It seems such an obvious truth: In regione caecorum rex est luscus — “In the land of the blind the one-eyed man is king.” But the English writer H.G. Wells turned the proverb on its head in his short-story “The Country of the Blind” (1904), one of the cleverest and most profound ever written. Wells’ story describes a sighted mountaineer who, while climbing in the Andes, discovers a hidden valley where the inhabitants have been blind for generations.
Seeing is Sinful
Does the sighted mountaineer become king of the valley? Far from it. Socially speaking, his faculty of sight isn’t merely a disadvantage but a dangerous curse. The blind tribesfolk are not impressed by his claims to possess an additional and superior sense:
He spoke of the beauties of sight, of watching the mountains, of the sky and the sunrise, and they heard him with amused incredulity that presently became condemnatory. They told him there were indeed no mountains at all, but that the end of the rocks where the llamas grazed was indeed the end of the world; thence sprang a cavernous roof of the universe, from which the dew and the avalanches fell; and when he maintained stoutly the world had neither end nor roof such as they supposed, they said his thoughts were wicked. (“The Country of the Blind”)
It turns out that, in the land of the blind, the two-eyed man is a heretic. It would be even worse in a land where, for religious reasons, people merely pretended to be blind. Or rather: it is indeed worse in a land of pretended blindness. Britain is like that. So is the rest of the ethnically enriched West. It is heretical to comment on certain highly visible aspects of the world. Instead, we have to pretend that they’re not there and either remain silent or state the opposite of the truth.
“There is only one race — the human race!”
Britain is not a Utopia but a Pseudotopia — a Land of Lies. The biggest and foulest lies swirl in the vast sewer of what the left would call “racial discourse.” Here are a few of those lies:
- There is only one race — the human race.
- All races are equal in intellectual, moral and civilizational potential.
- Mass immigration from the Third World enriches the stale pale nations of the First World.
- Any White resistance to ethnic enrichment must be crushed before it leads to a Second Holocaust.
- When non-Whites fail, it can only be because of White racism.
These lies are reinforced constantly by every medium of official propaganda and public education, but sometimes the storm of mendacity rises to a hurricane. Britain has experienced one of those hurricanes in 2018. First, this year is the twenty-fifth anniversary of the martyrdom of our new patron saint, St Stephen Lawrence, the Black teenager who was murdered by a White gang in London in 1993. Second, the government is accused of mistreating members of the so-called Windrush Generation, that is, the saintly non-White immigrants who began arriving in Britain after the Second World War.
Never let reality intrude on ideology
The first ship to carry these immigrants was called the Empire Windrush. In the words of the dedicated virtue-signaller Jeremy Corbyn, the immigrants came here “to rebuild” the country. Corbyn’s words were echoed by Gary Younge, the Guardian’s chief Black intellectual, who said that the Windrush Generation “came here from the Commonwealth to rebuild Britain.” Not to help rebuild Britain, but to rebuild it all on their ownsome, despite being, in those distant days, a tiny fraction of the population. In other words, they were supermen and superwomen, armed with miraculous powers that made any one of them worth many thousands of mere British Whites. Or so Corbyn and Younge are pretending. After all, the left never let reality intrude on ideology.
And the reality, of course, was that the non-Whites of the “Windrush Generation” were of low average IQ and came from clannish, corrupt cultures with no history of economic success or intellectual achievement. They were not suited to life in an advanced technological society and the ordinary Whites of Britain objected loudly to their presence right from the beginning. Britain’s treacherous elite responded to these White objections by passing harsher and harsher laws against free speech and free association.
The so-called Labour party, which was founded to champion the White working-class, instead sided with the elite and the predatory capitalists who benefited from cheap labour. And Labour was proud of its treachery. Just look at Roy Hattersley, a former deputy leader of the party who served as MP for the working-class Whites of Sparkbrook in Birmingham. He has boasted that “For most of my 33 years in Westminster, I was able to resist Sparkbrook’s demands about the great issues of national policy — otherwise, my first decade would have been spent opposing all Commonwealth immigration and my last calling for withdrawal from the European Union.”
Britain is not a democracy
We can be certain that Hattersley joined loudly and enthusiastically in the chorus of execration that followed Enoch Powell’s so-called “Rivers of Blood” speech in 1968. Powell spoke up for ordinary British Whites, opposed mass immigration, and became the most popular politician in the country. But Britain isn’t a democracy and he was driven out of respectable society by the treacherous elite. Roy Hattersley summed up the attitude of the elite when he asked this rhetorical question: “Should I, in 1964, have called for what a clear majority of my constituents, and most of the country, undoubtedly wanted — the repatriation of all Commonwealth immigrants?” His answer: of course not. He did not want the majority to have any say in their nation’s future. But if Britain had been a democracy, there would have been no need for repatriation, because the non-White “Commonwealth immigrants” would never have arrived in the first place.
Unlike Britain, the East European nation of Hungary is a democracy. Its people have been given a chance to say whether or not they want to be enriched by non-White immigration. Their answer has been a decisive no: they have just voted overwhelmingly to re-elect their anti-migration prime minister Viktor Orbán, who has become the Enoch Powell de nos jours. He is a hate-figure for Europe’s xenophilic elite, who constantly ask: How can Orbán say that non-White and Muslim immigration would be bad for Hungary when Hungary has never experienced it? It’s an extremely stupid and disingenuous question. Orbán and millions of other Hungarians know that non-White immigration would be bad for their nation because they can see what it has done to Britain, France, Sweden and Germany. Unlike those enriched nations, Hungary does not suffer from suicide-bombing, rape-gangs, female genital mutilation and exotic Third-World diseases. If Hungary allowed mass immigration, it would certainly acquire those pathologies.
“Objective news about migration…”
To the left, it is deeply shameful that Orbán should oppose mass immigration by pointing at its bad effects on Western Europe. This an extract from one of the many anti-Orbán articles published by the Guardian:
“Hungarians are bombarded by fabricated news about migration and shameless xenophobic propaganda on a daily basis,” said Kornel Klopstein, who has helped set up what has become the Nyomtassteis movement, which prints its own newsletters containing information to counter the government propaganda. … “Bringing objective news about migration to people can help them to make better decisions in the upcoming elections,” said Klopstein. (‘Ghettos and no-go zones’: Hungary’s far right fuels migrant fears ahead of vote, The Guardian, 28th March 2018)
Kornel Klopstein does not agree with the Hungarian majority, so it’s interesting that he does not have a Hungarian name. Is he Jewish? The “poet and translator” George Szirtes is certainly Jewish and has attacked Orbán again and again in the Guardian. For example, he’s claimed that Hungary is on the verge of becoming a full-blown autocracy and that Orbán is “invoking every antisemitic trope in the book” in his criticisms of the pro-migration Jewish billionaire George Soros. Another Jewish writer, Gideon Rachman, wrote in the Financial Times that Orbán’s criticisms of Soros are “laden with anti-Semitic imagery.” It’s odd, then, that the Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu congratulated Orbán on his victory. Netanyaju does not support anti-Semitism.
And what does the SJW Kornel Klopstein mean by the phrase “objective news about migration”? I assume that he means the ludicrous propaganda peddled by SJWs in the West . For example, the Guardian has breathlessly reported that “German initiatives are equipping new arrivals with the skills to alleviate the country’s worker shortage.” Yes, an “Afghan cop” has become a “German nurse,” so we don’t need to worry that most new enrichers in Germany are unqualified or even illiterate and that White German taxpayers could be facing a bill of a trillion euros to cover welfare, housing and medical care for those enrichers.
Schwimmen Macht Frei
As I said: the left never let reality intrude on ideology. For another example, meet a German SJW called Günter Schütte. According to the Guardian, he has found a magic key to turning clannish, corrupt Third-Worlders into model citizens of an advanced First-World society. Herr Schütte is, in the Guardian’s entirely straight-faced words, “Germany’s first swimming instructor to specialise in helping to cure refugees’ fear of water.” The article continues:
[W]hen Schütte realised that many refugees who arrived in Wolfsburg were families from countries with little open water, and that many children had been traumatised by the journey across the Mediterranean, he decided that swimming could become a tool for better integration. … If Schütte thinks that swimming can help young asylum seekers find a path in the country they now call their home, it’s because he believes that water doesn’t just counteract the pull of gravity. The pool is meant to be a faith-free zone. “In my swimming course, religion has to go to the back of the queue,” he says over a plate of pasta with pumpkin ragout prepared by his wife. “We swim together, no matter what people believe in. That is something that is very important to me and that I am very frank about.” (How swimming lessons change the lives of refugee children, The Guardian, 21st April 2018)
Problem solved! This kind of idiocy has to be taken seriously in Pseudotopias like Britain and Germany. In Hungary, by contrast, politicians speak the truth about mass immigration and xenophilic Jews like George Szirtes and Gideon Rachman do not have a decisive influence on immigration policy. If Jews did have a decisive influence, Hungary would open its borders to the Third World and begin to suffer all the pathologies of non-White enrichment: mass murder, rape-gangs, dead cartoonists, honour killings, female genital mutilation, grope-festivals, in-breeding and exotic diseases.
Anti-Racism Kills Blacks
Hungary would also acquire two new state religions: Holocaustianity and minority worship, both of which are flourishing in the Pseudotopia of Britain. At the heart of minority worship here is the martyr-cult of our new patron saint, St Stephen Lawrence. He was the victim of a very rare crime: White-on-Black murder. Just as in the United States, most inter-racial violence in Britain, from murder to rape, is committed by non-Whites against Whites, despite non-Whites still being a minority of the population. The left is not interested in this statistical truth or the reality of anti-White predation and hatred that underlies it. Instead, the left is interested in power. The martyr-cult of Stephen Lawrence is admirably suited to advancing the power of the left.
But the martyr-cult is not at all suited to protecting ordinary Blacks from violent crime. In the United States, the self-righteous activists of Black Lives Matter have been responsible for thousands of unnecessary deaths:
We’ve been repeatedly assured over the last two years that there is no such thing as a Ferguson Effect, that Black Lives Matter couldn’t possibly be contributing to a higher homicide rate. We’ve also been assured that it’s all very complicated and it will take years to disentangle.
Also, the homicide spike isn’t at all national, it’s just in a few cities like Baltimore and Chicago. As I point out below, the latest Chicago surge in murders began in January 2016, immediately after or coinciding with four BLM-driven triumphs of liberalism over the Chicago Police Department from late November 2015 to early January 2016.
But Chicago is murky compared to Baltimore, where the current high rate of homicides can be dated to April 27, 2015, the day of the BLM riot over Freddie Gray’s death. This may be the single most clear-cut case in the history of social science. … (Well, There’s Your Problem Right There, Baltimore, Steve Sailer, 28th September 2017)
Something similar happened in Britain after the MacPherson Report, an enquiry into the death of Stephen Lawrence that described the Metropolitan police in London as “institutionally racist.” The police stepped back from policing Blacks and more Blacks were murdered as a result. Violent crime against Whites also rose and the MacPherson Report undoubtedly made the police even less willing to act against the non-White rape-gangs at work in places like Rotherham and Oxford. Furthermore, the Report, commissioned by the highly authoritarian New Labour government, allowed that government to abolish the “800-year-old” legal safeguard against double jeopardy, or repeated prosecution for the same crime.
Gerontophile rapists and triple-murderers
In short, the martyr-cult of Stephen Lawrence has been extremely bad for Britain. But any mainstream politician or journalist who dared to say so would be treated like Enoch Powell and driven out of respectable society. Instead, ordinary Whites are supposed to writhe in shame every time the mournful features of Doreen Lawrence, the martyr’s mother, appear in the British media. It’s a surreal situation, because Lady Lawrence, who was ennobled by the cuckservative David Cameron in 2013, came to Britain from the extremely violent and corrupt Black nation of Jamaica, where the police carry out “hundreds of illegal killings” every year, according to the impeccably liberal Amnesty International. Official propaganda insists that Black Jamaican immigrants have made a “massive contribution” to Britain.
And indeed they have: for example, they have committed a vastly disproportionate number of murders and rapes here. The gerontophile Delroy Easton Grant, who raped scores or even hundreds of elderly White women, came to Britain from Jamaica. So did Theodore Johnson, who performed the remarkable feat of murdering three of his female “partners.” So did the violent gang that used the rape of White women as an initiation rite. But those Jamaican over-achievers flash through the British media like meteors, briefly glimpsed and then gone for ever. Stephen Lawrence and his mother, by contrast, are permanent fixtures in the political firmament, blazing forth as symbols of Black victimhood and White villainy.
The Ruling Stones
But Doreen Lawrence isn’t very intelligent and didn’t become prominent by her own efforts. She is the leading figure in the martyr-cult, but she didn’t create the cult or ensure its permanency in British public life. Instead, just like the NAACP in the United States, the martyr-cult was a Jewish creation. Its guiding intellect was the cold and calculating Dr Richard Stone, a former head of the Jewish Council for Racial Equality and a dedicated advocate of the need for Jews and Muslims to unite, as “natural allies,” against their shared White Christian oppressors.
Alas, Dr Stone’s work to forge a Jewish-Muslim alliance has been far less successful than his work to promote the martyr-cult of Stephen Lawrence. Dr Stone has very effectively promoted the lie that Whites are an ominous and ever-present threat to the well-being of non-Whites. The truth is completely the opposite. Non-Whites are a massive threat to Whites, not vice versa. They are also a massive threat to each other. In the twenty-five years since Stephen Lawrence was martyred, thousands of Blacks have been murdered by other Blacks in Britain. In 2018, Blacks and other non-Whites form the vast majority of those both committing and falling victim to knife-murders and acid attacks in London.
“Yo blud, wot you mean?”
All of this is a direct result of mass immigration, as the journalist Mary Wakefield has admitted in the cuckservative Spectator:
In the [London] Evening Standard, Wayne, an ex-gangster from Plumstead, gave an interview in which he explained that the resettled kids from war zones had upped the ante in gangland. ‘In the last ten years, since the Somalis and the Congolese came to London, they taught us a whole new level of violence. These people had seen family members mutilated, so when they said, “I’m gonna smash you up”, us guys would be shouting, “Yo blud [i.e., blood-brother], wot you mean?” and they would just pull out a blade and juk [stab] you in the chest. It upped the speed and level for us British-born guys. We had to arm up to protect ourselves. It created an upward spiral.’
Not Amber Rudd, not Sadiq Khan nor Theresa May would ever speak publicly about this, for fear of seeming racist. But isn’t that in itself racist? It implies that the problem is somehow to do with skin colour, when any poor kid forced into a civil war might well be brutalised by it. We absolutely have a duty to offer asylum to children fleeing horrific circumstances, but we also have a duty to acknowledge the increased dangers the police face as a result. If we don’t, these multiply. (An odd new feeling has crept up on me — sympathy for the police, The Spectator, 21st April 2018)
Why do we “absolutely have a duty to offer asylum to children fleeing horrific circumstances”? In fact, we don’t have any such duty at all. To suggest otherwise is mawkish virtue-signalling that would have been dismissed with contempt not only by that great conservative hero Winston Churchill, but by all mainstream politicians well into the twentieth century. Somalia and the Congo are a very long way from Britain and the “children fleeing horrific circumstances” passed many safe places en route to this country. Now that they are here, they are reproducing the savage and barbarous culture of their homelands.
Virtue-signalling and vibrancy
Is that a surprise? Not to anyone with eyes in their head and brains between their ears. But in the Land of Lies, the wilfully blind are King. And I’m sure that the virtue-signalling Mary Wakefield and her family rarely, if ever, encounter that Somali and Congolese culture at first hand. They will live at a safe distance from the enriched areas of London, allowing the “absolute duty” of welcoming enrichers to fall on other people.
But let’s give the Spectator some credit: it also publishes the Islamophobe Douglas Murray, who has criticized Muslim immigration and even gone so far as to mention the Jewish role therein. He has recently asked a very important question: “Why do politicians refuse to tell it how it is on immigration?” Sadly, his answer was wholly inadequate. The subheading to his article ran: “It is the one issue where our leaders deny the wishes of their citizens.”
That’s like saying that food is the “one issue” where a dog-owner denies the wishes of his dog. If the dog wants food and doesn’t get it, then the owner proves that he is unfit to own a dog. He is failing to meet the dog’s most basic and important need. Similarly, if politicians “deny the wishes of their citizens” on immigration, they prove not only that they are unfit for office but that they are acting with conscious treachery. Immigration is not just “one issue” among many: it is, as Enoch Powell pointed out half-a-century ago, of vital, existential importance, altering a nation and its future in the most direct and intimate way.
Resisting the will of the people
Recall the Labour politician Roy Hattersley, who stood for parliament promising to serve the White working-class in the Birmingham constituency of Sparkbrook. Once elected, he chose to betray his constituents. Decades later, he openly boasted of his treachery in the Guardian: “I was able to resist Sparkbrook’s demands about the great issues of national policy — otherwise, my first decade would have been spent opposing all Commonwealth immigration.”
Hattersley called immigration a “great issue of national policy” because he knew it bore directly on the nation’s future. That was in the 1960s; today the future has arrived. Britain is an authoritarian surveillance state vibrant with the non-White pathologies of terrorism, rape-gangs, violent crime and political corruption. It is a Land of Lies where free speech is dying and the wilfully blind are King. Our new state religion of minority worship insists that Britain has been vastly enriched by mass immigration from violent, corrupt Third-World nations.
For example, where would the National Health Service (NHS) be without doctors and nurses from the Third World? Well, the NHS would be like the rest of Britain: far better off. Non-White doctors and nurses are far more likely to be corrupt and incompetent, particularly if they have acquired their qualifications in such hotbeds of cheating and fraud as India, Pakistan and Nigeria. Britain was the birthplace of modern medicine in the nineteenth century, when highly intelligent and competent Whites like Joseph Lister and Florence Nightingale began to reform a profession that had formerly done more harm than good to its patients. British medicine did not need non-Whites then and does not need them now. The NHS would be better off without them.
“Guilty until proved guilty”
But that is a truth that cannot be spoken. Minority worship is as rampant in the NHS as it is in parliament and at the BBC. White doctors may see that their non-White colleagues are incompetent or corrupt, but they must not act on the evidence of their lying eyes. If they do, they will share the fate of a White surgeon called Peter Duffy, who discovered that Whites who face allegations of racism in the NHS are “guilty until proved guilty”:
Consultant NHS surgeon voted Doctor of the Year ‘was forced to quit his job after three Asian colleagues branded him a racist when he raised concerns about their work’
A consultant NHS surgeon who was voted ‘Doctor of the Year’ was forced to quit his job after being branded a racist by three Asian colleagues, a tribunal heard. Peter Duffy, 56, alleges he was the subject of racism allegations from two Indian consultants Dr Kavinda Madhra and Dr Ashutosh Jain and Pakistani Dr Saleem Nassem.
Dr Duffy told a tribunal he reported one doctor for being unable to use an ultrasound machine, missing ‘several’ cancers and playing golf despite being asked to treat a patient with deadly sepsis. He also said he raised concerns over another he believed had bungled operations and been involved in overtime fraud. But the University Hospitals of Morecambe Bay NHS Trust consultant urologist claimed at a tribunal yesterday he was subjected to ‘malicious, toxic and utterly false’ allegations from the three men over his ‘whistleblowing’. …
In a statement given to the Manchester employment tribunal Mr Duffy who is being advised by the whistleblowing charity Public Concern at Work, said he had suffered from heart problems as a result of his treatment and now had ‘chronic’ post traumatic stress disorder. He claimed another senior colleague had stood down after claims of racism were also levelled against him and added: ‘I believe a clear and sustained campaign of victimisation, vilification and disinformation was aimed at me by the clinicians who were responsible for the clinical errors, avoidable deaths and excessive, probably fraudulent work that were the subject of the my repeated protected disclosures. …’
In his statement Mr Duffy added: ‘It is difficult to overstate the sheer toxicity of these utterly false allegations. I was warned in my first few months in the Trust that I must at all costs avoid an allegation of racism against me. I was told that such allegations, even if entirely unwarranted can destroy careers and that the NHS tended to regard racism allegations as “guilty until proven guilty”. Unfortunately, I was unable to defend myself during this particular meeting, being entirely unaware that I was under attack or that the meeting ever took place until I was unemployed.’ … (Consultant NHS surgeon voted Doctor of the Year ‘was forced to quit his job after three Asian colleagues branded him a racist when he raised concerns about their work’, The Daily Mail, 19th April 2018)
Mass immigration harms White nations not only by increasing crime of all kinds. It also destroys the competence, efficiency and harmony of White institutions, from the health service to the justice system. After all, why would incompetent doctors from an ethnic minority admit their own faults when they can make a highly effective accusation of racism instead? Minority worship means that non-Whites are automatically privileged over their supposed White oppressors. The former Chief Rabbi Jonathan Sacks has pointed out that Britain’s institutions have been “poisoned by the rise of identity politics, as minorities and aggrieved groups jockeyed first for rights, then for special treatment.” He even admitted that “the process … began with Jews, before being taken up by blacks, women and gays.”
A false accuser is honoured in Israel
But Rabbi Sacks has been contradicted by the verbose and self-righteous Jewish novelist Howard Jacobson, who has claimed that it would be “sacrilege” for Jews to make false or self-serving claims of anti-Semitism. I think that Jacobson is talking self-deluded nonsense. The Jewish mega-fraudster Robert Maxwell, born Ján Hyman Binyamin Hoch, made repeated accusations of anti-Semitism against those who accused him of fraud and malpractice. These accusations undoubtedly helped Maxwell-Hoch continue and extend his enormous financial crimes. And when he was exposed as one of the biggest fraudsters in history, did the Jewish community condemn his “sacrilege”? Not in the slightest. Maxwell still lies buried on the Mount of Olives in Israel, honoured for his work on behalf of the Jewish state. False accusations of anti-Semitism are very useful to Jews, just as false accusations of racism are very useful to non-Whites throughout the West.
That’s why we see so many hate-hoaxes in Pseudotopias like America, from false accusations of Islamophobia on the New York subway to false accusations of gang-rape at the University of Virginia. At least, sight-criminals like Steve Sailer see the hate-hoaxes. The mainstream media don’t. As Sailer points out, “hate-hoax” isn’t recognized by the mainstream media even as a concept, let alone a widespread reality. But Greg Cochran, another sight-criminal in America, is wrong to speak of “fools,” “barking-mad craziness” and “demented gate-keepers” when he criticizes those who insist on absolute racial equality and the Psychic Unity of Mankind.
Crypsis is not crazy
There is nothing crazy about cultural Marxism, which has steadily and remorselessly tightened its hold on the Western world since the end of the Second World War. As we can see from the careers of Stalin and Mao, denying reality can even be advantageous to ideologues. If you have reality on your side, you may be complacent about victory and feel inclined to be magnanimous to your opponents. If you don’t have reality on your side, you know that the key to victory is not truth but deceit, censorship and intimidation. Cochran condemns “the lies” of men like Stephen Jay Gould, Richard Lewontin and Ashley Montagu. But lying is a highly effective strategy in competition, as all biologists should be well-aware. Stick-insects are not really sticks and hornet clearwings are not really hornets.
Instead, they’re defenceless insects that have protected themselves for millions of years by lying to the eyes of hungry predators. Ashley Montagu followed a similar strategy of crypsis, or concealment of one’s true nature. His name — Montague Francis Ashley-Montagu in full — sounds like that of an Old Etonian dandy, heir to an ancient earldom and many acres of Scottish grouseland. That’s not the image conjured by his real name of Israel Ehrenberg. Like Gould and Lewontin, Montagu was Jewish. That’s not a coincidence: Jews have been the hardest-working and most effective promoters of Pseudotopia.
America would not be a Land of Lies without them. Nor would Britain, France, Germany and Sweden. If we want to save the West, then the Land of Lies must turn into the Land of Eyes. We must see racial reality and act on what we see.
Appendix: Martyr-Cults That Didn’t Make It
Liberals claim to be deeply concerned about racism, sexism and bullying. They are lying. In fact, they are deeply concerned about advancing their own power and feeding their own narcissism. That’s why the following victims of violent hate-crime have never prompted martyr-cults like the one that surrounds Stephen Lawrence.
- Lucy Lowe, 2000 — a sixteen-year-old English schoolgirl murdered with her mother and sister in an arson attack. The arsonist had been raping her since she was thirteen and had made her pregnant at fourteen. She was pregnant again to him at the time of her death, but feminists did not publicize her murder, there was no official enquiry, and no martyr-cult now surrounds her. Why so? Because Lucy Lowe was White and her murderer was a vibrant Pakistani Muslim. (More here)
- Kriss Donald, 2005 — a fifteen-year-old Scottish schoolboy abducted by racist thugs simply because of the colour of his skin. After hours of terror, he was repeatedly stabbed, soaked in gasoline, set on fire and left to die in agony. The racist thugs had been emboldened by police inaction against their previous crimes, but anti-racists did not publicize the murder, there was no official enquiry, and no martyr-cult now surrounds him. Why so? Because Kriss Donald was White and his murderers were vibrant Pakistani Muslims. (More here)
- Kimberly Fuller, 2005 — a nineteen-year-old English girl who was pinched on the buttocks in a nightclub. When she objected to this assault, she was stabbed in the neck by the man responsible and bled to death. Feminists did not publicize her murder, there was no official enquiry, and no martyr-cult now surrounds her. Why so? Because Kimberly Fuller was White and her murderer was a vibrant Pakistani Muslim. (More here)
- Laura Wilson, 2010 — a seventeen-year-old English girl who, with the full knowledge of the authorities in her home-town of Rotherham, had been “groomed” for sex from the age of twelve by violent misogynists. After her abusers tired of her, she was repeatedly stabbed and thrown into a canal to die. Feminists did not publicize her murder, there was no official enquiry, and no martyr-cult now surrounds her. Why so? Because Laura Wilson was White and her murderers were two vibrant Pakistani Muslims. (More here)
- Valaree Megan Schwab, 2018 — a sixteen-year-old American schoolgirl who was subject to repeated bullying by a bigoted gang who didn’t like her taste in music. When she tried to stand up to the gang outside a food-shop in New Jersey, she was stabbed twice in the torso with a steak knife and died later in hospital. Anti-bullying activists are not publicizing the murder and we can be confident that there will be no official enquiry and that no martyr-cult will ever surround her. Why so? Because Valaree Megan Schwab was White and her murderer is Black, like the rest of the gang that bullied her. (More here)