RSS
It was a surprising admission when The New York Times reported in October that U.S. intelligence agencies finally acknowledged the assassination of Darya Dugina was authorized by the Ukrainian government.
The unexpected confession came more than a month after a car bomb killed the 29-year old journalist and daughter of Russian political theorist Aleksandr Dugin who personally witnessed her violent death in Moscow, resulting in a subsequent heart attack.
In the aftermath, the United Nations called for an investigation into Dugina’s murder which came at the hands of an improvised explosive device (IED) planted underneath the driver’s side of her father’s car.
By the time Western media fessed up to Kyiv’s guilt, the Federal Security Service (FSB) of Russia had already conducted their own inquiry which found the fingerprints of the Security Service of Ukraine (SBU) all over the August homicide of whom many speculate Mr. Dugin to have been the intended target.
It should be noted, however, that the website of the Ukrainian government enemies list Myrotvorets (“Peacemaker”) which included the Dugin family is based in Langley, Virginia, the home of CIA headquarters. If the truth be known, it’s more likely the intelligence community not only knew Ukraine was behind it all along but gave the green light to Kyiv themselves. Most Americans who were previously unaware of the Russian intellectual must be wondering—why Dugin?
The elder Russian thinker has long been portrayed as “Putin’s brain” and a Rasputin-esque figure by the Western intelligentsia but the exaggerated depiction of his Svengali influence over the Kremlin has only become more widespread since the special military operation in Ukraine began last year.
All this even though Mr. Dugin holds no authority over the war nor has any involvement in the Russian government beyond his previous service as an advisor to the Chairman of the State Duma. Still, this characterization of the prolific writer as the mastermind behind Putin’s foreign policy is ubiquitous in corporate media despite the absence of any evidence the Russian president has ever met the man, much less allowed his ideas to shape executive decisions.
It is this same narrative which let the yellow press to get away with disparaging his slain daughter, a noncombatant and innocent victim killed in violation of international law, by defaming her as a disinformation agent instead of the writer and activist she was. There were even attempts to deny the attack constituted an act of terrorism with the implication she was a legitimate military target guilty by association with her father. The Washington Post, the CIA’s preferred rag, was especially boastful.
Equally tasteless but perhaps more surprising were the instances when commentators on the so-called left used the car bombing as an opportunity to vilify Dugin and regurgitate the propaganda deployed to justify his progeny’s political execution.
Journalist Benjamin Norton, formerly of The Grayzone, took the occasion to share that he is among those who consider Dugin to be a “fascist” — even as Darya Dugina’s journalistic work exposing actual Nazis in Ukrainian militias such as Azov, Aidar, and the Kraken was what landed her on the kill list to begin with. Not to mention that the suspected perpetrator is alleged by the FSB to be a member of Ukraine’s infamous neo-Nazi regiment headquartered in Mariupol.
Many were also quick to point out the incredible irony that Norton’s blog is entitled Multipolarista, in what is clearly a nod to the international relations theory associated with Dugin, though he has apparently renamed the page since.
Within the motherland itself Dugin is considered to be a marginal figure, but even if the Russian geo-strategist is as influential a figure as claimed, is he as reactionary as Norton makes him out to be? At the heart of this question lies a fundamental misunderstanding of both Russia and Dugin’s philosophy that is indicative of the shallow state of Western left-wing politics as a whole.
Although he was at one point an early member of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation (CPRF) and helped compose its constitution, Dugin is certainly no longer a communist and far from it. But before one delves into his work, it is important to understand that his controversial views developed at a major turning point in Russian history where an ideological vacuum opened amid the collapse of the Soviet Union with the introduction of extreme free market capitalism in the early 1990s.
Even though he had been an anti-Soviet dissident during perestroika and played a hand in the fall of the USSR, Dugin became equally dismayed by the austerity measures ushered in via the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and World Bank under the vodka-drenched administration of Boris Yeltsin. The first president of the Russian Federation’s “shock therapy” economic policies quickly led to record unemployment, hyperinflation and a GDP decline which surpassed that of the Great Depression in America. Russia’s conversion to the Western model of liberal democracy did not bring political reform as promised and instead plunged millions below the poverty line while creating a new class of mega-billionaires in control of more than half of the nation’s resources overnight.
By April 1993, discontent had become so widespread a national referendum was held on Yeltsin’s reform program. Once the election results were disputed and the Supreme Soviet blocked his initiatives, a power struggle ensued in the months that followed. By the final week of September, a decree to remove Yeltsin was issued and the pro-Western comprador retaliated by dissolving the elected legislature with orders to vacate the White House parliamentary building.
When members of the Congress of People’s Deputies refused to leave the Duma, mass protests and street fighting broke out between Yeltsin’s quislings and defenders of the legislative assembly. The resulting massacre left hundreds of Muscovites dead and countless more injured, as rumors swirled of mysterious mercenary snipers on the roof of the American embassy stoking the violence.
Two years earlier, there had been a failed communist coup attempt where Yeltsin and his supporters took shelter in the White House—but this time many of those same deputies had switched to the opposition, leaving Yeltsin to illegally seize power himself. In early October, the standoff and constitutional crisis ended when the U.S.-backed dictator ordered tanks to shell the parliament and troops to storm the burning edifice in the largest incident of political bloodshed since the Russian Revolution.
The post-Soviet elections were marred with voter fraud which disenfranchised the Russian people’s support for the anti-austerity coalition. However, left-wing parties were not the only significant political force which opposed Yeltsin’s mass privatization, as the resistance included a wide-ranging alliance of conservative pan-Slavic and Russian nationalist organizations alongside the Communist Party.
At the time, Yeltsin referred to the left-right coalition of the National Salvation Front as a “red-brown alliance.” Although the notion of a ‘cross-front’ historically predates Black October (about which this author has previously written), when American pseudo-left writers such as Alexander Reid Ross use the phrase to smear anti-imperialists in reference to Russia today, they are using the same pro-capitalist jargon as Yeltsin when he slandered the popular front elected to stop the austerity forced upon the country.
In an interview with Mint Press News where Dugin is mentioned over a dozen times, Reid Ross provided his own confused definition of the term:
“A red-brown alliance is a political formation that includes leftist and fascist forces. I see a number of red-brown alliances forming today, particularly in the field of political geography. A number of far-right groups view the modern-day axis of Syria, Iran and Russia as a kind of international counterweight to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which has always been seen by fascist groups as a kind of nemesis led by the nations that defeated the Rome-Berlin axis in 1945.”
To anyone with any real understanding of World War II history, this is totally false. The nation that did the most to defeat the Axis powers was the Soviet Union, with more than three quarters of all German military casualties occurring on the Eastern front— the same country NATO was created to destroy.
Perhaps this is what Marshal Georgy Zhukov meant when he said, “we liberated Europe from fascism, but they will never forgive us for it.” It is equally delusional for Reid Ross to equate three countries in the crosshairs of U.S. imperialism with the Axis Powers considering that NATO itself has incubated fascism since it was founded in 1949, from its partnership with right-wing terrorists in Operation Gladio throughout the Cold War to Ukraine today where bona fide neo-Nazis are being armed to fight Moscow. The truth is that ever since the strategies of rollback versus containment were first debated by American policymakers, Washington has been ceding control to far-right elements in countries allied with the West.
In Against the Fascist Creep, Reid Ross attributes the resurgence of antisemitism in post-Soviet Russia to the Communist Party’s decision to align with conservatives against Yeltsin’s market reforms. While there was an unfortunate increase in bigotry following the USSR’s breakup during which many Jews left to Israel, Reid Ross completely fails to comprehend that any scapegoating stemmed from the restoration of capitalism itself.
Economic historians have produced academic studies demonstrating the social impact of austerity measures in Weimar Germany in the 1930s and the cutbacks by Yeltsin’s finance minister Yegor Gaidar and privatization tsar Anatoly Chubais were not unlike those under the German Reich. It certainly did not help matters that many of the country’s new oligarchs happened to be Jewish.
However, it should be reminded that there had been persecution of Jews throughout Russia’s entire history, especially under the Tsarist autocracy. All through the Cold War, the U.S. made exaggerated allegations of antisemitism against the USSR and placed sanctions on Moscow over its solidarity with Palestine. Nevertheless, the pro-Soviet uprising in 1993 did not receive popular support due to any revival in Judeophobia but because of widespread public disapproval of Yeltsin’s neoliberal rule. At the same time, the failure of both the moribund socialist system and the catastrophic transition to a market economy under a former Communist Party bureaucrat made the reappearance of conservative ideas appealing to the Russian people.
Although it failed to prevent the 1993 October coup, ultra-leftists who criticize the decision by Gennady Zyuganov and the Communist Party to provisionally align with conservatives against Yeltsin’s counter-revolution should revisit Lenin’s “Left-Wing” Communism: An Infantile Disorder.” When the proto-fascist Black Hundreds movement first appeared amidst the failed 1905 Russian Revolution, Lenin instructed the Bolsheviks to infiltrate their rallies and steer the workers being seduced by reactionary ultranationalism toward socialism:
“Under tsardom we had no “legal possibilities” whatsoever until 1905; but when Zubatov, a secret police agent, organized Black Hundred workers’ assemblies and workingmen’s societies for the purpose of trapping revolutionaries and combating them, we sent members of our Party to these assemblies and into these societies (I personally remember one of them, Comrade Babushkin, a prominent St. Petersburg worker, who was shot by the tsar’s generals in 1906). They established contact with the masses, managed to carry on their agitation, and succeeded in wresting workers from the influence of Zubatov’s agents.”
In the chapter “No Compromises?”, the Russian revolutionary also stresses the need to consider political compromises with other political forces and even bourgeois parties based on the circumstances of each situation and whether it is useful in waging class war in the long run:
“The more powerful enemy can be vanquished only by exerting the utmost effort, and by the most thorough, careful, attentive, skilful and obligatory use of any, even the smallest, rift between the enemies, any conflict of interests among the bourgeoisie of the various countries and among the various groups or types of bourgeoisie within the various countries, and also by taking advantage of any, even the smallest, opportunity of winning a mass ally, even though this ally is temporary, vacillating, unstable, unreliable and conditional. Those who do not understand this reveal a failure to understand even the smallest grain of Marxism, of modern scientific socialism in general.”
Another expression that is frequently mentioned in association with ‘red-brown’-ism is the abbreviation ‘Nazbol’ which is a direct reference to one of the most significant but idiosyncratic factions involved in the Black October clashes between Yeltsin’s thugs and parliamentary forces.
The National Bolshevik Party (NBP) was a splinter group which proclaimed to fuse Russian nationalism with left-wing economics and Alexander Dugin was one its earliest members. Its other co-founder was Eduard Limonov, an eccentric and bisexual punk rock novelist who had spent a great deal of time in the U.S. and Europe during his previous years as an anti-Soviet dissident.
While residing in New York, Limonov was a regular at the punk music venue CBGB’s and rubbed shoulders with radical leftists and Trotskyists in the Socialist Workers Party. The influence of hip Western counterculture from his literary exile in both the U.S. and France was reflected in his explicit writings which featured queer characters and continued in the Nazbol’s edgy aesthetic choices and emphasis on shock tactics in their propaganda when he returned to Russia.
In fact, the inspiration for the National Bolshevik Party’s syncretic logo featuring a hammer and sickle in place of the swastika on the insignia of Nazi Germany is rumored to have come from the 1986 film Sid and Nancy where Sid Vicious (played by Gary Oldman) wears a shirt featuring the design on screen.
In real life, the Sex Pistols bassist had donned the original swastika, but director Alex Cox chose to modify it for the movie. In the 1970s British punk rock scene, designers like the late Vivienne Westwood toyed with fascist imagery in the fashion and aesthetics of the subculture— not in any sincere political sense but for pure shock value and to deliberately offend mainstream sensibilities. As a Western import and provocateur, Limonov adopted this form of stylistic subversion to make the National Bolsheviks cause célèbre in post-communist Russia and it translated relatively successfully.
However, just as was the case with the punk movement, the intent behind the use of such contradictory symbols to be detached from their original meaning often went misunderstood. No more is this clear than in the Western misinterpretation of the NBP as a far right organization when in Russia itself, the National Bolsheviks were mostly considered a left-wing party during their brief existence, albeit one with elements of nationalism but not necessarily associated with conservatism.
All in all, National Bolshevism was an incoherent ideological grouping whose leadership included post-modernists like Limonov, the anarchist poet Yegor Letov, as well as some conservatives such as Dugin, the latter of whom broke from the NBP in the late 90s as he published his most well-known work The Foundations of Geopolitics which laid out his own distinct worldview.
It is crucial to understand that as a strategist, Dugin views the geopolitical landscape in terms of spatial poles and geographical civilizations. He posits that continents which are landlocked tend to be collectivist-based societies whereas landmasses that have access to the seaways contain cultures that are predisposed towards individualism.
Historically, it is true that the European powers were maritime empires built on naval expansion and sea merchant power while the Russian empire was a land power. In this paradigm, Dugin believes Russia occupies a unique space as a self-contained civilization and sovereign pole but one that he places culturally closer to Asia than Western Europe.
Dugin’s movement does not consider Russian culture to be on the Eastern periphery of European civilization but reimagines it at the “heartland” of Eurasia, a standalone continent that is as much a part of the Orient as it is under European influence. He argues this symbiotic relationship goes back to the fusion between Eastern Orthodox Christianity adopted under the Byzantine Empire with the Mongol conquest of Kievan Rus in the 13th century. It is from this synthesis which the modern Russian nation-state originated, thereby transforming Moscow into a ‘third Rome.’
Throughout history, there have been numerous attempts by hostile foreign powers to conquer the Eurasian heartland, or what the founder of geopolitics Sir Halford Mackinder also referred to as the ‘Pivot Area.’ However, Dugin looks at the expansion of NATO as more than just the latest encirclement but an attempt by Atlanticist civilization, namely the United States and Europe, to export liberal democracy and decadent Western values onto Russia by force.
Dugin sees the West as aiming to impose its own cultural standards of moral universalism through forceable conversion onto Russia, which has a thousand-year-old collectivistic way of life with ancient traditions and deeply ingrained societal differences. According to Dugin’s outlook, the systems of communism and capitalism were both equally Western systems that are inapplicable to Russia. Even though the Cold War ended, no matter which political ideology Moscow adopts, Anglo-American imperialism continues to view Eurasia as a resource-rich land to be balkanized, conquered, and contained.
It is worth noting that the same year Foundations of Geopolitics was published, Polish-American diplomat Zbigniew Brzezinski devised the plan to dominate Eurasia for American global supremacy in his influential book The Grand Chessboard:
“For America, the chief geopolitical prize is Eurasia. Eurasia is the globe’s largest continent and is geopolitically axial. A power that dominates Eurasia would control two of the world’s three most advanced and economically productive regions. …. About 75 per cent of the world’s people live in Eurasia, and most of the world’s physical wealth is there as well, both in its enterprises and underneath its soil. Eurasia accounts for 60 per cent of the world’s GNP and about three-fourths of the world’s known energy resources.”
According to Dugin, the 20th century was an ideological battleground between competing political systems during which fascism and communism both failed to defeat liberalism, or Western capitalism, which emerged as the international order in its final decade. In his provocative essay Fascism: Borderless and Red, the Russian theorist describes how fascism doomed itself allying with the national bourgeoisies of Italy and Germany to take power despite an ostensible ideological aversion to capitalism.
From Dugin’s perspective, fascism in Europe was short-lived because of the tentative alliance between the West and USSR in World War II and the self-sabotage of Hitler’s foreign policy. By the end of the second millennium, liberal democracy stood alone as the dominant world system after the Soviet dissolution with communism joining fascism in the dustbin of history.
Yet despite his portrayal as a far-right nationalist in the West, Dugin self-identifies as a traditionalist in the same vein as perennial philosophers from the interwar period such as René Guénon or Julius Evola and denounces fascism up and down as a product of modernity.
While it may have rejected Western institutions of democracy, it is true that fascism was essentially a modernist movement, albeit a reactionary form, in that it set out to remake mankind with an enthusiastic attitude toward technology and industrialization. In fact, Dugin considers the three main political theories of the last century to have all been equally rooted in modernity and thus insufficient in solving humanity’s challenges, hence his call for a ‘fourth political theory’, or an alternative to liberalism that is neither communist or fascist.
However, he does attempt to redeem the notion of national or civilizational traditions from what he believes to be the misguided racism of European fascism. Once one delves into his prolific body of work, the real reason why he is mischaracterized as a Nazi by Western liberals quickly becomes clear. Holding a mirror up to the orientalism of the English-speaking world, Dugin describes in The Fourth Political Theory how the West’s regard for its own values as the only universal truth is itself a form of racism:
“Hitler’s racism is only one form of racism. This is the most obvious straightforward and biological and most repulsive. there are other forms of racism — cultural (asserting there are high and low cultures), civilizational (dividing people into those civilized and those insufficiently uncivilized), technological (viewing technological development as the main criterion for the value of a society), social (stating, in the spirit of the Protestant doctrine of predestination, that the rich are the best and the greatest compared to the poor), economic (in which all humanity is ranked according to the degree of material well-being), and evolutionary (for which it is axiomatic that human society is the result of biological development, in which the basic processes of the evolution of species — survival of the fittest, natural selection, and so on — continue today. European and American societies are fundamentally afflicted with these types of racism, unable to eradicate them from itself despite intensive efforts. Being fully aware of how revolting this phenomenon is, people in the West tend to make racism a taboo. However, all this turns into a witch hunt — new pariahs accused of ‘fascism’ are its victims, often for no apparent reason. Thus, this very political correctness and its norms are transformed into a totalitarian discipline of political, purely racist exclusions.
Undoubtedly racist is the idea of unipolar globalization. It is based on the history and values of Western, and especially American, society are equivalent to universal laws, and artificially tries to construct a global society based on what are actually local and historically specific values — democracy, the market, parliamentarian, capitalism, individualism, human rights, and unlimited technological development. These values are local ones, emerging from the particular development of a single culture, and globalization is trying to impose them on all of humanity as something that is universal and taken for granted. This attempt implicitly argues that the values of all other peoples and cultures are imperfect, underdeveloped, and should be subject to modernization and standardization in imitation of the Western model. globalization is nothing more than a globally deployed model of Western European, or rather Anglo-Saxon ethnocentrism, which is the pure manifestation of racist ideology.”
He continues:
“American values tend to be universal ones. In reality, it is a new form of ideological aggression against the multiplicity of cultures and traditions still existing in the rest of the world. Therefore, all traditionalists should be against the West and globalization, as well as against the imperialist politics of the United States.”
To call the man a fascist is not only misleading but trivializes the meaning of the concept. Unfortunately, any attempt to rationalize Dugin is self-defeating seeing as the current neo-McCarthyist political atmosphere vilifies anyone who defends Russia or other nations targeted for regime change. By legitimizing NATO imperialism against Moscow under the slogan of fighting for what Dugin calls Eurocentric and individualistic formulations of “human rights,” the liberal left has taken up its own form of “White Man’s Burden.”
In his 1901 essay “To The Person Sitting in Darkness”, Mark Twain satirically retorted Rudyard Kipling’s jingoistic poem encouraging the American colonization of the Philippines by mocking the missionary movement as a moral front for imperialism. Upon reading Dugin’s critique of globalization, it is difficult not to see parallels between the ‘civilizing mission’ rationale of manifest destiny in Kipling’s ode to imperialism and the Russian philosopher’s description of Western liberal values in The Fourth Political Theory.
At no point does Dugin advocate Russian revanchism or ethnic supremacy in his work to counter American unipolarity, nor does he call for the restoration of the Tsarist Empire. Instead, he argues that a multipolar world is needed to protect the inherent heterogeneity of civilizations from being wiped out by globalism and Western universality:
“The future world should be characterized by multiplicity; diversity should be taken by its richness and its treasure, and not as a reason for inevitable conflict: many civilizations, many poles, many centers, many sets of values on one planet and in one humanity. Many worlds.”
Dugin’s meaning of diversity does not translate to multiculturalism in the Western liberal sense, though he does embrace the ethnopluralism of Russian society and the many nationalities within its borders formerly colonized under the Tsars. If there is any prominent right-wing nationalist who advocates expelling Muslim minorities in the Caucasus from southern Russia, look no further than the Western-backed opposition figure Alexei Navalny. For Dugin, real diversity is civilizational and can be represented only with a multipolar distribution of geopolitical power. So how can his thought be equated with Hitler?
Precisely because the Western liberal conception of fascism is ahistorical and contains no economic understanding. The liberal misreading of fascism is predicated on a fragmented historical timeline which truncates the expansionism of Nazi Germany, Japan, and Italy from its own chronology of European colonialism.
After all, prior to World War II, the Berlin-Rome Axis did not possess the same number of colonies with populations to subjugate and exploit as the British or the French. Before everything, the Third Reich and fascist Italy set out to take over the few remaining territories and corners of the globe which had escaped European domination. For example, Mussolini continued the Italian plundering of North Africa, while Hitler tried to secure the lebensraum by invading the Soviet Union.
However, both Germany and Italy had already previously established genocidal colonies in Africa as great powers prior to adopting extreme nationalism in the 1930s. If this reasoning entered liberal discourse, Western colonialism would be understood as having laid the groundwork for fascism in Europe and NATO itself would inherit the geo-strategic position of the Third Reich today with its containment of Russia.
Instead, the Western liberal “anti-fascist” outlook considers ultranationalist authoritarian regimes an antagonism to the extent they have a revolutionary nature and try to establish collectivist societies centered around the nation-state with new institutions and traditions— not because of empire-building. It is the same reason why the Soviet Union under Stalin is often unfairly lumped in with fascism in canonical texts such as Hannah Arendt’s The Origins of Totalitarianism. The Nobel Prize-winning German author Thomas Mann, an early opponent of the Nazis who fled to Switzerland after Hitler came to power, disagreed:
“To place Russian communism on the same moral level with Nazi fascism, because both are ‘totalitarian,’ is, at best, superficial, in the worse case, it is fascism. He who insists on this equality may be a democrat; in truth and in his heart, he is already a fascist, and will surely fight fascism with insincerity and appearance, but with complete hatred only of communism.”
Contrary to Arendt’s treatise, fascism is not simply extreme authoritarianism stemming from the decline of the nation-state system in Europe. Nor is it simply a Bonapartist mobilization of an armed wing of the petty bourgeoisie against a socialist uprising by the working class as defined by some sub-branches of Marxism. Although there may be small amounts of truth in those perspectives, they are ultimately inadequate. From a truly Marxist understanding, fascism in its essence as a historical phenomenon occurs during an economic crisis when one section of the ruling class seizes power and organizes forces of violence against workers and groups fighting for social progress in order to preserve capitalism. For example, the far-right monarchist Black Hundreds carried out antisemitic pogroms and terrorized socialists in the middle of mass labor strikes and peasant uprisings to defend the Romanov dynasty during the Russian Revolution. As Upton Sinclair once put it — ”fascism is capitalism plus murder.”
After Mussolini first became prime minister in the early 1920s, the German Marxist Clara Zetkin observed how the Italian fascists disguised themselves in populist demagogic rhetoric or “deceptive revolutionary phraseology.” Or as political scientist Michael Parenti explained in his lecture “Fascism: The False Revolution”, “fascism offers a reactionary solution, not a social solution, to the contradictions of capitalism.”
As much as he criticizes liberalism, one valid critique of Dugin is that he too fails to comprehend that fascism was a level of development within capitalism, namely an authoritarian and last resort effort by the ruling class to maintain it. R. Palme Dutt, leader of the Communist Party of Great Britain in its heyday, expanded upon Lenin’s definition of fascism as a stage of decaying monopoly capitalism in “Fascism and Social Revolution.” Dutt saw fascism as rooted in the free market’s inherent contradictions of overproduction and underconsumption:
“Two alternatives, and only two, confront existing society at the present stage of development of the productive forces and of social organisation. One is to throttle the development of the productive forces in order to save class-society, to destroy material wealth, to destroy millions of “superfluous” human beings in the slow rot of starvation and the quick furnace of war, to crush down the working-class movement with limitless violence, to arrest the development of science and culture and education and technique, to revert to more primitive forms of limited, isolated societies, and thus to save for a while the rule of the possessing classes at the expense of a return to barbarism and spreading decay. This is the path which finds its most complete and organized expression in Fascism. The other is to organise the productive forces for the whole society by abolishing the class ownership of the means of production, and building up the classless communist society which can alone utilise and organise the modern productive forces. This is the path of communism, of the revolutionary working class. The issue of these two paths is the issue of the present epoch.”
Not only is it a diversionary tactic to mislabel Dugin a fascist, those who do so cannot even keep the details of his political history straight. The significant departure of Eurasianism from the eccentric anti-establishment pranks of the National Bolsheviks is entirely lost on the Western left which often conflates the two strains despite having little to no understanding of either movement. So too is the inconvenient fact that the NBP continued to vehemently protest the Russian government long after Yeltsin appointed his successor, Vladimir Putin, whose administration eventually outlawed the organization in 2007.
Ironically, it could even be argued that the anarchistic provocations of Pussy Riot inherited the legacy of the Nazbols in terms of their shared direct-action methods of protest and association with punk music. For example, a Latvian branch of National Bolsheviks once occupied a Riga church barricading themselves inside with fake grenades to protest the Baltic country’s treatment of ethnic Russian minorities and pending NATO integration in 2000.
The main difference is that the Russian feminist collective would use guerrilla-like disruptions of cathedrals to suit a pro-Western agenda. It was only when Putin began to oppose NATO enlargement around the time the NBP dissolved when many of his former critics, including both Limonov and Dugin, began to publicly support his foreign policy moves and this has continued for the duration of the Ukraine crisis. Similarly, it is said that Putin’s Eurasian Economic Union integration project must line up with Dugin’s theories when it is really a relationship of correlation, not causation. Nevertheless, the man gives a philosophical voice to the Russian side of the New Cold War which is really why he and his family have become a target.
How is it that Dugin’s name has become synonymous with an ideology he has condemned in the minds of the Western public? If one visits the Wikipedia page for the Russian political analyst, the very first sentence even states that Dugin is “known for views widely characterized as fascist.” Simultaneously, Amazon has banned the sale of all books by Dugin himself while only carrying a number of pro-Western critiques of his work. Quite simply, Americans are permitted to read and hear about the man but never read his words themselves, just as they are never presented with Moscow’s perspective on the Ukraine war. Amazon’s $600 million dollar contract with the C.I.A. doesn’t exactly make the censorship of his writing that surprising, nor does his diabolical presentation in the pages of the Bezos Post. The links between the news media and the intelligence community may be well-established going back to the Church Committee and its revelations about Operation Mockingbird but lesser-known and taken for granted are the connections between Langley and the conflict-of-interest editing of the popular online encyclopedia page. This is a perfect example of how propaganda spreads in the digital age and information warfare
In defiance of all the evidence pointing to the contrary, the undeterred synthetic left has chosen to parrot the big lie disseminated by major media outlets that Dugin is an extremist bogeyman. In Benjamin Norton’s case, down to the last details by echoing the groundless charge circulated in imperial news organs that the Russian scholar is a Sinophobe who envisions Moscow one day overtaking and dividing China based on decades-old statements ripped out of historical context. When the national security state isn’t manipulating the media to influence public opinion, it can rely on the pseudo-left to do its work for them and unfortunately, the consequences of this go way beyond matters related to Dugin. Ultimately, by mindlessly repeating such war propaganda, it undermines any remaining hope of developing an anti-war movement in the 21st century as the hand of the doomsday clock is pushed to ninety seconds—closer to midnight than at any point during the Cold War.
From a Marxist point of view, no doubt there is much to disagree with regarding Dugin’s worldview. Yet no matter what one thinks of his religious conservatism, there is a great deal of insight in his analysis of how the unipolar domination of the Anglosphere has taken shape since the fall of the USSR.
As a matter of fact, his positions have a great deal of overlap with an international left that at one time championed the anti-globalization movement. Perhaps this is why Dugin’s message resonates most strongly within the Global South whose political left does not abandon global justice or use social issues as a yardstick in place of opposition to empire.
For instance, his praise of Islam and its shared characteristics with Eastern Orthodoxy and Russian cultural traditions has made him a revered figure within Iran. It is little surprise given that it is Third World countries which would benefit the most from Atlanticist power retreating from its place of global domination. Then again, it could be argued that a multipolar world existed in the lead up to World War I and did not prevent its outbreak. With a third global conflict brewing today, maybe what it is really needed is a doctrine of equality among nations, not polarity or power centers.
During the Cold War, it was the Soviet Union which advocated the former colonies of the world had the right to national self-determination. While it may look as though socialism has been overcome once and for all as an alternative to Western capitalism, Dugin himself praises the mixed economic success of modern China which did not go the same route as the former USSR.
Like Frances Fukuyama before him who conceptualized the so-called “End of History”, perhaps the Russian ideologue should consider that the loss of socialism is not as permanent as it appears and until capitalism’s inherent contradictions are resolved, its resurgence is not as improbable as he suggests. Until then, we as Marxists should not dismiss those who have picked up the mantle of anti-imperialism since the demise of the former Soviet Union, no matter which political form it takes shape. By denouncing Dugin as a “fascist” and treating his work as unworthy of serious consideration, one is only showing that he is right to say that Marxism has become irrelevant in today’s world and Western capitalism is here to stay. The challenge has been issued, it remains to be seen whether we are up to it.
Max Parry is an independent journalist and geopolitical analyst based in New York. His writing has appeared widely in alternative media. Max may be reached at [email protected]
English
Arabic
Chinese (Simplified)
Dutch
French
German
Hebrew
Hindi
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Russian
Spanish
Swedish
Turkish
Vietnamese
This article is a bunch of Marxoid nonsense that has been debunked countless times. The author seems to be propagating the debunked myth of muh “fascism is capitalism in decay”.
If Fascism was indeed Capitalism in decay, why did both the Capitalist world AND the Soviet Union (which represented Communism and, in turn, the other face of the same shekel of materialism) declare an existencial war against it?
It’s time for Marxoids to stop coping about Fascism and start acknowledgind the historical and factual reality: Fascism was, and still is, the only try opposition to Capitalism and Materialism.
Video Link
What matters is the nature of the alliance. As equal partners or as master & servant.
China, Russia, India, Iran, and etc., were they act as ‘allies’, would act on the basis of sovereignty and mutual interest based on national interest.
In contrast, the current Jewish-White Alliance in the West is based on master and servant dynamic. Jews decree, whites agree, and the ONLY game in town in “Is it great for Jewish Supremacist power?” Whites are mere quislings to Jews.
China and Russia are many times bigger and more powerful than Iran or Syria but accords them respect as independent and sovereign nations with their own histories and values.
In contrast, everything and everyone must bow down to Jewish Supremacism and Jewish interests in the West, and the West tries to spread this hierarchy onto the non-West.
Jews and whites are like pimps and whores, or cowboys and horses. Hardly a meaningful alliance.
But whites have become accustomed to the Jewish cowboy on their backs. They believe their role is to serve Jews(and blacks and homos as the main allies of Jews). Pathetic.
I’ve never read Dugin – nor probably ever will –, so cut me some slack if I misrepresent something.
So… Dugin’s ideology is: “Hey! I’m not a racist, in fact, I’m the very opposite of it – to boot: my opponents are the real racists!”
Sounds like a Fox News talking head!
Being obsessed with Hitler, WWII, ‘racism’ is not an alternative – it is, ironically, the Establishment.
Meanwhile, to paraphrase Sam Francis:
In the Ethno-State, in the distant future, people will find quaint our era’s repression of Human Nature and our atonement for so-called ‘sins’ and ‘heresies’ (racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia etc.), in the same vein, 21st-Century people find quaint how the 19th-Century Victorians repressed Human Nature and found SEX to be ‘sinful’!
If Dugin were a “Traditionalist”, he wouldn’t even speak of racism, since the idea has never been found in the Traditional world. In that world, every religion/culture was its own solar system, and everything else was outside of it. Racism, so-called, is simply xenophilia mischaracterized by the usual suspects as something bad.
I can’t quite understand why the man is targeted for book banning and the assassination of his daughter. He is peddling something akin to Liberalism himself. Why did the CIA detonate a carbomb for his kid?
Easy enough answer. English speaking people’s under Jewish direction needed to whip the Germans into gimp status. Then once that was done, Russia gets gang raped by Lloyd Austin and Tony Blinken just to twist the knife and amplify the humiliation.
Italy and Germany were just the appetiser.
The anti Russia narrative had a vacancy for Rasputin character and Western media/deepstate casted him into the role, without his knowledge.
I am glad to see a Max Parry article on unz. 1, it is good to read something written by an intelligent person. 2, it is a breathe of fresh air to the stale boomer racism on unz.
Max Parry ought to visit some brown and black countries(this includes the US and Canada hahaha) and then Europe and then East Asia and then asks himself the question: which peoples on earth are capable of socialism.
I am wholly in the camp that East Asians(including Indochina) and Slavs can do communism, due to their advance culture, and all other countries are incapable of it, except for some pockets such as East Germany/Prussia.
Things are very dire in many Islamic countries where incest had destroyed the genes(this is science, not racism) and Latin America (where criminals have a great fecundity) and North America(where the are not sufficient men of valour to implement the necessary eliticide, and the fecundity distribution is growing more Latin American ie criminals having the most children)
given that, I think a Bonapartist figure can arise in Brazil, and lead it forward to socialism.
The USA, I hate to say it, hasn’t any hope, unless covid-2023 will actually be a boomer remover.
Why hasn’t a political party in the United States formed to tackle the outrageous housing costs? They would win landslide elections. The answer is- Americans cannot into politics, for them there are no collective problems and no ability to organise.
Guys who eat fast food, have the thinking capacity of one tweet, and consider themselves exceptional have probably lost their way here; they should go out and treat themselves to a can of coke.
We Gentiles seem to be very naive to the drama being played on us. Just look who controls the narrative , who is behind Critical Theory, and on and on….. This spectacle continues and we are not learning . Lets not just keep writing about it but do resist. Majority of people want bread ,butter and roof over the head, the rest is meaningless to them.We know from the history how people are controlled , how poor ones followed ideology of communism or fascism for bread and illusion of freedom. The only way is to know The Truth and live by it, as is written :Then you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free.”
This will determent where one will spend eternity. The Logos has prepared future for you and I, and we are making the choice.
Artificial Ideology of the Global Technocratic Neo-Feudalism.
Video Link
Video Link
Is Benjamin actually a Norton, or is he actually more of a Ben-Jamin? Was there a strategic name-change along the line by an ancestor who came from that “Name-Stealer” background?
Since when was Fascism anti-materialist. From what I recall Mussolini himself stated that fascism was the unification of state power with corporate might. By nature, corporations are an evil entity established by people with too much money and saturated with greed. Both fascism and communism are methods of control over people by means of centralized governance on behalf of some goddamned ideology= idiotology.
I’m the only true fascist.
(Neo)Fascism is truth.
Eternity is forever. It’s happening right now and has throughout the past and any possible future. It has nothing to do with the damnable concept of sin, heaven and hell. We are spirits temporarily living in an increasingly hellish 3D lifetime. Evil does exist, but so does its opposite. Greed and vanity are two of the most deadly sins. Honesty, honor, respect and love are the other side of the coin.
Perhaps the reason we currently exist on this prison planet is to experience and learn from our mistakes and to nourish our spirits and satisfy our souls. A great realizer once stated that love of money is the core of all evils. In the final analysis materialism as a philosophy is naught but a dead-end.
Like they say…you can’t take it with you.
While there was an unfortunate increase in bigotry…It certainly did not help matters that many of the country’s new oligarchs happened to be Jewish.
stopped reading right there. you lost all credibility.
1. 90% of the yeltsin oligarchs were jews.
2. what you call “bigotry” was 100% justified self-defense. “civic nationalism” is a perversion.
3. ross’s obsession with anti-semitism suggests something.
The “red-brown alliance” narrative originated during the cold war, with the western attempt to split the liberal-left from the USSR by portraying socialism and communism as “fascist.” This was a very successful psyop that has all but eradicated any form of effective socialist/communist politics from the western world and replaced it with globohomo culture war imperialism. It is such a successful psyop that the intelligence agencies have been able to reuse it even after the cold war, most recently to turn the western liberal-left against China.
Dugin does talk about that, iirc. From what I have seen of his work, when Dugin says “racism” he means specifically the Anglo/American conception of racial categories. When he uses the term “racism,” he does not equate it to tribalism or ethnos or loyalty to biological kin groups.
“While there was an unfortunate increase in bigotry following the USSR’s breakup during which many Jews left to Israel”. This is NOT true. It is nothing more than Zionist propaganda designed to encourage Jews to migrate to Israel. The late Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat once said: “While America is showering Israel with the latest weapons, Russia is now gifting Israel its extremist and bigoted Russians”. Many of these Russia migrants are not Jews, but a powerful and extremist constituency that is backing President Putin in all elections.
He is trying to implement an original theory of his own, rather confusing because he is trying to find the famous synthesis.
Like it or not we have to select a path in a crossroad: either you believe in some eternal laws given by God or Nature, or you believe in progressive rules linked to social darwinism and the ancient ideals of gnosis
Thanks Max ! So glad that our North American Indian culture is included in the video, at the end of your piece. The fact that anyone { especially a Russian thinker } can include the Indian culture with the other types of Government speaks for itself. But then the Russians didn’t genocide the Alaskan Indians and Eskimos like the Europeans did down South. When it comes to Governments – KISS. Otherwise we end up like what we have today.
That is exactly the problem.
Individual Americans cannot get into politics, and the political machines that can get into politics (and crush anybody else trying to get in to politics) are composed of professional politicians who regard politics as an income source. Only such politicians can survive in political machines, and the survivors either see only the demands of the political machine or they leave politics.
If, for example, the machine want’s money, then money it will get. If the money comes from China, well, the machine’s attitude is “so what?”. If street fighters and ballot fraud and immense amounts of money and gathering the “pre-cemetery” vote of those demented by old age (“ballot harvesting”) win an election, again, “the election was won, wasn’t it?”.
Democracy itself is in its old age, and even the “mixed constitution” of the American Constitution has been defeated by the political machines.
What comes next? “And now, for something completely different.” Historically, nobody has predicted the outcome of the sort of change we’re looking at now, and (no surprise) I can’t either.
As for Parry’s article, he has quite a handle on the burning issues of the 1930s. Those issues are a dead letter, their recommendations have been tried and have not even failed — just collapsed into farce and warfare. Now, we’re into the blind thrashing around stage, where we empower one new dominant group after another, hoping that at least one will succeed in restoring normality. If you want to see another time when this was true, try Aristophanes plays: “The council woman” and “Lysistrata” and “The Birds” in particular. Athens was caught up in a 30 years war that killed half its citizens and destroyed Athens’ Golden Age, nobody could figure out how to end the war, and Aristophanes is arguably showing how desperately foolish the Athenians became.
Just like us — you’ve noticed that the US is now banning free speech in order to stop the genocide of transsexuals, which is apparently (Parry notwithstanding) that most severely threatens the US.
Capitalist states can’t wage wars against each other? Lenin predicted second inter imperialist war to come.
I know very little about Dugin, however, it is clear that we won’t get out of this mess by “democracy”. Just look at our current Western “leaders” (puppets), they are all sluts, faggots or browns. It’s like the Puppetmasters don’t even care anymore to fool their audience with believable shabbos goys. They may just as well put up a big neon sign: “F**K OFF AND DIE ALREADY WHITEY!”
Degenerate Americans who never read any Marxist Leninist theory blame Marxism for degeneracy of own capitalism.
I’ve heard Dugin explicitly deny belief in biology, so he doesn’t accept racial groups as biological groupings, but as some kind of cultural phenomena. He must have never been a farmer.
In a way your comment might be more poignant than the nonetheless interesting article I read. It would be interesting to have a conversation with Dugin over a tea or coffee for sure, regardless of what people think of him. I’ve recently been feeling that viewing the current conflict in Ukraine and between the great powers through the lens of WWII is incorrect and inappropriate. Moreover, viewing it through the lens of 20th century ideologies is also incorrect. This conflict is not ideological but civilizational. It’s all about the “powerful” and “powerless”. It’s basically Jewish power versus the world. As a small minority they’ll eventually lose. I greatly look forward to that day.
Hilariously distracting turn of phrase in third graf. I did not know IEDs had hands. Didn’t read a word after that.
I wouldn’t be surprised if he did. What I wrote was just the impression I got from what I read of his writings. He doesn’t seem to always be consistent except in his Russian chauvinism.
By “can’t get into politics,” I mean cannot form independent political groups and take action.
Mentally, socially, culturally whatever it is, Americans find it easier to form crossfit groups than a group dedicated to affordable housing.
What comes next is decay or revolution.
Not civil war or balkanisation. Americans have too little solidarity to form fighting groups.
He peddles a form of liberalism. It’s quite obvious.
At least he mentioned it.
You can’t expect a public figure in the United States to call out Jewish tribalism the same as an anonymous comment.
Blockading your mind from new information because of prejudice is exactly how the elites want the public to act.
“stopped reading righf there” comments ought to embarrass the stopped reader not be a point of pride. you stopped reading because you are lazy.
Jewish emigration was facilitated much earlier than at the break up of the USSR:
“The Jackson–Vanik amendment to the Trade Act of 1974 is a 1974 provision in United States federal law intended to affect U.S. trade relations with countries with non-market economies (originally, countries of the Soviet Bloc) that restrict freedom of Jewish emigration and other human rights.”
According to Margarita Buber-Neumann who survived both the National Socialist and the Communist camps: Stalin = Hitler + Asia
Well said…I might add the love of power.
Correct, the current destruction of the West has nothing to do with Marxism and everything to do with rapaciousness and megalomania.
Lenin was sent as a weapon to destroy Russia by Imperialist Germany and funded by bankers from NYC.
Sorry, but it has always been leftists/Marxists who have been at the forefront of Globo homo, promiscuity and general degeneracy in the West. This was also the case in early Soviet Russia.
“This was also the case in early Soviet Russia.”
The case of Karensky’s masonic bourgeoise regime. Bolsheviks stopped it.
Killing Dugan’s daughter on Russian soil is a declaration of war against Russia…..
How exactly was Alexander Dugan a threat to America? Because Vladimir is a “threat” to America…
How is Vladimir Putin a “threat” to America?…Answer:Because Vladimir Putin will fight back against threats to destroy Russia…….THE UNITED STATES IS AT WAR WITH RUSSIA….THE UNITED STATES WANTS TO MURDER RUSSIA….
Honesty…The US needs to be destroyed….so it can no longer wage war against Russia….
America is a “civilization” that worships the filthy stinking anus…..America will be destroyed…..internal collapse is coming…
The continuation of war between Germany and Russia benefited only anglo Saxon and French pluctocrats who used Russians as cannon fodder to enhance their interests.
I read one book by Dugin, though I enjoyed reading it and it brought up a couple of novel ideas, I found it very disappointing for someone who’d been called “Putin’s brain.” I hoped it would be far more right-leaning than Putin’s public rhetoric. Yet Dugin didn’t write a word about Jewish power, which brands him as insignificant in my book.
Anthony Blinken is a War Criminal….
When America breaks up to pieces after the 2024 POTUS Election…breakup will be accelerated….
Eventual Spetznatz Russian Special Forces will be in America to take control of America’s nukes….Along with China’s special forces……..Anthony Blinken will be hunted down by Spetznatz…captured….taken to Russia….followed by War Crime prosecution…..
Jews hate Orthodox Christianity so much that use sub-nazis to attack the church… and no complaint from US conzos who worship Jews as their master.
Oh, yo! Damn, have not seen such parry since 2019.
https://www.unz.com/article/debunking-myths-of-red-brown-alliances/
Boy you still parry the mash of left-right and wouldnt have a clue whats wong and whats lite.
Germs – HIS devine seedlings – never had any colonies, let alone colons and columnes full of parry. Germs had protectorates and made good inside out and outside in; protecting from Jew & hyena (Anglo-Sucksns). Such them true black fellows still wish today Wilhelms would rebirth, return and help build. Same with the noodle boys. Macaronis are the best brick layers and built and built and built, not just the most beautiful towns in Africa, till they were forced out by the negative force, the destroyers of everything good: Jew & hyena; Jew & pomies (sucking parries), the cross of mankind, be it on the black or on the white continent, be it in Indian lands or in India, be it in the oceans or in the skies: Parry, just a mash up in every sense of the word to have his goodie hole and his badass; gracious me give me a break!
All you are and all you have been, since the last Celts went down and pom bastards started vegetating under Jewish crowns, is G R E E D.
What have you made out of the beautiful Americas?
What have you made out of beautiful Africa?
What have you made out of India?
What have you made out of Australasia?
What have you made out of the World?
Butt scam about „Lebensraum im Osten“; what a parry!
I stopped reading at the very next sentence:
Apparently the author hasn’t noticed how the whole persecution/antisemitism scam works.
Though the author passes over Bolshevism as if it were a brief political blip in Russia similar to the Tea Party movement in the United States, the Bolshevik mass murder of 66 million Russian Christians and the complete dispossession of the Russian people was not only the greatest crime in human history, it provides a stark example of how the persecution scam works.
In the first heady days in the immediate aftermath of the October 1917 Bolshevik takeover, the Jewish press in the West openly celebrated the World Revolution and gloried in the new workers’ utopia as the product of Jewish genius and Jewish “discontent.” The mainstream press under Jewish control was also congratulatory. Then the horrors of what the depraved Bolshevik monsters were doing to the Russian Christians began to leak out and the Jews publicly fell silent. There was a spasmodic denial or two, then the Jewish voices rose again in unity, but now leveling cries of persecution against any gentile who mentioned what they themselves were boasting of just a few weeks earlier.
Now that I think about it, it’s clear the author probably has noticed how the persecution scam works, he just lacks the courage to stand up to it.
The very hallmark of “rational”-ism is the compulsive over-thinking of everything. The outcome, finally, is exactly the sort of terminal stage Organic Functional paralysis that is today dooming the “civilized” peoples to near-term annihilation.
Because everything can be and thus must be and so will be rationalized into a kind of conceptual and semantic equality with anything and everything “else,” nothing can be effectively distinguished from anything else as something that might be more likely, in any given circumstances, to be a more sensible Way. If, in the final analysis, any old way is as good, rationally-speaking, as any other, not only is The TAO, The Way itself lost….the very possibility of it even existing is eradicated from within the suffocating confines of the “rational”-ist monoverse.
So illusory “options” get exercised according to the momentarily loudest and/or most violently insisted-upon “rationale.” Escalation to some “final solution” is, rationally, inevitable.
Having fought and bought and thought their way into this Biological DEAD END, the domesticated peoples are presently caught-up in their last futile attempts to escape the “self”-inflicted trap by a sort of doubling-down on it all….double your guns, double your money, double your thinking.
Meantime, here in Indian Country, it is simply each Beat of The Drum, one Note following another in the HeartSong and one Step following another in the MatingDance of Life Herownself and Love Hisownself….as it has been and will go on being. Beyond the marginally-useful, because strictly-limited operations of the “rational” faculty, we live and breathe as Free Wild Peoples of every Kind in, of, and as The LovingLoving Arrangement of Earth and Sky.
So too, of-course, might our currently captivated Human Relatives who can get over the organically-crippling sickness that is for each their very own too-precious “self.” Those needing a “reason” to do that are invited to just take a clear-eyed, strong-stomached look at the “world” all their guns and money and thinking have made for them and their children….especially The Children.
As 54% of US adults have the comprehension level of 6th graders or 12 yr olds and a full 21% are functionally illiterate, here is the low IQ version of Dugin for UNZ retard droolers screaming “MaRxIsm”
from Dugin’s 2021 book “The Great Awakening VS The Great Reset”
Theoretical Principles of the Great Awakening (Based on the Fourth Political Theory)
18 January 2021
Liberalism is in decay and Now we can easily observe that the global world order is in decay. Globalism is collapsing. Globalists are trying to destroy the United States in order to promote their candidate, to save their agenda at any price.
We are dealing with the clear totalitarian face of the liberal ideology. It is a liberal dictatorship, because it demands to cancel history — Plato, Aristotle, the Middle Ages, modern authors, modern philosophies … anything that doesn’t coincide with the more and more narrowing criteria of radical and totally intolerant liberalism.
These are clear signs of totalitarianism. The Nazis (National Socialists) demanded to cancel Jews. The Soviet totalitarianism (socialist totalitarianism) demanded to cancel dissidents. Now, the liberal ideology demands to cancel everything — or almost everything, except Black Lives Matter, Soros’ LGBT+, and some chosen groups of minorities, at the price of prohibiting everybody else. So, that is agony.
What is agony? Liberalism is agony.
■ First political theory: Liberalism
■ Second political theory: Communism
■ Third political theory: Fascism — or National Socialism
Liberalism has won over its rivals in the twentieth century (communism and fascism).
■ These three theories represent political modernity — Western political modernity.
■ The agony of liberalism includes the approaching end of Western political modernity, because neither communism nor fascism could be regarded as real alternatives to liberalism.
■ Communism and fascism have a common basis with liberalism: Materialism — Atheism — Progressivism — A purely materialistic approach to the human being.
If we choose to fight Globalism with Fascism or Communism we will lose because both are alternatives of the past. And they belong to the same family of Western modern ideologies.
Our fight is not against Modernity, But against Western Political Modernity or Liberalism.
The Fourth Political Theory is an invitation to search for the alternative to this falling liberalism in decay, which intended to be the main and unique, the one and only political ideology from Fukuyama’s moment of The End of History and the Last Man (1992) until now.
■ After the end of communism and fascism in the twentieth century, liberalism became the only political ideology, which intended to be a kind of universal language — something totally imposed, with the free market, liberal democracy, parliamentarianism, individualism, technology, icon culture and LGBT+ ethics. All that was regarded as universal. And now this universality is ending.
■ The Fourth Political Theory is an invitation to critique and fight the first political theory, neither from the socialist or communist position, nor from the nationalist-fascist or National Socialist position — because both belong to the past. This is an invitation to overcome Western political modernity by fighting liberalism, because it still exists.
■ We precisely choose liberalism to be the representation and symbol of absolute evil because it is still here, and liberals still intend to organise the world under the rule of the liberal transnational elite.
■ Liberalism is worse than communism and fascism not only from the theoretical point of view. It is worse because it exists here still. Communism and fascism belong to the past — they are chimeras, they are just leftovers, residues of political history.
■ So, first of all, we need to fight liberalism. We need to bring this lasting decay to the end, we need to overcome liberalism, we need to finish with liberalism — with the open society, with human rights, with all the products of this Soros-style liberal system based on individualism, materialism, progressivism, on the total alienation of the people and extinction of social links.
■ Individualism is the last word of liberalism. So, we need to finish with the concept of individualism.
We should not come to the past alternatives. We shouldn’t fall into the trap of communism or fascism. We need to imagine something radically different — not only from liberalism, but from Western political modernity taken altogether. This is the Fourth Political Theory.
Today, our main enemy is represented by liberalism, by the open society, by Soros-funded groups of liberal terrorists — which could be regarded as leftists or far-left fascists. And others: liberals are trying to use religious and ethnic groups. For example, when fighting Islam as a sacred religious tradition, globalists are using some Muslims in order to destroy the European identity.
When fighting against all kinds of national identity, they use some ethnic identities (for example, Uyghurs, Ukrainians) in order to destabilise the alternative poles that don’t belong to their vision of a unipolar, liberal world.
The main idea of fighting liberalism is to fight all Western political modernity. That is the enemy. The Fourth Political Theory invites everybody to fight.
The name of the enemy has absolute importance. If we name the enemy as the modern Western political ideologies or Western political modernity, we already are on the right path.
■ We don’t invite people to fight against the West. Not at all. The West is not an enemy.
■ We don’t invite people to fight against modernity as such — for example, the contemporary state of affairs in some societies. Because we have different societies, different civilisations that exist in the modern world and don’t belong to Western modernity. We can actually live in the modern world outside Western political modernity.
■ So, we are challenging neither the West nor modernity: we are challenging Western modernity. And that’s a kind of form based on the anti-Christian, anti-spiritual, anti-traditional, anti-sacred turn in Western history that coincided — not by chance — with colonialism, the beginning of the Enlightenment [here he is anti-MARXIST], and so on.
This modern era of the scientific, materialist, colonialist period of Western history is the evil; this is the problem.
Western modernity in general — in the philosophical, scientific, geopolitical and economic senses. It coincides with capitalism, because capitalism, materialism, atheism and colonialism re-introduced slavery [I WOULD ADD USURY HERE ALSO] after hundreds of years of the non-existence of slavery in Western Christian culture. Slavery was reintroduced by Western political modernity.
Sometimes it seems that slavery in colonial times, in America and Africa, was a phenomenon continued from the ancient tradition of the pre-modern West. Not at all. It was a completely new institution — a modern institution. Modern slavery is the path of the so-called “democratic liberal” modernity.
we cannot reach some new kind of universalism. And we shouldn’t, we don’t need that. We need to open the perspectives for each civilisation, each culture to create their own political future, apart from something that is imposed as inevitable, as a destiny by colonial Western modernity. – END
hope that clears it up for the idiots on here.
“For America, eurasia is the chief geopolitical prize”
The Grand Chessboard by Carter’s brain was just so much warmed over Mackinder’s World Island (eurasia with its vast population, resources, and energy) theory. There have been numerous attempts by various marauding island empires (Brits, Japs, Yanks, etc) to penetrate and conquer the World Island….all failing miserably. The distinct ancient civilizations sealing off the World Island (Russia, China, India) are now nuclear armed, so the greedy yank globohomoshlomos have zero chance of conquering the World Island. Instead the attacking anal fecal rainbow warriors are destroying themselves, not having learned the World Island with its vast reources cannot be conquered. Any attempt at penetration and conquest is suicidal and doomed to failure. Eventually, even the vile pathetic euroweanie satraps will cast off their chains and take their rightful place as the western most territories of the World Island.
“[A]ll traditionalists should be against the West and globalization, as well as against the imperialist politics of the United States.”
As a traditionalist of NW European descent living in the “Southern Cone” of South America, I find myself leaning in that direction, although geographically and culturally, we here are in the Western hemisphere and were influenced strongly by the values of the traditional “West”, by which I infer is meant western Europe and North America. Perhaps we here should consider ourselves part of the “global south”, although we have little in common with Africa and/or India. As for North American present-day “values”, well, outside of large cities, we have less and less in common with them either.
The late Uruguayan poet Mario Benedetti may have been a Marxist, but his perhaps best-known poem, popularized in song by Joan Manuel Serrat, is spot on: El Sur También Existe (“The South Exists as Well”). We’re something of a well-kept secret from our northern neighbors, who tend to conflate us with Central America, which aside from the language has little in common with the Southern Cone.
The jew cries out in pain as he strikes
No surprise that a braindead communist accepts the lies of jews, even if they were exploitative billionaires he claims to oppose. That seems to be the best way to get commies on board with capitalism, tell them the billionaires are jews and they’ll tell us about how evil white rednecks oppress those billionaires.
Under Mao, average Chinese grew adept at reading between the lines of the People’s Daily to gain a more accurate view of what was happening in the world around them. I think we are in the same boat.
There are a couple of positive signs I’ve been able to extract from between the lines that, to me, anyway, give cause for hope.
Though Putin doesn’t “name the Jew,” it seems to me he is fully aware of the power and aims of the Talmudic conspiracy as described in The Controversy of Zion.
https://www.unz.com/book/douglas_reed__the-controversy-of-zion/
The reason I say that is because of a speech I watched him give to an audience in Moscow. At one point, appearing to go off script, he said that this power he had been speaking of that had seized control in the West would sacrifice Israel itself in order to achieve its ends. “Believe it or not,” he said, “it’s true.”
So first of all, he’s right. Israel was never the end goal for the Talmudic conspiracy. It was only ever the means to the end, which is absolute and permanent power over all humanity. Whether that power is finally physically located in Israel proper is of secondary concern.
And, second, it is an amazing statement for the president of Russia, which has, by far, the deepest experience of the nature of the Khazar Jews (who, after all, have no ancestral connection to Israel), to make.
Another interesting “between the lines” was the one-to-one meeting between Putin and Trump. Remember who went ape shit over that meeting? Chuck Schumer went so far as to threaten the interpreters with arrest and force them to disclose the contents of the conversation!
A third interesting “between the lines” is the sudden emergence of China in an uncharacteristically Chinese way. The trip to Moscow last week, the explicit military alliance, this isn’t the usual “long game” that China expertly plays. Something has changed and Western experts are openly wondering what triggered it, showing that the Chinese action was unexpected. Was it the Nordstream sabotage? Was it the threat of tactical nuclear strikes? Something to do with Taiwan? Nothing the experts have offered so far has enough weight to force China off their game into an open military alliance with Russia. There is only one thing I can think of. Somewhere in the Chinese leadership there is an understanding of what Putin was talking about when he spoke of the power that has seized control of the West, and of the ruthless, existential threat to humanity that that power is.
So perhaps Asia, with the global South, is coalescing into the only power on Earth capable of defeating the military power under the control of the rabbis. Unfortunately, the people of the West appear doomed to remain as helpless cattle awaiting slaughter at the hands of whomever.
Yes, Dugin is a marginal theorist in the RF. The reality never stops Ukie terrorists, though. Bandits are bandits, criminal Kiev regime is criminal, water is wet.
You are an optimist. As things go, euroweanies are a lot more likely to preside over Europe morphing into Islamic Sultanate than to become human.
Libtardism is a mental disorder. Mental disorders are incurable.
What is Marxism?
Please tell me the precise, universally accepted definition and meaning of Liberalism.
There is so much incorrect, and stupidity in your comment, that your assignment must be to purvey your trash to the (completely brainwashed American audience, who, even on so-called ‘alternate media’ will not recognize, let alone attempt to correct.
By the numbers:
1. Russia of 1914 had 120 million occupants. [census figures for that year].
2. Subtract 60-66 million from 1917-1940 (the beginning of WW II for Russia -Operation Barbarossa).
3. Subtract from the single, & then the tens column, leaves Russia with 60 million remaining cittizens -with which to resist a nation Germany of 89 million, and all the others.
Romania – 2 million Army at service of Gemany)
Finland – 100,000 ish
Italy – an army group of 400,000
Hungary – 1 million soldiers to Russian front
Slovakia – 1 division
Bulgaria – entire army garrisoning Greece & Yugoslavia
Japan – 2 million army in Manchuria (watched by 500,000 Siberian Russian Army)
– earlier, in 1939, Russia won a large battle against Japan in Mongolia.
Subtract 30 million Russians killed in WW II, and in 1945 Russia had only 30 million residents. Haaaa!!
Stalin’s Gulag prison system was utilized to force labor to areas where large construction projects were under way. In America, workers have a ‘democratic’ choice to STARVE in economically depressed areas, or to move to where they may attain employment.
Djugashvili and his Stalinist Bureaucrats’ Gulag was morally indefensible, as are all variances of forced labor movement. The claims from Solzhenitsyn, or assorted American propagandists of 60+ million murders of Russians by their government are clearly inaccurate.
When Germany invaded the Soviet Union in 1940, the #1 complaint of German Generals (as expressed in their Memoirs was of that they were outnumbered in every battle they engaged in). And their observations were correct. In the battles of Moscow, Stalingrad, and Kursk, Russia and Zhukov‘s repeated strategy was to overwhelm attacking German armies with vast numbers of fresh and well equipped Russian forces. At Stalingrad, the Russians accumulated a reserve of 1 million soldiers, with which they used to surround the German 6th Army of 250,000, with the results we all recall.
When Germans invaded the Soviet Union in 1940, they entered a Prosperous, Progressive, and Populous nation. These are facts, documented by the German Generals, themselves. The Russians managed to keep a half million (500,000) soldiers on their Eastern Front throughout the War. After Germany surrendered, the Soviet Army had enough energy to destroy Japan’s Manchurian Army of 2 million.
In 2023, America hosts the largest Gulag Prison system on the planet (of 2.1 million), which exceeds the prison population of any other nation. America also retains several Torture Camps, one abandoned in Abu Graib, and another in active use, in Guantanamo.
Bolshevism was not only Jewish.
However, the Entity maintains in excess of 10,000 Palestinian Political Prisoners.
I will end with a reminder, that Adolf Hitler was a Zionist Agent, from 1914, and the entire Nazi movement was organized and financed by the Zionist Oligarchs, as is the Nazi trained Army in East Europe today. The Azov Batallions are ideologically educated/brainwashed, as were their predecessors in the 1920-30s Germany.
In 2023, History repeats itself. The patterns are the same. Even the Zionist Entity Haaretz Newspaper has expressed horror at Jews supporting Nazis.
https://www.bing.com/ck/a?!&&p=ce2ed016860fc0b3JmltdHM9MTY4MDA0ODAwMCZpZ3VpZD0xMzg4YzE3Zi1lNTBkLTY1ZmEtMWI1ZS1kMzljZTRiMzY0NDUmaW5zaWQ9NTE2Ng&ptn=3&hsh=3&fclid=1388c17f-e50d-65fa-1b5e-d39ce4b36445&psq=haaretz+article+condemning+jews+supporting+nazis+in+ukraine&u=a1aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuaGFhcmV0ei5jb20vaXNyYWVsLW5ld3MvMjAxOC0wNy0wOS90eS1hcnRpY2xlL3JpZ2h0cy1ncm91cHMtZGVtYW5kLWlzcmFlbC1zdG9wLWFybWluZy1uZW8tbmF6aXMtaW4tdGhlLXVrcmFpbmUvMDAwMDAxN2YtZTA4MC1kN2IyLWE3N2YtZTM4NzBlMWMwMDAw&ntb=1
Get your facts straight!
No chance of that happening. Demographics-empirical data-show the percentage and numbers of natives of all European countries in constant decline. By low birth rate and emigration.
Maybe. The best course of action would be to discard all political labels and categories. All of them. Then construct or find universal principles and implement them, starting with a blank sheet.
The problem is that people in the West are brought up to adopt and internalize pre-existing symbols, constructs, ideals, and categories. That is the failing of you prescriptive advice.
Much better progress would be to start with truly Universal ideas and construct working, practical ideas and structures. That, I propose, would be the ideas and teachings of The Buddha, C. G. Jung and others.
Your Western Aristotelian, and its derivatives are less useful. People have to change INTERNALLY for general improvement in the commonweal. This is the pervasive theme of Jung, where harmony and cohesion are created and maintained by the right individual Consciousness in sync and meshed with a Universal Consciousness.
Your proposals, all external, objects, and finite lumps, will fail as they have always done.
In total management of power plants, having the pieces to repair, maintain, overhaul of the various machines and systems only is not enough. One must have TECHNIQUE and the KNOWLEDGE OF WISDOM TO MAKE SUCCESS.
Dugin has never been any kind of Putin’s brain [1][2] – that’s just MSM propaganda. Putin never met with Dugin. Dugin is a Russian patriot, thus not compatible with Putin who is West/Turkey-pleasing, 5th column liberal globalist, trained by Klaus Schwab [3][4] in the 90s, and put at the helm of Russia in 2000 by a decree.
[1] Alexander Dugin was never Putin’s brain – The Post
https://unherd.com/thepost/alexander-dugin-was-never-putins-brain/
Excerpt: Each article is illustrated with individual photos of the philosopher, and individual photos of the president. There are no photos of Putin and Dugin together, because the two have never met.
Excerpt: By 2017, Dugin was openly critical of the president — in an interview that year, he derided Putin for holding an incoherent worldview: “I think that even he doesn’t understand what he’s saying because now he’s a liberal, now a conservative; now he’s for sovereignty, now for globalism, and now against globalism.” As of 2022, Dugin has no personal or professional links to the Kremlin. “Those who think that I stand on the periphery of power are correct.” Dugin stated a few years ago. “I have no influence. I don’t know anybody, have never seen anyone, I just write my books, and am a Russian thinker, nothing more. I write books, somebody reads them.”
[2] ‘Putin’s brain’ says he doesn’t have Putin’s ear. Do we know who does? – CSMonitor.com
https://www.csmonitor.com/World/Europe/2015/0127/Putin-s-brain-says-he-doesn-t-have-Putin-s-ear.-Do-we-know-who-does
Excerpt: Dugin’s insistence that he has no direct knowledge of Kremlin inner-workings seems particularly poignant, since he is named most frequently by Western Kremlin-watchers as the key influence on Putin’s geopolitical views over the past decade. After Russia annexed Crimea and supported pro-Russian rebellions in eastern Ukraine last year, Foreign Affairs magazine went so far as to label the charismatic ultranationalist as “Putin’s Brain.”
Excerpt: Dugin says he never enjoyed special access to the corridors of power, and whatever input he had was shut down last summer when he and other “patriots” were forcibly sidelined by the Kremlin. Furthermore, he has no idea who may be helping Putin come up with his “incoherent” and “contradictory” Ukraine policies these days. “Anything anyone tells you about how Putin decides things is either disinformation, or error,” he adds.
Here’s Klaus Schwab in 2017 speaking of Putin and Angela [4] as, at the time, WEF’s Young Global Leaders (i.e. euphemism for recruits of course), as well as one younger one, Justin Trudeau (Canada’s PM). He mentioned Putin and Angela again in 2019, in the same context, along with Tony Blair [3].
[3] Klaus Schwab in 2019 speaks of Putin (1952), Tony Blair (1953), and Angela Merkel (1954) as his Young Global Leaders back in the 90s – fast forward to 1:14
Video Link
[4] “So we penetrate the cabinets”, Klaus Schwab in 2017 … | Twitter
Regards, Anon001 – Comments Archive @ The Unz Review
https://www.unz.com/comments/all/?commenterfilter=Anon001
Hitler and the Zionists shared common goals. Both wanted Jews to leave Europe.
Solzhenitsyn’s methodical breakdown of where he gets his figure of 66 million Russian victims of communism over 70 years gains, in my mind, credibility not just from his evenhanded treatment of the whole period, but from the Western/Jewish reaction to it. The book was actively suppressed by Jews in the West, by itself nearly an infallible sign of accuracy. Moreover, all the arguments against it, such as yours above, have a uniformity that is generally a tell-tale sign of a Talmudic propaganda campaign.
So, on the one hand, we have the Nobel laureate who was there and who has a sterling reputation for honesty and sober mindedness, and on the other hand we have the mass of Khazar Jews, whose religion itself advocates deception on behalf of Jews, calling Solzhenitsyn a liar and “proving” his figures wrong.
It’s a pretty easy call which should be believed.
If these are Dugin’s theories and convictions, than chances are slim that Putin would have spent time and effort to meet him, let alone use Dugin’s advices for policies to shape Russia’s way ahead. We can rest assured in the certainty that Dugin was NOT Putin’s Rasputin, and that claims of the opposite are ziocon disinformation.
These days, he who controls the medias, controls the thoughts and actions of the people. I remebmer reading that the majority of Millennials got their news of events of the world from sources like John Stuart of The Daily Show or Bill Maher; in other words, Jewish driven “comedy” productions.
There are many sidewalk interviews of college students from many campuses, including the “Elite” ones. The lack of knowledge, or even the lack of motivation to “know”, explore, or exercise curiosity is shocking.
DUH:
Video Link
Video Link
They are all voters, close to 100% Democrats. They are the future of somewhere, something.
Find an alternative country to flee to when it becomes necessary. Or go full survivalist and form secret groups for mutual defense and offense.
Words don’t have precise, universally accepted definitions.
America and Russia, side by side, is like comparing a turd to a crème brûlée.
Remembrance of the NATO bombing of Serbia:
Video Link
Alexand Dugin – A small and bitter man who supports state violence and coercion. He doesn’t care if it comes from right or left as long as it is anti-Western.
So basically a Russian Andrew Anglin.
Would be nice if God averaged men out in the height department. If Dugin was a foot taller he would probably be an English prof.
God’s plan I guess (shrug).
Stupid comedy but more truth than in mass media.
Video Link
Words are multi-valent. “Marxism” can mean belief that some kind of socialism (the ownership of the means of production by the state or by the people at large) is the best system. It can mean belief in Marx’s theory of history. It can mean a belief in the goodness of the man himself. It can mean the whole gigantic body of belief, knowledge, organization, and action which either stems from or claims to stem from Marx.
Only in the last case, can you claim any relationship between contemporary American degeneracy and Marxism. Even there, it’s pretty thin. “Cultural Marxism” is the appropriation of some Gramscian ideas and techniques to serve America’s elite. It’s named after Marx, and Gramsci was a commie, but, seriously, considering Cultural Marxism to be Marxism is on a par with considering Social Security to be Marxism, stupidity-wise.
Of course, you’re some moronic libertardian or “Reagan Conservative,” so, pretty much par for the course.
Physically, Americans who try to solo in politics are crushed. Same with groups. Consider the 6/2 setup. Consider the parents designated as “domestic terrorists” for speaking at school board meetings. Consider that NPR is now advising trans-people to arm themselves against Christians ( https://townhall.com/tipsheet/juliorosas/2023/03/29/tucker-carlson-explains-why-transgender-ideology-and-christianity-are-incompatible-n2621259 ).
Americans might have an average IQ of only somewhere around 100, but they aren’t suicidal. Note that the Trump election was followed by open borders with Mexico and Canada, a measure that the Left has said is genocidal to Trump voters’ society. Note that there are another thousand or so people that DOJ intends to track down and arrest, for being in Washington DC on 2021/01/06 and under suspicion of a misdemeanor offence.
So enough of “If the Americans would only stand up and charge the machine guns in the midst of an artillery stonk, they’d win” kind of stuff stuff. They’d be dead, is what they’d be, and if you insist on trying to incite that sort of thing, well, try it yourself first.
21st century is about the pathological pathologizing the normal.
It used to be homosexuality and tranny stuff were regarded as deviant behaviors.
But, Jews tagged the medical term -phobia to healthy normal negative reactions to homosexuality and tranny stuff and pathologized reality-based sanity.
So, guys dong-bunging each other or cutting off their dicks is ‘medically sound’, but if you oppose promotion of such, you suffer from a -phobia.
Michel Foucault wrote about how institutions, social and medical, use their authority to pathologize and criminalize certain kinds of behaviors. One would think the lesson from this would have been that institutions should be more careful in diagnosing what is sane and what is insane. Also, even if abnormal, certain behaviors should be tolerated.
Instead, the institutionalization of medicine and mental health has been reversed so that the insane are now pathologizing the sane. So, any normal reaction is -phobic this and -phobic that. This insanity has been pushed so far that even 55% of so-called conservatives are for ‘gay marriage’, including Butt-Chuck Murry and Butt-Tucker Carlson.
https://trendingpoliticsnews.com/breaking-spokeswoman-for-katie-hobbs-resigns-after-posting-threat-against-transphobes-mace/
Christianity without God.
I’ve been procuring Dugin’s books, in English, because I want to know what he has to say, first hand, assuming I can comprehend it, post-translation.
The fact that his work is effectively banned in the West, tells me that it’s important, piercing, and perceived as dangerous to the status quo, which make me want it all the more.
In this modern, fake world of ((freedom and democracy)), the mere idea of banning books is laughably desperate and childish.
I don’t know if Dugin is right or wrong, crazy or sane, etc., but the murdering of his daughter was an outrageous act of barbarism, that should not go unpunished!
Literally, I’d like to see some people hanged for it.
Agree agree agree thank you thank you thank you.
He peddles a form of liberalism. It’s quite obvious.
I’m afraid I’ll have to agree with Wokechoke here. Duggy has circled himself back to liberalism:
Hitler’s racism is only one form of racism. This is the most obvious straightforward and biological and most repulsive. there are other forms of racism — cultural (asserting there are high and low cultures), civilizational (dividing people into those civilized and those insufficiently uncivilized)
So it’s racist to suggest that primitive people exist. A core belief of liberalism.
An aboriginal banging a drum is no different than Beethoven. In fact the Aboriginal doesn’t really exist. He is just proto man like the rest of us but with frizzy hair and a tan. Sure his tribe might not have understood that sex was connected to childbirth until Whites arrived but that’s just a coincidence. He was about to get there.
Whatever Duggy. Him and our US liberal intellectuals should be air dropped in Haiti. No such thing as race or uncivilized cultures so you should have no problem turning the place into a progressive utopia.
From a Marxist point of view
Author should also be air dropped. From a Marxist point of view? Good lord give it a rest already. It doesn’t work. Maybe Marx should have taken an Econ 101 class instead of spending so much time banging his maid.
Rest assured the Russians are keeping score. The Russians also have the means to play this “game” as well. And they will–in time. Maybe the Russians have already evened the score? Same thing with the destruction of the Nord Stream pipeline. The Russians know who did it. The Russians are smart enough to know the US MSM is a Propaganda mouthpiece for the Deep State.
A marxist author can hardly claim political independence since its reason for being is to overthrow the regimes of the goyim and seize their means of production, thus fulfilling the talmudic injunction to bring the goyim to the feet of Yahweh, dead or enslaved, it matters not which. This also explains how judaist Wall Street and FDR could pay the USSR to achieve a hidden, religious goal.
This marxist writer also ignores the latest pronouncements from the slippery Dugin, which explicitly call for return to control of the Russian state and civil society through hereditary monarchy, thus covertly agreeing with Hegel’s ‘Philosophy of Right’ (1821, tr. Nisbet, 1991) that private property is necessary for the free and full development of the human personality and the security of the state.
Neither multiethnicity nor eurasianism is compatible with the true integrity of Russian monarchy because the former includes the hidden cabals of talmudists/theocrats (judaist and islamic) and the latter presupposes cognitive/racial integration of mongolids and caucasids, which is demonstrably neurophysically untenable as well as being a primary marxist illusion and delusion.
As for the actual (hidden) enemy of Russia and Mankind now evident in NATO’s proxy war, the Russians themselves (Putin and Patrushev) are even more confused by liberalism than ever, as Dugin himself has complained repeatedly of late. Since Dugin’s “Eurasian Empire” is self-defeating (as above), the outcome of this war for the freedom and development of Man is problematic at best:
https://www.academia.edu/76372363/To_Sevastopol_With_Love
Note that to read the article simply SCROLL DOWN; no sign-in or sign-on is necessary. Thanks.
Google it.
I’m not sure Gramsci wanted the same kind of people to march through the institutions as did march through them in the West.
Hang Dugin’s hired bodyguards, who let assassins place a bomb underneath his automobile (later driven away by Dugina) when they were supposed to be doing their job. Evidently, they have not yet been arrested or even interrogated.
Christianity without God.
But if that were the case then it would be a secular but passive philosophy.
It isn’t passive at all. The liberal ideology fully believes in using government force to obtain its goals.
Liberals are also far more egalitarian than Christians.
The Christian Bible accepts gender. Liberals believe that gender is mostly artificial and just as many boys would be playing with dolls if not for TV and the patriarchy. They seem to think DNA can be flipped with some hormone pills and a penis made out of a thumb. It is very much anti-human biology.
Liberalism should be described as equalitarian. They want equal outcomes or as close as the government can get them.
But that would still only be a partial definition. They are also very much anti-White. They profess to want equality but their dreamiest dream would be a society where White men are at the bottom. They want White men to be subjugated not just in society but also in male/female relationships.
Nietzsche described them best (referring to secular Western egalitarians) as an alliance of the resentful. An alliance for power. The resent the biological reality of men and Whites the most. White men are the most hated beings to them. The devil on earth.
Since the assassination of Dugin’s daughter I’ve been looking for a longish essay that would explore his thinking and influence and the reason why the Zionist mafia regime in Kiev and its CIA partners would want to kill him. Thanks, Max Parry.
“… the shallow state of Western left-wing politics as a whole.”
The Anglo-American and western European Left serves as a political-action arm of the Anglo-American shadow state which operates on behalf of certain Western and Israeli oligarchs who dominate the global financial system. The Left of the West has also become a cult that has infiltrated institutions and media to enforce groupthink discipline on the climate, race, and gender, subjects that have become priorities for the oligarchs who’ve become colloquially known as globohomo.
Of course, Degrellian meant to write “true” rather than “try” in front of opposition. Otherwise, his sentence would make no sense.
Indeed, even with that correction, his comment is completely misdirectionist. The History of Fascism & Fascists displays their complete subservience to Capitalism & Materialism. Indeed, his statement is Nonsense. Hitler & Mussolini, and our Democraps, and Republicant Gangs, serve and served Capitalism. Any claims of a political group to Oppose capitalism, by necessity, implies that there exists another economic system for them to support.
The Keith Woods video lecture omits one of Mussolini‘s most onerous acts, as if it has no bearing on the claims of honor, of childlike innocence for Mussolini’s Fascists, (supported in this deed by Hitler and his Fascists). The Invasion and Butchery of Ethiopia (poison gas and all), destroys the claims of innocence and theoretic legitimacy of Mussolini and his ‘logical’ (almost cute) philosophy.
For Hitler, or a German Patriot, Anschlus for the German people is understandable, BUT where does the absorption of Czechoslovakia fit in? And both Zionist puppets, Hitler & Mussolini, participated in overthrowing the Spanish Republic. [Shades of the Zio/Azov/NATO imperialist overthrow of the elected government in Kiev].
Key point:
An ideology is to be measured by its deeds. What an ideology, and its leaders do, is the measure of their worth. Morality is the ultimate measure of a philosophy, and of an economic system. Religions are measured by their Deeds. If they closed your Church or Synagogue doors during the Planneddemic, your denomination, your declared religion, no longer believes in a supreme being, or in a life based on Spiritual belief, but on obeying, on following, on committing any horror you are ordered to by the State. *God no longer exists. He cannot protect you. Only the State can do that. “Abandon all hope ye who enter here.”*
The History, the Truth of the Butchery of Ethiopia, followed by the destruction of the Spanish Republic, and the absorption of Czechoslovakia, the WWs, and of the Ethnic Cleansing of the Palestinians, and the bloody invasion of Iraq and Libya, and so many other crimes committed, are the foundation upon which all claims to saintliness of the Imperialists, or the Fascists, or the Democrap and Republicant Gangs must be judged, and condemned.
Philosophy must be judged by History, and not the other way around!
Dr. Peter J. Antonsen – nom de guerre, Durruti
“Michel Foucault”
A co-author, from beyond the grave, of the madness spreading throughout what was once known as the West. This plague of mental and spiritual illness, like all large movements — wars, revolutions — imposed by elites who’ve grown bored.
“anti-Western”
Best description of the current condition of Western Civilization.
Most Jewish articles written for their publishing monopolies when discussing Russia, seem to always equate Russia of today with its brutality of yore, the USSR. It’s the same treatment they give to white Americans and Europeans, when they throw in colonialism, slavery, lynching just to twist the thorn of hate into the side of humanity to prolong and justify endless wars covering for global monopolies and their banking cartels and corruption.
It’s enough to make you sick.
Looking through it seems like Alexander Reid Ross’ principal ideology is anti-whiteness and anti-white nativism. These people have flocked in droves to the new neocon narratives since they started the whole ‘Russiagate’ narrative against Trump when he openly talked about the State Department creating ISIS and being lukewarm on further escalation in Syria. That was the opening they needed to tie Trump to Putin (Though in 2023 few if any of the low information SJWs would be able to tell you why they have to hate Putin they just know they should) despite the fact that the neocon agenda is the real foreign influence conspiracy.
Indeed there was an amusing instance of this early on, Jared Kushner had met with several high ranking foreign diplomats at the UN, one of whom was Russian, on behalf of Netanyahu prior to Trump taking office. CNN and Wolf Blitzer (A proud Zionist who had made his career in Israel) spoke breathlessly about how Kushner had met with a Russian diplomat before Trump took office as a major scandal neglecting to even mention the whole context. Amazingly a very real Israeli influence scandal became a fictional Russian influence scandal.
Any other idea Reid claims to champion must be subservient to his principal drive to displace and punish white Western peoples and suppress any legitimacy of any collective rights or interests, particularly over their ancient homelands.
Curiously, when it comes to Israel he is more circumspect. To people like him the problem isn’t that the Palestinians are losing their homeland but rather that it is being conducted in sometimes ‘fascist’ ways. There are many such cases like him.
I don’t know if Alexander Reid Ross is Jewish, but it really seems like he is a Jewish supremacist settler colonialist supporter who was only on the left because in the West opposition to the dominant ethnic group is ‘left wing’. (It involves nice universalism from members of the core group but non-core members can express similar sentiments even if rampantly ethnocentric) Similar to how Cenk Uygur seems to actually be a far-right Turkish nationalist and if he was still living in Turkey he’d be on the far-right.
Hmm, the JAB (Jews around Biden) administration is doing some good, even if inadvertently.
The unfair system of the Petrodollar may be on the wane.
I thought “anonymous” was making a “double jepardy” joke. In fact I almost gave him a “lol” for it, but a glitch combined with tiredness/lethargy stopped me.
All the best,
Kali.
That’s good point because no where in the constitution does it mention party political organization. Yet if you form a new one without extensive funding, elite support etc you are labeled a terrorist in many respects.
The most materialistic culture in history may have been the high medieval to early renaissance. The effort put out to make things of lasting beauty out of everything hasn’t been surpassed. Even the Roman’s and Greeks were not doing as much.
Somebody stop me. I’m having too much fun!
The “mass of Khazar Jews” agree with Solzhenitsyn and you that Stalin & his gov’t killed 60+ million Jews. Both hands agree with you. Be happy.
On the other hand:
The numbers do not add up. I’ll stick with the verifiable truth.
I would point out that the niggers in California can into politics, $4 million each
dugin is a little too subtle eh? you have to try and read between the lines; russia is owned by the chassids, they are more dominant in russia in terms of pure power than even in the good ole’ jew s a – the power vertical and all that – it hasnt escaped non-jew russkies that most oligarchs are….jews;
so then, when dugin talks about globalists and western political modernity or Liberalism he is effectively talking about “da joos” …he is is never gonna be anglin david duke meme-town explicit for your dumb ass…so do try to keep up…
https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/jeffrey-sachs-what-ukraine-needs-learn-afghanistan
Jeffrey Sachs: What Ukraine Needs To Learn From Afghanistan
But Ukraine isn’t ruled by Ukrainians but by globalists like Zelensky who couldn’t care less if all the dumb Ukro-Slavs died.
so then, when dugin talks about globalists and western political modernity or Liberalism he is effectively talking about “da joos” …he is is never gonna be anglin david duke meme-town explicit for your dumb ass…so do try to keep up…
When some of us talk about globalists we mean globalists.
Most billionaire globalists at not Jewish. Jews are overrepresented but most are Anglo.
I don’t think society should even have billionaires. They become consumed by greed and then turn to globalism as some type of redemption. They can and have flipped an election on their own.
Consider Gates who gained his wealth from a monopoly and now focuses his philanthropy on Africa.
He has bought up tons of land in the US for no stated purpose.
What a White hero. Builds a massive pool of wealth through a monopoly and then buys up rural land just because he can. Him and a couple other billionaires have been buying up rural Montana. They do it through hidden companies so it doesn’t attract attention. Are they building rural businesses and talking to locals? No, just buying land like it is a game. Instead of Game of Thrones it is Game of Nerds and our idiot GOP still thinks it is all fine cause capitalism is always good for you (praise be to mother Rand and all blessings to her).
I would happily trade him for a thousand NY Deli Jews if it meant breaking up his wealth. The system favors these globalists that are able to undermine democracy with their wealth. Some of the worst anti-gun legislation has actually been funded by ex-Microsoft billionaire Steven Ballmer. He bought an NBA team and now tosses cash at anti-gun proposals because it is pocket change to him. Fuck you peons, I have private guards and an NBA team. So I don’t want you having guns. That is how he thinks and the system lets him do it. The Nike billionaire does the same thing. They fund anti-gun legislation in states where they don’t even live. Our doofus conservatives look the other way and tell themselves that the wealthy 1% are always good for America. Idiots.
The picture shows two sides in a war conflict (1999):
RIGHT SIDE (upper half) – the countries participating in the bombing
RIGHT SIDE (bottom half) – the countries that have given up their airspace for bombing
LEFT SIDE: Yugoslavia and its allies.
Ben Norton left The Grayzone I believe over his disagreement with Max Blumenthal over the pandemic. Norton was a believer apparently and the others were not. Norton, as the above article points out, typically hates on people and even spreads typical liberal lies about them if he believes they hold conservative social views or politics. I don’t know if that is a knee-jerk liberal reaction typical of ignorant or intellectually dishonest or lazy young people on the left, or if he has some other reason. Both he and Max Blumenthal used to hate on Assad and promoted the typical liberal establishment take on Syria before changing their views. So it may be just that Norton is quick to accept liberal positions if he doesn’t know much about a topic or person and then later changes if he learns more. For example Norton AND Blumenthal both promote the liberal establishment take on Modi and the BJP. Not knowing the real story, out of ignorance and not researching deeper into the topic they don’t appear to know that the left and liberal media in India has and continues to publish a totally false take on Modi and the BJP for political reasons, i.e., they are aligned with the opposition party and with the anti-religious establishment, who are both aligned with the left and liberal establishment, media, celebrities, and politicians in America and Europe. What they did and do Trump vis-a-vis Russiagate and everything else about him because he is not a liberal and doesn’t automatically kow-tow to their corporate leadership–they also do to Modi and the BJP, calling them extremist bigots, far right, fascists, etc., even though Modi and BJP are centrists, not very religious, and even left leaning on various issues. Practically everything they say and write about Modi and the BJP is similar to how the left and liberals say and write about Trump, but even worse since a lot of it based on religious based lies to incite religious based hatreds to Hindus in general.
Upton Sinclair was incorrect. Fascism is simply capitalism, which is mass murder. One need simply consider, say, the tobacco business, the greatest knowing mass murderers in history. Junk food, asbestos, fossil fuels, the chemical industries, armaments, BigPharma-the list is endless.
The best description of current ‘Western Civilization’ is ‘anti-human’.
Apologies:
The sentence should read:
Do you think they love US?
https://music.youtube.com/watch?v=OS2QZvisrkM&feature=share
this article is about dugin, dugin is russian and i was talking about chabad sect influence in russia, so when he dugin is talking about western political ideology, in which he wraps words and concepts such as capitalism, slavery, liberalism and globalism, he is talking about Jews; chassids practically own putin and he keeps them close, dugin cant out right come out and point fingers when theyre that close to the power vertical in russia;
he literally talks about Soros by name, he talks about the filth rot and poison of the rainbow lgb transpedo crowd which have major capitals in jew york jew los angeles jew frisco jew berlin jew london and that shit hole hasbara filth in tel aviv; but also we are talking about organized Jewery, cabbalist sabbateans, talmudists and babylonians, not from Judea and Canaan and not rank and file or reformed jews.
That bastion of ‘freedom’, ‘democracy’ and ‘Western Moral Values’, Ukraine, has ‘removed’ NINETEEN MILLION volumes of Russian literature from its ‘libraries’. ‘Glory to Ukraine!’. ‘Glory to the West!!!’.
every country would be like iceland if every country were as close to a democracy as possible.
small population.
small land area.
AND homogenous in everything that matters…one big (small) family.
the russian empire is the problem.
it’s the ONLY viking empire that survives.
the USSR dissolved because NATIONALISM.
NOT because MUH ECONOMIC FAILURE.
the USSR WAS AN ENORMOUS SUCCESS ECONOMICALLY.
(it solved the collective action problem.)
“homogeneous” is a solecism. but only i know it to be such apparently.
“they” CANNOT live among us. their living among us is WRONG! MORALLY WRONG!
anyway…i’m a bigger drunk than yeltsin and i feel no obligation to the humanity that will come after me…it’s shit.
the russian anthem is the soviet anthem with the words changed.
VS
It would seem Liberalism in 18th Century Europe played the biggest role. While it did release people from the Monarchy, Clergy and backward traditions, it also allowed free market Capitalism to capture the liberal population with zero roots. When you don’t have any roots (i.e. religion or government (Fascist, Socialist)) to keep people grounded with civilized boundaries, degeneracy flourishes because the earning of $$$ becomes the only goal. Seems like free market Capitalism is the root of degeneracy in the West.
In many ways liberalism is the product of industrialization and massive urbanization and sub-urban realityscapes. It as a way of life has departed from direct connexion with the natural world in a devolution into a rat-race reality.
Contemporary society is bedizened and ruled by abstractions…such as clock and calendar, the ever present mania on money…and ultimately by means of a totally abstract alphabet. Abstractions engender obstructions. That matrix is more like a net than a trap. People are caught up in them and never or rarely question their personal disempowerment.
Megalopolitanism is the product and producer of modern Western liberalism. Megolopoli are analogous to cancer. They just keep metastasizing as they gobble up more and more of both productive land and the natural world. There is no end to it until the point of massive cultural collapse.
Liberality is a blessing, both for the ones being blessed and the one who provides the blessing. On the other hand liberalism is a social disease.
Astutely reasoned and well stated. Thanks.
Political liberalism, theologigal liberalism, American leftist self-appointed “liberal“?
Making things of lasting beauty is part of the esthetic realm and is not materialistic in any specific sense. It would appear that many of the designers and actual craftsmen/builders of the cathedrals in that time period may have been more in tune with Creator than with the religiosity of the Vatican.
Humans who create, in nearly any medium, but specifically in congruence with beauty, truth, honor and honesty, become one with Creator…and not that nasty, satanic entity that the ancient Hebrews made into their tribal wargod…Yahweh, or aka as Jehovah. Creator, for a single example which should reverberate around this site, would not conceivably need some “chosen people=master-race. All are One within Creator…even those who believe in false doctrines which submit them to the slavery of mind-control.
this article is about dugin, dugin is russian and i was talking about chabad sect influence in russia, so when he dugin is talking about western political ideology, in which he wraps words and concepts such as capitalism, slavery, liberalism and globalism, he is talking about Jews
Well that is your interpretation. I don’t believe everything he says is Jew whispering.
he literally talks about Soros by name
Yes and he is the most influential globalist in Europe. I’ve mentioned him many times in the context of wealthy globalists that undermine democracies.
Duggy promotes his “fourth way” that rejects race and any type of thinking where one group is naturally more advanced than another. All groups are equal under … ??? he still hasn’t explained. Some type of nationalism it seems but he doesn’t fully explain.
But you think he is going after Jewish globalists? If I described his “fourth way” anti-racism and anti-Westernism as Jewish you would completely agree. He is bizarrely promoting anti-nature racial egalitarianism while claiming to be anti-leftist and anti-globalist. It doesn’t make any sense.
The guy is just confused. He actually tried combining elements of Nazis and Communists. That’s like trying to create a Christian-Islam. Not to mention using very unoriginal sources and depending on the very Jewish influence you seem to think he opposes. Marxism was written up by a German half-Jew who hated the West just as much as Dugin.
Dugin actually experimented with satanism. A bit of a nutcase that only has a spotlight because partisans blew up his daughter by accident. He makes some interesting points but doesn’t have a viable plan.
Are you joking?
Isn’t it socialism you’re describing?
?
Russian agents who entered France under the guise of “refugees” and carried out a series of terrorist activities were discovered and exposed in France. Such “refugees” are derailing trains carrying hazardous materials in the United States. The arrests will begin soon.
If MAX PARRY thinks there are “NAZIS” in Ukraine, he is an imbecile.
Are you joking?
Isn’t it socialism you’re describing?
This the inevitable confusion with the term liberalism that occurs with Euro/US translations.
In Europe liberalism normally describes openness in markets and thinking. Democracy with free markets basically. In the US this is sometimes referred to as classic liberalism but the term has lost its meaning.
Liberalism in the US is an ideology that supports government control for the sake of equality.
It’s basically socialism light with an anti-White underbelly.
The quick and dirty history is that liberals in the US lost their faith in traditional liberalism providing the egalitarian (especially racial) society that they desire. This is because race stubbornly will not go away and free market capitalism naturally highlights this reality. So they accepted government coercion as necessary to promote racial and gender equality. But they really aren’t socialists as they are fine with a mostly private market. In fact US liberals now take more cash from Wall St than conservatives.
Libertarians sometimes refer to themselves as classic liberals but no one cares.
You see the effort to make beautiful things as an example of materialism? To me it seems the opposite is the case. Brutalism and Soviet “art” are two examples that come immediately to mind in which materialism actually flaunted its indifference, even hostility, to beauty.
contemporary American society and increasingly its exported finacialized FIRE (finance, insurance, real estate) version of “capitalism” is increasingly about:
The Bezzle™
Let’s be honest, the American model of Business (big B), at least from the closing of the gold window, is and has always been about Fraud; Fraud until you get caught; IBG YBG.
Let’s not forget that fine Soviet architecture that still crushes the soul.
Architecture that says you are nothing.
Why would you make material ugly if you were a materialist? See what I mean there? Only people in love with ideas and ideology fuck up beauty. America is a exceedingly spiritual and ideological place for example. The Ugly and Plain are a virtue.
Ukrainians, the butt boys of Europe. No. 1 in masochism, servility, and prideless groveling, Sold its soul, its women, and dignity.
Dumber than Poles.
Anglos are Angleashes and Angleeches.
Having lost their empire and glory, they leech off Jewish Hegemony to feel relevant in world affairs. And Jews have them on the leash as cuck dogs.
Piers Morgan is total Angleech and Angleash.
Video Link
Contra baños, All modern economic, social, political terminology has become trite, fuzzy, and ambiguous.
We’re so impressed with your batshit crazy priest who rants about Jewish influence while wearing not one but two crosses.
As with Anglin he won’t show pictures of his hero Putin kissing the wall. Just US politicians.
Oh and I hate to break it to you but he is a racial Jew.
https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Nathanael_Kapner
A self-hating Jew if there ever was one. Oy vey.
Oh and while on the subject of self-hating Jews I’d like to see Dugin get a DNA test.
He is a very small intellectual with a rabbi like beard.
He could easily have some grandparents that converted to Orthodoxy.
In his memoirs, Power in TNT, Mikhail Poltoranin, who was head of the powerful State Committee for Mass Media under Yeltsin before falling from grace, clearly shows Putin as the organizer of the murder of General Lev Rokhlin, one of the most prominent opposition figures, who was shot in his country house and then blamed on his wife, who allegedly had a psychotic accident. Putin later committed many other crimes, but this was his ticket to the political Olympus. After that, there was no way back to the world of decent people.
The political technology to bring Putin to power was developed by Boris Berezovsky. For this purpose, residential buildings in Moscow and Volgodonsk were bombed, resulting in hundreds of victims. These acts of terrorism were blamed on Chechen bandits, who at that time preferred provocations on the borders of the Chechen territory ceded to them by Yeltsin. A number of “punctures” in the organization of these terrorist attacks indicate that the human casualties were foreseen in the bloody staging.
In the previous six months, Putin, who had no experience in running any of the special services, became their head and then moved just as quickly to the post of head of the government.
During Putin’s presidency, he has committed state crimes that are classified as serious under the Criminal Code and are associated with the concept of “treason”.
The 2007 treaty with NATO stipulated that alliance troops could be stationed on Russian territory, and there is a NATO military base in Ulyanovsk. The treaty was not cancelled during the formal termination of relations with the alliance in 2014-2016. In fact, this means the willingness to use the army of a potential adversary against its own people.
In 2008. Putin handed over 337 square kilometers of Russian territory near Khabarovsk to China without any justification. Against the backdrop of Siberia’s vastness, this seems like a trifle. But that does not make it any less of a crime. In addition, a large-scale settlement of the Far East and Siberia by the Chinese and the leasing to Chinese entrepreneurs of vast territories, which in a few decades will easily be alienated from Russia.
In 2010, Putin redistributed 90 thousand square kilometers of sea area to Norway and, in violation of international agreements, gave the Norwegians full sovereignty over the archipelago of Spitsbergen (153 thousand square kilometers), as well as Bear Island (Barents Sea). Territorial concessions are a direct betrayal, a violation of the territorial integrity of the Russian Federation. This is an act, even an attempt, which, according to criminal law, is a serious crime. But this is not the main crime of Putin. The main thing is the actual liquidation of the state and the transformation of the state authorities and the entire legal and political system into a decoration.
There’s a highway which bisects the Minneapolis suburbs of Lakeville and Apple Valley. For over a mile on the A.V. side of the equation, there have been erected by a single New Jersey developer, a series of the most goddamn awful ticky-tacky three or four-story apartment buildings which all look alike, with modest differences in beige and similar colors. They are all built to a particular pattern and the construction workers are obliged to construct their part of the program on a timed basis.
That is a definition of highest finance capitalism in action. Difference between them and the Soviet era monstrosities is that the latter, being constructed of pre-cast concrete, buttressed by steel rebar and perhaps a few I-beams, are likely to linger on for generations, while the American versions are calculated to last through the period of amortization of their real-estate loans…about two decades.
Are there any significant number of honest and honorable, to say nothing of esthetically pleasing multi-unit structures being built in America today? There appears to be neither soul nor spirit present in those rabbit-hutches and sheep sheds. The younger degenerations who opt to dwell in those horrific nonentities must be hollow within.
John Pilger On Liberals’ ‘Willful Ignorance’ On China & Ukraine War
An element of confusion is the assertion that ‘it happened’ that many of the country’s new oligarchs’ were Jewish. It did not just ‘happened’, it was planed all along.
The ‘new oligarchs’ were descendants of the ‘old nomenklaturist oligarchs’ elbowed by the ‘stalinists’ (‘Stalinism=Red Fascism=Velikorussian nationalism’), with relatives in the West’s ‘elites’ (many, if not all, alighting from the shtetls of ‘Ukraine’). They grabbed the levers of power, bent on revenge, claiming the right to plunder Russia unimpeded and transfer the loot to their relatives in the ‘West’. Putin (and his Mafia’) stopped the gravy train and ‘stole’ the loot, that is an unforgivable sin.
You are mistranslating “corporation”. Under Fascism it referred not to privately owned giant businesses but to any institution or body of people including businesses n labor unions. The intent was to unite all people, not help some people exploit others. Americans always seem to mistranslate this. I suppose because Americans simply cannot conceive of a society where no one is exploiting anyone else.
You forgot the main advantage of Iceland – it is remote. But we’ll wait and see if this remoteness is an impediment to immigrants and African criminals.
Absolutely incredible essay. I think he is right. Dugin is indeed not a fascist. Nor were the Nazbols. Nor is Putin, for God’s sake! The fascists are the Ukrainians under Zelensky, the Jewish fascist. Actually that is racist fascism, in other words Nazism or National Socialism. Poland has some fascist tendencies too and the BJP government in India is absolutely fascist. Turkey has been a fascist state for many years, as is Azerbaijan. And Italy does appear to be ruled by fascists now.
What we are dealing with in the West now is some bizarre form of “liberal authoritarianism.” I wanted to say liberal fascism but that’s not correct.
Based Russian spies. They should have killed more kike slaves, that is my only critic.
I am not talking about user of arms, Americans such as yourself are so hypnotised by movies and media you only think in binaries of sitting at home doing nothing or violence.
Americans are so hopeless they can’t set up an email list and organise weekend meetings to tackle their housing problem. I am talking about things like that, meeting real life people and doing real life action like getting elected to local office or forming discussion groups at the very minimum.
They don’t even discuss it online, despite it being the number one gigantic issue no one can deny.
If they can’t organise on housing they can’t organise on anything else.
politically defanged and impotent, crooked compromised politicians put on a show for them under orders of those mostly Jewish elites who own the media and finance.
Geez, ok, beauty is an ideal. There is no material substance called beauty.
America is an exceedingly materialistic place. Money-worship, commercialism, consumerism, and keeping up with the Joneses are all examples of crass materialism.
One of the many reasons Marxism was so disastrous was because Marxists agree with your last sentence. From each according to his ability, to each according to his need was pure materialism, and no one “needs” beauty. It was no fluke Marxism produced the ugliest societies in human history.
it is correct; it is fascist and fascism; Dugin makes this point repeatedly: call Liberalism what it is, namely evil and totalitarian and therefore it is correct to call it as he states:
“Today, our main enemy is represented by liberalism, by the open society, by Soros-funded groups of liberal terrorists — which could be regarded as leftists or far-left fascists. ”
…
“We are dealing with the clear totalitarian face of the liberal ideology. It is a liberal dictatorship, because it demands to cancel history — anything that doesn’t coincide with the more and more narrowing criteria of radical and totally intolerant liberalism.
These are clear signs of totalitarianism…the liberal ideology demands to cancel everything — except Black Lives Matter, Soros’ LGBT+, and some chosen groups of minorities, at the price of prohibiting everybody else.”
combined with statist political power, that is 100% fascist, it just so happens to be called “liberalism”.
Dugin states that Liberalism is just another branch from the tree of Western political ideology which gave the world communism and fascism (along with slavery and usury after both had been stopped in the christian world for hundreds of years), it just so happens that it won, it still exists and it was universal until recently and is now in decline.
Dugin states
“Communism and fascism have a common basis with liberalism: Materialism — Atheism — Progressivism — A purely materialistic approach to the human being.”
and
“The name of the enemy has absolute importance. If we name the enemy as the modern Western political ideologies or Western political modernity, we already are on the right path. ”
but to be clear
“We don’t invite people to fight against the West. Not at all. The West is not an enemy…We don’t invite people to fight against modernity…We can actually live in the modern world outside Western political modernity…
So, we are challenging neither the West nor modernity: we are challenging Western modernity.
And that’s a kind of form based on the anti-Christian, anti-spiritual, anti-traditional, anti-sacred turn in Western history that coincided — not by chance — with colonialism [slavery, usury, banking], the beginning of the Enlightenment [marxism]”
and finally,
“This modern era of the scientific, materialist, colonialist period of Western history is the evil; this is the problem.
Western modernity in general — in the philosophical, scientific, geopolitical and economic senses. It coincides with capitalism, because capitalism, materialism, atheism and colonialism re-introduced slavery after hundreds of years of the non-existence of slavery in Western Christian culture.”
So call it what it is: In the third decade of the 3rd millennium: Liberalism IS Fascism IS totalitarianism.
Yeah, hard to imagine Gramsci being a big fan of tenured radicals and investment bankers.
Are you trying to say that a beautiful building isn’t universally recognised as such? Beauty is a value or a good. It’s not an idea.
Almost the entirety of the tiny population of Iceland are descended from Irish women and Norwegian men. That pairing made for a very independent minded, yet mutually cooperative society, as their ancestry was a combination of fiery Celts and descendants of Vikings who always fought against centralized power.
From what I know about that genetic and cultural heritage, the Icelanders damned well want to keep it that way. Think of it as a reservation for people of higher culture.
DNR and LNR bandits sell the corpses of Russian “liberators” to their relatives in RF.
I didn’t say beauty was an idea. I said it was an ideal.
Also, beauty isn’t dependent on any universal consensus.
As a value, “beauty” is subjective, and that is precisely where Marx’ whole “labor theory of value” breaks down into absurdity and why Marxism is ultimately so dehumanizing and such an effective tool for stripping the wealth out of a victim population.
Ben Norton is on point regarding “multi-polar world” BUT he has an abnormally skinny neck and skinny face which is a sign of Veganism. Malnutrition effects the brain and makes you susceptible to all kinds of nonsense like thinking a fake viral vaccine will protect you from an “imaginary” virus.
Oh please, these Soviet housing was created to house a large number of people cheap and as fast as possible. The USSR did provide cheap housing to huge number of people very fast. However there was mortgage in the USSR, not completely free. But very cheap. Cheap utilities.
It was never about beauty in the first place.
Khrushchyovka – UGLIEST Old Soviet Apartment Building? – Setarko
Soviet Mortgage. How My Family Struggled to Buy an Apartment in the USSR – Ushanka Show
Max Perry is a commie nutter and views everything from bullshit lens emerging from marxist gobbledygook.
Western colonialism (+ Japanese Colonialism) was not that much different from any empires in human history, say like the Ottoman Empire or the Russian Empire. Human history was full of Empires. Western Colonialism was a result of many historical and political processes but one of the most important driver of colonialism was inter-European (joined in later by the USA and Japan) competition for CONTROL of trade routes and later CONTROL of resources from each other. That is why Western + Japanese colonialism became redundant after the US navy’s responsibility of freedom of the seas after WW2, where anybody could trade tih anybody in the World and thus all those loss making colonial empires (economic blocks) was not that important anymore for Western Europe and Japan.
Fascism was nothing but a reaction or protection mechanism from both Marxist Communism as well as cultural deterioration already happening in the West. National Socialism was a reaction and protection of society from marxist Communism, Financial speculative Capitalism as well as cultural deterioration.
Marxists who are more power hungry than other political groups hate Fascism or National Socialism as it is nearly impossible for Marxists to infiltrate a Fascist or National Socialist society and take power. It is much more easy for Marxists to make a power grab in democracies, in other words, democracies are quite useless in stopping dangerous infiltration by power hungry Marxists.
“Two alternatives, and only two, confront existing society at the present stage of development of the productive forces and of social organisation. One is to throttle the development of the productive forces in order to save class-society, to destroy material wealth, to destroy millions of “superfluous” human beings in the slow rot of starvation and the quick furnace of war, to crush down the working-class movement with limitless violence, to arrest the development of science and culture and education and technique, to revert to more primitive forms of limited, isolated societies, and thus to save for a while the rule of the possessing classes at the expense of a return to barbarism and spreading decay.”
The amount of projection and cope commies are capable of is absolutely baffling to me….
Fuck OFF, you evil-minded pizza chit.
Oh please, these Soviet housing was created to house a large number of people cheap and as fast as possible. The USSR did provide cheap housing to huge number of people very fast. However there was mortgage in the USSR, not completely free. But very cheap. Cheap utilities.
You can design low income housing that doesn’t look soul crushing. Even the most minimal construction still has the eye of an architect and the Soviets clearly had an anti-human and anti-beauty theme as part of their construction.
They have littered Eastern Europe with tasteless Brutalist style architecture. Monuments to the failed experiment of Marxism.
Communist building or Borg spaceship?
Dugin, as many members of the ‘intelligentsia’ from everywhere, is an illustration of the warnings of Saint Paul: ”For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears; And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables”.
It’s just modernist housing.
Le Corbusier created that look.
Almost all Humans react to a sunset with pleasure. They also see beautiful faces in almost exactly the same way as each other. Beauty is understood by the nervous system in these two cases.
Thanks to Russian hypersonic missiles “Kinzhal”, which flew at a speed of Mach 12, the communication center near Kiev, which was more NATO than Ukrainian, was destroyed, the Greek portal Pronews reported.
It stated that dozens of NATO officers were killed in the camp on that occasion. He specified that the bodies of 40 soldiers have been recovered so far, but it is not known how many are under the ruins.
Without citing any source, Pronews announced that the attack itself was carried out at the beginning of March, and that the “target” was located at a depth of 120 meters underground.
Allegedly, there were about 300 people in the center at the time of the attack, including military advisers and NATO officers. Among foreigners, the majority were citizens of Great Britain and Poland.
The Greek portal claims that in that center (bunker) there was a command and control center for NATO operations on Ukrainian territory, and that there were also Americans there.
The center itself (bunker) was protected by air defense systems Iris-R and NASAMS, which – as Pronews claims – were also destroyed.
The same portal reports that this destruction of the secret NATO headquarters in Ukraine will also affect the much-announced counter-offensive of the Zelenskyi regime.
At the beginning of March, the American media announced that the Russian army changed tactics during the special operation and started using “Kinzhals” in combination with other missiles.
In regard to the USSR, the fact that nearly all the thieving ‘oligarch’ kleptos were Jews, was first denied and denounced as ‘antisemitism’. Then it was the Jews’ great business acumen responsible, and following on, the ‘antisemitism’ in the USSR had forced Jews to become Mafiosi, spivs, shysters and shonks, all of which suited them admirably for ‘shock therapy’.
‘Liberalism = Socialism’?? Only in your dope dreams.
“Western liberalism, as a mental space, is placed on the platform of denying any higher meaning of life, from which it expresses the conviction that hedonism should be its main dimension. And indeed, hedonism could be considered one of the fundamental principles of modern liberalism”
James Kalb, author of The Tyranny of Liberalism states in his book that
“liberalism developed into a form of totalitarianism and dictatorship in which a comprehensive system of control over individuals and all their relationships accounts only to itself and no one else”
Since at least WW1, Western political elites (Jews and their handmaiden WASPS) have tried to impose this unnatural monstrosity as a universal good on the entire planet, all in the name of “human rights” or R2P or some other detritus claptrap drivel.
In his book Why Liberalism Failed, Patrick J Deneen states that
“liberalism is a wasted ideology that leads only to inequality, cultural decadence, the erosion of all real human freedoms, and the rise of powerful, centralist, undemocratic bureaucracies.”
The contradictions inherent in Liberalism – which itself is related to communism and fascism – such as espousing equality but in actuality producing massive social inequality (neo-liberalism), or espousing individualism while at the same time slowly destroying personal freedoms, or praising some meta histories while fully attempting to deny traditions and historical societal values, will eventually collapse and destroy itself and whatever people and states it rules.
And when Liberalism collapses, Western political elites (lead by Jews) will turn to re-branded fascism and communism updated as:
“Globalism, systematic and planned Americanization and Westernization, the imposition of Western crypto-satanic pop culture, favoritism of the English language, perverse interpretations of political correctness, militant feminism, aggressive LGBT and gender ideology, the promotion of pedophilia and zoophilia”
in order to retain control.
“the goal of liberalism is to replace the collectivism of traditional nations, societies, cultures, and religions with corporate collectivism, in which the individual at the “end of history”, will be reduced to a mere property of the company…such individuals are thus completely denied the right to any kind of true self-realization, and all their life choices are narrowed and reduced to mere production, profitmaking, and consumption.”
“In the ideal case, it is necessary to bypass the parents completely and to reach the young people as early as possible, more and more often already in kindergarten, indoctrinating them, first of all, with the destructive poison of LGBT and gender ideology as a guarantee that, by creating very vulnerable individuals, the manipulation of them in the near future will be complete.”
This is the face of Jew-led and WASP controlled Western political Liberalism.
“In the ideal case, it is necessary to bypass the parents completely and to reach the young people as early as possible, more and more often already in kindergarten, indoctrinating them, first of all, with the destructive poison of LGBT and gender ideology as a guarantee that, by creating very vulnerable individuals, the manipulation of them in the near future will be complete.”
“Western concepts of “cultural exchange” and multiculturalism [Diversity, inclusion], they have only led to the erosion of authentic, traditional cultures and the imposition of [Liberalism].”
It is grand delusions to believe that Western Elites, led by Jews and dominated by WASPS care “about humanism, altruism, and the struggle for human rights.”
outside of Evangelical churches the “greatest success has been achieved among Protestant churches and Lutheran, United, and all 20 Reformist Protestant churches have completely opened up to homosexuals”
Recently, the Anglican church allowed priests to butt-fuck each other and in aussieland they ordained their first tranny freak “priest”.
Source: https://strategic-culture.org/news/2023/03/26/the-collective-west-vs-traditional-values/
Dugin is a fascist, as his hero Putin and minions. Anyone asserting otherwise is either an ignoramus or a liar.
All humans hear the “perfectness” of striking middle C and the C one octave away. One of those strings is twice as long as the other. In other words, the wave frequency is in the ratio of 1:2. The next most perfect sound between two keys on a piano is the perfect fifth, for example, C & G. All humans hear that. Those string lengths are in a ratio of 2:3. The next is a perfect fourth, C & F, and those strings are in a ratio of 3:4.
But the pattern doesn’t hold up. It breaks down into discord. And the remarkable thing is, a song composed only using Cs, wouldn’t be beautiful. It would be composed of the notes that sounded most perfect together, but it would be unbearably ugly. In order for it to be beautiful, we need the discordance, otherwise it isn’t “true” to the world.
Even communist music was ugly. It was false and martial and hamfisted.
You won’t be surprised by the fact that many of the ”NEPmen/Нэпманы”, ”the businesspeople in the early Soviet Union, who took advantage of the opportunities for private trade and small-scale manufacturing provided under the New Economic Policy (NEP, 1921-1928), and gained a ‘better standard of living’ [flaunting it ostentatiously] compared to their poor, working class counterparts, became reviled and ‘stereotyped’ as greedy profiteers with ”an antisemitic tinge”! Guess why.
only the most exceptionally ignorant Fascist would give her unqualified support for Dugin’s proposals…
All interesting suggestions. However having rifles and handguns is a real form of power.
We must remember that Darya Dugina was Evil since she supported both Putin and Emperor Xi, thus it was 100% morally justified for NATO to kill her. It is the will of God, and the will of human morality, that Evil be destroyed, such as the evil of Putin and Emperor Xi. Here is the truth: Putin and Xi cannot be permitted to win. In other words, there is more Honor and Godliness in destroying the entire Earth in a nuclear war than to allow the Evil and Satanic Putin and Xi to win. So, if Ukraine cannot win, then NATO must initiate a nuclear war by carrying out a massive nuclear strike on Russia and China, even if it means a retaliatory strike. You see, if Russia and China wins, then Earth is already lost, thus there is nothing more to lose, and thus NATO has no choice but to die with Honor by destroying the entire Earth. But, not to worry – in the After-Life, the West will go to Heaven, while Russia and China will face the wrath of God.
LOL. NATO never had any honour. NATO is the scum of the earth, real Satanic evil. Even if Xi is an atheist, God loves him more than Devil worshipping, child sacrificing NATO. USA and its allies in sanctions sacrificed at least 500,000 Iraqi children to their Devil.
This seems like a great controversy but I don’t believe the facts are accessible to useless eaters like you and I. Nevertheless I will continue to search for more!
https://www.newsweek.com/russia-nato-ukraine-command-center-strike-kinzhal-missile-1791805
Bohemia/Moravia became a protectorate of Germany in March 1939 once Czechoslovakia split apart. Germany may have played a role in this but the interethnic tensions in the twenty year-old state had been marked, as the Czechs lorded it over the minorities. Germany needed to control Bohemia because some Czech elements were prepared to collaborate with Stalin. Look at a map of Central Europe and you’ll understand why that could not be allowed to happen. Berlin, Dresden, Vienna all within fifty miles of the Czech border.
As for the ‘Spanish Republic’ , a la ‘Black Lives Matter’ a name can cover a multitude of commie murders and basic Jacobinism. But then given your (cough) nom de guerre you probably revel in the idea of killing priests and nuns and destroying fifteen centuries of Spanish Christian civilization.
That’s all we nood to know.
‘Spanish Christian Civilization”…presumably you are bragging about the thousands who were “judicially” murdered by the Cat-Lick church and its Inquisition. Yes, the Spanish “Loyalists” included many murderous types. No argument there. But their pathway was initiated by Rome centuries ago with the many evil aspects of their Constantinian religion.
Dugin is an idiot. There’s no such thing as “Eurasian,” there’s Europe and Asia, and Russia has been historically part of Europe. Just because Russia had wars with other European powers doesn’t mean it’s not part of the same racial stock; that’s be like say France isn’t European.
Eurasianism was introduced into Russia by Bolsheviks. Dugin’s idea that Russians aren’t White, but inherently Asian mongrels, would have been laughed at before 1917, but this lie has gained traction in recent decades because of Putin and his obsessive philo-semitic WW2 propaganda.
Peace in Europe depends on an alliance between Germany and Russia, just like Nietzsche said. Jews know this, and that’s why they have their agents like Putin and Dugin in Russia stirring up hatred against Western Europe, and the inverse in NATO.
That’s all we need to know.
An attempt to do anything like that would be fatal to an American’s career. It would also be futile. Take a look at Robert G. Kaiser’s _So Damn Much Money: The Triumph of Lobbying and the Corrosion of American Government_, 2009.
Politics is a game for professionals in the US, and they guard it jealously. Consider the Charlottesville debacle, Trump, and 1/6 as an example of just how far the pros are willing to go to protect what they consider their livelihood.
Ron Unz has pointed out that WW II was quite different from what the American public (and the civilized world) was told it was. You might consider how much effort it took to maintain the illusion. The probable assassination of Patton was just one part of such an effort. So was the supresion of the Vernona papers. See: https://www.historynet.com/the-venona-project/ and see:
And so was the success of the “anti-anti-communist” movement that, among other things, took out McCarthy, whom the venona papers vindicated.
Did you notice that the Tea Party effort was vitiated by false flag fund raising efforts, or that the IRS persecucted at least theTea Party organizations?
Do you really think that local school boards (and teachers) decided on their own to make Trans studies mandatory? Or that it was a coincidence that the parents who spoke out at school board were designated “domestic terrorists” by the FBI?
This started a long time ago. You can see an early version of supression in Plunkett, _Some Very Plain Talk about Very Practical Politics_, from speaches given some time in the early 1900s. See http://www.gutenberg.com/ and search for Plunkett.
So, no, the lack of political action by Americans isn’t the result of some spontaneous weakness in the US. It is the result of a considerable effort at supression that requires considerable money. That’s why I expect the supression effort to fail when the money flow ends.
Spain instituted the inquisition to dig out marrano (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marrano) infiltrators who were working with the recently Islamic world, recently ejected from Spain. Among other things, the infiltrators were facilitating Islamic slaving raids from the Spanish coast into Spain. Castile and Aragon were beginning to merge into Spain in the 1480s, but Islamic slavers/raiders dominaed the Mediterranian until the Battle of Lepanto, 1571.
Much of what you have read of the Inquisition was contemporary Protestant propaganda against the Catholics. See: https://www.britannica.com/topic/Black-Legend . The Reformation, which eventually became the 30 Year War, was a time of vicious propaganda on all sided. The methodology of the Inquisition, developed against Marranos, was used successfully to break up Protestant networks in southern Europe.
In the long term, of course, the Spanish Inquisition was a long term disaster for Spain. The structure used against the Marranos and Protestant was also used by different political factions against other political factions. That and the military campaigns in Northern Europe that depopulated much of Spain and destroyed Spanish industry led to a collapse of the country both politically and economically after about 1680, a collapse from which Spain has arguably not recovered, and that was instrumental in the vicious Spanish civil war of the 1930s.
Your contempt for people you know little or nothing about, and who died a long time ago, is deeply offensive.
In June, NATO will practice combat operations, called Air Defender 2023, over Germany for 11 days in the airspace of Europe. It was announced in Berlin that it will be the largest fighter exercise in the history of NATO, specifically – that it will involve more than 200 fighters and other military aircraft, as well as up to 10,000 soldiers.
Confirmed participation of the military aviation of Belgium, Bulgaria, Denmark, Germany, Finland, France, Italy, Japan, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Norway, Poland, Romania, Sweden, Slovakia, Spain, Czech Republic, Turkey, Hungary, USA and Great Britain.
The information that it is the biggest action in the history of NATO is wrong. This fighter exercise are much smaller than the bombing of Yugoslavia, when 1000 planes were engaged.
Spanish people are passionate, ardent, vigorous and more than slightly bloodthirsty. Just today I read a 1938 Life Magazine article on the tortures and executions of huge numbers of people who just did not want to take sides…to say nothing of civilians who were butchered on both sides because they did not solidly back those widely variant causes. Once the Communists achieved control they happily butchered anarchists, syndicalists and even democratically oriented liberals. On the Nationalist side the merciless bombings, particularly by the British and Americans, were foreshadowed before the outbreak of the Second World War.
The Catholic Church is a vile institution, but occasionally featured wonderful individuals such as Francis of Assisi, Teresa of Avila and Hildegarde of Bingen. The hierarchy, particularly amongst the ranking administrators in the Vatican, generally have tended to be autocratic, self-seeking despots.
Your accusations in the last paragraph of your screed are totally out to lunch. I happen to be a historian by training and avocationally. So what the hell is your notion of “contempt for people ” (I) know little or nothing about who died a long time ago, is deeply offensive”. If you find it offensive, your problem is a matter of belief in a false concept of religion and an utter lack of spiritual infusion into that dominant matrix of an impositional belief system. You strike me as lacking in any possible objectivity, as by all metrics you appear to be inveigled by the control mechanism housed within the Vatican and its various minions.
Dugin is an idiot. There’s no such thing as “Eurasian,” there’s Europe and Asia, and Russia has been historically part of Europe.
Well from a demographic view there are a lot of Eurasians in Russia.
Russia was a vassal state for the Mongols before it was a European power.
That is why so many Russian Slavs have epicanthal folds. They don’t inherit purely from a European tribe.
Eurasianism was introduced into Russia by Bolsheviks. Dugin’s idea that Russians aren’t White, but inherently Asian mongrels, would have been laughed at before 1917
They were a multi-racial empire before 1917. The idea of them being a White ethnostate was introduced to the imaginations of Putin supporters in 2022.
You don’t know what you’re talking about. Putin supporters are not White Nationalists, they are Russia’s equivalent of patriotard cuckservatives who hate “Nazis” and believe in racial equality. Actual Russian nationalists despise Putin, that’s why demolishing Russian nationalism was his first priority when he came to power 20+ years ago.
Russia was only “multiracial” in the sense that it was an Aryan empire ruling over territories inhabited by churkas. When the Jew-Bolsheviks took over they inverted the racial hierarchy and turned it into an Asiatic tyranny. The Putinists and Duginists are only continuing that tyranny, they’re just using Christcuckery as the bedrock ideology instead of communism.
A good source on the racial history of Russia is Alexey Shiropayev’s “Prison of the Nation.”
Because they were so VERY intelligent, hard-working and principled, and supported one another as a real ‘community’ must? Am I getting warm? Oh, I forgot, they were noble, long-suffering and beautiful, too. My bad.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haplogroup_N-M231
They are who they are. traces of Mongol DNA are not really prevalent at all.
Kiev was definitely resettled by Mongolians so was Crimea in a spectacualr enough way that it became a Khanate, the Vladimir Suzdal area which is Moscow today sent slaves to Sarai in tribute to the Orde Camp, roughly where Stalingrad/Volgograd are now. If anything the Russians around Moscow were colonizing down the Volga in a way that they couldn’t have otherwise if Mongols or Turks were settling in Ryazan and Moscow.
If anything the Volga was becoming more and more Slavic Russian even as the Slaves were carried off by Mongols, who had no interest in settling in Moscow an area that was Frozen half the year. They liked Warmer grass lands and semi arid deserts instead of Tundra and Conferous northern forests.
Peter the Great and Ivan were just pushing down river with peasant stock colonists until they displaced the horsey nomad Turks and remnant Mongols with cannons, farming and higher fertility rates.
You don’t know what you’re talking about. Putin supporters are not White Nationalists, they are Russia’s equivalent of patriotard cuckservatives who hate “Nazis” and believe in racial equality.
I do know what I am talking about. I have had to point out to Putin supporters over a dozen times that Russia is not an ethno-state and is less Christian than Ukraine. They want to believe that Putin is their new Hitler.
They certainly don’t believe in racial equality as seen by their obsession with Jews. Anglin called himself a “Putin fanboy” and can’t reference Russia without mentioning the Jews. Practically every Russian related thread has Putin supporters foaming at the mouth over Zelensky while never mentioning Prigozhen or Vladimir Solovyov (Putin’s proudly Jewish propagandist who told young Russian men to go die while he has a secret male model son in London).
Russia was only “multiracial” in the sense that it was an Aryan empire ruling over territories inhabited by churkas. When the Jew-Bolsheviks took over they inverted the racial hierarchy and turned it into an Asiatic tyranny.
But that still ignores Slavs that are mixed race from Mongol rule. Asiatic influence in Russian blood was noted well before the Russian revolution.
With all that said I’m not sure what point you are making. Yes there was more racial separation before the Communists. Well Putin wants to mix everyone as he opposes the European ethno-state that his followers here idealize. He in fact has far fewer restrictions on travel than the Communists. In the USSR a Siberian couldn’t simply pack up and move to Moscow on his own accord. Do his followers know that he promotes multi-culturalism? No and good luck explaining it to them. They want a Hitler 2 so badly that they will create one in their minds. Sure they will call the Ukrainians “Nazis” and in the next sentence demand that all Jews are rounded up. Does it make any sense? Nope and to a normal person it all sounds bats–t crazy.
Ukrainians are pretty close to Russians genetically, way closer than Ukrainians are to any Americans of Western European descent. If Russians are mutts, so are the Ukroids.
You called them Nords on here, lol.
Russians are Eurasians. That’s what they were called in the book 1984. John Johnson is correct that Russians have a lot of Asiatic blood.
@Wokechoke:
The Wikipedia article you linked shows a gene originating in EastAsia. Among the contemporary Russian groups with highest expression of this gene are Yakuts and Tuvans who look pretty Asiatic. The Tuvans are as close to Mongols as they come – Tuva is a part of Russia right next to Lake Baikaal.
From the Wikipedia article:
“It is generally considered that N-M231 arose in East Asia approximately 19,400 (±4,800) years ago and populated northern Eurasia after the Last Glacial Maximum.” Sounds Asiatic to me.
I have an old Life magazine book from the 50s or 60s lying around showing the Russian regiments that invaded Berlin. A lot of them were Siberian regiments and do not look very European. Unfortunately I can’t send the pic as I don’t have it with me.
There is evidence to suggest Putin is a Jew by blood since his mother was Jewish, which means so is he. Not quarter Jewish like Hitler.
Russia is a diverse country with many tribes, and has been that way for a long time. While I have disagreed with John Johnson about the likely outcome of the Ukraine War (I think Russia will likely win sooner or later, and has a lot of tanks) I think his views on Russian politics as well as the Putin fans is 100% correct.
Link showing likely matrilineal Jewish ancestry (if true Putin is a Jew):
https://www.quora.com/Was-Vladimir-Putins-mother-Jewish
Pureblood NeoHitler savior of the holy white race he is not.
The assertion of Putin being Jewish means nothing. I don’t accept any “evidence” prima facie. What is known is that his mother secretly accompanied him to Orthodox Church services, tutored in the canons of the Church and had him baptized. Against official Soviet doctrine of atheism.
Today, Putin has widely expanded the Orthodox Church’s influence, built thousands of chapels and churches and made the religion de facto for Russia.
Inexperienced, shallow, callow, and eager to impress people seize on a factoid and heavily imply that it has over weaning and extensive influence and power. People like this should fart where nobody can hear them.
Ukrainians are pretty close to Russians genetically, way closer than Ukrainians are to any Americans of Western European descent.
Ukrainian Slavs are pretty close to Russian Slavs. But Russia is made up of more than Slavs and they have far more mixed race individuals. Call them whatever you want.
Regardless you would find more Asian genes in Moscow Slavs than Kiev Slavs.
If Russians are mutts, so are the Ukroids.
I have picked apart the fantasy of Russia being an ethnostate. Don’t assume I keep a similar fantasy of nearby countries. I am fine with discussing genetics as they exist.
Ukrainians have less Mongol and Asian influence than Russian Slavs but they would still have more than Germans or Poles. Calling them mutts doesn’t change the DNA.
You called them Nords on here, lol.
I never called them Nords. Cite the post, you won’t find it.
What I said was that they have more Nordic influence. Nordic genes in Eastern Europe correlate with proximity to Western Europe. That shouldn’t be a surprise given the history of Sweden and Kieven Rus. If you really want I can dig up a DNA study.
Oh, can’t handle the truth, eh? You wait, more is coming your fucking way, like 80 percent of DNR-LNR “defenders” are either homeless bums, convicts, thieves, or gangsters who were killing women and children because they were so dumb they could not aim properly on account of being perpetually drunk or stoned. Ha-ha. You peanut brain did not know about it, did ya?
I am not buying your hypothesis.
Americans have a tendency to deracinate(unroot themselves) and that leaves them vulnerable to media hypnosis. that is a consequence of history of being a immigrant/colonial country
More lies from a fascist regime appeaser. Dugins daughter vwas a propagandist, spewing out on putin controlled tv the same old lies about Ukraine. As for Ukraine s so called nazi batallion, it has become a one pony show. Many European countries (and the United vStates) have Nazis among their citizens. Now, about those killed, tortured, raped, and abducted by the barbarian ruzzians….
Idiocy is commonplace amongst Banderites. You are proof of the pudding.
Evil, murderous, cowardly thug-must be a Banderite.
This doesn’t in any way negate my argument. Jews are a people. Judaism is a religion that is practiced by some Jews. Putin is a Jew by birth. The fact that he actively promotes a religion whose main characters and God are all Jews does not change the fact that he is a Jew.
Hi, this is perfect.
I am convinced that (((Reid Ross))) is Jewish. This dirtbag did an ambush interview with me, and I didn’t appreciate it all. He pretended to be my friend and to be sympathetic to my project (Alternative Left), but at the end he turned on me, called me an antisemite and a racist and implied I was a fascist.
He’s a (((Russian Jew))). He goes by the nickname of (((Sasha))), which is a Russian name and it’s very common with Russian Jews. Some Jews are indeed named (((Ross))). He got very touchy and weird when I discussed this (((Sasha))) name with him as if he didn’t want to admit to be Jewish or Russian. He got real testy right quick.
Your post is correct. He is indeed carrying water for Israel. Did you know that Hamas, Islamic Jihad, Hezbollah, Syria, Iran, the Houthis were all “fascists?” Neither did I. He’s a crazy anarchist and these loons see fascism under every bush and in every closet.
Dubious about the Cultural Left? Fascist. Opposed to pansexual bathhouses for all ages? Fascist. Opposed to chopping off the boobs of teenage girls and the dicks of teenage boys? Fascist. Opposed to the abomination that is Drag Team Story Hour? Fascist. See? Everyone that’s not Antifa is a fascist! Who knew?
(((Reid Ross))) is in very deep with antifa. His lame project is that there is some Red-Green-Brown or Red-Brown alliance, and I am a supposedly a part of it, even though I’m not. I’m on the Left and I generally want nothing to do with most any type of fascism, properly defined. But I’m a fascist anyway, says (((Reid Ross))). Notice he called the Resistance that opposes Israel fascists? See what he’s doing? He’s a Jewish (((gatekeeper))) throwing the Resistance out of the Left by claiming that all anti-Zionists are fascists.
He writes interminable articles that about this Red-Brown BS. Personally, I don’t see much of this Red-Brown alliance except that we agree on certain things. They’re against the Cultural Left, so are we. They support Russia, Iran, and Syria. So do we. So we happen to coincide on various issues.
Since these idiots keep insisting I’m a fascist, I’ve been studying fascist and conservative movements all over the world. I don’t really like any of them, though I have a soft spot for the “Russian conservatism” of Putin. I don’t mind Dugin either. I have no idea if he’s a fascist or not. My view is he’s about as much of an Orthodox Russian Communist (Stalinist) as he is fascist. In other words, he is uncategorizable.