The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 Washington Watcher Archive
Christchurch Massacre Spurs Tech Totalitarians
But They Have Enemies Trump Could Work With, If He Would Focus
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information


Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

See, earlier: Google vs. Trump: “The Good Censor” On Collision Course With The Patriot President

Needless to say, Journofa/ politicians are demanding more tech censorship following last week’s tragic shooting in Christchurch, New Zealand. The alleged killer, Brenton Tarrant, appears to have been a frequent 8chan user, he livestreamed his attack on Facebook, and his manifesto was quickly disseminated across a variety of platforms. So they must be shut down: “[T]he tech giants have a more profound responsibility than simply trying to censor offensive material after the event. They need to consider how the openness of their platforms allows the spread and reinforcement of racist hatred and violent ideologies,” editorialized the London Independent. [Tech giants must now use their power to fight racist hate online, The Independent, March 16, 2019]Big Tech censorship, combined with the rise of illiberal Cultural Marxist totalitarianism in the West’s intellectual elites, is the biggest threat to free speech, and immigration patriotism, in America.

It is imperative our politicians resist these calls to silence dissent. Rather than more tech censorship, we need less of it and we need our representatives to challenge Big Tech’s power.

Donald Trump Jr. apparently understands this. [Conservatives face a tough fight as Big Tech’s censorship expands, by Donald Trump Jr. , The Hill, March 17, 2019] But his father’s performance in an interview last week left much to be desired.

President Trump said Big Tech colluded with the Democrats against him in the 2016 election and that Republicans face a “tremendous disadvantage” in 2020 due to tech censorship and bias. He also acknowledged that patriots face terrible treatment by Twitter and expressed awareness of the numerous reports on tech censorship. But while Trump said “people are talking about breaking [tech giants] up,” he offered no serious plan of his own: “You fight it by just being good. You got to be really good. It’s much harder for a conservative Republican to win than it is for a liberal Democrat”. [Donald Trump Accuses Tech Giants of Colluding with Democrats, by Alexander Marlow, Matthew Boyle, Amanda House and Charlie Spiering, Breitbart, March 12, 2019]

“Just be good” is asinine and sends a disheartening message to Trump supporters. Big Tech does everything possible to silence conservative and Dissident Right viewpoints, a fact Trump acknowledges. He even knows Big Tech’s behavior affects elections. Yet, he just wants to “be good” in the face of this problem.

It’s not like Trump has no options in tackling tech censorship. Last fall, the administration had an executive order drafted that would have required federal agencies to “investigate/and or prosecute” tech giants for bias and censorship. But the White House backed off the plan, even though Trump had reportedly demanded an order on the matter, after it was leaked to the press. Since then, the White House has shown no signs of drafting a new executive order or legislation to deal with tech censorship.

But where Trump has disappointed, some Democratic presidential candidates show promise—because of their historic suspicion of corporate power. Three 2020 candidates have expressed a desire to challenge Big Tech power and force these corporate giants to better serve the American people.

Sen. Elizabeth Warren garnered much attention this month for her proposal to break up the tech giants: “Today’s big tech companies have too much power — too much power over our economy, our society, and our democracy. They’ve bulldozed competition, used our private information for profit, and tilted the playing field against everyone else. And in the process, they have hurt small businesses and stifled innovation,” Warren wrote in announcing her proposal. [Here’s how we can break up Big Tech, by Elizabeth Warren, Medium, March 8, 2019]

The Massachusetts senator’s primary focus on tech giants is their disproportionate control of the market and stifling of competition, not their censorship policies. But part of her plan may force Big Tech to better respect free speech. She proposes large tech services be classified as “platform utilities” and divided from one single owner. According to her plan as announced in Medium, “[p]latform utilities would be required to meet a standard of fair, reasonable, and nondiscriminatory dealing with users.”

That “nondiscriminatory dealing with users” part of her plan offers the possibility that Warren would crack down on censorship. Her proposal also empowers “federal regulators, State Attorneys General, or injured private parties” to sue tech giants that violate these rules. That potentially gives the victims of tech censorship the power to right their wrongs in court.

But of course this would be implemented by progressives. And anyone whose attended college know what that can mean.

Similarly, #MeToo’d Senator Al Franken (D.- MN) offered similar criticisms of tech power in 2017 op-ed and urged Congress to do something about it. But Franken also wanted Big Tech to do more to suppress “hate speech” and “misinformation.” State power was to be wielded to break up tech giants and make them more effective censors. [We must not let big tech threaten our security, freedoms and democracy, by Al Franken, The Guardian, November 8, 2017]

Warren herself has not expressed this opinion and she has previously stood up for free speech on college campuses, a rare opinion for a modern-day progressive. [Elizabeth Warren Says Campus Free Speech Means No Censorship or Violence, by Zaid Jilani, The Intercept, October 27, 2017]. But the rest of Warren’s party believes these corporations need to censor more. For instance, Democrats on House Energy and Commerce Committee announced last month that they plan to grill tech execs on why they haven’t done more to stamp out “hate speech and misinformation”. [Democrats vow Congress will ‘assert itself’ against tech, by Tony Romm, The Washington Post, February 26, 2019]

There are other exceptions to the party consensus though. Presidential candidates Andrew Yang and Rep. Tulsi Gabbard have both called for tech giants to protect free speech on their platforms [Tulsi Gabbard Attacks Facebook over Censorship, Defends Free Speech for ‘All Americans’, by Allum Bokhari, Breitbart, March 14, 2019]. Yang has a plan to do so by treating large tech platforms as public utilities. This would allow the government to regulate Twitter, Facebook, and others to ensure they protect free speech.

This plan appealing to some on the Dissident Right as it could address our main criticism of Big Tech: these corporations silence our speech and impose their political bias on their users.

Warren’s proposal could also have a positive effect. It would dismantle the incredible power of Big Tech and create market advantages for platforms that stand up for free speech. We may not have to worry so much about one platform’s censorship if there is an equally viable alternative.

In typical Conservative Inc. fashion, National Review editor Rich Lowry opposes Sen. Warren’s proposal. In a Politicocolumn, Lowry dismisses conservative concerns about Big Tech as simple distaste for the liberalism of tech execs and insists Google doesn’t do anything nefarious. [Don’t Break Up Big Tech, March 13, 2019] (He doesn’t disclose that National Review Institute receives donations from Google in his Politico column.) According to Lowry, Big Tech is an American success story and should be protected from government intervention.

Many Conservative Inc. types have bantered “muh free market” tropes for years to defend Big Tech’s power. Thankfully, several Republican politicians are different and have woken up to the threat of this insidious trend. Sen. Ted Cruz stood up for Sen. Warren when Facebook censored her ads and argued tech censorship threatens our democracy.

Cruz has grilled tech executives and experts in multiple Senate hearings on the censorship and bias exhibited by social media platforms. He has expressed interest in using antitrust laws to suppress Big Tech’s power [Ted Cruz: Use Antitrust Laws to Break ‘Massive Power’ of Tech Lords to ‘Subvert Our Democratic Process’, by Robert Kraychik, Breitbart, April 25, 2018] Cruz also stood up for Alex Jones when the Infowars host was banned by every major social media platform.

House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy has spoken out against tech censorship on numerous occasions and demanded tech execs testify before Congress on their political bias. [McCarthy: Google ‘controlling the internet’ in a way that hurts conservatives, by Ali Breland, The Hill, September 12, 2018] Other Republican lawmakers who have demanded a solution to tech censorship include Florida Rep. Matt Gaetz and Missouri Sen. Josh Hawley. [Rep. Matt Gaetz Slams Political Bias At Google, Urges Internal Investigation, by Allum Bokhari, Breitbart, December 11, 2018]

There’s both a spirit and serious ideas within the GOP to tackle tech censorship. Last October, the Watcher offered some ways that the President could address this serious issue. They are still relevant today.

Continue Calling Out Tech Censorship

Something as basic as Trump tweeting out criticism of Facebook and Google is actually remarkably effective. Tech giants are worried sick the President may target the industry and are wary of doing anything radical enough to draw his ire.…

Target Section 230

Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act is a sacred privilege for social media companies. This law protects Facebook, Twitter, and other platforms from liability over the material published on their websites. One of the reasons these services are granted this privilege is the Congressional finding, embodied in legislation, that they “offer a forum for a true diversity of political discourse.” [47 U.S. Code § 230 – Protection for private blocking and screening of offensive material] In contrast, newspapers are subject to libel actions over Letters to the Editor, because they are assumed to have exercised editorial judgement in publishing them.

Legislation amending Section 230 to explicitly state these companies may not engage in political discrimination would protect free expression for years to come.

In October, I wrote that “All Trump has to do is suggest the idea to allies like House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy to get this done”, which is no longer the case since the midterms.

The difference today is that the onus for pushing the president to do this lies with lawmakers like Sens. Cruz and Hawley rather than with Trump. Both Cruz and Hawley have called for Section 230 to be reexamined and utilized to protect free speech on social media platforms. There’s a chance that one of these senators may propose legislation to expand Section 230 to specifically require viewpoint neutrality for platforms that benefit from its protection.

In contrast, Trump’s recent Breitbart interview shows he is basically unaware of any idea to deal with tech censorship. This is why it is incumbent on prominent GOP politicians and Fox News hosts (Trump watches Fox News, right?) to suggest ideas to him.

All Trump has to do is tweet something about treating social media platforms as public utilities or mention section 230 to grab Big Tech’s attention.

And he must do something on this issue if he wants to be re-elected. “Being good” won’t save his supporters from being banned or his ads being blocked.

2020 is fast approaching. It’s time for the GOP and Trump to do something about Big Tech.

If they don’t do, Democrats will–and that action likely won’t help American patriots.

Washington Watcher [email him] is an anonymous source Inside The Beltway.

(Republished from VDare by permission of author or representative)
Hide 128 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. I would say tech totalitarianism is very eager to find things be spurred by.

  2. Free speech is the way to curb violence. If whites are not allowed to have a voice, then some whites will surely snap.

    • Replies: @SunBakedSuburb
  3. Trump wanted to go after Big Tech. Then he didn’t. Trump wanted to decamp from Syria. Then he didn’t. Did Trump change his mind or did somebody change it for him? This is not a rhetorical question. If Trump is not in charge of his Administration then who is? And why are we even discussing the policy preferences of presidential candidates? When they get the job they will do as they are instructed.

    Yeah. Trump could do something about Big Tech. But can he really?

  4. Hawker says:

    The only reason Warren and her ilk want to break up big tech is because their concern for maintaining market hegemony has held them back from going full “Liberals only” and their immense value means politicians can’t easily bribe or bully them into being more activist than they want to be.
    If Facebook and Twitter were all sliced up into regional communication spheres (or however you would break them up if you ever even thought that deeply into the subject) tomorrow, the Dems managing the split would pack the executive spots with their pet “venture activists”, and failing that would more easily be able to throw their weight at the scattered remnants to “combat hate speech.”
    The Dems have never put their “business principles” over their social agenda or their capacity to ram it through by any avenue, and are definitely not gonna start now. Identity politics is the only issue anyone cares about anymore, the corporations are increasingly beholden to progressive-globalist virtue-signaling, and anyone who thinks that letting the Dems go in and gerrymander the business landscape is gonna do anything but make the problem worse has accomplished what I thought was an impossibility: they made the market-worshipping lolbertariqn retards the rational, pragmatic, forward-thinking side in an argument (They’re right for all the wrong reasons, but then that just highlights how short-sighted and steeped in wishful-thinking your advocacy is, now doesn’t it?)

  5. Miggle says:

    It’s not only Internet giants. It’s true of all corporate media. Why are NYT and WaPo and Murdoch so big, so few, and so powerful? And they are just the ones that hit us in the face. There are many virtual monopolies. They are the powerful ones that tell our rulers how to rule.

    Do we need corporate giants? Does Boeing have to be as big as it is to build big planes? Do we need big planes? If so we need socialism, a government builder of big planes. But no, a corporation can grow without swallowing others.

    More to the point, was Boeing created by corporate mergers? Can’t a corporation grow big without eliminating others, and stifling the innovation that diverse competition would bring forth?

    There is one basic problem. Our courts are corrupt. No, I didn’t mean to say that.

    There is one basic problem. A court ruled that a corporation is a person.

    Because the most basic rule of all is that our rulers must be of below average intelligence, that court ruling was never reversed by legislation making it law that a corporation is not a person.

    That means a corporation can be the personal owner of stocks in another corporation, and so we have corporate “mergers”, one swallows up another, but doesn’t need to employ all the staff of another, because there would then be duplicate roles.

    So corporations swallowing up other corporations and becoming giants has the side benefit of keeping wages lower than they otherwise would be, except for a tiny few at the top of the pyramid, who get it all.

    Track down all past corporate merges and force them to break up again. Make them all equal in size, every piece, the central piece as well, equal in size to the rest.

    And legislate that a corporation is not a person and can’t own stocks and shares in any other corporation.

    • Replies: @Wally
    , @Sbaker
    , @TKK
  6. Let’s see if I have this right…

    Right-wing speech is equivalent to destructive, lethal action, and must therefore be suppressed, prosecuted, and punished.
    Left-wing destructive, violent action is equivalent to free speech, and must therefore be allowed, promoted and disseminated (e.g. under the new legal fiat “preemptive self-defense”).

    The government via its law enforcement and judicial systems upholds these two premises. But volumes could be written about how morally and logically defective they are, and the many evils that result. Meanwhile all branches of government are paralyzed into resistance to change anything.

    The conclusions to be drawn are as follows:
    Therefore our society is no longer structurally able to dispense justice.
    Therefore the current situation reduces to a calculus of raw power devoid of any pretense of jurisprudence or morality.
    Therefore otherwise normal avenues of change are permanently blocked.
    Therefore a hot civil war is the only recourse to correct the situation.

  7. El Dato says:

    It’s time for the GOP and Trump to do something about Big Tech.

    Nothing is gonna happen.


    Wondering why ‘Devin Nunes herp-face’ was trending online? Here’s the 411: House rep sues Twitter for all the rude stuff tweeted about him: Congresscritter seeks $250m for ‘defamation, neglience’

    “Fuck up Jack’s Shit House Now!” sounds better than “Whip Inflation Now!”

  8. Anonymous [AKA "FuckTrump"] says:

    The goal for anyone with a minimum self respect left should be to punish the obvious facilitators of the Israel Lobby’s – ie deep state – main goals. Forget the immigration, hbd red herrings.

    That means voting for the ones opposing intervention and not mentioning Iran. Unfortunately, the only ones with such an offering are Dems. Tulsi Gabbard and Yang are obvious choices. Even Bernie. I pray Ilhan Omar runs for president, so anti Israel lobby votes could be concentrated. That is the sad state of affairs. Praying to have a Somali Muslim -with more balls than the whole GOP establishment – running for POTUS.

    To anyone not paying attention, floppy Republicans have shown time and again that not only are unable to deliver on immigration, but also are an uber hawkish, more neocon version of Dems.

    Much has been said about Obama, but at least the man had the balls to ignore the neocons and not to invade Syria. Gelatinous Trump wasn’t even able to do that.

  9. That is why I like Cruz. Rather than delivering a bunch of knee-jerk corporate cheerleading or blanket condemnation, he actually thinks more than most of the people who get elected to office.

    If tech companies are going to protect users, they should protect against the targeting of ordinary individuals by name, which can be injurious to average individuals in many ways, with no benefit to the ordinary, targeted person, unlike with famous people who get rich via publicity, no matter how bad some of it is, albeit their family members sometimes don’t benefit financially. And they still have to deal with the sting of the meanness.

    In a better era, the media self-censored gossipy stuff about public figures when it was irrelevant to the public debate. Now, reporters try to make bank on every morsel of salacious gossip, turning the political debate into bread-and-circuses. Politicians should not have to waste so much of the taxpayers’ time, feeling like they need to defend their loved ones from needless BS.

    But much worse things are happening on the internet.

    You could take extreme cases, like the ISIS men in Morocco who recently murdered two, young, Danish hikers in the most heinous way, decapitating one of them on film and putting it on her mother’s FB page. You do not get more evil than that.

    Or, you could take the less extreme—but just as tragic—increase in the suicide rate for teenaged girls. If you’ve ever been a teenaged girl, you know that many of them are excruciatingly embarrassed by every little mean thing that is said to them.

    Magnify that by 10,000 by putting all of the unsupervised hallway bullies online, toruturing them with humiliating online comments that target them, personally, and that are likely echoed by peers at school. Granted, many of the online harassers probably use coded language that only those in their circle of peers understand. The tech companies probably can’t design algorithms sensitive enough to translate every indirect, under-the-radar taunt.

    Ordinary adults have the added burden of needing to keep a roof over their heads in a brutal-cubed labor market with mass-scale underemployment. When anything in the world can be said about them online, fragile livelihoods can be on the line, so it is not just a matter of dodging bully kids in the hallway.

    At first, people embraced the internet wholeheartedly, not really seeing the full gamut of possible bad outcomes. It is possible that the tech wizards didn’t either, although it looks like they are trying to capitalize on anything and everything, especially our Fourth Amendment privacy.

    I believe the CEOs when they indicate that they, too, were shocked that people would post videos of murders online, not for purposes of political commentary, hoping to reduce crime rates or to warn people of danger, but just to bask in the gruesomeness. Some people are doing it.

    It is sick, but not really new. Back in the Seventies and Eighties, there were “True Crime” magazines, positioned high on the shelves of supermarkets, out of the reach of children. The new part is the non-centralized dissemination.

    The new part is the targeting and mocking of ordinary individuals by name and by image, broadcast around the world.

    But there are gray areas.

    There are forms of serious political speech that involve letting the public know about major, serious, real violent crime in no uncertain terms. It can be a disservice to sugar-coat it. People are more cautious when informed about the full extent of human evil. If you have lived in safe neighborhoods, it is easy to underestimate the danger.

    I believe CEOs were shocked about the ways in which a few people would use the internet for evil purposes, but I do not believe they lack control over the targeting of individuals. They have the option to hire humans to design protective algorithms, or even (shock) to hire humans to sift through posts by hand, looking for the most abusive stuff that is non-political and, thus, not constitutionally protected.

    But if it is someone’s self-constructed social media page, they might find that action to be a corporate invasion of their Fourth Amendment rights. Maybe, the 4th does not even apply to public sites. But it might apply to all of this tracking of every online move, even behind the closed doors of our homes, in addition to microphones and other app invasions that many people do not want and did not understand.

    Many people in a nation founded on liberty do not want apps recording them in their homes, nor marketers knowing every detail of their financial lives in the service of more efficient shoe-buying. Tech companies have to be able to make money, but they are taking it too far.

    It is sort of like the lopsided privacy-loss trade-off that politicans and celebrites make for fame & fortune, v/s the trade-off made by increasingly underemployed American citizens who have not gotten much out of this erosion of basic liberties.

    It is a lose / lose in some ways. We have lost privacy. Though tech giants are regarded as “American” companies, they do not employ many Americans. Foreign nationals, working for tech giants in the United States, do not count as a consolation for the losses experienced by Americans.

    That is not to say the products lack intrinsic value. We love a lot of things about mobile computing, but we are not being treated like customers, even though we are paying a lot for these things, not just hundreds upon hundreds over the span of 2-year contracts. We are paying disproportionately for devices that Chinese consumers buy for $35. We are also paying for the cellular service.

    We are not just “users.”

    Americans invented the tech, with the help of a chunk of taxpayer money, but foreign nationals get most of the jobs and most of the bargains on devices.

    We are paying for it in an era when rent consumes over half of our monthly income.

    We are paying to be a vessel for the robotic cold callers that are replacing salespeople in a country where 95 million citizens between the ages of 16 and 65 are sidelined from the labor market, and the average “employed” person works only part time.

    We are paying to help them displace us with first mass waves of immigrants, including many working for the tech companies, and with now robotic cold callers.

    We are no longer just paying for TV service that is interrupted by the occasional cluster of non-targeted and non-privacy-invading ads; we are paying for tech companies (and marketers via tech companies) to track our every jaunt to the store and our last bank account transaction. We, the customers reclassified as “users,” are paying them for the privilege of a constant stream of strategic advertising.

    Tech people say it is a choice, and sometimes, it is an explicit choice, with a box asking you for permission to surveil for advertising purposes. Sometimes, you want to support the site, so you click on things. Occasionally, you are really interested in some peddled product. But they have integrated AI into evething so much that the choice aspect is often vague.

    Non-technical people were dazzled at first by the ease of use and the expanded visual and other capabilities of mobile devices. We did not think about all of the more & less serious ramifications. No even marginally normal person, including the tech-giant people, would think about all of the horrific ways in which some people are using the internet, like committing murder online and bragging about it, in addition to leaving mocking comments for their loved ones to see.

    But that is not what the tech giants are focusing on.

    They are not focusing on protecting individuals from harm to the extent that it is possible in the Wild West of the internet. They are focusing on protecting select groups from the constitutionally-protected, political speech of select individuals.

  10. APilgrim says:

    Meanwhile, from The Religion of Peace …

    ‘ISIS Beheads 50 Yazidi Sex Slaves as Parting Gift’, NEWS, By Clarion Project, Published February 25, 2019,

    ‘THE PERSECUTION OF CHRISTIAN WOMEN’, Jack Kerwick, March 18, 2019,

    May God BLESS & KEEP Brenton Harrison Tarrant, in the palm of his hand.

  11. APilgrim says:

    List of Killings in the Name of Islam: Last 30 Days,

    This is part of the list of killings in the name of Islam maintained by Most of these incidents are terror attacks. A handful are honor killings or Sharia executions.
    During this time period, there were 100 Islamic attacks in 22 countries, in which 686 people were killed and 736 injured.

    May God BLESS and KEEP Brenton Harrison Tarrant, in the palm of his hand.

    • Replies: @Sbaker
  12. APilgrim says:

    Killing a: Muhammadan, Monopolist, or Socialist is an act of kindness, patriotic duty, justice, and Christian Service.

    May God Bless & Keep, Brenton Harrison Tarrant, in the palm of his hand.

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
  13. Amon says:

    You can’t ban racist content online without shutting down the entire liberal/ far left part of the internet.

  14. Z-man says:

    But They Have Enemies Trump Could Work With, If He Would Focus

    How can he possibly focus? He has that dopey daughter and her weird husband tugging at him in different directions. He’s been infested with NEOCONS in his inner national security circle and he has the Republi’tard cucks he has to deal with in Congress.
    You gotta hope he’s getting people like Pat Buchanan and Tucker Carlson in his ear.

  15. Cowboy says:

    Just as how shortly after the Tree of Life Psyop in Philadelpia there was a flood of new gun control and anti-semitism legislation, so after Christchurch we will see a flood of new gun control and islamophobia legislation.

    What people need to understand, in both cases they originate with the jews in Israel, and are for the benefit of these same people.

    The Jews in Israel throw back any moslems, arabs or blacks trying to get into occupied Palestine, but we all know they force every other country to accept these same invaders. In this sense, the moslems and blacks are invading hordes sent by hypocrite Jews, so they are protected by Talmudic law.

    Control of the worlds tech and social media have been brought under jewish control, mostly out of Israel. Brendon O’Connell has completely exposed operation Talpiot.

    For white people, it doesn’t matter if it is hate speech legislation, “terror legislation”, anti-semitism legislation, islamophobia legislation, or even LGBQ legislation. It all originates in Israel and is part of the same ancient conspiracy. It matters not if it is a Cruz, Cortez, Omar or Feinstein who are the talking head of the moment. They are all owned by the same people.

  16. It’s just more problem, solution. has done good analysis of the event. I do hope the best people begin to occupy the commanding heights of human civilization, for the sake of us all and our earthly home. is essential in creating the elevation of truth and open debate. Thanks

  17. It is pretty absurd, that people in english speaking world claim the perpetrator listened to German folk music. This was not German music in his car, it sounded like Slavic, and bit like Yiddish.
    I read the guy’s family emigrated from Israel to Australia.

    • Replies: @Whitewolf
    , @Wizard of Oz
  18. neutral says:

    If Trump is not in charge of his Administration then who is?

    The same people that are behind every other president, the international jew and their lackeys.

    Trump could do something about Big Tech. But can he really?

    No, see the answer above.

  19. Let’s see, the “alleged killer” is a perfectly genuine terrorist, who put his manifesto online in which he announced that his desire was to terrorise “invaders”, that is, non white people. He also livestreamed his massacre of civilians praying. After this, how exactly is he either “alleged” or merely a “killer”?

    Oh, scratch that. He isn’t just a “killer” – to the kind of person his rampage was aimed at, he’s a hero. It has not escaped anyone’s attention that

    1. His claims – that non white people in white majority countries are “invaders” – is exactly what the majority of commenters of those “alt right dissident” websites loudly proclaim. This is even when those “invaders” are in countries like Australia or Amerikastan where the white majority came about as the result of the genocidal extermination of the native population, but don’t let irony distract you.

    2. That the white racist commentariat on 8 Chan egged him on in his rampage. Let’s say ISIS was permitted to have a website where it could openly recruit its members, preach its ideology, and discuss attacks. Would that come under “dissent”?

    3. held off even mentioning the massacre until it found some way of rallying its racist troops behind its faux reduction of the massacre into one of “censorship”.

    None of this, of course, is surprising in the least.

  20. @Cowboy

    Please don’t pretend that you care about the Palestinians. Your alleged “sympathy” for them is not due to any anti imperialist impulse. You and your ilk hate the Palestinians just as much as you do Jews. It’s just that you can conveniently blame the Jews for your problems, not the Palestinians, so you pretend to take their side. In reality, you merely poison the Palestinian cause with your anti Jewish animus. You are de facto allies of the zionists because you give ammunition to their claim that all support for Palestine is racist. A lot of you are even zionists spreading black propaganda. Some of the more intelligent of you even dimly realise it.

    • Replies: @aspnaz
    , @Alden
  21. “The Great Replacement” is exactly what it is.

  22. aspnaz says:

    It always amazes me how those journalists who support “free speech” suddenly turn into journalists who support “responsible free speech”. The contradiction just reveals that the journalist has not thought very hard about free speech and is actually following the crowd – probably following the directives of the boss. Do we really need such weak kneed people giving us guidance?

    The kiwis are not only remote – parochial thinking – but are obviously scared that they have been thrown into the limelight. It was easier to support bad things when the USA was bombing Yemen, now it is very near to home. No problem, they are a 1.5 world (not first, not second) country, so they are hanging in there and doing what they think is right, although they are sadly mistaken.

    The one thing they do have is a great bunch of residents: I would bet there are not many white countries out there containing a more friendly and genuine bunch of people. So give them a break.

  23. Cowboy says:

    Simultaneously there were police terrorism exercises going on. The only way this psyop could be more crass would be if they found Tarrant’s passport in the mosque.

    “The police said a special armed tactical unit arrived at Al Noor Mosque four minutes after the first officers, or 10 minutes after the initial emergency call.

    Mr. Cahill said it normally would have taken longer, with team members summoned to a police station to suit up. On Friday, though, they happened to be in a training session in the city center and wearing their gear, he said.

    • Replies: @Alden
  24. onebornfree says: • Website

    Fake NZ Mosque Massacre Video?

    I would suggest that the reason the shooter vid is now banned is because it is most likely a fake – and its creators don’t want any further close examination of it.

    See: “The New Zealand Mosque Mass Shooting Psyop Scam. Update [2] 031819: “Magically disappearing cartridges in NEW ZEALAND Hoax “ :

    There are many more strange aberrations contained in the massacre video that lead to the conclusion that it is a fake, nothing more than a reasonably well made video game graphic.

    And even saying that much ignores the many strange off camera events reportedly surrounding this alleged event, such as simultaneously occurring, close by, police emergency response exercises.

    Bottom line: it a mistake to conclude at this point in time that the event actually occurred as we’re told, or even that it occurred at all.

    Regards onebornfree.

    • Replies: @onebornfree
    , @Brabantian
  25. neutral says:
    @Fiendly Neighbourhood Terrorist

    If you for one second think you are going to convince people that a white killing non whites invading his land is equivalent to a non white attacking whites in their own land, then you are both an utter idiot and evil.

    Your entire premise is based on the thinking that non whites have the right to enter white lands as they see fit and call it their own. Well they don’t, to accept this premise is to accept white genocide because ultimately that is where your ideology leads to.

    We are long past this world where some high brow wannabe like you who watches SNL, reads the Guardian, the BBC and the other usual shit, thinks everything they declare is normal and should be accepted as rational, well its not! One way or the other mass blood letting will occur, either because the world will become completely non white (and the global chaos this will entail) or white people will take their lands back, your ivory tower ideology cannot work any other way.

  26. @APilgrim

    According to your principles it would hypocritical of you, assuming you are American [otherwise mutandis], to complain if some person of Native American descent shot and killed members of your family of all ages who were in a church for wedding, baptism, funeral or regular service.

    • Replies: @Alden
  27. aspnaz says:
    @Fiendly Neighbourhood Terrorist

    What you are saying is that it is racist to recognize a victim. You are obviously complicit in the murder of Palestinian women and their children. As someone who supports murder, why should we care what you think? The end of this crime will be realized when the new Hitler returns and knocks on your door or Jesus returns and forgives you: looking at history, I’m betting on the former.

  28. aspnaz says:
    @Fiendly Neighbourhood Terrorist

    What are you saying? It sounds like you are pretending that obeying the law is breaking the law. All those websites you mention obey the law. If you want state-sanctioned thought then vote for it, otherwise STFU.

    The massacre hit the wrong people: the innocents living their lives are not the target, the rich people who fund and support this shit should be the target, but they are too hard to hit, so the youths hit the low hanging fruit. The rich have earned their hit, the poor are the innocents with no power. Although I should say that violence is not the answer: change the law to make it compulsory to crucify two oligarchs at every cross roads is the way to go – it’s legal!

  29. @Monotonous Languor

    A war needs the strongest order of motivations to be engaged in by the side not holding the upper hand.
    Do you think the lack of pluralism in education and information, and the deplatforming and banning of some cherished contrarian characters, may provide motivation of that order?
    I don’t.

  30. Alden says:
    @Fiendly Neighbourhood Terrorist

    What genocide? There are so many more Mexican and S American Indians they’re pouring over the border into the US and even going to Canada because there is just too many of them at home.

    In 1,500 AD there were about 1 million Indians in the present US. Now there are about 3 million. That’s not genocide at all.

    Q. Why do morons believe educational and MSM propaganda?

    A. Because they are not just morons but empty vessels into which any nonsense can be poured.

  31. onebornfree says: • Website

    [By Scott Bennett, Ph.D. (ABD)Former U.S. Army Psychological Operations Officer and State Department Counterterrorism Contractor:]


    Now let me first start out by saying that after thoroughly examining the 17 minute video of the shooter frame-by-frame, and after applying deductive reasoning in the forensic analysis, I am convinced this was a false-flag event for the following reasons:

    No bullet holes or shattered wood or glass or clouds of sheet rock or exploding plaster or cement can be observed or heard as the guns are firing into them and the victims. This is possible only when no solid projectile is fired from the muzzle, which means no solid bullets were fired into the walls, doors, windows, or victims bodies—only the concussion of air—which means either blanks or paint or gas or other non-solid projectiles were fired from the guns. This means, essentially, nothing solid impacted the victims bodies, therefore no physical damage resulted, which means no living person was lethally wounded or killed by an outside force. It’s simple physics, which Newton’s law establishes in the theorem:……”:

    Regard, onebornfree

  32. Alden says:
    @Fiendly Neighbourhood Terrorist

    We get it. You hate White people. You hate us. You think your freshman year
    evil White people studies lectures are something we’ve never heard. You think you’re a genius for remembering what you learned in your Hate Whitey college courses

    We went through the same school and college system you did. We’ve heard it all a gazillion times.

    Blah blah Whites blah blah are blah blah the most blah blah evil people blah blah in the world blah blah

    You sound like every Jewish instructor of Stupidity Studies in every college in the country.

    Note I don’t say professor

    • Replies: @Cowboy
  33. @Anonymous

    Much has been said about Obama, but at least the man had the balls to ignore the neocons and not to invade Syria. Gelatinous Trump wasn’t even able to do that.

    There’s a lot of retard here. The troops Trump pulled out from Syria and the troops Trump’s leaving in Syria, under whose administration were they put in Syria? We could also discuss Obama’s decision to support al Qaeda in Syria, support being financial, military, intelligence, etc. Remember al Qaeda? The ones we were attacked by and the ones slaughtering people around the world?

    I don’t know if this is irony but – imagine you join the army in 2014. Hello Ft Leonard Wood where Staff Sergeant I Wrestle Alligators introduces you to your battle buddy Fred. After 13 weeks or so, you and your Battle Buddy Fred have graduated Basic and AIT and have one night left before finishing up your Combat Engineer training and you finally get your duty station orders. You, being a dumbass who joined under Obama, get orders to Camp Fuck This in Afghanistan to fight al Qaeda, Fred being less of a dumbass gets set to Camp What The Fuck in Syria to support al Qaeda.

    • Agree: Sbaker
    • Replies: @El Dato
  34. @onebornfree

    There’s more retard in that read than the previews read I responded to.

    • Replies: @VagabondTheElder
  35. Wally says:


    No worries, your beloved AOC is the darling of the tech “corporations”.

  36. Agent76 says:

    MARCH 16, 2019 Christchurch Terrorist Attack: Many Unanswered Questions Remain

    The primary suspect in this anti-Muslim terrorist attack is said to 28 year old Brenton Harrison Tarrant (image, left), an Australian citizen from New South Wales.

    Mar 17, 2019 HIDING THE EVIDENCE: New Zealand Gladio-Style Black Op

    Guys, as I was uploading this report, Tweet (video) was brought to my attention, and it’s an absolute jaw-dropper. WATCH the spent shells vanish into thin air without ever hitting the ground.

    • Agree: Alfred
  37. Alden says:
    @Wizard of Oz

    Supposedly Tarrant’s family were Israeli immigrants; no idea if it’s true or not.

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
  38. Wally says:
    @Fiendly Neighbourhood Terrorist

    “Amerikastan where the white majority came about as the result of the genocidal extermination of the native population”

    Proof? Nope.

    What “genocide” would that be? Fake “native American Indians” (migrant Asians) are everywhere.

    Stone-age Europeans were the first to set foot on North America, beating American Indians by some 10,000 years, new archaeological evidence :
    also of interest:
    Ancient Egyptians were European:

  39. Alden says:

    That training session does seem too much of a coincidence the cops were all prepared

    Training sessions happen all the time.There was a training event in Los Angeles this past weekend. Weekend because civic center is empty It was on the news. Cops running around the city hall and the county building

    But no terror events. Maybe because Christian services are Sunday morning when the civic center is most empty and suitable for training.

    If there’s a both a conveniently located training event on a Saturday morning near a synagogue or Friday afternoon near a Mosque we’ll know it’s a false flag event.

    Late Friday afternoon is probably the worst time for a training event . What department schedules them for the busiest traffic of the week? That’s what makes the New Zealand mosque slaughter suspicions

    • Replies: @Cowboy
  40. Sbaker says:

    Here says the islamophile.
    Here says I, not based on some simpleton from Somalia, but based on historical aspects of this violent political movement according to MO’s tenets for conquest:

    The Qu’ran was written by one man, Mohammad, and his word is law. Wherever there is a seeming contradiction in the Qu’ran, what Mohammad said later always supercedes what he said earlier. Thus, the Qu’ran’s earlier peaceful passages are abrogated by later violent passages on jihad.
    It is the religious duty of every Muslim to institute Shari’a — the Law of Allah — worldwide.
    Unlike Christianity that emphasizes truthfulness, Muslims are allowed to deceive (lie to) non-Muslims if doing so protects and helps Islam. This is called the principle of Taqiyya.

  41. Sbaker says:

    Shocking to know that the Muslim pigs would stoop so low as to lie. Obviously the hundred plus soft target mass murders they have committed since 911 were simply sport killings.

  42. Sbaker says:

    Finally, a voice of someone that is not an islamophile or a Muslim. How many Muslims post to this site? If only that info were available…

  43. Agent76 says:

    Mar 19, 2019 Children Make Perfect Propaganda Props #PropagandaWatch

    Need to push through a propaganda campaign to utterly transform society? Want people to not only accept but actively embrace their own impoverishment? Well just get yourself some youthful true believers to do your propagandizing for you!

  44. Sbaker says:

    Quick tip for you. Some corporations are big. Is big a crime? Do corporations murder significant numbers of people or does Democide do the dirty work? Do corporations lead to wealth for nations; do they raise all boat Sank? More than 100 million people were killed in the 20th century, all at the hands of monolithic governments. The atheist leaders were far the worst–Mao, Stalin, Lenin, and yes, even the socialist Nazi.

  45. onebornfree says: • Website

    Washingon Watcher say: “But where Trump has disappointed, some Democratic presidential candidates show promise—because of their historic suspicion of corporate power. Three 2020 candidates have expressed a desire to challenge Big Tech power and force these corporate giants to better serve the American people.”

    ” to better serve the American people.” Yeah right! In your dreams!

    This just in:

    1] Warren, Yang, Franken and Gabbard are, like AOC, more or less full on big government/commie retards!

    2] Trump is just a slightly watered down version of the same – a lover of big, unconstitutional government that enriches him/themselves and the rest of the scumbags. A full on fraud, and he’s been that from the beginning to anyone with half a brain whose’ had their eyes even half way open:

    3] Amazon, Google, YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, Apple, Microsoft plus [obviously] all of the US MSM print and cable TV network inc.s, are full on government owned/controlled operations [via the CIA, NSA, DARPA etc.], laughing at us all from behind a [very] thin veil falsely labelled “private corporations”, which means that any call to break them up [or whatever] is merely a stupidly naive plea for the government to regulate/control itself. Like that’s gonna work! 🙂

    For example see: AMAZON: The Biggest Joint CIA-Corporate Covert Operation in U.S. History


    Although there’s really nothing that great about the US constitution outside of the Bill of Rights, getting rid of the CIA, NSA, DARPA , plus all the rest of the unconstitutional tentacles of government [ eg the Fed, IRS] , and shrinking the federal government down to its original functions and limits, although far from being a perfect solution, would at least get rid of a large part of the problem [government interference], and, who knows, maybe an effective way to keep it to its original size and limited function could be found – seeing as how the Bill of Rights has obviously completely failed to limit the growth and power of the federal government to date.

    Or maybe even go beyond the failed constitution, say back to the Articles of Confederation- or even beyond that, to a complete dissolution of the entire US federal government.

    But there’s no politician or private individual on the horizon thinking anywhere even close to those lines as far as I can see – and in the recent past, not even Ron Paul came close to promoting such a radical agenda.

    And so it goes……

    Regards, onebornfree

  46. Alden says:
    @Fiendly Neighbourhood Terrorist

    You’ve never been outside the biggest cities in America have you? There are Indians and Indian reservations all over the country will millions of Indians and part Indians.

    Just get on the main northern east west highway, I 80 you’ll drive through hundreds of rezes. Then drive Florida to San Diego ca hundreds of rezes . Many of them are bigger than France.

    Don’t you have a 9th rate community college class to teach? Or an anti-fa demonstration to attend?

    • Replies: @jeff stryker
  47. Cowboy says:

    Thanks for that [257]. Thats the only Anon I look for.

    I couldn’t understand what he was blathering on about, so I just skipped the rest.

    I agree these people don’t deserve to be called “professors” or “scientists” any more. In reality they are kommisars and the close family of the elite party members. Boondogles like Tesla, 737-Max, F35, Littoral Combat ship, Challenger and the Bullet train from Fresno to Fresno show how debased America has become. American manufacturing and engineering prowess have become the laughing stock of the planet.

    • Replies: @Alden
  48. @Fiendly Neighbourhood Terrorist


    Technically, Pakistani and Bangladeshi immigrants to the US are also invaders. They are living on Native American land as willingly as whites, blacks or Asians.

    • Replies: @Alden
  49. @Alden

    Virtually every white American whose family has been in the US for more than 100 years has Native American ancestry to some degree.

    • Replies: @Alden
    , @Reg Cæsar
    , @Alden
  50. peterAUS says:
    @Monotonous Languor

    Not yet there but very close.

    The next US Presidential election will be a very good indicator of the timeframe.

    As it goes, my take: most likely in a couple of years, tops, we’ll be in that stage.

  51. Alden says:
    @jeff stryker

    A lot of people claim that. DNA can prove or disprove. I knew a dot Indian immigrant who assumed every old American was part amer Indian.

    • Replies: @jeff stryker
  52. @Fiendly Neighbourhood Terrorist

    The MSM has and is constantly promoting the mass murderous wars of the governing politicians and publicising their justifications and live streaming their grand violence on all their channels via embedded reporters and … need I go on? What’s your actual complaint? Just working for the MSM to squeeze their alt-media competition from all portals. Why don’t you call on them to de-platform all those calling for war on Iran? Or do you think that will be a non-violent war? Like perhaps the ones in Panama, Iraq, Libya, etc. Get lost government stooge!

  53. Alden says:

    Thank you. Let’s not get started on the train from nowhere to nowhere that would just duplicate the existing Amtrak train and bus system that gets to every tiny village in the state

    Newsom took a look at the gazillion dollar budget and stopped the nowhere to nowhere train. For that alone I’ll vote for him again.

  54. Alden says:
    @jeff stryker

    All immigrants are invaders including the Mexicans whose ancestors were so unfortunate to live in the south side of the US Mex border.

  55. Anyone that really believes establishment Republicans or Democrats care about free speech needs their head examined. Keep in ming GOP as well as Dems are passing anti-BDS laws left and right, as well as passing legislation equating criticism of Israel as hate speech or antisemitism.

    There are very few standing up for free speech nowadays. Most of the pols are just puppets of Wall St donors, Big Tech donors, pro-Israel donors, war machine donors., they do not make decisions. They will do what the paymasters tell them to do.

    Brenton Tarrant is a mercenary, probably working for Israel, US, or both. The info about him going to Turkey, and his thoughts on Erdogan, right around the time of the attempted coup, is pretty telling.

    • Replies: @anon
    , @TKK
  56. Priss Factor [AKA "Asagirian"] says: • Website

    White nationalism is a reaction to Jewish Imperialism that created Clash of Civilizations between white world and Muslim world. If not for Jewish globalist power, whites would be in white lands and Muslims would be in Muslim lands. But Jews make whites invade Muslim lands and make Muslims barge into white lands.

    We need to ban Zionist polemics and globo-homo imperialist screeds that call for More Wars for Israel. We need to remove all hateful Jewish globalists from control of MSM.

  57. If only Candace Owens had been banned long ago, none of this would have happened. That poor young white man was radicalized by Candace and it’s all her fault. She preaches hate and violence and revolution and she should not be allowed to promote hate in this way. If only there had been some kind of intervention. If only I could have gotten to this young man to tell him, “Candace is not the way. She is leading you astray. Her calls for violent overthrow will only result in misery.”

  58. @Alden


    No South Asian in the US would have the capacity of caring enough about the history of the US or its white founders to form such an assumption.

  59. Agent76 says:

    Aug 8, 2017 How NSA Tracks You

    William “Bill” Binney, former NSA technical director on how NSA track you. From the SHA2017 conference in Netherlands.

    What is Metadata?

    This short video, will explain what Metadata is and why it’s important to businesses and government’s.

  60. Anonymous[238] • Disclaimer says:

    It’s not like Trump has no options in tackling tech censorship. Last fall, the administration had an executive order drafted that would have required federal agencies to “investigate/and or prosecute” tech giants for bias and censorship. But the White House backed off the plan, even though Trump had reportedly demanded an order on the matter, after it was leaked to the press. Since then, the White House has shown no signs of drafting a new executive order or legislation to deal with tech censorship.

    He’s either a moron or a traitor. Virtually every pro-Trump voice on the internet has been suppressed in some way while he’s done fuck-all besides a few whiny Tweets.

  61. anon[253] • Disclaimer says:

    How thoughtful of the judge at Tarrant’s hearing to have the perp’s face pixelated “for his own protection.”
    One must assume Tarrant’s identity is being hidden from fellow inmates?
    Aren’t they the only people , in Tarrant’s immediate future, who will come in contact w/ him and might seek to do him harm??

  62. Priss Factor [AKA "Asagirian"] says: • Website

    Notice there is zero sympathy for all those Muslims killed by US military and NATO in Muslim lands. Muslims count ONLY WHEN they step into Western nations.

    Behind the COC or Clash of Civilizations is the Jewish Factor. Paradoxically, in order for the Jewish-controlled West to keep smashing the Muslim World, it has to profess sympathy for the Muslim World. It’s like the US had to yammering nonsense about ‘saving Vietnamese’ in order to keep killing Vietnamese.

    What the West is doing in the Middle East/Muslim World is imperialism. It is invasion and war-mongering(and destruction of millions via sanctions). It is wrong, indeed evil, and deserves condemnation. So, how does the West get away with this? By letting tons of Muslims into the US, EU, Canada, and Australia as a gesture of ‘compassion’ and ‘tolerance’. And the Jew-run media run so many happy stories of how desperate Muslims are finding new lives in the compassionate West without ever mentioning that the Middle East is all messed up due to Wars for Israel. “You see, we care so very much about these poor poor Muslims.” That is used as moral cover for the West to keep intervening in the Middle East, mostly for the sake of Israel.

    If the New Zealand bitch-leader really cares about Muslim lives, why didn’t she ever rail against Zionist Wars for Israel?

    Jews tribalize/privatize the gains in the Middle East and universalize/socialize the costs in the Middle East. Israel gains so much by the destruction of its rivals and demographic emptying of nations like Syria and Iraq.
    But what is to be done about all those refugees? Well, Israel isn’t gonna take any. Just push them to the West(and even Japan) and admonish for the world for its lack of compassion in its failure to take in even more refugees. So, Jewish power turns the Middle East into a hell, but then beats its chest self-righteously as the moral champion of Muslim refugees. The people who cause the most harm to Muslims make the most noises as the dearest friend of Muslims. Notice how Jews never talk about how it was criminal to turn Muslims into refugees in the first place.

    Jewish globalist power is total vermin.

  63. muslims terrorism is beneficial because:
    Christians are exterminated.
    Terror causes hatred of muslims.
    Justifies police state controls.
    Creates sympathy for Israel.
    Justifies proxy wars for Israel.
    Causes the muslim invasion of Europe.

    It’s all good!

  64. Peredur says:

    Jim Fetzer’s blog has an article that includes a video which may be the video that was banned in New Zealand. I haven’t had time to find out for sure. The video shows spent shell casings emerging from a gun, flying up and arcing down towards the ground, falling towards the ground/pavement, and then disappearing before they reach the ground. In other words, one would expect to see the shell casings accumulating on the ground, but they don’t.

    There have been so many questionable mass casualty events in recent years that one starts to lose interest. I believe that essentially every high-profile mass casualty “attack” in the past ten years or so has been mostly fake. It is possible that some people die in these events, but most of the reported deaths are fake, in my opinion.

    Unfortunately, it is getting increasingly difficult to find legitimate analysis of these events on the web. There used to be channels on YouTube that would always have legitimate skeptical analysis, but they are all gone now. Some pop up now and then, of course.

  65. @jeff stryker

    Virtually every white American whose family has been in the US for more than 100 years has Native American ancestry to some degree.

    That’s not even close to being true. (Unless you uncapitalize “Native”.) Even 200 years doesn’t work that way.

    This is especially true of Puritan-stock Yankees. But even in other areas, eg French Canadians or Scots-Irish, the mixed marriages either lived with the Indians or moved to the frontier. There wasn’t that much effect on the white population. It was unpopular and discouraged.

    My dad’s people just missed the Mayflower, yet I’ve spent 20 years searching for an Indian ancestor. I haven’t found any.

    • Replies: @Alden
  66. Cowboy says:

    There weren’t just excercises going on, they were “deadly SAS sharp shooter” exercises:

    NZSAS soldiers in Christchurch for snipers event responded to mosque terror attack

    Some of the world’s most deadly sharpshooters were in Christchurch when New Zealand’s worst ever terror attack unfolded on Friday, with NZSAS taking to the streets to help hunt the rampaging mosque shooter.

    Snipers from the New Zealand military, as well as professional snipers from Australia and Asian countries, had been at the Defence Force shooting range at West Melton, 25kms west of the city, the Herald has been told.

    When the massacre unfolded, they were sprung into action and understood to have been granted special powers to take up arms in order to protect the public.

    NZSAS soldiers were photographed with weapons and balaclavas masking their face near the Al Noor Mosque by Hagley Park where a gunman stormed Friday prayer and shot dead more than 40 people.

    One photograph, which has appeared on social media, appears to show an NZSAS soldier with an army sniper rifle or designated marksman weapon outside the Deans Ave mosque.

    From the way this “terrorist” attack unfolded it is clear it had to be a professions SAS style sniper. Reports are that he had standard issue weapons and armor. He was clearly firing his AR15 in automatic mode, not semiautomatic.

    Nothing to see here, move along.

    • Replies: @Cowboy
  67. TKK says:

    There is one basic problem. A court ruled that a corporation is a person.

    Exactly right. Not sure why the nutters have gone full retard on your correct legal analysis. The Citizens United case shoe horned in Obama Care.

    It grants corporations- greedy parasites who pay no taxes- the same rights as a person. But, there is no one to hold accountable because they hide behind the prime doctrine that drives a corporation: maximize profits for the shareholders.

    In American, corporate gains are privatized and their losses socialized- absorbed by the middle class chumps, i.e. the 2008 collapse

    Should they have the same protection of law as a person, who the government crushes like a gnat and CEOs run corporations into the ground and sail away with 100 million golden parachute- whose liable? Only the tax payers.

    • Replies: @anonymous
  68. TKK says:

    It is true. I watched the entire video before it was yanked. Not only were there no exploding physical matter- there was no blood. No limbs, no brain mater, no body fluids. How is that possible? The pops were muted and sounded like special effects from a B movie.

    The moaning was exaggerated and just…odd. Again, when media describes it as horrifying- its not. Its just pop sounds and big mounds of people in a pile that he shoots over and over. The mosque is quiet and empty. His shots sound EXACTLY like a video game.

    I don’t pretend to know what that means. But it was the most sanitized mass shooting video you could imagine. And now almost impossible to find.

    • Replies: @Alden
  69. TKK says:

    I downloaded his writing, The Great Replacement.

    He only has one sentence about Jews. He has no problems with them as long as they stay in Israel.

    He writes a great deal about his hopes of instigating a civil war in America over the 2nd Amendment. He hoped his actions would trigger a civil war along race lines and the Whites would win.

    His main thrust is the eradication of the White race and the rampant fertility rates of the Muslims…the Great Replacement. He does not blame Jews for this.

    He is NOT concerned with Jews- at all. His focus is Muslims and their acts of terror on Western white citizens.

    Not even close enough for a cigar. READ something before you make assumptions. He spent a lot of time on it and it is not poorly written. It is an outcry against immigration and the death of white culture.

  70. Cowboy says:

    Muslim Crisis actors and Crisis Project Managers in action:

    • Replies: @ANonymous
  71. Cowboy says:

    “Neo-Nazi hand signals” they all brayed. Yet here we have a bunch of SAS snipers proudly making exactly the same hand signal. Or is it just that they happen all to belong to the same secret society?

    Nothing to see here, move along.

    • Replies: @Germanicus
  72. Alfred says:

    It should be pretty obvious that it was a false flag. The NZ police took 20 minutes to arrive. Christchurch is a tiny place. I was there 3 years ago and walked from one end to the other with my kids in no time at all.

    If 9/11 happened today, they would ban all videos and threaten people with 10-year prison sentences.

    The prime minister of New Zealand was an assistant to Tony Blair. Need I say more?

    • Replies: @SunBakedSuburb
  73. anonymous[253] • Disclaimer says:

    There is one basic problem. A court ruled that a corporation is a person.

    In business, at least, it is NOT a new concept that “a corporation is a person.” It’s been awhile since I studied UCC, but I’m pretty sure corporations were always considered a “legal person.”

    • Replies: @APilgrim
  74. @Cowboy


    Its a triple 6, certain crazy Chabad people like these kind of kabbalah gimmicks.

  75. @onebornfree

    Yes it is increasingly clear the video is fake … as noted elsewhere including by counter-terrorism expert Scott Bennett, there is an astonishing lack of damage or noise from walls etc getting hit with bullets, a lack of human screams and body movements as people are shot, etc … Whoever died in this incident, may have been ‘pre-killed’

    Here, an image with two stills from the video, you can see a ‘shooting victim’ apparently getting cold feet, putting on socks a minute after ‘being shot’

    The first frame, at about 6:49, is when ‘Tarrant’ is entering the building and beginning to ‘kill people’ – the victim who falls in a hallway at a side door entrance, has bare feet, as is often seen inside a mosque, where shoes are typically prohibited

    The second frame, at about 8:41, is when ‘Tarrant’ is heading along the same hallway in reverse direction … same victims are lying in the hallway at the same side door entrance … but the victim formerly with bare feet, now has socks on

  76. Alden says:
    @Fiendly Neighbourhood Terrorist

    I read your website. Nice cartoons, very well drawn.

  77. Alden says:
    @jeff stryker

    My sister did the 23and me test.

    398 years and 7 months since our first English ancestors, 387 years after our first French ancestors arrived, not a drop of American Indian DNA.

    We must come from a long line of racists

  78. Whitewolf says:

    It was a hoax. At least as far as that live stream shows. The hoaxcrimes are a useful tool for getting anti-gun and anti-free speech laws passed.

  79. Alden says:
    @Reg Cæsar

    The French Canadians who stayed home in Quebec married other French Canadians.

    The French fur trappers and explorers married Indian women, their children married Indians and all that’s left is some French surnames simiiar to the Portuguese surnames of Macau Chinese

    Historians have searched for the descendants of Sacajawea and Jean Baptiste Charbboneau’s son Pompey. But they seem to have disappeared into various North West Indian tribes, if he had any children.

  80. @Alden

    Before replying that nothing I have resd or heard makes it at all likely I Googled “were the Tarrants Israeli immigrants” and all I got was many references to thevkiller having visited Israel and no one knowing why.

    Where do you get such stuff that you think worthy of being repeated?

    Incidentally it would natural to ask whether they were disaffected Israelis if one gave it any credence. And then, I suppose, disaffected by what?

    • Replies: @Alden
  81. aandrews says:

    I’m Not Sure You Understand How Serious This Is


    Andrew Anglin
    Daily Stormer
    March 19, 2019

    So, Brenton Tarrant did the bit, and now we’ve got the thing.

    I said repeatedly before this event happened that as soon as Trump is out they are going to release one helluva crackdown, arresting dissidents, censoring the internet even more, accusing everyone of being a Russian agent, etc.

    And this type of Christchurch violence is going to begin to be woven into the ongoing situation.




    You have an emerging civil war situation between white nationalists and everyone else.

    And with each event, each side is going to escalate. As I have said repeatedly, and as Tucker said on Monday night, silencing speech leads to violence. That will be the state’s role.

    The Antifa will escalate their violence.

    And of course the Moslems will continue to escalate terrorist attacks.

    There is simply no way to avoid Brenton Tarrant becoming a regular part of this cycle. This is what multiculturalism was destined to lead to – all of it was written out as soon as the project began.
    [twitter link]

    I understand that this is scary for a lot of people.

    Some people are just fucking nuts and can’t wait to see everything kick off.

    Neither is really a good position to be in. A fatalistic position is much healthier. Understand the inevitability, and do everything you can to take care of yourself and your people.

    Right now, you are in the calm before the storm. Whatever you want to say about Donald Trump – and there is a lot I want to say about him – he is holding back a full scale crackdown on everything.

    These people are frothing at the mouth.

    (Don’t worry – it will be fine, we’ll handle it and make sure you know how to find us.)


    • Replies: @SunBakedSuburb
  82. @Germanicus

    “read that….”. Where?

    • Replies: @Germanicus
  83. APilgrim says:

    Exterminate the Caliphates.

    Nits Make Lice.

  84. APilgrim says:

    Blackstone, in ‘The Common Law’, Volume 1, described corporations as “Artificial Persons”, if memory serves.

  85. Alden says:

    1973 Palestinians killed 5 and wounded about 60 people in the Athens Airport using handguns and grenades.

    There was a picture taken the next day later that was featured in newspapers and magazines around the world

    The floor was covered with blood. Some janitors were moping up. Their mops were red. The water in their buckets was red. The floor was covered with blood with streaks of the white floor showing through.

    • Agree: TKK
  86. @Robert Dolan

    White males occupy the bottom of intersectional pyramid. They will speak when spoken to.

  87. @WorkingClass

    The only humans that Trump can trust are out of their element in the DC poison pit. Those humans being his family, though he does need to distance himself from creepy Jared and Ivanka. His two eldest sons, who unfortunately share a mutual taste for trophy hunting, are the guys he probably depends on. But as I said they are out of their element, Donny.

  88. @Anonymous

    Despite having a whiff of Reverend Corvinus about you, newbie, I must say your last two paragraphs are accurate. Though I would add that Trump hate has led the Dems to welcome neocon demons like Max Boot onto their platforms.

  89. @aandrews

    I worried about right-wing authoritarianism during the Dick Cheney Regency. Now I fear the well-funded left-wing authoritarianism infecting our culture and government.

    • Replies: @aandrews
  90. Alden says:
    @Wizard of Oz

    He also visited Pakistan and wrote that it was beautiful, especially the mountains. He couldn’t understand why more people didn’t visit Pakistan.

  91. aandrews says:

    It’s always been two sides of the same coin.

  92. White peoples calling others Barbarians and Invaders and to kill the Children: The Whiteman sends Navy Aircrafts missiles and even special forces after their erroneous sanctions and after wrecking our lands with chaos while occupying it or anointing a Dictator, then steal our natural resources, So some of us migrate to Lands the Whiteman occupied after slaughtering the Natives in the millions Then they inveigle, provoke and bait Brenton Tarrant’s manifesto i.e.Their famous Tar- Rant: All Options Are On The Table: Yet the White audiences never see beyond the muzzle. I am happy it was Streamline…you can’t dodge the verdict in or minds/hearts. It ain’t Social Media, they had nothing to do with the West’s Tyrant> Tarrant’s manifesto.

    • Replies: @Hippopotamusdrome
  93. @Alfred

    I tried Googling the Christchurch shooter’s name, twice, and I was presented with pictures and stories of and about New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern (oddish name; odd looking lady). The shooter, Brenton Tarrant, does have what is described in conspiracy circles as a “shadowy past”. And I wouldn’t be surprised that Jacinda has moved up the ladder in the witch cult that has entranced the world.

  94. Alden says:

    Thanks. I never bother “ proving “ anything to Wizard of Oz. If he doesn’t believe what I write I don’t care.

  95. @Davy de Verteuil

    The Whiteman sends Navy Aircrafts missiles and even special forces after their erroneous sanctions and after wrecking *our lands* with chaos while occupying it or anointing a Dictator, then steal our natural resources

    “our lands”

    Those lands belong to everyone on Earth.

    • Replies: @El Dato
  96. El Dato says:

    No bullet holes or shattered wood or glass or clouds of sheet rock or exploding plaster or cement can be observed or heard as the guns are firing into them and the victims.

    Somebody has watched waaay too many hollywood movies, with explododdust and blood packets flying.

    • Replies: @Sbaker
  97. El Dato says:

    > Freemason in Canberra
    > Report via Sultan Abdallah

    A likely story.

    • Replies: @Germanicus
  98. El Dato says:

    Those lands belong to everyone on Earth.

    What does that even mean

    • Replies: @Hippopotamusdrome
  99. El Dato says:

    What an usufferrably boring exposé for highschoolers.

    “My PewDiePie is gonna be associated unjustly to Alt-Righters”

    So what!

    • Replies: @aandrews
  100. aandrews says:
    @El Dato

    Try not to think about it.

  101. Biff says:

    Much has been said about Obama, but at least the man had the balls to ignore the neocons and not to invade Syria.

    Obama(AKA corporate house negro) did what he was told to do – like a good negro does.

  102. @El Dato

    Would it be more credible to you, if the poster’s name was Goldstein instead of some Arab name? There are multiple such reports, different sources and in different languages.

    The official narrative of “white nationalist” is nonsense, is Tarrant just a made up or patsy guy, a distraction? His manifesto is a Eco Stalinist type, EUSSR technocrats love it.
    It is a manufactured, artificial event geared towards establishing the enemy the masses are supposed to hate. Cui bono?

    A shame, the lodge’s name wasn’t given, but Canberra is rather specific in Australia, it is where the theater, the political puppet stage is located.

  103. @Fiendly Neighbourhood Terrorist

    Unless you are just providing click bait don’t spoil your provocations with blatant inaccuracy. As to the white majority in Australia coming about “as the the result of the genocidal extermination of the native population” [I leave America to others] none of that is right.

    (a) The only significant reduction in native population resulted from Eurasian diseases that they lacked immunity to

    (b) Not only was there no extermination but the handful of massacres (some of which settlers were successfully prosecuted for) were not genocidal in intent or effect

    (c) the native population could never grow very large because of primitive technology and virtually no agriculture. The whites becoming a majority was an inevitable result of immigration and the creation of cities, most notably by reason of the Gold Rush of the 1850s together with the fact that the whites’ farming was very productive, and they could also, if necessary to support a larger population, import food.

    • Replies: @jeff stryker
  104. Anonymous [AKA "waffle"] says:

    several websites have stated outright that the NZ thing is a false flag and three different attempts to post to this website those website has failed..

  105. @Wizard of Oz


    Aboriginals vs Native Americans

    Native American women are quite attractive and British men intermarried with them which then meant that they had to get along with her tribe.

    Aboriginals were um, not attractive to British in Australia, and they preferred having sex with other British men to having sex with the indigenous women.

    When you cannot give the conquerors the only thing you’ve got to offer, which is your women, then you end up exterminated.

  106. @El Dato

    Those lands … What does that even mean

    When spoken by a white man, the words “our lands” is racist, white nationalist, Nazi hate speech. We will then be told that there should be open borders and all people are equal.

    Then someone claiming to be Middle Eastern says “The Whiteman [is] wrecking our lands”

    I am just equalizing a double standard. They don’t get to have “our lands”. The Muslims took the land from the Hittes or Medes or something and should give them casinos.

    As an example, the NZ guy’s manifesto contains the phrase “our lands” and it is so triggering that it is referred to in the article’s title.

    ‘Our lands will never be theirs’

    Shooter reveals why he attacked in vile 74-page manifesto

    Tarrant described his reasons for the disgusting attack as to “show the invaders that our lands will never be their lands, our homelands are our own and that, as long as a white man still lives, they will NEVER conquer our lands and they will never replace our people”.

  107. wayfarer says:

    “Zionist Connections to the New Zealand Mosque Massacre”

    • Replies: @aandrews
  108. republic says:

    List of websites in NZ and Australia now blocked


    Table of Contents

    Who is blocking and why?
    Websites blocked include
    The companies involved in these blocking are
    News Limited Lies and why was banned
    New Zealand Police – 10 years for possession
    Ways to get around the censorship
    Change the DNS in your router
    Use a VPN | Virtual Private Network
    Share this:

    Who is blocking and why?

    In the aftermath of the Christchurch attack there has been a disturbing trend from the government and large corporations to censor by making threats and actively blocking access to websites. This includes the extensive blacklisting of many websites that have tens of thousands of users from Australia and New Zealand all because there maybe a link to a video or the manifesto. Interestingly the website that first broadcast the video to millions of people Facebook is not blocked, nor is YouTube but it is OK to block smaller sites as they don’t have the resources to take action against government and large corporations.

    Mainstream media are also distorting facts in order to create news.

    This article is not about the attack and I am not offering an opinion on the contents or links to websites, nor the video itself, nor the manifesto but this is about the increasing issue of Internet Censorship in Australia and New Zealand.

    A number of ISPs in Australia and New Zealand are blocking access to websites that they have deemed to promote material or discussion relating to the Christchuch attack and the New Zealand Government are threatening long jail terms for people distributing copies of the video.
    Websites blocked include

    Kiwi Farms
    Zero Hedge
    Mega | New Zealand File Sharing site | This site was blocked because it criticised the NZ Government

  109. Arby says: • Website

    “Sen. Elizabeth Warren garnered much attention this month for her proposal to break up the tech giants: “Today’s big tech companies have too much power — too much power over our economy, our society, and our democracy. They’ve bulldozed competition, used our private information for profit, and tilted the playing field against everyone else. And in the process, they have hurt small businesses and stifled innovation,” Warren wrote in announcing her proposal.”

    That (above quote) is fakery of the highest order from a major faker. You’re trying to sell us false saviors. Complaining about big tech companies and their power is like complaining about the nastiness of some Nazi soldiers in World War II. The problem was the entire fascist system!

    Carry on Unz.

    • Replies: @APilgrim
  110. aandrews says:

    Yeah, well. It’s shmuleys all the way down. What else is new? That’s why the problem is intractable.

  111. Mefobills says:

    “Just be good” is asinine and sends a disheartening message to Trump supporters.
    Ha, yes, and not a smart strategy from Trump.

    Today’s big tech companies have too much power — too much power over our economy, our society, and our democracy. They’ve bulldozed competition, used our private information for profit, and tilted the playing field against everyone else. And in the process, they have hurt small businesses and stifled innovation,

    Our private information has been monetized by the big internet companies, so we are being used. A new type of internet will put a stop much of this, where your private information becomes yours.

    Tim Berners-Lee, inventor of World Wide Web, says this:
    The increasing centralization of the Web, he says, has “ended up producing—with no deliberate action of the people who designed the platform—a large-scale emergent phenomenon which is anti-human.”

    So, the real answer is something like Lee’s new software “Solid”, or a blockchain internet.
    We can’t just be “good.” Centralization is always bad, especially when a plutocracy of psychopaths attempts to control civilization through various nefarious means, such as controlling the narrative through their owned press, or using bribes to control politicians, or the secret state intelligence apparatuses e.g. CIA, MI6, etc., using compromising material… especially compromat mined from databases we have unwittingly contributed to, so they can both make money on us, and use to control us.

    A plutocracy of private creditors (banker’s and bondholders), and the deep state secret service organs, along with tech titans has merged into something “inhuman.”

    When a Dragon emerges, you should not just be “nice.” Being nice is for little girls and Soy Boys.

  112. Sbaker says:
    @El Dato

    And someone has never shot a mammal with a center fired rifle.

  113. APilgrim says:

    Where is that total Muslim Ban, which the President promised.

    There is no time like the present.

    Mass Deport, Serial Deport the SCUM!

  114. APilgrim says:

    Monopolies are contrary to the genius of a free society.

    Monopolists, like socialists & Muhammadans should be brought to harsh justice.


  115. Akir says:

    There are at least two sides to every story, and the side the media brings you is the side they are paid to bring you. The message to them is, ‘Write our side of the story or you will be looking for work. There is no freedom here and do what you are told.’
    The side of the people who live on the front line is, ‘These people who import themselves as refugees have their own theo-political agenda. They come into our culture of peace and freedom and take it over with rape, crimes and violence to introduce Sharia law. They don’t want to immigrate and integrate. They want to take over.’
    Look at the problems muslim immigration has caused in Sweden, England, Germany, Belgium and France.
    It is no wonder that the people who live in the rest of the world don’t want anything to do with it.
    Who would want to let people in who bring rape, violence, murder and the desire to politically control the country they wish to take over? Nobody.

  116. The act was evil, but no more evil than massacres with equivalent numbers of lost lives, like the Orlando massacre of 50 Americans by a radical Islamic terrorist, not to mention similar mass murders by Muslim terrorists, such as the San Bernadino mass murder, various mass shootings at American malls, the truck-ramming mass murder of 80 in Nice, the Paris concert massacre of 132, the Manchester bombing of a kids’ concert, etc., etc, etc.

    In none of those cases did tech companies ban hate speech by Muslims against Americans and other Westerners, even though all of those mass murderers of Westerners left a big internet trail of hate speech.

    Tech companies did not even scream censorship—nor did the mainstream media even cover it much—when two, young, Danish girls were murdered brutally by ISIS men in Morocco, with the terrorists decapitating one of the hikers. In an evil, evil act, the murderers put a video of the decapitation on her mother’s FB page.

    No censorship movement did that heinous incident spawn at American-owned, foreign-staffed tech companies. Nor were tech companies motivated to censor anything but the fact that a Muslim committed the gruesome-cubed murder, when an office worker was decapitated in an Oklahoma factory office.

    By de-emphasizing these murders by Islamic radicals, tech companies are deploying passive-aggressive propaganda that aims to keep Americans from getting too concerned about the non-economic aspects of mass-scale immigration. Many Americans are not feeling the economic impact due to cushioning from government, two high-paying and above-firing jobs for crony parents per household or due to cashing in on cheap foreign labor as business owners.

    The internet-censorship drumbeat is much louder when it is Muslims who are murdered in an evil manner. It is louder due to the workforce composition of many “American” tech companies—companies that were given a massive tax cut by Trump and the Republican Congress, even though they employ disproportionate numbers of foreign nationals, like many other non-tech companies that also received a huge tax in a country with 95 million citizens between 16 and 65 are sidelined from a labor force in which the average, “employed” person works only part-time.

    The foreign nationals staffing “American” tech companies are more sensitive to hate speech and hate murders, committed against non-Americans and non-Westerners.


    Give big corporations another big tax cut to spend on more stock buybacks and employing 1.5 million new temp workers from foreign nations each year, many of whom can afford to work cheaply due to welfare and tax credits for US-born kids.

    Foreigners are let into the US each year by the millions. They are given an open door to a country where wages have not risen in 40 years, partially because so many of the foreigners, like so many single-breadwinner moms, can afford to work cheaply due to layered monthly welfare and up to $6,431 in refundable child tax credits, when they are not working part-time or cheaply due to spousal income. Along with his corporate tax cuts, Trump made sure to give dual-earner parents with two incomes to cover unaffordable rent, including the womb-productive noncitizens, a tax cut.

    Corporations that do not invest in jobs for Americans——-but instead invest in other countries where they expand their operations———already get plenty of help from .gov to finance their overseas ventures. Trump and the Republican Congress gave them another big tax cut to spend on wage hikes for their already highly paid managers who trundle around the globe with their free-to-leave-work-all-the-time-without-getting-fired wives in crony-mom jobs in tow, taking one long, expensive foreign vacation after another described as “work.”

    This is financed mostly by our government, which lets corporations and individuals write off this foreign travel as a business expense. They get tax breaks for all of that expensive, vacation-like, global travel, counting it as a business expense, as if they were a straight-commission contract grunt, with a meager net income, driving long distances to non-vacation-like locations around the USA. That American has no guaranteed income and no benefits, but is spending tons of gas money trying to sell insurance policies and other things to small business in a pyramid-style arrangement with very sporadic pay. That is the kind of crappy “job” available to many Americans, particularly those who lack unearned income streams from a spouse, an ex spouse, welfare, child tax credits or retirement that make low wages and sporadic income from the many part-time or temp jobs feasible.

    The highly paid, salaried managers of American-in-name-only corporations get to expensive what are really just exotic, overseas vacations, with a little work, involving setting up businessses overseas that will employ foreigners, contributing to the tax base of foreign countries, while America has a $21 trillion national debt, 95 million working-aged citizens out of a labor force where wages have fallen for 40 years and where the average worker is a part-time employee. Those highly-paid, salaried employees of US corporations also get big bonuses for all their good, posh-vacationing work, ensuring that people overseas are employed, in addition to tax credits for sex, reproduction and educational expenses from Uncle Sam.

    Taxpayer-aided overseas business expansion is just one more de-facto foreign aid program, like the $120 billion in total remittances sent out of the USA each year to foreign countries by the foreign workers employed by US corporations and the $113 billion in welfare (and other expenses) to cover the food, housing, education, medical and electrcity expenses of womb-productive illegal aliens who often work under-the-table, keeping their traceable income low enough to stay under the earned-income limits for welfare programs every month, along with their monthly cash assistance and up to $6,431 in refundable child tax credit cash.

    Americans—and other Westerners—sure do spend a lot of money on womb-productive immigrants from all parts of the globe and a lot of money, assisting home-grown corporations in setting up overseas businesses that do not employ underemployed American citizens.

    That is never the focus of foreigners, including those living in the USA, enjoying the favoritism given to them by US corporations and the US government, compared to the way many US citizens are treated in the tax code, in government programs and in the employment arena of their own country.

    Foreigners employed by US tech companies—and their self-hating, liberal allies—are de-emphasizing the copious hate speech and the many, glaring, evil mass murders committed by foreigners, focusing mostly on hate speech and incidents of equally evil murder committed by Westerners, using that as an excuse to obliterate our Constitutional liberties.

    That is pretty bold—coming to an underemployed country to take jobs, then using your position to call for censorship of that country’s citizens.

    Funny thing, there is a lot of other, often non-political, hate-filled chicanery on the Internet. Much of it is directed at destroying ordinary individuals by name. Some of it provides an evil source of profit for bottom-feeding corporations and people around the globe, willing to make a buck off of destroying individuals. I guess we have to believe these people if they say they are religious or doing this evil work because they are “nice family people,” just trying to feed their children…..via evil.

    In a non-corrupt country where anything but profit for a few mattered, it would be illegal.

    But it does not seem to be of interest to these politically-motivated censors.

    The only thing that interests them is any incident that gives them an excuse for America-hating and hatred of the West in general.

    Foreigners have a love / hate relationship with the West, which shows up, hypocritically, in their enthusiasm for hopping on planes to come to Western nations, where they are happy to take jobs and to cash checks from the US government for producing US-born anchor kids through the nobel act of womb-productive sex, thereby displacing American citizens from jobs, driving wages down for 40 years and driving rent prices out of reach for many US citizens.

    Their take-over of Western countries, with the help of corrupt politicians who are bought-off by corporations, does not give any Westerner, anywhere, the right to commit mass murder against immigrants, nor do the complaints of non-Westerners about American foreign policy give anyone, anywhere, the right to murder Westerners.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  117. Arby says: • Website

    As in journalism in the mainstream (corporate owned media), you don’t even need to be told what to say. If you needed to be told what to say, you would not be reporting for the NYT or WaPo et al. Can someone who’s sold his soul get it back? Actually, No. You can recover from error – No one is perfect. But there’s a line you cross that you can’t come back from. Trump has lots of blood and suffering on his hands. He has been calling, along with the rest of his ruined political class, to God to “Bring it!” He belongs to the Devil.

  118. Anonymous[327] • Disclaimer says:
    @Endgame Napoleon

    Tech companies did not even scream censorship—nor did the mainstream media even cover it much—when two, young, Danish girls were murdered brutally by ISIS men in Morocco, with the terrorists decapitating one of the hikers. In an evil, evil act, the murderers put a video of the decapitation on her mother’s FB page.

    True, but it was a Danish and a Norwegian girl and they were both decapitated. I have the picture where both their heads were displayed side-by-side. As far as I know, that image was also sent to the mother’s FB page.

  119. Dannyboy says:

    Well probably the best course of action would be to target the Tech giant executives and their families instead of the Muslims next time.

    As a matter of fact you could throw in most of the upper echelon of what is called “academia” as well as those who go by the title “journalist” nowadays.

  120. Titus says:

    [Spamming multiple comment-threads with duplicates of the same comment is very bad behavior. Continue it, and all your future comments will be trashed.]

  121. Hey kids!

    Can you say “False Flag” ? Go to “Break the Matrix”, read “5 Things About the Christchurch Shooting that Prove it was a False Flag”

    Right under the article is “Brenton Tarrent’s” video. It is so patent a fraud, it is farcical: A substantial portion of it looks to be ported from a computer game.

    If I may blow my own horn, here is my take on that video:

    When you’ve finished reading Break the Matrix and watched “Brenton Tarrent’s” video.. you will not only doubt this story: You will also doubt that “Brenton Tarrent” even exists.

Current Commenter

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone

 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Washington Watcher Comments via RSS
The Surprising Elements of Talmudic Judaism
How America was neoconned into World War IV
Analyzing the History of a Controversial Movement