The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 Tobias Langdon Archive
Child-Mutilation Is a Happy Day
Three Jovial Jewish activists Promote the Poison of Translunacy
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

One golden day in late June 2022 I was walking my Saluki Zenobia by a canal near the great English city of Birmingham. Birds were singing, dragonflies were zooming, meadowsweet was sweetly scenting the air. I passed a moored canal-boat, freshly painted and gleaming in the sun. On its side, in elegant white script, ran the beguiling syllables LLAMEDOS. “What a beautiful and mysterious name,” I mused. “Is it from Tolkien? No, it must be Welsh.”

The mask for an evil agenda

Then something prompted me to read the name backwards. And I laughed. If you read it backwards, LLAMEDOS is “Sod ’Em All,” a crude British expression meaning roughly “Damn Them All.” I like the joke and I think Chaucer would’ve appreciated it (the boat-owner is probably a fan of Terry Pratchett). I don’t think the name is mocking linguistic beauty or exalted language. It’s acknowledging them, but reminding you with a wink that “All that glisters is not gold.” LLAMEDOS smiles, “Sod ’Em All” growls.

Well, I remembered that summer’s day and the name on the canal-boat when I recently watched a third video from anti-trans Twitter accounts like LibsOfTikTok, which is run by an Orthodox Jewish woman who doesn’t supply as much information about her “libs” as she could. I don’t go on Twitter much and I’ve watched only a few videos there. Three of those videos made a big impression on me. Each of them features a different woman radiating sincerity and good-will with lots of smiling and nodding and eye-widening.

Three jovial Jewesses promote translunacy: Rachel Simon, Christy Olezeski and Katherine Gast
Three jovial Jewesses promote translunacy: Rachel Simon, Christy Olezeski and Katherine Gast

Christopher Rufo:

Rachel Simon, who conducts transgender “therapy” on children as young as 4, said that “sexuality education starts the minute you’re born” and encouraged teens to distrust their “bigoted, misinformed parents,” especially if they are “religious.” — Jovial Jewess Rachel Simon at Twitter

Libs of TikTok:

Gast happily describes some of the “gender affirming” surgeries she offers to adolescents including vaginoplasties, phalloplasties, and double mastectomies. — Jovial Jewess Katherine Gast at Twitter

But the smiles on the punims are the mask for an evil agenda. Even if you watch the videos with the sound off, you may find that the curiously similar expressions of the women make your flesh creep. If you watch with the sound on, your flesh will certainly creep, because all three of them are talking happily about mutilating the minds and bodies of teenagers and children. In short, they’re priestesses in the cult of translunacy. And what are the odds that all three of them should be drawn from certain tiny minority? Each video turns out to star a jovial Jewess smiling and nodding and widening her eyes as she celebrates doing things like this to young gentiles:

Penile-inversion vagoplasty, for trans-feminine patients, so male to female, is about taking a penis and essentially turning it into a vagina. … So we create a clitoris from a portion of the glans penis, the scrotal skin becomes the labia majora, a portion of the penile skin becomes the labia minora and then we line the new vagina with the rest of the penile skin and sometimes a skin-graft. … Phalloplasty, for trans-masculine patients, or female to male, is about creating a penis through tissue-transfer. So we take tissue either from the fore-arm or from the leg or sometimes both and we transplant it down to the groin-area to create a phallus. And essentially we lengthen the urethra and turn the labia majora into a scrotum. We remove the vagina and close the hole between the legs and create a phallus. … Top surgery, or female to male mastectomy [breast-removal], for trans-masculine patients who have significant dysphoria related to their breasts. So they don’t want breasts any more. So essentially it’s a cosmetic mastectomy and depending on the breast-size and the amount of skin, we can use different kind of scar-patterns and re-section techniques using direct excision plus or minus liposuction to create a more male chest. Three hours in the operating-room, patients go home the same day. They may or may not have drains and they wear compression-vests post-op, but typically these patients are very happy and [the mastectomies] allow them to wear clothing that’s comfortable and not wear binders and it’s a happy day for everybody. (Transcript of video at LibsOfTikTok)

Jewish “gender surgeon” Dr Katherine Gast
Jewish “gender surgeon” Dr Katherine Gast
Marriage of a mutilator: Katherine Gast marries Eric Adelman
Marriage of a mutilator: Katherine Gast marries Eric Adelman

Those words are from the Jewish “gender surgeon” Dr Katherine Gast, whose marriage to Dr Eric Adelman was reported in the Cleveland Jewish News in 2008. I suspect that another of the jovial Jewesses, the psychiatrist Christy Olezeski, has been under the surgeon’s knife herself. She seems to have had a nose-job, presumably to look more gentile and less Jewish. She began her career as a “Predoctoral Intern” at “Westchester Jewish Community Services” and now describes her work at Yale University like this:

I am the Director and co-founder of the Yale Pediatric Gender Program (YPGP), an interdisciplinary team that provides services for transgender and gender expansive (TGE) youth and families in Connecticut. The team includes professionals in the fields of psychology, endocrinology, psychiatry, gynecology, reproductive medicine, medical ethics and law. Our mission is to provide comprehensive, interdisciplinary, family-centered care for children, adolescents and young adults questioning their assigned gender and/or seeking gender-affirming consultation and treatment in a compassionate, respectful and supportive environment. This program is regionally well-regarded, serving clients from all 8 counties in the state, as well as 4 states outside of Connecticut. (Christy Olezeski, PhD, at the Yale Department of Psychiatry)

The third jovial Jewess, the “psychotherapist, educator, consultant and author” Rachel Simon, hasn’t had a nose-job and doesn’t seem to mind about looking Jewish. She’s wearing a silver star-of-David as she smiles and widens her eyes and talks about “bigoted and misinformed parents” who don’t want their children to be introduced to the joys of gay sex and the treasures of transgenderism. Ms Simon proudly describes herself as “the author of The Every Body Book, an LGBTQIA-inclusive sex-ed resource for 7-to-12-year-olds.”

Rachel Simon’s “vibrant and beautifully illustrated” sex-and-gender poison for 7-to-12-year-olds
Rachel Simon’s “vibrant and beautifully illustrated” sex-and-gender poison for 7-to-12-year-olds

No need for prison

Would all three of these jovial Jewesses be serving long prison-sentences in a sane society? Well, no. There would be no need for prison, because they wouldn’t be in a sane society in the first place. In other words, a sane society would not be enriched by the presence of Jews, who are the world’s greatest promoters of perversion and mental illness.

Unfortunately, they find that White women in particular are very receptive to their subversion. In her “gender-critical” book Trans: When Ideology Meets Reality (OneWorld Publications 2021), the feminist Helen Joyce inadvertently supplies some excellent arguments for patriarchal control and against female autonomy. Discussing the sharp rise in translunacy among younger (White) women, Joyce says this:

The history of medicine is scattered with psychosomatic diseases that appeared, spread like wildfire and died away as medical thinking changed again. One sign a new condition may fall into this category is that it mainly affects teenage girls and young women. They are more likely than other demographics to indulge in “co-rumination”: repetitive discussion and speculation within a peer group. That can lead to internalising problems, and hence to anxiety, depression and self-harm. Girls are also often more empathetic than boys, and better at reading moods, which means emotions spread faster in a female peer group than in a male one. This is why self-harm and eating disorders can run through female friends, and why historical episodes of mass hysteria, such as fainting fits, uncontrollable laughter or crying, and outbreaks of paralysis or tremors, have so often occurred in convents and girls’ schools. (Op. cit., Ch. 5, “Miss Gendering: Why teenage girls are identifying out of the prospect of womanhood,” pp. 106-7)

In effect, Joyce is accepting a highly sexist stereotype of young women not just as conformist, histrionic, and hysterical, but also as needing male control and influence to protect them from their own toxic emotionality. Later in her book, Joyce notes that “young women” are “the demographic keenest on gender self-ID” (p. 225), despite the threat it poses to them and to female-only spaces. Translunacy is yet another example of how Jews play a necessary but not sufficient role in the collapse of the West, because they need goy customers and fellow-traveling professionals for their ideological poison. White women are now proving very eager customers for translunacy.

Translunacy is merely the most recent of the ideological poisons they’ve injected into the veins of gentile societies. But they’ve been brewing that poison for a long time: as Kenneth Vinter describes at Counter Currents in his review of Scott Howard’s The Transgender-Industrial Complex (2020), the godfather of translunacy was the Jewish “sexologist” Magnus Hirschfeld (1868–1935), who was enthusiastically promoting transgenderism, homosexuality, and pornography well before the Second World War. Pornography is, of course, another Jewish specialty, as Kenneth Vinther describes at Counter Currents in “Oppression by Orgasm? The Porn Industry as Jewish Anti-Fascist Action and Cultural Terrorism.” And even when Jewish porn is trans-free it contributes to translunacy by what you might call a synergy of sin.

And how does trans-free Jewish porn contribute to translunacy? Well, why are so many adolescent girls in Western nations claiming to be “transgender”? Why do they want to bind their breasts flat and even, under the scalpels of smiling “gender surgeons” like Dr Katherine Gast, have their breasts cut off? One big reason, in addition to the incessant propaganda they are likely to encounter in schools and on social media, may be that they don’t want to meet the obnoxious expectations created in young men and adolescent boys by Jewish porn. For far too many women today, sex is literally a pain in the ass. And worse than that, as the Guardian has recently reported:

Women in the UK are suffering injuries and other health problems as a result of the growing popularity of anal sex among straight couples, two NHS surgeons have warned. The consequences include incontinence and sexually transmitted infections (STIs) as well as pain and bleeding because they have experienced bodily trauma while engaging in the practice, the doctors write in an article in the British Medical Journal.

Tabitha Gana and Lesley Hunt also argued that doctors’ reluctance to discuss the risks associated with anal sex was leading to women being harmed by the practice and letting down a generation of women who are not aware of the potential problems.

In the journal, they said “anal intercourse is considered a risky sexual behaviour because of its association with alcohol, drug use and multiple sex partners”. However, “within popular culture it has moved from the world of pornography to mainstream media” and TV shows including Sex and the City and Fleabag may have contributed to the trend by making it seem “racy and daring”.

However, women who engage in anal sex are at greater risk from it than men. “Increased rates of faecal incontinence and anal sphincter injury have been reported in women who have anal intercourse,” the report said. “Women are at a higher risk of incontinence than men because of their different anatomy and the effects of hormones, pregnancy and childbirth on the pelvic floor.

“Women have less robust anal sphincters and lower anal canal pressures than men, and damage caused by anal penetration is therefore more consequential. The pain and bleeding women report after anal sex is indicative of trauma, and risks may be increased if anal sex is coerced,” they said.

National Survey of Sexual Attitudes research undertaken in Britain has found that the proportion of 16- to 24-year-olds engaging in heterosexual anal intercourse has risen from 12.5% to 28.5% over recent decades. Similarly, in the US 30% to 45% of both sexes have experienced it.

“It is no longer considered an extreme behaviour but increasingly portrayed as a prized and pleasurable experience,” wrote Hunt, a surgeon in Sheffield, and Gana, a trainee colorectal surgeon in Yorkshire. Many doctors, though, especially GPs and hospital doctors, are reluctant to talk to women about the risks involved, partly because they do not want to seem judgmental or homophobic, they add.

“However, with such a high proportion of young women now having anal sex, failure to discuss it when they present with anorectal symptoms exposes women to missed diagnoses, futile treatments and further harm arising from a lack of medical advice,” the surgeons said.

NHS patient information about the risks of anal sex is incomplete because it only cites STIs [sexually transmitted infections] and makes “no mention of anal trauma, incontinence or the psychological aftermath of the coercion young women report in relation to this activity”. (Rise in popularity of anal sex has led to health problems for women, The Guardian, 11th August 2022)

This is yet another example of how leftism most harms those it claims to care about most. It’s leftism that has made doctors reluctant to seem “judgmental or homophobic” about a deeply unnatural and unhealthy form of sex. And it’s women who have paid the price in the form of “pain,” “bleeding,” “sexually transmitted infections,” “fecal incontinence” and “anal sphincter injury.” That’s why I think that article in the Guardian is wrong to talk about the increased “popularity of anal sex.” No, it should be the increased practice of anal sex, because the “popularity” will be found much more among men than women.

Fleeing Jews to be mutilated by Jews

The practice of anal sex has, of course, been promoted assiduously by Jewish pornographers for decades. And now, as the article noted, “within popular culture it has moved from the world of pornography to mainstream media.” Perhaps the most popular mainstream show to promote it is Sex and the City, which was brought to the world by the Jewish producer Darren Star (born 1961). In other words, Jews have liberated shiksas (gentile women) into an exciting new sexual world of pain, bleeding and “anal sphincter injury.”

Can you blame those adolescent shiksas who want to shun adult sexuality and deny their own femaleness by becoming “transgender”? I can’t. Not in the slightest. But when those shiksas flee Jews and their poison in one part of modern Western culture, they fall into the hands of jovial Jewesses like Dr Katherine Gast, who will cut their breasts off and announce that: “It’s a happy day for everybody.”

(Republished from The Occidental Observer by permission of author or representative)
 
Hide 32 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. There are people who see themselves fatter than they are (‘anorexia’), likewise there are people who see themselves as “having been born with the ‘wrong’ sex”. Very sad!

    Honestly, I do not know if acquiescing their ‘fantasies’ is the right course…

    Anyway, to ‘switch’ their sex organs¹ with a Doctor, one should be at least 18 – although, perhaps there’s a stronger argument to wait until more-or-less 25: after the brain is fully developed.
    (P.S.: No PUBLIC money should be involved.)

    …To being able to ‘switch’ their sex² on legal/official documents is even trickier/hairier – I’m undecided.

    [There’s another point I’d like to state but I blanked out! Oh, well…]

    1. Or, alternatively, taking ‘hormone blockers’ and what-not. (although, maybe taking hormone blockers aged 16 should be legal…)
    2. Or, alternatively, changing their forenames to forenames of the opposite sex.

    • Replies: @Angharad
  2. perhaps there’s a stronger argument to wait until more-or-less 25: after the brain is fully developed

    …happy dream

  3. DanFromCT says:

    Imagine the actual procedures Dr. Gast performs. Such demonic evil cannot remain unchecked by Republican inaction that has sanctioned every move leftward as the new status quo for seventy-five years. When the Democrats’ BLM and Antifa goons were burning down cities, looting, and killing whites, the Republicans and Pentagon stood down to defy Trump. Now that these Jewish fiends are mutilating children, Republican inaction amounts to assent.

    All the Republicans would have to do to put a stop to this tomorrow is do what the Democrats did in 2020, but this time marshal, not thousands, but millions in the streets. They won’t of course, because the Republican Party, despite getting something like 35% and not all its money from rich Jews, still answers only to Jews. It’s function is neutralizing opposition, not providing it.

    Just one mutilated child should have started a civil war and would have but for Jewish stooges like McConnell, McCarthy, and Graham. Graham even had the gall to introduce a federal ban on abortion with zero chance for passage, not on principle since waiting until after the elections would increase the bill’s chances, but solely to drive Democrats to the polls and ensure they retain control of Congress.

    Where is the opposition? Where are the Christian leaders at the head of armies of parents ready to hang these Jewish monsters mutilating our children?

  4. Where are the Christian leaders at the head of armies of parents ready to hang these Jewish monsters mutilating our children?

    They are not “mutilating our children”. They are, all in all, mutilating the children of liberals – and, p’r’aps, the children of a couple of moderates. Given the Heritability of Personality, such children are going to be liberals when they grow up anyway…

    It’s, yet again, liberals sterilising themselves – like abortion. A strategic win-win for the Right.
    .
    .
    .

    Look, children/teens cannot consent¹ ‘sex re-assignment surgery’ – but, frankly, I do not weep for long as I know under a Eugenic Programme such ‘spiteful mutants’ would be weeded out eventually anyway.

    1. See my 1st post in this thread.

    • Agree: Jim Christian
  5. Female Genital Mutilation no longer seems an issue in the era of tranny penis-cutting and breast-lopping.

    • Replies: @anarchyst
  6. anarchyst says:
    @Priss Factor

    You forget about male genital mutilation…
    Male genital mutilation is also performed on gentiles, the medical profession claiming that it should be done for “health reasons”.
    Removing a healthy body part without medical necessity is a CRIME and should never be tolerated or allowed.
    Here in the USA, this barbaric procedure is performed on gentiles in order to dilute the “unique identity” that jews (claim to) possess for themselves. This makes it much easier for jews to “hide” their identity.
    Male genital mutilation must be outlawed worldwide.

  7. @anarchyst

    There are Group-Evolutionary reasons why so-called “Female Genital Mutilation”¹ is fitness-enhancing – at least, for races like Somalis and the like.
    But, surely, at the very least, for Whites and East Asians, that should be made illegal.

    Regarding circumcision, now:
    I have doubts about making circumcision illegal at all, but I lean towards “Yes, it should”. However, for Blacks, au contraire, maybe (just maybe!) it should be encouraged: given Blacks’ greater propensity towards contracting sexually-transmitted diseases…

    P.S.: No! I’m not circumcised! LOL

    1. I detest the “mutilation” terminology – not neutral.

  8. The entire basis of the Jewish race-cult is a primitive propitiary ritual during which the genitals of young male babies are mutilated.

    Apparently at some stage in the distant past, some Bronze Age[1] primitives became convinced that a Canaanite Storm deity had a thing for foreskins. Sounds retarded, but here we are…

    [1] There is almost no evidence that the scattered hill tribes involved had achieved genuine Bronze Age technology. They were at all material times living in part of the Egyptian Empire… the Egyptians definitely had metallurgy that included bronze: the Ancient Gyppos left a vast quantity of archaeological evidence that is mysteriously absent for the foundational kikes.

    • Replies: @anarchyst
  9. anarchyst says:
    @Vergissmeinnicht

    With blacks I would take it a step further…
    ALL black males would be spayed or neutered at birth.
    The same goes for black females.
    Regards,

  10. anarchyst says:
    @Kratoklastes

    It gets worse…
    There is another more sordid aspect to “male genital mutilation” when performed on a jewish male infant.
    As part of the “ceremony”, the dirty “mohel” conducting the circumcision routinely fellates (metzitzah b’peh) the male jewish child, passing any STDs that he may possess to the child.
    As STDs can remain dormant for years and even decades, they are commonly undiagnosed and do result in mental illness in one’s adult years. There are many documented cases of STDs being passed on from “mohel” to infant…not good–some even resulting in death of the infant.
    As a result, most jewish psychoses are a result of mental illness brought on by the unsanitary and traumatic processes involved in this barbaric and unnecessary procedure.
    It is long overdue to outlaw this barbaric practice worldwide. If jews want to have it done, they can go to israel…

  11. MarkU says:
    @anarchyst

    Some religious types evidently believe that God made a mistake when he designed the penis, that level of self confidence is difficult to argue with.

  12. MarkU says:
    @Vergissmeinnicht

    I detest the “mutilation” terminology – not neutral.

    https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/mutilation

    1: an act or instance of destroying, removing, or severely damaging a limb or other body part of a person or animal

  13. @anarchyst

    I so agree with your post. What’s with Jews and their obsession with cutting up nature’s perfect God-given bodies? It is a demonic act derived from centuries of penis-cutting of 8-day-old baby boys.

    With the first (and worst) cut viewed as natural, even hygienic, Brit Milah (MGM) is honored as a Jewish religious rite. Consequently, it becomes much easier for the rest of the cutting, now expanded to females, to be accepted without much outrage from the masses of gentiles. To complain too loudly about Jewish childhood sexual abuses is anti-semitic. Can’t have that, can we?

    Usually, I read every TUR article which touches on the subjects of child-mutilation, sex change surgery, pedophilia, transgenderism, etc. and always come away disappointed. The writers, whatever their good intentions, always miss the elephant in the room, which is that the cycle of abuse begins with the penis reduction surgery of baby boys.

    • Thanks: anarchyst
    • LOL: The Real World
  14. @Vergissmeinnicht

    Circumcision helps prevent all manner of bacterial and disease issues for both men and their women partners. That is a huge positive and is the primary reason it is done.

    I find it completely bizarre how many people don’t realize that an “unclipped tool” is a mucus membrane unlike a clipped one. That increases disease potential exponentially and the women partners will tire of having to treat what is passed on to them. Also, in the USA, women are not used to the uncircumcised format and many would likely not be interested in it.

    • LOL: follyofwar
    • Replies: @MarkU
    , @Mary Marianne
  15. MarkU says:
    @The Real World

    Yeah, that God person really fucked up there, nothing new about that though, look at tonsils and the appendix.

    • Replies: @The Real World
  16. @MarkU

    Well, exactly.
    It’s strange that some consider the human body perfect when it is far from it.
    There is much than could be improved.
    I’ll add the need for stronger teeth to your list.
    (Lol, and frankly, a third arm would most helpful.)

  17. @anarchyst

    Here in the USA, this barbaric procedure is performed on gentiles in order to dilute the “unique identity” that jews (claim to) possess for themselves.

    That is nonsense. It IS done for health reasons…plenty of them. You should inform yourself and there is alot of research to be found online about the topic. Denial is a sad and self-defeating way to live. Just saying…

    • Replies: @anarchyst
  18. anarchyst says:
    @The Real World

    You are wrong. There is NO MEDICAL NECESSITY for male genital mutilation. You are either a doctor who cashes in on the male genital mutilation procedure or you are a jew, or both…
    Shalom
    P. S. In the rest of the civilized world, male genital mutilation is uncommon among gentiles. It is only the USA which pushes this barbaric unnecessary procedure as a “health issue”.

    • Agree: follyofwar
  19. You merely continue to evidence ignorance. That’s a choice, you know, so why choose it? Btw, I am neither of the two things you so provincially ascribed to me.

    There are HEALTH reasons for circumcision for both males and their female partners. They are well-known and that is primarily why it is done. Many bacterial infections and some diseases are mostly avoided when his tool is no longer a mucous membrane. But, then if you bothered to be an informed person you would know that.

    Being Jewish is not a factor in most of the world where the procedure is common. Here, have fun: https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/circumcision-by-country

    More info. https://www.healthgrades.com/right-care/childrens-health/health-risks-associated-with-being-uncircumcised

    https://publichealth.gwu.edu/content/research-strengthens-case-sexual-transmission-bacteria-linked-hiv-risk Paragraphs 2 and 3.

    https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/04/130416102314.htm

    There’s loads more online. You could read for hours. The internet is a friend to all.

    • Replies: @Vergissmeinnicht
  20. @The Real World

    One could also “read for hours” the negative consequences of circumcision…

    Examples:
    https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/135910530200700310
    https://academic.oup.com/ije/article/40/5/1367/658163

    As I said in a previous post in this thread: I’m currently undecided regarding the ‘Circumcision Question’.

    • Replies: @The Real World
  21. @Vergissmeinnicht

    Thanks for the info. I will look at it in the AM.

    If you don’t mind me asking, what country do you live in?

  22. @anarchyst

    Male genital mutilation must be outlawed worldwide.

    Good luck in getting a billion Mohammedans to go along.

    • Replies: @Meena
  23. Meena says:
    @Reg Cæsar

    “The church played a central role in the independence struggle and the leadership just doesn’t want to pull the scab off this,” says Murdoch, who like Lingsma covered the bloody militia rampage that followed the independence vote…..

    as “arrogant, acerbic and short-tempered,

    ….
    flee the country on an Australian air force aircraft.

    https://asiatimes.com/2022/10/nobel-peace-prize-winner-belo-an-alleged-pedophile/

    Few billions Catholic can’t force church get rid of the system that nurtures pedophilia , limits the bishop ship to the covert pedohilic , and shelters them in new lands when Vatican can’t tolerate the level of debauchery , how could one convince Muslim to stop practicing something that doesn’t lead to sex change , gender change , to new identity but generates only some smugness of disapproval from groups with religious affiliations to Catholicism or it’s offshoots ?

    Secular group in Australia has no qualms in protecting a fleeing pedophile because he was fighting Muslim ( and allowing Australia to seize the resources ) either .

    Mr Belo known as freedom fighter , priest and Nobel prize winner is all of those simply because all of these allowed him to sleep next to hundreds if not thousands of 4-9 years old Timorese from
    1980 to 2004.

    • Replies: @anarchyst
  24. @The Real World

    Dude, just 🫧wash🫧 your wiener properly like all other men on this planet who don’t circumcise and stop being so gross!

    There’s medical proof that circumcision stunts sensitivity in the penis, which can lead to a less satisfying sex life for men. Maybe that’s why so many American men are going for the extreme porn and extreme sex habits these days, because you guys need to compensate for the fact that you can’t feel shxt in your wiener.

    The only men who might need a circumcision for health reasons are those whose foreskin is grown in wrong, which is less than 1% of the male population.

    • Agree: anarchyst
    • Replies: @The Real World
  25. anarchyst says:
    @Meena

    The rate of incidence for sex crimes is about 1 %.
    That is Far less than that of Protestants, JEW Rabbis, Boy Scout troopmasters or certainly Public School administrators. The leader in sex crimes against children is usually inter family related ie Step Fathers, Friends, uncles etc.
    JEWs made a crisis, than brought suit against the centralized Catholic Church and in so doing, forever tarnished the clergy who was their archnemesis.

    Free Republic

    Pedophilia Only a Catholic Sin?
    August 14th, 2009 | Kevin Roeten

    Pedophilia Only a Catholic Sin?

    It turns out pedophilia is an incorrect term, and Catholics aren’t responsible for most of it.

    Shockingly, AP breaks out of their typical liberal mold and reports Insurance companies shed light on extent of sex abuse in Protestant churches, that sexual abuse of minors has been rampant. But in their statement, they indirectly say members of the Catholic Church are not the majority abusers.

    AP discusses the raw numbers from three companies that insure the majority of protestant churches in America (Church Mutual, Guide One, and Brotherhood Mutual), and typically receive 260 reports/yr of people under 18 being sexually abused. Compare that with ~228 credible accusations/yr against Catholic clerics since 1950 (documented abuse records).

    Together with that information, it is known that the Catholic Church greatly outnumbers any specific Protestant denomination, and the data for Protestant churches is available only for the last seven years. Ever since the first sexual abuse cases had been reported, Catholics have had requirements: 1) police background check done on all volunteers,including priests, 2) a second person be present at all religious functions, and 3) all personnel involved with minors must take routine checks with Protecting God’s Children.

    Without a doubt, sexual abuse of a minor is one of the most despicable crimes and sins that man can perpetrate. But predators seem to thrive in an atmosphere where the base congregation is one of the most trusted organizations that exist.

    Philip Jenkins, in his 1996 book Pedophiles and Priests, [[link edited for length]], looked at the problem objectively and dispassionately. Jenkins (who is not Catholic) found that true pedophilia is extremely rare, and perhaps more common among Protestant clergy, and is even more common among married laymen.

    He found that in most sexual abuse cases (under the age of consent), the behavior is actually a variety of homosexuality. This sexual attraction with very young men that combine the charm of boyishness with sexual maturity is actually called ephebophilia. Pedophilia is really a psychiatric term meaning sexual interest in children below the age of puberty.

    The worst sex crimes against children is in the Jewish communities and protestant churches.
    Tomasi was not reserved with criticism either and citing data published by the daily Christian Science Monitor, which was founded a hundred years ago by the Christian Science Church, said that the Catholic Church cleaned its house, Jutarnji List writes.
    According to their figures the majority of the US child abuse cases happens in the Protestant churches and Jewish communities, says Tomasi.

    MORE PROTESTANT MINISTERS GUILTY OF PEDOPHILIA THAN CATHOLIC PRIESTS, NEW RESEARCH REVEALS

    A Penn State historian, Philip Jenkins, has done an in depth research of pedophilia and sexual abuse among the clergy and has come up with some rather eye opening facts. It seems that while 1.7 percent of Catholic clergy have been guilty of pedophilia (or sexual abuse particularly of boys), a whopping TEN percent of Protestant ministers have been found guilty of pedophilia!

    This is all the more interesting, notes Jenkins, since there has been NO media term Pastor Pedophilia coined at all!

    Jenkins theorizes that the media, proving the point of the necessity of sexual promiscuity, overemphasizes any instance of pedophilia found among the Catholic clergy since it can use this to criticize the entire idea of celibacy. But it is interesting that the NON Celibate Protestant ministers have a MUCH GREATER problem with it than the celibate Catholic priests!

    Protestant pastor pedophilia is not within the frame of our social constructionists as Jenkins calls the media:

    In the 1980s, [Pastor] Leyva had abused perhaps one hundred boys in several Southern states, but few of us ever learned of it. Leyva had the distinction of being a Pentecostal minister and was, therefore, not within the frame of those who were busy constructing reality. The same is true of the three brothers, all Baptist ministers, who were charged with child molestation in the 1990s; the public learned little about this highly unusual series of cases because it was not deemed worthy of dissemination by those fixated on Catholic scandals. [1]

    • Replies: @MarkU
  26. MarkU says:
    @anarchyst

    Who in their right mind would trust their children to the care of a man in a frock? There is no point over-complicating the issue. It really doesn’t matter what denomination of cosmic pederasty they belong to, just don’t do it, its as simple as that.

    • Replies: @anarchyst
  27. @Mary Marianne

    You have literally no clue what you’re ranting about and yap like a mentally retarded person.

    Too many people are allergic to FACTS. Which is especially ridiculous in an era of massive internet publishing. Try educating yourself; it isn’t difficult. (Well, perhaps it is for some hence the ignorance.)

    • Replies: @Mary Marianne
  28. anarchyst says:
    @MarkU

    Let’s take it a step further…or back, depending on the way you look at it.
    If you yourself are a male with male children, should YOU be trusted with them?…
    Same argument.
    I agree with you that homosexual, pederasty, and other sexual abuse against children are vile crimes, but to blame an entire clergy for it is just wrong.
    It’s the jew-run media with its visceral hatred of Catholicism that concluded that Catholic clergy pederasty was a big “plus” for them in which to besmirch all Catholics.
    Yes, the Catholic allowance of known homosexuals to enter the priesthood was a big mistake. One can wonder how many bishops and cardinals are also a part of the “lavender lobby”…
    According to the author’s research, vile behavior against children is more prevalent in Protestant and jewish circles, but gets no “airplay” as the jew-run media will not report on it.
    Regards,

    • Replies: @MarkU
  29. MarkU says:
    @anarchyst

    I understand your point that Catholics are likely no worse than any other other type of cleric, it was clearly implied in my post in fact.

    My point still stands however. Clerics of most denominations (those that do not allow marriage anyway) are a self-selected group of people who have renounced normal heterosexual relationships. My common sense tells me that the clergy is likely to have a higher than average proportion of homosexuals (in the closet or not) and people who are otherwise uncomfortable with their sexuality. Are these really people you want to look after your children?

    • Replies: @Meena
  30. Angharad says:
    @Vergissmeinnicht

    “Acquiescing” to deranged, self-destructive and harmful DELUSIONS by mentally unstable people is ALWAYS A BAD IDEA. No if’s and’s or but’s (or butt’s, for that matter).

    Willingly conceding to social insanity is the reason our civilization is swirling down the drain.

    FYI you CANNOT “change your sex”. Your DNA writes what you ARE in every cell in your body. All these sad, deranged people are doing is mutilating themselves.

    • Agree: anarchyst
  31. @The Real World

    The only one who’s allergic to facts is you, loser.

    I’ve literally the entire non-Jewish/non-American male population on this planet as proof that men don’t need to circumcise themselves.

    Try educating yourself, you dumbass yank.

    And learn to take a bath while you’re at it.

  32. Meena says:
    @MarkU

    Never thought that way.Thanks

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
$
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Tobias Langdon Comments via RSS
PastClassics
The Surprising Elements of Talmudic Judaism
Analyzing the History of a Controversial Movement
Shouldn't they recuse themselves when dealing with the Middle East?