The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 Jose Alberto Nino Archive
How Rabid Zionism Split the Libertarian World
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
Walter Block. Credit: Gage Skidmore/Wikimedia Commons

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
List of Bookmarks

The quiet corridors of libertarian academia echoed with a familiar tension. Beneath the polished language of universal principles, old loyalties and invisible borders stirred once more. What seemed like an argument over ideas was, at its core, a reckoning of identities no theory could contain.

The recent falling out between economist Walter Block and the Ludwig von Mises Institute was not a routine dispute over doctrine. It revealed something far deeper, a reminder that even among those who preach the supremacy of logic and liberty, human nature resists the purity of abstraction. Intellectual movements, however rational they may appear, remain vulnerable to the same ethnic and cultural divisions that have divided men for centuries.

Walter Edward Block embodied this paradox. He emerged from the intellectual heart of Brooklyn’s Jewish community, a world where fierce debate was a form of devotion. Born in 1941 to Abraham and Ruth Block, he began as a socialist idealist and evolved into one of the most uncompromising defenders of anarcho-capitalism.

Block’s conversion began with an encounter that would shape the trajectory of libertarian thought. Attending an Ayn Rand lecture as an undergraduate, followed by meetings with Nathaniel Branden and Leonard Peikoff, he eventually found his intellectual home under Murray Rothbard’s mentorship. This progression from Objectivism to Austrian economics positioned Block as one of the rising Jewish voices in the Austrian school.

His 1976 masterwork Defending the Undefendable established Block as libertarianism’s most provocative voice, willing to defend society’s most marginal figures—prostitutes, blackmailers, and drug dealers— through the rigorous application of property rights theory. The book’s central thesis separated economic analysis from moral judgment, creating a framework that embodied Block’s Jewish character of challenging gentile norms wherever possible.

With over two dozen books and more than 700 scholarly articles, Block constructed an intellectual empire spanning road privatization, water capitalism, and space economics. His positions at institutions such as Baruch College, Holy Cross, and Loyola University New Orleans provided platforms for developing anarcho-capitalism while maintaining respectability within academic circles. Yet beneath this impressive scholarly output lay dormant ethnic loyalties that would eventually surface with explosive consequences.

The October Revelation: Block’s Zionist Awakening

The October 7, 2023 Hamas attacks triggered an ethnic awakening within Block that betrayed his libertarian commitment to non-aggression and a non-interventionist foreign policy. In his Wall Street Journal op-ed he penned with Argentine economist Alan Futerman “The Moral Duty to Destroy Hamas,” Block revealed convictions that had apparently been gestating beneath his libertarian exterior for years.

His call for “total, unrestrictive support” for Israel represented a complete abandonment of libertarian non-interventionism. Block argued that “Hamas needs to be destroyed for the same reason and by the same method that the Nazis were,” explicitly comparing the conflict to World War II’s total war paradigm. This was not merely policy disagreement but a fundamental rejection of the non-aggression principle that forms libertarianism’s cornerstone.

More dramatically, Block’s “Open Letter to the Children of Gaza” revealed depths of ethnic passion that stunned even his closest associates. Addressing Palestinian children directly, he declared that “your parents launched a despicable, unwarranted attack on October 7” while conveniently overlooking the long history of Jewish expropriation of Palestinian lands dating back to the 1880s—a campaign of extermination that the United States government has fully endorsed through its ongoing flow of military aid, economic support, and diplomatic cover. And of course, he didn’t mention Israel’s oppressive control over Gaza—making Gaza into an open-air prison. Who could live like that?

These positions revealed Block not as a consistent libertarian applying universal principles, but as a Jewish intellectual whose ethnic solidarity ultimately trumped philosophical commitments when forced to choose between abstract theory and tribal loyalty.

Hans-Hermann Hoppe: The Libertarian Contrarian Who Stood Up to Block

Standing in stark opposition to Block’s ethnic particularism was Hans-Hermann Hoppe, a German-born philosopher whose contrarian positions place him at odds with virtually every aspect of 20th-century political consensus. Hoppe’s intellectual journey from German academia to American libertarianism produced the most radical critique of democratic governance within the movement, making him perhaps libertarianism’s most polemical voice.

Block’s Wall Street Journal essay, coupled with his longer-running claim that Jewish homesteading and inheritance justify Israel’s territorial rights, put him sharply at odds with libertarians who ground foreign-policy ethics in the non-aggression principle (NAP).

Hoppe answered with a public severing of ties. In his “Open Letter to Walter E. Block,” he charged that Block had revealed himself as “an unhinged, bloodthirsty monster” and that the stance amounted to “a complete and uninhibited rejection and renunciation of the non-aggression principle.” Hoppe’s critique went beyond rhetoric. He proclaimed that Block’s position endorsed collective guilt and “indiscriminate slaughter of innocents,” abandoning methodological individualism.

Institutionally, the fallout was swift and decisive. By 2024, Block was no longer listed as a senior fellow at the Mises Institute, and access to much of his archival writing on affiliated platforms was curtailed. Although not fired in a formal employment sense, his long association with the Institute had effectively ended. Block, for his part, framed his stance as consistent with libertarian property theory and Jewish tradition.

Rather than a purely ideological statement, Block’s pro-Zionist outburst appears to mark an ethnic awakening akin to the one Rabbi Arthur Hertzberg described, wherein the Six-Day War “united American Jews with deep Jewish commitments as they have never been united before, and … evoked such commitments in many Jews who previously seemed untouched by them.”

Hoppe’s sharp rebuke of Block forms only a single episode in a longer saga of intellectual defiance that has rendered him a lightning rod even within libertarian ranks. His 2001 work Democracy: The God That Failed articulates a systematic challenge to democratic legitimacy that extends far beyond typical libertarian anti-statism. Rather than viewing democracy as the least objectionable form of government, Hoppe argues that democratic institutions actively accelerate civilizational decline. His preference for monarchy over democracy places him in direct opposition to fundamental assumptions underlying both liberal and conservative political thought.

Some of Hoppe’s most controversial contributions to libertarian thought also concern his idea of “covenant communities” structured around the notion of “physical removal.” These entities, as he conceives them, would claim an absolute prerogative to exclude those considered misaligned with their norms, effectively transforming property rights into instruments of communal self-definition.

Writing in Democracy: The God That Failed, Hoppe argues that maintaining libertarian social order requires active exclusion of ideological opponents. “There can be no tolerance toward democrats and communists in a libertarian social order. They will have to be physically separated and expelled from society,” he declares, extending this principle to “advocates of alternative, non-family and kin-centered lifestyles such as, for instance, individual hedonism, parasitism, nature-environment worship, homosexuality, or communism.”

Similarly, Hoppe has stirred the pot on the immigration question in contrast to Jewish libertarians like Block who are notorious open borders boosters. Despite describing himself as an anarcho-capitalist who favors abolishing the nation-state, Hoppe supports immigration restrictions, arguing that unlimited immigration constitutes forced integration that violates native peoples’ rights.

The Jewish Intellectual Foundation of Libertarianism

Hoppe’s divergence on immigration highlights how libertarianism’s internal debates often mirror the worldviews of its founding intellectuals, many of whom were Jewish and profoundly shaped the movement’s philosophical trajectory.

It’s no secret that libertarian movement’s development has been profoundly shaped by Jewish intellectual leadership. This pattern extends from the movement’s Austrian School foundations through its contemporary institutional structure.

Ludwig von Mises, whose Austrian School economics provided libertarianism’s theoretical foundation, was born to a Jewish family in what is now Ukraine. His development of praxeology and systematic critique of socialist economics established the intellectual framework that would influence generations of libertarian scholars. Murray Rothbard, perhaps the most influential libertarian theorist of the 20th century, was born to Jewish parents and founded anarcho-capitalism while establishing the Mises Institute. Curiously, Rothbard had more of a populist turn toward the end of his life, where he advocated for a strategy of “right-wing populism” that endorsed the presidential campaigns of David Duke and Pat Buchanan.

Milton Friedman’s Nobel Prize-winning advocacy for free markets brought libertarian ideas to mainstream public attention through works like “Free to Choose,” while his policy proposals for school vouchers and a negative income tax brought libertarian policies into DC think tank circles. Ayn Rand, born Alisa Zinovyevna Rosenbaum to Jewish parents in Russia, developed the philosophy of Objectivism and wrote novels that profoundly shaped libertarian culture despite her rejection of the libertarian label.

In addition to promoting capitalism, Rand and Friedman expressed strong support for Israel, revealing how ethnic identity influences supposedly universal philosophical positions. Rand’s support for Israel proved particularly significant given her influence on free-market thought in the United States. In her 1974 address to West Point cadets, Rand declared her support for “Israel against the Arabs for the very same reason” that she supported American settlers against Native Americans. She argued that “Israel is being attacked for being civilized, and being specifically a technological society” while describing Arabs as representing “centuries of brute stagnation and superstition.”

Rand’s position that America should “give all the help possible to Israel” including “technology and military weapons” represented a clear departure from libertarian non-interventionism that often rejects both direct military intervention and the provision of military aid to belligerents in foreign conflicts. Her justification that Israel represented “the progress of Man’s mind” against “primitive” Arab culture revealed how ethnic solidarity could override Rand’s purported commitment to individual liberties and anti-collectivist thought.

Unsurprisingly, Friedman was also an admirer of the Jewish state. When Friedman visited Israel in 1977, shortly after Menachem Begin’s election, he was invited to advise the new Likud government as it sought to move away from more dirigiste economic policies. His admiration for Israel’s early economic management predated this visit. And like most American Jews, Friedman would look the other way at the plight of the Palestinians facing constant Jewish aggression. Writing in his 1969 Newsweek column, “Invisible Occupation,” Friedman observed during a trip to the West Bank, “Much to my surprise, there was almost no sign of a military presence. … I had no feeling whatsoever of being in occupied territory.” He commended Israel’s “wise policy that involved almost literal laissez-faire in the economic sphere,” concluding that “to a casual observer, the area appears to be prospering.”

With regards to the viability of the Israeli state, Friedman also maintained that “Israel would hardly have been viable without the massive contributions that it received from world Jewry… primarily from the U.S.,” arguing that democratic capitalism, not socialism, made such aid possible: “If these donor countries had been socialist, such support would not have been possible.” Decades later, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu would adopt Friedman’s free-market ideas as the intellectual blueprint for his own reforms. Netanyahu frequently invoked Friedman, saying: “I am very appreciative of the fact that someone I have the utmost respect for, Milton Friedman, said that, when I was finance minister, that finally Israel has a finance minister that believes in and promotes free market ideas.” In 2005, Friedman reciprocated the admiration, praising Netanyahu for recognizing that Israel had long been held back by “rigid government intervention… socialist policies… and unnecessary state ownership of critical means of production.”

* * *

The libertarian movement’s significant Jewish intellectual leadership, combined with theoretical commitment to universalist principles, creates vulnerabilities to ethnic tensions when specific policy questions force choices between abstract philosophy and ethnic solidarity. Regardless of what one thinks about libertarianism, the case of Walter Block’s removal from the Mises Institute highlights the inherently adversarial nature of Jews and non-Jews in political movements. The Block-Hoppe conflict reveals challenges facing intellectual movements with significant Jewish participation. While such movements have witnessed Jewish intellectual contributions, they also become vulnerable to inevitable tensions that arise when Jewish ethnic interests conflict with movement ideology. Block’s passionate Zionism ultimately proved incompatible with libertarian anti-interventionism, leading him to walk away from the intellectual community he had contributed to for over four decades.

Like archaeologists uncovering layers of forgotten civilizations, the Block-Hoppe schism reveals that beneath every high-minded intellectual movement lies the bedrock of tribal identity, waiting to reassert itself when abstract principles collide with the eternal reality of us versus them.

(Republished from The Occidental Observer by permission of author or representative)
 
Hide 217 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. he began as a socialist idealist & evolved into one of the most uncompromising defenders of anarcho-capitalism.

    Lol

    Whether a Jew terms itself a libertarian, conservative, capitalist, anarchist, communist, liberal etc its all meaningless & illusory, because in the end, (despite these specious differences) they’re all united in believing Jews should rule over non-Jews (Zionism).

  2. libertarianism is a cognitive toy jews invented to make sure right-leaning goys keep out of government. consider ayn rand. her background is pure intelligence asset. her aesthetics was neofascism, except it was a denazification program, using the aesthetics of fascism and ideas of fascism to turn it into libertarianism so that it would actually depoliticize would-be fasccists in the west. libertarianism is jsut a way for jews to depoliticize would-be fascists into hating “big government” so they stay the fuck out o f it. no way ayn rand believed in it herself. even used german fonbts the nazis used. obvious recoding going on there. it is a cognitive toy for goyim.

    • Agree: John Trout
    • LOL: Gvaltar
    • Replies: @Miville
    , @Kilmore
    , @JunkyardDog
  3. libertarianism is a cognitive toy jews invented to make sure right-leaning goys keep out of government. consider ayn rand. her background is pure intelligence asset. her aesthetics was neofascism, except it was a denazification program, using the aesthetics of fascism and ideas of fascism to turn it into libertarianism so that it would actually depoliticize would-be fasccists in the west. libertarianism is jsut a way for jews to depoliticize would-be fascists into hating “big government” so they stay the fuck out o f it. no way ayn rand believed in it herself. even used german fonts the nazis used. obvious recoding going on there. it is a cognitive toy for goyim.

    • LOL: Gvaltar
    • Replies: @John Dael
  4. Miville says:
    @Marcion3000

    In English, contrary to the planned language Pandunia (that has banned capitalization), paragraph heads and full stops are never followed with lower-case.

    • Replies: @JudeoSatanism
  5. The Libertarian Party has always been a shill created to siphon votes from Republican candidates. It’s like the Italian beach hotel that hires an 18-years old attractive girl to come down to the beach and strip naked as a way to attract more visitors.

    • Troll: Gvaltar
    • Replies: @Truth Vigilante
  6. Kilmore says:
    @Marcion3000

    On political matters Ayn Rand was no libertarian. She was very much in line with what passes as right-wing / conservative stuff in the U.S., including support for Israel.

    She is much better when she talks about philosophy, if you get over her atheism.

    As for libertarianism, its relation to government has not been so simple. Von Mises was a bureaucrat most of his life, his predecessors were tenured professors appointed by the emperor (I believe). Rothbard took the movement definitely away from corridors of power. However, it seems to have been the right decision in the American context after WW2 because in democratic regimes the majority and voting process make any change toward laissez-faire all but impossible.

  7. Autistic black-and-white thinking (particularly common amongst libertarians) caused Block to call Milton Friedman a literal “socialist”! (Yup, no joke!)

    Also, it is not mentioned here: back many years ago, Block even denied Hoppe being an actual “libertarian” due to Hoppe’s anti-immigration thought.
    (Hoppe, it seems, has “won” this fight, though: as now whom every libertarian denounces it’s Block, although for a complete different reason – Israel.)

    And of course, he didn’t mention Israel’s oppressive control over Gaza—making Gaza into an open-air prison. Who could live like that?

    Maybe he actually did, but I’m not sure: one gotta look deeper, into his recent papers (can be found at “Google Scholar”, for instance) concerning Israel… Block has also, recently, debated on Tom Woods’ YouTube channel (I didn’t watch it) regarding if libertarian thought is compatible with Zionism.

    Anyway, to be fair,
    I always appreciated Block as a thinker, due to him appearing “independent” in my eyes: it is not mentioned here, but Block has written a paper arguing that circumcision is irreconcilable with Freedom; and, to boot, he has written a fascinating paper denying (!) the co-existence of Nuclear Weapons and the Non-Aggression Principle.

    Fun Fact: another libertarian thinker (that, it seems to me, has disappeared from libertarian circles) whom I also appreciate very much due to the beforementioned “independence” is Jason Brennan – Pre-Pandemic he wrote a paper arguing that libertarianism requires a mandatory (!) vaccination policy.

  8. Protogonus says: • Website

    Fast talk (the real issue here) has always been the public face of the Hebrew god of denial, the arbitrary and deadly capricious YHWH. Behind the fast talk it maims and kills through the monetary manipulations adopted by the Hebrews as their main weapon, passing powerfully effective sentences of death in apolitical form:

    https://www.academia.edu/144345497/The_Apolitical_Mechanism_of_World_Domination

    Note that to read the article, simply SCROLL DOWN; no sign-in is necessary. Thanks.

    • Thanks: John Trout
  9. Pythas says:
    @Mr. Crowley

    True Mr. Crowley. But when you look at these kike you like me say to yourself we can beat the living shit out of these kikes…Gee I’m really afraid of michael savage, alan dershowitz, jerry seinfeld, robert kraft, etc. As the saying goes, “Shit, give me a break.”

    • Replies: @JesusWasAGayJew
  10. yep, a race of unfit dysgenic dweebs

    • Replies: @James J. O'Meara
  11. True Blue says:

    It is always hypocrisy and lies.

    All for free speech -when they control it, otherwise it is “antisemitism” or “hate speech” and illegal. Against “racism” when practiced by anyone but them, or their designated proxies empowered to go after the race they loathe. All for open borders -except IsntReal; who alone on earth has an absolute right to discriminate not only against race and creed, but religion too.

    Always lies and hypocrisy, so this comes as no shock.

  12. @Wayne Lusvardi

    Wayne, I’m aware that some of your articles have been published in LewRockwell.com in recent times. And the ones I’ve read were somewhat sensible.
    But you’ve undone the good work with this IDIOTIC comment of yours (if I get around to it, I’ll mention it to Lew Rockwell that he should reconsider posting your articles in future, if you could so stupid as to write something like this):

    The Libertarian Party has always been a shill created to siphon votes from Republican candidates.

    Of course this is incorrect.
    The Libertarian Party came into being because America needed a party that genuinely advocated for:

    1) Small Gubmint and Sound Money
    2) Fiscal and Monetary responsibility
    3) And End to the Fed
    4) The curtailment of America’s murderous foreign policy and …. much more besides.

    Anyone with a brain can see that the Repugnantcan Party is no different to the Democraps.
    Each is controlled by the ZOG overlords and each spends like a drunken sailor – inevitably leading to the collapse of the U.S economy (which is happening right now in real time – as holders of USD dump them and purchase gold in colossal quantities).

    Simply put, the Libertarian Party is the ONLY viable alternative to the Uniparty (because the GOP and Dems are two factions of the SAME ZOG controlled party).
    Wayne, if you had a brain, you’d be encouraging every Republican you know to immediately ABANDON the GOP and instead become lifetime Libertarians – because only the Libertarian movement is platformed on traditional Republican policies (think along the lines of Senator Robert Alphonso Taft – the leading opponent of the New Deal in the Senate from 1939 to 1953).

  13. The author of this article, Jose Alberto Nincompoop, has titled it ‘How Rabid Zionism Split the Libertarian World’.
    Of course the reality is that THERE IS NO SPLIT whatsoever.

    When one thinks of the libertarian movement, one thinks of its thought leaders.
    ie: the likes of Dr Ron Paul and intellectual giants like Hans-Hermann Hoppe.
    The malignant Jew Walter Block is just ONE man among those who claim they’re libertarians.
    Undoubtedly you’ll be able to find other malignant Jews who also claim to be libertarians who also wholeheartedly support the Apartheid Israeli state.

    But these are MOST ASSUREDLY NOT LIBERTARIANS.
    These are people who put their TRIBAL ALLEGIANCE first, and put their political philosophy and morality a distant second.
    The following video titled ‘Libertarians Debate Israel/Palestine: Jacob Hornberger vs. Walter Block’ appeared on the Tom Woods Show 3 weeks ago:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2mCh6rWnej4
    It was a case of libertarian vs ‘pretend’ libertarian.
    And the former (Jacob Hornberger), wiped the floor with the Block-head.
    Importantly, Hornberger is representative of the VAST BULK of those in the libertarian and anarcho-Capitalist movement.

    Although Tom Woods, in the capacity of moderator, tried to be impartial during the debate, he made clear that Walter Block had been OSTRACISED by the libertarian community.
    Everyone was avoiding him like a bad smell – which this hideous hobgoblin evidently is.

    Lastly, Jose Alberto Nincompoop writes:

    The Jewish Intellectual Foundation of Libertarianism

    ….. libertarianism’s internal debates often mirror the worldviews of its founding intellectuals, many of whom were Jewish and profoundly shaped the movement’s philosophical trajectory.

    It’s no secret that libertarian movement’s development has been profoundly shaped by Jewish intellectual leadership.

    I have had this same discussion with several other nitwits who also falsely claimed libertarianism was shaped by Jewish intellectuals.
    Of course this is PATENTLY FALSE – as anyone who’s explored the roots of where libertarianism came from would already know.

    UR readers should click on the link below to a comment I made almost 3 weeks ago, which will enlighten them enormously about the actual FOUNDING FATHERS OF LIBERTARIANISM:
    https://www.unz.com/rpaul/good-news-for-liberty/#comment-7321718

    An excerpt from that comment reads:

    The list below is that of individuals (some of whom would not have attached the word ‘Libertarian’ to themselves – because the term had not yet been invented in their era), but who nevertheless espoused philosophies and foreign (and economic) policy beliefs that aligned word perfect with today’s Ron Paul Libertarianism and could thus be labelled the ‘Founding Fathers of Libertarianism’:

    Adam Smith, John Locke, Thomas Paine, Thomas Jefferson, Frédéric Bastiat, Lysander Spooner, Henry David Thoreau, Alexis de Tocqueville, Carl Menger, Eugen von Böhm-Bawerk, Friedrich von Wieser, Joseph Schumpeter, Friedrich Hayek, Hans-Hermann Hoppe. Lew Rockwell and countless others.

    As you can see, there is NOT a single Jew among them.

    Yes, I’m aware that during the 20th century, the likes of Ludwig Von Mises and Murray Rothbard (both Jews), jumped on the bandwagon and promoted the philosophy of libertarianism.
    And we’re thankful they did. Because these were RIGHTEOUS JEWS.

    In other words, they were NOT part of the Jewish establishment (ie: working in cahoots with the Jewish financiers that controlled then, as they do today, the entirety of the western financial and political systems).
    Von Mises (and especially Rothbard), constantly exposed the malfeasance of the ZOG owned Federal Reserve and how it shackled humanity in indentured servitude and exploited it.

    As pay back the Jewish financiers ensured that Von Mises never was employed gainfully by ANY university or college in the English speaking world.
    Rothbard did not fare much better. The latter deserved to be appointed to head the Economics departments of the premier Ivy League universities in the land.
    Instead, Rothbard could do no better than Economic Professor at the University of Nevada.

    Jose Alberto Nincompoop also writes:

    The libertarian movement’s significant Jewish intellectual leadership, combined with theoretical commitment to universalist principles, creates vulnerabilities to ethnic tensions ….

    This is more B.S from Jose Alberto the Nincompoop.
    When one thinks of libertarianism in the world today, one immediately thinks of Dr Ron Paul.
    The latter is BY FAR the most prominent libertarian in the world in the last three decades.
    Alongside Dr Paul we have the likes of Hans-Hermann Hoppe, Lew Rockwell and Tom Woods PhD, to name just a few.

    And what can we say about the thought leaders of the libertarian movement in recent decades?
    No prizes for guessing that THERE IS NOT A SINGLE JEW IN THE MIX.

    The hideous Quasimodo Walter Block is NOT a libertarian.
    There is NO ‘split’ in the libertarian world.
    Quit lying Mr Jose Alberto Nincompoop. You’re making an ARSE of yourself.

    • Agree: John Trout
    • Thanks: mark green
  14. Wokechoke says:

    Evidence means Obvious in Latin. Although the colloquial meaning of evidence today is more akin to Proof. In modern colloquial English the Obvious generally is used as a synonym for the boring & mundane. The least interesting thing, uttered by a “Captain Obvious”. Richard III was dug up in a parking lot in Leicester, location figured out by little more than a hunch. Practically no evidence but then suddenly here’s the infamous old king in the flesh. The lady who figured it out also thinks that Richard III didn’t murder his nephews. She’s got no proof of course. She’s probably wrong. But she is a fascinating mind.

    I was listening in on Sam Harris recent take on the Kirk assassination. God Almighty he’s become boring. A dull Captain Obvious.

    Was interesting to see how he sneered at the idea of Jews violently getting rid of Kirk (after taking Jewish money and then articulating and platforming Anti Jewish talking points) when we’ve just seen campus purges and Israel blow up pagers all over the Middle East. Given their admitted history of assassinations, Why not one more of a guy who took millions and then suddenly started to bite their hand? No Evidence he’d say.

    Surely the point of some of these talking heads should be to dig a little deeper and find evidence by investigating. The audience of a magician always look at the obvious and ignore the trick being pulled which is often simple if obscured. Charlie “stole” millions off Jews and got it in the neck.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  15. Libertarianism evolved in the late nineteenth century as a way to defuse the growing popularity of socialism and its terrifying, existential threat to the parasitic hoarders of wealth who make their way to the top of human food chains. Both have fundamentally parallel critiques of society’s unfair structuring, but the libertarian solution is to make elected representative government so “limited” that it is robbed of its authority to protect the many from the historically insatiable greed of the few. Instead, this ideology trumpets the magically self-regulating “free market,” the illusion which has proven rather to be the engine that enables the perseverance of oligarchic power to intensify and eventually complete the sabotage of popular democracy.

    • Agree: Kingsmeg
  16. Onebornfree says: • Website

    Block is obviously just another “turncoat”, devoid of any consistent principles, a consistent Jew, I suppose 😏.

    Rand was never a libertarian- she’s on record as consistently hating libertarianism.

    Friedman was no libertarian. The man helped design the WW2 era income withholding tax, fer chrissakes, and later continually promoted the charter school scam, ensuring the future of state control of education.

    Von Mises was a classical liberal, who apparently, in old age admitted that Rothbard was correct in his assertions in his own economic treatises ( eg “Power and Market”) that, in essence, no state at all was infinitely preferable to the “just a little state” that Mises advocated in “Human Action” and elsewhere.

    Ron Paul is a waste of time, as far as I can see. He’s just a warmed-over republican ( ie a gradualist).He does _not_ consistently, day in and day out, advocate an immediate, overnight shrinking of the federal government down to its original limits. ( Yes, I know that the constitution was a scam, as Rothbard pointed out, but at least returning to it would downsized the federal government by around 95%, if only temporarily).

    The only presidential candidate who, to the best of my knowledge, has ever consistently argued for an overnight downsizing of the federal government by 90+% was the great libertarian Harry Browne, who is, these days, consistently (conveniently?) ignored within the “libertarian” community, as far as I can tell.

    “Why Government Doesn’t Work”:

    And so it goes…

    Regards, onebornfree
    Listen to my song”New Revolution( the Harry Browne Song)” at my website

  17. Teilhard says:

    It is striking that so many good minds have bought into a false premise. Zionism is a false construct.

    The Romans forced the Jews out of Judea after the revolt of 132-35. Over the centuries subsequent they traveled here, they traveled there, but they did not go back en masse to what the Romans had renamed Palaestina. Per Howard Sachar, Jews in the Modern World: the Jewish population in and around Jerusalem in the 5th century was 2000. By 1168 the number of ”Jewish families” was 1000. After the expulsion from Spain in 1492 there were 15,000. In 1881 there were 32.000, mainly in Jerusalem, mainly pious Mizrahi Jews, who got along with their Ottoman neighbors. They even wore the fez.

    But Jews were multiplying and prospering elsewhere. A new breed of Jew, the Ashkenazim, genetically distinct and matrilineally European, arose out of the central Rhine Valley around 1200 to 1400. They migrated east and settled in Tsarist Russia. They reproduced there, per Sachar, at “an extraordinary rate.” In1800 they numbered 1million; by 1850, 3.2 million; by 1887, 5.5 million.

    The Slavic landowners at first welcomed them as agents of commerce. But they never assimilated. They became notorious for exploiting peasants, especially via the liquor trade. As well, Jews took notable part in anti-Tsarist activity, including Norodnaya Volya, People’s Will. In March, 1881, Peoples Will assassinated Tsar Alexander II. Pogroms ensued. Jews fled to the west and to Palestine. By 1900 the Jewish population in Palestine reached 57,000.

    In 1896 Theodor Herzl, an assimilated Austrian Jew – he put up a Christmas tree; he named his son Hans and did not have him circumcised – published Der Judenstaat, which argued that Palestine belonged to the Jews and Jews, especially Russian Jews, should go there. And they did. And here we are.

    Zionism is not about a reclaimed patrimony. Jews had scorned their “ancient homeland” for nigh on two millennia. Herzl had even considered Argentina and Kenya as a new Jewish homeland. But Jerusalem had a grip on the Jewish mind, and now they had the numbers and the means, crucially the financial means, to take the territory by force of an incremental invasion, with the Ashkenazim predominant.

    For American Jews, Zionism has replaced Judaism. It is a Godless, tribal enterprise, not unlike Bolshevism, anther movement where Jews played a prominent role. If there is a god for Zionists it is the Jewish people themselves, a massive inversion of an ancient faith, an idolatry of the self. Cue Doctor Freud. No, don’t.

  18. @Truth Vigilante

    I’m very aware of what you write, having been active in the Lib Party in the past. But I am also a trained sociologist. The social function of alternative political parties is to siphon votes at the margin in close races. The Lib Party is not a serious party because they are comprised of all single men, mainly of Jewish background, intellectuals, and mostly from the Knowledge Class, especially high tech, and are irreligious. They will never be appealing to the Working Class or the old or the Evangelical Christian voting block.

    Moreover, American government is, and has always been, an Oligarchy. Candidates are selected not elected in primaries, based on who the donor class wants to support to serve their interests. They create an appearance of a democratic election but effectually it is always one faction of the super wealthy in conflict with another faction (think warring mafia clans). A Libertarian can win support of the oligarchs but they are mere puppets. Libertarians are degenerates in that they don’t bear children so that handicaps them (unless your Obama and borrow someone else’s children). The Lib, independent, and Communist parties exist only to pull votes from Republicans, the Green Party from Democrats. I advocate for the individual, not class, not clan, not tribe, ergo, I lean libertarian with a small l. I appreciate Ayn Rand’s (and Soren Kierkegaard’s) individualism. I want free markets, however, that is again only ideology. Ideology is not the same as social function.

    Presidents and congresspersons are lifetime actors who serve as the puppet mouthpieces for elites. They are like a marionette only with strings attached to every part of the body, fingers, toes, ears, neck, etc., each pulling in opposite directions. They have very little agency or sovereignty. America has been a Free Masonic project from the start by the Puritans of Cromwell, as evidenced by Washington who was the head of a Free Mason lodge and the US dollar bill depicts the all-seeing eye of Masonism. American ideology is quite different however, depicting the founding fathers as Christian, but they were deists. Any US president who has advocated against the fiat dollar and a central bank has been assassinated or attempted assassination. Believe it or not, I am a student of Machiavelli, who is wrongly depicted as a teacher of evil (see my Amazon book review of Leo Strauss’s Thoughts on Machiavelli for a more accurate depiction). However, Machiavelli would be a Neo-Con today as he was always wanting to prepare for wars (not offensive wars).

  19. @Truth Vigilante

    You make some good points: The foundation of Libertarianism is less “Jewish” than anti-Semites claim – although, I think, you overstated it.

    I could make several critiques to your comment, but I’ll only make remark: When you say Rothbard should’ve been an Ivy League Professor – I’ve seen this “delusion” multiple times before; the idea that Libertarianism isn’t highly regarded in Academia because it attacks the powers-that-be, like the Federal Reserve… in truth, Libertarianism doesn’t deserve “high prestige” simply because it’s unsound philosophically.

    Interestingly, I happen to favour libertarian views on Economics – but it’s a mere coincidence: It just happens that Libertarianism, in practice, acts as ‘natural’ IQ-increasing policy i.e. as there’s no Welfare State, amongst other things.

  20. @Truth Vigilante

    I should have added that in the non-ideological world, I worked for the largest water agency in California as chief real estate appraiser. In 2016 when Trump was elected for his first term, I wrote a series of articles online that influenced his administration in establishing federal water policy in California (60% of wholesale water supplies in California come from the Federal Central Valley Project). So, my “libertarianism” if you want to call it that, influenced the Trump administration’s water policies. Agricultural water in California is almost entirely a oligopolist’s monopoly (except for groundwater).

    Moreover, I’m the only water policy analyst who advocated for real water markets for groundwater management. Water markets (selling water in dry years) doesn’t work because water is scarce and thus expensive, so I devised a market of selling water in wet years to store up for dry years and modeled the water market on the gold exchange in Hong Kong.

    I also almost singularly shot down Obama’s Prop. 31 for revenue sharing in California. Revenue sharing was a plan for to rob rich cities and school districts by the poor ones. The Republican Party of Orange County opposed my position against Prop. 31. Howard Kurtz of the National Review magazine stated that if it wasn’t for my series of articles against Prop. 31 it might have passed.

    So, your critique that I am a libertarian ideological apostate is fine, but please don’t question my real world libertarianism.

  21. @Truth Vigilante

    We need a new acronym to comport with RINO – how about LIIO – Libertarian In Ideology Only.

    This acronym might best describe Peter Thiel, the Silicon Valley artificial intelligence magnate. He is pretending to be a libertarian as a cover for the totalitarian AI surveillance.

    Karl Marx, who was a paid propagandist of oligarchs in London, England, to devise the utopian ideology of Communism. Marx came up with an appropriate definition of ideology – an ideational cover for pecuniary interests. That would describe Thiel’s embrace of libertarianism (an end times theological eschatology) that he advocates.

    Totalitarian AI needs a cover ideology and libertarianism is it.

  22. ‘Libertarianism’ is based on the hatred of the other. So, too, is Judaism. The two are virtually congruent with each other. October 7 just gave the Judaic monsters the excuse to drown Gaza in blood, their Holy Fluid.

    • Agree: Wayne Lusvardi
  23. @Wayne Lusvardi

    ‘Markets’??!! Markets are where you buy food and knicknacks. In phony capitalist ‘Markets’ market power is everywhere and always MONEY POWER. If you wanted a proper ‘Free Market’ you’d argue for income and wealth, ie market power, equality, but that is the LAST thing the ‘libertarian’ vermin support.

  24. @Wayne Lusvardi

    ‘Individuals’ are fungible, transient, diverse and cannot live alone. No sane society ever operated on ‘individualism’ alone. The libertarians’ great enemy, other people, are all individuals, too. ‘Individual rights’ extend as far as the rights of others, but ‘libertarians’ despise such restrictions on their ambitions, and utilise every device, from money power to force, to crush the rights of others, then, inevitably, bray their superiority. No wonder it appeals to Judaic supremacists.Block is a particularly blood-thirsty such monster, and probably always was.

    • Agree: Wayne Lusvardi
    • LOL: Gvaltar
  25. @mulga mumblebrain

    I wasn’t aware you did not want a discussion but just wanted to be snarky. You know that markets are part of any libertarian agenda. Markets are choice. Income and wealth? For who? Just the oligarchs and the rest of use must live on a digital stipend? Not very productive discussion.

  26. @mulga mumblebrain

    I agree except I am not that familiar with Block’s writing to criticize it (not him). The individual is a legal fiction. In real life we are all co-dependent. We don’t even know our identity outside of what other people confer on us as an identity, unless there is, perhaps a god that does. Even the most independent person is what others make him. A great leader is so because he has enough charisma to generate followers not because he has some innate leadership trait.

    • Replies: @Jim Richard
  27. John Dael says:
    @Marcion3000

    Zionism is from the pit of hell and demolishes everything in its path.

    http://biblicisminstitute.wordpress.com/judaica/zionism/

    Zionist Israhell killed Charlie Kirk, JFK, JFK Jr, RFK, etc.

    http://biblicisminstitute.wordpress.com/2014/09/18/israels-dark-age-of-terror/

    Zionism has infiltrated the Protestant wings of the Christian faith and is destroying them too.

    https://cufpa.wordpress.com/2018/01/24/deep-zionist-infiltration-of-the-church/

  28. There are three kinds of libertarians.

    The little ‘l’ libertarians who’re into ‘muh liberty’ and ‘muh personal freedoms’. Its message is ‘leave me alone.’ It comes down to ‘I wanna do my drugs, so leave me alone and f*** off.’ The Jeff Spicoli libertarianism.

    The second kind is the constitutional libertarian who generally has conservative values. This type believes that institutions have been corrupted by groupthink and ideological conformism. And he believes the government has grown too big and has merged with the corrupt oligarchic class that rigs the market instead of playing a fair game. It also believes that most people, if left to their own devices of freedom and agency, will opt for conservative values of responsibility and self-restraint. It’s Ron Paul libertarianism.

    The big ‘L’ Libertarians who’re into the Ayn-Randian cult-worship of the Great Individuals as demigods and superheroes. These Libertarians don’t mind if these Great Super-Individuals make all the money, buy up all the politicians, monopolize entire industries, and use their power to shut us down. The winners are great, awesome, and tremendous. As individuals, they’ve proven their superiority and right-to-power. We must kneel at their feet.
    A lot of pro-Zionist Libertarians are in this camp. Some are Jews who believe that their kind deserves to rule cuz they are the smartest and the most awesome. Some are cucks who pee their pants over the fact that Jews earned so much money and won so many Nobel prizes. So, given that Jews are superior individuals, what’s the problem with Israelis killing Palestinians, an inferior form of humans?

    • Replies: @Gvaltar
    , @Chris Moore
  29. It’s sad because Block has for decades written a lot of good books and articles including for the Mises Institute. The sellout is relatively recent, but I’m glad Hans Hope and more recently Jacob Hornberger are not letting Block get away with this.

    Its interesting Block once spoke highly of Ron Unz and wrote briefly at this website. Now recently he has attacked Mr. unz over the JFK Israel conspiracy theory in the most condescending manner.

  30. Israel has an open borders policy much like Germany did 1914-18 and 1938-45

    It paid by losing a third of the territory it started out with

  31. I could have shortened the above article to one sentence:

    Libertarianism fails because “Blood is Thicker than water”.

    Stupid goyim. Libertarianism is nihilism. It is Gnostic.

    Why don’t Europeans uphold their own culture of Arete and Order instead of following Jewish ideology is beyond me. I guess the call of rebellion and anarchy is too beguiling.

    Arete, the Code of Europeans:
    https://gab.com/Clinias/posts/115260738705762678

    You can’t escape from neither God nor Nature that is why your efforts and allegiance to Libertarianism will always fail there, stupid goyim. Libertarianism allows for Jew-rule.

    • Agree: Fumanchu
    • Replies: @Truth Vigilante
  32. @Truth Vigilante

    Truth:
    Why don’t you start with a platform to show libertarianism works at the local level or can work at the local level. The cities of Costa Mesa and Maywood, California for example contract out most of their services. But in California a General Law city has to comply with state mandates for services, while a Chartered city is more independent. Pasadena, California for instance has its own health department, not depending on the County Health Department. This makes a difference when a pandemic is declared. I believe the Mises Institute came out with a similar report which I have somewhere in my library.

    On the state level, I believe North Dakota has its own state bank (and state currency or potential to issue its own currency). That could serve as a model for replacing the Federal Reserve Bank system which is effectually the Bank of London in cahoots with the New York Federal Reserve. If just the Federal Reserve could be eliminated and replaced with state banks and currencies this might be a sector of government that could be libertarianized – read Ellen Brown). Once one sector of the Federal government was reduced or eliminated it would serve as a model for other sectors. Note: the Department of Education is still in business.

    Interesting to note that Pasadena, California with one of the most well financed public library systems have all of their architecturally beautiful buildings shut down because of being overwhelmed by homeless and immigrants. This might be called the “cunning of reason” conceived by Hegel.

    The public is hungry for a libertarian alternative to AI based totalitarian surveillance systems. Sticking to libertarian ideological purity tests won’t address any of this.

    I don’t know, do you think Javier Milei in Argentina is a genuine libertarian or a pretend one? Vaclav Havel was a playwright in former Communist Czechslovakia who became its president once Communism was abandoned as a mere ideology covering for totalitarianism. Havel said one of the characteristics of Communism was its leaders pretended not to be pretending. What has libertarianism to offer more than pretending to not pretend?

  33. Similarly, Hoppe has stirred the pot on the immigration question in contrast to Jewish libertarians like Block who are notorious open borders boosters.

    Does anyone know if Walter Block supports open borders for Israel? If so, he should be universally praised no matter what other positions he holds.

  34. anon[322] • Disclaimer says:

    She (Rand) argued that “Israel is being attacked for being civilized, and being specifically a technological society” while describing Arabs as representing “centuries of brute stagnation and superstition.”

    every accusation is a confession

    • Replies: @James J. O'Meara
  35. @Observator

    the libertarian solution is to make elected representative government so “limited” that it is robbed of its authority to protect the many from the historically insatiable greed of the few.

    Instead, this ideology trumpets the magically self-regulating “free market,” the illusion which has proven rather to be the engine that enables the perseverance of oligarchic power

    Mr Observatory, sometimes you write some sensible things.
    This occasion is most assuredly NOT one of them.
    You’ve made it clear to all with that statement that you’re an Economic Ignoramus par excellence.

    Since when has Gubmint EVER exercised its authority to ‘protect the many from the historically insatiable greed of the few’?
    The number of times that has happened throughout human history can be counted on the fingers of one hand (Hitler’s Third Reich and Russia under Putin being the only examples that come to mind where bountiful prosperity – in view of the starting position both inherited – was bestowed on the vast majority of the populace).
    Doug Casey put it best when he had this to say about ‘Gubmint’:

    The idea that governments are benevolent and wise overlords looking out for the best interests of ‘We The People’, is an ideal that has always been a PERNICIOUS FICTION.

    Because it idealises, sanitises and legitimises an intrinsically evil and destructive institution which is based on force.

    Meanwhile, in the case of unfettered Free Market Capitalism, we have seen that ALWAYS and EVERYWHERE this has been tried (or something approaching it as near as possible), that prosperity abounds.

    However, look at American today, where Free Market Capitalism is no more – a least in the Big End of town.
    THAT is why oligarchic power has greatly increased. The oligarchs have used Big Gubmint to enact all manner of protections to ensure their monopolies are protected.
    This they have done by SUBVERTING the Free Market.

    Mr Observatory, are you that stupid to not be able to see that?
    The U.S today is a Socialist Shit hole – that’s why its fortunes are rapidly waning.
    Today, China is the most Capitalistic of the major economies. That’s why it’s powering ahead.

    The Chinese studied closely what made America great (in the 130 or so years since the founding of the republic up until the creation of the ZOG owned Federal Reserve in 1913).
    And China adopted those policies which have yielded enormous prosperity. ie: China has:

    1) Far Lower income and corporate taxes

    2) Far less of the productive private sector’s money that it has fleeced.
    China has MUCH SMALLER GUBMINT THAN THE U.S as a proportion of GDP

    3) China wasted far less of its GDP on the endless wars, on subsidising the Apartheid Israeli state and its ongoing genocide and funding over 900 bases in over 130 countries (like the U.S does).

    4) With far less money extorted from it citizenry, the Chinese Gubmint wastes far less on unproductive boondoggles. It wastes far less on having to pay the generous wages and lavish retirement perks for the countless millions of unproductive parasites that work in Gubmint.

    5) China has far less Gubmint busy bodies meddling with the productive private sector and thus creates far fewer regulatory road blocks for its business sector than does the U.S (the latter is too busy fucking around with DEI, affirmative action, ensuring there are bathrooms for every subset of the LGBTQ … spectrum of degenerates etc).

    Simply put Mr Observatory, you have NO EFF’N IDEA what policies create genuine self sustaining wealthy economies.
    You’re a typical clueless Socialist (or more likely a Marxist).
    If so, why don’t you emigrate to Mozambique or some other sub-Saharan Marxist ‘utopia’?

    C’mon, I’m serious. Why don’t you walk the walk?

  36. Mark G. says:

    The Objectivists have almost always been rabid Zionists and interventionists. I listen to the podcasts of Objectivist Yaron Brook. He can be quite good on economic issues but is very interventionist on foreign policy, not just in supporting Israel but also supporting Ukraine in its war with Russia.

    This country was largely libertarian for the first 150 years of its existence. Neither Brook or Block follow the largely non-interventionist foreign policy of that era. When we entered WW II and then did not bring the troops home after the war we became an empire. Like all empires of the past we are now entering a decline.

    Hoppe also does not follow the beliefs of the Founders if he believes in monarchy. They thought all governments had to be based on the consent of the governed. There is no self-designated superior individual who has the right to rule over others. Hayek has written about how, if you do set up such a ruling position, it may be the most ruthless and amoral character who will climb his way to power.

    • Replies: @not hoytmonger
  37. @Teilhard

    A new breed of Jew, the Ashkenazim, genetically distinct and matrilineally European, arose out of the central Rhine Valley around 1200 to 1400.

    You are badly misinformed.
    The Ashke-nasty Jews are overwhelming the descendants of the Khazars.
    Listen to the 3 min video below and hear it from Noam Chomsky himself:
    https://rutube.ru/video/fcdc71c373d9bbb196265c90c8334ef9/
    Still not satisfied?
    No problem. Here’s the ever reliable Benjamin Freedman with his take on it:

    Video Link

    Summary: DNA evidence demonstrates that the Ashke-nasty Jews are Khazars.
    There are no ifs and buts about it:
    https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GlLTsgObsAALoID?format=jpg&name=small

    The crap about the ‘Rhineland origin’ of the Aske-nasties is just Jewish misdirection.
    Don’t be a dupe and fall for that easily disprovable nonsense.

    • Thanks: Z-man
    • Replies: @Skeptikal
  38. Mark G. says:
    @Wayne Lusvardi

    “real world libertarianism”

    I always try to look for examples of real world libertarianism. Some libertarian writers like David Friedman or Murray Rothbard point to medieval Iceland or Ireland as examples of successful libertarian societies but a much closer in time example is America up through Coolidge when federal government spending averaged five percent of GDP annually. During this period America became the richest country in history and a large middle class developed for the first time.

    Unfortunately, the only Coolidge type running in the Republican primaries in recent years is Ron Paul. His column gets republished here. Also unfortunately, no large group of intelligent commenters has ever developed in the comment section there. The last two times I was there, one commenter got angry with me when I said our Vietnam War was not a good idea while another kept being evasive about how the medical cartel donating money to politicians is a bribe to get them to use the government to increase doctor incomes using various methods.

    • Agree: Truth Vigilante
    • Thanks: MoT
    • Replies: @John Johnson
  39. Punchthem says:

    Now we see what is behind this high IQ. Intelektualism and chosenism, libertarianism.

  40. “Israel is being attacked for being civilized”

    Not that silly Rand again! Wrong as usual. israel is being criticised for its horrible behaviour.

  41. MoT says:

    I wonder how Rothbard would have handled things after Oct. 7. One thing is certainly clear… You can’t lump all Jews into the same ideological pot about this issue. Now that I’ve discovered that Block has let the mask slip I’m more disappointed than ever. He put forth some very good arguments in the past but it appears now that blood has always been thicker than good sense or even simple decency.

    • Replies: @LavisHoppean
  42. mel belli says:
    @Wayne Lusvardi

    Congratulations, you showed everyone you’re a lunatic with the “borrowed children” thing.

  43. @Truth Vigilante

    Warren Buffet has flat-out said that we are in a gold and silver bubble that will burst “before November 2025”. I disagree. The US dollar is unreliable, but so are Yen, Pound, Euro. I can’t see gold politely fading to below $2,000.

  44. Miro23 says:
    @Observator

    … but the libertarian solution is to make elected representative government so “limited” that it is robbed of its authority to protect the many from the historically insatiable greed of the few. Instead, this ideology trumpets the magically self-regulating “free market,” the illusion which has proven rather to be the engine that enables the perseverance of oligarchic power to intensify and eventually complete the sabotage of popular democracy.

    It seems clear that oligarchic power/profit will push hard to come through any system.

    Libertarianism gives them the ultimate free run – as expressed through the Neo-liberal 1980’s – 90’s. Government is pushed out of the way. Globalist corporations do what they want, where they want – for maximum profits. “Social responsibility” becomes an externality. It’s something for their demeaned government to worry about – the government can clear up the messes.

    Alternatively one can take the less extreme view that there is a role for representative government. It’s the assumption that free market won’t always provide the best result for public. So oligarchs have responded by manipulating elected representatives to obtain the usual result. Get government out of the way – or worse – protect monopolies and facilitate stealing from the public. It’s Special Interest/ Donor politics with 99% of Congressmen accepting the money and patronage.

    Then there’s an operational viewpoint. What form of government has had the most success since 1980 in elevating the general wellbeing of its population and how did they do it?

    The answer is obviously China. They’ve gone from a low-income to a middle-income country. Becoming the world’s leading manufacturing and trading nation. Over the period, GNP growth has averaged 9% annually with life expectancy rising from 67 years to 79 years through rising incomes and general access to low cost effective healthcare. Also universal access to high quality meritocratic education and the world’s best infrastructure. It’s the result of an intense capitalist free-market system without democracy but with elite social responsibility. They have a professional ethnic Chinese elite (selected for ability from a young age) that sets national interest guidelines for the corporate sector in a sort of directed capitalism combined with regional political administration.

    As a example China’s remarkable national high speed rail network (300km/hr+) which is not in itself profitable but was built in the national interest.

    • Replies: @Truth Vigilante
    , @迪路
  45. @Mr. Crowley

    Without their remote controlled golem (Uncle Sap) providing men and material, they are helpless.

    They haven’t “conquered” Gaza (about the size of a county in NJ) because tanks and drones are useless for that purpose. They can blow shit up from long distances but you need infantry to provide cover for the tanks, and the Jews are cowards.

    Imagine Woody Allen, no tank or drone, just a six-shooter. Pathetic. They’d be disarmed quicker than Elisha Cook in The Maltese Falcon.

    They hide behind mooks like Huckabee and Hegseth to look big. Pathetic.

  46. @anon

    while describing Arabs as representing “centuries of brute stagnation and superstition.”

    Well, she wasn’t wrong about that. She probably got that from a brief look at the literature, and that was the standard scholarly opinion. The main issue in the field of Arab or Islamic studies was “what went wrong” or why did the Arab world sink into desuetude for centuries? Apparently some fundamentalist sect gained power, and they entered their own Dark Ages (just as the West did from Constantine to the Renaissance).

    Oddly enough, one dissenter was… Lothrop Stoddard, who wrote a whole book predicting The Rise of Islam.

    The Arab world was no more of a threat to the West than India was to Britain, or Africans to the Boers. What stirred them up was Western meddling, arming them with modern weapons to fight proxy wars (see Spengler on this madness) and then shoving Israel into the mix.

    Once Israel falls, we can go back to peaceful, colonial domination of the primitives.

  47. @Wayne Lusvardi

    The Lib Party is not a serious party because they are comprised of all single men, mainly of Jewish background, intellectuals

    This is NOT TRUE.
    What could be more serious than a party that advocates policies that ACTUALLY WORK, that is able to predict recessions, the subprime Mortgage Meltdown (that precipitated the 2008 GFC) YEARS IN ADVANCE.
    Lusvardi, watch the following 3 min and educate yourself:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ojgBODMioLo
    Even though I’m Australian and even though we’ve done a much better job of keeping the Jewish parasites out of our country (Jews are o.5% of Australia’s population, compared to 2% of the population in the USSA), I’ve been to the U.S on numerous occasions (mostly business related) and have had extensive contact with libertarians in America and elsewhere around the world.
    And the overwhelming bulk of libertarians I’ve encountered are NOT Jewish.

    Not only are they NOT mostly single men, most men that identify as libertarians are married.
    There are also a hell of a lot of women in the party.
    So you’re dead wrong on that score.

    Now Lusvardi, I get it that in that enclave in which you live (Brooklyn NYC or Beverly Hills CA), the place may well be crawling with yids. And thus the Jews you’ve met who claim they’re libertarians (ie: like Walter Block who is NO libertarian in reality), may be a skewed representation of society.

    Secondly Lusvardi, I’ve run across your type many times before in the pages of UR and swatted them down each and every time.
    Your ‘type’ is the sort that criticises libertarianism, yet NEVER HAS THE GUTS TO COME OUT and state what your political philosophy is and what economic positions we should take to cure the ills of America and western society in general.

    This is all the more irksome because THERE HAS BEEN NO LIBERTARIANISM OF SUBSTANCE PRACTISED IN ANY MAJOR COUNTRY for the last 100 years or so.
    So, to the extent that the U.S, Canada or Gross Britain is on the skids and rapidly deteriorating, it’s because GUBMINT GREW LIKE A CANCER and libertarianism was abandoned.

    We’ve had fiscal and monetary profligacy on steroids, we’ve had those endless wars and gazillions in subsidies/cash splashes thrown at Apartheid Israel (ie: the OPPOSITE of libertarianism).
    But still you have the audacity to blame it on the latter.

    Have you no shame man?

    I know your type Lusvardi. You’re part of the cult of Keynesianism, you believe in Bigger and More Bloated Gubmint, you believe in Central Planning and ever more authoritarian tyrannical overlords whose job it is to micromanage every aspect of the lives of the citizenry.

    Well I have news for you my economically illiterate friend.
    That’s all been tried before (the Soviet Union and Mao’s China), and predictably resulted in death, despair and misery.

    Lastly, to the extent that there are some high profile Jewish libertarians in the world today like Dave Smith and Peter Schiff (and by that I mean RON PAUL Libertarians – because that’s the only type of libertarian worth counting, and fortunately this represents the bulk of those that subscribe to this philosophy), these are righteous Jews.

    ie: they are Jews that call out the malfeasance of the ZOG owned Fed and demand that it be abolished. They are (esp. Dave Smith) the type that will vociferously highlight the depravity of Apartheid Israel and its ongoing genocide. They will scream from the rooftops that we urgently need a radical reduction in Gubmint, that we need to be fiscally and monetarily responsible and most of all we need to END THE EFF’N WARS.

    That is at the core of libertarianism – the NON AGGRESSION Principle.
    That said, there’s an old saying: ‘Keep your friends close and your enemies even closer’.
    And to that end the Libertarian Party was long ago infiltrated by ZOG aligned entities.
    A few of whom are Jews and many are just conscience-free gentile foot soldiers of ZOG whose sole task is to destabilise the party.

    They may well be able to furnish proof that they have paid membership of the party.
    But they are most assuredly NOT libertarians.
    (The proof of that is the pro-Covid vaxx woke imbecile that was selected to be the libertarian candidate in the 2024 Presidential election. This is PROOF that subversive elements – ie: malignant Jews – had infiltrated the party.

    So, to cap off what I said before, let’s hear YOUR SOLUTION to America’s economic woes.
    Let’s hear what political party or philosophy* you subscribe to.
    Let’s see if you have the guts to say it. (Because you know I’ll respond with actual examples of where your B.S ‘remedies’ have been applied before and how they had disastrous results).

    Contrast that to countries like the U.S, Canada and Australia, places that for the period from say the late 18th century to the early part of the 20th century, were as close as any nation has ever been in recorded history to being libertarian utopias.
    And what did we find in all three cases?
    That’s right – SPECTACULAR ECONOMIC GROWTH and that wealth lifted nearly all boats.

    In other words that wealth was spread more equitably among a much larger proportion of all socio-economic demographics than in any other societies in history.
    That is the ACTUAL RECORD of libertarianism. We KNOW it works.

    Since FDR wrecked America with his failed ‘New Deal’, and especially under the first Jewish President (LBJ) and his Great Society/Guns and Butter profligacy and explosive growth of Big Gubmint, America abandoned those principles of libertarianism that made her great.
    That’s why the USSA has been proceeding in retrograde motion ever since.

    • Replies: @Wayne Lusvardi
  48. The gentleman seems to have become unhinged.

    And of course his hopscotching over why Israel has these problem because as with Israel, they too seem to think that these issue are born from some bizarre hatred as opposed to a response to Israel’s own egregious conduct in the region.

    I cannot support the 7 October incident but I fully understand the act. Hamas simply cannot afford to engage in acts against civilians — it is in my view strategic folly.

  49. @Wayne Lusvardi

    True; an individual cannot exist, for the most part, without associations with others. But, they are free to choose these associations.

    • Replies: @Wayne Lusvardi
  50. @mulga mumblebrain

    Oh dear. Predictably the resident foaming-at-the-mouth Marxist chimes in with her two shekels worth of input.
    Most UR readers know about Mulga the Mumblers sordid history.
    But for those that don’t, this is the same nitwit that has actually been sucked in by the ZOG conjured (and easily disprovable) Anthropogenic Global Warming Fraud – just as she was sucked in by the lies of the Holohoax.

    This woman Mulga is truly an imbecile of monumental proportions.
    She goes around advocating for more of society’s precious resources to be squandered on those commercially unviable, inefficient and energy-intensive-to-manufacture solar panels.
    She advocates for yet more bird chopping wind turbines and offshore wind turbines that are killing whales and poisoning marine life.

    [MORE]

    But let’s not forget Mulga’s advocacy for the environmentally damaging, massively overpriced, fast depreciating, prone-to-combust lemons – otherwise known as Electric Vehicles (EV’s).
    Well then, let’s get the latest installment on what death traps these EV’s actually are.
    Watch this 6 min video titled ‘No Escape: Tesla DOOR handles KILL man and TWO CHILDREN’:

    Video Link
    The caption below the video reads:

    Every Tesla on the road with these dumb handles should be recalled and retrofitted with a mechanical system to allow access from the outside in the event of a crash.

    And then we have this short video titled ‘Environmentalists finally waking up to DEVASTATION of wind and solar’:

    Video Link
    Stupid is as stupid does.
    And there are none more stupid than the Marxist rabid environmentalists like Mulga.
    (They are actually rapidly destroying the environment and simultaneously impoverishing those poorer demographics with the crushing energy bills ).

    I’m ashamed to say that Mulga is an Aussie.
    She is our version of Forrest Gump – only much, MUCH dumber and less likeable.

    Mulga is a dried up old spinster who, despite her constant advocacy for those EV lemons, refuses to buy one herself.
    This is what we call in our part of the world a GRADE ‘A’ HYPOCRITE.

  51. @wlindsaywheeler

    UR readers should take note that Windsay the Wheeler Dealer is a known extreme left wing moron that advocates for Bigger, Bloated Gubmint.
    He is a known fool and nitwit who I’ve beaten into pulp on numerous occasions in the past.

    That said, we should pay attention to what he says.
    Because he is a known contrarian indicator, the truth is almost invariably the opposite of what he says.
    So in that sense he’s a useful barometer.

  52. Gvaltar says:
    @mulga mumblebrain

    Libertarians want freedom of association. i.e. get to decide who to associate with and who not to associate with.

    • Agree: Mark G.
    • Replies: @Same old same old
  53. Walter Block just exposed his true nature… took off the mask he’d been wearing.

    He was/is a gatekeeper. I dismissed his work.

    There are several at Mises I have doubts about. They never address the elephant in the room… Jewish influence.

    Rothbard, on the other hand, I have respect for. He remained consistent in his philosophy, which was further expanded upon by Hans Herman-Hoppe.

    • Replies: @Bro43rd
  54. chris says:
    @Truth Vigilante

    Yeah, great correction to the article, TV!

    Nino (“nincompoop”; LOL) is also dishonest, citing Friedman from the Chicago school as being very pro Israel, even though the Chicago and Austrian schools are at odds and have always been very separate from each other.

    Then, in order to support his argument at the expense of the truth, he fails to mention von Mises’ student, Hayek received the Nobel equivalent prize for economics.

    As you correctly pointed out, the purging of Block was nothing like the splitting of the “Libertarian World,” it was a lot more like taking out the trash; and the Mises Institute did a wonderful and (in today’s age) very courageous act of housecleaning to get rid of the heretic.

    • Thanks: Truth Vigilante
  55. Gbyut says: • Website

    That a termite like Walter Block can burrow into Catholic schools like Loyola or Holy Cross demonstrates corruption; only a true termite justifies a role for drug dealers and prostitutes.

    It’s not only critters such as Walter Block but in the small town in which I live the priest is from Ghana. Why is a Ghanaian Priest in our White small town? It’s because of termites like Walter Block.

    Obviously it’s not only Catholic institutions but Protestant and secular institutions that are corrupted. If they can’t be cleansed , metaphorically burn them down.

    • Replies: @JudeoSatanism
  56. @Wayne Lusvardi

    Why don’t you start with a platform to show libertarianism works at the local level or can work at the local level.

    There is no need for me to start anything.
    Anyone who is not lazy and has put in a modicum of leg work to read about the application of libertarianism, can see that it has ALWAYS and EVERYWHERE been spectacularly successful.

    Obviously Wayne you’ve been somewhat on the lazy side if you’re not aware of this.
    My suggestion: Click on the link below and watch all the 2000 plus episodes of The Ron Paul Liberty Report:
    https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCkJ1N-7g9Q6n7KnriGit-Ig
    That will get you up to speed in a hurry.
    Meanwhile you also write this:

    On the state level, I believe North Dakota has its own state bank (and state currency or potential to issue its own currency).
    That could serve as a model for replacing the Federal Reserve Bank system which is effectually the Bank of London in cahoots with the New York Federal Reserve.

    Certainly that would be better than what we have now.
    But FAR BETTER would be a situation where there was NO CENTRAL BANK of any description.

    The U.S should return to the Gold Standard immediately and money should be issued by the Treasury.
    And being on a Sound Money standard it will be prudent with the issuance of currency.
    (ie: only issue what it can back in gold).
    (Hence the Gubmint or ZOG controlled Fed can’t print/digitally conjure endless quantities that always end with chronic inflation and steal purchasing power from those least able to afford it).

    And, as Dr Ron Paul advocates, there should be Competing Currencies.
    In other words, the Gubmint has no right to enforce just one currency.
    If the people choose to conduct trade in gold or silver, in some other commodity or in a currency of another nation, the Gubmint should not interfere with the people’s choice.
    You also write:

    Sticking to libertarian ideological purity tests won’t address any of this.

    Wrong again.
    There is NOT single example of anything that isn’t addressed by libertarian ideology.
    Be careful Lusvardi.
    You’re ending up with more egg on your face with every foolish comment you make.

    You also write:

    What has libertarianism to offer more than pretending to not pretend?

    Yet another asinine comment. You’re making a habit of it Lusvardi.
    There is NO pretence in anything the Ron Paul libertarians say or do.
    They provide WORKABLE real world solutions to real world problems.

    I can see that you haven’t studied libertarianism in any depth Wayne.
    Pull your finger out and start doing some actual research of your own. You can start here:
    https://mises-media.s3.amazonaws.com/Man%2C%20Economy%2C%20and%20State%2C%20with%20Power%20and%20Market_2.pdf?file=1&type=document
    It’s Rothbard’s ‘Man, Economy and State’. It’s only 1500 pages long.
    Get back to me in a year after you’ve read it and actually ABSORBED the contents.

    • Replies: @Wayne Lusvardi
  57. This morning National Public Radio featured a guest,New York Times figure, extolling on how such a small Jewish population has placed inordinate influence. An upbeat tone.
    Per usual,the program was not long enough,nor was the host geared to really delve in to matters.

    • Replies: @Paul Greenwood
  58. @Mark G.

    Hoppe also does not follow the beliefs of the Founders if he believes in monarchy.

    The “founders” were the oligarchs of their time. The US Constitution was a coup d’etat and was written to give the general government omnipotent powers… as is evident today. Read the ratification convention notes… especially Virginia, New York and Massachusetts.

    Hans Hermann-Hoppe believes that a monarchy would be better than a representative government because politicians have no skin in the game… they just want to be re-elected to continue their grift.
    He posits that a monarchy would be preferable since the monarch would be handing the reigns of power to their heirs and would be sincerely interested in the state of the kingdom they’re leaving them.

    Representative government allows psychopathic grifters to attain power through special interest groups that promote them in return for political favors… “voters” have no real choice.

    Voting is just giving consent to be ruled.

  59. anonymous[328] • Disclaimer says:

    Blood is thicker than water. You know that. Or did you forget?

  60. Rothbard admirably stood up for the Palestinians.

    Since neither of his great Vienna teachers, Bohm-Bawerk or Wieser, endorsed The Theory of Money and Credit to call Mises and his disciples the Austrian School is probably a stretch.

    Schumpeter said Mises started his own school.

    Schumpeter, who gave credit to rivals (included Keynes in Ten Great Economists), didn’t think much of Mises’ economics. Gave Mises credit for the socialist calculation teaching but otherwise viewed Mises as repackaging old ideas.

    • Replies: @Bro43rd
  61. Libertarianism has always been a Jewish identity, at least as it is practiced in America. It practically worships Ayn Rand as a god. The entire ideology is based upon making the rich more powerful by making corporations more powerful, sidestepping the limits of the Constitution.

    In theory, they should favor personal freedoms, but that’s a smokescreen. They might pay lip service to drugs or free speech, but they also believe corporations should control every aspect of your life and be completely unrestrained from punishing you for anything they choose.

    They also totally lost me at being for open door immigration because that makes labor cheaper.

    As meme-worthy and pathetic as American libertarians are, they’ve generally come the closest to getting what they want, no credit to themselves. I suppose that’s a benefit of your values completely overlapping those of rich kikes.

    • Replies: @Gvaltar
  62. @not hoytmonger

    Representative government allows psychopathic grifters to attain power through special interest groups that promote them in return for political favors… “voters” have no real choice.

    You’re not trying to say this doesn’t happen under monarchies, right? Because there’s thousands of years of history of that happening in monarchies.

  63. @Gvaltar

    That’s great and I agree if we’re talking about a little bakeshop in New York.

    That’s not a right you get if you’re a multinational monopoly pulling all the strings of power.

    The second is what Libertarians actually care about.

  64. @Wayne Lusvardi

    Oh, and one more thing. I forgot to address your question about Javier Milei.
    You know I (like the great Doug Casey), had high hopes for Milei.
    He said all the right things prior to his election. If he kept his promises on even half of the major issues, Argentina was headed for more prosperous times.

    But I thought to myself: WHY would Malignant International Jewry allow libertarianism to succeed in Argentina? After all, if it succeeded there, it would be a template for other countries to follow.
    They would likewise extricate themselves from the orbit of the Jewish financiers that control the entirety of the western financial and political systems.

    You see, Malignant International Jewry hate libertarianism with a passion.
    Libetrtarianism is all about DECENTRALISATION.
    It’s all about secession, of having smaller states and statelets competing for economic freedom.
    Libertarianism is all about claiming your own sovereignty, of having the autonomy to make decisions that are in the best interests of your citizenry.

    Contrast that to the plan of the Jewish financiers. They want CENTRALISATION of POWER.
    They want a One World Gubmint – run by a select Politburo of those chosen from the (((tribe))).

    The goyim will merely be cattle that will be herded and corralled into 15 minute cities.
    They’ll be allocated a cramped dog box apartment, they’ll be allocated a certain carbon footprint, they’ll be herded into Mass Transit (cars will only be for the Jewish party apparatchiks).

    Of course the reality is that ZOG wants NO SUCH OUTCOME of self sovereignty for Argentina.
    It doesn’t want a prosperous Argentina. It wants an impoverished one – one that is dependent on their largesse (ie: ZOG controlled IMF/World Bank/BIS etc), and an Argentina that is willing to dish out appropriate favours to the Talmudic miscreants.

    Anyway, someone in UR asked me the same question about Milei in late 2024.
    In response I told them to click on the link to the following LewRockwell.com article and read it to get a precise idea of my position:
    https://www.lewrockwell.com/2024/06/no_author/a-hoppean-dissection-of-javier-milei/

    Most of the block quoted below is from the article above:

    1) Instead of repudiating State debt, he [Milei] went to the IMF and decided to let the long-suffering Argentinians pay for foreigners and foreign investment funds that had been stupid enough to buy debt obligations issued by previous administrations of the Argentine government.

    2) Instead of slashing taxes all-around as promised and allowing the economy to recover on its own, he has increased various taxes (like on fuels and foreign currency purchases) and even plans to restore a category of income tax.

    3) Instead of abolishing the central bank and allowing a free choice in money as promised, he tries to keep the peso alive—that otherwise would be quickly outcompeted and replaced by the US-dollar (and possibly, later-on, by other still better, more sound currencies)—by means of special short-time bonds, manipulation of interest rates, and artificially fixed exchange rates.

    4) Instead of slashing welfare programs, he has EXPANDED the welfare state—including the multiplied pesos for especially pernicious programs for the social fabric of a good society, like transfers to pregnant women and families for each dependent child.

    5) Instead of ending the war on drugs, he has intensified this abomination and even mocked critics on this.

    6) Instead of balancing the budget by spending less only, he balances it with more taxation rather than with more spending cuts—favouring the accounts of the State over those of the productive people of Argentina.

    7) And instead of promoting and allowing secession and radical political decentralisation, he has strengthened the power of the central government.

    If all that wasn’t bad enough, Milei has aligned himself with the Anglo Zionist empire on all matters foreign policy related, and stated emphatically that Argentina would never sign on to China’s Belt and Road Initiative (as every other sensible country on the planet is doing).

    Summary: ZOG has a vested interest in seeing perpetual economic impoverishment and instability in Argentina.
    To that end ZOG may actively sabotage the Argentine economy and then proclaim to the whole world:
    ‘You see, Libertarianism doesn’t work’.

    This they will do after first making sure that all manner of NON-Libertarian policies are enacted, that Big Gubmint is further expanded and the Free Market is subverted by endless government intervention that hinders growth.
    I’ll end with this from the last paragraph of the article:

    ‘To believe that Hoppe (or his great teacher Rothbard) would ….. endorse Milei’s “libertarianism” is simply ridiculous and ignorant.
    Indeed, to keep calling Milei a libertarian should be considered mistaken, for it means to pass off a neocon as libertarian’.

  65. Che Guava says:
    @Badger Down

    Likely ‘cos you have a heavy investment in gold. Bubbles burst.

  66. Mark G. says:
    @not hoytmonger

    I agree with much of what you say, particularly about some of the Founders promoting oligarchy, especially Hamilton, and how special interest groups help corrupt politicians gain power, resulting in an expansion of government.

    Part of our recent decline, though, is the tendency of countries to become wealthy, with the wealth leading to decadence and the decadence to decline. This has been the case in the past with some non-democratic empires like the Roman Empire, Spanish Empire or British Empire. We are exhibiting all the symptoms of a declining empire.

  67. @Badger Down

    Warren Buffet has flat-out said that we are in a gold and silver bubble that will burst “before November 2025”.

    Buffett does not really believe that.
    He is beholden to the Jewish financiers that run the entirety of the western financial and political systems. And it is in the interests of the Jewish miscreants to not have the price of gold run out of control and head to the moon.

    So they have coerced Buffett to say that – so as not to panic the mindless masses that have the bulk of their net worth in USD denominated assets.
    But the smart money is putting all their dollars in gold, silver and precious metals equities.

    The fact of the matter is that gold bottomed out at around USD $1050/per oz in late 2015.
    Today, less than a decade later gold is around USD $ 4250/oz. In other words:

    The USD HAS LOST MORE THAN 75% OF ITS VALUE vs GOLD in the last decade.

    I recall a journalist once asking Peter Schiff how high gold can go.
    And he replied that the price of gold is inversely related to the VALUE of the USD.
    And the value of the USD is dependent on how many USD are printed/digitally created into existence.

    Well, the ZOG owned Fed is printing/digitally creating USD like a man possessed.
    This will entail that the value* of the USD will go through the floor – hence gold (and silver) will GO TO THE MOON.

    (*NOTE: The ‘value’ of the USD is not what it is vs say the Euro, the yen or the GBP.
    Because all the other nations of the world are debauching their currencies in unison and printing/digitally creating their own currencies with gay abandon).

    The real value of your dollar is what PURCHASING POWER you have.
    And you need only look at your groceery bill each week, the cost of your ultility bills each year, to see that they they are costing you much more each year than the phony Gubmint inflation figures would suggest.

    I’ve said this before in the pages of UR when gold was under $2K per oz, when it was $2500, $ 3000 and so forth:

    Because there is NO FLOOR (and thus no depths) to which the USD will sink, therefore there is NO CEILING to the heights gold will reach.
    Gold will soon enough be $5K /oz (possibly by year end or early next year at the latest), and thereafter it will go to $10K and beyond.
    As gold goes on its merry way into the stratosphere, the days of the USD as world reserve currency will be numbered.

    When the USD loses world reserve currency status (which will happen in the not-too-distant-future), the U.S economy is done for.
    It will sink into the abyss – never to be extricated. Thereafter America becomes a fully fledged banana republic (only it’ll be one with no bananas, but with an abundance of high fructose corn syrup).

    • Agree: Badger Down
  68. @Efficacious

    So what ? Britain ran India with 100,000 men

  69. It appears that the jewish contingent which has comprised the Libertarian sphere is roughly in proportion to the number of jews who spearheaded Bolshevism.

  70. ehjaks says:

    I remember well a speech given by Harry Browne from years ago now, maybe the 1976 election year.

    It was a speech to gain support for his bid to be president.

    The last Libertarian candidate I recall is Gary Johnson, an Arizonan.

    In an interview with Gary Johnson and other candidates, a televised interview, the topic of the situation in Aleppo was discussed. Gary Johnson’s question to the interviewer, “What’s Aleppo?”

    Not everyone is fully informed about geographical locations and names of cities in the world.

    In 2020, a woman by the name of Jo Jorgensen was the Libertarian candidate. Some hope there, maybe.

    Then in 2024, the Libertarian candidate for president is openly gay. Chase Oliver was a big help to get out the Libertarian vote.

    The Libertarian Party is gaining ground on all other parties.

    2020 was the last year I cast a vote for the motley crew of candidates.

    When Trump is on the golf course, the birds stop singing.

  71. Bro43rd says:
    @Badger Down

    Buy any dip, it may be the last chance to get some precious on the cheap.

  72. @Miro23

    Miro, you’ve established yourself as an economic illiterate with this comment:

    China … They’ve gone from a low-income to a middle-income country.
    Becoming the world’s leading manufacturing and trading nation. Over the period, GNP growth has averaged 9% annually ……..It’s the result of an intense capitalist free-market system

    What you’ve said is the OPPOSITE of the truth.
    China under Mao was a hell hole because it SHUNNED Capitalism.
    After Mao’s death, along comes Deng Xiaoping and he embraced Capitalism – and boundless prosperity followed.

    FACT: In the same way that Donald J Chump is a RINO (Republican In Name Only), China is Communist in name only.
    China is BY FAR the most Capitalistic of the major economies.
    The U.S meanwhile has abandoned Capitalism. It is today a Socialist shit-hole**.

    (**At least in the Big End of town. To the extent that the U.S is still semi-functional, this is due to the fact the Capitalism is still working to some extent in the SME – the Small and Medium sized Enterprises sector, where competition exists. And thus a Free Market exists there to a degree).

    No one is in disagreement that today the Jewish oligarchs have entrenched positions, courtesy of the favours bestowed by Big Gubmint, which enables them to retain their monopolies and ensures that they don’t have to work hard to compete for your patronage.

    Under unfettered Free Market Capitalism, where Gubmint is tiny and does not have the capacity to rig the markets for the oligarchs, business must COMPETE FOR YOUR HARD EARNED DOLLAR.
    In other words, if you produce the best quality product at the lowest price, you will INCREASE your market share, Soon enough a particular Captain of Industry will accumulate a large fortune.

    But in no time at all another entrepreneur will come along that is more innovative, that is willing to market his product on a smaller margin of profit. He will simultaneously build a better mouse trap.
    End Result: The Captain of Industry of yesteryear will be KNOCKED OFF HIS PERCH.
    And soon after that another entrepreneur will outdo the last one, followed by another and then another.

    THAT is what Free Market Capitalism is all about. It is about FIERCE COMPETITION.
    There is CONSTANT CHURN. No oligarch is on top of the heap for long.
    One hundred years ago Ford Motor Company was at the top of the heap. Today it is yesterday’s man.

    At the turn of the 21st century, General Electric was the world’s most valuable company in the world by market capitalisation, and Nokia was the world leader in mobile telephony.
    Today both are hollowed out husks of what they once were.
    That is how Capitalism works. Miro, you’re desperately in need of a lesson in economics.
    (And stop listening to the Socialist nitwits that have obviously polluted your mind with claptrap).

  73. @Miville

    The word jew 🤮 must always be written in lower case.
    I think my spell checker is a jew. It keeps correcting me by capitalizing the j word. Their long proboscis is into everything!

  74. Dr. Acula says:

    Great article, Jose Nino is quickly becoming my favorite author on TUR. A well written insight into the world of libertarianism, which I no longer hear anything about.

    It revealed something much deeper, a reminder that even among those who preach the supremacy of logic and freedom, human nature resists the purity of abstraction. Intellectual movements, however rational they may seem, remain susceptible to the same ethnic and cultural divisions that have separated people for centuries.

    This is a perfect explanation of why libertarianism is a joke and will never be applied anywhere. I know because I was one myself for a long time. I have read many books by Rothbard, Mises, Block, Tom Woods, etc. It lives in the abstract and elevates the principle of voluntarism to a pedestal. But it ignores the reality of the world and humanity. People are not individuals, but part of a group. Walter Block is not an individual, but fundamentally a Jew. So he got “mugged by reality,” just like Jewish leftists in the 1960s when the Soviet Union sided with the Arabs and equated Zionism with racism at the UN. Boom, the neocons were born.

    The same is true of October 7. Or why did Bill Ackman, a lifelong Democrat, suddenly join Trump’s team after that? Or Dave Portnoy, who wasn’t even political but now lashes out against antisemites? Or Paul Gottfried who advocated for bombing Iran saying bombing Iran in 2025 is like bombing Nazis in the 1930s. Are these people neocons, as Tucker Carlson would have us believe? Is their status as neocons the problem? Or are they simply fundamental Jews who, at a moment they recognized as critical for the Jewish state, sided with those who promise this state a free hand in crushing its enemies?

    Again, thanks a lot for a very insightful, concise and telling article.

    • Replies: @chris
    , @Truth Vigilante
  75. I gave up on libertarianism when I learned that Ron Paul was afraid to name the jew. He even blocked comments on his live channel critical of jews.
    Then I learned that libertarians even supported miscegenation, the ultimate betrayal of ones race.

    • LOL: RadicalCenter
  76. @Same old same old

    All governments lead to tyranny over time… without exception.

    But imagine getting a document like the Magna Carta signed by the current US government.

    The People have no voice.

  77. Chris Moore says: • Website
    @Priss Factor

    A lot of pro-Zionist Libertarians are in this camp. Some are Jews who believe that their kind deserves to rule cuz they are the smartest and the most awesome. Some are cucks who pee their pants over the fact that Jews earned so much money and won so many Nobel prizes. So, given that Jews are superior individuals, what’s the problem with Israelis killing Palestinians, an inferior form of humans?

    No jew ever “earned” its money. It exists as a parasite on Christendom, which built the civilization in which the jew shark swims. Without Christian Civilization, the jew parasite would be like a beached shark, and it knows this. That’s why the jew parasite has created the illusion for saps, suckers, fools and co-Satanists that Christ is little brother to Big Brother jews, when in fact the historical record shows Christendom has been the most successful civilization in history in terms of keeping these jew parasites and their Judas Class cucks down, out, or dead. Without the ultimate credit card (Federal Reserve international bankster fiat) charging up debt on Christian Civilization’s tab, the jew parasite would be nothing.

    Now the Muslim gangster-parasite is trying to replace the jew and Zionist gangster-parasite because the jew is a pathological divide and rule psychopath who brought them in in droves, and because Christendon got fat, lazy and stupid, and fell for the jew’s Siren call of “muh Globalism…we’ll all get rich!”

    Absent Christendom, the average Ameritard and Euro Clown has cucked itself off to kikes. But they were put in that position by the Anglo Zionist cucks to the Cousinhood, who with the jews created Marxism and the Hollohoax to sucker “liberals” and bitchez and wogs and libertarians and other sappy, sentimental or greedy dummies.

    Parasitic Marxist-Zionism today rules the roost and is shortly going to implode because parasites can’t do anything but grift, jive, thieve, and self-promote. And organize wars. The “verbal” jew is great at jive-talking and selling war on an epic level. This does not make it smart, but clever. And its cleverness has now hit the wall.

    • Replies: @Priss Factor
  78. ariadna says:

    “Block revealed convictions that had apparently been gestating beneath his libertarian exterior for years.”

    His convictions had not been “gestating for years.” They had been passed on to him from day 8, fully formed for more than 2,000n years.

    “Block’s pro-Zionist outburst appears to mark an ethnic awakening”

    No “ethnic awakening.” but rather a coming out, like the self-activation of a sleeper cell programed to kick into action given an appropriate signal.

    “… challenges facing intellectual movements with significant Jewish participation. While such movements have witnessed Jewish intellectual contributions, they also become vulnerable to inevitable tensions that arise when Jewish ethnic interests conflict with movement ideology.”

    There is no political/ideological movement in the Goy world (“left,” “right” or in-between) that is not infiltrated and eventually hijacked from the beginning by Jews. Irrespective of the disguise, Jewish supremacism is at the core.

  79. Z-man says:

    Nino, how old are you? Are you a stupid Spic or what? Right wing, left wing, libertarian, globohomo…whatever, a Jew is always…a Jew. Blood is thicker than mud. Shit, I’ve known this since I was a kid.
    Anarcho capitalism-great tool for the International Jew.

    PS. Fortunately we have righteous Jews like the owner of this site and the cute little lady that puts out all those anti genocide, pro Palestinian videos on F-book.
    From the River to the Sea, Palestine 🇵🇸 will be free. But we have to start by making the world free of Zionism.

    • Replies: @Truth Vigilante
  80. The author fails to mention another Block controversy, his support of Covid lockdowns and related — as I point out here https://stephankinsella.com/2024/05/a-tour-through-walter-blocks-oeuvre/#footnote_0_19134 : For Block’s pro-lockdown and related writings, see Walter Block, “Forced Vaccinations,” LewRockwell.com (Feb. 4, 2013); see also Libertarianism and Compulsory Vaccinations and others listed here. And more recently, Walter Block, “A Libertarian Analysis of the COVID-19 Pandemic,” J. Libertarian Stud. 24 (2020): 206–37. Jeffrey Tucker criticized Walter for some of these views here; a few days later the same program had Walter on to defend his pro-Covid lockdown/mandate views he had expressed at the height of the pandemic lockdown period. Tucker also rightly called out Block for his illiberal and unlibertarian views on infectious diseases, including his bizarre defense of jailing “Typhoid Mary,” in The Downfall of the Gurus. See, e.g., Walter Block, “My Response to Jeffrey Tucker on COVID,” Epoch Times (Feb. 8, 2023; substack version); Jeffrey A. Tucker, “The Downfall of the Gurus,” Epoch Times (Jan. 23, 2023); Block’s appearance online talking about the Typhoid Mary issue. And Walter Block, “Rejoinder to Slenzok on COVID,” J.Libertarian Stud. 25 (1) (2021): 264–68. For the Israel stuff, see Walter E. Block & Alan G. Futerman, “Rejoinder to Hoppe on Israel vs. Hamas,” MEST Journal (2024) which is a response to Hans-Hermann Hoppe, “An Open Letter to Walter E. Block,” LewRockwell.com (Jan. 31, 2024). See also David Gordon and Wanjiru Njoya, “The Classical Liberal Case For Israel,” LewRockwell.com (Feb. 2, 2024; Mises.org version) and Walter’s response, Alan G. Futerman and Walter E. Block, “Rejoinder to Gordon and Njoya on Israel and Libertarianism,” MESTE Journal (Position Paper) (2024).

    • Thanks: chris, Mark G., Truth Vigilante
  81. @Teilhard

    For American Jews, Zionism has replaced Judaism. It is a Godless, tribal enterprise, not unlike Bolshevism, anther movement where Jews played a prominent role. If there is a god for Zionists it is the Jewish people themselves, a massive inversion of an ancient faith, an idolatry of the self. Cue Doctor Freud. No, don’t

    Of this I fully agree.

    • Agree: mark green
    • Replies: @JunkyardDog
  82. @Jim Richard

    We agree that humans are social beings, but like children, they need structure and limits. We all see parents who love their children, to death. Once they have limits, they are angels. Same at the national level.

    • Replies: @Jim Richard
  83. @Marcion3000

    Libertarianism is more than a clever Jewish scheme for keeping goys out of government. In the atomized economy the libertarians envision, a highly organized parasite can feast at will. As EMJ shows in his books, especially Libido Dominandi, Sexual Liberation and Political Control, the radical sexualization promoted by Mises and Rothbard is unarguably a Jewish tool of political control. Pornhub is owned by a rabbi, Solomon Friedman, who openly admits the site is used for identification, fingerprinting, and other data harvesting.

    In Milton Friedman’s comments to Netanyahu cited in the article, keeping the US economically free overrides socialist control since it enables Jews residing in America to transfer great amounts of wealth to Israel. Is that and our military subservience to Isreal the reason they haven’t pulled the plug yet? The leading light of post-Misean libertarianism, Murray Rothbard, advocated every conceivable form of moral indecency, intellectually dressing up the plan to morally anesthetize the goys to their enslavement.

    It’s ironic that so many ill-informed Christians who’re disgusted with the present state of corruption turn to libertarianism when it would be hard to come up with more viciously Christophobic writings than those of Ludwig von Mises. Just a sampling of Mises’s hatred for Christ, Christians, Christianity, and, especially the RCC, appear at the end of the following article, “Ludwig von Mises versus Christ, the Gospel and the Church,” by Christopher Ferrara, blasting Tom Woods for insisting that supposedly values-neutral libertarianism can dictate ethics and morals to the Church:

    https://remnantnewspaper.com/Archives/2010-0215-ferrara-ludwig_von_mises_versus_christ.htm

    • Agree: ariadna
    • Thanks: JudeoSatanism
    • LOL: Bro43rd
    • Replies: @Truth Vigilante
  84. Anonymous[393] • Disclaimer says:
    @Wokechoke

    I was a long time Libertarian (I even ran for Congress as a Libertarian candidate; I went to Libertarian convention; and gave them enough money to qualify as a “life long” Libertarian. Let me sum up characteristics of Libertarians – they are : basically innocent folks caught up in our stupid drug wars :people who inherited money and damned sure didn’t want to share that with the unwashed: and people that wanted to be important but didn’t want to “war” their way through the Democratic or Republican Parties. The Libertarian Party is the “farm” league of politics, and you won’t find a single person of character in it. Every Libertarian with political ambitions wants to be a bona-fide Demo or Repug.

    • Troll: Bro43rd
    • Replies: @QCIC
  85. anon[291] • Disclaimer says:

    size of Government (state, local, and federal):

    3% of GDP – 1776
    6% of GDP – 1912
    42% of GDP – 2024

    • Thanks: Truth Vigilante, Z-man
    • Replies: @chris
  86. If we are talking about the co-opting of movements. You have to consider that all political and social movements are either infiltrated or fabricated as controlled opposition from the start. Whether it’s grassroots / proletariat or bourgeois. Whether it’s a far right militia or left wing movement. Whether it is academia or union, or corporatists. The control encompasses all aspects of the social system and political inclinations. In the end, the neo-feudal corporatocracy is globalist, nation less, apolitical, and amoral. They use all systems as a means to an end and as a mechanism of control — and of division. In fact, that is how they maintain control, by keeping everyone divided in their camp, and distracted with nonsense. In the end there is the neo-feudal corporatocracy corrupting and looting the country —and robbing future generations of a viable future.

    The most useful academics are those working in agriculture and energy and working towards improving sustainability. Every other “security” academic is absolutely useless unless they are pinpointing the real problem and talking about the neo-feudal corporatocracy —and the influence of the powerful lobbies —which are looting and wreaking havoc on the American people —the very motor of the US economy.

  87. During COVID, Block defended the notion of forced vaccinations

  88. @Pythas

    But when you look at these kike you like me say to yourself we can beat the living shit out of these kikes…Gee I’m really afraid of michael savage, alan dershowitz, jerry seinfeld, robert kraft, etc. As the saying goes, “Shit, give me a break.”

    Is this really how you think things work? Christ, what a pathetic whining little bitch you are.

    You think your ability to ‘beat the living shit’ out of someone means you shouldn’t be dominated by them?

    What about Steve Jobs? Or Jeff Bezos? Or Elon Musk? Or Bill Gates?

    History is littered with retarded ‘tough guys’ like you being owned by people less physically imposing but mentally far superior.

    So congratulations, tough guy. You can beat up Jerry Seinfeld. Too bad he’s a billionaire on account of being immensely talented, smart and funny.

    And you’re just a sniveling, retarded little cunt whining on a JEW-OWNED website.

    You can’t make this shit up….lol

    • Replies: @JunkyardDog
    , @ariadna
  89. @Truth Vigilante

    Please stop putting words in my mouth I did not write such as the inference that Ron Paul is a pretender and then calling my comment “asinine”. It does not reflect well on you or libertarianism. And how do you know whether I have read Rothbard or not? Let me ask you a similar question: when was the last time you beat your wife or partner? This is called a conclusionary question and is disallowed in court rooms. I don’t need to disclose what books I have read or not read to meet your qualifications. Requiring a litmus test that everyone who aligns with libertarian party must read Rothbard as their bible is ridiculous and will get nowhere. That is the problem of Libertarians – they are members of the Knowledge Class and view themselves as intellectuals, which relegates them to the basement of less than 1% of voters typically.

    Using Arizona as an example, clearly about 50% of the eligible to vote population are either self-declared independents or non-voters. That is the pool of potential libertarians who are not part of the “matrix” or “Truman Show” trap of the current oligarch political system. And I bet none of them have read Rothbard. And this segment is growing as young families are leaving the city and returning to semi-rural living and a life style of self sufficiency outside the urban areas. What can the libertarian party offer them? Rothbard?

  90. I was wondering why Lew Rockwell (lewrockwell.com) kicked him off the site after years of Block being a key figure of the site. Thanks for letting me know why….but I suspected it was his support for Israel’s genocide of Palestinians….and what lebertarian would support genocide of anyone?

  91. chris says:
    @Dr. Acula

    Or Paul Gottfried who advocated for bombing Iran saying bombing Iran in 2025 is like bombing Nazis in the 1930s.

    Thank, Dr. A (very funny moniker)

    PG was only good in documenting the purge of the alt-right from the conservative movement by the neocons.

    I’m almost shocked at how easily they (he, Block, etc.) are giving themselves away from under the cloak they had been wearing their entire lives.

    They’re desperate to be counted among the righteous and don’t mind being seen as absolute frauds by all their erstwhile friends.

    What a ridiculous way to live, as hidden partisans all the while being someone else from the people they publicly always pretended to be.

    • Replies: @Dr. Acula
  92. @Truth Vigilante

    Ok, this is finally a decent answer to the question I posed to you – can Javier Milei be more than pretentious? But then you resort to putting words in my mouth again I never wrote or even thought. You’re not even good at projecting onto me faults you libel and malign me as having. It’s called cognitive dissonance. You can do better at than in representing libertarianism.

  93. Gerry says:

    ah Crowley don’t soil yourself?

  94. chris says:
    @anon

    Thanks!

    If to the 42% you add the single-customer “private sector” jobs catering mostly or solely to Uncle Sham, you probably end up with something on the order of 60% !

  95. Bro43rd says:
    @not hoytmonger

    Block was solid in his libertarian theory, no need to pooh-pooh his work. But you’re right about the mask. And most of the authors at mises.org are solid, this forum is uniquely positioned to address the JP question (fact) because of Ron’s genetics and sole proprietorship (my theory).

  96. Bro43rd says:
    @SchumpeterDisciple

    With a handle such as yours what else should we expect from you. Certainly not the unbiased truth. Anybody pushing keynes as a great should be understood as a biggov statist no matter what they call themselves.

  97. @Dr. Acula

    Dr Dracula writes:

    This is a perfect explanation of why libertarianism is a joke and will never be applied anywhere.

    Oh my, we have on our hands yet another idiot who’s more than likely a Marxist.
    I’ve unfortunately crossed paths with this moron before – and promptly pummelled him into the turf.

    Dr Dracula, sink your teeth into this comprehensive appraisal of you:
    You’re an intellectual light-weight. Go back to doing what you do best.
    ie: trying to resurrect Maoism in America and fundraising for the RMOA (Rabid Marxists of America).
    Because you’ve embarrassed yourself with your asinine drivel.

  98. Che Guava says:
    @Mr. Crowley

    To the moderators and I expect a reply, it is indecent if no reply is given.

    First post by ‘Aleister’ Crowley yet again? It is bizzare. I make the occasional first post, then it vanishes into a pool of other posts, and mine never comes out first.

    How does this ‘Mr. Crowley’ consistently get first post from the pools you gather?

    Please, don’t be shy, you are giving ‘Mr. Crowley’ first post every time.

    Why is that, really?

  99. @Z-man

    Zionist-man writes:

    Anarcho capitalism-great tool for the International Jew.

    UR readers, be aware that this is the same fuckwit that is found in the WWII UR threads who is chuffed that the Anglo-Zionist empire and Malignant International Jewry emerged as the victors of WWI and II.

    Jews conjured up Jewish Bolshevism, Marxism and the rest.
    Jews hate Capitalism with a passion – you can take that to the bank.
    What they want is a Socialist One World Gubmint.
    Zionist-man will of course deny this.

    But that’s to be expected – because he’s a loyal foot soldier of the small hats.
    This we have established from first hand experience and from how he smears that one great entity that came closest of all to bringing about the demise of ZOG.
    ie: Hitler’s Third Reich.

    Zionist-man, you can run but you can’t hide.
    I will expose you to the UR readership at every opportunity.

    • Replies: @Z-man
  100. chris says:
    @mulga mumblebrain

    Yeah Libertarianism works very well as a guiding principle, a very necessary, but by no means sufficient conditions for creating a healthy society. And all honest Libertarians readily admit that.

    It’s why there are lots of practicing Catholics in the movement, who outside of the freedoms they allow their ideal societies, submit themselves to a hierarchical structure in their religious beliefs.

    I, like many of the commenters here and elsewhere, used to consider myself a libertarian also. However, when I began to consider the pillaging of Russia after the fall of Communism, I realized that Libertarianism had no tools to prevent concerted strategies to disenfranchise entire populations.

    Wether this was a bug or feature of Libertarianism is irrelevant, the fact is that “caveat emptor” is not a viable strategy to preserve a society’s wealth and strategic advantages.

    As despicable as all governments may be, there is no doubt that the one which is entrusted to maintain a society’s advantages is infinitely preferable to the absence of such an entity. This, even if this entity partially bungles its job.

    No, Libertarianism is a great, universal reference system to monitor the inevitable slide of institutions into tyranny but it in no way is a sufficient condition for a successful society.

    It should be used more like a formula for verifying the theoretical solution to a complicated problem, than as the blueprint for creating and maintaining a society.

  101. @JesusWasAGayJew

    What’s not made up and quite funny is your hair-trigger paranoia matched by your grandiosity. Did mommy tell you the only reason the other kids at school hate you is because you’re so much smarter than they are? That it has nothing to do with your nastiness?

    You cite billionaires yet no others on the face of the planet would trade places with them and have to go through life as clinical paranoiacs like the characters on Seinfeld. And, oy vey, anti-Semitism is so bad the poor Jews can’t even make a buck in America, right?

    • Replies: @JesusWasAGayJew
  102. Dr. Acula says:
    @chris

    Thanks, I stole it from Scrubs. The main character is a very goofy M.D.

    I still consider PG to be a very intelligent individual. I have read two of his books and enjoyed both of them. However, it is as Nino writes: ideology stands no chance against nature. Race matters.

    Why do they expose themselves like this and reveal their true identity to the world? Very good question. I believe they can’t help themselves. At least, that’s the impression I get when I follow Ben Shapiro and Andrew Clavan from Daily Wire, Laura Loomer, or others from the tribe. This chutzpah, attacking their enemies without hesitation, which enables their success in the ME, which I very much regret, is also their Achilles’ heel.

    Push them enough and you see their true face. You point it out, and they freak out even more. A death spiral.

    • Replies: @mulga mumblebrain
    , @chris
  103. @Gbyut

    If white Americans want to become victorious again they will have to raise their banners high for MAGA. Make Adolf Great Again.

    • Thanks: rockatansky
    • Replies: @Liza
  104. @JunkyardDog

    Doggie man, what possessed you to write such nonsense like that?
    You’ve made a fool of yourself.

    And, ONCE MORE we have an intellectual light-weight smear libertarianism, while being TOO GUTLESS to tell the UR readership what political philosophy he subscribes too.
    (And of course we know why that is. Because under your strand of politics, which has been tried and proven to be a failure, America degraded at far more rapid pace).

    Contrast that to libertarianism, which America HAS SEEN NONE OF for something like one hundred years or more.
    In other words, to the extent that America is a FAILED STATE today, as most of us would agree, NONE OF IT IS ATTRIBUTABLE TO LIBERTARIANISM.
    Honestly, you really are a stupid cunt if you believe even a small fraction of what you wrote.

    Meanwhile, I just glanced at comment # 86 posted by an Anonymous Nitwit, who writes:

    Libertarian Party is the “farm” league of politics, and you won’t find a single person of character in it

    Really?
    You seem to have forgotten about Dr Ron Paul – who, according to Lew Rockwell, is the Greatest Living American – and who’s going to disagree with that?
    Ron Paul is America’s most outstanding politician in the post JFK era – no one comes close (although another libertarian called Thomas Massie is deserving of some accolades).

    My, my you’ve exposed yourself as a monumental fuckwit.
    I suggest you crawl back into the hole from whence you came, you eff’n retard.

    • Replies: @mulga mumblebrain
    , @JM
  105. ariadna says:
    @JesusWasAGayJew

    ‘Jerry Seinfeld. Too bad he’s a billionaire on account of being immensely talented, smart and funny.’

    Another retarded troll boasting of his stupidity.

    • Agree: Bro43rd
    • Replies: @John Trout
  106. Z-man says:
    @Teilhard

    I’ll have to agree with ‘Truth Vigilante’ about the Kazars, but otherwise thanks for the post. Your last paragraph is a bullseye 🎯. Spread it all over the internet. I know I will.

  107. Nothing is sadder on Unz than the White Nationalist libertarian that rails about left-wing Jewish influence. A truly confused White if there ever was one.

    Gentlemen we must destroy the government! No other option exists! This kind woman Ayn Rand has shown us how to defeat the left. She also says we need to open the borders and legalize crack which sounds a bit odd but I’ll go ahead and back her. I get to call myself a rationalist and feel superior to other Whites. What a deal! Now let’s make fun of those group thinking socialists.

    The Libertarian cult talks Whites into destroying the concept of government they created.

    As with intellectually dishonest conservatives they *just happen* to rely on government failures where Democrats are trying to prop up a race of unknown type.

    They don’t want to talk about how Western society advanced with the help of Roman/Greek foundational government. It’s all post-60s cases where dopey leftist Whites are in a fight with reality.

  108. Look at all these cases of failed liberal programs that assumed race can be fixed through the government. I can list no less than 50 programs.

    The conclusion from this pattern of failure is obvious to anyone.

    Government programs never work.

    – Libertarian Genius

  109. Gentlemen if you drive around Detroit you will see all kinds of buildings in a state of disrepair.

    Most buildings have not held up over time.

    The conclusion is obvious: Modern buildings should be abandoned.

    There is no other explanation. Modern construction techniques are clearly flawed. In fact they appear to have gotten worse since the 60s as seen in cities like Detroit, Baltimore and Gary. With so many examples it is clearly the rationalist position to abandon modern buildings. Fellow Whites, let’s live in tents as we fight the left. That will bring us to victory. Oh and legal crack. Add that in along with late term abortion. Just go with it. You get to call yourself a rationalist.

    – Libertarian Genius

    • Agree: Liza
    • Replies: @Truth Vigilante
  110. @Wayne Lusvardi

    I’m very aware of what you write, having been active in the Lib Party in the past. But I am also a trained sociologist.

    No slots left in Art History or Criminal Justice? I hope at least you were able to find a husband.

    The social function of alternative political parties is to siphon votes at the margin in close races.

    “Social function”? Try saying it this way:
    “The effect of alternative political parties is to siphon votes at the margin in close races.”

    • LOL: acementhead
  111. Bro43rd says:
    @Che Guava

    Could be the lag of moderator, i.e. it appears as there’s no comment when comment(s) are held for moderation.

    Or it could be shenanigans by moderators or Ron himself, we’ll never know for sure. You don’t expect it to be fair, you seem aware.

    • Replies: @Che Guava
  112. @MoT

    There’s no need to wonder. Be it in “War Guilt in the Middle East” or “The Massacre”, Rothbard explicitly and unequivocally denounced Israel. He regarding it as particularly criminal, illegitimate & terroristic even amongst other states.

    • Agree: Truth Vigilante
    • Thanks: MoT
    • Replies: @MoT
  113. Well, having read Block’s EVIL sullage I am currently experiencing that now familiar sensation that flows from contact with spiritual Evil. I first felt it in this case after reading filth penned by Niall Ferguson, the Imperial shit-can carrier, days after October 7. I was actually sickened, and felt an unfamiliar sensation of corporeal revulsion at the sheer wickedness of the garbage, but even Ferguson, whose arse local MSM presstitutes jostle to kiss, pales before this Satanic exposition of raging Judaic hatred. It shows, too, that child murder is CENTRAL to Judaic cultic doctrine, as if we didn’t know that already.

    • Agree: MoT
  114. @Truth Vigilante

    Come on Turd-Block is the perfect ‘libertarian’. Hating others, violent, mendacious, hypocritical-it really is NO surprise that this evil, evil, cult was driven forward by the very worst type of Jew. You’re not ‘Chosen’ yourself, are you? There goes the myth of Jewish ‘intellectual superiority’.

    • Replies: @Truth Vigilante
  115. @Dr. Acula

    That is one type of Jew, but increasingly prevalent. There are monsters of xenophobia, rage, blood-lust in every collective, but Jews have made such horrors into a ‘religion’, not a psychopathology alone. A ‘religion’ where murdering children is seen as a mitzvah, or good deed.

    • Agree: Fenrir_288
    • Replies: @JudeoSatanism
  116. beneath every high-minded intellectual movement lies the bedrock of tribal identity, waiting to reassert itself when abstract principles collide with the eternal reality of us versus them.

    Precisely. Another good example you could have cited is Yaron Brook – a Randroid with an Israeli background -whose professed disdain for government force doesn’t include Israel’s actions.

  117. Your incontinent reply proves you lack impulse control, and doubly so since you offered nothing but insults to counter what I wrote. Calling someone a stupid cunt, fuckwit, and eff’n retard—sure, that’ll do it. Now everyone knows what a man you are, except your lack of impulse control proves otherwise. I recommend you get off playing video games and forget the keyboard.

    • Replies: @JunkyardDog
  118. Anon[226] • Disclaimer says:

    If there was a Mister Universe competition, only not for body-building but for being a sick psychotic fuck, Ehud Barak would be Ahw-nowd.

    https://nypost.com/2025/10/18/us-news/virginia-giuffre-was-left-bloodied-and-beaten-by-prime-minister/

    Actually any Izzie would be Ahw-nowd, if they fielded 100 sick fucks, Izzies would take the first 100 places.

    Now explain this to me please. If Mossad is doing the blackmailing, why are they blackmailing their own consummate in-kike Barak?

    Or, could it be… ? hmm, it’s CIA blackmailing Epstein along with all its other satellite state VIPs? As Epstein bragged, until somebody told him shut the fuck up and kike out, you’re undercover.

    If you ask me, and nobody does, for some reason, CIA is switching to MI-6 for ratfuck goons and dumping their embarrassing Izzie henchmen. The Jewy ψῶζα is just too rank.

    • Replies: @JunkyardDog
  119. chris says:
    @Dr. Acula

    Thanks, I stole it from Scrubs. The main character is a very goofy M.D.

    LOL! Funny even in borrowed from.

    Why do they expose themselves like this and reveal their true identity to the world? … I believe they can’t help themselves.

    Yeah, it’s also that we don’t really count in their world view. Ultimately, it’s just about themselves and their fellow tribesmen. Since they control the narrative any negative observation we make about them, they think they’ll be able to shove down the memory hole, so to speak.

    Push them enough and you see their true face. You point it out, and they freak out even more.

    More reason to persevere! 🙂

  120. @Truth Vigilante

    I know your type Lusvardi. You’re part of the cult of Keynesianism, you believe in Bigger and More Bloated Gubmint, you believe in Central Planning and ever more authoritarian tyrannical overlords whose job it is to micromanage every aspect of the lives of the citizenry.

    You seem to know more about me than myself – are you a BOT? Quit libeling me.

    Libertarians you meet socially are not the same as Lib Party Members. Attend a Lib Party meeting and you will find out.

    I am currently registered as an “independent” no party preference in Arizona USA for the record.

    I was involved in 2024 in the Dr. Shiva for President campaign because I believed a third party movement against both established parties was necessary. I immediately quit when Dr. Shiva disclosed he is a closet Fabian Communist.

    In the past I was involved as a member of the Libertarian Party for about 5 years.

    I single handedly shot down Proposition 31 in California for revenue sharing where rich cities and school districts would have had to share their revenues with poor cities and schools during the Obama administration. I also fought local utility tax in my hometown. But you label me “Keynesian”. What a bunch of crap you write.

    And I worked three jobs and converted family home into an office for rental to take care of my mother in nursing home for 10 years @ $6,000 /month. This kept her off of welfare which I would not apply for.

    And you? What libertarian smaller government accomplishments do you have other than trolling?

  121. @Mark G.

    I always try to look for examples of real world libertarianism. Some libertarian writers like David Friedman or Murray Rothbard point to medieval Iceland or Ireland as examples of successful libertarian societies but a much closer in time example is America up through Coolidge when federal government spending averaged five percent of GDP annually.

    LOL you are the most hilarious walking stereotype of the libertarian White guy. You really can’t ditch the cult, can you?

    Good lord even after the article spells out the flaws of the cult you don’t see the irony of your own words.
    …..but but Libertarian writer Morty Feinbergstein wrote about how a medieval libertarian society may have existed.

    If libertarian politics work so well then why do you need a Jewish atheist to dig up examples for you from the past?

    Rome also existed and they were not only “big government” but created public works that are still not rivaled by modern “libertarian” African countries. Funny that. Those minimal government societies had an extra two thousand years and still no pantheon. Randianologists still have no explanation and like liberals can only gravitate towards trying to control White people from making such observations.

    Tell me, which libertarian founder would you say is your favorite Jewish atheist? Rothbard, Friedman, Rand, Mises? So many to choose from.

    • Replies: @Mark G.
  122. Here is a Jew basically saying,

    ‘Hey goy dumbshits, yes conspiracies are real, and we truly are trying-to-kill-you

    https://robertyoho.substack.com/p/why-is-the-criminal-case-against

  123. Chris Moore says: • Website

    @ John Johnson
    https://www.unz.com/article/how-rabid-zionism-split-the-libertarian-world/#comment-7351011

    The Libertarian cult talks Whites into destroying the concept of government they created… They don’t want to talk about how Western society advanced with the help of Roman/Greek foundational government. It’s all post-60s cases where dopey leftist Whites are in a fight with reality.

    Correct. Bill Guru writes

    Jewish communism in Russia was waning about the same time that Jewish radicalism in the United States was about to accelerate. The 1960’s saw an explosion of leftist radicalism in which the Jewish component was, as Slezkine admits, of almost the same ratio as the Jewish involvement in communism of the 1920’s and the 1930’s. Without the Jews, no 1960’s. Several social scientists of the “decade which changed everything” determined that being Jewish was the single most important factor in predicting radical behavior.

    https://rense.com/general87/century.htm

    And you Neocons and crypto-jews talk Whites into crediting Greco-Roman civilization and jews for making America great when it was actually the quasi-Christian founders practicing quasi-Christian Logos that made the USA a sound concept, but a failed system. Had America’s harder Christian founders insisted upon “No Jews of any shade…Ever!” this country could have gone on into perpetuity. But they were too weak, greedy and compromised by Zionst slavers, and succeeding generations were gradually more and compromised by these organized jews until we ended up where we are today: with ZOG.

    We need to drag the country and the civilization back to Christendom, whether it wants to go or not. Send the kikes to Isra-hell and the wogs to Islamo-land. Let them dream of Zion and the Caliphate from there.

  124. Z-man says:
    @Truth Vigilante

    And I agreed with you about the Kazars, oy vey!
    Seek help or take a lot of drugs.
    I got it! You’re a Spic. ROFL

  125. “Block, for his part, framed his stance as consistent with libertarian property theory and Jewish tradition.”

    Provided Block’s honest, that should read, “Jewish tradition and whatever follows next…”

    Honesty tends to be DOW syndrome byproduct in these cases. It looks human, but…

    Yeah, yeah, I know. Bad me!

    • Replies: @mulga mumblebrain
  126. @John Trout

    Talmudic scholar Michael Hoffman says it’s basically phallic worship of the male Jew.

  127. @JunkyardDog

    A reply to Truth Vigilante that got misplaced, sorry.

  128. ariadna says:
    @Truth Vigilante

    You “had high hopes for Milei because “He said all the right things prior to his election. If he kept his promises on even half of the major issues, Argentina was headed for more prosperous times.”

    Don’t blame him. Blame his dead dogs with whom he said several times he often communicated. They probably led him astray.
    To increase the input of canine wisdom he had one of them cloned at great expense in the US. Unfortunately the unethical clonists who carried out the procedure and delivered the resulting pup to him failed to inform him that a clone is a close replica of the animal cloned, which in this case had been an old dog, so he got an already senile old dog in a pup’s body, with a correspondingly short life span.
    The Argentineans considered these statements innocuous eccentricities, like his unsolicited intimate “sharings” that he practices “tantric sex,” which he was proud to say allows him to ejaculate only once every 6 months. It presumably saves him lots of time to devote to taking about … libertarianism.
    They did not want another Macri or another Fernandez and the Dead Dog Whisperer with Many Wigs was the novelty.
    Argentina’s neighbors are cruel: from the very beginning, watching and listening to Milei made them conclude upon his election that Argentineans deserve Milei.

  129. andyay says:
    @Che Guava

    Mr. Crowley is British. GMT is 5 hours ahead of EST. He has an even greater advantage of 8 hours over PST. This perhaps explains why he appears as the first commenter so often.
    His writing is formulaic, deploying stock phrases and familiar themes ad nauseum and he likely doesn’t think too much before contributing.
    He’s well known to readers at thetruthseeker.co.uk where he posts under several different pseudonyms. The British website’s host, Rixon Stewart has publically accused him of being an intelligence operative, attached to the 77th Brigade.

    • Thanks: Che Guava
    • Replies: @Che Guava
  130. Skeptikal says:
    @Truth Vigilante

    “The crap about the ‘Rhineland origin’ of the Aske-nasties is just Jewish misdirection.”

    They don’t look like Germans, so why should they have ”arisen” in the Rhineland? From what?

    Possibly some of those expelled from Spain ended up in the Rhineland.

    The top tier who had the financial chops ended up in the Low Lands (Netherlands/Antwerp/Amsterdam).

    Bottom line is that no matter how you slice it, they have no claim to Palestine.

    • Replies: @JesusWasAGayJew
  131. Levtraro says:
    @Truth Vigilante

    I could see from a mile that Milei was a neolib posing as anarchocap.

    • Agree: Bro43rd
  132. Liza says:
    @JudeoSatanism

    And how long did Adolf’s greatness last? What’s the point if it is only a few years of economic and social success and then the endless attacks begin.

  133. @ariadna

    Seinfeld jewed his co-actors; he is the only one to receive royalties for reruns of his show.

  134. QCIC says:
    @Anonymous

    So where did you end up, Democrat or Republican?

  135. @Anon

    Remember the Israeli commandos boarding the Mavi Marmara and opening fire on the unarmed passengers? Nine people were killed and it later turned out that the Israeli claim they were fired upon first was bullshit since there wasn’t a single weapon on board. This is what cowards, not commandos, do under pressure—just start shooting anyone they see, unarmed or not. And, wasn’t that the vaunted Israeli “combat insertion” where several Jews had their weapons taken away from them by, basically, unarmed teenagers and immediately dropped into the fetal position crying like sissies for mercy?

  136. @Che Guava

    You know that new articles are posted at a particular time of day don’t you? If not, scoop of vanilla, scoop of chocolate, don’t waste my time. I personally prefer not being first because there’s always some idiot in addition to the author giving me material. Thx, btw.

    • Replies: @Che Guava
  137. ariadna says:
    @John Trout

    and funny thing they were all Jews…

  138. @Teilhard

    If there is a god for Zionists it is the Jewish people themselves

    Yes, and Christians worship a Jew as the embodiment of the Jewish god.

  139. Anon[313] • Disclaimer says:

    Correct, JunkyardDog, Izzies are sniveling cowards. Ukie Nazis are much better henchmen, they’re too stupid to be scared. And Brits are pedos, they’ll do anything for pre-pubescent cherry.

  140. @mulga mumblebrain

    Is it really a religion or is it a JudeoSatanic Cult employing Kabala black Sorcery?
    JudeoSatanists are masters of using words to cast spells. Their near worldwide control of the media enables their word sorcery.
    Evil is Good.
    Good is Evil.

  141. Anon[275] • Disclaimer says:

    More Jew panic! Genocide kike David Tolchinsky censors the IU student paper.

    https://apnews.com/article/indiana-daily-student-ids-censorship-homecoming-6d8f4948c93fb0faaa57ff25b8efb8f9

    Guy who looks like a tapeworm has the parasite’s dream job – shut up goys for kikes.

    Sniveling kikes can’t handle coverage of a film on Palestine. It’s the Midnight Show-locaust!

    Perdue puts it out for them, ha ha suck it raw, kikes! 🔻🔻🔻🔻🔻🔻!

  142. @Mr. Crowley

    a ‘jew’..what the heck is that…Mr Crowley look, there have never been so many of human population that know who you talmudists are, what you stand for, what your pathetic goal is and what your stolen means to achieve it is. We understand it but your inflated egos forbid you the same. We also know you are epigenetical distorted, that you can’t help being molested from day 8 by your beloved rabbinical pedophiles and the hate you have to withstand coming from your twisted sect. We understand all this but very very few accept it ofcourse. And that is your problem, very few can stand your sickness, so either you do something about it, or you leave…if possible our planet

  143. Mark G. says:
    @John Johnson

    “created public works”

    The problem for Rome was not that they built roads and aqueducts. It was their expensive bread and circuses welfare state, their large empire and imperial overstretch and debasement of their currency. We are going the way of Rome.

  144. @Chris Moore

    It exists as a parasite on Christendom

    So, what does it make them? Para-Semites?
    Look fellas, Parasemitism rules the world.

  145. @ariadna

    No honor among thieves or Jews; but I repeat myself.

  146. Funny how people are exposing the crypto jews on here. And even funnier how they try to pass for racist whites. That tells you everything you need to know on how they foment division and hatred to maintain control. Just like InfoWars. As I’ve said before: as long as Americans remain divided and misguided — there’s no chance in hell the jews could lose their insidious grip on power and they know it.

    You jews putting Hitler, Nazis, Fascists on a pedestal and in the limelight are the ultimate quislings. You’ve been doing it forever. It’s been your bread & butter, the very oxygen of your system to create the false opposition (e.g. Hitler) that generates the calamities you create that then provides the pretext and excuse you need to come down on the fake opposition you created like a ton of bricks, which is exactly what you’ve been doing since time immemorial. The more Hitlerism you create the more opposition against jews you create the more reasons you give the jewish-controlled system to impose its worldwide dictatorial despotism on all people.
    There’s no greater and more lethal Hitlerite quislings than jews.

    The jew wants the White Nationalists to pick the path of moral relativism and even immorality. We saw this most recently in Ukraine:

    In 2009-present, Ukraine was targeted by psyops, peddling ultranationalist propaganda, dehumanizing Russians, lionizing Ukrainians.

    In 2014, the authorities in Kiev initiated a systematic attack on the Russian-speaking population.

    The ultranationalists in Ukraine were groomed and led to the slaughterhouse by jews, literally.

  147. @Truth Vigilante

    To what degree does your conventional libertarian platform mesh with “natural libertarian” or a “folkway libertarianism” ethic described below? Does the ideal-type of folkway libertarianism described below even need a new political party?
    Folkway Libertarianism
    1. Self-employment or contract employment or gig employment
    2. Self-help medicine wherever possible or medicine in Mexico
    3. Non-TV social knowledge (also non-biblical)
    4. Familial care of older parents
    5. Home schooling
    6. Familial food-production, fermentation, pressure cooking; food cooperatives
    7. Semi-Rural location living
    8. “Leave me alone” attitude
    9. Auto self-repair
    10. Self-generation of energy wherever economically feasible
    11. Anti-intellectualism
    12. Self-vanity hair and body care and clothing

  148. 迪路 says:
    @Miro23

    In a strict sense, from my perspective as a Chinese, Western-style democracy is fundamentally flawed in its definition.
    The West wrongly presents the political election game as democracy.
    However, this representative democracy actually lacks an effective feedback mechanism. Voters elect representatives, who then formulate policies. If the policies fail, it means that everyone is held responsible, but in reality, it’s as if no one is held responsible at all.
    True democracy is like this. I think the floor tiles on my way to work are very slippery and can easily cause the elderly to fall. So I called a government official and informed them that the ground is very slippery on rainy days and can easily cause the elderly to fall.
    Their staff will come to inspect, assess, implement, and then provide feedback.
    A few days later, I will be asked to rate their actions to reflect their performance.
    Whether their work is good or not will directly be tied to their career advancement in the political arena.
    Of course, we do have some representative democratic electoral systems, but these people are not professionals and can only provide suggestions. The specific implementation is handled by the staff.
    And many of our policy makers formulate policies from an engineering cycle perspective of ten or even twenty years or more. They don’t need to worry about election issues.

    • Replies: @Miro23
  149. @John Johnson

    Jewish John’s Johnson writes:

    Gentlemen if you drive around Detroit you will see all kinds of buildings in a state of disrepair.
    – Libertarian Genius

    Of course we have had NO LIBERTARIAN POLICIES PRACTISED IN THE LAST 100 YEARS OR SO.
    In other words, the non-libertarian policies of the Uniparty (the Dems and GOP are two factions of the SAME ZOG controlled party), have brought this about.

    But the ADL operative JJJ blames it on libertarianism.
    This is the par for the course for this brain-dead vaxxed-to-the-max moron.

    Meanwhile, I recommend that UR readers peruse the state of Detroit when libertarianism was in its halcyon days in the early 20th century. You can begin by clicking on the following article:
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Automotive_industry_in_the_United_States

    From the article:

    Starting with Duryea in 1895, at least 1,900 different companies have been formed, producing over 3,000 makes of American automobiles.

    Did you absorb that UR readers?

    In the U.S alone there were OVER ONE THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED DIFFERENT COMPANIES MANUFACTURING AMERICAN AUTOMOBILES.

    Is it any wonder that the U.S became the Auto manufacturing colossus that it was?
    THAT is Capitalism. Capitalism is all about unfettered FREE TRADE and FIERCE COMPETITION.

    When competition is fierce, all market players MUST work on wafer thin margins, they MUST be efficient (or they’ll end up the way of the dodo), and they MUST provide the best quality product at the lowest price.

    And what was Detroit like in the early part of the 20th century?
    That’s right. It was a bustling city on the rise, a city where the average wage was WELL ABOVE the national average.
    It was a city that AMERICANS ASPIRED TO LIVE IN SO AS TO ENJOY A HIGHER STANDARD OF LIVING.

    THAT my friends, is what Capitalism delivers every time.
    Capitalism was long ago abandoned in Detroit – hence the reason it is today a shit-hole.
    This is America’s ultimate destiny as well, seeing as it has embraced Bloated Big Gubmint and Socialism.

    Summary: There is a REASON that the U.S was victorious in WWII.
    No, it wasn’t the military prowess of the American soldiers in hand to hand combat.
    (Young German boys and war weary old men in the Wehrmacht routinely routed much larger numbers of [better equipped] GI’s in the late stages of the war).

    It was because of America’s unparalleled MANUFACTURING CAPABILITY.
    In 1944 alone the U.S produced nearly ONE HUNDRED THOUSAND military aircraft.
    It was making OVER TWO THOUSAND military planes (fighters, bombers etc) PER EFF’N WEEK during most of 1944.

    The only reason that America never made well in excess of 100K aircraft in that year was because it soon became clear that they had more than enough to win the war – so they tapered off production.

    And one of the main reasons America could make so many planes/tanks/jeeps/50 cal machine guns etc, was because the automobile factories and infrastructure was already there.

    In other words, when war broke out, the auto factories were RETOOLED.
    New jigs were put in place to make Sherman tanks instead of cars, to make B-17 Flying Fortresses instead of Cadillacs.

    Simply put: CAPITALISM WON WWII FOR AMERICA.
    And now seeing as America has adopted Big Gubmint and rabid leftist ideology, SOCIALISM WILL LOSE THE NEXT WAR FOR AMERICA.
    (ie: the economic war – although the U.S is also likely to get one hell of a shellacking on the ground should it decide to launch a ground invasion of Venezuela).

    • Thanks: Mark G.
  150. @Anon

    Just another suppository in quasi-human shape. Smooth, for easier insertion.

    • LOL: Liza
  151. @Daniel Rich

    Murder and genocide are the dead heart and soul of Judaism.

  152. @John Trout

    Lies! Larry and Jerry both get 15% of the show’s syndication profits. It’s because Seinfeld and Larry David were more than just the faces and voices of the show, they were its creators and producers who. This creative control allowed them to negotiate a backend deal that included a 7.5% share of the show’s profits each, which is more or less standard in the television industry.

    As the show gained popularity, Seinfeld and David leveraged their creative control to renegotiate their deals. By the time the show was sold into syndication in 1998 for $1.7 billion, they had each increased their backend share to 15%.

    To date. Seinfeld and David have earned approx $255 million each from the syndication deal alone.

    Over the years, their earnings from various syndication deals, streaming rights, and merchandise earn them between $40 million and $60 million annually.

    In contrast, the main cast members—Alexander, Julia Louis-Dreyfus, and Michael Richards—were not given backend profit participation. Their contracts included high per-episode salaries but did not account for the show’s future syndication success. By the final season, each of the main cast members was reportedly earning around $600,000 per episode which was way higher than the industry average but still a fraction of what Seinfeld and David were raking I from backend profits.

    The main cast did attempt to negotiate a share of the syndication profits in season 8 & 9, but the studio were greedy assholes and left them with residuals from reruns and DVD sales as their primary source of ongoing income. These residuals gave each of them approximately $250k since Seinfeld stopped filming in 1997. That’s a little more that 10k/year — not bad for some of TV’s most recognized faces!

    In a 2024 interview, Alexander mentioned that the cast’s decision to negotiate higher salaries during the show’s peak might have inadvertently “killed the television industry”. He noted that their $1 million per episode deal set a precedent, leading other actors to demand similar pay, which he felt contributed to the rising costs of television production and the decline in quality

    https://www.slashfilm.com/1693315/jason-alexander-seinfeld-cast-killed-television/

  153. @mulga mumblebrain

    Mulga, that stupid comment of yours has earned you this treat:

    [MORE]

    Click on the link below and listen to the audio from 1:05:30-1:17:00, as the great Irishman Richie Allen pummels yet another Klimate Kook (peddling the standard fare of Climate Alarmism), into the turf:
    https://www.podomatic.com/podcasts/richieallen/episodes/2025-10-16T11_01_43-07_00

    For UR readers not familiar with Richie Allen, he’s a pro-union lifelong Socialist – so this is not a case of me cherry picking a right wing ideologue.

    But unlike other leftist nitwits, Richie is a CRITICAL THINKER.
    He doesn’t blindly accept the narrative being peddled by the ZOG owned western MSM on matters like the alleged Global Warming, the Holohoax, the Covid Psyop* (like the dried up old spinster Mulga does).

    (*Yes readers, the silly cow Mulga did take the Covid vaxx – hence the reason for the neurologocal impairment as the spike proteins accumulate in her brain and her shrivelled up ovaries).

    Richie Allen thoroughly investigated the actual scientific evidence and came to the inescapable conclusion that Anthropogenic (ie: man-made) Global Warming was a hoax conjured up by Malignant International Jewry.

    UR readers, did you notice how Mulga used projection to claim I’m one of the (((tribe)))?
    This is a time honoured Jewish trick. ie: to accuse others of what they are guilty of.
    Yes readers, Mulga is not just a dried up old spinster, she is likely a hideous hobgoblin Jewess.
    That explains why she naturally covers for the AGW hoax.

    And that also explains why she keeps saying that millions of yids died in the Holohoax – when John Wear, Ron Unz and countless others have demonstrated in the UR WWII threads that:
    THERE WERE NO GAS CHAMBERS for killing humans IN ANY OF THE GERMAN SUPERVISED WORK CAMPS (which were falsely labelled as extermination centres) DURING WWII.

    Moreover there was NO SYSTEMATIC (or even small scale) DELIBERATE EXTERMINATION PROGRAMME CONDUCTED BY THE GERMANS AGAINST JEWS OR ANY OTHER ETHNIC MINORITY – either before or during WWII.

  154. JM says:
    @Truth Vigilante

    Many years’ ago, Brother Kapner developed, to my lights, a convincing critique of Ron Paul’s Libertarian “solutions’ for the stymied American economy.

    Here is one of his contributions, one I posted in a discussion on another site to mainly Jewish leftists, at least one of some intelligence and openness, a dozen years’ ago:

    [MORE]

    http://www.realjewnews.com/?p=858

    Ron Paul’s Gold Standard Nightmare
    By Brother Nathanael Kapner
    Copyright 2013

    Monetary reform is the mother of all reforms. Without it, no other reform will work.

    Ron Paul agrees. The problem is his solutions. They serve the private banks.

    Citing former World Bank head, Robert Zoelleck, now Goldman Sachs’ Chairman of International Affairs, Ron Paul wants monetary reform to revolve around gold.

    [Clip: “Reforms have to come…They’re already talking about it. When you see Robert Zoelleck talking about monetary reforms and talking about gold, our time has come for serious discussion on monetary reform.”]

    Ron Paul’s program is to implement the gold standard.

    This means you could walk into any bank and exchange your dollars for gold. We already have this with private bullion banks.

    But Ron Paul wants to extend the gold standard to US dollars and have the Treasury supply the gold…that is, if they have any.

    In his “End The Fed,” Paul says the government’s gold stock should guarantee the dollar. He wants to freeze the current stock of dollars and then use “money saved” as a basis for credit.

    Yet most “money saved” is in the hands of the Jewish bankers who own the Fed. Americans don’t have any savings. Ron Paul thus locks in this Jewish bankers’ advantage.

    And did you know that Ron Paul’s favorite period in American history is the “Long Depression” that lasted from the end of the Civil War to 1886?

    The money supply shrank until there was only $7.02 per person. Large numbers lost their farms because they couldn’t get money to pay back their crop and mortgage loans.

    The wonderful thing for Ron about the Long Depression is that it had the “gold standard.” But what he doesn’t get is that the gold standard has always been a form of fractional reserve.

    Yes, fractional reserve—which allows banks to loan 10 times more money than they have—is a fraud.

    But the only reason America survived the Long Depression is because fractional reserve kept on creating a little new money. The Long Depression with its ‘gold standard’ would’ve been much worse without fractional reserve.

    But Ron Paul, spokesman for the Jewish Austrian School, wants to stop fractional reserve and eliminate the creation of any new money…the very trick that made his ideal gold standard period bearable.

    What would happen in Paul’s program if we froze the money, stopped issuing new money, and required the dollar to be exchanged for gold?

    All credit cards would shut down because it’s all new money. No one could buy gas or groceries.

    How about your Social Security check? Forget it. The US government is broke. Where would it get gold to back the checks?

    Five minutes after the gold standard banks opened, China and India with their trillions of dollars would empty Fort Knox.

    There would be ten mile lines at every bank in the world waiting to turn in dollars for gold. Puff. No more money. America becomes a Third World country.

    Now, since Ron Paul’s program is obviously suicidal, we must ask why he promotes it and what’s the real solution?

    Stay tuned. That’s for next time.

    • Replies: @Truth Vigilante
  155. @Truth Vigilante

    Sir
    I believe readers should be aware you are not qualified to be libeling me online about whether my libertarianism meets your requirements, given you are only a piano teacher. You have no idea of what degrees I hold or my extensive work and publishing experience. Stop libeling me.

    • Replies: @Truth Vigilante
  156. Miro23 says:
    @迪路

    Thanks for that interesting answer.

    In a strict sense, from my perspective as a Chinese, Western-style democracy is fundamentally flawed in its definition.
    The West wrongly presents the political election game as democracy.
    However, this representative democracy actually lacks an effective feedback mechanism. Voters elect representatives, who then formulate policies. If the policies fail, it means that everyone is held responsible, but in reality, it’s as if no one is held responsible at all.

    My point of view is that the needs of most people are fairly straightforward.

    They’re 1) work opportunities 2) reasonable income 3) a house or apartment 4) marriage, children and community 5) low cost quality education and healthcare.

    If these needs are taken care of, then the public don’t seem to care about which political system is behind it. So looking at the last 40 years, US democracy has failed and Chinese directed capitalism has succeeded (apart from the marriage/children aspect*).

    The idea is that political legitimacy comes from the success or otherwise of the “national service” actions of the elite.

    Western Democracy with its slowness, corruption and lack of planning was OK during the massive independent wealth creation of the Industrial Revolution + the subsequent destruction of industrial competitors in WW2. But when these competitors came back post WW2 (and reached technological parity) then the focus was back on elite “national service” where the inadequacy of Western Democracy is plain to see.

    * China and the West are both suffering from confusion about the role of women. Do women primarily build homes/families while being (principally) supported by their husbands – which is the evolutionary answer, or do they primarily work = long hours, no time for children + lack of suitable partners (they’ve actually taken many of their jobs) – which is the progressive feminist gender equality answer.

    • Replies: @迪路
  157. @Mr. Crowley

    Excellent article and comments.

    Block’s statements were the reason I finally wrote this article about Ayn Rand which had been something I had been thinking on for quite a while…

    https://www.unz.com/article/dynamiting-the-temple-of-ayn-rand/

    Blocks articles during the last two years can be perfectly matched to the famous ten stages of genocide.

    Look how his articles fit with the famous ten steps – according to my ordering:
    The Ten Stages of Genocide
    By Dr. Gregory H. Stanton

  158. @ariadna

    You wrote this about the cast of Seinfeld:

    and funny thing they were all Jews…

    In fact Michael Richards (who played Cosmo Kramer), was NOT a Jew.
    And he was by far the funniest character on the show.

    In fact, absent Kramer, the show is a FAILURE.
    Kramer makes the show. His interactions with other characters (like J. Peterman, George Costanza’s father and others), these are the HIGHLIGHTS of the show. (some examples below):

    [MORE]

    • Replies: @JesusWasAGayJew
    , @ariadna
  159. 迪路 says:
    @Miro23

    My view is exactly the opposite. Social systems were not created to meet basic needs; rather, they emerged as a response to the development of human history, brought about by humans themselves.
    Since the Industrial Revolution, the economic power of the West has been built on colonial plunder. For instance, Jewish families like the Sassons basically amassed their wealth by plundering our resources.
    The Western system is also based on using its own system to interpret seemingly “benign” colonial plunder.
    Because it is necessary to bring democracy to other countries, plunder is deemed reasonable. This logic is completely coupled with the logic of the Crusades.
    However, unfortunately, when plundering cannot continue, this logic will no longer be self-consistent. The sharpness of Western society’s plundering will be redirected towards itself.
    In contrast, our leaders set the tone in the early days of the founding of the country. They did not establish the state to colonize the world, but to establish it for the future of humanity. Therefore, the established system itself also conforms to the logic of the founders.
    All systems are created for a purpose, not for the purpose of enabling people to obtain basic satisfaction. If the system is only for enabling humans to obtain satisfaction, then humanity will lose its future, because the simplest theoretical way is to treat humans like pigs, and then humans will spend their entire lives happily like animals.
    In fact, basic satisfaction is merely a by-product of the realization of social systems. We need to achieve the goal of not using colonialism to enable humanity to have a future.
    This is a proof problem.

    As for the issue of feminism you mentioned, unfortunately there is no answer to it anywhere at present.
    However, even if there is a feminism issue, it is completely wrong for the West to solve it by introducing the LGBTQ issue. We will wait for the corresponding sociological practices to gradually solve the problem.
    To be honest, considering that most modern women are vulgar and low-class, I haven’t even considered having a relationship with them.
    After all, as a native of Shanghai, I can be considered a millionaire. However, I do not pursue vulgar physical pleasures. I consider them to be base.
    So at this moment, I don’t feel that there is any need for women around me at all.
    Many Chinese people and I think in this way.
    So at this stage, we believe that we don’t need women, and even sex.

    If you’re interested, you can learn about our unique “Anti-Indecision” program here.Here is the content I copied from there: Some people might not agree with this statement. So, let me rephrase it. When we engage in immoral behavior, our bodies, minds, and thoughts are all problematic. During this period, we have harmed many people, especially our parents and those who are very close to us. As the harm lasts longer, their attitudes towards us also change, which leads to deteriorated interpersonal relationships and living conditions. And these changes will cause our future lives to deteriorate. Those who have jobs know that if no one helps you or if everyone rejects and hinders you, it is not easy to achieve success and live a satisfactory life. This requires us to actively help others and gradually bring about a positive change in their attitudes towards us. Only then will our lives gradually improve. The ones we hurt the most are our parents. The change in our parents towards us is also significant. This requires us to be filial to our parents to make them look at us with new eyes. When our relationship with our parents is good, our lives will definitely improve! During the period of abstaining from immorality, helping others is very important. I suggest helping others to abstain from immorality simultaneously during the period of abstinence. This is doing good deeds. This is the simultaneous practice of repentance and doing good deeds. Then, for the recovery of our bodies, our lives, and the difficult problems during the period of abstinence, there will be significant improvements! Let’s stop here for today. In the future, if I have any insights, I will write them out and share them with everyone. I hope it will be helpful to you. Try to quit immoral behavior as soon as possible, find the lost beauty again, and keep going!

  160. @JM

    I’ve watched many a Brother Nathanael video over the years and, for the most part, he gets a lot right.
    But anyone with even a basic understanding of economics, would know that what Bro Nat says in this case is PURE ECONOMIC ILLITERACY.

    There is so much bullshit in that passage you quoted that I don’t know where to begin.
    Let’s start with this ridiculous sentence of yours:

    And did you know that Ron Paul’s favorite period in American history is the “Long Depression” that lasted from the end of the Civil War to 1886?

    First of all, I have watched nearly the entirety of the TWO THOUSAND or more episodes of The Ron Pual Liberty Report over more than a decade.
    In ADDITION to that I have invested many 100’s of hours of watching his other speeches, keynote addresses and reading his articles covering the time since he entered Congress in the mid 1970’s.

    And Dr Ron Paul has NEVER mentioned favouring the ‘Long Recession’ that you allege came in the wake of The War of Northern Aggression (which some mistakenly refer to as The Civil War).
    So that is a BALD FACED LIE.

    And it is a bald faced lie for another reason. ie: Because THERE WAS NO DEPRESSION (0r even a mid duration recession) in the years from 1865-1886.
    JM, what have you been smoking to take at face value that there was ANY substantive and long lasting downturn during those years? Are you that ignorant to have believed that for even one second?

    FACT: Every so many years there is a slight downturn in any economy, as entrepreneurs overinvest in plant and machinery in anticipation of booms that don’t immediately come to fruition.
    Investors and private individuals also get over exuberant and make decisions with their money or take out loans that turn out to have been reckless.

    But for the period 1865-1886 in America, when viewed a whole, these were BOOM TIMES.
    America grew at a compound rate like no large country has either before or since (other than for China over the last 40 years).

    So what Bro Nat said is the OPPOSITE of the truth.
    You also wrote (in the case that the dollar could be exchanged for gold):

    All credit cards would shut down because it’s all new money. No one could buy gas or groceries.

    That statement is PURE IDIOCY!!!
    How could anyone be so brain dead to think, for even a nanosecond, that this could possibly be true?
    I have news for you JM:

    THE WORLD IS ALREADY ON AN EFF’N GOLD STANDARD of sorts.

    Right now as we speak, the price off gold is around USD $ 4250/oz.
    In late 2015 it bottomed out at around USD $ 1050/oz.
    In other words the USD HAS LOST OVER 75% of its value vs REAL MONEY (ie: Gold) over the last decade.

    And why do you think that is, my economically illiterate friend?
    The holders of USD have BEEN DUMPING THEM LIKE A HOT POTATO and putting their money into tangible assets – like mostly GOLD!!

    That’s right. Anyone in the world RIGHT NOW can go to a bullion dealer and exchange their USD, JPY, GBP, Euros or whatever, and purchase gold and silver.
    Or they can buy that perennial favourite among coins – the Australian or British sovereign, or perhaps a half sovereign.

    Now, I’m aware that Americans were not allowed to buy gold from 1933 until about 1974 (?) – from memory), and that in India right now there are laws banning the importation for gold for purchase by private individuals (although a lot still manages to be smuggled into the country).
    But for the rest of the WHOLE EFF’N WORLD people have been exchanging their [soon-to-be] worthless paper scrip for REAL MONEY (ie: gold/silver) for well over a hundred eff’n years.

    So I ask you: Did the credit cards shut down during that period? Was the bulk of humanity prevented from buying petrol for their cars or groceries?
    I appreciate that those were not your words but those of Bro Nat, but WHAT THE EFF WAS GOING THROUGH YOUR HEAD TO BELIEVE SUCH HORSESHIT for even one second?

    I heard one idiot say in an earlier comment that bubbles pop (alluding to gold).
    Well, there are indeed bubbles out there (Bitcoin, other cryptocurrencies, the U.S stock and bond markets etc). It will end badly for all of them – and catastrophically for Bitcoin.
    These are GENUINE bubbles.

    NOT SO with Gold. There is NO BUBBLE for gold.
    Both gold and silver (seeing as we will likely revert to a bimetallic standard as has been in existence for over 5000 years of recorded history), are GOING TO THE MOON.

    And that’s because Fiat currencies are being printed/digitally conjured by the scores of trillions – with lots more to come, as countries finance their growing deficits and cradle to grave welfare states with the printing press.

    It’s an exceedingly simple equation.
    The Price of Gold moves INVERSELY to the value of the world’s fiat currencies.
    And because countries all over the world are digitally conjuring OBSCENE quantities of their currencies, ipso facto the VALUE of a unit of any of those currencies is going to ZERO.

    And what is the reciprocal of ZERO? That’s right – it’s INFINITY.
    There is NO CEILING to where gold (and silver) is headed.

    I suggest you get some ASAP – or at least invest in precious metal equities.
    If you snooze, you’ll lose.

  161. @Wayne Lusvardi

    Piano teacher?
    Would you like to sit close by and listen to my excruciating attempt at playing any musical instrument?
    For the record, something that is well known to all UR readers (at least those that regularly participate in the UR threads dealing with matters of substance – like the 9/11 False Flag, threads which you are NEVER to be found at Mr Lusvardi, seeing as you lose no sleep over the heinous depravity of crimes committed by Malignant International Jewry), I have a ‘substantial’ hard science academic background.

    And if you’re wondering how ‘substantial’ it is, it was enough to make mince meat out of a foot soldier of ZOG/the ADL who uses the handle Physicist Dave.
    Now, for those of you that don’t know who Physicist Dovid* is (*I prefer to address him by his Hebrew birth name), he is a Stanford univerisity PhD in Physics that Ron Unz invited to participate in the 9/11 UR threads.

    Well, Physicist Dovid (aka Phy-Do, or Fido as I often called him – because he is a Jewish dog that was assigned to this webzine to muddy the waters and deflect attention away from his Talmudic masters for their orchestration of 9/11), turned out to be a lying hound.
    So I did a community service by pummelling him into the ground and ensuring that he had a nervous breakdown**.

    (**Physicist Dovid, someone who usually posted multiple comments per day and many thousands in aggregate, disappeared for about 8-10 months. We suspect he went to rehab to get psychiatric treatment after continually being exposed as a liar by myself and few notable others).

    Now Mr Lusvardi, you accuse me of libelling you. But, do you understand, it is only libellous if what I’m saying about you is untrue. And of course all that I’ve said is true.
    Now, you deserve accolades for looking after your elderly parent(s) and not relying on welfare and the other things you’re done. I applaud you.

    But you have NO RIGHT to smear libertarianism in the way you have.
    Now, let’s be clear, The ZOG misfits have long ago infiltrated the Libertarian Party and I’m well aware of what pretend libertarians like Gary Johnson have said in the past.
    But when I speak of ‘libertarianism’ I speak of the only subset of it that matters – and fortunately this is the subset that most genuine libertarians identify with.

    Of course I refer to RON PAUL LIBERTARIANISM – which overlaps with Harry Browne or Rothbardian libertarianism.
    This type of libertarianism has SOLUTIONS for all of America’s (and the world’s) ailments.
    Be that foreign policy, economic matters, fiscal and monetary discipline, Sound Money, The Non Aggression Principle, Ending the Fed, not sending a SINGLE DOLLAR to the Apartheid Israeli state and much more.
    It literally ADDRESSES EVERYTHING.

    And Lusvardi, despite your protests that you’re a lapsed libertarian of sorts, it is clear that you don’t appreciate the degree to which Ron Paul libertarianism can rectify all that is wrong in the world.
    So be a good fellow, if you don’t want to read Rothbard then you don’t have to.
    But at the very least watch The Ron Paul Liberty Report every weekday as I do and educate yourself.

    You’ll soon understand why Lew Rockwell (and countless millions around the world), acknowledge that Dr Ron Paul is THE GREATEST*** LIVING AMERICAN.

    (***Don’t just take Lew Rockwell’s or my word for it. Watch the 90 secs of the following video from 1:30-3:00, as this well known individual provides his input while speaking at the Ron Paul Institute for Peace and Prosperity about a month or so ago):
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wMnRSxt2yco

    In the words of Col. Douglas Macgregor:
    No one has been MORE RIGHT ABOUT EVERYTHING than Dr Ron Paul.

    • Replies: @Wayne Lusvardi
  162. @Wayne Lusvardi

    What is this “we”? Do you have a mouse in your pocket? Who is to set these limits of yours? I seem to recall names like Lenin, Stalin, Mao setting limits for their Children. Your paternalism is fascinating.

    • Agree: Liza
  163. Chris Moore says: • Website
    @Fenrir_288

    Your comment in its entirely is incredibly insightful. If every American read it and internalized it, our problems would be over very quickly. The jews are unnaturally wicked, and top muslims aren’t far behind. The Judas Class aren’t far behind the lot.

    The rats are under the pillars. The jews are under the lot.

    • Replies: @Fenrir_288
  164. @JunkyardDog

    You cite billionaires yet no others on the face of the planet would trade places with them

    The fuck you talking ’bout, kike?

    I was replying to some imbecile who thinks that since he can ‘beat the shit’ out of Allan Dershowitz and Jerry Seinfeld he ought to have more wealth and power than them.

    I was also pointing out that he could also beat up goy billionaires like Bezos and Gates, so what’s the actual point? Makes zero sense.

    At any rate, you really thing most people wouldn’t trade places with Musk or Bezos?

    I’m beginning to think that the losers on TUR are more than just low-IQ morons. They have multiple screws loose as well.

    This place is like comedy central….lol

    • Replies: @ariadna
  165. @Truth Vigilante

    And he was by far the funniest character on the show.

    Michael Richards is a physical comedy genius. So no argument there.

    But you do realize he wasn’t writing his material, right?

    Those hilarious lines he delivered with such perfect comedic timing were mostly written by Larry David.

    • Replies: @The Gimp
  166. Che Guava says:
    @Bro43rd

    I don’t really care, just pissed off at seeing that u-name as the first comment on almost every article lately,

    comment(s) are held for moderation.

    Held for moderation is long-standing. Early comments were treated in order of posting. Now, they make a little pool, and as said earlier, if you make a relatively early reply, you don’t get any confirmatory feedback unless you naturally re-post, in which case you get the ‘Looks like you already said that.’ message.

  167. @Skeptikal

    Bottom line is that no matter how you slice it, they have no claim to Palestine.

    This is not how the world works, retard.

    I am no fan of Israel, but they have as much of a ‘claim’ to that land as any other group on earth has a claim to their land.

    Because the reality is that most land was taken by force. Whether it’s the Anglo-Saxons conquering Britain, or the British conquering North America, the people indigenous to those lands were none too thrilled with the proceedings.

    That’s why the whole question of whether Israel has a ‘right to exist’ is completely moronic and ludicrous.

    It doesn’t matter whether anyone thinks Israel has a right to exist. What matters is that it does exist. And it’s going to continue to exist until someone halts its existence with force.

    And whoever tries to take it by force had better come to terms with Israel’s nuclear-armed subs.

    Not that Israel actually has nukes ; o )

  168. JM says:

    No Long Depression in the USA?

    Here is the Wikipedia entry on the Long Depression:

    The Long Depression was a worldwide price and economic recession, beginning in 1873 and running either through March 1879, or 1899, depending on the metrics used.[1] It was most severe in Europe and the United States, which had been experiencing strong economic growth fueled by the Second Industrial Revolution in the decade following the American Civil War. The episode was labeled the “Great Depression” at the time, and it held that designation until the Great Depression of the 1930s. Though it marked a period of general deflation and a general contraction, it did not have the severe economic retrogression of the later Great Depression.[2]

    ….In the United States, historians refer to the Depression of 1873–1879, kicked off by the Panic of 1873, and followed by the Panic of 1893, book-ending an era of prosperity. The U.S. National Bureau of Economic Research dates the contraction following the panic as lasting from October 1873 to March 1879. At 65 months, it is the longest-lasting contraction identified by the NBER, eclipsing the Great Depression’s 43 months of contraction.[5][6] In the United States, from 1873 to 1879, 18,000 businesses went bankrupt, including 89 railroads.[7] Unemployment peaked in 1878 at 8.25%.[8]

    As to Cause, this entry says this:

    Causes of the crisis
    Main article: Panic of 1873

    Run on the Fourth National Bank, No. 20 Nassau Street, New York City, 1873. From Frank Leslie’s Illustrated Newspaper, October 4, 1873.
    In 1873, during a decline in the value of silver – exacerbated by the end of the German Empire’s production of thaler coins – the US government passed the Coinage Act of 1873 in April. This essentially ended the bimetallic standard of the United States, forcing it for the first time onto a pure gold standard. This measure, referred to by its opponents as “the Crime of 1873” and the topic of William Jennings Bryan’s Cross of Gold speech in 1896, forced a contraction of the money supply in the United States.
    …The primary cause of the price depression in the United States was the tight monetary policy that the United States followed to get back to the gold standard after the Civil War. The U.S. government was taking money out of circulation to achieve this goal, therefore there was less available money to facilitate trade.

    So Kapner (who, like you, doesn’t supply references), got his dates for the Long Depression wrong but the rest of it more or less right, except perhaps his assertion that Paul ‘claimed the period as his favorite, something that can only be resolved by reference to Paul’s writings prior to the date of publication of Kapner’s article above. In a sense the latter is beside the point because with or without it, his assertions stand. It is apparently significant because the article marks his first break from Paul as this piece asserts:

    https://realcurrencies.wordpress.com/2013/11/20/what-happened-to-brother-nathanael-and-his-u-turn-on-ron-paul-and-monetary-reform/

    Kapner’s also right about credit cards causing an addition to the money supply, as he is of the Austrian School support of a Gold Standard and an associated restriction of lending to savings.

    There’s no need to lecture about the crisis in indebtedness and inflation in the US, nor about the truth that gold represents real value and as such, isn’t subject to bubbles.

    But this doesn’t support the notion that it is the most suitable backing for currencies.

    I’d say that the German system of monetary issuance of the 1930’s, dependent on the creation of real economic values but independent of gold and the economic miracle that occured under it, is the best model for the future.

    • Replies: @Truth Vigilante
  169. @Truth Vigilante

    Sir
    Who appointed you to be THE judge of who is libertaria? What kind of libertarian is against free speech? Screw you. You no nothing about me.

    • Replies: @Truth Vigilante
  170. Che Guava says:
    @Anon

    More than once, when the Internet was only available to the true elites, as in engineering, hard science, mathematics, computing students and faculty, when such education was rigorous, I read stories in print media of people selling tapeworm eggs in capsules as slimming pills.

    What a nightmare for the stupid buyers! I’m sure they would have lost weight, but how icky when the tapeworms became emergent!

    That man does look a little like a human-tapeworm hybrid.

    • Replies: @Liza
  171. Che Guava says:
    @notanonymousHere

    Of course I know, and if I wanted to, could take advantage of a time-zone difference in early p.m.

    Usually, though, I am busy with work at that time.

    Doesn’t make any difference now, since early comments are pooled and then re-ordered, I suppose unless it’s a topic noone much is interested in.

    I don’t care too much, and find people obsessed with ‘first post’ to be fools. When Taki’s mag had open comments (years ago now), it really made the comments threads unreadable. Never commented there myself.

    Mr. Crowley’s obsession has, it seems, been
    curtailed.

    Thx.

  172. @Chris Moore

    Thank you. And you can reverse engineer the whole Kirk Psyop to see how obvious their whole mechanism of control is. It is wholly dependent on polarization and sectarianism.

  173. ariadna says:
    @Truth Vigilante

    Oh, pardon me… the regular cast are all Jews except for one honorary Jew.

    Wikipedia says Richards is a …Freemason.
    His Jewish advisor and lawyer, Howard Rubenstein claimed at first that Richard was a Jew, then stated:
    “He said to me he has adopted the Jewish religion as his belief, but he wasn’t born Jewish,” Rubenstein said, adding that while Richards does not practice Judaism, he has had some “Jewish advisers” in the past.’
    The Forward concluded: “Richards Not a Jew, Just Jew-ish.”
    He is an honorary Jew: a racist bully who impersonates ably his character in the ‘show about nothing’: a parasite, living off others, loud, and obnoxious. His “comedic genius” is Borsht Belt slapstick.

    • Disagree: follyofwar
    • Replies: @follyofwar
  174. @John Trout

    Seinfeld jewed his co-actors; he is the only one to receive royalties for reruns of his show.

    This is the sort of retarded comedy gem only found on TUR.

    So the guy who created the show, starred in it, co-wrote numerous episodes, and who’s name is the title of the fucking show, should share credit equally with hired actors?

    My god, the level of stupidity here is staggering.

    • Replies: @ariadna
  175. @Wayne Lusvardi

    You no nothing about me.

    I do know that you don’t KNOW how to spell ‘KNOW’.

    • Replies: @Wayne Lusvardi
  176. ariadna says:
    @JesusWasAGayJew

    Who said “equally,” lying troll?

  177. Who said “equally,” lying troll?

    Equally, unequally…who gives a shit? Splitting hairs like this is disingenuous, and you know it.

    It’s his show and the hired actors knew the arrangement. If they didn’t like it, they could have walked. And they could have created, written and starred in their own shows.

    It’s not like they were struggling financially. I think they were making $1 million and episode toward the end.

    Lying troll? I don’t think so, you filthy kike.

    • Replies: @andyay
    , @ariadna
  178. @ariadna

    Richards was a comedic genius. Seinfeld is a two-bit stand-up comic with no acting ability. Without Cosmo, Seinfeld would have been lucky to last more than one season. Although he didn’t write the lines, Richards gained my undying respect for his bit excoriating Jewish circumcision in the hilarious episode “The Bris.” Too bad he ruined his career when he lost his mind in a racist rant against blacks.

    • Replies: @Alvin
  179. Alvin says:
    @follyofwar

    Seinfeld and Larry David realized after a couple of seasons that Jerry couldn’t carry the show all by himself, that the show couldn’t revolve around Jerry or it was going to be cancelled. They had to give the other characters plots of their own that came together at the end of each episode. I think the two-part trip to LA in the beginning of Season 4 was the turning point of the show.

  180. @Truth Vigilante

    How much does the CIA pay you? Quit beating your wife, partner, dog and be a good libertarian. Quit hiding behind your alias and fully disclose your identity as a good libertarian. And by the way, none of the above are libeling you!!!!!

  181. The Gimp says:
    @JesusWasAGayJew

    Larry David was the the genius behind the show. When he left quality dropped. Jerry Seinfeld was the perfect straight man. Not a fan of his comedy routines and his movies are atrociously bad (“The Bee Movie” and “Unfrosted”)

    According to his bio Michael Richards was raised Roman Catholic.

  182. andyay says:
    @JesusWasAGayJew

    Leave ariadna alone. You are spiritually shoddy and intellectually shallow.
    I can only suppose that your moniker was chosen in a fit of adolescent pique.
    Don’t you know that it’s unbecoming and says the worst of you, if you set out to offend something in the region of 25%, of the readership here, who love Jesus. Who are you appealing to? Satanists like Mr. Crowley and JudeoSatanism?

    I will not celebrate your emotional crash.

  183. Liza says:
    @Che Guava

    Apparently that is what Maria Callas did, as she was under pressure to lose weight. No wonder her glorious voice went south.

    • Thanks: Che Guava
  184. Xavier says:

    This is a common pattern that one sees throughout history. Jews fund a movement for opportunistic reasons until their golem turns on them. The reason this happens is because whites are genuinely universalist in their thinking and apply these principles in good faith. This then backfires on the Jews who then whine about how their allies have turned against them. What the Jews see as betrayal is basically the values they espoused (for opportunistic reasons) being applied in good faith. This is why both liberals and conservatives have turned against Israel.

    • Replies: @Bay Area Guy
  185. @Same old same old

    Indeed, but then why do They feverishly want to replace any remaining form of government with their brand, Democracy ™?

    Monarchs never dreamed of the level of control exerted by today’s States. Sure, they didn’t have the tech, but did Louis IV give a hoot about what peasants thought about gender or race? Our masters want complete control; the tech has been developed subsequently.

    Democracy allows the State to wield complete control over the peasants by allowing them to use media and outright fraud to manipulate the vooting results, so that they can claim their policies are “what the people want.”

    A monarch may be a crapshoot, from the people’s point of view, but also from the Elite’s as well. That heir to the throne could be for or against them, or change his mind midway. Democracy makes control safe and predictable; our Elites are nothing if not bourgeois.

  186. @Truth Vigilante

    Since you mention Ron Paul, it was only last week that he platformed on his show the anti-Zionist pastor Chuck Baldwin. Dr. Paul flirted with the third rail:
    https://twitter.com/ronpaul/status/1976364155130216738?s=46&t=iCR90OEpDTNTBpk8DHpN4g

    The real split in the libertarian movement will be when a significant faction abandons the Austrian School as simply an apologia for the Talmudists weapon of usury – the original fiat money.

    I had fallen away on the usury issue just before Thomas Woods published The Church and the Market: A Catholic Defense of the Free Economy”

    In that book Woods was forced to provide a few paragraphs addressing the Church’s proscription of usury as stated in the 1745 Encyclical Vix Prevenit – On Usury and Other Dishonest Profits .

    https://www.papalencyclicals.net/ben14/b14vixpe.htm

    In those short paragraphs Woods turned the clear intent of the encyclical on its head in order to align with the Austrian School’s position that usury (interest) is “natural”.

    That confirmed for me that the Austrian School was set up to knock down the remaining barriers against usury in Christian economic thought. And here we are.

    • Replies: @Truth Vigilante
  187. Democracy allows the State to wield complete control over the peasants by allowing them to use media and outright fraud to manipulate the vooting results, so that they can claim their policies are “what the people want.”

    This is why it makes perfect sense to cancel elections or ban parties (essential aspects of democracy) in order to “save democracy” (Democracy ™)

  188. @JM

    You begin your comment with:

    Here is the Wikipedia entry on the Long Depression

    :
    Are you aware what Wikipedia has to say about:

    [MORE]

    1) Who killed JFK? (They claim it’s Lee Harvey Oswald – the ‘Lone Gunman’).
    Correct Answer: There were several teams of shooters positioned around Dealey Plaza that day.
    Some bullets hit JFK (and Governor Connally), while some missed.
    And none of those hits came from LHO – seeing as he fired no bullets that day.

    2) The Holohoax (they allege 6 million yids were murdered by the Germans).
    Correct Answer: There were NO gas chambers for killing humans at any of the work camps (that were falsely labelled as ‘extermination centres’).
    And there was no systematic mass murder (or even a small scale version) initiated by the Germans against any minority within those work camps.

    3) Anthropogenic Global Warming (Wikipedia alleges man-made CO2 will lead to Climate Armageddon).
    Correct Answer: CO2 is the gas of life and is a negligible determinant in the average earth temperature. The vast majority of the increase in CO2 over the last 150 years was caused by Mother Nature (eg: Outgassing).

    4) The Covid Psyop and the toxic clot shots. (Wikipedia says the experimental mRNA gene therapies that masqueraded as vaccines were ‘safe and effective’).
    Actual reality: They killed countless millions worldwide and injured hundreds of millions more – and that death toll is still rising, as a phenomenon called ‘Turbo cancers’ sweeps through all the heavily vaxxed countries.

    I could go on ad infinitum.
    Simply put: ZOG owned/controlled Wikipedia is worthless on all the major issues that involve the malfeasance of Malignant International Jewry.

    You see, the Federal Reserve (owned by a private cartel of Jewish misfits), came into being in 1913.
    And to justify its existence, the small hats have been propagandising gullible individuals like you ever since and saying stuff like:
    ‘The Fed was created to smooth out the business cycle and ameliorate the severity of recessions/Depressions etc’.

    And to that end they have MASSIVELY EXAGGERATED the severity of the mild recessions that occurred in the 19th century while simultaneously understating the depth of the catastrophic contractions we’ve had in the last century or so.

    Now, the fact of the matter is that most of us use Wikipedia from time to time – and I am one such person.
    Wikipedia is perfectly OK for sourcing MUNDANE STUFF.
    But when it comes to covering for the lies of ZOG, to major geopolitical events, to assassinations of prominent individuals etc, Wikipedia LIES LIKE IT BREATHES.

    You go on to speak of:

    The Long Depression was a worldwide price and economic recession, beginning in 1873 and running either through March 1879, or 1899 …

    As we’re all aware, two consecutive quarters of negative growth is defined as a recession.
    But you did not use the word ‘recession’ in your block quoted remark above.
    You unambiguously called it a DEPRESSION – and a long one at that.
    So, by implication you’re implying that GDP went south for many years – not just a few quarters.

    I suggest you click on the link below for Historical Chart: United States GDP 1776- :
    https://historyb.com/historical-chart-united-states-gdp-1776/

    For those too lazy to click on the link above, here is the chart below:

    Unfortunately, I could not find a chart that more clearly shows the last part of the 19th century. ie: post the War of Northern Aggression (which ended in 1865).
    But I can assure you that the 35 years after that war were BOOM TIMES, as U.S GDP ROCKETED UPWARDS.

    NOTE ALSO: The graph above is GDP per capita – which grew VERY STRONGLY.
    (You can make out from the graph that in 1865 it was about $3000 – that’s the trough after the initial upward uptick – and then went to about $7500 in 1899).
    ie: up by a factor of around two and a half times.

    But the U.S population EXPLODED in that time, which made the per capita GDP figures look tamer than they otherwise would have been.
    What I’m getting at is that in the last 35 years of the 19th century, the U.S GDP in NOMINAL TERMS (ie: in actual dollar terms), went up geometrically.
    In other words it was PHENOMENAL.

    Summary: I don’t know why I need to be explaining this to you JM.
    Is your knowledge of history that PISS POOR that you didn’t know that the decades post the War of Northern Aggression were ABSOLUTELY SPECTACULAR.

    Yes, there were some short contractions that were soon done and dusted.
    In their aftermath the U.S economy was FIRING ON ALL CYLINDERS.
    Only a complete idiot would suggest, for even a second, that these were not among the MOST PROSPEROUS YEARS IN THE HISTORY OF THE REPUBLIC.

    Let me show you another graph as well (the U.S Consumer Price Index from 1775-2012). ie: the measure of inflation:

    It’s a little bit hard to read but, if you get your magnifying glass, you’ll see that the Price level (which CPI measures) was LESS in 1900 than in 1800.
    In other words, because the U.S (and the western world) was on the Classical Gold Standard during the 19th century, a dollar in 1900 had MORE purchasing power than it did a century prior in 1800.
    Got that JM? Although there were periods of inflation during the 19th century (the 1861-65 war being the most prominent among them), for the 19th century as a WHOLE prices went DOWN.

    In other words, the U.S experience DEFLATION.
    (And not by a few percentage points either. I recall reading that a dollar in 1900 had around 25-30% more purchasing power than it did in 1800).
    That’s what a Gold Standard does. Not only are there no episodes of chronic inflation, the purchasing power of the the citizens savings is PRESERVED and in fact enhanced when your currency is backed by gold.

    But that’s not the half of it.
    The average wage in 1900 was much higher than it was in 1800.
    So Americans not only earned more dollars each week from their jobs in NOMINAL TERMS, but each of those dollars bought you more.
    A total WIN-WIN for the citizenry.

    Lastly, you write this:

    I’d say that the German system of monetary issuance of the 1930’s, dependent on the creation of real economic values but independent of gold

    There used to be a fool called Bill and he was a also a MoFo.
    Coincidentally the handle he used in UR was MoFo-Bill. And he used to write all manner of B.S (like that economic charlatan Michael Hudson – his messiah).

    MoFo Bill and I had many exchanges, and I swatted down his economic insanity every time.
    I mean, this guy was your classically indoctrinated Keynesian that knew jack-shit (like his guru Michael Hudson).

    MoFo Bill would take every opportunity to smear the Gold Standard because, like his Jewish benefactors that own the Federal Reserve, the Gold Standard entails fiscal discipline and having to LIVE WITHIN YOUR MEANS.

    But the Jews that control the western financial system don’t particularly fancy fiscal discipline.
    They much prefer s FIAT MONETARY SYSTEM, like what the U.S has now.
    This enables them to print/digitally conjure ENDLESS TRILLIONS OF USD that it is then able to dole out to itself and its Talmudic cronies.
    And of course, what can you tell me about the rate of inflation after the creation of the ZOG owned Federal Reserve?

    That’s right. It started with a slow uptick (the Great Depression had a lot to do with keeping a lid on rising prices), but thereafter EXPLODED upwards.
    That’s what a Fiat Monetary System inevitably results in.

    As for the German Economic Miracle of the 1930’s, some uninformed individuals say this was done without the need for a Gold Standard.
    That is INCORRECT.
    Germany was defacto on a Gold Standard because THE EFF’N WORLD WAS ON A GOLD STANDARD.
    Let me explain:

    For Germany to rearm and for its economy to prosper, it needed to import certain raw materials (eg: Oil, iron ore, nickel, copper and so forth), that it did not have.
    And as we observed during WWI when the British navy blockaded German ports and this resulted in millions starving, Germany was never self sufficient in food supplies.

    So it had to export manufactured items to the world to obtain the HARD CURRENCY (eg: USD and GBP) that were backed by gold.
    Said hard currency was then used to buy the necessary commodities and food imports to fill the bellies of its nutritionally deprived citizenry.

    Now, as far as paying the wages of its own citizenry, the Reichsbank could just print up the necessary local currency to satisfy that requirement.
    But by the latter part of the mid 1930’s, inflationary pressures were rapidly building up.
    The German economy would’ve come unstuck if not for FRESH INFUSIONS OF GOLD.

    And where, pray tell, did that gold come from?
    Well, after the Anschluss with Austria, Germany took the latter’s gold.
    After the reincorporation of the Sudetenland and thereafter the occupation of Czechoslovakia, Germany took their gold as well.

    Then, in May 1940, after the conquest of the Low Countries (The Netherlands, Belgium, Denmark) and later France*, an even greater windfall of gold came the Germans’s way.
    (*Although France managed to hide the bulk of their central bank gold holdings from the Germans, so the latter only ever got a small portion of it).

    JM, you have much to learn about monetary matters (and even more to learn about actual historical GDP figures – where you’re evidently clueless).
    So do the right thing. Pull you head in, stop making ridiculous assertions (all obtained from ZOG sources it appears), without doing the due diligence first.
    Or you’ll end up with egg on your face as you have in this instance.

    • Replies: @mulga mumblebrain
  189. @Xavier

    Plus, even if Jews in western countries did espouse progressive/universalist values in good faith, they wouldn’t get any brownie points for it in my book.

    Why not? Because as a minority group that’s historically been at odds with a white Christian majority, it’s in their best interests to be liberal.

    The true test for such values is how liberal a group is when they’re the powerful majority, which for Jews is Israel – a psychotic ethnostate that makes even the most bigoted MAGA Republicans look like woke liberals.

    So yeah, I don’t give Jews the benefit of the doubt in this regard.

    • Agree: Xavier, ariadna
  190. @The Company

    The real split in the libertarian movement will be when a significant faction abandons the Austrian School as simply an apologia for the Talmudists weapon of usury – the original fiat money.

    You have it arse backwards my foolish friend.
    WHO is the leading advocate on the planet for an End to the Fed (and has been for over 50 years)?
    Of course it is Dr Ron Paul.
    And he has that position because he’s well versed in the Austrian School of Economics.

    You see Austrian Economics has been EXPOSING the malfeasance of the ZOG owned Federal Reserve for countless decades.
    The Austrians, like Dr Ron Paul, advocate for a return to Sound Money. ie: a return to the Gold Standard. Simply put:

    AUSTRIAN ECONOMICS IS THE MORTAL ENEMY OF THE FIAT MONETARY SYSTEM.

    Got that Mr/Ms Company?
    How can the Austrian School be ‘apologia’ for the Talmudists and Fiat money, when it is at the vanguard of educating people about the need to ERADICATE the Fiat Monetary system?

    At the end of the day, there will be NO split among genuine libertarians.
    ie: within the dominant wing of the movement – which is Ron Paul libertarianism.
    Watch the 5 min video below and see for yourself. These people are ‘All-In’ with Ron Paul:

    As for the pseudo-libertarians like Walter Block and those malignant Jews that have infiltrated the party over recent times, no one gives a rat’s arse if they split from the party.
    Good riddance I say.
    They were never libertarians to begin with.

    • Replies: @The Company
  191. Che Guava says:
    @andyay

    What is the 77th Brigade?

    • Replies: @andyay
  192. andyay says:
    @Che Guava

    The 77th Brigade is a psychological warfare unit of the British army. They became prominent during the lockdown debacle, when they went a-knocking, door-to-door, with guns on their hips, gathering data and attempting to persuade ordinary folk into taking the mRNA-scrambling shots.

    I don’t say that Rixon Stewart is correct, necessarily but I trust him. He’s a veteran Rhodesian Paratrooper and he still has his specialists contacts.

    • Thanks: Che Guava
  193. ariadna says:
    @JesusWasAGayJew

    “Equally, unequally…who gives a shit? Splitting hairs like this is disingenuous..”

    No, pathetic lying troll. It’s not spitting hairs. It’s logic and fairness, albeit alien concepts to your judaic mind.
    There is a big difference between aportioning the profit according to the contribution of each member of a team– which still would have allowed the greedy s.o.b. to grab the ion’s share– and grabbing it all for himself.

    Two questions for you:
    — When you call me a”kike” does it hurt you at all to have to use a slur you hope would make it appear not to be one yourself?

    and

    –Is being a homosexual and a Jew a deep canker sore on your self-esteem you overcompensate with Jewish supremacist bluster and venomous hatred for Christians?

  194. @Truth Vigilante

    Yikes. Please check your assumptions.

    I read Creature From Jekyll Island a few month’s after it’s first publication in 1994 by American Opinion Books, the publishing arm of The John Birch Society. I was already a member of the Austrian Economics based FEE at that time. I later worked in the Ron Paul 2008 campaign and organized his speeches at UNC and Duke. Around the same time I was friend and occasional economic events chauffeur of FEE’s Bettina Greaves, “Mises best student” and heir to his copyrights.

    I’m certainly no fan of fractional reserver banking. My issue as indicated in my comment you quoted from is that usury is the original fiat money. In a sense, fiat money was introduced in part to settle contracts payable in gold that could not be paid because you can’t create gold simply by writing into an interest (usury) bearing contract that 10 coins today will become 11 coins next year.

    In the case of gold there was always the counter argument that more gold could be mined to cover the “money” created in an interest bearing contract. The reveal might be then when interest bearing contracts written in Bitcoin exceed any fabricated ability to be settled in Bitcoin.

    Usury is the driver that requires a fiat money system to sustain it’s practice. Maybe I’m a wayward soul, but after my romance with the Austrian School, I’ve sided with the pre-Austrian, pre-School of Salamanca line of thinking established by Aristotle: “Money is barren.”

    I hope this response inspires your further investigation.

    • Replies: @Truth Vigilante
  195. True Blue says:
    @Observator

    but the libertarian solution is to make elected representative government so “limited” that it is robbed of its authority to protect the many from the historically insatiable greed of the few.

    No. The solution is to make elected representative government so limited that it isn’t worth bribing or corrupting. It’s job is to protect the borders, punish gross crimes against its citizens, impartially arbitrate disagreements with a fair judicial system, and mint sound money.

    Concentrating vast power in a small number of hands enables the insatiably greedy to easily corrupt and then control an entire country (which is exactly where you find yourself today; and would have been impossible for them to pull off with a severely limited government.)

  196. ariadna says:
    @JesusWasAGayJew

    Of course you would “trade paces” with any billionaire Jew if you could!
    You are the stereotypical diaspora Jew, you are Tevye in Fiddler on the Roof who brings tears to Jewish eyes when he croons that maudlin, mewling kletzmer tune “If I Were a Rich Man.”
    The sad reality you can’t face is that the Jewish billionaires don’t give a dead Kaparot chicken’s ass about you and millions of diaspora Jews like you. You are ectopic shtetl dwelers, carrying the shtetl on your back like slugs carry their “house.” It is to protect you from assimilating.
    You are useful to them as a sayan but you will aways be a schmuck, a putz who doesn’t get to share their loot. But they tell you that you are “special, “chosen,” superior to all Goyim, isn’t that great, putz?

    • Thanks: Truth Vigilante
  197. @The Company

    Yikes. Please check your assumptions.

      
    I have – they’re rock solid.
    Better still, stop with the projection and instead check your own assumptions (because you’re evidently clueless).

    For some enlightenment, I strongly suggest that you scroll through and read (making sure to fully absorb), all my comments in this thread.
    That will increase your knowledge of economic matters by tenfold – at a minimum.

  198. @True Blue

    Proves yet again that ‘libertarians’ are the dumbest fucks EVER. Cut out the middle-man, politicians, thus eliminating even the sorry pretense of rule by the plebs in a ‘democracy’, and let the moneyed elites rule directly, without the inconvenience of bribing politicians or paying for mass brainwashing. How about banning ALL political ‘contributions’, advertising and lobbying, dumbo? No wonder the Chinese are eating your lunch.

    • Replies: @Truth Vigilante
  199. @True Blue

    In response to the asinine assertion from Mr Obervatory in an earlier comment that:
    ‘the libertarian solution is to make elected representative government so “limited” that it is robbed of its authority to protect the many from the historically insatiable greed of the few’,

    you responded brilliantly and succinctly with:

    No. The solution is to make elected representative government so limited that it isn’t worth bribing or corrupting.

    Concentrating vast power in a small number of hands enables the insatiably greedy to easily corrupt and then control an entire country (which is exactly where you find yourself today; and would have been impossible for them to pull off with a severely limited government.)

    UR readers, this the most outstanding comment in this thread.
    If any contribution deserved a Gold Border in this webzine in recent times, this comment is it.

    Mr Unz, are you reading this? You put a gold border around Jewish John’s Johnson’s comment #113 (a comment I immediately eviscerated – seeing as it was worthless drivel), yet you neglect to do it for those comments that are truly deserving.

    Tip of the hat to you ‘True Blue’.
    As a reward, I post below ‘True Blue’ – sung by the great Aussie John Williamson:

  200. @Truth Vigilante

    And I thought the troll had, finally, been scheduled and admitted to a secure facility.
    Just in recent weeks we have seen scientific evidence for a RAPID increase in the pace of anthropogenic climate destabilisation. Record low Antarctic sea ice extent, record Antarctic temperatures, proof of rapid changes to ocean circulation patterns in the Antarctic, and rapid derangement of the salt content of various strata of the ocean.
    Record low planetary albedo, a global darkening that increases the quantum of solar heat absorbed by the Earth system. A quickening of the weakening of the AMOC and the Gulf Stream, presaging climate catastrophe in Europe decades earlier than previously thought. A ‘mysterious and unexplained’ doubling of the quantum of heat trapped in the Earth system from 0.6 watts/metre 2 to 1.3 watts/ metre 2, from 2000 to present. And methane levels in the atmosphere are rapidly increasing in a ‘termination event’ (very appropriate wordage) caused by emissions from warming tropical wet-lands and fugitive emissions from millions of fracking wells in the USA.
    And in the face of these CATACLYSMIC realities, all this vile, brain-dead, libertarian cretin can come up with is his usual ‘plant-food’, ‘gas of life’ gibberish, and the outright falsehood that the increase in CO2 has been caused by ‘outgassing’ (from his arse). The close relationship between moral and spiritual Evil and intellectual insufficiency has rarely been more pronounced.

    • Replies: @True Blue
  201. @Fenrir_288

    Right. So anyone who advocates for the white race is, in fact, a Jew.

    Presumably all who advocate for open borders, race mixing, and “vibrant” culture, then, are true whites?

    Why is every claim made by you Jews absurd on its face?

  202. @mulga mumblebrain

    Mulga the Dried-up Old Spinster, writes:

    Cut out the middle-man, politicians, thus eliminating even the sorry pretense of rule by the plebs in a ‘democracy’, and let the moneyed elites rule directly

    In other words, Mulga prefers the current system. ie: the one we have now where those ‘wise overlords’ in Big Gubmint are preventing the oligarchs from running rampant. [End of sarcasm].

    How EFF’N STUPID would one be to not be aware that IT IS GUBMINT ITSELF THAT IS ENABLING THE MONEYED ELITE TO BECOME EVEN MORE ‘MONEYED’.

    When Gubmint was a tiny fraction of what it is today (ie: a century ago and more), there was a far more equitable distribution of wealth.
    Lowly and unskilled factory workers on a single income, could afford to have a stay-at-home wife and multiple children, while simultaneously purchase a home (and a new car every few years), and pay off the former in as little as 10-15 years if they avoided a profligate lifestyle.

    Can anyone living in a western country on low (or even a medium) income, say they’re capable of doing that today?
    Answer: No eff’n way.

    But UR readers, this is who Mulga is.
    She wants the masses to be further impoverished so that her dream of a One World Gubmint (run by a Jewish Bolshevist elite), can come to fruition.
    She is the same silly little tart that was gullible enough to swallow the ZOG conjured fable of Anthropogenic Global Warming.

    Seriously UR readers, I ask you this in all seriousness:
    Is there anyone remotely as retarded as the silly little cow Mulga?
    Meanwhile, I notice that Mulga posts this nonsense in another comment:

    Just in recent weeks we have seen scientific evidence for a RAPID increase in the pace of anthropogenic climate destabilisation.

    This little girl with the shrivelled up ovaries, also speaks about the ‘libido’ (or was it the ‘alfredo’ ?) of the planet.
    Of course, what we have seen in recent weeks (just as we’ve seen for many years), is a deluge of LIES and MENDACITY from the Climate Alarmists, as they make up ever more preposterous stories about climate armageddon to traumatise the kiddies.

    I mean these Klimate Kooks are making up shit all the time and concocting all manner of B.S terms out of their arses.

    [MORE]

    So, to the extent that some of our rainforests really are diminishing, let’s see who the actual culprit really is, by way of this video titled ‘Brazilian Rainforest CLEARED – To Prepare For a Climate Conference’:

    And while we’re at it, let’s watch the minute or so from 2:00-3:10 of the video below, and see for ourselves how those offshore wind turbines are killing whales by the thousands and causing untold damage to the remainder of the marine ecosystems, as shards of fibreglass and other toxic materials are ingested by marine life:

    UR readers, these left wing Net Zero Nitwits really are endangering the planet.
    For the sake of humanity, they should all be rounded up and locked away in an institution for the criminally insane.

  203. The cretin believes so much shite that you fear for the balance of its mind. In the USA equality was greatest when income tax on upper incomes was the highest ie after WWII. Of course this never suited the ‘libertardians’ of the business elites, so they changed it all after the Powell Memorandum of 1971, enacted by arch libertardian misanthropes Thatcher and Reagan.
    The current unprecedented inequality and elite wealth and power was deliberately created by the ruling elites, true libertardians. Turd is that sort of cretin who thinks that one day, he, too, will become a business parasite, so he adopts the Masters’ ethos-‘ Everything for me, and nothing for anyone else’, to paraphrase Adam Smith’s ‘Vile Maxim of the Rulers of Mankind’.
    Then like the rabid dog that it is, it returns to its vomitus. The findings of the rapid increase in the rate of climate destabilisation is dismissed, by this psychopathic moron, as ‘lies’, a case of projection so vicious and banal that only vermin like Turd would have the gall to utter it. All lies, all lies-anything that doesn’t fit the psycho’s EVIL and suicidal pathopsychology. As for ‘bullshit terms’, the cockroach simply means stuff that he is too fecking dumb to understand. This is what has destroyed humanity-rabid stupidity plus unbounded arrogance. Arsetralia is FULL of such insects.

  204. True Blue says:
    @mulga mumblebrain

    Sea levels were still 2 ft 9 in higher on the day Julius Caesar was murdered on the steps of the Roman Senate than they are today. We still haven’t entirely emerged from the medieval ice age yet.
    Lickspittle nonsense.

    • Replies: @mulga mumblebrain
  205. MoT says:
    @LavisHoppean

    Thanks for the pointers. I appreciate that.

  206. @True Blue

    Brain-dead, brainwashed, cretinism. Denialism is a Rightist death-cult, assiduously encouraged by fossil fuel interests. Did you know that sea-level rise is NOT uniform across the oceans? Bet not.
    And what of the other stuff? Melting montane glaciers, melting permafrost, record low Antarctic sea ice extent, record low Arctic sea ice volume. Record low planetary albedo (do you know what that means?) Greatly increased methane emissions, from tropical wet-lands and fugitive emissions from millions of fracking wells, record nitrous oxide emissions caused by derangement of the nitrogen cycle, record megafires, unprecedented deluges and floods, and deepening droughts often of rapid onset, sixth mass extinction crisis etc. Wanna denial ’em all, bozo? I bet you do-show off to your retarded mates. And there are many, many more.

  207. Liza says:

    Fracking has got to be banned.

    • Replies: @mulga mumblebrain
  208. “The quiet corridors of libertarian academia echoed with a familiar tension….. will he read my immature and predictable dribble or not?”

    I did not.

    I’m just here to point out that the author is named ‘Boy’.

    And anyone at all invested into ‘libertarianism’ should also be named ‘boy’.

    • Replies: @Truth Vigilante
  209. @i'm not sure

    And anyone at all invested into ‘libertarianism’ should also be named ‘boy’.

    It’s appropriate that you name yourself ‘I’m not sure’.
    Obviously you’re not well read and simultaneously economically illiterate.
    So it stands to reason that you’re not sure about anything.
    That’s because you’re INTELLECTUALLY BANKRUPT.

    And, not surprisingly, as with all those who smear libertarianism, they never state what ideology they subscribe to, or offer workable solutions to the problems facing western countries – esp. the USSA.
    I suspect what you hate most about Ron Paul libertarianism in particular, is that it is at the vanguard of a movement to End the Fed.

    And that really sticks in your craw.
    What would happen to your Talmudic pals that own the Federal Reserve if they didn’t have the capacity to conjure trillions from thin air and dole it out to themselves and their Jewish cronies?
    How would they be able to finance No-Expense-Spared False Flags like 9/11 and the Covid Psyop?

    In a nutshell, you’re one stupid eff’n cunt.
    It’s best you STFU from now on.

    • Replies: @mulga mumblebrain
  210. @Liza

    FAR TOO FUCKING late. There are millions of these things, leaking methane and polluting ground-water, often erupting in geysers of poisonous, radio-active, sludge, testament to capitalism’s death drive.

    • Replies: @Liza
  211. @Truth Vigilante

    ‘Libertarianism’, a form of Judeofascism like Chabad or the others, appeals to greedy misanthropes and morons. That is you to the life, troll.

  212. Liza says:
    @mulga mumblebrain

    It is a fallen world, Mulga.

    • Replies: @mulga mumblebrain
  213. @Liza

    A ‘falling’ word, Liz. It’s not hit the ground, yet.

    • LOL: Liza
Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply -


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
$
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Jose Alberto Nino Comments via RSS
PastClassics
From the Leo Frank Case to the Present Day
How America was neoconned into World War IV