The Unz Review: An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 Andrew Joyce Archive
Latter-Day Flagellants, Christianity, and the Politics of Evil
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

“Using these whips they beat and whipped their bare skin until their bodies were bruised and swollen and blood rained down, spattering the walls nearby. I have seen, when they whipped themselves, how sometimes those bits of metal penetrated the flesh so deeply that it took more than two attempts to pull them out.”
Heinrich of Herford, (c.1300–1370)

Enoch Powell, delivering perhaps the most notorious speech of 20th century British politics, warned that “In this country in 15 or 20 years’ time the black man will have the whip hand over the white man.” In much the same way as his demographic projections, the remarkable Enoch was more than a little off on timing, even if there is an obvious truth underlying every aspect of his broader prophetic warning. Britain is, like much of the West, now at a demographic tipping point, and the balance of power between the races is on a knife-edge. But does the Black man, at the present moment, really have the whip hand over the White man? Is it even the case in the United States, where the demographic balance is tipped even more heavily against Whites? I think not. Contemporary Black power in the West, in and of itself, is not self-sustaining but is rather dependent on a vast cultural and legal apparatus that Blacks had little or no role in designing. This apparatus is instead the contrivance of three actors: the Jews; politically, financially, and professionally incentivized Whites; and, finally, pathological and self-flagellating Whites. This last group is undoubtedly the most puzzling and catastrophic element of the current crisis. Much more horrifying than Powell’s utterance is the fact that the White man still holds the whip, but chooses to beat himself with it.

When I first saw images of Whites kneeling for Blacks, washing the feet of Blacks, and otherwise lending themselves to the hysteria of Black sainthood, I was confronted with a sequence of mental images from the distant past. History tells us that plagues are fertile ground for irrational self-sacrifice, and coronavirus, with a little help from the late George Floyd, has not disappointed. Joannes Stobaeus, in his Florilegium, noted that when a plague befell the Spartans “they received an oracle that they would be saved if some Spartans would be selected to be killed by the king.” Clement, in his First Letter to the Corinthians, pointed out that, faced with plagues, “many kings and people in charge, have given themselves to death after listening to an oracle, so that they might save their citizens with their own blood.” Diogenes Laertius, in his Vitae philosophorum, reports that an ancient plague in Athens provoked the killing of “two youths, Kratinos and Ktêsibios, and the suffering was relieved.” Hesiod, in his Works and Days, called for the moral cleansing of the land, and explained famine and plagues in his statement that “The whole state often suffers because of a wicked man, Who transgresses the gods and devises reckless deeds.” Thus, in times of plague, the urge to purge oneself of sins.

Most interesting among the self-sacrificial acts of the past are, in my opinion, that of the flagellants of the Black Death, derisively and scathingly labelled “the gashers” by the Jewish historian Ben-Zion Dinur. The masochistic flagellants, officially known as “Brethren of the Cross,” or “Brotherhood of the Flagellants,” were radical lay Catholics of both sexes (segregated in processions) who first made a major impact in thirteenth-century Germany during the Black Death. Travelling from town to town, they would hold prayers meetings and processions that would culminate in a massive spectacle where they would whip their flesh until the blood flowed, seeking, through this form of self-sacrifice, to avert a broader national calamity.

Although initially supported by the Church, it soon became clear the flagellants were anti-establishment dissidents in every respect. They rejected the authority of priests and clerics, who were regarded by the flagellants as sunk in sin and therefore intrinsic to the problem. The flagellants rejected the Eucharist, asserting that their blood sacrifice was a more authentic communion with Christ. Finally, they revealed their role as populist social revolutionaries by turning against all established elites, including the very wealthy, the nobility, the city leaders and, most interesting of all, the Jews. In fact, everywhere the flagellants went a violent reaction against the Jews followed. In Frankfurt, in July 1349, the flagellants stormed the Jewish neighborhood themselves, and set it on fire. Occasionally, such as in Mainz, when the Jews heard the flagellants were nearing a town or city, the Jews would launch a pre-emptive assault on Christians, with one chronicler reporting the Jews of Mainz slaughtered 200 Christians before the flagellants finally entered and eliminated the Jewish population. Unsurprisingly, the flagellants were quickly denounced as heretics by the existing elite power structure, and were ruthlessly suppressed to extinction throughout Europe.

Latter-Day Flagellants

In stark contrast to the role of the Brethren of the Cross, our latter-day White flagellants are truly birds of a feather with the elite status quo. Those lauding Blacks and subjecting themselves to humiliating acts of politically correct piety have accepted a form of White self-mortification that is entirely beneficial to our elites, and is without any truly redemptive or socially revolutionary features. The flagellants of the past may have acted in an irrational response to disease, but they transmuted this response into concrete social activism that benefited the broader ethnic group — by attempting to topple or undermine harmful and exploitative relationships at the top of society. Latter-day flagellants feign personal mortification, when in reality they cover themselves in temporary social kudos and self-congratulation. Individually, they harm not a hair on their own heads and spill not a drop of blood, but rather seek to ingratiate themselves into a system of social rewards and even financial benefits. And all the while, the personal fakery of these latter-day flagellants rips bloody shreds from the back of the group as a whole, demoralizing the kin group and energizing its enemies. The latter-day flagellants adopt the pose of self-sacrifice and abasement, throwing their racial kin under the proverbial bus in order to exalt themselves, and themselves alone. They avoid any suggestion of personal sin by professing their “anti-racism,” while flinging judgment and condemnation at those who refuse to bend the knee. The reality is that the latter-day flagellants need these refusers in order to look like “exceptions” in the first place.

The question of what to do about behavior like this has deeply troubled me for more than a decade. Thanks to the work of Kevin MacDonald, we certainly know more about its mechanics and origins than at any time previously. It’s now clear that this isn’t a new problem, even if it appears to be getting worse every year. In my own study of “White Pathology and the 1861 Morant Bay rebellion” for the 2013 special edition of The Occidental Quarterly, I was surprised and horrified at sheer callousness that some Whites could show towards their co-ethnics. The Morant Bay rebellion was a horrifically violent episode, with gruesome, extremely painful murders motivated by hatred of Whites. The town of Bowden was plundered, and the island curate “had his tongue cut out while he was still alive, an attempt is said to have been made to skin him.” Another individual “was ripped open and had his entrails taken out.” Others were “roasted alive” and “had their eyeballs scooped out.” According to The Times of London, the mob then indulged in alcoholic excess, harboring the “drunken dream of negro mastery and white slavery. It was Africa, hitherto dormant, that had broken out in their natures. … They desired the extermination of their emancipators.” In my study of the episode and the reactions it provoked in England, I commented:

To the clear-thinking individual, it was a plainly criminal, and unimaginably brutal series of actions, carried out for malicious reasons against a population targeted for being White. And yet, there was a liberal faction in England convinced not only that it was the Black population that were the true victims, but also that their fellow Whites were reprehensible monsters who deserved the fate which befell them. This pathological response, laden with a misplaced hyper-emotionality, would shake the Empire to its core, sapping its confidence, and bequeathing a legacy which is still felt to this day.

The main warriors on behalf of the Blacks were Christian philanthropists who believed that these races could be raised to standards of education and conduct which would place them alongside Europeans. Members of this group tended to be Non-Conformist, middle-class, and liberal or radical in their politics. Crucially, most had never travelled outside Britain, and had little or no experience with the races they so emphatically and persistently eulogized. The movement was centered around Exeter Hall, a residence in London. The term “Exeter Hall” thus became synonymous with what the brilliant Charles Dickens described as “platform sympathy for the Black and . . . platform indifference to our own countrymen.” Dickens wrote:

The Jamaica insurrection is another hopeful piece of business. That platform sympathy with the Black—or the Native, or the Devil—afar off, and that platform indifference to our own countrymen at enormous odds in the midst of bloodshed and savagery makes me stark wild.

It makes me stark wild too. Isn’t it absolutely terrifying that Dickens’s words on the indifference of these universalist elites to the plight of the working classes of their own people are entirely in keeping with what we see today? These people have the appearance of empathy, but not for anyone that looks like himself. Exeter Hall was largely responsible for the production and dissemination of a range of anti-slavery and pro-Black propaganda which, with its heady emotional characteristics, thrived on those under the influence of the Romantic movement. It was of course highly idealistic:

There was also significant involvement in the movement from the Protestant churches. It was the religious arm of Exeter Hall which was responsible for sending mission upon mission to the colonies with the aim of not only saving souls but of “regenerating whole races,” and it was this religious arm, in conjunction with the mainstream propaganda effort, which popularized the idea of the “noble savage” among the congregations of Britain’s churches.

The idea that Whites, particularly Anglo-Saxons, had a divinely ordained mission to raise up the backward peoples of the earth was driven by Exeter Hall’s most basic article of faith—that all peoples could be raised to the same high level of civilization as themselves. Liberals always have a very strong self-concept as morally superior. Moral posturing is, of course, now front and center in the contemporary West. I concluded my piece on Morant Bay by calling attention to an author who watched Steven Spielberg’s Amistad, recalling Whites “squirming in their seats,” and that afterwards a White couple emerged from the theatre “clinging to each other in a desperate attempt to manage the tragedy that had unfolded before them in graphic and picturesque fashion.” The connection is clear:

What we are thus seeing, in this and myriad other instances, is the emotional abuse and torture of a generation of Whites too ill-informed to generate appropriate intellectual or emotional responses to the fictions they are presented with. The dreamscape of Exeter Hall, in which traitors and murderers become national heroes, is entrenched. It has been absorbed, integrated, and assimilated into the White consciousness, and we, the ideological and psychological descendants of Dickens, are relegated to a much-maligned periphery for daring to suggest that the emperor has no clothes.

Placing the blame for pathological levels of self-abasement solely at the feet of Christianity, however, as some in our circles have done, strikes me as all too easy. Jordan Peterson, simultaneously capable of intellectual sublimities and travesties, is absolutely correct in his observation in 12 Rules for Life:

It is true that the idea of virtuous self-sacrifice is deeply embedded in Western culture (at least insofar as the West has been influenced by Christianity, which is based on the imitation of someone who performed the ultimate act of self-sacrifice). Any claim that the Golden Rule does not mean “sacrifice yourself for others” might therefore appear dubious. But Christ’s archetypal death exists as an example of how to accept finitude, betrayal and tyranny heroically — how to walk with God despite the tragedy of self-conscious knowledge — and not as a directive to victimise ourselves in the service of others. To sacrifice ourselves to God (to the highest good, if you like) does not mean to suffer silently and willingly when some person or organisation demands more from us, consistently, than is offered in return. That means we are supporting tyranny, and allowing ourselves to be treated like slaves. It is not virtuous to be victimised by a bully.

There’s no question, however, that many Christian churches have completely folded into patterns of victimizing themselves, or at least engaging in high-kudos superficial acts of self-abasement, in the service of Blacks and the broader culture of critique. There’s also no question that they view such behavior as highly virtuous. In this regard, I found Cardinal Carlo Vigano’s recent letter to Donald Trump on current events to be extremely timely. It’s obvious from the letter, and from his history of activism against Pope Francis, abortion, and the homosexual network at the Vatican, that Vigano is “to the Right” of Trump in every way, but it’s interesting that he attempts to communicate with Trump in Trump’s own language — employing terms such as “Deep State” to try to communicate something far more profound. Most interesting is Vigano’s denunciation of “adversaries, who often hold strategic positions in in government, in politics, in the economy, and in the media.” These adversaries “serve themselves, do not hold any moral principles, want to demolish the family and the nation, exploit workers to make themselves unduly wealthy, foment internal divisions and wars, and accumulate power and money.” He explains that those who help these adversaries are acting out of “self-interest or fearfulness.” This certainly describes the latter-day flagellants, as does Vigano’s condemnation of those within the Church who are “mercenary infidels who seek to scatter the flock and hand the sheep over to be devoured by ravenous wolves … Just as there is a deep state, there is also a deep church that betrays its duties and forswears its proper commitments before God.” For Vigano, who has previously indicated that the Catholic Church had been infiltrated by a combination of Jews, organized homosexuals, and Freemasons, there is a:

media narrative which seeks not to fight racism and bring social order, but to aggravate dispositions; not to bring justice, but to legitimize violence and crime; not to serve the truth, but to favor one political faction. And it is disconcerting that there are Bishops – such as those whom I recently denounced – who, by their words, prove that they are aligned on the opposing side. They are subservient to the deep state, to globalism, to aligned thought, to the New World Order which they invoke ever more frequently in the name of a universal brotherhood which has nothing Christian about it.

I’m not from a Catholic background, and I’ve been very critical of elements and expressions of Christianity in the past, but even I have to concede, that, objectively speaking, Vigano is on to something. One of the most Christian people I know is absolutely disgusted with White behavior for Black Lives Matter, while the most anti-Christian person I know (a friend of a friend) is also the most virtue-signalling, pro-homosexual, pro-miscegenation cretin I’ve ever encountered. There are no simple answers here, and if one is to denounce the Church as the root and cause of some of our major problems, one might as well denounce everything else in Western modernity that’s been co-opted by our adversaries. It should be clear that there wouldn’t be much left that we couldn’t denounce.

The question of why Whites are allowing themselves to be subjected to this kind of treatment on a mass scale, and in some cases encouraging it, rather requires a clear and unflinching view of the mass perception of White identity politics today. Quite frankly, we have been designated the ultimate evil, and no punishment or humiliation will be enough to satisfy our enemies.

The Politics of Evil

One of the most fascinating series of books I’ve read is Jeffrey Burton Russell’s Cornell-published quadrilogy on the concept of evil in Western culture [Satan: The Early Christian Tradition (1981), Lucifer: The Devil in the Middle Ages (1984), Mephistopheles: The Devil in the Modern World (1986), and The Prince of Darkness: Radical Evil and the Power of Good in History (1988)]. These works aren’t just an outstanding exercise in historical and religious scholarship, but also in their analysis of the development of the concept of evil as a political idea. For Russell, who develops the theme to an unmatched degree, there is great power in being able to label one’s opponent and their ideas as evil. To be labelled as being in league with the Devil—or the modern equivalent—is tantamount to political (and in extreme cases, physical) death. If you doubt such an interpretation, just read Dante’s Inferno, which is as much a summary of medieval Florentine politics and a list of Dante’s personal enemies, as it is a piece of religious poetry.

There really is no question about the fact that White identity politics is post-modernity’s only radical political evil, and Adolf Hitler is its Great Satan, looming over a horde of contemporary minor demons. Like Dante’s Inferno, and his various levels of Hell, our contemporary politics is judged morally on the proximity of one’s ideology to that held by the Great Satan in the lowest Hell. Tucker Carlson may be deemed to toil, for example, in the second or third circle, but you readers, with your race pride and anti-Semitism, well, you are beyond all hope in the ninth circle. Our post-religious culture even has a physical substitute for Hell, in the form of a long-abandoned camp in rural Poland.

In the West, what else comes close to this politico-moral taxonomy that borders on the religious in its dogmatic excess? Nothing. Even Islamic terrorism, one of the few aspects of modern life that isn’t readily assimilable by global capitalism, is always qualified in most media and academic treatments as implying some mediating factors, such as Western imperialism, the alienation of Muslim minorities, or any of a wide range of social and environmental causes that are ultimately the fault of Europeans. For those in charge of the national conversation, Islamic terrorism is something explainable and therefore, in the final examination, non-diabolical. By contrast, arguments for internet censorship targeting White identity websites have been advanced by associating White ethnic activism with conduct that is as low and demonic as pedophilia and the very worst of obscene material, which is probably the only other element of our rotten contemporary culture that continues (for now) to be viewed as an example of radical evil. Of all political stances, only the assertion of White ethnic interests is deemed by our mainstream as equally irrational and immoral, being based on the alleged “fantasy” of race and the moral crime of wishing to “dominate” or adopt “supremacy” over other groups.

Whites can prostrate themselves in the name of “anti-racism” because by doing so they’re fighting the religious or secular contemporary incarnation of Satan. Historically, it has been extremely dangerous, and often fatal, to be seen as in league with Satan, and alternatively there have been massive incentives to joining crusades against demonic activity. One thinks of the witch craze, the purging of various heretical sects (including the flagellants), and the experiences of the early Protestants. What we are currently seeing culturally, economically, and politically, is an increasing pressure on people to demonstrate whether or not they are on the side of the Devil. Language such as “White silence is violence,” is increasingly asserting that there is no room for Whites to sit on the fence. Whites must declare whether they are good (subservient) or bad (retaining pride), and regardless of the religious beliefs of these Whites, if any, every cue in our culture is making it extremely clear which side will provide them with incentives and which side is laden with social doom. This is very similar to the process that all cultures undergo when there is a dramatic shift against a certain set of beliefs and/or populations.

The point here is that all conventional strategies designed to move White dissident thought from the fringe to the mainstream may be doomed to failure because they neglect the fact we aren’t even on the same spectrum of political possibility, or even within the same psychological framework. We are exiles, declared to be total anathema. To label something evil is to imply it is willfully engaged in the chaotic, unnatural, and sadistic. Evil implies an unregenerate irrationality as well as a complete detachment from morals. It also implies the willful infliction of suffering, and perhaps also a joy in it. Fighting from this position with appeals to things like IQ differences, crime rates, the data on police shootings of Blacks and Whites, or blandishments about the right of all peoples to self-determination, is probably entirely pointless.

Ultimately, the mainstream narrative about White identity politics is based on unreason and outright falsehood. An edifice built so obviously on an emotive disdain for facts and objective reality will be entirely unmoved by rejoinders employing them. Accusations of Leftist hypocrisy are as ubiquitous as they are ineffective, because ultimately people on the Left, or Right for that matter, don’t really care about what is correct or incorrect, or at least don’t care enough to do something meaningful about it. What they do care about is what is “evil,” and if they can look good and get rich fighting it then all the better. What is really required, therefore, is a “fight fire with fire” strategy that embodies emotionality and triggers psychological responses that resonate on a deeper level, beyond consciousness. This necessitates a propaganda designed exclusively to instill feelings of disgust, fear, and hatred for those opposed to White interests. In the final analysis, it must be hammered home that our opponents are not wrong, weak-willed, venal, or corrupt — they are morally, politically, and spiritually evil. They belong in the lowest Hell.

I understand the necessity of framing our arguments in reasonable terms. I understand the value of producing evidence, and presenting facts. But I also understand that these things have limited tactical value. The symbiotic elites of medieval Germany were safely ensconced in their centers of power until the flagellants came to town, with their emotive, violent, grisly, and gloriously fanatical denunciations of evil. Within that environment, riding on the crest of a crisis, the heretics and rebels became the arbiters of truth and the judges of society. Dispute as you will their claim to have banished the Devil, but can you deny they banished, even for a short time, at least some social evils?

Looked at from an angle not dripping with footnotes and statistics, isn’t it clear that our opponents are, in some sense, crawling with “demons”? Aren’t they riddled with the most malevolent of intentions? Don’t they bleat endlessly about eugenic policies of yesteryear while paving the way for “after-birth abortion.” They’re not wrong, my friends, they’re evil.

Our moral superiors: Dressed in White and dripping with blood
Our moral superiors: Dressed in White and dripping with blood

Don’t they chastise us for a distant past no-one alive had any role in, while supporting a nation where it’s spectator entertainment to watch bomb blasts tear apart a people who don’t have the luxury of superpower sponsorship, and barely have the infrastructure to survive? They’re not misguided, they’re evil.

Israeli Spectator Sport: Watching the Slaughter in Gaza, 2014
Israeli Spectator Sport: Watching the Slaughter in Gaza, 2014

Contemporary politics and “social progress” is awash with evils. The “universal brotherhood” Cardinal Vigano warns us about is typified by blindness to mass rape, the abuse of children, murder on a vomit-inducing scale, corruption, avarice, and the cowardly evasion of responsibility everywhere. The society we live in is sunk in filth so deep that coronavirus isn’t even a fraction of the plague it deserves.

I’ll conclude these reflections with a final comment from the medieval period. In one of the most remarkable texts of the Middle Ages, Pugio Fidei or The Dagger of Faith, the cleric Raymond Martini (1220–1285) began to turn the tide against Jewish financial and political influence in Europe. Employing a team of scholars, including former Jews, he launched an intensive investigation of the Talmud and Midrash, including how they were actually interpreted by contemporary Jews. Unlike earlier anti-Jewish figures like Agobard of Lyon, Martini didn’t waste time with complaints about Jewish slave-trading of Christians or trying to convince elites to “do the right thing.” His argument was simple and devastating: all that Jews presented as positive was negative, all that they presented as Divine was Satanic. Jewish “Light unto the Nations” was “Darkness unto the Nations.” Jewish “truth” was lies. Jewish “freedom” was slavery. Jewish “justice” was injustice. As historian Robert Bonfil comments, “Martini’s book was influential through the end of the Middle Ages and even into the Renaissance.”[1]R. Bonfil, ‘The Devil and the Jews in the Christian Consciousness of the Middle Ages,’ in S. Almog (ed) Antisemitism Through the Ages (New York: Hebrew University of Jerusalem, 1988), 97. This period witnessed more expulsions of the Jews than any other in history. They say the greatest trick the Devil ever pulled was convincing people he didn’t exist. Martini would disagree, and insist that by far his cleverest ruse was to pretend he was an angel, while pointing an accusing finger at you.

Notes

[1] R. Bonfil, ‘The Devil and the Jews in the Christian Consciousness of the Middle Ages,’ in S. Almog (ed) Antisemitism Through the Ages (New York: Hebrew University of Jerusalem, 1988), 97.

 
Hide 168 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. Rational says:

    BRAINWASHING WHITES INTO SELF-EXTERMINATION—THE BIGGEST JEWISH PSYCHOPS IN HISTORY.

    Thanks, Sir, for the great article. You make great points.

    You mentioned 3 groups—the Judaists, the Oligarchs and brainwashed self-hating whites. I think the Judaists are responsible for 90% of this problem, as they control the media and the deep state, which includes our corrupt Judiaciary (even John Roberts, chief of the Supreme Court, has become a lib-barbarian, liar, fraud, writing fake left-wing opinions).

    Judaists use verbal and physical terrorism, such as calling patriots or any race realist white supremacists, neo-nazis, racists, getting them fired from jobs, college, and pushing them off the internet (eg. vdare is going to lose its website). They have set up a huge echo-chamber bombarding the goyim from 100 directions with white self-hate day in and day night to fool the white goyim into thinking that “everybody is licking the negroe’s boots, so why are you not a good dog, you racist, you hater?”

    About causes, Christianity is the biggest factor in white self-flagellation. It is the only religion that promotes worship of your enemy (the Judaists) that seek your extermination.

    “When the LORD your God brings you into the land you are to possess and casts out the many peoples living there, you shall then slaughter them all and utterly destroy them…You shall save nothing alive that breathes…You shall make no agreements with them nor show them any mercy. You shall destroy their altars, break down their images, cut down their groves and burn their graven images with fire. For you are a holy people unto the LORD thy God and He has chosen you to be a special people above all others upon the face of the earth…” — Deutronomy 7: 1-8.

    Judaists spit on Christians in Israel, call Mother Mary a who.. and say Jesus is boiling in excrement in hell in their Talmud (See: “Talmud Unmasked” by Rev. Pranthis, “Jewish history, Jewish religion” by Israel Shahak.)

    But the gullible Christians worship the evil Judaists, their exterminators as “God’s Chosen People”.

    “Many Jews therefore view enthusiastic Christian believers—no matter how reliably they support Israel and American Jews—as enemies by definition,” – Judaist Michael Medved, 2009.

    Religion can be very important in giving people a sense of racial unity, national pride, etc. The problem is that Christianity cannot do that, as it is a foreign Middle Eastern religion, based on worshiping a mythical middle-eastern dark brown man of a different race and religion (Judaist) using books that promote self-hatred. See his photo on Popular Mechanics:

    https://www.popularmechanics.com/science/health/a234/1282186/

    That is why whites must turn to ancient white-centric pre-Christian religions and leave Christianity to escape this extermination.

  2. Rational says:

    ANOTHER LINK TO PHOTO OF FORENSIC JESUS, A DARK BROWN MAN

    If the Pop. Mechanics link does not have the photo, here is one that does:

    https://news.yahoo.com/forensic-recreation-jesus-christ-not-141028287.html

    • Disagree: Fr. John
  3. Juckett says:
    @Rational

    You are correct . Remove yourselves from that Abrahamic desert death cult. Then you can begin to realize your true potential and capabilities my White brothers and sisters. That cult never truly resonated with your true nature. That is why it was forced upon you.

  4. R.C. says:

    Mr. Andrew Joyce, Thank You!
    In this time where inanity is elevated to a high art form, this is by far the best analysis that I have read about our ongoing theater of the absurd where modern Western reality has been intentionally hijacked to the point that facts not only no longer matter, but that those who express them are castigated, assaulted and worse, such as seen in the control of and efforts by the BLM (“BM”) as orchestrated by the willful malevolents of what I call the supranational “Team FUKUSraHell,” and their toadies in government and the ‘Back Flow Media’ (BFM).
    EXCELLENT!
    R.C.

  5. Fox says:

    This image of insane, lugubrious flagellants, singing somber songs about denial of joy and life, invading town after town as in the middle ages in Europe, leaving a scent of death and decay behind them has also occurred to me when seeing modern day descendants of these fanatics kneel to the image of their insane fantasy, refusing to do their duty as officers sworn to uphold the law or as deputies of the people who elected them as their representatives in a civilized system of government. I have often wondered about the flagellants’, or also about witch burners’ whereabouts today, about what they’d be in our days and thought: Leftists, Bolsheviks. Now I have to add SJW, Antifa, BLM, the hair-trigger indignation industry, people who get red in their face with anger about white privilege and white supremacism, notions as meaningless as detructive. All of these are fanatic culture destroyers, enemies of the common man, bringers of death and decay.

    How fast civilization can break down! Who would have thought that there is only a thin coat of paint on the reality of savagery, primitivism, religious fanaticism.

    • Replies: @SunBakedSuburb
    , @Whitewolf
  6. @Rational

    “…But the gullible Christians worship the evil Judaists, their exterminators as “God’s Chosen People”….”

    Not this Christian! I am not a Christian Zionist, doncha know. But that you call yourself rational makes sense….now prove to me that you saw ape turn into man empirically or explain how Darwin saw finches evolve over a few voyages to the Galapagos Islands or how something evolved from nothing (the universe)…and I might consider switching back to your pagan or atheist “religion.” NOT! Christ, not religion…but you can keep your “religion” between you and the flying spaghetti monster….

    Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahh!

    As for the “extermination,” I’ll take a Noahide decapitation over the Noahide slavery you envision any day!

    • Replies: @Fr. John
  7. Vojkan says:

    Lucifer disguised as Prometheus. The talmudists are a plague but if there weren’t Jews there’d still be the free-masons. The devil has another great trick. He sometimes tells the truth to denigrate it as a conspiracy theory.
    I am glad I’m Orthodox, we don’t kneel. We bow our head, sometimes we even lean over to show respect, but we never kneel, not even before God when we pray. He has made all of us to stand, emancipated and dignified, not to kneel or crawl like serpents.
    Unfortunately, many of our brethren have been so mesmerised by Western apparent wealth that to become members of the club, they’ve started mimicking behaviours that are incompatible with Orthodoxy.

  8. Icy Blast says:
    @Rational

    “Christian Zionism” is an almost exclusively American phenomenon which began to develop and gain momentum around 1800, the same time Mormonism was invented. Before condemning Christianity, you can at least discover what orthodox Christian doctrine is. You can start by reading the Englishman George Holford’s 1815 classic, “The Destruction of Jerusalem.” Consulting E. Michael Jones might be a good second step. It is simply slanderous and ignorant to conflate Christianity with the absurd propaganda of a a Protestant splinter group – a backwoods cult led by the likes of Scofield, Ryrie, and two fly-by-night hucksters named Lindsay and Hagee.

  9. Rahan says:

    The Baizuo have rejected traditional hierarchies and replaced them with BDSM hierarchies.

    To them the relationship of the citizen with the state/corporation is that of a BDSM slave to a master. You let the master control your whole life, and you feel free and happy through a total lack of freedom and regular humiliation, but it’s “consensual” and you get a veto about certain things.

    If your Dominant demands you get urinated upon by some passing Arab, than this is part of your freedom and happiness to submit to this.

    In a sense this really is a manifestation of “Anal Democracy/Tranny Tyranny” as a mostly unconscious political system supported by the liberast half.

    Rejecting your masculinity is also part of the game, it’s the “sissification fetish” which is growing geometrically, reinforced by regular doses of hypno-porn provided by the MindGeek corporation.

    When the Jews deconstructed the “essentialist and rigid” structures of society, family, and the individual, this was marketed as the road to freedom, but in reality this was “stage 1”. “Stage 2” is what we see now–once civilization and the individual have been softened up, they all are placed on “correct” prescription drugs, and NEW essentialist and rigid structures are now imposed, through law, media, brainwashing in kindergarten and school, and increasingly powerful combinations of drugs and porn.

    This self-flagellation hysteria has deep mechanisms below the surface. Many of them really are “post-human” in the sense of being utterly reprogrammed, and them being addicted to this process of being reprogrammed, and constantly maintaining it themselves, and seeing any glimpse of reality as an existential threat by fascists.

    …Mao inherited a China where half the population was addicted to opium. This is rarely mentioned, but it took him about five years to do a “reform or perish” thing on them. Many reformed, many perished. But this old-fashioned opium addiction is 10% of what today’s Zogbot baizuo have been subjected to.

    We don’t even know how to start the deprogramming, because all across the board Zog is shutting down any attempts to unravel what goes on inside the minds of homos, trannies, and junkies, it is now a crime to try to find out what is going on there, and how exactly the brainwashing takes place to the extent of Brit kids proclaiming themselves trannies soaring by 4000 percent.
    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2018/09/16/minister-orders-inquiry-4000-per-cent-rise-children-wanting/

    A sudden 4000 percent rise in tranny kids is just the visible tip of the iceberg, and also just a modest start of the great changes happening through social and mental engineering. It’s going to be a 10 000 percent and then a 1 000 000 percent rise in everything very soon. Probably already happening under the radar.

    And the new social contract of the state/corporation being the total dominant of a happy and free slave has already become an intuitively self-evident utopia for half the population. Again, this is just the start.

    • Thanks: anon8383892
    • Replies: @Digital Samizdat
  10. Icy Blast says:

    To illustrate Joyce’s point, we need only listen to the nauseating pronouncements of the current CEO of “Chick-Fil-A.”

  11. A fascinating essay. Many thanks.

    • Agree: mark green
  12. Anonymous[293] • Disclaimer says:

    This necessitates a propaganda designed exclusively to instill feelings of disgust, fear, and hatred for those opposed to White interests. In the final analysis, it must be hammered home that our opponents are not wrong, weak-willed, venal, or corrupt — they are morally, politically, and spiritually evil. They belong in the lowest Hell.

    This is going to be fun (In the Army sense, meaning something so truly horrible that it can only be referred to by a euphemism). I’m not saying that there is any alternative — there isn’t one, we have irreconcilable physical interests on the survival level (“it’s them or us” in ordinary English). European descended Whites need European developed society/civilization to live in, every one of the other four genetic groups (Murray, _Human Diversity_) say they cannot live in it and all four are attempting to abolish it or keep it away.

    Remember that the world has nuclear weapons now, and is highly overpopulated. A serious dispute between groups that regard each other as mutually evil could be very destructive (EMP, air blast, ground blast on counter-value targets). Consider also the net of world trade that feeds the current world. Once that is gone, the current world is not fed. It is also not clothed or housed or supplied with fuel. This has happened several times in world history — the Bronze Age Collapse, the fall of the Western Roman Empire, more recently on a smaller scale during WW II, when Burma suffered a famine that the combatants did not relieve as they were fighting each other. Starvation and the consequent disease are the real killers of civil populations.

    The above arguments have been used by the “christian flagellant” analogs Joyce describe so well and vividly to justify the current policy of “tolerance”, a euphemism for surrender. Look a the result we now face:
    * The countervalue targets (cities, manufacturing, even farm/ranching product processing) have largely been destroyed already. The US capital plant is largely depreciated; its replacement is in other countries. We, whose ancestors defeated Hitler, find ourselves unable to support ourselves, as did the USSR, which also defeated Hitler. The current urban riots will destroy yet more of the remaining US capital stock if money is spent in repairing urban infrastructure that will never produce a stream of repayments.
    * Worldwide trade has been marginally profitable since 2008. It has been kept alive largely by devaluing the American currency (US Dollar).
    * Feeding African population is only marginally possible now, and a major famine there is projected for 2021.
    * If (when) globalization fails, perhaps due to failure of the international reserve currency (US Dollar) and the actions of China, which is predatory to its trading partners, the effects would include several regional wars. We are already seeing the run-up to four of them: China vs. India, Turkey vs. Egypt, Iran vs. Iraq, Pakistan vs. India. BTW, don’t be surprised if China and Pakistan ally against India. Note that all these regional conflicts involve nuclear armed adversaries. Right now they are suppressed, but if suppression fails, at least some of them will go hot.

    In short, the evils we have been trying to hide through surrender are now being _caused by that surrender_.

    So, to Hell with the argument and the people who made it. Hammer home that our opponents are not wrong, weak-willed, venal, or corrupt — they are morally, politically, and spiritually evil. They belong in the lowest Hell. Enough of this stupid game.

    • Troll: Ghan-buri-Ghan
    • Replies: @Emily
    , @Alfred
  13. Anon[517] • Disclaimer says:

    There is a type of woman who favors a rotten child so much that when he behaves badly away from her eye, she insists that he’s always innocent. When a liberal makes an excuse for a criminal black, it’s only a version of this. The bad blacks are pets of the whites, and when they make a mess on the floor instead of on the newspaper, the liberal makes excuses for the pet. We see similar things when whites make excuses for rioting and looting blacks.

    This type of liberal shirks responsibility, and is a terrible parent and teacher. They’re lousy at raising their kids. Look at the white kids who are joining the riots. Many of them are absolute dysfunctional freaks who are the result of bad or non-existent parenting. If their parents can’t even raise them right, of course these parents see nothing wrong with black crime.

    This type of liberal is willfully blind and wants to stay that way.

    • Agree: botazefa, Alfred
    • Replies: @Ris_Eruwaedhiel
  14. @Rational

    Love of your enemy or compassion for your enemy is not worship of your enemy. I think your simplistic ideas contain several other errors or deceptions. You may be the enemy in disguise, fake Rational.

    • Agree: Fuerchtegott
    • Replies: @Ann Nonny Mouse
  15. @Ann Nonny Mouse

    I mean, love of your enemy is not acceptance that the animosity is justified. It is much closer to forgiveness.

  16. @Rational

    Early Greek ikons of baby Jesus in his mother’s arms, intended to glorify Jesus, show them both with dark brown skins. They were not Europeans, they were Semites.

    But so what?

    Something that seems to me noticeable about early writings is an absence of any racial consciousness.

    That probably means every stranger was of a different race. The man from the village across the hill is of a different race from the people of this village.

    Exodus and Numbers and such have constant references to different tribes, different races, from a foreign land 50 miles from our village.

    Shakespeare writes of foreigners, e.g. the Moor who lived in Venice, but doesn’t connect the evil doing with being of the other race.

  17. Alfred says:

    The idea that Whites, particularly Anglo-Saxons, had a divinely ordained mission to raise up the backward peoples of the earth was driven by Exeter Hall’s most basic article of faith—that all peoples could be raised to the same high level of civilization as themselves.

    I am very familiar with the hypocrisy of the English. My school headmaster, Robert Drayson, was proficient in it. I remember a sermon in which he was making an appeal on behalf of the starving children of Biafra – a part of Nigeria that was seeking independence from the rest of Nigeria. The British had important oil interests in Nigeria – the biggest exporter of oil from Africa at the time. The British were helping in many ways the government of Lagos reoccupy Biafra – hence the starvation. There was of course the customary embargo / sanctions. The sermon did not mention the role of the British government and oil companies in this engineered catastrophe.

    Bob Drayson, Headmaster of Stowe whose muscular Christianity and tireless persistence revived the school’s fortunes

    Robert Drayson (Wikipedia)

    BTW, the Wikipedia entry regarding his heroism by sinking The German auxiliary cruiser Komet, does not mention that the British, by code breaking, knew the exact planned route of the Germans. It was not by chance that they had this enormous success. I am not trying to demean his achievement. Also, the crew on his boat did not get medals and all the rest of it – the British Class System.

    • Replies: @Old Palo Altan
  18. I CHING hexagram 56, The Wanderer, line 6 “A bird burns its own nest. First he laughs, then he cries out. He loses his cow like docility too easily. There will be evil.
    Interpretation: He rejoices at another’s misfortune, then finds that he himself is involved in the disaster. Such a loss of equanimity leads to his down fall.
    – From A. Douglas translation 1971

    I Will add that authority/credibility once lost is not easily regained. Bending knees and kissing feet as looters and arsonists are starting to ruin cities is inappropriate and a bit premature if defeat is the fate.

    And of course it has been the mass media companies, like the HBO with Plot Against America that slanders Charles Lindbergh and portrays race riots, that has been putting out the pallets of psychological hate bricks for years. Now the media controllers are trying out their newly tuned joy stick and it seems to cause blacks to riots plum well. When oh when will it boomerang?

    • Agree: Alfred
    • Replies: @Anonymous
  19. Blankaerd says:

    I have to correct a portion of your article here. You claimed that Enoch Powell said that:

    In this country in 15 or 20 years’ time the black man will have the whip hand over the white man

    This is a quote Powell recited from one of his constituents, it did not come from Powell himself. So his prediction you claimed was off was not even his prediction to begin with.

    Other than that: Brilliant article, I’ve been thinking for weeks now that this BLM craze really resembles some sort of religious revival (but not a very evolutionary adaptive one at that) but I could not quite make the same parallels to the past or articulate it quite so good as you did right here.

    • Agree: Curmudgeon
    • Replies: @Curmudgeon
  20. Hartnell says:

    A very wonderfully written article Andrew on the current problem in the West today. I never saw it quite like that but you have really framed it so well. It is like the flagellants of the past and it is utter madness what is happening. However, I do see some light at the end of the tunnel. Lately when I go on twitter, I see alot of people furious with BLM. What surprised me the most however was that many of these posters are just average looking people and they are posting pro-white messages that only would have been seen on a more radical website like Stormfront 10 years ago.

    I think that people in the West are starting to really get fed up now. I don’t think the opposition is going to be purely white nationalist entirely but I think in the long run you could promote a healthy white Identitarian message out of this.

    As for the Jews in Israel, if I’m honest, both the Jews and the Palestinians there are equal in terms of the hatred they have for each other. I wouldn’t be surprised if on the other side of the fence, you had Palestinians spectating and enjoying the view of rockets falling into Israeli territory. I never see a “right” side in this conflict.

    • Replies: @Alfred
    , @ploni almoni
  21. The unforgettable ‘Procession of the Flagellants’ scene set in the middle ages, from Ingmar Bergman’s epic 1957 film, ‘The Seventh Seal’

    Many in the crowd swept away by the masochistic fanaticism, just as today

    Video 3min19

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WDMl58alS4c

  22. gotmituns says:

    The Christian church has been completely judaized since the early 20th century.

  23. How fast civilization can break down! Who would have thought that there is only a thin coat of paint on the reality of savagery, primitivism, religious fanaticism.

    Jesus christ – you’re not going to – indirectly – hint at one more Jew? – I mean, even if it was true what the books to say, that Sigmund Freud said this – – – and it is true, isn’t it – one could still assume, that he did not say so in order to speak the truth, but rather because he tried to deceive ordinary white folks with the truth. – By now, I might rather sound like a 4-d-chess player, I know, which is in itself something Jewish, and thus reveal that my thoughts too are already obscured by all kinds of overlordy clouds. Oh, yeah. See – huh – – – q. e. d!!! – – – (Just don’t ask me what, thank you Sir – I’m fine! – I’d rather be happy than worry, just like this famous black singer once proposed…)

    • Replies: @Fox
  24. Placing the blame for pathological levels of self-abasement solely at the feet of Christianity, however, as some in our circles have done, strikes me as all too easy.

    Not every problem requires an intricately complex solution. In fact, the simplest answer is often the correct one. And in this case it is indeed solely Christianity and its characteristically Bolshevik worldview that is really at the heart of this. And this Christian ethic has definitely filtered into liberalism and SJW culture. They really are just another sect of this disease, just with blacks replacing Jesus as the saviour.

    The Ancient Greeks and Romans weren’t exactly known for killing and cucking each other over Africans.

    • Agree: Ris_Eruwaedhiel
    • Replies: @Jake
  25. Alfred says:
    @Hartnell

    I never see a “right” side in this conflict.

    It has always been a question of might. If the Palestinians were armed, the Jews would never have entered Palestine. But the country was occupied by the British and previously by the Turks. The Palestinians didn’t have a chance against the Jews who were armed and trained to use arms. The Jews even shot down 5 British Spitfires over Sinai – using British Spitfires that they bought as surplus and flown by mercenary pilots. The Jewish mechanics had worked on Spitfires in the UK in WW2.

    Today, the picture is entirely different. The most populated area of Israel is quite tiny. The Hezbollah can readily saturated it with rockets. The demographics in the region are quite frightening. Egypt now has 100 million people. Syria has not collapsed. Lebanon has a large wealthy diaspora that financially supports its relatives in Lebanon. I suspect that Saudi Arabia will be the first domino to fall. The princely rulers are thoroughly hated in much of that fake country.

    Spitfire vs. Spitfire: Aerial Combat in Israel’s War of Independence

    “War of Independence” is a bit of a joke. The Palestinians were not the occupiers.

  26. “Evil implies an unregenerate irrationality as well as a complete detachment from morals. It also implies the willful infliction of suffering, and perhaps also a joy in it.”

    The key word from the above quote is “unregenerate,” which recalls Hillary Clinton’s “basket of deplorables who are irredeemable, thankfully not part of America,” referring to those who supported Donald Trump’s candidacy for President. That a mainstream politician could make such a pronouncement, with all the implications of terror and revenge against those in political opposition, and not be immediately cast into political oblivion suggests that politics in America is hopeless. That remark, late 2015, presaged the BLM, antifa war against us, “the deplorables” that five years later will likely bring a President and Congress into power that will move for our moral, legal and social “excommunication.”

  27. @Rational

    You seem to have deliberately overlooked a few parts of this excellent article.
    I’m not a native reader/speaker, but still think it might be good enough to question your reading comprehension skills.

  28. @Anon

    Excellent observation.

    One thing I noticed about liberals – the more loathsome the objects of their solicitude, the more they patted themselves on their backs for their “understanding” and “compassion.”

    • Agree: Colin Wright
  29. @Vojkan

    I am glad I’m Orthodox, we don’t kneel. We bow our head, sometimes we even lean over to show respect, but we never kneel, not even before God when we pray. He has made all of us to stand, emancipated and dignified, not to kneel or crawl like serpents.

    Main REASON why slaveMasters waging genocides against us and other people refusing to submit to “chosen” ones.
    God Bless Mother Nature and may Mother Nature continue to Bless God.

    • Replies: @Mefobills
  30. @Icy Blast

    Splinter group is right. America is renowned for mad splinters off the Protestants. Mormons, okay. Uniquely renowned for mad cults, America.

    But notice that Protestant heretics are not Protestants. Also notice it gets worse than that. The Scofield Bible is not really the Scofield Bible, it’s the Untermyer Bible, a work of Zionist deception. The known crook, the known fraudster Scofield was just a seemingly Christian frontman, financed by the Jewish genius, evil genius Samuel Untermyer to make his edition of the Bible, still genuine KJV but chock full of Zionist notes, look Christian. Scofield’s name on it, Scofield falsely pretending to be a D.D., made it look legit to dumb Christians.

    Untermyer was also the schemer who really pushed the U.S. into WW1 and later organised the killing of Jews in Nazi Germany to get support for a Jewish state in Palestine.

    Remember, the Scofield Bible is really the Untermyer Bible though his name’s not on it.

    • Replies: @Jake
  31. Realist says:
    @Rational

    BRAINWASHING WHITES INTO SELF-EXTERMINATION—THE BIGGEST JEWISH PSYCHOPS IN HISTORY.

    Small brains are easier to wash than large brain. Low IQ Whites are of little use to the White race.

    I think the Judaists are responsible for 90% of this problem, as they control the media and the deep state, which includes our corrupt Judiaciary (even John Roberts, chief of the Supreme Court, has become a lib-barbarian, liar, fraud, writing fake left-wing opinions).

    No, Whites are responsible for allowing this to happen

    About causes, Christianity is the biggest factor in white self-flagellation. It is the only religion that promotes worship of your enemy (the Judaists) that seek your extermination.

    What level of IQ would tolerate that?

    But the gullible Christians worship the evil Judaists, their exterminators as “God’s Chosen People”

    Those would be Evangelicals…Trump has willfully surrounded himself with Evangelicals and Jews…Trump is a Deep State minion.

    • Replies: @Wally
  32. Z-man says:

    Enoch Powell was about 20 years ahead of his estimate which makes him an even greater prognosticator. He was probably also estimating that it would take 15-20 years to reverse the fatal trend.
    Enoch Powell-We who are about to die salute you.
    But I won’t go down without a fight!

  33. Emily says:
    @Vojkan

    I suggest its because of the Russian’s orthodox christianity that Russia is largely escaping this scourge.
    Why Orthodoxy is attacked and disliked by other forms of christianity.
    That it kept its true faith through some 70 years of jewish occupation, control, terror and murder in the jewish imposed Bolshevik USSR.

    • Replies: @fatmanscoop
  34. Jake says:

    It all is part of one war. Each os us either serves the cause of Christ and Christendom or the cause of anti-Christ, which is the cause of Satan.

    Ethnic Jews who do not convert but also do not support, including by silence, the virulent anti-Christ, and anti-white (because Christendom was founded administered by whites), actions and words of Jews are not serving Satan. With this site, Ron Unz delivers blows to Satan.

    Jews could achieve very little in terms of seriously harming white peoples if white peoples did not rebel against Christ and Christendom.

    • Agree: Katrinka
  35. Emily says:
    @Anonymous

    Iran v Iraq?
    On what grounds do you make this claim.
    You surprise me.
    They are both allies of Syria and opposing – all three – the illegal invasion and occupation of the USA and its jewish masters.

    • Agree: Alfred
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    , @Alfred
  36. In his book, Inventing the Flat Earth, Jeffrey Burton Russell sets out to disprove the argument medieval Christians were convinced the Earth was flat. History can be a great service: it can also be dangerous, as the state of the world today shows. So it important we strive to see the devils in ourselves and the angels in others – before it’s too late.
    https://www.ghostsofhistory.wordpress.com/

  37. Jake says:
    @Ann Nonny Mouse

    Before America was known for sprouting hordes of ‘splinter’ groups of Protestants, England was known for the same thing.

    Shouldn’t you then wonder how much WASP culture (the ruling, defining culture of English-speaking Protestantism) is certain to produce ever crazy offshoots religiously? If a particular culture keeps producing groups of wild-eyed heretics and crazies, and almost all of them get absorbed and ‘mainstreamed,’ accepted and therefore part of the main culture, isn’t it a given that that culture is itself THE problem?

    Jewishness keeps producing freak and monster groups and movements that do great harm, and I’ll bet you see Jewishness as indispensable to the problem.

    How do you define what is a heretic from Protestantism? Luther, Calvin, Zwingli all declared each other heretical. All Anabaptists declared all non-Anabaptist Protestants heretical. Once it was up and running as an arm of both Crown and Parliament, the Church of England declared every non-Anglican form of Protestantism to be heresy – in any area ruled by the English.

    All of those groups eventually decided to have an uneasy tolerance of each other based on the fact that they all rejected the Catholic Church and Christendom. All quickly realized that Jews were in that camp with them. Over time they also realized that tolerating one another when their doctrines were contradictory in many cases meant they were upholding philosophical relativism that guarantees theological liberalism.

    Anglo-Saxon Puritans were an arch-Judaizing heresy. Archetypal WASP Oliver Cromwell himself made alliance with Jewish bankers to promote his Puritan vision of Protestantism and its politics and cultural development. Isn’t something like a Schofield Bible inherent in WASP culture?

    • Agree: Digital Samizdat, Alfred
    • Replies: @ploni almoni
  38. Jake says:
    @Wood Stove

    To conflate historic Christian teachings and the practices of Christendom with the works of heretics, many having become outright atheists or pagans, is either to be stupid as a stone of to lie knowingly.

    The world today is the end result of a series of rebellions against Christ and Christendom that were kicked off by Martin Luther.

    It is either Christ and Christendom or Chaos that is united only in hating Christ and Christendom, which means hating the descendants of the peoples who built and maintained Christendom: whites.

    You are on the side of Christ-hating Jews and Mohammedans.

    • Replies: @anonymous
  39. Great article. These white liberals are also fundamentally and extremely traitorous, so the language of disloyalty should also be used. This might isolate them, if their ‘alliances’ with those who have been conditioned to be hostile to their white geneology prove unreliable.

  40. @Rational

    Are we supposed to be surprised that Jesus looked Semitic? He was, after all, said to be an actual Israelite, as opposed to the fake ‘Azhkenazic’ Jews who financed and founded modern Isra-hell. (Not that the ancient Israelites themselves were completely unproblematic; just pointing out that they were a separate–and Semitic–people.)

    • Agree: ivan
  41. Emslander says:

    About causes, Christianity is the biggest factor in white self-flagellation. It is the only religion that promotes worship of your enemy (the Judaists) that seek your extermination.

    That is just about the dumbest statement I’ve ever read by a Christ-hating moron. Christians worship only God and have been murdered in every age because of that singularity of worship.

    You need to give up your homosexual lifestyle.

    • Agree: ivan
    • Replies: @anonymous
  42. @Hartnell

    If you don’t see a “right” side that makes you helpless, doesn’t it? That is what you want, isn’t it?

    • Replies: @Hartnell
  43. Rich says:

    It’s a tiny number of Whites who are kneeling and subjecting themselves to humiliations. Probably the same kids who used to give their lunch money up to the school bully without a fight . I work in NYC and live in a nearby suburb, the Whites I speak with aren’t kneeling and have no use for the coloreds. They’re a little too into the “all lives matter ” thing, but since that’s been rejected by the elites, it helps bring them into the correct camp. I’d guess it’s going to get ugly in a lot of places before this latest campaign is over, but I also see a good chance for younger Whites to begin waking up. Today I’m an optimist, tomorrow could be different.

    • Replies: @botazefa
  44. @Rahan

    Out of chaos, order … the new order of the generations.

  45. @Jake

    Jacob, the Scofield Bible subverts Christianity so calling it “inherent” is soft porn. Mohammedans do not hate Christ since they recognize him as a Messiah and await him to strike down the forces of evil. And Untermyer, once slave dealing no longer paid, became a lawyer and blackmailed Woodrow Wilson to have him put a “Talmudist on the Supreme court.” The Talmudist was also the chief Zionist in the US, and a Frankist Shabbatean. Now that’s entertainment!

    • Agree: Ann Nonny Mouse
  46. @Emily

    That it kept its true faith through some 70 years of jewish occupation, control, terror and murder in the jewish imposed Bolshevik USSR.

    Didn’t Stalin purge the “rootless cosmopolitans”? Most Russians seem to have fond memories of Communism from about the 60s onwards, while considering the 1920s-50s Bolshevik version an aberration.

    https://yivoencyclopedia.org/article.aspx/Anticosmopolitan_Campaign

    The onslaught upon Jewish “cosmopolitans” was given wide publicity. It was initiated in mid-December 1948 at the Twelfth Board Plenum of the Writers Union, where Jewish drama critics were depicted as representatives of a “hostile group” striving to conceal “antipatriotic views.” In late January 1949, a Pravda editorial lashed out against these same critics, emissaries of “rootless cosmopolitanism,” to whom the “sentiment of Soviet national pride was foreign” and who sought flaws in patriotic and politically purposeful works. Party criticism, the article laid down, will “smash/crush the bearers of views alien to the people.”

    • Replies: @ploni almoni
  47. Realist says:

    Andrew Joyce, you did it now…the thumpers are after your ass.

  48. Fr. John says:
    @omegabooks

    All of the commenters (and the author) make the PRIMARY error in this column, in thinking that the West (whether Roman, pre-or-post Vatican Eww, or the Protestants) ARE EVEN CHRISTIANS.

    They are not. The Orthodox Churches have, for over a millennium, called the schism of Rome in 1054AD, the ‘First Protestant Reformation’ – and time and again, have said, ‘Rome is no true Church’… just as the Reformers did, for 400+ years! Problem is, most Prots are merely the daughters of the Roman Whore as well, since they hold to the same aberrant theology.

    Having watched Rome self-destruct and self-damn herself over the course of my lifetime (I was the last class to learn the Mass in Latin at my local parochial school), I can without any reservations at all, concur with the Orthodox Saints, Martyrs, Hierarchs, Monastics and holy people who have been killed, tortured, raped, cheated, lied to, etc. by ‘Catholic’ [sic] Christians, in their interactions over the centuries with the Synagogue of Sata—- err, Church of Rome: who were treated as they were, because of the West’s severing from the Vine of the One True Faith.

    Dr Joseph Farrell [PhD. Oxon.] has written a monograph clearly delineating both the philosophical, as well as the theological aberrations of the West, as he notes in his introduction:

    “The basic thesis of these essays is thus that there are Two Europes, Eastern and Western, First and Second respectively, and that both are the effects and consequences of very different and ultimately con-tradictory theological presuppositions and methods. These essays argue that these different and mutually exclusive presuppositions and methods have permeated every facet of legal, social, and cultural conventions. But to say this is to say nothing new, nor terribly original, and certainly nothing terribly upsetting to the “multiculturalist” or “Judeo-Christian Conservative.” The thesis of the Two Europes is explored in these essays from the presupposition that the Western, Second Europe is derivative and aberrant. ‘ – http://www.anthonyflood.com/farrellghdprolegomena.htm

    The West is doing this, PRECISELY because she has allowed her rationalism to overcome her own self-identity as the People of God. And it’s not as though there aren’t Catholic or Protestant laypeople who don’t know the truth- they do.
    https://cambriawillnotyield.com/2020/06/20/the-iniquity-of-negro-worship/

    But it is the Administrations are corrupt, and ripe for judgment. From the sodomite-infected Roman hierarchy, to the utter blasphemy of the head of the SBC, ‘all are corrupt, there is not one that doeth good.’ -as St. Paul said. This era is confirmation of the doctrine of Total Depravity, better than any other witness could have done, to confirm the Pauline commission.

    • Replies: @anonymous
  49. Fr. John says:
    @Rational

    BULLSH*T. Jesus was no more African than I am! Christ is the Last ADAM, and his racial lineage must be pure, unsullied, and non-miscegenated with the detritus of the non-Elect, or His sacrifice is impure, and unacceptable to YHWH God. Anathema sit.

    Jesus was NOT a Jew, as well. As it is defined today.

    https://rense.com/general96/jesusnotjew.html
    https://christogenea.org/podcasts/exactly-why-jesus-christ-not-jew
    https://israelect.com/ChurchOfTrueIsrael/Was-jesus-jewish.html
    https://biblebelievers.org.au/jesusjew.htm
    http://www.jewworldorder.org/jesus-was-not-a-jew/
    http://christianidentityministries.com/kennedy/Jesus_Was_Not_Jewish.pdf

  50. Moi says:
    @Rational

    I hardly recognize America of this genuflect-to-blacks ethos. Never seen a people (whites) turn against their own. This is crazy, but I’m not sure that’s the word for it.

    As for George Floyd, he was afraid of going to prison a again, so he disobeyed the cops, and died from the after effects of a powerful drug overdose (i.e. heart attack)–not because he had a knee on the back of his neck.

    I’m afraid America’s downward slide is accelerating. Sad!

  51. Hartnell says:
    @ploni almoni

    Honestly, I do not care about what happens between Israel and Palestine. It’s none of my business. If they want to blow each other up, fine. What is my concern is when this crap starts hitting Europe, which obviously with the refugee crisis, it is starting too.

  52. Mefobills says:
    @Proud_Srbin

    Byzantine empire kept some of the bronze age injunctions (from Sumer to Babylon) to Jubilee debts.

    In other words, Byzantium was an outpost of the Roman empire, but it also morphed to include a form of jubilee as coded in Isaiah.

    Rome, like today’s west, was a “creditor is always above debtor civilization.” Rome fell due to creditors using their exponentially expanding debts to pry land and life energy from debtors. Rome then polarized into a land owning Feudal elite, who overturned civil society, ultimately causing dark ages.

    Dark ages was the greatest depression, as gold/silver was consecrated to the vaults, while land was locked up into few hands.

    Page 27, Hudson: And forgive them their debts.

    In the Eastern Half of the Empire, Byzantine Emperors made their economy resilient for many centuries by land reform protecting subsistence small holders against creditors and cancelling back taxes, the major category of personal debt.

    Western Christianity enabled Creditor Oligarchy by misinterpreting biblical translation as sin. And forgive them their “debts” is more proper translation, not sin… especially not sexual sin or guilt.

    Perhaps the way forward is to reinterpret the Bible with footnotes, something like what Jews did with Zionist Christianity and their Scofield Bible.

    Footnotes would include instruction on how to interpret what sin is, and the Bible can then be recast properly as a conflict between debt and credit.

    https://michael-hudson.com/2017/12/he-died-for-our-debt-not-our-sins/

    In order to get Western Civilization on track, would be to correct the Bible and Jewish Torah.

    “Sin” is mistranslated and hence the entire meaning of the bible changes. Another mis-translation is in John, it speaks of “word” as if that has any meaning. Logos is the real translation, as E.Michael Jones has explained. “Word means practically nothing, while Logos is pregnant with meaning.”

    Modern day Judaism is of the Pharisees, who were a predatory “creditor class.” Today’s Jews use twisted scripture to justify their “takings.”

    In my opinion, Byzantine empire and Orthodox Christianity did not deviate as far off the path as did Western Christianity.

    Reprinting Bibles with new footnotes, or perhaps using the original language would go a long way toward expatiating false guilt in Christendom. Reprinting would simultaneously remove girders that underpin the logic of predatory creditor oligarchy.

    • Thanks: anon8383892
    • Replies: @Vojkan
  53. Oracle says:

    Our current masters are not God, even though they think they are. Christians have to be reminded that the current masters are in control of this world, but Christ has said fear not for I have overcome the world. We cannot serve two masters, so who will it be God or our current master?

  54. @Hartnell

    Oh, I see. The strategic goal is set the Christians at war with Islam. The Israelis can take care of the Palestinians by themselves.

    • Replies: @anonymous
  55. @fatmanscoop

    The “Rootless Cosmopolitans” purged Stalin with warfarin.

  56. Anonymous[293] • Disclaimer says:
    @Emily

    They are both allies of Syria

    Iran might be happy with an Iraqi alliance, but they might want a straight takeover, also. Apparently Iran has been sponsoring and planning military operations in Iraq. Iran has certainly been providing logistics for these attacks.
    It may be that Iraq will voluntarily join Iran; it may be that Iraq will have to formally invade. It may, for that matter, be that Turkey would object to this increase in Iranian territory and would dispute the increase; Saudi Arabia might dispute it also.
    As usual in the Middle East, there are many possibilities. I believe that Iran intends to take at least part of Iraq, and will have to send in regular military units to do so after the US leaves. If nothing else, the regular units would be needed to make it possible to feed the Iraqi population. You may believe something different, more peaceful with fewer dead people, and, if so, I earnestly hope that your belief is correct.

  57. @Moi

    It is the political, mass media, religious, educational and corporate “leaders” that are the problem.

    They appear to be determined to “lead” us over the cliff.

    All we have to do is–not follow them.

  58. ariadna says:

    Brilliant, scholarly, superbly written, which means… no surprise from this author. Thank you

  59. Anonymous[293] • Disclaimer says:
    @thotmonger

    When oh when will it boomerang?

    2020-2021 is when the cities / urban areas / suburban areas run out of money. That’s what all the fuss is about. Until now, burning down urban areas was a sure fire (note pun) way of getting a budget for rebuilding. Now, probably not — the looming financial failure will reduce national tax base enough to make rebuilding budgets nominal, and at that the urban areas will have to reduce subsidies and have civil service Reductions in Force (RIF). They will howl and scream, but the resources to do otherwise don’t exist, and they’ve already played their major card — riots, CHAD/CHOP/Media offensive with theme “We won the War!” played loudly — and nobody cares. The urban hinterland has been sucked dry.

    So, maybe 2020-2021. We’ll see.

    • Replies: @AriusArmenian
  60. geokat62 says:
    @Rational

    See his photo on Popular Mechanics:

  61. Interesting , but far too long an article.
    Politic correctness has taken any value out of debating an issue. The PC crowd will swiftly and mercilessly hammer you with their preconceived “arguments” and standpoints, slander and flaunt you to public (sic) opinion and the accepted viewpoints of the unwashed masses.
    Your views will be proclaimed “imperialist” or, heaven help you, nationalistic! Any and all debate has been banned, except on a few and far between sites, as this one The Unz.
    This approach is a powder keg, as was it a powder keg, as was the Kerensky government culpable in the event of the Russian Revolution.
    Similarly, the advent of Hitlers grasp of power, was also marred by violent street clashes and intimidation of politic adversaries, later changing to elimination of political adversaries.
    In 1989-1990 Yugoslavia went through the same, fuelled by irresponsible and corrupt politicians, whose only objective it was to enrich themselves and it turned out to be a precursor for general unrest in the Balkans spreading to the ME.
    And where are we now: A USA that behaves like a headless chicken, a Russia that has mostly gone isolationist, a China that is becoming uncomfortably more assertive (and aggressive) and an EU that is totally in cable to agree on anything, but higher taxes and more immigrants.
    And then a virus on top of it all…….

  62. Fox says:
    @Dieter Kief

    I was writing this with no one in mind. I am surprized that it took a mere 3 months of Corona conditioning to bring such primitivity to the fore. It’s not stress or a crisis that caused it – think, for example, of the bombing campaign Germany was subjected to during the war for four years. Order was maintained throughout this existential crisis.
    At the beginning of the Corona time, about three to four months ago, I felt the first time in my life clearly the emanation of ominous, dull, uncontrolled of the Mass as described in Le Bon’s Psychology of the Masses.

    • Replies: @Dieter Kief
  63. Realist says:
    @Moi

    This is crazy, but I’m not sure that’s the word for it.

    Stupidity

  64. geokat62 says:

  65. @Ron Unz:

    This may be part of the reason The Unz Review eclipses The Atlantic. Joyce’s writing is excellent.

  66. This is the most brilliant and most timely article.
    Sadly enough it also proves that US society is doomed and will not recover unless there is a civil war.
    ……………
    God works mysterious ways.

  67. There are 10 movies every year shitting on Christianity, but there are zero movies doing the same to Judaism, ever.

    Christians do get fucked over without the control of the msm n the entertainment industry.

  68. @Rational

    That is why whites must turn to ancient white-centric pre-Christian religions and leave Christianity to escape this extermination.

    The gatekeepers are way ahead of you. Those are ‘raycist’.

    Thor’s Hammer
    https://www.adl.org/education/references/hate-symbols/thors-hammer

  69. @Icy Blast

    Christian Zionism” is an almost exclusively American phenomenon which began to develop and gain momentum around 1800, the same time Mormonism was invented.

    Some American cults have links to the ‘craft’. The founder of Mormonism was a mason which explains the bizarre rituals.

    The same applies to the Seventh Day Adventists.

    • Replies: @ANZ
    , @KevinR
  70. Excellent.

    The “universal brotherhood” Cardinal Vigano warns us about is typified by blindness to mass rape, the abuse of children, murder on a vomit-inducing scale, corruption, avarice, and the cowardly evasion of responsibility everywhere.

    They aren’t entirely blind. Deflection and censorship are much easier.

    You see this on social media and even this site. Each time those unpleasant facts are raised, ad hominem abusive, red herring and other logical fallacies soon follow e.g ‘alt-right’, ‘far-right’, ‘nazi’, ‘Russian bot’ or whites are also pedos.

  71. Having had experience in the Baptist and Catholic branches, I’m familiar with the vices and virtues of Christianity. Mr. Joyce provides informative and elegant articulation to the deleterious effect of Christ worship on American whites. Take off your Christian dog-collar, familiarize yourself with your ancestor gods, and unleash your pagan spirits.

  72. @Fox

    BLM + Muslim Brotherhood = CIA

  73. Vojkan says:
    @Mefobills

    Very interesting comment. Indeed, the Catholics say “forgive us our trespasses, as we forgive those who trespass against us” whereas we say “forgive us our debts, as we forgive our debtors”.

  74. geokat62 says:

    “Farewell Britain,” he got that right. The “thank you” was surely directed at the Board of Deputies for British Jews…

    • Replies: @john nutter
  75. botazefa says:
    @Rich

    It’s a tiny number of Whites who are kneeling and subjecting themselves to humiliations. Probably the same kids who used to give their lunch money up to the school bully without a fight

    I think so, too.

    And I wonder how similar they are to the Occupiers, who are 10 years older now. Gawd, the Occupiers blew a golden opportunity. Same with BLM. With all this energy we should be protesting the oligarchic rule that is suffocating us. I could get on board with that.

    Instead, our youngsters bought into the bullshit nonsense that the US is a racist country. Maybe none of them can spell oligarchy on the protest signs. Morons, all.

    Honestly, I don’t know where you find your optimism.

  76. Joe WEbb says:

    The self -flagellation, exhibit A, is the core of Joyce’s argument and the effective image/symbol of the argument for self-abasing guilt.

    Still, the why of this individualist self-punishment is not clear.

    There are many plausible causes of personal guilt.

    In our case today, the personally felt guilt of Whites for Black failure is center-stage.

    Black Failure is “existentially” the result of about 50 years of experience in reform, compensatory reparations in the form of schooling, welfare, and a thousands of Help projects to uplift Blacks.

    Nothing works. God could not have done this. It must be Whites as well as myself.

    It is inadmissible to Think that God or even Evolution has created race inequality…dramatic inequality.
    This is a thought-crime at a the most elementary level in White psychology, for most Whites.

    How could this be? Unacceptable! Worse than Death, worse than adjusting to personal failure of achieving one’s own goals, or sickness, etc.

    From the theatre of the Absurd, think Waiting for Godot. God…Jesus…please show up!

    Well God, Jesus, etc does not show up, ever.

    It must be me and my various guilty actions. Where is my whip?

    Guilt …slavery…the worst thing….yet somehow the human race hs survived it. How could this be?
    Etc.

    Joe Webb

    • Replies: @Michael McCarthy
  77. @Fox

    dull, uncontrolled of the Mass as described in Le Bon’s Psychology of the Masses.

    – Yeah – the Bad Moon Rising (Creedence Clearwater Revival). Dark vibes; and still spreading, as it seems. George Floyd – Birmingham, Dijon, Stuttgart… – the veil of civilization is thin…

  78. Well, you need to get some ducks in order.

    1. There is no indication that blacks want the kind of power over whites as whites have exercised over blacks.

    2. A demand for equitable treatment may feel like a a demand for power over, but that is mere perception and reinforce the argument that whites occupy sch position of privilege that actually living to the standards required by law are an imposition.

    3. the demographics undermine and suggestion that blacks can overpower whites and tat for the reasons you identify:

    a. “Contemporary Black power in the West, in and of itself, is not self-sustaining but is rather dependent on a vast cultural and legal apparatus that Blacks had little or no role in designing.”

    b. you might want to examine the numbers which are fairly steady for the black population. Blacks are outnumbered by whites by nearly 5x. The demographics alone are staggering. But the history of white dynamics has largely been one of whites leveraging the system against blacks — the history is very clear. And while a a huge section of the created struturation has centered on black citizens, free persons or slaves, that structuration for most of the country’s history was active to undermine black population. Your own advocacy makes the case that black as you incorrectly assess it is not one of blacks over whites.

    4. kneeling has nothing to do with kneeling to black power or blacks, anymore than kneeling in church has anything to do with kneeling to the priest. It is a state of humility to the recognition of something greater in this case that the equity of the system is in question and one can probably guess, that cops, administrators or what have you are willing to make that admission are not based it on Antifa, or BLM, but what they admit by experience, increased knowledge or both and thereby acknowledging correctly or incorrectly their complicity in the perpetuating and benefiting from the system.

    — A Malcolm Little moment when he acknowledged that his animosity against whites was misguided and not the answer in his view.

    —————

    You have many incorrect assessments here —-

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  79. Wally says:
    @Realist

    said:
    “Trump is a Deep State minion.”

    Yep, that explains why the Deep State so desperately wants him out.

  80. Anonymous[293] • Disclaimer says:
    @Rational

    Comments re: https://www.unz.com/comments/all/?commenterfilter=Rational

    Posters here who blame everything on the Jews cannot possibly succeed in doing anything about the problems they cite. Jewish organizations don’t act alone, and have considerably less autonomy than they claim to.

    Jews are great at what they do — their typical occupation has been butchers, cleaning up the failed people from a society. Scouts for Islamic slavers in Spain, bar owners in Russia cheating alcoholics out of their land, loan sharks in the UK bringing down Britons who became desperate enough to “fall into the hands of the Jews” as they saying went as recently as the 1920s, NKVD agents in the USSR, psychiatrists / psychoanalysts / social workers selling worthless “talking cures” to people in trouble and selling psychoactive drugs to psychotics — all butchers. They provide a valuable service, in that they concentrate property from failures and cripples and political opposition that can later be taken from the Jews by the elite they serve. And don’t look at me, I’m not a member of the elite, I run between raindrops as a profession/calling.

    Jews apparently want to be thought of as more than butchers, and claim (in Jewish triumphalist literature) to be secretly running everything. Flatter them on this one point and they sink back into their work: being butchers. The assertions of the old reliable “International Jewish Conspiracy” are simply perceived as flattery by Jews and serve as misdirection for the rest of the population. Jews are supported by the elite as butchers because the elite want butchers, but only at arms length. Nobody invites Jack Ketch to dinner (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jack_Ketch). Actually, I’m sympathetic — Jews have a horrible societal role that has driven them at least half insane.

    So: Joyce is quite correct. Look for the elites that are using the Jewish population, not the Jews only. Jews are minions (c.f. minyan, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minyan, a group of ten righteous men, which is what the Jews wish they were), and as minions could be dispensed with tomorrow should the elites find that necessary. Which the elites might, when the Western urban areas become impossible to supply and the currency becomes almost valueless.

    Attacking the Jews and their various organizations is like being a bull attacking the red cape of a matador (lit: death giver). It’s a waste of time that ends in death from an unanticipated source.

  81. Chew on this from the above article–
    They rejected the authority of priests and clerics, who were regarded by the flagellants as sunk in sin and therefore intrinsic to the problem. The flagellants rejected the Eucharist, asserting that their blood sacrifice was a more authentic communion with Christ. Finally, they revealed their role as populist social revolutionaries by turning against all established elites, including the very wealthy, the nobility, the city leaders and, most interesting of all, the Jews. In fact, everywhere the flagellants went a violent reaction against the Jews followed. In Frankfurt, in July 1349, the flagellants stormed the Jewish neighborhood themselves, and set it on fire. Occasionally, such as in Mainz, when the Jews heard the flagellants were nearing a town or city, the Jews would launch a pre-emptive assault on Christians, with one chronicler reporting the Jews of Mainz slaughtered 200 Christians before the flagellants finally entered and eliminated the Jewish population.
    So who will slaughter whom depends on fabricating of the narrative in the coming days. But a slaughter is certainly slated down the road. Rest in Peace fellow citizens or fight.

  82. botazefa says:
    @Moi

    As for George Floyd, he was afraid of going to prison a again, so he disobeyed the cops, and died from the after effects of a powerful drug overdose (i.e. heart attack)–not because he had a knee on the back of his neck.

    Just a coincidence, right? Jesus, no wonder liberals think we’re a bunch of white trash morons. There’s literally video of him begging for mercy and dying with a cop’s knee on his neck.

    Even if his death was some giant coincidence, the optics are horrible and it is foolish and crazy to argue with what people see with their own eyes.

    Also, there’s that second autopsy that folks who claim the death was caused by fentanyl keep ignoring. That autopsy clearly blames the officers.

    • Replies: @Sollipsist
    , @ploni almoni
  83. Anonymous[293] • Disclaimer says:
    @EliteCommInc.

    1. There is no indication that blacks want the kind of power over whites as whites have exercised over blacks.

    You have a few misconceptions of your own. Want it or not, whether whites have exercised power over Blacks since 1865, the Blacks now have such power. it was given to them by the interpretation and implementation of the 1964 Civil Rights act, perhaps the most evil betrayal in the history of the USA.

    See: Steven Caldwell, _The Age of Entitlement_, 2020/01 for the effect of the 1964 Civil Rights Act.

  84. anon[157] • Disclaimer says:

    Pelosi, the wealthy shabbos goyim

    or,

    flagellants, birds of a feather , status quo, lauding Blacks, piety, incubators, babies, floor, cold, guy in cave defeats NORAD, Silverstein’s air force, moonhoax, sandyhoax, …

  85. Man, Oh man. this article hits hard. My marriage had periods of intense alcohol and drug use (on my part), multiple miscarriages, a stillbirth, foster parenting a severely disturbed young girl, a long stay in an extremely cultish fundamentalist church in Chicago, and the adoption of a medically fragile and profoundly retarded young girl (in my opinion, she’s the best thing that happened to our family).

    We’ve worked through this stuff. I recollect a counselor telling us once, “It seems you’re committed to marriage. I’m just not sure it’s to each other.” My impetus for staying even when things are difficult is that I made a commitment before God, family, and friends that I would not abandon this commitment no matter who or what came along. God be praised, we’ve not had to deal with infidelity which I believe is the only biblical justification for divorce.

    The Missus has drunk deeply from the kool-aid. Part of it is due to her kind and sensitive nature. Another contributing factor is her being in the local public school system as a RN paraprofessional. A discussion group has been started, whether it’s the school district itself or the union I don’t know. This group is reading White Fragility: Why It’s So Hard for White People to Talk About Racism by Robin DiAngelo. She is trying to persuade me to read it.

    I’ve tried to politely tell her I’m not interested in postmodern, critical race theory bullshit. Sometimes our discussions turn into pretty heated arguments. We’ll see where this goes.

    • Replies: @botazefa
  86. @Icy Blast

    “Christian Zionism” is an almost exclusively American phenomenon which began to develop and gain momentum around 1800,

    I think you are off by a couple of hundred years. Puritans were the first “Christian Zionists”, except political Zionism did not exist at the time, and Puritans, to many, were not real Christians. Ten years of Cromwell was enough to put off most Brits, but his hatred of real Christians lingered in his supporters long enough to get more funding from (((Amsterdam))) bankers to launch an invasion by a Dutch goy puppet which led to the creation of the privately owned Bank of England.
    The Stuarts had pushed colonization, to what is now the US, by whoever wanted to go, including the dissenting Puritans and Quakers. Many of the US Founding Fathers had roots in Puritanism. It is ironic that those Founders with Puritan roots blamed the powerless King George rather than the (((Amsterdam))) bankers who removed the Stuarts to put their man Billy on the throne. Had the Stuarts remained, there would have been no Bank of England, and no banishing of competing colonial scrip.

  87. @geokat62

    as statues of the Anglo Saxon fall under the weight of black mobs, a satisfied rat deserts the sinking ship.

  88. @Blankaerd

    Yes, a good article overall, but in line with your correction, the context of the whip hand was that everything was being done to provide an advantage to the Black man in all areas of society.
    While I agree that the Black man does not literally hold the whip, all he has to do is snap his fingers to have the whip willingly cracked by those who do hold it. It may not be ownership of the whip, but the service is excellent.

  89. @Anonymous

    The US is certainly being advanced by all sides into the Third World.
    America looks like a hybrid of Stephen King, Mad Max, Brave New World, and 1984.

    Blacks are making the same mistakes over again this time following BLM that that is bending its knee to the DNC with more of the same virtue narratives from the rich and powerful that will continue their plowing and plundering neoliberal turbo capitalism.
    After the election the hammer will come down and the elites will fully return to the serious business of the continuing ripoff of main street.
    Hybrid war and color revolution has come home to stroking chaos in America – if white people would only wake up to cut military spending, bring the troops home, and invest in the infrastructures to support the people.

    America is a ship of fools.

    • Agree: Ghan-buri-Ghan
  90. schrub says:

    While all that “gates” (Russia-gate, Covid19-gate, and now Race riot-gate) were occurring, did anyone wonder just once what our supposed compatriot, US Senator Rand Paul, was up to?

    Apparently not much. His silence on the unfolding events has been overwhelming. No angry newspaper articles coming from him critiquing evolving events. No appearances on influential media outlets Tucker Carlson’s TV program or Joe Rogan’s very influential podcast despite the fact that he would have probably been warmly welcomed on either without any sort of censoring or selective editing like the regular MSM is prone to do. All he had to do was request an appearance. He apparently didn’t.

    I am on his Senate mailing list and just received his latest newsletter. What does he write about considering the monumental events that have been unfolding?

    Almost nothing. The newsletter is sparse indeed.

    He does mention Covid19 fleetingly but doesn’t mention any of the effects that its “campaign” has had on both our civil right and on our economy. Apparently he supported the campaign and the lock downs or, if he did not , he has been silent about his positions.

    “Race riot-gate” isn’t mentioned at all in this newsletter. Not one word. He does write, however, that he apparently supports the new faux holiday Juneteenth without any explanation as to why.

    Apparently Rand is suffering an increasingly severe case of “Potomac Fever” and is doing everything possible to guarantee his reelection chances by not saying anything that is even slightly controversial. His father he definitely isn’t.

    • Agree: Bro43rd
  91. XiO says:

    This is worth a read.

    When the trials for White Genocide begin, do not forget to punish the non-Jews.

    I’ve noticed that many writers and content creators on the dissident right and even the mainstream right giving warnings about not overreacting and suggesting basically getting in a defensive posture; get your families out of danger areas, increase your supplies of spam and baked beans, water, a generator, extra supply of medications, do your jumping-jacks, etc.

    [MORE]

    This is sagacious advice; but while these folks suggest actions for the safety of your body and the soundness of your mind, I write this to prepare your soul. I prepare your gut for the punch that is about to come. I’m not going to tell you something pretty here.

    The late Bob Whitaker said before he died to not let the non-Jews off for their role in White Genocide. He was very adamant about this. For years, I though these ‘non-Jews’ meant the WASP Eastern Establishment in the United States and Anglo elites in the UK; some sort of Illuminati organization. After further examination of this issue, I’ve come to see the error in my thinking. While the WASPS, on both sides of the water, are contributors to White genocide, I don’t think they were the originators. I especially believe this about the WASPs in America; their foundation money may be involved now, but they were at the forefront of immigration restriction, eugenics, abortion and opposed American involvement in both world wars. The WASP elites in America and the UK were just outmaneuvered by a more ancient, and socially sophisticated outfit.

    The true “non-Jews” behind White genocide have been liars from the beginning; the organization that’s been partners with the Jews for centuries, actors that fight via deception and active measures, that hide in plain sight; this hidden enemy is, of course, the Church of Rome; and by now, the whole of organized Christianity. The Jews are just part of the team.

    I told you this wouldn’t be easy. It broke my heart when I saw the light. If I was Michael Corleone, then the Church would be Fredo.

    You must understand that our enemies are masters of soft power, but maybe more importantly, masters of sexual degeneracy. The recent 3-part series at Counter Currents by James O’Meara is a good place to start to understand sex and the Church, but it doesn’t go far enough.

    We know that religions maintain power by controlling the people’s minds with stories, symbols, and rites. This is how they control the masses. But they also have to control the people that control the levers of power and they do this most effectively with blackmail. They find people to blackmail by setting up compromising situations; usually sexual.

    The Jews, of course, were and are the front for vice. For most of Christian history in Europe, you’d go to the Jewish quarter of town to get a whore. Maybe someone inquires a little and finds out you like males. You figure, who’s going to believe the “Christ killing, perfidious Jews” if they spoke about it? Then you find out later that actually people from the Church were witnesses to your secret sex. Being accused of adultery would have been a problem for a common man throughout Euro-Christian history, but sodomites were treated very, very poorly (to put it in a Trumpian way).

    You see, the Church doesn’t actually run or own the whore house in the Jewish quarter of town. They’re Christians, thus they are “nice people” and “very good,” so they would never do that. However, they’ll happily collect a tax on the down-low from the Jews, but more importantly, use the arrangement for compromise operations. The mafia later became useful for these same operations. Think about who runs the classic scum part of town in big American cities; peepshows, strip clubs, porn shops, call girls, call boys; it’s the mob or Jews. The gay section of cities, especially in large Northeastern cities, would have deep connections to an organization which is 50-75% homosexual.

    People wonder why the Jews were tolerated in the middle ages, well now think about why the mafia have been tolerated by the Church. Part of the ceremony for becoming “made” in the mafia involves burning a card of a saint in your hand. Why would these “very good” and “nice people” from the Church not be outraged that their demi-gods (Saints) were being misappropriated by a criminal organization? Papa Francisco is actually harder on the Mob than any Pope before him. The various Mexican and Latino gangs probably act in the same way as the Italian Mob; very likely Cartels have to pay some tax on the down-low as well.

    The reason the Abrahamic religions have such harsh judgments on homosexuality, is because by making homosexuality punishable by death or extreme humiliation, you have a cadre of people that you can control by setting up compromise operations. There will always be some small part of the population with same sex attraction; they know this. The controllers of the Western world have been studying human psychology for centuries. The sacrament of “Confession” was a perfect laboratory for the Church to learn about human psychology, but also again, learn compromising information that could later be used to set up compromising situations. This is why security clearances for intelligence agencies always include questions of past sexual behavior. They know that the faggot you don’t know is more dangerous than the faggot you do know. I’ll discuss the subject of Dangerous Faggots later.

    If you ever wondered why all the congresspeople folded on every so called “civil rights” issue against Whites since WWII, you have the answer, they were compromised. Every Congressperson and Senator has to live part of the time in Washington DC. What a perfect place to run compromise operations; all these powerful people in one place; probably been going on there for a long time. Why would Abraham Lincoln start a war that could have been worked out, under the impression that he’d be sending the black slaves back to Africa, only to be whacked, thus never getting the opportunity to repatriate the former slaves? There’s a reason why the gay republicans have Lincoln as their Saint; Lincoln was likely gay and compromised, as was likely his thespian killer. I wonder who might have wanted Africans to remain in the country? There’s no question they were used in the time of reconstruction in the same ways non-Whites are used today; as a revolutionary vanguard against the White population. By the way, general Sherman was Catholic.

    Ever wonder why American foreign policy is run from Georgetown University? If the Jews run America, why Georgetown?

    Why is the Supreme court 6 to 3 Catholic to Jewish? Not one born and raised protestant on the court in the United States of America?

    Why is the CIA referred to as “Catholics in Action?” Former CIA man, and closet homosexual, William F. Buckley started National Review and kicked out all the America first right wingers.

    Why do the people in the heights of power (Left or Right), push forced mass immigration and forced assimilation? George W. Shrub, and his brother Jeb are open borders Cuckseratives. Jeb converted to Catholicism and married a Mexican woman. Why would a man from one of the most powerful families in America, who would have the pick of the litter as far as women, marry a Mexican woman of such low social class?

    We know about all the Jews in the heights of power in America, but are you familiar with the Knights of Malta? Go read the membership lists of this organization. Notice that these knights include Jews. Does being a Jewish Knight of Malta make you better than just a plain Jew? Somebody ask the Logos rising crew? How many members of the Supreme Court are members?

    What the Church wants to do is bring Whites back into the Catholic fold. Back us into the sheep pen that is Christianity; specifically, under the Roman Church, with the Jews as their longtime teammates. The Jews were always allowed to “survive but not thrive.” But Euro-folk religious practitioners were wiped from the planet as were the sacred groves. European pagans were slaughtered while the Jews were allowed to run vice and loan shark operations. Then, when the masses would react to Jewish vice with an anti-Jewish pogrom, the Church would come in a put it down.

    Besides flooding the US with Latin American migrants, it appears the strategy is making life so unbearable that you see the Church as the only option. The trannies in the bathroom, trannies reading to kids, sexualization of kids, disorder on the streets, profanity; all of this is being carried out by political leaders that are compromised or ideologically programmed by institutions that were staffed by the compromised.
    All the mainline Protestant Churches are fully SJW, but the Catholic Church remains true to the traditional family. Compared to what we see now, the Catholic Church’s order would be a relief. But this order will come with a price and this price is open borders with Mexico and all of Latin America; race mixing with the world, because all are “one in Christ.”

    The real reason for Vatican II, and the “opening up of the church,” was to better infiltrate and corrupt the mainline protestants. Bring them into their network, compromise people, then put these people in place to make these Churches lose all legitimacy; lesbian-trans bishops, the whole catalog. Vatican II was not the work of Jewish infiltration; it was a loosening magical operation to expand networks with a future plan to bind these networks back to the Church. The Catholic dominated Supreme Court does all they can to bring in immigrants, but what perplexes people is why they hold up laws that expand LGBTQ+ rights? It goes back to subversion; they want to cause as much chaos as possible so they can be the ones that bring the New Order. The Judges will just be blamed on “Americanism” and “liberals.”

    The Jewish-Church alliance is really off schedule. The longer-term plan was to flood America with Latin American migrants over a longer period of time; maybe 50 years. The plan was to create the “Kingdom of Guadalupe” in Western hemisphere, turn Europe into a shithole, with government supported Muslims against rebel White Nationalists in something that will look like 90’s era Balkan Wars; then bring over the Kingdom’s troops, under the command of Jeb Shrub’s son or grandson, to re-Catholicize the whole Western World. This is probably why Europe never spends much on their military budgets. They were supposed to be weak militarily, so the Kingdom’s troops would have an easier time. Something threw off their plan, and forced them to speed it up.

    White identity politics are growing. And the Church sees this as the biggest threat to their New World Order. They have to discredit the movement against White genocide, but more importantly, the very concept of White identity itself. The Jewish-Church alliance wants to provoke a reaction from Whites so they can frame the discourse going forward as “see, both the radical left post modernists, and the neo-Nazi White supremacists are the same, we all must be Christian now, because Logos or something.”

    A quick aside, the Church calls itself the organization of Logos, THERE’S JUST ONE PROBLEM! If you claim that the Garden of Eden, Noah’s ark, Resurrection, Assumption, etc. are real events, you can’t be the organization of Logos. Just because the author of the Gospel of John claims Jesus of Nazareth is Logos, doesn’t mean anything. In fact, if ‘reason’ is one of the definitions of Logos, then we can use Logos to discredit the organization that claims it as 1/3 of its god.

    The Church is truly the enemy that fights via deception. Stalin was a moron; his rhetorical question about “how many divisions does the Pope command” was moronic. If it was all about armies and guns, why did Stalin bring back the Orthodox Church in Russia during the second world war? We can expect the Church to use pageantry and provocation. This provocation will come from outside, and inside the dissident right.
    From outside, anti-whiteness is going increase. Looting and attacks on Whites will continue. The hubris of the anti-whites (especially BLM) is going to go into overdrive. These are people with little rationality, lots of resentment and very little foresight.

    You can expect the debasing of White people and virtue signaling to reach heights never imaginable. You should expect women (and probably some men) to start sucking cock for “black lives;” ten-on-one gangbanging for black lives; swallowing excrement for black lives; aborting your children to atone for white privilege; and probably the rise of suicide cults that , for example, jump off cliffs holding hands to “remove whiteness from the world.”
    This is all to get you to feel like there’s no hope. Your mind changes when under stress. This is why military units train by doing the same simple tasks over and over; when you feel you’re in mortal danger, chemicals are produced that cause you to not think rationally and just react. This is what the images on your television are meant to do to you. They want you to either submit to anti-whiteness or do something stupid. DON’T DO EITHER!!!

    From the inside you will have continued efforts by bad actors encouraging people to commit acts of violence and/or destruction. These are people trying to push the idea that damaging critical infrastructure and committing terrorist attacks will somehow bring a trillion-dollar military-intelligence-industrial-media complex to the negotiating table. These bad actors in the dissident right are going to use the debasing and virtue singling explained above to belittle you and provoke you. They’ll accuse you of being a “cuck” and insinuate that you want to see your daughter get “triple penetrated by Tyrone and his bros.” The main provocateurs will be White Isis Guru Count Dotrouble of Provocation Inc. and his henchman toady John “Multi-Level” Marketeer; you can expect them to be very active in their provocation operations in the coming days. A key rule of thumb, if someone is asking you to act like BLM or Antifa, then their either stupid, or a bad actor. I don’t think these guys are stupid.

    The enemies of Whiteness would love nothing more for some “White Supremist Neo Nazi Isis Satanists thatwanttokillsixmillionjews” take over a little space and play “White Afghanistan” for a few weeks in some mountainous areas of the US. This would allow the enemy to rally the country in a show of anti-white solidarity. The Jewish-Church alliance would love nothing more than for the power to get knocked out in some major city so they can have the American version of Syria’s “Dust Boy.” How about, “New York Giants Girl.” I’m thinking an 8 year old African American girl wearing one of those 1990’s Starter Jackets, in the Giants colors Blue, Red, and White; her grandma died when the building’s heat went out, due to the attacks (actually the money was stolen by her knucklehead grandson but whatever); she’s seen on TV warming her hands by one of those barrel fires, with her hood on, while inquiring to the TV man “why da waycists hate us for ah skin?” This author starts to tear up as I write this, so I’ll leave it at that but you get the picture.
    After critical infrastructure is hit, I expect some kind of multiracial Infrastructure Guard Force to be formed; which would begin with 2 months of anti-white training, with co-ed dormitories I would presume. All the people with any connection to White Positive Websites will likely be arrested, and placed on house arrest with ankle bracelets. Many of these people will say anything the police tell them to say, allowing the anti-white authorities to craft a “vast, rightwing conspiracy.”

    You can expect all the mind controlled, active shooter types to go into action at this time as well. Shooters, like the one in Australia, are almost guaranteed to be mind-controlled. But here again the origin of their becoming a mass shooter will likely be that they got caught doing something sexually immoral, and then abused over a period of time, in a way that made them more mailable to carrying out such a task. The Australian shooter likely was caught banging children in the Middle East, which probably has honey trap operations in every major city, on the behest of Western and/or Israeli intelligence (probably Russians too). The Atomwussen gangs and all the other poor fucks they have on ice primed for mass shootings will be ready to go.

    Expect the “White Nationalist Neo Nazi Satanic killers” to be traced back to Russia, maybe Antifa as well. Last year at this time the radio was putting out memes of “White Isis” and fear mongering about terrorist attacks. I expect them to pick up this year with the same message. When the George Floyd riots started, they were trying to push the “White Nationalists behind the riots” narrative and even threw some “Russia involvement” in for good measure. I know many people on the dissident right think Russia are the “good guys,” but understand that there are anti-white elements inside Russian intelligence that will leak information showing “proof” of a Russia connection. Not all of Russia is “our friend,” as was chanted during the Charlottesville Rally. Also keep in mind that the Orthodox Church would gladly receive non-White Orthodox Christians into Russia.

    Based on my analysis of the connections between certain actors in White Nationalism, this is how I see it going down. Andy Nowhitey and King Richard both started the original Alturdudive Right blog. They had a split because Nowhitey and King Richard disagreed on Christianity. Nowhitey was really disturbed about King Richard’s views on abortion. After the hail-gate event, Nowhitey’s new Alturdudive-Right II site was the first to denounce King Richard, saying that King Richard is not the Party, and the Party is not King Richard. It’s still not been verified if Nowhitey is connected to the Arch Prior of St. Latrobe Priory.

    Like I said, this wasn’t going to be pretty, you can turn back now but I’m going to continue.

    I expect audio and video will be “leaked” by the person who calls himself the “Dangerous Faggot,” who happens to be another person likely compromised sexually, and who is also likely an agent of the Church. The footage will show some big names in White Nationalism: King Richard, Dr “Big” Johnson, Bronze Aged Perverter, Millennial Hoes, Jim Gold, Greg Candy, Marcus “Hannibal” Bramis, Invictus Caesar, etc. sacrificing goats to Satan, using the blood for lube while sodomizing each other, Triumph of the Will playing on the screen and mounds of coke and bourbon bottles scattered about; all the while with said White Nationalists cursing Jesus, Mary, and Joseph, and screaming “POWERRRRRRRRRRR.” Expect the worst story you can imagine. I like and admire most of the people I mentioned here, but you have to understand that Whiteness is the biggest obstacle to the Jewish-Church New World Order.

    They have to do something, and sex and pageantry are their specialties.

    The Alturdudive Right and other “Logos Rising” crew members will be in full force saying “see, see White Nationalism is really just a bunch of homos who want to put the peepee in the poopoo” and that “you must become Christian or you’re either a Jew or homo.” After this recording is “leaked” you’ll see many of these White Nationalists become Christians. They will form a chorus together and sing songs like “All Are Welcome! All are Welcome! All are welcome in this place”

    But they won’t be done there, this next part is critical. The Church has a history of big “spiritual events;” especially Marion apparitions. You might look into the last major Marion apparition “Our Lady of Fatima.” Here we have young girls that supposedly experience a visitation from the Virgin Mary, who tells them a message and to prepare for a sign on October 13th 1917. This would be a very simple operation. Bring a beautiful woman from South America that speaks Portuguese and have her play the part of Mary to the girls. Later during the light show, use some sort of technology creating an optical illusion. If you look at the footage of the light during the light show, it doesn’t look like a person, it’s just a ball of light. But because “Mary” said it would be there, at that time, the faithful masses were mystified. This event is evidence that the Church will use technology and pageantry to support their program. Technology has greatly improved since 1917, so you can expect the Church to be ready with something impressive. If Jesus, Mary, and Joseph show up and call for White Genocide, remember that the Church has a history of such events.

    But the Church has a serious decision to make regarding the new apparition. If they do it, and it goes bad, then the gig is truly up. I mean, if they try a new “Our Lady at ________,” and people see through it, then Christianity will truly be discredited. At very least, the Roman Catholic Church will be discredited.

    But it might not be a botched apparition that will discredit them but having a secret recording of themselves released. Imagine a recording from within the bowels of the Vatican that would make the White Nationalist “secret recording” look and sound like an Easter egg hunt.

    If the Church is peopled primarily by homosexuals, you can expect them to be highly comprised from outside the Church as well. If a video surfaces showing Cardinals or even higher boy fucking (or worse), then it will be all over for the Vatican. It could be that the Church’s greatest weapon, sexual degeneracy, might be that which brings them down. An organization filled with homosexuals, that are supposed to be paragons of virtue, would be quite easy to compromise. Perhaps Papa Benedictus’ departure was the result of being compromised?

    The Southern American center of the conspiracy in the US is Texas. It’s not a mistake that the Shrub family hails from there. The Shrubs are the connection in America between Church and the Crown in the UK. Texas would be another ideal place to have blackmail operations, oil men and the like; Texas has a long-standing Catholic presence. This is what might explain why Crazy Alex was found having tranny-porn on his phone. I expect Crazy Alex to be a key player in hyping any Christian apparitions. I had to spend time in Texas for business, I can feel anti-white evil flowing through the place.

    But wait, it get worse, as I mentioned above, the Shrubs are corrected to the Church AND the UK Royals; and it is here where we find the 3rd person of the anti-White Unholy Trinity. Ever wonder why Britain fought in two World Wars against Germany, giving up their empire in the process, while gaining nothing but dead British men?

    It’s easy, they were offered something bigger. They likely gave up their empire, to gain half the world. These are people that make plans in the hundreds of years. Giving up the empire in the 1940’s and gaining the new Holy Roman Empire in 2040 is a bold, but understandable plan of action. This is the second group of non-Jews that must be brought to justice for White genocide. Her Majesty does nothing as young British girls are raped and pimped on an industrial scale. If Her Majesty wanted to, she could end all immigration to the UK with a word. Don’t forget that the Shrubs are related to Her Majesty. Like the Church, don’t be surprised if someone has video of people in the Royal Families doing some heinous stuff too. At least one member, at the very least, hung out at the Magic Egyptian Island of Mr. Epsensaltstein. This tripartite conspiracy would cover the major roles of Indo-European society:

    1) The Priest class (Church of Rome); 2) The Crown (focused on the British and other Euro Royals but also includes elite families in the US like the Shrubs); 3) Merchants (Jews).

    Some of a Masonic bent might stand up and say, “that right, that’s why we smash Crown and Altar and why we, in the higher degrees, reject Christ and serve the Lord of Light, Lucifer.” As bad as Christianity is going to look, and as discredited as it will be, don’t fall for this either. The Center of Anglo-American Freemasonry is the British Royal family.

    I suspect besides disturbing sexual recordings, that there will be signed documents and probably recordings of all these parties agreeing to White Genocide; explicitly, and with great pleasure, on whatever important parchments that the Vatican uses, lambskin perhaps, written in blood. I expect these kinds of recorded conversations and documents to be signed by not only these major parties, but also many major media personalities, business tycoons, entertainers, and academics.

    Bob Whitaker said after 9-11 that no one would have to worry about anyone denying the next holocaust since it would be on CNN. The Church won’t have to worry about Saint Peter’s getting dustified from above when it will likely be the former faithful, bringing it down with hammer, ax, and torch.

    This is where Papa Francisco comes in. I believe Francisco will be the one to close up the Vatican and end the centuries long conspiracy; literally living the role of “Last Pope.” He knows about all the sex and White genocide stuff. He might be the one that has to sign off on any apparitions and he is much less likely to do so than Papa Benedictus was. It might be Papa Francisco that saves the Church from total dustification by coming clean with the whole program and then ending the Papacy. Francisco will just be the Bishop of Rome. Since the Roman Church will be totally discredited, you’ll probably see what’s left get absorbed by the Orthodox. They’ll blame it all on the Franks, and the Jews too of course. In America Protestant Christianity will live on as the primitive Church, small groups of people meeting in their homes. The vast majority of Whites will move into a new Symbolic Organizing Principle.

    Don’t be surprised if the dreaded Juden redeem themselves as this thing unravels. You see, the Jews have existed longer than the Church, and if they have to make a deal when faced with destruction, Jews will make a deal. If they have to provide some of these special parchment documents and recordings of White Genocide soirees with White children being sacrificed; they’ll do it when facing the dusty void. I realized from learning about Jewish-Church relations that the Jews are only part of a system that makes them vice peddlers. I’m pretty sure serious, pious Jews don’t care much for pornographers. I suspect the Jewish whorehouse operator throughout history was probably the scum among the Jews as well; but also likely compromised by an internal Jewish compromise operation. The Jews will be freed from their role in the Jewish-Church alliance, thus allowing them to revert back to a more primitive time as well. Their role as major power player in the White world will diminish. For any number of Jews punished for White genocide, I propose that double the non-Jews receive punishment.

    In America, I expect elements from the old WASP families to regain control. When I read Byron Tully’s “Old Money Book,” I realized that there was no way that these people would capitulate completely. Like all Germanic peoples, they are very patient and out-of-the-box thinkers. They control their appetites and have more discipline than Jews or Latins. They also have less need to display their wealth. It might come down to the group that could controls their passions the best; they ride the goat; they don’t drink its blood.

    Bob Whitaker said that the Shrubs were evil, and I don’t doubt this. We know that King Richard is connected to this family; many on the dissident right suspect him of being the center of the conspiracy to discredit White identity and this writing proves, so far, that I do as well. But I would ask you dear reader to read the Saga of the Volsungs. In it, you will learn that Germanic people will go to the greatest of lengths to get revenge on those who do them wrong. King Richard might be on tape getting pozzed with goat’s blood; or doing the pozzing as he initiates people, during the ritual for the final degree of the Apollo Cult. But that’s because he was the WASP’s man on the inside. That’s right; the Jewish-Church conspiracy thought King Richard was their fool, since he was introduced to them by the Shrubs, but he was the WASPs undercover man the whole time and he knows everything! And before people laugh at him for getting pozzed, go watch the FX show “The Americans.” In it you’ll see that deep cover operators actually get trained in being pozzed.

    King Richard sounded very unhinged during the secret recording leaked by the Dangerous Faggot. He said he was a “king,” and that he would “ritually humiliate” the people responsible for the Charlottesville disaster. What if was telling the truth? I’m saying, what if King Richard was telling the world exactly what was going to happen once White Genocide has ended? Can you imagine the rage that must be inside him from all that ass pozzing. And if that’s what he had to do for his people and for the struggle against White geocide, won’t he then deserve to be King? Some people have podcasts, or write articles, but getting ass pozzed for White wellbeing is going above-and-beyond.

    Now what about the Dangerous Faggot? The “leaky” one specifically, will likely be charged for his part in the conspiracy against White wellbeing, but for homosexuals in general, the answer is to remove them from the closet. Homosexuality will not be illegal; it’s better to know who the homos are. If you want to get or be pozzed, that’s OK; you just can’t promote pro-gay propaganda. No one has the right to harass or assault homosexuals. Life it difficult, if you need a same-sex life partner, that should be a legally recognized union, but it will not be on the same level as unions between men and women. The prick going into the snatch in sacred; we’re all here today because the prick went in the snatch. This solution will remove the Jewish-Church’s greatest weapon. They want to present this issue as a choice between the current sexual insanity and what the Church advocates. The solution I presented turns Dangerous Faggots into just faggots. And that’s better for everyone.

    I very much hope this writing gets wide circulation; you must prepare to see everything you trusted and thought holy to be corrupted. The Abrahamic, Yahwehian order is coming to an end; the pillars of their temple crashed to the ground.

    I beg you, White brothers and sisters, remain calm, don’t do anything stupid, but also remain strong in the face of the coming anti-Whiteness. While the era of Yahweh is coming to an end, the White Father, which art in heaven, is watching. He’s watching social media to see who will ingratiate themselves, and abuse their own children in the name of anti-whiteness in order to improve their social position. He’s watching to see who will be provoked into doing something stupid. He’s watching to see who is pro-White and who is anti-White; he has a list and he updates it often. Everything people put on their social media, everything said on the news, every email, every phone call, he has records of all of it. That way when the tide turns at his arrival, he’ll know if you’re genuine or not. When #CuckerTarlson tells viewers that “bending the knee will not be rewarded,” he’s not just posturing; he’s giving his viewers practical advice.

    The White Father is coming back. His Yuletide ritual and veneration reminds us of this. Don’t be on his naughty list.

    • Troll: Corvinus
    • Replies: @Anonymous
  92. ANZ says:
    @Amerimutt Golems

    Interesting connection. Thanks.

    Temples, secret names, golden plates and magic translator stones make much more sense now. Special undies too.

  93. Being forced to kneel to militant black thugs, and relinquish control of public and private lands to white anarchists while their financial supporters are given immunity by the usual (((cast and crew))) will not end well.
    There’s a calling in the wind, a gathering storm, and it’s fury is backed by the wrath of armed silent warriors no more.
    We have witnessed their destruction, and now they will experience organized patriots delivering justice where justice failed us.
    We kneel before no one, not even God.

    • Replies: @botazefa
  94. @Alfred

    Fr Brian Houghton, a convert and a traditionalist Catholic priest of great merit and brilliant literary gifts, was a graduate of Stowe.

    He was very important in my life as both a writer and, later, a close friend.

    He, born into that class system, was both the epitome of an English gentleman and a trenchant critic of that systems (lack of) morals.

    • Thanks: Alfred
  95. “I found Cardinal Carlo Vigano’s recent letter to Donald Trump on current events to be extremely timely. It’s obvious from the letter, and from his history of activism against Pope Francis, abortion, and the homosexual network at the Vatican,”

    “Cardinal” Vigano is an archbishop. Since he has always dreamed of the cardinate, I’m sure he’ll be pleased by your precipitous promotion. It no doubt reflects your gratitude for his letter to Trump, which supplies you with some supposed data on the Vatican.

    Some of us, however, know the full, sad story of Archbishop Vigano. When Francis failed to elevate him, and in fact demoted and transferred him, the spiteful man issued a supposed “expose” of the Vatican, the so-called Testimonia. This was initially welcomed by the far-right (such as yourself) but enthusiasm quickly cooled when it was realized that Vigano had “outed” many conservatives of the John Paul and Benedict era.

    The truth of the Vatican is not that “the homos took over”; they took over centuries ago, and they are the leading conservatives today (no doubt including your Vigano). As the Polish proverb says, They always accuse YOU of what THEY are doing. Those who care more for the Church than for scoring points against fags know Vigano as an enemy within.

    “Viganò’s second error, the more serious in strategic terms for the durability of his ‘testimony’, was that of ‘outing’ major cardinals who were close to Francis (Parolin, Becciu), but also those who helped to lead the pontificates of John Paul II (Sodano, Sandri, Martino) and Benedict XVI (Bertone, Mamberti). Certainly, anyone familiar with the history of the Vatican knew that the source of the McCarrick affair lay in disturbances orchestrated under the pontificate of John Paul II: by writing it down, however the nuncio deprived himself of much of his support among conservatives. More impulsive than strategic, Viganò blindly took his revenge by ‘outing’ everybody he didn’t like, without a plan or a tactic, while his word alone was sufficient proof to denounce the homosexuality of his colleagues–for example the Jesuits, who were considered largely to be ‘deviants’ (meaning homosexuals)! In accusing everyone except himself, Viganò magnificently, and inadvertently, revealed that the theology of fundamentalists can also be a sublimation of homosexuality. That was how Viganò managed to lose his allies: however critical it might have been, the right wing of the Vatican could not allow doubt to be cast on the previous pontificates of John Paul II and Benedict XVI. By targeting Angelo Sodano and Leonardo Sandri (even though, strangely, he spared Cardinals Giovanni Battista Re, Jean-Louis Tauran and, most importantly, Stanisław Dziwisz), Viganò committed a major strategic mistake, whether his accusations were true or not. The far right of the Church, which initially supported the nuncio and defended his credibility, quickly understood the trap. After an initial thunderous outburst, Cardinal Burke fell silent, outraged in the end that the name of his close friend, the ultra-conservative Renato Martino, appeared in the letter (Burke validated a press communiqué written by Benjamin Harnwell, which firmly contested the idea that Martino might be part of the ‘homosexual current’–without supplying evidence, of course). Likewise, Georg Gänswein, the closest collaborator of the retired pope Benedict XVI, was careful not to confirm the letter, whatever the cost. For conservatives, lending credence to Viganò’s testament meant shooting themselves in the foot, while at the same time risking involvement in a civil war where any means were permitted. There are probably more closeted homosexuals on the right than on the left of the Church, and the boomerang effect would be devastating.”

    — In the Closet of the Vatican: Power, Homosexuality, Hypocrisy by Frédéric Martel; see my recent three-part review at Counter-Currents.com

  96. anon[191] • Disclaimer says:

    The author shouldn’t assume every reader is familiar with the Morant Bay rebellion and has read Professor McDonald’s article. A brief explanation as to what it was would be in order, otherwise, one has to look it up and this makes it a hassle to get back into the article.

  97. botazefa says:
    @Enemy of Earth

    We’ll see where this goes.

    Women are socially vulnerable and social media punishes women who don’t support mainstream ideas set by elite women such as Kim Kardashian.

    Insofar as Kim’s primary concern is the interaction between police and angry or mentally ill black men, all women are socially bound to take the anti-racist viewpoint or risk being ostracized.

  98. Ahoy says:

    Ιn 1917 Trotsky drove a spear through the heart of an already dead Tsar Nicolas. Symbolism.
    WE KILLED YOUR GOD. WE KILLED CHRISTIANITY.

    One hundred years later this

    http://com/wahttps://www.youtubetch?v=jjkuti_HmFU&feature=emb_logo

    Americans have a choice. Either they turn the statue of Satan in front of the Capitol building in Little Rock to dust and return to God or prepare for more freedom like the eight square blocks in Seattle.

    GOD ALWAYS WINS.

    • Replies: @geokat62
  99. Agent76 says:

    May 25, 2017 The Death Wish of the Anarcho-Communists (by Murray Rothbard)

    Murray Rothbard explains why anarcho-communism is an all-out assault on individuality and on reason, and is an economic absurdity.

    Mar 19, 2013 Pope Francis and the Dirty War – Michel Chossudovsky

    Professor Michel Chossudovsky of the Centre for Research on Globalization are pointing out, Bergoglio’s past points to his likely involvement in crimes against humanity.

    Why Roman Catholicism is Not Christianity

    Don’t Get Upset… This collection of articles is not a “slam” against individual Catholics, but against a “system” that claims to be based upon the authority of the Bible. If Roman Catholicism were a system of beliefs based upon the Bible, then with an open Bible, that system should be able to stand up to examination FROM the Bible.

    http://www.biblebc.com/Roman%20Catholicism/roman_cath_main.htm

  100. botazefa says:
    @CelestiaQuesta

    Being forced to kneel to militant black thugs

    We’d all be better off ditching the histrionics.

    There’s scary stuff aplenty. We don’t neex to be inventing new horrors like the myth of forced kneelings.

    • Replies: @Colin Wright
  101. geokat62 says:
    @Ahoy

    One hundred years later this

    Hey, Ahoy. Your link doesn’t function properly.

  102. @botazefa

    Are you arguing that we should put more faith in what something looks like rather than attempts to find out what it really is?

    Are you also saying that subsequent findings are automatically more trustworthy than initial findings?

    • Replies: @botazefa
  103. So if Jews were evil and therefore troublesome then why were they expelled from one nation to another knowing fully well that the evil couldn’t be reformed and it was simply being let loose on another unsuspecting nation … why weren’t they dealt with severely in the place where they had engaged in evil in the first place? Nip it in the bud, I say!

  104. Ahoy says:

    @geokat62

    Thanks. I try again

  105. Why would I bother reading a piece that contains an inaccuracy in the first sentence? The ‘whip hand’ quote was from one of Powell’s constituents.

  106. @Hartnell

    ‘Honestly, I do not care about what happens between Israel and Palestine. It’s none of my business. If they want to blow each other up, fine. What is my concern is when this crap starts hitting Europe, which obviously with the refugee crisis, it is starting too.’

    And you don’t see any connection between the actions Israel has committed and/or incited and the refugee crisis?

    Syria just kinda spontaneously degenerated into bloody anarchy? No outside influences at all?

  107. @botazefa

    ‘…There’s scary stuff aplenty. We don’t neex to be inventing new horrors like the myth of forced kneelings.’

    That the kneelings are voluntary is hardly encouraging.

    A slave who is forced to kneel may someday revolt. It’s hard to place much hope in a slave who wants to kneel.

    • Replies: @botazefa
  108. Anon[266] • Disclaimer says:

    Part of the problem of Christianity is that it is a religion that was born and spread among oppressed people. Turn The Other Cheek is a commandment that makes sense, if very bitter sense, to the oppressed because they’re too weak to get rid of an oppressor. Christianity provides psychological comfort to those trapped in an impossible situation.

    But people who are free, and who are not oppressed, have no use for it. Christianity spread naturally among the people in the Middle East who were weighed down and oppressed by Roman rule. But in Northern Europe, Christianity had to be spread by the sword. The free and independent northern tribal peoples had to be forced into it. Then the Catholic church became a state power in the Middle Ages in conflict with other European states, and Christianity became more restrictive and oppressive as it became a tool used by the state to control the people. It was a psychological yoke that forced people not to question their station in life or the laws of nature. The Protestant Reformation was an attempt to overthrow this yoke, but then control of the Protestant churches was given to secular state rulers again. Why the heck should Henry the VIII make himself the head of the church if he didn’t see Christianity as a weapon of social control?

    Christian churches in the last few generations have been losing members because when you’re free, educated, and can think for yourself, you have no use for religion. The people who stay in the churches in this day and age tend to be kind of nuts, frankly. But what’s more, they’re timid. They don’t question those who tell them what to do, and they tend not to think for themselves. They also tend to be masochists.

    Why give up 10% of your income tithing when you could use that to raise and educate your kids and give them a good start in life? What you spend in tithing over 20 years could have bought one of your kids a used car once that kid graduated from college. If you’d invested the money, you would have grown it instead of thrown it away.

    • Disagree: kerdasi amaq
    • Replies: @mcohen
  109. Realist says:

    Speaking of dumbass self hating White Christians…I present Daniel Truett Cathy

    • Agree: Enemy of Earth
    • Replies: @Ace
  110. KevinR says:
    @Amerimutt Golems

    Re: Christian Zionism, The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (Mormon) does believe in the Biblical prophecies that the Jews will be gathered to their former lands prior to the second coming of Christ. They also teach that as written in Genesis, Ephraim, not Judah, was given the birthright, and will stand at the head of the House of Israel. So worshiping, or letting present day Jews (who are descended from Judah) take the lead, really isn’t part of the plan.

    • Replies: @Ann Nonny Mouse
  111. Realist says:

    In regard to BLM. In Chicago over the weekend, one hundred blacks shot one hundred other blacks…but only killed fourteen. What’s the point of having a gun…if you can’t shoot straight? They could kill more of their beloved fellow blacks…by throwing rocks.

    • Replies: @Colin Wright
  112. botazefa says:
    @Sollipsist

    Are you arguing that we should put more faith in what something looks like rather than attempts to find out what it really is?

    I think I was very clear. Couldn’t be more clear, honestly.

    Are you also saying that subsequent findings are automatically more trustworthy than initial findings

    I think you are being insincere.

  113. botazefa says:
    @Colin Wright

    That the kneelings are voluntary is hardly encouraging.

    A slave who is forced to kneel may someday revolt. It’s hard to place much hope in a slave who wants to kneel

    Someone who will kneel for anything will fall for everything.

    The voluntary kneelings, even full prostrations, to Black people simply because of the color of their skin is very weird. That Black people have literally allowed this done directly to them is baffling.

  114. @Vojkan

    “… if there weren’t Jews there’d still be the free-masons”
    Hard to disagree. I used to sympathize the second ones, comparing to the first.
    Even despite negative personal experience with both. Not anymore, after Covid-19.
    Just two gangs (well-intertwined on upper level from inside, actually, despite all
    external bravado, and, sometimes, even working as one) fighting for the world
    dominance.

  115. @Realist

    ‘In regard to BLM. In Chicago over the weekend, one hundred blacks shot one hundred other blacks…but only killed fourteen. What’s the point of having a gun…if you can’t shoot straight? ‘

    Don’t look a gift horse in the mouth.

    • Replies: @Realist
  116. “You have a few misconceptions of your own. Want it or not, whether whites have exercised power over Blacks since 1865, the Blacks now have such power. it was given to them by the interpretation and implementation of the 1964 Civil Rights act, perhaps the most evil betrayal in the history of the USA.”

    Let’s keep it simple, even if extreme ti make the point.

    Show me the white slave plantation.

    List for me the Supreme Court Decisions that bar whites from filing law suits.

    Nae the local ordinane that demands tat whites be subject to an exam befor voting.

    Show me the zoning laws that establish the practices of redlining.

    Show me the medical insurance plans and hospital policies that charged blacks more for less in care

    Show me the educational policies that bar whites from education —

    Show me the agricultural practices that deny whites loans and grants

    But before getting into specifics — you might want to read the legislation you bring to the fore — which does not grant blacks power over whites, but merely attempts to ensure equitable treatment and access. How does it do that by making way for anyone and everyone, including women —

    Even the supposed first black executive in the WH — skipping that he is half and half and therefore may as well be white catered t every demanded that whites demanded of him.

    Change Middle Eats policy whites got themselves all wound up — not unusual for whites it seems. As history makes clear whites get themselves in a state whenever any black acts on the agency whites claim blacks don’t have. So instead toning down the violence the half white guy to placate whites left and right and of course in obeisance to the white women as Sec of State:

    upended Libya
    upended Syria
    upended Syria
    continued to make hay in Iraq, Afghanistan
    oh did I mention the Ukraine, Yemen . . .

    Now as a conservative who opposed the election of that executive, it’s pretty clear despite his own intentions — he wasn’t yielding a white over his white over seers anywhere in the country. Kept in line by the age old gimmick of never being “uppity”. And he wasn’t. And he never got near his agenda.

    Black power over via the CRA . . . which gave even more access to whites guised as some repair for blacks.

    Even the oft bandied AA policy has been a boon for whites more than blacks.

  117. @botazefa

    Botazefa is a phony as a three dollar bill.

  118. @botazefa

    There is literally a video of Floyd begging and there is video of a plane flying into the World Trade Center and there is a video of a spaceship attacking Washington, and a video of… and then there is a huckster telling you to believe in videos.

  119. mcohen says:
    @Anon

    Turn The Other Cheek is a commandment…you mean “Open the other Cheek”

    • Replies: @anon
  120. Realist says:
    @Colin Wright

    Don’t look a gift horse in the mouth.

    True, but mighty small horse.

  121. Joyce: “Martini would disagree, and insist that by far [the Devil’s] cleverest ruse was to pretend he was an angel, while pointing an accusing finger at you.”

    My God! Such brilliance! It’s not white people who are the Devil, it’s the Jews!. Now all we have to do is tell people this and surely they will agree with us. Why, oh why hasn’t anyone thought of this before?

    With such profound insights from its intellectual contingent, the salvation of the white race cannot be far off.

    • Troll: kerdasi amaq
  122. dually says:

    I am often bemused by the lengths Christians, especially protestants, will go to keep from being called “racist”, as I am by the lengths that they will go to avoid responsibility for their own self-flagellation – by blaming the Jews!

    However, I don’t think that the self-flagellants who were, after all, under pressure from the plague, are an appropriate historical correlative here. Instead, the whole Woke Riot reminded me of the festival of Sparta, in which their slave, or serf, working class, were ritually attacked, humiliated and sometimes killed by the layabout, educated Spartan gentry. This was done in the autumn to show the Helots that they could be kept in line – like our present Globohomo over-class is currently doing to our working under-class whites.

  123. @Joe WEbb

    If the Christian churches sounded like Jesus/Yeshua in his last public speech before he was arrested Mathew 23, they would be useful. Read it. May the force be with you, old friend….

  124. Corvinus says:
    @Rational

    “BRAINWASHING WHITES INTO SELF-EXTERMINATION—THE BIGGEST JEWISH PSYCHOPS IN HISTORY.”

    What a hoot. So somehow whites, who have generally high IQ’s and high time preferences, are magically brought under the spell of Jewish machinations by the way of Cultural Marxism and sportsball. They have no agency and certainly no free will along the ay. Rather, their mental reasoning capabilities were essentially neutered. As a result, whites are mindless zombies shilling for Hollywood entertainment and the NFL. Yet you remain apparently immune these long-standing Jew tactics and, with soapbox in tow, are on a mission to tell whites to “wake up”.

    I don’t know whether to laugh or cry based on your outlandish world view.

  125. Corvinus says:

    As far as Joyce is concerned, his piece rests on a false premise –> “finally, pathological and self-flagellating Whites. This last group is undoubtedly the most puzzling and catastrophic element of the current crisis”.

    Perhaps white people are simply exercising their own ability to make decisions about race and culture in a manner that they prefer. As a result, their behavior is viewed by a radical segment of our society as being “subversive”. It’s extremely shallow thinking on the part of the author, and it is simply amazing that some people buy into his assertion without even thinking critically about it.

    “I was surprised and horrified at sheer callousness that some Whites could show towards their co-ethnics.”

    Why, Mr. Joyce. Are you that historically ignorant? Let me help you understand, as you should be other than surprised and horrified.

    The notion of “whites” or “European-whites” being bound together came about as a result of Social Darwinism and imperialism in the late 1800’s–the distinction that separated “us” from “them”. In this manner, the “lowest-rung” whites were deemed superior in social standing than their darkie counterparts, while at the same time knew full well their “pecking order” within the European hierarchy. The following source offers extensive evidence to prove this point.

    http://science.jrank.org/pages/10962/Race-Racism-in-Europe-French-Revolution-Nation.html

    One of the first and most important thinkers of the nineteenth century to elaborate this view of society was Joseph-Arthur de Gobineau, who began publishing his L’essai sur l’inegalité des races humaines (Essay on the inequality of the human races) in 1853. Gobineau’s history presented human development for the first time as a contest of races. His book was heavily researched in an attempt to draw together the most up-to-date scholarship of the new realms of science, especially German archaeology and philology and French anthropology. He concluded that contemporary nations were the patrimony of a racial past defined by the conquest of weaker races by stronger ones. He posited three great races, the white, the black, and the yellow, that engaged in constant battle. For Gobineau, the victor and true driving force of human history was the white, or European, race. Yet, this victory came always at a price. Lesser races never disappeared. Instead, they mixed into the conquering races, leaving a weaker whole. The mixture, in fact, elevated lower races, in which he included the yellow and the black and their lingering influence among European peasantry and urban working classes, while the white race was degraded.

    Georges Vacher de Lapouge, in his study of European skulls in 1888, saw three European races and ordered their quality and value: European Man, Alpine Man, and Homo Contractus. He argued that none of these races directly correlated with a specific nation, but his descriptions of their behaviors and religious ideas were clearly meant to correspond to Germany, Southern Europe, and the population of European Jews. The naturalized German citizen Houston Stewart Chamberlain wrote in 1899 that the German race struggled to maintain its purity because of the Darwinian form of natural selection that caused Germans to feel a revulsion toward intermixing with lesser races. Overall, this putative science of race uncoupled nationalism from its liberal roots, implying that those who lived within a national community did not necessarily belong. One could act, speak, or feel German or French but never be German or French.

    In newly unified Italy, northern Italians in Lombardy saw the threat of southern peoples, the Sicilians or Neapolitans, as racially enervating. They were thought to be different because of their hot-blooded, less rational characters—elements believed to emanate from their hotter climate and their proximity to Africa. Similar ideas existed in Spain toward those from the south, in particular Andalu sia. In northern Spain, notions of racial purity became important adjuncts of the Basque nationalist movement that sprang up in the late nineteenth century. The presence of foreign guest workers, or maketos, from other parts of Spain, was perceived as a threat to Basque purity. Sabino Arana, an early founder of Basque nationalism, proposed miscegenation laws in 1901 to prohibit the marriage of Basques to Spaniards.

    Imperialism helped solidify a view of the world as a hierarchy of races with Europeans at the zenith and all others arrayed below. One ugly symbol of this worldview was the “human zoo” that appeared throughout fin de siècle Europe in international fairs and other public spectacles. This kind of menagerie, replete with dioramic portrayals of humans living in their “typical” habitat, produced wide-eyed amazement among Europeans of the late nineteenth century and established racial hierarchy not just as an elite, scientific view of history but also as a popular one. By the 1880’s and 1890’s, race existed as a concrete idea recognizable to any European. Race became an essential element of national strength—and required defense and protection.

    Let us look at this “great replacement” in the United States from the perspective of WASP’s, the true Heritage Americans. They built America. How can we argue with that historical reality?

    Therefore it is tragic that WASP redoubts were subsequently overrun by foul-mouthed, parasitic louts from Eastern and Southern Europe in the late 1800 and early 1900’s. The 1924 Quota Act was a long-waited panacea to rein in such an odious creature, a wonderful piece of legislation that would make Hans F.K. Gunther proud. See, the simple fact of the matter, from the WASP point of view, is that the Eastern/Southern Europeans are infected with the “chosenite” virus. Stellar at patronizing, but not so much at moral consistency and applying to themselves the standards they demand of others.

    Face it, the Poles were especially notorious for being dirty, disease-ridden papists. The Italians bred like rabbits, lived in cramped quarters, and would not even bat an eyelash to bash in someone’s skull for a plug nickel. Yet, here we are with millions of them in the United States currently claiming they were historically embraced by their WASP counterparts because they were “white” and “European”, while simultaneously denying opportunities that their forefathers and foremothers received. Nostalgia has a funny way of distorting what truly went on in the past. WASPs were absolutely correct in connecting these particular groups with their own unique “proboscis” instinct. It is an absolute shame that the aforementioned legislation unfortunately failed miserably in its purpose and intention.

    Again, from the WASP angle, comedian Owen Benjamin noted in one of his recent, heroic Internet videos that the 1828 Websters Dictionary defined what is Heritage American—A native of America; originally applied to the aboriginals, or copper-colored races, found here by the Europeans; but now applied to the descendants of Europeans born in America.

    In other words, this “sheer callousness that some whites could show towards their co-ethnics” has been a feature, not a bug, in European and white society.

    “Jordan Peterson, simultaneously capable of intellectual sublimities and travesties, is absolutely correct in his observation in 12 Rules for Life.”

    LOL. Alt Right leader Vox Day sees it differently. Perhaps you should find time to debate him.

    http://voxday.blogspot.com/2019/10/who-broke-jordan-peterson.html

    http://voxday.blogspot.com/2019/09/he-took-his-damn-pills.html

    “The idea that Whites, particularly Anglo-Saxons, had a divinely ordained mission to raise up the backward peoples of the earth was driven by Exeter Hall’s most basic article of faith—that all peoples could be raised to the same high level of civilization as themselves. Liberals always have a very strong self-concept as morally superior.”

    Liberals AND conservatives. Get it right, Mr. Joyce. As in preserving the existing social order as created by Europeans by conquering inferior peoples and seeking to elevate their status. Reverend Josiah Strong stated:

    “The Anglo-Saxon is the representative of two great ideas, which are closely related. One of them is that of civil liberty. Nearly all of the civil liberty of the world is enjoyed by Anglo-Saxons: the English, the British colonists, and the people of the United States. … The other great idea of which the Anglo-Saxon is the exponent is that of a pure spiritual Christianity…It follows, then, that the Anglo-Saxon, as the great representative of these two ideas, the depositary of these two greatest blessings, sustains peculiar relations to the world’s future, is divinely commissioned to be, in a peculiar sense, his brother’s keeper.”

    His words are a precursor to the adage “Invade the world, invite the world”.

    “There’s no question, however, that many Christian churches have completely folded into patterns of victimizing themselves.”

    Yet, you admit you’re not from a Catholic background, so perhaps you lack the insight here to make that sort of pronouncement.

    • Replies: @Colin Wright
    , @dually
  126. @Corvinus

    All that typing… Too bad you’ve already demonstrated it’s not worthwhile reading your posts.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  127. dually says:
    @Corvinus

    the “lowest-rung” whites were deemed superior in social standing than their darkie counterparts,

    Absolutely incorrect. Google “Telescopic philanthropy”. Also: Poor whites were the first slaves in America. The Irish were considered the least “evolved” human specimen according to Darwin. “Anglo-Saxon” DNA is rare in the British Isles, the majority being Celtic.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  128. anon[427] • Disclaimer says:
    @mcohen

    Turn the other cheek is not a commandment. Jesus did not tell anyone to turn the other cheek or stop fighting to deny themselves any self defense. Jesus told them to turn the other cheek because at the time it would have meant their lives to not do so, they wouldn’t win. In other words, “live to fight another day if you need to”. Don’t sacrifice yourself. Jesus wasn’t an asshole. Those people who you see as an enemy you should see as a friend, because they are your people and they at the time were fighting for them too.

    • Agree: kerdasi amaq
  129. Alfred says:
    @Anonymous

    China vs. India, Turkey vs. Egypt, Iran vs. Iraq, Pakistan vs. India

    And Egypt vs. Ethiopia

    Ethiopia is threatening the source of the Blue Nile by damming. Egypt cannot survive without this water.

    Rumours about Egyptian military base in South Sudan

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  130. Alfred says:
    @Emily

    Iran v Iraq?
    On what grounds do you make this claim.
    You surprise me.

    It has always been the objective of the Zionists that Iran and Iraq have wars – that is why they encouraged Saddam Hussein to invade Iran in 1981. The media in the West pretends that Iran invaded by calling it the “Iran Iraq war”

    In the real world, the Iranians and the Arabs of Iraq are very different people – even if many of them share the Shia faith. Iran no more wants to occupy Iraq than Russia wants to occupy Ukraine. These are propaganda pieces by the usual suspects.

  131. @KevinR

    present day Jews (who are descended from Judah)

    Nice that you can read and write, my child, but you have a lot of learning to do, a lot to learn before you grow up. History. Learn history. Learn all about the life of Alexander the Great of Macedonia. Learn of his enormous conquests and the consequences in the centuries that followed, great empires, safe travel, where all the educated, all over the known world, spoke Greek. The first dozen popes of Rome only spoke Greek in church. A Roman emperor notorious for persecuting the Christians but also a famous philosopher, wrote his Meditations in Greek. Centuries earlier earlier the Septuagint was completed. How many centuries? Why? Read Matt. 23:15, Jesus denouncing the aggressive proselytizing of the Pharisees, and grasp that it had been going on throughout that Greek-speaking world for centuries before that. Learn of the quote of an earier writer made by Flavius Josephus, Ant., 14, 115, how already a century before his time there were enormous numbers of Jews all over that world, probably far more than there are today. Understand that there was no Second Exile, the Second Temple Jews were never expelled from Palestine, there is no Diaspora, today’s Jews originated all over the world, they are not Semites, all fake.

    Notice that the original Hebrews, never expelled post-Ezra, are today’s Palestinians, the real Semites, suffering slow genocide by the European fake Jews.

  132. Enrique Cardova [AKA "Enrique Cardova a"] says:

    Andew Joyce says:
    But does the Black man, at the present moment, really have the whip hand over the White man? Is it even the case in the United States, where the demographic balance is tipped even more heavily against Whites? I think not.

    Agreed, and a good observation debunking hysterical claims re any black “takeover.” The black-white IR marriage rate for example is LESS than 1 %. Whites typically have 13 TIMES the wealth of blacks, and an income 50-60% HIGHER, on average, as credible polls like PEW show. Hell of this be a “black takeover” white people need more of it. So where is this so called “whip hand” or “vanishing of the white race”?

    —————————-

    Contemporary Black power in the West, in and of itself, is not self-sustaining but is rather dependent on a vast cultural and legal apparatus that Blacks had little or no role in designing. This apparatus is instead the contrivance of three actors: the Jews; politically, financially, and professionally incentivized Whites; and, finally, pathological and self-flagellating Whites.

    Overstated. Actually contemporary “black power” is a diverse narrative with diverse people- with everything from techie entrepreneurship, to political operatives of the Dem party, to ranting Youtubers, to the clean-cut legions of NOI. And it does not depend on Jews. In fact it may be and is sometimes opposed to Jewish influence.

    —————————-

    This last group is undoubtedly the most puzzling and catastrophic element of the current crisis. Much more horrifying than Powell’s utterance is the fact that the White man still holds the whip, but chooses to beat himself with it..
    When I first saw images of Whites kneeling for Blacks, washing the feet of Blacks, and otherwise lending themselves to the hysteria of Black sainthood, I was confronted with a sequence of mental images from the distant past.

    White flagellants are not puzzling at all. The images are all part of performative theater, just white people acting out a ritual drama, for a particular social event. When it is all over, white people will go back to relatively comfortable lives, driving cars fill of dope and little relative concern about being stopped by the police. This is why in both NYC and Minnesota, whites stopped turned out to be carrying MORE guns and/or contraband than blacks, but it was the blacks who were stopped at massively higher rates. All in all, a good outcome for white people.

    —————————-

    tells us that plagues are fertile ground for irrational self-sacrifice, and coronavirus, with a little help from the late George Floyd, has not disappointed. Joannes Stobaeus, in his Florilegium, noted that when a plague befell the Spartans “they received an oracle that they would be saved if some Spartans would be selected to be killed by the king.”

    Its not irrational self-sacrifice at all, but theater, so that some white people appear concerned and sympathetic. But as in decades past, they will not enact any real reforms of police forces. Andrew fails to see this.

    —————————-

    Although initially supported by the Church, it soon became clear the flagellants were anti-establishment dissidents in every respect. They rejected the authority of priests and clerics, who were regarded by the flagellants as sunk in sin and therefore intrinsic to the problem. The flagellants rejected the Eucharist, asserting that their blood sacrifice was a more authentic communion with Christ. Finally, they revealed their role as populist social revolutionaries by turning against all established elites, including the very wealthy, the nobility, the city leaders and, most interesting of all, the Jews.

    Andrew’s analogy of the flagellants to some of today’s white supporters or sympathizers of BLM or Floyd protests falls a bit flat, in that many white supporters /sympathizers are not revolutionaries at all, but just folk who want to appear on the side of the angels for a brief time. Once that is done, its back to white business as usual. This is why SUBSTANTIAL police reform has been a losing horse in even liberal regions and cities, thugh in some cases things are better than they were in the Jim Crow past.

    —————————-

    In fact, everywhere the flagellants went a violent reaction against the Jews followed. In Frankfurt, in July 1349, the flagellants stormed the Jewish neighborhood themselves, and set it on fire. . Unsurprisingly, the flagellants were quickly denounced as heretics by the existing elite power structure, and were ruthlessly suppressed to extinction throughout Europe.

    If so then the flagellants have more in common with modern day right-wingers, whether of the “hard”, “soft” or “alt” variety, who like the flagellants, continually rebuke themselves for failing to measure up to the great white heroes of yore, excoriate other white people for being “weak” and consistently attack Jew on a variety of platforms.

    —————————-

    n stark contrast to the role of the Brethren of the Cross, our latter-day White flagellants are truly birds of a feather with the elite status quo. Those lauding Blacks and subjecting themselves to humiliating acts of politically correct piety have accepted a form of White self-mortification that is entirely beneficial to our elites, and is without any truly redemptive or socially revolutionary features.

    But said modern flagellation does have redemptivie value for whites. If announces that “we care” and “we feel your pain” which is a great way of sidetracking minority anger at a sometimes corrupt Crim Justic system. Once the cameras are gone and the heat does down, its business as usual in many cases (though not all).

    —————————-

    The flagellants of the past may have acted in an irrational response to disease, but they transmuted this response into concrete social activism that benefited the broader ethnic group — by attempting to topple or undermine harmful and exploitative relationships at the top of society. Latter-day flagellants feign personal mortification, when in reality they cover themselves in temporary social kudos and self-congratulation. Individually, they harm not a hair on their own heads and spill not a drop of blood, but rather seek to ingratiate themselves into a system of social rewards and even financial benefits.

    Agreed for SOME white flagellants, Its theater.

    —————————-

    And all the while, the personal fakery of these latter-day flagellants rips bloody shreds from the back of the group as a whole, demoralizing the kin group and energizing its enemies. The latter-day flagellants adopt the pose of self-sacrifice and abasement, throwing their racial kin under the proverbial bus in order to exalt themselves, and themselves alone. They avoid any suggestion of personal sin by professing their “anti-racism,” while flinging judgment and condemnation at those who refuse to bend the knee. The reality is that the latter-day flagellants need these refusers in order to look like “exceptions” in the first place.

    Again agreed for SOME. But Andrew fails to see that not all is self-congratulatory theater. Some of those flagellants will actually do on to do something constructive about police reform. They go beyond theater and actually get useful things done. Whether they will be able to overcome massively entrenched and well financed mostly white opposition, such as for police unions, for substantial long-term reform is an open question, but they will work towards getting a number of practical intermediate things done.

  133. Anonymous[266] • Disclaimer says:
    @XiO

    The Grand Strategy outlined by XiO (before the descent into madness) isn’t all that much more ridiculous than real Grand Strategies. To understand the world and human actions in it, you have to understand that organizations are run and staffed by specialists who aren’t aren’t all that bright. Their goals are constrained by this — they need a simple story, a simple Grand Strategy.
    In the case of the urban loss of thier natural monopolies in the 1950s-1960s, the Grand Strategy was “Get Federal Money. Find whoever will give us Federal Money and support him, her, or it politically. (I capitalize because Federal Money is a semi-mystical concept, a never-ending flow of origin that nobody thinks about.) If the cities don’t have enough population to make their political support vital, then import more people. If the people leave to go elsewhere, import people who can’t need the Federal Money and therefore can’t leave the urban areas where it is dispensed.
    Simple as that, ridiculous as that, boneheaded stupid as that.

    The hard part is believing that Grand Strategies could be absolutely stupid and self defeating. They can be and almost always are.

    The important question is: why is such an obviously stupid strategy adopted? The Jesuits fell for the Left’s Grand Strategy (“Take things from whomever has them, give them to us, we give them to the poor, everybody will be happy”), for example. Why not something more rational and less destructive, such as nudity during warm weather ?
    By the same token, Blacks, maybe 10% of the population and already driven out of some large California urban areas by other POC, are now promoting what appears to be a race war. Why that? Why not something that would actually help them, like eating more vegetables, or trying to hold on to the janitorial jobs that Blacks can actually do? Why that particular Grand Strategy?
    Answer those questions by something more than “The Jews did it” or “The Catholics did it”, or “The Rich did it”, or even “The Devil did it”, you have a hint of what drives the world.

    • Replies: @El Dato
    , @Enrique Cardova
  134. Anonymous[266] • Disclaimer says:
    @Alfred

    Right, forgot that one. Too bad Egypt/Ethiopia negotiations broke down.

  135. anonymous[375] • Disclaimer says:
    @Fr. John

    the Vine of the One True Faith.

    Nonsense! Christianity (of all flavours) is simply your run-of-the-mill pagan polytheist mangods-worshipping godlessness. There is no “True” in it, except if one puts it as, true falsehoods, like in, clear falsehoods.

    How is the mangods-worshipping, human-like father/son “gods” & incarnation believing Christianity any different from pagan Hinduism?

    • Troll: Seraphim
  136. Whitewolf says:
    @Fox

    Now I have to add SJW, Antifa, BLM, the hair-trigger indignation industry, people who get red in their face with anger about white privilege and white supremacism, notions as meaningless as detructive.

    White privilege and White supremacism might be destructive terms today but they aren’t meaningless. The point is to get Whites thinking they don’t deserve any privilege or supremacy in countries they founded and built.

    By denying you have White privilege you deny that you deserve any. By denying you are a White supremacist you in effect become a White submissivist. That is what anti-Whites want to achieve. They don’t want equality.

    Zimbabwe and South Africa were once countries where Whites had privileges and supremacy. Both were carved out of the jungle by Whites. Both were destroyed when Whites gave up their privilege and supremacy. To anyone sane this result didn’t come as a surprise.

    • Agree: El Dato
    • Replies: @Enrique Cardova
  137. El Dato says:
    @Rational

    Imagine being so full of yourself that you need to sell Jesus as Negro – or believe that would even make sense – or believe it would make a difference.

  138. El Dato says:
    @Anonymous

    you have a hint of what drives the world

    Extreme cognitive and organisational limits?

  139. Corvinus says:
    @Colin Wright

    It’s up to you to choose to remain ignorant.

  140. Corvinus says:
    @dually

    “Absolutely incorrect. Google “Telescopic philanthropy”.”

    A few individuals who were charitable to peoples other than their own does not negate the fact most “lower-rung” whites considered themselves far superior in intellect than blacks, with “higher-rung” whites nodding in approving and ensuring that both groups understood their “proper place”.

    “Poor whites were the first slaves in America.”

    Patently false. Poor whites had legal protections–even the criminal whites who came to the colonies to work–and the freedom to move. And indentured servants were guaranteed the Rights of Englishmen.

    “The Irish were considered the least “evolved” human specimen according to Darwin.

    Thanks for proving my point–there is a “hierarchy of whiteness”.

    “Anglo-Saxon” DNA is rare in the British Isles, the majority being Celtic.”

    No.

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/07/28/how-british-are-you-mapped-dna-testing-shows-the-most-anglo-saxo/

    https://metro.co.uk/2016/07/28/its-more-than-likely-youre-not-ethnically-british-6034191/

  141. Enrique Cardova [AKA "Enrique Cardova a"] says:
    @Whitewolf

    Laughable. For one thing, both Zimbabwe and South Africa have very little “jungle” to carve anything out of. Then you even more laughably say:

    “By denying you have White privilege you deny that you deserve any. By denying you are a White supremacist you in effect become a White submissivist. That is what anti-Whites want to achieve. They don’t want equality.”

    This is a rather dense statement. Actually “denying” white privilege and white supremacism is a shrewd modern strategy that has been very very successful for white people. The landscape has changed.It no longer pays to about hollering “segregation forever” like George Wallace. That’s from 50 years ago. Even Wallace had changed his spiel by 1968. If the GOP had went around yelling happy affirmations of white supremacism they would never have been successful with the southern strategy or the national strategy. Only the clueless living in the past fail to see this.

    • Replies: @Whitewolf
    , @Justvisiting
  142. Enrique Cardova [AKA "Enrique Cardova a"] says:
    @Anonymous

    Andrew Joyce says:
    In my own study of “White Pathology and the 1861 Morant Bay rebellion” for the 2013 special edition of The Occidental Quarterly, I was surprised and horrified at sheer callousness that some Whites could show towards their co-ethnics. The Morant Bay rebellion was a horrifically violent episode, with gruesome, extremely painful murders motivated by hatred of Whites. The town of Bowden was plundered, and the island curate “had his tongue cut out while he was still alive, an attempt is said to have been made to skin him.” Another individual “was ripped open and had his entrails taken out.” Others were “roasted alive” and “had their eyeballs scooped out.” According to The Times of London, the mob then indulged in alcoholic excess, harboring the “drunken dream of negro mastery and white slavery.

    The Morant Bay Rebellion was a typical civil revolt, and shows the typical mixed pattern. SOME rebels were brutal, OTHER blacks actually helped protect whites. It was hardly more destructive than your typical white Irish riot or small-scale local revolt. It didn’t affect all of Jamaica, only the relatively small potatoes area around the town of Stony Gut and Morant Bay, And the final bottom line was a black body count massively exceeding anything white- almost 450 blacks were killed, more hundreds wounded, and 600 harshly whipped, compared to a white body count of less than 30 people. Hell if this be “genocide” white people don’t need to worry about blacks much- given a 30 to 1 body count advantage, plus a freehand brutalizing people who were not even involved in any revolt, or were forced into supporting the rebels. Sounds like a great deal for white people.

    —————————-

    It was Africa, hitherto dormant, that had broken out in their natures. … They desired the extermination of their emancipators.”

    Dubious. Actually the slave masters were anything but emancipators. They intended to keep the blacks in a permanent state of subservience, and cheap exploited labor, regardless of any emancipation laws on the books, just like whites did in the Jim Crow south and pre-British controlled South Africa. And who says “Africa dormant” had anything to do with it? When white Spartacus carried out his revolt, he brutally smashed operators and representatives of white Rome.

    —————————-

    To the clear-thinking individual, it was a plainly criminal, and unimaginably brutal series of actions, carried out for malicious reasons against a population targeted for being White. And yet, there was a liberal faction in England convinced not only that it was the Black population that were the true victims, but also that their fellow Whites were reprehensible monsters who deserved the fate which befell them. This pathological response, laden with a misplaced hyper-emotionality, would shake the Empire to its core, sapping its confidence, and bequeathing a legacy which is still felt to this day.

    Actually Andrew’s argument is not “clear” at all. Most credible histories of Morant Bay show that most white people died not simply because they were white, but because they were agents of the oppressive government, or direct operators of a system like plantation owners or overseers that oppressed the blacks. Whites who had done right by the blacks were actually spared by the rebels. In fact, black grievances had been around for decades, and they were mostly ignored or suppressed by whites creating a volatile situation, just as the white liberals in Britain had warned, but they too were ignored. There was some collateral damage to the innocent in the revolt, like any other armed revolt, but if the goal of the rebels were to kill white people, they were the biggest fools on earth, for they could have racked up a huge white body count far exceeding the approx 30 white people that died. Again, hell, if future black rebels intend to fight this way in the “GREAT RACIAL APOCALYPSE” hankered over hysterically by assorted right-wingers, white people don’t have much to worry about. Victory is already assured, since the weakling negroes will not actually kill all the white people in their gun-sights, or in their actual hands

    —————————-

    The main warriors on behalf of the Blacks were Christian philanthropists who believed that these races could be raised to standards of education and conduct which would place them alongside Europeans. Members of this group tended to be Non-Conformist, middle-class, and liberal or radical in their politics. Crucially, most had never travelled outside Britain, and had little or no experience with the races they so emphatically and persistently eulogized.

    Actually some did visit the West Indies and saw frst hand the brutality and greed to many whites there. Others had full written accounts of not only whites on the ground, but the writings of blacks as well suffering under the white post-slavery regime. The main criticism of white Governor Eyre is not that he put down the rebels, but that he used disproportionate force for a small scale local rebellion, including torture and mass killing. That was the central criticism, and it had little to do with “liberalism.” Trying to backdate the “evil liberals” meme into Morant Bay is a travesty of the actual history of the event.

    —————————-

    The term “Exeter Hall” thus became synonymous with what the brilliant Charles Dickens described as “platform sympathy for the Black and . . . platform indifference to our own countrymen.”

    Not surprisingly, Dickens conveniently does not mention the white brutality and greed or govt oppression that harmed the black population of Jamaica, or the local Morant Bay area. Indeed in local conditions of crop failure and flooding, the white government insisted on extracting poll taxes from the impoverished black peasants. It was the liberals that had earlier warned that negative conditions were brewing as a result, and their main complaint was not that the revolt was crushed, but the excessive force and cruelty used against what was a small scale local revolt, largely confined to the small town of Stony Gut and its environs.

    —————————-

    . It makes me stark wild too. Isn’t it absolutely terrifying that Dickens’s words on the indifference of these universalist elites to the plight of the working classes of their own people are entirely in keeping with what we see today? These people have the appearance of empathy, but not for anyone that looks like himself.

    What plight of what white people in Jamaica? The plight of the overseers that still terrorized the blacks? The “plight” of the white merchants that continually ripped them off? Where exactly in the harsh sugar fields of Jamaica was this mysterious “white working class”? lol…

    —————————-

    The idea that Whites, particularly Anglo-Saxons, had a divinely ordained mission to raise up the backward peoples of the earth was driven by Exeter Hall’s most basic article of faith—that all peoples could be raised to the same high level of civilization as themselves. Liberals always have a very strong self-concept as morally superior. Moral posturing is, of course, now front and center in the contemporary West.

    But moral posturing is a big part of what tight-wingers do, only their morality is geared towards white convenience and profit, white laying on deceptive narratives on how they are “civilizing” the dusky natives. This posturing is seen widely, from praising slavery for the “uplifting labor” it brought to the blacks, to dispossessing poor black people off their native lands in South Africa in the name of “civilization and commerce” which supposedly would “improve” the lot of the black man. One such touching activity was for example the Native Land Act that reserved 87% of the land for white people (including the best land) and allocating the dismal leftovers for blacks- all wrapped in the nice language of “uplift. Who says liberals have any monopoly on moral posturing?

    —————————-

    What we are thus seeing, in this and myriad other instances, is the emotional abuse and torture of a generation of Whites too ill-informed to generate appropriate intellectual or emotional responses to the fictions they are presented with.

    Actually the brutality, murder and suffering were not “fictional” but all too real, with negative fallout even today in US Society. Sure the whites winced, because the film actually told more of the truth than the bogus sanitized narratives of white history. Yes the remains of 2-3million people, including children lie at the bottom of the Atlantic in the wake of the salve ships. Yes, some ships like the infamous Zong, tossed 130 sick people live overboard to claim “cargo loss” and this collect the insurance money. Kaching! Yes Jewish mothers and their children were whipped immediately off the trains to drive them on the double to gas ovens. None of this is “fictional” and if people have to squirm because the truth is being told, well then, so be it. Squirming is actually good, for the light of truth, was actually one of the key factors that finally led to the abolition of slavery, and white churches played a key role in changing public opinion and policy, a fact that white people should be proud of.

    —————————-

    The dreamscape of Exeter Hall, in which traitors and murderers become national heroes, is entrenched. It has been absorbed, integrated, and assimilated into the White consciousness, and we, the ideological and psychological descendants of Dickens, are relegated to a much-maligned periphery for daring to suggest that the emperor has no clothes.

    Dead rebels later becoming national or cultural heroes are par for the course among white people. White Spartacus has long been admired by white people despite his killing of many white people. White Tito became a hero of millions of white Yugoslavs. The many heroes of the white Irish, killed and tortured some civilians and were crushed by the white British, but in later years they became heroes. So what else is new? And one of the things that drove the rebellion is a thing that inflamed and drove white people to rebellion when they were impacted- taxes. Indeed in local conditions of crop failure and flooding, the white government insisted on extracting poll taxes from the impoverished black peasants.

  143. Enrique Cardova [AKA "Enrique Cardova a"] says:

    Andrew Joyce says:
    But Christ’s archetypal death exists as an example of how to accept finitude, betrayal and tyranny heroically — how to walk with God despite the tragedy of self-conscious knowledge — and not as a directive to victimise ourselves in the service of others. To sacrifice ourselves to God (to the highest good, if you like) does not mean to suffer silently and willingly when some person or organisation demands more from us, consistently, than is offered in return. That means we are supporting tyranny, and allowing ourselves to be treated like slaves. It is not virtuous to be victimised by a bully.

    Here Andrew’s argument contradicts itself. Earlier, he expresses disapproval of the churches that spoke out against injustice and slavery, but then here he says Christians should not remain silent and be bullied. Which is it?

    And since when do white people exemplify Christ’s archetypal death in acceptance of finitude, betrayal and tyranny heroically when their interests are at stake? Really? Where is this state of white piety in history? The virtuous white rulers of apartheid South Africa or Jim Crow? The white “fighting Irish” in their interminable revolts? The “heroic” white SS shooting Jewish kids in the mass graves of Poland? The “suffering” white real estate agents and banks reaping massive profits from routing blacks into overpriced, crumbling ghetto properties?

    —————————-

    There’s no question, however, that many Christian churches have completely folded into patterns of victimizing themselves, or at least engaging in high-kudos superficial acts of self-abasement, in the service of Blacks and the broader culture of critique.

    A few white people doing these performative rituals does not at all define white culture or behavior. Using the above approach, if a small amount ot racialists show up somewhere to shout racist slogans then ALL white people are racists. This is what Andrew’s simplistic reasoning boils down to.

    —————————-

    I’m not from a Catholic background, and I’ve been very critical of elements and expressions of Christianity in the past, but even I have to concede, that, objectively speaking, Vigano is on to something. One of the most Christian people I know is absolutely disgusted with White behavior for Black Lives Matter, while the most anti-Christian person I know (a friend of a friend) is also the most virtue-signalling, pro-homosexual, pro-miscegenation cretin I’ve ever encountered. There are no simple answers here, and if one is to denounce the Church as the root and cause of some of our major problems, one might as well denounce everything else in Western modernity that’s been co-opted by our adversaries. It should be clear that there wouldn’t be much left that we couldn’t denounce.

    No word on whether Vigano denounced police corrupting and brutality, but agreed in general.

    —————————-

    The question of why Whites are allowing themselves to be subjected to this kind of treatment on a mass scale, and in some cases encouraging it, rather requires a clear and unflinching view of the mass perception of White identity politics today.

    Actually a handful of white people doing these rituals are hardly a reflection of white mass culture, which for the most part, is indifferent to blacks, unless something highly visible on race happens, as with George Floyd. And once the furor does down, white people are back to business as usual.

    —————————-

    Quite frankly, we have been designated the ultimate evil, and no punishment or humiliation will be enough to satisfy our enemies.

    Actually, most white people are not losing sleep over this, or the trivial group doing racial theater.

    —————————-

    The Politics of Evil
    For Russell, who develops the theme to an unmatched degree, there is great power in being able to label one’s opponent and their ideas as evil. To be labelled as being in league with the Devil—or the modern equivalent—is tantamount to political (and in extreme cases, physical) death.

    But to label an opponent as evil is a key part of right wrong discourse, whether it be the evil Martin Luther King or the evil “liberals” or “evil” BLM, or the evil “eternal” Jew. Hate is a cornerstone of right-wing cultural and political narratives.

    —————————-

    <b?There really is no question about the fact that White identity politics is post-modernity’s only radical political evil, and Adolf Hitler is its Great Satan, looming over a horde of contemporary minor demons.

    To SOME extent this is true, as shown by the mainstream media. But Black Identity politics is likewise condemned as a radical political evil by right-wingers, and some in the liberal camp who find it “divisive.” Indeed the sterling JE Hoover spend massive amounts of money chasing and crushing even the most trivial black groups, and today’s FBI actually brought out its own “Black identity terrorists” surveillance and monitoring before likewise defining a similar “White Identity Terrorists” classification. Right wingers and libertarians who support the police on all things have no problem if civil rights and liberties are routinely violated or abused, as long as the victims are black. This is doubly interesting, because most murders of Law enforcement officers by domestic terrorists in the last 30 years were committed by whites on the right-side of the spectrum.

    —————————-

    Tucker Carlson may be deemed to toil, for example, in the second or third circle, but you readers, with your race pride and anti-Semitism, well, you are beyond all hope in the ninth circle. Our post-religious culture even has a physical substitute for Hell, in the form of a long-abandoned camp in rural Poland.

    But Ann Coulter would consign “the liberals” to the deepest circle of hell, and unlike Dante’s fictional circles, the death camps of rural Poland were real.

    —————————-

    In the West, what else comes close to this politico-moral taxonomy that borders on the religious in its dogmatic excess? Nothing.

    Actually right-wing racism (in its various versions) more than matches anything thrown up by “the liberals”

  144. @botazefa

    How do you know that these are not staged events? Leftist actors giving the knee to blacks for the good of the cause and creating nice photo-ops and agit-prop.

    • Replies: @botazefa
  145. botazefa says:
    @kerdasi amaq

    How do you know that these are not staged events?

    Absolutely they are staged. Did I imply otherwise? My bad.

    The better question, if I may, is are they *centrally* staged or ad hoc? Probably that’s what you meant.

    Pelosi et al are certainly part of planned staging – probably they fear getting primaried by BLM candidates.

  146. Whitewolf says:
    @Enrique Cardova

    This is a rather dense statement. Actually “denying” white privilege and white supremacism is a shrewd modern strategy that has been very very successful for white people.

    Yeah it’s worked like a charm. Now they get to watch their country literally being burned to the ground and flooded by non-whites who hate them.

    They get to watch their historical monuments torn down by violent mobs.

    They get to watch their children taught how evil their own race is and how cool it will be when Whites no longer exist.

    They get to watch as police and politicians kneel before violent thugs while preaching against White supremacy.

    They get to listen as non-whites lecture them on how to better serve POC’s and cater to their every whim.

    They get to watch as both sides of the uniparty argue over how to best serve non-whites and illegals whilst totally ignoring their interests.

    After all of the above they are told how privileged they are.

    I bet they feel real successful.

    • Replies: @Enrique Cardova
  147. Enrique Cardova [AKA "EnriqueCard ova"] says:

    Even Islamic terrorism, one of the few aspects of modern life that isn’t readily assimilable by global capitalism, is always qualified in most media and academic treatments as implying some mediating factors, such as Western imperialism, the alienation of Muslim minorities, or any of a wide range of social and environmental causes that are ultimately the fault of Europeans. For those in charge of the national conversation, Islamic terrorism is something explainable and therefore, in the final examination, non-diabolical.

    But snarling Islamic proponents are likewise censored out by “the liberal media.” When does Louis Farrakhan get sweetness and light from that media for example?

    —————————-

    Of all political stances, only the assertion of White ethnic interests is deemed by our mainstream as equally irrational and immoral, being based on the alleged “fantasy” of race and the moral crime of wishing to “dominate” or adopt “supremacy” over other groups.

    Actually only the OPEN EXPRESSION of white ethnic interests is downplayed. Its just not good business to be OPENLY snarlingy racist. But who says white people are not protecting their interests around the clock? Both white left-wingers and white right-wingers support white ethnic interests. This is why many “liberal” areas are so lily white, and why they have not enacted serious police reform despite decades of talk. White liberals stay in business because they protect certain white bottom lines.

    —————————-

    Whites can prostrate themselves in the name of “anti-racism” because by doing so they’re fighting the religious or secular contemporary incarnation of Satan.

    Again it is an open question as to how significant said whites are outside the PC echo chambers of college campuses or parts of the mainstream national media. Just like swallows and summer, a few white people “taking a knee” after a visible media occurrence does not a “crisis in white culture” make.

    —————————-

    The point here is that all conventional strategies designed to move White dissident thought from the fringe to the mainstream may be doomed to failure because they neglect the fact we aren’t even on the same spectrum of political possibility, or even within the same psychological framework. We are exiles, declared to be total anathema.

    To which many even poorer and oppressed blacks might well reply “welcome to the club.”

    —————————-

    What is really required, therefore, is a “fight fire with fire” strategy that embodies emotionality and triggers psychological responses that resonate on a deeper level, beyond consciousness. This necessitates a propaganda designed exclusively to instill feelings of disgust, fear, and hatred for those opposed to White interests. In the final analysis, it must be hammered home that our opponents are not wrong, weak-willed, venal, or corrupt — they are morally, politically, and spiritually evil. They belong in the lowest Hell.

    Andrew suggested strategy will largely fail. His proposed “white power” campaign will upset a white-washing co-opting strategy that is working \ well for white people overall. These days you do NOT want a fully mobilized non-white bloc, because then you lose the advantages of a more effective “divide and conquer” strategy. You do NOT for example, want angry Hispanics and Blacks to turn out in force in key swing states to hamstring white candidates yelling bout “white power” and “evil culluds.” Andrew’s strategy is a losing hand, particularly given growing minority populations. There are other better, less stressful ways to preserve white hegemony.

    And a demonization campaign is old news in US culture and politics. The right-wing has used it successfully for centuries- from “Pitchfork” Ben Tillman’s scurrilous “holla negro” campaigns, to labeling people who simply want to seem more justice done as “communists” or “agitators” or “evil liberals” etc etc. Furthermore demonization not only calls forth a similar counter-response from the demonized, but also a withdrawal of support by some key white constituents (like white women) who are repulsed by the ugly name-calling, lies and propaganda. Reasonable people want to have reasonable conversations even across the aisle. Replacing ordinary decency or even simple dialog with vicious trolling, blatantly false propaganda and snarling demonization can and has backfired in many places. This can easily lead to electoral losses, that can even take away the ground right-wingers now hold. Barry Goldwater’s embrace of Dixie-cratism in 1964 for example cost the GOP.

    —————————-

    “Martini’s book was influential through the end of the Middle Ages and even into the Renaissance.”[1] This period witnessed more expulsions of the Jews than any other in history. They say the greatest trick the Devil ever pulled was convincing people he didn’t exist. Martini would disagree, and insist that by far his cleverest ruse was to pretend he was an angel, while pointing an accusing finger at you.

    This example again illustrates the ultimate logic of Andrew’s suggestions. Martini’s book was indeed influential, and the demonization campaigns victimized many Jews. It laid the groundwork for even greater campaigns of demonization to come, culminating in the ovens and mass graves of The Shoah. And this is the final ending point, a warning that applies to the left as well. Their campaigns of demonization led to the mass graves and torture-racked prison camps of “smiling” Joe Stalin. It could be said that demonization doesn’t play favorites as far as ultimate fallout, one way or another.

  148. Enrique Cardova [AKA "EnriqueCard ova"] says:
    @Whitewolf

    Yeah it’s worked like a charm. Now they get to watch their country literally being burned to the ground and flooded by non-whites who hate them.

    Rather over-dramatic. Who says America is being “burned to the ground” because some Blacks, Hispanics and yes White people looted a few shops an burned some buildings? This is child’s play compared to the white riots of just a few decades ago. Where is this “apocalypse” at of “America burning”? Really?
    —————————

    They get to watch their historical monuments torn down by violent mobs.

    What’s exactly “their” historical monuments? The white Union troops, sturdy dudes with rifles from places like Iowa, Ohio, New York etc had no interest in “celebrating” monuments to people who led armies trying to kill them, and led armies determined to preserve slavery. As historian Victor Davis Hanson shows, when Sherman marched thru Georgia, those badass white farm boys openly mocked Confederate leadership and the confederate cause, noting that many self-styled confederate “tough guys” turned out to not be so tough at all.

    ————————————-

    They get to watch their children taught how evil their own race is and how cool it will be when Whites no longer exist.

    This mostly fever-swamp right-wing caterwauling. To the contrary, white kids are educated on how white people are on the good side of history in getting rid of such excrescences as Jim Crow and slavery. And that education is spot on, and is to white America’s credit.

    ————————————-
    They get to watch as police and politicians kneel before violent thugs while preaching against White supremacy.

    Police and politicians “taking a knee” in various protests are performing feel-good theater, just like the white liberal/lefties. When the smoke clears, it will be back to white business as usual.
    —————————-

    They get to listen as non-whites lecture them on how to better serve POC’s and cater to their every whim.

    Lol, you mean lectures at the trivial race window-dressing theater while the cameras are rolling? The same trivial theater than even white conservative police and politicians are participating in?

    —————————–

    They get to watch as both sides of the uniparty argue over how to best serve non-whites and illegals whilst totally ignoring their interests.

    Where is this mystical arguing over how to best “serve” non-whites? Where is this “generous” white “service” to black defendants convicted at higher rates and with more penalties than whites for the same crimes? Where is this “service” to blacks stopped and frisked by police massively more times than whites even though hard data shows whites carrying MORE guns and contraband? Examples can go on and on. Black folk must be scratching their heads at all this mysterious, alleged white “service” to them.

  149. Ace says:
    @Realist

    A contender for being an olympic Gold Medal dumbass.

    • Replies: @Realist
  150. Realist says:
    @Ace

    A contender for being an olympic Gold Medal dumbass.

    It’s in the bag.

    • LOL: Ace
  151. vot tak says:

    Obviously the white run/white dominated western “nations” are poster children for the superiority of the white “race”. The ease with which zionazia was able to completely take them over is ample testimony to that white superiority. 😀

  152. Anon[259] • Disclaimer says:

    Rational says:
    You mentioned 3 groups—the Judaists, the Oligarchs and brainwashed self-hating whites. I think the Judaists are responsible for 90% of this problem, as they control the media and the deep state, which includes our corrupt Judiaciary (even John Roberts, chief of the Supreme Court, has become a lib-barbarian, liar, fraud, writing fake left-wing opinions).

    Then “da Chews” must also be responsible for the election of white right wing hero Donald Trump. I mean they hav even “infiltrated” his family!


    Judaists use verbal and physical terrorism, such as calling patriots or any race realist white supremacists, neo-nazis, racists, getting them fired from jobs, college, and pushing them off the internet (eg. vdare is going to lose its website).

    But such verbal and physical terrorism tactics are a specialty of the “alt-right” with their trolling, impersonations, “doxxing,” phone threats and “swatting” where SWAT teams are routed to your house via bogus reports and calls to the police. And long before the internet age, old fashioned white right wingers did a brisk business in physical and verbal terrorism. Just ask their black victims in Rosewood, Tulsa and numerous other points. At one point, one of their foremost organizations, known as the KKK boasted membership in the tens of millions.


    They have set up a huge echo-chamber bombarding the goyim from 100 directions with white self-hate day in and day night to fool the white goyim into thinking that “everybody is licking the negroe’s boots, so why are you not a good dog, you racist, you hater?”

    Laughable fever-swamp ranting. Actually there is very little “self-hate” among white people, save for a pitifully trivial handful of liberal types. Part of the reason for that is that white people actually took some progressive measures to remove the worse aspects of their apartheid state, not only neutralizing much criticism, but providing the basis of things they can be proud of.


    About causes, Christianity is the biggest factor in white self-flagellation. It is the only religion that promotes worship of your enemy (the Judaists) that seek your extermination.

    Laughable nonsense. Christianity in many ways actually strengthened white credibility to speak of an advanced and enlightened civilization, as compared to the alternative snarling murder-model of racism. Millions of White Poles, Russians and other “Slavs” would have been alive today if some of that “self-flagellation” had been applied on the part of white racists further west.


    “When the LORD your God brings you into the land you are to possess and casts out the many peoples living there, you shall then slaughter them all and utterly destroy them…You shall save nothing alive that breathes…You shall make no agreements with them nor show them any mercy. You shall destroy their altars, break down their images, cut down their groves and burn their graven images with fire. For you are a holy people unto the LORD thy God and He has chosen you to be a special people above all others upon the face of the earth…” — Deutronomy 7: 1-8.

    Part of the above is formulaic hyperbole, as throughout the OT, the alleged “genocide victims” are alive and well and solidly ensconced in the promised land. In fact, the Hebrew prophets rail time and time again, in book after book, at the idolatrous practices and people in place, well after the land was supposedly fully conquered. And the Hebrew conquest, sparing numerous inhabitants as it did, put a stop to the atrocious practices of the Caananites particularly well documented child sacrifice.
    But strangely, right-wing whites have used the above religious verses frequently to carry out their brutal expansion projects, like dispossessing native peoples of their lands in the Americas and South Africa, along with the usual mass slaughter, and they did it on a massively greater scale.


    But the gullible Christians worship the evil Judaists, their exterminators as “God’s Chosen People”.

    If “da Chews” are doing extermination, they are among the most incompetent exterminators in history. Where are the “gentile death camps” for example?


    Religion can be very important in giving people a sense of racial unity, national pride, etc. The problem is that Christianity cannot do that, as it is a foreign Middle Eastern religion, based on worshiping a mythical middle-eastern dark brown man of a different race and

    OK. But how is it that northern Europe so enthusiastically adopted the teachings of this dark man, and when faithful to its tenets, produced a more humane, prosperous, literate and scientifically advanced civilization than other competitors?


    “Many Jews therefore view enthusiastic Christian believers—no matter how reliably they support Israel and American Jews—as enemies by definition,” – Judaist Michael Medved, 2009.

    If this is the case, then right-wing whites are among the worse fools and dupes. It is interesting that some of the most rabid supporters of Israel are those on the white right-wing side. And Prez Donald Trump, a right wing favorite, is a fulsome supporter hisself, so much so that some whites complain that he is in Israel’s back-pocket. Even his son-in-law is Jewish. How is it that white right-wingers so enthusiastically support someone in bed with their “sworn enemies”- da dreaded “Chews”?

  153. You stole my critique and made it far too much about Jews. )-:

  154. “Imagine being so full of yourself that you need to sell Jesus as Negro – or believe that would even make sense – or believe it would make a difference.”

    Not anymore than the determined pressing traditional belief that Jesus a benevolent white guy — and those same advocates made sure i made a difference.

    ————————————

    “But how is it that northern Europe so enthusiastically adopted the teachings of this dark man, and when faithful to its tenets, produced a more humane, prosperous, literate and scientifically advanced civilization than other competitors?”

    Laugh . . . you have a very peculiar notion of what that words means.

  155. Jiminy says:

    What I always find strange with the Jews is their love of the ghetto. Look at how they gladly put up the walls to lock themselves away, saying that it’s necessary to keep out the evil. I believe that they’re still in the process of building more walls and tunnels to complete the annexation. That’s a bizarre way of life to voluntarily imprison yourself- it’s certainly dedication to a cause.

  156. Thomasina says:

    Andrew Joyce – another exceptional article! Very well done. Thank you very much for the education and for making me think. Your work always provides so many ideas.

    You even mentioned my favourite author – Dickens. I think he was a brilliant writer too.

  157. @Enrique Cardova

    The landscape has changed.

    The passive tense gives you away.

    Who changed it?

    How did they do it?

    How do they keep their control over public opinion and large institutions?

    If you don’t ask the correct questions, you cannot get the correct answers.

  158. anonymous[375] • Disclaimer says:
    @Jake

    You are on the side of Christ-hating … … Mohammedans.

    You rely on falsehoods to make some insane point. It only means that your entire belief system is based on falsehoods.

    But, what else can be expected from a pathetic mangods-worshipping pagan. Yeah?

    • Troll: Seraphim
  159. anonymous[375] • Disclaimer says:
    @Emslander

    Christians worship only God and have been murdered in every age because of that singularity of worship.

    Christians do not worship “only God.” They worship only mangods. You know, human-like beings masquerading as “gods,” in your hallucinating minds. One ageing “father,” and his incarnated-from-himself “son.” Of course, there is another character in this mental cesspool, which you can fill in.

    These are pagan abominations which were clearly plagiarised from other older pagan faiths, like Hindooism. Consider the following;

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Triple_deity

    It is easy to use terms like “singularity,” when you are peddling deceit… the oxymoron called Monotheistic Trinitarianism.

    • Troll: Seraphim
    • Replies: @anon
  160. anon[327] • Disclaimer says:
    @anonymous

    … and
    you use manwords to express small mancriticisms.

    Welcome to life as given by God
    with man’s attempt to understand.

  161. anonymous[375] • Disclaimer says:
    @ploni almoni

    The strategic goal is set the Christians at war with Islam.

    Since you put it that way, “Islam” instead of “Muslims,” let us be clear that the war you mention has already been fought, and lost… by the Christians. Falsehood (Trinity) can never triumph against the Truth (Tawheed).

    Christians against Muslims, that is another matter. For now.

    • Troll: Seraphim
  162. correction;

    “Not anymore than the determined pressing traditional belief that Jesus a benevolent white guy — and those same advocates made sure it (a white benevolent jesus) made a difference.

  163. So you want to fight medieval madness with medieval madness and pogroms. Wonderful idea.

  164. You mention this booklet with ugly citations from the Talmud.
    The Talmud is 12 folio volumes of oral traditions, mostly relating to Jewish law, dating from the Roman period. There is good, bad and everything in between in the Talmud. Compared with other civilizations of the period, it’s not particularly unenlightened. Most of it is discussions on points of law. The Talmud gives diverging opinions and arguments pro and con any point of law from diverse “sages”, that is, the Talmud is a multiutude of contrary opinions. Most cruciually, it’s applied deductive and inductive reasoning, lots of affinities with Greek and Roman culture there.
    Learning and discussing Talmud, the most undogmatic and secular of religious text corpora, is what honed Jewish verbal intelligence (culturally certainly, maybe genetically, too, as some of you would hold). To reduce the Talmud to anti-goyish sentiment doesn’t do it justice; also, you can’t expect a text from a time when the civilized Romans had people eaten by lions for entertainment to conform to modern standards.

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply -


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Andrew Joyce Comments via RSS
PastClassics
Our Reigning Political Puppets, Dancing to Invisible Strings
The unspoken statistical reality of urban crime over the last quarter century.
Talk TV sensationalists and axe-grinding ideologues have fallen for a myth of immigrant lawlessness.