The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 Lance Welton Archive
Are Women, Like New Zealand’s Ardern—or Gays, Like U.S. Dems’ Buttigieg—REALLY Suited to Politics?
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information


Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern was “wearing a cream headscarf” a.k.a. a hijab when she greeted Prince William this week. [‘You showed how to respond to hate – with love’: Prince William gives stirring speech at Christchurch mosque where 42 were killed – as he tells survivors ‘we must unite’ to fight terrorism, by Ben Hill,,uk., April 25, 2019]

Her notoriously emotional reaction to the Mosque massacre is an extreme example, but there is little question that female involvement alters the nature of politics. It is perhaps unsurprising, then, that a recent study by Georgetown University has found a significant number of people still believe that women shouldn’t hold high political office. [May the Best Woman Win?, by Anthony P. Carnevale et al., Georgetown University, 2019 (PDF)] Could they be right?

According to the study, 13% of people still answer the question “Are men better suited emotionally for politics than most women?” affirmatively—down from around 50% in the mid-1970s, but still striking after fifty years of relentless Politically Correct propaganda and SJW enforcement. And, as the authors of the study lament, “in races as close as those of the recent past, even a small bias can make a big difference.”

Interestingly, as many women agree with the proposition as men. This has been roughly the case over time. And there is little age difference in the strength with which it is held. Of those surveyed, 16% of women over 35 and 13% of women under 35 believed that “men were better suited emotionally for politics.”

There is, however, a big class difference. The research group found that:

Americans with less than a high school diploma are almost twice as likely as those with a bachelor’s degree—and nearly three times as likely as those with a master’s degree or higher—to doubt women’s emotional suitability for politics.

Nevertheless, an unreconstructed (deplorable?) 7% of Americans with Master’s degrees or higher still told the pollsters that men are emotionally better suited to politics than women.

Needless to say, the Main Stream Media is aghast that anybody could still think such unthinkable thoughts in the Current Year. For example: “Are women ‘too emotional’ for public office? Even after Trump, some people believe that”, by Amanda Marcotte, Salon, April 16, 2019]. Having led with this obviously fallacious “appeal to anecdote” and “faulty generalization” in which a sample of one undermines a robust stereotype, Marcotte writes:

. . . we’re subject to daily, often hourly reminders that Trump has lived on earth for 72 years and still has the impulse and emotional control of an especially trying toddler. Despite all this, however, significant numbers of Americans — and Trump voters in particular — still believe that’s it’s women who do not possess the emotional maturity required of those who seek high office.

In terms of the veracity of stereotypes based on a sample of one person, we might ask, “Is it a coincidence that this fallacious, emotion-driven diatribe has emanated from a woman, and one of Italian ancestry at that?”

In fact, of course, there is an enormous amount of evidence that “stereotypes” are generally empirically accurate. [Social Perception and Social Reality: Why Accuracy Dominates Bias and Self-Fulfilling Prophecy, by Lee Jussim, 2012]

Interestingly, blacks have been generally more likely than whites to say women are less suited for politics. And Republicans, men and women alike, have been generally more likely to be doubtful of women in politics (currently 30 %). But even about 10% of Democrats still agree.

The decline in Americans willing to tell pollsters they are dubious of women in politics a shame, because there is abundant data indicating sound empirical reasons for these “outdated” and “sexist” attitudes which are held even by 10% of Democrat voters.

It is a simple fact that females are more “emotionally unstable” than males. Psychological analyses all agree that by the time females reach adulthood, they are significantly higher in the personality trait “Neuroticism” than are males of the same age. [See Age differences in personality traits from 10 to 65: Big Five domains and facets in a large cross-sectional sample, by C. Soto et al., Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2011].

Neuroticism is characterized by “feeling negative feelings strongly,” with the opposite of Neuroticism being “Emotional Stability.” Such “Negative Feelings” include sadness, anger and jealousy. But females score particularly strongly on “anxiety”—possibly because, in prehistory, the children of anxious, protective mothers were less likely to get seriously injured. But the key point is that the stereotype is correct.

And people are also correct to think that women —that is, those who, on average, score higher in Neuroticism—will be less able to cope in the brutal world of power-politics.

Successful politicians —the ones who get into their country’s legislature but don’t make it to the very top—score significantly lower than the general public in Neuroticism, according to research published in the leading psychology journal Personality and Individual Differences. [The personalities of politicians: A big five survey of American legislators, by Richard Hanania , 2017]

And this research reveals something very interesting indeed. These “successful politicians,” while being more emotionally stable than most voters, score higher in the personality traits Extraversion (“feeling positive feelings strongly”), Conscientiousness (“rule-following and impulse control”) and Agreeableness (“altruism and empathy”).

But this does not tend to be true of those who reach the very top of politics—and especially not of those who are perceived as great, world-changing statesmen. They tend to be highly intelligent but above average on quite the opposite personality traits – psychopathology and Narcissism [Creativity and psychopathology, by F. Post British Journal of Psychiatry, 1994]. However, high Agreeableness, Conscientiousness and Extraversion are true of successful politicians in general.

In much the same way, run-of-the-mill scientists are above average in Agreeableness and Conscientiousness but genius scientists combine being relatively low in these traits with stratospheric intelligence. This gives them creativity, drive and fearless to be original. [At Our Wits’ End, by Edward Dutton and Michael Woodley of Menie, 2018, Ch. 6]

This is important, because these are typically female traits: women score higher than men in Agreeableness, Consciousness and Extraversion. This means that, in general, we would expect the relatively few females who do reach high political office to be fairly atypical women: low in mental instability and certainly moderately low in altruism, empathy or both—think Margaret Thatcher, who according to Keith Patching in his 2006 book Leadership, Character and Strategy, was organizing her impending Bar Finals from her hospital bed having just had twins; or even Theresa May. Neither of these British Prime Ministers have (or had) neither of whom have particularly “feminine” personalities, though they may reflect (or have reflected) very pronounced Conscientiousness, a trait associated with social conservatism. [Resolving the “Conscientiousness Paradox”, by Scott A. McGreal, Psychology Today, July 27, 2015]

But, sometimes, a female politician’s typically anxiety will apparently be “compensated” for i.e. overwhelmed by her having massively high Agreeableness and Conscientiousness. This likely occurred in the case of Jacinda Ardern, who suffers from intense anxiety to the point of having being hospitalized.

This will become a problem in a time of crisis when, as happened with Ardern, such a politician will become over-emotional. This, combined with very high empathy, would seem to partly explain Ardern’s self-identification with New Zealand’s Muslims to the extent of donning a head scarf and breaking down in public.

But it also explains why females, on average, tend to be more left-wing than males and more open to refugees. They feel empathy and even sadness for the plight of the refugees more strongly than do men [Young women are more left wing than men, study reveals, by Rosalind Shorrocks, The Conversation, May 3, 2018

This means that there will be a tendency for females to push politics Leftwards and make it more about empathy and other such “feelings.” It also means that, in a serious crisis, they may well even empathise with the enemy.

In that gay men are generally feminized males, this problem help would to explain why people are skeptical of the suitability of homosexual men for supposedly “masculine” professions (such as politics) [The extreme male brain theory of autism, by Simon Baron-Cohen, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2002], sometimes including political office. [The Hidden Psychology of Voting, by Zaria Gorvett, BBC News, May 6, 2015]

Supporters of gay Democrat Pete Buttigieg’s campaign for his party’s presidential nomination [Protester Shouts “Sodom and Gomorrah” at Gay 2020 Dem Pete Buttigieg, by Tyler O’Neil, PJ Media, April 17, 2019] should, perhaps, take note . . .

Lance Welton [Email him] is the pen name of a freelance journalist living in New York.

(Republished from VDare by permission of author or representative)
• Category: Ideology • Tags: Feminism, Gays/Lesbians, Political Correctness 
Hide 175 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. What about Science and Technology? Are they suited for that? Maybe science could use a little more wisdom and conscientiousness.

    J Robert Oppenheimer, the genius Physics professor, was known to be “temperamental” and not suited for high stress assignment. So, along with several other genius’s, some who came over from Germany, he presided over the making of the A-bomb. Hallelujah……just kidding.

    There’s an excellent book that covers J Robert Oppenheimer and the making of the A-bomb called “American Prometheus: The Triumph and Tragedy of J Robert Oppenheimer”.
    The guy was totally volatile and emotionally unstable. While in school he left a knife in an apple on his teacher’s desk that he did not like.

    After the bomb was dropped on JAPAN, in a documentary much later, he is shown with tears in his eyes quoting the Bhagavad Gita: “Now I am become death, destroyer of worlds”.

    A couple decades or so later there were interviews of some of these guys who were part of the project and they were crying. They had the GENIUS to build such a monstrosity, but seemed to have failed to understand the impact it would make on the world; breaking down in tears when talking about it. They had no clue or ability of Foreknowledge. What would have happened if more women were on the team? Would we all be annihilated by now? Or maybe no a-bomb would have been made? Who knows….

  2. Interesting. And I appreciate the citations to sources. But I find that interpretation of psychiatric traits is a bit like reading tea leaves: there is a temptation to cherry-pick one’s preferred quotes and conclusions. For me, this article would have been stronger if it had followed a recognized authority’s path through the Big Five personality traits.

    • Replies: @Anon
  3. SOL says:

    Feminism is dyscivic.

    • Agree: Thomm
    • Replies: @anon
  4. It seems rather unfair to pick a moron like Jacinda Ardern to represent all female politicians. And even though when it comes to foreign policy, I’ll take a Tulsi Gabbard over any male politician like Rubio, Graham, Schumer, Pence, Trump, Pompeo, Bolton…any day, I will have to say, in general, you’re right, the crop of female politicians we’ve seen today do not inspire confidence in women as politicians, not just in the US but Merkel, May…yikes. But women had been good heads of states in the past, like Margaret Thatcher and Queen Victoria. But they were the exceptions rather than the rule.

    Also agree that gays make for bad politicians. Even though their moral degeneracy and drama queen antics make politics look like a natural fit, their extreme narcissism means they will always get sidetracked and can’t stay focused. The only thing any gay man cares about is his gayness. Plus no one outside the western world will ever give them an ounce of respect. Picture Buttplug showing up in a muslim country as POTUS, with his husband! Either they’ll get stoned to death which will get us into war or the US will be the laughing stock of the world. And then of course he’d have to go bomb some country just to prove his manhood, getting us into more unnecessary wars. No gays for politics, ever.

    • Replies: @TKK
    , @Che Guava
    , @Mr McKenna
    , @Paw
  5. Anon[192] • Disclaimer says:

    Are Homosexuals Suited for Politics?


    Oh, you really meant to ask Are Homosexuals Suited for Governance?

    • Replies: @Dr. Krieger
  6. Dan Hayes says:


    There has been a very successful effort to paint Oppenheimer as a secular saint. But Princeton’s John Archibald Wheeler stated that he never trusted Oppenheimer. So what? Because JAW was notorious for otherwise saying nice things about almost everyone else, especially his academic rivals. Also JAW happily and productively worked on the US H-bomb project which was embargoed by Oppenheimer and his many disciples.

    • Replies: @freedom-cat
  7. SafeNow says:

    I agree with the point made above, that, in our nuclear age, behavior in a crisis is the most important personality trait. I think that men’s crisis-calmness can suffer from macho/ego, and with women, from anxiety and panic. Democratic candidate Amy K reportedly throws things when angry, and to me, this is disqualifying. Assuming no nuclear destruction, the analysis is this: We have devolved into a gigantic banana republic/soft dictatorship; whose personality constellation is best suited to politics in a banana republic?

  8. Thomm says:

    No female leader of any country, ever, has been particularly good, except one.

    And that one was only because she was fortunate enough to be the PM of the UK at the same time as Ronald Reagan was President of the US. He was handholding every single decision of hers. Reagan was effectively running two countries (the #1 and #4 largest GDPs in the world at that time). At least she was smart enough to let him tell her exactly what to do.

    Given this dataset, no, women are not suitable for very high political office.

  9. Is Ardern still wearing that hijab in order to cynically manipulate her insipid voters? Anyway…

    I have come to realize that women, on the whole, tend to be poorly suited to many traditionally male-doninated activities. Politics, for sure. Very few good, dependable female politicians come to mind. But the list at my immediate recall that are emotional, vapid, destructive slobs—Angela Merkel, Cristina Fernández de Kirchner, Eva Perón, Michelle Bachelet, Isabel Allende Bussi, Annie Lööf, Anne Hidalgo, Ursula von der Leyen, Maxine Waters, Nancy Pelosi, Rashida Tlaïb, Alexandra Ocasio-Cortez, et al—seems practically limitless. Not only is the fairer sex not adept at political leadership, but they are ill-suited to even vote rationally. The weakness of Anglo-American men’s resolve against the suffragettes was the beginning of the end.

    Preeminent excellence seems to elude the grasp of women in a number of other careers. For whatever reason, there are few women writers of prose fiction that can equal the heights men have reached in that field. This despite the fact that the contemporary literary industry is overwhelmingly dominated by women. True, there are the rare instances of female literary transcendence in the guise of a Clarice Lispector, Hilda Hilst, Okamoto Kanoko, Murasaki Shikibu, Unica Zürn, and so on. But they tend to be the exceptions that prove the rule. (On the other hand, women seem naturally gifted at lyric expression, with great female poets existing since at least Sappho.)

    Orchestral conducting, too, is a field wherein women cannot produce an equal or better of, say, a Furtwängler, Mengelberg, or Beecham. There are plenty of them around today—all lousy. (To be fair, though, nearly all living conductors today—male or female—are lousy.)

    • Replies: @T1970
    , @Alden
    , @anonymous
  10. Teacup says:

    I’m a university degree holding woman, of the traditional type with XX chromosomes, and since I was a teen some forty years ago, I’ve thought that men are better suited for politics. Not that a few women can’t do it successfully (Thatcher and British Queens for examples) but that it’s a profession far more suited to men, being as many are more naturally mentally strong, steady and rational, and not as given to bursts of emotion and utopian fancies as women can often be. In fact, I’d be delighted if only U.S. born citizen male property owners over the age of 25 were allowed to vote. How’s that for being a Dissident?

    • Replies: @Mr McKenna
  11. Franz says:

    Unstable and then some, I’d say:

    A portion of an interview given by Oppenheimer after the test of first atomic bomb – code named Trinity in New Mexico, USA:

    “We knew the world would not be the same. A few people laughed, a few people cried. Most people were silent. I remembered the line from the Hindu scripture, the Bhagavad-Gita, ‘Now I am become Death, the destroyer of worlds.’ I suppose we all thought that, one way or another.”

    ― J. Robert Oppenheimer (American theoretical physicist, Often referred to as the “father of the atomic bomb”)

    Plus, Oppenheimer, according to old Soviet archives discovered by Henry Stevens, was an agent codename “Dasher” and pretty much had a free pass from the Roosevelt Administration to give nuclear secrets to Stalin. Not just him, either. Enrico Fermi had a Soviet codename too.

    Stevens is mostly a dry technical researcher about what Hitler’s scientists had/didn’t have but that part was a bit of a revelation. In: Hitler’s Suppressed and Still-Secret Weapons, Science and Technology .

    • Replies: @Mr McKenna
    , @Wizard of Oz
  12. anon[110] • Disclaimer says:

    Civ(citi)lization is dishuman. When soccer moms can drive Suburbans with the power of WW1 tanks, there’s no end to their destructive power.

  13. Young You-tuber Eli Harman has a good take on this. ‘Politics is War by Other Means’ is not a simple cliché, it has major consequences. First is that parleys have always been a way to defray martial losses. Second is that, a la Chagnon, possession of women is what men fight for ; they do not fight alongside women. Third is that politics grows out of the martial parley and other negotiatory structures for distributing resources such as women. Fourth is that politics must always be backed by a credible threat of violence: war by other means. It therefore follows that women and gay men, men who will not struggle to possess women, have not earned a place in political decision-making; they are parasitic to the process. Modern life may seem many steps away from all this, but in reality it’s only one or two.

    • Replies: @Dave Bowman
  14. @Thomm

    I’ve never heard that version of Reagan and Thatcher though I’ve heard it the other way round as e.g. Mrs T did apparently tell the Pres that Gorbachev was someone that he could do business with. Mrs T had been PM for almost two years before Reagan was sworn in so you may excuse me asking you to provide something to dispel the impression that you are purveying fantasy about their relationship. Mind you my BS detector is primed by having met her at No.10 and also known quite well several people who worked closely with her when she was PM.

    • Replies: @NoseytheDuke
    , @Thomm
  15. There are a lot of commenters on UR who rely on obscure sources but my Googling “Robert Oppenheimer Soviet dasher Henry Stevens” has been quite unable to find anything to support your intriguing idea. Do you think there is a serious case to be made or are you just giving us the benefit of a bit of gossip?

    • Replies: @HallParvey
  16. @Thomm

    He was handholding every single decision of hers


    What are you talking about? She had been in office almost two years when Reagan was inaugurated. He had nothing to do with the Falklands War, other than trying to talk her out of it.

    • Replies: @Mr McKenna
  17. Anon[243] • Disclaimer says: • Website

    No worse than cucks like Pence and kooks like Bolton.

    • Agree: Moi
  18. renfro says:

    I thinks its time we elected a woman to the WH.
    The female ‘house keeping’ gene might lead to cleaning out the swamp.
    None of men we’ve elected have ever been able to do that job.

  19. Humans should not be in politics.

    All taxes should be flat taxes, all welfare save defense and education should be UBI, and those should be run by military people and teachers respectively. The nation should be armed and neutral. The % of GDP spent on welfare should be determined by directly democratic referenda.

    The remaining free market should be regulated by experts in controling market failure such as systemic risk and externalities (controlled by adding +ive or -ive VAT to goods/services).

    Whatever scraps are left for politicians should be managed in a semi directly democratic manner, so politicians have no truly final say on any law – because representatives are a natural oligarchy, which should be as limited in scale as possible.

    • Agree: Thomm, Fox
  20. @Thomm


    Thatcher was elected in early 1979, more than a year before Reagan was elected in 1980/1981.

    I was 7 years old when Reagan came to office in 1981.

    It was a tight election; Carter was close.

    Thatcher was elected for different reasons. Socialism had run UK into the ground; US was suffering from stagflation and also the Contra crisis.

    Thatcher and Reagan were politically similar and politically-allied during the Cold War so in that respect you are right. But Thatcher was first.

  21. sb says:

    I rather think it was the other way around with Thatcher and Reagan .
    But I think you are unmovable on this topic

  22. Georg says:

    Arthur Schopenhauer:
    “Man reaches the maturity of his reasoning and mental faculties scarcely before he is eight-and-twenty; woman when she is eighteen; but hers is reason of very narrow limitations. This is why women remain children all their lives, for they always see only what is near at hand, cling to the present, take the appearance of a thing for reality, and prefer trifling matters to the most important. It is by virtue of man’s reasoning powers that he does not live in the present only, like the brute, but observes and ponders over the past and future; and from this spring discretion, care, and that anxiety which we so frequently notice in people.”

    For Arden, the attack in Christchurch boiles down to a very simple fact: a crazy gunman killed 50 innocent, defenseless people. She is simply incapable of calculating the log-term effects of her beaviour (muslim immigration, censorship, submissive gestures toward islam, suppression of freedom).

    Same with Merkel: “Oh my god, these poor immigrants!”. 100’s of Billions of Euros and a probably irreversible destabilization of german society simply does not count in such a moment.

    On gays: the female type of gays (the “woman with a penis” cohort) usually will have the same restrictions.

    As always with humans: there is no 100% separation, but some overlap. There are (straight) politicians of both sexes, which behave like the opposite sex (e.g. Thatcher, who had more balls than most of her male counterparts; OTOH, many male top EU politicians behave very female).

    • Replies: @jeff stryker
  23. MoH says:

    This is absolutely the type of article I would like to see more of. Women are useful to the globalist regime as they are so pliable to present the narrative. One of the key difference’s between men and women is that women are far better with what is close, such as in the home. Men are far better in seeing the bigger picture of what’s going on. Men are more likely to see the globalist regime for what it is and this is one of the many reasons why the globalist regime discriminate’s against them so.

    We are the products of evolutionary psychology. Women are better at the closer up due to the raising of children. Men are better at the further away due to the need to protect the tribe. This is how our speices developed. The regime knows this too and exploits our differences for its own ends. Spending trillions on propaganda to indoctrinate us away from who we really are.

  24. MoH says:

    Thatchers purpose was to deindustrialise the UK to turn this country into a service based economy. It also had the purpose of making men weaker, not just due to the more feminised work, but in terms of bargaining power and the bonds of friendship men had in industrial type jobs. Thatcher did recognise the EU project for what it was and after ‘No! No! No!’, she was kicked out and the pliable Major was put in place instead. Agreed she wasn’t a feminist and had some good attributes but she was their puppet discarded when she showed some backbone

    • Replies: @Feryl
  25. TKK says:
    @You can't handle the truth

    Picture Buttplug showing up in a muslim country as POTUS, with his husband! Either they’ll get stoned to death which will get us into war or the US will be the laughing stock of the world. And then of course he’d have to go bomb some country just to prove his manhood, getting us into more unnecessary wars. No gays for politics, ever.

    That’s one more fantastic point. Never thought of that. The loss of face and respect could never be recovered. It doesn’t matter that many Muslim men love sex with young boys ( undisputed) – marrying a man is unthinkable. Some heads of state ( Brunei) would refuse to meet with Buttplug.

    It seemed the same with Obama- Western countries fawned over his election- but you picked up on the vibe: they actually elected a black? No other Western country has or will do it.

    The basket case of Sub Sahara Africa is enough evidence of their innate sub human values or systemic ability to turn functioning cities into wasteland.

    But – Not sure if he was genuinely elected. He was mysteriously put in office.

    • Replies: @Republic
  26. Polar says:

    Female politicians are a laughingstock at best to a tragedy at worst.

    The problem is that men are no better. Former CIA spook John Brennan converted to Islam but fewer people realize this because he doesn’t go around in a hijab because he is male. Same with other male crypto-Muslim politicians and bureaucrats.

    Even Donald Trump, the symbol of male virtue, has worked for Jews and Israel to the detriment of his own race and country.

    Would someone please explain how being a lifestyle race play submissive including cuckoldry is somehow masculine and virtuous before making the argument why it is better to be lead by men into that stuff rather than women.

  27. There are far more male geniuses than female. But on the other end of the IQ spectrum, there are far more male idiots than female.

    • Replies: @atlantis_dweller
  28. I suppose that, if one is dissatisfied with the current political status quo and ideology, and would wish to destabilize it, the best path for accomplishing that goal would be to elect unstable people for high offices.

  29. @Wizard of Oz

    Thatcher was a complete disaster and a cloying social climber as well. Strauss and Howe write in The Fourth Turning that the Reagan/Thatcher revolution was a turning point in our lifetime, and they didn’t mean it as a compliment. Both were spectacular suck-ups to those that they considered to be their “betters” as they betrayed those who put their trust in them. Perhaps you’ll be reunited with Maggie in Hell, Whizzy.

    • Agree: Iris
    • Replies: @Anon
    , @Wizard of Oz
  30. @Anon

    I agree with you. It seems that women and gays are both perfectly suited to politics, as it exists today.

    Neither are suited to governance.

  31. @Georg


    Throughout civilization males who conquer other males simply walk away with the women who are hottest and ignore the rest.

    So women won’t go down with the ship like males.

    Take Native Americans in the US. The squaws could simply marry Englishman; while the males were out of luck since few English or Spanish explorers were gay.

  32. Republic says:

    re: Buttigieg:

    But – Not sure if he was genuinely elected. He was mysteriously put in office.

    No mystery about Buttigieg, the same people who selected Obama for high office,selected him.

    His neighbor,Dr E Michael Jones wrote a book about this politician in “Home Alone: A Neighbor’s Thoughts About Pete Buttigieg”, and why his presidential campaign is being supported by the oligarchs.

    Jones is an expert in analyzing how sexual liberation is now being used as a form of political control

    • Agree: TKK
  33. Anon[424] • Disclaimer says:

    Hahhahahhahahaha , congratulations and thanks to Lance Welton and to Ron Unz for the present article . A tribute to their courage . It takes a lot of courage to say that ” the king is naked ” .

  34. The zionists who control the US have used gays to change the American culture to destroy the family and this fits in with their plan as revealed in The Protocols of Zion along with the LGBTQ agenda which is all designed and pushed by the zionists to destroy America.

    • Replies: @jeff stryker
  35. anonymous[296] • Disclaimer says:

    Would a Muslim politician walk around with a crucifix around his neck after one of their incidents of Christians being targeted? Not hardly. The answer is no, they’re not suited. Look at Merkel who almost single-handedly ruined her own country. The stakes are too high in all this to take such chances.

  36. With a handful of obvious exceptions, women should not be involved in serious politics. Weepy, hand-wringing, pearl-clutching old hags are not fit to lead a serious country.

    As for homosexualists, they are mentally disturbed. A man who masturbates into another man’s anus or trolls public toilets for companionship is probably not the guy you want with his hand on the nuclear button. Mayor Butt is a nut, in short, and has no business running for mayor of South Bend, much less president of the USA.

    • Replies: @jeff stryker
    , @TKK
    , @Republic
  37. Anon[424] • Disclaimer says:
    @Ray Woodcock

    The ” big five ” model is completely useless in the clinic , nobody uses it in the clinic anymore .

    Cloninger got famous academically in the 90`s preaching the ” big five ” . Millions of useless
    papers about Cloninger`s ” big five ” test were published in the West for a few years and then the ” big five ” fell into oblivion .

    Yes , the ” academic ” research ” bubble is even worse then the Wall Street bubbles .

    Psychological masturbation .’s_Psychobiological_Model_of_Temperament_and_Character_and_the_Five-Factor_Model_of_Personality

  38. To be suited to exercise power. What does it mean but to be able to earn it and hold it?
    Anyone who does is suited to do it, and those who don’t probably aren’t.

  39. @joeshittheragman

    That applies to most psychological attributes. Honesty, introspection, … everywhere the distribution curves look the same. And men on the far right end of it suffer loneliness.

  40. It is also worth noticing, as someone did up here, how thin the nexus between political offices and governance.
    Politics is fiction, as is information, as must be anything mainstream.

  41. Anonymous[350] • Disclaimer says:

    I have no problem with gay politicians as long as they’re not gay activists.

    Anyone with a bit of life experience knows that women are much less capable of objectivity than men (on average). High neuroticism and high agreeableness leads them to latch on and emotionally connect with (what they perceive as) dominant persons and dominant group zeitgeist.

    This is fairly logical in evolutionary terms. When Paris fell to the Germans, it didn’t take long before its women started dating the winners. Same thing happened in Berlin a few years later. They adapted by submitting and actually changing their convictions to fit the new (world) order of things. That’s why Taliban women and SanFran feminists have a reputation for fanaticism.

    This is a problem now because the globalists have a lot of money and power to throw around and their shiny brochures are filled with feel-good tales of hugging the world and unstoppable inevitability. That’s catnip to the fairer sex. The current feminist Swedish government is a prime example of a herd of women happily diving off a cliff because it feels good. All hard data and objective analysis shows the cliff ahead but the heart wants what the heart wants.

    TL;DR: Almost all women are followers even in (nominally) leadership positions.

    • Replies: @freedom-cat
  42. “Americans with less than a high school diploma are almost twice as likely as those with a bachelor’s degree—and nearly three times as likely as those with a master’s degree or higher—to doubt women’s emotional suitability for politics. ”

    All this proves is that those “less educated” men have not been subjected to an intensive indoctrination curriculum that brainwashes other men into rejecting basic and obvious realities about the differences between the two sexes.

    But the more fundamental question is: Are females and homosexuals suited for leadership, and the answer is going to be 99 times out of 100 a resounding “no.”

    There is never a situation where a female should ever be in charge of, or within the ranks of, fighting men, or even working men (by working I mean laboring or operating) to any degree of separation, for very obvious reasons. The same goes for homosexuals.

  43. @Desert Fox


    If this is the case, why aren’t Jewish families destroyed by gays? See, Jews in America are (I assume as a non-Jew) being exposed to the same forces as non-Jews.

    Gays themselves have no interest in families, do they? Yes, they have parades but in general sense they have no interest in women or having kids, why would families matter to them?

    Finally, since Jews have such a good gig in America, why kill the host?

  44. @Chris Bridges


    You make a valid point about the sanity of homosexuals.

    Let’s look at textbook George Michael.

    To begin with they are madly promiscuous. They have sex everywhere and many have something like 20 partners a night in bathhouses. Their promiscuity is insane.

    Secondly, they instinctively like high-risk behavior. George Michael committed lewd acts in public places again and again.

    Third, they always seem to be into drugs. And again, George Michael died from smoking crack when he was 55.

  45. Cowboy says:

    The minds of women and gays are far easier to fragment through trauma based mind control. This was documented in the MKultra program. This technique has been used for centuries. It is also part of the creation of a third eye in sodomized boys who later become sodomites and pederasts. They too are easily mind controlled.

    So of these female and queer politicians, what is the proportion that aren’t undergoing some kind of mind control? I would bet far less than 50% of the female politicians aren’t mind controlled, and I would bet a far smaller proportion of queers aren’t.

    • Replies: @jeff stryker
  46. It could just be a narrow slice of the silent minority, the small part of the electorate willing to break with the politically correct mantra of the times, admitting that female-dominated workplaces are often fraught with catty competitiveness, womb-privileged absenteeism and momma drama.

    It’s not like men aren’t seeing the benefit of getting in on the easy, low-energy, career-advancing aspects of emotional manipulation via family pageantry and the slacker’s paradise of retaining employment despite protracted periods of absenteeism (for kids). But women branded it, and they are still the Womb Privilege Industry leaders.

    It’s not surprising that those rejecting the trendy, secular pieties of the fake-feminist era are not mostly those who jumped through the social-acceptance hoops to get 1 or 2 degrees. The rebel group that shirked the title train is often the least willing to bow to conventional wisdom, even when it’s sold as advanced thought.

    Many working-clsss women have worked in too many female-led, female-dominated groups, where women loaded the work day down with unnecessary emotionalism. They never hopped on the feminist career-mom PR train, clearing their path for straight-forward speech about job performance, even in cases where women unquestionably deserve above-firing / above-critique stature due to being working women and working moms.

    Women who snag high-and-mighty positions, like Congressional Critters, pat themselves on the back all time, even though America has never had a less industrious and more corrupt group of legislators, mostly corporate lackies committed to increasing their DNA dynasties’ fortunes at the expense of the bottom 80% of citizens.

    We’ve also never had more women serving in government.

    That is why we can’t get anything done to reduce mass-scale, welfare-abetted immigration after 40 years of falling wages. We can’t get anything done, even though 95 million working-aged citizens have abandoned the labor force, half of Americans just work part time, and nearly half of the entire working-aged US population is out of work when recent UC applicants are added to the mix.

    Our unisex legislators are bought off by the Cheap Labor Lobby. Even though millions of Americans cannot afford rent for a one-room apartment, feminist legislators must finance their Barbie-princess palaces, so they do whatever the Cheap Labor Lobby tells them to do with a curtsy.

    Almost all of them are dual-high-earner power couples with two massive salaries per household. They frequently engage in expensive global travel, piling up deep-pocketed business contacts in high style and working only 212 days per year. It’s all for the babies (insert cutesy family pic). They have families to think of, like the frequently absentee moms in America’s many voted-best-for-moms office jobs.

    Congresswo/men cannot be expected to work hard for \$174k any more than the many single moms, working part time to stay under the earned-income limits for welfare programs that cover everything from their rent to their food, plus up to \$6,431 in refundable child tax credit cash. Nor can the many part-time mom workers, supplementing ample spousal income or a big child support check, taking off from work for a million mom-approved frivolities—mornings, afternoons, days and weeks of it—without firing by the equally absentee mom managers.

    It looks like the costly, unelected, Royal, British leadership is good for the same thing: small bursts of emotional energy at just the right, strategic, trendy moments. They make a big show of virtue signaling after one of the few acts of heinous violence, committed by Christians against Muslims.

    There wasn’t much coverage of the royals, making a show of outrage after multiple acts of radical Islamic violence committed against the citizens of their own country. Where was the royal family of England after radical Muslims bombed a kids’ concert in Manchester, England and massacred multiple Brits on London Bridge in a mass stabbing / shooting?

    Did any royal family member expend the energy to make a condemnatory speech after the horrific beheading spree of Jihad John, a chap raised in their country who went on to kill several Americans and others around the globe in the most heinous way possible for doing things like journalism or providing relief aid to Syrian refugees?

    Did the royal family visit the USA to condemn the horrific succession of mass murders of US citizens by radical Islamic terrorists in multiple locations across the country: San Bernardino, CA; Orlando, FL; multiple Midwestern cities; Chattanooga, Boston, etc.? Up to 50 were killed in two of those mass murders by Islamic extremists.

    Did the royal family make a special trip to France after any of the recent, horrific mass murders committed by radical Muslims? Did Prince William make a speech in Paris after the mass shooting at a concert that killed well over 100 or in Nice after the truck-ramming that killed almost as many? Did he and Kate go to France after radical Islamic terrorists gunned down an office full of famous, French artists over a cartoon?

    Did the royal family travel to Belgium, Germany, Sweden or even Canada—the British Royalty’s old stomping ground—after mass murders committed by Muslim terrorists? Did they visit Denmark after two, young, Danish girls, hiking in Morocco, were beheaded and stabbed to death by ISIS?

    The royal couples are paid bigly for their services, much biglier sums than even the massive amounts accruing to the top-earning, above-firing working parents in the Assortative Mating Wealth Concentration Capital of the World, the USA (United States of Absenteeism).

    Britain has more historical ties to the US and Canada than to the Muslim world. Okay, the Queen is very elderly and retired, and William was still an unmarried kid then. But do you even remember a big, showy, emotional speech by Prince Charles or Camilla after Muslim terrorists murdered 3,000 office workers in NYC on 9/11?

    Of the two most recent mass murders in places of worship, far more people were killed by Muslim extremists in the Catholic church in Sri Lanka, with a death count of well over 300. Unless the royal couples are like the absenteeism-friendly American dual earners in their family-friendly jobs—with multiple pregnancy leaves, official PTO vacations, afternoons and mornings off and many other vacation-week getaways, with grovelling grandparents watching the kids—they could have found some extra time to squeeze in a gut-wrenching, emotional speech at the site where over 300 were horrifically murdered in Sri Lanka by Muslim extremists, not just at the mosque in Australia where 50 were heinously killed by an extremist Christian.

    But in keeping with the modern era of dual-high-earner DNA dynasties, schedules for working parents are set not so much by what serves the interests of the nation and the quality of work, but in accordance with what best serves the family’s interests, both financially and in terms of security. Royal families, no less than their non-royal counterparts in the top 20%, might feel that their families are more secure all around—especially financially—when catering to the lucrative gravy train of multi culturalism, regardlsss of what it does to Western culture and even most Western lives.

    Democratic governance and the efficiency of capitalism are wonderous advancements.

    The same mentality prevails in America’s “Republic.” Even without lineage royal figureheads, we have above-firing, dual-high-earner parents galore at the top echelons of elected and non-elected government, in the lower levels of government and throughout the corporate world from top to bottom. And most of them virtue signal more than working hard. And you can’t expect them to be fair at the expense of their womb-productivity-based family privilege.

    The ethos is dug in.

    You don’t do what’s good for your country. You do what’s good for your family (fortune). It’s all about feminist working moms and all about cuddly mommies, babies and womb-privilege, too. It’s not about the greed, cronyism and corruption of adults. And it’s all about loving the babies and mommies around the globe, not about money and how it is gotten around the globe. If you reject this rigged crony parade, you are a racist baby hater.

    • Replies: @jeff stryker
  47. @jeff stryker

    A lot of elite jews are gay and being gay leads in many cases to pedophilia and if you research this you will find this to be the case, one site that deals with this subject is

    The LGBTQ agenda is being pushed by the zionists as by its very nature it tends to destroy the family and the values that historically made America and this agenda runs counter to this, read The Protocols of Zion.

    Another good site is

  48. Anon[424] • Disclaimer says:

    Thatcher -Reagan- Pope John Paul II , the troika of Apocalypse , since then society , religious and civilian , is going down and down .

  49. Women are crazy; men are dumb.

    There you are.

  50. Republic says:

    Didn’t Thatcher famously tell Bush Sr, “no time to go wobbly,” during the buildup to the Gulf War?

  51. Che Guava says:
    @You can't handle the truth

    Working on a national holiday again, I read the article and was thinking of the cheap but effective ‘Buttplug’, but you were in B4.


    I was reading an article where he was explaining how to pronounce his name, he was saying ‘butt-edge-edge’.

    He will never be prexident or vice-prex. Possibly a senator or congress-critter if he is movimg to California.

    I am trying to think of homosexual male politicians, the only ones that come to mind are certain Roman figures (Julius, several later, the older Tiberius, Yukio Mshima (not a politician, but he provided a fulcrum to swing Japan back to nationalism), the various parliamentarians and congress-people who enjoy same-sex toilet sex in secret, and are occasionally caught out (very strange that those shamed for it in U.S. and U.K. are almost always politically conservative). Of course, the homosexual Omerta forbids outing or career destruction on the other side.

    Julie Burchill’s novel, Ambition (not necessarily recommended. I foumd it a laugh), includes a true tale of a rent-boy who was the rent-boy of a Labour Party leader (not the party leader, but close).

    The rent-boy was later to becoming a quite famous actor, the name was Rupert something. Some of his roles were entertaining.

    I suppose that Ernst Roehm may have been a homosexual, and that the SA leadership was full of them, well, maybe, I think that was just a convenient excuse to wipe out the leadership, but can’t work it out. Maybe SA members really were sodomising each other, but don’t see any reason to believe it.

    As for Ardern, I am hoping that others are to take up referring to her in the same way as me, as ‘Skeletor Ardern’, it is surely a suitable nickname.

    • Replies: @Republic
    , @Alfred
  52. @Endgame Napoleon

    Better the US have historical ties with UK than Mexico, in my opinion. When UK is irrelevant and the US is entirely tied to Mestizos in Latin America, then North America has gone into the toilet.

    What happens when UK or Israel do not control our country and it is tied to some Idi Amin in Africa?

  53. Greg S. says:

    I think homosexuals can do fine in politics. Not all of them of course, but I wouldn’t say all straight men are for politics either.

    Women on the other hand are almost always a disaster. Women are too emotionally driven, too reactive, and not strategic minded enough. Women also have innate needs to belong to the “tribe” and conform to the mainstream. This all adds up to women being easily influenced and manipulated, which is the very last thing you want in a politician.

    We evolved to have the men as the “outward” looking force in society, scanning the horizon for the next threat, and women were the “inward” looking force, keeping an eye on things at home and ensuring nothing was rotting from within. What we have seen in modern times is that women have largely abandoned their traditional role and have attempted to join the men in their role. So women have come into the corporate boardrooms while families and social cohesion of society are rapidly crumbling. Some of the opposite has also happened, with the feminizing of men, but not to nearly as great of an extent.

    • Replies: @Feryl
  54. @Cowboy



    In America now, if you are poor you are worse off than any whites anywhere.

    It doesn’t matter how you got rich. Freeway Rick may have killed thousands with crack cocaine and ruined millions of families selling drugs, but he is far more respected than an ex-factory worker his age who has no money.

    Freeway Rick will continue to frequent country clubs and dine on lobster while honest white workers enter retirement poor and ignored.

    • Agree: TKK
  55. Cowboy says:

    Woman undergoing Satanic Trauma Based Mind Control:

  56. anon[316] • Disclaimer says:

    i expect the mayor of Podunk to announce a run any day now

    he/she is certainly qualified

  57. crimson2 says:

    Men commit most violent crime–it’s not even close. So women are probably better suited for politics.

    • Replies: @Feryl
    , @Cowboy
    , @Thomm
    , @Anon
  58. Thomm says:
    @Wizard of Oz

    The fact that Thatcher was PM for 20 months before Reagan entered office does not change the fact that as soon as he arrived, she gladly let him tell her exactly what to do. Her approval ratings rose after January 1981.

    They met unusually often compared to how often their predecessors or successors met.

    Mind you, I am the one saying that Thatcher was the only competent female head of state in modern times. I am simply explaining what made her appear unusually competent for a woman. To her credit, she at least had the good sense to let Reagan tell her what to do. Hillary Clinton was so stupid that she didn’t even take political advice from her husband on many matters in 2016.

    Knowing who to let make important decisions on your behalf is itself an important attribute.

    • Replies: @Dave Bowman
    , @Wizard of Oz
  59. Feryl says:

    It’s beyond me why so many “conservatives” in the English speaking world celebrate neo-liberalism; why did we allow the economic troubles of the 1970’s to become an excuse to de-industrialize and financialize the Anglosphere?

    But, at the end of the day, with the utter failure of “conservatives” to even stop the West from being invaded by barbarians since the late 1980’s, history will render a verdict on Reaganite/Clintonite/Blairite neo-liberalism: a miserable failure that failed to adequately address most of our problems, and created problems which were largely non-existant in the era that preceded neo-liberalism.

    • Replies: @jeff stryker
  60. Cowboy says:

    This meme really illustrates why women make such great politicians…. for their mind control masters.

  61. Feryl says:

    Not sure if you’re kidding or not, but most street crime is perpetrated by low IQ buffoons. Women in particular are well aware of the fact that men tend to be big winners or big losers. The big losers generally don’t make any headway in any sort of high end career (politics included), being that many of them aren’t even intelligent enough to realistically attempt to get anywhere.

  62. Republic says:
    @Che Guava

    He will never be prexident or vice-prex. Possibly a senator or congress-critter if he is movimg to California.

    I have read that he is proposing abolishing the electoral college and packing the US Supreme court. They would like to appoint someone with a non judicial background under that scheme to the high court.

    • Replies: @Che Guava
  63. @Feryl


    Because the politicians wanted to make money off the stock market and wanted support from the corporations.

    Also, while Reagan came from humble roots as the son of an Irish drunk Thatcher was upper middle class and never pretended otherwise.

  64. Cowboy says:

    Men commit most violent crime

    Really? who had more people arkancided, Bill or Hillary?

  65. Thomm says:

    Men commit most violent crime–it’s not even close. So women are probably better suited for politics.

    That is probably the stupidest thing I have ever heard.

    Men have invented almost 100% of everything. As Camile Paglia famously said, if women ran things we would still be living in grass huts (which is generous, as I would like to see a group of women build grass huts).

    Some of the better leaders among men have actually been ex-Generals, so men who have more direct experience with violence than most.

  66. Feryl says:
    @Greg S.

    ” What we have seen in modern times is that women have largely abandoned their traditional role and have attempted to join the men in their role. So women have come into the corporate boardrooms while families and social cohesion of society are rapidly crumbling. ”

    It’s striking how modern Western culture downplays the significance of what women are good at (domestic duty) and encourages them to partake in the “outside” world for which they are often ill-suited. A good example of this is the notion, first pushed in the hippie days, that it was “sexist” to chaperone/guard young women in the outside world. They could take care of themselves, right? Uhh, no*. Countless women got mugged/raped/kidnapped in the 1970’s because they didn’t understand that they were making themselves “easy” targets. Young women traveling alone are naive and physically incapable of defending themselves, relative to how young men can take care of themselves.

    As usual though, these “modern” problems are most pronounced with Boomers. Boomers still have major problems with divorce, with financial arrangements, with workplace jealousy/insecurity, and the like. Gen X-ers, and subsequent generations, have had to do what they can to wrest stablility and sanity from a world gone mad from the delusions and narcissism of the Me Generation (who believe, to a man/woman, that everyone should “work hard” in order to get every single thing they want out of life, no matter how it may damage the people around you).

    *The biggest feminists were born in the 1940’s, and reached high school in the gentle 1950’s and early 60’s. Feminist delusion is lowest among those born in the 60’s and 70’s, who hit adolescence during the major crime wave of the mid-70’s to mid-90’s.

    • Replies: @freedom-cat
  67. Lucy says:

    My unstable female views have always been that men are the natural leaders. In case of a real emergency, I would like a brave man to help us out or figure out a solution. Male lawyers for me are more impressive in court because of their more powerful lung capacity and voices, a male surgeon can stay steady and sure for hours. To be honest, the PM of NZ is a little ridiculous, even women can control themselves if they have to. BTW I’m a baby boomer, a grandmother and I still work. We women have been lucky to live in this civilization and time, but we must recognize there are more differences between men and women than muscle mass, bone density and fast reflexes. Look at contemporary Germany and Sweden with mostly women in charge…I recently told a feminist friend who has been divorced three times and managed to bring up her son alone, that as successful as she thinks she is, she still depends on men such as policemen, and firemen to protect the safe society she lives in. Other “liberated” women depend on social welfare safeguarded by the same safe society. My friend was livid and speechless.

  68. Cowboy says:

    We also need to consider the long chain of bankrupted companies who went under while under gyno leadership. My favorite was Hewlett Packard which went into the tank under Carly Fiorina, who had jumped ship after destroying Lucent which came out of Bell Labs. Fiorina had originally started as a secretary but worked her front hole for a ride to the top. Many other women do this, or they attract dykes like Elizabeth Holmes who started the fraud called Theranos.

    Mary Barra was appointed by Obama to take over GM after the bailouts, and she has spent billions on stock buybacks boosting her bonuses and the value of her stock options, while the company continues to slide into oblivion. The latest straw was ending all compact car production in the US.

    This gyno superstar is also a case in point. She walked off with a \$260million golden parachute.

    The “mother of three” banned employees from working from home, but now wants to promote gyno-womens clubs. What a waste of a high tech company.

    Lets face it, women have millenia of practice with lies.

    • Agree: Desert Fox
    • Replies: @TKK
  69. Cowboy says:

    Nice comment Lucy, I think my wife, a grandmother too, would agree.

    One very important distinction here is barren women vs. mothers, especially those who are past lactation and even menstruation. Just as with good men, good women improve and ripen with age.

    If we think of the Rothschild’s European globalist puppets, Merkel, May and Macron, we can clearly see how they all come from the same childless cookie cutter. They are all fake and shallow.

  70. Anonymous[350] • Disclaimer says:

    Well said. You’re both wise and smart.

  71. @jeff stryker

    Finally, since Jews have such a good gig in America, why kill the host?
    because it’s what they do.

    • Replies: @Mr McKenna
  72. TKK says:
    @Chris Bridges


    Their Grinder culture of frantic anonymous sex is repellent. The myth of the “husbands” is just that – to trick Americans into thinking its monogamy just with the same sex. Harmless old dolts, puttering around their curated cotttages- faithful- doting on their pets. Total Hollywood propaganda.

    WRONG. Having represented a few, they are meth addicted, shallow, vain drama queens who gossip like women. Criminal minded and predatory about money and young attractive boys. And the ones I have dealt with like to beat up their sexual partners. They beat the crap out of each other weekly. Hence the battery charges.

    If Buttplug wins- its over. At least Michael pretended to be a woman. Not sure if that’s a joke or not. She looks like a linebacker from the Bears in drag.

  73. TKK says:

    Minkoff is a big time Scientologist.

  74. Anon[421] • Disclaimer says:

    President is Commander-in-Chief. Women don’t make impressive military commanders.
    With the exception of Joan of Arc and Margaret Thatcher. Just keep it simple in the USA,
    Presidents should be white Christian masculine males, also been that way. Obama was a
    weird looking and acting Commander, a total flop.

  75. Cowboy says:

    White gyno getting crushed by black gyno. Live by the sword, die by the sword.

    Women need to understand that they have been played for fools by gods chosen people. Just like the Russian farmers in 1917 who turned on the czar, in the end they will be the target.

  76. Art says:

    Society needs balance.

    In order to function, society needs the different male traits and female traits of systematization and empathy.

    A women who doesn’t have a loving relationship with her father should never be a political leader. She will have no admiration for the male point of view. Her leadership will be missing half of what constitutes the human make up. Her views will be unbalanced.

    Most men love their mother – their mother transfers her empathy to them. Love of mother brings balance to men.

    • Replies: @Cowboy
  77. @You can't handle the truth

    And then of course he’d have to go bomb some country just to prove his manhood, getting us into more unnecessary wars. No gays for politics, ever.

    That’s an argument against gays??

  78. @Franz

    pretty much had a free pass from the Roosevelt Administration to give nuclear secrets to Stalin.

    Awesome opportunity for a cite.

    • Replies: @Franz
  79. joannf says:

    Ardern is, background/family-wise, a very integrated and connected Globalist puppet. This doesn’t prove she’s not emotionally involved, but it’s certainly the motivation for what happened. I think Brenton Tarrant would agree with me.

    • Replies: @peterAUS
  80. @Teacup

    In fact, I’d be delighted if only U.S. born citizen male property owners over the age of 25 were allowed to vote. How’s that for being a Dissident?

    It’s a start. We might need to define ‘property’ upward, and I’d probably also specify ‘Son of US-born citizens’….

    • Replies: @Chris Mallory
    , @Rosie
  81. @Reg Cæsar

    I can’t remember the last time we had a president remotely as competent as Margaret Thatcher. Maybe Eisenhower? Before my time, anyway.

    • Replies: @Alden
  82. Margaret Thatcher – Yes
    Hillary Clinton – No, no, no, no….

    Can’t generalize the gender.

  83. @joeshittheragman

    it’s what they do.

    Alas, ’tis true. They cannot help themselves.

  84. Cowboy says:

    Most men love their mother – their mother transfers her empathy to them. Love of mother brings balance to men.

    But what if they have no father? History is replete with fatherless and damaged men who are easily manipulated ending up in power. Churchill, Obama and Hitler all come to mind.

    The reality here is that to build a strong culture and society you need a father to be involved in the upbringing of the whole family. African males are demonstrably lacking in concern for raising their offspring, this is why the entire continent of Africa never discovered the wheel.

    Black families have already been obliterated since the beginning of the culture wars. White families are the current target, and the point here is that girls, boys and wives need a stable, solid family steered by a reliable and honest man.

    Instead of defending this keystone of the civilization upon which they depend, women have jumped onto the satanic bandwagon and are revelling in its destruction. This is one of the main negative consequences of female hypergamy.

    • Replies: @Art
  85. peterAUS says:

    Ardern is, background/family-wise, a very integrated and connected Globalist puppet.

    If/when she delivers what she is expected to she’ll be rewarded, as Clark.

    They know what they are doing.

  86. aandrews says:

    Want to build a far-right movement? Spain’s Vox party shows how.
    Anne Applebaum
    Washington Post
    May 2, 2019

    Once on the fringes, Vox blazed across the Internet, dividing its own country while connecting with the far right in many others. Now it’s in parliament.

  87. lloyd says: • Website

    I recall a university cafetaria event in New Zealand in late 1980s. A male student was ranting on about the oppression of the Maoris in the 1860s N Z wars. I quietly brought up the Maori “rebels were spreading terror by attacking white family homesteads and actually eating them. I could have said that more tactfully but it was true and the ranter knew nothing about it. Next day, I was made a pariah at the cafeteria and no one would sit beside me. I had crossed the line. The student ranter was libelling the ancestral families and heritage of these students. But in female dominated Colleges that was ok. Distant history they had no personal knowledge of did not bother them. N Z is a bit more stupid feminist than other Western societies and therefore also a portent of the future. Jacinda Arden now wears a hijab for not just immediate days after Christchurch shootings but seems to be making it a habit.

  88. Franz says:
    @Mr McKenna

    Henry Stevens had a site, I am unaware if anywhere else has the information apart from his books (he wrote more than a few).

    Google only gives the Verona papers band-aid but don’t cover the fact that Roosevelt and his regime gave Stalin anything he wanted, not just during the war years but after. Though Stevens was able to cite declassified KGB archives, an early source for how intense and incredibly huge US “donations” to the USSR is an old classic, East Minus West = Zero by Werner Keller.

    The USSR could not have played “catch up” on nukes, not while digging out of the mess Hitler made of them. Between Stevens and Keller, the game is pretty transparent.

    Actually some excerpts might be worth a blog post, and I got a vacation week coming…

    • Replies: @freedom-cat
  89. Did Jacinda NPC Ardhimi wear a crucifix after the Ceylon Attax?

  90. Rosie says:

    It’s a good thing men are so much more emotionally stable than women. Otherwise, I guess their suicude rates would be even worse! As it stands, men are only 3.5 times more likely to off themselves than women.

    BTW, does psychopathy affect one’s fitness for political office? The ratio of male-to-female psychopaths, for anyone interested in an even-handed appraisal of men’s and women’s suitability for leadership, is 20:1.

  91. Rosie says:

    This means that there will be a tendency for females to push politics Leftwards and make it more about empathy and other such “feelings.” It also means that, in a serious crisis, they may well even empathise with the enemy.

    With the pervasive treason destroying the West, I can’t believe anyone is still trying to sell this nonsense. Just listen to this appalling cuckery.

  92. @Mr McKenna

    In fact, I’d be delighted if only U.S. born citizen male property owners over the age of 25 were allowed to vote. How’s that for being a Dissident?

    It’s a start. We might need to define ‘property’ upward, and I’d probably also specify ‘Son of US-born citizens’….

    Need to raise the age to 40. Limit the vote to natural born American citizen male property owners who are married, have a child and have a direct male ancestor listed in the 1790 census. I could be persuaded to allow Frenchmen and Spaniards included in the acquisition of Florida and the Louisiana Purchase. But no 1840’s and later immigrants.

    • Replies: @Rosie
    , @lloyd
    , @Alden
  93. @Dan Hayes

    interesting. I’ll have to check out JAW

    • Replies: @Dan Hayes
  94. Rosie says:
    @Chris Mallory

    Need to raise the age to 40. Limit the vote to natural born American citizen male property owners who are married, have a child and have a direct male ancestor listed in the 1790 census. I could be persuaded to allow Frenchmen and Spaniards included in the acquisition of Florida and the Louisiana Purchase. But no 1840’s and later immigrants.

    Given that the dissident right has no money, no power, and no influence, speculating about how you’d like to disenfranchise half the white population makes one seriously question your motives. If I wanted to sabotage what is left of the dissident right, I would do exactly what Lance Welton is doing.

    Speaking of money and power, aren’t there hundreds of White Male billionaires in the world, not a single solitary one of whom supports the dissident right?

    Not. Even. One.

    • Replies: @Dave Bowman
    , @Anon
  95. Rosie says:
    @Mr McKenna

    It’s a start. We might need to define ‘property’ upward, and I’d probably also specify ‘Son of US-born citizens’….

    Stupid White Male voters to the (((GOPe))):

  96. lloyd says: • Website
    @Chris Mallory

    The proportion of the black vote would actually rise.

    • Replies: @Alden
  97. anon[202] • Disclaimer says:

    Look at contemporary Germany and Sweden with mostly women in charge

    Two or more generations of the best German males were wiped out.

    Don’t know about Sweden.

    • Replies: @Alden
  98. @Franz

    I’d be interested in reading your post when you finish it!!

  99. @Feryl

    Maybe. But we have guns. Still able to own and operate a gun for protection.

    But are you telling us that there is a huge Rape problem coming forth from our men? Why is it when it suits you you pull out the Rape-card? I thought the “rape-culture” was being propagated by extremist feminists (Andrea Dworkin comes to mind)!!

    Now we have men pushing this idea?

    People need to just calm down and take a deep breath. We will get through these psychologically and mentally trying times. This is all Cyclical. We are in an “end time” which means that once the fog clears we have the potential to move forward in evolution.

  100. In terms of the veracity of stereotypes based on a sample of one person, we might ask, “Is it a coincidence that this fallacious, emotion-driven diatribe has emanated from a woman, and one of Italian ancestry at that?”

    Speaking of “stereotypes based on sample of one,” the narrative about “Italian emotionality” should more properly been filed under, “my first post-high school experience away from home.” It was childish.
    And how do we know Marcotte is Italian? Only thing I found on-line is that she was born & raised in Texas, went to a Catholic school, is a feminist and foul-mouthed, which she applied to Catholic traditions. Sarah Silverman in drag?

    As for Italian women and their proper place in society: Maria Montessori developed principles for teaching young children (and particularly developmentally-disabled children) that are the gold-standard today. Montessori, a physician, developed her program after studying the work of a French physician, Jean Marc Gaspard Itard, who took in The Wild Boy of Aveyron

    The hand that rocks the cradle — or teaches the child — rules the world.

    • Replies: @Rosie
  101. Art says:

    The reality here is that to build a strong culture and society you need a father to be involved in the upbringing of the whole family.

    Agree 100% – children need to experiabce

  102. Anonymous [AKA "lectic"] says:

    Women, Like New Zealand’s Ardern” ????
    “Women” ?? You can’t be serious?
    Obviously you haven’t done your homework.

  103. Rosie says:
    @Grace Poole

    Speaking of “stereotypes based on sample of one,” the narrative about “Italian emotionality” should more properly been filed under, “my first post-high school experience away from home.” It was childish.

    Treacherous male politicians are treacherous because they’re controlled by nefarious puppetmasters. Treacherous female politicians are treacherous because they’re women.

    Or something.

  104. @Anonymous

    A lot of German men, the blonds, are darn good looking, though. And in a time of duress i imagine French women finding them very appealing. I may have to watch Kon Tiki again, as the Blond Nordic men in film were ALL quite beautiful specimens.

    Throughout history, though, white women have been more race conscious than their male counterparts, who have sewn their “wild oats” with women of color without hesitation. It’s only recently that women have caught up with men in matching up with men of color.

    White females have been seriously degraded and mostly by their own people & themselves. The Porn industry proves that. If our people are going to make it through these turbulent times, then we all have to stop blaming one another and start lauding each other instead of putting each other down.

    I really don’t see that happening here in the US, though. Telling women they are basically effed up airheads who should not be allowed near a voting booth or allowed to follow any dream besides Household duties (kind of sounds like Taliban country to me), really condemns women and many will likely cling to their “beliefs” because the alternative is basically Annihilation as a human.

    Many parts of Europe are doomed as well. The pockets that will remain are the ones who close their doors and indict the “elite” who were responsible for the entire open-door policies.

  105. T1970 says:
    @Nicolás Palacios Navarro

    Interesting observation about the female orchestra conductors. I have the same view. I find myself quite uncomfortably “on edge” when a woman stands in front of the musicians, directing them.

    I experience it purely energetically and can’t point to a specific faulty action. I just know I feel nervous, and yearn for the commanding and solid presence one feels with a talented male conductor.

  106. Alden says:
    @Nicolás Palacios Navarro

    Nancy Pelosi is as cold and emotionless as ice and has been since she married Paul and moved to San Francisco. You don’t know any of the women you mentioned do you? So don’t assume anything from their public persona

    Never heard of any of the authors you mentioned.

  107. Alden says:

    Sweden stayed out of both WW1&2 and their men are far more femininized wimps than the Germans.

    French men bore huge losses in both wars and are far more macho than German men. Same with Italians.

  108. Alden says:

    Note that the 3 Supreme Court decisions made by the representatives of satan on the Supreme Court, Brown vs Topeka Griggs ca Duke Power and Kaiser vs Weber were all done by White men.

    The civil rights act of 1964 and the immigration act of 1965 were passed by 98 men out of 100 senators and 423 out of 435 Congress critters. The 1968 affirmative action law was passed by a 99 out of 100 senators and 423 out of 435 Congress critters. It was a White man, Eisenhower who sent troops and even tanks to destroy the public schools. It was White men, Lyndon Johnson and Hubert Humphrey who wrote and lobbied congress to pass the aforementioned anti White laws.

    Stop blaming 20 year old girls with tattoos and put the blame exactly where it belongs the White men of the greatest generation.

    12 years 1956 to 1968 was all it took. Anything after 1968 was just mopping up.

  109. Alden says:

    Yes it would. I think blacks were 20% in colonial times. I don’t know very many Mayflower descendants. But judging by the ones I do know, I’m the only pro White one in my state. They are a collection of ultra liberals.

  110. Alden says:
    @Chris Mallory

    How about gr gr gr grandchildren of John and Priscilla Alden who moved south and married French people for several generations?

    Be careful of old stock Americans. Don’t assume they’re are conservative whatever that is or pro White.

    What are conservatives? Anti abortion which only ensures more black and brown dreck with affirmative action privileges, pro capitalism anti worker endless blather about the constitution by those who never took a constitutional law course in other words losers.


    • Replies: @Cowboy
  111. Alfred says:
    @Che Guava

    I am trying to think of homosexual male politicians

    How about the UK’s prime minister Ted Heath. An accomplished musician. Also suspected of raping males he gave lifts to in his car.

    Edward Heath: whiff of scandal still surrounds enigmatic leader
    This article is more than 1 year old

    The lifelong bachelor, Britain’s prime minister from 1970 to 1974, was dogged by scurrilous gossip for much of his career

    • Replies: @Che Guava
    , @Dave Bowman
  112. Wally says:

    Music is essentially math with sound and understanding how they work together, understanding the emotion that the composer was conveying.

    Women conductors tend to be stiff, wooden.

    They try so hard to get the math / execution right that they cannot put it on auto-pilot, so to speak, and let the music breath & open up. IOW, they think too much when they conduct and the results are obvious to an experienced listener. It all comes across as forced.

    Then there was the worse conductor ever, a man of a sort; Leonard The Gusher Bernstein.
    His compositions are / were equally atrocious.
    But then he had a good PR committee on his side.

  113. Alden says:
    @Mr McKenna

    Eisenhower integrated the schools.

  114. @Wally

    Then there was the worse conductor ever, a man of a sort; Leonard The Gusher Bernstein.
    His compositions are / were equally atrocious.
    But then he had a good PR committee on his side.

    He was a difficult man to respect. Some of his recordings are quite fine, but much of his discography is vastly overrated. (His Mahler, for example.) Nor was he beneath tossing his more talented peers under the bus if it meant a chance for personal advancement (e.g. Alan Hovhaness, Dimitri Mitropoulos, Artur Rodziński, et al).

  115. @Alden

    Nancy Pelosi is as cold and emotionless as ice and has been since she married Paul and moved to San Francisco. You don’t know any of the women you mentioned do you? So don’t assume anything from their public persona

    My judgments are not based on personal knowledge, of course. Rather, it is based on their irrational public policy which has little, if anything to do with sober reasoning on behalf of the countries they purport to serve. Pelosi is arguably, if perhaps improbably, among the lesser evils among my aforementioned female politicians.

    Never heard of any of the authors you mentioned.

    Few would have in this age where your average adult reads only comic books (if they read at all). Not saying that is the case with you specifically, by the way. Lispector’s stature has grown enormously in the English-speaking world in the past decade. Murasaki Shikibu is a household name in Japan since she is the author of that nation’s most famous literary classic, Genji monogatari (The Tale of Genji), written over a stretch of several years in the 11th century. It is also well-known worldwide (it has been translated five times into English since the beginning of the 20th century). The other listed ladies are all comparatively obscure.

  116. @T1970

    Female conductors, nearly every one to a woman that I have heard live or on records, exhibit a common problem: driving climaxes hard to the point of distortion. All (save for at least one, Nadia Boulanger) suffer from this stylistic ailment. Not sure why this is so, but I am guessing that it may be the result of over-compensation. As if to say, “I can be just as loud as the boys!” Today’s male conductors, mediocre as almost all of them are, suffer from many faults, too. But not that one, oddly enough.

  117. Cowboy says:

    Stop blaming 20 year old girls with tattoos and put the blame exactly where it belongs the White men of the greatest generation.

    I think the point here is that it matters little whether the psychopath is male or female, if the target of blackmail is male or female, or if the greedy snake is male or female.

    What really does matter is how does a society or civilization create a continuing, self replenishing pool of talented and honorable people? It clearly starts with the family. Strong, undamaged families require a the presence of a full time mother, or at least close to it. An honest, loyal, bread winning father is also key, but the family can be strong even if he is absent most of the day but home in the nights.

    Starting with womens suffrage, women have been enticed out of the house and into competing with men for jobs that they are not suited or qualified for. The Peter Principle does not apply to women riding the affirmative action band wagon, and they have risen far higher than their talents and ability would merit. But the real issue here is that society and culture require that they be focused primarily on keeping a steady family in a warm, loving household. Only women can achieve this, yet they have abandoned it by the droves to go compete with and act like men. This has been the direct result of an ancient judaic conspiracy.

    It is this change in the thinking patterns of genetically hypergamous women that was used to destroy western civilization. Women are far more vulnerable to trauma based mind control, and the ancient bloodlines have known this and have used it to their advantage for centuries. The old adage goes: “To control the men, control the women. To control the women, control the children”.

    • Replies: @HallParvey
  118. Cowboy says:

    What are conservatives? Anti abortion which only ensures more black and brown dreck with affirmative action privileges

    Everyone loves to equate Far Right with Nazi and Hitler, and Conservatives are the Right Wing in America.

    Yet Hitler’s eugenics always made perfect sense. Why shouldn’t Germany have striven to improve the German race? Why shouldn’t incapable or damaged genetic lines that are a drain on society be “encouraged” to either disappear or be blended in such a way to improve society?

    The answer is because the German bloodline IS superior to the “semite” bloodline, and the jews knew it. If Germany had continued eugenics they would have left judea in the dust and pulled all the white peoples along with them. This was the true meaning of “Meister” race. They would have turned the world into a workshop and through example (SS were the greatest and most honorable soldiers of the 20th century) and training would have civilized the entire planet.

    Instead, Germany was crushed and we live under Noahide laws while we wait for the reconstruction of Solomon’s temple.

    This article about Somalians in Switzerland caught my eye. Why should the Swiss have to pay for thousands of Somali parasited who breed like flies and are totally disgenic? The Swiss never had colonies, they never gassed and jews and they have been neutral for centuries…

    The data was gathered and released by both the Federal Statistical Office and the State Secretariat for Migration and shows that the 4,000 or so Somalis in Switzerland are by far the most prone to being on government benefits with 83.7 per cent relying on state income, 20 Minutes reports.

    While Somalis are by far and wide the largest recipients of welfare, several other nationalities also have rates of over 50 per cent, such as Eritreans at 54.7 per cent and Angolans at 54 per cent.

    • Replies: @jeff stryker
  119. @Cowboy


    I’m German-American (As is Trump) and I have a question about inferior Jews-

    If Jews are inferior why is their IQ 115 on average? German IQ is high on average as well, but Jews have us beat by 5 IQ points.

    If Jews are morally inferior why are so few of them in prison?

    If the German bloodline is superior, why are Irish-Americans on the East Coast and various non-Jewish white ethnic groups like Italian-Americans or old WASP gentility wealthier in America than German-Americans on average?

    Minnesota is arguably the most German/Nordic place in America. But what is so wonderful about it. Why doesn’t it have the GDP of California or NYC?

    • Replies: @Cowboy
    , @Mulegino1
  120. Cowboy says:
    @jeff stryker

    Earth to Jeffy-boy: Jews Lie. They do it habitually to goyim, and they lie so often and so casually that they even have a yearly feast to celebrate their lies, its called Kol Nidre. One crass example of jewish lies is the old “We have IQ 115”. Yet the average IQ of Israel is 85. Jews lie so often that they cannot even recognize their own lies, just like you.

    Jews own the media, the education system, government and banking. If you want to state any statistics or “facts” about jews, you have to be prepared to show that they are “non-kosher”. Every thing you stated in your tirade are typical jewish lies, like the one you started with:

    “I’m German-American (As is Trump)”


    • Agree: Desert Fox
    • Replies: @jeff stryker
  121. Mulegino1 says:

    Gynocracy is a curse of the end times/Kali Yuga and the result of the lack of true virility in a culture. Since nature abhors a vacuum, politics becomes the battleground of feminized men and sterile women. This will naturally lead to the horrors of rule by sodomites and other freaks of nature.

    The only LGBQT that I would support is:






    Anything else ought to be categorically rejected by those of Christian European provenance. Our cultural heritage is based upon a virile Christianity. Once this disappears from the west, we are done for.

  122. Mulegino1 says:
    @jeff stryker

    The Jews, as a collective, are not so intelligent as they are sharp or clever.

    As the monetization of a culture or society increases, naturally the Jews are going to predominate, because the entire focus of their collective effort is drawing attention to their collective achievements and making money. They are not very good at anything else.

    There is no such thing as “Jewish science.” True, there are scientists who are Jews, but they have all piggybacked off of the science whose provenance is overwhelmingly Christian and European.

    There is no such thing as “Jewish architecture” except a few deformed sub-genres.

    There is no such thing as “Jewish art” in the sense of fine art.

    I guess an argument could be made that there is Jewish music, an altogether subterranean and inferior genre.

    The Jews do not excel in high things, but in low things, so it is natural that they would predominate in things like litigiousness, movies and entertainment. The Talmudic lack of transcendence and metaphysical principles excludes their collective from any kind of high vocation.

  123. @Wizard of Oz

    Is it possible that Google is politically regulated?

    We have to accept that there are some things that are unknowable. If no records are kept, for example.

    Another thing to remember is that secret conspiracy and utter incompetence are often indistinguishable.

  124. @Alden

    Sew the wind, reap the whirlwind.

    “We hold these truths to be self evident. That all men are created equal.”

    Maybe some “self evident truths” should be re-examined.

  125. @Cowboy


    If a group with a collective IQ of 85 seized the media, financial centers and amassed the power that Jews have done since arriving in the US, gee, the rest of us must be pretty dull.

    Irish-American Catholics were disregarded as unintelligent too, but they are another highly-successful group on the East Coast.

    As for my German (And not Jewish) heritage, I cannot understand why people of Scottish or French-Canadian and English descent in the South or interior who identify as cowboys or Southwestern or Southern talk about Germans.

    There are Germans in Texas hill country, but that is about it.

    Like I said, if the Jews “own” the government and have IQ’s of 85 what does that say about the rest of us?

    • Replies: @Cowboy
  126. @Cowboy

    and the ancient bloodlines have known this and have used it to their advantage for centuries. The old adage goes: “To control the men, control the women. To control the women, control the children”.

    Ancient bloodlines???? I wonder who?

  127. Dan Hayes says:


    A follow-up on John Archibald Wheeler. On his death one of his former students stated in “Physics Today” that JAW was denied a Physics Nobel Laureate because of what would later be termed non-PC thoughts and activities.

    • Agree: freedom-cat
  128. Cowboy says:
    @jeff stryker

    Like I said, if the Jews “own” the government and have IQ’s of 85 what does that say about the rest of us?

    It says that Jews habitually lie, cheat, steal, torture, murder and commit genocide. All without a smack of remorse or guilt because their “god” forgives them for it. Just as with Muslims.

    So the answer to your question, it says that Christians are a lot more honest and honorable than jews. As they say, a lie goes around the world before the truth gets its boots on. This has been going on ever since the jews murdered Jesus, and over the centuries they have extended their usurious corruption into all walks of our life.

    • Replies: @jeff stryker
  129. @freedom-cat

    You appear to have mysteriously overlooked one key and very critical fact: Oppenheimer was, of course, Jewish – and as you will discover easily from a mass of learned research, Jews generally – NOT just female Jews – are massively over-represented in the hierarchies for neuroticism, self-absorption, emotionalism and mental imbalance.

    In other words, think Woody Allen but with a gargantu-brain whose genius is already veering dangerously towards self-doubt and madness. No wonder the atom bomb took him over the edge.

    Such is not true of European Whites, nor ever was, on anywhere near the same scales of analysis or evidence.

    • Replies: @freedom-cat
  130. Che Guava says:

    Well, that will get him some mileage in the Demoncrat’s primaries, but both seem to be general goals now. Demons can’t allow the constitutional protection of representation of the states (the name of the place, is, after all, the United States, and your constitution was written to reflecting the rights of them) to continue.

    You are between a rock and a hard place.

    Trump is a slave of Israel, MIGA, not MAGA, but a better candidate against him is unlikely. It would be interesting if he did some of what he said he would do for U.S.A. people before the next election, I would not be holding my breath for it.

    As many others, both U.S. citizens and outside observers find much of what Yang is saying of interest, but he has a snowball’s chance in hell of becoming the candidate.

    Not that our politics is any good. Abe is P.M. the second time around. He built his political career as a writer (not the drawer) of ultranationalist comics in the 1980s. Sure, part of the content was true. Much was not.

    Now the main opposition party (calling itself the Democratic Party, which arose from the old Democratic Socialists, with some defectors from the ruling party, to become the Democratic Party of Japan) has broken into three parties my translations are accurate, all are prefixes to ‘Democratic Party’, so we now are having the Constitutional DP, the Monarchical Constitutionalist DP, and the Volkishe DP.

    Outside that, we have the Communist Party of Japan, who always win some seats in the Diet, but the electoral system was changed to reduce their representation many years ago (and most of their candidates are lawyers, it does not mean the same thing as it would in a western country, it is still possible here to became a lawyer by self-study and taking an exam, and the profits are not obscene).

    However, it would be nice if they were not all lawyers.

    Penultimately, we have the 公明党、’Public Light Party ‘, which is the creature of the biggest post WWII Buddhist cult, Soka Gakkai. The cult has about ten million followers here (more overseas). It is a little like a ‘prosperity gospel’ version of Buddhism.

    They live in concentrated areas, when they move into a new one, many protest banners, but legally, nothing can be done.

    The followers vote en bloc, so they get quite a few reps., and, by coalition, have kept the illiberal and non-democratic Liberal Dem. Party in power for most of the last twenty years.

    Finally, the Socialist Party of Japan still exists, but is pretty much meaningless now. The change to the electoral system was mainly directed at CPJ, but it had even worse effects on SPJ.

    Excuse the long explanation, somebody may finding it of interest.

    I look at U.S.A. politics from outside, it is profoundly depressing. Worse than here.

  131. @Jack Highlands

    gay men, men who will not struggle to possess women, have not earned a place in political decision-making;


  132. @Cowboy


    Few Jews are in jail for theft or larceny. They go to jail for embezzlement or other white collar crimes, not mugging people on the street.

    Schools don’t go downhill because of Jews. If you send your kid to a largely Jewish school, you know it is probably safe. If I told you your kid could go to a public school full of beans, trailer trash and blacks or a Jewish prep school, you’ll choose to send your kid to a Jewish school.

    Murder? When was the last time some white people drove into a Jewish neighborhood in Brooklyn or some other heavily-Jewish city and Jews killed them?

    Let us be serious about racial violence in the US. Jews are not behind this.

    I’m not defending Jews because I love Jews or am Jews, but simply evaluating of physical threats on the street.

    These are mostly blacks, Hispanics and lower number of white trash.

    • Replies: @Cowboy
  133. Republic says:
    @Chris Bridges

    Until the early 70s, the DSM, The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual, the handbook for psychiatrists, listed Homosexuality as a mental disorder, a few years later this was changed by a group of Jewish psychiatrists.

    • Replies: @Feryl
  134. @Thomm

    In all fairness to Hillary – and God knows I have absolutely no reason whatever to be fair to her – she ignored Billary for one very simple reason: As a “husband”, he well and truly shot his bolt emotionally and supportively with her when he… err… shot his bolt with Monica L.

    In other words, who knows – perhaps Hillary would have been an altogether better, smarter, more pliant, intelligent, perceptive, rational and emotionally-stable person if Billary hadn’t been a smug, arrogant, spineless, lounge-lizard liar and slut.

  135. Che Guava says:

    Thank you,

    I have read about it before. Am not convinced either way, but you are likely right.

    I forgot that, in my brief time studying in Oz, hard-core old-left (as I also was at the time) friends told me that former Australian P.M. Paul Keating and former N.S.W. Premier Robert ‘Bob’ Carr were both secret homosexuals.

    Both points have much back-up.

    There must be many others in many other places.

    In Japan, even Yukio Mishima’s homosexuality is still treated as a kind of state secret, even after his longest-term male lover became famous as a performer, and spoke and wrote openly about it.

    • Replies: @jeff stryker
  136. @Lucy

    Gotta love a woman with a working brain.

  137. @Che Guava


    Many of these politicians went to expensive boarding schools where homosexuality was common, even rape.

    It is unsurprising that politicians who came out of boarding schools were gay-they spent their teen years in all-male institutions.

    And unsurprisingly, many retain this in adulthood.

  138. Cowboy says:
    @jeff stryker

    “I’m not defending Jews because I love Jews or am Jews, but simply evaluating of physical threats on the street.”

    You are a liar, and a jew, or at least a talmudist, so what you write makes no difference. I just explained that jews lie, and you ignored me and repeated the same jew lies you repeat on thread after thread after thread.

    When was the last time some white people drove into a Jewish neighborhood in Brooklyn or some other heavily-Jewish city and Jews killed them?

    Jeff, have you ever heard of Gaza? Have you bothered to observe what jews are doing to Palestinian children there, often from 1000 yards with US Barret rifles? Are you aware of what jews are doing to Christians and Christian churches across occupied Palestine? Sweet Jesus, please spare us from lying jews and talmudists like “Jeff Stryker”.

    If you send your kid to a largely Jewish school, you know it is probably safe

    90% of DHS funds are going to jewish organizations because by their nature jews have to steal all the resources. This is why they never feel safe no matter where they are on the planet, and why they have heavily guarded schools. These schools certainly would not be “safer” for a Christian child who likely would end up with his blood extracted and his corpse thrown down a well in some kabbalistic ritual. Possibly even Jeff Stryker would say a few words from the talmud during the blood extraction phase.

    • Replies: @jeff stryker
  139. @Rosie

    aren’t there hundreds of White Male billionaires in the world

    No, in fact there are not, since you ask.

    Statistically, the vast and overwhelming majority of the world’s billionaires are JEWISH – ie. direct Khazar / Ashkenazi descent, non-White, hard-left, Trotskyist/communist, Christian-hating, White-hating racists.

    You’re welcome.

    • LOL: Cowboy
    • Replies: @jeff stryker
  140. @Alden

    For the umpteenth time – the blame is NOT with White men. Eisenhower and Johnson were Christian-hating, White-hating JEWS.

    • Replies: @Cowboy
  141. @Alfred

    The lifelong bachelor, Britain’s prime minister from 1970 to 1974, was dogged by scurrilous gossip for much of his career

    What’s your point ? No one with a brain cell denies he was a smug, self-opinionated, utterly narcissistic, dishonest, disloyal and spineless liar and traitor, who sold his country lock, stock and barrel into the EEC – the economic forerunner of the EU – against the better judgement of millions. That worked out well.

    And, many had no doubt, a pedo to boot.

  142. Cowboy says:
    @Dave Bowman

    Eisenhower and Johnson were Christian-hating, White-hating JEWS.

    Which begs the question, what exactly is a Jew? Of course Zionists, Communists, Orthodox, Kabbalists and “Jeff Stryker” won’t give us a straight answer even if they could agree on one. “Jew” has become just another weaponized yid word used for their usual genocidal purposes. The list grows so long that it gets tiresome:

    White Nationalist
    Freedom of Speech
    and worst of all

    It also is important to remember that if Eisenhower had not assassinated Patton, he never would have been elected anyway. Eisenhower was just another Clintonian phony.

    • Replies: @jeff stryker
  143. @Cowboy


    I grew up around Jews because I am from an urban Northern city and middle-class/upper middle-class. So from day one, I was around Jews because you cannot be from a Northern industrial hub and white-collar without being surrounded by them.

    Most of posters who talk about Jews the most extensively have never been around Jews because they came from lower middle-class, rural or exurban backgrounds.


    You’ve already mentioned Muslims having the same traits as Jews. Which is probably why they kill one another. Your chances as a Christian of being killed by a Jew in America are lower than being killed by another Christian-notably a Catholic Mexican or Baptist black.

    “Blood extracted”

    Absolute nonsense that Jews are extracting the blood of Irish-Catholics or Italians or Slavs in heavily Jewish schools in New Jersey or Chicago or NYC where the students are a mixed bunch of Jews, some blacks, Irish-Americans and Italian like Manhattan.

    Absolutely false. If you genuinely believe that, you must be from the real rural regions and have never traveled to a city large enough to have a Jewish population.

  144. Anon[192] • Disclaimer says:

    half the white population

    I’d question your arithmetic here…

    But at any rate Mr. Mallory also intends(?) to disenfranchise the entirety of the nonwhite population(even if, as another commenter mentioned, his methods for doing so may not be the best-chosen for that end), so I’m not sure it matters all that much.

  145. @Dave Bowman


    That’s an interesting thing about Jews. They thrive under Capitalism, but always seem to have quasi-Marxist sympathies.

    Under socialism, which as Jared Taylor points out is a good system for poor proles but lousy for entrepreneurs, Jews cannot make the money they make .

    You’d think they’d all be GOP Republicans who wanted to do away with welfare and not pay taxes. But even the most loaded Jewish billionaire is a socialist, whereas WASP wealthy are positively synonymous with Republicanism.

  146. @NoseytheDuke

    Thank you for reminding me that, after selling my successful business of training motivational speakers, how-to-be-real-estate-hucksters-without-investing-a-cent and getting-attention-from-your-similarly-half-educated-peers-when-passing-the-port I shall start a fashion with book “Cohorts”. Did you stop a dinner party with the revelation that you had read a book when you got half way through that one of Strauss and Howe’s stream of entertaining guff? At least my old McKinsey mate made sure the ladies, with their acute BS detectors, had retired before he regaled us with the wisdom instantly smoked up from Alvin Toffler’s “Future Shock”.

    Actually you have added something beyond your totally uninteresting, vaguely but vituperatively expressed opinions of Reagan and Thatcher. Anyone following up on your book citation might eventually come to the conclusion after Wikipedia has more or less confessed that most of their entry has come from their publisher but nonetheless “pseudoscience” features and so does “Generations is guaranteed to attract pop history and pop social science buffs. Among professional historians, it faces a tougher sell. ….” that it makes one little point. (Oh, yes, and before I forget, Al Gore liked his old college contemporary’s book). That little point is that you could think of adding generation of impressions from surrounding fashions and events to class, race, sex, stage of economic development and religion to cross disciplinary studies.

  147. Anon[708] • Disclaimer says:

    You do seem to have a torrent of quite well informed words ever ready to go but don’t you think it might be better to save your time and self-respect by not replying to raving redneck loons like Dave Bowman and Cowboy?

    • Replies: @jeff stryker
  148. @Cowboy


    I’m not Jewish, so I can’t answer that.

    Racism? I have heard that in East Coast jails Jews and Nazis are brothers because white is white in prison.

    White nationalism? Aren’t Jews white? Don’t the have nationalist organizations? Isn’t the mafia a form of Italian-American nationalism?

    Marriage? Jews marry. Probably less children are born out-of-wedlock from Jewish people than poor whites. At what point are Jews going to tell Italians or Irish they are closing down churches in NYC so they cannot marry? This will never happen.

    Sorry, but some of these statements don’t reflect reality.

    • Replies: @Cowboy
  149. @Franz

    #15 was meant as a reply to you as follows:
    There are a lot of commenters on UR who rely on obscure sources but my Googling “Robert Oppenheimer Soviet dasher Henry Stevens” has been quite unable to find anything to support your intriguing idea. Do you think there is a serious case to be made or are you just giving us the benefit of a bit of gossip?

    • Replies: @Franz
  150. @Thomm

    Remind us what Reagan told Thatcher to do, what she did in response and, please, as it is strange news to me, where your source this information from. Another commenter has said that Reagan tried to persuade her not to invade/recover the Falklands. Do you dispute that?

    • Replies: @jeff stryker
  151. @Wizard of Oz


    Like many Irish-Americans, Reagan failed to make any stance on the IRA. This was a sore spot in US-UK relations.

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
  152. Cowboy says:
    @jeff stryker

    I’m not Jewish

    Sorry Shlomo, I don’t believe you. Save your spiel for another goy sucker. In any case, I have read enough of your comments to figure out your game. You never answer any question or deal with any point, you just kvetch the same old 85-IQ chosenite drivel, over and over again.

    But you are correct, I do not live anywhere near the East Coast of the US, mostly because I despise idiot Yankees and what they have done to America. I live in Europe and have raised my family here, as far away from the arrogant asshole Yankees and their beloved Jews as I can get.

  153. @Anon


    Privately, I suspect they are envious of the average Jewish income and status in society-or they perceive.

    Middle-class whites less so, like me.

    I don’t buy for a minute they care about Gaza.

  154. Alden: “Stop blaming 20 year old girls with tattoos and put the blame exactly where it belongs the White men of the greatest generation.”

    Yes, those intrepid Nazi-fighters of the greatest (i.e. stupidest) generation were so very pleased with themselves for having destroyed the eruption of white supremacy in Europe; so intoxicated by their own virtue that they decided to inflict similar destruction on themselves! But this was only a continuation of a pattern begun in the previous century, when white men of the North overwhelmed and destroyed the white supremacist culture of the white men of the South, and then, drunk on their own goodness, rewrote their national Constitution to include negroes as citizens fully equal to whites. Surely these wonderfully Christian actions will merit a kiss from rabbi Jesus when the white race finally goes extinct and its shade floats up into the sky!

    White men. Still crazy after all these years! (But well-suited for politics.)

  155. Cowboy says:

    Yankees in one meme:

    • Replies: @jeff stryker
  156. Franz says:
    @Wizard of Oz


    Go here first:

    The rebuttal is what matters. NY Review of Books, like Google, is hardly going to say much because even specialists have a lot of Cold War Fog to cut through.

    It’s worth noting that damage control from this information began in the early 90s when the Soviet Union became what it is now, and Russians (at least some high ranking ones) thought normal relations between nations was now the Gold Standard. They were premature.

    Two topics you won’t find anything online: The Atom Scientists of the 1940s and the “Brainwashing” operations during the Korean War, which was a joint effort with the USA that included the CIA working both sides. There’s good reasons these issues are difficult to get at.

    But have no fear, there’s lots offline, which means after a few skeletons fall out of their closets and people are ready for truth, it will be there. It took decades of treason for 911 to happen so easily, it won’t disappear overnight.

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
  157. @jeff stryker

    Thanks. I think Thomm is an eccentric troll: mot much malice so it’s just a toin coss for him to decide who he is going to try and get a rise out of today.

  158. @Franz

    As far as I can see the interesting exchanges you have now led me to give no reason at all to think Oppenheimer, Fermi, Bohr, or anyone but Fuchs, were Soviet agents.

  159. @freedom-cat

    I didn’t mysterious overlook that fact about Oppenheimer; but the subject matter is about whether women are fit to participate in politics (whether voting or holding office). My point was by looking at Science as an example, we can see that men, too, can be unstable and unfit for their professions. Men were in tears, literally, for the monster they created and this was Not just Jews. The Manhattan Project had both Jewish and Non-Jewish Whites onboard. And it was a Non-Jewish white Administration that ordered the unnecessary bombing of Hiroshima/Nagasaki.

  160. @Dave Bowman

    Oops I first replied to my own comment.

    I didn’t mysterious overlook that fact about Oppenheimer; but the subject matter is about whether women are fit to participate in politics (whether voting or holding office). My point was by looking at Science as an example, we can see that men, too, can be unstable and unfit for their professions. Men were in tears, literally, for the monster they created and this was Not just Jews. The Manhattan Project had both Jewish and Non-Jewish Whites onboard. And it was a Non-Jewish white Administration that ordered the unnecessary bombing of Hiroshima/Nagasaki.

  161. Feryl says:

    It was changed after pro-gay activists picketed a DSM pow-wow that was being held in…..San Francisco. Uh-huh.

  162. @Cowboy


    Another America-obsessed European.

  163. Paw says:
    @You can't handle the truth

    Is this a joke? Thatcher and Victoria ?

  164. anonymous[191] • Disclaimer says:
    @Nicolás Palacios Navarro

    Nature deemed that women are physically and mentally designed to look after children and the family and men are designed to look after the town and the state. When a woman like Ardern gets into a top political office like she is, most of the people that she will deal with are men and many of them are from societies that still do not believe that women are fit to rule a country. What will her reaction be when she is snubbed or treated with contempt by such men? Is she strong enough to not take it personally, or will she put the interests of New Zealand above her own petty feelings? I think most of us know what the probable answer to such a question is through observing typical office politics.

  165. Sunshine says:

    I’m a woman, I have a high school diploma. So I’m not “educated”, yet somehow I always manage to be smarter than the highly educated people I’ve known (in general). When people with advanced degrees cannot balance an account, pay a bill, use the correct form of “your” or “their”, and seem to be utterly oblivious to anything outside their bubble, what am I supposed to think? That they’re somehow better than me, because they paid tens to hundreds of thousands of dollars to get a piece of paper, after they spent four plus years drinking and screwing anything in sight?

    All I’ve ever seen a degree do for a person, is turn them into an even more insufferable, arrogant, programmed, idiot. They have zero actual skills, no ability to think or reason, no intellectual curiosity (I’ve lost count of the people with degrees that have proudly told me they’ve never read a book for pleasure, or at all), so why am I not surprised that they’d support women in politics?

    As a woman, I’ll be honest here. Women are petty, spiteful, vicious creatures, and they are absolutely and totally unsuitable for politics. I’d never vote for a woman for anything. After my experiences working for women, being around women, and just being a woman that is a “nonconformist” and therefore weird, I pretty much wouldn’t spit on a woman if they were on fire. I don’t owe them anything and I want nothing from them and they certainly don’t represent me in any way. The years of vicious yet passive aggressive nastiness from them, for my daring to be a housewife and mother, and to have a husband that actually likes me and spends his time with me, have made me utterly uninterested in any of their “sisterhood” lies. Find another sucker for that crap.

    Sorry for the harshness but the lies are what infuriate me most. “Sisterhood! Freedom of choice! Live the way you want, without the evil patriarchy!” It all means “live the way WE think you should, and if you aren’t a miserable and bitter shrew, we will try and drag you down into our bucket of crabs.

    I loathe this feminized society. I miss a society run by men.

  166. @Sunshine


    It isn’t as easy to obtain a four-year degree as you think. Most college students work as well as attend school, with their off-hours spent in thankless jobs (If you ever attended college and worked minimum wage jobs you’ll stay in school just because you know how the less educated live…I worked in restaurants and labored on construction sites with men my father’s age and thought how sad they were to be doing grunt jobs in their forties and fifties).

    As for screwing or doing drugs, sure, college kids do that but so do many young people. It isn’t zoned to college campuses.

    So far as politicians go, the males seem to get suck into affairs or having mistresses like Clinton more often. Of course female politicians do too, we all know Hillary had affairs with a variety of men while married to Bill (Who didn’t care), but female politicians keep this discreet.

    • Replies: @Sunshine
  167. @Sunshine

    SUNSHINE “College Boy Response”

    …Its pretty pathetic to be working with teenagers or post-adolescents when you are 40 years old because you have no marketable job skills. When I was in college I would find myself doing labor jobs with off-campus locals and thinking “this man is the same age as my father and he is making minimum wage like me”.

    …How does anyone support a family by working in retail as a grown man? Of course minimum wage is pitifully low in the US but how could you mortgage a house, own a car, do anything?

    …If you have no degree or solid trade you cannot leave a city or region if it goes bad like Detroit or Flint. You’re stuck. Nobody will care if your kids get extorted or sexually bullied by blacks in lousy public schools because you cannot move and your neighborhood becomes a dangerous slum and you are stuck behind doors after 6 PM like the peasants in Transylvania in Dracula.

    …These sort of people have a tremendous amount of faith or expectation in government. Which won’t do anything for them. The first thing you learn in college is that the government is a racket for special interest groups to make money and really not concerned with the public interests. At what point has the government done anything about the Rustbelt?

    …You live in the South which is different because all of you share a British heritage (Except for the French-Canadians in Louisiana) and have been there for generations so the local law enforcement care to a degree. But up North, it is dog-eat-dog and nobody will care.

    …If Mexicans can do your job, you are screwed. Again, if you expect the government that is for whatever reason allowing them to take whatever labor job uneducated whites can obtain to care, you are naive. The government doesn’t care if Filipinos and Mexicans replace whites as janitors.

    …Middle-class and upper-class people really ignore the lower class. If you attend college, you know this.

    …Uneducated people believe what the government says. College students don’t believe a single word of it. The only thing positive college will do is to teach a person that the government is lying.

    …College-educated women don’t have out-of-wedlock kids. That is a lower class phenomenon of blacks, Hispanics and rural white people.

    …It is much harder for college graduates to be misled by the media. They don’t believe it.

    …College graduates often travel or live overseas. So we are not the blind patriots who support wars and then regret. Many non-college graduates have never even been to Canada.

    So this is a typical college opinion. I’m sure I sound like a cynical limousine liberal. I probably am. But unlike some of the Polish guys I knew in Detroit, I’m not sitting in a house in a bad neighborhood unable to move.

    As an addendum, I would say college graduates understand better how financial systems work.

  168. Sunshine says:
    @jeff stryker

    There are a lot of Shaneequas and foreigners that cannot speak English, with degrees. Many of the “educated” I’ve known, don’t live better than the uneducated. Or, at least, they don’t live a life that I would want to live.

    I am in the rural Deep South now, but I was born and raised in Northern Virginia. I’m well aware of the Northeast “culture”, and I am singularly unsuited to it. I was uninterested in living life in that way. I didn’t want to work a full day, then go to school, come home to a depressing and insanely overpriced apartment in a “diverse” neighborhood, and get up the next day and do it all over again. That is Hell on earth, to me. Not to mention the traffic, the police state, the endless taxes and fees and nickel and diming BS that exists there.

    I worked “good” office jobs and grunt work, both. Honestly, I preferred the grunt work. It kept me thin and in shape. But I did it until I got married, and now I’m a housewife.

    Maybe I got lucky. I basically live a life that is pretty rare nowadays, but it’s traditional and I love it. None of the “independent, educated college womyn” seem to be happy with their lives, although they do have nicer material items than I do. So it’s a trade off. I couldn’t care less about buying stuff. I live like my grandparents did, in many ways, by choice.

    I don’t feel like I missed out on anything. I chose to not attend college because I couldn’t imagine paying for the propaganda that I received in public schools (and the punishment grades because I dared to have a dissenting opinion). I had no desire to be another cog in a machine that powers a system I find abhorrent. The “rewards” that others reap by supporting and fueling the system, do not interest me.

    I live in a white area in a safe county, and the worries about “neighborhoods declining” here aren’t relevant. That is a concern of my family in Northern VA though. The neighborhood I grew up in, was nice, white and safe, but is now overpriced yet full of foreigners. My white children could not attend school anywhere in northern Virginia, especially not the county I grew up in.

    All of this to say, I was not born to run on that treadmill. If others choose to do so, that’s fine. It’s their life, their choice and I respect it. But I don’t want it and I definitely don’t regret walking away from it all and pursuing the life I want. I will encourage my children to learn useful trades and skills. That is the one thing I wish I had been able to pursue.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    , @jeff stryker
  169. There are feminine gay men, but there are also very masculine gay men. Buttgieg is one of them.

  170. Anonymous[102] • Disclaimer says:

    Women like you are both rare and precious today. Thank you.

  171. @Sunshine


    Well I assume your husband has a degree or trade and foots the bill. Obviously, a younger woman who finds a decent husband can get by. It is a bit different for me. That is why more men are homeless. Its unlikely that any male is going to latch onto a woman who will support him.

    More often, unskilled men raise their kids in bad environments. For a Northerner born in a place like Flint whose roots are in Poland or Ireland, it is not really possible for him to start over in the Deep South.

    Some unskilled males DO leave. Many of the homeless in California are not junkies but merely unskilled Midwestern males who come from cities and towns so bad that being homeless in San Francisco is better.

    Personally, being male myself, I simply bolted the US at 25. I was single and had no kids and nothing to lose by moving to Dubai. A huge feeling of relief fell over me being overseas. I’ve never cared at all about what I left behind.

    Did I mention I FACEBOOKED Stanley the Polish guy who dropped out of college to marry his girlfriend in Flint when he got her pregnant? Yes, I think I did. He raised his kid in a bad neighborhood in Flint which turned from a modest but tidy Polish-American enclave into a hellish slum of drug dealers and prostitutes whose customers left condoms on his driveway after doing the deed outside at night. Stanley could not give his house away, much less sell it. Its a tale similar in many Northern cities.

    Compare his life to mine. Which is nothing special except that with no kids or spouse I can live overseas and never have to witness another “chimpout” on a bus or feel the glaring eyes of Mexican gangs on my neck walking in Phoenix (Where I was nearly jumped by them).

    I’ve enjoyed a life overseas in a warm climate where I could walk to the store at 4 AM if I wanted. No hassle, no fears.

  172. Not sure it’s fair to imply neuroticism is a negative trait politically speaking, people high in neuroticism and conscientiousness are particularly helpful to have around (two traits that women exhibit more than men) – they manage stress well, use their anxieties as fuel to be more productive, and tend to be more organized. A little extra worry might do an institution a world of good.

    So “successful politicians” score significantly lower than the general public in neuroticism and “world-changing statesmen” score higher in psychopathology, narcissism as well as some addition of the former, so what? These are very specific suites of traits that are all over the board in terms of gender leanings but we’re supposed to be concerned when the women who find themselves in these positions don’t represent the standard female personality profile? What about the men, the ones who find themselves with these combinations are not a typical male profile either. What horror could be lurking under that rock?


    It’s telling that the piece begins with dragging a more feminine trait like neuroticism through the mud while letting the extreme difference in psychopathy (a disorder, mind you, with a 10:1 – 20:1 ratio, not a personality trait with polarities), something that prevails in a myriad of positions of control, sail on through. The pattern is predictable – accept the male flaws as the cost of doing business and ignore/defame female strengths or only acknowledge them when they’re in the private sphere or not in a position of authority.

    If this confluence of female support for refugees (and I suppose by extension immigration in general), empathy, and leaning left is actually true (real data, not speculation), then how does one account for reverse gender cleavages in anti-immigrant attitudes in Europe, the almost negligible difference in refugee favorability among men and women in the Netherlands, the positive view of immigration among US millennial men and women etc?

    All in all, I really do not understand the strategy of the men “on the right” continuing to beat these incendiary gender issues (leadership, suffrage) to death. These issues do not seem cut and dry at all and they really better be (at least for a rational person who wants to succeed) to merit the inflammatory response they provoke. It alienates the best women (probably the best men too, at least the ones who don’t have a massive capacity for compartmentalization) and also the average, the very same needed to mainstream, and like a self-fulfilling prophecy retains the weak, insane, and desperate for approval. Do you really believe in your own genocide or not?

    • Replies: @peterAUS
  173. peterAUS says:

    Do you really believe in your own genocide or not?

    My take: no, they do not.
    I mean, majority of “alt-Light/conservative/whatever” do not really believe in that.

    Yes, they talk about it a lot. I wouldn’t confuse that with what they really, deep down, think, feel or believe.
    And, the last but not the least, we do live in the paradigm where communication uses totally overblown language across the spectrum.

    Read/listen to anything in public today. To get the true measure you need to cut it down to 20% of the original. At least.

    If Whites, in West, were really concerned about own genocide..oh my…all this would’ve been totally different.

    At the moment they are concerned, mostly, about the loss of good jobs.
    Tiny minority about the loss of intellectual freedom.

    That’s all.

    Twenty years from now, well…that could be a different story.

    My take, anyway.

  174. Anonymous [AKA "Biker"] says:

    I could have written everything you said here, Sunshine. I too am a homemaker in a traditional family and I’m sad that our lifestyle, which is by far the one most conducive to everyone’s mental and physical health, has become such a rarity. I don’t own a smartphone, and I always have been a bookworm-that includes a lot of non-fiction! Ditto especially to your observation about the worthlessness and viciousness of most other women in this messed-up post-modern, post-feminism world. My older female relatives, now almost all passed on, behaved with a kind of grace and emotional steadiness (think Donna Reed in “It’s a Wonderful Life”) that is seldom seen among women today. I just want almost all of them to leave me alone, which luckily I have been able to arrange. But the female incompetents and criminals infesting higher office all over the West, are a much tougher problem to solve.

  175. Anon[202] • Disclaimer says:

    The politics of women are inherently self-centered and violent, given that they do not have the physical capacity for consistent physical violence and require an alternate outlet. It follows that women live in their politics rather than despise them. Whereas it is the man’s nature fight to find away above politics in order to get things done for the good of the wider group. When they need to be violent, it is indeed on the battlefield of life or war. But that is much more rare than the everyday social and political violence of women.

    Given that you lack intellectual capacity, such accurate abstract reasoning is naturally above your ability. I suggest that you stick to ditch digging, working at Starbucks, etc instead of attempting to politically participate in anything meaningful. For the good of society.

Current Commenter

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone

 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Lance Welton Comments via RSS
The Shaping Event of Our Modern World
The Hidden Information in Our Government Archives
Analyzing the History of a Controversial Movement
The unspoken statistical reality of urban crime over the last quarter century.
How America was neoconned into World War IV