The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 Thomas Dalton Archive
America Must Die—So That the People Can Live
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

When you live in a 200-year-old house, you would do well to give it a thorough inspection every few years. Rap on the walls, pull down some old wallpaper, climb into the attic, and get down into the crawl space. Check the roofing, check the exterior walls, check the foundation. You are looking for signs of rot: decay, mold, insects, rodents, or just plain aging. With luck, you find one or two small problems, you patch them up, and all is well. Unfortunately, sometimes all is not well. Sometimes, you find signs of major and irreparable decay. In those cases, and as painful as it may be, you must be prepared to tear the house down and start anew. Anything less would be a lost cause, an act of utter futility.

America today is a 245-year-old house—a grand mansion with many rooms, situated on a wonderfully vast and glorious estate. From the outside, from a distance, it still looks nice: glitzy, glamorous, wealthy, powerful, exciting. It still carries much from its well-intentioned (if flawed) beginnings. But our inspection proves otherwise. When we rap on the walls, or get up in the ceiling, or crawl down to the foundations, we are shocked to find signs of widespread and irreparable decay. The main timbers supporting the building are rife with termites; the roof is leaking; the foundation is cracked, the sands beneath are eroding, and all manner of vermin are running wild, both above and below. In short, it is a horrible mess. We try to plaster over holes here and there, and slap on some new paint once in a while, but the rot inevitably shows through. By any reasonable accounting, the building is on the verge of collapse. It may come down on its own, or we can be proactive and take it down, but down it will come.

Any viable nation is not only an edifice; it is a living entity. It lives and breathes with the people in it. Our house is a living house; but sadly, it is terminally ill. A combination of old age, disease, neglect, and poor hygiene have put it in a terrible state, one that is evidently beyond any hope of recovery or repair. The house must come down; America must die—in order for a new house, a new nation, to arise. Such is life.

It is worthwhile, then, to review my brief ‘inspection report’ of the American nation, and to diagnose the ailments that we are currently enduring. If I am able to get down to root causes, this will naturally lead to some prescribed courses of action that we can take, both near-term and for the longer haul. No one wants to live in a rotting house. No one wants to live in a decaying nation. No one wants their children and grandchildren to grow up in such conditions. We have better options.

At the highest level, my inspection report finds two major, and related, areas of concern: (1) a false notion of human equality, and (2) misplaced faith in the doctrine of democracy. Further analysis shows that these two aspects have been ruthlessly and malevolently exploited by a potent Jewish lobby to maximize benefit to themselves. In what follows, I will attempt to outline the nature of this far-reaching and deep-rooted crisis, and to suggest some ways forward.

The False and Destructive Concept of Equality

In 1927, and four years before he penned Brave New World, famed writer, thinker, and “casual anti-Semite” Aldous Huxley published a compelling little book called Proper Studies. It opens with an essay titled “The Idea of Equality.” The very first line reads as follows:

That all men are equal is a proposition to which, at ordinary times, no sane human being has ever given his assent. (p. 1)

Doctors, editors, bureaucrats—any person, in any walk of life, displays evident and obvious inequalities, says Huxley. People are different in every way imaginable: skills, abilities, interests, intelligence, appearance, character. Everyone acknowledges this, and yet at the same time they also want to insist on the essential and intrinsic equality of humans. Hence does Huxley write of the human mind’s “almost infinite capacity for being inconsistent.” He then describes the basic axiom at work:

Politicians and political philosophers have often talked about the equality of man as though it were a necessary and unavoidable idea, an idea which human beings must believe in, just as they must, from the very nature of their physical and mental constitution, believe in such notions as weight, heat, and light. Man is “by nature free, equal, and independent,” says Locke,[1]Second Treatise on Civil Government (1690), chapter 8, section 95. with the calm assurance of one who knows he cannot be contradicted. It would be possible to quote literally thousands of similar pronouncements. (p. 2)

He identifies the original source of this fallacy in Aristotle, whose metaphysical assumption of a human essence (as “the rational animal”; Nicomachean Ethics I.8, 13) implies a sort of equality among the human species. Against Huxley, we can argue that this does not quite follow; the existence of a common and distinctive quality of all humans need not imply their social, political, or existential equality, any more than the fact that all material objects have mass imply that they all have the same weight.[2]And in fact, Aristotle’s later discussion of the “great-souled man” (Nicomachean Ethics IV.3) demonstrates conclusively that he believed in vast difference among men. Huxley also fixes some blame on Descartes, but again, this is perhaps an exaggerated claim. In Discourse on Method (1637), Descartes writes:

Good sense is the best distributed thing in the world. … It indicates that the power of judging well and of distinguishing the true from the false—which is what we properly call ‘good sense’ or ‘reason’—is naturally equal in all men. … [A]s regards reason or sense, since it is the only thing that makes us men and distinguishes us from the beasts, I am inclined to believe that it exists whole and complete in each of us.[3]The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, volume one, Cambridge University Press (1985), pp. 111-112.

Even if we allow that reason is equal in all—a highly dubious assertion, to say the least—it still does not imply political, social, or moral equality.

More to the point, Huxley cites Christian doctrine and the position of the Church. Even granting a “brotherhood of men” under Christ, “the brotherhood of men does not imply their equality.” He continues: “Neither does men’s equality before God imply their equality as among themselves.” Even if God, from his divine and lofty standpoint, views us all as equals, any putative inter-human equality “is entirely irrelevant”.[4]Indeed, explicit human equality exists nowhere in the Bible. Paul claims in Galatians (3:28) that “there is neither Jew nor Greek” under Jesus and that “we are all one in Christ Jesus.” But this only says that all are welcome into his nascent universalist church; it does not support the idea that all are equal. And more importantly, there are very good reasons for believing that Paul held to the most obnoxious form of Jewish supremacism, and thus did not believe in human equality in the least; see my essays “Christianity: The great Jewish hoax” and “Nietzsche and the origins of Christianity.” It is rather like us viewing all ants or mice as identical when in fact they all recognize and acknowledge vast differences among themselves.

All this bodes ill for the “religion of democracy,” says Huxley (and as I will elaborate). Its “primary assumption” is that “all men are substantially equal.” If the equality falls, so too falls democracy. He summarizes concisely:

The historical and psychological researches of the past century have rendered the theory which lies behind the practice of modern democracy entirely untenable. Reason is not the same in all men; human beings belong to a variety of psychological types separated from one another by irreducible differences. (p. 12)

Science, anthropology, philosophy, and common sense all come to the same conclusion: human equality is a fallacy, and any political ideology based on that notion is doomed to failure.

Huxley, of course, was hardly alone in his condemnation of a claimed human equality. Nietzsche viewed the idea with greater contempt and wrote in more scathing terms. We find, especially in Beyond Good and Evil, a stunning repudiation of the concept. His elaborations on the “order of rank” among men, the “instinct for rank,” the “noble soul,” and the necessity for human greatness, pervade the work. A few examples will have to suffice:

Men, not noble enough to see the abysmally different order of rank, the chasm of rank, between man and man—such men have so far held sway over the fate of Europe, with their “equal before God,” until finally a smaller, almost ridiculous type, a herd animal, something eager to please, sickly, and mediocre has been bred, the European of today. (sec. 62)

The highest and strongest drives, when they break out passionately and drive the individual far above the average and the flats of the herd conscience, wreck the self-confidence of the community, its faith in itself, and it is as if its spine snapped. Hence just these drives are branded and slandered most. High and independent spirituality, the will to stand alone, even a powerful reason are experienced as dangers; everything that elevates an individual above the herd and intimidates the neighbor is henceforth called evil; and the fair, modest, submissive, conforming mentality, the mediocrity of desires attains moral designations and honors. (sec. 201)

Every enhancement of the type ‘man’ has so far been the work of an aristocratic society—a society that believes in the long ladder of an order of rank and differences in value between man and man. (sec. 257)

The concept of equality is ultimately destructive because it declares, not only that no one is worse than anyone else, but more importantly that no one is better than anyone else—yes, that no one can be better. True self-betterment and self-enhancement become impossible if we are all equal. No matter what you do, you will still be only, and always, equal to the very least among men. This doctrine is not merely false; it is utterly contemptible and destructive of higher aims and goals. It means the death of humanity. Where we do not ascend, we decline; this is Nietzsche’s basic outlook. Sadly, it conforms to the actual world in which we live today.

In the final passage above, Nietzsche points to a central fact and thus to a possible solution. If every improvement to humanity and to society has occurred in aristocratic societies—that is, rule by the best—then we ought logically to use those as our model. Societies that are capable of sorting men into lesser and greater types, and to do so effectively, are the drivers of human evolution. They strive for greatness, and they create greatness. Even the smallest steps in that direction—such as were taken by Hitler in his National Socialist Germany—would be such an improvement over the present day that any nation even attempting it would likely flourish spectacularly; and in fact, this is precisely what happened in Germany, beginning in 1933. The rest of the equality-obsessed, Jewish-inspired world was so aghast that they were compelled to drive the remaining industrial nations against Hitler and to destroy him, so fearsome was the prospect of his success.

Still, entrenched myths die hard. We in the US have our treasured Declaration of Independence, which declares as “self-evident”—with the calm assurance of those who know they cannot be contradicted—that “all men are created equal.” As we know, this was disingenuous at best. For one, they indeed meant ‘men,’ given that women could neither vote nor hold office. And they meant ‘White men,’ given that all the Founders were White Anglo-Saxons, and many were slaveholders or otherwise endorsed slavery. Hence that famous phrase really meant “all White males are created equal”—though even that is demonstrably untrue, as I have argued.

Original Democracy

Huxley had it exactly right: support for modern democracy is in fact more of a belief system, or even a faith, than something grounded in history, reason, and philosophy. Like many other religions, democracy derives from a core of historical truth—here, in ancient Greece—that was then altered beyond recognition by an accretion of layers of myth, lie, and corruption. Today we have the belief, the faith, by all sides, “left” and “right” alike,[5]Though, as I have recently argued in “The problem with leftism,” both the Left and the Right are “fakes,” which explains why they both adhere to similar nonsense, and why they both supplicate to the Jewish Lobby. that democracy is an unquestioned virtue, that it must be defended at all costs, and that it must be spread to the world, even at the point of a gun. This is a fundamental political error, founded on an erroneous and detrimental conception of human equality; it must be overcome if we are to survive in the long run.

Democracy wasn’t always a religion. At one time, at the beginning, it was a rational and effective (though not unproblematic) means of self-government. Let’s take a minute to examine the original democracy of ancient Greece to see what worked and what did not.

Athenian democracy was a remarkable institution, and remarkably different than what passes for democracy today. To begin with, the population of the state (or polis) was small—it constituted only some 300,000 people at its peak, which included many slaves and foreigners. By modern standards, this seems tiny but, for the time, it was extremely large. Of this number, the only formal citizens were the adult native-born males, numbering perhaps 30,000, or just 10 percent of the population. These citizens—the demos, the people—were the formal basis of political power, rather than some ruling wealthy elite (also known as oligarchs or plutocrats), or some tyrannical dictator, as could be found in other Greek states.

The democratic system, inaugurated by Cleisthenes around 500 BC, functioned in a very different way than we might expect. For one, there were no elections; all leadership positions (apart from the military) were chosen by lot, at random, from among the citizens who had put forth their names. This included even the leader of the Assembly—the collected body of citizens—who was effectively the president of the nation, though without much formal power. The Greeks had invented a device called a kleroterion into which names were randomly inserted on small tokens; colored dice were then deployed to select names randomly and fairly from among the various tribes or families. The system had several virtues: immediate results, no costly or corrupted election campaigns, fairness, transparency, and an equal involvement of all concerned. The Greeks clearly had to be nice to all their fellow (Athenian male) citizens, any one of whom could someday have a position of prominence.

Secondly, there were no representatives. Athens was a famously direct democracy. All interested citizens gathered on a large open hilltop, called the Pnyx, roughly once per month, to listen to the issues of the day. When the time came for decisions, a very public show of hands determined the outcome. Even the gravest of matters, such as going to war, were decided this way. This is all the more striking when we consider that the army was composed of the very men who had themselves just voted for war. In other words, when you voted for war, you personally went to war. And many never returned. We can only imagine a similar situation in America today: that the Congressmen and women who support the next illegal and unjust foreign war[6]Actually, in America we don’t have wars anymore; we have “authorized uses of military force” or AUMFs. This is Congress’ cowardly way to kill others on behalf of their lobbyists and patrons without having to vote for an actual war. would be compelled to be on the first combat plane into the warzone. I suspect that we would have very few wars indeed.

In sum, Athenian democracy was small, direct, accountable, and transparent. The wealthy elite had very little power to steer events in their favor. The citizenry comprised only native men; foreigners had literally no voice in the state, even though they outnumbered the actual citizens by a factor of two or three. Greek democracy was thus a racial (White European), ethnic (Athenian), and gendered (men only) system of rule. And it worked incredibly well; it produced and sustained the brilliant Athenian culture that we know today.

Two Famous Critics

For all that, the system had some harsh and prominent critics—notably, Plato and Aristotle. Plato had two main complaints against democracy: First, he asked, why should all the citizens get to vote on key decisions? Why are they all treated as equals, one vote per man? This is illogical and counterproductive. Even in Athens, they had their share of dunces, dimwits, and degenerates. Why let these men vote? Why not let only the best, the wisest, vote? For that matter, why have votes at all? Why not just determine who are your wisest few, and let them rule? This was Plato’s vision of an aristocracy, the optimal form of government. It is, at least in theory, far superior to anything like a democracy.

Plato’s second concern was, ironically, with freedom itself. In a democracy, since “the people” rule, anything goes. Whatever the people want, the people get. And the people—the masses—rarely want the kinds of things that they should want, namely, virtue and discipline. Rather, they want to have fun: they want to do one thing one day, and something else the next, as it suits their fancy. They are ‘free,’ after all. They want to play games, engage in various petty amusements, fill their bellies, get drunk, and so on. As it was then, so it is now; human nature has scarcely changed in two millennia.

Plato is scalding in his attack. The “democratic man” is inundated by all manner of trivial and detrimental desires. True and deep thoughts are driven from his soul, and “false and boastful conceits and phrases mount upwards and take their place” (Republic Bk 8; 560c):

And so the young man returns to the country of the [pleasure-seeking] lotus-eaters, and takes up his dwelling there in the face of all men. … There is a battle and [the false and boastful words] gain the day, and then modesty, which they call ‘silliness’, is ignominiously thrust into exile by them, and temperance, which they nickname ‘unmanliness’, is trampled in the mire and cast forth. They persuade men that moderation and frugal spending are vulgarity and meanness, and so, by the help of a rabble of evil appetites, they drive them out.

And when they have emptied and swept clean the soul of him who is now in their power and who is being initiated by them in great mysteries, the next thing is to bring back to their house insolence and anarchy and waste and impudence in bright array, having garlands on their heads, and a great company with them, hymning their praises and calling them by sweet names. Arrogance they term ‘good-breeding’, and anarchy ‘freedom’, and waste ‘magnificence’, and impudence ‘courage’. And so the young man passes out of his original nature, which was trained in the school of necessity, into the freedom and libertinism of useless and unnecessary pleasures. (560d-e)

And if wiser thoughts come calling, and if they struggle for predominance in his soul, he becomes confused; “he shakes his head and says that they are all alike, and that one is as good as another.” He has lost the ability to judge and to discriminate, which degrades his entire life:

His life has neither law nor order; and this distracted existence he terms ‘joy’ and ‘bliss’ and ‘freedom’; and so he goes on… [H]e is all ‘freedom’ and ‘equality.’

Hence the democratic man. His precious freedom, given unrestrained license and lack of discipline, devolves into mindless and confused pleasure-seeking. He believes he has freedom, and he believes in equality—but this is a sham; it is a false equality and the freedom of a shallow and vapid libertine. Plato sums up the situation on democracy with one of the most striking sentences in the Republic:

These and other kindred characteristics are proper to democracy, which is a charming form of government, full of variety and disorder, and dispensing a sort of equality to equals and unequals alike. (558c)

“Charming” and “disordered” democracy, so “fair and spangled,” is all show and no substance. It encourages undisciplined, unvirtuous lives of hedonistic pleasure. And most importantly, it “dispenses a sort of equality to equals and unequals alike.” Such a democracy, he says, can only lead in turn to the lowest form of government, tyranny.

I haven’t the space to elaborate, but in short, Aristotle basically agreed with this analysis. He identified three primary forms of government, each of which had good and bad versions. In descending order, the three good systems are monarchy (rule by one), aristocracy (rule by a small and wise few), and a ‘constitution’ (conditional rule by many). The distorted or bad forms of each of these are tyranny, oligarchy, and democracy.[7]Politics III.7. In this sense, for Aristotle, democracy is literally ‘the worst of the worst.’ It is rule by the poor and needy masses, not the best or noblest few.

Industrial Democracy

What, then, of democracy in the world today? We have variations on the democratic theme that are so remote from the Athenian original that they hardly deserve the same name. They have lost all the virtues of the original but retained all the vices. Democracy today has devolved into a crude perversion that I like to call industrial democracy. Its primary characteristics are these:

1) Representative (parliamentarian) system—no direct participation.
2) Universal suffrage—all adults can vote.
3) Multiracial—all races can vote.
4) Unlimited population size.
5) Financially corrupt—moneyed interests (especially Jewish) hold great sway.

On every point, this is opposed to the Athenian model. We vote, but typically only for a handful of pre-determined candidates or on a very limited number of referenda. Our representation is scaled down by a factor of thousands or millions; a state as large as California, with almost 40 million people, gets all of two senators.[8]It does get 53 federal representatives, but even here, each represents the interests of an average of 750,000 very diverse individuals. And every half-witted, uneducated ignoramus gets his or her vote—people who vastly outnumber the educated and the wise. (And we wonder why the intellectual level of political campaigns is so low.) People of every race can vote, and they often do so in their own racial interest, thus guaranteeing a divided and conflicted government. Perhaps most critically, the original small size of the Athenian citizen body, some 30,000 individuals, now numbers almost 250 million—the number of eligible American adults.

The vast size and scale of representation ensures that billions of corrupting dollars flow through the system, distorting even the most virtuous lawmaker, and guaranteeing a flood of media confusion, propaganda, and “fake news.” Industrial democracy is rule by money: those with the most money, and the will to spend it, rule. In America, we know who leads this race: the Jewish lobby, which contributes at least 50% of Democratic campaign funds and at least 25% of Republican funds. Wealthy American Jews spend literally hundreds of millions on campaigns, ads, donations, and various other activities, all to influence the outcome in their favored direction.[9]See my elaborations in “The problem with leftism” and “Confronting the Judeocracy.” The situation is comparable in the UK, Canada, France, and Australia, all of which have relatively large and wealthy Jewish populations.[10]I emphasize “relative.” Jewish percentages of these four nations range from 0.4 to 1.0%. Normally this should be inconsequential, but with wealthy and pernicious Jews, it poses substantial problems. The lesson here is that any nation seeking to free itself from the Jewish Lobby had best restrict Jewish numbers to something well below 0.1%. The ancient Greeks—most of them, at least—would be appalled to see what their cherished democracy has come to.

As it is, we now have that which Plato predicted: democracy on the brink of degenerating into tyranny of various forms. We have tyrannies of the rich, tyrannies of the Judeocracy, and tyrannies of Big Tech, all vying for power, and all cooperating as needed to ensure that nothing like transparent and accountable government ever comes to pass. The main objective of the rich is to stay rich, and to maintain or grow the wealth gap between themselves and the masses; the larger the disparity, the more relative power they hold. The main objective of the Judeocracy, of the Jewish power-elite, is to weaken and damage the national psyche sufficiently, and to diversify and deplete the nation genetically, so that they can maintain maximum control without completely destroying the wealth-producing capacity of the economy. Under industrial democracy, the future is grim indeed.

America, sadly, has been completely subsumed by this pernicious and insidious form of government. The country is ruled by the lowest, most depraved, most incompetent individuals imaginable. At the same time, it is being flooded by the virtual scum of humanity—in July 2021 alone, over 212,000 arrests (“encounters”, in the government’s euphemistic propaganda) occurred at the southern border.[11]Of course, not all illegal immigrants are scum. But from everything we know, a very high proportion of them are from the lowest, least intelligent, and most criminal segments of humanity. And since virtually all of them are non-White, even the best will alter the nature of our traditionally White society. How many more evaded “encounter” and entered the country illegally, we do not know. And to these numbers we must add the “legal” immigration of large numbers of non-European, non-White individuals who inevitably change the character of the nation for the worse. The combined effect is dramatic. A recent study stated that the US now has an astonishing 44 million people who were foreign-born, of which about 75% are legal and 25% are illegal.[12]Though the actual number of illegals could be much higher than the presumed 11 million. One recent study argued that the true figure could be as high as 29 million. Nearly half of these millions were born in just five countries: Mexico, China, India, Philippines, and El Salvador. Surely not more than a percent or two of these 44 million are White. The grand edifice that is America is collapsing as we speak.

Therefore, it is time to accept reality and give up America for lost. Put away your flags, your pins, and all your red-white-and-blue paraphernalia. Toss out your MAGA hats; America will never be “great again.” Anyone who tells you otherwise is a liar or a fool. The country is rotting from above and below. Vermin are calling the shots from on high, and human detritus washes in over the borders. This was precisely how Ancient Rome fell. Such is the terminal stage of many an empire.

Looking Ahead

If this report on the fatal condition of America is close to the mark, it also suggests corrective actions that must be taken to regain a sane and stable civic life, at least for the White Euro-Americans who established and ran the country for most of its existence. The necessary actions are hardly a secret. The basic ideas are already floating around the Internet. Andrew Anglin, for one, was right on the mark in his recent essay on immigration. His conclusion:

The only way we are going to fix this [immigration] problem is through a two-fold solution: 1) Redrawing the borders of the country, and 2) Physically removing tens of millions of people. There is no situation where both of those things are not going to be necessary in the future.

He is absolutely right.[13]Now, if we could only get Anglin to drop his allegiance to the Judeo-Christian God and to that long-dead Jewish rabbi, he would be much better off. Those are two necessary, but not sufficient, conditions for the restoration of rational government among the White population today.

More specifically, my above analysis suggests the following steps: (a) Break up the existing United States into smaller, more cohesive, more homogenous, and more manageable units. (b) In these new units, encourage all non-Whites, and especially all Jews, to emigrate as soon as possible. (c) Discard the pernicious concept of human equality and replace it by a celebration of the higher, the nobler, and the best. (d) Replace industrial democracy with something like an aristocracy. Let me close by offering a few words of elaboration on each.

More and more people these days seem to be recognizing the desirability and the inevitability of secession of portions of the US, and the establishment of new, independent nation-states. In fact, as the nation continues to disintegrate, at some point people will have no choice; thus, it is better to plan now than to wait for some chaotic future breakdown.

Some of the current talk on secession has the right intent but is woefully weak and misguided. One can find articles like “Is America still our country?” and “The separation,” but these are pathetically half-hearted. Breaking up existing states but staying within America is a wholly insufficient form of secession. The “6 Californias” idea is very weak; “Greater Idaho” is well-intentioned but falls way short of the mark. None of these explicitly advocates breaking away from the US and forming new nations. Only full-blown secession can hope to get to the root of the problem. The reigning Judeocracy knows this, which is why they do everything in their power to discredit the idea.

Point (b) is mandatory for restoring effective and rational governance. Blacks, Asians, Hispanics, and Jews all have countries of origin; they need to return there with all due haste. After a short period of voluntary compliance, increasing pressure will need to be applied until they comply. Yes, Whites could theoretically return to Europe, except that Whites created and built up the present civilization (such as it is) of the USA, and thus have earned a right to stay and to evict the interlopers.[14]Yes, Black African slaves and Chinese coolies “built” portions of the early US. But they provided only the low-end brute labor, not the organizational or intellectual basis for the nation. To give them credit for building America would be akin to giving credit to the oxen and draft horses of the early pioneers. Native Americans were of course here before the White Europeans, and that precedence needs to be respected, such as via truly autonomous homelands. And since Blacks were forcibly brought here from Africa (with heavy Jewish involvement[15]See Louis Farrakhan’s book The Secret Relationship between Blacks and Jews (3 volumes).), I would have no issue with assisting their return to Africa with subsidized travel arrangements, a small one-time cash payment, or with the use of political leverage in Africa to aid their repatriation. We can ease the transition, but out they must go.

The hardest to deal with will of course be the Jews. With their political clout, wealth, and bull-headed tenacity, they will be very hard to root out. The task is made all the more difficult because of the inability of our supposedly “conservative Right” to address the Jewish Question in a meaningful way. Most all prominent rightwing individuals and organizations flee from the Question like the devil from holy water. As I have noted elsewhere, Fox News and crew—Carlson, Hannity, et al—never explicitly mention Jews, never out them, and never criticize them in any way; Hannity in fact bends over backward to curry favor. Alex Jones never criticizes or outs Jews. Same with Jared Taylor. American Renaissance won’t deal with the Jewish Question in a serious way. Breitbart at least discusses them, but always in a neutral or positive light. The real critics are, sadly, few and far between; to reiterate what I wrote recently, we need to be extremely grateful for The Occidental Observer, Unz.com, National Vanguard, and people like Anglin, all of whom are willing to speak the hard truth on the Jewish Question.

Point (c) obviously follows from the above discussion. We must drop all talk of human equality and replace it with a promotion and celebration of human uniqueness and human greatness. This needs to be made explicit in common discourse, media, and school curricula. We need to celebrate and praise human genius while emphasizing the fact that most people are not geniuses and will never achieve greatness, but who can nonetheless have meaningful and valuable lives. When it is understood that humans never were, and never will be, equal, then all become free to achieve their full potential and, for those who succeed in bettering themselves, to reap the rewards of exceptional development. In a just society, exceptional individuals will earn additional rights, but they will also bear additional duties, compared to the lesser. “Equal” performance for the various subgroups of people—as distinguished by gender, age, socio-economic status, ethnicity, etc.—will never be expected or mandated. “Racial equality” will be a nonissue.

On the final point, it is clear that the hopelessly corrupt industrial democracy must go. We can also be confident that something like an aristocracy would be a vast (if imperfect) improvement, even as there is much leeway in the specific details. If we allow that “rule by the wiser” is superior to “rule by the masses,” then we have many ways to realize such a system. At the simplest level, we could retain elections for officeholders but permit only the wiser—smarter, more educated, more accomplished—individuals to vote. It could be very basic: require that voters earn a college degree, for example; or score above average on an IQ test; or distinguish themselves in some other relevant way (an exceptional athlete, by contrast, earns no right to a voice on political issues). The disenfranchised would not be made to feel inferior; rather, they would come to accept such a system as in the best interests of all.

At a more sophisticated level, we might move to adopt something like a Platonic education system, as laid out in the Republic. There he sketches a 50-year training program involving age-appropriate schooling, skills training, physical fitness, and practical experience that both educates the masses and serves as a filtering process to determine who the truly wisest and most capable leaders are. A series of pass-fail criteria progressively reduce the pool of eligible candidates, leaving, at the end, a mere handful of individuals who have repeatedly proven themselves under pressure. In a future aristocracy, a small pool of “the best” could be added annually to a kind of ruling congress who would then be unconditionally empowered to make and enforce all laws and policies. After a fixed term of governance, each individual would be compelled to retire in turn. Again, this is just one way of realizing such a system. Variations might include finding ways to identify and empower the truly exceptional individuals—or perhaps a single individual—and give them correspondingly exceptional powers to rule.

In any case, the system would need to be recognized by the vast majority of people as an effective and desirable solution. In this sense, it would retain a small flavor of traditional democracy. “Consent of the governed” can work, as long as the population is not too large and as long as we do not have to contend with competing racial minorities or Jewish financial corruption. But such consent is a far cry from universal suffrage or rule by the masses, which can never work, and which always degenerates.

Such is my basic outline of a path forward. Obviously, much more needs to be said. But it is a start, one that addresses the root causes of our present crisis.[16]Elsewhere I have argued that Hitler’s National Socialism can also be a model going forward. His nationalism created an ethnic-based sense of unity and purpose that far exceeded mindless patriotism, and his socialism served as an antidote to unrestrained finance capitalism. There are many good lessons to be learned there. Interested readers should start with my recent edition of Mein Kampf, and with my newly-reworked edition of Alfred Rosenberg’s classic, The Myth of the 20th Century.

I close with this thought: To the extent that America ever was great, this is because, at the start, it was roughly modeled on the Athenian original. The early American government was gendered, racial, and ethnic—White males of a predominantly north European stock. And it stayed that way for nearly 100 years.[17]Black males were granted the right to vote in 1866, and women (of all races) in 1920. The celebrated American “diversity” at the beginning was a diversity among Whites: English, Scots, Irish, Dutch, Germans, and Scandinavians all would have been represented in those early years. Yes, America had significant numbers of Blacks and Jews from the 1600s, but they had limited or no political influence. Religion was of secondary importance. Yes, it was nominally a “Christian nation” at the start, but few among the Founders were deeply religious—Patrick Henry, Samuel Adams, and John Jay being the exceptions—and most were skeptical believers or deists, if not functional atheists.

Hence, early America prospered and flourished in spite of, not because of, Christianity; in spite of, not because of, Blacks and Jews; and in spite of, not because of, the principle of equality. Blacks, Jews, “equality,” and Christianity were millstones around the young nation’s neck. It is a testament to our initially gendered and racial governance that we accomplished so much in those early years, with such huge burdens to bear. Two centuries later, those millstones proved to be our ruination.

America is dying a slow and painful death. Let us euthanize the long-suffering nation, redraw the boundaries, rethink the guiding principles, and begin again.

Thomas Dalton, PhD, has authored or edited several books and articles on politics, history, and religion, with a special focus on National Socialism in Germany. His works include a new translation series of Mein Kampf, and the books Eternal Strangers (2020), The Jewish Hand in the World Wars (2019), and Debating the Holocaust (4th ed, 2020). Most recently he has edited a new edition of Rosenberg’s classic work Myth of the 20th Century and a new book of political cartoons, Pan-Judah!. All these works are available at www.clemensandblair.com. For all his writings, see his personal website www.thomasdaltonphd.com.

Notes

[1] Second Treatise on Civil Government (1690), chapter 8, section 95.

[2] And in fact, Aristotle’s later discussion of the “great-souled man” (Nicomachean Ethics IV.3) demonstrates conclusively that he believed in vast difference among men.

[3] The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, volume one, Cambridge University Press (1985), pp. 111-112.

[4] Indeed, explicit human equality exists nowhere in the Bible. Paul claims in Galatians (3:28) that “there is neither Jew nor Greek” under Jesus and that “we are all one in Christ Jesus.” But this only says that all are welcome into his nascent universalist church; it does not support the idea that all are equal. And more importantly, there are very good reasons for believing that Paul held to the most obnoxious form of Jewish supremacism, and thus did not believe in human equality in the least; see my essays “Christianity: The great Jewish hoax” and “Nietzsche and the origins of Christianity.”

[5] Though, as I have recently argued in “The problem with leftism,” both the Left and the Right are “fakes,” which explains why they both adhere to similar nonsense, and why they both supplicate to the Jewish Lobby.

[6] Actually, in America we don’t have wars anymore; we have “authorized uses of military force” or AUMFs. This is Congress’ cowardly way to kill others on behalf of their lobbyists and patrons without having to vote for an actual war.

[7] Politics III.7.

[8] It does get 53 federal representatives, but even here, each represents the interests of an average of 750,000 very diverse individuals.

[9] See my elaborations in “The problem with leftism” and “Confronting the Judeocracy.”

[10] I emphasize “relative.” Jewish percentages of these four nations range from 0.4 to 1.0%. Normally this should be inconsequential, but with wealthy and pernicious Jews, it poses substantial problems. The lesson here is that any nation seeking to free itself from the Jewish Lobby had best restrict Jewish numbers to something well below 0.1%.

[11] Of course, not all illegal immigrants are scum. But from everything we know, a very high proportion of them are from the lowest, least intelligent, and most criminal segments of humanity. And since virtually all of them are non-White, even the best will alter the nature of our traditionally White society.

[12] Though the actual number of illegals could be much higher than the presumed 11 million. One recent study argued that the true figure could be as high as 29 million.

[13] Now, if we could only get Anglin to drop his allegiance to the Judeo-Christian God and to that long-dead Jewish rabbi, he would be much better off.

[14] Yes, Black African slaves and Chinese coolies “built” portions of the early US. But they provided only the low-end brute labor, not the organizational or intellectual basis for the nation. To give them credit for building America would be akin to giving credit to the oxen and draft horses of the early pioneers.

[15] See Louis Farrakhan’s book The Secret Relationship between Blacks and Jews (3 volumes).

[16] Elsewhere I have argued that Hitler’s National Socialism can also be a model going forward. His nationalism created an ethnic-based sense of unity and purpose that far exceeded mindless patriotism, and his socialism served as an antidote to unrestrained finance capitalism. There are many good lessons to be learned there. Interested readers should start with my recent edition of Mein Kampf, and with my newly-reworked edition of Alfred Rosenberg’s classic, The Myth of the 20th Century.

[17] Black males were granted the right to vote in 1866, and women (of all races) in 1920.

(Republished from The Occidental Observer by permission of author or representative)
 
Hide 310 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. Thomas Dalton: ” Indeed, explicit human equality exists nowhere in the Bible. Paul claims in Galatians (3:28) that “there is neither Jew nor Greek” under Jesus and that “we are all one in Christ Jesus.” But this only says that all are welcome into his nascent universalist church; it does not support the idea that all are equal.”

    When two or more things are “one”, they are necessarily equal to each other, because a thing is equal to itself by definition. This plain meaning is also supported by the Christian’s belief that he is not his body, but rather a “soul” only temporarily inhabiting a body. He regards this “soul” — a purely imaginary object — as being the only thing of importance. (Cf. Mark 8:36, “For what shall it profit a man, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul?”) Because this “soul” is imaginary, he is free to suppose it equal to other “souls” in any way he pleases. No one can possibly prove otherwise. Race, otoh, is a property of the body, not the “soul”. It’s easy to prove human races are unequal. Christians don’t care about that though. The Christian is concerned only with his “soul” and its fate, so to him race is necessarily unimportant.

    • Agree: Raches, RVBlake
    • Disagree: Fr. John
    • Thanks: ThreeCranes, Thor Walhovd
  2. Under the easily manipulated and indelibly corrupted “democratic” system, any solution to rebuild the U.S. of A will fail. When the rotten house finally goes down, the “democracy” will degenerate into an olygarchic tyranny that now has all the means for an absolute control of the society. The slavish acceptance of the vaxx mandates is the best proof. The fiefdoms of multibillioners will be surrounded by the favelas of people living in the metaverse on the universal minimal income. The blockchain dollar and the nation-wide genotyping passports will secure this system’s stability.

    • Agree: JM, Old and Grumpy
    • Replies: @JM
  3. Derer says:

    As long as the backroom criminals in Washington, who send young boys to die in the ME on a pathetic lie, are not punished the USA is not a democracy. As long as the sinister elite is able deceive the public about the killing of a popular elected President or the 9/11 attack, the USA is not a democracy. The USA is absolutely not in a position to police others on corruption.

    • Agree: GomezAdddams
  4. Anonymous[366] • Disclaimer says:

    Dalton, like most “far-right” thinkers is only slightly right about the reasons behind the decline of the West. Yes, quasi-religious belief in equality is an ideological failing of Western societies, but that’s not why the West is going down.

    What’s killing the West is capitalism, the belief that greed and selfishness should be regarded as virtues instead of vices, prioritizing individual short-term interests to the detriment of collective long-term ones, and the vain attempt at maximizing consumption, comfort, individual rights and life expectancy.

    America started as an ideological mix between capitalism and Christianity, but in time capitalism won out and smothered Christianity. Now Christianity is a false belief system, but false as it is, it did a good job of tempering the excesses of capitalism. Now that Christianity is basically dead and waiting to be buried, the West will finally reap what it has sown. P.T. Anderson’s “There Will Be Blood” illustrated this well allegorically.

  5. The equality of man predates Aristotle by at least 1,600 years in written texts from Ancient Egypt. There is no contradiction in that AE was a hierarchical society centered on divine monarchy built on a foundation of Maat.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maat

    A harmonious society is one in which people of different talents work together for the common good. The person who is well gifted also has greater responsibilities for how those gifts are used and the nobility were insistent that they did their duty to the needy – their eternal life depended on it. It was dumb to think what a genius they were for that which was a gift.

    The Jewish money man Ivan Boesky was the inspiration for the “Greed is Good” mantra of unregulated capitalism towards the end of the 20th century. Jewish Bolshevism was a catastrophe visited on Russia and a synthesis of both now rules and is the ruin of the West.

    All this now seems just like going round in wordy circles. It would take divine intervention of the most spectacular kind to save it and there is no sign of that. Instead everything is gravitating into a cultural black hole. If you are spiritual then this glimpse of hell then surely helps clarify what are the options.

    • Agree: Abdul Alhazred, HdC
    • Replies: @Anon
    , @Erzberger
  6. anonymous[398] • Disclaimer says:

    Absolutely right. America must die. Fuck America.

    The reasoning, though, is too fixated on fusty canonical musings. You’ve lost touch with the modern civilized world and how it works. That’s why you used democracy in such a delusional sense.

    Do you know what a democratic society is? No so-called americans do, so we will tell you. In customary international law and therefore in US state and federal common law, a democratic society is in conformity with the UDHR. Look for 2 seconds and you’ll see obviously, the US is not a democracy. It’s a kleptocracy propped up by a police state. So democracy has nothing to do with the USA’s manifest state failure.

    And if you think America is too equal, prove it to us, go out and smoke crack till your teeth crumble, bone fat Ukie hookers and record it, lose a gun in a dumpster, make millions trading in influence for overt abuse of function, and see how that works out for ya. You will find you are not equal to brain-damaged meth zombie Hunter Biden.

    That Saint John’s canon shit is OK for a callow youth, but you got to mature and face the world as it is now. It’s like this.

    https://ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/UniversalHumanRightsInstruments.aspx

    You’ll find it’s a straightforward application of Kant’s categorical imperative. And it tells you exactly where your shithole regime went wrong.

    • Agree: CSFurious
    • Troll: Bro43rd
    • Replies: @Ann Nonny Mouse
  7. The article goes off the rails with the Huxley quotation. All men are endowed with certain unalienable rights. That is the extent of the equality asserted in the foundational documents of the U.S. Inspired by our equal status as mortal creatures under our Creator, and equally desirous of life, liberty, and pursuit of property, our Founders recognized our natural rights and provided for their protection. No other kind of equality is implied or intended.

  8. My following comments are based on my current understanding of Differential Psychology, Behavioral Genetics, Evolutionary Psychology, and History:

    This article suggests that European-Americans must choose to immediately do various things in order to create an Eurocentric nation. However, if the genetics the Europeans possessed during the Enlightenment was not sufficient to reject the seeds of the Enlightenment thoughts (Atheism, Multiculturalism, Individualism, Feminism, Homosexuality), then with the cumulative effects of the following 250 years of dysgenics and mutational load, the European-Americans are going to be even much more unlikely to carry out the actions advised by Mr. Dalton. If European-Americans had any genetic potential to do these things, then surely they would have done it decades ago at each Cultural Marxist milestone, such as the Civil War, the emancipation of the American Ashkenazim, granting voting rights to females, increasing foreign immigration, desegregation, civil rights/affirmative action, pornography, WWI and WWII, and so forth. Each of these milestones is an act of genocide, and in historical times during periods of strong Group Selection, such milestones would invoke civil war (current protesting, voting, not shopping at anti-European companies, etc. are acts of genetic cowardess).

    Also, the author talks about how Plato/Aristotle noticed the low Industriousness, low intelligence, low Altruism, and Neuroticism of the masses, masses that should not be allowed to vote. And the author argues that the nature of people today is the same, indicating that humans remain genetically the same over centuries/millennia. However, Dr. Woodley of Menie’s theory is that civilizations genetically rise and fall and they cycle between relatively Group Selected to relatively Individually Selected. Plato/Aristotle may have noticed the relative transition of the masses towards an Individually Selected state. Rome then had its group selected state, then transitioned to the opposite, resulting in its collapse. Then once again from 1400s to 1700s Europeans again became increasingly Group Selected, only to then reverse during the Industrial Revolution. Therefore, what we are experiencing now among current European-Americans is an extreme state of Individual Selection, one in which collapse has been postponed due to unprecedented amount of technology keeping all the genetic degenerates alive. Since rigorous Darwinian Selection is being postponed, mutated and dysgenic genes are accumulating more than ever before in European and human history to a point to which no recovery may even be possible. In other words, this time when Western nations collapse, they may just all go extinct. I wrote an “article” (if one can even call it that, as opposed to the ramblings of a mid-wit), where I describe this process among the Ashkenazim, but which can be extrapolated to Europeans, here is the link:
    https://www.unz.com/article/beyond-the-bell-curve-richard-lynns-race-differences-in-psychopathic-personality/#comment-3786343 (It’s no longer at Reddit since those forums were banned, but the whole ‘article’ is posted at Unz, you just have to click on the “[MORE]” link.
    At best though, we can just hope that once the West collapses, rigorous Darwinian Selection can re-mold a small surviving section of Europeans, re-fortifying them once again with Group Selected traits such as high intelligence, ethnocentrism, industriousness, emotional stability, and religiosity/spirituality/monumentalism/open-to-experience.

    Final thought: Mr. Dalton does not value religion, however, it may be a biological requirement for religion to be innately present for a race to choose to practice Group Selection/ethno-nationalism. Without a feeling of spirituality/immortality, the pure emotionless acceptance of the observable laws of physics would lead to a conclusion that there is no ‘purpose’ to life and we all just die anyway, so why bother to reproduce? Why continue the misery of human existence? With all the pain in the world, why not just commit suicide? This problem does not exist in Group Selected animals such as bees, ants, wolves, birds, and apes, who lack the general intelligence to actually ponder upon such thoughts as the meaning of life (and, perhaps Africans can’t do this either, which is why they don’t need religion to have high fertility). But for Europeans, just consider the extreme environmental tortures they had to endure, such as mass starvation, plagues, volcano eruptions, freezing mass deaths, foreign invaders wiping out extremely large amounts of the population, etc. What European would be motivated to struggle to survive when suicide would be much less painful? It would require religion to give them this motivation – put up with the pain now and do God’s bidding, and be rewarded in the After-Life, among other things. Religion takes that which is evolutionary adaptive, and makes it the Will of God.

    But just for the record, I am actually religiously Agnostic, however I gamble on the existence of God and thus behave as if He is watching me and judging me.

    One last thought: since most of European history has been monarchic, could this not be said to be the most stable form of government in evolutionary terms? Monarchy existed during the most Group Selected phases of European history, however, during the two times democracy emerged, they occurred when Europeans were transitioning back towards the Individual Selection phase and thus being concerned more with individual rights and and individual interests, as opposed to the collective well-being.

    • Thanks: Sarah, CelestiaQuesta
    • Replies: @Traddles
    , @anon
  9. All this babbling persiflage is all based on a stupid fallacy of incongruity, the overly broad kind.

    The Western idea of human “equality” means “equality before the law,” duh.

    Not “equality in waist sizes or penchant for basketball or ability to do double-entry bookkeeping” or any other type of equality. Just equality before the law.

    Nobody but idiots and people trying to pull the wool over other people’s eyes confuses A with B.

    • Agree: Carolyn Yeager
    • Replies: @The Anti-Gnostic
  10. TheBAG says:

    Regarding your prescription:

    At a more sophisticated level, we might move to adopt something like a Platonic education system, as laid out in the Republic. There he sketches a 50-year training program involving age-appropriate schooling, skills training, physical fitness, and practical experience that both educates the masses and serves as a filtering process to determine who the truly wisest and most capable leaders are.

    Isn’t that the way present Chinese leaders are developed and chosen?

    • Replies: @follyofwar
  11. @TheBAG

    Plus, according to the World Atlas, 91.59% are Han Chinese. The number of the citizens of the country (over a billion in China’s case) may not matter so much when there is homogeneity. Diversity is not our Strength, it is our Curse.

    The US will inevitably fall, probably sooner than later, but Dalton paints too rosy a picture. Endless war abroad is what the US knows. This time there will be war at home. In fact, it started in earnest last year, with the Covid lockdowns, morphing into the summer’s riots, followed by the stolen election. The death of George Floyd on Memorial Day was just a convenient excuse for the rioting and looting by Blacks and Antifa that went on for month’s, and are still ongoing.

    Now the US is ruled by a senile tyrant who hates his own ethnic group, and is determined to make Euro Americans a minority ASAP. Dalton’s trite proposal of sending blacks back to Africa is a pipe dream. Ain’t gonna happen. The most that Heritage America can strive for is to carve out a mostly homogenous new country (or countries) of like-minded individuals, with as little bloodshed as possible. Keep the borders well-fortified. Let the rest of the former USA sink or swim without us.

    • Agree: Realist
  12. If breaking up the United States of America stops Usonians from referring to their country as though it were all that is of interest and significance in two continents combined it will be no bad thing. There is an amusing account in The Old Patagonian Express of a conversation Paul Theroux had with a man on a train in South America. Theroux asked the man if he’d ever travelled by train in ‘America’. The man replied to the effect that he’d travelled widely by train and visited many places. Theroux then asked if he had ever visited places like New York, Washington, Chicago, and a long list of other US cities. To each enquiry the man answered no, he hadn’t visited that place. Eventually Theroux asked him, nonplussed, where he had been in America, to which the man replied with an equally long list of South American cities.

    That aside, I feel that for England to stand any chance of survival it is necessary for us to stop thinking of ourselves as ‘British’, which label now means absolutely nothing, and dissolve the ‘United’ Kingdom. The same applies, I believe, for white Usonians.

    • Replies: @Franz
    , @Ace
    , @Luus Kanin
  13. Time for Jews to ask the Jewish Question

    Dalton is a passionate though ultimately brainwashed leftist who misses entirely the problem with his progressivism and that of the elites who are forcing their progressive utopia upon the world. The Soviet Union was many things, progressive was not one of them, that was Nazi Germany. That Hitler’s Germany was the first large scale, aggressively progressive utopia attempted leads us naturally to the question of why are so many Jews, at least among the elite, supporting progressivism. It proved disastrous for the Germans and the Jews yet it is enjoying new found legitimacy and popularity today. I don’t know how to counter this. This is a short comment to hopefully inspire people to study what progressivism truly is and to fight it as best they can.

  14. @obwandiyag

    But we don’t even treat people the same under the law: insanity, mental retardation and tender years all get differential treatment from, say, Martha Stewart. Of course, as things get progressively more Progressive, “historically oppressed” will be considered in sentencing, and probably the substantive charge as well.

    The context for Jefferson’s statement is the hereditary aristocracy, so of course it’s a much narrower statement than it’s ballyhooed version but Progressives will never draw that line. “E Pluribus Unum” is another founding phrase that’s exploded from, “13 Crown colonies uniting to become their own country,” to, “Diversity is our strength.”

    Classical liberals are fighting a (losing) rearguard action. Nobody is going to listen to them pleading, “But that’s not what Jefferson really meant!”

    • Agree: TKK
    • Replies: @TKK
    , @Corvinus
  15. @follyofwar

    Now the US is ruled by a senile tyrant who hates his own ethnic group, and is determined to make Euro Americans a minority ASAP.

    Do you mean Stand-In President Biden? He doesn’t rule anything, even his own mouth. We have other rulers, including (((those chosen by God and, especially, themselves))).

    Dalton’s trite proposal of sending blacks back to Africa is a pipe dream. Ain’t gonna happen.

    What is “trite” about it? Do you know what the word means? “Diversity is our strength” … now, that’s trite.

    • Replies: @Petermx
  16. von Frey says:

    The title of this article should be, “The United States Must Die So That The American People Can Live”

    We are Americans. If the United States is dissolved into smaller more manageable pieces, we, the European peoples of this continent, will still be Americans, just as North Koreans and South Koreans are still Koreans, and East Germans and West Germans were still Germans, we will still be Americans.

    “The United States” is the name of the government. “America” and “American” refer exclusively to us as an ethnic group all over the world. Any Argentinian who uses “America” to refer to the continent is fooling himself. No city in South America (or Canada, for that matter) can be referred to in any meaningful way as “American”.

  17. It’s like the Jews, with their “israel” mistake. It’s not necessary for all the
    “israelis” to die, but they cannot live in Palestine. Similarly, it’s not necessary for all the
    USers to die, but they must not continue to murder in Asia. America must butt out of Asia, so that people can live.

  18. Biff says:
    @Dr. Robert Morgan

    Try and refute that it’s unbelievable.

  19. True, right, loyal;

    Truth is right.

    Right is loyal (ty to the true).

    One truth!
    True law (is right law).
    Left is never right; hence left is always wrong side of the law (the right).

    Nature is true.
    Nature is good (Goohhd).
    God is racist.

    Every loyal, rightously true man (not wo-man) must keep his voice at all times
    (and not give it up at neglections, not give it to a stranger for four and more years).

    (“Liberté” screws the loyal, the right, the true; “égalité” screws Goohhd; “fraternité” plays Goohhd).

  20. TKK says:
    @The Anti-Gnostic

    But we don’t even treat people the same under the law: insanity, mental retardation and tender years all get differential treatment from, say, Martha Stewart. Of course, as things get progressively more Progressive, “historically oppressed” will be considered in sentencing, and probably the substantive charge as well.

    Even four years ago, I could put a white young man in a suit, have his parents, employer and minister there for sentencing, and 99% of the time- keep him out of prison for serious law breaking.

    If I had the same charges with a black defendant, who refuses to take his corn rows out, and wore the suit around his hips that I bought for him at Wal Mart, and had no family to show, and who mumbled and made no eye contact with the Judge, prison was going to be on the menu, unless I could do a passionate dog and pony show.

    Now, BLM lunacy and demonic influence is seeping into sentencing. In some judges, usually female or liberal men, I see a hard set to their jaw and eyes if my client is a clear MAGA rural white male. I see contempt. I see punitive sentencing.

    With the sacred blacks, they are bending over backwards to appear magnanimous, even preferential, in sentencing. Right now, it is critically important where you live. Local is life. The sheriff where you live decides if BLM can burn down your house while his deputies play Candy Crush.

    The kill shot of “democrazy” in this country is POLITICALLY MOTIVATED CRIMINAL PROSECUTIONS. There is no stronger indicia of a banana republic.

    Who you voted for determines if you are imprisoned or free, hated or revered.

    It is terrifying.

    • Thanks: The Anti-Gnostic
  21. ghali says:

    Many people (billions) would be happy to see America dies a painful death. It is a criminal enterprise that have committed unspeakable and horrendous crimes against people all over the world. I can’t wait fo that beautiful day and say good riddance.

    • Replies: @Badger Down
  22. Curle says:

    “ We in the US have our treasured Declaration of Independence, which declares as “self-evident”—with the calm assurance of those who know they cannot be contradicted—that “all men are created equal.” As we know, this was disingenuous at best.”

    The Declaration was a press release. Necessary to justify to European states the secession from the Crown. The reference to equality was an Lockean rejection of the divine right of Kings. And in keeping with that theme, the rest of the document was a record of King George’s alleged misdeeds. The whole thing has a unity of purpose and a single subject, that being King George. This modern practice of treating it as an philosophical treatise on equality is utter nonsense.

    • Agree: John Regan
  23. Miro23 says:

    Industrial Democracy

    What, then, of democracy in the world today? We have variations on the democratic theme that are so remote from the Athenian original that they hardly deserve the same name. They have lost all the virtues of the original but retained all the vices. Democracy today has devolved into a crude perversion that I like to call industrial democracy. Its primary characteristics are these:

    1) Representative (parliamentarian) system—no direct participation.
    2) Universal suffrage—all adults can vote.
    3) Multiracial—all races can vote.
    4) Unlimited population size.
    5) Financially corrupt—moneyed interests (especially Jewish) hold great sway.

    On every point, this is opposed to the Athenian model.

    Excellent article showing how Western “Industrial Democracy” channels power into the hands of a Jewish activist elite (the real power holders).

    • Replies: @Anonymike
  24. @follyofwar

    91.59% are Han Chinese. The number of the citizens of the country (over a billion in China’s case) may not matter so much when there is homogeneity

    One needs to understand the context of this “homogeneity”.

    The Han Chinese identify as Han Ren or “people of Han” because the were proud of being part of the Han polity. The Han Dynasty was one of the greatest of the Chinese dynasties and was the rough contemporary of Imperial Rome and roughly the same size. It too was composed of many peoples with their own languages and cultures.

    While the Roman empire fell, the Chinese polity did not. If the Roman empire had survived till today, people would not be calling themselves French, or Spanish, or English. They would all be calling themselves Roman.

    So it is with the Han. Over 2000 years of unity have caused some blending of culture and language. But the fact is that the different Han “dialects” are still as different as French from Italian. They are only called “dialects” and not distinct languages because the government has a policy of fostering unity amongst the peoples.

    So…..if the USA does manage to hold together for another 2000 years, perhaps the peoples would not be thinking of themselves as white or black or hispanic etc. They would just be American.

    If it holds together.

  25. This is justice under Jewish Supremacist rule.

    But Trump tells us that it’s great that Congress is controlled by Jews, the very people who bitchslapped him out of office. So much for America First. More like Americuck First.

    • Replies: @William Gruff
  26. @Anonymous

    Yeah, that life expectancy. Real evil stuff.

  27. Pamela says:

    It doesn’t matter whether you have a democracy or not. Neither does it matter whether you think you are equal or not. They are the wrong attributes to consider. It’s like trying to understand what is wrong with your cake by examining the icing.
    What matters is one thing. Are you a civilisation? Ignore the Marxist guru in this field V. Child and consider deeply the personal characteristics and thus ruling paradigm of a civilisation and you will see that you do not have a civilisation nor are 90% of you civilised. Like most of mankind now you are a group of tribes of savages. A savage is one who gives reign to emotions and totally selfish indulgence over rational balanced tbought: thus savages have no ruling paradigm of the practice of integrity, self discipline, compassion for others and practice af rational common sense. So you see you are savages who developed a talent for advanced technology then fooled yourselves into thinging this made you civilised. It doesn’t I’m afraid.

  28. anon[307] • Disclaimer says:

    i can always count on thomas dalton to get things exactly backwards.

    At the highest level, my inspection report finds two major, and related, areas of concern: (1) a false notion of human equality, and (2) misplaced faith in the doctrine of democracy.

    1. the US has never even been an approximation to a democracy. it is less democratic today than it was 90 years ago.

    2. the people with power in the US don’t actually believe in idpol. they’re psychopaths who use it to distract from economic inequality. the msm are their organs.

    3. the solutions to america’s problems is democracy and more equality. it has ever been thus.

    is thomas dalton a high school graduate?

    sad.

    • Disagree: Bro43rd
  29. C’mon Teddy Boy, tell us about the cabal that controls Biden. Otherwise, shut up.



    Video Link

  30. Blacks, Asians, Hispanics, and Jews all have countries of origin; they need to return there with all due haste. After a short period of voluntary compliance, increasing pressure will need to be applied until they comply. Yes, Whites could theoretically return to Europe, except that Whites created and built up the present civilization (such as it is) of the USA, and thus have earned a right to stay and to evict the interloper

    In other words, everybody else is the interloper except me? LOL

    If this argument were valid, then the Jewish settlers “developing” the occupied Palestinian territories would be entitled to stay.

    What about China “creating and building” islands in the SCS? Perhaps they add this to their basis of their claims.

    Native Americans were of course here before the White Europeans, and that precedence needs to be respected, such as via truly autonomous homelands.

    So you agree to the idea of precedence. This is why you have more claim than the Asian and Indian?

    If this is true, then the Spanish have more claim than you do. Why should Anglos claim the Spanish discovery of the Americas as part of a White discovery, then later boot the Spanish from their claims in the USA. I am sure they will be pleased to get Florida back.

    I have not even mentioned the Mexicans and Hawaiians.

    And if you admit that the Native Americans have precedence, then why are they relegated to “homelands”? No doubt these are the least rich parts of the lands? They own the whole continent! Why should they be confined to “reservations”?

    The beginning of your article was good with many points I could agree on. Sadly the conclusions showed the lack of strength to recognise what is right. You appear to use flimsy argument to justify holding onto ill gotten lands.

    America once inspired the world. But the world has opened their eyes in the recent years to American hypocrisy and moral failings.

    You have used a 200 year house as your analogy. We would have been much more impressed if Americans expressed candour and admitted their deep problems and aimed to repair and strengthen the house, instead of just papering over rotten and mouldy structure of the house and claiming “oh it was just a local defect, once we get rid of this little Chinese water stain here, and that African chip in the plaster over there, everything will be perfect”.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  31. Dumbo says:

    Not a good article. A digression on an obscure quote by Huxley that isn’t even a great insight.

    “Equal” can mean many things. Some ideas of equality are good and coherent (such as equality under the law, or equality as part of the same human species), others (that men and women are equal, that all races or peoples are equal), not so much.

    Even the idea that “all are equal under the eyes of God” is also a fallacy, since according to the doctrine some (a few) are going to Heaven and some (a lot) to Hell. So Christianity is not about equality at all.

    But he’s right that America needs to be destroyed and rebuilt.

    • Replies: @G J T
  32. Anon[159] • Disclaimer says:

    All problems have their source in the Jews.

    All of them.

    No exceptions.

    Prove me wrong.

    • Replies: @Mr Anatta
    , @G J T
  33. Anonymous[744] • Disclaimer says:

    The death of the Republic does seem to be at hand. Obviously party democracy is dictatorial essentially as you state. The controllers of the parties select the candidates so the choice among candidates is seriously restricted. In fact it would be far better to say the US is an oligarchy run by some rather maleficent oligarchs. Not a democracy at all.

    Thus modern America is not a model of democratic illegitimacy but of aristocratic illegitimacy. What remains of democracy consists only of superficial forms. The worst aspects of modern America have been implemented under the oligarchy.

    I have thought that one of the great failings of the Founders in the Constitution was the failure to discuss the nature of the electorate and what it should be. In short there should have been a recognized fourth branch of government to go along with the Legislative, Administrative, and Judicial branches. Call it the Electoral Branch in which the Constitution would have defined who the electorate would be, how candidates for office would be selected, and how elections would be conducted both to select office holders and remove them. The goal is to select worthy people in an effective manner with as little special pleading by advocates and elites as possible.

    The race issue which you bring up is as pernicious as it has always been throughout history whether used in behalf of whites or against them. I suggest all the race based social legislation be repealed or eliminated. What is needed are office holders that truly act with the interests of the polity in mind, a way to find and empower them, and ensure the integrity of the electoral mechanism. Perhaps the Athenian mechanism needs consideration. Certainly all men are not created equal but doing more than is necessary to deal with the fact would be unwise.

    The rest is dross. We are not going back to the 18th century. If anything we are headed into the universal civilization phase of Spengler’s historical theory. This argues that world empire or civilization wide empire will have only local semi-autonomous governments. Therefore effective functioning democratic governments will help make the situation palatable. This would presumably mean the efficient removal and even execution of those found execrable whatever their personal background.

    • Replies: @Old and Grumpy
  34. Petermx says:
    @Etruscan Film Star

    I never knew I would someday be speaking out in defense of “Whites” and the USA. 50 or 60 years ago when someone spoke of an American, that was synonymous with being White. They were the overwhelming majority and with Jews, they held all the power in the USA. Whites founded and made the USA into a great power and they still had considerable power, the Jews being the other group with power.

    Today, even though Whites are still a majority in the USA, the USA is an openly hateful, racist, anti-White country. The media plays the biggest role in this and Jewish ownership of much of the media, no doubt, is why so much of the media is openly racist towards Whites. As groups, Blacks and Jews have a grudge against Whites. Jews commemorate and regurgitate every battle or struggle with every enemy in their history, even thousands of years later. What other group does this and takes it to heart so strongly? And Jews have helped inculcate Blacks with a hatred of Whites, more resentment than they already had.

    Right now, it appears Whites are divided against each other, with White liberals spreading as much hatred against Whites as any other group, but if things continue on this path, with the hatred increasing every year, I could see enough Whites uniting to declare a state or states to be independent of the USA and to be a country for Whites.

    The Rittenhouse case is a prime example of pure, unadulterated hatred for Whites. The Blacks, from basketball star LeBron James to a long list of Black media commentators want Rittenhouse to be convicted and suffer because they have been convinced by media propaganda that innocent Blacks are constantly convicted and mistreated by the USA and have been for their entire history. In fact, Black criminality and extreme violence far, far exceeds that of any other group. And some Blacks have this bizarre idea that they made the USA into a great country. Whites overlooked things while Blacks did all the work. They actually say this on nationwide television and no White dares point out how retarded such a statement is. That’s power. But there may come a point where Whites have had enough.

    • Agree: Montefrío
    • Replies: @Carolyn Yeager
  35. Ace says:
    @Anonymous

    You are in the grip of your “short-term” interests, namely, food, shelter, heat, transportation, sanitation, clothings and medical care. These “capitalism” supplies efficiently with the aid of souless, money grabbing toads who are in fact providing a foundation for any life worth living. 366 would weep inconsolably we’re his short-term interest in such pedestrian things denied and he would not give a dog for any “collective” interests.

    • Agree: Bro43rd
    • Replies: @Ace
  36. One of the better articles I have read.

  37. Franz says:
    @William Gruff

    The US was never supposed to be our nom much less the name of the nation.

    The Articles were specific: We were a confederacy of Vermonters, Virginians, Pennsylvanians and so on.

    The criminals who fashioned the Constitution were looking for a More Perfect Union and the confusion began then. That, plus old fashioned incompetence. For a period of time following the ratification, names were considered. Columbia was one and someone mentioned Utopia as another. But after no agreement the matter was forgotten.

    As of now, whether we call ourselves Americans, British, Canadians matters little. The USA is on a course to break down. Done wisely. real countries will arise. Done badly, it’ll be Mad Max time and our name will be the least of it.

  38. Ace says:
    @William Gruff

    The man on the train was confused or obtuse. He’d only traveled by train in S. America.

    Venezuela is a country in S. America. America is in N. America. If you are in Angola, Bhutan, or Bosnia and refer to “America” absolutely everyone on the planet knows to which country you is referring to.

    • Agree: TTSSYF, von Frey
  39. sb says:

    I’m not so sure that Australia has a relatively large Jewish population .

    It’s certainly a wealthy community – maybe seven or eight of the wealthiest ten people in the country are Jewish – and maybe a third of the wealthiest 200 are – but there are only about 100,000 Jews in Australia ( say 0.4% of the population )

    The deputy leader of the governing party is Jewish and maybe there are 4 or 5 in the national Parliament of 227. One judge of seven on the country’s highest court is Jewish but he is the first since WWII

    I’d say that there are plenty of people who have never met a Jew especially those from outside Melbourne and Sydney and I’m not sure I would have myself if I hadn’t done certain courses at certain universities which lead to certain employment etc .

    I have noted that Jews with a central casting look generally turn heads in the street outside their Jewish neighbourhoods . They aren’t a common sight

    The Australian Jewish lobby certainly has the ear of both major parties who when told to jump just ask how high . It’s pretty well acknowledged that their loyalty is to Israel but some gentiles are apparently quite OK with this

    • Replies: @Abbybwood
  40. JM says:
    @Anon from NC

    This state of affairs arises as much from changes in the economic structure of the US and world economy as from the political set-up. These changes, running in parallel with the application of revolutionary technologies to “production”, including in its perverted modern manifestations, are essential to the concentration of power need to bring about the servitude to it at the social and political level.

    For what it’s worth, I recently encountered the suggestion of the existence of an historical analogy between the “servitude” that followed the “Covid Crisis and in the “Great War”, when, starting as an adventure which would, provided the right measures were taken” would “soon be over” to a realization that service on the Front was a likely death sentence. The latter ended in national ruin, revolution and in some nations…hyper-inflation! The present events are yet to run their full course.

  41. onebornfree says: • Website

    “America Must Die—So That the People Can Live”

    Yes, the American federal government must die, and the sooner the better.

    Either:

    1) Get rid of it entirely and replace it with _nothing_ …….

    2) Or, at the very least, shrink it back down to its original, strictly limited, constitutional functions , whereby it would be roughly 5% of its present size.

    Then, the American people will be free to live once more.

    “Government is a disease masquerading as its own cure” Robert LeFevere

    Regards, onebornfree

    • Agree: BAP
  42. PJ London says:

    The answer has been known for 60 years.
    It is Apartheid!
    People collect in their own culture, their own ethical and moral climate, their own laws.
    A system of Cantons with freedom to move from one to another as long as you abide by the mores and norms of the one you choose.
    The only punishment in any Canton is expulsion, banishment for ever.
    There was never any problem with blacks living in a white south Africa, as long as they kept to the norms of the whites. (millions did)
    There was no problem with whites living in the homelands as long as they accepted the culture of the blacks.
    The author equates culture with race or ethnicity or religion this is clearly not true.
    I don’t care what race or religion you are as long as you share my culture and do not want to enforce your culture on me.
    If all the counties of USA were autonomous with only defence being shared then it would be simple to have a thousand different choices. Defence (against the British imposition of laws and taxes) was the only reason that the states united in the first place.
    You will get some counties with corrupt Sheriffs and Judges. It is their problem let them sort it out. If you live in such a county and can’t, or can’t be bothered, to fix it, then move to the next.
    This was the basic organisation that made USA great.
    I have met many Jews who share my core beliefs, and I have had fair and honest dealings with them. I have met many others.
    Because of my experiences I will not have any dealings with Israelis or any who espouse Zionism. I reject any coercion on this or any other position I choose to take.
    If your County wants to close the border and kick people out, that’s fine.
    If another County wants to welcome unlimited immigration fine, as long as they do not impinge or invade another County
    The USA is large enough for both Galt’s Gulch and Chicago.
    Which one to stay in should be a matter of choice.
    PS The Counties which support the current 2nd amendment and form true Militias will like the Spartans, last 600 years.

  43. miha says:

    ‘Proper Studies’ by Aldous Huxley. You can download a free copy (pdf etc.) from
    https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.51554

    • Thanks: Sarah
  44. Mr Anatta says:
    @Dr. Robert Morgan

    Jesus was probably a master of spirit from his essene psychadelic drug cult days and a master of spirit is taught that ‘there is no separation in this dream world’ where physicality is merely a vibration or a hologram that seems very real but isn’t in any way and physicality is no more real than Lara Croft in her adventures in Play Station and so ‘all is one’ or rather more precisely, ‘all is none’.

    Those that don’t treat others equally in the dream are very lost and may have to go through hundreds, if not thousands of lifetimes before they even get the chance to understand the meaning of life and experience God as nothingness outside of duality.

  45. Mr Anatta says:
    @Anon

    ‘Prove me wrong’.

    The rape of Nangking.

    That is unless you believe all Japanese are Jewish.

    • LOL: littlereddot
    • Replies: @Anon
  46. Mevashir says: • Website

    Yes, it was nominally a “Christian nation” at the start, but few among the Founders were deeply religious—Patrick Henry, Samuel Adams, and John Jay being the exceptions—and most were skeptical believers or deists, if not functional atheists.

    Thank you for clarifying this. My impression is that all men are created equal is an argument for Meritocracy vs. Aristocracy, that self-made successful white American males are equal (and in fact superior) to white male British aristocrats who inherited their wealth through luck rather than talent.

    I think your plan is idealistic but impractical. In a multi-ethnic multi-racial society such as America today, there is no organizing principle apart from money. In fact if we are honest we will admit that from its very inception America was a plantation, with a wealthy owner class overseeing hoards of low-class menial laborers. And truly this is America today: a gigantic plantation with a small financial and managerial owner class supervising a vast horde of menial laborers, most of whom want for the most basic amenities of life, including meaning value and virtue, hence:

    WANT = Whites Are Niggers Too

    Since you write that aristocracy is preferable to democracy, it’s surprising that you avoid the question of the legitimacy of the original Revolution. Perhaps we would have been better off staying within the British Empire. America was founded by a group of violent rebellious men against the very forces that legally and financially had bankrolled their colonial enterprise. You avoid discussing any of this.

    Also the elephant in the room you avoid discussing is that no one ever surrenders power willingly, and those who hold power today in America are so overwhelmingly predominant that it’s inconceivable that they would willingly lay it down for the betterment of the less powerful.

    Secession also is not possible, because the military-industrial state has carefully scattered its resources to add every region of the country so that all regions are dependent on the federal teat. Likewise the dependency on federal welfare and transfer payments.

    What you are really hoping for is a total Messianic transformation of the present system, but because religion does not factor into your calculus this too is foreclosed to you.

    I think the cruel reality is that America is very close to the Athenian democracy you’ve described whereby only 10% of the population are voting citizens. This is the reality here. Noam Chomsky cites studies showing that the American political system completely ignores the lower 70% of the population on the income scale and caters only to the wealthy.

    So in America today perhaps 10% of the population have the practical rights of citizenship and maybe 1% exercise true influence. This is precisely the Athenian model you’ve described. The problem is that the elite ruling class are almost all Jews and you as an excluded person are resentful of your slave situation. I imagine in ancient Athens there was much resentment. I have read that many of the tutors and teachers were actually slaves. So we can presume that some of the most educated and intelligent people were disenfranchised from the Athenian political system. And that might well describe Mr Dalton and many other people here: highly educated intelligent and articulate people who are excluded from the rights of citizenship and suffer under the ignominy of slavery.

    Maybe this is karmic retribution and you were a Solon or a Pericles in a previous lifetime?

    So dream of Hitler and a mythical pure Aryan race as you enjoy your degraded slave status!

    • Replies: @Ford
    , @anon
  47. Anon[159] • Disclaimer says:
    @Mr Anatta

    If that’s the best you got, I stand correct.

    That was an event… not a problem.

    • Replies: @Mr Anatta
  48. gotmituns says:

    America Must Die
    ——————————–
    It’s my guess, America died about the time of WW2. From then on we’ve been an empire. Just like Augutus Caesar during the time of Rome, we kept all the trapping of a republic in place but they never had any real power anymore. It has been rule by jews ever since then. But now that people in general have been made so stupid, they need not even go through the motions of staying within the bounds of constitutional law any longer.

  49. Having actually read Dalton’s piece, I honestly found his diagnosis and prognosis essentially sound, but his description of the ultimate causes (as opposed to symptoms) flawed. Also, I found the description of the cure almost worse than the disease itself (a race/color based aristocratic ethno-state based on an Athenian model). I was also deeply disappointed in how he seems place so much emphasis on collective and cohesive ‘white’ identity as the both the reason and cure for all of America’s countries ails while blaming, inexplicably, Christianity for all that is wrong with America while at the same time blaming Jews. Its obviously non-sensical. Also I am not sure whether Dalton mistakenly or intentionally misleads his readers with his description of ‘equality’ as the source of the problem and big mistake. Is it just me, or did he attempt to conflate all of mankind being equally born with the God given right and capacity to reason, liberty (due process), life, and right to pursue happiness with being equally endowed with various biological and/or inherited traits?

    [MORE]
    The point of equality in legal and constitutional sense is completely different from biological equality obviously, but he seems to suggest that because people may be different biologically, this implies some moral and spiritual inequality and thus entitles one group to rule over the other accordingly (e.g. ‘racialism/color-ism’). Essentially, this logically fallacy involves attributing metaphysical differences to biological differences and conveniently using this mismatch to create a system of racial or ethnic aristocracy. Does this sound a bit familiar? Like the pot calling the kettle black. Yet he complains about unbridled, unaccountable Jewish power (in America) which is based on the essential premise? Isn’t that what is it is all about? The ‘chosen ness’, the obsession with I.Q. This appears to be the same ‘racial’ and ethno-supremacist thinking that got Anglo- Americans into the place it is currently in? It started with the subversion of Catholic England into a Protestant sinkhole of unbridled Q finance capitalism, which endorsed chattel slavery and ethnic cleansing, something Jews incidentally promote in the Old Testament against non-Jews based on the curse of Ham (the ‘blacks’) and the mythical story of stealing Esau’s inheritance and destruction of Edom (‘whites’, Europeans, and ‘Christianity’) No coincidence there? Yet, in the same breath, Dalton is calling for the exact same solution, based on the Athenian model? Other scholars like Dr. E. Michael Jones (EMJ) have clearly described how the Greeks, for all their accomplishments, ultimately collapsed because of these flaws in their capacity to truly understand Logos (practical reason, morality, and order), which required the advent of Christianity and the universality and brotherhood mankind as a principle. It was this concept that ultimately gave birth to a mostly unified Christian Europe, despite all the flaws and contradictions in practice. Also, I was deeply disappointed he did not mention EMJ once as one of the most fervent critics of unaccountable and corrupting Jewish power elites, yet mentioned all his ‘white nationalist’, National Socialist colleagues. It seems like Dalton was to have white version of Jewish supremacy, so he condems Christianity, rejects the essential accomplishment of Greek and Athenian civilization (LOGOS-Reason) and calls for the very thing which ultimately brought down these great civilizations (ethno-centric, morally repugnant and exploitative aristocracies masked as rule by the betters among us). Moreover, America already has this now. When you look at what Dalton is suggesting, it is essentially the Shabbat Goy version of the Secular Israel (with ethnic cleansing, oligarchy and militarism for ‘whites’). This is no different that Nazism (National Socialism) and Fascism, which despite some of its economic accomplishments, it was wedded to a hyper-racialised form of nationalism which so alienated and freightened its neighbors that it was forced by necessity to bind with an even worse ideology, which continues to this day. Yet despite this, I agree with Dalton that for the above reasons, America is primed for break up as the peoples are divided by all these pathologies of the mind and soul. My hope is for some form of genuine Christian or Catholic awakening (for the European majority especially which seems have been completely Judaised (paganised and anti-Christian in both morality and economic principles). Despite having a growing presence due to immigration and birth rates, I do not see the Muslims (or any other groups) being large enough in number or influence to have a positive impact at this stage. Moreover, many Muslims obviously have there own problems and would need to partner with Christians (agreeing on similar moral framework), in combatting Jewish subversion.

    On another point, Dalton also seems to suggest that it was Europeans that ‘built’ America ‘in spite’ of Blacks and ‘Jews’. Also, he suggests that ‘Blacks’ mostly arrived from Africa and we should return to our homeland. Maybe he is just saying this out of ignorance or obfuscation? Obviously, ‘blacks’ to the extent they were actually brought here as ‘slaves’ to begin with, were not brought simply to watch European immigrants build the country. This is preposterous. Black and Jews, as well as many Asians played a significant part in the building of America which cannot be dismissed simply because we may find some of their behavior, influence and politics displeasing and destructive. Again, its not a racial thing, but its more religious and ethnic conflict when you look beyond the veil of color and identity politics. We are dealing with a difference in values and cultural subversion, not mere biological determinants. The Europeans Protestants and Catholics played a major part of building America, with significant and material contributions from ‘blacks’ and Jews, which continues to this day. However, despite this obvious fact Dalton seems to think we can wave a magic wand and simply go back to a ‘white’ ethno state. It’s a pleasant fantasy. Much like the Nation of Islam black supremacist idea of a carved out black ethnos state. No one has apparently informed Dalton, who seem very well read, thoughtful and articulate, that only 6% of the Africans slaves arrived in America, the rest were already here before the Europeans arrived, as either as Moors, African traders and explorers, indigenous ‘black’ tribes that mixed with the Mongoloid types which were also pre-existent. There many articles and books this subject from both the past and present which document this. They were subsequently enslaved and reclassified. Moreover, there were many European settlers from Scandinavia and Levantines from ancient Phoenicia that came before the other Europeans. So it’s not a question of ‘going back to Africa, or Europe. These so called ‘whites’, ‘blacks, are no longer ‘Africans’ and ‘Europeans’. They neither speak their ‘original’ language, share the original culture nor are even capable of doing so. Europeans and Africans, truth be told, do not want us bringing our problems to their countries.. What remains, if at all, is religion. This is the point of migration and geography, after several generations, it changes your identity. There is no ‘going back’. These people are Americans, which is why so much effort has gone into subversion of their national ethnic identity and religious values. For some reason this escapes the ‘racialists’ and ‘biological determinists’. If you look at Russia, the reason they have somewhat recovered from the effects of Communism and Neo-liberalism, is due to the re-embrace of their national, ethnic-religious identity. Obviousy, the battle will be among the various groups to learn to live together or die separately in conflict. There is no other choice. Moreover, the Latinos, or Mestizos, have a much better chance at ‘staying’ given their overwhelming numbers and birth rates. Protestants (‘whites’) by their hatred of large families and worship of less savory aspects of liberal Jewish culture (e.g. abortion, usury, sodomy, population control, while pretending they hate it), will only accelerate their demise UNLESS they return to some form of UNIVERSALISM (e.g. Catholic teaching). In essence , they have learn to live and not feel obliged to wage war on and dominate the rest of humanity in order to justify their existence. Then they can bind together as ethnic groups and defend this proposition with justification.

    • Thanks: littlereddot
  50. G J T says:

    It has become increasingly clear to me over last couple years that world Jewry has no interest in the survival of the American ZOG system long-term. What we’re witnessing is not the natural decline of a decadent empire, or hopelessly delusional “leaders” bungling and fumbling their way to disaster. Rather, what we’re seeing in America is a controlled demolition by the Jewish overlords who captured complete and unchallenged rule after WWII. America will indeed die, because they want it to.

    The only question is how audacious they are in accelerating this process, and whether they can drag it out long enough to replace white Europeans as the majority population. To thoroughly crush and stamp out the last vestiges of legacy America they will have to act in a more measured and restrained way than they are right now, because as it stands we are headed off the cliff faster than most people realize, and there are still 150+ white Americans left. More than enough of us to rebuild something better in its place.

    The death of America is indeed inevitable, and as whites (and Christians) we should be rooting for it to happen as soon as possible, rather than being killed off slowly while our percentage of the population shrinks to levels that will prevent us from building and sustaining what comes next. Do the Jews possess the self-restraint to keep this thing on the rails long enough for that to happen? I suspect they do not, and that is the whitepill that keeps me optimistic.

  51. G J T says:
    @Anon

    Haven’t posted here in a while so I lose my ‘agree’ privileges.

    You’re 100% correct, as it’s always been.

    The problem, of course, is even if we were blessed enough to rid ourselves of these kike-demons, it would take a couple generations at least to restore our nations and our race to its natural state. Our people have been so mindfucked by these Jews that they are now doing most of the work for them.

    Take women, for example. How do you reverse what the Jews have done with women’s “liberation” and everything that comes with it? I’m afraid nothing short of “white sharia”-type measures will ever bring them back. The damage the Christ-killers have inflicted is so extensive that in many ways it’s irreparable.

  52. reading says:

    Because the U.S. government is not only the U.S. government. It is also the world government. So he has to put on a left and diversified face. Otherwise, how can he manipulate the world and obtain benefits?

    The British Empire has to promote a group of Indian parliamentarians. If even a group of elites such as chiefs and tribal leaders of various countries are unwilling to buy. They don’t give verbal promises. It’s too naked. Who will play with you? No benefits. Only sticks. Isn’t that an instant return to the slave planet? Can the United States turn the world into a slave planet?

    So you don’t want the colorful diversity above. Do you want the throne of the earth monarch of the United States? What about the implicit and explicit welfare and competitive advantages of American citizens?

    As the world government, the United States can control the world, rule 10 billion and enjoy global support

    It’s a real Protoss

    In the face of such interests, what is your pain in the eyes of the upper elite?

    It is said that there is a pair of sister goddesses in Indian mythology. Her sister is very beautiful. Her sister is as ugly as a devil. But if you want to marry your sister, you must accept your sister

    There are two ways to resist. One is the Jewish way. Israel, who fights with God, becomes the devil and climbs up by all means

    The other is the way of the God of war Questo. Launch the gods to kill the protoss at dusk… For the last judgment

  53. G J T says:
    @Dumbo

    So Christianity is not about equality at all

    You’re certainly correct about that. A crucial element to the Jews destroying America was convincing white Americans otherwise.

  54. Mr Anatta says:
    @Anon

    A problematic event then but regardless, to say that it is only Jews that are capable of hate/evil/selfishness/greed etc that are obviously some of the main causes of problems ,is ridiculous and if it were true then the general crime rate in Israel would be far far higher than any other country and it isnt is it.?

    We have to be careful when we point the finger because there are always three pointing back at us.

    • Agree: littlereddot
    • Replies: @littlereddot
  55. Anon[192] • Disclaimer says:

    No Mr Dalton , your solution is wrong and it will destroy what is left of the white middle class . It will destroy the white Christianity, white culture , and sense of Europeans history .
    It will destroy because your findings are selective and exclusive , your solution is tyrannical ,and self- appeasing that tries to steal and aggrandize and misappropriate because the self can’t compete or succeed in the meritocracy.
    Come to Chicago or Indianapolis or Kansas or North Carolina or New England . You will white stupid moron racist doctors reigning and occupying positions that they do not deserve in hospitals like Loyola or Rush or Duke . You see professors at Yale or Harvard or Carnegie Mellon or Pittsburg or university of Michigan who are incompetent but rise because of white ethnicity . In the meme of diversity , minorities are asked to compete against each other and leave the white entitlements intact and enduring ,
    Interview is the place where discrimination plays the most devastating role ,
    The racism is infinitely worse among the retarded . These white join police and fire forces and enjoy city halls’s contracts or federal contracts . They also end up working for Walmart or Amazon where they vent the racism on now white coworkers because they could not make it in the corrupt bloated inefficient police force or fire department that offer pension and laziness .
    In suburban school and private colleges , they bring drugs , drinks and partying .

    Your claim that white built the past of last 200 hundreds years of America is addressed and presented in a wrong frame . It’s an incomplete and partial accounting . The fuller picture will undercut your exclusive white centric projection on the map of the beneficiaries of the history that has shaped the events of last 200 or 500 years.

    Your solution of deportation will apply to the white from the non-white perspective .It will even use most of your arguments that you marshal and harness to present your case .
    Good luck though ! White supremacy is preparing for massive dislocation that will put them where they were between the collapse of Rome and the settlement of Jamestown .

    American future is future of post -Roman Europe with no hope of Renaissance .

  56. Dr. X says:

    Dr. Dalton’s analysis is correct in many ways. However, his proposed solution to the problem is not nearly as simple as he makes it sound. I have three criticisms:

    First, book VIII of Plato’s Republic tells us that democracy is the fourth worst in his schema of five types of regimes, and it is invariably superseded by the worst regime, tyranny. The tyrant appears as a figure who is a “man of the people” and gains absolute power by offering to flatter the will of the people, and to mend the chaos created by the democracy.

    This is surely going to happen in the United States (if it is not happening already) long before any kind of break-up or white secession movement appears.

    Second, though Dr. Dalton cites many learned philosophers, he does not cite Karl Marx. I am not an advocate of Marxism by any means, but the fact is that “mass democracy” is actually a form of communism, and it is made possible by the fact that in the post-industrial world the democratic masses can and do demand a share of bourgeois wealth in exchange for their votes.

    Mass democracy as we know it is in fact a product of the Industrial Revolution and a product of bourgeois capital. While I disagree with Marx’s belief that the democratic/communist future will be a human paradise (it will almost certainly become a dystopia instead) the fact remains that we cannot do away with mass democracy and all its attendant ills without doing away with the industry and the capital that make democracy possible, as well.

    Third, Dr. Dalton’s belief that whites can and will unite against blacks and Jews is much too simplistic. In the U.S., blacks are about 13% of the population while Jews are about 2%. If the other 85% united against this 15%, we would not be having this discussion. But of course the blacks and Jews are only successful in undermining traditional America because they have a very large number of white allies who regard white racial solidarity as the sum of all evils.

    The fact remains that if whites united by geography and by loyalty to their state governments and to their state militias, willing and able to wage open war for four years, were unable to create a premodern, pre-industrial southern Confederacy against their fellow Northern, “progressive” whites in the 19th century, the probability of a white secession movement and a white geographic homeland in the 21st century is even more remote.

    Unfortunately I think the entire house will have to collapse and completely destroy itself before anything can be rebuilt upon the ruins.

    • Agree: Thor Walhovd
    • Replies: @Mr Anatta
  57. tomo says:

    the crack on this flag reminds me of numerous big cracks on that monument in Berlin (to do with Jews who died in WW2) – an ugly field of gray, megalomaniac looking concrete cubes next to Branderbug Gate/ JUSSA Embassy.
    Last time I saw them about 5 years ago – many cubes were full of expanding cracks – just like the USA flag above.

  58. We’ve heard this argument before. In 1861 it turned out to be the world heavyweight champion of really, seriously, catastrophically bad ideas.

    The issue of “equality” is a matter of semantics. No two things in nature are equal, but all human beings are of equivalent value. Some people, unfortunately, in fact more than a few, are just assholes. There is no reliable way of identifying such individuals except by interacting with them, one at a time. Such people are the termites, eating away the timbers in that old house metaphor, and they, whether ghetto thugs, police officers or corporate CEOs, forfeit their claim to the ordinary protection of civil government. I would put politicians at the head of that list, because well-adjusted people do not seek to control or exploit others. Lord Acton famously said that absolute power corrupts absolutely, but he did not grasp that seeking power over others is inherently corrupt. The founders figured this out, and their plan worked for a time, but when their government came to be run by men who did not live by an Anglo-American gentleman’s code of honor, the system became a mockery of itself.

    • Replies: @HdC
  59. Man was created by God to love and worship…God.

    • Replies: @Mr Anatta
    , @von Frey
  60. Traddles says:
    @Mr. Sanjay

    Very interesting and thought-provoking. Thanks for this.

  61. The Peul says:

    While the article’s descriptive sections had good historical analysis, especially describing Huxley’s analysis on the origins of the “all men are created equal” belief, its recommended solutions are entirely insane to me and I doubt any serious person believes this is possible.

    Does the author really believe that a white etnho-state can be established and forcible kicking out all non-whites? What about people that are half white? Are they also kicked out? And why the assumption that African nations will take in millions of black Americans, especially if the reasons that they should take them in are on genetic and ethnic lines, when this is clearly no longer the case: black Americans are genetically distinct from Africans on the African continent after over 300 years of being separated from one another. African countries themselves are riddled with ethnic conflict with some settling these conflicts by butchering each other in Civil Wars. Again if the argument by the white ethno-state is that they need to rid themselves of black Americans for racial cohesion, shall African nations accept millions of black Americans — a different ethnicity at this point — to enhance their problems ? Does the author truly believe that black Americans will simply allow themselves to be deported from America without a massive racial civil-war breaking out? Just look at the mayhem that ensued after the death of George Floyd. Why would third generation Mexican-Americans, Asian-Americans, Korean-Americans, etc. emigrate to their countries of ethnic origin peacefully?

    To believe the solutions in this article would in anyway go about peacefully, is to be in complete delusion.

  62. anonymous[139] • Disclaimer says:

    I would estimate roughly that the average national IQ is going to drop by 5 points in 2050 versus what it was in 1950.* At the same time due to high IQ immigration, the top 5% of the country got a lot smarter. Since the top 5% contributes a lot to GDP per capita, I don’t know to what extent mass immigration by dragging down average national IQ is going to bring down the economy. But obviously, there won’t be an economic collapse since the IQ situation is not hopeless. There probably won’t even be a long-term economic contraction from where we are in 2021. The economy will just suffer from low growth for several decades.

    *1950: 90% white, 10% black
    2050: 45% white, 36% Hispanic/mixed/other, 13% black, 8% Asian
    Doing rough calculations I assume an IQ of 100 for whites in 1950 and 2050, 85 for blacks, 105 for Asians, and 90 for Hispanic/mixed/other. Based on those assumptions, I calculate a decline of 5 IQ points.

    • Replies: @littlereddot
  63. why have votes at all?

    Who decides whether I am just too dumb and pleasure-loving and generally unenlightened to have anything to say about the government that rules me? Can’t say I fancy Plato’s ideal republic at all. Someone else decreeing that I am to be subjected to coercion for my own good: sounds like a liberal.

  64. The US has 6% of the worlds population and uses 50% of the world’s oil refined into gasoline…that’s about 330,000 million people using 50% of the gasoline. There are many examples with food and other resources similar to that as well.

    The world is approaching 8 billion people and few want to live as indigenous tribes but the majority want to live like a modern western society of which the US has been the bell weather of that since post WW2……….

    but we can’t have everyone living life like Americans on this planet without exhausting the sustainability of it……….

    So we are faced with a dilemma………..

    1) Reduce the population so that what remains can continue some type of Western consumption/life style in balance with a sustainable rate of the planet’s renewal of resources…..(Georgia guide stones anyone?)

    2) Bring down the economy of 1st world countries to where everyone on the planet has the same consumption life/style that is sustainable to the planet.

    The plandemic seems to play into #1…………………..and build back better agenda seems to play into #2.

    I liken the situation to the Earth as a petri dish with a solution of water/sugar being the environment/resources and humanity a bacteria growing in that petri dish.

    What happens in the disk when the bacteria growth is at its peak at the moment it is absorbing all the water and runs out of sugar?

    I’m thinking people who consider themselves in control of this world are thinking about this and what to do about it……………..and now we are getting near that point of peak bacteria, maximum absorption of water and collapse of the sugar supply within that dish.

    • Replies: @littlereddot
    , @denk
  65. TTSSYF says:

    This article is merely more wishful thinking. None of those things listed by Dalton are going to happen and, at any rate, he doesn’t tell us how we should even begin to go about making them happen.

    To avoid overt, bloody civil war or drawn-out guerrilla war, I’ve been recommending for years that we quietly self-sort over the next decade or two, making purple or red states overwhelmingly red and making the blue states bluer than ever. It then might come to the point where both sides agree to formally establish separate federations.

    • Replies: @GeneralRipper
  66. Jon Chance says: • Website

    Thomas Dalton is a persuasive and well-informed author, but he’s profoundly mistaken on several key points, perhaps because he’s a National Socialist and a Jew.

    Alfred Rosenberg’s Myth of the Twentieth Century is absurd Talmudic propaganda suited for the Terrorist Theocracy of Israel.

    But Rosenberg’s Track of the Jew Through the Ages should be mandatory study for all voting citizens.

    https://archive.org/details/alfred-rosenberg-the-track-of-the-jew-through-the-ages_202006

    Why doesn’t Thomas Dalton offer Track of the Jew Through the Ages on his websites?

    http://Libertarian.Org

    • Replies: @where_are_the_bones
  67. Mr Anatta says:
    @Dr. X

    If the invading North Europeans had only come in peace without their guns and tried to learn from the native North American Indians the house may have stood for eternity.

    As the sayjng goes ‘Karma is a bitch’ and because there is no seperation between a country and an individual (dualistically speaking) then why can’t a country also suffer the effects of its collective negative Karma.?

    • Replies: @Old and Grumpy
    , @Anonymous
  68. Adûnâi says: • Website
    @Dr. Robert Morgan

    > “…the Christian’s belief that he is not his body, but rather a “soul” only temporarily inhabiting a body.”

    I concur, but there is one counter-argument that an honest debater would present. How come Islamists can profess a similarly idealist, Jewish ideology while remaining fairly firmly grounded in reality? They seem to relegate such theory to the vague background, almost like the inherently-anarchic and rootless Marxists who managed to build a relatively totalitarian state in the USSR and China.

    On another note, I still don’t understand how you reconcile such purely cultural approaches as in this post above with your general anarcho-primitivist point against technology. Coincidentally, this argument already covers said part, for both Soviet Russia and Maoist China were fairly industrialised (whatever you may say about the Arab world).

    My answer would be the secularisation of Christian church during the Enlightenment and the Industrial Revolutions, consummated in the Holocaust of the Germans. Any successful religion, no matter how insane on paper, will necessarily conform to reality, trimming its madness. The newborn liberalist hyper-Christianity, however, is wild and ephemeral. The unfortunate part is that the Aryan race doesn’t seem to survive the cultural red giant’s eventual demise.

  69. Agent76 says:

    A very good and accurate article.

    Types of Government, Explained

    This video explains the political spectrum in SIMPLE, RATIONAL terms, what is meant by (right/left wing), and what they stand for.

    George H.W. Bush New World Order Speech

    The New World Order is an unofficial name for certain types of organizations, globalists, and people in and out our government that want to destroy our US Sovereignty and get rid of our constitutional rights.

    • Thanks: Sarah
  70. Mr Anatta says:
    @Jeffrey A Freeman

    There never was ‘Man’ for God to ‘create’ in the first place in the dream and’self exists really is a false premise ‘and believe me there is not much point in loving or worshipping or even praying to nothing but that doesn’t mean the all seeing eye of the Nepalese Buddhist stupa isn’t observing your non self vibration and its dream actions.

  71. neutral says:

    That America must be destroyed is obvious, what comes after is what the real debate should be. It would be better that the states that exist now do not continue, there is a risk that they could reform. Better would be having the Pacific touching states become Chinese satellites, the Atlantic touching states Russian satellites (there would be no EU without a US), the states bordering Mexico being returned Mexico, the central states being recreated on ethnic population grouping. And ideally Washington, the very center of that cancer, being reduced to radioactive rubble.

    • Replies: @Adûnâi
    , @von Frey
    , @anon
  72. @Anonymous

    The Republic was slowly tortured to death starting with the Civil War and ending with the earned income tax.

  73. @Mr Anatta

    You do know the oldest human DNA found here was European. Also the reason the American (aka Not Native) Indians beat the crap out of competing tribes, and then enslaved those that remained. Not nice people.

  74. @Mr Anatta

    We have to be careful when we point the finger because there are always three pointing back at us.

    Spoken like a true sage, sir.

  75. KenH says:

    Therefore, it is time to accept reality and give up America for lost

    The late Wilmot Robertson said that America is lost and the goal must now be to save the remnants of the founding white racial stocks with ethnostates. America must die because we are under a Jewish occupation government and Jewish elites have and continue to remake America in their nefarious image and likeness which will lead to white genocide.

    And the work won’t be done if and when whites ever get ethnostates since Jewish elites will begin plotting against them like they have against enemies of Israel in the Middle East. So they will have to be stripped of their wealth and power since they invariably use it to damage white racial interests and white nations.

    • Agree: Katrinka
  76. anon[222] • Disclaimer says:

    I’ve lived in a 150-year old house for the last 20 years.


    What Dalton did not account for is that when this house was built, and when the US “democracy” was established 200+ years ago, the construction concept was for a small piece of territory and, more importantly, there was extensively more territory as a pressure-relief valve where similarly ambitious people could work out their ideas on new territory.

    My neighborhood was originally built and settled by persons of some wealth — not billionaires, but certainly persons with an entrepreneurial spirit who had been successful. They were successful enough that when, after a rather short time, the atmosphere surrounding them became unpleasant, they abandoned the neighborhood and created another new, grander, more carefully designed place to live just 15 miles away.

    The original neighborhood was derelict for many years — grand homes became houses of prostitution, or rooming houses (as mine was). Many were totally abandoned: roofs fell into the basement that became flooded with rainwater.

    About 50 years ago, one- by two- by five-young families purchased one of these derelict buildings and applied sweat equity and a lot of cash to renovating and restoring the house, then the house next door, then the street, then the block, then a ten block neighborhood. They established rules: certain elements of the original structures had to be retained.

    Today that gentrified neighborhood is one of the most desirable in its city. It’s a registered historic district.
    It’s a pain in the ass to live in and maintain a house that’s a century-and-a-half old — What shall it be this year: new windows? new roof? update the electrical system? You have to accommodate to sweaters in winter.

    I’ve lived in and restored simple houses built in the 1960s- to -1980s and it’s easier to do (and easier to heat and cool), but takes almost as much time and expense to maintain. No matter what is done, it looks like Home Depot. You don’t say Ahh! when you walk into a 1970s split-level like you do when you open a 12′ stained-glass door onto a hand-carved walnut staircase.

    The original structures in the 150 year old neighborhood are still standing, but already, many, many of the 1970s split levels have been demolished and “modern” homes constructed (of even cheaper and less durable components) on their footprint.

    Living in a parable.

    • Thanks: Jeffrey A Freeman
  77. @anonymous

    Have you seen Idiocracy? I highly recommend it. The message is prescient…but Terry Crews steals the show with pure entertainment value.

  78. @Anonymous

    Bingo. It’s The Lorax and Marilyn Manson on an extended date until the music stops.

    Plus, what made the USA great was a near-virginal land teaming with an obscene abundance of life and resources in the form of land, animals, water power, minerals and ores, etc. that was easy picking after the white man’s infectious diseases and guns devastated the native populations. Salmon and buffalo so thick no modern USAnian can fathom it, thick black soil several feet deep, clean water, beaver, and many more vanished riches.

    We indeed may shift into several smaller nations over the next few centuries, but nobody alive today in this wasted age, nobody who refers to this gluttonous and arrogant beast consciousness that still smugly refers to itself as “America” (a group of 35 nations over a vast territory, please get over yourselves) will have anything to do with that arrangement.

    Until then, the white folks and their Jewish banker pals who laid waste to the greatest and richest wilderness left in the world, with their guns and leaching tentacles so efficiently trained on the whole world since WWII, will keep on doin’ what they do ’til they can’t do it no more.

  79. Ann K says:
    @Dr. Robert Morgan

    Actually, it is an explicit Christian heresy to prioritize the soul over the body.

    Christians believe that God created everything—including the material world—and pronounced it “good,” and that our physical bodies will be resurrected in the life of the world to come.

    • Replies: @Jack McArthur
  80. I would refer you to the theory of anacyclosis: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anacyclosis

    According to this theory, societies tend to go through different forms of government, good and bad. The good ones degenerate into bad ones, at which point a new, good one restores order, until it degenerates into the next bad one etc. In this view, there are 6 modes of government, 3 good ones: monarchy, aristocracy and democracy, and 3 bad ones, tyranny, oligarchy and ochlocracy.

    Let’s say we start at monarchy. The king goes mad or bad so it turns to tyranny. He is then toppled by a group of virtous men, aristocrats. Inevitably, they use their political power to enrich themselves so we get to oligarchy. At that point the people revolt and instore democracy. Sooner or later, the people, coddled by demagogues, find out that they can vote themselves endless entitlements so we end up with ochlocracy, mob rule. At that point a strong man emerges to restore order, and we get back to square one, monarchy.

    In this view, there is not, one, ideal, form of government. All institutions that human take to govern themselves are subject to rot and degeneracy. The only answer is eternal vigilance, because you may think you have created the best system ever with nice counter balances and mechanisms for placing competent and virtuous men in power, but humans are ingenious and they will set to work immediately at devising new ways of corrupting it, enriching themselves, shirking their responsibilities.

    The only way to go is stern, disciplinarian virtue, punishing antisocial behaviour and rewarding merit. That is already a hard enough task in an ethnically and culturally homogenuous group. In a diverse society with different groups vying for power and accusing one another , it becomes impossible.

  81. anon[179] • Disclaimer says:

    There is a very strange trend of American blacks claiming they are the real indigenous American Indians who had their identity stolen and were lied to think they were African-descended slaves…..is it a coincidence this is becoming popular when “America” is collapsing? Thats right Tyrone and Shaniqua are wuz Cherokeeez n shieet. What a subhuman era to be living in.,…

  82. saggy says: • Website

    I haven’t read the article or comments, but I plan to. But just skimming the article I see one horrendous problem …. the history of Europe has been dominated by the religion of the Jews, in the form of Christianity. When it comes right down to it, Juduaism as per the Old Testament is death cult. G– is forever demanding human and animal sacrifices throughout the book. The Jews in Israel are planning on resuming animal sacrifices soon. The Christians replaced animal sacrifice with symbolic human sacrifice in the form of Jesus, who ‘died for our sins’. We lived with this all our lives and see it as perfectly normal, but … what kind of God demands human and animal sacrifice? Ans: a God of death, Judaism and Christianity worship killing. The most religious thing a Jew can do is sacrifice an animal to God. Christians worship Jesus on the Cross, a symbolic human sacrifice.

    There is certainly no chance of uniting the ‘whites’ against the predations of the Jews as long as they both worship the same God of death. And practically, there is no chance of uniting the whites against the Jews as long as the both practice what is essentially the same religion.

    That is another tough, probably impossible, nut to crack.

    THE RETURN OF RITUAL BLOOD SACRIFICE TO ISRAEL


    Video Link
    Numbers 19
    1 The Lord said to Moses and Aaron:
    2 “This is a requirement of the law that the Lord has commanded: Tell the Israelites to bring you a red heifer without defect or blemish and that has never been under a yoke.
    3 Give it to Eleazar the priest; it is to be taken outside the camp and slaughtered in his presence.

  83. @Critical Thinking

    2) Bring down the economy of 1st world countries to where everyone on the planet has the same consumption life/style that is sustainable to the planet.

    There is no need to. The average European uses half the energy of the average American, without a lower of standard of living. The American just has to adapt from his SUV gasoline guzzling, drive everywhere, whole wooden house heating, bigger is better, more is bestest mindset and that is a good start.

    The US military is the single largest user of oil in the world and one of the biggest emitters of CO2. Its energy consumption is equivalent to that of a medium sized country in Europe. Invade less countries, have less military bases around the world, and the world would thank you for it.

    If you really want reduce the population of the world, here is the solution…it is counter intuitive to US foreign policy, but it is clear………prosper the third world rather than keep buggering it.

    Countries that have recently risen from third world poverty into prosperity have shown drastic population growth rates. South Korea, Macau, Hong Kong, Singapore are all at barely replacement or below replacement levels of birth rate. You see, falling birth rates in developed countries is not something that only happens in white countries. It applies universally.

    So if the West really wants birth rates in the third world to fall, letting your mega corporations and their hired mercenaries aka MIC screw them for their natural resources is not going to help.

    Prosper them, so that you can save yourselves.

  84. HT says:

    America died awhile back actually. All that is Left now is the Jewocracy and its pets living off weak foolish people whose ancestors founded and built the country.

  85. geokat62 says:

    A combination of old age, disease, neglect, and poor hygiene have put it in a terrible state, one that is evidently beyond any hope of recovery or repair.

    None of that is the root cause. A certain group of people have placed dynamite at the foundations of our western homelands…

    ‘We will make the West so corrupt that it stinks.’ – Willi Munzenberg of the Frankfurt School

  86. Adûnâi says: • Website
    @neutral

    > “And ideally Washington, the very center of that cancer, being reduced to radioactive rubble.”

    Ditto, but what always pains my heart in such otherwise-innocent genocidal fantasies is the destruction of cultural artifacts, many from the previous eras – such as the 171 mil. items kept in the Library of Congress.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Library_of_Congress

    > “…the Atlantic touching states Russian satellites (there would be no EU without a US)…”

    Do you honestly believe the atomic-arms-possessing Islamists of England and France, and the Turks and Kurds of Germany to lie down and go gently into the night? After they achieve majority? When the entire petrodollar system comes down in a worldwide crash, they will fight for their place under the sun.

    > “Better would be having the Pacific touching states become Chinese satellites…”

    My pet dream is such a scenario in which the rabid, cultish American people descend into the anarchy of civil wars, and the remaining imbecilic élites decide in desperation to invite Chinese intervention to restore order. The magnitude of stupidity would be fitting for the transvestite paradise. My only hope is for the Mongoloid race to show no mercy in acquiring their Lebensraum in the East.

    • LOL: littlereddot
  87. This article is part of the new conspiracy to weaken America by encouraging hate and intolerance. And the narrative is designed to Balkanize America. A Balkanized America is far easier to be controlled by foreign powers. Perhaps Mr. Dalton can share the statistics of so-called genius population in STEM research by ethnicity and national origin. Lol!!! Oops. Come on guys – just face it. The inferiority complex of white men – of being less intelligent than Asians/Jews and less physically/sexually attractive than Blacks/Latinos – is overwhelming. And everyone understands that white women adore minorities (hence the trophy wives). But that shouldn’t lead to dividing the country. Just do your little militia thing on the weekends, wear your MAGA hats, and ride your bikes. That’s all you can do on your own in the modern world anyway.

    • Replies: @GenFranco
    , @littlereddot
  88. @Old and Grumpy

    What today we call a drug cartel…

    They then called an Indian tribe.

    • Replies: @Mr Anatta
  89. Mr Anatta says:
    @Old and Grumpy

    I am white Northern European and yet i will always take sides with all the slaughtered Native North American Indians(and their slaughtered livestock/food source) over the Euro invaders before the founding of the Unuted States.

    • Replies: @GenFranco
  90. @Anonymous

    ‘Conservatism’ was axiomatically identical with a fervent support for ‘capitalism’. Many here would blame ‘The Tribe’ for this. Maybe so, maybe no. But the fact that defense of virtue has shifted balance to the right foot after being so long a province of the left is curious.
    The problem with any of these systems is they will inevitably become corrupt and fall apart. Rome did. China did. Then as China or Europe has, they pick themelves back up and make something new. The heirs of Rome were the German nations who kicked the rotten old house over-Germany, France and England. China jus toughed out being kicked when they were down like the hero of one of those old boxing films and kept training- waiting for their day.
    It’s all well and good to pimp for aristocracy and through time, aristocrats have given us much of lasting value. The problem is Plato wasn’t talking about Herbert Whimplefuss, 3rd D Earl of Charmsbury. Inbed pedophile and sodomite. (Yeah- I invented that character just now- but you know what I’m talking about.) He was talking about Nietszche’s Uberman. Who is a kind of Utopia as a person. The Uberman is a mirage. Hitler wasn’t it. Niether was Audie Murphy or Ragnar Lothbrok.
    What we all really need to focus on is how to keep venal idiots and mendacious creeps like Adam Schiff or Dennis Hastert out of power. That challenge solved we can argue about the small stuff.

  91. Mr Anatta says:
    @Jeffrey A Freeman

    You talk about God but you are too mired in dogma to understand that drugs(especially psychadelic ones) are the only way to God in this realm.

    The ancient Greeks knew this and that is why ‘entheogen’ translates to ‘God within’.

    Blessed be all the Shamans for they were God.

  92. Anon[254] • Disclaimer says:

    Did the Poles, Lithuanian and Romanian who arrived here after 1990 build this country or did something else ?
    Where will they go back ? May be Hungary ?
    UK has sent them back or they left after graffiti started showing some in areas outside main cities .

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  93. Corvinus says:
    @The Anti-Gnostic

    “But we don’t even treat people the same under the law: insanity, mental retardation and tender years all get differential treatment from, say, Martha Stewart.”

    Put that on a bumper sticker. That will sell just like the solar-powered flashlight.

    “The context for Jefferson’s statement is the hereditary aristocracy…”

    Let us be more precise, shall we? Jefferson’s statement represented a broader context–the non-hereditary aristocracy (the “regular” people) no longer would be grounded to the nub by the whims of the titled nobility (the “elites”). Rather, they could determine for themselves how to pursue life, liberty, and the pursuit of mammon. The logical extension of this ideology occurred under the Jackson Administration, which promoted that political participation should be open to (white) males of age (the “regular” people), not exclusively property-owning males of age (the “elites”). This action was also radical and progressive. Now, I’ll leave it to you (foolish on my part, but maybe you will surprise me) to correctly figure out what was next step in this human political evolutionary process.

    • Replies: @The Anti-Gnostic
  94. funny says:

    “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.–” From the Declaration of Independence.
    Being created equal from birth does not imply in anyway that all men are equal in every way. We are all equal under the law and have the same rights to achieve. Some will and some will not.

    • Agree: HdC
  95. What I think is…

    China and Russia want all 50 states handed over intact. It’s the job of all the embedded ethno-racists to make that happen.

    Because why? Because they can ask a higher price for selling their captives as a big 50 state package.

    You think any of them do what they do for free? You think that ugly dude in the 5-Star Admiral skirt isn’t expecting massive remuneration?

    No matter what they say, they are all part of greater Soviet empire.

  96. HdC says:
    @Anonymous

    I disagree. It is UNBRIDLED capitalism, along with the voters electing representatives that promise “free stuff”, and a lack of personal responsibility, that is the undoing of the western world.
    Everybody talks about their rights, yet no one talks about responsibilities.
    Further, a lack of unbiased law enforcement, from the supreme court on down to the lowliest beat cop, breeds disrespect for law and order.
    Regarding capitalism: No other system or methodology has provided so much material wealth and comfort to the great unwashed. However, this system must be balanced with a sense of reasonableness.
    I think it was ancient Greek philosophy that counselled “everything in moderation”. Unfortunately western society no longer adheres to this admonition.

    • Agree: littlereddot, BAP
    • Replies: @littlereddot
    , @Nancy
  97. Anonymous[198] • Disclaimer says:
    @littlereddot

    Start packing.

    • Replies: @littlereddot
  98. are the only way to God in this realm

    A powerful and readily accessible way perhaps, but you don’t really mean the ONLY way do you?

    • Replies: @Mr Anatta
  99. Agent76 says:

    February 23, 2015 America Has Been At War 93% of the Time – 222 Out of 239 Years – Since 1776

    The U.S. Has Only Been At Peace For 21 Years Total Since Its Birth In 2011, Danios wrote: Below, I have reproduced a year-by-year timeline of America’s wars, which reveals something quite interesting: since the United States was founded in 1776, she has been at war during 214 out of her 235 calendar years of existence. In other words, there were only 21 calendar years in which the U.S. did not wage any wars.

    http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article41086.htm

    • Replies: @HT
  100. @Petermx

    But there may come a point where Whites have had enough.

    Wishful thinking only. No evidence for that. I’ve been hearing that refrain for 20 years, while the “bad enough” line has been passed by several times with no “had enough” reaction. That’s largely because Jews and what you’re calling White liberals anticipate such a reaction and make sure laws and systems are in place to prevent it.

    All these White men Thomas Dalton is depending on to secede and form their own nations are in no way, shape or form prepared to actually do such a thing. It’s been nothing but talk all along from frustrated weak men (with many infiltrators in the mix).

    Otherwise, I like and agree with your comment–especially “some Blacks have this bizarre idea that they made the USA into a great country. […] They actually say this on nationwide television and no White dares point out how retarded such a statement is.” Yes, this IS outrageous and reveals submissiveness to political correctness.

    • Replies: @Petermx
  101. @HdC

    I think the governance system has something to do with it, though maybe not as much as the author assumes.

    Elections as applied in the USA today, acts as a sedative. It lulls the public into believing that they are able to affect their future.

    Combine this with a constant media barrage that equates
    Elections = Democracy
    Democracy = Freedom
    Freedom = Best possible system

    Then it is no wonder why Americans keep going to the polls repeatedly to elect governments bought by big money that keeps screwing them over and over and over again.

    They can’t understand how they can have the Best Possible System in the world, and yet suffer so much in their daily lives. So they start looking for other people to blame. Then the media steps in and offers a plethora of Others to blame.

    Chinese, Mexicans, Blacks, Communists, Fascists, Muslims……ad nauseum.

    But don’t worry, this problem will all be solved at the next elections when we vote our guy in.

    It is so sad, it is almost funny.

  102. Anonymous[371] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anon

    No, they can stay.

  103. Anonymous[371] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anon

    Forcibly deporting you is going to be enjoyable.

    • Replies: @Anon
  104. HdC says:
    @Observator

    “Anglo-American gentleman’s code of honour”…
    Surely thou jests? Even during Roman times the moniker Perfidious Albion was applied to those “gentlemen”.

  105. HT says:
    @Agent76

    Most of them related to Jews in one way or another after 1900.

    • Replies: @Agent76
  106. Anon[982] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anonymous

    What is capitalism?

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  107. I remember when I was 8 to 10 years old I used to have intense discussions and arguements about building rocket powered vehicles with my young friends. All your arguements are in the same category.
    The systems of goverence can be myriad (i.e capitalism or Communism) and but the oversight and governance should be transparent. This is an impossible task and will always be corrupted gradually.

    Anyway, enough of the heavy stuff, here’s a story by Kurt Vonnegut that’s very relevent and will make you smile. This is from his anthology of shorts ‘Welcome To The Monkey House’. Buy the actual book, you will be able to read it again and again in sunlight.

    http://www.tnellen.com/cybereng/harrison.html

  108. Anon[982] • Disclaimer says:
    @Jack McArthur

    What is unregulated capitalism?

    • Replies: @Jack McArthur
  109. @The Peul

    Deserves the gold-square treatment.

    This article has interesting history, some admirable ideas (1, renew nobility in the republic; 2, restore democratic forms that act as an antidote or preventative to corruption),

    and otherwise

    It is delusional.

    And by delusional: it is disqualifying.

    And everyone in the Amen Choir in the comments section, disqualified.

    Because they are delusional. They not only don’t know how things work, they think they know how things work, they are cock-sure of it, while being as wrong as it is possible to be, about how things work.

    And attempting to work with disqualified people – is disqualifying.

    It is helpful when people out themselves as delusional. No further energy need be spent.

    If that’s the Unz Review MO – bravo man. Keep it up!

    • Replies: @GenFranco
  110. Traddles says:

    It’s good to see some actual ideas for a future system proposed, instead of the endless rehashing of what’s wrong. I think Dalton has a good appreciation for why things once worked well in America. He might be wrong about some other things, but I appreciate his efforts to diagnose and prescribe.

    And the following is an important element in how a system based on an aristocracy can succeed.

    The disenfranchised would not be made to feel inferior; rather, they would come to accept such a system as in the best interests of all.

    There once were successful, relatively healthy societies in which people understood this.

  111. Mr Anatta says:
    @littlereddot

    The only other way that is possible (as far as i know) is to put oneself in complete and utter darkness for days but it may take many many days or even weeks of total darkness for the pineal gland to be able to channel spirit at the same strength as say 5 grams cracker dry cubensis mushrooms, which is more or less an instant God experience, which only gets better and better and more powerful with experience, if one has a mastery of spirit on a meditative level like Buddha had and i have.

    I am not including death because this particular God experience of course certainly would not be remembered,unlike with mushrooms where one comes back to the non-reality with a memory of the experience.

    • Replies: @littlereddot
  112. anon[282] • Disclaimer says:
    @Mr. Sanjay

    Most of European history dealt with societies that were extractive institutions, were the vast majority of people were dirt poor and accomplished nothing apart from shitting out the next brood, and finally, were violence and slavery were the norm.

    • Agree: BAP
  113. Nancy says:

    Haven’t read all comments yet, hopefully this has already been surfaced. Perhaps the lemmings, identified by the submissive vaxxed, will be happy in the Reset (owning nothing, living in the Meta world with soma – secure and comfortable.. why not?)… and those who aren’t will live in the ‘favelas’… hopefully, smaller than typical and farther apart, closer to Dunbar’s number, and content with our original ‘mutual obligation’ economy (and primitive lifestyle) as described by Graeber, for one.

    ‘Freedom’ has a price, and maybe it is a life less comfortable and secure than the current …. which means that the vaaast majority will be happy with ‘submission’ as cattle in the ‘Termite World. And the Independents will not threaten the Termites… except in the Termites’ psychopathic view?.

  114. anon[282] • Disclaimer says:

    Read the book “why nations fail”. America is progressively becoming an extractive society where political, economic and social freedoms are curtailed. The obvious symptoms of an extractive society is an increasingLy wealthy elite that own most of everything! Most of human history was like this. America wasn’t like this in the beginning, America was mostly an inclusive society. Extractive societies are a direct contrast to inclusive societies were people are given freedoms especially economic freedoms to become entrepreneurs and such, where upward mobility was the result of hard work and success. Now in most of the west there is no upward mobility because the elites are closing the door behind them. Again this has always happened in human history, Ancient Egypt, the Roman Empire (the republic was generally inclusive), and the Soviet Union.

    Just look at this fact, the top 10% of American households now own 70% of total American household wealth according to fed reserve data. This figure will only grow with time. America is becoming a banana republic, Americans are becoming poor.

    • Agree: BAP
    • Replies: @Ron Unz
    , @Francis Miville
  115. Ron Unz says:
    @anon

    Read the book “why nations fail”. America is progressively becoming an extractive society where political, economic and social freedoms are curtailed.

    The concept is certainly an important one, but the book itself is absolutely dreadful as I discussed at length in an article almost a decade ago:

    https://www.unz.com/runz/chinas-rise-americas-fall/

    • Thanks: Raches
  116. @Corvinus

    “Hello, fellow high T white men!”

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  117. Goddard says:
    @follyofwar

    The most that Heritage America can strive for is to carve out a mostly homogenous new country (or countries) of like-minded individuals, with as little bloodshed as possible.

    Splitting up “with as little bloodshed as possible” would require gumption the likes of which I see nowhere among decadent white Americans. How about before we fantasize about The Republic of the Last Redoubt we do more practical things such as get out of debt, cut the cable, turn our backs on Sportsball, slim down, and build divorce-resistant marriages each producing three to four non-tatted, high-achieving, polite children?

    • Agree: Carolyn Yeager
    • Replies: @Exile
  118. SafeNow says:

    I am old. I remember 1962, and it was just fine, despite the factors identified in the essay.There are multiple chunks in the U.S. now where it is still 1962. Recently I dealt with a small company in a small city in Alabama, and they treated me with competence, courtesy, and care, answering my foolish questions with infinite patience. I suppose Folly’s concept is the best hope, i.e., separating-out the chunks. But I am pessimistic about his hope that effective borders for the chunks could be achieved.

    • Replies: @Mike Tre
  119. Nancy says:
    @HdC

    That’s the trouble with Capitalism… there is no ‘moderation’. “Laissez faire” only lasts until the plutos discover that ‘collaboration’ is more profitable than ‘competition’, and buy/capture the regulators, etc, etc, etc. Yes, the heat/light from the fire is great… unless is started on the living room floor, instead of the fireplace. Now, how to guarantee that… and the Termite Tribe has proved indefatiguably successful.. hence, dozens of attempted expulsions… Edward, Isabella, Adolf, et al. I think this is beyond dispute… ?

    • Replies: @HdC
  120. Abbybwood says:
    @sb

    I wonder how these demonstrations in Melbourne will affect the rest of the world? Seems to be a media blackout of this in the US:

    https://www.lewrockwell.com/2021/11/no_author/goodbye-premier-dan-andrews-the-melbourne-rebellion-has-begun/

  121. This is probably the best article I have read since I have been reading the Unz review and that has been almost since it’s inception. Top notch!!! It explains exactly why we are in our current predicament.

  122. Petermx says:
    @Carolyn Yeager

    You’re probably right. As I was writing the comment I was thinking that I’m not confident about what I wrote.

  123. All of civilization has entered the spoliation phase. Communist countries entered directly into it. The US entered with the establishment of the welfare state under the “new deal.” The death of America will not prevent the spoliation phase, it will accelerate the decline.

    Wishing otherwise will not prevent the accelerating decline.

    • Agree: BAP
  124. A divorce is needed but the exploiters aren’t going to go quietly back to Tel Aviv. There will be war.

  125. gT says:

    Interesting that Rome fell because human detritus washed over the borders. As I recall it was the White Germanic tribes who flowed over the Roman borders destroying Rome. Then it took the 1000 years of the Dark Ages for those White Germanic detritus to become civilized in turn, if one adheres to the generally accepted timelines that is. It was those White Germanic detritus who made modern society when they became civilized.

    Blacks compromised like 12% of the USA, Jews about 2%. So how can everything be blamed on either the Blacks or the Jews. The problem lies with the majority of the American population, the Whites. Most of them are a waste of White skin, to use a South African expression. Whites allowed the Jews to do as they please in the States, Whites allow Blacks to behave as they please in the States, Whites allowed the open borders policy which results in everyone else flooding into the country.

    Whites have to accept that some Whites are capable and most are no better than Blacks. White protectionist policies and welfare delusions in the past have resulted in the current crop of Whites being unable to handle adversity, as well as not even being able to use their brains to be able to see what is happening around them, and so consistently voting for and supporting, and even marching with, those who want them dead.

    So there is too much emphasis given to the Black White equality issue, and much too little attention given to the real cause of the problem, the intra-White disparities brought on by too much easy times.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    , @Raches
  126. @Priss Factor

    That was horrifying. Did that young man survive? He looks dead.

  127. Mike Tre says:
    @SafeNow

    Many haven’t noticed, but people of European descent are not allowed to have anything of their own. That is a globalist dictate. Anywhere racist Europeans go, oppressed negroes, asians, mestizos, and jews have the inalienable right to follow them and claim oppression.

    Not to mention how bad the things are that Europeans have created. Our culture, technology, infrastructure, engineering, they are all vastly inferior compared to back in Africa, Asia and Central America. That’s why so many people from those places come to Europe/the US, and not the other way around, because they feel they need to tell us so. How selfless they are indeed! to come live down at our level.

    Look at the comments of this website, for example. Every article is inundated with comments about how great China, Mexico, etc are from presumably people from those places. Why they don’t stick to commenting on China’s equivalent of TUR is never explored, but I’m sure something along the lines of “shut up” is the answer.

    • Thanks: Katrinka
  128. GeneralRipper [AKA "SnidelyWhiplash"] says:
    @TTSSYF

    To avoid overt, bloody civil war or drawn-out guerrilla war, I’ve been recommending for years that we quietly self-sort over the next decade or two, making purple or red states overwhelmingly red and making the blue states bluer than ever. It then might come to the point where both sides agree to formally establish separate federations.

    That’s an excellent suggestion but the Powers That Be are not going to allow it to happen. They’re busy importing more Blue voters as we speak. And Senile Joe’s “infrastructure bill” is going to fast track them into Red States whether anyone likes it or not.

    • Replies: @TTSSYF
  129. Anonymous[162] • Disclaimer says:
    @gT

    As I recall it was the White Germanic tribes who flowed over the Roman borders destroying Rome.

    Germans improved Rome. It was the trash that had piled up from places further South who brought Rome low. Germans were just tidying up.

    • Replies: @Francis Miville
  130. mephisto says:
    @Dr. Robert Morgan

    Right on.
    I have been telling Jewsus cult to get rid of Jewsus, but they are unable to. It’s better to worship Nietzsche. But the red necks, whom the author is extolling, are just to dumb to realize this.
    The systems the author advocates have already been tried and corrupted by Jews, who plan for centuries just like the Chinese.
    1)Aristocracy, look at England. Now the base for Rothschild. It was William Frederick King of England who allowed Rothschild to open shop and England allowed Rothschild to rule over the world to counter Hitler. So Aristocracy does not work.
    2) The author ignored the fact that the whites are too weak to hold onto power. Their minds were easily corrupted. The situation in America is a civil war, between Whites with allegiance to Jews and money (Your examples are right on: Carlson, Hannity, etc), and Whites with allegiance to their own race. Wait until the Chinese take over the world, Jews and Black will disappear. White will be consigned to Europe. Chinese will rule over the world for a thousand year as they once did and as Hitler tried to do.
    3)There is only thing that will bring down the system: mass hunger. Until then dream on.

    • Replies: @BAP
  131. Democracy is the necessary evil that we invented to fight the necessary evil of coercion. Nothing drives this point home like the ongoing CoVid debacle.

    Everybody wants to be the expert who has the ability to force their better understanding on all the fools. Or, at the very least, to be smart enough to wish people would obey better experts…

    Almost nobody considers the possibility that they themselves are the fools more often than not, and most significantly when they are convinced otherwise. Whatever your criteria may be for putting the best people in charge, you’re making their abuses and corruption inevitable.

    Democracy leaves the door open, and of course a lot of crap gets in. I’m not crazy about anything that locks the door and traps us inside.

  132. BAP says:

    Alternative forms of democracy can easily become excuses for more of the same, they can be easily manipulated and implemented with certain rules and scams that it looks like some utopian political system, but it’s just a bunch of criminal and insane jews again.

    Also I’m still having similar problems to this:

    https://www.activistpost.com/2019/09/fusion-centers-citizen-spies-and-the-debasement-of-the-american-character.html

  133. Agent76 says:

    November 15, 2021 Covid-19 and the New World Order. Who Owns Planet Earth?

    In lieu of Covid-19 killer vaccines, Dr. Vladimir Zelenko, MD, the acclaimed treating family physician for heads of state, has successfully cured over 6,000 Covid-19 patients with a combo of hydroxychloroquine, zinc, quercetin, Vitamin C and Vitamin D as an alternative treatment resulting in a 99% survival rate.

    https://www.globalresearch.ca/covid-19-and-the-new-world-order/5761565

  134. Agent76 says:
    @HT

    I do not profile people by color or religion. This is just me. Review the link I posted below for understanding. I take at specific people.

    Thus, consider Vanguard and Black Rock as a monopoly that owns everything. With due diligence you will discover that the major stakeholders of this monopoly are:

    Rothschild family
    Du Pont family
    Rockefeller family
    Carnegie family
    Orsini Family
    American Bush family
    British Royal family

    • Replies: @HT
  135. Primum censeo, ut civilis genus supersit, Americam civitatem esse delendam; deinde censeo, ut humanum genus supersit, Americanam homanitatem esse delendam ; ceterum censeo, ne orbis terrerum deleatur tota ad omnia aecula saeculorum, Americam esse delendam quosque opportet invenire modos, quia America horum temporum Carthago nostra est, nec Roma cumtemporanea.

    America is the modern world’s Carthage, not Rome. History cannot resume its pace until the world map is first rid of it. America is Amaliqa, the land of Amaleq.

    Talking of Greek democracy is of no purpose, except that the only big city of antiquity that had modern-style universal suffrage among two parties, albeit both controlled by the same oligarchical families, where the judicial branch of power reigned supreme over all others, where the world stock exchange (Bursa, the first of its kind in the West) was the hub of all public life rather than an agora or a forum, which counted on foreign-recruited mercenaries first and foremost for its military ventures and where foreign-recruited immigrants were considered better citizens than old-timers, was indeed Carthage, not Athens, not Rome. Demos in Athenian Greek meant party (or class) not people, so Athens was a one-party oligarchical republic of the 3% at the very most. You inherited your right to participate from both parents like being part of Koweit’s emir’s greater tribe entitles you you to participate in political debates there while most of everything built has been built by expats who want even less themselves to participate than they are barred from any such possibility : in the same way all the monuments you still see in Athens were build by non-citizens recruited as expats. America, like Carthage, was founded by and for a semitic elite (which by the standards of nowadays would qualify as Jewish, though not those of by then) having come from the Levant to open the place to mass immigration.

    • Replies: @BAP
  136. Ann K: “Actually, it is an explicit Christian heresy to prioritize the soul over the body.”

    That’s a truly bizarre interpretation which would lead to the conclusion that Jesus himself was a heretic, since he is the one who utters not only the passage I quoted above , but also such admonitions as “if your eye causes you to stumble, gouge it out and throw it away” (Mt. 18:9), and “If your hand or your foot causes you to stumble, cut it off and throw it away.” (Mt. 18:8)

    Ann K: “Christians believe that God created everything—including the material world—and pronounced it “good,” … ”

    Where in the Bible does God pronounce Satan “good”? Where does he pronounce sin “good”?

    Ann K: “… and that our physical bodies will be resurrected in the life of the world to come.”

    Thus proving my point that a Christian believes this present world and all it contains (including his body) to be transient and therefore essentially worthless. All that’s important to him are the fictional things upon which he pins all his hopes, such as the “soul” he imagines himself to be, and an equally imaginary “world to come”.

    • Agree: Raches
    • Replies: @Raches
  137. BAP says:
    @Francis Miville

    Being resistant to cliques of criminals influencing the government would require many methods to keep them and other groups away from it (including stupid people who only do whatever the criminals want), to increase transparency, accountability and auditability for every decision, to involve as many persons with common sense as possible as a way to avoid lobbying and conspiracies, to avoid censorship and spying, to reduce the harmful effects of collective stupidity or herd effect…

  138. Send these migrants to Hollywood.

    They sure know the art of manipulation. But then, the Jewish-controlled media operates just like Hollywood. Send the migrants to US media. They should make for ideal hiring.

  139. ricpic says:

    Even if one agrees with the author’s prescription: the expulsion of blacks, Jews and hispanics, it would take an absolutely dictatorial regime to accomplish those expulsions. In other words we are in the realm of fantasy.

  140. Adûnâi: “How come Islamists can profess a similarly idealist, Jewish ideology while remaining fairly firmly grounded in reality? They seem to relegate such theory to the vague background, almost like the inherently-anarchic and rootless Marxists who managed to build a relatively totalitarian state in the USSR and China.”

    Islam and Marxism aren’t any less race-blind than Christianity. It’s just that Christianity, with its hypocritical blather about love and equality, has by most measures been more successful in empire-building so far.

    Adûnâi: “… I still don’t understand how you reconcile such purely cultural approaches as in this post above with your general anarcho-primitivist point against technology.”

    I’d say you still don’t understand it because you insist on sticking to a Christianoid view of man as a special creature, uniquely endowed with “free will”. Because of that, you’re neither fully a Darwinist nor a technological determinist, whereas, as I’ve pointed out before, I think we can more properly understand biological evolution itself as a kind of evolution of technology; a battle in which Nature pits various technologies (i.e., life forms) against each other. Christianity, Islam, and Marxism are only extensions of this battle, rival technologies that share certain fundamental features in common because they’ve been proven to work; most notably, growth by assimilation (including genetic assimilation) rather than extermination. That this growth is destructive to the continued existence of discrete races is just an unfortunate side effect. Eliminate the cause, and you get rid of the side effect.

  141. Bernie says:

    I agree that we need separation. I would settle for a red/blue separation at this point. The people in control of the US simply hate white people and want us dead or in jail (see Rittenhouse and Arbery trials).

  142. What are your plans for Ron Unz?

  143. Wow, now I’ve seen everything. An atheist scholar does an *alter call* for religious recruitment in his own essay.

    [13] Now, if we could only get [Andrew] Anglin to drop his allegiance to the Judeo-Christian God and to that long-dead Jewish rabbi, he would be much better off.

    Come on Andy… put down that Bible and read my books! Didn’t you know that ((get this)) … Jesus was a Jeeeeeeeewwwwwww!

    No thanks, I’ll stick with Jesus.

  144. TTSSYF says:
    @GeneralRipper

    Sigh. You’re probably right. Alaska may be our only hope. Or maybe we can help Trump buy Greenland and go there.

  145. @Anonymous

    Saying that Christianity’s dead and buried is silly. It’s still and always be a strong force in the world, the only thing is that the leaders of most of our western governments think that they are the strongest force in the universe and that people are accountable to them and not God. We are living in godless times and the western world is suffering because of this. Covid and all it’s attendant problems are going to force people to return to the basics because that’s all they will have. Religious faith becomes stronger in difficult times and becomes weaker in prosperous times, it’s human nature.

    • Replies: @Francis Miville
    , @von Frey
  146. Raches says: • Website
    @Dr. Robert Morgan

    Never waste your time arguing theology with a Christian.  Christian doctrines mean whatever Christians want them to mean; and the whole enterprise is as productive as arguing over Darth Vader’s true intentions towards Luke Skywalker.

    Don’t forget that during the American Prohibition of alcohol, some Christian preachers “proved” that Jesus “really” drank unfermented grape juice at the Last Supper, and therefore was fully in compliance with the holy writ of the Eighteenth Amendment.  (An amusing anecdote about this is recounted in the book that Archive.org is censoring.)  And let’s not get started about how Abolitionist preachers lied, and still lie, to deny that the New Testament in its original Greek explicitly authorizes slavery.  Nerds who argue over fantasy movies and novels as if they were real actually make more sense than typical Christians. ®

    • Replies: @Francis Miville
  147. HdC says:
    @Nancy

    It’s been my observation in my career that spans 50 years and a number of different employers including 10 years of self employment prior to retirement, that meritorious individuals are able to make any system work well. On the other hand, political appointees and those in positions due to who the know or are related to, will foul up the best operating systems, be it business or government.
    That is why I advocate that voters pick their candidate from their own socioeconomic background, with an impeccable record in business operations. And the smallest electioneering budget so as not to be beholden to any money men.
    Without a functioning meritocracy society is doomed.

    • Replies: @The_MasterWang
    , @Nancy
  148. Raches says: • Website
    @gT

    Interesting that Rome fell because human detritus washed over the borders.  As I recall it was the White Germanic tribes who flowed over the Roman borders destroying Rome.

    That is pseudohistory, apparently being circulated amongst the boobs of the alt-right.  See discussion here:

    https://www.unz.com/proems/america-is-a-nation-of-hate/?showcomments#comment-4971848

    Between immigration and failure to reproduce, the Romans effectually replaced themselves centuries before Late Empire period as to which you refer.  But I guess it’s always fashionable to blame the Germans for something.

    Blacks compromised like 12% of the USA, Jews about 2%.  So how can everything be blamed on either the Blacks or the Jews.  The problem lies with the majority of the American population, the Whites.

    Here, I largely agree with you.  Whites need to take responsibility, and stop whining like a bunch of welfare cases about how they’re oh so oppressed.  It is behavior suitable only for eine minderwertige Rasse.

    If Aryans had not given the Jews power, the Jews would be nothing!  With some notable exceptions, Jews are uncreative people.  Typical “antisemites” speak of the Jews as if the Jews were some almighty race of Supermen—or perhaps, as if Yahweh’s Chosen Pets were truly a race of gods.  Stop it!  Cut the Jews down to size.  And let us not even speak of the rhymes with triggers.  If your slaves conquer you due to the weaknesses of your own society, then who are the natural born slaves, and who are their proper masters?

    If Aryans started to behave like proper Aryans, then they could take control like the Germans did under Hitler.  Oh, wait.  Who put an end to that?  White people.  The worst of whom are the most dangerous enemies of the best.

    White power will happen when white people have the Weltanschauung of the powerful.  That requires cultural change.  It requires extirpating the democratic disease, and affirming the aristocratic principle as a law of Nature.  Most of all, it requires being rid of the racial poison of Christianity—the root cause of many of these other problems, most of all of egalitarianism, modern democracy, and (per a future blog post) feminism. ®

  149. Anon[254] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anonymous

    Are you trying to enter again from Poland ?

  150. anon[275] • Disclaimer says:

    At the simplest level, we could retain elections for officeholders but permit only the wiser—smarter, more educated, more accomplished—individuals to vote. It could be very basic: require that voters earn a college degree, for example; or score above average on an IQ test; or distinguish themselves in some other relevant way

    America is already ruled by an aristocracy. These modern day aristocrats are the graduates of our elite universities. The graduates of these colleges that used to only accept rich WASPs went on to lead all the institutions in this country, from politics to business, education, law, media, entertainment, publishing. The Jews know from early on that education is where the battle is, which is why they worked hard to take over these elite universities starting in the 70’s.

    The nation’s top 12 universities – the Ivy League, Stanford, MIT, UChicago, Duke, are all run by Jews. In addition to training all the leaders of other universities and US society, these schools are also the origin of all the left wing lunacy. Whatever these schools do, all others follow. All of America’s problems begin with our elite universities. For America to survive, our universities need to burn to the ground, starting with the elites. We need to pass a law to make these left wing hypocrites eat their own bullshit by admitting 100% black students as reparation, until such time as black and Jewish wealth reach parity.

    Education is not a competition. But in this country, we made it a competition through the concept of elite universities. The competition to get into these colleges distorts the value of our society from the start. Instead of teaching our children to learn for learning’s sake, we teach them to get good grades so they can get into an elite college, so they can go on to an elite career in a lucrative field like law, finance, consulting, IT, politics, and make a fortune, that is the definition of success, a good life. These elite colleges serve as the golden handcuffs for our youth, to trap them into aspirations of financial success as definition of success in life. As a result, our best and brightest are the most willing to sell their soul, say what they need to say, do what they need to do to get there so they are not seen as failures.

    The Jews understood this well. These are the people who got rich selling fruit flavored tobacco to the austere Dutch in the 1600’s, seduced them with gluttony, then built huge mansions on prime riverfront properties in Amsterdam to entice the austere Dutch into wanting the same. That is always their way. By selling sin — tobacco, drugs, alcohol, gambling, prostitution, pornography, you can always make a buck by appealing to the lowest common denominator. Once they get rich, flaunt their wealth through ostentation – the luxury mansions, private jets, yachts, jewelry, expensive clothes, expensive restaurants, luxury hotels. Make the gentiles all want what you have, then they’ll willingly sell their soul to get these beautiful things you dangle in front of them.

    The elite universities are the country club where the Jews recruit and train our best and brightest to do their bidding. To save America, begin by burning all our elite universities to the ground. Make them live up to their own left wing hypocrisy of equality for all by admitting 100% black, until black and Jewish wealth reach parity. We all know what will happen to these schools once they become 100% black, but the Jews who run these schools will have us think otherwise, let them eat cake.

    • Replies: @Francis Miville
  151. @Mr Anatta

    From what I understand from what you wrote, is that it is indeed possible with practices such as meditation. But I extrapolate that for most of us, the effort and focus that it requires is beyond what we are usually willing to give.

    Therefore for us living in the modern world, an entheogen is the most realistic avenue? Am I understanding you correctly?

    • Replies: @Mr Anatta
  152. @Anonymous

    Start packing.

    Don’t need to. I don’t live in that shithole.
    Thank the gods.

    Time to learn Mandarin. Your future landlord will give you discount on your rent.

  153. Just a coincidence. LOL

  154. @Joe Paluka

    It turns out that it far from true : in two remarkable examples, India (traditional) and America, the richer you are the more prone you are, statistically, to indulge in religious activities, both as an ostentation of your success before God and local established churches, and also as a more authentic quest for some sort of personal experience of your own related to the supernatural. In India the correlation is exceptionally strong : belief in gods, or in the Abrahamic God, that doesn’t matter, go on a par with economic success, as if divinity and money were two close facets of the same thing, actually a direct contact with the supernatural is seen as a passport to rob riches from the great unwashed and unbathed. Even in the case of those Jews this site makes into a duty of denouncing day after day for their civilization-destroying propaganda and their heavy-duty selling of atheism, it happens that these Jews are the most faithful and active practicers of either Judaism either of some more exotic religion they might have adopted or invented as a means to write best-sellers about it. On the other hand agnosticism and serious doubts about the seriousness of belief in religion have always been rife in both country among the economically disoriented or the bohemian too educated for their level of fortune. What you should have said is that such a religiosity as is promoted by the rich to celebrate their success or to enjoy the luxury of a supernatural life or also to feel entitled as an elect to ruin your country for your soul and your group, cannot but bequeath more and more misery to the country at large and to the future generations.

  155. @HdC

    A meritocracy is inherently doomed. People who are good at doing their jobs can’t compete with people who are good at installing themselves in high positions. A democracy makes it all the more likely.

    • Replies: @BAP
    , @Miro23
    , @littlereddot
  156. von Frey says:
    @neutral

    I would rather reduce the entire nation to radioactive rubble than “return” any of it to Mexico.

  157. @Generalfeldmarschall von Hindenburg

    ‘Bed is the poor man’s opera’

    Applicable to some I give you that. But to apply it to all would be using too broad a brush.

    For example Singapore was once a poor third world country with a per capita GDP the same as Ghana. 50 years later, it exceeds the USA. The same trend for South Korea and increasingly so China. Is this then a phenomenon based on race? It is tempting to think so.

    Then we look at the recent impressive development of Rwanda after their devastating genocidal civil war. They have ambitions to be the “Singapore of Africa” and instituted policies to achieve it matched with will and discipline.

    Incidentally Singapore in its early years had the also ambition to be the “Switzerland of SE Asia”, and it too adopted policies to achieve it, also matched with will and discipline.

    It is early days yet. When more nations of Africa do follow the lead of Rwanda and start to rise, we will have a clearer picture of how much prosperity is a matter of government policy VS race/culture.

  158. @Raches

    You refer mostly to Saint Paul : he authorized and even sanctified slave employment relationships only when they were already in place, in the hope they might gradually transform into more amicable employer and employee relationships, but he also prohibited enslavement of free people, even oneself, on any circumstance, as well as slave-trading and acquisition of new slaves : they were part of the trades, usury being the first and foremost, that were strictly prohibited to all Christians, both as merchant and mere customer. You could neither open a pawn shop nor pawn your goods for money without committing a sin sanctioned by excommunication, neither have any dealing with slave trade or prostitution. This reputation of Christianity as a particularly slavery-friendly religion is like Catholic Christianity’s more recent reputation as the religion of pedophilia par excellence : it is made up by the academia in as much as it falls under Jewish influence. Both Judaism and Islam authorize slave-making and slave-trading when it comes to people outside the fold. The Hindu religion, as a prime representative of what would have existed in Europe but for the advent of Christianity, postulates that many people are natural born slaves by essence.

  159. BAP says:
    @The_MasterWang

    Power hungry subhumans will always exist in every context, and they will always try to gain more and more attention, control, pampering, … as part of their mental problems, but there are methods to try to contain those homosexuals. Too bad those methods are just too complex and minuscious to work for too long or be used effectively, a small set of idiots or fags can cause a domino effect and ruin everything.

    They involve a constant monitoring of the person’s history for relevant problems (not effeminate nitpicking and excuses for concern trolling, which is usual), real neurological and psychiatrical evaluations (which doesn’t exist and probably never will for obvious reasons), ignoring all their drama and lies… all of those are complex and require a certain level of intelligence and mental sanity most people don’t have.

  160. von Frey says:
    @Joe Paluka

    Saying that Christianity’s dead and buried is silly. It’s still and always be a strong force in the world, the only thing is that the leaders of most of our western governments think that they are the strongest force in the universe and that people are accountable to them and not God.

    Which church is a strong force?

    Which church actually stands and defends ancient Christian doctrine? Which church condemns gay “marriage”, faggotry, transvestites, or women in the pulpit? Which church refuses to endorse the supremacy of the Jews? Which church defends European Civilization?

    Tell me so I can join.

    The Church has fallen. The Church has become an instrument of Israeli foreign policy, and is rife with fags, lesbians, trannies and other abominations from the back of the congregation all the way to the pulpit, and from the local church all the way to the top. The enemies of all things decent long ago burrowed deep into and destroyed from within the mainline churches, beginning with The Episcopal Church. From there, they slowly took over every denomination in the Western world, culminating in the current collapse of the Catholic Church, the retirement of Benedict and the ascension of Francis. Even the Southern Baptists are on the gay train, now.

    No… you personally may be a strong Christian, but there is no “strong” organization furthering your beliefs in society at large. Organized Christianity is at a standstill. The gates of hell have triumphed.

    • Replies: @Katrinka
    , @Francis Miville
  161. Anonymous[414] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anon

    What is capitalism?

    Let’s suppose that beliefs are exposed by actions, the “revealed preference” methodology. Marx pretty much invented “capitalism” as a concept, and generally described it as control of society by controlling the means of production (capital goods, labor, business). He pointed out that the controllers were not aristocrats or peasants, but rather “the bourgeoise. Bourgeoise are townies, people who work for a living by managing private businesses. Note the similarity to the “oriental despotism” theory of Wittefogal, who said that whoever controlled the irrigation system of irrigation dependent agricultural societies also controlled the entire society.

    One of the Marxist’s themes in the US was that the Capitalists had industrialized, and now the smart people (Marxists) would take control and run the industries better, and for the good of all. In the US, the theme of taking over a deserted mansion and happily living in it was a literary metaphor for the takeover of industry, and the “mixed economy” a way of taking control of industry while running it better than could its participants.

    However, Marxist practice has had very little to do with capital goods, labor, or business. USSR communists lost control of Russia because they did not understand capital goods, labor, or business. These things just were not of interest to Communists. They could not support their own workforce, and their manufacturing sector transformed valuable raw materials into unsalable artifacts and unusable military weapons. Eventually (late 1980s), they were rejected by their base society.

    Nor were capital goods, labor, or business of interest to the Western / US “mixed economy” politicians, who de-industrialized the United States. After 2021 the Afghanistan debacle ended any US influence in Asia, and after the 2021 effective disengagement from NATO in favor of AKUS (https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2021/09/15/joint-leaders-statement-on-aukus/) the military dominance that had let the US live off the rest of the world ended, and the US is likely to recapitulate the USSR of the 1980s.

    What was of interest to Communists and “mixed economy” supporters was (and is) destroying competent people — anybody who claimed autonomy, an ability to manage his or her own affairs, anybody who might possibly be capable of existing outside of an authoritarian state. Successful farmers, engineers, businessmen, even Party members, were the target. Since the Communists said and perhaps believed that “capitalists” were their only victims, it follows that the “capitalists” were autonomous and competent individuals. Much the same people were victims in the “mixed economy”.

    The contemporary US system has been a bit softer than Communism, but targets the same people. In the West, the idea is more to enslave the capitalists than to kill them.
    Consider this quote:

    They tell you to study hard, work hard, and obey the law.
    Then they give your money to people who do none of these things.

    and this one, which rephrases the same thought:

    From each according to his abilities, to each according to his needs

    And that’s what Marxist practice reveals “capitalism” to mean: the set of all humans who can exist independently of politics. Therefore: the only people who have something that politicians can take.

  162. BAP says:
    @mephisto

    I just fucking hate anything that has its origins in jews or similar groups of psychopaths (those are more tricky to know about), but I don’t expect hardcore believers to abandon their brainwashing because that is impossible.
    But exposing its questionable origins, its contributions to crime, mental illness and war, the shady members, … may help some people understand it better. And I tried to do so in /pol/ with some assistance for the last years

  163. HT says:
    @Agent76

    The old money you cite in Blackrock like Rockefeller and Dupont is just trust funds and the like. They have no interest in the management of Blackrock. They are just dead people and their worthless descendants. Jewocracy kingpin Larry Fink calls the shots at Blackrock.

  164. @anon

    I would not only close down all universities in the US but instate very stringent affirmative action programs for those who never went there and criminalize any requirement or preference for graduates from these institutions. Having made any fortune from these institutions should be shamed like having got rich through negro slave trade. The only exception I would make would be for those who engage in superior studies related to their own religion or under their own religion’s close supervision. Jews should not be allowed to teach anywhere else than to believers in their own thing, so as Catholics and Hindus. I would consider certain brands of Marxism to be religions, though, in the same way Satanism is. But if you belong to a religion you solemnly renounce to all others and you have no business teaching anything to anybody outside your fold nor learning anything from anybody outside your fold : if you are a Marxist you cannot teach to people outside the party. If you do or teach yoga, you have to be a Hindu first, unless you do it for completely free with no formal degree in sight. When you get a degree in anything from a teaching institution attached to a religion you cannot be hired by anybody outside your religion while prevailing of your degree and formation given by that religion. In the best case you have to pass again the exams as given by your prospective boss’s religion’s teaching institution on the condition your conversion to that new religion is serious. If you come from Hindu India even after having been taught by secular institutions you cannot get employed in the US by a Protestant or a Jew unless you first convert very seriously to that particular form of Protestantism or Judaism. Secular humanism is not a valid religion as such though it is a valid opinion that can be taught as part of the curriculum of open-minded religions, in the same way music is not a religion though it is a valid art that can be taught as part of a religious practice. But all these stringent requirements I am listing I intend to make graduate studies as we know them outlawed for the most part and nearly all teaching institutions to close down.

  165. Johan says:

    The house is in decline not because of old age, but because democracy equals decline. Democracy is the rule of the corrupt and the incompetent, it is endless mob rule, a tyranny of mediocrity, and constant destruction of culture and tradition guided by a long list of demagogues. To compare a culture with a house is a bad analogy though. A culture can have a birth period which can last centuries, a flowering period of centuries, and a decline period which can last for centuries. The US could have been the world’s highly cultured guiding light, but its culture went into corruption and decline far before it could flourish, dragging a great deal of the world down with it.
    Anyway, it is refreshing to see the all ruling religion of democracy being attacked. To add a few names to those who were against democracy: Voltaire and Rousseau. Aside of those there were many many other venerable an intelligent historical men (revolutionaries) who were against democracy (democratic propaganda has ‘filtered’ all that).
    All contemporary ‘democratic houses’ are currently corrupt, ruled by the incompetent, they are all culturally dying, if not next to dead already. It is merely a global propaganda of technological glamour and futurism which keeps it hidden from sight.

    The religion of democracy appears about all ruling, it is by far the most pervasive intensive contemporary brainwashing operation, perhaps even without historical precedent.

    • Agree: HdC
  166. Anonymous[414] • Disclaimer says:
    @Mr Anatta

    If the invading North Europeans had only come in peace without their guns and tried to learn from the native North American Indians the house may have stood for eternity.

    Right you are. The practice of torturing war captives to death for entertainment just might have led to fewer people wanting to come to the US and attacking the previous arrivals.
    Visit, learn, return with the guns.

  167. Katrinka says:
    @von Frey

    The New Testament predicted a falling away. I Timothy 4:1. The “gates of hell” failed. Revelation 1:18.

  168. @von Frey

    If the gates of hell have triumphed over any church, it means that such a church never was legitimate the very day of its inception, as that is the case of all American religions such as Calvinism the day they touch ground on American soil : they were all heresies from the Pilgrim fathers onwards. The gates of hell haven’t prevailed over the Catholic Church while it was extant but the Catholic Church just renounced to most of its members during the Vatican II council, judging that nobody would listen and be saved anyway if they went on teaching : so they allowed an antipope (John XXIII) to seduce away all souls he could while a very little number went on underground with the true doctrine, mostly in Portugal and Portuguese speaking countries. Since 1960 the Catholic Church has opted to become underground again and what is now not underground, as for instance the New church that took over the buildings in Rome, is always heretical : anyway the use of modern media such as daily newspapers, theatre or film, even for the propaganda of true religious ideas, is a mortal sin. In any form of spectacular society where films and over-education are not strictly prohibited the Catholic church cannot exist any more than in a prostitution house (actually it is worse). A saint that doesn’t flee by instinct all cameras pointing at him or her (as all traditional peasants used to do without being taught in all previous civilizations) proves by that very fact to be rather a Hell’s Angel. When a church decides to go underground you don’t force her back into the open, that’s her decision and what she demands from you is the respect of its secrecy she needs for that particular phase of her work.

  169. GenFranco says:
    @Reality is Self Related

    I cannot decide if your comment is parody, self-delusion, reefer-inspired basement snark, or serious (albeit seriously dim-witted) commentary.

    But it was humorous, I’ll say that much. Good luck with your wife.

  170. GenFranco says:
    @Mr Anatta

    I’m sure the buffalo appreciate you taking their side in 2021. I know I speak for everyone here when I say we appreciate you constantly reminding us that you are to the left of the rest of us and that you favor every race but your own.

    We’ll all be sad when you find something else to do with your life.

    • Replies: @Mr Anatta
  171. anon[117] • Disclaimer says:
    @neutral

    It’s actually somewhat disturbing that people have to bash America like this. People either think the US is an absolutely awful place that should be scorned with every second or their free time, or the best society in history by far that’s above any criticism at all. Both are dishonest and misguided ways of looking at things, and should be discounted.

    The US is a great country, let’s be completely clear though, great doesn’t mean perfect, nor does it mean the US doesn’t have things that need to be rectified, this seems to be what the bash-america crowd fails to understand.

    1. Geography for starters, the US quite literally hit the geographic jackpot, as it’s surrounded by two large oceans, and is far away from any country that could be threatening.

    2. The US adopted the best parts of the British system, like common law, that allowed it to grow as a stable country. British style capitalism also allowed the US to grow wealthy.

    3. The American people themselves are a great group of people overall, and people don’t tend to realize it, but are some of the most giving people on the planet. Everyone in the US for the most part is, or has ancestors that came from somewhere else, which brought a wide variety of experiences to the country, and enriched it to a degree that cannot be overstated.

    Because of these, America today is a large country with a high standard of living, and a pretty good system overall, though obviously as the bash-americas are going to point out in the comments, it’s not a perfect country, nonetheless, it’s one we should all be thankful to be from.

    • Replies: @littlereddot
  172. @Anonymous

    Rome didn’t fall to the Germanic tribes : Rome moved to Constantinople (in just a few years Rome passed from more than one million to less than 50 000 while Constantinople went from 50 000 to 600 000), as Rome’s site was getting uninhabitable due to malaria from the nearby spreading Pontine marshes nobody knew how to drain, and the fruitful business to be done was concentrated in that sunnier and healthier part of the empire. I was like moving the American capital city from DC to Colorado Springs, which any honest head of state would do right away so as to leave the marshes of DC to the black mobsters and eventually sell the land to some African country or ME Emirate when real estate prices have crumbled down to below zero.

  173. GenFranco says:
    @SimplePseudonymicHandle

    “No further energy need be spent.”

    You spent far too much energy on this post anyway. And it wasn’t even clever. Re-read it and be shamed.

  174. anon[117] • Disclaimer says:
    @Dr. Robert Morgan

    USA has several things going for it:

    1. USA is the world’s largest economy by nominal GDP. (Unfortunately, not by GDP PPP.) Immigrants flock to America for economic opportunities.
    2. USA has the world’s largest military. Its ability to project military power around the globe is second to none.
    3. USA has the best technology, especially in the areas of semiconductors, medicine, and space.
    4. USA has some of the best universities in the world.
    5. USA has massive global cultural influence, especially in language, movies, music, sports, etc.

    However, to call USA one of the greatest countries in the world on the above basis would be a real stretch. America is beset by many, many, many severe domestic problems. Nonetheless, the doom-and-gloom scenario presented in articles like these are disingenuous.

    Thomas Dalton is clearly a Russian agent.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  175. denk says:
    @Critical Thinking

    1) Reduce the population so that what remains can continue some type of Western consumption/life style in balance with a sustainable rate of the planet’s renewal of resources

    Reduce the yellow population …
    FIFY

    Jack London,
    The original thinker
    He predicted the rise of China ….
    and the solution.

    [MORE]

    China’s population must be seven hundred millions, eight hundred millions, nobody knew how many millions, but at any rate it would soon be a billion. There were two Chinese for every white-skinned human in the world… There was talk of all countries putting bounties on children to increase the birth rate, but it was laughed to scorn by the arithmeticians, who pointed out that China was too far in the lead in that direction.

    Where have we heard that before? Smugly, China’s Emperor basically told the world, “Come and get us!” The Western nations set aside their differences and mobilized. The mission was for containment. Biological warfare did the dirty work—a pretty grim end.

    Five years and hundreds of millions of treasure were consumed, and then the world moved in—

    After Western nations repopulated the desolate land that was China…

    [1]

    —————-

    gotmituns

    It’s my guess, America died about the time of WW2. From then on we’ve been an empire.

    1895
    Massachusetts Senator Henry Cabot

    “We have a record of conquest, colonization and expansion unequaled by any people in the Nineteenth century. We are not about to be curbed now.

    They’ve never looked back since… [2]

    ——————-
    Agent76 ↑

    America Has Been At War 93% of the Time – 222 Out of 239 Years – Since 1776

    tHAts another popular myth.
    They didnt account for all those covet wars….coups, assasinations, destabilisations, terrorism [cue the UIghurs death squads etc etc], deadly war games….

    Ergo…
    America Has Been At War 100% of the Time since 1776

    FIFY

    ————–
    SB

    The Australian Jewish lobby certainly has the ear of both major parties who when told to jump just ask how high . It’s pretty well acknowledged that their loyalty is to israel but some gentiles are apparently quite OK with this

    Really ?

    FUKUS certainly has the ear of both major parties who when told to jump just ask how high . It’s pretty well acknowledged that their loyalty is to London/Washington but most gentiles are apparently quite OK with this<

    FIFY

    ————-

    America Must Die—So That the People Can Live

    FUS Must Die—So That the world
    can breathe.

    FIFY

    [1]
    https://www.returnofkings.com/180627/writer-jack-london-accurately-predicted-the-rise-of-china

    [2]
    https://web.archive.org/web/20071225210254rn_1/pnews.org/ArT/Xray/EmPire.shtml

    • Thanks: littlereddot
  176. @Reality is Self Related

    LOL,

    Don’t forget the guns. Guns are therapeutic. The make the owner feel real powerful!

  177. I think the title needs to be fixed.

    It should be corporate america needs to die so the american republic can live. Corporate america includes the current political class, all of them.

  178. anon[771] • Disclaimer says:

    More moronic racist fantasies. Did this retard forget that Aztlan is many Hispanic’s country of origin? That’s only one of the many errors in this article. Is this all the White race is capable of? Maybe we already do live in an aristocracy of the best and brightest. The ones who are Chosen for greatness, if you will.

  179. @Anon

    No, it’s post-Scipion’s Carthage. It will be burned down all over. Every God is had adored (Biblical God, Jyaysus, demockracy, multiculturalism…) will be remembered as a demon in the new Pantheon to come. All its works of art, if you dare call that art, will be destroyed like so many voodoo dolls. All languages to come will take a great care not to borrow a single word from what used to be English. Only some technical works about computers, skyscraper controlled demolition or airplane construction will be retained. All other kind of book and film will be erased or burned with utter religious care. I hope there is no hope of a Renaissance for America because America is Carthage’s Renaissance, not Rome’s. Actually Carthage ended up, once everybody was sure that no single object made by former Carthaginians had escaped the thrash fire, quite rapidly 100% rebuilt as a more-Roman-than-Rome city, unilingually Latin like Rome couldn’t be, and Greeker than Alexandria by architecture : Hannibalistic Carthage had looked like old Mecca or Sanaa. If the Scipion to come is to come from China Chinese will be the only urban language while the local crowd and hillbillies working in the fields will be allowed Spanish. If he is a Muslim conqueror it will be classical Arabic for the citizens and Spanish for the dhimmis. Absolutely nobody regretted the blotting out of Carthage and of its culture from the world map, even the Phoenicians that still went on with their trade and cognate language, whereas when Rome fell everybody and especially the Germanic conquerors cried over such a civilization that was being lost, but went on flourishing actually at grassroots level, as the Romance language countries never ceased to be toured and imitated by all.

    • Replies: @Jack McArthur
  180. @anon

    America isn’t too bad a place to live I give you that. The problem is how America relates to the world

    It has 5% of the worlds population and consumes 20% of its resources

    It has an economic system based on taxing the rest of the world. This is through the Petrodollar/reserve currency system, and is enforced my the US military, which is in turn supported by a population wilfully oblivious that this is happening

    It has spent virtually all its existence in war. 239 out 244 years, the last time I checked it up. No other country comes close. Americans don’t realise how militaristic and warlike their country is.

    It says China and Russia are aggressive countries. Yet Russia has 21 and China has 1 overseas military base compared with the US that has upwards of 700.

    The US spends on its military as much as the next 15 countries combined, and that includes its allies.

    The US, refusing to abide by international law, now invents a new term “rules based order”….ie. I make the rules, you follow my orders.

    When foreigners ( I will not speak for the Americans) criticise the USA, it is not because it is a bad place per se, but because while it is so flawed, has no self awareness, zero humility, but instead casts itself as the Shining City on the Hill and saviour of mankind, deeming that others do its will otherwise be sanctioned/bombed “back to the stone age”.

    • Agree: Arthur MacBride
    • Replies: @denk
    , @Anon
  181. Anonymous[228] • Disclaimer says:
    @anon

    A real live shill.

  182. @anon

    America was from day 1 the epitome of an extractive society, with vast expanses of land like the West had never known suddenly being transformed in resource “belts” as they called them : this is the very proof that most of the land and population existed only for extraction’s sake, even though they were then being bribed into the system with high salaries. With the conquest of the Wild West as the one real foundational event you can’t expect any other kind of sequel. The constitution was written to make Europeans dream when French money in particular was badly needed, not to be believed in by Americas. Valuing the US constitution is like valuing Stalin’s constitution for USSR which was indeed the most democratic and humanistic ever in the world. Upward mobility was more important in the Ottoman Empire, to the point the Turks themselves were the rookies in armies where only the riffraff from Italy, Greece, Albania, Syria… could expect to rise one after another and impose their language such as Italian as the one orders were given in to the army. The Ottomans, extractive though they were, never went as far as to call Maghreb the crushed durum belt and Egypt the cane belt.

    • Replies: @anon
  183. Ford says:
    @Mevashir

    Your idea i think is absolutely right. We already have what he described its just that we are the slaves ! They follow no religious morals per say and we have the illusion of voting but they actually have the voting rights with there wealth! Great point

  184. Amarok says:

    Why is it that racist white pukes like the author and his ilk, like to tell people to go back to where they came from; when they are the ones that came in force and murdered, raped and stole from the First Nations?

    Why don’t these interlopers eject themselves from North America first and leave us with the land of our ancestors? Talk is cheap, and the white fathers have spoken with forked tongue for long enough.

    Anyway, the edifice that is the USA is long past due.

  185. denk says:
    @littlereddot

    It has an economic system based on taxing the rest of the world. This is through the Petrodollar/reserve currency system, and is enforced my the US military, which is in turn supported by a population wilfully oblivious that this is happening

    MIC, Big Oil, War street, had their fun,
    its BIg PHarma’s turn now…

    Pfizer reportedly asked governments in Argentina and Brazil to put up sovereign assets, including military bases and federal bank reserves, as collateral for potential future legal costs.

    Although most countries have offered indemnity to vaccine manufacturers in the pandemic, these Latin American government officials felt Pfizer’s demands went beyond those of other companies or the COVAX facility.

    According to government officials in Argentina and the unnamed country, Pfizer asked for liability protection not only against civil claims from citizens who suffer serious adverse events after being vaccinated, but also for cases brought due to Pfizer’s own negligence, fraud or malice. Documents from Brazil’s Ministry of Health suggest that Pfizer made similar demands of the Brazilian government.

    https://www.pharmaceutical-technology.com/news/company-news/pfizer-latin-american-vaccine/

    • Thanks: littlereddot
  186. @ghali

    OMG! You’re talking about Cambodia and Laos: quiet little countries that posed no threat to the US, bombed mercilessly by that “american” Jewish freak Kissinger. Or maybe Korea, Japan, Iraq, Iran, Syria, Palestine, Yemen, Pakistan, and all those other Asian countries attacked by the psychopath USA.

  187. AReply says:

    Proud Boys leader asks for early release over jail conditions | Washington DC
    https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/nov/16/proud-boys-early-release-jail-conditions

    Enrique wishes things were more equal.

    But this whole article by Dalton is a red herring, because “equality”, as in US Constitution, is the observation of a required minimum. IOW equality is the very least of America’s aspirations with the understanding that liberty provides the baseline from which the human spirit can grow, not a proscribing ceiling of advancement. You’ll know the baseline has finally been achieved when there is no struggle needed to reach it, when the minimum is life, liberty and pursuit of happiness, not the guarding of privilege for a few by keeping others down. Want to see a better world, make the bottom a place you wouldn’t mind living and the American Dream is realized. As to white peoples who’ve ended up being eaten by the greed of other whites, welcome to the majesty of God’s divine providence.

  188. Raches: “Never waste your time arguing theology with a Christian. Christian doctrines mean whatever Christians want them to mean; and the whole enterprise is as productive as arguing over Darth Vader’s true intentions towards Luke Skywalker.”

    Well said, and at times I’ve made similar remarks. However, as Professor Oliver observes somewhere, most Christians have never actually read the Bible, and I think it can be useful to showcase their ignorance. Not because it is likely to change their minds, but to advance the cause of stamping out Christian superstitions in the culture generally. Also, I love to vex Christians, if only to see the tortured logic they have to use to justify their absurdities. I doubt if I’ll get any such reward here though. I’m not expecting a reasoned reply from Ann K, because I don’t think she’s given the topic much thought. If she had she wouldn’t have blurted out such obvious nonsense. I suspect she’s one of those non-Bible-reading Christians the professor was referring to.

    Christianity is, as I’ve commented elsewhere, the Swiss Army knife of religions; a technique one can apply to virtually any situation. That’s a large part of the reason it’s been so successful. As you observe, it means whatever its votaries want it to mean, even when those things are diametrically opposed. But something that can mean anything really means nothing at all. Therefore, any “essence” it may appear to have is illusory. Its longevity as a religion is only a testament to the immortal qualities of human stupidity, greed, and hypocrisy.

    • Agree: littlereddot, RVBlake
    • Replies: @Jack McArthur
  189. anon[282] • Disclaimer says:
    @Francis Miville

    Before the civil war, Americans were generally wealthier than the average European (including Englishmen in England) in terms of income and property rights, this can only be because American society wasn’t as extractive to their citizenry in contrast to European and other noneuropean societies. You’re pivoting by mentioning the conquest of the west, the right of conquest is a right given to any conqueror, don’t like it then conquer the land back as the Spaniards did in the reconqiusta. Even with the robber baron thieves America was still the place to live and work in because you can with hard work make something of yourself which wasn’t the case at all for 19th century Ottoman Empire, or England.

    • Agree: HdC
    • Replies: @Francis Miville
  190. anon[410] • Disclaimer says:

    2 recent articles try to sum up the questions and the solutions that the author is trying also to identify, define and solve.

    Two articles in NY Times in Counterpunch :
    https://www.nytimes.com/2021/10/29/opinion/normal-politics-gilded-age.html?searchResultPosition=1 , and the rejoinder to the article by Bacevich https://www.counterpunch.org/2021/11/17/the-last-progressive-biden-and-illusions-of-normalcy/

    touch upon the tumultuous period from 1860 to 1900 or 1920.

    One offers hope because it did not kill then and unlikely to kill now
    Second combs through the reasoning against the current situations and finds the hope unimpressive and unwarranted .

    There were dislocations and disruptions of lives on a much severe scale and scoring much higher than today’s same problems .Racism, poverty, and violence were regular fixtures between 1860 to 1920 and would continue to haunt until 1950.
    Do we have reason to hope that we will be able to act out the old past and reenact our previous existential solutions ? Bacevich looks gloomily and finds no hope nor offers a solution .
    It is interesting that we tend to think that repeat (of turn around) is possible just because we have seen it all before and survived .

    The world was waiting to be picked easily by America in 1900 . American geographical march with bountiful resources to the west was just getting started .
    America survived because rest of the world collapsed or made to collapse by USA .

    This time is different.There is no external weakness, opportunism ,and affection that America can monetize or weaponize . America cant export its internal problmes .America cant import the veneer of some kind of exceptionalism and superiority that can glue the races together at home and hide or suppress the fault lines at home.

    KH

  191. Anon[357] • Disclaimer says:

    Boycott the all ‘elite’ institutions; especially the elite universities. Don’t quote their graduates, academics, nor give them any positive mention among your circle.

    Say something like ‘xYZ used to be a solid school but in the last 30 years it’s really gone downhill. It’s resting on its laurels now’

    Signed a double Ivy; undergrad and professional school. (47 years ago) As an aside, I can tell you very few of my classmates sent their children to their Alma Maters. It’s a unspoken topic that our Alama Maters are to be boycotted.

  192. Mr Anatta says:
    @littlereddot

    No you misunderstand me.

    It is a very little known fact (even in entheogen/psychadelics circles) that these ‘drugs’ are a very powerful meditation tool when one understands the intended teaching ,which is simply ‘without ego/mind’ and to try and learn to meditate without drugs like some do is a complete waste of time and effort.

    As far as i know all drugs are attempting the same thing to various degrees but for most with psychadelics it eventually feels like a mind fuck because they don’t understand that spirit is trying to dissolve the mind into a meditative state but the persons ego/mind fights to survive the often talked about ‘ego death’ due to lack of understanding and that creates a conflict between student and spirit teacher ,where due to that lack of undersanding most never learn and shy away from entheogens as being too much of a mind fuck for them.

    If one smokes very strong weed (called skunk here in U.K)one can learn to meditate without mind but the power is not even close to mushrooms and is vastly inferior but nevertheless skunk can still fuck with the mind a bit of the uneducated student.

    It may be so that we keep on reincarnating ‘just for the chance ‘to have this spiritual understanding and quite possibly at the end level attain Nirvana and end forever the cycle of death and rebirth into the dream that most very wrongly believe is real.

    • Replies: @littlereddot
  193. Anon[982] • Disclaimer says:
    @littlereddot

    So what if 5% of the worlds population consumes 20% of its resources?

    • Replies: @littlereddot
  194. Mr Anatta says:
    @GenFranco

    I don’t favour any race because for one reason I know for a fact that there is no such thing as race to begin with.

    It often hurts some mentioning the truth about their country of birth, due to their somewhat misguided attachment to a place that doesn’t even exist but as they say ,the truth is the truth no matter how painful.

  195. Mr Anatta says:
    @Amarok

    When the Europeans invaded they failed to realise that they were merely pointing their guns at themselves in the mirror,such is the natural law.

    The moral of the story is ‘don’t fuck with the natives and always come with pipes of peace’.

    • Replies: @Amarok
  196. @Anon

    So what if 5% of the worlds population consumes 20% of its resources?

    How generous you are.

    I suppose you are one of those who don’t mind that the small Jewish population of the USA owns a disproportionate amount of wealth and power?

    Your prophet taught you this…..What goes around comes around.

    What you do to the world, returns to you eventually.

    Only he used different terminology: Do unto others what ye would have them do unto you.

    He wasn’t teaching airy fairy moral principles. He was teaching real life laws of nature.

  197. @Mr Anatta

    Thank you, much food for thought.

    I have had a small number of experiences.

    The first blew my mind. After that experience I knew as a certainty that our consciousness is independent of the body, and never feared death since.

    The times I tried weed, I didn’t like it too much. It felt dim, dense and oppressive. A part of the lower astral realm perhaps? Maybe I wasn’t ready for it.

    • Replies: @Mr Anatta
    , @Mr Anatta
  198. Mr Anatta says:
    @littlereddot

    Yeah there really is no point in fearing death because there is no life or self to begin with and that is part of the teaching and why it all gets a bit trippy and well, dream like.

    If you are interested in the proper meditation needed to completely and easily surrender to the plant medicine then adyashanti really gets it with his.’resting as awareness’ meditation and i haven’t looked for years but he did have you tube videos.

    • Thanks: littlereddot
  199. @Anon

    You will see white stupid moron racist doctors reigning and occupying positions that they do not deserve in hospitals like Loyola or Rush or Duke . You see professors at Yale or Harvard or Carnegie Mellon or Pittsburg or university of Michigan who are incompetent but rise because of white ethnicity . In the meme of diversity , minorities are asked to compete against each other and leave the white entitlements intact and enduring

    So your argument is: ”How can you have a white ethnostate without black doctors and engineers?”

  200. Mr Anatta says:
    @littlereddot

    All psychoactive plants try and give a God experience(without ego/mind) and so are all of a higher realm I guess but its just that the experience varies in potency and purity and duration greatly and for example when I tried a high dose Hawaiian baby woodrose seed it felt very potent but it was far more harsh an experience in my brain than mushrooms and another example is salvia divornium which i have taken hundreds of times as chewed leaf years ago of which the peak lasts for far less time than mushrooms and that is why i always recommend mushrooms over others and dimethyl tryptamine(DMT) Is also right up there and basically exactly the same on a molecular level as mushrooms but i much prefer mushrooms as unlike ayahuasca(DMT) there is no heavy body load or potential vomiting from all the plant tannins.

    • Replies: @littlereddot
  201. HR says:

    Dr. Dalton, you undoubtedly propose an improvement upon our current political plight. However, this improvement would necessarily be the fruit of a bloody revolution. Most Northwestern European men and women who live in the U.S. believe in the creeds of either a branch of Christianity or that of Liberalism. Your political program is necessarily against Christianity and Liberalism. You likewise degrade the beliefs of the Founding Fathers and the Church Fathers. In short, your views are radical, extremist, and revolutionary. To implement this program of mass repression and forced conversion would require monarchy which is also known as “tyranny” by republicans of all stripes. An absolute military dictatorship that would kill dissenters and sympathizers would be the only option for the implementation of your plan. Your views are held by a small minority of a disorganized group of fringe thinkers. This group has neither the means nor the will to implement those means. Your account of the corruption of our political system has value, but at present, your plan has none as there is no way to implement the plan within our current context. This appears to be fantasy. Christianity and Liberalism have infected the brains of most all of our Northwestern European kin. Our fathers failed us by embracing these creeds. To lay all the blame at the feet of the Jews would be to evade responsibility for our the past of our folk. White gentiles created our current system. Their creation is now destroying white gentile who are too poor to evade its consequences. The Third Reich will not return in the U.S. unless Liberalism and Christianity are seen for what they are: lies. If you criticize both within dissident right circles, then you will likely receive a poor reaction from your audience. Most conservative or dissident right individuals in the U.S. take these traditions either one or both to be sacred values. Many view Fascism or National Socialism to be the height of all evil. Until you convert your own people to a revolutionary evolutionary ethic, the cause that you espouse will be mere fantasy. It is more important to survive than to overthrow the most powerful empire that has ever existed. Focusing on the latter rather than the former is a form of escapism.

    • Replies: @Rocha
  202. Rocha says:

    Modern democracy was invented on the same day they established the Bank of England so that citizens could not renege the debts contracted in their name by a so-called representative government with private bankers who conjured money out of thin air under the fractional reserve system. You vote to confirm your status as collateral for debt.
    Before the legalization of usury, the refusal to recognize debt was a problem for the money lenders.
    They also introduced income tax so that the government would always have the money to pay the interest on these fictitious debts. Interest that is paid out of the real wealth created by labour.
    They also banned independent goldsmiths from functioning so that their fraudulent paper currency issuing scam would have no competition. The same reason behind 9/11, the invasion of Libya and the assassination of Gadaffi who proposed to mint a new currency based on gold, the dinar.
    Since the establishment of the Bank of England in 1694 , every single war and revolution since then has been to impose this nefarious system on the rest of the world under the cynical guise of promoting democracy.
    The lockdown and covid scam was the means by which the bankers hoped to breathe a little more life into this system which as democracy has enslaved us for 300 years.
    The legalization of usury, the privatization of the issue of the currency and the establishment of central banks were the means by which the usurers acquired all the wealth and power to impose their goal of a New World Order.

    • Agree: Arthur MacBride
  203. There is a huge problem with white nationalists. I am not talking about the fake Zionist agents on this site, but the genuine intelligent ones like Dalton: Why put blacks and the jews, a victim and a victimizer, in the same category? One has terrorized you, robe you all of your power and money, took over all of your institutions, plunged you into disastrous wars,destroyed the moral fabric of your society, and corrupted all of your leaders, and left you crying for help. The other you terrorized, robed them of everything, destroyed their character and humanity, subjugated beyond description, that you left them crying for help.

    If you want to get rid of the victimizer because he terrorized you, why put the victim in the same category with your victimizer? Is it because he reminds you of your guilt and criminality, or the white nationalist can never escape the power of the subliminal message of the master-terrorizer that pushes white nationalists into race-war, rather than liberating the country from the cruelty of the master-hegemon?

  204. Rocha says:
    @HR

    Liberalism is a heresy. The USA will be destroyed because it was founded on the heresy of Liberalism. There are various papal encyclicals condemning Liberalism and more specifically, Americanism.

  205. Erzberger says:
    @Jack McArthur

    “It would take divine intervention of the most spectacular kind to save it and there is no sign of that.“

    Well, there’s Covid.

    Who or what was responsible for the sudden appreciation of hitherto unappreciated contributors to what you call a “harmonious society” – nurses, garbage collectors, truckers, grocery store staff etc etc – all were suddenly subject to standing ovations, and praise for the essential work they do.

    That’s quite an achievement for what many here view as a hoax for the purpose of restricting people’s freedom, or some bioweapon designed for nefarious purposes.

    If climate change is not a signal to curb greed, I don’t know what is. Also declared a hoax, of course, by people who would like to stick with their old ways: greed, capitalism, waste, conspicuous consumption, and who are simultaneously attacking greed and capitalism as sth inflicted on them by a certain tribe of a certain religion. For which they bear no responsibility, and have no other recourse but hoping for divine intervention.

    It’s already here. Cities are burning around the globe. And I am not talking about BLM riots. But go on focus on the latter, much lesser problem. It’s a useful distraction for sticks in the mud.

    • Replies: @Jack McArthur
  206. Miro23 says:
    @The_MasterWang

    A meritocracy is inherently doomed. People who are good at doing their jobs can’t compete with people who are good at installing themselves in high positions. A democracy makes it all the more likely.

    Park Chung Hee came to this conclusion in S. Korea. He initially expected politicians/political parties to align themselves with his national development objectives when they were given back freedom but found that it didn’t work:

    “Political parties activities were permitted to introduce conscientious political activities which enabled conscientious politicians to take steps to take over government. But it was indeed surprising to see their resurgence, their old shape had not changed one bit.

    Old evils were now revived. They had taken a rest, grown fat and become stronger. ”

    “The Country, the Revolution and I” Park Chung Hee, 1962, Hollym Corporation: Publishers, Seoul, Korea

  207. Petr P. says:
    @Amarok

    The arrival of The European settlers in what are today the United States of America and their eventual dispossession of Native Americans of their land is but one of many examples where a people or a nation forcibly take the land of another. Does that make it OK? No – but is it a fairly common ocurrence in human history? Yes.

    That said, they built a civilization on that land. The people whom you speak of as being told by Americans that they should go to where they came from are people who came to America to suck on that civilization’s teet.

    • Replies: @littlereddot
    , @Amarok
  208. “Yes, it was nominally a “Christian nation” at the start, but few among the Founders were deeply religious—Patrick Henry, Samuel Adams, and John Jay being the exceptions—and most were skeptical believers or deists, if not functional atheists.”

    Yes, but the masses were Christian. And more devout than European masses (see “Democracy in America”). This is what sustained a dysfunctional political system such as the one that Founding Fathers created. Once Christianity was gone, the dysfunction of the political system started to manifest in real life.

    “Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.” John Adams.

    A Constitution that is made for moral people is a bad Constitution, because any political system works with a moral people.

    “The knife we are selling was made only to cut soft stuff, such as butter. It is wholly inadequate to the cutting of any other stuff”

    A bad knife, indeed.

    • Replies: @Francis Miville
  209. @anon

    Many Americans were wealthier because of the resources and vast expanses of land made room for a much larger landowning or at least house-owning class. But the structure was extractive nevertheless. Actually, by that time you mention (Civil war and just after) Argentina seemed to do even better, together with Southern Brazil. As soon as the Frontier was closed for lack of space (a process that took time to complete), as soon as land became the scarcer commodity as is the normal condition of all human history, that was it and the American people lost because the illusion of infinite resources during the time of the Frontier, which took a long time to taper out to 100%, people neglected the necessity to develop political consciousness and considered only their own individual fate when dealing with the government however tyrannical.

    You have never been supposed as an American to care for the welfare of the great whole but only for that yourself and your closed ones and maybe your tribe, a mentality which in Europe rather characterizes narco-regions such as Sicily. The sad thing is that when you look carefully at what the Founding Fathers of the original institutions really wanted that was a collection of such egoisms and tribalisms indeed : the checks and balances were there to make sure that power would never escape the clutches of an unnamed but always present patrician class knowing each other, and in particular to prevent any brillant personality from without first to get there second to change the game. This translated into the fact that lobbying was always considered as normal and but rarely called for what it is : corruption. The proof of it is that whenever American influence exerted itself outside the US as a political model to get inspiration from (and not only as an imperial power to get backing from in exchange of goods or treason) it was ALWAYS in the direction of a state growing more and more mafia-oriented through the de facto legalization of corruption : the emerging of the Southern Italian mafia state was a most direct and purposely willed American decision completed during WWII (though prepared from long before) : it has nothing to do with anything specifically Italian or Sicilian.

    • Agree: nokangaroos
  210. @Erzberger

    There is one example from the ancient world in which the ruler of a plague nation confessed that they had been punished because his father had broke a sacred agreement with Egypt. I do not see covid as yet as being a divine act of salvific design because as best I can see it has magnified and rewarded the greed merchants. If it has any divine context then it seems more like leaving this freak show to get on with its own self destruction i.e protection being removed.

    It is not clear if your comments regarding harmonious society is meant as a sarcasm and/or evidence that divine inspiration was at work through an appreciation of the common folk but as always with human beings it can be dire necessity that wakes people up and opens their eyes.

    I do not have an opinion on climate change because I do not know enough about the science behind it. I do know that the fall of the longest(?) lasting era of civilized nation state (Old Kingdom Ancient Egypt) is commonly thought to have been precipitated by climate change. Going much further back the “Cave of Swimmers” evidences a much more dramatic climate change – a change which some think gave birth to Ancient Egypt through migration to the Nile Valley from the once verdant Sahara.

    The meaning of the remainder of your penultimate paragraph is incoherent to me. If you mean the tribe has no responsibility then I have to disagree strongly but if you mean that the concupiscence of each person has a place then I strongly agree. That being said the tribe has controlled the Western media either through ownership or fear so mitigation has surely to allocated to their victims.

    I disagree with you BLM v Climate change analogy. Each are complex enough in their issues without conflation. I loath the former because of its racism/hypocrisy and the latter because I do not know.

    • Replies: @Rocha
  211. @Francis Miville

    “Rome fell everybody and especially the Germanic conquerors cried over such a civilization that was being lost,”

    Only because they had previously exterminated any significant opposition. Would you like some examples from the religious sphere?

  212. @imnobody00

    The US were founded by fundamentally irreligious people, and no less fundamentally immoral people (Washington even if we leave aside the question of slavery was an old miser, a scrooge that needed a new country to rank as a nobleman in ; Jefferson was a radical egoist Jew Soros would have loved to choose as a mentor ; Hamilton was in essence a grafter and a grifter who deprived the veterans having fought for his republic of any single compensation he had promised and mark of gratitude, a like of Henry Kissinger), that on the other hand counted, as was a fundamental tenet of the Enlightenment philosophy they were known to adhere to, on the masses to be fanatically religious and rigorously moral for the republic to remain functional. That is the very essence of Satanism, as well as of the particular school of Judaism Jesus was known to have denounced as the main evil to motivate the emergence of his new religion. That alone proves that 1776 was the acceptance of a collective Satanic pact. As you say it to the point, moral people, even minimally so, even a mere plurality, need no constitution at all. A constitution that asks for a great majority of people to be moral is of evil inspiration and that the particular moral it requires too is evil.

    The US state needs to be abolished, and destroyed military like Carthage was if it refuses. It is more evil in its very principle that the Soviet state was : even though the October Revolution had been a mere foreign-aided military coup, there had been brewing for years if not decades the desire for a particularly revengeful revolution in most of Russia : even though relatively few knew about Bolshevism they were ready to obey any Ivan the Terrible that promised to destroy the aristocracy and the intelligentsia. When it had become clear to all that the Soviet system could only be a lie for eternity, their privileged class dissolved it to preserve their own egoistical interests through privatization. Don’t count on such a relatively wise behaviour from the US elite : they prefer far more gladly the death of the planet and the replacement of their own persons by machines to the death of the US.

    • Troll: Corvinus
  213. @Dr. Robert Morgan

    Reading your recent comments you come across as a fool who thinks he is clever Dr. Dumbass. That you have a minor satan in the miserific hierarchy rushing to agree with you says a lot.

  214. @Anonymous

    “What’s killing the West is capitalism”

    I really did LOL at that fucking nonsense.

    BANKS WHO CAUSE A CRASH DO NOT GET BAILED OUT IN CAPITALISM.

    I am so fucking sick and tired of anyone thinking that what we have is capitalisms.

    We HAVE capital “protectionism” meaning those with the “capital” NEVER LOSE MONEY.

    • Agree: HdC
  215. @Ann K

    Christianity is incarnational but at the same time believing that through an original sin it is spoiled to a degree. Asceticism has always been a side of Christianity that was exercised during the 40 days of lent (just like Jesus in the desert).

    The desert fathers, and the later monastic movement, reflect an extreme whose sacrifice merited graces for others. The Jews called Jesus a drunkard and glutton and in his risen form he very pointedly makes Thomas feel that he was not just a spirit but real flesh. He becomes the new Adam and his mother the new Eve (he calls out on the cross the name Eve had in the Garden)

    When Jesus says that it is better to cast off a limb rather than lose soul it is because the person who fails judgment loses the prospect of becoming a transfigured body. The heresies you allude to negate the body as being evil to it’s core but that was never mainstream.

    • Replies: @Rocha
  216. Rocha says:
    @Jack McArthur

    Manmade climate change was invented by the Canadian communist Maurice Strong to destroy western economies only.
    China, India and Indonesia can build as many coal fired power stations they want to produce cheap electricity and attract industry and nobody says a thing.
    150 years ago, William Jevons, an English economist mapped the relationship between sunspots and the business cycle; more sunspots; a more active sun; warmer weather; better harvests and more money in the economy.
    He was inspired to do so by the observation of William Herschel, astronomer, that during periods of high sunspot activity, the price of wheat fell. The relationship between sunspots and the business cycle was taught in university economics classes in the late seventies, as I can personally attest.
    The Roman period where grapes were grown in Scotland had higher temperatures and so did the Medieval warm period when the Vikings colonised Greenland, to abandon the island in the 14th century when temperatures began to decline.
    In post war Europe the volume of CO2 in the air increased because of post war reconstruction but temperatures declined from 1946 to 76 or thereabouts, so much so that the climate scientists threatened us with a new Ice Age.
    CO2 at 0,04% of atmospheric gases has no effect on climate whatsoever.

    • Replies: @Mulga Mumblebrain
  217. anon[271] • Disclaimer says:
    @Mevashir

    So dream of Hitler and a mythical pure Aryan race as you enjoy your degraded slave status!

    Well, you certainly dream of a mythical Holocaust as you enjoy the fictional “degradation” of a concocted victim status. My suspicion is that you harbor resentment for Mr. Dalton for blaspheming this dogma that you hold so dear and sacred.

  218. Rocha says:
    @Jack McArthur

    The Catholic Faith is the only Faith which teaches the dogma that God created a good world. All other religions are gnostic to a greater ar lesser degree. The so-called traditional Catholics with their Puritanism and apocalyptic obsessions don’t seem to have heard of this dogma. Hilaire Beloc. The Great Heresie

    • Replies: @Jack McArthur
  219. @Anon

    What is unregulated capitalism?

    Regulated capitalism allows private property so that a person is not dependent on an evil regime which exploits their absolute dependence as the Jews did to Christian Russia. It allows one person to support a family and provide for its education, health care and old age. It allows adequate time for rest, recreation and a spiritual life. It prevents the destruction of culture through control of who owns the media. I am sure you can think of much more. Even countries which ostensibly have laws limiting monopoly have now been ruined by the buying of the “peoples representatives”.

    • Replies: @Rocha
    , @Mulga Mumblebrain
  220. @Rocha

    Yes the bible does say that the world was made good but it also states that it is fallen therefore that has been the constant teaching of mainstream Christianity. There is a pre Christian era text from Ancient Egypt that refers to a golden era with no suffering and most certainly it is incarnational – it never went away.

  221. Rocha says:

    You obviously don’t understand what a dogma in the Catholic faith is; something that cannot be denied or you are a heretic! The Catholic Faith was the only Christian Faith in western Europe for 1,500 years. There is only one Christian Faith and that is the Catholic one. If you are interested there is nothing better to read on the importance of Dogma that the Commonitory by St Vincent of Lerins. Unfortunately, most Catholics too don’t understand the importance of Dogma that is why Vatican II happened.

    • Replies: @Anon
  222. @Anonymous

    Agree with you 100%.
    In the USA God is green and the messenger is Greed. So the officials in the US are wide open to to become corrupted by the Zio-money. Once the nation becomes a complete failure then the Zio’s will pack up and go to the next place. They have been doing this for thousands of years and that is the reason for being named “homeless wanderers”

  223. Rocha says:
    @Jack McArthur

    capitalism is state sponsored usury. All our problems arise from the legalization of usury at the Protestant Reformation and the privatization of the issue of the currency with the setting up of the Bank of England. Czar Alexander the grandfather of Nicholas categorically confirmed that he would never allow a central bank on Russian soil. Probably the reason for the Russian revolution was to kill off the monarchy as an impediment to the goal of a central bank.

  224. The real enemy of the American people, and humanity in general, is the US Empire. Get rid of that, of the hypertrophied military-industrial money-burning machine, the one thousand overseas bases, the scores of bio-warfare labs scattered around the globe and the weapons of economic coercion, sabotage and subversion, and Americans would have several trillion a year to build a decent society, unlike the hideous dystopia that now exists and sits like a incubus on the back of humanity.

  225. @Jack McArthur

    To speak of ‘regulated capitalism’ is akin to speaking of ‘benevolent cancer’. Capitalism is a cancer, insatiable in its greed, lust to grow infinitely, its destructiveness and total indifference to the harm, ending in death, that it causes. Any attempts to ameliorate capitalism were only made out of fear of socialism, and when that spectre evaporated, capitalism returned to its innate, unchangeable, all-consuming true nature.

  226. Anon[357] • Disclaimer says:
    @Rocha

    The Orthodox Christians might suggest they hold true to the orginal faith 🙂

  227. @Rocha

    One never tires of the loathsome antics of the Dunning-Kruger imbeciles. Just why and how trace amounts of CO2 and methane, nitrous oxide and other man-made greenhouse gases trap heat in the Earth system was established by science long ago. The science is as confirmed as any other. But you moronic know-it-alls, simply reject it, out of that old familiar hybrid of pig ignorance, ideological fanaticism and utterly unmerited arrogance.
    Sunspots indicate the level of solar activity, and solar activity is the great driver of global climate, BUT it is NOT the only driver of climate. Is that really too much for your giant brain to comprehend, that without the heat-trapping effects of greenhouse gases we would be so cold that organised civilization would be impossible?
    As for the fall in temperatures after WW2, that is generally put down to the particulate smogs in the then still industrialised West raising the planet’s albedo, thus reflecting solar radiation. Once the greenhouse effects of the greatest forcing of such gases in the atmosphere for 55 million years, since the PETM, overpowered that effect, now caused by industry in East Asia and South Asia mostly, the global temperature has rapidly escalated. And if Asia reduces its smogs, and their ‘global dimming’ impact, another degree or so, Celsius, is baked in already, sealing our fate.
    All the warmest recorded years in history have occurred since 1998, and the increase is accelerating, and is seen in greater weather extremes, melting ice-caps and glaciers, the spread of pests and diseases, ocean warming and thermal expansion, etc. You’re flogging a dead denialist horse, Dunning.

  228. Johan says:

    The comments on this article, comments on media being a democratic hobby… in so far as I took the trouble to dig through that mess… confirm the philosophy of the article. Basically the commenters are unable to stick to the topic and its essence, dragging all their individual and non relevant obsessions in it, so that we end up with a Babylonic confusion, or should we say: a Democratic confusion.

    To add some comments on democracy from non mediocres, to make the reading of the comment section worthwhile:

    High hopes were once formed of democracy; but democracy means simply the bludgeoning of the people by the people for the people. It has been found out. I must say that it was high time, for all authority is quite degrading. It degrades those who exercise it, and degrades those over whom it is exercised. When it is violently, grossly, and cruelly used, it produces a good effect, by creating, or at any rate bringing out, the spirit of revolt and Individualism that is to kill it. When it is used with a certain amount of kindness, and accompanied by prizes and rewards, it is dreadfully demoralising. People, in that case, are less conscious of the horrible pressure that is being put on them, and so go through their lives in a sort of coarse comfort, like petted animals, without ever realising that they are probably thinking other people’s thoughts, living by other people’s standards, wearing practically what one may call other people’s second-hand clothes, and never being themselves for a single moment. (Oscar Wilde)

    But alas! the rising tide of democracy, which spreads everywhere and reduces everything to the same level, is daily carrying away these last champions of human pride, and submerging, in the waters of oblivion, the last traces of these remarkable myrmidons. (Baudelaire)

    Contemporary conspiracy theories:

    When a democracy which is thirsting for freedom has evil cupbearers presiding over the feast, and has drunk too deeply of the strong wine of freedom, then, unless her rulers are very amenable and give a plentiful draught, she calls them to account and punishes them, and says that they are cursed oligarchs. (Plato – The Republic)

    Anti-culture mob rule of democracy:

    There is this to be said in favour of the despot, that he, being an individual, may have culture, while the mob, being a monster, has none. One who is an Emperor and King may stoop down to pick up a brush for a painter, but when the democracy stoops down it is merely to throw mud. (Oscar Wilde)

    Hey, an American..:

    Democracy is a pathetic belief in the collective wisdom of individual ignorance. ( Henry Louis Mencken)

    Democracy, will soon degenerate into an anarchy, such an anarchy that every man will do what is right in his own eyes, and no man’s life or property or reputation or liberty will be secure and every one of these will soon mold itself into a system of subordination of all the moral virtues, and intellectual abilities, all the powers of wealth, beauty, wit, and science, to the wanton pleasures, the capricious will, and the execrable cruelty of one or a very few. (John Adams)

    The more equal the conditions of men become, the less strong men individually are, the more easily do they give way to the current of the multitude, and the more difficult is it for them to adhere by themselves to an opinion which the multitude discard. A newspaper represents an association; it may be said to address each of its readers in the name of all the others, and to exert its influence over them in proportion to their individual weakness. The power of the newspaper press must therefore increase as the social conditions and cultural values of men become more equal. (Alexis de Tocqueville)

    I could go on for an hour quoting highly intelligent men.

    Aristotle by the way did not hold a high opinion of democracy (a formulation which is a euphemism), therefor he suggested, when it is unavoidable in times of decline, the foremost you should do is to limit the amount of politicians and the whole bureaucratic apparatus, in order to safeguard some freedom. Our modern democracies are hyper regulated though without historical precedent, consisting of armies of ambitious workaholic politicians, add to that armies of bureaucrats. Even dictatorships know and have known no such hyper regulation, and, worst of all, ubiquitous soft pressure.

    The above will of course be over-shouted by more mediocre wiseacre commenters who urgently feel the need to express their mental farts:

    • Replies: @Mulga Mumblebrain
  229. GeneralRipper [AKA "Antaeus"] says:

    The three cornerstones of Western Civilization.

    #1 Religion

    #2 Family

    #3 Private Property

    • Replies: @anon
    , @GomezAdddams
  230. Corvinus says:
    @The Anti-Gnostic

    As I suspected, you choose to be silly rather than serious.

  231. anon[272] • Disclaimer says:
    @GeneralRipper

    But that’s been the cornerstone of all societies from the Neolithic to the early 20th century,

    • Replies: @GeneralRipper
  232. GeneralRipper [AKA "KoolDiscoDan"] says:
    @anon

    But that’s been the cornerstone of all societies from the Neolithic to the early 20th century,

    Except for the human sacrifice, the polygamy and Demon worship…yeah.

    • Replies: @anon
  233. von Frey says:
    @Jeffrey A Freeman

    Man was created by God to love and worship…God.

    I’m honestly not trying to troll you, but this god of yours needs to do more if he wants anyone’s love and worship. He reminds me of an average looking woman who can’t cook, never cleans house, has a ton of opinions on literally everything, is mediocre in bed and yet somehow believes that she brings something to the table.

    To put it another way, assuming we were indeed “created” by this entity, what exactly has he done to merit our devotion since?

    If you (or anyone) can answer that question without appeals to writ and undue emotionalism, I will be surprised. In fact, I hesitate to even ask the questions because I know that the only replies will consist entirely of verses and venom.

    • Replies: @Marcion
  234. Exile says:
    @Goddard

    All of these are good and necessary steps.

    Do we have the time and social space left to do them without some kind of “redoubt” though?

    It’s past time that White people started building parallel communities that go their own way for White interests. Worry about the formalities later.

    You need a supporting tribe around you to make having a family and raising non-brainwashed kids easier.

  235. anon[272] • Disclaimer says:
    @GeneralRipper

    Demon worship? Early Neolithic societies worshipped their ancestors and the sun. The demon worship (Venus) and child sacrifices were apparent in fully degenerated sexualized societies that were eventually destroyed as this society shall be destroyed for the satanism and child rape/blood drinking.

    • Replies: @GeneralRipper
  236. Johan says:

    Huxley had it exactly right: support for modern democracy is in fact more of a belief system, or even a faith, than something grounded in history, reason, and philosophy.

    There is no philosophical rational argument in favour of the equality idea, it is based on psychology, based on envy. Envy is the psychological fundament of democracy. Be it the envy of fools, the envy of the ignorant, or the refined envy of those who are way more intelligent than the masses. Hence, the superior are everywhere attacked and kept down by the envious, be it openly demonstrated brutal envy, or subtle refined forms of envy. That is, if they even have a voice or podium, which is very very rare.
    Democratic culture is one GRAND CENSOR system of ubiquitous soft oppression, exclusion and decline, in the case of modern democracies, without historical precedent. The payment is and will continue to be the dumbing down of about the whole of humanity, as hardly anyone can escape the situation fully.
    It is obvious that there are various elite parties who benefit from this mass scale dumbing down. They keep their ranks closed, and they take care to breed intelligent offspring by providing them with favourable conditions, as they are in positions of wealth and power which makes this possible, while the rest of the world is ever more composed of dumb-phone, screen, consumerist and pop-trend-hype-sensation culture zombies.

    • Agree: Marcion
  237. Nancy says:
    @HdC

    I agree with money out of politics (a hopeless goal, but we can try), and meritocracy, as long as ‘merit’ includes character, compassion, cooperation, etc, else we will get Gates, Yellen, Adelson, Buffet, Raft, et al as the epitomes of business acumen.
    And “political appointees and those in positions due to who the know or are related to, will foul up the best operating systems”, au contraire, the Termite Tribe that strictly operates according to who one knows, is married or related to, nepotism, etc. has been unbelievably successful in achieving it’s aims. Unfortunately, those aims do not include the enhancement of the general welfare.
    Too many ascribe to the “Greed is good” moral code, to the exclusion of all but profit ….maximization.

  238. GeneralRipper [AKA "KoolDiscoDan"] says:
    @anon

    Viva Christo Rey!

  239. Marcion says:
    @von Frey

    A fair, no, excellent question.

    It is reasonable to think that religion is mainly garbage because it is. Mainly. When the first English translator of Tao teh Ching, Legge I believe, translated the word Tao he used the word ‘God.’ There are schools that specialize in answering questions such as your’s. It is no wonder most religion makes little sense. Keyword tip for your topic: dharmakaya, dharmadatu, svabhavikakaya, Tao, All Good One, advaita, Great Perfection/Dzogchen. Start there.

    • Thanks: von Frey
  240. Johan says:

    Greek democracy was thus a racial (White European), ethnic (Athenian), and gendered (men only) system of rule. And it worked incredibly well; it produced and sustained the brilliant Athenian culture that we know today.

    The writer is misinformed here, Socrates was put to death, Plato had to hide behind the dead Socrates, using him as his mouthpiece. The Republic is a veiled criticism of democracy, an open criticism could have cost him his life or freedom. The small clan of great people who’s heritage we can enjoy today were all at some point in danger because of the intolerant Athenian mob rule system. The Athenian democracy was based upon envy, mob rule, and demagogy, just as our democracies are, the fact that this democracy was limited makes no difference in terms of its basic character of mob rule, mediocrity and all that comes with it…
    These where also the days of the sophists, just as in our days we have an explosion of sophists. During Athenian democracy sophism got its highly negative connotation.. (think about that..).
    Conservative democratic Athens executed Socrates because they mistakenly thought he was a sophist, they took him for what in our times is called a ‘progressive’, hence, democratic Athens was subject to the same ‘progressive’ destructive forces as we are today, and the same conservative/progressive struggle.

    The writer in his view on democratic Athens is subject to refined democratic falsification of history, democratic propaganda. This is no wonder though, everyone is spoon fed with democratic rewriting and propaganda from birth. The democratic brainwashing is so almighty and pervasive that you might need several lifetimes so to speak to recover from its falsifications, delusions and illusions.

    • Agree: HdC
    • Replies: @Mulga Mumblebrain
  241. @Mr Anatta

    Hawaiian baby woodrose seed

    I tried a low dose, 2 seeds i think. I found it gave strong mental focus or concentration, also a little more intuition came through. Unfortunately I had to lie flat on my bathroom floor because I got all woozy and nauseous…LOL

    The others I will try them as you suggest. But being where I am, I have to be extremely careful as the laws here are very harsh. Fortunately many substances here are not listed on the prohibited substances schedules/statutes so I will have to research a little bit more.

    Also I suppose when normal travel resumes I might make a trip someplace where I can get them more easily and where they are legal.

    Thanks for the tips!

    • Replies: @Mulga Mumblebrain
  242. @The_MasterWang

    People who are good at doing their jobs can’t compete with people who are good at installing themselves in high positions.

    From what I can tell about the current state of government in the collective West, is that the job of the politician IS to install themselves in high positions.

  243. Phoenix says:

    Thank you for an outstanding reality-based analysis of the condition of US democracy and how to go forward from here.

    “all men are created equal” – an unfortunate choice of words in the Declaration of Independence.

  244. @Petr P.

    That said, they built a civilization on that land. The people whom you speak of as being told by Americans that they should go to where they came from are people who came to America to suck on that civilization’s teet.

    Unfortunately the milk in that teet was stolen from the Red Man.

    It is like when a farmer takes a cart of milk cans to market but it topples over. There are people up and down the street and they notice the mishap. The first guy to get there kicks the farmer away and claims the milk cans. He turns makes nice beautiful row of milk cans on the ground admiring his loot. But when the rest of onlookers reach there, hoping to get some, he tells them to “get away, this is my beautiful row of milk cans which I made. You go back to where you came from, you parasites!”.

    Both the late comers and the first guy quarrel over themselves. Meanwhile the farmer is ignored.

    • Replies: @Luus Kanin
  245. @William Gruff

    Interesting thoughts, you might be onto something.

  246. @littlereddot

    You seem to have unfortunately unremembered something about the milk, namely the cow. Oh, that’s right, Native Americans didn’t own any cows until Columbus brought them.

    • Replies: @littlereddot
  247. Jon Chance says: • Website
    @where_are_the_bones

    Jews and Israelis are National Socialists.

    Does the solution to a problem consist of replicating the problem?

    Adolf Hitler:  Evil Genius or Useful Idiot? 

    Thirteen Strategic “Blunders” 

    [MORE]

    1 – Hitler admired and emulated the British Empire. 

    2 – Hitler obstructed German development of nuclear technology. 

    3 – Hitler declared war on the US rather than recruiting America as an ally with Germany, Spain, Italy, Romania, Greece, Finland, Sweden, Norway, Switzerland, and other anti-Communist nations. 

    4 – Hitler failed to recruit Japan in the war against the USSR. 

    5 – Hitler obstructed German capture of the British Army at Dunkirk. 

    6 – Hitler obstructed German production of jet fighters essential for effective defense against the UK’s bombings of Europe. 

    7 – Hitler obstructed German targeting of the UK’s military targets during the Battle of Britain. 

    8 – Hitler obstructed Germany’s liberation of Ireland, Scotland, Wales and England from the UK. 

    9 – Hitler obstructed Axis supply of fuel to General Rommel’s panzers in North Africa. 

    10 – Hitler diverted Germany’s Eastern divisions to Leningrad and Stalingrad, thus obstructing Germany from capturing Moscow and liberating Eastern Europe from the Communists. 

    11 – Hitler obstructed the continued deportation of Jews to Palestine (after 1941). 

    12 – Hitler nationalized Germany’s central bank, but he neglected to prohibit fractional-reserve banking. 

    13 – Hitler obstructed competent alternatives from leading Germany in its defense against Communism and the Franco-British Empires. 

    As a result of Hitler’s incompetence, over sixty million (60,000,000) Gentiles were brutally slaughtered by Khazarian-ruled puppet regimes.

    At a minimum, Adolf Hitler and the German National Socialists (Nazis) were useful idiots for Germany’s strategic opponents (Royal Dutch Shell, the French Empire, the Rothschild Dynasty & the Bank of England). 

    But it’s entirely possible that Adolf Hitler and other National Socialists were willing and intentional puppets and agents for the defeat of Germany by the UK, the USSR, and the World Zionist Organization (WZO), is it not? 

    The Greatest Story Never Told (2013) – Dennis Wise 

    https://TheGreatestStoryNeverTold.tv

    Inside the Third Reich (1970) – Albert Speer 

    https://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B0006D5SBC  

    http://TheMoneyMasters.Com

    https://HenryGeorge.Org

    https://Libertarian.Org

    • Replies: @HdC
  248. HdC says:
    @Jon Chance

    On the surface it may appear true what you assert…
    Operative phrase: On the surface…
    For example, the USA navy waged war on German shipping on the Atlantic plus aiding and abetting Britain at the same time. All this was occurring while the USA was officially NEUTRAL!
    In order to fight back effectively Germany had no choice to declare war on the USA so that from the German legal perspective Hitler could order the German navy to attack USA shipping and naval vessels.
    I certainly could make similar extenuating arguments for all other points you have raised.
    If you have a globe handy, examine it to see what Germany was up against when looking at the land mass of the USA, Soviet Union, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, etc., along with its population advantage of perhaps 5 or 6 to 1, to say nothing of the natural resources.
    I do agree, however, that the German military should have turned the beaches of Dunkirk, during the British retreat, into hamburger. This would have had, probably, a much greater influence on Britain suing for peace.
    That it took 6 years for the combined forces of the above, plus the original instigators France and Britain, 6 long years to defeat a small European country is unbelievable! What a people! What a country!

    • Replies: @Jon Chance
  249. Jon Chance says: • Website
    @HdC

    Having created and manipulated the Soviet Union, the CCP, the Nazis, the UN, the EU, NATO, the Theocracy of Israel, Islamic Jihad, and other transnational terrorist organizations, the Synagogue of Satan has succeeded at enslaving most nations to perpetual world war, socialism, and “public debt”.

    Please examine George Orwell (1984) and the full public disclosure of Benjamin Freedman (1961).

    What’s the best solution?

  250. Beamter says:

    Among a plethora of obvious attempts by federal intelligence agencies to track “white nationalists,” Unz.com is quite obvious; and the writings of Thomas Dalton are the most obvious. Can a political movement which is opposed by the nation’s military gather any steam? No, but this will not stop our “Nazi-hunting” fanatical government from pouring water on the least spark of nationalist sentiment. What a sad country, and what a sadder state of the world when political change has been rendered impossible by this regime of total surveillance!

    • Replies: @Exile
  251. @littlereddot

    I grew it once, and the monster vine covered the back of our terrace house quickly, but only produced a few yellow flowers, of the morning glory type (Ipomoea). No seeds, so I’ve stuck to the bright blue, and white, evening opening, types since.

    • Replies: @littlereddot
  252. @Johan

    You don’t have to be a Plato or Socrates to see that mass ‘democrazy’ in a capitalist economy is a catastrophe. You need only have lived in Australia since 1972, and seen the cavalcade of buffoons, racists, religious fascists, imbeciles, and psychopaths that it throws up as leaders. And the increasing malevolence of the regimes that have misruled this failed dystopia.

    • Replies: @GomezAdddams
  253. @Johan

    The living exemplar of a superior system to ‘representative democrazy’ in a capitalist State where ALL real power belongs to the rich owners of that economy, is China, which is why the parasites hate it so very much.

    • Replies: @Johan
  254. @Dr. Robert Morgan

    Keep the commandments and LOVE your neighbour as yourself? You still Lack one thing —“go sell everything you have –give these proceeds to the poor and then and come follow ME” —( the young rich man—turned the offer down). Same today as yesteryear when Christ spoke –Many will NOT qualify yet proclaim they are Christian…. Truth. Find the narrow gate ————–the big gate leads to perdition ?? Many in those days will claim that they are Christian BUT —still fail the judgement –I was hungry and you did what ?? ( think Iraq-Afghanistan- Libya- Syria)—I was naked and you did what ( Iraq- Afghanistan- Belarus border with Poland) I was in jail and you did what ( Bradley Manning – et al)————perhaps a resounding Zero. However –“Thing” is atheist and “Lurch” is Lutheran with Martin Luger ( second amendent revision) and regular attender at NRA Meetings weekdays and church sevices Sunday—claims he often falls asleep during those Sunday sessions —nothing but stories —long ago stories –with no real meaning….

  255. @GeneralRipper

    Read Book of Acts —-Chapter 4 —-couple was to sell land ( all of it) and lay the cash down to the cingregation ( collective assembly of believers) ALL land held in common but this couple kept back part of the proceeds and both died —Lying to Spirit ( that they retained part of the sale price –for themselves = Private Property???) It is in the Bible and to arge this is what Satan enjoys —

  256. @Mulga Mumblebrain

    Scottie Morrison is one the best wombats to arrive in a long long time—to save Austailier. Now–Scottie is going to tag team with Canada to send 30,000 coal miners to dig that fuel and Canada benefits by building Fosters brewery to keep these Luke and Butch types ( Bushwhackers – earlier Sheepherders) tanked so they can slide off the mountain tops with those 80 ton bulldozers but land safely in the valley and market this coal back to Australia so Australia can build big boats —bigger than Noah’s ark and both countries will become rich—- Build Jobs for Australier —–Scottie’s Vision…

  257. @Luus Kanin

    So whats your point? You didn’t have potatoes before “Columbus” found them.

    You only remember what the whites gave the world. You forget what they received

    • Replies: @Luus Kanin
  258. @Mulga Mumblebrain

    Did you have any good experiences ingesting it? LOL

    • Replies: @Mulga Mumblebrain
  259. Johan says:

    Discard the pernicious concept of human equality and replace it by a celebration of the higher, the nobler, and the best. (d) Replace industrial democracy with something like an aristocracy.

    A long running democracy destroys and erodes culture, hence, to breed and build a new culture of excellence after such a long time of democracy will take a long time, decades, probably more than half a century.

    As of the democratic people themselves, they need to be convinced that they are not free, that they are subject to their own system which is a system of hyper regulation and control. They are not citizens and persons, but numbers in statistics of their own government and organizations. Foremost they need to be brought to reflection that it is their own system which makes them slaves. They are hyper managed, individually disempowered and need to take back control on the local and individual level, they need to restore their craftmanship (which is their work honour), get rid of the manager class, get rid of the armies of bureaucrats who control their lives and environment. They need to get rid of big government, get rid of all those laws and regulations which makes things rigid. Etc. They themselves have all worked at building monsters, the big government, the media etc. They need to stop blaming elites too, they need to learn to depend on themselves and their small circle. To take things in their own hand, instead of to organize themselves and so to create a monstrous government, bureaucratic apparatus and a monstrous media.

    When the democratic people stop feeding their own tyrannical monsters (governments, bureaucracies, and whatever organizations), when the tyranny of mediocrity becomes less, there will be more room to breed excellence. Meanwhile special schools need to be instituted, schools where people are free from the degrading all eroding democratic culture. These schools need to be without interference of institutions and government. Schools which do not engage in brainwashing or teaching all kinds of stuff people don’t need, they need to be schools where people learn to think for themselves.

    The line below in Plato’s Republic points to the tendency of democracies to regulate and manage everything, which stifles and kills cultural, collective and individual progress.

    And without divine help, said Adeimantus, they will go on for ever making and mending their laws and their lives in the hope of attaining perfection. Plato – The Republic

  260. Johan says:
    @Mulga Mumblebrain

    China and the Western world are both heading towards a collectivist control system, governed top down by an elite and powerful organizations. These Western and Chinese elites will in time likely become friendly with each other, in order to collaborate. How many US global corporations are at this time even friendly with the Chinese? They want the US (as a culture and nation) to die too…

    • Replies: @Mulga Mumblebrain
  261. @littlereddot

    Fond greetings from the west! I did not take kindly to your quote, “Unfortunately the milk from that teet was stolen from the red man.” It seemed to me that you went and got a bee in your bonnet so then decided to make a pungent proclamation of simplistic proportion. You then followed up your reference of Native Americans with your saga of sour milk. I have had dealings with cows and natives, so am not so easily swayed by the everything was stolen from the noble red man argument. I simply mentioned you forgot about the cow to remind you that blanket statements don’t always cover up inconvenient facts and that one way streets can still be negotiated in an opposite direction.
    In the future, I would suggest not building a house of straw in a windy area, so that the first fool that comes along can blow it over.

    • Replies: @littlereddot
  262. @Luus Kanin

    In the future, I would suggest not building a house of straw in a windy area, so that the first fool that comes along can blow it over

    Indeed a fool tried to blow it over. Unfortunately the straw house was a figment of the fools imagination.

    What have I written that was incorrect? Pray tell.

    • Replies: @Luus Kanin
  263. Exile says:
    @Beamter

    We need a comment option for “glowie.”

    The only thing that’s “obvious” is that you are a hasbarista.

    • Replies: @HdC
  264. HdC says:
    @Exile

    On what information do you base your assertion? Or, how do you arrive at your conclusion based on what the poster has written?

  265. Mevashir says: • Website
    @Amarok

    You are absolutely correct. Not only did they steal the land of the Native Americans and repeatedly break solemn treaties, but they kidnapped and imported by force black Africans that they now complain don’t have a right to live here!

    Whites are experts at playing the victim card and blaming others for their own moral failings.

  266. @Mevashir

    Whites are experts at playing the victim card and blaming others for their own moral failings.

    Remind us of which Jewish texts the religious wing relied on from the OT and who claimed Columbus was like you i.e. a pretend Christian?

    • Replies: @anon
  267. anonymous[117] • Disclaimer says:
    @Mevashir

    Whites are experts at playing the victim card and blaming others for their own moral failings.

    Nobody “plays the victim card” better than your Tribe, who played a large role (if not the dominant role) in importing those black slaves of whom you speak.

    • Agree: HdC
  268. anon[117] • Disclaimer says:
    @Jack McArthur

    A pretend Christian indeed. The most bad faith actor on UR. And he only invokes Christianity to counter-signal perceived “Nazis” or people like Thomas Dalton, whom he obviously despises for expertly debunking the standard Holocaust narrative. Funny how his type can’t just be forthright and honest about disliking people for their perceived anti-Semitism or Nazism. They have to resort to such deceits because calling people anti-Semites point blank would betray their totally ethnocentric worldview. For the vast majority of people, the world doesn’t revolve around the interests of his extremist ultranationalist faction of the Tribe, and the charge of “anti-Semitism” simply doesn’t carry much weight, especially on UR. Hence, he must denigrate people like Thomas Dalton under some guise that lends him a measure of intellectual respectability so that he’s not exposed for being the bad-faith actor that he really is. And he has to couch his racially-motivated attacks against others in a manner that would make them appear to be universal and valid for everyone, not merely the narrow-minded grievances of a butthurt wannabe rabbi.

  269. @littlereddot

    I indeed admitted that I was a fool, because I knew it was a fool’s errand to attempt to get an unreasonable person to understand that the quote “unfortunately the milk from the teet was stolen from the red man” was silly and foolish, something a grade schooler addicted to MSNBC would parrot. The land was not stolen from the red man. There wasn’t a red man to steal it from, there were hundreds of separate tribes living on the land, competing, killing each other, and stealing the land from each other, by using violence and force to take and keep it. There were occasions that the U.S. government stole land, and there were other times where they bought it from tribes that owned it, tribes that took that land by killing the previous occupants of it. All land has been taken by conquest. The U.S. government still pays Native Americans for being Native Americans. I sure would wish that thief that stole my radio sometime around 1980 had been making a monthly payment to me since then.
    This is much too complex and convoluted for you to understand, that is why I admitted I was a fool to begin with. I hold no animosity toward you, I just think it is time to call it a day. I would suggest occasionally changing the channel from MSNBC and finding an old episode of Captain Kangaroo to watch, it will be much more educational and help with your manners also. Vaya con dios mi amigo/a.

    • Replies: @littlereddot
  270. @Amarok

    May the Native Americans one day get their lands back.

    However, when that happens deporting all the interlopers would be impractical and unlikely. What I see might be more possible is that they become legal owners of the land again. Several things might happen:

    1. Native Americans are recognised as legal owners of the lands leading to the following changes (not in chronological or logical order)

    2. A new house is created in Congress….lets call it the Council of Elders. It sits above the Senate and has the power to veto both of the lower houses

    3. A new office is created above the POTUS….lets call it The Great Chief. It is a ceremonial role, perhaps like the Queen of England. However The Great Chief has the power to dismiss and appoint the POTUS.

    4. A new highest court is created above the Supreme Court….Lets call it the Council of Elder Judges. It doesn’t have to be populated by ethnic Native Americans, but its members are appointed by that community.

    5. The USA is dissolved and a new nation is created…Lets call it New USA or NUSA

    6. To become citizens of NUSA, all non native peoples agree to live within the new laws of NUSA, which is in turn largely derived from those of the USA; at least for a start.

    7. All land ownership arrangements stay effectively the same except that the Native American tribes collectively are recognised as the ultimate owners of the land. As such a portion of NUSA national tax revenues are paid as rent to the tribes.

    This is just off the top of my head. Many permutations of solutions can be reached. But the purpose of such a speculation is simply to show that the stolen lands can be returned to the Native Americans without too much disruption to the existing paradigm.

    If only the interlopers had the moral courage to do so.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    , @anonymous
    , @Amarok
  271. @Luus Kanin

    There wasn’t a red man to steal it from, there were hundreds of separate tribes living on the land,

    Why do choose to be so literal? Red Man is used as generic racial term as loosely as White or Black or Yellow.

    There were occasions that the U.S. government stole land, and there were other times where they bought it from tribes that owned it, tribes that took that land by killing the previous occupants of it.

    Those lands that were sold of their own free will is not the fault of the colonisers.
    However treaties forced on the native peoples at GUNPOINT, and treaties that were repeatedly made then broken by the colonisers are their fault.
    You know as well as I do, that the VAST MAJORITY of lands acquired by the USA were from the latter and not the former situation.

    The U.S. government still pays Native Americans for being Native Americans

    So a strong man steals a weak mans car worth \$10K, and pays him \$1, then says “look I have paid you for the car. So it is mine”.

    The truth is simple. The lands were stolen.

    No amount of obfuscating it as “complex” will change that.

    You have already decided a conclusion based on emotion, and now select facts and arguments to support it. This kind of thinking is rampant in the USA, and is in essence why the USA is now imploding.

    • Replies: @Anon
    , @Luus Kanin
  272. Anonymous[934] • Disclaimer says:
    @littlereddot

    Never. Going. To. Happen.

    It’s ours forever.

  273. Anon[830] • Disclaimer says:
    @littlereddot

    It’s OK to steal land. The desert volcano god says so. Just ask the Israelis

    • LOL: littlereddot
  274. S says:

    One thing’s certain about the Euro past and present, both in it’s good and bad, if at least some elements of the various Euro tribes don’t pull themselves together individually and, or, corporately:

    ‘All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain…’

  275. anonymous[247] • Disclaimer says:
    @littlereddot

    is that you Nathan Philips?

    • Replies: @littlereddot
  276. @littlereddot

    Littlereddot I believe you are being deliberately obtuse. “The truth is simple. The lands were stolen.” A simpleton conclusion based completely on emotion without rational reasoning. How do you reconcile the fact that land that was supposedly stolen from the red man had been stolen by the red man previously? Did not the Comanches steal vast amounts of land from numerous other tribes, such as the Blackfeet, Kiowas, Pawnees, Apaches, etc by killing them off and driving them from their land? This is just an example that repeated itself over and over, a stronger group taking land from a weaker group by conquest. Who owned the land before the so called Native Americans? The Clovis people were supposedly the first people who owned the land. Now sites have been discovered that appear to be pre-Clovis. Who stole the land from them?
    I see that you used the word “obfuscating” in a sentence. I heard Mr. Green Jeans use the word once while speaking with Mr. Moose, so I am happy to see you are taking your studies seriously!

    • Replies: @Mr Anatta
    , @littlereddot
  277. Amarok says:
    @Petr P.

    To dump free loaders, yes. However, how much have the present generations of whites been free loaders as well, sucking on civilization’s teats and past wealth? To be fair, there are some who can contribute. Then, wouldn’t this also apply to some of the other races who can contribute as well?

    See, that seems to be the flaw of many a white folk, they generalize others but fail to see it applying to themselves. So, back to my original post – if the white folks want others to go on, on the basis of their colour and origin, then I say, they should lead by example. After all, you like leading and telling others what to do, don’t you?

  278. Amarok says:
    @Mr Anatta

    Indeed, the great trickster in the Europeans and modern Americans have run amok. It’s high time the Great Spirit return and revert to natural harmony.

  279. Amarok says:
    @littlereddot

    Good points. For point 5, I’d rather it be called the Great Turtle (including Canada). The continent America was after all, named after Amerigo Vespucci, a dubious explorer. Fitting in a way, the lies and deceit that they have practised should go together with the name of a con man.

    In reality, it would be too much to hope for. A good step forward would be to recognise their hypocrisy and that their deeds don’t match their words.

    • Replies: @Mr Anatta
    , @littlereddot
  280. Bert33 says:

    Wow. That’s a lot of paragraphs. Unfortunately, quality and quantity are noninterchangeable and this piece begs a rewrite, preferably by someone with a more positive attitude and a clearer understanding of our current problems.

  281. Amarok says:
    @Mevashir

    I could not agree with you more. Forcing people into the badlands and the outer fringes, forcefully taking our children into institutions and ignoring the numerous crimes (ongoing today) against the First Nations.

  282. Mr Anatta says:
    @Luus Kanin

    You make a fair and valid point but please try not to label others as simpletons and therefore intellectually inferior to you because i can assure you that intellectual superiority has ‘absolutely nothing’ to do with the reason that we are here in this realm and you should take note how lttlereddot didn’t stoop to finger pointing back at you.

    We have to be very careful how we treat others because life is a mirror.

    If littleredot has a response back to you i look forward to it.

    • Replies: @Luus Kanin
  283. @Luus Kanin

    How do you reconcile the fact that land that was supposedly stolen from the red man had been stolen by the red man previously

    The definition of theft is to take what is not yours.

    Whether or not the item was previously stolen is a separate matter.

    Your logic is like if two kids are snatching a lollypop from each other, thereby stealing it from each other, it is then ok for you to take it for yourself.

    obfuscating

    It appears that this is a “big” word for you. LOL.

    Ah, the wonders of an American education.

    • Replies: @Luus Kanin
  284. @anonymous

    I had to google who that is.

    Thank you. You have pointed out an honorable man that deserves the support of the world.

  285. Mr Anatta says:
    @Amarok

    It will be a karmic ‘amerigo round’ and around and around again and again until all Americans learn from God sacraments like the Peyote cactus, which was used by some of the native North American Indian tribes that made them as a whole far more spiritually advanced than the spiritually ignorant invading European white men with their guns.

    • Thanks: Amarok
  286. @Amarok

    In reality, it would be too much to hope for. A good step forward would be to recognise their hypocrisy and that their deeds don’t match their words.

    Wise words indeed.

    It is painful to see the strong bully the good. Your people truly deserve your lands back.

    • Thanks: Amarok
  287. Another outstanding piece by Thomas Dalton. We need more writers like him. Kudos to Ron Unz for reposting this!

  288. Anonymike says:
    @Miro23

    Don’t forget the ever-present hazard inherent in democracy – that democracy will turn into two foxes and chicken voting on what’s for dinner.

    • Agree: HdC
  289. @littlereddot

    Obfuscate. My grandmother taught me the word before I started kindergarten. She said it was like when I played hide and seek. One person will hide while one person will seek the person hiding. The person hiding is obfuscating, but be careful not to use the word obfuscate, or no one will seek them.

    • Replies: @littlereddot
  290. @Mr Anatta

    Mr. Anatta you are of course correct that I should not label littlereddot a simpleton and then suggest I am somehow intellectually superior. I think I should have phrased my response better so that one would not make that conclusion. I did not mean to suggest he was a simpleton, only that he knew what he was doing when purposefully writing as if he were a simpleton. I have great regard for the people that post here including littlereddot. I do of course enjoy a verbal joust now and then and hope my ribbing is taken as intended, which is not malicious, just good natured teasing.

  291. @Luus Kanin

    If you can remember what you were taught in kindergarten, that means you are barely in your adulthood…if at all.

    But I can tell that you speak the truth because your grandmother could not teach the full meaning of the word so used an approximation such as “hide”.

    Anyway obfuscate does not merely mean hide. It has far more nuance than that. Go check out its accurate meaning.

    Thank you, it has been charming chatting with you. But I am looking for more adult conversation.

    Goodbye.

    • Replies: @Luus Kanin
  292. Mishko says:

    I used control-f to check, but no mention of the book
    “Germany must perish!” published by one Theodore Kaufman in 1941.
    In which he advocated genocide of the german population.
    Does serve as good enough wordplay/allusion though, IMO.

    Abolish and even destroy the set in stone institutions that do not improve
    living conditions and proclaim the constitution as holy writ?
    Abolish this insanity of abortions for everybody everywhere anytime.

    No need to reinvent the wheel.
    To be fair, I live in The Netherlands so I should probably STFU. =)

    • Replies: @Mulga Mumblebrain
  293. Where is the discussion about secession? Somehow that key aspect of this piece got lost. We need active political groups around the US, all pushing for independence, and all supporting each other. That, along with promoting pro-White policies, would cause real trouble for the powers that be.

  294. @Mishko

    That is where the Nazi Judeocide becomes tragically ironic as well as utterly abominable. The oldest extant descriptions of genocide and how to achieve it, and exhortations to commit it as a Divine mission and injuntion, are in the texts of Judaism.

  295. @Johan

    No. The ends towards which the US and China are proceeding are utterly antithetical. The US elites aim to introduce unchangeable neo-feudalism, with a tiny elite controlling almost all wealth and the proles divided against one another in an eternal ‘war of all against all’.
    The Chinese aim for an egalitarian and ‘ecological’ civilization, with harmony amongst its people, and in relations with other States. Chalk and cheese.

  296. @littlereddot

    I gave some to a friend, an habitual pethidine user, who swapped it with me for some cannabis. I’m wary of self-medication. I did do a course on tissue culture at a University once, and was most intrigued to see that the plant being used was Lophophora williamsii

  297. Fr. John says:
    @Dr. Robert Morgan

    Footnote #16 ” Now, if we could only get Anglin to drop his allegiance to the Judeo-Christian God and to that long-dead Jewish rabbi, he would be much better off.”

    “Dr.” Robert Morgan “It’s easy to prove human races are unequal. Christians don’t care about that though. The Christian is concerned only with his “soul” and its fate, so to him race is necessarily unimportant.”

    And this is the reason why Alienists can pretend they are intelligent; because these lies are just that- LIES. Nor why Nietzsche won’t save you…. but only Christ God.

    Gents- You are standing on the shoulders, hands, feet, and blood of those WHITE MEN who, as Christians, died to enable you to ‘slap God in the face’ because your HUBRIS won’t admit there is a Creator, who made YOU! And to whom you owe fealty.

    1) There is no such thing as a “judo-Christian God.” YHWH GOD is the God and Father of Our Lord Jesus Christ. Most ‘jews’ would not want to own a God such as that. The phrase in question was a ‘publicity ploy’ in the 20th Century by master Jewish Hucksters such as Bernays, used (basically) to lull Americans who were listening to closely to Charles Lindbergh, to see what he saw in National Socialist Germany, and wanted to try to incarnate an American Version of it!

    2) If Christ is God, (and He is) then His INCARNATION is the most stellar miracle, and most important element of this entire world’s History. God is INTIMATELY concerned with the BODY- and therefore, RACE is OF UTMOST IMPORTANCE. And its’ purity… because Jewry is NOT.

    Encyclopedia Judaica Jerusalem (1971) – “It is a common assumption,’ and one that seems ineradicable even in the face of evidence to the contrary, that the Jews of today constitute a race, a homogenous entity easily recognizable. From the preceding discussion of the origin and early history of the Jews, it should be clear that in the course of their formation as a people and a nation they had ALREADY assimilated a variety of racial strains from people moving into the general area they occupied. This had taken place by interbreeding and then by conversion to Judaism of a considerable number of communities… Thus the diversity of the racial and genetic attributes of various Jewish colonies of today renders any unified racial classification of them a contradiction in terms. Despite this [mixed race of converts and intermarriages], many people readily accept the notion that they are a distinct race….”.

    Yet, the Bible (and Christian theology) demands purity- of mind, heart, and BODY. One of the commands is against ADULTERATION, if memory serves….

    The prohibition in American law against non-Whites is derived from this construct of Incarnation Purity. It lasted until 1965. Everything that has come since, is the result of the watering down of Biblical Christianity, and the Judaization of American life.

    So, for starters (one has to have milk before Meat!) try reading these posts, over at Faith and Heritage.

    http://faithandheritage.com/2017/02/the-reformation-and-race-part-i-john-hus-czech-nationalist/

    And don’t lie, anymore. It merely points out how stupid you are… or at least, how woefully ignorant.

    “Though the gospel has been announced to all nations, to pretend that it has been, or can be, embraced by all ethnicities equally is supported neither in Scripture, history, nor common experience. The mandated genocides of the Cainites and Canaanites, the divorce and collective reprobation of Israel, and apostolic missionary emphasis on the Levant and Europe, all militate against it. Alienists may delude themselves to the contrary, but the Westminster fathers, in their very Calvinist doctrines of nations and providence, and whose lives were defined by opposition to Rome and Spain, did not believe every ethnicity had an equal relationship to the Kingdom of God. They, like the continental Reformers and all Christians of their day, used the ethnic terms “Turk” and “Jew” as synonyms for reprobate.” – http://faithandheritage.com/2018/01/the-westminster-confession-is-kinism-part-2/

  298. HdC says:

    “…master Jewish Hucksters such as Bernays, used (basically) to lull Americans who were listening to closely to Charles Lindbergh, to see what he saw in National Socialist Germany, and wanted to try to incarnate an American Version of it!…”
    Would you mind explaining this statement using simpler language and shorter sentences?
    I have difficulty understanding what it is you’re trying to say, here. Thanks HdC

    • Replies: @Fr. John
  299. @littlereddot

    Finally, it took a lot of doing, but I finally got you to acknowledge there was such a thing as nuance, as I have argued in every post that I sent to you. The light bulb finally went off with you. Glad you could finally see it, even if you couldn’t acknowledge it prior to using the word to attack me with. I gladly suffer slings and arrows so that you may be enlightened, even if you’ve only made it to 15 watts.
    Arrivederci.

    • Replies: @littlereddot
  300. Johan says:

    The best argument against democracy is a five-minutes conversation with an average voter. (Winston Churchill)

    The best argument against democracy and equality is a five-seconds glance through the comment section of my articles. (Thomas Dalton).

  301. @Luus Kanin

    Your version of nuance was: “oh he was fighting with his brother over the land. So I was entitled to take it”.

    That was not nuance, that is obfuscation.

    Why do I have to teach you your own language?

  302. Fr. John says:
    @HdC

    Sorry. Bernays (related to Freud) was a master of ADVERTISING, and his own words clearly showed that he was seeking to ‘pull the wool over the eyes of Christian America’ in more than just purchasing the next best ‘sliced bread’ thing.

    Lindbergh ( and the German Bund Societies) were making massive inroads in the 1930’s in the USA, both with people of German extraction, and the non-interventionists in the war, to KEEP AMERICA out. FDR, otoh, WANTED to be in the war.

    Jewish fifth columnists (who by then had begun to own papers, media, etc) SILENCED LINDBERGH, especially after his 9/11/41 speech in Des Moines, where he NAMED THE JEW OPENLY, to shut down ANY honest discourse, MUCH LIKE THE MEDIA (Zuckerberg, Bezos, Soros, Pelosi, et al.) have marginalized ANYONE who dares talk against The Dems, Biden, the COVIDIOT regime, abolition of more and more of our American Liberties, etc.

    Hope that clarifies the thought I tried to present.

    • Replies: @HdC
  303. HdC says:
    @Fr. John

    Thank you kindly for taking the time for your explanation, which confirms my understanding of the situation under discussion here.
    I am still amazed how 80% of the US politicians and population, who were dead set against entering WWII, were “convinced” to finally enter that bloodbath, on the side of the communist Soviet Union, no less! “Repeat a big lie often enough…”
    Recently I read a new biography of Stalin, written by a Russian author. I found it blood curdling, the off-hand instructions by Stalin to murder millions of his citizens. And the USA aided and abetted this monster and his regime.
    If the current occurrences in the USA: riots, mass shop lifting, mass robbery, destruction of property, public murder etc. all without any apparent repercussions for the perpetrators, does not convince the public at large that the USA fought on the wrong side during both WW, and that some kind of corrective action is required, I fear the worst for the US and western society.

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply -


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
$
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Thomas Dalton Comments via RSS
PastClassics
Becker update V1.3.2
The Shaping Event of Our Modern World
The Surprising Elements of Talmudic Judaism