The Unz Review - Mobile
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 Tobias Langdon Archive
In the Land of Lies
Seeing, Saying and Pseudotopia
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>
Culture of critique by a Black enricher
Culture of critique by a Black enricher

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New Reply
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

It seems such an obvious truth: In regione caecorum rex est luscus — “In the land of the blind the one-eyed man is king.” But the English writer H.G. Wells turned the proverb on its head in his short-story “The Country of the Blind” (1904), one of the cleverest and most profound ever written. Wells’ story describes a sighted mountaineer who, while climbing in the Andes, discovers a hidden valley where the inhabitants have been blind for generations.

Seeing is Sinful

Does the sighted mountaineer become king of the valley? Far from it. Socially speaking, his faculty of sight isn’t merely a disadvantage but a dangerous curse. The blind tribesfolk are not impressed by his claims to possess an additional and superior sense:

He spoke of the beauties of sight, of watching the mountains, of the sky and the sunrise, and they heard him with amused incredulity that presently became condemnatory. They told him there were indeed no mountains at all, but that the end of the rocks where the llamas grazed was indeed the end of the world; thence sprang a cavernous roof of the universe, from which the dew and the avalanches fell; and when he maintained stoutly the world had neither end nor roof such as they supposed, they said his thoughts were wicked. (“The Country of the Blind”)

It turns out that, in the land of the blind, the two-eyed man is a heretic. It would be even worse in a land where, for religious reasons, people merely pretended to be blind. Or rather: it is indeed worse in a land of pretended blindness. Britain is like that. So is the rest of the ethnically enriched West. It is heretical to comment on certain highly visible aspects of the world. Instead, we have to pretend that they’re not there and either remain silent or state the opposite of the truth.

“There is only one race — the human race!”

Britain is not a Utopia but a Pseudotopia — a Land of Lies. The biggest and foulest lies swirl in the vast sewer of what the left would call “racial discourse.” Here are a few of those lies:

  • There is only one race — the human race.
  • All races are equal in intellectual, moral and civilizational potential.
  • Mass immigration from the Third World enriches the stale pale nations of the First World.
  • Any White resistance to ethnic enrichment must be crushed before it leads to a Second Holocaust.
  • When non-Whites fail, it can only be because of White racism.
Stephen Lawrence, Black martyr
Stephen Lawrence, Black martyr

These lies are reinforced constantly by every medium of official propaganda and public education, but sometimes the storm of mendacity rises to a hurricane. Britain has experienced one of those hurricanes in 2018. First, this year is the twenty-fifth anniversary of the martyrdom of our new patron saint, St Stephen Lawrence, the Black teenager who was murdered by a White gang in London in 1993. Second, the government is accused of mistreating members of the so-called Windrush Generation, that is, the saintly non-White immigrants who began arriving in Britain after the Second World War.

Never let reality intrude on ideology

The first ship to carry these immigrants was called the Empire Windrush. In the words of the dedicated virtue-signaller Jeremy Corbyn, the immigrants came here “to rebuild” the country. Corbyn’s words were echoed by Gary Younge, the Guardian’s chief Black intellectual, who said that the Windrush Generation “came here from the Commonwealth to rebuild Britain.” Not to help rebuild Britain, but to rebuild it all on their ownsome, despite being, in those distant days, a tiny fraction of the population. In other words, they were supermen and superwomen, armed with miraculous powers that made any one of them worth many thousands of mere British Whites. Or so Corbyn and Younge are pretending. After all, the left never let reality intrude on ideology.

And the reality, of course, was that the non-Whites of the “Windrush Generation” were of low average IQ and came from clannish, corrupt cultures with no history of economic success or intellectual achievement. They were not suited to life in an advanced technological society and the ordinary Whites of Britain objected loudly to their presence right from the beginning. Britain’s treacherous elite responded to these White objections by passing harsher and harsher laws against free speech and free association.

Roy Hattersley and his Jewish wife
Roy Hattersley and his Jewish wife

The so-called Labour party, which was founded to champion the White working-class, instead sided with the elite and the predatory capitalists who benefited from cheap labour. And Labour was proud of its treachery. Just look at Roy Hattersley, a former deputy leader of the party who served as MP for the working-class Whites of Sparkbrook in Birmingham. He has boasted that “For most of my 33 years in Westminster, I was able to resist Sparkbrook’s demands about the great issues of national policy — otherwise, my first decade would have been spent opposing all Commonwealth immigration and my last calling for withdrawal from the European Union.”

Britain is not a democracy

We can be certain that Hattersley joined loudly and enthusiastically in the chorus of execration that followed Enoch Powell’s so-called “Rivers of Blood” speech in 1968. Powell spoke up for ordinary British Whites, opposed mass immigration, and became the most popular politician in the country. But Britain isn’t a democracy and he was driven out of respectable society by the treacherous elite. Roy Hattersley summed up the attitude of the elite when he asked this rhetorical question: “Should I, in 1964, have called for what a clear majority of my constituents, and most of the country, undoubtedly wanted — the repatriation of all Commonwealth immigrants?” His answer: of course not. He did not want the majority to have any say in their nation’s future. But if Britain had been a democracy, there would have been no need for repatriation, because the non-White “Commonwealth immigrants” would never have arrived in the first place.

Unlike Britain, the East European nation of Hungary is a democracy. Its people have been given a chance to say whether or not they want to be enriched by non-White immigration. Their answer has been a decisive no: they have just voted overwhelmingly to re-elect their anti-migration prime minister Viktor Orbán, who has become the Enoch Powell de nos jours. He is a hate-figure for Europe’s xenophilic elite, who constantly ask: How can Orbán say that non-White and Muslim immigration would be bad for Hungary when Hungary has never experienced it? It’s an extremely stupid and disingenuous question. Orbán and millions of other Hungarians know that non-White immigration would be bad for their nation because they can see what it has done to Britain, France, Sweden and Germany. Unlike those enriched nations, Hungary does not suffer from suicide-bombing, rape-gangs, female genital mutilation and exotic Third-World diseases. If Hungary allowed mass immigration, it would certainly acquire those pathologies.

Hungarian hate-thinker Viktor Orbán
Hungarian hate-thinker Viktor Orbán

“Objective news about migration…”

To the left, it is deeply shameful that Orbán should oppose mass immigration by pointing at its bad effects on Western Europe. This an extract from one of the many anti-Orbán articles published by the Guardian:

“Hungarians are bombarded by fabricated news about migration and shameless xenophobic propaganda on a daily basis,” said Kornel Klopstein, who has helped set up what has become the Nyomtassteis movement, which prints its own newsletters containing information to counter the government propaganda. … “Bringing objective news about migration to people can help them to make better decisions in the upcoming elections,” said Klopstein. (‘Ghettos and no-go zones’: Hungary’s far right fuels migrant fears ahead of vote, The Guardian, 28th March 2018)

Kornel Klopstein does not agree with the Hungarian majority, so it’s interesting that he does not have a Hungarian name. Is he Jewish? The “poet and translator” George Szirtes is certainly Jewish and has attacked Orbán again and again in the Guardian. For example, he’s claimed that Hungary is on the verge of becoming a full-blown autocracy and that Orbán is “invoking every antisemitic trope in the book” in his criticisms of the pro-migration Jewish billionaire George Soros. Another Jewish writer, Gideon Rachman, wrote in the Financial Times that Orbán’s criticisms of Soros are “laden with anti-Semitic imagery.” It’s odd, then, that the Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu congratulated Orbán on his victory. Netanyaju does not support anti-Semitism.

Jewish Good-Thinker Gideon Rachman
Jewish Good-Thinker Gideon Rachman

And what does the SJW Kornel Klopstein mean by the phrase “objective news about migration”? I assume that he means the ludicrous propaganda peddled by SJWs in the West. For example, the Guardian has breathlessly reported that “German initiatives are equipping new arrivals with the skills to alleviate the country’s worker shortage.” Yes, an “Afghan cop” has become a “German nurse,” so we don’t need to worry that most new enrichers in Germany are unqualified or even illiterate and that White German taxpayers could be facing a bill of a trillion euros to cover welfare, housing and medical care for those enrichers.

Schwimmen Macht Frei

As I said: the left never let reality intrude on ideology. For another example, meet a German SJW called Günter Schütte. According to the Guardian, he has found a magic key to turning clannish, corrupt Third-Worlders into model citizens of an advanced First-World society. Herr Schütte is, in the Guardian’s entirely straight-faced words, “Germany’s first swimming instructor to specialise in helping to cure refugees’ fear of water.” The article continues:

[W]hen Schütte realised that many refugees who arrived in Wolfsburg were families from countries with little open water, and that many children had been traumatised by the journey across the Mediterranean, he decided that swimming could become a tool for better integration. … If Schütte thinks that swimming can help young asylum seekers find a path in the country they now call their home, it’s because he believes that water doesn’t just counteract the pull of gravity. The pool is meant to be a faith-free zone. “In my swimming course, religion has to go to the back of the queue,” he says over a plate of pasta with pumpkin ragout prepared by his wife. “We swim together, no matter what people believe in. That is something that is very important to me and that I am very frank about.” (How swimming lessons change the lives of refugee children, The Guardian, 21st April 2018)

Problem solved! This kind of idiocy has to be taken seriously in Pseudotopias like Britain and Germany. In Hungary, by contrast, politicians speak the truth about mass immigration and xenophilic Jews like George Szirtes and Gideon Rachman do not have a decisive influence on immigration policy. If Jews did have a decisive influence, Hungary would open its borders to the Third World and begin to suffer all the pathologies of non-White enrichment: mass murder, rape-gangs, dead cartoonists, honour killings, female genital mutilation, grope-festivals, in-breeding and exotic diseases.

Anti-Racism Kills Blacks

Hungary would also acquire two new state religions: Holocaustianity and minority worship, both of which are flourishing in the Pseudotopia of Britain. At the heart of minority worship here is the martyr-cult of our new patron saint, St Stephen Lawrence. He was the victim of a very rare crime: White-on-Black murder. Just as in the United States, most inter-racial violence in Britain, from murder to rape, is committed by non-Whites against Whites, despite non-Whites still being a minority of the population. The left is not interested in this statistical truth or the reality of anti-White predation and hatred that underlies it. Instead, the left is interested in power. The martyr-cult of Stephen Lawrence is admirably suited to advancing the power of the left.

But the martyr-cult is not at all suited to protecting ordinary Blacks from violent crime. In the United States, the self-righteous activists of Black Lives Matter have been responsible for thousands of unnecessary deaths:

We’ve been repeatedly assured over the last two years that there is no such thing as a Ferguson Effect, that Black Lives Matter couldn’t possibly be contributing to a higher homicide rate. We’ve also been assured that it’s all very complicated and it will take years to disentangle.

Also, the homicide spike isn’t at all national, it’s just in a few cities like Baltimore and Chicago. As I point out below, the latest Chicago surge in murders began in January 2016, immediately after or coinciding with four BLM-driven triumphs of liberalism over the Chicago Police Department from late November 2015 to early January 2016.

But Chicago is murky compared to Baltimore, where the current high rate of homicides can be dated to April 27, 2015, the day of the BLM riot over Freddie Gray’s death. This may be the single most clear-cut case in the history of social science. … (Well, There’s Your Problem Right There, Baltimore, Steve Sailer, 28th September 2017)

Something similar happened in Britain after the MacPherson Report, an enquiry into the death of Stephen Lawrence that described the Metropolitan police in London as “institutionally racist.” The police stepped back from policing Blacks and more Blacks were murdered as a result. Violent crime against Whites also rose and the MacPherson Report undoubtedly made the police even less willing to act against the non-White rape-gangs at work in places like Rotherham and Oxford. Furthermore, the Report, commissioned by the highly authoritarian New Labour government, allowed that government to abolish the “800-year-old” legal safeguard against double jeopardy, or repeated prosecution for the same crime.

Gerontophile rapists and triple-murderers

In short, the martyr-cult of Stephen Lawrence has been extremely bad for Britain. But any mainstream politician or journalist who dared to say so would be treated like Enoch Powell and driven out of respectable society. Instead, ordinary Whites are supposed to writhe in shame every time the mournful features of Doreen Lawrence, the martyr’s mother, appear in the British media. It’s a surreal situation, because Lady Lawrence, who was ennobled by the cuckservative David Cameron in 2013, came to Britain from the extremely violent and corrupt Black nation of Jamaica, where the police carry out “hundreds of illegal killings” every year, according to the impeccably liberal Amnesty International. Official propaganda insists that Black Jamaican immigrants have made a “massive contribution” to Britain.

Doreen Lawrence and her Trotskyist lawyer Imran Khan
Doreen Lawrence and her Trotskyist lawyer Imran Khan

And indeed they have: for example, they have committed a vastly disproportionate number of murders and rapes here. The gerontophile Delroy Easton Grant, who raped scores or even hundreds of elderly White women, came to Britain from Jamaica. So did Theodore Johnson, who performed the remarkable feat of murdering three of his female “partners.” So did the violent gang that used the rape of White women as an initiation rite. But those Jamaican over-achievers flash through the British media like meteors, briefly glimpsed and then gone for ever. Stephen Lawrence and his mother, by contrast, are permanent fixtures in the political firmament, blazing forth as symbols of Black victimhood and White villainy.

The Ruling Stones

But Doreen Lawrence isn’t very intelligent and didn’t become prominent by her own efforts. She is the leading figure in the martyr-cult, but she didn’t create the cult or ensure its permanency in British public life. Instead, just like the NAACP in the United States, the martyr-cult was a Jewish creation. Its guiding intellect was the cold and calculating Dr Richard Stone, a former head of the Jewish Council for Racial Equality and a dedicated advocate of the need for Jews and Muslims to unite, as “natural allies,” against their shared White Christian oppressors.

Mainspring of the martyr-cult: Dr Richard Stone
Mainspring of the martyr-cult: Dr Richard Stone

Alas, Dr Stone’s work to forge a Jewish-Muslim alliance has been far less successful than his work to promote the martyr-cult of Stephen Lawrence. Dr Stone has very effectively promoted the lie that Whites are an ominous and ever-present threat to the well-being of non-Whites. The truth is completely the opposite. Non-Whites are a massive threat to Whites, not vice versa. They are also a massive threat to each other. In the twenty-five years since Stephen Lawrence was martyred, thousands of Blacks have been murdered by other Blacks in Britain. In 2018, Blacks and other non-Whites form the vast majority of those both committing and falling victim to knife-murders and acid attacks in London.

“Yo blud, wot you mean?”

All of this is a direct result of mass immigration, as the journalist Mary Wakefield has admitted in the cuckservative Spectator:

In the [London] Evening Standard, Wayne, an ex-gangster from Plumstead, gave an interview in which he explained that the resettled kids from war zones had upped the ante in gangland. ‘In the last ten years, since the Somalis and the Congolese came to London, they taught us a whole new level of violence. These people had seen family members mutilated, so when they said, “I’m gonna smash you up”, us guys would be shouting, “Yo blud [i.e., blood-brother], wot you mean?” and they would just pull out a blade and juk [stab] you in the chest. It upped the speed and level for us British-born guys. We had to arm up to protect ourselves. It created an upward spiral.’

Not Amber Rudd, not Sadiq Khan nor Theresa May would ever speak publicly about this, for fear of seeming racist. But isn’t that in itself racist? It implies that the problem is somehow to do with skin colour, when any poor kid forced into a civil war might well be brutalised by it. We absolutely have a duty to offer asylum to children fleeing horrific circumstances, but we also have a duty to acknowledge the increased dangers the police face as a result. If we don’t, these multiply. (An odd new feeling has crept up on me — sympathy for the police, The Spectator, 21st April 2018)

Why do we “absolutely have a duty to offer asylum to children fleeing horrific circumstances”? In fact, we don’t have any such duty at all. To suggest otherwise is mawkish virtue-signalling that would have been dismissed with contempt not only by that great conservative hero Winston Churchill, but by all mainstream politicians well into the twentieth century. Somalia and the Congo are a very long way from Britain and the “children fleeing horrific circumstances” passed many safe places en route to this country. Now that they are here, they are reproducing the savage and barbarous culture of their homelands.

Virtue-signalling and vibrancy

Is that a surprise? Not to anyone with eyes in their head and brains between their ears. But in the Land of Lies, the wilfully blind are King. And I’m sure that the virtue-signalling Mary Wakefield and her family rarely, if ever, encounter that Somali and Congolese culture at first hand. They will live at a safe distance from the enriched areas of London, allowing the “absolute duty” of welcoming enrichers to fall on other people.

But let’s give the Spectator some credit: it also publishes the Islamophobe Douglas Murray, who has criticized Muslim immigration and even gone so far as to mention the Jewish role therein. He has recently asked a very important question: “Why do politicians refuse to tell it how it is on immigration?” Sadly, his answer was wholly inadequate. The subheading to his article ran: “It is the one issue where our leaders deny the wishes of their citizens.”

That’s like saying that food is the “one issue” where a dog-owner denies the wishes of his dog. If the dog wants food and doesn’t get it, then the owner proves that he is unfit to own a dog. He is failing to meet the dog’s most basic and important need. Similarly, if politicians “deny the wishes of their citizens” on immigration, they prove not only that they are unfit for office but that they are acting with conscious treachery. Immigration is not just “one issue” among many: it is, as Enoch Powell pointed out half-a-century ago, of vital, existential importance, altering a nation and its future in the most direct and intimate way.

Resisting the will of the people

Recall the Labour politician Roy Hattersley, who stood for parliament promising to serve the White working-class in the Birmingham constituency of Sparkbrook. Once elected, he chose to betray his constituents. Decades later, he openly boasted of his treachery in the Guardian: “I was able to resist Sparkbrook’s demands about the great issues of national policy — otherwise, my first decade would have been spent opposing all Commonwealth immigration.”

Hattersley called immigration a “great issue of national policy” because he knew it bore directly on the nation’s future. That was in the 1960s; today the future has arrived. Britain is an authoritarian surveillance state vibrant with the non-White pathologies of terrorism, rape-gangs, violent crime and political corruption. It is a Land of Lies where free speech is dying and the wilfully blind are King. Our new state religion of minority worship insists that Britain has been vastly enriched by mass immigration from violent, corrupt Third-World nations.

For example, where would the National Health Service (NHS) be without doctors and nurses from the Third World? Well, the NHS would be like the rest of Britain: far better off. Non-White doctors and nurses are far more likely to be corrupt and incompetent, particularly if they have acquired their qualifications in such hotbeds of cheating and fraud as India, Pakistan and Nigeria. Britain was the birthplace of modern medicine in the nineteenth century, when highly intelligent and competent Whites like Joseph Lister and Florence Nightingale began to reform a profession that had formerly done more harm than good to its patients. British medicine did not need non-Whites then and does not need them now. The NHS would be better off without them.

“Guilty until proved guilty”

But that is a truth that cannot be spoken. Minority worship is as rampant in the NHS as it is in parliament and at the BBC. White doctors may see that their non-White colleagues are incompetent or corrupt, but they must not act on the evidence of their lying eyes. If they do, they will share the fate of a White surgeon called Peter Duffy, who discovered that Whites who face allegations of racism in the NHS are “guilty until proved guilty”:

Consultant NHS surgeon voted Doctor of the Year ‘was forced to quit his job after three Asian colleagues branded him a racist when he raised concerns about their work’

A consultant NHS surgeon who was voted ‘Doctor of the Year’ was forced to quit his job after being branded a racist by three Asian colleagues, a tribunal heard. Peter Duffy, 56, alleges he was the subject of racism allegations from two Indian consultants Dr Kavinda Madhra and Dr Ashutosh Jain and Pakistani Dr Saleem Nassem.

Dr Duffy told a tribunal he reported one doctor for being unable to use an ultrasound machine, missing ‘several’ cancers and playing golf despite being asked to treat a patient with deadly sepsis. He also said he raised concerns over another he believed had bungled operations and been involved in overtime fraud. But the University Hospitals of Morecambe Bay NHS Trust consultant urologist claimed at a tribunal yesterday he was subjected to ‘malicious, toxic and utterly false’ allegations from the three men over his ‘whistleblowing’. …

In a statement given to the Manchester employment tribunal Mr Duffy who is being advised by the whistleblowing charity Public Concern at Work, said he had suffered from heart problems as a result of his treatment and now had ‘chronic’ post traumatic stress disorder. He claimed another senior colleague had stood down after claims of racism were also levelled against him and added: ‘I believe a clear and sustained campaign of victimisation, vilification and disinformation was aimed at me by the clinicians who were responsible for the clinical errors, avoidable deaths and excessive, probably fraudulent work that were the subject of the my repeated protected disclosures. …’

In his statement Mr Duffy added: ‘It is difficult to overstate the sheer toxicity of these utterly false allegations. I was warned in my first few months in the Trust that I must at all costs avoid an allegation of racism against me. I was told that such allegations, even if entirely unwarranted can destroy careers and that the NHS tended to regard racism allegations as “guilty until proven guilty”. Unfortunately, I was unable to defend myself during this particular meeting, being entirely unaware that I was under attack or that the meeting ever took place until I was unemployed.’ … (Consultant NHS surgeon voted Doctor of the Year ‘was forced to quit his job after three Asian colleagues branded him a racist when he raised concerns about their work’, The Daily Mail, 19th April 2018)

Mass immigration harms White nations not only by increasing crime of all kinds. It also destroys the competence, efficiency and harmony of White institutions, from the health service to the justice system. After all, why would incompetent doctors from an ethnic minority admit their own faults when they can make a highly effective accusation of racism instead? Minority worship means that non-Whites are automatically privileged over their supposed White oppressors. The former Chief Rabbi Jonathan Sacks has pointed out that Britain’s institutions have been “poisoned by the rise of identity politics, as minorities and aggrieved groups jockeyed first for rights, then for special treatment.” He even admitted that “the process … began with Jews, before being taken up by blacks, women and gays.”

A false accuser is honoured in Israel

But Rabbi Sacks has been contradicted by the verbose and self-righteous Jewish novelist Howard Jacobson, who has claimed that it would be “sacrilege” for Jews to make false or self-serving claims of anti-Semitism. I think that Jacobson is talking self-deluded nonsense. The Jewish mega-fraudster Robert Maxwell, born Ján Hyman Binyamin Hoch, made repeated accusations of anti-Semitism against those who accused him of fraud and malpractice. These accusations undoubtedly helped Maxwell-Hoch continue and extend his enormous financial crimes. And when he was exposed as one of the biggest fraudsters in history, did the Jewish community condemn his “sacrilege”? Not in the slightest. Maxwell still lies buried on the Mount of Olives in Israel, honoured for his work on behalf of the Jewish state. False accusations of anti-Semitism are very useful to Jews, just as false accusations of racism are very useful to non-Whites throughout the West.

That’s why we see so many hate-hoaxes in Pseudotopias like America, from false accusations of Islamophobia on the New York subway to false accusations of gang-rape at the University of Virginia. At least, sight-criminals like Steve Sailer see the hate-hoaxes. The mainstream media don’t. As Sailer points out, “hate-hoax” isn’t recognized by the mainstream media even as a concept, let alone a widespread reality. But Greg Cochran, another sight-criminal in America, is wrong to speak of “fools,” “barking-mad craziness” and “demented gate-keepers” when he criticizes those who insist on absolute racial equality and the Psychic Unity of Mankind.

Crypsis is not crazy

There is nothing crazy about cultural Marxism, which has steadily and remorselessly tightened its hold on the Western world since the end of the Second World War. As we can see from the careers of Stalin and Mao, denying reality can even be advantageous to ideologues. If you have reality on your side, you may be complacent about victory and feel inclined to be magnanimous to your opponents. If you don’t have reality on your side, you know that the key to victory is not truth but deceit, censorship and intimidation. Cochran condemns “the lies” of men like Stephen Jay Gould, Richard Lewontin and Ashley Montagu. But lying is a highly effective strategy in competition, as all biologists should be well-aware. Stick-insects are not really sticks and hornet clearwings are not really hornets.

Living by lies: a stick-insect
Living by lies: a stick-insect

Instead, they’re defenceless insects that have protected themselves for millions of years by lying to the eyes of hungry predators. Ashley Montagu followed a similar strategy of crypsis, or concealment of one’s true nature. His name — Montague Francis Ashley-Montagu in full — sounds like that of an Old Etonian dandy, heir to an ancient earldom and many acres of Scottish grouseland. That’s not the image conjured by his real name of Israel Ehrenberg. Like Gould and Lewontin, Montagu was Jewish. That’s not a coincidence: Jews have been the hardest-working and most effective promoters of Pseudotopia.

America would not be a Land of Lies without them. Nor would Britain, France, Germany and Sweden. If we want to save the West, then the Land of Lies must turn into the Land of Eyes. We must see racial reality and act on what we see.

Appendix: Martyr-Cults That Didn’t Make It

Liberals claim to be deeply concerned about racism, sexism and bullying. They are lying. In fact, they are deeply concerned about advancing their own power and feeding their own narcissism. That’s why the following victims of violent hate-crime have never prompted martyr-cults like the one that surrounds Stephen Lawrence.

  • Lucy Lowe, 2000 — a sixteen-year-old English schoolgirl murdered with her mother and sister in an arson attack. The arsonist had been raping her since she was thirteen and had made her pregnant at fourteen. She was pregnant again to him at the time of her death, but feminists did not publicize her murder, there was no official enquiry, and no martyr-cult now surrounds her. Why so? Because Lucy Lowe was White and her murderer was a vibrant Pakistani Muslim. (More here)
  • Kriss Donald, 2005 — a fifteen-year-old Scottish schoolboy abducted by racist thugs simply because of the colour of his skin. After hours of terror, he was repeatedly stabbed, soaked in gasoline, set on fire and left to die in agony. The racist thugs had been emboldened by police inaction against their previous crimes, but anti-racists did not publicize the murder, there was no official enquiry, and no martyr-cult now surrounds him. Why so? Because Kriss Donald was White and his murderers were vibrant Pakistani Muslims. (More here)
  • Kimberly Fuller, 2005 — a nineteen-year-old English girl who was pinched on the buttocks in a nightclub. When she objected to this assault, she was stabbed in the neck by the man responsible and bled to death. Feminists did not publicize her murder, there was no official enquiry, and no martyr-cult now surrounds her. Why so? Because Kimberly Fuller was White and her murderer was a vibrant Pakistani Muslim. (More here)
  • Laura Wilson, 2010 — a seventeen-year-old English girl who, with the full knowledge of the authorities in her home-town of Rotherham, had been “groomed” for sex from the age of twelve by violent misogynists. After her abusers tired of her, she was repeatedly stabbed and thrown into a canal to die. Feminists did not publicize her murder, there was no official enquiry, and no martyr-cult now surrounds her. Why so? Because Laura Wilson was White and her murderers were two vibrant Pakistani Muslims. (More here)
Valaree Schwab, not a martyr
Valaree Schwab, not a martyr
  • Valaree Megan Schwab, 2018 — a sixteen-year-old American schoolgirl who was subject to repeated bullying by a bigoted gang who didn’t like her taste in music. When she tried to stand up to the gang outside a food-shop in New Jersey, she was stabbed twice in the torso with a steak knife and died later in hospital. Anti-bullying activists are not publicizing the murder and we can be confident that there will be no official enquiry and that no martyr-cult will ever surround her. Why so? Because Valaree Megan Schwab was White and her murderer is Black, like the rest of the gang that bullied her. (More here)
(Republished from The Occidental Observer by permission of author or representative)
 
Hide 101 CommentsLeave a Comment
101 Comments to "In the Land of Lies"
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. Janets says:

    Hear, hear, Mr Langdon, I applaud you. Thank you for speaking the truth so clearly and cogently. Alas, no-one in power will listen, you will be condemned and vilified as a hate-filled racist, and we ordinary English will continue to suffer.

    I am simultaneously enraged, shamed by and saddened at what has been done to my once-great country. I used to be proud to be English, now I’m proud only of our long and glorious history, not of what we are today. Brexit gave me hope for a short while, but that hope is long gone now.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Georgiaboy61
    @ Janets

    I am an American, but one who has always considered himself something of an Anglophile.

    Winston Churchill is in my pantheon of personal heroes for his role in saving western civilization from the scourge of Nazism - but equally so for his prescient warnings concerning Islam, which he made over a century ago as a young man.

    Despite the nastiness of that family quarrel which began in 1776, our two nations have much in common. We Yanks ought to see what is happening in today's Great Britain as a cautionary tale, since the globalist elites have the same in store for us as they have done to you. Why do you think their assault upon the First, Second and Fourth Amendments to the Bill of Rights have been so fierce?

    As for your nation, fight for her - if not for what she is now, then for what she once was - and perhaps may be again one day.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc.
    AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
    These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
    Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
    More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  2. Dan Hayes says:

    Hear Ye, Hear Ye:

    Ron has continued God’s work by again republishing from The Occidental Observer, the sanctum sanctorum of forbidden thought!

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  3. Already in 2010 the German economist Sarrazin, member of the Board of the Bundesbank, the German central bank, wrote that immigration destroys Germany.
    Intelligence is hereditary, immigrants with low IQ’s have many children, German women with high IQ’s none, or just one.
    German industrialists know what German export is ‘wir exportieren Intelligenz’, ‘we export intelligence’, they mean that German products are sold worldwide because they are better than most others.
    Sarrazin was fired immediately.
    Thilo Sarrazin, ‘Deutschland schafft sich ab, Wie wir unser Land aufs Spiel setzen’, München 2010
    As to the country of the blind, I have the book, it was an island, but maybe the story was changed.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  4. Miro23 says:

    “As you make your bed so you must lie in it”

    Back in the day, the British could have resisted Cultural Marxism like the East Europeans are doing now, but while they were partying and opening the gates in the 1960′s, the E. Europeans were getting first -hand experience of Totalitarian lying government and they remember how it worked.

    Read More
    • Replies: @lavoisier

    Back in the day, the British could have resisted Cultural Marxism like the East Europeans are doing now, but while they were partying and opening the gates in the 1960′s, the E. Europeans were getting first -hand experience of Totalitarian lying government and they remember how it worked.
     
    I think to blame the British people for the crisis they face is a little unfair.

    The people have been betrayed by their elites. This story provides evidence that it was the leaders of Britain who destroyed the country by opening up the floodgates to immigration while ignoring the wishes of the people they were supposed to represent.

    But lots of blame to go around for sure and a lot of the usual Jewish mischief.

    I still believe the only hope to turn this mess around is for the people who actually value their nation to get very angry at what has been done to them in the name of a utopian fiction.

    If you are not really angry you are not paying attention.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  5. Realist says:

    Anti-bullying activists are not publicizing the murder and we can be confident that there will be no official enquiry and that no martyr-cult will ever surround her. Why so? Because Valaree Megan Schwab was White and her murderer is Black, like the rest of the gang that bullied her.

    Self hating Whites allow this.

    Read More
    • Replies: @lavoisier

    Self hating whites DO NOT hate themselves.
     
    They hate other white people who do not subscribe to their leftist dogma that all people are equal (except the white people who do not believe this and should just die) and that people of color are sacred.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  6. We stale pale males are indebted to Windrush. All those strong, empowered, sassy black women I see every day are their legacy. My physics professor, my NHS doctors, my friends I call on to stop White or Hindu thugs mugging and burgling me are all their descendants.

    Rudd deserves to go, for whosoever insults them is worse than Adolph. Replace her with one of the ultra clever, refined Cambridge-educated intellectuals like Diane Abbott to teach YT a lesson. I’m only surprised institutional racism stops more Abbots going to Oxbridge.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  7. Gordo says:

    Pretty much all true. Pretty much all forbidden speech in UK.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  8. Anon[283] • Disclaimer says:

    In regione caecorum rex est luscus — “In the land of the blind the one-eyed man is king.”

    Or the outcast. Depends upon his primary drive being social status and power or on the flip side truth and truthfulness.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  9. Anon[283] • Disclaimer says:

    But the English writer H.G. Wells turned the proverb on its head in his short-story “The Country of the Blind” (1904), one of the cleverest and most profound ever written.

    “Look around you,” said the citizen. “This is the largest market in the world.” “Oh surely not,” said the traveller. “Well, perhaps not the largest,” said the citizen, “but much the best.” “You are certainly wrong there,” said the traveller. “I can tell you….” They buried the stranger in the dusk.

    FABLES, ROBERT LOUIS STEVENSON, 1850–1894

    SEEING IS SINFUL

    “They are playing a game. They are playing at not playing a game. If I show them I see they are, I shall break the rules and they will punish me. I must play their game, of not seeing I see the game”

    LAING, Knots

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  10. Hacienda says:

    You mean colored people are actually nothing more than stick insects!
    I never knew. I gotta kill myself now.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  11. anonymous[340] • Disclaimer says:

    Suppression of free speech, once successful, is difficult to document. But another way to realize its pervasiveness is to look for propaganda tucked into the work of supposedly dissident authors who are, in fact, part of the Establishment infrastructure. Time and again, you’ll find otherwise needless disparagement of foreign leaders who aren’t compliant as “dictators,” etc. See Mr. Buchanan’s April 20 column, “Why the Authoritarian Right Is Rising,” and several of the comments about that in the context of Hungary.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  12. Mr Langdon should be praised for sheeting home blame for immigration issues to where they belong: Elites (& their “chosen” enforcers & enablers).
    However, his use of such categories as “left” & “right” is of questionable value…although, no doubt there are many who still enjoy the thrilling cut & thrust of debating profundities such as the “Coke v Pepsi” saga.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Sane Left Libertarian

    his use of such categories as “left” & “right”
     
    As a self-described leftist I must agree. SJW deplore actual leftists - the fair wage/pro-union/healthcare for all leftists. The OP even makes mention of it

    The so-called Labour party, which was founded to champion the White working-class, instead sided with the elite
     
    The US Dems were in charge for more than a half century on such a platform. Now the Hillary fan sites are filled with vitriol toward not only working class whites, but anyone who dares to say that those people are just as important as blacks and refugees. And then of course they will blame the next election loss on real liberals who won't vote for the Clinton/Schumer/Pelosi party.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  13. Randal says:

    If we lived in a free country, a piece like this could and would be published in one of the mainstream conservative outlets. We do not, and it could not.

    Read More
    • Agree: mark green
    • Replies: @Curtis Mouser I
    Yet dumb White sportscuck men still pay Sky to brainwash them.
    , @Tyrion 2
    Nothing like this piece has ever been published in a mainstream media source of any type in the whole history of Britain, the country that invented the free press.
    , @republic
    A serious question to Uk readers: would posting this on facebook in the UK be a crime today?
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  14. Jake says:

    Wait a doggone minute – I’ve been told my whole life by the Elites that England created rule of law and democracy and fairness. I’ve been told that all good things flow from Anglo-Saxon history. If that Anglo-Saxon sense of history and culture crammed down my throat is valid, then we all should be celebrating what the WASP Elites of the UK and the US have been doing for decades to flood their realms with non-whites and non-Christians, and then grant them special rights and privileges, thereby shackling at least the poorer half of their white underlings.

    Long term, that is suicidal, the kind that Elites can ignore until the very end because they seem to be above it.

    And that is not a strange new deviation from WASP culture: that is WASP culture.

    Anglo-Saxon Puritanism was a Judaizing heresy. It is impossible to take Judaizing heresy out of WASP culture. Oliver Cromwell making alliance with Jews, taking Jewish money and allowing Jews back into England with special rights and privileges, was done precisely to secure the money needed to wage war to batter into total submission all non-WASP natives of the British Isles. It was WASP allied with Jew to destroy all other whites.

    All secularized forms of Anglo-Saxon Puritanism have contributed to that process. And as the British Empire was the largest and wealthiest in world history, and as the USA merely took over administration of that original WASP Empire, the mess was spread across the globe.

    WASP culture is playing out toward its end game, which Archetypal WASP Oliver Cromwell realized deep in his black heart: ally with Jews to destroy all white Christian cultures.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Joe Correa
    YAAawwnn!

    Same problem in France, Italy and Spain yet they are overwhelmingly Catholic.

    Find another, more fitting and not so laughable theory to clear Jewish influence or stop boring the internet with your half baked nonsense.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  15. A great article slaying many shibboleths. It hits so many true points and the quotes from HG Wells’ story would have impressed Enoch Powell

    It is spoiled only by the opening of paragraph 7 which frankly is racist “And the reality of course was that the non-whites of the Windrush Generation were of low average IQ and came from clannish corrupt cultures” I think that is unfair and disrespectful to those first generation Commonwealth citizens who came. The immigrants from the Caribbean wore suits and ties, spoke good ‘non-rap’ English, and actually respected white England – which is why they wanted to come in the first place. They also came to do jobs, not seek benefits The problem is what has happened to black communities since – in Britain, in Jamaica and in the US. The irony has been the greater the pandering – the money, the adulation, the sheer attention paid to those black communities and worst of all the justification of failure as down to white racism (which doesn’t seem to affect Indian or Polish communities for instance), the more they have failed and deteriorated in terms of education, language, culture and crime. And no one wants to see it, let alone say it.

    As for Stephen Lawrence there have been c 130 knife deaths in London this year and the first 4 months of this. None of them will be remembered for more than 5 minutes outside their own immediate families because they were killed in black-on-black killing. The same is true in Baltimore, Chicago and Kingston. Black Lives Matter, at least to the media, only when they are killed by whites

    As for the talk about the swimming pool being free of religion, maybe someone can talk to our High Court who decided last week that the North London Coroner had discriminated against Jewish and Muslim families by not prioritizing their inquests which would allow them to be buried the next day. We are all equal but in modern day Britain some are more equal than others – and its not poor white trash.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  16. I now live in a small town in northeastern America, which for the last decade or so has come to resemble Tijuana or Ciudad Juarez (I know, because I once lived in a city in northern Mexico called Los Angeles for 30 years).

    What you can witness here, in a lickety-split period of time, is not cultural enrichment but a growing hispanic and black sunami of murder, rape, drugs, domestic battery and child molestation not to mention all the third world drunks who have killed local residents with their cars or their kids who hack each other with machetes during schoolyard fights. I also lost a family member, a middle-aged stockbroker, to an illegal Mexican who stabbed him in the heart during a robbery attempt.

    The conversation among whites here is locked in an eternal loop:

    “We need to get out of here…”

    “Yeah, but where you going to go, it’s the same everywhere…”

    In the meantime, the Judenstat has placed loudspeakers every ten feet across the city. They blare in unison every five minutes with an order to accept what is being done to our communities. Followed by a command to hit your knees and kiss Anne Frank’s gold-plated ass. Or else.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  17. This cracks me up. I remember when they used to say this stuff about dagos and wops. And it was always fussy little pencilnecks who were scared the foreign devils were better than them in the sack. My condolences for your floppy little dick, whitey.

    Come on. What kind of pantywaist objects to a wider variety of sex partners?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Joe Correa
    Indeed, what kind of person objects to a wider variety of exotic restaurants and sex partners and more vibrant street markets?

    One with enough brains to understand and use the concept of net benefit to his advantage, you dim-wit.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  18. Randal says:

    “In my swimming course, religion has to go to the back of the queue,” he says over a plate of pasta with pumpkin ragout prepared by his wife. “We swim together, no matter what people believe in. That is something that is very important to me and that I am very frank about.”

    The amusing doublethink of the SJW on display here. The reality almost certainly is that Gunter Schutte would be the first to try to exclude from his swimming course, to silence, and indeed probably to try to get locked up, anyone who expressed political opinions that offend against the ideologies of political correctness – anti-racism, anti-anti-Semitism, anti-”homophobia” etc.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  19. @Randal
    If we lived in a free country, a piece like this could and would be published in one of the mainstream conservative outlets. We do not, and it could not.

    Yet dumb White sportscuck men still pay Sky to brainwash them.

    Read More
    • Replies: @nsa
    The flat screen joo box in every American living room relentlessly pushes negro worship and homo worship. Sometimes the vile jooies jokingly combine both of these perverted idolatries into one homoerotic entertainment.......for example, "football". Giant muscle canary negroids in plastic hats and tight pants chase and grope each other and perform jungle dances, while tens of thousands of obese homocucked whites scream girlie style in orgasmic ecstacy. The yids are laughing their asses off as they get even richer off their kept masses of goy boy asses.....
    , @SunBakedSuburb
    "sportscuck"

    Perfect term to describe the white male addiction to black-dominated corporate sports. I may borrow it occasionally.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  20. Carlos32 says:

    Having a debate about the logic of immigration policy is pointless and rather outdated by more than a decade.

    The bottom line is the western elites have rather obviously been using immigration to eliminate national identity. Among other things pushing the whole minorities agenda to divide society into small controllable groups.

    Rights like freedom of speech have been suppressed and will continue to do so to achieve this goal

    Any debate that ignores this obvious fact is borring and pointless. You might as well be talking to your hand.

    Read More
    • Agree: Seamus Padraig
    • Replies: @renfro

    The bottom line is the western elites have rather obviously been using immigration to eliminate national identity. Among other things pushing the whole minorities agenda to divide society into small controllable groups.
     
    ''...to eliminate national identity''.....is ((their)) agenda.

    Add to that the constant drum beat of the evil white man responsible for all the world's evils.


    French writer Jean Francois Revel wrote,....... “Clearly, a civilization that feels guilty for everything it is and does will lack the energy and conviction to defend itself.”
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  21. There seems to be a great deal of information in the book “British immigration policy since 1939″ on this subject, which confirms the ‘Windrush generation’ far from being invited by the government, were an unwanted, and largely unproductive rabble.

    This was not a book written from an anti-immigrant standpoint. Indeed, in the pre-amble it declares the the ambitions of the newly present aliens ‘exceeded’ those of the settled native British population. It serves more to document the anti-migrant views of the British government, based largely on documents released in the early 1990s pertaining to discussions surrounding the 1962 immigration act, and illustrates that government were in agreement with the public. That coloured immigration was, indeed, a disaster for Britain and the British people. It was only sheer cowardice that prevented them from reversing the inflow.

    To summarize
    1) They were never invited to rebuild anything. The first ship was meant to pick up British Troops from the West Indies, and was not sent to retrieve workers.

    2) As has been mentioned, the numbers were initially so small, they formed an insignificant share of the workforce. Almost all worked in bottom end jobs like streetsweeping or as porters or bus conductors. If they got ill or had children, the cost of supporting them & their dependents soon exceeded the tiny economic surplus they delivered. The rest of the population working a few minutes overtime every week would have easily performed the scant work they carried out. They were being introduced into a country with a severe housing shortage and rationing still in place.

    3)By 1956, a small recession had arrived, and full employment was never again seen. Yet, until 1955, the inflow was small. It was only after 1955 numbers of coloured immigrants had begun to rise. And by that time, there were few jobs for them to take. Already the problem of the urban, jobless non-white immigrant was beginning to manifest. Workers exceeded jobs and employers had the luxury of putting ‘no coloureds need apply’ into adverts.

    4)Legislation to prevent the inflow of coloured immigrants was always desired by ministers, but put off because i)British multinationals had business interests in the Subcontinent that would be at risk if the government was seen to be prejudiced against coloured immigrants and ii) the west indies were still part of the empire, and, foolishly, many wanted it to remain so, so allowed continued settlement of afro-carribeans into the UK. (Sounds familiar to politicians selling out to big business today)

    5) When South Asians began to come in bigger numbers than west indians, the problems with integration were already well known. It was well documented that unlike those from the Carribbean, the Asians did not follow christianity, rarely spoke any English, and more often than not, where in very poor physical health, often carrying contagious diseases (see the Bradford and S.Wales Smallpox outbreak of 1962. An event that claimed the lives of 21 Britons, and for which over 1 million had to be vaccinated for. Brought into the country by 2 Pakistanis. As a final insult, the Pakistanis who brought in the disease, survived) In addition, it was noted even when given the chance, they did not want to live among the British and did not want to adopt British traditions and culture.

    6) When, after 1962, the government finally did legislate to close down open borders and allow commonwealth immigrants in only if they had employment vouchers, the degree to which they actually had desired skills was laid bare. In 1961, before vouchers were introduced, 136,400 coloured immigrants entered. 19181 of those were men from Jamaica. In 1963, when proof of employment had to be produced, that fell by 95% to 984. By 1972, just 64 Jamaican men were able to find offers of work. In essence, the vast majority of Jamaican’s had been coming to the UK with no job offer. They were asked to come by no one. They were simply not prevented from coming.

    Its disheartening to see many of my own anti-immigration peers buy the media revisionist propaganda on this…that the Windrush generation are some kind of national treasure…its just the current inflow who are changing the nation. Ignoring of course, most terrorists are home grown, many tracing their families presence back to the 1960s. Or the continued destruction of our inner cities by West Indian youths and their drug dealing and knife and gun crime.

    Read More
    • Replies: @jilles dykstra
    In 1953, when the British empire was almost gone, British politicians somehow tried to keep London as capital of what no longer was.
    They declared anyone in the former colonies or dominions a British citizen.
    When, just a few weeks later, a ship arrived from the Caribbean with some 300 British citizens, coloured, they were startled and flabbergasted.
    Very few ordinary white British saw these people as British.
    After the Grenfell tower fire with some 80 casualties May did not consider it necessaryto go there, most of them were coloured.
    Meetings of British parliament are broadcast these days, take a look how many 'foreigners' are among them.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  22. To see the reason for the state of society and the ones behind it, read THE PROTOCOLS OF ZION, the state of the world affairs is not by accident.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  23. Z-man says:

    Britain is not a Utopia but a Pseudotopia — a Land of Lies. The biggest and foulest lies swirl in the vast sewer of what the left would call “racial discourse.” Here are a few of those lies:
    There is only one race — the human race.
    All races are equal in intellectual, moral and civilizational potential.
    Mass immigration from the Third World enriches the stale pale nations of the First World.
    Any White resistance to ethnic enrichment must be crushed before it leads to a Second Holocaust.
    When non-Whites fail, it can only be because of White racism.
    These lies are reinforced constantly by every medium of official propaganda and public education.

    Bears repearing.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  24. TG says:

    “How shall the state be most vigorous? It shall be most vigorous when it is without conflict. How shall it be without conflict? When it is without disagreement. How shall disagreement be banished? By banishing the four causes of disagreement: lies, foolish talk, boastful talk, and talk which serves only to incite quarrels. How shall the four causes be banished? By speaking only Correct Thought. Then shall the state be without disagreement. Being without disagreement it shall be without conflict. Being without conflict it shall be vigorous, strong, and secure.” Ascian Lexicon, from Gene Wolfe’s “Urth of the New Sun” series.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  25. nsa says:
    @Curtis Mouser I
    Yet dumb White sportscuck men still pay Sky to brainwash them.

    The flat screen joo box in every American living room relentlessly pushes negro worship and homo worship. Sometimes the vile jooies jokingly combine both of these perverted idolatries into one homoerotic entertainment…….for example, “football”. Giant muscle canary negroids in plastic hats and tight pants chase and grope each other and perform jungle dances, while tens of thousands of obese homocucked whites scream girlie style in orgasmic ecstacy. The yids are laughing their asses off as they get even richer off their kept masses of goy boy asses…..

    Read More
    • LOL: Seamus Padraig
    • Replies: @renfro
    While sofa bound not too long ago from a torn muscle I noticed that every single family commercial on TV showed either a black wife and white husband or white wife and black husband.
    This is programing the younger generation.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  26. Highly amusing rant. Interesting, though is what the author doesn’t say and that story starts with Margaret Thatcher. She and Viktor Orban have something in common: neither one has ever called for their country to leave the EU (Brexit is the brainchild of Thatcher’s mediocre successors). The author also doesn’t call for any Member State to leave the EU (not even the UK) nor, indeed, does he utter the slightest criticism of the EU. In other words the refugee scam has failed to break up the EU. The effect of discrediting Merkel was to undermine the refugee scam, yet another example of the way in which the various American anti-EU scams cut across and neutralise each other.

    Read More
    • Replies: @jilles dykstra
    The Brexit referendum was the idea of Cameron, to stop discussion in GB about the EU.
    It backfired.
    Other governments learned the lesson, in France Ségolène Royal stated 'we will never ask the French people if they want to stay in the EU'.
    With us in the Netherlands referenda are not longer possible, the referendum law was abolished.
    Any time the law was used, the government measure was outvoted.
    But nothing happened, the law just foresaw advice.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  27. anon[241] • Disclaimer says:
    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  28. Randal says:

    The above shows the dishonesty of the leftist “hegemonic discourse” of the “land of lies”. The ironically pretty leftist himself Craig Murray today also highlighted the dishonesty of the government itself and the collaborative establishment media in the land of lies:

    Where They Tell You Not to Look

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  29. Garbage says:

    What a nasty, fully racist pack of lies.

    Unz.com runs some interesting writers at times. But when nasty, racist piece of animal droppings like this are promoted to the number one story at the top of the front page, my instinct is to run and find the few authors I do like on other sites.

    Just one example … the assertion that everyone who came in the Windrush migration was of ‘low IQ’. No supporting facts given. No results of IQ tests given. And even then I’d mistrust averages and would want to see the highs and low of the tests before I believed the assumption that ‘everyone’ was of low IQ. Just the assumption that because they were not ‘white’ they must have a low IQ.

    Its this author obviously has a low IQ and lacks the ability for anysort of logical reasoning.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Randal

    nasty, fully racist pack of lies ...... nasty, racist piece of animal droppings
     
    Your use of the term "racist" as a term of abuse shows that you very much represent part of the problem the author is describing.

    The term is of course almost impossible to use as anything other than a term of smearing abuse, as you use it, but if it has any meaning then it is either recognising the reality of racial differences, or hating people of other races merely because they are of other races. In the former case, it is merely basic truth, however unwelcome that might be for you, and in the latter there is no evidence for it whatsoever in the piece above. Disapproval, let alone recognition of evident difference, is not hatred.

    Just one example … the assertion that everyone who came in the Windrush migration was of ‘low IQ’. No supporting facts given. No results of IQ tests given. And even then I’d mistrust averages and would want to see the highs and low of the tests before I believed the assumption that ‘everyone’ was of low IQ. Just the assumption that because they were not ‘white’ they must have a low IQ.

    Its this author obviously has a low IQ and lacks the ability for anysort of logical reasoning.
     
    I understand that you are upset by having encountered some shocking transgressions against your secular idol of anti-racism, but if you are going to sling around abuse such as you do here, you probably ought to ensure your own house is not built of glass.

    Far from what you claim he wrote, the author in fact wrote that:

    the non-Whites of the “Windrush Generation” were of low average IQ and came from clannish, corrupt cultures with no history of economic success or intellectual achievement
     
    [Emphasis added]

    These assertions are, respectively, a perfectly reasonable extrapolation from known facts (blacks, including West Indian blacks, do have significantly lower IQs on average, though it's possible if pretty unlikely that the emigrants were a self-selecting subset with sufficiently higher IQs to overcome this) and an evident truth (West Indian society was and is clannish and corrupt by comparison with early C20th British culture). If you are ignorant of the gap between average black IQs and average white IQs, just look around this site for a while, where it is much discussed with reference to the clear scientific evidence establishing it. To the extent there is a legitimate debate about it, it is over whether the difference, which incontrovertibly exists, is meaningful (ie whether and to what extent IQ is meaningful as a measure of intelligence) and whether and to what relative degree it is caused by nature or by nurture.

    I'm sure you'd very, very much prefer the truth were more in conformity with your own dogma, but that's not how the world works, in general. Your choice, having encountered uncomfortable reality, is whether to retreat back into your closed, dogmatic, wrong but comfortable shell, or to face up to it and address its consequences.
    , @Them Guys
    Perhaps You need a, Deeeetroit Edjewkation on Ebonics eh?

    Today's 12th.-Grade Ebonics speech lesson...

    "Question: What has Four Leg's, Run's wildly and quickly down a hallway in a typical office Building, while Yelling...HODEDO! HODEDO!!"?



    Answer: "Tyronius & his Bro Ebolaniquweous, Running and Yelling Hodedo Hodedo to folks on the elevator Axin dem folk to...Hold The Door!.....Hold the Door! so both Apeisis amongusiz can enter elevator before it leaves for another floor, elsewize both subhuman apes would need await the next elevator.

    Stay Tuned for Tommorows newest Colored folk Math excersize in which we shall learn math based upon Dope deals!

    Such as last weeks Math lesson which was based on...

    "Question: If Ebolaniquweous Jones has 100-oz's of Cwack Kocaine, and trades 1/4 of his stash for Six Ho's and a New Sat. Nite Special.....How much Cwack Dope will he have left to trade for .38 Spec. Ammo to go with his new Sat Nite special he can then use to, whack his Ho-Momma an git dat big life insurance policy proceeds she named him on az beneficiary?...NOTE: Answer Must be given in Grams left of the orig 3/4ths of his remaining stash.

    Next: Xsplainz to dem six Ho's how many tricks dey mus turnz ebery day to keeps Dey Pimp man Ebolaniquweous wit enough income to afford monthly payment's on him's shinny new Caddy.

    Final Math Test Question: "How Much new Cwack Dope will He need ta score and sell off to afford chrome twin side exhaust pipes comming out da side of his Caddy's front fenders? And how much cash needed to buy Faux fake Lepored Fur Dash Board and Seat coverings in dat new Caddy ridez?"

    Note #2: Don't worry if Unable to answer properly as Afirmative Action and fully Corrupted Deeeetroit Colored Runz Edjewmacation scoolz will pazz youz Monkey Azzes anywayz!

    Teacher Quetsun from a Gifted Classmate, ShakinaMaquinna Manikua Puqueekweeiz..."Teacher Lemme AX Yo a Quetsun....Wuz beez da diff ifin Dat huge Qwack Dope pile was firz done wit some dat Cut stuff kinz be used to make dat dope pile bigga yet?"
    , @James Forrestal
    Why do you hate White people so much? Let go of your mindless hatred. Try to be more tolerant. Please.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  30. renfro says:
    @Carlos32
    Having a debate about the logic of immigration policy is pointless and rather outdated by more than a decade.

    The bottom line is the western elites have rather obviously been using immigration to eliminate national identity. Among other things pushing the whole minorities agenda to divide society into small controllable groups.

    Rights like freedom of speech have been suppressed and will continue to do so to achieve this goal

    Any debate that ignores this obvious fact is borring and pointless. You might as well be talking to your hand.

    The bottom line is the western elites have rather obviously been using immigration to eliminate national identity. Among other things pushing the whole minorities agenda to divide society into small controllable groups.

    ”…to eliminate national identity”…..is ((their)) agenda.

    Add to that the constant drum beat of the evil white man responsible for all the world’s evils.

    French writer Jean Francois Revel wrote,……. “Clearly, a civilization that feels guilty for everything it is and does will lack the energy and conviction to defend itself.”

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  31. renfro says:
    @nsa
    The flat screen joo box in every American living room relentlessly pushes negro worship and homo worship. Sometimes the vile jooies jokingly combine both of these perverted idolatries into one homoerotic entertainment.......for example, "football". Giant muscle canary negroids in plastic hats and tight pants chase and grope each other and perform jungle dances, while tens of thousands of obese homocucked whites scream girlie style in orgasmic ecstacy. The yids are laughing their asses off as they get even richer off their kept masses of goy boy asses.....

    While sofa bound not too long ago from a torn muscle I noticed that every single family commercial on TV showed either a black wife and white husband or white wife and black husband.
    This is programing the younger generation.

    Read More
    • Replies: @jilles dykstra
    Indeed, but here not just commercials, every detective story too, with often coloured women in leading positions.
    Reality here, quite different, as far as I can see.
    There it is striking how few with immigation background hold responsible jobs.
    , @Georgiaboy61
    Research the life and ideology of Count Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi, the biracial (Austrian-Japanese) founder of the United Europe movement which led directly to the European Union of today - and had a disproportionate influence upon globalism as a movement.

    Kalergi - who claimed to have opposed Hitler and National Socialism - was a eugenicist who believed that the ideal European of the future would be a hybrid of white native Europeans and darker-skinned peoples from the Third World - and supported social engineering policies to that end, which is exactly what the EU is undertaking today.

    The Nazis claimed that Aryans were a superior race, whereas the Imperial Japanese claimed also to be racially-superior not only to their East Asian cousins, but the barbarians in America in Europe. And so on and so forth. Now, it is the globalists claiming to be the master race, and that everyone else is their inferior. The same old totalitarian wine in new bottles, one might say.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  32. You were for Corbyn before you were against him: http://www.unz.com/article/semites-self-pity-aggressiveness-and-censorship/

    You were for Muslims before you were against them: http://www.unz.com/article/wicked-muslims-innocent-jews/

    You’re a fan of Orban but that can’t be the same Orban who’s a friend of Netanyahu, can it?

    Perhaps you’re a member of the BNP which is now supporting a candidate for PM who will bring in more foreigners than ever.

    You complain about Britain’s media but use the same term ‘Asians’ they do (Japanese? Koreans? Filipinos?)

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  33. @renfro
    While sofa bound not too long ago from a torn muscle I noticed that every single family commercial on TV showed either a black wife and white husband or white wife and black husband.
    This is programing the younger generation.

    Indeed, but here not just commercials, every detective story too, with often coloured women in leading positions.
    Reality here, quite different, as far as I can see.
    There it is striking how few with immigation background hold responsible jobs.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  34. Randal says:
    @Garbage
    What a nasty, fully racist pack of lies.

    Unz.com runs some interesting writers at times. But when nasty, racist piece of animal droppings like this are promoted to the number one story at the top of the front page, my instinct is to run and find the few authors I do like on other sites.

    Just one example ... the assertion that everyone who came in the Windrush migration was of 'low IQ'. No supporting facts given. No results of IQ tests given. And even then I'd mistrust averages and would want to see the highs and low of the tests before I believed the assumption that 'everyone' was of low IQ. Just the assumption that because they were not 'white' they must have a low IQ.

    Its this author obviously has a low IQ and lacks the ability for anysort of logical reasoning.

    nasty, fully racist pack of lies …… nasty, racist piece of animal droppings

    Your use of the term “racist” as a term of abuse shows that you very much represent part of the problem the author is describing.

    The term is of course almost impossible to use as anything other than a term of smearing abuse, as you use it, but if it has any meaning then it is either recognising the reality of racial differences, or hating people of other races merely because they are of other races. In the former case, it is merely basic truth, however unwelcome that might be for you, and in the latter there is no evidence for it whatsoever in the piece above. Disapproval, let alone recognition of evident difference, is not hatred.

    Just one example … the assertion that everyone who came in the Windrush migration was of ‘low IQ’. No supporting facts given. No results of IQ tests given. And even then I’d mistrust averages and would want to see the highs and low of the tests before I believed the assumption that ‘everyone’ was of low IQ. Just the assumption that because they were not ‘white’ they must have a low IQ.

    Its this author obviously has a low IQ and lacks the ability for anysort of logical reasoning.

    I understand that you are upset by having encountered some shocking transgressions against your secular idol of anti-racism, but if you are going to sling around abuse such as you do here, you probably ought to ensure your own house is not built of glass.

    Far from what you claim he wrote, the author in fact wrote that:

    the non-Whites of the “Windrush Generation” were of low average IQ and came from clannish, corrupt cultures with no history of economic success or intellectual achievement

    [Emphasis added]

    These assertions are, respectively, a perfectly reasonable extrapolation from known facts (blacks, including West Indian blacks, do have significantly lower IQs on average, though it’s possible if pretty unlikely that the emigrants were a self-selecting subset with sufficiently higher IQs to overcome this) and an evident truth (West Indian society was and is clannish and corrupt by comparison with early C20th British culture). If you are ignorant of the gap between average black IQs and average white IQs, just look around this site for a while, where it is much discussed with reference to the clear scientific evidence establishing it. To the extent there is a legitimate debate about it, it is over whether the difference, which incontrovertibly exists, is meaningful (ie whether and to what extent IQ is meaningful as a measure of intelligence) and whether and to what relative degree it is caused by nature or by nurture.

    I’m sure you’d very, very much prefer the truth were more in conformity with your own dogma, but that’s not how the world works, in general. Your choice, having encountered uncomfortable reality, is whether to retreat back into your closed, dogmatic, wrong but comfortable shell, or to face up to it and address its consequences.

    Read More
    • Agree: Stan d Mute
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  35. @Roger Cliftonville Acton
    There seems to be a great deal of information in the book "British immigration policy since 1939" on this subject, which confirms the 'Windrush generation' far from being invited by the government, were an unwanted, and largely unproductive rabble.

    This was not a book written from an anti-immigrant standpoint. Indeed, in the pre-amble it declares the the ambitions of the newly present aliens 'exceeded' those of the settled native British population. It serves more to document the anti-migrant views of the British government, based largely on documents released in the early 1990s pertaining to discussions surrounding the 1962 immigration act, and illustrates that government were in agreement with the public. That coloured immigration was, indeed, a disaster for Britain and the British people. It was only sheer cowardice that prevented them from reversing the inflow.

    To summarize
    1) They were never invited to rebuild anything. The first ship was meant to pick up British Troops from the West Indies, and was not sent to retrieve workers.

    2) As has been mentioned, the numbers were initially so small, they formed an insignificant share of the workforce. Almost all worked in bottom end jobs like streetsweeping or as porters or bus conductors. If they got ill or had children, the cost of supporting them & their dependents soon exceeded the tiny economic surplus they delivered. The rest of the population working a few minutes overtime every week would have easily performed the scant work they carried out. They were being introduced into a country with a severe housing shortage and rationing still in place.

    3)By 1956, a small recession had arrived, and full employment was never again seen. Yet, until 1955, the inflow was small. It was only after 1955 numbers of coloured immigrants had begun to rise. And by that time, there were few jobs for them to take. Already the problem of the urban, jobless non-white immigrant was beginning to manifest. Workers exceeded jobs and employers had the luxury of putting 'no coloureds need apply' into adverts.

    4)Legislation to prevent the inflow of coloured immigrants was always desired by ministers, but put off because i)British multinationals had business interests in the Subcontinent that would be at risk if the government was seen to be prejudiced against coloured immigrants and ii) the west indies were still part of the empire, and, foolishly, many wanted it to remain so, so allowed continued settlement of afro-carribeans into the UK. (Sounds familiar to politicians selling out to big business today)

    5) When South Asians began to come in bigger numbers than west indians, the problems with integration were already well known. It was well documented that unlike those from the Carribbean, the Asians did not follow christianity, rarely spoke any English, and more often than not, where in very poor physical health, often carrying contagious diseases (see the Bradford and S.Wales Smallpox outbreak of 1962. An event that claimed the lives of 21 Britons, and for which over 1 million had to be vaccinated for. Brought into the country by 2 Pakistanis. As a final insult, the Pakistanis who brought in the disease, survived) In addition, it was noted even when given the chance, they did not want to live among the British and did not want to adopt British traditions and culture.

    6) When, after 1962, the government finally did legislate to close down open borders and allow commonwealth immigrants in only if they had employment vouchers, the degree to which they actually had desired skills was laid bare. In 1961, before vouchers were introduced, 136,400 coloured immigrants entered. 19181 of those were men from Jamaica. In 1963, when proof of employment had to be produced, that fell by 95% to 984. By 1972, just 64 Jamaican men were able to find offers of work. In essence, the vast majority of Jamaican's had been coming to the UK with no job offer. They were asked to come by no one. They were simply not prevented from coming.


    Its disheartening to see many of my own anti-immigration peers buy the media revisionist propaganda on this...that the Windrush generation are some kind of national treasure...its just the current inflow who are changing the nation. Ignoring of course, most terrorists are home grown, many tracing their families presence back to the 1960s. Or the continued destruction of our inner cities by West Indian youths and their drug dealing and knife and gun crime.

    In 1953, when the British empire was almost gone, British politicians somehow tried to keep London as capital of what no longer was.
    They declared anyone in the former colonies or dominions a British citizen.
    When, just a few weeks later, a ship arrived from the Caribbean with some 300 British citizens, coloured, they were startled and flabbergasted.
    Very few ordinary white British saw these people as British.
    After the Grenfell tower fire with some 80 casualties May did not consider it necessaryto go there, most of them were coloured.
    Meetings of British parliament are broadcast these days, take a look how many ‘foreigners’ are among them.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  36. @Michael Kenny
    Highly amusing rant. Interesting, though is what the author doesn’t say and that story starts with Margaret Thatcher. She and Viktor Orban have something in common: neither one has ever called for their country to leave the EU (Brexit is the brainchild of Thatcher’s mediocre successors). The author also doesn’t call for any Member State to leave the EU (not even the UK) nor, indeed, does he utter the slightest criticism of the EU. In other words the refugee scam has failed to break up the EU. The effect of discrediting Merkel was to undermine the refugee scam, yet another example of the way in which the various American anti-EU scams cut across and neutralise each other.

    The Brexit referendum was the idea of Cameron, to stop discussion in GB about the EU.
    It backfired.
    Other governments learned the lesson, in France Ségolène Royal stated ‘we will never ask the French people if they want to stay in the EU’.
    With us in the Netherlands referenda are not longer possible, the referendum law was abolished.
    Any time the law was used, the government measure was outvoted.
    But nothing happened, the law just foresaw advice.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Roger Cliftonville Acton
    Camerons downfall was his arrogance. As an old Etonian, he does not know failure. He has probably never been allowed to fail. If failure was on the cards, invisible forces would prevent that from happening.

    He got cocky after winning the Scottish referendum, and then the AV referendum. He thought he could make it a hat-trick, especially, i suspect after achieving an outright majority in the 2015 election.

    I actually think he might have pulled it off had he managed to hold it before Merkels decision to invite the world in such a chaotic, unplanned manner.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  37. Wally says:

    [Off-topic and extremely repetitive comments are much less likely to be published.]

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  38. Tyrion 2 says:
    @Randal
    If we lived in a free country, a piece like this could and would be published in one of the mainstream conservative outlets. We do not, and it could not.

    Nothing like this piece has ever been published in a mainstream media source of any type in the whole history of Britain, the country that invented the free press.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Randal
    And your point is?
    , @DFH
    Churchill's 'Zionism or Communism' was not too far from (in content, if not tone) some of the articles published on the Occidental Observer
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  39. Randal says:
    @Tyrion 2
    Nothing like this piece has ever been published in a mainstream media source of any type in the whole history of Britain, the country that invented the free press.

    And your point is?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Tyrion 2
    That your point was incorrect.
    , @Twodees Partain
    "And your point is?"

    There it is, right on top of his head.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  40. Them Guys says:
    @Garbage
    What a nasty, fully racist pack of lies.

    Unz.com runs some interesting writers at times. But when nasty, racist piece of animal droppings like this are promoted to the number one story at the top of the front page, my instinct is to run and find the few authors I do like on other sites.

    Just one example ... the assertion that everyone who came in the Windrush migration was of 'low IQ'. No supporting facts given. No results of IQ tests given. And even then I'd mistrust averages and would want to see the highs and low of the tests before I believed the assumption that 'everyone' was of low IQ. Just the assumption that because they were not 'white' they must have a low IQ.

    Its this author obviously has a low IQ and lacks the ability for anysort of logical reasoning.

    Perhaps You need a, Deeeetroit Edjewkation on Ebonics eh?

    Today’s 12th.-Grade Ebonics speech lesson…

    “Question: What has Four Leg’s, Run’s wildly and quickly down a hallway in a typical office Building, while Yelling…HODEDO! HODEDO!!”?

    Answer: “Tyronius & his Bro Ebolaniquweous, Running and Yelling Hodedo Hodedo to folks on the elevator Axin dem folk to…Hold The Door!…..Hold the Door! so both Apeisis amongusiz can enter elevator before it leaves for another floor, elsewize both subhuman apes would need await the next elevator.

    Stay Tuned for Tommorows newest Colored folk Math excersize in which we shall learn math based upon Dope deals!

    Such as last weeks Math lesson which was based on…

    “Question: If Ebolaniquweous Jones has 100-oz’s of Cwack Kocaine, and trades 1/4 of his stash for Six Ho’s and a New Sat. Nite Special…..How much Cwack Dope will he have left to trade for .38 Spec. Ammo to go with his new Sat Nite special he can then use to, whack his Ho-Momma an git dat big life insurance policy proceeds she named him on az beneficiary?…NOTE: Answer Must be given in Grams left of the orig 3/4ths of his remaining stash.

    Next: Xsplainz to dem six Ho’s how many tricks dey mus turnz ebery day to keeps Dey Pimp man Ebolaniquweous wit enough income to afford monthly payment’s on him’s shinny new Caddy.

    Final Math Test Question: “How Much new Cwack Dope will He need ta score and sell off to afford chrome twin side exhaust pipes comming out da side of his Caddy’s front fenders? And how much cash needed to buy Faux fake Lepored Fur Dash Board and Seat coverings in dat new Caddy ridez?”

    Note #2: Don’t worry if Unable to answer properly as Afirmative Action and fully Corrupted Deeeetroit Colored Runz Edjewmacation scoolz will pazz youz Monkey Azzes anywayz!

    Teacher Quetsun from a Gifted Classmate, ShakinaMaquinna Manikua Puqueekweeiz…”Teacher Lemme AX Yo a Quetsun….Wuz beez da diff ifin Dat huge Qwack Dope pile was firz done wit some dat Cut stuff kinz be used to make dat dope pile bigga yet?”

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  41. Tyrion 2 says:
    @Randal
    And your point is?

    That your point was incorrect.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Randal

    That your point was incorrect.
     
    Then it would have been better just to say so, rather than framing your response as an objectively incorrect, by any reasonable interpretation of the terms you used, irrelevance that gave no clear indication of your meaning.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  42. annamaria says:

    Why have Syrians been on the run from their homes: “Syrian MP Fares Shehabi Pummels BBC Colonialist Sackur:” http://www.syrianews.cc/syrian-mp-fares-shehabi-pummels-bbc-colonialist-sackur/
    Why have low IQ sub-Saharan Africans been flocking to Libya: http://www.msnbc.com/specials/migrant-crisis/libya http://barenakedislam.com/2014/07/23/moammar-gaddafi-warned-europe-if-i-go-down-europe-goes-black/
    – First, it was the massive and systematic violation of international law by the US/NATO “deciders” guided by ziocons. Then the EU was subjected to “divide et impera” — deservedly — by the “innovative” immigration policies contradicting the European national security.
    It takes time, skills, and discipline to build the edifice of laws and to implement the codex of rules and regulations. It takes ignorance, stupidity, personal profiteering, and little time to destroy the complex edifice. See no-go zones.
    Either the newcomers adjust or they must be removed back to their native countries. The Pakistani and Jamaican gangs should be first in line for repatriation. ISIS jihadists (financed and trained by NATO/US/Saudi/Israel) should follow (preferably along with their criminal handlers).
    Currently, the EU/UK governments do not do their job of protecting their citizens from dangers posed by the new-comer criminals.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  43. renfro says:

    This is interesting. He’d do better if he toned it down a bit. Still, 18% in a state like Calif is worth mentioning.

    Top Republican In California Senate Race Called For Government ‘Free From Jews’

    April 29, 2018 By Aiden Pink

    Anti-Semite Patrick Little is running for Senate as a Republican in California.

    The top challenger to California Sen. Dianne Feinstein in her upcoming re-election campaign is a candidate who has repeatedly espoused anti-Semitism and has been endorsed by former Ku Klux Klan leader David Duke, a poll found last week.

    The survey, conducted by SurveyUSA, found Feinstein leading the field with 39%. In second place is Republican Patrick Little with 18%, with other candidates trailing at 8% or fewer.

    According to RightWingWatch, Little stated in a campaign video posted earlier this week that he “woke up to the Jewish question and dedicated my life to exposing these Jews that control our country.”

    He also has written on Gab, a Twitter-like platform popular with white nationalists, that he is in favor of “a government that makes counter-Semitism central to all aims of the state,” which would be “free from Jews.”

    Another Gab message called for a database of Jews because “when Israel is destroyed and the [Zionist Occupied Governments] of the west are overthrown, we’ll have to ensure that they aren’t hiding among us to subvert us again….There’s only 1 lawful punishment for high treason” — the death penalty.

    The top-two votegetters regardless of party in the June 5 primary will advance to the general election in November.

    Little would not be the first avowed anti-Semite to gain the Republican Party nomination — former American Nazi Party leader Arthur Jones won the GOP primary unopposed in a heavily Democratic congressional district in Illinois.

    And after House Speaker Paul Ryan announced earlier this month that he would not seek another term in office, the remaining Republican candidate with the most campaign funds and name recognition was Paul Nehlen, who was banned from Twitter for a series of anti-Semitic and racist messages

    Read more: undefined/fast-forward/399969/top-republican-in-california-senate-race-called-for-government-free-from/

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  44. Josecanuc says:

    First I applaud you for another magnificent illustration of tour de force writing. I wish I could write half, a third as well as you do.

    ‘I believe their object to be as impure as the means by which their power has been acquired, and denounce them..” Whig MP Thomas Duncombe, February 1828

    Arnold White, British writer in his book The Modern Jew, 1898 concluded (in 1898) that the Jews were making “monotonous progress toward the mastery of the world.” (In Isadore Singer, Russia at the Bar of the American People: A Memorial of Kishinef , New York, 1904)

    Condorcet, an 18th century French mathematician-philosopher theorized that if a highly organized, highly motivated, essentially amoral, highly tenacious minority all worked together towards a single mission or goal akin to the style a great football team does to achieve a goal do – they could – if they kept their dementia hidden and pretended to me ordinary human beings (‘you can’t fight what you can’t see, what is deliberately kept hidden” – and ‘people are caught hoodwinked by appearance – and appearance is all there is in the world”) – even if they did not own or control the so called democracy’s mass media, their banks and their academia – could – because of the incredulity and naive sophomoric mind of the average citizen who thinks there are highly educated very smart people who are paid to act as a ‘firewall’ to protect them from anything nefarious happening to their nation or to prevent them from being enslaved by a few i.e., university professors, M16, politicians, preachers, – you know who I am referring – all the
    charlatan plastic puppet professors and politicians – the highly motivated righteous could – through perseverance (“Great works are performed realized not by strength, but by perseverance.” Samuel Johnson) – could achieve total control over the democratic nation simply because of the low grade affected character of the charlatan politicians – as most of the con artist politicians in the Capitalistic Christian West must be because as Plato said: “‘dishonesty is more profitable than honesty.”

    When the goal that this highly motivated minority strives to achieve relates to a sacrosanct unbreakable indestructible covenant (bond) with some ancient war God named YHWH that concerns the most significant pivotal momentous profound consequential commitment responsibility (or burden and yoke) in the entire Universe i.e., to be mankind’s blessing and light, to uplift humanity and to heal and cure and inherit (acquire) the earth – the ‘End’ the fulfillment of the covenant – must always absolve the means utilized to fulfill it – whether it is subjugating Christian nations such as England and via the highly amoral minority’s control of the mass media and their control of their low grade politicians then compelling them to
    subjugate Iraq and now destroy Syria and at the same time organize and compel them to subjugated the remainder of the world i.e., Iran, Russia, China, etc.

    I think this is what H G Wells meant when he wrote: “It is not much good thinking of a thing unless you think it out.” Wells also thought that ‘There is room for some very serious research into the question why antisemitism emerges in every country the Jews reside in.’

    “One thing I have come to know thoroughly: the abysmal lack of character in man.” Kierkegaard

    Read More
    • Replies: @lavoisier
    Insightful.

    I have always believed that the only way a small minority of Jewish individuals could hijack Western nations to serve theirnefarious ends required an ample supply of brain dead and venal Goyim.

    Without such treacherous accomplices, Jewish manipulation would have gone nowhere.

    Too many of the Goyim have been willing accomplices to the destruction of their civilization.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  45. renfro says:

    Well the republicans just screwed themselves with this.

    House Catholic chaplain forced out by Ryan

    By Melanie Zanona and Mike Lillis – 04/26/18 02:16 PM EDT 2,913comments

    House Chaplain Patrick Conroy’s sudden resignation has sparked a furor on Capitol Hill, with sources in both parties saying he was pushed out by Speaker Paul Ryan

    Conroy’s own resignation announcement stated that it was done at Ryan’s request.

    “As you have requested, I hereby offer my resignation as the 60th Chaplain of the United States House of Representatives,” the April 15 letter to Ryan, obtained by The Hill, states.
    Through his office, Conroy, who has served as chaplain since 2011, declined to comment on Thursday. His resignation is effective May 24.

    Four different sources — two from each party — say Conroy was told that he must retire or that he would be dismissed.

    The message from Ryan was delivered by his chief of staff, Jonathan Burks.

    The issue has riled House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi

    (D-Calif.), who broached the episode during the Democrats’ whip meeting in the Capitol Thursday morning.

    A bipartisan group of lawmakers are planning to send a letter to Ryan requesting additional information regarding Conroy’s dismissal; the group is currently circulating the letter among colleagues to collect more signatures.

    It’s unclear exactly what if any political dispute, however, led to the chaplain’s dismissal.

    A Democratic lawmaker said that the Speaker took issue with a prayer on the House floor that could have been perceived as being critical of the GOP tax-cut bill.

    On Nov. 6 — the first day of the markup on the GOP’s tax bill — Conroy in a prayer urged lawmakers to ensure the legislation did not exacerbate the nation’s gaping class disparities.

    “May all Members be mindful that the institutions and structures of our great Nation guarantee the opportunities that have allowed some to achieve great success, while others continue to struggle,” Conroy said at the time. “May their efforts these days guarantee that there are not winners and losers under new tax laws, but benefits balanced and shared by all Americans.”

    A senior GOP aide said Conroy’s exit “was not because of any particular prayer.”

    “Leader Pelosi was given advance notice by Speaker Ryan,” said a Pelosi spokesman, but she “also made it clear to Speaker Ryan that she disagreed with this decision.”

    A second Democratic aide said Conroy’s ouster was “largely driven by a speech on the tax bill that the Speaker didn’t like.” But the source also offered a second reason.

    “Some of the more conservative evangelical Republicans didn’t like that the Father had invited a Muslim person to give the opening prayer,” the source said.

    When Pelosi, who is Catholic, informed members of her whip team on Thursday morning that Conroy was pushed out against his will, it “shocked” the members, according to one lawmaker.

    Catholic members on both sides of the aisle were furious to learn that Conroy’s retirement was not voluntary, according to multiple sources, including one Republican lawmaker and one Democratic member.”

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  46. renfro says:

    Also interesting.

    U.S. Army Investigating Why Base Chaplains Fired Jewish Leaders

    April 29, 2018 By Aiden Pink

    U.S. Army soldiers sing the Army song during a welcome home ceremony at Fort Campbell, Ky..

    Leaders at an United States Army base in Kentucky are investigating why chaplains fired the longstanding Jewish lay leaders there, Army Times reported Saturday.

    Jeanette Mize and her husband Curt have led the Jewish community at Fort Campbell as volunteers since 1999. They were allegedly fired without cause under the orders of the top chaplains of the 101st Airborne Division, which is based there.

    “There was no explanation why I was fired,” Jeannette Mize told Army Times.

    Mize said that chaplains who delivered the news told her that they appreciated her contributions over the years, but admitted that they had never attended Jewish services despite her invitations. She added that one chaplain told her that it “would compromise his religion to attend.”

    The top chaplains at the base allegedly refused to allow a Seder on the first night of Passover, March 30, because it was also Good Friday.

    Mize is being represented by Mikey Weinstein of the Military Religious Freedom Foundation, who has spoken with the division’s chief of staff.

    “When you say that some of the most senior military chaplains can’t even observe Jewish faith practices because it would be offensive to their religious views, it doesn’t get much worse than that, except when you tell them that if they want the base chaplains to support Passover, they have to choose a day that isn’t Passover,” Weinstein said.

    Around 80 Jews live on the base, Mize said. She added that the nearest synagogue is in Nashville, more than an hour’s drive away.

    Fort Campbell’s director of public affairs, Robert Jenkins, told Army Times that the post is now investigating the affair.

    “Fort Campbell is committed to maintaining and improving the exceptional support we strive to offer all of our chapel communities,” Jenkins said. “We make every effort to ensure all soldiers, family members and civilians have the opportunity to exercise their religious rights. Further comment as this is examined is not appropriate.”

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  47. Randal says:
    @Tyrion 2
    That your point was incorrect.

    That your point was incorrect.

    Then it would have been better just to say so, rather than framing your response as an objectively incorrect, by any reasonable interpretation of the terms you used, irrelevance that gave no clear indication of your meaning.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Tyrion 2
    My response was true and contradicted your comment thereby rendering that obviously false.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  48. @Curtis Mouser I
    Yet dumb White sportscuck men still pay Sky to brainwash them.

    “sportscuck”

    Perfect term to describe the white male addiction to black-dominated corporate sports. I may borrow it occasionally.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  49. Tyrion 2 says:
    @Randal

    That your point was incorrect.
     
    Then it would have been better just to say so, rather than framing your response as an objectively incorrect, by any reasonable interpretation of the terms you used, irrelevance that gave no clear indication of your meaning.

    My response was true and contradicted your comment thereby rendering that obviously false.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Randal
    Well now that you've confirmed that it was intended as a contradiction, at least it's possible to twist it into something that might make sense as such.

    It appears you tried to argue something along the lines of: in your opinion nothing like the piece above has been published and therefore my original assertion is false. But your assertion is either outright false or irrelevant. If you intended to mean that nothing expressing similar views and facts to it has previously been published then you might be correct but since the circumstances that gave rise to its expression and that it describes are those pertaining now and not in the past, clearly the fact has no relevance to anything, let alone the point you seem to have thought you were refuting. If on the other hand you intended to argue that nothing similar in kind to it - offending against establishment dogmas at length and in controversial and sometimes polemic form, has ever been published, then you are simply incorrect. That kind of stuff was routinely published in the weightier leftwing publications of the past. That, of course, was when the left was exploiting the arguments for political freedom of speech to defend its own side's supposed right to offend and to shock, rather than, as the left does now, forgetting its past loyalty to that doctrine in order to suppress dissenting speech to its own now dominant dogmas as "hate speech" etc.

    And your argument fails as basic logic in any event, even if your above assertion were not either incorrect or irrelevant. Whether or not anything similar has ever been published in the past does not, as a matter of basic logic, have any decisive bearing on the question of whether or not it would be published today if we lived in a country in which the publishers and writers would not be harassed out of employment and quite possibly imprisoned for publishing it.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  50. @jilles dykstra
    The Brexit referendum was the idea of Cameron, to stop discussion in GB about the EU.
    It backfired.
    Other governments learned the lesson, in France Ségolène Royal stated 'we will never ask the French people if they want to stay in the EU'.
    With us in the Netherlands referenda are not longer possible, the referendum law was abolished.
    Any time the law was used, the government measure was outvoted.
    But nothing happened, the law just foresaw advice.

    Camerons downfall was his arrogance. As an old Etonian, he does not know failure. He has probably never been allowed to fail. If failure was on the cards, invisible forces would prevent that from happening.

    He got cocky after winning the Scottish referendum, and then the AV referendum. He thought he could make it a hat-trick, especially, i suspect after achieving an outright majority in the 2015 election.

    I actually think he might have pulled it off had he managed to hold it before Merkels decision to invite the world in such a chaotic, unplanned manner.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  51. Still cowering, hyperventilating and fear mongering over the .3% of potentially violent black citizens. It is tragic when anyone is randomly killed over something as trivial as tastes in music. I assume unlike the murder in Great Britain that someone is being held accountable.

    Though even according to this article things are not as clear you claim.

    https://heavy.com/news/2018/01/valaree-megan-schwab-stabbed-bullied-facebook-photos/

    It is doubtful that we want to go down a path of counting murders by skin color and then proceed to motive to get a wider picture of group is more likely to be killed by whom over skin color.

    The crime stats may include a spike, which is not the same thing as a trend. Attempting to link an increase in crime via of Black Lives Matter is going to a very tough slog (whatever my disagreements with them – they certainly have issues. Shilling for immigrants is but one.). I think this was attempted in detail by Mrs McDonald and in the end, her model fails on several levels overall crime stats contradict her premise. The Ferguson Effect is non-existent. The correlations you note don’t even correspond to the community activities in the area. Worse the samples are minuscule compared to the number if cities with similar population sizes and density. But if we are going to play the cause and effect correllation dance here are some other variations to consider.

    1. Economic trends, not just a spike

    http://www.newgeography.com/content/004808-divergent-demographic-and-economic-trends-chicago

    https://wp.nyu.edu/economicinequality/2017/03/29/economic-inequality-in-baltimore-md/

    https://thinkprogress.org/bankers-are-buying-baltimores-debt-charging-families-crazy-interest-rates-then-taking-their-homes-3c181335ae3c/

    https://www.huduser.gov/portal/publications/pdf/BaltimoreMD-comp-16.pdf

    wow prediction from 2001

    http://www.baltimorechronicle.com/ecotrends_dec02.html

    Now I am not a very smart guy. I have a low IQ and I am a lousy writer. But if I were going to consider impacts on crime behavior and police response or law enforcement in general, I hink that the economic picture has a far greater impact on said indices than one protest in either city, despite the minor riot —

    Ohh wait a minute, Baltimore and Chicago have historically high crime rates compared to most of the country — say it ain’t so.

    https://www.economist.com/news/united-states/21724399-america-gets-safer-marylands-biggest-city-does-not-crime-and-despair-baltimore

    Wait, crime trend in Chicago spikes up and down — before Ferguson or Trayvon Martin — this cannot be.

    https://www.economist.com/blogs/democracyinamerica/2014/05/crime-statistics-chicago

    Some other correllations:

    http://www.thecyberhood.net/documents/papers/TM.pdf

    http://chicagopolicyreview.org/2016/01/08/feel-it-in-the-air-pollution-and-crime-in-chicago/

    I think I will end with climate change causes crime.
    —————————————–

    I have no idea if what is going on in Great Britain is about ending democracy or stopping free speech. I have my view, but what I am certain about the sad commentary that passes as high IQ truth about color dynamics in this country. This sounds as hyperbolic as the sky is falling because Pres Trump was elected. And yet he has been the cheer leader for hyperbolic fear mongering on color issues. War on police — indeed.

    It’s tough enough making a conservative case without the fear mongering based on the few incidents used to make the case. The war is not against black citizens. They are not the ones eating away at the country’s soul. But you are welcome to point fingers in the wrong direction.

    Read More
    • Replies: @James Forrestal
    I congratulate you on your dogged attempt to obfuscate, confuse, and simply bore people into going along with establishment-promoted anti-White dogma, and to minimize the effects of the ongoing non-White invasion. A for effort -- F for content.

    Meanwhile, back in the real world, race correlates much more strongly with violent crime than any other demographic factor. By far.

    https://kek.gg/i/4fxGp5.jpg

    For a more specific illustration of this very basic, simple, well-known fact:

    https://kek.gg/i/39xF-h.jpg

    New York city keeps excellent statistics on crime by race (FBI stats intentionally conflate White and mestizo criminals, while tracking White and mestizo victims separately, making them trickier to interpret). What do they show?

    In 2014, 96% of all shootings in NYC were committed by Blacks and mestizos. Whites (32.8 percent of the population) committed 1.4% of shootings in 2014. Per capita, Negroes shot people at a rate 77x (not percent, times) that of Whites. Must be due to "stereotype threat," eh?

    https://kek.gg/i/7TQ6-T.jpg

    And as far as your ignorant, hate-filled Ferguson effect denialism -- murder up 20% over 2 years, with the biggest increases in exactly the areas where BLM terrorists were most active, and where the effect of depolicing was most obvious? Please. Even the commies at the Guardian had to concede that one:

    http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/may/13/ferguson-effect-real-researcher-richard-rosenfield-second-thoughts?CMP=share_btn_tw

    Diversity + proximity = conflict. A simple, basic truth that no amount of lies, ignorance, sophistry and anti-White hatred can ever obscure.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  52. Randal says:
    @Tyrion 2
    My response was true and contradicted your comment thereby rendering that obviously false.

    Well now that you’ve confirmed that it was intended as a contradiction, at least it’s possible to twist it into something that might make sense as such.

    It appears you tried to argue something along the lines of: in your opinion nothing like the piece above has been published and therefore my original assertion is false. But your assertion is either outright false or irrelevant. If you intended to mean that nothing expressing similar views and facts to it has previously been published then you might be correct but since the circumstances that gave rise to its expression and that it describes are those pertaining now and not in the past, clearly the fact has no relevance to anything, let alone the point you seem to have thought you were refuting. If on the other hand you intended to argue that nothing similar in kind to it – offending against establishment dogmas at length and in controversial and sometimes polemic form, has ever been published, then you are simply incorrect. That kind of stuff was routinely published in the weightier leftwing publications of the past. That, of course, was when the left was exploiting the arguments for political freedom of speech to defend its own side’s supposed right to offend and to shock, rather than, as the left does now, forgetting its past loyalty to that doctrine in order to suppress dissenting speech to its own now dominant dogmas as “hate speech” etc.

    And your argument fails as basic logic in any event, even if your above assertion were not either incorrect or irrelevant. Whether or not anything similar has ever been published in the past does not, as a matter of basic logic, have any decisive bearing on the question of whether or not it would be published today if we lived in a country in which the publishers and writers would not be harassed out of employment and quite possibly imprisoned for publishing it.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Tyrion 2
    Its vileness disqualifies it.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  53. republic says:
    @Randal
    If we lived in a free country, a piece like this could and would be published in one of the mainstream conservative outlets. We do not, and it could not.

    A serious question to Uk readers: would posting this on facebook in the UK be a crime today?

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wally
    "A serious question to UK readers: would posting this on facebook in the UK be a crime today?"

    Yes it would be.

    And the spineless sheep of the UK are doing nothing about it.
    , @Randal

    A serious question to Uk readers: would posting this on facebook in the UK be a crime today?
     
    Well one of the problems with speechcrime laws in general is that they are all necessarily very subjective, putting the individual at the mercy of the personal opinions and interpretations of policemen, prosecutors and judges, and ultimately of politicians (who do control the process in practice at the top level, for all the official claims of constitutional separation). I think it's obvious that large parts of this article could easily be interpreted by such people as "incitement to racial hatred", which is a crime. Beyond that, it's a matter of what practices and policies are followed in practice by the police, prosecutors and courts.

    These things are developing, because these laws were introduced fairly recently (over the past few decades) and clearly contradict the basic freedom of speech that Englishmen believe they have a right to, so those in power are cautious about enforcing them too far and too quickly for fear of a popular backlash. The process goes forward in conjunction with other social engineering to establish "racism" as a political and social taboo, and separate from the protections of freedom of speech in the minds of the general populace.

    One indicator of how far this process of social engineering has already gone was given in the recent Brexit campaign, when serious establishment figures reported a political party with substantial popular support to the police merely for a poster, and expected their referral to be taken seriously rather than openly laughed at and generally condemned as an outrage against political liberty:

    Nigel Farage's anti-migrant poster reported to police

    Facebook and other social media posts certainly have been the basis for supposedly "racist" speechcrime prosecutions, but mostly for relatively frivolous postings of songs, comedy etc so far, mostly driven by jewish and other identity lobby pressure. It is likely only a matter of time before the practice extends to articles like this one.

    In practice, the suppression of such pieces is achieved by political control of the journalist and editorial and ownership classes. No establishment publication would publish such a piece today because of its political content, If an owner of such a publication were to try to do so, he would face open and public rebellion by his editors and journalists who would probably have to be replaced, action by the NUJ (the journalists' union - openly in favour of suppression of dissent) against any journalists he brought in to replace the leftists he sacked, and a massive economic and political campaign to destroy the publication and the owner. If it became a high enough profile issue this would involve violent threats and mob attacks against the owner and publication, winked at by the police, and economic harassment - denial of bank accounts, premises etc: all these have been used against allegedly "racist" organisations and individuals in the past) Publication simply would not happen, though, because as far as the aforementioned classes are concerned there are certain opinions you just do not express. This is how British censorship has always worked, as Orwell famously noted.

    TL;DR: The piece is clearly illegal in England and Wales under the letter of the current law, using the likely interpretations that would be employed by establishment figures such as police, prosecutors and judges if they were politically free to do so. Whether it would in practice be actioned by the establishment depends upon the circumstances. Probably not yet, but quite possibly, if the senior politicians who would control the process were to decide they could get away with it.

    We are in a race between the increasing normalisation of speechcrime prosecutions in the countries of the US sphere (the intention is clearly to obtain a Supreme Court decision declaring "hate speech" outside the protection of the First Amendment as well, so the US itself will ultimately be brought into line on this, if the bipartisan establishment gets their way there, with a few more leftist SC appointments), and growing recognition of the problems caused by antiracism and mass immigration. There will be martyrs and conflict, for sure.

    , @Anne Lid
    I posted Derb's on mine, but this one I'm afraid to. The police have bigger fish to fry, on the other hand my black acquaintances are nice people, but objectivity is not necessarily one of their virtues. Besides, soon I will have to find a job.
    You know what, I will post it, and report back. It is not prudent, but inconsequential people can get away with it.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  54. @Randal
    And your point is?

    “And your point is?”

    There it is, right on top of his head.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  55. anon[219] • Disclaimer says:

    Stupid and racist article.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wally
    What's "stupid & racist" about it?

    Do tell.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  56. Wonder why they want to disarm you?

    They know the jig is up, the ponzi scheme fraud of an economic system we have is about to come crashing down.

    I guess they figure if there are enough immigrants in the country for the folk to direct their anger at, they will be spared. I think they might be wrong. The divide and conquer game isn’t as easy as it used to be.

    Someone remind me again why we need these politicians. What purpose they serve?

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  57. Wally says:
    @anon
    Stupid and racist article.

    What’s “stupid & racist” about it?

    Do tell.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  58. Wally says:
    @republic
    A serious question to Uk readers: would posting this on facebook in the UK be a crime today?

    “A serious question to UK readers: would posting this on facebook in the UK be a crime today?”

    Yes it would be.

    And the spineless sheep of the UK are doing nothing about it.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  59. lavoisier says: • Website
    @Miro23
    "As you make your bed so you must lie in it"

    Back in the day, the British could have resisted Cultural Marxism like the East Europeans are doing now, but while they were partying and opening the gates in the 1960's, the E. Europeans were getting first -hand experience of Totalitarian lying government and they remember how it worked.

    Back in the day, the British could have resisted Cultural Marxism like the East Europeans are doing now, but while they were partying and opening the gates in the 1960′s, the E. Europeans were getting first -hand experience of Totalitarian lying government and they remember how it worked.

    I think to blame the British people for the crisis they face is a little unfair.

    The people have been betrayed by their elites. This story provides evidence that it was the leaders of Britain who destroyed the country by opening up the floodgates to immigration while ignoring the wishes of the people they were supposed to represent.

    But lots of blame to go around for sure and a lot of the usual Jewish mischief.

    I still believe the only hope to turn this mess around is for the people who actually value their nation to get very angry at what has been done to them in the name of a utopian fiction.

    If you are not really angry you are not paying attention.

    Read More
    • Agree: Miro23, Randal
    • Replies: @Georgiaboy61
    While it is tempting to feel a sense of schadenfreude - that wonderful German word, which means to feel relief or pleasure at the misfortunate of another - over the predicament of Great Britain and a number of other nations in western-northern Europe, it is ultimately unfair to do so.

    This is so because they - the British people - like their peers across western and northern Europe, have been the targets of a decades-long psychological warfare operation waged against them by their own elites. Meaning the globalist oligarchs who now grasp the levers of power across so much of the western world.

    One of your very own, physician Anthony M. Daniels, a.k.a. Theodore Dalrymple - was among the first to recognize political correctness for what it was (and remains today),

    "Political correctness is communist propaganda writ small. In my study of communist societies, I came to the conclusion that the purpose of communist propaganda was not to persuade or convince, nor to inform, but to humiliate; and therefore, the less it corresponded to reality the better. When people are forced to remain silent when they are being told the most obvious lies, or even worse when they are forced to repeat the lies themselves, they lose once and for all their sense of probity. To assent to obvious lies is to co-operate with evil, and in some small way to become evil oneself. One’s standing to resist anything is thus eroded, and even destroyed. A society of emasculated liars is easy to control. I think if you examine political correctness, it has the same effect and is intended to."

    Far from being benign, P.C. - as it is abbreviated - is a potent form of psychological conditioning )brain-washing) as well as a highly-effective form of censorship.

    Political correctness is a form of Cultural Marxism, a century-old movement which applies classical economic Marxism to culture - and seeks thereby to attack and ultimately destroy the foundations of western civilization. The 100-year march through the institutions of western civilization was, by their lights, a success - because today Cultural Marxism is the most-dominant ideology in the West, especially within its elites and leadership class.

    Resistance must begin with an accurate appraisal of the enemy and his intentions. The western elites, being globalists who want one-world government, are using the soldiers of Allah - the Muslims - as the shock troops of their movement. Perhaps significant numbers of western elites have already, albeit in secret, converted to Islam. Angela Merkel is one possibility and there are certainly others.

    In other words, the common people - wherever in Europe they call home - must realize that they face not one but two enemies - the Muslims themselves, and their Quisling enablers and helpers within the West itself.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  60. @Janets
    Hear, hear, Mr Langdon, I applaud you. Thank you for speaking the truth so clearly and cogently. Alas, no-one in power will listen, you will be condemned and vilified as a hate-filled racist, and we ordinary English will continue to suffer.

    I am simultaneously enraged, shamed by and saddened at what has been done to my once-great country. I used to be proud to be English, now I'm proud only of our long and glorious history, not of what we are today. Brexit gave me hope for a short while, but that hope is long gone now.

    @ Janets

    I am an American, but one who has always considered himself something of an Anglophile.

    Winston Churchill is in my pantheon of personal heroes for his role in saving western civilization from the scourge of Nazism – but equally so for his prescient warnings concerning Islam, which he made over a century ago as a young man.

    Despite the nastiness of that family quarrel which began in 1776, our two nations have much in common. We Yanks ought to see what is happening in today’s Great Britain as a cautionary tale, since the globalist elites have the same in store for us as they have done to you. Why do you think their assault upon the First, Second and Fourth Amendments to the Bill of Rights have been so fierce?

    As for your nation, fight for her – if not for what she is now, then for what she once was – and perhaps may be again one day.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wally
    "the scourge of Nazism"

    Really? What "scourge"?

    Proof required.

    recommended:

    'Responsibility for WW2' https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=7544

    Who started bombing civilians first:Germany or Great Britain https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=8172

    Operation Barbarossa Was A Preventive Attack https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=7999

    www.codoh.com
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  61. @lavoisier

    Back in the day, the British could have resisted Cultural Marxism like the East Europeans are doing now, but while they were partying and opening the gates in the 1960′s, the E. Europeans were getting first -hand experience of Totalitarian lying government and they remember how it worked.
     
    I think to blame the British people for the crisis they face is a little unfair.

    The people have been betrayed by their elites. This story provides evidence that it was the leaders of Britain who destroyed the country by opening up the floodgates to immigration while ignoring the wishes of the people they were supposed to represent.

    But lots of blame to go around for sure and a lot of the usual Jewish mischief.

    I still believe the only hope to turn this mess around is for the people who actually value their nation to get very angry at what has been done to them in the name of a utopian fiction.

    If you are not really angry you are not paying attention.

    While it is tempting to feel a sense of schadenfreude – that wonderful German word, which means to feel relief or pleasure at the misfortunate of another – over the predicament of Great Britain and a number of other nations in western-northern Europe, it is ultimately unfair to do so.

    This is so because they – the British people – like their peers across western and northern Europe, have been the targets of a decades-long psychological warfare operation waged against them by their own elites. Meaning the globalist oligarchs who now grasp the levers of power across so much of the western world.

    One of your very own, physician Anthony M. Daniels, a.k.a. Theodore Dalrymple – was among the first to recognize political correctness for what it was (and remains today),

    “Political correctness is communist propaganda writ small. In my study of communist societies, I came to the conclusion that the purpose of communist propaganda was not to persuade or convince, nor to inform, but to humiliate; and therefore, the less it corresponded to reality the better. When people are forced to remain silent when they are being told the most obvious lies, or even worse when they are forced to repeat the lies themselves, they lose once and for all their sense of probity. To assent to obvious lies is to co-operate with evil, and in some small way to become evil oneself. One’s standing to resist anything is thus eroded, and even destroyed. A society of emasculated liars is easy to control. I think if you examine political correctness, it has the same effect and is intended to.”

    Far from being benign, P.C. – as it is abbreviated – is a potent form of psychological conditioning )brain-washing) as well as a highly-effective form of censorship.

    Political correctness is a form of Cultural Marxism, a century-old movement which applies classical economic Marxism to culture – and seeks thereby to attack and ultimately destroy the foundations of western civilization. The 100-year march through the institutions of western civilization was, by their lights, a success – because today Cultural Marxism is the most-dominant ideology in the West, especially within its elites and leadership class.

    Resistance must begin with an accurate appraisal of the enemy and his intentions. The western elites, being globalists who want one-world government, are using the soldiers of Allah – the Muslims – as the shock troops of their movement. Perhaps significant numbers of western elites have already, albeit in secret, converted to Islam. Angela Merkel is one possibility and there are certainly others.

    In other words, the common people – wherever in Europe they call home – must realize that they face not one but two enemies – the Muslims themselves, and their Quisling enablers and helpers within the West itself.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Anon
    Yes, yes, I nod my head approvingly. Well written too. And then..... is he a troll? Is he barking? Weatern elites secretly converted to Islam, including perhaps Angela Merkel!!! Don't leave us in suspense. Tell us it was just a naughty joke thrown in at the end to see how many maddies would bite.
    , @lavoisier
    Theodore Dalrymple is one of the writers I admire.

    I think it really boils down to cultural Marxism writ large. It infects the brain and forces people to lie about all sorts of things.

    This to me is the sickness, the power, the ability to destroy societies and civilization.

    I do not see Muslims as the bogeyman. They could easily be dealt with, and fairly too, if we did not have to deal with the madness of the white liberals infected with cultural Marxism who make excuses for the inexcusable.

    White liberals are the problem. Unless we can learn how to constrain their sickness Western Civilization is doomed.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  62. denk says:

    So this is why UK is head of the five lies ?

    Well you aint seen it yet ,

    This has barely scratched the surface,. !

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  63. @renfro
    While sofa bound not too long ago from a torn muscle I noticed that every single family commercial on TV showed either a black wife and white husband or white wife and black husband.
    This is programing the younger generation.

    Research the life and ideology of Count Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi, the biracial (Austrian-Japanese) founder of the United Europe movement which led directly to the European Union of today – and had a disproportionate influence upon globalism as a movement.

    Kalergi – who claimed to have opposed Hitler and National Socialism – was a eugenicist who believed that the ideal European of the future would be a hybrid of white native Europeans and darker-skinned peoples from the Third World – and supported social engineering policies to that end, which is exactly what the EU is undertaking today.

    The Nazis claimed that Aryans were a superior race, whereas the Imperial Japanese claimed also to be racially-superior not only to their East Asian cousins, but the barbarians in America in Europe. And so on and so forth. Now, it is the globalists claiming to be the master race, and that everyone else is their inferior. The same old totalitarian wine in new bottles, one might say.

    Read More
    • Agree: renfro
    • Replies: @Wally
    "The Nazis claimed that Aryans were a superior race"

    No they didn't. Simple as that.

    www.codoh.com
    , @Intelligent Dasein
    The Kalergi Plan? Seriously?!?

    Nobody has ever taken that shit seriously. It is one of history's many dead ends that, for some reason, certain oddballs feel compelled to keep talking about. Your mindless defamation of the Nazis indicates that you are far too thick to join the discussion here. This is not Breitbart, my friend.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  64. Wally says:
    @Georgiaboy61
    Research the life and ideology of Count Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi, the biracial (Austrian-Japanese) founder of the United Europe movement which led directly to the European Union of today - and had a disproportionate influence upon globalism as a movement.

    Kalergi - who claimed to have opposed Hitler and National Socialism - was a eugenicist who believed that the ideal European of the future would be a hybrid of white native Europeans and darker-skinned peoples from the Third World - and supported social engineering policies to that end, which is exactly what the EU is undertaking today.

    The Nazis claimed that Aryans were a superior race, whereas the Imperial Japanese claimed also to be racially-superior not only to their East Asian cousins, but the barbarians in America in Europe. And so on and so forth. Now, it is the globalists claiming to be the master race, and that everyone else is their inferior. The same old totalitarian wine in new bottles, one might say.

    “The Nazis claimed that Aryans were a superior race”

    No they didn’t. Simple as that.

    http://www.codoh.com

    Read More
    • Replies: @jilles dykstra
    Hitler did.
    But racial superiority ideas were nothing special at the time, the brother of the 1938 München Chamberlain wrote a book trying to show that European racial superiority explained the success of Europe in the world:
    Houston Stewart Chamberlain, ‘Die Grundlagen des Neunzehnten Jahrhunderts’, 1898- 1907, München
    A far better explanation one finds in
    Felipe Fernández-Armesto, ‘Civilisations’, London, 2000
    Population pressure, and the unique North Sea.
    , @Andrew E. Mathis
    Really? Seems pretty clearly stated:

    “Würde man die Menschheit in drei Arten einteilen: in Kulturbegründer, Kulturträger und Kulturzerstörer, dann käme als Vertreter der ersten wohl nur der Arier in Frage. Von ihm stammen die Fundamente und Mauern aller menschlichen Schöpfungen, und nur die äußere Form und Farbe sind bedingt durch die jeweiligen Charakterzüge der einzelnen Völker.”
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  65. Wally says:
    @Georgiaboy61
    @ Janets

    I am an American, but one who has always considered himself something of an Anglophile.

    Winston Churchill is in my pantheon of personal heroes for his role in saving western civilization from the scourge of Nazism - but equally so for his prescient warnings concerning Islam, which he made over a century ago as a young man.

    Despite the nastiness of that family quarrel which began in 1776, our two nations have much in common. We Yanks ought to see what is happening in today's Great Britain as a cautionary tale, since the globalist elites have the same in store for us as they have done to you. Why do you think their assault upon the First, Second and Fourth Amendments to the Bill of Rights have been so fierce?

    As for your nation, fight for her - if not for what she is now, then for what she once was - and perhaps may be again one day.

    “the scourge of Nazism”

    Really? What “scourge”?

    Proof required.

    recommended:

    ‘Responsibility for WW2′ https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=7544

    Who started bombing civilians first:Germany or Great Britain https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=8172

    Operation Barbarossa Was A Preventive Attack https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=7999

    http://www.codoh.com

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  66. Tyrion 2 says:
    @Randal
    Well now that you've confirmed that it was intended as a contradiction, at least it's possible to twist it into something that might make sense as such.

    It appears you tried to argue something along the lines of: in your opinion nothing like the piece above has been published and therefore my original assertion is false. But your assertion is either outright false or irrelevant. If you intended to mean that nothing expressing similar views and facts to it has previously been published then you might be correct but since the circumstances that gave rise to its expression and that it describes are those pertaining now and not in the past, clearly the fact has no relevance to anything, let alone the point you seem to have thought you were refuting. If on the other hand you intended to argue that nothing similar in kind to it - offending against establishment dogmas at length and in controversial and sometimes polemic form, has ever been published, then you are simply incorrect. That kind of stuff was routinely published in the weightier leftwing publications of the past. That, of course, was when the left was exploiting the arguments for political freedom of speech to defend its own side's supposed right to offend and to shock, rather than, as the left does now, forgetting its past loyalty to that doctrine in order to suppress dissenting speech to its own now dominant dogmas as "hate speech" etc.

    And your argument fails as basic logic in any event, even if your above assertion were not either incorrect or irrelevant. Whether or not anything similar has ever been published in the past does not, as a matter of basic logic, have any decisive bearing on the question of whether or not it would be published today if we lived in a country in which the publishers and writers would not be harassed out of employment and quite possibly imprisoned for publishing it.

    Its vileness disqualifies it.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Randal
    Nothing "vile" about it, except in the sense that it shocks those, like you, who have grown up with the systematic suppression of the views it promotes.

    You need to understand that this kind of piece is the direct counter to all the propaganda pieces that promote antiracism in order to suppress opposition to mass immigration that we are fed constantly to reinforce the "black good, white bad" establishment line. The systematic suppression of pieces like this versus the endless promotion of pieces pushing antiracist and internationalist ideology, such as the "negrolatry" stuff relating to Stephen Lawrence highlighted by John Derbyshire, is precisely how our culture has been engineered so that you find this kind of stuff so "vile". One doesn't have to particularly like this stuff in isolation to grasp that it is a necessary balance if society is not to veer off into the kind of ideologically based lunacy that ours has over the past few decades.

    That is how resistance to mass immigration was suppressed in the Enoch Powell days, and it is all the more entrenched nowadays. Relative young'uns like you (I assume) have grown up with it all around you and internalised it. A half century and more ago it was not shocking to report, for instance, that crimes by black people were committed by black people, before social engineering agencies such as the NUJ made it racist to do so and forced their members to comply with "codes of conduct" that systematically manipulated the reporting of news.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  67. @Wally
    "The Nazis claimed that Aryans were a superior race"

    No they didn't. Simple as that.

    www.codoh.com

    Hitler did.
    But racial superiority ideas were nothing special at the time, the brother of the 1938 München Chamberlain wrote a book trying to show that European racial superiority explained the success of Europe in the world:
    Houston Stewart Chamberlain, ‘Die Grundlagen des Neunzehnten Jahrhunderts’, 1898- 1907, München
    A far better explanation one finds in
    Felipe Fernández-Armesto, ‘Civilisations’, London, 2000
    Population pressure, and the unique North Sea.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wally
    Please give us a verbatim Hitler quote with reference where Hitler says:
    "The Nazis claimed that Aryans were a superior race"


    www.codoh.com
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  68. Anon[436] • Disclaimer says:
    @Georgiaboy61
    While it is tempting to feel a sense of schadenfreude - that wonderful German word, which means to feel relief or pleasure at the misfortunate of another - over the predicament of Great Britain and a number of other nations in western-northern Europe, it is ultimately unfair to do so.

    This is so because they - the British people - like their peers across western and northern Europe, have been the targets of a decades-long psychological warfare operation waged against them by their own elites. Meaning the globalist oligarchs who now grasp the levers of power across so much of the western world.

    One of your very own, physician Anthony M. Daniels, a.k.a. Theodore Dalrymple - was among the first to recognize political correctness for what it was (and remains today),

    "Political correctness is communist propaganda writ small. In my study of communist societies, I came to the conclusion that the purpose of communist propaganda was not to persuade or convince, nor to inform, but to humiliate; and therefore, the less it corresponded to reality the better. When people are forced to remain silent when they are being told the most obvious lies, or even worse when they are forced to repeat the lies themselves, they lose once and for all their sense of probity. To assent to obvious lies is to co-operate with evil, and in some small way to become evil oneself. One’s standing to resist anything is thus eroded, and even destroyed. A society of emasculated liars is easy to control. I think if you examine political correctness, it has the same effect and is intended to."

    Far from being benign, P.C. - as it is abbreviated - is a potent form of psychological conditioning )brain-washing) as well as a highly-effective form of censorship.

    Political correctness is a form of Cultural Marxism, a century-old movement which applies classical economic Marxism to culture - and seeks thereby to attack and ultimately destroy the foundations of western civilization. The 100-year march through the institutions of western civilization was, by their lights, a success - because today Cultural Marxism is the most-dominant ideology in the West, especially within its elites and leadership class.

    Resistance must begin with an accurate appraisal of the enemy and his intentions. The western elites, being globalists who want one-world government, are using the soldiers of Allah - the Muslims - as the shock troops of their movement. Perhaps significant numbers of western elites have already, albeit in secret, converted to Islam. Angela Merkel is one possibility and there are certainly others.

    In other words, the common people - wherever in Europe they call home - must realize that they face not one but two enemies - the Muslims themselves, and their Quisling enablers and helpers within the West itself.

    Yes, yes, I nod my head approvingly. Well written too. And then….. is he a troll? Is he barking? Weatern elites secretly converted to Islam, including perhaps Angela Merkel!!! Don’t leave us in suspense. Tell us it was just a naughty joke thrown in at the end to see how many maddies would bite.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  69. Randal says:
    @republic
    A serious question to Uk readers: would posting this on facebook in the UK be a crime today?

    A serious question to Uk readers: would posting this on facebook in the UK be a crime today?

    Well one of the problems with speechcrime laws in general is that they are all necessarily very subjective, putting the individual at the mercy of the personal opinions and interpretations of policemen, prosecutors and judges, and ultimately of politicians (who do control the process in practice at the top level, for all the official claims of constitutional separation). I think it’s obvious that large parts of this article could easily be interpreted by such people as “incitement to racial hatred”, which is a crime. Beyond that, it’s a matter of what practices and policies are followed in practice by the police, prosecutors and courts.

    These things are developing, because these laws were introduced fairly recently (over the past few decades) and clearly contradict the basic freedom of speech that Englishmen believe they have a right to, so those in power are cautious about enforcing them too far and too quickly for fear of a popular backlash. The process goes forward in conjunction with other social engineering to establish “racism” as a political and social taboo, and separate from the protections of freedom of speech in the minds of the general populace.

    One indicator of how far this process of social engineering has already gone was given in the recent Brexit campaign, when serious establishment figures reported a political party with substantial popular support to the police merely for a poster, and expected their referral to be taken seriously rather than openly laughed at and generally condemned as an outrage against political liberty:

    Nigel Farage’s anti-migrant poster reported to police

    Facebook and other social media posts certainly have been the basis for supposedly “racist” speechcrime prosecutions, but mostly for relatively frivolous postings of songs, comedy etc so far, mostly driven by jewish and other identity lobby pressure. It is likely only a matter of time before the practice extends to articles like this one.

    In practice, the suppression of such pieces is achieved by political control of the journalist and editorial and ownership classes. No establishment publication would publish such a piece today because of its political content, If an owner of such a publication were to try to do so, he would face open and public rebellion by his editors and journalists who would probably have to be replaced, action by the NUJ (the journalists’ union – openly in favour of suppression of dissent) against any journalists he brought in to replace the leftists he sacked, and a massive economic and political campaign to destroy the publication and the owner. If it became a high enough profile issue this would involve violent threats and mob attacks against the owner and publication, winked at by the police, and economic harassment – denial of bank accounts, premises etc: all these have been used against allegedly “racist” organisations and individuals in the past) Publication simply would not happen, though, because as far as the aforementioned classes are concerned there are certain opinions you just do not express. This is how British censorship has always worked, as Orwell famously noted.

    TL;DR: The piece is clearly illegal in England and Wales under the letter of the current law, using the likely interpretations that would be employed by establishment figures such as police, prosecutors and judges if they were politically free to do so. Whether it would in practice be actioned by the establishment depends upon the circumstances. Probably not yet, but quite possibly, if the senior politicians who would control the process were to decide they could get away with it.

    We are in a race between the increasing normalisation of speechcrime prosecutions in the countries of the US sphere (the intention is clearly to obtain a Supreme Court decision declaring “hate speech” outside the protection of the First Amendment as well, so the US itself will ultimately be brought into line on this, if the bipartisan establishment gets their way there, with a few more leftist SC appointments), and growing recognition of the problems caused by antiracism and mass immigration. There will be martyrs and conflict, for sure.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Gordo
    Yes, that's pretty much it.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  70. Swan Knight says: • Website

    Great article. Will a great awakening occur? Will it require a unifying leader or cells of the informed and aware. The pressure cooker has no safety valve. The stick insect reference is appropriate. We know a Black. The Jews mingle among us

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  71. @Jake
    Wait a doggone minute - I've been told my whole life by the Elites that England created rule of law and democracy and fairness. I've been told that all good things flow from Anglo-Saxon history. If that Anglo-Saxon sense of history and culture crammed down my throat is valid, then we all should be celebrating what the WASP Elites of the UK and the US have been doing for decades to flood their realms with non-whites and non-Christians, and then grant them special rights and privileges, thereby shackling at least the poorer half of their white underlings.

    Long term, that is suicidal, the kind that Elites can ignore until the very end because they seem to be above it.

    And that is not a strange new deviation from WASP culture: that is WASP culture.

    Anglo-Saxon Puritanism was a Judaizing heresy. It is impossible to take Judaizing heresy out of WASP culture. Oliver Cromwell making alliance with Jews, taking Jewish money and allowing Jews back into England with special rights and privileges, was done precisely to secure the money needed to wage war to batter into total submission all non-WASP natives of the British Isles. It was WASP allied with Jew to destroy all other whites.

    All secularized forms of Anglo-Saxon Puritanism have contributed to that process. And as the British Empire was the largest and wealthiest in world history, and as the USA merely took over administration of that original WASP Empire, the mess was spread across the globe.

    WASP culture is playing out toward its end game, which Archetypal WASP Oliver Cromwell realized deep in his black heart: ally with Jews to destroy all white Christian cultures.

    YAAawwnn!

    Same problem in France, Italy and Spain yet they are overwhelmingly Catholic.

    Find another, more fitting and not so laughable theory to clear Jewish influence or stop boring the internet with your half baked nonsense.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  72. Randal says:
    @Tyrion 2
    Its vileness disqualifies it.

    Nothing “vile” about it, except in the sense that it shocks those, like you, who have grown up with the systematic suppression of the views it promotes.

    You need to understand that this kind of piece is the direct counter to all the propaganda pieces that promote antiracism in order to suppress opposition to mass immigration that we are fed constantly to reinforce the “black good, white bad” establishment line. The systematic suppression of pieces like this versus the endless promotion of pieces pushing antiracist and internationalist ideology, such as the “negrolatry” stuff relating to Stephen Lawrence highlighted by John Derbyshire, is precisely how our culture has been engineered so that you find this kind of stuff so “vile”. One doesn’t have to particularly like this stuff in isolation to grasp that it is a necessary balance if society is not to veer off into the kind of ideologically based lunacy that ours has over the past few decades.

    That is how resistance to mass immigration was suppressed in the Enoch Powell days, and it is all the more entrenched nowadays. Relative young’uns like you (I assume) have grown up with it all around you and internalised it. A half century and more ago it was not shocking to report, for instance, that crimes by black people were committed by black people, before social engineering agencies such as the NUJ made it racist to do so and forced their members to comply with “codes of conduct” that systematically manipulated the reporting of news.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Tyrion 2

    A half century and more ago it was not shocking to report, for instance, that crimes by black people were committed by black people
     
    Its vileness is not in that. It is in the vindictive and arbitrary way it is written. It reminds me of a gossip column but where the subjects killed the cat of the bitter old lady who wrote it. The taste is noxious.

    You need to understand that this kind of piece is the direct counter to all the propaganda pieces that promote antiracism in order to suppress opposition to mass immigration that we are fed constantly to reinforce the “black good, white bad” establishment line
     
    You say it is a direct counter. Those it supposedly counters would say that they are countering it. Historically they would have more of a point, though not a whole one, while presently you have more of a point, though not a whole one either.

    I'm not interested in articles that read like wartime propaganda, though in the case of desperate war, I can see their purpose.

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  73. @Reginald Pudgington III
    This cracks me up. I remember when they used to say this stuff about dagos and wops. And it was always fussy little pencilnecks who were scared the foreign devils were better than them in the sack. My condolences for your floppy little dick, whitey.

    Come on. What kind of pantywaist objects to a wider variety of sex partners?

    Indeed, what kind of person objects to a wider variety of exotic restaurants and sex partners and more vibrant street markets?

    One with enough brains to understand and use the concept of net benefit to his advantage, you dim-wit.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Reginald Pudginton III
    Check out this epsiilon male.

    On the one hand, there is, say, Eva Longoria, with genes that scoured up every bit of hot DNA in the human genome

    On the other hand, there is net benefit to his advantage

    Joe Chorea's gonna fap to net benefit to his advantage, and keep his genes pure. A perfect example of how natural selection keeps the species viable.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  74. @Wally
    "The Nazis claimed that Aryans were a superior race"

    No they didn't. Simple as that.

    www.codoh.com

    Really? Seems pretty clearly stated:

    “Würde man die Menschheit in drei Arten einteilen: in Kulturbegründer, Kulturträger und Kulturzerstörer, dann käme als Vertreter der ersten wohl nur der Arier in Frage. Von ihm stammen die Fundamente und Mauern aller menschlichen Schöpfungen, und nur die äußere Form und Farbe sind bedingt durch die jeweiligen Charakterzüge der einzelnen Völker.”

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wally
    No source, of course.

    Laughable as usual.

    Please give us a verbatim quote with reference where 'Nazis' say:
    "The Nazis claimed that Aryans were a superior race"

    www.codoh.com

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  75. @Joe Correa
    Indeed, what kind of person objects to a wider variety of exotic restaurants and sex partners and more vibrant street markets?

    One with enough brains to understand and use the concept of net benefit to his advantage, you dim-wit.

    Check out this epsiilon male.

    On the one hand, there is, say, Eva Longoria, with genes that scoured up every bit of hot DNA in the human genome

    On the other hand, there is net benefit to his advantage

    Joe Chorea’s gonna fap to net benefit to his advantage, and keep his genes pure. A perfect example of how natural selection keeps the species viable.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  76. Rape panic is a common pathology of degenerate ethnic groups like Britons or Israelis. Note the parallels:

    SG: I feel like taking her, and putting her in the center of Gaza!
    LL: Yes!
    SG: Alone!
    LL: Yes!
    SG: And leaving her there!
    LL: Yes! And let’s see what happens!
    SG: And let’s see what would happen to her, the stupid woman!

    https://niqnaq.wordpress.com/2018/05/01/fun-attitudes/

    Degenerate Israelis obsess about priapic foreign subhumans raping their women just like degenerate Brits obsess about priapic foreign subhumans raping their women. The sublimated issue here is that hot women with brass ovaries like Adi Shosberger or Heidi Klum bonk who they want – and that’s not you flaccid weaklings, Is it? All you get is Jimmy Savile up yo butt.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  77. lavoisier says: • Website
    @Georgiaboy61
    While it is tempting to feel a sense of schadenfreude - that wonderful German word, which means to feel relief or pleasure at the misfortunate of another - over the predicament of Great Britain and a number of other nations in western-northern Europe, it is ultimately unfair to do so.

    This is so because they - the British people - like their peers across western and northern Europe, have been the targets of a decades-long psychological warfare operation waged against them by their own elites. Meaning the globalist oligarchs who now grasp the levers of power across so much of the western world.

    One of your very own, physician Anthony M. Daniels, a.k.a. Theodore Dalrymple - was among the first to recognize political correctness for what it was (and remains today),

    "Political correctness is communist propaganda writ small. In my study of communist societies, I came to the conclusion that the purpose of communist propaganda was not to persuade or convince, nor to inform, but to humiliate; and therefore, the less it corresponded to reality the better. When people are forced to remain silent when they are being told the most obvious lies, or even worse when they are forced to repeat the lies themselves, they lose once and for all their sense of probity. To assent to obvious lies is to co-operate with evil, and in some small way to become evil oneself. One’s standing to resist anything is thus eroded, and even destroyed. A society of emasculated liars is easy to control. I think if you examine political correctness, it has the same effect and is intended to."

    Far from being benign, P.C. - as it is abbreviated - is a potent form of psychological conditioning )brain-washing) as well as a highly-effective form of censorship.

    Political correctness is a form of Cultural Marxism, a century-old movement which applies classical economic Marxism to culture - and seeks thereby to attack and ultimately destroy the foundations of western civilization. The 100-year march through the institutions of western civilization was, by their lights, a success - because today Cultural Marxism is the most-dominant ideology in the West, especially within its elites and leadership class.

    Resistance must begin with an accurate appraisal of the enemy and his intentions. The western elites, being globalists who want one-world government, are using the soldiers of Allah - the Muslims - as the shock troops of their movement. Perhaps significant numbers of western elites have already, albeit in secret, converted to Islam. Angela Merkel is one possibility and there are certainly others.

    In other words, the common people - wherever in Europe they call home - must realize that they face not one but two enemies - the Muslims themselves, and their Quisling enablers and helpers within the West itself.

    Theodore Dalrymple is one of the writers I admire.

    I think it really boils down to cultural Marxism writ large. It infects the brain and forces people to lie about all sorts of things.

    This to me is the sickness, the power, the ability to destroy societies and civilization.

    I do not see Muslims as the bogeyman. They could easily be dealt with, and fairly too, if we did not have to deal with the madness of the white liberals infected with cultural Marxism who make excuses for the inexcusable.

    White liberals are the problem. Unless we can learn how to constrain their sickness Western Civilization is doomed.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Georgiaboy61
    @ Lavoisier

    "I do not see Muslims as the bogeyman. They could easily be dealt with, and fairly too, if we did not have to deal with the madness of the white liberals infected with cultural Marxism who make excuses for the inexcusable."

    "White liberals are the problem. Unless we can learn how to constrain their sickness Western Civilization is doomed."

    We can debate whether the Cultural Marxists - "The Reds" - are using the Muslims - "The Greens" - or vice-versa, but each half of the Red-Green Alliance will eventually have to be dealt with, if not together then separately.

    The Muslims must be taken seriously as a threat, if for no other reason than because of their 1,400-year history of jihad against non-Muslim civilization, their numbers, and the fanaticism of their most-committed shahids (true believers). Not to mention the fact that they are the ones actually committing most of the bloodshed and violence now occurring in Europe and the Middle East.

    The difficulty with the Cultural Marxists, in particular those who are members of the western ruling elites, is that they have burrowed themselves deeply into the fabric of the West. Additionally, many of these individuals are extremely wealthy, extremely power, or both.

    Many of these elites have mastered the art of camouflaging themselves and their actions to the extent that proving their guilty and malfeasance won't be easy. Light is the best disinfectant, but these are creatures who prefer to remain in the shadows and it won't be easy to smoke them out.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  78. Gordo says:
    @Randal

    A serious question to Uk readers: would posting this on facebook in the UK be a crime today?
     
    Well one of the problems with speechcrime laws in general is that they are all necessarily very subjective, putting the individual at the mercy of the personal opinions and interpretations of policemen, prosecutors and judges, and ultimately of politicians (who do control the process in practice at the top level, for all the official claims of constitutional separation). I think it's obvious that large parts of this article could easily be interpreted by such people as "incitement to racial hatred", which is a crime. Beyond that, it's a matter of what practices and policies are followed in practice by the police, prosecutors and courts.

    These things are developing, because these laws were introduced fairly recently (over the past few decades) and clearly contradict the basic freedom of speech that Englishmen believe they have a right to, so those in power are cautious about enforcing them too far and too quickly for fear of a popular backlash. The process goes forward in conjunction with other social engineering to establish "racism" as a political and social taboo, and separate from the protections of freedom of speech in the minds of the general populace.

    One indicator of how far this process of social engineering has already gone was given in the recent Brexit campaign, when serious establishment figures reported a political party with substantial popular support to the police merely for a poster, and expected their referral to be taken seriously rather than openly laughed at and generally condemned as an outrage against political liberty:

    Nigel Farage's anti-migrant poster reported to police

    Facebook and other social media posts certainly have been the basis for supposedly "racist" speechcrime prosecutions, but mostly for relatively frivolous postings of songs, comedy etc so far, mostly driven by jewish and other identity lobby pressure. It is likely only a matter of time before the practice extends to articles like this one.

    In practice, the suppression of such pieces is achieved by political control of the journalist and editorial and ownership classes. No establishment publication would publish such a piece today because of its political content, If an owner of such a publication were to try to do so, he would face open and public rebellion by his editors and journalists who would probably have to be replaced, action by the NUJ (the journalists' union - openly in favour of suppression of dissent) against any journalists he brought in to replace the leftists he sacked, and a massive economic and political campaign to destroy the publication and the owner. If it became a high enough profile issue this would involve violent threats and mob attacks against the owner and publication, winked at by the police, and economic harassment - denial of bank accounts, premises etc: all these have been used against allegedly "racist" organisations and individuals in the past) Publication simply would not happen, though, because as far as the aforementioned classes are concerned there are certain opinions you just do not express. This is how British censorship has always worked, as Orwell famously noted.

    TL;DR: The piece is clearly illegal in England and Wales under the letter of the current law, using the likely interpretations that would be employed by establishment figures such as police, prosecutors and judges if they were politically free to do so. Whether it would in practice be actioned by the establishment depends upon the circumstances. Probably not yet, but quite possibly, if the senior politicians who would control the process were to decide they could get away with it.

    We are in a race between the increasing normalisation of speechcrime prosecutions in the countries of the US sphere (the intention is clearly to obtain a Supreme Court decision declaring "hate speech" outside the protection of the First Amendment as well, so the US itself will ultimately be brought into line on this, if the bipartisan establishment gets their way there, with a few more leftist SC appointments), and growing recognition of the problems caused by antiracism and mass immigration. There will be martyrs and conflict, for sure.

    Yes, that’s pretty much it.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  79. Tyrion 2 says:
    @Randal
    Nothing "vile" about it, except in the sense that it shocks those, like you, who have grown up with the systematic suppression of the views it promotes.

    You need to understand that this kind of piece is the direct counter to all the propaganda pieces that promote antiracism in order to suppress opposition to mass immigration that we are fed constantly to reinforce the "black good, white bad" establishment line. The systematic suppression of pieces like this versus the endless promotion of pieces pushing antiracist and internationalist ideology, such as the "negrolatry" stuff relating to Stephen Lawrence highlighted by John Derbyshire, is precisely how our culture has been engineered so that you find this kind of stuff so "vile". One doesn't have to particularly like this stuff in isolation to grasp that it is a necessary balance if society is not to veer off into the kind of ideologically based lunacy that ours has over the past few decades.

    That is how resistance to mass immigration was suppressed in the Enoch Powell days, and it is all the more entrenched nowadays. Relative young'uns like you (I assume) have grown up with it all around you and internalised it. A half century and more ago it was not shocking to report, for instance, that crimes by black people were committed by black people, before social engineering agencies such as the NUJ made it racist to do so and forced their members to comply with "codes of conduct" that systematically manipulated the reporting of news.

    A half century and more ago it was not shocking to report, for instance, that crimes by black people were committed by black people

    Its vileness is not in that. It is in the vindictive and arbitrary way it is written. It reminds me of a gossip column but where the subjects killed the cat of the bitter old lady who wrote it. The taste is noxious.

    You need to understand that this kind of piece is the direct counter to all the propaganda pieces that promote antiracism in order to suppress opposition to mass immigration that we are fed constantly to reinforce the “black good, white bad” establishment line

    You say it is a direct counter. Those it supposedly counters would say that they are countering it. Historically they would have more of a point, though not a whole one, while presently you have more of a point, though not a whole one either.

    I’m not interested in articles that read like wartime propaganda, though in the case of desperate war, I can see their purpose.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  80. Wally says:
    @Andrew E. Mathis
    Really? Seems pretty clearly stated:

    “Würde man die Menschheit in drei Arten einteilen: in Kulturbegründer, Kulturträger und Kulturzerstörer, dann käme als Vertreter der ersten wohl nur der Arier in Frage. Von ihm stammen die Fundamente und Mauern aller menschlichen Schöpfungen, und nur die äußere Form und Farbe sind bedingt durch die jeweiligen Charakterzüge der einzelnen Völker.”

    No source, of course.

    Laughable as usual.

    Please give us a verbatim quote with reference where ‘Nazis’ say:
    “The Nazis claimed that Aryans were a superior race”

    http://www.codoh.com

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  81. Wally says:
    @jilles dykstra
    Hitler did.
    But racial superiority ideas were nothing special at the time, the brother of the 1938 München Chamberlain wrote a book trying to show that European racial superiority explained the success of Europe in the world:
    Houston Stewart Chamberlain, ‘Die Grundlagen des Neunzehnten Jahrhunderts’, 1898- 1907, München
    A far better explanation one finds in
    Felipe Fernández-Armesto, ‘Civilisations’, London, 2000
    Population pressure, and the unique North Sea.

    Please give us a verbatim Hitler quote with reference where Hitler says:
    “The Nazis claimed that Aryans were a superior race”

    http://www.codoh.com

    Read More
    • Replies: @Andrew E. Mathis
    I gave it to you already, but here it is again:

    Würde man die Menschheit in drei Arten einteilen: in Kulturbegründer, Kulturträger und Kulturzerstörer, dann käme als Vertreter der ersten wohl nur der Arier in Frage. Von ihm stammen die Fundamente und Mauern aller menschlichen Schöpfungen, und nur die äußere Form und Farbe sind bedingt durch die jeweiligen Charakterzüge der einzelnen Völker.
     
    And your reference information:

    Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf (Munich: Zwentralverlag der NSDAP, 1943), p. 318.

    I have it on microfilm.

    Gern geschehen.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  82. @Wally
    Please give us a verbatim Hitler quote with reference where Hitler says:
    "The Nazis claimed that Aryans were a superior race"


    www.codoh.com

    I gave it to you already, but here it is again:

    Würde man die Menschheit in drei Arten einteilen: in Kulturbegründer, Kulturträger und Kulturzerstörer, dann käme als Vertreter der ersten wohl nur der Arier in Frage. Von ihm stammen die Fundamente und Mauern aller menschlichen Schöpfungen, und nur die äußere Form und Farbe sind bedingt durch die jeweiligen Charakterzüge der einzelnen Völker.

    And your reference information:

    Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf (Munich: Zwentralverlag der NSDAP, 1943), p. 318.

    I have it on microfilm.

    Gern geschehen.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wally
    Now that is true desperation from an already debunked Zionist.

    What it says is:


    "If humanity were to be divided into three types: founders of culture, bearers of culture, and destroyers of culture, the representative of the first would probably be the Aryan. From him come the foundations and walls of all human creations, and only the external form and color are conditioned by the respective characteristics of the individual peoples."

     

    'Founders of culture' is certainly not the same as "The Nazis claimed that Aryans were a superior race”. LOL

    Andrew Mathis loses again.

    www.codoh.com

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  83. @Georgiaboy61
    Research the life and ideology of Count Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi, the biracial (Austrian-Japanese) founder of the United Europe movement which led directly to the European Union of today - and had a disproportionate influence upon globalism as a movement.

    Kalergi - who claimed to have opposed Hitler and National Socialism - was a eugenicist who believed that the ideal European of the future would be a hybrid of white native Europeans and darker-skinned peoples from the Third World - and supported social engineering policies to that end, which is exactly what the EU is undertaking today.

    The Nazis claimed that Aryans were a superior race, whereas the Imperial Japanese claimed also to be racially-superior not only to their East Asian cousins, but the barbarians in America in Europe. And so on and so forth. Now, it is the globalists claiming to be the master race, and that everyone else is their inferior. The same old totalitarian wine in new bottles, one might say.

    The Kalergi Plan? Seriously?!?

    Nobody has ever taken that shit seriously. It is one of history’s many dead ends that, for some reason, certain oddballs feel compelled to keep talking about. Your mindless defamation of the Nazis indicates that you are far too thick to join the discussion here. This is not Breitbart, my friend.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Georgiaboy61
    Re: "The Kalergi Plan? Seriously?!? Nobody has ever taken that shit seriously. It is one of history’s many dead ends that, for some reason, certain oddballs feel compelled to keep talking about. Your mindless defamation of the Nazis indicates that you are far too thick to join the discussion here. This is not Breitbart, my friend."

    The old saying goes, "If you aren't taking flak, you aren't over the target"

    I'm not your friend, sport. When bottom-feeders like you come out into the light to protest, that is proof-positive that my rhetorical ordnance is finding its mark. You have no evidence, no facts, no rational basis to support yours claims - in short, your reply is nothing more than a waste of time. Anyone who has to resort to ad-hominem attacks - as you have done - has already lost the argument.

    Re: "Your mindless defamation of the Nazis indicates that you are far too thick to join the discussion here."

    Upset that your latest issue of Der Stürmer didn't come in the mail? Thanks for making your complete moral-and-intellectual bankruptcy obvious for all to see.

    , @James Forrestal
    Perhaps doing a search for ""Charlemagne Prize" might help to alleviate your pathetic ignorance, if only slightly. You're welcome.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  84. lavoisier says: • Website
    @Josecanuc
    First I applaud you for another magnificent illustration of tour de force writing. I wish I could write half, a third as well as you do.

    ‘I believe their object to be as impure as the means by which their power has been acquired, and denounce them..” Whig MP Thomas Duncombe, February 1828

    Arnold White, British writer in his book The Modern Jew, 1898 concluded (in 1898) that the Jews were making “monotonous progress toward the mastery of the world.” (In Isadore Singer, Russia at the Bar of the American People: A Memorial of Kishinef , New York, 1904)

    Condorcet, an 18th century French mathematician-philosopher theorized that if a highly organized, highly motivated, essentially amoral, highly tenacious minority all worked together towards a single mission or goal akin to the style a great football team does to achieve a goal do - they could - if they kept their dementia hidden and pretended to me ordinary human beings (‘you can’t fight what you can’t see, what is deliberately kept hidden” - and ‘people are caught hoodwinked by appearance - and appearance is all there is in the world”) - even if they did not own or control the so called democracy’s mass media, their banks and their academia - could - because of the incredulity and naive sophomoric mind of the average citizen who thinks there are highly educated very smart people who are paid to act as a ‘firewall’ to protect them from anything nefarious happening to their nation or to prevent them from being enslaved by a few i.e., university professors, M16, politicians, preachers, - you know who I am referring - all the
    charlatan plastic puppet professors and politicians - the highly motivated righteous could - through perseverance (“Great works are performed realized not by strength, but by perseverance.” Samuel Johnson) - could achieve total control over the democratic nation simply because of the low grade affected character of the charlatan politicians - as most of the con artist politicians in the Capitalistic Christian West must be because as Plato said: “‘dishonesty is more profitable than honesty.”

    When the goal that this highly motivated minority strives to achieve relates to a sacrosanct unbreakable indestructible covenant (bond) with some ancient war God named YHWH that concerns the most significant pivotal momentous profound consequential commitment responsibility (or burden and yoke) in the entire Universe i.e., to be mankind’s blessing and light, to uplift humanity and to heal and cure and inherit (acquire) the earth - the ‘End’ the fulfillment of the covenant - must always absolve the means utilized to fulfill it - whether it is subjugating Christian nations such as England and via the highly amoral minority’s control of the mass media and their control of their low grade politicians then compelling them to
    subjugate Iraq and now destroy Syria and at the same time organize and compel them to subjugated the remainder of the world i.e., Iran, Russia, China, etc.

    I think this is what H G Wells meant when he wrote: “It is not much good thinking of a thing unless you think it out.” Wells also thought that ‘There is room for some very serious research into the question why antisemitism emerges in every country the Jews reside in.’

    “One thing I have come to know thoroughly: the abysmal lack of character in man.” Kierkegaard

    Insightful.

    I have always believed that the only way a small minority of Jewish individuals could hijack Western nations to serve theirnefarious ends required an ample supply of brain dead and venal Goyim.

    Without such treacherous accomplices, Jewish manipulation would have gone nowhere.

    Too many of the Goyim have been willing accomplices to the destruction of their civilization.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Josecanuc
    “We are their slaves - the Jews are our Masters.” Martin Luther, 1504

    For Nietzsche the development of the moral nature of the human, all too human has, as its result, the "last men." By “last” Nietzsche means after them, no significant evolution (progress) is possible. The species has, so to speak, played itself out and can evolve no further. While Nietzsche finds that men prey on themselves less in master morality, he also realizes, as had Rousseau before him, and Freud after, that it is in slave morality that much of Western culture has evolved. Nietzsche had concluded: "There are master and slave moralities.”

    A moral slave individual is defined according to his or her "nature," not according to his profession.... there is no reason why someone who occupies the status of a president or king might not be slavely moral. The mere fact that one might happen to control the destinies of millions of people is, in itself, no indication that one is a master. Conversely, a "slave" is not impotent, at least in the sense of lacking a will. What counts, in both cases, is the particular relationship between one's sense of self and one's sense of others. One does not have slave morality in the same manner as one has social-economic status, or even in the manner in which one is Negro or Anglo-Saxon. Master and slave morality may thus be found in some combination in anyone. There is no doubt that Nietzsche sees the last 2300 years as increasingly dominated by slave morality. In the passages in which Nietzsche describes the shift from master to slave morality, a number of important observations stand out. The masters "do not know guilt, responsibility, or consideration"; they are "born organizers."

    “Somehow the Jew is of this struggle and yet not in it. Perhaps he is a sort of director, unofficial (Puppet) master of ceremonies. I don't know.” Nietzsche, My Sister and I
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  85. lavoisier says: • Website
    @Realist

    Anti-bullying activists are not publicizing the murder and we can be confident that there will be no official enquiry and that no martyr-cult will ever surround her. Why so? Because Valaree Megan Schwab was White and her murderer is Black, like the rest of the gang that bullied her.
     
    Self hating Whites allow this.

    Self hating whites DO NOT hate themselves.

    They hate other white people who do not subscribe to their leftist dogma that all people are equal (except the white people who do not believe this and should just die) and that people of color are sacred.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Realist

    ....and that people of color are sacred.
     
    As I said self hating Whites.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  86. Wally says:
    @Andrew E. Mathis
    I gave it to you already, but here it is again:

    Würde man die Menschheit in drei Arten einteilen: in Kulturbegründer, Kulturträger und Kulturzerstörer, dann käme als Vertreter der ersten wohl nur der Arier in Frage. Von ihm stammen die Fundamente und Mauern aller menschlichen Schöpfungen, und nur die äußere Form und Farbe sind bedingt durch die jeweiligen Charakterzüge der einzelnen Völker.
     
    And your reference information:

    Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf (Munich: Zwentralverlag der NSDAP, 1943), p. 318.

    I have it on microfilm.

    Gern geschehen.

    Now that is true desperation from an already debunked Zionist.

    What it says is:

    If humanity were to be divided into three types: founders of culture, bearers of culture, and destroyers of culture, the representative of the first would probably be the Aryan. From him come the foundations and walls of all human creations, and only the external form and color are conditioned by the respective characteristics of the individual peoples.”

    ‘Founders of culture‘ is certainly not the same as “The Nazis claimed that Aryans were a superior race”. LOL

    Andrew Mathis loses again.

    http://www.codoh.com

    Read More
    • Troll: Andrew E. Mathis
    • Replies: @Wally
    IOW, Andrew Mathis as usual made a fool of himself & can't back up his claims.
    It is he that's a TROLL.
    LOL

    Still waiting for him & any others to back up the empty claim that:

    "The Nazis claimed that Aryans were a superior race”.

    That was easy.

    www.codoh.com

    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  87. @Intelligent Dasein
    The Kalergi Plan? Seriously?!?

    Nobody has ever taken that shit seriously. It is one of history's many dead ends that, for some reason, certain oddballs feel compelled to keep talking about. Your mindless defamation of the Nazis indicates that you are far too thick to join the discussion here. This is not Breitbart, my friend.

    Re: “The Kalergi Plan? Seriously?!? Nobody has ever taken that shit seriously. It is one of history’s many dead ends that, for some reason, certain oddballs feel compelled to keep talking about. Your mindless defamation of the Nazis indicates that you are far too thick to join the discussion here. This is not Breitbart, my friend.”

    The old saying goes, “If you aren’t taking flak, you aren’t over the target”

    I’m not your friend, sport. When bottom-feeders like you come out into the light to protest, that is proof-positive that my rhetorical ordnance is finding its mark. You have no evidence, no facts, no rational basis to support yours claims – in short, your reply is nothing more than a waste of time. Anyone who has to resort to ad-hominem attacks – as you have done – has already lost the argument.

    Re: “Your mindless defamation of the Nazis indicates that you are far too thick to join the discussion here.”

    Upset that your latest issue of Der Stürmer didn’t come in the mail? Thanks for making your complete moral-and-intellectual bankruptcy obvious for all to see.

    Read More
    • Replies: @Wally
    Still waiting for you to back up your laughable claim that:

    "The Nazis claimed that Aryans were a superior race”

    www.codoh.com
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  88. @lavoisier
    Theodore Dalrymple is one of the writers I admire.

    I think it really boils down to cultural Marxism writ large. It infects the brain and forces people to lie about all sorts of things.

    This to me is the sickness, the power, the ability to destroy societies and civilization.

    I do not see Muslims as the bogeyman. They could easily be dealt with, and fairly too, if we did not have to deal with the madness of the white liberals infected with cultural Marxism who make excuses for the inexcusable.

    White liberals are the problem. Unless we can learn how to constrain their sickness Western Civilization is doomed.

    @ Lavoisier

    “I do not see Muslims as the bogeyman. They could easily be dealt with, and fairly too, if we did not have to deal with the madness of the white liberals infected with cultural Marxism who make excuses for the inexcusable.”

    “White liberals are the problem. Unless we can learn how to constrain their sickness Western Civilization is doomed.”

    We can debate whether the Cultural Marxists – “The Reds” – are using the Muslims – “The Greens” – or vice-versa, but each half of the Red-Green Alliance will eventually have to be dealt with, if not together then separately.

    The Muslims must be taken seriously as a threat, if for no other reason than because of their 1,400-year history of jihad against non-Muslim civilization, their numbers, and the fanaticism of their most-committed shahids (true believers). Not to mention the fact that they are the ones actually committing most of the bloodshed and violence now occurring in Europe and the Middle East.

    The difficulty with the Cultural Marxists, in particular those who are members of the western ruling elites, is that they have burrowed themselves deeply into the fabric of the West. Additionally, many of these individuals are extremely wealthy, extremely power, or both.

    Many of these elites have mastered the art of camouflaging themselves and their actions to the extent that proving their guilty and malfeasance won’t be easy. Light is the best disinfectant, but these are creatures who prefer to remain in the shadows and it won’t be easy to smoke them out.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  89. Wally says:
    @Wally
    Now that is true desperation from an already debunked Zionist.

    What it says is:


    "If humanity were to be divided into three types: founders of culture, bearers of culture, and destroyers of culture, the representative of the first would probably be the Aryan. From him come the foundations and walls of all human creations, and only the external form and color are conditioned by the respective characteristics of the individual peoples."

     

    'Founders of culture' is certainly not the same as "The Nazis claimed that Aryans were a superior race”. LOL

    Andrew Mathis loses again.

    www.codoh.com

    IOW, Andrew Mathis as usual made a fool of himself & can’t back up his claims.
    It is he that’s a TROLL.
    LOL

    Still waiting for him & any others to back up the empty claim that:

    “The Nazis claimed that Aryans were a superior race”.

    That was easy.

    http://www.codoh.com

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  90. Wally says:
    @Georgiaboy61
    Re: "The Kalergi Plan? Seriously?!? Nobody has ever taken that shit seriously. It is one of history’s many dead ends that, for some reason, certain oddballs feel compelled to keep talking about. Your mindless defamation of the Nazis indicates that you are far too thick to join the discussion here. This is not Breitbart, my friend."

    The old saying goes, "If you aren't taking flak, you aren't over the target"

    I'm not your friend, sport. When bottom-feeders like you come out into the light to protest, that is proof-positive that my rhetorical ordnance is finding its mark. You have no evidence, no facts, no rational basis to support yours claims - in short, your reply is nothing more than a waste of time. Anyone who has to resort to ad-hominem attacks - as you have done - has already lost the argument.

    Re: "Your mindless defamation of the Nazis indicates that you are far too thick to join the discussion here."

    Upset that your latest issue of Der Stürmer didn't come in the mail? Thanks for making your complete moral-and-intellectual bankruptcy obvious for all to see.

    Still waiting for you to back up your laughable claim that:

    “The Nazis claimed that Aryans were a superior race”

    http://www.codoh.com

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  91. Josecanuc says:
    @lavoisier
    Insightful.

    I have always believed that the only way a small minority of Jewish individuals could hijack Western nations to serve theirnefarious ends required an ample supply of brain dead and venal Goyim.

    Without such treacherous accomplices, Jewish manipulation would have gone nowhere.

    Too many of the Goyim have been willing accomplices to the destruction of their civilization.

    “We are their slaves – the Jews are our Masters.” Martin Luther, 1504

    For Nietzsche the development of the moral nature of the human, all too human has, as its result, the “last men.” By “last” Nietzsche means after them, no significant evolution (progress) is possible. The species has, so to speak, played itself out and can evolve no further. While Nietzsche finds that men prey on themselves less in master morality, he also realizes, as had Rousseau before him, and Freud after, that it is in slave morality that much of Western culture has evolved. Nietzsche had concluded: “There are master and slave moralities.”

    A moral slave individual is defined according to his or her “nature,” not according to his profession…. there is no reason why someone who occupies the status of a president or king might not be slavely moral. The mere fact that one might happen to control the destinies of millions of people is, in itself, no indication that one is a master. Conversely, a “slave” is not impotent, at least in the sense of lacking a will. What counts, in both cases, is the particular relationship between one’s sense of self and one’s sense of others. One does not have slave morality in the same manner as one has social-economic status, or even in the manner in which one is Negro or Anglo-Saxon. Master and slave morality may thus be found in some combination in anyone. There is no doubt that Nietzsche sees the last 2300 years as increasingly dominated by slave morality. In the passages in which Nietzsche describes the shift from master to slave morality, a number of important observations stand out. The masters “do not know guilt, responsibility, or consideration”; they are “born organizers.”

    “Somehow the Jew is of this struggle and yet not in it. Perhaps he is a sort of director, unofficial (Puppet) master of ceremonies. I don’t know.” Nietzsche, My Sister and I

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  92. DFH says:
    @Tyrion 2
    Nothing like this piece has ever been published in a mainstream media source of any type in the whole history of Britain, the country that invented the free press.

    Churchill’s ‘Zionism or Communism’ was not too far from (in content, if not tone) some of the articles published on the Occidental Observer

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  93. Realist says:
    @lavoisier

    Self hating whites DO NOT hate themselves.
     
    They hate other white people who do not subscribe to their leftist dogma that all people are equal (except the white people who do not believe this and should just die) and that people of color are sacred.

    ….and that people of color are sacred.

    As I said self hating Whites.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  94. @animalogic
    Mr Langdon should be praised for sheeting home blame for immigration issues to where they belong: Elites (& their "chosen" enforcers & enablers).
    However, his use of such categories as "left" & "right" is of questionable value...although, no doubt there are many who still enjoy the thrilling cut & thrust of debating profundities such as the "Coke v Pepsi" saga.

    his use of such categories as “left” & “right”

    As a self-described leftist I must agree. SJW deplore actual leftists – the fair wage/pro-union/healthcare for all leftists. The OP even makes mention of it

    The so-called Labour party, which was founded to champion the White working-class, instead sided with the elite

    The US Dems were in charge for more than a half century on such a platform. Now the Hillary fan sites are filled with vitriol toward not only working class whites, but anyone who dares to say that those people are just as important as blacks and refugees. And then of course they will blame the next election loss on real liberals who won’t vote for the Clinton/Schumer/Pelosi party.

    Read More
    • Replies: @James Forrestal

    Now the Hillary fan sites are filled with vitriol toward not only working class whites, but anyone who dares to say that those people are just as important as blacks and refugees.
     
    And the various "sexual minorities," of course. Can't forget them.
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  95. Anne Lid says:
    @republic
    A serious question to Uk readers: would posting this on facebook in the UK be a crime today?

    I posted Derb’s on mine, but this one I’m afraid to. The police have bigger fish to fry, on the other hand my black acquaintances are nice people, but objectivity is not necessarily one of their virtues. Besides, soon I will have to find a job.
    You know what, I will post it, and report back. It is not prudent, but inconsequential people can get away with it.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  96. That how religions work, remember Hypatia: you kill when you can’t convince, when there is no health or truth in your vision.

    Jean Elshtain described by the West got over these lies, but we love them anyway, enough to kill.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  97. @Garbage
    What a nasty, fully racist pack of lies.

    Unz.com runs some interesting writers at times. But when nasty, racist piece of animal droppings like this are promoted to the number one story at the top of the front page, my instinct is to run and find the few authors I do like on other sites.

    Just one example ... the assertion that everyone who came in the Windrush migration was of 'low IQ'. No supporting facts given. No results of IQ tests given. And even then I'd mistrust averages and would want to see the highs and low of the tests before I believed the assumption that 'everyone' was of low IQ. Just the assumption that because they were not 'white' they must have a low IQ.

    Its this author obviously has a low IQ and lacks the ability for anysort of logical reasoning.

    Why do you hate White people so much? Let go of your mindless hatred. Try to be more tolerant. Please.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  98. @Intelligent Dasein
    The Kalergi Plan? Seriously?!?

    Nobody has ever taken that shit seriously. It is one of history's many dead ends that, for some reason, certain oddballs feel compelled to keep talking about. Your mindless defamation of the Nazis indicates that you are far too thick to join the discussion here. This is not Breitbart, my friend.

    Perhaps doing a search for “”Charlemagne Prize” might help to alleviate your pathetic ignorance, if only slightly. You’re welcome.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  99. @EliteCommInc.
    Still cowering, hyperventilating and fear mongering over the .3% of potentially violent black citizens. It is tragic when anyone is randomly killed over something as trivial as tastes in music. I assume unlike the murder in Great Britain that someone is being held accountable.

    Though even according to this article things are not as clear you claim.

    https://heavy.com/news/2018/01/valaree-megan-schwab-stabbed-bullied-facebook-photos/

    It is doubtful that we want to go down a path of counting murders by skin color and then proceed to motive to get a wider picture of group is more likely to be killed by whom over skin color.

    The crime stats may include a spike, which is not the same thing as a trend. Attempting to link an increase in crime via of Black Lives Matter is going to a very tough slog (whatever my disagreements with them - they certainly have issues. Shilling for immigrants is but one.). I think this was attempted in detail by Mrs McDonald and in the end, her model fails on several levels overall crime stats contradict her premise. The Ferguson Effect is non-existent. The correlations you note don't even correspond to the community activities in the area. Worse the samples are minuscule compared to the number if cities with similar population sizes and density. But if we are going to play the cause and effect correllation dance here are some other variations to consider.

    1. Economic trends, not just a spike

    http://www.newgeography.com/content/004808-divergent-demographic-and-economic-trends-chicago

    https://wp.nyu.edu/economicinequality/2017/03/29/economic-inequality-in-baltimore-md/

    https://thinkprogress.org/bankers-are-buying-baltimores-debt-charging-families-crazy-interest-rates-then-taking-their-homes-3c181335ae3c/

    https://www.huduser.gov/portal/publications/pdf/BaltimoreMD-comp-16.pdf

    wow prediction from 2001
    http://www.baltimorechronicle.com/ecotrends_dec02.html

    Now I am not a very smart guy. I have a low IQ and I am a lousy writer. But if I were going to consider impacts on crime behavior and police response or law enforcement in general, I hink that the economic picture has a far greater impact on said indices than one protest in either city, despite the minor riot ---

    Ohh wait a minute, Baltimore and Chicago have historically high crime rates compared to most of the country --- say it ain't so.
    https://www.economist.com/news/united-states/21724399-america-gets-safer-marylands-biggest-city-does-not-crime-and-despair-baltimore

    Wait, crime trend in Chicago spikes up and down -- before Ferguson or Trayvon Martin -- this cannot be.
    https://www.economist.com/blogs/democracyinamerica/2014/05/crime-statistics-chicago

    Some other correllations:
    http://www.thecyberhood.net/documents/papers/TM.pdf
    http://chicagopolicyreview.org/2016/01/08/feel-it-in-the-air-pollution-and-crime-in-chicago/


    I think I will end with climate change causes crime.
    -----------------------------------------


    I have no idea if what is going on in Great Britain is about ending democracy or stopping free speech. I have my view, but what I am certain about the sad commentary that passes as high IQ truth about color dynamics in this country. This sounds as hyperbolic as the sky is falling because Pres Trump was elected. And yet he has been the cheer leader for hyperbolic fear mongering on color issues. War on police -- indeed.


    It's tough enough making a conservative case without the fear mongering based on the few incidents used to make the case. The war is not against black citizens. They are not the ones eating away at the country's soul. But you are welcome to point fingers in the wrong direction.

    I congratulate you on your dogged attempt to obfuscate, confuse, and simply bore people into going along with establishment-promoted anti-White dogma, and to minimize the effects of the ongoing non-White invasion. A for effort — F for content.

    Meanwhile, back in the real world, race correlates much more strongly with violent crime than any other demographic factor. By far.

    For a more specific illustration of this very basic, simple, well-known fact:

    New York city keeps excellent statistics on crime by race (FBI stats intentionally conflate White and mestizo criminals, while tracking White and mestizo victims separately, making them trickier to interpret). What do they show?

    In 2014, 96% of all shootings in NYC were committed by Blacks and mestizos. Whites (32.8 percent of the population) committed 1.4% of shootings in 2014. Per capita, Negroes shot people at a rate 77x (not percent, times) that of Whites. Must be due to “stereotype threat,” eh?

    And as far as your ignorant, hate-filled Ferguson effect denialism — murder up 20% over 2 years, with the biggest increases in exactly the areas where BLM terrorists were most active, and where the effect of depolicing was most obvious? Please. Even the commies at the Guardian had to concede that one:

    http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/may/13/ferguson-effect-real-researcher-richard-rosenfield-second-thoughts?CMP=share_btn_tw

    Diversity + proximity = conflict. A simple, basic truth that no amount of lies, ignorance, sophistry and anti-White hatred can ever obscure.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
  100. Excellent piece. Very appropriate to cite the story of SS Windrush at the beginning because, as everyone knows by now, when it comes to the post-WW2 non-White invasion of Britain, this ship was the point of the spear pointed at the heart of the autochthonous British people.

    In 1948, “visible minorities” (non-Whites) made up <0.1% of the British population. Now? More invaders settle in the UK every year (the vast majority non-White) than immigrated in the entire period from 1066-1950.

    Who is behind this deliberate invasion; this planned ethnic flooding; this noxious attempt to displace and destroy the indigenous inhabitants of the British Isles? What was (and is) their motivation? Was it merely some sort of irrational, instinctive, atavistic anti-White hatred, or was it something more complex? Andrew Joyce focused on this topic in an earlier Occidental Observer piece:

    http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2015/07/12/jews-the-ss-empire-windrush-and-the-origins-of-multicultural-britain/

    Who owned the Windrush? Who was responsible for transporting the first invaders? It was originally a German cruise ship, then taken as a war prize by the British at the end of WW2, and used as a transport. It was operated by the New Zealand Shipping Company, which was Jewish owned.

    “The company was for the most part controlled by the Isaacs family, particularly the direct descendants of Henry and George Isaacs. Henry and George left England in 1852 at the instigation of a third brother, Edward, and arrived in Auckland via Melbourne. They established the firm of E & H Isaacs, acting as profiteers during the Taranaki and Waikato war, and winning a number of heavy contracts in connection with the provisioning of the troops.”

    “Henry took a great interest in shipping affairs, and was for many years a member of the Auckland Harbour Board. He was one of the chief shareholders of the Auckland Shipping Company, which was subsequently merged into the New Zealand Shipping Company. The other major shareholders of the company were Laurence and Alfred Nathan, of L.D. Nathan & Company. The Auckland shipping industry, like many colonial shipping routes, had by the 1890s been effectively monopolized by Jews. During 1947 and 1948 many former German vessels were passed on to several of these contracted private companies at the discretion of the Ministry for War and the Ministry for Transport. The Secretary of State for War during these crucial years was none other than Emanuel Shinwell, the socialist son of Polish and Dutch Jews. With a degree of loyalty and patriotism typical of his race, Shinwell was discovered by MI5 to have been passing British secrets to the Irgun* in Palestine in November 1947. To Shinwell, disproportionately handing government vessels and contracts to fellow Jews would have been mere grist to the mill.

    “In 1948 the British Empire was crumbling. India had been granted independence in 1947, and an exhausted, over-stretched, and indebted Britain was busy arranging for the return of colonial troops to their homelands, and the collection of others for present or future conflicts. The Windrush was used mainly for this purpose until in May 1948 the ship’s Jewish operators were given permission by the British Ministry of Transport to increase their profits by filling to capacity with commercial customers (immigrants rather than contracted troops) at Jamaica before returning to Britain with these new settlers. This momentous decision appears to have been taken very arbitrarily (and certainly un-democratically) since it elicited great shock and confusion among British politicians when it later came to light. They might not have been so shocked had they considered the ethnic origin of the head of the Ministry for Transport who authorized that action. The Minister of Transport in that crucial period was Harry Louis Nathan, formerly a member of the law firm of Herbert Oppenheimer, Nathan and Vandyk, and a distant relative of the owners of the NZ Shipping Company.

    For all intents and purposes, the Empire Windrush was passed into Jewish ownership by a Jewish Secretary for War, given the green light to boost profits and start bringing non-Whites to Britain by a Jewish Minister for Transport, and provided with armies of eager passengers by a Jewish-owned media.

    Every. Single. Time.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter Display All Comments
  101. @Sane Left Libertarian

    his use of such categories as “left” & “right”
     
    As a self-described leftist I must agree. SJW deplore actual leftists - the fair wage/pro-union/healthcare for all leftists. The OP even makes mention of it

    The so-called Labour party, which was founded to champion the White working-class, instead sided with the elite
     
    The US Dems were in charge for more than a half century on such a platform. Now the Hillary fan sites are filled with vitriol toward not only working class whites, but anyone who dares to say that those people are just as important as blacks and refugees. And then of course they will blame the next election loss on real liberals who won't vote for the Clinton/Schumer/Pelosi party.

    Now the Hillary fan sites are filled with vitriol toward not only working class whites, but anyone who dares to say that those people are just as important as blacks and refugees.

    And the various “sexual minorities,” of course. Can’t forget them.

    Read More
    ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
Current Commenter says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS
PastClassics
The evidence is clear — but often ignored
The “war hero” candidate buried information about POWs left behind in Vietnam.
Talk TV sensationalists and axe-grinding ideologues have fallen for a myth of immigrant lawlessness.
The major media overlooked Communist spies and Madoff’s fraud. What are they missing today?