The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 Spencer J. Quinn Archive
Jewish History, Jewish Religion: A Review
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

Jewish History, Jewish Religion
Israel Shahak
Pluto Press, 1994

For a thorough airing of Jewish dirty laundry, one cannot do much better than Israel Shahak’s Jewish History, Jewish Religion: The Weight of Three Thousand Years (JHJR). First published in 1994, JHJR, represents a humanist critique of classical and modern Judaism which extends to the pervasive anti-gentile attitudes of Jews throughout history. Much of Shahak’s critique leads to his condemnation of Israel’s current treatment of the Palestinians, but he also offers the gentile’s perspective whenever discussing historical conflicts between Jews and gentiles. Most importantly, however, Shahak underscores the blatant hypocrisy, the niggling legalism, and the chauvinistic ethnocentrism behind classical Judaism, as expressed in the Talmud and other post-biblical writings. While he focuses his ire on the fanatical rabbis—mostly in Israel—who still adhere to these antiquated doctrines and exert influence in the Israeli military, modern dissidents can implement Shahak’s historical and Talmudic analysis whenever countering the historical complaints Jews continually levy against gentiles, especially the white ones.

Shahak begins by demonstrating how the Jewish state of Israel exists to serve the interests of Jews first and foremost. Jews are protected and encouraged by the law in ways that non-Jews are not, especially when it comes to residency and commercial discrimination. Shahak recognizes that many of these discriminatory laws go unenforced in Israel, but they remain on the books. And some are enforced, or at least were as of the book’s publication. Shahak offers the example of Jews—but not gentiles—being legally allowed to lease an orchard from a Jew for harvest. He also describes the financial incentives Israel provides for its Jewish citizens to return to Israel after they leave, while not making similar offers to its non-Jewish citizens in similar circumstances. Further, Kibbutzes exclude Arabs and require that all non-Jews convert before joining. Underlying these double standards is what Shahak calls “the ideology of redeemed land.” Israeli land is considered “redeemed” when it belongs or is sold to a Jew. The same land in gentile hands would be considered “unredeemed.” The logical extension of this, as Shahak points out, is the ultimate redemption of all Jewish land. As of the 1990s at least there was debate as to how far outside Israeli’s current borders unredeemed Jewish land actually stretches.

Shahak connects this double standard to the closed society many religiously zealous Jews want Israel to be. Despite having great knowledge of Judaism, Shahak laments this, and wishes Israel be an open society. But achieving this will require some painful decisions on the part of Jewish Israelis. The following passage, I think, sums up his intentions with JHJR:

A Jewish state, whether based on its present Jewish ideology or, if it becomes even more Jewish in character than it is now, on the principles of Jewish Orthodoxy, cannot even contain an open society. There are two choices which face Israeli-Jewish society. It can become a fully closed and warlike ghetto, a Jewish Sparta, supported by the labour of Arab helots, kept in existence by its influence on the US political establishment and by threats to use is nuclear power, or it can try to become an open society. The second choice is dependent on a honest examination of its Jewish past, on the admission that Jewish chauvinism and exclusivism exist, and on a honest examination of the attitudes of Judaism towards non-Jews.

And if there are any positive attitudes towards non-Jews in Judaism, Shahak studiously does not mention them.

One of Shahak’s main contentions regarding classical Judaism is its totalitarian nature. He mentions how eighteenth-century Jews burned books, persecuted dissidents, banned non-Jewish education, and were absorbed in mysticism. Tolerance was not part of the equation, and Shahak quite cheekily points out how at times even unfriendly gentile societies were kinder to the Jews than the Jews were to themselves. He states bluntly that when Jews were liberated or emancipated throughout the nineteenth century, they were in many case freed from “the tyranny of their own religion” rather than from any gentile oppression. He offers as an example the Metternich regime in Austria in the 1840s, which actually enforced laws protecting Jews from being murdered. Shahak makes a similar point regarding Tsar Nicholas I:

Nicholas I of Russia was a notorious anti-Semite and issued many laws against the Jews of his state. But he also strengthened the forces of ‘law and order’ in Russia—not only the secret police but also the regular police and the gendarmerie—with the consequence that it became difficult to murder Jews on the order of their rabbis, whereas in pre-1795 Poland it had been quite easy.

Shahak characterizes pre-emancipated Jewish societies as “sunk in the most abject superstition, fanaticism and ignorance” and describes how in the first Hebrew work on geography (published in 1803), the authors complained about how a great many rabbis were still denying the existence of America. He even cracks a joke about how these classical Jewish societies prohibited the study of secular material—except while on the privy:

One can imagine that those few Jews of that time who – no doubt tempted by Satan—developed an interest in the history of the French kings were constantly complaining to their neighbours about the constipation they were suffering from.

Shahak stresses how official Jewish histories of this period which ignore or deny any of this “bear the unmistakable marks of their origin: deception, apologetics or hostile polemics, indifference or even active hostility to the pursuit of truth.” As evidence of this duplicity, Shahak describes how before emancipation, rabbis continually subverted Christian censorship whenever Christians became aware of virulently anti-gentile passages in the Talmud and other writings. For example, terms such as “non-Jew” or “gentile” would be replaced with seemingly less offensive terms such as “idolator” or “Samaritan” which then served as euphemisms for the goyim. Shahak calls these efforts “a calculated lie” since once the rabbis felt secure enough in Israel centuries later, the original anti-gentile passages reappeared in modern editions of their holy books.

And as for anti-gentile language, there is a lot of it, and not just in the Talmud. The Hebrew word shaqetz refers both to unclean animals and to gentile children. In a work known as The Book of Knowledge, Jews are instructed to exterminate gentiles with their own hands (a passage wholly expunged from the book’s English translations). In the Hasidic text known as Hatanya, gentiles are considered Satanic creatures. The Halakhah, which outlines the legal system of classical Judaism and springs from the Babylonian Talmud, openly approves of war crimes (i.e., the killing of ostensibly good gentile civilians during war). In Maimonides’ Guide to the Perplexed, Blacks and some other nomadic races are likened to “mute animals” and “are not on the level of human beings.” (In the 1925 American translation, editors obfuscated this embarrassing detail by replacing the Hebrew word Kushim, meaning Blacks, with the nonsensical “Kushites”). There is a morning prayer in which Jews thank God for not making them gentiles. In another prayer, the worshipper declares, “and may the apostates have no hope, and all the Christians perish instantly.” Devout Jews are enjoined to utter a curse whenever passing a gentile cemetery or upon seeing a large gentile population. The fourteenth-century work called The Book of Education reinterprets seemingly universalist verbiage from the Bible into chauvinistic, pro-Jewish exhortations. For example, according to The Book of Knowledge, the verse “Thou shalt love thy fellow as thyself,” really means “Thou shalt love thy fellow Jew as thyself.” Finally, according to the Talmudic Encyclopedia, the intricacy of the law regarding adultery with gentile women reveals that, to devout Jews, all gentile women, even the ones who convert to Judaism, are presumed to be whores.

Keep in mind that while devout Jews were praying for the death of gentiles and while Jewish leaders were fully aware of the hidebound aspects of their own religion, they pressured the Catholic Church during the mid-20th century to remove the line about God forgiving Jews in one its Good Friday prayers; because, of course, to say such a thing would be anti-Semitic.

Perhaps the most astonishing aspect of JHJR is how petty and legalistic Shahak reveals Judaism to be. It seems that Judaism, as interpreted and re-interpreted over the centuries in the Talmud and other texts—down to the most trivial details—has provided the evolutionary bottleneck through which the Jews have become the world’s heavyweight champions of lawyers. In some cases, it’s as if God laid down the law in the Torah, and it’s up to His chosen people to find ingenious loopholes around these very laws—as if the All-Powerful Creator of the Universe were too obtuse to notice.

On the proscription against milking cows on the Sabbath, Shahak writes—hilariously—that according to Zionist rabbis:

the forbidden milking becomes permitted provided the milk is not white but dyed blue. This blue Saturday milk is then used exclusively for making cheese, and the dye is washed off into the whey. Non-Zionist rabbis have devised a much subtler scheme (which I personally witnessed operating in a religious kibbutz in 1952). They discovered an old provision which allows the udders of a cow to be emptied on the Sabbath, purely for relieving the suffering caused to the animal by bloated udders, and on the strict condition that the milk runs to waste on the ground. Now, this is what is actually done: on Saturday morning, a pious kibbutznik goes to the cowshed and places pails under the cows. (There is no ban on such work in the whole of the Talmudic literature.) He then goes to the synagogue to pray. Then comes his colleague, whose ‘honest intention’ is to relieve the animal’s pain and let their milk run to the floor. But if, by chance, a pail happens to be standing there, is he under any obligation to remove it? Of course not. He simply ‘ignores’ the pails, fulfills his mission of mercy and goes to the synagogue. Finally a third pious colleague goes into the cowshed and discovers, to his great surprise, the pails full of milk. So he puts them in cold storage and follows his comrades to the synagogue. Now all is well, and there is no need to waste money on blue dye.

This is funny. But when rules are laid down and then interpreted to not only benefit Jews but also to necessarily harm gentiles, it’s not funny. In Chapter Five, “The Laws Against Non-Jews,” Israel Shahak wrote it all down.

According to Maimonides’ Mishneh Torah, the Talmudic Encyclopedia, and R. Yo’el Sirkis’ Bayit Hadash, Jew-on-Jew murder is a capital sin, but Jew-on-gentile murder is not, and is therefore not punishable by any Jewish court. R. David Halevi declares in his seventeenth-century text Turey Zahav which comments on the Shulhan ‘Arukh that a Jew must not directly harm a gentile, but he allows for indirect harm of gentiles. Maimonides himself proscribes Jewish doctors treating gentiles. Basically, a gentile life must not be saved. For example, a Jew would not be allowed to shove a gentile down a crevice, but if the gentile is already in the crevice, the Jew is under no obligation to pull him out. Indeed, if there is a ladder which could facilitate the gentile’s rescue, the Jew may also remove the ladder.

Unless, of course, such indirect harm would then bring hostility upon the Jews as a whole. Then, and only then, would a Jew not be permitted to indirectly harm a gentile. This, I call “the hostility exception,” and Shahak brings it up a lot. Jews respect power, and this power more than any universal set of values informs their jurisprudence. When gentiles (or heretic Jews) are weak, they are afforded no mercy in the law. However, when gentiles are strong, then Jews are required to do the very minimum to not increase their hostility. One crass and recurring example of this was how Jewish doctors would be encouraged to treat wealthy gentiles, including kings, nobles, lords, and the like. But poor gentiles, never. Obviously, such self-serving codification defies any absolute sense of Right and Wrong—moral particularlism at its most egregious, and is one of the aspects of classical Judaism that Shahak finds so offensive.

This next one might be the worst of them all. According to the virulently anti-gentilic Maimonides in his “Prohibitions on Sexual Intercourse” (emphasis mine):

If a Jew has coitus with a Gentile woman, whether she be a child of three or an adult, whether married or unmarried, and even if she is a minor aged only nine years and one day—because he had willful coitus with her, she must be killed, as is the case with a beast, because through her a Jew got in trouble.

Get that? According to one of greatest Jewish scholars of all time, a Jew has license to murder, rape, and molest children as long as the victim is a gentile. And of course, the sanctity of gentile marriages amounts to nothing.

Here are a few more anti-gentilic laws, all of which adhere to the “hostility exception” described above:

  1. Gentiles are forbidden to bear testimony in rabbinical courts, since all gentiles are presumed liars.
  2. Jews must not offer gifts to gentiles.
  3. Jews must exact interest when lending money to gentiles.
  4. Jews must never return items lost by a gentile.
  5. Jews shall not deceive other Jews in business, but may practice “indirect deception” when doing business with a gentile.
  6. Jews shall not steal without violence from anyone, gentiles included. However, there are certain circumstances under which they may steal with violence from gentiles under their control.
  7. Jews are forbidden to sell unmovable property (i.e., structure and land) to gentiles in Israel.

Towards the end of JHJR, Shahak bluntly states something that most counter-Semites know as fact:

It must be emphasized that the explanations quoted above do represent correctly the teaching of the Halakhah. The rabbis and, even worse, the apologetic ‘scholars of Judaism’ know this very well and for this reason they do not try to argue against such views inside the Jewish community; and of course they never mention them outside it. Instead, they vilify any Jew who raises these matters within earshot of Gentiles, and they issue deceitful denials in which the art of equivocation reaches its summit.

Shahak states further that Judaism is imbued with both hatred and ignorance of Christianity, and that this is largely independent of any Christian persecution of the Jews. Thus, he often takes the gentile perspective when reviewing Jewish history in JHJR. He makes it clear that even the poorest Jews were better off than serfs. He also points out that Jews, as agents of kings or nobility, often exploited the peasantry, especially in Poland. He doesn’t deny that European peasants triggered anti-Jewish uprisings throughout history, but he also lists historical peasant uprisings that had nothing to do with Jews. Clearly then, what Jews call “anti-Semitism” is not inherent to European peasants. Shahak says the quiet part out loud when concluding that Jewish influence declines when gentile nations assume a more nationalistic (read: ethno-nationalistic) attitude and have a greater political connection between the rulers and the people—what it now termed populism in American political culture. There is a long history going back at least to the 1930s of Jewish anti-populist writing (Chapter 5 of The Culture of Critique)—writing that eventually penetrated American academic and media culture with the rise of Jewish power.

Most damningly, Shahak states:

Before the advent of the modern state the position of the Jews was socially most important, and their internal autonomy greatest, under a regime which was completely retarded to the point of utter degeneracy.

In other words, Jews readily made alliances with oppressive, degenerate non-Jewish elites and participated with these elites in exploiting the non-Jewish population.

Certainly, viewing the Jewish Question through the lens Israel Shahak provides us in JHJR makes things much clearer. He provides cogent reasons why gentiles oppressed Jews in the past or evicted them from their nations. Still, we should remember that Shahak was no fellow traveler of the Dissident Right. Like any good liberal humanist, he opposed all race-based policies, laws, and nations. He opposed ethno-nationalism in toto and often chided Jews (for example, Rabbi Schneurssohn of New York city) for having anti-Black attitudes—the same anti-Black attitudes that many race-realist White dissidents have today. White people founding pro-White nations would have been just as odious to him as the Zionists who had founded Israel. Most questionably, Shahak on multiple occasions in JHJR expresses a high regard for the ideas behind the French Revolution without mentioning any of its concurrent chaos and atrocities. This should give a clear indication of where he stands as a pollical thinker.

Most importantly, we should keep in mind that Jewish History, Jewish Religion does not condemn modern Jews for the overt racism of their classical religion (excluding those instances when classical Judaism informs their treatment of the Palestinians). Nor should it—since no people is without historical sin. However, the best take from this important and fascinating book is the underscoring of the present sin being committed by most Jews today; that is, blaming gentiles, especially the white ones, for bad things in their past, while astutely ignoring similar bad things in the Jewish past.

A critical mass of Jews who stop doing this will do much to lift the burden of three thousand years.

(Republished from The Occidental Observer by permission of author or representative)
 
Hide 162 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. Cuckeroo Pompeo

    • Replies: @El Dato
    , @annamaria
    , @anonymous
  2. Ethno-nationalism will not solve the Jewish question.
    Socialism and state atheism will.
    Any other course of action will permit the existence of large private wealth and that of course will attract the Jews, furthermore Abrahamic religions in order to exist must tolerate Judaism, but not necessarily Judaism tolerate nor respect its religious sects(Christianity and Islam).
    It may be possible to not be a socialist state that is hostile to Jews, but the elites and people would have to be anti-abrahamic with no respect for the texts or god of the Jews.

    Israel Shahak is a great person for what he has written as is Gilad Atzmon, Shahak’s book with Norton Mezvinsky Jewish Fundamentalism in Israel is also good.

    • Replies: @Franz
    , @Chris Moore
  3. Wyatt says:

    A pack of dirty sand people wormed their way into Europe, got a hold of actual good genes, but are inbred as fuck and now their inbreeding-induced paranoia and schizophrenia are the guideposts of western foreign policy because they feel threatened by anyone they don’t outright control.

    I don’t think I missed much.

    • LOL: Realist
    • Replies: @Levtraro
  4. Polistra says:

    In one short book, Israel Shahak taught me more useful information about the Ruling Tribe than I ever learned in a lifetime of being saturated by their endless and ubiquitous mass-media propaganda. Not to mention that what Israel Shahak shared is actually accurate.

    • Agree: Fr. John
  5. On the proscription against milking cows on the Sabbath, Shahak writes—hilariously—that according to Zionist rabbis

    It not only explains why Jews became good at law but at comedy.

    Some of this stuff is totally hilarious.

    • Replies: @milosevic
    , @simple mind
  6. https://mediateca.directory/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Shahak-Jewish-History-Jewish-Religion-2.pdf

    Sometime in the late 1950s, that world-class gossip and occasional historian, John F. Kennedy, told me how, in 1948, Harry S. Truman had been pretty much abandoned by everyone when he came to run for president. Then an American Zionist brought him two million dollars in cash, in a suitcase, aboard his whistle-stop campaign train. ‘That’s why our recognition of Israel was rushed through so fast.’ As neither Jack nor I was an antisemite (unlike his father and my grandfather) we took this to be just another funny story about Truman and the serene corruption of American politics.

    From the first edition Gore Vidal preface.

    • Agree: Jim Christian
    • Thanks: GomezAdddams, annamaria
  7. Franz says:
    @anyone with a brain

    Ethno-nationalism will not solve the Jewish question.

    It’s the only thing that ever has.

    There is no great feat to mix ethno-nationalism with socialism. It’s been done.

    But I agree with you that prying the European soul from an Asiatic volcano god would do more than any political system. Likely it’s the only way any European political system can work.

    • Agree: Ian Smith
  8. Altai says:

    Shahak connects this double standard to the closed society many religiously zealous Jews want Israel to be. Despite having great knowledge of Judaism, Shahak laments this, and wishes Israel be an open society. But achieving this will require some painful decisions on the part of Jewish Israelis.

    One can see the conflicting context of diaspora Jew (Shahak being born in Poland) who internalises an ‘open society’ as something to instinctually press for and encountering a different context in the ethnostate. He uses absurd absolutist visions to depict this ‘fortress Israel’ despite achieving this objective requiring a few simple laws (It would not come to require an authoritarian regime that might threaten Israeli Jews anymore than it would harm native gentiles in their societies but he pretends otherwise because he knows this) just like he was inclined to use histrionic language against the host population in Poland and greater Christendom.

    Shahak wants Israel to remain a Jewish state but having grown up internalising as pure morality the idea of an ‘open society’ among his former host nation, it’d salve his moral and political aesthetics if it could be achieved with an open society. IE, if other demographics could theoretically come and go as they please but don’t.

    A very similar situation is seen in the older Jewish head of the ACLU, Ira Glasser bemoaning the way the new ACLU is so severely politically biased and comfortable in banning books and blocking speech or directly endorsing specific politicians.

    https://www.tabletmag.com/sections/news/articles/the-disintegration-of-the-aclu-james-kirchick

    Glasser and his friends rarely encountered anybody who wasn’t Jewish, much less Black, within the 12-block neighborhood of East Flatbush that comprised the world of their childhood (New York City, he says in the film, was less the fabled “melting pot” of popular American sentiment than “a collection of insular segregated tribes”).

    No American minority had reaped more from its faith in the country’s professed commitment to pluralism and tolerance than the Jews, a gift they repaid many times over by supporting the institutions—the universities, the Democratic Party, the ACLU—which upheld them. In the same way Lenny Bruce classified Ray Charles and fruit salad as Jewish (while claiming that “Evaporated milk is goyish even if the Jews invented it”), so the ACLU was seen as scrappy, authentic, and emblematic of an underdog quality. As Bruce might have put it: the ACLU, Jewish; the McCarthyite American Jewish League Against Communism, goyish.

    Not that they ever pulled punches. Debating the constitutionality of flag burning on Firing Line, Buckley told Glasser something to the effect that the “average American” has a visceral reaction to the desecration of the Stars and Stripes

    Though he fully agrees with the politics and views of the new ACLU he still feels like what it is doing is wrong despite the current political orthodoxy being ascendant being what he was working towards all those decades previously. He even admits this, that his motivation was ethnic. Back then speech they liked benefited from unrestricted freedom of speech. (And if their point was mad all the clearer by defending a KKK march so be it, they knew the KKK wasn’t making a comeback) Today speech they don’t like is the kind which benefits from unrestricted freedom of speech and the who/whom underneath shows it’s true nature as they become advocates for speech and knowledge restriction.

    But to Glasser we see he has internalised the moral superiority of ‘freedom of speech’ and so is incapable of truly letting it go or understanding this new context or his true motivations. He was never a supporting of freedom of speech anymore than Shahak was of an ‘open society’.

    Or perhaps more interestingly, both Glasser and Shahak fear that this period of Jewish ascendancy is not on solid ground, the history of the Jews was never one of permanent ascendancy anywhere. Perhaps they fear pulling the sinews back too far, lest the arrow be pointed in their face next time. Shahak probably fears Israel’s floating of all Western morality, a morality which treats racism as the greatest sin chiefly authored by diaspora Jews, will make Israel’s fall from untouchable status that much harder when it comes. Better to have a country with lots of Jews among others (Or the potential for that to end up happening) than perhaps to lose it all. See also Bari Weiss giving up a very nice job at the NYT to protest wokeness despite being a liberal lesbian Jew but a turbo Zionist liberal lesbian Jew. This context, of course, was not reported, making the whole incident a very subtle insider signal.

  9. Dumbo says:

    Socialism and state atheism will.

    LOL. Yeah, just like they did in the Soviet Union, right?

    furthermore Abrahamic religions in order to exist must tolerate Judaism,

    The only reason why Jews were excluded in ghettos (and in many cases expelled) from European countries from centuries was because of traditional Christianity (Catholic) being very wary of them. They returned with a vengeance with increased secularism.

    Most Jews are atheists, by the way. Despite their weird traditional religion that only the Haredim follow.

    • Replies: @anyone with a brain
  10. Anon[233] • Disclaimer says:

    Not that I am siding with the Jews but doesn’t everyone do this to some extent? The Indian(of india) ethnnocentrism shown by every state and culture there makes the Jews look like the greatest individualist and to some extent so do the Chinese of China. The reason the Jews act this way is because they were always discriminated and just adopted this method far earlier in time. Everyone will act this way with the history they’ve had combined with the progression of time and society.

    • LOL: Trinity
  11. milosevic says:

    Israel Shahak — Jewish History, Jewish Religion: The Weight of Three Thousand Years

    https://archive.org/details/11ShahakJewishHistoryJewishReligion/

  12. With my scanty knowledge of Jewish history, I am in no position to challenge Quinn’s take on Shahak’s JHJR. The piece is so replete with scriptural quotes, of which I have been equally ignorant. Still, the information provided is at once instructive and revealing, on the evolution of Jewish scriptures and their massaging through the ages to sanitize them of their evil content. Scriptures are being doctored, not to present a more humane Jewishness but to ameliorate the intrinsic evil that has informed the devout followers of Judaism over millennia and still does – behind the scenes.

    The extreme Jewish venom that Quinn shows must make the Muslim Koran seem like a children’s story book. One is left wondering about the evil of the American and European Christian goyim with the reins of power to be so easily taken in by the layers of lies fed them over a century or so (or more?). It simply beggars belief.

  13. JessicaR says:

    Of course, Shahak is right that such anti-Gentile provisions exist in Judaism. But as Baruch Kimmerling pointed out in his review of Shahak’s book, the proviso in Jewish law that one can be kind to non-Jews to avoid “hurt feelings” in fact offered a legal loophole to Jews who were predisposed to treat non-Jews well.

    There are also modern groups of observant Jews like “Rabbis for Human Rights” that completely reject the kind of discrimination discussed in Shahak’s book.

    The take-home message: Judaism is a large system with varying views, even among the Orthodox. While the existence of what the author describes should not be denied, one should also recognize the many interpretations of Judaism–even within Orthodoxy–that do not adhere to these racist formulations.

    • Replies: @annamaria
  14. According to one of the most outstanding Jewish scholars, a Jew has a license to murder, rape, and molest children as long as the victim is a gentile, writes Spencer J. Quincy, reviewing Israel Shahak’s book “Jewish History, Jewish Religion. The Weight of Three Thousand Years.” Could that explain Jeffrey Epstein’s perversities mistreating under-aged girls and his mistress Ghislaine Maxwell’s helping hand in it because of their Jewishness? All jokes aside!

    Israel Shahak’s writings are more important than the iniquities of these two Jewish sex offenders. “Open Secrets” explains Israel’s obsession with Iran, which challenges the Zionist’s quest for hegemony from Morocco to Iran. https://between-the-lines-ludwig-watzal.blogspot.com/2010/05/open-secrets-israel-shahak-revisited.html “Jewish Fundamentalism in Israel,” co-authored by Nerton Mezvinsky, shows how orthodox greed creeps into all walks of Israel society. http://www.watzal.com/Jewish_Fundamentalism_in_Israel.pdf

    Israel Shahak was an outstanding scholar and an incorruptible personality.

    Another renowned author is Professor Yakov M. Rabkin, who brought up a painful subject in his groundbreaking book “What is Modern Israel?” UNZ review should review also Shahak’s other books.

    Below are more links to promote a better understanding of Shahak’s thinking.

    https://between-the-lines-ludwig-watzal.blogspot.com/2010/07/in-memoriam-israel-shahak.html
    http://www.watzal.com/Gedanken_ueber_Israel.pdf
    https://taz.de/!1477487/
    http://www.watzal.com/Israel_Entzionisierung.pdf
    https://between-the-lines-ludwig-watzal.blogspot.com/2010/08/israels-zukunft-entzionisierung-und-die.html

    • Thanks: RedpilledAF
  15. El Dato says:
    @Priss Factor

    Pompeo should be aerodropped into an arena of starved ISIS fanatics.

  16. El Dato says:

    Ouch time:

    Aussie man banned from leaving Israel until year 9999

    An Australian father says he’s forbidden from leaving Israel for any reason until December 31, 9999 unless he pays his Israeli ex-wife \$2.4 million in future child support under a local divorce law.

    Huppert told News.com.au that he’s been effectively “locked” in Israel since 2013, a year after he arrived in the Jewish state to reconnect with the two children he had with his former wife – an Israeli citizen. The kids were three months and five years old at the time.

    Shortly after Huppert moved to Israel, the woman brought a case against him at a local religious court, which oversees issues such as marriage, divorce, child custody and child support payments. Ruling on the basis of Israeli divorce law, the court banned the Australian from leaving the country until he pays out a “future debt” in alimony payments for the entire duration of his two kids’ childhood.

    Under the so-called “stay-of-exit order,” the man was ordered to pay 5,000 Israeli shekels (around \$1,600) per month in child support for each of his children until they turn 18.

    • LOL: Mike Tre
  17. Rabi Manis Friedman has turned my (FAKE/BIZARRE) opinion about Hebrew and Judaism 180 degrees, making it crystal CLEAR to ME(Human), disconnect of Zionism from Judaism.
    https://www.chabad.org/library/article_cdo/aid/392729/jewish/About-Rabbi-Friedman.htm
    His videos(YT) are mind openers.

  18. EuroNat says:
    @Anon

    Not that I am siding with the Jews but doesn’t everyone do this to some extent?

    This is pure sophistry, yes you are shilling for Judea clearly. Good shilling, when the reason of antisemitism is clearly exposed (a mostly legitimate host reaction to a hostile culture based on Judaism, a chauvinistic antigentile and anti Christian religion) and the sources cannot be dismissed as antisemitic the spin of the PR experts and useful idiots is “but everyone does it to some extent!”

    A bunch of American whites also assault, rob, kill and rape to some extent, yet blacks do it disproportionately.

    Could this be the reason why people here complain often about blacks? understand now how moronic your sorry excuse of an apology is?

    Classic “nothing to see here” defense. It is all relative, 2 Jews 3 opinions, there are bad apples in every bunch yada yada yada.

    Everyone does it but few complain against the Hindu and Chinese stranglehold on the USG.

  19. @Dumbo

    LOL. Yeah, just like they did in the Soviet Union, right?

    Yes, the USSR had quotas on Jews in academia, and there was a large Jewish dissident movement trying to flee to Israel due to anti-semitism. After the fall of the USSR the Jewish oligarchs/vultures came in and dispossessed the people, Putin is way more friendly to Israel and Jewish power than any USSR leader. Compare Ukrainian SSR with Ukraine of today that has a Jewish media personality as president and a Jewish oligarch patron.

    Socialism and state atheism is the only solution.

    The only reason why Jews were excluded in ghettos (and in many cases expelled) from European countries from centuries was because of traditional Christianity (Catholic) being very wary of them.

    Lies, had you read Shahak’s book you would know Jews were self-ghettoizing people, with accounts of ancient Romans complaining how Jews wouldn’t even eat with non-Jews.

    By choosing to adopt semitic religion, you reject the true European(what Gilad Atzmon calls ‘Athenian’) way of critical thought and science. Jews believe what they believe because their religious leaders tells them to. Reject semitic ways of thought and believe what you believe because of first hand experience and reason.

    No true European minded man can believe in semitic religions.

    • Replies: @RockaBoatus
  20. HT says:

    Because of their intelligence, they are clearly the most deadly form of parasite to a society. They have literally sucked the blood and the culture out of America and replaced it with the sewage they profit from.

  21. @Anon

    but doesn’t everyone do this to some extent?

    No, they are noble high minded people out there. And nepotism and such is terrible. It is even worse when ethnocentrist practice ethnocentrism while exhorting everyone else not to, and chastising people who aren’t.

    A noble high-minded (but plagued with guilt and semitic religious nonsense that promotes guilt on the innocent, such as original sin, you don’t have to be a Christian believer to still have the Christian guilt complex in which the victims are pure saints while everyone is guilty of ‘original sin’) people are being taken advantage by ethnocentric chauvinist.

    The atheist Soviets(and pre-1920’s American elites) had no qualms about putting quotas on Jewish admissions to elite universities and degree programs, and especially sensitive state secrets related positions. Some may find that abhorrent, but being denied those jobs and opportunities is not a violation of human rights, those Jews could find work in other fields, it is a much better alternative than doing nothing and then Jewish power developing to such a point that there will be backlash leading to concentration camps.

    here is an interesting anecdote on why Jews were kept from diplomatic positions in the USSR

    [MORE]

    Writing in the Jewish Sentinel (Sept. 28, 1978), Goldmann recounts an interesting interview with Soviet Foreign Minister Andrei Gromyko. “Before the war,” Goldmann asserts,

    most Russian diplomats were Jews. A list of these representatives of the USSR is published every year. Recently it has only contained two or three Jewish names. I took the list to Gromyko and asked why his diplomatic machinery was Judenrein.

    Gromyko replied:

    That has nothing to do with anti-Semitism. With a few exceptions you won’t find any Ukrainians there either. Frankly, we are a closed society, not very democratic in the Western sense of the word. If we send a Jewish second secretary to the Russian embassy in Rio de Janeiro, for example, in his first week he’ll discover that he has a cousin in São Paulo, a week later that he has an uncle in Curitiba, and so on. We don’t like that; we don’t want our diplomats to have personal international relations. Well, the Jewish people is international. I am not saying that Jews are disloyal, but they have too many friends, relations and acquaintances for our liking. We take the same line with the Ukrainians, who have communities abroad.

    Source: Instauration magazine, December 1978 https://nationalvanguard.org/2016/05/gromyko-on-jewish-diplomats/

    • Thanks: Sarah
  22. @El Dato

    Wrt to dropping Pompeo into an area of starved ISIS fanatics, it should have been done before he lost all that weight.

    Dude had begun to look like he was trying to beat Chris Christie in The US’s Fattest Republican Contest.

  23. I read this book a while back and found it very interesting. I like it’s literary and philosophical explication. For example at one point Shahak asks, how is it that Judaism is so racist when the Old Testament is so humanistic in its message? He answers rhetorically that rabbinical Judaism is not in fact based on the Old Testament but rather the Talmud, which was written during the Greek occupation and is influenced by Plato’s Republic which idealizes Sparta as the perfect state, with all other groups as helots serving the better of Sparta. Shahak also quotes Asimov and discusses literary.

  24. Jon Chance says: • Website

    What’s the difference between Judaism and any other mental illness?

    Under the worst circumstances, perhaps even the best men and women behave like Jews.

    The most practical and humane solution to Judaism is probably to neuter everyone who consistently behaves like a Jew and deport them to Birobidzhan.

    If someone establishes a 501(c)3 nonprofit organization called United Against Judaism, will the IRS respect its tax-exempt status?

    • Replies: @Dave Bowman
    , @simple mind
  25. Shahak is generally correct, but he exposes Jewish shadow, in Jungian parlance- not the entire edifice of Judaism.

    My chief objection to Judaist religious culture is that is is, basically- boring. This is a religion without afterlife, I mean normative Judaism, not various heretics. And this is boring & dull.

    For anyone who wants a deeper analysis of historical Judaism & its antagonistic nature, I’d recommend Laqueur and Lindemann.

    https://cloudflare-ipfs.com/ipfs/bafykbzacecd42tp2k6odmlxpc6q7xdgumdjxlxs5qd3la6im52o35xmnepd5y?filename=Walter%20Laqueur%20-%20The%20Changing%20Face%20of%20Anti-Semitism_%20From%20Ancient%20Times%20to%20the%20Present%20Day-Oxford%20University%20Press%20%282008%29.pdf

    • Replies: @Jon Chance
    , @Dave Bowman
  26. annamaria says:
    @Priss Factor

    Treason. They are gleefully committing treason for getting personal comforts.

  27. Iva says:

    The problem with Jews is that they are much more anti-gentile , and this is normal and justified to them , then gentile are anti-semites. However, they constantly screaming about antisemitism.

    • Disagree: Trinity
  28. annamaria says:
    @Anon

    “they were always discriminated…”
    — Is this why “they” have comprised a law demanding to kill a raped child?

    What other religions are so viciously subhuman in their relations to the host nations? How many nations had it enough – 109? http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/expelled.htm
    https://enigmachannel.wordpress.com/2015/06/10/the-worlds-most-evil-woman/

    The problem was, and is, that “they” have been always barbaric. The whole Jewish civilization is condensed into the codex of hate and arrogance. This is an internal problem. Don’t even try to put the blame on others, whether the people in the Middle East, Central Asia, Europe, or the US.

    • Replies: @ptarmigan
  29. Jon Chance says: • Website
    @Bardon Kaldian

    Thank you for providing yet more examples of the most extreme and obvious Jewish hatred of Gentiles.

    But Jewish hatred of Gentiles is only one example of the numerous fundamental problems with Judaism.

    Extreme Judaism is less dangerous than moderate Judaism because extremities are easier to identify and isolate.

    When Judaism morphs into “secular” ideologies such as socialism, it becomes far more dangerous than a handful of blatant religious fanatics residing in ghettos.

    Why do the academic resources you’re recommending confuse the issues with misleading commentary about “Judeo-Christian” ethics, false assumptions about “The Holocaust”, and fraudulent terminology such as “antisemitism”?

    The most damaging aspect of Judaism and other ideologies derived from “The Old Testament” is not the Terrorist Theocracy of Israel, but the way British Jews have hijacked the English language and dumbed-down the world with their fraudulent terminology based on fake “history”.

    Neither the Jewish problem nor any other serious issue of public policy can be meaningfully addressed without fully exposing the Holy Hoax and other foundational myths perpetuated by Jews and their useful idiots.

    Perhaps the most relevant work on this subject is 1984 by George Orwell.

    What’s the difference between Judaism and Oligarchical Collectivism?

  30. conatus says:

    Almost nine years ago a commenter on another cite , Astraea Shaw said this:

    “Imagine being born from a tense aggressive woman and then, throughout your childhood being kept tense and nervous and aggressive yourself because you are told a hundred times a day that the whole World hates you – that is, all of the rest of Humanity hates you, roughly seven or eight billion Human Beings hate you1 First of all with the hormones which cause aggressive behavior flooding you in utero and then the brainwashing, what chance do you have to be a normal human person? Not much. You are sick. On top of all that you are told that you are superior. How confusing! Then you understand that normal human beings are just cattle actually, and that they are created entirely for your use and they have no other purpose1 Obviously you are very sick indeed. Compassion is bred out of you and you have no conscience nor any shame. You cover the actual feelings of inferiority by being arrogant and you have no capacity or the ability to REASON. How can you? You are living in a World of Human Beings – so many of them, and you are not allowed to like them even. You are basically psychopathic or sociopathic. How could you be anything else. Dignity and honour are completely outside of the experience of these benighted people.”

    • Thanks: RedpilledAF
    • Replies: @Mefobills
  31. annamaria says:
    @JessicaR

    Yet you teach your children the virtue of mass murder of non-Jews.
    Every year the barbaric stories of Purim, complete with cookies in the form of a human ear, are celebrated in the kindergartens, schools, and homes of the allegedly “moral” and “most victimized” followers of Judaic traditions.

    Literally translated as “Haman’s ears” … the pastries celebrate the cutting off of the wicked man’s ears before he was hanged.

    The “wicked man” was Persian, and the murderers were Jews weaseled into his native Persia. Disgusting.

    • Replies: @Anon
  32. Recommend this book, The Controversy of Zion by Douglas Reed, it can be had on amazon and also recommend googling and reading the Protocols of Zion.

  33. The second choice is dependent on a honest examination of its Jewish past, on the admission that Jewish chauvinism and exclusivism exist, and on a honest examination of the attitudes of Judaism towards non-Jews.

    Now that’s a known to all.
    What has rung a bell for me is radical Sunni Islam, more the Saudi version. They have the same hatred of the other, and call for who should be killed.
    But there’s a difference. The murderous impulse that’s evident in Wahabbism will die out shortly with the demise of the Saudis. And that’s a given.
    The Jews meanwhile will carry on a more subtle monetary warfare that’s beyond most people’s comprehension.
    I think they have won in the West as well as in India, Australia and New Zealand.
    China will be tough for them.
    To infiltrate China they have some chinese looking so called “lost tribe” from north east that they have imported from india.

    • Replies: @ptarmigan
  34. With apologies to G. Carlin.

    It’s a BIG club, goyim, and you ain’t in it.

    • Thanks: GomezAdddams
  35. saggy says: • Website
    @Happy Tapir

    For example at one point Shahak asks, how is it that Judaism is so racist when the Old Testament is so humanistic in its message?

    I think you’ve remembered wrong, if I’m wrong I’d like to see the quote. The Torah, or Old Testament, makes the Talmud look tame and humoristic by comparison, it is matter-of-factly genocidal and blood-thirsty throughout, as the book ‘God, the Most Unpleasant Character in All Fiction’ points out … some highlights are given here



    Video Link
    While Shahak’s book is revelatory, the bad news is that Shahak was a full supporter of the holohoax.

    • Replies: @Happy Tapir
  36. @anyone with a brain

    “No true European minded man can believe in semitic religions” – Oh yeah, for sure. Yep, all those Europeans throughout the centuries who adhered to Christianity were not “true European minded” people. Thanks for clarifying the matter.

  37. job says:

    but where is Gilad Atzmon?

  38. Mevashir says:

    Yet you teach your children the virtue of mass murder of non-Jews.
    Every year the barbaric stories of Purim, complete with cookies in the form of a human ear, are celebrated in the kindergartens, schools, and homes of the allegedly “moral” and “most victimized” followers of Judaic traditions.

    Literally translated as “Haman’s ears” … the pastries celebrate the cutting off of the wicked man’s ears before he was hanged.

    The “wicked man” was Persian, and the murderers were Jews weaseled into his native Persia. Disgusting.

    Your comment is one big lie after another:

    1. The Jews were in Persia courtesy of the Babylonian conquest and destruction of their homeland, and their subsequent captivity, not due to being “weaseled” anywhere.

    2. The war depicted in the Book of Esther was a war of self-defense against a genocidal plan hatched by the Persian Prime Minister with the unwitting complicity of the Emperor. The Jews were exercising their 2nd amendment rights. They didn’t attack you so why are you so offended?

    3. The key to the story is that the Emperor could not rescind an earlier decree, in this cause permitting the genocide. All he could do was to authorize the Jews to defend themselves, thus setting the stage for a winner take all battle that the Jews won.

    4. An excellent movie about this story: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r4saPofrlbA

    Gary Demar is a bible teacher who argues that the war of Gog and Magog prophesied in the Book of Ezekiel actually took place in the Book of Esther during the struggle between the Jews of Persia and the followers of Haman. It’s a most ingenious idea that negates the worst forms of contemporary Christian-Zionist apocalypticism:

    • Replies: @anonymous
    , @annamaria
  39. Trinity says:
    @Iva

    Damn, meant to hit agree instead of disagree to your post. I couldn’t agree more with your post.

    Jews, along with their pet negroes are the most hateful and racist people on the planet. Of course the Jew is the heavyweight champion when it comes to hate and racism, the Jew has no equal when it comes to hate, racism, and crimes against humanity. For the most part it appears the so called religion of Judaism is nothing more than a farce.

    • Replies: @Druid55
  40. @saggy

    I thought that myself actually. But I’m pretty sure that’s what Shahak wrote. Maybe you could say relatively humanistic compared to the Talmud. The Hebrew prophets are very universal in their message.

    • Replies: @saggy
  41. Mefobills says:
    @conatus

    Sociopaths are made:

    You are living in a World of Human Beings – so many of them, and you are not allowed to like them even. You are basically psychopathic or sociopathic. How could you be anything else. Dignity and honour are completely outside of the experience of these benighted people.”

    Sociopath:

    https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/basics/sociopathy

    Sociopathy refers to a pattern of antisocial behaviors and attitudes, including manipulation, deceit, aggression, and a lack of empathy for others. Sociopathy is a non-diagnostic term, and it is not synonymous with “psychopathy,” though the overlap leads to frequent confusion. Sociopaths may or may not break the law, but by exploiting and manipulating others, they violate the trust that the human enterprise runs on.

    Being fed Jewish narrative from birth creates sociopaths. Freedom of religion was a profound mistake by the founders. Maybe they thought the cults could not withstand first amendment scrutiny?

    All religions can be analyzed for trigger words and sociopathic conditioning.

    • Replies: @mulga mumblebrain
  42. Chris Moore says: • Website
    @anyone with a brain

    Ethno-nationalism will not solve the Jewish question. Socialism and state atheism will. Any other course of action will permit the existence of large private wealth and that of course will attract the Jews, furthermore Abrahamic religions in order to exist must tolerate Judaism, but not necessarily Judaism tolerate nor respect its religious sects(Christianity and Islam).

    You Marxist-Zionists are hilarious. Christianity solved the “Jewish question” for 2000 years, including the Zionist slave trade problem in the US. It’s only when you Marxist-Zionists fully infiltrated America and started World Wars that the Jewish question came up again. (In the US, it really should have come up again after the Civil War, which would have spared Western Civ WW1 and WW2, and might have if Lincoln wasn’t shot by a deranged, mentally ill, pro-slavery thespian who loved the Hebrew Bible.)

    What you Marxist-Zionists call “anti-Semitic Christianity” solved it once, and it will again.

    • Replies: @ptarmigan
  43. anon[376] • Disclaimer says:

    Shahak is full of shit and i’m a nazi.

    1. all jews were orthodox until 1800.

    2. orthodox judaism is most akin to john calvin’s geneva “precisianism”. it’s like if obsessive compulsive disorder was a religion.

    3. the jealous God became the christian and muslim God, and thus judaism has become more a family than a religion as some haredi jews say themselves. and “judaizers” were still a thing in the dark ages.

    recall: Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye compass sea and land to make one proselyte, and when he is made, ye make him twofold more the child of hell than yourselves.

    judaism went from universal in the time of jesus to particular today. there was one proselyte frequently quoted in the mishnah, onkelos.

    but the idea that whoever has a jewish mother is jewish, the mother the nation, the father the tribe, etc. is a conflation of religion and blood ala nazism. the chosen people idea is evil. and so said soros’s hero popper. and this evil idea has evil consequences.

  44. @Mefobills

    Instead the cult of sociopaths has triumphed, through straight bribery, blackmail and ruthless propaganda, and it is the First Amendment that went, instead. Surely one can see the Divine Hand at work here.

  45. @Iva

    As an elderly survivor of the Nazi Judeocide once observed, ‘Once ‘antisemites’ were people who hated Jews, but now they are people who Jews hate’.

    • Replies: @Chris Moore
  46. @Happy Tapir

    The Old Testament/Torah, the oldest extant description of genocide, its ways and means, and numerous exhortations to commit it and two great ‘religious’ celebrations, Passover and Purim, both celebrating genocide of the Israelites ‘enemies’ (definitely innocents in the Passover case, probably in the case of Purim, although both are, of course, mythical wish-fulfillment), ‘humanistic’?

    • Thanks: Sarah
  47. Anonymous[339] • Disclaimer says:

    Can’t live them and can’t live without them. What are we to do?

  48. anonymous[214] • Disclaimer says:
    @Mevashir

    Your comment is one big lie pile of bovine feces after another:

    In the time of Esther and her uncle Mordecai, the pimp-spy-snitch-murderer, the Persian leadership and people had aided the Hebrews to return to their land and rebuild it. Persians even gave them money to do so.

    Esther & Mordechai chose to remain where the livin’ was easier.

    Jews murdered innocent Persians — people who had aided and sheltered Jews — out of Jewish desire to take the good stuff that other people had.

    Spots, leopards,
    so it goes

    • Thanks: annamaria
  49. Though I did not read the book under review here, I have read Shahak’s, “Jewish Fundamentalism in Israel”, which literally makes Christian Fundamentalists in the United States look like the bastions of pure logic.

    “Jewish Fundamentalism in Israel” is a searing inside look at how the present-day right in Israel along with its ultra-orthodox allies have fomented and promoted the categorically absurd belief system that even modern Judaism has become over so many years.

    However, to get to the current point in time took more than the earlier fringe Israeli Right-Wing as it was primarily prior to the Netanyahu years. What it took was the Israeli Left, which has historically been the bulk of Jewish political thinking. And it was the Jewish Left that were the founders of the Israeli state.

    For such an understanding, one has to read Tikva Honig-Parnass’ book, “False Prophets of Peace”, in which she describes a Left leaning political ideology that literally designed a legal system, first predicated on classic Judaic hatred for gentiles and Arabs, but second, twisted to such an extent in order to make the development of modern law a study in convoluted irrationality.

    For example, everyone here knows how often Israeli promoters have stated that Israel is the only democracy in the Mid East. Well like Shahak’s studies in the Jewish Religion, Parnass demonstrates the same zeal in demonstrating how limited such a statement in reality really is.

    The idea that Israel is the only democracy in the Mid East is founded on a very basic construct, that the Israeli state has elections. The fact that Palestinians have no real voice in such elections and nor do many Gentiles living in Israel is completely ignored by the Israeli politicians and intelligentsia of the state, along with an overwhelming number of Israeli citizens.

    Thus Parnass demonstrates that first the religion forced subordination to the community leaders but the political elite have now fashioned a political system predicated on sheer fantastical political thinking.

    In short, most Israelis are simply bat-shit crazy who have enabled the development of a totally sociopathic state.

    The downside is that sociopathology cannot be cured because of its generational development over so many years, whereas, psychopathology can be managed so that the individual psychopath can actually become a functioning and productive member of society…

  50. @Happy Tapir

    Shahak had a very cliché and inaccurate view of what Sparta stood for. The prime model for a totalitarian society based on mind control was Athens, not Sparta. In Sparta you were a good person if you physically fought for the good cause and proved it through acts of physical heroism : discussion about religious or philosophical ideas was otherwise absolutely free. In Athens you were a good person if the contents of your mind was political correctness and group think, everybody was constantly inquiring about the wrongness of the other’s ideas. You could otherwise behave as a perfect traitor to the common good or asshole if you uphold the common political correctness and submitted to the common mind control : actually there was no concept of res publica in Athens. No blows were barred in business and business was essentially spying and piracy.

    There were many intellectual refugees and consciousness fleeing Athens to Sparta not to undergo Socrates’ fate, NEVER any known case of any one having taken refuge in the reverse direction. The proof and explanation of that is very straightforward : Peloponese had an economy based on the production of physical goods, both through agriculture and crafts, while Attica had an economy based on speculation alone as it lacked proper land for growing enough food and raw materials to make its crafts go. The only natural ressource it had was silver from the time the giant ore deposit of Laurion was discovered, which instantly turned Athens into a money-minting city for the whole Aegean sea region. The tutelary deity of Sparta was not Ares as is commonly and wrongly guessed in pop questionaries : it was Artemis, the goddess of natural order and natural fertility. Athena, most opposite, was the goddess of cunning (sophia : seing in the night without being seen) and dirty tricks (technai), both terms having been bowdlerized in translation as wisdom and arts.

    Between the Helots and the warrior citizens, Sparta had a big middle class of people called the perioikoi, mostly prosperous small farmers and craftsmen who enjoyed full status as law-abiding inhabitants (the only thing they couldn’t do was voting), while in Athens outside the demos, which comprised about 13% of voting-age males of Attica (Athen’s suburbia) and 3% of the greater Athenian-ruled territory, people had zero rights and were subject to absolute arbitrary. There was no Athenian middle class majority as such, dirt-level poverty was the norm, while among the demos (not the people : the exact translation would be the party in the sense of former Eastern bloc countries, with the difference any form of productive work was considered as a blemish, not a virtue) one was called a poor man in need of community support because he could afford only seven slaves. In Sparta the lowest group, the swarthy Helots, comprised 25% of Peloponese about the same proportion as Blacks in states where they are traditionally present in the US. They were never slaves and despite their very low rank and the various humiliations they suffered from were entitled to 50% of the plus-value of their work. In Athens slaves were the majority, followed by the metics who were transitory guest workers.

    Jews always admired Athens, not Sparta, as Athens the city of reference for the other Greek cities where Jews grew so prosperous, especially Alexandria, and had a morality ensconcing speculation as the highest occupation in life. Many Jews even believed they themselves had in reality founded the political system of Athens so as to educate and civilize the rest of Greece, that is to say make that whole white people most docile : Plato believed Athens had been made into a democracy by the “Phoenicians” (ho phoinikos mythos) with the difference he did not consider that influence to be positive but the beginning of the demise of the Greek race. Saint Paul believed in that rumor he never questioned but rather used for his propaganda (first the Jew, then the Greek… along a long pecking order).

  51. saggy says: • Website
    @Happy Tapir

    The Hebrew prophets are very universal in their message.

    ? …. here is 1 Samuel 15:3

    Now go and attack Amalek, and utterly destroy all that they have; do not spare them, but kill both man and woman, child and infant, ox and sheep, camel and donkey.’”

    Here is popular rabbi Manis Friedman saying the same thing today …. https://www.haaretz.com/1.5062382

  52. milosevic says:
    @Priss Factor

    see here (http://daatemet.org.il/en/torah-talmud/daily-peppers/ ] for more pearls of Talmudic wisdom, including these burning issues:

    — Is one who urinates from the roof of the synagogue permitted to hold his sexual organ?

    — How should one remove a snake which sexually desires a woman and enters her sexual organ?

    — On the Sabbath, should one use pottery or a stone to wipe the anus?

    — Is one permitted to learn Torah in the presence of the odor of flatulence?

    — Is it permissible for one to place his sexual organ into his own anus?

    — If a person has sexual relations with his sister, and that same sister is also his aunt on his mother’s side, and his aunt on his father’s side, does that count as one sin, or three?

    • Replies: @Priss Factor
    , @saggy
  53. Trinity says:

    White traitor trash have done more harm to America and Europe than all the smelly Jews and lying Dindus combined. Any way you slice it, it was greedy white traitor trash that are the main culprit in the destruction of the West.

    Thank you, Woody, Cuckhill, Ike, FDR, Trump, Joey Biden, Willie, Dubya, Ronnie,etc.

    • Replies: @Mike Tre
  54. Anon[413] • Disclaimer says:
    @anonymous

    Your rancid comment might be interesting but it has no correspondence with the biblical texts in question. What is the source for your allegation?

    According to Jewish sources, the main Persian assistance for Jews to return to Judea occurred after the story of Esther. in fact these sources say that Esther’s son from the Persian emperor, Darius, was the main facilitator of the Jewish return.

    Besides which, the Jews who remained in Persia did so with the permission of the Persian government and what right did anyone have to genocide them?

    I met an elderly Persian Shiite man who had served in the air Force under the shah. He told me that Esther is revered as the great Jewish queen of Persia and that her gravesite is a national pilgrimage shrine. So your vile comments certainly aren’t accepted even by the Persian enemies of Israel.

    • Replies: @mulga mumblebrain
  55. anonymous[175] • Disclaimer says:
    @Priss Factor

    The issues about Judaism I still dont undesrtand. They are the chosen people less than 6% of the world population…so GOD refuses 94%+ of his creation. NOT one/single book in the Bible is/was written by a Christian..!!! all books were written by jews, for jews, that I a nonjew must obey…why? they wrote under “divine’ inspiration..so they say. many of those books make claims about events that took place allegedly thousand of years before..with NO primary written sources..what a good memory..jews are chosen to save/enlighthen the goyim..with WARS, usury, famine, abortions, pornography, SLAVERY, sex traficking, pedophilia, euthanasia etc. The (christian) Western Ethical standards tell me that I must obey the LAWS moral/religious/civil BUT the jewish Talmud/Torah tells them that they MUST obey jewish laws only…which allow COMMANDS them to rob,steal,lie, cheat. KILL, rape, fraud, the goyim and that GOD absolves them because they are jews…Now they are telling me that “chosen people” is actually a MISinterpretation of the original text..other tell me that such citations were never part of the bible..for example The Gospel of St. John has NOTHING todo with the original gospel written by St John..so are parts of the Bible a fraud of the whole thing is a fraud?? MYTHS….human speculations with no basis on any truth..??? what shall I do???

    • Replies: @Anon
    , @Trinity
  56. annamaria says:
    @Mevashir

    Persians allowed the Jews to reside in Persia.
    Spaniards allowed Jews to reside in Spain.
    Germans allowed Jews to reside in Germany.
    Polish people allowed Jews to reside in Poland.
    Russians allowed Jews to reside in Russia.
    Americans allowed Jews to reside in America.

    The result has been always the same – genocidal activities against the native populations.

    You must start with yourself before accusing others of bad behavior.

    Here is the source of disgust towards the barbaric, obnoxious, and hateful Jewish tribe.

    The Hebrew word shaqetz refers both to unclean animals and to gentile children. In a work known as “The Book of Knowledge”, Jews are instructed to exterminate gentiles with their own hands… In the Hasidic text known as Hatanya, gentiles are considered Satanic creatures. The “Halakhah,” which outlines the legal system of classical Judaism and springs from the Babylonian Talmud, openly approves of war crimes (i.e., the killing of ostensibly good gentile civilians during war). … There is a morning prayer in which Jews thank God for not making them gentiles. In another prayer, the worshipper declares, “and may the apostates have no hope, and all the Christians perish instantly.”

    The Jewish Question would be solved at once if Jews stop parasitizing on the real civilizations (Jews do not have their own civilization) and developed a sense of humility and true respect to other cultures.

    As for Purim, it is nothing but a lesson in genocide against non-Jews, which includes a cannibalistic element. Purim is a ghastly manifestation of Jewish barbarism.

    • Replies: @Sarah
  57. Anon[878] • Disclaimer says:
    @anonymous

    How do you even know the Jews attacked and killed Persians? If your source is from the Book of Esther why do you believe that fact but not the claim of that same book that those very same Persians were going to genocide the Jews, by Imperial decree no less?

    You demonstrate what is called goyish kopf: a mind that does not think consistently and is blinded with irrational hatred and prejudice.

    • Replies: @annamaria
  58. Anon[878] • Disclaimer says:
    @anonymous

    The issues about Judaism I still dont undesrtand. They are the chosen people less than 6% of the world population…so GOD refuses 94%+ of his creation. NOT one/single book in the Bible is/was written by a Christian!!!

    The idea of being Chosen is to serve humanity. This idea is expressed explicitly by Jesus and throughout the New Testament:

    LUKE 22 – Who is the Greatest?
    …25So Jesus declared, “The kings of the Gentiles lord it over them, and those in authority over them call themselves benefactors. 26But you shall not be like them. Instead, the greatest among you should be like the youngest, and the one who leads like the one who serves. 27For who is greater, the one who reclines at the table or the one who serves? Is it not the one who reclines? But I am among you as one who serves.…

    Choseness is more of a responsibility than a privilege. It is best exemplified in the Catholic priesthood. (These people live humble lives unlike the Protestant Evangelical Pastors with their lavish homes, large families, and other perks of office. And not to mention the Fundamentalist Televangelists with their mansions and private jet planes.)

    • LOL: Levtraro
    • Replies: @mulga mumblebrain
  59. saggy says: • Website
    @milosevic

    Wnen a question is raised,

    Is one permitted to learn Torah in the presence of the odor of flatulence?

    one wonders about the answer…. so I followed the links ….

    https://www.sefaria.org/Berakhot.25a.8?lang=bi

    Babylonian Talmud, Tractate Berachot 25a

    They raised a dilemma before Rav Sheshet: What is the legal status of a foul odor that has no visible source, e.g., flatulence? He said to them: Come and see these mats in the study hall, as these students are sleeping on them and these other students are studying, and they are not concerned about foul odors. However, this only applies to Torah study because there is no alternative, but not to the recitation of Shema. And with regard to Torah study we said that it is permitted only when the odor originated with another, but not when it originated with himself.

  60. Trinity says:
    @anonymous

    I think Revelation 2:9 and 3:9 describes a great deal of the Khazar mutts who claim to be Jews.

  61. anonymous[214] • Disclaimer says:

    How do you even know the Jews attacked and killed Persians? If your source is from the Book of Esther why do you believe that fact but not the claim of that same book that those very same Persians were going to genocide the Jews, by Imperial decree no less?

    You demonstrate what is called goyish kopf: a mind that does not think consistently and is blinded with irrational hatred and prejudice.

    Absolutely astonishing comment.

    The key phrase is: were going to.
    My goyish kop focuses on the difference between what you yourself term “a fact” — that Jews killed Persians, and “a (mere) claim” (an unsupported assertion) — that the king issued an irrevocable decree and “somebody” WAS GOING TO DO something to Jews.

    It’s probably true: I have a goyish kopf not a “Jew-brain.”

    The Jew brain invents its own reality, and “what the mind convinces itself is true is true in its consequences.”
    The Jew brain sees into the future, disdains actual evidence, and impugns — twists, rather — motives and actions colored by paranoia and (self)-deception–it perceives what it wants to see; publicizes (propogandizes) that twisted perception in a manner to invert present and future, cause-and-effect and thereby, right-and-wrong in a transparently juvenile of not indeed psychotic act of self-justification.

    To the best of my knowledge, there is no evidence, no document of the “king’s decree” that “cannot be rescinded (what nonsense. He’s the king! He makes the rules!); it is a manufacture of the dissembling minds of Mordecai and Esther.

    It is they — the Jews– who report that they — Jews — killed Haman, his sons, and 75,000 Persians. Why would Jews report, and even celebrate, that “fact” if it had no basis in reality?
    It is Jews, today, who celebrate that genocidal act.

    I have witnessed young Iranians expressing fealty to Esther. It blows my mind. I think she’s a monster, the act was monstrous and has no place in a so-called holy book, but the tale seems to have embedded itself in the “jewish brain.” Dozens of children’s book urge Jewish children, girls especially, to emulate Esther.

    to annamaria: thank you.

    • Replies: @anon
  62. annamaria says:
    @Anon

    Tell us more about Mordekhai.

    Also, tell what other ethnic groups but Jews have a religion that professes hatred against ALL their hosts? Your accusations are a case of projection:

    In a work known as The Book of Knowledge, Jews are instructed to exterminate gentiles with their own hands… In the Hasidic text known as Hatanya, gentiles are considered Satanic creatures. … There is a morning prayer in which Jews thank God for not making them gentiles. In another prayer, the worshipper declares, “and may the apostates have no hope, and all the Christians perish instantly.”

    Try to refute the rabid hatefulness of your ‘sacred’ Jewish teaching.

    As for Purim, it celebrates lies, ethnic arrogance, disrespect towards local traditions, and genocidal hatred towards non-Jews even when they belong to a hospitable host nation:

    Esther and Mordecai are closet Jews. Mordecai warns Esther not to reveal her identity. The people perceive Esther as a lovely Persian woman who has become a Persian queen. …
    The turn in the plot occurs when Mordecai is forced to choose between his inner and outer identities. Is he a Jew or a Persian noble? If he refuses to bow down to Haman, he will almost certainly lose his status among the Persian elite. If he bows, he understands that he will lose his inner Jewish self. In this moment of reckoning, Mordecai recognizes himself as a Jew and refuses to bow.

    After showing disrespect towards the local traditional hierarchy, Mordecai organizes mass slaughter of Persians. Talk about the mind blinded by hatred.

    • Replies: @Anon
    , @mulga mumblebrain
  63. Mike Tre says:
    @El Dato

    …naked and juiced up on Viagra.

  64. Mike Tre says:
    @Trinity

    “Thank you, Woody, Cuckhill, Ike, FDR, Trump, Joey Biden, Willie, Dubya, Ronnie,etc. ”

    This statement reminds me of when Darrell Brooks drove through that Christmas parade last November. the news media reported that a red SUV had killed a bunch of people. They didn’t think to mention who was driving it.

    Those names you mentioned; those guys are the red SUV.

  65. ptarmigan says:
    @annamaria

    No doubt a consequence of their Baal-worshiping,Sumerian/Babylonian,Khazarian lineage.Wasn’t Khazakstan and Ukraine an area unique to the Khazarian (false jews expelled by Russias then Tsar) empire circa 12th century? Then there’s the new city in Khazakistan,replete with illuminati architecture,giant pyramid,sacred geometry etc.There is a whisper this city is the template for the Davos crowd’s ‘New world order’ mecca.

  66. Anon[806] • Disclaimer says:
    @annamaria

    I guess you use your own AnnaMaria translation of the Bible that conveniently eliminates about half the verses of each story.

    Keep lying to us and to yourself. I can assure you that God will pull you up short. His correction is painful if we prove stubborn.

    As much as I detest your attitude, I would not want you to suffer God’s righteous rebuke. So I pray for your repentance and your cessation of lies about His Holy Word.

    In Jesus’ Name Amen!

    • Disagree: Robert Dolan
    • LOL: Levtraro
    • Replies: @Robert Dolan
    , @annamaria
  67. ptarmigan says:
    @Chris Moore

    Also a Freemason,a Talmudist construct and the operating platform for Rothschilds (Sabbatean/Frankists)- Project-America- using his agents Benjamin and Hamilton.Fascinating how there’s even a musical celebrating Hamilton rather than the more worthier fathers such as Jefferson or Andrew Jackson? lndeed what’s this deal with Pelosi rolling out Hamilton cast members for the January 6…memorial lol? All very suspect.

  68. ptarmigan says:
    @Rev. Spooner

    Kaifeng jews of the Li bloodline? maybe in cahoots with the crypto Rockefeller clan who infiltrated China in the 70’s? Therefore as ever by extension,all roads leading to Rothschild-Khazar-mafia seems a safe bet.

  69. Chris Moore says: • Website
    @mulga mumblebrain

    As an elderly survivor of the Nazi Judeocide once observed, ‘Once ‘antisemites’ were people who hated Jews, but now they are people who Jews hate’.

    Nope. The Nazi Judeocide is an exaggerated Zionist myth that’s become dogma and Shoah business. And the ((Jews)) have always hated everyone not ((Jewish)) or Zionist. And they even have contempt for non-((Jewish)) ass-kissers, recognizing them as the pandering stooges they are.

    Their hate is what keeps them intact and motivated. It’s a religion/ethnicity of hate and polarization, and has always been.

    What changed is that the ((Jews)) infiltrated both the British Empire and Communist Empire, who dutifully made opposition to ((Jews)) illegal “anti-Semitism” (in the case of the corrupt Communists) and taboo “anti-Semitism” in the case of the corrupt Anglosphere.

    It’s the opposite of what should be illegal and taboo: pandering and ass-kissing the ((Jews)) for money, power or career advancement. But Communists and Imperialists are just about as shameless, soulless, power-mad and crass as the ((Jews)) themselves.

    • Replies: @Levtraro
  70. So you hate us. What else is new? You folks so much time hating Jews it’s remarkable you have time to get to church and pretend to be Christians.

    • Replies: @annamaria
  71. @Anonymous

    Can’t live without them??? Really? Well, I’m willing to give it a try.

    • Replies: @mulga mumblebrain
  72. Miro23 says:

    Most damningly, Shahak states:

    Before the advent of the modern state the position of the Jews was socially most important, and their internal autonomy greatest, under a regime which was completely retarded to the point of utter degeneracy.

    In other words, Jews readily made alliances with oppressive, degenerate non-Jewish elites and participated with these elites in exploiting the non-Jewish population.

    The reaction against these Jews (and their benefactors) crystallized under German National Socialism. Hitler was a German racist Imperialist (his undoing). If he’d stayed in Germany, he and the Germans would have been OK. But, as it was, he decided to take on the Slavs (allied with the Jews and Anglos) and lost in a replay of the battle of Grunwald.

    Not much sympathy for German militarism and ideas of racial superiority,

    • Replies: @Robert Dolan
    , @annamaria
  73. Jiminy says:

    Books like this should be part of the crt learning regime in classes.

  74. @Miro23

    Oh shutup.

    The Germans were fighting fire with fire and they had every right to do so.

    • Agree: annamaria
  75. @Anon

    Are you in the third grade?

  76. ‘A critical mass of Jews who stop doing this will do much to lift the burden of three thousand years.’

    Wake me up when they get around to it. But what should we do in the meantime?

  77. This book review leaves the impression that the problem is less with Jews than with idiot goyim who allowed themselves to be played.

    Jewish ethnocentrism is problematic for being extroverted than introverted. If Jews want a world of their own, fine. The problem is they also want the whole world as their empire, an ambition that can be realized only by Palestinianizing World Goyim. To create the Jewish State, there had to be Nakba against the Palestinians. Tragic, but if Jews had stopped there, no big deal to the rest of the world. But what is now happening in the West is White Nakba, and it’s largely engineered by Jews who’ve gained control of white elites via bribery, brainwashing, and browbeating.

    But then, maybe Jews wouldn’t have turned out this way if Europeans had just left them alone. If Rome hadn’t invaded Judea and pushed them into exile, Jews might not have spread all throughout Europe, which might have remained gloriously pagan. Also, the European spirit of discovery and world conquest didn’t originate with Jews who nevertheless were useful as money-lenders and investors in the vast enterprises. So, Jews got a taste of World Power via Europeans.

    In the Ancient World, Southern Europeans, esp. the Greeks and Romans, were most aggressive and adventurous. Later, it was the Northern Europeans, without whom Jews wouldn’t have gained World Hegemony. Shahak’s book details how Jews threatened by fellow Jews sometimes sought refuge in the world of kinder white Gentiles governed by more enlightened values and more humane application of the law.
    On the other hand, these very goyim also recklessly drove Europe over the edge in World War I. Some will say the Jewish Hand played a role in the Great War, and I’m sure that was true, but whites often had a compunction to slaughter one another over what now seems like trifles. Granted, some historians say this was the reason for European advancement. Unlike most parts of the world that either remained sparsely populated or came under overwhelming imperial power, rough parity ruled among the European kingdoms/states, and this led to many more wars that fostered innovation in warfare and various technologies; it’s like warring Japan was most open to new ideas when each clan sought superior weapons from European traders. But it also means Europeans got into the habit of treating war as some kind of sports. Most of these wars were resolved quickly, but when the warring parties were well-matched, things got awfully bloody like the matches between Ali and Frazier.

    Kevin MacDonald argued that Jews gained over Anglos and other Europeans because the latter are more individualistic, but I’m not so sure. While modern concepts of individuality and liberty were advanced in the Anglo world(and Netherlands), those societies weren’t governed or defined by principles of individualism but by class, obedience, respect, and conformism. For all practical purposes, individualism had significance only for certain thinkers, adventurers, innovators, and the like. Most people were concerned with fitting in, being approved, seeking validation. Northern Europeans weren’t as clan-based or kinship-oriented as the Greeks and Southern Italians, but they still thought socially and communally than as individuals. If they served as a crew member on a ship, they did as the captain ordered. They were loyal to the firm they worked for, like Bob Cratchit to Ebenezer Scrooge in A CHRISTMAS CAROL. And they were mindful of the class they belonged to. And they were anxious about their respectability and standing in society. Thus, individualism in the Anglo World was rather constricted. Given liberty and individuality’s tendency toward social chaos, social discipline and fear of disapproval were paradoxically the necessary conditions for the increase in freedom. The anarchic urge within liberty had to be tempered by manners and rules. In other words, individuality and liberty had to be merited by a sign of superiority, intelligence, wit, and/or skills.
    Thus, individualism was essentially elitist, and most people, deemed mediocre and uninspired, were expected to just fall in line and conform, do what was necessary to gain approval and avoid opprobrium. The end result was a society where a relative few were deemed superior and worthy of admiration; they deserved more ‘social credit’ in liberty and individuality; the rest should just shut up, fall in line, and obey, which was pretty much the rule in British boarding schools.

    [MORE]

    Of course, Britain eventually loosened up, especially with the rise of Youth Culture popularized by the Beatles, Rolling Stones, and the like. Later, there was the explosion of Punk culture that took it to a whole new (lower)level, especially appealing to Brit youths eager to smash the remaining vestiges of class culture. But, old habits refused to die. Anglo-Britain(and Canada and Australia) remained very much places where most people remained deferential to authority as the best and ‘expert’. Of course, authority came to wear the face of ‘liberal democracy’ and even came to be associated with hipness. It presented itself as ‘lightened up’, disdainful of old hierarchies and snobberies. After all, the Establishment embraced the Beatles, the Royal Family opened up to vulgar celebrities, and the ruling class came to indulge in the same popular culture as the hoi polloi. Still, the formula still remained, “the Best know and the Rest follow”.

    Now, what would constitute the Best? When UK was ruled by awesome race-ists(as the Best of the nation), most Brits fell in line and supported the racial-national agenda. But, if the Best were altered, the Rest would naturally fall in line PRECISELY BECAUSE most Brits never had real individuality of their own — and even popular culture, which felt so joyous and liberating, fostered collective emotions and ‘thought’, the crowd mentality that could be shepherded by the Power; it was more about mass idolatry of godlike celebrities than autonomy of the individual. Is it then surprising that New Britain was hardly more individualistic than Old Britain and in some ways even less so?

    Just look at the rise of ‘woke’ culture and Covid-mania in the UK. A truly individualist society wouldn’t get so crazy. People would ask questions and show some skepticism. But when the Best say so-and-so in the UK, most people just follow along like sheep. They lack the pride and confidence of individuality. What is truly insidious about ‘woke’ ideology or political correctness is it gives the false impression that it’s about the voice of the People and the Powerless. Thus, the brainwashed sheep being led by the nose are fooled into believing they’re struggling against the system. Wow, they knocked down a bloody statue of some past figure who sold slaves! What awesome rebellion against tyranny!
    In truth, UK is now ruled by Jews who, via financial and media control, define what is Best. Jews push ‘wokeness’ to weaken white pride, resolve, and autonomy, all the better to make whites serve ANOTHER power. But because ‘woke’ ideology creates the illusion that ‘white supremacy’ still rules or infests the West, the idiot mobs think they’re fighting the Power by vandalizing old statues. It’s like the moronic Red Guards of the Cultural Revolution who were led to see themselves as rebels when, in truth, Mao merely used them as shock troops to get rid of his political rivals. Contra Kevin MacDonald, individualism wasn’t the dominant mindset among Anglos and Northern Europeans. Rather, it was the individuality of the Best that was respected and rewarded while the Rest were pressured to obey and follow along.

    In contrast, while it’s true Jews have been profoundly tribal, their power also derived from a strong sense of personal individualism, i.e. self-centered pride of individuality has been more common among Jews than among Anglos. While Anglos were into ‘Yes, sir’ and ‘No, sir’ before their superiors, Jews were more likely to be distrustful of their own kind, evento the point of irreverence. It could be Jews were sometimes overzealous to kill/murder other Jews precisely because too many Jews were overly defiant and strong-minded; it’s like, for all the black bitching about ‘racism’, they are most prone to beat up or kill other Negroes cuz the only thing black egomania fears is an ass-whupping.

    It’s also worth noting that Jewish Tribalism wasn’t based on loyalty to a clan leader but to God. Tribalism based on leadership crumbles along with it. It’s about follow-the-leader, so when the leader goes, so does the tribalism. In contrast, tribalism based on the Covenant means everyone within the Tribe is equally blessed by God or some great force; it’s a matter of blood and spirit regardless of who is leader. Anglo tribalism was based on leadership. So, if the leadership lost prestige(with the fall of empire) or cucked to a foreign entity(the Jews or whatever), the whole system came to be fatally compromised. As for Christianity, a universal faith, it wasn’t something the Anglos could claim for themselves. It was only a matter of time before other peoples invoked the Christian God and Jesus to throw back the sermons at the British Imperialists.

    Shahak begins by demonstrating how the Jewish state of Israel exists to serve the interests of Jews first and foremost.

    Well, a Jewish State should serve Jews first and foremost.

    He also describes the financial incentives Israel provides for its Jewish citizens to return to Israel after they leave, while not making similar offers to its non-Jewish citizens in similar circumstances.

    Nothing wrong with that.

    Shahak connects this double standard to the closed society many religiously zealous Jews want Israel to be.

    Jewish problem is less about double standards than duplicitous standards. Every national entity must have double standards. If Japan is to remain Japan, it must favor Japanese over others. Still, a principled people would not only use double-standards in their favor in their own domain but respect similar practices by other peoples in their own domains. So, if Japanese use double-standards to favor Japanese in Japan while respecting Iran’s use of double-standards to favor Iranians in Iran, there’s no real problem.

    But, Jews play a different game. For some reason, not only should Jews use double-standards in favor of Jews in Israel but THE WHOLE WORLD must be made to endorse such behavior, all the while pledging to favor the Other(especially Jews) over their own kind in their own countries. So, while Hungary must praise Israel for being an ethnocentric Jewish State, it mustn’t favor Hungarians in Hungary; Hungarians must abandon any notion of a historical homeland with deep roots and meanings for Hungarians.

    Imagine that. Hungarians have no global ambition and merely want to preserve Hungary as their little nation. In contrast, Jews not only have Israel but use neo-imperialism to smash neighboring Arab nations. Jews also control US and EU and use them as goy attack dogs against Russia, China, and Iran. And yet, these Jews are lecturing the Hungarians about decency and morality. It’s like a billionaire gangster lecturing about the evils of greed to a peasant with a plot of land. Jews want all the goy world to be blackrocked. Jewish supremacists are cretins through and through, but no less disgusting are the goy cucks who grovel at their feet.

    One of Shahak’s main contentions regarding classical Judaism is its totalitarian nature. He mentions how eighteenth-century Jews burned books, persecuted dissidents, banned non-Jewish education, and were absorbed in mysticism.

    I wouldn’t hold this against Jews of that period. We shouldn’t judge past peoples and cultures with today’s values. Were things any more enlightened among Hindus, Muslims, Chinese, Japanese, Ottomans, and etc.? Back then, censorship and authoritarian measures were de rigueur all throughout Europe. Besides, Jews couldn’t have survived for so long as a culture and people without certain restrictions, be they legal, cultural, spiritual, racial, and/or spiritual. Japan was an isolated island-nation but, prior to the arrival of Commodore Perry’s black ships, had done everything to keep Japan sealed tight. Such isolationism kept Japan from progress but also preserved and fostered a unique culture.

    He states bluntly that when Jews were liberated or emancipated throughout the nineteenth century, they were in many case freed from “the tyranny of their own religion” rather than from any gentile oppression.

    Nothing unique in history. Roman Empire was brutal and ruthless but also created Pax Romana in which many people lived in relative peace & prosperity and also gained freedoms and privileges under Roman military and legal protection. It’s like that MONTY PYTHON’S LIFE OF BRIAN scene about “What did the Romans ever do for us?”

    Empires can be liberating on some level. A people may be free of foreign rule but found themselves under crushing autocracy. North Korea is politically independent whereas South Korea is a US satellite, but it’s far more repressive. Hong Kong was a British colony until 1997, but it was freer there than in Mao’s China, which was liberated from foreign rule but crushed under the Chairman’s fat arse. Western Imperial rule over the Muslim World was much resented but also led to modernization. Hindus no doubt gained a lot under British Imperialism. And American Indians(victims of ‘genocide’) and American blacks(shackled under slavery) gained access to ideas and things they never would have on their own. Black moral rage about slavery, for instance, is an adoption of white values as black African culture never had a moral issue with bondage. Also, Jews will say Palestinians shouldn’t complain so much because, all said and done, Arabs living in Israel are better off materially than most Arabs in Arab-ruled countries. Palestinians get less than Jews but still get more than most Arabs elsewhere.

    We can understand why many Jews felt liberated from their own tradition by the Emancipation, but I can also understand why conservative Jewish elements among tried to keep the tradition and community together. After all, no matter how rich and free one becomes, a Jew is no longer Jewish without a powerful sense of blood and culture. Indeed, this is borne out by what’s happened to the white race. Whites got rich and comfy. They came to favor materialism and hedonism as the two pillars of their existence. Result has been utter deracination and decadence. Whites are now so without an identity or loathe the one they have that they pledge fealty to other identities, especially Jewish or Black. Some pretend to be ‘American Indians’. For others, racial self-flagellation is a kind of anti-identity. White ‘conservatives’ prefer to label themselves as Christians, Civil Nationalists, or Libertarians. They are afraid to be True Race-ists, the only way to be free.

    Shahak characterizes pre-emancipated Jewish societies as “sunk in the most abject superstition, fanaticism and ignorance” and describes how in the first Hebrew work on geography (published in 1803), the authors complained about how a great many rabbis were still denying the existence of America.

    Purely from a scientific point of view, this would be true enough. After all, certain Christian folks who still reject evolution and insist the world is 10,000 yrs old come across as ridiculous. But, a culture isn’t only about objective truth but a sense of soul, myth, roots, and cosmology. Culture is essentially irrational and if a people were to totally reject their culture for its irrationality while wholly embracing science/rationalism, they would be lost because humans are more than walking calculators. Worse, even though science is an infinitely superior means for man to reach the moon or cure some disease, it too is the tool of power, evinced by the Covid regimen. Science is a great tool but not The Answer. Also, it doesn’t define a people. It’s agreed that the world is round in Syria, Russia, Japan, Turkey, Mexico, Yemen, Iran, and etc. It’s agreed by all peoples that aspirin reduces pain. But what does that have to do with their sense of who they are as a people and culture? The law of gravity or the chemistry of Vitamin C doesn’t make Jews distinct from Turks or Turks distinct from Iranians.

    Shahak describes how before emancipation, rabbis continually subverted Christian censorship whenever Christians became aware of virulently anti-gentile passages in the Talmud and other writings.

    From the perspective of free speech and honesty, that’s bad stuff. But Jews were hardly alone in that kind of censorship. Through much of US history, most people didn’t know of all the racy and controversial things said by Thomas Jefferson and Abraham Lincoln. In the public lore, Jefferson was Mr. Enlightenment who said ‘all men are created equal’. And Lincoln was portrayed as the Great Emancipator. Most didn’t know what Lincoln really felt about blacks. Historians used to focus on Woodrow Wilson the Progressive, or Mr. Democracy, than on Wilson the ‘racist’ — he was indeed awesomely race-ist. A lot of people don’t know about what Winston Churchill said of the various non-white races and even about Jews(before they bought him off). So much has been bowdlerized or airbrushed out of history. Jews were surely no different. But given Jewish activism in Free Speech and Civil Liberties Movement of the 50s and 60s, Jews do come across as a bunch of lowlife hypocrites and cretins.

    And as for anti-gentile language, there is a lot of it, and not just in the Talmud.

    This is what kills me. The white/Christian world came up with tons of epithets for Jews and nonwhites but in the vernacular, not in canonical writings. In contrast, the sacred texts of Judaism are filled with slurs as if Don Rickles wrote them. Imagine opening up some Christian text and reading stuff like, “you know them Christ-killing money-changing kikes are up to no good”, “we gotta get the ni**ers to believe in Christ as a means to suppress their jungle jiggity uga-buga nature”, or “we need more missionaries in China to convert the lot of them slanty-eyed yellow bastards”. Christian texts might put down other peoples as ‘heathens’ but on the basis of their ignorance, not on their blood. If white Christians said unkind things about nonwhites, it was outside the context of religion. But it seems Jewish sacred texts were into racial name-calling. The Talmud must be full of stuff like, “Get a load of them dumb Polacks. Let’s go exploit them and screw their shikse bimbo whores.”

    In Maimonides’ Guide to the Perplexed, Blacks and some other nomadic races are likened to “mute animals” and “are not on the level of human beings.”

    Maybe Maimonides wasn’t all bad.

    There is a morning prayer in which Jews thank God for not making them gentiles.

    That doesn’t bother me. I think Jewish men also had a practice of thanking God for being men than women… though with tranny business these days, maybe some new passages have been added to the New Talmud that says, “Thank you for removing my balls and giving me a fake ‘vagina’.” If Jews felt pride in being born Jewish, nothing wrong with that.

    they pressured the Catholic Church during the mid-20th century to remove the line about God forgiving Jews in one its Good Friday prayers

    Catholic Church complied, so who is the cuck? We can’t blame Jews or any people for acting in their self-interest, but we can blame whites/Christians for cucking time and time again in the hope that they will be forgiven and loved by Jews. White dummies or whummies need to wake up. If they won’t or can’t, they are beyond hope.

    On the proscription against milking cows on the Sabbath, Shahak writes—hilariously—that according to Zionist rabbis:

    Jewish Logic is pretty ridiculous, but there is something to be said in its favor. First, it is for Jewish interest as they do get the milk on the Sabbath. Also, given the ridiculousness of Sabbath rules to begin with — one isn’t allowed to milk the cow even? — , it seems Jews needed to concoct some ingenious means to circumvent the law. In other words, if the law itself is ridiculous, come up with counter-ridiculous ways to go around it. Now, why couldn’t Jews just do away with the law? It was ordained by God.

    In our time, what is most appalling isn’t the Jewish abuse of laws or legalism to get what they want. It’s vile and rotten, but at the very least, it’s a case of Jews messing with laws to their advantage. Their self-interest makes it somewhat rational.
    What is truly astounding is that so many white goyim go along with it even though it does nothing for the white race. Jews milk ‘ridiculousness’ to get the cream. Whites go along to emerge empty-handed. Granted, we can understand why white cuck elites choose to collaborate. They are taken care of, like the John McCains and Lindsey Grahams of the world. But what about all those white ‘deplorables’ who get NOTHING out of this? Why are they so into “Muh Israel” and “We Luv Jews, Jews, Jews”? Jews are bad, but whites must be DUMB, like Lone Star.

    Jew-on-Jew murder is a capital sin, but Jew-on-gentile murder is not, and is therefore not punishable by any Jewish court

    This wasn’t much different from the racial laws in the American South. White killing a white was a big deal and a Black killing a White was a very big deal, but white killing a black, not so much. And in the West, Whites had to kill Indians to make way for civilization. Of course, today things are reversed. Blacks killing whites or non-blacks(excluding Jews) is no big deal, but whites killing a precious black is a big big deal. The only acceptable murder of a black is by another black, apparently because it’s all in the family. Likewise, the reason why Jews reacted so hysterically to the cases of Leo Frank and the Rosenbergs was they simply couldn’t abide by the notion of inferior goyim killing Jews. In the American South, it was a taboo for even a good black to kill a bad black. Blacks simply weren’t allowed to kill whites. Jews feel likewise about goyim. They feel as the massuhs while all goyim are really a bunch of schvartzes of various colors. But just like blacks once internalized their own inferiority and dutifully served at the feet of the white massuh, it appears so many white goyim internalized their inferiority as well vis-a-vis Jews. To most white Americans, it’s perfectly okay for Jewish Power to use the US military to smash the skulls of millions of Arabs/Muslims, but how dare anyone touch a hair on a single Jew!

    One thing for sure, most whites/Christians believe Jews/Zionists have every right to slaughter Palestinians/Arabs/Muslims, but heaven forbid any Jew get killed by a non-Jew. Zionists killing 100,000s of Arabs is just ‘Israel defending itself’, but if some Muslim kills a Jew in Europe, it is ANTISEMITISM.

    In some ways, things have changed a great deal since the time of Woodrow Wilson. But structurally speaking, not much changed. It’s not that the US is less ‘racist’ but that it’s ‘racist’ about other things. Back in Wilson’s day, it was okay to be ‘racist’ against blacks and even let the KKK march in DC. Today, when Robert E. Lee monuments are being removed in Southern States, a KKK march would be unimaginable. BUT, it’s okay to allow BLM thugs burn down entire parts of DC, vandalize, loot, and randomly attack people. Ostensibly, it’s in the name of ‘anti-racism’, but it’s really an expression of black savage-supremacism with the blessing of Jewish Supremacist Elites who use blacks as the bullwhip against whites emotionally and physically. Use black muscle to intimidate whites, use black narrative to guilt-bait whites. But it’s really about Jewish supremacism and black supremacism working hand in glove. So, the current US is really just as ‘racist’ as it was a hundred years ago. The content is different but the structure is the same.

    https://mondoweiss.net/2022/01/pompeo-at-zoa-gala-israel-is-not-an-occupier/

    And consider US foreign policy. US military is given green light to drop bombs on the Middle East and kill countless ‘sand-ni**ers’ at the behest of Jewish Supremacism, the new ideology of America. While apartheid in South Africa was deemed an absolute evil, Jim Crowitz policies in West Bank must either be supported or ignored. So, the US didn’t go from ‘racism’ and ‘imperialism’ to ‘anti-racism’ and ‘anti-imperialism’ but to ‘neo-racism’ and ‘neo-imperialism’ with new saints and monsters. In 2020, invoking ‘George Floyd’ gave blacks a free pass to rob, loot, burn, and murder. They could act 1000x worse than the KKK ever did, but as Jewish Supremacists rule America and as Jews need blacks to guilt-bait whites, black supremacist savagery is A-Okay.

    For example, a Jew would not be allowed to shove a gentile down a crevice, but if the gentile is already in the crevice, the Jew is under no obligation to pull him out.

    That’s not a bad rule. It’s like the US shouldn’t go around hurting other nations, BUT it is not the role of US to save or bail them out. Let them fix their own problems. The problem is the US goes around the globe claiming to help other peoples while actually causing them great harm, especially in the Middle East and places like Ukraine.

    One crass and recurring example of this was how Jewish doctors would be encouraged to treat wealthy gentiles, including kings, nobles, lords, and the like. But poor gentiles, never.

    But there’s a LOL case. Some Jewish doctor treated Adolf Hitler’s mother, and Hitler was thankful later in life and allowed the doctor safe passage.

    According to one of greatest Jewish scholars of all time, a Jew has license to murder, rape, and molest children as long as the victim is a gentile.

    That’s terrible but Japanese are worse. Even a cursory look at Japanese culture suggests that Japanese regard other Japanese as prostitutes and toy-like playthings. Jews treat goyim as whores, whereas Japanese treat their own kind as whores.

    Gentiles are forbidden to bear testimony in rabbinical courts, since all gentiles are presumed liars.
    Jews must not offer gifts to gentiles.
    Jews must exact interest when lending money to gentiles.
    Jews must never return items lost by a gentile.
    Jews shall not deceive other Jews in business, but may practice “indirect deception” when doing business with a gentile.
    Jews shall not steal without violence from anyone, gentiles included. However, there are certain circumstances under which they may steal with violence from gentiles under their control.
    Jews are forbidden to sell unmovable property (i.e., structure and land) to gentiles in Israel.

    You know, those would be perfectly good laws for whites if ‘Jews’ were replaced by ‘whites’ and ‘gentiles’ were replaced by ‘non-whites’, especially Jews and blacks. Whites need to learn from Jews. Whites need the White Talmud. If any Jew complains about it, just tell him, “We drew inspiration from YOUR culture, and we’re acting just like you.”

    Shahak states further that Judaism is imbued with both hatred and ignorance of Christianity, and that this is largely independent of any Christian persecution of the Jews.

    Jews are right to abhor Christianity as it blasphemes Judaism. What’s rather sad is whites failed to develop their own religion and mythology upon the fall of Rome. They had to rely on heretical Jews. In the long run, Christianity turned out to be an albatross around the white neck. Time has come to move beyond it, especially when a total creep like Devil Pope Francis can rise to the highest authority.

  78. Levtraro says:
    @Wyatt

    You just missed the part about their spreading their crazy religion with a hateful rabid god, and their knack for becoming intermediaries of top gentiles.

  79. @Automatic Slim

    If they were restricted to music, science, literature, art etc, and barred from finance, the media and corruption, I reckon we all could get along fine.

  80. Levtraro says:
    @Chris Moore

    What changed is that the ((Jews)) infiltrated both the British Empire and Communist Empire, who dutifully made opposition to ((Jews)) illegal “anti-Semitism” (in the case of the corrupt Communists) and taboo “anti-Semitism” in the case of the corrupt Anglosphere.

    I think the commies have resisted better than the Anglos. In the Soviet Union Jews were important at the beginning but then were mostly taken out, especially after the 40s with show trials and all that, and the top Jew commie was outed with an ax on his skull. Asian commies have never had any jewish influence at all. This whilst Anglos have been cozy with Jews in an uninterrupted manner over centuries. Other European non-Anglo peoples have turned against and expelled or killed Jews several times. So I tend to think it is more an issue with Anglos. Jews tend to become second fiddle of powerful whites (same as they see them as the chosen servants of god) and they have found Anglos to be the most willing to take them under their wings.

  81. Hibernian says:

    …it’s like if obsessive compulsive disorder was a religion.

    I know very little about Judaism, Orthodox or otherwise, but that is a canard used in attempts to discredit Christianity, especially the Catholic Church, to which I belong. People of faith worship, and regulate their lives, as they sincerely believe that the Lord has commanded them. There are large differences of opinion as to what He has commanded, due to disagreements about Biblical translations, latter day revelation, the role of Sacred Tradition, and what is literal and what is a parable.

    • Replies: @Mevashir
  82. Mevashir says:
    @Hibernian

    Very nicely stated! As a Jewish believer I have explored the Catholic faith and found there is much that attracts me. There’s an organization based in St Louis called the Association of Hebrew Catholics. They follow practices that would have gotten them burned at the stake in Spain 500 years ago. So the Catholic Church has changed considerably over time. Many commenters here would claim to its detriment and long for the good old days of the Inquisition:
    https://www.hebrewcatholic.net/history/
    https://www.hebrewcatholic.net/about-the-ach/

  83. @Levtraro

    John Derbyshire’s latest article agreeing with a Jewess that Asians immigration to the U.S should be banned because they will form an elite class is the height of Anglo subservience to the Jews.

    It is an Anglo tendency and for those reasons Anglo elites are to be kept from power and media. A word of advice to the people of the world, never trust an English speaking country.

    • Replies: @anon
  84. anon[244] • Disclaimer says:
    @anyone with a brain

    all Anglo nations deserve nuking. i’d love to see the fucked-up teeth looking subhumans in the Jewnited Kingdom for example fry.

  85. A more recent synoptic approach to the role of Jewish religion in the development of the contemporary state of Jewish relations with non-Jews is from Laurent Guyanot’s “From Yahweh to Zion”. This work is well-argued and historically informed.

  86. Chris Moore says: • Website
    @Priss Factor

    But then, maybe Jews wouldn’t have turned out this way if Europeans had just left them alone. If Rome hadn’t invaded Judea and pushed them into exile, Jews might not have spread all throughout Europe, which might have remained gloriously pagan. Also, the European spirit of discovery and world conquest didn’t originate with Jews who nevertheless were useful as money-lenders and investors in the vast enterprises. So, Jews got a taste of World Power via Europeans.

    Not through an alternative interpretation of the Bible, which I believe to be correct. In this scenario, Moses was the founder of the religion and the prototype Jew. In fact, he “ethnically cleansed” Golden Calf Hebrews who didn’t measure up morally or spiritually, because they were quick buck artists and grifters out for a good time. He was attempting to build a serious nation, they were decadent partiers and orgiastic pursuers of good times and exotic dark arts who had to be cut out if the nation was to survive.

    In this interpretation, those Grifter Hebrews have had a murderous chip on their shoulder ever since, plotting their revenge and perfecting their dark arts. Slowly but surely they infiltrated the Jews, so that by the time of Jesus, they were in total control, and in deep with the Romans as money changers and collaborators, posing as “authentically Jewish.” (These are deeply sick people, the ultimate traitors, subversives and Mammonites, but very clever in their treason and convincing in their authenticity on a superficial level that Jesus immediately recognized as hypocritical and farcical, kind of like the “patriot” ((neocons/neolibs)) today.)

    It was authentically Jewish Jesus that was in the process of exposing them when they had him assassinated (echoes of JFK?) in order to wipe out the last witness to the Truth.

    These murderous grifter ((Jews)) then went on to be recognized by their Roman partners in crime as the real deal. When the Romans tired of the degenerate and corrupt ((Jews)) that these artificial “leaders” cultivated (scum criminals like Barabbas), they destroyed Jerusalem (similar to the way this corrupt and criminal ((Jewish)) regime is destroying America, using Biden as a front).

    These money changer ((Jews)) have been a plague on the West ever since, simultaneously out for revenge against the Romans (even as they hypocritically continue their role as Empire’s Bankers), and out to infiltrate and destroy Christianity as the final witness to the Truth, in typical ((Jewish)) axe-grinding fashion.

    They’re nuts, evil, treasonous, murderous, envious and subversive on so many different levels, it’s almost impossible to describe depths of their malice. So evil, they almost seem invincible, as if they’ve got every angle covered. And they do, except for one: The Truth.

  87. Chris Moore says: • Website
    @Levtraro

    Asian commies have never had any jewish influence at all.

    Not true. For example see here [Combining Contradictions: Jewish Contribution to the Chinese Revolutions] https://icsum.org.my/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/IJCS-112-1Yitzhak-for-website.pdf

    and here
    [How Jews Brought Decadence Of Weimar Germany To Shanghai And Made It Ripe For Communist Takeover]
    https://christiansfortruth.com/how-jews-brought-decadence-of-weimar-germany-to-shanghai-and-made-it-ripe-for-communist-takeover/

    Evil Chinese Communists are desperate to hide ((Jewish)) influence for the same reason evil Bolshevik Commies have been, and evil Neolib/Neocon regimes are: it proves the vast left/right conspiracy against Christendom: Marxist-Zionism.

    • Replies: @Levtraro
  88. annamaria says:
    @Anon

    Sorry to inform you, but your post (#69) is dripping with hypocrisy.

  89. annamaria says:
    @Dostoevsky

    There is no business like Shoah business.

  90. annamaria says:
    @Miro23

    “the Slavs (allied with the Jews and Anglos)”
    — What are the documents that have convinced you about this alliance?

    • Replies: @Miro23
  91. Levtraro says:
    @Chris Moore

    Did you read the pieces you are quoting as your evidence for Jews infiltrating the Chinese communist revolution?

    The first link to Shichor’s article says that Jews did not participate in revolutionary activities, did not act out of their Jewish identity, and suffer imprisonment after the revolution won, just like Jew bolsheviks were disposed of in communist Russia.

    The second link is pure propaganda.

    So my point that Jews are an issue only with Anglos stands. Anglos have a problem with those peoples. You see them taking many top roles in both the USA and Britain. You don’t see that in any other place except the Ukraine and to a lesser degree in France.

    • Replies: @Chris Moore
  92. annamaria says:
    @Levtraro

    “In the Soviet Union Jews were important at the beginning but then were mostly taken out…”

    — This is what the Jewish immigration to the US wanted the western public to believe in. The facts were very different.

    Stalin’s most likely successor was Lazar Kaganovich, a Jew, mass murderer, and Stalin’s brother-in-law. He lived in comfort till almost 100 years of age (1893 – 1991). Lazar Kaganovich was a butcher of Ukraine but you would never hear his name (despite his crimes, see Holodomor: 6-8 million innocent civilians of all ages died) from the US State Dept. or the zionized Banderites. As a Jew, this mass murderer is untouchable in the US.

    Here is another sample: “Rosalia Zemlyachka [Zalkind]: the worst woman executioner in Russian history” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rosalia_Zemlyachka
    This monster, a vice-president of the Council of People’s Commissars of the USSR, lived a long and comfortable life.

    Phillip Itsikovich Goloschyokin was guilty of genocide in Kazakhstan where 40% of the Kazakh population died on his orders. The crime is known as the Goloschyokin Genocide. This mass murderer was arrested (ironically) for his homosexual activities. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Filipp_Goloshchyokin

    • Replies: @Levtraro
  93. annamaria says:
    @Priss Factor

    Thank you for the excellent essay.

    The suggestion “We drew inspiration from YOUR culture, and we’re acting just like you” is awesome, yet unworthy of a good person. The growing rejection of ziocons and zionists comes from the high moral ground.

    Many Jewish minds are polluted with ethnocentric arrogance and hatred from babyhood. The only viable instrument of reigning over the insane and barbaric Jewish power is the availability of factual information. Jews must be reminded, without hesitation, about their bad deeds towards the native people of Poland, Spain, Germany, Russia, Ukraine.
    A few reparation claims against specific Jewish families of mega-looters will help.

    It is surprising that the claims of antisemitism have never been met with the counterclaims of Jewish ethnic supremacism. Certain Talmudic supremacist dictums and numerous hateful anti-goy pronouncements of rabbis deserve to be aired – and often.

    • Agree: Caruthers
  94. Chris Moore says: • Website
    @Levtraro

    “Now, sure as the sun will cross the sky, this lie is over.”

    • Replies: @Levtraro
  95. Levtraro says:
    @annamaria

    Stalin’s most likely successor was Lazar Kaganovich, a Jew, mass murderer, and Stalin’s brother-in-law.

    Well, that large likelihood was rather void, don’t you think? And you just mentioned 3 Jews, none of them getting any top position in the Soviet Union, so is that enough to deny my assertion that Jews were mostly taken out from the commie system in the Soviet Union during the 40s, including some with show trials for good measure?

    • Replies: @annamaria
  96. Levtraro says:
    @Chris Moore

    I don’t watch videos. Please summarize with text the point you’re trying to make with the video. Recall we are talking about how Anglos are the most Jew-addicted of all the non-Jew peoples, and that Jews have had nearly no business with Asian commies and their revolutions, as demonstrated by your link to the paper by Shichor.

  97. Miro23 says:
    @annamaria

    “the Slavs (allied with the Jews and Anglos)”

    — What are the documents that have convinced you about this alliance?

    I’m thinking more of logistics. For example the large amounts of transport vehicles and canned foods supplied by the US to Soviet troops. It was a de facto alliance between the US and the Soviet Union aimed at defeating Hitler’s Germany. Also Britain’s very costly efforts with its Arctic convoys.

    US Jews already had a lot of influence in the US by 1939 and were pushing for the destruction of Germany. I suppose that this took priority over their dislike of Stalin.

  98. @annamaria

    It’s a myth, of course, but tells a truth or two. 75,000 Persians killed (c. six million in today’s global population)and how many Jews in the struggle? Or did the Jews get others to do the killing, as they do today with the US and its stooges putting the Oded Yinon Plan into action? A very nassty faery tale.

  99. @Anon

    Jews represent less than 0.5% pf the human population. And to assert that most Jews see ‘Chosenness’ as a responsibility, not a privilege, is pure BUNKUM. To quote Rabbi Kook the Elder, former Chief Ashkenazi Rabbi of Palestine c. WW2-‘There is a greater difference between the soul of a Jew and that of a non-Jew…than there is between the soul of a non-Jew and that of an animal’. Some responsibility!

    • Replies: @Anon
  100. @Anon

    But it’s a myth, a faery story, a lie, of Jewish mass slaughter of Persians, not of Jews by Persians. How many Jews died, as they slaughtered ‘75,000 Persians? Were the Persians women and children, as in Gaza, as well as men? Did the Jews get others, say other Persians, to join in the slaughter, or carry it out, as they do with the USA today, in Iraq, Libya, Syria etc? If no Jews died, how was it carried out? Poison? Sneak attack? Divine intervention like Passover, with all those INNOCENT first-born, including animals, slaughtered to Yahweh’s ‘greater glory’?Pernicious rubbish.

  101. annamaria says:
    @Levtraro

    The mentioned three were the most notorious. You need to do your own research.
    The Red Terror was not about Jews. Neither Florensky nor Gumilev was Jewish.

    The most telling sign exposing the lie of antisemitism in Russia was the kind of governmental and academic positions occupied by those Soviet Jews in Russia, who later immigrated to the US. You may want to check the credentials of Zuckenbertg’s parents or the parents of the disgusting Dm. Alperovitch working for the treasonous CrowdStrike (see Clinton’s server story).
    As one commenter has written, the Kagans clan are the progeny of Kaganovich.

    They, the Soviet Jews, suffered so much by receiving free education at one of the excellent Moscow Universities and living in the center of Moscow or St Petersburg. … There were cases of suicide among former Soviet Jews who emigrated to Israel.

    • Replies: @Levtraro
  102. @anonymous

    Well, the Book of Esther is complete fiction anyway, like most of the Old Testament.

  103. anon[390] • Disclaimer says:
    @anonymous

    I have witnessed young Iranians expressing fealty to Esther. It blows my mind. I think she’s a monster, the act was monstrous and has no place in a so-called holy book, but the tale seems to have embedded itself in the “jewish brain.” Dozens of children’s book urge Jewish children, girls especially, to emulate Esther.

    A young southern Judeo-Christian girl (of good genes/physiognomy) told me Esther was her most favorite book in the God-Breathed KJV bible. Later I learn it is like the only book in there that doesn’t even mention their Lord. She’d be one of those who pays to do slave labor in the Holy Land picking grapes for Kosher wine in Israel.

  104. Levtraro says:
    @annamaria

    I do no deny your point that the accusation of anti-semitism against Stalin and the Soviet Union is unfounded. What I am saying is that communists governments (Soviet Union, former Eastern Europe, China and SE Asia) have not been as much afflicted by Jewish infiltration as Anglos, by far.

    • Replies: @annamaria
    , @Mevashir
  105. @HT

    On the whole, their intelligence is seriously exaggerated. And I think you mean the Ashkenazi (or European) Jews, since no one has ever made any significant claims about the intelligence of the Sephardic or Mizrahi Jews (or any other Jewish subgroup, for that matter).

    To find out how the game works, look into what’s been going on around Monroe, New York, and places like Kiryas Joel.

  106. Sarah says:
    @annamaria

    As for Purim, it is nothing but a lesson in genocide against non-Jews, which includes a cannibalistic element. Purim is a ghastly manifestation of Jewish barbarism.

    What do you think of the Christian mass, when the attendants eat the body of their own god, even if in symbolic form (osties)?

    • Replies: @annamaria
    , @Anon
  107. annamaria says:
    @Levtraro

    “communists governments (Soviet Union, former Eastern Europe, China and SE Asia) have not been as much afflicted by Jewish infiltration as Anglos, by far.”

    –It depends on “when.” The current UK/US governments are thoroughly zionized, whereas the Russian Federation is less infected. As for the first USSR government, according to Putin, it was “85% Jewish.” The same observations had been expressed by numerous contemporary journalists. One of the Jewish papers in the US triumphantly proclaimed that the Bolshevik revolution in Russia was “Jewish revolution,” which was true. Churchill (whom I personally despised) wrote about Jews playing “the prominent, if not indeed the principal part in the system of terrorism or red terror.”

    Today, some in Hungary worry that zionists are going to take an upper hand in this beautiful country peopled by intelligent and laborious individuals. Poland seems a lost cause anyway.

    In lieu of the wealth of the documented atrocities committed by Jews in Russia, one can only marvel at the tolerance and forgiveness of the Russian people. This is the complete opposite of the vicious hatred that the Jewish community at large has been showing towards Russians and Russian civilization.

    The anti-Russian dealings of the Friends of Israel (Conservative and Liberal) in the UK make a convincing argument for the terrible affliction of the Brits by the zi0nism. As for the US, it is in a deadly embrace of a zionist python. All these Pelosies and Pences have been busy selling the US future in exchange for the AIPAC benevolence.

    • Replies: @Levtraro
  108. annamaria says:
    @Sarah

    As far as I know, the Christian mass celebrates unity and rebirth.
    Purim celebrates the mass murder of non-Jews. Moreover, during Purim, young Jewish children are given cookies in the form of a body part of the “Amalek.” The hatred is instilled from babyhood.
    It seems that you are unable to grasp the difference.

  109. Anon[351] • Disclaimer says:
    @mulga mumblebrain

    I did not say most Jews see Choseness as responsibility rather than privilege. I said this is its ideal concept that is best exemplified in the Roman Catholic Church. Christianity has elevated the concept of Choseness from tribal ethnic privilege to global humanitarian service.

    If you’d read our comments more carefully you wouldn’t need to react with such ridiculous hysteria!

    As for your later comment regarding the Book of Esther, if you think it’s fictional does that include the claim that the Jews killed 75,000 Persians? Do you think the entire story is legendary or only the parts that legitimize Jewish self-defense?

    If the latter, then I recommend you seek employment in the agricultural sector as a cherry picker. I don’t know if they grow cherries down in Australia, but if you can manage to turn off the cheap Bollywood soft-porn from your TV you can go out and start looking for gainful employment.

    Print out this comment as my letter of recommendation for you.

  110. Anon[351] • Disclaimer says:
    @Sarah

    Great question. Don’t count on her giving an honest answer. She ignores the verses in the Book of Esther where the Persian Emperor authorizes the Jews to fight against their Amalekite enemies. So if the Jews behaved with barbarism they were given the green-light straight from the top of the Persian throne.

    Ultimately perhaps she is disappointed that the Jews 2500 years ago staved off an attempt at their genocide leaving the job to Hitler in more recent times. She wishes that good German man had been spared the unpleasant task by his Aryan Persian ancestors. LOL

    • Thanks: Sarah
  111. Mevashir says:
    @Levtraro

    I’ve read that many of the top Soviet political echelon were married to Jewish women. I’ve also read that many of the gulag camp doctors and kommandants were Jews. Obviously Jews were not involved with Asian Communism but with regard to Russia and Eastern Europe I think they were extremely prominent.

    • Replies: @Levtraro
  112. Levtraro says:
    @annamaria

    –It depends on “when.” The current UK/US governments are thoroughly zionized, whereas the Russian Federation is less infected. As for the first USSR government, according to Putin, it was “85% Jewish.”

    Annamaria, this is the last time I repeat my argument. I said that AFTER THE 40s the Soviet Union got rid of most Jewish leadership (including the top one with an ax on his skull and a few show trials for those in the country) so their hold on Russia since the revolution (which I acknowledge) was short-lived, unlike Anglos, a group of Whites that have had Jews as partners in crime for centuries.

    • Agree: anyone with a brain
    • Replies: @Chris Moore
  113. Levtraro says:
    @Mevashir

    They were extremely important in the Soviet Union at the beginning but from the 40s (starting with the execution of that disgusting character living in Mexico) they became much less important and there certainly were govt campaigns against them, search info about “Night of the Murdered Poets” and the “Doctor’s Plot”. The Soviet Union opposed Zionism and Stalin often referred to Jews as rootless cosmopolitans and bourgeois. In addition there were ideological reasons in the communist doctrine to oppose Zionism, although ultimately Stalin supported giving away Palestine to the Jews. Soon after the creation of the Jewish state the Soviet Union sided with Arabs and even used the word “fascist” to describ the policies of Israel. Bottomline, European and Asian communists are clearly much more inmune to Jewish influence than Anglos, which was my original argument in this thread.

    • Replies: @Mevashir
  114. Chris Moore says: • Website
    @Anon

    the Book of Esther where the Persian Emperor authorizes the Jews to fight against their Amalekite enemies. So if the Jews behaved with barbarism they were given the green-light straight from the top of the Persian throne.

    ((Jewish)) fifth columns always do this: they infiltrate the seats of power, corrupt and bribe them, and then have their way.

    They did this to the USA when they staged 9/11 and used it as a pretext to continue the Zionist war on “Islamofascism” (Arabs and Muslims).

  115. annamaria says:
    @Anon

    “Do you think the entire story is legendary or only the parts that legitimize Jewish self-defense?”

    — The entire story of the Bolshevik Revolution IS NOT legendary and it is filled with the facts of the sadistic tortures and mass murders conducted by Jewish men and women in Russia (Ukraine, Kazakhstan).

    Perhaps if Jewish ‘religion’ was more decent and humane, there would be fewer innocent dead people of all ages, whether in Russia and Ukraine or in the Middle Eastern countries.

    Reign your psychopathological and ethnocentric sadist first before lecturing others on morality and ‘antisemitism.’
    Also, it will help if the Jews stop shoveling the fraudulent Shoa biz down the decent people’s throats. Remember the Bolshevik Revolution.
    https://www.veteranstoday.com/2018/07/18/the-brutal-murder-of-tsar-nicholas-ii-and-his-family/

    of thirty-one top Soviet leaders, all but Lenin were Jews [Johnson’s book came out in 1987; later documents revealed that Lenin was also a Jew]; another analyzed the members of the Petrograd Soviet, showing that only sixteen out of 388 were Russians, the rest being Jews, of whom 265 came from New York’s East Side. A third document showed that the decision to overthrow the Tsar’s government was actually taken on 14 February 1916 by a group of New York Jews including the millionaire Jacob Schiff. …

    Philippe (Shaya-Isay Fram) Goloshchyokin, personal and plenipotentiary ambassador of Yakov Sverdlov, dealt with all the gang’s organisation detail.

    https://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/6.jpg

    Leading executioners of the Imperial family whose Jewish names appear in brackets. Left to right: Top (Yankel Solomon Movshevich Sverdlov) Yakov Sverdlov, Philippe Goloshchyokin (Shaya-Isay Fram Goloshchekin) and Pyotr Voykov (Pinhus Wainer). Bottom row: Alexander Georgievich Beloborodov (Vaisbart Yankel Isidorovich), Konstantin Myachin (Vasily Yakovlev) and Georgy Safarov (Voldin)

    • Replies: @Mevashir
  116. Chris Moore says: • Website
    @Levtraro

    AFTER THE 40s the Soviet Union got rid of most Jewish leadership (including the top one with an ax on his skull and a few show trials for those in the country) so their hold on Russia since the revolution (which I acknowledge) was short-lived

    That’s a ((Jewish)) lie. From a review of Slezkine’s “The Jewish Century” https://rense.com/general87/century.htm

    It was only with the great purge of 1938-1939 that Jews began to lose some of their influence in the upper levels. But even then, as Slezkine demonstrates, Jews were not, contrary to popular misconception, singled out for persecution. Their share of the victims was lower, on a percentage basis, than that of the other groups targeted, such as Poles or Latvians. Unlike these groups, who were tainted by foreign loyalties, Jews were not perceived as being inherently disloyal to the Soviet regime. Only in the post-war purges of Zionists and cosmopolitans were Jews targeted as such. Of course, the creation of the state of Israel created a potential ­ and actual ­ dual loyalty problem. Stalin, who had personally witnessed the old pre-revolutionary struggle of the 1880’s onward, was well aware of how many Jewish comrades in the Russian Social Democratic Labor Party had preferred their communist state in Palestine rather than in Russia. With Israel’s creation in 1948 many Jewish communists who had spent their lives loyally serving the Bolshevik state were filled with enthusiasm for communism (“Next year in Jerusalem”!). Slezkine notes that the anti-Jewish purges moderated, then ceased, following Stalin’s death, but the amazing Jewish preponderance in the hierarchy of “scientific socialism” was never totally regained. Jews did, however, remain prominent in cultural and professional circles until the very end of the Soviet regime.

    So why are you telling Marxist-Zionist lies? You continue:

    their hold on Russia since the revolution (which I acknowledge) was short-lived, unlike Anglos, a group of Whites that have had Jews as partners in crime for centuries.

    Thanks to the elite ((Jewish)) fifth column “Cousinhood,” which today operates under Marxist-Zionist principles.
    https://www.commentary.org/articles/chaim-raphael/our-english-crowd/

    You Marxist-Zionists really are disgusting specimens, the way you go about rewriting history to conform to the ((Jewish)) need of the moment.

    Orwell exposed what becomes of you in 1984, and what become of the entire human race due to “tolerance” for ((Jews)) and their stooges.

    • Replies: @Levtraro
  117. annamaria says:
    @Anon

    “if the Jews behaved with barbarism…”

    Yes, the tribe is profoundly barbaric. Jews have committed the gravest mass murders in the 20th century. Your allegedly righteous posts force others to remind Jews about the Armenian genocide (see the so-called Young Turks or Dönmeh the Sabbatean crypto-Jews), the genocide of Kazakhs (see the Goloschyokin Genocide that eliminated 40% of Kazakhs), the genocide of Ukrainians (see Lazar Kaganovich and Holodomor that killed 6-8 millions of Ukrainians), and the genocide of Russians by Jewish Bolsheviks.

    You must understand, the leading Bolsheviks who took over Russia were not Russians. They hated Russians. They hated Christians. Driven by ethnic hatred they tortured and slaughtered millions of Russians without a shred of human remorse. It cannot be overstated. Bolshevism committed the greatest human slaughter of all time. The fact that most of the world is ignorant and uncaring about this enormous crime is proof that the global media is in the hands of the perpetrators (the Jews).”

    Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn (1918-2008), Russian Novelist and Historian

    This is for you and your pretense of being a zionist Christian:

    Bolshevism committed the greatest human slaughter of all time. The fact that most of the world is ignorant and uncaring about this enormous crime is proof that the global media is in the hands of the perpetrators (the Jews).”

    • Agree: Mevashir
  118. Mevashir says:
    @annamaria

    I agree with most of what you wrote here. I would never justify the actions of the Jewish Bolsheviks in Russia.

    But you are missing the point of the Book of Esther. The Jews who defended their lives never overthrew the Persian Empire. That was done many years later by a Greek general named Alexander the Great.

    Before you make too many erroneous assumptions about me, see this letter I recently sent to Alan Dershowitz regarding his support for the Israeli terror regime:
    https://drive.google.com/file/d/12UP7nChJN9AvexJonkBi1bZKPxYSawJT/view?usp=drivesdk

    • Thanks: Sarah
    • Replies: @annamaria
    , @Sarah
  119. Druid55 says:
    @Trinity

    Agree. And I find blacks to be extremely racist as well. I just had a “discussion “ with an elderly kenyan c/o racism/whites, etc. yet he moved to the USA. Our borders need to be sealed to trash

  120. Caruthers says:
    @Levtraro

    Jews are more individualistic within Gentile cultures than are Gentiles, but that is because they despise Gentile culture and law.
    However, living in their rabbi-ruled ghettoes, if anything they were less individualistic, and less likely to buck authority. There are more Galileos rebelling against the prevailing orthodoxy and authority than Spinozas.
    And Jews actually seem more prone to fanatical reverence of charismatic individuals (e.g., Schneerson, Freud, Leo Strauss) than are Gentiles.

  121. Mevashir says:
    @Levtraro

    Maybe you are arguing that in Russia the Jews became subverted to the Communist agenda, while in the Anglosphere society is subverted to the Jewish agenda. Is that correct?

    How do you explain Putin’s fierce loyalty to both Russian Jewish interests and to Israeli Zionism, despite his claim to being a devout Russian Orthodox Christian?

    • Replies: @Levtraro
  122. Caruthers says:
    @Priss Factor

    Jews are more individualistic within Gentile cultures than are Gentiles, but that is because they despise Gentile culture and law.
    However, living in their rabbi-ruled ghettoes, if anything they were less individualistic, and less likely to buck authority. There are more Galileos rebelling against the prevailing orthodoxy and authority than Spinozas.
    And Jews actually seem more prone to fanatical reverence for charismatic individuals (e.g., Schneerson, Freud, Leo Strauss) than are Gentiles.

    • Replies: @Priss Factor
  123. @Caruthers

    However, living in their rabbi-ruled ghettoes, if anything they were less individualistic, and less likely to buck authority.

    But keep in mind Jews were also prominent as merchants, and it takes some hustling and chutzpah to be good at business.

    Also, rabbinical studies were different from learning in most parts of the world. Hinduism and Confucianism were mostly about rote-learning. Islam too. Christians believed the Messiah already arrives, so there wasn’t much to think about. Just have faith. Muslims also believe Muhammad was the last Prophet and the Koran is the final answer.

    In contrast, the Messiah had yet to come for the Jews, therefore there was no sense of finality to Jewish thinking. And because the Torah is so contradictory, the Jewish practice of Talmudic studies allowed for endless interpretations that fostered intellectual creativity and contrivances, the kind of game won by those with strong individuality of intellect.

    • Thanks: Sarah
    • Replies: @Caruthers
  124. annamaria says:
    @Mevashir

    Thank you for your courteous response.

    My point was about the pernicious indoctrination of Jewish children with hatred towards non-Jews.

  125. Fr. John says:

    The simple fact of the matter is this:

    As Justin Martyr so clearly said, ‘Christ is our King, and Christianity is our race which you knew once as Israel.”

    Or, as Hilaire Belloc also stated, just a century ago. “Europe is the Faith; the Faith, Europe.’

    Jews are just ENVIOUS of White Christendom. That has been so, for 2000 years.

    • Replies: @artichoke
  126. artichoke says:

    “A critical mass of Jews who stop doing this will do much to lift the burden of three thousand years.”

    Baloney — or “critical mass” will just be defined so as to excuse the antisemites continuing to attack Jews for the same things everyone else has done. Jews are special in that given the ability to commit great atrocities and genocides — they are smart and capable — they have not done so.

    • Replies: @geokat62
  127. artichoke says:
    @Fr. John

    Wouldn’t those who are envious have become Jews for JC already? What is the reason for envy, when they could simply become what they are supposedly envious of?

    Maybe that doesn’t work if Nuremberg Laws are in effect, but I don’t assume that’s what you had in mind.

  128. @Anon

    ‘Amalekite’ is Judaic code for ‘those who must be exterminated’. It is an interesting death-cult that sees enemies who MUST be exterminated EVERYWHERE, throughout history. Pity the poor Palestinians, whose genocide is called for EVERY day inside Israel.

  129. Levtraro says:
    @Chris Moore

    Thanks, your quote of Slezkine’s “The Jewish Century” is very relevant and it confirms my point. Jews were purged and removed from the highest positions after the 40s: “It was only with the great purge of 1938-1939 that Jews began to lose some of their influence in the upper levels”. This quote differs in degree with my argument but it helps to show a difference in the period from the revolution to the 40s and from the 40s to the end of the Soviet Union: during the 1st period Jews were a large part of the leadership and during the second period they were not persecuted as Jews but they lost their positions at the highest levels of the hierarchy. Good for Stalin.

    On the other hand Jews in Anglo countries have gone up and up uninterruptedly and now they are a large fraction of top positions in the USA and in Britain.

    I would not quote Orwell too much, he was a snitch at the end of his life, bad way to go, in dishonour.

    • Replies: @Chris Moore
  130. @Anon

    Of course Purim is myth. The murder of 75,000 Persians is simply genocidal Judaic wish-fulfillment. Genocide is central to the Judaic cult, mostly inflicted BY the Jews on various goyim, from the Book of Joshua onwards, then, tragically, inflicted ON Jews by the Romans, various others, and most hideously by the Nazis and their allies.

  131. Levtraro says:
    @Mevashir

    Maybe you are arguing that in Russia the Jews became subverted to the Communist agenda, while in the Anglosphere society is subverted to the Jewish agenda. Is that correct?

    That, and that Jews lost their hold of Russia after the 40s and that commies are more inmune to Jewish infiltrations than Anglos.

    How do you explain Putin’s fierce loyalty to both Russian Jewish interests and to Israeli Zionism, despite his claim to being a devout Russian Orthodox Christian?

    I doubt you have any intel into Putin’s thinking to claim to know how fierce his loyalties are. As for his actions, he faced Jewish oligarchs and sent some to prison, some to exile in London, and forced the others to bend the knee.

    • Replies: @Mevashir
  132. Sarah says:
    @Mevashir

    https://drive.google.com/file/d/12UP7nChJN9AvexJonkBi1bZKPxYSawJT/view?usp=drivesdk

    Thank you for the link to your letter. It contains essential points to remember.

    • Replies: @Mevashir
  133. geokat62 says:
    @artichoke

    Jews are special in that given the ability to commit great atrocities and genocides — they are smart and capable — they have not done so.

    So true!

    “But combine them together with the relatively tiny size of worldwide Jewry, around 16 million prior to World War II, and the inescapable conclusion is that in per capita terms Jews were the greatest mass-murderers of the twentieth century, holding that unfortunate distinction by an enormous margin and with no other nationality coming even remotely close. And yet, by the astonishing alchemy of Hollywood, the greatest killers of the last one hundred years have somehow been transmuted into being seen as the greatest victims, a transformation so seemingly implausible that future generations will surely be left gasping in awe.” – Ron Unz

  134. Mevashir says:
    @Levtraro

    Putin’s friendship with Chief Rabbi Lazar of Russia, a Lubavitcher — who are the most anti-Christian of all Jewish sects — is well known. As is his friendship with Netanyahu. Look at Russian policy in Syria which gives Israel carte blanche to bomb that country with impunity. Try Google if you want specific sources.

    Putin bought a luxury apartment in Tel Aviv for his former high school German language teacher and today, following her death, he owns the apartment himself.

    There’s even a video of Putin being interviewed by Megyn Kelly where he says that the claim of Russian interference in Trump’s 2016 electoral victory amounts to the claim of anti-Semites that the Jews are to blame for everything. Then he turns to Kelly and says: “You’re an idiot and can’t do anything but the Jews are to blame.”

    See at 4:50 here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X-H5BXyfbwk

    • Replies: @Chris Moore
    , @Levtraro
  135. Chris Moore says: • Website
    @Levtraro

    Good for Stalin. On the other hand Jews in Anglo countries have gone up and up uninterruptedly and now they are a large fraction of top positions in the USA and in Britain.

    Good for Stalin? He partnered with ((Jews)) in mass murder and terror for much of his career, just like the elite Anglo monsters. So when the mass killer and nation wrecker has a falling out with his partners in crime, he suddenly becomes worthy of accolades? Why did he partner with evil to begin with? Because he was evil.

    Which is my point: anyone who has ever been in bed with ((Jews)) and their crimes against humanity is evil and irredeemable, what Hillary Clinton has projected onto average Americans who oppose neolib/neocon mass murder.

    One suspects you would secretly agree with Hillary Clinton. One suspects you’re a ((Jew)) or a Zoglodyte who has the exact same mentality with regard to the “goyim” and “deplorables” as Anglo monster Hillary Clinton.

    • Replies: @Levtraro
  136. Chris Moore says: • Website
    @Mevashir

    Putin needs to acknowledge that ((Jews)) aren’t really Jews in the vein of Moses, and that there are no more “Jews.” But he can’t, you see, because the Russian regime was in bed with evil ((Jews)) from 1917 all the way through WW2, through today, just like the evil Anglo regimes (from 1913 through today). That makes his regime complicit in the atrocities of the 20th Century, just like the Anglo regimes.

    And to add insult to injury, they’re both complicit in the “Holocaust” Big Lie, as well.

    This is how the ((Jews)) trap morally and spiritually weak leaders in their Zionist grift: they gradually implicate them in bigger and bigger lies, treason and crimes, until the entire global political class is complicit in their crimes.

    Oh what a wicked web we weave, when first we practice to deceive.

    • Replies: @Mevashir
  137. Mevashir says:
    @Chris Moore

    Very well stated!

    https://mfa.gov.il/MFA/PressRoom/2018/Pages/PM-Netanyahu-attends-Victory-Day-Parade-in-Moscow-along-with-Russian-President-Putin-and-Serb-President-Vucic.aspx
    https://www.israeldefense.co.il/en/node/34143

    I used to avidly follow Brother Nathanael, who’s an ardent admirer of Putin. There is much about Putin to admire. He is smart and articulate. However I became suspicious when he repeatedly endorsed the official US cover-up of the 9/11 attacks. His supporters make all sorts of excuses for him, but I’ve run out of patience.

    • Replies: @Chris Moore
  138. Chris Moore says: • Website
    @Mevashir

    I used to avidly follow Brother Nathanael, who’s an ardent admirer of Putin. There is much about Putin to admire. He is smart and articulate. However I became suspicious when he repeatedly endorsed the official US cover-up of the 9/11 attacks. His supporters make all sorts of excuses for him, but I’ve run out of patience.

    Brother Nathanael is a wise critic of the ((Jews)) but he’s caught up in Orthodox sectarianism, so he’s got to defend the “ego” of the Russian Orthodox Church, which means defending Putin.

    And yet, unlike Putin, he totally rejects “Holocaust” dogma, and most other ZOG conventions (like the 9/11 narrative). So Putin and the Orthodox Church would repudiate him, and I believe the Church has.

    I really respect him, though, because he’s gone further than 99.999 percent in see seeing through the ((Jews)) but apparently he just can’t get over his need for validation from institutional Orthodoxy.

    This egoistic need for institutional validation is yet another trick of the ((Jews)). If they can get control of all respectable institutions, or at least implicate their leadership, then most everyone below has to kowtow to The Narrative in order to be “respectable” and “acceptable” (and to get rich, too). This applies across the spectrum from religious to secular.

    I use the handy acronym PIGGS WVELL to identify the ten sins that lead to ((Jew)) stoogery and Zoglodytism: Pride Ignorance Greed Gluttony Wrath Vanity Envy Lust License.

    In this formulation, Brother Nathaneal is guilty of Pride (ego), which has confused his quest for Truth.

    I’ve been guilty of more than that myself. But Jesus is perfect so we don’t have to be, but he expects us to keep trying, I think. So someday…

    • Replies: @Mevashir
  139. Mevashir says:
    @Chris Moore

    How does your list of 10 deadly sins differ from the Catholic seven deadly sins?

    As far as needing institutional affirmation, I think that’s a trait common to all humans. From what I know Brother Nathanael lives in almost total seclusion. Long ago he was a member of a rock group and apparently was in love with the violinist, who repudiated him for some reason. I could never live the solitary life he lives, so I very much admire him for that.

    I think Putin is a fantastic leader and probably the most clever global diplomat. But his willingness to play along with the US 9/11 cover-up game disappoints me.

    • Replies: @Chris Moore
  140. Caruthers says:
    @Priss Factor

    In contrast, the Messiah had yet to come for the Jews, therefore there was no sense of finality to Jewish thinking. And because the Torah is so contradictory, the Jewish practice of Talmudic studies allowed for endless interpretations that fostered intellectual creativity and contrivances, the kind of game won by those with strong individuality of intellect.

    There are different types of individualism.

    One type is individualism or independence of thought.
    To a greater extent, Christians demanded and obsessed over absolute conformity of professed belief on the minutest details of religious dogma. For example, Isaac Newton, whose claim to being the supreme intellect in history is as strong as anyone’s, was a fanatical Arian (i.e., he believed the Father begot the Son, who is therefore distinct from, and subordinate to, the Father), but he had to conceal that view from his contemporaries, to whom it was a shocking and intolerable heresy.
    However, Christians could and would also speculate about and study other fields, such as mathematics, geography, engineering, etc., provided they were not led thereby to question religious dogmas.
    On the other hand, Jews far more rigidly prescribed and circumscribed behavior, insisting on the performance of labyrinthine and excruciatingly detailed rituals governing all aspects of daily living. As Israel Shahak noted, ritual was paramount, belief was secondary. Noam Chomsky, in an interview, confirmed this mindless preoccupation with ritual in connection with his orthodox grandfather. He relates how every minute aspect of the grandfather’s life was governed by ritualized Talmudic prescriptions, but when asked (presumably by his grandson Noam) whether he believed such-and-such, the grandfather would reply with indifference (in Chomsky’s words), “I suppose so.”
    True, Jews encouraged vigorous debate, but within very narrow boundaries: the interpretation of the Talmud. They refrained from serious study or investigation into anything else (mathematics, science, painting, music), on the grounds that it is of Gentile origin and is therefore inferior and profane.
    In conclusion: before their emancipation from their rabbi-ruled ghettoes, Jews were more independent-minded and individualistic than Western Christians in some respects, but less so in others.
    After their emancipation and entrance into European society, they tended to be more inclined to challenge and question accepted norms, more independent-minded and individualistic, mainly, as MacDonald posits, because they had little “hereditary” respect for Gentile customs, and often were hostile and contemptuous.

    However, in another important respect, Europeans were clearly much more individualistic than Jews.
    In Christianity, virtue was an individual matter. Every Christian was individually rewarded or punished in the afterlife for his individual faith or lack thereof. Ascetics and monks, who secluded themselves from societal interactions and devoted themselves wholly to prayer, were often revered the most highly as paragons of virtue.
    Jews, on the contrary, laid very little emphasis on the afterlife. Instead they believed in collective rewards or punishments in this world: good Jewish behavior was rewarded with the prosperity of the Jewish community in this world, and bad Jewish behavior was similarly punished by the suffering of the Jewish community.
    There is nothing analogous to the monk in the Jewish religion, because one cannot enrich and benefit the Jewish people if he is cloistered away in a monastery.
    So in Christianity, the good is individual faith, to be rewarded individually in the afterlife. In the Jewish religion, the good is the prosperity of the Jewish people and the maintenance of Jewish cohesion and separateness, with rewards and punishments administered to the Jewish community in the secular world.

    • Thanks: Sarah
    • Replies: @Mevashir
  141. Levtraro says:
    @Mevashir

    Lol!

    Putin’s friendship with Chief Rabbi Lazar of Russia, a Lubavitcher — who are the most anti-Christian of all Jewish sects — is well known. As is his friendship with Netanyahu. Look at Russian policy in Syria which gives Israel carte blanche to bomb that country with impunity. Try Google if you want specific sources.

    So you don’t know why Putin let Israel bomb some locations in Syria. It’s not what you think. So Putin is polite with some Jews and you tear your garments. What did you expect from a head of state?

    Putin bought a luxury apartment in Tel Aviv for his former high school German language teacher and today, following her death, he owns the apartment himself.

    You don’t know that.

    • Replies: @Mevashir
  142. Levtraro says:
    @Chris Moore

    Lol!

    Don’t get lost in your rage. This is the topic under discussion. European and Asian commies are fairly inmune to Jewish infiltration while Anglos are extremely susceptible. Look at the current govt of the USA.

    • Agree: anyone with a brain
    • Replies: @Chris Moore
  143. Chris Moore says: • Website
    @Mevashir

    …woops, forgot “Sloth,” which could include addictions and quick fixes leading to laziness…

    It’s not written in stone. I think the Catholics were also attempting to formulate some rules of thumb as well. Human beings need rules, some more than others. ((Jews)) more than anyone.

    If one views their actions and motives through the PIGGS WVELL test, it’s a good place to start.

    People can justify anything, but even the exercise itself forces one to stop and think about ethics and morality before they just mindlessly grab or intake what the Devil is offering.

  144. Mevashir says:
    @Caruthers

    Very perceptive comments. You have a deep understanding of Jewish and Christian cultures.

    When I was a yeshiva student in Jerusalem some thirty years ago, I heard a lecture by a prominent Orthodox Rabbi on Christian missionaries. He prefaced his talk by stating that Judaism in Europe flourished most greatly under the domination of the Catholic Church. He said that the Catholic Church granted the rabbis tremendous autonomy to govern their communities. He said that the ghettos were something the rabbis insisted on as much as the church. And he said that the enlightenment brought on by Napoleon led to the rapid demise of Orthodox Jewish culture and rabbinical control. (He also admitted that incidents of anti-Jewish violence on the part of European Christians were intermittent and greatly exaggerated by the Jewish community, and by and large the Catholic Church endeavored greatly to protect the Jews living in its territories.)

    I would assume that the Church deemed the rabbis the best possible enforcers of Jewish control and ceded to them that kind of authority with great willingness. I also have read in the book by Leonard Glick on Jewish-Christian relations in the Middle Ages, that one reason the church prohibited Christians from working as servants or maids for Jews is that they often would convert to Judaism to live more in solidarity with their employers’ families.

    The Hasidic movement Breslov of which I was part very much emphasizes individual responsibility and the judgment of the afterlife. It’s obsessed with sexual purity and other forms of high morality. Other Hassidic groups were notorious for operating brothels, selling drugs, and other such nefarious activities among Gentiles, but Breslov would never countenance such a thing. Breslov is probably the closest thing Judaism today has to a monastic community, with the exception that the Breslovers are expected to marry and have families.

    I also have read that the Essenes back in the time of Christ were approximately Jewish monastic communities. The three years I spent in yeshiva in an all-male environment were among the best years of my life. At the end of this time my rabbis told me I was expected to get married and raise a Jewish family to add to the Orthodox community. That presented new difficulties that eventually led to my disassociation from Orthodox Judaism. I once asked a rabbi why Judaism does not have monastic communities. He laughed and said those communities are automatically suspect of perversion because no normal male is able to control his sex drive and must get married as a way to sublimate it.

    This is part of a discussion I had with an Orthodox Rabbi in Jerusalem concerning celibacy in Christianity. You can see how he totally ridicules the concept, despite the Jewish teaching that Moses separated from his wife Tsipporah after the Sinai event and lived a celibate lifestyle for the last 40 years of his life:
    https://rchaimqoton.blogspot.com/2013/09/celibacy-and-catholic-church-part-2.html?m=1

    • Thanks: annamaria, Sarah
    • Replies: @simple mind
  145. Chris Moore says: • Website
    @Levtraro

    European and Asian commies are fairly inmune to Jewish infiltration while Anglos are extremely susceptible.

    Since when? You’ve already admitted the Bolsheviks were a ((Jewish)) inside job that resulted in Stalinism, and I’ve already linked to two articles documenting Chinese Communist infiltration by ((Jews)).

    Additionally, in my discussion with Mevshir, I’ve shown how the ((Jews)) lure defective personalities and leaders into their schemes, thus trapping their nations in the Devil’s paradigm.

    Example A: ((communism)). Putin may be trying to untangle his nation, but he can’t or won’t.

    Example B: The War on Terror and on “Islamofascism” instigated by the ((neocons/neolibs)) and their corrupt lickspittle. Trump may have been trying to untangle his nation, but couldn’t or wouldn’t, because he himself is so tangled up with ((Jews)).

    Your own communist rage at being tangled up with ((Jews)) has forced you into defective thinking and propagandised “logic,” which has been labeled “mass formation psychosis.”
    https://www.swfinstitute.org/news/90470/what-is-mass-formation-psychosis

    Either that, or you are a knowing formulator of mass formation psychosis.

    Mass formation psychosis is a ((Jewish)) specialty. They’ve been mastering that dark art for quite some time. That’s certainly how the ((Bolsheviks)) took control of Soviet Russia.

    You claim communism is immune to ((Jewish)) mass formation psychosis; I claim communism is mass formation psychosis. And so is capitalism.

  146. They can’t even leave poor little Romania alone. The Romanians only want to put more emphasis on math and science in their schools, and less emphasis on the holocaust ™

    https://christiansfortruth.com/jews-want-romanians-prosecuted-for-claiming-science-and-math-more-important-than-holocaust-to-learn-about-in-school/

    • Replies: @mulga mumblebrain
  147. @schnelladine

    The demands NEVER cease. That is a characteristic of Judeofascist thuggery-the goyim can NEVER grovel sufficiently to slake the Judaic xenophobia and hatred. We are all, more or less, Palestinians now-or will soon be.

  148. @Jon Chance

    The most practical and humane solution to Judaism is probably to neuter everyone who consistently behaves like a Jew and deport them to Birobidzhan

    What did Birobidzhan do to deserve that ?

    They belong in their OWN nation – with their OWN resources, government, money, policies and religion. But that country would NOT be someone else’s Palestine. And I certainly don’t want them near me (said the people of the world).

    Hence… the Jewish Question (101).

    If someone establishes a 501(c)3 nonprofit organization called United Against Judaism, will the IRS respect its tax-exempt status

    Try it and see. Let me know how that goes.

  149. @Bardon Kaldian

    My chief objection to Judaist religious culture is that is is, basically- boring. This is a religion without afterlife, I mean normative Judaism, not various heretics. And this is boring & dull

    Yes, indeed.

    When the deranged, hate-filled, murderous Dark Ages world of international Jewry is busily engaged in bringing about the complete and irreversible destruction of all human life (which they despise), by any and all means possible – including nuclear conflagration by a very deliberate, manufactured and final war with Russia – my main personal overall concern is always going to be the “boring-ness” of their ancient blood-soaked desert pig-god religion.

    Please leave. You are lowering the average IQ of this forum.

  150. @Anonymous

    Can’t live them and can’t live without them. What are we to do?

    Good question. They believe the easiest answer for everyone concerned is for us to die.

    But I’m smart. I can think of a better one.

  151. @Priss Factor

    Quite honestly, I don’t find that Jews are good at law, and neither is anyone else.

    Only WASPS understand law, and similar people

  152. @Mevashir

    Moses lived to be 120, which means he swore off the women from 80 onwards. This is hardly an example of “celibacy”, and he was married several times with broods of children, which is normal. The “monastic” part of Jewish history is called “Christian”

  153. @Jon Chance

    You think resting on the 7th weekday is “mental illness”? I think having opinions about other people is a sure sign of crazy, and you are clearly a religious nutjob. If I want to wear a black hat or grow my beard out, refuse pork and shellfish, then I’ll cut your balls off first and send you to hell. Ok Mr President? Can I have your vote too?

  154. Jon Chance says: • Website

    I’m not religious, but I think non-violent non-parasitic religions should be tolerated.

    Violent parasitic cults must not be tolerated.

    Please examine the Virginia Declaration of Rights (1776) by George Mason.

    Judaism is certainly not a non-violent non-parasitic religion.

    Judaism is a mental illness.

    Nobody cares what you eat.

    If you choose to be a Jew, perhaps you should learn why Judaism is the world’s foremost problem, and ask yourself why you choose to be a Jew.

    [MORE]

    The Cult of Judaism

    Judaism Studies:

    Thirty-Six Resources for Understanding the Modern World

    1 – Yuri Bezmenov – Psychological Warfare

    2 – Zbigniew Brzezinski – The Grand Chessboard

    3 – Robert Carroll – Fools’ Gold

    4 – Dwight Eisenhower – The Military-Industrial Complex

    5 – William Engdahl – A Century of War: Anglo-American Oil Politics & The New World Order

    6 – Henry Ford – The International Jew: The World’s Foremost Problem

    7 – Benjamin Freedman – The Third World War

    8 – Henry George – Progress & Poverty

    9 – Laurent Guyenot – From Yahweh to Zion

    10 – Anthony Hitchcock – The Synagogue of Satan

    11 – Norman Jewison – Fiddler on the Roof

    12 – John F. Kennedy – National Security & Secret Societies

    13 – Arthur Kestler – The Thirteenth Tribe

    14 – Leopold Kohr – The Breakdown of Nations

    15 – Martin Luther – On the Jews and Their Lies

    16 – Kevin MacDonald – Cultural Insurrections

    17 – Pauline Maier – Ratification

    18 – George Orwell – Animal Farm & 1984

    19 – Thomas Paine – Common Sense

    20 – Don Peretz – Oil & The Foundation of Imperial Interests in the Middle East

    21 – Michael Collins Piper – Final Judgement

    22 – Monty Python – The Life of Brian

    23 – Carroll Quigley – Tragedy & Hope

    24 – Alfred Rosenberg – Track of the Jew Through the Ages

    25 – Shlomo Sand – How I Stopped Being a Jew

    26 – Israel Shahak – Jewish History, Jewish Religion

    27 – Gary Sick – October Surprise

    28 – Aleksandre Solzhenitsyn – Two Hundred Years Together: The Crucifixion of Russia

    29 – Albert Speer – Inside the Third Reich

    30 – Bill Still – The Money Masters

    31 – Mark Twain – Letters from the Earth

    32 – Mikki Willis – Plandemic 2

    33 – Dennis Wise – The Greatest Story Never Told

    34 – Tim Wu – The Master Switch

    35 – Oded Yinon – The Zionist Plan for the Middle East

    36 – Stephen Zarlenga – The Lost Science of Money

  155. Derer says:

    US immigrants loyalty:

    a) “I am not Polak, I am a Jew”
    b) “I am not Russian, I am a Jew”
    c) “I am now loyal American first”

    Hmmm, One of these things is not like the others…hmmm, one of these things is not like the others…

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
$
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Spencer J. Quinn Comments via RSS
PastClassics
Becker update V1.3.2
The Surprising Elements of Talmudic Judaism
Analyzing the History of a Controversial Movement
The Shaping Event of Our Modern World
How America was neoconned into World War IV