
On the evening of April 6, 1994 a plane carrying the Hutu leaders of both Rwanda and Burundi was shot down as it approached Kanombe airport.[1]Servicing the capital city of Rwanda, Kigali. The assassins had little trouble targeting the flight as only one of the two runways was open, the other having been closed two months earlier on the orders of Canadian General Romeo Dallaire. Simultaneous to the shootdown, that is on the eve of April 6, a 30,000 RPF (Tutsi) army based in Uganda invaded from the north. At the same time, hundreds of covert armed RPF cells came to life in and around Kigali and began attacking Rwandan government forces (FAR). The population, roughly 85% Hutu, and encompassing at least a million refugees in and around Kigali displaced by previous RPF incursions from Uganda, began to panic. A genocide was about to begin.
But it was a genocide neither against, nor by, the actors cited in the ‘official’ narrative. Indeed, Rwanda circa 1994, is, in all likelihood, if not the, then certainly one of the greatest propaganda swindles of all time. This is the story of that swindle and of the scandalous truth that lies buried beneath it.
Historical Context
Prior to the arrival of Europeans, Rwanda was a feudal kingdom ruled by a Tutsi minority over a Hutu majority. Following the Berlin Conference of 1885 Rwanda came under the suzerainty of Germany which was, itself, replaced as colonial overlord following WW1, by Belgium. Rwanda’s feudal order remained intact, however, until 1956 when the Belgians finally organized elections. Then, in November 1959, the Hutu majority overthrew the Tutsi monarchy. Many Tutsis fled, the majority ending up, significantly, in Uganda. It was from this perch in Uganda that the exiled Tutsi aristocracy launched, between 1960 and 1973, a series of violent attacks against the Rwandan regime. These were repulsed and for the next decade and a half Rwanda enjoyed a period of relative peace.
It is worth noting at this juncture that, though much of the Tutsi aristocracy fled in 1960, those Tutsis who remained were well integrated into Rwandan society and body politic. Thus, both the government and army contained significant numbers of Tutsi personnel even through the height of the crisis in April 1994. In fact, the Rwandan Army (FAR) continued as a multi-ethnic organization even as it was forced to retreat into the forests of the Congo in July of 1994; this after having run out of ammunition due to a Western embargo on arms supplies – an embargo not applied to the RPF.
Up until 1990 there was no further interference in Rwanda from Uganda. Nevertheless, by then the Tutsis exiles living there had become one of the main elements of the Ugandan Army. As such, when Museveni came to power – having been handpicked by the US and Britain to oust the socialist, Milton Obote – a third or more of his army consisted of Tutsis. Many of these held high office, including Paul Kagame.
Kagame had been (and remains) an erstwhile client of Washington from well before he claimed to have ‘saved Rwanda from further genocide’ in 1994. Not only had he served as director of Ugandan military intelligence in the 1980s, but he had also received training at Fort Leavenworth, Kansas,[2]The US Army’s elite, commander general staff college devoted to the high-level planning of invasion scenarios. and had been the beneficiary of constant US material and diplomatic support from the moment he assumed control of the RPF.
Upon the collapse of the USSR in 1989/90 the US and the UK began a general militarist expansion which included the targeting of Yugoslavia and Rwanda; Yugoslavia as it was the last real bastion of working socialism in Europe, and Rwanda as it was a working model of socialist development in Africa. In addition, the US had turned against Mobutu (of Zaire, now the Democratic Republic of the Congo) as he was beginning to ally himself politically with China. The Rwandan president, Habyarimana, was subsequently approached by Washington to allow his country to be used as a staging ground for an attack on Zaire (to this day, a cornucopia of precious resources prized by the West). His refusal caused the US to look to other agents in furthering its strategic interests. They found the Tutsis in Uganda, ever thirsting for restoration of their hegemony in Rwanda. Furthermore, Museveni had begun to feel uneasy about the numbers of Tutsis in his ranks and was looking to be rid of them. The opportunity to satisfy these disparate desires soon came.
On October 1, 1990 the self-styled Rwandan Patriotic Front (RPF) launched a surprise attack from Uganda. Though calling themselves a force of ‘liberation’ the offensive was a thinly disguised invasion by Uganda itself. Initially, the justification for the invasion put out by the RPF was that of attaining the right of return of Tutsi refugees. This claim, however, was belied by the fact that Rwanda had, under UN auspices, already agreed a few weeks earlier to the return of all Tutsis who wished to do so. That accord required Tutsi representatives to travel to Kigali to determine both the logistics of that population movement and their subsequent accommodation within Rwanda. The delegation was expected at the end of September, 1990. They never arrived.
The attack killed tens of thousands of Rwandan civilians. These crimes, though well documented, have never been accounted for, nor did the UN or ‘international community’ ever seek to account for them. Indeed, there was not even a shred of condemnation of the Ugandan/RPF invasion, this despite the clamour raised only two months earlier with regard to the advance of Iraqi forces into Kuwait. In point of fact, the US and its allies supported the aggression against Rwanda and US Special Forces operated alongside the RPF from the beginning. This support notwithstanding, the small Rwandan army (with some help from a Congolese battalion) was eventually able to repel the invading forces.
Following this attempt using a proxy force to overthrow the state, the United States brought political and economic pressure to bear upon Rwanda’s one-party socialist state (MRND). The President, Juvenal Habyarimana, instead of resisting, agreed to alter the constitution and in 1991 Rwanda became a multi-party democracy. Though the Rwandan government effected this as an offer of peace, what followed was anything but peace. Thus, rather than work towards reconciliation, the RPF turned from the tactics of open warfare to those of guerrilla terrorism.
In 1992, and whilst RPF forces were busy planting mines, assassinating politicians and blaming it on the MRND, a coalition government was formed with the front parties of the RPF. These agents, with US backing, quickly seized control of key ministries and succeeded in appointing the Prime Minister. They also gained control of the intelligence services which they then began to dismantle. In essence, the ‘power sharing’ arrangement had largely given over control of the country to the very forces long bent on its destruction.
The RPF itself, meanwhile, engaged in a ‘talk and fight’ strategy; always agreeing to a ceasefire, pressing for more power, then launching new attacks on the civilian population. The most egregious of these assaults was their breaking of the ceasefire and the launching of a major offensive in February of 1993. Seizing the town of Ruhengeri, RPF forces murdered some 40,000, mostly Hutu, civilians. Once again, the ‘international community’ remained dutifully silent.
The Rwandan army, though hamstrung by the civilian ministries, managed to repulse the RPF attack. Finally, in August of 1993, the Arusha Accords were signed under pressure from the United States and its allies, and from which the RPF obtained major concessions. The Accords dictated the formation of a broad-based transition government to be followed by general elections.[3]This despite Museveni never having held an election from the time he shot his way into power in the mid 80s up to the present day. But for the RPF – as for the United States – there was a fatal fly in the electoral ointment. To wit, the RPF knew that they could not win such elections; this not only because they were unpopular with the majority (85%) Hutu population, but also because they had precious little support amongst many of Rwanda’s internal Tutsis whose lives and businesses they had destroyed. Rather than prepare for elections, the RPF prepared for something different.
UN reports document the massive build-up of men and weapons coming in from Uganda during this period. In fact, the UN force (UNAMIR) supposedly deployed to ensure a peaceful transition acted, instead, as a cover for the US and its allies, i.e. Britain, Belgium, Canada, to assist the illegal build-up. General Romeo Dallaire, the Canadian general in charge of the UN force, hid this build-up not only from the Rwandan Army and the President, but also from his immediate superiors, Jacques-Roger Booh-Booh and UN Secretary General Boutros Ghali. These machinations were accompanied by death threats against Habyarimana, threats made all the more significant by the murder of the first Hutu president of neighbouring Burundi, Melchior Ndadaye, by Tutsi officers in October 1993.[4]Ndadaye had won the country’s first free elections, and in the aftermath of his murder, 250,000 Hutus were massacred by the Tutsi army of Burundi, and hundreds of thousands fled to Rwanda.
The result of the 1993 RPF offensive was the forced migration of hundreds of thousands of Hutus from northern Rwanda towards Kigali so that by April, 1994 over a million refugees were encamped close to the capital and hundreds of thousands more in camps to the south. The RPF, meanwhile, did all it could to paralyze the functioning of the government, to exacerbate racial tensions, and to prepare for war.
Who Killed Habyarimana?
The triggering event in the ‘Rwandan genocide’ of 1994 is generally agreed to be the shooting down, on April 6, 1994, of the plane carrying Juvenal Habyarimana, the Hutu president of Rwanda, and Cyprien Ntaryamira, the Hutu president of Burundi. The official story has it that unidentified ‘Hutu rebels’ were the villains who targeted their own countrymen in some vague attempt to gain power. No evidence was ever adduced in support of this threadbare thesis, but in any case, even if so, the official villains failed spectacularly in their objectives as the country quickly fell to invading Tutsi forces leaving a small minority (Tutsi) population to rise like the Phoenix to its former position of national privilege and oligarchical control. No one in the Western mainstream media has ever commented on the exceeding peculiarity of this bizarre turn of events, never witnessed before, in which the supposed victims of a genocide end up as the victors of the conflict.
The paradox is soon resolved, however, if we countenance the much more likely scenario that the decapitation of the state leadership was the first stage in a final offensive of a war started four years earlier. That the assassination was part of an RPF coup d’etat is given further support by the fact that a 30,000 man RPF force was already marching against Kigali hours before the plane was destroyed, and that RPF forces inside Kigali were attacking government positions within hours of the shootdown. The Western audience, naturally, was, and has never since, been informed of these rather pertinent contextual facts surrounding the events of April 6, 1994. To boot, the official response to Habyarimana’s assassination was and has remained one of determined indifference; a strange thing given that it involved the highest official in the land. Even stranger given that, and according to virtually every independent expert on the subject, the ‘genocide of 1994’ simply would not have happened had Habyarimana not been assassinated. Nevertheless, though all the circumstantial evidence points towards the assassination being part and parcel of a US-backed RPF coup d’etat against the government of Rwanda, it would yet be helpful if there was direct evidence implicating RPF forces in the murder. There is.
As in one of those classic ‘B movie’ plot twists where the bad guys inadvertently hire a good guy who turns the table on his benefactors, so too did the lead official of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR) hire an investigator into the crash who turned out to be an honest man. Reporting back to Chief Prosecutor Louise Arbour in 1996/97, Australian lawyer, Michael Hourigan, found evidence directly linking the RPF (and the CIA) to the assassination. Far from pleasing Arbour, however, Hourigan’s diligence was rewarded with censure. According to Hourigan, Arbour became “aggressive” and “hostile” when informed of his findings. What Hourigan didn’t know at the time is that Arbour, after having launched the investigation, had been directed by US Secretary of State Madeleine Albright (who had handpicked her for the job) to quash the inquiry. And so she did. Arbour would later (again under the aegis of Albright) be promoted to Canadian Supreme Court Justice and thence as UN High Commissioner for Human Rights.
Hourigan’s report, though suppressed at the time, would, nevertheless, surface many years later in the hands of one of the defense teams at the ICTR. The report would also have its findings later corroborated by numerous sources. Thus, the French anti-terrorist judge Jean-Louis Bruguiere, having been called in to investigate the deaths of three French nationals who were aboard Habyarimana’s doomed flight, launched an exhaustive eight-year investigation. He concluded that the plane had indeed been destroyed by the RPF and that the assassination was part and parcel of Kagame et al’s plan to take over Rwanda by force. Bruguiere went on to issue nine warrants for the arrest of high-ranking members of the RPF whilst also requesting that the ICTR take up Kagame’s prosecution.
What’s more, not only have other French – and Spanish – legal officials since confirmed Bruguiere’s findings, but many highly placed members of the RPF have stepped forward publicly to implicate Kagame and the RPF in the assassination. All have suffered the same fate of official international silence and suppression, and some of the latter have suffered assassination themselves.[5]Assassinations by RPF agents of opponents to the regime have been many. Of note, however, two priests from Quebec, Claude Simard and Guy Pinard, were murdered Oct. 94 and Feb. 97 respectively. In addition, and rather chillingly, it is a matter of public record that a very long ‘hit list’ targeting opponents is, to this very day, sponsored by the Kagame regime.
This culture of suppression and official silence has also plagued the ICTR from its inception. In particular, it became the explicit policy of the ICTR to forcibly limit its mandate solely to the investigation of ‘genocidal intent’ by Hutu government figures, i.e. without any reference whatsoever either to the political context of the conflict or to the mounting evidence implicating the RPF as invaders and genocidaires. In short, the ICTR, much like its sister tribunal, the International Criminal Court for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY), proved itself from the outset to be little more than a Washington-sponsored kangaroo court.[6]Unlike the famous Nuremberg tribunal, the ICTR omits any reference to wars of aggression or foreign intervention (the ‘supreme international crime’ according to Nuremberg), and so, effectively, condones them. Moreover, the refusal to consider who instigated the war essentially runs cover for the instigators.
This transparently politicized policy has continued apace throughout the trials. When, for instance, the more independently-minded Carla Del Ponte replaced the pliable Louise Arbour, she was quickly terminated as Chief Prosecutor after calling for a ‘Special Investigation’ into the actions of the RPF; this despite making a case for such an investigation with then UN Secretary-General Kofi Anan. Of course, Anan’s refusal to look into the crimes of the RPF should come as no surprise as it was he who, a) was head of the peacekeeping operations in 1994, and is thus implicated in the events, and b) was handpicked by the US to replace his predecessor, Boutros-Ghali.
Boutros-Ghali, It might be remembered, had come uncomfortably close to scuttling the entire US/RPF invasion scenario when, in May of 1994, he acceded to a request by the Rwandan government to send 5500 UN troops to Rwanda to reinforce the 2500 already stationed there; this so as to stabilize the country at a time when reports of growing ‘chaos’ were issuing forth daily in the world press. These efforts were, however, categorically thwarted by the Clinton regime which used its influence to remove the proposal from the UN agenda. Instead, the UN troops already stationed there, far from being reinforced, were withdrawn. Later, Boutros-Ghali, in conversation with Rwandan expert Robin Philpot, would expand on these matters declaring that, “The genocide in Rwanda was 100% the responsibility of the Americans!”[7]More fully, “The genocide in Rwanda was 100% the responsibility of the Americans….The United States, with the energetic support of Great Britain, did everything they could to prevent the UN from sending troops to Rwanda to stop the fighting. And they succeeded”. Hardly any wonder, then, that in 1996 US Ambassador to the UN, the ubiquitous Madeleine Albright, would veto his re-election making Boutros-Ghali the only UN Secretary General in history not to be granted a second term in office.
Inconvenient Truths
On August 26, 2010 the French newspaper Le Monde revealed the existence of a draft UN report detailing the most serious human rights violations in the Democratic Republic of Congo over an eleven year period (1993 – 2003). The report described how, following the RPF’s takeover of Rwanda in 1994, it proceeded to carry out “systematic and widespread attacks” against Hutu refugees who had fled to neighbouring DRC. These attacks it stated, “could be classified as crimes of genocide.”
Save for it having been leaked to Le Monde, it is clear that the report was well on its way to being buried alive, its cover-up a near certainty. But this was hardly the first instance of a cover-up of a UN report vis a vis Rwanda. As early as October 11, 1994, Robert Gersony, an employee of the US Agency for International Development (USAID), then attached to the UN High Commissioner for Refugees, made an oral presentation to the UN Commission of Experts on Rwanda. Gersony had been dispatched to survey the situation inside Rwanda to determine if conditions were right for return of the Hutu refugees who had fled the RPF. Instead, he found that the RPF had been committing massacres of the Hutu population in Rwanda starting in April 1994 through the date of his presentation. On page 4 of the UN record of Gersony’s presentation (a record which surfaced in the defense proceedings at the ICTR), we read:
Significant areas…have been the scene of systematic and sustained [emphasis added] killing and persecution of the civilian Hutu population by the Rwandan Patriotic Front…..These actions were consistently reported to be conducted in areas where opposition forces of any kind – armed or unarmed, or resistance of any kind….were absent. Large scale indiscriminate killings of men, women and children, including the sick and elderly were consistently reported.
Now, I remind the reader that the killings detailed here were being perpetrated not, as in the official narrative, i.e. by Rwandan government troops, but by the supposed saviours of the country, i.e. the RPF.
Though much evidence surfaced early on that the official genocide narrative was in sharp disagreement with reality, all later independent reports have continued to corroborate this finding. In a 2004 paper, for instance (and reinforced in a more recent 2009 report), US academics Christian Davenport and Allan Stam concluded that, of the many hundreds of thousands of deaths (possibly as high as two million)[8]The exact numbers have never been definitively established. Initial reports claiming 800,000 were mostly pulled out of a hat. Still, later research (including testimony before the ICTR from former RPF officers themselves) seem to indicate that in the months following Habyarimana’s assassination, the numbers were, at the least, in the many hundreds of thousands, and possibly as high as two million. Hundreds of thousands of Hutus were also forced back to Rwanda at gunpoint starting in November of 1996, and hundreds of thousands more (possibly more than a million) were subsequently pursued and killed in the forests of the Congo. The Congolese themselves, of course, have suffered many millions (i.e. 5 to 10) killed in the US-backed RPF/Ugandan invasion and plundering of the east of the country since 1996. that occurred in Rwanda from April through July of 1994, the “majority of victims [at least two thirds] were likely Hutu and not Tutsi”. Noteworthy is the fact that Davenport and Stam were initially sponsored by the ICTR – that is until their findings contradicted the official narrative whence they were sent packing.
Still, Davenport and Stam have refrained from taking the implication of their own research to its logical conclusion, i.e. that Kagame’s forces were the only agents responsible for committing “systematic” killings in the areas they overran, or that such systemic violence was part of a pre-existing plan by the US-backed RPF to invade and overthrow the legitimate government, the latter in order to install a formerly privileged minority – and Western comprador elite[9]Evidence of this can be witnessed in the bilateral agreement that Rwanda, under Kagame, signed with the United States in 2003, giving each other immunity from prosecution; the former before the ICTR, and the latter before the International Criminal Court. Rwanda was also the only African country to back the US invasion of Iraq that same year. Moreover, much of the plunder of the Congo has since been funneled to the West through Kigali. – to power within Rwanda.
If the academics have been content to sit on the fence, not so one of the more famous lay figures of the Rwandan debacle. It is ironic in the extreme that Paul Rusesabagina, the real-life hero of the movie Hotel Rwanda – a film unashamedly promoting the official narrative – has himself, in numerous interviews, completely gainsaid that narrative. He has, thus, repeatedly denounced the RPF as the real genocidaires, and has called a Kagame a “war criminal” and “dictator” who is responsible for mass killings not only during the takeover of Rwanda in July 1994, but ever since both in Rwanda and in his US-backed incursions into the Congo. Indeed, so fervent have the denunciations been that Rusesabagina is now officially listed as a ‘terrorist’ and ‘genocide denier’ (a prisonable offence in Rwanda) by the Kagame regime.
No matter, the movie continues to circulate, sans critique; Rusesabagina’s views and denunciations, do not.[10]For an interview of Rusesabagina (by Keith Harmon Snow) go to: http://www.allthingspass.com/uploads/html-191The%20...L.htm.
Whose Genocide(s)?
It is something of an embarrassment to the US architects of the ICTR that the tribunal, though explicitly tasked with indicting only members of the Hutu government, have failed singularly in successfully prosecuting any of them.[11]That is, no government minister or military officer has, of the time of writing, been convicted of conspiracy to commit genocide. Of the 60 or so high-ranking members of the government that have been indicted, roughly a dozen have been acquitted, whilst the rest remain – twenty years after the event – on trial. Ordinary Hutu prisoners have been, through various legally illegitimate means, i.e. duress, threat, deception etc, induced to plead guilty. But again, no convictions bearing on the crime of ‘genocide’ has ever taken place. Moreover, the full extent of the criminality of the court setup and proceedings at the ICTR (even to the extent of assassinations of witnesses under UN custody) is worthy of an essay in and of itself. Indeed, the latter can be had (by contacting the author) vis a vis a paper, currently in manuscript, by ICTR defense lawyer Christopher C. Black (the ‘Rhodes Address’), and soon to be delivered in Rhodes, Greece. Not only have the most senior members of the MRND – through the spirited efforts of the various defense teams – been acquitted, but the mass of evidence so assembled has stood the entire official narrative on its head, and has implicated, au contraire, the RPF – and its foreign accomplices – in the genocide.
There was, however, one highly publicized piece of evidence proffered at the tribunal by prosecutors as they sought to prove a ‘planned genocide’ by the MRND government. This was the so-called ‘genocide fax’ allegedly sent to the New York UN headquarters on the night of January 10th, 1994. That this was the only piece of documentary evidence claiming direct planning of a genocide put forward in the trial is, itself, telling. Had there actually been such a plan (by the MRND), the logistics would have left a paper and/or electronic trail a mile wide. Instead, there are no orders, minutes of meetings, notes, cables, faxes, radio intercepts or any other type of documentation indicating that such a plan ever existed. And then, of course, there are the actual events on the ground which, as we have seen (and shall see further), suggest nothing of the sort. Nonetheless, there is the lone sepulchre of the ‘genocide fax’. What to make of it?[12]The case of the ‘genocide fax’ occupies a particularly important place in the ‘official’ narrative in as much as this was the only purported document, skimpy as it was, testifying to some measure of MRND conspiracy to a planned genocide. So important to the official storyline, in fact, that the ‘fax’ continues – despite having been exposed as a forgery before the ICTR – to be trotted out and adduced as ‘evidence’ to this very day.
To make a long story short, the fax is a forgery. There was a fax sent to the UN headquarters on January 10th, 1994 (a copy of a cable sent by Romeo Dallaire to another Canadian, General Baril), but this was not the fax that was entered into evidence in the Military II trial (ICTR vs Ndindiliyimana)[13]Specifically, ‘The ICTR vs General Augustin Ndindiliyimana’. Christopher C. Black was the lead defense counsel for Ndindiliyimana, the latter, having occupied the role of Chief of Staff of the Rwandan Gendamerie during the period in question. Ndindiliyimana was, just recently, acquitted of all charges at the ICTR. in October, 2005. Ndindiliyimana’s defense counsel was able to definitively establish that the original fax dealt only with ‘weapons caches and seeking protection for an informant’, whereas the fax subsequently entered as evidence, having first had time stamps, dates and paragraphs altered, had mysteriously sprouted an addendum about government plans to kill Tutsis and Belgian soldiers.[14]It was proved that this fake fax was put in UN files (to replace the original fax) by British Army Colonel, R.M. Connaughton, on November 28, 1995. Conflicting testimony both between Dallaire’s earlier and later statements, and between statements made by Dallaire and Lt. Col. Claeys (a Belgian officer who claims to be one of the authors of the original cable), further proved the document’s inauthenticity. Such was only reinforced when Dallaire’s immediate superior, Jacques Roger Booh-Booh, stated that he had never seen nor heard of the fax or any of its alleged inflammatory contents. Eventually, the ‘genocide fax’ was simply withdrawn as evidence by the court. Puff! One might wonder, then, why tens of thousands of MRND personnel are today still in prison, this whilst not one RPF figure has even been indicted. But so it is.
If documents supporting a pre-meditated plan by the MRND have failed to materialize, not so it turns out when it comes to the RPF. In the same trial that saw the outing of the fraudulent ‘genocide fax’, evidence was presented suggesting nothing other than a master plan by Kagame and “our Belgian, British and American collaborators” for the taking not only of Rwanda, but of Zaire. In a letter from Kagame to fellow Tutsi, Jean-Baptiste Bagaza of Burundi, dated August 10, 1994, Kagame thanks Bagaza for his help in “taking Kigali”. He then relates his communications with “our big brother Yoweri Museveni” and talks of “some modifications of the plan” noting that:
We have found that the presence of large numbers of Rwandan refugees at Goma, and the international community, can cause our plan for Zaire [emphasis added] to fail. We cannot occupy ourselves with Zaire until after the return of these Hutus….In any case, our external intelligence services continue to crisscross the east of Zaire, and our Belgian, British and American collaborators [emphasis added] the rest of Zaire. The action reports are expected in the next few days.
Now, what this letter seems to indicate is that the attack on Rwanda (from 1990 onward) was not the prime objective of Kagame and crew after all, but was, rather, merely the gateway to an attack on Zaire/Congo. The significance of the latter became apparent when, on November 1, 1996, the aforementioned Goma was, in fact, attacked and taken by the RPA (the re-named RPF) along with Burundian and Ugandan forces. This assault was heavily backed by the United States and eyewitness accounts tell of large American cargo planes filled with arms landing in Kigali in the last two weeks of October, 1996. The taking of Goma was, it is pertinent to note, the prelude to the ensuing genocidal carnage that has overtaken the Democratic Republic of the Congo ever since. To properly understand this last statement we need to backtrack a bit to April 6, 1994, and look at the events that unfolded immediately following the assassination of Habyarimana.
• • •
Once the plane had been shot down, an RPF army, as noted earlier, invaded from the north whilst armed RPF cells began attacks inside Kigali itself. These cells represented some 15,000 or so troops that the RPF had illegally secreted into Kigali under Dallaire’s watch [As the UNAMIR force commander he was charged with the responsibility of allowing, under the Arusha Accords, no more than 600 RPF into the city]. In the sector of Kigali known as Remera the RPF killed everyone on the night of the 6th and 7th, wiped out the gendarme camp there, wiped out the military police camp at Kami and launched major attacks against Camp Kanombe, Camp Kigali, and the main gendarme camp at Kacyriu.
The Rwanda government and army called for a ceasefire that same night and the next day. The RPF rejected the call. The Rwandan government then asked for UN help to control the situation. Instead, the US arranged that the main UN force be pulled out whilst flying in men and supplies to the RPF using C130 Hercules aircraft. The Rwandan Army, short of ammunition and unable to contain the RPF advances offered an unconditional surrender on April 12th. The RPF rejected this offer and began shelling the Nyacyonga refugee camp, where the one million Hutu refugees were located, so provoking their flight into the capital.
The effect of one million people flooding into a small city that itself was under bombardment caused mayhem and panic. To make matters worse, the RPF used this flood of people to infiltrate its men behind FAR lines. This heightened to fever pitch the panic amongst the Hutu population who then began killing anyone they did not recognize. The late Dr. Alison Des Forges (a noted expert on Rwanda), in her testimony before the Military II trial at the ICTR in 2006 stated that the RPF claim that they attacked to stop a ‘genocide’ was a myth; just propaganda to justify their attempt to seize power by force of arms. She also testified that the Rwandan government did not plan and execute genocide. This accords with the (early) testimony of Romeo Dallaire who confirmed that there was no planned genocide by the MRND. In addition, the deputy head of Belgian Army intelligence, Col. Vincent, similarly testified that the idea of an MRND-backed genocide was a complete fantasy.
The fighting in Kigali was intense. UN officers – confirming testimony made by FAR and RPF officers before the ICTR – state that the RPF was launching hundreds of Katyusha rockets every hour around the clock whilst the Rwandan Army ran out of grenades in the first few days and were reduced to fighting with hand-made explosives. Nevertheless, the siege of Kigali lasted three months and only ended when the Rwandan Army literally ran out of all ammunition and thence ordered a general retreat into the forests of the Congo.
RPF officers testifying before the ICTR have stated that the RPF killed up to two million Hutus in those 12 weeks in a deliberate campaign to eliminate the Hutu population. The Akager River, the length of which was under RPF control throughout, ran red with the blood of Hutu victims massacred on its banks. It is here that Robert Gersony’s report, filed as an exhibit before the ICTR, lends support to this testimony and to the fact of a systematic and planned RPF massacre of the Hutu population.
As the Rwandan Army (including its Tutsi officers) retreated into the Congo forest, the Hutu population, in fear for their lives, fled with them in their millions. Meanwhile, in local villages, Hutu neighbours attacked Tutsis either in revenge for the murder of Hutus or fearing death at their hands. Tutsis also attacked Hutus. It was total war, though a war clearly fuelled and instigated by the US-backed RPF invasion.
The RPF later pursued the Hutus through the Congo forest and, between 1996 and 1998, killed hundreds of thousands and possibly millions. All the while the RPF was assisted by the United States. Thus, the US cynically thwarted plans (in November 1996) devised by the French and the European Union to send a 10,000 man UN force to assist and guarantee the safe return of the refugees; a plan which if it had been effected would likely have forestalled the ensuing multi-million death toll in the Congo. Moreover, the UN Rwanda Emergency office in Nairobi was, in fact, manned by US Army officers and acted as the operational headquarters of the RPF. Finally, not only did US Special Forces fight alongside the RPF during this period, but intercepted radio messages from Kagame to his forces in the field suggest that both Belgian and Canadian forces were involved as well.
Operating, then, under the Orwellian pretext of ‘hunting for genocidaires’, Kagame & Co. conducted a decade long invasion/occupation of Zaire/Congo. The overall strategic thrust of this assault was threefold. First, it was an attack on French interests in Africa, interests that were immediately taken over by the United States. Second, the assault was part and parcel of the overthrow of Mobutu (toppled in May of 1997). Ultimately, however, the capture of the Congo was about booty. As such, this single treasure chest contains not only large deposits of diamonds, gold, copper, uranium and tantalum (used in computers and cell phones), but also much of the world’s reserves of chrome, platinum and cobalt.
To the question then, ‘Whose genocides were they?’, the answer yet resounds through the din of propaganda, ‘They were ours’.
Shaking Hands with the Devil
In assessing responsibility for the tragedy of Rwanda – and the ensuing events in Zaire/Congo – we must not stop at those already indicted in this essay. For none of this could have happened without the overt complicity of numerous ‘humanitarian’ NGOs including especially, Human Rights Watch, which, in the early days prior to the RPF’s final solution, headed up a totally bogus, unsubstantiated report (issued March 6, 1993) condemning (and so de-legitimizing in advance) the Rwandan government for a ‘genocide’ that, in fact, had yet to take place – and which would, in the event, be committed by the very agents it conspired to defend, i.e. the RPF. And, naturally, none of this could have happened without the willing complicity of the Western mass media who swallowed hook, line and sinker every piece of propaganda issued by the Clinton Administration.[15]Though special ‘commendation’ should go to Philip Gourevitch of the New Yorker, who was instrumental in propagandizing on behalf of the Clinton Administration and the RPF. Gourevitch was also the brother-in-law of Jamie Rubin, the right-hand man of, then, US Secretary of State, Madeleine Albright.
As Canadians we are more than ordinarily complicit as it was the Canadian government (under Jean Chretien) that worked hand-in-glove with the Americans throughout this period. In particular, of course, three Canadians, Louise Arbour, General Maurice Baril and General Romeo Dallaire played leading roles in the ‘affair’. For services rendered they were, all three, handsomely rewarded: Arbour, as already mentioned, with promotion as Supreme Court Justice and thence as UN High Commissioner for Human Rights; Baril with promotion to Chief of Staff of the Canadian Armed Forces (in Sept. 1997), and Dallaire with appointment as Canadian Senator for life.
Of the three, however, Dallaire’s role is particularly noteworthy, for it is he who has, ever since, been portrayed, and portrayed himself, as a hero in the Rwandan tragedy; and who has, as such, been pre-eminently involved in spreading and maintaining the Big Lie with respect to it. Dallaire’s 2003 epic, Shake Hands With the Devil,[16]Dallaire published his book three years after another Canadian author, Carol Off, published her hagiography (‘The Lion, The Fox and The Eagle’) on Dallaire, Arbour and Lewis Mackenzie. Both Dallaire and Off, it turns out, relied on the same ghostwriter / researcher, Sian Cansfield, whence the existence of passages of the first volume lifted straight into the second. Both belong on the fiction list. an ironically named Faustian tract, fails spectacularly to elucidate the author’s otherwise well documented actions during the events.
It is well established, for instance, that Dallaire knew of – and, effectively, facilitated – the build-up of RPF forces inside Kigali prior to Habyarimana’s assassination. It is well established that Dallaire, rather than reporting to and receiving orders from the UN, as was his mandate, was, instead, reporting and receiving instructions from American military commanders. It is also a fact that Dallaire, only two months prior to the assassination of Habyarimana, closed down one of the only two runways[17]More accurately, one of the two axes of the one runway was closed. into Kigali airport – upon request of the RPF. It is also the case that Dallaire covered up the massacre by the RPF of MRND people elected in by-elections in the north of Rwanda in November, 1993. Evidence presented at the ICTR further implicates Dallaire in supplying intelligence to Kagame and the RPF forces throughout the period leading up to April 6, 1994.
Whenever Dallaire has faced formal questioning regarding his actions in Rwanda his testimony has been strictly managed and censored. Attempts by independent journalists and investigators to interview and question him have met with refusal and/or silence. And those questions are many and serious. Apart from the items already listed, they include:
How did the lady prime minister, Agathe Uwilingiyimana, come to be murdered at the UN development compound (the morning after Habyarimana had been assassinated) just a short time after he, Dallaire, arrived there? Why did he do nothing to save the lives of the Belgian UN soldiers – suspected of being the team that shot down Habyarimana’s plane – who were subsequently killed at Camp Kigali? Why, and under whose command, did Belgian army units in certain strategic positions in Kigali abandon them and all their weapons to the RPF? Why did UN army units attack MRND army units, but never the RPF? Why did he fail to report that US forces, using Hercules C-130 aircraft, were supplying men and weapons to the RPF? Why, when Dallaire had his headquarters at Amahoro stadium in Kigali after April 6 through the rest of the month, did he allow RPF forces to enter and subsequently murder Hutu refugees who had fled there for safety? And, of course, why did he lie about the ‘genocide fax’ of January 11, 1994?
Still, all in all, Dallaire was merely a bit player in a much larger drama, a drama written and produced in Washington, D.C.
Of Credibility and Credulity
In the two decades that have elapsed since the overthrow of the Rwandan government – and the subsequent killing of millions of it’s peoples, and those millions more killed in the Congo – the Big Lie has flourished virtually unabated. Though the likes of Robin Philpot (‘Rwanda and the New Scramble for Africa’), and Ed Herman and David Peters (‘The Politics of Genocide’) have, of late, lent this revised narrative a slightly higher profile, more generally – and notably amongst the Left – the ‘official’ narrative of Rwanda circa 1994 continues to hold sway. So much so that Rwanda has become, in Philpot’s resonant phrasing, “a useful imperial fiction”, i.e. a shining example of the ‘need for intervention’ that is deployed whenever and wherever ‘humanitarian imperialism’ seeks to invade and destroy nations opposed to it.
It need not be so. At the very least amongst the Left, it should never have been so. In the early days of the Rwandan debacle, one anomalous event stands out like the proverbial sore thumb transparently pointing the way to what was really ‘going down’ in the beleaguered nation. That event was the majority withdrawal in May of 1994 of the UN troops stationed in Rwanda, i.e. essentially clearing the way for the unobstructed overthrow of the government. This one item alone, irrespective of the fact that the corporate media habitually lies about virtually all matters of significant political import, should have tipped off observers of the Great Game to the idea that something rotten was taking place in the state of Rwanda. But it didn’t. And that, given what subsequently transpired in Yugoslavia and later Libya – where again, significant sectors of the Left bought into the official narrative – and given what is today transpiring in Syria and Ukraine, is problematic.
If there is one lesson, then, that we can take from the tragic events adumbrated herein – and, though hardly new, is a notion that bears vigorously reinforcing – it is that whatever information is fed us by the state and by the corporate mass media with regard to fundamental global strategic happenings, the only historically consistent and logical stance to take is to assume that the truth lies 180 degrees in the opposite direction. This should be our default position, until proof is rendered otherwise, in every instance.
In the meantime, to bear witness to the truth of what really happened in Rwanda falls to you. As Noam Chomsky once wrote with regard to an earlier suite of imperial crimes, ‘For yours is an historic mission, and one you should not soon forget.’
Footnotes
[1] Servicing the capital city of Rwanda, Kigali.
[2] The US Army’s elite, commander general staff college devoted to the high-level planning of invasion scenarios.
[3] This despite Museveni never having held an election from the time he shot his way into power in the mid 80s up to the present day.
[4] Ndadaye had won the country’s first free elections, and in the aftermath of his murder, 250,000 Hutus were massacred by the Tutsi army of Burundi, and hundreds of thousands fled to Rwanda.
[5] Assassinations by RPF agents of opponents to the regime have been many. Of note, however, two priests from Quebec, Claude Simard and Guy Pinard, were murdered Oct. 94 and Feb. 97 respectively. In addition, and rather chillingly, it is a matter of public record that a very long ‘hit list’ targeting opponents is, to this very day, sponsored by the Kagame regime.
[6] Unlike the famous Nuremberg tribunal, the ICTR omits any reference to wars of aggression or foreign intervention (the ‘supreme international crime’ according to Nuremberg), and so, effectively, condones them. Moreover, the refusal to consider who instigated the war essentially runs cover for the instigators.
[7] More fully, “The genocide in Rwanda was 100% the responsibility of the Americans….The United States, with the energetic support of Great Britain, did everything they could to prevent the UN from sending troops to Rwanda to stop the fighting. And they succeeded”.
[8] The exact numbers have never been definitively established. Initial reports claiming 800,000 were mostly pulled out of a hat. Still, later research (including testimony before the ICTR from former RPF officers themselves) seem to indicate that in the months following Habyarimana’s assassination, the numbers were, at the least, in the many hundreds of thousands, and possibly as high as two million. Hundreds of thousands of Hutus were also forced back to Rwanda at gunpoint starting in November of 1996, and hundreds of thousands more (possibly more than a million) were subsequently pursued and killed in the forests of the Congo. The Congolese themselves, of course, have suffered many millions (i.e. 5 to 10) killed in the US-backed RPF/Ugandan invasion and plundering of the east of the country since 1996.
[9] Evidence of this can be witnessed in the bilateral agreement that Rwanda, under Kagame, signed with the United States in 2003, giving each other immunity from prosecution; the former before the ICTR, and the latter before the International Criminal Court. Rwanda was also the only African country to back the US invasion of Iraq that same year. Moreover, much of the plunder of the Congo has since been funneled to the West through Kigali.
[10] For an interview of Rusesabagina (by Keith Harmon Snow) go to: http://www.allthingspass.com/uploads/html-191The%20Grinding%20Machine%20interview%20with%20Paul%20Rusesabagina%20FINAL.htm.
[11] That is, no government minister or military officer has, of the time of writing, been convicted of conspiracy to commit genocide. Of the 60 or so high-ranking members of the government that have been indicted, roughly a dozen have been acquitted, whilst the rest remain – twenty years after the event – on trial. Ordinary Hutu prisoners have been, through various legally illegitimate means, i.e. duress, threat, deception etc, induced to plead guilty. But again, no convictions bearing on the crime of ‘genocide’ has ever taken place. Moreover, the full extent of the criminality of the court setup and proceedings at the ICTR (even to the extent of assassinations of witnesses under UN custody) is worthy of an essay in and of itself. Indeed, the latter can be had (by contacting the author) vis a vis a paper, currently in manuscript, by ICTR defense lawyer Christopher C. Black (the ‘Rhodes Address’), and soon to be delivered in Rhodes, Greece.
[12] The case of the ‘genocide fax’ occupies a particularly important place in the ‘official’ narrative in as much as this was the only purported document, skimpy as it was, testifying to some measure of MRND conspiracy to a planned genocide. So important to the official storyline, in fact, that the ‘fax’ continues – despite having been exposed as a forgery before the ICTR – to be trotted out and adduced as ‘evidence’ to this very day.
[13] Specifically, ‘The ICTR vs General Augustin Ndindiliyimana’. Christopher C. Black was the lead defense counsel for Ndindiliyimana, the latter, having occupied the role of Chief of Staff of the Rwandan Gendamerie during the period in question. Ndindiliyimana was, just recently, acquitted of all charges at the ICTR.
[14] It was proved that this fake fax was put in UN files (to replace the original fax) by British Army Colonel, R.M. Connaughton, on November 28, 1995.
[15] Though special ‘commendation’ should go to Philip Gourevitch of the New Yorker, who was instrumental in propagandizing on behalf of the Clinton Administration and the RPF. Gourevitch was also the brother-in-law of Jamie Rubin, the right-hand man of, then, US Secretary of State, Madeleine Albright.
[16] Dallaire published his book three years after another Canadian author, Carol Off, published her hagiography (‘The Lion, The Fox and The Eagle’) on Dallaire, Arbour and Lewis Mackenzie. Both Dallaire and Off, it turns out, relied on the same ghostwriter / researcher, Sian Cansfield, whence the existence of passages of the first volume lifted straight into the second. Both belong on the fiction list.
[17] More accurately, one of the two axes of the one runway was closed.

RSS









Edward S Herman, with co-author David Peterson, exposed the lies of the ‘Rwanda genocide’ in ‘The Politics of Genocide’ in 2010. Later he squashed George Monbiot, in idiot mode, over the controversy. It’s a lie as big as the Uighur genocide, Tian An Men Square Massacre, Russian invasion of Ukraine, Saddam’s WMD etc, yet the Western fakestream media presstitute vermin still peddle them, without hesitation. God curse them all!!
Excellent story, it has elements of today’s global crimes committed by the usual cast and crew. They seem to be the primary culprits in most all that is evil.
Yup. Crushing socialist countries by killing all of the socialists. That’s the all-American/Canadian/Belgian/French, etc., way.
Socialism doesn’t work because tender, sweet, loving capitalists kill them all.
Otherwise it would work. It’s not rocket science.
Yes. I have read enough of these kinds of alternative narratives, mostly on Unz, to begin to notice a pattern, i.e., Washington behind the scenes, manipulating, killing, stealing resources. I think taking the opposite tack of what the fakestream media presents, unless the facts prove otherwise, is an excellent strategy.
What about Libya——-it had the highest standard of living in Africa and Gaddafi wanted a United States of Africa—perhaps too much for the USA to handle–direct competition. Crimea was a referendum and coming soon should be a referendum in Taiwan—-……Tianamen Tankman –lives –tanks were in reverse and after they backed up a few meters more the Tankman walked across the avenue —sat on a park bench —and then went home.. If the photo was true —-then a couple of seconds later he would be a squshed Tianamen tankman under the treads and a red puddle on the road —yes???
I know very little about Rwanda, except that tutsis are tall and hutus are short (or is it the opposite?), however, given all the outrageous lies we’ve been fed all these years by the U.S. and NATO about Serbia, Iraq, Syria, Libya, Crimea, etc, I have no reason to disbelieve the author. Western leaders lie and lie. It’s almost as if they were psychopaths…
There are many deeds the “leaders” of the “free world” did since 1990 that are too much dark and inhuman; I used to believe that truth will leak out in course of time, but after seeing that many events are still twisted in our popular narratives- like the Assassination of JFK, the death of an Australian PM, 9/11 and all – now I have lost hope that truth will ever surface. Worse, even when truth surfaces, people would have lost their capacity to recognize it as such.
Cool sources, bro. We totally should trust you on your word, because it is not like socialists and their sympathizers have an extended history of lying and ascribing their own crimes to others, right?
Mr. Black, all due respect, your mishmash of the timeline of the Clinton administration’s machinations in Africa for ten years is really a who’s who of instigation towards this notion of what Clinton’s people
considered nigger vs. nigger. That’s how Clinton’s people including Hillary used to speak of them. And they and their masters at CIA didn’t give a shit if 30+ thousand genocides took place 20 times in ten years because: resources. This because that’s the overriding theme in the quest in all this, for resources. The “Apartheid” White South African government had to be defeated to more easily enable theft of resources and also to set up what they had in mind for the United States 30 years hence. And what, 200,000 careerists at Department of State were needed to implement all this? Who got those 300,000 dollar-a-year jobs? And (((WHO))) sits on the boards of the companies that desperately needs those resources today 3 decades later? Wanna talk swindlers?
Methinks Mr. Black is another who is paid to show the problem but not the instigators responsible. Appreciate the research but not the ultimate conclusion. THAT is seriously flawed. Mr. Black is clearly compromised. This entire treatise by Black is a cloak, a beard. Fact is, tens of millions were killed. Didn’t make a dent, did it? 4 billion by 2030? Five? Six?
Best part? Now they’re competing with the chinks, the enemy Clinton handed our jobs to. Thirty years later, still fighting for resources on behalf of board members.. Gotta love it. Nothing changes.
A byzantine tale of lies and subterfuge similar to 9-11 and our present day Faucian plandemic
Sites such as gatewaypundit have a perpetual hard on for Russia. Every week you can count on some screed burbling forth about the “invasion” of Ukraine and the takeover of Crimea. Plus they constantly harp on the Iranians as though 1979 was yesterday and we must always “Remember the Maine!”
I only read the first and last paragraphs but I can tell you as a Tutsi ‘aficionado’ they are the master race of the area and should kill another million Hutus if they act up and then should be sent to west Africa, Nigeria et al, and kill millions there.
The scourge of humanity is the overpopulation of blacks, it should be checked by whatever means possible.
15% of the population dominating the other 85% is obviously a formula for instability and recurrent upheaval. As noted, the propaganda narrative of the US predominates and is used as a pretext for more aggression around the world; we didn’t ‘do enough’ last time hence should get more involved in the future. All this was made in the USA, Kagame being our client and arms, training being secretly supplied. This is a formula the US has followed for many years now and works well in weaker, poorer parts of the world. The US has been on a tear since ’45, destroying the lives of millions around the globe in grabs for resources even as it postures itself as a human rights crusader. The American propaganda machine is the largest and most pervasive lie apparatus in the history of the world.
“with regard to fundamental global strategic happenings, the only historically consistent and logical stance to take is to assume that the truth lies 180 degrees in the opposite direction. This should be our default position, until proof is rendered otherwise, in every instance.”
Yes. This is exactly how the individual needs to start to think with regard to events such as, for example, WW1, WW2, JFK, the moon landings, the Vietnam war, 9/11, the current “pandemic” , the “vaccines” etc. Etc.
Never believe anything _any_ government, or its MSM propagandists, tells you. 99% of the time, it’s complete and utter lies.
“My first rule- I don’t believe anything the government tells me- nothing!- ZERO!” George Carlin
Video Link
Regards, onebornfree
Thanks for an interesting read.
One thing to examine would be: did the frequency, lethality and blatantness of “humanitarian” interventions increase during the 90s, when Western bigshots and aparatchiks felt freer to pursue their interests and propaganda after the collapse of their rival? And is it decreasing now because Western bigshots and aparatchiks are once again facing powerful rivals?
Very interesting article; until now, I had always been convinced that the Rwandan genocide was the savage extermination of 1.5 million Tutsis by Hutus with clubs and machetes in 6 weeks.
I did not know the background. Now I have a completely different perspective.
This is the great lesson of the article; thank you Antony C. Black.
The author states that the official narrative of the event was a propaganda swindle. This “swindle” was of course propaganda with all the supporting research, analysis, interviews etc. Therefore we should not believe it.
He then presents his narrative refuting the official “swindle” with all his supporting research, analysis, interviews etc. This we are supposed to believe.
I imagine in a few years some other writer will come up with another story line refuting everything and asserting other facts with all the supporting research, analysis and so on.
Which is true ? Which is false ? Who knows ? I don’t ! Two people see the same accident and have different accounts. How accurate can be the account of someone who was never there ? How accurate can the account be of someone who was there ? No doubt, many on UR will gush at this new twist and discount the original.
In the midst of all this narrative and counter narrative I suggest a more sensible approach. Believe nothing ! We live in a world of liars and lies and what is true and what is false depends on the motive of the speaker and the gullibility of the listener.
In any case we have enough problems of our own with the blacks in this country. Who cares if 500,000 get wiped out by their own in the continually upside down and dysfunctional continent of Africa !
Probably connected to the fact that the American State was/is the most powerful State machinery ever built until recently/now.
The Rwandan Genocide was carried out by Primitive Untermensch on Primitive Untermensch, as has been happening on the African continent for time immemorial. Stop with the White Devil blaming, as the African Primitive Untermensch own this one.
Even Romeo Dallaire himself, in his extremely self-serving book Shake Hands With The Devil, admits that the RPF was – under the Arusha Accord’s terms – in physical occupation of the National Assembly in Kigali, had a large force in the city, and – he said – could have ended the (fictional) “genocide of Tutsis” at any time it wanted, but Kagame – whom of course Dallaire fawns over – wanted to prolong the bloodshed for political benefit.
The ultimate breakdown of the propaganda is the fate of Paul Rusesabagina, the hero of the film Hotel Rwanda. The real Rusesabagina always said that the film is fiction, and that Kagame is a dictator. For his pains he was kidnapped from the UAE and is now in a Rwandan jail. While the so called Hutu dictatorship in 1994 didn’t touch a hair on his head despite his alleged saving of hundreds of Tutsis.
As long as the USA received thousands of Rwandan refugees, nothing was in vain.
War is hell and the winners write its history. Usually. The lies told about WW2 still persist, prison awaits those who disagree with the official history in many countries. In Germany they lock up 90 year olds over ridiculous charges. Everywhere, in every country on earth, we are ruled by psychopaths. Maybe everyone of us, or 99% anyway, given enough power, becomes a psychopath?
CAREFULLY OVERLOOKED: 50% of Rwandans are roman catholics i.e. members of a murderous pedophile death cult overseen by the vile Whore of the Seven Hills.
ANOTHER MASS GRAVE IN OUR NORTHERN COLONY: 750 dead children located in a mass unmarked grave in Saskatchewan on catholic property……no death certificates, no documentation, just the remains of dead kids queered by sadistic homo priests.
Instead of being outlawed as a kiddie rape cult and the perps prosecuted, the abominable papist rapist cult is fully subsidized by the taxpayer…..no property taxes on their vast holdings. Subsidize something and you will get a lot more of it.
tldr. Such articles should be shortened to an “Executive Summary” or an “Elevator Pitch” with links.
It’s not rocket science.
I didn’t not read it because I don’t “care”, I didn’t read it because it was too long. I’m not the author’s whore and my money is NOT on the dresser.
But The Palestinian Genocide by APARTHEID Israhell is alive and well.
Beware: Extremely Graphic Images http://bit.ly/2CUicmZ
and of course…the Power of The Cabal.
The democrat media ignored: Husssein’s imaginary nuclear weapons, US funded Wuhan virus lab, election fraud, racial crimes, failing schools, organ harvesting by Planned Parenthood, etc. etc.
That should be standard operating procedure for any thinking individual. But in reality, one should doubt everything the elite tell us until proven otherwise e.g. this Scamdemic. One interesting thing I find about people, in general, is their seemingly absolute inability to comprehend that corporate bodies–governments, businesses, etc. take on personalities that mirror those of an individual. If someone you know is a pathological liar why would you ever believe them sans verifiable evidence? Yet people believe their government even when its psychopathology becomes well known. You invite your own destruction and deserve it, but you will whine and cry as though you are innocent even though you have known all along.
Good article. It is hardly surprising that the narrative pushed by the US government and Western bought and paid for media is 100 percent false: the same is true about their narrative on Yugoslavia.
The author is right: whenever the State Department and the MSM claim that something is black, it is most likely white
For decades the west has seen non stop commercials for the starving poor in Africa. Most of that aid made dictators billionaires. The best book on Africa is by Paul Kenyan, Dictatorland: The Men who Stole Africa. Yes, BILLIONAIRE dictators while the masses starve. Go figure.
enlightening article, as if we needed anymore reason to hate madeline albright. there is a special place in hell for neoliberal neocons red and blue.
Monsieur Black
Good and factual article.
France has been accused of having enginered the slaughter at that time. As a militant of the association Survie (dealing often with relevance with the ‘Françafric’), I have personaly been duped by the propaganda spreading at that time telling we collectively as French were responsible and that our government had planed a ‘genocide’. In the following decades,the political establishment has play it’s role of proconsul of the US and consort and accepted the official version ever since, giving credence to Kagamé, who is a genuine psychopath.
Of course, the military, knowing the truth, has never really swallowed the case. One journalist has relentlessly worked to bring the truth. This year, he has published a book which has been on alternative medias of different political orientation but with a globaly wide audience in the country. This guy is Charles Onana, I guess you know him. He is a very bright and courageous man.
Video Link
Merci
This article is so excellent, accurate, and needed. God damn all the feel-good idiots who embrace all the dishonest pro-war narratives used over and over again by humanitarian interventionists. Which are _always_ false and _always_ play on Western liberals’ feeling of superiority and need for virtue signalling.
I was aware of the falsity of the official story while it was happening (may Mark Doyle, the BBC correspondent there then, burn in hell forever for his active cover-up of what was going on then: for example, the toppling government’s violence was always “systematic” and the RPF violence not, etc, etc), because the official story was so nonsensical. The books by Edward S. Herman and David Peterson (The Politics of Genocide, and the subsequent Enduring Lies: The Rwandan Genocide in the Propaganda System, 20 Years Later) confirmed it. This article adds even more information and makes an airtight case against the US government and the evil pieces of sh*t Paul Kagame, Romeo Dallaire, and Louise Arbour.
The US/Western Empire is responsible for the unnecessary, brutal deaths of millions and millions of people since WW II. Where are the museums for this ONGOING holocaust?
It must be added the Charles Onana is a doctor in political science. I said he is courageous because, as you can guess, he has been wildly attaked, even being labaled a ‘negationist’ whereas none of his books having ever been sued. He has written many books. His thesis in doctorates was titled “Rwanda,l’Opération Turquoise et la Controverse Médiatique”. Rwanda, operation Turquoise and the mediatic controversy.
The guy gives many interesting analysis and detailed informations
Takeaways –
Never put your trust in Canadians or someone named Jacques Roger Booh-Booh
Send out effective pickets and scouting elements when encamped
Bill Clinton / Epstein puppet is and was pure evil incarnate.
FUKUS standard MO
Exhibit Sudan
https://www.globalresearch.ca/brief-history-cia-dirty-war-south-sudan/5685393
We’re going to see this exact story play out again in Ethiopia when the U.S. supports the Tigray People’s Liberation Front’s efforts as a favor to Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus. Susan Rice took money from the TPLF
Being from Canada, I’m beginning to develop some serious resentment against the last two of these “pieces of sh*t”. Dallaire at least appears to have had pangs of conscience over his role, suffering from periodic bouts of alleged depression, we’re told. Perhaps there’s hope for a deathbed confession.
The piece that sucked me in to believing the official story for so long was Stephen (((Sholem))) Lewis. Heralded as one of Canada’s finest orators, he could go on for hours spouting moral indignation after moral indignation. He helped write an Organization of African Unity report that portrayed the RPF as coming to Kigali trying to stop the genocide and invading the Congo to disarm the alleged Genocidaires. A total crock.
https://www.democracynow.org/2000/7/11/the_rwanda_genocide_how_does_madeleine
A great article Antony. It would be great if you could expound on how they managed to pull the wool over our eyes for so long. Also tell us who were dupes and who were the co-conspirators.
At the very least, the proper thing to do is let people choose and suffer or prosper under an economic and political system of their choice, rather than unduly influence or ruin their attempt at advancement.
It won’t be some enough when these manipulative elites and the masses who enable them are punished for their sins.
The son of Kenya did his fatherland….
https://www.voltairenet.org/article162559.html
Operation Crimson Mist
Electronic Slaughter in Rwanda
This genocide in Rwanda, much like the currently ongoing “Plandemic”, the BLM riots in the summer of 2020, the riots and looting in Baghdad, and likely many other color revolutions are the result of experimental MKUltra style mind control using EM emissions. This is why we need to be so worried about plans for 5g across the planet and the injection of mRNA experimental therapy using EM sensitive nanoparticles. Has anyone here been watching all the #magnetchallenge videos?
https://educate-yourself.org/cn/americanmcinbaghdad29may03.shtml
Yes. That’s the way I understood it. The tall ones killed off the shorties is how I remember it.
“No one in the Western mainstream media has ever commented on the exceeding peculiarity of this bizarre turn of events, never witnessed before, in which the supposed victims of a genocide end up as the victors of the conflict.”
It’s very analogous to the WWII situation in which the nearly “wiped” out Jews have risen to the power in the West and the United States in particular.
Hi Denk,
It’s been the same in so many countries. I have a direct experience of Burkina Faso post Thomas Sankara meeting with many people. Sankara was one of the brightest man Africa has ever met. More than a marxiste, he was beforehand a sincere, hearted human being, living in accordance with his faith in God and in the possibility of an andogenic African development based on socialism. Man, the guy could raise the youth to build a railroad and all the testimonies I’ve heard were all positive in term of experience during the work. It was Africa, boys and girls met, people of all tribes. definitely not the goulag… lol
To my knowlege, there was no Jews behind him. In Burkina, most of the people have regreted the prospects of that era, some told me that at the time of the revolution, they hadn’t understood and bitterly regretted it.
This is his adress at Addis Abeba. Great orator, bright, funny, joyful. At the end of the second part, he asks his African counterparts to join Burkina in not paying the colonial debt otherwise, he just wouldn’t be there the next meeting. He died a couple of months later… unheard before
Video Linkhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9VZEkURD9oI
Peter Robinson [roman]: Where do you locate … We have to be very careful, I guess. I’ll put this in the … This is my thinking things through, as I’m making notes in the margins of your book. There’s always the danger that we moderns will look down on the ancients and consider ourselves morally superior. Is there a legitimate question to be asked along the following lines: that in the ancient world, that was the nature of warfare, not genocide, as we now understand it? If you wanted to defeat … There were three Punic Wars, after all, the Carthaginians wouldn’t let it go, and in the end it was the Romans who wouldn’t let it go.
Norman Naimark [jew]: Right, right, right, right.
Peter Robinson: You had to wipe people out in those days. Otherwise, you were just storing up trouble for your children and grandchildren. A generation later, they’d come back. Is there an argument for that, or not?
Norman Naimark: I think there is an argument for that. Again, all history is about argument, and I think that is-
Peter Robinson: And you love a good one.
Norman Naimark: And that is an argument that can be made,
Most of you here know what it means when 100 corpses lie next to each other, when there are 500 or when there are 1,000. To have endured this and at the same time to have remained a decent person — with exceptions due to human weaknesses — has made us tough, and is a glorious chapter that has not and will not be spoken of. Because we know how difficult it would be for us if we still had Jews as secret saboteurs, agitators and rabble-rousers in every city, what with the bombings, with the burden and with the hardships of the war. If the Jews were still part of the German nation, we would most likely arrive now at the state we were at in 1916 and 17…
I ask of you that that which I say to you in this circle be really only heard and not ever discussed. We were faced with the question: what about the women and children? – I decided to find a clear solution to this problem too. I did not consider myself justified to exterminate the men – in other words, to kill them or have them killed and allow the avengers of our sons and grandsons in the form of their children to grow up.
Mind control using electromagnetic waves has been one of the holy grails of the intelligence community for decades. Mind control experiments have been conducted on US citizens at least since WWII, and likely far longer. These are conducted in conjunction with various oral and injected medications and drugs. LSD is the most famous, but even Aliestar Crowley was experimenting on mind control during WWI using Psilocybin mushrooms provided by the US pharma industry on unsuspecting guests and other victims.
After the Macy conferences in San Francisco in the late 1940’s and the creation of the Esalen institute, Transhumanism kicked into high gear. This of course lead to Laurel Canyon Rock and Roll scene and the wide spread use of electron synthezided music in conjunction with mind control drugs.
The Grateful Dead was participating in the MIC mind control experiments, lead by Ken Keasey, called the electric koolaid acid tests. The LSD mind control guru for the Grateful Dead was Stanley Owsley, a scion of old Eastern wealth and the MIC. The story goes that the CIA bought out all the LSD produced my Sandoz and then taught Owsley how to produce it himself. Owsley also was given free access to the most powerfull electronic amplifiers in the US Navy, and he used this with the Grateful Dead to experiment with mind control and electronic music on party goers who had been unknowingly dosed with massive amounts of LSD through drinks like Kool Aid.
As these experiments progressed, Owsley used these powerful amplifiers to create the famous Grateful Dead “Wall of Sound” that required multiple Semi-trucks to haul around the US. Once this EM mind control had been perfected in the Bay Area, it was turned loose on the entire country starting with Woodstock, where massive quantities of LSD were used to spike the drinking water and koolaid passed around the audience. There were thousands of OD’s during the concert, and many scenes of complete debauchery. This is why Woodstock is still kept famous today.
This is all documented in McGowan’s “Wierd Scenes in the Canyon”.
It was about this time the Eselon and the Eugenacists embarked on their Transhumanistic goals. The personal computer was developed by the more intelligent acid heads as a further method of mind control, and after the hippy mind control experiments self destructed with the Manson family, a new venue for drugs and EM mind control was developed. At this time the Castro District in San Francisco became famous for its homosexual bath-house orgies, and we can be certain the CIA MKUltra mind control was involved in these and in the discovery of AIDS. This also coincided with the birth of “Burning Man”. The silicon valley Tech Industry, under the control of the Transhumanists like Eric Schmidt, Jack Dorsey and Zuckerberg, are an integral part of Burning man and the core constituents of this yearly EM music and mind control orgy are Silicon Valley tech employees themselves.
So these weapons have been perfected over the decades and have become an important part of the Color Revolution tool box. At the independence square in Kiev Victoria Nuland and John McCain were passing out chocolate cookies, spiked with who knows what, to the protesters. We can be certain that these protesters were also being energized by mind control EM emissions likely eminating from the US embassy, satellites, C-130’s and who knows what else.
Some variant of this technology is what was used in Crimson Mist, and they turned Rwanda into one massive Satanic blood sacrifice.
Today virtually everyone carries a cell phone that can certainly operate as an independent EM mind control transmitter. Combine this with 5G towers, multiple inoculations of nano-particle laced toxic brews that sneak past the blood-brain barrier, and we can see not only that the sheeple will be putting in the hands of the talmudic oligarchs, but also how screwed we all really are. Compared to the coming planetary useless eater genocide, the Rwanda genocide will be just a picnic.
I’m not so sure about the “Tutsi” and their reaction to genocide being presented as a solution to all the problems they caused.
“Niggers” are known for taunting their victims to provoke a violent reaction and use it to their own advantage.
Thanks for the update re: Dallaire.
The official narrative makes no sense, and is lacking in evidence. The story presented here makes sense, and has plenty of evidence, including documents and the testimonies of RPF defectors (some of whom then ended up assassinated).
I have been an independent freelance journalist for going on forty years now. I have never been ‘paid’ more than a couple of thousand dollars in all those years for any of my material. And most of those fees were paltry sums for a few articles in a few mainstream venues. The only independent site that I have received monies for is from Z Magazine for an article (‘Prescription for Scandal’) in 2001. In short, I am, and have never been, a ‘paid’ lackey of anyone, ever. That’s why I had a ‘day job’ (math teacher) all those years. If I had chosen – which I would never do, have never done – to be a corporate ‘journalist’, I could have been wealthy. Like most indy writers, we do it for the ’cause’, i.e. the cause of truth. You, on the other, sound suspiciously like a troll, i.e. miming the stance of the corporate / CIA hacks.
Antony C. Black
Brings to mind the CIA/ Belgian assassination of Patrice Lumumba in Zaire/ Congo.
No surprise that the psychopaths Bill and Hillary Clinton and Madeleine Albright were running things at the time. True Americans!
Phew … for a moment there I thought you were talking about the USA, the resemblance is so uncanny.
“Now they’re competing with the chinks, the enemy Clinton handed our jobs to”
-> Don’t blame only the Clinton admin, each and every big USA corporation is responsible for the heavy lifting to relocate jobs. Greedy and corrupted to the bone, the whole lot. It seems Chinese communists are just more socially responsible than USAns. Figures.
“I can tell you as a Tutsi ‘aficionado’” -> pretty big credentials right there.
“Hardly any wonder, then, that in 1996 US Ambassador to the UN, the ubiquitous Madeleine Albright, would veto his re-election making Boutros-Ghali the only UN Secretary General in history not to be granted a second term in office.”
Another reason that grotesque cow, Madeleine Albright, being a fake Christian must have hated the Coptic, Peter (Boutros) Peter (Boutros) Ghali being that she is a Jewess, albeit, in closet, unlike, equally grotesque but at least an openly Jew, Henry “war criminal” Kissinger.
in the section ‘Who Killed Habyarimana?’
‘… the exceeding peculiarity of this bizarre turn of events, never witnessed before, in which the supposed victims of a genocide end up as the victors of the conflict.’
Never ?
Thought ‘Hotel Propaganda’ title was referring 2 the ‘roach motel’ aspect of (((Israeli))) control over so-called (((We$tern))) government / (((Z.O.G.))) & (((Media))), but no = some krap about ‘rawanda’, which is probably all lies like everything else collected from ‘(((Lame$tream)))’ sources, + WTF should we care when monkeys off each other? That’s really ‘saving the planet’ 2 B tru! =) N E waze, know better than 2 start frum tha top on a (((Propaganda))) $ite, so skipped 2 the end & immediately noticed “adumbrated herein” = WTF? I’m 53 years old & never heard the word ‘adumbrated’ B 4 = another obvious ((($hill-Tard))) trying 2 pretend they R ‘the authority’ because they use big krappy words that nobody else likes. In art they call it ‘obscurantism’ = purposely over-complicating krap 2 PRETEND it is N E thing other than code 4: “(((K!LLW!TEY)))”!! =)) Like most things ‘political’ in the so-called (((We$t))), words like ‘adumbrated’ = code 4 ‘exturmenate w!te ppl & pi$$ on tha bonez, nagga!’ LOL A bunch of (probable) random tangents all adding up 2 ‘it’s never tha jooz’ = LOL!! Don’t even need 2 read it 2 know! =;-o ‘adumbrated herin’ = what a loon!
The Clintons were notoriously conniving cunts (how else do you get a billion dollars from foreigners?) thus, it’s isn’t surprising that the Jews who dominated the couple favored another bloodsucking minority, namely, the Tutsis, to takeover Rwanda and genocided the majority,
just as it had been done by the Bolsheviks in Russia (the learning curve goes back to the Book of Esther). And also, it were the Belgian and French Jews who had been exploiting Zaire (Mobutu Sese Seko, born Joseph Mobutu, was deeply connected to the Israeli military) but are now giving the Americans (read: Wall Street) primacy there.
But, what about Obama? Why didn’t he do anything to bring to light the events described herein? Once again, being surrounded by Jews (anyone forget his chief of staff Rahm “IDF” Emmanuel?) and wanting to think of the payoff (ownership of an NBA team) that was going to come or possibly being a mulatto identified with the tall and lighter skinned Tutsis as opposed to Michelle like Hutus, dark and darker. Of course, none of the house negros are going to speak up, including Kamala Harris, for fear of offending the financial powers (is it really the badass Rothschilds?) who can make or break them.
Until goyim are united against all the bloodsuckers, not a damn thing is going to change.
P. S. The “Human Rights Watch” is a Jewish financed homosexuality promoting outfit, whose sole interests are “is it good for the Tribe?” So, do not put trust in whatever they have to say.
But then, if say two governments disagree on a topic, let’s say the USA and the RF on “chemical attacks” in Syria, following your logic we shouldn’t believe either of them. Both may be lying at the same time on different details, but when states are opposed, usually ONE of them is telling the truth, even if just on that topic.
The problem isn’t governments, all governments lie at some point but we need one, the other option being feudal fragmentation (which is already happening in the USA and its weak government, with the feudal lords being the big corporations). I find lies told by governments with a national agenda to be less abominable than lies told by “universalist” governments who believe they know better than the rest of the world, and that includes most of NATO.
> 15% of the population dominating the other 85% is obviously a formula for instability and recurrent upheaval.
But that’s human nature amigo. Who are your masters now? The Jews rule you and me and they dominate everything. Not too different from the romans. Vast majority of the empire[ 99% ]weren’t from ancient Latium.
The pen name lemming fits.
So does yours, the last position in the alphabet being a nice metaphor for your IQ ranking
I remember when the events occured years ago, nothing I read or viewed in the news made much sense to me an I reserved my opinions for later. With more facts on the table 25 years later I am just starting to understand. Canada is just a vassal state of the Hegemon and maybe a part of it but with an hypocrite side; hiding behing a veil of pious principles.
You’re witty, dim but witty or is it half wit, I’ll let you know when I decide.
I spent some time reading about the Rwandan “Genocide”, watched the Hotel Rwanda film and looked around at various sources – Wikipedia etc. with Google searches and articles. The result was the official story of a murderous uprising of the Hutu underclass to eliminate the Tutsi minority leadership (using the obligatory word “genocide”). That only changed after reading this article. The hidden/deleted information completely reframes my understanding.
Interestingly, I went through the same process with 9/11, although I did finally break through the second layer of fakery (the curious layman layer involving searches and book buying) when I stumbled on an account of the collapse of Building 7 and wondered how it was possible that it was omitted from the official 9/11 enquiry.
These Neocon/CIA/deep state projects have a certain signature. They’re carefully prepared (often over years), well financed, often extremely violent, use a lot of technology, with the Jewish MSM always deeply involved in spinning the approved account -and fabricating a secondary line of defense (what I would call the curious layman layer).
It was the same with Iraq, Libya, 9/11, Ukraine (successes for them) and Turkey, Belarus, Syria and Venezuela (failures).
The anti-China project is following the same template, so the Chinese had better watch out. Their crime was to ignore US sanctions on Iran, become the major oil trade partner of the Saudis, exclude US finance and media from China and, worst of all, talk about fading the US dollar – basically all round challenging Jewish hegemony.
Then you don’t know anything about Rwanda at all. The Belgians created the fake story of an ethnic division between the two groups. They are ethnically homogeneous. The Belgians created an entire fake history of the Tutsi as descedents of a physically and culturally superior group that, if memory serves, originated in Egypt. Utter nonsese.
You want lies, look at the story of the Indispensible Country that saved the world from Nazi Germany’s plan to colonize Connecticut, their difficulties in subduing Poland and Yugoslavia notwithstanding.
Your impression of an ignorant moron regurgitating unsubstantiated propaganda while demanding substantation of a fully sourced article is hilarious. You pantomime reactionary cunt is an enormously entertining character, and I look forward to seeing more of your act. Bravo!
Have you considered lithium? Drastic, but it might help you.
Yes. That’s what the gibbering reactionaries are doing when they jabber about ‘the Bolsheviks killed umpteen million’ etc, where they refuse to acknowledge that every revolution to liberate humanity is met by savage violence from the parasites and the psychopathic butchers they hire to protect their power. And, as in China, in 1949, where despite CCP efforts to reduce the violence, peasants treated like dirt for centuries, took their revenge on the land-lord class and other blood-suckers, revolutions can get out of control as centuries of fury are set loose to roam the land. It’s a happy time for violent psychopaths.
Yes. The China operation is a monster-class in psychopathic lying (ie Uighur genocide)and MSM Evil. To see, yet again, some BBC piece of shit, declaring that China has bulldozed Uighur graves (why would they?)when the Chinese have shown that the bodies were moved from ‘traditional’ graves that were just mounds of sand, subject to erosion, animal desecration etc to concrete tombs, nearby, is to be affronted by the raw, stinky, hate-crazed Evil of these vermin. The entire Western MSM infection are quite possibly the worst cadre of human detritus ever assembled, vetted and policed by monsters like Murdoch and his underlings.
Have you seen the doco on the CIA/Belgian/South African/MI6 assassination of Dag Hammarskjold? ‘Cold Case Hammarskjold’ is excellent, and eye-opening, but not surprising to any student of Western EVIL.
said:
“Socialism doesn’t work because tender, sweet, loving capitalists kill them all.”
So that must be why “socialists” flee their sh-thole countries for capitalist ones.
But isn’t Oceania at war with Eastasia. Hasn’t Oceania always been at war with Eastasia? Sheese, so much disinfo these days.
You’ll note also how silent they have been about the nonstop violence in South Sudan ever since they connived at making it into a country.
The move to China started 15 years before Clinton became president. People like Richard Blum and other Californians like the Haas Russells were making plans even before the opening to China. It was all over by the time Clinton was elected.
I read General Daillaire ‘s book . Don’t remember much about it.
“[…]never witnessed before[…]”
Er. Really? Not even the holocaust narrative? The “victims of genocide”, in this case, have more power (by orders of magnitude) than any African tribe. They control global finance and media in a world dominated by finance and media.
It always was weird even learning about it as a kid how fast the RPF advanced after the plane was shoot. There clearly had to be some pre planning for such a successful offensive but that topic is never explored in the west at all.
https://www.counterpunch.org/2017/12/22/into-africa-who-killed-hammarskjold/
Excellent work, Mr. Black.
Thanks to UR for publishing this account.
Dr Mahathir…
https://www.news.com.au/world/malaysia-airlines-mh370-mystery-is-in-the-hands-of-the-cia-says-former-pm-dr-mahathir-mohamad/news-story/c3d24c3dc77844ea11a492efbdeae585
Kudos to little Z magazine for paying you.
I always thought there was something totally obscure about the Rwanda genocide.
The reasons for it were portrayed in the MSM as basically irrational—“timeless ethnic tensions.” People just cut each other down with machetes etc. for no good reason.
This trope has been used over and over again where tensions have actually been stoked and stoked and stoked and there are good reasons why ethnic groups—many of whom have coexisted fairly well–over and over again have been apparently set at each other’s throats.
When will the world learn to distrust this narrative and to look for the usual suspects with “ethnic conflict” breaks out in resource-rich third world countries—namely, the USA and other imperialists looking for resources to control?
Thanks to Black for showing how Rwanda has been not only sacrificed for Western interests but then, to add insult to injury, used as a poster child for this narrative .
Makes one wonder what has been going on in Ethiopia and Tigray: how things got to the current state of affairs.
Yes, events really did not make any sense at the time.
THis was also my main takeaway. So ever since then I have kind of ignored reference to the Rwanda genocide. It always had a made-up quality about it. No way to understand it, so why bother?
Now we see the finger prints of Clinton-Albright. In the intervening years we have come to realize what awful people the Clintons and their entourage were and are.
Nothing is beyond this bunch.
As for Obama, he is owned lock, stock, and barrel by Jewish (ex-Mobsters) interests in Chicago: the Pritzker Family. Read Gus Russo’s SuperMob for a good account of how they got rich by screwing Japanese Americans during and after WW2.
Their formula: Own the law; own the judges.
Such as David Bazalon.
This narrative should scare the becheeses out of every White American. The running battles, and the just plain running, could easily happen here. This was pure hatred, and we’ve more than enough of it in the US&A.// Picture yourself, outgunned, running into a forest with your enemy in hot pursuit.
Whole ee shot.
It is impossible to claim of Karl Marx without having promised the power you are about to conquer to the Cabal for whom Marx worked. Make no mistake about it : if you don’t make world Judaeo-Satanism (you may be against Israel, though, as the Judaeo-Satanism considers the whole Earth to be its promise land, not the mere strip of land between the Mediterreanean and the Red Sea) the top priority of your political action you are not legally entitled in any country and by any system of law to use the registered Trade Mark started in the name of Marx, you will be pursued on a part with illegal practitioners of Freudian psychoanalysis or teachers of the theory of Relativity. You won’t be even killed, you will just be pursued for misappropriation of your label and have no chance to publish a single book or pamphlet without being accused of false representation : you must be part of the syndicate and obey its conditions and among its conditions is the deliberate spreading of misery and powerlessness among the people. What Karl Marx built was a system of ritual black magic, not of social action, it is mathematically impossible to use his logo or anyone derived from it without either adhering in all good ritual form to world-control judaism (as opposed to Zionism which just keeps contents with the lesser Israel the devil or chaos take the rest of the world) or accomplishing like human sacrifices (Karl Marx sacrificed his own children to achieve his prophetic stature).
You cannot be even a failed or killed or beautifully losing Marxist leader without having first sold you soul to the occult entity underlaying the whole Marxist phenomenon, and without having engaged in heavy-duty spiritism and table-turning, as Marx himself did. Beware of all Marxists having the repute of tragically dead idealists, like Che Guevara, like Trotsky, like Salvador Allende, like Sankara : they are even worse than the Stalinist bureaucrats, as they have been busy working over their occult aura in the phenomenal world to figure as saints : as we know at last, Che Guevara was little more than a butcher and a serial killer for erotic hell of it, Trotsky a methodic spreader of mental and political chaos, Salvador Allende was member of an all-American Masonic order that probably disappeared into secrecy alleging suicide and leaving behind another body, and Sankara was a sorcerer by formation before engaging into Marxism. Marxism demands as a top priority the merciless combat of all forms of idealism, political or otherwise. And beware of such heroes in countries too far by distance or by culture for you to check, like Chile or Burkina Faso.
Last but not least, there is no such thing as political idealism in Africa, that’s something that the African races have been shown to be hardwired configured against. Marxism is a label of guarantee that the political idealists you will meet with are either fake either absolutely devoid of power in their machine and about to be disposed the very day these useful idiots have past their date of usefulness.
https://www.indiatoday.in/world/story/missing-malaysian-plane-why-is-australia-silent-on-secret-radar-data-185404-2014-03-19
Not anymore though. The trend is reversing. Except I’m not sure China is going to accept as many immigrants. Today we learned that Joe Biden is considering classifying anyone with dissident thoughts as DVE (domestic violent extremist). Dark humor is always fun.
You can stay in your banana republic, but the dream of the middle class is gone for good unless the west starts re-industrializing and giving jobs to local people, controlling and developing its infrastructure, taking care of its population with the taxes it’s already collecting and stop having an economy based on finance, insurance, real estate and war.
You know, like what the commies are doing.
Lay off the sauce.
Good point!
The Canadian military/intelligence complex is complicit in that one too. The CIA loves them some Canadian officers because of their capacity to speak French with the coup leaders when it’s time to overthrow a sovereign government in the former French and Belgian regions of Africa. And Haiti. Which in itself is hilarious because the Canadians can no better speak Haitian “French” than they can Swahili.
Canadians recently trained a junta in Mali, and they were involved way back in the ouster of Nkrumah in Ghana.
https://ottawacitizen.com/news/national/defence-watch/canadian-special-forces-to-continue-with-u-s-led-training-of-african-troops-despite-links-to-coups
https://yvesengler.com/2020/10/14/canadian-military-training-in-africa-is-extension-of-us-imperialism/
The Tutsi were suposed to be the tall ones, and they were, in the Imperial US fairy tale, shortened by the wicked Hutu. In reality the difference in stature was a figment of an old Belgian colonial trick.
Ahh, Gomez-that is precisely what our lachrymose, Sabbat Goy, PM, Hawke stated in our Parliament. Between sniffles and blubbering, he described how the Evil ChiComms ran over poor students IN Tian Men Square, going back and forth until they were a slimy residue, then they were all bull-dozed into a pile and set alight!! I KID YOU NOT!!!!!!! To the day of his death he never withdrew that deranged lie. And that was when this country still had some non-lunatics in public life.
UPDATE for this 2014 piece: Paul Rusesabagina has fallen into the hands of Kagame. He is now on trial, and under torture, in Kigali – – https://www.nytimes.com/2021/06/05/world/africa/hotel-rwanda-denied-food-medicine.html
Hi Miro23,
I tried to find an English interview of Charles Onana. Unfortunately, to my knowledge, the only interview he gave in English was done by the BBC. Jacques Matand Diyambi, the journalist who made the interview was fired after the job under pressure from the Kagamé regime. A web site had posted the interview https://www.mbokamosika.com/2020/02/l-interview-de-charles-onana-a-la-bbc.html
But as you can check, it has been removed from youtube.
As we’ve learned, Kagamé has powerfull backers. Powerfull enough to bent the arm of subservient France. Onana must be protected.
I’m with you on the cause of Africa’s problems. But the cure you offer… ? Hmmm…
As I once read in a novel about another human disaster…
“I’m beginning to think you’re a touch anti-social, my son”.
If that’s true, why did HRW recently put out a report calling Israel an apartheid state? I’m not trolling you; I’m curious.
Correct. And guess (((who runs it))) ?
I have an idea you’ve kind of missed the point, friend.
Personally speaking, after 7,100 extremely professional, well-written, convincingly-explained, coherent and impartial lines of alternative history for a deliberately-engineered genocide, I wasn’t really thinking so much about White devils – but only about the (((real Devils))) behind the scenes of every single American foreign-policy screw-up and blood-soaked human disaster you’d care to name.
You do know who we’re all talking about… Right… ?
Thanks for the reference to Charles Onana’s interview. I am warching it right now and I ordered one of his books. Fascinating. He says the equivalent of the Denmark population has been killed in Congo. tThe humanitarians didn’t even blink! Right in the middle of the Internet age! What a failure.
Thanks for that interview with Charles Onana
https://www.mbokamosika.com/2020/02/l-interview-de-charles-onana-a-la-bbc.html
It’s a pity that it’s in French (I’m OK with it, but most English speakers are excluded). It couldn’t be clearer that the whole Rwanda/Congo story is as scripted as Syria or the Ukraine. The ZioGlob/CIA wanted control of the rich mineral resources of eastern Congo and set up the Rwandan Patriotic Army to overthrow the legitimate majority government of Rwanda (and later of the Congo).
Their man was Paul Kagame who gave them cover to loot the place – along the lines that he was fighting the Hutu “genocide” and entered eastern Congo de deal with the Hutu “genocidaires” . Supposedly he was searching for them to settle the “debilitating armed conflict” when in fact his troops were busy taking control of the rich mining operations.
Onana makes it plain that the US, the EU and the UN do not allow any deviance from the script. One hour fifteen minutes of interview but worth it from a well informed journalist and writer who was there.
And this slaughter has been done mainly but surely not solely for coltan, which is behind every cell phones, Screens which are raping our souls, degrading our IQ and feeding the beast of big data…
Anyway…
Take care
“Milosevic and Gaddafi are not the only victims of this criminalised international legal structure. The list is long. The judicial murder of Saddam Hussein by the Americans and British and their Iraqi collaborators was also based on a clearly political sham indictment and though portrayed as an Iraqi affair was another show trial arranged by the imperial power. In fact American officers were in charge of the entire proceedings. Other national leaders who have become helpless victims of these tribunals include President Charles Taylor of Liberia, convicted despite a lack evidence of any criminal wrongdoing by the ad hoc Sierra Leone tribunal, Prime Minister Jean Kambanda of Rwanda, sentenced to life without a trial he vehemently demanded to have by the ad hoc Rwanda tribunal and most recently President Laurent Gbagbo of Ivory Coast, politically assassinated by his arrest, by French forces and his detention for 3 years at the ICC without any prima facie case being made out against him even up to today. Indictments have been issued against other national leaders who are in the way of the west, such as the President Bashir of Sudan and President Uhuru Kenyatta of Kenya, whose case is now suspended, since the ICC now admits that they have no evidence against him. Just recently there was talk in the western press of charges against President Putin. We all see how absurd and surreal the game has become.”
https://wikispooks.com/wiki/Christopher_Black#cite_note-5
I’m very sociable, it’s that the populations we’re talking about are sociopathic and generally inferior.
TAM color rev failed.
No worry, CIA/MI6 framed it as ‘massacre of unarmed students’.
Gregory Clark exposed the fraud decades ago,[1] followed by numerous others.
Fat lot of good it does.
Its no match for CIA’s mighty wurlitzer.[2]
sobs ‘commermorated TAM masscare’ every 4/6.
This year they timed it in junction with the UIghurs and covid inquisition.
A triple whammy to nail the chicoms.
tHEY aint called the five liars for nuthin you know !
[1]
https://www.japantimes.co.jp/opinion/2011/07/01/commentary/black-info-and-media-gullibility-creation-of-the-tiananmen-myth/
This was an update of Clarks much earlier expose’ decades ago.
[2]
http://www.converge.org.nz/abc/prsp25.htm
————————
PS
These HIQ idiots dont even realise they’r the most played puppets on earth…
https://forums.theregister.com/forum/all/2021/06/04/search_engine_tiananmen/
Crying for a people being told lies
heheheheheh
https://www.globalresearch.ca/u-s-u-k-allies-grab-congo-riches-and-millions-die/10815
They dont call the five liars the teflon club for nuthin you know….nuthin sticks.
In their wonderful ‘rule based’ system,
you need only remember two rules…
From that same page, the Zio/CIA are targeting the author.
https://wikispooks.com/wiki/Christopher_Black#cite_note-5
There’s this account of the CIA giving him a message:
When the US gets its own Civil War II, the first place they need to visit is Langley, Virginia – and start asking them some serious questions.
I guess that it got so hot for Israel defenders after its asymmetrically egregious behavior during the Gaza offensive that all of them had to take cover, including HRW. It’s better to be safe than sorry by not alienating a class of donors who are genuinely of right mind when it comes to the unsolvable issue related to the two of the most intransigent peoples on earth.
This sentence is a lie.
You are incapable of the truth. Take your 2 comments and 300 words and pedal off to Israel for all I care. The contempt I have for CIA, your wars and the rest of your apparatus is apparent the past three or four years and 300,000 words and however many comments here. You’d know that if you were as thoughtful as you say, before you write. Teachers teach because they cannot do. Indie writer, eh? Me too. Big deal. Bet you waited for your pension before you ever opened your trap.
One thing left out of Black’s version, is that Dallaire disobeyed orders to retreat, and was in psychotherapy for PTSD after his return. If he was as complicit as alleged, that would be an odd outcome.
FUKUS sponsored kangaroo court back in action.
ICTY on the case of ‘UIghurs genocide’.
What can possibly go wrong ?
https://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2021/06/16/geoffrey-nices-road-show-vindicates-our-prognosis/
No sooner than BIden ordering intel to find the source of SARS2,[sic] when somebody already managed to FOIA tons of emails supposedly incriminating WIV.
Is it possible to FOIA the Hammarskjöld flight voice communication transcript, or the
Pine Gap record on MH370, or gawd forbid……the dark secrets of 911 ?
So you’r member of the HIQ idiots brigade ?
https://community.oilprice.com/topic/13603-pew-poll-90-of-us-believes-china-is-threat/
My father found out that the ‘massacre’ IN the Square was a LIE, within hours, using a telephone. He rang friends in various news agencies, and eventually contacted Western film-crews who had been in the Square all night, as it was peacefully cleared by the cops. Western diplomats were there, and Wikileaks US Embassy cables said the same thing. NO MASSACRE in the Square, yet the Big Lie lives on. Now joined by the ‘Uighur genocide’ Big Lie, and the WIV Big Lie, and countless others.
A good start would be to arrest everyone in any way involved with 9/11 (inc. politicians, military, CIA, FBI, contractors, media) and give them the quick choice of 1) a full confession naming all names or 2) a short trial for treason with a directly applied death penalty if found guilty.
It’s the only formula that would match the depth of the criminality, and they would talk.
My brother was there on a safari and said yes there were indeed short ones and tall ones. He said the short ones were friendly but the tall ones not so much. I tend to believe him; liar that he was he had no reason to fib about that.
Thanks for… err… sharing your general and specific ignorance.
It is certain these overly simplified caracterisations are ridiculous propaganda. There exist a difference between what “scientists” call Hamito-shamitic African and negroïd ones. My ex-wife is Peulh, people of the “sacred cow”, traditional herdsmen, related to the Tutsis and others so I have some knowledge of the affair (lol). From what the Rwandans I have met and talked with said, this was not so much of a problem in Rwanda and there were also many, many people of mixed origins in the society . The main factor is not racial but political.
He said, She said… it’s all very confusing and convoluted. Clandestine operations occur in every nation. The more powerful the nation/country, the more elaborate and more numerous the clandestine operations. France, Spain, Great Britain, Ireland, Italy, Russia, Australia, Germany, Sweden, Denmark, Columbia, Mexico, Africa and of course Israel….all guilty of decades of subterfuge, propaganda, plotting, scheming and killing to undermine and defeat perceived or real enemies. The more brutal the false flag, the more innocents are slaughtered, the more determined and persistent the cover-up. This is the nature of the world.
After all, our supposed “civilized” nations are ran by hairless apes…who themselves are not to far removed from their distant cousins; flesh eating, waring tribes of chimpanzees fighting over territory, food and stinky females in estrus. What can one really espect from homo-sapiens?
It took Russia 70 years to admit to the Katyn Forrest Massacres and only because the evidence was overwhelming and undeniable. https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/soviets-admit-to-katyn-massacre
The US and Great Britain will never admit to the indiscriminate Nightly firebombings of German Civilians and Japanese civilians in WWII- INTENTIONALLY murdering MILLIONS of women and children. The US Government will never admit to the intentional murder of millions of German POWs placed into open air concentrations camps and starved to death. Or the sale of 500,000 German POWs to Russia to be used in slave labor camps.
https://ww2truth.com/2017/10/03/the-deliberate-fire-bombing-of-german-cities/
Our US Government will never admit that they intentionally left behind over a 1000 Americans soldiers in Viet Cong POW Camps. The coverup has lasted since 1975 (47 years ago).
Every country has a closet full of embarassing attrocities best not revielled in today’s fragile climate of hyper senstitive, micro-agression, me-too, thumb sucking, pink-pussy hat wearing, safe space needing, transgender society, black wokeness, climate hoax society. The trauma would be unbearable. Like a bunch of pot smoking flower childs learning of the My Lai Massacre. Oh the Horror.
Known collaborations, joint culpability of hidden crimes and attrocities are the CURRENCY of the elite. I often wondered why Hilary Clinton never saw prison time or Barrack Obama never saw prision time. Or all of the proven corrupt DOJ, FBI and CIA directors, caught read handed in treasonist acts, never faced prosecution. Then it dawned on me. They all know the truth behind 9/11. Many political elites war warned not to fly commercial airlines in the weeks leading up to 9/11.
It is mutual Détente; mutual blackmail – assured mutual destruction. As an elite, your place at the table is ensured only if you are corruptable, dirty, debauched, filthy or a psychopathic pedophile wierdo (Joe Biden). The worse the better. You will shut your mouth and tow the line. The Clinton Crime Family, the Joe Biden Crime Family, the Bush Crime Family, the illegal alien Obama Presidency…all fit the bill.
——————————————————————————————
“Ultimately, however, the capture of the Congo was about booty. As such, this single treasure chest contains not only large deposits of diamonds, gold, copper, uranium and tantalum (used in computers and cell phones), but also much of the world’s reserves of chrome, platinum and cobalt.”
It would be good to do a follow up article on this claim. What companies are now extracting this booty??? How soon after the regime change did these companies set up operations. Who owns these companies??? Who in American Politics at the time of this Genocide owned stocks in these companies. When were those stocks purchased? Are the small hats involved???
Do you have any proof of what you assert?
If so, let’s have it.
If, however, you have to rely on the MSM or the brayings of tribal chiefs, you can be sure of endless exaggeration and outright lies.
Thank you mr Black!
It’s an outstanding article!
You have really clarified this traumatic mess.
I happened to buy, after listening I think, to someone at Kevin Barrett, a book written by Judi Rever, ”In praise of Blood”, on the subject.
I was surprised she wasn’t mentioned in your article, as it was said, in said podcast, it was the best book sofar, on the subject.
Would you care to comment on that?
(I have only perused it selectively, after reading your article.)
Someone paid Black? I don’t know what Black got for his deluded scribblings but if you ask me, he should have gotten life.
But Clinton did NAFTA. That was the death-blow.
Go ahead, take your meds retard. Maybe you won’t notice how fucked your children are, if you have any.
Judi Rever is, essentially, an opportunist pedaling a ‘soft’ version of the truth, i.e. the truth being that it was the US / Belgian / Canadian-backed RPF that did all of the *systematic* killings (for, of course, once the coup occurred and the RPF invasion began all hell broke loose and panic ensued…and which involved many civilian on civilian killings). Rever has consistently ignored all the evidence – the overwhelming weight of the evidence – that shows that it was the RPF, not the Rwandan Gov’t, that engaged in a *planned and systematic* killing of Hutus by the RPF. Remember, this was a coup d’etat, and an invasion by the RPF that had already begun by the time the President’s plane was shot down. It was the US-backed RPF under Kagame that was responsible for the vast majority of the deaths. Rever has simply chosen to ignore both the evidence – and the logic – that attests to the ‘one source’ *systematic* killing narrative in favour of the more palatable (to the Western audience) view that both sides engaged in systematic killings. She is big on attacking Kagame (which he so richly deserves), but, as I say, she resolutely ignores the likes of the Gersony Report attesting to the planned, systematic genocide by Kagame & Co’s RPF.
Thank you Mr Black!
That corroborates my impression, of a cursory reading of her text/book.
As a layman, and ”hin enkelte”, Kierkegaard idea, and work for a living, it’s almost impossible to keep up with ”infonami”.
Therefore as said, I appreciate greately your essay.
The trauma these ”things” put on us is immense.