“Gobsmacked” is a good English word that’s gaining ground in America, I’ve read. If it’s not familiar to you, it means “very surprised or otherwise affected,” like someone who has been unexpectedly smacked in the gob, or mouth. I’ve recently been gobsmacked not once but twice by a Scottish journalist called Stephen Daisley.
Corbyn’s a monster, Blair’s a mensch
My first gobsmacking from Daisley came when I read this article by him in the cuckservative Spectator:
A vote for Labour is a vote for anti-semitism
The Labour party (1900 – 2015) is dead. It died the day a majority of members, £3 and otherwise, voted to make their leader a man already plainly drenched in the moral sewage of anti-Semitism. The Labour party (2015 – ) is Corbyn’s party and if the famous centrists are working to preserve any party, it is that one. They might eventually salvage something out of it — Corbynism without Corbyn — but they will remain culpable for his actions until then.
Every vote for Labour is a vote for Corbyn. Every leaflet delivered is a two-fingered salute to British Jews. Every door knocked is a declaration: this is who I am and this is my tribe. You can campaign for Labour and vote for Labour without being an anti-Semite but in doing either you announce that you have reached an accommodation with anti-Semitism. Colluding in the organisation of politics against the Jews is worth it to get the railways renationalised.
The Labour party is going to fail the anti-Semitism test and the country might too. (A vote for Labour is a vote for anti-semitism, The Spectator, 29th October 2019)
As you can see, Daisley thinks that Jeremy Corbyn (often nicknamed Jezza) killed the Labour party by becoming its leader in 2015. Obviously, then, Daisley also thinks that Labour was alive and well under the leadership of Tony Blair. You remember Blair, don’t you? He’s the devious narcissist who lied the UK into a disastrous war in Iraq that killed huge numbers of innocent people and that directly led to the rise of the head-choppers and sex-slavers of Islamic State. Blair also nefariously opened Britain’s borders to migrants not just from Eastern Europe, who undercut the wages of Labour’s traditional supporters in the White working-class, but also from the Third World, who set about raping and sexually enslaving the daughters of those traditional Labour supporters.
Having left office after these crimes, Blair began piling up a vast fortune (now possibly well north of £100 million) as he was rewarded by the greedy and amoral globalists for whom he had worked so hard as prime minister. Jeremy Corbyn resolutely opposed Blair’s Iraq disaster and is not interested in money or material possessions. Yet it’s Corbyn, not Blair, who’s “drenched” in “moral sewage,” and it’s Corbyn, not Blair, who “killed” the Labour party – according to Stephen Daisley. And this brings me to the second gobsmacking I’ve received from Daisley. I looked for a photograph of him and found this:
I have never seen a more porcine and less trustworthy punim (which is Yiddish for “face”). And I doubt I ever will. Daisley looks as though he’s in training to play the role of the giant slug-like villain Jabba the Hutt in a remake of one of those old Star Wars movies. But I’m glad Daisley looks like that, because it means his punim is as repulsive as his ideology. I’m no fan of Jeremy Corbyn, believe me. But clearly he’s a far less immoral person than Tony Blair and has been responsible for far less evil in the world. Corbyn opposes war and the military-industrial complex. Blair supports war and has grown rich by working for the military-industrial complex.
Smirk Makes Free
But Blair’s crimes and immorality don’t matter to Daisley because he’s applying only one criterion: “Is it good for the Jews?” And Daisley used exactly that phrase in an article he wrote for the Jewish Chronicle in 2017: “If we apply the Bubbe Barometer — ‘Is it good for the Jews?’ — difficult to conclude that the outcome of the general election passes muster.” It’s easy to get the impression from the article that Daisley himself is Jewish – few goyim know that bubbe is Yiddish for “grandmother,” for example – but I can’t find any clear statement to that effect. One thing is sure: he behaves as though he’s Jewish, with an unfailing self-righteousness and insistence that Jewish interests must be at the centre of British politics.
That’s why Daisley hates Jeremy Corbyn and claims that “A vote for Labour is a vote for anti-semitism.” Corbyn’s leadership isn’t good for the Jews, whereas Blair’s leadership was very good for the Jews. The Israeli newspaper Haaretz said that Blair is “generally regarded as the most pro-Israel prime minister in British history.” Marie van der Zyl, head of the Jewish Board of Deputies, has recently “praised Mr Blair as a ‘true friend’ of the Jewish community.” In other words, Blair followed Jewish orders, so it didn’t matter that he was an enemy of Labour’s traditional supporters in the White working-class. Indeed, being a “true friend of the Jewish community” automatically entails being an enemy of the White British and their interests. And so Blair appointed the highly ethnocentric Jew Barbara Roche as his immigration minister and allowed her to flood Britain with tax-eating, crime-committing Third-Worlders. Jeremy Corbyn, of course, is also fully in favour of Third-World immigration, but that’s one of the paradoxes of Jewish Corbynophobia.
Jews attack Corbyn for endorsing and encouraging anti-Semitism, but the worst and most active anti-Semites are non-White Muslims, whose presence in Britain is both owed to and warmly supported by organized Jewry. Barbara Roche told the Guardian in 2001 that she “entered politics — she still emphasises this today — to combat anti-semitism and xenophobia in general.” In 2011, she viewed the Balkanization of London approvingly “over the rim of her cup of Americano coffee” and cooed to the Guardian that “I love the diversity of London. … I just feel comfortable.”
“One of the Jewish community’s greatest champions”
Do the ordinary Whites murdered, raped, robbed or driven from their homes by Roche’s Third-World allies feel “comfortable”? No, they don’t, but Roche doesn’t care about them. Their complaints are dismissed as racist or ignored altogether. Remember that, in Stephen Daisley’s porcine eyes, the Labour party was still alive and well when Labour councillors in Rotherham and many other places refused to help the White working-class girls being preyed on by Muslim rape-gangs.
Denis MacShane, the slug-like Labour MP for Rotherham, also refused to help. He was too busy working for the only people he really cared about: Jews in far-off London. After MacShane was jailed for fraud in 2013, the Jewish Chronicle saluted him as “one of [the Jewish community’s] greatest champions.” But MacShane wasn’t elected to champion Jews — he was elected to champion the White working-class. The clue is in the name of MacShane’s party. It’s called the Labour Party, not the Jewish Party or the Zionist Party. But the Jewish Chronicle has never criticized MacShane for betraying his White constituents in Rotherham. After all, what do they matter? It’s Jews who matter, as the Chronicle has once again emphasized under the headline “Are these antisemitism figures high enough for you, Mr Corbyn?” The article below runs thus:
Yet again, the six-monthly figures from the Community Security Trust [CST] show a record number of antisemitic incidents — and a further ten per cent rise in the number recorded between January and June of this year and the same period in 2018. In all but two months since April 2016 there have been more than a hundred recorded incidents — a level of antisemitic abuse and attack that was previously seen only when Israel was at war.
But the cause of this ongoing record increase in antisemitism is no mystery. It can be summed up in two words: Jeremy Corbyn. So we address this directly to the Labour leader: Are these figures high enough for you, Mr Corbyn?
Because, by any objective analysis of contemporary British antisemitism, Mr Corbyn must be seen as the instigator. Over the almost four years of his leadership, Mr Corbyn has refused to take any meaningful action against antisemitism in his party and has merely mouthed platitudes. …
More widely, Mr Corbyn has injected a poison into British politics and turbocharged the levels of open antisemitism in British society.
These CST figures are Jeremy Corbyn’s legacy. They are the legacy of the most dangerous racist in British politics — a man whose toxic views and behaviour pose a far greater threat to ethnic minorities than the National Front or the BNP ever managed. The figures should shame Mr Corbyn.
But, as the past four years have shown, he has no sense of shame. (Are these antisemitism figures high enough for you, Mr Corbyn?, The Jewish Chronicle, 2nd August 2019 / 1st Av 5779)
Myself, I’d say that it’s the Jewish Chronicle and the CST who have “no sense of shame.” Muslims are vastly over-represented among those responsible for “antisemitic abuse and attack.” And it is Jews who are both responsible for and warmly supportive of Muslim immigration. The very same Community Security Trust that is complaining about an increase in “antisemitism” is also helping the Muslim organization Tell MAMA (Measuring Anti-Muslim Attacks) to increase its political power and influence. The Jewish Chronicle reported in 2014 that “British Jewry’s leading communal security expert” will help the “Muslim group Tell MAMA tackle Islamophobia.” The “communal security expert” is called Richard Benson and he was the “chief executive” of the Community Security Trust for twelve years.
Jews have been “utterly betrayed”
In other words, Jews have created the problems that they are complaining so loudly about. Corbyn’s minority worship and Islamophilia are standard parts of Jewish ideology. The problem is that he neglects an even more important part of Jewish ideology: to obey Jews without question. And so Corbyn has been relentlessly attacked by Jews and their shabbos goyim. The cuckservative Spectator, which has just announced that “[I]t’s time to offer citizenship to illegal immigrants,” is now publishing a stream of Jeremiads (a real word meaning “a prolonged lamentation or complaint”) against Corbyn. As we’ve seen, Stephen Daisley thinks that Corbyn has killed Tony Blair’s good and decent Labour party. The Jewish journalist Karen Glaser has explained why “Jews are scared of a Corbyn government.” Among much else, Corbyn once defended a mural that promoted “the pernicious association between Jews and money,” which is, Glaser notes, “a deeply anti-Semitic trope that stretches back to medieval times.”
Another Jewish journalist, Tanya Gold, has written another Jeremiad under the headline: “‘Utterly betrayed’: Britain’s Jews are now politically homeless.” Gold says that “Most Jews [in Britain] now live in a state of existential fear” thanks to a Labour leader who hobnobs with Hamas and Hezbollah. Hamas is the anti-Semitic party that governs the Gaza Strip and Hezbollah is an anti-Semitic Shi’ite militia in Lebanon that’s closely allied with Israel’s great enemy Iran. But Iran, Lebanon and the Gaza Strip are a very long way from Britain. Hamas and Hezbollah have growing support and influence in Britain for only one reason: Muslim immigration.
And Jews like Tanya Gold — whose surname, you might think, promotes a “pernicious association between Jews and money” — have always warmly supported Muslim immigration. And can you guess who’s a warm supporter of Muslims and free-speech-hating Muslim organizations like Tell MAMA? Why it’s Stephen Daisley, who has told readers of the Spectator that “Banning Halal and Kosher slaughter would be un-British”:
When Rod Liddle quips about holding the General Election on a day when ‘Muslims are forbidden to do anything on pain of hell’, he is indulging in the downwards-punching satire of the powerless that so delights his legion [of] fans. He is kidding but ‘kidding on the square’, as the late, great Mose Allison would have put it. Middle age is the point where one begins to mistake acid reflux for everyman insight. British Muslims — subjected to more than 3,000 hate incidents last year — are tough enough to withstand blunt barbs of any Tesco Value Ann Coulter, but this yearning to exclude them from civil society speaks to an intolerance of religious and cultural difference. (Banning Halal and Kosher slaughter would be un-British, The Spectator, 1st November 2019)
How many “hate incidents” were British Whites subjected to last year at the hands of Muslims and other non-Whites? Stephen Daisley doesn’t care. Like Marie van der Zyl, Dennis MacShane, Karen Glaser and Tanya Gold, he cares only about the welfare of Jews.
Merk Makes Free
Jeremy Corbyn doesn’t care about the welfare of Whites either, but that isn’t why Jews hate him and are working so hard to prevent him from becoming the next prime minister. Unlike the hugely wealthy war criminal Tony Blair, Corbyn isn’t a “true friend of the Jewish community.” He doesn’t obey Jewish orders and he doesn’t make Jewish interests his first and only concern. That’s why he won’t be following Angela Merkel onto the podium at the World Jewish Congress:
World Jewish Congress President Ronald S. Lauder on 28 October honored Chancellor of the Federal Republic of Germany Angela Merkel with the 2019 WJC Theodor Herzl Award, which recognizes outstanding individuals who work to promote Herzl’s ideals for a safer, more tolerant world for the Jewish people. The award ceremony was held at the Jewish community center in Munich, co-hosted by President of the Jewish Community of Munich and Upper Bavaria & WJC Commissioner for Holocaust Memory Dr. Charlotte Knobloch.
Thanking WJC President Lauder, Chancellor Merkel expressed her heartfelt gratitude for the honor of being chosen as the recipient of this award, saying: “It is humbling for me that I, as a German chancellor, can receive the Theodor Herzl Award today. Jewish life in Germany must be supported – and protected.” (WJC honors German Chancellor Angela Merkel with 2019 WJC Theodor Herzl Award.
By opening Germany’s borders to more than a million Muslims and other non-Whites, Angela Merkel caused huge and lasting harm to the welfare of German Whites. Like Blair, Merkel is a traitor to her nation. And like Blair, Merkel proves again that being a “true friend of the Jewish community” automatically entails being an enemy of the Whites and their interests. If Jews truly cared about “anti-Semitism,” they would not welcome Muslim immigration and reward politicians like Blair and Merkel for massively increasing it.
The real killers of Labour
In fact, Jews benefit from anti-Semitism, because it allows them to play their favourite role of victim and to demand ever-tougher laws against the interests of the European Whites whom they see as their true enemies. That’s why Jews think the war-criminal Tony Blair is a “true friend.” Blair obeyed Jews and killed Arabs. It’s also why Jews are wailing in hysteria about the pacifist Jeremy Corbyn and the way he has “injected … poison into British politics.” Corbyn won’t obey Jews and won’t be killing any Arabs if he becomes prime minister.
Corbyn didn’t kill the Labour party either. As I described in “Working-Class Zero,” the Labour party was killed long ago, when it abandoned the White working-class and began to work against them instead. And who was responsible for that? It was Jews like Lord Goodman, Sir Samuel Fisher, and Rudy Sternberg, who funded and controlled the corrupt Labour prime minister Harold Wilson in the 1960s, and Jews like Anthony Lester and Jim Rose, who began the war on free speech that Jews like Pamela Geller are lamenting today (while censoring comments about Jews like Lester). As the old Polish saying goes: “The Jew cries out in pain as he strikes you.”