The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 James Kirkpatrick Archive
Conservative Victory In UK Shows Path Forward for Trump's GOP, If They Have the Wit to See It
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information


Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

Above, screenshot of the NYT’s before and after map.[U.K. Election Results Map: How Conservatives Won in a Landslide, by Allison McCann, Lauren Leatherby and Blacki Migliozzi, December 13, 2019]

Left Twitter is in shock this morning after Boris Johnson won a crushing majority, utterly routing Jeremy Corbyn and the Labour Party. There are the usual cries of doom and gloom from Labourites, who, like the Democrats here, have become the party of hysterical shrieking.

While the Tories consistently held the lead throughout the campaign, there were some polls showing that the race was tightening. Remember, former Prime Minister Theresa May held a strong lead before she called an election to strengthen her hand in Brexit negotiations. But she barely squeaked by with a coalition government. It looked like it was going to happen again.

But it didn’t. Boris Johnson has a clear mandate to “Get Brexit Done.”

One key difference between Johnson and May: the Conservatives campaigned on a strong immigration platform this time. This was wise, especially considering that many people link “Brexit” with “border control.”

However, the main issue was Brexit. The fact I can recall Johnson’s slogan so easily explains a great deal about Johnson’s victory. Health care, terrorism, mandatory sentences, Israel, socialism and other things were all discussed. Yet from beginning to end, Boris Johnson had one clear message–“Get Brexit Done.”

Say what you will about Jeremy Corbyn, but the man has strong views and a clear identity. He’s an old-school Leftist with pure socialist credentials and a passionate following among the youth. He’s also the most despised Labour leader of modern times.

But Corbyn, warts and all, is the same man who almost toppled Theresa May’s government just two years ago. He faced the same accusations of anti-Semitism and extremism then. If none of this hurt him in 2017, why did it destroy Labour in 2019?

Simple–Corbyn had no clear message about Brexit. He endorsed a second referendum, which implicitly attacks the idea of democracy [General election: Final Say referendum will be legally-binding, says Corbyn, by Andrew Woodcock, Independent, November 21, 2019]. Do people just keep voting until they get the “correct” result?

Making things even more confusing, Corbyn said he would stay “neutral” during another referendum campaign [Corbyn defends his pledge to stay neutral in second referendum, by Simon Murphy, The Guardian, November 23, 2019]. How can any party leader stay “neutral” on the most pressing issue of the day? If you are going to run on a revolutionary platform, you need to give the masses a single idea to rally around. Instead, Corbyn slapped together a grab-bag of policy suggestions. Some were popular, but an aging socialist with a history of problematic statements (including about the IRA) was not the right standard-bearer.

In contrast, Boris Johnson was relentless. “Get Brexit done,” he repeatedly said. He aligned himself with small-d “democracy” and pledged to get this issue out of the way. Were it not for Boris Johnson’s passionate support for Brexit, there’s no way Brexit would have passed to begin with. Unlike May (a Remainer), people knew where Johnson stood.

I suspect that even many who weren’t happy about Brexit prefer a decision, any decision, to even more uncertainty. The markets certainly reacted this way, as the pound soared [Johnson vows to get Brexit done after big election win, by Alice Ritchie, Robin Millard, and Dmitry Zaks, Yahoo News, December 13, 2019]. A bad plan, violently executed, is better than a perfect plan hesitantly executed. Now, everyone knows that Brexit will happen, and the country can move on.

Move on to what? Unfortunately for those who support the Union, Brexit means increased support for Scottish independence and more tension in Ireland. The left-nationalists of the Scottish National Party picked up seats and there’s already talk of another independence referendum [Scotland’s Sturgeon calls for fresh independence vote after UK election landslide, by David Reid and Spriha Srivastava, CNBC, December 12, 2019]. Still, given that the EU did not support the independence movement in Catalonia, it’s doubtful that the EU would support any kind of separatism, and Scottish independence without EU membership is untenable.

Ireland is more complicated. The Democratic Unionist Party, which was formerly part of the coalition government, was routed, and Sinn Fein picked up seats in Northern Ireland. Ireland is a member of the EU so if the south can somehow annex the north, that issue would be settled. Northern Ireland would not have to go it alone. The stakes here are enormous, and “The Troubles” may return.

American conservatives were overjoyed about Johnson’s victory because it seemingly “proved” Bernie Sanders-style socialism is a loser. They should be cautious. Boris Johnson pledged “record funding” for the National Health Service and more public spending on infrastructure [Boris Johnson vows to smash through Brexit and toughen up on sentences as part of six-point election pledge, by Matt Dathan, The Sun, December 11, 2019]. In the American political environment, Conservatism Inc. types would be screaming that Boris Johnson is a socialist.

We also don’t know whether Johnson can consolidate his hold on formerly Labour areas that broke for him [The 24 Labour heartland seats lost to the Tories for the first time in decades, by Jamie Johnson, Izzy Lyons, and Ashley Kirk, The Telegraph, December 13, 2019]. Once Brexit is done, what do the Tories offer workers?

There’s a real danger that these Conservatives will do what Republicans in America do. They’ll offer patriotic workers symbolic (and largely meaningless) victories in the culture war but won’t help them with populist economic policies. If the Tories don’t support British workers and revert to bland slogans about “free markets,” I wouldn’t be surprised if a post-Corbyn Labour party can win these voters right back once Brexit is out of the way.

Still, Johnson has a clear opportunity to build a new kind of Conservative party. Labour is hopelessly split between urban, wealthy, pro-EU managerial elites and its former working-class base.

Go on Twitter and look at the emotional screeds penned by effete weirdos who think Boris Johnson is the reincarnation of Benito Mussolini. What do these people have in common with the coal miners who fought Margaret Thatcher?


Furthermore, the Third World auxiliaries that Tony Blair’s government imported to “rub the Right’s nose in diversity” (their words) don’t respect the taboos about Israel. Labourites don’t just have a class conflict, but an ethnic conflict between Muslims and Jews within their own party [Anti-Semitism and Brexit shatter Corbyn’s dreams of global far-left revolution, by Alice Ritchie and Robin Millard, The Times of Israel, December 13, 2019]

In contrast, Johnson has managed to drive many Conservative Remainers out of the party, while expanding his party’s overall majority. The Conservative majority of David Cameron was a different party than Johnson’s Conservatives. This is an amazing political achievement. The Tories have deep divisions too, but this morning they clearly seem more united than Labour.

Though that’s not saying much:

Johnson is a squish on immigration and not the brave opponent of Political Correctness he’s made out to be. However, he’s also charismatic, intelligent, and ambitious, and he may deliver for immigration patriots and workers out of sheer self-interest. He knows which way the wind is blowing.

Johnson has the same opportunity President Trump had in 2016, when he promised a “workers’ party.” Trump blew it. He supported Paul Ryan’s GOP agenda, which is why Republicans were trounced on health care and tax cuts in 2018, why Trump was betrayed by his Never Trump staff, and why the president is now being impeached.

I don’t think Johnson will be rolled quite so easily. Republicans are right to pay close attention to yesterday’s results. But they should see it as a warning as much as a cause for hope.

Workers are ready to turn to the nationalist right, but conservatives (both large- and small-C) must offer something more than rhetorical support.

James Kirkpatrick [Email him |Tweet him @VDAREJamesK] is a Beltway veteran and a refugee from Conservatism Inc. His latest book is Conservatism Inc.: The Battle for the American Right. Read Editor Peter Brimelow‘s Preface here.

(Republished from VDare by permission of author or representative)
Hide 9 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. anonymous[206] • Disclaimer says:

    Anti-Whites say ‘diversity’, they just mean Less White People. Preferably, none.

    100% Black = diverse enough.
    100% Asian = diverse enough.
    Any percentage White = ‘needs diversity’

    Non-White Privilege? Borders.

    When the 90% of the world’s population we call minorities becomes 100% through mass immigration and assimilation, we’ll be ‘diverse enough’. The ‘race’ problem will be solved.

    If this was happening to any other people, it would be called genocide.

  2. Anonymous[337] • Disclaimer says:

    Boris Johnson couldn’t be more different to Donald Trump, I don’t know why so many think they are similar. Johnson has been pro-mass immigration and pro-LGBT for his entire political career, and is a career politician which is precisely what Trump is not.

    Johnson is in his position because he is extremely aristocratic and privileged, he hasn’t achieved anything personally outside of politics.

  3. LondonBob says:

    Good piece, agree with a lot of it. Main difference with the US is the loony left is even bigger and stronger in the US, and the demographics are better in Britain.

  4. Dumbo says:

    Boris Johnson ant his “conservatives” put out a commercial with a mixed race couple: black man, white woman, of course. Whatever he says or does is irrelevant. Sick and tired of cuckservatives. He’s also very much pro-gay. I doubt he cares much about workers either.

    • Agree: houston 1992
  5. In looking at the UK election post-mortems the thing that strikes me is how the commenters freely express contempt and hatred for one another. I am inclined to think Kek is interfering before it’s Putin, but the clever sowing of dissension inside the opposition looks to me like it is the way to go. Most of them don’t seem to like each other any more than they like us, i.e. not at all.

    I am pretty sure Obama despises Hillary Clinton, and I bet he dislikes Biden nearly as much. Biden’s poll numbers with black voters are supposedly in the clouds. They think he is inside Obama’s halo.

  6. I don’t trust Johnson as far as I can throw him on immigration, but if he can pass some sort of Brexit deal, then he will (perhaps unwittingly) help to set up a post-Brexit political climate in which British nationalism can finally get off the ground. The most practical option here seems to be a re-branding of UKIP into a liberal nationalist party along the lines of the Swedish Democrats or the Danish People’s Party.

    Another aspect of Brexit that many nationalists fail to appreciate, is that Brexit may well will be good for nationalists in Europe. Without the support of neoliberal Britain, France and Germany will find it increasingly difficult to contain the growing nationalist threat from other EU members like Hungary, Poland, Austria and Italy.

  7. Beckow says:

    …Without the support of neoliberal Britain, France and Germany will find it increasingly difficult to contain the growing nationalist threat…

    That’s exactly what will happen. EU without Britain (still a big if) will be hopelessly unbalanced. Britain was one of the pillars of Brussels neo-liberalism always siding with the globalists and being the second biggest funder after Germany.

    Another factor is that most easterners largely wanted into EU because of Britain: from moving there to the English language, the supreme attraction was always being able to move to London on a whim. As millions did as soon as they could.

    That’s why EU without Britain – if it happens – is a major step-down. It will be poorer, more isolated, a collection of poorer regions with a small over-burdened, largely German core, and using a language that is foreign to all of them (other than Ireland). If EU then expands and accepts more poorer countries – and all potential additions are much poorer than even the poorest parts of EU are today – the imbalance could be fatal. Then the richer, smaller parts might just decide to follow Britain (Scandinavia, Czechia, Austria,…) – after all with Britain out, the number of prosperous European countries outside of EU would reach a critical mass: Norway, Switzerland, Iceland,…

    That’s why I wouldn’t trust Boris, he is a hired clown, he might still betray…

    • Replies: @Justvisiting
  8. @Beckow

    FDR’s famous promise not to send US troops abroad (1940):

    Will future generations be playing videos of Boris promising Brexit?

    Stay tuned…

  9. Key message: it’s easier for the right to move left on economics than it is for the left to move right on identity

    Johnson has grasped the new formula

    If and as identity continues to replace class as the most prominent electoral cleavage, I hope it continues to be easier for the right to move left on economics than for the left to move right on identity.

    There is reason to think so. The rightwing voter base doesn’t much mind going left on economics, but the leftwing (ie anti-white) voter base would feel totally betrayed by a move right on identity.

Current Commenter

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone

 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All James Kirkpatrick Comments via RSS