The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 Edmund Connelly Archive
Jones vs. KMac: Spirit or Material? Toward a Synthesis
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information


Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

By now, healthy numbers of informed people are generally aware of the work of our editor Kevin MacDonald and traditional Catholic thinker E. Michael Jones. Much of their influence comes from the fact that both have devoted major portions of their careers to writing about what is absolutely the most pressing issue of our age: The Jewish Question.

What has long fascinated me is the fact that both writers have considered Jews and their collective behavior in quite contrasting ways — yet in my estimation, they are both right. How can that be? Thus, for a decade or so, I’ve attempted in my own mind to reconcile KM and EMJ. Better yet, I’d love to attempt a synthesis of the two approaches to understanding Jews. Given that the present essay marks my 100th contribution to The Occidental Observer, I’d say that a conversation about the attempt to reconcile KM and EMJ is worthy of the occasion.

In my estimation, the contrasting foundations of these two men’s analyses mirror the larger Western conflict we’ve all seen for five hundred-plus years with the struggle between our inherited Christian past, with belief in faith, souls, spirits, and—most of all—God, vs. rationalism, humanism, and materialism—in other words, a strongly scientific worldview. Obviously, Catholic traditionalist E. Michael Jones falls into the former group, while Kevin MacDonald, an academic evolutionary psychologist, falls into the latter. When views from these two competing and conflicting worldviews consider a wide range of topics, they barely ever share common ground, but with KM’s and EMJ’s approaches, they share so much that they are almost complementary in some respects. How can this be? What, then, is the nature of Jews? Why are they so unique among humans? What can they teach us about humanity in general — if not the greater meaning of existence itself?

My consideration of these questions is biographical in that I’ve grappled with these competing worldviews for most of my life and have actually wavered between them over the decades. To my own surprise, I’d now say that Jones’ Christian approach is the more conclusive narrative in that Christianity — as with religion in general — posits a beginning, a middle and an end, which even to many of us post-Christians is a familiar story encompassing “In the beginning,” Adam and Eve, the life of Christ, the struggles between Good and Evil, everlasting souls, heaven and hell, angels, and always an omnipotent, all-loving God.

In an exchange among KM, EMJ and their hostess, Jones explained some aspects of this religious view:

Man is a composite being made up of body and soul (if that word sounds tendentious to the sociobiologists, they can substitute “mind” in its place). He has both a brain and a mind. These two entities are related but distinct. Human beings, unlike angels, can’t have minds unless they have brains, which function according to the laws of chemistry, biology, electricity, etc. and are a direct product of our DNA. Our thoughts, however, are a function of our minds, and, although we can affect our minds by manipulating the chemistry of our brains through alcohol and drugs, the logic of our thoughts is independent of the functioning of our brains.

In contrast, MacDonald grounds his trilogy on Jews in a post-Christian world, one is which God is dead and therefore plays no role in the universe, where scientific laws impartially govern eternity, among which are those laws in evidence with respect to Darwinian evolution. Sadly (for me personally) this modern view of scientific materialism allows for no obvious purpose in existence beyond mere survival. And while survival is nice, it’s still does not provide a convincing reason to struggle and survive. In this sense, The West in general has been demoralized for the past few hundred years, depending on the pace and degree of an acceptance of the atheism — implicitly or explicitly — that has appeared alongside the rise of science.

In short, should you warm to either KM or EMJ, it will likely come down to the worldview you tend to accept already — the general Christian one of historical Europe or the modern scientific view. Personally, I can’t imagine many people changing their worldviews from one to the other simply based on a careful reading of Jones vs. KMac, but that has in fact been happening to me. I’m not back to a belief in God yet, but due to the facts surrounding the Jewish Question, I’m inching my way away from the Existential belief that our presence here on this Earth is meaningless, for it appears indisputable that Jewish existence has some sort of meaning, and, if their existence has meaning, so should ours.

Having just argued tentatively in favor of the religious or supernatural, I will allow that KM likely has the advantage in this debate in that the modern West and its institutions have largely abandoned a spiritual, Christian approach and accepted “science,” which can be as seemingly solid as physics and math or as malleable as the social sciences have been across time. As a rule of thumb, “educated” Westerners have shed Christianity and a belief in God, while “the unintelligent, hicks and charlatans” still embrace them. Witness today’s knee-jerk reaction to the Catholic Church’s repression of Galileo or the respective fates of Clarence Darrow and William Jennings Bryan in the 1925 “Scopes Monkey Trial,” such that Darrow is still respected to this day while Bryan is knowingly mocked.

Without question, the largest institutions of The West such as academia and the media, but also the government that rules over us, are functionally anti-Christian and pro-science. Few would argue otherwise. (Let’s leave out the Covid debate for now.) So it is within these structures of support that MacDonald has advanced his career. His project on Jews in the 1990s admits as much in the opening words of the 1994 book that began the trilogy: “The project attempts to develop an understanding of Judaism based on modern social and biological sciences. … The fundamental paradigm derives from evolutionary biology, but there will also be a major role for the theory and data derived from several areas of psychology, including especially the social psychology of group behavior.” (vii)

Though it’s been many years since I read the trilogy, I still have a strong impression that A People That Shall Dwell Alone (1994) and Separation and Its Discontents (1998) hew more closely to what appears to be MacDonald’s mid-to-late career dedication to impartial scientific inquiry. In contrast, by the time of the more famous Culture of Critique: An Evolutionary Analysis of Jewish Involvement in Twentieth-Century Intellectual and Political Movements, (also 1998; hereafter usually CofC) there is the impression that this scientist-author, as a member of the group being “critiqued” and therefore harmed, has experienced a number of “Aha!” moments and realized that his earlier efforts at impartial research were insufficient when encountering a hostile group that undermines the very power of impartial science in the service of, well, a “group evolutionary strategy.” This does not imply that MacDonald did not think that the theory and data in CofC would not hold up to the same standards of scientific rigor as the other books in the trilogy. However, from 1998 onward, I would say, MacDonald has become a partisan—and for many good reasons. (In fact, here he writes as much: “As a result of reading about various Jewish intellectual and political movements, I came to see Jews as advocating policies that are opposed to the interests of European peoples. It was this cognitive awareness based on a great deal of reading and thinking that led me to my current beliefs.”)

Careful readers of the trilogy will spot this shift, I believe, with the first two books relying more heavily on evolutionary theory straining to be as evidence-based as possible, whereas CofC moves on to “the Boasian school of anthropology, psychoanalysis, leftist political ideology and behavior, the Frankfurt School of Social Research, and the New York intellectuals.” What is critical, KM points out, is that these venues and ideologies were promoted for their “scientific rigor” for decades, when in fact, as MacDonald discovered, they were perversions of real science employed in the course of anti-White ethnic warfare, with Freudian psychoanalysis being a prime case in point.

Perhaps more than any other thinker in the English-speaking world, MacDonald has exposed this form of ethnic warfare and really captured the critical conversations about race, Jews and Whites in the first two decades of the 21st century, despite robust efforts by Jewish-led interests to stifle this knowledge.

To be sure, KMac’s account could be right — and probably is. Over the millennia, Jews have evolved adaptive behavior that ensures their survival and puts them on top. But honestly, it’s really just too … “uncanny,” which is why EMJ’s Christian approach has, against my desire, it seems, pulled me toward belief in a spiritual battle rather than a merely biological and social one. Let’s consider Jones’ account.

I first ran across the writings of Dr. Jones through his journal Culture Wars, and I actually stopped buying it after a number of issues because the editing and format were often so atrocious that I could not take it seriously. I returned to it, however, because Jones’ writing on Jews was so blasphemous — meaning so good, touching always on our current culture in ways that were highly instructive. Only Kevin MacDonald, many of us TOQ/TOO writers and a tiny handful of others were doing something similar. And Lord knows the mainstream press and academia wouldn’t touch an approach like Jones’ (though any number of Jewish academics were in fact writing similar things in books that were rather obscure, in part because far fewer people read books this century).

I’m pretty good about keeping up with these topics and am happy to say that both MacDonald and Jones, despite opposition, have been getting great exposure for some twenty years. No doubt this is due in part to their successful use of non-written forms of discourse, such as YouTube, other podcasts, speeches, interviews, etc. And for some years, all their works were available on Amazon but of course those days are long gone as the regime methodically cracks down on White activists (and Jones).

Punishing Heretics

Not surprisingly, both of these modern heretics have paid a steep price for fearlessly addressing the JQ. For instance, beginning in 2006, this attack began against MacDonald:

The Southern Poverty Law Center has initiated a campaign against me. The controversy started in September, 2006 when someone not connected with CSULB emailed all the full-time people in the Psychology Department — except me — alerting them to a comment about me at the SPLC website. Heidi Beirich of the SPLC came to Long Beach from November 12–15, 2006 to interview faculty and administrators about me. During the 2006–2007 and 2007–2008 academic years there was also a great deal of discussion and debate about my work and associations on faculty email lists. Eventually several departments issued statements dissociating themselves from my work and, in some cases, condemning my work.

The result was a hostile working environment for the next eight years (until he retired) where “[c]old shoulders, forced smiles and hostile stares became a reality. Going into my office to teach my classes and attend committee meetings became an ordeal.” Fortunately, MacDonald mounted a robust defense, arguing that “The SPLC is paying me attention because it wants to suppress my academic work.” Further, he argued that the two authors of the SPLC created a report that was “a compendium of ethical lapses.” Unlike others, he survived this attack on his career.

It’s been far from smooth sailing since, however. The ADL currently has 88 entries on MacDonald, and one way or another, MacDonald’s family and neighbors have heard nefarious stories about the retired professor, leading to discomfort and ostracism that most people never experience. And, of course, The Occidental Quarterly (an academic journal) and the online Occidental Observer, both of which MacDonald edits, have been de-platformed by PayPal and credit card processors.

E. Michael Jones has also endured his fair share of opprobrium as well, beginning with the almost surreal story of his first teaching appointment:

In the fall of 1980, E. Michael Jones was an assistant professor of American Literature at St. Mary’s College. After receiving his Ph.D. from Temple University in 1979, Jones had moved his wife and two children to South Bend, Indiana to begin what he thought was going to be a career in academic life. But God had other plans. One year into the six years of his tenure track position, Jones got fired because of his position on abortion. Getting fired for being against abortion at what called itself a Catholic college was something his professors at Temple found difficult to understand. Taking his cue from their incomprehension, Jones decided to abandon academe and start a magazine instead. Initially known as Fidelity and now as Culture Wars, that magazine set out to explore the disarray in the Catholic Church that led to his firing.

What Jones eventually found was that America’s kulturkampf, which long had a Protestant-Catholic dimension as well as a glaring racial one, found itself with a rapidly growing Catholic-Jewish battle as well. Increasingly after the year 2000, Jones wrote about this conflict in Culture Wars, culminating in collecting these essays into a truly magisterial book in 2008 titled The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit and Its Impact on World History (JRS). No reader of Jones’ writing in that tome can be surprised that Jones has been met with Jewish opposition. Jones, of course, seems entirely right about his arguments and observations, but many Jews don’t necessarily want the world to read such truths about them.

In particular, the SPLC has been aggressive in chasing Dr. Jones. And in 2008 they realized what initially appeared to be one of their greatest successes. As Jones relates:

I was in the middle of a tune when I got the call. On Monday nights I play Irish music at a pub in South Bend. On Monday, February 11, I was planning an early departure on Tuesday morning to speak at the Catholic University School of Architecture, as part of a lecture series on Building Catholic Communities….

Tim Ehlen was now on the phone explaining that the entire lecture series was cancelled by the Dean of the School of Architecture and Planning at Catholic University of America in Washington, D.C. The Architecture department was the host for this lecture series. I was scheduled to speak in less than 48 hours. … Just as Dr. Carlson was beginning his presentation, an email was sent from the Southern Poverty Law Center to Ehlen …

“These are not the Latin Mass traditionalists,” Mr. Potok continued, referring to me and John Sharpe of IHS press. “These are the people who reject Vatican II reforms. They are out of [actor Mel Gibson’s father] Hutton Gibson’s world, in saying that the Jews are destroying the world.”

When confronted with the usual SPLC shtick, Dean Ott panicked and canceled the entire lecture series. Six months of effort on the part of Ehlen to put this series together were all over. I would be less than candid if I were to say that cancellations come as a surprise to me. The SPLC, the group which pressured CUA to cancel, employs people whose job it is to find out when I speak and get me canceled.

Another cancellation came some years later when Jones had bags packed for an appearance at a Traditionalist Catholic conference in Gardone, in northern Italy. As before, a telephone call relayed the information that yet another Jones speech would be canceled, “thus aborting an opportunity to discuss the thesis of The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit in the Traditionalist circles who had gone out of their way to avoid the issue.”

Of course, Jones understood all along what was happening because of his writing and speaking on Jews: “There were certain opinions which were left better unsaid.” Sage advice, no doubt, but based on literally thousands of instances, when that choice arises, Jones is sure to utter them anyway, which is why I titled a 2018 TOO essay on Jones: “Too Reflexively Ornery”: E. Michael Jones and Culture Wars. In fact, a decade ago I labeled Jones as a “Catholic iconoclast” and noted how Culture Wars had run cover stories such as “Judaizing: Then and Now,” “Shylock Comes to Notre Dame,” and “Too Many Yarmulkes: Abortion and the Ethnic Double Standard.” This Philadelphia boy knows how to shock.


Next, we come to the issue of how the works of MacDonald and Jones have been accepted, beginning appropriately in academia, since both men earned Ph.D.s and taught at universities. While there have been extensive scholarly reviews of MacDonald’s books, neither MacDonald nor I are aware of any instance of these highly relevant books being used in any classroom in American universities, which speaks volumes about the intellectual poverty of today’s humanities and social sciences, as well as the censorship applied to much dissident thought. (MacDonald keeps a superb website cataloging these reviews and so much more; one can follow the links for weeks on end.)

The same can be said for Jones’ books on Jews, particularly The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit. In my own field of American cultural history, Jones’ work far exceeds in explanatory power what has been happening in America for a century and a half over the depressing pablum that now dominates the humanities everywhere. Yet we know of no instance of The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit being used in the classroom.

Fear not, however, for both MacDonald and Jones are quite adept at using the Internet to propagate their knowledge and arguments, which is likely why MacDonald emerged as the de facto intellectual leader of the Dissident or Alt-Right and Jones has become increasingly popular among younger White males. I invite readers to consider writing (or creating videos) about the Internet presence of both men.

Fate of Their Books

Some of Jones’ books are still available on Amazon, such as Degenerate Moderns, Libido Dominandi and The Slaughter of the Cities, though not JRS (old or new edition) or Logos Rising. (Oddly, Barren Metal, which appeared between JRS and Logos Rising, is available.)

In MacDonald’s case, the first book in the Jewish trilogy, A People That Shall Dwell Alone, is available at Amazon, as well as an earlier book, but not the second book in the trilogy, Separation and Its Discontents. Of course, CofC and Cultural Insurrections, the two most important books in his oeuvre, are unavailable. In contrast, Barnes and Noble sells both A People That Shall Dwell Alone and Separation and Its Discontents, and most importantly CofC (but not Cultural Insurrections). We find another split in sales where Amazon does sell Individualism and the Western Liberal Tradition: Evolutionary Origins, History, and Prospects for the Future (2019) (which, as you might expect, takes a social science perspective on the history of the Catholic Church and its influence), but Barnes and Noble does not. Go figure. In any case, searching for each book on both sites can take some extra steps, so, again, just buy them via links on KMAC’s site.

God and Spirit

As indicated above, I’ve found myself involuntarily drifting toward a suspicion that it’s actually Jones and his belief in traditional Catholicism who is setting us further along the track than Kevin MacDonald. I say this with full knowledge of the fact that Jones resolutely disavows a belief in race, the importance of DNA and related matters. Of course, Jones is dead wrong about this, but weighed against the mass of superb scholarship Jones has done over thirty years, I intellectually ding him only about 3% for his odd claims dismissing race. Perhaps this intellectual chasm between the two men is all the more reason to achieve a synthesis of MacDonald and Jones.

Another relevant point is that over the last two decades I’ve found myself accepting a belief in the existence of Satan and Evil, and undeniably, from the perspectives of Whites and other non-Jews, Jews are inextricably associated with Satan, though I’ll leave it to others to argue whether they are, in some sense, actually Satan or more along the lines of being under the spell of that malicious being.

MacDonald can never go that route because science rejects believe in God, spiritualism, the supernatural realm, etc. For his part, Jones accepts the linkage of Jews and Satan but does this properly through the most basic of Christian doctrines—one of the Gospels. St. John writes in the Book of the Revelation (2.9, 3.9) that “those who call themselves Jews” are really liars and members of the “synagogue of Satan” (JRS, 15).

On page 32 Jones again quotes St. John by writing “The Devil is your father, and you prefer to do what your father wants. He was a murderer from the start and was never grounded in the truth; there is no truth in him at all.” I will not begin to try to unpack all of that here, but in the Introduction to JRS and here in Chapter One, titled “The Synagogue of Satan,” Jones makes a case that St. John was revealing that at the foot of the cross, when many Jews rejected Christ as the Messiah, a transformation in the term “Jew” was introduced, and no longer has “a clear racial meaning.” Further, “When the Jews rejected Christ, they rejected Logos, and when they rejected Logos … they became revolutionaries” (p. 15). The following thousand-plus pages is a story of their revolutionary actions, which can be seen as “the history of the Jews and the attacks on the Universal Christian Church by heretics linked to Jews or heavily influenced by Jews” (p. 20). On that count, Jones succeeds hands down in making his case.

(It is interesting to note that on the following page Jones approvingly cites Kevin MacDonald’s observation that movements are led by the few — which Jones indeed shows in his discussion of The Enlightenment, the birth of modern England, the Russian Revolution, the Civil Rights movement and the rise of the American Empire. That neither Jones’s insights nor those of MacDonald are recognized at all in education in the entire Anglo-sphere is, then, an unspeakable crime and we can thank both scholars for doing their best to right this wrong.)

I know I have given far more attention to the writing of Jones than to MacDonald, but that is because I am de facto in MacDonald’s camp, writing as I do for The Occidental Quarterly and The Occidental Observer, where I explicitly support MacDonald’s work and implicitly follow it at all times as well. With Jones, however, it takes a bit more effort. MacDonald writes with unbroken clarity in a social science style, so his own prose speaks for itself. In contrast, Jones is more of a storyteller whose constant goal is to reveal “the unwritten grammar” of events both old and new. The only other scholar I’ve seen succeed in this so successfully in the cultural sphere is the late Jewish professor Stephen Whitfield (American Space, Jewish Time, 1988), though Whitfield covers only a fraction of the story Jones does. The style is fun but can take a little getting used to.

Jones uses other metaphors for exposing “the unwritten grammar” of reality. For instance, in Chapter 71 of Barren Metal, “Andrew Jackson and the Monster Bank,” Jones argues that “Jackson’s repeated use of the word ‘monster’ is the key which unlocks the door to understanding.” This passage highlights both the beauty and the utility of Jones’ writing, in this instance in a critique of usury:

What [author] Meyer failed to mention is that usury is, as Ezra Pound would have put it, contra naturam, and, by its very nature monstrous. Far from being a mysterious lapse into incoherence, Jackson’s repeated use of the word ‘monster’ is the key which unlocks the door to understanding his stake in this fight. A monster is something unnatural. Usury is monstrous because it is contra naturam. The bank war of the 1830s arose because neither Andrew Jackson nor his opponent Nicholas Biddle could articulate the real issue which had plagued the American System from its inception in the mind of Alexander Hamilton, namely, usury.

I suspect our editor Kevin MacDonald will not be overly persuaded by my foray into religion, but these unhappy, desperate times push me to desperate thoughts. By all rational, material measurements, the White race has been defeated by Jewry. Point to even one area in which Whites hold a credible counter to Jewish power. There are none. Except — and this is where desperation comes in — a turn to the possible existence of God, and the Christian God at that. Remember, if I can be convinced that Satan is alive and well, I can well consider that Satan’s opponent, God, also exists. It’s a start.

And I’m not the only one thinking this way. Much to my utter surprise, none other than enfant terrible Andrew Anglin has headed in much the same direction, to the extent that he, too, is turning to E. Michael Jones. In a blog on September 24, 2021, he posted this lecture by Jones:

Video Link

Commenting on this video, Anglin wrote:

When I read about the way homosexuals have infiltrated the Catholic Church, my resolve in the belief that there is only one true faith is strengthened, as it makes perfect sense to me that in this time of ultimate, total, global satanic Jewish evil, that the Catholic Church would be under such aggressive assault by the Devil….

I will admit, however, that a big part of this is the fact that I really believe that E. Michael Jones is the only relevant living Christian intellectual. However, if that is the case, then why? Surely, God will offer us a guide in this time of darkness? I’m only seeing one guide, who actually seems like an adult.

I am personally cursed to see clearly what is happening in the material world. But I am not any clearer than you on what is happening in the spiritual world. So I am left in as much of a conundrum in trying to figure out what the true nature of religion is as anyone else.

Like Jones, Anglin believes that the Catholic Church “is a top target of Satan.” And any regular reader of The Daily Stormer knows that Anglin sees Jews at the center of all of this. Anglin and Jones are strange bedfellows indeed, but if Jesus could forgive a former prostitute and welcome her among his most intimate followers, Jones and the rest of us might also accept Anglin in a similar way.

Isn’t there an inescapable feeling that we are at a crossroads of history? MacDonald emphasizes that if Whites cannot adopt a counter strategy to the current Jewish group evolutionary one, our prospects are doubtful. Anglin, too, has admitted that The West has lost to the Jews and now is the time merely to survive. Jones, however, offers hope. In the closing of JRS, he writes:

The final collapse of Jewish resistance to Logos will take place when they have reached the pinnacle of worldly power. At no time in the past 2000 years have Jews had more power than now. …

The conversion of the Jews did not seem imminent. The Jews had never been more powerful; the Church, the antagonist of the synagogue of Satan for 2000 years, had never been weaker. But appearances can deceive. Benedict XVI, the author of Dominus Iesus, had said, even before becoming pope, that he looked forward to the conversion of the Jews. Reversal was in the air. (1073–77)

Perhaps we can only pray that this is so.


As stated above, both MacDonald and Jones, based particularly on their books CofC and JRS, appear to be right with respect to the JQ. One cannot, for instance, read the writings of MacDonald and conclude, “No, he is wrong.” On scientific terms, he has nailed it. With Jones’ writing on Jews, it is not as easy to declare outright that “This is true” because it revolves around religion, and belief is a chief characteristic of religion. It is simply not susceptible to scientific proof. Still, when a reader gets to the end of JRS, the overwhelming response has to be, “Dr. Jones has made his case about the revolutionary (and destructive) nature of Jews.”

This is such an important point to grasp. Take, for instance, last year’s George Floyd incident, BLM violence, and what has since flowed from them. Back in the ‘60s and ‘70s it was pretty much common knowledge that Jews were using Blacks as a battering ram against White society, yet by my estimation, about 90% of the writing on Blacks and American society since last year either states or implies that it is Black agency and power themselves that are responsible for this. Of course, that is preposterous. Blacks don’t have any power. Jews are responsible, and KM and EMJ have written brilliantly on this in an historical context. KM did so in his essay “Jews, Blacks, and Race,” which appeared in Cultural Insurrections, while Jones did so extensively in JRS (specifically chapters 14, 16, 17, 19, 20, 22, 26 and 29). This should be common knowledge still but is not.

Again, I must stress how critical it is to openly talk about Jews and the JQ, precisely as KM and EMJ have done. As Jones wrote in Culture Wars in the December 2020 issue, Chinese philosopher Sun Tzu told us, “If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles. If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat. If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle.” That is why Jones ceaselessly names the enemy: “If you want to succeed in the culture wars, you must identify the enemy.”

Elsewhere (Part 1 & Part 2; also here) I’ve cited TOO writer Andrew Joyce on both naming the Jew and describing their destructive (and often revolutionary) behavior. Just recently he contributed a new TOO essay in which he reviewed a new Arktos book by New Zealander Kerry Bolton, a book which gets to the heart of both MacDonald’s and Jones’s cases. Not mincing words, Joyce writes that “a very Jewish cast of characters were responsible for developing, spreading, and implementing many of the most destructive ideas of the twentieth and twenty-first centuries. At the heart of these ideas is the desire to fracture the host society/mass culture.” Joyce quotes Bolton for a specific argument:

The focus of this Neo-Freudianism is on the individual detached from society. It is therefore a means of deconstructing and fracturing the social organism, which is why the Marxian theorists who created the Frankfurt Institute in 1923 found Freudianism to be such a useful ingredient in creating a new revolutionary synthesis. The organic bonds of family, state, faith, and ethos, disparaged as ‘primary ties’ in need of cutting, were portrayed as injurious to the individual well-being and as repressing the individual’s path to self-actualisation.

Bolton, Joyce notes, shows that “The primary weapon employed by all factions is the Freudo-Marxism Synthesis, which touted social engineering as a ‘therapy’ but possessed social control as its aim. This synthesis and its early promotion were of course Jewish in origin, and Bolton makes sure to hammer this point home.” Fortunately for us, Bolton is as tenacious as Joyce and “repeatedly stresses that many of these figures are Jews, and that the Frankfurt School, its funders, and many other peripheral associations involved in early Cultural Marxism were ‘largely Jewish.’” This corresponds completely with the scope of the writing of MacDonald and Jones, both of whom are referenced in Joyce’s essay. I’m completely astonished at this late date that so many otherwise intelligent people either fail to see this or opt not to mention it.

In any case, for years, a tiny minority of us Whites have labored mightily to inform fellow Whites (and fellow Christians) of the threats posed by our enemy. We have done what we can but it appears not to suffice. Perhaps, then, E. Michael Jones has it right in the video above when he says to change the question from “What can we do?” to “What can God do?” Maybe so. In our desperate hour, maybe that’s all we can do. I’m running out of other ideas.

(Republished from The Occidental Observer by permission of author or representative)
Hide 149 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. Yet no appeals to The Tooth Fairy. I understand not this offense. Also, Peter Rabbit and Sinterklaas lie untapped.

    The problem is failure to stand individually. The average white’s ‘stand’ must blip only inside a group, or he will go along with the largest group in depravity. How many millions of supposed strong white men bend over, with enthusiasm, for costumed highwaymen? How many won’t change buying habits a mere jot over leftist derangement? Click over to iSteve and witness, from the head down, one supine career queer after another sniffing negro jock and swapping titillating stats and worshipful tales of their boyhood training in mental servility. They can’t change the channel, much less toss the (((tube))). While (((they’ve))) been training whites, whites have been training them: “You may get away with anything under the correct circumstances.”

    ZERO resistance, because resistance begins as individual integrity, not mass convenience.

    Forget ‘god’; solve the problem of white refusal to break even the more easily broken bonds, and the rest follows. Gay Sailer’s reply to being outed on sportsball fetishism: Such notations are “Hackneyed and ghey”. There are many colors in the homo rainbow—many drugs of addiction.

    • Troll: Fr. John
    • Replies: @Craig Nelsen
    , @anonymous
  2. g8way says:

    In the Bible, God gave the people he was working with a lot of trouble for not completely eliminating their enemies who would inevitably insinuate themselves back into the society and attack again. The West has had the same problem for so long that I’m impressed it lasted twenty centuries. Killing the Western host is going to mostly kill the Parasite too, but I guess the level of hubris and hatred of the host makes that irrelevant.

    • Replies: @Anon
  3. Dutch Boy says:

    Jews seek advancement for themselves not just by use of their talents and industry but by a conscious effort to demoralize the populations they dwell among. This is an ethnic strategy that I believe to be unique and goes well beyond mere ethnic favoritism. It is Satanic. Name a perversion that has not been championed by the organized Jewish community and implemented through their political and economic influence. That is why I think Dr. Jones is on to something that cannot be explained by DNA.

    • Agree: Forgotton_name
  4. Tom Verso says:

    You write:

    “the White race has been defeated by Jewry”

    What color are Russians?

    Russia is rebuilding the Churches the Jews tore down. Just this year the inauguration of the “Russian Military Cathedral” is a good example.

    Putin is regularly see along side of Orthodox priest at various functions. The dedication of the monument of St. Vladimir for example.

    There is voluminous evidence that White Christianity is alive in well in Russia.

    See video of Russia Navy Day. Hundreds of ships with their totally White male crews lining the decks

    Also, commentators on Jewish domination of the Catholic Church, most especially E.M Jones conveniently ignore the Society of Saint Pius X and its 900+ priest world wide who stand de facto against the post Vatican II Jewish Catholic Church.

    For example,
    On July 16, 2021, Pope Francis issued a motu proprio (Latin: “on one’s own initiative”) which essentially dictated that the Latin mass was no longer to be tolerated in Catholic Dioceses.

    The Society thew down the gauntlet three days later (7/19/21) and categorically rejected the Pope’s edict.

    SSPX posted an unoffical response in an article:
    “From Summorum Pontificum to Traditionis Custodes,
    From the Reserve to the Zoo”

    This article
    “gave initial thoughts prepared by the FSSPX.News team”;
    in anticipation of
    “An official statement to be released from the General House of the Society of Saint Pius X in due course.”
    see: (

    Four days later, on July 23rd said “official statement” was published:

    “Letter from the Superior General of the Priestly Society of Saint Pius X,
    in light of the publication of the motu proprio “Traditionis custodes”

    And it is a barn burner.

    My take:
    Francis is put on notice that if he presumes to stop SSPX from saying the Latin Mass,
    he will throw The Church into schism.

    Father Pagliarari in the first paragraph cuts to the chase. He writes in capital letters:


    Well, I’d say that’s the end of the conversation.
    Francis … “the ball is in your court”

    In short, your analysis of the White Race visa vis the Jews is parochial and lacks sociological depth.

    Just as Jones’ analysis of the post Vatican II Church generally and the Latin Mass particularly.

  5. I don’t think Talmudic Jewry necessarily wants to kill off the white race; what they want to do is to kill off Christians. Noahide, doncha know, where rule one says behead “idolators,” that is, those who believe Christ is Lord and Savior–at the behest of the master of Talmudic Jewry, SATAN, with Talmudic Jewry being (as the Bible claims, Revelation 2:9. Revelation 3:9. and also the Book of Jude, and 1 John 2:21 (those that deny the Son deny the Father…) “the Synagogue of Satan.”

  6. hjkl says:

    American whites have been defeated by jewry. But American whites do not constitute all whites. The fact Russia is so often described as an enemy of America by the jew-media should give some indication that Russia is feared by the tribe. Russians know what the jews do to societies, and bear the scars of it. The west may have to be reborn in the east. It would also help whites a lot if they would start standing together for a change.

  7. Anonymous[103] • Disclaimer says:

    Jews fully endorse KM’s evolutionary, materialist philosophy.

    Conversely, Jews hold the most animus toward the views of EMJ, namely, the cross of Christ. That is what they call in detective work, “a clue”.

    Ron Unz has pointed this out:

    “And while religious Judaism has a decidedly negative view towards all non-Jews, Christianity in particular is regarded as a total abomination, which must be wiped from the face of the earth.

    Whereas pious Muslims consider Jesus as the holy prophet of God and Muhammed’s immediate predecessor, according to the Jewish Talmud, Jesus is perhaps the vilest being who ever lived, condemned to spend eternity in the bottommost pit of Hell, immersed in a boiling vat of excrement. Religious Jews regard the Muslim Quran as just another book, though a totally mistaken one, but the Christian Bible represents purest evil, and if circumstances permit, burning Bibles is a very praiseworthy act. Pious Jews are also enjoined to always spit three times at any cross or church they encounter, and direct a curse at all Christian cemeteries. Indeed, many deeply religious Jews utter a prayer each and every day for the immediate extermination of all Christians.”

  8. JWalters says:

    Legendary (work now buried) WWII reporter for the London Times, Douglass Reed, did a deep dive into Zionism. He found a cabal of Jewish bankers started brainwashing the Jewish community into self-segregating shortly after the end of the Babylonian captivity. This gave them a power base and a shield against their Gentile victims of predatory money lending. This band of criminals maintained their racket over centuries, with various political rulers becoming beholden to their money, especially to finance wars. The so-called “Jewish problem” is more precisely a “Jewish criminal problem”. This simple theory also fits the clear fact that there are many Jews today who are resisting these criminals as staunchly as anyone. And their numbers are steadily growing. Here’s an article from a Jewish-run, anti-Zionist website, about a Jewish human rights group who says Israel is an apartheid nation.
    “B’Tselem: Palestinian teen kidnapped, tortured in settler attack”

    Reed’s remarkably in-depth study of Zionism is available free on-line here.
    “The Controversy of Zion”

    • Thanks: IreneAthena
  9. RJH says:

    To solve the equation helps to watch some of Adam Green’s Bitchute videos especially the recent ones. As a jewish rabbi said the ultimate aim of zionism is to destroy the idea of God from the minds of mankind.

    • Agree: Forgotton_name
  10. Franz says:

    Jones’ God couldn’t even save the “Rock” His son/prophet established on Earth. But he’s going to change his colors and start saving us NOW? Let’s assume the battle of the Invisible Friends has been fought and lost.

    With the Roman Church a subsidiary of the Rothschild family, it might be time to say the Middle East abortion of monotheism never had any business in Europe. Because the agents of the new owners are in the process of destroying the original inhabitants of Europe. Obliterating one of the Earth’s major races AND letting us Eurotrash pay the bill! They ain’t after Africa or Asia, only the palefaces: No more the All-White Europe, the Jewish lady says. Jones knows this and wants us to cozy up to the cause.

    Whatever the reason, we need a homeland and the latest in an endless line of New Relations With Jesus ain’t going to work. If the original couldn’t protect Europe as “Christendom” — maybe that means Europeans were lied to.

    It’s therefore time to end the lie of history.

  11. @Tom Verso

    I don’t understand though, why saying mass in Latin would be better, when most people don’t understand Latin. Isn’t understanding « God’s word » a plus ?

  12. You cant defeat something with nothing. You cant defeat the Jews by being nihilistic about the world. The people who think must create a (christian) world view that appeals to the secularist white world that promises a better world, an world where there is a place for everyone inducing other groups and a place for Jews to exist as a people. But a place where whites can develop to be the peoples they were meant to be.

    There is also a hell. The core of Talmudic/Kabbalistic is genocidal against all, both Jew and Gentile. That core will kill many Jews to get to elite rule and kill all Gentiles so that they can have a world of their own. No “idolatry”,particularly Christianity will be allowed in the world (hell) to come.

  13. Mind is not Soul.
    Soul is not Mind.

  14. AndrewR says:
    @Tom Verso

    Putin isn’t gonna sleep with you bro

    • Replies: @profnasty
    , @Anon
  15. @Tom Verso

    Pope Francis might discover just how many traditional and faithful Catholics are happy to walk, if he continues to push his heretically borderline nonsense. Obedience to the Pope has long been central to Catholicism, but that was with an implicit understanding that the Holy Father upheld sacred tradition, instead of cobbling together doctrine from his fever dreams and personal whims.

    Francis claims he wants to bring the Church in line with the world. But a Church playing yes-man to Caesar soon loses any serious reason for being, which the more conspiratorially minded suspect Francis, in fact, knows.

    • Agree: Pierre de Craon
    • Replies: @Peter D. Bredon
  16. G. Poulin says:

    I attend a traditionalist Catholic Church, and I would be just fine with splitting off from Francis and his cabal of commie queers. But it is difficult to get the people in my congregation to see the necessity for this, precisely because “obedience to the Pope has long been central to Catholicism”. Catholics just aren’t comfortable with the idea of telling the pope to eff off, no matter how much he abuses them. They think that if they just double down on saying their rosaries, everything will eventually work out just fine. They even agree with your point that the pope has a responsibility to uphold sacred tradition, as a condition of his employment — but they won’t tell him to go to hell when he doesn’t.

    • Replies: @Peter D. Bredon
  17. apollonian says: • Website

    All of Them, Connelly, KMac, and Jones, Lack “Big Picture” Imagination, Philosophy

    Mr. Connelly brings up useful plausible analysis of the two writers, KMac and Jones, but Connelly, as well as the other two, fail for the larger context: the overall satanic assault upon the over-ripe, over-populated culture now being exploited by Satanists and especially, their leaders, Jews. And that failure especially is in philosophy and history. Jew-question only needs context.

    For Jews couldn’t do anything without willing cohorts within the over-ripe culture, filled w. over-populated inferiors and weaklings, these bred-up by the previously productive economic society in the earlier, healthier stages of the culture, according to that CYCLIC theory of Oswald Spengler in “Decline of the West.”

    And note the large conflict is Truth (= Christ, Gosp. JOHN 14:6) vs. lies and liars (JOHN 8:44) as noted in New Testament. Thus Satanists terrorize and intimidate the over-populated goyim, as we see, exploiting them by means, first, (a) of central-bank and fiat-currency (see for best expo; use their site search-engine for terms like “fiat-currency,” etc.), Satanists making use of literal legalized counterfeiting (“inflation”) to steadily fleecing the stupid goyim, thus (b) enhancing the arsenal of weapons of Satanists, these weapons including such things as the Jews-media and nowadays “Big Pharma” corp.s, now eliminating massive numbers of goyim, etc. “Globalists” (pawns of Satanism, Satanists), are serious about population-reduction.

    So it’s just obvious socio-biology in action, the over-populated masses being methodically exploited and eliminated, enhancing the leading, ruling position of the Satanists against enslaved goyim. Problem then is KMac is NOT philosophic or imaginative enough to recognize Satanism for real, down-to-earth philosophy and ideology it actually is and how it works, Satanism being simply extreme subjectivism, the philosophic notion of consciousness/mind creating reality, making the subject God, the creator–Satanism/subjectivism–as, for example, in philosophy of Immanuel Kant who took the world by storm in the Romantic era after French Rev. Thus KMac fails to see the large forest due to the scientific trees and data which blinds and distracts him.

    Jones however is simply a mystic/subjectivist, hardly a rationalist at all, who fails to see that TRUTH (= Christ) requires the objective reality (Aristotle) as necessary criterion, (a), and (b) that objectivity implies DETERMINISM (absolute cause-effect) which is basis of racialism, and (c) that extreme subjectivism of Talmud/Pharisaism–hence Satanism–Jews being leaders as they’re so distinctively collectivistic and thus ORGANIZED against goyim, including even the goyim allies of Jews who are avowed subjectivists and Satanists, who even vastly out-number Jews (at least, so far). See,, and for best expo on Talmud/Pharisaism.

    So u see, KMac lacks the imagination, while Jones hasn’t got the slightest clue in terms of rationality, Jones hopelessly mired in same old brainless sort of mysticism and ignorance. Evidently, the satanic problem now just has to get worse, more people being mass-murdered, as in the present covid hoax and “scamdemic” before people begin to catching-on to the satanic problem wherein the Jew-question resides. History and sociology are CYCLIC phenomena as Spengler showed.

    • Replies: @Robert Dolan
    , @Mehen
    , @Nancy
  18. Fr. John says:

    May I suggest an even more analytical critique than either Jones or Dr. McD?

    Try procuring a copy of Dr. Joseph Farrell’s ‘God, History, and Dialectic.’ It’s available as a PDF download for a price, but it’s worth it. Written in 1997 or thereabouts, the basic thesis is this:

    “Christian theology has left an indelible imprint, a presupposition, which permeates the “popular histor-iographical consciouness” of the Second (Western) Europe, with its persistent division of History into the tripartite scheme delineated by various sigla: “Ancient History, Mediaeval history, Modern History” or “Classical Ages, Dark or Middle Ages, Modern Age” being the two most popular. The origin of this discernible form is, not surprisingly, the Trinity—Father, Son, and Holy Ghost—or rather, the dialectically formulated and deconstructed “Trinity” of the post-Augustinian Christian West. This Augustinian-Trinitarian civilization, which in these pages is designated “The Second Europe,” was erected on the foundation of the Orthodox and Eastern Europe, which is similarly designated “the First Europe.”

    The basic thesis of these essays is thus that there are Two Europes, Eastern and Western, First and Second respectively, and that both are the effects and consequences of very different and ultimately contradictory theological presuppositions and methods. These essays argue that these different and mutually exclusive presuppositions and methods have permeated every facet of legal, social, and cultural conventions. But to say this is to say nothing new, nor terribly original, and certainly nothing terribly upsetting to the “multiculturalist” or “Judeo-Christian Conservative.”

    The thesis of the Two Europes is explored in these essays from the presupposition that the Western, Second Europe is derivative and aberrant.” – from the Prolegemena

    In short, BOTH Jones and Kevin McD are coming from the same CORRUPT and HERETICAL construct, not from ‘opposing poles.’ And because of that, BOTH OF THEM ARE WRONG.

    As one Orthodox father put it so succinctly, ‘Rome was the FIRST Protestant.’
    “This is most certainly true….” – Luther’s smaller catechism

    Be prepared to have your mind blown.

  19. Fr. John says:
    @Kurt Knispel

    “Mind is not Soul.
    Soul is not Mind.”

    Fools are not wise.
    The wise are not deluded like the fools.

    Thou art a fool. Ps. 14:1

    • Agree: Mehen
  20. chrimony says:

    I intellectually ding him only about 3% for his odd claims dismissing race.

    You what?? It’s THE defining issue of our times. We’re being attacked as a race. We either stand and fight back as a race or fall. And Jones’ answer is to repeat the propaganda of cultural Marxists, and claim it’s just a social construct (though he uses the phrase “category of the mind”). Jones is a disaster for the white race.

    Let’s be explicit what Christianity is: The replacement of European gods with a Jewish god. A god created by self-serving Jews that picked them as the Chosen Ones with a Promised Land. Except the Christian god lacks all the warrior elements, and replaces it with “turn the other cheek” and what amounts to a communist view of life. It’s a religion for peasants.

    There is good and evil in this world. But wrapping them up in Jewish mythology is playing THEIR game.

  21. anonymous[376] • Disclaimer says:

    the all-Jewish-authored Bible book sez:
    “salvation is from the Jews” … a lie

    the West is not gonna make it, by still parsing rabbit holes out of Jewish literature … like a bunch of 1500s ‘holy book’ pedants

    there is no escaping the sheer cruelty of Abrahamic religions, with horrid things like ‘eternal hell’ and a cult around genital mutilation of baby boys

    we need spirituality … but if we can survive, the way to ground ourselves is via Western adaptation of the open-minded incarnation religions, including a good healthy dose of the ancient-India-derived yoga and meditation practices –

    practices which give people what is experienced as direct access to the divine, and direct ‘proof’ to the heart that life is eternal and we never die

    we don’t need no stinkin’ ‘one way is the only way’ Abrahamic holy book

    • Agree: Mehen
    • Replies: @Anonymous300
  22. @apollonian

    You are quite a humorous character to pretend that you know more than Kevin Macdonald.

    • Replies: @apollonian
  23. Maddaugh says:

    By now, healthy numbers of informed people are generally aware of the work of our editor Kevin MacDonald and traditional Catholic thinker E. Michael Jones.

    Much of their influence comes from the fact that both have devoted major portions of their careers to writing about what is absolutely the most pressing issue of our age: The Jewish Question.

    HUH ? I thought that they have been the most pressing issue of every age going back to 733 BC. When over 100 countries have booted these people out over the AGES, that is, the past several thousand years, it cannot be the most pressing of ours.

    Just recently, some remote village in Guatemala of all places, booted these characters out. This was after these Jews fled Canada with the law breathing down their necks.

    The “question” more like the seasonal flu (or plague)>>>>>every year>>>>>>>>which we have to cope with ! If they are the “question” what is the answer ?

    • Replies: @G. Poulin
    , @SafeNow
  24. Rambam says:

    MacDonald looks Jewish and wanted to be a jazz musician. Jones went to Harvard. I wouldn’t trust either one of them farther than I could throw a frozen bagel. Give us their parents and grandparents names (on both sides) so we can do a little background check.

    Both are probably controlled opposition.


    • Replies: @profnasty
    , @Robert Dolan
  25. @chrimony

    Let’s be explicit what Christianity is: The replacement of European gods with a Jewish god. A god created by self-serving Jews that picked them as the Chosen Ones with a Promised Land. Except the Christian god lacks all the warrior elements, and replaces it with “turn the other cheek” and what amounts to a communist view of life. It’s a religion for peasants.

    As much as this article was interesting it left out this position. Guess this idea is still in its infancy without academia support. For the record, don’t know if this thinking is right or wrong. However it is worth consideration given the current state of Christianity.

    Having said that, the Christians of old understood the Jew. It was white royal leaders who embraced Jews ( along with the kosher usury and vice industries). Probably all done to weaken their own people while claiming personal divinity from god. In other words we seem to have always had white affluent people problem. Wonder why?

    • Replies: @Anon
  26. apollonian says: • Website
    @Robert Dolan

    Who’s “Humorous”?

    “More” about what?–is the relevant question and pt. to be made. Note I mentioned “imagination.” KMac knows items, details, and some facts, but then how are they organized?–are they generalized coherently and then contrasted as larger abstractions?

    KMac leaves something to be desired, as I noted. For Judaism is Satanism, and this is what needs be grasped–does KMac do the job? I made my argument and gave ref.s to substantiate my conclusion–that’s what u and other readers need to address, do u think? So address the argument, THEN answer ur own question about “humor,” why don’t u? U’re a regular riot.

    • Replies: @Franklin Ryckaert
  27. @Featherless

    Many faiths have liturgical languages. Islam has Arabic. Judaism has Hebrew. There are Sanskrit, Old Church Slavonic, Ge’ez and, I imagine, others. When Roman Catholics used Latin, the rite was recognizable any place in the world, and Latin imbued it with a sense of transcendance, which is probably what makes it so attractive to those who prefer the Latin mass and so repugnant to those who detest it, like Pope Francis.

  28. An outstanding overview of the two very different, yet, somehow the same, perspectives concerning the eternal Jewish problem.

  29. @Kurt Knispel

    To paraphrase Bill Clinton, it all depends on how you define “is”right?

    • Replies: @Kurt Knispel
  30. Mr. Ed says:

    ‘Pope Frances’ and his cabal of queers is the main reason many are now looking towards Orthodoxy, not Catholicism. Russia, not USSA.

    As for you atheists, you always have ‘muh science’ and ‘muh nihilism’.

  31. I remember my excitement in discovering Kevin MacDonalds first book and greedily devoured all three books as they came out in print. His careful research solidified what I had vaguely suspected all along about the subversive influence of Jewry. He supplied the missing facts and esplained the underlying motivations, of Jews, which served me well as a litmus test to validate my own vague unverified conclusions. Understanding Jewish evolutionary tactics, supplied the missing link in my thinking processes. After Kevin, the puzzle seemed much more understandable.

  32. @Featherless

    It’s not only the language, the Mass has been changed in its focus and in its essence with the Novus Ordo. In the Orthodox Church, many parishes have switched to English rather than Old Slavonic (or those of Slavic background) –but they did not change the essence of their liturgy, just the language. The same thing could have been done in the early 60s (but that was not their intent), switch to English, French, whatever, but keep the liturgy the same in its focus and essence.

  33. @Fr. John

    I tend to write over-long comments.
    My guess is that most people ignore them (probably rightly so).

    I also listen to C Span Washington Journal, that network’s 3 hour call-in show.
    Primary take-away after listening for over 10 years: Most Americans are myna birds uncomprehendingly repeating the phrase they heard last night on tv.

    SOOO —

    Unless you, Fr. John, and Apollonian can condense your 800 words into a bumper sticker, (or a tweet), you’re effort is futile.

    • Replies: @Fr. John
  34. profnasty says:

    Any White American who would lift his sword against Christian Russia, as those who have cut Christian Germany-
    Be Damned.

  35. KMac has always made it very clear about the Jews (collectively) wanting to undermine the host population. One cannot specifically blame Christianity for this. Christianity was in its infancy when the fall of Jerusalem and the destruction of Herod’s temple took place. Although the Talmudic rabbis had less than polite things to write about Jesus and Mary, historically (for a 1,000 years) it was the hand of Christianity that held back large scale slaughter against the Jews. For example, if the Roman Empire had remained thoroughly pagan and didn’t have to worry about the Germanic tribes, another great slaughter of Jews could have occurred – let say at Alexandria (large Jewish population), 200-300 years after the temple was destroyed. It is in the realm of possibility. Don’t tell me that Jews stopped behaving in their traditional manner just because the great part of them were forced into Diaspora?

  36. Papa says:

    EMJ and KM both have philosophical holes in their justification.
    For EMJ it is the Catholic Church and the potential of attracting new parishioners, despite the institution itself falling to Modernism and becoming a mere “temporal power” devoid of spiritual justification (no better than the watered down Christianity of Protestantism).
    For KM it is the the lack of telos in his scientific approach: in a Godless world, Evolution has no purpose or morality or values; it’s merely a force of nature like gravity or the wind. If he adopts the Nietzschean worldview, then the Jews by all means are the winners of the Will-to-Power race and it would evolutionary advantageous to kneel down to this Ubermensch people that can impose their 2+2=5 values onto gentiles. So KM is in a philosophically indefensible position without some sort of external metaphysic that can justify why the Jews are bad and why gentile success are good; it’s like saying of nature why predator lions are inherently bad and why prey gazelles are inherently good. With no metaphysics outside of physics, then there is no greater ethical justification; it may as well be arbitrary/morally relativistic.

    The only synthetic outlet that seems justifiable is through the ethnic Orthodox Churches. Unlike the Catholic Church, they withstood the full jewish assault of the Bolsheviks and were triumphant in the end. They maintain the strict spirituality, traditions, values and morality of the past 2000 years of European man; without the innovations, rationalism, and ad hoc Natural Theological innovations of Catholic and Protestant Churches. And unlike the Catholics and Protestant, they hold ethnic identity, heritage, and history in high regard through the acknowledgment and veneration of their distributed network of ancient ethno-nationalist churches, with the track record of being able to create new autocephalous ethno-churches for nations willing to adopt Orthodoxy.

    • Replies: @Franklin Ryckaert
  37. profnasty says:

    MacDonald looks White (Bam!).
    Jones is White as can be.

    • Replies: @Franklin Ryckaert
  38. @apollonian

    A believe in “Satan” cannot be part of a modern scientific study of a problem. That is not a “lack of imagination, it is scientific consistency.

  39. @profnasty

    “When all tricks of smearing an opponent fail, accuse him of being a crypto-Jew.”

    Rule nr. 666 of the Protocols of the Elders of Zion.

    • Thanks: CelestiaQuesta
  40. Anon[213] • Disclaimer says:

    Russia is the biggest Zionist country in the world..
    And Putin leads the band; biggest killer of all ..

    • Replies: @Craig Nelsen
  41. Anon[213] • Disclaimer says:
    @Old and Grumpy

    Corruption and greed

  42. @chrimony

    Fr. Ripperger states that “virtue is of the soul, race is of the body” He further opines that racial differences are real and that we are to understand them in love and Christian charity*.

    This statement represents the synthesis of the views of KMac and EMJ.

    It is an importing starting point for the author to consider.

    *apparently the youtube account is deleted.

  43. @Papa

    Survival of your own group is more than enough moral justification.
    If I were a gazelle, that would be enough for me to be anti-lion. No metaphysics needed.

    I agree however with you that Eastern Ordodox churches that are ethnic-oriented, are better prepared to withstand subversion in the name of “universalism”.

    • Agree: Mehen
    • Replies: @Papa
    , @Anon
  44. Anon[159] • Disclaimer says:

    The reason these end times we are all in, are completely dominated by Jews, and their misdeeds and crimes, is that the end times are completely Satan’s.

    Jews are Satan’s people. Christ said so himself.

    We have two choices (((maybe three, if you count joining the tribe))).

    1. Tell, and Live by the Truth. And Suffer Martyrdom, of various kinds.

    2. Hide from the Truth, and try to avoid Martyrdom.

    The First assures a place in the ranks with Christ in the next world, with dignity and self intact.

    The Second assures an eternity of shame.

    Choose. If you refuse to choose, you have chosen #2.

  45. @anonymous

    Interesting, I thought only a jew would say something like this since jews always say exactly what you said. But apparently now people who claim to be anti jews are repeating the exact same jewish talking points. With antisemites like yourself, who needs jews? You’re a judaizer through and throught.

  46. @Fr. John

    apologies to Fr John for my obnoxious comment @ #33..
    It was frustration talking.

    the source of frustration: HOW DO WE BREAK OUT OF THE UNZ BUBBLE?

    Many on this forum will seek out Farrell’s God, History, and Dialectic. I probably will.

    But how to turn what is learned into action to solve an overwhelming problem?

    I’ve typed over a million words on this forum and the situation has only gotten worse. Only difference is now I know who is f&%ing with me & how/why they’re doing it.

    • Replies: @IreneAthena
  47. Hardrock says: • Website

    Quote from article:
    I’m inching my way away from the Existential belief that our presence here on this Earth is meaningless, for it appears indisputable that Jewish existence has some sort of meaning, and, if their existence has meaning, so should ours. End quote.

    I have many of the same questions as the author regarding purpose; these are the main subjects of….. so I read eagerly to find subsequent references to the statement, “if their existence has meaning, so should ours.” If he described this possible meaning…this existential question, I missed it.

    Indisputable….meaning? What is it?

  48. “…the Existential belief that our presence here on this Earth is meaningless, for it appears indisputable that Jewish existence has some sort of meaning, and, if their existence has meaning, so should ours.”

    You don’t need Jews to have a meaning for existence to have one for the goyim…the two are mutually exclusive.

  49. Papa says:
    @Franklin Ryckaert

    As the author correctly noted early in the article, survival isn’t justification enough as there is no transcendent aim: without God everything is ultimately nihilistic since we’re in a decaying material box. There is no “winner” if everything in the Universe is ultimately crushed by entropy: 1000 year Reich or even 1,000,000,000 year Reich doesn’t matter since it all goes unceremoniously in the chessboard at the end. That’s the fundamental flaw of materialist worldviews even with pseudo-spiritual notions sprinkled on top. One could make the equally justified argument that in a world of suffering with no purpose, the best evolutionary adaption isn’t to survive but to just not exist. And frankly, that’s the direction that modern philosophy is leading mankind toward: misanthropy and antinatalism.

    Meanwhile with Orthodoxy, you can apply Theosis on a national level: elevate your people into saints not just in the life but beyond as well. A saint doesn’t lose his history and identity when becoming a saint; in fact those things were ontologically essential in becoming one: who you are, where you are from, how did you get to where you are. We’ve become so demoralized insofar as believing that just being/surviving as a average citizen is “good enough” that we’ve forgotten the heights of what man could be; what groups of men could be. Hell, modern man is so metaphysically ill that he forgets what a saint even looks like if they were presented with one. So cynical that they’ll think it’s some kind of virtue signaling bit or scam, not realizing that they are standing face-to-face with a better man, a truly transcendent man beyond mere suffering and surviving.

    • Agree: Mulegino1
    • Thanks: BlackFlag
  50. Anon[237] • Disclaimer says:
    @Franklin Ryckaert

    The problem with your kind is that you can’t make-up your mind, one day you hate the Jews the next you give them Palestine and hate Muslims to honour the former.
    It’s like you have a hate list where the Jews are at the bottom.
    It’s so funny how you jump from one of your victims to the next by priority.
    Good thing you have no influence at all

    • Replies: @Franklin Ryckaert
  51. What I learned from this essay is, KM, Jones, Connelly, UNZ, and a brave brigade of writers here and elsewhere have exposed the beast’s belly, and now is the time to poke it’s weakness.
    While growing up oblivious to powers of influence, by the time I finished K12, they had molded my outlook just as planned. To become awakened, I endured mental withdrawals as if I were a drug addict. The constant denial, questioning, back and forth mental infighting, until you succumb to your demons and realized the damage done. The realization of betrayal finally hits home, and that’s when you’ve cut free chains of self hate. The healing process is never ending, the pain of knowing is worse than the pain of blind existence.
    It’s taken years withdrawing from 24/7/365 indoctrination heaved on me from everything I touch, see and hear. Even the smell and taste of self hate becomes bitter as the desire to seek spirits of drugs to ease the pain of suffering becomes my most profound challenge through life.
    I’d like to believe that a messiah will arise and lead me to glory, but from looking out the watch tower, all I see are the blind being led by the blind, while our illustrious overlords keep laughing on their way to the bank.

    • Replies: @geokat62
  52. @Walter Duranty

    Truth is right.
    Truth is true.
    There can always only be one truth.


  53. Bill P says:

    Very few people have an intellectual understanding of what Jones is getting at with Logos and the Trinity, and I think he could do a better job of explaining it. Contemporary Christians are overwhelmingly confused and clueless about the Trinity, but it doesn’t have to be this way. It isn’t impossible to understand it rationally. It is the basis of reason, after all.

    • Agree: Houston 1992
  54. “In our desperate hour, maybe that’s all we can do. I’m running out of other.”

    It’s a pathetic statement from one who believes in the greatest race that ever lived and conquered most of the world, known as well as unknown. Whatever happened to the revolutionary spirit?

    • Replies: @Rocha
  55. BorisMay says:

    Leaders are not writers and writers are not leaders.

    Whites need a leader who can inclusively combine all the different factions that are portrayed by these and other writers.

    The Jew is a master of the lie. Deception, destruction and hate are his tools. (You can clearly see this in Israel where they deceive the world, destroy everything around them and sew hate amongst all people).

    St Michael fought the dragon in the spirit world, and the whites must fight the Jewish dragon here in earth too.

    You can’t do deals with evil because evil is a lie. You can only destroy the lie and its perpetrators. At this point the lie will wither. But it must be faced with irrevocable power that can only destroy.

    Like St Michael the whites must go to war. There is no other option to avoid slavery, humiliation and, ultimately, extermination.

  56. Hardrock says: • Website

    Agreed regarding misanthropy and antinatalism….I’m halfway there and reading Emil Cioran so….just a matter of time.

    Your views do stir the imagination but if there is absolute truth in the universe I find it difficult to dismiss because I want things to be a certain way. God certainly doesn’t make things easy….even for those who seek him. Then again maybe it’s just consciousness demanding an escape hatch for us poor mortals.

  57. UR2 says:

    The 1st thing is to recognize that kmac doesn’t stand on the side of science, as all evolutionist don’t. The source of evidence for evolution lies in paleontology exclusively. That record, written in stone, is where one would observe the changes a species undergoes. Instead, the fossil record shows exclusively that every lifeform appeared fully formed at their initial appearance and showed zero change throughout their period of existence, whether it was for thousands or tens of thousands of years. This is true for all vertebrates as well as invertebrates. Every geology student learns this in their sophmore year. There is an amazing degree of compexity and variety in the creatures of the -really ancient- Cambrian sea. Also, the fossil record shows no ‘intermediate’ specimens.
    As for genetics, the genome and what it means, you are all deeply in the hands of deceivers, liars, egoists and the deluded.

  58. Mevashir says:

    In my estimation, the contrasting foundations of these two men’s analyses mirror the larger Western conflict we’ve all seen for five hundred-plus years with the struggle between our inherited Christian past, with belief in faith, souls, spirits, and—most of all—God, vs. rationalism, humanism, and materialism—in other words, a strongly scientific worldview.

    Why is this the fault of Jews? America was a revolutionary society founded on Enlightenment ideals melded to Deistic and Masonic forms of spirituality. There was not one single Jewish political theorist among the American Founders. You need to admit that American revolutionary ideology is the root problem, not Judaism or Jews. Ditto for EMJ and KM: they are scapegoating Jews for the revolutionary ideals of America’s Gentile Protestant Founders!

    (I am not disputing that Jews have flourished and prospered to unimaginable heights in America’s Enlightenment Revolutionary society. However if you want to be honest, you must identify the true root causes and not just snarl at the later symptoms!)
    I note how joyful this Hassid appears in contrast to the perpetual sourpuss faces of EMJ and KM.

  59. @Papa

    “…survival isn’t justification enough as there is no transcendent aim…”

    Mere survival may not be enough for an ideological justification, but on a basic, instinctual level it suffices. If you don’t believe that, watch people fighting to reach the lifeboats on a sinking ship. Under normal circumstances, people still rather live than die, and they are prepared to struggle for that.

    “…One could make the equally justified argument that in a world of suffering with no purpose, the best evolutionary adaption isn’t to survive but to just not exist…”

    Actually, that is the idea of Buddhism, and Buddhism is not materialistic.

    Orthodoxy has the idea of “sainthood”, but so does Catholicism. I don’t think however the West will ever be won over by Orthodoxy. The West is in serious spiritual crisis, but I don’t see any form of Christianity being able to answer that.

  60. geokat62 says:

    Ditto for EMJ and KM: they are scapegoating Jews for the revolutionary ideals of America’s Gentile Protestant Founders!

    It’s was the ideology of Founding Fathers that resulted in the Hart-Celler Act of 1965, which fundamentally changed the demographics of the country and not Jewish Supremacist Organizations, like the AJC et. al?

    It’s was the ideology of Founding Fathers that resulted the Anti-White Hate (better known as CRT) and not the Jewish Supremacist propagandists from the Frankfurt School?

    It wasn’t the ADL who coined the phrase “Diversity Is A Strength”?

    The whole “woke” ideology that was spawned from the counter-cultural revolution of the 1960s is the fault of the Founding Fathers and not the Frankfurt School?

    Who knew!

    • Replies: @Mevashir
    , @Nancy
  61. @Anon

    “…The problem with your kind is that you can’t make-up your mind, one day you hate the Jews the next you give them Palestine and hate Muslims to honour the former…”

    Well, that can be explained. I want Jews to be removed from Western societies, but since I am not genocidal, I want them to be repatriated to a country of their own. That country should be Palestine, because that is the place they originally came from.
    Leaves of course the problem what to do with the Palestinians. When Israel was created in 1948 there were only 1,3 million Palestinians. They could easily have been resettled in Transjordan, which would then be their own state.

    Things did not work out that way and there are now world wide 11 million Palestinians.
    Ideally they still could be given their own state in Libya, which is underpopulated and needs reconstruction. All Jews from the world should then settle in Israel, which would include Gaza and the West Bank but not the Golan Heights. Israel should then be accepted in the Arab World via a greater “Abraham Accord”.

    But I am aware of the fact that world problems seldom find ideal solutions. Muddling through is mostly what happens.

    As for Muslims, I don’t like them, but they have the right to their own countries, without being attacked under false pretexts, such as happened with Afghanistan, Iraq, and Libya.

    • Replies: @Anon
  62. Dumbo says:

    I am not a great fan of neither although both have written interesting stuff. However both have gaps.

    My own view is that there are supernatural elements involved, and it is impossible to understand Jews and Jewish/European history (or really, what’s happening now) without that in mind.

    But I can’t explain it.

  63. SMK says: • Website
    @Kurt Knispel

    The mind is real, the “soul” is a fantasy. The mind is a reality that exists because humans have brains. that exist withiin their bodies. Consciousness is an effect of having a brain in a body iwth senses, of which eye-sight is paramount and hearing is of secondary importance. The self-consciojsness or mind of humans can only be explained by the superiotity of the human brain.

    If the brains of humans, including the brains of geniuses, could exist apart from the body and never existed within a body with eyes to see and read and ears to hear and thus to learn and acquire knowledge, they would know nothing, they’d be totally ignorant. Not only would they not be self-conscious, they would not even be conscious, conscious of the external world, including other humans and animals.

    • Replies: @SMK
    , @Mehen
    , @Kurt Knispel
  64. Though I know less of Kevin MacDonald than I do of E. Michale Jones, I align with the author as to why. Christianity vs Science and the history of both makes the choice easy. Science has been hijacked and turned into a tool, a cudgel, to smash the concept of God, and you cant do that without crushing the Catholic Church. But there’s hope. As pointed out in the article the young are turning, if not to church, to God. And it’s not just the young. Quite a few who I know, and are in my age (70) group, have returned to the Church.
    When society is no longer recognizable, when everything seems nonsensical and upside down, contrdictory and illogical, what’s left? Logos.

  65. SMK says: • Website

    The first passage you quote from Jones is inchoherent and contradictory. How can “our thoughts” be “independent of the functioning of our brains” if “human can’t have minds unless they have brains” in bodies with senses, of which eye-sight is paramount and hearing is of secondary importance.

    And where is this “soul” that ascends to heaven or descends to hell” for eternity as an intangible spirit and disemboided mind after the death of the body and brain?

    • Replies: @Franklin Ryckaert
  66. Dumbo says:

    I note how joyful this Hassid appears in contrast to the perpetual sourpuss faces of EMJ and KM.

    He’s probably celebrating the demise of European people, or the death of the Christians, or something like that. 😀 😛

    • Replies: @Featherless
  67. Robjil says:

    I am not disputing that Jews have flourished and prospered to unimaginable heights in America’s Enlightenment Revolutionary society. However if you want to be honest, you must identify the true root causes and not just snarl at the later symptoms!)

    Whatever the Enlightenment did for Gentiles, can be talked about, like any other rulers of the past. Our present rulers the Jewish Supremacists for the past 108 years, came up with a new gimmick, to stay at the top forever, control of the Media. It has worked like a charm.

    The control of Fiat money system is the other big factor. Media control quiets any mention of that one.

    Hasids and the Amish are both happy since they have their own tribal family to vibe with. It is like that in all such insular communities.

    Unz and other such ilk is doing a good job in giving some cracks to the Jewish MSM Titanic.

    Ancient Egypt was ruled for 108 years by a Semitic people called the Hyksos.
    12.23.1913 to 2021 is 108 years. Is this the reason for the intense fear that Jewish Supremacists have shown in the past few years to censor so much?

    108 years.
    The Theban revolt spread northward under Kamose, and about 1521 Avaris fell to his successor, Ahmose, founder of the 18th dynasty, thereby ending 108 years of Hyksos rule over Egypt. Although vilified in some Egyptian texts, the Hyksos had ruled as pharaohs and were listed as legitimate kings in the Turin Papyrus.

    It is interesting that the Hyksos arose to power in a way similar to the Jews in the west and in Russia. It was an internal rise to power for the Hyksos and for our present Jewish rulers.

    The findings of the research also showed that there was a huge influx of Hyksos into Egypt centuries before they took control of the country. “This is consistent with the supposition that, while the ruling class had Near Eastern origins, the Hyksos’ rise to power was not the result of an invasion, as popularly theorized, but an internal dominance and takeover of foreign elite”, the researchers wrote in the study.

  68. @Featherless

    “Shut up or burn,” the Trad Pope explained.

  69. @Kolya Krassotkin

    You sound like an old time commie bitching about Gorbachev. Francis is trying to root out the pederasts by updating the anti-sex moral dogmas they installed as cover. A sort of moral perestroika. But you’re all “Stop him, It’s gonna blow!”

    • Replies: @Kolya Krassotkin
  70. @SMK

    Have you never heard of near death experiences? People who left their bodies, saw their bodies lying on the bed and had experiences in the beyond, in which they still had thoughts and emotions? Out-of-the-body experiences can also happen during meditation.

    • Replies: @Featherless
    , @SMK
  71. @G. Poulin

    “ Francis and his cabal of commie queers”

    The cabal has been running the Church since Paul VI and his boyfriend, Jacques Maritain. Those are the forces squealing as their cover is blown. (For example, Benedict and his boyfriend Georg (aka on Grindr)

    • Replies: @Seraphim
  72. Drew says:

    “Witness today’s knee-jerk reaction to the Catholic Church’s repression of Galileo…”

    Ironically, Galileo was repressed by the church for teaching contrary to the scientific consensus of his day.

    • Replies: @Kratoklastes
  73. What has happened is that the Western invention of of science, industry and technology has been so impressive and earth shattering, and has improved our earthly existence to such a remarkable degree, that Whites have began to worship “Science.” And the worship of “Science” is the worship of ourselves instead of the God who made us. That is our basic heresy. We will have to disavow this heresy and return to God and Christ; thanking them for making us so that Whites have had the ability to invent the modern world.
    Jews early on were true to their parasitic nature and began to promote the false White religion of “Science” in ways that negated its positive effects by reducing the human race to lab rats (Whites) ruled over by “Social Scientists” (Leftist Jews).
    The Jews have systematically destroyed everything Whites have built, and we have let them. The two Wars of White Suicide left us particularly vulnerable to a false sense of guilt toward nonWhites, and to a large extent the two world wars were fought at the behest of the Jews.
    And make no mistake; Jews are NOT Whites. They are the self-declared enemies of Whites and a malignant social cancer.
    It comes down to the simple fact that the Jews and their nonWhite foot soldiers are the deadly enemies of Whites. It is time to fight them by any means necessary to achieve total victory.

  74. Not to worry; once Francis is deposed, and a real, manly man like Cardinal Burke is on the Throne of Peter, things will be OK again.

  75. When America was healthy, this is how we dealt with the likes of E. Michael Jones:

    • Replies: @Zumbuddi
  76. SafeNow says:

    When over 100 countries have booted these people out over the AGES, that is, the past several thousand years, it cannot be the most pressing….what is the answer ?

    In Philip Roth’s “The Counterlife,” Maria, dumping Zukerman:

    “Dissension and contentiousness put a spring in your heel…
    Why this obsession with irresolvable conflict? Don’t you want a new mental life?”

    In other words, “booting-out” on a personal level is often possible. At least there’s that, to keep in mind, for when it occurs. But on the national level, today is different from the past several thousand years. Today those traits could result in a world war and a nuclear ash pile.

  77. Zumbuddi says:
    @James J O'Meara

    You got some kind of hat fetish, O’Meara?

  78. @schnellandine

    The problem is failure to stand individually.

    the mutton-headed insistence on which, of course, guarantees we will continue to fail.

    The only hope we have to avoid annihilation is group solidarity–i.e., organizing–the opposite of “standing individually.” Steve Sailer recognized this decades ago, which is probably why Sailer has had a major impact on the intellectual life of the right and you haven’t. And a good thing, too, because if there is one thing we don’t need more of, it is attacking our own over everything that doesn’t matter.

    • Replies: @schnellandine
  79. Mevashir says:

    ….It wasn’t the ADL who coined the phrase “Diversity Is A Strength”?…

    Your points are valid but irrelevant to the quote highlighted from the main article:

    In my estimation, the contrasting foundations of these two men’s analyses mirror the larger Western conflict we’ve all seen for five hundred-plus years with the struggle between our inherited Christian past, with belief in faith, souls, spirits, and—most of all—God, vs. rationalism, humanism, and materialism—in other words, a strongly scientific worldview.

    rationalism, humanism, and materialism are products of the Enlightenment and the values of the Founding Fathers. If EMJ wants to be honest, he should admit that his brand of Fundamentalist Catholicism is TOTALLY INCOMPATIBLE with Revolutionary America. See the infamous Vatican Document Syllabus of Errors that condemns every one of the American Bill of Rights:

    Patriots like the KKK hated Catholics as much as they hated Jews, perhaps even more. And today we have 7/9 Bill-of-Rights-hating Roman Catholic SCrOTUS (in)Justices!

    What a joke and what a testimony to the stupidity of American Protestants!

    • Agree: CauCasiAnn
    • Replies: @CauCasiAnn
  80. @Mevashir

    “I note how joyful this Hassid appears in contrast to the perpetual sourpuss faces of EMJ and KM.”

    That’s because he just picked pockets of EMJ and KM… No wonder he is smiling.

  81. @Anon

    Russia is the biggest Zionist country in the world..
    And Putin leads the band; biggest killer of all ..

    If that were true, Chuck Schumer wouldn’t have had a fit of apoplexy when Trump and Putin met alone without any Jews in attendance. “That must not be allowed to happen again,” he said, while threatening to have the translator arrested and forced to confess all.

    • Replies: @AndrewR
    , @sally
  82. @Rambam

    You win the prize for the most absurd comment in the thread.

    Macdonald and Jones are both as white as can be, and both have IQ’s much higher than yours.

    KMAC’s work is brilliant.

    I walked around in a furious fog for weeks after reading “The Culture of Critique.” The truth of his work jumps off of every page.

    So…..the second most hated man in America (next to David Duke) is “controlled opposition?”

    Why are you even here?

  83. ebear says:

    The invention of movable type (Johannes Gutenberg 1400-1468) made possible the mass production and distribution of The Bible in the vernacular. For the first time, educated laymen could read the entire Book in their native language, without the intercession of a priesthood who, as interpreters of The Book, selected only those parts which, in their view, were conducive to leading the flock, thus avoiding the many problems they themselves encountered in reconciling apparent contradictions and questions of interpretation which they’d been struggling with internally for centuries (Nicaea I & II) and which were the source of various schisms and accusations of heresy.

    The question of whether the Mass should be read in Latin, Greek or even Aramaic, is mooted by the fact that anyone interested in the Works and Word of Christ can read about it in their own language, from a Book that, since Gutenberg, has been translated into nearly every language on Earth.

  84. Mehen says:

    Thanks for this essay.

    To be sure, KMac’s account could be right — and probably is. Over the millennia, Jews have evolved adaptive behavior that ensures their survival and puts them on top. But honestly, it’s really just too … “uncanny,” which is why EMJ’s Christian approach has, against my desire, it seems, pulled me toward belief in a spiritual battle rather than a merely biological and social one.

    Your thinking and personal journey parallels mine in many ways these past two years.

    It’s encouraging to witness it in Anglin as well.

    • Replies: @Robert Dolan
    , @Gapeseed
  85. Mehen says:

    I think your analysis would be improved by distinguishing between facts and values. Values, in large part, are subjective. Facts/datum are objective.

  86. @Craig Nelsen

    The problem is failure to stand individually.

    the mutton-headed insistence on which, of course, guarantees we will continue to fail.

    Leave it to an iStever drone to assume that an ability to stand individually nullifies, rather than enhances, a political group. If that’s the sort of ‘major impact on the intellectual life of the right’ you hold dear, keep it with you into the grave.

    BTW, what are you doing here? Sailer has another “It’s almost as if” NYT exposé you must read and comment on. Here, boy!

  87. Mehen says:

    Google “The Hard Problem Of Consciousness”

    Once you’ve solved the problem, get back to us.

    • Replies: @SMK
  88. IreneAthena says: • Website

    Many on this forum will seek out Farrell’s God, History, and Dialectic. I probably will.

    But how to turn what is learned into action to solve an overwhelming problem?

    Recognizing that the problem is in fact overwhelming is the first step for those seeking a way to solve it: ultimately, we mere humans in our own strength are powerless against the darkness on this planet. There is a Power to whom we must yield, higher than ourselves and higher than Satanically-powered human agents of evil and higher than their demonic strings-pullers.

    The wrath of man does not accomplish the purposes of God, for this wrath is often mis-directed at the wrong people, potential allies, who even in their deluded state are not beyond mercy and restoration by our Creator.

    St. Paul invites Christ’s followers, from the most physically frail to those who are strong and called to protect the weak, to engage in the spiritual battle that precedes success in defeating evil on earth. These spiritual warriors go in first, like the Marines. “We battle not against flesh and blood, but against spiritual wickedness in high places.” “Put on the full armor of God… the shield of faith with which you will be able to extinguish all the fiery darts of the evil one…”

    Part of that battle is prayer on the behalf of truth-seekers and lie-exposers, especially the ones who have not yet discovered the truth that they can talk to God themselves. The battle against truth is fierce.

    • Replies: @Nancy
  89. @Featherless

    The Latin mass is understandable to anyone who wants to understand it and is an effective continuum to the origins. It is different from street talk which adds to the feeling of it being holy and special and not rap.

  90. Seraphim says:

    Historically the JQ arises from the opposition and active fight of Jews against the Church founded by the Christ and its worldview. By erasing it one places himself objectively on the side of the Jews further promoting their ’cause’ (albeit unwittingly). Sadly, KM is a case in point.

  91. Anon[213] • Disclaimer says:
    @Franklin Ryckaert

    Like I said hate both but you got a soft spot for jews.
    Resettling 1.3 million people is easy? How exactly would you have done that? Call in Hitler’s army?
    Why would you wanna do that when they too are semites and have been living there 4000 years? And who are you, the u.n. rep here?
    Why did the Jews leave?
    Why are there 120 u.n. resolutions condemning so called Israel?
    I leave you with a comment I got here that depicts the kind of brains you got:

    “Interesting, I thought only a jew would say something like this since jews always say exactly what you said. But apparently now people who claim to be anti jews are repeating the exact same jewish talking points. With antisemites like yourself, who needs jews? You’re a judaizer through and through”…

    Resettle them all, he says, boy that’s new!

    Not even Weissman thought that!

    • Replies: @Franklin Ryckaert
  92. Ryan2 says:

    “ I’m inching my way away from the Existential belief that our presence here on this Earth is meaningless, for it appears indisputable that Jewish existence has some sort of meaning, and, if their existence has meaning, so should ours.”

    Is this supposed to be a serious statement or meant to be wicked sarcastic?

  93. @Mehen

    The battle rages on all fronts; biological, social, political, economic, spiritual.

    But KMAC’s solution to the problem (white’s organizing to claim their right to self determination)

    makes more logical sense than EMJ’s solution (convert non-whites and jews to Catholicism)

    White unity/empowerment is the obvious necessity.

    While converting people to faith in God is a good thing, IMHO, it won’t solve the race issue…..because the tribal/ racial spoils system is already set, and might well have a biological basis anyway. Organized jewry has magnified and exploited racial differences to divide people, while deracinating innocent gullible whites.

    In my experience, non-white Christians/Catholics put group loyalty above loyalty to God, and this is why they vote 80% left (while the left is relentlessly ANTI-Christ/ANTI-white)

    Yes, it would be magnificent to witness the whole crew of nation wreckers being thrown into The Lake of Fire….and such thoughts can be very satisfying. But in the meantime we have to deal with the issue of the ethnic cleansing of white people worldwide. And the stupid degenerate Pope is on board with white genocide.

    So, yeah….if you have the patience to preach the Gospel to the jews and the blacks, by all means go for it….but conversion won’t stop them from exercising outgroup hostility toward white people.

    • Disagree: Mehen
  94. Nancy says:
    @Kurt Knispel

    Well, I guess if you say so!

    • LOL: schnellandine
    • Replies: @Kurt Knispel
  95. @Drew

    IronicallyUnsurprisingly, Galileo was repressed by the church for teaching contrary to the scientific political consensus of his day.


    As with today, the ‘consensus’ at the time of Galileo was conditioned on the fact that deviating from a specific doctrinal line was the ultimate CLM (career-limiting move).

    As with today, the people enforcing the doctrinal line assert that their evidence is inerrant and any evidence to the contrary is tainted by the very fact that it’s contrary.

    Mask up; isolate yourself; get jabbed. The Holy Trinity.

    Although the Holy Trinity of the Cult of Covid has slightly worse predictive power than geocentrism, it must be noted that the Doomers are working on new epicycles for their next set of pronouncements.

    The new pronouncements are also to be taken as inerrant, and may not be examined for consistency with past inerrant pronouncements, under pain of career death.

    Any paradigm where a key premise is the existence of a transcendent supernatural entity who acts intentionally in the affairs of men, is a perfect example of why doxa is inferior to episteme. It should be expected to yield inferior results – and lo and behold, it does.

  96. Nancy says:

    As long as it makes sense to you 🙂

    • Replies: @apollonian
  97. Nancy says:

    I agree… when one is overwhelmed and the battle is lost… nothing left but to try the ‘unthinkable’ (at least to the atheist), i.e., a ‘faithless’ prayer… can’t lose much with a Hail Mary pass… and, who truly ‘knows’, but Someone may be listening : )

    (“….but from some planet far, a child may watch us and exclaim, “see the pretty shooting star”… sorry, couldn’t help myself 🙂

    • Replies: @IreneAthena
  98. anonymous[333] • Disclaimer says:

    Things I dont understand about Jews. They claimed being chosen by god…BUT they are not racists?? supremacists?? …Even while claiming such exclusivity they say that the goyim MUST obey jewish laws??…The Torah, Talmud are jewish books that apply to goyim also???…Even as Rabbis claimed that jews are god people…I have never seen any Rabbis oppose abortions, lgbt, pornography, etc. And eventhough jews are usually the ones that created/fudn\$\$ . created/run pornography, sex trafficker, etc. Rabbis NEVER admonished the jews that usually run 90% of those sexual deviants…enterprisses..Jews had achieve great power economic/political within Christian WHITE societeies and yet they HATE white/christian/ why???

  99. @chrimony

    No one will touch the race question which also surrounds the Creator’s indivisible atom/Adam vs. the anti-truth manufacturer of the hybrids.

    Clearly, CERN understands this as shown in their “dance” video “Symmetry” which can be viewed on YT.

  100. @Anon

    If you want to get rid of the Jews without proposing genocide, you will have to think of resettlement. Ressettling 1,3 million locals to a nearby country to make place for 15 million Jews from all over the world seems to be a lesser problem to me. Greater population exchanges have taken place in recent history, such as Greeks vs. Turks with the creation of Greece and Hindus vs. Muslims with the creation of India. Sort of that already took place with the creation of Israel when 750,000 Palestinians were expelled from Palestine, while shortly after 800,000 Jews from Arab countries were expelled and moved to Israel. But don’t worry, my solution will not happen, and the Middle East will muddle through.

    If not having genocidal fantasies about Jews makes me “suspicious” in your eyes, then so be it. Even people we don’t like have a right to live, but of course we can demand moral behavior.

  101. Nancy says:

    I believe Jones’ idea of ‘weaponization’ applies…. a beneficial impulse can be twisted, slanted, transmogrified, to become a subtle or viscious weapon against the Termites’ host. Even the Founding Fathers’ initial goals may have been beneficial, until their arms were opened to the ‘poor’ persecuted Jews (not long before Morgan was cheating the Union Army, etc ).

  102. @anonymous

    Jews had achieve great power economic/political within Christian WHITE societeies and yet they HATE white/christian/ why???

    I’d start by assuming, for brevity, that the reason isn’t rational. Might it arise from an inner ugliness, often combined with a matching outer?

  103. @Mevashir

    People are blind as a bat mitzvah. Catholic church: “Anal and oral same-sex is A-OK, but vaginal must be virginal.”

    That Brett Kavanaugh, for example, is a Jesuit like Francis. Just what we need. John Roberts, closet-queer, gave us Obamacare so it would be easier to kill us through fake medicines and contraptions like Theranos’ “The Edison” (which never worked) or those Janus PCR tests giving false positives for covid.

    And just how are they any different?

    • Replies: @Robert Dolan
  104. IreneAthena says: • Website

    No need to apologize, Nancy. One of those “fiery darts” is the sense that one’s prayers have fallen to earth unheard, as if the sky were an iron dome. Maybe prayers offered, even while those fiery darts are flying, especially touch God’s heart : “pretty shooting stars” indeed, evidence that someone is listening to the evidence that God is good, in spite of all the horrors (hatred, murder, lies) the Enemy inspires to try to convince us otherwise.

  105. @CauCasiAnn

    I’ve pissed some Unz people off by speaking out against Catholics (by the way I have some in my own family)

    The SC is filled with them and they are useless cucks, all.

    Biden, Pelosi, ACB, Brett Kavanaugh, Roberts, Paul Ryan, John Boehner, Ted Kennedy, etc.

    For reasons that I am unable to comprehend, most Catholics (85%) are shithead liberals.

    All of the border jumpers from mexico, guatemala, el salvador, south america, etc., are far left marxist losers. But the GOP continues to claim they are natural conservatives (They are NOT)

    Generally speaking, Catholics tend to be the very worst of all the shabbos goy sellouts. I’m not sure if this relates historically to the old rift between Catholics and Protestants, or if it can be attributed to sheer idiocy, but Catholics seem to love carrying water for the nation wrecking small hats.

  106. @anonymous

    “I have never seen any Rabbis oppose abortions, lgbt, pornography, etc. And even though jews are usually the ones that created/fund \$\$ created/run pornography, sex trafficker, etc.”

    You’re forgetting the Prime Directive:

    If it harms the goyim, then it’s good for the Jews.

    • Replies: @anonymous
  107. Nancy says:

    Simple, he Hassid knows he’s winning the ‘game’. and KMac and EMJ know they are not….. at the moment. Hopefully, always darkest before the dawn, and the Hassid will have his time to wail…. when the vax finishes playing out in Israel, perhaps ?

  108. Anon[336] • Disclaimer says:

    In the Bible, God gave the people he was working with a lot of trouble for not completely eliminating their enemies who would inevitably insinuate themselves back into the society and attack again.

    Which, ironically enough, is the exact MO used by his ACOA children.

    Jehovah’s nothing if not a single wine-mom.

  109. @Dumbo

    « I note how joyful this Hassid appears in contrast to the perpetual sourpuss faces of EMJ and KM. »

    « He’s probably celebrating the demise of European people, or the death of the Christians, or something like that. 😀 😛 »


    Or just on his way to the bank.

  110. @Franklin Ryckaert

    « Out of body experiences » might just be « inside the mind » experiences, with sensory deprivation.

    • Replies: @Nancy
  111. AndrewR says:
    @Craig Nelsen

    Wait what? Please share a source for this

  112. sally says:
    @Craig Nelsen

    Each class of mind control involves a set of elements.. Here we present the IPIPD class of propaganda inverted protected infringed produced & distributed (IPIPD) propaganda.

    <=inversion.<=protected space\ interest< infringe <=propaganda <= distribute to target audience.

    inversion <=church imperialism trumps scientific findings
    protected space or interest <= Jewish power <=a consequence of scientific findings
    infringement <=claims church imperialism violates monopoly on political power and wealth.
    propaganda <=contents claiming protected space infringed are produced into propaganda
    (a study, report, book, newscast, video, or article, etc. ).
    distribution to target audience <= access of content to media controlled by narrative selection?
    all media is privately owned <= MSM sells content access to its audience in the form of advertising.
    financial support for media <= is either audience supported or third party supported.
    tax deductible advertising supports MSM <=private non media imperial enterprises pay the media bills.
    everything about main stream media is private, its management, its ownership,etc. no one is focusing on the content providers that media presents?

    These are some of the elements of mind control. Propaganda is a tool of mind control technology.
    Mind control engineering depends on content embedded in propaganda and access to audiences media owns.

    from the article "MacDonald emphasizes that if Whites cannot adopt a counter strategy to the current Jewish group evolutionary one, our prospects are doubtful. Anglin, too, has admitted that The West has lost to the Jews and now is the time merely to survive."

    He who controls content access to the audience the media gates will always be the winner..

  113. modern man so proud of reason
    pursues happiness in every season
    regarding faith as superstition
    to be a master of his condition.
    reality catches up with him
    finding all under jewry’s whim.
    whoever rejected the True God Christ
    ends up submitting to the antichrist
    there are only two options, can’t you tell?
    light/darkness, life/death, heaven or hell.
    we must choose wisely, may God help us
    it’s a matter of time, this too shall pass.

  114. Great writing. Thanks very much.
    Biology very much determines how the human mind works. Talents always have a biological basis. Of course, the mind also controls biology but that is secondary.
    I recommend the author to read Heiz Kohut’s Self Psychology. I think Kohut has masterfully solved this body-mind dilemma. The mind cannot exist independently without the body but as long as the body lives it can function independently without being a prisoner of the body.

  115. @SMK

    Brain by itself is just a heap of flesh and bones..

    But Doctores do also not know what “live” is,
    what makes merry go round.


    Do you breath?
    Who breathes?
    Stop breathing…
    Can you stop breathing?
    Is it breathing you?

    Yogis can play all sorts of games but not forever.

    “”Soul” is a fantasy”:

    Are you not ensouled?
    Do you not have a soul?
    No “soul life”?
    No “Life of the Soul”?

    What did or do the natives say?
    Did they not predict the current state hundreds of years ago?
    Was that just a “mind”, a brainy opinion?

    What is live, aliveness?

    What makes the heart beat?
    What makes the blood circulate?
    Why does the embryos heart start to beat next weak,
    if it could physically already beat today?
    Where does the heartbeat come from?
    Why do many Americans insist that abortion is prohibited as soon as there is a heartbeat?

    When you are making love…are you only mindfucking?
    If you are making love and hopefully a light, bright, white baby is resulting,
    would you call it a mindfuck or a soul living up (in human flesh)?
    Could it be the lovers love manifested in flesh?
    “The child, the living witness of the love between father and mother”.
    “The love come alive”.

    Beat, weak beat, no beat – dead.

    Soul: Spirit, spirited, lively, vivid; viva (amore).
    Life, conscious, less conscious, unconscious;
    Breath, little breath, no breath – dead.

    Mind is very real and some minds are very powerful, usually harmful…
    There are “strong minds”… There are weaker minds…
    Mind is a conglomerate and not just “the brain”.
    Why can people without brain still live?

    What about animals without a human brain?

    Mind is a conglomerate of what?
    Where is your mind when you sleep?
    Do you have no brain when you sleep?

    What makes the brain function?

    Soul brings the body to live.
    When soul leaves, the body dies
    and with it the mind con(glomerate).

    “The Mind”, the mental is
    Intellect, Intelligence, intelligent, more brain(y) and less
    Infantiles, less developed, more developed, ancients;
    Sentiments, sets, set ups; „money makes intelligent“.
    Moods, Emotions, emotionalised;

    German has no word for “mind” on the occupied surface.

    The title, the heading for “mind” is “Gemüt”, (for whoever might be interested if not you).

    Ge-Müt; Ge is approaching “going”; müt can be approached with Mut (courage) and Mühe (effort).

    A caption of Gemüt is the conglomerate of the following

    Intellect, Intelligence, intelligent, more brain(y) and less
    Infantiles, less developed, more developed, ancients; the think er;
    Er(r) thinks and sinks and stinks or rises;
    Sentiments, sets, set ups;
    „Money makes intelligent“.
    Moods, Emotions, emotionalised;

    That is a conglomerate of Gemüt and might be comparable to your word “mind”.

    My Gemüt, running on a drop of soul, responded herewith to your response to mine.
    With the drop of soul behind the stage it came out in love for true man (with wo-man “all inclusive”),
    just like my Gemüt gets jumpy and even aggressive with liars, cheats, psychos and manipulators, who have no real interest in truth, but are only interested in domination; being on top of it and nothing coming of it.

    All the best to you, to any man and any woman interested in truth
    and learning to discriminate.

    Now I have got to work again and shall come back tomorrow – if there is still a heart beating then.
    Ah, let me stop my heartbeat till tomorrow…

  116. SMK says: • Website
    @Franklin Ryckaert

    I submit they’re either lying or hallucinating, since mind-body dualism, Cartesian dualism, belief in a “soul” or “ghost in the machine” or disembodied mind, is a fantasy.

    • Replies: @Kurt Knispel
  117. apollonian says: • Website

    Nancy Plays Too Clever

    We Christians worship truth (= Christ) which indicates the objective reality (Aristotle), necessary criterion for truth–we reject subjectivism/Satanism. Of course metaphysics (first principles) can’t be proven in logic–objectivity or subjectivism are assumptions. But subjectivism (hence Satanism) reduces to absurd too easily.

    Hence it’s not mere matter of making sense to me or us (subjectivism)–it must make sense, period–in same way as any scientific proposition, thus following and consistent with the objective assumption. So get a life, “Nancy,” and quit playing dumb.

    • Replies: @Nancy
  118. SMK says: • Website

    I did “solve” or explain it in my comments, in some detail and at some length, and won’t repeat myself.

    A person’s brain is so damaged that they have no mind or self-consciousness. Then, when he/she dies, according to Christianity, his/her mind is restored as a “soul” that ascends to heaven or descends to hell for eternity, depending on whether or not one believes that Jesus was/is the “son of God” who was born of a virgin and resurrecdted after his death by crucifixiion, to do what exactly, to experience what exactly?

    Where was this soul and mind with no body when his/her brain was so damaged that he/she didn’t have a mind or self-consciousness?

  119. HenryB says:

    The Jew gave you your absent God and effete religion for a purpose. What is that pupose? The Jewish Encyclopedia makes it clear…..


    Ethics of Christianity and Buddhism.

    In this sense both the ethics of Christianity and Buddhism were at one and the same time egoistic and altruistic. Self-obliteration in this life assures self-realization in the other. Self-realization being, according to Buddhism, the mother of all evil, self-obliteration is the road to permanent happiness. Buddhistic as well as Christian Altruism are thus founded on other-worldliness, which in the Christian scheme flowers in the assurance of personal felicity in a higher state, whereas in that of Buddhism it promises release from all evil of self-existence in the blissful and happy Nirvana


    Papa, You are proselytizing for a suicide cult. Stop it.

    • Replies: @Seraphim
  120. @Peter D. Bredon

    And you sound like a relic from the counter-culture, the sort found moldering in backrooms of institutions, who still thinks that “if we just try hard enough, even if we swim against reality, we’re sure to succeed.”

    Francis is the sort who’ll make the Church openly comfortable for pederasts but will eliminate the problem by no longer defining it as such, in that bureaucratic way Marxists and other leftoids like to do.

    But Francis’s handlers, right now, are happier than a dog with two dicks: if Francis succeeds at creating a schism, Francis and they win; if Francis fails to create a schism, Francis loses but succeeds at discrediting the Papacy, and so they still win.

    (I hope Francis realizes what a patsy he’s being played for before the timer runs out.)

  121. Seraphim says:

    The ‘West’ committed suicide when ‘Zarathustra’ proclaimed that ‘God is dead’.

    • Replies: @HenryB
    , @UR2
  122. anonymous[117] • Disclaimer says:
    @The Germ Theory of Disease

    INDEED….Judaism/Rabbis are always talking about the divine priestly exclusive CHOSEN role of Jews in the World …Tikum Olam??? BUT JEWS are the leaders (often creators) of Slavery, ponography, sex trafficking, arms trafficking, WARS, financial Debacles, …jews promote ABORTIONS, gay marriage, lgbt/same toilets laws, eugencis/Euthansia, …but you are right Jewish books argue that Child rape is Ok IF and only IF a jew rapes a goyim child…those policies can NOT come from GOD (chosen)….those are EVIL policies…Jews may lie, steal, deceive, KILL as long as the victims are goyim…is that divine, virtous??? and Rabbis NEVER critize, denounce, admosnish such EVIL behavior..why not? Is GOD ok with that??? A poor African old lady dying of HIV the last face they will see is the face of a CHRISTIAN missionary, Catholic priests…RABBIS do not believe in tending to the POOR??? vulnerable? hungry, sick, in this world??…

  123. HenryB says:

    Like 99.999999999% of the people in the West had (or still have) a fuckin’ clue who you are talking about.

  124. Fr. John says:

    I’m a university professor, and a cleric. By nature, I don’t DO soundbytes. I appeal to the intellect, not the short term smartphone idiots.

    Is my audience smaller because of that? Ye…but you read the post;

    so I’m happy to note that even someone like you is able to digest thoughts larger than a sentence.

  125. Gapeseed says:

    Uncanny is the right word. Critics of St. Paul point to his saying that salvation is from the Jews, thinking perhaps that Paul established a hierarchy where Christians were to be subservient. Perhaps, instead, he was hinting at the great melodrama to be played out where Christians were to struggle against Jews in a spiritual battle leading, in their own paths, to salvation for both.

    • Replies: @Seraphim
    , @apollonian
  126. Seraphim says:

    It was not Saint Paul who said that ‘salvation is from the Jews’, but the Christ Himself to the Samaritan woman:
    ”Jesus saith unto her, Woman, believe me, the hour cometh, when ye shall neither in this mountain, nor yet at Jerusalem, worship the Father. Ye worship ye know not what: we know what we worship: for salvation [ἡ σωτηρία] is from/out of the Jews [exactly from among the Jews]. But the hour cometh, and now is, when the true worshippers shall worship the Father in spirit and in truth: for the Father seeketh such to worship him. God is a Spirit: and they that worship him must worship him in spirit and in truth.” (John 4:21-24).
    Saint Paul said: ”For I would not, brethren, that ye should be ignorant of this mystery, lest ye should be wise in your own conceits; that blindness in part is happened to Israel, until the fulness of the Gentiles be come in. And so all Israel shall be saved: as it is written: ‘There shall come out of Sion the Deliverer [ὁ ρυόμενος], and shall turn away ungodliness from Jacob; For this is my covenant unto them, when I shall take away their sins”’ (Romans 11:25-27). St.Paul quotes Isaiah.
    So, Salvation and Deliverer is the same person: Jesus Christ, the Saviour. What St. Paul really says (in other places as well) is that ”my heart’s desire and prayer to God for Israel is that they may be saved”. But only is they believe in Christ.

    • Replies: @Gapeseed
  127. apollonian says: • Website

    Once Again: “Jews” Are NOT Same As Judeans, Israelites

    Salvation is certainly NOT NOT NOT fm “Jews,” “Jews” defined as followers of Pharisees (and nowadays followers of Talmud), trying to take advantage of equivocation fallacy. The original quote most probably refers to Judeans who were simply descendents of Israelites who lived in Roman province of Judea at the time, only a small percentage of whom–probably around 5%–were followers of Pharisees, a middle-class party and/or sect of the time.

    Don’t forget Jews (Talmudists) gloat that they had Christ killed (as in their Talmud), and this is confirmed in New Test., Gosp. MATT 27:25 where the people, instigated by Pharisees, told Pontius Pilate, the Roman Gov., that soon-to-be-executed Christ’s “blood be upon us and our children.”

    Jews like Unz LOVE to throw this sort of dis-info among the stupid goyim to keeping them confused, pretending Jews and Judeans are same thing, that Jews, the followers of Pharisees, deserve any respect at all for the “salvation” mentioned and discussed by Christ and Christians.

    We see, further there’s been significant drop-off/reduction of comments for this blog this day–the day after it was featured w. top billing–due no doubt, to Unz’s furious and intensive censorship, Unz practicing his usual deflection and manipulation of the blog discussions. It would be interesting and enlightening to see the actual ratio of comments that get approved and published against the total comments that were submitted then deleted and censored by Unz.

    U poor fools who imagine Unz is for free speech for goyim are just pathetically mis-conceived as to who and what Jews are–they’re Satanists who do the devil’s work against humanity. And I’m sure Unz comforts his fellow Jews who so much complain to him as to just how he works to subvert the discussion of the goyim on these blogs.

    • Replies: @Gapeseed
  128. Gapeseed says:

    Always appreciate your comments, Seraphim.

    • Thanks: Seraphim
  129. Gapeseed says:

    I’m only an occasional commentator here and my command of theology is splotchy, so I appreciate your comment. But I must ask you and the readers here: does Mr. Unz really engage in the widespread censorship you allege? It seems that the conversation might be too esoteric to attract the same interest as, say, a discussion on the causes of Covid or 9/11, which would suppress the number of posts relative to those topics of more general interest. Given the scope and heat of some of the comments on the site, I am not convinced he does.

  130. Seraphim says:

    The disinformation is that Jews are something different from Judaeans. This is BS and one cannot but wonder why people continue to peddle so ferociously this non-sense.
    It is also an anachronism to talk about ‘talmudists’ before the compilation of the Talmud in the 4th century AD.

  131. UR2 says:

    Zarathustra never pronounced ‘God is dead’; Nietzsche put the words in his mouth; thereby proving to the world what a dishonest, arrogant, ignorant, mentally disturbed young man he was. A gift to the Jews to pick up on, publish and distribute his attack on all good. His outrage, -thus spake zarathustra-, was calumny of a holy man, Zoroaster, who believed in good, truth, justice and love: not – will to power-. This great religous leader of ancient times taught one supreme, universal God to create, help and love man. What do we get nowdays but -the transvaluation of all values- ie. lies and deception

  132. Seraphim says:

    Of course he didn’t ‘spake’ it. It was a metaphor for ‘Nitzscheanism’. But it was not Nietzsche who invented it either. He formulated it more poignantly, before he wrote ‘Also sprach Zarathustra’: ”God is dead. God remains dead. And we have killed him. How shall we comfort ourselves, the murderers of all murderers? What was holiest and mightiest of all that the world has yet owned has bled to death under our knives: who will wipe this blood off us? What water is there for us to clean ourselves? What festivals of atonement, what sacred games shall we have to invent? Is not the greatness of this deed too great for us? Must we ourselves not become gods simply to appear worthy of it?” (in the ‘Gay Science’). His anguish arose from his denial (and all his predecessors’, those who effectively killed God) of the Resurrection and his demented hatred of Christianity. Deep down he knew that the Judgment will come, but he defiantly proclaimed himself the ‘Antichrist’.

  133. @SMK

    Brain is not able from itself alone to set a member or organ of your body in activity.
    Neither am I able of myself alone to raise the body, to raise its hands or to produce a sound with its speech instruments. Both your own setup and I need a power current for this. Like the machine operator needs the power current of steam or electricity to get the machine going. If the power current is missing or too weak, the machine stands still.
    In our case, the machinist is (usually) the mindset. The machine is the body or the matter.
    If the matter is to be set in motion by the spirit or spirited or inspired brain, a power current is necessary for it. This power current is live (the live under the hood). In man it is called ‘soul’, in contrast to ‘spirit’ as part of an individual mind (construct) and ‘body’.
    Man consists of body, soul and mind (incl. spirit).

    Quantum physicists too have discovered soul (unwittingly?) and some are in awe…
    („Soul“ is apparently weighing ca. 5 gramm in an ensouled body.)

    Some of thoses physic essays are in the www and anyone who is interested in SOUL shall find.

    You are not really the body. It dies. You are not really the mind. It dies with the body (but usually leaves a fragrant on the soul bit).
    If you can read the above, you are alive, you are ensouled.
    Wether you agree or disagree depends on your mindset; a set consists of intellect, feelings etc.
    The set(up) does not really matter either at the end of the day.
    Unfortunately the end of the day is usually not reached when the body dies (because most soul bits have to march on). Only very few Lucky Lukes are done and finish with a last death.

    God Luck to you.

  134. Nancy says:

    And one more time…. ‘Aye, aye, Cap’n!’

  135. Nancy says:

    ” ‘might’ just be” … or might just not be…… a personal call, IMO.

  136. Seraphim says:
    @Peter D. Bredon

    If you want to suggest that Jacques Maritain was ‘gay’, you are wrong. People tend to forget (if they ever knew) that Maritain was born and raised a huguenot. He converted to Catholicism together with his wife Raissa Oumansoff, Jewish Russian immigrant, born and raised in the ‘Jewish faith’ but fashionable atheist, under the influence of the writer Leon Bloy, a fervent Catholic, but a fervent anti-anti-Semite also. Paradoxically (as some biographers put it) ”Bloy gave back to her the Jewish faith of her childhood, now brought to completion in the New Covenant in Christs blood”. She collaborated closely with her husband in shaping his philosophy, principally dedicated to ”furnishing the intellectual basis for concrete transformations to how Catholicism thought and taught about Jews and Judaism”.
    Jacques Maritain summarized his efforts in few words: “I am not a Jew. I regret it, because it is a great privilege to belong to the same race as Jesus Christ and the Holy Virgin.”

  137. @Tom Verso

    Looks like you kinda missed this article

    posted here last month.

    In his concluding paragraph Jones masterfully condenses the entire JQ problem to its basic essence while patently implying its necessary and only possible solution:

    The Church, as I have said, many times before, can have unity or she can have good relations with the Jews, but she can’t have both. For the past 60 years, the hierarchy has chosen good relations with the Jews, with disastrous consequences for Church unity. Traditionis Custodes rightly points out the lack of unity in the Church today, but ascribes that lack of unity to a symptom, the Latin Mass, and not the cause, which is the all-but-universal refusal to preach the gospel as it applies to the Jews. Traditionis Custodes makes this point when it mentions the importance of the lex orandi, but it fails to trace the disastrous consequences of this manipulation of the lex orandi back to its source in embarrassment at the anti-Jewish gospel which is the fons et origo of the liturgy and the source of our current disunity.

    Also, if said article is read thoroughly to comprehension, which as the author here correctly points out with regard to any EMJ piece is work, the Jew-lie of this SPLC screeching becomes evident:

    “These are not the Latin Mass traditionalists,” Mr. Potok continued, referring to me and John Sharpe of IHS press. “These are the people who reject Vatican II reforms. They are out of [actor Mel Gibson’s father] Hutton Gibson’s world, in saying that the Jews are destroying the world.”

    Vaatican II did nothing to reform Church Doctrine on the Jews. All the teachings of Thomas Aquinas, John Chrysostom, as well as the insightful and prescient writings of Rev. Georg Ratzinger quoted by EMJ extensively in that article, remained undiminished by Vatican II.

    Vatican II did not change Church truth on Jews. But by typical Jew slight-of-hand the infiltrators were able to get the Latin language of Holy Mass with its mention of Jew perfidy replaced by local vernacular wherein mention of Jews was omitted instead of translated.

  138. @omegabooks


    Jews hate whitey for being the descendent of Christendom. Jews seek white genocide out of desperate desire to preclude the rekindling of Christendom wherever whites reside.

    Yes, if (((they))) were to succeed at genociding whites non-white Christians would become the new target. But Jews love (((their))) Protestant Reformation so only the possibility of whites returning to the Catholicism of Christendom drives the current Jewish genocidal fury.

    Talmudic Judaism is diabolical, i.e., Satan worship. John 8:44.

    The usury monster is properly mentioned here. Jesus declared the end of usury in his first recorded public statement at Luke 4:16-30, the most under comprehended portion of The Gospel. A reading of Michael Hudson’s book

    eliminates half the ignorance as to those verses. The unsurpassed comment maker here

    provides massive help toward understanding this.

  139. @Anonymous

    Thank you for quoting this important insight from Ron Unz:

    …according to the Jewish Talmud, Jesus is perhaps the vilest being who ever lived, condemned to spend eternity in the bottommost pit of Hell, immersed in a boiling vat of excrement.

    Jews’ unceasing murderous hatred for Jesus and His flock is all due to His reading of Isaiah 61 and subsequent statement applying it to usury Jews always seek to impose on the goyim as permitted by the Talmud in violation of Mosaic Law described in Luke 4:16-30.

  140. I pray that you and Anglin come to the Church. God is assembling His Army.

  141. Rocha says:
    @A Half Naked Fakir

    The greatest race that ever lived? That killed and destroyed people of the same race as patsies of the usurers?
    The Anglo-saxon WASPS fire bombed innocent German citizens at the behest of the money changers; went to war with Dutch Protestants at the behest of the money chamgers; are bombing innocent civilians in the Middle East at the behest of the money changers etc
    The Protestant Reformation resulted in the legalisation of usury, the privatization of the issue of the currency and the establishment of the debt based financial system which has allowed the usurers to accumulate so much wealth that they can impose their NWO; capitalism, communism, fascism, socialism , two world war and various genocides
    The USA and UK have been responsible for more wars for their masters the bankers than any other race or nation. And think you are superior? You are the barbarians!

  142. @Rocha

    JWO: Jew World Order

    Your comment is otherwise accurate and much appreciated.

    Sad how the descendants of Christendom have been deceived by (((The Usurers’))) Judaizing heresy Protestantism into acting as powerful golem for Jews.

  143. @Tom Verso

    … E. M. Jones conveniently ignore[s] the Society of Saint Pius X and its 900+ priests worldwide who stand de facto against the post-Vatican II Jewish Catholic Church.

    You have precisely articulated Jones’s gravest failing, a failing that undercuts the ultimate value of his analysis of the JQ. His work as a diagnostician is truly remarkable, but his open embrace of Conciliarism and undisguised hostility to Traditionalism are the sources of most of the jaw-dropping bêtises that litter his books, articles, and speeches. These are not incidental matters. His acute powers of diagnosis are rendered nugatory so long as the cure he proposes—namely, the corrupted faith of conciliarism—is even more poisonous in the spiritual realm than the covid vaxxes are in the corporeal.

    To cite perhaps the most obvious and important example, no preconciliar Catholic, in common with today’s Traditional Catholics, would ever have dismissed the central importance of race and ethnicity as Jones insists on doing. Indeed, it is only since the subversion of the Faith wrought by the Second Vatican Council that “official Catholic” attitudes toward the Jews, which formerly ranged from grudging but suspicious tolerance out to full recognition of their unmitigable hatred of the Cross, have gotten rebuilt on the concept of the Jews’ being Christians’ [ahem] elder brothers in supernatural faith. If Jones has ever dismissed the “elder brothers” obscenity with the contempt it merits, it will come as news to me.

    • Replies: @Anon
  144. Anon[254] • Disclaimer says:
    @Pierre de Craon

    “ . If Jones has ever dismissed the “elder brothers” obscenity with the contempt it merits, it will come as news to me.”

    Indeed he has, lately by re-publishing La Civiltá Catolica’s articles on the JQ as well as on the specific historical jewish persecution and difamation of the Church and Christians since St Stephen. The Fathers already called it “an ancient fury”.

    On your other point.. infiltrated or not.. Francis or not.. Extra ecclesia nulla salus. The papacy is the principle of unity, from such a principle can Christian civilization be brought forth anew. Lefebvre may have been a momentary instrument of God, but the Lord of History himself instituted his Church in clear teaching to his disciples. (Peter’s profession of Faith is the rock, as you know) Lefebvre’s movement eventually split up, as have all renegade Church movements built on a man’s will.

    Jones understands the principle of unity and the sin of scandal. He builds on the positives (the Faith itself) since he cannot preach on the wonders of the present clergy, and knows better than to cause (more) scandal.

    • Replies: @Pierre de Craon
  145. @Anon

    Thank you for the reminder about Civiltà cattolica. Jones’s reassertion of it is, of course, important as far as it goes. His refusal to explicitly repudiate the council’s “doctrinal updatings,” however, indicates that he is still hedging his bets.

    As to your interpretation of the present-day conciliar church, I do not agree with a word of it. What you dismissively term “Lefebvre’s movement” is Roman Catholicism stricto sensu. The pope is still pope, yes—and none except sedevacantists deny it—but the primary function of Francis and all his conciliar predecessors (save John Paul I, who didn’t reign long enough to do harm or good) has been to lead the “renegade movement” in defiance of Faith and Tradition.

    To assert, as you do, the demands of Authority as paramount when those who wield the highest authority in the Church’s temporal structure are requiring you to reimagine or distort or sabotage the Faith handed down once and for all time by the Apostles is to compromise both necessarily unchangeable Faith and rightly understood Authority.

    • Replies: @Anon
  146. Anon[254] • Disclaimer says:
    @Pierre de Craon

    Sorry for the late reply. I did not mean to be dismissive about Lefebvre, I just look at him as at any other historical figure. I tend to believe part of his legacy was providential (even with a capital P), part human error.

    You know as well as I that catholicism strictu senso includes unity. After all, the four Church attributes are One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic. Going outside is a mistake, for where else is He present? Where else to find the grace to live a higher and sacramental life?

    I have seen, unfortunately, several truly devout persons realize the homoheresy now in power. They have been shocked and fallen away, and are now adrift between veganism and God knows what else. Mind you, they still retain some good habits, and pray. Yet something changed. It makes me think about Pascal’s saying that there are three paths to Faith: by inspiration, by reason and by habit, as happens to devout cradle Catholics. These last really suffer because of the … sin of scandal.

    The Faith is beyond Francis’ or any single man’s power to destroy. Remember Chesterton’s witticism about the Faith having five time gone to the dogs, and every time the dogs died. Those past dogs are no doubt regretting they did not get a millstone around their necks. The current ones also will. Francis and those that preceded him are simply the cross of our times.

    You know what He said about crosses. Quo vadis, Pierre?

Current Commenter

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone

 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Edmund Connelly Comments via RSS
Becker update V1.3.2
The Surprising Elements of Talmudic Judaism
The Shaping Event of Our Modern World