The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 Greg Johnson Archive
It’s Okay to be White
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Something Here
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks
Just download and print!
Just download and print!

The Left characterizes the United States and other white countries around the world as systems of “white supremacy” and “white privilege.”

White Nationalists claim that the United States and most other white countries are committed to “white genocide”: the “great replacement” of whites by nonwhites, which is the predictable consequence of political decisions to promote sub-replacement white fertility, race-mixing, and race-replacement immigration.

Which of these diametrically opposed positions is true?

There’s an easy way to find out. In a white supremacist society, you should be able to declare that “It’s okay to be white” without controversy or consequences.

Indeed, in a white supremacist society, the only criticism you might receive is for being too tepid. After all, “okay” simply means “adequate but not especially good.” It is the equivalent to giving white existence a grade of “C.” Being white is apparently nothing to envy, but you wouldn’t kill yourself over it either.

You can buy It’s Okay to Be White: The Best of Greg Johnson here.
You can buy It’s Okay to Be White: The Best of Greg Johnson here.

When the slogan “It’s okay to be white” first appeared on 4chan’s /pol/ in 2017, it was promoted as a diagnostic tool to help convince “normies” that we live under anti-white regimes. After all, how could anyone object to “It’s okay to be white”?

The slogan does not claim that being white is great. It does not claim that being white is better. It merely says that being white is okay, which is the faintest possible praise. Furthermore, “It’s okay to be white” says nothing at all about other races. It certainly doesn’t denigrate them.

So on what grounds could one object to saying “It’s okay to be white”? As Tucker Carlson put it, “What’s the correct position? That it’s not okay to be white?”

If multiculturalism is truly an ideology of equality and inclusion, then multiculturalists should have no problem saying “It’s okay to be white.” They would grant it the same status as “Black is beautiful” and “It’s okay to be different.” Indeed, whiteness is one form of difference.

Clearly, one could object to a statement as innocuous as “It’s okay to be white” only if one really has something against white people, specifically a deep hatred or prejudice. This is why it is such a useful diagnostic tool.

“It’s okay to be white” flyers and stickers were posted widely in the United States and other white countries, primarily in the Anglosphere. As its creators predicted, the slogan provoked an immediate and intense backlash, far out of proportion to the inoffensive message.

Upon seeing “It’s okay to be white” signs and stickers, the first reaction of hundreds of people was to call the police. This can be verified simply by entering the words “police” and “It’s okay to be white” in the search engine of your choice. (DuckDuckGo gives the best results.) This happened even in the United States, where the First Amendment to the US Constitution protects freedom of speech. Here are a couple of my favorite headlines:

Indeed, sometimes people deemed these posters too hot for the local cops to handle, so the Federal Bureau of Investigation was called in:

To put this in context, ask yourself how many flyers and stickers you see in a typical day. Dozens? On a university campus, you might see hundreds. Then ask yourself how many times you were tempted to call the police. Most people would have to answer: never. But when hundreds of people saw “It’s okay to be white,” they were convinced that it is illegal—or that it should be.

Once the police were called, of course the press were alerted, and locals were asked to share their opinions about the flyers. Most people interviewed are certain that “It’s okay to be white” constitutes “hate speech,” even though it says nothing negative or hateful about anyone.

I’ll pull quotes from just one article to give a sense of the sort of statements that are typical: John Swinney, Deputy First Minister of the Scottish Government, declared: “This is atrocious and has no place in Perth or any other part of our country. We must stand together to resist this unacceptable material.” Peter Barrett, a Perth councilor, said: “This is despicable hate speech. It is covert racism disguising white supremacist views. People should be in no doubt this is no innocuous joke.” Local antiracists claimed that people of color had called to share their feelings. The “terrifying attitudes” expressed by “It’s okay to be white” made them feel “sickened,” “disgusted,” and “unsafe.”

My favorite political statement comes from Mayor William Dickinson, Jr. of Wallingford, Connecticut: “whoever posted the signs reading ‘It’s okay to be white’ don’t speak for the people of Wallingford,” he declared, speaking for the people of Wallingford.

Given that higher education is a citadel of the extreme Left throughout the white world, reactions to “It’s okay to be white” on university campuses are especially extreme, as one can see by typing the phrase plus the word “campus” into any search engine. Here are my favorite headlines:

Naturally, university administrators—especially in Podunk schools—can be counted on for the most vehement denunciations of “It’s okay to be white.” President John Clark of Western Connecticut State University’s fulminations are typical: “I want to state directly and without equivocation that if any member of our university community is found to be party to these revolting actions they will be subject to the severest disciplinary actions, including dismissal as well as possible civil and criminal actions.” These are not empty threats. A student at Oklahoma City University School of Law was expelled for posting “It’s okay to be white” and ended up talking to the FBI’s Joint Terrorism Task Force.

My favorite “It’s okay to be white” story is from Australia (75% white), where Senator Pauline Hanson of the nationalist One Nation Party proposed a non-binding statement condemning anti-white racism and declaring “It’s okay to be white.” Although politicians constantly append their names to all manner of high-minded but empty proclamations, and although not a single Senator in Australia should have had a problem with affirming that “It’s okay to be white,” the resolution was narrowly defeated on October 15, 2018.

Is any of this behavior consistent with the claim that the United States and other white countries are systems of “white supremacism” and “white privilege”? Obviously not. If we lived in a white supremacist system, people would be afraid to call the police about “It’s okay to be white” flyers and stickers. College administrators would be afraid to threaten students with punishment. Legislators would be afraid to vote against “It’s okay to be white.” But instead, they know that the entire establishment—political, business, media, and academic—is anti-white. Thus it will approve of their behavior and give them a pat on the head.

But just how anti-white is this system? Is it really committed to white genocide? One can interpret “It’s okay to be white” in at least two ways. The most natural reading is “It’s good to be white.” But the word “okay” is such tepid praise that maybe we should interpret the phrase more along these lines: “It is acceptable to be white,” or better, “It is acceptable for white people to be—to exist,” or “Don’t kill yourself over being white.”

You can buy Greg Johnson’s From Plato to Postmodernism here
You can buy Greg Johnson’s From Plato to Postmodernism here

A society in which one can be punished for merely asserting that “It is acceptable for white people to exist” is obviously hostile to the very existence of whites. It is a society in which it is unacceptable for white people to exist. But if this is true, wouldn’t it be natural to explore ways of getting rid of whites altogether? The genocidal implications are obvious.

One might counter that those who object to “It’s okay to be white” do not object to the existence of white people but merely to white pride and white self-assertion. Of course, “It’s okay to be white” is not a statement of pride and self-assertion. It is absurdly unassuming, almost an apology for existing. But even that is apparently too much self-worth for the preachers of “white guilt” and self-abnegation.

However, even the ideology of “white guilt” is implicitly genocidal. First of all, there is no path to absolution from white guilt. As long as non-whites are unequal to whites, whites will somehow be held guilty. And because inequality is natural, it will always exist. Second, we live in a world of racial strife, and a race without pride or self-assertiveness—a race burdened with eternal guilt and self-reproach—will fall prey to races without such handicaps.

The best-case scenario is that whites will forever be poisoned with spurious guilt for the inadequacies of others, then milked for free stuff. In short: slavery. The worst-case scenario is outright genocide. And given that violence and instability increase with diversity, orderly factory-farm slavery is the least likely outcome. Thus objecting to white pride—or even mere white “okayness”—is ultimately objecting to white existence as such.

Do the people who object to “It’s okay to be white” consciously promote white genocide, or do they know not what they do? Most of them don’t know what they are doing. White genocide is the long-term result of the principles they act on, but most people don’t think about the long-term. They unwittingly promote white genocide while thinking they are being moral, pragmatic, or even selfish, because they know that they will be rewarded for anti-white signaling.

The great value of “It’s okay to be white” is that when one attacks such banal pro-white sentiments, it brings the implicitly genocidal programming of the Left very close to the surface. If you get hysterical about white people merely existing and not feeling suicidal about it, what do you really stand for anyway?

Of course, the real point of “It’s okay to be white” is not to save the souls of anti-whites but to educate ordinary people. This is why we need to keep “It’s okay to be white” constantly in the news. The same is true with “All Lives Matter,” which can get you killed. More to the point is “White Lives Matter,” which can get you fired.

Force the Left to say “It’s not okay to be white.” Force them to say “White lives don’t matter.” And make sure that everyone knows it. Also, be sure to take down names. If a doctor, lawyer, professor, or politician does not think it is okay to be white, then how can he be trusted to serve the interests of whites? White racists are routinely fired on the assumption that they cannot deal professionally with non-whites. Anti-white racists need to be held to the same standards. A white person would have to be nuts to go under the knife of a surgeon who says “White lives don’t matter.” We would be foolish to expect anti-white professors to grade us justly. Whites must be protected from such people. It is our job to hold institutions accountable.

When the entire establishment comes together to denounce “It’s okay to be white” or “White lives matter,” it decisively refutes the Left’s thesis that we live in systems of white supremacism and privilege. It also exposes that multiculturalism does not envision a world in which whites enjoy equality and harmony with other groups. The multiculturalist utopia does not envision whites at all.

(Republished from Counter-Currents Publishing by permission of author or representative)
 
Hide 333 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. Anon[183] • Disclaimer says:

    It is a truism that while most White people have no wish to totally exterminate people of colour, the reverse is seldom true. Which is why the remaining Whites in South Africa have been placed on the genocide watch in a category higher than anyone else has been before.

  2. Franz says:

    When the entire establishment comes together to denounce “It’s okay to be white” or “White lives matter,” it decisively refutes the Left’s thesis that we live in systems of white supremacism and privilege.

    This sounds sane and reasonable which is where the trouble is. Reason and sanity departed this zoo long time back.

    The people who work the BLM mobs have learned well that all they have to do is repeat “White Privilege” constantly at their pack ass followers and no doubts will ever arise. Professionals and wise men know a mob of these creatures can shout down anyone the mob handlers point at.

    Sad to say, this is Wiemar Germany replayed as farce. Something, an event of some sort perhaps, can snap the continuing chain of events, but nobody knows what.

  3. J Adelmen says:

    Meaning is never produced in a vacuum. Statements have historical and cultural contexts and ideology is embedded in the language we use. Written texts can produce meaning, using rhetorical devices, like metaphor and irony.
    “It’s okay to be white,” appears to be a literal, or denotative, message, but when we read it in context — against the backdrop of institutionalized euro-centrism and current anti-racist political movements like Black Lives Matter — we see that it is far from benign.

    Just wait till November, Racists will get to know what is right and what is wrong.
    With Democrat winning the Senate and Presidency, we will make sure that all the undocumented immigrants are legalized, DC and Puerto Rico are granted statehood and stricter hate crime and hate speech laws will be enacted along with mandatory Diversity quotas in each and every sector.
    We will make America Great for the very first time.

  4. sonofman says:

    No, it is not okay to be just „white“. It is not okay to ignore your individuality and allow yourself to be group associated (based upon skin color?!) and then negatively stereotyped (supremacist?). It is not okay to be held responsible and feel shame about reprehensible circumstances of the past, credited to individuals and alliances that are characterized with the same generalizing label that assumes affiliation. It is not okay to espouse or believe that principals, morals and beliefs are existent at the moment of conception, and vary according to genetics. “Black”, is not a race, it is an American sub-culture effectuated from slavery. “White,” is also not a race or ideology or even a culture. It is only a term used to throw all of the different Europeans into one boat (similar to the “European Union”, and similarly delusive). “Race”, is a theory with little or no scientific basis and is being used to guilt- pressure societies towards acceptance of alternative and dubious indoctrination. At the moment, the whole World seems to be going postal over mythical narratives, and anything pertaining to “Race” is certainly one of them. If you are inclined to use that terminology, in America, there is only one group that would fit the description. The People. This is the group that defines the American culture. So, even if you are in the “white” boat, as long as you are American you are definitely okay.

    • Agree: utu, Robjil
    • LOL: 3g4me
    • Troll: frontier
  5. @Franz

    You’re right: the likes of BLM and Antifa can’t be reasoned with. But Johnson’s tactic could still help wake up some fence-sitting White moderates in time, so I think it’s a tactic worth promoting.

    • Agree: kikz, Franz
    • Replies: @Kevin Barrett
  6. I see this rhetoric about “white privilege” as so destructive to real progress that I can’t help but wonder which conservative think tank thought it up.

    I can’t imagine a better way to recruit a new Trump voter than by telling someone who has to work two jobs to barely support their family how they must give up the great “privilege” they have, in fact which they enjoy only at the expense of black people.

    It is not a privilege not to be discriminated against: it is the natural condition of a citizen in society. It’s appalling to read people blathering such idiotic nonsense as “I must surrender my toxic white privilege so black people can be free.” Really? Since when is freedom a zero sum game, that the only way some can get more is for others to give up what they have? That’s a classic reactionary position, grounded in the irrational fear that there’s not enough freedom to go around. In fact there is plenty for everyone. And a foundation of mental health is the awareness that no one is responsible for anyone’s actions but their own. No one should be shamed by smooth talkers into making amends for a misdeed they did not personally commit. Guilt has its place in coming to terms with actual mistakes, but shame is never acceptible; it is a destructive conditioning, infamously employed by abusers to control their victims. To me these foolish mea culpas I see are ugly reminders of the tenacity of the destructive old Christian fantasy of sin and redemption. Instead of pledging to “renounce Satan and all his wiles”, the new faithful are required to repudiate their heritage and standing in society in order to be saved.

    And it is infinitely troubling that the Ford Foundation, J P Morgan Chase, and other gatekeepers of the status quo pour tens of millions into BLM’s coffers. Capitalism requires a permanent underclass to prosper; it will never fund its own extinction. Its minions are generous to controlled opposition movements which serve them by distracting us from the fundamental problem of our culture, the unequal distribution of wealth. I don’t like it one bit that it is absolutely forbidden to question the motives of those who seem to be foisting a grand scam on the naïve pampered children of the petite bourgoisie. Veteran black activists have called out BLM as a tool of the Democratic Party from day one, but they have been marginalized and silenced.

  7. Stick says:

    Serious question. Does Crayola Crayons still identify ‘flesh color’ as a pinkish off white? Do they have a POC Flesh Crayon now?

    • Replies: @JosephB
    , @Bill Jones
  8. Getaclue says:
    @J Adelmen

    Dear Adelman: I think the calculating/scheming Jews behind so much of the “hate whitey” agenda will soon find out to their great, great dismay, as we have seen in just the last week, that Blacks see them as “white” and actually as the most PRIVILEGED of all — (and as a real/powerful enemy who has historically been highly involved in Slavery and taking advantage of Black people in every way imaginable while pretending the opposite, “knife into the back” as has been a historical complaint for generations as to Jews wherever they show up…) — which of course they are in fact privileged beyond all — financially and in every way Jew Privilege is the reality– as is Jew networking/racism against others.

    Jews, as anyone who does any research knows (Frankfurt School, Communists involved in mass murder in Russia under Lenin/Stalin etc.), have been behind ALL of this incitement of hatred against “whites” as they think it is to their advantage and that “whites” are the group that historically has blocked the networked Jews from completely ruling/lording it over everyone as they want to do, so the Jews decided YT must be destroyed and they are trying to use the Blacks to do it in this current incarnation of attempted total Jewish Supremacy we are seeing work out…. — Let us know how Jewish incitement of hatred toward “whites” works out in the end…Dr. Fankenstein.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  9. @J Adelmen

    What up Adelman!

    With Democrat winning the Senate and Presidency… stricter hate crime and hate speech laws will be enacted…

    Curious for your opinion: when those hate speech laws are enacted, will observant Ashkenazim still be allowed to declare themselves “God’s Chosen?”

    Let me try to anticipate your answer: Yes! Especially when you consider the historical context of anti-semitic persecution in the US. Justice for Leo Frank! (And he would’ve gotten it too if it wasn’t for that lying schwartze on the witness stand. But at least that filthy shiksa got what she deserved. What was her name? Who cares!?)

  10. For the “Whites” who are offended by “It’s OK to be White”, I ask ‘Are you saying it’s not OK for you to be you?’ and/or ‘Why do you hate yourself?’ then walk away.

  11. How about: Cracker Ass Pecker Wood Lives Matter!

    Pro-white, but self-deprecating. Worth a shot?

  12. . . it was promoted as a diagnostic tool to help convince “normies” that we live under anti-white regimes

    It’s an interesting idea, but in a college setting at least, these signs will be automatically interpreted as giving aid to Nazi types, which suggests who might have put them there. Perhaps you see this kind of response as proof that we live under anti-white “regimes”?

    • Replies: @Wally
    , @Bogus Pogus
  13. A Texan says:

    It’s not just OK, it’s awesome to be white!

    It’s a hard a pill for some to swallow, but race, IQ, and culture matter. There are some outstanding exceptions, but can we admit that Africans are stupid? And those of brown hue collectively speaking with exceptions of course are not much better?

    We do have po’ whites and such, but they cause a lot less problems most of the time than the rest of the duh-versities.

    • Agree: Realist, kikz
    • Replies: @paranoid goy
  14. Usura says:
    @sonofman

    Allow me to respond to your post line by line.

    “It is not okay to ignore your individuality and allow yourself to be group associated.”

    Acknowledging in-group does not necessarily entail ignoring individuality. And depending on the context, you will likely have no control over your group association; to the majority of blacks, I’m white, period, no matter how expertly I deconstruct such a concept.

    “based upon skin color?!”

    No, based on shared ancestry.

    “and then negatively stereotyped (supremacist?)”

    Only by people who deliberately mis-characterize the white nationalist position.

    “It is not okay to espouse or believe that principals, morals and beliefs are existent at the moment of conception, and vary according to genetics.”

    Morals and beliefs may be more tenuous, but behaviour has been consistently proven to be significantly predicted by genetics. Here’s an example:
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monoamine_oxidase_A

    “Black”, is not a race, it is an American sub-culture effectuated from slavery.”

    In America, black means “of majority African descent”; it means absolutely nothing about slavery, as there are American blacks, who self-identify as black, whose ancestors were not slaves. White means “of majority European descent”.

    “‘White,’ is also not a race or ideology or even a culture. It is only a term used to throw all of the different Europeans into one boat (similar to the “European Union”, and similarly delusive). “

    Again, white is just a stand-in for “of majority European descent”, as in mostly haplogroups E1b1b, , I, J, R1a, and R1b. Compared with West Africans or East Asians, for example, it is perfectly reasonable to throw Europeans into one boat.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_genetic_clustering

    “‘Race’, is a theory with little or no scientific basis and is being used to guilt- pressure societies towards acceptance of alternative and dubious indoctrination.”

    Genetic ancestry is a concept with solid scientific backing, and extensive methods have been refined in order to study genetic clustering of populations, which mostly vindicate pre-scientific intuitions about race.

    “At the moment, the whole World seems to be going postal over mythical narratives, and anything pertaining to “Race” is certainly one of them.”

    Indeed, populations the world over are waking up to the fact that they have been lied to by Enlightenment(TM) intellectuals for the better part of 200 years regarding the irrelevance of group identity. They want out of the insane failed experiment that is multiculturalism, and who can blame them?

    “So, even if you are in the “white” boat, as long as you are American you are definitely okay.”

    So, you’re saying it’s OK to be white? 😉

  15. Yeah, sure, race is just a construct. We’re all the same. We all bleed red. Good grief, what a dunce…

    • Replies: @Marylou
  16. KenH says:

    the resolution was narrowly defeated on October 15, 2018.

    That’s actually great news. If a white U.S. Senator made a similar proposal in America he would have been kicked out of the upper chamber and subjected to hate and death threats in “free” America. His (or her) resolution never would have been considered.

    Most people interviewed are certain that “It’s okay to be white” constitutes “hate speech,” even though it says nothing negative or hateful about anyone.

    One of Alex Linder’s best maxims is that the left acts like anything they don’t like is de facto illegal (even though it’s perfectly legal). If you read enough current events left wing politicians routinely refer to “hate speech” like it’s a legal category and suggesting it’s not protected by the 1st amendment.

    The people posting “It’s ok to be white” signs should post “It’s ok to be black” or something similar in the same venue to see if the reaction by the local yokels and their leaders would be revulsion, hatred, fear and anger or praise. I guarantee it would be the latter and it would be chalked up as freedom of expression proving that blacks, not whites, have privilege.

  17. @J Adelmen

    Hey there again, Adelman. Enjoying your curry soaked matzo ball again, I hope?

    Anyway, I am happy to see you supporting such progressive policies as “mandatory Diversity quotas in each and every sector.”

    Just curious: Under these diversity quotas will your Tribe make up 2% of Supreme Court judges, Federal Reserve directors, Wall St execs, hedge fund managers, accountants, finance professors, as well as farmers, coal miners, pipe fitters, welders, janitors and regime change war casualties?

    If so, I’m on board 6,000,000%!

    • Agree: Realist
    • LOL: Stan d Mute
  18. First Gregory Hood then Greg Johnson – Counter-Currents has come to the Unz Review. Luckily, I read Johnson’s “Truth, Justice and a Nice White Country” and “The White Nationalist Manifesto” before they were scrubbed by Amazon.

    Kudos to Ron Unz for having the courage to publish such controversial white advocates. And let’s not forget the recently added prolific Eric Striker. This site, with its multitude of diverse talent, is the best thing sliced bread, and well worth my monthly donation.

    As time goes on and the country implodes, the views of these men grow more prescient. It’s late in the game, the seventh inning stretch is over, and our side is losing. Can we still score enough runs, or, will the game wind up as in TS Eliot’s “The Hollow Men”:

    This is the way the world end
    Not with a bang but a whimper.”

  19. @follyofwar

    Oops: Should have been “This is the way the world ends” Ran out of time to change it.

  20. Best way to fight the ‘left’ is to give into their demands.

    https://theduran.com/chaos-in-the-blue-cities/

    The so-called ‘left’ is an alliance of rich urban elites and over-educated mobs who resent the fact that they have to work at Starbucks or live with their parents while some of their peers are doing so well as urban yupsters.

    Yuppies, hipsters, and antifa thugs(and BLM morons).

    The proggy elites bestowed their blessings on the angry mobs in the name of combating evil Trump and ‘racists’, but the mobs are tearing down blue cities and making things worse for urban elites.

    It’s glorious to watch.

    Defund the police, and let rich yuppies be at the mercy of the mob that they claim to love so much.

    BLM!!

    • Replies: @Emslander
  21. Logical progression. When a majority of people have awareness of the vilification of the ‘OK to be White’ meme, change it to a simple white sheet of paper with “OK” written on it. After that is thoroughly denounced, change it to just a blank sheet of white paper. Really looking forward to the FBI investigating blank sheets of white paper.

  22. I don’t know why people use DuckDuckGo search engine. I’m sure the only reason why it’s giving uncensored search results, is because the jewish guy who owns it, hasn’t figured out how to censor the results yet. But I’m sure he’s working on it.

    I did the “American Inventor” search on Google. I got pages of search results of “Wakandans”. It was if America was built by Africans? I did the search on Bing and DuckDuckGo — same results.

    I used Yandex, a Russian search engine, and it was the only one with historically accurate results.

    • Replies: @Johnny Smoggins
  23. Wally says:
    @J Adelmen

    Then who will pay the bills?

    Who will keep “that shitty little country” alive?

    I do agree though, Puerto Rico & DC should pay federal taxes.

    Zionists like J Adelmen demand low IQ, 3rd world immigration into Euro-white majority countries while they violently support very strict Israeli immigration laws which allow JEWS ONLY.

  24. The absurdity of those who object to the meme is…..insane…..

    and that level of insanity can only come from one specific crew of vicious paranoids.

    No normal person could possibly object to the meme as it is as benign as can be.

    The small hats cannot even abide by allowing that whites are okay…..they demand that
    everyone must agree that whites are NOT okay, and that whites must be hated and destroyed.

    This is so silly, so supernaturally ridiculous…….you have to ask yourself……how does the nose get away with this shit?

  25. FBI probes signs defending white privilege found at Vermont universities

    Vermont is white privilege.

    For awhile wags were posting signs saying “Islam is right about women.” The other side was frozen. We could do the same with “Whites are wrong about gays.”

    It would look nice with a backdrop like one of these:


    The

    • Replies: @dfordoom
  26. Wally says:
    @gaston julia

    said:
    “It’s an interesting idea, but in a college setting at least, these signs will be automatically interpreted as giving aid to Nazi types, which suggests who might have put them there. Perhaps you see this kind of response as proof that we live under anti-white “regimes”?”

    “Nazi types”? Yawn.

    Given that the “Nazis” did not do what is alleged, you’re pointing out the need to expose the real enabler of all this nonsense, the fake & impossible “holocaust”.

    Visit http://www.codoh.com where free speech still exists.

    Cheers.

  27. We are surrounded by very dangerous people. The most dangerous among them are those white people who are either “allies” in this nascent genocide, or those who are oblivious to what is plainly in front of them.

    • Replies: @Realist
  28. LarryS says:

    All White people are under suspicion. Perhaps woke Whites should wear a black star.

  29. Richard B says:
    @Anon

    It is a truism that while most White people have no wish to totally exterminate people of colour, the reverse is seldom true.

    Nietzsche warned us to Beware of The Preachers of Equality.

    For in them lies – revenge.

    Revenge for everything from the possibly real to the totally imagined.

    This insanity isn’t going to stop itself.

    So, if Whites don’t stop it, it’ll never stop.

    Until they stop Whites, forever.

    • Agree: bruce county
  30. @Wally

    Given that the “Nazis” did not do what is alleged,

    Oh, but my dear, they fully did! Forget about the mythical sixmillions, that is just projection of Jewish crimes upon others. No, what the Nazis did was totally awful! Remember, the Jews did not declare war on Hitler, it was National Socialism they need to “…eradicate all memory of…”.
    The friggin’ Nazis went and ran an economy without borrowing from the Bank. Within ten years Germany became the most prosperous country in the world, and that had to be stopped. Italy and Japan already started following the evil Nazi example, and they were dealt with just like they were White scum. What would become of Jahwe’s promise of Juda ruling all the nations of the world with an iron staff, if you White people keep on forging your own iron, eh?
    But with speculation and the commodities market, White man has so little iron left, metal dealers now accept highway safety barriers as scrap metal for ‘recycling’.
    Praise god for his protection of his flock.

    • Agree: Bill Jones, Emslander
    • Thanks: anarchyst
    • Replies: @Whitewolf
  31. Exile says:
    @sonofman

    More of the typical gaslighting Whites are subjected to when they respond to the dishonest, vicious and ignorant anti-White fanatics that hate us while being curiously reluctant to live apart from us.

    Everyone who reacts negatively to “It is OK to be White” knows what “White” means. Same with “White Privilege,” etc…

    If “Black” describes an “American sub-culture,” why are non-American Blacks both in America and Europe concerned with “Black Lives Matter” and why have so many foreign countries seen “Black Lives Matter” protests?

    You are either a dupe of modern academia’s critical theory pseudo-disciplines derived from the Frankfurt School, Boas, Foucault, Derrida, etc.. or you are deliberately spreading disinformation.

    Either way, your arguments are fraudulent, as Ursula also explains in more detail above.

  32. It’s interesting that woke, anti-white thinking tends to be strongest in the richest white countries. Anti-white thinking is very strong in Scandinavia, Australia and the US, but not so prevalent in Poland, or Greece or Argentina. It also tends to be a lot stronger among the upper 10 percent of whites in terms of income and education level.

    The logical response from white identitarians is to make white identity politics an explicitly working class movement. Not only does this tap into the core demographic that tends to most favourable to white identity politics, but it also puts white identity politics on a stronger legal footing in the age of hate speech laws.

    Relative to upper class whites, its hard to claim working class whites are a privileged group, or that promoting working class white interests is a form of supremacist politics (weed out the super wealthy whites from the stats, and whites aren’t as economically privileged as leftists claim). And in any case, why should struggling working and lower-middle class whites, waste time and money representing privileged upper class whites who are doing quite nicely out of low cost virtue signalling and economic globalism.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  33. @A Texan

    …as one of my parliamentarians said after reading an “open letter to the government” by a prolific if mediocre singer with delusions of leadership:
    “Thank you, Steve Hoffmeyer, you have just proven that not only Black people can be stupid”.
    If you think you can fight this by being a bigger racist than your enemy, then what makes you better than those Joose you despise so much?
    Or are you just here to crap on the conversation, to implicate everyone here in your imaginary bravery that is actually just hatred?
    Or are you just stupid?

    • Replies: @3g4me
    , @Exile
  34. Anonymous[401] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anon

    > “the remaining Whites in South Africa have been placed on the genocide watch”

    In response, White Euro-America males (who fapped, drank beer, and watched sports for 54+ years while feminists-PC-SJW-BLM-etc. did the Mexican Hat Dance on their testicles) do nothing.

    They cluck like impotent hens while white SA males are murdered.

    Today’s white cucked, conservative, Christian men sit for every abuse, stand for nothing.

    They are mice-manginas…endlessly bitching online while the actual world implodes.

  35. @J Adelmen

    And if the context is dominated by a widely shared collective delusion concerning the existence of ‘white privilege’? If white societies are in fact systemically anti-racist, to the point of sacrificing the interests of their white majorities?

    Isn’t the proper response then to question the delusion and seek to undo its harmful effects on the individuals who suffer as a result of it?

    Of course, this standpoint requires one to believe there is something called objective reality and that we can gain a better understanding of that reality by means of open, rational discourse.

  36. Anonymous[401] • Disclaimer says:
    @J Adelmen

    > “Meaning is never produced in a vacuum.”

    Unless you’re J. Edgar Hoover. ( “ ‘It’s okay to be white’…read…against the backdrop of institutionalized euro-centrism and current anti-racist political movements like Black Lives Matter…is far from benign.”

    Meanwhile, violent, low-impulse-controlled, illiterate, institutionalized black inferiorcistic, innumerate, rude-crude-lewd, welfare-dependent, fatherless-family, mooching Amero-Wakandans contribute sooooooooooo much to civilization. Right?

  37. Jorge Videla [AKA "yt bulger"] says:

    calling these people “the left” is unfortunate. they’re not bolshies or montagnards. they’re puppets of capital and (((capital))) and its organs. as long as miserable people think they’re problem is “systemic racism” and not capitalism and its accompanying political corruption, the powerful have no fear. it’s just andre the giant vs hulk hogan and the 99% thinks it’s real. beginning with bill clinton the poor of all races have had no representation. clinton replaced real politics, the politics of class, with fake politics, idpol. is greg afraid he’ll be disappeared if he talks about who’s really pulling the strings.

  38. Jorge Videla [AKA "yt bulger"] says:

    in this corner transphobia, systemic racism, and anti-semitism.

    in this corner a black, a jew, and a black jew queer.

    let’s get ready to ruuuuuumble!

  39. Whitewolf says:

    If you really want to test how anti-White the system is the flyers should be:

    “It is acceptable for Whites to exist”

  40. We get it Greg, they’re replacing us. Now what are we supposed to do about it?

    And don’t dare say the “slow cleanse”.

    The answer is split up the United States.

    We had 4 years to prepare for this but we squandered it on misadventures (to include standing with the Enemy on the Panic-Driven Lockdown).

    Can we do in 4 months what in 4 years would have been difficult?

    • Replies: @The Real World
    , @Corvinus
  41. Whitewolf says:
    @paranoid goy

    The pre war period of NS rule needs to be looked at in isolation much more than it has been. It’s always been overshadowed by the war and talk about various battles and of course genocidal gas chambers or lack thereof.

    • Replies: @Winnetou1889
  42. Divide a woke college area into thirds and put different signs in each area:

    It’s OK to be White
    It’s OK to be Black
    It’s OK to be Asian

    Sit back and watch the fireworks.

  43. @KenH

    “That’s actually great news. If a white U.S. Senator made a similar proposal in America he would have been kicked out of the upper chamber and subjected to hate and death threats in “free” America. His (or her) resolution never would have been considered.”
    Senator Hanson is notorious in Australia. She has been around one way or another for 25 years. She is considered to be completely “out there” or “over the top”. She’s also not the sharpest knife in the draw. Thus she gets a certain latitude that others probably wouldn’t get.
    One of her most famous stunts was to attend a Senate sitting in a full burka — now that did cause general ructions !
    (I have a degree of sympathy for her: she was a victim of a clear conspiracy by our conservatives — the Liberals — to have her charged & imprisoned on always dubious financial grounds. She went to prison for some time before being fully exonerated by an Appeals Court. At the time a new low in gutter politics here.

  44. AceDeuce says:

    Good stuff, but he loses me by (evidently) taking the whole “people of color” BS seriously. Everyone is “of color”.

    Nonwhites pretty much can be described as of fecal or urinary color. I have no objection if that level of accuracy is used, but I do object to the whole binary nature of the white/nonwhite divide regarding this infantile “of color”.

    I never watched much of fatso Oprah’s show, but every time that I did, it was educational in terns of negro racism. One of her later shows that I did see was after the whole POC BS started and Fatso was babbling about “people of color”. She then”jokingly” mentioned whites, calling them “nonpeople of color, or people of noncolor, or whatever, as the braindead white women all merrily laughed.

    Bottom line: It’s fine to do our thing, although we’re being far too mild (I expect that to change), but we need to jump down their throats for the crap they say, as well.

  45. American Citizen 2.0 says:

    First thing I would point out is that “white supremacy” has all but become the “Flat Earth” conspiracy of Black Twitter. They just know it’s true and will continue to prove that it’s true in spite of all the evidence to the contrary, evidence such as what Greg is presenting here. Likewise, there is only one acceptable review of the movie Black Panther and it is that Black Panther was the greatest movie ever made.

    But beyond that I would like to challenge readers, a propos Greg’s point that saying “All Lives Matter” can get you killed, to try the following at a party the next chance you get… try saying this to strangers:

    I have been slogging through a couple of Toni Morrison books lately and I am not getting much out of them but I found a slim volume of poems by Keats at the library the other day and I have to say it’s fantastic.

  46. Miro23 says:
    @Observator

    It’s appalling to read people blathering such idiotic nonsense as “I must surrender my toxic white privilege so black people can be free”.

    It’s no different from the Bolsheviks (Russia 1917) blathering their idiotic nonsense “You must surrender your toxic class privilege (property and freedom) so that the workers can be free”.

    In both cases it’s a fabricated justification for an organized Jewish assault on a host society (ethnic Russian 1917 – ethnic Anglo 2020) aiming for totalitarian dictatorship. In Russia the Bolshevik Jews became the “Leading cadre of the Working Class” and in the US they no doubt aim to be the “Leading cadre of Social Justice and Anti-Racism”.

    Under Bolshevism any dissent was violently suppressed (including workers) with millions of people “liquidated” or transported to a network of work/death camps (Gulag) spread across the Soviet Union.

    Under US Neo-Bolshevism the outcome would likely be the same. It’s being run by the same evil crowd along the same evil lines. The US public really have no idea of the danger that’s facing them.

    • Replies: @cassandra
  47. Never apologize for the skin you were born with. God gave you that skin, God gave you your parents. God made you the son or daughter of the nation in which you were born. Never apologize for who you are. Never surrender. Never back down. Stand tall and fight for only that which is alive can fight while the dead float down the river with the current. That is my message to my White Brothers and Sisters and I myself am not White but Brown (of mixed European and American Indigenous blood).

  48. @Anon

    Frankly, I think that if white people in America were polled and answered honestly, the vast majority would say that they simply want to be done with everything black, to be as far as possible from blacks, from their troubles, from their unlimited complaining. The notion that whites want to be “supreme” is ridiculous; they simply have no real use for black people and no real desire to mix with them. Their conscience bothers them; it tells them that they should be all-loving and all-embracing. But somehow something inside tells them that they’d better live in a white suburb far from it all. I think that is a good part of the reason why the “progressive” left is so hysterical, so crazy and so violent today, because it is trying desperately to prove something that at heart it disagrees with.

    • Agree: Emslander, Joseph Doaks
  49. Biff says:

    There was similar outrage(but not nearly as bad) when atheists put up a billboard saying “you’re not alone”

    Point is – it ain’t hard to get people’s underwear in a bundle.

  50. JosephB says:
    @Stick

    Some googling said “flesh” was changed to “peach” in 1962. Additionally:
    https://www.cnn.com/2020/05/22/us/crayola-skin-tone-crayons-trnd/index.html

    • Thanks: Liza
  51. Moi says:
    @Anon

    Whites are stupid–only stupid people will turn over the country they built to immigrants. Now it’s time to say bye-bye to an America that once was…

    • Agree: Realist
    • Disagree: Corvinus
  52. @J Adelmen

    Meaning is never produced in a vacuum. Statements have historical and cultural contexts and ideology is embedded in the language we use. Written texts can produce meaning, using rhetorical devices, like metaphor and irony.
    “It’s okay to be white,” appears to be a literal, or denotative, message, but when we read it in context — against the backdrop of institutionalized euro-centrism and current anti-racist political movements like Black Lives Matter — we see that it is far from benign.

    Fun rationalisation!

    But why don’t people feel bad when they are screaming at someone for stating “it is ok to be white?”

    Or worse, trying to get them fired, and render them into unemployable stigma?

  53. American Citizen 2.0 says:
    @Observator

    “White Privilege” really comes from old French and Spanish Revolutionary writings pertaining to Aristocratic Privilege and Clerical Privilege. Back in the olden days, titled landowners and clergy really did have special rights relative to the population as a whole. We don’t really have those kinds of rights now but we are encouraged to do a weird kind of existential digging in our own psyches to discover where we are acting like we are better than everyone else as if we are Princes and Dukes and Bishops. During the European revolutionary movements, French and Spanish peasants especially pushed for the abolishment of those special “privileges” as they were called, which of course the Clerics and Titled Landowners resisted vehemently. So, whenever people refer to “White Privilege” just keep in mind that they are really saying that white people, usually white women, have an almost aristocratic status in our society, which is sort of true given our cultural connection to “Chivalry”. But, in reality we are not aristocrats and we don’t treat each other as if we are aristocrats. We all know we have the same rights before the law.

    So, the BLM sock puppets have been taught by their Marxist professors to revive this old criticism from European revolutionary movements but apply it to ordinary people as a kind of insult as a kind of spiteful non-sequitur to motivate anguish in otherwise perfectly normal, happy white people.

    They are pure Copy-Paste flim-flam artists who are merely parroting revolutionary ideas they read in books about France and Spain.

    • Thanks: Whitewolf
    • Replies: @Pheasant
  54. Sign of the times (although I’m more bothered by the repetition and lack of brevity of the article). Much like pink pussyhats signal that the #resistance will not accept Elections when their candidate loses, and MAGA hats signal Trump support and “Fuck the Establishment”, these short hand signals are getting out of control. The woman who was shot in the back and killed by Black Supremacists recently just shows how strident and violent things are getting over nothing.
    People my age were taught before elementary school that “sticks and stones will break my bones but words will never hurt me”. This was associated with “small feelings” or “hurt feelings” common to the four year old universe. The bottom line used to be you could say ANYTHING to ANYONE unless a line to violence was crossed or incitement of violence by others quickly followed. Now you can shoot people or beat them to bloody pulps if you righteously disagree with their point of view. I always though America was basically a bunch of stupid ten year olds, now they are a bunch of violent, dangerous four year olds.

  55. the ghey on the other hand .. maybe not okay

  56. anonymous[299] • Disclaimer says:

    Johnson and Spencer the two gay parading loving jew agents have got to keep it about race. But it is not about race. It is about the hatred of the innocent Christ. Why do the Jews hate the innocent Christ?

    • Replies: @Neuday
  57. SZ says:

    I feel pity towards Western Europeans and their offshoots in the new worlds (what you guys call ‘white’, a moronic expression in itself. No Asian, for example, will call himself or herself ‘yellow’).

    But Westerners had it coming. If such a piece of utter nonsense can be put on the website of a ‘respectable’ Western paper, then there is no hope for them:

    https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/oct/16/its-ok-to-be-white-is-not-a-joke-its-careless-politicians-helping-the-far-right

    For God’s sake, look at the commenter’s picture! He is the personification of self-denial and stupidity: his stupid haircut, the empty look in his eyes, the way he presses his lips together, and the sheer nonsense he has written, are all in alignment.

    There will be a time when such examples of delusional self-denial of Westerners will be taught at universities all over Eurasia as how to wreck your own society.

  58. Emslander says:
    @Franz

    Sad to say, this is Wiemar Germany replayed as farce. Something, an event of some sort perhaps, can snap the continuing chain of events, but nobody knows what.

    It’s precisely what we all wait for, but our “Literal Hitler” can’t even decide whether face masks are good or bad.

    It might be good to keep in mind that the people who are psychotic in all this are the BLM people, which raises the question of where they go from insanity. The chances are pretty good that leaving them to each other, with any necessary defensive behavior to protect ourselves, will see them disintegrate into ineffectiveness. I’m pretty sure that the sane people of Seattle and Portland figured out a long time ago how to stay safe and are filing insurance claims for property damage. Then they sit back and let the crap stink.

    • Replies: @Franz
    , @paranoid goy
  59. @J Adelmen

    It would take (((a guy like this))) to take the position of an anti-white racist.

  60. Emslander says:
    @Priss Factor

    Defund the police, and let rich yuppies be at the mercy of the mob that they claim to love so much.

    The liberal white St. Louis couple taught everyone how NOT to handle a dangerous situation. In the future, the liberals with guns will simply wait inside for the mob to get up onto the porches of their mansions and kill as many of them as possible, until the mob disperses.

    Waving unloaded guns around will just get you charged as a criminal by the Soros DA. I’d rather face a prosecution claiming self-defense as a legal justification for homicide.

  61. major p's says:

    In south Warwickshire here in the UK, somebody dared to spraypaint…’White Lived Matter’ on a housing estate wall. It was treated as a hate crime with a full investigation into the ‘disturbing and serious matter’ currently underway. (Using valuable Police time).

    The police here are so thick and such sheep they will just do as they are told without questioning it as are most people employed by the Government. Nobody dares to stand up and even question these idiots.

    How have we got here and how can we get people to see how stupid they are being. Kanye West is running for president, how can he when he is held back by institutional racism? Just unreal, I am so sick of this shit.

  62. gotmituns says:

    When we use “hate speech,” we should always be careful to let our hateful slurs be tasteful towards the people[s] we’re talking too or about. After all, we’re representatives of our family and we don’t want people to think of us as crude.

  63. @wakeupscreaming

    Not only is DuckDuckGo Jewish owned, its servers are in Israel. It’s even more kosher than Google. Yandex (Russia) and Startpage (Netherlands) are both safer alternatives.

  64. @KenH

    One of Alex Linder’s best maxims is that the left acts like anything they don’t like is de facto illegal (even though it’s perfectly legal).

    So why are the police responding and the FBI investigating? Shouldn’t they tell anyone complaining about these flyers to piss off? And can’t all those people sacked and censured for this get themselves reinstated and compensated in the courts?

    If you read enough current events left wing politicians routinely refer to “hate speech” like it’s a legal category and suggesting it’s not protected by the 1st amendment.

    But are you sure you won’t be prosecuted for it even in the USA? They even arrest cops for defacing BLM propaganda, after secretly placing cameras to entrap any who actively express disagreement. Try spitting on a BLM poster while you’re being filmed and see what happens? Has the constitution defended anyone?

    • Replies: @KenH
  65. At the end of the day, the bullshit about White Privilege and White Supremacy boils down to the central uniting feature of the Diversity. Resentment of White Competence.

  66. @Usura

    Blacks and Whites are South African and North American pseudo racial concepts.

    Europe: ethnicity/nationality/ancestry.

  67. Anonymous[380] • Disclaimer says:
    @J Adelmen

    What a delightfully jewish opinion.

  68. Anonymous[191] • Disclaimer says:
    @J Adelmen

    But Jewish privilege is OK, right? Rule No. 9 of Rabbi Susan Talve’s “10 Rules for Engagement for White Jews Joining the #BlackLivesMatter Movement” begins:

    9. Use your privilege to amplify the voices of those who have less.
    Show up to #BlackLivesMatter rallies with signs of solidarity from the Jewish community.

    https://www.truah.org/resources/10-rules-for-engagement-for-white-jews-joining-the-blacklivesmatter-movement/

    A little research of Jewish publications provides ample evidence that Antifa in America comes down to Jews paying for street violence against Whites. Some of the recent video shows a pack of middle-aged Jews in a car handing out bricks in the midst of the rioting and another a little geek in black, like you perhaps, paying black teens to vandalize. Was it the case that up to the George Floyd riots Antifa was an arm of Hillel? C’mon, take credit and stop generalizing since you’re so sure your people can turn America into another killing fields like Russia was a century ago.

  69. @J Adelmen

    “White people are evil” is just a meme to get into their pants. conveniently directed at the same gender as the user. The Rise of Karen coincided with the rise of female POC journos. “white men bad” when used by white fever induced Sarah Jeong, who apparently got “ran train on by white doods” is particularly bizarre.

    The secular jew husband/brahmin wife, is just peak use of that trope – since to many asians, Jews are the Super Whites. Leave the fair jewish girls behind to date an Indian who is proud of how she is slightly fair. So you are at least a better troll than the Saira Rao poster who IRL hates white women 1000 times more than she hates white men.

    If you are real, then lmao. But I know a lot of jewish guys who date asians, while the jewish girls date white guys.

    • Replies: @The Wild Geese Howard
  70. Anonymous[399] • Disclaimer says:

    The multiculturalist utopia does not envision whites at all.

    Exactly. At the end of that rainbow is forced miscegenation and outright slaughter.

    White people who believe that their white country will turn into “another Brasil” on this suicidal trajectory are dangerously delusional. Somehow, they believe that the (((White Genocide Project))) will actually slow down and disappear as their numbers dwindle. It’s difficult to imagine anything more delusional.

  71. @follyofwar

    There is nothing controversial about Hood and Johnson unless you’re a left wing kook!
    Left wing insanity us what is controversial.

  72. @follyofwar

    The forthcoming race war will hardly be a “whimper.”

    • Replies: @The Real World
  73. The Left proves that White Lives Do Not Matter … It should be obvious to everyone!

  74. @Anonymous

    They read the like of Richard Spencer who advocate we must suffer til we … well I’m not sure what we will be then doing after the great suffering.

  75. KenH says:
    @KenH

    One of Alex Linder’s best maxims is that the left acts like anything they don’t like is de facto illegal (even though it’s perfectly legal).

    Should say that the left acts like anything they don’t like is de jure illegal or that it should be.

    If anyone puts out pro-white flyers the news will treat us to coverage showing white suburban females and cucked white males in a state of distress whining to the news crew that the pro-white flyer ruined their day and the perp(s) need to be apprehended. Then they’ll switch to officer/chief/sheriff dead serious who assures the public that 1A rights for pro-whites simply will not be tolerated and that they are doing everything in their power to track down the offenders (even though no laws were broken).

    • Agree: GazaPlanet
  76. 3g4me says:
    @paranoid goy

    @35 paranoid goy: That you so casually accuse a White of being ‘racist’ shows you’re not merely paranoid, but probably not a ‘goy’ either. Further confirmed by your use of the term ‘Joose.’ Stop larping as merely a self-abnegating White, and fly your chosen flag openly. Whatever your biology, you’re pushing pusillanimous poison.

    • Replies: @paranoid goy
  77. Realist says:

    As long as dumbass White people allow and abet their own genocide…it will continue.

  78. GeeBee says:
    @J Adelmen

    We will make America Great for the very first time.

    In other news, the USA Ministry of Plenty has announced that the weekly chocolate ration is to be increased from 70 gms to 40 gms…

    • LOL: anti_barabas_ite, American Citizen 2.0
  79. Realist says:
    @Just another serf

    We are surrounded by very dangerous people. The most dangerous among them are those white people who are either “allies” in this nascent genocide, or those who are oblivious to what is plainly in front of them.

    Very astute. I have said many times on this blog that…The first to be dealt with, when the SHTF, must be the anti-white Whites.

    • Replies: @Goddard
  80. American Citizen 2.0 says:
    @sonofman

    Your interpretation of race comes from a highly politicized post-world war II globalist perspective where some elites in the Western World tried to push this notion that we are all the same somehow and that past concepts of race were merely political categories. To see that various populations can be very easily delineated in terms of what we call (granted somewhat unscientifically) “race” look at 23 and me results. In every case, genetic tests can tell you almost certainly where your DNA comes from on earth and as a result of that various statistical generalizations will almost certainly be true of you based on that. For example, sickle cell anemia will be more prevalent for people from a certain part of the world. The clearest and most comprehensive discussion of that topic recently written out for lay readers is Charles Murray’s book Human Biodiversity. It’s an excellent book. All of the genetic evidence uncovered over the last 40 years or so point very clearly to the facts that “Europeans” mainly introgressed with Neaderthals whereas Africans introgressed with another type of humanoid entirely. Search for info about the so called “Ghost Population of Africa” using something other than google (because google suppresses information about such topics). Point being, we are all “interbred” with different species basically and as a result of that we come out quite a bit different in all sorts of ways. Add to that fact the evolutionary pressures that led certain groups of us to have various attributes like impulse control and you start to see very clear explanations for why big populations with similar characteristics seem to behave in similar ways.

    All of this scientific material has been suppressed and repackaged by Communists and Leftists in America in terms of “sub-culture” and “politics” rather than genetics. So people who are largely of African descent are told that they are just like wypipo but that they have a different “culture” that doesn’t involve using time, or doing math, or having nuclear families, or reading. This is a kind of compassionate fairy tale that has developed in the US to shield young black people from obvious facts. I don’t necessarily disagree with doing that for purely humanitarian reasons.

    But then why would anyone care about all of this? Because the globalist elite are basically forcing us to live with a foreign population of humanoid creatures who lack the ability to control their violent impulses, cannot be taught to read and write in most cases, and do not grasp abstract concepts or logical deduction. I am fine with Black people turning the tables and calling wypipo the foreign population of humanoid creatures but then the irony is that if Africans started doing that systematically, we would gladly never choose to integrate with you. The only push for integration of these two radically different types of “people shaped animals” that we all are comes from Jews basically. They are trying to breed us into a new mulatto race by forcing us to live together.

    That none of this can ever be said publicly or discussed in a mainstream media environment is why it must seem utterly baffling to non-white people why some white people are so adamant about these topics. Non-white people generally do not know anything about this stuff because the information is so taboo and suppressed. But once you go down the rabbit hole and learn about it, you will almost certainly agree.

    None of which should be read to imply that white people are “superior” to other kinds of people. That “superiority” idea is a lie that Jewish controlled media uses to enforce the taboo against these ideas and keep people from exploring them. I don’t think we are superior. We are just completely different because of our introgression with Neanderthals and the evolutionary pressures that shaped our brains. Many of us do not want to be bred into another species. I think if Africans really saw what the globalists are doing at the level of population genetics they would object to all of it too but right now the huge sums of money and the standard of living the European West are so titillating that everyone on earth is scrambling to join in.

    I could go on but I will leave it at that. Point is this: if you are not white you will almost never hear a friendly, fair conversation about these topics because the Jewish controlled media does not want you to know these things. But you can discover them from credible, scientific, sincere writers if you do the research. In the end it’s like trying to get Grizzly bears to mate with Polar bears. I want there to be both grizzly bears and polar bears. I don’t want them to be combined into one new type of bear where the old types of bears disappear and go extinct. I don’t think either type of bear is superior. They evolved to live in different types of environments. They are just different kinds of bears that should be preserved as such.

    • Replies: @throtler
    , @Sam J.
  81. kikz says:
    @Tono Bungay

    ” I think that is a good part of the reason why the “progressive” left is so hysterical, so crazy and so violent today, because it is trying desperately to prove something that at heart it disagrees with.”

    y, it’s called … cognitive dissonance….. insanity induced by utter denial of reality.

  82. @Johnny Smoggins

    Not only is DuckDuckGo Jewish owned, its servers are in Israel. It’s even more kosher than Google. Yandex (Russia) and Startpage (Netherlands) are both safer alternatives.

    There is even an article on Haaretz.

    Startpage is fine but by they openly admit to outsourcing content from Google. People with the relevant skills need to come up with alternatives.

  83. @Anonymous

    > “the remaining Whites in South Africa have been placed on the genocide watch”

    In response, White Euro-America males (who fapped, drank beer, and watched sports for 54+ years while feminists-PC-SJW-BLM-etc. did the Mexican Hat Dance on their testicles) do nothing.

    They cluck like impotent hens while white SA males are murdered.

    The apathy from people like Rutte the Prime Minister of the Netherlands is more appalling. The same applies to other countries where Afrikaans speakers have roots like Belgium (Flanders), Germany and even late Afrikaner nationalist Eugène Terre’Blanche’s ancestral homeland France.

    For those of British descent the part Turkish jester who runs the UK is more interested in importing millions of Hong Kong Chinese and Pajeets.

    • Replies: @Commentator Mike
  84. @Mario Partisan

    “mandatory Diversity quotas in each and every sector.”

    The NBA

    MLB

    NFL

    WNBA

    NCAA football

    NCAA basketball

    weave stores…

    • LOL: American Citizen 2.0
  85. Truth3 says:

    The War Between the Races started long ago.

    Jews declared War on everyone else. Arabs, Europeans, Slavs, etc.

    Jews use the US Military to destroy the Arabs, because they are the ones that best know what Jews are.

    Blacks, Asians, Hispanics, are used by the Jews to destroy the White Euro populations.

    Why?

    Because Jews always have used the least dangerous enemy to kill the most capable enemy.

    King David (((That Joo Bastard))) used the tactic relentlessly.

    Guess what?

    When Whites have been destroyed as a race, the Jews will move to better subjugate the next target.

    • Replies: @denk
  86. a nice run of

    Its

    OK

    To Be

    Straight.

    posters on campus and watch the reaction .

    Its

    Ok

    To Be

    Christian.

    lets all try it in our neighborhoods, report back for data sharing!

  87. @J Adelmen

    Hey ‘Adelmen’, my good mensch.

    ““It’s okay to be white,” appears to be a literal, or denotative, message, but when we read it in context — against the backdrop of institutionalized euro-centrism”

    Was the DeWolfe family or Aaron Lopez white? Were they ‘euro centric’? Given that they were the major actors in the trans atlantic slave trade that brought black slaves to North America, shouldn’t a proper redress of black grievances include a proper examination of Jewish supremacism and Jewish privilege?

  88. “In every field of human endeavor, he that is first must perpetually live in the white glare of publicity. Whether the leadership be vested in a man or in a manufactured product, emulation and envy are ever at work. In art, in music, in industry, the reward and punishment are always the same. The reward is widespread recognition; the punishment, fierce denial and detraction. When a man’s work becomes a standard for the whole world, it also becomes a target for the shafts of the envious few. If his work is mediocre, he will be left severely alone—if he achieves a masterpiece, it will set a million tongue a-wagging. Jealousy does not protrude its forked tongue at the artist who produces a commonplace painting. Whatsoever you write, or paint, or play, or sing, or build, no one will strive to surpass or to slander you unless your work be stamped with the seal of genius. Long, long after a great work or a good work has been done, those who are disappointed or envious, continue to cry out that it cannot be done. Spiteful little voices in the domain of art were raised against our own Whistler as a mountebank, long after the big would have acclaimed him its greatest artistic genius. Multitudes flocked to Bayreuth to worship at the musical shrine of Wagner, while the little group of those whom he dethroned and displaced argued angrily that he was no musician at all. The little world continued to protest that Fulton could never build a steamboat, while the big world flocked to the river banks to see his boat steam by. The leader is assailed because he is the leader, and the effort to equal him is merely added proof of that leadership. Failing to equal or excel, the follower seeks to depreciate and to destroy—but only confirms once more the superiority of that which he strives to supplant. There is nothing new in this. It is as old as the world and as old as human passions—envy, fear, greed, ambition, and the desire to surpass. And it all avails nothing. If the leader truly leads, he remains—the leader. Master-poet, master-painter, master-workman, each in his turn is assailed, and each holds his laurels through the ages. That which is good or great makes itself known, no matter how loud the clamor of denial. That which deserves to live—lives.”

    Copyright Cadillac Motor Company (1915 ad)

    • Thanks: American Citizen 2.0
  89. Wally says:
    @sonofman

    BTW, black Africans sold THEIR black slaves, otherwise there would have been no black slavery.

    • Replies: @Sya Beerens
  90. Good video but no mention of what Ben Shapiro and Bari Weiss are. It’s not good enough to name the individuals when they act in service to a shared identity, and it ain’t Eskimo.

    LET THE REVOLUTION EAT ITS OWN CHILDREN


    • Thanks: Agent76, Miro23
    • Replies: @Miro23
  91. @Amerimutt Golems

    For those of British descent the part Turkish jester who runs the UK is more interested in importing millions of Hong Kong Chinese and Pajeets.

    Yes, Brexit was a disappointment. But staying in the EU would have been a disappointment. Everything will always be a disappointment as long and the people don’t rise up and eliminate the elites that rule over them in their name but against them.

  92. Agent76 says:

    Feb 22, 2020 Ayn Rand – Racism is the Lowest Form of Collectivism

    Ayn Rand identifies the true nature of racism and the steps that can be taken against it.

    • Replies: @Astuteobservor II
  93. geokat62 says:
    @sonofman

    “Race”, is a theory with little or no scientific basis and is being used to guilt- pressure societies towards acceptance of alternative and dubious indoctrination. At the moment, the whole World seems to be going postal over mythical narratives, and anything pertaining to “Race” is certainly one of them.

    So true…

    The Naturalization Act of 1790… was a law of the United States Congress that set the first uniform rules for the granting of United States citizenship by naturalization. The law limited naturalization to “free white person[s] … of good character”,…

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naturalization_Act_of_1790

  94. @KenH

    One of Alex Linder’s best maxims

    I love this game.

    “Killing Jews isn’t an extreme position, it’s a moderate one. An extreme position would be shooting them with silver bullets, driving stakes through their hearts, and cutting off their heads and stuffing them with holy wafers.”

    Forever in contention with this gem: “For every Jew, a book.”

  95. @Afterthought

    I agree the ultimate (and best) answer to our struggles might be to split the USA.

    But, not a chance that it would happen even in the next 4 years. It would be a huge move and the population has to be psychologically conditioned towards that idea. It isn’t even a remote thought in most American minds, at the present.

    I even have an idea of how to reasonably do it. Three countries:
    — The NE and Mid-Atlantic
    — Calif and Pac West
    — The rest of America (Colorado would need to revert to its conservative roots and we’d just have to figure out what to do about Illinois. Sell it to Canada? Lol…..)
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    RE: Trump and the FauciFlu — I can’t find too much fault with his moves on this because I think they triangulated him. Just as we thought we were headed out of this a couple months ago, “they” appear to have re-seeded it (in conservative states, at that!) AND have further ramped their fake death count tactics. I think DJT saw the writing on the wall (“they” designed it and have the upper hand b/c of that) so, he’s rolling with as best he can in a re-election year.)

    • Replies: @American Citizen 2.0
  96. KenH says:
    @Commentator Mike

    So why are the police responding and the FBI investigating? Shouldn’t they tell anyone complaining about these flyers to piss off?

    Yes they should and there are still a few honest police departments around the nation that admit pro-white leafletting is legal. The FBI has absolutely no right to get involved but when they do it’s to intimidate and embarrass the pro-white activist and put them on an illegal list of “white domestic extremists” that we all know they’re compiling.

    But are you sure you won’t be prosecuted for it even in the USA?

    The can’t prosecute on 1st amendment grounds so they use other pretexts. Consider that couple in California that defaced a black lives matter mural that was illegally painted on the street. The BLM activists who painted those words on the street did not have permission from the city and committed vandalism, but instead the white couple who painted over it are being charged by the black DA with a hate crime…..against a mural. We’ve entered Orwellian territory.

    The strategy by the radical left is to use their allies in police depts. DA’s offices and the FBI to bring bogus charges against right of center white American and see what they can get a court to go along with. This is textbook tyranny.

    • Thanks: Commentator Mike
  97. Miro23 says:
    @Priss Factor

    Thanks for the video – Ref. the New High Priests

    “Instead, a new consensus has emerged in the press, but perhaps especially at this paper: that truth isn’t a process of collective discovery, but an orthodoxy already known to an enlightened few whose job is to inform everyone else.”

    Bari Weiss – Resignation letter (from the New York Times).


  98. USA1943 says:

    What is amazing is the high percentage of Whites who are hateful of other Whites in a extremely hysterical way,it is bizarre that so many Whites are so into Ethnomasochism I don’t understand it and it ranges from loser types to multimillionaires in high positions, example look at the Democratic Primaries Beto O’Rourke, Elizabeth Warren (Who claimed another ethnicity for advantage) to the College (And even K-12 Teachers) and Students (Yes they are being taught it, but I would have thought certainly at the College Age/level when teachers say something clearly wrong they would dismiss it) I hear many Whites on TV say for example, I can’t wait until Whites are a Minority in the USA, I hope I live to see it, are there any examples of multiracial countries where the group in power has been fair to groups not in power (Other than the recent development of leaders in White Countries who screw over other Whites?) kind of like these Anti-White White people are pathologically altruistic. It is Bizarre and it is recent, JFK, Truman etc. never were Anti-White, Anti-American, Pro Communism etc. It is bizarre.

  99. Which of these diametrically opposed positions is true?

    The answer is: whichever position is backed by force.

    The first rioters should’ve been shot with rubber bullets once and live rounds after that. The National Guard should’ve been sent everywhere with standing orders to shoot looters and rioters. Mayors and even governors who aided looters should’ve been arrested. Someone will always be in charge. If it’s not the Authorities then whom?

    Misplaced White mercy must be replaced with White fury.

    • Agree: throtler
    • Replies: @Anon
    , @Anonymous
  100. @Digital Samizdat

    I agree, this is a very effective tactic. It exposes irrationality on the other side. And humor is always a plus.

    When I called Western Connecticut U. to ask why being white was not OK and Muslims aren’t allowed to be right about anything, the PR guy sounded embarrassed about the whole thing: https://youtu.be/vMkrP0MPfHs

    • Replies: @Biff
  101. White people really need to stand for themselves.

    When did whites become such pushovers in their own countries?

    Where did the gun touting guys at the state houses go when covid was in the news?

    Don’t take racism against whites like it is a given.

    All lives matter.

    Human lives matter.

  102. babu says:

    What he meant to say is that it is o.k. to be white non-Jew.

  103. Anonymous[339] • Disclaimer says:
    @alt right moderate

    It’s interesting that woke, anti-white thinking tends to be strongest in the richest white countries.

    It’s very interesting. I suspect that it is crucial. Fact: industrialization hasn’t been good for the industrialized populations _when considered as populations_. It has given the individual people in that population a longer life than most want (so they throw much of it away with psychoactive drugs), the economic ability to have more children (and a thriving industry to destroy the children they do have – imposition of a very large cost per child for simple rearing, social services, destructive education, drugs, hostile POC at school, artificial public opinion in the mass media, deadly psychiatric services, police who will not let them play without adults present, and ever so much more), the ability to marry and live in peace (which is also destroyed, quite deliberately), the ability to eat as much as one wants to (and grow obese), the ability to be employed (although not promoted, and women who are employed cannot, in practice, have healthy children) and on and on. You get the idea, and it should be obvious why White population is dropping.

    I suggest that White people do not like the industrialized society that (a) their ancestors built, (b) they live in, and (c) is killing them and their children. I further suggest that White people are reluctant to say that industrial society is killing them. It is a matter of pride, Whites are generally proud people, even if their main pride is that they have no pride — are meek.

    [MORE]

    White people may be reluctant to say that industrial society is killing them, but they are not at all reluctant to destroy industrial society. The 1964 Civil rights act essentially destroyed industrial society within the US — we’re about half way through the destruction. It essentially required, legally, that money previously invested in keeping plants modern (countering depreciation with new equipment purchases) be invested in immediate consumption — rather strangely called “welfare”, or possibly “defense”. It also commanded that investments in new industries be diverted to immediate consumption.
    This command was not immediately or entirely effective. However, here we are in 2020 and the West’s industrial plant can no longer support the Western population, which is what the riots are about. The White rioters need jobs and want to start a revolution (like that of the 1960s) that will given them jobs. Much the same with the POC rioters.
    None of the rioters is at all disturbed by any need to keep the West or the US capable of supporting itself economically or militarily. The “White privilege” described so well by the Smithsonian’s web page is a description of the mental abilities needed to support an industrial state — no more, no less. The rioters don’t want White privilege because they don’t want the industrial state. No wonder about that — the industrial state is killing them, educating them only in tearing down the industrial state, which tearing down they won’t survive.

    So we’re in a bit of dilemma here.
    Lemma 1: We keep the industrial state. The Whites die off, then almost everybody else starves.
    Lemma 2: We reject the industrial state. Almost everybody starves.

    That’s why things seem so crazy: there isn’t any solution. Lemma 2 is marginally preferable for the White population, but Whites won’t admit verbally that their society is killing them, and even if they did Lemma 2 is not the sort of solution you’d brag about implementing.

    Isn’t games theory fun?

    • Replies: @dfordoom
    , @Sam J.
  104. haha says:
    @Franz

    “Just wait till November, Racists will get to know what is right and what is wrong.”

    Oh, My God, you are clearly salivating at the prospect of doing all sorts of stuff to people whose opinions you dislike. What a Great Republic you shall create, where it shall be law to believe that water freezes when boiled, when thought police vigorously prosecute every crime against political incorrectness, and where we perpetually have to look over our shoulders before opening our mouths.

    • Replies: @InnerCynic
    , @R.C.
    , @Franz
  105. cassandra says:
    @Miro23

    Under Bolshevism any dissent was violently suppressed (including workers) with millions of people “liquidated” or transported to a network of work/death camps (Gulag) spread across the Soviet Union.

    I think your description of our current political left as neo-Bolshevism is spot-on. I’m not sure that the ideologies are the same, but I agree that their behaviors and tactics are nearly identical.

    While working my way through Shulze-Rhonof’s book, “1939 – The War That Had Many Fathers”, I was struck by his comment on p. 159:

    “Roosevelt …feels called upon to export America’s values to the world, if necessary, by wars. That liberal-democratic nationalism of many Americans is parallel to the Marxist-Leninist internationalism of the same time in this regard: both are convinced that they represent the welfare of the people, and a hidden preparedness for war is intrinsic to both.”

    Seeing liberal democracy identified as an unquestioned, fanatically utopian credo is an eye-opener. I’m still working out the implications, but this perspective goes a long way in explaining why the cancel culture is so averse to free speech. The entire liberal-democratic agenda, including the EU, R2P, suppressing nationalism, destroying cultures in the name of democracy, and cancelling individuals in the name of human rights, are all rolled together into a propagandistic conglomeration of unquestionable politically-correct emotional states. It’s only real argument is that there’s something wrong with you as a human being if you don’t buy in.

    Funny; I don’t feel guilty.

    • Replies: @Robert Dolan
  106. Neuday says:
    @anonymous

    Why do the Jews hate the innocent Christ?

    I suggest reading some E. Michael Jones. Perhaps The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit.

    • Replies: @anonymous
  107. Anon[363] • Disclaimer says:
    @Sick of Orcs

    Finally a man who knows the deal.

    Thank you, Sir.

    • Thanks: Sick of Orcs
  108. @follyofwar

    Luckily, I read Johnson’s “Truth, Justice and a Nice White Country” and “The White Nationalist Manifesto” before they were scrubbed by Amazon.

    Thanks for the reading suggestions, Mr. FollyofWar. I have not read these yet, but I look forward to doing so. Collecting “banned books” or other hard to find books is one of my hobbies.

    Thank you.

  109. This reminds me of a comic strip I read a while back that sums this up nicely –

    (It’s got 6 panels, so make sure you swipe)

    The left’s hatred of the normal and the healthy is pathological and outright unnatural.

  110. @KenH

    These days most college campuses would freak out if someone put up notices saying “It’s OK to be OK”.

    The lunatics are running the asylum.

    • Replies: @Franklin Ryckaert
  111. @cassandra

    Yes, we are facing the very same Bolsheviks that the German’s had to fight.

    In fact, it is the very same Antifa, right down to their insignia.

    This is Weimar 2.0 with the added obstacle of anarcho-tyranny that prevents us from defending
    ourselves while the (((left))) destroys our beloved nation.

    • Replies: @InnerCynic
  112. American Citizen 2.0 says:
    @The Real World

    Creating a separate country wouldn’t work for the same way Rhodesia and South Africa didn’t work. Once you have built up some nice towns, half a billion people will cross the border illegally, create “townships”, act like they lived there forever, and then get every nation in Europe to completely undermine your economy through sanctions because you are rayciss. In other words, their own side of the division will spiral into crap and they will move back over to your side of the division claiming you gave them the dumpy side of the partition.

    I think we are kind of stuck with everyone here although gated communities surrounded by vast slums seems to be the direction we are headed so it turns out the same either way.

  113. @Justvisiting

    Try : “It’s OK to be normal”.

  114. Anonymous[191] • Disclaimer says:
    @Sick of Orcs

    Of course you’re right about warnings followed by using live ammo against the frontline arsonists and throwers, which raises the question of who advised DJT to stand down so that he would get blamed for America’s cities burning rather than the perps themselves. It’s also illuminating that the Obama Pentagon’s costumed bureaucrats–who but for the unearned costume are interchangeable with their confederates at DOJ and the State Dept–defected in unison, meaning they were following orders from some group outside the WH.

    Because in the normal course of things the Obama Pentagon’s Dem operatives genuflect before the neocon/neolibs whom these martinets’ record proves they serve without reservation, it raises the question whether this insurrection can be laid at the feet of Israel and its American fifth column. This isn’t far-fetched since Foreign Affairs recently gloated that Israel has been in secret negotiations with China for years now, behind America’s back, for the express purpose of replacing the US with China. Given that inevitability, is it now time to throw America on the ash heap of history as Netanyahu promised Israel would do when as much of the Yinon Plan could be coaxed out of US subjugation?

    • Replies: @Sick of Orcs
  115. The ‘Okay to be White’ posters are meant as pure sarcasm as evidence by the reactions they receive. Just as the hypocritical irony of BLM, in the end, doesnt really mean what it says.

  116. @Robert Dolan

    It doesnt prevent you but it sure as hell would like you and others to believe so. Man up! Start organizing. If those leftist rat bags can be so well organized and efficient why cant people in the name of defending their own civilization do less?

    • Replies: @cassandra
  117. Marylou says:
    @Charlemagne

    Yep, we all bleed red.

    So do cows, pigs, dogs and cats….

  118. @haha

    For a moment there I thought you were describing the way things are now… cancel culture and all… silly me

  119. @Wally

    tried your link, but got a host error message . .

    The origin web server does not have a valid SSL certificate

    so apparently, free speech is intermittent over there. Anyways, your comment is non sequitur . . I was simply suggesting that the concept of the experiment is flawed.

  120. @American Citizen 2.0

    Yup–many folks around here like to forget–this is an _international_ war on whites, an _international_ problem…..

    • Replies: @USA1943
  121. cassandra says:

    Force the Left to say “It’s not okay to be white.” Force them to say “White lives don’t matter.” And make sure that everyone knows it. Also, be sure to take down names. 

    Greg Johnson’s analysis is spot-on, but his strategy reflects a dangerously naive but widespread mindset in political attitudes.

    This might be good advice if our culture still supported the paradigm of public discourse, wherein members of contending parties advocate their views with more or less free speech (like the good old days, if there ever were such.)

    We’re failing to incorporate the fact that this paradigm has been almost completely overthrown. Major areas of the battlefield of public discourse have been lost to the propaganda of the elitist opposition. The fight is now no longer a debate, but a rear-guard defense of free speech by individuals (probably a majority), against a propaganda onslaught by a corporate-media elite and their followers.

    The principle of the free press has also been distorted beyond recognition. Anti-SJW views have practically disappeared from mainstream print and cable. The entire MSM (Fox, perhaps, excepted) will first ignore or marginalize such ideas, demonize anyone who might become effective, and present fabrications as “expert opinion” when necessary. At the NYT, the firing of Bennett and demotion of Jim Dao for merely allowing Sen. Cotton to speak his mind, and the resignation letter of Bari Weiss, have confirmed what we already knew. With these examples, how can Doug seriously recommend that anyone who needs a job for their family and/or livelihood risk speaking out?

    The battle has long since moved to the more uncontrollable internet. The battle here began in earnest in 2017. Free expression now runs the risk of being banned. Posters who are careless, or who just have thoughtless close acquaintances, can be fired from a physical job if it’s discovered that said acquaintance has mis-spoken.

    Fortunately, the internet is some way from being shutdown, and as Ron has reported, people are reacting by reading free sites. The obvious strategy of supporting marginalized views, however, relies on the presence of energetic providers who maintain such sites in the first place. As long as we can speak and explore the truth somewhere the fight is very much alive.

    • Agree: American Citizen 2.0
  122. @BigLennyAcolyte

    But I know a lot of jewish guys who date asians

    There are a ton of Jewish guy/chubby cutish Chinese woman marriages popping up out there.

  123. @Johnny Smoggins

    Not only is DuckDuckGo Jewish owned, its servers are in Israel. It’s even more kosher than Google. Yandex (Russia) and Startpage (Netherlands) are both safer alternatives.

    Qwant based in France is worth a look.

    No, it is not perfect, but it is certainly less bad than Google or DuckDuckGo.

  124. USA1943 says:
    @Justvisiting

    Not a war, no one is fighting back.

  125. As E. Michael Jones observed, Whites are protestants who do not practice their faith

    • Replies: @Exile
  126. @USA1943

    are there any examples of multiracial countries where the group in power has been fair to groups not in power

    The only example I can think of is Singapore, and their approach to being “fair” to groups not in power is very much strict, tough love from the state versus the indulgent, kid gloves approach used in the US and Europe.

  127. cassandra says:
    @InnerCynic

    Man up! Start organizing. If those leftist rat bags can be so well organized and efficient why can’t people in the name of defending their own civilization do less?

    You mean like Charlottesville?

    To answer your question, because the opposition controls the media: it’s quite the stretch to closely watch James Fields’ behavior and conclude that it was premeditated, or that police action did not instigate violence, yet today, that the events of Charlottesville were a consequence of white supremacy is a foregone conclusion, thanks to media control and censorship.

    Small but politically-clever actions, like painting over BLM signs in New York, or petitioning Redwood City to allow painting MAGA 2020 in the street, seem to be more successful. Because we are so many, perhaps such death-by-a-thousand-cuts attacks would be more effectively uncontrollable. But an unconventional strategy of opposition needs development.

    We are opposing something very much like Stalinism, and they are coming for us, if not in the night then in the day (ask Tucker Carlson).

    • Agree: Robert Dolan
    • Replies: @Justvisiting
    , @InnerCynic
  128. anonymous[299] • Disclaimer says:
    @Neuday

    Why do the Jews hate the innocent Christ?

    I suggest reading some E. Michael Jones. Perhaps The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit.

    It was a rhetorical question. I know the answer. The promise of the jew religion to the jew people is the subjugation of the non_Jew. Christ was the son of god. He had all the power of God. Christ had the power to do as the Jews had expected of their messiah. But he did not. He chose to die instead. And for Christs refusal, he, his children, and all that praises him are hated by the Jews. Do you hate those who hate the innocent who did no wrong?? I do.

  129. jlc says:

    One of the comments from your cited link to keep ” “It’s okay to be white” constantly in the news” said to just post plain white stickers with the one bolded word WHITE printed on them. I thought this to be absolutely brilliant. Would that be a hate crime ?

  130. Exile says:
    @paranoid goy

    This is Jewish concern-trolling and White-shaming.

    1) Deep concern over Jews being despised;

    2) appeal against supposed moral hypocrisy;

    3) White-shaming with the idea that Whites, uniquely of all races, are obligated to take the supposedly morally superior deracinated position while everyone else enjoys ethnocentrism;

    4) White ethnocentrism = hatred.

    The proper White response to the false dilemma you seek to box us in with is:

    We’re not concerned with being “worse” or “better” than everyone else who asserts ethnic identity.

    We don’t buy your moral framework – it’s a rigged game where we always lose and everyone else always wins.

    We don’t need your moral sanction or anyone else’s to assert our identity.

    We demand the same standing every other race claims – because we exist. No further justification necessary.

    And we will not allow ourselves to be abused, dispossessed and ultimately exterminated just because you demand it.

    • Agree: American Citizen 2.0, 3g4me, throtler
    • Replies: @geokat62
  131. @cassandra

    Let a million lawsuits bloom….that is a good opening gambit…..as applicable, sue anyone and everyone who has damaged your property, or supported the folks who damaged your property, and the authorities who refused to protect your property etc.

    Sue the employers who fired you over speech.

    Sue the school system that tries to indoctrinate your kids to hate you…..

    etc….

    If only 5% of the lawsuits are successful, the resulting chaos will bring the cultural Marxists to their knees–begging _us_ for mercy.

    • Replies: @cassandra
    , @Robert Dolan
  132. Exile says:
    @Mick Jagger gathers no Mosque

    E. Michael Jones doesn’t believe there is such a thing as White identity. He has no place in this conversation.

  133. Again, the problem of failing to name the source:

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-8537583/JOHN-GRAY-not-exaggeration-compare-methods-new-woke-movement-Maos-Red-Guards.html

    Red Guards were energized by Mao.

    What is behind Cancel Culture? Jewish supremacist power. Is Zionism getting canceled? Are people saying Palestinian Lives Matter? Of course not. They are not even going after Neocons.

    No, even though some Jews have gotten affected in the melee, most of the hatred has been against whites, conservatism, Western Civ, Christianity, and etc.

    Anyone who mentions Cancel Culture without naming the Jewish Power behind it is as phony as those who condemn the Cultural Revolution without mentioning Mao. Indeed, this is what happened in China after Mao’s death. Deng and his cronies chose to dump most of the blame on the Gang of Four than on Mao even though the Gang was only serving Mao. So, Mao is still sacred in China.

    Cancel Culture is just gang-of-four and red guards in service to Jewish Power.

  134. R.C. says:
    @haha

    I detect that your post misreads the prior posts to which it refers.
    I would suggest that you should stop and take the time to reread that post of ‘Franz’ which brought you to post what you did, along with reading posts made subsequent to yours.
    R.C.
    P.s., (To ALL!) Generally, (a point I’ve made before) people should always declare (or somehow otherwise make clear, when they are engaging in satire, or are being sarcastic, facetious, et al.*
    *Usually, a mere footnote (*) will suffice to preserve the humor and the point.
    RC

  135. Art says:

    Clearly, white culture was good for humanity. White culture has driven mankind forward.

    Since the advent of European Western Christian culture, 400 years ago – the number of non-white people has grown by the billions.

    People all over the globe want Western science, goods, dress, and music.

    Was there bad – of course – but the good overshadowed the negative – the proof is in the pudding.

    The problem today, is that the non-whites want a bigger share of the West’s bounty.

    Bounty is created. The only way to accomplish that is to be MORE Western – not less.

  136. Franz says:
    @haha

    “Just wait till November, Racists will get to know what is right and what is wrong.”

    Oh, My God, you are clearly salivating at the prospect of doing all sorts of stuff to people whose opinions you dislike.

    I think you are responding to the post below mine. I mentioned nothing about November.

    • Replies: @haha
    , @Franz
  137. cassandra says:
    @Justvisiting

    I like your idea of legal resistance; in fact, I think resistance is a better meme than Man Up!, given our predicament.

    Resist, resist… where have I heard that before? I wonder if we could coopt that as OUR motto?

    Resist the SJW!

    • Replies: @DrWatson
  138. Franz says:
    @Emslander

    It might be good to keep in mind that the people who are psychotic in all this are the BLM people, which raises the question of where they go from insanity.

    I think you are right because the old prestige press is starting to treat them as a liability.

    The idea these people represent something real and organic in political life is a fiction rapidly being erased every time they make a move. They overplayed their hand when they thought non-ideological people would find their behavior excusable.

    In the same way the antiwar hippies of the 70s infuriated the voters enough to elect Reagan, the new version didn’t learn from their political ancestors’ blunders.

  139. Truth3 says:

    The overwhelming majority of advances of Technology & Culture & Civilization are due to…

    … The White European Race.

    The overwhelming majority of violent crimes, and rapes & murders in the USA are due to…

    … The Black African Race.

    The overwhelming majority of financial crime (theft, fraud, etc.) are due to…

    … The (((Tribe))).

    Clear enough?

  140. @Whitewolf

    “The pre war period of NS rule needs to be looked at in isolation much more than it has been.”

    That period posed the choice directly to the Germans: Do you want multicultural communism to overrun you and your culture, or do you go with NS. Lenin lived in Munich on the same street as Hitler on Schliesheimerstrasse years apart of course. Kurt Eisner led the Munich centered Bavarian Soviet Republic (Räterepublik Baiern) short lived for sure, but nonetheless Commie Marxist. AH and NS saved Europe from Communism and it should be kissing his ass, instead of vilifying him and shooshing even discussing him in what amounts to the very first Original Cancel Culture – where do you think the idea of cancel culture came from (((afterall))).

    • Replies: @paranoid goy
  141. @Justvisiting

    Most attorneys want nothing to do with anything that resembles a white fighting back.

    I was dismissed from my job by mexican and black (and jew) superiors. Long story but I am certain my age and race had a lot to do with it. My firing was based on total fabrications.

    Anyway…..I went to four different attorneys and none of them would help me.

    I predict even more severe discrimination for whites, as the nose is using South Africa as their model for white destruction.

    I agree that we have to try to fight back in any way that we can, and if you have the ability to file lawsuits by all means do it.

    It is encouraging to see the BLM “murals” being painted over repeatedly. This indicates that at least some people are not completely brain dead.

    • Agree: AceDeuce
    • Replies: @American Citizen 2.0
  142. American Citizen 2.0 says:
    @Robert Dolan

    Robert I am sorry to hear that happened to you. I had a similar experience and it’s pretty galling. The way I coped with the real feelings of anger I felt was I focused more on making sure I had a clearer understanding of the team I would be working with looking for a new job. When I was young I thought, somewhat naively, that I could get along with everyone and that I could help anyone complete assigned tasks. As I got older and worked with more people I learned that actually some people just maliciously want to get other people fired.

    • Agree: Robert Dolan
  143. geokat62 says:
    @Exile

    4) White ethnocentrism = hatred.

    Close. Here’s the complete formulation that motivates the activities of Jewish Supremacist Organizations (JSOs):

    ethno-nationalism = fascism= genocide

    Never Again! means the most whites can hope for is a civic-nationalist homeland… as an ethno-nationalist homeland is out of the question, except for The Chosen and non-whites (for the time being).

  144. America was built by white men. Certain self-righteous white females, along with academics, homosexuals, militant blacks, and Democratic party politicians who wouldn’t know a brick from a handsaw, want to tear the country down. These so-called intellectuals hate anyone who has built anything, They are filled with envy, and think Karl Marx proved that capitalism is awful. On the contrary, capitalism has provided the highest standard of living both in the US and in western Europe, that has ever been achieved. If capitalism is so terrible, why are there 750,000 illegal immigrants in NYC? Why didn’t they stay in the countries where they were born? Those countries don’t provide the safety net found in the US and western Europe and the Scandinavian countries.

  145. @gaston julia

    Did you miss the point of the article? In a white supremacist society, a college administrator would be AFRAID to contest the assertion that “it’s ok to be white”.

    • Agree: Robjil
  146. Biff says:
    @Kevin Barrett

    “The pranksters are more sophisticated than their targets”

    Bwaaah! The PR guy sounded like he had to take a piss the whole time, but after that I think he just let’er fly and wet his pants. That was some good/funny stuff. Thanks.

  147. @Agent76

    Do you not have opinions of your own?

    Why always spam retarded videos from youtube?

    And yes, they are 99.99% retarded.

  148. Regarding the “it is okay to be white” motion in the Australian senate: it is breathtaking how fast all the senators who backed a seemingly innocuous phrase reversed their positions and issued grovelling apologies.

    The MP who is currently Leader of the Opposition tweeted

    “It is just beyond belief that the Coalition voted for Pauline Hanson’s offensive and ridiculous Senate motion about race yesterday.”

    Nobody confronted him with the question “is it not ok to be white?”

    Of course he and the rest should be. They should be forced to agree that “it’s not ok to be white.” Then we can take a good look at our representatives and ask: who are they representing? Why are they so scared to agree that it’s ok to be a member of the largest racial contingent in Australia? A contingent that most of them belong to?

    I think we have a good sense now of who truly wields power in our society. The media and big tech can make or break most of our politicians at will.

    Pauline Hanson was regarded as a terrible racist when she first got elected. I certainly regarded her that way. Now she is one of the few who will ever speak any truth in Parliament! As a consequence, she just got banned by a major TV network- which also owns the most highly regarded newspapers in our two biggest cities. She is still a darling of the Murdoch media- because there is one priveliged “white” minority which she never criticises. I guess we have to take what we can get….

    • Replies: @Miro23
    , @DrWatson
  149. haha says:
    @Franz

    Oops, stupid me! My apologies. The post I meant to respond to was Adelman’s. I pressed the “Reply” button at the wrong point on the page.

  150. partacus says:

    great article, with a very bad ending. the race issue is lumped with the leftism, which shows why we are where we are. if an author like this gets confused about economic platforms and cannot stay focused on the survival of the race we must be doomed.
    I predict the next reaction will be fa light back to the old continent, but they will follow us there and, sadly, in 20 years the only remaining white country will be Russia. ironically, Russians do not have a white identity, they only have an ethnic identity.

  151. You misheard me, I said “It’s so gay to be white.”

  152. The real problem there is that our language has been hijacked by the crazies.

    Taken out of the context of 2020, I think pretty much everyone on the planet would agree to 3 statements — “all lives matter”, “black lives matter” and “white lives matter”.

    Yet you will not find anyone these days (except maybe someone in a different country who speaks enough English to grasp the meaning of the words without understanding the subtle meanings the statements have come to have these days) who will agree to all of them.

    You can’t say “all lives matter” without being labeled a racist for being dismissive of the special problems of black people. In other circles, you can’t say “black lives matter” without being associated with looting rioters. And almost nobody including a vast majority of white people wants to hear anything about the fact that “white lives matter”.

    A few crazies who control the media have, largely successfully, hijacked the language to make it impossible for people to even talk — and that, not any imagined genocide (be it the black genocide being imagined by many on the left or the white genocide being imagined by many on the right), is what this is really about.
    They want to make it impossible to think out of the box by taking away the language you’d need to express your ideas, and they want to make it impossible for those on the left and those on the right to talk to each other to find out that, while there certainly are disagreements, we have a common enemy (the DC tyranny) that is far worse than the “other side”‘s followers.
    They certainly manage to accomplish the latter as long as they make people believe that “all lives matter” means “I’m a white supremacist and I want to kill all people of color” and that “black lives matter” means “I’m a brainless rioter who wants to loot and steal and I don’t care if any lives are lost”.

    End the attempt at newspeak now. All lives matter. Black lives matter. White lives matter. Asian lives matter.

  153. @American Citizen 2.0

    Sure, it could work. The primary ‘war’ festering in America is political, not racial. It is the Marxists on the Left who are presenting the real problems….hands down. They are who needs to go live their lofty ideals and suffer the results — like Calif, like NYC, Illinois, the Chop/Chaz Zone, etc.

    Look at the long history of Europe. Borders and countries have changed quite a bit on that continent…..even as recently as middle of the last century.

    There is no nirvana, no Shangri-La…so I have no expectation of that. But, plenty of us would like to live in peace and work out issues with people of somewhat similar values and work ethic.

    I would remain in the Heartland and since we’d be the biggest land mass, we get to keep the name America. See, it’s all settled….. ;o)

  154. Katrinka says:

    Excellent article. I think that whites have a lot of work cut out for them.

  155. Al Liguori says: • Website

    • Agree: bruce county
    • Thanks: geokat62, Robjil
    • LOL: Whitewolf
    • Replies: @Whitewolf
  156. Art says:

    It is amazing how many commenters defend their skin – but refuse to defend their superior Western Christian culture.

    It is Christian Western culture that is superior – not European brains – NE Asians and elements of India have superior intellectual abilities over whites – but it is whites who have the superior idealistic creative desires and abilities to cooperate with each other.

    We have allowed the Jews to twist our thinking, to favor skin and tribe over idealist culture.

    Shame!

  157. Thim says:

    It’s damn good to be blond.

  158. Ordinary black and white folk should probably realize after so many decades of blaming one another for their problems that neither are actually responsible for the others problems.

    Same way both should realize that voting for the red team or blue team of the uniparty every couple of years is doing nothing to address their problems.

    They should also realize by now that their situation continues to get worse, no matter how much each blames the other, or how many different flavors of red and blue team they vote for. The same ol bullshit continues, almost like your vote for your favorite team doesn’t actually mean anything, nor does blaming the other slaves for how shitty the plantation is becoming.

    Maybe both should start looking somewheres else to blame? Perhaps at the “economic system” itself? The system that was designed in an era of widespread slavery, and exploitation of both poor white and black folk, and attempted extermination of a continent’s worth of indigenous people. The same system that just funneled 5 trillion+ to the richest mfers on the planet while telling both the white and black slaves to eat shit and die. Maybe that be your problem?

    Anyone else think that the system may be what is responsible for all the race baiting and identity politics? That maybe it is reaching a dead end, like some Marxist guy warned us it would? The only solution it has out of the situation its in is war and theft. So who will benefit from the next American “Civil War” the first one certainly didn’t work out so well for either of the slaves did it?

    Capitalism is the ideology of slavery theft and murder.

    https://medium.com/@rainershea612/neoliberalism-survives-by-destroying-social-cohesion-738a3a8553df

    • Agree: FB
  159. geokat62 says:
    @Art

    …but it is whites who have the superior idealistic creative desires and abilities to cooperate with each other.

    As your perceptive statement implies, Art, culture is downstream from biology.

    • Replies: @Art
  160. @Art

    Nah….a segment of Asians score a few points higher on IQ tests….but the European mind is more powerful intellectually.

    The European has a higher level of invention, creativity, ingenuity, and imagination.

    In terms of civilization, I will give Korea and Japan some credit. Hong Kong. The rest of Asia and India are squalor for the most part.

    I’d agree that Christianity was a huge influence on our success in terms of building high trust societies. In fact, KMAC says that Christianity was our ONLY cohesive group strategy, and this is certainly obvious to the nation wrecking small hat crew.

  161. American Citizen 2.0 [AKA "American Citizen 3.0"] says:
    @The Real World

    The racial issue is the political issue.

    • Replies: @The Real World
  162. American Citizen 2.0 [AKA "American Citizen 3.0"] says:
    @USA1943

    White people have been hating on other white people since time immemorial. If you are not familiar with the abdication of Charles V, Holy Roman Emperor, around 1555 after vicious religious wars between Catholics and Protestants, which incidentally is one of the main reasons Europeans started buying Landscape paintings instead of religious paintings (nobody wanted art that flagrantly advertised which side of the war they were on), then that’s a fun topic to learn about.

    Can’t stop the hustle. White people have strong beliefs and will fight over them with other white people who also have strong beliefs.

  163. Art says:
    @geokat62

    As your perceptive statement implies, Art, culture is downstream from biology.

    geokat62,

    Absolutely – every atom and molecule on the face of the planet has been affected, touched, and moved by cultural knowledge. Knowledge is directing change. If we stay within the rules of physics and biology we can and are, by intellectual and cultural means, affecting our existence. That is an absolute truth.

    Idealistic Christian philosophy is a major part of the success of Western culture. Without question our Western freedom is a derivative of Christianity. Its hope, respect for life, love of neighbor, truth seeking, forgiveness, and grace are the engine of human progress.

    Christianity promotes our better angels – the Jews our darkness.

    Art

  164. Whitewolf says:
    @sonofman

    “White,” is also not a race or ideology or even a culture. It is only a term used to throw all of the different Europeans into one boat (similar to the “European Union”, and similarly delusive

    We are on one boat as far as race goes and politically as well.

  165. DrWatson says:
    @cassandra

    Yes! The Covington kid successfully sued. CNN and WaPo settled already but he is not done. https://www.foxnews.com/media/washington-post-settles-nicholas-sandmann-defamation-lawsuit-in-covington-catholic-high-school-controversy

  166. DrWatson says:

    Even more encouraging this pic on twitter, showing 3 Black and 3 White kids with saying “Defund the MSM” on their T-shirts

    • Agree: Robjil
    • Replies: @DrWatson
  167. @redmudhooch

    What economic system are you recommending as a superior alternative?

    And, have you ever lived in a country where that economic system exists?

  168. DrWatson says:
    @DrWatson

    Oops. It was my wishful thinking. Their T-shirt says “Defund the Media”. But you get the point.

  169. @VinnyVette

    There is no race war. What is happening currently is entirely manufactured — more Leftist kabuki theater to freak the country out prior to the election.

    Do people realize that there is NO EVIDENCE that race played any part in the George Floyd incident? I’ve mentioned that to a couple of people in person and they each got a deer-in-the-headlights look as they comprehended that a national meltdown occurred based merely on an allegation of racism!

    Yeah, that’s how nuts and dumb America is in 2020. If TV is yapping and exaggerating about whatever fool “issue”, far too many believe it just because it’s emitting from the electronic box.

    • Agree: Sya Beerens
  170. Whitewolf says:
    @Art

    It is Christian Western culture that is superior – not European brains

    Christianity wasn’t needed in ancient Greek or Roman cultures. European brains sufficed.

    Christianity isn’t some magical ideology that increases IQ by 30 points. Especially when for centuries the church burned people at the stake for suggesting things like the earth orbiting the sun. I find it hard to imagine the benefits to European culture of arguing over how many angels can dance on the head of a pin.

    • Replies: @Art
  171. Whitewolf says:
    @Al Liguori

    We must fight “Gentile Supremacy”.

  172. Miro23 says:
    @Bogus Pogus

    Meanwhile, both the UK and Australia strictly follow anti-Chinese US neo-con talking points and MSM spin.

    If the Australians did some independent analysis, they would realized that their best policy would be neutrality (or support China on the virus accusations??) rather than ridiculously trying to threaten China militarily.

    But that’s what they’re doing;

    Australia’s defense policy is being adjusted to concentrate on our immediate region, and to equip the Australian Defence Force (ADF) with greater capability for deterring threats, including by significant new investment in longer-range strike capabilities across air, sea and land.

    Morrison will announce the government will buy the AGM-158C Long Range Anti-Ship Missile from the US Navy, costing about $800 million. This missile has a range of more than 370 kilometres and is a significant upgrade from the current Harpoon anti-ship missile.

    https://theconversation.com/scott-morrison-pivots-australian-defence-force-to-meet-more-threatening-regional-outlook-141727

    • Replies: @The Wild Geese Howard
  173. @Winnetou1889

    Methinks you would enjoy my little joke on the subject, then. Follow the link…
    https://greenpets.co.za/index.php/en/truthers/12-paranoid-goy/257-heilhitler

    • Replies: @Winnetou1889
  174. @3g4me

    The problem with principles, though, is that they are powerful filters through which you observe your reality, and thus create your own reality. By talking like a besieged minority you cannot hear when others are complaining about your perceived enemy, and you may miss a chance to form useful coalitions. As a member of “the most endangered culture” I have long decided not to live in fear, and when I hear an asshole stoking fires, I feel obliged to call him out. And sometimes, I get proven wrong. So I learn.
    That is why, upstanding honest brave citizen 3g4me, I shall disregard your ad hominems, you know so much, you think fighting against 5g is a moral imperative? Maybe you should stick to WiFi, then you can follow my link at the top, and see where I think our real battle should be, instead of the rampant racism stoked by the Bolsheviks you call The Elite, or even just ‘Them’.
    Trying to talk sense into warring factions is always seen as pusillanimy by the ones whith blunt blades and shares in the undertakers.

    • Replies: @3g4me
  175. @redmudhooch

    Right on, brother! Now add that capitalism is communism is globalism is the ultimate concentration of all property on earth into One Account, and your treatment of the subject is complete.
    …and the only reason we have let it progress to this dire state of affairs, is because of “christian duty”. Communism is the strictest religion ever, and their crusade is almost complete, and soon Zion will unveil our True One God. …and He hates us.

  176. DrWatson says:
    @Bogus Pogus

    If someone, being White, condemns “It is OK to be White’, they should be demanded to commit suicide ASAP. What else could be a logical conclusion to such sentiment?

    • Replies: @Robjil
  177. throtler says:
    @American Citizen 2.0

    I don’t agree that for humanitarian reasons, everyone should not be told that Africans are the most stupid and violent race on the planet. The truth should be known by all.

  178. Biff says:
    @redmudhooch

    That maybe it is reaching a dead end, like some Marxist guy warned us it would?

    I wonder what his name is?

  179. anon[310] • Disclaimer says:
    @redmudhooch

    You’ve pretty much said what I’ve been wanting to say for a few days now and just haven’t been able to.

    I just don’t get it.

    I read Greg Hood’s “Nick Cannon Shows Us Who Is Really Privileged” article yesterday.

    This is a summary of Greg Hood’s article:

    Nick Cannon talked about colonialism and slavery during an interview and didn’t use the word “white” even once. Greg Hood then proceeds to bitch and moan like a stupid fucking jew for a few hundred words about stupid uppity black criminals, who use their racially inferior black privilege to violently lord it over whites who’ve no white privilege. Greg Hood then bitches and moans like a stupid fucking jew for a few more hundred words about the stupid fucking jews and all their stupid fucking jew privilege. Greg Hood then proceeds to bitch and moan like a stupid fucking jew for a few more hundred words about poor persecuted whites and their white victimhood, white truth, and fighting white genocide to become whiter than those stupid fucking jews. The End.

    I read Greg Johnson’s “It’s Okay to be White” article earlier today, and I couldn’t work out if it was supposed to be satire at first, and then I clicked on the first hyperlink to the author’s own article about “white privilege”. After that, I wanted to stick needles in my eyes.

    Do Greg Hood and Greg Johnson never listen to themselves speak? Have they not read any of the obscene shit that white people write about blacks here all the time?

    Is there a cure for white nationalism that doesn’t involve “white genocide”? Because I know which one I’d prefer if I was forced to choose.

    • Replies: @Usura
  180. denk says:
    @Truth3

    Blacks, Asians, Hispanics, are used by the Jews to destroy the White Euro populations.

    Mohamad Ali,

    iN Nam,
    “white people sending black people to kill yellow people ‘

    Three millions VN wiped out.

    In Indon,
    Whites sent brown men to genocide yellow people.
    https://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-07-21/1965-indonesian-mass-killings-were-crimes-against-humanity/7647274

    Three millions Chinese peasants massacred.

    In South Asia,

    Whites sent blacks [their Indian cousins] to kill yellow ….

    1962
    JFK sent Nehru to attack China
    2020
    Trump sent Modi to attack China,
    https://www.veteranstoday.com/2020/05/28/after-failure-of-covid-19-bioweapon-trumps-turns-to-india-as-weapon-against-china/

  181. Robjil says:
    @DrWatson

    It is OK to be Yellow

    It is OK to be Red

    It is OK to be Brown

    It is OK to be Palestinian

    It is OK to be Gentile, as noted by Al Liquori in post 160

    It is OK to be White

    If the last one is “racist”. Why is the white color so popular for painting walls, paper, and clothing?

    All uses of the “white” color should then be “racist”.

    People used to say that the word “colored” was racist. Yet, now POC is promoted.

    People should not be labeled by colors. No one on earth has a “white” skin. Caucasians come in many light to dark skin tones.

    The same thing applies to the color black. No one on earth has “black” skin. African, South East Indians, and some South Pacific/Australian peoples have very dark skin but not “black” skin.

    Yet, black and white is the most promoted “colors” for people in our faux free Zion MSM.

    • Agree: denk
    • LOL: 3g4me
  182. American Citizen 2.0 [AKA "American Citizen 3.0"] says:
    @throtler

    That is the conundrum. People have a lot of reasons to not want to talk about the truth of human biodiversity, i.e. the reasons why we are not all the same. I have sympathy for that point of view but then it shouldn’t have to be us exclusively that bears the burden of trying to integrate them. Let India or China or some other racially enlightened people solve the problem of what to do about Africans in the modern world. But simply calling us racists and denying that our experience of having lived around people of African decent longer than anyone else has any validity is wrong too. Americans have spent trillions and trillions of dollars trying to educate, feed, house, and otherwise take care of people of African descent and the end result has been that they live in slums, shoot each for almost no reason at all, can’t read or write, and in the end out of a population of 40 million of them here you get maybe 10 PhD level math and science graduates a year (and that is with affirmative action lowering the bar so that they can qualify in many cases). We should not be forced to bear the brunt of thousands and thousands of murders, rapes, robberies, etc endlessly just because people refuse to see the truth about this stone age population that introgressed with another species entirely living among us. I don’t think anyone knows how to get past this political problem but simply acting like they would be “like us” in some sense if we just gave them a chance has been proven to be false over and over.

  183. starthorn says:
    @Franz

    Even the Black History Museum said reason and sanity were, like work ethic and saving for the future, part of white culture.

    • Agree: American Citizen 2.0
  184. sonofman says:
    @Usura

    Rebuttal.
    Everyone is born with three influence groups: gender, family, and nationality. Gender decides physical capabilities and is still a determining power factor in the hierarchies of families, organizations, societies and even religions. Family is inherited gratitude and an almost inseparable union of love, respect and conflict. Nationality is the program that defines values, traditions and progression. But even these influences are open to subjective changes. You may be inclined to consider the opinions of friends, colleagues and acquaintances, but how can you acknowledge the judgments of anyone who does not know you personally? Or how can you accurately judge an individual just based upon an affiliation to a group that is defined by someone not in that group?

    How does the term “white” convey a shared ancestry? Europe also has a long history of tribal conflict. The European Union now has 27 States, 24 official languages, and only God knows how many different dialects. Africa now has 55 States and almost two thousand languages. It is certain that each group with their own language has their own history. So which tribe or country in Europe does “white” refer to? And if “white” just refers to people whose ancestors were born on the European continent, how can they be given a generalized behavioral characterization when the history and actuality shows the exact opposite?

    Is a “white” nationalist an American patriot descendant from the European continent, or does “white” nationalist suggest a different patriotic discipline?

    Monoamine oxidase is relevant in conjunction with socially provocative situations that cause anger, fear and frustration (hunger, poverty and lack of education or prospects).

    “Black” is the subculture of ex-slaves who were denied almost every connection to their African languages, customs and traditions. There are African- Americans (who know their ancestry) who do not consider themselves as “Black”. If President Obama were also Black and not just African-American, he would have been a lot more uppity. There are also people with less than 50% who are considered African-American.

    Genetic ancestry concerns physical, biological and chemical aspects of heredity. But it cannot predict human potential or forensically verify the emotions involved in decision making.

    The World has always been multicultural, nothing mythical about that. And now, thanks to the Internet, we are all connected. Europe is now celebrating 75 years of tolerance and mutual respect, an example showing that, with effort, different people can live together peacefully. Even the multiculturalism within country boundaries can succeed if everyone involved is receptive of each other’s perspectives.

    It’s okay to be a human being, no matter what skin color or continent of origin.

  185. 3g4me says:
    @Art

    @161 Art: Culture is downstream from biology. Christian Western culture is the product of White European men building on the foundations of Roman and Greek thought and tempered by Christianity. Skin color is merely a proxy for genetics. Race is a family writ large.

    We have allowed wormtongues like Art to continually claim that merely culture matters, not race. That only principles matter, not skin color. The result is a demonic clownworld.

    SHAME! (Or would that be ‘a shanda for the goyim?)

    • Replies: @Art
  186. I don’t know about the actual situation in America but in India I can say that many people think it is desirable to be white! For marriage matches etc. one always prefers white and looks down on black or brown, though most people in India are not white but come under the Brown race. This sentiment or mindset is widespread in all castes – high or low.

  187. 3g4me says:
    @paranoid goy

    @179 Paranoid Goy: A coalition where one partner will reliably stab the other in the back because of its nature is not a coalition I choose to be part of. That innately poor race relations are stoked by the money men because it’s useful to them in no way negates the fact that race relations are innately poor. I despise your use of the anti-White terms ‘racist’ and ‘racism.’ Diversity +proximity = war is a fundamental and historical truth.

    Go peddle your ‘trying to talk sense into warring factions’ to your fellow tribe members or the noggers; I’m not buying whatever you’re peddling.

    • Agree: Pheasant
    • Replies: @paranoid goy
  188. Usura says:
    @anon

    Anyone can read that article and see that you’ve misrepresented it:
    https://www.unz.com/ghood/nick-cannon-shows-us-who-is-really-privileged/

    Do Greg Hood and Greg Johnson never listen to themselves speak? Have they not read any of the obscene shit that white people write about blacks here all the time?

    As contrasted with your thrice intoned incantation about “stupid fucking jew[s]”? Don’t make me laugh. Johnson’s article on white privilege is well written and factual. Again, people can read it and decide for themselves:
    https://www.counter-currents.com/2019/11/the-very-idea-of-white-privilege/

    Is there a cure for white nationalism that doesn’t involve “white genocide”? Because I know which one I’d prefer if I was forced to choose.

    Spoken like a true non-white; you would rather have all whites killed than permit even one all-white nation. Does this also meet your standard of ‘obscene’ commentary? Or are you as un-self-aware as the anti-black commenters you disparage?

  189. @sonofman

    Europe is now celebrating 75 years of tolerance and mutual respect, an example showing that, with effort, different people can live together peacefully. Even the multiculturalism within country boundaries can succeed if everyone involved is receptive of each other’s perspectives.

    In other news, the guy who jumped off the skyscraper explained that everything was fine as he passed the twentieth floor!

  190. jfred says:
    @sonofman

    Your mind has been rotted by bad education. The great causality chain is:
    Biology>Culture>Institutions>Politics>Economics

  191. American Citizen 2.0 [AKA "American Citizen 3.0"] says:
    @denk

    It’s not true that America sent large numbers of Black people to Vietnam. This is mainly because most black people cannot qualify to serve in combat because they lack the intellectual ability, which is why they usually take supporting roles like being cooks or driving trucks. The single biggest source of information over time about IQ and race comes from the US military which was legally obliged to integrate very early on. To get into various roles in the Military you have to take specific exams. Black people fail almost all of them in exactly the same way as you see in Police, Firemen, and every other job that requires a minimum level of intellectual ability as assessed by a written test. The trend has been to lower the bar for Blacks so that they can at least be represented in various careers but in the case of the Military that did not work because lowering the intellectual bar and putting morons in combat just leads to the morons dying at a much higher rate than normal. This was in fact tried with the group of recruits called “McNamara’s Morons” and they did in fact die at a higher rate than normal.

    In the end the fantasy that Black people would end up being useful in the military was abandoned and we switched to a recruitment only all volunteer army where almost every combat role is filled by White people and Hispanics.

    The percentage of Black combat troops in Vietnam was at most 10% of the total. So White people were close to 90% of the total.

    The mere fact that only a few thousand Europeans were able to enslave hundreds of millions of Africans at will in the olden days should suffice to show you that Africans are basically useless in warfare. They have a lot of strengths, but organized combat isn’t one of them.

    • Agree: Pheasant
    • Replies: @denk
    , @Malla
  192. geokat62 says:
    @sonofman

    It’s okay to be a human being, no matter what skin color or continent of origin.

    Jonathan Greenblatt, is that you?

    • Replies: @anon
  193. Goddard says:
    @Realist

    Yes. Proximity.

    • Agree: Realist
  194. Usura says:
    @sonofman

    So which tribe or country in Europe does “white” refer to? And if “white” just refers to people whose ancestors were born on the European continent, how can they be given a generalized behavioral characterization when the history and actuality shows the exact opposite?

    It doesn’t refer to one tribe or country, it refers to the cluster of haplogroups I mentioned. This doesn’t mean “anyone born on the European continent”, it means “anyone with the majority of their DNA from the set of haplogroups E1b1b, , I, J, R1a, and R1b”, some of which originated east of Europe, and then whose bearers migrated.

    Genetic ancestry concerns physical, biological and chemical aspects of heredity. But it cannot predict human potential or forensically verify the emotions involved in decision making.

    It can predict human potential for violence, intelligence, smoking addiction, schizophrenia, as well as many other behaviors and psychological disorders and/or forms of ideation. Are these factors in “decision making”? Is intelligence, which is moderately heritable, a factor in decision making?

    • Agree: American Citizen 2.0
    • Replies: @Corvinus
  195. anon[243] • Disclaimer says:
    @throtler

    I don’t agree that for humanitarian reasons, everyone should not be told that Africans are the most stupid and violent race on the planet. The truth should be known by all.

    And I agree that for humanitarian reasons, brain damaged and race-obsessed white window lickers like you and your interlocutor, should be told over and over and over again that White Europeans are the most stupid, violent and cruel “race on the planet” AND that you gave the world “scientific racism”, the stick that is now being used to beat you and control you, along with everyone else. Your brainwashed white stupidity isn’t “The truth”.

    • Replies: @American Citizen 2.0
  196. anon[264] • Disclaimer says:
    @geokat62

    Jonathan Greenblatt, is that you?

    Fran Taubman, is that you?

  197. @3g4me

    Sorry, next time I’ll try use words you can read…. u not c 2 good?

  198. Pheasant says:
    @American Citizen 2.0

    ‘White Privilege” really comes from old French and Spanish Revolutionary writings pertaining to Aristocratic Privilege and Clerical Privilege’

    It comes from Jews.

    Now shut the fuck up.

    • Troll: Corvinus
    • Replies: @American Citizen 2.0
  199. J Faggotman epitomizes the disgusting far-left, marxist views of the left. The same people who brought you feminism, Holocaustianity, destructive abortion ‘rights’, and other Judaic-satanic creations.

    He and his ilk will be burned in a purifying outpouring and disgust that will soon sweep across the West. The Silent Majority is tired of their disgusting anti-life views and their , homosexual and pedophilia agenda. Their destructive degeneracy will be ended.. These are the people who want to have sex with animals and rape our children. They are criminal degenerates and will be treated accordingly in future.
    Our patience is running out.

    • Agree: bruce county
  200. @malliksharma

    Beautiful women come in all colors, but there’s something singularly beautiful, ceteris paribus, about beautiful women who are white. “White” women come in *a greater variety of colors* than do women of color! Ravishing redheads, sultry blondes, winsome brunettes! Dark- and medium- and fair-complected! Freckly skin, alabaster skin, olive skin! Blue eyes, green eyes, gray eyes, brown eyes, amber eyes, hazel eyes!

    They come tall and short, buxom and petite, willowy and leggy and callipygian! We’re talking a veritable potpourri of pulchritude!

    Black is beautiful? That may well be, but black men seem to have a penchant for white women. As do Asian men and Mideastern men. As do white men. So what happens to the supply of white women when miscegenation kicks into high gear? Or if white women and men otherwise meet their demise? Some things seem more worth preserving than that cockamamie snail darter, don’t they?

  201. @Tono Bungay

    You are correct, sir!

    Whites are also tired of Israel welfare, Jew media lies, Jew economic and legal corruption and the discriminatory hiring practices.aka black welfare, actual black welfare, the hispanic onslaught and visa workers. We want our country back. It is ours. We founded it. We built it and we’ve died for it.

    Jews, blacks and browns cannot say the same. They need to stfu, sit the [email protected] down or, better yet, just [email protected] leave. I look forward to expelling all of the above to be truthful. The day that the West is purged of invaders, parasites and freeloaders would be the best day in the last 300 years of The West. It would see a renaissance of creativity and growth that would vindicate the purification process.

  202. Corvinus says:

    It’s more than OK to be white, black, Hispanic, and indigenous, since we are all human.

    Hate facts…

    Source –> https://www.dartmouth.edu/~hist32/History/White.htm

    Between 1880 and WWI, the United States experienced large waves of European immigration. These “new immigrants” however did not come from northern Europe and represented a frightening diversity to many. The difference perceived in these immigrants was frequently described as a racial difference in which Europeans were represented as, not one, but many races identified by region (Alpine, Mediterranean, Slavic and Nordic) or by alleged headshape (roundheads, slopeheads).

    Madison Grant, a biologist and curator for the American Museum of Natural History in New York explained in his book The Passing of the Great Race that White Americans, the great race, were losing out to hordes of inferior European immigrants. Grant’s book was so popular it experienced 7 reprints before WWII.

    According to Grant, “These new immigrants were no longer exclusively members of the Nordic race as were the earlier ones…The transportation lines advertised America as a land flowing with milk and honey and the European governments took the opportunity to unload upon careless, wealthy and hospitable America the sweepings of their jails and asylums…Our jails, insane asylums and almshouses are filled with this human flotsam and the whole tone of american life, social, moral and political has been lowered and vulgarized by them.”

    So much for white unity!

    Consider in the late 1800’s/early 1900’s, Senator Henry Cabot Lodge articulated the necessity for literacy tests and other measures to weed out, at worst, or outright deny, at best, the inclusion of “new” immigrants into American society –>

    “It is found, in the first place, that the illiteracy test will bear most heavily upon the Italians, Russians, Poles, Hungarians, Greeks, and Asiatics, and lightly, or not at all, upon English-speaking emigrants, or Germans, Scandinavians, and French. In other words, the races most affected by the illiteracy test are those whose emigration to this country has begun within the last twenty years and swelled rapidly to enormous proportions, races with which the English speaking people have never hitherto assimilated, and who are most alien to the great body of the people of the United States.”

    A damning indictment on white Europeans who opened up the floodgates to other “alien”, but white, Europeans to invade our shores, nuzzle with our nubile women, and run roughshod over our liberties. Indeed, nativists from the mid and late 1800’s were not too keen, to put it mildly, on several European ethnic groups, chiefly the Irish and the Italians, arriving here because of their genetically inferiority and social incompetence. Recall it did not matter that these newcomers were white, it mattered to nativists that these two groups were utterly incapable of fitting in. Nativists were convinced the Irish and Italians possessed in-born tendencies that would perversely transform the American landscape as created by Anglo-Saxons.

    So much for white unity!

    Finally, a quote from Mr. Johnson’s nemesis, the Alt Right leader Vox Day.

    ”The Italians and the Irish were the original problem. They could have, and should have, been handled like the Chinese were. But they laid the groundwork for the Jews, the Germans, and the Scandinavians, who made things even worse. And they paved the way for the Mexicans, the Africans, and the Muslims. At this point, the USA probably can’t get back to 1986, let alone 1965.”

    Interesting. Basically, a specific group of whites, in this case European, who were deemed undesirable, which then opened up the floodgates to other “alien” Europeans to invade our shores.

    So much for white unity!

    As an aside, I would like Mr. Johnson to address how his ideology falls into line with Christian values. Perhaps he would indulge, or maybe his acolytes would like to take a crack at it…

  203. anon[242] • Disclaimer says:

    There’s only one problem with ending White Privilege and bringing about White Genocide.

    Who are the Jews going to leech off then?

    • Replies: @Sya Beerens
  204. Corvinus says:
    @Afterthought

    “The answer is split up the United States.”

    You mean a Second Civil War in the United States and no partitioning or breakup, whether it be peaceful dissolution or a violent overthrow of the entire system? No. Besides, I highly doubt any of the posters here are ready to don jackboots and scalp their enemies should it come to a full-fledged war. More likely that people will carve out their small redoubts.

    The question is, will YOU be there with you rifle ready to aim and fire on those deemed “the enemy”? That requires the killing of young people—teenagers, toddlers, and infants—to prevent them from bearing future leftists and cucks. Besides, the Jews and banksters and elites have a “in case of emergency, break glass” contingency plan already in place. Do you think they will give up their stranglehold on power without a fight?

    Moreover, what is the course of action? Who will make this decision? How will this plan be developed and implemented? What happens to our Constitution? Our past court decisions–are they honored? Would people have to move? Where? By force, if needed? What happens if they resist? How will international treaties be dealt with? How will property be protected?

    Come back to us with specific responses to these questions. Then we will take you seriously.

    • Replies: @Justvisiting
  205. @Corvinus

    Notice that the CWII folks never want to talk about nuclear weapons.

    Mutual assured destruction is a real thing–and a real deterrence.

    That will highly motivate the parties to lock themselves in a room and cut a deal…..

  206. @American Citizen 2.0

    No, the political agenda is much, much bigger. Racial strife is simply ginned-up when the Marxists want to drive a deep wedge in an election year.

    Otherwise, they don’t give a damn about blacks or any other racial group. They only care about garnering minority money, support and VOTES..

    Leftist dogma, agenda and **control** are all that matter. Race-baiting is a lever to ensure those.

  207. American Citizen 2.0 [AKA "American Citizen 3.0"] says:
    @Pheasant

    I am guessing you were a solid C- minus student in the 8th grade, which seems to be when you stopped learning things. “White Privilege” might have been written about by Jews lately but you clearly have absolutely no idea that there have been NUMEROUS revolutionary movements in Europe wherein the same general idea was deployed in various ways, most of which had nothing to do with “Jews”.

    Rock solid brainpower in this here thread. Wow.

  208. Art says:
    @3g4me

    @161 Art: Culture is downstream from biology. Christian Western culture is the product of White European men building on the foundations of Roman and Greek thought and tempered by Christianity. Skin color is merely a proxy for genetics. Race is a family writ large.

    We have allowed wormtongues like Art to continually claim that merely culture matters, not race. That only principles matter, not skin color.

    Genetics follows environment. The fittest survive. Christianity is a cooperative philosophy – where hope abounds – life is sacred – love your neighbor – the truth will set you free – all promote an environment where cooperative people survive and thrive.

    p.s. Rome and Greece where preceded by Egypt – the longest lasting great culture in human history. Egyptians are not Euro white.

    • Replies: @3g4me
  209. anon[363] • Disclaimer says:
    @sonofman

    And now, thanks to the Internet, we are all connected. Europe is now celebrating 75 years of tolerance and mutual respect, an example showing that, with effort, different people can live together peacefully.

    The above doesn’t hold water.

    It’s okay to be a human being, no matter what skin color or continent of origin.

    Because of things like ethnic-victimhood nationalism, American imperialism (or any other kind of imperialism), Neo-colonialism, Neo-liberalism, parasitic-Judaism/Zionism etc., it really isn’t.

    But you’ve triggered the ethnic-victimhood nationalists, so good job!

  210. jb says:

    I don’t think the “white genocide” meme is particularly useful. If your child marries a black person and your grandchildren are half black, well, they are still your biological grandchildren. Genetically they are still one quarter you. How is that “genocide”? This is not a meme that will convince anyone who does not already care about preserving whiteness. It’s preaching to the choir.

    However the “It’s okay to be white” meme is powerful, for all the reasons you list in your article. I think the response you’d get from the Left is “well of course in an abstract sense it’s OK to be white, but society in general — and People of Color in particular! — are under severe threat from racist white supremacists, so for the safety of everyone any slogan associated with such people, however anodyne, must be treated as willful dissent (um, I mean as a willful call to violence) and ruthlessly suppressed.”

    Of course there will be people who believe this so deeply that they will never be convinced otherwise. But I think there is a much larger group of people, including many old school liberals, who are not on board with preserving whiteness, but who are not on board with active hostility to whiteness either, and who already know, or can be persuaded, that white supremacy does not pose any such existential threat. For such people a clear demonstration that “white supremacy” is a lie can serve as a “pink pill.” It doesn’t take them all the way, but it’s still a significant win. (In fact for such people a clear demonstration that anti-white hostility exists on the Left is probably the best we can hope for).

  211. Art says:
    @Whitewolf

    Christianity wasn’t needed in ancient Greek or Roman cultures. European brains sufficed.

    Christianity isn’t some magical ideology that increases IQ by 30 points. Especially when for centuries the church burned people at the stake for suggesting things like the earth orbiting the sun.

    Hmm — obviously with the same genetics, Christianity surpassed both Greece and Rome.

    The people who were burned at the stake where Christian clergy trained in Christian schools. History shows that their ideas prevailed over their killers. The Church no longer disputes science findings. The Catholic Church does not dispute Darwin.

    • Replies: @NobodyKnowsImADog
  212. 3g4me says:
    @Art

    @216 Art: You are not merely a sophist, but a certified moron. Ancient Egyptians (the peasants) were about 10% sub-Saharan genetically, versus 20% on average today. But the upper class and ruling Egyptians were classic Levantines and had genetics much closer to the Greeks than anyone else. So no, not sorry, noggers weren’t kangz.

    To claim genetics follow environment is not merely wishful thinking but overt idiocy. Adoption study after twin study has conclusively demonstrated that one’s genetic heritage determines one’s general intelligence, achievement and/or success in life far more than any environment. You are a civic nationalist lite, and you are a fool. Your neighbor (per the bible) is not someone of an alien race from thousands of miles away, and you do not bring him into your home nor give him your children’s patrimony. You are a typical virtue signaling churchian. Get thee gone, anti-White satan. Go live amongst the ‘christians’ in Africa and you’ll come to your well deserved end.

    • Agree: NobodyKnowsImADog
    • Troll: Corvinus
    • Replies: @Art
  213. American Citizen 2.0 [AKA "American Citizen 3.0"] says:
    @anon

    Hard to see how you are going to make this Black Supremacy thing work on a global scale if you lose it like that over some comments on the Internet. Wake me up when Africa finally produces it’s Isaac Newton after something like 5 billion babies. Hint: the fruit falls from the tree because of gravity, which is a fundamental force. That’s more of a hint than Newton got and he figured it out by candle light with a quill pen.

    Wakanda Forever.

    • Replies: @Justvisiting
    , @anon
  214. Franz says:
    @Franz

    No prob.

    I post stuff after my shift quite often and in the fog of morning I might feel lucid but it’s just that rush you get from being overtired. Easy to screw up.

  215. @American Citizen 2.0

    If whites pay for the education of another 5 billion blacks around the world in a few decades or centuries we _might_ get another Isaac Newton.

    I guess we will have to try though….we are in all this together…..

    Or not……

    • Replies: @anon
  216. dfordoom says: • Website

    The trouble with white nationalists is that they tend to discredit themselves by overstating their case. They start out sounding sane and reasonable, and obviously they’re correct that there is hostility towards whites. Then they start with the hysterical white genocide nonsense and normal people stop listening to them.

    Or they start whining about sub-replacement white fertility as if it’s a conspiracy against whites, when in fact all races in the US are now at sub-replacement fertility. In fact the entire developed world is at sub-replacement fertility. Clearly whatever has caused the collapse in fertility rates has nothing to do with race, but white nationalists insist on making it an anti-white conspiracy.

  217. dfordoom says: • Website
    @Observator

    And it is infinitely troubling that the Ford Foundation, J P Morgan Chase, and other gatekeepers of the status quo pour tens of millions into BLM’s coffers. Capitalism requires a permanent underclass to prosper; it will never fund its own extinction. Its minions are generous to controlled opposition movements which serve them by distracting us from the fundamental problem of our culture, the unequal distribution of wealth.

    I certainly agree with that.

  218. @anon

    Recourse rich nations…

  219. dfordoom says: • Website
    @Reg Cæsar

    For awhile wags were posting signs saying “Islam is right about women.” The other side was frozen. We could do the same with “Whites are wrong about gays.”

    Actually you could say “Whites are wrong about pretty much everything.”

    Whites are wrong about gays, they’re wrong about trannies, they’re wrong about climate change (are there any non-whites dumb enough to actually believe in climate change?), they’re wrong in their delusions about democracy, they’re wrong in their fetishisation of college educations. They’re also wrong about veganism (apart from a few religious groups are there any non-white vegans?). They’re wrong about bicycles (grown-ups have no business riding bicycles). They’re wrong to be terrified of nuclear power. They’re wrong about renewable energy. They’re wrong about recycling.

    Almost everything that whites believe in is absolute nonsense.

    It might be OK to be white but it sure is embarrassing.

    • LOL: bruce county
    • Replies: @Art
  220. American Citizen 2.0 [AKA "American Citizen 3.0"] says:
    @jb

    I see where you are coming from JB but there are several points to keep in mind.

    1. We are not generally asking for anything from Leftists in the way that black people are. So the whole idea that we are somehow going to appeal to them to be nice to us and let us exist or whatever isn’t really on the table. Black people do that because otherwise they wouldn’t get affirmative action.

    2. Only white women can have white babies. Pink nipples matter.

    3. Racism is just another taboo. Right now the Left is all upset about it but in the end they accept every taboo. I remember when everyone in America thought gay marriage was awful. Now, it’s pretty well universally accepted. Even Barack Obama was opposed to gay marriage. Eventually, being a racist will be like being a furry. You might not like it and you might think that people who like it are really weird but in the end there is something intriguing about it and you just end up accepting that some people have this odd proclivity. Why is every other taboo accepted but not this particular one? Morality? Leftists are people who have absolutely no morality when it comes to anything else. So what is propelling this one forward except for globalist political brainwashing? Nothing.

  221. 3g4me says:
    @jb

    @218 jb: “If your child marries a black person and your grandchildren are half black, well, they are still your biological grandchildren. Genetically they are still one quarter you.”

    Not true. White people with miscegenated grandchildren are more closely genetically related to any random White on the street than they are with their own purported grandchildren. The genetic difference between Whites and blacks is that great. You don’t welcome the cuckoo bird’s egg into the nest; you push it out.

  222. Art says:
    @3g4me

    The Egyptian Cops are the descendants of the BC Egyptians. They do not look like Europeans – they look Middle Eastern.

    You: (Or would that be ‘a shanda for the goyim?)

    Your know-it-all antagonism marks you as a Jew. Loving a neighbor is something foreign to the mind of a Jew.

    p.s. All of Israel’s geographic neighbors justly hate it.

  223. Art says:
    @dfordoom

    Almost everything that whites believe in is absolute nonsense.

    Correction:

    Almost everything that the 20% upper whites believe in is absolute nonsense.

    • Replies: @dfordoom
  224. dfordoom says: • Website
    @Anonymous

    I suggest that White people do not like the industrialized society that (a) their ancestors built, (b) they live in, and (c) is killing them and their children.

    The problem is that white people like this society very much. For all its faults (and they are many) industrialised society has given us living standards that no previous society could have dreamt of, vastly longer life expectancies and lives of luxury and ease compared to non-industrialised societies.

    And even though our freedoms are being progressively eroded we still have much greater freedom than people living in traditional societies.

    The reason fertility rates have collapsed (for all races) in the industrialised world is, paradoxically, because life is so good. It is no longer necessary to have children to avoid starving to death when we get old. It is no longer necessary to have children to put to work on subsistence farms. Thanks to cheap, safe, convenient contraception it is no longer necessary for people to have children they don’t actually want.

    The problem is that the number of children that most people actually want is – one. That’s why people of all races in the industrialised world no longer have large families – they simply don’t want large families. They want one child.

    Industrialised society offers people all sorts of options that are, to the vast majority of people (of all races), much more attractive than raising more than one child.

    • Agree: Art, American Citizen 2.0, Sya Beerens
  225. @dfordoom

    In industrialized wealthy societies children are _very_ expensive, particularly if the parents plan to give them “the good life”.

    I think I have seen numbers close to a million dollars a child after food, clothing, child care (both parents working), college education (and for some parents private school before college), maybe an advanced degree etc. You may want a larger house if you have a child (or children).

    There is a lot you could be doing with that money….not to mention the time required by child rearing.
    Most upper middle class families spend an insane amount of time driving their kid to this activity and that activity, following their sports, etc.

    Then after that you face a modern economy that is very uncertain, and a fair number of these kids will be looking to you for support even after they finish school.

    The numbers are terrible–and at the margins of decision-making, that stuff matters.

    • Replies: @dfordoom
  226. American Citizen 2.0 [AKA "American Citizen 3.0"] says:
    @Corvinus

    I agree with Vox Day most of the time. As for the Christianity thing…

    1. The Irish and Italians were Catholics, which was a problem Northern Europe had already solved when Martin Luther promulgated Protestantism… and then there were wars between Catholics and Protestants in Europe too. So in a big way a lot of the problems in America came from allowing Catholics into the country in large numbers. Catholics are generally perceived to be loyal to Rome. That’s one of the big reasons that JFK getting elected President was so revolutionary. To date no other Catholics have ever been elected. He was universally acknowledged to be a pervert by everyone who knew him. Read up on that topic and I think you will be amazed by how much anti-Catholic sentiment there really was/is. Being a Catholic is not the same as being a Christian in America for many/most people.

    2. Most people have given up on Christianity in the nationalist movement so far as I have seen. There are still some Christian Identitarians but they were suppressed rather forcefully by the FBI in the 1980s and 1990s so you won’t see that point of view articulated very often. Same sort of issue as with Gay Rights. Many Christians were anti-gay rights in the 80s and 90s. Now almost every preacher or priest is gay. Nick Feuntes is an America First “Trad Cath” nationalist. Basically, a Catholic Fascist like Franco was in Spain. He’s the only one I know of.

    People gave up on Christianity mainly because our altruistic tendencies have been weaponized against us. We all start off with a sort of naive open-mindedness about zany people and unusual ideas and then the next thing you know the Leftists are using that spirit of altruistic open-mindedness to cram pedophilia and gay marriage and beastiality and open borders and basically any crazy thing you can think of down your throat by saying “well we have to be tolerant and inclusive and accept people who are different.” That Christian tendency to help others and be kind just gets warped into being forced to accept every perversion there is because otherwise you aren’t loving others the way god wants you to do apparently. It’s tiresome. You end up accepting anything and having no morality or identity at all in my opinion.

    Also, Christianity is a golem. A golem is a monster created by the Jews to do their bidding. Like a Godzilla sort of thing. So, we here in America were evangelized not because there is any metaphysical reason we should become Pro-Israel Zionists but ultimately that’s all we get from being Christians: Israeli foreign policy that we accept blindly. Now we have this bizarre apocalyptic worldview focused on Jerusalem that we think comes from God so we agree to fight for them and give them billions of dollars in foreign aid. We could have been evangelized into Buddhism during the Cold War but then that wouldn’t have made us all fanatical believers who would fight a nuclear war with Russia to save Israel (oops, I mean “Capitalism”). In short, we were encouraged to become Christians because we were radicalized to be cannon fodder for Israel in pretty much exactly the same way Iran pushes Islam on young people to get them to be terrorists.

    There is a real conflict among nationalists so far as I have seen over those two strains of thought: Christian vs Pagan. Some people have become pagans along the lines of the Vikings and Celts before Christianization. If you go pagan, you don’t have any moral duty to be nice to other tribes. In a tribal morality nothing you do to outsiders is considered “wrong” if it benefits the tribe. You can steal another tribe’s livestock and women for example and everyone in your tribe would think that was a fantastic boon! A lot of the complaints you read about Jewish morality is that it is in fact tribal in that same sense. King David could do anything he wanted to anyone so long as it was good for Isreal. Ulysses in the Odessey is another example of that kind of morality. And of course Nietzsche described the same issues when he talked about “slave morality” and “the problem of socrates.”

    The only reason you would become a Christian is if you haven’t already been exposed to Atheism and the Demoralization of Free Sex in the West and still wanted to preach some kind of nostalgic Universalist morality but even then you could just be a Kantian about Universalist morality and skip the Jesus stuff.

    In short, do you really believe that God commanded you to share the Gospel with everyone on earth? If not, why bother being a Christian. Everyone is looking for community. Christianity adds a heck of a lot of baggage to the idea of community when really it’s fine to just go camping with like minded friends and enjoy a sunset in peace like our ancient ancestors did before a bunch of Christians showed up and enslaved them with these goofy ideas about Sin and Jesus.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
    , @Reg Cæsar
    , @Usura
  227. dfordoom says: • Website
    @Art

    Almost everything that whites believe in is absolute nonsense.

    Correction:

    Almost everything that the 20% upper whites believe in is absolute nonsense.

    I disagree. If only 20% of whites believed all this nonsense we wouldn’t be in the mess we’re in. I suspect it’s more like 60% of whites. Among younger age groups it may be as high as 90%.

  228. Anonymous[136] • Disclaimer says:
    @dfordoom

    Hello, Mr. Doom,
    The parents and would-be parents I know would, ideally, like to have two children, a boy and a girl. But, unless they are willing to abort pregnancies — and no one I know is — they may end up with two girls or two boys and then face the decision whether or not to try again.
    Many don’t, because, as others have pointed out, children are expensive. Plus, they will dictate your lifestyle for decades: No more living in a one-bedroom apartment, hanging out at your favorite coffee shop or bar after work, meeting friends for dinner at a cozy restaurant, driving a Miata and taking long vacations to do things adults like to do. Oh, and no expensive, time-consuming hobbies.
    Many stop at one child for these reasons –if they don’t put off pregnancy until it is too late — but also because, something men may not realize, being pregnant is scary, definitely physically uncomfortable, and can be life-threatening.
    Additionally, you can go through all of this, be as careful as you can be, and lose the child through miscarriage at any time, an experience that is in no way trivial.
    Then the end of it all, the birth process, is quite traumatic. And if all goes well and you produce a healthy baby, oddly enough, you may suffer from profound depression. Certainly you will suffer from sleep deprivation and deep worries about whether your baby is healthy, mentally sound — why is he crying, why is he colicky, why isn’t he playing with the mobile above his crib, why….
    So, having gone through the experience once, you vow never to do it again. If you do become pregnant again, it’s likely to be by accident as much as by conscious choice.
    I should add that first pregnancies are usually the worst, among other reasons because it’s a totally new experience. Subsequent pregnancies become easier. But if you only have one child, you never learn that.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  229. @The Real World

    I would remain in the Heartland and since we’d be the biggest land mass, we get to keep the name America. See, it’s all settled….. ;o)

    South Dakota is looking better by the minute:

  230. dfordoom says: • Website
    @Justvisiting

    There is a lot you could be doing with that money….not to mention the time required by child rearing.

    Yep. Frankly I don’t see any way to convince people that they should give up all the nice things that they can have if they have one child (or none) in order to have more kids that they really don’t want.

  231. The past 10 or more years I’ve noticed that the ‘tribe’ has expended much energy and money putting forth ideas such as: the neo-cons are patriots who guided the US into wars that served only to diminish America’s treasury, blood and image, the ‘small hats’ are a race, the small hats are not white, speech can be a crime, , etc. etc. When one looks down at the totality of their actions, even as the small hats distance their hand, one can recognize a pattern in their works, and it all begins to look very Biblical.

  232. Corvinus says:
    @dfordoom

    “The problem is that white people like this society very much. For all its faults (and they are many) industrialised society has given us…”

    It’s not a problem, but rather a series of choices, some of which are unconscious, about how we seek to work and live with our one shot on this Earth.

    “The problem is that the number of children that most people actually want is – one. That’s why people of all races in the industrialised world no longer have large families – they simply don’t want large families. They want one child.”

    It’s not a problem, but a preference. So why virtue signal them to death about their apparent irresponsibility?

  233. Anonymous[339] • Disclaimer says:
    @dfordoom

    The reason fertility rates have collapsed (for all races) in the industrialized world is, paradoxically, because life is so good. It is no longer necessary to have children to avoid starving to death when we get old. It is no longer necessary to have children to put to work on subsistence farms. Thanks to cheap, safe, convenient contraception it is no longer necessary for people to have children they don’t actually want.

    Nice statement of a widespread assertion. Here’s a reply to it:

    When people really want something, but have no chance of getting it, they often deny that they want that thing, and ostentatiously scorn it, denying that it it is worthy of them. Aesop’s “Fox and the Grapes” is a standard illustration. It’s a common theme in romances, as well. With me, I try to be Mr. Hardcase, but all the people I’ve known who have died when they shouldn’t have haunt me. I want them to be alive, but they aren’t, and I can’t make them be. I’d like living people to stay alive, but they won’t — they do the stupidest things.
    “And while the future’s there for anyone to change,
    still you know it seems
    it would be easier sometimes to change the past.”
    Jackson Browne, “Fountain of Sorrow”, 1974

    So how can you tell whether a person values something? People are interested in food because they do things to obtain it. People value food, shelter, clothing. They value other things, too, varies with the person. A person who values something will take steps to get it and to keep it. These steps may include work or fighting or loss of status. If the person won’t lift a finger to get something, that something is not valuable to that person.

    https://www.unz.com/comments/all/?commenterfilter=Justvisiting discusses how much people must do to have children. JV’s experience matches my own, and what I’ve seen. J. Peterson discusses the same topic in: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cUwqRMTL8oc . People want children, but are limited by the clutch size problem: there is an optimal number of children to have to maximize (say) grandchildren. Have too many, and they die off before having their own children. Have too few, and the children you didn’t have don’t have grandchildren for you. It would appear that working people have what they consider an optimal number of children to maximize grandchildren — and that optimal number is small. This

    To see a criticism of luxurious life with no possibility of anything else, see:

    And here’s what’s supposed to be a critique of Western consumerism:

    So, what would you expect people to do if they didn’t want the life they could live, but couldn’t live anything else? No point in fighting it overtly — but the wouldn’t fight for it, and they’e bitch endlessly. That includes the intellectuals, and the rest of the people would believe intellectual trash because it’s “fundamentally true”, validated by their (unexpressed) experience.

    And that, I think, is why the Scandinavian countries are woke. It’s the only way they have of fighting against a system that won’t let them live. I’d guess that’s the reason for most who are woke.

    Of course, there are proximate causes — the SJWs are frantically looking for employment and their riots are resume building. Worked for the 1960s radicals. The politicians are trying to use it to retain office. The POC are trying to establish a secure foothold in White countries, which involves destroying a system that can’t fit into. Standard stuff in human history. Nomads used to poison wells and destroy all farm buildings/equipment so only they could live on the land.

    But the Whites? Industrial society is killing them, they want it gone also, just can’t quite admit it. Asked, they give your standard explanation, but they won’t fight for industrial society, won’t lift a finger for it. They don’t know what will replace industrial society, and at this point they don’t much care.

  234. Corvinus says:
    @American Citizen 2.0

    “I agree with Vox Day most of the time.”

    It’s not a badge of honor.

    “So in a big way a lot of the problems in America came from allowing Catholics into the country in large numbers.”

    Another way of looking at it is the factors for why non-Cath0lics tried to prevent them from coming into our nation.

    “To date no other Catholics have ever been elected. He was universally acknowledged to be a pervert by everyone who knew him.”

    On the same level as Trump’s sexual proclivities, but you do not hear evangelicals touting that record. I wonder why…

    “Being a Catholic is not the same as being a Christian in America for many/most people.”

    Regardless, in the current situation, white Christians regardless of denomination must set aside
    their ideological differences for the benefit of their race, correct?

    “Nick Feuntes is an America First “Trad Cath” nationalist. Basically, a Catholic Fascist like Franco was in Spain. He’s the only one I know of.”

    And he is not even a Heritage American. So why does he seemingly get a free pass.

    “People gave up on Christianity mainly because our altruistic tendencies have been weaponized against us.”

    It’s not so much as “giving up on Christianity” as it is people redefining it for themselves. And altruism is not squarely reserved for one particular race, it’s the embodiment of human beings.

    “So, we here in America were evangelized not because there is any metaphysical reason we should become Pro-Israel Zionists but ultimately that’s all we get from being Christians: Israeli foreign policy that we accept blindly.”

    I think you are giving us way too little credit here. There is an awareness of such matters.

    “Now we have this bizarre apocalyptic worldview focused on Jerusalem that we think comes from God so we agree to fight for them and give them billions of dollars in foreign aid.”

    I would argue that you are projecting here.

    “In short, we were encouraged to become Christians because we were radicalized to be cannon fodder for Israel in pretty much exactly the same way Iran pushes Islam on young people to get them to be terrorists.”

    More projection. Unless, of course, you have specific data from EVERY Christian who shares exactly your sentiments. I would gather that people became Christians because they are believers in the faith, or became converts as a result of an epiphany or traumatic life experience, or…

    “The only reason you would become a Christian is if you haven’t already been exposed to Atheism and the Demoralization of Free Sex in the West and still wanted to preach some kind of nostalgic Universalist morality but even then you could just be a Kantian about Universalist morality and skip the Jesus stuff.”

    Again, have you spoken to ALL Christians on this matter? Would they agree universally with your attitude here?

    “Christianity adds a heck of a lot of baggage to the idea of community…”

    If one is a non-believer, assuredly. But for those who adhere to the faith, it adds value and appreciation for their community.

    • Replies: @American Citizen 2.0
  235. Corvinus says:
    @Usura

    “Again, white is just a stand-in for “of majority European descent”.

    As well as people from the Middle East and North Africa.

    Of course, the hierarchy of race begs the question: If other, non-white races are inferior to “whites”’, then is there a hierarchy within the “white” race? Would not certain “white” groups be considered superior to others that seem “less white” or “not quite white”?

    Are all Finns superior to all Iberians, who tend to be of a darker skin tone? Is a low-education Swede automatically “better” than a highly-educated Greek? Did not the Romans, a “darker” Latin group, conquer and “civilize” less-developed barbarian tribes such as Britons? Was not Great Britain the product of made up of mixed peoples from different levels of that hierarchy? How would one “ethnically handicap” Romans, Angles, Saxons, Normans, Danes, Gaelic Celts, Jutes, and Frisians?

    In addition, what does “anti-white” even refer to? How are white people “anti-white”? Must all whites declare they are “pro-white”; that is, state they are part of this “tribe”? What are the consequences of those deemed “anti-white” by “pro-whites”? Are pro-white men and women more “successful” compared to anti-white men and women? Will their advice lead to a “happy and secure home life” for those deemed “anti-white”?

    I think Lucy has some ‘xplainin’ to do.

    • Replies: @Sya Beerens
    , @Usura
  236. @Miro23

    LOL the AGM-158C LRASM is an overpriced, subsonic speed POS, which is entirely typical of US missile technology these days.

    Meanwhile, Russia has the Mach 2+ rated P-800 Oniks:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P-800_Oniks

    and Russia is busily working to field the Mach 8-9 capable Zircon:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/3M22_Zircon

  237. denk says:
    @American Citizen 2.0

    Im just quoting the great Ali, shall leave it at that.

    Just occurred to me…
    Whites also sent Yellows to kill Yellows.

    http://original.antiwar.com/john-v-walsh/2013/02/03/us-goading-japan-into-confrontation-with-china/

    • Replies: @American Citizen 2.0
  238. @J Adelmen

    No, J Adelman. We are going to restore the Constitution and rule of law this November. By ballot or bullet. If the latter, we will be exterminating all communist scum like yourself. Pray for the former.

  239. American Citizen 2.0 [AKA "American Citizen 3.0"] says:
    @Corvinus

    No I don’t think white Christians should set aside their differences for the benefit of any race. I am not a Christian anyway. There is no movement to unite all of Christianity under a single banner so far as I know. We are living through a culture war or psychological terror campaign or biological attack or revolutionary violence… However you like to characterize it. The only way this can end is if someone wins. The side that compromises loses because we are all seeing our most basic values challenged and desecrated. You can’t give up any of your most basic values or else they aren’t really your basic values. Someone needs to push through a total victory or we are going to be living this way forever in a downward spiral until we are living in a third world country filled with people who hate each other.

    I don’t care about Trump’s sex life. I don’t care about hardly anything involving Trump. The psychological terror campaign we are living through is being conducted by the Democrats to annihilate the concept of civic virtue and leave in its place a sort of naked power struggle where whoever has any power at all should use that situation to harm their enemies as much as possible. That’s not Trump’s fault. Point was that we have had one Catholic president and nobody thought he was all that morally upstanding. Inspiring maybe. But not a paragon of moral virtue by any stretch.

    As for the rest of your “gotcha” approach… you might notice that I am sharing my point of view with you in detail without playing that “gotcha” game. Or you might not. I am not trying to convince you of anything by writing these comments. I write them because during these crazy times everyone should have a very clear idea of what they think about things. I treat this like a very contentious journal writing exercise. You seem to have a weirdly satanic desire to lord something over other people that bespeaks some kind of pathological psychology. It’s what the greeks would have called “sophistry” at best, as in… “here’s a thought… but then here’s another zinger!” You aren’t using reason and logic for anything other than pulling a rabbit out of a hat. Any rabbit seems to suffice for you. It’s a little idiotic and you seem to take a while to come up with these very minor insights. Maybe spend some time reflecting on your motives and aspirations in writing and open up some new vistas for yourself because you aren’t really saying anything all that interesting or thought provoking. You are just relishing being annoying apparently.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    , @Corvinus
  240. @American Citizen 2.0

    Also, Christianity is a golem. A golem is a monster created by the Jews to do their bidding.

    Like permitting Darwinism in the schools? They fought for 40 years to bring that about, and didn’t stop there. Not only is it legal to teach Darwin, it is now illegal to teach Genesis. Thanks to the ACLU and its golems.

    Now you may argue that Genesis itself is a golem. Fine. Then Arkansas and Tennessee can revive their discarded laws to require only the Nordic creation story be taught:

    Before there was soil, or sky, or any green thing, there was only the gaping abyss of Ginnungagap. This chaos of perfect silence and darkness lay between the homeland of elemental fire, Muspelheim, and the homeland of elemental ice, Niflheim.

    Frost from Niflheim and billowing flames from Muspelheim crept toward each other until they met in Ginnungagap. Amid the hissing and sputtering, the fire melted the ice, and the drops formed themselves into Ymir (“Screamer”), the first of the godlike but destructive giants. Ymir was a hermaphrodite and could reproduce asexually; when he slept, more giants leapt forth from his legs and from the sweat of his armpits.

    https://norse-mythology.org/tales/norse-creation-myth/

    Which of these stories will better catch the imagination of our children?

    Why does almost every Jew in the country support the latter view? Are you going to let a golem goy like Bill Day mock William Jennings Bryan like that?

    Why should the Scopeses and Eppersons keep their jobs, just because Jews say so?

  241. anon[477] • Disclaimer says:
    @American Citizen 2.0

    Hard to see how you are going to make this Black Supremacy thing work on a global scale if you lose it like that over some comments on the Internet. Wake me up when Africa finally produces it’s Isaac Newton after something like 5 billion babies. Hint: the fruit falls from the tree because of gravity, which is a fundamental force. That’s more of a hint than Newton got and he figured it out by candle light with a quill pen.

    Wakanda Forever.

    Hard to see how you are going to make this white-trash supremacy thing work when you’re a worthless white window licker who just lost it like that over some comment on the internet that your inferior white brain couldn’t understand. Wake someone else up when you’ve worked out that you’ll always be the same worthless white window licker, regardless of how many Isaac Newtons Africa, Europe or the planet Venus produce. Hint: No one owes you a fucking favor just because you’re white and they hurt your white racial pride. Your white Newton’s dead and of no use to you either.

    It’s good to die alone.

    • Replies: @American Citizen 2.0
  242. American Citizen 2.0 [AKA "American Citizen 3.0"] says:
    @denk

    You have an agenda, and any citation that supports that agenda must be a valid rhetorical move even if the words are nonsensical.

    Who sent you to kill who?

    LOL

    • Replies: @denk
  243. E_Perez says:

    “It’s Okay to be White”

    Too poor, too childish and too defensive.

    It isn’t even clear what the puerile catch-all term “Okay” means in this context.

    If we are unable to affirm our race, presence and achievements in more clear, positive terms we should at least avoid defending it with nonsense memes.

    • Replies: @dfordoom
  244. anon[155] • Disclaimer says:
    @Justvisiting

    If whites pay for the education of another 5 billion blacks around the world in a few decades or centuries we _might_ get another Isaac Newton.

    I guess we will have to try though….we are in all this together…..

    Or not……

    You’ll still be a retarded race baiting cunt whatever happens…..

    Or not……

  245. denk says:
    @American Citizen 2.0

    Agenda

    Like using your Indian cousins to
    kill Chinese ?

    ‘I wrote, suggesting that if we felt obliged to support India there should also be a call for renewed negotiations. We should do all we could to avoid continued conflict.

    The submission was promptly killed by my superior- David Anderson (later to be ambassador Saigon): “I fail to see it is not in the Australian interest to have the Chinese and Indians at each others’ throats,’

    https://johnmenadue.com/gregory-clark-lies-and-distortions-the-sino-indian-frontier-dispute-part-1-of-2/

    Hmm,
    Divide and Conquer.
    Sure sounds like an agenda.
    The oldest game in west’s playbook.

    • Replies: @Biff
    , @Malla
  246. In short: IT’S Okay TO BE POOR -ish🤠

  247. @Corvinus

    I’m North African and we’re (light) brown never White…

  248. dfordoom says: • Website
    @E_Perez

    “It’s Okay to be White”

    Too poor, too childish and too defensive.

    It’s very girly. It has that passive-aggressive quality that women so often display.

    It’s also kinda gay.

    It’s amusing that white nationalists, who tend to hate women, would come up with something so characteristically girly and gay.

  249. American Citizen 2.0 says:
    @anon

    I guess that one really touched a nerve with you. The internet might be more than you can handle. Consider why you are a frothing lunatic at that comment. That must happen to you in real life too. Yikes.

    The funny thing about those kinds of racially motivated insults towards white people is that they don’t actually have any effect. You can say “white trash” and insult my parentage and station in life and suchlike but it doesn’t have any force whereas we could take a black billionaire, successful in every way, and drop and N-bomb in conversation and they would lose their mind. LOL.

    I guess people are working overtime lately trying to come up with a racist slur towards white people that actually has any force. Weird that after centuries of so called oppression the only thing the oppressed can think to do is try to oppress others. Probably without realizing that that mentality is why they were oppressed in the first place.

    • Agree: MrVoid
  250. Anonymous[339] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anonymous

    Pretty much everything in you say has been true throughout human biological history. A biologically caused change in human behavior would have to be caused by a change in human biology. You don’t cite a change in human biology. Nice rationalizations: sound good, save pride, irrelevant.

    What has not changed is human response to severe stress. severe stress reduces fertility. Perhaps the best known in the West is the Irish potato famine, which caused a reduction in Irish fertility that lasted well over a century, even after the potato blight ceased to be a threat.

    The most likely cause of White fertility decline is stress, in the White case the threat of losing livelihood, or being unable to provide it for one’s children. The current riots are related to inability to provide livelihoods for the current generation of young Whites, and indicate the level of stress that Whites in general are undergoing.

    People don’t like high stress when it is involuntary. Industrial society has not removed stress; indeed, it has imposed high levels of stress. The White population has not, since the 1960s, tried to defend industrial civilization. At best, the White population thinks of industrial society as the German barbarians thought of their oak forests — something that existed independently of the barbarians or their actions (**). More usually, the White population thinks of industrial civilization as a burden.

    Here’s a showbiz statement of that “industrial society as burden”:

    And the White population, in bulk, won’t defend industrial society as it now stands — an observable fact. Remember, I was originally commenting on a posting that said Scandinavian countries, with fewest POC, are the most woke. Since they had to support a very small welfare population, you would expect that the benefits of industrial civilization would be most apparently in Scandinavian countries, and they would be least woke, would defend industrial civilization most strongly. One would expect that fertility in Scandinavian countries would be very high — it is in fact very low, which implies high stress that is being caused by industrial society itself.

    [MORE]

    I remember how surprising it was when the USSR fell. It was thought, back then, impossible for an industrialized nation so simply stop working, to become unable to feed, house, or clothe its population. Note that the USSR was not destroyed by competition with the West, nor was it entirely destroyed by depreciation of its industrial base. It was also destroyed by its industrial waste and by incompetent management that destroyed local fisheries and farmland. In short, it had a form of industrial society that was destroying its population.

    At the time, it was thought that Western industrial civilization would not be self-destructive, although both European and US fertility was declining at the time, much as the USSR’s fertility had been declining long prior to its fall. This explanation is now starting to look like a rationalization (much like your rationalizations). Note that the White population’s mortality is starting, just starting, to show serious increases in death from diseases of despair, mediated by drugs. This is an analog to the USSR’s high alcoholism.

    As with the USSR, something is going to relieve the stress. In Africa, the stress of just the outposts of White industrial civilization was removed in most places by removing the civilization and the Whites. There was no attempt at adapting the White industrial civilization (as there had been in Japan, Meiji Reformation, China, the Asian Tigers), it was simply destroyed. Nor is there any great popular movement to re-instate any kind of industrial civilization in Africa (***). This demonstrates that stress relief can be drastic indeed.

    What will stress relief look like in the West? Well, humans are a lot more biological than we think they are. Right now the women can’t have babies. They don’t like that (xx), and are pressuring the men to do something about it — exactly what they don’t know, but they want the babies (****). Recent suggestions (you can get married if you have a two income family and have the babies when you’re 45 years old, you can not get married and live on welfare while raising babies) haven’t worked out well for White women, so they are backing something else (which appears to be dumping the White men who have failed them by not bringing the babies and hoping that foreign men might do better, or at least inspire the White men to do better and bring the babies and a suitable environment for raising them).

    So the answer is, I don’t know. The women will keep pushing, and the men may eventually come up with something. A distributed industrial economy with small cities and some gardening at home might work.

    **) The comparison comes from José Ortega y Gasset,_The Revolt of the Masses_, 1930, and for a superficial description of he phenomenon, see: https://www.firstthings.com/web-exclusives/2008/07/the-mass-man

    xx) Having babies for women is something like breathing with men — it’s not all they do, but it’s something their bodies tell them to try for.

    ***) Chinese efforts in Africa will yield the same results, which is probably why China is building amphibious assault ships and equipment, and training the people needed. Lord knows an amphibious assault anywhere in East Asia would fail mightily.

    ****) I need hardly point out that the women’s vote has been crucial in shifting society towards the “welfare society” that supposedly minimizes financial risk and physical threat, but in fact has increased both. Women as a group are not good at picking policies.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  251. Anonymous[339] • Disclaimer says:
    @American Citizen 2.0

    Excellent summary of poster Corvinus’ reputation.

    • Agree: Poco
    • Troll: Corvinus
  252. @paranoid goy

    Excellent! Totally hilarious and true.

  253. geokat62 says:

    Jesse Lee Peterson asks a priest “Do You Love The Jews?”

    Description:

    “Jesse Lee Peterson interviews Father Tom Carey, priest of the Church of the Epiphany in Los Angeles. Father Carey is also a spokesman for Sacred Resistance L.A. Things get a little bit intense as the interview goes on. Don’t miss this captivating discussion!”

  254. RodW says:
    @Johnny Smoggins

    Duck Duck Go is just an inferior search engine. It doesn’t find stuff that I knew existed from previous Google searches. When I tried DDG for a month or so, I got tired of not finding stuff I knew must be on the web. When I went back to Google, why, there it was! What use is something that doesn’t work, however ‘pure’ it may be?

  255. Corvinus says:
    @American Citizen 2.0

    “No I don’t think white Christians should set aside their differences for the benefit of any race.”

    But I thought that whites are being genocided. So why would they not work together to settle their religious differences as a display of unity? However, Christianity binds together all races and ethnicities. Their faith trumps their “skin uniform”.

    “I am not a Christian anyway.”

    So that is one area that you disagree with Vox Day?

    “We are living through a culture war or psychological terror campaign or biological attack or revolutionary violence… However you like to characterize it.”

    Assuming that is the proper characterization.

    “The only way this can end is if someone wins. The side that compromises loses because we are all seeing our most basic values challenged and desecrated. You can’t give up any of your most basic values or else they aren’t really your basic values. Someone needs to push through a total victory or we are going to be living this way forever in a downward spiral until we are living in a third world country filled with people who hate each other.”

    How do you propose that white Americans accomplish this “total victory”?

    “I don’t care about Trump’s sex life. I don’t care about hardly anything involving Trump.”

    Yet you mentioned the perversion of JFK. Odd, considering that you seemingly cared enough to indicate those types of activities which, as YOU put it, “challenge and desecrate our basic values”. Would not fidelity and honesty be two of those things you find important to maintain civilization?

    The psychological terror campaign we are living through is being conducted by the Democrats to annihilate the concept of civic virtue and leave in its place a sort of naked power struggle where whoever has any power at all should use that situation to harm their enemies as much as possible.”

    Again, assuming that this characterization is accurate.

    “That’s not Trump’s fault.”

    He assuredly is not aiding in the cause to protect basic values. Now, some posters here believe because he has Jewish advisors (and a Jew for a son in law), that he is beholden to their interests. To what extent from your perspective is this assertion accurate? To what extent has their policies served Americans to be “cannon fodder” for Israel?

    “Point was that we have had one Catholic president and nobody thought he was all that morally upstanding. Inspiring maybe. But not a paragon of moral virtue by any stretch.”

    So employing YOUR logic, Trump would not meet this standard, considering that he is also (allegedly) as Christian, right? And if we lack this “paragon of moral virtue” in the White House, would not those basic values you cherish be subject to attack?

    “As for the rest of your “gotcha” approach… you might notice that I am sharing my point of view with you in detail without playing that “gotcha” game.”

    You are offering a false premise here. I am not playing “gotcha”, I am merely pointing out inconsistencies in your reasoning and requesting evidence for your claims. I am mixing in rhetoric and dialectic when appropriate.

    “You seem to have a weirdly satanic desire to lord something over other people that bespeaks some kind of pathological psychology.”

    That is more projection on your part.

    “It’s what the greeks would have called “sophistry” at best, as in… “here’s a thought… but then here’s another zinger!” You aren’t using reason and logic for anything other than pulling a rabbit out of a hat. Any rabbit seems to suffice for you.”

    Labeling someone a sophist is the stock response of individuals who would rather have their ideological opponents refrain from speaking. By declaring “false” any statement which does not dovetail with their negative outlook of their opposition, they seek to shut down discussion before it even begin. I suggest you think more critically of my statements and reflect on your own.

    “It’s a little idiotic and you seem to take a while to come up with these very minor insights. Maybe spend some time reflecting on your motives and aspirations in writing and open up some new vistas for yourself because you aren’t really saying anything all that interesting or thought provoking. You are just relishing being annoying apparently.”

    Gamma tell on your part.

  256. Corvinus says:
    @Anonymous

    “The most likely cause of White fertility decline is stress, in the White case the threat of losing livelihood, or being unable to provide it for one’s children.”

    Remove “White” and you are on point.

    “The current riots are related to inability to provide livelihoods for the current generation of young Whites, and indicate the level of stress that Whites in general are undergoing.”

    For some young whites, definitely. But for other whites, the protests are serving as stress relief by seeking to change the system in a peaceful manner.

    “At best, the White population thinks of industrial society as the German barbarians thought of their oak forests — something that existed independently of the barbarians or their actions (**). More usually, the White population thinks of industrial civilization as a burden.”

    That is YOUR generalization. It may or may not be accurate.

    • Replies: @Justvisiting
  257. @Corvinus

    seeking to change the system in a peaceful manner

    Oh, yeah….P*&^ing on folks and telling them it is raining.

    The partee is just getting started….the liquor had been ordered and the babes are on the way….

  258. Usura says:
    @Corvinus

    As well as people from the Middle East and North Africa.

    Correct, for example Iranians have relatively high amounts of haplogroup R1b. They aren’t Europeans, but are partial descendants from one of the handful of European haplogroups. But the term “white”, in vernacular American political discourse, does not reference Berbers or Iranians.

    “White” (as well as “black”) are pseudo-racial concepts, but can be cashed out in specific verifiable terms, although that is rarely done. Those definitions are historically contingent genetic clusters, not geographic, national, or skin-color groupings.

    Of course, the hierarchy of race begs the question: If other, non-white races are inferior to “whites”’, then is there a hierarchy within the “white” race? Would not certain “white” groups be considered superior to others that seem “less white” or “not quite white”?

    I never said there was a hierarchy. Yours is yet another implicit mis-characterization of white nationalism as white supremacy. They are not the same. Your whole paragraph about intra-European heirarchy is idle “gotcha” in light of your poor reading comprehension.

    How are white people “anti-white”?

    If I’m white, and I claim that all whites deserve death, I’m anti-white. That I happen to be white myself is not any sort of logical obstacle, since self-hatred is possible and common.

    Must all whites declare they are “pro-white”; that is, state they are part of this “tribe”?

    I don’t understand what the word “must” is doing in this sentence. If the question is “Must whites declare they are pro-white in order to be pro-white?” the answer is obviously no. There are millions of whites who are implicitly pro-white without realizing or declaring it, one example being so called white-flight from cities.

    Are pro-white men and women more “successful” compared to anti-white men and women? Will their advice lead to a “happy and secure home life” for those deemed “anti-white”?

    If moving to an all-white neighborhood, attending all-white schools, and networking and working with mostly other whites counts as “pro-white” the answer is undoubtedly yes, as evinced by the relatively high living standard of white majority nations and communities around the world.

  259. Usura says:
    @American Citizen 2.0

    I agree Christianity vs. pre-Christian beliefs is a major fissure in European nationalist politics, and a potential major weakness.

    Christianity was an anti-aristocratic cult which attracted both Semites and northern Europeans, two peoples united by history due to their common oppression at the hands of Rome. Its worship of gentleness, kindness, goodness, meekness, pity, weakness etc., acted as a powerful counter-balancing force to the pervasive inter-tribal violence of Europe prior to the Christian era. It adopted aspects of pre-Christian fertility cults, revolutionized European concepts about marriage, and preserved many of our sacred pre-Christian festivals and traditions in disguised form. I think it’s fair to call it both a cause of European stability and the cause of its decay. Now Europe and its children have become overly weak, and are no longer in need of the Christian tonic, indeed are no longer healthy enough to stand it (which was Nietzsche’s analysis).

    But to deny Christianity’s place in European heritage is just as wrong as the Christians who dismiss pre-Christian heathen beliefs. They are both part of the European story, both essential, and both should be honored and remembered, as stages of belief through which we have passed and will transcend into greater forms of wisdom.

    The squabbling between heathens and Christians must be overcome if whites are to unite.I view any attempt to set Christians against heathens or heathen-sympathizers in public forums as a deliberate divide and conquer technique.

    • Agree: MrVoid
    • Replies: @Corvinus
  260. PJ says:

    People disagree about the true sentiment being expressed with “It’s OK to be white.” Some claim it is simply the literal meaning of the statement, or in other words, “It’s OK for white people to exist.” Others claim it is a sly trick to push white supremacy, or in other words, “Whites are better than non-whites.”

    I think it would be interesting to write down these two sentiments, and then ask the people who object to “It’s OK to be white”, to say which of the two they agree with. In other words, we are splitting out the two possible sentiments, and considering them separately.

    Of course all of them would object to the second sentiment (about white superiority), and I would not find that objection to be very controversial, even if I personally think whites on average really are superior. But the big question is the first sentiment. Would they also be so opposed to “It’s OK to be white” that they even object to it strictly in the literal sense? Would they even disagree with “It’s OK for white people to exist”?

    I don’t know the answer to that question; but if a significant number do disagree, then war seems to be in our future.

    • Replies: @dfordoom
  261. Robjil says:

    White is a color.

    It is OK to be white paper, a white wall

    The correct term is Caucasian.

    It is OK to be Caucasian.

    Let someone write that. What will the criminals ruling us say?

    It is OK to be Asian.

    It is OK to be African.

    It is OK to be Native American.

    It is OK to be Mestizo.

    It is OK to be South Asian.

    There are lots of OKs in the world.

    I thought the criminals ruling us likes “diversity”.

    • Replies: @dfordoom
  262. @Usura

    If only there would’ve been a better way to be “White”….. like…. ethnicity and nationality…. oops too late for that?

    White: Overcompensation Black: Projection.

    My ethnicity: North African/Arab-ish

    Nationality: Moroccan-Dutch

    Race:

    Skin tone: depends on the weather

    YW

  263. Corvinus says:
    @Usura

    “But the term “white”, in vernacular American political discourse, does not reference Berbers or Iranians.”

    For Alt Righters, these two groups are not part of the equation. But for normies in that political discourse, it assuredly includes them.

    “White” (as well as “black”) are pseudo-racial concepts…”

    According to Who/Whom? One group of people insist that “white” and “black” is a social construct. Another group of people insist that race, e.g. being white and black, is based on genetics. Yet a third group of people apparently believe it is “pseudo-racial”, whatever that means.

    “but can be cashed out in specific verifiable terms, although that is rarely done. Those definitions are historically contingent genetic clusters, not geographic, national, or skin-color groupings.”

    Could you please clarify here? What are these “specific verifiable terms” you refer to.

    “I never said there was a hierarchy”.

    I know, that is why I stated it begs the question. Is there a hierarchy within the white race? Consider that historically there has been a top, middle, and lower level. Would you agree or disagree? Why?

    “Your whole paragraph about intra-European heirarchy is idle “gotcha” in light of your poor reading comprehension.”

    Actually my inquiry is seeking clarification and I am hoping you could offer insight rather than deflect.

    “If I’m white, and I claim that all whites deserve death, I’m anti-white.”

    Obviously. But my fellow whites and non-whites do not generally and repeatedly make that exact claim. So there has to be other criteria in this definition, which in reality was an example. Could you expand, please?

    “That I happen to be white myself is not any sort of logical obstacle, since self-hatred is possible and common.”

    I would say white people do not hate themselves or their “own kind” in the manner that you proscribe. More likely, that label is attached to them by white nationalists when their brethren make their own decisions about race and culture that they personally find troubling.

    “I don’t understand what the word “must” is doing in this sentence.”

    If whites do not declare through their words or actions that they are “pro-white”, what conclusion can we draw? They are anti-white, or “self-hating” in your terms. So they must make it known.

    “If the question is “Must whites declare they are pro-white in order to be pro-white?” the answer is obviously no.”

    To the contrary, a number of pro-white posters on this fine blog state they must know who exactly is on their side. Pro-white means different things to different people.

    “There are millions of whites who are implicitly pro-white without realizing or declaring it, one example being so called white-flight from cities.”

    You are making a false assumption here. There are a myriad of factors for white flight. You do realize there are people of color in the suburbs, right? And that white people live side by side with them without incident, at worst, or even work, play, and thrive, at best, in their community, correct?

    “If moving to an all-white neighborhood, attending all-white schools, and networking and working with mostly other whites counts as “pro-white” the answer is undoubtedly yes.”

    OK, but that did not answer my questions. Are pro-white men and women more “successful” compared to anti-white men and women? Will their advice lead to a “happy and secure home life” for those deemed “anti-white”? Please elaborate.

  264. dfordoom says: • Website
    @PJ

    People disagree about the true sentiment being expressed with “It’s OK to be white.”

    The people who react violently against this slogan are not objecting to the slogan itself, but to the people pushing the slogan. The slogan itself doesn’t matter.

    It’s very much like the slogan “black lives matter” – on its own it’s a perfectly innocuous statement that no reasonable person could object to. Of course the lives of black people matter. What makes the statement “black lives matter” controversial is the people pushing that slogan who have an agenda that goes far beyond such a simple anodyne sentiment. It’s the same with “It’s OK to be white” – the reaction is to the fact that the people posting the slogans are in fact white nationalists or even white supremacists.

    It’s not what these slogans say, it’s who is saying it.

  265. dfordoom says: • Website
    @Robjil

    There are lots of OKs in the world.

    If you want to get an interesting response, try something like “Women’s Lives Matter”. Will the response be positive to a statement that implies that all women’s lives matter even if they’re white? Or will the response be negative, which would require the responder to explicitly reject the idea that white women’s lives matter.

    Then see how white women react when they’re told that only non-white women’s lives matter.

    If you really want to do some triggering, how about “It’s OK to be a biological woman”. Or even more triggering, “It’s OK to be a woman with a vagina”.

    Given that white women are now facing expulsion from the Coalition of the Fringes, and are therefore going to be up for grabs as a political bloc, it could be worth trying.

    • Agree: Robjil
    • Replies: @Commentator Mike
  266. Corvinus says:
    @Usura

    “I agree Christianity vs. pre-Christian beliefs is a major fissure in European nationalist politics, and a potential major weakness.”

    Perhaps one’s faith trumps one’s skin suit?

    “Christianity was an anti-aristocratic cult…”

    That is a false premise.

    What did it take to cause the Roman aristocracy to turn to Christianity, changing centuries-old beliefs and religious traditions? Michele Salzman takes a fresh approach to this much-debated question. Focusing on a sampling of individual aristocratic men and women as well as on writings and archeological evidence, she brings new understanding to the process by which pagan aristocrats became Christian, and Christianity became aristocratic.

    “Now Europe and its children have become overly weak…”

    According to YOUR standards. Must white Europeans meet YOUR prescribed criteria as to what makes a people strong?

    “The squabbling between heathens and Christians must be overcome if whites are to unite.”

    With thousands of years of history that says otherwise, I doubt those long-standing disagreements will disappear.

    “I view any attempt to set Christians against heathens or heathen-sympathizers in public forums as a deliberate divide and conquer technique.”

    OK, and I see it as the age-old fight between believers and non-believers.

    • Replies: @Sya Beerens
    , @Anonymous
  267. Biff says:
    @denk

    Don’t forget the effort to radicalize the Uighurs to attack the Chinese.

    Followed by the effort to vilify the Chinese as human rights abusers in their efforts to de-radicalize the Uighurs.

    And don’t forget the liberal media’s help in the effort to vilify the Chinese at every level – including the stupid liberal John Oliver.

    • Replies: @denk
  268. @J Adelmen

    White is a category error devised as a rhetorical weapon by your people to justify and protect their right of self-determination and ensure other don’t have the same right. Secondly, a nation is not a geographic or social construction. To be American is to share a genetic history that traces back to the founding fathers. You can not make America great because you are not an American and not part of that nation. You are of another nation and people, engage in the tactics to attack an Americans right to self-determination is a form of war fare aggression. You become a child of lies when you believe and speak them as you have. You are a worm tongue.

  269. @J Adelmen

    We will make America Great for the very first time.

    Thus speaks the parasite in the nest. No nation was as nice to the Adelmans as the American Nation. But don’t expect the Adelmans to remember. Adelmans only remember ONE NATION. Some tried to warn America about that. They were called anti semites. They should have been called nationalists

  270. @dfordoom

    “It’s OK to be a biological woman” … “It’s OK to be a woman with a vagina”

    LOL. The trannies would go mental and tear you to pieces. Add “real” anywhere there for added effect.

  271. @Emslander

    but our “Literal Hitler” can’t even decide

    Really? You compare Trump to Hitler? You really must go read some non-Bolshevik history. What made Hitler great was his economics policy. That after the banksters of Zion ripped the economy apart with “reparations” after WW1. In 1936 the Jewry of the world declared open war on Germany, not against Hitler, but to …”eradicate the memory of Social Nationalism from human memory…” They hated his economics policy to the point where they created militias to overthrow the governement, causing the formation of the so-called Brownshirts to meet them in the streets. When it bacame too much, he rounded them up and sent them away from his own people, to places like Poland, where the Jewish mayors of Jewish communities shoved them into ghettos, complaining about the scum overrunning them. You still cannot produce one gas chamber or even a sizeable mass grave, say one thousand corpses? Four hundred?
    Trump has done absolutely nothing to free America from the Bolshevik Banksters, he is one of them, has added another couple of trillion dollars unsolocited debt, so please, tell me, how exactly is your Zionist billionaire hotellier the same as the man that lifted Germany out of abject poverty into, and we paraphrase Churchill I believe, “Germany is the best country in Europe to live in..”?
    Or are you a paid Zionist troll that sprinkles bullshit history all over other people’s conversations to keep your “holocu$e (TM) myth alive?

    • Replies: @Sya Beerens
  272. MEH 0910 says:
    @J Adelmen

    Meaning is never produced in a vacuum. Statements have historical and cultural contexts and ideology is embedded in the language we use. Written texts can produce meaning, using rhetorical devices, like metaphor and irony.

    “It’s okay to be white,” appears to be a literal, or denotative, message, but when we read it in context — against the backdrop of institutionalized euro-centrism and current anti-racist political movements like Black Lives Matter — we see that it is far from benign.

    J Adelmen Tiny Duck, you plagiarist, you cut and pasted that from this 2018 piece:

    https://byblacks.com/main-menu-mobile/opinion-mobile/item/2184-the-trouble-with-the-it-s-okay-to-be-white-campaign

  273. denk says:
    @Biff

    Its OK to be white

    BUt I cant stand gawd damned hypocrites

    UK, US, Australia and Canada scold China over Hong Kong law

    [Big mofucking SIC]

    https://www.reuters.com/article/us-hongkong-protests-britain/uk-us-australia-and-canada-scold-china-over-hong-kong-law-idUSKBN23425F

    To hell with uIghurs.
    Fuck the [[[five liars]]].

    Unlike Fake News Directed Against China, India’s Suffocation of Islam is Real

    https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/unlike-fake-news-directed-against-china-indias-suffocation-of-islam-is-real.631244/

    Not to mention the 30 millions moslems civilians killed by the [[[coalition of killing]]] itself.

  274. Robjil says:
    @J Adelmen

    Greatest freedom is freedom of speech.

    The greatest tyranny is “hate crime” for speech.

    If this “hate speech” crimes continues, humans will be jealous of animals of the forest.

    Why did humans learn to speak, if they jail each other over speech?

    There are no “white” people.

    No people is white as white paper or paint.

    A person from another planet, could not find “white” people on this color basis.

    Perhaps, we should change the color names.

    It is OK to be Pink-Gray for Northern European descendants.

    It is OK to be Olive for Southern European descendants.

    No one earth has black skin either. It is darker shades of brown.

    It is OK to be Dark Brown.

    Some South Asians and South Pacific/Native Australians are quite dark.

    Thus, this BLM should be changed to ALM – African Lives Matter.

    • Agree: Sya Beerens
    • Replies: @Zumbuddi
  275. @Corvinus

    “heathens and Christians”? Is this the internet or a time machine….

    What a dumb joke! Europeans have evolved the past few centuries…”Christian” equals: mental health issues

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  276. pre war period of NS rule needs to be looked at

    To quote from the Condensed Talmud (Protocols of Zion):
    The despotism of Capital, which is entirely in our hands, reaches out to it a straw that the State, willy-nilly, must take hold of: if not – it goes to the bottom. -P1.6
    The science of political economy invented by our learned elders -P5.6
    Capital… must be free to establish a monopoly of industry and trade: -P5.7
    …only add to the capital debt. And when this credit is exhausted it becomes necessary by new taxes to cover, not the loan, but only the interest on it -P21.4
    …so Hitler stopped the “foreign investment” nonsense, Germany suddenly prospered, and the bankers lost one customer. Then those darn Fascists and Japs started thinking they can also do it and Wham! the “axis of evil” got publisised as fact. THAT was Adolph’s sin! All the rest is boring, circular and partitionist.
    As soon as we can get the conversation around to these simple beginnings, the sooner the real revolution can start. We won’t even need guns, if our soldiers and police retain their humanity and refuse to start shooting.

  277. FB says: • Website
    @redmudhooch

    Thanks for that superb article, Hooch…

    Neoliberalism survives by destroying social cohesion

    What a strong young writer this Rainer Shea is…solid gold…

  278. Anonymous[339] • Disclaimer says:
    @Corvinus

    “Now Europe and its children have become overly weak…”

    According to YOUR standards. Must white Europeans meet YOUR prescribed criteria as to what makes a people strong?

    And, according to YOUR standards, C, he has to answer, right? You are attempting, as usual, to raise doubts by simple assertions. According to YOUR standards, that’s good. And according to YOU, YOUR standards and questions are good.

    So we end up with Corvinus usurping God’s position, Corvinus as the only person in the world who defines universal standards. Corvinus the heretic, it would seem

  279. Anonymous[339] • Disclaimer says:
    @Usura

    Don’t mind Corvinus. He’s a time wasting troll, always making contradictory assertions, apparently just for the fun of it. The “contradictory assertions” attack used to be effective, because it was thought that “logic prevails” and that logic/truth was a “common ground” that everybody could access. Today it turns out that only Western Europeans use that “common ground”. Islamics rejected it back in the 11th Century (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Incoherence_of_the_Philosophers), Judaism rejected it at some indeterminate date, preferring pilpul (Corvinus still does) (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pilpul), the Chinese thought ritual more important than objective truth (https://www.patheos.com/library/confucianism/ritual-worship-devotion-symbolism/rites-and-ceremonies), Buddists introduced epistemology into logic and ended up with an unproductive system (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buddhist_logico-epistemology) .

    A Western European / British demonstration of one way to refuse the use of logic and the “neutral ground” is given at length by Lewis Carrol, worth reading as it’s entertaining, see: http://www.ditext.com/carroll/tortoise.html

    So attempts to be lucid and meet on common rational ground cannot force acceptance today — too many participants simply don’t recognize that there is a common ground, and any of them can refuse entry.

    Unfortunately, that leaves only one common ground, the one that is being used by Antifa in Portland and quite a few other cities worldwide. And so it goes.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  280. Zumbuddi says:
    @Robjil

    White is not a color, it is the presence of all of the colors in the spectrum.

    • Agree: Robjil
  281. Corvinus says:
    @Sya Beerens

    “”Christian” equals: mental health issues.”

    According to Who/Whom?

    • Replies: @Sya Beerens
  282. Corvinus says:
    @Anonymous

    “And, according to YOUR standards, C, he has to answer, right?”

    Actually, according to the standards of white people who oppose the Alt Right or white nationalism. It’s WE, not ME.

    “So we end up with Corvinus usurping God’s position, Corvinus as the only person in the world who defines universal standards.”

    Trigger much?

    “Don’t mind Corvinus. He’s a time wasting troll, always making contradictory assertions, apparently just for the fun of it.”

    The reality is I back up my assertions. Try keeping up.

    “too many participants simply don’t recognize that there is a common ground, and any of them can refuse entry”

    You are attempting, as usual, to raise doubts by simple assertions. According to YOUR standards, that’s good. And according to YOU, YOUR standards and questions are good.

    Right back at you, friend.

  283. @Anonymous

    Absolutely Z’rael is not to be trusted, but it’s unclear what they have to gain from “extra” American dysfunction. Orange Situation Watcher already does their bidding so they don’t need to install biden.

    China will never bend to Z’rael’s will. If they wish to serve Chosenites it will be for their own reasons.

    Chosenites can’t blend into the backdrop of Asian nations, a good thing since diversity is a crippling weakness.

    • Agree: American Citizen 2.0
  284. Corvinus says:
    @Sya Beerens

    So Europeans say “Christian” equals mental health issues?” Really?

    Seems to me that you offered a flippant response.

    OK, so what is the percentage in your estimation? What leads you to that conclusion? What sources do you have to back it up?

    • Replies: @Sya Beerens
  285. Being white is not just “Okay” it’s pretty fucking awesome….

    • Replies: @dfordoom
  286. @Corvinus

    ”The Italians and the Irish were the original problem. They could have, and should have, been handled like the Chinese were. But they laid the groundwork for the Jews, the Germans, and the Scandinavians, who made things even worse. And they paved the way for the Mexicans, the Africans, and the Muslims. At this point, the USA probably can’t get back to 1986, let alone 1965.”

    What a load of crap. First of all, his chronology is way off. There were many Germans in the colonies prior to the revolutionary war starting, hence “Pennsylvania D[e]ut[s]ch”. Ben Franklin even wanted to make German a second official language. The major wave of Irish and Italians started about a century later.

    Secondly, the aforementioned groups (except the jews) didn’t “make things worse”, they colonized the Midwest that Vox grew up in. None of those groups save the jews advocated for African/Mexican/Muslim immigration. Vox is a lying sack of zionist shit who will ban you for mentioning his author’s role in The Sampson Option (Van Creveld) but will gleefully D&C any other white groups.

    • Replies: @VinnyVette
  287. dfordoom says: • Website
    @VinnyVette

    Being white is not just “Okay” it’s pretty fucking awesome….

    I’d be inclined to agree. But then I look at the white antifa thugs. I look at the white people promoting the LGBT agenda. I look at angry blue-haired white feminists. I look at white people getting all excited about the prospect of more wars. I look at white billionaires promoting civilisation-wrecking policies. I look at white politicians who are corrupt and cynical. I look at white journalist whores.

    I’m fine with the idea that being white is OK. I’m white and I’m OK with being white. But I find it a bit difficult to think of white people as pretty fucking awesome. Whites are OK but they’re no better, and no worse, than anyone else. Some whites are pretty fucking embarrassing to be honest!

    • Agree: bruce county, Liza
    • Replies: @Biff
    , @Anonymous
    , @VinnyVette
  288. @Corvinus

    It’s a cultural thing. “Christian” means either Jehovah’s witness or Bible belt inhabitant. “Catholic” means: baptized, Carnaval, Communion, and Christmas.

    “Muslim” means: “allochthonous”.

  289. Corvinus says:

    “It’s a cultural thing. “Christian” means either Jehovah’s witness or Bible belt inhabitant. “Catholic” means: baptized, Carnaval, Communion, and Christmas. “Muslim” means: “allochthonous”.”

    As I figured, you’re making up things as you go along, and completely avoided the question. How did you arrive to the conclusion that Europeans say “Christian” equals mental health issues?”

  290. Anonymous[339] • Disclaimer says:
    @dfordoom

    But I find it a bit difficult to think of white people as pretty fucking awesome. Whites are OK but they’re no better, and no worse, than anyone else. Some whites are pretty fucking embarrassing to be honest!

    Whites have found out that the industrial system they invented won’t let them have kids enough to replace themselves. They have no idea of what to do about that, so they are complaining about whatever comes into their heads. And yes, it is embarrassing. one is almost tempted to say that the Whites have gneiss brains, if one wanted to use the lowest form of wheat.

    • Troll: Corvinus
    • Replies: @dfordoom
  291. @Art

    You’ve still got it backwards. Greece and Rome built some magnificent buildings which were lost to time. During most of it’s time, Christians could not understand how the Romans could build such marvels; many thought they were built by giants. Eventually Christianity managed to build some magnificent cathedrals, but not long after that it started to tear itself apart in factional infighting. The enlightenment was a rejection of Christianity precisely because they had seen unsolvable religious disputes leading to some of the bloodiest wars the world has ever seen. Only after religion was abandoned did the west surpass its old peak under Rome and spark an industrial revolution.

    • Replies: @dfordoom
  292. Liza says:
    @Anonymous

    They cluck like impotent hens while white SA males are murdered.

    That would be the roosters who are impotent. 🙂

  293. Sam J. says:
    @American Citizen 2.0

    “…All of the genetic evidence uncovered over the last 40 years or so point very clearly to the facts that “Europeans” mainly introgressed with Neaderthals whereas Africans introgressed with another type of humanoid entirely…”

    I wouldn’t count on this being even remotely true. The person most pushed as an “authority” on this that says people, not Black, are 5% or so Neanderthal is a Jew. Notice the Jew trickery that he “averages” all races and says the result is 5%. He DOES NOT BREAK OUT the results. My understanding is he guards his data and does not openly publish it. I suspect the Jews are extremely high in Neanderthal and Cro-Mags(Whites) are not or have very little.

    To further add evidence to this idea the Jews have almost completely destroyed the ideas behind skeletonal, head shape and other physical characteristics being related to heritage and even more so to psychology and behavior. If you want to know what the Jews are doing sometimes it’s best to pay attention to what they are trying bury.

    And finally really Jewy Jews look just like Neanderthals. Long trunks, short legs, skulls just like Neanderthals. I suspect the reason the Neanderthals were wiped out is…they acted like Jews and were so despicable and psychopathic that the Cro-Mags eventually decided to wipe as many of them out as they could. The ones that survived holed up in mountainous areas. Eventually coming back out as Jews.

    The only way to deal with these Neanderthal lying despicable psychopathic Jews is get rid of them. Boot them out of your countries and never allow them access in any form again.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
    , @Anonymous
  294. Sam J. says:
    @Anonymous

    “… Fact: industrialization hasn’t been good for the industrialized populations _when considered as populations_…”

    This postulate doesn’t fit the facts at all. In the 50’s when we were vastly more industrialized people were happy to have jobs and a great future of ever increasing prosperity. It’s DEINDUSTRIALIZATION and increasing lack of future that’s the problem.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    , @Anonymous
  295. Corvinus says:
    @Sam J.

    “The person most pushed as an “authority” on this that says people, not Black, are 5% or so Neanderthal is a Jew. Notice the Jew trickery that he “averages” all races and says the result is 5%.”

    And you know this “trickery” because…

    “I suspect the Jews are extremely high in Neanderthal and Cro-Mags(Whites) are not or have very little.”

    Could you break out your results here? Obviously, you have specific data from your own studies, correct? Or are you lying yourself? How Jewish. /facepalm

    “Jews have almost completely destroyed the ideas behind skeletonal, head shape and other physical characteristics being related to heritage and even more so to psychology and behavior.”

    You are oddly vague here. It’s as if you have little to no scientific training on your part.

    “I suspect the reason the Neanderthals were wiped out is…they acted like Jews and were so despicable and psychopathic that the Cro-Mags eventually decided to wipe as many of them out as they could.”

    So, in essence, you are wildly speculating.

    “The only way to deal with these Neanderthal lying despicable psychopathic Jews is get rid of them.”

    OK, so now you’re in charge of this “booting out”. How do you plan on ensuring this course of action becomes a reality? You seemingly have all of the answers.

  296. Anonymous[339] • Disclaimer says:
    @Sam J.

    Your hypothesis seems a bit far fetched, but it does explain this otherwise bizarre video:

    Why such rancor about a theory concerning Neanderthals, who were extinct long before Moses was born or God spoke to Abraham? “Zorkmid” says nothing at all about T. Rex, who is also extinct and said to be a predator. The rancor suggests some perceived connection by “Zorkmid” between “Zorkmid” and the Neanderthals. Why else would “Zorkmid” bother?

  297. Anonymous[339] • Disclaimer says:
    @Sam J.

    Right up until the 1950s, the US European descended population was growing apace, taking over new territory, inventing new devices and applying them to industry. The industrialization of the Gilded Age changed the United States, ethically and organizationally, into something that could be pushed into the politics of the 1960s, which led to the current decline. In PC language, industrialization produced a “mass man” that almost completely lacked agency, and could be manipulated into self destructive policies that led to the present anomic individual. Industrialization was thus bad for the industrialized populations.

    Nobody knows how to counter this bad effect. Policies employed thus far have been counterproductive. Political money given to the cities has destroyed the cities. Attempts to “save jobs” have destroyed jobs. Attempts to give everybody an equal vote made, for several decades, urban voters the only important voters. Etc.

    Why does everything go wrong, and what would go right? That’s the current question, and that’s what the riots, votes for Trump, Black denunciations of Antifa, grossly counterproductive shutdowns of all business, etc. are about — thrashing around for a new system because the one we had was killing us.

  298. dfordoom says: • Website
    @Anonymous

    Whites have found out that the industrial system they invented won’t let them have kids enough to replace themselves.

    Or perhaps whites (and everyone else in industrial societies) have discovered that the industrial system means they no longer need to have many kids.

    I think we have to accept the possibility that for most people this is a feature, not a bug. We have to accept the possibility that most (not all but most) people like the industrial system they invented.

    Which means that finding a way to increase birth rates to replacement levels will be a challenge. Not an impossible challenge but very difficult politically.

    The one thing we can’t do is abandon the industrial system, because most people like it. We need to make improvements to the industrial system because ditching it is not an option.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  299. dfordoom says: • Website
    @NobodyKnowsImADog

    The enlightenment was a rejection of Christianity precisely because they had seen unsolvable religious disputes leading to some of the bloodiest wars the world has ever seen. Only after religion was abandoned did the west surpass its old peak under Rome and spark an industrial revolution.

    There could be something in that.

    I think it needs to be acknowledged that by the 18th century European civilisation was in many ways post-Christian.

  300. @Anon

    the remaining Whites in South Africa have been placed on the genocide watch in a category higher than anyone else has been before.

    lol at the smooth-brained imbeciles who believe this.

  301. Anonymous[339] • Disclaimer says:
    @dfordoom

    The one thing we can’t do is abandon the industrial system, because most people like it. We need to make improvements to the industrial system because ditching it is not an option.

    OK, this is an area of agreement between us.

    I maintain that we (or at least those descended from Western Europeans/British Isles) are, in fact, abandoning industrial society. The abandonment consists in part of:
    a) ideological opposition to industrialization, “wokeness”, which justifies the remaining items on this list.
    b) discouraging populations that are essential to industrialization to reproduce well below replacement rate.
    c) Government control of industry that spends industrial revenue for political ends, and results in depreciation of both capital equipment and labor.

    I would count ending the above practices as an improvement in the industrial system What would you count as an improvement in the industrial system?

    Note that I also regard ditching the industrial system as an unmitigated disaster, which would stand a good chance of reducing world population to pre-industrial levels of about a billion people, and doing so rather suddenly as such things go — taking maybe a decade or three (30 years is the usual duration of very large wars). I would like to avoid that, and I suspect that you would as well. How best to avoid that, given our starting point as of 2020/08/01?

  302. dfordoom says: • Website
    @Anonymous

    b) discouraging populations that are essential to industrialization to reproduce well below replacement rate.

    I don’t buy the idea that below-replacement fertility is the result of an encouragement to stop breeding. It doesn’t make sense because all races and all ethnicities in all developed countries are well below replacement fertility. Exactly who is discouraging Singaporeans and South Koreans from breeding?

    I believe that low fertility in developed countries is simply the result of people having more attractive options than child-rearing.

    How can that problem be solved? Maybe COVID-19 is going to solve that problem for us. If lots of universities shut down permanently that will certainly improve the situation. We need university education for maybe 10% of the population. For everyone else it’s not merely useless but harmful. University education is a sacred cow. Politically there’s no way to shut down those unnecessary universities but COVID-19 might just do the job for us.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  303. dfordoom says: • Website
    @Anonymous

    What would you count as an improvement in the industrial system?

    We need to attack the two-income family. We need to make it possible for women to give up working when they marry. Which means we need to make it possible for a man to support a wife and children on his income alone. Which means wages (after tax) for married men need to increase. Housing costs need to be reduced. Healthcare needs to be aff0rdable for single-income families. That should increase fertility rates somewhat.

    We need to attack the idea that a university education is a basic human right. We need to attack the idea that a university education is necessary for everyone. If only 10% of the population went to university the financial burden of having children would be reduced for those single-income families. That should increase fertility rates at least a little.

    We need to provide job security for married men. The biggest factor that is going to discourage people from having children is financial insecurity – most notably the fear of losing jobs. Birth rates were high back in the era of jobs for life. Job security would be another factor that would result in at least a modest increase in birth rates.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  304. @Anonymous

    I just ordered my 2021 Bronco… I want it. So I want the industrial machine to chug along until it is delivered.

  305. @dfordoom

    I agree with your assessment to the point that I could have written it myself!
    Yes sickening isn’t it?
    That said, I’m not going to let the bad apples spoil the bunch!
    Since I myself do not apply to any of those categories, I will continue to hold my head high and be proud of the positive accomplishments and contributions of our race that have benefitted all of mankind!
    I, nor you, are responsible for the aberrant thoughts and behaviors of others!
    Hold your head high brother!
    Fight the good fight!

  306. @NobodyKnowsImADog

    Great rebuttal to the tool who wrote that asinine comment re: “Italians and Germans.” There were many more Jews on the American continent (banking / mercantile), before the wave of German, Italian, Irish, immigration of the early 20th century. Did his WASP founding stock keep the Jews out? Obviously not!
    How about the Jewish slave traders his WASP ancestors dealt with who wrought upon us “the white man’s burden?”

    • Agree: NobodyKnowsImADog
  307. @cassandra

    Apologies for not responding sooner. That strange thing called “work” has occupied my time… as opposed to all of those antifa faithful who beaver away protesting the system that allows them so much time to, well, err… protest! LOL.

    I agree with your observation. Still, it is necessary to fight back and fight back mightily or else witness everything be swept aside by lunatics

  308. Jean says:

    I am proud to be white and of the accomplishments of Catholics and white Americans.

    • Agree: VinnyVette
  309. Anonymous[339] • Disclaimer says:
    @dfordoom

    It doesn’t make sense because all races and all ethnicities in all developed countries are well below replacement fertility.

    Doesn’t work that way.

    In the US, Black population has about doubled since AD 1960, white population (even including Hispanics) is about the same. Same thing with recent immigrant populaiton vs. the White locals in Western Europe. In an industrialized country, the less a group has to do with industry, the higher the group’s fertility rate.

    Why?

    Working to sustain industrial society conflicts with having children. The more one works for industrial society, the fewer children one has. This is so fundamental that women are lied to about how much a job/career interferes with having children.

    But what about men? Men can work at job/career while their women have children, right?

    Nope.

    [MORE]

    Women can raise children without a man present and participating?

    No, again. If the man pays all bills but is not present, the kids do no do very well.

    Historical example: Child labor in coal mines was originally the idea of the mothers, because entire families worked together in the mines — mothers with the children with the father. Prohibiting child labor destroyed that, and separated the family. Mothers were, generally, against that.

    Contemporary industry puts severe stresses on a family. The higher the salary, the more stress, the more hours. This means fewer children. It also means more disturbed children. On top of that, current policy is not to promote the children of successful groups in corporations — Whites, now, but note that East and South Asians were counted as White when engineering personnel were depicted as all White. The end result is below replacement fertility.

    Groups on welfare, however, tend to have above replacement fertility. I had a case of that more or less rubbed in my face. A friend of my daughter got pregnant, her boyfriend offered to marry her, and the friend was advised to turn the man down (I met him, he was pretty decent) because the welfare payment would be more than he could give her. The mother was a fairly shrewd and independent person, and apparently thought a life on welfare superior to one married to a working man.

    So: I’ve heard the standard answers (the one you’re given), and they just aren’t true.

    Given that, what to do? Driving essential personnel into extinction is clearly a bad thing. How to avoid that? Greatly reduce welfare and break up large organizations? If no, why not? If you can’t tell the welfare recipients that they can’t have chidren, how can you justify an industrial structure that tells those who staff it that they can’t have children?

    • Replies: @dfordoom
  310. Anonymous[339] • Disclaimer says:
    @dfordoom

    All of the factors you mention were in full force back in the 1950s. They delivered what you say they delivered.

    Howver — the 1950s system proved vulnerable to the agitation of the 1960s. The industrial personnel at all levels proved unable not only to defend their system from serious attack, but even to discuss it. I we returned to that, we would get the same attack and the same result.

    The industrial system in the 1950s was an unstable equilibrium after WW II. In the early days, the New Deal had apparently intended to destroy or nationalize the major corporations, and was prepared to destroy the Judicial Branch to do so. World War II made that plan infeasible. It was obvious that the US could not win the war without industrial output from the major corporations. In practice, the New Deal send all wartime production orders to the major corporations and drove the smaller companies out of business. Corporations considered enemy, most notably the US railroads, were forced to consume their capital stock and not permitted to repair depreciation after the war.

    The post-WW II equilibrium was thus both new and unstable. It was not a triumph of the American system, it was a command economy pretending to be a Mussolini type fascist government (“mixed government”), but in fact intending to destroy the corporations. Which it did, after the 1960s, by not permitting them the legal or financial latitude to recapitalize or innovate. The one exception, electronics/microelectronics/computers, was given to new firms that were loosely regulated at first.

    OK. So, my point is that the industrial system of the 1950s was not stable — it had already been shown unable to defend itself. Government was going to extract enough money from the corporations to destroy a possible rival power center and to (as it happened) preserve the Democratic urban strongholds by transferring money to cities under the Civil Rights law of 1964, and importing poor POC under the immigration law of 1965.

    So the 1950s form of industrial organization you described is not replicable today.

    On the mixed side, things that can’t go on don’t. The government has destroyed the large corporations. GE, Ford, General Motors — all welfare recipients. Pan Am, US Steel — gone. Boeing — hollow shell, soon to shuffle off the stage, hiding its face. No more money to take. Moreover, the poor people imported under the 1965 immigration laws want to run the cities themselves, can toss out the existing governments, but can’t actually govern (viz: CHAD/CHOP/FLOP/STOP in Seattle). The current system is over. However, there isn’t any obvious replacement.

    Next step would be a self-defending industrial system that can keep itself from being looted by government and keep some control over living conditions for its staff. How to get such a system, while getting something like the 1950s conditions that you describe above for their staff?

    Not that the 1950s were all sugar and spice — see: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steel_strike_of_1959

    • Replies: @dfordoom
  311. dfordoom says: • Website
    @Anonymous

    OK. So, my point is that the industrial system of the 1950s was not stable — it had already been shown unable to defend itself….

    So the 1950s form of industrial organization you described is not replicable today.

    You’re talking about two different things. The social and political tensions which undermined the 1950s status quo had nothing whatsoever to do with industrial relations policy (wages, job security, etc) which was what I was talking about.

    It was the US political system that failed, dragging the world into the Cold War and then dragging the US into Vietnam. And turning race relations into a political issue.

    The industrial system was perfectly sound.

    The 1950s form of industrial organisation I described is perfectly replicable today. All it needs is the political will. Unfortunately too many people on the Right are wasting time and energy on unrealistic pipe-dreams like white ethnostates. The policies I’m proposing are much more realistic and politically viable than white ethnostates and mass deportations.

  312. dfordoom says: • Website
    @Anonymous

    It doesn’t make sense because all races and all ethnicities in all developed countries are well below replacement fertility.

    Doesn’t work that way.

    Yes it does.

  313. Anonymous[339] • Disclaimer says:
    @Sam J.

    This postulate doesn’t fit the facts at all. In the 50’s when we were vastly more industrialized people were happy to have jobs and a great future of ever increasing prosperity. It’s DEINDUSTRIALIZATION and increasing lack of future that’s the problem.

    No, can’t agree. The reduced fertility is an observation of emperical fact, not a postulate (https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/postulate). Industrializaiton of non-Western countries has reduced fertility to below replacement levels. Sure, in the US after WW II, ” we were vastly more industrialized people were happy to have jobs and a great future of ever increasing prosperity. ” That was just about as you say. The propaganda that finally gave government public approval of its control of all capital expenditures was that the US wasn’t getting more prosperous quickly enough, so the Federal Government would take over and speed up the process. In actual fact, the Federal Government proceeded to divert capital flow to political ends, and the increase in prosperity came to an abrupt halt by 1970, when the transition was almost complete.

    Even in the 1950s there were problems. The large corporate methodology of “rotating managers through the corporation” may have been necessary from a corporate standpoint, but it produced a managerial class that had no political connection with the United States, nor any personal constituency within the corporation. Rotation is common historically in totalitarian organizations under central control, and, while it greatly reduces local revolts, it also produces a government not only indifferent to but actively unaware of living conditions for the general public. In such an environment, attention to anything more than career is fatal to the career.

    So when government started demanding that corporations hire patronage employees and put them in charge of hiring, the corporations had literally no political base with which to resist those demands. Now the corporations don’t even bother pretending — they are simply political agents of the Federal Government.

    But that’s another part of this. The reduction of fertility by industrialization is a well established observation, not a postulate such as “parallel lines never meet”.

  314. Malla says:
    @denk

    JFK sent Nehru to attack China

    Proof????

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  315. Malla says:
    @denk

    Indians do not need Whites to send us to kill Chinese. The Indian masses hate China (I am not one of them). Go to Times of India and read the comments. You do not understand India.

  316. Malla says:
    @American Citizen 2.0

    He is bullshitting. JFK had no hand in sending Nehru (Indian PM) against China, Invasion of China was an Indian deep state decision. Nehru was very pro Soviet before the 1962 war, did not get along with the USA. it was India’s enemy Pakistan which was closure to the USA. it is only the debacle of the war which brought him closer to America as the USSR was neutral and could not help much.

  317. Anonymous[252] • Disclaimer says:
    @Getaclue

    No, this is wrong. Jews are safer among fractious antisemites than they are among united philosemites. This is because the antisemites will never be capable of concerted action against them, whereas the philosemites may one day unexpectedly change their minds and crush them.

  318. It “is” okay to be white…Frosty seems to think so.
    I wonder when they will remake Frosty The Snowman with black Frosty.

    https://th.bing.com/th/id/OIP.6KdDXzy4LmCfoCYqxX-h4gHaE7?pid=Api&rs=1

  319. Anonymous[339] • Disclaimer says:
    @Malla

    JFK sent Nehru to attack China

    Proof????

    Nehru was killed while trying to climb the Great Wall. JFK should have sent somebody younger, or at least more agile.

    • LOL: Malla
  320. frontier says:

    Don’t mind Corvinus. He’s a time wasting troll, always making contradictory assertions, apparently just for the fun of it.

    It’s hard not to notice him, he sticks out like a sore Antifa thumb separated from the fist. Corva is very focused on trying to create internal divisions & to provoke infighting, it’s an obsession of his with an apparent preference for pitting WASPs against everyone else… it’s a dead giveaway, right out of Alinsky’s playbook: “the organizer’s first job is to create issues or problems… to rub raw the resentments of the people of the community” That’s also his weak spot though, every mention of Whites as a loosely cohesive group drives him nuts.

    Your observation about the “common ground” is a good explanation for his apparent fears – the various white ethnicities share enough common ground to be capable of compromising and understanding each other, something that threatens the outsiders’ tactic of divide and conquer.

  321. PolarBear says:
    @Corvinus

    Irish were here before Italians. Grouping Euros and )s together is cowardice.

  322. Even in Ireland, the communists are trying to say that its “too white”. LMAO. Laura Weinstein had an opinion letter published in the Irish Echo saying that Ireland needs to diversify, that its too white. She runs a site called the “Irish Maven”, she’s not Irish at all, but American Jewish, who got a degree in Irish Studies when they still had such a program, Irish-Americans apparently can’t get into the program. Lol. She heard a Pogues song and “fell in love” with the culture. Sure, she did. It would be like me falling in love with Jewish culture and getting a degree in Jewish studies, then saying that there were too many of that persuasion in Israel. Absurd. But, they are going after Ireland, read up on Cerebus buying up property there.

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Greg Johnson Comments via RSS
PastClassics
Analyzing the History of a Controversial Movement
The JFK Assassination and the 9/11 Attacks?
Becker update V1.3.2