The Unz Review: An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 Andrew Joyce Archive
Aspects of Black Anti-Semitism
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

“[Jews] infiltrate the Negro neighborhood with stores, and they exploit the Negro more than any other White group — housing, food, clothing — controlling the three basic things Negroes need. They claim to be friendly with Negroes but, when pushed to the wall, they are more injurious, more ruthless, than other Whites.”
Jeremiah X, 1965.[1]H.M. Bond “Negro Attitudes Towards Jews,” Jewish Social Studies, Vol. 27, No. 1, Papers and Proceedings of a Conference on Negro-Jewish Relations in the United States (Jan., 1965), 3-9.

Speaking to the Black historian Horace Mann Bond in 1965, Jeremiah X, then leader of the Atlanta Mosque of the Nation of Islam, argued that “the Jews are the Negro’s worst enemy among whites.” The reason Jews were particularly dangerous, explained Jeremiah, was the fact they “make it a practice to study Negroes; thus they are able to get next to him better than the other whites. He uses the knowledge thus obtained to get close to the Negro, thereby being in a position to stab him with a knife.” This metaphorical knife was both economic and socio-cultural. As well as acting as slumlord, pawnbroker, and merchant, the Jew of the Black world was also a manipulative political actor: “Through their control of the press and of other mass media they are able to make the public feel sorry for Jews. It is so bad today that anybody who speaks out against Jews is immediately clobbered as ‘anti-Semitic.’ They have made the Negroes to believe their sufferings have been greater than those of the Negro in America.”

This is an interesting perspective, to say the least, and for as long as I’ve been interested in anti-Semitism, I’ve been intrigued by the expression of hostility towards Jews among non-Whites. My reasons should be obvious. As I’ve written previously, concerning anti-Semitism in South Korea,

One of the most fundamental positions for White advocates concerned with Jewish influence must be the conviction that antagonism against Jews lies in Jewish behavior rather than solely the cultural pathology or psychological tendencies of non-Jews. A major testing ground for this position is the necessity for anti-Jewish attitudes to be present among geographically, racially, and culturally diverse peoples, and for the reasons behind this antagonism to be fairly uniform.

Black anti-Semitism in the United States is especially interesting in its own right for historical and contemporary cultural, economic, social, and political reasons. From at least the time of the Civil War, Jews, Blacks, and Whites have existed in a fateful racial triad, and Black anti-Semitism has much to tell us about all three groups, the relations between them, and the very nature of anti-Semitism itself. Black anti-Semitism has also maintained a constant, though often low-key, quality, with sporadic violent outbreaks since at least the first decade of the twentieth century, the most recent being the spate of assaults in December 2019. Of equal importance to the reasons behind this hostility is the Jewish response, and how that response molds Jewish understandings of anti-Semitism and determines the character of Jewish apologetics for their own antagonistic behaviors. The Jewish response to Black anti-Semitism will be the subject of a follow-up article, but this essay is primarily intended to provide an overview of some of the main aspects of Black anti-Semitism and its meaning and value to White advocacy. As such, it should be seen as complimenting and extending Kevin MacDonald’s essay “Jews, Blacks, and Race,” included in the 2007 volume Cultural Insurrections.

NBC News caption: Members of a Jewish Orthodox emergency response team work alongside police at the scene of a shooting at a kosher supermarket in Jersey City, N.J., on Dec. 11, 2019.
NBC News caption: Members of a Jewish Orthodox emergency response team work alongside police at the scene of a shooting at a kosher supermarket in Jersey City, N.J., on Dec. 11, 2019.

Features of Black anti-Semitism

In Separation and Its Discontents, Kevin MacDonald identifies the key themes of anti-Semitism as including an understanding that, speaking in general terms, Jews

  • represent a separate and clannish foreign group with their own set of interests;
  • are highly adept at resource competition and have a tendency towards economic domination;
  • tend to engage as cultural actors in order to shape non-Jewish culture to suit Jewish interests;
  • form a cohesive political entity that seeks politically dominant roles in non-Jewish societies;
  • possess negative personality traits, including the pursuance of a system of dual ethics in which non-Jews can be treated badly and exploited;
  • are disloyal to the host nation in all fundamental and meaningful ways

Among the factors mitigating anti-Semitism, one of the most crucial contemporary elements has been the Jewish promotion of multi-ethnic, pluralist societies. As MacDonald explains, “A multicultural society in which Jew are simply one of many tolerated groups is likely to meet Jewish interests, because there is a diffusion of power among a variety of groups and it becomes impossible to develop homogeneous gentile in-groups arrayed against Jews as a highly conspicuous group.”[2]K. MacDonald, Separation and Its Discontents: Toward and Evolutionary Theory of anti-Semitism (1st Books, 2004), 87. Of particular interest, then, is the extent to which the key themes of anti-Semitism manifest among Blacks, how they manifest, and how the Black position of being a celebrated component feature of pluralism (rather than, as in the case of Whites, being the majority population subjected to pluralism) impacts the mitigation of anti-Semitism.

Common sense would suggest that each ethnic group will inflect the themes of anti-Semitism according the context and precise nature of their own interaction with Jews. In South Korea, organised anti-Jewish hostility was built around the understanding that Jewish financiers, mainly American, with a history of highly exploitative behaviors, were attempting to gain strongholds in South Korean companies like Samsung. As such, the primary theme of anti-Semitism in South Korea has been the understanding that Jews are dangerously adept at resource competition, are financially ruthless and exploitative, are highly ethnocentric, and are powerful in the media and in politics at the highest levels. During the early stages of an attempted expansion of influence by the almost entirely Jewish vulture fund “Elliot Associates,” Media Pen columnist Kim Ji-ho claimed “Jewish money has long been known to be ruthless and merciless.” This was soon followed by the former South Korean ambassador to Morocco, Park Jae-seon, expressing his concern about the influence of Jews in finance when he said, “The scary thing about Jews is they are grabbing the currency markets and financial investment companies. Their network is tight-knit beyond one’s imagination.” A day later, cable news channel YTN aired similar comments by local journalist Park Seong-ho, airing the opinion that “it is a fact that Jews use financial networks and have influence wherever they are born.”

Among Blacks, the same themes have been inflected in less elevated terms, arising first from more modest economic conflicts and, as such, having something more in common with the complaints of the early modern European peasantries. Horace Mann Bond, in his own 1965 reflections on “Negro Attitudes Toward Jews,” comments on the fact Jews historically appeared in the African-American environment overwhelmingly as pawnbrokers, as monopolists of the liquor trade (“The Jews have a stranglehold on the liquor stores in this town”), as the primary sellers on credit of clothing and other essential items, and, perhaps most crucial of all, as the slumlord and property dealer (“Some Jews have bought up that urban re-development land and are putting up shoddy apartments they call “Nigger housing” on it”).[3]Bond “Negro Attitudes Towards Jews,” 5. In 2016, local news website Patch published a list of the 100 worst slumlords in Harlem, with the top ten including seven Jews (Mark Silber, Adam Stryker, Joel Goldstein, Marc Chemtob, Moshe Deutsch, Solomon Gottlieb, and Jason Green), a representation that has remained roughly constant every year, with Jews persistently claiming top ranking for building violations, rodent infestations, lack of maintenance, exploitative rent, mold, and other forms of building decay injurious to health. Indeed, this situation has at times resulted in considerable embarrassment to Jews.

Indeed, it is the sheer dominance and proximity of the Jews as primary exploiters of Blacks that has often caused a quite radical break in the Black imagination between perceiving wholesale “White oppression,” and the more nuanced understanding that Jews are a distinctive class unto themselves. Moreover, the reality of day-to-day interethnic exploitation leaves little room for abstract apologetic theories of anti-Semitism, since the problem is never that Jews arouse hostility merely on account of their religion or identity, but rather that Jews arouse hostility because of their behavior within certain ecological contexts. As Bond explains,

It is my considered view that Negro attitudes and actions towards Jews that are frequently interpreted as “antisemitic” actually lack the sinister thought-content they are sometimes advertised as holding. The occasional riots against small businessmen and landlords in Harlem — persons who may happen to be Jews — do not, in my opinion, actually possess the “classic” emotional load of aggression against a Jewish “race” or “religion,” that has been considered the essence of antisemitism.[4]Ibid,. 7.
(Bond “Negro Attitudes Towards Jews,” 5.)

I think Bond, in this instance, waters down the specificity of anti-Jewish hostility that eventually develops, because it’s more or less inevitable in the context of social identity theory that if someone is negatively confronted on enough occasions with “persons who may happen to be Jews” then they will eventually be forced to make an evaluation of Jews as a group. Bond, however, is of course accurate in pointing out that it’s perfectly possible for anti-Jewish actions to occur without the “sinister thought-content” often theorized and expounded upon in Jewish apologetics. Reading between the lines, Bond clearly interprets small-scale violence against these particular Jews as ad hoc reactions to local financial exploitation, an interpretive framework that by contrast has only been employed at the smallest of levels, and with the most minimum impact, when discussing anti-Jewish riots in the European past. Of further value is Bond’s doubting of the putative essence of anti-Semitism, “the classic emotional load of aggression” on the basis of race or religion, which again has only served to distance understandings of anti-Semitism from the realities of antagonistic Jewish group behaviors.

A lot of what has been discussed above is clearly resource-oriented, and economic competition between Blacks and Jews, devastatingly one-sided to be sure, goes right back to the arrival of the African in the Americas. Writing in a 1977 edition of Negro History Bulletin, Oscar R. Williams comments,

The presence of the southern Jews complimented the system of slavery; their mercantilist interest made slavery a more effective labor system. While most Jews were not to be found on plantations, their activities made the plantation a self-sufficient unit. What was not produced on the plantation was delivered by Jewish merchants. The southern Jew has as much, if not more, to gain from the system of maintaining slavery as any other white segment within the South. During the Civil War Jews defended the system which insured them acceptance and success in the South. Neither the Civil War nor Reconstruction changed the southern Jews’ perception of Blacks as an animal to be used and exploited.[5]O. Williams (1977). “Historical Impressions of Black-Jewish Relations Prior to World War II”. Negro History Bulletin, 40(4), 728-731.

While some initial divergence of opinion on race could be found between northern and southern Jews, the advent of the New South, and then the mass migration of Jews to the United States from Eastern Europe in 1880s, provoked a coalescence of Jewish behaviors in relation to Blacks. Williams continues,

Often in the New South, success of Jewish merchants depended on winning Black trade. Jewish merchants appeared more courteous and obviously spent more time with Black customers than fellow white merchants. Blacks were often victims of sales pressure when Jews refused to accept no-sale for an answer. No became the signal for the ritual to begin. Merchants would insist that the potential buyer try-on the item. After this came what Blacks call “Jewing Down,” in which naive Blacks were led to believe that Jewish merchant had allowed himself to be beaten on the price.

The post-Civil War movement of Blacks to the northern cities coincided with the mass migration of East European Jews into the same urban centers. Boasting centuries of experience in the economic exploitation of the lowest classes, Jews quickly set about the establishment of pawn shops, credit sales, and other methods of lending small-to-medium amounts of cash at interest.

Such was the scale of Jewish exploitation of urban Blacks in some areas that W.E.B. Du Bois was moved in 1903 to declare “The Jew is heir to the slavebaron.”[6]M. Adams (ed) Strangers & Neighbors: Relations Between Blacks & Jews in the United States (Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 1999), 18. And yet, growing alongside this exploitation was something hinted at by Williams. The Jews did in fact appear more courteous than whites, even if their behavior didn’t quite match the outward courtesy. And Jews did obviously spend more time with Black customers than with white merchants. The Black could be “Jewed Down” into believing he’d won himself a bargain, and he could also be “Jewed Down” into the belief that he had a friend and a helper in the form of the Jew, even if this illusion could last only for a short period, and all while the interest clock kept on ticking. Writing in Commentary in 1945, Kenneth B. Clark recounted how Blacks in Baltimore were pointing out that,

Jewish merchants own and control the major downtown department stores. … Some Negro domestics assert that Jewish housewives who employ them are unreasonable and brazenly exploitative. A Negro actor states in bitter terms that he is being flagrantly underpaid by a Jewish producer. A Negro entertainer is antagonistic to his Jewish agent who he is convinced is exploiting him. … Antagonism toward the “Jewish landlord” is so common as to have become almost an integral aspect of the folk culture of the northern urban Negro.[7]K. B. Clark, “Candor about Jewish-Negro Relations,” Commentary, Vol. 1, Dec. 1 1945, 8.

It is indeed a curious feature of American history that the growth of the Black-Jewish civil rights alliance should have coincided with the intensification of Jewish exploitation of Blacks. During the 1920s, the same decade that the mostly Jewish-run NAACP began a serious escalation in agitation for “civil rights,” Jews were invading Black areas in northern cities, using their growing political influence to engage in the exploitation of Blacks and the suppression of their local businesses. In Jews and Booze: Becoming American in the Age of Prohibition (2012), Marni Davis comments on the Harlem newspaper The Age which complained throughout the early 1920s about Jews who

had bought the police, fouled Harlem with their liquor, and were now poisoning the locals (sometimes literally) and siphoning away the neighbourhood’s hard-earned capital. … The Age noted that many of the stores in question had the name “Hyman” attached to them. They all turned out to be owned by Hyman Kassel [other liquor traders in Harlem included Izzy Einstein, Connie Immerman, and Dutch Schultz], a well-known bootlegger and numbers runner. … “Hebrew Operators Control Lenox Avenue Places,” blared one headline. … The accusations levelled by the Age resembled nativist claims that Jews were economic parasites and moral defilers.[8]M. Davis, Jews and Booze: Becoming American in the Age of Prohibition (New York: NYU Press, 2012), 163.

Davis comments that Jews “regarded the anti-alcohol movement as politically wrong-headed — even repulsive — and certainly as inimical to the civil liberties guaranteed by the Constitution,” but such explanations for Jewish opposition to the temperance movement (conservative, Christian, family-oriented) are glaring in their avoidance of the fact Jews possessed centuries of experience in exploiting the sale of liquor to the lowest classes in Eastern Europe in order to obtain and maintain political, social, and economic advancement and control (see Glenn Dynner’s 2014 Princeton-published Yankel’s Tavern: Jews, Liquor, and Life in the Kingdom of Poland). In other words, the argument that Jews pursued the often harmful sale of liquor purely out of abstract concern for “rights” and freedoms is a rather convenient way of side-stepping obvious, and often criminal, self-interest.

During the 1930s and 1940s, Jewish dominance of the trade in furniture, household items, and other essentials in the Black sections of northern cities led to the development of the idea among Blacks in several cities that Jews “only posed as friends.” These decades witnessed “rent strikes, business boycotts, and other forms of economic pressure,” as well as riots that were “tinged with anti-Semitic feeling,” all of which very closely resembled actions in Eastern Europe around 50 years earlier that had been characterized in contemporary propaganda as irrational and barbaric pogroms.[9]C. Rottenberg, Black Harlem and the Jewish Lower East Side: Narratives Out of Time (New York: State University of New York Press, 2013), 128. In fact, the causes of both sets of actions are almost entirely identical, with Steven Gold remarking in his fascinating 2010 The Store in the Hood: A Century of Ethnic Business and Conflict that between the 1930s and 1960s Jews “owned many of the largest businesses in ghettos, including department stores, hardware stores, and furniture stores.”[10]S. Gold, The Store in the Hood: A Century of Ethnic Business and Conflict (New York: Rowman & Littlefield, 2010), 73. Even as Jews moved into the suburbs, unlike other ethnic groups they retained as much economic influence in Black areas as possible, resulting in their becoming “out-group entrepreneurs and absentee landlords.”[11]Ibid., 74.
(S. Gold, The Store in the Hood: A Century of Ethnic Business and Conflict (New York: Rowman & Littlefield, 2010), 73.)
John Bracey comments,

No other group paid [the Black] the slightest attention: not the Germans, nor the Irish, nor the Poles, nor the Italians, not the Hungarians, nor the Slovaks; only the Jew established a line of communication, albeit a line of communication in trade and credit merchandising. True, the Jew had an advantage. To him the American Negro was no different from the Gentile peasants among whom he lived and with whom he dealt in the towns and villages of Russia, Galicia, Hungary, and Poland.[12]J. Bracey (ed), Strangers & Neighbors: Relations Between Blacks & Jews in the United States (Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 1999), 571.

Everywhere in these areas, remarks Gold, Jews and Blacks existed within a framework of “power and control,” and “The context within which African American women were hired and then supervised in Jewish homes was especially humiliating. At least in New York, this practice came to be known as the “Bronx Slave Market.” After public complaints, the La Guardia administration (1934-1945) created employment offices to provide black domestic workers with an additional measure of security and dignity.”[13]Ibid.
(J. Bracey (ed), Strangers & Neighbors: Relations Between Blacks & Jews in the United States (Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 1999), 571.)

The period 1945–1960s is often presented in mainstream historiography and social science as involving a Black-Jewish alliance in the pursuit of civil rights for African-Americans. Kevin MacDonald’s theory that this alliance was essentially an almost-entirely Jewish-operated venture in pursuit of Jewish goals and interests (the breaking up, via legislation and cultural change, of notions of America as a White country) has been maligned as itself anti-Semitic, despite the fact such interpretations are present even among Jewish scholars in the academic mainstream. Seymour Weisman, for example, writing in a 1980 edition of the Routledge journal Patterns of Prejudice, comments that “there was an obvious Jewish self-interest to promote legislation and initiate judicial actions” that would broaden the ethnic nature of the United States.[14]S. S. Weisman (1980) “Black‐Jewish relations in the USA—I: One year after the Andrew young affair,” Patterns of Prejudice, 14:4, 18-28.

The issue of Jewish self-interest is important because of the obvious implication of rhetorical insincerity. Much like apologetic narratives arguing that Jews traded in liquor, often via monopoly, because they believed in individual rights and freedoms, there are certainly grounds for doubting Jewish claims that they engage in “social justice” work out of sincere belief in the equality of Man. A particularly interesting case in this regard is related by Jeffrey Gurock in his The Jews of Harlem: The Rise, Decline, and Revival of a Jewish Community, where he recounts the great disillusionment of Blacks in the Bronx in the late 1950s on discovering that despite copious public Jewish rhetoric on racial equality, when a predominantly Jewish school in a predominantly Jewish neighborhood (and with a Jewish principal) “accepted five classes of Negroes” from a nearby school, they “isolated them on a separate floor.”[15]J. Gurock, The Jews of Harlem: The Rise, Decline, and Revival of a Jewish Community (New York: NYU Press, 2016), 213.

Seymour Weisman claimed in 1981 that it was something of a great mystery that “the breakdown of Black-Jewish relations” should have occurred “at that precise moment in history when the civil rights legislative battle had been won.”[16]S. S. Weisman (1981) “Black‐Jewish relations in the USA—II,” Patterns of Prejudice, 15:1, 45-52. In truth, the breakdown only takes on a mysterious aspect if one firstly believes the Black-Jewish alliance to have been sincere in the first place, and, secondly, that if one believes that Jews were sincere in the putative concern for the welfare and well-being of Blacks as a matter of “social justice.” Historical data would instead suggest that Jews were prominent exploiters of Blacks who rather expertly and skillfully created an image of themselves as friends and allies of Blacks. It goes without saying that once Jewish goals in pursuing such a masquerade had been accomplished, the Jewish effort in sustaining the positive but illusory aspects of such a relationship would dramatically decline. In the absence of rhetorical smoke and mirrors, all that remained was the constant of mundane economic, social, and political exploitation in the Black heartlands. This is what has simmered since the 1960s, and this is what bubbled to the surface once again in November 2019.

A fascinating feature of coverage of the Winter 2019/2020 attacks on Jews by Blacks in New York has been the total absence of media enquiry into why the assaults took place. Like so much historiography on European anti-Semitism, there is simply no room for the question Why? As in Kiev, or Odessa, or the Rhine Valley, or Lincoln, or Aragon, or Galicia, the assaults on Jews in Brooklyn apparently emerged from the ether, motivated by some miasmic combination of insanity and demonic aggression. NBC New York reported bluntly on a “spree of hate,” but had nothing in the way of analysis of context other than a condemnation of “possible hate-based attacks” — one of the most remarkably opaque pieces of analytical nomenclature I’ve ever come across. Former New York State Assemblyman Dov Hikind has said “The attacks against Jews are out of control, and we must have a concrete strategy to address the rise of these attacks,” but how he can develop a strategy to address something that apparently does not yet have an explanation is another question left unanswered.

What is clear is that Black anti-Semitism presents Jews with an objective problem in terms of their (publicly-expressed) self-concept as a people and the received wisdom regarding the nature of anti-Semitism (now given quasi-legal standing in many countries via the IHRA definition). The multiple ways in which Jews have sought to deal with this challenge will be addressed in a forthcoming follow-up essay, but it should suffice here to close with the remarks of Steven Gold on the Jewish response to growing Black anti-Semitism in 1940s Harlem:

Being well organized, Jewish communal associations took note when Jewish merchants were accused of inappropriate behavior. When African-American journalists or activists complained about the exploitative behavior of ghetto merchants, Jewish spokesmen often resisted accepting responsibility and instead labeled accusers as anti-Semites for referring to the merchants’ religion. Contending that Jewish merchants treated Blacks no worse than other Whites did, they objected to being singled out.[17]Gold, 75.

An age-old pattern had thus been employed with a 20th century twist. Denials of responsibility and accusations of blind and unfair bigotry had been honed to perfection for centuries in Europe, but now came the masterful flourish of the pluralist culture — to dissolve into “Whiteness” at will and direct Black anger at that mask instead. After all, isn’t the Jew the best friend a Black could ask for?

Notes

[1] H.M. Bond “Negro Attitudes Towards Jews,” Jewish Social Studies, Vol. 27, No. 1, Papers and Proceedings of a Conference on Negro-Jewish Relations in the United States (Jan., 1965), 3-9.

[2] K. MacDonald, Separation and Its Discontents: Toward and Evolutionary Theory of anti-Semitism (1st Books, 2004), 87.

[3] Bond “Negro Attitudes Towards Jews,” 5.

[4] Ibid,. 7.

[5] O. Williams (1977). “Historical Impressions of Black-Jewish Relations Prior to World War II”. Negro History Bulletin, 40(4), 728-731.

[6] M. Adams (ed) Strangers & Neighbors: Relations Between Blacks & Jews in the United States (Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 1999), 18.

[7] K. B. Clark, “Candor about Jewish-Negro Relations,” Commentary, Vol. 1, Dec. 1 1945, 8.

[8] M. Davis, Jews and Booze: Becoming American in the Age of Prohibition (New York: NYU Press, 2012), 163.

[9] C. Rottenberg, Black Harlem and the Jewish Lower East Side: Narratives Out of Time (New York: State University of New York Press, 2013), 128.

[10] S. Gold, The Store in the Hood: A Century of Ethnic Business and Conflict (New York: Rowman & Littlefield, 2010), 73.

[11] Ibid., 74.

[12] J. Bracey (ed), Strangers & Neighbors: Relations Between Blacks & Jews in the United States (Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 1999), 571.

[13] Ibid.

[14] S. S. Weisman (1980) “Black‐Jewish relations in the USA—I: One year after the Andrew young affair,” Patterns of Prejudice, 14:4, 18-28.

[15] J. Gurock, The Jews of Harlem: The Rise, Decline, and Revival of a Jewish Community (New York: NYU Press, 2016), 213.

[16] S. S. Weisman (1981) “Black‐Jewish relations in the USA—II,” Patterns of Prejudice, 15:1, 45-52.

[17] Gold, 75.

(Republished from The Occidental Observer by permission of author or representative)
 
Hide 108 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. Anon[350] • Disclaimer says:

    Hispanics don’t buy the Jew booshiite either. The Mexicans don’t like them at all. It seems the Hebrews just can’t help fu**ing over their supposed allies. Vassals only stay in line when the lords of the manor are respected and feared. Hard to feel either way toward such illuminaries as Weinstein and Epstein, and even the most ignorant brown can see that the Palestinians are the prime example of Tikum Olam in action. Not looking good for the Chosen’s ability to bamboozle.

    • Agree: JamesinNM
    • Replies: @Richard B
  2. melpol says:

    Jews go into the black ghetto to make a buck. It is a no go zone for whites and Jews fill that vacuum. Unemployed Jews were able to get a job servicing the needs of the black community. They went from door to door selling everything imaginable. But in the 60s it became dangerous for Jews to make a buck in the black community so they had to change their approach. They built malls on the fringes of black communities filled with security guards. Dwellings inhabited by blacks were selling at a discount, they were purchased by orthodox Jews. Profit margins were slim forcing Jew owners to cut back on maintenance and heat. The relationship between blacks and Jews still remain as skewed.

    • Replies: @Hibernian
  3. Anonymous[168] • Disclaimer says:

    It seems only whites love Jews, and perhaps Indians. These days the most overtly pro-Jew/pro-Zionist countries are the right wing Eastern European countries like Poland, Czech Republic, Hungary and even Russia to a lesser extent.

    The stereotype of the anti-Jewish Eastern European is long gone, if it was ever really true. Today they are the biggest moral supporters of Israel.

  4. neutral says:

    Nobody who comes into contact with jews ends up liking them.

    • Agree: Pheasant, Trinity, JamesinNM
  5. An aspect of the phenomenon that is ignored by this article is the fact that it seems to be overwhelmingly the Orthodox Jews who are in these allegedly exploitative economic niches.

    This makes sense when you consider how different groups with the talents to run these businesses will run the cost-benefit analysis of doing so. Consider:

    1. Orthodox Jews feel culturally alienated from mainstream white society, thus a trade for doing business with non-Jewish whites for doing business with blacks is just trading one culturally alien environment for another.

    2. Orthodox Jews commonly send their children to Jewish schools, meaning they are unaffected by the threat of “bad schools” which will deter most mainstream American groups.

    3. Orthodox Jews are open about their desire to preserve endogamy and have a say in who their children have relationships with, and can be so without fear of censure. In contrast, whites gentiles risk severe censure for being open about an opposition to interracial marriage even when it concerns their own children, and, ignoring the race aspect, are much less comfortable telling their children who they can and can’t date based on other factors like low intelligence and conscientiousness. Thus, they seek to affect the future relationships of their children by surrounding them with “acceptable” potential mates and hoping they make the right decision on their own.

    These same factors also explain the prominence of South and East Asian immigrants in this same economic niche. Like Orthodox Jews, they are culturally distant from the white majority and commonly practice endogamy and, in some groups, parents expect a large amount of say in their children’s relationships.

    • Agree: TKK
  6. anon[416] • Disclaimer says:

    all north african /middle eastern people are like that clanish ,sly and merciless when they have a little power over you with a high inclination for commerce .
    in europe moroocans argelians sirians pakis….. fail academically in every subject but they are able to subsist opening little shops and perform quite well in any area related to commerce.

    they are natural merchants

  7. anon[416] • Disclaimer says:

    i think the big difference between european and middle eastern merchants is that europeans see commerce as a means to an end in other words gain enought to live a prosperous life for middle eateners the activity of the commerce became the end itself where they can dump their personality and will to power

    • Replies: @Pheasant
  8. El Dato says:

    Cats and Dogs, doing commerce, while the world turns.

  9. “All north african /middle eastern people are like that clanish ,sly and merciless when they have a little power over you with a high inclination for commerce .
    in europe moroocans argelians sirians pakis….. fail academically in every subject but they are able to subsist opening little shops and perform quite well in any area related to commerce.”

    What a load of utter Bollocks! Including your piss-poor spelling.

  10. anonymous[276] • Disclaimer says:

    Nowadays black animus is directed more towards Asiana and Arabs since they’re the only non-blacks willing to operate stores with a black clientele. One can see the anti-Asian feeling in the LA riots where they targeted Asian properties. The remarks made by Andrew Young against these groups when he was hired to be a corporate shill showed his true colors. Blacks hate everybody else and have rioted against Jews, Hispanics, Asians and whites in general throughout the country. Is there anybody else left that they don’t like?

    • Agree: TKK
    • Replies: @Thomasina
    , @Nicholas Stix
  11. The writings of Dick Gregory and Richard Wright from the sixties were highly anti-Semitic about storekeeps, landlords and the banks, obviously not without cause. Jesse Jackson has a long history of anti-Semitism in writings and deeds like spitting in the food, Heimi-Town remarks and the rest. Hispanics have a lousy rating at ADL, giving ADL pause, Hispanics are given Nazi-level scores based on their complete lack of sympathies toward Jews. Chins, Koreans of every stripe and the Japs have no particular use for Jews, either.

    You’d think White Christians would have gotten better care and feeding from Jews, we’re the last ones that gave a shit about them. When we’re truly the minority and in no position to help, the Jews are gonna get run out. Pitchforks, torches, the works. If Jews think they’re going to be spared by Blacks and Hispanics simply because they’re Jews, well, they’re entitled to their delusions. Blacks and Hispanics aren’t going to be cowed with accusations of anti-Semitism, I can tell you that. They don’t give a shit.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    , @anon
  12. Anonymous[101] • Disclaimer says:
    @Jim Christian

    The main common ground Chinese and Indians have with Jews is their issues with the Muslim-majority regions that they want to take over and rule, like Xinjiang and Kashmir.

    In this sense China and India have an interest in backing Zionism because they are running similar colonial projects themselves.

    • Replies: @BDS Always
    , @Jim Christian
  13. Lot says:

    “Denials of responsibility”

    I hear this a lot from antisemites, but they never offer much in the way of what they consider proper examples of their own ethnics engaging in self-criticism. At best, they provide humble-brag type self-criticism like “We are too nice” or “We are too trusting and guileless.”

    So, let’s see from Joyce, a link to an example of the sort of ethnic self-critique “acceptance of responsibility” he demands from Jews coming from the Irish.

  14. Lot says:
    @neutral

    Women love Jews!

    [MORE]

  15. Tusk says:
    @Lot

    Jewish women certainly love Black men! The article on Fay Stender on Unz a while ago was a real eye opener to how commited Jews are to the racial cause.

  16. @Lot

    Women love Jews!

    Women love money they didn’t have to go earn themselves..

    Fixed that for ya…

    • Agree: Moi
    • LOL: Biff
    • Replies: @Lot
  17. @Anonymous

    “The main common ground Chinese and Indians have with Jews is their issues with the Muslim-majority regions that they want to take over and rule, like Xinjiang and Kashmir.”

    How can you take over an area that you already live in and your ancestors also lived in?
    Exactly the same thing happened in those areas as in Palestine, the occupation and subjection of the people.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  18. Anonymous[190] • Disclaimer says:
    @BDS Always

    Han Chinese and Hindus are colonialists in Xinjiang and Kashmir as Jews are in Palestine, that’s what I’m saying.

    China and India tend to support Israel/Zionism because those countries are doing exactly the same thing Israel is, colonising and subjugating people in lands that are not theirs and never were.

  19. @Anonymous

    Sorry, I got the wrong end of the stick.
    If we had honest main stream journalism then your original comment would be talked about in the news

    • Replies: @Jim Christian
  20. Renoman says:

    News flash – No one likes the Jews! What’s to like? The Arabs are a close second for most people. Anyone who can’t see this must be blind and deaf.

  21. @BDS Always

    Sorry, I got the wrong end of the stick.
    If we had honest main stream journalism then your original comment would be talked about in the news

    While I’m sure @anonymous is a fine and upstanding fella with a gold star and all, I’m NOT certain mainstream journalism, honest or dishonest, would ever notice his remarks here. That’s for the best. Jesus, can you imagine mainstream media getting their stories and editorials from Unz-Comments in the evening? A little of Unz-Comments are whacky of course, but 95% is cogent, earnest thought they cannot comprehend nor countenance in their scribbling and/or programming.

    This is why guys like @anonymous, you, Achmed and a thousand others in this salt mine have never been heard of owing to rejection by msm. Hell, if Taki’s, Ron’s, Theo’s and Sailer’s points rarely make it out from under the rug out to the MSM, betcherass they don’t worry about OUR scribblings as commenters. I doubt even the dopiest, snoopiest of Deep State bureaucrats ever heard of any of us, either.

    • Agree: tomo
  22. @Anonymous

    In this sense China and India have an interest in backing Zionism because they are running similar colonial projects themselves.

    Backing/appreciating and even learning from Zionism perhaps (we send our own military and even State and local police to Israel to train with IDF after all), yet they’ll not be led by the nose as we are today.

    • Replies: @Just passing through
  23. @Jim Christian

    Europeans are distinctly disadvantaged in this regards owing to Jews being more or less identical to them phenotypically, if Jews were blue coloured, people would start to notice some patterns. I would say less than one in 50 Whites can identify Jews by their names.

    As a result, there is no racial animus present and lack of this undeniably makes ones feelings less potent. For example, when a group of Blacks attack a White person, a sizeable number of Whites will have a more visceral reaction than if Whites attacked Whites, likewise when a gang of Pakistani Muslims form child sexual exploitation gangs, there is a visceral reaction and the response is intensified by the racial aspect.

    But how about when a group of Jews are caught running a giant Ponzi scheme? Or what about when a group of Jews use their control of mass media to convince 100s of millions into thinking a war with a far away country – that most of the public can’t even identify on the map – is in their best interests, and this war makes their nation much poorer and the world more unsafe?

    Well the reaction to these scenarios is more along the lines of blaming a particular party or ‘conservatives’ and ‘liberals’ blaming the others’ ideology. The debate never has the racial aspects as seen in the Black and Muslim cases. This means the rage is in the end impotent and nobody cares.

    In countries like India and China, Jews are racial outsiders, nobody actually trusts such people and so Jews can never hope to get a stranglehold in their industries, at least nowhere near the extent they can in the Occident. The Chinese are obviously Han centric and in India there is already competition between different castes, coloured people competing and being distrustful of other coloured people, that they wouldn’t even dream of giving their stuff up to people as foreign as Jews.

    The Holocaust (whatever that constitutes) has also not been inculcated into the skulls of Asians from a young age, as a result they don’t react to cries of anti-Semitism like Europeans do, that is to say apologise endlessly and cede ground.

  24. @Anonymous

    I think the Eastern European countries have a complicate relationship with Israel, on one hand they are on cordial terms button the other, they will not obsequiously vow down to Israel as evident by the clashes that happen every now and then, like Russia backing Syrian and Iranian governments or Poland getting into fights regarding the Holocaust.

    These nationals also seem to be retaining their culture despite being pro-Zionist, no mass immigration, no homosexual glorification or child drag queens, no fourth wave feminism etc etc. Hungary kicked out George Soros and his subversive university for example.

    Eastern Europe is definitely more anti-Semitic than Western Europe and the stereotype still holds true, anti-Semitism is not verboten in mainstream politics and politicians regularly make overt or covert references to Jewish power.

    • Replies: @tomo
  25. I prefer not to criticize the aspects which might be lacking in soundness in this article. Even if I had the proper arguments clearly articulated, which I do not right now, my experience with debating the macdonaldites has not been a profitable one.

    The multiple ways in which Jews have sought to deal with this challenge will be addressed in a forthcoming follow-up essay

    I am looking forward to reading it. Maybe this curious passage in a recent Jacobin essay will interest you in regard to that topic:

    Only the Left can offer a real alternative, because only we can offer a political analysis of antisemitism. That analysis must emphasize the fact that, especially when the perpetrators are poor and black, the culprits are white supremacy and capitalism — which benefit precisely by dividing oppressed groups against each other.

    ‘Only the Left Can Defeat Antisemitism’ BY RAPHAEL MAGARIK, https://jacobinmag.com/2020/01/antisemitism-monsey-stabbing-attacks-hannukkah

    They published another one about the same subject matter and an almost identical title:

    ‘To Defeat Antisemitism, We Must Defeat Capitalism’, BY AARON FREEDMAN, https://jacobinmag.com/2020/01/antisemitism-capitalism-new-york-attacks

    The fact that I have severe doubts about MacDonald’s approach does not imply that I do not have just as severe misgivings about the folks at Jacobin. My zone of comfort is around analyses like Philip Giraldi’s, which deal mostly with foreign policy and seem to follow a sensible, traditional approach to problems and would have inequivocal consequences if taken in consideration by a prospective administration (though of course I am not vouching for every thing he has written or will write).

  26. Lot says:
    @Jim Christian

    In defense of women, we all like unearned money.

    • Replies: @Richard B
    , @MBlanc46
  27. In defense of women, we all like unearned money.

    In defense of those of us who do (and are not women), we don’t trade our asses for it..

    • Replies: @theMann
  28. @Just passing through

    With hindsight emancipation was a big mistake in Europe alongside George Washington granting them full rights in the newly established United States.

    Prior to this Jews were easy to identify and treated as aliens and just like Roma. They were also subject to several restrictions and even expulsions.

    Today their presence is akin to mycelium. Added to this the outcome of WWII also serves a shield against any form of critique be it wars in the Middle East, Palestinians or pushing for open borders.

    • Replies: @Just passing through
  29. @Amerimutt Golems

    One of the biggest advantages for Jews brought about by the phenomenon of mass immigration of unassimilable people’s is that they are less conspicuous and the rage of the goyim can he turned towards Mexicans or Syrians.

    Jewish power tends to operate behind the scenes, but when they do make a public appearance on our TV screens, most Whites cannot tell they are Jewish and if they can, onto some of those can view what the Jew on the TV is saying through the lense of suspicion and cynicism (would you trust a man named Alan Dershowitz taking about Iran on Fox News?)

    As for America, Jews were treated as an outside group only when the waves of Jewish immigrants from Eastern Europe came, as many WASP types at the time viewed non North-Western Europeans as inferior (See Madison Grant’s The Passing of the Great Race). The founding fathers seemed to be very philosemitic by all accounts, being freemasons probably ties into that. Benjamin Franklin for example donated money towards building the first permanent synagogue in Philadelphia while George Washington wrote the following in a letter to the Jewish community

    May the Children of the Stock of Abraham, who dwell in this land, continue to merit and enjoy the good will of the other Inhabitants; while every one shall sit under his own vine and fig tree, and there shall be none to make him afraid.

    • Replies: @bluefire
    , @ThreeCranes
    , @renfro
  30. gotmituns says:

    blaxx don’t like whites, orientals, hispanics or differently shaded other blaks. Why should they make an exception of the joos?

  31. One difficulty with this analysis is that blacks hate everybody: yes, Jews, but also gentile whites, Hispanics, and Asians. Therefore it’s difficult to see how any particular significance could be found in their hatred of Jews.

    • Replies: @Twodees Partain
  32. anon[392] • Disclaimer says:
    @Jim Christian

    … Jews think they’re going to be spared by Blacks and Hispanics simply because they’re Jews, well, they’re entitled to their delusions.

    No.
    Jews control all the rackets from the top, all the black and hispanic criminals are essentially their Cadres, and those cadres will be used as Polizei when needed.

    Bottom line: Salvation for the white race from the jews won’t be coming from blacks and hispanics.
    Or Koreans. Or the Chinese, who are also under the thumb of their own criminal networks.

    • Replies: @anon
  33. Anatman says:

    Notice how our Orthodox friend up there in the header photo carries around a flip-phone. Not only are they mote fun to use, but New York City alone has a huge market of what’s known as kosher phone companies selling Rabbi-approved versions of everyone’s favorite addictive gizmo. These are to protect members of the community and especially their children from being exposed to the usual immodesty contained in apps on everyone else’s handheld devices. Once again, Jewish family values outwit goyim degeneracy.

    • Replies: @TKK
  34. bluefire says:
    @Just passing through

    Ever seen these documentaries?

    Riddles in Stone

    The Hidden Faith of The Founding Fathers

    [This one most interests me]
    The New Atlantis
    https://youtu.be/1o-i-09gHX4

    • Replies: @S
  35. @Anonymous

    Kashmir was Hindu before the invasion of Muslims. Xinjiang was also converted to Islam by violence. The “religion of peace” spread by the sword.

    • Replies: @Moi
  36. Over the centuries, Jews have developed strategies for playing both ends against the middle. You may see it coming over here, but miss what they’re also doing over there. Since blacks aren’t particularly bright, they’ll be especially prone to such predation, but be unable to recognize it or articulate it.

    • Replies: @anonymous
  37. @Just passing through

    With a little awareness, it is possible to identify full-blooded Jews by sight alone with both a minimum specificity and sensitivity of around 75 percent, at least when identifying Jewish men. Names are obviously more reliable diagnostic tools still. CNN gold-star management pictorials and the like can be important visual training aides.

  38. Is being “chosen” by the old bearded guy in the sky the main difference between Judaism and Nacism or any other “supremacist” ideology?
    Why there was no “supremacist” before monotheism was brutally forced upon humanity?

  39. DR3 says:

    They ruined the Grand Concourse in the Bronx. Busted out the buildings and turned a once glorious boulevard into a slum.

  40. Dani says:
    @Anonymous

    You are not speaking for anybody in Eastern Europe who counts – you certainly are not speaking for the heart & soul of Eastern Europe, it’s average, humble, hard-working, God-fearing person who is doing his & her best to make ends meet & trying to find some simple happiness in life. Try talking to some of those people, you know, the ignored majority??
    I can’t stand it when people make such broad, sweeping, all-encompassing statements such as yours (“The stereotype of the anti-Jewish Eastern Europe is long gone, if it was ever really true. Today they are the biggest moral supporters of Israel”), based entirely on your own narrow-minded opinion and nothing substantial – and I apply that to ALL of what I quoted from you.
    You don’t speak for all “whites”, either, and I don’t know how much of a prick type you are to say such a thing, at a time when more whites than ever have had it with how things are and know who is ultimately responsible for all of it. I don’t care what you call it – I will never consider myself “anti” ANYBODY simply for speaking the plain and simple truth of what that person/their ilk do, have done, are doing, and most basically, are like as people, and not very good people, either.

  41. Richard B says:
    @Anon

    Not looking good for the Chosen’s ability to bamboozle.

    You’re right. It isn’t.

    In fact, it’s becoming more and more obvious that what we’re really witnessing is nothing less than The Pyrrhic Victory of Jewish Supremacy Inc.

    Because their rise to power has been in direct proportion to the collapse of the very social-institutions that power controls.

    The global civilization we live in now is more complex and unpredictable than any other civilization in human history.

    It simply can not be run on a steady diet of propaganda, censorship, false flags, moral panics and hate hoaxes.

    They might have been good infiltration, subversion, betrayal, destruction and death.

    But they’re no good at social-management, at all.

    • Agree: tomo
    • Replies: @Thomasina
  42. Richard B says:
    @Lot

    Ivanka and Jared.

    Now there’s a match made a little lower than heaven.

    • Replies: @Omegabooks
  43. Richard B says:
    @Lot

    In defense of women, we all like unearned money.

    Talk about universalizing a personal opinion.

    Speak for yourself.

    Only an ignoble person, or people, like unearned money.

    • Replies: @Dannyboy
    , @MollyA
  44. Pheasant says:
    @anon

    ‘i think the big difference between european and middle eastern merchants is that europeans see commerce as a means to an end in other words gain enought to live a prosperous life for middle eateners the activity of the commerce became the end itself where they can dump their personality and will to power’

    Interesting.

  45. theMann says:
    @Jim Christian

    In defense of Women, do (straight) guys even get the opportunity?

    And in any case, every woman who ever gave it up sweet earned it.

    • Replies: @Jim Christian
  46. anon[837] • Disclaimer says:

    One interesting aspect of the human character is people taking out their anger and aggression not on the people directly oppressing them and making their lives a living hell, but on those perceived to be weaker and lower in social status than them. As long as people continue to behave like this, all the blaming of Zionist elites is meaningless, since people have proven themselves to be utterly deficient in intelligence and character. In which case people deserve their ugly fate. I dare anyone to dispute the truth of what I’m saying.

  47. @Just passing through

    If you read between the lines, what Washington is doing is issuing a warning to Jews–mind your own business, obey the rules and you will be left alone to work toward attaining your own well-being.

  48. @neutral

    Blacks do not forget who the owners of the slave ships were been .
    Most of the ship-owners and slave-traders were Jewish.

    It must have its reason why they have over centuries such a bad image.
    Money rules the world.
    The US was sold on December 23rd,1913 as the FED was founded.

    And if you own the media you are setting the theme, control informations and you have the remote.

    In simply every country in History were “certain riots”.

    For examle farmers.Sooner or later a farmer has problems.Because of weather destroys his harvest or his animals are sick or he needs new technique.If he can’t pay his credit…
    In the end the Farmer and his former property belongs to the “giver” of the credit.
    And when the farmer isn’t more than a slave with invisible chains….

    It happened with the farmers, it happened with the US.

  49. @theMann

    And in any case, every woman who ever gave it up sweet earned it.

    True, wives and girlfriends. In this context, it’s women trading their asses to Weinstein for scripts, like Steep, Paltrow and all the girls who said Harvey was their God.

    • Agree: Alfred
    • Replies: @Just passing through
  50. S says:
    @bluefire

    [This one most interests me]
    The New Atlantis

    Whilst Anglosphere ideologies such as the ‘New Atlantis’, the ‘New Rome’, and ‘British Israel’, may not mean much to many of us today, it has historically meant something to some powerful people of the past (and likely present) and is worth study. It helps in understanding what’s going on.

    Great post.

    Washington and London

    Both in Britain and in the USA in the 18th and 19th centuries, aristocratic, oligarchical and anti-democratic forces working within the hierarchical structure of Freemasonry ensconced themselves within the political establishments of those countries – to what end?


    Washington DC – Union Station

    Study of the ideas of the leaders of these forces within Freemasonry reveals that their dream, intention and plan was to create out of Britain and America a New Rome, a new World Empire, a new uniformity of thought and lifestyle that would embrace the whole world. To this end, a new state, the United States of America, was established, the first “world state”, made up of immigrants from all over the world rather than just from one ethnic community – a New Atlantis as intended by the British Elizabethan occultist John Dee, adviser to the Virgin Queen, and by Francis Bacon, James I’s Chancellor, and ruled by a scientific priestly elite. This is how the Freemasons of the Revolutionary and post-Revolutionary generations saw themselves…

    https://majorityrights.com/weblog/comments/the_new_rome_or_the_united_states_of_the_world_1853#c89686

    https://majorityrights.com/weblog/comments/the_new_rome_or_the_united_states_of_the_world_1853

    https://alison-morton.com/2015/06/21/rome-and-washington-dc/

    http://www.revneal.org/Writings/Writings/british.htm

  51. @Jim Christian

    In the same way shiksa’s trade their bodies for a role in the upcoming Jewish Hollywood film, so do the elites give up their souls, working to undermine their own people in return for short term gain from their Jewish paymasters.

    • Agree: Omegabooks
    • Replies: @Moi
  52. Marcus Garvey, who planned to ship African Americans back to Africa, had this to say about his conviction for mail fraud:

    When they wanted to get me they had a Jewish judge try me, and a Jewish prosecutor. I would have been freed but two Jews on the jury held out against me ten hours and succeeded in convicting me, whereupon the Jewish judge gave me the maximum penalty.

    Malcolm X:

    Jews run the country

    The Jew is behind the integration movement, using the Negro as a tool.

  53. “After all, isn’t the Jew the best friend a Black could ask for?”

    No need to rub it in, after all, what ails blacks ails thee as well, i.e. exploitation by the outsider.

    Divide et impera!

  54. @Richard B

    Actually, a “Lot” lower!

    Sorry about that, Lot, but I can’t help getting to a punnery when it comes to ZioShills.

  55. Cassandra says:

    Why use a headline that says blacks are bigoted (antisemitic) toward Jews, yet decry lack of context in reporting legitimate black resentment the article?

  56. renfro says:
    @Just passing through

    One of the biggest advantages for Jews brought about by the phenomenon
    of mass immigration of unassimilable people’s is that they are less conspicuous

    Depending on how you mean conspicuous that is true and not true…. depending on the area of the country.
    Jews seem very conspicuous (behavior wise) in the large metro cities, NY, LA, Miami ,etc. but almost invisible in flyover country and small towns and medium size cities.

    In my town , a semi resort and historic area , we have few Jews and they are mostly retirees from the north. The smattering of native Jews are all merchants, store owners,etc that are never heard from unless it is in some city matter affecting downtown merchants or zoning matters. We have no Jewish owners of real estate firms or development, construction, local industry, or in city management and etc..
    IOW Jews are not on the local radar.
    Which accounts probably for people’s ignorance of what the Uber Jews are up to politically in Washington and elsewhere since most of the population lives outside of metro cities where there are large numbers of Jews who are loudly involved in politics and policies.

    I can remember only one instance when Jews/Israel got local attention. That was when the newspaper published pictures of the carnage of Israel’s assault on Gaza, with an editorial condemning it.

    • Thanks: Alfred
  57. In 2016, local news website Patch published a list of the 100 worst slumlords in Harlem, with the top ten including seven Jews (Mark Silber, Adam Stryker, Joel Goldstein, Marc Chemtob, Moshe Deutsch, Solomon Gottlieb, and Jason Green), a representation that has remained roughly constant every year,

    Looking at the list, there are actually eight Jews on the list. Kobi Zamir is Israeli. Kobi is short for Yakov or Jacob. Zamir is a common Israeli last name.

    The others on the list seem arabic or from some other middle eastern country judging from their last names.

  58. Moi says:
    @Lot

    Nah, white women love black men.

  59. Moi says:
    @Franklin Ryckaert

    So, India under King Asoka became Buddhist–but Buddhism has all but disappeared from India. But nice try at Muslim hatred.

    • Replies: @Shipra
  60. Moi says:
    @Just passing through

    I watched about an hour of the Oscars last night and for a moment thought it was coming from S. Africa. Lots of smart, well-heeled blacks were in the forefront.

    • Replies: @AceDeuce
    , @Jim Christian
  61. Thomasina says:
    @Alexander Turok

    “These same factors also explain the prominence of South and East Asian immigrants in this same economic niche. Like Orthodox Jews, they are culturally distant from the white majority.”

    Get out then!

  62. Thomasina says:
    @anonymous

    Multiculturalism doesn’t work. Not for anybody.

  63. awry says:
    @Anonymous

    These days the most overtly pro-Jew/pro-Zionist countries are the right wing Eastern European countries like Poland, Czech Republic, Hungary and even Russia to a lesser extent.

    The stereotype of the anti-Jewish Eastern European is long gone, if it was ever really true. Today they are the biggest moral supporters of Israel

    Those who are sincere “moral supporters” of Israel are mostly of Jewish extraction themselves so they naturally stand with Israel.
    Don’t confuse the governments with the people, there was no sudden twist, just for example the Hungarian government sees that being friendly with Israel is useful, they very well know how influential the Jews are. For exaample the US ambassador to Hungary (Cornstein) is a zionist Jew, and he is not the first one either. As the governments have a lot of problems with western liberals constantly attacking them, they hope that the Israeli right and the Orthodox Jews (Chabad) can offer some protection against Western liberal attacks. For example under the Obama admin the State dept tried to organize a color revolution against the Orbán govt, it failed. Orbán has had some serious falling out with the GWB admin too during the first Orbán govt (1998-2002), but during the Obama admin it was more serious, as people close to the US power circles openly called for the removal of Orbán by any means necessary, the late Sen McCain called him a “fascist dictator” etc.

  64. Dannyboy says:

    Niggers preying on Jews is funny stuff. It’s kinda like when white shitlibs get raped and killed by niggers.

    In a just world, Jews will be FORCED to live with niggers and Muslims.

    • Troll: Cassandra
  65. SafeNow says:

    To the Jewish traits and behaviors noted above, I would add cringing, clowning, awkwardness, and alienation. Blacks (along with the military) disrespect these even more so than do other groups.

  66. Dannyboy says:
    @Richard B

    Only an ignoble person, or people, like unearned money.

    This bozo Lot is a Shabbos Goy or possibly a Jewrat himself. What do you expect?

  67. Thomasina says:
    @Richard B

    “…what we’re really witnessing is nothing less than The Pyrrhic Victory of Jewish Supremacy Inc.
    Because their rise to power has been in direct proportion to the collapse of the very social-institutions that power controls.”

    Perfectly said.

    Maybe that’s the plan? “We just can’t live with you anti-semitic people!” Next thing they’ll be asking for is their own State.

  68. The jews might need some leadership accepting the realities of true diversity in antisemitism.

  69. SafeNow says:

    To any young commenters who might be unfamiliar with the movie “The Pawnbroker,” this old-timer recommends it. It explores many of these issues, and Rod Steiger’s performance is magnificent.

  70. anon[508] • Disclaimer says:
    @anon

    USA provoked a coup in Honduras.
    Conditions of life became so bad for Hondurans that they fled their country en masse.
    Israel sent 1000 IDF to Honduras
    Fair to predict Jews intend to take over Honduras, while USA gets to be “Jordan” for the “Palestinian” refugees?

    Next question: When does USA become Lebanon – Syria – Iraq – Afghanistan? Will white Christians color-revolution and occupy USA to enable Jews to totally colonize it?

  71. Leftist Mayors encourage this.

    • Replies: @Olorin
  72. AceDeuce says:
    @neutral

    True, but the same can be said for blacks.

  73. anonymous[508] • Disclaimer says:
    @Monotonous Languor

    Since blacks aren’t particularly bright, they’ll be especially prone to such predation, but be unable to recognize it or articulate it.

    Unlike the French, the British, the Dutch, the Poles, Russians, Hungarians and Irish who so presciently saw the schemes of the Jews and successfully resisted them.
    /s

    Germans, Palestinians, Syrians & Iranians are the only people who have “articulated” and, so far, resisted total capitulation to the predators.

    • Replies: @Monotonous Languor
  74. @Colin Wright

    Despite the jewish insistence that they aren’t white, black people lump jews in with white people. That’s an obvious fact to anyone who knows more than one or two black people.

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
  75. An astonishing lack of sociological/anthropological research on this. Get Alice Goffman onto it. She’s quite the expert on Blacks, I hear.

  76. @Twodees Partain

    I have never come across Jews in Australia insisting that they are not white so I may be uninformed about Jews in the US and Europe (leave aside Israel where there are indeed non white Jews). What is your evidence for saying Jews insist on their not being white? Links, sources, quotes, references please.

    • Replies: @Buck Ransom
    , @Anon
    , @jbwilson24
  77. @Moi

    Lots of smart, well-heeled blacks were in the forefront.

    Hollywood did that. It wasn’t as if the Blacks had merit. On any level. Even Howard Stern noticed.

  78. @Just passing through

    I think you are generalizing a priori about India. Think of Sonia Gandh’s acceptance. Think of how easily a very small number of Brits were able to rule, tax and employ sepoys. Think of the Sassoons and also the Parsees.

  79. @Alexander Turok

    Because Reform Judaism soon became dominant amongst US Jews (at least after the great 1880s migration began) you are maybe overlooking the big differences between plain Orthodox and the various Ultra Orthodox sects who are indeed culturally a world away from all other Americans (not to mention most Israelis). Are there not distinctions you should be making?

  80. MBlanc46 says:
    @Lot

    Yeah, but we men no that we’re not going to get any.

  81. @Buck Ransom

    Wow! Now we have been told! I wonder how many American Jews agree with her vehemence.
    …..

    She seems to make cheap debating points she shouldn’t get away with. Her references to imperialism for example sound s bit like a Scot or Irishman blaming the English for imperial opportunities that some of them profited from immensely. Does she disown all the upper class British Jews who thrived as imperialists Rufus Isaacs, first Marquess of Reading and Viceroy of India for example? Sir Isaac Isaacs, first Australian born Governor- General of Australia (and anti-Zionist), General Sir John Monash who commanded the 1st Australian Imperial [sic] Force?

    • Replies: @Buck Ransom
  82. “…but now came the masterful flourish of the pluralist culture — to dissolve into “Whiteness” at will and direct Black anger at that mask instead.”

    A few weeks ago on Saturday Night Live’s Weekend Update skit, Colin Jost mocked Jared Kushner and at the end gave the punchline which referred to him as a privileged white man, rather than a privileged Jew. Your statement is confirmed.

  83. @anonymous

    Arabs aren’t too bright, either. There’s hardly any nuance from them about Jewish strategy. They just hate Jews, regardless.

    Meanwhile, the current crop of Germans are all cucked.

  84. TKK says:
    @Lot

    Israeli men, in particular, still pick up the tab, behave protectively toward women and let their wives have babies instead of competing for scraps in the dreadful workplace.

    Many Jewish women appear smug because they do, indeed, have a much higher quality of life. They are not schlepping to a demeaning rat race job. They are free to organize and perfect the nest, raise children with a plan and care for extended family.

    I see many, many obese sloppy white women who have bred with blacks *walking* to the store with their pitiful mixed breed children lagging behind.

    It’s clear with whom I want my daughter to partner.

    • Replies: @Antonius
    , @Dannyboy
  85. JamesinNM says:
    @Buck Ransom

    Romans 2:28-29 describes real Jews, and Revelation 2:9 and 3:9 describe false Jews: the only definitions that will matter at the final judgement. Read the reader survey titled “Defense of True Israel” at www dot MissionToIsrael dot org web site.

  86. @Buck Ransom

    Thanks. I read the linled Atlantic article too. Seems that 94% give an answer I would regard as common sense but, unless I am missing something, Australian Jews having to conscientiously consider their “white privilege” isn’t and shouldn’t be on anyone’s agenda.

  87. Dannyboy says:
    @TKK

    Do you have to use Mint Listerine several times daily to wash the taste of Jew dick out of your mouth?

    Inquiring minds want to know.

    • Agree: tomo
    • Troll: Twodees Partain
  88. Aldon says:
    @Alexander Turok

    3. Orthodox Jews are open about their desire to preserve endogamy and have a say in who their children have relationships with, and can be so without fear of censure. In contrast, whites gentiles risk severe censure for being open about an opposition to interracial marriage even when it concerns their own children, and, ignoring the race aspect, are much less comfortable telling their children who they can and can’t date based on other factors like low intelligence and conscientiousness. Thus, they seek to affect the future relationships of their children by surrounding them with “acceptable” potential mates and hoping they make the right decision on their own.

    The same goes for Far Easterners and South Asians.

  89. Hibernian says:
    @melpol

    Jew owners

    Using the word “Jew” as an adjective is uaually a sign of Anti-Semitism and/or just plain ignorance. Owning the insult, like a rap musician?

  90. tomo says:
    @Just passing through

    Eastern Europe is definitely more anti-Semitic than Western Europe

    I am from Serbia and maybe I can clarify this – it’s not that we are more anti-semitic (on the contrary we general used to at least when I lived there – like them).
    The reason they are more out of control in the west is because westerners are both more divided AND much easier to bribe than Eastern Europeans (we like money but would not sell our children for a few shekels as say Brits or Americans and Canadians would)

    I have noticed also in countries like Argentina that jews are much better behaved and more social. Mentality, confidence and unity of the host is definitely a huge (probably the biggest ) factor here.

    The reason Jews are generally the most predatory in the F/UK/US countries is because it’s basically the marriage from hell – where you have the masters of fraud, bribing, corruption and psychopathy (jews) meet the easiest and cheapest to bribe sheeple in the world (Anglosheeple).
    In other although ‘poorer’ countries where people are much more meaningfully socially connected and therefore much more confident – jews have a harder time doing their bribing and corruption. They still do it, but it’s harder to achieve the scope they easily achieve in disunited, materialistic, lost countries where people tend to be lonely, disunited and obsessed with trannies and shopping (i.e. USSA)

  91. Shipra says:
    @Moi

    How does stating a fact become ‘Muslim hatred’? Kashmir was Hindu before Islamic invasions led to forcible conversions.

    Additionally, there is no similarity between Kashmir and Palestine. Kashmir is an integral part of India. Kashmiri Muslims and Kashmiri Pandits are Indian citizens. There are no alien people there stealing the land and claiming it as their own.

    What the Modi government is doing there isn’t right – but then they are not doing much good in the rest of the country either.

    P.S. – Buddhism hasn’t disappeared in India. It is widely practiced. And Buddha Jayanti (celebrating Gautam Buddha’s birth) is a Central Govt. holiday in India.

    • Replies: @Moi
  92. Olorin says:
    @CharlieSeattle

    Well, your city, Seattle, saw a 70% increase in jewish population from 2000 to 2014.

    https://www.tabletmag.com/scroll/188781/seattles-jewish-community-grew-70-percent-in-15-years

    https://jewishweek.timesofisrael.com/study-seattles-jewish-population-soared-70-percent-since-2001/

    https://www.jta.org/2015/02/03/united-states/seattles-jewish-population-increased-by-70-percent-since-2001-study-finds-1

    https://www.ijn.com/seattles-jewish-population-soars-70/

    And, oy gevalt, can you even guess what happened before this new millennium Diaspora? I know you can’t, but it was one big meshuggah mess of MISFITTING AND ANTI SEMITISM! A surprise, I know, but given that the writer starts off this massive piece by sharing details of his genital mutilation, he’s gotta take it somewhere suitably anguished.

    While of course informing readers of this local weekly that they’re wrong to think Seattle isn’t in fact very jewish, they’re just not in on it and THEY are the misfits.

    https://www.thestranger.com/seattle/the-jewish-problem/Content?oid=122431
    http://archive.is/UmAQM

  93. Moi says:
    @Shipra

    What source do you have that states Kashmir Hindus were forcibly convert to Islam???

    Also, don’t give the crap that India is a secular country. India is secular by its constitution but not in practice.

  94. In the Protocols of the Elders of Zion for Dummies*, Maurice Samuel explains:

    “Jews and friends of Jews have wanted to make it appear that, if we differ from you ethically, it is in that we are more self-sacrificing, more generous, more loyal, more honest, etc. I do not desire to make it appear so, and in the foregoing pages I have tried to avoid any such implication. Within our system we need be neither better nor worse behaved than you within yours. We may transgress as frequently as you, perhaps more frequently – I cannot tell: it is on the nature of the systems that I base the distinction. We deny your very system, you ours…

    For your system of morality is no less a need to you than ours to us. And the incompatibility of the two systems is not passive… the misfortune is that the two are not merely different. They are opposed in mortal, though tacit, enmity. No man can accept both, or, accepting either, do otherwise than despise the other…

    All your society is divided into “teams” – with fictitious morality to correspond. It has little to do with direct utilitarianism… We Jews cannot play the game.

    END QUOTE

    P.S. I noticed a typo on the cover of the 2018 Commentary magazine titled, “African Americans vs. American Jews”. Should it not read “… Jewish Americans” or is that changing the subject?

    *Otherwise known as You Gentiles, by Maurice Samuel, 1924, Chapter 5, Loyalty.
    https://ia802701.us.archive.org/4/items/pdfy-72V_H1O23zyMfHim/You%20Gentiles.pdf

  95. Anon[873] • Disclaimer says:
    @Wizard of Oz

    What is your evidence for saying Jews insist on their not being white? Links, sources, quotes, references please.

    “What is your evidence”, followed by demands for references, is generally a question for a situation wherein the evidence is difficult to find, vague, or not widely known for one side of a contentious issue.

    This is because this question generally implies that the evidence is difficult to come across and perhaps less than conclusive.

    This is not that.

    Jewish dissaciation from “Whiteness” has been declared in multiple articles in recent years, in MSM outlets such as the Washington Post. Some articles have been written by Orthodox Rabbis.

    Its also implied in incessant institutional Jewish attack on Whiteness and racism.

    The latter being wholly, thinly veiled code for attacks on the political assertion of the Rights of anyone with White skin against those asserting Rights based on non-White skin. Even merely in response.

    Institutional Judaism does not attack itself, and to avoid doing that while attacking gentile Whites it must deny being representative of political Whiteness. This is obvious logic.

    A simple google search would turn up all the “evidence” you require, and you wouldn’t have had to embarrass yourself on this basic issue by demanding that another poster play fetch.

    Your demand is equivalent to demanding evidence for the composition of the atmosphere. The composition is simple fact. You do not require someone to fetch “evidence”. What you require is a search engine to find the fact of the matter, much as you would do to find statements as to the composition of the atmosphere.

    Jews are a White sub-race (defined by generally high hominid admixture), which genetically organizes under the false umbrella of religion that is international racial supremacism and nothing more. There is nothing actually religious or spiritual in Judaism. They don’t believe in an afterlife nor any real continuity of the soul aside from its existence as represented by the continuity of the Jewish race. The Jewish equivalent of Heaven is future World domination in a new Golden Age (which is reflected in their deeming their time in Spain, after the Islamic conquest that they assisted, a “Golden Age” – and they are now assisting the Muslims to achieve the same thing on a large scale – the prophetical motivation which can be found in Zohar Shemot 32a among other places). All of their religious belief is allegory for racial war on Earth, as typified by the Jewish “War in Heaven” between the Jewish god and all other tribal Gods.

    Jews are “White” in some superficial sense, but it sure as heck is not the political one. Its not even the strictly racial sense, if we choose to define the White race by a relative lack of hominid admixture. Which arguably may be the most accurate way to define it, on a continuum of relative admixture.

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
  96. MollyA says:
    @Richard B

    There have been countless ignoble men (and women) down through history, some of them known to me. I have often heard the phrase, “have to find a man with money” but never knew of anyone that actually did. They all continued to work and in the past 10 years are often the main support of the family. Nobody wants money or things they didn’t earn. Sooner or later it turns into hell, like that Twilight Zone where the criminal got killed and apparently went to heaven replete with everything he wanted forever. Then he gets bored and says, I want to go to the other place. Turns out–he was already in the “other place.” That’s unearned stuff, and uselessness. Pure existential hell.

  97. @Wizard of Oz

    “What is your evidence for saying Jews insist on their not being white? Links, sources, quotes, references please.”

    Goddamn you are lazy. There’s something called Jewgle

    https://images.shulcloud.com/3218/uploads/PDF-Files/Rabbi-corner/Im-Not-White-Im-Jewish.pdf
    https://blogs.timesofisrael.com/we-european-jews-never-passed-as-white/
    https://www.villagevoice.com/2019/07/25/the-white-issue-jews-are-not-white/
    https://blogs.timesofisrael.com/ashkenazi-jews-are-not-white-response-to-haaretz-article/

    https://newbostonpost.com/2018/02/22/incoming-harvard-president-attacked-as-white-male/

    Says Ira Stoll: “As the grandson of a Jewish immigrant from Minsk myself, I’ve got experience with this issue. Personally, when the racial record-keepers ask me to check a box, I don’t go with “white,” but put “other” and write in “Jew.””

    Perhaps you’d like a PhD thesis written for your benefit? A peer reviewed paper? Gold foil, illustrated manuscript?

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
  98. @Anon

    I should perhaps have explained my question at greater length. It was really to find out which Jews were being referred to as it seemed to have nothing to do with most Australian Jews.

  99. @jbwilson24

    See my immediately preceding reply to Anon on the same subject. Come to think of it I suspect that it is not just the average Australian Jew who would scoff at the idea of Ashkenazim not being white but the young generations in NYC as well. I have a young relation at Columbia who knows lots of Jews. I must ask about her generation. Not that they are anything but good tribal Jews who support Israel and wouldn’t marry out!

  100. @anonymous

    You left out one group blacks hate: Other blacks.

  101. I should think you could do better than being a MacDonald clone, Mr. Joyce!

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Andrew Joyce Comments via RSS
PastClassics
The “war hero” candidate buried information about POWs left behind in Vietnam.
Are elite university admissions based on meritocracy and diversity as claimed?
Our Reigning Political Puppets, Dancing to Invisible Strings