The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 Thomas Dalton Archive
Jasenovac: the Latest Holocaust Embarrassment
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information


Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

Funny how it goes with the Holocaust story: time and again, an ugly bit of truth slips out. When that happens, yet one more piece of the charade comes to light, for all to see. For a brief moment, one more embarrassing truth catches the public eye, only to quickly be cast into the depths of the memory hole. Only through diligence, hard work, and a bit of luck do such things come to assume a greater significance.

This time, sharp eyes caught the slip-up. The issue in question is an obscure World War II concentration camp in present-day Croatia, by the name of Jasenovac. The camp—which operated for around three and a half years, from mid-1941 until war’s end—is, by any reasonable accounting, all but irrelevant to the Holocaust story. Even according to the US Holocaust Memorial Museum, only some “12,000 to 20,000 Jews” died there, which means that the camp accounts for, at best, 0.33% of the presumed Jewish death toll of 6 million. Were it not for a recent blunder by the Jerusalem Post, I would likely never have spent a moment on the topic. In the grand Holocaust narrative, there are much larger fish to fry. But the latest gaff gives us a chance to shine a light on the on-going fraud that is the Holocaust. When the Jews themselves put a foot in their collective mouths, we should make the most of it.

The subject at hand is an article that briefly appeared on the Post website, titled “This disgraceful mocking of the Holocaust needs to stop now” (now available here; the original URL has been deleted). Written by an Australian journalist named David Goldman, the short essay obsesses over a three-year-old Croatian television interview in which historian and Croatian Jew Ivo Goldstein expounds on the “increasingly problematic” camp at Jasenovac. The interview, from 2018, included this question of Goldstein: “Many have commented on the lack of forensic evidence from this particular camp. Can you explain why this is the case?” (meaning, why there is an absence of evidence). Goldstein then dropped his “bombshell” reply: “Because in April 1945, Hitler flew in special machines to Jasenovac. These machines were used to dissolve the bones that were left.”

Several points here: One, in all of Holocaust historiography, there is no actual or even rumored documentation of any such “bone dissolving machines.” There were alleged bone crushers, driven by diesel engines; here is one alleged photo. But these have been shown to be fraudulent.[1]All alleged use of Nazi ’bone crushers’ to eliminate bodily evidence has been refuted in recent years. The machines in the few extant photos are likely conventional gravel ball mills used in road construction in the early 20th century. See the discussion in The Einsatzgruppen in the Occupied Eastern Territories (2018, C. Mattogno, Castle Hill Publishers), pp. 481-484. See also the online article “The bone mill of Lemberg” (2013). The Nazis also allegedly used chlorinated lime (quicklime) to try to decompose corpses at Treblinka and Belzec, but this chemical, when used, only reduces the odor; it does nothing to hasten decomposition. “Dissolving,” especially for bones, implies the use of acid or some other strong chemical process, but again, such claims are completely unknown in the literature. Hence Goldman rightly refers to these as “hitherto unheard-of machines.” Perhaps there was some confusion on Goldstein’s part, and he actually meant ‘crushing,’ not ‘dissolving.’ But again, we have no reliable evidence that such crushing machines were ever used by the Germans.

Two, this idea seems to be a pure invention by Goldstein to explain away a troublesome fact, namely, lack of forensic evidence at Jasenovac—meaning any corpses, ash, or other human remains. And by “pure invention,” I mean an outright lie. By all accounts, Goldstein lied to cover up a critical and damning fact. Anyone who has studied the Holocaust story knows that such lies are legion.[2]My all-time favorite Holocaust liar is Herman Rosenblat, who fabricated the whole “angel at the fence” story in the 1990s. His television interview in 2009, in which he openly confesses to the lie, is so audacious, so brazen, and so deluded that it stands as a monument to Jewish mendacity. The video is so instructive that it can’t be circulated enough.

Three, the whole premise that the Germans, in the final throes of defeat, would take the trouble to send anything like “bone dissolving machines” to an obscure camp in Croatia is patently absurd, as Goldman points out. The whole idea is nonsense.

Perhaps most significantly, this little episode brings to mind similar claims about the more important camps like Auschwitz, Treblinka, and Belzec. Lacking physical evidence, how can we justify claims of thousands, or hundreds of thousands, or a million Holocaust victims at these camps? For the journalist Goldman, however, the lies about Jasenovac only “contaminate” the larger Holocaust story, which he accepts unquestioningly. As he says, “Why allow the contamination of Holocaust history with a place [Jasenovac] that cannot provide any independent forensic evidence past a few thousand victims, and that has an ever-increasing—including in 2021—victim list that has been repeatedly proven to have been doctored?” Indeed; and we can ask the same question about virtually all of the conventional Holocaust sites. The implications are dire for Jews everywhere.

A Short Course on Jasenovac

It is worthwhile taking a moment to review the conventional history of this camp, given the many lessons it offers here. It is undisputed that Jasenovac was established under the auspices of the Nazi-aligned government of occupied Croatia known as the Ustasa (or Ustase, or Ustashi). The camp was constructed in August 1941, not long after Hitler began his invasion of the Soviet Union. It consisted of five separate facilities, two of which were short-lived, but the other three—Ciglana, Kozara, and Stara Gradiska—operated right until the virtual end of the war in April 1945. The purpose of the camp is disputed; some claim it was strictly a detention and work camp, whereas others declare it to be an extermination center on par with the worst camps of Poland. By all accounts, several thousand people died there—mostly Serbs, but also Jews, Roma, and scattered numbers of Muslims and Croatian political enemies.

The numbers of victims, and especially the numbers of Jews, are the main points of contention. Like most Holocaust camps and death sites, the range of estimates is vast. Individuals sympathetic to the Ustasa regime, like former president Franjo Tudjman, regularly gave figures of just 3,000 to 4,000 total. Such numbers date back to the first forensic examinations of the camp in 1947. But by the 1970s and 1980s, the numbers were rising; the 1990 Encyclopedia of the Holocaust (p. 189) claimed, without evidence, that around 300,000 bodies were discovered and exhumed there.

Yet even this number was insufficient for our Holocaust propagandists. One recent article notes that, over past decades, “historians have estimated that between 700,000 and 1,000,000 people were killed at Jasenovac.” Serbian publications of the 1990s cited figures as high as 1.2 million.[3]Benčić, A. (2018). “Koncentracijski logor Jasenovac: konfliktno ratno nasljeđe i osporavani muzejski postav.” Polemos XXI (41): 37–63. Of these, around 15% are claimed to have been Jews—meaning, potentially 100,000 to 150,000. At that upper estimate, this would put Jasenovac well ahead of Majdanek in terms of Jewish death toll, and approaching the status of a Sobibor. If, on the other hand, Jews were 15% of, say, 3,000 fatalities, it would mean an utterly inconsequential 400 or 500 deaths. Much is at stake.

Today, though, the more commonly accepted estimates are much closer to the low end than the high. The current Croatian government seems to accept a figure of 83,000 total deaths. The US Holocaust Memorial Museum claims that “the Ustasa regime murdered between 77,000 and 99,000 people in Jasenovac between 1941 and 1945.” Of these, some 12,000 to 20,000 are claimed to have been Jews. Still, the USHMM is not very sanguine about their own estimates:

Determining the number of victims for…Jasenovac is highly problematic, due to the destruction of many relevant documents, the long-term inaccessibility to independent scholars of those documents that survived, and the ideological agendas of postwar partisan scholarship and journalism, which has been and remains influenced by ethnic tension, religious prejudice, and ideological conflict. The estimates offered here are based on the work of several historians who have used census records as well as whatever documentation was available in German, Croat, and other archives in the former Yugoslavia and elsewhere.

As I noted above, even 20,000 Jewish deaths are largely irrelevant to the broader Holocaust narrative.

A Rebuttal

Goldman’s short essay drew a quick and furious response from Dejan Ristic, the acting director of the Serbian Museum of Genocide Victims. It was published in the Jerusalem Post just two days after Goldman’s original piece. Serbia, of course, has an incentive to promote high numbers of victims, and especially high numbers of Serbs, because it enhances their victimhood status and promotes their nationalist agenda. But more important than high numbers is the overall integrity of the camp as a legitimate Holocaust site and not as a whimsical political ragdoll that has victim numbers ranging over nearly three orders of magnitude, and that is entirely lacking in relevant evidence.

Ristic’s rebuttal—“Shame on those who seek to revise history of the Holocaust”—is as poorly argued as it is poorly written. (Though, oddly, the Post website still displays this rebuttal, whereas the original essay is long gone.) Ristic expresses “astonishment” at the “pseudo-scientific and revisionist text” by Goldman, which contains, he says, little more than “a series of inaccurate statements and semi-information.” Ristic is incensed that Goldman dares to cite the ragged history of victim numbers; the Museum clearly accepts a figure in the mainstream range (80,000 to 90,000), though with the opportunity for higher figures in the future. Ristic writes, “As the research of the experts of the Museum…continues, it is to be expected that the number of Jasenovac victims will be corrected. … The estimated total number of victims is, unfortunately, far higher than the one that historical science will ever be able to identify with the precise data.” He is anxious to quell all thoughts of a mere few thousand deaths, and he equally seeks to avoid any suggestion that the figure approaches a million or more; as he well knows, both extremes threaten to undermine all credibility about the camp.

Most amusingly, in his entire lengthy rebuttal, Ristic never once mentions the “bombshell” about the bone-dissolving machines—not once. This is a tacit admission that the point holds, that no evidence was sought or found, and that the whole basis for Jasenovac as a top-tier death camp rests on little more than rumor and innuendo, if not outright falsehood.

The central problem for both Ristic and Goldman, however, is that their back-and-forth arguments promise to expose the far more consequential problems of the main Holocaust camps. In fact, Ristic does the nasty work for us. He writes, “we could ask a question as to whether it is possible to deny, in the same way, the number of 1,200,000 to 1,500,000 killed in Auschwitz since there is no forensic evidence for that claim either?” Touché, Mr. Ristic! The irony is that he is entirely correct, of course. No evidence (or scarcely any) for Auschwitz; none for Treblinka; none for Belzec—the same old story.

Grave Implications

Goldman’s main beef is with the ad hoc lie of the bone-dissolving machines, but this echoes the many, far more grievous lies about Auschwitz, Belzec, Treblinka, and indeed all six of the so-called death camps.[4]Such lies are vast, both in content and type. They cover all aspects of the Holocaust, and include overt lies, lies of omission, half-truths, dissembling, gross exaggeration, hyperbole, and many more. They were promoted by survivors, “eyewitnesses,” coerced and captive Germans, and present-day “experts.” I can’t begin to elaborate these here; they are the subject of several dedicated books. For starters, one might refer to Auschwitz Lies (G. Rudolf and C. Mattogno, 2017, Castle Hill), Treblinka (C. Mattogno and J. Graf, 2020, Castle Hill), or Belzec (C. Mattogno, 2016, Castle Hill). Or for a good overview of these issues, see my own work Debating the Holocaust (2020, Castle Hill). Of these, Goldman of course is silent. But he does decry the ongoing process of myth-formation surrounding a camp like Jasenovac, “where myths of Serbian and Jewish suffering were interwoven, providing a new series of national myths” (to cite the author David McDonald). Goldman, though, naturally avoids the similar but far greater myth-formation process about Auschwitz, the other camps, and the broader Holocaust. It is this very myth-formation process that has led to numbers like 1 million Jews gassed at Auschwitz, when, on the far more plausible revisionist thesis, perhaps 150,000 Jews died there—and none in gas chambers.

Likewise, Goldman ridicules the notion of human remains “yet to be discovered” at Jasenovac, and he rightly jabs a finger at the Yugoslav government, which, “during its 47-year rule of the site, never bothered once to try and locate these mysterious ‘missing’ remains.” The same, of course, can be said for the current Croatian government and its on-going 30-year rule. (One strongly suspects that there are simply no remains to be found there.) But this again raises the same question for the other camps: Where are the remains of anything approaching 1 million Jewish bodies at Auschwitz? Or 900,000 Jewish bodies at Treblinka? Or 600,000 Jewish bodies at Belzec? Do we have anything? Bodies, bones, ash—anything? Do we even have the holes in the ground where the Germans were said to bury the hundreds of thousands of victims, only to later dig them up and burn them “to ash” on open-air fires over wooden logs? Based on my years of research, the answer to all these questions is ‘no.’

What about the alleged 1 million Jews killed in the various ghettos? Where are their remains? What about the alleged 1.6 million Jews killed by shootings, mostly along the Eastern front; where are their remains? (Such figures are stated or implied by all of our experts, and are absolutely required to get us to the mandatory “6 million” total.) Not all of their remains, mind you, or even most of them. We would be satisfied with, say, half, or even a quarter, as long as we had a good explanation for the remainder. But instead we get stories of “600 bodies found here” and “250 bodies found there” and ashes consistent with perhaps “a few thousand bodies” at most. These are so far short of the “6 million” that they constitute an effective refutation of that very figure. Just as the “700,000 to 1 million” at Jasenovac is a farce, so too is the “6 million Jews” for the broader Holocaust.[5]This is not to deny that many thousands of Jews did die during the National Socialist era. By most revisionist accounts, perhaps 500,000 in total died, from all causes. But this is more than a 90% reduction from the claimed 6 million. And it reduces Jewish deaths to a mere footnote in the larger catastrophe that was World War II.

And yet, our intrepid reporter David Goldman has the gall to write, “Those who have conflated the only [!] wartime concentration camp without any verifiable data, with scientifically proven [!] Holocaust facts, have done immeasurable harm to Jewish history.” He is either ignorant of the truth or deliberately covering up the reality. The true “immeasurable harm” has been done by his fellow Jews and their intellectual lackeys who, for decades, have promoted an unsustainable myth of Jewish suffering.

The days of the “6 million” are numbered, and I suspect that Goldman, Goldstein, and friends know it. When that crumbles, so too collapses what little remains of Jewish credibility. When the orthodox Holocaust story goes down, the dominoes may well begin to fall. And when that happens, all bets are off.

Thomas Dalton, PhD, has authored or edited several books and articles on politics, history, and religion, with a special focus on National Socialism. His works include a new translation series of Mein Kampf, and the books Eternal Strangers (2020), The Jewish Hand in the World Wars (2019), and Debating the Holocaust (4th ed, 2020). Most recently he has edited a new edition of Rosenberg’s classic Myth of the 20th Century and a new book of political cartoons, Pan-Judah!. All these works are available at For all his writings, see his personal website


[1] All alleged use of Nazi ’bone crushers’ to eliminate bodily evidence has been refuted in recent years. The machines in the few extant photos are likely conventional gravel ball mills used in road construction in the early 20th century. See the discussion in The Einsatzgruppen in the Occupied Eastern Territories (2018, C. Mattogno, Castle Hill Publishers), pp. 481-484. See also the online article “The bone mill of Lemberg” (2013).

[2] My all-time favorite Holocaust liar is Herman Rosenblat, who fabricated the whole “angel at the fence” story in the 1990s. His television interview in 2009, in which he openly confesses to the lie, is so audacious, so brazen, and so deluded that it stands as a monument to Jewish mendacity. The video is so instructive that it can’t be circulated enough.

[3] Benčić, A. (2018). “Koncentracijski logor Jasenovac: konfliktno ratno nasljeđe i osporavani muzejski postav.” Polemos XXI (41): 37–63.

[4] Such lies are vast, both in content and type. They cover all aspects of the Holocaust, and include overt lies, lies of omission, half-truths, dissembling, gross exaggeration, hyperbole, and many more. They were promoted by survivors, “eyewitnesses,” coerced and captive Germans, and present-day “experts.” I can’t begin to elaborate these here; they are the subject of several dedicated books. For starters, one might refer to Auschwitz Lies (G. Rudolf and C. Mattogno, 2017, Castle Hill), Treblinka (C. Mattogno and J. Graf, 2020, Castle Hill), or Belzec (C. Mattogno, 2016, Castle Hill). Or for a good overview of these issues, see my own work Debating the Holocaust (2020, Castle Hill).

[5] This is not to deny that many thousands of Jews did die during the National Socialist era. By most revisionist accounts, perhaps 500,000 in total died, from all causes. But this is more than a 90% reduction from the claimed 6 million. And it reduces Jewish deaths to a mere footnote in the larger catastrophe that was World War II.

(Republished from The Occidental Observer by permission of author or representative)
• Category: History • Tags: Holocaust, Jews, World War II 
Hide 27 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. anarchyst says:

    One cannot counter the holohoax head-on.
    Doing so is not only too abrupt, but prevents people from thinking “outside the box” and (mistakenly) “offends their sensibilities” or “disrespects the dead”.
    Most people think that “it must be true” as “the big lie” has been disseminated and “set in stone” for the last seventy-years or so.
    The way to promote TRUTH about the holohoax is to use an oblique approach.
    Rather than stating that the holocaust™ is a hoax of massive proportion, possibly the greatest hoax in modern history, exposing peripheral claims is the way to go.
    Flyers exposing the holocaust™ con directly go nowhere because most people will not take them seriously or take the time to do the research themselves.
    Posting flyers with photos of Ursula Haverbeck, Monika Schaefer, Sylvia Stolz, and Ernst Zundel with the simple caption “Why were these elderly people imprisoned?” along with a website URL will pique the interest of almost everybody. The “hook” is then set. Pass these flyers out in front of the various jewish “freak shows” called holocaust™ museums.
    Another tactic to use is to expose the types of “death machines” that are claimed to have been used by “thenaziswhowanttokillsixmillionjews”. From “lampshades, soap, and shrunken heads (oh my)” to “jewish blood spurting out of the ground for weeks and months” to the “masturbation machines” and “electric floors”, all of these false, preposterous claims are easily debunked.
    A good method to use on those who are engineering and scientific types is to use basic scientific principles to bolster the impossibility of “gas chambers” without ventilation systems or “gas-tight doors” (that swing the wrong way making retrieval of the bodies impossible), to the “size” of the “gas chambers” which will demolish claims as to the quantity of people “gassed” at one time.
    Not only “gas chambers”, but crematoria which are designed to burn cleanly and emit no flames. Claims that flames shot out of the smokestacks are demonstrably false, as well as the claims that multiple bodies could be cremated in one “muffle” in 15 minutes without downtime for maintenance.
    Germans were and still are excellent engineers, but still cannot refute the laws of physics.
    The key is the use the holocaust™ promoters own absurdities and false claims against them.
    We can win this one. The TRUTH must prevail.

    • Thanks: Ann Nonny Mouse
  2. Thanks for a very informative article. Jasenovac encapsulates the Holohoax in microcosm. You have called it a myth. It is better described as a fable – a fictitious narrative or story. Admittedly, there are some truthful elements or details, but all completely subsumed in a fictitious narrative.

  3. @anarchyst

    When you have people that believe in religion as something real and important in their lives, you must realize that you are dealing with people that haven’t the necessary intellect to understand anything scientific that is in contrast to their belief system.

    The majority of the world’s population has been propagandized to believe in nonsense such as religion and the need for government. They are programmed to want to be lied to and hence bold stories are eagerly consumed as undeniable fact.

    • LOL: Rosie
  4. smiddy012 says:

    Maybe once we swallow this pill we can move on to the realization that Hitler was a crypto-Rothschild/British agent. Because nothing is more pathetic than white nationalists worshipping a crypto as if he were their martyred Messiah…

    Reminds me how the KKK was started by a freemason and that their bible was called The Kloran… Ethnocentric-first movements are particularly easy to Trojan Horse or create as controlled opposition from the start…

    Actually, understanding that Hitler was, in all likelihood, a crypto-Rothschild, ain’t even the hardest pill… The hardest pill for righties to swallow concerning WW2 is that the only major leader (of the big 4) who wasn’t completely controlled was Stalin…

    • Replies: @Tsigantes
  5. No such thing as a bone dissolving machine? On the contrary. The media has been “dissolving” the truth before our eyes for generations. The highlight being that the Nazis were never at the levers.

  6. ArthurK says:

    “Three, the whole premise that the Germans, in the final throes of defeat, would take the trouble to send anything like “bone dissolving machines” to an obscure camp in Croatia is patently absurd, as Goldman points out. The whole idea is nonsense.”

    Yes, very unlike the meritworthy pleas for me to send just \$19/month so that elderly Holocaust victims in the former Soviet Union won’t starve. After all, they have no one to count on but me.

    • Replies: @Charles
  7. Anon[397] • Disclaimer says:

    Better to focus on cracking wide-open 9/11 first and to press for full accountability. The Hollowhoax will tumble far more easily in its wake.

  8. There is one commonality between 9/11 and the 6 million.

    Jews have been prepping for major Wars for Israel. They needed something like 9/11, and by golly, it happened totally according to plan.

    Also, since at least World War I, Jews have been saying 6 million Jews were being killed here, there, everywhere. Anywhere there was some crisis involving Jews, 6 million Jews were threatened or killed.

    And then, WWII happened, and by golly, exactly 6 million Jews were said to have been killed.

    Are Jews super-lucky in their prognostications or what?

  9. Tsigantes says:

    Exactly my conclusion too, thank you for writing this! Indeed, it should be obvious.

    It is the only explanation for the flagrant anomalies of both the Anglo-American narrative and the revisionists’ Hitler-as-Saint & Saviour narrative, neither of which look beyond their own Great Power “history”.

    Why would Hitler admire and illogically seek to avoid war with Britain, the country that promulgated WW1, fingered Germany for the blame and was largely responsible for the Versaille Treaty that eventually plunged interwar Germany into hyperinflation and reparation poverty? Revisionists claim that this is because the British are in fact really fellow Germans (!), which blithely ignores the Norman invasion, Celts, the indigenous Brits and other admixtures. (Do they really believe that the UK was empty until “Germans” filled it up?) Why would Hitler admire the country that dissolved the Austro-Hungarian empire – and 3 others –
    home of half the German speaking people, with whom Hitler sought union? Created the Palestine Mandate for his purportedly hated jews? Since Hitler supposedly embarked on his political career because of WW1 why would this particular outstanding enemy be so exceptionally excluded from his animus, from blame?


    It also explains 1) the 10+ times Germany sued for peace with Britain – a grotesque historical anomaly which revisionists treat as a sign of German peacefulness [overlooking the war] and apparently assume to be normal : yet countries and fighting forces throughout history have never sued more than once, and rarely twice, for what should be self-evident reasons. It further explains the mystery of Rudolf Hess [highly educated purported author of Mein Kampf) and why he was held – uniquely and utterly absurdly – in cruel solitary confinement for the remaining decades of his life right up until his questionable death. If the Anglo-American narrative was true -which it isn’t – Hess, many times more than Speer, should have been endlessly deposed by the military, by governments and by historians and, like Speer, given a platform. We can also wonder why Hess and Speer were not executed. These factors alone point to conspiracy emanating from powerful elements of the British i.e. Anglo-American oligarchy pre-war and engineered placement of German ‘leaders’ – and subsequent betrayal by that oligarchy. The same oligarchy that the unelected Churchill was beholden to and whose orders he apparently fulfilled.

    Ditto for the absurd anomaly of Hitler’s hated Weimar Republic’s Central Banker Helmut Schacht (best friend and possible homosexual partner of Montagu Norman – many times head of the Bank of England, responsible for its transformation and for the creation of the BiS – with Germany as its first member) being :
    (1) appointed by Hitler and (2) sudden reversal of Schacht’s career course by turning into a national currency issuer. In fact this was the only way to pay for German re-armament and war infrastructure i.e. armaments, autobahns, reinforced and enlarged bridges, air strips etc. Hitler’s much vaunted Economic Miracle was in fact entirely focussed on war preparation, including the workers housing [siedlungen] needed near the new and enlarged industrial plants. Consider also the enormous American corporate investment into Germany’s war preparation after 1933.

    [Revisionists naively claim that Hitler invented national currency issuance, seemingly unaware that before the invention of Central Banks – by England! – all countries issued their own currency.]

    There are an infinite number of contemporaneous anomalies but stepping back from these details to view the entire post-war history up to the present, consider this: why would Hitler concentrate on carrying out Britain and Anglo-America’s ultimate and longstanding war aim of destroying and looting Russia – which is still in play 75 years later -and how did Anglo-America obfuscate their support for this? Military analysis of the Allies war in Europe provides much of the answer.

    Meanwhile, simple comprehension of the vastness of 11 time zone Russia, and USSR history, makes obvious that, then as no!, not only did Russia / USSR NOT need even more territory but that Stalin, – who had sent the Anglo-American agent Trotsky packing – (1) won his place as leader on the basis of ‘communism in one country]’ i.e. rebuilding and reinventing Russia on a communist model and (2) spent most of the interwar years struggling to achieve this aim. Stalin’s entire career was focussed on modernising the USSR (and eliminating its internal enemies). The last thing that he and the USSR needed was yet another war to further decimate the population and destroy what had been so painfully achieved to date. To prevent this USSR diplomats spent 5 fruitless interwar years being refused alliance by the western European Great Powers, to settle in desperation on the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact. These simple facts, attested to by every European archive, has been replaced by not only the revisionists’ claim of USSR warmongering – thus positioning Hitler as a mere “defender” [not only of Germany but, super-heroically, of the whole of Europe] – but in the present day the Anglo-American run EU’s 2020 declaration that the USSR was “co-responsible for WW2.”

    The Anglo-American oligarchy has waged an almost 200 year war against Russia on every conceivable front: this has not ceased but only increases in strength. Apart from MacKinder’s World Island theory (now dismissed as redundant but in fact self evident) this is due principally to Russia’s unimaginable resource wealth. We can remember the brief reign of the ‘Harvard Boys’….

    The entire post war ‘free world’ Narrative should raise eyebrows and questions about not only Hitler, the Nazis and WW2’s true European theatre’s war aims, but the sudden announcement of the Iron Curtain and Cold War, the pretence that Anglo-America defeated Hitler and won the war, the decision to position former enemy Germany as the leading industrial and political power in Europe and to be the deciding power in the CIA-formed EU, the mass importation of nazis to the US and appointment to leading positions inside the US, Europe and internationally, the downgrading of their actual WW2 allies in favour of ‘enemy’ Germany…..NONE of these decisions make sense even inside this fairy tale. And yet it persists, and even has its own recent, internal, Hitler-repositioning revisionists.

    And we should ask: is it merely coincidence that Hitler’s socialist (and fascist: combined corporate + government rule) is being defended and ‘revised’ today? In light of today’s censorship, racialism, euthanisation of the unproductive, preparations for war, evident government lies, de-sovereigned one worldism?

    • Thanks: Ann Nonny Mouse
    • Replies: @Rufus clyde
  10. Charles says:

    That International Fellowship of Christians and Jews infomercial – we must be referring to the same one – runs, as best I can tell, 24/7/365 on various cable channels.

    • Replies: @anarchyst
  11. The Big Lie is now a foundational pillar of the West. Millions of school children have been marched through the Holohoax remembrance centers to receive their indoctrination, and many tons of cement have been poured to create grand memorials to a falsehood.

    Propaganda movies and oceans of printer’s ink have reinforced the myth and dug the hole deeper.

    The big denouement is coming. All will be revealed. The Chinese-Russian Asian alliance will not allow the Big Lie to dominate their future. The rising East will flatly reject Holohoax mythology, and it will crumble in the West.

  12. anarchyst says:

    If Christians KNEW what jews REALLY thought of them, donations and funding for the International Fellowship of Christians and jews would dry up.
    Many of today’s Christians are “useful idiots” kowtowing to the jews and are too stupid to realize that ((they)) are being used.
    Harsh criticism?? YES, but true…

    • Agree: Ann Nonny Mouse
  13. Being a Croat who, as a kid, visited Jasenovac with school, and have later read not few books about the subject, I’ll just add a few points:

    * Tuđman thought that in Jasenovac CC died perhaps 40,000 people (malnutrition, typhoid, killing,…), not 4,000

    * bone cruncher is Goldstein’s fabrication; basically, he’s nuts. He cannot keep a civil discourse on the topic

    * how many people died there? I don’t know. There were no furnaces; nothing similar to some imaginary bone cruncher. It is true that some people were killed & thrown in the nearby river, but it couldn’t be a great number. I guess most of them were Gypsies who had been dispatched immediately.

    * one should not overlook one basic fact: the entire documentation on the camp had been transferred to Belgrade in 1945- and there was no serious attempt to analyze it dispassionately. So, ginormous figures are simply a fabrication.

    * yet, not a few people were really killed & died there. How many? I don’t know, but I’d say somewhere from 4,000 to max 30,000. Maybe less, maybe more. Be as it may, because the current Croatian government is basically a refurbished Yugoslav “deep state”- they don’t want to excavate the place to see what actually is there.

    * there are many Croats of Jewish ancestry who are vocal in their opinion that the whole number of Jews exterminated during the 1941-1945 period is overblown. It is true that NDH had “racial laws” for Jews and Gypsies; it is true that many local Jews were killed in various camps or extradited to Nazis; but it seems that figures are too big. Officially, I think that for Jews, the number of those who lost their lives in NDH is ca. 60,000. More realistic, it could be much lower. How much- I don’t know.

    Serbs could comprise most of the victims, perhaps 50-60%, Jews I don’t know, while about Gypsies I am clueless. The only two people who were killed there I know of were ancestors of my friends, Croatian Communists.

    • Agree: Derer
    • Thanks: Ann Nonny Mouse
  14. Vanunu says:

    I always wondered what was used for fuel to cremate 6 million bodies

  15. the story of little red riding hood was better and more credible

  16. John_H says:

    I have visited Holocaust museums in the United States, Denmark, Germany, Hungary, and a resistance museum in Poland. I have visited Auschwitz and Birkenau Camps with their displays of the Holocaust horrors. I found that all of those experiences raised more questions than they answered about the existence of these camps for the singular purpose of death. The Holocaust propaganda machine of today would make Joseph Goebbels green with envy.

    • Agree: Derer
  17. anon[335] • Disclaimer says:

    the following factual points about the phoniness of the holocaust story is very convincing:

  18. anon[335] • Disclaimer says:

    when the jewish holocaust lie becomes common knowledge the jews will be stripped naked of their identity since the holocaust is the foundation of modern jewry identity. When that happens there will be no other identity of jews except the identitly that Hitler gave the Jews. Times are getting interesting.

  19. DanD says:

    This is one of the primary causes of the “Great Reset.” Zionism is not only NOT Judaism, it is anti-Jewish. In the end, Zionism will destroy the Jewish identity as anything that anyone would want to experience, because nobody wants to be an adherent of Satan’s agenda … and that’s how most Judeo-Christianites would ultimately perceive the current prevailing victory of any Zionist agenda.

    Anglican doctrine is a product of Zionist conquest.

    • Replies: @Ann Nonny Mouse
  20. Where are the remains of the 666,666,666,666,666,666+ White Christians killed by the Jews?

  21. Where are the remains of anything approaching 1 million Jewish bodies at Auschwitz? Or 900,000 Jewish bodies at Treblinka? Or 600,000 Jewish bodies at Belzec? Do we have anything? Bodies, bones, ash—anything?

    yes. the ash is in the ground.

    Based on my years of research, the answer to all these questions is ‘no.’

    your “years of research” is irrelevant. go dig.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  22. @Tsigantes

    The Anglo-US narrative of the Twentieth Century is absurd on it’s face. The management of the German-Polish conflict by the British is simply not part of the fairy tale spun for the people. Great Britain ran around the Mediterranean and pretended that the bizarre German aerial assault of 1940 somehow constituted a threat to the Empire. Germany constituted a legitimate alternative to the pre-1914 British and American economic orders. The same imperatives that drove the European wars after 1680 were the same in 1914, 1939, 1947 and 1999.

  23. @DanD

    You remind me of Miko Peled’s 2021/03/17 article here at UR, The Anti-Semitic Birth of the Zionist State: A History of Israel’s Self-Hating Founders.

    Yes, since the 19th Century or earlier there have been screams that six million Jews were about to be killed.

    But I infer from that Miko Peled article that the Zionists (aka Maccabeans) were determined to force Hitler to kill six million assimilated Jews for the wonderful justification of the creation of a Jewish state that that would bring.

    They didn’t succeed in that hope, and singling out the small proportion of Jews among those who died in the concentration camps is nasty, not being given special privileges makes them victims, of course.

    But ever since, they have been shouting success, that wonderful victimization of Jews really happened, when it didn’t, but that endless Holocaust shouting has worked so far.

    Miko Peled doesn’t exactly say that. My inference.

  24. @anarchyst

    Why were these elderly people imprisoned?

    Because they weren’t imprisoned when they were youngerly people.

    • Troll: anarchyst
  25. anarchyst says:

    This post deserves to be an article on ts own…apologies for the long read…

    If “the holocaust” is thoroughly documented, why do all the documents show that it never happened?

    All of the German camp documents were stored at Bad Aralson since the end of the war. The Red Cross/ITS was the agency charged with controlling these records at Bad Aralson.

    In 1985, 40 years after the war, Dr Charles Beiderman was the head of the Red Cross/ITS, Beiderman was called to testify at the Zundel trial for the prosecution. Beiderman testified that QUOTE as of December 31, 1983, the total number of deaths registered with the Special Registry Office and various other registry offices was 373,468.

    There is NOT ONE DOCUMENT outlining any extermination plan for jews or others. In fact, prominent Zionists collaborated with the German government and formulated plans at the highest level of the German government for the transfer of jews to what was then known as Palestine. Absolutely nothing was noted or recorded about extermination.

    Official International Red Cross figures for all camp deaths total around 731,000-NOT 6 million. In fact, population totals pre-WW2 and post-WW2 show an INCREASE in the jewish population in post-WW2 Europe immediately after the cessation of the war.


    If a country were hell-bent on genocide, WHY WOULD IT KEEP RECORDS??

    WHY would it build camps hundreds (if not thousands) of miles away with sanitary facilities, housing, medical, recreational and other ancillary facilities? Would it not have been easier to just “eliminate” them without going through all of this trouble? Why would they expend massive effort on logistical movement utilizing their limited energy resources if the goal was extermination?

    Things do not add up.

    Something BIG stinks in this whole jewish holocaust deal. It is no secret that jewish Zionists made deals with the German government in order to make life uncomfortable for jewish Germans.

    In fact, it was jewish Zionist leaders who first proposed that all jews wear the yellow Star of David armband so that they could be easily identified. Most German jews considered themselves Germans first and had no desire to emigrate.

    The establishment of a homeland along with the 6,000,000 figure was a Zionist dream since the 1800s. Many periodicals of the day starting with the 1800s touted the “six-million” figure.

    What better way to encourage emigration to a foreign land than to make things difficult for the cream of German society (jews)?? The TRUTH about the so-called jewish holocaust is out . . .

    As cremation of ONE human body takes hours, the amount of time claimed by holocaust promoters is a physical, scientific and statistical impossibility. Their claims also do not account for the “downtime” that crematoria require for maintenance, etc.

    In addition, there are no mass burial sites that are commensurate with the claims of “six-million” or even “one-million”. There is also a jewish prohibition on excavation of claimed possible burial sites. WHY?? Because THEY DO NOT EXIST.

    There is even a prohibition on the use of ground penetrating radar to search for burial sites. WHY?? If millions were gassed and cremated, the activities would have lasted well into the 1950s.

    The so-called jewish holocaust has been turned into a de-facto religion in which no deviation from orthodoxy is permitted. In fact, in most European countries, independent investigation into jewish holocaust truths is strictly forbidden under pain of fines and imprisonment. In the USA, things are not quite as bad, only job loss and personal and professional destruction at the hands of those of the tribe that FEAR the real truth of the jewish holocaust being exposed is evident.

    A questionable dishonest judicial “trick” used in holocaust trials is that of “judicial notice” in which TRUTH CANNOT BE USED AS A DEFENSE OR ENTERED INTO EVIDENCE IN THE KANGAROO COURTS THAT PROSECUTE THOSE WHO DARE TO INVESTIGATE THIS HISTORICAL EVENT. Judicial notice, once invoked against a defendant, disallows the introduction of evidence that does not conform to “commonly accepted beliefs” about the “holocaust”, EVEN IF THE EVIDENCE EXPOSES THE HOLOCAUST LIES AND FABRICATIONS THAT CAN EASILY BE DEBUNKED. A question for you holocaust promoters-why are there laws that criminalize the search for truth?? What are you afraid of??

    When the truth about this historical event comes out, it will change much of the world’s perception about those that are using this event as a cash cow that keeps on giving. . . “there’s NO business like SHOAH business”. Zionist complicity in this event is carefully covered up.

    A good example of present-day censorship is the fate that awaits those that dare question official jewish holocaust orthodoxy. Most European countries have criminalized ANY line of thought that deviates from the official jewish holocaust story. WHY?? In fact, TRUTH is no defense when it comes to all things holocaust. Ask noted WW2 researcher David Irving, who was forced to recant TRUTH in order to avoid punishment.

    The latest victims of holocaustianity are Ursula Haverbeck, Monika Schaefer and Sylvia Stolz, who are elderly grandmothers who have been prosecuted and sentenced to maximum-security prisons in Germany for incorrect thoughts.

    If people only knew of the planning that took place (among those of the chosen) to engineer the jewish holocaust, there would be a pogrom of massive size. You see, the jewish holocaust was necessary in order to force the establishment of a jewish state.

    In this case, the ENDS justified the MEANS. There have been many real holocausts of much greater misery throughout human history, yet the jewish holocaust is the only one that counts . . . It is interesting to note that the term holocaust to mean mass extermination was never used during or immediately after WW2, only coming to vogue in the 1960s, when it was noted that false guilt could be assigned and reparations could be procured. Follow the shekels…

    Look at the commercialization of the so-called jewish holocaust while the much larger jewish bolshevik communist (true) holocaust is conveniently forgotten.

    To assure a continuing supply of jewish holocaust survivors, jews are tattooing their ATM (oops, I mean camp numbers) on their children and grandchildren.

    In addition, jewish psychologists have come up with a new concept, and disease “holocaust transference syndrome”. You see, children and grandchildren of jewish “holocaust survivors” are infected with this disease and should also be considered “holocaust survivors”, eligible for holocaust reparations. According to these jewish psychiatrists, even unrelated individuals (jews only) can be “infected”with this jewish-only “malady”.

    Since the Zionist jews declared war on Germany in 1933 (yes, 1933), the Germans had no choice but to complete the Zionist plan of marginalizing German jews (to say the least)..

    This fulfilled the Zionist plan of forcing German jews to emigrate to Palestine while making the world grant jews a homeland Israel. It is interesting to note that the German boycott of jewish businesses lasted for one day, while the jewish boycott (actually the jewish declaration of war on Germany) started in1933 and lasted until the summation of WW2.

    Let’s not forget that as “world jewry” declared WAR on Germany in 1933, a vile evil book “Germany Must Perish” was authored by Theodore N. Kaufman, a jew, who advocated the complete destruction and extermination of Germany, it’s people and culture, and erasure from the world timeline and history.

    Zionists have been predicting a jewish homeland for the last two-hundred years while predicting a holocaust of 6 million for the same amount of time.

    Regarding that premier (jewish freak show) holocaust showplace Auschwitz, there are engineering inconsistencies in the design of the so-called gas chambers. The doors are not of a gas-tight design; it would have been impossible to retrieve the bodies, and there is no means to ventilate the rooms after the so-called gassing took place. There is a gas chamber chimney that is not connected to anything.

    From an engineering standpoint, these are very serious errors that would have caused the deaths of the operators of these supposed gas chambers. As Germans were excellent engineers, it is difficult to observe the glaring engineering errors that presently exist in these camps.

    American execution expert, Fred Leuchter traveled to Auschwitz, surreptitiously obtained samples from the purported gas chambers, had them tested and published his results. The absence of Prussian blue (ferricyanide) in ALL of the samples, save one, was PROOF that the gas chambers did not exist. The one positive sample was taken from a room used to disinfect clothing. In fact, the chimney for the supposed gas chamber does not connect to anything.

    Mr. Leuchter was rewarded for his search for TRUTH with his professional and personal character assassination by those of the tribe. He lost all of his federal and state contracts, and was prosecuted under an obscure Massachusetts law for practicing engineering without a license-a law which had never been used vindictively before or since. . .After his report was published, he was harassed by Israeli “deep state” types (mossad) who he successfully “outed”.

    It is no secret that after WW2, the Soviets re-created the death camps for propaganda purposes. Yes, there was extreme deprivation and suffering–many people perished. The prime cause of death was typhus. As allied bombings destroyed most of the infrastructure, typhus was at epidemic levels. THIS is what caused the massive amounts of human deaths . . .NOT gassing.

    It is interesting to note that, before the camps were liberated by the allies, the camp occupants chose to flee with the German troops, rather than be liberated by the Russian allies.

    It is said that the light of day is the best disinfectant in the search for truth Unfortunately this quote does not apply to all things holocaust. It appears that there are those”holocaust promoters” who are afraid of the TRUTH as it would dry up their “cash cow”, hence the prosecution and incarceration of those who dare question aspects of this historical event.

    I urge all current holocaust believers to check these things out for yourselves IF YOU DARE. You will not like what you find

  26. …I am of Ukrainian descent and grew up with Jews, Croatians (Chicago Land) , and I can safely say that Thomas Dalton did an excellent job of exposing a fairytale! The Croatian nation in WW2, was short on weaponry, man-power, fuel to send hapless victims (Gypsies, Serbs, Jews, Croat commies!) to their supposed deaths at Jasenovac! The railways were always at risk of sabotage by Serbian Chetniks and later, the Serbian Partisans….so would it not be easier to “kill” them on site, instead of teansporting these poor victims to these “death” camps? The serbian Chetniks and partisans always had a continuous supply of weapons, from the British and later, the Americans! Ironically, it was William Colby (OSS and later CIA chief) who parachuted weapons to Joseph Tito in 1943. The daughter of Croatisn nationalist leader,Anton Pavelich, stated that Jasenovac was a work camp, NOT a death camp. Strange as it seems, this Joseph BROZ Tito’s name was rumoured to be Walter Weiss, Joseph Ambrose Mayer, Ledere Sonin, General Nikolai Lebedev, and he was not of Yugoskav origin, but one of the…cough, cough!

Current Commenter

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone

 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Thomas Dalton Comments via RSS
The Hidden Information in Our Government Archives
The Shaping Event of Our Modern World
The unspoken statistical reality of urban crime over the last quarter century.
How America was neoconned into World War IV
Analyzing the History of a Controversial Movement