The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 Lance Welton Archive
DIVERSITY IS STRENGTH! It's Also... India-Pakistan Wars Imported to Leicester, UK
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

See also: “Like The Roman, I Seem To See ’The River Tiber Foaming With Much Blood’”—Enoch Powell’s Great Speech

Leicester is an ancient city of around 350,000 people in English Midlands—only an hour’s drive from Wolverhampton, the hometown of England’s all-too-prescient immigration patriot Enoch Powell. Founded by the Romans, by the Middle Ages it was one of the country’s major trading posts, becoming heavily industrialized during the nineteenth century. It came to international attention in 2012 when the remains of Shakespeare’s famous hunchback King Richard III were found there [Richard III could be buried under Leicester car park, archaeologists say, by Press Association, The Guardian, August 24, 2012].

However, Leicester has long held the attention of British leftists by becoming the country’s most “diverse” city. In the early 1970s, large numbers of South Asians began arriving in Leicester to work in its factories. Some 25% of the Ugandan Asians expelled by Idi Amin in 1972 settled in Leicester. By 1991, Leicester was 28% non-white. In the 2001 census, it was 36% non-white, and by 2011 it had tipped over into being Britain’s first “majority minority city.”

One of Leicester’s Members of Parliament, a black woman of West Indian descent called Claudia Webbe, who was convicted late last year of criminal harassment of her husband’s lover and expelled from the Labour parliamentary group, tweeted on September 17th that:

Leicester is a shining example of how people from different cultures can live together side by side. Our diversity is what makes Leicester special. We are the city where the minorities make up the majority. And we are richer for this vibrant exchange of cultures.

But it appears that Leicester is very far from the beacon of Multicultural harmony that Webbe imagines—which is clearly why she sent out that tweet. In late August, Leicester degenerated into violent rioting, which then continued for almost two weeks, flaring up as recently as September 18th. And this was not a matter of evil “white supremacists” being unhappy about the takeover of what was once an English city. The violence was between Hindus and Muslims.

Naturally, the Pravda-like taxpayer-funded broadcaster BBC (= a much bigger NPR) tried to cover up what was happening. At first, it simply didn’t report the riots, so people learnt about them from alternative media or from local media. Then the BBC carefully reported them without actually giving away any information that would question the “Diversity Is Our Strength” and “Only Whites Can Be Racist” mantras.

Eventually, the BBC admitted that hundreds of people had been rioting in Leicester: “It is the latest in a series of disturbances, including violence following an India and Pakistan cricket match on 28 August” [Hundreds on streets in Leicester disorder, BBC News, September 17, 2022].

In other words, the taxpayer-funded broadcaster had suppressed what was happening on the streets of Leicester for over a week.

Earlier that day, the BBC had reported that there had been disturbances in Leicester and that various young men had been arrested. But it had given no information whatsoever on the cause of these disturbances or the fact that they were anything to do with Muslims and Hindus. It was also relegated to the regional news section [East Leicester disorder leads to 27 arrests, BBC News, September 17, 2022].

The leftist tabloid The Mirror did report the disorder when it happened—but failed to mention it was rioting between Muslims and Hindus [Huge brawl breaks out in UK street as mob throw punches after India vs Pakistan cricket match, by Hannah Dodd & Liam Buckler, The Mirror, September 1, 2022].

So, what has actually been happening in this wonderful example of imported urban diversity?

To its credit, local newspaper the Leicester Mercury was on the case immediately. On August 28th, there was a cricket match between India and Pakistan. It should be emphasized that India (80% Hindu) and Pakistan (overwhelmingly Muslim) hate each other and are engaged in a decades-old border dispute [Why India and Pakistan Hate Each Other, by Shamila Chaudhary, Foreign Policy, February 4, 2014].

India won the match, so Hindus poured onto the streets of the Belgrave area of Leicester to celebrate. Naturally, this rather upset the Pakistanis who lived in the area. The Pakistanis started chanting Islamic phrases, which provoked the Hindus. The Hindus chanted their own offensive phrase, and fighting began, which included police officers, themselves South Asian in many cases, being injured. A video of the disorder soon began to circulate on social media [Violence flares during India v Pakistan cricket street celebrations in Belgrave, Leicester, by Asha Patel, Leicester Mercury, August 30, 2022]. In this video, Muslims had gone into a Hindu area at night and were attacking people’s houses.

The Hindus taunted the Muslims by chanting the Hindi phrase “Jai Shri Ram.” This is offensive because it has been chanted in India during anti-Muslim riots and during attacks on mosques by Hindu nationalists. It literally means “Victory to Lord Ram” and is regarded as “hate speech,” so inflammatory is it for Pakistanis and Indian Muslims [The 3 Most Polarizing Words in India, by Snigdha Poonam, Foreign Policy, February 13, 2020]. They also chanted “Pakistan Murdabad” which translates as “Death to Pakistan” and dates back to the partition of India in 1947 when Hindus and Muslims massacred each other [Why is violence breaking out in Leicester?, by John Connolly, The Spectator, September 18, 2022].

The rioting then continued every night, with young male Muslims and Hindus coming onto the streets, entering each other’s “areas” of Leicester, provoking each other and then fighting. This even started happening during the day. A video, published on September 18th, shows a gang of Hindus turning up in a Muslim area and chanting “Victory to Lord Ram!”

The same video shows large numbers of Hindus marching through a Muslim area of the city, again during the day. That such an illegal march could take place at all is only evidence that the British authorities have lost control of parts of Leicester. They are now exclaves of India or of Pakistan.

The riots soon made it into the Indian media, which interpreted them as anti-Hindu. Reports appeared that, according to witnesses, a Muslim mob vandalized a Hindu temple in Leicester and someone pulled down a saffron flag hanging outside it “amid hooting and cheering by a group of people” [Scared would be understatement: UK’s Leicester riot witness, India Today, September 19, 2021].

Everything was made worse by online rumours that a mosque had also been attacked, which turned out to be false. Claudia Webbe even tried to blame the “Far Right”—the white Far Right, naturally—for stirring up trouble between the communities (which also turned out to be false according to The Spectator’s Connolly).

By September 6, the police had managed to calm down much of the violence, but it still continued to some extent, even though they were using emergency stop and search powers and patrolling the streets at night [Appeals for calm and an end to violence after days of unrest in Leicester, by Asha Patel, Leicester Mercury, September 8, 2022].

Disorder seriously flared up again—supposedly due to social media disinformation about assaults on Hindus by Muslims—last weekend, September 17-18, with Hindus marching through the streets of a Muslim area, as seen in the video above. Over the same weekend, there was conflict in a Muslim area, with bottles being thrown, including at the police.

Muslim Majid Freeman told The Guardian, “We can’t trust the police, we’re going to defend our community ourselves.” Fifteen people were arrested over the weekend to try to stop further disorder [Police call for calm after ‘serious disorder’ breaks out in Leicester, by Aina Khan and Mark Brown, The Guardian, September 18, 2022].

Apparently half of 27 people arrested were not from Leicestershire, the county (= state) that surrounds Leicester. So Hindus and Muslims were coming from other parts of the country to take part in these riots [Half of those arrested over clashes in Leicester from outside county, by Rajeev Sayal et al., The Guardian, September 19, 2022].

There is no “hot take” as to what is happening in Leicester. It is wearisome in its predictability.

As Harvard sociologist Robert Putnam showed years ago, to his great embarrassment, there is no such thing as a “multicultural society.” As he acknowledged:

Residents of all races tend to “hunker down.” Trust (even of one’s own race) is lower, altruism and community cooperation rarer, friends fewer.

[E Pluribus Unum: Diversity and Community in the Twenty-first Century The 2006 Johan Skytte Prize Lecture, by Robert Putnam, Scandinavian Political Studies, 2007].

But if there is to be cooperation, it will be within race, within ethnic group and within religious community. The inevitable result: areas of England that are no longer England and a system of ethnic minority warring microcosms even within those areas.

The amazing thing about Britain is that this problem is entirely self-inflicted—basically within the reign (1952-2022) of the late Queen Elizabeth II. Fittingly, police had to be diverted from her funeral to quell the Leicester riots: https://www.leicestermercury.co.uk/news/leicester-news/quiet-day-east-leicester-officers-7604608 .

As U.K. journalist Julia Hartley-Brewer has put it:

Hundreds of young Muslim + Hindu men, wearing masks or balaclavas, are in violent running street battles against each other night after night for 3 weeks. Not in India or Pakistan. Here in Leicester. This must be the “cultural enrichment” we’ve heard so much about.

Needless to say, for this she has been called ”racist,” but she hasn’t backed down [Julia Hartley-Brewer under fire over Leicester disorder comments with Monty Don leading the criticism, by Joe Mellor, London Economic, September 19, 2022].

Lance Welton [email him] is the pen name of a freelance journalist living in New York.

(Republished from VDare by permission of author or representative)
 
Hide 18 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. Gore 2004 says:

    It’s what white liberals want.

    Tim Wise, Jane Elliott, Eric Bryan Stone want this crap in a neighborhood near YOU.

    • Replies: @William Gruff
  2. Pakistan cannot compete with India – the former’s IQ is lower than what it should be due to the simple fact that its population is Muslim, i.e., more cousin marriages.

    P.S.: Comment based on a paper by – I think! – Dr Donald Templer which, sadly, I cannot locate…

    • Replies: @anon
    , @anon
  3. Wokechoke says:

    A small tactical nuclear bomb would be a good solution for Leicester.

  4. Emma S. says:

    Are White people as a whole too stupid or naive? What has caused the vast majority of them to think diversity is some form of strength? It is really mind boggling.

    • Replies: @Priss Factor
    , @Hitmarck
  5. MarkU says:

    Once up on a time there was a thing called ‘Social Capital’.

    Social capital is “the networks of relationships among people who live and work in a particular society, enabling that society to function effectively”.[1] It involves the effective functioning of social groups through interpersonal relationships, a shared sense of identity, a shared understanding, shared norms, shared values, trust, cooperation, and reciprocity.

    Now we have a thing called ‘diversity’ which could quite reasonably be described as the diametric opposite of social capital (though I note that Wikipedia has some extra verbiage tacked onto the end of the definition of Social Capital to include the word ‘diversity’ as if somehow that made sense and wasn’t innately contradictory)

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_capital

    • Agree: Jim Bob Lassiter
  6. @Emma S.

    Are White people as a whole too stupid or naive?

    Most white people outsource thinking to others. White individualism applies only to a few.

    So, whoever dominates the elite means of control get to mold most white minds.

    How else can we explain the white majority sucking up to blacks and hating on Russia even though blacks are ruining the West while Russia pushes back against loathsome ‘wokeness’?

    Whites are white dummies or whummies.

  7. @Gore 2004

    It’s what the English want because they have voted for it for nearly eighty years.

  8. Alrenous says: • Website

    Honestly I’m disappointed that you find [diversity is strength] has enough credibility to be worth refuting. It should read like, “Poop is neon blue,” like, what is this asshole even trying to claim.

    BTW what it means is that importing human traffick makes you weaker, and thus them look stronger by comparison.

  9. Hitmarck says:
    @Emma S.

    a century of anti-german hatespeech to be frank

  10. The word “our” in the phrase, “diversity is our strength” refers to the Internationalist Jews who came up with the phrase to make their job of ruling the world easier than it would otherwise be.

  11. Wokechoke says:

    Leicester’s Uruk-Kai, Claudia Webbe and the Dindu-Pak.

  12. They are fighting over who gets to rape the White baby girls. Anyone who imports these people into your nation is your mortal enemy.

  13. The more the diversity, the more the perversity!

    • Thanks: Achmed E. Newman
  14. Phibbs says:

    Jews have always been at the forefront of those advocating for multiculturalism. Compared to Jews, not even blacks & mulattos (17% of the U.S. population) can match the 2% Jew population for destructiveness.

  15. anon[103] • Disclaimer says:
    @Vergissmeinnicht

    Definitely . Particularly when it comes to violence “-Pakistan cannot compete with India”. Can it be the JQ? Modi is in deep embrace with Israelis .RSS has been for last 60 years or so since 1967 war. Before that it was in full enthrall to Nazi esque violence .Hitler was one of the Hindu gods still looking for a place in the pantheon -now in hiding though . Expediency -they call it.


    Early this month, when Sadhvi Ritambhara was in London to address a gathering, massive protests broke out
    “In 2008, a determined cabal of anti India leaders was responsible for cancelling Narendra Modi’s UK visa just as he was about to board a flight to London. ”
    https://www.newindianexpress.com/opinions/2022/sep/25/western-hinduphobia-is-an-envious-backlash-2501552.html
    See how they distort and glamorize the criminals.

  16. anon[103] • Disclaimer says:
    @Vergissmeinnicht

    The Islamisation of British education made some schools ban the greeting “Merry Christmas!” to avoid offending Muslim students.

    https://www.newindianexpress.com/opinions/2022/sep/25/western-hinduphobia-is-an-envious-backlash-2501552.html

    Look the way it distorts . Indian high IQ don’t have the guts to pin the blame where it belongs.

    It were the demands of the Jewish people that had banished the greetings and removed Christian presence from the public space .

  17. Thank you for this article, Mr. Welton. 3 years back Peak Stupidity discussed similar stupidity in Sweden – “Importing a civil war, in Sweden”. The county has been importing roughly equal numbers of Iraqis and Iranians. Now, that there’s a recipe for a thriving neighborhood!

    Anyway, I appreciate your writing an article that is about the nuts-and-bolts, on-the-ground scene in this immigration invasion of the Western World. I’d given up on you writing due to the continual psychological explanations of the enemy that seem to have been your thing. I’m sorry, man. I don’t care what their problems are internally. They are the enemy, and we need to treat them as such, rather than be their psychoanalysts.

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply -


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
$
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Lance Welton Comments via RSS
PastClassics
Analyzing the History of a Controversial Movement
Talk TV sensationalists and axe-grinding ideologues have fallen for a myth of immigrant lawlessness.