The Unz Review: An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 Marcus Alethia Archive
Jews and Immigration: Time for Change
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>
Hester Street Market, New York City's Lower East Side in 1884.

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

Our country and its Jewish intelligentsia are currently torn by a debate about immigration. On one side the Trump administration is trying to pass executive orders limiting immigration from particular, though certainly not all, Muslim-majority countries while also deporting people — largely from Mexico or Central America — who are in the US illegally.

On the other side are activist judges shutting down these executive orders and what seems like the entire constellation of journalists, pundits and activists in the country decrying these moves. From looking at the writers of many op-ed pieces or from looking through Jewish publications such as Forward, it is clear that Jews are disproportionately lobbying in favor of immigration and against deportation or immigration restrictions. Jewish organizations ostensibly formed to lobby for Jewish interests are on the side of resettling more Muslim refugees. Some voices on this side go so far as to call for “open borders” as in a recent piece in Salon. Most of the left has long decried the idea of White interests or White rights as being inherently racist in a way that Black rights or Latino interests aren’t. See for instance David Aaronovitch’s recent op-ed “Defending ‘white interests’ can never be right” in the Financial Times.

I think Jews are on the wrong side of this debate, and have been for decades. Countries are not arbitrary designations on a map; and borders are not imaginary lines. Countries are defined by their people, and borders generally demarcate necessary walls between peoples. Good fences make good neighbors, as the saying goes. Globalization and mass immigration result in what amounts to demographic invasion. It is natural for host populations to resist this being forced upon them.

The Jewish support for so-called “immigrant rights” is supposed to be rooted in the Jewish experience of diaspora and constant movement. Being exiled from our home in ancient times, we should feel sympathy with others who need to leave their homes in modern times. Jews have prospered in America because it is a multicultural society with such a rainbow of peoples that no true majority exists, or will soon, if current demographic trends continue.

I think Jews should be looking at this in another way.

My ancestors hid from the Nazis and their Eastern European allies as small children. Shuttled from place to place, sometimes shielded by kind-hearted Christians, our family ultimately survived both Nazi and later Soviet occupation. But communism was not to their liking and they fled, not to the US, but to Palestine, which they then helped make into Israel.

The great story of Jewish diaspora does not end in a borderless world, it ends in Zionism, and Israel. Despite the countless mistakes the Zionists have made and continue to make, the basic reasonableness of their position remains: a people need a homeland. Israel is very far from perfect but at least it is a home that provides a haven for a people. Our great mistake is thinking this situation is unique to Jews — a point the Palestinians vainly try to remind us of.

In Michel Houellebecq’s novel Submission, France elects an Islamic-Left coalition government which supervises a national transition to Islam. The Jews of France, realizing they aren’t safe, leave. Not for the US, but for Israel. As the narrator says goodbye to his Jewish girlfriend, she asks him if he will stay. “There is no Israel for me,” he says.

People deserve their own homelands. When Rep. Steve King sent his famous tweet about “other people’s babies,” that is what he meant. Throughout its history, the US was primarily composed of White Europeans. The average demographic balance in the country was a little less than 90% White. The country’s demographic composition changed as a result of the Jewish-backed 1965 Immigration and Nationality Act. When the act was passed, its backers promised that there would be no overall change in demographic composition. But not only was that untrue, but now large swaths of the left and open-borders advocates argue that to care about this change much less take any action whatsoever try to stop or reverse it is racist.

Imagine if Israel admitted enormous numbers of non-Jewish immigrants, say Muslim Kurds, and made them citizens. I greatly admire the Kurds, and I’m sure Israeli society wouldn’t suffer from a few new Kurdish citizens. But imagine that their numbers were so many that Kurds, along with Palestinian Arabs, were projected to outnumber the Jews in 50 years. The Jews would once again be a minority. Jewish leftist, liberals, and even neocons pretend that this is different. How exactly so?

What is the moral imperative for European Whites to become the minority in their homelands? Africa’s population is projected to triple in the next century. How many African migrants must Europe take in? How many refugees from Muslim countries? Must Houellebecq’s vision become a reality?

Japan’s population is over 99% ethnic Japanese. This is in fact the norm in much of Asia, Africa, and the Middle East. Why should Japan’s ethnic homogeneity be unthreatened but France’s population altered completely? One can argue this is rooted in colonialism, but Japan also participated in an aggressive imperialism throughout East and Southeast Asia, and yet Japanese immigration laws remain strict, largely without leftist or Jewish complaint.

Jewish organizations and activists use the Holocaust as a reminder of the immorality of not taking in people under specific threat. In these specifics they are right — I think it was morally wrong to turn the St. Louis back and not arrange for later temporary safe haven for the 20,000 Jewish child refugees. Similarly, few people think that genuine war refugees fleeing for their lives from ISIS should just be treated with a shrug and left to die. But the lesson drawn is also wrong. After World War II, the Jews of Europe poured mainly into Israel. For Jews, the lesson of the Holocaust was that Jews needed a homeland, not that any particular country should take them in. Now having a homeland, Jews have no business denying other nations their own, and a people’s desire to control their demographic destiny is their fundamental and moral right. There are other ways of helping war refugees without making them a permanent presence in your nation, such as peacefully settling them in their own culture regions.

The US is not in fact a propositional nation and Jewish-American poet Emma Lazarus’ poem was not actually about immigration. As American Jews, we are essentially guests in the US, a historically White Christian nation where a Jewish minority has thrived, but has in many ways acted against the interest of our hosts. As Kevin MacDonald points out in his trilogy on Jews and Jewish ethnic activism, partially because of our fear of persecution and being noticed as an ethnic minority outgroup, Jews have promoted mass immigration and multiculturalism to devastating effect. We cannot atone for the immense historical mistake influential Jewish thinkers and activists made in doing this. But ordinary Jews can help do our part to undo these errors by at least supporting the rights of the majority to control their homeland and demographic destiny. This can be done peacefully, by removing those here illegally, helping resettle refugees back in their home countries, and making immigration laws more restrictive. In the US, reasonable organizations like VDARE have pointed towards this for decades. In Europe the situation is in many ways more desperate and here too Jews should understand and support the movements to project strong European majorities in all countries.

It is not racist for European people to want to be majorities in their own countries, any more than it is for Asians, Africans, Arabs, or Jews. It is not Hungarian supremacy that makes Hungary close its borders and try to maintain its cultural uniqueness. It is not Jewish supremacy that makes Israelis think a Jewish majority in Israel in the midst of an overwhelmingly Arab Middle East is necessary and reasonable. And it is not white supremacy that makes white Americans wish to preserve a basic, white majority, which implies no ill-treatment or legal second-class status for Americans of color.

All Jews know open borders would be a disaster for Israel. It is equally a disaster for everybody else.

(Republished from The Occidental Observer by permission of author or representative)
 
• Category: Ideology • Tags: Immigration, Jews 
Hide 82 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. john cronk says: • Website

    I hope that President Trump doesn’t allow himself to be unduly influenced by Israel and its supporters. Israel is a big problem, both for itself and the U.S., and religiously hyperbolic references to Jerusalem as its ‘eternal capital’ are worrisome.
    The best thing for people who identify as Jews is to emigrate and assimilate into western civilization, as the religious and political climate in the mideast will only bring continued danger and conflict for themselves and for the entire world.
    The U.S. does not need an ‘ally’ in the mideast which is dedicated to people of one religion and is thus a lightning rod for religious and ethnic hatred by the benighted cultures surrounding it. We need to stay out of the mideast – except for a robust diplomatic and intelligence network, in conjunction with a strong military here at home capable of protecting us from any aggression that may be directed toward our country.
    Israel has done a wonderful job solving the technical problems encountered in carving a country out of a desert, but the idea of a nation dedicated to a religion was flawed from the start. What they defend militarily, and would like the U.S. to as well, is doomed. Not only dangerous, wasteful and ultimately unwinnable in a practical sense, the fight to establish and preserve this kind of state is ethically indefensible.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  2. Cyrano says:

    Shuttled from place to place, sometimes shielded by kind-hearted Christians, our family ultimately survived both Nazi and later Soviet occupation.

    Poor Jews. Must have been really tough for them surviving – especially the Soviet “occupation”. If there is anyone that they should be thankful to for surviving in any kind of numbers in WW2 Europe it’s the Soviet “occupiers”. But as Stalin used to say: “Gratitude is a dog’s disease”.

    Anyway, the reason for the fake Jewish cosmopolitanism is not because they feel too sympathetic towards the third world immigrants to whom they supposedly relate from any kind of personal experience.

    The reason why Jewish elites are pushing for unlimited third world immigration is because they believe that once the western societies become intolerant towards immigration, the next on the list to experience intolerance would be the Jews – based on historical experiences. Their cosmopolitanism is far more pragmatic than it appears at first glance.

    The Jewish elites want to ensure steady stream of third world immigrants as a proof that Western societies remain tolerant and that the Jews shouldn’t worry that they might be a future target of possible holocausts or similar undesired events. The third world immigrants are canaries in the mine for the Jews, and if for some reason they start dropping dead in the rich mine that the West represents, then it’s a signal for the Jewish miners that is time for them to stop (under)mining via overexploitation the rich mine of the West and to start immediate evacuation.

    • Agree: druid
    • Replies: @Dave Pinsen
    , @Kirt
    , @Boris N
  3. Countries are not arbitrary designations on a map; and borders are not imaginary lines.

    This is true, but not for the reasons you cite; it has nothing to do with demographics.

    Countries are not containers of ethnic identities; countries are autonomous (sovereign) self-governing communities, with their own rules, their own economies, and often with their own philosophies.

    These sovereign communities have a perfect right to regulate immigration; while of course individual members and organization/institutions inside these communities have a perfect right to advocate their favorite immigration policies, including the ‘open borders’. None of this has anything to do with your (or anyone else’s) ethnic self-identification.

    • Replies: @romar
    , @Ace
    , @Mark Presco
  4. Vires says:

    http://forward.com/opinion/352854/donald-trumps-plan-for-immigrants-should-scare-the-hell-out-of-jews/ (and they should pack up and run to Israel)

    The agenda is clear to me

    Israel has a known demographic problem, on the one hand it has almost 20% of Arab population out breeding ethnic Jews:

    https://www.jewishpolicycenter.org/2008/02/29/the-threat-from-israels-arab-population/

    And on the other a number of young Israelis (big enough for articles on the subject being written in the NYT and Haaretz) are leaving Israel for places like Amsterdam and Berlin

    http://www.haaretz.com/opinion/.premium-1.622367

    https://www.nytimes.com/2014/10/17/world/middleeast/in-exodus-from-israel-to-berlin-young-nations-fissures-show.html?_r=0

    Now a long standing goal and strategy of Zionism has been and is ingather exiles from the Diaspora to Eretz Yisrael

    http://blogs.timesofisrael.com/zionisms-ultimate-goal/

    There are around 2.5 million Jews living in Europe. What a better way there is to achieve said goal than by flooding Europe with Muslim “anti-semites” i.e. increase anti-semitism in Europe while getting far right governments in the European countries such an invasion will surely promote? Swedish and French Jews are already emigrating and Bibi is shamelessly asking them to come back to Israel

    Immediately following the killing of a Jewish security guard at a bar mitzvah celebration in Copenhagen, prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel called on all European Jews to mass-emigrate, explaining “Israel is your home”.

    http://europe.newsweek.com/jews-denmark-and-sweden-assert-right-stay-put-307347?rm=eu

  5. Vires says:

    But this is obviously not the only reason. High Muslim population in Europe and the US and rubbing European and American noses in no-go areas – guettos, Sharia, honor killings, FGM, terrorism and Rotherham and Cologne style incidents that Muslim “enrichment” comes with will no doubt “help” Europeans and Americans to understand the Muslim problem Israel has with Palestinians, and therefore Americans and Europeans will be more likely to support Israel fight against “Islamic Terrorism” ie ongoing apartheid of Palestinians and the wars the US is waging and will wage against Israel’s adversaries in the Greater Middle East (Syria, Iraq, Iran, Lybia) while comprehending why there is no way to negotiate with Palestinians and Muslims in general and why Israel should be the major power in the Greater Middle East (Israel is the only real secular “Western” democracy in the area etc), instead of those religiously fanatics and low IQ tribalist Muslims.

    To illustrate my point, everyone can see now some Neocons, Zionist and Crypto-Zionist “influencers” (read: PR agitators) at work:

    – the Gatestone Institute
    – Daniel Pipes
    – Bill Maher
    – Sam Harris
    – Gad Saad (youtube Gadfather)
    – Ezra Levant (the Rebel Media)

    and others who on the one hand are righteously condemning and criticizing Islam and the European politicians allowing so many “refugees” in their countries, and on the other either blatantly pushing for immigration and encouraging politicians to accept more (good/moderate Muslims without being picky, of course i.e. all Muslims) “refugees”, or dancing around the fact that major Jewish organizations, Lobbies and other groups of pressure with great political influence are actively pushing and lobbying for allowing more immigration to Europe – knowing full well most of those immigrants are Muslim and incompatible with Western culture, and will create conflicts and division within Western societies.

    The following video is just a clear example. Gad Saad, professor of Concordia University in Montreal, a Zionist and fierce critic of Islam, multiculturalism and the refugee invasion of Europe. He has a youtube channel with 70k+ followers.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gad_Saad

    When confronted with the fact that major Jewish organizations and other pressure groups in Sweden are lobbying and pressuring the Government to accept more Muslim refugees, he, instead of being puzzled by the fact such a contradictory agenda is being pushed (maybe he was unaware) or condemning such a foolish agenda as he condemns the Swedish bureaucrats (maybe he is aware such actions from the Jewish organizations are taking place)
    he is clearly caught off guard and comes up with the most bizarre justification you will ever hear: the “Dihmmi” status of the leaders of major Jewish organizations and lobbies in the Swedish “Islamic society” forces them to accept more Muslim refugees and remain silent not to ofend the Muslims already there?!

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dhimmi

    See by yourself and try to understand what the apologetic good man is trying to say.

    minute 37:39

    • Replies: @Dave Pinsen
    , @Glaivester
    , @tjm
  6. romar says:
    @Mao Cheng Ji

    Good points, but expressed with unnecessary harshness.
    Indeed, while some nations are racially or colour-wise homogeneous, many more are composite. And African countries are definitely composite – except for one who just looks at skin colour.
    Hardly any African nation is mono-ethnic, and many are multi-ethnic. So long as they have wise and far-sighted leadership, a mere handful of decades suffice to give them a nascent national, supra-ethnic identify.
    The same applies to European nations, including those that today look homogeneous.
    The main issue in immigration is not colour or religion, but border control: let in a few at a time, help them get used to the local culture and customs, before you take in more. And make sure you have the resources to give them a proper start in their new life.
    Certainly it is foolish to take in hundreds of thousands at a go – except where they need minimal adaptation, as in the case of Russia taking in Ukrainian refugees: cultural differences are almost nil, and there was enough money and adequate human help to settle them.
    As for the excitement of the Jews in the EU and the US, their reasons are well presented in this paper. There may be others also – perhaps less printable for their deliberate nefariousness…
    Thank you, Marcus.

  7. @romar

    Cultural nativism is a part of it, but I don’t believe it’s the main/defining part.

    Economics. If all segments of the British society benefited from neoliberal policies of the EU, there would be no brexit. Economics is the driver, and cultural nativism is a common way to express frustration… in my opinion…

  8. @romar

    “Hardly any African nation is mono-ethnic, and many are multi-ethnic.”

    Not a good argument by example. I cannot think of an African country that is not characterized by some combination of ruthless dictatorship, corruption, squalor, rampant criminality, economic stagnation, and grotesque levels of economic, social, and political inequality.

    “So long as they have wise and far-sighted leadership, a mere handful of decades suffice to give them a nascent national, supra-ethnic identify.”

    A proposition the falseness of whose predicate is confirmed by an empirical evaluation of its conclusion. The “nations” of sub-Saharan Africa have had well over a half century to develop such identities and all are still mired to one degree or another in ethnic factionalism and civil wars.

  9. songbird says:

    The appeal to imperialism is as phony as the zeroth ammendment. It’s just a tailored rationalization of leftist ideology, which is measured and cut to every susceptible white society.

    There aren’t any Ainu in Japan anymore, but no one is given a guilt trip over it and told Japan is an immigrant nation because the Japanese aren’t susceptible to it.

    Europeans were settling Taiwan before the Chinese. The Chinese, initially settling under them, helped kick them out and took over the country. Yet, this is actually used as a buttress-excuse for their own sovereignty from the mainland, instead of as an trojan horse against their sovereignty.

    Perhaps, the most spectacularly disengenious argument is being made to remake Ireland. Ireland is a country that has been occuppied in some fashion for 800 years, the native Irish have, at times, been greatly persecuted. The country has known ethnic strife, for literally hundreds of years. Yet they are told that they must take in anyone because so many people emigrated from Ireland.

    • Agree: Anonym
    • Replies: @Anonym
    , @Anonymous
  10. Every nation has a treasure. It is called National treasure. Creations in philosophy, poetry, prose, music, visual art and other arts are the true National treasure. Many Jews living in other nations participated in creation of these national treasures. Although Jews participated in creations these treasures, these created treasures newer become Jewish treasures, they remained treasures of the nations where Jews did live.
    What does it tell you? Think about it!

    • Replies: @jacques sheete
    , @drifter
  11. wayfarer says:

    There are dire consequences of corrupt immigration policies, and special interest politics.

    A pathetic political paradox is now occurring in America. As puppet politicians controlled by a minority of wealthy crying constituents leave the door of illegal immigration wide open, formulate sanctuary city laws, and roll out red carpets for foreign economic refugees – homeless Americans in unprecedented numbers are facing cash fines, confiscation of personal property, criminal records, and jail sentences – for the “crime” of not being able to afford a greedy landlord’s unreasonable rent or a selfish banker’s steep mortgage.

    National Coalition for the Homeless
    http://nationalhomeless.org/

    A Dream Denied: The Criminalization of Homelessness in U.S. Cities
    http://www.nationalhomeless.org/publications/crimreport/meanest.html

    Swept Away: Reporting on the Encampment Closure Crisis
    http://nationalhomeless.org/swept-away/

    10 Most Ridiculous Anti-Homeless Laws
    http://nationalhomeless.org/WordPress/2011/07/the-10-most-ridiculous-anti-homeless-laws/
    http://nationalhomeless.org/WordPress/2011/07/the-10-most-ridiculous-anti-homeless-laws-part-ii/

    • Replies: @animalogic
  12. Wally says: • Website

    This is an easy one.

    1. Indeed, it’s revealing that leftists / Zionists support Israeli immigration laws which specify JEWS ONLY, while those same types demand massive 3rd world immigration into the US & Europe.

    It’s also revealing that we don’t see the leftists / Zionists criticizing Israel’s very real WALL.

    2. Yet more propaganda about ‘Nazis’ and so called ‘holocau$t survivors’ from the author.
    The mere fact that we have so many “survivors” when it’s claimed that ‘the Germans tried to kill every Jew they could get their hands on’ blows away the scam.
    Their massive numbers are living testimony to the fraudulence of the impossible ‘6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers’.

    There were the ‘Nazis’ with the mythological ‘6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers’ and there were the ‘Nazis’ without the mythological ’6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers’.

    The ‘6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers’ are scientifically impossible frauds.
    see the ‘holocaust’ scam debunked here:
    http://codoh.com
    No name calling, level playing field debate here:
    http://forum.codoh.com

    “One should not ask, how this mass murder was made possible. It was technically possible, because it happened. This has to be the obligatory starting-point for any historical research regarding this topic. We would just like to remind you: There is no debate regarding the existence of the gas chambers, and there can never be one.”
    – endorsed by 34 “reputable historians” and published in the French daily Le Monde on February 21, 1979

    • Replies: @annamaria
    , @anarchyst
  13. Dave Pinsen says: • Website
    @Cyrano

    I hope the author of the piece read your comment. Here he is, buying into the Kevin MacDonald view 100% (which makes him more Catholic than The Derb on this issue), and after all that, you lead off with this:

    Poor Jews. Must have been really tough for them surviving – especially the Soviet “occupation”. If there is anyone that they should be thankful to for surviving in any kind of numbers in WW2 Europe it’s the Soviet “occupiers”. But as Stalin used to say: “Gratitude is a dog’s disease”.

    Some people you can’t make happy, even if you agree with all of their premises.

  14. Dave Pinsen says: • Website
    @Vires

    Ezra Levant is pushing for mass immigration? Do you have a link supporting that? I follow him on Twitter and he seems to be a huge Trumpist for a Canadian.

    • Replies: @Maj. Kong
    , @Vires
  15. Quote: “All Jews know open borders would be a disaster for Israel. It is equally a disaster for everybody else.”

    Are you suggesting they don’t know this already?

    Loyal Jews support Sanhedrin Talmudic policies, whether explicitly expressed or not. The Talmud declares Jews to be AT WAR with their host communities. They are commanded to “enslave by ususry” and “utterly destroy” the gentile enemy. Jews at the centre know this. Other Jews just comply, follow orders etc … the usual gutless submission to evil practiced by the majority of the gentile target population.

    • Replies: @druid
  16. Ace says:
    @Mao Cheng Ji

    That is nonsense. Western civilization is a white civilization. Western nations were created by white people.

    • Replies: @Zenarchy
  17. Anonym says:

    An honest and quite courageous article, without being self-hating. Well done.

    • Replies: @International Jew
  18. Anonym says:
    @songbird

    Europeans were settling Taiwan before the Chinese. The Chinese, initially settling under them, helped kick them out and took over the country. Yet, this is actually used as a buttress-excuse for their own sovereignty from the mainland, instead of as an trojan horse against their sovereignty.

    I didn’t know that, but that’s a great point, an excellent point. A lot of people have the idea that East Asians are these peaceful people, just because they are low violent crime, I guess. And a lot of white men have yellow fever. But if you look at examples from history, it can be a different story when diaspora becomes majority population. Something we ignore at our peril.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Taiwan

    The Taiwanese Aboriginal tribes who were previously allied with the Dutch against the Chinese during the Guo Huaiyi Rebellion in 1652 turned against the Dutch during the Siege of Fort Zeelandia and defected to Koxinga’s Chinese forces.[29] The Aboriginals (Formosans) of Sincan defected to Koxinga after he offered them amnesty, the Sincan Aboriginals then proceeded to work for the Chinese and behead Dutch people in executions, the frontier aboriginals in the mountains and plains also surrendered and defected to the Chinese on May 17, 1661, celebrating their freedom from compulsory education under the Dutch rule by hunting down Dutch people and beheading them and trashing their Christian school textbooks.[30]

    I have a feeling if the British had colonized Formosa, they would have done a better job than the Dutch. It would still be mostly European, though probably with a cuck baby boomer PM talking about how successful multiculturalism is.

    The Aboriginals often slaughtered the shipwrecked crews of western ships. In 1867 the entire American crew of the Rover were massacred by aboriginals in the Rover incident. When the Americans launched the punitive Formosa Expedition in retaliation, the aboriginals defeated the Americans and forced them to retreat, killing an American marine while suffering no casualties themselves.

  19. Kirt says:
    @Cyrano

    A Hungarian Jewish lady of my acquaintance managed to survive both the German Nazis and the Hungarian Arrow Cross by her own ingenuity and street smarts, but was gang raped by the Soviet occupiers. Needless to say she was not very grateful to Stalin and was as much against Communism as Nazism.

    • Replies: @Cyrano
  20. Maj. Kong says:
    @Dave Pinsen

    Ask Kevin Michael Grace (@KMGVictoria), about that. They appear to know (and despise) each other personally.

  21. Israel is very far from perfect but at least it is a home that provides a haven for a people.

    How many havens do “a people” need? Why isn’t the US haven enough?

    My ancestors hid from the Nazis and their Eastern European allies as small children. Shuttled from place to place…

    Good grief, how many times do we have to have that threadbare concept shoved in our faces? I got news for ya…given the actions of the Zionists in Palestine and the mafiosi in the US, fewer and fewer people can muster much sympathy for that victim card any longer.

    From what I can gather, Nazis had plenty of support from Zionist collaborators and besides, if getting and keeping certain groups of people out of a country is fine for the Israelis, then why was it a crime when the Nazis wanted a homogeneous society?

  22. @Ilyana_Rozumova

    Although Jews participated in creations these treasures, these created treasures newer become Jewish treasures, they remained treasures of the nations where Jews did live.

    What happened to the Czar’s and the church’s treasures and property about a century ago?

    What happened to a lot of Europe’s treasures during and after the World Wars?

    Who were responsible for the thefts and wars?

    What does it tell you? Think about it!

    You really need to provide proof for this assertion:

    they remained treasures of the nations where Jews did live.

    • Replies: @Delinquent Snail
  23. Ram says:

    “Defending ‘white interests’ can never be right”

    Quite. Who do they think they are. Zionists ?

  24. Boris N says:
    @Cyrano

    Poor Jews. Must have been really tough for them surviving – especially the Soviet “occupation”.

    1) Invent an unrealistic delirious ideology.
    2) Make a revolution and impose your ideology on Gentiles.
    3) Create a misanthropic Absurdistan and kill 20+ million Gentiles.
    4) Blame everything on the Gentiles.
    5) PROFIT!

  25. TheBoom says:

    Pathetic article. Jews care more about destroying white societies than they do about Israel. they believe whites are their primary enemy. They will only find out too late that whites are the most pro-Jewish group on the planet and the only ones who will tolerate Jews playing such a dominant role while working to undermine the majority.

    • Replies: @Jake
  26. Jake says:
    @TheBoom

    It is true that white Christians are the only people in the world who manage to suffer Jews for a long period. The are two main reasons: one is that being racially and culturally European is to be the most open and accepting in the world of ‘Other’ peoples. It is the exact opposite of the Leftist delusion. The other reason is that Christianity makes Jews our kin by adoption.

    Either or both of those are not merely fine but beneficial to white Christian society if they are kept under control by historic Christian doctrines and identity. They are insanely out of control now, and have been increasingly since at least the dawn of the Enlightenment, precisely because the Modern age is in full rebellion against Christendom and its morals and identities.

    As in every era and locale in which Jews have amassed great wealth and resulting political clout, Jews today are sowing the seed of their next destruction. And now that seed is principally about Moslems. This is the era of the highest % of Moslems who desire the total extermination of Jews. Most Moslems are not such people, but hundreds of millions of Moslems around the globe are. And they are preparing now to start taking over many Western countries by democratic vote after mass immigration. And then they will strike.

    If the good ole boys of white middle America have been totally dispossessed and demoralized, as Leftists and Neocon Jews both want, who is going to help defend Jews from the Moslem hordes?

    Jews who want the West filled with Moslems are suicidally insane.

  27. Mark Presco says: • Website
    @Mao Cheng Ji

    The main problem with your argument is that most African and Middle Eastern countries are fake countries, created by European colonial powers as they divvied up the world.

    They are all flying apart because of ethnic and sectarian self interests.

    Colonialism and Neo- Colonialism must all be undone. We must all live with our own people in our own cultures.

    • Replies: @Mao Cheng Ji
  28. Borders for me, but not for thee.
    Pride for me, but not for thee.
    Free speech for me, but not for thee.
    Nukes for me, but not for thee.

    Plus

    Guilt for thee, but not for me.
    Social disintegration for thee, but not for me.
    Extradition for thee, but not for me.
    Altruism for thee, but not for me.

    Equals

    Power and wealth for me.
    Poverty and subjugation for thee.

  29. Ed says:
    @romar

    This is correct. My parents are Ghanaian and it has been noted that Ghana has the most uniformity among Sub-Saharan countries in terms of ethnicity. Yet even here the dominant ethnic group, the Akans, don’t constitute a majority. Also the Akans themselves are divided into tribes which are also potent dividers.

    Nigeria has about 200 or so ethnic groups & languages and it shows.

  30. FLgeezer says:
    @Jake

    Excellent post. Thank you Jake.

  31. druid says:
    @ThereisaGod

    So true, and this what keeps getting forgotten or unmentioned! History shows that wherever they go, they become financially powerful by whatever reasons (gambling – Vegas, drugs/alcohol – New York during and after prohibition, etc.), then use that dirty money to bully and influence their host societies who eventually see the truth and get sick of them. (!) now.

  32. @Jake

    The other reason is that Christianity makes Jews our kin by adoption.

    “How do I know this? The [Jewish] bible tells me so.”

    Ever think about that proposition more critically?

    IF E Michael Jones’s arguments hold weight, that the essence of “Jew” is the rejection of logos – Jesus;

    and

    IF Jason Reza Jorjani’s arguments hold weight, that Iranian (Aryan) culture is the foundation of Western culture and Zoroaster propounded the guiding ideas of Iranian culture;

    and

    IF it is true that Cyrus, the Zoroaster-worshiping leader of the Iranian people is the ONLY historical figure in the entire Old Testament;

    then you have to start to ask yourself, What is the basis for my belief in “kinship by adoption” between Christians and Jews?

    Is it Jews who insist upon this “kinship” for their own reasons, devoid of rational as well as authentic historical basis, similar to the way that Jews insist on a special relationship between USA and Israel?

    Walter Grundmann led a movement in war-era Germany to separate Christianity as expressed by German Christians, from a Hebrew matrix. He and his movement are, of course, branded as “Nazis” and “antisemitic.”

    It’s not easy to find material about Grundmann’s movement, in English, that is not filtered through the Jewish demonization of Germany filters, but to the extent that I understand Grundmann’s project, I think his effort was similar to that of Thomas Jefferson, who explained in an 1803 letter to Dr. Benjamin Rush —

    [MORE]

    To the corruptions of Christianity I am indeed opposed, but not to the genuine precepts of Jesus himself. I am a Christian, in the only sense in which he wished anyone to be: sincerely attached to his doctrines in preference to all others, ascribing to himself every human excellence, and believing he never claimed any other.

    In his comparative analysis of Jewish doctrines and those of Jesus, Jefferson observed:

    II. Jews.
    1. Their system was Deism; that is, the belief in one only God. But their ideas of him and of his attributes were degrading and injurious.
    2. Their Ethics were not only imperfect, but often irreconcilable with the sound dictates of reason and morality, as they respect intercourse with those around us; and repulsive and anti-social, as respecting other nations. They needed reformation, therefore, in an eminent degree.

    III. Jesus.
    In this state of things among the Jews, Jesus appeared. His parentage was obscure; his condition poor; his education null; his natural endowments great; his life correct and innocent: he was meek, benevolent, patient, firm, disinterested, and of the sublimest eloquence.

    . . .
    [T]he doctrines he really delivered . . . have been still more disfigured by the corruptions of schismatizing followers, who have found an interest in sophisticating and perverting the simple doctrines he taught, by engrafting on them the mysticisms of a Grecian sophist, frittering them into subtleties, and obscuring them with jargon, until they have caused good men to reject the whole in disgust, and to view Jesus himself as an impostor.

    Notwithstanding these disadvantages, a system of morals is presented to us which, if filled up in the style and spirit of the rich fragments he left us, would be the most perfect and sublime that has ever been taught by man.

    . . .

    1. He corrected the Deism of the Jews, confirming them in their belief of one only God, and giving them juster notions of His attributes and government.

    2. His moral doctrines, relating to kindred and friends were more pure and perfect than those of the most correct of the philosophers, and greatly more so than those of the Jews; and they went far beyond both in inculcating universal philanthropy, not only to kindred and friends, to neighbors and countrymen, but to all mankind, gathering all into one family under the bonds of love, charity, peace, common wants and common aids. A development of this head will evince the peculiar superiority of the system of Jesus over all others.

    3. The precepts of philosophy, and of the Hebrew code, laid hold of actions only. He pushed his scrutinies into the heart of man; erected his tribunal in the region of his thoughts, and purified the waters at the fountain head.

    4.He taught, emphatically, the doctrines of a future state, which was either doubted or disbelieved by the Jews, and wielded it with efficacy as an important incentive, supplementary to the other motives to moral conduct.

    http://www.angelfire.com/co/JeffersonBible/jeffbsyl.html

    Jews and Christians, kin by adoption?

    Who adopted whom?
    Isn’t it the case that it is Jews who insist upon a linkage to Christianity, while at the same time not only rejecting but actively seeking to undermine and derogate the essential facts, beliefs and practices of Jesus.

    Jesusians — those who, like Jefferson (and, I presume, Grundmann) seek and seek to live by “the genuine precepts of Jesus himself, should summon the courage to be as forthright and determined in defending their doctrinal convictions and practices as Jews are in undermining them.

    • Replies: @Sherman
    , @Sam Shama
    , @geokat62
  33. The Jewish people need to ask themselves why it is, that throughout history, no matter where they want they would always end up being loathed, hated and despised by the local population no matter how small the Jewish were in numbers.

    Could it be that the Jew has a cultural tendency to view all there is as his, with any non Jews seen as a blemish upon that which he sees as his. It takes a very sick kind of person to invite themselves into someone else home and start demanding that everything be re-arranged to his liking while constantly saying that the front door should be open to anyone who wished to live in the house without a shred of care for what the owner of the house says about it.

    The Jews never wished for the Holocaust, but I fear this time around they have pushed things so far that a second Holocaust will blanket Europe again. The only question is who will be going into the gas chambers this time around when the national majorities have enough of everyone telling them they have no say in the future of their own homeland.

    And who will stop it if all the nations decide as one that these people have got to vanish from Europe no matter what.

  34. @Mark Presco

    The main problem with your argument is that most African and Middle Eastern countries are fake countries, created by European colonial powers as they divvied up the world.

    All countries start as ‘fake’; look at Italy. It takes time (and effort) for the population to internalize their identity as a citizen and to elevate it above their ethnic and regional identities. It takes generations.

    • Replies: @Mark Presco
  35. woodNfish says:

    The Jewish elites want to ensure steady stream of third world immigrants as a proof that Western societies remain tolerant and that the Jews shouldn’t worry that they might be a future target of possible holocausts or similar undesired events.

    Another holocaust is exactly what they are going to get if they don’t stop this push.

  36. Cyrano says:
    @Kirt

    Then, I guess she must’ve been really mad at her own kind, because they practically invented communism.

    Actually that’s one thing that I will always admire the Jews for, because I think that communism is the greatest humanist idea of all times. Despite the numerous misinterpretations via Stalinism, Leninism, Trotskyism, Multiculturalism and Globalism, it is still the most humane idea ever.

    One day the humanity will find the right formula to interpret that great idea instead of the current perversions that are even worse than previous incarnations of communism. I think that the original idea was for equality among people within a nation, primarily economic equality – taking into consideration the difference in their abilities. And also equality among nations, but not mixing individuals from every possible nation trying to create a supernation.

    Multiculturalism is simply racial communism without economic equality and globalism is communism for the elites without equality for the classes below the top 1%.

    But we already know that the elites are communists towards each other – they see themselves as equal no matter what nation they come from, but not equal with the bottom 99%. The idea is for the ruling elite to fool the great unwashed that at least they are trying to usher some sort of communism without touching the big one – economic equality for all.

    • Replies: @MarkinLA
    , @Kirt
    , @Miro23
  37. Sherman says:
    @SolontoCroesus

    I had no idea you were such a theologian, Chuck.

  38. MarkinLA says:
    @Cyrano

    One day the humanity will find the right formula to interpret that great idea instead of the current perversions that are even worse than previous incarnations of communism.

    How do you determine who is someone naturally deficient such that the rest of us should take part of the load off him and who is a scum-bucket taking us for fools who should have his ass kicked on a regular basis to get him to work?

  39. annamaria says:
    @Wally

    ” Indeed, it’s revealing that leftists / Zionists support Israeli immigration laws which specify JEWS ONLY, while those same types demand massive 3rd world immigration into the US & Europe.
    It’s also revealing that we don’t see the leftists / Zionists criticizing Israel’s very real WALL.”

    A clear case of cognitive blindness when tribal mentality trumps facts and logic.
    It is highly improbable that the inflow of muslims to western world has been planned to improve the image of Jews or for some other fancy purposes. This would give too much credit to the incompetent “deciders” in the US government.
    The ongoing humanitarian catastrophe (that threatens to become a civilizational catastrophe) is an unintended consequence of a common predatory imperialism married to the mythology of Eretz Israel. Whatever trauma has been experienced by Jews during WWII, it is no different from the trauma of other victims of the same war. The Zionists has built their castle on the injustice and other peoples’ blood, a shaky ground for a 20th century project. The story of Jewish colonization of Palestine (Nakba) cancels the lesson of Jewish Holocaust. Like an ancient tragedy, one crime leads to another and then to another. This is how the US has arrived to a point in time when the US resources have been spent on the mass slaughter of civilians of all ages in the Middle East and on arming and supporting various terrorist organization in the Middle East, from IDF to ISIS and Al Qaeda. The European “democratic” vassals and Saudi despots have joined the US in arming and supporting the religious fanatics against sovereign ME states. Iraq has been destroyed, Libya has been destroyed and robbed, Syria has been destroyed and is barely surviving in a fight against the implementations of Israel “project.”
    No, the destruction of western civilization was not planned. – The stupidity of the current process is due to the unfortunate confluence of interests of war-profiteered, Israel-firsters, and regular imperialists (the financial sector leading the charge ideologically). The overlapping is obvious.

  40. Mark Presco says: • Website
    @Mao Cheng Ji

    Bad example, there are 6 active separatist movements in Italy right now spearheaded by these parties: The Friulian Front, Independence Front Lombardy, Sardinia Nation, Sicilian Independentist Movement, South Tyrolean secessionist movement and Liga Veneta. Basically northern Italians want to succeed from Italy.

    There are separatist movements all over the world. Please don’t make me spell them all out for you.

    The USA is not a fake nation despite the Civil War. Every State entered voluntarily. However, it will balkanize because of all the disparate ethnic groups. And just so you know, balkanization refers to another fake country, Yugoslavia, which blew apart rather violently.

  41. Vires says:
    @Dave Pinsen

    either blatantly pushing for immigration and encouraging politicians to accept more (good/moderate Muslims without being picky, of course i.e. all Muslims) “refugees”, or dancing around the fact that major Jewish organizations, Lobbies and other groups of pressure with great political influence are actively pushing and lobbying for allowing more immigration to Europe

    Not saying he is. Ezra Levant is basically criticising Islam, multiculturalism, mass immigration and the Western governments that support them – without admitting and denouncing the role influential Jewish organizations, lobbies and Israel itself are playing in creating the problem (starting with the fact that the “refugee crisis” was a product of the conflicts created and abetted by the Neocons to protect Israel and make Israel more powerful in the GME)

    He is dishonest intellectually, either he is afraid to talk or part of the scheme.

  42. Kirt says:
    @Cyrano

    Poor old Marx! Doomed to be misinterpreted by everyone who has ever claimed to interpret him. Lucky for him and (I guess) the rest of us that you finally came along and got it right.

    • Replies: @Cyrano
  43. Glaivester says: • Website
    @Vires

    and therefore Americans and Europeans will be more likely to support Israel fight against “Islamic Terrorism” ie ongoing apartheid of Palestinians

    Given the current state of South Africa since white rule ended, why should anyone be insulted by being called an “apartheid state.”

    • Replies: @jacques sheete
  44. The USA is not a fake nation despite the Civil War. Every State entered voluntarily.

    Then why couldn’t they leave voluntarily or without the threat of violence?

    And do you really think each state did so voluntarily? Did their respective ruling elites have anything to do with it?

    • Replies: @Mark Presco
  45. @Glaivester

    Given the current state of South Africa since white rule ended, why should anyone be insulted by being called an “apartheid state.”

    Because, given the state of the state before it ended…?

    What does post hoc ergo propter hoc mean?

    Does correlation = causation?

  46. Jason Liu says:

    But I don’t think Jews are motivated by morals, history, or even a desire for a better future. I think they’re motivated by a pathological sense of altruism where they feel compelled to sympathize with “the little guy”, at the expense of reason, morality, and anything else. They act like neurotic, insecure people who believe that their own security can only be won by ostentatious acts of virtue, so others will think them good and reciprocate.

    These people need a good shrink. Preferably not a Jewish one.

    • Replies: @Miro23
  47. Miro23 says:
    @romar

    The main issue in immigration is not colour or religion, but border control: let in a few at a time, help them get used to the local culture and customs, before you take in more. And make sure you have the resources to give them a proper start in their new life.

    What’s missing here is a discussion of nationality.

    Many European countries are full of foreigners with “foreign resident” status, that allows them to work, start businesses etc. but not vote in national elections, hold government positions or becomes citizens (passport holders).

    It works fine. Foreign Residents can speak the language and understand the country, having lived there for decades but they are still Foreign Residents (i.e. guests in someone else’s country). They uncontroversially accept that they are foreigners and not nationals – and usually live socially apart from the national population.

    If people who are really “Foreign Residents” are given passports and the vote, it just weakens the host society and creates fake or dual loyalties.

  48. Miro23 says:
    @Jason Liu

    I haven’t noticed that Jews are motivated by a “pathological sense of altruism” – that’s more of a post WWI Anglo thing.

  49. Anon • Disclaimer says:

    Gad Saad: This fellow is projecting Jewish values on to Muslims. Dhimmis are ahle a dhimma, people who the state is responsible for . The jaziya is applied to non-Muslims, because they don’t pay Zaakt and Ushr, while the Muslims have to pay those taxes and are responsible for defending the country. As usual this Zionist lies. What is doing in Canada
    Why did he not go Israel? Is he there in Canada to mount White Canadian women, by first getting sympathy by telling fictitious Holocaust stories? In actuality his family enjoyed Muslim hospitality in Lebanon.

  50. Mark Presco says: • Website
    @jacques sheete

    The Civil war was fought to stop traitorous white business owners from continuing to infest this country with black people. Exactly the same kind of traitorous white business owners who are screwing over the white working class today by importing hordes of cheap third world labor.

    The slave problem became the North’s problem as blacks sought freedom in their states.

    I believe Lincoln was assassinated by southern sympathizers because had a plan to remove blacks from this country. This must be true because all talk of removal ceased and the South kept it’s cheap black labor. Southern agro-business then established tenant farming, slavery by another name, and added to it the poor whites who survived the war.

    The Confederate flag does not stand for white pride, it represents traitorous white agro-business. We think southern rednecks are as dumb as dirt because the fat cats got them to do their fighting and dying for them, so they could continue to screw over the white working class.

    Apparently only another civil war will stop the fat cats from screwing over the white working class by importing hordes of cheap third world labor.

  51. Cyrano says:
    @Kirt

    No, I think you’re wrong. I think that you and your Hungarian Jewish lady friend interpreted Marx and communism way better than me. The only thing that you desperately miss is the soothing gentle hand of the Nazis to make everything right.

  52. Miro23 says:
    @Cyrano

    I think that the original idea was for equality among people within a nation, primarily economic equality – taking into consideration the difference in their abilities.

    “From each according to his abilities, to each according to his needs”.

    Marx was imagining a super abundance of factory produced goods with more than enough for everyone, with little work, and the remaining question being the division of the surplus between classes.

    We’re not yet in his world of superabundance and minimal work , but you’re right that it may come to pass – with the problem that, “From each according to his abilities, to each according to his needs” seems to imply either a high level of national/ethnic unity (i.e. done willingly within the same “family”) or Totalitarianism (enforced non-democratically).

    How else is the person with ability going to provide welfare for the needy/incapable/lazy?

    And since Multiculturalism is nationally and ethnically divisive (i.e. it breaks up the “family”) then the suggestion is that;

    National Unity = Voluntary Socialism.

    National Disunity (Multiculturalism) = Enforced Socialism (Totalitarianism) = a collapsed society based on fear with a small class of elite enforcers who are probably opportunistic SINOS (Socialists in Name Only) redirecting the surplus to themselves.

  53. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:
    @songbird

    The Ainu and Taiwanese aborigines are racial kin of the Japanese and Chinese. So it’s not analogous to instances of inter-racial imperialism.

  54. Svigor says:

    Thanks for this, Alethia.

    I think Jews are on the wrong side of this debate, and have been for decades.

    They’re on both sides of the debate (at the same time, I mean). Strong borders for Israel and the Jews, no borders for their traditional hosts, the Europeans.

    They’re on one side of the Jewish Supremacy (AKA, “is it good for the Jews?”) debate, though; the Jewish side.

    The great story of Jewish diaspora does not end in a borderless world, it ends in Zionism, and Israel. Despite the countless mistakes the Zionists have made and continue to make, the basic reasonableness of their position remains: a people need a homeland.

    Well, that would be nice, anyway.

    The real Zionist position is: the Jewish people need a homeland; the Jews’ favorite hosts, the Europeans, must not have a homeland.

    Imagine if Israel admitted enormous numbers of non-Jewish immigrants, say Muslim Kurds, and made them citizens. I greatly admire the Kurds, and I’m sure Israeli society wouldn’t suffer from a few new Kurdish citizens. But imagine that their numbers were so many that Kurds, along with Palestinian Arabs, were projected to outnumber the Jews in 50 years. The Jews would once again be a minority. Jewish leftist, liberals, and even neocons pretend that this is different. How exactly so?

    Imagine if Israel admitted large numbers of high-IQ Chinamen. China could part with millions of them without noticing the difference. Israeli society would greatly benefit from such intelligent people, who would improve the quality of Israeli research, manufacturing, education, governance, etc. In short, the Chinamen would improve Israel wherever they were found; they would be an improvement over Israeli Jews, wherever they were found. And their lives would be improved by the move as well, meaning they’re there for the taking.

    Given the usual Jewish assumptions foisted on the West, anyway.

    But, no taking. Odd, that.

    Now having a homeland, Jews have no business denying other nations their own

    And yet Jews actually form the vanguard of the open-borders, multicult, diversity, etc., movement in America. And are firmly in the 5th column in Europe, too.

    It is not Jewish supremacy that makes Israelis think a Jewish majority in Israel in the midst of an overwhelmingly Arab Middle East is necessary and reasonable.

    No, but the double-whammy of strong borders for Israeli Jews, and championing no borders for Europeans, that is Jewish Supremacy.

  55. The Jewish support for so-called “immigrant rights” is supposed to be rooted in the Jewish experience of diaspora and constant movement.

    In other words, it’s rooted in Jewish rootlessness.

    But communism was not to their liking and they fled …

    They liked the USSR just fine before Stalin took over!

    … and yet Japanese immigration laws remain strict, largely without leftist or Jewish complaint.

    I suppose that Japanese Jews, unlike our own, don’t mind immigration. 😉

  56. @Mark Presco

    Actually, the US constitution banned the importation of slaves as of 1807. So no: Southern planters were not guilty of encouraging ‘immigration’ in the run-up to the Civil War.

    • Replies: @Mark Presco
  57. tjm says:
    @Vires

    well said, though you left off your list Jon Stewert….

    in other words, if it is on the media, it is approved by the zionists.

    people need to understand how controlled our “reality” truly is. zionist jews control it all, and that means, if the meme is the “media is at war with trump”, it is because that is what they want you to believe, of course nothing could be further from the truth, any such war is a canard, meant to drive the right to support zionist trump.

  58. Sam J. says:
    @Mark Presco

    “…I believe Lincoln was assassinated by southern sympathizers because had a plan to remove blacks from this country…”

    That’s the dumbest thing I’ve ever heard. Booth was a Jew. The Jews killed Lincoln.

    As for the author’s essay. It’s too late to say,”oops we shouldn’t have imported so many aliens”. They’re already here and violence will ensue eventually. Remember that they are responsible for them being here and act accordingly if Whites are violently attacked.

  59. gustafus says:

    Jews know they can dominate blacks, hispanics, and, sometimes, Muslims. White Christians are their economic enemy. So long as white Christians are outnumbered and at war with the invading hordes… the Jew, Bezos, Zuckerberg, all the hidieous monsters at the top… enjoy primacy.

    So now White America embraces the Jew as an ally against Islam….. with the invasion orchestrated by Jews. ALWAYS ALWAYS ALWAYS … Jews are the enemy of mankind.

    And the Germans? I think they are more savvy than we give them credit for. They have been chastised, beaten, and scorned for the Nazi efforts against this enemy….. but NOW, Germany is occupying the moral high ground – SAVING Muslims … making a deal with the enemy of Jews.

    Jews will leave Germany…. Germans will take back their banks and economy… and manage an enemy within that they can control…… maybe.

    I think Merkel is the new Fuhrer. She knows the true enemy of Germany…. and Muslims are pikers

  60. Mark Presco says: • Website
    @Seamus Padraig

    That law was every bit as effective at stopping slave trafficking as the drug laws are at stopping drug trafficking.

    I used the word infest, not import. The real reason for the reduction of the Atlantic route was that slave holders had an even more profitable business of breeding their own. Jimmy The Greek got fired for asserting that they were bred for specific physical traits.

  61. Sam Shama says:
    @SolontoCroesus

    Who is Reza Jorjani? A new age mullah?

  62. @Anonym

    Honest yes, courageous no. Instead of preaching to the choir here (and, where he’s been more active, the Occidental Quarterly) he needs to take his message to the Jewish community. Show up at your shul’s functions and try to (gently) educate people. Publish (or try) in the Jewish press.

    • Replies: @Anonym
  63. Anonym says:
    @International Jew

    Honest yes, courageous no. Instead of preaching to the choir here (and, where he’s been more active, the Occidental Quarterly) he needs to take his message to the Jewish community. Show up at your shul’s functions and try to (gently) educate people. Publish (or try) in the Jewish press.

    Your point is valid, but the point I was making is that it likely was a gutwrenching decision as to acknowledge KMac and Hart Celler in the very frank, no punches pulled way he did. I think it’s highly likely that he second guessed himself for hours during the writing of the piece, and probably felt intermittent pangs of regret after publishing. I could be wrong. But if it’s so easy, why is it not seen more? I think it took a lot of courage to hit the post button on that one, even in this forum because once on the internet, it’s there forever.

    So from that perspective, it’s a good first step and shows leadership.

  64. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:
    @john cronk

    Keith says:

    Good post. However, in the future please do not repeat Zionist/ Jewish propaganda.

    The Jews did not carve a country out of a desert. Their ethnic cleansing for living space
    was and is strategic. They have stolen the most fertile land, along with the majority of the areas with the most water resources. In addition, Jews didn’t ethnic cleanse the Palestinians all by themselves. The knife they used to carve up the Palestinian’s homeland was payed for with American tax dollars and the Zionist banking cartel, the Rothschild dynasty.

    This is why the main boulevard in Tel Aviv is named: The Rothschild boulevard.

    The only land left will be a desert. The Palestinians will have to do with a desert country, dependent on their criminal Zionists neighbors.

    No people in history ever received more economic, political and military assistance than the Jews in their criminal formation of a illegal country.

    • Agree: anarchyst
  65. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    Keith says:

    Why is it always: Is it good for the Jews?

    While the white Europeans are complaining about being overrun by immigrants with uncompatible cultures, the Jews are already forming alliances with Chinese Americans so they can hold on to their power. Their alliance with the American African community has run its course and the elite Jews have, or will run, from the Democratic Party. Why, the multicultural Democratic Party is not marching in lock step with the democratic Jews on support for Israel. For this reason the elite Jews now support the Republicans.

    My point is, the Jews already have a plan to deal with the immigration problem, while European whites are just angry and don’t know what to do.

    So let’s learn from the Jews: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L42TxsKKPi8

    What is their plan and how can we stop it? I need everyone’s ideas.

  66. @jacques sheete

    They did remain as the treasure of the nations they were created in…..

    ….until jewish elites wanted them back so they started an elaborate chain of events that destabilized vast regions of the world, allowing them to take what they “helped create”. Its all very simple. Wish there was a pamphlet available. ..

  67. @Anonym

    I think it took a lot of courage to hit the post button on that one

    Well, “Marcus Alethia” is not his real name. So it took no more courage tgan I exercise when I post comments in Jewish online press sites.

  68. @wayfarer

    The US has such lax labor laws (& enforcement) & “generous” immigration law because Elites want the specific benefit of paying (illegal) immigrants the lowest wage possible, & the general benefit of an over-supply of labor keeping everyone’s wages suppressed.
    That is the essence of US immigration.

  69. geokat62 says:
    @SolontoCroesus

    IF Jason Reza Jorjani’s arguments hold weight, that Iranian (Aryan) culture is the foundation of Western culture…

    Has Jorjani written a sequel to Martin Bernal’s Black Athena that I’m unaware of?

  70. Anonymous [AKA "Juhn"] says:

    Jews support the Muslim invasion as they- both- are anti-Christian and they view Christians as their natural enemy…The Muslims will do the dirty work for the Jews…Simple, and scary it is being allowed.

  71. drifter says:
    @Ilyana_Rozumova

    The Zionists are psychopathic paracites who usually end up driving the agenda of the western world. It’s unbelievable that so many let so few ruin their world. Although this is all just “rearranging the deck chairs on the Titantic”….Fukushima, along with a long history of atomic polution, has insured Mans passing from this realm.

  72. Zenarchy says:
    @Ace

    Well, genetics has proven that Greeks have the most Middle-Eastern ancestry of all Europeans. So while you’re not entirely wrong, the root of European greatness has sprung from the least white among whites.

    Of course, that was largely due to geography – being close to many earlier centers of greatness.

  73. Anonymous [AKA "divendeeper"] says:

    anamaria said

    “The Zionists has built their castle on the injustice and other peoples’ blood, a shaky ground for a 20th century project.”

    Shaky ground indeed.

    Castle construction on the injustice and other peoples’ blood began in earnest in the Empire of Babylon.

    An obedient servant named Daniel followed directions. He was told to seal the words and the book. Dan 12:4

    This left the Hebrew peoples rudderless adrift without the aid of anything to have helped them steer their way forward.The alphabet which Moses had schlepped down with from Sinai was sealed.

    Babylonian cultural effects began to erode their lives and how they would record all of their perceived inter reactions with God. This over time had an effect on their alphabet as it changed 26 times.

    As it did it would also endure the effects of the Babylonian and ensuing empires. In Greece the first democratic election was conducted. Twelve tribes who were recognized in the land were the only qualified voters. The balance of inhabitants were either slave owners or traders or slaves.

    These same twelve would eventually make their way to the Roman Empire.

    The empire co -opted the early church and produced a diluted version of Christianity which relied upon the leaders to give the followers certain rights. This sealed book
    ( taking into account the one Daniel sealed) worked kind of OK up till another group broke off to form a Protestant movement.

    The Catholic canon was modified and Protestantism became the tool of choice for the Monarchs of Europe to thrive by using either Protestantism or Catholicism or both to form nations. These core nations would later be responsible for their western expansion in to the western hemisphere.

    They would conclude their conquest with the formation of Israel.

    Each nation was created exactly 12,000 days apart from one another.

    This correlation is found in a passage of Revelation 7:4 which leads the reader to believe that only 144,000 people will achieve eternal life. However when placing this list coupled with each of the tribes and the number 12,000 reveals a sealing of these tribes under each of these twelve nations.

    They are pegged to the dates of their respective treaties.

    Each of these nations manifest the original tribal blessings they were given by their father Jacob. Except that they are all manifesting them in their most degenerate state of their respective blessing.

    Take Benjamin- Israel’s blessing.””Benjamin is a ravenous wolf; in the morning he devours the prey, in the evening he divides the plunder.”

    Each of the blessings can be seen as manifesting across the tribes or nations. Just invest an hour or two on world news.

    “Benjamin is a ravenous wolf; in the morning he devours the prey, in the evening he divides the plunder.”

    http://bibletribes.org/

  74. delmas says:

    Sounds like little Irving and Gladys need to slow down on the Mogen David.

  75. @Mark Presco

    If the rich Whites wrecked havoc on the poor ones once before and got away with it, then what makes you think that they won’t get away this time… The object of wrath for the Civil War poor Whites were the then slave and not the real culprits; are you similarly planning to target the ‘third world’ immigrants and not the guilty?

  76. “It is not Jewish supremacy that makes Israelis think a Jewish majority in Israel in the midst of an overwhelmingly Arab Middle East is necessary and reasonable. And it is not white supremacy that makes white Americans wish to preserve a basic, white majority, which implies no ill-treatment or legal second-class status for Americans of color.”

    Let’s have the truth in at least one comment – here it is – the Jews think they are superior and want to live in a Jewish country (and await the mashiach who will lead them to world domination), whites think they are superior and want to live in white countries. Speaking for whites, how in hell could it be otherwise? White Europeans have created the modern world, starting with the Greeks I suppose, but really taking off with the science in the 16th century and the industrial revolution that followed. Modern everything was dreamed up, designed, developed, and built by white nations. We think we’re superior and IMO with good reason.

    • Replies: @SolontoCroesus
  77. @Simple Simon

    We think we’re superior and IMO with good reason.

    . . . but that which makes whites (whatever that is) more superior than Jews is that whites are humble about their superiority.

    • Replies: @anarchyst
  78. Anonymous [AKA "Marcus Alethia"] says:
    @Anonym

    Thanks for your comments. I wrestled with this stuff all a while back so no second-guessing or regrets on this piece. I occasionally write for TOO at Kevin’s invitation and am a fan of his work, which I probably agree with around 80-90%. I think unfortunately his work was stigmatized and most Jews are afraid to read or comment on it. I think that is unfortunate – we should be engaging with him and his ideas and that is what I try to do.

  79. anarchyst says:
    @Wally

    There were 2.8 million Jews in Europe after WW2 was concluded. However, there were 3.8 million Jews who applied for holocaust™ reparations…
    What’s wrong with this picture???

  80. anarchyst says:
    @Jake

    Actually Jews and Moslems are more alike than most people realize. If it comes to a choice of who to support, the Jew will support the Moslem before he will support citizens of his host country.
    Both Judaism and Islam have their respective forms of supremacism written into their texts–something that Christians find abhorrent.
    It would appear that Islam is an Arabacized form of Judaism…the comparisons and similarities are striking.

  81. anarchyst says:
    @SolontoCroesus

    You are correct. It is our misplaced sense of externalized altruism, always looking out for the “downtrodden” while minimizing our own value that is a real problem. When the “downtrodden’ get power, whites will be exterminated. You see, the civil-rights “protections” afforded the “downtrodden” will not benefit whites, as whites are the only group that can be “racist”…

  82. As American Jews, we are essentially guests in the US, a historically White Christian nation where a Jewish minority has thrived, but has in many ways acted against the interest of our hosts

    Agree completely.

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Marcus Alethia Comments via RSS