The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 Richard Parker Archive
Leftist Indoctrination, Family Betrayal, and a Book Deal
A Summary and Analysis of Leonie Plaar’s Meine Familie, die AfD, und Ich
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
List of Bookmarks

Mit besonderem Dank an ,,Volker, dem Unbekannten.”

A Concise Summary of Leonie Plaar, Her Family, Her Politics, and This Book

Leonie Plaar, better known as Frau Löwenherz, is a radical left influencer in Germany, whose public personage can be best described as lesbian, antifa, and an adamant proponent for the effort to ban Alternative für Deutschland (AfD). Lamentably, Plaar has some degree of influence, with over 131 thousand followers on her German language TikTok account and over half a million followers on her English language account. She has a somewhat more modest presence on Instagram, with a German language account of approximately 80 thousand followers (it has recently dipped below 80k), and over 30 thousand followers on an English language account.[1]Archives of the respective pages in question have been provided so as not to contribute to page count. Those readers who wish to peruse her content can search for it more proactively on any search engine of choice. She has appeared on various talk show segments on German television, although not without controversy and ridicule. Perhaps worst of all, she was recently given a book deal by Goldmann Verlag and Penguin Deutschland, as Meine Familie, die AFD, und Ich (My Family, the AfD, and I) was published last month, September 2025. This contemptible screed, which recounts her decision to break off contact with her family, her father in particular, is the focus of this essay, with an in-depth summary and analysis set forth below.

Leonie Plaar walking about the streets of Edinburgh, a perfect juxtaposition of European society and culture on one hand and the archetype of a certain group of individuals working headlong not just for the demise of Germany and the German people, but European civilization and posterity writ large. Her phenotype, including pale skin, long blonde hair, and a statuesque frame augments this juxtaposition. Dressed in black attire, she appears like a fallen Valkyrie, irretrievably corrupted and tainted by a pernicious cultural milieu that has been installed by the Western Allies and tirelessly cultivated after Germany’s capitulation.

Those who have followed Plaar knew about this decision for some time; she even talked about it on during a presentation sponsored by TINCON, an organization geared towards indoctrinating German youth with far-left claptrap. Disparaging her family, particularly her father, in such a manner was not enough, as she has now capitalized on this with this book. It is currently a Der Spiegel bestseller, but, as is the case with The New York Times bestseller list, there is reason to doubt the veracity of such numbers. German contacts have informed this author that the Der Spiegel bestseller list is even more dubious than its New York Times counterpart. The implication of this is that her book may not be nearly as wide read as feared. Even granting such suspicions their due, some at least are reading this screed, just as at least some of the 80ish thousand followers on Instagram have to be real, to say nothing of the half million on TikTok.[2]There is always reason to suspect follower count manipulation or fraud. Allegations that Ellen Woodburry, also known as Pizzacake Comics, has marshalled large numbers of bot accounts to inflate follower count are persuasive to many. Readers are encouraged to search on their own to discover certain conversations on certain unnamable platforms for more information. It is for this reason that cultural and political expressions such as those by Plaar require the strict attention and scrutiny of those who oppose such ruinous politics and ideology.

Both the subject matter as well as the writing style, which includes more than just a few forays into excessive Anglicisms , render the reading of this book a most unenviable task indeed—the last two words of the book are the English phrase “quite happy.” As to be expected from leftist ideologues like Plaar, her writing also engages in an insidious practice known in current-day Germany as Gendern. Regarded by its proponents as the newest iteration of geschlechtergerechte Sprache,[3]Loosely translated as gender neutral language. Before the rise of transgender nuttery and radical gender ideology, proponents implored the use of both masculine and feminine forms in the plural, eg die Lehrer und die Lehrerinnen. The left of course never stops, so it has devolved further into the use of the Gendersternchen. this practice eschews using nouns referring to persons in their traditional, gendered forms. For example, rather than using die Lehrer (“teachers” with a generic masculine form). this affliction on the German language, known as the Gendersternchen, denotes “teachers” with the abomination “die Lehrer*innen,” using the plural feminine form of the noun for teacher (die Lehrerin and die Lehrerinnen) but with an apostrophe between the root noun and the feminine suffix to placate so-called “non-binary” people. Rather than AfD Wähler, Plaar constantly refers to AfD supporters or AfD constituents as AfD Wähler*innen.

In terms of offering new content and fresh ideas, the book’s only substantive value was the added details of her family and her decision to break off all contact with her father in particular; it seems she has very sporadic contact with her mother. At less than 200 pages, the thin volume provides a family and personal history combined with her zealous advocacy for her decision to cut ties with her family. This account of the events that led to this decision are interspersed with various political diatribes that could not be any more unoriginal or uninteresting. That portion of the text not dealing with her family reads like a barely coherent mish-mash of leftist catechisms. Although there are a few, occasional Schachtelsätze[4]This term means box sentences, and refers to a unique propensity in the German language that allows for very complex syntax and sentence structures, where one idea is nested into another, similar to Russian nesting dolls. Thomas Mann was famous (or infamous) for this, as are other German thinkers and writers. Some of these sentences are simply impossible to translate perfectly in English, requiring the translator to break a Schachtelsatz into two or more sentences, even though that one sentence is perfectly acceptable in the German, although at times challenging nonetheless. that require close attention by non-native and probably native German speakers alike, the greatest peril faced by this reader was the challenge to stay focused when reading passages that were nothing other than naked boilerplate of leftist dogma that has been encountered countless times before. This includes several pages devoted to Kimberlé Crenshaw’s cursed diatribe about intersectionality as well as other leftist tenets that have been repeated and regurgitated countless times before, not unlike religious catechisms. The text is also riddled with tired, cliched jargon that has become all too predictable, including the unironic, sincere use of the term “fact checks,” “toxic masculinity,” so-called “white privilege”—in sacred Germany!—and a limited selection of other buzzwords and slogans revealing how very shallow the NPC script runs.

As discussed below, various redundancies, the constant, unremittent use of a few select adjectives and other buzzwords, as well as the dearth of original, novel content inform more discerning readers that this book deal was not founded on any objective appraisal based on quality of writing or interesting, unique insight, but simply having a minimum, baseline number of followers on TikTok or other social media platforms. Such are the literary standards of major publishing houses in the modern world, if one can call them standards at all.

It is of particular note that Plaar commits a fair amount of verbiage condemning so-called “white privilege,” including expressions of naked contempt for her father for having such supposed privilege. Reading leftist claptrap droning on—and on—about so-called “white privilege,” so painfully familiar in modern American discourse, is particularly grating in the German language and in the context of the plight of modern Germany precisely because Germans, actual Germans and other actual Europeans who have a right to live there and travel there, are categorically white by definition. The “privileges” enjoyed by her father, other Germans, and even herself, for which she also expends significant verbiage to apologize for, are nothing less than belonging to a homogenous, European society and enjoying the benefits and advantages of the social contract such society is supposed to provide for those who rightfully belong to that society and polity. Such tirades are revealed to be particularly absurd and offensive when one imagines the same vitriol applied to Japanese individuals enjoying Japanese or “Asian privilege” and other advantages of belonging to Japanese society, or “Jewish privilege” in the context of Israeli Jews belonging to Israeli society.

Increasing Acrimony With Her Family and the Decision to Break Off All Contact

Interspersed with these and other boilerplate leftist talking-points is a narrative that sets forth both the events that preceded and then compelled (in her mind) her decision to cut off contact from her family and her justification for doing so. Perhaps the most repugnant facet of this book is the raw, naked contempt she holds for her father. She does not even refer to him as her father, but uses the German word “Erzeuger” to refer to the unfortunate patriarch. As is often the case with many German words and expressions, the word defies easy translation. In relation to animal husbandry, the term can be translated as “breeder.” In matters of law and in other contexts where a man impregnated a woman who gave birth to a child but was never active in a role as a father, the term can also be translated as “biological father.” However, the term “biological father” would make little sense to English readers in Plaar’s particular instance given the absence of any context in which it is normally applied. Given that Leonie was never adopted or raised by a step-father, use of the term “Erzeuger” is therefore both strange and dehumanizing. It is of note she refers to her mother, grandmother, and late grandfather as such: Mutter, Oma, Opa. In the course of this text, she also refers to him as a “textbook example of frustrated facebook boomers,” a “complete asshole,” and an “old white man.”

The factual context underlying her strong political disagreements with her father and the rest of the Plaar family is fairly straightforward and could have been summarized in a medium-length essay. She attended the Universität Osnabrück with the original intention to major in law (the rough equivalent of law degrees are awarded at the undergraduate level in Germany). At some point she changed her mind and switched to history and gender studies. Predictably enough, this coincided with her abrupt political radicalization. During this time, she would visit family armed with “anti-racist” and “feminist” literature with the fool’s errand of trying to change their minds. She could not. Utterly uncompromising in her political convictions, she could not accept that her parents and grandparents supported the supposedly “far-right” AfD. Both her contempt for her family and her rigid, unwavering ideological zealotry even obliged her to start an argument at her family’s traditional German Christmas celebration[5]As an aside, this portion of the text was particularly outrageous. She describes a traditional German Christmas, replete with real candles on the Christmas tree and other markings of a traditional Christmas, but is dismissive of the chocolates and other accoutrements as kitschy. The argument started because others in attendance rightly asserted that migrant boats from Africa must be turned away, rather than taken ashore to Europe. This anecdote as with so many others proves Leonie Plaar hates not only her family but her people and her culture. What she describes as a “Scheißweihnachten” many rootless Amis yearn for, just as she takes for granted and spits on the intact family unit she was blessed with that those from a broken family, particularly those who suffered at the hands of criminally negligent and abusive single mothers, can only dream of., even though she was sure it would be the last such get together for her late grandfather. The continuing political disagreements only ratcheted up with increasing intensity, before finally coming to a head when she came to what would be her last visit with her family, armed with what she thought was a silver bullet, namely the question “what circumstances would oblige you to leave the AfD?”

Here there is an important discrepancy with what is set forth in the book and what she relays in the TINCON pr sensation alluded to earlier, as well as, in all likelihood, other appearances and statements concerning this subject. In the presentation in Cologne, which, of course, occurred before this book was published or even in the process of writing and revision, she claims that her father answered that “nothing” could persuade him to leave the AfD. The underlying reason as to why this would be unforgiveable is that her father would still not leave the party even if the AfD somehow transformed itself to an actual far-right, neo-Nazi party that condoned the Holocaust or took other positions that the party would never do both for practical political reasons and because such positions would render the party illegal in modern Germany still underfoot of her American conquerors. In the book, this line of “argumentation” was underpinned by the fantastical rhetorical question as to what her father’s reaction would be if Björn Höcke did a Nazi salute in the Bundestag.[6]It is of note that in the TINCON and most likely elsewhere, Plaar contends that AfD figures have done the Nazi salute.

Here however Plaar is either caught in a lie or suffers from an acute inability to keep her facts straight. In the book, she recounts this challenge but states that his original response was, after staring off in the distance and taking a deep breath, to simply say nothing. She then reiterated the same question in so many words and hysterical rhetorical questions with no basis in reality, and he simply stated that supporting the AfD is in his best financial interest. This is in direct contradiction of her earlier account at TINCON where she claims he said “nothing” would change his mind concerning the AfD.

It is of note that right-of-center outlets have discovered and commented on an equally if not more disconcerting inconsistency, namely that she claims to have been briefly a member of the AfD at different ages, both of which would have her, a woman born in 1992, as a member of the party before it was founded in February of 2013. In the book she claims she was 19, and in other public statements it was 18. As at least one German influencer has noted, it would be interesting if the AfD made a public statement certifying that she was never in fact a member.

It is also of note that Plaar identifies a different moment that obliged her, in her mind, to end her relationship with her father in particular. In the book, she recounts a disagreement concerning Covid policy and mandatory vaccinations as the final straw. In denouncing the naked overreach by the Bundresrepublik, her father is alleged to have invoked comparisons to the Holocaust, even alleged to have uttered the derisive comment “Impfung macht frei” (vaccinations will set you free), an allusion to the “Arbeit Macht Frei” sign at the gates of Auschwitz. For Leonie, this “crossed a red line” that could not be forgiven. In the TINCON presentation, she at first desginates the response to her question “What would oblige you to no longer support the AfD” as the reason for breaking off contact, before then explaining that maintaining a relationship with her father in particular would present a danger to her “queer, nonbinary, and BIPOC friends.” At the end before the question-and-answer session, she notes that he compared vaccination requirements with the Holocaust, but did not say this was what crossed the red line, as set forth in the book.[7]See excerpts from around 11:00-11:40, approximately 13:40 and 17:30, give or take 10-20 seconds each way.

Given what could most charitably be described as inconsistent statements at best, and at worst what some reasonably suspect to be outright lies, there is more than enough reason for critical readers to doubt he made such utterances at all. Even accepting this as fact, it smacks of obvious hyperbole, exaggerating for rhetorical effect legitimate fears of government overreach in Germany in relation to Covid measures and the vaccine mandates in particular.[8]In this TINCON presenation, she mentions discussions of microchips, vaccine requirements as a naked ploy to render persons infertile or reduce fertility. It should be stressed that Leonie Plaar is simply an unreliable narrator for all the reasons set forth in this essay. As has been stated, she has demonstrated a propensity to impute statements by some to all who are in agreement on other matters. Did her parents really suggest the vaccine carries microchips, or she is imputing utterances on Facebook groups and other outlets to anyone and everyone who suppports the AfD? Reading her account of events as she alleges to have taken place, this reader was not left with the impression that the father seriously believed the Bundesrepublik was going to round-up dissidents who resisted such Covid policies and put them in concentration camps, earmarked for extermination.

Consider yet another inconsistency. During the presentation in Cologne, she asks the audience if any in attendance were a “Papakind,” roughly meaning “daddy’s favorite.” In that presentation, she describes her relation with her father being special, and even recounted how in her childhood and adolescence he would regularly come up to her room before bedtime to discuss current events, how her day went, how his day went, and other matters. In the book however, she alleged that her deceased older brother, Gerrit, was the favorite, and that she received unequal or disparate treatment compared to her brother. She even takes umbrage with how he expressed grief when meeting her at the hospital upon news of his death for reasons that were mystifying to this author as well as at least one native German speaker who read the salient passage in question.

As an aside, in a concluding chapter, she divulges to the reader that there are other reasons besides the political and ideological differences that bolstered her decision to end contact with her father in particular. This should strike readers as the most underhanded of all. An author who decides to disparage her father with the intent to convince the reading public of the correctness of such a decision, having decided to make the matter public, should state all relevant contentions plainly and openly. This does not mean all details must be divulged, but this particular tactic is particularly low, even for Plaar. Note also such suggestions necessarily convey certain dark implications, that readers sympathetic to Plaar might infer such nebulous implications likely pertain to physical or sexual abuse or the like.

Another detail in an early chapter further invites skepticism, namely her account of what quickly disabused her supposed (and very brief) membership in the AfD. She claims a black woman “Ella” contacted her on Facebook to express her objections and concerns about AfD and how the party harms “marginalized” people and groups. Consider the possibility, likelihood even, that Ella is a lie and fabrication to draw on the rhetorical weight lefties afford the “progressive stack.” Plaar’s intentions could not be more transparent, namely to show deference to “marginalized” voices and how she as a “privileged, cisgender white woman” in Germany listens and defers to black and brown voices. However ridiculous and disdainful such rhetoric is, it carries significant currency in leftist circles.

The Regurgitation of Leftist Catechisms as Political Diatribe

As stated, the political diatribes are nothing less than a recitation of leftist catechisms, seemingly regurgitated verbatim, with no original thought or insight whatsoever. Reading these portions of the text nonetheless reveals several key attributes that characterize not just Plaar but many of her ilk. One of the most immediate propensities that jumps out at the reader is the constant repeating of certain adjectives to describe persons and entities she not only disagrees with but disdains, those figures being, aside from her poor father, the AfD, its supporters, and most immediately its key leaders. She constantly describes both the AfD and its supporters as “right-wing” or “far-right;” the German word is “rechtsextrem,” which literally translates as “right extreme.” “Rechtsradikal” is a similar adjective, but one she uses much less. So much of the prose is just utterly and appallingly redundant, simply stating over and over “The AfD is far-right” over and over again. At one point, after some variation of that sentence had already been uttered in some variation countless times before, she reiterates: “Once again—the AfD is a far-right party.” This not only reveals a defect in reasoning[9]This propensity to denounce something as “right-wing,” “far-right,” “neo-Nazi,” “racist, so on and so forth is a familiar one. The logical fallacy in this rhetorical strategy is that it presupposes whatever label is applied is categorically a bad thing. This is why in the leftist mind the discussion often begins and ends there. Unfortunately, the tactic has nonetheless been very effective, as many have indoctrinated so deeply as to have a Pavlovian response to the mere utterance of such buzzwords. and dearth in substance, it reveals her writing to suffer from some of the worst offenses against basic principles in writing and expository composition; first, avoid excessive redundancies and, second, avoid overuse of the same adjectives and other words over and over.

As do others in Germany’s left, she also denounces the AfD and its supporters as “misanthropic.” This is another instance where something is lost in translation, because the word “menschenfeindlich” denotes something more sinister in the German, as it literally means “hostile to humanity” or an “enemy to humanity.”[10]Such utterances are difficult to translate because it would be bizarre to hear or read a declaration in English that “The AfD (or Donald Trump, or this or that) is “misanthropic.” The most natural expression for the native English speaker might read something like “The politics of Donald Trump and other right-wingers is rooted in contempt for humanity.” But none of the sentences in question read anything like “Der Politik der AfD ist gegründet von der Menschenfeindlichkeit.” Nor would anyone repeat that same sentence countles times over in just a couple of chapters. This term is interspersed with the word menschenverachtend which also means misanthropic but can also mean inhumane, as it literally translates as “contemptuous of humanity.” These and other select adjectives are repeated as if uttered as a rote mantra or, as previously stated, catechism.

Of course, it is not at all the case that the AfD or other right-wing parties and movements, regardless of how moderate they are in fact, are actually misanthropic or contemptuous of humanity, at least not all of humanity. At the very least, AfD supporters and those who demand sensible immigration policy, protection of borders, as well as remigration are not contemptuous of all of humanity at all, as they love their nation and their people, and seek, desire, and demand policies that are conducive to the preservation and furtherance of their future posterity. Morrissey, former frontman of the Smiths, and others have noted how those who truly respect both humanity and diversity in humanity understand why European nation states must remain homogenous, that the multiracial vision of globalism seeks to destroy those differences. Leonie Plaar on the other hand is contemptuous of one segment of humanity, that is Germans in particular, first and foremost her own father, and Germans and white Europeans writ large, especially men.

The rhetorical or, for lack of a better term, literary ticks whereby she is compelled to recite the same adjective and other buzzwords countless times, over and over, is perhaps most evident in relation to Björn Höcke. With few very exceptions, she could not mention the name of this man without the seemingly obligatory preamble of “fascist” first, e.g. “Fascist Björn Höcke” or on rare occasion “the fascist Höcke.” “Der Fascist Björn Höcke” or some slight variation thereof was repeated over and over, as another mantra of the leftist hive mind.

An examination of this book as extended political diatribe also reveals other important propensities. Plaar, like so many other leftist swine of her ilk, never really refutes the contentions of her political enemies, namely her own family, in any given instance. Both in relation to the disastrous Covid policy and the supposed threat to “our democracy” she and others imagined the AfD to be, many of her supposed refutations are nothing other than naked appeal to authority. In relation to the concerns by her family and others concerning the Covid pandemic and the heavy-handed, destructive measures imposed in response to it, she simply cites that there is a “scientific consensus,” which in her mind ends and wins the argument.[11]The problems with such reasoning are well beyond the scope of this essay. In summary, as revealed in the meme featured in the text of this essay, various institutions, including organizations in healthcare and medicine have been subject to ideopolitical capture. Beyond that, consider a staple address to medical students on their first day, namely that one third to one fourth of what is taught is likely wrong, it is just unknwon at that time what is wrong. There are of course many other objections. Ostensibly this is also true in the minds of many readers who took up the volume for purposes very different than writing this summary and analysis. COVID policy however is not the only issue where she employs this specious rhetorical tactic. To conclude an exhaustive chapter attacking the AfD as a threat to democracy where she reiterates “rechtsextrem” countless times over, she concludes by noting how “experts warn” that the AfD is a threat to democracy. This reveals a particularly faulty line of “reasoning” that combines circular logic with a most specious appeal to authority; X is Y because X is Y and because “experts” warn that X is Y.

Another rhetorical propensity is to repeatedly describe both platform issues embraced by the AfD and its appointed leaders as well as grievances expressed by her estranged family members as nothing other than conspiracy theories. This is applied to topics on which reasonable minds can disagree, including the suggestion that the vaccine mandates are part of an intentional bid to accelerate and exacerbate white infertility (an assertion of which this author remains unconvinced, although given Plaar’s poor credibility one doubts her family members actually uttered such things) to the great ethnic and racial replacement that has overtaken Europe and the West, a phenomenon so corroborated by hard data as to be indisputable.

The key to understanding how thoroughly engrained her indoctrination is perhaps lies in the fourth chapter, “You Must Also Accept Different Opinions.” This chapter purports to address an objection raised by her grandmother in which the matriarch admonished the younger Plaar that she must learn to accept opinions that are different from her own. In this section, but in preceding and subsequent passages as well, Plaar describes what to her are various disagreeable contentions (no doubt at times consisting of straw-man arguments). Then, as rebuttal of this argument, Plaar simply asserts, with little to no analysis or factual basis, that the argument or facts asserted are simply not true. In a crucial excerpt of this pivotal chapter, she incredulously contends that a right to have an opinion is conditioned on being based on facts, with Plaar and her various political and ideological allies as the sole, exclusive arbiters of what is fact and what is not. Conversely, an opinion based on what she contends are counterfactual assessments are not opinions, but “false claims” (“falsche Behauptungen”). Time and time again she simply states that the claims asserted by her family and other ideological and political enemies of her insane, civilization-destroying worldview are just wrong—or rather that the factual matters underlying these claims are wrong—without proof or actual argumentation. Consider the claim that allowing biological men into female spaces harms women, a claim which has now been proven in many different countries and contexts that have succumbed however briefly to transgender nuttery and delusion. She simply writes “Spoiler—that’s not true.”[12]Note that as her prose is uniquely susceptible to Anglicisms as the German and other languages are beleaguered by the incursion of American influence, she used the English word spoiler, not a German equivalent. This one instance revealing the prose to be incredibly shoddy, reminiscent of Katanji Brown Jackson’s infamous “wait for it” passage in a dissenting opinion that was excorciated in ruthless fashion by Amy Coney Barrett.

A close reading of this portion of the text reveals that the author soon engages in the old switcheroo. Namely, at first she discounts or dismisses the assertions and arguments of her political enemies by simply declaring they have no factual basis or dismissing them as outright “lies.” As stated before, this is usually done either by that declaration alone or a summary appeal to some nebulous authority such as “scientific consensus” or “experts.” At the end of this diatribe constructed on such bizarre, faulty reasoning, she shifts from the blithe assertion that right-wing views lack a factual basis to declaring outright refusal to compromise on what she wrongly believes to be morally righteous positions on these issues:

Particularly in relation to personal discussions with AfD supporters… it is not a matter of difference of opinion, but rather moral values. Breaking off contact with my family arose not from difference of opinion, but rather that their assertions were not compatible with my comparatively strict moral system.

This is one of the very few considerations she gets right, namely that these irreconcilable differences do stem from moral convictions, even though she is utterly wrong about her moral convictions. In any case, this rare moment of insight should have dispensed with the ridiculous blather alleging there is no factual basis for right-wing reactionary views.

Her specious, faulty reasoning is revealed in many other facets as well. Her parents and other family members, quite correctly, expressed concerns about the danger migrant males pose to the female population of Germany and other countries. Plaar does not engage in any statistical analysis debunking such claims (such data does not exist). Her argument, if one can call it that, is that any sexual assault she ever experienced was at the hands of “white Germans,” ie actual Germans who have a natural blood right to live and reside in sacred Germany! This argument was tethered to a dubious claim that she was raped or sexually assaulted (vergewaltigt) at 17—skeptical readers rightly suspect it was simply a consensual sexual encounter she soon regretted thereafter, and certainly was nothing like the violent sexual assaults that have been perpetrated by migrant, black and brown males in Germany and elsewhere. She further claims that the problem of sexual violence against women “has nothing to do with migration, but rather toxic masculinity.” Then there is this bit of misandrist prattle, dripping with her abject contempt and disdain for men of her own people, as expressed to her father during one of their arguments:

Do you know how often I have been harassed or groped at parties by certain types of men? And each of them was a white German. Every time, when I turn around because there is a strange hand on my ass, stands some Markus or Stefan or Christian in a preppy polo and chinos who thinks I should take that as a compliment.

Here and elsewhere Plaar and others of her loathsome persuasion conflate simple groping or what are ultimately unsuccessful sexual advances at social functions with the sort of brutal, violent rape that have been afflicted on the native populations of Europe by racial imposters who simply must be expelled and expunged from the European continent. The “reasoning” could not be more faulty; Plaar incredulously asserts that because she and those in her circle have never been victimized by migrants or other imposters, and because all of her negative experiences have been at the hands of her German male counterparts, the concern is therefore, in her twisted, delusional mind, invalid.

She also disparages both her family members and AfD supporters by citing alleged death threats and rape threats and then impute these isolated statements in comments sections, direct messages, and the like as representative of her detractors not only collectively but to each and every detractor. Such utterances are of course probably more aptly described as wishes for harm than actual threats. If one were to use this logic, the entire constituency of the Democrat party in the United States would be condemned by similar imputation of unsavory comments about the assassination of Charlie Kirk or the attempted assassination attempts on President Trump’s life during the 2024 election. It is of note she used that rhetorical tactic specifically to denounce her family in her insistence that they stop supporting the AfD; some who claim to support the AfD have expressed a desire to see her raped or killed, so, in Leonie Plaar’s mind, failure to denounce the AfD is somehow tantamount to tacit approval of such comments. One of her outrageous tirades against her father is recounted as follows:

You at the very least know what this party wants. A party composed of a certain contingent of people and supported by a number of people that only want to see people like me but most definitely want to see me, you own daughter, die. I am referring to the number of hate comments and murder threats and desires to see me raped, that I regularly receive from AfD members and supporters and that I have presented to my father (Erzeuger) on a number of occasions.

He and similarly situated AfD supporters could of course similarly present lefties with the plethora of violent rhetoric from Antifa sorts and others directed at those who disagree with their deluded, insane worldview. Indeed, she recently expressed the assassination of Charlie Kirk in favorable terms, stating that while she will not explicitly condone his murder, she does not condemn it either, and that she certainly will not condemn those who do celebrate or condone his murder, most particularly “marginalized” peoples.

Screenshot of Leonie Plaar’s German language TikTok video stating that while she is not happy about Charlie Kirk’s assassination, she is not sad about it either, as she refuses to condemn those who condone or celebrate his death. This is tantamount to condoning to circumvent terms of service. It is also of note she did not post this on her more accessbile English language TikTok accouunt.

There are other passages in the text that are similarly if not equally confounding. Consider her blithe, even flippant response to the contention that banning the AfD would disenfranchise millions of German citizens who willfully and with full knowledge of the issues and each party’s platforms vote for the AfD; they are not disenfranchised from voting, she claims, because they can simply vote for one of the parties that has not been banned. None of these parties intend to do anything about the migrant crisis, The Great Replacement, or other problems that present existential threats to German and European society. In her mind, banning the AfD is in no way an incursion or restriction of the voting rights of those who rightly support the AfD; they can just continue to vote for parties who work towards everything they adamantly disagree with.

These and other considerations in the text, her various public appearances, and social media posts inform a particularly rigid, unwavering worldview that is indeed impervious to both compromise as well as reason. She even states as much in this salient quote:

There are many things on which I am ready to have a discussion—but that does not include questions as to whether certain groups or individuals have earned less human rights than others. For me there can be no compromise on such issues, and those who see otherwise have no place in my life.

The stated intention to discuss certain matters of disagreement should fool no one. Indeed, there is virtually nothing in contravention of leftist orthodoxy that does not, in their sordid worldview, challenge such fanciful notions about “human rights.” In this way, Leonie Plaar’s worldview is revealed to be an absolutist one where everything is all or nothing, all the time. It is not only childish, but unrealistic, particularly in relation to familial relations from different, older generations.[13]It should be noted many on the hard-right suffer from similar tendencies, most notably Devon Stack who has stated anyone who supports Trump, even from a realistic assessment based on Realpolitik, should kill themselves, that they are useless, so on and so forth. Indeed, for Leonie it was not enough that her family was somewhat accepting of her professed bisexuality at 15, and later “coming-out” as lesbian at 23;[14]Various factors place Plaar’s professed lesbianism in doubt, including that she had a boyfriend at University after the age where she supposedly came out. This author has always asserted that homosexuality is not the innate condition LQBTQ-Yuck insists, particularly for women. Female sexuality is far more fluid, and susceptible to bisexuality and lesbianism. This is evinced by the recurreing pattern where women will have heterosexual relationships for years and decades, before “switching sides,” including prominent celebrities. She has also identified herself as lesbian to bisexual. In all likelihood, her lesibianism is a choice predicated on cultural environmental externalities as well as an intense misandry that only intensified with radical leftist indoctrination. that detail is of course in seeming contradiction with the image featured below, certifying she had a boyfriend at 27. The mere suggestion or hope that she marries a man and has children—a proposition on which the continued propagation and furtherance of any people’s future posterity necessarily depends on—was enough to incur her ire. Nor was it enough that her grandmother in particular was accepting of her lesbian proclivities; despite her grandmother’s expressions of acceptance of her current lesbian partner, Plaar was outraged nonetheless because Oma Plaar insisted that marriage is, by definition, between a man and a woman. The same applies to transgender nuttery, the migrant crisis and The Great Replacement, and any off-the-shelf platform position embraced by the left in Europe as well as the United States.

A recent Instragram post certifiying she had a boyfriend at 27, after the supposed coming-out at 23. The book reveals that he was prone to punching furniture and walls. Perhaps this was simply a result from the woman he fell in love with becoming increasingly insufferable, together with any number of severe provocations that would try the patience of a saint.

This rigid, unwavering worldview is further compounded by the particularly audacious manner in which she accuses her detractors from being “brain-washed,” “indoctrinated,” or how she accuses her estranged family members of being in an “echo chamber.” Some readers will doubtlessly chuckle at her naked assertion that she, unlike her detractors, has the unique ability to “think for myself” when her writings reveal no unique insight, no original thought, and are nothing less than the abject regurgitation of leftist talking points and catechisms, recited almost as if from rote memorization.

Lessons to Learn: A Vision Going Forward

As set forth in “On the Indoctrination of Frau Löwenherz,” Leonie Plaar is a woman who has succumbed to the indoctrination and programming of a subversive, hostile cultural milieu. The hyper-Germanic handle Frau Löwenherz could just as well refer to (depending on one’s point of view) a heroine or villainess in Nazi exploitation schlock. That moniker as well as other quirks peculiar to the national German character are emblematic of how her very German phenotype and essence has been weaponized against itself. Central to this is the certitude she will never be a mother or wife as those terms are properly understood. She writes about working for a “diverse, open” society, but astute readers understand that a Germany that is increasingly less German will soon cease to be Germany at all. This of course is her intention and the intention of those persons and entities that are in league with her and her kind. This much should be obvious. Less obvious to at least some readers are other important considerations.

First, despite the ridiculous sentiments oft expressed by mainstream conservative types—the sorts who are idolators of the American flag and listen to “Proud to Be An America” by Lee Greenwood on heavy rotation—this is not the doing of German society, but a vanquished and conquered German society that has been at the direction and control of the United States in particular for over 80 years. Leonie Plaar and other Germans determined to bring about the abnegation and destruction of her people and her race are the natural and inevitable corollary of post-war German society as dictated and crafted by the allied victors, replete with the unrelenting infusion of American Unkultur as well as the war guilt complex that was designed and instigated through manipulation and reform of the German education system in particular. The German war guilt complex, the slanted news coverage of “neo Nazi” attacks on alien imposters, even the phenomenon of Gender Studies that she embraced in college in sync with her radicalization are all cultural phenomena that are installed by or traced to American elements. Otherwise well-intentioned Americans who behold deluded Germans and other Europeans like Leonie Plaar with disbelief, disgust, and contempt should—and must—look no further than their own country to ascertain the true culprits behind this existential threat to German society in particular and European civilization and posterity more broadly.

A second consideration is in equal contravention to mainstream conservative platitudes: that religion and family alone are enough to shelter and inoculate the family and the individual from the subversive elements of modern culture. Both this book and past and more current presentations reveal Plaar’s parents to be good, loving parents. Her father may have inherited a family business, a matter for which his ungrateful daughter takes every opportunity to express contempt and derision. But even in Europe, the success of such a small business requires something well above a standard 40-hour work week. It is also of note that in the TINCON presentation mentioned above, she recounts memories from childhood and early adolescence where he would visit with her before bedtime to discuss current events and matters of the day.

An image of the Plaar family business before the patriarch sold it to Rottler, a German chain specializng in eyewear, hearing aids, jewelry, and the like.

Some might suggest that this is somehow the fault of the Plaar family for “allowing” her to go to university at all. Even in the United States, parents cannot prevent their adult children from attending university or college. They can refuse to pay tuition, but this will likely alienate the children further.[15]It should be noted here that her father threatened to do this on the heels of a particularly acrimonious argument. This was never done, and indeed her mother called Leonie to inform her that she will not allow her daughter to fall in destitution or economic emergency. In Germany and much of Europe, college tuition is paid for, as it should be in a collegiate system that is both selective and academically rigorous, with the family helping on incidentals. It is of course of note she originally intended to major in law (once again, a law degree is equivalent to a four-year degree there) and then, exposed to subversive elements that have overtaken universities both in Europe and particularly the United States, decided to change to history and “gender studies.” The notion of ceding elite institutions further to the left is also part of what has created this crisis in culture, as culture emanates from universities and other cultural institutions.

In the TINCON presentation and elsewhere, Plaar cites going to youth groups as an influence. Such youth groups, which have been an institution in German society for over a century, have been subverted. Now parents and other concerned citizens may be on notice, but even then it is a dubious proposition to attempt to forbid attendance and membership if all of one’s peers belong to these youth groups. Nothing will prompt an adolescent or young adult to rebel and resent parents more than measures that isolate such individuals from their peers during those critical, formative years.

Contrary to naked insistence that “family and religion” alone are the answer, something must be done about the culture and about the universities in particular. Aside from the experiences recounted at the Universität Osnabrück she references Sex and the City in her adolescence, particularly to her “coming out” as bisexual at this time, as she cites the American television series as one of the positive portrayals of female sexual bisexuality she recalls from her youth. Should fifteen years old watch Sex and the City? No, nor should anyone, particularly not women. However, the proposition that parents must be obliged to undertake the utterly impossible task of policing, censoring, and prohibiting each and every instance of American Unkultur in present day Germany or modern society is laughable. Similar considerations apply to rap music for the past 30 to 35 years. A parent would have to chain a daughter to the basement, prohibit all access to the Internet and mass media to ensure, with absolute, mathematical certitude, that a young lady does not take a liking to that insidious, loathsome genre of “music” favored by many of her peers. That such a preposterous proposal is so patently absurd proves that the only prospect for long-term success is addressing culture not on an individual, micro level, but on a broad, societal scale.

For Germans, such considerations are compounded by the war guilt complex, something Leonie Plaar was particularly susceptible to. In the book she denounces any attempt by the AfD or others to reform or regulate this pathology that has become part of Germany’s national character (hopefully not permanently so). She even citesboth heavy-handed Holocaust education as well as news reports of “neo-Nazi” attacks on alien migrants particularly in former East Germany as particularly influential. Such influences are of course precisely as intended by the sitting German education system, increasingly Americanized modern West German mass-media culture, and most importantly of all, as intended by Germany’s erstwhile American occupiers.

For Germany in particular, this realization implores several other, important considerations. First and foremost, a consensus demanding an end to American military occupation must be fostered among a critical mass of Germans. This in turn would allow for an even more pressing imperative, ending the seemingly inexorable, relentless American influence that infuses so many portents of American Unkultur into German and European society, infecting and poisoning the stream of European culture more broadly. End English language advertising, repel—either through social stigma or outright censorship—subversive, vulgar and distasteful “music,” from negrocentric and profane rap music to the gynocentric constellation of female pop icons that run the gamut from Madonna, to Katy Perry, to Taylor Swift and everyone and everything in between. Other instances of American cultural imperialism must also be expunged from German life, from McDonald’s and other purveyors of fast-food slop to Coca-Cola. This must be coupled—some way, somehow—with an attack on and recapture of the universities as well as other important and influential cultural institutions and centers of power. Just as readers can trace the verbatim catechisms and recitations of Plaar’s tiresome political diatribes to leftist indoctrination, such claptrap is revealed to be the very antithesis of individual thought as that term is properly understood. Such indoctrination—such programming—is installed in the minds of countless numbers of individuals just like Leonie Plaar. Disrupt and end this incessant process of indoctrination and programming, and those portents of the incumbent, high German and European culture that sit in opposition to these nefarious influences will then quickly and forcefully retain dominance. Then, and only then, can everything necessary to save German and European civilization and posterity fall quickly in place, if only just in time.

As things are however, Germans who largely agree with Plaar, particularly young women, comprise a mainstream component of modern German and European society. In her instance, she is bolstered by half a million TikTok followers, is propped up in television appearances and, as readers of this essay have learned, even has a book deal with a mainstream publication, Penguin Deutschaland and Goldmann Verlag. The politics and views embraced by this contingent of German society are intent on the abnegation and abolition of both Germany and the German people: die nationale und völkische Abschaffung von Deutschland und des deutschen Volkes. They must be stopped at all costs, by any means necessary and available. That process begins by exposing and, at an intellectual and ideological level, understanding such elements: an effort towards which this summary and analysis hopefully offers a meaningful contribution.

Richard Parker speaks German with some degree of advanced proficiency to fluency, depending on how exacting one’s standards are, and has lived and worked there. Other articles and essays by Richard Parker are a and other writing with a unique, hard-right perspective!

Notes

[1] Archives of the respective pages in question have been provided so as not to contribute to page count. Those readers who wish to peruse her content can search for it more proactively on any search engine of choice.

[2] There is always reason to suspect follower count manipulation or fraud. Allegations that Ellen Woodburry, also known as Pizzacake Comics, has marshalled large numbers of bot accounts to inflate follower count are persuasive to many. Readers are encouraged to search on their own to discover certain conversations on certain unnamable platforms for more information.

[3] Loosely translated as gender neutral language. Before the rise of transgender nuttery and radical gender ideology, proponents implored the use of both masculine and feminine forms in the plural, eg die Lehrer und die Lehrerinnen. The left of course never stops, so it has devolved further into the use of the Gendersternchen.

[4] This term means box sentences, and refers to a unique propensity in the German language that allows for very complex syntax and sentence structures, where one idea is nested into another, similar to Russian nesting dolls. Thomas Mann was famous (or infamous) for this, as are other German thinkers and writers. Some of these sentences are simply impossible to translate perfectly in English, requiring the translator to break a Schachtelsatz into two or more sentences, even though that one sentence is perfectly acceptable in the German, although at times challenging nonetheless.

[5] As an aside, this portion of the text was particularly outrageous. She describes a traditional German Christmas, replete with real candles on the Christmas tree and other markings of a traditional Christmas, but is dismissive of the chocolates and other accoutrements as kitschy. The argument started because others in attendance rightly asserted that migrant boats from Africa must be turned away, rather than taken ashore to Europe. This anecdote as with so many others proves Leonie Plaar hates not only her family but her people and her culture. What she describes as a “Scheißweihnachten” many rootless Amis yearn for, just as she takes for granted and spits on the intact family unit she was blessed with that those from a broken family, particularly those who suffered at the hands of criminally negligent and abusive single mothers, can only dream of.

[6] It is of note that in the TINCON and most likely elsewhere, Plaar contends that AfD figures have done the Nazi salute.

[7] See excerpts from around 11:00-11:40, approximately 13:40 and 17:30, give or take 10-20 seconds each way.

[8] In this TINCON presenation, she mentions discussions of microchips, vaccine requirements as a naked ploy to render persons infertile or reduce fertility. It should be stressed that Leonie Plaar is simply an unreliable narrator for all the reasons set forth in this essay. As has been stated, she has demonstrated a propensity to impute statements by some to all who are in agreement on other matters. Did her parents really suggest the vaccine carries microchips, or she is imputing utterances on Facebook groups and other outlets to anyone and everyone who suppports the AfD?

[9] This propensity to denounce something as “right-wing,” “far-right,” “neo-Nazi,” “racist, so on and so forth is a familiar one. The logical fallacy in this rhetorical strategy is that it presupposes whatever label is applied is categorically a bad thing. This is why in the leftist mind the discussion often begins and ends there. Unfortunately, the tactic has nonetheless been very effective, as many have indoctrinated so deeply as to have a Pavlovian response to the mere utterance of such buzzwords.

[10] Such utterances are difficult to translate because it would be bizarre to hear or read a declaration in English that “The AfD (or Donald Trump, or this or that) is “misanthropic.” The most natural expression for the native English speaker might read something like “The politics of Donald Trump and other right-wingers is rooted in contempt for humanity.” But none of the sentences in question read anything like “Der Politik der AfD ist gegründet von der Menschenfeindlichkeit.” Nor would anyone repeat that same sentence countles times over in just a couple of chapters.

[11] The problems with such reasoning are well beyond the scope of this essay. In summary, as revealed in the meme featured in the text of this essay, various institutions, including organizations in healthcare and medicine have been subject to ideopolitical capture. Beyond that, consider a staple address to medical students on their first day, namely that one third to one fourth of what is taught is likely wrong, it is just unknwon at that time what is wrong. There are of course many other objections.

[12] Note that as her prose is uniquely susceptible to Anglicisms as the German and other languages are beleaguered by the incursion of American influence, she used the English word spoiler, not a German equivalent. This one instance revealing the prose to be incredibly shoddy, reminiscent of Katanji Brown Jackson’s infamous “wait for it” passage in a dissenting opinion that was excorciated in ruthless fashion by Amy Coney Barrett.

[13] It should be noted many on the hard-right suffer from similar tendencies, most notably Devon Stack who has stated anyone who supports Trump, even from a realistic assessment based on Realpolitik, should kill themselves, that they are useless, so on and so forth.

[14] Various factors place Plaar’s professed lesbianism in doubt, including that she had a boyfriend at University after the age where she supposedly came out. This author has always asserted that homosexuality is not the innate condition LQBTQ-Yuck insists, particularly for women. Female sexuality is far more fluid, and susceptible to bisexuality and lesbianism. This is evinced by the recurreing pattern where women will have heterosexual relationships for years and decades, before “switching sides,” including prominent celebrities. She has also identified herself as lesbian to bisexual. In all likelihood, her lesibianism is a choice predicated on cultural environmental externalities as well as an intense misandry that only intensified with radical leftist indoctrination.

[15] It should be noted here that her father threatened to do this on the heels of a particularly acrimonious argument. This was never done, and indeed her mother called Leonie to inform her that she will not allow her daughter to fall in destitution or economic emergency.

(Republished from The Occidental Observer by permission of author or representative)
 
Hide 83 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. I’m glad the author of this review read this book so that I don’t have to. I’m not sure such a book deserved such a detailed review. I do sympathize with this woman’s father–he remembers the baby and toddler that he loved and now must contend with the fact that his daughter has morphed into something unrecognizable.

  2. Leftist Indoctrination

    More like Commie Brainwashing

    Typical mindless white commie vermin brainwashed by ZWOG into becoming a degenerate anti-white antifa nutjob. Only the brainless can be brainwashed. Your white population in every western nation can basically be divided into two segments. One half are believers in Commie Jesus & the other half are followers of Commie Marx. Both are Jews by the way. Not much hope for ‘white humanity’ as long as that continues.

    • Agree: Zard
    • Replies: @Guest Perfect
    , @anonymous
  3. Henry Morganthau Jr’s “Carthaginian peace” is complete. “Germany 2025” bears no resemblance to pre-WW2 Germany. The post-War occupation and the saturation of communist ideology washed down with the cocktail of unrelenting guilt for being German has done to Germany what is currently in progress here in the U.S. Set your eyes on the hideous visage of Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, (https://media-cldnry.s-nbcnews.com/image/upload/t_fit-1000w,f_auto,q_auto:best/rockcms/2024-06/240627-ketanji-brown-jackson-mn-1100-b9c474.jpg) confirmed by members of both parties, to grasp the depths of the betrayal of our people.

    • Replies: @Che Guava
    , @Pythas
    , @JM
  4. Such tirades are revealed to be particularly absurd and offensive when one imagines the same vitriol applied to Japanese individuals enjoying Japanese or “Asian privilege” and other advantages of belonging to Japanese society, or “Jewish privilege” in the context of Israeli Jews belonging to Israeli society.

    This is a great idea. So wonderful, it distracts much from the rest of this review:

    For example, Chinese have the most Asian privilege of all. Being among the blue-eyed and blond-haired fairest race, I myself should be entitled to all kinds of DEI in China, and they should be cracking the whip on their own backs and making every effort to make it up to me the Asian privilege they experience and that I lack. Where I am from, we have never even heard of a high speed rail, nor half the things their Asian privilege entitles them to.

    Thus among all non-white countries we should be rightfully treated as the Herrenvolk we are, and offered jobs, entitlements, reparations, etc. This cannot make up for the colonialism experienced by white countries annihilated and displaced by foreign races of people similarly to what happened to the original inhabitants of the Americas, but it sounds like at least the minimum that should be done to compensate.

    If some kind of glitch in the Matrix were to somehow make me a billionaire—or just a millionaire, since Jews have perfected ways to make money out of money and so that basically makes you one by default if you aren’t as retarded as most of them and have a white cranially Neanderthal-sized brain—then I ought thank kindly this author Richard Parker, for I now know what my great project would be: to be the Nazi George Soros of white DEI in the Global South!

    if Hitler were here today, he would understand the best way you could ever hope to destroy the Jews and in particular Israel would be to teach their race about anti-racism and how diversity is their strength. Actually, I remember seeing some animated skit about this a decade or so ago on the Jewtube, about Hitler returning and deciding he is a liberal and running for Israel Prime Minister with precisely that goal. But I have not ever been able to find it again since, though I wish I could.

  5. Does the fact that footnotes 1 to 15 are actual links to the author’s blog, instead of being readily available at the bottom of this article, constitute a conscious effort to increment internet traffic to the author’s blog?
    For the record, I haven’t baited

  6. This article, like all articles about German culture, is difficult to read. While this article was well written, the nature of the bent and broken German psychology is difficult for an American to understand. The Germans are the subject of the world’s largest and longest psychological operation. They and the rest of the world unwittingly participate in the facade of post-war consensus. The truth shall set them free if they ever accept it. I fear they will be the last to recognize the truth about history and their actual part in it. Worldwide we have beautiful young women barren by choice, young boys being converted to young girls by their parents, peaceful races being systematically infiltrated and mixed with statistically violent, unintelligent, and murderous peoples… But at least we’re not speaking German…

  7. Instead of picking on this kind of dumb mouthpiece, you should go after her handlers.

    • Agree: Dr. Krieger
    • Replies: @Verymuchalive
  8. The Germans are the subject of the world’s largest and longest psychological operation.

    This is one of the most frequent Dissident Right canards. According to Paul Gottfried (the ethnic Bolshevik who created and named the “alt-right”) post WWII Germans were subjected to Allied brainwashing, producing the sad creatures we see today.

    Actually, though, it was simply a switch-out of one software program for another, leaving the hardware and operating system intact.

    From the Prussian Reich to the Third Reich to the Federal Republic, the German remains the same: conformist, totalitarian, and a willing slave. (As Nietzsche pointed out 150 years ago).

    All that has changed are the ideologies, which shows the meaninglessness of ideologies.

  9. @James J. O'Meara

    As opposed to such free-thinking specimens as the blarney-Irishman, the deluded Frenchman, the useless-gobshite English, the inane, motormouthed Spaniard, the cowardly, blustering Italian bravo or, god-forbid, a Pole and his ‘muh Katyn massacre’? Basically, en masse, everyone is fucking retarded. But far worst of all is the modern Scot – his Braveheart pretensions masking his craven bootlicking authoritarianism, cowardly servility and utter cultural trashiness.

    • Agree: Dr. Krieger, Poupon Marx
    • Replies: @Badger Down
  10. flyingcow says: • Website

    “Clowns to the right of me, clowns to the left of me….”
    Germany IS a perfect storm of clowns, all of them jammed into a clown car going over the precipice…

  11. She may be a snotty little twat but her kind are not unprecedented. 100 years ago she would have been right at home in the Weimar Republic. Maybe this is something the Germans have to go through once a century.

  12. Yet another clueless female who is empowering people who, once they get enough power, will treat all women as second-class citizens.

    She wants an open and diverse society, which might be all right if it were stipulated that everyone had to accept German values, but she doesn’t say that, so it will be diverse for a while, until the Islamo-fascists take over, and everyone will be forced to be Muslim. For example, in Britain recently a woman walking her dog was told to stop because it was upsetting her Muslim neighbors. That’s just a small taste of what is to come for the West.

    Here are some random thoughts on other things:

    1. If the father were to write a book in response, would the publisher publish it? One suspects not. Of course, if the situation were to be reversed, every leftist would be screaming in protest.

    2. I don’t think it’s fair to blame Germany’s current cultural environment on America. Sure, they have borrowed things from us, like McDonald’s, but they have also avoided borrowing things, like America’s team sports. They took what they liked. And we Americans have not only American fast food, but Mexican (Taco Bell), Italian (Little Caesar’s), and even Chinese (Panda Express and others). I’d welcome a German fast food restaurant.

    3. In addition, while everyone at the Unz Review seems to think that Europeans are nothing but puppets of America, the disdain that Europeans feel for us Americans suggests otherwise. We are nothing but cowboys in their eyes.

    4. My impression is that the entire Western world engaged in the cultural revolution of the 1960s that has led us to produce people like this woman. I don’t know that one can single out America as the source of it. And even if one could, it would be American leftism, or (((leftism))). Whatever the source, we in the West are now overwhelmed by what I call our era’s Prime Moral Imperative, which is that we must accept the Other. The Other can be many things, but in this instance it means anyone who is not ethnically a white Westerner. It sprang from the Holocaust, Western imperialism, Jim Crow here in America, etc. But mostly it sprang from people who insist that we must be critical of society, but who are never critical of themselves. And even if it leads to the destruction of the West, which includes good things like the development of medicine over the last few centuries, that doesn’t matter. We still must adhere to that imperative.

  13. @Mr. Crowley

    Didn’t Hitler say that in a few decades the US would be no threat to anyone as half of population will be negrified and the other half judiasized? Turns out he was more right than he knew.
    So sad to read this review. Sounds like the White women in the US. Another decade of the same way things are going and she will pray and wish for White men to return and their ways.
    I wish she could be sent to a nation that has zero White men and only nonWhites are in charge. She would change her tune quickly.
    She has no idea of the differences in culture and beliefs between White men and nonWhite men.
    Poor dear. She has to learn the hard way. I hope she survives it, sort of.

  14. @anonymous123asdbd

    https://odysee.com/@whiterabbitradio:9/AntiRacist-Hitler:3

    Oh you mean this vid? Yes I love it.
    I think this is hilarious. I have shared the link.

    ENJOY!!! Antiracist Hitler.

    • Thanks: Badger Down
  15. anonymous[291] • Disclaimer says:

    What country is what it was in 1930? Technology, media, and the rise to mass affluence in the Western world have changed society beyond recognition. If Weimar democracy had lasted, would Germany be so different from what it is today? If the Kaiser’s Germany had been able to survive, would it be so different now than monarchical Britain, Holland, or Sweden? Spain was able to “stop the clock” of societal evolution for 40 years, but where is it now? Same thing with Ireland.

    The Kaiser’s Germany wasn’t smart enough or flexible enough to survive. Same thing with Hitler’s monstrous Germany. Would a German victory in the Second World War have “preserved” some older Germany into the 21st century? What would Germany look like now if Hitler had won? Who can say what would have remained after 70-80 years? Would it eventually yield to a less tyrannical regime? Or would it be slavery and the boot stamping on the human face forever? Sympathizers ignore the revolutionary nature of the Nazi regime. Also the enticements and effects of consumerism and mass affluence. Would Germans resettled as slavemasters in the East remain brutalized conquerors? Or would they eventually get tired of the “healthy” agrarian life and long for the “decadent” cities?

    • Replies: @Lackadaisical Reader
  16. @John Pepple

    I don’t think it’s fair to blame Germany’s current cultural environment on America. Sure, they have borrowed things from us, like McDonald’s, but they have also avoided borrowing things, like America’s team sports. They took what they liked. And we Americans have not only American fast food, but Mexican (Taco Bell), Italian (Little Caesar’s), and even Chinese (Panda Express and others). I’d welcome a German fast food restaurant.

    It’s the idea of fast food franchises in itself that is seen as culturally American. It doesn’t matter the flavour of food offered.
    In Europe you’d grab a sandwich from a street stand, or eat pastries in a a bar or cafe. That would be the equivalent of the notion you have of fast food.
    The big chain commercialisation, the idea that any aspect of life can be squeezed for monetisation and presented wrapped in a capitalistic package (the McDonald chain) is what is perceived as dehumanising Americanization.
    Mind that it is not globalisation, it’s Americanization. Nothing like that would have sprung from any country in Europe.

    My impression is that the entire Western world engaged in the cultural revolution of the 1960s that has led us to produce people like this woman. I don’t know that one can single out America as the source of it.

    They would have never been able to enact a “cultural revolution” starting in Europe because, before the war and the consequent American occupation, a takeover bid of press, radio and university similar to the one they effected in America would have been certainly noticed in ethnically homogenous states, comprising of a local elite jealous of its prerogatives.

  17. @John Pepple

    She wants an open and diverse society, which might be all right if it were stipulated that everyone had to accept German values,

    NO–this is because race and ethnicity are an essential element of culture and identity. And no people can really assimilate unless closely related racially and ethnically. This is a key, essential concept, and it is the failure to understand or recognize this that has brought so many of our troubles.
    The essay “The Inherent Right of Race, Blood, and Soil” expounds on this.
    https://theravenscall.substack.com/p/the-inherent-right-of-race-blood

    • Thanks: Guest Perfect
  18. @anonymous

    What country is what it was in 1930? Technology, media, and the rise to mass affluence in the Western world have changed society beyond recognition. If Weimar democracy had lasted, would Germany be so different from what it is today?

    I fear this is the new establishment talking point to counter the alt-Right meme “at least we are not speaking German” if asked if Hitler had won the war.

    I read the same faulty reasoning over and over, and only lately

    • Replies: @anon
  19. The most interesting thing is that if there weren’t so many idiotic white people, this prostitute wouldn’t be influential.

    • Replies: @anonymous
  20. Curle says:
    @Diversity Heretic

    And he likely paid the college tuition bringing it about.

  21. Has she adopted any African kids yet?

    • Replies: @Tigerlily
  22. @anonymous123asdbd

    “Jewish privilege” in the context of Israeli Jews belonging to Israeli society.

    No, that is very different from the other examples. It may be assumed that Germans and Japanese people “belong there”. The “is”, however, are an alien nation that descended upon Palestine with Great Vengeance. Before Palestine was murdered and stolen, “Israel” meant Jews in general, the nation of Jews. So, yes, Jewi Jews belong to Jewi society, but calling Palestine “israel” is unacceptable.

  23. Anon[100] • Disclaimer says:

    Anyone interested can go to the AFD website and examine the AFD party platform. Its nothing dramatic. The specific platform points are fairly run of the mill European Christian-Democrat points from, say, the 1980s.

    Note, the AFD is also well within German establishment consensus on supporting the Likud gov’t in Israel.

    BTW – The head of the AFD is a lesbian married to a Sri Lanken. 🤣

    Its utterly confusing why the German Establishment is in hysterics regarding the AFD.

  24. Americans don’t really get Germany.

    First of all, there exists a tendency on the dissident right to see Germans as some kind of pure root race. False: Germany has always been an artificial construct and plantation/factory colony. The German/Prussian nation was created as an experiment in mind control and mass enslavement through unnatural discipline. Anyone who has lived there knows what I mean. Germans, whether on the right or the left, are robot people with hypertrophied left brains and withered right brains. They are all lost, and they will forever be lost. All of their neighbors correctly hate them. The author is right to mock viciously the braindead left-wing feminist discourse parroted by this horrible Plaar woman. Go walk around Hamburg and you’ll see hundreds of women who look and talk exactly like this. It’s so depressing. Where the author goes wrong is in implying that the AfD is better. Germans are dead inside, an absolutely lost race, and this is visible on the right as well as the left. The AfD is very obviously an arm of Israel. It is run by a lesbian who lives in Switzerland with her brown, adopted, possible tranny lover. This is pure elite mockery, just as Nazism was a huge lie and mockery of the German people. Right-wing Germans were correct about Covid and vaccination, but other than that, their dream is a sterile society in which everyone works constantly and everything follows strict rules. This is a total negation of everything that makes life worth living. The only correct opinion, from my point of view, is that Germans in both left- and right-wing declensions are a danger to civilization and have correctly been recognized as such by everyone who has had to deal with them. I personally welcome the browning of the German nation, because there seems to be a connection between the blonde hair, blue eyes, and plain milkmaid face of Plaar and this weird context blindness that leads her as well as her father to fall for different versions of Jewish mind control.

    • LOL: Gvaltar
    • Replies: @Poupon Marx
  25. Of course one photo shows her wearing her corporate/subcultural affiliation: “Levi’s”

  26. Boulder says:

    “Impfung macht frei!” – thats a good one!
    The youth of today are so easily offended.
    Why? They are insecure. Neither Christian or leftists, they oscillate between influencers. The Gramsci USA/European school-system made this zombie-variant!

  27. Miro23 says:

    As stated, the political diatribes are nothing less than a recitation of leftist catechisms, seemingly regurgitated verbatim, with no original thought or insight whatsoever.

    Nothing new here. It’s dogma – catechism. Simply indicating compliance with authority. The Soviet Union operated along identical lines with their stock of compulsory Right Think catch phrases.

    “Right think” is a phrase often associated with Orwellian thought control, particularly from his novel Nineteen Eighty-Four, where it refers to a system where independent thought is punished and the Party’s doctrine is the only acceptable view. The term is used to describe how an authoritarian state enforces conformity by manipulating language and controlling information to limit what citizens can even consider thinking, using concepts like “doublethink” to maintain power.
    Google

    Conclusion that Leonie Plaar is simply showing brainless fealty to the Power in the West (post WW2 Zio Imperialism*) by repeating Zio Imperialist Right Think phrases making her the perfect apparatchik.

    * There’s a great exposition of the religion of The Good War on this link: https://twitter.com/ccrowley100/status/1980083948240716274

    • Replies: @Kingsmeg
  28. Che Guava says:
    @Stephen Paul Foster

    The erectus is strong in that one!

    She clearly shows a vestigial muzzle.

  29. chris says:
    @Diversity Heretic

    I’m not sure such a book deserved such a detailed review.

    Yeah, quite a lot of pearls on a fanatical and retarded swine neck-deep in, and slinging shit on everything.

  30. Gbyut says:

    Germans were better people under Hitler.

    The reason Germans are now a failure is Germany lost the war. The ultimate power that defeated you wants you ruined just like Ameleks or Palestinians. This power will never forgive Germany and holds a Semitic vengeance against you — that shall never end.

  31. @Anon

    Anyone interested can go to the AFD website and examine the AFD party platform. Its nothing dramatic. The specific platform points are fairly run of the mill European Christian-Democrat points from, say, the 1980s.

    Any European nationalist/”far right” party led by a lesbian = controlled opposition

    it’s that easy

    • Replies: @Johan
  32. Leftism is a mental disease.

  33. anon[172] • Disclaimer says:
    @Lackadaisical Reader

    I fear … I read the same faulty reasoning over and over, and only lately

    You offer nothing but an expression of fear and a judgement of faulty reasoning and not even a single line of reasoning. The OP made a perfectly sensible observation that is obviously applicable regardless of one’s ideological position. Societies evolve and self designated “revolutionary regimes” create radical departures in culture. See Russia of USSR or Iran of IRI.

    All of these machinations, and here OP again has the correct culprits in sight (technology, mass media, and modern propaganda), are a given and adopted by all parties in the current (global) spectrum of what passes for political thought and organization. This seems to indicate that the ‘foam wear’ on top of these historic oceanic currents are just that: foam. The underlying dynamics remains exercise of power and control over the population.

    • Replies: @Lackadaisical Reader
  34. Government indoctrination has consequences.

  35. Anon[159] • Disclaimer says:

    In another twenty years you will find frau Leonie Plaar in Malindi, Kenya, like the other middle age German broads who shack up with those big black mambas, to her heart’s content…

  36. Stogumber says:

    Am a German, did not read the book, find the development as described rather encouraging. Basically, young (unmarried) women are the only demographic stratum in Germany which now turns to the fanatical left (Steve Sailer thinks that marriage makes them more centrist), mostly, I assume, b/o abortion.
    The leftist movement goes back to the 1960s, and even if the familiar conflicts were hard at that time, leftist students won over a lot of their relatives. Now they don”t gain much territory, but have to retreat into a “subculture”, where they find the assertion they need. And as you see, the less familiar support they get, the more fanatical they become (a vicious circle for them, a piece of luck for us).

  37. @Diversity Heretic

    Well, IF the story wasn’t my/our story (kind off), I would say something like ‘ who gives a rat ass about this brainwashed/indoctrinated biatch ‘. Unfortunately, this happened to us, immigrants from Eastern-Europe. When we arrived on the ‘ land of the free and home of the brave ‘ ( Aug. ’95 ), our daughters were 3 and a half, and almost 5 years old. Working as much as we could (both of us parents), for low wages – as most immigrants at the beginnings, we ended up with what I call ” children of the State “. The irony/sad part is that the daughter which spent more time in school ( and more money ) is the most brainwashed/indoctrinated of them. Having a Master Degree with summa cum laude at Loyola in Chicago, she considers herself ‘ the most educated in our families. I wouldn’t wish to any father/parent (even my enemies) to have a child like that. When we talk with her, it’s like talking with a robot, unable to learn/understand anything beyond of what is in its program. BTW, for all fresh immigrants out there: please spend as much time with your children and don’t let the State to interfere in their education (or as less as it is possible). Otherwise, you will end up with a variant/mutant/human drone on the ” LAND OF THE FEE AND HOME OF THE SLAVE “…And believe me/us: it’s a price which nobody wants to pay, because all your work, all your sacrifices, all your dreams are for NOTHING !!!

    • Thanks: chris
  38. When WW2 ended (a war promoted to hi-Heaven before and since by Jews)

    Germany was handed over to our fake Jewish friends to control, loot and destroy.

    The proof is in the pudding on this one.

    Regarding AFD

    AFD is controlled opposition

    How do I know this?

    Because AFD is all in on the Genocide in Gaza

    Simple logic.

    • Thanks: chris
    • Troll: Gvaltar
    • Replies: @Johan
  39. @James J. O'Meara

    From the Prussian Reich to the Third Reich to the Federal Republic, the German remains the same: conformist, totalitarian, and a willing slave. (As Nietzsche pointed out 150 years ago)

    And unaware of his Inner Life. I have exposited thousands of words here on this subject, approaching it from the observable, e.g., German Wehrmacht conduct during WWII [regular massacres of villages in France, Greece, Crete, Yugoslavia, Russia, for convenience and the refusal of the occupants to proffer their womenfolk for a “Fickenfest” or voluntarily turn over all food and sustenance to the Ubermensch-leaving the natives to starve-or not admitting to hiding a member of the resistance and giving up names and locations. This happened regularly. This gives the lie to the German excuse maker that the Nazis were only trying to right the wrongs of Versailles and reclaim historical German land. No, they were dead set on conquest, with the Roman Empire as their template and ideal. The driving force of the Nazi was the accumulation of slave labor, and the plundering of natural resources including agriculture.

    I have posted the German barbarities of innocent Greek peasants on the mainland and Crete.
    Germans whine about the cruelty of the Red Army entering Berlin and the subsequent occupation. This is ironic in light of the Wehrmacht, its slave labor [work to death for greater efficiency, to be replaced by new waves of conquest], and the fact the Soviet invasion produced war crimes and mass murder against ordinary people-just for the fun of it. A graphic of the massacre of Diatoma, a Greek village [posted here] described by a survivor, the Germans cutting babies out of pregnant women, and mutilating many of the bodies. A military tribunal, by senior officers later found no guilt or culpability of the Wehrmacht.

    • Replies: @NeverTrustaWizard
    , @JM
  40. So if this is correct one of the many feminist Woke Jokers is a barren pussy licking lesbian and represents leftist Jerkmans and the leader of the AFD is a barren childless pussy licking Lesbian with an adopted mulatto child represents right wing Jerkmans.
    WHAT?!!!😳

  41. anonymous[148] • Disclaimer says:
    @Mr. Crowley

    To Mr Crowley- well said. I am rereading a book by a Chinaman who watched his father dying from starvation in the 1960s. In that province/area over 300,000 were starved to death by Mao.

    In the Catholic schools in the 50s and 60s it was made clear to us just what Communists did.
    That is why I joined the Marine Corps in the 60s- I was just an eighteen year old boy.
    I doubt things have changed. People are spoiled and gullible and they believe the garbage preached to them in their schools that socialism/communism will be fair and wonderful.

  42. anonymous[148] • Disclaimer says:
    @Santoculto

    To Santoculto: why are people so easily misled? Why do people automatically believe the crap that the mainstream media feeds to them. I am past my mid 70s and see that my generation is composed of so many gullible, brainless fools.
    I have no problems telling spoiled, stupid boomers to take a strong laxative.

    • Agree: Santoculto
  43. @Diversity Heretic

    What if I told you the elite was all marxists regardless of their political party? In the US, we have been living in neo-communism for the past 25 years. The elite, both the neocons and and the neoliberals, have absolutely decimated the middle class. All while undermining Constitutional Law and Civil Rights. Add to that the rampant inflation and declining standards of living, the unsustainable debt bubble (and indentured servitude), the two tier health care system and education system. The vast taxpayer grift, nepotism, incompetence, and corruption. This is late stage capitalism. And Marx was right. The whole narrative that leftists are commies and Marxists is a sick joke.

    This is why conservatives aren’t the smartest. They have been voting against their best self interests for years and even now — they fail to see that the elitist neocons in power were authoritarian, incompetent, elitist corrupt communists all this time.

    Speaking of brainwashing and brainlessness. Have you checked to see if you have a brain? Or do you just argue in bad faith and peddle the same tired establishment disinformation.

    • Replies: @RestiveUs
  44. Johan says:
    @Lackadaisical Reader

    Any European nationalist/”far right” party led by a lesbian = controlled opposition

    Blockhead logic…

    What it means is that democracy produces degeneration of culture in all parties, including the right wing. And secondly: the real ‘pure’ so called ‘non degenerated’ nationalists have never existed but in the imagination of nationalist propagandists. Propaganda for duped blockheads.

    • Replies: @Lackadaisical Reader
  45. Johan says:
    @2stateshmoostate

    AFD is controlled opposition

    Jews have only a certain interest to attach themselves to the European right because on certain points leftism becomes a threat to their supremacist state of Israel and its crooked leaders.

  46. Tigerlily says:
    @Commentator Mike

    Lol..yeah she’s needs some cultural enrichment like that other stupid German bitch!

  47. @anon

    Can you mention a single, authoritative source which argues for your extremely deterministic view of history as shaped entirely by technological progress? With societal, cultural, political changes, wars, invasions etc having nothing but a ‘foaming’ effect over its main ‘oceanic current’?

    Obviously this is not just an absurd and shallow take your handlers have recently concocted, in order to suppress the “if Hitler had won the war, we wouldn’t have the societal decay we have now” stance (which is gaining a lot of traction) from going mainstream

  48. @Johan

    democracy produces degeneration of culture in all parties

    But without democracy, there is no party.
    Parties by definition cannot exist outside a democratic context

    • Replies: @Johan
  49. This gang of criminals wants more than to attach itself to this or that group

    They must control it

    The solution;

    Don’t let them

  50. @Anon

    I have committed much time and effort in research and study of contemporary Germany and its milieu, especially political and economic. My familiarity with Germans and Germany originates in my childhood in Central Texas where many ethnic Germans settled in the middle 1800s. Many of my friends and school mates where ethnically German and possessed a clear consciousness of their ethnicity. Next, in my profession as a seagoing Merchant Marine Engineer Officer, I made many trips to Germany. Many ships components – especially diesel engines – are German made, as were sub-systems. These are large, complex power plants with machinery in the Machinery Space and outside, e.g., on Deck.

    Occasionally, we would have German Field Technicians come aboard for engine overhauls. My interactions with Germans span years, both personally and professionally. On top of that, I spent 4 years in Central Europe – German speaking.

    [MORE]

    Understanding contemporary Germany involves history, a study of the National Character, a psychological framework of Analytic Psychology, and and an understanding and elucidation of German Collective Consciousness. These insights and analyses can be sourced from Jung, Heine, Wagner, Nietzsche, and other German prominent figures. All of them catalogue the unique German deficit of psychic health, hygiene, and self-awareness of the missing elements of a healthy Ego, Psyche, and the shortfall of INDIVIDUATION [Jung]. The average German avoids, runs from an internal examination of his essence and meaning in Collective Cosmic Consciousness. His religion is performance and efficiency, striving to be the best Material Determinist he can be, believing that to be the sum and total of Life’s striving and meaning.

    Now, the AfD is composted of high achievement members in various professions. Most are accomplished in the sciences, and disciplines requiring validation and production of the actual.

    Alice Weidel, Candidate for Chancellor and Co-Chair of the AfD:

    She studied economics and business administration at the University of Bayreuth and graduated as one of the best in the year in 2004.[3]
    After receiving her undergraduate degree, Weidel went to work for Goldman Sachs Asset Management from July 2005 to June 2006 as an analyst in Frankfurt.[4][5] In the late 2000s, she worked at the Bank of China, and lived for six years in China.
    An economist, mother, and onetime investment banker from a well-to-do family in West Germany, Alice Weidel does not fit the (media-driven) conventional image of a far-right party leader. She is highly educated, completing her dissertation in China on a scholarship from the Konrad Adenauer Foundation. She speaks fluent Mandarin and her wife is a Sri Lankan-Swiss filmmaker. Before politics, she worked at Allianz Global Investors and Goldman Sachs. These characteristics are somewhat surprising for someone in the AfD, and they only increase her notoriety: scores of media outlets wonder about the party “PR curiosity.” Media attention especially draws attention to the apparent incongruence between her identity and positions. Weidel has often been characterized as a woman of contradictions: she is both a lesbian and a proponent of “traditional values,” a German nationalist and a Swiss resident.

    Weidel’s position as one of the few women leaders in the AfD certainly contrasts with the overall tone of the party. Esther Lehnert, a right-wing populism expert from Berlin’s Alice Salomon University, describes the AfD as “steeped in chauvinism and sexism. It revels in this sort of leery sexist blokeism.” In this environment, Weidel has been able to stand out. Her cosmopolitan image and media savvy, complete with her tidy wardrobe and academic economics background, offer the party “an aura of bourgeois respectability that has strong appeal for middle-class voters beyond its traditional hard-right base,” according to Hans Vorländer, a political scientist at Dresden University of Technology. With this image, she rose quickly in the party ranks. In a bid to soften the AfD image and broaden its appeal, she became a leading candidate for the party in 2017. She was re-elected as co-leader of the party alongside Tino Chrupalla in July 2024 with 80 percent of the vote.

    Like the rest of the AfD, immigration is her defining political issue. Her criticism of immigration policies typically centers around a law-and-order society. She sees immigration, particularly immigrants from Arab or Muslim backgrounds, as intrinsically linked to crime. Weidel, alongside co-leader Chrupalla, called for “secure borders and a fortress Europe” following the May 2024 murder of a German police officer by an Afghan migrant. She told Bloomberg in December 2023 that if the AfD were to secure a position in a coalition government, their first agenda item would be to close German borders. She has also repeatedly called for illegal immigrants to be expelled from Germany. While opposition to immigration typically centers around presumed Arab or Muslim immigrants, Weidel has also pushed back against the 1.1 million Ukrainian refugees currently settled in Germany, vaguely commenting that they will have to return to Ukraine eventually.

    Many commentators suggest that Weidel is a key messenger for the AfD’s narrative that immigrants threaten the safety and well-being of German women and LGBTQ+ Germans, pointing to her use of terms like “headscarf girls” and “knife-wielding men” to describe migrants. This brand of far-right politics called homonationalism aligns “the politics of racism and nationalism” with feminist and gay rights discourse. While these elements are undoubtedly infused in her and the AfD’s politics, Weidel seems to generally downplay her own gender and sexual orientation in her political speech. She regularly dodges questions related to her identity and avoids making statements on the sexist and homophobic comments by other members of her party. In this way, Weidel perhaps takes after her self-proclaimed role model Margaret Thatcher.

    AfD platform: anti-immigration, deportations, revocation of citizenship for those immigrants granted same under unlawful conditions. Fiscally, more of an Austrian School economist. Favors withdraw from EU, return to Deutschmark. Opening of Nordstream. Re-establishing peer and intimate relationship with Russia. She is favored by both Putin and J. D. Vance. Slashing the State bureaucracy to a minimum. Expansion of civil liberties and protection of the individual. Google Alice Weiden and listen to her speeches and interviews. There is nothing to dislike. Her personal life, marriage to a woman, Sri Lankan is immaterial to me, and condemning a person on such trifle says more about the condemner than the condemned. Why would anybody care about such atmospherics, much less disqualify such a moral, brilliant, well balanced person??

    I have traveled my whole life. A good friend of mine and colleague was gay. I have lived in San Francisco and Guernville, in the West Santa Rosa Wine Country. Guernville is a traditional town with a lot of old families; country people. The influx of gays actually was welcomed because they brought in money, add to the esthetics of order and civil beauty. My neighbor from New York and I were joking that gay communities are unexcelled for quality of life. My town has strict codes of construction, pleasing civil order and beauty, no trash or grafitti, and negligible crime. It’s an oasis. Highest quality of life. And the people are very low key and very polite. It’s almost a 1950’s atmosphere. Respectful.

    I’m a hard data, evidence driven guy. Drivel repels me, as do emotional, irrational, groundless assertions and declarations. Weak-mindedness is a disease, to me. The convenience of “blending in” or becoming one of the “Lonely Crowd” [Riesman] or the subject of an Eric Hoffer thematic book [The Ordeal of Change]

    Hoffer: ““The individual’s most vital need is to prove his worth, and this usually means an insatiable hunger for action. For it is only the few who can acquire a sense of worth by developing and employing their capacities and talents. The majority prove their worth by keeping busy.”

    “And what of the masses in this intellectual’s paradise? They have found in the intellectual the most formidable taskmaster in history. No other regime has treated the masses so callously as raw material, to be experimented on and manipulated at will; and never before have so many lives been wasted so recklessly in war and in peace. On top of all this, the Communist intelligentsia has been using force in a wholly novel manner. The traditional master uses force to exact obedience and lets it go at that. Not so the intellectual. Because of his professed faith in the power of words and the irresistibility of the truths which supposedly shape his course, he cannot be satisfied with mere obedience. He tries to obtain by force a response that is usually obtained by the most perfect persuasion, and he uses Terror as a fearful instrument to extract faith and fervor from crushed souls.”

    Alice Weidel is an antidote. She’s an engineer’s, STEM, dream candidate. Since she jointed AfD in 2017, she and Tino Chapalla have led AfD to be the Number One Party [most popular] in Germany. She and AfD represent the Germany of better parts. Richard Wagner and Arthur Schopenhauer would have embraced her. For me, these Germans are the best of the lot, as their boundless curiosity lead them into study and interpretation of Orientalism.

    • Replies: @anon
  51. Johan says:

    but rather that their assertions were not compatible with my comparatively strict moral system

    Since morality is the domain of hypocrisy, surely they are fighting among each other who has the best system of values. It goes with the territory.

    The word strict could best be replaced with ‘rigidly imbecilic’.

  52. John1955 says:

    Wir haben jedes Vertrauen in die bisher der Welt angebotenen Ideologien, Staats- und Wirtschaftsformen restlos verloren. Wir verlangen ein System der wissenschaftlichen Planung, der Zweckmäßigkeit und der Vernunft. Alle Lebensbereiche dieser Erde beherrschen entweder Marionettenregierungen der internationalen Hochfinanz. Den Rest regieren feudale Bonzen, meist im Einklang mit religiösen Fanatikern.

    Wehrsportgruppe Hoffman, Manifest der Bewegung zur Verwirklichung der Rational Pragmatischen Sozial Hierarchie

    Hopefully when the Worldwide Financial Shit Show collapses WSG re-appears.

    https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wehrsportgruppe_Hoffmann

    Meanwhile, let’s pretend that AfD & black-clad brain dead cunts are doing something useful and/or meaningful 😁

    No offence meant. Brain Dead Cunt (2022) is a Greatest Song by Greatest Artist of All Time RastaPimp. Or so they say…

  53. anon[214] • Disclaimer says:
    @Poupon Marx

    Thanks for the deep background on Weidel. She seems very establishment and conventional. Investment Banking etc. etc

    Why is the German political elite so hysterical about her ?

    • Replies: @Poupon Marx
  54. Pythas says:
    @Stephen Paul Foster

    Henry Morganthau Jr’s! A dead kike with a German sir name. Carthagian peace! Yes shlomo I’ve studied Roman history. Of course the Romans ripped the jews assholes so wide open you could drive 25 Panzer divisions through it side-by-side. I’ve told many people on this site that these asiatic alien imposters have a deep general sub-conscious hated for the European races and ethnicities and the Germanic races in particular…But you people still don’t believe. Also its regrettable that the Germans, British, Danes, Dutch, French, Scots, Irish, Italians, Spanish, Belgians, Swedes, Austrians, Portuguese, Russians, and the smaller European countries where all of our ancestors living on this side of the Atlantic now originated from (besides the sub-saharan african negroes who were brought here by involuntary slavery sold by their own voodoo worshipping, witchdoctoring, mud-hut jungle shitting kind) have decided to commit Ethnic, Cultural, and Civilizational suicide by letting the yids flood their countries with niggers, arab sand niggers, hindus, moors, and khazari turkic or semite kikes. Demographic warfare anybody… The jew will never stop until they and that means 99% of them are purged out of the West, and that also includes most of these other aliens. And like I’ve said before its not like these aliens lack living space. Just look at a fuck’in atlas to see for yourselves…

  55. It should be easier for the native Irish than the native British population to overthrow the Deep State.

    GBR has economy of scale – if 1 area is kicking off, forces from other areas can provide backup. Whereas Ireland is smaller: all you’d need to do is marshall resources than co-ordinate affray in widely geographically dispersed towns.

  56. I’ve spent parts of last week looking at YouTube videos of “far-right” reporters venturing out amidst the protesting throng of insane Leftoids on “No Kings” day.

    Ahh, the irony. While holding up signs touting democracy and freedom and how Trump, the Fascist, is a threat to both, they, as soon as they realize that the microphone carrying guy is asking somewhat probing questions, surround and drown him out with clanging cowbells, bullhorns, whistles and gongs. They whisper furtively to the one who gives him her attention and then all shun him.

    So, looking at these people one can’t help but noticing that they bear a certain threadbare and beaten down, ridden hard and put away wet look. None look healthy.

    So here’s my takeaway.

    They, like the woman who is the subject of the above essay, are bored to tears of their boring lives. There is neither excitement nor danger in their daily lives. Protest provides both.

    Somewhat paradoxically, no animal can live without the threat of danger.

    Their Fathers and Grandfathers (and Mothers and Grandmothers) worked like mules to remove every obstacle from their paths. Every valley has been filled, every hill laid low. They spend virtually every hour of every day at hothouse temperature 72 degree Fahrenheit, 22 degree Centigrade. From house to car to office to grocery store to house again it’s the same unrelenting pattern. There is a minimum of inconvenience in their lives. No pain, no discomfort.

    Now contrast this with their peers, who deliberately go out of their way to expose themselves to chance and the possibility of danger. They hike and climb mountains, swim in lakes, bicycle long trips, kayak, canoe, sail, dive, snorkel, swim, bike and run competitively, take trips to exotic places, eat bizarre foods and on and on.

    The problem with the gal in the article above is that she lives in a world created by her hardworking and well-meaning ancestors which has eliminated any chance of her being scared shitless by unforeseen events. So she’s as bored as a zoo animal. And hates those who hold her captive.

    Her problems would be solved if she stepped out. Hey, go live in a tent in the National Forest for three months. Be hardy. Scrape by. Scrounge. Do something different. Stop blaming your parents for all that they have given you. If you don’t like it, if you can’t be grateful because your life is too easy, then make it hard. Put yourself in a position where you might not make it out successfully.

    The closest she and her like get to this is when they entertain the prospect of being raped on the streets by a Muzzie, Groid or Pakistani. Tingles. It may hurt but it beats terminal boredom—or so they believe.

    • Replies: @Poupon Marx
    , @Gvaltar
  57. @anon

    She’s a total nationalist, German super patriot. Globalists and scum like Rothchild hate her. She is a Germany Firster all the way. Of all the countries of Europe, she has the greatest affinity for Russia, knowing that Germany’s long term prosperity and well-being are tied to Russia. Under her party, Germany would secede from the EU and join BRICS and SCO. She is close to Victor Orban and Robert Fico of Slovakia. Lastly, she is honest and trustworthy.

  58. @ThreeCranes

    Somewhat paradoxically, no animal can live without the threat of danger.

    How so? What about the Panda and the Three Toed Sloth?

  59. Johan says:

    Great article.

    The description of the woman in question by the author, is neither a description of something which is peculiar to leftism or communism, or Marxism, or so called cultural Marxism, but a description of democratic man and woman. Democratic man is the eternally dissatisfied and hateful, eternally rabble-rousing, eternally trying to make everything perfect, democratic man is a radical.

    The woman in question although being in defiance, is the product of her family of democrats, likely politicized by her father in his daily talks with her at a young age. Contemporary leftism and woke does not fall out of the sky just like that, they are the breed of former generations of democratic people. They just grow longer toes than the toes of the former generations of democratic man.

    Democratic man takes chaos for diversity, slavery to the passions for freedom (Plato), and indulgence to the point of imbecility for tolerance. By far not only on the leftist spectrum.

    As Plato observed, democratic man does not make up a people (Das Volk), but are merely a collection of isolated individuals, or as we call it today, are a collection of atomized individuals. Democratic man is an atom without culture who becomes a client to institutions which grow like pedestals out of the ground, which shape him all the way and continually exert more and more power, shaping the minds of the atoms.

    The US is the main exporter of democracy, even imposing more democracy on European counries and therefor the main cause of the dissolving of cultural cohesion, to be replaced by institutions controlling the now free floating atoms.

    We anti-democrats, those who are really convinced of the degenerative nature of democracy, should not operate on the basis of the democratic left-right or democratic liberal-conservative opposition, which is a fake opposition. And neither on the basis of casting blame on so called cultural Marxists. In every democratic man hides an idiot and a radical out on destruction of culture, an incompetent who is out to place himself on the throne.

    • Troll: Gvaltar
    • Replies: @Gvaltar
  60. @DustyBuddy

    This is hasbara nonsense. Alice Weidel is a German nationalist, and populist. The AfD is the most popular party in Germany and advocates closer ties to Russia. She is anti-Globalist. My detailed exposition of her platform and character are found here on Comment 53 and 60. ZIDSO needs to nullify people like Alice Weidel

  61. “Leonie Plaar walking about the streets of Edinburgh…”

    How did they empty out those streets [not a single other person in eyesight]?

    Edinburgh’s a bustling city, filled with tons of people.

    • Replies: @Verymuchalive
  62. Rush says:

    The subject of this essay makes former New Zealand prime minister Jacinda Ardern seem like a normal woman. However reading about disturbed women for more than a few paragraphs is just too much.

  63. @obwandiyag

    When you stop the Dindu routine, you actually make a lot of sense.
    Keep it up!

  64. @Daniel Rich

    I suspect that it was filmed early on a summer morning.
    Edinburgh is not ” a bustling city, filled with tons of people.”
    Speaking as a native of Edinburgh, it’s dirty, noisy, overcrowded and expensive, full of City Breakers and AirB’n’Bers, not to mention the Subcontinental and Subsaharan detritus that have been pushed northward by successive British Governments. ( Even 20 years ago, it was not this way )

    That’s why I no longer live there.

    • Replies: @Daniel Rich
  65. @Poupon Marx

    A graphic of the massacre of Diatoma, a Greek village [posted here] described by a survivor, the Germans cutting babies out of pregnant women, and mutilating many of the bodies. A military tribunal, by senior officers later found no guilt or culpability of the Wehrmacht.

    Did they kill villagers with masturbation machines as well?

  66. RestiveUs says:
    @Fenrir_288

    we have been living in neo-communism for the past 25 years

    This is late stage capitalism.

    Make up your mind…

    • Replies: @Gvaltar
  67. “From Bolshevism, to Communism, to Feminism, they all stem from Judaism” – Dennis Prager (Founder of PragerU).

    Whether or not these ideologies are still controlled by the same people is up for debate.

    What isn’t debatable is the damage and destruction these ideologies have done to our Western countries.

    The subject of this article really exemplifies someone completely captured by these ideas, such that they reject all that is good & natural in the search for absolute power over their enemies and those who are perceived of as “The bad group” (White, male, straight, etc. etc. ad nauseum).

    Women are targeted for this brainwashing and it truly shows in specimens such as this.

    “It was always the women, and above all the young ones, who were the most bigoted adherents of the Party, the swallowers of slogans, the amateur spies and nosers−out of unorthodoxy.” —George Orwell, 1984

  68. Gvaltar says:
    @ThreeCranes

    Stop blaming your parents

    Who do you blame for immigration, outsourcing etc?

  69. Gvaltar says:
    @Johan

    controlling the now free floating atoms

    Controlled and free at the same time?

    • Replies: @Johan
  70. Gvaltar says:
    @RestiveUs

    How is communism and ending capitalism contradictory?

  71. JM says:
    @Poupon Marx

    You are wide of the mark on this. Perhaps you mean the village of Distomo? In which case your account is inaccurate. Check it out for yourself.

    BTW, talking about “innocent villagers” in Greece is itself a defamation. Almost all the Greeks fought as patriots, most under the leadership of arms of the KKE, Greek Communist Party which was pro-“Soviet”/British.

    The reason why the Germans were willing to field seven Armies (Divisions) to oppose the considerable, mainly peasant (village), Greek resistance (ELAS) was, not as you assert (out of German territorial ambition) but because Greece would otherwise certainly have been a British/American base, a few hundred km from the main German oil supplies at Ploiești, Romania. That proved a correct assessment because the distance from the nearest base, Tripoli, played a major role in the failure of the allied raid on Ploiești, Operation Tidal Wave, in August 1943.

    • Replies: @Poupon Marx
  72. @JM

    “Perhaps you mean the village of Distomo?” Yes, I stand correct on the name of the village.

    The reason why the Germans were willing to field seven Armies (Divisions) to oppose the considerable, mainly peasant (village), Greek resistance (ELAS) was, not as you assert (out of German territorial ambition) but because Greece would otherwise certainly have been a British/American base, a few hundred km from the main German oil supplies at Ploiești, Romania. That proved a correct assessment because the distance from the nearest base, Tripoli, played a major role in the failure of the allied raid on Ploiești, Operation Tidal Wave, in August 1943.

    This is curious and a rather mechanical and cheap response on your part. This could be filed under the classification of “military necessity”. Which, apparently to your purely material thinking, justifies the killing of women and children in small villages throughout Greece, France and other occupied countries. If that is the way you can justify mass murder of innocents, then you should have no problem with the Jews of Israel slaughtering Palestinian civilians making them bleed and die for land or other material gain.

    This implies a character defect with yourself, in that you appear to be a fraction of a whole human being. In this, you may find succor in other Germanic thinking thoughtless types, where narrowed focus on efficiency and completion is paramount to other messy considerations like morality, and the taking of human like and causing deep suffering because they are simply “in the way”.

    The cure for your neurotic, affectless personality is for you to experience first hand what you condone or dismiss in others, that is, for you and your family to suffer unimaginable anguish and horror that you simply accept as “necessity” in others. Hence, the general whining of Germans when the Red Army soldiers raped German women upon entering Berlin an pillaging the larder of what was left, leaving the “Good Germans” to starve and experience what they did to the Russian Slav population. With not the slightest pang of guilt, remorse, or sympathy.

    Everything I have written above comes right out of the watered down, ignored, and washed out Christianity of the West. The entire morality is stark, unyielding and clearly elucidated in Buddhism, the true antidote to casual, casuistry of dehumanization.

    • Troll: JM
    • Replies: @John Johnson
    , @JM
  73. Kingsmeg says:
    @Miro23

    It’s dogma – catechism. Simply indicating compliance with authority.

    Correct. All authoritarian societies and organizations devolve into this brainless conformism.

    I am reminded of 2 related quotes:

    Ignorance is strength – George Orwell

    Orwell was of course paraphrasing Jesus in the sermon on the mount:

    Blessed are the mentally retarded: for theirs is the kingdom of heaven. – accurate translation of Matthew 5:3

  74. @Poupon Marx

    Everything I have written above comes right out of the watered down, ignored, and washed out Christianity of the West. The entire morality is stark, unyielding and clearly elucidated in Buddhism, the true antidote to casual, casuistry of dehumanization.

    Oh God not more Boomer Buddhism.

    As if all of our problems can be solved by adopting a passive Eastern religion that completely failed to stop China from taking Tibet. White men need more passivity! That will help.

    Buddhism actually rejects any moral judgement between individuals.

    A Buddhist is not supposed to decree that a child murderer is morally worse than a j-walker. That is the universe around them which is not for them to judge. It’s all just water flowing. Can we not talk about how one of them killed a child? Nope and you can in fact get in trouble with for doing that. Sit cross legged and hum while the world happens beyond your control.

    They also have the most ridiculous leadership program. A complete rejection of the natural hierarchy. They try to find their sacred CHILD leader by having him pick the right objects. Watch the movie Kundun to see how this works. Completely ridiculous.

    Then there is the whole problem of them taking their intelligent men and making them celibate. Are you a deep thinker? Well put on this robe and have zero children. Sex with women is for the commoners.

    What kind of sicko came up with such a dysgenic system.

  75. Johan says:
    @Gvaltar

    Not at the same time indeed, a gradual process of unbinding and rebinding. Flee floating in the sense of unbinding from shared culture by means of destruction of culture, which is an ongoing process while the rebinding process by the (new) and more comprehensive web of institutions is also active.

  76. JM says:
    @Poupon Marx

    What a sick, sub-human, one-sided, interpretation of history and a perfect example of psychological projection.

  77. Johan says:
    @Lackadaisical Reader

    “The word “party” originates from the Middle English term partie, which means “a part, division, or section.”

    It is derived from the Old French partie, meaning “side, part, or portion,” which itself comes from the Latin partire, meaning “to divide or share.”

    The Latin root pars translates to “a part or piece,” linking to the Proto-Indo-European root pere-, which means “to grant or allot.”

    Today, “party” can refer to various types of gatherings, including birthday parties, surprise parties, and political parties, reflecting its broad application in social and legal contexts.

    I am using the word in the first and most broadest sense. Democratic man knows only political parties and birthday parties.

  78. Hence, the general whining of Germans when the Red Army soldiers raped German women upon entering Berlin an pillaging the larder of what was left, leaving the “Good Germans” to starve and experience what they did to the Russian Slav population. With not the slightest pang of guilt, remorse, or sympathy.

    Everything I have written above comes right out of the watered down, ignored, and washed out Christianity of the West.

    It was Hitler who mocked Christianity in private and made the decision to carry the war to his death instead of surrendering to the Allies.

    He knew full well that the Soviets would enter Germany and go on a rape fest. The Germans knew full well Soviet reprisals looked like.

    Another case of blaming Christianity without actually looking at history.

    If Hitler had waged his Eastern war while maintaining basic Christian morals then he would not have had so many Slavs united against him. His Siege of Leningrad made it clear as to what he had planned for them.

    Hitler could have prevented over 100k women from getting raped if he had surrendered in 1944 which was when he openly spoke of the war being lost. Huge numbers of Germans would have gone home to their families. He also could have negotiated a release of Soviet German prisoners to the Allies. Hitler was a man who hated everyone. Someone who loved the German people would not have shrugged at the prospect of mass rape followed by Germany becoming a Soviet state. Western Germany only existed because the Allies raced across Europe.

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply -


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
$
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Richard Parker Comments via RSS
PastClassics
From the Leo Frank Case to the Present Day
How America was neoconned into World War IV