The Unz Review: An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 Kevin MacDonald Archive
Dr. Ralph Scott’s Forty-year Battle for Science in Research on Forced Busing
Angela Saini, Barry Mehler, and the Academic Left
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>
Angela Saini, British journalist. Credit: ASaini/Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 3.0

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

Angela Saini, who describes herself as a “freelance science journalist,” has written a propaganda piece on race for the Guardian (“Why race science is on the rise again”), a precis of a now-released book of the same title. You know what you are up against right from the beginning, with the phrase “so-called ‘races,’” with ‘races’ in scare quotes. She describes herself as growing up in an “Indian-Punjabi household” and appears to be yet another non-White who is campaigning against the idea that Whites are a real group—a group with interests and a long, proud history.[1]Interestingly, she seems quite proud of her genetic heritage, given the title of another of her books, Geek Nation: How Indian Science Is Taking Over the World), but the book actually paints a rather bleak picture of Indian science as mainly staffed by conformist, uninventive drones and light years behind the West and Japan. In other words, she is promoting her own ethnic interests in dismantling the West as an ethnic entity and sees herself as a lifelong victim of White racism (“racism was the backdrop to my teenage years”) because there was a White nationalist bookstore in her neighborhood and because of the murder of one Black person — Stephen Lawrence who has since been elevated to sainthood by the same activists and media that have systematically ignored or downplayed victimization of native Brits by non-White immigrants; see Tobias Langdon, “Black Saints, White Demons: The Martyr-cult of Stephen Lawrence”).

The Guardian piece centers around one Barry Mehler, who has been a longtime anti-race realism activist as head of the Institute for the Study of Academic Racism,” a non-profit housed on the campus of a state-supported university, Ferris State in Michigan.

I’ve long been aware of Mehler, being a target of some his writing. Mehler was the protégé of Jerry Hirsch, a behavior geneticist who devoted much of his professional life to campaigning against sociobiology and against quantitative behavior genetics, especially as applied to humans. Hirsch has a cameo role in Chapter 2 of The Culture of Critique, so you know what I think of ethnic activists like Hirsch and Mehler.

Indeed, Mehler is Faculty Advisor to Jewish Students at Ferris State University, a good indication that he has a strong Jewish identity. Saini’s article also shows his Jewish identification as informing his crusading against race science: Mehler “immediately saw parallels between the far-right network of intellectuals and the rapid, devastating way in which eugenics research had been used in Nazi Germany, terrifying him with the possibility that the brutal atrocities of the past could happen once more.”

Also indicative of his ethnic activism, Mehler has long been associated with the ADL. A 1995 article on the ADL website describes Mehler as the ADL National Commissioner. Another describes him as the chairman of the ADL’s Latin American Committee working to combat the confiscation of Jewish property and forced exile of Jews by the Sandinista government because of Jewish support for the previous government and because of Jewish support for Israel.

Not much doubt that Mehler is a Jewish academic ethnic activist, an activist ensconced at a state-supported university—the height of establishment respectability.

Once again, we see the confluence of Jewish identity and academic activism aimed at furthering Jewish interests, in this case by someone with no training in evolutionary biology or genetics. Despite the clear ethnic and political motivations characteristic of both Mehler and Saini, Saini has the gall to claim that race science is “innately political,” thereby absolving the activism of people like Mehler and Saini from any taint of extra-scientific interests.

The article names the usual suspects — e.g., Richard Lynn, Richard Herrnstein, Charles Murray, and Jared Taylor, but also some who are less widely known today, such as Roger Pearson, founder of the Journal of Indo-European Studies, the Journal of Social, Political and Economic Studies and Mankind Quarterly.

Here I want to focus on another important figure who is less well-known today: Prof. Ralph Scott. This is what Saini’s article says about Scott:

In May 1988, Mehler and [another activist, Keith] Hurt published an article in the Nation, a progressive US weekly, about a professor of educational psychology at the University of Northern Iowa called Ralph Scott. Their report claimed that Scott had used funds provided by a wealthy segregationist under a pseudonym in 1976 and 1977 to organise a national anti-busing campaign (busing was a means of desegregating schools by transporting children from one area to another). Yet in 1985 the Reagan administration appointed Scott to the chair of the Iowa Advisory Committee to the US Commission on Civil Rights, a body tasked with enforcing antidiscrimination legislation. Even after taking up his influential post, Scott was writing for Pearson’s journal.

Mehler’s 1988 article on Scott can be accessed here. Scott informs me that Saini presented him with quotes from some of Mehler’s writing on Scott, asking for comments. However, she ceased contact after Scott related his allegations about Mehler and in particular that Mehler had repeatedly refused to debate him on the issue of busing.

TOO has previously published two articles dealing with Scott. Nelson Rosit’s “Assault on Psychology: Research on Race Differences Anathematized” (2017). Rosit’s article also deals with other dissidents from racial orthodoxy, including Arthur Jensen, J. Philippe Rushton, and Raymond Cattell, all of whom have been targets of Mehler’s activism. Cattell was one of the most influential psychologists of the twentieth century, with major contributions in personality psychology as well as experimental design and analysis. At the hands of Mehler’s activism, these accomplishments, which were influential in the rise of scientific psychology, counted for nothing, and Mehler targeted him after he was nominated for a lifetime achievement award by the American Psychological Association. (Cattell eventually withdrew from the nomination and died soon thereafter.)

ORDER IT NOW

Cattell’s fall from grace was the result of being a thoroughgoing evolutionist, accepting not only the science behind eugenics (which is based on individual differences, not race differences), but also viewing the improvement of human potential as a good in itself. His secular religion of Beyondism, published late in his career, is a logical consequence of this perspective, proposing that evolutionary competition should be allowed to happen such that only the leading civilizations would survive.

Although Cattell never published scientific papers on race differences per se, this combination of accepting eugenics and natural selection between civilizations was enough to provoke Mehler’s ire, and his activism included the usual guilt by association drivel. It’s no surprise that the SPLC posted a 1999 Mehler article on Cattell, Lynn, Glayde Whitney, et al. with a section titled “Race, IQ and the death camps” that cites Richard Lewontin and Ruth Benedict (two villains discussed in Chapter 2 of The Culture of Critique. Mehler was also cited favorably by the SPLC in its portrait of Cattell; this article mentioned that Mehler’s colleague, Abe Foxman, head of the ADL at the time, wrote a letter to the APA opposing Cattell’s Lifetime Achievement Award.

So the portrait of a Jewish academic ethnic activist is complete: head of a non-profit housed at a state-funded university, with close ties to the SPLC and ADL, able to publish in elite left-leaning media like The Nation, characterized by a strong ethnic identity and working for Jewish activist organizations. And Mehler, having stated his concern that eugenics leads to a holocaust for Jews, clearly sees his activism as advancing Jewish interests. As has been typical of Jewish intellectual activists, in such an enterprise, the truth about race, intelligence, school busing and everything else he touches on has no importance whatever.

I penned an article,Prof. Ralph Scott on the Costs of Not Mentioning Race Differences,” based on a 2013 article Scott wrote for Mankind Quarterly. These articles make it clear that Dr. Scott was much impressed by the research of Arthur Jensen, the father of research on race and IQ, who, amazingly, is unmentioned in Saini’s article. Scott’s Mankind Quarterly article is essentially a tribute to Jensen, but also describes the dismal history of the attempt to raise the academic achievement Black children. Prof. Scott was vilified to a large extent because he opposed busing of Black children to largely White schools as ineffectual in rectifying the racial gap — a view that has been resoundingly confirmed by all the research. But the correctness of his views had no influence on the haters.

What’s striking from the perspective 2019 is that someone like Prof. Scott could have become a respected public figure during the 1970s and 1980s, for example becoming Iowa chair of the US Commission on Civil Rights during the Reagan administration, testifying before the U.S. Senate on educational issues, and actively participating in educational interventions in Iowa. As Rosit notes,

In the early 1970s Prof. Scott was involved in designing Home Start, a birth-to-kindergarten enrichment program for poor families in Waterloo, Iowa. Such early intervention was one of Jensen’s recommendations. Although Scott’s program was well received, the problems began when he advocated early intervention as an alternative to forced busing. In 1976 he organized a series of symposia entitled, “Constructive Alternatives to Forced Busing.” That is really all it took. To support Jensen’s findings and oppose massive busing could only mean one was a hateful bigot. The news media in several cities where the symposia were held alleged Scott had racist affiliations. Reporters, including Grace Lichtenstein of the New York Times, called administrators at Scott’s university to complain about his activities. This led to an investigation to see if there were grounds for dismissal.

Fortunately, Prof Scott’s tenure prevented termination.

While the university could not rid itself of Scott, leftist students and “colleagues” could make his life unpleasant. He and his family received threating messages including death threats. Follow professors denigrated Scott to their students, resulting in decreased enrollment in his classes. The university reduced his teaching assignments. The harassment and opprobrium lasted for decades until Scott’s retirement in 2014.

In 1988 Scott’s teaching and research came under scrutiny of the baleful eye of leftist academic activist Barry Mehler. Mehler, who received his undergraduate degree from Yeshiva University, is the Jewish director of the so-called Institute for the Study of Academic Racism (ISAR) at Ferris State University in Michigan. As part of his investigation Mehler had an assistant use a pseudonym to make calls to Scott posing as a reporter seeking an interview for the Baltimore Sun.

All’s fair in love and war, and it’s quite clear that clearly this is war. As Rosit notes, Scott was harassed throughout the remainder of his career. Scott’s Mankind Quarterly article describes the general picture:

For years, hitherto supportive White and Black students sought to drop my courses, having been informed in classrooms that I am a “racist” and consider Blacks “inferior.” In citing my “racism,” one lecturing professor reported that a New York NAACP organization advised him to monitor my classes. Asked about this, the professor threatened to sue me for infringing on his academic rights. Given parameters of customary academic freedom, I brought the issue to the university graduate council, composed of friends and colleagues opting to accede, however reluctantly, to academic constraints; my concerns were summarily dismissed. During council discussion, one professor asked, “Is it any worse for someone to be called a racist for antibusing views than reporting that busing is harmful to Black children?” … Day and night, my family members received threatening calls at home and office; university police scanned anonymous death threats; the dean of the College of Education warned, “You could get shot.”

I have been corresponding with Prof. Scott and he has allowed me to see some of the extensive paper trail extending from the 1970s to his retirement at the age of 86 in 2014. One thing is quite clear. Dr. Scott never backed down from a battle. The entire history is littered with court proceedings and complaints to government agencies and various offices of the University of Northern Iowa.

ORDER IT NOW

The fact that Scott was appointed Iowa chair of the US Commission on Civil Rights (USCCR) in the 1980s says a lot. Even more remarkably, the lead council for the USCCR, John C. Eastman (now a professor of law at Chapman University), with the cooperation of the head of the USCCR, Clarence M. Pendleton (a Black conservative), wrote a letter published in the Des Moines Register (dated March 4, 1988) that supported Dr. Scott against charges the paper had published alleging that Scott “stands against much of what the civil rights movement stands for.” Eastman wrote that the charges amounted to the claim that Scott had “vigorously opposed race-based forced busing, and has therefore earned the ire of those who favor race-conscious remedies and who consider themselves monopoly landlords of civil rights policy.” Eastman’s letter goes on to state that “many leading academics, politicians, and even some civil rights leaders have raised objections to busing on the basis of race.” Not surprisingly, the letter caused a maelstrom of controversy, with both Eastman and Pendleton being heavily criticized.

The attacks were relentless, spanning over 40 years. Way back in 1974 Dr. Scott was being called a “Nazi” and someone with “extreme dislike for blacks, Jews, and nuns” by other faculty. But these statements were not in his presence. He also received harassing phone calls and was terminated as a consultant to the federally funded Head Start program despite being involved in the design of the program.

Face-to-face hostility can be even more difficult to endure. As with others who have become academic pariahs, Dr. Scott’s face-to-face world included a number of hostile encounters. Articles appeared attacking him for his views in the Des Moines Register, a local newspaper read by many in the campus community. A very painful example occurred in 1982 at a faculty women’s lunch when the wife of a dean refused to sit at a table with Scott’s wife, claiming she would not sit with “the wife of a racist.” The harassing phone calls continued.

Speaking from personal experience and that of others subjected to such accusations, this type of social ostracism is typically more devastating to women than men and often has very negative repercussions on marriages. One can only imagine the devastating impact such an incident would have on his wife and on their marriage. Such incidents are often the most painful experiences of the entire process. But the people who revel in politically motivated harassment are clearly proud of their actions. They are the real haters.

These attacks are devastating to White people because they are framed as moral failings, not intellectual failings. We all want to have a reputation as upholding the moral standards of the wider culture, but it’s particularly important for northwest Europeans—a major issue in my forthcoming book. As a result, it’s especially difficult to be seen as a moral pariah in one’s face-to-face community.

So one can imagine the distress Prof. Scott felt when being called as a witness in an Iowa court on an issue involving possible termination of a school administrator. The opposing attorney claimed that Scott’s testimony was useless because of my “character problems” associated his opposing. The fact that in Scott’s scholarly opinion, busing consigned large numbers of Black children to harmful practices (e.g., much less involvement with the school by students and parents) and did nothing to advance their academic achievement meant nothing.

Another incident, also from 1982, says much about the academic environment at the University of Northern Iowa. A Black woman, Dr. Patricia J. Edwards, head of the university’s Culture House, had made the mistake of co-teaching a course with Dr. Scott. Administrators who are not also faculty members do not have tenure, and for simply co-teaching the course with Dr. Scott she was vilified and harassed because of Scott’s views that forced busing is counter-productive—an empirical question that should be settled by research, not fiat. She eventually resigned her position at the university rather than be fired. Any association with Dr. Scott — whether by marriage or co-teaching a course — was grounds for stigmatizing and, in, in Dr. Edwards’ case, loss of livelihood.

It’s quite clear that nothing happened to those harassing Dr. Scott or his associates. Indeed, they likely prospered in a university environment where virtue signaling on issues of race is practically a prerequisite for upward mobility. All this occurred despite the usual university pronouncements against harassment, hostile educational environments, and promoting “safe spaces” to prevent people from having their feelings hurt. Pleas to the FBI to investigate went unanswered. Harassment, hostility, hurt feelings, and tensions within one’s marriage are quite acceptable if the recipient is someone like Dr. Scott.

Dr. Scott retired from his full-time, tenured position in 2009 as part of a settlement with the university and the Iowa Civil Rights Commission of an age-discrimination complaint and retaliation because he had filed previous complaints. The settlement noted that his treatment was much more likely due to his ideas, not his age—hardly reassuring.

Dr. Scott’s last controversies occurred because the university was under contractual obligation to continue to offer him the opportunity to teach part-time in his specialty of human development after his retirement. The final events unfolded in the Fall semester of 2014 when a Black student stood up in class and angrily denounced Scott, claiming he had violated her “civil rights.” At first nothing happened, but then Scott realized that he was no longer scheduled to teach the course in the Spring semester even though he had been listed as the teacher for the course. He was told that the reason for this action was not the result of student concern but because of a need for budget cuts.

The university did nothing to redress the situation, so Scott filed several claims in small claims court for the salary he would have received—his fifth such claim since 2012. No documents were ever presented showing that the university had not allowed him to teach the course because of budget cuts, and the judge acknowledged that he was qualified to teach the course. However, Dr. Scott lost the cases, despite the judge in one case acknowledging that it was highly probable (400-to-1 probability based on his qualifications compared to other part-time teachers) that the document specifying the rights of emeritus faculty had been violated.

ORDER IT NOW

Moreover, the judge in another claim ruled against Scott despite the court’s recording system having broken down so that it was impossible for either Scott or the respondent to hear the proceedings. Scott complained that this was a clear violation of Iowa law and was referred for redress to the Iowa Board of Regents (the board that runs Iowa’s university system). Their reply was truly Orwellian: They refused to do anything to rectify the situation but restated their firm support for academic freedom. Dr. Scott concluded his reply to the Regents by writing that “as a World War II veteran I must add that events which transpired in the matters I now bring to the Board of Regents are reminiscent of what I witnessed under ‘Soviet justice’ in the 1940s.”

The forces of censorship and moral preening had achieved their final victory.

Ironically, Scott’s position on busing is now identical to what some liberals and the NAACP have been saying for years. Right now Joe Biden is coming under attack from the left for his history of opposition to race-based busing, a history that may well cost him in his bid for the Democratic presidential nomination. Scott’s recent letter to the Iowa Board of Regents (March 24, 2019) refers to a 2015 article, “School Busing Does Not Work. And to Say So Is Not Racist.” by Ted Van Dyk, a staunch liberal and author of Heroes, Hacks and Fools (University of Washington Press, 2007). Van Dyk notes that the main concern for parents opposing busing was the well-being of their children:

This was the case even in liberal Washington, D.C. My wife and I had two sons enrolled in a Northwest Washington elementary school when busing began in the city. School buses would deliver black kids from Southwest D.C. at the Janney School front door at the morning bell. The same buses picked up the same kids, immediately at the end of classes, and took them back to Southwest. They did not participate in any pre- or after-school activity. No black parents took a bus or drove from Southwest to attend evening PTA meetings or to otherwise participate in school-related activity. The quality of classroom instruction fell off markedly. Fourth- and fifth-grade neighborhood students, for instance, were repeating material learned in earlier grades because teachers found their bused classmates had not yet received it. Not surprisingly, parents from the neighborhood began looking for private schools for their kids or moved to Maryland or Virginia suburbs—not because of racism but because their neighborhood school no longer was working.

Van Dyk makes the very telling comment on the contemporary racial situation: it’s more about registering grievance than helping Blacks:

The emphasis now is not on[initiatives to improve the education of Black children] but on real and imagined grievances against a “white establishment,” denunciations of local police, focus on race-based violence (which has diminished markedly in recent years), and on the labeling as “racist” anyone not buying completely into the current politically correct talking line.

And so it is with the entire panoply of issues related to race, gender, immigration, and multiculturalism. Questions that should be decided by scientific studies (Does race-based busing really help Black students? Does race-based busing harm White students?) are instead settled by leftist ideologues and dissenters are punished. All in the name of being on the side of propping up a grotesque, Orwellian morality.

Throughout his career Prof. Ralph Scott has stood for the pursuit of truth in his research and for integrity in his recommendations on public policy. He deserves a prominent place in the pantheon of brave souls who stood up to the imposition of a short-sighted, politically motivated, leftist orthodoxy in the social sciences.

Notes

[1] Interestingly, she seems quite proud of her genetic heritage, given the title of another of her books, Geek Nation: How Indian Science Is Taking Over the World), but the book actually paints a rather bleak picture of Indian science as mainly staffed by conformist, uninventive drones and light years behind the West and Japan.

(Republished from The Occidental Observer by permission of author or representative)
 
Hide 156 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. Rational says:

    ANCIENT INDIAN TEXTS PROCLAIM WHITE RACE AS SUPERIOR.

    Thanks for the article, Sir. This Indian lady, Angela Saini, is running a scam on the public. It is possible that the Judaists wrote the book for her and are using the goyim to fool the goyim. Because she claimed in her book that race is a modern notion.

    In fact, it is quite ancient, and the Indian texts glorify white race and denigrate darker skin. In the Rig veda (~ 500 BC), the darker Dravidians are referred to as “dasus”, “anasa” (flat nosed) and swarthy skin, while the Gods, such as God Indra (Thor), God of Thunder, is described as blonde.

    Eg. “Indra protected in battle the Aryan worshipper, he subdued the lawless for Manu, he conquered the black skin.” [Rigveda, Book 1, Indra 130.8 (I.CXXX.8)]

    Here are more such quotes:

    http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread1185279/pg1

    In the uni, the Indian students despised the American blacks, and would not associate with them, would not invite them to the party to which they invited all the white classmates, and call white women who associated with blacks as “rundi” (whore) and south Indians as “dravidian dogs”.

    Do not be fooled, people.

  2. Another powerful and persuasive article by Kevin MacDonald. Well done, sir.

    • Replies: @mark green
    , @Wally
  3. Rational says:
    @Rational

    ONE MORE LINK:

    Eg. “At the swift draught the Soma-drinker waxed in might, the Iron One with yellow beard and yellow hair. He, Lord of Tawny Coursers, Lord of fleet-foot Mares, will bear his Bay Steeds safely over all distress.” Indra – 10.96.8 (Indra = Thor, god of thnnder).

    For more such quotes, see:

    http://nikarevleshy.blogspot.com/2012/06/white-knowledge-of-vedas-aryans.html

    This is actually a good way to argue with liberals. Say something negative against Indians, and they will say that you are a “racist”. And then state some of the above quotes. This gets the liberals totally confused and disoriented and their whole narrative that they have been brainwashed with collapses inside their head.

  4. David C. says:

    Thank you for the excellent article on Dr. Ralph Scott. I was one of his graduate students in school psychology and knew him as a brave and principled man. He was the reason I pursued the field of school psychology. I was not aware of the harassment he faced before and after I was his student, so thank you for shedding light on the horrible manner in which he was treated.

  5. @mark green

    I wonder how many studies (if any) have been done that measure the impact of bussing and racial integration (involving blacks) on white students.

    I’m sure that any impartial examination would discover that the influence of black students on formerly white schools and white culture to be, on balance, negative vis-a-vis the white students. This was certainly the case was when my high school became integrated decades ago. I was there. I lived through it. Black mayhem ensued. Black dysfunction took its toll.

    Among white children, blacks are often disruptive and intimidating. They are also, in many instances, toxic role models. Blacks are highly rebellious and they also tend to be low achievers in the classroom.

    Blacks, I suspect, also commit the vast majority of interracial assaults and episodes of interracial bullying.

    Perhaps the diversity wizards in charge of expanding tolerance and goodwill will someday turn their angry gaze towards the non-black victims of the African personality syndrome.

  6. Nothing like a good scientific discussion that starts out with various unrelated associations and ends with,

    “So the portrait of a Jewish academic ethnic activist is complete . . .”

    I take it you are now going to address the issues at hand. And despite a legnthy address, there’s not there regarding the research and busing — reads like a bait and switch. instead of a dialogue about why busing is inherently a poor measure of correction, it’s a long series of tales about academic drama. . . .

    The matter is very simple, historically blacks were barred from educational facilities controlled by whites period, that regardless of how qualified they might have been. So it has been life on easy street. Well, blacks got in. And are challenging the narratives and the data. I thought the article was going to address the data sets and arguments as opposed to a history lesson in academic politics which plays out everyday since there were colleges. The level of petty turf wars and battles about research validity and intentions is not anything new.
    ————————————————————-
    “We all want to have a reputation as upholding the moral standards . . . it’s particularly important for northwest Europeans . . .”

    Laughing. I am curious about this attempt channel out a unique space for westerners. I had no idea that were more moral attenuated than other Europeans. I am unsure which westerners you here. Irish, Welsh, Scotts . . . Germans, French, Spaniards . . .

    Further unsure how one teases out which westerners from the amalgamum of europeans in the US. But what is being tragically revealed is that whites making claims about moral high ground and unique claims to particulars are having a PR crisis.

    Whether it is:

    the financial crisis
    pay to play politics
    political coup detat’s
    pay to play academic entrance
    discredited use of crime stats to make overgeneralized claims — i.e. Ferguson effects
    white city councils literally financing their citizens on the backs of a particular population
    importing illegal immigrants to replace certain populations
    on its face the Epstien matter doesn’t bode well for particular qualities of white integrity

    I was looking forward to a discussion about the research and even I am embarrassed that instead the treatment is about how a white professor is having to defend himself for defending a process that is built on color segregation. Because that is the initial complaint and that segregation as it has been constructed around education was not less than equal and that said segregation was the tool by which could hide and protect the system they built not on academic ability but soley on color.

    Excuse me, but that is a serious hit to one’s credibility. I am unclear about the valuations of busing in tacking segregation, it seems to have been a failure — but that is just how it seems. Here’s what we know, the US built an education system deliberate unequal and worse designed to maintain blacks out of the system as citizens in violation of the constitution. That system was deliberate an intentional and did not involve testing the academic ability of blacks for entrance into the system of education but relied almost entirely on skin color.

    Before arguing about the western particulars of valuing integrity and honesty, one might want to at least mention that the educational system built around color lacked integrity on all four corners. And that system represented other peculiar ‘short changing’ or gaming of the system to benefit whites: employment, investment, housing . . . legal management, insurance, etc. and then used the findings of the dishonest construction to justify the dishonesty —-

    But I am certainly open to hearing the case the professor makes about busing and why it doesn’t work in improving the education efficacy of black learning even if that was but one of its potential goals. Well, that is if we want to be honest about it.

    I think integrity and honesty is important as well – regardless of citizen’s skin color eastern, northern, southern, or western.

  7. Ohhhhh . . .

    I confess Angela Saini is very attractive. Caught me off guard. Though I suspect my observation would be considered “Metoo” offensive.

    Liberals have taken the fun out of everything.

  8. Every time someone says there is no such thing as race ask them “So you oppose affirmative action?”

    • Replies: @Bookish1
  9. @mark green

    FBI crime statistics for the last 50 years back you up 100%.

    …Hmm, I wonder how has busing has helped Nationwide Education Scores in major cities?

    DeVos Admits Latest Nationwide Education Scores Are So Bad They’re ‘Devastating’ – Calls for More of What She’s Been DoingPublished on October 30, 2019 at 12:20 PM ET

    https://www.thenewcivilrightsmovement.com/2019/10/devos-admits-latest-nationwide-education-scores-are-so-bad-theyre-devastating-calls-for-more-of-what-shes-been-doing/

  10. This article is humdrum history. It fails to address basic issues and dynamics that could be used to understand the enemy and successfully fight them.

    For example, it’s obvious that non-white situational ethics are pre-Christian, rhetorical, and non-analytical. Those ethics are based on an attack-response feedback loop, which has been taught to them by the left. The left deliberately peddles a revisionist history and distorted narrative about who attacked, who was attacked, and when the attack was initiated. The narrative allows non-whites to run to the Nanny State whining “white boy hit me first”. The State not only gives them permission to retaliate, but also says that white boy has always been this way and will ALWAYS be this way, so they’re allowed to hit back whenever and however they want.

    Reason and logic won’t cut through the narrative. It’s contrived out of feelings and kneejerk reactions. The only effect is for non-whites to double-down. The rules of the game have been changed while white boy wasn’t looking, so now he’s just playing endless defense. How many times and in how many ways does it have to be said? The only way out of this quagmire is direct force initiated against both the left and their non-white proxies. Every effective tactic must be used: traps, incitement, feints, psychological warfare, scorched-earth, whatever. It’s an existential war, but so far only one side has shown up to fight.

    • Agree: Dannyboy
  11. She has a Sissie husband unable to make fire in kitchen.

  12. @EliteCommInc.

    Racism is pattern recognition, as in science; racism is realism, as in truth.
    You’re entitled to your pseudo-moral fantasies, but don’t force them on me.
    To make a long story short: Segregation is the only moral solution.

    Back to you, chuck-0.

  13. Willem says:

    Synopsis: Blablablabla written by someone from the Ministry of love.

    Reason: to obfuscate that race, like culture, is equal to class

  14. Anon[515] • Disclaimer says:
    @EliteCommInc.

    I went to school with blacks.

    If you want to understand what it’s like Boomer I suggest you go to Amren.

    Segregation must have been like this heavenly Utopia of peace, quiet, and non violence and non rape and non drugs and non retardation. For blacks and whites.

    They can’t do it man. They just can’t do it. They cannot possibly do it.

    Blacks are like earthing to educational electricity transmission.

    They destroy, totally, wherever they congregate. Even Blacks don’t want to go to black schools. But they’re going to have to.

    Did you miss the statement from Ted Van Dyk? He exactly addresses the issues. Bussing doesn’t freaking work. It doesn’t work. KIPP Schools do. But days rayciss.

    Blacks need their own Wakanda and their own schools where they can use their own thriving unique culture to transmit knowledge.

    This Mr Scott is a hero like Mr Williamson.

    And one day, God willing, these liberals and their pets will be segregated or removed from the retaken USA or the second Republic.

    Boomers were wrong. We don’t have to listen to these commie liars. We just have to defeat them and destroy them. Whites should fly until there is nowhere left to go and then see what happens.

    Your comment is an embarrassing morass of non sequiturs and obliviousness and non comprehension.

    White kids should be 500 miles from a black school.

    They’re just pure carnage, boomer. And its your fault for your stupidity.

    And Epstein was a Jew, arranging for children to get raped on behalf of Israel and Mossad and international Jewry. He wasn’t white, any more then Jacob Rothschild is white. Or Ehud Barack who turned up at his mansion to join in the fun as head of mossad is or was white.

    Every item in your stupid irrelevant list is Jews. Suspicious.

    How dare you dismiss the experience of younger generations.

    How God must hate Boomers.

    • Replies: @anarchyst
  15. please quit with the race mongering. last time this happened, half the world was consumed by inferno of war. we can’t afford this in the age of nukes.

    Acts 17

    26 And hath made of one blood all nations of men for to dwell on all the face of the earth, and hath determined the times before appointed, and the bounds of their habitation;

    27 That they should seek the Lord, if haply they might feel after Him, and find Him, though He be not far from every one of us:

    28 For in Him we live, and move, and have our being; as certain also of your own poets have said, For we are also His offspring.

  16. @EliteCommInc.

    I am unclear about the valuations of busing in tacking segregation, it seems to have been a failure — but that is just how it seems. Here’s what we know, the US built an education system deliberate unequal

    It’s pathetic that this is the most coherent part of your long winded and semi-illiterate comment. You have a very disordered mind and functionally illiterate grasp of syntax, spelling, and grammar.

    You’re better served by making FAR shorter comments as “Tiny Duck” or another of your sock puppet pseudonyms.

  17. GMC says:
    @mark green

    I can tell you what happened at two all white schools in Chicago when the ” Integration” started. Both schools – Ebinger Grammar School on the far North side was a perfect example of education in the 40s 50s and 60s,70s.Good teachers w/ parental backing, huge playground with basketball and baseball areas { always a game going on} and a respected institution sending their 8th graders to Taft HS, Lane Tech HS and others. Taft HS was the only all white HS in the city and we played sports all over Chicago – no school busses – we used the CTA most times, or drove ourselves. And we played all black schools – No Problems except when standing , waiting for the bus. Once bussing started , the Grammar school had so many attacks on the neighborhood school kids , mostly girls { my nieces incl} – 75% of the parents pulled their children out and found private schools or when to the suburbs. The new principal at Ebinger would not administer any discipline to the bussed in gang. When the busses showed up to bring the inner city kids back home – their was barely a trickle of neighborhood school kids – heading home. At Taft , the white kids formed a KKK – and what was a once great neighborhood school – became a fight club. Now – who pushed this Agenda to destroy good schools ? I’m betting the same that lobbied to change the Immigration Laws in 65. Thanks Unz Rev and Mr Green

  18. Alfred says:

    “Indian-Punjabi household”

    It seems her father is Sikh and her mother Hindu.

    …she hints at some kind of family rift, relating to race. Her Hindu mother, Santosh Gupta, married a man of a different ‘caste, religion, and community,’ Sohan Saini, in Redbridge in Essex in 1979.

    [Eternal Recurrence, Quarterly Review, June 24, 2019]

    Race Denier Angela Saini’s Paranoid Personality Disorder (VDARE.com)

    It seems that she has ample racial conflicts in her upbringing. I guess that denial of reality comes with the pitch. I also note how fair-skinned she is for an Indian. There are no people who are more racist than the Indians IMHO.

    • Agree: theMann
  19. Barry Mehler, who has been a longtime anti-race realism activist as head of the Institute for the Study of Academic Racism,” a non-profit housed on the campus of a state-supported university, Ferris State in Michigan.

    As other HBD Mitten commenters can further attest, there is something notable about this.

    Ferris State is widely known as THE “fuck up university” here in Michigan. It’s the university for kids with a solid C average and poor SAT scores. It’s Michigan’s “party school” and is taken seriously by absolutely nobody. That it’s reputation is worse than EMU, WMU, or even Lake Superior State in Marquette has to be a tough pill to swallow for a Jewish ethnic activist. How embarrassing and even humiliating to append his name with “Professor, Ferris State” when meeting anyone with the least bit of knowledge of Michigan higher education.

    Ferris is located in Big Rapids which has probably a 99% White demographic outside Ferris faculty and students and I’d guess 90% White overall. There are more Amish in the immediate area than there are negroes.

    So here’s Mehler, far far away from the negro hordes (closest population is in nearby prisons or Muskegon, next would be Grand Rapids), and working for the academic equivalent of a special ed class. A Jew with a massive inferiority complex relative both to his tribal cousins and to every professor at all the real universities in the State, insulated from the harm his neurotic tantrums are causing. The guy is a third rate intellectual and academic hack at best.

    • LOL: fnn
  20. anarchyst says:
    @mark green

    I grew up during the first “civil rights” era and observed firsthand what the “civil rights (for some)” movement has wrought.

    I lived in a decent Detroit neighborhood that began to “change”. At first, there was “no problem” with the few black families that moved in. However, things got progressively worse. If you had a nice bike, you had to be aware of two blacks riding on one bike.
    The black riding the handlebars would jump off, knock you off your bike and take it. Quite often they only lived a block or two away. The stolen bike would be visible. Calling the cops was futile as they would say “possession is nine-tenths of the law”. The kids and their PARENTS would actually DARE the white parents to “come and take it back” (if you can).

    Advance to a number of years to when I was on my own. .I was always a Detroit supporter . . .

    I still subscribed to the (mistaken) notion that most blacks were decent people, had decent black neighbors, was friendly with them, helped them when needed and generally had pleasant neighborly relations with them.

    I had an old car that I fixed up to near showroom condition. I used to park it in my driveway to work on it or wash or wax it.

    My neighbor’s relatives came to visit. Two of the “teenagers” saw my car in the driveway and proceeded to sit on the hood, scratching the paint. My request for them to get off was met with f— you. Upon talking to my “nice” neighbors, their response was that “boys will be boys” and to “let it go”. Although I remained pleasant to my “neighbors”, things were never the same. After a rash of break-ins and vandalism, a number of them by the same “teenagers”, I finally gave up on Detroit and all close friendship with blacks.

    Improving “race relations” was always a “one-way street”–whites giving up freedom of association and the right to live with our own kind and restrictive real estate agreements (covenants) while seeing blacks and their criminal behavior destroy everything they touch.

    • Replies: @Sick of Orcs
  21. anarchyst says:
    @mark green

    It was just as bad in the 1960s. In fact, Detroit’s Northeastern High School had a “black students union” that was successful in getting the American flag removed from the front of the school and replacing it with a “black nationalist” flag.

    The ordeal that us white students had to go through was harrowing, to say the least. White students did not use the restrooms, as a “beatdown” by multiple blacks was usually the result. Blacks never fought one-on-one, the “pack mentality” was evident then as is today.

    Blacks did not want to learn, the same situation that still exists today. Teachers were deferential to blacks, although there were a few teachers who tried to carefully shield their white and asian students from predatory blacks, giving them additional attention and coursework, knowing that they could excel in spite of the, violent, raucous atmosphere.

    Anywhere blacks go, they destroy…

    • Agree: Jim bob Lassiter
    • Replies: @Truth3
  22. @Rational

    The ancient Indian texts also portrayed the gods as blue, orange and black. Does that mean they support a multiracial elite like the one present in 1984?

    • LOL: Truth
  23. @EliteCommInc.

    (In)saini being a pretty street pooper is 90% why anyone pretends to listen to her.

    • Replies: @Stan d Mute
  24. Thank you for this article, Mr. MacDonald. Your book The Culture of Critique definitely made a seismic shift in my perception.

  25. KA says:

    “Their report claimed that Scott had used funds provided by a wealthy segregationist under a pseudonym in 1976 and 1977 to organise a national anti-busing campaign (busing was a means of desegregating schools by ”

    Reports of Obama , Bush Cheney , Clinton ( Mr and Mrs) , Trump and both parties ‘s senators and congress representatives have taken enormous amount of money from rabid zionists and Israeli supporters and have organized anti Arab and anti Iran campaigns for decades have been known for years . At least the trend should have been noted . But the report despite rich in abundance have been conspicuous by its absence in American mind . Thanks to the gate keeping by media and Evangelical bouncers .

  26. @anarchyst

    Thank you for excellent posts. Stories like yours redpill faster than black crime stats.

  27. KA says:

    “DL National Commissioner. Another describes him as the chairman of the ADL’s Latin American Committee working to combat the confiscation of Jewish property and forced exile of Jews by the Sandinista government because of Jewish support for the previous government and because of Jewish support for Israel.”

    Doesn’t the Israeli government do that? Has it been not doing it in Palestine , Golam and in southern Lebanon for years ? Didn’t Friedman justify attack on Oraq because Saddam was supporting Palestinian resistance ?

  28. gotmituns says:

    Interesting coming from an Indian. Gandhi had some interesting thoughts on blacks/kaffirs and he didn’t like Jews much either.

  29. Both the frequency and the efficiency of the ongoing, highly visible false flag/psyop events prove them to be statistically non random events.

    Believing nothing as ‘true and accurate’ is where these invasive(s) have lead us.

  30. @Sick of Orcs

    (In)saini being a pretty street pooper is 90% why anyone pretends to listen to her.

    It’s hard to have anything but open contempt for a person who comes from a place where over 600,000,000 people shit on the street yesterday and yet chooses to criticize OUR society. And what sort is it that rather than fixing the place your ancestors shat on for eons, you leave the shitty mess and decamp for more sanitary lands? Go home and build toilets you bitch!

    • Agree: Alfred, Saggy
  31. Forced Busing is absurd.
    Back in the 70’s as a child, my family and I embraced the concept, only to eventually learn Diversity is Overrated.
    Busing caused Demographic Shift, the wonderful predominantly white neighborhood of my youth, a mix of Italian etc, is less diverse today, now predominantly black.
    I have visited my old neighborhood, unsafe and local law enforcement curious as to my presence/ “ suspicious person?”,thanks in part to Yellow Bus.

  32. fnn says:

    Pleas to the FBI to investigate went unanswered.

    No doubt the FBI has been thoroughly pozzed for many years. The Ruby Ridge and Waco atrocities seem to indicate that. Here’s a recent article about other examples of FBI misbehavior:
    http://jimbovard.com/blog/2019/12/16/richard-jewell-and-the-illusion-of-the-fbis-power-and-competence/

  33. DanFromCT says:

    The nazification of Americans by Jews goes back to Arthur Miller’s Focus, a novel wallowing in Jewish persecution as rationale for preying on and hating non-Jews. This book damning Christians in America, including even children, for all being Nazis under the skin was written in 1942 when caskets of American Christians were coming home by the boatload. Jews? They were conspicuously the least likely group to have put on the uniform to defend America or their own kin in Europe.

    Instead of answering such racist smears integrated into every aspect of the kosher msm, Hollywood, and TV by sending them packing, Conservatism Inc and the Republicans apologize to the rapists and condemn the victims. To paraphrase Mao, when Jews fart in their faces, the members of Congress say “I’m sorry.” When angered by a question about Jewish power in America, Richard Perle replied that Jews own all but about 5 of the 535 seats in Congress. Proof? Instead of making Natanyahu’s repudiation of endemic anti-American hate in Israel a prerequisite for continued $billions, Congress gives the bastard 29 standing ovations behind the President’s back, QED.

    • Agree: Sick of Orcs
  34. The Indians of the sub-continent scurry to serve the Jew the moment they land here. Look at Nutty Nikki Hailey, she even apes the Jewish habit of changing names.

    Indians are the biggest ‘racists’ on the planet. Their whole shit covered society is a war of all (family, village, caste) against all (other family, village or cast). The only people who think Indians make great immigrants are Jews and Indians. Everybody else see’s them for what they are: opportunistic and slippery.

    • Replies: @Just passing through
  35. @mark green

    “Among white children, blacks are often disruptive and intimidating. They are also, in many instances, toxic role models. Blacks are highly rebellious and they also tend to be low achievers in the classroom.”

    As negroes have been deified in our culture, white adolescents also tend to adopt their atrocious command of English, their slovenly style of dress, their primate inspired mannerisms, and in general a poor attitude towards any kind of structured environment.

    So yeah, even just a few negro children can drag a whole lot more white children down to their level when the negroes have the zeitgeist on their side. Addressing the NQ is a critical component in any serious course correction for the US.

  36. @anno nimus

    Matt. 10:14And if anyone will not welcome you or heed your words, shake the dust off your feet when you leave that home or town.

    15Truly I tell you, it will be more bearable for Sodom and Gomorrah on the day of judgment than for that town.…

    So long, Jews.

    Matt. 10:34Do not assume that I have come to bring peace to the earth; I have not come to bring peace, but a sword.

    35For I have come to turn ‘A man against his father, a daughter against her mother, a daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law.

    36A man’s enemies will be the members of his own household.’…

    We have nothing in common with you, black people.

    The Bible is a wonderful thing.

  37. @Stan d Mute

    Noble Hindus also expected widows to burn alive in their husband’s funeral pyre.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sati_(practice)

  38. annamaria says:

    The lack of moral fiber in Barry Mehler:

    Mehler has long been associated with the ADL. A 1995 article on the ADL website describes Mehler as the ADL National Commissioner. Another describes him as the chairman of the ADL’s Latin American Committee…

    Barry Mehler is a proud representative of this:
    1. The ADL was established to defend the Jewish rapist and murderer Leo Frank: https://www.unz.com/runz/american-pravda-the-adl-in-american-society/
    and this
    2. The ADL has been supporting Ukrainian neo-Nazis: https://portside.org/2014-11-20/how-israel-lobby-protected-ukrainian-neo-nazis

    Ferris State university should be avoided by intelligent students: https://www.ferris.edu/HTMLS/administration/president/DiversityOffice/newsletters/Fall09Issue1.pdf

    A question for Barry Mehler:
    Does Mehler support the apartheid theocratic Jewish State and its racist policies?
    https://www.ferris.edu/arts-sciences/profiles/humanities/barry-mehler.html

  39. Bookish1 says:
    @Hang All Text Drivers

    That won’t mean anything to a liberal. They will simply answer no and go on their way without even thinking about the contradiction. You cant win over liberals with an argument. It takes a change of the power structure that supports them.

  40. @Stan d Mute

    Kind of funny how they are the highest earning ethnic group in America.

    It is not YOUR society, you literally have to pay money to live in it without being harassed by agencies like the IRS and FBI.

    Whites are about to be disposessed, I’ve seen plenty of Whites shitting on the streets in SF because they can’t afford the huge increase in housing, wouldn’t be laughing it up there too much, wouldn’t be surprised if you are shutting on the streets in a few years time, then we can talk about YOUR society.

  41. Saggy says: • Website

    What is it like to teach math in a black school? This article may seem like a parody… but … it isn’t ..
    A White Teacher Speaks Out …
    https://www.amren.com/news/2016/08/a-white-teacher-speaks-out/

  42. anarchyst says:
    @Anon

    As singer Billy Joel once stated: “We didn’t start the fire”.
    It wasn’t “boomers” who formulated and imposed the so-called “civil-rights (for some)”, “affirmative action” and unrestricted third-world immigration laws and statutes on us. Us “boomers” were forced to live under these laws that were imposed on us by those of “the greatest generation”. Us boomers did not know any better, these laws being put in place while we were still relatively young.
    Some of us boomers protested against these laws, but were “pushed back” by federal and state governments utilizing federal troops.
    Having come of age during the turbulent sixties, I witnessed for myself the underhanded dealings used to push “civil-rights” on us law-abiding whites.
    It was the JEWS…It’s ALWAYS the JEWS. Almost every “civil-rights worker” was a left-wing JEW.
    During the first so-called “civil-rights” movement, we used to have a saying: “Behind every Negro, there is a Jew”. It was no secret that Jews were behind the “civil-rights” movement of the 1950s and 1960s.
    From personal experiences, blacks were not the “non-violent” types who only wanted “equality”, but were always violent racists who demanded that “whitey” acquiesce to their “wants and needs”, quite often taking by force (stealing) what they felt should have been theirs.
    Growing up in 1950s Detroit (which was still a livable city), us whites had to be wary of blacks. Black criminality was quite often ignored by “the powers that be”, the “excuses” being the “racism” and “discrimination” that blacks lived under. This was all orchestrated by the jew civil-rights “experts” attempting to impose a massive guilt trip on us whites. Of course,our protests against integration were drowned out by the jews and the mainstream media of the time, which demonized us whites, even back then. Us whites retreated into our shells, being careful not to offend the jews and their “pets”–blacks, but in the backs of our minds, we knew, even then that the whole “civil-rights” movement was a major factor in the destruction of our society.
    Civil-rights policies initiated in the 1970s didn’t help, either. The imposition of “affirmative action”, forced busing of school students, and the outlawing of aptitude tests for employment assured that substandard, unqualified blacks would be pushed into the workforce. Of course, large corporations could easily absorb the incompetence by hiring qualified whites to mentor unqualified blacks, but what about small businesses?
    Even liberal whites are seeing that this whole “civil-rights” deal is a massive scam perpetrated on whites.

    • Replies: @MikeatMikedotMike
  43. @anno nimus

    “…and hath determined the times before appointed, and the bounds of their habitation…”

    “determined…the bounds of their habitation” means SEGREGATION, not integration as you naively believe. If you believe that God created the races, then you must also believe that it is a sin to try to destroy them by miscegenation, which is the ultimate result of integration. In other words, be a good Christian and therefore be a racist.

  44. @anno nimus

    Ah, it’s inevitable, a leftist useful idiot disguised as a Christian, who misuses the Bible as a cherry-picking expedition for out-of-context quotes. But you don’t represent Christianity. You’re part of a churchian heresy that treats Christ as a lackey of the Almighty State worshiping the Great Goddess of Equality. It’s a cult of feelings and niceness that ignores God’s judgment. It reacts like a 16-year-old high school girl to superficial personality traits. It pours saccharine love over evil like syrup over poison in order to be “welcoming”, “diverse”, “multicultural”, “non-judgmental”. Objective good and evil are meaningless, every sexual perversion is accepted, God’s Love never includes Judgment, the sinner is never responsible for her sin, and everybody gets into some feelzgood version of heaven. Your churches are an effeminate, emasculated caricature of Christianity that must be exorcised from top to bottom before the Truth of the Logos can ever again be witnessed.

    Regarding your coy reference to Hitler, you people are clueless. Let me help you out a little. It’s perverse that one of the so-called lessons of WWII was to demonize nationalism, just because “Hitler” etc. It’s a faulty conclusion based on a false premise, yet another postmodern inversion of the truth. Hitler tried to conquer England, Europe, the Mideast, North Africa, and Russia, leaving most of the rest to Japan. Most Germanic peoples in Europe had already been consolidated PRIOR to Hitler’s invasion of other countries. There was no reason for invasion except that Hitler tried to force his ideology on everyone else.

    Since Hitler tried to conquer half the globe, how does that imply any sense of nationalism? True nationalists by definition respect borders. A culturally, ethnically distinct nation not only stays within its own borders, but expects other nations to respect the same. The only possible conclusion is that Hitler was a virulent form of globalist. He was never a nationalist, and anyone who tries to peddle the opposite is a devious liar. Hitler was a creature of the globohomo left, not the right. The left owns Hitler, and their noses should be rubbed in it good and hard.

    • Replies: @fnn
    , @Bookish1
    , @Kratoklastes
  45. ANZ says:

    campaigning against the idea that Whites are a real group—a group with interests and a long, proud history.

    I suspect that “whites” are a relatively new metagroup invention. A group marked by their European origin and a relatively high adherence to enlightenment values. The idea of white identity in history was probably not needed often, since strong national or ethnic/tribal was ubiquitous. Maybe the forerunner of white identity was the rallying around Christianity to defend against Muslim invasions. In the absence of a threat to Europe as a whole, the need for such white identity was not necessary?

    Now in the U.S., the need for developing a white identity becomes a real pressure. In this ethnic and religiously Balkanized nation, alliances and coalitions are important for forming a power block strong enough to protect its common interest. Herein lies the power and appeal of white identity. It can unite historically separate European groups to achieve current necessary goals opposed to the tsunami of non-European immigration.

    But I don’t see a unitary long proud history of whiteness as such. If it existed, it would have essentially been pan-Europeanism. I could be ignorant.

    There are two things I would like input on from the UNZ community.

    1. How is white identity to be defined? Skin tone is not enough. Are we referring to the the embrace of enlightenment ideals? Are we referring to blood and soil. A combination of both? It needs to be clearly defined to have power.

    2. How far back is “white” identity discussed as such? What are the seminal published works on this topic?

    I do believe that rallying to white identity is critical to preserving what is left of the founding ethos of the U.S. and possibly restoring some of what has been lost. It could be useful in the increasingly homogenized E.U. as well. I want more clarity on the issue at hand.

    • Replies: @Just passing through
  46. @steinbergfeldwitzcohen

    WASPs and Jews worked together to asset strip and loot the sub-continent, now Indians and Jews are working together to loot WASP countries? Talk about irony.

    One day your job will be taken by an H1B, and then you will be kicked out onto the streets by your bank and end up like the following

    • Replies: @denk
  47. @anno nimus

    This time it will be Whites that are completely wiped out, the Colored Races now possess nukes and will defintely use them in the event of a racial civil war in the West, hell even Russia might get involved as it would mean taking out their enemies.

    I hope the likes of Kevin MacDonald continue to raise the temperature, the non-Western nations are rubbing their hands as we speak. It is going to be brutal for Whites.

  48. “Segregation is the only moral solution.”

    This is entirely nonresponsive to my comments.

    On your side issue of segregation — no issues, as I have stated repeatedly — but as established, all public related services in any way linked to government support — must b e equal in all ways.

    So on the issue of busing as presented, I was expecting a discussion about how and why busing fails black students. I have my own views on this, but the article jumped over the issue it introduces. So in response, I noted what issues have most damaged the country and on record, those issues have been advanced or created by whites. As example, ok, blacks and whites should be separate. But for the country’s well being, it would have been wise to educate as many blacks freed as possible in every way as were whites — even in seperated communities. Instead we as a nation opted to not only deny education, but engaged in policies to keep new citizens thoroughly outside the system in which they lived and then proceeded to complain about supposed dysfunction —

    So, after 100 plus years, I have little doubt that thirty years of busing would solve a system’s indemic malfunctions in place for more than 200 years of socialization. Laugh. Even in open shared societies, the impact of change requires up to five generations. In parents didn’t complete HS, but three of their children managed to get through college. So, sure it’s almost a no hurdle research to see the short comings of a busing programs which has not been in effect for forty years, in actually didn’t get implemented until some time after in any real mass capacity and even then — very resistance – even if justified would matter.

    But that is the discussion that would have been interesting. Admittedly have an unfair system in fact one designed to prevent advance, busing is an issue, so since the government aided and abetted in the violation of due process – we don’t dispute that — a discussion of redress more effective than busing —-

    Your assumption about my motive is hereby dismissed as totally incorrect. I have no knee-jerk, opposition to segregation.

    • Replies: @anarchyst
  49. @ANZ

    1. How is white identity to be defined? Skin tone is not enough. Are we referring to the the embrace of enlightenment ideals? Are we referring to blood and soil. A combination of both? It needs to be clearly defined to have power.

    Crudely speaking, I am guessing most White Nationalists just use the skin tone and phenotype to tell if a person is White or not, this does mean a lot of Southern Italians are excluded. If we are going to talk about “achievements”, then “White” = Western European as the following heatmap of scientific accomplishments from Charles Murray shows

    View post on imgur.com

    2. How far back is “white” identity discussed as such? What are the seminal published works on this topic?

    The concept of “White” is probably very old, but it really only started to gain traction in the second half of the 20th century when the era of mass non-European immigration began. Before that there was a lot of discussion of the various groups within Europe, the Nordic, the Alpines and the Mediterraneans. Nordics were regarded by the WASPs who were dominant in America as the best, Madison Grant wrote a book called “The Passing of the Great Race” in which he outlined his worries of the Nordics in America being swamped by the inferior Alpines and Meds.

    The truth is that in the case of America, it will be difficult to pin down an idea of White, pick any random White person in America and he/she may be descended from Anglos who spilled their blood at Concord or Lexington or they might be desceded from Ellis Island immigrants who walked into a booming society.

    • Replies: @ANZ
  50. “Blacks are like earthing to educational electricity transmission.”

    I went to school in the DOD system . . . and that in different parts of the country. And blacks were as whites, save this, less tolerance for blacks than whites for similar accusations. Ohhh, wait, the segragations were more in line with:

    jocks, nerds, theater, music, “hippy types” (associated with drugs – how true remains unknown to me), rotc groupies, teachers faves, student council . . . etc.

    and some blacks would sell out other blacks in the same way that some whites seek out whites, save the selling was about color for access and goodies, not unlike today I guess. Laugh. In my view, blacks that support immigration, selling out their own citizens in league with whites, but with consequences far more damaging to blacks in my view.

    But all in all generally, color far less an issue, save underneath it all. Mostly, fond memories – but the blacks I knew — color always eventually would be manifest. Nothing as open as in public systems outside DOD.

    ———————————————–

    “You have a very disordered mind and functionally illiterate grasp of syntax, spelling, and grammar.”

    Laugh. No doubt, I should spend time proof reading. But it might be a good idea for you to avoid responding to that which you don’t comprehend for any reason.

    • Replies: @Anon
  51. “What a screed of bullshit.”

    It has been my understanding that only blacks stooped to such language as it is crass, lowbrow, uncouth and lacking any intellectual verve.

    • Replies: @Milesglorious
  52. Anon[515] • Disclaimer says:
    @EliteCommInc.

    Okay boomer.

    Also, be silent boomer.

    No one cares about your obsolete opinions or platitudes or anecdotes.

    Here is a rule. If you’re a boomer, be quiet about race.

    You sound so retarded. There is not theatre today. They’re literally pimping out your 12 year old daughter. There is no music that isn’t basketball American crime music, and they will stab you for no reason.

    They will shoot you and kill you for no reason except walking on they block.

    Be quiet you delusional ingrate boomer.

    There is no student council. There is no set of teachers faves, unless they’re the nogs getting their dick sucked by the brain washed 24 year old trainee teacher they giving crack to.

    Schools today are simultaneously crime precincts and prisons.

    Spare everyone your thoughts about blacks in theatre. It’s cringe Worthy. It doesn’t exist today, Boomer.

    • Replies: @MikeatMikedotMike
  53. annamaria says:

    Globalists/zionists’ gift to France: https://www.fort-russ.com/2019/12/major-report-reveals-dozens-of-former-french-soldiers-joined-terrorist-groups-in-middle-east/

    Le Figaro published excerpts from the forthcoming report by the Center for the Analysis of Terrorism, a Paris-based think tank. The report said the French Army “constitutes a strategic recruitment target for terrorist groups… and former soldiers represent tremendous assets for these groups”.

    The report, “Soldiers and Jihad”, profiles 23 ex-servicemen “identified within terrorist organizations [mainly Daesh] or implicated in plotting terrorist attacks”. … Several former Legionnaires have been arrested over terrorist plots in France, and ex-paratroopers or commandos have become leaders of Daesh combat units in Syria or Iraq.

  54. Agent76 says:

    Jul 28, 2019 “United States” to Imperial America: Our Hidden Empire

    The global expanse of US military bases is well-known; but it’s actual territorial empire is largely hidden. The true map of America is not taught in our schools.

  55. Truth3 says:

    It’s a War. The Tribe and all they can recruit, against the Christian Europeans that built this country, and civilized the barbaric world.

    The sooner White Christians of European descent see this, the better.

    When the weapons move from words to fists, knives, guns, AFV’s, and Nuclear Weapons, it will be too late to get ready.

  56. Truth3 says:

    Kevin McDonald is an absolute treasure.

    Nobody clarifies and distills like he does.

  57. Truth3 says:
    @anarchyst

    Lots of Truth.

    Never met a black kid that would start a fight unless at least three other black buddies were within 30 feet.

    Never met a black kid that would speak ghetto-talk unless he was with his buddies…. then it was all he could say.

    Never met a black kid that was half as smart as the 90th %-ile white kid. Never. Ever. Sorry if that offends, but it’s the truth.

  58. lavoisier says: • Website
    @EliteCommInc.

    I didn’t know clueless liberals without any real life experience with the dangers and dysfunctions of black people read the Unz Review.

    Isn’t that what The Atlantic and The New York Times is for today?

    The talented tenth exists for sure, but at approximately 10 percent of the population.

    The untalented bottom 50% of the Bell Curve are a nightmare.

  59. fnn says:
    @Monotonous Languor

    Actually, the Poles of Aug. 1939 thought they were a big deal, a real world power. There were numerous Polish provocations of Germany in the period leading up to the war. Without going into details, there must have been some reason why there were 70,000 ethnic German refugees from Poland in Germany and Danzig at the time of the outbreak of the war.

    The retired General speaks on this topic (and others related) and he had to be careful given that he was speaking in Germany:

  60. @EliteCommInc.

    Michelle Obama was recently in the news again targeting white people. She talked about “white-flight” from cities and communities as blacks move in, which then creates a decline in the overall community financially: meaning as the whites move out, the blacks who moved in see their livelihoods decline, the neighborhoods go into dis-repair, etc.

    Here’s my Question to YOU:

    Why is it that you folks cannot stand on your own two feet once the whites leave? I think you are looking at this in the wrong way. It should not be Why your people are “oppressed” by whites or by whites self-segregating hurts you, but WHY you want to continue to BLAME whites for your own inability to make your communities work? Once the white flight happens why can’t the Black folks just pick up the pieces and CREATE their own community with their own hand print on everything?

    Really, you have the upper hand now, more so than whites. If you decide to build a shoe factory, for example, you can literally get away with hiring an all black work force. Why don’t you? Where is your creativity?

    It’s time that Blacks take responsibility for their own destiny. With “equality” and “privilege” (which I would say there is a lot of black privilege these days) YOU don’t need the whites to provide for you anymore.

    Throughout history their has been periods of great migrations. Why aren’t the black people moving out of the USA? Instead, millions want to come here from all over Africa. Once here, are they really able to take care of themselves?

    • Agree: Alfred
  61. Harbinger says:

    Angela Saini is not British and never will be. Again, the Goebbels ‘great lie’ comes into context here. People in the UK, for the last 60+ years have been told they’re British because they have either lived here for ‘x’ amount of years or they’re born there. Neither makes you British unless you have common ancestry and racial continuity. Sure, she speaks English and? There are more Chinese in this world who speak English than actual English people but they’re certainly not English/British.

    It’s just laughable that people in the UK listen to and read these fools, people not of their nation who educate them on it. This sums up modern society.

    • Replies: @Phil_from_NJ
  62. @anarchyst

    “As singer Billy Joel once stated: “We didn’t start the fire”.”

    Ironic, as Billy himself is an ethnic Jew who used song to convey his natural Jewish obsession about deflowering confirmation aged Catholic shiksas in Only the Good Die Young.

    He was ultimately successful, as most of them are, in impregnating some of the highest Western Euro stock available in the form of Christie (Hudson) Brinkley, to produce the ghastly creature seen below on the right. The Jew gene is like the crabgrass of the womb. Compare to her gentile half sister:

    We Didn’t Start the Fire” is a hilariously apt bit of irony considering the ethnic Jewish trait that is Lack of Self Awareness.

    • Agree: Fuerchtegott
    • LOL: Truth3
    • Replies: @Truth3
    , @Truth
  63. @mark green

    American ‘pop culture’ is now essentially comprised of black dysfunction and this is exported to the rest of the world thanks to technology.

  64. @EliteCommInc.

    That system was deliberate an intentional and did not involve testing the academic ability of blacks for entrance into the system of education but relied almost entirely on skin color.

    You are starting from a false premise. I suggest that if a general study on bussing was done, it would show kids spending an hour on a bus going to a public school, irrespective of race, would not fare as well as those walking 20 minutes.
    People segregate naturally. Catholic schools generally have a higher academic performance than public schools. Boys schools and girls schools generally have higher academic performance than Catholic schools. Dunbar High School in Washington DC performed better than some “White” Schools in the DC area.
    Many years ago I heard Dr. Fraser Mustard, an expert in early childhood education, speak at a health conference. He wasn’t keen on fancy electronic toys which were becoming the rage, because they “trained” kids, rather than kids discovering for themselves, like hearing the different noises made by hitting a wooden spoon on different pots, pans and lids. Hard wiring begins early. He did, however touch on potential “class” and “race” issues – nutrition. Kids needed proper nutrition, with a lot of protein, to develop neurologically. Unless that was done pre-school, no amount of school intervention, like breakfast programs, or extra academic help was going to make up for the deficit in hard wiring. These kids, regardless of race, were more likely to be involved in crime, other than white collar crime, in their late teen years. Poverty, from his perspective was part of the problem. The Henry Ford “pay them enough to buy what I’m selling” economic system has been replaced with a “crush the peons” economic system, where cheap labor is paramount, whether done through de-regulation of employment standards, mass immigration, free trade, or offshoring jobs. All of that leads to poverty for more people, which means poorer nutrition. Poor nutrition, of course, also leads to poorer health outcomes.

  65. anonymous[191] • Disclaimer says:
    @EliteCommInc.

    She is an extreme exception to the rule, the vast majority of Sikh females look like this:

    https://www.browngirlmagazine.com/2018/11/cut-hair-sikh/

    • Replies: @annamaria
  66. @EliteCommInc.

    You maybe right,but it is accurate.

  67. Truth3 says:
    @MikeatMikedotMike

    … hilariously apt bit of irony considering the ethnic Jewish trait that is Lack of Self Awareness.

    Jews are constantly in a self denying straight jacket.

    Simple facts… Jewish beauty?… or better stated… lack thereof.

    Jewish women are ugly as sin… and the men are worse by a fair margin… yet they attempt all manner of disregard of this stunningly obvious fact. Nose jobs? Mainly for Jews. Why? Self-evident…

    Big noses for Jews, small noses for non-Jews, and the frequent appearance of rhinoplasty “as an instrument of (attempted) Americanization” all appear in Jewish literature as showing “the special significance attached to the nose as a factor marking the otherness of Jews – historically, in print, on stage, and on the screen,” writes Goldblatt.

    Then…

    Bernice Schrank notes that Jewish attitudes toward the Jewish nose has changed from negative in the 1950s to positive today. “The change from unacceptability to acceptability is based on an increasingly successful challenge to the American myth of melting pot sameness by the politics of ethnic difference.”

    • Replies: @Mark Hunter
    , @Curmudgeon
  68. ssohara says:

    Ms. Saini is really pretty.

    My parents came to the US from India. They learned the language and tried to assimilate. They obeyed the law, worked hard, etc. My Mom voted for Trump in the last election. I’m more libertarian than anything.

    So, I believe in the right of free association. That means I’m against forced busing. If the issue was that black schools had less resources – have bake sales and raise money for those schools.

    When people are not forced to hang out with each other, they can often get along quite well. But no one should be forced.

    BTW, India is a multicultural country. They are really prejudiced against blacks there. But if you are white, Latino or Asian, no problems.

    Recently India under Modi issued new immigration rules – they will allow Hindus, Christians, Buddhists, etc., fleeing persecution from Pakistan, Afghanistan and Bangladesh into the country but no Muslims. So of course some Muslims are now rioting because this is discriminatory.

    But it’s not. Muslim-majority countries persecute all non-Muslims. India is trying to provide a safe place for these persecuted people. They are allowing all religions except Muslims.

    I have no issues with individual Muslims but it’s groups of them that can be a problem.

    As far as Indian immigrants to the West – please don’t come here unless you’re willing to assimilate and appreciate the culture. Western people have the right to be proud of their countries and cultures. I have traveled in Austria, Hungary and the Czech Republic recently and I loved learning about their history and culture. Of course it is a white history. These are European nations.

    Hungarians are very proud of their unique history and culture. And they should be. I am proud of my Indian heritage. I don’t want the world turned into some homogeneous mush. I like that people continue to have different cultures.

    When I was in high school we had an Indian culture club. It was open to anyone who wanted to come, whites, blacks, etc., but it was focused on Indian culture. I would have been fine with a German culture club or an Italian one or a French… why not? Near where I live there is a German society. They have a German Christmas market every year and they teach classes in German and about German culture. Good for them.

    It is just as racist to be anti-white people as anti-brown or black or whatever people.

  69. Truth3 says:
    @ssohara

    I have no issues with individual Muslims but it’s groups of them that can be a problem.

    Imagine a white person saying the same about Jews or Blacks.

  70. Republic says:

    Dr Dutton of the Jolly Heretic had a review of Saini’s book.

    Superior by Angela Saini. A video review

    You tube censored it.

    Here is it on bitchute :

    https://www.bitchute.com/video/GM6hKWxMe2ZR/

    • Replies: @geokat62
  71. @ssohara

    Somehow the necessary mutuality of those freedoms, like the one of association, is always missing and instead comes some claim of allegance.

  72. geokat62 says:
    @Republic

    Here is it on bitchute

    Top comment from vaughan:

    There would never be an argument that there is no such thing as an Indian from an Indian. But…anything that serves to invalidate the idea of a white European? The deep racial shame that compels such people is a terrible thing. Here we have a woman speaking and writing in the language of my people, not hers. Choosing to live in the ancestral lands of my people, not hers. Surrounding herself with a world her people have no connection to, and have played no part in creating. How to resolve all this? There is no such thing as white people. Only problem is, every single time she looks in the mirror she knows she is not white.

    • Agree: Republic
    • LOL: Alfred
  73. anarchyst says:
    @EliteCommInc.

    YOU are perpetuating the myth that blacks need to sit next to whites in order to learn.

    THAT was the false premise of busing. Blacks were (and still are) too stupid to realize that any type of “affirmative action” is actually an insult and an affront to black “success”–for the few blacks who possess enough white DNA in order to rise above the mean.

    Blacks STILL want more “programs” and tax dollars as it is never enough.

    In order to “prove” your premise that “discrimination” is responsible for black failure, lets take your “pets”, (inner-city blacks) and place them in the schools where wealthy whites send their children.

    See how those who formulate the laws in this country that affect mostly middle-class whites like it.

    The white middle-class has been used in racial experimentation and the results are always the same-whites get “dragged down” to near-levels of dysfunctional blacks.

    Despite the experimentation, whites, even in adverse racial circumstances ALWAYS do better than blacks.

    The common refrain is: “if only more money were spent, we blacks could achieve”. In actuality, flushing money down the toilet would achieve the same results.

  74. annamaria says:
    @anonymous

    Saini is a profiteering shill: https://www.theguardian.com/science/2018/aug/11/women-equal-to-men-science-fact-book-angela-saini

    Angela Saini counters long-held beliefs that biology stands in the way of parity between the sexes.

    … the idea that there are factors within us that will cause men or women to be better at some things than others. …actually, science doesn’t support that point of view. I think it’s important we understand these scientific facts. We need that ammunition to counter the weird mistruths (?!) that are circulating within and outside science about sex difference.

    She is truly an idiot and a militantly ignorant one. Take note that she demands to “understand” the facts — otherwise, people can be confused by the facts? The weasel is taking on the role of a politically correct interpreter. Never mind the unbiased scientific approach. What a stain on the university she studies in.

    “She has a Masters in Engineering from Oxford University, and a second Masters in Science and Security from the Department of War Studies at King’s College London.” The same Department of War Studies at King’s College London has been promoting Elliot Higgins known as Bellincrap.

  75. Shabby goyim, like their mind-controlling masters, always say “race isn’t real, but racism is real.”

    • Agree: geokat62
  76. Harbinger says:

    What’s somewhat ironic here, is that it is the non whites, in the white lands who are, many unknowingly, the true racists and haters of white people and their culture.
    Every one, who comes into Europe, not of European ancestry, culture and racial bloodline is inherently promoting racism, which most of them are utterly incapable of understanding.
    I’ll explain:

    Firstly, everyone not of European culture, ancestry and bloodline, cannot become part of European ancestry, culture and bloodline and it doesn’t matter if they stay here 2 months, 2 years, 20 years or 200 years. You cannot be part of something that you are not of. Of course, E Michael Jones would disagree with you, believing that if you’re black, can speak Polish and are a practising Catholic then you are, but that’s another story.

    Secondly, because you cannot be that explained in the above, trying to connect to something that is not yours and your peoples, it therefore means you will ultimately practice your own culture. In doing so, there will most certainly be conflict created between your culture and that of the host. Therefore, you, as a minority will seek to enforce your freedoms to live by your culture, regardless what the host people think. This in itself shows your utter lack of respect and thus blatant hatred of the values, traditions and ethics of the peoples whose land you’ve now, essentially invaded.

    Thirdly, as more of your people, come from foreign lands to the white lands of the west, you will populate. As you populate you will continue to push for more of your culture to be accepted, again, regardless of the conflict that will ultimately be created through clash of culture.

    As Geokat62 quotes Vaughan, who makes a very poignant comment, these immigrants are invaders, having hijacked our values, they could not find in their own lands, having hijacked our language and living in our civilisation, their ancestors played no part in its creation whatsoever.

    The ramblings of stupid, little girls like Angela Saini, clearly show their projection of what can only be described as a deep, seated hatred for white people. The reality is actually quite simple to understand? Why does she feel as she does? Why does she have such hatred? Well, I hate to have to state the obvious, but people tend to hate that in life which is superior to them. The fact that her parents had to move to a land, whose ancestors conquered theirs, in order to have a better life, clearly proves the overwhelming superiority of the western civilisation to anything India could ever muster. As Vaughan finishes his reply: “Only problem is, every single time she looks in the mirror she knows she is not white” will always say to her – you live in a land, not your, never will be yours, created by a people far superior in every way, shape and form to yours and regardless, how long you live here, you will never be of their nation. It’s anger, hatred and insane jealousy knowing that the only way you could ever defeat the peoples, clearly from a far superior civilisation, is to invade their land, as an immigrant to seek a better life and then playing upon their altruism that you could never find in your own land. In other words, when she looks into the mirror every morning and sees the brown face staring back, she knows that she and everyone else, not of the western peoples and their civilisation are full of blatant racism and hatred for a people they are insanely jealous of, for being something they never will be of.

    You can keep repeating the mantra that non whites can be European, but regardless, anyone with the slightest modicum of common sense knows this to be a lie. And those non Europeans know this too.

    • Replies: @geokat62
    , @Wally
    , @Bookish1
  77. Wally says:
    @mark green

    Indeed, MacDonald knows the score.

    He said:

    ” Saini’s article also shows his Jewish identification as informing his crusading against race science: Mehler “immediately saw parallels between the far-right network of intellectuals and the rapid, devastating way in which eugenics research had been used in Nazi Germany, terrifying him with the possibility that the brutal atrocities of the past could happen once more.”

    – It’s no surprise that the SPLC posted a 1999 Mehler article on Cattell, Lynn, Glayde Whitney, et al. with a section titled “Race, IQ and the death camps”

    – Once again, examples of how the fake & impossible “holocaust” narrative is put to use and why it was invented in the first place.
    – Nothing changes as long as Euro-whites allow real mass murder supporting liars / Zionists like Mehler to get away with their lies. Nothing.
    – All arguments with Jews and their leftist shills end up in the fake “death camps”.

    Only lies require censorship.

    • Replies: @annamaria
    , @Bookish1
  78. geokat62 says:
    @Harbinger

    As always, great comment, Harbinger.

    I always enjoy reading your thoughtful comments. Pleasure having you here at UR.

    Wishing you and yours a Merry Christmas and a Happy Nee Year!

    geokat62

    • Replies: @Harbinger
  79. Wally says:
    @mark green

    Not just in schools, but in every instance where blacks & browns are in great numbers, and / or control the governments of cities, counties, regions, states, countries, & continents we see:

    – massive murder rates
    – massive crime in general
    – degraded property
    – massive disease, especially STDs
    – massive drug & alcohol abuse
    – general filth, squalor
    – massive birthrates
    – inability / unwillingness to support their own children
    – massive youth pregnancies rates
    – massive school dropout rates
    – incredibly low IQs & test scores
    – violence as a way of life
    – fathers nowhere to be found

    • Agree: ANZ
  80. “You maybe right,but it is accurate.”

    Laugh.

    Just to be clear. I don’t think that only blacks use that language. Nor is it by definition a sign of low intelligence. However, given the nature of this discussion, it is in my view inappropriate and lacking any critical value — my despite my lackluster writing skills.

    There are plenty of blacks who would never use that language under any circumstance.

  81. Harbinger says:
    @geokat62

    And likewise to your good self geokat62. I hope you have a wonderful Christmas and New Year with your loved ones.

    While I’m at it, I would like to wish all at the UNZ review exactly the same.

    • Agree: NobodyKnowsImADog
  82. annamaria says:
    @Wally

    The picture from the Guardian is not tweaked like other Saini’s pictures. — With her prominent nose and an arrogant smirk she does look Jewish. https://www.theguardian.com/science/2018/aug/11/women-equal-to-men-science-fact-book-angela-saini

    • Replies: @Wally
    , @Alfred
  83. Anon[851] • Disclaimer says:

    The largest pro-busing advocates are coming from big city dwellers who are minority of some sort, and who really don’t want to be stuck in school with violent 80-point IQ ghetto blacks.

    If blacks weren’t crowded into America’s northern inner cities, there would be no attempt to bus students at all, and whites would still go to public school instead of private schools. Blacks and their low IQs and violent behavior spoil everything for everybody.

  84. I think of the South Florida neighborhood I grew up at, all my Jewish friends, swept away by black influx.

  85. martin_2 says:

    Surely when a non-white like this Indian woman starts having a go at Western society and white people any sensible white person will tune out since it is obviously just a case of someone pursuing their own ethnic interests. White people don’t need to address her “concerns” as if she is impartial and disinterested, she just wants her tribe to have all the power.

  86. Mark Hunter says: • Website
    @Truth3

    Perhpas you’re blinded by anti-semitism, and I say that as someone who gets called anti-semite every other day. There are all sorts of looks among jews. The Hollywood of yesteryear featured, off the top of my head: Claire Bloom, Cornel Wilde, Paul Newman, Hedy Lamarr, Piper Laurie, Marge Champion …

    • Replies: @Truth3
  87. Wally says:
    @annamaria

    She’s getting a free ride that she would never get in her India, and knows it.

    Hence the arrogant smirk.

  88. Bookish1 says:
    @Monotonous Languor

    Hitler did not try to conquer half the globe. You know nothing about that history. Enough said I’m not going to waste any more time.

  89. Wally says:
    @Harbinger

    Indeed, white South Africans born there who came to the US are not considered African-Americans.

    In fact, they are not considered African.

  90. @Rational

    Well! Even if Padma Laxmi is a “whore”, I would not kick her out of the bed… just saying!

  91. “YOU are perpetuating the myth that blacks need to sit next to whites in order to learn.

    THAT was the false premise of busing. Blacks were (and still are) too stupid to realize that any type of “affirmative action” is actually an insult and an affront to black “success”–for the few blacks who possess enough white DNA in order to rise above the mean.

    Blacks STILL want more “programs” . . .

    In order to “prove” your premise that “discrimination” is responsible for black failure, lets take your “pets”, (inner-city blacks) and place them in the schools where wealthy whites send their children.

    See how those who formulate the laws in this country that affect mostly middle-class whites like it.

    The white middle-class has been used in racial experimentation and the results are always the same-whites get “dragged down” to near-levels of dysfunctional blacks.

    Despite the experimentation, whites, even in adverse racial circumstances ALWAYS do better than blacks.

    The common refrain is: “if only more money were spent, we blacks could achieve”. In actuality, flushing money down the toilet would achieve the same results.”

    Laughing.

    I am unsure how to make this any clearer. I have no immediate rejection to segregation. I have never wavered from that position.

    You are projecting a premise I did not make – or even suggest. You have jumped a made up shark of your own imagination.

    No. Busing was not premised on sitting next to white kids. It was premised on the demonstrated reality that whites had created an unfair, biased system that was not in ant manner equal. In other the condition of “separate but equal” was separate but it was not equal. And that as the case north, south, east and west. I cannot unravel that lie for you. That is something you will have to grapple with on your own.

    The decision to bus was an attempt to provide equal access – which had been denied. that’s it — redress. Whether a single white attended classes or not the black population would have access to the same quality — or conditions that benefited whites. It would be a good idea to understand the constitutional issues in question. And sitting next to “big black bucks” frightening white school girls as Pres. Eisenhower put it was not the issue.

    ——————————————

    Note: If I were you I would avoid all issues regarding laws in relationship to blacks and by all means don’t slit your throat by discussing the use of law enforcement — Oy.

    ———————-

    “THAT was the false premise of busing. Blacks were (and still are) too stupid to realize that any type of “affirmative action” is actually an insult and an affront to black “success”–for the few blacks who possess enough white DNA in order to rise above the mean.”

    You know I always feel that in these discussions, I am taking advantage. That’s one reason, I keep telling myself to leave the advocacy for whiteness alone. I don’t think there is anything wrong being white. However, if one is not careful, it leaves one with a canyon’s empty knowledge on how the country operates and more importantly ignores what was standard history in the country regarding black white relations. But first,

    the notion that one needs “x” amount of white blood is bizarre. It’s as strange as the one drop rule. It’s also, have my cake and eat it too. You sound like white women, who claim they don’t want affirmative action, but have fought tooth and nail to gobble up as much as they can. You nor does anyone else have a clue of the percentages of white blood makes for academic achievement — news for you most white people don’t go to college. Don’t score above the average on IQ and no more innovative than blacks. And like blacks just want to work, feed their kids, and watch the game on Sunday – along with paying their bills. History doesn’t record any superior ethics: as my original comments makes — clear — whites have seriously damaged the US and have done so in every area. Just a couple of weeks ago, the whites in the fed were putting up 500 billion or more to bail white corporate buy back gambits. Not four months ago mostly whites — and we are talking wealthy successful whites were buying their kids into schools. Not that is new — but this was and is a rather shameless and brazen play on the old canard of legacy and donating a football helmet to get my kids into school.

    Enough of my blathering about what nonsense white blood is to some superior standard. The history of my fellow citizens of the dominant population is legions full of foul play. I won’t get into much as yanking that chain causes writers and editors apoplectic fits. But its to the cake and eating it to. In your argument lies a rather peculiar concept: to be successful and be black one must have “x” amount of white blood. You don’t know how much that it is, but clearly all successful blacks have white blood. It’s a circle the wagons kind of thinking. Such that circling the wagons means the natives are attacking — how does one know —

    “Well, don’t be daft — the wagons are circling.”

    Successful black. Must have white blood. — how does one know — because said black is successful.

    And the entire country has been operating on these kinds of logical tropes when it some to black relations — laugh — let me guess ‘add mixtures.’

    First, I don’t think discrimination is the singular cause for “black failure”. However, that doesn’t change the reality that state and federal governments participated and facilitated the same and did so across the board for many reasons, among them, the dominant public sentiment would have conniption fits at attempts to provide fair play.

    Second, absolutely blacks can be successes without being among whites. In fact, those schools that created their own communities, ie. Howard and others turned out success routinely

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historically_black_colleges_and_universities (I am not a huge fan of wikipedia but it’ll do here, in my view) as more and more blacks participate in ways they have not previously, there’s bound to an impact – losing exclusivity is painful for sure)

    — however, their success was to limit in the mainstream — because of skin color — I can’t solve that reality. And I have no idea how much white blood these individuals have:

    Oprah Winfrey

    Michael Jordan

    Mike Adenuga

    David Stewart

    Abdulsamad Rabiu

    Isabel dos Santos

    Robert F. Smith

    David Steward

    Here’s the reality. As more and more blacks make money, and I am playing a very shallow game here — because I know that in order to be successful, one doesn’t need to have a billion, a several hundred million, 1 million, several hundred thousand or ten thousand in store – but as they become increasingly successful they will by the very nature of those relationships with other blacks increase those numbers one drop of white blood or none. That is not the sole definition definition of success — not for whites, blacks, browns, or lavenders. But if you to ask Miss Winfrey and others how much white blood they have you are welcome to it. Life is hard. It’s just hard for people of any brand, that the US is responsible for making that arbitrarily so based on skin color — on such a mass scale — again I can’t solve that history for you. And as more and more blacks give each other a hand up as whites did — you’ll have what you have today, the consequences of a society whose identity was established on color. Yelling about blacks using identity of skin color is one one those blind alley arguments. Where the country turns a blind eye what its foundations were in an attempt to indict blacks – who are only playing the same game, so it is said. But as history would have it and as the articles posted by A.E. here on this sight — blacks are less color loyal than whites. There have been black populated riots and politics, but those instances were not because some white guy moved into the neighborhood or because some black who met the standard was promoted – affirmative action for blacks has routinely included upping the standard, not lowering it. That domain of lowered standards is really the domain of women entering the workspaces of labor traditionally held by men. And let’s face it, white women own the affirmative action they don’t want. Laugh. Few people want to talk about that reality — white womenhood must be protected at all times, regardless of how much damage they wreak on the system.

    “As long s those undeserving “darkies” without sufficient white blood don’t get it.

    Anyway, I should be resting I think I outdid my routine today.

    I think you will need to have this discussion with successful blacks. Hanging and reading what goes on in the echo chamber is great for encouragement, but it doesn’t do much for critical thinking. As for bad writing I used to have alist of famous and successful people who were notorious for bad writing. It’s comforting to know I am in good company.

    • Replies: @anarchyst
  92. Bookish1 says:
    @Harbinger

    What you say is true. A non white in america can never be an american because being an american is a culture of european descended people. However a nonwhite can be a citizen but an american never.

  93. Bookish1 says:
    @Wally

    Every concerned person should do a part in exposing the holocaust lie. When it is common knowledge that the holocaust didn’t happen the jews lose their most powerful defensive weapon. Then they are done.

    • Replies: @Wally
  94. If everyone doesn’t know by now that the jews , particularly the monied jews, are after nothing less than our blood, I really don’t know what to tell you. Other than, imagine that Christian whites were in population the size of, the same number as, Palestinians. Do you believe we would be treated any differently. In Israel Christians are spat on, assaulted and treated rather poorly. While worldwide when passing a church many jews spit on the ground and recite curses. If you don’t believe me do a little research into the history of Jewish Christian relations, and pay particular attention to their favored holiday Purim.

    • Agree: anarchyst
  95. The true purpose of ‘busing’ was not to improve the plight of blacks, just the opposite, it was to further racial integration between whites and blacks. Now, who benefits from that? Well, ask yourself: what nationality (if we can call it a nationality) prohibits inter-racial/faith marriage? Could this race of small hat wearing males, with the physical characteristics of the rat, could they perceive a benefit?

    • Agree: Dannyboy
  96. annamaria says:

    Why Ms. Saini has decided to study at the Department of War Studies, King’s College London?

    “The Department of War Studies seeks to understand the complex realm of war, conflict and international politics.” — Is this why the Department of War Studies, King’s College London has invited Elliot Higgins, whose training and expertise are restricted to finishing a grammar school and selling ladies underwear? The spectacular level of Higgins’ ignorance did not stop the ziocon Atlantic Council and the ziocon New Yorker from glorifying the “journalist” and “investigator”.

    This is what the pressituting New Yorker writes enthusiastically about Mr. Higgins who has zero (0) training in sciences and engineering:

    They had each paid around twenty-four hundred dollars to join a five-day workshop led by Eliot Higgins, the founder of the open-source investigation Web site Bellingcat. … the participants were employing the same techniques that have underlaid Bellingcat’s news-making investigations into subjects such as the downing of Malaysian Airlines Flight 17, over Ukraine, and the use of chemical weapons by the Syrian Army [the latter was finally debunked as the most cynical cover-up and false flag – https://thegrayzone.com/2019/11/18/whistleblower-opcw-suppressed-syria-chemical-weapons-evidence-after-us-pressure/%5D. ]

    Higgins started Bellingcat with a Kickstarter campaign, in 2014, but today almost half of its funding comes from these paid workshops, which he has been running since last spring, with the first in the U.S.—in Washington, D.C., New York, and San Francisco—planned for later this year. Higgins is also developing a partnership with the Human Rights Center at the University of California, Berkeley, School of Law, and hopes to hire enough staff to expand Bellingcat’s coverage into Latin America.

    The formerly decent “New Yorker” has been converted into a dirty harlot by Remnick (see Iraq war cheerleading) and his team of presstitutes. Take note that the Human Rights Center at the University of California, Berkeley, School of Law is totally content with Mr. Yoo, the main legal mind in creating the apology of torture and professor at the School of Law. There is no hope that these self-proclaimed fighters for the Human Rights would ever notice that the most prominent journalist of our times, Julian Assange, has been rotting in prison. Meanwhile, the profiteering propagandist and ignoramus Elliot Higgins has been lauded by the ziocon News Yorker and Atlantic Council of war profiteers and cherished by the Department of War Studies, King’s College London.

    “In 2018 Higgins was a visiting research associate at the Centre for Science and Security Studies (CSSS) at the Department of War Studies at King’s College London.” — This is the same Centre that has produced the well-connected Angela Saini. She certainly knows what company to keep. There should be zero expectations that this politically correct opportunist can ever write anything of value.

    • Replies: @Skeptikal
  97. Truth says:
    @MikeatMikedotMike

    Compare to her gentile half sister:

    You mean compare him to his gentile half brother (and father).

    And cut it out Rabbi Mordechai. Your attempts at covertness are as subtle as Maxwell Smart’s.

  98. Dr. X says:
    @EliteCommInc.

    She’d make a fine concubine for an officer on duty in the Raj, wouldn’t she?

    What a difference a century makes…

  99. Truth says:
    @ssohara

    So, I believe in the right of free association.

    Do you believe in your neighbors right to swift-kick your ass back to Punjabi?

  100. Truth says:
    @ssohara

    . I am proud of my Indian heritage. I don’t want the world turned into some homogeneous mush.

    You mean like, what you’ve done by moving to your hometown in the U.S.?

    • LOL: Talha
  101. Lets not forget idiotic psychiatrist that instituted laws that children must not be punished.
    That is one of the reasons Am children are not learning.

  102. @Monotonous Languor

    Hitler tried to conquer England, Europe, the Mideast, North Africa, and Russia, leaving most of the rest to Japan. Most Germanic peoples in Europe had already been consolidated PRIOR to Hitler’s invasion of other countries. There was no reason for invasion except that Hitler tried to force his ideology on everyone else

    .

    OK, so to this point you’ve made it clear that you studied the history of WWII in a US government school (if at all).

    You’re literally wrong on all counts, which at West Point would probably get you an A+ with oak leaf clusters.

    The Anschluß and everything from there to the invasion of Poland involved attempting to expand German territory into areas identified as having large ethnic-German populations: Austria had been left out of Bismarck’s reunification of Germany in 1871, and the large German-speaking population had been agitating for Anschluß ever since.

    The fact that Schussnigg wanted to rig the plebiscite (making Hitler lose patience and order the outright invasion) says more about Schussnigg’s desire for power, than any genuine opposition.

    As to whether the Anschluss qualifies as an ‘invasion’, it depends who you ask. Austrofascism wasn’t actually very popular, and when the Krauts arrived everyone basically tried to give them non-stop blowjobs.

    Imagine what would have happened if George Bush had ridden in an open car in Baghdad with 200,000 ‘victims’ in the crowd… well, Hitler did precisely that in Vienna, three days after the first German troops crossed the Austrian border.

    The Sudetenland: similar story – Bohemia, Moravia and parts of Silesia were historically Germanophone, and so the population was part of the planned ingathering of the German people into one heimat (it’s even mentioned in Mein Kampf).

    So Czechoslovakia was not invaded: it capitulated when it was clear that it had no backup from France or England (the Soviets had declared a willingness to come to their aid if Germany invaded, but the Czech government was not willing to risk a war unless it had guarantees from France and England).

    Ze Chermanz wound up needing to over-run the rest of Czechoslovakia, largely to form a defensive buffer because of Hungarian annexation of Ruthenia (86% Hungarian) and the Polish seizure of a chunk of northern Slovakia.

    OK so now we’re at March 1939. Hitler turned his full attention to the Free City of Danzig (also historically Germanophone) and the ill-treatment of ethnic Germans in Poland. His actual objective – what he was prepared to accept – was to build a new autobahn between East Prussia and Danzig: it would be a jointly-administered territory, and cam with a bunch of sweeteners (including a 25 year extension to the 1934 non-aggression pact).

    In late April, with talks going nowhere, Hitler annulled the non-aggression pact between Germany and Poland.

    What Hitler didn’t know is that in stark contrast to Austria and Czecheslovakia, the Polish government had an iron-clad commitment from France and England, to come to Poland’s aid in the event that the Germans invaded. (The English citizenry and Parliament were not informed of this guarantee, mind you: that’s not what democracy is about).

    So Poland was totally intransigent, and was simply not negotiating in good faith.

    After a few more months, Nasty Uncle Dolfie said “scheiß drauf” (or words to that effect) and invaded… and the French and English promptly declared war on Germany.

    From there, fuck-all happened for quite a while (the ‘Phony War’); from that point onwards anything that the German military did was part of a set of overlapping strategic and tactical plans.

    There was no intention by Hitler to ‘conquer the globe’: he had far too dim a view of non-Aryans to countenance having a shitload of untermenschen to babysit for a thousand years.

    • Replies: @Commentator Mike
  103. @ssohara

    When there’s enough of you and other Third Worlders then US and other Western countries will be just like India or any such other country, and inter-communal and inter-racial riots will result in thousands if not millions of deaths.

    In India and many other Third World countries they can’t even hold an election without thousands getting killed, candidates being assassinated, bombings of polling stations, mass beatings, and other assorted violence. And all of that just to elect a bunch of murderers, thieves and rapists into parliament. I say that if this were to happen in white countries, they’d ban elections outright and declare a state of emergency instead. See how you are? And if you like western ways so much (or what you perceive to be Western ways), law and order, safety and security, respectful civilised and non-violent behavior, wouldn’t the first thing to do be to introduce this in your own countries?

  104. “So the portrait of a Jewish academic ethnic activist is complete: head of a non-profit housed at a state-funded university, with close ties to the SPLC and ADL, able to publish in elite left-leaning media like The Nation, characterized by a strong ethnic identity and working for Jewish activist organizations. ”

    Your TAX DOLLARS are work, folks !

    Be happy that a big percentage of your work, work hours, your efforts, goes directly to people like that – and organizations like that.

  105. Anon[317] • Disclaimer says:

    In 1972 my student advisor at Brandeis in a course of a conversation mentioned that his parents were Polish and Russian Jews that immigrated to the states from Poland. He went on state that when he was growing up his parents and grandparents often would refer to Poles in the old country as naive, gullible and ignorant. That his folks recalled the old days in Poland when they were growing up they were encouraged to get the best of Poles by way of deceptions in trade and sales transactions at the markets. He leaned back in his chair and asked me if the Poles were that naive, gullible and ignorant as his folks made them out to be in the old country? I did not know what to make of this. That is what was his aim with this question? Was he trying to say that I was stupid, was it to humiliate me, to put me down for being a Pole or was I supposed to reply as to agree or not disagree with his folks characterization of Poles as being stupid. I side stepped the question and did not answer his question. I pretended that I did not hear his question. I was 18 years old and was more interested in getting an education and did not want to get on his bad side.
    Now 47 years forward I have come to the conclusion that the Jewish characterization of Poles as being stupid indeed but also would like to add that the Americans, the British, the French, the Germans, the Italians and all of Christianity etc as being stupid as well they have not seemed to learn from time immortal past experiences of repeatedly giving the Jews so many chances to live among them so as to become the Jews victims. What will it take for the Non-Jews to stop bashing their heads against the wall that they thinks that the Jews will change their evil parasite when they are permitted to live among them this one time?

  106. ‘She’d make a fine concubine for an officer on duty in the Raj, wouldn’t she?

    What a difference a century makes…”

    Uhhhh, I have no intention of venturing down that road. The opening photograph shows and attractive you lady — and regardless of my own issues with women and there are plenty —- and in private I whine as much as the next male about female irritants and irritations —

    However, the idea of any women relegated to the life of a concubine is a bridge too too far for me.

    Though clearly, the young lady and I part company politically, I have no doubt. But on record she appears to have a skill set(s) that simply make that option unreasoned and even less likely, I suspect.

    Note:

    My comment, ““As long s those undeserving “darkies” without sufficient white blood don’t get it,”

    is intended to be facetious — not a position I advance or support.

  107. Alfred says:
    @annamaria

    I suspected that they had done a “Photoshop” on her to try and make her look more European. 🙂

    • Replies: @annamaria
  108. anarchyst says:
    @EliteCommInc.

    The only reason blacks are successful is because of white support. Name one “successful” black-run city. You can’t because such an animal does not exist. Every one of the blacks you named is successful only because of white support. There isn’t one that would be successful without whites.

  109. Anon[515] • Disclaimer says:

    Kevin MacDonald and Mr Scott should know their efforts aren’t in vain.

    We are all Karl Franz now. And your work won’t be forgotten. Or your sacrifices and pain.

    New generations understand perfectly well the big lies.

    • Replies: @Saggy
  110. Saggy says: • Website
    @Anon

    New generations understand perfectly well the big lies.

    MacDonald is complicit in the big lie, that is, the holohoax, see https://carolynyeager.net/kevin-macdonald-record-saying-whether-holocaust-actually-happened-%E2%80%9Cnot-important%E2%80%9D

    MacDonald was taken by surprise with the first question asked of him: What are your thoughts about holocaust revisionism?

    “Yeah, um, I guess I’m not, uh, I’ve never had any sympathy really, before – I, I haven’t seen, I haven’t seen anything that I would really, you know, convince me.

    Any academic historian who does not expose the preposterous holocaust hoax is complicit in promoting the hoax.

    • Replies: @Anon
  111. @Kratoklastes

    There was no intention by Hitler to ‘conquer the globe’: he had far too dim a view of non-Aryans to countenance having a shitload of untermenschen to babysit for a thousand years.

    Savitri Devi, an ardent Nazi and an Axis spy, was in India during WWII expecting the German and Japanese armies to meet up there. I wonder where she got that idea. Maybe hoping they’d come to liberate whatever was left of original Aryans there in India. The Japs had already made it to Burma and were bombing Calcutta. Germans did make it to Libya and were planning on getting to the Middle East from Africa and Russia. Italians were bombing Palestine. German agents were already working in Iraq and Iran to turn them against the British and the Luftwaffe was flying into Iraq. So yes, Hitler had very modest ambitions of only liberating Germans in neighbouring countries – LOL.

    • Replies: @babu
    , @fnn
  112. Laughing —–

    “There isn’t one that would be successful without whites.”

    The entire black population of Africa has been building, losing and building empires and less than empires before whites even developed white skin. You are too too funny.

    I take it the one drop rule wagon circling argument for success shown for the useless that it is is not replaced by another circular wagon rhetorical flourish.

    • Replies: @EliteCommInc.
  113. Truth3 says:
    @Mark Hunter

    I see just fine. You worship the Jew Ayn Rand, with all her absurd ramblings.

  114. babu says:
    @ssohara

    These are the classic traits of a cake walking coon.

  115. babu says:
    @Commentator Mike

    Some people claim that Hitler was a crypto-Jew.

    • Replies: @Phil_from_NJ
  116. Thank you for this article. Unfortunately it reinforces the behavior of Jews with regard to their chosen methods of warfare against those who do not hold their views – views which as you point out, are not necessarily scientifically based, but rather serve their own nefarious purposes.
    Jews never ever ask the question as to whether certain actions would be good for someone else, or for another group. They are not interested in anybody else except themselves. So the only question that ever crosses their lips, right across the political spectrum is “Is it good for the Jews?”. Others simply do not exist within their purview.
    You article reveals that these people are gangsters, whose modus operandi is violence, which is not only verbal at times, immorality and inhumanity. I know, because I live in Israel, was born Jewish and have among Jews my whole life.
    There is no need for me to repeat what has been said in these columns, but they get away with it because of their hold over international banking and the Holohoax narrative which are intertwined such that they can swing in tandem, if necessary. The Holohoax has served to brainwash Jews all over the world such that they cannot even resist it, remaining therefore, brain-dead with respect to reality and the suffering that they cause.

    • Replies: @Harbinger
  117. Anon[515] • Disclaimer says:
    @Saggy

    Oh be quiet with your purity spiralling.

    It’s quite possible not to want to spend a lifetime warning an event. Lying to non whites is unfortunately a necessity in this world of illegalities they’ve erected.

    All of my male friends and brothers have read culture of critique. I’d rather he wrote it then be imprisoned.

    • Replies: @Saggy
  118. Harbinger says:
    @New Muslim

    “They are not interested in anybody else except themselves. So the only question that ever crosses their lips, right across the political spectrum is “Is it good for the Jews?”. Others simply do not exist within their purview.”

    It is people like you who can really and I mean REALLY make a difference here. You know it. There was a video I saw of late, with E Michael Jones being interviewed by a former Jew, who calls himself Brother Augustine. He woke up. He saw the wrongdoings of the Jews and has been doing his best to steer people away from Judaism. He has been educating them as to why they’re hated, giving blatant examples such as Barbara Specter and other peoples pushing for white genocide. You as a former Jew, know exactly what Judaism is all about and you can help remove Jews from Judaism which really, as far as I can see, if it doesn’t happen then you’re looking at mass bloodshed some time in the future, when the world has enough of what they’ll clearly see as blatant Jewish genocide of their nations.

    The Jews will continue to get away with their perfidy, as long as Jews remain Jews and the programming of younger generations into Jewry continues. I see Judaism no differently to any supremacist organisation. That’s what Judaism really is all about. It’s the KKK, the Black Panthers, the Black Israelites, but for Jews and they stop all criticism of it, down to continued lying about the past, as you stated the holohoax and using the word anti semite as a club to bash anyone who points out bad, Jewish behaviour. Heck, should anyone care to look to see how the ADL actually came about, it sums up Judaism in a nutshell – deception and protecting of wrongdoing.

    I hate Judaism. I will blatantly make that obvious. I don’t buy into the ‘good Jew/bad Jew’ crap because that’s what it is. Jews have been indoctrinated, from a young age to think the world hates them, when they fail to even bother to ask why. They are simply told they’re hated followed by streams of lies about history. Jews need to start walking away from Judaism and guess what? When they do, they’ll no longer be Jews! They have cast aside that wicked cult they belonged to and joined the rest of the human race.

    • Replies: @Preter Natural
  119. @EliteCommInc.

    correction: is now replaced bythis other circular wagon rhetorical flourish

  120. Skeptikal says:
    @annamaria

    “The formerly decent “New Yorker” has been converted into a dirty harlot by Remnick (see Iraq war cheerleading) and his team of presstitutes.”

    You can say that again.
    I canceled my sub about three years ago.
    I couldn’t take it anymore.
    We used to love TNY.
    Many bathrooms in funky cottages in this onetime resort idyll had their walls “papered” with the great New Yorker covers of the forties, fifties, and sixties.
    Peter Arno was one of their wonderful cartoonists who now would doubtless be torn to shreds by the talons of the #MeToo crowd. He loved pretty girls and their lascivious swains way too much, obviously.

    RIP, New Yorker.
    Remnick killed you.

  121. @Truth3

    Are you trying to say that the answer to the 1950s question of why do Jews have big noses (air is free) is wrong?

  122. annamaria says:
    @Alfred

    “I suspected that they had done a “Photoshop” on her…”
    — Agree. It is not for nothing that Ms. Saini attended the Department of War Studies, King’s College London. Deception and Seduction are the proven tools of the zionized warriors at the Centre for Science and Security Studies (CSSS) at the Department of War Studies at King’s College London.
    The experts at the Centre have even managed to beautify the insignificant and thoroughly ignorant Elliot Higgins into an image of a respectable academician. Making average-looking Ms. Saini into a striking beauty by photoshopping her nose and eyes and chicks and chin was a child’s play.

    A dirty profiteering hog: https://www.sott.net/article/384419-Anatomy-of-a-NATO-troll-Eliot-Higgins-of-Bellingcat

    The Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons Losing Credibility As Even More Revelations Surface On Douma: https://caitlinjohnstone.com/2019/10/28/opcw-losing-credibility-as-even-more-revelations-surface-on-douma/

  123. The book Disaster By Decree: The Supreme Court Decisions on Race and the Schools by Lino A. Graglia settles the issue of forced busing.

  124. Wally says:
    @Bookish1

    Hello Bookish:

    – I feel that beneath it all most people do realize that the story is a load of crap, pardon my French.

    – But when the subject comes up so many become deer in the headlights.
    – They’re the silent enablers that those fleecing us count on.

    – Just look at some of the people at this site for example. They can’t seem to handle the truth.

    Odd phenomenon that.

    Merry Christmas.

  125. Anon[127] • Disclaimer says:

    So videos go up on Unz Review then get restricted on YouTube. Almost instantly.

    This is what got people annoyed in the first place.

    Don’t post anything except mirror content on the Unz Review.

    The censorship is just disgraceful.

    It proves every conspiracy theory ever.

    Just nauseating.

    Unz Review is a form of Honeypot.

    So be careful.

    Just ridiculous.

    Sweden nationalists are now ahead of the social Democrats.

    People don’t like living where their art is suppressed.

    Amazing. It was so quick. Don’t post anything on the Unz Review that isn’t from a free speech container.

    The communists really mean business.

    It’s only a matter of time before they come after the pro Israel videos as well. Can’t even okay games or listen to their music. Things must be really accelerating.

  126. Anonymous[152] • Disclaimer says:

    Unz review is a honey pot for any hint of bad think content linked here. Lesson learned.

    Just one place for free speech. Just one.

  127. denk says:
    @Just passing through

    WASPs and Jews worked together to asset strip and loot the sub-continent, now Indians and Jews are working together to loot WASP countries? Talk about irony.

    This is no way to treat a pardner, old chap !

    https://www.dawn.com/news/1344298

    https://www.afr.com/policy/india-wants-a-quad-to-counteract-chinas-expanding-influence-20180123-h0n1k9

  128. Saggy says: • Website
    @Anon

    Oh be quiet with your purity spiralling

    We have one weapon in our arsenal, the absolutely preposterous holocaust hoax, and there is not one public figure in the US who even dares to mention it, even while we fight wars to maintain the perpetrators and while we cannibalize our own government to make it possible.

    And we have internalized the gag, cowering before a chimera, so that you can write idiocy like

    I’d rather he wrote it then be imprisoned.

    .What we are witnessing would be unbelievable if it were not happening.

  129. fnn says:
    @Commentator Mike

    Hitler wanted a peace agreement with the Brits. They refused and the war had to go on, even in the most unlikely places. THe North Africa intercession was a product of Mussolini’s ambitions and his resultant failures. Hitler had to come and bail him out. The same happened in Greece. As far as India goes, Hitler met with Molotov in Nov. 1940 and tried to get the Soviets to move against the Brits in Iran and India. Molotov wouldn’t bite. But there were no Nazi plans to conquer India that I’ve heard of.

  130. @fnn

    Hitler wanted a peace agreement with the Brits.

    I agree, but how long would it have lasted? He had an agreement with Stalin too and that didn’t last long. In fact he broke it, but I know, he had to as otherwise Stalin would have done it. And so on.

    But there were no Nazi plans to conquer India that I’ve heard of.

    Maybe, but that’s how these things develop. He did want to get to the oil fields of Baku and had he succeeded he’d have continued against his enemies, the Brits, further south and the war would have naturally led him there, as you point out in the reasons for his other campaigns.

  131. @fnn

    Nevermind historical facts.

    Slandering bad people has become a staple of anglo propaganda.

    It is so beautiful — from their vantage..

    If you dare correct their self serving exaggerations, they can then slander you as a defender of criminals.

  132. Anon[170] • Disclaimer says:
    @Just passing through

    How does wealth infer moral, intellectual or any kind of superiority is beyond me. It just means that they’ve been pretty good at scamming a high trust individualistic society since like the tribe, they are also highly ethnocentric, money minded, clannish folks with a very strong in group/out group strategy, with some sub groups much more tribal than others

    I’ve been in tech since 14 yrs and have seen many many layoffs whenever a dothead acquired the reins of power. Mostly whites being displaced by their own, preferably their friends or family or folks from the same region in India. Go to the Cisco or Oracle campuses in the Bay Area and see if you feel welcome in what is supposedly your own country

    These Indians would never tolerate a foreign outgroup to take over an industry completely so as to own it

    • Agree: Commentator Mike
  133. Harbinger says:
    @Just passing through

    The problem is that what’s destroyed the USA is non white migration into it. And we all know just (((who))) was behind all that don’t we?
    So yes, black people have been used as a weapon against whites in the USA, firstly to destroy their communities and secondly them. You’re six times more likely to be killed by a black in the USA than a white, even though blacks are 1/6th of the white population. Listen to, or read, E Michael Jones on how blacks were used to destroy the white neighbourhoods, being shipped in from the south to do so.

    So it’s not really about ‘talking about our society’ in the future, but talking about why our society is the way that it is now. Blacks, in the US, only really have good jobs courtesy of affirmative action. Most are only fit for flipping burgers in MacDonalds and Burger King, because anything that involves the slightest modicum of common sense, most of them are out of the window. It’s why most blacks gravitate towards sports, because you don’t really need to think much about that. It’s far easier to train one’s body as a black than their mind. And they are thus, vastly disproportionately represented within the sporting world, whether it be football, soccer, basketball, baseball, boxing and athletics.

    And whites aren’t the highest earning groups in the US. Jews, Asians and Indian subcontinents are the highest earners. Times have changed, because the whites have been destroyed through the reasons mentioned above.

    The best solution for the US and every European land is simply to repatriate the non whites back to their ancestral lands. The Jews, you find them a landmass, build a big wall around it and lock them in, never allowing any out or communication with the outside world. Unless this is done then the white civilisation will most certainly disappear. It’s a harsh reality when draconian measures have to be instituted in order to save the western civilisation, but people have to realise that immigration was always about destruction of nations, regardless what the Jew media states otherwise. In the past, people defended their lands against invasion. Today, invasion of their lands is backed by their traitorous governments and its called immigration.

  134. Harbinger says:
    @Preter Natural

    There is nothing nuts about my reply whatsover. You seem to think that a Jew is the way they are through genetics, when this is nuts. If you took a Jew, at birth, away from its parents and put it into a non Jewish family, regardless if religious or not, it would not behave like a Jew, because it won’t have been brought up as a Jew. This is simple common sense. It is not the Jew, that’s the problem. It’s the religion, the cult that is called Judaism. It is guilty of continuing counts of child abuse and teaches Jews to hate non Jews.

    Sure, you’ll certainly point towards the Spanish Inquisition and the choice of Jews converting to Christianity or exile, but this never worked for the simple reason that Jews remained Jews, teaching one another Judaism, while pretending to be Christians. What you have to do is outlaw Judaism completely and anyone found teaching it, either imprisoned for the rest of their lives or executed. Judaism needs to be totally expunged from society, or that is, remove the Jews to a landmass and lock them in it, preferably and island, where they can be monitored daily to make sure they’re not up to mischief like making a nuclear MOAB to destroy the world with, which would most certainly be one of their plans of action. Better still, imprison all Jews who have any scientific knowledge and in the new land, have them build their houses and far their lands and that’s it. No technology. A completely agrarian community, almost a Jewish version of the Amish community. Give them their world, but shut them off from all of humanity.

  135. Harbinger says:
    @Just passing through

    I should also add that this has nothing to do with a hatred of anyone, but simply the fact that the west should never, ever have had immigration into it. As stated, our ancestors fought for hundreds of years to protect their borders. Today, the Jew, uses immigration to destroy the west and uses the politicians to promote what can only be legal invasion and colonisation of that land.
    Thailand does not allow non Thais citizenship. The world remains silent on this because it’s not a talking point. (((They’re))) not trying to destroy Thailand yet. As much as the Thais are a lovely, warm, friendly people, they are simply not a threat to the New World Order.
    Anyway, the point is that the only people in Thailand who are allowed to work, own and buy property/businesses are Thais. It’s an exceptionally nationalist state, as is most of the Asian world. This is, the correct way to go. Thailand has a booming tourism industry. Sure, there are lots of older men, coming for the sex, but regardless, the nationalism of Thailand doesn’t stop people coming to it. The very same situation should be implemented within the west. Allow immigration. Allow non whites to come to the western world. Let them spend their money and partake in what it has to offer, but do not allow them to work, buy, rent property and own businesses. This way, they have absolutely no influence upon that society. As in Thailand, the indigenous decide how their country is run and minorities within not only have a limited time allowed to stay there, but have no authority to change the status quo to favour them, resulting in detriment towards the indigenous.

    The Jew has successfully managed to completely indoctrinate and brainwash the European, to attack anyone who fights back against what is the invasion and colonisation of their lands by non Europeans. To put this in perspective, it would have been like the English attacking the English when the Normans invaded in the 11th century. It’s insanity, but nonetheless an indoctrination that’s been highly successful, starting back in the 60’s with the Jewish created civil right’s movements and of course, Race Acts (not laws) which effectively stripped any indigenous fight back against the invading peoples.

    As stated in my previous reply, DNA testing of Africans, unable to trace back their ancestry through obvious name change, will, through haplogroup identification be able to locate where in Africa they are from. Send them back. Let them reconnect to their culture, because the culture they live in and under is not, never has, nor ever will be theirs. The culture of the west is for the European peoples, not for anyone else that is, of course, not unless you were a tyrant seeking to destroy that society, through the importation of aliens forcing them to adopt a foreign culture as their own, thus destroying that very nation from within.

  136. @Just passing through

    Oh it’s much worse than that in India. They have access to public toilets, but Indians refuse to use them on point of principle. The central government, knowing that it was making them look bad, made a massive campaign to build toilets and plumbing, but no one used them.

    A taxi driver was recently murdered for politely asking his fellow Indians to please use the toilet located on the same block. In the countryside rape is endemic when women go to field boundaries to poo. Only India has managed to make dysentery into a mating ritual.

  137. @EliteCommInc.

    It’s apparent from your confused, hate-filled rant that you subscribe to what’s commonly known as the “White Magic” theory of racial education in the current year — essentially:

    1. Negroes are wholly incapable of meaningful learning in the absence of close proximity to members of the European diaspora.

    2. When Africans are placed physically close to Whites for the purpose of education, they benefit from a sort of “White Magic” emitted by concentrations of “Whiteness,” enabling them to learn from an educational process that would otherwise be wholly ineffective.** Educating Negroes in the exact same manner without this “White Magic” simply does not work, because reasons.

    Your confused attempt to promote this rather odd hypothesis raises several obvious questions:

    1. What is your postulated mechanism for this process of transformation? Have you studied it in any detail? Or is it entirely ineffable: a metaphysical construct, a quasi-religious belief, a core element of the “progressive” canon that no one is allowed to examine closely because b̶l̶a̶s̶p̶h̶e̶m̶y̶ “racism?”

    2. Is “White Magic” also required for other non-Whites to benefit from education? Can Japanese, Chinese, Indians, mestizos, etc. learn in the absence of close proximity to Whitey? If so, what accounts for this difference? Is it simply that they are free of da ebils ob da slabery transmitted epigenetically down through the generations in a similar fashion to “muh Holycost Trauma?” If not, what is the shared element among the non-White races that accounts for this difference from Whites?

    3. At what ranges is your putative “White Magic” effective in saving Negroes? Merely a few feet? Or possibly as far as a mile? If you don’t know, is there any practical means by which its intensity can be measured?

    4. How do you plan do ensure adequate exposure of Negroes to this “White Magic” in a majority non-White country? This is where the answer to Question #3 becomes critically important. Perhaps a centrally-located “Whiteness Room” in an otherwise non-White school might have the desired effect, allowing the most efficient allocation of the diminishing supply of White students? Or, if the range of the effect is longer, centrally-located White schools with several non-White schools within a mile or so might be a more practical approach.

    5. Is it possible that other races might have the same salutary effect on African learning that Whites do? Perhaps if we place Chinese or Indians in close proximity to basketball-Americans, their “Yellow Magic” or “Brown Magic” might have a similar effect in optimizing the Negro educational process? In a country with an ever-dwindling supply of White children, this potential solution clearly deserves further study, you know.

    If you have not yet given these questions much thought — you should. The answers are clearly critical in understanding the details of this process, generating support from the various races affected by forced integration, and in planning an optimal distribution of White Magic sources throughout the educational system.

    Just one more note:

    I think integrity and honesty is important as well – regardless of citizen’s skin color eastern, northern, southern, or western.

    Ah, that “eastern” color. Looks like you got hung up transitioning between the “Just Skin Color, Goy!™” and “Just Geography!” variants of ignorant, hate-filled race denialism. You probably should try to stick to one long-discredited semitic canard at a time — it would make your confused, emotionally-incontinent anti-White screeds marginally more coherent. Then again, given your baseline, almost any change would…

    **Alternative hypothesis for how this process “works”

  138. I think my position is pretty clear.

    The black population had civilizations of simple and more complex societies before whites arrived and given the apparent state of affairs of the continent are and will be quite capable of doing so in the future.

    Your response appears to be predicated on something I am not advancing, namely integration. As i have stated repeatedly, I don’t have any objection to segregated education. Nothing in your comments is really related to my response.

    Laughing. I don’t think there is anything magical about what can be learned from whites or anyone else.

    And I have no idea what the holocaust has to do with this discussion.

    I am not sure how to respond to someone who rejects integrity and honesty.
    ——————————–

    Separate but equal is not the same as equal and integrated. Nothing I note advances integration. I I note what I think is the problem with the article as it introduces one issue and then skips to something else. I also note that desegregation was not about mixing kids — the purpose was to ensure equitable education.

    Furthermore, I think a discussion about why busing did not work would have been interesting, the article doesn’t do that. I make some references, I think.
    ——————————–

    Anyone who thinks that social relation interaction can’t have an effect on the populations interacting doesn’t know much about socialization.

    • Replies: @James Forrestal
  139. @EliteCommInc.

    1. You’re talking to yourself, dummy. Surely even a comparative cognitive cripple such as yourself is capable of noticing — and learning to use — this recent innovation?

    2. Perhaps it would help to clarify your “reasoning” process if you attempted to decide on a consistent position with respect to the issue of forced racial integration, rather than simply emoting incoherently while twisting in the wind. Here are your latest stridently-expressed claims:

    “…something I am not advancing, namely integration.”
    “…I don’t have any objection to segregated education.”
    “I don’t think there is anything magical about what can be learned from whites…”

    Fact check: FALSE

    From your initial ignorant, hate-filled rant:

    “historically blacks were barred from educational facilities controlled by whites”
    “defending a process that is built on “color” [race] segregation”
    “I am unclear about the valuations of busing in tacking [sic] segregation”
    [implicit assumption: “segregation” is automatically bad, apparently because any system that does not use force to ensure that Negroes are exposed to adequate levels of White Magic is somehow “not fair”]

    And from your latest post, this:

    “Anyone who thinks that social relation interaction can’t have an effect on the populations interacting doesn’t know much about socialization”

    is merely an attempt to restate the long-discredited “White Magic” canard in a slightly more obscure form.

    Etc.

    And I have no idea what the holocaust has to do with this discussion.

    3. Don’t feel bad. Many concrete thinkers such as yourself have difficulty with even very basic pattern recognition, such as recognizing the similar instrumental purpose of various “oppressor/ victim” narratives. Muh slabery and the issue of jewish civilian casualties in WW2 are both promoted as anti-White narratives that are intended to provide “moral justification” for attacks on Whites by framing those attacks as “retribution” rather than aggression. This is not a difficult concept for anyone with an IQ above room temperature to grasp, btw.

    Clearly, whatever your failed claim to “elite” status is intended to rest upon, it’s not intellectual adequacy. To rephrase the above point in terms that might be slightly more comprehensible to you, the anti-White propaganda narratives based on muh slabery/ Jim Crow and muh Holycost both take the form:
    “Dem crackas/ the White goyim done did us WRONG! We gots da RIGHT to get ’em back!”

    Does that help? If not, perhaps you might also wish to acquaint yourself with this basic concept — and this one — before incontinently spewing your feelz across the interwebz…

    4.

    Furthermore, I “think” [feel] a discussion about why busing did not work would have been interesting, the article doesn’t do that.

    – Everyone understands by now that you feel some very strong feelz about this issue. But “Professor MacDonald wrote an article about a topic that I believe should be suppressed/ censored, when he should have written about a topic that I wanted him to write about!” only makes sense as an “argument” within the constraints set by your own narcissism.

    – The obvious irony of your position [insofar as your confused bleating can be characterized as expressing any sort of consistent position] is clearly lost on you. Professor MacDonald’s piece documents how Professor Scott was repeatedly attacked for his empirically-based research by various minions of systematic semitism, who insisted that he simply must adhere to the anti-White party line on all racial issues, regardless of the facts.

    What was the primary subject of Scott’s research? Forced busing, of course. If you actually wished to learn something useful about the many failures of forced racial busing, you would read The Busing Coverup, by… Ralph Scott. But you won’t, of course.

  140. Laugh.

    look you ignored the commentary preceding where you jumped and assumed that I was advocating integration –and clearly I didn’t, wasn’t and am not.

    now you can flower it up with by adding to the same mistake. But you were wrong from the start and you are wrong now.

    your line of reasoning has little or nothing to do with my comments. As for your attached “response to social interaction. It is not part of any advocacy regarding busing. It’s a simple observation of fact. And explains why parents desire to send their children to X school, live in K neighborhood., associate with L organizations — because its understood that said organizations will by their associations influence behaviors. Laugh, you apparently don;t realize why your parents preferred you hang out with Q instead of R. Your failure is in over generalizing that all all blacks represent some kind of ill. But more importantly the practice of association as to influence is a concept os socialization that has no unique marker to whites. It was not created by whites nor is it owned by whites — it’s wholly human understood reality. Now, that is an observation, it was not used to advocate for busing. Laughing. Would that some magic of any kind would “rub” on you to note the difference between observation and advocacy. But do demonstrate who in this society is not seeking to associate with people who will assist their way for and or upward. Laughing.

    Oy veh. Again with holocaust — laughing. I make no reference to the subject and it makes no sense to introduce it here.

    Hmmmm . . . no. none of those references are about why busing doesn’t work. As I said, i make some observations about why. But thus far aside from your white magic suggestion, nothing approaches that discussion in the commentary. Busing was an attempt to redress something with respect to education that integration it was thought might might alleviate the cause. Now had the author actually introduced those issues, I think it would have bolstered his credibility as to intent.
    Here’s what Dr. Scott contends regarding busing —- instead a host of sideline issues wholly irrelevant.

    • Replies: @James Forrestal
  141. So you don’t understand why people choose to associate with others for how those associations help influence behavior – a staple practice among humans the world over.

    You can’t comprehend stating a conceptual process verses advocating for the same.

    But I have to admit, the “white magic” contend is as humorous as the contend that slave owners had harder work than slaves. That is right up there with that argument and almost as funny. Though I can certainly sympathize that there are no white players as skilled as black players on the basketball court. I am not sure if Mr. Johnson was bused, maybe.

    And because you rode the wrong rails from the start, there’s no way back from your error, which you attempt to slide to at the very end — the failure or success of busing and why. misled by your own agenda.

  142. @EliteCommInc.

    Your continued pathetic failure to comprehend something so simple as the function of the “reply” button is again noted.

    As is your inability to make anything approaching a coherent contribution that is even slightly relevant to the the topic of the OP.

    Sad!

    Oy veh. Again with holocaust — laughing. I make no reference to the subject and it makes no sense to introduce it here.

    No need to feel so bad about your inability to understand. Most concrete thinkers have great difficulty comprehending the concept of “analogies” — it’s not just you. The concept of a general category of “oppressor/ victim narratives targeting White people” will remain forever opaque to you — as will the concept of “Dunning-Kruger effect.” Don’t sweat it. You can’t help it — your incomprehension is not really your fault.

    So you don’t understand why people choose to associate with others for how those associations help influence behavior blablabla

    Still trying to promote that ol’ “White Magic” theory in spite of yourself, eh?

    I take it from your desperate, flailing, failed attempts to derail the thread that you feel that Dr. Scott was not repeatedly attacked by the minions of systematic semitism for his empirically-based refutation of the efficacy of forced busing as a remedy for Negro academic underachievement?

    Or are you admitting that he was, and claiming that these attacks were somehow “justified” because any and all evidence of the failures of forced busing should have been covered up for some reason?

  143. “No need to feel so bad about your inability to understand. Most concrete thinkers have great difficulty comprehending the concept of “analogies” — it’s not just you. The concept of a general category of “oppressor/ victim narratives targeting White people” will remain forever opaque to you — as will the concept of “Dunning-Kruger effect.” Don’t sweat it. You can’t help it — your incomprehension is not really your fault.”

    Comparing my comments to the holocaust is a nonsequitor. Did the white population via the use of the stage engage in oppressing blacks — not doubt. Your interjecting it into a discussion concerning busing makes no sense, not as analogy, not as simile and not as metaphor. One huge difference among many — is the oppression was on the benign trait of skin color verses said religious and cultural practices perceived as cause for concentration camps. And by the way — the historical record is pretty clear — whites did victimize the black population. Side tracking to the any effect won’t help your case.

    You simply toss it out as distraction, there’s no swimming back to shore here. It made no sense the first time you introduced it, it makes no sense now.

    That isn’t even the issue. The issue is busing and the arguments about why it failed or didn’t.

    Laughing still with hanging on the belief that one group of people can’t have an influence on another group. good grief. But let’s take you at your word — white people are not influential in any manner sharp or form — that white skin prevents than from doing anything in any society save existing. You’ll have a tough time unraveling the history of the much bandied about trope: “white man’s burden. White magic, laughing. That has got to be one of the strangest self defeating contentions about. But your argument is not with me — it’s with a several billion whites throughout history who sought to influence people of other colors in the course of several hundred thousands of years. Best fortune making that argument.

    However, since I don’t have an issue with segregation on its face, your entire line of reasoning here from sentence one is as off the rails now as when you started.

    Quite the contrary, the issue introduced was why busing failed. Instead the article danced its way through everything but why busing failed. As I stated from the start — that would have been an interesting discussion. In fact, I make references to some the causes . . . your claim about derailing the discussion is one you will have to take up with the author.

  144. “I take it from your desperate, flailing, failed attempts to derail the thread that you feel that Dr. Scott was not repeatedly attacked by the minions of systematic semitism for his empirically-based refutation of the efficacy of forced busing as a remedy for Negro academic underachievement?”

    I have not said a word in support of busing or against segregation —- however, had the article tackled the issue of why blacks or anyone else challenged the gentleman’s arguments, that would reflect the discussion introduced.

    Once again one’s ability to denote issues does not mean that what is understood is endorsed or not — it is simple acknowledgement. But in a sense you are correct, the idea that whites are incapable of
    influencing others as others influence others and vice versa which I acknowledge as fact regardless of skin color is a strange argument. Laughing, why join: WTO, NAFTA, IMF, NATO, UN o any number of organizations designed to impact various societies would seem a worthless endeavour —

    You are very very humorous. I take it you subscribe to the argument that slave masters had the harder tasks than their slaves.

    “White magic dust” Laugh.

  145. ANZ says:
    @Just passing through

    Skin tone is just a simplified marker for culture, yes? When people talk about whiteness, the color is not the point. It is really the values embodied by Europeans, especially northern Europeans. Even whites don’t like white trash. It’s about behavior and values that define how we interact together that is our interest.

    Thanks for pointing out the ideas of Nordic, alpine and Mediterranean subcategories of European. I’ve come across those terms in Rosenberg’s The Myth of the 20th Century. It was a step to refine what this term “whiteness” means in this context.

    In prison, the yard is 100% racially segregated, at least where I’ve seen personally. It’s a tough environment that demands racial unity. Off the yard, races can work together and socialize, but the yard where everyone can see is only by racial solidarity. It is how inmates must ultimately identify socially. It’s not racist per se. It’s preservationist.

    I submit that current American society is cutthroat enough that we should adopt this rule in open society. It’s not a magic cure-all since there are bad tendencies that reside in white gene pools. But it will make protecting the values and physical existence of whites possible.

    If anyone wants to see what happens without the protective barrier of racial solidarity, look to those who violate this rule in real prison.

  146. @EliteCommInc.

    “The matter is very simple, historically blacks were barred from educational facilities controlled by whites period, that regardless of how qualified they might have been.”

    For good reasons. Here’s one: To keep them away from OUR white women whom blacks are notorious for hitting-on if allowed into our work environment and social circle. “Period.”

    Need more reasons? Do your own research.

  147. “The Guardian piece centers around one Barry Mehler, who has been a longtime anti-race realism activist as head of the Institute for the Study of Academic Racism”

    Every. Single. Time. Or so it seems. It’s not a coincidence. It’s a cohencidence.

    I wonder if Barry would be such a zealous anti-racist and championing the cause of the brutally mistreated and displaced Palestinians had he resided in the Zionist state?

    Fat chance of that happening!

  148. @Harbinger

    “Angela Saini is not British and never will be.”

    Same as a Caucasian who emigrates to China will ever be Chinese.

    “No one pretends that a Japanese or Indian child is English because it was born in England. The same applies to Jews.”–Jewish World, London September 22, 1915

  149. @babu

    Some people claim that Hitler was a crypto-Jew.

    Yawnnn….

    If Hitler was a “crypto-Jew”, Third Reich Germany would’ve had a Central Bank and WWII would’ve been averted.

  150. “For good reasons. Here’s one: To keep them away from OUR white women whom blacks are notorious for hitting-on if allowed into our work environment and social circle.”

    Well,

    I stated the reason. As for color mixing. I am afraid you don’t have a good grasp of human history. The rules, risks of violating the rules formal and informal have never been a barrier for the desires between men and women who so chose to jump the color line. Which of course only highlights its utter artificial existence. The rules of color mixing have been broken since people of different colors first met.

    And by all accounts, even violating the constitutional rights of blacks has not prevented the same.

    But it’s refreshing to have some acknowledge the unconstitutional practice based on color politics of association. Laugh which is an odd stance it suggests two modalities:

    1. that women are under the control of white men —
    2. that whites who contend or complain about the “freedom of association” are dishonest but consistent in every way in playing identity politics and hypocrites in the same breath

    And why the nationalist pose is considered just another white supremacist gambit, evoking a host of advocacy that are undermining the country. All because when tested, the contentions by the majority are proved wanting — your desire to prevent “freedom of association” undermines your own cause.

    And just for the record, crossing the colorline is less than six percent. Not only is your contention hypocrisy, it hyperbolic needless fear mongering. And why the traditionalists are losing ground — the constant hypocrisy and subsequent overreaction.

    There’s a surprise – sadly not.

    • Replies: @EliteCommInc.
  151. “Skin tone is just a simplified marker for culture, yes?”

    No. because we kn ow that africans societies, native americans, india . . . all gad empires, societies whuch included forms of democracy, which did not hit Europe until late in the 1800’s if then. Those afformentioned societies had strict legal rules of conduct, marriage practices, hiearchies, etc.

    Furthermore, when coopted, people of varying skin colors could thrive, all things being equal in the societies they inhabited regardless of skin color. Skin color is not to culture by definition. As the several hundred thousand black germans would tell you before their disappearance during WWII. I think that number is correct.

  152. @EliteCommInc.

    And why the traditionalists are losing ground

    I am a traditionalist

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Kevin MacDonald Comments via RSS
PastClassics
The sources of America’s immigration problems—and a possible solution
The “war hero” candidate buried information about POWs left behind in Vietnam.
The unspoken statistical reality of urban crime over the last quarter century.
Our Reigning Political Puppets, Dancing to Invisible Strings