member at the Time So Russia controlled some votes.

    As soon as the resolution was introduced. the Russian delegation and American zionists set about lobbying ( bribering and blackmailing ) the Latin American delegates mostly with gop grade mink coats supplied by Jewish furriers whether they wanted to donate the coats to the cause or not.

    The wife of the Cuban ambassador to the UN was the only one who refused the coat. Other bribes were given and accepted of course. USA president Truman finally collapsed under relentless lobbying and ordered our ambassodor ambassador to vote in favor of the Russian resolution to make the Zionist colony into the stage of israel

    Later on, when things turned racial brown Arabs against White Jews, Russia switched sides mainly because the Russians backed all the Africans middle easterners and Asians anxious to get rid of their White European colonizers

    Russia introduced the resolution to establish the state of Israel and bribed and blackmailed the many Latin Americans into voting in favor of Israel.

    In 1947, Jewish USA army Air Force pilots flew to Russia occupied Czechoslovakia and handed over to the Russians the latest state of the art American radar systems plus other USA military technology and secret information. That was part of the deal between American Zionist traitors and Russia to sponsor Israel in the UN

    That’s how Israel became a state.

  119. Benjy says:
    @Jake

    Lenin was a mix of elements that made up the Russian Empire.

    I guess that would make him a RASP in your book.

  120. @Ron Unz

    Whatever happened, Trotsky had it coming, and so did Diego Rivera, whom he had cuckolded.

  121. Anon[178] • Disclaimer says:
    @animalogic

    However, it is a very complex issue.

    It’s not. To maintain that the topic is “complex” is a form of argument that ultimately looks to absolve the one hundred percent guilty perpetrators to some degree.

    The urge to simply make “communist” & “Jew” synonyms should be resisted.

    No, it should not. Which becomes clear when you are familiar with the depth of Jewish teaching in their core texts. Their teachings in regard to non-Jews precisely reflect and recommend the values of communism.

    There are numerous reasons why Jews should be attracted to socialism: not least it’s emphasis on secular, universal & egalitarian values.

    What “socialsm” are you talking about? National Socialism, Social Democracy, or Communism? First, exclude the middle choice as a hybrid not worth discussing in terms of long term political relevance. National Socialism and Communism are opposite concepts. They are not the same animal, but polar animals.

    Any assertion to the contrary is born of Neocon (Jewish communist) influence and propaganda. I can explain precisely why and how they are polar opposite in a detailed essay that is out of scope of this immediate response. I do not recommend that you challenge me on this topic, but do so if you must. I can break it down comparing their core political structures.

    Jews choose a form of National Socialism for themselves when they have an opportunity to incubate group political strength. They choose communism when they want to weaken and control a large non-Jewish population.

    Those are the socialism(s) that Jews are attracted to, and these are the precise and opposite roles (strength creation and destruction) of these two forms of economic socialism when combined with polar opposite social values (social values and politics being the defining measure of any political movement and all politics).

    Of course, such values appealed to goys also.

    Which socialism? Which goys?

    Judaism has been spreading its cults first within the marginalized and poorer sectors of non-Jewish society since it began spreading the rot of its various anti-gentile cults with the Dionysus and Bacchus cults in Greece and Rome. Cults that later morphed into Christianity, which spread the same way. Note the similarity in the spread of these cults and communism.

    No one has ever claimed that non-Jews, and especially those of weakest position, are not susceptible to Jewish propaganda and control. That does not absolve the Jew of his creating and leading roles in these movements that would not exist without him.

    The Jewish/communist issue needs to address certain questions.

    Why do we “need” to address anything that you state? We don’t “need” to address anything that is predicated on your prior introduction of your false reason.

    What I notice is an attempt to continue a debate, indefinitely and under false reason, when the discussion is absolutely solved and over.

    What I notice is a Jewish tactic that is embodied by an ever-ongoing attempt to give the illusion of debate and non-resolution.

    Every moment that you and people like you are indulged in such circular tactics, we lose more. This debate is not cost-free. You ask for a continual payment in time for absolutely zero payment to us on your end or that of Jews. This is an upside-free indulgence for us.

    No thank you, when there has been no reasonable, honest, or effective counterpoint in defense of the Jews since WWII. No thank you, when their texts explicitly call for the equivlent of communism and worse for non-Jews.

    Firstly, what type of Jew was attracted to communism ?

    That seems like an open ended question. Here is the only answer that it deserves: all Jews who believe in the promises of Judaism. So, all Jews.

    Beyond the simplicity that your question requests, the answer to your question is implied by the fact that Jews vote Left Wing outside of their Far Right ethnonationalist state at a rate of more than any other religious group.

    The Jewish intelligensia were clearly attracted, but what of working & middle class jews ?

    See above.

    To what degree were such Jews self consciously “Jewish” ?

    Irrelevant pedantic bullshit. See above, and especially my commentary in regard to tactics that are designed only to ever-distend a non-debate at no cost to you or Jews but at great cost to us.

    Its axiomatic that anyone that successfully identifies with and is accepted as a member (through maternal lineage) by the Jewish ethnic group is Jewish. This is how the Rabbis see it.

    Its axiomatic that anyone who supports this group, via their association with it, supports either directly or indirectly the group goals that are stated in their texts.

    Those goals include the equivalent of communism and much worse for non-Jews.

    Were they secular ?

    You’re a bullshit artist, and a poor one. In the Jewish ethnic group, it is irrelevant if Jews are “secular”.

    It can also be argued that the Jewish religion is a form of secularism, as its primary goals are one hundred percent Jewish ethnic group survival, domination, and genocide of all other peoples. As stated in their texts. That is not a religion as most people would define it. That is a political plan, or even a war plan, dressed up in religious garb.

    None of these questions detract from Joyce’s valuable article, but they do require answers (which I don’t have) to fill out our understanding of this contentious issue….(of course, ALL Jewish questions are contentious).

    Not at this stage, they don’t. All of this has been prior discussed in the decades leading up to today. All that nonsense discussion has done is allow the time and room for evil forces that are defined by Jewish ideology and heavy with Jews and their support to advance. We do not need to repeat these discussions to satisfy your feigned or sincere ignorance on the topic, all at further cost to us.

    • Replies: @animalogic
  122. Ron Unz says:
    @Benjy

    How about the writings of Anthony Sutton or G. Edward Griffin?

    Well, I looked at a couple of Sutton’s books a while back, and wasn’t very impressed. And I’m only vaguely familiar with Griffin, who seems something of a nut.

    On the other hand, most of the specific claims made in the passages you quoted were already well known to me, and probably correct, being generally based upon fairly credible sources. However, what they say is very, very different from your original claims, which I found quite doubtful.

    For example, you quote a passage saying that Trotsky returned to Russia from NYC with $10,000 in cash, which seems perfectly plausible. However, earlier you’d claimed he arrived with “millions in gold coin,” which I sharply questioned. You also claimed that Trotsky had the backing of Wilson, House, the British, and most of the big Jewish bankers, including the Rothschilds and Warburgs, and I don’t see evidence for any of that.

    The wildest sort of exaggerations and speculations are pretty common regarding the Russian Revolution, not least by anonymous commenters on the Internet…

    • Replies: @Benjy
    , @Benjy
    , @Bill Jones
  123. Anonymous[846] • Disclaimer says:

    The cat got out of the bag long ago. Everybody knows the Bolsheviks were led by jews.
    The Cheka was jews. The gulag camps run by jews. The Central Committees run by jews.
    C’mon.
    Putin has even mentioned this.
    Yagoda killed millions. Kaganovich killed millions more.
    Solzhenitsyn said they killed over 60 million people. They burned churches to the ground,
    killed priests, raped nuns.
    Sounds like jews to me!

    Or it could just be those evil goyim “scapegoating” those nice jews that dindu nuffin.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  124. Anonymous[190] • Disclaimer says:

    For example, he broadly describes the Judeo-Bolshevik elsewhere [p.8] as “an ethno-ideological zealot, a destructive border crosser intent on mobilizing local Jews and other discontented groups to overturn the social and moral order.” This is actually an excellent definition of a Judeo-Bolshevik, but it should be obvious that Jewish Mensheviks can easily fit into it, along with Jewish socialists and liberals.

    Along with Jewish capitalists, too … think George Soros, whom the author mentioned earlier.

    https://nyebevannews.co.uk/labour-mp-siobhain-mcdonagh-to-be-anti-capitalism-is-to-be-anti-semitic/?fbclid=IwAR1hxg5fumHoKk90p11nwI4zDhKXtuH0I7ObRijworQne1dtNExCm-dFYc8

  125. Anon[178] • Disclaimer says:

    He continues: “Given this history, the purpose of studying the Judeo-Bolshevik myth must be not to determine how true it is.

    My word, if that’s not the line-in-the-sand that Jews seek to draw for any and every criticism against them.

    If that’s not the line-in-the-sand of which every liar would dream.

  126. Anonymous[192] • Disclaimer says:
    @Ron Unz

    Even the J-Post says so!

    “I thought about something just now: The decision to nationalize this library was made by the first Soviet government, whose composition was 80-85 percent Jewish,” Putin said June 13 during a visit to Moscow’s Jewish Museum and Tolerance Center.

    http://www.jpost.com/Jewish-World/Jewish-News/Putin-First-Soviet-government-was-mostly-Jewish-317150

  127. The distance between a reputable (a University Press) woman and a disreputable (a sellout) woman isn’t that great, if there is convergence of mutual interest but the original old question never goes away in spite of raising newer questions of whiteness and Islam… there must be a catch!

  128. Anonymous[190] • Disclaimer says:
    @redmudhooch

    The de-Jewification of communism was largely accomplished by Stalin. He’s the one who got rid of all the Trotskyites. After Stalin’s death, once the country was rebuilt from the war, it settled down a lot: no more famines, no more experiments with ‘alternative lifestyles,’ or any of the other nonsense that characterized the USSR in the 20s and 30s when it still dominated by Jews. To be sure, I don’t think the Soviet Union ever became a ‘Workers’ Paradise,’ but it improved significantly over what it had been before the war. Just goes to show what can be accomplished when the government puts more emphasis on building factories than burning churches!

  129. @Wally

    1. In a thread on 29th January (Venezuela, the Deep State, and Subversion of the Trump Presidency) I wrote :

    Modern capitalism is simply legalised loan sharking and debt slavery. There are no free markets, fair competition, or whatever else are the principles of this utopian capitalist system you all believe in. It’s all about getting everyone hooked on debt to service interest on their loans and controlling markets, controlling just about everything. And it’s not as if the money they lend you, paper or electronic, is real in terms of any value. I don’t know what those smart economists are all about.

    And you can easily check how much in debt everyone is starting with US.

    2. Again you define democracy as an ideal, Pound as reality.

    Isn’t that the same how people complain about communism, that it looks good on paper but doesn’t work well in reality?

    • Replies: @Wally
    , @jacques sheete
  130. @Rational

    True, but unfortunately, the two seemed to be joined at the hip for now.

  131. onebornfree says: • Website
    @jacques sheete

    jacques sheete says: He never said it would get better, just that it would get better if…It probably would get better if all liars changed their ways, but there is no chance that they will.”Guess what? It probably would get better if all liars changed their ways, but there is no chance that they will.”

    1]“It probably would get better if all liars changed their ways, but there is no chance that they will.”

    Which was basically my point, regardless of whether or not they are jews lying or not. It makes no difference – [so get over it].

    2]” He never said it would get better, just that it would get better if…”

    I’m sorry , but you are wrong. You misread him. And the qualifier “if” never even appears, or is even implied by his original statement, as far as I can see.

    He clearly stated that this site specifically [Unz] “as in all other wakes of life….. would just be a lot nicer with out jews and their lies.”

    In other words he claimed that both the world in general, and this site in particular, would be “a lot nicer” without [specifically] jewish liars

    Regards, onebornfree

    • Replies: @jacques sheete
  132. Benjy says:
    @Ron Unz

    “The wildest sort of exaggerations and speculations are pretty common regarding the Russian Revolution, not least by anonymous commenters on the Internet…”

    It is the wild west on Unz comment section. Those whose vested interests are to protect the narrative at all costs, versus wild cowboy commentors.

    But the real joke is that if I don’t follow cowboy commentors, then who can I believe, people who won’t mention jews, let alone freemasonry?

    Under the Sign of the Scorpion has a few masonic tidbits about Trotsky:

    http://www.conspirazzi.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/lina-sign-scorpion.pdf

    – His father was a wealthy jew who owned an entire village near Odessa
    – Trotsky joined the Workers league secret society in 1897
    – Jailed for 2 years for being a member of the Workers League 1898. Thrown in prison in Odessa for 2 years for membership in this secret society.
    – The Internationale Freimaurer Lexicon Vienna 1932 said Trotsky “came to Bolshevism through the study of freemasonry”
    – Trotsky joined Bnai-Brith 1917, he was already a Misraim-Memphis member
    – Churchill stated in illustrated Sunday Herald Feb 8, 1920 said “Trotsky is an Illumanist”
    – Trotsky was a member of the Shriner Lodge, for masons of 32 degree or higher.

    I certainly would never assume that I know more about Trotsky than you, and perhaps I do exaggerate. But as long as you ignore the role of freemasonry in history over the last 300 years then it is likely that it is you who are exaggerating about history by ignoring and covering up for the “hidden hand”.

    • Agree: DESERT FOX
    • Replies: @Ron Unz
    , @Wally
    , @Anon
  133. Anonymous[190] • Disclaimer says:
    @Charlies

    So why didn’t they just form a Jewish rightwing? That’s what the Neocons eventually did some decades later.

  134. Seraphim says:
    @Benjy

    You may find in the sycophantic book of Michael Ignatieff about the “witness to a century, the most important liberal philosopher of his time”: “Isaiah Berlin: a life”, a characterization of Einstein which ‘deeply appealed’ to the “witness to the century”: ‘he managed to reconcile a consistent internationalism and a hatred of nationalism with a steady commitment to Zionism’!
    Berlin was the same.

  135. @follyofwar

    I am not a Catholic theologian but I think Jones would say you have rejected Logos and need to take steps to put your soul in order.

    The Alt Right cannot define itself in isolation from the battle over traditional values. While many younger people on the Alt Right share (up to a point) the left’s views on religion and sexual morality, they cannot share the left’s views on race and immigration, and are led by distrust of the establishment to endorse gun rights. Moreover, what mostly motivates the left is the desire to destroy Christendom and, vaguely speaking, Anglo-Saxon or European culture (we see lately that it’s not really about hating the rich.) The people in whom those values are most deeply ensconced are lower to middle class white people. So, the defense of beleaguered white people is, de facto, the defense of social conservatives. Moreover, the electoral strategy of the Democrat Party is to enlist nonwhites and sexual minorities in a Rainbow Coalition that will elect politicians happy to carry out the cultural projects of socially left-wing Jewish donors. All these factors conspire to make a race-realistic anti-immigration atheist libertine side with church-going white rustics as against the anti-white atheist libertines of the trendy suburbs.
    I conclude that for the Alt Right to have a base it will have to defend socially conservative positions that are under attack, and the people who will be happiest and most effective doing that are likely to be people who can go about it sincerely, i.e. people who, even if they are not personally religious, are at least sympathetic to religion, sexual restraint, and so on.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  136. Benjy says:
    @Ron Unz

    My quote from above:

    “Jacob Schiff’s grandson admitted that his grandfather had given about $20 million”.

    As a jew, perhaps you are overly sensitive about jews being “falsely” charged. Trotsky would have had me executed for this, along with 10 members of my family. Even if were true.

    To me, they are all jew bankers. Whether I can document whether Warburg, who was profiting from both sides of the war, like Rothschild and Schiff, actually gave Trotsky the gold, this is not the real issue to me. By staging the coup d’etat of forcing the Federal Reserve onto America on Christmas eve, 1913, all the Jewish bankers joined into a conspiracy to steal the United States from its rightful owners, and they have accomplished that.

    By staging WWI and WWII they have destroyed Europe, Western Culture, and have almost completed their genocide. I suspect that you, Ron Unz, as a Southern Californian, are going to be severely impacted by this in the not to distance future. Even Montecito or whatever gated community that you live.

    To quote James Joyce:

    “avoid the facts, downplay them if concession is absolutely necessary, and move the discussion into abstractions and sophistry.”

    • Replies: @Ron Unz
  137. Asagirian says: • Website

    The idea of Judeo-Bolshevism is problematic like Judeo-Christianity.

    While Karl Marx was Jewish and many early communists were Jewish, they were not happy Jews. They were secular Jews, and many had hostile feelings toward Jews and Jewishness. Marx said something like money is to Jews like what alcohol is to the Irish. Marx believed that the only way to resolve the Jewish Question was to get rid of capital. A kind of Economic Prohibition. Jews, more than any other people, become intoxicated with capital as Jews have a long history as financiers, middlemen, and money changers.

    So, the early communists were both Jewish in ethnicity and anti-Jewish in agenda. But this could be said of early Christians as well. All early Christians were Jewish, and for a long time, the majority of Christians were Jews. One might even speak of Judeo-Christianity back then because the movement was so heavily Jewish and grew out of the tradition.
    The Early Christians were both Jewish and anti-Jewish because they espoused a new faith that grew out of Judaism but also against it. As Christianity was a universal faith, once the fire spread and caught on with the gentiles, Christianity came to be dominated and defined by gentile converts than their children than by the descendants of the Jewish early Christians.
    Same was true of communism. Given its universal character, communism was bound to attract many more non-Jews than Jews in the long run: China, Vietnam, Cuba, Angola, etc.
    And when Israel allied with the US and when communist Jews began to feel stirrings of Zionist pride(or were suspected of such), the hammer came down hard on Jewish communists in elite positions…. though, all in all, your average Jew in the USSR or Eastern Europe was probably better off than your average goyim, not least due to higher IQ, adeptness at economic bootlegging, and connections to the Jews in the West(however tenuous).

    In the early yrs of Christianity, Jewish Christians were persecuted by Jews and disdained by pagans. But eventually, they did managed to capture the imagination of pagan Rome, and then the movement took on a life of its own.
    In the 19th and 20th century, Jewish capitalists had an ambiguous relation to communism. On the one hand, they saw it as a threat, as did all capitalists. But they also saw it as a useful weapon against the much loathed Russians. But then, foreign policy is always a game of ‘enemy of your enemy is your friend’. FDR allied with Stalin against Hitler. Nixon met with Mao against USSR.
    Also, with the fading of religious faith, many young idealistic Jews decided to join the messianic movement of communism as their ticket into larger society. Judaism no longer had much meaning for them, and Christianity was too much the faith of the enemy; furthermore, Christianity was also fading in the modern world.

    Communism was a double-edged sword for Jews in USSR. They had much to gain as many were in elite positions and as the New Order outlawed discrimination on the basis of religion and ethnicity. Also, communism destroyed 50,000 churches and wiped out much of the Orthodox clergy that regarded by Jews as ‘antisemitism central’.
    But communism also put limits and obstacles to Jewish power just as Marx had intended. Without capital, there is only so much that Jews can do.
    As communism was egalitarian, it prevented any group from rising too high or accumulating much wealth. Also, the egalitarian ethos was bound to lead to massive affirmative action that later came to favor non-Jews over smarter Jews. Also, the humanist-moralist element of communism made it difficult for Jews to use vice industry, gambling, advertising, drugs, and pornography to corrupt and control the goy masses.
    So, in the long run, Jews lost than gained more under communism. Jewish Power came to inherit the world through mastery of capitalism in the US, without the backing of which Zionism would have rested on shaky grounds.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    , @Al Liguori
  138. Ron Unz says:
    @Benjy

    I certainly would never assume that I know more about Trotsky than you, and perhaps I do exaggerate.

    Well, it’s nice that you seem to have acknowledged that you exaggerated the revolutionary funding that Trotsky took back to Russia from NYC by far more than 10,000%.

    But as long as you ignore the role of freemasonry in history over the last 300 years then it is likely that it is you who are exaggerating about history by ignoring and covering up for the “hidden hand”.

    I’ll admit I don’t really know anything about the Masons. But I was reading a pretty good 2017 book on the Russian Revolution by Seth McMeekin, a very mainstream historian favorably reviewed in the NYT, and he seemed to think there was quite a lot of evidence that leading Masons probably a crucial role in the February Revolution, so that seems likely. However, I’m not persuaded that the Masons were much of a factor in the Mensheviks or SRs, let alone Lenin’s Bolsheviks.

  139. Anonymous[190] • Disclaimer says:
    @Benjy

    Don’t pay him any mind, Benjy. He’s just our resident libertarian.

    • Replies: @Wally
  140. RJJCDA says:

    Given the history of antisemitism, in a chapter in the book REDOUBTS I asked the question: WHY has it existed in the past and arguably so today? I gave three possible answers:

    1) Jews are uniquely virtuous and all others are evil.
    2) Jews are uniquely evil and all others are virtuous.
    3) X

    I believe that X is the answer, but I don’t know what X is.

    • Replies: @Anon
  141. Mulegino1 says:
    @follyofwar

    Well, it depends upon the nature and degree of the rejection of Christ/Logos.

    Catholics, Orthodox, and Protestants affirm the Divinity of Christ, and the latter and a good portion of the former reverence His mother.

    Muslims for the most part affirm that Jesus/Issa was the Messiah of the Israelites and Judeans, and set up Miriam/Mary, His mother, in a very high place- even if they reject the idea of His divinity.

    Many eminent scholars have given Jesus a very high place in history, even if they do not accept His divinity, from a moral and philosophical perspective.

    Many devout spokesmen for the Vedic tradition also consider Christ/Logos as a very high avatar, even if they deny His uniqueness.

    The Talmudist Jews, on the other hand, not only reject the Logos/Christ but revile Him in the ugliest and most subterranean fashion- as did their spiritual forebears in the Sanhedrin. If you reject Him in
    this fashion and even blaspheme Him- then yes, I would say that this amounts to proudly bearing the standards of Hell.

    The Jewish rejection of Christ is based upon their spiritual ugliness and hardness of heart. As children of the Devil and the congregation of the Synagogue of Satan, this is not mere unbelief, but deliberate, malign and diabolical rejection of Goodness itself.

    • Replies: @Mulegino1
    , @Anonymous
  142. Anonymous[190] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anonymous

    Or it could just be those evil goyim “scapegoating” those nice jews that dindu nuffin.

    Ha, ha! I like that one. We should call them the dinJews.

  143. Ron Unz says:
    @Benjy

    “Jacob Schiff’s grandson admitted that his grandfather had given about $20 million”.

    Sure, I’d certainly been well aware of the Schiff claim for many, many years and indeed discussed it at considerable length in my article last year, which I’d already linked upthread:

    http://www.unz.com/runz/american-pravda-the-bolshevik-revolution-and-its-aftermath/

    As I pointed out, there’s quite a lot of contemporaneous support for the claim, so it’s probably correct, though it seems likely that the details may have gotten garbled by Schiff’s grandson, who was passing down a family story decades later.

    For example, I very much doubt the full $20M came only from Schiff himself, rather than from Schiff together with a group of his friends and relatives among the Jewish banking elite in NYC. Also, I’d think it much more likely that the figure refers to the *total* money given to all the various Russian revolutionary groups during the couple of decades leading up to 1917. After all, it’s fully acknowledged that Schiff was the main financial backer of the initially successful 1905 Revolution.

    Finally, the claim is that the money was given to the Bolsheviks, but I really tend to doubt this. Until their successful 1917 coup, the Bolsheviks were relatively unknown outside Russia, and Trotsky was far higher-profile, given his central role in the 1905 Revolution. Why would Schiff and his friends have funded the non-Jewish Lenin, who was obscurely living in Switzerland, rather than the Jewish Trotsky, who was a leading revolutionary figure (temporarily) living in NYC? Since Trotsky soon enough became a top Bolshevik leader, the history got a little confused.

    • Replies: @Wally
    , @Anon
    , @Seraphim
    , @Anon
  144. Wally says:
    @Rational

    Speaking of “Jewish Mental Illness”.

    Scientists Discover Gene That Predisposes Ashkenazi Jews to Schizophrenia
    Variations of the DNST3 gene make Ashkenazi Jews 40 percent more likely to develop schizophrenia and similar diseases.
    ’: https://www.haaretz.com/.premium-ashkenazi-gene-increases-schizophrenia-1.5294333

    Does the strong Jew tendency towards mental illness assist in their ‘holocaust’ : fantasies?:https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=12239

  145. Wally says:
    @Ron Unz

    said:
    “Why would Schiff and his friends have funded the non-Jewish Lenin, who was obscurely living in Switzerland”

    “non-Jewish Lenin”? Maybe not.

    Lenin’s Jewish roots confirmed: https://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4073133,00.html

    Thanks.

  146. Wally says:
    @Anonymous

    And your problem with libertarians is … ?

    • Replies: @Achmed E. Newman
  147. Anonymous[190] • Disclaimer says:
    @jack daniels

    I conclude that for the Alt Right to have a base it will have to defend socially conservative positions that are under attack, and the people who will be happiest and most effective doing that are likely to be people who can go about it sincerely, i.e. people who, even if they are not personally religious, are at least sympathetic to religion, sexual restraint, and so on.

    I strongly agree. The main problem, though, is will religious people ever return the favor. A lot of them would sell out the alt-right in a hurry if they thought it might buy them some ‘respectability’ from TPTB. Moreover, a lot of Christians get really weird if you defend their beliefs yet don’t share them. It seems they’re just not comfortable with the concept of having allies. Either you’re with them 100% or you’re against them, seems to be the thinking.

    Personally, I see that as the main barrier to an effective alliance.

    • Replies: @jack daniels
  148. gregor says:

    Bbbbbbbut I read on Wikipedia that Judeo-Bolshevism is an “antisemitic canard”?

    But what is really presented here, of course, is the standard structure of Jewish historiography: avoid the facts, downplay them if concession is absolutely necessary, and move the discussion into abstractions and sophistry.

    That is on a good day. As far as I can tell, the preferred methods are censorship, deplatforming, and ad hominem attacks. Expanding on that last point, a common tactic is to transform basic factual and historical questions into questions of motivation. If you say, let’s look at the evidence regarding X, they won’t tend to engage directly; rather, they will question why it is you’re so interested in the topic.

    Truly understanding the hopes, fears and motivations of any particular Jewish revolutionary in all their irreducible complexity is ultimately a task best undertaken by a biographer.

    It’s telling to compare this “nuanced” view of Jewish behavior with the crude caricature of the antisemitic White Gentile (in both medieval and modern times).

  149. Wally says:
    @Benjy

    said:
    “versus wild cowboy commentors”

    Who are your “wild cowboy commentors” and what do they say that is an issue for you? Please be specific.

    Thanks.

    http://www.codoh.com

    • Replies: @Benjy
  150. Anonymous[190] • Disclaimer says:
    @Asagirian

    That’s a very intriguing comment! What if someday all the Jews turn militantly against anything communist, even though communism began as an off-shoot of their own religion? After all, that’s the history of Christianity in a nutshell. Will lightening strike twice?

    And you’re probably right about Marx: he did see capitalism as being largely a Jewish problem. In fact, he reminds me just a bit of another famous Jew who once knocked over the tables of the money changers in Old Jerusalem …

    • Replies: @Anon
    , @Al Liguori
  151. @onebornfree

    1]“It probably would get better if all liars changed their ways, but there is no chance that they will.”

    Which was basically my point, regardless of whether or not they are jews lying or not. It makes no difference – [so get over it].

    I know that was one of your points and I was affirming it. So what’s to get over?

    whether or not they are jews lying or not

    That is exactly why I used the word “all.” That means all, and therefore includes Jews. That means the original statement was true. It especially pertains to today to those who call themselves Jews because they, whether Jews or not, control our very corrupt and vicious government.

  152. His works, often with pitifully thin evidence of wider reading, portrayed anti-Semitism as “a primarily Western phenomenon.”

    Did a quick google right after reading this, and seems to be the general perception that there is no antisemitism in India, at least not from the majority Hindu. And neither there have been persecutions according to what I have found. Tried to find any material either debunking this myth or explaining why this is a fact in TOO, without much success. Nothing in the original TOO article by the same author critic of this one Mr Langmuir.

    Anyone here kind enough to point me to some (reliable if possible) sources debunking or explaining this curious fact?

    Maybe Mr Langdon could write a rigorous article about it, or maybe it has been written already, but I am unable to find it?

  153. Wally says:
    @Commentator Mike

    1. What you try to define as capitalism is not, it is a government manipulated economy, and that is what we have. Of course it’s a mess.
    Still another strawmen from you,

    2. I did nothing of the sort.

    Communism does not look good on paper.
    Still another strawmen from you,

  154. @Commentator Mike

    Modern capitalism is simply legalised loan sharking and debt slavery. There are no free markets, fair competition, or whatever else are the principles of this utopian capitalist system you all believe in. It’s all about getting everyone hooked on debt to service interest on their loans and controlling markets, controlling just about everything. And it’s not as if the money they lend you, paper or electronic, is real in terms of any value. I don’t know what those smart economists are all about.

    You wrote that? It’s beautiful! Perfect.

    • Agree: DESERT FOX
    • Replies: @Commentator Mike
  155. Judeophile books by well-paid shabbatz goyim like the one reviewed here are no doubt of vast interest.

    But

    on the Jewish-communist nexus, why not take the word of the Jewish “activists” themselves?

    cf. (((Judy Kaplan))) and (((Linn Shapiro)))’s anthology of short memoirs by New Left boomers,

    Red Diapers: Growing Up on the Communist Left (Chicago, 1998).

    of the c. 50 confessional memoirs, more than 40 (80%) are by Jews and Jewesses.

    the terrible cohencidences…

    they just keep on piling up.

  156. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @jacques sheete

    There’s a lot of information in university libraries. They don’t trash old books the way public libraries do. Any university will give you a card for a couple hundred dollars a year to join Friends of the Library. Best you can read many versions of the same event from anti communists to pro communists

    • Replies: @jacques sheete
  157. Anon[369] • Disclaimer says:
    @RJJCDA

    Given the history of antisemitism, in a chapter in the book REDOUBTS I asked the question: WHY has it existed in the past and arguably so today? I gave three possible answers:

    1) Jews are uniquely virtuous and all others are evil.
    2) Jews are uniquely evil and all others are virtuous.
    3) X

    I believe that X is the answer, but I don’t know what X is.

    That seems like a reasonable conclusion.

    However, I don’t believe that it is correct.

    Nor would I agree that the term “virtuous” best serves the exercise. However, I cannot come up with a sufficiently better suggestion at the moment (largely for lack of trying) and so lets work with it. I know the spirit of what you are attempting to state.

    The first problem with your three part rhetorical synthesis is that you are comparing two incomparable political concepts: Jews and “others”.

    The problem with comparing these two concepts is that one is well defined and the other is specifically defined only by its lack of Judaic character. Otherwise, “others” is politically amorphous. Its like comparing an orange and “not orange”.

    But before we start better defining “others”, lets first define “Jews”. I’ll try to be concise.

    “Jews” are those who are accepted by (via maternal lineage) and support,

    with ethnic affinity or more active means, the Jewish ethnic group.

    In this way, secular Jews can be and are Jews. However, the sociopolitical core of the accepted ethnic group is defined by its adherence to Judaism, which is the “religion” of those who are accepted to the Jewish ethnic group and who follow and believe in the Jewish Torah.

    What is the Jewish Torah?

    [MORE]

    The Jewish Torah is primarily a group of active myths and law, spread over the Tanakh (Old Testament), Midrash-Talmud, and Kabbalah that advise:

    1. how Jews can maintain the racial and cultural integrity of their ethnic group against insults by outside tribes,

    2. how and why Jews must dispossess those tribes from their lands,

    3. why Jews are commanded to genocide those tribes

    4. why Jews are commanded to destroy the religions of those tribes

    5. why the remaining members of those outside tribes will be genocided in the Jewish judgement day (the deaths of their impure souls purifying the Earth to leave only the purity of Jewish souls)

    and

    4. why Jews are only considered to be human, with all non-Jews considered to be the equivalent of literal animals.

    That is the absolute core of the Jewish religion.

    The Jewish religion is nothing other than weighty political instruction for genocide, real and pure racial supremacy, and world domination.

    That is whom you describe as possibly a group that is not “uniquely evil”.

    With all due respect, your assumption is a stretch; especially given the idiosyncratic Jewish insistence on maintaining both isolated sociopolitical integrity and political power in every nation outside of their own. Preferences that are further contextualized by what I detailed to you about the content of their religion. Again, (more than) a stretch.

    Now let’s look at the “others”.

    The others tended to be mostly working class plebs in Europe with no such cohesive genocidal ethnic plan for world domination. Generally, they tended to be vague nationalists who became tired of the special privileges, political duplicity, and sociopolitical undermining that the Jews feel that they are entitled to according to their political (excuse me “religious”) documents. After they grew tired of all of the aforementioned, the vague nationalism of the plebs became less vague in defense. Rinse and repeat. That’s the history of the Jews in Europe, in a nutshell.

    This is why what passes as reason when making sweeping moral probability assessments about non-Jews will not have outcome validity when applying it to the Jews. Jews are not like the others, which they proclaim over and over to themselves.

    Last, what you are missing is that Jews have no inherent right to be in every nation. The reason that they claim that they do is because that is what their book tells them, to the explicit end of destroying that nation. This debate relies on the presupposition that Jews have to be everywhere and that we need to get along or tolerate them. That is Judaism, and it is the furthest thing from the truth.

    Jeremiah 30:11

    11 I am with you and will save you,’
    declares the Lord.
    ‘Though I completely destroy all the nations
    among which I scatter you,
    I will not completely destroy you.
    I will discipline you but only in due measure;
    I will not let you go entirely unpunished.’

  158. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @Ron Unz

    Conventional wisdom is that the German British Baptists Rockefellers were as heavily involved as the Schiffs and others with eyes on getting hold in some of the Baku oil and other resources

  159. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @Ron Unz

    Masons were big in the 1820s Decembrist attempted revolution in Russia and most all 18th 19th century revolutions, so it’s very possible masons were heavily involved in the Russian revolution

    But if McMeekin was favorably reviewed in the NYTimes… well consider the source.

    There were lots of intellectuals and upper class meddlers involved. Those milieus are a favorite place for masons.

  160. Mulegino1 says:
    @Mulegino1

    Sorry, I should have written “the former, and a good portion of the latter.” Luther had a great devotion to the Virgin, and even Calvin and Zwingli reverenced the “ever Virgin Mary” as did, apparently, John Wesley. The degradation of the Theotokos/Blessed Virgin is a historical novelty brought about by the miserable low church denominations of Protestantism, many of whom have very little doctrinal or devotional affinity with historical Christianity.

    • Replies: @Anon
  161. Seraphim says:
    @Ron Unz

    The friends (and relatives) of Schiff were the Warburgs. The recently immigrated to America Paul Warburg was one of the original founders of the Federal Reserve and his brother Felix married the daughter of Jacob Schiff. In the same time he was the brother of Max Warburg (of the banking family from Hamburg), who chose to stay in Germany and was an advisor to Kaiser Wilhelm. Their aims coincided, from slightly different perspectives: the elimination of Russia from the war, the ‘termination’ of Tsarism and the emancipation of the Jews from Russia. It is undeniable that plans to use the socialist movements in Russia have been hatched both in New York and in the German High Command.
    At the Peace Conference 1918, Paul Warburg represented the interests of USA and his brother Max the interests of Germany.

    • Replies: @jacques sheete
  162. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:

    Here’s something about the communist party of the USA. It was founded by NYC immigrant Jews. One founder was Julius Hammer major bootlegger, physician and father of Armand Hammer. The language of the party was Yiddish, not English and except for John Reed and a few other looney lefty rich kids was almost all Jewish.

    Armand Hamner went to Russia in the 1920s to liquidate and sell for cash what the Jews bilshies confiscated from the non communist Russians.

    Around 1933 Stalin analysed why American communism was a failure despite the depression and the active labor movement. Stalin figured that the average English speaking American just wasn’t going to join a party run by Yiddish speaking Brooklyn New York Jews.

    So Stalin made 4 laws for CPUSA

    1 40 percent quota on Jews
    2 Chairman of party absolutely not be a Jew hence Gus Hall
    3 Party headquarters not be in NYC but in Midwest, Chicago
    4 Official language of the party and all publications be English and the Yiddish speakers learn English.

    Even so, party membership, CPUSA defenders and fellow travelers remained heavily Jewish

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    , @Wizard of Oz
  163. KenH says:

    Historical revisionism especially pertaining to the Bolshevik revolution, WWII and the so called Jewish holocaust has really meted out a beating to Jewish victimology and the Jewish narrative of events in the 20th century and I’ve noticed a campaign by Jews and their lackeys of counter revisionism in an attempt to revise the revisionists.

  164. @jacques sheete

    Yes, my own words, in that other thread I mentioned.

    • Replies: @Che Guava
  165. DogDo says:

    There are some well-documented instances for which a medieval Jewish community requested of a town ruler that a wall be built establishing a Jewish ghetto in order to protect the Jews from the main gentile population. Ghettos arose to reflect the interests of both Jews and gentiles.

    • Replies: @Anon
  166. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @Mulegino1

    Calvin and Knox denied that Christ was God and the existence of the Holy Spirit. Calvin and Knox claimed that Mary the Mother of Jesus who wasn’t God was nothing but a pagan goddess. Both Knox and Calvin proclaimed

    “ There is but ONE God and that is the God of Israel”

    Calvin and his puritans and Knox’s Scots Presbyterians were the epitome of low church Protestants. The English puritans also denied that Jesus was God and denigrated Mary as a pagan papist idol.

    The pilgrims and puritans of early America denied that Jesus was God, the existence of the Holy Spirit and denigrated Mary as a papist pagan idol.

    Other than Lutherans and Church of England, most of the early Protestants were wanna be jews, one God, the God of Israel Jesus a man not God, no such thing as Holy Spirit and Mary a papist pagan idol the epitome of what was wrong with the Church of Rome

    What does religion have to do with the question of Jewish communism anyway?

    • Replies: @Mulegino1
  167. Alfred says:
    @animalogic

    It takes no imagination to realise that there were no Jews in the Imperial Russian landowning and aristocratic classes.

    IMHO, that definitely inspired a lot of envy in the urban classes – which is where the Jews belonged (and still belong). The urban non-Jews did not have the same reasons for envy as they considered their rulers to be the “lucky ones.” They Jewish ones knew that they were excluded.

    • Replies: @Anon
  168. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @Ron Unz

    Both Trotsky and Lenin were funded by the government of Germany and Jewish and non Jewish businesses and bankers.

    German government purpose was internal subversion to defeat Russia. Bankers and businesses was looting of resources.

    Plenty of blame.

  169. @Anon

    Thanks for the tip.

    Where I live I can access books and articles from all over the place through my local library by requesting things on line. The articles appear on line so I would never have to leave my computer to obtain the info. The books arrive at the local library. Another great source of info is UNZ.org which I have also used quite a bit.

    I think he was asking specifically about the Holodomor, and like I said, I do not have the answer unfortunately.

    The link I provided has many purportedly first hand letters and the ones I’ve read are so heart breaking that it’s difficult to read more than a few.

  170. But what is really presented here, of course, is the standard structure of Jewish historiography: avoid the facts, downplay them if concession is absolutely necessary, and move the discussion into abstractions and sophistry.

    “Jewish”? Have you ever tried to be with a woman beyond physically, Joyce?

    • Replies: @jacques sheete
  171. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anonymous

    Marx noted that Jews tended to be capitalists more than being employees. He also noted that most of the big capitalists who caused all the problems of society were non Jews.

    • Replies: @jacques sheete
  172. Mulegino1 says:
    @Anon

    Calvin and Knox denied that Christ was God and the existence of the Holy Spirit. Calvin and Knox claimed that Mary the Mother of Jesus who wasn’t God was nothing but a pagan goddess.

    You are mistaken. Calvin did belief in the Trinity and the Divinity of Christ, although some of his Christology may be considered a type of neo-nestorianism. No, Calvin did not belief that Mary was a pagan goddess. He, as the precursor of low church Christianity, did not believe in the Catholic and Orthodox doctrines of the intercession of the saints.

    What does religion have to do with Judeo-Bolshevism? Quite a lot, actually. Jewish directed communism has always hated and persecuted those Christian Churches based upon liturgy, sacraments and the veneration of the saints (Catholicism, Orthodoxy) far more than the low church denominations. This was the case in Russia, Spain, Hungary, Romania, Mexico (philo-Bolshevism of Calles), etc.

    • Agree: Cleburne
    • Replies: @Anon
  173. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @Alfred

    Lots of Jews owned farm land and hired the local Russians to work it. Some were peasant farmers either as owners or tenants. Others were gentleman farmers who only helped the workers at harvest when all hands were needed. That was a tradition among the Gentry and aristocrat farmers

    • Replies: @anonymous
  174. Anon[248] • Disclaimer says:
    @Benjy

    You sound like someone whom a term such as “Ur-lodges” wouldn’t be unheard-of to.

    • Replies: @Benjy
  175. Hibernian says:
    @nik1975

    Many people stand in judgement of Nazism without having read one word of Mein Kampf.

    • Replies: @jacques sheete
  176. @Ron Unz

    Ron,

    G. Edward Griffin’s book on the establishment of the Federal Reserve System : “The creature from Jekyll Island” Is a superb piece of history and explains beyond denial why and how so much of the wealth generated by the astonishing invention and productivity of the past century has ended up in so few hands.

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
  177. Hibernian says:
    @Benjy

    “In Jewish families the children observe their parents deceitful split personalities from their first moments of consciousness.”

    All people are tribal and everyone presents a different face to the world at large then the one they present to members of their own tribe.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    , @benjy
    , @anonymous
  178. Hibernian says:
    @jacques sheete

    My (American born) Polish Catholic grandfather changed his name. No one will think a person named Saypol is a Mayflower descendant, and most people realize that Irving Saypol is a Jewish name.

  179. FB says: • Website

    Didn’t make it past the first, plodding paragraph…in today’s fascist Amerikkka the magic combination is to equate Judaism with communism…the perfect combination of the two big bugbears…LOL

  180. Anon[331] • Disclaimer says:
    @DogDo

    Ghettos arose to reflect the interests of both Jews and gentiles.

    And any Jewish presence whatsoever, which predates those ghettos, arose to reflect the sole interests of the Jews (and any individual goyim they were able to bribe for entry and protection).

    Gentile defensive action is an attempt to stem global group loss that is the result of Jewish presence.

    Whereas Jewish action, to include their very presence outside of any Jewish nation, is usually for gain and not defense. To include a stubborn willfullness to vacate the nations, across the globe, who repeatedly object to the presence of the international Jewish nation.

    Jews love to ascribe benefit or fault to gentile defensive action that is trying to stem loss as a result of Jewish presence.

    Anything to try to make such gentile defense seem like other than something that casts Jews as the cause of loss.

    I’d suggest that this is not an inaccurate way to summarize a large part of our history together.

    The crucial part that would be left out of that succinct summary would be why defense is consistently required against Jews. The answer is found in their religious texts.

  181. Hibernian says:
    @Reg Cæsar

    The poverty of the South, the fact that many older Southerners in 1932 could remember the Civil War or at least Reconstruction, and Roosevelt’s relative timidity on racial issues, explain why they didn’t rebel against him.

    • Replies: @Anon
  182. Asagirian says: • Website

    Islam > Homomania > Christianity.

    Go Islam! Just get rid of silly veils and cousin marriage. And hating on dogs.

  183. I find this discussion deeply troubling…to the point that I feel we have no chance of surviving the next scheduled reset. Today I read that ISIS handed over 50 tons of gold to the US. Not stolen US gold, but stolen Syrian gold! What immediately came to mind was a picture of a vault in Iraq full of gold and a room full of gold in Libya. The caption on the pictures read, “What happened to Iraq’s Gold”? It was never heard from in the news again. What happened to it?

    Today, not once did anyone suggest that the gold would be returned to Syria. They did say that ISIS was giving the stolen gold to the US in exchange for their freedom. I guess the US plans to keep the stolen property.

    You’re probably thinking, “What does this have to do with the Jewish Bolshevick Revolution”? One only has to pay attention to the players, to realize the same group is responsible for what’s happening today. Jack Bernstein writes in his book Zionists are not Jews:

    [MORE]

    Throughout their history, Polish and Russian Ashkenazi Jews practiced communism/socialism and worked to have their ideas implemented in these countries.

    By the late 1800s significant numbers of these communist/socialist Jews were found in Germany, the Balkans and eventually all over Europe. Because of their interference in the social and governmental affairs of Russia, they became the target of persecution by the Czars. Because of this, migration of these communist/socialist oriented Jews began. Some went to Palestine; some to Central and South America; and a large number of them came to the U.S.

    New York/Moscow/Tel Aviv Triangle

    At this point, you may be confused, Israel and the Soviets are ideological allies — both follow the ideas of Karl Marx, so both are communist/socialist. Yet, the Soviets supplied military equipment to the Arabs — Israel’s enemies; and at the same time, the Soviet Union’s enemy, the United States, was arming Israel.

    To understand the treachery which Zionist/Bolshevik Jews are capable and to understand the treachery which took place before and during the 1973 War, I must explain the New York/Moscow/Tel Aviv Triangle. To do so, it is necessary to go back a few years in history.

    A heavy migration of Jews from Russia to America started in 1831. Most of these were communist Jews. So many of these communist/Bolshevik Jews settled in New York City that New York has been referred to as ‘Moscow on the Hudson’.

    It has been pointed out, and with good reason, that decisions regarding communist policies come not from Moscow, but from New York City. Whether this is a fact or not is immaterial. What is important is the fact that there is a close tie between the Zionist/Bolshevik Jews in New York City and the Zionist/Bolshevik Jews in Moscow, and extending to include the Zionist/Bolshevik Jews who dominate Israel’s government.

    The Zionist power over the U.S. Government in Washington, D.C. stems from the Zionist/Bolsheviks centered in New York City. It is from New York that orders go out to the vast Zionist network all over the U.S. — a network that influences the economic and political affairs of not only our federal government, but nearly all, if not all, state governments, and to a great extent the governments of the larger and even medium sized cities. This power of the Zionist/Bolshevik Jews over the U.S. makes the New York leg of the New York/Moscow/Tel Aviv Triangle a tremendous influence over communist policies.

    In viewing the 1973 War, most people, and it seems most Arabs, are of the impression that since Soviet Russia sold equipment to Egypt and other Arab countries, the Soviets were in support of the Arabs in the 1973 War. This is a false impression. To understand that this is the result of more deceit on the part of Israel and the Soviet Union, you must be aware of the Golda Meir-Stalin/Kaganovich Pact.

    Golda Meir had been born in Russia, grew up in Milwaukmee, Wisconsin and in 1921 migrated to Israel. In 1949, Golda Meir became Israel’s first ambassador to the Soviet Union.

    Representing Israel, Ambassador Golda Meir, a Bolshevik Jewess, met with two representatives of the Soviet Union: Kaganovich, a Bolshevik Jew and Stalin who had married a Bolshevik Jewess. They made a secret agreement — a pact.

    ISRAEL’S PART OF THE PACT WAS:
    1. Israel would not allow any Western country, especially the U.S. to build military bases on Israeli territory.
    2. Israel would allow an official communist party to function freely in Israel.
    3. Israel would not make any agreement to solve the Palestinian problem.
    4. Israel would influence world Jewry, especially in the U.S. to have Western Powers adopt a policy of favoring Israel over the Arabs.
    5. Israel was to continue its Marxist economic policies and prevent any free-enterprise tendencies.

    SOVIET UNION’S PART OF THE PACT WAS:
    1. The Soviets would institute a pro-Arab policy solely as a camouflage for its true intention, which was to furnish aid to the Arabs, but never enough to enable the Arabs to destroy Israel.
    2. The Soviets would open the gates of Soviet satellite countries to Jewish immigration to Israel. Should this be insufficient, Soviet Russia then would open its own gates to immigration.
    3. The Soviets would absolutely guarantee the security of Israel.

    Trump today announced he would sign a bill into law that would target Universities that allowed students to talk, write or protest against Jews and stop funding. Last week he said he would sign a bill that would make it a crime to says anything against Israel and would seek the death penalty for anti-semetic crimes. Trump continues to ill important government positions with Dual Citizens. These Israelis have made it clear that they are loyal to Israel first. Israel Jewish/Bolshavicks are running your government and you fucking guys are discussing Trosky, Lenin and Stalin!

    The people in the US stand to lose bigtime in this game. Israel and Russia are playing a game that will replace the US with China. I bet that gold stays in the ME. Where is the US gold, you should ask yourself.

  184. @Anon

    Gee, anon, what a wonderful rant ! Full marks for passion.
    Although you could have probably saved a lot of time by just objecting that: Jew’s ARE synonymous with communism.
    Your political sophistication is clearly revealed in views such as:
    “Any assertion to the contrary is born of Neocon (Jewish communist) influence and propaganda”
    Sneaky. Some neo-cons
    were former communists & some were/are Jew’s –therefore neoconservatism as a whole is both Jewish & communist. Easy-peasy. Your implied view that the cult of Dionysis was a jewish conpiracy is also “clever”.
    “Its axiomatic that anyone that successfully identifies with and is accepted as a member (through maternal lineage) by the Jewish ethnic group is Jewish. This is how the Rabbis see it.”
    (glad to see you on board with the rabbis)
    So, your fundamental premise that all jews are “Jews” is difficult to debate.
    “jew” in this view is a totalising concept, completely one dimensional & admitting of no subtlety or nuance. Trotsky & Rothchild are exactly the same.
    A Jew who is secular & totally unconscious of any Jewish culture & society is the same as an active Jewish conspirator seeking to undermine a gentile nation for personal & Jewish profit — why ? Because: “In the Jewish ethnic group, it is irrelevant if Jews are “secular”.” “Irrelevant” ? The (mendacious) concept of “the self hating” jew is no doubt an expression of such irrelevency.
    You are not a bullshit artist per se. What you are is a rabid frothing at the mouth antisemite. You are poison to any attempt at the objective study of the relationship between Jew’s & gentiles. On a more positive note: you are the best kind of friend Israel & it’s Jewish supporters can get — let loose with your kind of shit & the whole hard fought effort to expose real Jewish crimes is delegitimised out of hand. Thanks, a lot.

    • Replies: @Anon
  185. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @Jake

    Excellent discussion of the New England and German 48ers Oberlin and Madison. Remember that the Germans were more into economic socialism and founded the Farmer Labor Party But the Puritans were into racism feminism and pro black activism soon segued into prohibition.

    • Replies: @Jake
  186. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @Hibernian

    The southerners worshipped FDar and his administration partly because they were yellow dog democrats and mostly because his programs alleviated the horrendous malnutrition level poverty.

    Can’t blame all the post civil war poverty on the evil northern capitalists. The southern farmers and businessmen were very happy to exploit the White and black workers and tenant farmers.

    Most of the White southern voters were dirt poor malnourished workers and tenant farmers. They loved FDR. The Congress critters were aware of the communists in FDR’s administration, but as long as the money and assistance programs poured into their districts they didn’t care.

    Plus, the miners controlled many congressional districts and were very militant

  187. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @Mulegino1

    You don’t know what you’re talking about. I know the religion of my 9th great grandparents very well. They were ardent followers of Calvin and Knox.

    Later Protestants finally acknowledged that Jesus was God and that his mother did exist although they ignore her. But for the first 200 years only the Lutherans and the Church of England believed that Jesus was god and the holy trinity

    Jesus is not God “ There is but one God and that is the God of Israel” Mary was a papist pagan idol. Enjoy your ignorance.

    • Replies: @Anon
    , @Mulegino1
    , @Robjil
  188. @J. Gutierrez

    It’s a money-laundering operation, effectively. ISIS is a CIA-Mossad mercenary army. They failed in their primary goal of deposing Assad’s government, so now they’re just trying to limit their losses.

    • Replies: @J. Gutierrez
  189. Again, most Jews were not communists or socialists or whatever. But enough were, and few Jews spoke out against them, that one can distinguish Jew and non-Jew here. If more Jews would honestly acknowledge that there is a reason many non-Jews are hostile towards them (that has nothing to do with blind hatred, and does not require assigning 100% blame to Jews), it would be much easier for there to be peace between people.

    • Replies: @Anon
    , @jack daniels
  190. DanFromCt says:
    @Bloody Bill

    Right. We know resistance to Jewish control, or antiSemitism, is always wrong because Jews acting collectively have never and can never do anything wrong. Or maybe it’s that the rest of us are simply envious of Jewish socio-sexual dysfunction mawkishly displayed as endearing on TV shows like Seinfeld.

  191. @onebornfree

    “Facsist” is not a bad discription of US elites. However, a strong element of Fascism is “national purpose/goals”. At one level you can say the US has nationalist goals: ie US hegemony.
    On another level, the US Elite acts with NO national purpose: the whole Globalist program (especially the off shoring of jobs & whole industries, plus financialisation) has seriously weakened the US. The Globalist program at US national expense was motivated by nothing more than Elite selfishness.

    • Replies: @Beefcake the Mighty
  192. Al Liguori says: • Website
    @Alfred

    Judeo-Christian—the oxymoron
    http://judaism.is/judeo-christian.html

    The Jewish Origins of Islam

    Edouard-Marie Gallez, Le Messie et son prophète: aux origines de l’Islam. Paris: Studia Arabica, dirigée par Marie-Thérèse Urvoy. Tome I: De Qumran à Muhammad. 4th edition, 2012. 523 pp. 35 Euros. Tome II: Du Muhammad des Califes au Muhammad de l’histoire. 2010. Pp 574. 39 Euros.

    Reviewed by Anne Barbeau Gardine, Culture Wars, February 2018.

    http://culturewars.com/2018/Gardinerreview.htm

  193. @Asagirian

    It is well worth examining a corollary of Judaism’s hermeneutic of deceit, “Chameleon Judaism,” a term coined by Michael Hoffman to encapsulate Judaism’s propensity for misdirection, disguise, and false flags. In context of Judeo-Communism, a key deceit is that Marx was an atheist, so wasn’t really a “Jew.” An alternate deceit, based on a single poem of Marx is that he was a satanist (as if the synagogue of Satan isn’t satanist). In fact, Marx was from a solid line of orthodox rabbis. Tribal apologists pretend that Marx apostatized, but Marx was actually a disciple of Rabbi Moses Hess who developed Communism to destroy Christianity. There is an entire chapter on Rabbi Hess in Hoffman’s tome Judaism Discovered (one of the hundreds of books “burned” by Bezos’ Amazon). Marx affectionately called Rabbi Hess, “my communist rabbi.”

    The deceit of “atheistic” Communism (“antisemitism” was a capital crime in the USSR) meshes with another old trick designed to gain plausible deniability for the tribe. Having been expelled from hundreds of nations, principalities, and city-states because of their crimes against humanity (and even simple treason like, during the times of the Reconquista, the “Jews” who opened city gates at night to allow entry for Muslims to cut the throats of Christian families asleep in bed), the tribe eventually perfected the art of false flags. They have disguised themselves as “Portuguese” slavers, Young “Turks,” “Russian” mafia, “Austrian” economists, “atheistic” Communism, “Hollywood” pornographers, Marranos, Dönmeh, “neocons,” “international” financiers, etc. All these disguises of chameleon Judaism are quintessentially talmudic—derivative of the deceitful exhortation of Moed Kattan 17a that teaches Jews that when they are tempted to do evil, they should disguise themselves, then do their evil “in another city.” The Talmud is full of corollary instructions to do evil against gentiles providing there is no blowback on the tribe.

    They are perpetrators in many disguises: http://judaism.is/perpetrators.html

    • Replies: @Benjy
  194. Jake says:
    @Wally

    I also do not try to prove that the Red Army intentionally waged war on civilians assumed to be religiously conservative.

    Here is a nice fact for you that marks how thoroughly philoSemitic the UK was before that WASP disease took total control of the US: Winston Churchill told Russian White General Anton Denikin that the purported anti-Semitism of the Whites leadership made it very difficult to get Parliament to back the Whites against the Reds.

    Perhaps you are simply ignorant of the Puritans and the resulting cultural history. Perhaps you know that this alliance based on what flows inherently from Judaizing heresy is necessary to the continuing destruction of what was once Christendom, and you wish it to continue.

  195. @Anonymous

    In his book The Controversy of Zion, p. 59 ff., Douglas Reed drills home that the word “Jew” is a modern word with many ambiguous meanings, but neither by race, residence, nor religion was Jesus Christ a “Jew” and He certainly isn’t a bast-rd of an adulterous wh-re boiling in sh-t as Jews insist.

    The Controversy of Zion
    by Douglas Reed, First Printing 1956
    https://ia600707.us.archive.org/25/items/TheControversyOfZion/TheControversyOfZion.pdf

  196. Jake says:
    @Reg Cæsar

    Lincoln was not alive to hug Stalin, but ‘conservative’ Brit Winston Churchill, who admired Lincoln, did hug Stalin.

    Karl Marx writing in London supported Lincoln and the Union as being on the side of eventual socialist revolution. And American Leftists going to fight for Spanish Marxists did have a Lincoln Brigade.

    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar
  197. @Tyrion 2

    The tribe blames antisemitism on “haters,” “The Gospels,” “Nazis,” “mental illness,” “penis size,” and everything but their own malevolent behavior and supremacist creed.

    • Replies: @Tyrion 2
  198. An advert for a bank here in Cuckstain approaches peak poz.

    A gang of diverse darkies sit around chatting crappy childish riddles. No White Men, just a ninous Nero spouting cringing BS that the (((oven-dodging ARSES))) think is rabbinical cool.

    Then 2 competent White Male Engineers are ordered about by a little girl who learn so much from pur badass wise darky. HTF can a child from a culture full of low IQ, alcohol, heroin, druggies, violence, appalling diet of deep fried chicken & chips, ignorance, primitive medieval sectarianism, ignorance, vulgarity and Irn Bru qualify to tell White Men what to do by this ridiculous haired freak?

    #WhiteMenBoycottBarclaysBank

    PS. Why no description of the ‘2 men’ suspected of Londonistan stabbing by MSM whornalists or pigs??? Trashy mudshark skanks always michieled By Biased Cabalt!!!

  199. Jake says:
    @Anon

    That indeed is a major, and defining, difference. It is the main reason I see no positive value in WASP culture (which is not found in other European cultures) while I do see Continental Germanic Liberalism as being redeemable. Increasingly that seems highly unlikely, but it is possible.

  200. @animalogic

    It depends, I guess. Italian-style fascism might have been amenable to the current US oligarchy, but to the extent that fascism requires (finance) capital to be subordinate to the national interest, and in particular moves against capitalism’s most rapacious manifestations (like the Germans did), then it is truly radical and opposed to liberalism as such (in both its capitalist and socialist guises, formal names aside).

    • Agree: Iris
  201. @Wally

    Can’t believe the question.

    Join the German’s from Russia Heritage Society’s U.S. chapter, http://www.grhs.org/, about $50,00 a year. If you speak German, join the Stuttgart chapter, https://www.bessarabien.de/. There’s also one in Canada and S. Amerika too.

    You can read all you want of first hand accounts from the Black Sea Germans whom were starved to death during this targeted campaign. 96,000 were repatriated to Germany from Bessarabia in Oktober 1940 and the rest that survived the Gulags after operation keelhaul were also repatriated >1950.

    In addition to the first hand accounts, there are numerous books available through the site written by Black Sea German survivors. I even think the U.S. chapter has a dvd film I’ve heard.

    Shocked you understand the lies of the holocaust but know nothing of this starvation campaign, even to the point of questioning it.

    Perhaps along the way read about the Black Sea and Volga Germans, I’ve read 40 million Amerikans are descendants of Black Sea Germans. There’s much they can teach you about the reds vs the whites.

    Prost

    • Replies: @jacques sheete
  202. Anonymous[324] • Disclaimer says:
    @Mulegino1

    The Talmudist Jews, on the other hand, not only reject the Logos/Christ but revile Him in the ugliest and most subterranean fashion- as did their spiritual forebears in the Sanhedrin. If you reject Him in
    this fashion and even blaspheme Him- then yes, I would say that this amounts to proudly bearing the standards of Hell.

    The Jewish rejection of Christ is based upon their spiritual ugliness and hardness of heart. As children of the Devil and the congregation of the Synagogue of Satan, this is not mere unbelief, but deliberate, malign and diabolical rejection of Goodness itself.

    Well said.

  203. @anon

    You discard facts as much as Browning. Look in your mirror and ask yourself why, through the ages and in so many nations, Jews have been prohibited form certain jobs, careers, and political offices, eventually getting tossed from over 70 nations. Why do Jews refuse to discuss the why question. Instead Jews cry anti-Semitism and refuse debates. Now, with the Central Banks of the world firmly in their grip since 1913, the Zionist Jews just turn the screws harder. One day the screw will break, and there will be nowhere to hide. Israel’s treatment of the Palestinians shows their real face to the world and it isn’t a pretty one. No, it’s a perverse and ugly countenance which will lose it all in the end.

  204. Anonymous[324] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anon

    That’s interesting. Thank you.

  205. Parfois1 says:
    @Wally

    I said:

    “Eventually Stalin started the groundwork to remove Jews from the leadership (e.g. introduction of quota system in education and government) but his sudden death put an end to the reforms.”

    You asked:

    “Please present proof of that ‘removal’.”

    It is well known that a quota system was applied in many aspects of political and social life in the Soviet Union, at least among the ones who bothered to find out how socialism worked in the transition period towards communism – still a long way away though. So you could do a little of basic research yourself and become more effective in your anti-communist crusade.

    Nevertheless, here is a little primer, from the horse’s mouth so to speak (a Jewish site):

    https://www.jta.org/1964/04/29/archive/percentage-of-jewish-students-in-soviet-union-smaller-than-under-czar

    Yes, the dreadful Stalin was working on improving the system and some of his policies (e.g. cleaning up the ossified old guard from the leadership of the party) were not very agreeable to many apparatchiks. Maybe that was the cause for his sudden death, coincidentally when there was at the time an investigation over the suspicious death of some prominent leaders, the “White Gowns” case. That investigation was stopped by the new leader, Khrushchev who, incidentally, was a rabid enemy of Stalin whom he blamed for the death of his son in WWII.

    • Replies: @Robjil
  206. Anonymous[324] • Disclaimer says:
    @Hibernian

    All people are tribal and everyone presents a different face to the world at large then the one they present to members of their own tribe.

    Yes, it’s all one big pile of sameness. All people and all tribes are the same. A gangster just wants to make a living – just like his victim – so why should we care and nitpick the differences. Right?

  207. Anon[173] • Disclaimer says:
    @Beefcake the Mighty

    Jews do not want peace. Jews want to fulfill the Messianic promises of their religion. Promises that include a world without non-Jews (see the Zohar).

  208. Susan says:
    @Germanicus

    These were some of Douglas Reed’s thoughts in The Controversy of Zion, Chapter 24, The Coming of Zionism: “In the second half of the last century when Communism and Zionism began their simultaneous assault on the West, Europe was a place of strong and confident states well able to withstand the effects of inner troubles and foreign wars. …”

    “Thus, while Europe outwardly appeared to be slowly moving towards an improving future on the path which for eighteen centuries had served it well, in the Talmudic areas of Russia Zionism joined Communism as the second of the two forces which were to intercept that process. Communism was designed to subvert the masses; it was the “great popular movement” foreseen by Disraeli, by means of which “the secret societies” were to work in unison for the disruption of Europe. Zionism set out to subvert rulers at the top. Neither force could have moved forward without the other, for rulers of unimpaired authority would have checked the revolution as it had been checked in 1848.”

    “Zionism was essentially the rejoinder of the Talmudic centre in Russia to the emancipation of Jews in the West. It was the intimation that they must not involve themselves in mankind but must remain apart.”

    Reed said that both groups were revolutionary. “The dissension was solely on the point of Zionism. The “Communist-revolutionary” group held that full “emancipation” would be achieved when the world-revolution supplanted the nation-states everywhere. The “Zionist-revolutionary group, while agreeing that the world-revolution was indispensable to the process, held that full “emancipation” would only be achieved when a Jewish nation was established in a Jewish state.”

    At the end of the chapter, The Web of Intrigue, Reed wrote: “In November 1917 the American Republic thus became equally involved with Great Britain in Zionism, which has proved to be a destructive force. However, it was only one agency of “the destructive principle”. The reader will recall that in Dr. Weizmann’s Russian youth the mass of Jews there, under their Talmudic directors, were united in the revolutionary aim, and only divided between revolutionary-Zionism and revolutionary-Communism.”

    “In the very week of the Balfour Declaration the other group of of Jews in Russia achieved their aim, the destruction of the Russian nation-state. The Western politicians thus bred a bicephalous monster, one head being the power of Zionism in the Western capitals, and the other the power of Communism advancing from captive Russia. Submission to Zionism weakened the power of the West to preserve itself again the world-revolution, for Zionism worked to keep Western governments submissive and to deflect their policies from national interests; indeed, at that instant the cry was first raised that opposition to the world-revolution, too, was “anti-semitism”. Governments hampered by secret capitulations in any one direction cannot act firmly in any other…”

    “The simultaneous triumphs of Bolshevism in Moscow and Zionism in London in the same week of 1917 were only in appearance distinct events.” (From beginning of chapter, “The World Revolution Again.”)

  209. Anonymous[324] • Disclaimer says:
    @J. Gutierrez

    Most of what you’re peddling in this comment is fiction. Where are the links to support those tall claims?

    • Replies: @J. Gutierrez
  210. Anon[193] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anon

    Jesus is not God “ There is but one God and that is the God of Israel” Mary was a papist pagan idol. Enjoy your ignorance.

    Unless you are a Jew then none of these are your gods. Which becomes especially apparent when we examine the deeper Jewish concept of god.

    Though, you seem to have gone one step further in your effort to mimic Judaic theological belief in its entirety. There is nothing weaker of spirit or mind. You are even quoting an Arian / Mormon form of theology in order to get to your neo-Judaism. I doubt that you even know that. Pretty pathetic.

    Mary is a version of the Queen of Heaven, prior worshipped as Inanna / Venus / the Sunrise / the East by the Semites and as so many other equivalent goddesses by so many other peoples. The Jewish equivalent version is their Shekinah, in their pained process to stick to their supremacist and genocidal monotheism. Maybe you should know something about so called paganism, or maybe even Judaism, before you set out to lecture others. Judaism is intimately connected to and derived from Semitic “paganism” mixed with Aryan Zoroastrianism. Christianity itself is a Jewish subcult pulled directly from the Semitic Dumuzid / Dionysus / Bacchus / Adonis (Adonai) cult that the Jews brought to Anatolia and spent hundreds of years prior trying to spread throughout the region.

    Its ironic that someone that is so hypnotized by a people and their desert cult of death (the harvest), who want you completely genocided as stated throughout their texts, has the gall to accuse anyone of ignorance.

    Christian eschatology matches Jewish eschatology precisely. The entire thing is by and for Semites. Full stop. Christianity is a Jewish cult through and through, designed only to bring their promises to themselves into being. Which includes your group’s mass genocide at their hands that you foolishly pray for as the “rapture”.

    • Replies: @Seraphim
    , @Al Liguori
  211. @Jake

    Still, Lincoln supported the idea of sending the blacks to Panama. Jeff Davis wanted to keep them in Mississippi. That’s radical.

    Karl Marx writing in London supported Lincoln and the Union as being on the side of eventual socialist revolution.

    Just one more thing the old syphilitic was wrong about. Socialists have always hated the Republicans more than they did any other party.

  212. Anon[288] • Disclaimer says:
    @animalogic

    Gee, anon, what a wonderful rant ! Full marks for passion.
    Although you could have probably saved a lot of time by just objecting that: Jew’s ARE synonymous with communism.
    Your political sophistication is clearly revealed in views such as:
    “Any assertion to the contrary is born of Neocon (Jewish communist) influence and propaganda”
    Sneaky. Some neo-cons
    were former communists & some were/are Jew’s –therefore neoconservatism as a whole is both Jewish & communist. Easy-peasy. Your implied view that the cult of Dionysis was a jewish conpiracy is also “clever”.
    “Its axiomatic that anyone that successfully identifies with and is accepted as a member (through maternal lineage) by the Jewish ethnic group is Jewish. This is how the Rabbis see it.”
    (glad to see you on board with the rabbis)
    So, your fundamental premise that all jews are “Jews” is difficult to debate.
    “jew” in this view is a totalising concept, completely one dimensional & admitting of no subtlety or nuance. Trotsky & Rothchild are exactly the same.
    A Jew who is secular & totally unconscious of any Jewish culture & society is the same as an active Jewish conspirator seeking to undermine a gentile nation for personal & Jewish profit — why ? Because: “In the Jewish ethnic group, it is irrelevant if Jews are “secular”.” “Irrelevant” ? The (mendacious) concept of “the self hating” jew is no doubt an expression of such irrelevency.

    Between the lack of decipherable syntax and formatting, the unfinished thoughts, the fully established facts that you are attempting to recast as debatable, and the probable sarcasm it took me to this point to block off the amount of your text that is variously irrelevant and unreadable. If you want anything in the above text block taken seriously and responded to, try to calm down and rewrite it for clarity.

    For any comments that you have restated of mine, please see the post that you are responding to for my original commentary on them. I see nothing substantial in your reply worth responding to on those matters, as your replies seems to be mostly either attempted points that I already addressed in my prior post.ie:

    A Jew who is secular & totally unconscious of any Jewish culture & society is the same as an active Jewish conspirator seeking to undermine a gentile nation for personal & Jewish profit — why ? Because: “In the Jewish ethnic group, it is irrelevant if Jews are “secular”.” “Irrelevant” ? The (mendacious) concept of “the self hating” jew is no doubt an expression of such irrelevency

    or pearl clutching. ie:

    “jew” in this view is a totalising concept, completely one dimensional & admitting of no subtlety or nuance. Trotsky & Rothchild are exactly the same.

    In both cases, my prior statements still stand as my response. Your repition of prior addressed points here does not obligate me to forever repeat myself, in order to serve your desire to provide some illusion that there is a debate occurring. You have not provided substantial responses that were not already addressed, and so there is no further debate. You are merely repeating.

    You are not a bullshit artist per se. What you are is a rabid frothing at the mouth antisemite.

    And the Jewish religion is a rabid, frothing at the mouth, fully genocidal, anti-gentile ideology.

    See my prior comments about the Jewish tactic of casting defensive responses to their aggression as wrong. That is what you are doing here.

    I’ve read your deeper texts directly. I’ve read the Rabbinical commentaries. I know how to interpret the simplistic codes in your texts, when they are used at all (and they often are not: the genocidal intent is often stated outright). I know what the texts say.

    Judaism’s adherents should be ashamed to be included under Judaism’s banner, and should abandon the religon and identity en masse if they have an ounce of humanity in them. For you to defend Judaism, or condemn defense against it, either shows an arrogant psychopathy or an impressive ignorance.

    You calling me an antisemite is merely stating that I am, as one of my people, resisting my own destruction at the active hands of Jews. Its a badge of honor. Resisting Judaism is the duty of the world if it wishes to survive, and antisemitism is loyalty to humanity. Jews have never had a valid defense beside a cries of victimhood and cries for oppression on their behalf. They wouldn’t dare share the content of their religion with the world, and for good reason. The world would rise up and slaughter them en masse if they knew.

    You are poison to any attempt at the objective study of the relationship between Jew’s & gentiles.

    I do no such thing. There is no studying of this relationship beyond what has already been undertaken for thousands of years at this point. The discussion is over. There are only people like you trying to buy more time, and there is only the Jewish Messianic agenda that marches forward as you do so. No thank you. There is no upside for us. There is only cost for us, and only benefit for the Semites in stalling the conversation under the illusion of an ever circular pseudo-debate as they march forward.

    On a more positive note: you are the best kind of friend Israel & it’s Jewish supporters can get — let loose with your kind of shit & the whole hard fought effort to expose real Jewish crimes is delegitimised out of hand. Thanks, a lot.

    If you say so.

  213. @republic

    How does it stay edited? And, perhaps more to the point, can’t its editing history be examined easily by those interested? Can you in fact tell us of relevant edits in the current context?

  214. @onebornfree

    Interesting concept “choosing to believe”. I recall reading a book of essays by or including ones from, from memory, George Akerloff, where it struck forcefully that steeplejacks were likely to give great underestimates of the danger of their work. I suppose the jargon says they avoided cognitive dissonance – by choice. I think we would agree that we would like people to apply the best of their critical intellects to matters of doubt plausibly raised about matters where assumptions and maybe self interest have reigned.

  215. Tyrion 2 says:
    @Al Liguori

    You mean that Jews hold those acting responsible for their actions… shocking…and that they then try to understand…awful!

    • Replies: @anonymous
    , @Al Liguori
  216. Anon[222] • Disclaimer says:
    @Ron Unz

    You might need to take a look. They were quite prominent in Spain up until Franco, in Italy, in the fall of the house of Habsburg and the usual laying down of the masonic gauntlet was done by the British ambassador to Tsar Nicholas. The textual words are here in a comment by — I think— Seraphim. ( no, freemasonry was not mentioned, it was a long quote). But those same either/or words were said to Charles of Austria and Alphonse XIII. One simply cannot understand politics if one does not understand networks.

  217. Seraphim says:
    @Wally

    Proof of removal of the Jews or removal of Stalin?

  218. @Ron Unz

    I’ll admit I don’t really know anything about the Masons.

    I would urge you to try to get your hands on the trial transcripts in the murder of Archduke Ferdinand, which started WWI.
    The perpetrators confessed, they executed a masonic plan, the “Black Hand” being the front organisation.

    • Replies: @Al Liguori
    , @Anonymous
  219. Benjy says:
    @Al Liguori

    “a key deceit is that Marx was an atheist, so wasn’t really a “Jew”

    From Sign of the Scorpion:

    “Another of Marx’s guides, Levi Baruch, emphasised to him that the revolutionary elite of Jews were not to reject Judaism and that they should be called traitors to their own people if they did so. As sham Christians, some Jews had reached the highest positions in the Church and civil town administration in Spain in the 16th century (the Inquisitor Lucero and many others). Baruch propagated the same tactics for “revolutionary Jews” – they were to hide their Judaism behind Marxist phrases.

    When one of Baruch’s letters to Marx was published, its contents caused a big scandal, which they wanted to silence at once. This letter explained, among other things, that it would be easy for Jewry to get into power with the help of the proletariat. Thus the new governments were to be led by Jews who would forbid all private property so that all these riches came into Jewish hands, or made the Jews administrators of the fortunes and estates. In this way an old dream which the Talmud speaks of, namely that all the riches of the world would come into the hands of the Jews, was to be fulfilled. In his letter, Baruch also made it clear that the goals of Judaism were power over the whole world, a mingling of the races, abolition of national frontiers, elimination of the royal families and finally the founding of the Zionist world state.”

    • Agree: DESERT FOX
    • Replies: @Al Liguori
  220. Benjy says:
    @Wally

    I guess I didn’t express it clearly enough. I was trying to say that Ron Unz considers me to be a “wild cowboy commentor” because, in his words, I exaggerate and use “non-credible” sources.

    Cowboy, slang: A reckless person, such as a driver, pilot, or manager, who ignores potential risks.

  221. Seraphim says:
    @Anon

    Echoes of History is back! Thank you, we need a good laugh from time to time.

  222. benjy says:
    @Hibernian

    “All people are tribal and everyone presents a different face to the world at large then the one they present to members of their own tribe.”

    Andrew Joyce says that jews:

    “avoid the facts, downplay them if concession is absolutely necessary, and move the discussion into abstractions and sophistry.”

    A different “face” is not equivalent to telling lies and withholding truths. People used to be able to understand this stuff, its not rocket science. In the 1800’s if you accused an honorable gentleman of being a liar you had to be ready for a duel. If you told him that his family “presented a different face” for guests, he likely would guffaw and ignore you.

  223. @Susan

    Guess why Germany national socialists are stil demonized?

    Let me quote a Goebbels speech in the Sport Palast.
    The anglo-saxon propaganda usually focus on the now famous” total war” lines, but this speech was so much more. It was the truth, that taboo that must not be said since 1945.

    The goal of Bolshevism is Jewish world revolution. They want to bring chaos to the Reich and Europe, using the resulting hopelessness and desperation to establish their international, Bolshevist-concealed capitalist tyranny.

    and

    I am firmly convinced that the lamenting lords and archbishops in London have not the slightest intention of resisting the Bolshevist danger that would result were the Soviet army to enter Europe. Jewry has so deeply infected the Anglo-Saxon states both spiritually and politically that they are no longer have the ability to see the danger. It conceals itself as Bolshevism in the Soviet Union, and plutocratic-capitalism in the Anglo-Saxon states. The Jewish race is an expert at mimicry. They put their host peoples to sleep, paralyzing their defensive abilities. (Shouts from the crowd: “We have experienced it!”). Our insight into the matter led us to the early realization that cooperation between international plutocracy and international Bolshevism was not a contradiction, but rather a sign of deep commonalities. The hand of the pseudo-civilized Jewry of Western Europe shakes the hand of the Jewry of the Eastern ghettos over Germany. Europe is in deadly danger.

    https://research.calvin.edu/german-propaganda-archive/goeb36.htm

    It was also Goebbels, belonging to the rather left wing faction, who had maintained, that propaganda must be truthful.
    We wrote an essay on the british propaganda technique of the “big lie” called “Churchill’s lie factory”
    https://research.calvin.edu/german-propaganda-archive/goeb29.htm

    And the there was the declaration of war to US speech, which also contain timeless nuggets of truth.

    I will overlook as meaningless the insulting attacks and rude statements by this so-called President against me personally. That he calls me a gangster is particularly meaningless, since this term did not originate in Europe, where such characters are uncommon, but in America. And aside from that, I simply cannot feel insulted by Mr. Roosevelt because I regard him, like his predecessor Woodrow Wilson, as mentally unsound [geisteskrank].

    We know that this man, with his Jewish supporters, has operated against Japan in the same way. I don’t need to go into that here. The same methods were used in that case as well. This man first incites to war, and then he lies about its causes and makes baseless allegations. He repugnantly wraps himself in a cloak of Christian hypocrisy, while at the same time slowly but very steadily leading humanity into war. And finally, as an old Freemason, he calls upon God to witness that his actions are honorable. His shameless misrepresentations of truth and violations of law are unparalleled in history.

    http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v08/v08p389_Hitler.html

  224. Mulegino1 says:
    @Anon

    1. Of the divinity of Christ, which has elsewhere been established by clear and solid proofs, I presume it were superfluous again to treat.

    John Calvin, “Institutes of the Christian Religion” Chapter 13

  225. @Sean

    Clearly Browning’s review is pretty pathetic – but why all the invective? – Ordinary Men is a remarkable work of historical description, mainly – very few “theses” – but his most interesting “analysis” regards why (just a very few) individual, “ordinary men” took the opportunity to decline to participate in the mass shootings – with the only cost to them usually, being sent back to Germany under a cloud – i.e. a dishonorable discharge. His speculation is that those who had established non-military careers and stronger family ties were more likely to opt out. “I am a business man from Hamburg and I will not…” one of them memorably says to his commanding officer.

    Browning’s work seems very narrowly focused on 30s, 40s Germany and the holocaust … wonder why he took a shot at this very different field of study?

    • Replies: @Sean
  226. @atlantis_dweller

    “Jewish”? Have you ever tried to be with a woman beyond physically, Joyce?

    Are you saying that all “Jews” are women, or that all women are Jews, or what? 😉

    • Replies: @Franklin Ryckaert
    , @Anon
  227. @Germanicus

    Thanks for that.

    Tell the truth and get tacked to a couple of pieces of wood, hung out to dry, and mocked forever.

    But never mind, big government will deliver us!

    • Replies: @Germanicus
  228. Robjil says:
    @Anon

    What is the God of Israel? God is everywhere. Why would would God be focused on one tiny piece of land. This piece of land is populated by people doing monstrous cruel things to its neighbors, the US and the world. I think any real good God would not want anything do with this piece of land because of what its inhabitants are doing these days.

  229. @Seraphim

    Speaking of the federal reserve system and who funded the Bolshies…

    …it took me many years of research to find out that Communism had been totally backed and financed and promoted by the federal reserve system!

    -Eustace Mullins, radio interview by Tom Valentine, 2003
    Transcript available here

  230. @Anon

    He also noted that most of the big capitalists who caused all the problems of society were non Jews.

    If he did, (source, please), it was only to subdue them and to replace them with “Jewish” big capitalists and it was not only very clever of, but worked quite well for ,his paymasters and it’s still paying massive dividends.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  231. @Hibernian

    Many people stand in judgement of Nazism without having read one word of Mein Kampf.

    And have heard nothing but old Commie war propaganda since before they were born. Most have read nothing at all, and probably wouldn’t be able to understand it even if they could silently move their lips in the attempt.

  232. @FB

    …in today’s fascist Amerikkka the magic combination is to equate Judaism with communism…the perfect combination of the two big bugbears…LOL

    Well, if it weren’t for bugbears why would we need big government and besides, that sure beats the very tired old bugbears of the Nazi holocaust, and Muslim jihadists, to name just a couple, doesn’t it?

  233. Benjy says:
    @Anon

    I had to look it up. They were only first “discovered” in 2015.

    https://new.euro-med.dk/20160216-dialectic-rothschild-ruled-superlodges-ruling-the-world-dictating-merkels-immigration-non-policy.php

    The source of their info has been memory holed. There is lots of information on it out there. To me this resembles the masonic lodges in Germany and France in the late 18th century.

  234. Robjil says:
    @Parfois1

    Stalin death is celebrated as a Purim “miracle” on Jewish websites. Stalin must have been doing something that Jewish Elites in the Soviet Union disliked.

    https://www.aish.com/h/pur/t/ts/Stalin-and-the-Purim-Miracle.html

    ” Jewish holidays are not merely a commemoration of an event in time. The time of year in which the amiracle occurred was an opportune time for the conception of that miracle. As we make our way toward the Purim holiday, we are entering a time zone in which the all the Haman’s of the world can fail and Jewish redemption is born. The death and downfall of Stalin is an example of a miraculous, yet untold, modern day Purim story. ”

    Stalin suddenly collapsed after a dinner party to “coincide” exactly with Purim.

    https://www.aish.com/h/pur/t/ts/48955726.html

    “Stalin, according to his successor Nikita Khrushchev, who was present at the dinner party, had apparently collapsed after the feast, at which, Khrushchev also recounted, the dictator had gotten thoroughly drunk. The feast ended in the early hours of March 1.
    Which, in 1953, corresponded to the 14th day of Adar, otherwise known as Purim.”

    https://www.aish.com/h/pur/t/ts/Stalin-and-the-Purim-Miracle.html

    “That Purim night ( 1953), a few days before the Jewish doctors were due to go to trial, and just thirty minutes after Rabbi Silver’s foretelling of Stalin’s vulnerable fate, Stalin was said to have “collapsed in a fit of rage” during a meeting in which his supporters expressed opposition to his evil plan, according to the Jewish Telegraphic Agency. That Purim, thousands of Jewish prisoners were freed. Joseph Stalin died on March 5, just a few days later, to the great relief of Russian Jewry. “To this day, I am choked with emotion every time I think back to that Purim of miracles,” recounts Mrs. Batyah Barg.”

    The first day of the Purim month, Adar, this year is March 6 at sundown. Purim is three days – Purim Erev/ Ta’aint Esther, Purim eve/ Fast of Esther, which starts this year on March 19 at sundown. Purim itself which starts this year on March 20 at sundown. Purim Shushan, walled city Purim, which is celebrated in walled cities with Jerusalem being the main one. It this year starts on March 21 at sundown. What “will” happen this year in the world to “celebrate” Purim and the Purim month of Adar?

    • Replies: @Che Guava
  235. @Der ex-Deutsche

    Shocked you understand the lies of the holocaust but know nothing of this starvation campaign, even to the point of questioning it.

    That really perplexes me as well.

    Thanks for your very informative comment and please keep ’em coming.

  236. @Susan

    Reed was a gem and it’s great to see him quoted here. Thanks.

  237. Al Liguori says: • Website
    @Benjy

    Definitely a keeper for my website. Do you have page number? Thank you.

  238. anonymous[237] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anon

    ‘Lots of Jews owned farm land and hired the local Russians to work it’

    Trotskys father actually did this.

  239. anonymous[237] • Disclaimer says:
    @Hibernian

    Are all peoples equally as tribal?

  240. anonymous[237] • Disclaimer says:
    @Tyrion 2

    ‘You mean that Jews hold those acting responsible for their actions’

    Apart from themselves.

    If I had been kicked out of every country I had ever settled in I would wonder If I was doing something wrong…

    • Replies: @Tyrion 2
  241. Al Liguori says: • Website
    @Anon

    Rubbish.

    Josephus’s historical “revelation” informs us that Jesus Christ was True Man. As a True Man he had/has/will always have a True Mother.

    Scriptural revelation informs us that Jesus Christ was/is/always will be True God and that His Mother was/is/always will be Immaculate. http://judaism.is/hating-mary-html

    Since “Judaism” followed Christianity, Christianity cannot be derivative of “Judaism.” Whatever glimmer of reality the pagans had does not diminish the reality.

    In his book The Controversy of Zion, Douglas Reed drills that point home most eloquently;

    [MORE]

    What manner of man was this? Another paradox in the story of Zion is that in our generation Christian divines and theologians often insist that “Jesus was a Jew”, whereas the Judaist elders refuse to allow this (those Zionist rabbis who occasionally tell political or “interfaith’” audiences that Jesus was a Jew are not true exceptions to this rule; they would not make the statement among Jews and seek to produce an effect among their non-Jewish listeners, for political reasons). *

    This public assertion, “Jesus was a Jew”, is always used in our century for political purposes. It is often en1ployed to quell objections to the Zionist influence in international politics or to the Zionist invasion of Palestine, the suggestion being that, as Jesus was a Jew, none ought to object to anything purporting to be done in the name of Jews. The irrelevance is obvious, but mobs are moved by such phrases, and the paradoxical result, once again, is that a statement, most offensive to literal Jews, is most frequently made by non-Jewish politicians and ecclesiastics who seek Jewish favour.

    The English abbreviation, “Jew” is recent and does not correspond to anything denoted by the Aramaic, Greek or Roman terms for “Judahite” or “Judean”, which were in use during the lifetime of Jesus. In fact, the English noun “Jew” cannot be defined (so that dictionaries, which are scrupulously careful about all other words, are reduced to such obvious absurdities as “A person of Hebrew race”); and the Zionist state has no legal definition of the term (which is natural, because the Torah, which is the Law, exacts pure Judahite descent, and a person of this lineage is hardly to be found in the entire world).

    If the statement, “Jesus was a Jew”, has meaning therefore, it must apply to the conditions prevailing in his time. In that case it would mean one of three things, or all of them: that Jesus was of the tribe of Judah (therefore Judahite); that he was of Judean domicile (and therefore Judean); that he was religiously “a Jew” if any religion denoted by that term existed in his time.

    Race, residence, religion, then.

    This book is not the place to argue the question of Jesus’s racial descent, and the surprising thing is that Christian divines allow themselves some of the statements which they make. The reader should form his own opinion, if he desires to have one in this question.

    The genealogy of Mary is not given in the New Testament, but three passages might imply that she was of Davidic descent; St. Matthew and St. Luke trace the descent of Joseph from David and Judah, but Joseph was not the blood father of Jesus. The Judaist authorities discredit all these references to descent, holding that they were inserted to bring the narrative into line with prophecy.

    As to residence, St. John states that Jesus was born at Bethlehem in Judea through the chance that his mother had to go there from Galilee to register; the Judaist authorities, again, hold that this was inserted to make the account agree with Micah’s prophecy that “a ruler” would come out of Bethlehem”.

    The Jewish Encylopaedia insists that Nazareth as Jesus’s native town, and indeed, general agreement exists that he was a Galilean, whatever the chance of his actual birthplace. Galilee, where nearly all his life was spent, was politically entirely separate from Judea, under its own Roman tetrarch, and stood to Judea in the relationship of “a foreign country” (Graetz). Marriage between a Judean and a Galilean was forbidden and even before Jesus’s birth all Judeans living in Galilee had been forced by Simon Tharsi, one of the Maccabean princes, to migrate to Judah.

    Thus, the Galileans were racially and politically distinct from the Judeans.

    Was this Galilean, religiously, what might today be called “a Jew”? The Judaist authorities, of course, deny that most strenuously of all; the statement, often heard from the platform and pulpit, might cause a riot in the synagogue.

    It is difficult to see what responsible public men can mean when they use the phrase. There was in the time of Jesus no “Jewish” (or even Judahite or Judaist or Judean) religion. There was Jehovahism, and there were the various sects, Pharisees, Sadducees and Essenes, which disputed violently between themselves and contended, around the temple, for power over the people. They were not only sects, but also political parties, and the most powerful of them were the Pharisees with their “oral traditions” of what God had said to Moses.

    If today the Zionists are “the Jews” (and this is the claim accepted by all great Western nations), then the party which in Judea in the time of Jesus corresponded to the Zionists was that of the Pharisees. Jesus brought the whole weight of his attack to bear on these Pharisees. He also rebuked the Sadducees and the scribes. but the Gospels show that he held the Pharisees to be the foes of God and man and that he used an especial, scarifying scorn towards them. The things which he singled out for attack, in them and in their creed, are the very things which today’s Zionists claim to be the identifying features of Jews, Jewishness and Judaism.

    Religiously, Jesus seems beyond doubt to have been the opposite and adversary of all that which would make a literal Jew today or would have made a literal Pharisee then.

    None can say with certainty who or what he was, and these suggestive statements by non-Jewish politicians ring as false as the derisive and mocking lampoons about “the bastard” which circulated in the Jewish ghettoes.

    *Rabbi Stephen Wise, the leading Zionist organizer in the United States during the 1910-1950 period, used this phrase for the obvious political motive, of confusing non-Jewish hearers. Speaking to such an “inter-faith” meeting at the Carnegie Hall at Christmastide 1925, he stated “Jesus was a Jew, not a Christian” (Christianity was born with the death of Jesus).

    For this he was excommunicated by the Orthodox Rabbis Society of the United States, but a Christian Ministers Association “hailed me as a brother”. Rabbi Wise adds the characteristic comment: “I know not which was more hurtful, the acceptance of me as a brother and welcoming me into the Christian fold, or the violent diatribe of the rabbis”.

    The Controversy of Zion
    by Douglas Reed, First Printing 1956, p. 59 ff.
    download here
    https://ia600707.us.archive.org/25/items/TheControversyOfZion/TheControversyOfZion.pdf

  242. Al Liguori says: • Website
    @Tyrion 2

    Oh, puh-leez!

    As if “Only Jews are human” and “Kill even the best of Gentiles” are not the fundamentals of their creed and the behavior it has inspired for millennia???

    Who is human? Who is not?
    What do they say?
    http://judaism.is/who-is-human.html

    Ironically the most self-obsessed tribe is also the tribe least inclined to self-reflection… Jewish belief and behavior cause “antisemitism.”

    That defect alone is enough to discredit the self-vaunted “genius” claimed by the tribe. Promulgating Jewish supremacism, instigating gentile-against-gentile wars, fomenting revolutions, suborning heresies, undermining Christian society, false flags, big lies, inflicting multiculturalism, and perpetrating vice, ritual murder, genocide, slavery and economic crimes against humanity, including usury, fractional reserve banking, swindling, and tax farming have consequences. The perpetual pose of Jews as innocent victims is a fraud. Are there innocents among the Jews? Initially, many! But those innocents, in shielding the guilty, have made themselves accomplices of the guilty, over the millennia earning the expulsion of Jews from hundreds of nations, principalities, and city-states.

    • Troll: Tyrion 2
  243. Al Liguori says: • Website
    @Ron Unz

    Freemasonry can be best understood as a subset of Noahidism.

    http://judaism.is/noahide-deceit.html

    The 7… ooops!… 620 “Noahide Laws” are not benevolent, but submission to the whims of the rabbis, a Jewish version of Islamic dhimmitude complete with beheading.

    • Replies: @Germanicus
  244. Che Guava says:
    @Commentator Mike

    An interesting article and thread. As for comments, some I agree, some not, some I am knowing to be true, some I am knowing to be lies, and some reliable, but I was not knowing before.

    I am only making a small point to you, Mike, and it is not a rule, but in posting here I am distinguishing between ‘commentator’ (the Saker, Anatoly, Linh Dinh, Andrew Joyce, C.J. Hopkins, Diana Johnstone, NoI Research Group, Fred Reed, Andrei, etc.) and ‘commentor’ (you, me, and everyone else who is commenting here but has no articles (commentary) posted). I may some time, as may you.

    That seems to be normal in English.

    So, by missing the distinction, your u-name is a little strange.

    • Replies: @Commentator Mike
  245. Al Liguori says: • Website
    @Germanicus

    The trial transcripts reveal that Gavrilo Princep was a crypto-Jew. He and his mostly Jewish co-assassins were of the Judeo-Masonic “Black Hand Lodge.” See Secret Powers Behind Revolution: Freemasonry and Judaism by Vicomte Leon de Poncins, p. 80.

    • Replies: @Franklin Ryckaert
  246. @Germanicus

    The originators of the BIG LIE—six types of lies encouraged by the Torah:

    1. scholarship (including Torah scholarship),
    2. sexuality, and
    3. hospitality
    The Talmud: The Steinsaltz Edition, Vol II, p.49
    4. lying to gentiles (Baba Kamma 113a)
    5. lying to keep out of trouble (for “peace”) (Yebamoth 65b)
    6. when everyone should know you are lying, guzmah (Hullin 90b)

    “Rabbis are liable to alter their words, and the accuracy of their statements is not to be relied upon.” The Talmud: The Steinsaltz Edition, Vol. II, pp. 48-49.

    http://judaism.is/big-lies.html

    • Replies: @Germanicus
  247. Anonymous[234] • Disclaimer says:
    @Germanicus

    This is true and well worth looking into. Back in the day I was involved in O.T.O. (Ordo Templi Orientis) which was also, upon examination, fully corrupted, jewish and satanic. The name alone is a clue.

    • Replies: @Che Guava
  248. @Beefcake the Mighty

    This is an excellent point. I grew up in a mostly Jewish neighborhood in NYC and I can tell you that in 1968 there was more enthusiasm for the Soviet Union than the US, but any gentile who says so gets “the treatment.” I once saw a TV discussion of McCarthyism and Hollywood. One of the panelists was Michael Korda (Jewish), son of filmscore composer Alexander Korda. Korda laughed at the suggestion that Hollywood was being “slandered” by the red-baiters, recounting poolside parties he had attended as a boy with his parents where the Soviet flag waved over the swimming pool. Jews seem to tolerate a fair amount of criticism from fellow Jews in journals aimed at a Jewish audience, but have decided that the minute they admit that some gentile has a just complaint against them it will be the Holocaust all over again. This attitude attests to a strong distrust of gentiles and unwillingness ever to demote their Jewish identity to secondary status, even though in matters of religion most are atheists or agnostics. Presumably they think that gentiles, if given an opportunity, will resent and persecute them irrespective of how they themselves identify. Therefore, it is best to keep the upper hand at all costs.

  249. Che Guava says:
    @Robjil

    Very interesting, and I have also raised doctors’ plot and, from there, destruction of USSR, on this site.

    The links you had placed, first time I read official Jewish interpretation of it, thank you.

    Now having read that, it is truly creepy, and is making me think, more than ever, that the doctors’ plot was real.

    • Agree: Robjil
    • Replies: @Robjil
  250. Tyrion 2 says:
    @anonymous

    Easily the most accepted and widely dispersed religious minority group on human history. Though that’s like being the luckiest kid in the oncology ward.

    Also, Google “actions”. Being “kicked” is not doing an action.

    • Replies: @anonymous
  251. Anonymous[234] • Disclaimer says:
    @jacques sheete

    This is important. Like many other parasites, at first they they simply want to attach themselves to the goyim elite but the final plan is to worm-in and eat/replace the host.

    • Replies: @Al Liguori
  252. Che Guava says:

    When overseas, I had two or three friends (probably more among those I met in their circles) who were avowed O.T.O. members.

    They were each, in different ways, dysfunctional. Two were plain creepy, but one was quite brilliant, many interesting ideas, actions, events, but then became a junky, so that was it (years ago, so I would guess and hope that he stopped being a junky).

    It would be interesting if you say more abt. O.T.O., at least in general terms, or place a link to a critical (as in anti) site.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  253. @Al Liguori

    “…The trial transcripts reveal that Gavrilo Princep was a crypto-Jew…”

    Do you have a reliable source for that ? I have seen only information that Gavrilo Princip was a real Serbian nationalist :

    “…The man who arguably single-handedly reshaped the course of the 20th century was born in the tiny town of Obljaj in Bosnia in 1894. Gavrilo Princip’s parents were poor peasants who led lives dominated by physical labor…” Source : Gavrilo Princip : The Serbian Nationalist who assassinated Franz…

    That doesn’t look very Jewish to me. In a small village people would know who is Jewish or not. Not all events in world history are Jewish conspiracies, and not all persons who play a crucial role in them have been “crypto-Jews”. Suspicions are no proof.

    • Replies: @Al Liguori
  254. @Al Liguori

    In my opinion, the Kaaba and the jewish Tefilim, the jewish obsession with black cubes, all have the same origin.
    They run a private intelligence “black cube”, they run “quantum” D-Wave black cube boxes, and the muslims circle around a giant black cube, that allegedly hosts two meteorite stones.

    • Replies: @Al Liguori
  255. @Mike P

    I’m not a fan of bootleg copies as I think writers should be compensated for their work. Don’t be a freeloader.

  256. @jacques sheete

    I think like the Jewish philosopher Otto Weininger he believes that Jews and women have the same character.

  257. @Che Guava

    Oh yes, I would have preferred using “commenter Mike” but when I tried posting my first comment I got the response that it was taken, so I next chose “commentator Mike” and as it was accepted I ran with it. I forgot to try the American spelling with the “o”. But you are quite right about the difference in meaning. I didn’t quite think it mattered in this context as it’s just a pseudonym that I can easily remember.

    According to Collins dictionary, “commentator” also stands for:

    2. a person who writes notes on a text, event, etc

    So maybe the difference is subtle. Often we’re not directly commenting on the text of the author but on other comments, or occasionally bringing up other matters not related to the text, and often the threads drift away from the topic. I try to keep my comments short, but some do write texts to rival the original that the authors put up.

    It’d be like me asking you shouldn’t it be “Che Guevara” instead of “Che Guava”.

    • Replies: @Che Guava
  258. @jacques sheete

    Hadn’t these speeches been timeless?

    A Bush comes to mind, who said god commanded him to devastate Iraq.

    When Goebbels states the jewry of east and west shake their hands obver Germany, this sadly became a reality.

    All the communist symbols they used have been all masonic symbols, including the one of the UN that resembles the one of the Soviet Union.

    Small collection:

    Handshakerising sun
    “craft” hammer, circle, garlandTorch, same as statue of liberty

    But masonry was also reflected in communist songs, however, it is concealed from the masses. You need to know the keywords and meaning.

    Example:

    “Allüberall der Hammer ertönt, die werkende Hand zu und spricht: ”

    “Everywhere the hammer sounds, to the crafty hand speaks:”

    Which means masonry speaks and hammers.

    You just have to learn to decode the mason speak, in the same manner you have to learn to decode legalese star chamber talmudic “justice”, which is based on inversion.

    “Werktätige” = the sheep who do the masons’ “great work”, the “craft”. Its all full of double meaning concealed from the public(ie lowest ranks) despite Hollywood regularly stage masonic rituals in the open.

  259. Che Guava says:
    @Anonymous

    When overseas, I had two or three friends (probably more among those I met in their circles) who were avowed O.T.O. members.

    They were each, in different ways, dysfunctional. Two were plain creepy, but one was quite brilliant, many interesting ideas, actions, events, but then became a junky, so that was it (years ago, so I would guess and hope that he stopped being a junky).

    It would be interesting if you say more abt. O.T.O., at least in general terms, or place a link to a critical (as in anti) site.

  260. Che Guava says:
    @Commentator Mike

    Well, your attempted point on my u-name is making it clear that you are a fool, seemingly with neither consciousness, nor a sense of the ridiculous, at best.

    I will sure not be the helper for your impaired brain and consciousness. You can go by, ladadidah, always a pretense.

    • Replies: @Commentator Mike
  261. Anonymous[234] • Disclaimer says:
    @Che Guava

    O.T.O. is a trap for people who are spiritually curious. It’s an indoctrination farm where the lies are carefully drip-fed in order to make them appear “valuable” and “true”. People get seduced into the programme because it offers knowledge, power and purpose but with all three they are the victims and useful idiots.

    I’ve rejected the farm soon enough so it’s not up to me to offer high-end analysis. Still, it’s an important subject because it’s beyond obvious that many of the key (((NWO))) (((Globalists))) are hanging from similar fishing lines.

    • Replies: @Che Guava
  262. @Anonymous

    If you can’t see the “Game” being played, then the proper “MKUltra” response is to see it as “Fiction”. The best chess players in the world are Russian Jews, these people plan moves so far ahead of their opponents it takes a super computer to beat them. The fiction you claim is staring right at you! The “End Game” is being setup like pieces on a chess board. China could have never become the power that it is without the guidance of the Jewish Bankers. David Rockefeller once said: ” Whatever the price of the Chinese Revolution, it has obviously succeeded not only in producing more efficient and dedicated administration, but also in fostering high morale and community of purpose. The social experiment in China under Chairman Mao’s leadership is one of the most important and successful in human history “. Soon after that quote China joined the WTO with Slick Willie’s help.

    Never in History has a country experienced such growth in such a short timespan! During that same time period the US experienced the opposite. The Savings and Loan Crisis, the Dot.com bubble, the Housing Bubble and the Bank Bailout. I’m of the opinion that those crisis provided the bankers with the initial “Seed Money” to begin transforming China from a peasant economy to a manufacturing economy. Combine that with US Corporations (Purchased by Jews with fake dollars)moving their plants to China, Jews giving them US technology and Americans buying their products created the China that David Rockefeller envisioned…Just another “Move” in their Game.

    Russia has always been there as a counter balance to US power! It kept the MIC busy manufacturing weapons to stay ahead of the Russia. The Russian state owned Manufacturing Industry was plundered by the Jewish Oligarchs after the break up of the Soviet Union making them some of the richest people on earth. Trump at that time was a failing Real Estate Developer with huge debt and Casinos. The perfect place to launder all this new found money.

    The Rothshields help Trump get out of his hole with loans and the Russians laundered their money through Trump casinos. Trump faced money laundering charges and paid fines for his involvement. The Russians then moved their money laundering to buying Trump properties way over market value and invested in building projects. They now had someone compromised that had name recognition and with Jewish money could run for Americas top corporate position! The US is a corporation, its not Fiction.

    The resurrection of the Russian/US Cold War era was another textbook Jewish move. Now the Jews had the pieces in place and we can see how the game is being played with every move. Unless you are blind and need “links” to feel your way through current events (Brail). The collusion is so obvious, just read the articles printed about Trumps legal cases. Putin allows Israel to bomb Syria at will. The US opens their new Embassy in Jerusalem and stops funding Palestine. Israel partners with China in the New Silk Road along with Russia. Why is the US not included in that project or better said, Why is the US (Trump) creating division with it’s past allies? Because the US has a free population that is very well armed and the Russian, Chinese, Israeli project does not include the people of the US. “Once we’re done sucking the juice out of America, we’ll just let it dry up and crumble”. Bibi said something to that effect. I can go on and on but I get tired of typing, besides I have better things to do than to try to get Sheep to see the wolves on a hill. Staring at them and getting ready to run down the hill and devour their kids!

    Don’t you find it Ironic that the UK (part of that team), refuses to turn over Venezuela’s gold, Russia gets Venezuela to hand them their remaining gold and the US just accepted 50 tons from ISIS stolen from Syria. Trump has a place to go and so do most politicians, Rich 9%ers and US bankers when SHTF and China calls the US debt. With no money, no silver and no gold how does the US government pay up? They don’t…you do…they will offer pennies on the dollar for your property or just take it. The US signed it over as collateral on existing loans, along with your kids and your grand kids along time ago. You’d be smart to see beyond the matrix, think on your own and stop trying to find links that prove what I’m saying is not Fiction.

    The problem is see on this site is, the intellectuals think and analyze events to the point of convincing themselves or being convinced by another intellectual that they are the ones seeing things the way they really are. Good Luck finding your way, I saw this coming along time ago and no longer reside there, but that doesn’t guarantee I will be OK. American’s don’t realize their failure to stop what is going on, will effect everyone else around the world. Nobody can go take care o your business, Trump is not ordained, Q is Mossad and you people killed the JFK’s, RFK’s and MLK’s that stood up. All that is left is the “Willy’s” like on this site, just a little too far “Right” that makes him an extreme left, blinded by Trumpism!

    They don’t hide anything any more, they tell you in your face and watch you do nothing.

  263. @Al Liguori

    They keep misquoting the following from “Churchill’s lie factory”, and even worse, they attribute it to Hitler and claim, the Germans gave away propaganda secrets.

    They were even proud of fooling Germany in so easy and clever a fashion. They revealed their methods. They are not believable any longer. We only need to refer to the World War and note that the same men are determining English news policy as did from 1914 to 1918, and everything becomes clear.

    That is of course rather painful for those involved. One should not, as a rule, reveal one’s secrets, since one does not know if and when one may need them again. The essential English leadership secret does not depend on particular intelligence. Rather, it depends on a remarkably stupid thick-headedness. The English follow the principle that when one lies, one should lie big, and stick to it. They keep up their lies, even at the risk of looking ridiculous.

    Context matters, Goebbels was talking about british propaganda.

    That applies to the dramatic events now taking place at sea and in the air. Despite his own knowledge and the facts, Mr. Churchill keeps saying that England is in a good position, and he is not in any way influenced by contrary facts. The Royal Air Force has pulverized Hamburg, destroyed every railroad station in Berlin, and left German war production in ruins, all the while never hitting a clinic, hospital, orphanage, old people’s home, or any kind of civilian target at all. The German Luftwaffe, on the other hand, has never been particularly interested in military or industrial targets. It is instead magnetically drawn to churches, schools, institutions for homeless children, and workers’ homes. They particularly like embassies, consulates, or American businesses. They fly randomly over English cities until they have found such a target, then dive down and drop their bombs. They want to drive the USA into the war. If perchance the German Luftwaffe manages to bomb an industrial city like Cardiff, Reuters reports: “Unknown airplanes attacked something or another somehow, somewhere. The damage is still unclear, but no military or industrial targets were hit. Further details will follow.” The world public can wait for the details until the war is over.

    Nothing has changed much? Syria, Iraq? Iran? Venzuela? Russia? “Us good, they bad”?

    • Replies: @Al Liguori
  264. @Che Guava

    My, my, we are sensitive!

    I couldn’t care less whether you chose your name as a spoof on Guevara or because you like guava, pink or green. Don’t you have somewhere better to go to hurl insults and fire your ad hominem attacks?

    Any excuse to derail a thread, eh?

    • Replies: @Che Guava
  265. Benjy says:
    @Ron Unz

    “I’ll admit I don’t really know anything about the Masons.”

    Religiously, I am agnostic. I don’t believe in any Religion, but I don’t disbelieve either. When one “believes” in one religion, to be truly honest, one has to “disbelieve” in all others. I do not suffer from this. By education I have Bachelors in Math from University of California and I have had a career in computers.

    I don’t have to believe in Satan to believe that there are people who do. Likewise with all kinds of ancient gods, even aliens. Freemasonry applies as well.

    Decades spent working on IT problems have shaped my thinking patterns to a large degree. So when I look at history, and I try to explain to myself why something happened, I go to my old habits and gather what information I have available at my fingertips. Most of that comes from memory, and much of that memory is from podcasts. Thousands of them over the last decade.

    When I look at the October revolution, I gather any information available. Rasputin, star alignment (The soviet empire was founded 8th November, 1917 at 4 min past 2pm in Petrograd. In astrological terms the sun was precisely at the center of sign of Scorpio. Thus Scorpio can be regarded as the guardian of soviet power. The Bolshevik leaders were well versed in astrology) , even occultic lust for Constantinople. But I know that one common thread connecting all the key players across all the continent is freemasonry and illumitism.

    Mathematically, not considering the effects of freemasonry in the entire picture, reminds me of the issue of omitted variables. Now if the methods, goals and nature of freemasonry could be correlated to some other variable, perhaps greed or jewishness, then the omission will not have so severe an impact.

    But here the omitted variable is centuries of illumitism and Rothschild manipulation of the entire planet. Their purposes of Revenge, Genocide, Eretz Israel, the mixing of all the races on the planet are accounted for in no other variables in your equations of historical reality. It renders your model useless at explaining the past or in determining the future. Your model could be based on every single “credible” article ever written, but if you ignore these variables it leaves my model, based on Cowboy comments and non-credible sources, far more accurate.

    It is just like all the climate models confirming global warming that omit solar radiation as a key variable.

    • Replies: @Anon
    , @Seraphim
  266. @Beefcake the Mighty

    I agree with you brother, but I think they have moved towards a more cooperative agenda. It seems like they are using the US/Russia rivalry as a smoke screen while behind the scenes they are discussing how to split up loot from unsuspecting countries. Venezuela is a perfect scenario, the US pressures for regime change, installs sanctions and threatens to invade. Maduro gets nervous after the failed drone strike and seeks help. Russia comes to the rescue and offers military support in exchange or oil as payment. China moves in and offers loans and also uses oil as a method of payment. The more the US threatens the more Russia/China get from Maduro, good cop bad cop.

    In Syria, the US continues because it’s clear Russia is playing Israel’s game, there is no threat from anyone, they are all partners in crime. The US finally gets what they have been looking for, 50 tons of stolen Syrian gold. The gold has been the carrot that keeps the US in Syria. ISIS has been hiding it, while the US has been trying to find it. Now with their last stronghold being attacked and the war coming to an end, ISIS has only one option, that is to give the US what it has been waiting for…the gold. Russia and China say nothing because Russia got Venezuelan gold handed to them and Israel will most likely have the gold sent to them for safe keeping. Everybody wins, except the Syrians, Venezuelans and Americans people because they financed all the looting and will receive zero.

    Like I said before…the time is coming when these people, have to bring the American government down. With the help of the brainwashed Zionists/Christian right wing Trumpets, they will begin under the guise of Civil War and Marshall Law. Americans will be left holding the bag, blamed for everything bad, hated by everyone! It’s going to get very ugly for everyone around the world when the Zionist rule from Jerusalem, Noahide law makes Sharia Law look good. The only good thing that will come out of all that bullshit, is when the Trumpets hand over their weapons willingly, drive themselves to the FEMA camps because Q tells them they will be able to watch the evil Democrats executed after the secret military tribunals. Trump was right, the RIGHT is stupid, If they weren’t, they would know they pose a bigger threat to the Zionist they support.

  267. @Counterinsurgency

    A ruling class IQ of between 90 and 95 can thus communicate about 80% of the population (1 significant figure) but has very limited ability to communicate with IQ over 100 or 105

    Typo. Should be:

    A ruling class IQ of between 90 and 95 can thus communicate about 80% of the population (1 significant figure) but has very limited ability to communicate with IQ over 110 or 115

  268. @Germanicus

    Thanks for sharing a sample of Mr. Goebbels’ writings with us. I have always felt a certain connection to the German people and the terrible wars they were forced to endure. For some reason I felt the same about the Irish. This connection led me to try and find out more about these people. While reading about the Mexican Revolution I came across an article that talked about a group of Irish, German and Polish soldiers joined the Mexican Army. The story was very interesting and brought to light the reason why I felt the way I did. These people fought and died fighting what they saw was Protestant aggression towards a Catholic nation, and they were all Christian Catholics. If you want to read more about this group, Google the San Patricios Mexican Artillery Batallion.

    The common thread that I can point to is that we have experienced aggression and war by the Zionist Anglo Saxon race. Mexico in the US land grab, the Irish before that and the Germans in WWI and WWII. They race that made a pact with the Jewish Bankers around the 1800’s. And still kneel to their Kings and Queens.,.they wear that thing on top of their head when they visit Israel. The hair on my arms stand up when I see the US Presidents do that. Goebbels will now come to mind next time I see that. Have you read anything about the Great Tartaria?

    • Replies: @Germanicus
    , @Anon
  269. Sean says:
    @RegretLeft

    Before a mass deportation of males and massacre of several hundred dependents (all Jews), a Major Wilhelm Trapp explained the 101 Reserve Police Battalion had been given these orders, but permitted anyone who felt unable to participate in killing old people, women and children to avoid the duty at absolutely no cost to themselves. Out of 120 only five asked to be excused, and nothing happened to them.

  270. @Anon

    Can you please give the best quotable sources for those Stalin conclusions and orders.

  271. Anon[436] • Disclaimer says:
    @Benjy

    There you go again – well on the spectrum – “centuries [sic] of Rothschild manipulation of the entire planet”! Still a Bachelors degree in mathematics might just have got you to the threshold of greater things where fantasies of developing ideas of space-time might effectively abolish the need to worry about conventional historical chronology again. Loony Toons!

  272. @J. Gutierrez

    I probably wouldn’t make it an issue of christian flavor.
    What usually makes immediate common ground with the Irish is similar experience with the British. I met lovely Irish people.
    The relationship between Protestants and Catholics in Germany has been difficult and caused the 30 years war that depopulated entire german landscapes. Its nowadays no longer a problem luckily. Germany is in that regard split equally in Protestant and Catholic areas. Protestants used to be a 60% majority before WWII, they voted in majority for Hitler, while Catholics against him. The 13 Million ethnically cleansed were predominately protestant, and the land was given to arch catholic Poles.
    I am aware that Catholics in US are almost a bastion of sanity in the US compared to the many evangelical nutcases. But, the picture in Germany is the opposite, the German catholic church is terribly corrupt, and politically active on the side of the jews. The remains of Lutheran church that served as opposition network in communist times, has been totally infiltrated and corrupted after 1990.

    E Michael Jones has some very good information in english on the disgusting state of the (catholic) church in Germany, and how it is used to advance an evil agenda. I am saying that as a Lutheran Protestant.

    I am no fan of Fomenko, I do not buy into a 1000 year gap and thus invention. There are too many details that are not faked, eg letters by writers to loved ones, bills, order lists whatever, basically paper trails.
    What I am willing to consider is the Phantom time theory of Heribert Illig, because something stinks in chronology of the collapse of the Roman empire and early medieval time. My problem with chronology starts long before the Romans, Greeks, in fact very long before, in thousands of years missing.

    According to this scenario, the entire Carolingian period, including the figure of Charlemagne, is a fabrication, with a “phantom time” of 297 years (AD 614–911) added to the Early Middle Ages.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phantom_time_hypothesis

    • Replies: @Benjy
  273. Anon[436] • Disclaimer says:
    @J. Gutierrez

    No, it didn’t “bring to light” the “way you feel”….It fed your existing uneducated prejudices. Try getting a decent education instead of just reading a few articles that somehow come to your attention. Incidentally, the Pope awarded Ireland to the Catholic Norman rulers of England long before Protestantism arose

    • Replies: @anonymous
    , @J. Gutierrez
  274. @Bill Jones

    The Bank of England was formed in 1694. Did it have the same effect on who owned what that you allege the creation of the Fed in 1913 had?

    • Replies: @Bill Jones
  275. Mulegino1 says:

    Before a mass deportation of males and massacre of several hundred dependents (all Jews), a Major Wilhelm Trapp explained the 101 Reserve Police Battalion had been given these orders, but permitted anyone who felt unable to participate in killing old people, women and children to avoid the duty at absolutely no cost to themselves. Out of 120 only five asked to be excused, and nothing happened to them.

    Translation: Major Trapp was captured by the “Allies” and handed over to the Communist Polish government (mostly composed of vengeful Jews like war criminal Solomon Morel) tortured and confessed to another fictitious “Nazi” atrocity, a la Katyn. The Jews are excellent at conflating anti-partisan and evacuation actions with mass murder.

    Goldhagen is not a credible source for anything.

    • Agree: Al Liguori
    • Replies: @Mulegino1
  276. Robjil says:
    @Che Guava

    Jewish websites also state that the first Russian Revolution in February (Old Russian Time) 1917 started on Purim. Also on many Jewish websites there is talk about many big world events having connections to Purim or other Jewish themes.

    https://www.chabad.org/holidays/purim/article_cdo/aid/3605206/jewish/Purim-in-Petrograd-1917.htm

    “That year, International Women’s Day serendipitously coincided with the festival of Purim, which marks the salvation of the Jewish people, in part through the audacious bravery of Queen Esther. Tens of thousands of men and women joined the workers of the Putilov factory who had already been striking for several days. Marching in the streets of Petrograd they demanded an end to the continuous food shortages, an end to the war, and an end to the Tsarist autocracy. Michoel Dworkin, a graduate of the Tomchei Temimim yeshiva, was in the city at the time and recalled that the Rebbe delivered a discourse marking the festival. It began with the passage from the megillah in which Haman, the arch-foe of the Jews is advised to “build a gallows fifty cubits high” (Esther, 5:14). Though originally intended for Mordechai, the righteous Jew, Haman himself was ultimately hung upon it instead. Unfortunately, no transcript of the discourse is extant.25

    By the end of the week most of the armed forces in the city had mutinied and joined the revolution, the Petrograd Soviet of Workers’ and Soldiers’ Deputies had been convened, and the Provisional Committee of the State Duma declared itself the governing body of Russia.26 “

  277. Mulegino1 says:
    @Mulegino1

    The hypocrisy and duplicity of the Nuremberg IMT and the later tribunals was monumental, and had a lot to do with the penetration of the FDR administration and British intelligence with communist spies of the kosher persuasion- especially in the areas of psychological warfare and linguistics.

    German soldiers were actually named in the indictments for having committed the Katyn Massacre, which everyone knew at the time was committed by the Soviet NKVD. That these indictments were allowed is proof positive that the whole affair was just one big show trial and vae victis tragic farce.

    One cannot help becoming cynical given the mountain of lies and fraud that characterize the “good wars” narrative.

    • Replies: @Robjil
  278. I am no fan of Fomenko, I do not buy into a 1000 year gap and thus invention.

    Some Fomenko-like thinking is in the mainstream. This graph could have come out of one of Fomenko’s books:
    (Reddit)
    The hole left by the Christian Dark Ages graph. Not so common any more, but it was and always will be bad

  279. Seraphim says:
    @Germanicus

    And we know that the famous propaganda technique called the ‘Big Lie’, so often quoted as Goebbels invention had a completely different meaning in Goebbels’ words:

    “The essential English leadership secret does not depend on particular intelligence. Rather, it depends on a remarkably stupid thick-headedness. The English follow the principle that when one lies, one should lie big, and stick to it. They keep up their lies, even at the risk of looking ridiculous”.

    As it had in Hitler’s words:

    “But it remained for the Jews, with their unqualified capacity for falsehood, and their fighting comrades, the Marxists, to impute responsibility for the downfall precisely to the man who alone had shown a superhuman will and energy in his effort to prevent the catastrophe which he had foreseen and to save the nation from that hour of complete overthrow and shame. By placing responsibility for the loss of the world war on the shoulders of Ludendorff they took away the weapon of moral right from the only adversary dangerous enough to be likely to succeed in bringing the betrayers of the Fatherland to Justice.
    All this was inspired by the principle—which is quite true within itself—that in the big lie there is always a certain force of credibility; because the broad masses of a nation are always more easily corrupted in the deeper strata of their emotional nature than consciously or voluntarily; and thus in the primitive simplicity of their minds they more readily fall victims to the big lie than the small lie, since they themselves often tell small lies in little matters but would be ashamed to resort to large-scale falsehoods.
    It would never come into their heads to fabricate colossal untruths, and they would not believe that others could have the impudence [Chutzpah] to distort the truth so infamously. Even though the facts which prove this to be so may be brought clearly to their minds, they will still doubt and waver and will continue to think that there may be some other explanation. For the grossly impudent lie always leaves traces behind it, even after it has been nailed down, a fact which is known to all expert liars in this world and to all who conspire together in the art of lying”.
    — Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf, vol. I, ch. X

  280. Robjil says:
    @Mulegino1

    On many Jewish websites there is talk about how the Purim theme was used for the hanging of ten top National Socialists. Nuremberg trials were like a Passion Play for Jewish culture.

    http://www.chiefrabbi.co.za/2012/03/purimsphiel-1946-the-purim-link-between-nazi-germany-and-nuclear-iran/

    Julius Streicher figured out the Purim theme going on during the Nuremberg hangings.

    “Something unexpected happened at the execution of Julius Streicher, one of the high-ranking Nazis sentenced to death at the Nuremberg Trials. Moments before Streicher was hanged in the early hours of October 16th 1946, Newsweek reported: “He stared at the witnesses facing the gallows and shouted ‘Purimfest, 1946.’”

    Here is why Streicher thought the hangings were a Purim Passion Play.

    “What did Streicher mean by this? Why would a condemned Nazi mention Purim in his last words? Streicher was obviously familiar with Megillat Esther, which tells of the attempted genocide Haman planned, and how, when his plans were thwarted and they were defeated, Haman and his ten sons were hanged. Streicher was acutely aware of the irony of history – that he was one of ten Nazis hanged after being sentenced at the Nuremberg Trials. (In fact, eleven had been sentenced to death but Goering committed suicide before his sentence was carried out.) And so in the end ten were hanged, just like Haman’s ten sons in the Book of Esther. Amazingly, Streicher saw the historic link between the Nazi genocide and the attempted genocide of Haman, who, like the Nazis, also intended to wipe out every Jew – man, woman and child.”

    How the Jewish year matched the time of the hanging.

    “Since the Torah is G-d’s wisdom for all times, there are often things which cannot be properly understood until generations later. The differences in the font size of the letters in the list of Haman’s ten sons was not completely understood in previous generations. There were other explanations for it, but only in October 1946 did the full meaning of it become clear as ten Nazis were hanged in the Jewish year 5707, tav shin zayin.”

    Jewish holidays timing for the hanging.

    “What is further fascinating is that they were sentenced on the 1st of October, in the days between Rosh Hashana and Yom Kippur of 1946, and hanged on the 16th of October, which that year came out on Hoshana Rabbah, which, according to the Zohar, is the day that judgment of the world is finalized. “

    • Agree: Mulegino1
    • Replies: @Mulegino1
  281. @Ron Unz

    Probably you know it, but anyway.:
    Bolshevik means member of the majority.
    Menshevik means member of minority.
    Division did happen at first party congress.
    Many Ukrainians emigrated to Canada and US and all hated the Bolsheviks.
    Bolsheviks imposed the collectivization.
    Results of collectivization were devastating particularly for Ukraine.

  282. Mulegino1 says:
    @Robjil

    The utter nastiness and vindictive nature of Talmudism serves as a total reproach to those gentiles who not only allow it to continue unhampered but become utterly enslaved to it via subordination or blackmail. How low have those dregs of humanity in the US Congress and shabbos goy Trump sunk?

    Humanity cannot go much lower. Antichrist/Djall/Mosiach is not far away- his system of Sodom and Synagogue of Satan is now fully ensconced in power in the US and EU. Only “the kings of the east” provide some measure of restraint to this beast.

    • Agree: Robjil
  283. Seraphim says:
    @Ron Unz

    Of course the label ‘Judeo-Bolsheviks’ tend to simplify a complex and at times contradictory problem. One should look at the role of Jews in all political parties implicated in the Revolution. So, Cadets, SR’s, Bundists, Zionists. The problem is even more complicated when we take into consideration the Comintern.

    • Replies: @apollonian
  284. You all should read Marks: THE JEWISH QUESTION and than talk about Jews. (Marks actually was not really a Jew lover.)

    • Replies: @Commentator Mike
  285. Seraphim says:
    @Benjy

    “When men choose not to believe in God, they do not thereafter believe in nothing, they then become capable of believing in anything” – G.K. Chesterton.

    Like astrology, ‘illumitism’ (aka illuminism), Rothschild manipulation of the entire planet.

  286. @Germanicus

    Agree.

    The nexus of dönmeh, Wahhabism, House of Saud, the shared penchants for fatwah/psak and beheading infidels/avodah zarah, and the synagogue is another dead giveaway.

  287. @Franklin Ryckaert

    I believe that de Poncins is reliable regarding the trial transcript on Princep:

    Secret Powers Behind Revolution: Freemasonry and Judaism by Vicomte Leon de Poncins, p. 80.

    Consider that it has taken a century for the acknowledgment of Lenin’s Jewish roots on the basis of evidence even more obscure than a trial transcript.

  288. @Germanicus

    The suckers who lap up the lies are also culpable.

    Many have allowed themselves to be thoroughly processed by the devils’/rabbis’ old game of subjectivity, a game of moving goalposts known by many names: Shammai/Hillel, Gevurah/Chesed, thesis/antithesis, right/left. problem/reaction, ad infinitum.

    Many have allowed Satan and his synagogue to seduce them away from objectivity, right and wrong, and into a talmudic game with moving goalposts played on a field of brimstone.

    As a Catholic, I pay special heed to 2 Thessalonians 2:3-11. Men who do not love the truth will be sent the operation of error by God to believe lies.

  289. @Ilyana_Rozumova

    Yes indeed, Marx was no philosemite. On the other hand, if you read Nietzsche carefully on the Jewish question, you will see that he wasn’t an anti-semite. It was so long ago that I read him but I remember getting the distinct impression that Nietzsche actually admired the Jews.

    • Replies: @Ilyana_Rozumova
    , @Seraphim
  290. Benjy says:
    @Germanicus

    E. Michael Jones is highly informative and entertaining. I like to listen to him while driving or working. Here are some good interviews with Tim Kelly:

    https://www.podomatic.com/search?q=michael%20jones

  291. anonymous[761] • Disclaimer says:
    @Tyrion 2

    ‘Also, Google “actions”. Being “kicked” is not doing an action.’

    I implied there were reasons for the kicking hence actions.

    They are widely dispersed because they choose to be. Also they are an ethnicity as well as a religion. Since 1948 they have had thier own ethnostate to move to.

    I will reiterate. If every country I had ever settled in kicked me out I would at least entertain the possibility that I might be doing something to antagonise people.

    • Replies: @Tyrion 2
  292. Seraphim says:
    @follyofwar

    I do not think that Jones made a difference between Christ and logos, because Christ and Logos are the same thing. Christ, the only begotten of the Father [the Son] is the Logos (the Word, the Reason) of God incarnate.

    “In the beginning was the Word (ὁ Λόγος), and the Word was with God, and the Word was God (Θεὸς ἦν ὁ Λόγος). 2 The same was in the beginning with God. 3 All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made. 4 In him was life; and the life was the light of men. 5 And the light shineth in darkness; and the darkness comprehended it not. 6 There was a man sent from God, whose name was John. 7 The same came for a witness, to bear witness of the Light, that all men through him might believe. 8 He was not that Light, but was sent to bear witness of that Light. 9 That was the true Light, which lighteth every man that cometh into the world. 10 He was in the world, and the world was made by him, and the world knew him not. 11 He came unto his own, and his own received him not. 12 But as many as received him, to them gave he power to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on his name: 13 Which were born, not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God. 14 And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth” (John 1:1-14).

    If the world was made by the Logos it is ‘logical’, ordered.

    • Replies: @Germanicus
  293. anonymous[761] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anon

    ‘Pope awarded Ireland to the Catholic Norman rulers of England long before Protestantism arose’

    Pope Adrian the fourth. alao known as Nicholas Breaskpere. the only english pope in history

    Coincidnce?

    • Replies: @Anon
    , @anon
  294. @Anon

    Everyone knows that…hence the name Protestant, to protest against the church. what are you talking about get an education? I didn’t know we were playing “my intellectual dick is bigger than yours”.

    The Protestant Christian religion soon after became the religion of the Powerful British Empire. The rest is history, Archie Bunker!

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  295. Ewan says:

    It is possible for a disproportionate number of Jews in the Bolshevik Party to constitute a minority of Russian Jews and a minority of Bolsheviks. Talk of “Judeo-Bolshevism” would then be a less than objectively truthful epithet.

  296. Tyrion 2 says:
    @anonymous

    If you were the most often welcomed/invited and generally well-treated minority group in world history, you might have cause to feel a vicarious pride.

    I don’t get pride from people I’ve never met’s achievements but whatever.

    Furthermore if, nonetheless, bad things happened to your group you might then be led to question what it is about minority groups as minority groups that tended to leave them vulnerable.

    I’ll go with new right Catholic theorist Rene Girard’s explanation about them being a vulnerable scapegoat.

    Also, ethnicity, religion or even culture are each individually enough to qualify one for being recognised as a Jew. This makes Israel a civic nationalist state with high well-enforced standards by my reckoning. Indeed, if Spain were to adopt Judaism’s definition but use the paternal line as Christianity tends to then almost every single person in South America would qualify for Spanish citizenship.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  297. Anonymous[166] • Disclaimer says:
    @J. Gutierrez

    Everyone knows what? Oh, never mind: it is not worth stoking more emissions from the wild man who writes of the “Zionist Anglo Saxon race”!! You announce yourself as one of those (now few) Catholics who neither knows nor cares what pederast Catholic bishops have done to what was formerly regarded as one of the founts and even pillars of Western Civilisation.

  298. Anon[436] • Disclaimer says:
    @anonymous

    No coincidence probably. But, equally, no coincidence that he was Catholic, French speaking, probably of Norman rather than Anglo-Saxon or Celtic descent.

  299. anon[166] • Disclaimer says:
    @anonymous

    A Norman French speaking Catholic “Englishman”, no coincidence at all.

  300. @Seraphim

    If the world was made by the Logos it is ‘logical’, ordered.

    I’d argue, Logos creates matter, logos is creation.
    What is the word? It is sound at a specific frequency with an amplitude that disturbs the aether. What is thought? The same thing, but thought is necessary to speak the word.

    Regarding IMT Nuremberg:

    As a military tribunal, this Tribunal is a continuation of the war effort of the Allied nations. As an International Tribunal, it is not bound by the procedural and substantive refinements of our respective judicial or constitutional systems, nor will its rulings introduce precedents into any country’s internal system of civil justice. As an International Military Tribunal, it rises above the provincial and transient and seeks guidance not only from international law but also from the basic principles of jurisprudence which are assumptions of civilization and which long have found embodiment in the codes of all nations.

    http://avalon.law.yale.edu/imt/07-26-46.asp

    The same holds true for the so called “Tokio trials”. A mockery of justice, many Us military people knew about.

    “I think those (Nuremberg) trials were the greatest mistake our government could have made and predict that the precedent set will haunt this country for hundreds of years.” – Major General Howard C. Davidson. U.S.A.F World War 11

    “The infamous ‘war crimes trials’ will undoubtedly cause the future inhabitants of this cockeyed planet to blush with embarrassment.” – Robert LeFevre, American educator and author

    “The trials were not based on justice, precedent or international law. They have set a vicious precedent.” – Admiral Laurence T. DuBose, U.S.N. Commander, Cruiser Division. World war II

    “… the ‘war crimes trials’ were a disgrace to our American tradition, and equally as bad, they created a precedent which can only mean liquidation of the entire brains of the United States should Communists prevail in this country.” – Devin E. Garrity, President, Devin-Adair Company. Publishers

    http://www.sweetliberty.org/issues/wars/witness2history/25.html

  301. @Commentator Mike

    I have both Marx and Nietzsche in my library (in French) I did have red them very long time ago in kind of recreational way. But because I am here, so when I will have a time I will reread them in more studying way. Concerning Jews, they are successful because they are hard workers each in his own profession, and the second aspect is their networking, (Through Rabbis,Millennia before internet.}
    But they also often make a bad bet, as in my opinion they made bad bet with US today.
    Concerning Jews in Russia they were never able to control anyone of the General secretaries of the Communist party. In Russia they were delegated to do the dirty work of the party.
    Last one was Beriya, and he did get hanged by Chrushchev in front of his office (KGB headquarters.
    Anyway Jews got fed up and they did move to US where they assumed total control relatively easily.

    • Replies: @apollonian
  302. Mulegino1 says:

    “It is probably unwise to say this loudly in the United, States, but the Bolshevik movement is and has been since its beginning guided and controlled by Russian Jews of the greasiest type, who have been in the United States and there absorbed every one of the worst phases of our civilization without having the least understanding of what we really mean by liberty. (I do not mean the use of the word liberty which has been so widespread in the United States since the war began, but the real word spelt the same way), and the real Russian realizes this and suspects that Americans think as do the loathsome specimens with whom he now comes in contact. I have heard all sorts of estimates as to the real proportion of Bolsheviks to that of the population of Siberia and I think the most accurate is that of General Ivanov-Rinov who estimates it as two per cent. There is hardly a peasant this side of the Urals who has the slightest interest in the Bolshevik or his doings except in so far as it concerns the loss of his own property and, in fact, his point of view is very much like that of our own respectable farmers, when confronted with the…ideal.”

    –Captain Montgomery Schuyler, American Expeditionary Forces Siberia, Intelligence Section

    plus ça change, plus c’est la même chose

  303. Anonymous[332] • Disclaimer says:
    @Tyrion 2

    ‘Also, ethnicity, religion or even culture are each individually enough to qualify one for being recognised as a Jew. This makes Israel a civic nationalist state with high well-enforced standards by my reckoning. ‘

    Your civic nationalist state will not allow persons not born of a jewish mother to marry inside the state or allow them to be buried with other jews. There are high barriers to conversion and Israeli rabbis regularly deem conversions done in the diaspora as invalid.

    Wow you really are delusional.

    • Replies: @Tyrion 2
  304. Tyrion 2 says:
    @Anonymous

    Your civic nationalist state will not allow persons not born of a jewish mother to marry inside the state or allow them to be buried with other jews.

    Israel uses the Ottoman imperial system. It remained in place so as to avoid sectarian conflict.
    It is anti-ethno-nationalist almost by definition. It was born of an Empire that governed through pluralism. Marriage is left for religious groups to affirm. Muslims, Christians and others officiate at legally admissible weddings.

    Obviously converts to any of those religions may also marriage in those religions inside Israel.

    Furthermore, foreign weddings of Israeli citizens are recognised completely.

    There are high barriers to conversion and Israeli rabbis regularly deem conversions done in the diaspora as invalid.

    No all diaspora conversions are invalid. Furthermore, the existence of high standards of entry would be expected in a discerning civic nationalist state. Civic nationalism obviously doesn’t mean open borders or standards so low as to be functionally no borders.

    • Replies: @Anon
  305. Anon[278] • Disclaimer says:
    @jacques sheete

    He was saying you can never meet a Jew, and still meet that attitude round a lot.
    But perhaps Joyce has met Jews only so far in his life.

  306. Anon[278] • Disclaimer says:
    @Tyrion 2

    You can say having to learn Hebrew is, of itself, a very very tough IQ test.
    After all, a genuine conversion will be wanted when the person is at least 30 years old — and if they have no Jewish roots, Hebrew will be a fully unknown language for them, written in a different script than their own.
    Only very high-IQ people can learn a language under those circumstances, especially past-30.

    I am not criticizing it, still. IQ tests may be useful in more than few ways.

    • Agree: Tyrion 2
  307. Seraphim says:
    @Commentator Mike

    Not only that Nietzsche was not an anti-semite, he wanted to shoot the anti-semites!
    His letters to his sister (married to a notorious German nationalist and anti-semite, Bernhard Förster, but the real founder of Nietzsche’s cult) are absolutely clear:

    “This accursed anti-Semitism . . . is the reason for the great rift between myself and my sister” (as quoted in Yovel, [amazon asin=0415095131&text=Nietzsche and Jewish Culture] (edited by Jacob Golomb), p. 121).

    “One of the greatest stupidities you have committed—for yourself and for me! Your association with an anti-Semitic chief expresses a foreignness to my whole way of life which fills me ever again with ire or melancholy. . . . It is a matter of honor to me to be absolutely clean and unequivocal regarding anti-Semitism, NAMELY OPPOSED, AS I AM IN MY WRITINGS. I have been persecuted in recent times with letters and Anti-Semitic Correspondence sheets; MY DISGUST WITH THE PARTY (which would like all too well the advantage of my name!) IS AS OUTSPOKEN AS POSSIBLE, but the relation to Förster, as well as the after-effect of my former anti-Semitic publisher Schmeitzner*, always brings the adherents of this disagreeable party back to the idea that I must after all belong to them. . . . Above all it arouses mistrust against my character, as if I publicly condemned something which I favoured secretly—and that I am unable to do anything against it, that in every Anti-Semitic Correspondence sheet the name Zarathustra is used has already made me sick several times” (as quoted in Kaufmann, [amazon asin=0691160260&text=Nietzsche: Philosopher, Psychologist, Antichrist], p. 45).

    * In 1886, Nietzsche broke with his publisher Ernst Schmeitzner, disgusted by his antisemitic opinions. Nietzsche saw his own writings as “completely buried and unexhumeable in this anti-Semitic dump” of Schmeitzner—associating the publisher with a movement that should be “utterly rejected with cold contempt by every sensible mind”

    Nietzsche was a demented anti-christian, in which he was ‘as outspoken as possible’, precisely under the influence of the Jews (his friends Paul Rée’ – a wealthy ‘assimilated’ Jew and the Russian Jewess Lou Andreas-Salomé – a disciple of Dr. Freud).
    His idolization by the ‘White’ supremacists casts a serious doubt about the very origin of the ‘White’ discourse (basically anti-Christian). Their belief that he was the inspirer of the ‘Nazi racial theory’ is complete BS. He was a vehement denouncer of Wagner’s world-view, the other supposed inspirer of Nazism (as a matter of fact it was not the pseudo-germanic mythology of the Tetralogy that inspired Hitler, but the revolutionary tone of ‘Rienzi, der letzte der Tribunen’ with its Roman themes. Hitler was an admirer of the classical world and he wanted to make Berlin look like Imperial Rome).

    • Replies: @Miro23
  308. Seraphim,

    It was long ago I read his works, but from what I can remember he was also very critical of Germans, the Germanic mentality, character, temperament, etc. Strange that he should have become a prominent influence on the Nazis. But of course Nietzsche and nihilism are also very popular in left wing and anarchist circles.

  309. apollonian says: • Website
    @Ilyana_Rozumova

    Natural CYCLIC Process Of “Decline Of West,” By Spengler

    This, following quote, is interesting comment and needs to be addressed and analyzed:

    “Concerning Jews, they are successful because they are hard workers each in his own profession, and the second aspect is their networking, (Through Rabbis,Millennia before internet.}”

    (a) First thing to be said is Jews are “successful” CRIMINALS–and yes, they are “hard-working” criminals at their criminal trade-craft, like specifically central-banking (see Mises.org for expo) and fiat-currency system–legalized counterfeiting. Just look at US Federal Reserve System–now over 100 yrs old (!) and still cooking along, even if on “last legs”–still we don’t know exactly when it will collapse, which collapse will be timed to most benefit the master-minds at top.

    (b) For Judaism is SATANISM (extreme subjectivism–idea reality is created by mind/consciousness, making subject to be God, the creator–Satanism, by definition), and within a corrupt society–which is CYCLIC phenomenon, apart fm Jews, according to Oswald Spengler’s “Decline of the West”–Jews are most dedicated and organized Satanists, and will naturally succeed, dominate, and lead. See Talmudical.blogspot.com, RevisionistReview.blogspot.com, and Come-and-hear.com for expo.

    (c) Jews succeed as (1) the circumstances (Western “decline”) are ripe, ready, and receptive, within growing corruption and satanistic/subjectivistic gentiles, who are however relatively dis-organized, (2) Jews being COLLECTIVISTICALLY organized, dedicated, motivated, w. most practical, efficient “group-think” and motivation towards Satanism, etc.

    So the struggle against Jews is struggle against Satanism, hence against subjectivism and hubris which are given pretext by (a) non-existent “good-evil,” which is for children and dogs, and (b) non-existent perfectly “free” human will which goes along w. HUBRIS and afore-mentioned non-existent “good-evil” for over-populated fools, goons, suckers, inferiors, and weaklings, who were bred-up fm original conqueror/founding generations of a now corrupt, declining empire/culture.

    Thus the necessary, CYCLIC “Decline of the West” cannot be avoided, BUT it can be precipitated and speeded-up in order to achieve a “new beginning.” People need merely understand the sociologic conditions of the corruption and Satanism founded in subjectivism, hubris, and especially, false moralism sought by gullible, over-populated, hubristic inferiors, goons, suckers, and weaklings in the stage of historic CYCLIC process and “decline” phase of culture, etc.

  310. @Wizard of Oz

    No. Wealth in the 1600’s was almost entirely a function of the land and peasants that you controlled.

    There’s a great book “Cider with Rosie” by Laurie Lee describing his coming of age years just after the Great War, He describes a way of life largely unchanged for half a millennium. It’s a great read, I recommend it.

    Wealth was not a financial function until the early 20th Century. Then the flows to the bankers was exactly as in the US.

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
  311. apollonian says: • Website
    @Seraphim

    “Complexity” Is Really Simple, Necessary, Given Circumstances

    Well of course, “seraphim”–it’s precisely what Judeo-bolshies WANT thou to doing, right?–make things seem “complex”–muddy the waters w. complications.

    Basic cultural problem is the natural, determinist course and CYCLIC “Decline of the West,” by Oswald Spengler. And within the otherwise chaotic “decline” phase caused by HUBRIS and over-populated inferiors, weaklings, goons, and suckers, bred-up by the initially successful founders–as in Roman and American instances of inevitable empire–we see the rise and thriving of SATANISM (extreme subjectivism making reality to be mere product of mind/consciousness, the subject now being God, the creator–Satanism, by definition).

    Thus Jews are simply the leading, dominant Satanists, Jews, by definition, proponents of “midrash” (interpretation) and “Oral Law Tradition,” Judaism actually most practical, successful specific brand and exercise of Satanism–see Talmudical.BlogSpot.com, RevisionistReview.BlogSpot.com, and Come-and-hear.com for expo–Jews practicing a COLLECTIVISTIC subjectivism, most effective “group-think,” thus leading all the dis-organized and random gentile subjectivists/Satanists, even though Jews far out-numbered.

    Thus all the confusion and “complexity” is deliberate (and necessary) for purpose of cloaking and masking the real operators acting internally and behind-scenes in secrecy amidst all the bustling confusion–as we see is and was the case in history and reality.

  312. Seraphim says:

    I am amused at your (not so) subtle suggestion that I am a Jew. It is as amusing as your conviction that you belong to the superior layer of the population -the empire founders.

    • Disagree: apollonian
  313. @Bill Jones

    In that context what was the effect of the US dropping the gold standard (whatever version of it it was then) in the early 70s? I have long been one who is unimpressed by the simple dogmatic views propounded here and elsewhere about money. After all, if everyone trusted that the pieces of inscribed paper handed out by the missionaries were really as good for exchange as undamaged conch shells or pearls of standard size then any trusted person could create money by inscribing pieces of paper appropriately.

    • Troll: apollonian
    • Replies: @Bill Jones
  314. @Wizard of Oz

    “any trusted person could create money by inscribing pieces of paper appropriately.”

    And that has been done in the past. Bank Notes were not the monopoly of the Central Bank.
    Prior to about 1850 you deposited your money- usually gold and silver in a bank for safe-keeping,( and they charged you for that safe keeping) the Bank issued you a note describing what you had deposited and the note- essentially a warehouse receipt , was redeemable for the specific items deposited.
    That note , if issued by a reputable institution . was bartered, traded and exchanged as if it was the things described on it: So much easier than moving physical metals from your warehouse(or bank) to that of the seller of whatever you were buying.
    Money can be anything as long as it fulfills three functions.

    A means of exchange,
    A unit of account,
    A store of value.

    Other than precious metals: or rare Cowrie shells on a desert island, all monies have failed over time, usually on the third count.

    A dollar of paper money issued a century ago is worth three cents or so now,
    An ounce of gold is an ounce of gold and today will buy you a decent suit just as it would 100 years ago.

    I have, in an old wallet, French Franc’s, Spanish Peseta’s , Deutschmarks, all worth nothing.

  315. Most people here are horribly uneducated re history & politics. All I can do is recommend a few books. Sorry, I can’t do more for you bozos (non-bozos excepted)….

    [MORE]

    • Troll: apollonian
    • Replies: @utu
  316. @redmudhooch

    In response to RedMudHootch’s data on former Czarist officers in both the Bolshevik (Red) Army and Volunter (White) Army, his data is way off base and he also doesn’t mention the hostage policy practices by the Bolshevik (Red) Army. This involved holding a former Czarist army/naval officer’s family hostage so that he would serve. This is how the Red Army was able to keep these officers and their experience to create it and defeat the Whites.

    Colonel Robert A. Lynn, Florida Guard

  317. Che Guava says:

    Socialist Workers Party, essentially the remnants of Britain’s Communist Party

    Dr. Joyce. I enjoy much of your writing, thank you for it.

    The above statement, though, is a big blunder, absolutely incorrect.

    The SWP was (is still, perhaps) the name of one of the two bigger Brit. (well, Jewish leaders) Trotskyite parties.

    So, of course, they were enemies of the CP-GB.

    Surprised to see you writing such an error.

    I could continue re. aspects of the entomology (not sic, intentional) of Trots, but too many comments in this thread now.

  318. @Militaryhistorywriter

    Irrelevant!!!!
    Germans came and built Lenin a machine gun factory. (as promised.)
    The rest is history.
    Whites were finished.

  319. @Al Liguori

    Being indiscriminate antisemitic is primitive inefficient, and I do have to say stupid.
    Every aspect of the policies have to be analyzed to the smallest detail and to determinate if it is beneficial or harmful to the nation, or it is beneficial only to Jews and harmful to the nation.

  320. db says:
    @Ron Unz

    Hatred of and for the “Jews” may indeed be valid, especially if all the allegations made against them as a “race” down thru the ages are true.

    BUT, me thinks the hatred is most intense from the wannabes, the “losers”.

    Because my conclusion after residing on this planet for about 60 years is that the TROUGH is always filled to the brim with the most capricious SWINE intent on muscling their way in and staying there as long as they can, while the less crafty are pushed aside, and stomped on, and the more ingenious genuflecting for table scraps.

    Thus it has been, and thus it will be forever more.

    It is called the “human race” for a reason….and I can only hope humanity never makes it off this planet to carry its seed elsewhere to infect worlds throughout the galaxy, and God forbid, the rest of the Universe.

    Amen.

  321. Che Guava says:
    @Anonymous

    Thank you for the reply.

    From the few I knew closely, I think I see what you mean.

  322. @Militaryhistorywriter

    Dear Ms. Rozumova,
    In regard to your comment about irrelevant I will chalk it up to your ignorance of military history. While Imperial Germany did supply money, weapons, and other equipment to the Bolsheviks during those crazy and chaotic times, it has always been TRAINING and EXPERIENCE that have been the two things that won wars. The Imperial Russian Army had numerous types of machine guns with matching ammunition but unless you know how to use and deploy any weapon systems, you might as well be spitting in the wind.

    Colonel Robert A. Lynn Florida Guard

  323. Mulegino1 says:
    @db

    …the TROUGH is always filled to the brim with the most capricious SWINE intent on muscling their way in and staying there as long as they can, while the less crafty are pushed aside, and stomped on, and the more ingenious genuflecting for table scraps.

    Ironically, that is exactly what Jewry does to the nations it attaches itself to as parasite to healthy host.

  324. annamaria says:
    @Rational

    Perhaps the saddest statement of the article is this one:

    “Given this history, the purpose of studying the Judeo-Bolshevik myth must be not to determine how true it is. [p.5]” Yes, he actually wrote that! I actually had to read this sentence three times before reassuring myself this was in fact a sentence published by what remains, for the time being, one of the most respected academic publishing institutions on the planet.

    Actually, the academically anemic and contorted book by Hanebrink could serve as a gravestone for the previously respected Harvard University Press. — Harvard University Press is not a respected academic publishing institution anymore. Harvard University Press (established n 1913) has become a nest of hacks and dishonest ignoramuses and opportunists.

    Also, why this “historian” Paul Hanebrink is so exceptionally unbecoming .. actually, plain ugly?

    • Agree: Robjil
  325. annamaria says:
    @Commentator Mike

    Lack of scruples? Tribal cohesiveness that easily makes truth and dignity and justice into victims of tribal promotion?

  326. apollonian says: • Website
    @db

    If Humans Really DON’T “Live By Bread Alone,” WHAT Then Will Be Ideals?

    “Db” tells us, in typical oracular fashion, as if he’s made some amazing discovery,

    “BUT, me thinks the hatred is most intense from the wannabes, the “losers”.

    “Because my conclusion after residing on this planet for about 60 years is that the TROUGH is always filled to the brim with the most capricious SWINE intent on muscling their way in and staying there as long as they can, while the less crafty are pushed aside, and stomped on, and the more ingenious genuflecting for table scraps.”

    But Christianity teaches we’re all sinners, and of course jealousy of the Jews is thematic, why wouldn’t it be?–they have the power and the wealth, and I’d like to snatch just a bit of it, why not?–such is humanity, always has been, always will be. The “losers” tried, but failed, and so they resent the “winners”–so what?–what’s so difficult to grasp, given sinful human nature?

    And don’t forget, sucker–we haven’t entirely “lost” till we quit trying, right? One is a “loser”–UNTIL that moment when one finally (if ever) “wins”–only to die soon after fm drinking and over-eating, eh? Ho ho ho ho ho. Such is putrid human life on planet earth–it’s always been that way.

    So humans aren’t much diff. fm “swine”–so what?–is this any great discovery?–congratulations.

    The real pt. (if there is one) to things is to figuring-out how reality works–hence we see (a) reality is OBJECTIVE, according to Christ (= TRUTH, Gosp. JOHN 14:6) and Aristotle, (b) hence DETERMINED (by absolute, strict cause-effect, there being no perfectly “free” human will), (c) hence CYCLIC for history and sociology, which is real pt. (again, if there is one) to things.

    Once we realize the nature of that CYCLIC process, we can then gain a most accurate picture of where we are, where we were, and then, perhaps, where we might soon be. For the “less crafty” are not merely “pushed aside and stomped on”–they’re often TOTALLY EXTERMINATED, in accord w. the Darwinian nature of things. And this all happens according to a CYCLIC pattern and process.

    Presently, we “losers” (if we’re not careful) are liable to being exterminated in accord w. Agenda-21 and -2030 GENOCIDE–all in the name of “peace” and “sustainable development,” etc.

    So what will happen?–well “losers” will continue to being eliminated, according to the CYCLIC process, till the number of “Shabbat goyim” are reduced to pt. that the topmost masterminds will become evermore short-handed, and will look at one another w. such great suspicion–like Stalin and Trotsky–that they will begin to falling-out and seriously in-fighting–this then will be goyim’s only chance to succeed in a revolt in order to start (rational) society again.

    So grasping real nature of this (CYCLIC) reality is KEY to any plan and planning–that’s why we uphold Christian rationality–even if so many of the goyim don’t care to understand, relish, and uphold it as such great ideal–still we strive to persuading them it’s best chance for survival against satanic psychopaths, mass-murderers, and monstrosities. For humans don’t merely live by “bread” alone, as the saying goes, and some system of opposed ideals needs to be understood by whoever will and hopes to strive and survive.

  327. @Anonymous

    The Christian right of 50 years ago was rather segregationist and anti-Semitic by way of anti-communism. You’ve probably read of Billy Graham’s conversation with Nixon about the need to do something about Jewish influence in the media. Those people seem to have died off, but maybe they have just been drowned out by the neocons and folks who think Jesus won’t return unless Israel is sovereign in Palestine. While the paleo-evangelicals have little chance of visible leadership positions in the current climate, maybe there are still a good number of them around. Personally, I don’t see what would motivvate someone to “join” the Alt Right if they are happy with the social changes fostered by Jewish progressivism.
    I agree that Christians sucking up to Israel can be pretty cringe-inducing. It might be a helpful “ministry” to clue these people in to the dark side of Israeli power.

  328. Miro23 says:
    @Seraphim

    (as a matter of fact it was not the pseudo-germanic mythology of the Tetralogy that inspired Hitler, but the revolutionary tone of ‘Rienzi, der letzte der Tribunen’ with its Roman themes. Hitler was an admirer of the classical world and he wanted to make Berlin look like Imperial Rome).

    Yes, and there’s been a big effort to bury this fact.

    The pre WW2 British elite were great classicists (in fact right through the 19th century). They learnt Greek and Latin at school and didn’t want Hitler associated with their “religion”.

    Richard Jenkyns wrote a superb book about it, “The Victorians and Ancient Greece”.

    • Replies: @Seraphim
  329. Seraphim says:
    @Miro23

    Now, the cult of classical Greece and Rome was widespread in all Western Europe since the Renaissance. But certainly it is not the reason why the British elite did not want to associate Hitler with this cult, but with their cult for the Jews and Jewish money.

  330. utu says:
    @Bardon Kaldian

    Trying to atone for members of your family running the Jasenovac camp?

  331. Articulate, brilliant review. Thank you, Mr Joyce, for your analysis.

  332. Che Guava says:
    @Commentator Mike

    Btw, mea culpa for not having more carefully read your first reply.

    It is doubtless true, and a little humorous.

    At times, I react in a similar way as when an admin on a now-dead but popular U.S.-based wiki, (u-names to suggest authority forced to change or being banned, in the case of my excessively sharp reply to you), only on occasion, and usually correct.

    Again, it is instinctive, and if tired and a little drunk, impatient for sleeping, sometimes careless.

    In case you didn’t notice, this thread was derailed much before, last I was checking, the last relevant post pre. this of mine, was my pointing out to Andrew Joyce, Ph.D., that at least one minor assertion in his article was grossly incorrect.

    Please check it, Mlke.

    Much as I like some of his writing, it does him no credit to ignore the one comment that is clearly refuting one of his claims, although he is correct in general.

    Many commentators here don’t read the comments. Understable, half of the time they are reposted from elsewhere.

    Wednesday of this week was Ash Wednesday.

  333. anon[592] • Disclaimer says:
    @Commentator Mike

    Great comment. Everything , the Zionist touches turns into fecal drops of rodents and cockroaches .

    In 2002, when the 911 was not enough to force people of the entire world into submission to Zionist , the Zionist embarked upon more mayhem – the engaged into Anthrax attack in America ,carried out massive parliament attack in Mexico.
    and created more or less constants running and dripping of threats somewhere in the universe .

    Abusing people’s plight whether in Russia in 1900 or Egypt in BC era and in US in 2001 – it’s the same MO – it is in their DNA .

    MEXICAN ATTORNEY GENERAL RELEASES ZIONIST TERRORISTS

    ARMY GEBERAL AND HEAD OF PGR RELEASES TWO ISRAELIS ARRESTED WITH GUNS AND EXPLOSIVES INSIDE THE MEXICAN CONGRESS —

    by Ernesto Cienfuegos
    La Voz de Aztlan

    ” Los Angeles ,Alta California–Oct 15,2001 ( ACN)

    • Replies: @anarchyst
  334. @AnonFromTN

    I wouldn’t deign to argue with you or Ron Unz on this (you’re being from Russia, and he having delved into this subject, while I haven’t). However, as far as the Soviet support of the arabs vs. US support for Israel, I’ve been paying attention to politics along time, and I’ve been under the impression that this was just more proxy-war Cold-War era business.

    The US, of course, has/had reasons to support Israel that we all know about. The Soviets took the other side for the same reason they supported the other side in the civil war in Angola and dozens of deals like this all over the world.

    • Replies: @AnonFromTN
  335. @onebornfree

    But you’ll never get that, and that’s OK

    [NOTE: no smiley face from me] It’d be OK, 1-bornfree, if this guy were just one of a few hundred thousand idiots on the internet. The problem is there are millions now, not just on the internet, but running around with masks and bike locks, and becoming leaders of the Blue squad, that take this stupidity VERY VERY SERIOUSLY.

    It’s that time of the century, folks, when the Commies start crawling out of the woodwork again We’re gonna need a bigger can of RAID.

  336. @Wally

    And your problem with libertarians is

    … liberty is too scary for him. He needs something like a babysitter throughout adulthood, like all Socialists desire, to “make things fair”, and redistribute some of the Halloween candy. He would like us to pay for said babysitter, but with no fringe benefits.

  337. @Achmed E. Newman

    You have a point. Both the US and the USSR during Cold war often acted on the principle “my enemy’s enemy is my friend”. This stupidity actually continues in Cold War 2.0, except now the US cannot even pretend that it acts against communism, so they have to demonize Russia as such (nothing new: it’s been done by Europeans before 1917).

    • Replies: @Achmed E. Newman
  338. @Che Guava

    No sweat kameraden (or should it be comerade?) Guava! I can’t help joking sometimes and your user name was appealing. I am myopic but sometimes I wonder if I’m dyslexic too because I often misread words, especially when I’m fast reading. Did you ever post comments on the old altright.com? I didn’t but I used to read it. Anyway I remember seeing your user name in some comments somewhere before.

    I actually swore at someone in a comment earlier but he was abusive in his comments to another so it annoyed me, but later I regretted it. I have sometimes edited harsh words out of comments just before publishing, but not always. I try to keep the debate civilised but these are some posters who drag you down to the lowest common denominator if you engage with them. I think UR is quite free of invective compared to some other sites – perhaps because there is less censorship of the content so less frustration as you’re free to express yourself as you like (people here have even advocated and called for violence – something forbidden on other sites).

    I am often sarcastic and cynical but don’t think I’m without a conscience, social or otherwise. But yes, it’s always unpleasant for the one who is at the receiving end of a joke.

  339. @Che Guava

    re: your comment regarding the SWP.

    Absolutely correct. Being a Brit Andrew should know better. The SWP never had anything to do with the CPGB, and if anything was often opposed to it.

    Just out of curiosity, didn’t the US have its own SWP which had nothing to do with the British SWP, other than being Trotskyite?

  340. anarchyst says:
    @anon

    The first modern-day display of jewish arrogance outfight was the destruction of the political campaign of Austria’s Kurt Waldheim, accusing him of German National Socialism sympathies. (I refuse to use the term “Nazi”) It was clear that jewish outsiders derailed his campaign and that they showed no restraint in doing so–“chutzpah” at its best.
    This is when jews finally realized that they could now get away with anything, sticking their jewish noses into any foreign country’s politics, while uttering “muh holocaust”.
    Here in the USA, the jewish infiltration into American politics started with Israel’s and President Lyndon Johnson’s “false flag” attack on the USS Liberty (GTR-5) which was not successful. The subsequent treasonous “cover-up” and indifference to the military personnel who endured this “act of war” by our “friend and ally, Israel, “sealed the deal”. Israel then KNEW that it could get away with murder, subversion, treason and the destruction of any country on earth.

    • Replies: @annamaria
  341. @AnonFromTN

    Man, we are waaaayyy down this thread, so thanks for the reply (I’ve only gotten through about 1/4 of the comments, and I’m pretty hard-core about reading them all, once I get started).

    I don’t think this was stupidity at all during the Cold War. The plans for whose missiles could hit whose other missiles, bases etc., where the tanks would come through, etc. were very serious. Whether the US needed to worry about the USSR/China turning the whole world Commie or whether the Soviets really thought that America was the imperialist swine (that we’ve become now) is something much more easy to see only in hindsight.

    It was important at the time for us to keep the Commies out of Latin America, keep them off out “our” resources in Africa, etc. Things are completely different nowadays. However, the elite neocons have done a great job in convincing people that don’t know SQUAT about politics and history, that, oh, yeah, those bad Russians are at it again. I wonder if 50% of Americans don’t even understand the difference between the old Soviet Union and current-era Russia.

    • Replies: @AnonFromTN
  342. annamaria says:
    @anarchyst

    “Here in the USA, the jewish infiltration into American politics started with Israel’s and President Lyndon Johnson’s “false flag” attack on the USS Liberty (GTR-5) … Israel then KNEW that it could get away with murder, subversion, treason and the destruction of any country on earth.”

    — Time to invoke the names of the traitorous McCains:
    Like father, http://fathersmanifesto.net/admiralmccain.htm

    like son, https://america-hijacked.com/2011/09/02/john-mccain-praises-fathers-whitewashing-of-israels-attack-on-the-uss-liberty/

    https://rense.com/general96/navyreleases.htm

    … both of these ‘McCains’ were, and still are, traitors to the United States and to the US Constitution. Neither ‘man’ has ever been punished for what they did while wearing U.S. uniforms…

    • Replies: @annamaria
    , @anon
  343. annamaria says:
    @annamaria

    And now this pox on the US press: “Meghan McCain Is An Idiot [and a shameless and ugly one]” https://lovebreedsaccountability.com/2018/06/16/enough-already-meghan-mccain-is-an-idiot/

    She’s a spoiled rotten little mean girl with an unduly inflated sense of self-worth

  344. @Achmed E. Newman

    Happy reading! Some comments are sensible, some thought-provoking, but some deserve only contempt, regardless whether the authors are trolls, non-trolls brainwashed to the point of having no brain left, or simply intellectually challenged individuals.

    You hit the nail on the head. The propaganda of the Empire and its boot-lickers works hard to prevent people from understanding the difference between the old Soviet Union and current-era Russia. It is helped in this task by widespread woeful ignorance of the population. CNN journos placing Ukraine somewhere in Pakistan live on camera, or demented House member Maxine Waters not knowing the difference between Crimea and Korea are typical examples.

  345. anon[228] • Disclaimer says:
    @annamaria

    https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2019/02/18/private-mossad-for-hire
    An adviser there referred him to Psy-Group, an Israeli private intelligence company. Psy-Group’s slogan was “Shape Reality,”

    In Gabon, Psy-Group pitched “Operation Bentley”—an effort to “preserve” President Ali Bongo Ondimba’s hold on power by collecting and disseminating intelligence about his main political rival

    Most Psy-Group employees knew little or nothing about the company’s owner, Joel Zamel. According to corporate documents filed in Cyprus, he was born in Australia in 1986. Zamel later moved to Israel, where he earned a master’s degree in government, diplomacy, and strategy, with a specialization in counterterrorism and homeland security

    In an early test of concept, a Psy-Group operative created a Facebook account for an avatar named Madison. Burstien’s idea was to use Madison as a virtual honey trap. The avatar’s Facebook page depicted Madison as an average American teen-ager from a Christian family in Chicago. She was a fan of Justin Bieber, and after graduating from high school she took a job at a souvenir shop. She posted Facebook messages about religion and expressed interest in learning more about Islam. Eventually, a Facebook member from Casablanca introduced Madison online to two imams at Moroccan mosques, one of whom offered to guide her through the process of becoming a Muslim.
    Madison’s conversion was conducted through Skype. The call required a female Psy-Group employee to bring Madison to life briefly and chant the Shahada, a profession of faith, from a desk in the company’s offices. “Finally! I’m a Muslim,” Madison wrote on Facebook. “I feel at home.” She added a smiley-face emoticon.
    After her conversion, Madison began to come into contact with Facebook members who espoused more radical beliefs. One of her new friends was an ISIS fighter in Raqqa, Syria, who encouraged her to become an ISIS bride. At that point, Burstien decided to end the operation, which, he felt, had demonstrated the company’s ability to create convincing “deep” avatars. Not long afterward, he sent representatives to pitch State Department officials on an influence campaign, “modeled on the successful ‘Madison’ engagement,” that would “interrupt the radicalization and recruitment chain.

    In early meetings with donors, in New York, Burstien said that the key to mounting an effective anti-B.D.S. campaign was to make it look as though Israel, and the Jewish-American community, had nothing to do with the effort

    Psy-Group employees had recently travelled to Washington to visit officials at a think tank called the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, which had shared some of its research on the B.D.S. movement. In a follow-up meeting, which was attended by Burstien, Psy-Group provided F.D.D. with a confidential memo describing how it had compiled dossiers on nine activists, including a lecturer at the University of California, Berkeley. In the memo, Psy-Group asked the foundation for guidance on identifying future targets.

    Zamel often operated independently of Burstien, and it’s unclear how closely the two coördinated, but both saw the Trump campaign as a potential client. Trump’s vocal support for Israel and his hard-line views on Iran appealed to Zamel, and he reached out to Trump’s inner circle. In early May, 2016, Zamel sent an e-mail to Gingrich, saying that he could provide the Trump campaign with powerful tools that would use social media to advance Trump’s chances. Zamel suggested a meeting in Washington to discuss the matter further.

  346. There are plenty of factual items searchable via internet, that identify the leaders and supporters, of the Russian Political Opposition Party, as being Jews. They hate Putin and what he stands for; yet they are tolerated, “It’s all about the Benjamin’s baby”. Bill Browder can explain if you have any doubts.

    • Replies: @annamaria
  347. One Tribe says:

    Of course, on this topic, there is so much dis-assemblage of false narrative that it makes intelligent, fact-based analyses very difficult and cumbersome; on top of the fact discussion is effective censored under the auspicious of the empire.

    The term ‘jew‘ was developed in the mid-1800s with a primary objective of intimidating European goy (mostly christian, btw).

    A better descriptor is adherents of Rabbinical Phariseeism.
    I prefer Torah Talmud Rabbinical Phariseeism, but it become tedious to include in discussions.

    The myth of ‘judeo-christianity‘:
    Another term created by the same … group, that brought us the term ‘jew‘, this one with the purpose of creating the illusion of similarity, thus enlist the weak-minded from the ‘Roman Catholic’ … faith, as allies, and as they would refer to it ‘shabbosh goys‘ (goy slaves/servants).

    The truth is far from this narrative of alignment, in reality, the so-called religion of the adherents of Rabbinical Phariseeism, use the Torah, a sub-section of the so-called ‘Old Testament‘ as an allegory for deciphering the correct behaviours, as presented in the voluminous Talmud.

    [MORE]

    In summary of the instructions, obviously concatenated, for the sheer size of the Talmud is intimidating:
    a. all of the brotherly love and do unto others as one would have done to you, applies to fellow adherents of Rabbinical Phariseeism only.
    b. all of the burn them to the ground, and vengeance and wiping out their line, raping all their women, etc. etc stuff, applies to the goys, who are viewed as animals, only looking like humans so as to be better servants for … jews (make them more comfortable, and less… worried, or something).

    This contexts brings us to the interesting question of “the good jew“?
    1. It is accepted among… well the jew commenters on the question, that most jews are not, in fact, religious at all.
    (please note: I use the term ‘the jew commenter’, because effectively, only jews are permitted to talk about jews in the empire.)
    2. So, the question, what does being a jew actually mean?!?
    I feel, that when you strip all the static away, and boil it down to the last thing that if taken away, what would be left would ‘no longer be a jew‘, is a fundamental, deep-rooted discrimination against all out-group (not officially recognized as ‘a jew‘) people.

    As discrimination on the basis of affiliation is recognized as unlawful in most jurisdictions under the empire, is there really such a thing as ‘a good jew‘?

    One more thing, the race thing:
    Of course, we all should be familiar with the basis of the primary defamation system used against all goy who speak about jews, anti-semite, another term invented in the mid-1800s to stifle discussion about, jews.
    This is a term which inherently refers to racial discrimination, which, like other forms of discrimination, is unlawful in the empire, but has been elevated to the primary evil discrimination… likely by… you know who (on the basis of incredibly clear consistency).
    1. there is no such thing as ‘race’; in an open breeding system, all of humanity, which has approximately the same genetic variation as one social unit (approximately 100 individuals) of our closed species cousins, chimpanzees, becomes an analogue gradient of genetic traits.
    2. besides y-chromosome, paternal heredity, and mitochondrial DNA (m-DNA) maternal heredity, there is no reliable persistent DNA progression through multiple (>3) generations; furthermore, there is little-to-no valid proof of relationship between these genetic markers and behaviour!?
    3. even if you believe in ‘race‘, the vast majority of the people who self-identify as jew, are not of demonstrable semitic heritage, in fact the largest quazi-national group of demonstrably semitic heritage are… Palestinians; making the most rabidly systemically ‘anti-semetic‘ group on the planet are… non-Arab Israelis.

  348. annamaria says:
    @THOMAS W ADAMS

    What the Russan Federation and Syria have been standing against for the last few years:https://russia-insider.com/en/politics/finally-confirmed-us-created-isis-terror-group/ri7364

    …the US was forming “temporary alliances” with al-Qaeda affiliated “nationalist insurgent groups” that have fought the US for four years in the form of “weapons and cash.”

    The 2012 DIA document … shows that while sponsoring purportedly former al-Qaeda insurgents in Iraq to counter al-Qaeda, Western governments were simultaneously arming al-Qaeda insurgents in Syria.

    The revelation from an internal US intelligence document that the very US-led coalition supposedly fighting ‘Islamic State’ today, knowingly created ISIS in the first place, raises troubling questions about recent government efforts to justify the expansion of state anti-terror powers.

  349. Zorro says:

    The significant criticism of Hanebrink’s 300 plus page screed is this: not one footnote to the real Jewish Bolsheviks as per the greatest 20th century author Alexandr Solzhenitsyn in the two volume work titled, 200 hundred years together.

  350. @Ron Unz

    Well, it gets even worse when you consider that the same people are endeavoring to rewrite our history concerning the financial support provided to the Bolsheviks from Western institutions. Jacob Shiff and Kohn Loeb and company were prominent. Later we find Armand Hammer of Occidental oil practically hiding in plain sight as the primary benefactor of the Soviet states. Perhaps we have all been hypnotized in apparent cognitive dissonance.

    • Replies: @Seraphim
  351. @db

    Exactly, if you want historical revisionism you will have to study the subtle techniques of the masters.

  352. Seraphim says:
    @frank frivilous

    @we have all been hypnotized in apparent cognitive dissonance.

    We have been, indeed. The ‘help’ of the banking cartel was a well known fact, well publicized at the time.
    The anti-Tsarist propaganda was in full swing in America since the formation of “The Society of American Friends of Russian Freedom (SAFRF) in April 1891 in Boston at Russian émigré Stepniak-Kravchinskii instigation.
    A major role was played by George Kennan (the ‘Elder’), journalist, explorer, lecturer, one of the founders of the National Geographic Society. Kennan began freelancing, initially for The Century Magazine. In 1885 he returned to Russia (where he has been previously) for an investigative report on the Russian prison system. Since he had previously written favorable things about the country, the Tsarist government was quite accommodating. But the serialized account of his findings that appeared in the Century starting in 1888, followed by a two-volume book, Siberia and the Exile System, published in 1891, exposed the cruelties of the regime and changed the course of American thinking toward Russia. He was the great uncle of George F. Kennan (the ‘Younger’), the champion of Russia ‘containment’.
    The Society launched into campaigns of fund raising for the victims of the ‘horrific atrocities and pogroms in Russia’.
    “The society organized the propagandist campaign of the Russian émigré Breshko-Breskovskaia in 1904-1905 in the USA. George Kennan, revealed in the New York Times on 24 March 1917, that Jacob Schiff of Kuhn, Loeb Bank on Wall Street financed Russian revolutionaries through this organization. Schiff had been financing Russian revolutionaries since 1905”.

    • Replies: @frank frivilous
  353. @Seraphim

    Interesting. I can’t remember where I read it now, but I understand that Kuhn Loeb also provided substantial loans to Imperial Japan during their war with Russia in 1905.

  354. Seraphim says:

    It is well known that he did, as well as financing through Kennan, the ‘revolutionary’ propaganda among the Russian POW in Japanese camps.

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Andrew Joyce Comments via RSS
PastClassics
The “war hero” candidate buried information about POWs left behind in Vietnam.
Are elite university admissions based on meritocracy and diversity as claimed?
What Was John McCain's True Wartime Record in Vietnam?
Hundreds of POWs may have been left to die in Vietnam, abandoned by their government—and our media.