The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 James Kirkpatrick Archive
Grass-Roots Americans Revolt Against Critical Race Theory
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

Suddenly, ordinary Americans are rising to resist anti-white Cultural Marxist Critical Race Theory indoctrination in their schools. An authentic grassroots movement at the state and local level is forcing state legislatures and school boards to act against this poisonous Communist doctrine. Naturally, the Regime Media is speaking power to truth, trying to “explain” things to the peasants who don’t want their children harmed. But that this is even judged necessary is a very good sign.

Of course, if we were to take Journofa and academics at their word, Critical Race Theory would make Civic Nationalism completely impossible. If CRT really becomes the orthodox teaching of the American Global Empire, the Historic American Nation would need to break away in order to survive.

The scope of the anti-CRT movement should not be underestimated. Idaho has successfully banned Critical Race Theory from being taught in schools [Idaho governor signs bill to ban critical race theory from being taught in schools, by Mike Jordan, The Guardian, May 6, 2021]. Oklahoma has passed a similar law [Gov. Stitt signs bill that restricts teaching of critical race theory in Oklahoma Schools, by Hicham Raache, News4Oklahoma, May 7, 2021]. In Tennessee, Governor Bill Lee is expected to sign a similar bill passed by the legislature banning CRT [Race shouldn’t be taught in ‘divisive’ way, Tennessee governor says, by Jonathan Mattise and Kimberlee Kruesi, Chattanooga Times Free Press, May 8, 2021]. Florida Governor Ron DeSantis, who increasingly looks like a presidential contender, has condemned CRT [DeSantis condemns critical race theory, says it won’t be taught in Florida classrooms, by Brooke Singman, Fox News, March 18, 2021]. Finally, there is an effort to ban CRT in Texas, where it just passed the House [Texas House advances bill targeting ‘critical race theory’ over objections from education, civics, and business groups, by Talia Richman, The Dallas Morning News, May 11, 2021].

There are also important battles being waged at the local level. Near Dallas, a group of parents won a victory over pro-CRT candidates for the school board in a local election that became national news [Voters in Dallas Suburb Lead Revolt Against Critical Race Theory Curriculum, by Jarrett Stepman, The Daily Signal, May 6, 2021]. In Loudon County in Northern Virginia, parents organized against CRT and were so effective that a teacher openly denounced them as, guess what, racists [Teacher accuses parent group of ‘racism,’ after group Loudon Times-Mirror, by John Battison, Loudon Times-Mirror, April 16, 2021]. There is now a PAC for parents to fight back against those who want to impose CRT on students [Virginia parents group starts PAC to unseat school board members over racial and reopening controversies, by Kaelan Deese, Washington Examiner, April 13, 2021].

However, we should be clear about what this is about. This isn’t about white identity, unless we want to say this is some implicit, subconscious form of it. Instead, it’s people who really believe in colorblindness pushing back against an effort to make everything about race.

National Review, for example, concedes that “obviously” the “legacy of racism” should be taught in American schools, but argues that CRT specifically is bad [A Welcome Backlash against Critical Race Theory, by The Editors , May 10, 2021]. The Federalist’s Gabe Kaminsky argues (accurately) that CRT is “atomizing” and would “divide” the American people [Biden’s Support Of Critical Race Theory Tells You All You Need To Know About His Version Of ‘Unity,’ May 3, 2021]. Christopher Rufo calls CRT—aargh!—“neoracism” (and has VDARE.com blocked on Twitter for some (triangulating?) reason. But we don’t deny that he’s getting results, each battle carefully tracked on his Twitter feed).

In response, the Regime Media has unleashed a flurry of condescending articles explaining what Critical Race Theory “really” is. A lot of this is the usual motte-and-bailey strategy: Critical Race Theory, we are told, is merely about examining the impact of racism in American institutions. With many Americans, including Conservativism Inc. denizens, conceding the point that pre-1965 (or these days, pre-2014) America was irredeemably immoral, framing the issue in this way is effective for the Left. Why must students be prevented from learning this version of history, they could ask?

Thus the Regime Media insinuates that conservatives are just having a silly moral panic again. Notice these sneering headlines:

Of course, President Trump also gets the blame [How Trump ignited the fight over critical race theory in schools, by Char Adams, NBC News, May 10, 2021].

Yet it’s precisely those who understand Critical Race Theory (probably because they were forced to sit through it in college) who know why it is poisonous. If anyone doesn’t understand it, it’s the naïve, patriotic conservative white Boomers who are vulnerable to it because they are still operating under the assumption that Martin Luther King’s lie about “colorblindness” was ever a goal of the so-called Civil Rights Movement.

Those pushing CRT know precisely what they are doing. Critical Race Theory requires you to accept, as a cornerstone premise, that America is inherently racist and that racial disparities exist because of that racism. You can’t opt out of this by saying that you personally are not racist. Comparing racism to cancer, Ibram Kendi intones: “There’s just no way we’re going to survive racism as a society and even as individuals without pain” [How to Be an Antiracist: A Conversation With Ibram X. Kendi, by Zenobia Jeffries Warfield, Yes!, October 25, 2019]. Making things worse for whites is part of the program.

Of course, there are several problems with this right off the bat:

  • First, Critical Race Theory is unfalsifiable, meaning that there is no possible evidence that could disprove it.

It’s a dogma. To claim otherwise is taken as proof that you’re a bigot, just as the theory predicts. It thus negates any evidence which shows that biology, culture, progressive government policies, or anything other than white racism explains continuing and seemingly perpetual racial disparities.

  • Second, there’s no conceivable end to the CRT program.
ORDER IT NOW

There is no point where the specter of “whiteness” can be fully excised and an “equitable” society realized. It’s an eternal struggle and one that is artificially created. If we are to take Kendi’s disease metaphor, CRT is the intellectual equivalent of taking a healthy person and subjecting him to painful radiation therapy until he dies, all while telling him it’s for his own good.

  • Third, we aren’t allowed to mention what groups are imposing this dogma.

The whole theory rests on the assumption that America is institutionally racist and designed for whites and that blacks can’t be racist because they lack institutional power. Yet it’s hard to imagine a more coddled, subsidized, and corporate-sponsored “public intellectual” than Ibram Kendi and his countless equivalents. This is being pushed by elites with money and media power from the top down.

For example, even when a local school board in Texas defeated critical race theory, we are told it came over the objections of “education, civics and business groups” [Texas House advances bill targeting ‘critical race theory’ over objections from education, civics, and business groups, by Talia Richman, The Dallas Morning News, May 11, 2021]. Parents are the underdogs in these battles.

  • Fourth, and most importantly, CRT is entirely self-serving.

As with the Refugee Resettlement Racket, many of those who preach it as a moral imperative in fact benefit financially from it. Indeed, Newsweek reports that a company which sent out a “survey” promoting an anti-racist curriculum to parents also had signed a contract with Fairfax County, VA public schools to train school staff in anti-racism [Virginia Bureaucrats Map Out ‘Anti-Racist’ Reeducation Plan, by Asra Nomani and Elizabeth Schultz, May 11, 2021]. Potentially millions of dollars are at stake. Why would anyone trained in CRT say their job is done?

More to the point, what value can someone schooled in Critical Race Theory possibly provide? Such a person is trained to invent grievances and appeal to the state and media for redress. Every student that would graduate from schools with CRT curriculum would be a massive potential liability.

It’s not just a waste of money. It’s actually spending money to make students dumber and institutions more committed to failure—the educational equivalent of having the U.S. Air Force bomb its own bases.

The Trump Administration’s so-called 1776 Commission may have been “typical Conservatism Inc. tripe.” But it at least was an attempt to create a unifying national history instead of perpetual racial conflict. CRT not only divides, but it is designed to divide and render that division perpetual. It won’t solve “racism” but simply ensure racial complaints become more ludicrous, extreme—and unchallengeable.

If CRT isn’t defeated at the national level, and the GOP doesn’t do more to support the grassroots activists, every white person in the country will have to choose between three options:

  • First, shut up, pay up, and suffer by design.
  • Second, pretend to be non-white, like Rachel Dolezal, and hope no one notices.
  • Finally, break free of a system that is institutionally racist and oppressive–against whites.

I hope it won’t come to this choice. If it does, let’s pray European-Americans have a shred of the integrity possessed by their Revolutionary forebears and choose freedom over submission.

(Republished from VDare by permission of author or representative)
 
Hide 19 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. They can oppose it all they want. If they don’t go to the source and name the Jewish Power behind it, it will do no good.

    • Replies: @Chris Moore
    , @Anon
    , @Richard B
  2. Chris Moore says: • Website
    @Priss Factor

    I recall what you wrote on another thread noting the imperial incentives for CRT:

    And in perverse way, anti-white ideology serves US neo-imperialism well. If US power around the world were solidly pro-white, it would create the impression that it is the force of white-western-domination. But by promoting anti-whiteness(such as BLM), US power creates the illusion that it is for ‘justice’ and ‘equality’ and against ‘racism’. So, when US foreign/cultural policy leads with stuff like BLM, there is less resistance to US power from non-white nations, especially those where people still assume American Power remains white. Of course, American Power is now essentially Jewish Supremacist, and whites are mostly cuck-cattle of the Jews.

    https://www.unz.com/ghood/coordination-and-decomposition/#comment-4582791

    But average Jews are starting to understand that CRT is coming for them, too. Take a look at this search “critical race theory jewish”:
    https://duckduckgo.com/?q=critical+race+theory+jewish&atb=v190-1&ia=web

    So the Jews who are really behind it are the imperial Jews — the neocon/neolib power brokers, propagandists, money-men, and their hangers-on. This isn’t to say average Jews won’t get back on board if the neocon/neolibs could turn it exclusively against Whites again, because like a lot of psychotically greedy Whites who see themselves as some kind of royal “Chosen-Elect,” Jews are all about lining their own pockets, living high on the hog, and projecting an image of royal entitlement.

    But because a Jewish core is feeling threatened by CRT, lower-rung Jews are increasingly against it.

    There’s a lesson there. The White “Chosen-Elect” core must be made to feel the heat of CRT. Their feet must be held to the fire until their squirming, greedy, psychotic brains finally understand it’s not just average and working class Whites who will get burned, but they themselves will burn.

    Christianity used to work to force these reptilian White “elites” to toe the line, but that’s less and less relevant because it has been transformed into Zionism by the Jews.

  3. Thomasina says:

    “It’s not just a waste of money. It’s actually spending money to make students dumber and institutions more committed to failure—the educational equivalent of having the U.S. Air Force bomb its own bases.”

    Follow the money. A whole new industry invented, new textbooks (follow the money) to be written, new associations to be created, along with the CEO’s who head them.

    Same with Covid – a license to print money for hospitals, for pharmaceutical companies getting filthy rich off the pseudo-vaccines, for ventilator manufacturers, for monopoly companies like Amazon who became the only game in town when everything else was shut down, etc. Same with the “refugee resettlement” racket. Same with global warming.

    The elites don’t believe any of this sh*t. They manufacture these things out of whole cloth. They don’t wait around until crises occur; they invent and engineer crises and then cash in.

    They rig elections and manipulate and steer the stock and bond markets.

    “Elites” is too kind a word for them. “Shysters” would be more accurate.

  4. Phibbs says:

    Jews brought down Christian Caucasian Russia in 1917 and they are doing the same thing to Christian white America. The same spirit that hated Jesus hates us Goyim is still alive in Jews today. Either we patriots deport them or suffer the consequences.

  5. Anon[407] • Disclaimer says:
    @Priss Factor

    Let’s name that Jewish power. “Salvation is from the Jews,” blasphemed Rabbi Jesus. His followers are Jews. “Christ our Passover lamb is sacrificed for us.” Who else celebrates the bloody Jewish child sacrifice ritual but Jews? These Rabbi-worshiping Jews are Internationalist-Globalists. “Go ye unto all nations.” Fanatical Jewsus-freaks mean to save all the Negroes and baby Niglets for Jebus, while proclaiming the lie there is no difference in different nationalities. “There is neither Jew nor Greek,” but like George Orwell’s Animal Farm, some Jews are more equal than others, thus Romans 15:27 slyly inserts that “Goyim (Gentiles) owe it $$$ to the Jews” living in Zion. To be sure, the Jewish author in the Jew Testament book of Philippians states, “We are the Circumcision.” Who but Jews identify by the degenerate genital butchering ritual? No wonder the Vicar of Christ said, “Inside every Christian is a Jew.”

    I name the Jew. It’s you.

    P.S. You were born right the first time, it’s ok to be white.

  6. With many Americans, including Conservativism Inc. denizens, conceding the point that pre-1965 (or these days, pre-2014) America was irredeemably immoral, framing the issue in this way is effective for the Left.

    Yet it’s precisely those who understand Critical Race Theory (probably because they were forced to sit through it in college) who know why it is poisonous. If anyone doesn’t understand it, it’s the naïve, patriotic conservative white Boomers who are vulnerable to it

    Don’t take this as critical, but the underlying assumption seems to ignore ‘how we got here’. Basically, almost any popular, heavily promoted narrative that is heavily underwritten and deliberately disseminated is designed to sell and market, while the truth, unsuited to such purposes, is suppressed or punished. This principle seldom changes or deviates.

    The Boomers are not actually ‘vulnerable’ to propaganda anymore than any other population segment, they are simply a fulfillment of the Stanford Prison experiment as applied to human nature.

    “Over the course of the experiment, some of the guards became cruel and tyrannical, while a number of the prisoners became depressed and disoriented.”

    Anytime a selected population group is employed to act as a ‘breaker’, to gain or assert control against other groups, you offer them privileges and indoctrinate them with the belief that this is ‘earned’ in the case of their own group, while other segments within society deserve punishment, or have not earned the right to select treatment.

    The Boomers were the ‘breaking’ population that had already emerged into retirement at the onset of the offshoring trade scams, and ensuing in-sourcing labor importation swarming. For decades, the Boomers rewarded this conduct under the indoctrinated premise that they were uniquely entitled within society, while other population segments had a duty to supply them with low priced goods and S.S. / SSI checks.

    While far from the entire population segment accepted this role, those who did were extremely useful politically, because you can go back to that same ‘well’ time and time again, since the masses agreeable to anti-logic are remarkably consistent in this trait.

    • Replies: @Chris Moore
  7. The Trump Administration’s so-called 1776 Commission may have been “typical Conservatism Inc. tripe.” But it at least was an attempt to create a unifying national history instead of perpetual racial conflict.

    Founding myths can be useful (the suckling romulus and remus) when the intended purpose is to provide some common descent mythos, however when the myth is proposed by those who have no direct heritage and are quite aware of this, it is generally actually intended to justify unpopular or tyrannical rule, and reframe it as something benevolent.

    1619 / 1776 both ignore the reality of a population that never actually got along, or was at all suitable for mandated homogenization, but was overcome by force gradually, and under a pretense that has tirelessly worked to over-write the truth.

    As pertains the 1619 faction, the vast majority of colonial white Americans never owned or imported slaves, and the commercial importation was largely conducted by Yankee ships out of New England seaports. Chattel Slavery was unknown to Europe, at the time of settlement, other than Iberian merchants, or former Dutch subjects of the Iberians, who learned the African slave routes from their former, non-Caucasoid, Islamic rulers.

    As to the 1776 faction, to those of us whose ancestors were in the colonies long before the USA existed, its insulting and nearly nonsensical to suggest that 1776 is the birth of a people.
    This may be useful to those who arrived in modern times, and seek to cast ‘sacred two party system inc.’ as the holy offspring of the ‘founders’, however the 1776-yankee induced conflict was fought primarily by hiring domestic mercenaries, promising them large payouts, and usually stiffing them on the promised bounty.

    The 1776 faction pretends that northern and southern colonies fought to shed the monarchy, however the ignored faction – termed ‘Westerners’ at the time – actually won the war, and largely did so with no significant assistance from either Tidewater slave-owners or Yankee merchants with monetary motivations. The major actions leading to British defeat, Cowpens and Kings Mountain, are fought by Westerners who in the case of Kings Mountain do not even notify Washington or Gates of the battle they are going to fight. At Guilford Courthouse the Virginia ‘Westerner’ Militia, fighting far away from home as volunteers, seal the end of the war. Not only are they not paid, they leave hundreds in donations with local Moravians who helped care for their wounded fighters.

    The 1780 Westerners do not fight to gain freedom.. they are already free. They defeat the British in very short time, and only when British officers – Tarleton / Ferguson – come and threaten the independent Westerner settlements, which have virtually zero slaves and consist almost entirely of men who are landowners, not bonded labor imported to service Yankee sweatshops.

    In 1832 Virginia, because so few of the general white population benefited from slavery, the Western population forced a vote to end slavery –

    “In our present case, the activists initially had to overcome the sense that they were all from Western Virginia, and thus distinct from their considerably more numerous, and slave holding, Eastern brethren.”

    “That they failed should not be a cause for reproach; instead, we might ask how it was they came so close to success. In the end, fifty-eight members voted to enact Randolph’s plan for gradual emancipation, and seventy-three voted against it. Out of one-hundred-and-thirty-one votes cast, the outcome would have been different had only eight members changed sides.”

    In the end, 1776 was a fractured fairy tale of moneyed financiers, while 1780 is my revolution – a revolution of free men who were determined to stay that way, by their own force of arms, not paid substitutes.

    • Replies: @Observator
  8. G. Poulin says:

    Sure. Normal people always oppose the schemes of our lunatic rulers. At least for a while. Then our rulers exert their power and the opposition slowly dries up. This will end when our rulers are physically overthrown, their leaders destroyed, and their followers gulagged . The other option is to endure the lunacy for eighty years, like they did in Russia, and hope that it collapses from its own absurdity.

  9. Chris Moore says: • Website
    @Trial by Wombat

    Basically, almost any popular, heavily promoted narrative that is heavily underwritten and deliberately disseminated is designed to sell and market, while the truth, unsuited to such purposes, is suppressed or punished. This principle seldom changes or deviates.

    In this case, money and power-crazed White elites and Jews “selling and marketing” the Globalist narrative, with their equally ambitious and treacherous POC clones in tow.

    The 1776 faction pretends that northern and southern colonies fought to shed the monarchy, however the ignored faction – termed ‘Westerners’ at the time – actually won the war, and largely did so with no significant assistance from either Tidewater slave-owners or Yankee merchants with monetary motivations.

    The same “enlightened” hypocrites and belly-crawling cutthroats didn’t even actually do the fighting and dying that won the nation, but managed to take a lot of the credit for it.

    As pertains the 1619 faction, the vast majority of colonial white Americans never owned or imported slaves, and the commercial importation was largely conducted by Yankee ships out of New England seaports. Chattel Slavery was unknown to Europe, at the time of settlement, other than Iberian merchants, or former Dutch subjects of the Iberians, who learned the African slave routes from their former, non-Caucasoid, Islamic rulers.

    This “elite” Globalist coalition, including POC snakes, are the real slavers, but they’re projecting their own treachery and evil — Jewish style — onto hapless Whites.

    And Trump the Chump with his Globalist Jew relatives is in on all of this. But at least Trump the Chump was “crude” enough to somewhat clue his White dupe followers in on some of this, which is why the Globalist elites hate him so.

    Unlike them, he has maybe 5% of a conscience. They’re 100% reptile and sociopath.

  10. @Trial by Wombat

    The Virginia legislature nearly voted to end slavery in 1832 because it was inundated with petitions from the citizens to do so. This was Virginians’ reaction to the Nat Turner murders the previous summer. It is often forgotten that slaveholders lived in constant terror of “the alarum bell in the night”, in Jefferson’s phrase, that would signal bloody “servile insurrection.” Their watchword was “Santo Domingo”, the Haitian city where successfully rebelling slaves massacred every white they could catch in 1791. Jefferson best summed up the dilemma of slavery with the analogy of holding a wolf by the ears: you don’t want to keep hanging on, but you certainly do not want to let go.

    I was surprised in my researches years ago to discovery this same fear ran through most of the northern antislavery movement as well. Only the wholly despised “lunatic fringe” Abolitionists proposed that blacks and whites could or should live together. But their politically astute leaders were able to harness the white-hot rage that American patriots felt when Old Glory was attacked at Fort Sumter, to push through their unpopular plan. As late as three months after the Emancipation Proclamation, Lincoln met with a group of black ministers at the White House and asked them to make the ultimate sacrifice “for the good of all the generations to come,” and consider repatriation to Africa. One wonders had he not been cut down by an assassin, perhaps Lincoln’s reputation too would have been shredded by the extremist radicals who took control of Congress.

    • Replies: @Anon
  11. Anon[407] • Disclaimer says:
    @Observator

    Lunatic fringe? You could also have said believing Christian, one who accepts that the Ethiopian eunuch converted in the Jewish-authored book of Acts is their Bruvvah in Christ. Same with Simeon the Nigger in Acts 13:1, who furthermore was elevated to a leadership role. Christians have been engaged in Negro-huggery since the founding of their foreign Jewish cult, since the founding by the Globalist/Internationist Rabbi Jewsus who sought converts from “all nations.”

    Perhaps some day, Americans will realize that Magic Jebus is as utterly ineffective as Magic Dirt.

  12. RoHa says:

    Rather comical to see the way, when any deplorable doctrine emerges, Americans brand it as “communist”. The country is still mired in the 1950s.

    • Replies: @MarkU
    , @Richard B
  13. Bert33 says:

    Defund ‘woke’ public ed, and start going through US college campuses until the ‘instructors’ get spoken to who are smearing this crap all over the blackboard. Whiteboard. Motherboard. Whatever. Higher ed gone corrupt and politicized and biased, and this is the ‘product’. For shame. Wokism will eat itself, but not before it destroys education. Cancel it, abolish compulsory education and the leftist commies who’ve made a nest for themselves within it.

  14. MarkU says:
    @RoHa

    It seems especially bizarre when those doctrines are evidently being promoted by huge corporations and billionaires.

  15. Richard B says:
    @Priss Factor

    If the Name the Jew crowd aren’t JIDF Trolls they might as well be.

    Right now you have people who didn’t name them, people who simply went to a march in Washington back in January, now languishing in a D.C. jail listening to their black jailers tell them “I hate all white people!” while beating them.

    This represents the lowest point, so far at least, in our now fully entrenched Anarcho-Tyranny. And yet you and others like you are insisting everyone name the Jew. Again, if you’re not a JIDF Troll you might as well be.

    Also, ever notice that the Name The Jew crowd never offers concrete solutions or even support for those who might name the Jew. No solidarity, no solution, no nothing. Just “Name the Jew” repeated over and over again, like the chattering of an idiot, only far less interesting and not at all productive of any positive results. Nothing. Just “Name the Jew.” Morons.

    Even more discrediting, ever notice that when they’re called out they respond like the snowflakes they pretend to despise (when they’re really just jealous that the other brand of snowflakes have more power than them). Meaning, as soon as another commenter calls them on their obvious BS they BING! hit the Bitch Bell and start crying like little girls.

    When none of that works they resort to accusing the accuser.

    I’m not the JIDF Troll. You’re the JIDF Troll.

    Pathetic!

    Until the Name the Jew crowd can prove they are not JIDF Trolls everyone should assume they are. Or, if not, then guaranteed they are nothing more than a pack of Dunning-Kruger Dumbshit Trolls who don’t at all deserve to be taken seriously, but definitely deserve to be laughed at.

    They’re like those adult-child Right-wingers who bragged online for years that they’d easily win a Civil War because the other side was filled with Sissy Marys. Ignoring the obvious fact that the Right has been cucking to the Left throughout the entire Western world ever since the French Revolution.

    Identifying the source of any problem is just one step and means nothing if the other steps aren’t followed through to a successful completion.

    So, in this particular case, it must come with solidarity, protection, personal sacrifice, and intelligent workable long-term solutions and a well-organized, well-funded and highly motivated critical mass (at the very least), not to mention a headquarters.

    Does anyone see that happening, ever? I sure don’t.

    But, it’d obviously have to. And the action should be taken by those insisting we properly identify the problem and “Name the Jew.”

    If not, you’re a troll for them or yourself. Either way, you’re a joke.

    • Replies: @Priss Factor
  16. Richard B says:
    @RoHa

    The country is still mired in the 1950s.

    Worse, the Communists are still in the 1850’s.

    But I’d love to see more people ditch the whole Right/Left paradigm.

    This short video shows the connection between The Communist Manifesto and Woke Inc., focusing particularly on the whole Build Back Better mantra.

    And it does it by actually quoting from both. It’s obviously not exhaustive. But it at least points in the right direction.

  17. @Richard B

    Right now you have people who didn’t name them, people who simply went to a march in Washington back in January, now languishing in a D.C. jail listening to their black jailers tell them “I hate all white people!” while beating them.

    Those people are likely ‘Christian Zionist’ types. Trump’s AMERICA FIRST has been ZION FIRST. They are idiots who worship Jews, the very people who persecute them.

    This represents the lowest point, so far at least, in our now fully entrenched Anarcho-Tyranny. And yet you and others like you are insisting everyone name the Jew.

    The people at Jan 6 followed Q-non and blamed China, Iran, and Venezuela than Jews. If they’d focused on the real culprit, they’d be in a much better situation. They attack and blame everything but Jewish Power. That’s why they fail.

    Also, ever notice that the Name The Jew crowd never offers concrete solutions or even support for those who might name the Jew. No solidarity, no solution, no nothing.

    Solutions follow the naming of the fact. Before doctors treat the disease, the disease has to be identified. Only then can the treatment commence.
    The reason why we keep saying ‘Name the Jew’ is because most conzos aren’t even in the disease-identification stage, and that goes for the ‘dissident right’ as well.
    Once most white folks identify the problem, THEN the program of countering and resisting Jewish Power can begin.
    I say NAME THE JEW, and once people understand who they enemy is, the next stage is WHITE LIBERATION from Jewish Supremacism. Gandhi understood this. Once the Indian Nationalist movement got started by seeing the British as imperialist occupiers, the program was non-participation with the imperialist system. Once the Jew is named as the real supremacist force in the US and the world, white people must stop supporting and taking part in the grand Jewish scheme. Jews think “We have a scheme”, and whites must say, “We have a meme”, and the meme identifies the nature of Jewish Power.

    Once the Jew is named, there can be solidarity in whites standing against Jewish supremacism. But the problem isn’t merely that the Jew is unnamed but that he is revered and praised EVEN THOUGH the likes of Soros are pulling the strings against white nations.

    “I’m not the JIDF Troll. You’re the JIDF Troll.”

    In your case, this is probably true as your case is so weak.

    Ignoring the obvious fact that the Right has been cucking to the Left throughout the entire Western world ever since the French Revolution.

    French Revolution was nationalist. It is wrong to see leftism as the problem. Leftism is good to an extent, just like rightism is good to an extent. Both must be used together. French Revolution was populist and was directed against the aristocracy. It led to great people power in France, and the French Revolution spread freedom across Europe for the common folks. It went wrong because Napoleon got overly ambitious and invaded Russia.
    Jews are powerful because they use rightism and leftism together. Zionism is a combo of nationalism, capitalism, and socialism.
    Jews want white people to see things in terms of left vs right. This way, ‘leftist’ whites will hate ‘rightist’ whites and vice versa, when in fact, so much can be done by taking good leftism and good rightism and using them together… as with fascism.

    What you’re basically saying is this:

    “Jews will kick your ass real bad. Look at Jan 6. If Jews do that to milquetoast conzos, imagine what they will do to you IF you name the Jew. So, to save your own ass, shhhhhhhh about the Jews.”

    But naming the Jew is a losing game ONLY IF you also salute Hitler. I say reject Jewish supremacism and also the various strains of white supremacism. Richard Spencer had a great opportunity with the Alt Right but failed because …. he read some Neeeeeeeetchaaaaaaa and figured HE is the ubermensch Anglo-dude who should rule the world as 007-Vader. He countered Jewish supremacism with white supremacism.

    But if people name the Jew(meaning Jewish supremacism) and champion humanism over supremacism, things can change. But of course, you don’t want that because you want white submission to Jewish supremacism.

    • Replies: @Richard B
  18. KenH says:

    National Review, for example, concedes that “obviously” the “legacy of racism” should be taught in American schools, but argues that CRT specifically is bad

    So once again a “conservative” publication partially accepts the premises made by the radical left that America was steeped in white racism and backwardness pre 1965. What a shock. The cuckservative case for a CRT curriculum that is slightly less offensive to cuckservative sensibilities!

    Instead, it’s people who really believe in colorblindness pushing back against an effort to make everything about race.

    I tend to agree. Unfortunately the backlash among whites isn’t so much a sign of nascent pro-white racial consciousness as it is their hardheaded loyalty to race neutrality and race blindness which has been the America credo since 1965 and probably before. Race blind meritocracy resonates mostly with whites while non-whites are increasingly demanding racial nationalism and special privileges for themselves.

    Disappointingly, it seems most white Americans desperately want this multiracial shit show to work. Instead, white Americans should be tuning out and withdrawing all moral support from the U.S. government which is just a tool to oppress them. America will eventually fall but we’ll at least be race blind when it does.

    CRT is what you get with a multiracial population (thanks to mass third world immigration) coupled with a hostile Jewish elite who fear and loathe the founding white stock of America. It’s designed to guilt trip whites into acceding to second class status, dispossession and eventual genocide.

  19. Richard B says:
    @Priss Factor

    Once most white folks identify the problem, THEN the program of countering and resisting Jewish Power can begin.

    You indulge in magical thinking like that and say my case is weak?

    Regarding my case, you went through a lot of trouble just to knock down a strawman of your own making. Again, if you’re not a JIDF Troll you might as well be.

    Either way, you’re exactly the kind of unreflective thinker who hurts his own cause way more than your enemy ever could. You’re making it easy for them.

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All James Kirkpatrick Comments via RSS