The Unz Review: An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 NOI Research Group Archive
"Jews Selling Blacks" Book Stirs Reparations Movement
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

It was inevitable that the Black Reparations debate would ultimately shine a spotlight on those who profited the most from the 500-year destruction of Black civilization. The selective banning by Amazon of the Nation of Islam’s The Secret Relationship Between Blacks and Jews book series was a clear indication of how skittish Jews have become about their exposure as major beneficiaries of the trans-Atlantic slave trade. And even as Jewish leaders move to cut off campus access to strong Black voices of Reparations, their own Jewish scholars continue to supply damning evidence of the Jewish role in Black slavery.

Dr. Harold Brackman wrote, “Jews were about twice as likely to be slave owners as the average white Southerner.” Rabbi Dr. Marc Lee Raphael, the longtime editor of the most prestigious of Jewish historical journals, the Publications of the American Jewish Historical Society, wrote of the slave trade that “in all the American colonies, whether French, British, or Dutch, Jewish merchants frequently dominated.” Jewish Encyclopedia: “[T]he cotton-plantations in many parts of the South were wholly in the hands of the Jews…” Dr. Michael R. Cohen wrote in his 2017 book Cotton Capitalists, that “Jews clustered in the cotton industry, and…became deeply enmeshed in the nation’s—and perhaps the world’s—most important industry.” A soon to be released book by Arizona State University professor Stanley Mirvis will confirm that Jamaican Jews were slave owners and dealers in alarming numbers.

And Blacks, “in alarming numbers,” are becoming more and more aware of this meticulously shrouded part of Black Holocaust history. Part of that awakening is due to the Nation of Islam’s 144-page book with the unambiguous title Jews Selling Blacks: Slave-Sale Advertising By American Jews. It is the largest collection ever published of the actual ads Jews placed in American newspapers for the sale of Black human beings. And it has proven to be the most dangerous to the mythology that upholds the fraudulent “Black–Jewish alliance.” It amounts to 144 pages of direct confessions of the most horrific racial crimes from the Jewish slave-dealers themselves!

In 2010, the Hon. Min. Louis Farrakhan was asked why he released the book, and he replied: “Anyone who reads the real truth of what has been done to us would be shocked at first by that knowledge. But it is something we must know in order that we will make sure that what our parents, grandparents and great grandparents suffered, we will never let it happen again.”

Jewish merchants from all over the world participated in the inhumane trade in Black human beings, often dominating some of the most important slave-trading markets. For instance, nine out of ten enslaved Africans were shipped to Brazil’s sugar plantations, where the Jewish presence was described by Dr. Arnold Wiznitzer:

“Besides their important position in the sugar industry…they dominated the slave trade….The buyers who appeared at the auctions were almost always Jews, and because of this lack of competitors they could buy slaves at low prices.”

Jews deny they dominated and monopolized the slave trade and use U.S. census records to diminish the role of Jews as major “owners” of Black human beings. This, however, is highly misleading. Not only were Jews twice as likely as the general population of American whites to own Africans—with many Jews having one or two slaves in their homes as domestics—but they were simultaneously retailing dozens, even hundreds of Africans at a time through their business enterprises. The 1830 census shows that all the Jews of Charleston, South Carolina, claimed to “own” a total of 104 Black human beings. But a single Charleston Jew, Jacob Cohen, on a single day in 1857, offered for sale “125 rice negroes”! That same year, the same Mr. Cohen teamed with a Gentile and advertised to sell almost twice that number—210—in a single day. As Jewish scholar Jonathan Schorsch wrote, “Jewish merchants routinely possessed enormous numbers of slaves temporarily before selling them off.” And none of those fiendish transactions are registered in the U.S. census. Today, for example, the family that owns Home Depot may have 1 or 2 refrigerators in their home, even as their stores and warehouses may have hundreds of thousands.

Jews are most implicated in slavery by their marketing of the products of slave labor such as cotton, tobacco, sugar, and rice; their supplying plantations with items of commerce and credit; and their buying and selling whole plantations along with the slaves. Jews—like Cohen & Alexander, Cohen & Moses, and Lewis B. Levy—are found serving the plantation slave masters: they are selling “negro jackets,” “negro shoes,” “negro clothes” and one A. Tobias is selling 7 bales of “American cloth for plantation Negroes.”

The language used in the slave advertisements by Jewish merchants reveals their total comfort with the horrors of Black slavery. Many of them, such as Rabbi Israel I. Jones and Rabbi Jacob Levin, actually served as high synagogue officials and pillars of the Jewish community. Rabbi Levin sold “22 likely Negroes” for “investment” purposes, he states in his ad. David Franks used terms like “Cargoes” of “Likely Negroes,” which were bought and sold alongside farm animals and furniture; shipping services are offered with “roomy accommodations for slaves”; insurance is offered for slave ships; “negro” and “mulatto” “wenches” are put on the auction block as “temptresses”—all these “bargains” publicly offered in paid ads by Jews in America’s city newspapers.

Whole “gangs of negroes”—some advertised “in families”—are publicly traded for pure profit. The image of an ad by Jacob Cohen & Son on the book’s front cover is a perverse example of a JEWISH FAMILY selling a BLACK FAMILY!

One Leah Minis has “Sundry Negro Slaves in families.” Jacob Cohen & Co. sells a plantation with a “gang of 60 Negroes, accustomed to the culture of cotton.” Abraham Cohen sells an estate “consisting of excellent field slaves.” He sells another property “consisting of some as prime negroes as any in the state, among whom are carpenters, sawyers, coopers, wheelwrights, and valuable house servants.” To be sold in an “estate sale” at the offices of Jacob Cohen & Son: “210 Negroes,” among which are “valuable carpenters, millwrights, engineers, coopers, mill hands, blacksmiths, boat hands and house servants.” Jacob De Leon sells “25 Africans,” consisting of “men, women, boys and girls.” Children 5-years-old, 9-years-old, 11, 16, 17, 2-months-old—even infants—are all sold without a trace of Jewish scruples. One advertises a “valuable family of field slaves,” including an “infant” and a “2-year old” (both of whom the Jewish dealer already determined to be “field slaves”).

A. Seixas, “broker,” offered a special deal to sellers: he would not charge for the temporary lodging of “sucking children of negroes sent to [him to] sell.” In another ad Seixas actually uses poetry to attract buyers in which he guarantees that his Black products will “work the rice, Or bring them to the lash.” Levy Jacobs offered 100 “prime Virginia slaves,” but later had to take out an ad to rebut rumors that he was instead fraudulently selling “Kentucky slaves.”

Freedom-seeking self-emancipated Blacks are branded “runaways” and doggedly pursued through newspaper notices: Nathan Hart chased a Black woman for years, advertising for the return of “my negro girl” when she was 25 and again when she was 31. Other Jews captured and held “runaways” for the bounty. The #MeToo and Women’s March movements should be aware that at least 24 of these Jewish men advertised Black women and girls as “WENCHES.”

The Jewish slave-dealers distinguish whether their Black human chattel are “colored” or “mulatto,” foreign-born Africans or native-born “negroes,” and much of this Black merchandise is “warranted” “sober and honest,” “of good character,” and documented as having made no attempts to run away. One group of Blacks “for sale” is advertised—like an automobile—to have had just one previous owner. A Jewish slave-broker offered special payment terms for “negroes” like furniture—payable in one year. Jews Selling Black slaves on layaway! Long before the Nazis forced Jews to wear yellow stars, Jewish police in America required that Blacks have “slave badges.” Isaac Barrett seeking his “runaway negro wench” informs the public in an ad that she had badge #2090, proving that she was his property.

Reparations—as with the “reparations” the Israelis continue to receive for the crimes of Nazis—will ultimately be made to the descendants of the Black victims of this 500-year human tragedy by those who profited from such untold misery. The Jews who scream “anti-Semitism” at every mention of their racist past are merely standing up for their ancestors who bought and sold human beings without a trace of mercy. These are the historical “hate crimes” that made Jews the wealthiest of all American whites. What the ADLs and the SPLCs can never stomach is that The Honorable Minister Louis Farrakhan, our Champion, stands for all those sold as mere merchandise in those Jewish advertisements—the “wenches,” the “field negroes,” the “prime, choice negroes,” the “sucking children,” the “runaways”—to at last bring them Justice.


On February 26, 2019, the Anti-Defamation League forced Amazon.com to ban The Secret Relationship Between Blacks & Jews book series. It can be purchased here: https://store.finalcall.com/collections/the-secret-relationship-between-blacks-and-jews

(Republished from NOI Research Group by permission of author or representative)
 
• Category: History • Tags: ADL, American Media, Blacks, Jews, Slavery 
Hide 261 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. Rational says:

    JUDAISTS STILL TRAFFICKING IN HUMANS—NOW USING JETS, NOT SHIPS.

    Thanks for the excellent ariticle, Sir. Sounds like a great book. We need more books like this that expose the rackets the Judaists have been running for centuries, exploiting and exterminating the goyim.

    We should all seek reparations from the Judaists—blacks for the slave trade, whites for 100M dead in WW2, USA and Europe turned into 3rd world by global human trafficking and the great replacement from the 3rd world, the new Jewish slave trade of cheap labor, now being done with jet planes.

    3rd world immigration by the Judaists has pushed blacks down further, made them 3rd class citizens in USA, as aliens take away their jobs and other opportunities. Blacks need to wake up and realize that we all are being exploited by the Judaists.

    • Agree: Crazy Horse
  2. I´d be slightly more impressed by the scientific rigor if it weren´t about gibs again 😀

    • Replies: @anarchyst
  3. anarchyst says:
    @nokangaroos

    The “gibs” from jews to blacks would give the jews a taste of their own medicine.

    Bring it on…

    • Replies: @anon_382
  4. Wally says:

    – Let’s not forget about black scholar Dr. Tony Martin whose research confirmed who the prime sellers & owners of slaves really were, Jews.
    recommended:
    Dr. Tony Martin – The Jewish Role in the African Slave Trade
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=067Y8tRwZyo
    more:
    Jews and the Slave Trade:
    http://wethoughttheywerewhite.weebly.com/jews–the-slave-trade.html

    – author/s said:
    “Reparations—as with the “reparations” the Israelis continue to receive for the crimes of Nazis”
    – correction, alleged crimes

    • Replies: @Eonic
    , @SaneClownPosse
  5. Anon[186] • Disclaimer says:

    I seem to recall a soft cover book “Negro and Jew” that I noticed on the desk of the Jewish Student advisor at Brandeis in 1972. It was a small soft cover book with a Black and White book cover with bold “Negro and Jew” Title printed on the cover. I believe it was printed in 1967. I recall him picking up the book and opening to a page where it stated that “Blacks sucked Anti-Semitism from their mother’s breasts”. He went on to state that Blacks were Anti-Semites. Blacks had an irrational Hate for the Jews in the light of the fact that Jews fought for Black rights when no one else did. I have tried to locate a copy of the book without much no success.

  6. Many jews seem to the most vociferous about ending “whiteness” and “white privilege” and this is going to backfire immensely. They must think that POC are stupid because how long can they preach “white privilege” at the top of their lungs only to have POC doing a little audit and discover that many of those at the top getting all the grift are not just white but Jewish?

    • Replies: @SunBakedSuburb
  7. anon[119] • Disclaimer says:

    Could you perhaps make your books more available to the retail services that still sell them? I just went to an online book store and there are huge numbers of customers listed as “interested” in these various works but there are none in stock. More people would buy them if they thought they could get them through a non-controversial retailer.

  8. Not to mention their role in white indentured servitude…same ship owners if you know what I mean (Michael Hoffman’s “They Were White and They Were Slaves”…first sent to Caribbean where they couldn’t handle the heat and were worked to death, so then they started bringing over Africans, who could handle the heat.)

    When the you-know-whos start acknowledging this, let me know. ‘Cos I’m not paying any reparations, not one penny! Former Senator Jim Webb or Virginia verified in his book “Born Fighting” that most ofthe indentured servants were Irish or Scots-Irish, which is where half of my lineage comes from (the other half in German).

  9. It was inevitable that the Black Reparations debate would ultimately shine a spotlight on those who profited the most from the 500-year destruction of Black civilization.

    Actually, blacks were brought to civilization by way of Western slavery(by whites and Jews). Without it, blacks would all be running around half naked, chucking spears, and beating on bongo drums.

    But then, ALL PEOPLES were brought to civilization through slavery and serfdom. There had to be ORDER before FREEDOM. People didn’t freely give up savagery or barbarism. It was beaten out of them by ‘tyranny’. And in order for blacks to be brought to civilization, they had to be slaves first. They were just going through a historical process that whites, browns, and yellows underwent before they came to civilization. Only in modern times did civilization come to be synonymous with freedom. For most of history, civilization was about ‘tyranny’ and control to create order over vast populations. And slavery and serfdom were effective means to make large swaths of people to obey and serve the system.

    • Agree: Pheasant
  10. @Anon

    Available at Alibris for a buck, or on Amazon for $851.

    Thank you for the comment, I ordered a copy.

    https://m.alibris.com/Negro-and-Jew-an-encounter-in-America-Shlomo-Katz/book/4611423

  11. renfro says:

    ”Publications of the American Jewish Historical Society, wrote of the slave trade that “in all the American colonies, whether French, British, or Dutch, Jewish merchants frequently dominated.” Jewish Encyclopedia: “[T]he cotton-plantations in many parts of the South were wholly in the hands of the Jews…” Dr. Michael R. Cohen wrote in his 2017 book Cotton Capitalists, that “Jews clustered in the cotton industry, and…became deeply enmeshed in the nation’s—and perhaps the world’s—most important industry”

    Since I am a history buff on the South, my own home ground, let me correct a few things. The main slave trading ports in the South stretched from New Bern NC to Wilmington NC to Charleston SC to Savannah Ga…slaves were also taken to inland auctions,one of largest being in Fayetteville NC where the one of the largest slave auction open air buildings still stands in the middle of down town.
    At the advent of the Civil War there were 55 plantations of varying sizes in NC, none owned by Jews. The Jews were the ‘brokers’ who had originally come representing buyers in England and other countries. That is how some Jews settled in the South, mainly in SC and became independent buyers and sellers , especially in Charleston which already had a small group of settled Jews. It was Spanish ships run by Spanish Jews who brought most of the slaves to the South as well as to other colonies in Jamaica and Brazil. The majority of the slaves were from West Africa. The ships would drop some slaves for auction for Jamaica plantations and travel on to the southern coast to sell the bulk of the slaves. The Jews had become the natural slave traders because of their affiliation with the Spanish Jews.

    All the rest is history except for the fact the Jews never did stop preying on the blacks, letting them get into debt by over charging them at their stores and when they couldn’t pay off on time taking their small farms.

    There was little the blacks could do but the southern whites showed their opinion of the Jews behavior by ostracizing them from polite society ….well into the late 70’s Jews couldnt get a reservation at any of the gentile resorts like the famous Sea Island Ga…..or the golf resorts if their life depended on it …..if your name sounded even a bit Jewish there was nothing available for you.

    • Replies: @Pheasant
  12. To be fair, none of this demonstrates that Jews were especially bad.

    It merely suggests that they were not especially good

  13. dickr says:

    Reparations are coming, cannot be stopped. Will be humiliating for whites, and banks will profit again. Get it over and done with

  14. gibs till both median household incomes are equal

  15. @Rational

    You are correct.

    And two groups in particular are owed astonishing reparations by Judaists:
    a) Muslims
    b) Germans

    May justice be served, ASAP!

  16. Alfred says:

    When Egypt was totally under control of the British, Egypt’s Jews had a monopoly on exporting cotton to England. English Jews in Manchester bought the cotton and made cloth that was sold throughout the British Empire. Egyptians were not allowed to make their own cloth. They had to import it from Manchester. Egypt produced the finest quality fiber.

    In the above scenario, how difficult is it to imagine that the politicians of England were in the pocket of the Jews?

    Don’t forget that Benjamin Disraeli was the prime minister for much of the time.

    Cotton was an incredibly valuable commodity during much of the 19th century. Egyptian peasants were not much better off than the slaves of the Americas.

    My grandfather was the first person to be allowed to build a factory in Egypt – in the 1930’s. It was a paint factory and its products were used by the Allied armies in North Africa during WW2 – when Egypt was cut off from the UK. Much later, Anwar Sadat presented a posthumous medal to my father to commemorate this event. Anwar Sadat had been a lorry driver in the employee of a friend of my father at one time. 🙂

  17. gotmituns says:

    If slavery were reinstated, who in their right mind would buy a black? If someone did buy one, what type of actual work could they perform in this day and age?

    • LOL: TKK
  18. Eonic says:
    @Wally

    Your second link is out of date. Here is the current one: https://wethoughttheywerewhite.tumblr.com/JewsAndTheSlaveTrade

    • Replies: @Wally
  19. @gotmituns

    I’d like to hear a bit more about those “temptresses.”

    • Replies: @Curmudgeon
  20. @dickr

    Knowing the nature of the Negro, many would probably blow the reparations within the first few months or so.

    My advice to Whitey, when the Democrat Party democratic dictatorship comes and America turns blue forever, and reparations become state policy, invest in Nike and Adidas stocks.

    • Replies: @Bert
  21. anon[282] • Disclaimer says:
    @gotmituns

    The Negro is a criminal type, and the criminal , like the Beef Cattle, seeks to avoid pain.

    So, when the Jews reinstate Slavery, they won’t have much trouble getting the Blacks to do some work.

    • Troll: Turk 152
  22. Thanks for this informative article and thanks to the Unz Review for providing such an incredible website.

    The Jews and Blacks book series should be required reading in all public schools.

    • Agree: Bookish1, Ragno
  23. Subtract welfare and prison costs and reparations for blacks ends up a bill, not a payout.

  24. … those who profited the most from the 500-year destruction of Black civilization.

    That was enough for me; read no further. How can you destroy that which does not exist?

    • Troll: ploni almoni
  25. @Alfred

    Your facts are not to be trusted. You undermine every asserted fact by your saying

    “Don’t forget that Benjamin Disraeli was the prime minister for much of the time”.

    Disraeli (an Anglican btw, not Jewish by religion) died in 1881 a year before Britain took control of Egypt.

    • Disagree: thotmonger
    • Replies: @Jake
    , @Daniel.I
    , @Alfred
  26. Anon[398] • Disclaimer says:

    O
    Y

    V
    E
    Y

  27. I think to demand financial “reparations” for crimes committed long ago is unreasonable. There should be a statue of limitations, say a hundred years. Beyond that is “history”. History has been ugly for all of us, though in varying degrees. The remote descendants of criminals are not necessarily criminals themselves, nor are the remote descendants of victims necessarily victims themselves. The idea of biologically inherited guilt or suffering is nonsense, but public acknowledgement of historical crimes is apposite.

    On a different note : Louis Farrakhan, who is clearly not a full blooded Black, might have Sephardic-Jewish blood himself.

    “…WASHINGTON, D.C. — Louis Farrakhan suspects that his father may have been Jewish.

    At least that’s what he tells Henry Louis Gates Jr. in the current issue of The New Yorker magazine.

    Speaking of his father’s white Portuguese parents, the Nation of Islam leader said, “I’m going to tell you something. You really want to know what I think? I think they were members of the Jewish community.”

    He added: “I believe that in my blood, and not in a bad way. Because when I was a little boy I used to love listening to the Jewish cantors in Boston. They had a program, and every week I would listen. I was struck by the cantor, and I’ve always loved the way they sing or recite the Torah.”

    Gates, citing an academic source, says Farrakhan’s assertion about his lineage is “highly probable” given that nearly all people of Iberian descent in Jamaica and Barbados are of Sephardic Jewish ancestry.

    Farrakhan was born in 1933, the son of Mae Clark, who was from Barbados. He was named Gene after his father, a light-skinned man with straight hair from Jamaica. His father, Gates writes, was a philanderer whom the family rarely saw.

    “If in my lineage there are Jews, I would hope that in the end, before my life is over, I not only will have rendered a service to my own beloved community of black people but will also have rendered a service to the Jewish community,” Farrakhan was quoted as saying…”

    Source : The Jewish News of Northern California, April 26, 1996 : Farrakhan claims his father may have been a Jew.

    So in the case of Farrakhan, if “reparations” have to be paid, who will have to pay to whom? Farrakhan to Farrakhan?

    • Replies: @Rev. Spooner
  28. @gotmituns

    Buy a Jewish slave and let him do the bookkeeping.

  29. @Colin Wright

    But why are those “not especially bad Jews” always specialized in “not especially good” actions?

  30. Hans says:

    Looks a fine book but I am amused by “the 500-year destruction of Black civilization” line. Beethoven and Shakespeare were able to continue working despite being sold into slavery.

  31. @Priss Factor

    Well, that theory is new to me, but, assuming yours is a serious comment, and just for the sake of argument, let us suppose you are right. That process must have had a beginning, right? Then, by way of logic, there must have been an initial group of people who became civilized without the need of being enslaved first. Who were they, and what would prevent subsequent groups of doing the same?

  32. @Brás Cubas

    Unless, of course, you are supposing that the enslaver is not necessarily more civilized than the enslaved. Is that what you are implying? Enslavement per se is a civilizing experience? That makes it even more bizarre, but I have an open mind, and perhaps I may be convinced. It would take some further theoretical elaboration, for sure, but who knows? Give it a try, by all means.

  33. Tom Verso says:

    As soon as I read:

    “The selective banning by Amazon of the Nation of Islam’s The Secret Relationship Between Blacks and Jews book series…”

    I instinctively immediately went to Unz Review’s “Books Banned by Amazon Order Them Here” link.

    Not surprisingly all three books of the series are available HERE in HTML form.

    Ron Unz ‘You be da Man’! Absolutely. Thank you!

  34. Corvinus says:

    Louis Farrakhan once made an absurd claim that 75% of slaves were held by Jews. He cited the Jewish historian Harold Brackman. Mr. Brackman wrote the following letter to the New York Times, published Feb 14, 1994.

    [MORE]

    To the Editor:

    Louis Farrakhan, the Nation of Islam leader, stated in his Feb. 3 news conference that my unpublished 1977 dissertation for the University of California, Los Angeles, on the history of black-Jewish relations agreed “with everything we said” in “The Secret Relationship Between Black and Jews.” That anonymous Nation of Islam book claims that the Atlantic slave trade was “dominated” by Jewish merchants (who, according to the authoritative Jacob Rader Marcus, accounted for “considerably less than 2 percent” of the traffic).

    Mr. Farrakhan’s is the age-old anti-Semitic technique of distorting the work of Jewish scholars (and Jewish religious literature) to defame Jews. His animus against me is for writing for the Simon Siesenthal Center “Farrakhan’s Reign of Historical Error,” exposing “The Secret Relationship” as hate propaganda masquerading as history.

    My doctoral thesis – while unflinchingly documenting the involvement of Jews in the slave trade – came to the same conclusion as every other reputable work of scholarship: that in the overall scheme of things, it was extremely marginal…

    The fateful linkage between slave status and black skin as part of a divine curse was first made centuries later by Islamic writers. They used it to rationalize the Arab slave trade, which, according to the best estimates, carried more Africans in bondage north across the Sahara and east over the Red Sea (14.4 million between the years 60 and 1900) than were shipped west in European ships in the four centuries of the Atlantic slave trade.

    Mr. Farrakhan also claimed that “75 percent of the slaves owned in the South were owned by Jewish slave-holders.” In 1860, there were about 15,000 Southern Jews and 4 million slaves. If 3 million (75 percent) were so owned, this would mean 200 slaves for every Jewish man, woman and child, or 1,000 slaves for every Jewish head of household. Jews owned only a fraction of 1 percent – thousands, not millions – of the enslaved population.

    Moreover, Professor Martin made this accusation –> Rhode Island Jewish merchants controlled between 60 and 90 percent of the American trade in African slaves.

    Indeed, from 1709-1807, there are 934 recorded voyages in which Rhode Island merchants were responsible for procuring 106,000 slaves. Now, Jews arrived in Newport as early as 1658. On the eve of the Revolution, they were estimated to be around thirty families. According to historical records used (e.g. naval office shipping lists, censuses, tax records) that identified merchants and planters as Jewish, there were 347 slave ships sent to Africa by Rhode Island slave traders from 1761-1774, with 21 being funded by Aaron Lopez, a Portuguese Jew. That means 326 voyages were underwritten by non-Jews during this time frame. Of course, Jews played a role in the peddling of human flesh. The extent in this particular case is nominal compared to other ethnic groups.

    Significant holes have also been found in Martin’s scholarship. For example, Junius Rodriguez (The Historical Encyclopedia of World Slavery, Volume 1, ABC-CLIO, 1997) referenced…

    A few Jews even became prominent slave owning planters in the Old South…as successful as these Jewish Southerners were by Southern standards, they represent a very tiny percentage of the 20,000 Jews residing in the antebellum South who could, or would, ever aspire to own a slave. About 5,000 Jews owned one or more slaves – about 1.25 percent of all the slaveowners in the antebellum South…For those Jews who did own slaves, the records demonstrate that they were not significantly different from other masters in their treatments of their bondsmen.

    According to Bertram W. Korn’s research (Jews and Negro Slavery in the Old South, 1789-1865), census records and slave purchasing documents show that southern Jews “who owned slaves were concentrated in cities, not in the plantation districts containing ninety percent of the enslaved population. For example, there were only four Jews – less than one-tenth of one percent – among the 11,000 Southerners who in 1830 owned fifty or more slaves.”

    According to David Brion Davis, Professor of History Emeritus at Yale University:

    “To keep matters in perspective, we should note that in the American South, in 1830, there were only 120 Jews among the 45,000 slaveholders owning twenty or more slaves and only twenty Jews among the 12,000 slaveholders owning fifty or more slaves. Even if each member of this Jewish slaveholding elite had owned 714 slaves—a ridiculously high figure in the American South—the total number would only equal the 100,000 slaves owned by black and colored planters in St. Domingue in 1789, on the eve of the Haitian Revolution…Of course, some Jews were involved in the slave trade. Every European Western nation was. There were also some regions in which the slave trade was more accessible to Jews—Rhode Island, Newport, Holland, to name a few striking examples. The Dutch Jews weren’t persecuted, so there were quite a few who were involved.”

    From Historian Winthrop D. Jordan:

    In order to assess such a claim, one must resort to details. Martin’s purported actuality [the 75% statistic] is wrong on its face if applied to the “white population” of the United States “as a whole,” because in 1830 only a handful of white northerners still owned slaves. Jews were concentrated in the North, and they constituted a very small minority there. Even if the statement is taken as applying only to the states in the American South that had not adopted gradual emancipation laws, it remains badly flawed. A careful and honest footnote in The Secret Relationship reveals that “Jewish scholars” had concluded that Jews in the South lived mostly in towns and cities. Neither this book nor Martin’s explains the significance of this fact. In actuality, slave ownership was much more common in southern urban areas than in the southern countryside. The relatively high proportion of Jewish slaveholding was a function of the concentration of Jews in cities and towns, not of their descent or religion. It is also the case that urban slaveholders of whatever background owned fewer slaves on average than rural slaveholders, including those on large plantations. Thus the proportion of slaveholders has never been an accurate measure of the social or economic importance of slaveholding, unless it is assessed on a broadly regional or state-by-state basis. In this instance, as in so many others, the statistical data do not stand up and cry out their own true significance.

  35. @dickr

    If it comes to pass, the reparations won’t stay in the black accounts for too long but end up in accounts of people who trafficked in them in first place … do you think they will let 40 acres and a mule pass it by without making a claim on it? I don’t think so!

  36. Moi says:
    @Rational

    You might have mentioned the theft of Palestinian land.

  37. Moi says:
    @Alfred

    Okay, but whites, especially in the US, UK, France and Germany, are still polishing Jewish knobs. Nothing has changed.

  38. Truth3 says:

    Today, for example, the family that owns Home Depot may have 1 or 2 refrigerators in their home, even as their stores and warehouses may have hundreds of thousands.

    Or…

    The Home Depot Owners were Jews that descended from and were financed by those that made their bones in the Slave Trade.

    See any Blanks or Marcuses in the book?

  39. Pheasant says:
    @Priss Factor

    I personally am just glad to know everything worked out and that blacks are now productive members of society.

    • Replies: @Priss Factor
  40. Pheasant says:
    @renfro

    ‘southern whites showed their opinion of the Jews behavior by ostracizing them from polite society ….well into the late 70’s Jews couldnt get a reservation at any of the gentile resorts like the famous Sea Island Ga…..or the golf resorts if their life depended on it …..if your name sounded even a bit Jewish there was nothing available for you.’

    The south was famously philo-semitic and Jews had no problems blending into a society where blacks were the main feared group due to population size. This is why when local Jews supported northern Jews engaging in civil rights agitation southern Whites were incensed.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
    , @renfro
    , @renfro
  41. Pheasant says:
    @Colin Wright

    Slaving is a Jewish specialty. The word slave comes from Jewish traders selling slavic people to muslims.

    The first slave plantations in the new world were Jewish sugar plantations in Brazil.

    The trans atlantic slave trade could not have happened without both sephardic and ashkenazic Jews.

    Slavery is not illegal in Israel so long as its victims are non-jews. The White slave trade (prostitution) is huge in Israel.

    • Replies: @Colin Wright
    , @nokangaroos
  42. @Alfred

    Benjamin Disraeli converted to Anglicanism and was fairly critical of Jews. Douglas Reed, in his book “The Controversy of Zion” – maybe the most comprehensive book ever written about Jewish crimes throughout history – has nothing but good things to say about Disraeli.

  43. Hans says:

    Some interesting links here – https://christiansfortruth.com/jewish-dominance-of-the-african-slave-trade/

    Sowell states in one video that more whites were enslaved in N. Africa than blacks in the US.

    • Replies: @Franklin Ryckaert
  44. Anon[421] • Disclaimer says:

    1619 Project should be 1492 Project. In that year Pope Alexander VI (Rodrigo Borgia) issued a Papal Bull to award the African slave trade to Portugal. He also settled the dispute between Spain and Portugal after Columbus returned from his discovery. Everything east of a line he drew on a map belonged to Spain, everything east to Portugal. Since the line cut through South America at Brazil that country became a Spanish possession, with the rest going to Spain. Which means reparations will never happen, nor should they.

  45. tomo says:
    @Anon

    of course – all the victims of psychopaths and psychopathic ‘cultures’ have irrational hate for their tormentors
    that’s the founding principle of their Psychopath Support Group/ ‘religion’

  46. Anon[309] • Disclaimer says:
    @Priss Factor

    “But then, ALL PEOPLES were brought to civilization through slavery and serfdom.“

    Great argument actually, to avoid slavery reparations. It was actually a kindness.Now can you come up with another one for German war crimes? Or are you jewish?

    • Replies: @Priss Factor
  47. @Hans

    That’s right. The numbers are 1,000,000 and 400,000 respectively. It’s about time to talk about “reparations” from the Muslims.

    • Replies: @Hans
    , @Curmudgeon
  48. @Sick of Orcs

    The American Negro enjoys the greatest standard of living out of all Negroes in this world. He has been compensated many times over by the welfare state and affirmative action programs.

    That being said, the reparation money will end up in the pockets of Jews as Blacks blow it all on knick-knacks and designer clothes. so from a White perspective, you can cut your losses by buying lots of Nike shares.

    • Replies: @Sick of Orcs
  49. Jake says:
    @Wizard of Oz

    Racially/ethnically 100% Jewish and religiously/politically/culturally Anglican.

    Sounds like the bankers of Anglo-Zionist Empire

    Disraeli, of course, had unending contempt for the vast majority of the natives of the British Isles, basically everybody but the Brit WASP Elite.

  50. @Franklin Ryckaert

    Azkanazis are not Semites, so why call them Semites?
    And how long is Long?
    2000 years and the land is still yours?
    70 years and you parasites are still milking Germany.
    Who are you to put an arbitrary ‘100’ years? Why not 2000 years?

    • Replies: @Nonny Mouse
  51. Hans says:
    @Franklin Ryckaert

    Franklin, what source would you recommend on the topic. Thanks.

    • Replies: @Franklin Ryckaert
  52. @Pheasant

    ‘… Slavery is not illegal in Israel so long as its victims are non-jews. The White slave trade (prostitution) is huge in Israel…’

    Oh, Israel is another matter.

    I never said that Jews were culturally indistinguishable from other groups. We’ve all got our features — or bugs, depending on how one looks at them.

    Israel exacerbates everything that is worst in Jewish culture. It’s an anti-semite’s vision of Judaism, incarnate.

    • Replies: @bjondo
  53. “A Jewish slave-broker offered special payment terms for “negroes” like furniture—payable in one year. Jews Selling Black slaves on layaway!”

    Binyamin Netanyahu was a former furniture salesman. But he changed vocations into (sub)human trafficking.

    Now he has 535 especially obedient, utterly willing slaves at his disposal, i.e., the US Congress.

    (And if you make him an offer, he may even throw in a US president…..)

    • LOL: Twodees Partain
  54. Learner says:

    Interesting article. Thank you.

  55. jstor.org Review of Virginia Bever Platt’s article :
    “And don’t forget the Guinea voyage : The slave trade of Aaron Lopez [Sephardic Jew] of Newport Rhode Island ”
    “…the current tendency to treat the triangular trade as mythical overlooks the role of a prominent Newport ,Rhode Island merchant ,Aaron Lopez , who sent fourteen vessels to the slave coast between 1761 and 1774 . These voyages are documented in detail in the Lopez commercial papers…Lopez, a Sephardic Jew, emigrated in 1752 from Portugal to Newport …”and became the wealthiest person in Newport, Rhode Island . He is said to have owned 26 ships and financed the voyages of other merchant slavers . Lopez was instrumental in the founding and financing of the Touro Synagogue in Newport .
    P.S. Ron thank you for including this article on your site, as most of the articles I read on the Unz Review appear to be written by White males , kindly include articles from sites such as the Black Agenda Report(BAR) which give a different perspective on current and past events .

  56. Paul says:

    Black Africans also sold each other into slavery. Tribes warring with each other would execute those they captured or sell them to slave traders.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
    , @TKK
    , @anon_382
  57. @Rev. Spooner

    Sephardic Jews, the original Spanish ones, are not Semites either. Except after the Islamic conquest of Spain there was an Arab ingredient and Arabs are Semites. But they go back to the Hellenistic era when rabbis were aggressively proselytizing all over that world. Shlomo Sand makes the additional point that their Jewish language was inconsistent with a Hebrew origin. The Apostle Paul mentioned around AD 50 his plans to visit Spain presumably to speak at synagogues there but he would have spoken in Greek with his hand on the Septuagint.

    • Replies: @ploni almoni
  58. bjondo says:
    @Colin Wright

    Israel exacerbates everything that is worst in Jewish culture.

    Israel is true Jew/Judaizm.
    No controls. No pretense.

    5ds

    • Replies: @Nonny Mouse
  59. DaveE says:
    @Priss Factor

    What an idiotic assertion. I’m sure the great mathematicians like Euler and Newton thought about mathematics and geniuses like Tesla defined magnetic theory and Van Gogh painted and Beethoven composed and the great architects built beautiful structures, etc. etc. etc. because some ultra-enlightened Chosen slaver kept them in shackles and told them to create something beautiful.

    I think you must be a Jew because your comment willfully negates God and gives credit to violent, totalitarian monsters instead, so typical of the self-worshiping Jew.

    • Replies: @Priss Factor
  60. Corvinus says:
    @Pheasant

    “southern whites showed their opinion of the Jews behavior by ostracizing them from polite society”

    You mean Southrons, not southern whites. There is a major difference culturally and genetically.

    “This is why when local Jews supported northern Jews engaging in civil rights agitation southern Whites were incensed.”

    Again, Southrons were incensed.

    “Slaving is a Jewish specialty.”

    Actually, it’s a humanity specialty.

    “The trans atlantic slave trade could not have happened without both sephardic and ashkenazic Jews.”

    Or non-Jews for that matter. But you over hype the role of Jews. Please read Comment 34 to properly educate yourself.

    • Agree: TKK
    • Replies: @Nonny Mouse
  61. Paul says:

    On February 26, 2019, the Anti-Defamation League forced Amazon to ban The Secret Relationship Between Blacks & Jews book series. Jews are off limits, but Germans, for example, are fair game. It is interesting how that works.

  62. Corvinus says:
    @Paul

    “Black Africans also sold each other into slavery. Tribes warring with each other would execute those they captured or sell them to slave traders.”

    Context is needed here. European slave traders entered “preexisting circuits of exchange” when they arrived in the 16th century. European demand changed the shape of this market, strengthening enslavers and ensuring that more and more people would be carried away. European money and technology further empowered those who were already dominant, encouraging them to enslave greater numbers.

    Furthermore, slavery was practiced for a host of reasons in Africa. Read and learn.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slavery_in_Africa#Slavery_practices_throughout_Africa

    • Replies: @Hans
  63. @Corvinus

    “Slaving is a Jewish speciality.”

    Actually, it’s a humanity specialty.

    Specialty. Ask the person who typed that for you to open a dictionary and read to you the meaning of “specialty” to properly educate you.

    • Agree: Fuerchtegott
    • Replies: @Corvinus
  64. TKK says:
    @gotmituns

    They (90% black workforce) are paid $27 an hour as custodial staff at the VA Hospital in Fayetteville,NC.

    Before an inspection, the Facilities Manager (black female) hires a white/Jewish owned professional cleaning crew to frantically clean for 5 days on 3 hour shifts.

    As they claim federal health benefits and pensions, they take naps on buffer mop stacks in closets and jive outside on their cell phones most of the day as trash spills out of the cans.. If you instruct them to…. you know…. actually clean… they may tell you to fuck off. They are union, they are black, they are untouchable.

    They are sleek, well fed, well financed and arrogant.

    You’d have to see it to believe it. It’s obscene.

  65. TKK says:
    @Paul

    Coastal, more sophisticated blacks, exposed to trade and exotic port people and merchandise, captured and sold interior, more isolated blacks. These interior blacks were a commodity, like salt or cooking oil.

    Indeed, without the cooperation of their own, slaving would have been too bloody to be cost effective.

    Today, drive 30 minutes outside of Dubai proper. You will see modern day slaves living 15 men to a room, with their passports “held” and forced to work construction in the wilting heat, under the lash of Muslims and Chinese.

    Peace be Upon Them!

    • Replies: @Paul
    , @bjondo
  66. Aardvark says:
    @Pat Kittle

    My lineal ancestors were German albeit they did not come to the U.S. until the late 1860’s.
    Nevertheless, does this mean I can start victimizing myself perpetually and blame any of my failures in life on this etc.? If so I can’t wait…

  67. @Hans

    For African slaves brought to the US :

    ” The most comprehensive analysis of shipping records over the course of the slave trade is the Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade Database, edited by professors David Eltis and David Richardson. (While the editors are careful to say that all of their figures are estimates, I believe that they are the best estimates that we have, the proverbial “gold standard” in the field of the study of the slave trade.) Between 1525 and 1866, in the entire history of the slave trade to the New World, according to the Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade Database, 12.5 million Africans were shipped to the New World. 10.7 million survived the dreaded Middle Passage, disembarking in North America, the Caribbean and South America.

    And how many of these 10.7 million Africans were shipped directly to North America? Only about 388,000. That’s right: a tiny percentage…”

    Source : The African Americans. many rivers to cross with Henry Louis Gates, Jr. How many slaves landed in the U.S.?

    For the Muslim slave raids on Europe :

    “…In his 2003 book Christian Slaves, Muslim Masters: White Slavery in the Mediterranean, the Barbary Coast and Italy, 1500–1800, Ohio State University history professor Robert Davis states that most modern historians minimize the white slave trade. Davis estimates that slave traders from Tunis, Algiers, and Tripoli alone enslaved 1 million to 1.25 million Europeans in North Africa, from the beginning of the 16th century to the middle of the 18th (these numbers do not include the European people who were enslaved by Morocco and by other raiders and traders of the Mediterranean Sea coast)…”

    Source : Wikipedia, Barbary Slave Trade.

    • Replies: @Twodees Partain
  68. This should most definitely be taught in schools around the world.

    The Prime Minister of Israel, as the spokesman for international Judea, should issue an apology. Israel should dedicate a memorial to remembrance of their role in the black holocaust. This shameful chapter in Jewish history must not be forgotten, lest it happen again.

    Of course Jews would oppose it. Just as whites should oppose collective guilt over history long past.

  69. Corvinus says:
    @Nonny Mouse

    It’s a humanity speciality. We, as human beings, have devoted much time and effort in perfecting the enslavement of others. Now, try to offer a cogent response to Comment 34 and report back to us.

    • Disagree: Fuerchtegott
  70. Z-man says:

    “Jews Selling Blacks” Book Stirs Reparations Movement

    As long as they get the money from the Jews, I’m alright with that.

  71. Bert says:
    @Priss Factor

    Yep, that’s a process that the British borderers missed out on. No slavery, no feudalism. Just bastle houses, peel towers, and a clan chieftain who led from the front in battle. Their descendants were those folks in Richmond last month.

  72. melpol says:

    Trading various sorts of merchandise kept Jews prosperous. But when business was slow they sold slaves of all races, not only blacks. But blacks sold certain types of Jews as slaves. They were Jews that were retarded.

  73. Bert says:
    @Just passing through

    Most NFL retirees go bankrupt. My neighbor was one. He pulled in 9 million and went through it all in five years. When the bank foreclosed on him and he was moving out of his erstwhile house, he went around and salvaged all the large bulbs in the outdoor lights. Really had his priorities right.

  74. Paul says:
    @TKK

    My landlord and ladylady met in the Gulf States. He was working on land-mine clearing in Iraq. She was was one of a number of Filipinas working as laborers for oil-rich Arabs.

  75. Agent76 says:

    Feb 3, 2020 Wilmington’s Lie: The Murderous Coup of 1898 and the Rise of White Supremacy

    By the 1890s, Wilmington was North Carolina’s largest city and a shining example of a mixed-race community with a burgeoning African American middle class.

    MAY 26, 2019 Reconstruction and Jim Crow Laws

    Historian Henry Louis Gates talked about Reconstruction, which lasted from the end of the Civil War until 1877, the amendments passed during this time to promote equality for African Americans, and thesubsequent Jim Crow laws and other measures used in southern states to re-establish white supremacy.

    https://www.c-span.org/video/?460492-2/reconstruction-jim-crow-laws

    • Replies: @Twodees Partain
  76. @interesting

    Good luck getting POC to differentiate between Jews and whites from a Christian background. POC are stupid. And their hatred of whitey gives them power in a civilization created by whitey. I guess whitey is stupid too.

  77. @Pat Kittle

    Maybe you should add Russians to the list.

    • Agree: Pat Kittle
  78. Hans says:
    @Corvinus

    Yes, but first they had to somehow surmount the qualms of those Africans selling their “brothers”. Truly amazing.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  79. bjondo says:
    @TKK

    … modern day slaves living 15 men to a room, with their passports “held” and forced to work construction in the wilting heat, under the lash of Muslims and Chinese.

    And Jew. Israel worse.

    5ds

  80. This article is a classic case of feeding the ogre inside poorly developed minds. It is not unlike how many other prejudicial story lines are developed for instance the view of certain Black people that White people are are “satanic” by simple association of a skin color with numerous acts of oppression. You take some simple associative data, you make inferences toward a human characteristic that is not of real consequence to the behavior, and you let the hate and suspicion inherent in our species do the rest. Or the author is dumb as a board, take your pick.

    If one honestly wished to particularize a characteristic of the slave seller, perhaps to educate children to beware, or to search in the right place for more records for like events, one would not choose ethnicity, race, or religion. They would choose the characteristic, “capitalist.”

    The purer the Capitalist, the less an economic transaction is connected to humane ethics. The purer the capitalist, the greater the urge & mission to enact economic exchange for gain. When someone in some time past killed the last of a remarkably beautiful bird species so it’s plumage could become a hat, they didn’t do it because of where they were born or what color their skin was, they did it for money. Thus, as we know very well; many sorts of people sold or bought slaves. But all who did were capitalists. Capitalism is the state of mind that operated slavery, and it is capitalism that deserves to be examined & critiqued for that awful business.

  81. GeeBee says:

    “Besides their important position in the sugar industry…they dominated the slave trade….The buyers who appeared at the auctions were almost always Jews, and because of this lack of competitors they could buy slaves at low prices.”

    It is well known that Jewish families often assumed fanciful names on arrival in the USA, and these names frequently alluded to their trades, and thus their source of wealth. In this regard, Mark Zuckerberg’s family might well appear to have grown rich through the West Indian slave trade, whereby huge wealth accrued to those using slaves to accumulate a ‘mountain of sugar’ (in German, ‘ein Zuckerberg’)…

    • Agree: thotmonger
  82. Corvinus says:
    @Hans

    “Yes, but first they had to somehow surmount the qualms of those Africans selling their “brothers”. Truly amazing.”

    You mean in the same way Europeans overcame their grief and continued to butcher their own brethren from 1400-1600 in several continental wars? I was under the impression that white Europeans were united. Absolutely stunning.

  83. @Pat Kittle

    No one owes the Muslims anything. So far as I can tell, the Islamic countries of North Africa and the Middle East were the greatest slave trading civilization in all of human history, and if that isn’t enough, their endless military aggression and piracy against non-Muslims surely squares any debt that the rest of the world may owe them.

  84. @Beachcolonist

    …Thus, as we know very well; many sorts of people sold or bought slaves. But all who did were capitalists. Capitalism is the state of mind that operated slavery, and it is capitalism that deserves to be examined & critiqued for that awful business.

    Thanks for your (((Bolshevik))) redirect.

    • Replies: @Beachcolonist
  85. anon_382 says:

    they’re going to make the American taxpayer pay for what a select few did

    privatize the gain, socialize the cost

    why not go after the families and companies who got rich using slaves and trading in slaves instead of making the innocent pay their bill? I hear the Rothschilds were one of them

  86. bjondo says:
    @The Plutonium Kid

    The Plutonium Kid –

    poison from a cubicle in Israel
    or Brooklyn.

    5ds

    • Replies: @BDS Always
  87. @Beachcolonist

    I suspect some of my ancient British Isle ancestors were Roman slaves. I have never heard the word capitalism used to describe the Roman empire.

    • Replies: @Beachcolonist
  88. If Farrakhan wants to go after the Jews for reparations, I’ll pop some popcorn for everyone here.

    • Agree: Republic
  89. anon_382 says:
    @Corvinus

    That anonymous Nation of Islam book claims that the Atlantic slave trade was “dominated” by Jewish merchants (who, according to the authoritative Jacob Rader Marcus, accounted for “considerably less than 2 percent” of the traffic).

    knowing that jews have been merchants since when, forever?? (((marcus’))) claims make no sense

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  90. anon_382 says:
    @Paul

    according to this NYT article:

    https://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/23/opinion/23gates.html

    The historians John Thornton and Linda Heywood of Boston University estimate that 90 percent of those shipped to the New World were enslaved by Africans and then sold to European traders.

    and the following article is worth reading. if true it shows that most of what we “learned” from TV series like Roots were fiction. The coastal Africans played an active role in enslaving and selling Africans from the interior. The history we learned was a scam designed to portray whites as uniquely evil:

    https://hauda.org/2018/12/07/the-infernal-slave-trade-what-role-africans/

    [MORE]

    Yes, the African slave market expanded enormously due to European demand and the European trade goods that flooded the interior, but it was organized and run by Africans. Coastal Africans purchased slaves from the interior slave markets, and exchanged them with Europeans on the coast for the European goods the Africans on the coast and the interior wanted. Those European goods found their way back into the interior where they were sometimes used to purchase slaves. The African side of the slave trade stretched hundreds of miles into the interior where trade networks stimulated by the European manufactures had been going for a long time. The Europeans had very little knowledge of these interior markets, and were usually not permitted to travel into the interior to find slaves, contrary to what we sometimes see in movies and on television.

    It is important to recognize that the African slave merchants were not passive players, that if the Africans on the coast did not want what the Europeans had brought to exchange, they did not trade slaves. The Atlantic Slavery historian Herbert S. Klein tells us that European slave traders who brought trade goods for exchange were subject to the vagaries of demand on the African coast. If, for example, a particular type of fabric that was in fashion last year, but no longer in fashion this year was offered, the coastal people would say no deal—yes, something as fickle as fashion could frustrate slave buyers, because that fabric was an economic good that had to be exchangeable in the interior markets. If people no longer demanded it, it was of no use as an exchange good for slaves. Contrary to popular stereotypes about accepting cheap and worthless articles, the Africans were very discriminating about the goods they accepted for the slaves.

    • Replies: @Pat Kittle
  91. renfro says:
    @Pheasant

    Dont know where you get your information but totally wrong.

    Southerners weren’t ‘philo-semitic ‘ as you put it…..they would ‘do business’ with Jews but not ‘socialize’ with them……there was a distinct difference and separation there.

    There werent many Southern Jews agitating publically for civil rights ….to do so would have aroused the ire of the white politicians and damaged the Jews business interest.

  92. @The Plutonium Kid

    No one owes the Muslims anything. So far as I can tell, the Islamic countries of North Africa and the Middle East were the greatest slave trading civilization in all of human history, and if that isn’t enough, their endless military aggression and piracy against non-Muslims surely squares any debt that the rest of the world may owe them.

    No one owes the Jews anything. So far as I can tell, the Jews in countries worldwide were the greatest war-mongering civilization in all of human history, and if that isn’t enough, their endless military aggression and criminality against non-Jews surely squares any debt that the rest of the world may owe them.

    (Fixed it for you.)

    • Replies: @The Plutonium Kid
  93. renfro says:
    @Pheasant

    How it was. Jews were considered ill mannered, loud and pushy, traits that Southerners looked down on so they excluded from the social realm in the South.

    http://www.jta.org › 1966/01/12 › archive › anti-defamation-league-files-co…

    Anti-defamation League Files Complaint Against Southern …

    Charges filed against The Cloister, of Sea Island, Ga., by Arnold Forster, … the Breakers Hotel of Palm Beach, Fla., for “denying accommodations to Jews.

  94. @Brás Cubas

    Then, by way of logic, there must have been an initial group of people who became civilized without the need of being enslaved first.

    But they had to do the mass-enslaving. It doesn’t matter if a people enslaved or were enslaved. The fact is the only way order over large population could have been attained in barbaric times was by the strong hand.

    Now, slavery per se will not lead to civilization because even savage-primitive tribes and Mongol barbarians and Viking barbarians practiced slavery. But that was like ad hoc slavery.
    For there to be civilization, there had to be mass coordinated institutionalized slavery or something like slavery, an iron hand over a vast populace. By modern ethical standards, most of human history was one of slavery.

    Freedom and individuality sprouted from Iron Order when there was sufficient material wealth and means of cultivating minds so that, even without the Iron Hand, people could act orderly on basis of moral learning and rule of law. But first, there had to be the Iron Hand that forced people to Obey and sumbit.

    Whites went through this long ago. So did yellows. As blacks were savage, offering them freedom would have meant them acting more savage. So, they had to be whupped and forced into submission before they could take steps toward roles in civilization.

    • Replies: @Franklin Ryckaert
  95. @Old and grumpy

    You have never heard … this says more about you, than about Romans. Rome was pre-corporate, we associate capitalism with the legal idea of incorporation for limited liability. In Ancient Rome everyone certainly traded goods for money or services, sought out the best prices, and sought to become more wealthy. Rome was indeed ruled by it’s millionaires of the the time.

    However Romans operated a variation of a fascist state, and in fascism capitalism is under state control which is of course different from for instance Libertarian capitalism. Fascism is a patriarchy, where the politics is militarized and all the important entities, including businesses, serve the state as in Rome. (Modern political fascism was indeed invented in Italy, as I am sure you know. Or perhaps you don’t.)
    In any case Roman slavery and African slavery were related but not the same thing. Your point is simply put, a non sequitur.

  96. @Brás Cubas

    Konrad Lorenz (“Das sogenannte Böse”) elaborated at length on this …

    Some degree of domestication (in the biologist sense) and suppression of the male display (“mousegreying of the male”) are conditiones sine quae non of civilization.
    But whatever slavery did to the Affirmative Action American, it most definitely did NOT take the looksatmuh out of them – so Priss´theory in the current form is not tenable 😛

  97. @Pat Kittle

    I’m Irish Catholic if your ignorant, childish, & cowardly use of multiple parenthesis is supposed to imply something else. And I am a businessman.
    I would guess you have never read a thing about either the Irish or Bolsheviks, and you probably are satisfied with being dumb, with some things you hate to keep you agitated. I would feel sorry for you, if I were a weakling.

    • Replies: @Pat Kittle
    , @redmudhooch
  98. @anon_382

    (((anon_382))):

    (((Your repeated attempts))) to distract us from the subject here (“Jews Selling Blacks”) cite (((sources))) like:
    a) (((New York Times))),
    b) (((Hollywood’s “Roots”))),
    c) (((Atlantic Slavery historian Herbert S. Klein))),
    d) (((movies and on television))).

    Yes, Blacks were deeply involved in the Black transatlantic slave trade.

    What is far less known is that Jews pretty much ran things at the top. (((Your job))) of course, is to keep the goyim from noticing that.

    BTW, (((Hollywood))) cranks out endless (((anti-White agitprop))) about the alleged “Holocaust” & the transatlantic slave trade. When will (((Hollywood))) do its very-first-ever-movie about the dominant role of Jews in the slave trade?

    {{CRICKETS}}

    • Replies: @anon_382
    , @Cycling Goddess
  99. @Pheasant

    I personally am just glad to know everything worked out and that blacks are now productive members of society.

    It might have worked out IF the civilizational-slavery of blacks went on for 1,000s of years.
    After all, whites, yellows, and browns underwent both climactic and civilo-enslaving forces for much longer. As the result, their wilder genes got weeded out. Those who acted too crazy were exiled or executed. And this process happened over millenniums to produce a more docile race.

    Now, imagine if blacks had been enslaved for 2,00o yrs under whites, and let’s say whites in that time weeded out the oogity-boogity genes. Then, blacks might have ended up milder and more cooperative. But black slavery in the US lasted only 2 centuries, and that wasn’t enough to weed out the crazyass gene.

  100. @DaveE

    Euler and Newton thought about mathematics and geniuses like Tesla defined magnetic theory and Van Gogh painted and Beethoven composed and the great architects built beautiful structures, etc. etc. etc. because some ultra-enlightened Chosen slaver kept them in shackles and told them to create something beautiful.

    Don’t be a dammy. I never said slavery = Western genius. Western genius required lots of freedom and liberty, BUT before talented people could be free to do their thing, they needed to live in a stable order where people obeyed the rules than ran around like barbarian hordes or savage nomads. In other words, Newton and Vogh couldn’t have operated in a Europe overrun by Viking warriors, Germanic barbarians, or Hun raiders. They had to live in a world where they could walk down the street safely and not worry about being bashed over the head. And the first phase in creating such an order was by slavery or some iron-fisted way of control. It’s like what Hobbes wrote in LEVIATHAN.

    When whites encountered blacks, the latter were still living in something like a state of nature with oogity-boogity-ness as the main way of life. Blacks in such state would’t have know what to do with freedom. So, in order for them to live in civilization, they had to undergo what white folks had undergone in earlier times when they made the slow transition from barbarism to civilization. They needed a massuh-figure to whup their asses if they got out of line.

  101. @Corvinus

    Louis Farrakhan once made an absurd claim that 75% of slaves were held by Jews

    LOL. We need to pass laws criminalizing denial of this fact. I will volunteer to flag the Twitter posts.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  102. @Father O'Hara

    Bless me father, for I have sinned. My thoughts regarding some aspects of this essay are uncharitable and therefore un-Christian:

    – the 500-year destruction of Black civilization.

    Kenneth Clark, in his TV series Civilization stated that the Scandinavian viking era was not a civilization. It was a form of culture, and had aspects of organization, but it was not a culture. If the people who traded across the continent, across the Atlantic, harvested trees to build halls and villages, produced fine ships and weapons were not a civilization (no matter how warlike), I am struggling to see how people who were hunter gatherers and lived in straw huts were a civilization.

    – Long before the Nazis forced Jews to wear yellow stars,

    The Nazis didn’t “force” Jews to wear yellow stars, the German Zionists proposed that Jews wear yellow stars after they were painted, during the short-lived boycott of Jewish merchants, on the windows of stores owned by Jews.

    – The #MeToo and Women’s March movements should be aware that at least 24 of these Jewish men advertised Black women and girls as “WENCHES.”

    Well boo-effing-hoo. They used a word in its proper context. Shakespeare called women wenches.
    https://www.etymonline.com/word/wench The concept of wench as being of loose morals or a prostitute is a 20th century creation.

    Can I get away with a “Hail Mary” for my sins?

  103. @Brás Cubas

    Slavery comes in many forms. The chattel slavery that ended in the 19th century has been replaced with wage/debt slavery. Same owners, different form of slavery.
    It seems that most civilizations began around religious dogma of some sort. Enforcing that belief system on people is a form of slavery, just as a strict adherence to a political philosophy, whether it be Marxism, Finance Capitalism, or any other, enslaves the mind.

  104. @Priss Factor

    The Barbarians of Europe were civilized by Christianity, not by “slavery”. Similarly Buddhism had a civilizing effect on many peoples of Asia, including the murderous Mongols.

    • Agree: Nonny Mouse
    • Replies: @Priss Factor
    , @Anon
  105. Crazy Horse says: • Website
    @The Plutonium Kid

    Such an appropriate name for a commenter with a poisoned mind taking the handle of one of the most toxic substances known to man meaning you don’t have to work too hard to be obnoxious.

    Was your handle yours or your Hasbera clown bosses’ idea?

    • Agree: Pat Kittle
  106. @Franklin Ryckaert

    I believe the 1,000,000 number is an estimation of those taken from the Mediterranean and Atlantic Coast. There has never been a clear number of those taken from the Slavic nations. For example, aside from the young women taken to be sex slaves in a harem, it was common for the Ottomans to take a male child from a family and indoctrinate him for many years for army service. Technically, not a “slave”, but certainly enslaved.

  107. @Beachcolonist

    “Beachcolonist” the “Irish Catholic”:

    Before you call anyone who uses their own real first & last name “cowardly” perhaps you should do likewise.

    Furthermore, your fear of publicly acknowledging the subject here (“Jews Selling Blacks”) doesn’t require a whole lot of courage.

    BTW, we here at the Unz Report are fully aware of the pernicious presence of “hasbara” — and their willingness to impersonate non-Jews. As a result, there’s no way of telling whether you are what you claim to be.

    Do have a nice day, won’t you!
    🙂

    • Replies: @Beachcolonist
  108. those who profited the most from the 500-year destruction of Black civilization

    1. “Those” would be other native African black slave owners. In all the major African empires slavery was commonplace.

    2. When these empires began began selling slaves to European traders, they got European wares and goods in return and their level of civilization increased a little with this access to European technology.

    3. Black civilization was not truly destroyed until they were colonized and slavery was forcibly abolished. When they were de-colonized, Black civilization could reassert itself and slavery made a comeback in some cases.

    [MORE]

    Slavery in Mali

    Slavery in Mali exists today, with as many as 200,000 people held in direct servitude to a master. Since 2006, a movement called Temedt has been active in Mali struggling against the persistence of slavery and the discrimination associated with ex-slaves. There were reports that in the Tuareg Rebellion of 2012, ex-slaves were recaptured by their former masters.

    When the area came under French colonial control in 1898, as French Sudan, the French authorities formally abolished slavery in 1905.

    When the Republic of Mali achieved independence in 1960, the government tried to further undermine the institution of slavery but efforts were largely stalled when the military dictatorship of Moussa Traoré took over the country from 1968 until 1991.

  109. anon_382 says:
    @Pat Kittle

    wow, you found me out, Clouseau

    maybe you can explain my comment at #90?

    • Replies: @Pat Kittle
  110. @Pheasant

    More exactly both “slav” and “slave” derive from the Church Latin term “sclavi” for the heathens of the Northeast; other than baptismal status there was no difference between Germanic and Slavic (also an artificial church language) peoples noted then.

  111. @Pat Kittle

    Speaking to the issue of slave commerce as capitalism is not “Hasbara.” Hasbara is Zionist propaganda diminishing the culpability of Israel in it’s occupation. I offered no such thing and while I certainly have read more deeply about the origins of Zionism than you, my views on that tribal movement were not part of my post.

    I never once refuted that Jews sold slaves and did not need to, to make my point that slave commerce’s practitioners were unethical capitalists. YOU, in your bigoted freakout, ran right past the point I was making, so you could flip out over demons of your imagination. Telling anyone to use their own name online is not only poor Internet use practice, it’s childish. You either cannot read for content, or you are a maniac. Which is it?

    You bring to mind for me Malcolm X elegantly mocking a critic who called him a liar, telling them they need to rethink that they are so important that he would feel the need to lie to them, when in fact they were relative intellectual peons to whom he has no such need. I feel the same way about you.

    My great grandfather was executed by the British in Ireland in the late 1890s for fighting their oppression and bigotry. We Irish do not suffer small minded bigots without stepping up to fight them and that is my purpose here. I an not the least bit impressed by your C- writing presenting grade F ideas and fantasies about how you see Jews in the woodwork controlling your world. Sadly enough they certainly own a good portion of your mind.

    • Replies: @Pat Kittle
    , @anon_382
  112. @The Plutonium Kid

    This is a truly horrendous piece of ignorance on display. As opposed to Judaism, a tribal religion, Islam does not have a tribal/ethnic preponderance. Muslims span the entire globe’s ethnic mix – Arabs, Asians, Africans and to a lesser extent, Caucasians. Among them also are millions of Black African Muslims, of whom a substantial number were slaves captured in Africa and traded in the New World as human merchandise. Now that the Jewish role in slavery is coming to light, this ill-informed attempt at using a broad brush to paint all Muslims as traders in slavery, is an effort at deflecting attention from the Jewish role in slavery. Neither this hasbara troll nor attempts to use the so-called alliance of Jews and Blacks in the civil rights movement as cover for what went on well before that era, will wash.

    • Agree: thotmonger
  113. @Agent76

    The Jim Crow laws originated in Delaware. Northern states had the Black Codes.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  114. Richard B says:
    @Pat Kittle

    The Irish, even the Anglo-Celts, and, of course, The Scots-Irish.

    In short, White people (sorry E. Michael Jones).

    But, since complaining is so degrading, and Whites have never been all that good at it, better to leave it to those who know how, ie; blacks and The KKK.

    The only real KKK in existence today.

    The Kvetching Kosher Khazars.

  115. @Franklin Ryckaert

    The Barbarians of Europe were civilized by Christianity, not by “slavery”.

    No, it was the rise of barbarian kings who imposed order over their subjects. Sure, Christianity was useful as a mind-control tool. But Christianity alone wouldn’t have done it. For centuries, many Europeans were serfs who, by today’s standards, were like slaves. Even though Christianity preached peace and ‘turn the other cheek’, the barbarian overlords imposed brutal authority over their minions. People who got out of line were punished or killed. There was a strict military hierarchy under feudalism — same in Japan.

    Also, Christianity was useful as a slavery-civilizing tool because it preached a ‘slave morality’, i.e. the minions should accept their lot in life, be passive, be meek and humble, and accept the divine right of lords and kings.

  116. @Beachcolonist

    My my, you sure are full of yourself!
    🙂
    I’ll simply remind you (again) — the subject here is the largely unknown reality of “Jews Selling Blacks” — a topic you reluctantly, briefly admit before (again) steering the subject away from “Jews Selling Blacks.”

    As a self-proclaimed “businessman” you have a curiously persistent habit of changing the subject to the evils of capitalism.

    Now don’t get all huffy — even though that is amusing.
    🙂

    • Agree: Bookish1
  117. anon_382 says:
    @Beachcolonist

    My great grandfather was executed by the British in Ireland in the late 1890s for fighting their oppression and bigotry. We Irish do not suffer small minded bigots without stepping up to fight them and that is my purpose here.

    this sounds like something a jew pretending to be Irish would say

    as does the rest of the paragraph

    • Replies: @Beachcolonist
  118. Corvinus says:
    @anon_382

    “knowing that jews have been merchants since when, forever?? (((marcus’))) claims make no sense”

    OK, so you’re going to have to flesh out your response here, as it demonstrably vague.

  119. Corvinus says:
    @Hippopotamusdrome

    “LOL. We need to pass laws criminalizing denial of this fact. I will volunteer to flag the Twitter posts.”

    How about offering a cogent rebuttal to the evidence I provided?

  120. Corvinus says:
    @Twodees Partain

    Actually, the first states to have black codes, aka Jim Crow laws, were Mississippi and South Carolina in 1865. Delaware was a decade later.

  121. @anon_382

    wow, you found me out, Clouseau

    maybe you can explain my comment at #90?

    I don’t have time to peruse your comment history, but I will give you the benefit of the doubt.

    I may have been too quick to reply to you. I apologize for that.

  122. @bjondo

    Agree. Israel makes clear the deep evil of Judaism which without it we would never have noticed. There was universal affection for the Jews post-WW2. Now they whinge about a rapid current growth of “antisemitism” (their fake racist word.)

    What reversed the trend? Why the rising criticism of Jews? Israel. Their fiendish, ultra-Nazi treatment of all the Gentiles they have power over. Plus the WWW which allows us to know what the MSM stay silent about.

    • Replies: @Twodees Partain
  123. Anon[342] • Disclaimer says:

    And Blacks, “in alarming numbers,” are becoming more and more aware of this meticulously shrouded part of Black Holocaust history.

    Even if its the vocal concerns of one billion Blacks vs the protest of one Jew,

    Blacks should be prepared for the MSM to call the concern a conspiracy theory and not delve into its facts.

    Nor the Jewish religious belief that supports them.

    That’s just how this goes.

    Which everyone should know by now.

    When it comes to Judaism, the best anyone will ever get is something like:
    “this is sort of true” but
    “this is the other side of that” (even if there isn’t another morally legitimate side to it) and
    “don’t be antisemitic”.

    This is what will occur from of the MSM until the end of the World.

    Which means open conspiracy.

    • Replies: @Nonny Mouse
  124. Bookish1 says:

    If anti semitism keeps increasing at the same rate it has these past few years imagine what it will be like 5 or 10 years from now.

  125. A Jewish slave-broker offered special payment terms for “negroes” like furniture—payable in one year. Jews Selling Black slaves on layaway!

    Ah yes! The good ol days of “pure capitalism” I hear so much about. Before that evil Federal Reserve came along and ruined everything!

  126. Anon[580] • Disclaimer says:
    @Franklin Ryckaert

    The Barbarians of Europe were civilized by Christianity, not by “slavery”. Similarly Buddhism had a civilizing effect on many peoples of Asia, including the murderous Mongols.

    Anyone outside of Roman authority was deemed a “Barbarian” by the Romans. In fact, it was a common designation for outsiders over a variety of early Kingdoms.

    The term only had to do with any actual lack of civilization by virtue of chance. Nothing about its historical usage implies a lack of civilization. In that way, it has a similar connotation to “Welsh”, from the Germanic “Wal”.

    In fact, the Germanic-Suebi “Barbarians” were the progenitors of the most rigidly civilized and advanced Empire that Europe had known from for about three hundred years in the second millenium. The rest of Europe propelled itself into industrialized civilization by studying their methods, and their military still stands relatively alone in historic context.

    This is not the accomplishment of Barbarians as you use the term. To believe that the “Barbarians” of the Roman period were uncivilized is to lazily believe two millenia old propaganda that does not withstand analysis. The more rational conclusion is that their later military and civilizational accomplishments were (are) the product of thousands of years of honing the (eventually genetically inborn) skills and habits that are at the bedrock of any such success.

    The same group successfully resisted being forced to convert to Christianity by force for a long time. When they finally were, it took the full effort of “civilized” Charlemagne to mass murder them into submission. That successful resistance against Charlemagne is also a reliable sign of civilization.

    The Mongols are a similar case, in the context of your statement about them. To believe that any nation with such military success as they had, in that period, was “uncivilized” is moronic. The logistics alone would require all of the high-level hallmarks of civilization. Not to mention the administration involved. Mass murder was common to all Empires at the time. Trying to balance the morality of that mass murder by implementing, what, reasoning that can only be nihilistic and idiosyncratic? Isn’t rational. Buddhism did nothing to affect any of that, outside of the rear view dreams of middling IQ historical fiction (textbook) writers.

    The Jews murdered every last inhabitant of Cypress at one point in time, and posed a great continuing danger to Rome. They were Barbarians, but not uncivilized.

  127. @Beachcolonist

    No sense in trying to reason with most of these types. They’re programmed to call anyone who criticizes their capitalist overlords bolsheviks, communists, or marxists, sometimes all three in the same sentence. Glenn Beck, John Hagee and Fox News have them trained well.

    To them all Jews are communists. Theres never been a Jewish capitalist ever. Everything they hate about capitalism is communism. Everything bad is marxism, and everyone they disagree with is a bolshevik. They seriously believe George Soros is a communist. The Democrats are socialists. Whatever Fox News says.

    Its a cult.

  128. Anon[160] • Disclaimer says:
    @Bookish1

    If anti semitism keeps increasing at the same rate it has these past few years imagine what it will be like 5 or 10 years from now.

    And just think, all that Jews have to do to stop antisemitism and to assure “Never Again” is to

    1. pledge allegiance to the national sanctity of their host nations,

    2. recognize the native majority as primary inheritors of that nation,

    3. stop working to gain power as a singularly separate minority within their host nations

    (ie: start operating as members of their host nations rather than as a separate nation within their host nation’s borders) and

    4. quit support for international communism.

    What are our chances that the Jews will do what it takes to assure “Never Again”?

    That is, are they serious about “Never Again”?

    Or perhaps only insofar as they can keep gaining from the above four political profit centers?

    • Agree: anarchyst
    • Replies: @Bookish1
  129. geokat62 says:
    @Corvinus

    Louis Farrakhan once made an absurd claim that 75% of slaves were held by Jews.

    Corvy, Corvy, Corvy, still pumping your propaganda I see.

    How many times do I have to come along and clean up the poop you leave behind?

    You know very well that LF misspoke when he quoted that 75% of slaves were held by Jews.

    According to the work of two Jewish demographers, Lee Soltow and Ira Rosenwaike, twice as many Jews (75%) were slaveholders compared to white slaveholders (36%).

    In order to assess such a claim, one must resort to details. Martin’s purported actuality [the 75% statistic] is wrong on its face if applied to the “white population” of the United States “as a whole,” because in 1830 only a handful of white northerners still owned slaves.

    No, the 75% figure did not apply to the “white population” of the United States “as a whole.”
    The studies conducted by Soltow and Rosenwaike were limited to 10 or so states that still practiced slavery in the 1830s. So, their two studies were done on an apples to apples basis. As a result, the 75% figure is valid.

    Now, why don’t you do us all a favour and fly away like a good little bird?

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  130. Anon[183] • Disclaimer says:
    @redmudhooch

    No. I call anyone a communist who chooses to falsely see politics through an economic rather than a cultural lens. That perspective being the victory of communism, whether the lens is a capitalist or a socialist one. Which is why both capitalists and communists converge at their Jewish ideological core to attack the culture of non-Jews.

    Fulfillment of political goals is always the aim, not method itself (capitalism, socialism, etc). Only the low IQ set and autistes get emotional about method. The “muh constitushin” meme image of a white lad surrounded by pickaninnies speaks well to the fallacy of focusing on method. If I could inject one thought virus into the camp of my enemy, it would be for them to focus on method rather than desired results.

    The desired result of Jews, per the explicit statements in their Torah, is the destruction of all other nations and world domination. Mass genocide of non-Jews is to be a part of that”purifying” process, with any survivors existing only as slaves (see the semi-recent statements of leading Halachic authority and Rabbi: Ovadia Yosef).

    All political power is rooted close, effective cooperation between individuals. This cooperation is rooted in culture that breeds a socially rooted community. This begins in race. Which is why Judaism, its communism, and its capitalism attack White race and culture (broadly speaking).

    The above is an education you don’t deserve. But basic (politically clueless) rants on this board, such as yours, are annoying to a degree precisely because they don’t fit in here. You can debate, but not with the assumption of wrong premise. For that, you may want to try the Glenn Beck forum instead.

    • Replies: @SaneClownPosse
  131. geokat62 says:

    Since the ADL is fond of recommending books during Black History Month, I suggest they recommend the Nation of Islam’s best seller, The Secret Relationship Between Blacks and Jews.

    • Replies: @Anon
  132. anon_382 says:
    @anarchyst

    jews wont be the ones paying, you will

  133. @redmudhooch

    …To them all Jews are communists. Theres never been a Jewish capitalist ever.

    We are all commenting on the website of a Jewish capitalist, a fact of which regulars here at the Unz Review are fully aware — and appreciative.

    So much for your boilerplate hasbara talking points.

  134. @Wally

    Jews also owned the ships used in the three way trade.
    Jews provided the financial services, loans, insurance, etc.

    I was searching on “rice negroes” and located these two gems of entrepreneurship.

    https://repository.duke.edu/dc/eaa/B0317
    https://repository.duke.edu/dc/eaa/B0321

    Duke U. in a collection noted as:
    Digital Collection:
    Emergence of Advertising in America: 1850-1920
    Two bills announcing auctions of slaves.

    “CONDITIONS:- One-third Cash.Balance by Bond, payable in two equal annual payments with interest, payable annually from day of sale, to be secured by a mortgage of the property, and approved personal security.”

    The first link was one-half Cash with same payment terms splitting the balance in two annual payments, with interest accruing from day of sale. No mention of the interest rate or compounding.

    The term “mortgage of the property”, same as for cotton, wool, rubber, land, etc. “Just business.”

    14 year old female suggested utility as “house girl”.
    15 year old female suggested utility as “3-4 prime girl”.

    I get what the term “prime field hand” probably means. “Prime girl” I could imagine, but I don’t want to do that.
    I tried searching for “3-4 hand” and “3-4 prime girl”. No results on the world wide web relating to their usage in the slave trade. History that fell down a memory hole.

    The slave traders [Just another commodity, to trade for profit.] were nice enough to not split a family, selling them as a lot.

    The children, even infants, counted as slaves in the total of slaves to be sold off.

    Modern day, they would sterilize the slaves, same as selling sterile GMO seeds. Future repeat business.

    Another reason that I was bounced from ZeroHedge, was that I dared to mention the involvement of Jews in each phase of the slave trade. The financier providing funds for the ships to set sail, to the funds for the buyer in Africa, to the auction houses, and the landowners in the New World.

    It was Jews all the way down.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
    , @anon_382
  135. @Anon

    slavery reparations

    Slavery reparations make no sense in relation to blacks. If indeed blacks were a people of great civilization who’d been robbed and forced into bondage, one could argue for reparations.

    But blacks were a bunch of wild savages with no written language and no wheel. Via slavery, they were transported to the most advanced civilization on Earth. Thanks to contact with whites, blacks gained so much and then some.

    If anything, blacks should be tribute to whites for bringing them to the First World.

    After all, blacks in America don’t move to Africa. Rather, blacks in Africa try to move to the West.

  136. “Sulwe by Lupita Nyong’o”
    Wow, an apostrophe in her name. Thats extra exotic. Bonus diversity point.

    Sulwe is a children’s fiction picture book by actress Lupita Nyong’o. It follows the story of a young girl who wishes for her dark skin to be lighter. The story is ultimately about colorism and learning to love oneself, no matter one’s skin tone.

    >Decries ‘colorism’.
    >Writes low quality childrens book that no one would want to read or buy but for her being a black author and the book being about racism.

    She should try legally changing her name to “Lucy Nelson” and put a blond woman’s picture in her facebook profile and see how much success she would have as a writer.

  137. @Anon

    The son of a wealthy family of Jews, Karl Marx, who married into the Rothschild family, wrote “The Communist Manifesto”.
    Think about that. Does that make sense?

    Mark’s defined only two groups, Bourgeoisie and Proletariat. Marx conveniently leaves out the 0.0001%, the ultra wealthy families, that are above it all, the Aristocracy. This is the class that benefited from Marx pitting the Middle Class against the Working Class. Keep them fighting between themselves. Keep their anger away from the real targets.

    Think about that until 1917, there had been no “Communist” revolutions. Karl Marx argued against actually revolting, whenever the “True Believers” were energized to revolt.

    Communism is a product of Intelligence, not the good kind of intelligence, the Mossad/CIA kind.
    Capitalism is a creation of Jewish Finance.
    Contrived binary choices.
    Both devalue the Individual Man’s efforts.

    • Replies: @Mustapha Mond
  138. Corvinus says:
    @Priss Factor

    “But blacks were a bunch of wild savages with no written language and no wheel.”

    Except they had a vibrant oral tradition and required no wheel to move their goods and peoples.

    “Via slavery, they were transported to the most advanced civilization on Earth.”

    Against their will.

    “Thanks to contact with whites, blacks gained so much and then some.”

    No thanks to whites, their individual liberty was shredded.

    You’re really not that bright.

    • Replies: @Nalca
    , @Anonymous
  139. Corvinus says:
    @SaneClownPosse

    “Another reason that I was bounced from ZeroHedge, was that I dared to mention the involvement of Jews in each phase of the slave trade. The financier providing funds for the ships to set sail, to the funds for the buyer in Africa, to the auction houses, and the landowners in the New World. It was Jews all the way down.”

    No, you are just peddling falsehoods. Comment 34 sets you straight.

    • Disagree: Urban Moving
  140. @anon_382

    That says more about you than Jews or Irishmen! Ha you have me laughing out loud, thanks!

    • Replies: @anon_382
  141. Corvinus says:
    @geokat62

    LOL, you just can’t bring yourself to admit you were taken to the historical woodshed. Citing sources is one thing. Citing them accurately and consistently throughout one’s work and in the proper context is another. Wintrop Jordan noted the discrepancies. The basic truth is that Professor Martin cited several Jewish sources, but neglected to offer the proper context to said sources, when creating his own narrative that several prominent white and black historians took umbrage to.

    https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/1995/09/slavery-and-the-jews/376462/

    In order to assess such a claim, one must resort to details. Martin’s purported actuality is wrong on its face if applied to the “white population” of the United States “as a whole,” because in 1830 only a handful of white northerners still owned slaves. Jews were concentrated in the North, and they constituted a very small minority there. Even if the statement is taken as applying only to the states in the American South that had not adopted gradual emancipation laws, it remains badly flawed. A careful and honest footnote in The Secret Relationship reveals that “Jewish scholars” had concluded that Jews in the South lived mostly in towns and cities. Neither this book nor Martin’s explains the significance of this fact. In actuality, slave ownership was much more common in southern urban areas than in the southern countryside. The relatively high proportion of Jewish slaveholding was a function of the concentration of Jews in cities and towns, not of their descent or religion. It is also the case that urban slaveholders of whatever background owned fewer slaves on average than rural slaveholders, including those on large plantations. Thus the proportion of slaveholders has never been an accurate measure of the social or economic importance of slaveholding, unless it is assessed on a broadly regional or state-by-state basis. In this instance, as in so many others, the statistical data do not stand up and cry out their own true significance.

    Remember, it was YOU who had stated that it is “relatively trivial thing to challenge a particular statistic ( i.e., 70%), as there are a number of assumptions upon which this statistic is based that are easily assailable”.

    Recall that the proportion of slaveholders has never been an accurate measure of the social or economic importance of slaveholding, unless it is assessed on a broadly regional or state-by-state basis. Besides, purchasing slaves could be a sign of one’s **ethnic display of superiority and/or represent a family’s wealth**. So if we want to make an accurate comparison, we would have to compare Jews and ALL other ethnic groups who owned slaves and account for what was the driving force**.

    Remember, Jacob Rader Marcus clearly stated that”over 75 percent of all Jewish families in Charleston, Richmond, and Savannah owned slaves, employed as domestic servants; almost 40 percent of all Jewish households in the United States owned one slave or more” (United States Jewry, 1776-1985, pg. 585). Professor Martin failed to specifically note that Jew slavery ownership was concentrated in southern cities.

    Why did Martin craft a narrative that is other than accurate? One must take into consideration that the 1830 census looked at households who had slaves. What definition was used here? Did Marcus and Rosenwaite employ the same one? Recall also that religion and slaveholder did NOT appear until the 1860 census. One could delve deeper and more accurately into the extent of Jewish slavery in the South. Were Jews typical or atypical compared to (insert ethnic group or religious group here)? Due to a lack of data on religion, it is difficult to make an exact estimate of the percentage of southern Jews who owned slaves, but the best estimates show that they were fairly similar to their Christian neighbors in this regard. Furthermore, their statistics only accounts for ONE difference—Jewish versus non-Jewish. We know that poorer people were less likely to own slaves than wealthier families. How did the population of southern Jews compare to non-Jewish in this regard?

    So according to Martin, Jews were more than twice as likely, on a percentage basis, to own slaves. Compared to who? Non-Jewish people? Those of English descent or Scots-Irish? In urban areas? In rural areas? Again, perspective matters here. What about raw numbers? Is it fair to say that more whites than Jews owned slaves? Controlled the slave trade? Were plantation owners in greater numbers? Treated their slaves more harshly? Is the purchasing slaves a sign of one’s ethnic display of superiority, does it represent a family’s wealth, or both? Is this attitude similar or different compared to non-Jews–that is, what about those with English, Scots-Irish, or Welsh ancestry who lived in those cities and owned slaves? How and why?

    MANY questions that need to be answered by Martin…and yourself.

    • Troll: YetAnotherAnon
    • Replies: @geokat62
  142. @SaneClownPosse

    Please correct me if I am wrong here, but wasn’t it Marx himself who was related to the Rothschilds via his descent from the common ancestor “Barent-Cohen” of Amsterdam? (See here: http://archives.balliol.ox.ac.uk/Modern%20Papers/gelles/2018RothschildMarx.pdf)

    His wife was Jenny von Westphalen, who was of noble lineage, but was not Jewish, at least to my knowledge (see here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jenny_von_Westphalen)

    Again, please correct me if I am wrong. I don’t mind being proven wrong, as it allows me to gain better insights and knowledge, rather than clinging to erroneous beliefs out of ego protection.

    “Think about that until 1917, there had been no “Communist” revolutions. Karl Marx argued against actually revolting, whenever the “True Believers” were energized to revolt.”

    I studied Marxism in college (long ago!), and I remember quite well being puzzled why he repeatedly argued against moving forward with a worker’s revolution, when it seemed that so many factors were ripe and ready for exactly that. Some have argued that he was really an infil-traitor, who was there to stall and impede the revolution on behalf of the banksters, of which he had common ancestry, rather than an actual advocate for the workers. I do not claim to have any insight or knowledge that would cause me to decide decisively, one way or the other, about the truth of such claims. But despite studying the arguments Marx presented for his position, his repeated dissuading of the leaders of the IWA from calling for a world-wide worker’s revolt when it seemed such an obviously propitious time for same, was always quite puzzling to me……..

  143. anon_382 says:
    @SaneClownPosse

    Jews also owned the ships used in the three way trade.
    Jews provided the financial services, loans, insurance, etc.

    also rum was an important part of the triangular trade

    who owned the rum distilleries?

    • Replies: @9/11 Inside job
  144. @Anon

    Deception is fundamental to Judaism. If a Jew said it prima facie it’s a lie. And it’s not even just lying to those subhumans, the non-Jews. Israel Shahak makes it clear that lying to God is fundamental to Judaism!

  145. @Pat Kittle

    Hollywood’s few slave era movies invisibilize jews who were inordinately involved — look at 12 Years a Slave about a re-captured freed slave sent back to the plantation. Yeah, a black director made the film but would it have been made if it referenced who those bounty hunters were working for?

    • Replies: @Bookish1
  146. The Tony Martin harassment case is a story unto itself as is the overall organized censorship that has sought to clamp down on this very interesting page in history. Another example of egregious ADL overreach.

    Meanwhile, during this period my ancestors were working a plow and draft horse where the winters are six months long. So I really do not relate to some general claim for reparations where I am both supposed to feel guilty and shell out tax dollars as I once did lunch money.

    But perhaps that is the wrong perspective. Because with a couple reforms, e.g. dismantling the Federal Reserve, and nationalizing (only temporarily) the mass media conglomerates, which would curiously pull a lot of wealth and undue influence away from Jews, there would be a lot available for general jubilee where Americans with some African descent are given a portion of these assets. These could be labelled or at least considered “reparations”.

    Is that such a high price to pay for their alliance to help break the stranglehold and rebuild America? Just a thought.

    I leave you with this lecture by Michael Hoffman to NOI. He gets along famously with Louis Farrakhan. Most of Michael’s stuff got scrubbed off YouTube last year. That was very disturbing; he is one of my favorite firebrands on these matters.

    • Replies: @ben sampson
  147. @Priss Factor

    “…But blacks were a bunch of wild savages with no written language and no wheel…”

    Not entirely. Read Wikipedia : Sahelian kingdoms and : African empires.

    • Replies: @Priss Factor
  148. geokat62 says:
    @Corvinus

    So according to Martin, Jews were more than twice as likely, on a percentage basis, to own slaves.

    LOL. You keep saying “according to Martin.”
    Let me try to make this real simple for you. Tony Martin was a Black History professor, not a demographer. Got it?

    He did not do any of the work to develope the statistic that twice as many Jewish households (75%) owned slaves compared to white households (36%) in the 1830s. No, that work was done by two Jewish demographers who were experts in their field, so expert, in fact, that no other demographer, Jewish or goy, has refuted their analysis.

    The only sin Prof. Tony Martin committed was to cite their original work!

    MANY questions that need to be answered by Martin…and yourself.

    LOL, there are NO questions that need to be answered, as the statistic Prof. Martin quoted was a rather simple one: according to the work of two Jewish demographers, Lee Soltow and Ira Rosenwaike, twice as many Jewish households (75%) were slaveholders compared to white households (36%) in the 1830s.

    You can’t get any more straightforward than that, Corvy… no matter how convoluted you try to make it.

    Live with it!

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  149. Bookish1 says:
    @Anon

    If they did all those things they wouldn’t be jews. A leapord doesn’t change its spots.

  150. Bookish1 says:
    @Cycling Goddess

    How about the movie ‘Roots’? An anti white piece of propaganda. Not anti jewish..

  151. @thotmonger

    love this post! very good idea

  152. anon_382 says:
    @Beachcolonist

    maybe in your twisted mind

    idiots laugh easily

  153. Nalca says:
    @Corvinus

    Actually, it was blacks who enslaved blacks, not whites. Then, they were sold by blacks to others peoples.
    And Muslims enslaved them too (or tried), before whites.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  154. Corvinus says:
    @geokat62

    “LOL. You keep saying “according to Martin.””

    Which is entirely accurate, since he is making the charges.

    “Tony Martin was a Black History professor, not a demographer. Got it?”

    LOL, you do realize that historians use demographics and employ For heaven’s sake, he used U.S. Census and Demographic information! So are you implying that was not an expert in the study of statistics relating to the changing structure of human populations, and that his findings as a result of his research in this field is flawed?

    “He did not do any of the work to develop the statistic that twice as many Jewish households (75%) owned slaves compared to white households (36%) in the 1830s.”

    Except that percentage was not properly given the context and then used to perpetuate a falsehood based on the statistics. Louis Farrakhan claimed that “75 percent of the slaves owned in the South were owned by Jewish slaveholders.” Farrakhan also claimed Harold Brackman’s 1977 dissertation for the University of California, Los Angeles, on the history of black-Jewish relations supported his claims in “The Secret Relationship.” Brackman refuted his dissertation supported any of Farrakhan’s conclusions in a letter to the New York Times, “Jews Had Negligible Role in Slave Trade.” Brackman also claimed the role Jewish merchants played in the Atlantic Slave Trade was marginal, citing Jacob Rader Marcus, who argued the role played by Jewish merchants accounted for “considerably less than 2 percent” of the traffic. Brackman further claimed it was impossible for 75% of the slaves in the South to be owned by Jewish slave owners: “In 1860, there were about 15,000 Southern Jews and 4 million slaves. If 3 million (75 percent) were so owned, this would mean 200 slaves for every Jewish man, woman and child, or 1,000 slaves for every Jewish head of household. Jews owned only a fraction of 1 percent — thousands, not millions — of the enslaved population.” Winthrop D. Jordan’s article in the Atlantic, “Slavery and the Jews,” also refuted Farrakhan’s claims.

    Per usual, the questions that I posed you conveniently ignore, as they are entirely relevant to the discussion.

    Take into account this take on Professor Martin’s work:
    https://www.tabletmag.com/jewish-arts-and-culture/books/137476/slave-trade-black-muslim

    The Secret Relationship alleges that Jews were over-represented in the slave trade, but it goes about doing so in a funny way. For the author, the fact that Jews participated at all is tantamount to proof that without Jewish money and Jewish traders, the entire industry would have collapsed. For example, the book’s anonymous author cites the fact that in 1774, the Jews of Jamaica owned 310 slaves, which, horrific as it is, is only 4 percent of the total slave population in Jamaica at that time (7,424). A grand total of 12 Jews owned plantations, and yet this doesn’t stop the author from concluding that Jews dominated the trade.

    Faber found during his more recent scholarly research with British Naval Office records that in 18th-century Britain, Jews actually were not heavily invested in the trading part of the slave trade. “Overwhelmingly,” Faber said, “Jewish merchants and shippers were not involved at all; they represent a minuscule portion of owners of ships.” While Jews did own slaves, he found, “their ownership was directly proportionate to their numbers.” Both were about 18 percent. The two companies with slaving ventures had small numbers of Jews among their owners: The Royal Africa Company had none until 1712, and the South Sea Company always had a handful of Jews, though interestingly, “those Jews were more likely than non-Jews to invest heavily,” Faber says.

    “The numbers just aren’t there to support the view,” said Faber. “Jews were involved, but to an insignificant degree. That doesn’t absolve them of that guilt, but everyone made money off African slaves: Arabs, Europeans, Africans,” he said. “And there was no attempt to deny it—the Nation of Islam used Jewish sources.”

    as well as…

    Much of the historical evidence regarding alleged Jewish or New Christian involvement in the slave system was biased by deliberate Spanish efforts to blame Jewish refugees for fostering Dutch commercial expansion at the expense of Spain. Given this long history of conspiratorial fantasy and collective scapegoating, a selective search for Jewish slave traders becomes inherently anti-Semitic unless one keeps in view the larger context and the very marginal place of Jews in the history of the overall system. It is easy enough to point to a few Jewish slave traders in Amsterdam, Bordeaux, or Newport, Rhode Island. But far from suggesting that Jews constituted a major force behind the exploitation of Africa, closer investigation shows that these were highly exceptional merchants, far outnumbered by thousands of Catholics and Protestants who flocked to share in the great bonanza.

    To keep matters in perspective, we should note that in the American South, in 1830, there were only 120 Jews among the 45,000 slaveholders owning twenty or more slaves and only twenty Jews among the 12,000 slaveholders owning fifty or more slaves. Even if each member of this Jewish slaveholding elite had owned 714 slaves—a ridiculously high figure in the American South—the total number would only equal the 100,000 slaves owned by Black and colored planters in St. Domingue in 1789, on the eve of the Haitian Revolution.

    • Disagree: thotmonger
    • Replies: @geokat62
  155. Corvinus says:
    @Nalca

    “Actually, it was blacks who enslaved blacks, not whites.”

    You mean it was blacks and whites who enslaved blacks. And Muslims were also involved. Would you not agree that regardless of who was involved that it was brutal and inhumane?

    • Troll: YetAnotherAnon
  156. @Franklin Ryckaert

    Not entirely. Read Wikipedia : Sahelian kingdoms and : African empires.

    They paled next to European and Asian civilizations.

    Also, slaves weren’t taken from African civilizations. Instead, relatively advanced African kingdoms captured savage oogity-boogity blacks and sold them to whites. Under white rule, these oogity-boogity blacks gained and achieved so much more than blacks of African kingdoms. In other words, thanks to white rule, blacks who’d been captured and sold by other blacks did better than those blacks(who remained ‘free’).

  157. Anonymous[717] • Disclaimer says:
    @Corvinus

    This here is the truth about Affirmative Action and Black History.

    https://burritocatzer.blogspot.com/2015/06/the-truth-about-affirmative-action.html

  158. @Nonny Mouse

    The “Semitic” question is completely pointless. It is only an expression coined by Wilhelm Marr who was himself a Jew and an operative of the Zionists. You don’t have to be a Semite to be a Jew. But as it happens, the Sephardics, as the name implies, were originally Phoenicians, and Phoenicians are Semites. They could have been something else. Semite or not Semite is not the question and never was. Grow up.

    • Replies: @Nonny Mouse
  159. geokat62 says:
    @Corvinus

    Face facts, Corvy. Twice as many Jewish households owned slaves (75%) than white households (36%). The evidence is irrefutable.

    No amount of dissembling or contextualizing can change it.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  160. so many here going on and on around the silly argument about slavery civilizing Africans, hepling Blacks… and Blacks were selling each other etc…. as if somehow that absolves whites of blame for enslaving africans.

    I dont see that it does!

    whites came up with idea of African slavery, organized the business, put chains on africans herded them on board, received them wherever, worked them to death, sterilized them to keep the slave trade market going… and kept it going for some centuries.

    the developed racial apartheid in the americas..horrific racism to keep the slaves and freedmen down.

    no civilizing of Black people was at all intended by slavery, or was such official policy of any and all the slaving white nations. that was not the point at all at any time during the slave trade, slavery.. in the west. and when it was over the ‘freed’ slaves were let loose to fend for themslves period.

    it was wrong, criminal to do all of that even if the oportunity begged and the profit flowed like a river. it was criminal and against god and nature.  

    civilized christians of all people should have known that and by their god should have desisted.  the slave trade/slavery was total, comprehensive exploitation and genocide of a people.  there was no intent to civilise the enslaved, only to exploit and profit all along the way.

    white people including Jews are guilty as charged since Columbus… and must compensate for their crimes. forget all the mitigative nonsense. it does not cut against the truth

    • Replies: @Nonny Mouse
    , @anon_382
    , @Nalca
  161. @ploni almoni

    It wasn’t coined by him. I downloaded the first book of his that it was attributed to and the word doesn’t appear. I think you are saying it quickly spread by radio and TV at the time and that’s why it was in wide use in French during the Dreyfus Affair.

    Most likely it appeared everywhere when Protestantism made everyone literate but usually the Bible was the only book in the house. That Abraham is a descendant of Shem appears very early. They all knew the Jews of the Bible were Semites and they knew nothing else, no post-biblical history. Natural evolution of a word at the same time everywhere.

    • Replies: @Nonny Mouse
  162. Anon[211] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anon

    Blacks had an irrational Hate for the Jews in the light of the fact that Jews fought for Black rights when no one else did.

    I hope you are spoofing the beliefs of the student “advisor,” there. I hope you understand that many whites were supporting black Civil Rights, even funding it. I hope that the sanitized, Judaized version of history has not proceeded to such a point that literally the only good whites in existence are Jews.

  163. @The Plutonium Kid

    It didn’t need fixing.

    Perhaps not, but it certainly needed completion, which I graciously provided for you:

    No one owes the Jews anything. So far as I can tell, the Jews in countries worldwide were the greatest war-mongering civilization in all of human history, and if that isn’t enough, their endless military aggression and criminality against non-Jews surely squares any debt that the rest of the world may owe them.

    • Replies: @anon_382
  164. @Nonny Mouse

    Sorry, got that wrong. Yes, Marr keeps calling Jews Semites. The word “anti-Semitism”, accented Frence version, was in wide use in France months later, but wasn’t used by Marr till he put it in the title of a later book. But you can’t attribute the invention of the word to him simply because other use isn’t on the record.

  165. @ben sampson

    “Compensate”, an eye for an eye, is very Jewish. The Christian word is “forgive.” To want to exact retribution from the descendants of the culprits is to validate fraud, and make historic conflict never-ending.

    • Replies: @ben sampson
  166. @Just passing through

    Agreed. If you gave everyone in America an equal share of wealth, in a few months things would look just like they do today.

    • Disagree: thotmonger
  167. @anon_382

    Aaron Lopez , a Sephardic Jew , became one of the wealthiest men in the Colonies from his ownership of slave ships and his fianancing of the triangular trade in 18th century Newport , Rhode Island. He financed the building of the Touro Synagogue and part of his extensive business interests included the distilling of rum. see:

    peoplepill.com :”Aaron Lopez: American businessman ” and my comment #56 above .

  168. @Nonny Mouse

    “Now they whinge ”

    The first time I saw that word in print, I thought it was a misspelling of whine. It does seem to mean the same thing as ‘whine’. Apparently, it’s a thing, or a kind of thing, since so many people use it. Is it a British thing, or what?

    • Replies: @BDS Always
  169. @redmudhooch

    “To them all Jews are communists.”

    No, you don’t get it. What happens is that all joos get lumped together as eevul. See, there are two kinds of joos: eevull joos and regyoulah joos. The eevull joos do all the bad stuff while the regyoulah joos are…well, regyoulah. They just pride themselves on nevah paying retail, and that kind of thing.

    See, eevull joos don’t talk like Hoischel and Oiving from 37th street. They don’t say “oy vey” or “your poor mothah”, the way regyoulah joos do. It’s easy to tell the difference, but some people can’t be bothered. It’s half antisemitism over there already.

  170. @Rational

    I wonder if a Jewish Power will back reparations to the blacks and then shift the burden to middle and working class gentile whites by using the usual legal tax scams

    • Replies: @Flubber
  171. @Nonny Mouse

    yoiu have not read my mind successfully. dont let the Ben Sampson fool you..I am not Jewish.

    and I am not looking for a white eye for this . who is talking about exacting retribution in some primitive sense?

    what is this some kind of game to allow white people to walk free with all the profits? what forgiveness are you talking about?

    what is the implication here..the forgiveness you talking about..in the relgious sense? isnt it a bit late for that relative to you white people?. you havr to see truth, accept truth and act in correction!
    what forgiveness are you talking about?

    have white people lived in such a manner relative to Black people, at home and in the world post slavery, that warrants such as you suggest or request..forgiveness?

    what is this ‘forgiveness you talking about?

    hahahahahahahaha! you are sweet! your implication is irrelevant here. a crime has been committed that warrants a case before judges to cosider the evidence and make judgment

    forgiveness has nothng to do with it in that sense. if you want the kind of forviveness you appear to imply sure! you do not have to ask… I forgive you..totally. but for the crime in question and my time and lives over centuries, compensation is necessary. you must be judged, assessed and pay accordingly

    and as for historic conflict..that is for white people to end, not me..

    I did nto do anything to white people, committed no crime, did not attack white peple, did nothing to them..to you. its all you.

    whatever is long term you bring it, by refusal to admit your crime, continuation of your crime by the way you live to this very day relative to me..your racism. exploitation, regime changes, supression of Black independence and efforts to earn collective prosperity..the on-going utter and depraved corruption, control, rape and exploitation of Black people and their nations ….

    all of that is you! not me. to end historic conflict is to stop creating it by your continuing rapacious, devilish behavior in the world, pay reparations and live like a good beighbor!

  172. This is a complicated issue. Remember that slavery was long acceptable to everyone including black Africans. After all the African chiefs sold their black captives from the tribal wars to the slave traders, right? What interests me about this issue today is the way the Jews are interpreting Jewish history in a way that is as black friendly as they can make it. Of course this makes sense since Jewish Power is importing blacks to the west to confound Aryan power but do not want to weaken their own. Umass Social Justice School of Education Dept(can you believe there is such a thing?) founder = one Maurianne Adams – has published material which I have heard much overestimates the Jewish role in abolitionism and much underestimates the Jewish role in slave trading and the planter economy. The book is “Strangers and Neighbors: Relations Between Blacks and Jews in the United States” and Adams is, I believe, a Jew. I cannot claim to have read this volume yet. However it is clear that the Jews, after centuries of pretending to be white, are now trying to pass as, if not black, mulatoish. We goyim, white and black, should be aware.

    • Replies: @ben sampson
  173. mario964 says:

    Black Civilization

    From the reply of ADAHOONZOU, KING OF DAHOMY to Mr. Lionel Abson who borught with him some pamphlets for and against the abolition of slave traffic.

    REMARKABLE SPEECH OF ADAHOONZOU, KING OF DAHOMY,
    ON HEARING WHAT WAS PASSING IN ENGLAND RESPECTING THE SLAVE-TRADE

    ……In the name of my ancestors and myself I aver, that no Dahoman ever embarked in war merely for the sake of procuring wherewithal to purchase your commodities. I, who have not been long master of this country, have, without thinking of the market, killed many thousands, and I shall kill many thousands more. When policy or justice requires that men be put to death, neither silk, nor coral, nor brandy, nor cowries, can be accepted as substitutes for the blood that ought to be spilt for example sake: besides, if white men chuse to remain at home, and no longer visit this country for the same purpose that has usually brought them hither, will black men cease to make war? I answer, by no means; and if there be no ships to receive their captives, what will become of them? I answer, for you, they will be put to death.
    We do, indeed, sell to the white men a part of our prisoners, and we have a right so to do. Are not all prisoners at the disposal of their captors? and are we to blame, if we send delinquents to a far country?
    You have seen me kill many men at the Customs[*]; and you have often observed delinquents at Grigwhee, and others of my provinces, tied, and sent up to me. I kill them, but do I ever insist on being paid for them? Some heads I order to be placed at my door, others to be strewed about the market-place, that people may stumble upon them, when they little expect such a sight. This gives a grandeur to my Customs[*], far beyond the display of fine things which I buy; this makes my enemies fear me, and gives me such a name in the Bush. Besides, if I neglect this indispensable duty, would my ancestors suffer me to live? would they not trouble me day and night, and say, that I sent nobody to serve them? that I was only solicitous about my own name, and forgetful of my ancestors? White men are not acquainted with these circumstances; but I now tell you, that you may hear, and know, and inform your countrymen, why Customs[*] are made, and will be made, as long as black men continue to possess their own country: the few that can be spared from this necessary celebration, we sell to the white men; and happy, no doubt, are such, when they find themselves on the path for Grigwhee, to be disposed of to the Europeans—“We shall still drink water†,” say they to themselves; “white men will not kill us; and we may even avoid punishment, by serving our new masters with fidelity.”

    History of Dahomy by Archibald Dalzel. 1793
    Underlying source: “collected from the communications of” Lionel Abson,
    http://www.gutenberg.org/files/37240/37240-h/nos93_104.html

    A mission to Gelele, king of Dahome by Richard Francis Burton. 1864
    https://archive.org/details/cu31924026515159/page/n3/mode/2up
    https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k103776v/texteBrut

    [*] Wikipedia. Annual Customs of Dahomey (xwetanu or huetanu in Fon i.e. “yearly head business”) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Annual_Customs_of_Dahomey

    • Replies: @96.1234
  174. @Achilles Wannabe

    whatever slavery Africans carried out on the continent had no relevance to the western slavery white europe developed. white europe conceived of a business that required slaves for the purpose of their exploitation as free labor to make massive profits…capitalist slavery that expanded to the take-over of both Africa and the America.

    Africans created nothing of the sort. african slavery was some sort of traditional cultural thing that had codified ways of treatment of slaves, that ensured everything about the slaves themselves, that protected them, included them in the life, and ensured then good lives. African slavery was no long term savage exploitative system like Europe created.

    if Europe bought slaves from Africans who willingly sold some at the start, how did that happen? that story should be instrutive!

    but soon Europe was dominating Africans, raiding and capturing slaves on the Afican contenent. europe took over, captured it.. the whole continent over time and developed the whole slavery business..imposed all manner of racism and exploitation of the african continent.

    and what europe also did was to steal African history,make it its own while hiding away the proof, destroying much of it too…the historical evidence of African history from the general knowledge of the ordinary people of the world. in the vacumm created by eliminating african history as a factor of world knowledge europe has inserted lies about Africa and about what Europe claims for itself out of African creation and history

    Africa was no uncivilized location and space. Africa has been around a long time..longer than all other peoples and created a whole lot that became great contributions to european development..stolen by europe and used by the euro elites for themslves.. which benefited all of europe too.

    the Jews are white people and they profited off African conquest and slavery..and the conquest of the americas in addition…nd the development of western capitalism. the Jews are guilty of crimes against Africa, and they are guilty of crimes against the whole world…and must pay for all of it inclduing their crimes against Africa.. the Jews can play whatever surface game they want to, sidling up to Africans and playing their friend. but I dont know any Africans fooled. no doubt there are some but I dont know any.

    the Jews in reality are palying a capitalist game and that means their movement no matter how it lloks to the contrary are in thir exclusive favor and prupose. the Jews are working in their collective capitalist interest iwhihc interest is opposed to the interest of ordinary people of the whole world on all levels of existence.

    the Jews are not attacking white american power as you claim. the Jews are american white power themselves.. are in fact contiguous with capitalism. so why would they attack themselves and their collective capitalist interests?

    the Jews are in fact dividing and separating ordinary people, each group from the other because they are all united as a working class, a massive ordinary class of people who interest is jobs but must not become collectively conscious of that and all it means for them in the world. but the working class will soon be unable to guarantee itself anythng at all in life, if as automation, robotization, AI comes fully on stream. at that point the capitalists wont need people anymore, the working class.. and would have the robots and AI to protect themselves

    at this point it is crucial to Jewish/Capitalist/white power – all one and the same – to make sure that ordinary people do not collectivise in full awareness of the truth of social reality and our collective dire state of existence – ordianry people: while the capitalists get technological advance on stream as fast as they can, so that they they can control us by that. that is when the situation will get truly dire for us the ordianry people of the world

    right now the prevention of revolutionary uprising is the key to capitalist interest making sure the working classes cannot collectivise and attack capitalism, revolutionizing american/western society. that is why the deluge of imigrants, and the retrenchment of long established national working classes. immigrants wont strike, are at low social levels and do not have a clue about revolutonary change generated by working classes… even about basic trade union activity to achieve working class benefits as they go

    • Replies: @Achilles Wannabe
  175. @Brás Cubas

    The argument you make is correct, and is part of the set of arguments made by Hasnas in “The Obviousness of Anarchy“; all societues must commence without state provision of laws, law enforcement, courts, state-furnished security, and all of the other things that #muhroads dickheads think supposedly can’t exist without a set of parasitic cunts who live off everyone else. The parasitic cunts emerge later (like pus in a wound).

    I highly recommend Hasnas’ essay; as he points out, virtually all of the common law (contract, property, tort, contract) emerged endogenously and outside of formal state structures – to attempt to ensure that conflict was resolved without violence. As such, it was reasonably efficient, because it was flexible.

    Contrast that with legislated (politically-motivated) law, which is promulgated to further the interests of the state or some narrow consistency.

    The Hasnas paper is only about 20 A4 pages: it’s a very good response to fuckwitted arguments about how government is needed to police, defend property, or ameliorate public goods problems or externalities.

    Here it is in PDF

    • Replies: @Kratoklastes
  176. anon_382 says:
    @ben sampson

    so many here going on and on around the silly argument about slavery civilizing Africans, hepling Blacks… and Blacks were selling each other etc…. as if somehow that absolves whites of blame for enslaving africans.

    with a name like ben samstein i cant say i’m surprised

    whites came up with idea of African slavery

    you need to study history, pal

    • Replies: @ben sampson
  177. @Kratoklastes

    contract, property, tort, contract

    Last one should be commercial. The comment edit function is absolute shit on iThings (mostly not Unz’ fault).

  178. anon_382 says:
    @Pat Kittle

    i was listening to Powers + Principalities today and Joe Atwill claimed that the jews killed/murdered all the goyim on Cyprus – 250,000 of them, in Roman times.

    for some reason we never hear about this

    • Replies: @geokat62
    , @Nonny Mouse
  179. @anon_382

    It’s in the record. Ancient Roman author. North African Jews rose up and massacred the non-Jews and it happened at the same time in Cyprus.

    • Agree: Colin Wright
  180. Nalca says:
    @ben sampson

    civilized christians of all people should have known that and by their god should have desisted. the slave trade/slavery was total, comprehensive exploitation and genocide of a people. there was no intent to civilise the enslaved, only to exploit and profit all along the way.

    You don’t genocide peoples you enslave. Dead peoples don’t work. They need to be alive for that.

    white people including Jews are guilty as charged since Columbus… and must compensate for their crimes. forget all the mitigative nonsense. it does not cut against the truth

    How about you go sell yourself as a slave in Africa as a compensation for your ancestor’s crime ?

  181. Corvinus says:
    @geokat62

    “Face facts, Corvy. Twice as many Jewish households owned slaves (75%) than white households (36%). The evidence is irrefutable. No amount of dissembling or contextualizing can change it.”

    I completely understand. You are caught in a corner, and like a caged animal, you lash out when confronted with the truth and mountains of evidence that back up that truth.

    Again, according to Martin, Jews were more than twice as likely, on a percentage basis, to own slaves. Compared to who? Non-Jewish people? Those of English descent or Scots-Irish? In urban areas? In rural areas? Again, perspective matters here. What about raw numbers? Is it fair to say that more whites than Jews owned slaves? Controlled the slave trade? Were plantation owners in greater numbers? Treated their slaves more harshly? Is the purchasing slaves a sign of one’s ethnic display of superiority, does it represent a family’s wealth, or both? Is this attitude similar or different compared to non-Jews–that is, what about those with English, Scots-Irish, or Welsh ancestry who lived in those cities and owned slaves? How and why?

    MANY questions that need to be answered by Martin…and yourself. Why do you avoid them?

  182. @Colin Wright

    Colin had to show up to [email protected], he just can get enough.

    Time to read up on Cicero and Treason.
    Disguising your deep seated self-hatred behind ‘realism’ or ‘materialism’ is pathetic and only becoming of a traitor, a cuck and a sodomite.

  183. @Twodees Partain

    It used in the UK.
    Whinge: Moan, Complain.
    Stop Whinging: Stop Moaning.

    Whinging Bollocks: Moaning Hasbara Nonsense.

    • Replies: @Twodees Partain
  184. @Curmudgeon

    The process was known as ‘devshirme’.
    It was a form of tax to produce a military age boy between say 10-14 years old. The system transformed them into loyal Muslim soldiers. They ate well, sometimes learning to read and advance themselves. At a certain point, Christian’s competed to get their kids into the system. The system was eventually abolished after several centuries.
    The really nasty part of Ottoman slavery was the eunuch system. 80% of those who were castrated by slavers bled out and died so eunuch’s were costly.
    The Arab slavers depopulated the coastal areas of Europe and had to go as far as the Bay of Biscay, at times, to even find slaves. The Black Sea slave trade was fairly profitable. Numbers are pretty hard to arrive at.
    Just look at modern Turks and other parts of the mIddle east and you see a lot of Slavic blood in some of those people. Some of them would be assumed to be a local anywhere in Europe or N. America. I’ve even seen blue-eyed blondes at a local Iraqi restaurant speaking Arabic.

    • Replies: @Anon
  185. @Bookish1

    You mean ‘Jew awareness’.
    Societies need to protect themselves from all predators: traitors, pedophiles, Jews and criminals.
    It is normal and healthy.
    Healthy religions that insist on good conduct (Christianity, Buddhism) are helpful antidotes.
    Globohomo-cultural marxism-lbtbqpedo-pc is part of the Jewish assault on civilization. I hope to see legislation within 5 years or sooner. We have to attack this or be swallowed into the belly of Evil.

  186. @anon_382

    and for you…you need a course in comprehension….
    hahaha

    • Replies: @anon_382
  187. geokat62 says:
    @Corvinus

    Again, according to Martin, Jews were more than twice as likely, on a percentage basis, to own slaves.

    LOL! There you go, again… “according to Martin.”

    It was according to the studies carried out by two Jewish demographers, Soltow and Rosenwaike, who happened to be experts in their field.

    You have issues with their methodology? Take it up with them, not Martin. He has nothing to do with those studies. He was only referencing their startling findings:

    Twice as many (75%) Jewish households owned slaves compared to white households (36%) in the 1830s!

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  188. 96.1234 says:
    @mario964

    HOAX: How does this unlisted “king” of interior Africa write with incisive knowledge of “the nature of whites” and the “nature of blacks,” and with perfect ENGLISH prose? Its source–Archibald Dalzel–took a job in Africa “as he saw it as a way to make money.” He started trading slaves “to add to his salary.” Even back in 1555 John Hawkins was being pressed by the queen to justify the stealing of human beings (so she could be satisfied that “God” would approve) and he commandeered the Talmudic Curse of Ham which proved adequate. Dalzel was not unlike the Portuguese Jewish slave trading half-breeds know as Lancados who set up their slave trading posts on the African coast. Deceptive white historians—and SEVERAL commenters here—are referring to these mulattoes when they say “African tribal leaders sold their own people…” See https://noirg.org/articles/did-african-slave-traders-sell-us-out/

    Today’s corollary is the never challenged or investigated claim that any foreign (read non-white) leader who has some measure of oil beneath his feet is “killing his own people” who must be saved by 1) the Pentagon, then immediately 2) by ExxonMobil.

    • Replies: @Twodees Partain
    , @mario964
  189. 96.1234 says:
    @Corvinus

    SUPPRESSION OF NEGRO REVOLTS BY THE JEWS OF SURINAM

    In Surinam, the Jews were heavy buyers in the African slave markets, and in 1755 even the synagogue purchased 14 slaves from Jewish slave dealer, A. Perera. The synagogue bought a plantation called “Nahamu” (Comfort ye) with its 112 slaves.

    Thousands of enslaved Africans labored for the Jewish plantation masters in the cruelest, most inhuman conditions.

    When the Africans organized to seek their God-given freedom, the Jews were leaders in the suppression of these revolts. From 1690 to 1722, writes historian Cecil Roth, the revolts “were largely directed against them, as being the greatest slave-holders of the region.”

    B’nai B’rith leader Simon Wolf was proud of the Jewish militias that fought bloody wars to return the Blacks to slavery. In his 1895 book, The American Jew as Patriot, Soldier, and Citizen, he wrote of this long suppressed Jewish role. Read more here:

    https://noirg.org/articles/suppression-of-negro-revolts-by-the-jews-of-surinam/

    • Replies: @Corvinus
    , @Joekoool102
  190. anon_382 says:
    @ben sampson

    bahaahaha

    whites came up with the idea of African slavery

    • Replies: @ben sampson
  191. Corvinus says:
    @96.1234

    Do you have any other sources that lend support to the assertion other than the Nation of Islam site? See, I thought that we white people ought not to trust black people, as they have demonstrated repeated to lie, steal, and murder (as a result if their low IQ). So how in the world are we white people able to believe them?

    Furthermore, please offer the appropriate counter evidence to my various points I made on this post.

    It is interesting that you have only 2 posts to your name. Methinks you are a sock puppet. Wally?

  192. Russ says:
    @Rational

    The observations of one Keith Preston, which one reader finds to be wide-ranging and rather thorough:

    http://theagonist.org/essays/2019/12/31/essays-preston.html

    “Zionism and the Power Elite”

    Better to address certain issues on the macroscale.

  193. Daniel.I says:
    @Wizard of Oz

    Disraeli was a Jew, you obfuscating cuck

  194. Cracker. says:
    @ben sampson

    Q: Whats one word you don’t want to say to a black, that starts with an N and ends with an R?

    A: Neighbor!

    I never owned a slave and I’ll never bow before anyone for forgivness of a past I had no control of.

    • Replies: @ben sampson
  195. @anon_382

    you guys missing my point: I am not bothered but however…..

    African slavery as an African factor is relevant to african social life and unique history out of its relatives that served its relatives in regional african life cultural/tradition

    african slavery as a factor of european activity is a european creation period, out of the euro mind and need, and general native social activity which was at base a rapacious and exploitative thing. .African slavery’s place in the conquest of the world and the development of capitalism was of european intiative, purpose and profit

    euro conceived of and created modern enslavement of Africans for proft..whicdh slavery was a multinational euro capitalist effort, global in scope, thoroughly exploitative… and was in no way co-relative to slavery in africa at all. African traditional slavery and Euro enslavement of africans are different things

    european multinational enslavement of Afrcains is 100% european in all aspects of that historical beast, with a legacy to match. it has left the world with a brutal, murderous racist legacy that still engulfs us all..organized racism, aparthied

    • Replies: @anon_382
  196. @Cracker.

    I dont want you to bow for any reason at all. how in the hell does that help me..a bow!? screw that! that is irrelevant in dealing with the truth.

    who the hell cares about your obviously rancid and myopic feelings when it comes so. you are just one person as far as I can see, likely standing 4-square in the path of human progress

    the truth is we have a long history to resolve and move on. bowing does not contribute to resolution of any god dam thing..truth, acknowledgement and compensation do..in well intentioned development of such resolution, informed and driven by democratic social change..which ends exploitation: meaning such resolution would be a finality, and initiatory of a new start, a new phase of human history in which exploitation of humans by humanls ceases to be a factor of social organzation..

    look here! such a stage would be a revolutionary stage, a positive stage and at such a stage and in the process of such positve resolution, I dont see how the parties would be hostile at all but entirely amenable to setting up the new stage, a positive democratic stage for the people by the people… and moving on in democracy

    it seems you have no positive conception of how the world can and must go to end all this nonsense we have to deal with as past legacy..especially of euro behavior in the world. I dont want to have to deal with such as you at all in any routine and normal reality. just look at what you write and say, your attitude..you are a hostile factor in existence, now amenable to anythng positive. what the hell peace and prosperity yoiu can contribute to bringing about in the wrld

    society must bring about a routine reality that cannot possibly produce such like you and so many I see here talking

    • Replies: @Cracker.
  197. Anon[879] • Disclaimer says:

    So White American taxpayers are now supposed to make reparations for what Portuguese and Dutch Jews did centuries ago?

    That 1619 ship that brought the first Africans to the present USA was a Dutch ship Dutch captain. The judge who legalized slavery in Va. in 1654 was appointed by the English government. Slavery was legalized when all the colonies were part of the British Empire ruled by England.

    Soo, how about American blacks sue the present governments of Netherlands and Britain plus the companies descended from The Dutch East India Company, The Virginia Company The British East India Company and any other entity the historians can find involved with the US to Africa slave trade?

    It would really shock those sanctimonious Dutch & Brits constantly sneering at Americans because of slavery and it’s legacy of crime etc.

    • Replies: @ben sampson
  198. Anon[879] • Disclaimer says:
    @steinbergfeldwitzcohen

    The Turks went all the way to Greenland to capture White slaves. West Ireland was a favorite source of beautiful women and skilled craftsmen.

    Captain John Smith of Jamestown Virginia Colony fame was captured and enslaved by Arabs. He managed to escape, returned to England. His next adventure was Jamestown.

  199. anon_382 says:
    @ben sampson

    African slavery as an African factor is relevant to african social life and unique history out of its relatives that served its relatives in regional african life cultural/tradition

    oh, so when africans enslave each other and sell each other its ok?

    european multinational enslavement of Afrcains is 100% european in all aspects of that historical beast, with a legacy to match. it has left the world with a brutal, murderous racist legacy that still engulfs us all..organized racism, aparthied

    now tell us about mooslim enslavement of africans

  200. @Anon

    welllll! aren’t you the empire now? you won and own them all..the multinational arbiter and power.. the world hegemon!

    you are proud of that you americans except when the bills come in. then you cry, whine and bawl like children who have become fat, incompetent slobs on your stolen, murderous largess

    well here is a chance to get fit again..to come out and try to deal with it all in good faith.

    no one sent you in in the first place. your original generations who raped the world did not forsee this day. but there are days like these for all hegemons.

    you will deal with it now or or try postpone for later. but now or later you will have to deal with it regardless

  201. Cracker. says:
    @ben sampson

    “the truth is we have a long history to resolve and move on” how about the bodies that died to free slaves in not just the US civil war but the others?
    You wont move on its not about moving on, its about control and power and thats what you want. Perhaps not you personally but your ideology.

    society must bring about a routine reality that cannot possibly produce such like you and so many I see here talking
    Sounds like control and power, not peace and prosperity. You also seem to lack human understanding, but perhaps if your ideology was presented in a way that didn’t villify and condemn innocents, and you actually had constructive and emperical evidence that was verifiable rather than anticdotal, people like me wouldn’t exist. I wasn’t like this until you could openly say things like remove the white male, whiteness needs eradicated, and meant my skin color(look up whiteness its defined not as some abstraction). Also, blacks never blame themselves, black crime is the whitemans fault, black poverty is the whitemans fault. How about I blame white poverty on blacks, how about we get rid of blackness, end the black male. This is the world you created, I came from what looks now to be an excessivly enclusive and tolerant generation. Now you threaten a new generation, like the bolsheviks did to the bourgouise, the nazi to the jew, and you expect me to be kind, tolerent and listen and compliant and help you heal wounds and scar of your ancestors? All I wanted was to do my thing, raise my children and care for them, you ideology threatents it, threatens my someday grandchildren. I don’t dislike you because your skin color, I dislike your intolerant ideology.

    Also your ideology is nothing but a corporatic tool, brown people displacing whites, why? Your the next tax livestock. This fight between us, is good for your future masters.

    • Agree: Alden
  202. Cracker. says:

    such a stage would be a revolutionary stage, a positive stage and at such a stage and in the process of such positve resolution, I dont see how the parties would be hostile at all but entirely amenable to setting up the new stage, a positive democratic stage for the people by the people… and moving on in democracy.

    What would this look like how would it come about? It sounds great, but I’ve never had anyone tell me anything beyond dreamy platitudes how this would all work. Utopianism is a dream, human nature will not allow it, and no amount of white man bashing will make it work. You want peace and help getting it to happen tell me how, without my white skinned family dead, in your ideology. Which is a jewish ideology btw, all utopianism is, not just the “anti-racist” one by Ignetiev and the Harvard gang that developed it.

    • Replies: @ben sampson
    , @Alden
  203. @BDS Always

    OK, thanks. Here we say ‘whine’. Dogs whine when things upset them, so it’s kind of an insult.

  204. @96.1234

    “HOAX: How does this unlisted “king” of interior Africa write with incisive knowledge of “the nature of whites” and the “nature of blacks,” and with perfect ENGLISH prose?”

    I know it. He didn’t even say “Ungowah” once. Definitely fake.

  205. @Cracker.

    what ideology are you talking about? you dont know what you are talking about! you have a problem reading…you too need a course in comprehension.

    look at the world man..look at all you believe in doctrinally..then compare it to reality..like yourself.. flesh and blood, need to eat, abloute and clean yourself, have protection frmm the natural elements.

    look at the world and how it is..the environment-wind, water, sunlight elements..andall sentient and conscious… all that exists representative of various amd myriad formations of all the elements that exists. look at life, at the world, and see if all the ideologies square with this real, solid, touchable life tha you are… and are a part of, how this life functions?

    none do! reality leaves them all behind and ill-fitting.

    the ideologies, doctrines that facilitates the social control of this or that minority elite here and there do not fit reality..none of them do.

    reality is reality and contains what we must know to live by. all the doctrines we must live by can be directly delineated from nature itself. we do not need anything abstract at all to live by – like gods in heaven somewhere, and this or that ideological compound constructed out of thin air WE MUST BELIEVE INE IN TO LIVE BY. we must belive nothing at all unless as proven true. knowing nature does is not belief and gives us our best chance..and that is to know truth..not to belive in Nancy stories

    but we allowed ourslves to be forced to live according to the doctrines and ill-fitting as they are they have led us all to hell.

    what the doctrines are, are suits that fit this or that dominant minority elitist interest, that facilitates their moinority exploitation of all of us that feeds then as thge parasites they are. we come to believe that which is not in our cordinary individual and collective interest, and we are therefore co-opted to support and fight for another mans interest that is not consistent with our own

    what is in your ordianry individual interest man? go into it and defne it as comprehensively as you can… your own ordinary, individual interest as as a human being who must work for a living… as you have proven to yourself what you are as a human being..and all like you as comprehenively as you can, as wide and as broad as you can..then see how you effect that individual interest of yours, according to your own self-interest?

    what you will discover is that you are one of a group of people..the vast majority of people across the planet… who have the same existential interest of you who must earn a living, and that you cannot achieve that interest, your interest, and general indefinite security unless all of them have can do it to. their secrutiy is just as dependent on you and your achievement of your own, as yours is dependent on them achieving theirs

    you will also disvcover nature and what is possible in nature and what is not. it is not that you cant do anything that nature says your should not do. ynature says nothng of the kind..nature does not speak that way. in nature you can do whatever is possible if you like. but that is only a point in time when you act, decide and move, every act you make. and when you act, movement, you affect the life around you, other things, the air, water, the universe actually, and there is an equal and opposite reaction..endlesly. so if you do something that contains disastrous potential there you go..penalty is coming your way n some way shape or form

    so that no one knows where anything startedm starts or ended… starts and ends. tricky eh! but you can do what you want: it he resultss of what you do, the potential and its nature contained in your action that is the question.

    because of equal and opposite reaction over time then you have to be careful of what you do.

    the quality of behavior disciplines life into the possibilties contained there-in. and we never know the extent of such potential when we live… and living is doing. if you do evil you will produce evil and that will come back you..and others too. you have to try to disciple the future positvely by what positives you do now, yesterday and tomorrow. we all do that..we all know what setting the stage is. we all know that the totality of the potential of constant uniersal movement is vast, beyond our comprehension and with potential that can sweep us all away. we just dont know.

    to save ourselves we must come to know and to act in concert with what we call the positive to discipline the futue and so give ourslves our best chance in existeice.. to go on in it indefinitely..to create forms of living that has the best potential to make for us scurity in life every day we are still in existence.

    we do not do it out of the good of our hearts as such but out of pratical self interest, as practical activity with our own ordinary individual security in mind. and individual security is the same as collective secutiry for no one individual or group is going to do it alone or can do it alone. neaqr or far humanity has no chance in nature save moving forad as vast, diverse, physically/biologically fit, intellectually fit collectively we can muster at all times. we have no chance other wise.

    perhaps that is what you do not realize as yet in all the talk…if you increase your knowldege enough honestly enough you will come to that point where you can see life as it is, who we are what we are, to the extent we have proven those issues, and what we can and must do in order to survive indefinitely..and if we do anythng other that what we must do to produce ongoing positive reaction and existential potential will soon enough kill us all off.

    and look..its happening right in front your face as we speak..the sucide of the human species right in frotn your face if you have eyes to see, right now this minite..we are all on the point of existential elimination from the universe by ur own hand

    that is what I am talking about man..the general realization of reality and the truth coming we know we must bring to underpin our bahavior and therefore acting in individual self interest properly defined by expeience and knowledge, we come to see is the same as acting in the interest of everyone elss..acting in the interest of fthe. we cannot survive alone as individual..our species must survive in toto to guarantee the survivla of the individual.

    that is also the crystalization that is produced in the collective mind in social crisis like what we face now and developing continually.

    right now you can see, prove all I have said and more. that is the crystallization that comes to play at the stage I am talking about..when we come to act collectively with such knowledge as the popular base of such movement..knowledge that comes out of our experience of life.

    that is why I argue that only in the popular interest lies the possibility of democray…democracy does not lie in the minority interest. why because the people do all the work, create all the wealth and it is taken away from the people by those minorities systematically..by the sociall formations under which we live created by minority elites they tax it all away. they do no work as such..doing anythng productive of wealth. they are thieves and parasites

    only the people do the work, produce all the wealth… but the people do not run society. the formations by which we the people live we did not create, and they were not created by the minority who did the cereating to reflect our ordinary popular interest.

    the social systems by which we live fucntion according to the interest of the controlling parastic minorities. for the social systematic formations to function according to the peopless interest it follows simply that the people must take over society and create formations that reflect the peoples need and collective interest. society cant work in the interest of the people otherwise, and the elites wll not create anything in the peoples interest. society can work one way at a time..either in the interest of the elites… or in the interst of the people. there is no middle ground.

    and because the peole are the vast majority, if the people move, dominate sociey and make the systems by which society functions, then making social formations by the people will also be for the people..which is equal to real to DEMOCRACY. by social interest and need, by suivival need.. the people canot help but create democracy in running society..popular democracy.

    that is why the people must move without being led by any minority interest at all, by no political party at all..or any minority party or interest at the head of the popular movement.

    these minority eltist interests will always betray popular democractic principles, and once again impose minority elitist society on the people. eilites are parastic! they do not work but occupy all the power and the people pay for all of it… again.

    that will not do anymore. it is too late to repeat that now. society is too advanced to permit elitist social control any longer, becuse this time it will lead to permanent control of the people by scientific and technoloical means..forms of social control we will not be able to free ourselves from, and to reverse

    so at that future stage I am talking about, at which proper social decisions are taken, the people would have come to clarity on the situation and organized to correct it all by direct popular democracy..the people actually running society..as an urgent and practical and species-saving response to our current total global social crisis… the very crisis we have created for ourslves by allowing in the first place, minority social control from to start, that has grown to its current dominance

    it is not about race..it is about money and social control…elitism. there must be social control, in control of society, managing society etc., but in whose hands? in the hands of minority elites we are all enslaved. if the people rise and establihs popular power the species is saved.

    that is what I am talking about

    • Replies: @Cracker.
  206. mario964 says:
    @96.1234

    I have spent many years in black Africa and I know very well what I’m talking about.
    The mindset is still very well alive today.

    From “Buried Beneath the Baobab Tree” – September 4, 2018. By Adaobi Tricia Nwaubani. She is a bright Nigerian young writer.

    My great-grandfather….Nwaubani Ogogo. In the late nineteenth century, he carried a slave-trading license from the Royal Niger Company, an English corporation that ruled southern Nigeria. His agents captured slaves across the region and passed them to middlemen, who brought them to the ports of Bonny and Calabar and sold them to white merchants. Slavery had already been abolished in the United States and the United Kingdom, but his slaves were legally shipped to Cuba and Brazil…. Nwaubani Ogogo was so esteemed that, when he died, a leopard was killed, and six slaves were buried alive with him.. my father sat in his favorite armchair, among a group of his grandchildren, and told stories about Nwaubani Ogogo. “Are you not ashamed of what he did?” I asked. “I can never be ashamed of him,” he said, irritated. “Why should I be? His business was legitimate at the time. He was respected by everyone around.” My father is a lawyer and a human-rights activist who has spent much of his life challenging government abuses in southeast Nigeria.https://www.newyorker.com/culture/personal-history/my-great-grandfather-the-nigerian-slave-trader

    Moreover witchcraft (ju-ju) is ubiquitous, while human sacrifices belong to African culture that is still deeply rooted.
    In Nigeria head-hunters are paid to provide heads to be buried with dead “big men”. I was living in the Niger river delta in the summer of 1978 when the King of Benin died. I remember that deep fear was widespread among the natives, all of them, men and women, shaved their heads in remembrance and submission to the ancient creed that “My head belongs to the King“, the rumors were that almost 400 heads had been collected to provide a proper bed for the King’s corpse to be laid upon. The body of a headless pregnant woman was reportedly found in Benin city, her belly ripped open and her fetus decapitated.
    See: “My head belong to the King”
    https://www.jstor.org/stable/182916?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

    The argument about the perfect English prose of king Adahoonzou is quite old and debunked. It’s obvious that the prose comes from Dalzel’s translation. Dalzel has spent many years in Dahomey and spoke the local language.

    How would you like to have a stroll alone by night in a southern Nigerian town where a “big man” is dead but not yet buried and nobody is allowed to speak about his death till after the burial?

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
  207. Cracker. says:
    @ben sampson

    The ideology I was talking about is often under the name, “Anti-Racism”. I assumed based on your agruments that was where you were coming from, perhaps I am wrong. I cannot tell where you are in the world, and what ideologies have taken root. The ideology of anti-racism is a convient name to a lie, it is actually a pro-racist ideology that attempts to subjugate whites. Now based on your prior statements, they aligned with the anti-racist ones of villifying whites and creating a victimization culture amongst blacks and other minorities in the US, Europe, and Australia, and some parts of SA (I think). Yes I can comprehend I am a Ph.d, though your written English is a little confusing, I hope I am clear to you. While I generally agree with the idea of self govern society, as such you describe and I clearly see the world in going to hell, the problem is that the elites are doing everything they can to divide us and control us. The anti-racism ideology is one means because of subtle subterfuge, it claims to work for equality, equity, for all the races of the world and make amends for all the ills, while whites are the reason for this all of these ills and should be terminally regretfull and shamed, and allow minorities to “control” the world, in a odd form of racism ala the noble savage. The same ideology while pushing for tolerance and inclusion uses race as a weapon where anyone can say “whites are evil”,”go extinct”etc.. It also blames whites for the ills of blacks, even if they are not connected. The high rates of violent crime commited by US blacks for instance is blamed on whites because racism exists and not because in the black community violence is seen as a badge of manhood which is the truth. Much of black american plight is a result of the last 60 years of equality laws, where blacks have created a culture that functions an a purposeful anti-thesis to white culture. There in the black community is an abhorrence to education, responsibility, family, community etc.. because they are considered white things.

    While I commend your ideals in your reply about a sovereign humanity on a global level. The issue remains of local division and strife, and the forced multicultural push the global elites have pushed on the West help fracture and divide humanity more. Its not an issue of tolerance because tolerance is not allowing “minorities” to walk all over you just because of past greviences. In England there has been large amount of child rape, the police cannot call out or deal with because of the fear of being labeled racist, and calling it out puts the noble savage narrative at risk. The elites are pitting humanity together to create such chaos that we give in to their corportrate globalism. They focus on villifying whites because due to past circumstance, or as Heidegger calls it our throwness, in this case our collective throwness, he have control of much of the world. On an individual level this is an illusion, we control nothing, the elites do, and they are crushing us so that they can lower the standard of living in the west, and send it to levels of just barely tolerable for the sole reason of power and wealth. Sadly the world cannot be a collective community at this time, there is just too much to deal with between us on a national level.

    • Replies: @ben sampson
  208. @ben sampson

    WHATEVER the differences between white and African slavery, Africans sold blacks into an American slavery controlled by whites.

    But who are the “Whites” anyway? That is a complicated question.

    European and American Jews are of course white but only in a superficial sense. I think of Jews as non aryan or non european whites. Jews are much more likely to be similar to each other genetically than are Aryans Moreover, Jews are ethnocentric and internationalist as opposed to Aryans who are individualist and nationalistic. Jews primarily identify as Jews. Aryan whites primarily identify as Swedish or Americans etc Hence there is a Jewish Power but no White Power- only American power or Swedish power that happens to be white.

    AS to Jews, whites and capitalism, obviously plenty of capitalists are white aryans but Jews have a special relationship to Capitalism. Capitalism is a euphemism for what was once called Usury – the making of money independently of productivity, employment, and social cohesiveness. In other words Usury is the making of money to make money rather than the making of money thru the making of material products by employing people at a living wage Usury was regarded as a sin in the Catholic middle ages. Jews- perhaps because they were considered by christians to be outside of salvation or perhaps because they have a culture cum genetic disposition against old fashion productivity and labor – became the primary userers; they lent money to peasants at high and compounding interest rates, and tax farmed for the kIng Then Protestantism sanctified usury with the Protestant ethic – wealth as a sign of salvation. Finally economists gave usury a new title – “Capitalism”. Speculation, compounding interest, and financializing deindustrialization – all once USURIOUS practices – now became “capitalism”. All these practices value making money over productive labor and making things . Meanwhile the Jews who had traditionally been userers not surprisingly became the virtuoso practitioners of the rapidly growing usurious or capitalistic western economics They also joined the economics profession in large numbers and the scientization of capitalism or usury continued apace. Today Ph’d ‘s in economics may not know what usury is but they are busy cranking out numbers to rationalize its practice which they call capitalism.

    Is this capitalism White? Certainly whites practice it but if I were to give it an ethnicity, I would call it Jewish. I would also go back to calling it Usury. Naturally the Jews wouldn’t like that.

  209. @Cracker.

    I am sorry about that piece and its typos. it is awful! I am impressed that you guys battled with it at all. that establishes your sincerity.

    good show! thanks for taking the time

    I have a condition I must monitor or I will lose cohesion..it is unawares, sneaks up and does its rendering.
    sorry

  210. @Sick of Orcs

    Subtract welfare and prison costs and reparations for blacks ends up a bill, not a payout.

    That’s the just subtotal.

    Now subtract the health, financial, ecological, & psychological costs of Black crime & Black (((media))) worship.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  211. Corvinus says:
    @Pat Kittle

    “Subtract welfare and prison costs and reparations for blacks ends up a bill, not a payout. That’s the just subtotal.”

    Not so fast. From 1850 to 1940, racial and ethnic minorities—including foreign-born and non-English speaking European immigrants— made up 40 to 50 percent of the prison population. Furthermore, you have to consider how Jim Crow laws in the American South during that time frame aggressively enforced those statutes and funneled greater numbers of them into the state punishment systems. State penal authorities deployed these imprisoned people to help rebuild the South—they rented out convicted people to private companies through a system of convict leasing and put incarcerated individuals to work on, for example, prison farms to produce agricultural products.

    “Now subtract the health, financial, ecological, & psychological costs of Black crime & Black (((media))) worship.”

    While doubling the health, financial, ecological, & psychological costs of white colonization and imperialism for nearly 400 years.

    • Replies: @Pat Kittle
    , @96.1234
  212. @Corvinus

    Thanks to SJW’s like you, Black criminality is increasingly hard to monitor.

    Those who do get deplatformed, slandered, censored, banned, fired, & physically attacked.

    You wanna play dumb? You don’t know what I mean?

    Here’s a sampling, and story of which would be plastered all over the (((mainstream media))) if the perps were White & the victims Black:

    — ( https://www.unz.com/author/paul-kersey/ )

    You of course already know this, and are amused by it.

    BTW, every immigrant who comes here from overseas is just as guilty as the Whites who previously massacred the Native Americans. Today’s immigrants merely waited for those Whites to do their dirty work for them, before they too took over Native American lands.

    Yeah, that’s right.

    Why don’t you confront the Terrorist Theocracy of Israel. If you really give a crap about justice, that is where you are truly needed.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  213. Corvinus says:
    @geokat62

    “LOL! There you go, again… “according to Martin.””

    Indeed, according to Martin, who dubiously misrepresented several experts, as I noted earlier.

    Again, I was told that Jews and blacks were not to be trusted. Yet, you apparently are a slave to their every word. Why?

    In 1820, over 75 percent of all Jewish families in Charleston, Richmond, and Savannah owned slaves, employed as domestic servants; almost 40 percent of all Jewish householders in the United States owned one slave or more. Is it because of their ethnicity, wealth, or both?

    In 1830, there were only 120 Jews among the 45,000 slaveholders owning twenty or more slaves and only twenty Jews among the 12,000 slaveholders owning fifty or more slaves. Is it because of their ethnicity, wealth, or both?

    In 1830, it was estimated there were 4000 Jews in the United States, mostly concentrated in urban areas. Thirty-six percent of the estimated 625,000 families in the South owned slaves in the 1830’s. Thirty-six percent is about 225,000 families. Out of that number (225,000), 322 were determined to be Jewish households. Out of the 332 Jewish households in the South, it is estimated 75% owned slaves. The remaining households (224,768) were non-Jewish…and owned slaves. So 99.89% of non-Jewish families (out of 225,000) held blacks in perpetual bondage.

    That is the proper context that Martin patently neglected to provide and that the historians I cited take him to task on his shoddy work.

    Remember, it was YOU who had stated that it is “relatively trivial thing to challenge a particular statistic ( i.e., 70%), as there are a number of assumptions upon which this statistic is based that are easily assailable”.

    • Replies: @geokat62
  214. Corvinus says:
    @Pat Kittle

    “Thanks to SJW’s like you, Black criminality is increasingly hard to monitor.”

    Except I’m not an SJW.

    “Those who do get deplatformed, slandered, censored, banned, fired, & physically attacked.”

    Terrible, indeed.

    “Here’s a sampling…”

    Thanks for the memories.

    “BTW, every immigrant who comes here from overseas is just as guilty as the Whites who previously massacred the Native Americans.”

    How so? Please explain.

    “Today’s immigrants merely waited for those Whites to do their dirty work for them, before they too took over Native American lands.”

    So tit for tat?

    “Why don’t you confront the Terrorist Theocracy of Israel.”

    Because that place doesn’t exist. Is that your Jewish Wakanda?

    • Replies: @Pat Kittle
  215. @ben sampson

    dont let the Ben Sampson fool you..I am not Jewish.

    i’m not a jew either

  216. JamesinNM says:

    Thankfully, no evil will escape God’s righteous judgement.

  217. geokat62 says:
    @Corvinus

    So 99.89% of non-Jewish families (out of 225,000) held blacks in perpetual bondage.

    LOL. Keep trying to make that silk purse out of a sow’s ear, Corvy!

    Bottom Line: Twice as many (75%) Jewish households owned slaves compared to white households (36%) in the 1830s.

    Oink, oink!

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  218. @Corvinus

    (((You))) obviously take pleasure in stirring up chaos for the goyim.

    BTW, “Wakanda” is indeed Jewish — it was created by two anti-White Jews, for the purpose of making Blacks think Whites prevent them from having an advanced civilization.

    When in reality Jews rans the slave trade, as this article documents.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  219. Corvinus says:
    @geokat62

    Bottom line: I cited numbers and statistics directly from Rosenwaike. Take it up with him.

  220. Corvinus says:
    @Pat Kittle

    “(((You))) obviously take pleasure in stirring up chaos for the goyim.”

    You have a wild imagination. Pray tell, why are you obsessed with Jews?

    “When in reality Jews rans the slave trade, as this article documents.”

    You mean Jews and non-Jews ran the slave trade. Now, are you even able to muster up a cogent rebuttal to the posts I made on this topic?

  221. 96.1234 says:
    @Corvinus

    In 1905, Atlanta police arrested roughly 10,000 Black men—an astounding twenty percent of the Black male population—but not for any actual crimes. Through the generalized charge of “vagrancy,” Black “criminals” underwent “corrections” through the “therapy” of forced labor. Black men were leased to planters in times of harvest and to construction firms to build the state’s roads and bridges. Nine out of ten people arrested in Georgia for these invented offenses were Black, branding much of the male population as “criminal.” Of course, the lazy and unproductive white pre-Nazi American men were the actual criminals.

    Douglas Blackmon, author of Slavery By Another Name, is very clear on that point:

    “And the truth was that in most places in the South, there was almost no criminal activity, almost no arrests, except at a time when one of these large industrial interests or commercial interests needed labor. And when that was the case, local sheriffs would begin these aggressive roundups…”

  222. You mean Jews and non-Jews ran the slave trade.

    Like Jews and non-Jews run Hollywood:
    ============================

    Who runs Hollywood? C’mon

    By JOEL STEIN
    — ( https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2008-dec-19-oe-stein19-story.html )

    [MORE]

    I have never been so upset by a poll in my life. Only 22% of Americans now believe “the movie and television industries are pretty much run by Jews,” down from nearly 50% in 1964. The Anti-Defamation League, which released the poll results last month, sees in these numbers a victory against stereotyping. Actually, it just shows how dumb America has gotten. Jews totally run Hollywood.

    How deeply Jewish is Hollywood? When the studio chiefs took out a full-page ad in the Los Angeles Times a few weeks ago to demand that the Screen Actors Guild settle its contract, the open letter was signed by: News Corp. President Peter Chernin (Jewish), Paramount Pictures Chairman Brad Grey (Jewish), Walt Disney Co. Chief Executive Robert Iger (Jewish), Sony Pictures Chairman Michael Lynton (surprise, Dutch Jew), Warner Bros. Chairman Barry Meyer (Jewish), CBS Corp. Chief Executive Leslie Moonves (so Jewish his great uncle was the first prime minister of Israel), MGM Chairman Harry Sloan (Jewish) and NBC Universal Chief Executive Jeff Zucker (mega-Jewish). If either of the Weinstein brothers had signed, this group would have not only the power to shut down all film production but to form a minyan with enough Fiji water on hand to fill a mikvah.

    The person they were yelling at in that ad was SAG President Alan Rosenberg (take a guess). The scathing rebuttal to the ad was written by entertainment super-agent Ari Emanuel (Jew with Israeli parents) on the Huffington Post, which is owned by Arianna Huffington (not Jewish and has never worked in Hollywood.)

    The Jews are so dominant, I had to scour the trades to come up with six Gentiles in high positions at entertainment companies. When I called them to talk about their incredible advancement, five of them refused to talk to me, apparently out of fear of insulting Jews. The sixth, AMC President Charlie Collier, turned out to be Jewish.

    As a proud Jew, I want America to know about our accomplishment. Yes, we control Hollywood. Without us, you’d be flipping between “The 700 Club” and “Davey and Goliath” on TV all day.

    So I’ve taken it upon myself to re-convince America that Jews run Hollywood by launching a public relations campaign, because that’s what we do best. I’m weighing several slogans, including: “Hollywood: More Jewish than ever!”; “Hollywood: From the people who brought you the Bible”; and “Hollywood: If you enjoy TV and movies, then you probably like Jews after all.”

    I called ADL Chairman Abe Foxman, who was in Santiago, Chile, where, he told me to my dismay, he was not hunting Nazis. He dismissed my whole proposition, saying that the number of people who think Jews run Hollywood is still too high. The ADL poll, he pointed out, showed that 59% of Americans think Hollywood execs “do not share the religious and moral values of most Americans,” and 43% think the entertainment industry is waging an organized campaign to “weaken the influence of religious values in this country.”

    That’s a sinister canard, Foxman said. “It means they think Jews meet at Canter’s Deli on Friday mornings to decide what’s best for the Jews.” Foxman’s argument made me rethink: I have to eat at Canter’s more often.

    “That’s a very dangerous phrase, ‘Jews control Hollywood.’ What is true is that there are a lot of Jews in Hollywood,” he said. Instead of “control,” Foxman would prefer people say that many executives in the industry “happen to be Jewish,” as in “all eight major film studios are run by men who happen to be Jewish.”

    But Foxman said he is proud of the accomplishments of American Jews. “I think Jews are disproportionately represented in the creative industry. They’re disproportionate as lawyers and probably medicine here as well,” he said. He argues that this does not mean that Jews make pro-Jewish movies any more than they do pro-Jewish surgery. Though other countries, I’ve noticed, aren’t so big on circumcision.

    I appreciate Foxman’s concerns. And maybe my life spent in a New Jersey-New York/Bay Area-L.A. pro-Semitic cocoon has left me naive. But I don’t care if Americans think we’re running the news media, Hollywood, Wall Street or the government. I just care that we get to keep running them.

    By JOEL STEIN
    — ( https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2008-dec-19-oe-stein19-story.html )

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  223. Anon[186] • Disclaimer says:
    @geokat62

    Jews have managed to shift the guilt of Black Slavery in America onto the white people. Thus American Black young school children are brought up to hate the Whites because of the supposed white guilt for Black Slavery.
    Black American youth are taught to hate all Whites for all their short comings in society. Blacks believe that the Whites are keeping them down because of the color of their skin. Fact of the matter is that whites played a very minor role in the slave trade or for that actually owned Black slaves. The whites to this day are smeared and burdened with the guilt of the past crimes perpetrated against African Blacks. Blacks are ignorant of the fact that Jews ran and profited from the African slave trade for over 300 years. England took it upon themselves to end the slave trade. American whites fought for the ending of slavery in the USA where over 500,000 gave their lives to end slavery in America.








    https://www.bitchute.com/video/PINi6IYT7faD/

    • Replies: @Pat Kittle
    , @Corvinus
  224. Corvinus says:
    @Pat Kittle

    Thanks for the red herring. Focus! Are you even able to muster up a cogent rebuttal to the posts I made on this topic?

  225. @Anon

    (((Hollywood))) keeps cranking out (((absurdly anti-White slavery agitprop))), knowing fully well what the real-world results will be.

    Yet (((Hollywood))) has NEVER made even ONE movie about the (((massive Jewish role in slavery))).

    Perhaps our (((hasbara trolls))) can explain that for us.

  226. https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2019/04/29/many-across-the-globe-are-dissatisfied-with-how-democracy-is-working/

    as the crisis develops the truth can crystalize in the popular mind directly from social experience, becoming a basis for spontaneous progressive collective popular social action that requires no miority leadership of any sort..not from politicfal parties social groups intellectuals etc..none!

    simmply the people suffering, exploited, poorly paid fr long hard work, cant make ends meet in a realty in whihc they clealry can do better but for the economic strangulation by the capitalists..by their governments and systems of taxation and regulation that set up the financial institutions to rip off society, banks, corporations, media that lies, education that sucks, health system that does not cure while their polution makes the people sick..corporations that shut down competion, monopolize all cmmercial and financial activity while hypocritically celebrating competiton everytime they open their mouths

    it can become clear to the people all that is going on and that there is only one way to resolve it in their collectgive vfavor..kill minority owned social monopoly and create a system of social organzation that works to ensure that they can feed themselves, develop life in the popular general interest and so save humnaity period

    the people are not stupid as we are always given the credit for being! ‘Every Cook Can Govern!’

  227. Corvinus says:
    @Anon

    “Fact of the matter is that whites played a very minor role in the slave trade or for that actually owned Black slaves.”

    followed by…

    “American whites fought for the ending of slavery in the USA where over 500,000 gave their lives to end slavery in America.”

    Are you able to comprehend the irony and hypocrisy here? Are you also able to muster up the requisite source material to refute my statements in my previous posts on the topic of white-Jew involvement in slavery? Or are you (literally) a slave to your own confirmation bias?

    • Replies: @Pat Kittle
  228. Alfred says:
    @Wizard of Oz

    Disraeli (an Anglican btw, not Jewish by religion) died in 1881 a year before Britain took control of Egypt

    Disraeli bought over 40% of the shares of the Suez Canal from the profligate and indebted Turkish ruler of Egypt Khedive Ismail. The French also bought shares. Rothschilds were the financiers.

    Disraeli’s speech on the acquisition of the Suez Canal Shares: 21 February 1876

    By gaining control of the Suez Canal for 99 years, the British essentially controlled Egypt. France was “given” the Levant. When president Nasser nationalized the Suez Canal in 1956, the British, French and Israelis used these shares as a pretext to invade Egypt. They only got out when Eisenhower threatened them.

    If Disraeli is not Jewish then Soros is also not Jewish. The Jewpedia describes him as often critcised for being antisemitic. Total hypocrites and liars both of them.

  229. @Corvinus

    Whether you like it or not, we’ll determine your credibility by your response to this question:

    Do you believe the official version of the so-called “Holocaust,” as dictated by the ADL & an ever-growing number of “Holocaust museums”?

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  230. Corvinus says:
    @Pat Kittle

    “Whether you like it or not, we’ll determine your credibility by your response to this question: Do you believe the official version of the so-called “Holocaust,” as dictated by the ADL & an ever-growing number of “Holocaust museums”?”

    LOL, so you’re begging the question AND are a slave to confirmation bias. There was a Holocaust, as defined by those who experienced it–Jew and non-Jew. We can quibble over certain details, but the fact of the matter that there was a systematic effort to eradicate Jews and other groups deemed “expendable” by the Nazi.

    Now, let’s focus here. Are you also able to muster up the requisite source material to refute my statements in my previous posts on the topic of white-Jew involvement in slavery?

    • Replies: @Pat Kittle
  231. @Corvinus

    (((Corvinus the hasbara troll))):

    Your “Holocaust” has been thoroughly debunked, which is why (((you people))) are so determined to prevent anyone from seeing the evidence.

    Same thing here — (((you people))) do (((your damnedest))) to prevent the world from seeing anything that contradicts (((your version))) of historical events.

    ========================================
    Books Banned by Amazon Available for Purchase

    “Jews Selling Blacks
    Slave-Sale Advertising by American Jews”

    NOI Research Group • 2010 • $10.00
    — ( https://www.unz.com/bookstore/noi_research_group__jews-selling-blacks/ )
    =========================================

    Why are (((you people))) so terrified of freedom of speech?

    The answer is obvious.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
    , @Joekoool102
  232. Corvinus says:
    @Pat Kittle

    “(((Corvinus the hasbara troll)))”

    LOL. Why are you so obsessed with Jews?

    “Your “Holocaust” has been thoroughly debunked, which is why (((you people))) are so determined to prevent anyone from seeing the evidence.”

    Actually, the Holocaust occurred, which is why you are so hell-bent on ignoring the historical evidence that has been accumulated.

    “Same thing here — (((you people))) do (((your damnedest))) to prevent the world from seeing anything that contradicts (((your version))) of historical events.”

    Do you even comprehend the irony here? Now, were Jews involved in the slave trade? Absolutely. Now that we got that out of the way, why are you running away from addressing the points I made on this thread about the extent of their involvement? What are you so afraid of?

    “Why are (((you people))) so terrified of freedom of speech? The answer is obvious.”

    You mean Amazon, a private company, made a business decision. I personally have no issues with having the book be made available for purchase and for reading. Do try harder next time.

    • Replies: @Pat Kittle
    , @Pat Kittle
  233. @Corvinus

    (((Corvinus the hasbara troll))):

    Jeff Bezos of Amazon in 1998 resisted Jew pressure (ADL, etc.) to ban books. Eventually he caved in. It was (((your people))) & NO ONE ELSE who got him to ban books Jews don’t like. You know that, and you’re obviously OK with it.

    You allege your cash-cow “Holocaust” happened as dictated by Jews. Do you object to throwing people in prison for questioning it? You know that’s happening. Have you EVER publicly objected to it?

    Before we spend any more time with you, we first want to see if you’re a sleazy cowardly hypocrite.

    Or not.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  234. @96.1234

    The Jews brought slavery to the new world in the 1500s.

  235. @Corvinus

    Also let’s not forget, it was the Jews, who introduced slavery in the new world in the 1500s.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  236. @Corvinus

    …Amazon, a private company, made a business decision…

    As I previously mentioned, Jeff Bezos of Amazon did indeed cave in to anti-White Jews of the ADL.

    Fortunately Jews of character don’t cave in — such as Ron Unz:

    “Books Banned by Amazon Available for Purchase”:

    — ( https://www.unz.com/bookstore/ )

    Notice that virtually all those banned books expose Jewish treachery. Quite the cohencidence, isn’t it.

  237. Corvinus says:
    @Pat Kittle

    “It was (((your people))) & NO ONE ELSE who got him to ban books Jews don’t like. You know that, and you’re obviously OK with it”

    Actually, I’m not OK with it. And, no, I’m not Jewish, or a Hasbara troll. That is simply your default button. Anyone who disagrees with you, you press it. In that way, you don’t have to think very hard.

    “Do you object to throwing people in prison for questioning it? You know that’s happening.”

    Sources?

    “Have you EVER publicly objected to it?”

    If people want to publicly deny that the Holocaust occurred, which of course did occur, then they can knock themselves out.

    • Replies: @Pat Kittle
  238. Corvinus says:
    @Joekoool102

    “Also let’s not forget, it was the Jews, who introduced slavery in the new world in the 1500s.”

    Sources to back up your claim?

    • Replies: @Joekoool102
  239. @Corvinus

    (((Corvinus the hasbara troll))):

    Collect (((your hasbara shekels))), courtesy of the American goyim.

    Get lost, (((parasite))) — we’re not wasting more time on (((you))).

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  240. @mario964

    The fact that “a bright young Nigerian writer” writes something printed in the New Yorker doesn’t make it true (I have in mind a scandal involving a Jordanian female writer/pretender). Have you other sources for her story?

    • Replies: @Flubber
    , @mario964
  241. Flubber says:
    @Achilles Wannabe

    I dont think you need to wonder; all the Dem candidates support reparations, even the supposedly sane Tulsi Gabbard.

    They’ll just fight like demons to propagandise blacks into seeing it as something white people owe them.

  242. Flubber says:
    @Wizard of Oz

    How about the collected academic works of Dr Tony Martin?

  243. @Pat Kittle

    There is evidence of white slaves sold from Iberian peninsula to the Moors of north Africa and white slaves sold from the lands of Russia and eastern Europe to the Arabs. This happened from the 8th to 11th century.
    Of course the Jews dominated the slave trade market.

  244. @Corvinus

    There is much written who is responsible for slave trade to south America. There’s Dr Tony Martin
    There is much information here and elsewhere if you care to research.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  245. There is much written who is responsible for slave trade to south America. There’s Dr Tony Martin.
    There is much information here and elsewhere if you care to research.

  246. mario964 says:
    @Wizard of Oz

    From Face2face Africa, a premier pan-African digital media and events company based in New York City. Our mission is to reshape the pan-African narrative and amplify the voice of black people around the globe.

    “A look at Dahomey’s gory history of human sacrifices on a large scale”

    ….The death of a royal was an excuse to kill more humans as part of their customs. It is reported that the “funeral ceremonies for King Kpengla, who died in 1789, involved, over a period of two years, the killing of some 1,500 persons, many of them war captives.”
    A temple in Abomey has a tomb where a king was buried with his wives. The king was known to have about 200 wives and custom demands the king to be buried with his wives. When he died 41 women were killed to join him in the afterlife – a practice they believed in…

    https://face2faceafrica.com/article/a-look-at-dahomeys-gory-history-of-human-sacrifices-on-a-large-scale

    • Replies: @Anon
    , @Wizard of Oz
  247. Corvinus says:
    @Joekoool102

    “There is much written who is responsible for slave trade to south America. There’s Dr Tony Martin…”

    I have addressed his work on this thread. Please offer your commentary, as well as a source for your claim ““Also let’s not forget, it was the Jews, who introduced slavery in the new world in the 1500s.”

  248. Corvinus says:
    @Pat Kittle

    You’re not even making any sense.

    • Replies: @Pat Kittle
  249. Anon[336] • Disclaimer says:
    @mario964

    What has that got to do with the writings of “a bright young Nigerian writer” or, specifically, whether it is fact or fiction? Did you read the question?

    • Replies: @mario964
  250. @mario964

    I looked at the link but find it a little strange that no archaeological evidence was cited for events that must have produced a lot.

    • Replies: @mario964
  251. @Corvinus

    You’re not even making any sense.

    (((Corvinus the hasbara troll))):

    It’s always amusing to watch a (((hasbara troll))) pretending not to know what a (((hasbara troll))) is.
    🙂
    (((You)))’ve posted over 10,000 comments here at the Unz Report. (((You))) are always quick to deny, divert, or trivialize any criticism of Jews/Israel/Zionism.

    But (((you))) don’t know what a (((hasbara troll))) is?!
    🙂

    BTW, here’s a funny story about one of your fellow (((trolls))):

    “Common Dreams’ website traps Hasbara troll spewing anti-Semitism”:
    — ( https://mondoweiss.net/2014/08/hasbara-spewing-semitism/ )
    🙂

    • Agree: Joekoool102
  252. mario964 says:
    @Anon

    She’s talking about her family. How can it be fiction? Does anybody smears her/his own family? Can’t you read that she carries the name Nwaubani like her great-grandfather?
    Can’t you understand that she’s talking about a deeply entrenched tradition of human sacrifices she’s deeply ashamed of?

    No kind of gimmickry can hide anymore the fact that human sacrifices are a distinctive feature of so-called African “culture”.
    Have a look at widespread ritual child sacrifice in Uganda and all over Aftica:

    Wikipedia: Child sacrifice in Uganda
    In Sub-Saharan Africa, “the practice of ritual killing and human sacrifice continues to take place in contravention of the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights and other human rights instruments.” In the 21st century, such practices have been reported in Nigeria, Uganda, Swaziland, Liberia, Tanzania, Namibia, and Zimbabwe, as well as Mozambique, and Mali.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Child_sacrifice_in_Uganda

  253. mario964 says:
    @Wizard of Oz

    Archaeological evidence aplenty.

    From:
    BLOOD, DECAPITATION, HUMAN SACRIFICE AND THE DAHOMEY KINGDOM

    I’m guided into the grounds of the palace, a UNESCO site which covers over 4 square kilometers and encompasses more than a dozen palaces and temples. The first palace I see has painted stone carvings engraved into the wall. The first depicts a man beating the other with a dismembered leg, the second a horse wearing a decapitated head as pendant, and the third of a man with a gun pointed into the mouth of a chained enemy.
    The guide, who carries a bit of a cold attitude, points to a round temple now covered by a tin roof.
    “This temple is made from the blood of the enemies of the former king,” she points out as if coagulated blood is a normal form of cement. “The blood is also mixed with some holy water from a spiritual river and some animals which have been sacrificed.”
    She points to the side of the temple where the now dried out corpses of other animals and their skeletons lay alongside the building. The guide continues in saying that when the king dies his wives are meant to die with him. The temple, in which I’m allowed walk around, is the tomb of the former king’s wives. While he is said to have had as many as 200 wives, when he died they decided to sacrifice 41 of them to the afterlife. They were lowered into the basin of the temple, drank a glass of poison and died there below where my feet now stand.

    https://www.brendansadventures.com/abomey-dahomey-kingdom/

    BTW if you go to Benin City and ask the locals about the huge wall surrounding the sprawling king’s palace, they’ll tell you that it’s made of mud mixed with human blood.
    Very nice “culture”. Quite worth defending.

    • Thanks: Wizard of Oz
  254. Dani says:
    @Priss Factor

    I don’t disagree with this – I imagine quite a few others don’t, either. However, why then is it only whites who are being demonized for this, when whites, in fact, were among the lowest numbers of actually possessing/buying/selling slaves of any kind?

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All NOI Research Group Comments via RSS