The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 Mark Weber Archive
Julius Streicher and His Notorious Anti-Jewish Weekly, Der Stürmer
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>
Julius Streicher at the witness stand before the Nuremberg “International Military Tribunal”

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Something Here
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

In the aftermath of World War II, the governments of the United States, the Soviet Union, Britain and France established an “International Military Tribunal” (IMT) to punish surviving leaders of Third Reich Germany. Its much publicized “Trial of the Major War Criminals” met and deliberated in Nuremberg from November 1945 to October 1946.

Of the men named by the Allied powers as defendants, the selection of Julius Streicher was one of the most difficult to justify. That’s because he had played no role whatsoever in planning or carrying out wartime policies of the Hitler regime. He was added to the list of “Major War Criminals” because of his international reputation as a vicious anti-Jewish writer, publicist and speaker, above all as publisher of the stridently anti-Semitic weekly, Der Stürmer (“The Stormer”). Citing articles that appeared in his paper, the Tribunal sentenced him to death for “Crimes Against Humanity.”

During this time of heated debate about the role of “hate speech” in society, and “cancel culture” suppression of offensive writings and images, Streicher’s life and death have new relevance.

Life and Career

Julius Streicher was one of nine children in the family of a schoolteacher in a village near the Bavarian city of Augsburg. Following in his father’s footsteps, he was working as a teacher when the First World War broke out in 1914. He volunteered for military service, joining the 6th Bavarian Reserve Infantry Regiment. He served four years with distinction, rising to the rank of lieutenant. He was repeatedly commended for courage, earning the Iron Cross second class and first class, as well as Austrian and Bavarian medals for bravery.

In the aftermath of the war of 1914-1918, Germany was a land of privation, violent discord, and despair. Marxist zealots, inspired by the success of Lenin and the Bolsheviks in Russia, tried to seize power. In Munich a short-lived “Bavarian Soviet Republic” headed by Eugen Leviné was established. In Nuremberg, Streicher joined a new nationalist group, the “German Socialist Party” (DSP). He soon became its most prominent activist and speaker, and succeeded in winning many supporters.

His life changed in 1922 when he attended a meeting in Munich where he first heard Adolf Hitler speak. He later described the experience:

“Now he spoke. First slowly, hardly audible, then more quickly and more powerfully, and finally with great strength … It was an amazing treasure trove of thought that came from his speech of more than three hours, clothed with the beauty of inspired language. Everyone felt it: this man spoke from a divine calling. He spoke as a messenger from heaven at a time when hell threatened to swallow up everything. And everyone understood him, with the head or the heart, men as well as women. He spoke for everyone, for the entire German people … Never before had the singing of the German anthem moved me so deeply as it did during that mass meeting where I first saw Adolf Hitler and heard him speak … I hurried through the jubilant crowd to the podium, stood before him, and said: ‘Mr. Hitler! My name is Julius Streicher. At this moment I know I can only be a follower. But you are a leader! I give to you the popular movement that I’ve built in Franconia’.”[1]Jay W. Baird, “Das politische Testament Julius Streichers,” Vierteljahrshefte für Zeitgeschichte, Jg. 26, Heft 4, 1978, pp. 682-683.

Streicher soon announced his resignation from the party he had done so much to help build, simultaneously calling on DSP members to join him in supporting Hitler’s fledgling movement. Hitler never forgot this expression of confidence and trust. In Mein Kampf he made a point of praising Streicher for his “difficult and profoundly decent” deed. Years later, Hitler recalled his importance in remarks to colleagues: “Despite all his weaknesses, he’s a man who has spirit. If we wish to tell the truth, we must recognize that, without Julius Streicher, Nuremberg would never have been won over to National Socialism. He put himself under my orders at a time when others were hesitating to do so, and he completely conquered the city … That’s an unforgettable service.”[2]Hitler’s Secret Conversations (New York: New American Library/ Signet [pb. ed.], 1961), pp. 168, 169. (Night of Dec. 28-29, 1941)

The Stürmer Weekly

In 1923 Streicher founded Der Stürmer, and in November he took part in the attempt by Hitler and his followers to seize power in Munich. Because of his role in the failed putsch, Streicher was imprisoned for a time, and dismissed from his position as a teacher. In 1924 he won election as a member of the Bavarian provincial legislature, a position he held for eight years. After Hitler’s own release from prison and the re-founding of the National Socialist Party in early 1925, he appointed Streicher as regional party chief (Gauleiter) of the Franconia area of Bavaria.

While the circulation of Der Stürmer rose sharply after the National Socialists consolidated their authority in 1933-1934, Streicher’s power remained limited to his home region. He held no position of importance outside of Franconia. Similarly, his Stürmer had no government or Party status. This independent weekly was Streicher’s private publication.

In content, style and tone, his paper was not at all typical of the weekly or daily press of Third Reich Germany. Although it proclaimed itself a “German Weekly Paper in Struggle for the Truth,” its focus was narrow. At the bottom of the front page, each Stürmer issue carried the motto in bold letters: “The Jews Are Our Misfortune.” The tone of this bluntly polemical paper was strident and one-sided. Its articles were written in sentences that were shorter than those of most German papers, and the vocabulary was more limited.

Articles often highlighted crimes committed by Jews, and especially real or alleged sexual transgressions. Such items doubtless excited the salacious curiosity of many readers, but contrary to an often-repeated claim, the paper was not pornographic. Appealing to baser emotions of jealously and envy, Stürmer articles and readers’ letters often “outed” Germans who maintained cordial relations with Jews. The paper publicized businesses, especially those owned or managed by NS Party members, that retained Jewish employees or continued friendly dealings with Jewish clients. Some of its most sensational articles were actually penned by a Jewish journalist, Jonas Wolk, who wrote for Der Stürmer from 1934 to 1938 under the name of Fritz Brand.[3]“Report of Goering’s Commission for the investigation of the Aryanisations carried out in the Gau of Franconia between 9.11.38 and 9.2.39 and the irregularities connected therewith which have been established.” Nuremberg IMT document 1757-PS (“Partial Translation”), Nazi Conspiracy and Aggression (Washington, DC: 1946), vol. 4, pp. 286-287; Prominente ohne Maske: Drittes Reich (FZ-Verlag, 1998), p. 351; Randall L. Bytwerk, Julius Streicher: Nazi Editor of the Notorious Anti-Semitic Newspaper Der Stürmer (New York: 2001), p. 60.

The paper’s vivid cartoons were probably its most distinguishing and best remembered feature. Drawn by Philipp Rupprecht (“Fips”) these striking illustrations, many of which appeared on the front page, routinely portrayed Jews as ugly and fat, with large ears, swollen lips, cynical faces, and grotesquely exaggerated “Jewish” features.

Most Germans regarded Der Stürmer as uncouth and in bad taste. Better educated and middle class Germans were especially inclined to view it with disdain. Officials of the National Socialist Party and the Third Reich government similarly regarded Streicher’s weekly with scorn and embarrassment, not least because hostile critics abroad often cited it as representative or typical of the “new Germany.”

Even with regard to the nation’s Jewish policy, the Stürmer did not reflect the attitude or outlook of the leadership of Hitler’s Party or the German government. During the prewar years, 1933-1939, higher-level government and Party officials, including SS leaders, sought to “solve” Germany’s “Jewish problem” above all through emigration.[4]Heinz Höhne, The Order of the Death’s Head [Translation of Der Orden unter dem Totenkopf], (New York: Ballantine [pb. ed.], 1984), pp. 369, 371, 374, 383-384; See also: M. Weber, “Zionism and the Third Reich,” The Journal of Historical Review, July-August 1993, pp. 29-37. SS Colonel (and later Reich Health Leader) Dr. Leonardo Conti, for example, stressed that the new Germany rejected racial hatred. The Jews, he said, were “not an inferior but a different race.”[5]H. Höhne, The Order of the Death’s Head (1984), p. 373.

Himmler’s SS organization, which played a major role in carrying out the country’s Jewish policies, rejected Streicher’s sensationalist and emotive anti-Jewish polemics. The main SS newspaper, Das Schwarze Korps, rebuked Streicher and Der Stürmer in a June 1935 article entitled “The Anti-Semitism That Causes Us Harm.”[6]Daniel Goldhagen, Hitler’s Willing Executioners: Ordinary Germans and the Holocaust. Vintage (pb. edition) 1997, p. 521, n. 165.

So offensive was Streicher’s paper to so many Germans that it was repeatedly restricted and suppressed by Third Reich authorities. Perhaps the most notorious edition of Der Stürmer was a special May 1934 “ritual murder” issue, which accused Jews of carrying out secret killings of non-Jews over centuries. A lurid front-page cartoon depicted ugly Jewish killers collecting blood from the throats of slain children. This issue prompted such widespread and vehement protests that further circulation of it was forbidden on Hitler’s orders, and undistributed copies were confiscated.[7]Berliner Tageblatt, May 18, 1934. Facsimile in: B. Distel, R. Jakusch, eds., Concentration Camp Dachau 1933-1945 (Comité International de Dachau, 1978), p. 40 (llus. 72); Prominente ohne Maske: Drittes Reich (1998), p. 351. In August 1934 a weekly issue was banned because it had libeled the Czech head of state. See: D. Irving, Nuremberg: The Last Battle (1996), pp. 79 and 329, n. 49.

Front cover of the special May 1934 “Ritual Murder” issue of Der Stürmer. The headline proclaims: “Jewish Murder Plan Against Non-Jewish Humanity Revealed.” Across the bottom of the front page is the motto: “The Jews Are Our Misfortune.”
Front cover of the special May 1934 “Ritual Murder” issue of Der Stürmer. The headline proclaims: “Jewish Murder Plan Against Non-Jewish Humanity Revealed.” Across the bottom of the front page is the motto: “The Jews Are Our Misfortune.”

On two occasions in January 1938, German police throughout the country seized editions of Der Stürmer. On January 19, copies of a regular issue were confiscated because it had sharply criticized the government for granting foreign exchange to Jews so that they could attend Jewish educational institutions in Switzerland, and because it had complained about German judges who allegedly failed to enforce the anti-Jewish Nuremberg laws. Two days later police seized all copies of a special Stürmer issue because of an article demanding the death penalty for Jews having sexual relations with (non-Jewish) German women.[8]“Stuermer is Suppressed,” The New York Times, Jan. 20, 1938, p. 8; “Another Stuermer is Seized,” The New York Times, Jan. 22, 1938, p. 2; Sarah A. Gordon, Hitler, Germans and the ‘Jewish Question’ (Princeton Univ., 1984), p. 174; Eugene Davidson, The Trial of the Germans (New York: Macmillan, 1969), p. 51.

Der Stürmer was banned from distribution within the Hitler Youth organization,[9]International Military Tribunal, Trial of the Major War Criminals Before the International Military Tribunal (Nuremberg: 1947-1949 [IMT “blue series”]), vol. 14, pp. 420, 421 (Testimony of Baldur von Schirach, May 24, 1946); IMT, vol. 18, p. 210; W. Schütz, ed., Lexikon: Deutsche Geschichte im 20. Jahrhundert (Rosenheim: DVG, 1990), p. 446. and in October 1938 the German Army High Command officially deemed the paper unsuitable for German military servicemen, and banned it from distribution within its branches.[10]“Erstaunliche Information zum Holocaust, Deutsche Wochen-Zeitung, Feb. 28, 1997, p. 13. Source cited: H. Stern (ed.), KZ-Lügen: Antwort auf Goldhagen (Munich: FZ-Verlag, 1997); Prominente ohne Maske: Drittes Reich (FZ-Verlag, 1998), p. 351. After Hitler and his Party consolidated power in Germany, Streicher was given no opportunity to speak on German radio, nor was he ever invited to contribute to any leading German newspaper. He was never consulted about national affairs, not even with regard to the regime’s Jewish policy.[11]IMT, Trial of the Major War Criminals Before the International Military Tribunal, pp. 211, 214, 215, 216 (Plea by attorney Dr. Marx, July 12, 1946)

Influential journalists in the Third Reich press and key officials in Hitler’s government regarded Streicher and his paper with contempt. This point was made emphatically by Hans Fritzsche, a prominent journalist and high-ranking official in Goebbels’ Propaganda Ministry, whose voice was familiar to millions through his radio news commentaries. In testimony before the Nuremberg Tribunal, he said:

“My colleagues and I, in the press and radio, without exception I would say, rejected Der Stürmer radically. During a period of 13 years of regular radio broadcasts reviewing the press I never quoted that paper. It was never quoted in the German press either. The [Stürmer] editors did not belong to the professional journalists’ organization, and its publisher did not belong to the publishers’ organization … I tried twice to ban Der Stürmer. I was not successful … I wanted to ban the Stürmer, not only because the mere verbatim reproduction of a page of the Stürmer was the most effective anti-German propaganda of all, but I wanted to ban Der Stürmer simply for reasons of good taste. I wanted to ban it as a source of radicalism against which I fought wherever I met it …”[12]Hans Fritzsche testimony of June 27, 1946. English text: IMT, Trial of the Major War Criminals Before the International Military Tribunal (1947-1949), vol. 17, p. 166.

Hitler’s secretary, Martin Bormann, came close to issuing an order in 1939 to shut down Streicher’s paper entirely.[13]IMT, Trial of the Major War Criminals … , vol. 12, p. 329. (Apr. 29, 1946); Reichsmarschall Hermann Göring also took measures against the paper. See: Joachim C. Fest, The Face of the Third Reich (1970), p. 326, n. 8. In 1939 Streicher was prohibited from making public speeches, by order of Hitler issued through his Deputy Rudolf Hess.[14]IMT, Trial of the Major War Criminals … , vol. 12, p. 321, 329, and, IMT, Trial …, vol. 18, p. 203, 204; Prominente ohne Maske: Drittes Reich (1998), p. 351.

Julius Streicher in 1935
Julius Streicher in 1935

By 1939 accusations of misconduct against Streicher by prominent Party officials became so numerous and substantial that he requested a formal investigation of them by the Party’s own internal judicial commission – naturally with the expectation that he would be exonerated. In February 1940 this “Party Court” looked into the allegations, including claims that he had illegally enriched himself with property taken from Jews. However, the evidence consisted of contradictory testimony and statements, and the Party commission was unable to reach a definitive conclusion. All the same, Streicher was removed from all official posts.[15]Karl Höffkes, Hitlers politische Generale: Die Gauleiter des Dritten Reiches (Grabert, 1986), pp. 333, 335-337; Prominente ohne Maske: Drittes Reich (FZ-Verlag, 1998), p. 351; David Irving contends that Streicher was probably innocent of the charges against him. D. Irving, Nuremberg: The Last Battle (1996), p. 329, n. 51.

It was perhaps due to Hitler’s abiding gratitude for Streicher’s loyalty and support during the difficult early years that he was permitted to nominally retain his title as Gauleiter, and to continue publishing his Stürmer weekly. Some months after his dismissal, Hitler remarked to colleagues about the Party’s internal investigation of him and its outcome:

“When all’s said, it was the Gauleiters themselves who asked me to be indulgent with Streicher. In all the circumstances, there was no comparison between the faults he committed and his recognized merits, which were brilliant … If one day I write my memoirs, I shall have to recognize that this man fought like a buffalo in our cause. The conquest of Franconia was his work. I have a bad conscience when I get the feeling that I’ve not been quite fair to somebody … I can’t help thinking that, in comparison with so many services, the reasons for Streicher’s dismissal are really very slender.”[16]Hitler’s Secret Conversations (1961), pp. 168, 169. (Night of Dec. 28-29, 1941); See also the Goebbels diary entry of Jan. 25, 1942. Louis P. Lochner, ed., The Goebbels Diaries 1942-1943 (Doubleday, 1948), p. 47.

After he was stripped of all authority, Streicher lived from 1940 until the end of the war at his rural home. His Stürmer also lost influence as its circulation fell drastically during the war years.[17]IMT, Trial of the Major War Criminals … , vol. 18, p. 204; The Stürmer’s circulation fell sharply during the war years, to 150,000 or even to a negligible 15,000, Telford Taylor wrote in Anatomy of the Nuremberg Trials (pages 379, 481, 590).

Nuremberg

In May 1945, a few weeks after the end of the war, Streicher was taken prisoner by American troops. While in US military custody, he was kicked, whipped, spat at, forced to drink saliva, and burned with cigarettes. His genitals were beaten. Eyebrow and chest hair were pulled out. He was stripped naked and photographed.[18]Werner Maser, Nuremberg: A Nation on Trial (Scribner, 1979), pp. 51-52, 47, 60; B. Steidle (comp.), Verheimlichte Dokumente, Band 2 (FZ-Verlag, 1995), pp. 219-221; Keith Stimely, “The Torture of Julius Streicher,” The Journal of Historical Review, Spring 1984 (Vol. 5, No. 1), pp. 106-119; David Irving, Nuremberg: The Last Battle (1996), pp. 51-52, 325, n. 27, 28. See also: M. Weber, “The Nuremberg Trials and the Holocaust,” The Journal of Historical Review, Summer 1992 (Vol. 12, No. 2), pages 167-213; Rupert Butler, Legions of Death (England: 1983), pp. 238-239; Montgomery Belgion, Victor’s Justice (Regnery, 1949), p. 90. He was later taken to Nuremberg to join other former Third Reich figures as defendants before the International Military Tribunal. Gustave Gilbert, the Jewish-born US military officer who was the IMT prison psychologist, administered tests to the defendants to determine their intelligence levels. Streicher’s IQ was found to be the lowest: 106, or just slightly above average.

The lawyer who was assigned to defend Streicher was Dr. Hanns Marx. Although the two men had little regard for each other, and Streicher openly expressed distrust of his attorney, Marx handled remarkably well what he rightly called a “difficult and thankless task.”[19]IMT, Trial of the Major War Criminals … , vol. 18, p. 217.

Streicher, he emphasized, was a defendant not because of any actual crimes he had committed, but rather because of his international reputation as “Enemy Number One of the Jews.” We are told, Marx went on, that Streicher was “not only the greatest hater of the Jews and the greatest preacher of extermination of the Jews, but also the person whose direct influence one could trace back the extermination of European Jewry.” In reality, the attorney told the Tribunal, “the picture drawn of him by the Prosecution does not correspond in any way with the actual facts.”[20]IMT, Trial of the Major War Criminals … , vol. 18, pp. 190-191, 211.

“Neither by virtue of his personality nor measured by his offices and positions,” Marx said, “does he [Streicher] belong to the circle of leaders of the NSDAP [National Socialist Party] or to the Party’s decisive personalities.” The influence of his paper was also quite limited. “Even in Party circles,” Dr. Marx pointed out, “demands were made that Der Stürmer should be discontinued entirely; or at least that its illustrations, style and tone should be altered … It was looked upon by the Party and State administration, in contrast to all papers which were considered to be of any importance, as a private paper belonging to a private writer.”[21]IMT, Trial of the Major War Criminals … , vol. 18, pp. 191, 201, 202.

After 1938, Marx noted, Streicher “had no connections whatsoever with Hitler, by whom he had been completely cast off … If the defendant Streicher had really been the man the Prosecution believes him to be, his influence and his activity would have increased automatically with the intensification of the fight against the Jews. His career would not have ended, as it actually did, in political powerlessness and banishment from the scene of action, but with the commission to carry out the destruction of Jewry.”[22]IMT, Trial of the Major War Criminals … , vol. 18, pp. 204, 217.

During his own testimony before the Tribunal, Streicher mentioned his mistreatment by US military personnel while being held prisoner. At the request of the US prosecutor, those remarks were stricken from the court record.[23]“Streicher Case Opens,” The Times (London), April 27, 1946, p. 3; Eugene Davidson, The Trial of the Germans (New York: Macmillan, 1969), p. 51.

Alone of the Nuremberg defendants, Streicher was held to be culpable solely for views he held and disseminated, rather than for anything he had actually done.[24]IMT, Trial of the Major War Criminals … , vol. 12, p. 322 (April 28, 1946) However, no evidence was presented to the Tribunal proving that Streicher’s writings or his paper had contributed, directly or even indirectly, to killings of Jews. Allied prosecutors were unable to present witness testimony or any other evidence establishing that reading Der Stürmer actually encouraged anyone to commit any specific crime. In short, no proof was presented to show that any writing, speech or cartoon for which Streicher was responsible had motived or inspired even one killing.

The Allied prosecutors had difficulty showing that the defendant ever wished for the physical extermination of the Jews. Streicher, Dr. Marx said, “always had in mind an international solution of the Jewish question; he did not favor a German or even European partial solution and rejected it. That was why he suggested, in an editorial in Der Stürmer in the year 1941, that the French island of Madagascar should be considered as a place of settlement for the Jews. Consequently, he did not see the final solution of the Jewish question in the physical extermination of the Jews, but in their resettlement.”[26]Testimony of Adele Streicher, April 29 1946, afternoon. Moreover, the prosecutors were unable to show that Streicher had known of mass killings of Jews until late in the war. Adele Streicher testified that her husband first learned of large-scale killings of Jews only in 1944 through items published in the Swiss Jewish weekly paper to which he subscribed.

His wife, Adele, was similarly emphatic on this point. “From all conversations with Julius Streicher,” she testified, “I can say with certainty that he never thought of the solution of the Jewish question in terms of violence, but wanted the emigration of the Jews from Europe, and their settlement outside of Europe.”[25]IMT, Trial of the Major War Criminals … , vol. 18, p. 197 (Dr. Marx plea, July 12, 1946)

In his final statement before the Tribunal, Streicher reaffirmed his plea of innocence:

“At the beginning of this trial I was asked by the President whether I pleaded guilty in the sense of the indictment. I answered that question in the negative. The now-completed proceedings and the evidence presented have confirmed the correctness of the statement I gave at that time … It has also been established that in many articles in my weekly paper, the Stürmer, I advocated the Zionist demand for the creation of a Jewish state as the natural solution of the Jewish problem. These facts prove that I did not want the Jewish question to be solved by violence. If I, or other authors, mentioned a destruction or extermination of Jewry in some articles of my weekly paper, the Stürmer, then these were strongly worded statements in response to provocative expressions of opinion by Jewish writers, in which the extermination of the German people was demanded … I repudiate the mass killings that were carried out, in the same way that they are repudiated by every decent German … Neither in my capacity as Gauleiter, nor as political writer, have I committed a crime, and I therefore look forward to your judgment with a good conscience.”[27]From Streicher’s final plea at the IMT, August 31, 1946.

The Tribunal judges were unmoved by any of this. They declared him guilty of “Crimes Against Humanity” and sentenced him to death by hanging. In justifying their verdict, the judges declared: “Streicher’s incitement to murder and extermination at the time when Jews in the East were being killed under the most horrible conditions clearly constitutes persecution on political and racial grounds in connection with War Crimes, as defined by the Charter, and constitutes a crime against humanity.”

Just before he was put to death on Oct. 16, 1945, the 61-year-old Streicher cried out “Now I go to God. Purim festival 1946” – thereby comparing the hangings at Nuremberg with those of enemies of the Jews in ancient Persia, as related in the Old Testament book of Esther, an event that Jews have celebrated ever since in annual “Purim” festivities.

Of the twelve death sentences handed down by the Tribunal, the Streicher hanging was one of the more difficult to justify. For one thing, “Crimes Against Humanity,” as defined in the Tribunal’s own Charter, mentioned only acts or deeds, not speech, writings or publications.

Even at the time, some eminent Americans were troubled by the Streicher verdict. Perhaps the most important was Telford Taylor, a US Army officer who served with the American prosecution team at the Nuremberg IMT trial, and then as prosecution Chief Counsel at the twelve subsequent American-run Nuremberg “NMT” trials.

In his book, Anatomy of the Nuremberg Trials, written and published years later, Taylor wrote that he “(and many others) thought his [Streicher’s] case one of the most debatable.” He pointed out that Streicher’s “incitement,” at least before the outbreak of war in 1939, was not a crime. And during the war, he had been all but banished – deprived of any official status or power, while the influence of his paper had become negligible. Streicher’s attorney, Taylor noted, “made a very strong argument that the defendant could have little or no impact on the situation and fate of the Jews.” It’s true, Taylor acknowledged, that “a few issues of Der Stürmer contained articles calling for extermination of Jews, but its ‘incitement’ was surely imperceptible.” The Tribunal, he wrote, failed to carefully consider “the sole and (difficult) legal issue” in this case, that is “whether or not ‘incitement’ was a sufficient basis for conviction.”[28]Telford Taylor, The Anatomy of the Nuremberg Trials: A Personal Memoir (Skyhorse, 2013 [originally published by Knopf Doubleday, 1992]), pp. 496, 481, 376.

“It is hard to condone the Tribunal’s unthinking and callous handling of the Streicher case,” Taylor wrote. Streicher was put to death, he suggested, not because he was a war criminal, but because of his odious demeanor and reputation. Far from being well considered or just, Taylor concluded, “the Tribunal’s opinion had been superficial, perhaps influenced both by his [Streicher’s] repulsive appearance and by the likelihood of a negative public reaction if Streicher got anything less than the worst.”[29]T. Taylor, The Anatomy of the Nuremberg Trials (2013), pp. 631, 599.

Taylor was particularly critical of the Tribunal’s two American Judges: Francis Biddle, who had been a US Attorney General, and John J. Parker, the US Alternate. “All the judges, but especially Biddle and Parker, nurtured in constitutional guarantees of liberty unfamiliar to their colleagues, were to blame” for “the Tribunal’s hasty and unthinking treatment of the Streicher case.”[30]T. Taylor, The Anatomy of the Nuremberg Trials (2013), p. 562. Taylor added: “The carefree way in which the Tribunal members sent him to the gallows, as if they were stamping on a worm, is especially hard to condone.”

Other Americans were dismayed by the entire Nuremberg enterprise, and particularly by their country’s role in it. They were troubled that the US was sanctioning proceedings that violated ancient and fundamental principles of justice. The victorious Allies acted as prosecutor, judge and executioner of the German leaders. The charges were created especially for the occasion, and were applied only to the vanquished. The Tribunal thus acted on the basis of “ex post facto” law, which is prohibited by the US Constitution.

America’s leading jurist, US Supreme Court Chief Justice Harlan Fiske Stone, remarked at the time: “[Chief US prosecutor Robert] Jackson is away conducting his high-grade lynching party in Nuremberg. I don’t mind what he does to the Nazis, but I hate to see the pretense that he is running a court and proceeding according to common law. This is a little too sanctimonious a fraud to meet my old-fashioned ideas.”[31]Alpheus T. Mason, Harlan Fiske Stone: Pillar of the Law (New York: Viking, 1956), p. 716. In a private letter, Stone wrote: “… I wonder how some of those who preside at the trials would justify some of the acts of their own governments if they were placed in the status of the accused.”

Probably the most prominent condemnation of the Nuremberg Tribunal was by US Senator Robert A. Taft, widely regarded as the “conscience of the Republican party.” At considerable risk to his career, he denounced the Nuremberg enterprise in an October 1946 speech. “The trial of the vanquished by the victors cannot be impartial no matter how it is hedged about with the forms of justice,” he said.

“About this whole judgment there is the spirit of vengeance, and vengeance is seldom justice,” Taft continued. “The hanging of the eleven men convicted will be a blot on the American record which we will long regret. In these trials we have accepted the Russian idea of the purpose of trials – government policy and not justice – with little relation to Anglo-Saxon heritage. By clothing policy in the forms of legal procedure, we may discredit the whole idea of justice in Europe for years to come.”[32]Taft address delivered at Kenyon College, Ohio, Oct. 5, 1946. Vital Speeches of the Day, Nov. 1, 1946, p. 47. Taft’s devotion to principle in defiance of both popular and “educated” opinion impressed John F. Kennedy, who praised the Ohio senator’s stand in his award-winning best seller, Profiles in Courage. Similar views were expressed by other distinguished Americans. US Supreme Court Justice William O. Douglas later wrote: “I thought at the time and still think that the Nuremberg trials were unprincipled. Law was created ex post facto to suit the passion and clamor of the time.” See: H. K. Thompson and H. Strutz, eds., Dönitz at Nuremberg: A Reappraisal (IHR, 1983), p. 196. For more on this, see: M. Weber, “The Nuremberg Trials and the Holocaust,” The Journal of Historical Review, Summer 1992 (Vol. 12, No. 2), pages 167-213.

Enduring Relevance

However detestable Streicher and his paper may be, similar publications have long been legal in the United States. For more than two centuries, writings and images that are offensive, demeaning and hateful, or even that condone or arguably encourage violence, have been constitutionally protected. In 1976 and again in 1983 the “New Christian Crusade Church” in Louisiana issued an American edition, in English translation, of the notorious 1934 “ritual murder” issue of Der Stürmer – complete with eight graphic illustrations from the original, including the lurid front-page cartoon.[33]A 1983 reprint of the 1976 “Julius Streicher Memorial Edition,” issued by the “New Christian Crusade Church” of Metairie, Louisiana, is in the IHR archives. This reprint of perhaps the most infamous Stürmer issue has been given more solid legal protection in the United States than the original was given in Third Reich Germany.

As Telford Taylor suggested, the American officials who helped put Julius Streicher to death were more eager to act in accord with the “popular” and fashionable sentiment of the times than to uphold their own country’s legal standards. In a sense, they were forerunners of Americans of our own era who similarly seek to suppress “hateful” or allegedly inflammatory rhetoric, writings and imagery.

About the Author

Mark Weber is an American historian, author, and current affairs analyst. He studied history at the University of Illinois (Chicago), the University of Munich (Germany), Portland State University, and Indiana University (M.A., 1977).

Endnotes

[1] Jay W. Baird, “Das politische Testament Julius Streichers,” Vierteljahrshefte für Zeitgeschichte, Jg. 26, Heft 4, 1978, pp. 682-683.

[2] Hitler’s Secret Conversations (New York: New American Library/ Signet [pb. ed.], 1961), pp. 168, 169. (Night of Dec. 28-29, 1941)

[3] “Report of Goering’s Commission for the investigation of the Aryanisations carried out in the Gau of Franconia between 9.11.38 and 9.2.39 and the irregularities connected therewith which have been established.” Nuremberg IMT document 1757-PS (“Partial Translation”), Nazi Conspiracy and Aggression (Washington, DC: 1946), vol. 4, pp. 286-287; Prominente ohne Maske: Drittes Reich (FZ-Verlag, 1998), p. 351; Randall L. Bytwerk, Julius Streicher: Nazi Editor of the Notorious Anti-Semitic Newspaper Der Stürmer (New York: 2001), p. 60.

[4] Heinz Höhne, The Order of the Death’s Head [Translation of Der Orden unter dem Totenkopf], (New York: Ballantine [pb. ed.], 1984), pp. 369, 371, 374, 383-384; See also: M. Weber, “Zionism and the Third Reich,” The Journal of Historical Review, July-August 1993, pp. 29-37.

[5] H. Höhne, The Order of the Death’s Head (1984), p. 373.

[6] Daniel Goldhagen, Hitler’s Willing Executioners: Ordinary Germans and the Holocaust. Vintage (pb. edition) 1997, p. 521, n. 165.

[7] Berliner Tageblatt, May 18, 1934. Facsimile in: B. Distel, R. Jakusch, eds., Concentration Camp Dachau 1933-1945 (Comité International de Dachau, 1978), p. 40 (llus. 72); Prominente ohne Maske: Drittes Reich (1998), p. 351. In August 1934 a weekly issue was banned because it had libeled the Czech head of state. See: D. Irving, Nuremberg: The Last Battle (1996), pp. 79 and 329, n. 49.

[8] “Stuermer is Suppressed,” The New York Times, Jan. 20, 1938, p. 8; “Another Stuermer is Seized,” The New York Times, Jan. 22, 1938, p. 2; Sarah A. Gordon, Hitler, Germans and the ‘Jewish Question’ (Princeton Univ., 1984), p. 174; Eugene Davidson, The Trial of the Germans (New York: Macmillan, 1969), p. 51.

[9] International Military Tribunal, Trial of the Major War Criminals Before the International Military Tribunal (Nuremberg: 1947-1949 [IMT “blue series”]), vol. 14, pp. 420, 421 (Testimony of Baldur von Schirach, May 24, 1946); IMT, vol. 18, p. 210; W. Schütz, ed., Lexikon: Deutsche Geschichte im 20. Jahrhundert (Rosenheim: DVG, 1990), p. 446.

[10] “Erstaunliche Information zum Holocaust, Deutsche Wochen-Zeitung, Feb. 28, 1997, p. 13. Source cited: H. Stern (ed.), KZ-Lügen: Antwort auf Goldhagen (Munich: FZ-Verlag, 1997); Prominente ohne Maske: Drittes Reich (FZ-Verlag, 1998), p. 351.

[11] IMT, Trial of the Major War Criminals Before the International Military Tribunal, pp. 211, 214, 215, 216 (Plea by attorney Dr. Marx, July 12, 1946)

[12] Hans Fritzsche testimony of June 27, 1946. English text: IMT, Trial of the Major War Criminals Before the International Military Tribunal (1947-1949), vol. 17, p. 166.

[13] IMT, Trial of the Major War Criminals … , vol. 12, p. 329. (Apr. 29, 1946); Reichsmarschall Hermann Göring also took measures against the paper. See: Joachim C. Fest, The Face of the Third Reich (1970), p. 326, n. 8.

[14] IMT, Trial of the Major War Criminals … , vol. 12, p. 321, 329, and, IMT, Trial …, vol. 18, p. 203, 204; Prominente ohne Maske: Drittes Reich (1998), p. 351.

[15] Karl Höffkes, Hitlers politische Generale: Die Gauleiter des Dritten Reiches (Grabert, 1986), pp. 333, 335-337; Prominente ohne Maske: Drittes Reich (FZ-Verlag, 1998), p. 351; David Irving contends that Streicher was probably innocent of the charges against him. D. Irving, Nuremberg: The Last Battle (1996), p. 329, n. 51.

[16] Hitler’s Secret Conversations (1961), pp. 168, 169. (Night of Dec. 28-29, 1941); See also the Goebbels diary entry of Jan. 25, 1942. Louis P. Lochner, ed., The Goebbels Diaries 1942-1943 (Doubleday, 1948), p. 47.

[17] IMT, Trial of the Major War Criminals … , vol. 18, p. 204; The Stürmer’s circulation fell sharply during the war years, to 150,000 or even to a negligible 15,000, Telford Taylor wrote in Anatomy of the Nuremberg Trials (pages 379, 481, 590).

[18] Werner Maser, Nuremberg: A Nation on Trial (Scribner, 1979), pp. 51-52, 47, 60; B. Steidle (comp.), Verheimlichte Dokumente, Band 2 (FZ-Verlag, 1995), pp. 219-221; Keith Stimely, “The Torture of Julius Streicher,” The Journal of Historical Review, Spring 1984 (Vol. 5, No. 1), pp. 106-119; David Irving, Nuremberg: The Last Battle (1996), pp. 51-52, 325, n. 27, 28. See also: M. Weber, “The Nuremberg Trials and the Holocaust,” The Journal of Historical Review, Summer 1992 (Vol. 12, No. 2), pages 167-213; Rupert Butler, Legions of Death (England: 1983), pp. 238-239; Montgomery Belgion, Victor’s Justice (Regnery, 1949), p. 90.

[19] IMT, Trial of the Major War Criminals … , vol. 18, p. 217.

[20] IMT, Trial of the Major War Criminals … , vol. 18, pp. 190-191, 211.

[21] IMT, Trial of the Major War Criminals … , vol. 18, pp. 191, 201, 202.

[22] IMT, Trial of the Major War Criminals … , vol. 18, pp. 204, 217.

[23] “Streicher Case Opens,” The Times (London), April 27, 1946, p. 3; Eugene Davidson, The Trial of the Germans (New York: Macmillan, 1969), p. 51.

[24] IMT, Trial of the Major War Criminals … , vol. 12, p. 322 (April 28, 1946)

[25] IMT, Trial of the Major War Criminals … , vol. 18, p. 197 (Dr. Marx plea, July 12, 1946)

[26] Testimony of Adele Streicher, April 29 1946, afternoon. Moreover, the prosecutors were unable to show that Streicher had known of mass killings of Jews until late in the war. Adele Streicher testified that her husband first learned of large-scale killings of Jews only in 1944 through items published in the Swiss Jewish weekly paper to which he subscribed.

[27] From Streicher’s final plea at the IMT, August 31, 1946.

[28] Telford Taylor, The Anatomy of the Nuremberg Trials: A Personal Memoir (Skyhorse, 2013 [originally published by Knopf Doubleday, 1992]), pp. 496, 481, 376.

[29] T. Taylor, The Anatomy of the Nuremberg Trials (2013), pp. 631, 599.

[30] T. Taylor, The Anatomy of the Nuremberg Trials (2013), p. 562. Taylor added: “The carefree way in which the Tribunal members sent him to the gallows, as if they were stamping on a worm, is especially hard to condone.”

[31] Alpheus T. Mason, Harlan Fiske Stone: Pillar of the Law (New York: Viking, 1956), p. 716. In a private letter, Stone wrote: “… I wonder how some of those who preside at the trials would justify some of the acts of their own governments if they were placed in the status of the accused.”

[32] Taft address delivered at Kenyon College, Ohio, Oct. 5, 1946. Vital Speeches of the Day, Nov. 1, 1946, p. 47. Taft’s devotion to principle in defiance of both popular and “educated” opinion impressed John F. Kennedy, who praised the Ohio senator’s stand in his award-winning best seller, Profiles in Courage. Similar views were expressed by other distinguished Americans. US Supreme Court Justice William O. Douglas later wrote: “I thought at the time and still think that the Nuremberg trials were unprincipled. Law was created ex post facto to suit the passion and clamor of the time.” See: H. K. Thompson and H. Strutz, eds., Dönitz at Nuremberg: A Reappraisal (IHR, 1983), p. 196. For more on this, see: M. Weber, “The Nuremberg Trials and the Holocaust,” The Journal of Historical Review, Summer 1992 (Vol. 12, No. 2), pages 167-213.

[33] A 1983 reprint of the 1976 “Julius Streicher Memorial Edition,” issued by the “New Christian Crusade Church” of Metairie, Louisiana, is in the IHR archives.

(Republished from IHR.org by permission of author or representative)
 
Hide 202 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. Right_On says:

    Excellent piece; well done. Victor’s justice indeed.
    For those interested in the Nuremberg Trial, I highly recommend Maurice Bardèche’s Nuremberg or the Promised Land. (1948)
    “The true basis for the Nuremberg Trial, the one which no one has ever dared to point out, is, I suspect, not fear: it is the spectacle of the ruins, it is the panic of the victors. It is necessary that the others be in the wrong. It is necessary, for if, by chance, they had not been monsters, how would the victors bear the weight of all those destroyed cities, and those thousands of phosphorus bombs? It is the horror, it is the despair of the victors which is the true motive for the trial. They have veiled their faces before what they were forced to do and, to give themselves courage, they transformed their massacres into a crusade. They invented, a posteriori, a right to massacre in the name of respect for humanity. Being killers, they promoted themselves to policemen.”

  2. @Right_On

    Though he fought in a different theater, General Le May’s words ring loud.

    “If we’d lost the war, we’d all have been prosecuted as war criminals”

    • Replies: @Mulga Mumblebrain
  3. @Right_On

    Thanks for that relevant quote, and thanks to the author for an interesting essay. The Allies were generally speaking far worse than the Germans. The US/UK killed more civilians bombing France than the Germans did bombing the UK. Part of the reason the Germans fought to the bitter end in 1944 and 1945 is because they remembered what peace looked like in 1919 with a starvation blockade still in place. They knew they were fighting a vicious, powerful, evil foe in the form of the Jewish Banksters and their treasonous goy accomplices.

    I have to shake my head at the older generations who bemoan the wokeness and liberal perversion we are seeing today, and yet glorify WW2 and America as the “land of the free” . The same group that profited from ww2 is the same one pushing the cultural destruction. Although many individuals themselves are not guilty, generally speaking it is fare to say that the chickens are coming home to roost in the USA. The Americans (and brits and soviets) murdered the men, woman, and children of Germany (and others) on behalf of the demonic Juden, and now their children are reaping the reward.

  4. neutral says:

    The jew fears nothing more than those that have the courage to mention just how vile the jew truly is. Sadly even amongst senior members of the Third Reich there was a fear of what the “international community” would think of them, they should have known better that “international community” simply implied international jew, and that the jew only tolerate utter submission from their goyim thralls.

    • Replies: @Fr. John
    , @Miha
  5. My father in law was upset by execution of General Bock. I do not know why?
    He was telling that before execution all were given Laxative in food. I do not know if it is true.

    • Agree: Pheasant
  6. Wally says:

    The most basic problem with the Nuremberg Show Trials is that people were hung for ‘mass exterminations of Jews” when there was no such “exterminations”.
    There simply is no proof that there was. In fact, the claims themselves are impossible.

    The Show Trials are covered well here:
    Nuremberg – Fair Trial or Show Trial ?: https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=11053

    I remind everyone that Mark Weber, once a revisionist only interested in the truth has caved. Weber, like David Irving, now tries to play what has been referred to as “holocaust-lite”, for which there is no more proof than there is for the full on “holocaust” Big Lie.
    recommended (in 2 parts):
    Mark Weber: Squishy Semi-Revisionist Shirker:: https://codoh.com/library/document/mark-weber-squishy-semi-revisionist-shirker-part/en/
    also recommended:
    Talking Frankly about David Irving, A Critical Analysis of David Irving’s Statement on the Holocaust, by Hadding Scott: https://codoh.com/library/document/talking-frankly-about-david-irving/en/
    discussion: https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=10391

    • Agree: Curmudgeon
    • Thanks: GeeBee, profnasty
    • Replies: @Hans
    , @Connect-I-Cut
  7. Vaterland says:
    @Right_On

    I seriously doubt there was any moral panicking and necessity to justify anything. The war was carefully planned and mass extermination of the German civilian population precisely prepared, then executed. Nizer spoke with cold logic and easiness about his compatriots’ plans of the extermination of the entire German race, Patton boasted laughingly in public about all the cities whose names he couldn’t pronounce, but whose places he had removed. There were of course passages in his diaries of the scenery giving him the blues and all that, but those were private thoughts which had no political consequences. There was no moral panicking when the Morgenthau Plan was presented either; or the Hooton and Kaufman Plan. And if West Germany hadn’t been needed as a buffer zone and meat shield against the Soviet Union, many more million would have most likely been massacred through the post-War policies – equally true for East-Germany and Stalin. There also was no moral panic when Jews tried to poison six million German civilians, the group was called “The Avengers” (comic superhero group name probably not a coincidence given how Jewish the industry and their creators are), but the British police did stop it to their credit. Many Western Allies atrocities seem to have been political decisions and not by the military leaders – with the prominent exception of Eisenhauer and the Rheinwiesen-Lager. And those political circles were anti-German, largely Jewish and ready for anything. Finally there were no human rights qualms to strangle old Rudolf Hess to death.

    The mass-extermination of German civilians was a consequence of conscious political decisions, and die Nürnberger Prozesse not a spontaneous panic reaction, but equally meticulously planned. I appreciate Soviet honesty: Stalin just wanted to shoot everyone afaik. The Americans, then as today, needed to bind a bow tie into the Hangman’s rope so to speak.

    Incidentally I did think of precisely Der Stürmer recently. If Unz’ motivation is to trigger his co-ethnics, Der Stürmer originals would have made a nice reprint, if they weren’t too low brow. Even though it was in no way representative of the time, the regime, or what its leaders planned and thought – just like the current “Nazifrog” trolls aren’t. The films of the 3rd Reich are a better indication of the Zeitgeist. Nevertheless it is quite an achievement to enrage these world criminals so much, that they have you hanged even though you never killed anyone. A life-time achievement.

  8. In May 1945, a few weeks after the end of the war, Streicher was taken prisoner by American troops. While in US military custody, he was kicked, whipped, spat at, forced to drink saliva, and burned with cigarettes. His genitals were beaten. Eyebrow and chest hair were pulled out. He was stripped naked and photographed

    Huwhite brotherhood of huwhite nationalism right there.

    Julius Streicher only ever exposed the kikes, and the amerimutts couldn’t and still can’t stand it.
    God is right in setting in motions the events that lead to the current destruction if muttmerica. Filthy, demonic anti christ shithole.

    With how BLM and antifa are going, soon the amerimutts will enjoy their own kangaroo trial. Afterwards, niggers will bulldoze (((arlington))) and spics will blast (((mount rushmore))) to dust.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  9. GMC says:

    Things haven’t changed, from the point of Streicher’s hanging , that is . Today, Germany has the same Judicial system or so I’ve read. The only difference, maybe, is Streicher would be sent to prison for life. And after all that was said and done, the Jews really never moved to Israel { even with the trillions given to them} and we are stuck with the same Zionist Game . Should have given them the USA instead of Israel . lol This was a surprise article – Thanks R U.

  10. Franz says:

    It was this sort of thing that destroyed Robert A. Taft’s reputation in his own party, sad to say.

    The ‘Mister Republican” of his era, Bob Taft of Ohio also quite brazenly voted against the Civil Rights Act of 1964. It was a shocker to everyone except the people who knew him in his home state. By that time Taft and his limited government agenda were on the way out — so maybe they didn’t think it mattered.

    There is always a suspicion that if Eisenhower had not been drafted by the Republicans in 1952 to elbow Taft and his sort of conservatism aside, he might just have made it. Russell Kirk’s book The Political Principles of Robert A. Taft shows what sort of world we might have had if the fates had chosen old Bob instead of Ike.

    But Taft was his own man. After WWII men of that sort were not welcome in American political life.

  11. I highly recommend Maurice Bardèche’s Nuremberg or the Promised Land. (1948)

    Available on Internet Archive, both English and French versions:

    https://archive.org/details/bardeche-nuremberg-or-the-promised-land-1948/page/44/mode/2up

    https://archive.org/details/nurembergfini

  12. @Zarathustra

    With all the other henious the kikes and other golems do on the regular basis, it is not so ridiculous.

  13. @stevennonemaker88

    Just like with mobster scum, God is really laying the punishment where it hurts the most. You can’t expect to build families and a legacy on blood money and then get away with it.

    All allies scum and the demonic kikes are already suffering, from having faggot sons and whore daughters. And their countries will soon be drowned by a brown and black tide. God said he wouldn’t use water anymore. He really doesn’t, LOL

    • Troll: GeneralRipper
    • Replies: @Irish Savant
    , @Marckus
  14. @HeebHunter

    Well yes but the blame lies overwhelmingly with the Jews and their bought/compromised goyische enablers. The overwhelming majority of Americans were – and remain – blissfully unaware of the real story. The axe you refer to will fall on them for sure but not on the top criminals who’ll escape with their loot intact.

    • Replies: @HeebHunter
  15. Andrew Anglin and…Nick Fuentes?

    Anglin is a degenerate, but slowly he ascends from the muck into which he was born.

    Fuentes is truly promising. His ability to summon the truth for hours a night gives me much hope. And he is so young. We have years yet to see him refined.

  16. gotmituns says:

    Anti jewish feelings towards the Jews go back to before the days of Luther (“The Jews and Their Lies”). If the jews hadn’t cheated the German peasantry like they did for so many years, maybe the German’s would have felt differently towards them.

    • Replies: @Arthur MacBride
  17. We should also remember William Joyce (Lord Haw-Haw), an Irish American citizen executed after a show trial at the Old Bailey.

    His last words should be remembered also.

    “In death as in life, I defy the Jews who caused this last war, and I defy the power of darkness which they represent. I warn the British people against the crushing imperialism of the Soviet Union. May Britain be great once again and in the hour of the greatest danger in the West may the standard be raised from the dust, crowned with the words – “You have conquered nevertheless”. I am proud to die for my ideals and I am sorry for the sons of Britain who have died without knowing why”

  18. gent says:
    @gingerbred

    Fuentes is truly promising.

    How long will it take you dumb fuckers to realize that being a capable entertainer and being an effective leader are not the same fucking thing?

  19. hotrod31 says:
    @stevennonemaker88

    The saddest and/or most disturbing part of this human tragedy, is that we still have the audacity to label other cultures ‘savages’ … who are the real savages? I have never (yet) met an American Indian or New Zealand Maori who would advocate the murder of millions, over money.

    • Thanks: stevennonemaker88
    • Replies: @anon
  20. Lee says:
    @Zarathustra

    Zar said:

    My father in law was upset by execution of General Bock. I do not know why?

    Perhaps your FIL was thinking of someone else.IDK

    General Bock was injured on 3 May 1945, as his car was strafed by a British fighter plane killing his wife, stepdaughter, and a friend. Initially the only survivor of the attack, Bock died of his injuries the following day.[36] He was buried in a cemetery in Lensahn

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fedor_von_Bock#:~:text=Bock%20was%20injured%20on%203,in%20a%20cemetery%20in%20Lensahn.

  21. Zionists would give him a medal. Their whole point of the holohoax and WW2, was to scare comfortable “Jews” to move from beautiful and green Europe to the barren deserts of Palestine. As Theodor Herzl said, they would use anti-Semitism to further their cause. 70 years later now, the Zionists have failed. Most “Jews” would rather live elsewhere. Most current anti-Semitic crimes are now exposed as having been committed by Zionists. They are slow to learn. Palestine is a barren desert, it should be empty, eventually.

  22. G J T says:
    @gingerbred

    Whatever criticism you could fairly level at him in the past, Anglin is the exact opposite of a degenerate.

    Nick Fuentes, on the other hand, is a feminine, semi-closeted homosexual whose entire “movement” is a cheap imitation of Trumpenstein. He openly associates with jewish supremacists and is probably some sort of FBI informant at this point. He is not a leader in any sense of the word, and if you’re putting your eggs in that basket you’re in for a rude awakening.

    • Agree: Katrinka
  23. Good text, but I would go further. It is absolutely irrelevant whether Streicher was bad or not, or what he published was true or not.

    The point is that no one, including Streicher, should go to jail, let alone murdered, for his thought, publications or anything he said or wrote.

    Such behavior could be, in a normal society, sanctioned financially- and nothing more.

    • Agree: Joe Paluka, Right_On
    • Replies: @Incitatus
  24. @Zarathustra

    General Bock? He was not executed.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fedor_von_Bock
    …………………………………
    Bock was injured on 3 May 1945, as his car was strafed by a British fighter plane killing his wife, stepdaughter, and a friend. Initially the only survivor of the attack, Bock died of his injuries the following day. He was buried in a cemetery in Lensahn.

    • Replies: @Right_On
  25. mcohen [AKA "mco"] says:

    m.weber is a mensch for exposing the scum like streicher

    • Replies: @Badger Down
  26. @Franz

    “After WWII men of that sort were not welcome in American political life.”

    I think it started long before WWII.

    • Replies: @Franz
  27. @gingerbred

    This is a serious question: isn’t Fuentes a homosexual? There was a video I saw of him on a “date” with another homosexual who was wearing those fake cat ears female strippers wear as a costume accessory.

  28. Death penalty for publishing cartoons? And I thought only Muslims are that vindictive:

    https://collections.ushmm.org/iiif-b/assets/727084

    • Agree: Colin Wright
  29. Citing articles that appeared in his paper, the Tribunal sentenced him to death for “Crimes Against Humanity.”

    Sneak preview of the future.

    • Agree: Right_On
  30. Baron says:

    Der Stürmer Circulation: 1927-1938
    Issue/Year Circulation

    1927 14,000
    1933 25,000
    No. 6 (1934) 47,000
    No.13 (1934) 49,000
    No. 17 (1934) 50,000
    No. 19 (1934) 60,000
    No. 33 (1934) 80,000
    No. 35 (1934) 94,114
    No. 42 (1934) 113,800
    No. 6 (1935) 132,897
    No. 19 (1935) 202,600
    No. 29 (1935) 286,400
    No. 36 (1935) 410,600
    No. 40 (1935) 486,000
    No. 5 (1938) 473,000

    The circulation growth after 1934 was assisted by enthusiastic promotion. Robert Ley, the Nazi labor leader, pushed the Stürmer on his membership. Various party affiliates conducted circulation drives. In 1937, for example, a Nazi district farmer’s organization leader wrote his subordinates ordering them to attend to the Stürmer when conducting anti-Jewish agitation. “No education material is better there than the old anti-Semitic fighting paper of the Gauleiter of Franconia, Julius Streicher, the Stürmer. With blunt plainness he reveals the crimes of the Jewish race from the beginning to the present.” (9) All subordinates were to subscribe, and were to inform him that they had done so. No excuses would be accepted.

    If you want more look here:

    https://forum.axishistory.com/viewtopic.php?t=24335&start=30

  31. Baron says:

    The man, Herr Streicher, had the lowest IQ level of the accused at Nuremberg (106), he was a sickening thug, more than a womaniser and a bigoted Jew hater, the world DNA bank benefits from his demise.

  32. Emslander says:
    @Right_On

    You can see, even to this day, in the United States of America the effects of the war crimes perpetrated by our country during WWI and WWII. It’s why the members of our ruling class go around with nervous smiles in public. It’s the curious sneer that appears on the face of our special school President whenever he refers to American traditions or to the preferred leaders chosen by the real voters.

    Our WASP leadership joins with enthusiasm the propagandists that forced us into those European wars against all the natural inclinations of its people. Those leaders fear the consequences that will come when the old world pays us back for the holocaust against the Teutons.

    • Agree: HeebHunter
  33. Anonymous[301] • Disclaimer says:
    @Vaterland

    Incidentally I did think of precisely Der Stürmer recently. If Unz’ motivation is to trigger his co-ethnics, Der Stürmer originals would have made a nice reprint, if they weren’t too low brow.

    Some of Ron Unz’s American Pravda articles make the most extreme Der Stürmer articles (e.g., the May 1934 “ritual murder” issue banned by The Third Reich) look almost tame in comparison. But what makes Ron’s work unassailable is his assiduous research and his referencing of noted works and scholars to substantiate his thesis. He also— in the disputatio method of Scholastic philosophers and theologians— references critics and their strongest arguments against his thesis and explains why their arguments are spurious (e.g., Deborah Lipstadt’s work).

  34. During WWII the US government published racist anti-Japanese cartoons, far more atrocious than Julius Streicher. Should those responsible for them have been condemned to death too?

    Some examples:

    https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSKm_GPi2KdL0LHqA7wQPP5-FsjO57y7c2RNYgV8SBFohFq0jvn4xTi12cihzvrGJQrnHk&usqp=CAU

    https://img.huffingtonpost.com/asset/5a29a92e1e00003b000c2ac0.jpeg?ops=scalefit_630_noupscale

    • Agree: Happy Tapir, Right_On
    • Thanks: Schuetze
  35. @gingerbred

    Fuentes is alt-kike to the core.
    He is a shill. Don’t be fooled.
    Watch how he portrays the current murder in Gaza, ‘We don’t want to be involved’. Sure Nick. Let the Jews murder kids using U.S. paid for bombs. No problem.

    • Disagree: Irish Savant
    • Thanks: Joe Levantine
  36. Anonymous[369] • Disclaimer says:
    @HeebHunter

    HeebHunter is the level of sophistication of hasbara now. 🤦‍♂️ Kind of sad.

    • Agree: Marckus
    • Replies: @Marckus
    , @Mefobills
  37. @gotmituns

    It was the same in England where Jews were not present before the 1066 Norman Conquest.

    They were brought over by William, mainly from Rouen.
    There is some suspicion, maybe true/maybe not, that they financed him in return for preference in posts like tax farmers in England. There is also some belief that philosemitic William had a Jewish mother, though this is not certain.

    https://theirishslaves.blogspot.com/2013/03/jews-financed-william-conquerer.html

    Their rapacity was so extreme that King Edward I “Longshanks” expelled them in 1290 in response to popular cries of grievance.
    There were pogroms abt a century before this in 1189/90.
    The 1290 Edict of Expulsion is still valid law in England.

    As most know Menasseh ben Israel “persuaded” Oliver Cromwell to re-admit Jews to England in 1656, shortly followed the execution of the English King Charles I and the founding of the private Bank of England.
    It is possible to see today’s UK as a Jewish-owned country which has consistently carried out pro-Jewish and especially pro-Zionist policy.
    It has become known as Perfidious Albion, perhaps for that reason.

    This situation is not viewed favourably by some in England.

    http://chuckmaultsby.net/id148.html

    • Replies: @stevennonemaker88
  38. Some of its most sensational articles were actually penned by a Jewish journalist, Fritz Brand, who wrote for Der Stürmer under the name of Jonas Wolk from 1934 to 1938.

    That’s the other way around, apparently: his real name was Jonas Wolk, and he wrote under the name of Fritz Brand. I will quote the exact same source from which you took that information, Randall Bytwerk’s book; I couldn’t find the other reference you gave, but there are others who agree and which you can find through a web search:

    Over three hundred people worked for Streicher by 1939, including, remarkably enough, a Jew named Jonas Wolk, who under the pen name Fritz Brand wrote particularly dreadful Stürmer articles.

  39. Hans says:
    @Wally

    Thanks, Wally. It’s real funny that Mr. Weber doesn’t mention that he’s in charge of the once important IHR (Institute for Historical Review).

    His role in the take down of Willis Carto’s creation is sordid.

    Interesting info on Streicher, but Weber is a disgrace.

    Mike Piper’s lonely battle to expose the Jewish takeover of the IHR – https://carolynyeager.net/mike-pipers-lonely-battle-expose-jewish-takeover-ihr

    • Replies: @anon
  40. Marckus says:
    @GMC

    Hey, its GMC the fake Vietnam vet ! The Phony Hero !

    I thought you said this site was only for authentic people. WHAT are you doing here ?

    You still have not provided me the information I asked so I could check you out.

    This is the third time. If you are a vet then as Heebhunter stated

    the same Zionist game

    sent you to Nam while your fat ugly wife took the BBC back home. lol

    • Replies: @anarchyst
  41. @Spender_CGB

    Agreed.

    Anyone looking for brief detail of William Joyce might look at —

    https://www.stevenbooks.co.uk/publications/martyrdom-of-william-joyce/

    Or read his own book “Twilight over England”

    archive https://archive.org/details/TwilightOverEngland

    now reprinted as facsimile —

    • Agree: Spender_CGB
  42. As I recall, one of the rules going into the the trial, was that Nazis leaders could be tried and punished only for war crimes that Allied leaders themselves had not also committed. Leading of course, to Nazis leaders being executed for imaginary war crimes founded on evidence that has since been proven false.

    The only difference between war criminals and war heroes is which side they happen to be on when the war ends.

  43. anarchyst says:
    @Marckus

    Who the hell are you to demand information from another poster?
    I’ll bet that you are a member of IDF unit 8200 who presently has to dodge occasional rockets…ha ha.
    Crawl back into your IDF unit 8200 cubicle…

    • Agree: HeebHunter
    • Thanks: GMC, stevennonemaker88
    • Replies: @Marckus
  44. Anon[207] • Disclaimer says: • Website

    The unforgivable sins of Mark Weber: https://carolynyeager.net/unforgivable-sins-mark-weber

    • Troll: stevennonemaker88
    • Replies: @Carolyn Yeager
  45. Perhaps some day a Jerrusalem court will hang someone for demanding extermination of the Palestinians.

  46. @Spender_CGB

    “In death as in life, I defy the Jews who caused this last war, and I defy the power of darkness which they represent. I warn the British people against the crushing imperialism of the Soviet Union. May Britain be great once again and in the hour of the greatest danger in the West may the standard be raised from the dust, crowned with the words – “You have conquered nevertheless”. I am proud to die for my ideals and I am sorry for the sons of Britain who have died without knowing why”

    Thankyou for this. It is a POWERFUL quote. It captures my thoughts exactly; the odds are stacked against us, and sometimes it appears hopeless. Nevertheless we can stand tall and die with our boots on, winning glory even in death or defeat. I know it is easier said than done… but NEVER GIVE UP, NEVER SURRENDER must be our motto for the sake of ourselves, our children, and all that is good.

    • Thanks: Spender_CGB, Robjil
  47. A poor essay by Weber, only superficial analysis. He spends most of his time dissing Streicher, rather than examining the conditions that led to Streicher’s actions. Most of the “lurid” Sturmer stories had a basis in fact, especially the “blood libel” charge, which has now been documented to have a solid foundation; see Toaff’s book “Passovers of Blood.”

    And the general depiction of Streicher is slanted to the negative, and highly misleading. Others at Nuremberg were anxious to distance themselves from everyone in the NS regime, not just Streicher. His own testimony was compelling. See Dalton’s new book “Streicher, Rosenberg, and the Jews” for a full and complete discussion of the Nuremberg trial.

    • Agree: Carolyn Yeager
  48. Trinity says:

    Father Coughlin, Henry Ford, Dr. William Pierce, George Lincoln Rockwell, Mark Twain, Ulysses S. Grant, David Duke, etc., scores of others who were far more educated and knowledgeable than the talking heads spewing what they are told on (((television))) have been warning us about Jews forever, but the sheeple didn’t listen.

    I mean surely someone like the gay guys over at CNN and Pawn Vanity and Lush Limbaugh are/were more credible than a General and former POTUS like Ulysses S. Grant. Surely the Jews who run NYT and WAPO are more credible than Dr. William Pierce and George Lincoln Rockwell who rose to the rank of Commander in the U.S. Navy. And clearly all those patriots who suck Jew ass 24/7 like Pawn Vanity and Glenn Beck have done more for America than Henry Ford.

    Lets see, I have a choice between listening to a priest, a legend like Henry Ford who helped put America on the map, a former Commander and flight instructor, George Lincoln Rockwell, very, very knowledgeable men like Dr William Pierce or David Duke or a former General and POTUS like Ulysses S. Grant or guys like the gay guys at CNN vs. Pawn Vanity at FOX news. Man, this is a comedy.

    And then most importantly I have my own two eyes and ears to believe by current events and recent events in present day America and the world when it comes to Jews. Well, I guess the JQ is pretty damn simple to anyone with half a brain.

    • Agree: anarchyst
    • Replies: @Alfred Muscaria
  49. @GMC

    Things haven’t changed, from the point of Streicher’s hanging , that is

    The same jewish banksters are still in power. The same wealthy American gentiles are still their accomplices. But we are even farther down the path which leads over the cliff and into the abyss. In fact I think we already fell off….

    And don’t worry about Marcky Malarkey the pervert. He has an obsession with “BBC” and brings it up on multiple threads, completely off topic. That says more about him than anyone else.

    • Thanks: GMC
  50. @RedpilledAF

    The video looks real and that he knows he was being recorded. I’m more disturbed that he doesn’t believe in dinosaurs, though.

    • LOL: RedpilledAF
  51. @Baron

    The man, Herr Streicher, had the lowest IQ level of the accused at Nuremberg (106), he was a sickening thug, more than a womaniser and a bigoted Jew hater, the world DNA bank benefits from his demise.

    Everything else is a lie but this must be true, fellow white people. Not as clever as you people think you are.

  52. An article informs the Unz commentariat of the complexities of the NATO government’s approach to anti-Semitism, (as well as the sanctimoniousness of the victors in WW2).

    In particular, the US approach to censorship on hatred of Jews is shown to be historically less strict than Hitler’s.

    A fact which marks many of those commenters’ own online meanderings as too psychopathic for anyone in history and only tolerable because of extreme (and beautiful) liberal norms.

    In this way they reach the point of realising that they are too nasty for even Hitler but, at the last rung, contort and twist incredibly, to allow themselves to believe it just means that the Jews were extra bad.

    Commenters, meet mirror. What you hate is you.

    • Replies: @stevennonemaker88
  53. neutral says:
    @Baron

    His IQ is higher than any of the ZOG puppets the jews install these days.

    • Agree: Druid
  54. As I read of the Nuremberg “trial”,
    Childrens’ agony goes on a while;
    Chosen Ones in Manhattan
    Laugh to see Gaza flatten.
    Anti-Sem shall be ever in style.

  55. lol taste the dome nazi-fetish loser scums. lol i’m watching your daughter get fucked by massive engorged blacks on pornhub as i write this.

  56. @Arthur MacBride

    Thanks for this historic perspective. You are correct; the money changer’s quest for power goes back a long, long time. They infiltrate, subvert, and destroy. And the part played by the WASP accomplices is even more shameful.

    • Agree: Alfred Muscaria
    • Replies: @Arthur MacBride
  57. kind of fitting how nazi-fetish ameri-untermenschen / toddlerporn-connoisseurs don’t understand the meaning of a legalistic dominance display. conversely, nazism was based on the intended negation of legal normativity; how fitting that legal norms were also voided in their prosecution.

    how pathetic (and once again, fitting) that the modern nazi-fetish ameri-untermensch waves the lol constitution and “standards” of legal normativity around, in seeking pity over the fate of nazi murderers. obviously and grotesquely, this is a mere projection of the pity you desire for yourselves, as declasse pieces of human shit being flushed into the maw of oblivion.

    look at the face of the jew as you die

  58. @Triteleia Laxa

    An article informs the Unz commentariat of the complexities of the NATO government’s approach to anti-Semitism,

    How do you expect to be taken seriously when you start out with such a distortion? The article was about the FACT that the Nuremburg trials were a lynch party, political murder dressed in the garb of law. Streicher was essentially murdered due to wrongspeak. The parrallels to today are strong.

    only tolerable because of extreme (and beautiful) liberal norms.

    An asinine statement. The liberals are the ones who are promoting de facto censorship in the USA and de jure censorship in Europe. The republicans are just as bad with censorship of anyone who criticizes israel. Hitler was a greater man and leader than any in the west for centuries.

    • Replies: @Triteleia Laxa
  59. @Irish Savant

    Satan will always high tail out of trouble. But Satan is powerless without his goyim. So the axe will fall on the right necks anyway.

    The (((devil))) can’t help himself, like an intestine parasite couldn’t change it’s nature. But to be a human being and willing serve the kikes and the satanists, tsch tsch…

  60. @Spender_CGB

    Finian Cunningham is pleased as punch that it was (in his view) Russia that reduced Berlin to rubble and defeated the evil Nazis for their crime of creating “infernal death camps.” (worth mentioning that the Irish remained “neutral” except when it came to the efforts Ireland took to resist taking in Jewish refugees. https://www.timesofisrael.com/when-ireland-rejected-jewish-orphans-fleeing-nazis/).

    On anti-Wokist blog Information Clearing House Cunningham wrote:

    http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/56524.htm

    The Soviet Union’s allies during World War II, the US and Britain, played a role in defeating Nazi Germany, but that role was secondary in the achievement. Put in another way: essentially, the defeat of the Third Reich would not have happened without the Red Army hammering the eastern front all the way to Hitler’s Berlin bunker

    btw, Cunningham, notice what Gilad Atzmon had to say about Berlin under control of Jews:
    https://www.unz.com/gatzmon/the-yom-kippur-syndrome-revisited/

    In 1920s Berlin, the Jewish elite boasted of its power. Some rich Jews were convinced that Germany and its capital were their playground. At the time, a few German Jews dominated banking and influenced Germany’s politics and media. In addition, the Frankfurt School (as well as other Jewish school of thought) were openly dedicated to the cultural uprooting of Germans, all in the name of, ‘progress,’ ‘psychoanalysis,’ eroticism,’ ’phenomenology and ‘cultural Marxism.’ Then, almost ‘from nowhere,’ a tidal wave of resentment appeared, and the rest is known.

    Thank goodness for those Russians who crushed German resistance to Jewish perversion: under Louis Brandeis’s direction, German Jews packed up their tents and moved the rot from Berlin to USA and to Palestine.

    And to Ireland.

    (by the way, Finian: the Russians had more than a little help from the Jewish contingent of Allies in softening up Berlin: According to US Department of the Interior documents, Erich Mendelsohn, “the Jewish architect,” played a key role in designing and rehearsing the fire-bombing techniques, to kill the maximum number of German citizens, including “infants in cribs,” in Berlin. )

    http://lcweb2.loc.gov/master/pnp/habshaer/ut/ut0500/ut0568/data/ut0568data.pdf
    DUGWAY PROVING GROUND, GERMAN-JAPANESE VILLAGE, GERMAN
    VILLAGE

    The Dugway German Village was the primary American site for testing incendiary bombs prior to large- scale attacks near the end of World War II against civilian targets . . .

    In order to build a facility that was an authentic reproduction, studies were conducted to determine which materials and furnishings available in the U.S. would closely match those in use in Germany. A group of German-American architects affiliated with the “Gropius group at Harvard,” including prominent Jewish architects Eric Mendelsohn and Konrad Wachsmann, were employed to design the facility. . . .
    Quantities reflected an understanding that some
    furnishings would be lost in the fires set by the incendiary tests, and would then be replaced in kind. In the bedroom,the single beds were placed together in pairs, with a crib ■adjacent, reflective of a young family with an infant.”

    Some things never change: Jews are still killing the children of Palestinians and others, using tried-and-true weaponry financed by American taxpayers. And crowing about it on US media: Yesterday, Jon Alterman declared that “everybody wants to see Hamas get a bloody nose.”
    https://www.c-span.org/video/?511675-5/washington-journal-jon-alterman-discusses-israeli-palestinian-conflict

    • Thanks: Druid
    • Replies: @loren
  61. Marckus says:
    @anarchyst

    Re: GMC The Fake Phony and Pretender Veteran

    Here is why. Because it is against the law to claim you are a Vet when you are NOT. Secondly, we need truth on the site not any more liars which is what he is. If he has the balls to claim he is a vet then he should have the balls to provide the information.

    If he had the balls to be in a war zone in Nam and again in Maidan then he should have the balls to step up to the plate and certify his claimed authenticity.

    He wont because he is a hollow man. Obviously, he cannot because he is a fake !

    Here on this site, people rant about Jews and their lies and Blacks with their violence and they way the MSM cover up the lies with more lies.

    We dont need any more of this from our readers. So I am calling him out.Why on earth would anyone want to impress people he does not even know with this nonsense.

    Provide the information including whether his handle GMC are the initials of his name. Otherwise he is not for real.

  62. Marckus says:
    @Anonymous

    The Heeb is a trailer park white nigger. Find the worse black and Heeb is lower than him on the totem pole. Out of every 100 comments one might have some intelligent nugget.

    Mostly its the usual “kikes”, “amerimutts” over and over again with other narrative that is barely understandable. Occasionally the rubbish he spews is amusing but 99% of the time it is sheer claptrap.

    America suffers from poor education and Heeb is the classic victim, born stupid and went to school to graduate as a complete idiot. The perfect tool for the Schlomos.

    Heeb protests too much which is why I agree he must be batting for the other side. If he would tell us where he lives we could wire some shekels to him although I doubt he would use it to improve himself, an impossibility under the best of circumstances.

    He is a Zionist troll and puppet for sure !

  63. Fr. John says:
    @neutral

    “The jew fears nothing more than those that have the courage to mention just how vile the jew truly is”

    And now, with Dr. Elhaik’s conclusive DNA analysis, even the very term ‘Anti-Semite’ is rendered MEANINGLESS, because the ‘juden’… aren’t. Jews/Semites, that is.

    And the question about Streicher is not that he was vulgar… but was he TRUE?

    That, too, is something the Deicides cannot stand.

    They once crucified Truth, because of their hatred.

    And that is all that EVER needs to be said of such a race.

  64. @stevennonemaker88

    Thanks, Steven.

    Yes
    As you say a long time even before 1066 England, an e.g. of virgin territory.

    Right about the accomplices. Completely disgraceful. No possible excuse.

    Worse than the Hyena itself.

  65. @Trinity

    Father Coughlin, Henry Ford, Dr. William Pierce, George Lincoln Rockwell, Mark Twain, Ulysses S. Grant, David Duke, etc., scores of others who were far more educated and knowledgeable than the talking heads spewing what they are told on (((television))) have been warning us about Jews forever, but the sheeple didn’t listen.

    You forgot Martin Luther. His books about Jews are nearly impossible to get a physical copy of. You would think Amazon would be interesting in selling books from the founder of Protestantism but nope.

    • Replies: @loren
  66. Marckus says:
    @HeebHunter

    Heeb, your comment is sheer tripe:

    “Monster scum, blood money, allies scum, demonic kikes, faggot sons, whore daughters blah blah. black and brown tide, God would not use water anymore”

    Hell man, you are really ignorant and uneducated LMAO. Your comment just wanders all over the place. You sound like a druggie needing another fix and shouting and screaming the most unintelligible shit on a street corner.

    You definitely did not graduate first in the class in Tel Aviv.

    • Thanks: Trinity
    • Replies: @HeebHunter
    , @GeneralRipper
  67. Mefobills says:
    @Anonymous

    Mr. Anonymous 369, please explain where Heebhunter is wrong?

    Julius Streicher only ever exposed the kikes, and the amerimutts couldn’t and still can’t stand it.
    God is right in setting in motions the events that lead to the current destruction if muttmerica. Filthy, demonic anti christ shithole.

    With how BLM and antifa are going, soon the amerimutts will enjoy their own kangaroo trial. Afterwards, niggers will bulldoze (((arlington))) and spics will blast (((mount rushmore))) to dust.

    I’m American and I can attest first hand to the truth of his statement. Maybe you are triggered like the Jews were to Julius Streicher.

    Any sort of invading army, or a conquering people group, will wipe out history of the conquered. It is already happening before our eyes, as news and history from the past gets shoved down the memory hole. We even have a way-back-machine that was created to at least stop some of the history erasing that is on-going by our (((elites))).

    Negroes are used as agents of destruction by our friends, and if the “hispanics” are brainwashed to feel they are LaRaza Magnificia, or La Raza Cosmica, then they will have no trouble blasting mount Rushmore.

    You just have trouble believing what is right before your eyes.

    Accusing him of a level of sophistication of Hazbara is sad on your part, especially on an article discussing the tactics of Julius Streicher.

    • Thanks: HeebHunter
    • Replies: @Anonymous
  68. @stevennonemaker88

    One “liberal norm” is free speech. The US government restricts private speech that is derogatory to Jews less than Hitler did. Either that is because the US is more anti-Semitic than Nazi Germany, or because there are liberal norms which protect such speech in the US.

    Streicher was essentially murdered due to wrongspeak. The parrallels to today are strong.

    No, Streicher was executed by the victors at the end of the biggest war in human history. There are no parallels to today.

    Contemporary objectors did so, not because they thought Streicher should be saved, but because taking him out the back and shooting him would be more ordinary given the circumstances.

    I am not going to judge those people either. I cannot even begin to understand what it was like.

    Hitler was a greater man and leader than any in the west for centuries

    And yet even he, looking at your comment history, would be repelled by your deep psychopathy.

    I don’t know your circumstances and traumas, and I assume they are dire, but it must give you pause that, when you talk of Jews, you froth at the mouth so much, that even Hitler would have had you banned.

  69. anarchyst says:
    @Marckus

    …lighten up francis…you appear to be on the verge of a stroke…must be those incoming rockets that have you spooked.
    Why should he have to “certify” to you?? Who the hell are YOU??
    I would suggest that you find a safe place to hide while the rockets are raining down…

    • Agree: stevennonemaker88
  70. Ktulu says:

    The world learned it’s lesson in ’45 for having mercy for Jews: don’t. They will never return the favor.

    • Replies: @Alfred Muscaria
  71. JKnecht says:

    Who’s the “dumb fucker”? If you listen to Fuentes you’d know he has talent, charisma, and BRAINS, sorely lacking in “gent”.

  72. @Marckus

    you are really ignorant

    Coming from you, this makes me feel amused. Do your job, keeps making noises. You know this site isn’t controlled by your kind. The banhammer will be swift when Mr.Unz start to truly understand your tactics.

    • Troll: GeneralRipper
  73. @Marckus

    America suffers from poor education and Heeb is the classic victim, born stupid and went to school to graduate as a complete idiot. The perfect tool for the Schlomos.

    I never said I was a mutt though? You kike brain disease is acting up?

  74. Anonymous[349] • Disclaimer says:
    @Mefobills

    My assumption is that the people who take the most issue with harsh truths are ancient Reaganites who “got theirs”.

    • Replies: @Mefobills
  75. @Ktulu

    The world learned it’s lesson in ’45 for having mercy for Jews: don’t. They will never return the favor.

    I don’t see that lesson as having been learned even after millions of dead Europeans and the destruction of Europe’s heartland. I also see Israel/US attacking Iran as inevitable now. Hopefully the destruction from that will be the final straw.

  76. @Triteleia Laxa

    The US government restricts private speech that is derogatory to Jews less than Hitler did

    This is a false statement. The censoring in the USA may be de facto more than de jure, but the tech companies are funded, aided, and abetted by uncle schmuel. The reason der sturmer was not popular was because it was caricaturized, exaggerated, and unbalanced. Even true and relevant information can become tiresome and negative if it is repeated ad nauseum to the exclusion of everything else. Almost any healthy habit or idea can be taken to the extreme to the point of ridicule. Der sturmer painted the Germans as jew obsessed, nearly autistic simpletons.

    Hitler and the German government were none of those things. They accurately identified the jewish banksters as enemies of Germany, the west, and all that is good. Contrast this to the US government that is owned by zionist bankers.

    And yet even he, looking at your comment history, would be repelled by your deep psychopathy.

    Your making a fool of yourself and going off into fantasy land. I do not blame the jews for everything like some posters. Nevertheless it is FACT that the wealthy globalist bankers are largely Jewish, with groups like the Rothschilds at the top. The second world war and the subsequent holohoax were driven by wealthy jews, despite being carried out mostly by goy peasants. There is no way to refute truth.

    • LOL: Triteleia Laxa
  77. @Triteleia Laxa

    when you talk of Jews, you froth at the mouth so much, that even Hitler would have had you banned

    Well, the camps were built to stop the native population from acting on justified grievances against the (((vermins))).

    • LOL: Triteleia Laxa
  78. Anonymous[162] • Disclaimer says:
    @gingerbred

    Fuentes is truly promising. His ability to summon the truth for hours a night gives me much hope. And he is so young. We have years yet to see him refined.

    Fuentes’ job is to catch people who slip past Tucker Carlson. It’s a regime-sanctioned cordon sanitaire for dissident politics. I assume it is operating under the broader umbrella of Yoram Hazony’s “national conversatism”.

  79. Ben Gurion’s birthday present.

    After the IMT “trial” at Nuremberg, Streicher was one of the 10 ” Major War Criminals” to be executed on 16 October 1946, – the 60 th birthday of Israel’s primary founder and first Prime Minister, David Ben Gurion …

    MG

  80. @Franklin Ryckaert

    Well, they did just now get around to canceling Dr. Seuss for those Jap cartoons. Oddly enough, he always made me recall Jew Suess.

  81. Anon[159] • Disclaimer says:

    Simple… the Jews wanted him dead.

    Laws and Justice don’t matter, when the Jews are in charge.

    • Replies: @republic
  82. The Nuremburg trials! What were they, but the revenge of the Jews. The hanging of Streicher, more than any other defendant, was for effect, not guilt. And, as more and more hate crime laws are enacted, the hangman’s noose gathers strength, as it grows hungry.

    • Replies: @anarchyst
  83. @Marckus

    GMC already provided the information you asked for, not that he should have. So why don’t you comment on his reply in the appropriate thread instead of repeating the same old on new threads?

  84. @GMC

    Since the end of WW2 Germany has existed under American military rule, as disguised as it is. Germany reqlly doesn’t exist. It disappeared in 1945. I think the same can be said of Japan, and S. Korea.

    • Replies: @SolontoCroesus
  85. Torture, abuse, kangaroo court and slow hanging by the heroic USA.

    Here is a profile of the hangman, Sgt John C Woods, another US war hero.

    Nuremberg hangman was a U.S. Navy-diagnosed psychopath who slowly strangled top Nazis

    https://jan27.org/rg-hangman-a-navy-diagnosed-psychopath-who-strangled-top-nazis/

  86. @Marckus

    Beware the virulent “white” American haters who profile themselves as “jew hunters”, live in Communist China and “defend “Nazi’s” with outrageous fervor.

    He’s the FBI Jew at the Klan meeting…lol

    This retard kid is a paid troll, same with the rest of the “we luv China” chorus.

    • Agree: Trinity
    • Replies: @HeebHunter
  87. @mcohen

    But he didn’t. Streicher exposed himself. He shouted to the world that Jews should be removed from Europe. Weber has exposed the American travesty of justice at Nuremburg.

  88. When the US government got the chance to do it, they hanged someone for speech they didn’t like. Mark my words: Julius Streicher will be far from the last to be so treated by the US government.

  89. Peter VE says:

    You’d think Israel wouldn’t let in returnees who resemble a Sturmer cartoon come to life. (one of the thieves of East Jerusalem’s Sheikh Jarrah neighborhood)

  90. Mefobills says:
    @Anonymous

    My assumption is that the people who take the most issue with harsh truths are ancient Reaganites who “got theirs”.

    Your not wrong about Reagan, as he turbo-charged finance capitalism. FC in turn is a Jewish type of economy, where only prices matter, and money comes into being with a debt instrument attached.

    Reagan was a Lolbertarian, where government was removed/demonized as a brake on usury, rents, and unearned income. Under Reaganite/Thatcherite type of economy, Oligarchy is accelerated.

    Heebhunter is not a ancient Reaganite, and you still have not addressed the inherent truth of his comments.

  91. Incitatus says:

    What a heartwarming article on poor, long-neglected ‘bullwhip’ Julius Streicher!

    Never mind he was reviled by NSDAP leadership (especially Göring) and ostracized as odious excrement well before Nüremberg. He was an early pal of Austrian felon Hitler [personally convicted of brutal assault of Otto Ballerstedt (34; electrical engineer, veteran, writer, Bayernbund leader) 14 Sep 1921].

    It’s wonderful the author wonders about due process. Was Julius mistreated? Let’s look at NSDAP precedent.

    Der Führer made sure Ballerstedt [long retired, no threat to the NSDAP] was arrested 30 Jun 1934 and murdered (no trial) in Operation Hummingbird. His body was found 1 Jul ’34 in forest near Gündinger Neuhimmelreich shot in the back of the head.

    Any comments Prof. Weber?

    “In the aftermath of the war of 1914-1918, Germany was a land of privation, violent discord, and despair.”

    What about Northern France and Belgium, flattened by German occupation and bled white for four years? What about Russia, thrown into revolution by Lenin/Ludendorff, raped in Brest-Litovsk?

    Or were Germans the only victims in the war they launched? Please tell us, Professor.

    “Marxist zealots, inspired by the success of Lenin and the Bolsheviks in Russia, tried to seize power. In Munich a short-lived “Bavarian Soviet Republic” headed by Eugen Leviné was established.

    German revolutionaries and civil unrest, inspired by Lenin (ejected into Russia by far-right Ludendorff?). Please explain why Ludendorff injected Lenin into Russia with 40 million gold marks ($100 million) 16 April 1917. Spare no words.

    Civil unrest in Germany? Terrible! Explain why Germany suffered 376 political murders (354 by right-wing assassins, 22 by left-wing assassins) Jan-Jun 1922. Seems the radical right (supported by Freikorps, Reichswehr, monarchists, Organisation Consul, etc.) were far busier murdering people. Comments Prof. Weber?

    Hopefully the author will next concentrate exculpatory efforts on Karl Otto Koch and his bride schöne Ilse, elevating both to saintly respectability. Sure, Otto was tried by the SS and executed by (German) firing squad 5 April 1945. But is that the real story? Perhaps the author can hold a séance to obtain evidence it was gross injustice perpetrated by Jews, Marxists, Bolsheviks, the IMT, Allied torture, etc.

    Viel Glück!

    • Replies: @GeeBee
    , @anon
    , @Colin Wright
  92. Incitatus says:
    @Bardon Kaldian

    “Good text, but I would go further. It is absolutely irrelevant whether Streicher was bad or not, or what he published was true or not.”

    Spoken like a bonafide bomb-throwing anarchist/nihilist/law-of-the-jungle libertarian [like little pansy Randy Paul].

    What planet do you live on? Krypton?

    Would you express the same sentiment if in a theatre some nut calls “fire”, causing a stampede in which you’re trampled?

    “The point is that no one, including Streicher, should go to jail, let alone murdered, for his thought, publications or anything he said or wrote.”

    Really? Why was criticism of the NSDAP (Streicher’s team) punishable by (minimum) 8 months in a KZ from 30 Jan 1933? Is that ‘free speech’?

    Tell us about Weiße Rose, the non-violent Munich student movement. Did 21-year old Sophie Scholl and her 24-year old brother Hans and others deserve to be beheaded for their pacific belief 22 Feb 1943? Give us a hint.

  93. mike99588 says:
    @Franklin Ryckaert

    That “anti-Jap propaganda” cartoon might not be too far off the mark for what really happened to western women after the fall of Singapore in early 1942, with mass rape and beach side executions.

    Never mind Nanking, 1938.

  94. The very fact that the “victors” in WW2 executed journalists like William Joyce, Julius Streicher and locked up poet Ezra Pound in a mental hospital truly shows that the pen is truly mightier than the sword. Why was Hess locked up for all those years, was he proposing a peace treaty which Churchill and his cabinet didn’t want? To this day, anything that challenges the narrative about WW2 is viciously attacked or the person is simply disappeared from the public discourse. Why could anything about WW2 still be classified? All the people involved in WW2 are long dead, all the technology is obsolete. What could possibly justify the keeping of secrets about a war that ended 76 years ago? This question can only be understood if one looks at the two main taboos that are still enforced today. Any questioning of the holocaust or anything that shows the nazis in a good light are suppressed with the full weight of the law in most western countries. Why is this? Could it be that certain documents that are still classified might show that the nazis weren’t as bad as we’ve been told for the past 76 years and that the holocaust as we have been told is false on many levels? Could it be that the whole justification for the founding of the state of israel in 1947 would come apart like a cheap watch if these documents were made public. Also, could it be that questions would be asked why the “German state” is still functioning under a temporary constitution drafted by the Allies in 1946 and that the official government of the reich has never been reinstalled in Berlin?

  95. @GeneralRipper

    Beware the low IQ poser. You. Lol

    It is a nice idea to ponder though. I wish I had enough security clearance to be useful to the Chinese agents. They might give me enough money to settle in Vietnam!

    You bet that mutt military bases in Germany are constantly being sabotaged though 🙂

  96. @Incitatus

    Tell us about Weiße Rose, the non-violent Munich student movement. Did 21-year old Sophie Scholl and her 24-year old brother Hans and others deserve to be beheaded for their pacific belief 22 Feb 1943? Give us a hint.

    Tell us why you defend virulent homosexuals?

    http://linkswende.org/sophie-scholl/

    Better yet, why does the based orthodox church of the red army endorses radical leftist faggots?

    https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.thelocal.de/20120205/40555/%3famp

    The funny thing is any serious geopolitical entity, be it the Third Reich, ussr, China, Japan, etc. has absolutely zero tolerance for subversive faggots. Especially the ussr. Oh, and in how america treated the hippies too.

    But we all know a bolshelvik loving slav(e)ic piece of shit would say anything out of reflexive conditioning.

    • Replies: @lysias
  97. @Incitatus

    Am I dealing with lunatics (as usual)?

    Spinoza said- and he was right: In a free country, everyone speaks his mind, and everyone thinks whatever he wants to think.

    The only limit to free speech & publication is personal slander. Everything else should be absolutely free. No forbidden topics, no forbidden words, nothing like that.

    In a free & civilized society.

  98. anon[308] • Disclaimer says:
    @hotrod31

    who are the real savages?

    I have never (yet) met an American Indian or New Zealand Maori who would advocate the murder of millions, over money.

    was it the Maori of NZ or the Aborigines of Australia that used to feed their second and third born children to their first born?

    • Troll: Mulga Mumblebrain
    • Replies: @Mulga Mumblebrain
    , @Alden
  99. @Jimmy le Blanc

    Le May should have been hanged for genocide in Korea.

    • Replies: @lysias
  100. @Bardon Kaldian

    I disagree. Egregious hatemongering speech must be suppressed. In other words, the entire Western fakestream media hate-machine must be extirpated, and its inmates forced to work for the benefit of humanity, say as ‘upside down men’ in the sewage system.

  101. @the grand wazoo

    . . . Germany really doesn’t exist. It disappeared in 1945. I think the same can be said of Japan, and S. Korea.

    and USA.

    don’t forget about Henry Morgenthau’s feverish actions to ensure Jews could migrate in large numbers to USA, where they immediately took premier slots in US universities, with the aid of Eleanor Roosevelt.

    (many other migrant groups started at the bottom of the totem pole, as scratch laborers. Jews in the era of the wars were different: their wealthy & educated were migrated, rather than poor and unskilled peasant. )

    I believe the zionist leaders who managed this migration allowed the undesirable Jewish peasants to die at the hand of whomever — Eichmann knew. So did the Ritchie Boys who managed to confiscate masses of documents that might have told an inconvenient story. Those documents were later catalogued by a team headed by Jews from Columbia U., then sequestered in U S German archives under control of a Jewish director.

    • Thanks: Druid, the grand wazoo
  102. @anon

    Neither you deranged racist thug.

  103. @Franklin Ryckaert

    “During WWII the US government published racist anti-Japanese cartoons, far more atrocious than Julius Streicher. Should those responsible for them have been condemned to death too?”

    No, because when they were doing this they were working on the side of good, America and apple pie. Julius Streicher was working on the side of evil, Notzies and apple streudel.

    • Replies: @HeebHunter
    , @lysias
  104. @Joe Paluka

    And now the side of good is Chaz, Wakanda and Uncle’s Ben pre-packed food 😂

    How karmic.

  105. @Bardon Kaldian

    Personal slander and incitement to violence.

    • Replies: @Bardon Kaldian
  106. @Mefobills

    You are the one who has educated so many of us to the concepts of (((finance capitalism))) v. industrial capitalism and how the former is the fuel of Jews’ devastating power, the application of which is to serve their forefather the devil.

    Sure looks like Andrew Anglin, the world’s most prescient and cutting edge journalist of the last five years as validated by his being the first cyber figure the Jewx’ Media’s tech wing de-personified which they did after that event that spooked them to the extreme, Charlottesville, has been benefiting from your tutelage:

    https://dailystormer.su/there-is-no-reason-to-attack-elon-over-bitcoin-just-wait-and-see-what-hes-doing/

    [MORE]

    There are millions of people who have suffered under the international banking system, who have been liberated by Bitcoin, and the liberation can only continue. It’s not just first world people – many third worlders have adopted Bitcoin. Furthermore, there are projects like Cardano that are suffering under Elon’s tweets that are directly helping the Africans manage whatever it is they’re trying to manage in Africa.

    Crypto is good for everyone on earth.

    The key reason that the Chinese are able to be the center of Bitcoin mining is that they have a government that encourages growth by rewarding ingenuity with financial freedom.

    If we can learn one single thing from the development of China over the last 30 years, it’s that when you are not hampered down by a brutal banking regime, your economy and technology development rapidly explodes.

    Western financial institutions have a very strong incentive to keep people poor, and when people are poor, you cannot make large technological leaps.
    Right now, America or the West generally going to the Moon (let alone Mars) looks completely impossible. We have junkies roaming the streets, poor third worlders piling in to serve as cheap scab labor, this insane virus regime – the establishment is pushing down the people, and thereby pushing down technological advancement.

    Bitcoin maximalism provides a way out. Elon endorsing Bitcoin was like Bane robbing the stock exchange to free the people from financial oppression.

    Right now, if you compare Elon’s space projects to China’s space projects, there is simply zero equivalence. That is not Elon’s fault, but the fault of the environment he is working in.

    I don’t think and have never thought that the Chinese are better than the West. But it’s painfully obvious that they are doing a lot better than the West. They have long since overcome America as the wealthiest country, and their technological advancements are happening at such a rapid pace that there is literally no chance for any Western company to compete. Decentralizing the Western financial system would create massive opportunities for individuals, and thereby create an environment where technological advancement is inevitable.


    Defending Bitcoin is not just a move against Bill Gates, but also against Elon’s Wall Street enemies. It is a move for the people.
    Again, you can easily defend it by looking at all of the crypto-based projects in the third world that are now suffering because of the crypto crash.

    Arguably, an attack on crypto is a racist attack on blacks and Latinx people who are now reliant on this market as much as it is an attack on China or normal Americans.

    • Replies: @HeebHunter
  107. anarchyst says:
    @the grand wazoo

    “Rules of evidence” were not a part of the Nuremberg trials. Hearsay, innuendos, lies and fabrications were all a part of the facade and were accepted as truth…
    Defendants were routinely tortured and their families were threatened with the same punishments.
    The Nuremberg trials were the beginning sources for the holocaust hoax, which jews used with great success.

  108. lysias says:

    One of the U.S. senators praised by JFK’s book “Profiles in Courage” was Robert Taft, and precisely for his criticism of the Nuremberg Trials. I wonder if JFK inherited this view from his father.

    The book also praises Sen. Edmund Ross for his vote to acquit in the impeachment trial of Andrew Johnson, the racist.

    In both cases, opinions that the woke have to deplore. Can JFK be far from being canceled?

  109. Alden says:
    @anon

    Maori ate their children when the kids were fattened up at about age 3. I don’t know if there was any hierarchy.

    • Replies: @hotrod31
  110. Incitatus says:
    @Bardon Kaldian

    “Am I dealing with lunatics (as usual)?”

    You deal with such often? What a great burden. How sad.

    Is it because you’re an idiot? Innocent question.

    Or maybe it’s something you said? Like endorsing Julius Streicher as a free-speech champion? In a régime than imprisoned any/everyone for the least criticism of Der Führer from 1933? Executed same (many without trial)?

    Are you a moron?

    Give us a hint!

  111. lysias says:
    @Mulga Mumblebrain

    In Korea? I think you must mean in Japan. From 1948 to 1957, thus during the whole length of the Korean War, LeMay commanded the Strategic Air Command. Wouldn’t any bonbers involved in bombing Korea during that war have been detached from SAC (and thus LeMay’s) command?

  112. lysias says:
    @Joe Paluka

    Doctor Seuss was canceled for, among other things, his racist wartime caricatures of Japanese.

  113. Right_On says:
    @Bardon Kaldian

    Bock was injured on 3 May 1945 . . . Bock died of his injuries the following day.
    So General Bock died the same day (4th) as the German surrender at Lüneburg Heath.
    When I Googled ‘3 May 1945’ this also came up: “The German ocean liner Cap Arcona was sunk by British warplanes in the Bay of Lübeck with 5,000 concentration-camp prisoners aboard. Over 400 SS personnel made it to lifeboats and were rescued but only 350 of the prisoners survived.”
    So Bock wasn’t the only one having a bad day.

  114. @Zarathustra

    ‘My father in law was upset by execution of General Bock. I do not know why?’

    ? Bock was killed in a strafing attack in the Spring of 1945.

  115. lysias says:
    @HeebHunter

    I see nothing in your linkswende link claiming that the Scholls were “virulent homosexuals”

    • Replies: @HeebHunter
  116. @Baron

    ‘The man, Herr Streicher, had the lowest IQ level of the accused at Nuremberg (106), he was a sickening thug, more than a womaniser and a bigoted Jew hater, the world DNA bank benefits from his demise.’

    His biography makes it clear that’s unreasonable. Being of no more than average intelligence isn’t a crime, and if he had a monomania about Jews all too many go to the opposite extreme and try to pretend there’s no problem at all.

    More than the man himself, the true outrage is that he was hanged.

    • Agree: Rogue
    • Replies: @Wielgus
  117. Franz says:
    @RedpilledAF

    I think it started long before WWII.

    That’s for sure.

    At the same time, Taft had the ability to inspire other men to agree with him on some (what were then) some tremendously courageous statements — not just in Ohio, and not only republicans.

    After the gallows in Nuremberg, Taft hit the right button when he told the press: “The hanging of the eleven men convicted will be a blot on the American record, which we shall long regret.” And it was enough for his comments at the time for John F. Kennedy to include him among his “profiles in courage” for fighting the jackals. Even though jackals had the upper hand after the war.

    Kennedy’s diary during his 1937 tour of Germany is revealing:

    “Kennedy, who was touring with his friend Lem Billings, wrote in his diary: “I have come to the conclusion that fascism is right for Germany and Italy. What are the evils of fascism compared to communism?” Billings later recalled that Kennedy was “completely consumed by his interest for the Hitler movement” during their trip.”

    The more famous quote came from his diary also, and interestingly it came after the war when he toured in the company of Admiral Forrestal:

    “Anyone who has visited these places can imagine how in a few years, Hitler will emerge from the hate that now surrounds him and come to be regarded as one of the most significant figures ever to have lived.” He adds: “There was something mysterious about the way he lived and died which will outlive him and continue to flourish. He was made of the stuff of legends.”

    These quotes came in The Independent’s article:

    https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/world-history/a-berliner-in-1963-but-did-former-us-president-john-f-kennedy-once-admire-adolf-hitler-8629991.html

    Kennedy was always influenced by men of courage. With Taft on his mind and Forrestal at his side, JFK could say such things. Not one person in American public life can go near any of that now. It’s not like we no longer produce them. But Americans politicians see what happened to Jim Traficant and David Duke and decided to go along with the official story.

    • Agree: profnasty
    • Thanks: RedpilledAF
  118. hotrod31 says:
    @Alden

    … for $?
    The eye always finds what it is looking for …

  119. @Franz

    “The ‘Mister Republican’ of his era, Bob Taft of Ohio also quite brazenly voted against the Civil Rights Act of 1964. . . .”

    I’m afraid you’re mistaken. Senator Robert A. Taft died of cancer in 1953. (Of course, one wonders what Taft would have thought of that legislation. . . .)

    • Replies: @Franz
  120. @Anon

    Where the hell does ‘stevenonemaker88’, a fake “nazi” who lives in Central America with his indian wife and mixed-race kids get off calling you a troll for recommending my excellent and truthful article on Weber and the demise of IHR. It is carefully researched and trustworthy; I stand behind it. Thanks for linking to it, Anon[207].

    • Thanks: GeneralRipper
  121. @Vaterland

    based and red pilled
    >t. Nazifrog

  122. @Baron

    Each social class requires different propaganda. “Low brow” work may be distasteful to you, but how is the work of Streicher different than BET (black entertainment television) or any of the crude content that your co-ethnics produce for low IQ African-Americans to consume? Ultimately the blacks learn to hate whites (your eternal enemy)
    In a higher class environment such as universities, the content may be more “high brow” but the material is the same: hate white people.
    If you would stop being a pompous disingenuous imbecile, you would realize there is no difference between hi brow and low brow anti-jewish propaganda. Just like there is no difference between hi and low brow anti-white propaganda. The end result is the same.
    You, being a Jew, do you hate Stretcher more or less than Kevin MacDonald? Probably the same I would imagine. Governments that wish to remove Jews from power need hi and low brow content. Look at how offended you are by Streicher. You’re offended because you know his material is convincing to the majority of the working class, the majority of the people.

    • Agree: HeebHunter
  123. Though I fully agree that Streicher’s execution was unjustified, it does set a valuable precedent; if and when the Amerikastani Empire disintegrates, I look forward to the trial and execution of every single Amerikastani media warmonger, male and female, “right wing” and “left”.

    The same goes with Modi regime media warmonger vermin like Arnab “OrKnob CowSwamy” Goswami in India. I will gladly volunteer to be the hangman.

    It will be beautiful.

  124. @Marckus

    You shouldn’t counter signal other whites, even if they write poorly or have bad optics. Talking down to brothers is the first sign that someone is a bad actor. I’m assuming you’re referring to @HeebHunter He may be of a different socio economic class than you, so what, stop punching right.

    • Troll: GeneralRipper
    • Replies: @Joe Paluka
  125. Franz says:
    @Orville H. Larson

    I’m afraid you’re mistaken. Senator Robert A. Taft died of cancer in 1953.

    Right! My blunder.

    I’ve been putting an article together on opponents of the New Deal (which was Taft) and confused him with Barry Goldwater (who DID vote against the ’64 Act.)

    I’m sorry for the mistake, but can’t help pointing out we could use a couple guys like Goldwater and Taft now.

    A good article on the second:

    The Republican Road Not Taken

    https://www.independent.org/publications/tir/article.asp?id=37

    • Agree: Orville H. Larson
  126. eah says:

    Using modern parlance, one could say Streicher was the first victim of a ‘hate speech’ prosecution — as David Irving put it years ago re statements questioning the ‘Holocaust’, they ‘pump it up and pump it up’ until it becomes ‘inciting racial hatred’ — and so it was after the war with Streicher’s ludicrous conviction for ‘crimes against humanity’, one of the ex post facto Anklagepunkte the Allies made up so they could hang more Germans.

    Wikipedia (DE)/Julius Streicher/Nach der deutschen Kapitulation

    Mit der Verurteilung sollte ein Zeichen gegen den international bekanntesten Proponenten des Rassenhasses gesetzt werden.

    Wikipedia (EN)/Julius Streicher/Trial and execution

    In essence, prosecutors contended that Streicher’s articles and speeches were so incendiary that he was an accessory to murder, and therefore as culpable as those who actually ordered the mass extermination of Jews. … He, along with Hans Fritzsche, were the first persons to be held accountable for what would later be classified as incitement to genocide.

    The Germans do the same thing today with elderly former camp employees (e.g. accountants, secretaries, usw) — they stipulate that murders happened in the camp during the time of the defendant’s employment, then charge the defendant with Beihilfe zum Mord, even though the defendant had nothing to do with, or even knew anything about, said murders, which are presumed, but not proven, to have occurred — these specific judicial farces are further consequences of an Abkommen that was used to prosecute John Demyanyuk after the Supreme Court in Israel reversed his conviction there, leaving him free to return to the US — later, at the behest of Germans authorities, and at the direction of perfidious Jews and other lackeys working for the US Dept of Justice, he was arrested and deported to Germany, where he died while awaiting his conviction (a foregone conclusion) to be appealed.

    And re ‘incitement to genocide’, one might want to note the anti-white rhetoric of today: ‘white privilege’, ‘institutional racism’, etc etc.

  127. @lysias

    I apologize, because over here CIA’s fist up leftism is always immediately recognized as faggotry.

    How about something from the bug chasing communities themselves?

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hans_Scholl

    If wiki is too basic for you, then just put in any search engine “Hans Scholls LGBT”.

    No country, even the most despicable, should have to suffer from subversive. Only a sick, cursed nation would praise the traitors.

    • Troll: GeneralRipper
    • Replies: @HeebHunter
  128. @Farrakhan.DDuke.AliceWalker.AllAgree

    Problem with Anglin is that he really thinks he can motivate the proles and manipulate their passion as well as (((they))) can, using fundemental Christianity.

    Well, just the last few days he ended up sounding like old and tired HeebHunter here:

    https://dailystormer.su/evangelical-judeo-christians-these-people-are-sick/

    https://dailystormer.su/my-nation-blessed-israel-and-all-i-got-was-a-tranny-grandchild/

    Soon he will revert back to the root cause and the only way forward: to destroy WW2 1945 Foundational Mythology of the liberal West.

    The Holohoax, ebil natzis, muh based Soviets. These are literally the poisonous mold that shaped our modern world. We need to expose these lies with extreme prejudice.

    Anything else is pussyfooting. And we know what kikes do to fencesitters.

    • Troll: GeneralRipper
  129. @Franklin Ryckaert

    Perhaps I would agree with direct incitement to violence.

  130. Wielgus says:
    @Colin Wright

    A biography of Ribbentrop alluded to the former Reich foreign minister’s score of 129 on his IQ test, average or slightly above average among those tested at Nuremberg, and then mentioned Streicher’s score of 106, calling it “subhuman”. Since 106 is average or a little above average, it is clear the author was carried away by hostility to Streicher.

  131. profnasty says:

    On the television, Jews have mercilously insulted White men, on an hourly basis, for the last 60 years.
    In consideration of this, Julius Streicher’s cartoons come as a breath of fresh air.
    Turnabout is fair play.

  132. Schuetze says:

    One must consider the context of the times that Streicher was making these writing his articles and making his memes. In March 1933 Judea had already declared war on Germany and was once again attempting to starve all of Germany, just like they had done after all the Jewish lawyers stripped Germany of her most productive farmlands during Versailles. Jewish owned media all across the planet started defaming Germans with the same old tropes from WWI.

    Of course there was the jew Ilya Ehrenberg, the Man Who Taught Soviets to hate and ‘Kill all Germans because they are Not Human

    ““The Germans are not human beings. From now on, the word ‘German’ is the most horrible curse. From now on, the word ‘German’ strikes us to the quick. We have nothing to discuss. We will not get excited. We will kill. If you have not killed at least one German a day, you have wasted that day… If you cannot kill a German with a bullet, then kill him with your bayonet. If your part of the front is quiet and there is no fighting, then kill a German in the meantime … If you have already killed a German, then kill another one — there is nothing more amusing to us than a heap of German corpses. Don’t count the days, don’t count the kilometers. Count only one thing: the number of Germans you have killed. Kill the Germans! … — Kill the Germans! Kill!””

    Ehrenberg is also the one person most responsible for faking the holocaust, but that is another story.

    Walt Disney was also as guilty of promoting violence through his hateful cartoons and movies. The Making of the Nazi is just one well known example, but Disney also made movies glorifying the bombing of German and Japanese civilians.

    I couldn’t even like “The making of a Nazi” because it is restricted. Here is something similar:

    Even today the US film industry promotes precisely the same kind of violence against Germans that they did during the war. Has anyone ever seen “American Basterd” by the perverted child molester Quentin Tarantino? Of course there are all those hollywood flicks made in conjunction with the US MIC like American Sniper or Zero Dark Thirty.

    • Replies: @Colin Wright
    , @anarchyst
  133. anon[838] • Disclaimer says:
    @Hans

    Thanks for mentioning this

    Dr. Matthew Raphael Johnson is also less than pleased with Weber and notes that the IHR used to produce lots of good material before Weber took over. There is a podcast by Johnson over at Radio Aryan that covers this topic, must have been about a year ago.

  134. GeeBee says:
    @Incitatus

    Or were Germans the only victims in the war they launched?

    Germany was the last of all the major combatant nations to mobilise in 1914. When I studied War Studies and International Affairs at Sandhurst forty years ago it was made very clear to us that in no case ever is such a nation the main agitator for war. You are mindlessly regurgitating ancient propaganda, and indeed your tone is strikingly redolent of JIDF/Hasbara, whom one anticipated would crawl out of the woodwork quickly enough once an article of this nature came to their attention.

    Your rather excitable outpouring of tendentious drivel marks you out immediately to those with experience of your sort, or merely with eyes to see for those lacking such experience. Avaunt and quit my sight!

    • Agree: HeebHunter
    • Replies: @Incitatus
    , @Triteleia Laxa
  135. @RedpilledAF

    I’ve been arguing that Fuentes is just another alt-kike for some time. Clearly a bi or homosexual and probably a Marrano or part Marrano. That is, a heavily compromised degenerate who is controlled and is fed his talking points.
    His latest talking point on Gaza: leave America out.
    . This ignores that America paid for all the armaments Israel drops on Gaza.
    Not very America First is it?

    • Agree: RedpilledAF
  136. Fantastic article and well researched. The myriad studies done by scholars around the world of life during the Hitler era before the war, point to one common conclusion, to wit, the picture painted of pre world war 2 Germany is a total misrepresentation of life as it really was in that nation at that time. The atrocities and abominations occurred mostly during the war period, as seems to be the case of other nations involved in major wars.

  137. @Schuetze

    ‘…Jewish owned media all across the planet started defaming Germans with the same old tropes from WWI…’

    It’d be worthwhile to compare the treatment accorded pre-war Nazi Germany in America versus its reception in Britain, France, and elsewhere.

    I have the (relatively uninformed) impression that Nazism came in for far more uniform and virulent abuse in the United States than it did elsewhere. The attitude in — say — Britain tended to be more ‘this is interesting. That right there is a bit much, but perhaps they’ve got hold of something there.’

    • Replies: @Carolyn Yeager
  138. anon[838] • Disclaimer says:
    @Incitatus

    “Marxist zealots, inspired by the success of Lenin and the Bolsheviks in Russia, tried to seize power. In Munich a short-lived “Bavarian Soviet Republic” headed by Eugen Leviné was established.

    German revolutionaries and civil unrest, inspired by Lenin (ejected into Russia by far-right Ludendorff?)

    (((German))) revolutionaries – at least 11 of the top 15 leaders in the attempted communist revolution in Germany were of course jewish.

    at the same time jewish communists under Bela Kuhn had taken over Hungary as the Hungarian Soviet Republic

    what right do these 2 percenters have to keep stirring up shit in someone else’s country?

    • Replies: @Colin Wright
    , @Incitatus
  139. @Incitatus

    ‘Or were Germans the only victims in the war they launched? Please tell us, Professor.’

    You’re referring to 1914-18. It’s absurd to claim ‘Germany launched’ that war.

    One can make equally reasonable arguments for it having been started by France, Austro-Hungary, Serbia, or Russia. Really, the truth of the matter is that the system of heavily armed and completely independent states possessed by virulent nationalism and jostling against each other in a confined space made the explosion ultimately inevitable.

    It was going to happen — and all the powers I’ve mentioned were pursuing policies that made it likely to happen sooner rather than later.

    • Agree: GeneralRipper
  140. @Thedeadlyjuice

    That’s a good point, some people get so worked up by the crookedness of one tree in the forest, they don’t notice all the straight ones. If something like bad grammar or spelling annoys you, it’s best to let it rest and don’t interrupt the flow. When it comes to your turn to write something, that’s when you can set an example of good spelling and grammar for others who may not know without lecturing or criticizing them. As well as being an information website that offers many different opinions, Unz is an opportunity to see various writing styles and learn how to write better.

  141. @Carolyn Yeager

    Don’t waste your time, Carolyn. Saint Steven of Guatemala tosses bones to imbeciles who hate America and the average white American as much as he does. Steve and his well off Mommy and Daddy could not countenance the moral depravity of white America anymore, so they were forced to leave this accursed land. The history of slavery and racism, the wars of aggression, the proliferation of abortion etc..etc..

    If you believe that’s the reason this sanctimonious cunt and his parents left, I’ve got some beautiful waterfront property to sell you in New Mexico…lol

    Of course this list of moral outrages doesn’t seem to deter Steve from still working for a “US based corporation”. Those are simply “day to day, practical considerations”. Nor do they have any bearing on Mommy and Daddy collecting their sweet pensions/retirement from years of working in the “Great Satan”. I’d imagine most of these “expats” rationalize things the same way.

    These guys are phony fukers from the word go.

    Then there is our angry little Millennial gamer/troll, “HeebHunter”. What a specimen of psychopathology he is. This retard troll spews vitriol towards every American who has ever lived…lol

    He’ll pretend to be German or “European” or whatever you need him to be. But he recently let slip he’s actually living in China. Go figure. This goofy kid supposedly hates the Communists who ravaged Germany during WW2, but has no problem with the Chinese variety who starved multi-millions of their own kind while in the process of “lifting them out of poverty”.

    He also has a lot of trouble explaining how Angela Merkel has been leading the German people since 2005.

    Merkel has been widely described as the de facto leader of the European Union and the most powerful woman in the world. Following the election of Donald Trump, some media have described her as the “new leader of the free world”

    It’s a CIA plot I tell ya!

    Same with Macron, Hollande, Sarkozy, Cameron, Blair, Major etc..etc…etc

    In addition he excoriates “race-mixing”, but of course his two Amigos, Steve and Supply and Demand are proud to call themselves that very thing.

    Contradictions abound! Hope you have your scorecard handy.

    Of course the one thing they can all agree on is that the white Americans still here, deserve every last bit of what they’re getting.

    And they wonder why I label them SJW’s.

  142. @Colin Wright

    I have the (relatively uninformed) impression that Nazism came in for far more uniform and virulent abuse in the United States than it did elsewhere

    I’ll just jump in here with a standing question of mine: What exactly is “Nazism?” Can you give us a precise description, of where it started, by whom and of what it consisted? I don’t think you could call “Nazism” a movement, or a belief system. If you do, please explain how it was such. Was Adolf Hitler a Nazi? Did he ever describe himself as such? If not, then who are the Nazis?

    I’ll give you that there is such a thing as Hitlerism. You may think that Hitlerism is the same thing as Nazism — but how can that be if AH never described himself or his followers as Nazis? Why do the Western nations love to use the word Nazism but not Hitlerism?

    • Replies: @GeeBee
  143. @GeneralRipper

    But he recently let slip he’s actually living in China

    Oh, when is that? Can you put up a quote?

    Keep going around troll taggin’ though, you poor little quadroon.
    Niggers and spics will end muttmerica. Maybe I should cut a deal now for a plantation in Neo-Atzland.

    • Replies: @GeneralRipper
  144. @Marckus

    Looking for that proof that I’m some kind of amerimulatto living in China.
    Still waiting…

    The butthurt slav(e) even called me a “slope”.

    What am I? Probably what you dread the most. That one guy who won’t stop reminding you that you are going to the same hell your granddaddies are burning in.

    “you testify against yourselves that you are descendants of those who murdered the prophets…You snakes, you brood of vipers! How can you escape being sentenced to hell?”

    Matthew 23:31-33

    Remember, eternity is forever!

    General Xtreme-Anal, you can start troll tagging again now.

  145. @GeneralRipper

    He also has a lot of trouble explaining how Angela Merkel has been leading the German people since 2005.

    Something about being occupied by 50000 halfbreed scum, planted with nukes and an actual CIA base in Frankfurt, which nobody disputes.

    https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.dw.com/en/frankfurt-used-as-remote-hacking-base-for-the-cia-wikileaks/a-37841830

    And the fact that in BRD GmbH “democracy”, the parties’ members decide who gets to be chancellor, while the people gets to ponder on the powerless presidental seat.

    https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.dw.com/en/how-does-the-german-general-election-work/a-37805756

    Of course, being an actual quadroon low IQ subhuman, this would be way over your head, or marckuck for that matter. You better wait until tomorrow to start tagging again. You are incapable of having a reply anyway, which is alright. An insect should know it’s place, especially one without a nest to call home.

    And oh

    “Then there is our angry little Millennial gamer/troll”
    You are so obsolete, I can smell the tweedy suit through the screen of my phone. Mentally deficient, demented and broke ass boomer. What a sad sad fate.
    You should try “incel”. It has more shock value.

    • Replies: @GeneralRipper
  146. @HeebHunter

    This is the most hilarious thing you have spewed out of all the obviously envy-based tripes you have written about China.

    All the good, sane people here know that China doesn’t put you away for the Holohoax or having a Stalag copy of Mein Kampf. Heh, they probably bootlegged a few millions copies of 1984.

    Now it very well could be that it’s just you being your retarded self with careless sentence construction. I do not doubt that could very well be the case.

    But to a normal person those two statements indicate that you are a Chinese troll.

    • Replies: @HeebHunter
  147. @HeebHunter

    Oh, so it’s actual Germans involved in this devilish Yankee plot?

    Are you sure they’re really Germans and not shape shifting CIA agents?

    Really, it’s like talking to a child.

    • Replies: @HeebHunter
  148. @GeneralRipper

    THAT is how you concluded I live in China?

    LOL

    I laughed so hard I’m getting stabbed on my sides. They actually hurt for a bit.

    Normal folks would have IMMEDIATELY understood that “here” means UNZ.COM, you low IQ fossil.

    Talk about being a low IQ trailer trash long double quadroon. You are like this loud, petite, impotent insect. Like an annoying cicada.

    I do have to ask, do you, markcuck and (((FB))) have a gay little chat group? All three of you accused me of being a Chinaman at the same time.

    Lol. I wish the Chinese would contact me soon though. I can’t wait for some open season contracts on these filthy, uppity amerimutts.

    • Replies: @GeneralRipper
  149. @HeebHunter

    https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/grammar/sentencestructure

    Here, this may help.

    So we’ll just chalk that up you being a semi-literate retard.

    • Replies: @HeebHunter
    , @HeebHunter
  150. @HeebHunter

    It seems here that General Rectum-Probe is deeply offended by the popular view on LGBT hero hans scholl, warrior of Homosexuality and champion of subversive pacifism.

    Don’t worry, in muttmerica, faggots are kings and queens. They won’t judge you.

    • Replies: @GeneralRipper
  151. @HeebHunter

    Sounds like you’re getting very agitated and angry again, my man.

    You might want to consult your shrink and have her increase your daily dose of Olanzapine.

    • Replies: @HeebHunter
  152. @GeneralRipper

    Hilarious. All over the world people laugh at the idea of a shrink. But (((Freudian))) “science” is of course very popular in the home of the kikes and the land of the damned.

  153. @GeneralRipper

    Muh grammar. You can’t even begin to comprehend how retarded you look right now. There was nothing wrong grammatically, and it was YOU who were looking for anything to spin it into the meaning you wished it to have been.

    It must have been very embarassing. In your little rotting peanut of a “brain”, you almost got that dreaded little Heeby. “Haha I got you slope kraut”.

    Then you woke up and go back into the real world. And your bed is drenched in ammonia.

    Why don’t you sign up for a retirement home. I bet those Latin and Black nurses would treat you the way you deserve. Just like those heroes of the Allies. I bet they are dying to discuss the beauty of modern English with you.

    https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation-now/2017/11/18/veteran-dies-calling-help-gasping/876787001/

  154. @GeneralRipper

    Oh, and I remind you again that you should lecture us on how “German” (((democracy))) works, and how any normal citizen here has ever had a chance to choose a chancellor in a public referendum post 1945. And how amerimutts are not occupying Germany and totally not doing anything nefarious

    Come on. I gave you the links already. Show us how knowledgable you are.

    Stupid mutt.

  155. @HeebHunter

    It’s tough facing up to reality, angry Millennial.

    WW1 and WW2 are long over and this is now.

    Your hatred of us is entirely IMPOTENT. The really sad part is, it’s just you looking in the mirror.

    • Replies: @HeebHunter
  156. @anon

    ‘…(((German))) revolutionaries – at least 11 of the top 15 leaders in the attempted communist revolution in Germany were of course jewish.

    ‘at the same time jewish communists under Bela Kuhn had taken over Hungary as the Hungarian Soviet Republic…

    This is the sort of data people overlook. The Germans — and others — perceived a very strong overlap between Judaism and Communism.

    It goes far to explain much of their behavior. It wasn’t demon Hitler casting a magic spell, or inherent ‘eliminationist antisemitism’ or ‘just being bad because they were Germans.’ It was what they saw.

    Take 9/11. Obviously, we didn’t embark on a genocidal program — but how many Americans perceived a link between the attacks and Islam in general?

    This is the way the human brain works. We generalize — for good or for ill.

  157. @HeebHunter

    Hey idiot.

    This is the most hilarious thing you have spewed out of all the obviously envy-based tripes you have written about America.

    All the good, sane people here know that America doesn’t put you away for the Holohoax or having a Stalag copy of Mein Kampf. Heh, they probably bootlegged a few millions copies of 1984.

    Do yourself a favor and think before you type.

    • Replies: @HeebHunter
  158. Incitatus says:
    @GeeBee

    “Germany was the last of all the major combatant nations to mobilise in 1914. When I studied War Studies and International Affairs at Sandhurst forty years ago it was made very clear to us that in no case ever is such a nation the main agitator for war.”

    Quiz.

    1. Who first declared war, who invaded? Multiple choice (should fit comfortably with your Sandhurst training, et nolite timere):

    A. Austria-Hungary (declares war on Serbia 28 July 1914, bombards Belgrade 29 July 1914);
    B. Germany (pledged ‘blank check’ ally – declares war 1 August 1914 on Russia, invades [not Russia] neutral Luxembourg 2 August, neutral Belgium 4 August).
    C. Victim nations.

    Why would Germany declare war on Russia and invade western neighbors? Any thoughts? Did they teach that at Sandhurst?

    2. Extra Credit [essay – be courageous]:

    Explain chief of the Imperial German General Staff Generalfeldmarschall Alfred Graf von Schlieffen’s 1905 aggressive war plan to mass 90% of Reich forces to invade and defeat France in a flanking attack via Luxembourg and Belgium in six weeks, then turn east to attack Russia (contained until then by ally Austria-Hungary). Was he just blowing smoke?

    Extra, extra credit: Did the Schlieffen Plan, launched 1914, succeed [simple yes or no]?

    “Your rather excitable outpouring of tendentious drivel marks you out immediately to those with experience of your sort, or merely with eyes to see for those lacking such experience. Avaunt and quit my sight!”

    Whatever that means! Good luck in the real world!

  159. Incitatus says:
    @anon

    Debating influence of the “2 percenters” seems the favorite (Jewish) Unz theme.

    Jews are no better or worse, no smarter or dumber than the rest of us (though many might dispute that).

    The fact remains regarding Streicher: Germany suffered 376 political murders (354 by right-wing assassins, 22 by left-wing assassins) Jan-Jun 1922. Lesson? Most murderers were right wing ‘patriots’ invested in making sure Weimar would be snuffed.

    Their wishes came true.

    • Replies: @Observator
  160. @GeneralRipper

    Thanks GeneralRipper, I’m pleased to know Steve Nonemaker’s identity and Guatemalan wife & kids is well-known here. Which is fine, he’s a free man, but what’s with the 88 he sticks onto his name? “88” references HH (Heil Hitler), and the most important component of Hitler’s philosophy was “no race-mixing.” He didn’t even approve of marriage between all different ethnic Europeans. It wasn’t hate or dislike, AH just didn’t want to weaken or alter the German national character. Not that Steve is German but it still doesn’t fit.

    Well, I guess you answered that with your comments on his family’s general hypocrisy on all matters. I wonder if mommy and daddy know he comments on the ‘net with that handle? Maybe not.

  161. Incitatus says:
    @Colin Wright

    “It’s absurd to claim ‘Germany launched’ that [1914-18] war.”

    Really?

    [MORE]

    • 28 Jun 1914 – Yugoslav nationalist Gavrilo Princip assassinates Franz Ferdinand in Sarajevo;
    • 05 Jul 1914 – Germany assures Austria-Hungary of its support (the blank check);
    • 23 Jul 1914 – Austria-Hungary gives Serbia an ultimatum;
    • 25 Jul 1914 – Serbia accepts most of the ultimatum but is rebuffed by Austria-Hungary;
    • 28 Jul 1914 – Austria-Hungary declares war on Serbia;
    • 29 Jul 1914 – Austria-Hungary bombards Belgrade;
    • 30 Jul 1914 – Russia mobilizes to support Serbia;
    • 31 Jul 1914 – Germany demands Russia demobilize;
    • 01 Aug 1914 – Germany declares war on Russia;
    • 02 Aug 1914 – Germany invades neutral Luxembourg and besieges Longwy “the iron gate to Paris;”
    • 03 Aug 1914 – Germany declares war on France; France declares war on Germany;
    • 04 Aug 1914 – Germany invades neutral Belgium; UK declares war on Germany;
    • 16 Aug 1914 – Germany captures Liège;
    • 25 Aug 1914 – Germany sacks Leuvan, burns the famous medieval library, destroys 2,000 civilian dwellings, expels its entire population (10,000);
    • 23 Aug 1914 – German troops reach the French border town of Mauberge;

    Tell us, Colin, who first declared war, who first invaded neighbors? Feel free to consult/dispute the chronology above.

    “One can make equally reasonable arguments for it having been started by France, Austro-Hungary, Serbia, or Russia.”

    If one’s willing to ignore the chronology. It’s called ‘willful blindness’.

    ‘the truth of the matter is that the system of heavily armed and completely independent states possessed by virulent nationalism and jostling against each other in a confined space made the explosion ultimately inevitable.”

    Well, maybe you’re right. All those nutty alliances, European suicide pacts (?). Still, two empires pulled the trigger.

    Austria-Hungary and Germany.

    Guess what? They lost. But not before murdering millions (including their own).

  162. Right_On says:
    @Colin Wright

    independent states possessed by virulent nationalism
    I wouldn’t argue with your general thrust, but consider this . . . The participants in WWI (before the USA got involved) were The British Empire, The French Empire, The Russian Empire, The Empire of Japan, The Austro-Hungarian Empire, The German Empire, The Ottoman Empire, . . . and let’s hear it for Italy.

    That’s a hell of a lot of imperialism. Was Britain really ruled by nationalists in 1914? It wouldn’t have looked kindly on an independent India; or an independent Ireland, for that matter.

    I’m not being a pedant. I want to save the label ‘nationalism’ from being confused with expansionist projects and big-power rivalry.

  163. @Carolyn Yeager

    I marked your previous comment troll because you are pushing your own articles under the anonymous tag, which is trolling. I’ll happily refute you when you come up with something on topic to say to me.

    • LOL: GeneralRipper
    • Replies: @Carolyn Yeager
  164. @GeneralRipper

    What are you even flailing at, you low IQ retard?
    ACHMED the Imam was saying China is going around banning 1984. All I did was laughing at the muslim poser and exposing it.

    Your hatred of us is entirely IMPOTENT. The really sad part is, it’s just you looking in the mirror.

    Is that why you go around stalking my comments and hump them with troll tags like almost everday, you gay cowboy? If you want “male attention”, your trailer park areas should have enough gay bars and meth dens for you to chase bugs.

    • Replies: @GeneralRipper
  165. @GeneralRipper

    WW1 and WW2 are long over and this is now.

    Then tell your jew masters at the UN and your fag rulers at the “white” house to cease declaring Germany and Japan as Enemy States and take your faggot trailer trash, negro and spic convict soldiers home, mmkay?

    Take all those nukes back too.

    Why bother occupying an “impotent” “country” like BRD GmbH?

  166. Miha says:
    @neutral

    “The jew fears nothing more than those that have the courage to mention just how vile the jew truly is.”

    Interesting that the writer of this, so characterized by an apparent absence of any ability to think rationally is actually prepared to advertise their deficiency on unz.com. And I’ll bet they don’t even know what I’m talking about.

    https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2018/06/iq-scores-have-been-falling-for-decades-new-study-finds/

  167. GeeBee says:
    @Carolyn Yeager

    Why do the Western nations love to use the word Nazism but not Hitlerism?

    You have, if I recall aright, discussed this ‘Nazi/sm’ thing here on Unz Review before, when you explained that although there was a limited acceptance of the term within NSDAP (for example the medallion struck to mark the Havara agreement, on one side of which the word ‘NAZI’ appeared), it was originally a slur. It certainly remains such, and is perhaps the most enduring little word in the whole history of propaganda. Modern Western people ‘love’ to use the term because they have been relentlessly trained to do so. It is a facile, simplistic, catch-all term for everything that ‘the free world’ hates and sets its face against, and their use of the term is no more than a Pavlovian reaction, whereby ‘the people’ can be depended upon by their trainers dutifully to hiss and spit at anyone and anything that threatens the core tenets of ‘the free world’ whenever it looms on the horizon.

    As for Herr Hitler, he has become simply ‘Hitler!’ and is the totemic figure of ‘Nazism!’ He is installed forever atop the very pinnacle of human demonology, as an Orwellian ‘Goldstein’ at whom both the proles and the Party Members must – on penalty of being sent down the memory hole – direct their daily ‘two minutes hate’.

    But what are these articles of faith of ‘the free world’ that are so disturbed by ‘Nazism’? Why, they are of course the perpetuation of ‘freedom and democracy’; those two weasel words which, when translated into realpolitik mean the relentless abuse and exploitation of the very ‘people’ who have been so successfully trained to allow their masters to pick their pockets every hour of every day of every year. The core tenets of ‘the free world’ are therefore nothing more than abuse, exploitation and indeed parasitism, both of the ordinary people who have the misfortune to live in this nightmarish ‘free world’ as well as in most places outside of it, wherever ‘freedom and democracy’ (i.e. parasitism) have been imposed, against the will of those unfortunate people.

    This is why the appalling, unnecessary and criminal enterprise we know as World War Two was instigated and prosecuted by ‘the free world’ in the form of ‘the Allies’. They knew – or at least their controlling (((oligarchy))) knew – that ‘Nazism’ and Fascism represented an existential threat to their appalling scam of Neo-Liberal Finance Capitalism, and that unless is was done away with, ‘the people’ would actually have a country of their own, free from these parasites, as did Germany for a brief yet glorious interval of just twelve years.

    The propaganda can never let up. If ‘the people’ ever come to know how they were tricked into fighting for their nemesis and against their salvation there would be carnage, as every bloated banker and every traitorous educationalist and every lying media anchor was strung up from every convenient lamp-post.

    • Thanks: HeebHunter
    • Replies: @Carolyn Yeager
  168. @GeeBee

    When I studied War Studies and International Affairs at Sandhurst forty years ago it was made very clear to us that in no case ever is such a nation the main agitator for war

    Are you referring to a handful of tacked on classes, where you ate sweets and tried not to fall asleep, as some sort of source of expertise?

  169. Thanks for publishing this article. In my researches I’ve read hundreds of National Socialist era German periodicals; their lack of rabid anti-Jewish rants was one of the first things that induced me to question the received narrative. The illustrated weeklies occasionally carried cartoons of fat men with great hooked noses getting up to foolish mischief, but that was about it. And I have seen virtually identical cartoons in 1890s issues of Life magazine, in a series decrying Jewish influence in entertainment in New York.

    In contrast American media were filled with the most grotesque racist caricatures of Japanese after Pearl Harbor. I have library bound volumes of the New York Times from 1942 – 45, and it’s hard to find an issue without such content. The “Yellow Peril” has been a theme in American culture from the first contact with Japan in 1853 (the US threatened war if a very unfavorable trade treaty was not agreed to) through the Japanese Exclusion Act, WWII, Korea, Vietnam, and now in the warmongering anti-China propaganda that saturates the corporate media today.

    Incidentally, Raoul Hilberg, the most respected holocaust historian, interviewed the commandant of Auschwitz while he was in British captivity. When he asked Hoess if his ideas about Jews had been formed by Sturmer, he angrily replied, I am an officer in the SS. I do not read such trash. Hilberg counted the Jewish dead of WWII at 5.1 million, though his methodology is lax, apparently counting the same people two or three times over. Nevertheless he has come under severe criticism from Jewish extremists for refusing to allow then to politicize his work.

    The judicial murders of prominent Germans continued long after the first round of show trials of the leaders, claiming well over 25,000 victims. At Yalta, Stalin boasted of wanting to kill 50,000 German officers, according to Churchill, who said in his memoirs that when he objected, FDR broke in and said, don’t worry, we’ll only kill 49,000. And a good laugh was had by all.

    • Replies: @HeebHunter
    , @anon
  170. @Incitatus

    Remember that the Weimar Constitution was overseen by Germany’s enemies to keep her people under control while they continued to loot her remaining resources. It should surprise no one that this extremism was met with an even greater extremism, nor that, as Shakespeare wrote, the good that men do is oft interred with their bones. Germany’s nationalist socialism was a direct, existential challenge to both western capitalism and communist totalitarianism, and so had to be demonized and annihilated, in the same sort of policy our government continues to carry out today against any nation that dares to defy its would-be global hegemony.

    Today’s party line is that European fascism had been a psychological aberration. But it was a successful economic and social program which enjoyed huge popular support, not a mental problem. Through centuries of conflict and compromise Europeans had worked out ways of dealing with one another that found their renewal in the revival of 19th century authoritarian socialist nationalism. No weight is today given to the inconvenient reality that this was the reaction of almost every European state forced to submit to the American model of extractive pseudo-democracy after the Great War. By 1939, the unwanted systems had been decisively rejected. Even traditionally republican France voted in an authoritarian regime.

    The fascist critique of liberal democracy is hard to refute. They showed there can be no liberty in a culture whose fundamental economic premise is the exploitation of one class by another. Fascist theory argued correctly that the absence of sufficient state controls in a democracy enables the wealthy class to manipulate the economy, the press and elected representatives for its own gain. A widening gulf between poverty and affluence develops, gradually dragging the working class to ruin, because the state is denied the power to restrain these evils. In the American case, the state operates with a mandate from eighteenth century aristocrats that prioritizes property rights over human rights in every instance.

    • Replies: @Incitatus
  171. anarchyst says:
    @Schuetze

    Let’s not forget jew Theodore N. Kaufman’s vile book “Germany Must Perish” which advocated total genocide of the German people, culture, political system, and everything German. Sterilization was also a part of Kaufman’s “plan” for extermination of the German people.
    …and jews wonder why they are so hated…

  172. @Colin Wright

    There I would say that original sin was sin of the anarchist movement which had roots in Zionism.
    Jews wanted to kill all nobility in Europe and take their place.
    ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
    What actually did happen

  173. @stevennonemaker88

    I am not Anon. Categorical statement. You have no such evidence, not a drop, and no reason to think so.

    I’ve noticed you limit yourself to only speaking of Hitler as “against the Bankers,” ignoring that he consistently held that race-mixing was the FIRST SIN from which all others followed. He even repeated it in his Final Testament. But Hitler is only economics for you.

    Your mixed-race lifestyle makes an issue out of your choice to add 88 to your screen name (which appears with every one of your comments). That makes it “on-topic,” fyi.

    Further, the article in question by M. Weber is about the Nuremberg Tribunal and specifically Julius Streicher, which I know something about. Here’s an article by me which I’ll link to under my own name about this topic: https://carolynyeager.net/nuremberg-hangman-was-us-navy-diagnosed-psychopath-who-slowly-strangled-top-nazis-0 So now I’m waiting for your refutation — is it of this article? – https://carolynyeager.net/unforgivable-sins-mark-weber — I’m not sure what you intended to ‘refute.’

    • Replies: @stevennonemaker88
  174. @Observator

    their lack of rabid anti-Jewish rants was one of the first things that induced me to question the received narrative.

    And now we have learned that was the wrong (but morally right) way.
    Online, you absolutely CANNOT give the kikes a single break.

  175. @GeeBee

    Dear GeeBee,
    I don’t dispute anything you say, but it doesn’t address the question I posed, which is the refusal to describe the movement in Germany as “Hitlerism” rather than “Nazism.” It may well be that it’s only a matter of habit for most, but it behooves us to consider the differences between the two names. “Nazi” comes across as something foreign and ugly far more readily than “Hitler,” which is after all the name of a man. Of course, it has been made as terrible as possible, but it still invites one to study the actual person who, in this case, has a great deal of positive writings and deeds associated with him.

    But another reason is that Hitlerism is more accurate: Hitler dominated the National Socialist Movement to the point of being accepted as Leader (Fuehrer) of not only the Party but the Nation. It was his vision of Germany that was accepted by literally everyone eventually. We have Maoism, Stalinism … they are portrayed as great (or at least powerful) leaders in spite of their misdeeds. They have a place in history; they are not seen as aberrations. This is all because Hitler took on the Jews directly, which the two others did not. Yet those why say they see the Jews as the main problem are still afraid to align with Hitler. They’re among the worst to readily align with the word Nazi. They must be called out on it, not helped to rationalize it.

    Nazism cannot even be defined. It is meaningless in itself, which is perfect for the enemies of Hitler/NS Germany. They can make of it anything they want. Not so with Hitlerism. Using the term Hitlerism can give us a fresh, new way of looking at this old situation and actually help us see it anew. Can you see the difference? It’s important that you can; otherwise it needs further explanation.

    I do think we need to do more than just keep repeating the same old complaints and talking points, which no longer move the needle. but have become boring. Yes, there are some who still don’t know, but mostly it’s that among those who care at all, the great majority have already taken a side and just repeat their talking points (which include “Nazi” language). Therefore I recommend that all who are sincere Hitlerites (yes, I’m okay with that word too) stop using “Nazi” altogether, in any form, and replace it with “Hitler” in any form. We should never accept the Nazi-term out of convenience either. That’s the main way their preferred language is forced upon is.

    • Agree: HeebHunter
    • Replies: @GeeBee
  176. GeeBee says:
    @Carolyn Yeager

    Thanks Carolyn. I of course agree with your main point here, but I wanted to draw attention to the propagandised term ‘Nazi’ and the way in which it operates in support of the hegemonic system that defeated Nazism and by extension ‘Hitlerism’. Your point is equally important, if not more so. We must do all we can to promote these vitally important social and political ideas that we know as Hitlerism in order to expose – as he did – the awfulness of the system that set its face against the ideas he was so passionate in upholding: ideas which were infused with uniquely rare qualities, being pure, noble and selfless.

    • Thanks: Carolyn Yeager
  177. @Carolyn Yeager

    I’ve noticed you limit yourself to only speaking of Hitler as “against the Bankers,” ignoring that he consistently held that race-mixing was the FIRST SIN from which all others followed. He even repeated it in his Final Testament. But Hitler is only economics for you.

    In order for me to “ignore” his (alleged) views on race mixing, it would have to be part of the article, or somehow on topic. Otherwise I’m not ignoring it since it is OFF TOPIC to begin with.. I know you are old, so maybe you have me confused with one of hitler’s biographers. I’ve never written at length about the man. I mentioned him twice briefly.

    I said:

    “Hitler and the German government were none of those things. They accurately identified the jewish banksters as enemies of Germany, the west, and all that is good. Contrast this to the US government that is owned by zionist bankers.”

    And

    “Hitler was a greater man and leader than any in the west for centuries.”

    Please find fault with either of these statements. They are both true, and have much more impact than “economics” as you disingenuously claim. Hitler was his own man in most respects and stood up to the (((globalists))), and for that he deserves to be considered great, in a similar way that George Washington, Michael Collins, and other actual leaders were great.

    As to your asinine claim about 88, I am not a nazi. I was born in 1988. Someone as “Scholarly” as yourself should know better than to speak from ignorance.

    • Agree: HeebHunter
  178. @HeebHunter

    I’m afraid I’m going to have to make this the last correspondence with you, my spastic, angry little friend…because you’ve become a total bore.

    Americans do not force Germans or Japanese to keep bases and troops on their soil. Americans do not force Germans to pass laws to imprison their Grandmothers for speaking their mind on WW2. Americans do not force Germans to approve bringing hundreds of thousands of niggers and sandniggers into Europe and pay for them to squat there. Americans do not force Germans to eat at McDonalds or KFC or Taco Bell etc.. or any other shit fast food joint. Americans do not force Germans to listen to shit nigger “rap music” etc…etc…

    All of those things are due in large part to the greed, venality and stupidity of millions of your own people. Bitter pill to swallow for an angry, deluded Millennial, I’m sure…lol

    As far as WW2 goes, millions of Americans wanted no part of it, and a great American hero by the name of Charles Lindbergh was one of many who tried to keep us neutral. Unfortunately it didn’t turn out that way. Men were conscripted to fight and did so. It’s all history now.

    Retard fucks like you and StevieBonetaker and FuktardFumblebrain etc.. demand that I should denounce and be ashamed my own forefathers in addition to my nation.

    That’s not ever going to happen while I still draw breath.

    Period.

    End of story.

    Now be a good boy and go get your yah yah’s out on Ghost Recon: Black Ops, or whatever the fuck you angry little fags play.

    P.S. Rest assured I will continue to “troll tag” your spastic little angry ass.

    😉

    • Replies: @anon
    , @HeebHunter
  179. @stevennonemaker88

    As to your asinine claim about 88, I am not a nazi. I was born in 1988.

    That’s what I thought. Some people just obsess on Hitler and Nazis 24-7-365.

    • Agree: stevennonemaker88
  180. Incitatus says:
    @Observator

    “Remember that the Weimar Constitution was overseen by Germany’s enemies to keep her people under control while they continued to loot her remaining resources.”

    Just as Bismarck oversaw France after the Treaty of Frankfurt (May 10, 1871). Years of punitive occupation until the largest war indemnity in history (5 billion gold francs) was paid. Here’s what the Iron Chancellor said:

    “We will see if we can get 5 billion…France being the richest country in Europe, nothing could keep her quiet but effectually to empty her pockets.”
    – Otto von Bismarck graf von Bismarck-Schönhausen 1871

    Surprise! France paid it years early, went on to host the famous international 1889 exposition (including the Tour Eiffel).

    Germany, after attacking Luxembourg, Belgium and France 1914; after four years of destruction and slaughter, sued for peace as their army revolted against incompetent leadership. “Loot”? LOL! Deadbeat Germany (untouched by the war it launched) never even paid what Bismarck demanded of France in 1871.

    “The fascist critique of liberal democracy is hard to refute. They showed there can be no liberty in a culture whose fundamental economic premise is the exploitation of one class by another.”

    “Liberty”? LOL! Here’s what Clubfoot Joe Göbbels (fascist first class) said:

    “The revolution that we have made is a total revolution. It encompasses every aspect of public life from the bottom up…it has completely altered relationships between the individual and the state…[the goal is to] replace individuality with collective racial consciousness and the individual with the community…[there will] no longer [be] any free realms in which the individual belongs to himself…the time for personal happiness is over”
    – Joseph Göbbels [Helmut Heiber ‘The Early Göbbels Diaries’ London 1962; Childers ‘The Third Reich’ p.331]

    Dictated by a man who miserably failed in private life; dedicated his life to a similar failure, a cult leader, former felon and vagabond. Yes, he’ll tell individuals what to think – those who don’t cooperate will spend 8 months in a KZ (or be executed).

    Is that what you want?

    • Replies: @HeebHunter
  181. anon[182] • Disclaimer says:
    @Observator

    At Yalta, Stalin boasted of wanting to kill 50,000 German officers, according to Churchill, who said in his memoirs that when he objected, FDR broke in and said, don’t worry, we’ll only kill 49,000. And a good laugh was had by all.

    interesting if true

  182. anon[182] • Disclaimer says:
    @GeneralRipper

    Americans do not force Germans or Japanese to keep bases and troops on their soil. Americans do not force Germans to pass laws to imprison their Grandmothers for speaking their mind on WW2. Americans do not force Germans to approve bringing hundreds of thousands of niggers and sandniggers into Europe and pay for them to squat there.

    you dont know this

    you dont know what goes on behind the scenes – could be fake elections, puppets in power

    • LOL: GeneralRipper
  183. @GeneralRipper

    Americans do not force Germans or Japanese to keep bases and troops on their soil. Americans do not force Germans to pass laws to imprison their Grandmothers for speaking their mind on WW2. Americans do not force Germans to approve bringing hundreds of thousands of niggers and sandniggers into Europe and pay for them to squat there. Americans do not force Germans to eat at McDonalds or KFC or Taco Bell etc.. or any other shit fast food joint. Americans do not force Germans to listen to shit nigger “rap music” etc…etc…

    😂😂😂😂

    So what are these, you low IQ subhuman piece of shit?

    The Holohoax endless propaganda.

    The Nürnberg kangaroo court.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States_Army_installations_in_Germany

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/UN_Enemy_State_Clause

    I should denounce and be ashamed my own forefathers in addition to my nation.

    I told you trailer trashes before. You should celebrate mass interracial breeding. Your granddaddies fought for it, mutt. If you don’t want it, you shouldn’t honor the mutts who fought for it. But the way I see it, you obviously would like to be inseminated by black seeds.

    Your granddaddies were kike loving pieces of shit, and you are a negrospic bastard.

    “That’s not ever going to happen while I still draw breath.”
    I wouldn’t wish it upon you. You already have a BBC lodged in your throat.
    Troll tagging me would take away your precious time for a blowjob, so do as you may 💁‍♂️

    I will be beating up some mutts with my boys. It will be slow and painful.

    • LOL: GeneralRipper
  184. @Incitatus

    Everyone already sees what it is like to live in the slav(e)ic cultural sphere. Even your filhty people can’t wait to escape the hell holes called pooland.

    Piss off.

    • Replies: @Incitatus
  185. @stevennonemaker88

    Okay slippery Steve, I would bet a lot of Unz readers think the 88 tacked onto your name stands for HH (Heil Hitler).
    For someone who says categorically he’s “not a nazi,” and doesn’t want to be known as one, you sure allow it to look that way. The only reason I ever noticed you is because you show up in so many Hitler-NS comment threads professing a very positive view of Hitler-NS. Can you honestly say you consider it “asinine” and “speaking from ignorance” for a person to assume that meaning? An intelligent or honest person would come up with some other numbers, if numbers were thought necessary to identify himself from other Steve Nonemakers, rather than his highly suggestive birthdate of ’88. Or why not put the apostrophe in front of it, which would clarify it nicely. It’s not too late to do that.

    You wrote 6 comments to this article, plus registered more “agree/disagree/etc.” than that. All this tells us you’re highly interested in the “nazis,” unless it comes from Carolyn Yeager, lol. I guess it comes down to “traditional” values, including male chauvinism that you think the National Socialists embraced. I’m pretty sure that’s your thing.

    • Replies: @stevennonemaker88
  186. Incitatus says:
    @HeebHunter

    “Everyone already sees what it is like to live in the slav(e)ic cultural sphere. Even your filhty people can’t wait to escape the hell holes called pooland. Piss off.”

    What an intelligent comment! What remarkable wit!

    You failed to address the comment you tagged – German occupation/oversight of French reparations 1871 vs. Allied oversight of German reparations from 1919; German failure to pay reparations they demanded (and received) of France 1871; and non-existent NSDAP concepts of “liberty”.

    Home schooled? Drop out? Don’t worry, there’s always hope. Perhaps you’ll be stuck by lightning and begin to think rationally. Then, of course, you might eschew self-pleasuring and abandon your adolescent screen name.

    One can only hope.

    Good luck ‘HeebHunter’.

    • Replies: @HeebHunter
  187. @Incitatus

    You failed to address the comment you tagged – German occupation/oversight of French reparations 1871 vs. Allied oversight of German reparations from 1919; German failure to pay reparations they demanded (and received) of France 1871; and non-existent NSDAP concepts of “liberty”.

    Bla bla bla. Versailles already took care of that and guess what, French Nationalists and German Nationalists don’t care about those events. They do care about the ongoing extermination of our people by Holohoax propaganda and communist policies, all of which made possible by mostle kikes and slav(e)ic immigrant filth. One of the last group to have a last stand in Berlin were the French. You would say bla bla collaborators. I say heroic bolshelvik slav(e)s killing heroes.

    I wish the russians finished Katyn. But they were incompetent. But Putin shot down that plane though, based.

    Home schooled? Drop out?

    One would know that only a shut in or a paid shill would have so much time to write bullshit, like you do. And what is wrong with home schooling? Be careful, don’t reveal yourself too soon.

    I was in the system, but I have nothing against being outside the system. Are you suggesting that the meager, lowly existence of pooland is already unstable inside this (((system)))? I can’t even imagine the retribution that will fall on you when the world realizes how fake the Holohoax truly is. Tic toc, fucker.

    • Replies: @Incitatus
  188. Schuetze says:

    This one made me think about how right Streicher was about Jews 80 years ago. Jews never change, they are a race of swine.

    [MORE]

    • Agree: HeebHunter
  189. Incitatus says:
    @HeebHunter

    “Bla bla bla”

    Translation: ‘I can’t answer your question, so I’ll blow smoke’.

    “Versailles already took care of that”.

    No, it didn’t. That’s the point. Suffer ADHD? Condolences.

    “They [French Nationalists and German Nationalists] do care about the ongoing extermination of our people by Holohoax propaganda and communist policies, all of which made possible by mostle kikes and slav(e)ic immigrant filth.”

    Wow.! Name individual victims killed in your “extermination” mime. Full names and particulars please.

    “And what is wrong with home schooling?”

    Nothing, so long as Mommy/Daddy are both knowledgeable and talented pedagogues. Were they, HeebHunter?

    Doubt it. Social contact with childhood piers is essential. Seems to escape you. You must have had an uncomfortable childhood. Is it still in play? It that Moma calling you to dinner (basements have many echos).

    Stay well, HeebHunter

    • LOL: HeebHunter
    • Replies: @HeebHunter
  190. @Incitatus

    Only a kike or a goon for the system would be so hostile to homeschooling. You might as well start posting about yiddish skin books, shrunken jew balls and how schindler’s list and come and see are not fiction.

    For a supposed nationalist of a “catholic” nation you are oddly supportive of a homosexual, transversite (((educational system))).

    Subhuman polacke scum. I bet you don’t even live over the Oder but right here to leech on our welfare. Keep counting your days though. Everyone here knows your shit “country” will only exist as long as (((merica))) and the Holohoax can be accepted.

    Stay mad. Pooland will always remain inferior. I don’t see you toilet cleaners cheering for (((Fort Trump))) anymore. Why not ask President Bidet, lol?

    • Replies: @Incitatus
  191. @Carolyn Yeager

    I would bet a lot of Unz readers think the 88 tacked onto your name stands for HH (Heil Hitler).

    No one but yourself has ever mentioned anything to that affect. In fact I have never even heard of 88 being a reference for Hitler and I know much about WW2. You assumed something which was incorrect, and spoke from ignorance. Why is admitting you are wrong so hard for you?

    Can you honestly say you consider it “asinine” and “speaking from ignorance” for a person to assume that meaning?

    Yes. Especially when you use it to conduct personal attacks and pretend it is evidence of hypocrasy.

    You wrote 6 comments to this article, plus registered more “agree/disagree/etc.” than that. All this tells us you’re highly interested in the “nazis,” unless it comes from Carolyn Yeager, lol. I guess it comes down to “traditional” values, including male chauvinism that you think the National Socialists embraced. I’m pretty sure that’s your thing.

    And here you are still speaking from ignorance. I would say I am interested in History in general. The world wars where watershed events, and the fact that so much of what is taught is so distorted makes it interesting. I certainly don’t think the nazis (or ww1 germans) were blameless. However, it is clear that the allies where generally much worse. The primary force behind both word wars where the (((british))). The bankers who instigated ww1 are still in power today, which makes it all the more relevant.

    Reality is highly complicated and nuanced. Making assumptions and trying to (mis)categorize people is a fools errand. And an author like yourself really should do better.

  192. Incitatus says:
    @HeebHunter

    “Only a kike or a goon for the system would be so hostile to homeschooling”.

    I’m neither, sorry. Actually the NSDAP eschewed homeschooling and anything less than total control of educating the next generation (cannon-fodder).

    One has the impression you’ve a very limited talent. Raucous defamation (you hope) masks your inability to actually respond to simple questions. You change the subject with immature innuendo.

    Why is that HeebHunter? Certainly your parents loved you (or did they?).

    Have an adolescent wild pimple problem? Chin, cheeks and nose look like a pizza? Embarrassment/rage?

    Sorry. Have faith, you’ll grow out of it (well, maybe not, but let’s not consider that at the moment).

    PS. Where did you get the idea I have anything to do with Poland? Wait, wait, I’ve answered my own question. Probably when you were popping a pustule death star on your forehead?

    Stay well, HeebHunter (and mind mama’s call to supper – basements can be echo chambers).

    • Replies: @HeebHunter
  193. @Incitatus

    Oh please, you admitted you are a poolish toilet cleaner long ago. And yes, I’m against modern school system, which millions of slav(e)ic welfare leeches get on in Germany. The system that produces homosexuals and pedos, like you and your race.

    NSDAP Germany school system was all about working and finding a job you are good at. And teaching the children the evil of Eastern Bolshelvism and sexual deviancy. And they were right. Even after the war, the victorious slav(e)ic people reverted back to be ass lickers and prostitutes in a literal sense. Poisoning the cities with brothels. Now slav(e)ic whores suck mostly turk dicks.

    Me being against the contemporary system does not prevent me from praising NSDAP system.

    But I don’t expect any high IQ response from something like you. You get what you deserve.

    “Very limited talent”
    Oh, so hurtful 😂😂😂
    I should be more like your (((friends))), especially (((FB))), spamming the site with holohoax bullshit, right? Puh-lease.

    • Replies: @Incitatus
  194. @Wally

    If you acknowledge that the Nuremberg Trials were ‘Show Trials’, then what makes you presume that anybody there was hanged at all?
    I once looked into the background of Julius Streicher (many years ago, when such details were less scrubbed from the internet) and satisfied myself that he was, along with all the other so-called ‘nazis’, another connected jewish propagandist playing the part of a big-time ‘antisemite’ on behalf of the Zionist long-game. So I’m inclined, for that reason, to think that no-one at all was hanged after the Nuremberg Show Trials.
    And what Weber is doing here is similar to what was done by David Irving (who it has been more or less admitted was working a job for MI6 all along) : Pretending to ‘revise’ the story but actually affirming the core (fake) narrative with a fresh layer of truthers’ credibility.

  195. Incitatus says: • Website
    @HeebHunter

    “Oh please, you admitted you are a poolish toilet cleaner long ago.”

    Did I? Guess I missed it. Proof (not holding my breath)?

    “NSDAP Germany school system was all about working and finding a job you are good at.”

    Correction. NSDAP Germany was all about finding a job party flunkies chose for you, jobs that served Mr. Big (and, more important, flattered their careers).

    Consider Aktion Arbeitsscheu (Operation Work-Shy) 21-30 April 1938. It arrests more than 10,000 “black triangle anti-social elements”, detains them in “preventative custody”, 2,000 are sent to forced labor in Buchenwald.

    The most interesting thing? Shiftless Adolf, Göbbels, Himmler (all ‘work shy’ in their ‘careers’) would have been arrested and imprisoned under similar statutes. Go figure!

    You might want to refer to the definition of ‘hypocrite’.

    “Me being against the contemporary system does not prevent me from praising NSDAP system.”

    Indeed, it’s called consistency. In your case, stupid in all respects.

    • Replies: @HeebHunter
  196. @Incitatus

    The most interesting thing? Shiftless Adolf, Göbbels, Himmler (all ‘work shy’ in their ‘careers’) would have been arrested and imprisoned under similar statutes. Go figure!

    Adolf Hitler literally was an impoverished veteran living day to day until he got into what he was good at….

    Your lies are so typical I’m not even feeling anything. Common puke from a polish subhuman. I think I will tell the boys to put more unpaid overtime on you lot. It sure looks like you are procascinating again.

    Standard subhuman slav(e)ic welfare leeches. The current (((system))) is the only place where insects like you can babble. Guess what, muttmerica is going down and we will split your shit cuntry in half again. We are SICK of you. No (((fort trump))) nor President Bidet will save you. All countries surrounding you laugh at you. And with the (((economy))) being exposed for the Hoax it is, the Holohoax too will be exposed. You can hang around our underclass and talk shit though. It is the only place where you even have a tiny chance.

    • Replies: @Incitatus
  197. Incitatus says:
    @HeebHunter

    “Adolf Hitler literally was an impoverished veteran living day to day until he got into what he was good at….”

    Not hardly.

    The Austrian gefreiter was fully employed in active military service after graduating an army propaganda course 12 Sep 1919; he was attached to Hauptmann Karl Mayr’s Reichswehr Intelligence Department (under District Military Commander General Arnold von Möhl) as a spy/infiltrator of local political parties. Thus he found himself a genuinely talented agitator among lesser demagogues. It was kismet!

    All backed by former Generalquartermeister Eric Ludendorff, one of the supreme incompetents responsible for launching and losing WW1. By 1920 Hitler, still on active service and after six years still a gefreiter (Private First Class) attracts large audiences; 24 Feb 1920 he attracts two thousand to the Hofbräuhaus Festsaal in a widely advertised announcement of the new 25 point DAP party platform. After the Kapp-Putsch 13 Mar 1920, Mayr and the Reichswehr fly Hitler to Berlin in a military aircraft piloted by Robert Ritter von Greim to explore potential alliance. It comes to nothing. The time is not yet right.

    Gefreiter Adolf Hitler (20 days shy of 31 years old, no private sector employment experience) is discharged from the army after 2050 days of service 31 Mar 1920. Patrons, many with foreign bank accounts exempt from hyperinflation, fund Hitler. They like what he has to say.

    Fate?

    Hauptmann Karl Mayr (son of a magistrate, WW1 combat veteran of Lorraine and Flanders) is promoted major and released from service 8 Jul 1920. He initially backs Hitler (1921), but joins the SPD 1925 and becomes an NSDAP critic. He flees to France 1933. After the invasion of France, he’s arrested in Paris by the Gestapo, taken to Sachsenhausen KZ. Transferred to Buchenwald KZ 1943 and forced to work on the Gustloff ammunition plant, where on 9 February 1945 (age 62) he is killed.

    Pilot Robert Ritter von Greim, on the other hand is promoted Generalfeldmarschall, succeeds Göring as CIC Luftwaffe 26 Apr 1945 in the ruins of Berlin days before Hitler poisons his new frau and blows his brains out. He opines:

    “It was the blackest day when we could not die at our Führer’s side. We should all kneel down in reverence and prayer before the altar of the Fatherland…the Führerbunker in Berlin.”
    – Generalfeldmarschall Robert Ritter von Greim on leaving Berlin 28 Apr 1945 [Beevor ‘The Fall of Berlin 1945’ p.342]

    Amen, cult-member Greim! And thanks for destroying Germany. Wouldn’t trust this guy with a rural volunteer fire department.

    Captured by American forces 8 May 1945, Greim states “I am the head of the Luftwaffe, but I have no Luftwaffe”. He commits suicide by poison in captivity in Salzburg 24 May 1945.

    Words to live/die by HeebHunter?

    Which path do you choose?

    • LOL: HeebHunter
    • Replies: @HeebHunter
  198. @Incitatus

    Nice fanfic. You should contact spielberg for a movie contract. Then you might graduate from toilet cleaning.

  199. loren says:
    @SolontoCroesus

    My understanding is Ireland is run by a gay indian and has an anchor baby statute…only other land beside USA to have this. also Eire is over run by mussies and blacks from africa or wherever.

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Mark Weber Comments via RSS