The Unz Review: An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 Peter Brimelow Archive
Christchurch Massacre
Yes, It’s Terrorism, Yes, It’s Tragic—and Yes, Elites Could Halt It, By Halting Immigration. But They Won’t.
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

Earler: Why No Stories About Whites Fearing “Backlash” After NZ Shooting? Because Of Cultural Marxist Narrative Control—And That’s Part Of The Problem

I usually react strongly against the idea that any of the repeated Muslim mass murders in the West is a “tragedy,” as General George Casey notoriously described the Fort Hood shooting—they’re ATROCITIES, dammit. And I’m skeptical of Main Stream Media’s attempts to brand killings by whites as “terrorism”—it’s a usually just a ploy to call in draconian anti-terror statutes to suppress political dissent, as with the crazed iconoclasm directed at Confederate memorials that followed the (very minimally-connected) Dylann Roof shooting. However, the Christchurch NZ massacre is different. Although apparently the act of an individual, it was terrorism, in the sense that the alleged perpetrator, Brenton Tarrant, consciously used the what Leftists used to extoll as “propaganda of the deed” to achieve a specific political goal. And it is a tragedy, in the sense that it was predictable and preventable, but no-one listened. The good news: massacres like this, and the Muslim atrocities that apparently provoked Tarrant, are still preventable—by ending mass Third World immigration. The bad news: Western elites just won’t do it. They prefer repressing the white host nations. But it won’t work.

In a peculiarly religious act of anathematization, Tarrant’s manifesto seems to have been largely scrubbed from the internet. This in itself shows how completely Cultural Marxist totalitarianism has displaced classical liberalism in Western elite ideology—none of this Brandeis-type nonsense about sunlight being the best disinfectant. Of course, VDARE.com will respect this taboo: we have enough problems with deplatforming as it is. But it’s ironic that the paradoxical effect of this censorship can only be to increase traffic to Andrew Anglin’s crypto-Nazi Daily Stormer website, where the both the manifesto and the shooting video are permanently archived.

Across the world, response to these atrocities has become boringly ritualized:

(1) extreme public displays of emotion, breast-beating, weeping and wailing, marches etc.;

(2) everyone goes back to their agendas.

In the case of 9/11, this meant making the Middle East safe for Israel by invading Iraq, the exact equivalent of responding to Pearl Harbor by invading China; and continuing to Elect A New People in the U.S.—including, incredibly, importing more Muslims. In the case of Christchurch, it apparently means imposing gun control on a country where widespread gun ownership has long been combined with the commendably low murder rate characteristic of white societies.

Ironically, Brenton Tarrant anticipated this in his manifesto. He pointed out that he could have used many other methods including “vehicular attacks” (as for example in the much larger 2016 Muslim massacre in Nice, France—and, significantly, the 2017 Immigrant Mass Murder in Stockholm, Sweden, which claimed the life of 11-year old Ebba Akerlund, of whom Tarrant writes “the indignity of her violent demise and my inability to stop it broke through my own jaded cynicism like a sledgehammer”).

Sweden attack: ‘Despair’ over death of schoolgirl Ebba Akerland

A school governor says there was “something special” about 11-year-old Ebba Akerland, one of four people killed in Stockholm.

Sky News, April 12,2017

But, Tarrant said, he chose to use firearms to further polarize U.S. debate. And it’s working: Kim Kardashian applauds New Zealand for proposing to change gun laws after shooting: ‘America take note!’, by Kathleen Joyce, Fox News, March 17, 2019.

The elite agenda also includes censorship: A Mass Murder of, and for, the Internet, by Kevin Roose , New York Times, March 15, 2019.

The rationale:

“One of the sickest and most upsetting parts of this for me is that the killings, the actual terrorist attacks, are forms of propaganda for the statements,” said [Matthew] Feldman of the Center for Analysis of the Radical Right. “They draw attentions to their statements through their actions.”

That leaves media organizations in an ethical bind, Mr. Feldman said.

The coverage will be wall-to-wall today,” he said, “and tomorrow it will set someone else off.”

[New Zealand Massacre Highlights Global Reach of White Extremism, By Patrick Kingsley, New York Times, March 15, 2019. Emphasis added].

But it is not “coverage” but objective reality that will “set someone off” tomorrow.

According to the 2013 census, the number of New Zealanders who identify as Muslim was 46,149.

[Former president of the Federation of Islamic Associations of New Zealand Dr Anwar] Ghani said about 30 per cent of this country’s Muslims were born here. Of the remaining 70 per cent who immigrated, most arrived in the past 20 years.

The Muslim population increased six-fold between 1991 and 2006

New Zealand’s vibrant and diverse Muslim community, by Piers Fuller and Lee Kenny , stuff.co.nz, March 16, 2019

This immigration-fueled growth is extraordinary. It raise the question: what does the New Zealand government think it’s doing?

And of course this is nothing compared to Europe or North America. Tarrant titled his manifesto “The Great Replacement,” a concept developed by the French writer Renaud Camus and widely discussed in Europe. This has had the benefit of flushing out what might be called Replacement Denialists: New Zealand attack: How nonsensical white genocide conspiracy theory cited by alleged gunman is spreading poison around the world, by Lizzie Dearden , Independent, March 17, 2019. But, because of mass immigration, the Great Replacement is simply reality: RIP this Britain: With academic objectivity, Oxford Professor and population expert DAVID COLEMAN says white Britons could be in the minority by the 2060s – or sooner, by David Coleman, Daily Mail, May 27, 2016. It’s an unfortunate fact (for the Left) that “genocide” as defined by the United Nations doesn’t just mean extermination, but also displacement.

My old friend David Frum was recently fiercely attacked for suggesting, from his current perch in The Atlantic, that If Liberals Won’t Enforce Borders, Fascists Will| We need to make hard decisions now about what will truly benefit current and future Americans. [April 2019]

But of course Frum is right. Indeed, Tarrant in his manifesto actually describes himself as a fascist, influenced by pre-war British Union of Fascists leader Sir Oswald Mosley.

(It’s also worth mentioning that Tarrant specifically says his “belief in a democratic solution vanished” with the defeat of Marine Le Pen’s Front National in France’s 2017 election, very much the result of legalistic legerdemain. President John F. Kennedy famously said “Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable.” But Kennedy, like Brandeis, has also been pushed aside by America’s Emerging Totalitarian Left).

I haven’t bothered with the usual Politically Correct pieties in discussing the Christchurch massacre, partly because you never get credit for them. But for the record, I do second the PC bleatings of Rod Dreher—and also his substantive point:

One of the biggest lies we hear whenever there is a mass terror attack, such as the one against New Zealand’s Muslims, is that the killing was “senseless.” It’s not without reason when ISIS does it, and it’s not without reason when people like Brenton Tarrant, the alleged NZ shooter, do it. The acts are evil, but not senseless; there is a rationale for what they do….Everything Tarrant identifies as qualities of a disintegrating Western civilization is true. You may think that declining numbers of ethnic Europeans is a good thing, or something that has no particular moral meaning. But it really is happening…It is simply bizarre to think that all Europeans are going to acquiesce gently in the overwhelming of their nations by immigrants in this century.

Radicalization & Degeneration, The American Conservative, March 15, 2019. Link in original.

Similarly, I’ve repeatedly suggested that attention should be paid to the motivations of the few white political killers: James von Brunn, Dylann Roof, Wade Michael Page.

But of course it never is. The Ruling Class absolutely, positively wants to demonize white men and their problems, and lump them in with mass murderers—as also with anyone (for example, Jared Taylor) who thinks seriously about what these tragedies mean.

Significantly, all of these killers acted alone. They appear to be genuine cases of the “leaderless resistance” contemplated by military theorists. It’s very hard to stop them. And until the conditions that provoke them are redressed, they will keep coming.

Peter Brimelow [Email him] is the editor of VDARE.com. His best-selling book, Alien Nation: Common Sense About America’s Immigration Disaster , is now available in Kindle format.

(Republished from VDare by permission of author or representative)
 
Hide 40 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. Muslims are comming to our America for one reason and one reason only:to vote THE HISTORIC NATIVE BORN WHITE CHRISTIAN WORKING CLASS AMERICAN MAJORITY….into a white racial minority within the borders of America

    With the open intent to steal THE LIVING AND BREEDNG SPACE…..

    of YOUNG NATIVE BORN WHITE CHRISTIAN AMERICAN WORKING CLASS MALES……

    In the future, there will be open RACE WAR!!! between Sunni-Shia Muslim Males and NATIVE BORN WHITE CHRISTIAN AMERICAN WORKING CLASS MALES……within the borders of America…..

    Muslims in our America….Preet Bharara’s people…..and Andrew Yang’s people…..Brad Griffith and Richard Spencer also……are demanding that THE NATIVE BORN WHITE AMERICAN WORKING CLASS consent to this Demographic War with the endgame being the complete RACIAL EXTERMNATION of Our People within the borders of America…

  2. massacres like this, and the Muslim atrocities that apparently provoked Tarrant, are still preventable—by ending mass Third World immigration

    Pew has projections of Europe’s Muslim population in 2050 under three scenarios: zero, medium and high migration:

    ‘Even if all migration into Europe were to immediately and permanently stop – a “zero migration” scenario – the Muslim population of Europe still would be expected to rise from the current level of 4·9% to 7·4% by the year 2050. This is because Muslims are younger (by 13 years, on average) and have higher fertility (one child more per woman, on average) than other Europeans, mirroring a global pattern.’

    With zero migration, Pew estimates that France will be 12·7% Muslim by 2050. That figure could be on the low side given that, in 2014, 18% of babies born in France received Muslim forenames.

    Simply ending Third World immigration would not be enough to preserve Europe as a majority white continent.

  3. And with very high probability……..probability 1…..this is just right around the corner:

    US CONGRESSMEN ILHAN OMAR:”White Males….America doesn’t belong to you anymore…Minnesota….Michigan…Utica NY……The Adirondacks….belong to my people….YOU GENOCIDED THE NATIVE AMERICANS!!!…..White Males….GO TO HELL!!!”

  4. 9/11

    The day after standing in the smoldering rubble that was the TWIN TOWERS…..with the homosexual George H Bush….

    THE FUCKING RETARD IRISH CATHOLIC leader of the NYC Firemen….

    “President Bush….WE STAND WITH YOU!!!”

    The FART JOKE BUSH FAMILY….working for the Saudi Royal Family to allow Islam…

    To…..colonize NATIVE BORN WHITE CHRISTIAN AMERICAN WORKING CLASS LIVING AND BREEDING SPACE within the borders of America…..

    Richard Spencer and Brad Griffith….now demand that we trust a highly RACIALIZED China Gook Han…put the fate of Our People….in the hands of the GREATER CHINA GENELINE…..

    The Civil War wasn’t worth it….

    WW 2 wasn’t worth it…..

  5. The real world consequences of allowing Muslims into OUR AMERICA!!!!

    Wounded Warrior Crippled Freaks Show Unending Infomercials……with a big Hollywood Party for the Hollywood Homos on the dock in Sag Harbor……Big White Tent………in August…..raising $$$$……………………The rich Jewboys bring their exotic looking mud-negro girlfriends(fashion models(prostitutes))……….to buy Titanium Insect Limbs for……………….. the DELIMBED NATIVE BORN WHITE CHRISTIAN WORKING CLASS CANON FODDER………..SUPPORT THE CRIPPLED FREAKS!!!!

    • Replies: @Anonny
  6. CanSpeccy says: • Website

    Oxford Professor and population expert DAVID COLEMAN says white Britons could be in the minority by the 2060s – or sooner, by David Coleman, Daily Mail, May 27, 2016. It’s an unfortunate fact (for the Left) that “genocide” as defined by the United Nations doesn’t just mean extermination, but also displacement.

    Already, the British are the minority in London, Leicester, Luton and many other places. In Birmingham, England’s second city, among elementary school children, the English are not even the largest minority. And yes this is genocide, not only as defined by the UN but as defined by the Polish Jewish scholar Raphael Lemkin who coined the term. But if you say so, then as the Guardian and the rest of the MSM will loudly proclaim, you’re a far-right-wing extremist, racist, anti-Semite against genocide of your own race and nation. What we are seeing, is genocide by a combination of suppressed native reproduction through state-enforced sex “education”, mass replacement immigration, and political correctness.

    And the reason: global governance: a project of the Money Power that seeks unconstrained freedom to move labor, capital, and manufacturing technology wherever they want to minimize costs and taxes while maximizing profit. And if that means genocide of the European nation states, then puppets such as Blair, Trudeau, Obama will ensure that the native resistance is destroyed, aided by settler immigrants with no compunction about asserting dominance over the indigenous population. Europeans are going the same way as the Amerindians.

  7. NO MUSLIMS IN OUR AMERICA….NO 9/11…

    NO MUSLIMS IN OUR AMERICA….NO TWIN TOWERS ATTACK 1993…SNOWY FEBRUARY DAY

    THE ….FART JOKE BUSH FAMILY IMPORTED THEM…

    1+1=2…….

    • Replies: @nik1975
  8. Dona says:

    Frankly, I don’t feel anything, any regret or sympathy.

    After years and years of reading of the horrors, islamics commit. So now, the worm had turned.
    islamics beaded two girls in Morocco, The heads of 50 Yazidi women were found in Syria. And other massacres and horrors. Over and over.
    The slaughtered committed by the islamics against non-islamics.
    And recently. All hardly made a fuss over by the MSM, and all of a sudden, the MSM has exploded over this incident! Such a to do!

    • Replies: @nik1975
  9. Anonny says:
    @War for Blair Mountain

    All you do with your spam is make whites look retarded.

    Stfu & go visit this site stronglifts.com

    • LOL: Talha
  10. Enrico23 says:

    Please watch the actual video…..FAKE… the spent cartridges must be cgi…. they disappear before hitting the ground! The NZ government is threatening 10 years in prison for showing the video!

    • Replies: @NoseytheDuke
  11. At the most fundamental level….it’s all about which Demographic Racial Tribe controls THE LIVING AND BREEDING SPACE of America…….

    It’s a game of Demographic-Racial-Tribal-Go………Pershaps we should call it the game of BLOOD SPLATTER GO!!!….For Evolutionary reasons….that’s how this game has always been played…….If you think it’s not….then you will be conquered…..and enslaved…..

  12. nik1975 says:
    @War for Blair Mountain

    funny but isnt Islam a religion? … so… ummm … not a nationality…

    so No Muslims in America… firstly America is a continent

    secondly… if a US citizen decided to become Muslim… it is a religion after all… then what? get rid of them?

    your mind is lazy

  13. If you voted for the wrinkly old fart joke Ronnie Reagan….in 1980…..

    You voted for the snarling fanged taunting visage of the Somalian She-bitch from Minnesota on TV everyday:”White Males…got to HELL!!!”

  14. nik1975 says:
    @Dona

    hi Dona

    actually I dont agree with you

    firstly Islamists did not behead two girls in Morroco… Terrorists did… and there is the crux of why you are wrong on several levels

    The Christian West has murdered millions of Muslims through the US occupation and destruction of several Islamic countries

    remember that these guys have brains and they see who has murdered their families. It is actually natural for immigrants from war torn countries to repay this hospitality by raping and pillaging their host nations.

    Also remember the Palestinian issue … ie Apartheid in the middle east

    no matter what you are told to think , this single issue of Apartheid will always have disasterous blowback against Jewish communities, US communities and UK communities

    sorry Dona but I find your analysis a bit lite on the analysis and a bit heavy on the BS

    • Replies: @CanSpeccy
    , @Pericles
  15. CanSpeccy says: • Website
    @nik1975

    Yes, it is idiotic to blame the victims of a massacre for their own slaughter. Most people, of whatever race, religion or political stripe are mere pawns in a game controlled by elites who have no compunction about murdering anyone who gets in their way. The victims of the New Zealand massacre were almost certainly just ordinary folk, as decent as any you are likely to find anywhere. That they are ruled by Islamic elites who seek conquest and the destruction of Christian civilization does not make their followers any more evil than the supporters of George Dubya Bush, who during the shock and awe destruction of Baghdad is said to have declared “I FEEL GOOD.”

    No, the victims in New Zealand were almost certainly just ordinary folk who wound up n New Zealand in pursuit of their economic interest, the pursuit in which all humanity is engaged.

    But that does not mean that their murder was meaningless. Clearly it was provoked by the belief that they and their kind will destroy the West, which if unchecked, they certainly will.

    See life is tough. Conflict is real. Hating the victims just makes it easy for the Treason class to shut down those who oppose the Islamification of the West. Hating the victim makes you and all who agree with you the ultimate in evil according to the religion of Political Correctness: it makes you a hater.

  16. CanSpeccy says: • Website

    Odd thing about this post is that it appeared as a headline article on the Unz Review for about five minutes and then was yanked. Anyone know why? Does it perhaps clash with the ultimate aims of the Unz Review, or what?

    • Replies: @atlantis_dweller
  17. As the irresistible force of globalism continues to meet the (supposedly) immovable object of nationalism many more such incidents can be expected. I doubt though that nationalism won’t eventually be overcome. This sort of thing has happened many times in the past, and it is always nationalism that has been destroyed. For where now are the Picts, the Celts, the Saxons, Lombards, and the rest? It’s all in the course of things for tribes and even whole races to disappear as they are absorbed into an empire, and technological civilization has now reached the stage at which the empire is global.

    That being the case, it’s clear that white civilization — Western civilization — the point of origin for the technological expansion, has all along faced a choice: either exterminate non-whites globally, or incorporate them. It’s equally clear that, for what are a variety of reasons, it has decided on the latter course of action. But since white people now constitute only about 10% of the world’s population, it necessarily follows that genetic integration of the white race with the rest of the world’s population will destroy it. By choosing to expand their civilization to include the whole world, while at the same time refraining from genocide of other races, the white race has implicitly chosen suicide for itself.

    Brimelow’s subhead reads: “Yes, It’s Terrorism, Yes, It’s Tragic—and Yes, Elites Could Halt It, By Halting Immigration. But They Won’t.” He doesn’t speculate about the reasons behind this decision, but it wouldn’t be surprising at all if the governments of Europe, wanting to expand their reach, chose to import a dependent class of people, since doing so would only increase their institutional power. This can’t be the official reason given, naturally. Then it would seem too self-serving. Altruistic excuses must figure prominently instead. Refugees from war-torn areas must be given sanctuary. Economic refugees must be given a “chance at a better life”. And of course, it may really be true that additional people are needed in the nation in order to shore up the economy, since due to widespread availability and use of contraception and abortion white people aren’t able to keep up their populations.

    This then has all the signs of a racial suicide driven by forces internal to the civilizational process itself, and interacting in an unfortunate way with the ethical and religious foundations of that civilization. A willingness to commit genocide against non-white races could save the white race, but that’s proscribed by its ethics. Even willingness to ban abortion and contraception to its females, coupled with discouraging racial mixing, could help it stave off extinction, at least temporarily, but that too would be considered an unethical interference with individual freedom, not to mention a “racist” offense against one of its highest principles, racial equality. For if all races are the same, which is an unquestionable orthodoxy among white people, then why struggle to preserve the white race at all? Change can only come when white people decide to affirm the value of their own existence as a race, but that doesn’t seem at all in prospect. It would violate too many of their ethical norms.

    • Replies: @CanSpeccy
  18. Corvinus says:

    “The good news: massacres like this, and the Muslim atrocities that apparently provoked Tarrant, are still preventable—by ending mass Third World immigration.”

    The fact of the matter is that some deranged lunatic willingly chose to employ violence on a group of people. It is called free will.

  19. CanSpeccy says: • Website

    The fact of the matter is that some deranged lunatic willingly chose to employ violence on a group of people.

    How do you know he is a lunatic?

    And if he’s a lunatic, how can you say his action was a matter of free will?

    Doesn’t the law acknowledge that insanity mitigates guilt, i.e., that it assumes that an insane act is involuntary and therefore not a matter of free will?

    You seem to be struggling to make a point without a reason.

  20. CanSpeccy says: • Website
    @Dr. Robert Morgan

    Change can only come when white people decide to affirm the value of their own existence as a race, but that doesn’t seem at all in prospect. It would violate too many of their ethical norms.

    Their ethical norms having been created by the substitution of Political Correctness for Christianity as the state-imposed religion of the West.

    But the lunacy of accusing opponents of their own genocide of racism, may be seeping into public consciousness. I think there is money to be made selling yellow vests. Brimelow and company should get on it.

  21. CanSpeccy: “Their ethical norms having been created by the substitution of Political Correctness for Christianity as the state-imposed religion of the West.”

    Seeing whites as a helpless victims of “outside forces” is self-defeating, since if whites aren’t masters of their own destiny, then what hope can there be? The truth is whites created political correctness and willingly accede to its main tenets. Racial and sexual equality have very deep roots in the Christian religion, and today all of the mainstream Christian churches subscribe to “politically correct” doctrine. Some say these churches no longer represent “real” Christianity, but this isn’t persuasive, since for two thousand years, Christians have been arguing about who the “real” Christians are. Also arguing against its imposition by an outside force is the fact that the vast majority of whites approve of racial and sexual equality, keep voting for it, and keep voting for representatives who make laws and policy based on it. They decry racism and have spilt a lot of their own blood to prove it, e.g. in the American Civil War and in WWII.

    Christianity has been a very good religion with which to found a global empire, but its universalism and its obsessive concern with an imaginary afterlife makes it a very poor religion for the preservation of race.

    • Replies: @CanSpeccy
  22. Here’s whyhero, Mr. Tarrant, acted:

    https://web.archive.org/web/20140727140346/http://stuff.co.nz/world/middle-east/10310496/A-kiwi-lads-death-by-drone

    https://web.archive.org/web/20190317042128/https://www.newshub.co.nz/nznews/christchurch-mosque-linked-to-alqaida-suspect-2014060417

    It’s called self-defense.

    All hail the British Grenadiers! (which, if you haven’t seen the videos, was being played by Mr. Tarrant as he drove to the Mohammedan terror cell.)

  23. Hail says: • Website

    The acts are evil, but not senseless; there is a rationale for what they do….Everything Tarrant identifies as qualities of a disintegrating Western civilization is true. You may think that declining numbers of ethnic Europeans is a good thing, or something that has no particular moral meaning. But it really is happening…It is simply bizarre to think that all Europeans are going to acquiesce gently in the overwhelming of their nations by immigrants in this century

    Excellent point by Rod Dreher here.

    I propose only one minor amendment/expansion, re the ‘moralizing’:

    While we cannot deny that the act of killing random, innocent Muslims is fairly qualified as evil (a very easy label, indeed, to to pin to the mosque attacks; one that takes no particular moral courage to make), it’s worth venturing out onto the limb a little and saying it straight: Also evil are the ‘acts’ that provoked the political murders*. Ethnocide is evil.

    _______

    * (I refer, inter alia, to the dumping of millions of non-Western foreigners, especially Muslims, on the West with no end in sight, no recovery in sight, and Islamic majorities in sight within the lifetime of a child born today; I refer also to the seizing control of the cultural apparatus and reorientation thereof towards demonization and humiliation of Western people in their own countries since circa Q3 of the 20th century, ramped-up in Q4 and still chugging along as we approach 21st century Q2; I refer further to the use of the state apparatus to actively suppress local pride [“political police” and large-scale, selective prosecutions of nationalist dissidents], while simultaneously promoting aggressive forms of nationalism for the aforementioned foreigners/Muslims; In short: “We’re always wrong and they’re always right”-ism. These are evil acts.)

  24. @Enrico23

    Do you have a link where it can still be viewed? Any idea about where any independent analysis of the video can be found? Thanks.

    I have assumed that this was an orchestrated event of some kind in order to manufacture consent for more curtailment of free speech online, further gun controls and yet more demonisation of white people who are concerned about the levels of migration from the third world into their counties. It is very interesting and revealing to see how the mass media have chimed in with a chorus of outrage yet have little to say about muslims being slaughtered in Gaza, Yemen and so many other places ongoing. Cheers.

    • Replies: @Svigor
  25. CanSpeccy says: • Website
    @Dr. Robert Morgan

    Seeing whites as a helpless victims of “outside forces” is self-defeating, since if whites aren’t masters of their own destiny, then what hope can there be?

    One has to see what is, not what one would like to see. Whites, which is to say the 99%, are virtually helpless victims of an elite that despises them and has despised them for at least these last 200 years and more. As Disraeli put it in the novel Sibyl, there are in England:

    Two nations; between whom there is no intercourse and no sympathy; who are as ignorant of each other’s habits, thoughts, and feelings, as if they were dwellers in different zones, or inhabitants of different planets; who are formed by a different breeding, are fed by a different food, are ordered by different manners, and are not governed by the same laws.

    You say:

    The truth is whites created political correctness…

    That is incorrect. Political correctness was created not by whites, but by the elites of white nations, elites many members of which are not white, but who, whatever their color, have sympathy only with other members of their own class, not with the common people of their own nation.

    today all of the mainstream Christian churches subscribe to “politically correct” doctrine.

    The church is part of the structure of the elites, and naturally teaches whatever the elites decide the masses must believe.

    the vast majority of whites approve of racial and sexual equality, keep voting for it, and keep voting for representatives who make laws and policy based on it.

    This is such drivel that one almost suspects you are an agent of disinformation paid by some agency of the elite: maybe one of Cass Sunstein’s agents of cognitive infiltration. Anyway, what you say is utter bunk. For example, on the question of immigration, large majorities in Britain and presumably all the other euro countries have been consistently against mass immigration, as poll after poll has shown. So no, the Brits, the Italians, the French, and even the Canadians don’t believe a lot of foreigners have an inalienable right to come and take over their homeland, whatever traitors like Tony Blair, or jerks like Justin Trudeau, may say.

  26. Svigor says:

    In a peculiarly religious act of anathematization, Tarrant’s manifesto seems to have been largely scrubbed from the internet.

    https://dailystormer.name/permanent-link-brenton-tarrants-smart-manifesto-and-slick-video/

  27. Svigor says:
    @NoseytheDuke

    It is very interesting and revealing to see how the mass media have chimed in with a chorus of outrage yet have little to say about muslims being slaughtered in Gaza, Yemen and so many other places ongoing. Cheers.

    The TDS guys made very similar points in their latest podcast (TDS 418). When the US gov’t slaughters hordes of Muslim innocents in Israel-adjacent countries, (((Big Media))) generally ignores it. They certainly don’t go into meltdown over the “tragedy.” But when some cracker does it as a private, instead of public exercise, suddenly it’s da end of da woild.

  28. CanSpeccy: [quotes Disraeli]

    You didn’t answer the question. What hope can there be? There’s no known case of a puppet ever revolting against a puppeteer.

    CanSpeccy: “The church is part of the structure of the elites, and naturally teaches whatever the elites decide the masses must believe. ”

    This is just more “whites-as-helpless-victims” conspiracy thinking. As I mentioned, that point of view is self-defeating, since once you posit 99% of whites have no will of their own, they are doomed anyway. The fact is they show their approval in the only way that matters, by going along with it.

    CanSpeccy: “For example, on the question of immigration, large majorities in Britain and presumably all the other euro countries have been consistently against mass immigration, as poll after poll has shown.”

    Learn how to read. I said they voted for it, and put the representatives in place that make the laws and carry out the policies, which is undeniable. Polls have nothing to do with that, and can be rigged to produce any result the pollster wants. Also, I was speaking of the West’s endorsement of racial and sexual equality generally, but if you want to talk about immigration, in America at least, the politicians have had plenty of time to revise the system, but they haven’t, and keep getting re-elected over and over again despite this. Again, this is approval by the white public in the only way that’s important.

    • Replies: @CanSpeccy
  29. Pericles says:
    @nik1975

    It is actually natural for immigrants from war torn countries to repay this hospitality by raping and pillaging their host nations.

    Quite reasonable, wouldn’t you agree?

  30. It’s always good to see the word “legerdemain” employed.

  31. @CanSpeccy

    A mistake that got corrected, probably.
    When the right time comes, it’ll get back in the headline.

    • Replies: @CanSpeccy
  32. CanSpeccy says: • Website
    @Dr. Robert Morgan

    Learn how to read.

    Yes, doctor. Thank you doctor. I’ll try to do better in future, doctor.

    As for your point:

    I said they voted for it, and put the representatives in place that make the laws and carry out the policies, which is undeniable.

    That is so naive, that again, I have to suspect you are an agent of disinformation.

    First, half the population doesn’t vote.

    Second, most of those who vote don’t have a clue what the election is supposed to be about. Half of them are kids or the mental equivalent voting for lollipops or some other freeby. The rest are people soured on having to pay stupid high taxes to support a gigantic and generally counter-productive bureaucracy, and support hoards of malingerers and other welfare cases.

    Third, whichever side wins, you’ll get the same basic policies dictated not by the people, but by whoever funds the election campaigns and makes the after office payoffs to the leading politicians.

    Why don’t you go away and read some history and come back in a few years when you have something useful to say without sounding so pompous.

  33. CanSpeccy says: • Website
    @atlantis_dweller

    When the right time comes, it’ll get back in the headline.

    Certainly more deserving of profile than most of what appears at Unz.com.

    But about something that the media absolutely do not want to talk about. For the media in general, white genocide is a topic beyond the pale. It’s an outrage, it’s an anti-Semitic attack on the holiness of the Holocaust. And for Dr. Morgan, here, its a topic not worth discussing: White genocide a bad thing? How can that be? It’s what white people want.

    Actually, resisting white genocide is an attack on all that the Money Power desires: globalization, with no independent, democratic, sovereign nation states.

    Kill whitey and you’ve killed the nation state, or at least many of the most powerful ones. Then there’s just Russia, China and Japan, who’ll probably all have to be nuked.

  34. Canspeccy: “First, half the population doesn’t vote.”

    So what? When the United States was founded, only a tiny percentage of the population was even able to vote. Besides, voter participation rates have little to do with policy. Policy reflects the values of the culture at large.

    CanSpeccy: “Second, most of those who vote don’t have a clue what the election is supposed to be about.”

    This is just more whites-as-helpless-victims, conspiracy nonsense.

    CanSpeccy: “Third, whichever side wins, you’ll get the same basic policies dictated not by the people, but by whoever funds the election campaigns and makes the after office payoffs to the leading politicians.”

    According to you, “the people” are a bunch of easily manipulated fools who are barely intelligent enough to remember their own names or what year it is. If so, why would you want them dictating policy? Yet at the same time, you have had the effrontery to claim the vast majority of these “fools” vigorously oppose the state’s immigration policy. Which is it?

    If whites truly opposed the state’s current immigration policy, they would have worked to change it. The incontestable fact that efforts to change it have been unsuccessful shows implicitly that the majority still approve of it.

    CanSpeccy: “Why don’t you go away and read some history and come back in a few years when you have something useful to say without sounding so pompous.”

    Take your own advice. Maybe then you’d realize that white endorsement of racial and sexual equality has a very long track record. For example, in the United States, negroes were made the legal equals of whites immediately after the Civil War. This was done by white people, through their representatives, at a time when voter participation was very high (around 80%), and the country was virtually 100% white and Christian. It represented a 180 degree REVERSAL of what had been government policy up to that point, very hard to explain simply by pointing to campaign financing and spluttering about “payoffs”.

    • Replies: @CanSpeccy
  35. CanSpeccy says: • Website
    @Dr. Robert Morgan

    This is just more whites-as-helpless-victims, conspiracy nonsense.

    God, you’re clueless.

    Go and read Baghot (The English Constitution), for a start to your political education. Then you’ll have a better idea who decides policy, although things have changed a bit since the 1850’s. Then it was chiefly the man on the top of the Clapham omnibus (i.e., the top ranks of the civil service) who dictated policy. Now it’s mainly those who direct the corporate lobbyists.

    Besides, voter participation rates have little to do with policy. Policy reflects the values of the culture at large.

    Don’t be childish. Policy reflects the will of the elite. Of course the elite have to avoid insurrection, the yellow vests, etc., but they are generally more competent than Micron at handling popular discontent.

    According to you, “the people” are a bunch of easily manipulated fools

    Not fools, but ignorant like you, for sure, and subject to propaganda, bullying and as necessary punitive treatment by the elite. Hence as Hermann Goering put it:

    Why, of course, the people don’t want war. Why would some poor slob on a farm want to risk his life in a war when the best that he can get out of it is to come back to his farm in one piece? Naturally, the common people don’t want war; neither in Russia nor in England nor in America, nor for that matter in Germany. That is understood. But, after all, it is the leaders of the country who determine the policy and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy or a fascist dictatorship or a Parliament or a Communist dictatorship.

    Then in your total ignorance, apparently, of what what’s been happening the last few years in Europe you blithely state:

    If whites truly opposed the state’s current immigration policy, they would have worked to change it.

    How are they going to change it with traitors like Bliar and Thereason May, Merkel and Micron in charge. The Blair Government opened the gates to a flood of immigrants to, by their own contention, “rub the noses of the right in multiculturalism.” Yet for decades opinion surveys in Britain have shown 65-75% public opposition to immigration, which is to say a massive majority. Even the majority of immigrants are for restricting the immigrant influx.

    Maybe then you’d realize that white endorsement of racial and sexual equality has a very long track record.

    What’s that to do with the question of whether white people are in favor of their own replacement by people of alien race, religion and culture. You are the most dunderheaded self-hating idiot, if not a troll, that I have come across in years.

  36. CanSpeccy: “Policy reflects the will of the elite.”

    If that were always true, there’d still be kings. Also, it should be obvious that elites exist within a cultural context and must themselves conform to it.

    CanSpeccy: [quoting Goering] “Why, of course, the people don’t want war. … [I]t is the leaders of the country who determine the policy…”

    If they didn’t want war, they wouldn’t elect leaders who start wars. If they didn’t want war, they also wouldn’t fight. Most modern armies consist of volunteers; professional soldiers.

    Camspeccy: “How are they going to change it with traitors like Bliar and Thereason May, Merkel and Micron in charge.”

    In your fevered imagination, revolutionary sentiment is apparently at an all-time high, so it should be a simple matter for the people to rise up, just as they have done at so many times and places throughout history. But (needless to say) they won’t. They’ll keep voting the same people and policies back in.

    CanSpeccy: “What’s [white endorsement of racial and sexual equality] to do with the question of whether white people are in favor of their own replacement by people of alien race, religion and culture. ”

    As should be obvious to anyone except a complete buffoon such as yourself, if whites don’t believe the races differ – and in vast majority they quite obviously don’t, and aren’t shy about telling you so – then there’s no reason to be distressed about being replaced.

    The truth is, your sort of conspiracy nonsense is nothing but phony opposition, taking up space that should be occupied by real opposition such as that of Brenton Tarrant. It exists so that whatever revolutionary sentiment there is can be diverted into harmless channels. It exists so that the real, cultural cause of the ongoing white racial suicide can never be understood and addressed. That is the place of conspiracy nuts like you in the political ecology, and a large part of the reason why the white race seems likely to become extinct.

    • Replies: @CanSpeccy
  37. CanSpeccy says: • Website
    @Dr. Robert Morgan

    If that were always true, there’d still be kings.

    No. there was just a a change for autocracy to some kind of plutocracy when they chopped of the head of the king, as in England, for example.

    If they didn’t want war, they wouldn’t elect leaders who start wars. If they didn’t want war, they also wouldn’t fight. Most modern armies consist of volunteers; professional soldiers.

    Well we could go at this all day and night. But don’t you realize how naive you view is. People don’t have a real choice. “Seize the middle ground” is Tony Blair’s war cry. In other words all parties make essentially the same promises, then keep them or not as suits their purpose. Like “build a wall” of which so far Trump has built none at all.

    Or to consider something more important: every US president and every candidate for the presidency with possible a single exception have maintained the principle of “leaving all options on the table” which includes first use of nuclear weapons. So where’s the choice on that minor issue, not to mention all the others that folks might care about? There ain’t none.

    it should be a simple matter for the people to rise up, just as they have done at so many times and places throughout history.

    And how many peasant revolts have there been when the leaders didn’t end up on a gallows? And today your up against Homeland Security with how many bullets is it per US citizen. Oh and the state reads all your email and records all you phone calls, and monitors your online activity just to be sure of intercepting any plans for insurrection.

    As should be obvious to anyone except a complete buffoon such as yourself, if whites don’t believe the races differ – and in vast majority they quite obviously don’t, and aren’t shy about telling you so – then there’s no reason to be distressed about being replaced.

    Well let me say, since you are so insulting that I don’t wish to speak further with such a rude fucker, and stupid PhD. You remind me so much of Stephen Leacock the Canadina humorist who said PhD stands for Philled up. Sure applies to you. Unfortunately, your scull is full of mush.

  38. CanSpeccy: “Like “build a wall” of which so far Trump has built none at all.”

    The wall is a good example of why the issue is cultural, not the result of a conspiracy. Endless excuses are given for not building it (too expensive, won’t work, will cause too much environmental damage, will interfere with local jurisdictions, etc.), which of course is part of its charm for those who, like Trump, really don’t want a wall anyway, but a moment’s thought shows that calling for a wall in itself proves the lack of seriousness with which American whites take the problem of illegal immigration. The approximately 2000 mile long border with Mexico could be better protected by perhaps a hundred roving snipers who shoot to kill, and this at an infinitesimal fraction of the cost of a wall. Each sniper could be made responsible for a 20 mile stretch of border, upon which he could station himself at random, ever-changing locations. After a only a few illegal crossers are shot and killed, it’s overwhelmingly likely that attempted infiltrations would drop to close to zero. After all, would YOU want to cross the border illegally if you knew for a fact that there was even a 1 in 100 chance it would be the last thing you ever did? Thus, instead of billions for a wall, the problem could be made to disappear essentially for the cost of a few bullets.

    A simple solution like this is ruled out though by Christian ethics, which has so influenced Western culture that it’s considered outrageous; completely beyond the pale even by those who nominally are opposed to Christianity itself. When even non-Christians and anti-Christians subscribe to Christian ethics, then you know that Christianity’s cultural dominance is total.

  39. What is all this Tarrant nonsense about “fascist Mosley”?

    What has he or those who parrot actually studied, or even know, about the former Labour Minister, the Mosley Manifesto, the violent attacks on his followers, the Corporate State,the British Peace, Europe a Nation? What do they know about his humanitarian proposals regarding immigration?

    His lifelong opposition to murder – Amristar, Ireland, Hola, the OAS? His condemnation of Communist and Nazi crimes? His proposals for free speech and personal freedom? His books – Greater Britain, The Alternative, Right or Wrong?, My Life, &c.?

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Peter Brimelow Comments via RSS
PastClassics
What Was John McCain's True Wartime Record in Vietnam?
Are elite university admissions based on meritocracy and diversity as claimed?