The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 Tom Sunic Archive
How to Become an Anti-Semite?
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

Critical or laudatory writings about Jews seem to be an inexhaustible subject although it often turns into a repetitive rant. Over the last two thousand years tons of books and articles have been published either praising Jewish soul-improvers and their apostate apostles to the heavens, or describing their early Judaic brethren as the scum of the earth. Along with each historical surge in Jewish influence, there follows, as can be witnessed anew in the USA today, the inevitable upsurge in antisemitism – whatever this word means, or whomever this generic label with many meanings may apply to. Any objective account about Jews is a coincidentia oppositorum, or simply put, a conceptual tension resulting from the co-existence of two conditions which are opposite to each other, yet dependent on each other and presupposing each other. Objectively speaking every book and every remark in favor or against Jews depend on the self-avowed objectivity of a cited author. Carl Schmitt, a prominent German conservative legal scholar, now a household name for the Alt-Right and New Right in Europe and the US, shortly after the National-Socialist takeover, wrote in a chief German legal journal of that time:

The necessary task of bibliography is very difficult given that it is undoubtedly necessary that we determine as accurately as possible who is a Jew and who is not.[1]Carl Schmitt. „Die deutsche Rechtwissenschaft im Kampf gegen den jüdischen Geist“, Deutsche Juristen-Zeitung (München und Berlin: C.H Beck’sche Verlagsbuchhandlunog; vol.20/41, 1936), p.1194.

However, the most important thing, coming to light these days, is the clear and definite understanding that Jewish opinions cannot be put on the same level in their intellectual content with the opinions of German or other non-Jewish authors.[2]Ibid, p. 1196.
(Carl Schmitt. „Die deutsche Rechtwissenschaft im Kampf gegen den jüdischen Geist“, Deutsche Juristen-Zeitung (München und Berlin: C.H Beck’sche Verlagsbuchhandlunog; vol.20/41, 1936), p.1194.)

In order to prevent any critical inquiry into the Jewish question, carried out by numerous German anthropologists, biologists, psychiatrists and legal scholars in Weimar Germany and later on in National-Socialist Germany (see here) many Jewish and many left-leaning authors, immediately after the end of WWII, began to inundate the educational and political markets with demonizing treaties not only about “ugly Nazis,” but also about the forever lurking White Gentile threat. One of the harshest critics of antisemitism, quite in line with the re-educational ukases of his coreligionists and coethnics of the newly reestablished Frankfurt School, wrote : “Judeophobia is a psychic aberration. As a psychic aberration it is hereditary, and as a disease transmitted for two thousand years it is incurable.[3]Rudolph M. Loewenstein, Christians and Jews; A Psychoanalytic Study (NY: International Universities Press, Inc., 1951), p. 15. The prime purpose of the newly launched academic field of psychoanalysis, which later gave birth to critical race theory, and later on to a bizarre “French Theory” curriculum, was to pathologize Whites into perpetual feelings of guilt. It spread in the 1950’s like a wild fire, particularly in American colleges. Soon, the entire social science curriculum in the West turned into courses of demonology with labels such as “antisemite” and “Nazi” becoming the symbols of Absolute Evil. It follows that is impossible to converse with Absolute Evil. With humans labeled as extraterrestrial monsters or subterranean demons, one cannot negotiate; legal provisions of human rights cannot apply to species declared as non-humans beforehand. They need to be destroyed. Such a Manichean view, based on criminalization of the adversary, soon became the foundation of US foreign policy with its latest offshoot now being observed in the US demonizing attitude toward its former WWII Russian ally. Soviet-Russian soldiers, after their liberation of Auschwitz in January 27, 1945, were crucial in cementing the post-WWII liberal and communist antifascist narrative; today, by contrast, their Russian offspring must be excluded from the protections of international law.

Many Jews are well aware that works critical of their behavior, and especially works published by German scholars prior and during WWII, were not all, and not always, products of aberrant minds. Some of those works contain unsettling truths about Jews. Hence the reason that the first step initiated by the Allies in ravaged Europe, following WWII, was to destroy or make inaccessible thousands of books deemed to be dangerous to the establishment of the post-WWII world order.[4]Liste der auszusondernden Literatur (Berlin: Zentralverlag, 1946). (see also here).

Early French communist and antifascist author Jean Paul Sartre, was among the first to provide the script for demonizing political adversaries, based more on his personal vendetta than on his true concern for French Jewry. As the German troops were preparing their retreat from France in the late summer of 1944, he drafted a short book in which he commiserated with the French Jewry, comparing their plight to the hero in the Franz Kafka’s novel The Trial, who knows that he is considered guilty; judgment is continually put off — for a week, two weeks[5]Jean Paul Sartre , Antisemite and Jew, trans. Georg J. Becker (1948 NY: Schocken books, 1976). p.63 . Very likely Sartre rushed to publish this little Judeophile manifesto of his in order to better adjust himself to the spirt of the vindictive antifascist times in Europe, but also to distract his audience from the fact that in the early 1930’s he benefited from the scholarship in a nascent National-Socialist Germany. The pro-German Vichy government in France, from 1940–44, had never bothered him, leaving the performance of his dramas unscathed. This did not prevent Sartre, however, by the end of 1944, along with a bunch of his communist fellow travelers, and with the little help of American occupying powers, to launch a large-scale operation of intellectual inquisition against thousands of French anticommunist authors, artists and wrong-thinkers — the process to be known decades later in America under the name of cancel culture:

Of all professional categories, journalists and writers were hit the hardest. This underlines the ideological character of the conflict and the ensuing purges. The proportion of writers and journalists who were shot, imprisoned, and barred from their profession surpasses all other professional categories. Do we need to be reminded of the assassination of Albert Clément, Philippe Henriot, Robert Denoël, of the suicide of Drieu La Rochelle, of the death of Paul Allard in prison prior to court hearings and of the executions of Georges Suarez, Robert Brasillach, Jean Luchaire […] [or] the death sentence pronounced in absentia or a commuted prison sentence for Lucien Rebatet, Pierre-Antoine Cousteau, etc.?”[6]Dominique Venner, Histoire de la Collaboration (Paris: Pygmalion, 200p), p. 515-516.

If one agrees for a minute that antisemitism is indeed a form of mental disorder necessitating the banishment of all antisemitic authors from the public domain, or having them dispatched to psychiatric wards, then one must just as well conclude that hundreds of books critical of Jews, from antiquity to modernity, also need a similar treatment in retrospect: from Tacitus to Treitschke, from Dickens to Dostoyevsky from Voltaire to Vacher de Lapouge. The alphabetical list of authors who have made critical remarks about Jews goes off to infinity.

ORDER IT NOW

The degree of antisemitism is difficult to gauge, only confirming time and again that this word has an extensive capacity for diverse meanings. There are latent antisemites who limit themselves to mild criticism of Israel in the hopes of avoiding public rebuke, and there are also those who use explicit and often gross words for the portrayal of Jews. There is a huge difference in antisemitic syntax between the well-mannered Catholic writer Hilaire Belloc and the folkish writer Louis Ferdinand Céline, who, other than writing his antisemitic pamphlets (still banned in France), is considered the best French novelist of the twentieth century. Belloc, by contrast, prefers pussyfooting around the Jewish question, using convoluted sentences devoid of hyperbolic Jew-baiting words, always watching nervously not to cross the line, while putting it diplomatically:

It has unfortunately now become a habit for so many generations, that it has almost passed into an instinct throughout the Jewish body, to rely upon the weapon of secrecy. Secret societies, a language kept as far as possible secret, the use of false names in order to hide secret movements, secret relations between various parts of the Jewish body…[7]Hilaire Belloc, The Jews (London: Constable & Company, Ltd, 1922), p. 100.

Céline, by contrast, seems to be focused in his lengthy unhinged antisemitic prose way too often on Jewish anal tracts and Jewish genitals. In his peculiar lingo, often difficult to translate even into the crassest American slang, he notes:

The fucked up Masonic Republic, supposedly French is at the mercy of secret societies and Jewish Banks (Rothschild, Lazare, Barush etc…) it’s in agony.[8]Louis Ferdinand Céline , School for Corpses, transl. Szandoer Kuragin (First published in French in 1938). https://schoolforcorpses.wordpress.com/

Or even more:

The Kikes that rule the Universe, they understand them, those secrets of public opinion. Hidden in the corners, they have all of the wires in their hands. Propaganda, gold, advertising, radio, press, the cinema. From Hollywood the Jewess, to Moscow the Yid, same boutique, same telephone, same agencies, same Kikes manning the lookout, the cash drawer, the business affairs.[9]L.F. Céline, Trifles for a Massacre, by Translator Anonymous (AAARGH, Publishing House, Internet, 2006), p. 37. (First published in French, 1937). https://aaargh.vho.org/fran/livres6/CELINEtrif.pdf

Rare are contemporary academics who would dare tackle critically, studiously, yet dispassionately, the most explosive taboo topic of our times: the Jewish question. For his groundbreaking work on Jews and their role in shaping academic and public discourse in the US Kevin MacDonald was bound to receive a kiss of death from his fellow American academics. The entire political communication after WWII throughout the West has been based on fake Gentile Judeophile mimicry on the one hand, and hidden Gentile resentment of the Jews on the other. A French author writing under pseudonym notes:

From 1945 onwards, there is no longer any Jewish question, antisemitism ceasing to be an opinion and becoming a criminal offence instead; it’s rare to find those daring to defy this taboo.[10]Henry Boulade, “Petit inventaire de l’antisémitisme”, in Écrits de Paris, n° 656 (July 2003), pp. 29-37.

Modern German politicians are a case in point. Over the last several decades the have not even pretended to engage in a make-believe Judeophile mimicry; their veneration of Jews is hyperreal, if not surreal, with the existence of the state of Israeli serving as Germany’s stated raison d’état. Every new German chancellor, when sworn in, forces himself/herself to embark on multiple pilgrimages to Tel Aviv where he or she states unambiguously, as the former Chancellor Angela Merkel did on several occasions, that “ Israel’s right to exist is the Germany’s reason of state”.[11]Thorsten Schmitz, „Das neue Israel“, Süddeutsche Zeitung, May 17, 2010.

Jews as Gentile Doppelgangers

Atonement rituals of US and European politicians vis-á-vis Jews can be compared to faked citizenship behavior in the former communist Eastern Europe where critical comments about the communist ruling class could only be made in private and behind bolted doors. In a similar vein, the Jewish question today is critically discussed in America and Europe only in closely-knit circles of like-minded people. However much the so-called Western democracies like to brag on all frequencies about free speech and free academic inquiry, any critical comment about Jews must stay off limits. With any tiny critical remark on Jews, if uttered in public, either deadly silence sets in, or all hell breaks loose in the media. Censorship in communist states was surely well described by some sharp American observers; self-censorship, by contrast, which reigns supreme in academic and governmental circles in America and the EU, hasn’t as of today been critically examined.

Surely, the System, along with its friendly scribes is overjoyed when observing the proliferation of diverse antisemitic sects and multiple “White Power” or “Hollywood Nazi” cults, or internet Jew-baiters. There are two reasons for that: Firstly, self-declared Jew-haters are always welcome by the System given that they provide the System with necessary legal fodder further bolstering its worn-out mantra that “Western democracies extend free speech to all — even to their enemies.” And secondly, any hostile insult against Jews always comes in handy to the System’s thought police which can easily set up decoys and charge antisemitic suspects with having a master plan for a terrorist act against the Jews.

Another parallel is in order. Former communist apparatchiks in Eastern Europe used Marxist dialectics very adeptly. In the beginning of their bloody reign, dialectics was a tool to justify the physical destruction of their anticommunist critics. After the breakup of communism, they resorted to the same dialectics in order to rebrand themselves as Western liberals and exorcise themselves from accusations of having committed gigantic crimes in their recent communist past. Likewise, many Jewish scholars resort to similar dialectical invocations about “rising tide of anti-Semitism,” which serves them as a tool for further strengthening the national and racial identity of millions of Jews and lining the coffers of Jewish organizations. One could raise a rhetorical question: how long would Jewish identity thrive without generating its antithesis in the Absolute Evil incarnated nowadays in the so-called White Supremacist and his fellow traveler, the Antisemite? If one assumes that all antisemites in America and Europe simply vanished into thin air, the System would likely resuscitate and reconstruct a new brand of antisemites out of the blue. Just like the System in the ex-communist Soviet Union and Eastern Europe drew its negative legitimacy by constantly reinventing the boogeyman of counterrevolutionary Fascism and Nazism, so do many Jewish agencies and pro-Jewish lobbies in the US, along with countless left-leaning social science professors, build their identity, or better yet shield their tenure, by nurturing their evil household darling Hitler and by evoking the danger of his postmodern sidekicks, the proverbial “White Supremacist” and the “Neo-Nazi.”

In passing it must be stated over and over again that the pejorative word “Nazism”, although not legally banned in private communications, was never used officially in even one document in National-Socialist Germany. The term “Nazi” was first coined by early Spartacists, i.e., early German Moscow-steered Bolsheviks in Weimar Germany, later to be used massively in the Soviet Union, before it comfortably settled during the 1950s in American academic and media vernacular. Its derogatory equivalent would be “commie” for a communist, although not a single academic paper in the US or EU would accept a paper where a word “commie” is used as a synonym for a communist. In addition, the compound noun National-Socialism includes the noun ‘Socialism’, written with a capital S, a word which had a very good reputation among all nationalists all over German-friendly countries in Europe, prior and during WWII: from Germany to Spain, from Croatia to Finland.[12]Nikica Mihaljević, Ustaški put u socijalizam : U teoriji i praksi NDH : Zbirka rasprava i članaka nikad objavljenih poslije 1945. (Zagreb: Nakladnik: Naklada Pavičić, 2016). Soviets and their latter-day modern Western offspring, the antifas, also like to adorn themselves with the word “socialism” yet cannot tolerate that the “Nazis” could also be socialists. The two-syllable word “Nazi” sounds more demonic, hence more acceptable in the mainstream media.

In a similar vein, mainly due to the willful ignorance of the German language and German cultural history many modern self-proclaimed experts on National-Socialism refer to it as an “ideology.” Again, not a single National-Socialist government document, not a single academic paper in in Germany, from 1933-45 used the term Ideologie; the official name being Germany’s National-Socialist “Weltanschauung” (worldview). However, neither does the English word “worldview” reflect best the German word “Anschauung”, a word which has a nuanced philosophical meaning, carrying a notion of perception, imagination, figurative thinking, or pictorial apprehension. (see here)

One could also reverse the antisemitic Anschauung and pose another rhetorical question regarding the wishful thinking about the tentative disappearance of Jewish influence in the West. If Jews were suddenly to depart, as many White Christian antisemites secretly yearn – there would still remain countless of millions of US evangelicals, Christian-Zionists, millions of White traditional Catholics in Europe, all hoping in chorus to become themselves verus Israel, i.e., more Jewish than the Jews and thus await their turn for chosenness. Hating or loving Jews and Judaism, yet quoting every Sunday their scripts and bowing down to their jealous god Yahweh, is surely a form if not of the White paranoid mind, then at least a serious form of White Gentile split identity.

Credo quia Absurdum (“I believe because it is absurd”)Credo quia Absurdum (“I believe because it is absurd”)
Credo quia Absurdum (“I believe because it is absurd”)

Penile and anal analogies that many antisemites often resort to when describing the Jews were also trademarks of the chief Jewish psychoanalyst, Sigmund Freud. His obsession with Oedipus complex projected on his would-be incestuous and parricide gentile clients reflected very likely his own concealed sexual disorders. Nonetheless Freud deserves big credit when describing Christian antisemitism as a hidden “neurosis” in his best and last book Moses and Monotheism.[13]Sigmund Freud, transl. by K. Jones, Moses and Monotheism (London: Published by the Hogarth Press and the Institute of Psychoanalysis, 1939), p.148.

The hatred for Judaism is at bottom hatred for Christianity, and it is not surprising that in the German National-Socialist revolution this close connection of the two monotheistic religions finds such clear expression in the hostile treatment of both.

It is no accident that the intellectual and cultural foundations of Fascism and National-Socialism can be traced to central Europe and northern Italy known historically for their strong Catholic traditions yet retaining strong pagan undercurrents which the Vatican willy-nilly had to put up with over centuries, at least until the Second Vatican Council in 1962–65. Many German scholars in the footsteps of Friedrich Nietzsche and sympathetic to early National Socialism wrote hundreds of articles and books linking Judeo-Christianity to the rise of early Bolshevism. “The Jewry, in its single-minded pursuit of the world domination through the Bolshevik deception of mankind, has had its strongest ally in the disruptive Biblical faith.[14]Hans Hauptmann, Bolschewismus in der Bibel (A. Klein Verlag, Archiv Edition 1937), p.117-118.

On the other hand it is also no accident that in WASP America Jews have had a far better proliferating turf than in Europe, while continuing to thrive with their overreaching zeal, especially in framing the modern American social-juridical narrative. As I wrote some time ago many Jewish scholars (J. Auerbach, M. Konvitz, J.L. Talmon) rightly acknowledged deep theological links between the American idea and Judaism. Many American traditional conservatives and White Nationalists may be correct in denouncing secular myths, such as Freudianism, Marxism and neo-liberalism, which they see as ideologies doctored up by Jewish and pro-Jewish writers and politicians. They fail, however, to go a step further and examine the Judaic origins of Christianity and the proximity of these two monotheist religions. Or to put it into a more up to date verbiage: How can one dismiss the self-evident Holocaust story yet at the same time embrace the self-evident story of the Jew Jesus Christ or the immaculate conception of the Jewess Virgin Mary?[15]T. Sunic, preface by K.MacDonald, Homo americanus; Child of the Postmodern Age (London; Arktos media, 2018), p. 120 and passim.

Putting all Jews in one basket is also a serious error given that some of them have shown strong antisemitic feelings themselves, such as the so-called “self-hating” Jews. These Jewish antisemites have simply grouped together Jewish apostates who have critically addressed the Jewish monotheist mindset in all its religious or secular modalities. Arthur Trebitsch, Otto Weininger, Gilad Atzmon, let alone the modern Holocaust revisionist scholar, Gerard Menuhin, are just some of the Jewish names that are wisely avoided in social science studies, both in US and EU colleges today. Long ago a left-leaning French Jew Bernard Lazar, after publishing his classic, came under fire from both the left and the right for his criticism of his coethnicists:

The general causes of antisemitism have always resided in Israel itself, and not in those who antagonized it. This does not mean that justice was always on the side of Israel’s persecutors, or that they did not indulge in all the extremes born of hatred; it is merely asserted that the Jews were themselves, in part, at least, the cause of their own ills.[16]Bernard Lazare, Antisemitism, Its History and Causes (New York; The International Library Publishing Co., 1903) p. 8.

It would be a waste of time trying to debate endlessly about the looks of Jesus Christ. Was his phenotype similar to that of Turco-Khazarian Bob Dylan, or to that of the Sephardic-Maghrebian Enrico Macias? Was he the son of God, or a son of a prostitute and her Gentile partner? The discussion about his heavenly or his racial origin will likely continue for another millennium. The true believer, however, always knows the right answer. Jesus certainly didn’t carry the facial features of a blond-haired Nordic superhero that we observe on crucifixes of all churches from Manila, Mexico or Munich, nor did he look like Jim Caviezel. Moreover, his historicity has been hotly and violently debated for over two thousand years by Christians and non-Christians alike. During the early Roman Empire his name was never mentioned anywhere in the works of Roman historians, except for the fact that the Roman high society and the educated Romans, until the beginning of second century AD considered Jews (Iudeai) and Christians (Chrestianos) as the one and the same sect. Therefore, the expression “Judeo-Christian” is by no means an oxymoron or a deliberate verbal corruption of a single religious denomination. Early evangelists were not Europeans; all early Christian scribes and missionaries were almost all of north African and Levantine origins, including Tertullian, Cyprian, Augustin, Origen. In his latest and thickest book, containing over one thousand pages and several thousand quotes from various often conflicting sources, Alain de Benoist writes:

In fact, Jesus never polemicized against Judaism, but rather within it. He never wanted to create a new religion, nor to establish a “Church”. At the most, he wanted to reform from within the Judean religion, this being his only objective.[17]Alain de Benoist, L’Homme qui n’avait pas de père (Paris: Krisis, 2021), p. 44.

Neither has the Church, over the last decades, lagged behind in its Judeophile statements despite its own serious legacy of persecutions of Jews throughout history. One cannot forever deny one’s own founding myths.

On November 17, 1980, in Mainz, Pope John Paul II spoke of “the people of God of the Old Covenant who have never been revoked by God.” In June 2006, Benedict XVI recalled in his turn the “inseparable relationship which binds Christianity to the Jewish religion as to its eternally living and valid matrix”.[18]Ibid., p. 55.
(Alain de Benoist, L’Homme qui n’avait pas de père (Paris: Krisis, 2021), p. 44.)

De Benoist writes further:

In other words, at its very beginning, Judeo-Christianity was not a form of Christianity, but rather a form of Judaism. This is the reason why, rather than speaking of Judeo-Christianity, it would be far better to speak of Christian Judaism.[19]Ibid., p. 873.
(Alain de Benoist, L’Homme qui n’avait pas de père (Paris: Krisis, 2021), p. 44.)

But at some point, twin brothers must seek for a divorce and violent wars — which became much later a mutual trademark of all Christians beliefs during the early and late medieval period in Europe. But first the Jewish founding father had to be removed.

The break-up between the “Jews” and the “Christians” was therefore part of a much longer process than previously thought, since it was only in the fourth century that the two systems definitively separated from each other. This was a decisive turning point, given that at this time, in 325 AD, the Council of Nicaea was held, and thereafter, in 380 AD, Christianity was declared by Theodosius the state religion.[20]Ibid., p. 933.
(Alain de Benoist, L’Homme qui n’avait pas de père (Paris: Krisis, 2021), p. 44.)

However awful this may ring in the ears of many devout modern Christian anticommunists and many White Nationalists, Christ may qualify as an early paleo-Bolshevik of Antiquity and his apostles dubbed as early crypto-commissars. Christians and communists, after the lengthy process of secularization throughout the period of the Enlightenment did, however, turn into mortal enemies in the first half of the twentieth century. This was to be expected as both the Communist and the Christian preachers had vied differently for the salvation of their sheep. Their underlying, allegedly pacifying dogma, has remained however the same despite the usage of different signifiers respectively: multiracialism, multiculturalism, ecumenism, i.e., communism and globalism. Next to modern-day Antifa rabble rousers and various Jewish agencies, the US Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB), along with the German Bischofskonferenz (DBK) is today the most vocal spokesman for non-White migrations to the West, known by now under the name of the Great Replacement.

Notes:

[1] Carl Schmitt. „Die deutsche Rechtwissenschaft im Kampf gegen den jüdischen Geist“, Deutsche Juristen-Zeitung (München und Berlin: C.H Beck’sche Verlagsbuchhandlunog; vol.20/41, 1936), p.1194.

[2] Ibid, p. 1196.

[3] Rudolph M. Loewenstein, Christians and Jews; A Psychoanalytic Study (NY: International Universities Press, Inc., 1951), p. 15.

[4] Liste der auszusondernden Literatur (Berlin: Zentralverlag, 1946).

[5] Jean Paul Sartre , Antisemite and Jew, trans. Georg J. Becker (1948 NY: Schocken books, 1976). p.63

[6] Dominique Venner, Histoire de la Collaboration (Paris: Pygmalion, 200p), p. 515-516.

[7] Hilaire Belloc, The Jews (London: Constable & Company, Ltd, 1922), p. 100.

[8] Louis Ferdinand Céline , School for Corpses, transl. Szandoer Kuragin (First published in French in 1938). https://schoolforcorpses.wordpress.com/

[9] L.F. Céline, Trifles for a Massacre, by Translator Anonymous (AAARGH, Publishing House, Internet, 2006), p. 37. (First published in French, 1937). https://aaargh.vho.org/fran/livres6/CELINEtrif.pdf

[10] Henry Boulade, “Petit inventaire de l’antisémitisme”, in Écrits de Paris, n° 656 (July 2003), pp. 29-37.

[11] Thorsten Schmitz, „Das neue Israel“, Süddeutsche Zeitung, May 17, 2010.

[12] Nikica Mihaljević, Ustaški put u socijalizam : U teoriji i praksi NDH : Zbirka rasprava i članaka nikad objavljenih poslije 1945. (Zagreb: Nakladnik: Naklada Pavičić, 2016).

[13] Sigmund Freud, transl. by K. Jones, Moses and Monotheism (London: Published by the Hogarth Press and the Institute of Psychoanalysis, 1939), p.148.

[14] Hans Hauptmann, Bolschewismus in der Bibel (A. Klein Verlag, Archiv Edition 1937), p.117-118.

[15] T. Sunic, preface by K.MacDonald, Homo americanus; Child of the Postmodern Age (London; Arktos media, 2018), p. 120 and passim.

[16] Bernard Lazare, Antisemitism, Its History and Causes (New York; The International Library Publishing Co., 1903) p. 8.

[17] Alain de Benoist, L’Homme qui n’avait pas de père (Paris: Krisis, 2021), p. 44.

[18] Ibid., p. 55.

[19] Ibid., p. 873.

[20] Ibid., p. 933.

(Republished from The Occidental Observer by permission of author or representative)
 
Hide 173 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. of course: the fundamental Jewishness of Christianity

    is why today’s (White) Christians are so susceptible to

    Terminal Jewification.

    Muslims and Asians remain almost immune.

  2. The thing is to become a Anti-Supremite.

    Supremite: Supremacist Semite.

    Anti-Supremitism: Against Supremacist Semites.

    We need to stop calling them ‘neocons’. Call them ‘supremites’.

    And instead of ‘Great Replacement’, better to say ‘White Nakba’.

    • Replies: @Carolyn Yeager
  3. Jim H says:

    ‘Roman high society and the educated Romans, until the beginning of second century AD considered Jews (Iudeai) and Christians (Chrestianos) as the one and the same sect. Therefore, the expression “Judeo-Christian” is by no means an oxymoron.’ — Tom Sunic

    So Romans, most of whom had scant interest in, or knowledge about either sect, should be our arbiters of how “Judeo-Christian” is to be interpreted 1,900 years later?

    This is remarkably silly, particularly as Sunic goes on to acknowledge that the definitive break-up between Jews and Christians occurred in the fourth century. Why then would we appeal to spottily informed first-century Romans to define Jews and Christians as one and the same?

    ‘How can one dismiss the self-evident Holocaust story yet at the same time embrace the self-evident story of the Jew Jesus Christ or the immaculate conception of the Jewess Virgin Mary?’ — Tom Sunic

    Uhhh … whut?? Unless Sunic intends ‘self-evident’ to drip with irony (which is not apparent), this statement is a bizarre non sequitur. Both the Holocaust and the immaculate conception are anything but self-evident, requiring faith to accept assertions that are not buttressed by unassailable facts.

    Sunic offers some useful insights on pre- and post-WW II Europe. But his logic and syntax are erratic at best, and in some cases outright defective.

    • Replies: @Badger Down
    , @xyzxy
  4. Were the Jews ever persecuted? They say so, but always, it seems, with huge exaggeration. The Cossack rebellion, the Nazi concentration camps during pandemic. The First Crusade, a few rogues with grievances. Did any of it come close to what the so-called Jews are doing today to the real Semites in Palestine?

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
    , @JR Foley
  5. Anonimous says:

    It never happened and they then demanded reparations. What role does ‘anti-semitism’ play in that recognition?

  6. Chris Moore says: • Website
    @Haxo Angmark

    of course: the fundamental Jewishness of Christianity is why today’s (White) Christians are so susceptible to Terminal Jewification.

    Today’s White “Christians” are susceptible to ((Jewification)) because they’re Golem, as are all ((Jew)) emulating wannabes. ((Christianity)) has been re-written and redefined by the ((Jews)) and their stooges (that would be you and Sunic and millions of others) into something it’s not ‐‐ the offspring of ((Jews)).

    But it was always an anti-Synagogue of Satan honor code that provided instruction on how not to be a Satanist/evil, soulless creature. As were Moses’ Ten Commandments.

    The ((Jews)) and their stooges subscribe to neither.

    When someone is a ((Jew)) or adopts ((Jewish)) ways, the protections and obligations of the Ten Commandments no longer apply to them. They’re “beyond the pale” and deserve whatever happens to them, or whatever the nest of vipers or Synagogue of Satan does to them, including jabbing them to death for profit.

    • Replies: @anarchyst
  7. One needed corrective (of a number): Chrestiani are not the same as Christiani. The former term refers to a western Latin-speaking religion, probably originally of a priest of Isis named Chrestus, which means “the golden one.” It is not the equivalent of the myth of the Jewish Christos from the Greek-speaking east; that term is the literal Greek translation of the Hebrew word messiah and is unrelated to the Latin sound-alike. An early surviving manuscript of Suetonius, in the chapter detailing the punishments of the convicted arsonists of the great fire of Rome, clearly shows the later Christian alteration of the “e” in the term into an “i”. Those unfortunates were bound in animal skins before being set afire, which were deliberately insulting cruelties, as the Isis tradition revered fire and animals, refusing even to wear clothing made of wool or leather. A century and a half later, both the cults of Jesus and Isis, and many others, were welcomed at the court of the emperor Septimius Severus and his family.

    • Replies: @Badger Down
    , @j2
  8. anarchyst says:

    Here is how to become an “anti-semite”…
    “Multiculturalism and diversity for thee but not for me” is the jewish mantra. THAT is a major source of white gentile dissatisfaction with jews.
    To this day, jews operate entire communities that flout civil-rights laws, prohibit gentiles from owning property or opening businesses in these communities, and go so far as to prohibit gentiles from attending the “public schools”. Of course, (((they))) have no compunction about collecting welfare benefits above and beyond what us mere gentile taxpayers pay into the “system”. Look up Kiryas Joel, for one example.
    Gullible whites may have been involved in the “civil-rights (for everyone but whites)” movement but “the elephant in the room” is the jews who really spearheaded the “movement”.
    I came of age during the first so-called “civil-rights” movement and observed for myself the underhanded dealings, the demonization of decent, law-abiding gentile whites, and in general, the deterioration of civil society.
    Almost all of the “civil-rights” workers and demonstration “handlers” were of one persuasion–New York based leftist communist jews. They cared not one wit about true “civil rights”, but were there to create hate and discontent among their black charges (who were too stupid or naive to see that they were being used to suborn and destroy legitimate government and society–a favorite communist tactic).
    These New York-based “carpetbaggers” fomented their hate and discontent, only to become future “civil-rights” attorneys, race-hustlers, and America-hating leftist communists…and CORE, SNCC and \$PLC being invented. Let’s not forget the ADL which was formed to protect a jew rapist murderer, Leo Frank.
    Those of us whites who were in the middle of this “civil-rights” revolution had a saying: “Behind every negro, there is a jew”. No truer words were ever spoken.
    Let’s not forget jewish infestation of the nation’s education and entertainment systems, (which continues to the present day), in which they can spread their jewish supremacist poison.
    The so-called “non-violent civil-rights demonstrations” were anything but “non-violent”. Robberies, rapes, and other criminal acts committed by jewish civil-rights handlers and their black “pets” were common, but never reported, as even the “mainstream media” of the day was “in on the game” and conveniently turned off their cameras during the acts of violence. You see, even then,”creating crises” was a part of the agenda.
    The “beginning of the end” of America was the use of federal troops against white Americans, which, in itself was a violation of “posse comitatus”–the prohibition of the use of federal troops for domestic law enforcement purposes.
    President Eisenhower, being of jewish extraction showed his visceral hatred of white gentiles by using federal troops to suppress constitutionally protected dissent. As most whites were (and still are) law-abiding, they (we) were “steamrollered” by the use of federal troops to crush our (white) honest dissent. We never recovered from those unconstitutional actions. It was all downhill from there…
    Not only that, Eisenhower’s “dirty secret” (jewish revenge) was the true “holocaust” committed against German troops after the cessation of WW2. Eisenhower’s Rheinwiesenlager “death camps” were truly that, compared to the German “work camps” that were purposely mislabeled as “death camps” for propaganda purposes. Eisenhower declared the inmates to be “disarmed enemy combatants” and NOT “prisoners of war, thereby denying them basic human rights and Geneva Convention protections, such as food and shelter. These unfortunate captives were tortured and starved to death. Eisenhower was a “paper-pusher”, NOT a true leader like George S. Patton who did decry the treatment of Germany after WW2 (and had to be murdered to keep him from speaking out).
    It is curious to note that most jews are NOT “semites” at all, but are eastern European sixth-century converts to judaism. Palestinians are TRUE semites…
    These are major reasons why (some) jews are hated.

    • Thanks: Hitch, mark green
    • Replies: @Pure Coincidence
    , @anon
  9. anarchyst says:
    @Chris Moore

    We also have to get away from the “judeo-Christian” mindset, as well…
    Using the “Old Testament” for “laws” is wrong. Yes, the Ten Commandments may be a good guide which proscribes certain behaviors, but the rest of mosaic law relies on a vindictive, vengeful “god” to exact “punishment” on “his people”.
    That my work fine for jews, as they have their supremacist “Talmud” to rely on, but “for the rest of us”, it won’t wash.
    Judaism is an insular belief system that shuns outsiders, prohibits proselytization, and promotes a form of supremacy, relegating all gentiles (non-jews) to the status of livestock-subhumans with souls, only to be used for the advancement and benefit of jews.
    In fact, slavery (of goyim) is still condoned and encouraged in the jewish Talmud. In addition, the jewish Talmud condones pedophilia, allowing lecherous old jews to rape children as long as they are “three years and a day” of age.
    The barbaric practice of circumcision (male genital mutilation) is also suspect, the mohel fellating the infant after the “deed is done” passing on (who knows what) STDs to the infant. Sick…
    In fact, every jewish “holiday” (holy day) is based on the celebration of genocide and destruction of gentiles.
    Our present troubles are a result of a jewish cabal taking over political decisions in our nominally “multicultural” country.
    Tying Judaism to Christianity was a clever trick used by the jews to “cement” their claim to the “land of Israel” and of the covenant, to which I reply, “God is not a real estate agent”.
    Jews rejected the covenant when they murdered Jesus Christ. Their covenant with (their) God was then “null and void”.
    It is the flawed Schofield translation of the Bible that elevated jews to the status of Christianity’s “elder brothers”, which was then reinforced by the Catholic (flawed) “coup” “Vatican II Ecumenical Council” in the 1960s.
    I cringe when I hear well-meaning people talk about out judeo-Christian heritage.
    Nothing could be further from the truth.
    The god of judaism is a vengeful god, totally unlike the merciful and welcoming God of Christianity.
    Christianity welcomes ALL, regardless of nationality or social status, not true of judaism.
    Jews DID murder Jesus Christ and TOOK FULL RESPONSIBILITY FOR DOING SO.
    Sad to say, even the present-day (post-Vatican II ecumenical council) Catholic church has bought into absolving the jews for Jesus Christ’s murder.
    As is the case, even today, the jews got others, the Romans to do their dirty work for them, the crucifixion of Jesus Christ.
    How can Christians have the same values as the Jews; the very people who denounced and betrayed the founder of Christianity, Jesus Christ, and call for his execution (by others, of course, that is the Jewish way)?
    It makes absolutely no sense at all.
    Jews have no respect for Christianity, for Jesus Christ or Mary, his mother, who are both honored as Prophets in Islam, but instead, Jews spit on hearing their names and do the same while passing a Christian of any kind or a Christian Church in Israel. They have no respect for Christians or any other religion.
    It is time the Jewish lobbies and the American Government leaders as well as the evangelical Christian leaders who mislead the poor American young into joining the military and believing that they are doing something for God and Christianity by fighting Israel’s wars were named, shamed and arrested and tried for treason.
    In a perverse sort of way, israel’s favorite “war song” is “Onward Christian Soldiers”
    There…I’ve said it…

  10. Smear of ‘antisemitism’ is premised on the notion that we must unconditionally love Jews.

    So, it doesn’t matter if you have perfectly sound reasons for disliking, fearing, or hating Jewish power, attitudes, behavior, etc.

    Jews can do whatever they like, but it’s always YOUR fault if you are appalled by Jewish behavior or agenda.

    It also applies to blacks as ‘racism’ usually means not having a properly reverential attitude toward blacks. And of course homos get special protection with ‘homophobia’. (There are terms like ‘Islamophobia and ‘Russophobia’ but they have no traction as the Jewish-run media hardly mention them, and if anything, encourage anti-Russian and anti-Iranian feelings.)

    Jews say it’s wrong to stereotype Jews, but Jews routinely stereotype goyim, Christians, Arabs, Muslims, Russians, Germans, and etc. Jews say it’s wrong to blame all Jews for what some Jews do, but somehow all Germans must atone forever for WWII(and all whites to blame for ‘slavery’).

    I agree, no one should believe every Jew is like George Soros, but who can deny that much of Jewish Power is Sorosian and the Jewish community, by and large, has been supportive of his global policies?

    • Agree: mark green
    • Replies: @Chris Moore
    , @mocissepvis
  11. Anti-semite is an oxymoron, considering most Jews are Ashkenazim, from Khazaria (now called Ukraine…who woulda thunk it?), and thus (so sayeth the Book of Genesis), since Ashkenazim are descended from Ashkenaz, son of Gomer, grandson of Japheth….not Shem, Japheth! Therefore, most Jews aren’t even Semitic! (But many Palestinians are…so sayeth Eran ElHaik, Israeli geneticist, and Schlomo Sand, Israeli Historian…and let’s not forget Arthur Koestler, author of “The Thirteenth Tribe,” a Jew who wrote based on facts that Ashkenazim are from the old Khazar Empire, and whose king was called Kagan….how many Jews have that last name? Robert Kagan for one, husband to Victoria Nuland–who got the Maidan crapola going in Ukraine in 2014, which has led to…you know.) And since Jewish settlers in Israel want to kill off all Palestinians…. So, who is being “anti-semitic”?

    • Replies: @mocissepvis
  12. Semitism is Jewish hatred of anyone who is not Jewish. If you’re against that, you are antisemitic already.

    • Agree: mocissepvis
  13. bert33 says:

    I got to visit israel once and it was a cool experience, got to soak up some history, visit jerusalem, that kind of thing. Masada was neat. It was awful damn hot though. The people were nice enough but the salespeople were kinda pushy. Nobody had a pro-semite/antisemite attitude, they were real folks. Maybe the people on the web could learn a thing or two by actually going there and talking to the people that live there and have to put up with all the B.S. Blessed be one and all and dont hold the sins of the father over the son’s head. A little bit of reason and forgiveness go a long way

  14. The truth is is that no one really knows much about the real Jesus, if there was a real Jesus. My take on it is, supposing that Jesus was real, he was trying to turn Judaism into something more like Buddhism, with an emphasis on karma and the “life to come”, meaning that Jesus believed that some future version of you would reap the seeds of whatever you did in this life. If the Gospels are any guide, Jesus believed that Judaism could be interpreted this way without any repudiation of its original scriptures. I think he was wrong about that, as in really and truly wrong.

    The original follower’s of Jesus were at the fringes of Jewish society and liked hearing the new radical re-interpretation, but the people at the centre of Jewish society considered it heresy, thus the disciples were booted from Jerusalem and fled to other parts of the Roman empire where they began to recruit Gentile followers. Soon after this time, Christianity became something very negative. It was essentially a hippy movement lead by Rome-hating Jewish radicals.

    Then the church began to tell lies about its having prophetic knowledge unknown to the rest of the world. It claimed the world would end soonish, but the votaries would be “saved”. This made the votaries feel special and inspired their loyalty in spite of its being based on a lie. The lie spread through the ranks of the dissafected and then started to permeate all segments of Roman society, in particular women and slaves.

    After the church had grown in strength, there was a power struggle between Jews and Gentiles in the hierachy and the Gentiles won. The parallell with this is Stalin’s takeover of the Communist party in the Soviet Union.

    At this point, the church, became less evil than it was, even though it remained a force for evil, leading efforts to erase organic native European culture and replacing it with dead artifice.

    Eventually the reformation happened, and the church began to re-Judaify. Now it has become little more than Noahide religion. The way its going not only will the old Testament not be repudiated by Christians, but the New Testament will be.

  15. @Jim H

    If you search for evidence of the holocaust of the six million Jews, you will soon dismiss that holocaust, because there is no evidence. The stories don’t match, some of them are impossible, the chemistry doesn’t work, the logistics are unbelievable, the maths is fake, and the number is missing from the Weasel’s arm. But go ahead, search for the murder of 6,000,000 by Germans. You won’t find it.
    Believing in Jesus, thinking Jews did 911, suspecting Jacob Rubenstein’s gang perped the JFK murder, approving of CRISPR, preferring horses to dogs: none of that has anything to do with das holocaust. I guess “self evident” doesn’t need real evidence. “I knew it didn’t happen, but in my mind it did.”

    • Agree: Carolyn Yeager
    • Replies: @anarchyst
  16. @Observator

    I think I’ll go with Chrustus.

  17. IronForge says:

    Don’t bring “Jesus” into this….

    https://www.jesusneverexisted.com/

    https://jesusbirthermovement.tumblr.com/post/51446102697/the-official-jesus-challenge-of-the-jesus-birther

    The Jesus Religious Cults have been debunked. Be Free – you’re not Existentially/Spiritually/Morally Obligated to Entertain Jewish Worldviews, Communities, or Narratives. Affiliate with Jewish Individuals based on your OWN Conscience.
    ******

    An “Anti-Semite” is a Non-Tribal who doesn’t agree with nor adheres to the Tribal Narratives of History and GeoPolitics.

    Tall Fences make for Good Neighbors, Tall Border Fences make for Good Neighboring Nation-States…

  18. Anonymous[387] • Disclaimer says:

    Author shows an egregious lack of scholarship while still asserting points, the mark of confirmation bias to points he prior held for irrational reasons and does not therefore care to seriously challenge.

    First: There were neither Jews nor Judaism (whichever you mean by that) during the time of Christ. There were instead Judahites descended from the tribe, and Judaeans who lived in the land pertaining to said tribe, who included Levites, Benjamites, and some Gentiles. There were instead Pharisees and Saducees, no Judaism — which term would have been considered a blasphemous attribution of the divine to a human.

    Second: There were no Jews at all until sometime in the 1700s. The term didn’t exist prior, and came into being as a pejorative or slang term, Jieu, that referred to a group of people with no relation to Judah in any regard.
    -2a: Faithful Judahites/Levites/Benjamites were either in Jerusalem for passover in 70AD, or so elderly, or ill as to be considered unable to attend their religious duties — the line of combined blood and faith, other than that of Judaean Christians, was there exterminated to the last by the Roman Empire.
    -2b: The Ashkenazim, AKA the “Ashkenazi Jews” are descended from neither Judeans nor Judahites/Benjamites/Levites. They’re the descendants of Askenaz, a descendant of Japheth, and they never lived in Israel or Judea prior to the 1900s. The descent for the Sephardics is mostly the same, just different geographic migration.
    -2b21: This also means they aren’t even S(h)emites, meaning you can’t be “Anti-Semitic” to them in reality, unlike they are being to what are called Palestinians who actually are descendants of Shem.

    Third: The codifications of the modern “Judaisms” are actually younger than Christianity, by between 300-1200 years, depending on which Talmud. It is argued that much of the collected materials are from the Judaean sources, however much of it is observably adapted Babylonian mysticism and scholarly interpretations instead, and the scholarly(read: rabbinic)interpretations are considered more important and authoritative than the original material, in direct contradiction to anything I’m aware of in any form of Christianity.

    So, stop spewing bullshit and do your research, and FFS check the authors of the material you’re reading, the defining characteristic of these people is their love of redefining themselves, truth and meaning be damned. Once you’ve done a bit of that, MAYBE you’ll be able to contribute to the real fight instead of functioning as yet another layer of idiotic smoke screen for your oppressors.

    • Thanks: Sisifo
  19. Most “antisemitism” is in fact counter-semitism: fighting back against their anti-White actions.

    • Agree: Kolya Krassotkin
  20. (…) the willful ignorance of the German language and German cultural history

    reading and commenting in English (US), Dutch (Flemish), Italian, French and German outlets, I regret to say that the said ignorance is universal, even in Germany itself (the majority of commenters doesn’t master the language properly, and is of an abyssal historic/cultural ignorance) .

  21. meamjojo says:

    So what was the the conclusion of this too long diatribe, most of which I skipped reading?

    • Replies: @Thatch
  22. @Haxo Angmark

    Terminal Jewification.

    Muslims and Asians remain almost immune.

    Actually, I’m not so sure. Islam, like Christianity, is one of the three great( i.e., the word”great” used in this sense to mean popular and significant) Semitic, monotheistic religions, which has theological roots in Judaism ( Abraham is the same prophet in Islam, Ibrahim, that he is in Judaism).
    That said, many of the current sectarian blood feuds that have erupted in the Middle East as a result of the neoconservative (i.e., Jewish Zionist) military campaigns against Israel’s adversarial Arab regimes have greatly served to further weaken pan-Arabian solidarity and political resolve to oppose the not-so-slow motion genocide of the Palestinians, as well as to isolate and demonize (in preparation for military assault) Iran, the mostly ethnic Persian, Shiite Muslim nation that has been the largest political and logistical supporter and facilitator for the two militias in the region that pose a real military threat to the genocidal, Jewish kleptocratic occupation government in Palestine ( i.e., Hamas and Hezbollah). The Arab League, which was once united in denying diplomatic recognition of the Jewish gangsters in Jerusalem, has now been splintered, with the UAE, Egypt ,Morocco and Jordan all signing treaties with the kikes in Israel. Several other collaborationist, US-Zionist puppet regimes in the region, including the world’s largest gas station known popularly as Saudi Arabia, could soon follow suit. It is very plausible that many if not all of those Arab puppet governments could join a military coalition led by the United States, and including Israeli military units, in a “preemptive ” attack on Tehran, just as the Arab League joined the US led military coalition against fellow Arab League member Iraq, in order to cripple the overtly anti- Israel government and military forces of the then Iraqi President Saddam Hussein, leader of the Iraqi branch of the Pan-Arab nationalist Ba’ath party, in 1991.

    The United States based, Jewish controlled mass entertainment and news media is global in nature, and as such , it is staunchly opposed to any threat to the political hegemony of United States government, which is determined by Jewish controlled mass media influence on public opinion. Nationalism ,both in Europe as well as in the Asian mainland and Pacific Rim, is a threat to United States hegemony, particularly the meteoric economic and military/naval rise of the People’s Republic of China.
    You can expect the neoconservative foreign policy of the United States to become ever increasingly belligerent and bellicose in order to attempt to hinder the growing military prowess that Beijing is actively projecting in the Westen Pacific region( notably in the food fish and natural gas/petroleum rich East and South China Seas). However, unlike Iraq, Syria, Afghanistan, Libya, Somalia or a number of smaller nations wrecked by US military forces, any military or naval clash with Beijing could very well end up giving the Jews and their ass puppets in the White House and the US Congress a thermonuclear bloody nose. Like the Russian Federation, the People’s Republic of China has assiduously invested in hypersonic missile technology, with a sizable inventory of these missiles, with both nuclear as well as conventional payloads. Beijing , again like the Russian Federation, also has a potent, ICBM capability that can accurately and swiftly hit targets within the continental United States.
    That’s a reality that ought to sober up the alcoholic ,Speaker of the House Pelosi ,the next time she is out cruising the shit stained and drug paraphernalia strewn streets of San Francisco, riding past the seemingly endless, metastasizing homeless encampments of dispossessed and destitute Americans, who could have benefitted from even a fraction of the \$3.8 billion USD in American tax dollars of free money given to Israel (a wealthy nation,btw) every year by the US Treasury, no questions asked.

    Amfreeparty.org

    https://www.amnesty.org/en/documents/mde15/017/2000/en/

    https://www.nytimes.com/1998/01/11/world/contraband-women-a-special-report-traffickers-new-cargo-naive-slavic-women.html

    Councilforthenationalinterest.org

    Ifamericansknew.org



    Video Link

  23. Franz says:

    Most people of Jewish or Christian birth and upbringing question very little of either and might not be capable of doing so. Something has to HURT before you question it when it’s installed before the age of reason.

    Otherwise it’s just a facet of your life, like being left-handed or bald/not bald. It’s just there.

  24. j2 says:
    @Observator

    “One needed corrective (of a number): Chrestiani are not the same as Christiani. The former term refers to a western Latin-speaking religion, probably originally of a priest of Isis named Chrestus, which means “the golden one.””

    No, Chrestos was not a priest of Isis. He was Jewish, which is evident from Suetonius: “because the Jews of Rome were indulging in constant riots at the instigation of Chrestus (impulsore Chresto) he expelled them from the city”. Notice, not Chrestus, but Chresto/ Chrestos.

    Josephus Flavius calls Herod Agrippa I with the name chrestos (gentle) and it may very well be that Herod Agrippa I did instigate Roman Jews in the time of Claudius and Herod was planning on declaring himself as the Messiah (see Acts, Herod dressed in shiny armor and was called not a man, then he died eaten by worms). Jesus was the prophet Messiah and Herod was the planned king Messiah, but Herod died and the uprising came only 66 AD when the comet appeared. So, Sutenius talks of Christians, but not those Christians that we mean. Jews were preparing for a takeover and a war against Rome.

  25. You know, it was only after the advent of the internet that I realised that names like Schwartz, Gold, Epstein or Spielberg were Jewish.

    Once I realised that, I couldn’t help noticing how often names like these came up in anything to do with American media and the film industry.

    This is not to attack Jews, just to state a fact.

    • Replies: @Sarita
  26. Anti-semitism is simply the label applied to anyone caught in the act of asking inconvenient questions or holding verboten thoughts.

  27. Zumbuddi says:

    Early evangelists were not Europeans; all early Christian scribes and missionaries were almost all of north African and Levantine origins, including Tertullian, Cyprian, Augustin, Origen.

    Richard Cook informed an uncritical Kevin Barrett and his equally credulous listeners that
    — Jews are Europeans;
    (Cook further hints that Jews were plunked in the Levant against their will;)

    we have to look at the historical roots and be honest about it: And again, I have tremendous respect for israel, for the jewish people, I have jewish blood in my own family. But the Jewish people are Europeans. They’re Europeans racially; they’re Europeans by culture; and to expect them to be the sole bastion of European culture on that tiny little rock and desert in the eastern mediterranean — it was too much to ask, I believe, in the beginning. It just has not worked. The Jewish people, including the ones who came from the Russian steppes as well as the ones who came out of Spain made a TREMENDOUS contribution to European culture over recent centuries. . . up until the last years of the nineteenth century and the first years of the twentieth century, almost all of the jewish people living in Europe had the intent to stay in Europe and to assimilate, to continue to assimilate in the European cultures, as they had done so successfully in england. As they’ve done in the United States. As they did, in fact, in Germany. , , , they have never been able to establish a peaceful nation that utilizes the best qualities of their intellect, of their spirituality; their tremendous accomplishments in science and medicine and religion.

    https://www.unz.com/audio/kbarrett_richard-cook-on-neocons-francis-boyle-on-resisting-medical-tyranny/

    You heard it on Unz so it must be true: Jews are Europeans, “racially, culturally.”

  28. How to Become an Anti-Semite?

    Simple. Work in a business dominated by Jews.

    • Agree: Carolyn Yeager
  29. “Where there is no Anti Semitism, there are no Jews.” Theodor Herzl

  30. Z-man says:

    Good point on the guilt factor and education. The rest, too long to read.

  31. Dr. Doom says:

    This phony “anti-semitism” racket is just the neurotic Zion Pig lashing out.
    This phony “anti-semitism” is just the Hatred of these fake Jews for Truth.

    Truly, the Truth will end up killing )))them((( and their mad delusions.
    The Zion Pig is just a pawn of Satan. An expendable asset.

    Only a few of the fake Christians actually say Judeo-Christian.
    Ye shall know them by their fruits and by their actions.

    [MORE]

    Its a whorehouse, this Zion Pig Occupation. Only whores feel at home.
    The bought and paid for have given up their souls already.

    Such a low price is paid for such a truly immortal treasure.
    But then fools are aplenty, while wise men are few.

    This is why “democracy” can never truly work out well.
    Only Satan’s pawns talk up “democracy”.

    Wear the “anti-semitic” label with Pride. You are among the blessed.
    The Zion Pigs will lose it all soon. The whirlwind swirls that will destroy )))them(((.

    In the echo chambers of the Ziomedia you can hear fear from the shills.
    More and more people realize the Zion Pigs to be a Suicide Cult of Death.

    The Zion Pigs are not made to win and rule. They are expendable assets in The Game.
    Eventually, the Endgame will be Ethnocentrism and Segregation.

    The Plan was always The Holy Roman Empire. The Zion Pigs just lay the foundation.
    White Men have LEARNED Sociology 101. In Group Solidarity is the Only Prosperity.

    Unlike Zion Pigs and their would be slaves, White Men can LEARN.
    That’s why I like them. They have POTENTIAL. Western Civilization is a Good Thing.

    Everything else is just razzle dazzle baloney. The Big Lie is the Post WWII hegemony.
    The New World Order shall be The Holy Roman Empire. That was always The Plan.

    The Zion Pigs always LOSE eventually. They cannot create or manage anything.
    These Cancerous Ghetto People must be driven out and left to die out.

    No more Out Group “charity”. No more “assimilation” or “multiracialism”.
    The White Man must clean out His house. Remove and destroy the parasites.

    The Corporation always gets what We want. We make The Rules.
    As Above. So Below. The motto of The Corporation. We are Legion.

  32. Hitch says:

    Of all professional categories, journalists and writers were hit the hardest. This underlines the ideological character of the conflict and the ensuing purges. The proportion of writers and journalists who were shot, imprisoned, and barred from their profession surpasses all other professional categories. Do we need to be reminded of the assassination of Albert Clément, Philippe Henriot, Robert Denoël, of the suicide of Drieu La Rochelle, of the death of Paul Allard in prison prior to court hearings and of the executions of Georges Suarez, Robert Brasillach, Jean Luchaire […] [or] the death sentence pronounced in absentia or a commuted prison sentence for Lucien Rebatet, Pierre-Antoine Cousteau, etc.?”[6]

    My impression of post war France was always one of French “Nationalists” taking revenge against “Collaborators”. One always thinks of the photographs of shaved headed women who had taken on German boyfriends. I was also aware that the ((Maquis)) and the French “Resistance” had been terrorizing the French countryside and German troops throughout the war, and I was aware of how abysmally Petain was treated after “liberation”, but this quote above leaves the impression that there was a complete purge of French society of anyone who the Jews hated. The orgy of hate released after WWII in France was in reality an orgy of Jewish Vengeance. Now I can see that since Jews are Nationalists only in the sense of their own choseness, that clearly these purges were not about French taking revenge on other French who had collaborated with Germany, but were in reality purges by Jews and their French puppets against the Nationalist French.

    The Dreyfuss affair illustrates the power that Jews had achieved over French society already before WWI. With this knowledge it becomes clear that it was Napoleon who had unleashed the Jews of France and those in Germany, and across central Europe. 1848 was the first attempt by the Jews to start their world internationalist revolution. WWI was the first world war of goy genocide, and WWII the second.

    Ukraine marks the threshold of the third world war of goy genocide. The “Great Reset” and “Build Back Better” is the reality of a Judaic implementation a global Morgentau plan against the goyim, and Germany is the vanguard of this self-immolation with France biting at her heals.

    • Replies: @Carroll price
  33. @Ann Nonny Mouse

    Don’t you count being kicked out of a country as persecution? It is often asserted by antisemites that it happened dozens, if not hundreds of times – usually when asking why, if there is nothing wrong with Jews, did they get expelled so often.

  34. @anarchyst

    Where can one get a reliably accurate, non bowdlerised copy of the Talmud[s]? I.e. one with all the nasty stuff in but not faked.

  35. @bert33

    That’s sensible though you are unlikely to get to know a representative sample of Israelis if you just go on the kind of visit that it sounds as though you (and I) did. I went with a tour leader whose attitude was indicated by his saying “I don’t call them settjements. I call them Israeli towns”. Still we met a Bedouin mayor who didn’t recognise the state of Israel as legitimate.

    • Replies: @mulga mumblebrain
  36. “Judeophobia is a psychic aberration. As a psychic aberration it is hereditary, and as a disease transmitted for two thousand years it is incurable.” I guess it is like homosexuality that is a psychic aberration(until politics recently changed it to being the desired normal) . So it is hereditary and there must be a “gay” gene. . Homosexuality can be called a mental disorder, Chinese court of appeals, rules . The ruling, from the Suqian Intermediate People’s Court, upholds a lower court’s ruling. It described homosexuality among “common psychosexual disorders,” and stated same-sex relationships are “believed to be a disruption of love or perversion of the other partner.”
    Since a disproportionately higher percentage of the Hebrew tribe practice this “psychosexual disorder”, this explains some of our country’s dislike of the PRC.

  37. xyzxy says:
    @Jim H

    Unless Sunic intends ‘self-evident’ to drip with irony…

    Whenever an intelligent person writes something obviously unintelligent, or otherwise out of line, I think you have to presume that they are attempting irony, or in another context possibly making an attempt at being facetious. Of course the best irony is necessarily subtle, and thus often open to misinterpretation by casual readers.

    Sunic’s attempt at irony falls flat because it is neither subtle, nor really helpful for making his point.

    Catholic doctrine has never been presented as self-evident, but rather as a mystery requiring church interpretation. Protestantism is more along the lines of individual scriptural self-interpretation, but that came later, and in any case inherited the standard Catholic dogma which it had to deal with, often abandoning.

    Anent the Holocaust(TM) there is, likewise, nothing that fits any self-evidency. In fact, its lack of evidence argues totally against anything like that.

    One could, as has been done, argue that the ‘conception mystery’ is not an historical event, but rather an instance of sacred symbolism, meant to uncover a deeper metaphysical truth. The Jewish story would not fit into this category, because it is necessarily taken to be an actual historical event. To consider it allegorical would deprive the story of intended meaning, and its usefulness to Jews.

  38. anarchyst says:
    @Badger Down

    From an engineering and logistical standpoint, NONE of the claims made by holocaust™ “survivors” and promoters is possible.
    –Killing jews with “bug spray” (Zyklon B) is not only impossible, but is laughable on its face.
    –Transporting jews to “camps”, utilizing scarce energy sources, transportation and logistical difficulties only to kill them is not only problematic but impossible as well.
    –Tattooing camp inmates only to kill them is also problematic.
    –If the “camps” were truly “death camps” why would medical facilities, recreational facilities, brothels, movie theaters, and other amenities be needed?
    –“Gas chambers” with non-sealed wooden doors and the lack of ventilation systems for such facilities, once again, disproves the claims made by holocaust™ promoters. Doors that “swing the wrong way” would make retrieval of the bodies impossible. Ordinary light fixtures, rather than explosion proof lighting fixtures are claimed to have been the norm.
    –Claims by holocaust™ promoters that gassed bodies were blue or green (rather than bright red) from poisoning are totally false.
    –Claims that the inmates could tell when jews were being cremated by the color of smoke emitted from the crematoria chimneys are patently foolish and false.
    –Let’s not forget “lampshades, wallets, soap and shrunken heads” made from jews is also laughable,
    –Crematoria running 24 hours a day, without “downtime” for maintenance on the muffles and flames “visible out of the crematoria stacks” are also impossibilities. Crematoria are designed to burn “clean” with no visible smoke and definitely no flames outside the stacks would be possible. Not only that, the claims that thousands of bodies were cremated daily are a statistical impossibility as it takes approximately 1.5 hours to cremate a human body. If cremation were used on “6 million” jews, the cremation process would have been operating into the 1950s.
    –The lack of depositories for bodies and ashes is more proof that the “camps” were not “death camps” but rather “work camps” for the German war effort.
    –Anne Frank’s “diary” partially written with a ball-point pen which was not invented till the 1950s. Time travel, anyone? lol
    Germans were (and still are) excellent engineers and would not have engineered the grievous errors that are claimed by holocaust promoters.
    Follow the shekels…

    • Agree: Kolya Krassotkin, sulu
  39. anarchyst says:

    Monika Schaefer, Sylvia Stolz, Ursula Haverbeck are but three women who have been incarcerated for questioning aspects of the so-called jewish “holocaust™”.
    You see, the jewish “holocaust™” (holocaustianity) has been turned into a “religion, in which no investigation or dissension is permitted, “under penalty of law” in many countries.
    The “kangaroo courts” that prosecute those who dare to seek TRUTH about this event utilize a concept called “judicial notice”. For those who are uninformed about this practice, “judicial notice” disallows any evidence that goes against the “commonly accepted beliefs”, EVEN IF THE “COMMONLY ACCEPTED BELIEFS” CAN BE PROVEN TO BE FALSE.
    Judicial notice is a dangerous concept, as it is quite often used to make sure that the courts get a conviction. If a defendant cannot introduce evidence on his own behalf, true “justice” is impossible.
    The jewish “holocaust™” is burning itself out, as more and more people are realizing that it is truly the biggest “hoax of the 20th century”.
    Censorship and incarceration for independent “thought” is the last grasp for the holohoax crowd. They don’t want to see their “cash cow” end.
    Add to that, the jewish “freak shows” called “holocaust™” museums which are taxpayer-funded in most countries, their sole purpose to “keep the dream alive”. Chutzpah, indeed.
    The holocaust promoters are at it again, claiming that memories of the “holocaust™” can be transferred to children, grandchildren, and even unrelated individuals (jews only).
    They want to keep the reparations racket going. What better way than to declare that the descendants of “holocaust™” victims are “holocaust™” victims as well?
    It has been shown that approximately 40% of all jews suffer from some degree of schizophrenia or other mental illness, possibly from “male genital mutilation” where the “mohel” fellates the infant, passing whatever STDs the “mohel” possesses….put such people in power, and you have the situation that we live under today.

    • Replies: @Zumbuddi
  40. Accused of anti-Semitism? Take it as a compliment, even as a badge of honor. In fact, do more of the same to generate more of it.

    • Agree: Z-man
  41. Bedford says:

    So long as you continue to conflate the terms Jew and Israelite you will continue to go in circles, chasing your conceptual tails. As here.

  42. “The Dangers of Victimhood by Jordan Peterson”

  43. DaveE says:
    @anarchyst

    This comment is worthy of its own heading and is better than the piece commented on. Many thanks!

    Maybe you could add a “chapter” or two about the creator of “Judeo-Christianity”, the so-called “apostle” Saul (eh, Paul) who was clearly a Jewish Cartoon Character invented to negate Jesus’ anti-Rabbi (then called “Pharisees”) truth-teachings and get back to the supremacist, racist, revengeful, lustful, ritualistic and self- praising premises of “the Torah”. Paul’s “epistles” were a literary castration of unpleasant truth spoken by Christ, but phrased with “feel good” words too subtle and disguised for most readers to notice the goalposts being moved.

    Anyway, thanks again.

  44. @bert33

    I guess all of us who’ve had a decent tourist experience in Washington D.C. at some point in our lives should give Congress another chance.

    • LOL: Biff
  45. Chris Moore says: • Website
    @Priss Factor

    Jews say it’s wrong to stereotype Jews, but Jews routinely stereotype goyim, Christians, Arabs, Muslims, Russians, Germans, and etc. Jews say it’s wrong to blame all Jews for what some Jews do, but somehow all Germans must atone forever for WWII(and all whites to blame for ‘slavery’).

    The irony is that it is ((Jews)) who are responsible for the transatlantic slave trade (in keeping with their slavemaster ethics).
    https://nationalvanguard.org/2016/04/jews-and-slavery-three-books-by-the-nation-of-islam/

    Per usual, they’ve re-written history, scapegoated all Whites for Zionist sins (when it was Anglo White elites who were in bed with them on the slave trade) and now portray themselves as civil rights heroes.

    This is a pattern that repeats itself over and over, wherby the ((Jews)) and their partners in crime project their own atrocities onto those they intend to knock off. And unbelievably, the goyim are so stupid, they let them get away with it. Or they’re so corrupt (they did the Judas deed with the Zionists) they have to hold their tongues.

    One sees this all the time: Slavery, Bolshivism/Communism, WW2, the Holocaust, 9/11, the War on Terror and “Islamofascism”, now the Covid scam… and the implicated Judas class grows larger with each new atrocity, and stays silent or castigates critics or would-be whistleblowers as “anti-Semites”, less their alliance with evil is revealed.

    This is how the soulless expose themselves ‐‐ their willingness and even eagerness to sell out to the soulless, evil ((Jews)) for thirty pieces of silver.

    • Replies: @Realist
  46. Not all Christians are/were philo-Semites. “The Jews and Their Lies.”

    As for how to become an anti-Semite, just watch the news. The Jews do what every they do right out in the open.

  47. Anonymous[370] • Disclaimer says:

    Antisemitism is nothing more than the hatred of the Arabs, then, why is everyone focused on the Khazarians?

  48. @anarchyst

    The God of the Old Testament IS the God of the new Testament. Him laying out punishments on the demon-worshipping kikes doesn’t negate this.

    You are a heretic worse than the goofiest amerimutt hick. Stop.

    • Disagree: Robert Dolan
    • Replies: @Robert Dolan
    , @anarchyst
  49. DanFromCT says:
    @IronForge

    Are you allowed to have scissors?

  50. @IronForge

    Still less evidence that Moses existed than Jesus did. But if you raise that point, then you’re the new Hitler who wants to murder six gorillion.

    Oy, what a shonda.

    • Agree: Old and Grumpy
  51. Chris Moore says: • Website

    The ((Jews)) had a narrow window following WW2 to impose their will on their Anglosphere and Commie partners in crime, and the world they controlled, and they succeeded fabulously, with the help of soulless Bolsheviks, cynics, atheists, opportunists, Satanists, Freemasons, etc… all manner of cults and misfits. But now this nest of vipers has finally reached its essence, which is a state of perpetual back-biting and backstabbing. So not only is it fighting the authentic Christians, but also the schizo elements of its own fraying coalition, and it’s beginning to fail bigtime.

    This coalition of cults (identity politics) under the authority of the Zionist cult can’t run a civilization, by definition. It’s built to serve itself and it’s cult interests, and to penalize any out-group. When it could hoodwink a plurality of rubes, and buy off enough corrupt Judas sociopaths, and smear all opposition as “anti-Semites,” it was fine. But those days are over, and soon its tyrrany will be over.

    The world simply can’t function absent a strong, vibrant, confident ‐‐ and more importantly, good-willed (towards the civilized) ‐‐ civilization running the show.

    Expect the next stage of Christendom to take the reins.

    When it does, these organized sociopaths and nests of vipers MUST be spectacularly brought to justice if the world is to survive. We can’t tolerate bomb-throwing psychopaths as our ruling elite ever again.

    The Brits had their chance, and they fumbled it away to the Zionist sociopaths. They were simply too greedy, too arrogant, and too soulless.

  52. Too much & too chaotic.

    The author crammed everything, from Christ to Nazis and Sartre and modern Israel, so one simply doesn’t understand what’s it all about. I’ll give just two short answers:

    1. a Jew is someone who considers himself to be Jewish and whom others consider to be a Jew. So- Karl Marx need not apply.

    2. for secular Jews in the West, Auschwitz has replaced Torah & Talmud, so their identity is not rooted anymore in historical ethnic religious culture, but in fear. For them WW2 was yesterday.

    Other than that, I would recommend a few serious & seminal works worth reading.

  53. jonjon22 says:

    No such thing as antisemitic and judges (who are supposed to be intelligent) know this which beggars the question “How much are the judges being paid to falsely prosecute?”If the average courtroom threw out any antisemitic claim before it even reaches the barristers then we wouldn’t hear ridiculous false claims of antisemitic.
    The Semites never left Babylon with their full “true” bloodline intact if they ever managed to leave in the first place, The Shem bloodline vanished thousands of years ago so how are these Ashkenazis allowed to play the antisemitic card?

  54. An outstanding essay, looks like I must include yet another talented writer to my list of required reading. One cannot have too many talented writers to follow, but as the hour is getting dangerously late, the question remains, “Is there enough time left?”

  55. Zumbuddi says:
    @anarchyst

    This Land is MINE, God Gave This Land to MEEEE

  56. @Haxo Angmark

    I know, a contradiction in terms – lunacy by the stupid.

    I looked into this is detail and this is my conclusion – my view only….. Why they are attacking “predominately white Christians” is that we can generally think for ourselves… whereas Asians and Muslims can be “guided” or “nudged” by either National or religions concepts – so whilst Asians in general may have a higher IQ than us, they are more easily manipulated.

    So to the global parasites, we are seen as their greatest threat – hence the Kalgeri plan and everything you see going on nowadays.

    Not saying I am correct as it is just my view, but have a think about that… also take into account why they want to literally eliminate “Native tribes” … this bit is fascinating as you get into “higher consciousness and stuff … a balance in nature” and we know the globalist do not want that.

    https://brandnewtube.com/watch/UVjhqxzXLOXESzm <<< last time I will post if UNZ lets me, please circulate everywhere

  57. Ayax says:

    How to Become an Anti-Semite?

    1. Copy where they are successful.
    2. Reinvent and improve where they fail.
    3. Do for yourself/ethnic/country exactly what they do for themselves/ethnic/country.
    4. Do and deal with others the exact opposite of what they do to others and the exact opposite of how they deal with others.

  58. HT says:

    In the minds of Jews, anyone who is white is an anti-semite and therefore white culture and much of the white race must be destroyed. How evil and deceptive these people are who can behave any way they want and substitute evil for good in a culture, yet always paint themselves as victims and above any criticism. People are so easily hoodwinked by the Jew. As Jesus said, they are a brood of vipers.

  59. Realist says:
    @Chris Moore

    The irony is that it is ((Jews)) who are responsible for the transatlantic slave trade (in keeping with their slavemaster ethics).

    It was White Christian landowners that bought them.

    • Replies: @Chris Moore
  60. @HeebHunter

    Not quite accurate.

    The NT is an entirely new deal, a new covenant.

    Your interpretation is the false “judeo-Christian” nonsense that connects two very disparate forms of religion.

    The OT God was quite harsh and stubborn and warrior like…..while the God of the NT is loving and forgiving and kind.

    In the NT, God divorced the jews who did not accept Christ. A remnant of jews did convert to become Christians. In the OT, the jews were the chosen people…..in the NT, it is Christians that are chosen.

    Oh, here is the dividing line….none come to the Father but through the Son. (John 14:6)
    So, the NT makes the OT obsolete. Access to God is through Christ alone. In other words….
    the jews who worship the OT God are not worshiping God at all (some would say that they worship satan)

    The above explication explains why the jews seek the destroy Christianity and why they continue to try to have the NT censored and re-written. Christian universalism (love for all who accept Christ) is a direct renunciation of jewish particularism and ingroup preference.

    And this is why history oscillates between jews and notsees over and over and over again 109 times or more.

    • Agree: Liosnagcat
    • Replies: @anarchyst
    , @HeebHunter
  61. anon[147] • Disclaimer says:

    One who says :
    Zionist used Britain to occupy Palestine
    Zionist bribed USA to get into war to help UK win the war
    Zionist started letter bomb ,car bombs and teorrism in Palestine
    Zionsit used false flag
    Zionsit decorated themselves in Arab garb to get hard hit by stupid bribed corrupt
    English and later US
    Before USS Liberty ,there was Lavon and before 911 there was Lebanon and
    USS Liberty
    7 nations were attacked to protect Israel
    911 is insider job
    PNAC worked for Israel then worked for USA for Israel
    FDD is the twin of PNAC for the twin of Iraq ,i.e Iran
    who supported Occupy Wall Street
    Who questions western lies on Iran ’s nuclear program
    Who supports Palestine state as endorsed and voted by UN Gen Assembly whose other
    part was state of Israel.
    Who doesn’t support Syrian attack by Israel or USA

    is Antisemitic .

  62. anon[354] • Disclaimer says:

    Jews are the closest people to Europeans in the Middle East. Most are about 1/2 Italian plus abit more from other European countries. That said, Jews don’t identify as Europeans and even promote the hatred of Europeans.

  63. HT says:

    As a religious issue, Old Testament Israel was a type and shadow representing the Christian church that was to come. The sacrificial system it participated in was a picture of the sacrifice of Christ. Once the earthly work of Jesus was completed, all of that went away. Israel was replaced by the Church. That is why the creation of the state of Israel by the UN was a total scam. The Jews who refuse their true Messiah, Jesus, are simply unbelievers just like all others. Why they are treated so royally by so many Christians is mind boggling. No one hates Christians more than Jews.

    • Agree: Robert Dolan
  64. Phibbs says:

    The first people to persecute Christians were Jews. (Remember St. Stephen, anyone?) Judaism and Christianity are enemy religions. They always have been. Jews hate Christianity in general — and Caucasian Christians in particular — more than anything else. Even in Israel today, Christians are being persecuted. And of course Jesus knew he was starting a new religion. Whoever says he was a mere “reformer” inside Judaism never read the New Testament.

    • Replies: @RockaBoatus
  65. anarchyst says:

    Israel practices official “apartheid” to a much greater degree than that of any other country in the world—the former South Africa included.
    Every vehicle driver in Israel proper and in the illegally occupied territories is identified by his or her vehicle license plate as well as personal documentation (identity papers). License plates are coded as to the ethnicity and religious persuasions of the owners, and are used to deny basic “rights” to those who are of “the wrong ethnicity”.
    There are roads and thoroughfares that are designated “for jews only”. “Jews-only” roads and thoroughfares are state-of-the-art, paid for with American taxpayer dollars, while roads used by Palestinians are poorly maintained, with many military “checkpoints” which adds further misery to the lives of Palestinians.
    Any Arab or Palestinian who attempts to use “jews only” roads or thoroughfares is arrested and heavily fined.
    This policy even extends to “footpaths” which are designated by “jewishness”.
    Palestinians and other Arabs are forced to go through humiliating “checkpoints”, even being delayed for HOURS, if they are even allowed to pass, at the whim of the jewish “authorities”. This even extends to medical emergencies, where ambulances are routinely delayed by jewish authorities, “just because they can”.
    In Israel proper, and in the illegally occupied territories, Israeli officials make rules and laws as they go along, ignoring the (official) laws (rule of law) already in place.
    On a whim, any Israeli official can declare that a building, other structure, planted farmland, water wells, and other basic facilities owned by Palestinians are “illegal” and subject to demolition.
    This even applies to buildings, lands, orchards and crop-producing lands which have been in Palestinian possession for centuries. All the Israeli military has to do is to declare the Palestinian-owned property to be a “military zone”. No other laws or permissions are needed to expropriate land from the Palestinians. Quite often, Palestinians are forced to demolish their own homes in order to avoid being heavily fined.
    Water is heavily restricted in Gaza and in the Palestinian areas while jewish settlements can use all the water they want.
    Sewage from illegal jewish settlements is routinely dumped on Palestinian land without regard to the pollution problems that it causes.
    The old belief that jews poison the wells and farmlands of their perceived “enemies” is actually true, as (illegal) jewish “settlers” routinely poison Palestinian-owned wells and croplands.
    This is a continuing process that is forcing Palestinians off their land and facilitating the building of jewish “settlements” in the illegally occupied areas.
    Let’s turn to the treatment of Christians in Israel proper. In the tourist areas, jewish authorities try to keep the disrespect for Christianity to a minimum so as not to insult their brainwashed Christian zionist tourists. In fact, the hatred for Christian churches, and Christians in general is so pervasive, it is not surprising to see jews “spit” when walking past a Christian church.
    The Israeli authorities plan specific itineraries for Christian zionist groups and American politicians so they do not witness the overt, outright hatred that jews have for Christians, You see, “it’s all for show” when it comes to begging for American dollars from the American taxpayers and from these misguided Christian zionist groups.
    Jews are experts at “graffiti”, calling it “price tagging” which they use to good effect as the authorities generally “look the other way” when the vandalism and destruction of Christian facilities by jews is going on.
    The irony of the situation is that the Palestinians (true semites) who have lived in the middle east for centuries and even millennia are reduced to being unwelcome in their own land while jewish interlopers, most of them who are not even “semites”, from the United States and Europe are overlords in Israel and in the illegally occupied territories.

  66. Kapyong says:

    There can be confusion between the Virgin Birth and the Immaculate Conception – they are not the same thing at all.

    The Virgin Birth is Mary giving birth to Jesus – an ancient belief.

    The Immaculate Conception refers to Mary being conceived (traditionally by parents Anne and Joachim.) A late belief only promulgated by Erroneous Pope Pius IX in 1854.

    Because of Catholic belief that parents having sex stains a new-born child with Original Sin – a stain which must be removed by baptism. But Mary was born before Christianity existed, thus never baptised, leaving her stained with Original Sin when conceiving Jesus.

    Jesus could not possibly be stained with Original Sin, so this problem eventually lead to the doctrine of the Immaculate Conception – that Mary alone of all humanity was conceived without the stain of sex. The only immaculate sex in all of human history.

  67. anarchyst says:
    @Robert Dolan

    Actually much of the destruction of the Catholic Church occurred with the imposition of the changes that were brought on by the “Vatican II Ecumenical Council”.

    The beginning of the end of traditional Catholicism was sealed with the infiltration of the Catholic Church Vatican II Ecumenical Council of the 1960s by Jews and Protestants who were involved in the “modernization” of the Catholic Church.

    Much Catholic ritual and doctrine was discarded or changed, in order to reflect the “age” that we live in, as well as the promotion of the absolution of the Jews for Jesus Christ’s crucifixion and death, despite vitriolic Jewish hatred of Jesus Christ and Christianity which exists to this day.

    The fact is, the Jews DID get the Romans to crucify Jesus Christ and DID accept full responsibility for his crucifixion and death. As is the case today, they got others (Pontius Pilate) to do their “dirty work” for them…

    Prior to Vatican II, the Jews WERE held responsible for the crucifixion and death of Jesus Christ by their own words. The changes brought on by Vatican II elevated the Jews to a supremacist state, being described as “our elder brothers”–a BIG mistake and corruption of Catholic doctrine.

    The “new covenant” brought into being by Jesus Christ was reduced to that of a minor footnote in Catholic doctrine while Jewish supremacy over Catholicism was firmly established.

    Abandoning the use of Latin in the Mass destroyed its universality. Previous to Vatican II, one could attend Mass anywhere in the Roman Catholic world and understand the meaning of the Mass.

    Prohibition of the celebration of the Tridentine Mass (except by special ecclesiastical permission) pushed many Catholics away from the new Modern Mass and the New Church, in general. It took a brave Archbishop Lefebvre and the Society of St. Pius X to push back” against Vatican II and re-legitimize the celebration of the pre-Vatican II Tridentine Mass and other Catholic rites. To this day, Novus Ordo church officials are attempting to stamp out pre-Vatican II practices.

    In pre-Vatican II times, the priest (celebrant of the Mass) was considered to be a part of the congregation, and a representative of the people.

    By turning the priest around to face the congregation, the priest was no longer a representative and a part of the congregation, but an actor, diminishing his status and importance.

    One area where the Roman Catholic Church could improve itself involves celibacy, which is NOT Church dogma or doctrine. Celibacy was put in place during the middle ages in order to keep Church property from being inherited by family and relatives of priests and bishops. Celibacy was based on purely financial considerations, nothing more. It is interesting to note that Episcopal (Anglican) priests who convert to Catholicism can bring their families with them to the Church while Roman Catholic priests are denied marriage. Not only that, there are Catholic sects (other than Roman Catholic) that do provide for married clergy.

    It was a grave mistake by the Church to de-legitimize pre-Vatican II principles.
    Fortunately, there are Catholic organizations that still subscribe to pre-Vatican II principles, one being the Society of St. Pius X (SSPX).

    • Thanks: Robert Dolan
    • Replies: @Z-man
    , @Robert Dolan
  68. Anonymous[559] • Disclaimer says: • Website

    Tom starts fine and then the article goes to ground.It looks like the author didn’t know how to end it.

  69. There is no way I can be labeled an Anti-Semite; Palestinians, Syrians, and the Lebanese are all Semites, and I’m not against them! And neither am I a Judeophobe; what’s to be afraid of there?
    But if you want to say I’m anti-Zionist…well, you might be onto something.

  70. It’s so easy to be anti-supremitic.

    Yes, The U.S. Is Stealing Syrian Oil, Dummy!

  71. egwin says:
    @Haxo Angmark

    If the “Jewishness of Christianity” is so fundamental (to Christianity), then why is it that it is only “today’s” Christians that are so susceptible, and not Christendom for the thousand years during which it was dominant in Europe? “Jewification” crept into Christianity at the exact moment when Christianity gave up its traditions and its claim to universality. It is a sign of weakness and decay, the very opposite of a “fundamental” or inherent quality.

  72. GenFranco says:
    @IronForge

    Good grief, man! Get some freaking help (counseling, pharmaceuticals). Even if you are right about EVERYTHING it is narcissistic and psychotic to post that much shit on a shared opinion site.

    Your wife to her boyfriend : “He NEVER shuts up!”

  73. GenFranco says:
    @bert33

    Next time you visit Israel go during Orthodox Christian Easter. You can watch the Orthodox Christians attempt to attend Easter services in their sacred spaces while being spat upon, pelted with rocks and debris, their car tires slashed, and abused with all manner of obscenities by Israeli Jews. You can also watch the police stand around and shrug when any of the Christians complain about this treatment.

    This past Easter even visitors from America and diplomats got some of the usual treatment. Not to worry: they all came back and made it clear they didn’t want the “incident” to contribute to anti-semitism. I showed some video of this to an American Christian Evangelical. His response: “Good!”

  74. The prime purpose of the newly launched academic field of psychoanalysis, which later gave birth to critical race theory, and later on to a bizarre “French Theory” curriculum, was to pathologize Whites into perpetual feelings of guilt.

    No, the prime purpose of psychoanalysis is to bring unconscious guilt into the individual’s awareness so that they may understand themselves and perhaps no longer be slaves to this phenomenon.

    The basic reason is that unconscious guilt is considered to be the root cause of the various neuroses, that make individual lives less rich.

    It is therefore pretty much the opposite of what you describe.

    Furthermore, it most commonly has nothing to do with race, had plenty of Jewish patients and is ultimately a secular science subtly built on insights from great books and traditional belief systems.

    This makes it mind-blowing that so-called trads see it as the enemy. It is perhaps the most successful and widespread modern attempt at traditionalism.

    However, I do understand how someone revealing the extreme feelings of guilt to you, that exist in your unconscious, may seem like them manipulate you into guilt, but your response, of ridiculous hyperbolic dismissal, is just a narcissistic defense, complete with your bizarre projections onto Jews.

    The thing to remember is that just because those feelings of guilt exist in your unconscious, it doesn’t mean that they are deserved in any sort of moral sense.

    And that just because you are bizarrely projecting onto Jews, it doesn’t mean that none of what you are putting on top of them cannot also be true.

    I often sense the desperate desire by many with RW politics to never examine how they themselves actually feel, which is pure cowardice. It is the ego being unwilling to be challenged by the rest of the self. You have your politics, they say you shouldn’t feel guilty, so you go mental whenever you start to feel any sense of guilt. In other words, you prioritise your political abstract thoughts over everything else about you, even to yourself. To both Freud and Nietzsche, who are very similar in key ways, this is pathetic.

    It also tends to result in the kind of nihilism that you commonly see on the online RW. It might hide behind weak pretenses of Christianity, or National Socialism, or some other LARP, but anybody normal immediately detects the bitter and resentful nihilism that pervades such spaces. This is because the ego’s victory is false, and the only thing it leaves is a feeling of empty, meaningless, as all other feelings are ignored, for contradicting the ego.

    It was good when Jung was much more popular among the online RW, as he created the advanced Freudianism 2.0, much to Freud’s bittersweet envy.

    But the narcissistic defence of unconsciously guilt-ridden, self-hating individuals seems to have succeeded in shutting out even those rays of light. And you guys are back to being in a impossibly dark land of delusion, ash and irrelevance.

    But you don’t have to believe anything I write. You can experiment yourselves, very easily, if you’re not too weak to try. Write done every concrete and specific epithet you can about the dastardly Jew, and every other horrible insult that you can. Then sit and reflect on how all of those things exist inside yourself, how they are usually how some parts of you treat other parts of you.

    E.g

    “the Jew always makes me feel guilty” becomes “I frequently experience feelings of guilt.”

    And

    “The Jew ignores his own humanity by using his ideology to shut out human feelings of guilt so that he can use people for his benefit” becomes “I ignore my feelings by using anti-Jew hatred to shut down any guilt that comes into my consciousness so that I can inflate my own ego at my feelings’ expense.”

    What have you got to lose? Especially since you have everything to gain, which is yourself.

    And, again, it doesn’t actually mean that your politics can’t also be true. Reality can just so happen to conform to your inner struggle. So please don’t fall into the narcisistic defense of saying that a push for you to get to know yourself is a shadowy attempt at subversion. I get why it feels like it, but that’s actually only because it isn’t!

  75. Z-man says:
    @anarchyst

    Yes, as I’ve mentioned good Bishops like Williamson and the SSPX.
    Good post, thanks.

  76. TeeJay says:

    @ Zumbuddi


    “so take my hand” always cracks me up!

  77. Hitch says:

    3000 years of history encapsulated in one meme:

  78. anarchyst says:

    It is interesting to note that before the establishment of israel, the USA had NO enemies in the middle east.
    As most jews are not “semites” it is laughable to hear jews rally about “anti-semitism”.

  79. anarchyst says:

    Only jewish suffering counts…
    Let’s not forget the so-called jewish “holocaust™” (which most aspects and claims of can easily be disproven) in which “jewish suffering is the only suffering that counts” and that suffering of everyone else during the world wars is ignored.
    You see, in the jewish mind, us gentiles are “livestock with souls, to be used for the advantage of the jews” and as such, gentile suffering is inconsequential, no different than that of livestockor other non-human animals, and can be ignored. It’s all in their talmud.

  80. @Priss Factor

    Wow. Priss Factor is posting also as

    Andrea Ostrov Letania says:
    July 28, 2022 at 7:17 pm

    The thing is to become a Anti-Supremite.

    Supremite: Supremacist Semite.

    Anti-Supremitism: Against Supremacist Semites.

    We need to stop calling them ‘neocons’. Call them ‘supremites’.

    And instead of ‘Great Replacement’, better to say ‘White Nakba’.

    at The Occidental Observer. AOL has posted here at Unz also. I’m not familiar with other places he/she might be commenting.

    I wonder how many identities this person has? Maybe Kolya Krassotkin too? Professional commenters are a real downer. I don’t think Unz is doing much to prevent it.

    Reply

    • Replies: @anon
  81. @IronForge

    Here’s the first part of a very good series from a very knowledgeable guy when it comes to Jesus and the Bible.

  82. This is the comment I left yesterday at The Occidental Observer. Bears repeating.

    Carolyn Yeager says:
    July 29, 2022 at 1:22 pm
    From Tom’s article:
    “In passing it must be stated over and over again that the pejorative word “Nazism”, although not legally banned in private communications, was never used officially in even one document in National-Socialist Germany. The term “Nazi” was first coined by early Spartacists, i.e., early German Moscow-steered Bolsheviks in Weimar Germany, later to be used massively in the Soviet Union, before it comfortably settled during the 1950s in American academic and media vernacular. Its derogatory equivalent would be “commie” for a communist, although not a single academic paper in the US or EU would accept a paper where a word “commie” is used as a synonym for a communist.
    […]
    The two-syllable word “Nazi” sounds more demonic [than National-Socialist], hence more acceptable in the mainstream media.”

    I was moved to comment on this yesterday, but like so much these days, sufficient motivation to follow through and ‘put myself out there’ wavers and fades. But thank you, Tom Sunic, for remembering to mention this once again (yes, to “put yourself out there”). I have made the point, and still stand by it, that “Hitlerism” is an acceptable, and correct, shorter term to use for Germany’s National-Socialist Weltanschaaung, but “Nazism” is not.

    How I would like to see you engage in a debate with Ron Unz, the “celebrated good Jew”, on this subject of the propriety of “Nazi” and “Nazism.” Do you think Ron will publish (copy) this article to his Unz Review, as he has so very many of the articles at TOO in the past year? I hope so. I’d hope you would engage with the commenters. I note you have your own list of “good Jews.” One I think should not be there is Gilad Atzmon, since he upholds the Holohoax.

    • Thanks: Liosnagcat
    • Replies: @The Old Philosopher
  83. @Priss Factor

    Jews can do whatever they like, but it’s always YOUR fault if you are appalled by Jewish behavior or agenda.

    “The Jew cries out in pain as he strikes you.” ~ Old Polish Proverb

    • Replies: @Shafar Nullifidian
  84. @omegabooks

    …whose king was called Kagan….how many Jews have that last name?

    Lazar Kaganovitch (1893-1991), one of Stalin’s most proficient mass murderers. A Jew who, like so many of his fellow Bolshevik scum, lived far longer than he deserved to, facing no accountability or repercussions whatsoever for his many crimes against humanity.* Funny how his coethnics duck and cover at any mention of him and his fellow criminals, ubiquitous as they were in that era and in that place.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lazar_Kaganovich

    (*From the linked Pikiwedia article:

    “In 1961, Kaganovich was completely expelled from the Party and became a pensioner living in Moscow. His grandchildren reported that after his dismissal from the Central Committee, Kaganovich [who had a reputation for his temperamental and allegedly violent nature] never again shouted and became a devoted grandfather.

    “In 1984, his re-admission to the Party was considered by the Politburo, alongside that of Molotov. During the last years of life he played dominoes with fellow pensioners and criticized Soviet media attacks on Stalin with words: ‘First, Stalin is disowned, now, little by little, it gets to prosecute socialism, the October Revolution, and in no time they will also want to prosecute Lenin and Marx.’ Shortly before death he suffered a heart attack.”)

    Sickening.

    Every.Single.Effing.Time.

  85. @bert33

    One thing you will also note when you visit Israel is a marked distain for American Jews (the ones who remain in the comfort of the American satrapy and just send money to their cousins who actually walked the talk and have returned to the “promised land”, NOT the few who have actually emigrated there).

    Although I haven’t set foot in Israel in nearly 40 years, I vividly recall conversations with Sabras (native-born Israelis) who loved Americans in general that they had met, but who LOATHED American Jews for their arrogance, hypocrisy, and worship of wealth that the average Israeli Sabra could only dream of. That doesn’t get a whole lot of attentio here in the U.S., for very obvious reasons.

  86. A. Clifton says: • Website

    no dallas cowboys at the alamo

    no {{{JEWS}}} in the old testament

    use anti-semanticism

    SEE ALSO : Vigilantes of Christendom by Richard Kelly Hoskins

    RE-SEGREGATION, @ Matthew 13:39-43

    oh yeah{way}….talmud not “written” until 500 AD

  87. Maybe Jews are right about goyim having no souls. Just look at all those white dummies.

  88. @Phibbs

    “Whoever says he was a mere “reformer” inside Judaism never read the New Testament” – True, and that’s part of the problem – the critics aren’t reading closely the Gospels! They come to the New Testament with a certain preconception about Jesus – such as Him being a “reformer,” or an “Essene leader,” or that he was “like Buddha,” and other ridiculous notions.

    Such persons are not content to allow Jesus to be who He claimed to be, so they put on their mystical and quasi-religious spectacles and try to convince us that Jesus was some Jewish hippie who pranced about spewing esoteric and ‘feel good’ spiritual advice. If this is the only thing Jesus ever did, the Jewish religious leaders would not have been so desperate to murder Him.

    No, Jesus and Christianity are a threat to Jews and Judaism because of His message. Christianity is not anti-Jewish in an ethnic sense since Jesus and His apostles were ethnically Jewish. However, it is anti-Judaism or anti-rabbinical at its core and that’s why Jews have spent the past 2000 years seeking to destroy it at all costs.

    Similarly, those who espouse the belief that Paul the apostle “invented” Christianity as a “Jewish deception” in order to “deceive gentiles,” have gone so overboard in their criticism of Jews that they have lost their way. They have ceased to be rational. It’s also apparent that they haven’t read carefully the New Testament which is filled with statements of Jewish stubbornness, their hearts being hardened to the truth, their opposition to God, them not being “pleasing to God, but hostile to all men” (1 Thessalonians 2:15), and as describing them as false Jews who worship in a “synagogue of Satan” (Revelation 3:9).

    If that’s supposed to be the “great Goyim deception” invented by Jews, it hasn’t worked. It’s failed miserably. And realize also that the acceptance of Zionism among Christians is almost exclusively a North American thing and of recent origin too.

  89. Chris Moore says: • Website
    @Realist

    It was White Christian landowners that bought [the Black slaves from Jewish slavers].

    It was some White ((Christian)) landowners. A faction. A Judas faction. A Judas faction that has partnered with ((Jews)) down through history. A Judas faction that can’t contain its own insatiable and irrational greed, hatred, weakness, sickness and sociopathy. A Judas faction compelled against the last vestiges of its humanity to grab the loot and temporal easy living with the ((Jew)), civilization be damned.

    Judas has always been there. Today he walks in the person of Pelosi, Cheney, Biden, Graham…

    A Judas faction that is only just beginning to pay for its heinous evil and treachery.

    • Replies: @Realist
    , @anarchyst
  90. The Old Testament is by far the most far-reaching and influential work of Jewish fiction ever written and published, followed closely by the Jewish holohoax which will likely one day eclipse it in total revenue and influence – if it has not already done so.

  91. @anarchyst

    Yes….the Catholic church really screwed up….that’s why Mel Gibson left and built his very own church in Malibu.

    EMJ has gone over this stuff many times.

    It’s sad because the church used to keep the jewing down to a bare minimum….but now the church does the jewing itself.

    • Replies: @anarchyst
  92. Realist says:
    @Chris Moore

    A Judas faction. A Judas faction that has partnered with ((Jews)) down through history.

    Many of our Founding Fathers were from that Judas faction.

    • Replies: @Chris Moore
  93. @Hitch

    Jews have controlled France for a very long time, and still do. They planned, instigated and led the French Revolution.

    • Replies: @Hitch
  94. anarchyst says:
    @Robert Dolan

    There are still “pre-Vatican II” Roman Catholic parishes out there. They are being marginalized by the present “pope”, being told they cannot celebrate the Tridentine Mass, but hopefully, most (if not all) of them are ignoring the pope’s “ruling”.
    The SSPX is but one “pre-Vatican II” Roman Catholic rite.

  95. anarchyst says:
    @Chris Moore

    Actually the majority of slaveowners in the north and south were jewish themselves. Jews were expensive to purchase and maintain and as such, only wealthy people could afford them.
    Jews owned and financed the slave traders, the ships, insured them and their crews, ran the slave auction houses (which were always closed on the sabbath) and ran the whole enterprise.

    • Thanks: Angharad
    • Replies: @Robert Dolan
  96. Phibbs says:
    @RockaBoatus

    Rock, so true. Every documentary about the life of Jesus I have ever seen always claims “The Romans killed Jesus because he was a political threat.” Nowhere in the New Testament are the Romans ever blamed for the murder of Jesus; only Jews are. But that doesn’t matter to the “theologians” invited to speak on these shows. Finally, Satan is real. His favored children seem to be the Jews. The Jews get ever more power from their hellish father in exchange for their loyalty to him. That is why Jesus called ALL Jews who rejected him the ‘Synagogue of Satan.’ Indeed. so strong is Satan that most Born-Again Christians are convinced that serving Israel is serving God. Serving the interests of Israel is serving Satan. Despite all evangelicals claiming they hate Satan, in actuality, they serve and worship him just the same. Fake President Biden proudly announced that he is a “Zionist” — which just means he’s a worker for the Devil’s interests.

  97. JR Foley says:
    @Ann Nonny Mouse

    Today we have a Nazi Jew in Kyiv and Amtrak Joe shoving money at this comedian which would make the Three Stooges drool.

  98. @anarchyst

    https://misdivision.livejournal.com/88377.html

    jews and muslims ran the slave trade for thousands of years until white men ended slavery.

  99. frankie p says:

    “How to Become an Anti-Semite?”

    What an easy question to answer.
    The answer is: pay attention and think critically.
    The outcome will be complete Antisemitism.

    Pay attention to how every time a Jewish intellectual or politician speaks, you feel attacked, hated, and unjustly slandered. Think critically about it.

    Pay attention to how Jews drive unchecked immigration of third world out-groups to Europe/America, undermining, weakening, and eventually destroying of the original national identity and culture. Notice that they do NOT do the same for Israel or in fact the rest of the world. Chinese and Indians would NEVER accept such a narrative or project. Think critically about it.

    Pay attention to who advocates and fills the ranks of those pushing for a world government, be they in the WEF, EU, CEOs of global corporations, etc. When all modern nations are miscegenated and mixed, nations will disappear and the “messiah” of the Jews can finally arrive, making them the world government and leaders. This is what they believe and work for. Think critically about it.

    Pay attention to how the Jews and Judaism itself despise that which is not Jewish, and strive to destroy it. Think critically about it.

    I’m totally, radically antisemitic. I’m not a little bit or slightly antisemitic. How can one say that they have a slight desire to survive, for their family and culture to survive? Humans have a total, unbridled desire to survive. The essence, the fundamental ideology of Judaism, is to destroy everything that is not Jewish. I am opposed to this political project of the Jews, so I must be a complete antisemite. Antisemitism has existed as long as Jews have existed. It is the natural and correct response from Gentiles to a group hell bent on destroying them. For those who want to challenge me and point out that our host, Ron Unz, is a Jew, I can only say this. Antisemitism is NOT the hatred of every Jew, every human that has a Jewish parent, grandparent or ancestor. There are many Jews who defend the nation, ethnicity and even religion of the society, culture and people among whom they have settled. These people live on the fringes of Judaism or have turned their backs on it completely; alternatively, many of them never adopted the inhuman ideology of Judiasm. We must accept these individuals among us. They are us.

    • Thanks: mocissepvis
  100. @Robert Dolan

    “The OT God was quite harsh and stubborn and warrior-like…..while the God of the NT is loving and forgiving and kind.

    In the NT, God divorced the Jews who did not accept Christ”

    Where are you even attempting to contradict what I said? God has always been the same. He divorced the yids. Everyone has to profess Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior to be saved, period. That is the whole point.

    Oh, here is the dividing line….none come to the Father but through the Son. (John 14:6)
    So, the NT makes the OT obsolete. Access to God is through Christ alone. In other words….
    the Jews who worship the OT God are not worshiping God at all (some would say that they worship satan)

    This is literally prots negro jive. Your reasoning is why Christ told us to pray the Our Father prayer, right?
    Any Christian of the olden days would string you up for spewing this tripe.
    Our God is a Triune God: The Father, The Son, and the Holy Spirit. Period.

    Now I understand why the Catholic Church had iron-clad dogmas. Negro Jive does immense damage.

    • Replies: @Liosnagcat
  101. Lol.. I’m a trad catholic and Catholicism is traditionally very hostile to jews. Trash article.

  102. @Wizard of Oz

    Re: “persecution”

    This is akin to an obnoxious, perhaps violent, drunk being kicked-out of bar after bar claiming the other patrons are to blame. That’s not persecution, that’s a healthy, civilized society saying there are certain standards we uphold and you’re in violation of them so, out you go.

  103. From the article:

    “How can one dismiss the self-evident Holocaust story yet at the same time embrace the self-evident story of the Jew Jesus Christ or the immaculate conception of the Jewess Virgin Mary?”

    Jesus and Mary were not Jews.

    From “The Controversy of Zion” by Douglas Reed (pp. 60-61):

    [MORE]

    This public assertion, “Jesus was a Jew,” is always used in our century for political purposes. It is often employed to quell objections to the Zionist influence in international politics or to the Zionist invasion of Palestine, the suggestion being that, as Jesus was a Jew, none ought to object to anything purporting to be done in the name of Jews. The irrelevance is obvious, but mobs are moved by such phrases, and the paradoxical result, once again, is that a statement, most offensive to literal Jews, is most frequently made by non-Jewish politicians and ecclesiastics who seek Jewish favour.

    The English abbreviation, “Jew,” is recent and does not correspond to anything denoted by the Aramaic, Greek or Roman terms for “Judahite” or “Judean,” which were in use during the lifetime of Jesus. In fact, the English noun “Jew” cannot be defined (so that dictionaries, which are scrupulously careful about all other words, are reduced to such obvious absurdities as “A person of Hebrew race”); and the Zionist state has no legal definition of the term (which is natural, because the Torah, which is the Law, exacts pure Judahite descent, and a person of this lineage is hardly to be found in the entire world).

    If the statement, “Jesus was a Jew,” has meaning therefore, it must apply to the conditions prevailing in his time. In that case it would mean one of three things, or all of them: that Jesus was of the tribe of Judah (therefore Judahite); that he was of Judean domicile (and therefore Judean); that he was religiously “a Jew,” if any religion denoted by that term existed in his time.

    Race, residence, religion, then.

    This book is not the place to argue the question of Jesus’s racial descent, and the surprising thing is that Christian divines allow themselves some of the statements which they make. The reader should form his own opinion, if he desires to have one in this question.

    The genealogy of Mary is not given in the New Testament, but three passages might imply that she was of Davidic descent; St. Matthew and St. Luke trace the descent of Joseph from David and Judah, but Joseph was not the blood father of Jesus. The Judaist authorities discredit all these references to descent, holding that they were inserted to bring the narrative into line with prophecy.

    As to residence, St. John states that Jesus was born at Bethlehem in Judea through the chance that his mother had to go there from Galilee to register; the Judaist authorities, again, hold that this was inserted to make the account agree with Micah’s prophecy that “a ruler” would “come out of Bethlehem.”

    The Jewish Encyclopaedia insists that Nazareth was Jesus’s native town, and indeed, general agreement exists that he was a Galilean, whatever the chance of his actual birthplace. Galilee, where nearly all his life was spent, was politically entirely separate from Judea, under its own Roman tetrarch, and stood to Judea in the relationship of “a foreign country” (Graetz). Marriage between a Judean and a Galilean was forbidden, and, even before Jesus’s birth, all Judeans living in Galilee had been forced by Simon Tharsi, one of the Maccabean princes, to migrate to Judah.

    Thus, the Galileans were racially and politically distinct from the Judeans.

    Was this Galilean, religiously, what might today be called “a Jew”? The Judaist authorities, of course, deny that most strenuously of all; the statement, often heard from the platform and pulpit, might cause a riot in the synagogue.

    It is difficult to see what responsible public men can mean when they use the phrase. There was in the time of Jesus no “Jewish” (or even Judahite or Judaist or Judean) religion. There was Jehovahism, and there were the various sects, Pharisees, Sadducees and Essenes, which disputed violently between themselves and contended, around the temple, for power over the people. They were not only sects, but also political parties, and the most powerful of them were the Pharisees with their “oral traditions” of what God had said to Moses.

    If today the Zionists are “the Jews” (and this is the claim accepted by all great Western nations), then the party which in Judea in the time of Jesus corresponded to the Zionists was that of the Pharisees. Jesus brought the whole weight of his attack to bear on these Pharisees. He also rebuked the Sadducees and the scribes, but the Gospels show that he held the Pharisees to be the foe of God and man and that he used an especial scarifying scorn towards them. The things which he singled out for attack, in them and in their creed, are the very things which today’s Zionists claim to be the identifying features of Jews, Jewishness and Judaism.

    Religiously, Jesus seems beyond doubt to have been the opposite and adversary of all that which would make a literal Jew today or would have made a literal Pharisee then.

    None can say with certainty who or what he was, and these suggestive statements by non-Jewish politicians ring as false as the derisive and mocking lampoons about “the bastard” which circulated in the Jewish ghettoes.

    • Replies: @Goy Buoy
    , @RockaBoatus
  104. Petermx says:

    “Moreover, his historicity [that of Jesus] has been hotly and violently debated for over two thousand years by Christians and non-Christians alike. During the early Roman Empire his name was never mentioned anywhere in the works of Roman historians, except for the fact that the Roman high society and the educated Romans, until the beginning of second century AD considered Jews (Iudeai) and Christians (Chrestianos) as the one and the same sect. Therefore, the expression “Judeo-Christian” is by no means an oxymoron or a deliberate verbal corruption of a single religious denomination.”

    Couldn’t that be because the earliest Christians (the apostles) were ethnically Jewish? The modern day use of the phrase “Judeo-Christian”, which I read was invented in the USA during WW II (forgive me, but that I find easily believable) was never used in Europe and suggests a collegiality or friendship between Jews and Christians which never existed. A central belief in Christianity is (or was) that Jews would not be accepted into heaven unless they accepted Jesus as the son of God and their savior. Jews considered this so important that when they had the power after their victory in WW II (or at least being on the victorious side) they had Catholics alter the Christian religion and reject this notion when they forced Vatican II to reject it. And now many Catholic leaders and institutions laud the idea of Christian and Jewish friendship and unity while Jews demonize Germans (but also all central and eastern Europeans) as mass murderers of Jews while continuously lying about the more properly named “Holohoax” and lying about their own dominant role in Jewish-Bolshevism and their mass murder of tens of millions of Russians and Ukrainians, most notably the peasants they despised so much. This is a good deal for Jews. They get to insult at least half of Europe’s population every day, calling them “NAZIS” and murderers, while claiming to be their (Christianity’s) historic friends. Christianity was brought to America by Europeans. It didn’t start in the USA and Jews continuously attack Europe’s Christians (not that they really love America’s), who created all its traditions and were its defenders since it was founded. The Popes from centuries past would have none of this.

    https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2019/03/02/lying-about-judeo-bolshevism/

  105. @anarchyst

    Great comment and history lesson

  106. Atle says:

    My head is expanding even as I type.

  107. Goy Buoy says:

    Christianity is older than Judaism.
    The Old Testament Bible came under ‘Israelite’ writing.
    The New Testament writings were written by Christians who were no longer Jews.

    • Replies: @Liosnagcat
  108. There is nothing rational about Christian (or Judeo-Christian) lore or precepts so talking people out of it with rational argumentation is most often an exercise in futility. 99% of Christians know less about the Bible than the average critic of Christianity. Raised a Christian, nobody thought it necessary to mention that the scriptures were written decades after Christ’s purported crucifixion. Christianity tells its followers that they don’t have to die and that somebody loves them (Jesus). They’re not going to give that up for nothing in return.

    • Replies: @apollonian
  109. @RockaBoatus

    Christianity is not anti-Jewish in an ethnic sense since Jesus and His apostles were ethnically Jewish.

    You are wrong. Read my comment (No. 104 in this comment section).

  110. @HeebHunter

    Yahweh is not God the father. The OT God-the-father (creator God) was known as Elohim (El for short). Yahweh was a tribal god whom the Hebrews elevated to El in order to elevate themselves above the other tribes. It was classic propaganda.

    The disparity is not between the OT and NT versions of God the father; the disparity is between the OT Elohim and the OT Yahweh.

    Read Laurent Guyenot for a full explication.

  111. Goy Buoy says:
    @Liosnagcat

    Jesus would be closer to being an antisemite than he would a self hating Jew?

    I wonder what Douglass Reed had to say about ‘Semites’?

    • Replies: @Liosnagcat
  112. Hitch says:
    @Carroll price

    I was curious about when the Jews took over France, so I did a little research. This Jewish article describes how Louis XIV banned Jews from all French colonies, among other reasons for their control of the slave trade:

    September 24th, 1683: French King Louis XIV ordered Jews expelled from French colonies in North America

    The order was mostly ignored where it would be most relevant, in Martinique, the Caribbean land with the largest Jewish population. France had conquered Martinique in 1635; Jews had arrived there with the Dutch in the previous century, and it was a Sephardic Jew, Benjamin d’Acosta, who introduced the cultivation of the sugar-cane into the island’s slave system.

    More interesting was how thousands of the Germanic population fled Napoleon and his atheist army from Alsace and other Germanic states along the Rhine to farm in the black sea region and even Odessa:
    20 February 1804 Novaya Rossiya (Süd Rußland) Open for Settlement

    “Alexander’s invitation received “a prompt and lively response, especially in the provinces of Württemburg, Baden, and Rhine Palatinate and the northern cantons of Alsace.”

    Between 1808 and 1810, the Rhine-Franconian migration occurred with colonists from Baden, Alsace and Palatinate. About 2,000 families arrived in South Russia and established colonies in areas of Beresan, Glückstal and Kutchurgan in addition to more colonies in Chortitza and Prichib

    In 1812, Russia acquired Bessarabia, and on 19 November 1813, Tsar Alexander issued an invitation for colonists to settle in the southern part Bessarabia. German colonists who had originally settled in central Poland between 1796 and 1804, dissatisfied with their situation, left Poland to resettle in Bessarabia. Those 1,500 families established colonies between 1814 and 1815.”

    These pdf’s are also quite interesting:

    German Farming Achievements in the Black Sea Region, Population and Economy, 1825

    https://www.odessa3.org/journal/pohl.pdf

    To me it seems clear that first the Jacobins (the original Judeo-Communists), and then Napoleon, were the turning point for the Judaic takeover of western Europe and western Civilization.

  113. Tom Sunic says: • Website

    Yes. Hence semantic and conceptual distortions we’ve been witnessing so far. No way one can write objectively about WW2 and National -Socialism unless fully fluent in the German language and wholly familiar with German literature and philosophy of the 18th -19th ct. Same goes for the good and nuanced knowledge of the French and Italian languages when trying to grasp the cultural foundations of various brands of radical nationalism and racialism ( “proto-fascism” ) in Europe prior to WWII. BTW. How would an American reader look at a non-American historian, whose knowledge of the English is either poor or nonexistent, yet who writes about US Founding Fathers ? Check historians Ernst Nolte and Zeev Sternhell.

    • Thanks: Carolyn Yeager
  114. Chris Moore says: • Website
    @Realist

    Many of our Founding Fathers were from that Judas faction.

    Yes, it’s true. Which us why they U.S. is having such trouble today. It is paying for the sins of ((Jews)) and ((Jew)) stooges. We need to root out both, and hold them accountable for their sins of the past (slavery) and their contemporaneous, neo-slaver sin of globalism.

    In true ((Jew)) form, today they’re grandstanding against chattel slavery even as they pursue globalist slavery.

    Jesus spoke of these grandstanding ((Jews)), who made a big show of their piousnes outside of the synagogues, even as they were seething internally with malice and rage and bile.

    Similarly, these liberals and neocons are outraged… Ouraged! at “racist” White society and its abuses, even as they know they’re the ones who bear the most guilt, and are guilty of misanthropy to this day (“You will have nothing and be happy, slave!”) Their self-serving grandstanding and guilt-tripping is designed to obscure their own guilt, dodge accountability, scapegoat the innocent, and facilitate their next crime of the century.

    Authentic Christianity is most importantly a bottom line value system, and these ((Jews)) and their stooges don’t have a Christian bone in their wretched bodies. Their slaving past proves it; their intent to enslave under globalism proves it; and their own words prove it.

    The remnant conceit and egoism of the Anglo-elites (“Oy! Oy! Look at me! I’m Chosen, doncha know! You can be my slave!”) is the final proof of their ((Jew)) stooge treachery. And they make themselves known by their Zionism. When Joe Biden announced “I am a Zionist,” he was tipping his hat to anti-Christ evil.

    Is it any surprise an evil creature like that would raise a meth-smoking pedophile criminal like Hunter? And yot the average Dem voter just blinks in silence when informed of these facts. Biden stutters and talks like a hippy to paper over his bileous ((Jew)) essence (“C’mon man!”) but look past his method acting into his core, and there’s a very rotten person there.

    Jesus nailed his kind 2k years ago. Yet he’s still carrying on his hipster act outside the synagogue.

    • Replies: @Carolyn Yeager
  115. Swivel-eyed ventriloquist dummy Sartre was officially involved with lesbian feminist herald of the “second sex,” de Beauvoir. The latter raved in bobbysoxer-like love letters to Jew author Nelson Algren that she had “no more ardent desire than to be his slave.”

    The “modern marriage” between Sartre and de Beauvoir took shape in such a way that de Beauvoir regularly gave her many playmates to Sartre for food. When she was buried near her “longtime partner” Sartre, she still wore Algren’s engagement ring on her finger.

  116. The judgment of the Jews is clear: “Whites (Europeans) are potential murderers”.#

    They’re coming close to us everywehre and everytime with their “kind” (and and their millionfold imported invaders), as if they wanted to fulfill their prophecy that we all are murderers by all means. Why don’t they just go away and leave us and our way of life?

    Where is in this illogic the alleged “Jewish intelligence”?

    The only permissible conclusion is that “Jewish intelligence” consists of destroying others. How do they want to keep this irresolvable contradiction (and the constantly awakening knowledge about their true intentions) permanently under control?

    • Replies: @Hubba Bubba
  117. @Carolyn Yeager

    Actually, the use of “Nazi” as a pejorative for the National Socialists has nothing to do with the second word “socialist” in the name of the party. Instead, it dervies from the pronuciation of the word “National” which is pronounced as “Nazional” in German. Thue their opponents used the first two syllables of the first word to make fun of the party name.

    Churchill used it to great effect to mock the party name in English.

    • Replies: @Carolyn Yeager
  118. @Hubba Bubba

    According to Jewish way of thinking there can and must never be any justified reason for “anti-Semitism”. Although they themselves create it constantly, even provoke it with intention! Exactly in it their pathological hubris shows up. Nothing would be worse for the Jews than if they were no longer “world topic number one”! We all are supposed to take care of our own destroyers lovingly, we are supposed to sacrifice our lives for them. In truth this is already the fulfillment of the Talmudic slavery rule!

    • Replies: @anarchyst
  119. @The Old Philosopher

    FYI,
    “Nazi” stands for National-Socialist no matter whether taken from the first word or both words. So your comment has no impact on anything.

    Nor does your opinion on how Churchill, the buffoon, ‘tried’ to use it. Maybe you could have informed us of what you consider to have been the “great effect” of his mockery.

    Otherwise, thanks for drawing more attention to the subject it by your comment.

  120. anarchyst says:
    @Hubba Bubba

    It gets worse.
    In the USA, the census is prohibited from categorizing jews. It would appear that, as a group, jews are an extremely small part of the population, but their involvement in government, media and and entertainment industries, (((they))) are over represented. This is why (((they))) want to hide their true numbers.

    • Agree: Hubba Bubba
  121. anarchyst says:
    @HeebHunter

    Your name-calling exposes you as either a hasbara or a disgruntled zionist supporter.
    If you want to comment and appear intelligible, you need to grow up.

    • Replies: @HeebHunter
  122. Anon[291] • Disclaimer says:
    @IronForge

    Great breakdown, now do the harelip fraud known as Moses.

  123. @Chris Moore

    The remnant conceit and egoism of the Anglo-elites (“Oy! Oy! Look at me! I’m Chosen, doncha know! You can be my slave!”) is the final proof of their ((Jew)) stooge treachery. And they make themselves known by their Zionism. When Joe Biden announced “I am a Zionist,” he was tipping his hat to anti-Christ evil.

    Is it any surprise an evil creature like that would raise a meth-smoking pedophile criminal like Hunter? And yot the average Dem voter just blinks in silence when informed of these facts. Biden stutters and talks like a hippy to paper over his bileous ((Jew)) essence (“C’mon man!”) but look past his method acting into his core, and there’s a very rotten person there.

    Very well said, Chris. By their fruits you shall know them … Too bad more people won’t see the Bidens for what they are: traitors, rotten to the core criminals sucking unearned wealth from the nation of their birth. NO LOYALTY whatsoever.

    Joe is also a pedophile who took showers with his own daughter past any pretensions of age-appropriateness. And Jill goes along with everything.

    • Replies: @Anon
  124. Methinks says:

    There are really too many errors and approximations in this article.

    Céline’s pamphlets are not banned in France, it is Céline’s widow Lucette Almanzor, who died recently at 101 years old, who refused to republish them.

    “Nazi” is a German term, inspired by “Sozi” (socialist). As early as 1927 Joseph Goebbels had written the book Der Nazi-Sozi (Elberfeld, Verlag der Nationalsozialistischen Briefe).

  125. Anon[291] • Disclaimer says:
    @Carolyn Yeager

    Very well said, Chris. By their fruits you shall know them …

    Every fucking Zio-Christian I’ve ever met hangs their hat on Genesis 12:3:

    “And I will bless them that bless thee, and curse him that curseth thee: and in thee shall all families of the earth be blessed.”

    They believe/hope their bitch god Yah is going to throw them an extra bone here on Earth for their obedient behavior, which means they actually worship Mammon.

    If Revelation is correct, and the Christians do get their heads cut-off for the ‘faith’ during the End Times, they’ll have had it coming for their complicity with such an evil people.

  126. @Anon

    Sometimes I reply to these people by pointing out that Jews don’t love them now, and if Yahweh was really blessing them, Jews would love them. The only response I’ve got so far is that Jews do in fact love them (in spite of all the contrary evidence).

  127. @RockaBoatus

    If we take the New Testament to be literal truth, then it’s automatically self-discrediting. In some of the Gospels Jesus is described as prophecising the imminent end of the world. He even says “this generation shall not pass”. The world did not end so either the real Jesus was better than this and just something that ended up being attributed to him because of the people he associated with, or he did in fact say it. I prefer to believe that Jesus didn’t say these things, and that his eventual followers warped his message.

    No, Jesus and Christianity are a threat to Jews and Judaism because of His message. Christianity is not anti-Jewish in an ethnic sense since Jesus and His apostles were ethnically Jewish. However, it is anti-Judaism or anti-rabbinical at its core and that’s why Jews have spent the past 2000 years seeking to destroy it at all costs.

    Are you sure that it’s not White people that they’re trying to destroy? They don’t seem to mind Nigerian Christians or Mexican Christians all that much. Jews don’t like to put it like this, so they dress it up and pretend that it’s a religious conflict. Furthermore we don’t really know what Jews thought of early Christianity besides what’s written in the Bible. There hatred of Christianity seems to date back to the time when Christianity became Gentile-controlled. There’s nothing in the historical record documenting there feelings about it at the time of it’s origin. It’s not hard to imagine that Jews, seeing it as a deracinating subversive movement, were actually promoting it, up until that time. The certainly helped with the promotion of protestant Christianity, when it originated, because they saw it as a way to weaken goy society. That makes sense because they would want to undermine the Catholic church and elevate the important of the Old Testament (their own bible) in the minds of Gentiles.

    • Replies: @RockaBoatus
  128. @Goy Buoy

    You said, “I wonder what Douglass Reed had to say about ‘Semites’?”

    Well, wonder no more. Here’s a link to buy the book:

    And here’s a link to read it for free online (just scroll down about a half-page to get to the hyperlinked table of contents):

    https://controversyofzion.info/Controversybook/index.htm

  129. @Goy Buoy

    You really should read The Controversy of Zion by Douglas Reed.

  130. @anarchyst

    In fact, every jewish “holiday” (holy day) is based on the celebration of genocide and destruction of gentiles.

    I have heard of Purim that celebrates the mass murder of Haman, his sons and seventy five thousand members of his unsuspecting tribe (after Esther, her husband Mordecai and their fellow spies had infiltrated the palace, double crossed the eunuchs and duped the king) but have you a good source explaining how all the other Jewish holidays celebrate genocide? Thx.

  131. @Anon

    Revelation is not correct. It’s a bunch of hooey that should never have been added to the NT. It’s like accepting Allen Ginsberg as the prophet of God in our age. Nothing that one does not hear as truth from within oneself should be taken as the ‘Word of God.’ It’s pretty amazing that people do.

    I don’t consider Joe Biden, or any Bidens, Christians — do you? They’re only church members, through the incidence of their birth families and the times in which they’ve lived. Seems to me a Christian should be a sincere follower of Christ or don’t call yourself that. Professing “belief” means nothing.

  132. @Liosnagcat

    Thank you for the reference to Douglas Reed (a superb author and book by the way!). I understand where he’s coming from, but there are some misunderstandings on his part as to the origin and use of the term “Jew.” It’s like reading someone who has some knowledge on the topic, but at the same time is missing some vital pieces of information.

    It’s too long to get into now, but if you check some of the standard biblical encyclopedias and biblical dictionaries as I have in the past and read their in-depth articles on how the term “Jew” evolved, you might just think differently.

    I’ve been involved in biblical studies since 1980, and I have written extensively on a host of biblical subjects over the years. I’m no scholar, but I try to apply myself and be careful before reaching any conclusions. I’m not suggesting that you will necessarily agree with me, but I think it might provoke you to rethink a few things.

    Thank you again for your reply.

  133. @shadowy_figure

    “Furthermore we don’t really know what Jews thought of early Christianity besides what’s written in the Bible. There hatred of Christianity seems to date back to the time when Christianity became Gentile-controlled” – The conflict goes back to the very beginning starting with Jesus Himself and continues on throughout the centuries. Pharisaical and later rabbinic Judaism have historically stood opposed to Christianity in the fiercest ways. Unbelieving Jews have worked night and day throughout the centuries to subvert Christianity, and beginning in the 19th century they worked overtime doing so. Their hatred for Christianity is BOTH religious and racial in nature.

    Granted, you don’t take the New Testament’s own record on such matters, but there are few if any serious biblical scholars who maintain that the apostle Paul and rabbinical/Torah-centered Jews somehow aligned together to concoct Christianity for the purpose of ensnaring gentiles so that they could control them. It becomes even more absurd when one bothers to carefully read the numerous ‘anti-Semitic’ passages in the New Testament. How would any of this endeared the goyim to think that Jews were such wonderful people, particularly since they were the ones who crucified their Lord? Describing the Jewish place of worship as a “synagogue of Satan” as Jesus did in Revelation 3:9 is hardly conducive to Jew worship.

    Moreover, rather than encouraging the message contained in the New Testament to ensnare and deceive gentiles worldwide, Jews have worked tirelessly to dilute and eradicate its message. They don’t want the Goyim to read its contents because they will discover what Jesus really thought of rabbinical Judaism, how Jews ruthlessly persecuted the early Christians, and how Jews and Gentiles under the New Covenant have equal standing before God.

    Seriously, is that a theory you want to adhere to and advance?

    • Replies: @shadowy_figure
  134. Anon[291] • Disclaimer says:

    I don’t consider Joe Biden, or any Bidens, Christians — do you?

    Uh, no – and neither are Trump, O’Bama, Bush, Clinton, et al; what a strange question.

    Incidentally, from your comment up-thread:

    Joe is also a pedophile who took showers with his own daughter past any pretensions of age-appropriateness.

    Under what age, exactly, is it appropriate for a father to take a naked shower with his daughter?

    Personally, I’m going with ‘never’ on that one.

    • Replies: @Carolyn Yeager
  135. Johan says:

    Here is the design of the pyramid of hatred, designed by the maffioso of the ADL. The master supremacists of victimization are on the very top of the pyramid, and the goy are on all the lower levels.

    Article: https://www.amren.com/news/2022/06/anti-defamation-league-a-compilation-of-information-on-its-political-nature/

  136. anon[216] • Disclaimer says:
    @anarchyst

    I read the comment on monopoly power last week and came to understand the following:
    so many infiltrations.. and such.. ou describe
    what has given certain people their strength is a claim which is a binary.. and the use of monopoly power to make the claim into a reality.
    Binaries divide understandings into opinions and makes the most powerful the great winner.
    Everyone should have an opinion, and no one can change their racial heritage, but everyone can be cop to police and arrest those who acquire or assert monopoly power.. This applies to wealth seeking, to racial division, to giving more to a foreign country, to just about any political issue.

    History shows accumulation and assertion of monopoly power is the responsible party in bring about the changes you have chronicled.

    Monopoly power is the elephant in every room; it is the assertion of that power that must be denied and leveled.
    Humanity needs rules not to outlaw or promote Semite interest, but to outlaw monopoly power that is used to push that assertion into the mainstream.
    It is the assertion of monopoly power that brings about polarized dissent.. but the power is a unary the beneficiary of the monopoly is one side of a binary at the expense of the other side, and
    it is the promotion of binaries, backed by monopoly power, that achieves dividing the masses into manageable groups.

    Monopoly power where it arises should be illegal and punishable as a crime against humanity.

    Anti Semite vs Semite is a binary, but monopoly power that wins the argument is a unary. Learning to identify monopoly power and to beat its use and application down can be much more effective than trying to reason agreement into the members of two sides of the binary; it is much easier to deny the use of monopoly power than it is to resolve a difference neither sides wants resolved. Think about that.

  137. Johan says:

    The Jews attached themselves to the US because the US is powerful and vital. But being powerful is not enough, one national trait of the US, as a young culture (which thus far has not produced any high culture yet), is that it is narcissistic. And it is through attaching itself to this still immature national self-seeking self-love of the US, that the Jews can wreck havoc in the world.

    The combination of the immature self-love of a young culture (US), and all the lack of experience an older culture may have, in combination with the supremacy delusions of the Jew culture, which is also a very experienced old culture, is a deadly combination. It is a vampiric/parasitic relation, the Jew culture being about a corpse, desperately keeping itself alive and enriching itself by sucking vitality from a young and vital host, the US.

  138. @RockaBoatus

    The New Testament indicates that the original Christians were considered heretics by the Rabbis. Prior to the enlightenment, the Rabbis imposed absolute religious purity upon Jewish society. Spinoza narrowly avoided lynching for this reason. I am of the view that Jesus and his disciples were in a similar predicament. Unlike Spinoza, Jesus was not protected by Gentiles, and his disciples had to flee Judea. This all happened before Christianity was even a thing. Christianity proper, started a bit later, and the question is: What did Jews think about early Christianity, (to the extent they even thought about it)? You can quote the Talmud all you want but that only came into existence c. 400 AD when Christianity was fully Gentile controlled. Well, I can easily imagine a bunch of Jewish bishops telling their Gentile flock that they are chosen for salvation and that they have a greater allegiance to the church than to the society they were born in. “All are one in the body of Christ” and so on. The exact same thing happened with the hippy movement. The heavily Jewish leadership was telling impressionable Gentiles to “drop out”, and crapping on ordinary civic virtues. That they (the hippy leadership) might have harboured malevolence toward Gentile society was never spoken of.

    The hippy movement died for a number of reasons. One of the main reasons is that “communism doesn’t work”. No hippy commune that I know of was financially successful. They all surrendered to reality in the end, and whatever ones that survive don’t really follow hippy dogma any more. But imagine that the hippy movement had survived and the Jewish leaders were pushed out. We would be *inundated* with hysterical endless anti-hippy propaganda in the MSM. Laws would be passed banning hippy movements. The army would be sent into hippy communes. This is sort of the relationship of Jews to Christianity. That’s how it started.

    • Replies: @Kapyong
    , @Francis Miville
  139. Lin says:

    The meaning of zionism has evolved:
    –The original: Jews move back to Zion/Israel
    –A later ‘moderate’ form: Diplomatic recognition of Israel–observed by the majority of nations:
    –Unconditional and limitless supports for Israel–practised by Murika
    ……….
    How to become an anti-semite? 2 interesting ways:
    a)Hitler’s original plan actually was deporting the jews back to Zion; so pick up the original version of zionism. Or Hitler was actually a zionist. The hasidic jews I met all said Hitler was jewish; the holocaust was a Cain vs Abel war
    b)Satmar jews, a major hasidic sect, consider the present state of Israel sacrilege against Yahweh.
    https://www.reuters.com/article/us-un-assembly-iran-jews-idUSTRE48O00220080925

  140. @Anon

    Well, I wrote “past any pretensions of age-appropriateness”, not past any age appropriateness. Instead of just trying to disagree and act superior, you might read, and think, more carefully.

    • Replies: @Anon
  141. @anarchyst

    “How can Christians have the same values as the Jews; the very people who denounced and betrayed the founder of Christianity, Jesus Christ,…”
    The Late and Lamented Jay Cee was not “the founder” of Christianity. It was Paul of Taurus. In his “converting” of the heathen Gentles, he promised them eternal life and worried them into thinking world was about to end. The males didn’t have to be circumcised, converts didn’t need to follow Jews dietary “laws”. He had a complete falling out with Peter, James, and John back in Jerusalem, where he was sending money he collected from rich Gentiles by giving them the “good news” of eternal life, He was the money grubbing “televangelist” of his day. He preach to the somewhat moneyed class, whereas the brothers in Jerusalem ministered to the poor. There are 27 books in the New Testament. Only 4 are about Jay Cee.
    Mark, Matthew, Luke and John are the collected stories about the fabled Jay Cee.None of whom were contemporaries. While there is some convergence within the first 3, there are inconsistencies and contradictions. John’s is over the top. The other 24 are about Paul’s travels and travails. I intuit that Preacher Paulie’s falling out with the brothers was nothe not only because foreswore the rites and ritual of Judaism, he was probably skimming of the collections bilked from the the goyim.

    Here’s a good place to get start to get a grip on the truth
    ‘Christ’s Ventriloquists’, The Event That only Christianity – By Eric Zuesse

    • Replies: @Kapyong
  142. Kapyong says:
    @shadowy_figure

    “You can quote the Talmud all you want but that only came into existence c. 400 AD”

    It’s complicated.
    The Talmud has two distinct layers – the earlier Mishnah, followed by the later Gemara.

    The Mishnah is a collection of sayings from Jewish sages, in two largely distinct groups [1] :
    1) From 70 (fall of Jerusalem) to 130 (Bar Kochbah rebellion)
    2) From 135 to ~200

    The two Jewish centres, in Palestine and Babylon, then independently developed commentaries on the Mishnah which came to be called [2] :
    * the Babylonian Talmud, probably finished ~500
    * the Jerusalem Talmud, probably finished ~350

    (The Babylonian Talmud is considered most authoritative, and often called just ‘The Talmud’.)

    New Testament books are extant from the 50s (Paul) and each subsequent decade until the 130s (2 Peter). The Gospels are usually dated in the 70s, 80s, and 90s, although no Christian writer mentions them until early-mid 2nd C., and the first Christian to quote them at length from documents in his possession is Justin Martyr in the 150s. [3]

    Christianity had little power until the 4th century, with persecutions as late as 310. [4]

    The Talmud remained unknown to Christians until 1236 [5]

    So the Talmud’s earliest writings developed around the same time as the Christian writings, long before Christianity became politically powerful.

    “What did Jews think about early Christianity, (to the extent they even thought about it)?”

    Various references in the Talmud are said to be about Jesus, e.g. :

    Sanhedrin 43a describes the trial and execution of a sorcerer named Jesus (Yeshu in Hebrew) and his five disciples (Matthai, Nakai, Nezer, Buni and Todah). The sorcerer is stoned and hanged in Lydda on the Eve of Passover. [6]

    Gittin 56b and 57a relate a story in which Onkelos summons up the spirit of a Yeshu who sought to harm Israel. He describes his punishment in the afterlife as boiling in excrement. [7]

    Various other negative stories can be found in the Talmud and other Jewish documents, but the extent of editing is unclear, and they may not be about Jesus Christ. [8]

    [1] Jacob Neusner, The Mishnah, Introduction.
    [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talmud
    [3] http://www.earlychristianwritings.com/
    [4] J. Stevenson, A New Eusebius, p. 282
    [5] E. Michael Jones, The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit, Ch. 3
    [6] https://www.halakhah.com/sanhedrin/sanhedrin_43.html
    [7] https://www.halakhah.com/gittin/gittin_56.html
    [8] https://www.scribd.com/document/396262615/Jesus-in-the-Talmud-Travers-Herford

  143. apollonian says: • Website
    @Frank Walus

    Christianity Is Philosophy At The Core, Suckers

    Christianity, the core philosophy, is Hegelian anti-thesis to Judaism/Talmudism, as objective (Aristotelian) reality (basis of truth/Christ) is anti-thesis to Jew subjectivism/Satanism founded in “Oral Law Trad.,” later written-out in “Babylonian Talmud,” about 500 AD. Christian affirmation of truth (Gosp. JOHN 14:6) opposes Jew lies (JOHN 8:44).

    Thus, simply as matter of religion, Jews hate Christ (and truth, founded in objective reality), and gloated over his killing (Gosp. MATT 27:25), in much same way as Christians rather hate Satan, that old son-of-a-gun who’s always lying and deceiving. See Talmudical.blogspot.com, Come-and-hear.com, and TruthTellers.org for best Talmudic expo.

    Christians thus celebrate TRUTH which always RESURRECTS, often just when the liars find it soooo inconvenient–the very lesson of the entire New Test. “Don’t lie, sucker, because the truth is gonna come back to bite u.”

    New Test. is LITERATURE–there doesn’t need to have been any real, live, historical “Jesus,” who is mere character in New Test. exactly like Achilles is mere character of the New Test. equivalent for the preceding Greek culture, The Illiad. And New Test. thus merely dramatizes the course and fortunes of truth (and/or anyone who sticks by such truth) which is typically and so often caused to having to suffer so much for such truth–against the wishful thinking and lies of the liars.

    Don’t forget strict philosophy is so difficult for so many, probably 90-95% of the so easily mystified people. That’s why Pontius Pilate asked rhetorically at Gosp. JOHN 18:38, “what the heck IS truth, sucker?”

    Thus “religion” is mere external trappings to core philosophy, these trappings consisting of ceremony, liturgy, prayers, chanting, organ music, stained-glass windows, etc. Religion then makes the philosophy more palatable, popular, understandable, and acceptable to the masses, drawing selected individuals ever-closer to the truth, such as it is, and thus uniting the masses into a collectivist whole upon particular principles–the CHURCH.

    So Christianity is a tremendous, great thing, the very foundation of present Western culture and society, such as it is, carrying on fm the Greeks, in turn the foundation of science and law, the things supporting that industrial civilization which supports the present population of billions of people, etc. Sure, there will always be problems, but Christianity helps sustain that necessary hope that we’ll prevail long as we heed to TRUTH (= Christ), the greatest value, that truth which is the real God to be worshipped, that truth which arises fm an objective reality, etc. Halliluyah, Amen, suckers.

    • Thanks: Kolya Krassotkin
  144. Kapyong says:
    @Shafar Nullifidian

    There are 27 books in the New Testament. Only 4 are about Jay Cee.

    Rubbish.
    Every book in the NT mentions Jesus Christ.

    The other 24 are about Paul’s travels and travails

    Complete and utter bollocks, not to mention faulty maths : 27 -4 = 23, not 24.

    13 books are attributed to Paul (7 considered authentic), and Acts describes his journeys.

    Paul is not even mentioned in : Hebrews, 1,2 &3 John, James, 1 Peter, Jude, or Revelation.

  145. anon[191] • Disclaimer says:

    I find it interesting that writers conclude that they need to deconstruct meaningless words such as “Anti-Semitism,” “racism,” “sexism,” etc. To me, these words conspicuously stand out as being meaningless and undefinable, like the words “freedom” and “liberty.” For example, if a person shared some data with me, and another person said that the data was “this-ism” or “that-ism,” I would immediately understand that the empirical/tangible issue is whether or not the data is correct, not whatever subjective or ad hominem words exist that can be used to denote the data. It’s kind of like one of the first articles I read on “racism” – “What is Racism?” by Thomas Jackson – a long article on the deconstruction of the word “racism.” None of this is complex mathematics, just simple linguistics, and it just seems to me that if our collective cognitive abilities have become so low that we need to spend so much effort trying to explain that these subjective words are meaningless, then this just means that we are collectively just too unintelligent to survive.

    quote:

    [MORE]

    ______________________________________________
    Over the last several decades the have not even pretended to engage in a make-believe Judeophile mimicry; their veneration of Jews is hyperreal, if not surreal, with the existence of the state of Israeli serving as Germany’s stated raison d’état.
    ______________________________________________

    I conjecture that this is indeed all insincere philo-semitism. These ethnically German elites, being extreme sociopaths, fully understand who they need to support in order to be granted the approval to amass large quantities of resources.

    Also, what is illogical about using the word “ideology” to describe National Socialism? National Socialism is an idea, a political model, a social model, or a philosophical model. It empirically makes no difference which of these words one wants to use to describe it. Thus once again, I state that if we collectively have become so unintelligent that using the word “ideology” instead of “social model” or “political model” is enough to confuse or change the opinion of the typical voter, then this to me indicates that we have collectively become too unintelligent to survive.

    Another point is that I never liked the word “Fascism” because it seems to me to be a subjective description, similar to “freedom.” The common use of the word Fascism is used to describe a government that does not support the laws that are endorsed by the Ashkenazim. If a government supports the Ashkenazi system, its nation is described as “Free”; if it does not, it is called “Fascist.” Does this make sense? So, why even ever use either of these two words? Much more descriptive words exist that can be used to describe various political systems.

    Also, I’m not sure if Christianity can be blamed for the fall of Europeans in contemporary times. There is a tendency for evolution to relegate to a state of extinction a population that is innately built to embrace a religion that is not reproductively advantageous. However, throughout most of the last two thousand years, the European tendency to embrace traditional Christianity served them well in the evolutionary sense. What other race can be said to have done as well as the Europeans in the past? Yes, an argument can be made that in some ways, Judaism served the Ashkenazim better in the evolutionary sense than how well Christianity served the Europeans; however in other ways, the Europeans did better than the Ashkenazim, specifically when it came to the evolution of a combination of personality and intellectual traits that gave rise to the ability for mathematics, scientific discovery, technological innovations, and philosophical insight. However, the contemporary fall of ethnic Europeans can be attributed to other factors instead of the modern reformulation of Christianity.

    I find it academically worthwhile to study the actual origins of Christianity, but I see no practical usefulness to attempt to get the European masses to reject Christianity and become atheist. The intelligent races need religion to function as a collective family, which without, they become nihilistic and just engage in hedonism – “living for the moment” – since tomorrow they can die and cease to exist for eternity. Lower races such as Africans may not need religion since they are not smart enough to contemplate about their own existence, the “meaning” of life, and what will come for them the next month. They just live for and enjoy the moment. But the more intelligent races cannot help but think about these things, and if they don’t have religion to give them eternal purpose and meaning, they can’t function as they were evolutionarily designed to, which is to follow a Group Selected and K-Selected model. Thus, it seems to me that instead of trying to convert Europeans into atheists, it would be better to slowly remold the beliefs of Christianity to a more evolutionarily adaptive one. Typical Europeans are not going to engage in deep academic debate about the veracity of the belief system; they will just follow them if told to by trusted leaders.

    Regards,

    Sanjay

  146. anon[191] • Disclaimer says:

    I am wondering why my posts are being hidden by the moderator within the tab/link of [MORE]. Is it because my posts are considered poor quality, or insincere, or off-topic? I would appreciate a response so that I can improve my posts so I can be considered a good poster and worthy of having my posts not hidden within the [MORE] tab. Thank you.

  147. Sarita says:
    @Fiendly Neighbourhood Terrorist

    Oh really? And there are probably 280 million Americans who share the same little story.
    No wonder they got you good.
    (smh).

  148. Anon[291] • Disclaimer says:
    @Carolyn Yeager

    Instead of just trying to disagree and act superior, you might read, and think, more carefully.

    You’re a woman, I don’t have to act superior . . . not my fault you were born a gurl, take it up with your god.

    ;o)

  149. Maud'Dib says:

    “Anti-Semite”- A Wej that does not like you or your opinion

  150. @Wizard of Oz

    As Bernard Lazare, an eminent French Jewish intellectual of the late 19th century, and an early defender of Dreyfuss, observed, Jews had been expelled from scores of countries differing in race, religion, history, social customs etc, over the centuries. Therefore it was only rational to attribute some of the blame at least to ‘Israel’ ie the Jews, itself. Surely you concur with that eminent Jewish figure.

  151. @Wizard of Oz

    Careful Wizz! One of the first injunctions in the Talmud is that goyim who read the Talmud must be killed. Even grovelers like you.

  152. @Wizard of Oz

    One racist Jewish psychopath, and one realist Arab. Even-handed I call that.

  153. @shadowy_figure

    The hippy movement never died out even though it no longer takes the forefront as a mainstream revendication and has lost much of its prophetic momentum. A non-negligible portion of the city’s population still dress as hippies, and dressing as such is no longer resented against as an attack on American-hood but as part and parcel of the multicultural ensemble. Hippy ideas and ideals never went out, they enjoy about the same venerable aura as John Lennon, which contrary to Sinatra or to Woody Guthrie, is still part of the pop repertoire and still enjoys a cult that much outlives that of Lenin. The hippy movement was so to say an ideological soft drug and like all soft drugs its main utility and destiny was to introduce the masses into harder ones. But despite the importance crack cocaine has acquired grass remains on the market and is the process of getting legalized.

    The same thing can be said for hippies : they seems to have gone out of visibility mostly because they have been merging the mainstream and the market dent they opened invited many more enraged movements to come to their jam session. The hippie movement like all pseudo-left, controlled opposition movements of the anglo world, was designed in part by the CIA in part by the British Tavistock institute, starting with Laurel Canyon as a laboratory. The communes lost in great part and those which survived have grown into capitalistic enterprises or even corporations, but so did the kibbutzim of Israel, very few have remained farms entertaining a socialist or communist experience of some sort, many just transformed into private high tech cooperatives but Zionism which it was their role to fan is more alive and well than ever.

    The hippy movement without being suppressed was put on the back burner when it had done its main job, helping install a new paradigm that would divorce so many whites from the heritage of their parents and ancestors as something shameful and also renounce to the ambition of inheriting building a better, richer and juster society with each generation passing as part and parcel of their birthright, in favour of a cyclical view of history and of the Indian social model, the most despairing of all, where you are supposed to believe every generation and the society that will be theirs will grow ever worse and that you should rather vie to form separate communities from your country.

    The hippy movement was right from the start based on an immense egoism rebaptised as self-awareness, its initial communistic outlook must not mistake you : most Puritan sects or early America also started so yet they are at the source of contemporary American anti-social and anti-civic individualism and ideal of a low trust general society. The hippy movement already brewed the dogmas of modern political correctness, where old white men are never to be trusted and seen as the source of all problems in society. Hippies were, by deliberate design, predestined to be become Yuppies, that is to say to cut their hair and don fashion clothes instead, enter the system in the theoretical ambition to better influence society, and the result was class egoism essentially together with the development of the New Age religious galaxy and of cultural marxism.

    • Replies: @shadowy_figure
  154. @anarchyst

    The only people who need growing up are the retards who think they know better than the Church that kept the kikes down for over 1500 years. Funny how when Europeans got arrogant and thought they knew better, the entire West started to decay rapidly.

    • Replies: @shadowy_figure
    , @Anon
  155. @Francis Miville

    I don’t disagree that the hippy movement served a transitional purpose and outlived its usefulness. I certainly don’t buy into the drug-warrior stuff. (i.e. soft drugs as gateway drugs etc.) I wish that the war on drugs had never started. It’s been nothing but a huge annoying distraction and a hobby horse for RINO busy-body’s (like Reagan’s wife), and I have a lot of sympathy for people who are being denied pain medication because of all of the hysteria about drugs.

  156. @HeebHunter

    The only people who need growing up are the retards who think they know better than the Church that kept the kikes down for over 1500 years.

    Funny how when Europeans got arrogant and thought they knew better, the entire West started to decay rapidly.

    European people arrived in Europe 40000 years ago, although light skin arose about 7500 years ago. Christianity arrived in northern Europe in about 1100 AD. That means that for approx 39000 years, Europe was pagan, but then some Europeans (probably abetted by Jews) got arrogant and thought they knew better. Approx 500 years ago the reformation happened and the Jewish holy book (the Old Testament) became central to the faith of many Christians. That was only possible because Christianity had a Jewish origin. If it’s the job of Christianity to resist the Jewish menance, then why does it have a Jewish origin? Why is a Jewish holy book part of it’s scripture? Islam did a better job.

    I’m personally partial to Buddhism, but Buddhism isn’t about toppling other people’s cultures and religions. It just tells you what’s right and what’s wrong, as with the best interpretations of Christianity (and Islam).

    • Replies: @Anon
    , @HeebHunter
  157. Anon[291] • Disclaimer says:
    @HeebHunter

    Funny how when Europeans got arrogant and thought they knew better, the entire West started to decay rapidly.

    Though I have no argument with you in particular, I thought you could trace a beeline between allowing the Spainish Jews to convert to Jewsuitism for the decline of the West.

    On this we can agree, most likely, expulsion doesn’t work – merely transfers the problem.

    I wish someone, somewhere, could formulate a solution that would solve this issue once and for all – ya’ know, something permanent.

  158. Anon[291] • Disclaimer says:
    @shadowy_figure

    European people arrived in Europe 40000 years ago, although light skin arose about 7500 years ago.

    Still going with the ‘We Were All Niggers’ hypothesis, eh?

    Seems like the Jews in Israel ain’t yet got the message, what with their apartheid immigration policies and all.

    • Replies: @shadowy_figure
  159. @Anon

    Still going with the ‘We Were All Niggers’ hypothesis, eh?

    I’m going with the “evolution is real” hypothesis. Whether the out of Africa theory is entirely correct is a different question.

    • Replies: @Anon
  160. @shadowy_figure

    European people arrived in Europe 40000 years ago

    If it’s the job of Christianity to resist the Jewish menace, then why does it have a Jewish origin? Why is a Jewish holy book part of its scripture? Islam did a better job.

    The arrogance seeping through every word!

    Islam did a better job

    True, which is why real Christians will go into homesteading survival mode now, while LARP-Pagans and other “Buddhists” in the West will get flattened by Muslims and Nigger-Spic legions. Well deservingly.

  161. Anon[291] • Disclaimer says:
    @shadowy_figure

    I’m going with the “evolution is real” hypothesis.

    You’re entitled to believe in any fairytale you want, right up there with the theory of ‘grabbity’.

    Checkout Kurt Vonnegut’s Galapagos, see where that gets you with your faith in Jew Science.

    Spoiler Alert: Santa Claus is a joke.

  162. barr says:
    @Wizard of Oz

    “Belal Aldabbour is a Palestinian physician who lives in Gaza. He tweets from there as @Belalmd12. He’s an indispensable eyewitness to Israel’s latest attack on the besieged territory. But even more, he — and others on the internet — are demolishing the latest biased and dishonest reports in the New York Times and other mainstream media outlets.

    Yesterday he tweeted, “Israel is generously (and provokingly) sharing graphic videos of the latest strikes in #Gaza, showing the very last seconds in the lives of the victims. One was lying down. Another was having a phone call.” And he then added, “Israel is going the extra mile to provoke factions in #Gaza. Something reeks here.”

    That “something” is the widespread view that Prime Minister Yair Lapid is instigating the conflict to improve his chances in the upcoming November Israeli elections. Another experienced observer, the writer Ben Ehrenreich, tweeted, “Imprisoning two million people and then bombing them every time you have an election coming up is a profoundly sick political ritual.” The connection between an Israeli election and increased violence against Palestinians is nothing new. This site explained it back in November 2019.” https://mondoweiss.net/2022/08/the-nytimes-hides-why-israel-is-attacking-gaza-prime-minister-lapid-is-running-for-re-election/

    .

    It was anti smetic when Czar used to turn cossacks on the Jews to secure legitimacy or for powe or for distracting attnetion away from his rule.. Aparently Japan was armed to the hilt by Schiff -Jacob going to the whole hog to make sure Russia suffered beyond recovery.

  163. sulu says:

    How to Become an Anti-Semite?

    It’s quite simple really. Just pay attention to what is going on around you and realize it is the Jews that are the ones fucking you. Every Damn Time.

    Sulu

  164. @mocissepvis

    Like the wife beating, cowardly brute whines, as he punches his cowering wife in the face “See what you made do!”

  165. anon[295] • Disclaimer says:
    @Carolyn Yeager

    there is also someone posting as “Andrea Ostov Letania” on Gab, fwiw

    • Replies: @Carolyn Yeager
  166. anon[295] • Disclaimer says:
    @Wizard of Oz

    Don’t you count being kicked out of a country as persecution?

    unless you can prove that it was done for no reason it sounds more likely to have been the consequences for their behavior

    maybe you are joking though?

    if i get pulled over by a cop and given a ticket and a fine for speeding when i was driving 90 mph on the highway i don’t call it persecution

  167. Never again ! Never again !

    https://www.britannica.com/biography/Carl-Schmitt

    The outbreak of war also saw the full implementation of the Nazi Party’s “final solution to the Jewish question” in all areas controlled by the Third Reich. The ultimate goal of the Nazis’ anti-Semitic ideology was nothing less than Vernichtung (“annihilation”) of Europe’s Jewish population.

    It feels good to belong to the Judeo-Christian culture. The Jewish people – the Guardians of Jerusalem – are part of us and we are part of them.

    Iconic photo of Defense Minister Moshe Dayan flanked by Chief of Staff Yitzchak Rabin and Uzi Narkiss taken in the Old City of Jerusalem shortly after its liberation.

    • Troll: anarchyst
  168. @anon

    Well, either Priss Factor is just copying ‘Andrea Ostrov Letania”s comment word for word from another site and putting his name on it OR he uses AOL as a sock puppet. Has to be one or the other, and he goofed up in this instance. Interesting that he’s ignored it. Fits my previously-formed opinion of him.

  169. TGD says:

    Sunic:

    The discussion about his heavenly or his racial origin will likely continue for another millennium. The true believer, however, always knows the right answer. Jesus certainly didn’t carry the facial features of a blond-haired Nordic superhero that we observe on crucifixes of all churches from Manila, Mexico or Munich, nor did he look like Jim Caviezel.

    If Jesus of Nazareth were indeed the offspring of a Jewess and a Germanic centurion named “Pandera” or panther as stated in the Talmud, he may have looked like the half Jew half German 50s movie idol, Tab Hunter.

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
$
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Tom Sunic Comments via RSS
PastClassics
How America was neoconned into World War IV
The “war hero” candidate buried information about POWs left behind in Vietnam.
What Was John McCain's True Wartime Record in Vietnam?
The Shaping Event of Our Modern World
Analyzing the History of a Controversial Movement
The Surprising Elements of Talmudic Judaism