The Unz Review: An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 Tobias Langdon Archive
Efface the Facts: White Supremacism in the Jewish Community
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

Who remembers Isaiah Young-Sam? His family and friends certainly do, but Britain’s liberal elite certainly don’t. That’s puzzling, because he was a young Black man murdered at the age of 23 in a particularly shocking way: “stabbed through the heart as he fled a baying gang wielding chains, baseball bats and knives, who hunted him down simply because he was black.”

Savages still at large

Isaiah Young-Sam was a devout Christian, a gentle, law-abiding young man who worked for Birmingham City Council in the English Midlands. And he was brutally murdered “simply because he was black.” Why have the liberal elite forgotten him? And why are the liberal elite not outraged that his racist killers are still at large? Since his murder in 2005, the authorities have tried and failed to bring those racists to justice. Three men were jailed in 2006, but their convictions were overturned on appeal and Isaiah Young-Sam’s family still don’t have what liberals call “closure.”

Worse still, his family live in fear of the racists: when an uncle discussed the case in 2012, the uncle “asked not to be identified for fear of reprisals.” Given all this, you would expect Isaiah Young-Sam to have a martyr-cult like the one that surrounds Stephen Lawrence, the young man murdered in London in 1993 “simply for being black.” A Jewish “anti-racist” called Dr Richard Stone has been the High Priest in the Lawrence martyr-cult, supplying the high intelligence and ease with officialdom lacked by the martyr’s mother Doreen Lawrence. But Dr Stone and other Jewish activists have shown no such interest in Isaiah Young-Sam. This is puzzling when you consider that the two racist murders were very similar, except that Isaiah Young-Sam’s murder was worse. Stephen Lawrence was stabbed in a chance encounter and might easily have survived. Isaiah Young-Sam was “hunted down” by a “baying gang” who were fully intent on killing any Black they could catch.

The wrong kind of racist

Isaiah Young-Sam, a victim of hate ignored by the liberal elite
Isaiah Young-Sam, a victim of hate ignored by the liberal elite

But Britain’s liberal elite forgot Isaiah Young-Sam long ago. They’ve never added his name to their Big Book of Minority Martyrs and, unlike Stephen Lawrence, he hasn’t been the subject of an endless stream of books, articles, TV programmes and radio broadcasts. Why so? It’s simple. Isaiah Young-Sam has not been turned into a minority martyr because he was murdered by the wrong kind of racist. His killers were brown-skinned Pakistani Muslims. Therefore his murder is useless to the liberal elite. It can’t be used for promoting the lie that ordinary Whites are an ominous and ever-present threat to the lives and well-being of gentle, vulnerable non-Whites.

In other words, the liberal elite don’t really care about “racism” or about the welfare of non-Whites. They care about attacking Whites in order to expand and strengthen their own power. That’s why they efface the facts whenever the facts contradict their lies. And so Stephen Lawrence has an official martyr-cult and Isaiah Young-Sam has nothing. You can see the same agenda at work in British towns and cities like Rotherham, where the philo-Semitic Labour MP Denis MacShane worked tirelessly for Jewish interests but did nothing to help the “at least 1,400” White girls who were being raped, prostituted, beaten and sometimes murdered by brown-skinned Pakistani Muslims.

Afghan predators hunting White prey

And if you cross the North Sea, you’ll find the same agenda at work in Sweden, whose liberal elite claim deep concern for women’s welfare and deep abhorrence for all forms of sexual violence. The liberal elite in Sweden are lying, because they are perfectly happy to ignore women’s welfare when non-Whites are harming it. They efface the facts just as readily as the liberal elite in Britain:

The annual We Are Sthlm music festival attracts some 200,000 people, mostly aged between 13 and 19, to Kungsträdgården Park in central Stockholm. On a balmy evening in August 2015, a middle-aged psychologist, whom the author calls Hans, as he wishes to remain anonymous, took his teenage relatives to the festival. As twilight fell, he noticed how groups of men and boys appeared and began “eyeing the young girls in hot pants”. During the evening he saw girl after girl stagger out from the crowd to ask for help from the security guards after being sexually assaulted.

Afterwards Hans was haunted by the memory of “watching packs of predators hunt helpless prey”, and was shocked that nothing appeared in the press the next day. When he emailed the Dagens Nyheternewspaper, a journalist called him. Although she sounded interested, when he mentioned that “the vast majority” of the perpetrators “appeared to be Afghans”, her tone became “noticeably colder”. No article appeared, leaving Hans angry that “in a country that claims to be one of the most feminist places on earth”, no one cared. (Sweden’s Dark Soul by Kajsa Norman review – ‘far from a utopia’, The Guardian, 20th December 2018)

One irony in that damning story in the Guardian is that Dagens Nyheter (Today’s News) is Sweden’s equivalent of the Guardian. It’s edited by a Jew called Peter Wolodarski, who is also the Guardian’s go-to guy for commentary on Swedish affairs. Just like the Guardian, when Dagens Nyheter is given a choice between defending women’s welfare and collaborating with non-White “rape culture,” it doesn’t hesitate a second. It collaborates with rape culture. The Guardianmade the same choice in Rotherham and many other places: it did nothing to help the White girls who were being raped and prostituted.

Worse than nothing

Similarly, Dagens Nyheter did nothing to help the girls who were sexually assaulted at the We Are Sthlm music festival. Jews like Peter Wolodarski cannot advance their own power by defending White girls against non-White abusers. Therefore they do nothing.

Peter Wolodarski, fake feminist
Peter Wolodarski, fake feminist

And worse than nothing. Another of Sweden’s liberal elite is a Jewish sociologist called Jerzy Sarnecki (pronounced Sarnetski), who “prominently features in the [Swedish] media as an expert on all things crime-related.” Sarnecki has recently done his best to dismiss crime-statistics showing that migrants and their offspring are hugely over-represented as rapists in Sweden and form the “vast majority” of gang-rapists. In other words, Sarnecki isn’t merely effacing the facts: he is actively denying them and trying to help non-Whites commit more and worse crimes against Swedish Whites.

Jerzy Sarnecki, fake feminist
Jerzy Sarnecki, fake feminist

Is Katherine Viner, the editor of the Guardian, also Jewish? I can’t prove it, but I strongly suspect she is. Britain certainly has many Jews in its liberal elite working hard to promote lies about Whites and censor the truth about non-Whites. Andrew Joyce and Francis Carr Begbie of the Occidental Observer have described the anti-White, pro-minority labours of Jews like Jonathan Freedland and David Aaronovitch.

Katherine Viner (second from left) and other Guardian journalists
Katherine Viner (second from left) and other Guardian journalists

But Freedland and Aaronovitch are writing for the goyim in newspapers founded by goyim, so what do journalists say at specifically Jewish newspapers like the Jewish Chronicle? I’ve described how the Chronicle often lets the truth slip by peddling “anti-Semitic stereotypes” that no mainstream gentile writer would dare to touch. For example, the Chronicle has likened Margaret Thatcher to a Jew because Thatcher displayed “paranoia, arrogance and insecurity.” It has claimed that“many in the Jewish community … like being close to power.” It has also exposed a cover-up when the Jewish politician Jeremy Newmark brought an anti-Semitic stereotype to life by lying and cheating with psychopathic abandon.

White supremacism at the Jewish Chronicle

White Supremacism #1: Jewish baby with Jewish parent
White Supremacism #1: Jewish baby with Jewish parent

But the Chronicle’s reporting on Jewish affairs is interesting not just for what it says, but also for what it shows – that is, for the images it chooses to accompany certain stories. I would say it shows “white supremacism” in its choice of imagery. When it ran a story celebrating the fact that “Jewish births rose three times higher than the British [average],” it accompanied the story with a photo of a very pink baby being touched by a very white parent’s hand. I think it was a stock photo of a White baby, not something taken in a Jewish hospital. In other words, the Chronicle was effacing the facts: it chose a White baby to represent a Jewish baby. For the Chronicle, “Jewish” obviously meant “white.”

White Supremacism #2: Jewish children in a classroom
White Supremacism #2: Jewish children in a classroom

And when the Chronicle ran a story lamenting the fact that seven-year-old Jewish girls at an Orthodox female-only primary school in London are “still unable to read fluently,” it accompanied the story with a photo of some very white girls raising their hands in a classroom. The girls have long hair and look like miniature versions of the “Beckys,” or White women, who are often now attacked in the American media for “racism” against Blacks. But if you look closer at the photo, you can see that the mini-Beckys are accompanied by a White boy. The Chronicle has obviously looked for a stock photo of White children in a classroom and hasn’t worried that the photo didn’t fully fit its story about a female-only primary school. For the Chronicle, “Jewish” again obviously meant “white.” It was effacing the facts again.

Original advert as animated gif
Original advert as animated gif

And what about a child-welfare advert run by the Chronicle and other Jewish newspapers? The advert wasn’t a random stock photo, but something specifically created for “Jewish Child’s Day.” It was an animated image of a White boy with pale skin and blue eyes whose face is progressively disfigured by dark bruises. That is why the advert is powerful: it shows light assailed by darkness. If you changed the text, you could run exactly the same image for “Aryan Child’s Day,” because the boy does not look Jewish.

White Supremacism #3: a blue-eyed Jewish boy
White Supremacism #3: a blue-eyed Jewish boy

Pallidity is pulchritude

White Supremacism #4: a pale Jewish beauty – the prominent white text says “Your Daughter” in Hebrew
White Supremacism #4: a pale Jewish beauty – the prominent white text says “Your Daughter” in Hebrew

The same “white supremacist” iconography appears in a story about Israel run by the Chronicle in October 2018. Ha-Bayit Ha-Yehudi or The Jewish Home is “an Orthodox Jewish, religious Zionist political party” whose leader, Naftali Bennett, is the Israeli minister of education (and has been accused by the Chronicle of “defaming the diaspora”). In October the Chronicle reported that Bennett’s party used some interesting posters for a municipal election in the Israeli city of Ramle(also known as Ramleh).

The posters showed an attractive pale-skinned Jewish girl in a hijab accompanied by this stark warning in Hebrew: “Hundreds of cases of intermarriage in Ramle, and no one cares. Tomorrow it could be your daughter. Only a strong Jewish Home will maintain a Jewish Ramle.”

White Supremacism #5: a future Jewish warrior
White Supremacism #5: a future Jewish warrior

The Chronicle condemned the posters as “Islamophobic,” but didn’t condemn the image chosen to represent a Jewish girl. After all, like Ha-Bayit Ha-Yehudi, the Chronicle thinks that “Jewish” means “white.” But it wasn’t Ha-Bayit Ha-Yehudi who were behind another White supremacist poster in Israel. Instead, it was “one of Israel’s top hospitals,” which issued a poster of a white-skinned and white-featured Jewish foetus floating in the womb while wearing a military beret and performing a military salute. Translated from Hebrew, the accompanying text runs: “Recipient of the Presidential Award of Excellence, 2038.”

I didn’t see this poster mentioned in the Jewish Chronicle, but it was condemned by Jewish liberals at +972 Magazine, which said: “The notion that a good hospital will produce good soldiers is pathological. That a top hospital believes the best way to get women to choose their maternity ward is by convincing them their baby is destined to be a successful soldier in the Israel Defense Forces is also a genuine indication of just how militaristic Israeli society is.”

White is Right

Well, yes, Israeli society is militaristic, but it’s also “white supremacist,” because Israel’s Ashkenazi elite clearly regard pale skin and goyish features as the ideal. After all, dark-skinned Mizrahi Jews from Arab countries still complain that David Ben-Gurion, the Ashkenazi Jew who was Israel’s founder and first prime minister, “didn’t want them” in the country. Ben-Gurion worried that Mizrahi children would “descend to the level of Arab children” and claimed that “in the past few hundred of years the Jews of Europe have led the nation [i.e., Jewish people], in both quantity and quality.”

But there’s worse. Black Ethiopian Jews in Israel complain long and bitterly that prejudice and mistreatment keep them rooted at the bottom of Israeli society. Israel has allegedly tried to limit the numbers of Black Jews with the powerful contraceptive Devo-Provera. And white-skinned Israelis abuse Black Jews with the hateful term kushi, the Hebrew equivalent of “nigger” (like “nigger,” which originally meant simply “black,” kushi was a geographic term that has acquired a derogatory meaning). Israel is undoubtedly a Jewish supremacist state, but part of Jewish supremacism is “white supremacism.” Jews at newspapers like the Jewish Chronicle and in parties like Ha-Bayit Ha-Yehudi choose to portray Jews with white skins and classically “white European” features – just see the images above.

Goyifying Ginsburg

And see the article “Ruth Bader Ginsburg… Shiksa?” by the Jewish writer David Cole at Taki Mag. I had prepared this article long before I read what Cole had to say, so I was pleased to see that he confirms my claims:

Christmas is supposed to be a holiday for Christians, but this year Santa’s bringing a very special present for America’s Jews: the gift of seeing Ruth Bader Ginsburg the way we wish she looked. Opening in theaters December 25th, On the Basis of Sex tells the story of a plucky young RBG as she risks everything in a quest to become a nationally known feminist hero. …

Felicity Jones
Felicity Jones
Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Ruth Bader Ginsburg

The actress portraying the young Ginsburg is Birmingham-born Felicity Jones, a Brit who is most definitely not Jewish, unlike the brittle SCOTUS [Supreme Court of the United States] scarecrow she’s portraying. In fact, Jones could not look less Jewish if she tried. This girl is so Aryan, she could give Himmler’s corpse a boner. And yet she’s portraying a woman who — hmm, how to put this gently? — is the reason Jewish men often date outside the flock. Not since Warren Beatty decided to portray Dick Tracy without facial prosthetics has there been a greater physical disconnect between actor and subject.

… What I’m interested in is how little outrage the goyification of Ginsburg has provoked. Indeed, as the most influential racial/ethnic group in Hollywood, Jews don’t just tolerate goyifying, they’re the ones doing it. Let’s look at that most sacred of Jewish cinematic genres: the Holocaust film. The movie that launched it all — NBC’s 1978 miniseries Holocaust — starred as the doomed family of Jews a parade of gentiles, including James Woods (not Jewish), Fritz Weaver (very not Jewish), and Meryl Streep (a descendant of William Penn… very very not Jewish). …

So why do we see such a markedly different reaction from Jews as compared with blacks when it comes to being racially/ethnically altered for the screen? Well, there are several reasons. The first is something I’ve written about before — the remarkable Jewish ability to be either white or “ethnic” depending on the needs of the moment. Jews don’t mind being seen as white; we just don’t want to be seen as white when it disadvantages us. Portraying Holocaust victims as strapping Aryans is to our benefit. It makes the Huns who Holocausted us feel perhaps a little bit more guilty, because now they see their own likeness in the faces of Hitler’s victims. “Look what you did, you monsters… you just gassed Frodo Baggins” (Elijah Wood, extraordinarily not Jewish, killed in a death camp by Gary Sinise in 1992’s The Witness).

So we don’t mind the idealized images, because in a way they give us comfort. We don’t see what we can never become, but what we can [with the help of plastic surgery]. … She [Ginsburg]’s probably as pumped as everyone else to see her ethnically cleansed onscreen depiction.

Well, actually, not everyone’s pumped. It took some searching, but I finally found a roaring dissent in the sea of silence regarding the Ginsburg/Jones ethnic switcheroo. Marissa Korbel is a self-described “bleeding heart lawyer” and “award-winning essayist” who writes for Harper’s Bazaar, Guernica, and Bitch magazine. Last week, she penned a piece for the online literary journal The Rumpus that I’d wager is the single most honest piece of writing on the ’net regarding Jews and the Aryanization of Ruth Bader Ginsburg. … But don’t expect Korbel’s essay to be picked up by national Jewish news and opinion sites. Even its concluding and comforting descent into leftist banality can’t make up for the disquieting honesty of the rest of it. We Jews are generally an introspective lot, but every now and then we encounter an abyss into which even we prefer not to gaze, lest we find Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s Semitic mug gazing back at us. (“Ruth Bader Ginsburg… Shiksa?”, Taki Mag, 25th December 2018)

Jew turns into shiksa: RBG and Felicity Jones

This is another way in which Jews “efface the facts.” The actress chosen to represent Ginsburg is a shiksa and doesn’t have “Ginsburg’s Semitic mug.” But that isn’t the full story, because Jews do sometimes try to promote women like Barbra Streisand and Sarah Jessica Parker as sex-symbols, although Streisand and Parker too have clearly “Semitic mugs.”

Goyification is glorification

Nevertheless, Cole’s neologism “goyification” is a very useful term and describes a real phenomenon in Jewish culture and iconography. The images above from the Jewish Chronicle and +972 Magazine are all goyified. They’re supposed to represent Jews, but the Jews look like goys. And goyification is also glorification. As David Cole says, Jews want to look like Whites. They don’t want to gaze into the physiognomic “abyss” and find “Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s Semitic mug gazing back.”

However, this glorification and envy of White features can also be accompanied by hatred and a desire to harm Whites. Jews promote mass immigration and race-mixing in part because they feel safer in atomized, culturally and ethnically chaotic societies. But I would also suggest that they promote these things because they like the idea of destroying Whiteness. From the Jewish point of view, it would be a delicious irony if Jews acquired and retained White faces even as Whites lost them thanks to race-mixing. That would be effacing the facts to the max.

(Republished from The Occidental Observer by permission of author or representative)
 
Hide 33 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. However, this glorification and envy of White features can also be accompanied by hatred and a desire to harm Whites. Jews promote mass immigration and race-mixing in part because they feel safer in atomized, culturally and ethnically chaotic societies. But I would also suggest that they promote these things because they like the idea of destroying Whiteness.

    Useless garbage. Euro Jews are mostly indistinguishable from other whites (some are, but this is on the fringes). There are psychopathic Euro-Jews who hate everything Western, but they’re easily identifiable marginal lunatics. Most Israelis are, on the hand, mixed & don’t think in these terms: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mtKAKRNK3YY

    • Replies: @Haxo Angmark
    , @DFH
    , @Anon
    , @Anon
  2. is Katherine “Viner” Jewish?

    is grass green? is shit brown? is the sky blue?

    “Viner” is the standard phonetic de-Jewing of (((“Weiner”))).

  3. @Bardon Kaldian

    “Euro-Jews”. i.e. Ashkenaz

    are Khazars, out of Asia. And,

    as such are distinguished by numerous physical, psychological, and behavioral tropes…

    …provided your Jewdar is sufficiently tuned. Do so @

    http://seductivejewess4.com

    and the Ashkenaz are murderously anti-White. That’s why

    (((They))) are at the leading edge of White-genociding

    open-borders orc-insourcing and the White birthrate-killing

    kosher Culture of Death: abortion, porn, sexperv, and Judeo-“feminism”.

    and, other than wanting a geographic GHQ, there is no difference between Israhellion ashkenaz and diaspora ashkenaz on the matter of #WhiteGenocide.

  4. “Is Katherine Viner, the editor of the Guardian, also Jewish? I can’t prove it, but I strongly suspect she is. “

    FreeBMD is your friend.

    Her parents are Michael P Viner and Christine Gledhill (which is a very Yorkshire name), married in Coventry in summer 1967. She has a younger brother, Patrick Charles.

    None of the possible Christine Gledhills have very Jewish-sounding maternal names and they’re all from “oop North”. The only Michael P Viner was born in Surrey SE in early 1944, mother’s name Simpson, there’s a marriage in the same registration area Spring 1940 between Harold V (Vic?) Viner (seemingly born Medway area) and Winifred Simpson.

    These records aren’t 100% , but the odds seem against it.

    Maybe this is more relevant, from Wiki

    “During her 20s, Viner spent most of her holidays in the Middle East, a region in which she has a particular interest, spending time in Lebanon, Syria, Israel, the West Bank and other locations.”

    • Replies: @YetAnotherAnon
  5. @YetAnotherAnon

    Here’s grandpa’s obituary. Sounds Native British to me and a fine fellow to boot.

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/oct/02/vic-viner-obituary

  6. DFH says:
    @Bardon Kaldian

    There are psychopathic Euro-Jews who hate everything Western, but they’re easily identifiable marginal lunatics

    • Replies: @Bardon Kaldian
  7. @DFH

    Interesting. This somehow coincides with what I’ve thought before: US Jews as a group are not to be trusted re these matters. They’re not anti-white, mostly, but are afraid of white European identity & blind to their own actions in spreading anti-white animus.

    Euro-Jews, although they differ from country to country, are not radical anti-white “activists” & enemies of traditional national European cultures. Yet, their politically active identitarians are loud & also blinded to unpleasant traits of their behavior. They can probably be subdivided into 3-4 categories & I guess that ca. 10-15% of their population is inimical to host European nations.

    • Replies: @DFH
  8. DFH says:
    @Bardon Kaldian

    They’re not anti-white

    Supporting affirmative action, being even less likely than blacks to want America to preserve its white heritage, and also being the only group that supports affirmative action more when told it hurts whites is anti-white.

    More recently, a 2009 Quinnipiac University Poll asked if affirmative action programs that give preferences to Blacks and other minorities should be continued the general public favored abolishing such programs by a margin of 19 points while Jews favored continuing such programs by a margin of 4 points.

    When asked if affirmative action policies were worth pursuing even if they resulted in fewer opportunities for Whites, the general-public said “no” by a margin of 30 points. Jews said “yes” by a margin of 9 points. Note that the general public increased its opposition to these programs when it was specified that Whites would be hurt by affirmative action and Jews actually did the opposite

    https://ideasanddata.wordpress.com/2018/04/24/the-jewish-question-an-empirical-examiniation/

    Euro-Jews, although they differ from country to country, are not radical anti-white “activists” & enemies of traditional national European cultures

    The main anti-racism think tank in Britain, the Runnymede Trust, was founded by two Jews. Both the Chairman (David Isaac) and the CEO (Rebecca Hilsenrath) of the governments anti-racism body (the Equality and Human Rights Commission) are Jewish. The largest ‘anti-fascist’ group in Britain is a front for the Socialist Workers Party, founded and led by Yigael Gluckstein. The other significant anti-fascist group ‘Searchlight’ was also founded and run for decades by a Jew, Gerry Gable.

    So, Jews are gigantically overrepresented among the leadership of radical anti-white activists, and (along with, to a lesser extent, non-whites) founded the UK’s leading anti-white organisations.

    Jews do seem to be overrepresented in some other things, perhaps just because of their higher intelligence (Lynn estimates IQ in British Jews at about 110), for example, in fellows of Oxford and Cambridge colleges (an extremely high intellectual level), Jews have comprised about 5%. But, their over-representation in the anti-white activities that I have just been describing is obviously much much higher than that, so can’t just be explained by intelligence.

    • Replies: @Bardon Kaldian
  9. Why should it be surprising that bigotry against the outsider exists in every ethnic community?

  10. @DFH

    Supporting affirmative action, being even less likely than blacks to want America to preserve its white heritage, and also being the only group that supports affirmative action more when told it hurts whites is anti-white.

    That’s what make such stats not very reliable. For instance, 2nd table shows that both blacks & white democrats want to preserve American white heritage more than Jews.

    Sorry, having in mind life’s realities, this is ludicrous. US Jews’ leading role in popularization & dissemination of 19th-20th C European high culture in the US (translators & interpreters of Nietzsche, Heidegger, Dostoevsky, Joyce, cubism, various types of high Modernism, existentialism, their role as violin virtuosi & patrons & collectors of European art, their staunch support of Euro-centric culture, even from opposing positions (Stephen Greenblatt, Harold Bloom, ..)-this all shows that such stats are not reliable.

    Or their glorification of Americana (Deadwoood etc.)

    I’m not saying it’s fake news, but evidently shallow & one-dimensional. Of course there is much animosity or indifference from LaShaniqua who has never heard of Hermann Broch or Joe Sixpack who thinks Stravinsky is a Bolshevik subversive.

    The above stats are not representative.

    As for the link to Lynn’s pamphlet (or a distillation of it, it is a typical of something I call MacDonald school of debate: ahistorical, tendentious, frequently ill-informed & generally misunderstanding everything, simultaneously trying to gain respectability with inundation of (unnecessary) numbers).

    What, after all, means that some Jews have promoted immigration in Britain? British society, strong enough, would dismiss such outright. Now, Jeremy Corbin leads a suicidal immigration demographic policy.

    And, who he is, judging by his sympathies? An extreme pro-Palestinian leftist who will be, if elected, bad news for all Jews in the UK-and all white Britons. What then could they do? What could all these loony organizations accomplish? And whom they, in actuality, represent?

    Lord Rothschild was probably the most important person in Victorian England & what, in the end, did he do which collided with British Imperial interests? Nothing.

    And the IQ stuff is overrated, there is no reliable stats re Jewish IQ (even if IQ means anything of importance).

    • Replies: @DFH
  11. DFH says:
    @Bardon Kaldian

    I don’t really care about your random, unsubstantiated opinions to be honest

    • Replies: @Bardon Kaldian
  12. @DFH

    You simply don’t know what to say.

    The thesis goes like: UK Jews are consciously undermining white Britain (they head those immigration lobby groups trying to bring in as many non-whites as possible).

    And, lo & behold- chief current “anti-white” politician is far left antisemitic Jeremy Corbin, as there had been most important UK politicians in past 50 years, none of them Jewish & none of them “in Jewish pocket”. They, apart from M. Thatcher, flooded Britain with blacks & Pakistanis without any connection with anything ethnically Jewish.

    Also, US Jews- most of them immigrants from Europe 1900-1940- did more to promote European cultural currents & identities in the US than any other ethnic-racial group (English, Swedes, French, Italians, Germans,…). What’s their anti-white “activity” (or anti-European) in practice, except for these meaningless stats?

    Twain was right about lies, damned lies & stats.

  13. DFH says:
    @Bardon Kaldian

    And, lo & behold- chief current “anti-white” politician is far left antisemitic Jeremy Corbin

    Momentum (huge organisation supporting Jeremy Corbyn) was founded and run by a Jew. Momentum is ‘just so Jewish’ according to a prominent (Jewish) Momentum activist.

    https://www.thejc.com/news/uk-news/momentum-is-so-jewish-claims-leading-labour-activist-1.463274
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jon_Lansman

    as there had been most important UK politicians in past 50 years, none of them Jewish & none of them “in Jewish pocket”.They, apart from M. Thatcher, flooded Britain with blacks & Pakistanis without any connection with anything ethnically Jewish.

    The most important UK politicians with regard to ‘anti-racism’ and immigration were Jewish, as I documented above, to which can be added Barbara Roche, Jack Straw and David Miliband, who were all important politicians in their own right. Most immigration came after 1997, because of the changes these people had made to the immigration system. The chief fundraiser for New Labour, Michael Levy, was Jewish. From 2010 until 2016, at least one of the Conservative party chairmen, who are responsible for raising money for the party, (for 3 years both) was Jewish.

    Also, US Jews- most of them immigrants from Europe 1900-1940- did more to promote European cultural currents & identities in the US than any other ethnic-racial group (English, Swedes, French, Italians, Germans,…). What’s their anti-white “activity” (or anti-European) in practice, except for these meaningless stats?

    What are statistics, next to completely unsubstantiated assertions?

    • Replies: @Bardon Kaldian
  14. @DFH

    Who cares about Barbara Roche & Miliband?

    Do Jews perceive Jeremy Corbin as an extreme antisemite?

    Yes.

    Are they hysterical about him?

    Yes.

    Is he far leftist lunatic worshipping Palestinians, Hamas & everything anti-Israeli?

    Yes.

    Does he possess ethnic white British consciousness?

    No.

    Does he want Britain to remain nationally British?

    No.

    Is he in Jews’ pocket?

    No.

    Is he just a front for some powerful shady anti- British organizations?

    No.

    If elected, will he pursue anti- Israel policy?

    Yes, in all likelihood.

    So, where is this extremely influential Jewish anti-British lobby or a cluster of interest groups that tries, repeatedly, to undermine normal, traditional British society?

    Better look to your own degeneracy & cultural devaluation which started with swinging London & crucifixion of Enoch Powell.


    In tragic life, God wot,
    No villain need be!
    Passions spin the plot:
    We are betray’d
    by what is false within.

    • Replies: @DFH
  15. DFH says:
    @Bardon Kaldian

    Who cares about Barbara Roche & Miliband?

    The millions of people who have suffered from the negative effects of their immigration policies should.

    Nothing you said contradicts any of my previous points.

    So, where is this extremely influential Jewish anti-British lobby or a cluster of interest groups that tries, repeatedly, to undermine normal, traditional British society?

    In all of the ‘anti-racist’ groups founded and led by Jews which I previously named.

    Better look to your own degeneracy & cultural devaluation which started with swinging London & crucifixion of Enoch Powell.

    The Rivers of Blood speech was in response to the Race Relations Acts of 1965 and 1968, which were written by Anthony Lester (Jewish) and passed by a Jewish solicitor general. The ‘anti-racist’ groups which attacked Powell’s supporters were founded and led by Jews.

    • Replies: @Bardon Kaldian
  16. @Bardon Kaldian

    “chief current “anti-white” politician is far left antisemitic Jeremy Corbin”

    Corbyn, who I cordially detest, is not anti-semitic, he’s merely relatively neutral vis a vis Israel/Palestine.

    Of course for some people anything other than 110% support for Israel (a la Blair/Cameron/May) is ipso facto antisemitic.

    It’s an interesting commentary on the priorities of the current British political and media elite, that when Corbyn was elected no one who counted cared about him having the IRA leadership to tea within weeks of the murders of British MPs at Brighton, whereas they were apoplectic that he may once have delivered a speech at the same venue where a Hamas supporter spoke.

    • Replies: @Bardon Kaldian
  17. @DFH

    The millions of people who have suffered from the negative effects of their immigration policies should.

    Nothing you said contradicts any of my previous points.

    Everything I said contradicts your conspiratorial point of view. Barbara Roche was a member in Blair’s cabinet. Who, at the end of the day, called the shots re immigratuion?

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3466485/How-Blair-cynically-let-two-million-migrants-Explosive-biography-reveals-PM-s-conspiracy-silence-immigration-debate.html

    Conman Blair’s cynical conspiracy to deceive the British people and let in 2million migrants against the rules: Explosive new biography lays ex-PM’s betrayal bare

    So- was it Roche (and perhaps some other Jews) a person ultimately responsible for accelerated immigration inundation ? I don’t care about her; I just want others to say explicitly that some Jewish cabal is secretly running UK & that PM is not more than a front.

    And when this is said – the entire discussion becomes absurd. There is nothing to discuss.

    In all of the ‘anti-racist’ groups founded and led by Jews which I previously named.

    So, British Jewish lobbying groups actually run British policy in significant matters?

    They certainly are responsible for:

    Rotherham
    Telford
    turning UK gradually into a police state
    British anti-Russian policy (in all matters)
    ….

    There is no way to discuss anything rational with conspiracy aficionados. This whole world-view is simplistic & cartoonish.

    • Replies: @DFH
    , @Back2Black
  18. Strongly-identifying Jew, Zionist And Labour Party donor Michael Foster launched “Creative Access” in 2012 “with a mission to change the face of the media”. Handsomely funded by UK taxpayers, the organization works to replace white British people working in broadcasting, journalism, advertising, publishing, and other assorted media and creative jobs with black and brown people.

  19. DFH says:
    @Bardon Kaldian

    Your own link says that Blair himself was uninterested in immigration and so let Barbara Roche change the rules.

    At the heart of the problem was Blair’s complete lack of interest — though this would come back to haunt him.

    The most incredible revelations concern Barbara Roche, a little-known MP who was immigration minister between 1999 and 2001. During this period, she quietly adopted policies – with Mr Blair’s approval – that changed the face of the UK.

    ‘He wasn’t interested. And nor was Blair,’ she said. ‘[Blair] didn’t understand the process and wasn’t interested in the detail . . . He was shallow. He had no grasp of immigration policy. There was no policy.’

    In fact, she apparently sometimes contradicted the efforts he did make to control the worst abusers of asylum rules.

    Blair’s only instruction to her was to deport bogus asylum seekers. But Roche wasn’t playing. In her first conversation with a senior immigration official, she was candid: ‘I think asylum seekers should be allowed to stay. Removal takes too long, and it’s emotional.’ Even the word ‘bogus,’ she maintained, created a negative feeling.

    This isn’t even taking into account that, as previously stated, the person responsible for raising money for New Labour, Lord Levy, was not just Jewish but deeply connected in the Jewish community. In 2015, about a third of donations for the Labour Party’s campaign came from Jewish donors. So clearly Jewish donors had disproportionate influence over the Labour party, unless you think that they are so incorruptible as to be unaffected by who gives them money.

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3532042/Ignorant-Godless-Hateful-Corbyn-s-contempt-Jews-disgrace-withering-attack-Labour-leader-donor-backed-party-400-000-2015-Election.html

  20. @YetAnotherAnon

    Corbyn is your proto-typical New Leftist who hates Israelis because they’re “whites” & colonizers. He is, ideologically, a New left lunatic. Chief tenets:

    * Western civilization-cancer, imperialism,
    * Women oppressed
    * White men patriarchy, racism, colonization & genocide
    * free sex & sexual promiscuity desirable
    * nuclear family bad, father role pernicious
    * white working class the enemy, black & brown underclass cool & the future
    * nations enemies, national identity the enemy
    * Islam cool, African cool, Indians cool, …
    * Christianity = genocide, guilt, exploitation
    * rationality & high western culture- the enemy,,,
    * miscegenation good because it leads to extinction of genocidal white race
    * legalization of drugs of paramount importance
    * gays & other sexual minorities something extremely important
    * natural human connections are gad (family, people, tribe, …)
    * human beings- replaceable

    New left ideology (Marcuse & others) have percolated in past 40 years media mainstream & that’s how Corbyn looks at Israelis.

    They’re bad because they’re historical descendants of crusaders; they’re “white”; they’re Western (technology, science, rationality,..); they’re nation-state when nation-states & pride in one nationhood is forbidden (if you’re white); they gave bloody nose to Arabs & other Middle easterners Western media had divinized so long for their fecundity & primitive religiosity; …

    The worst of all, they, Israelis, show that nation-state, not too mind-numbing religion & blood & soil is what matters most.

    • Replies: @YetAnotherAnon
  21. Anon[230] • Disclaimer says:
    @Bardon Kaldian

    LOL! Indistinguishable from other Whites?!? To whom? Deluded Jews? I can spot 90% of Jews at twenty paces with a 10% error rate for groups like Armenians, and I am especially accurate with Ashkenazim. 10%, at most, are indistinguishable. This leaves me at a 4/5 Jewdar accuracy rate. Your mistake is that you assume that mass immigration has already led to a muddy mixed multitude that are accepted as “European”. The reality is that it has only reduced the European to non-European ratio in Europe. Do not make the mistake of believing that we count your mixed multitudes as European. You only blend in with them, sort of.

  22. Anon[230] • Disclaimer says:
    @Bardon Kaldian

    There are psychopathic Euro-Jews who hate everything Western, but they’re easily identifiable marginal lunatics.

    Its amazing that these “marginal lunatics” then happen to dictate the expressed political positions of the most meaningful organizations of political Jewry like the World Jewish Congress (WJC) and the Central Council of Jews in Germany (CCJG). In fact, these “marginal lunatics” are the leaders of these organizations. Imagine the coincidence. Their positions are also consistent with those of the American Jewish Congress.

    Selections from Ronald Lauder’s (President of the WJC) and Josef Shuster’s (President of the CCJG) 2015 co-authored article originally appearing at http://www.zentralratdjuden.de/en :

    https://mysocialgoodnews.com/we-jews-understand-the-hardship-the-refugees-are-going-through/

    We Jews understand the hardship the refugees are going through

    For many years, there were complaints about the country’s unwillingness to become a country of immigration, and about a lack of a ‘culture of welcome’. Given what we saw over the last weeks, that’s obviously not the case at all.

    The Jewish community, both in Germany and world-wide, welcomes this evolution towards an open society. It is the right thing.

    It’s also important that those who at present can’t return to their home countries will become familiar with our Western values. In Germany, that means respect for the values enshrined in the Constitution and also an acceptance that support for Israel is part of the political DNA of this country. Moreover, society by and large agrees that the Holocaust must be remembered.

    The majority of refugees are courageous people. They are grateful to be permitted to live in safety here, and in turn they are willing to contribute to their host country. We should give them the chance to do so.

    In the Talmud, it is written: “He who saves a single life saves the whole world.

    Of course, this article isn’t really the most pertinent discussion.

    The point would be to discuss what Judaism believes and states in its religious texts that absolutely dictates that the nations in which the Jews are scattered will be destroyed, and how the Gods and thus the people of those nations will be subsumed and destroyed. From this position, the leaders of your most important political organizations certainly are not fringe lunatics. They are merely acting in accordance with their religious beliefs, entitlements, and prophecies.

    My response still stands, however, as one that is speaking on the level of comment.

    • Replies: @Mr McKenna
  23. @Bardon Kaldian

    Rotherham

    Ah, yeah, Rotherham, where the 100% goy politician Denis MacShane failed to spot what was happening to all those shiksas. Meanwhile, Myopic MacShy was working hard for people who really mattered.

    Why we should mourn Denis MacShane’s fall from grace

    A year ago, I wrote in these pages that the Jewish community needed to decide if it wished to stand by one of its greatest champions after he resigned as MP for Rotherham. His disgrace is greater now and there is every reason to feel disappointed in Denis and even let down. There are those who will suggest that the causes he espoused are somehow morally poisoned by the crimes to which he has admitted.

    There are certainly some who will draw comfort from the fact that such an active campaigner has been removed from the field.

    I have no doubt that, whatever happens, Denis MacShane will be back. He has reinvented himself before and he will do it again, perhaps under his original name, Denis Matyjaszek. But, for now, others must enter the rather large space he vacates fighting racism and totalitarianism. His causes are pure, even if Denis MacShane is less so.

    http://www.thejc.com/comment-and-debate/columnists/113352/why-we-should-mourn-denis-macshane%E2%80%99s-fall-grace

    Hey, look: his real name is Denis Matyjaszek. And he was failed for fraud. Name-changing, fraud, ignoring the plight of shiksas, working hard for the Community. Myopic Matyjaszek’s just gotta be Scots-Oirish, amirite?

    • Replies: @Bardon Kaldian
  24. @Bardon Kaldian

    “Corbyn is your proto-typical New Leftist who hates Israelis because they’re “whites” & colonizers. “

    So he’s not an anti-Semite. He doesn’t hate them because they’re Jews, just that they’re higher than Palestinians on the intersectional totem pole. He doesn’t even hate them because they’re white – he supported murderous Irish nationalism and Irish people are even whiter than the English.

    • Replies: @Bardon Kaldian
  25. @YetAnotherAnon

    If we judge a man by his actions, Corbyn is an antisemite (among other things). He wants destruction of only Jewish nation-state, as well as British state. No intention of destroying Germany, Poland, Italy, Vietnam, China, Japan, ….

    • Replies: @YetAnotherAnon
  26. @Back2Black

    MacShane’s father’s name is ethnic Polish, not Jewish. And, this proves- what?

    • Replies: @Back2Black
  27. @Bardon Kaldian

    That’s a very poor definition – useless in fact. He also wants the destruction of the only British nation-state. And I’m pretty sure he’s cool about the Merkel transformation of German society.

    If the Jews in historical Judea and Samaria were powerless, clinging on, oppressed by Arabs and a despised minority, Corbyn would support them wholeheartedly. It’s “who-whom?” every time with him.

    In a way, it’s sort-of admirable.

    Having been taught (by whom, I wonder – there’s a subject for a graduate thesis!) in his formative political years to see everything in terms of power relations and who’s oppressing who, he applies that lens equally to UK/Ireland and Israel/Palestine and just doesn’t get on board with the idea (accepted wholeheartedly by Blair/Cameron/May) that Israel is special and shouldn’t be judged by the standards you’d apply to the UK.

    This has caused him all sorts of problems, and still is. As I said, it’s remarkable that there are far more prominent voices against him because of Hamas than because of the IRA, though the IRA have killed far more Brits than Hamas ever have or will.

    • Replies: @Bardon Kaldian
  28. @YetAnotherAnon

    British are a special case because British expansion have made many little/big “Britains” (Canada, Australia etc.).

    I haven’t seen Corbyn espousing views that could be seen as consistent (I may be not well informed, but…): he was against Kosovo war (which is, basically, about Serbian local imperialism) & at the same time he is for Kurdish self-determination.

    He is not consistently for “little guy”, especially is this little guy is white, as is the case in contemporary SA, or if he is not white, as is the case with Tibet. Essentially, Corbyn is not consistent except in his self-hate.

  29. It’s said that Jewish broads give the best head. Is it because they are self hating, and does going down on goyim men some how ease/enforces their guilt? Or do they just love the money shot?

  30. Why the condemning of Corbin. Is it because he talks honestly? WTF!

  31. @Anon

    In the Talmud, it is written: “He who saves a single life saves the whole world.

    Between Wiki, Spielberg and Google, this is just about how it’s written nowadays.

    But we know better, don’t we?

  32. @Bardon Kaldian

    Do you believe this person should be prosecuted, or is he also railroaded by what you call ‘goyische justice’ in contravention of halakhah?

    https://www.foxnews.com/us/stockbroker-tried-framing-daughter-9-for-wifes-murder-prosecutors-say

    Seems to me, with so much money involved, it would be better to leave the goys out of it.

  33. @Bardon Kaldian

    If MacShyster has said his father was “ethnic Polish”, so what? MacShyster is a proven liar. Whatever his precise ancestry, his career certainly proves that deep concern for the welfare of the Community goes very well with utter unconcern for the welfare of goyim. And with being a liar and crook. Blair’s career proves the same.

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Tobias Langdon Comments via RSS
PastClassics
What Was John McCain's True Wartime Record in Vietnam?
Are elite university admissions based on meritocracy and diversity as claimed?