The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 Brenton Sanderson Archive
Aboriginal Worship and the Flight from Whiteness in Australia
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>
Anti-White activism in Australia is becoming increasingly strident

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

Results from the 2021 Australian Census revealed an astonishing 25 per cent jump in the nation’s Aboriginal population over the preceding five years. This confirmed the trend of the 2016 census showing a 19 per cent surge in the Aboriginal population. Over the last decade the self-identifying “Aboriginal” percentage of the population of Australia has increased from 2.5 to 3.2 per cent. This massive increase in Aboriginal self-identification is not the result of a sudden surge in Aboriginal fertility, but is the culmination of the establishment of an intellectual, political and economic climate that encourages White Australians to shed their racial identity. Like other Western societies buffeted by waves of non-White immigration and anti-White intellectual and political activism, Australia is now a nation where White people are actively discriminated against, and where significant social and financial advantages accrue to non-White people.

Commentators in the leftist media lauded the leap in Aboriginal self-identification, claiming the statistics show Australians finally feel safe to identify as Aboriginal. In truth, the growing embrace of Aboriginal identity and flight from Whiteness is symptomatic of the anti-White trajectory of Australian society as a whole. Commentator Andrew Bolt sees the dramatic increase in the number of White Australians calling themselves Black as evidence of Australia’s “toxic anti-white racism.”

It’s now so embarrassing to be white that another 90,000 Australians have decided to call themselves black instead. … Or let’s put it more kindly: it’s now so chic to be black that these 90,000 Australians have called themselves Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander for the first time in the last census. The 2021 Census is dramatic evidence of the new anti-White racism — and of the growing fraud that comes from lavishing privileges on people claiming to be Aboriginal, with few questions asked. … The 2016 Census found at least 40,000 people who claimed to be Aboriginal or Islander but had likewise chosen not to in the previous survey.

Still, who can blame them from seizing any excuse — however remote or imagined — to stop being white? Check woke bookshops that stock white-hostile titles such as White Fragility, or Back to Black. Or consult the Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, which last year published an insanely racist paper calling “whiteness… a malignant, parasitic like condition” that “renders its hosts’ appetites voracious, insatiable.” So it’s no surprise that the biggest rises in people now claiming to be Aboriginal are in our wokest states. In Victoria, the rise was a spectacular 37 per cent in five years. NSW was second with 29 per cent. In contrast, the Northern Territory – with the biggest proportion of Aborigines – the rise was just 5 per cent.

Back in 2009 Bolt wrote two columns pointing out that individuals with tiny amounts of Aboriginal ancestry (or none) were taking advantage of a raft of government scholarships and affirmative action job vacancies by choosing to identify exclusively as Aborigines. Bolt claimed these people were choosing to identify as Black to leverage their career and social advancement.

For pointing out this this rather obvious fact, and that this increasing Aboriginal self-identification had been encouraged by the multitude of financial and professional incentives available to those identifying as Aboriginal, Bolt was hauled into court and found guilty of violating Section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act (the enactment of which was a direct result of Jewish activism). In September 2010 nine of the “Aboriginal” people Bolt identified in his articles commenced legal proceedings against him and his employer the Herald-Sun. The complainants, represented gratis in the Federal Court by the Jewish barristers Ron Merkel and Herman Borenstein, sought an apology, legal costs and a gag on republishing the articles and blogs and “other relief as the court deems fit.” In the trial Merkel argued in reference to Bolt’s articles that “this kind of thinking led to the Nuremberg race laws and that Bolt had adopted a eugenic approach to Aboriginality.”

In his ruling for the complainants in 2011 the presiding judge Mordy Bromberg (also Jewish) declared that: “I am satisfied that fair-skinned Aboriginal people (or some of them) were reasonably likely, in all the circumstances, to have been offended, insulted, humiliated or intimidated by the imputations conveyed by the newspaper articles. … Even if I had been satisfied that Section 18C conduct was capable of being fair comment, I would not have been satisfied that it was said or done by Mr Bolt reasonably and in good faith.” Thus “good faith” as interpreted by a judge is now the criteria for acceptable speech about race in Australia — with this to be determined by the likes of Justice Bromberg who is a prominent member of the Australian Jewish community. This point was not lost on Bolt at the time, who noted that “And which judge becomes relevant, doesn’t it? Or are we not allowed to suggest that, either?”

Today, the increasingly anti-White tenor of Australian society, and proliferating government programs designed to redress Aboriginal social dysfunction (currently costing taxpayers around $33 billion annually, or some $55,000 per “Aborigine”) are fueling a population boom, with those with negligible amounts of Aboriginal ancestry (or none) self-identifying as indigenous to access ever-expanding indigenous welfare programs, scholarships and career opportunities. The practice of White Australians self-identifying as Aboriginal has become so widespread that Sydney’s Metropolitan Local Aboriginal Land Council recently made a complaint to a government anti-corruption body about the number of Sydney University students identifying as Aboriginal by using just statutory declarations rather than producing “a confirmation of identity letter from a Local Aboriginal Land Council or other Indigenous community-controlled organisation, showing they meet the Commonwealth three-part identity test: that they are of Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander descent, identify as such, and their identity is accepted by a community in which they live or previously lived.”

Bruce Pascoe: Poster Child for the Benefits of Fleeing Whiteness

The remarkable professional and financial benefits that can accrue to White Australians willing to discard their racial identity to become Aboriginal is illustrated by the spectacular rise of “historian” Bruce Pascoe. Before his rise to fame, Pascoe was the obscure author of works such as the 1988 novel Fox, about a “fugitive searching for his Aboriginality.” Critics at the time suggested it would have been a better book had Pascoe not been White: “Pascoe is, after all, imagining the psyche of an Aboriginal person. … He writes as a humane, informed liberal, but as a white man as well.” Around this time Pascoe started identifying as Aboriginal, even though two Aboriginal groups call him a fraud and his genealogy shows all his ancestors are of English descent. But now as an Aborigine, Pascoe has enjoyed wild career and financial success: hailed as an “elder,” promoted as an “Aboriginal historian” by the Australian Broadcasting Corporation, given grants for Aboriginal enterprises and made a professor of “Indigenous Agriculture” by the University of Melbourne. “Indigenous Agriculture” is a fake discipline invented by Pascoe using so-called evidence to claim Aborigines were farmers in his widely acclaimed and promoted 2014 book Dark Emu.

Fake Aborigine, bad historian, and all-round grifter Bruce Pascoe
Fake Aborigine, bad historian, and all-round grifter Bruce Pascoe

In Dark Emu Pascoe contends that, rather than being Stone Age nomadic hunter-gatherers as long assumed, Australia’s Aborigines had settled towns and practiced agriculture. Pascoe based his ahistorical thesis on dubious sources and legitimate sources taken out of context. In their critical analysis of Dark Emu, the academics Peter Sutton and Keryn Walshe demolish Dark Emu noting the book is poorly researched, not fully sourced, and, when it is sourced, Pascoe does “not cite the relevant extract from a source in its correct context, thus skewing the interpretation.”[1]Sutton, Peter; Walshe, Keryn (2021). Farmers or Hunter-Gatherers? The Dark Emu Debate. Melbourne: Melbourne University Publishing. They also note Pascoe’s tendency to generalize from local examples to incorrectly claim that particular technologies were used across the whole Australian continent. They and anthropologist Ian Keen conclude that Pascoe’s thesis is a vast exaggeration: that Aborigines were fundamentally Stone Age hunter-gatherers who practiced some rudimentary forms of agriculture on an insignificant scale.[2]Keen, Ian (2021). “Foragers or Farmers: Dark Emu and the Controversy over Aboriginal Agriculture”. Anthropological Forum. 31: 106–128. Sutton and Walshe also chastised Pascoe for his implicit acceptance of the (now verboten) anthropological notion that settled agricultural societies are superior to those of nomadic hunter-gatherers. Even some Aboriginal activists like Hannah McGlade criticized Dark Emu, insisting the book is “misleading and offensive to Aboriginal people and culture” and “is not very truthful or accurate.”[3]Taylor, Paige (23 June 2021). “Darker issues at play over Bruce Pascoe’s Dark Emu”. The Australian.

Lying to schoolchildren

These criticisms have not prevented Pascoe’s work from being showered with awards, aggressively promoted by the leftist media (prompting sales of over 250,000 copies) and cited as a valid historical source in textbooks used in Australian schools. One such textbook, citing Pascoe, falsely claims, for example, that Aborigines “actively managed the land in complex ways and so were not nomadic hunters-gatherers.”[4]Adcock, M., DeFanti, A. Eggleston, T., Osbourne, D. Polatidis, D., Keith Pratt, A., Ritchie, L., Cambridge Humanities for Victoria 9 (Cambridge University Press: Port Melbourne, 2020), 20. Another textbook tells students:

Over 30,000 years ago, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples were baking bread in Australia. They developed this skill alongside their ability to harvest seeds and grains. Historian Bruce Pascoe says this makes them the world’s oldest bakers – they were baking 15,000 years before the next known bakers, the ancient Egyptians. How do we know this? One way is through the research of historians like Pascoe. Pascoe has written a lot about how they developed farm practices around Australia. These practices enabled them to settle in specific regions, and rely less on hunting and foraging. They were able to manage the land to create food for their communities.[5]Adcock, M., DeFanti, A., Casey, J., Driscoll, B., Eggleston, Frigo, N., Middlebrook, Y., Polatidis, D., Keith T., Keith Pratt, A., Cambridge Humanities for Victoria 7 (Cambridge University Press: Port Melbourne, 2020), 7, 6.

Such dishonesty is symptomatic of how Aboriginal history is taught in Australian schools. Students are fed a romanticized view devoid of any criticisms. Because the culture of Australia’s Aborigines was the most primitive in the world – they remained Stone Age hunter-gatherers right up until contact with Europeans – the focus, in recent years, has been to stress the opposite: how “sophisticated” and “complex” Aboriginal societies and culture were (and supposedly remain) today.

A sampling of school history textbooks reveals that, while offering abundant criticisms of Europeans and European culture, authors flatly refuse to offer any criticisms whatever of Aboriginal culture and society. Instead, Aborigines are lavished with unwarranted praise for the supposed complexity and sophistication of their culture. “First Nations Peoples of Australia” (always capitalized) were, it is insisted, “highly skilled in dealing with environmental challenges,” were “advanced cultures with considerable populations,” had “complex political, social and legal structures,” were “well fed, fitter and probably healthier than their European counterparts,” and developed “sophisticated farming and food-production methods.” They were also the world’s first astronomers: “They used the stars to create complex seasonal calendars, which included details on the position of the stars and constellations.”[6]Ibid., 20.
(Adcock, M., DeFanti, A., Casey, J., Driscoll, B., Eggleston, Frigo, N., Middlebrook, Y., Polatidis, D., Keith T., Keith Pratt, A., Cambridge Humanities for Victoria 7 (Cambridge University Press: Port Melbourne, 2020), 7, 6.)
Unfortunately for those students interested in learning about the exact nature of these “complex” structures, such concepts are declared “sacred” and, consequently, “They can only be shared with the initiated, and cannot be described in a textbook.”[7]Lawless, B., Green, D., O’Brien, P., Shephard, N., Van Weringh, I., Fricker, A., Good Humanities 9 (Matilda Education: Fitzroy, Victoria, 2021), 9, 62.

While the early British leaders of the Australian colonies receive scant praise and abundant moral censure, the same textbooks laud the “great Genghis Khan” as “a brilliant, merciless leader who built a vast empire, slaughtering millions in his quest to rule the world.” The Mongol leader’s “determination to succeed combined with a charismatic personality, intelligence, courage and ruthlessness” saw him “lead his ferocious Mongol army on the largest military expansion in history.” The Mongols are commended for having “fostered cultural development in the arts, ensured peace among their peoples, respected different cultures and religions, and improved trade.”

Genghis Khan is granted the epithet of “great” despite the fact his “troops killed many and used the most brutal tortures imaginable,” and the “more resistance they encountered from an opponent, the more horrible the treatment the opponent received from the Mongol army.” In fact, we are told:

Genghis Khan’s cruelty was unprecedented. At the battle of Kalka River in 1223, the Mongol army defeated the Russian forces, wiping out 90 per cent of the soldiers. Mstislav of Kiev and his army retreated and surrendered in return for their safe treatment. Once they surrendered, however, the Mongol army slaughtered the Russian force. They executed Mstislav of Kiev and buried the remaining noble prisoners alive under a victory platform, enjoying a victory feast on top of them as the nobles suffocated beneath them.[8]Lawless, B., O’Leary, D., Van Noorden, P. Good Humanities (Matilda Education: Fitzroy Victoria, 2021), 106.

None of this prevents Genghis Khan and the Mongols (as a non-White group) from receiving vastly more acclaim (and less moral censure) than the European explorers, founders and leaders of the Australian nation. When the British arrived in Australia in the late eighteenth century these benighted fools purportedly “failed to recognise that the First Nations Peoples of Australia were advanced cultures who actively managed the land.” Aborigines are also (laughably) said to have been more socially progressive than the British. One textbook informs students that “British Women in the colonial period were treated as second-class citizens. … Women were expected to obey their husbands and to bear children. In contrast, the women of the First Nations of Australia held equal status and power in their communities from the distant past until today.”[9]Lawless et al., Good Humanities 9, Op cit., 9, 90.

In reality, Aboriginal societies were, prior to and after contact with Europeans, extremely abusive to women and children and generally violent. In 1995, paleopathologist Stephen Webb published his analysis of 4,500 individuals’ bones from mainland Australia going back 50,000 years. These bone collections were at the time being handed over to Aboriginal communities for re-burial, which stopped any follow-up studies.

He found highly disproportionate rates of injuries and fractures to women’s skulls, with the injuries suggesting deliberate attack and often attacks from behind, perhaps from domestic squabbles. In the tropics, for example, female head injury frequency was about 20–33%, versus 6.5–26% for males. The most extreme results were on the south coast, from Swanport and Adelaide, with female cranial trauma rates as high as 40–44%—two to four times the rate of male cranial trauma. In desert and south coast areas, 5–6% of female skulls had three separate head injuries, and 11–12% had two injuries.[10]Tony Thomas, “The long history of Aboriginal violence – Part II,” Quadrant Online, May 7, 2013. https://quadrant.org.au/opinion/bennelong-papers/201...lence/

The high rate of injuries to female heads was very different from the results from studies of other peoples. These findings, according to anthropologist Peter Sutton, confirm that serious armed assaults were common in Australia over thousands of years prior to the arrival of Europeans.[11]Ibid.
(Tony Thomas, “The long history of Aboriginal violence – Part II,” Quadrant Online, May 7, 2013. https://quadrant.org.au/opinion/bennelong-papers/201...lence/)

From 1788, Europeans arriving in Australia were shocked at the extreme physical violence Aboriginal men inflicted on their women. Watkin Tench, a British marine officer who arrived on the First Fleet, noticed a young woman’s head “covered by contusions, and mangled by scars.” She had a spear wound above her left knee caused by a man who dragged her home to rape her. Tench wrote: “They are in all respects treated with savage barbarity; condemned not only to carry the children, but all other burthens. They meet in return for submission only with blows, kicks and every other mark of brutality.”[12]Nowra, Bad Dreaming: Aboriginal Men’s Violence Against Women & Children (Melbourne: Pluto Press, 2007), 10. Tench observed that when an Aboriginal man “is provoked by a woman, he either spears her, or knocks her down on the spot; on this occasion he always strikes on the head, using indiscriminately a hatchet, a club, or any other weapon, which may chance to be in his hand.” British soldier William Collins recounted how “We have seen some of these unfortunate beings with more scars upon their shorn heads, cut in every direction, than could be well distinguished or counted.”[13]Peter Sutton, The Politics of Suffering: Indigenous Australia and the End of the Liberal Consensus (Melbourne: University of Melbourne Press, 2009), 100.

In 1802 an explorer in the Blue Mountains in New South Wales wrote how, for a trivial reason, an Aboriginal “took his club and struck his wife’s head such a blow that she fell to the ground unconscious. After dinner … he got infuriated and again struck his wife on the head with his club, and left her on the ground nearly dying.”[14]Nowra, Bad Dreaming, 13. In 1825, the French explorer Louis-Antoine de Bougainville observed that “that young girls are brutally kidnapped from their families, violently dragged to isolated spots and are ravished after being subjected to a good deal of cruelty.”[15]Joan Kimm, A Fatal Conjunction: Two Laws Two Cultures (Sydney: Federation Press, 2004), 76.

George Robinson observed in the 1830s that Aboriginal men in Tasmania “courted” their women by stabbing them with sharp sticks and cutting them with knives prior to rape.[16]Nowra, Bad Dreaming, 12. A contemporaneous account by an ex-convict named Lingard noted that: “I scarcely ever saw a married woman, but she had got six or seven cuts in her head, given by her husband with a tomahawk, several inches in length and very deep.”[17]Ibid., 12.
(Nowra, Bad Dreaming, 12.)
Explorer Edward John Eyre similarly observed that “women are often sadly ill-treated by their husbands and friends. … They are frequently beaten about the head, with waddies [clubs], in the most dreadful manner, or speared in the limbs for the most trivial offences. … Few women will be found, upon examination, to be free from frightful scars upon their head, or the marks of spear wounds about the body. I have seen a young woman, who, from the number of these marks, appeared to have been riddled with spear wounds.”[18]Stephanie Jarrett, Liberating Aboriginal People from Violence (Victoria: Ballan, 2013), 123.

None of these accounts are included in any of the history textbooks currently used in Australian schools. Also conspicuously absent is one of the best primary sources we have for understanding Aboriginal social and cultural practices around the time of European colonization: the account of William Buckley, who lived for over three decades with an Aboriginal tribe around Port Phillip Bay in present-day Victoria in the early nineteenth century. Buckley witnessed constant raids, ambushes and massacres and noted how, in night raids, the Aboriginal tribes he encountered “destroyed without mercy men, women and children.” Buckley also described the practice of cannibalism between the warring tribes of the area, including the practice of eating flesh from the legs of slain warriors which “was greedily devoured by these savages.” Buckley says in one tribal battle he lost his brother-in-law and the man’s wife, along with their blind son, who was then roasted and eaten. He mentions their practice of mortuary cannibalism for love, relating that “they eat also the flesh of their own children to whom they have been much attached should they die a natural death.”

They have a brutal aversion to children who happen to be deformed at their birth. I saw the brains of one dashed out at a blow, and a boy belonging to the same woman made to eat the mangled remains. The act of cannibalism was accounted for in this way. The woman at particular seasons of the moon, was out of her senses; the moon—as they thought—having affected the child also; and certainly it had a very singular appearance. This caused the husband to deny his being the father, and the reason given for making the boy eat the child was, that some evil would befall him of he had not done so.[19]William Buckley, The Life and Adventures of William Buckley: Thirty-Two Years a Wanderer Amongst the Aborigines of the Then Unexplored Country Round Port Phillip, Now the Province of Victoria (Hobart: Archibald MacDougall, 1852), 66-7.

Such accounts are assiduously hidden from Australian schoolchildren, and Jewish anti-White activists like the late Colin Tatz flared up indignantly when anyone dared to publicly reference Buckley’s detailed eyewitness description of Aboriginal cannibalism. Tatz falsely insisted that “we do not have a single eyewitness account of Aboriginal cannibalism” and when the Australian politician Pauline Hanson referred to the Aboriginal practice of cannibalism, he equated it with “the blood libel against the Jews,” angrily claiming “the Hanson vilification about cannibalism is not of the same magnitude or consequence, but it is very much in the same genre.”[20]Raphael Israeli, The Blood Libel and Its Derivatives: The Scourge of Anti-Semitism (London: Routledge, 2017), 4.

Noting that extreme violence against women and children in Aboriginal communities has a venerable history, and is currently at “catastrophic levels,” Stephanie Jarrett notes that: “It is important to acknowledge [the] link between today’s Aboriginal violence and violent, pre-contact tradition, because until policymakers are honest in their assessment of the causes, Aboriginal people can never be liberated from violence. … Deep cultural change is necessary, away from traditional norms and practices of violence.”[21]Jarrett, Liberating Aboriginal People from Violence, 1. Aboriginal woman Bess Price, in her forward to Jarrett’s book pointed out that “my own body is scarred by domestic violence” and noted that “Aboriginal people have to acknowledge the truth. We can’t blame all of our problems on the white man.”[22]Ibid., 291.
(Jarrett, Liberating Aboriginal People from Violence, 1.)

The “Genocide” Charge

Unlike Price, the authors of all the textbooks currently used in Australian schools are content to blame all Aboriginal problems on Europeans whom they charge with “genocide.” Students are informed in one text book that while previous generations of historians (i.e., the rational ones who weren’t slaves to today’s regnant anti-White ideology) used words like “settled, settlement and settler” to describe the arrival of Europeans in Australia, modern (woke) historians much prefer “words such as colonist and invader.” These modern historians, we are informed, also “use the word genocide to describe the experience of First Nations Peoples of Australia.”[23]Lawless et al., Good Humanities 9, op cit., 61.

Today’s anti-White historians (and the activist authors of school textbooks) straddle a muddy line between contradictory narratives: on the one hand we are told that British settlers sneakily (and immorally) “stole” the land of the indigenous peoples, while, at the same time, the British arrival in Australia is characterized as an “invasion.” Yet if we accept the “invasion” thesis, then it follows that Australian territory was conquered in a war (and not stolen) by the British — just as warring Aboriginal tribes conquered each other’s territory.

Brainwashed self-hating Whites enthusiastically pushing Jewish activist narratives
Brainwashed self-hating Whites enthusiastically pushing Jewish activist narratives

There has even been a proposal by the current Labor government to include an exhibit for Aboriginal victims of the “Frontier Wars” at the Australian War Memorial in Canberra. By thereby formalizing the notion of a war between Aborigines and Europeans, Aboriginal activists are inadvertently undermining the long-cherished notion of “stolen land” and its propagandistic utility. The Australian War Memorial Act 1980, under which the memorial operates, is clear that the memorial is dedicated only to those who “died in active service in war or in warlike operations by members of the defence force,” which “includes any naval or military force of the crown.” It is certainly not to remember victims of crimes, reprisals and acts of self-defense by Whites, who were primarily pastoralists. Andrew Bolt makes the point that if the memorial is “so keen to honour Aborigines who died fighting for their tribes, then why include only those who died fighting whites? Why not include the many more who died in wars with other Aboriginal tribes?” He notes how:

Tribal warfare was relentless. William Buckley recalled a corroboree with another tribe ended in a fight that killed 20 people. Shortly afterwards, two boys of his tribe were killed. Then three women and an unspecified number of “boys” died in a war with five other tribes. Much later Buckley’s tribe lost at least two women and a man in another battle, but that night ambushed the enemy camp and killed three of theirs. The other tribe then fled, leaving its wounded “to be beaten to death by boomerangs”, with the bodies then “mutilated in a shocking manner” and cooked. And on it went. Multiply the experience of this one tribe by the 500 others. As historian Geoffrey Blainey has noted, the death rates in tribal wars were in some areas clearly worse than what Europeans suffered in their world wars.

All currently-used history textbooks in Australian schools charge Europeans with “genocide” against the Aborigines. As I have previously discussed, the origins of this “genocide” charge can be traced to a coterie of Jewish academics and intellectuals including, most prominently, Latrobe University historian Tony Barta and the late Sydney University genocide studies professor and “anti-racism” crusader Colin Tatz. In collaboration with Winton Higgins, Anna Haebich, and A. Dirk Moses, these Jewish intellectual activists succeeded in ensuring that “genocide is now in the vocabulary of Australian politics.” The word “genocide” was first used regarding Australia’s Aborigines by Barta at an academic conference in 1984 in a presentation entitled “After the Holocaust: Consciousness of Genocide in Australia” where he proclaimed that “genocide had indeed occurred here.”[24]Colin Tatz, Human Rights and Human Wrongs: A Life Confronting Racism (Clayton, Victoria; Monash University Publishing, 2015), 251. For Barta, a laudable focus on “the Holocaust” had “inhibited consciousness of the violent past that had enabled us to meet on ground named after the colonial secretary, Lord Sydney. The question was equally suppressed where I had settled with my family, the city named after Lord Melbourne.”[25]Tony Barta, “Realities, Surrealities and the Membrane of Innocence,” In: Genocide Perspectives: A Global Crime, Australian Voices, Ed. Nikki Marczak & Kirril Shields (Sydney: UTS ePress, 2017), 161.

The policies of the British administrators of the Australian colonies of the late-eighteenth and nineteenth centuries and those of Australian state and federal governments in the twentieth century, cannot, by any objective standard, be regarded as “genocidal” as the term was defined by Raphael Lemkin, the Polish-Jewish jurist who coined it in 1944. The problem for anti-White activists has been that Lemkin’s definition, subsequently adopted by the UN, relies heavily on “intent to destroy,” which has proved problematic in an Australian context where, “without being able to prove intent on behalf of the colonial administration, the case for genocide is weak.”[26]A. Francis Johnson, Australian Fiction as Archival Salvage: Making and Unmaking the Postcolonial Novel (Boston: Brill Rodopi, 2016), 198. Barta, therefore, simply redefined “genocide” to make it encompass the totality of European colonial societies like Australia. His redefinition was “a way of obviating the centrality of state policy and premeditation” embedded in Lemkin’s ‘hegemonic intentionalist’ definition of genocide.”[27]A. Dirk Moses, “Genocide and Settler Society in Australian History” In: Genocide and Settler Society: Frontier Violence and Stolen Indigenous Children in Australian History, Ed. A. Dirk Moses (Sydney: Berghahn Books, 2004), 26.

Barta’s redefinition of genocide enabled him to conclude that “Australia — not alone among the nations of the colonized world — is a nation founded on genocide.” He advocates this message “be the credo taught to every generation of schoolchildren—the key recognition of Australia as a nation founded on genocide.”[28]Ibid., 238; 174.
(A. Dirk Moses, “Genocide and Settler Society in Australian History” In: Genocide and Settler Society: Frontier Violence and Stolen Indigenous Children in Australian History, Ed. A. Dirk Moses (Sydney: Berghahn Books, 2004), 26.)
And, as mentioned, the intellectual activism of Barta and others has succeeded in embedding this ahistorical notion in school curricula and textbooks where White Australian children are encouraged to loathe their race, their ancestors and to disregard their incredible achievements. The Sydney Jewish Museum is proudly playing its part in training Australian teachers “not only about the Holocaust” but also about “the Australian genocide.”[29]George Newhouse, “Standing up for the Aboriginal community,” The Australian Jewish News, October 26, 2017. https://www.jewishnews.net.au/standing-up-for-the-ab.../70424

Recalling how he was inspired by Barta’s genocide thesis, the late Jewish academic and activist Colin Tatz claimed it “set my wheels going about seeing not parallels or analogies but echoes of the Holocaust here — at the very least making me realize that genocide doesn’t have to be a sharp annihilatory episode confined to 1939 to 1945.”[30]Tatz, Human Rights and Human Wrongs, 251-52. For Tatz, Barta’s presentation was an “inspirational moment and one that became central to my life thereafter.”[31]Colin Tatz, Australia’s Unthinkable Genocide (Xlibris; 2017), 499. Embracing and weaponizing the utterly bogus notion of the “Stolen Generations,” Tatz claimed that as a result of “the public’s first knowledge of the wholesale removal of Aboriginal children, the dreaded ‘g’ word is firmly with us,” affirming that the “purpose of my university and public courses” is “to keep it here.”[32]Colin Tatz, With Intent to Destroy: Reflecting on Genocide (London; Verso, 2003), xvi. According to Tatz, White people who rejected his “genocide” label exhibited psychological disturbances manifested in “paroxysms, ranging from upset to extreme angst to even more extreme anger, when the (literal) spectres of genocide appear as facets of their proudly democratic histories.”[33]Tatz, With Intent to Destroy, xiii; xvi.

Inevitably, Barta and Tatz likened rejection of, or even ambivalence toward, their assertion that “Australia is a nation built on genocide” to “Holocaust denial.” Here they were joined by fellow Jewish academic and leading proponent of the “Stolen Generations” myth, Professor Robert Manne. Former editor in chief of The Australian, Chris Mitchell, noted Manne’s penchant for “manipulation of the idea of the Holocaust for political advantage, particularly in the Stolen Generations debate,” observing “this Holocaust tactic, like the related use of the word ‘denier,’ is a simple trick to undermine an opponent’s moral position when a polemicist has little intellectual case.”[34]Chris Mitchell, “A critic untroubled by facts who seeks to silence dissent,” The Australian, September 17, 2011. In levelling the “genocide” charge against White Australians, these Jewish activists seek to exert the kind of psychological leverage used so effectively against Germans, who, as Tatz noted, are “weighed down by the Schuldfrage (guilt question)” to such an extent that “guilt, remorse, shame permeate today’s Germany.”[35]Colin Tatz, Australia’s Unthinkable Genocide (Xlibris; 2017), 3009.

In addition to this genocide charge, other important parts of the psychological leverage exerted against White Australians are the (now ubiquitous) ceremonial practices known as “Welcome to Country” and “Acknowledgement of Country.” Replacing Christian prayer, these solemn genuflections to the sanctity of Aboriginal people and their culture now feature at the commencement of all public events. Welcome to Country was invented out of whole cloth by the Aboriginal actors Richard Walley and Ernie Dingo in 1976. Despite the lack of any real evidence, some Aboriginal activists allege (relying on Aboriginal oral tradition) that the practice can be traced back thousands of years. We are supposed to take such claims seriously despite the fact that such hearsay evidence is considered unreliable and is therefore inadmissible as evidence in all Australian courts.

Regardless of origin, “Welcome to Country” and “Acknowledgement of Country” have exploded in observance and become a potent symbols of the new secular religion of Aboriginal worship and enforced White penitence. Some jurisdictions, such as New South Wales, have made Welcome to Country (or, failing that, Acknowledgement of Country) mandatory at all government-run events. It was first introduced into the Federal Parliament in 2008 and now forms a regular element of Australian political process. The Acknowledgement of Country is touted by activists as a way “any person can show awareness and respect for Aboriginal culture and heritage and the ongoing relationship the traditional custodians have with the land. … It is a demonstration of respect dedicated to the traditional custodians of the land (or sea) where the event, meeting, school function or conference takes place.” In reality, the practice is about political correctness, virtue-signaling and fostering a culture of White abasement.

The new civic religion of Aboriginal worship has infiltrated corporate Australia via compulsory diversity training — pushed under the threat of people’s livelihoods. It is manifested in scrupulous and ubiquitous observance of Welcome to Country and Acknowledgment of Country (all QANTAS passengers are now subjected to it when landing at any Australian airport), and in the fetish for featuring Blacks of all kinds in advertising (in a nation with a still negligible Black population). It is also expressed in the prominent use of Aboriginal art in corporate headquarters and websites.

It is hardly surprising that, in response to such practices, the diffusion of bogus anti-White historical narratives in Australian schools, and the raft of financial and professional incentives available to Aboriginal people today, we are seeing a sharp increase in the number of White Australians identifying as Black. The spectacular professional rise of individuals like Bruce Pascoe only demonstrates the rich rewards that can flow from shedding one’s White identity in contemporary Australia.

Brenton Sanderson is the author of Battle Lines: Essays on Western Culture, Jewish Influence and Anti-Semitism, banned by Amazon, but available here.

Notes

[1] Sutton, Peter; Walshe, Keryn (2021). Farmers or Hunter-Gatherers? The Dark Emu Debate. Melbourne: Melbourne University Publishing.

[2] Keen, Ian (2021). “Foragers or Farmers: Dark Emu and the Controversy over Aboriginal Agriculture”. Anthropological Forum. 31: 106–128.

[3] Taylor, Paige (23 June 2021). “Darker issues at play over Bruce Pascoe’s Dark Emu”. The Australian.

[4] Adcock, M., DeFanti, A. Eggleston, T., Osbourne, D. Polatidis, D., Keith Pratt, A., Ritchie, L., Cambridge Humanities for Victoria 9 (Cambridge University Press: Port Melbourne, 2020), 20.

[5] Adcock, M., DeFanti, A., Casey, J., Driscoll, B., Eggleston, Frigo, N., Middlebrook, Y., Polatidis, D., Keith T., Keith Pratt, A., Cambridge Humanities for Victoria 7 (Cambridge University Press: Port Melbourne, 2020), 7, 6.

[6] Ibid., 20.

[7] Lawless, B., Green, D., O’Brien, P., Shephard, N., Van Weringh, I., Fricker, A., Good Humanities 9 (Matilda Education: Fitzroy, Victoria, 2021), 9, 62.

[8] Lawless, B., O’Leary, D., Van Noorden, P. Good Humanities (Matilda Education: Fitzroy Victoria, 2021), 106.

[9] Lawless et al., Good Humanities 9, Op cit., 9, 90.

[10] Tony Thomas, “The long history of Aboriginal violence – Part II,” Quadrant Online, May 7, 2013. https://quadrant.org.au/opinion/bennelong-papers/2013/05/the-long-bloody-history-of-aboriginal-violence/

[11] Ibid.

[12] Nowra, Bad Dreaming: Aboriginal Men’s Violence Against Women & Children (Melbourne: Pluto Press, 2007), 10.

[13] Peter Sutton, The Politics of Suffering: Indigenous Australia and the End of the Liberal Consensus (Melbourne: University of Melbourne Press, 2009), 100.

[14] Nowra, Bad Dreaming, 13.

[15] Joan Kimm, A Fatal Conjunction: Two Laws Two Cultures (Sydney: Federation Press, 2004), 76.

[16] Nowra, Bad Dreaming, 12.

[17] Ibid., 12.

[18] Stephanie Jarrett, Liberating Aboriginal People from Violence (Victoria: Ballan, 2013), 123.

[19] William Buckley, The Life and Adventures of William Buckley: Thirty-Two Years a Wanderer Amongst the Aborigines of the Then Unexplored Country Round Port Phillip, Now the Province of Victoria (Hobart: Archibald MacDougall, 1852), 66-7.

[20] Raphael Israeli, The Blood Libel and Its Derivatives: The Scourge of Anti-Semitism (London: Routledge, 2017), 4.

[21] Jarrett, Liberating Aboriginal People from Violence, 1.

[22] Ibid., 291.

[23] Lawless et al., Good Humanities 9, op cit., 61.

[24] Colin Tatz, Human Rights and Human Wrongs: A Life Confronting Racism (Clayton, Victoria; Monash University Publishing, 2015), 251.

[25] Tony Barta, “Realities, Surrealities and the Membrane of Innocence,” In: Genocide Perspectives: A Global Crime, Australian Voices, Ed. Nikki Marczak & Kirril Shields (Sydney: UTS ePress, 2017), 161.

[26] A. Francis Johnson, Australian Fiction as Archival Salvage: Making and Unmaking the Postcolonial Novel (Boston: Brill Rodopi, 2016), 198.

[27] A. Dirk Moses, “Genocide and Settler Society in Australian History” In: Genocide and Settler Society: Frontier Violence and Stolen Indigenous Children in Australian History, Ed. A. Dirk Moses (Sydney: Berghahn Books, 2004), 26.

[28] Ibid., 238; 174.

[29] George Newhouse, “Standing up for the Aboriginal community,” The Australian Jewish News, October 26, 2017. https://www.jewishnews.net.au/standing-up-for-the-aboriginal-community/70424

[30] Tatz, Human Rights and Human Wrongs, 251-52.

[31] Colin Tatz, Australia’s Unthinkable Genocide (Xlibris; 2017), 499.

[32] Colin Tatz, With Intent to Destroy: Reflecting on Genocide (London; Verso, 2003), xvi.

[33] Tatz, With Intent to Destroy, xiii; xvi.

[34] Chris Mitchell, “A critic untroubled by facts who seeks to silence dissent,” The Australian, September 17, 2011.

[35] Colin Tatz, Australia’s Unthinkable Genocide (Xlibris; 2017), 3009.

(Republished from The Occidental Observer by permission of author or representative)
 
Hide 247 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. Anonymous[104] • Disclaimer says:

    White’s don’t have the guts or the brains to fight back against their extermination.

    Take YouTube, as a commercial entity on its own it has never made a profit – this info comes from James Corbett. Likewise, with Twitter. Both are just very expensive propaganda tools that are used to keep the sheeple in line.

    [MORE]

    And considering the high number of brainless White cretins that pass for customers on both platforms, both YouTube and Twitter are highly successful at dulling the minds of the White masses.

    Recently the White alt-conservative US media and its readers clapped like seals and whooped cries of delight when Elon Musk “bought” Twitter.

    And they whooped even louder when Musk “fired” Twitters’ Indian CEO. But they ignored the fact that this CEO walked away with a $35million payoff – which was ultimately paid to him by the White US taxpayers.

    It’s this undeservedly set-for-life CEO that has the right to laugh at the US alt-conservative media and its readers, not the other way around.

    Recently Elon Musk advised that if people want to keep themselves from becoming slaves to Artificial Intelligence they’ll need to get chips in their brains. Musk’s reasoning for this so-called advice is that for humans to keep ahead of AI they’ll need to remain smarter and more intelligent than it. And, according to Musk, the only way for humans to outpace AI in intelligence is for them to have brain-enhancing chips inserted in their brains.

    Mr. Musk recently gave a talk where he rolled out a robot. I kid you not, this robot was exactly similar to the types of robots that were around in the 1970s. It could walk forward, move its head and arms and that was about it. This is whilst other robot manufacturers are showcasing creations that can do back-flips and other impossible gymnastic feats.

    But nonetheless, the audience clapped and cheered like lobotomised seals just because Musk has the required cool status in US society.

    Musk has three companies, two of which have never made any profits. These two companies, though, can borrow money from the US government at almost zero percentage rates. Go figure.

    It’s rumoured that Musk, with powerful money behind him, illegally muscled his way to ownership of the Tesla car company. This company is rumoured to have been created by people other than Musk and they were bullied out of it. Then Musk was placed there as an obedient frontman.

    The (((Usurers’))) can do this in the US because they own many judges. So, it’s a shoot-yourself-in-the-foot waste of time taking (((their))) puppets to court when they use Mafia tactics to steal your businesses and creations.

    Musk’s company, SpaceX, also sponsors transvestites to put on shows for American children in libraries and other venues where these perverts have been recorded lifting their dresses and showing the children their groin areas.

    Yet, the US alt-conservative media and most of its readers ran out clapping like demented seals when this blatantly Globalist frontman bought the Twitter propaganda tool.

    It would probably be a waste of time telling them that the only reason that frontman Musk bought Twitter is so the Globalists can use it to forward their transhumanist plans. Twitter has done its job as a propaganda tool, now they want to use it to gather data on people to bring forward their transhumanist agenda.

    Twitter is no good, though, as a gatherer of people’s data if half of the American population are not using the platform. All the people that went to Parler, Truth Social, et al, need to be brought back to Musk’s Twitter so their data can be harvested with the most up-to-date harvesting tools.

    And back the fools will go whilst gloating that they’ve won a major battle for free speech. When you see how utterly easy it is to fool them, how long will it be until they believe that getting electronic chips in their heads is also a win for free speech?

    On top of this, the governor of Florida is the US conservatives’ latest heroic gunslinger that is soon going to draw his six-shooter on the Globalist dragon and shoot it between its eyes.

    But just in the recent past Ron DeSantis passed a law that forbids Floridians from exercising free speech. This law actually makes it illegal for Floridians to criticise Israel or question Jew’s motives. And then, as if to put the tin hat on DeSantis’ Globalist aspirations, he gave a pharmaceutical research outfit permission to release millions of genetically modified mosquitoes in Florida.

    He gave this permission even after Bill Gates had publicly boasted that his affiliates in biological research had succeeded in genetically modifying mosquitoes to be able to spread “vaccines” to people via their bites. These mosquitoes have been called flying syringes in America.

    If these Frankenstein mosquitos are capable of injecting people with “vaccines” by biting them, they’ll also be able to inject people with bioweapons and other toxins and pathogens.

    DeSantis allowed this and yet claims he’s against the SARS‑CoV‑2 gene modifiers. Perhaps he thinks the mosquitos will be ethical and won’t bite people?

    The Woke Left across the Western world are too far gone along the paved road to Hell to be talked out of their destruction. White Conservatives are the last hope for human civilization. How galling it is to see how easily US White Conservatives can be duped into chasing after a swinging carrot that has Hell and destruction stamped all over it.

    Please wake up you effing White fools.

    • Agree: Backward
  2. raga10 says:

    Shift of 19% seems large, but in terms of the whole population it represents increase from 2.5 to 3.2 – mere blip on the radar (to be fair, the article does say that as well).

    I am far more alarmed by some other statistics coming out of this census, such as 5.5% now being of Chinese ancestry (more than all Aboriginals, actual and fake), or Mandarin and Arabic being the most popular languages other than English spoken at home – and that’s just Mandarin; there is also Cantonese listed separately as no. 4.

    India and China are top overseas places of birth other than England.

    Compared to those real issues this trend of whites trying to pass themselves as Aboriginals is both insignificant and largely harmless – Aboriginals were never a real force anyway; the fact that there are something like 160 native languages might hint at why that’s the case…

    • Agree: anonymouseperson
    • Replies: @JM
    , @Mischa
    , @Obsequious
  3. My DNA says:

    It has been PROVEN that Australian Abos are Caucasians, with coded adaptations over the last 40,000 years from living in Australia, such as darker skin, larger nostrils, and resistance to several types of more serious cancers.
    Look it up.
    They are Caucasians, just as King Tut’s DNA has been proven to be European!

    • LOL: Realist
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    , @Joe Paluka
  4. raga10 says:

    It has been PROVEN that Australian Abos are Caucasians, with coded adaptations over the last 40,000 years from living in Australia,

    Does anything that went on 40,000 years ago matter today? I doubt it. By the way, Aborigines also carry up to 5% of Denisovan DNA they acquired somewhere along the way on their migration… I don’t think that matters much, either.

    • Replies: @Ed Case
  5. lloyd says: • Website

    The same proportional jump with Maoris from about thirteen percent to seventeen percent in the most recent census in New Zealand. In the 1980s, New Zealand media was full of this anti white stuff. Then it faded out. People generally shrugged their shoulders and treated it as “a Maori thing”. Then it has resurfaced apparently world wide since Trump’s election victory in 2016. In 1984, I tried to warn Kiwis their citizenship rights were being taken away. That was greeted with levity. It is always pleasant to be able to say, I told you so. Covid is the same. Kiwis are kind but very sheeple.

    • Agree: anonymouseperson, Pastit
    • Replies: @lavoisier
  6. Aboriginal politics is useful to whites as white countries now face immigration-invasion.

    Whites should promote Aborigines and American Indians and argue, “Look, these people lost their precious lands because of immigration-invasion by white people. THEREFORE, we whites shall devote our energies toward protecting these native folks from further immigration-invasion.”

    Using such moral logic, immigration can be ended.

    Flight from white is useful to whites if it’s about whites identifying with Aborigines or American Indians. No matter how much whites favor Aborigines, them dummies won’t amount to much. And American Indians will always be low achievers. Whites should just use them as moral symbols to argue against further immigration-invasion. If whites face the danger of becoming minorities, the threat isn’t from Australian Aborigines or American Indians. It’s from Africa, Asia, and Latin America.

    So, I say long live the Aborigines and the Kangaroos. No more immigration! Save the funny-faced Aborigines and wombats.

  7. Zane says:

    Bruce Pascoe is as much an aboriginal as I am a Zulu.

    • Agree: JM
    • Replies: @Curmudgeon
  8. Looks like Jews are up to their dirty tricks again. Much the same shit here in Canada with the Indians.

    • Replies: @JM
  9. Pastit says:

    Sad state of affairs in OZ. The anti-white cancer has spread throughout the world.

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
    , @Realist
  10. According to Tatz, White people who rejected his “genocide” label exhibited psychological disturbances manifested in “paroxysms, ranging from upset to extreme angst to even more extreme anger[snip]”

    What are the odds that there would be the odd paroxysm if anyone engaged Tatz in a conversation about the German Reich’s attempt to solve its Jewish problem in the 1940s. Perhaps even a bit of angst.

    The fucking stones on these cunts.

    They must realise how tin-eared it sounds.

    That makes it more likely that it’s a deliberate part of a humiliation ritual – the audience is obliged to sit and nod, knowing that anyone who says “Whatabout…” has their details handed to the Pedo-Finder General[1].

    It’s like when a Haredi rabbi talks about sexual morality… when everyone should know that they are the biggest offenders – so much so that there was a story entitled “The Child-Rape Assembly Line. And there’s vast amounts of international evidence that it’s not just restricted to the Jewish ghettos in New York (e.g., Malka Leifer, who fled to Occupied Palestine and is being protected by the government from being extradited back to Melbourne).

    [1] That’s a reference to the brilliant cartoon series “Monkey Dust“.

    Don’t get me wrong – I am totally in favour of hunting out paedophiles. I’ve donated countless hours of time – and vast amount of compute resources – to decryption of ‘liberated’ databases from pedo networks; I helpd draft the “You have 1 year to off yourself, or you will be named” email that was sent to a bunch of the worst high-profile offenders.

    And I’ve done it since before I became aware that my younger brother was a victim of a Victorian schooolteacher – Vin Reynolds – who sexually abused at least 90 children over a 25-year career… a career during which Reynolds was moved from school to school as complaints surfaced.

    Of which, more after the MORE.

    [MORE]

    Reynolds was a teacher in government primary schools. He finished his career as a Vice Principal in a school not 40km from my brother’s school.

    My brother’s school – Bandiana Primary – was mostly for kids whose fathers were posted to one of the local Army bases. We all lived in the married quarters in ‘G Block’ (that was its formal name kek), and that’s also where the school was – ‘G Block’ has been demolished but the school is still there and still operational.

    There were also non-military kids – from nearby townships like Killara. A bunch of non-military local kids were also victimised – I used to play footy with some of these kids; I went to the gym with some of the oldest, who (it turns out) had been victimised almost a decade earlier.

    The older kids – high school age – went to school in Wodonga. We all went to either Wodonga High, or Wodonga Tech. Our school bus used to stop at Bandiana Primary; that’s where we got on and off the bus.

    Reynolds would supervise the primary-school kids waiting for the bus a couple of afternoons a week.

    One of the other kids who lived in ‘G’ block used to go a bit nuts if Reynolds was visible when we got off the bus: “Reynolds you poof! REYNOLDS IS A POOFTER! YOU KIDS WATCH OUT!

    Reynods was a tall, slim bloke who (if I’m honest) did look like a faggot:
      • wore short-sleeved pastel shirts with the sleeves rolled up;
      • had a ‘porn-star’ moustache, and
      • was a bit of a ginger…
         all warning signs (kek).

    I just thought this kid was just being mildly homophobic (the only homophobic slur we knew was “poof” or “poofter”: we were 13 or 14 and it was 1978/79).

    Turns out that he was also a victim (he was a former student at Bandi Primary).

    The fact that Reynolds was never charged – or even investigated – is strong evidence that Reynolds was being protected by the Victorian Department of Education.

    That in turn is ‘tendency’ evidence that there was {is} a clique of homosexual paedophiles in senior decision-making positions in that department.

    • Thanks: Wizard of Oz
    • Replies: @Rich
  11. @Priss Factor

    You’d be assuming any level of intellectual honesty or consistency there.

    Once you realise that it’s all just a canard for anti-white and most people are good retarded goys who do and think what they’re told it makes a lot more sense.

    They know they’re lying, they don’t give a fuck

  12. Malla says:

    We can’t blame all of our problems on the white man.

    That is a mental disease all non-Whites have. And even some Whites have this disease w.r.t other Whites.

    Buckley witnessed constant raids, ambushes and massacres and noted how, in night raids, the Aboriginal tribes he encountered “destroyed without mercy men, women and children.” Buckley also described the practice of cannibalism between the warring tribes of the area, including the practice of eating flesh from the legs of slain warriors which “was greedily devoured by these savages.

    Why is that surprising? With a few exceptions, stone age societies were extremely brutal and ruthless. Genocides of entire tribes is common occurrence in stone age societies.

    The complainants, represented gratis in the Federal Court by the Jewish barristers Ron Merkel and Herman Borenstein, sought an apology, legal costs and a gag on republishing the articles and blogs

    Aussies played their part in destroying Third Reich Germany and Japan. Now they are experiencing Karma.

    • Agree: Curmudgeon
  13. White Australia has a black history. So what? Who cares? Or did you think we don’t already know that? It’s like black lives matter. Oh really. You don’t say. The sign should read Grifter For Hire.

  14. Ed Case says:
    @raga10

    Aborigines haven’t been here 40,000 years, orb even 3,000 years.
    Their bought and paid for Leaders go along with the lie, not caring what it implies about their black and brown vassals.

    • Replies: @raga10
    , @Wizard of Oz
  15. raga10 says:
    @Ed Case

    Meh, the exact timing doesn’t really matter, but I see no reason to think it’s less than 3,000 years. I don’t mind giving them that one.
    As they are not exactly known for organising themselves effectively, or for that matter for buying and paying for anything, I really doubt there’s some grand Aboriginal conspiracy going on.

    • Troll: JM
    • Replies: @Ed Case
  16. So, was the movie “Quigley Down Under” another wokester inversion of truth or what? You know, that scene were Aboriginees are forecably routed off a mountain top by Brits? Hmmmm….

    When the same sort of inversion of truth is exposed regarding the African click-speaking Bushmen, let me know… If Aboriginee hunter-gatherer men could abuse their women… Maybe “the gods” aren’t “crazy” after all…. And did the Maoris do this abuse as well?

  17. The Jews have long been advocates for the oppressed,real or contrived,usually themselves but for others if it helps them to undermine the dominant host culture.

    When the shtetl Jews of Eastern Europe cheated the Christian peasants there was no sympathy for those they oppressed,and only a few brave Jews have opposed the brutal dispossession and expulsion of the Palestinians.

  18. Tales of Unrest from Rooshagger Colony.

    So when the Abo Ascendancy has secured the necessary ethnic miscegenation and replacement, except for the Jews of course, who then will not welcome the establishment of Israel Sud in the wide, brown land?

  19. Ghali says:

    “Australia is now a nation where White people are actively discriminated against, and where significant social and financial advantages accrue to non-White people”. This is the biggest misleading rubbish I have read anywhere. I have been in Australia almost all my life. I lived in the EU, Canada and the US. Australians, Whites in particular, are the most bigoted racist animals on Planet Earth. Try to be a Muslim Australian (with a Muslim name) and see how far can you go. The entire weight of Australia will be on top of you to stop you from breathing. Racism is deeply-entrenched in White Australians. It is part of their DNA makeup. The education system, the justice system, the police, employment, housing and sports breath racism to live. It is called elite racism. It is subtle, deeply-entrenched and enforced by more than 72 anti-Muslms draconian laws. Muslim communities around the country are under seige and live in fear of police brutality. Full-blood Indigenous Australians are not spared. Aboriginal death in police custody is as common as Fish and Chips in Australia.
    Further, those White Australians who identify themselves as “Aboriginals” are Whites who will never be Aboriginals. It is like having a sun tan. “I don’t want to be Black, but I love to have a sun tan”. It is good for social security benefits. It is also a good cover to protect them from being called racist against other. They can always say: “I can’t be racist. I am ‘Indigenous’”. It is like, “I cant be ‘anti-Semitic’. I am a Jew”.

    • Troll: Zane, Wizard of Oz
    • Replies: @Vox Australis
  20. Anonymous[276] • Disclaimer says: • Website
    @My DNA

    I agree . I wrote something similar about king tut being irish on another article on unz review. Then some genetic expert babbled on and on to the point that the dna picture was needlessly cluttered with worthless info.Many mummies from the oldest part of egypt’s history have light hair. And the,abos would be classified as caucasian as would a lot of east asian indians.Race can’t exclude color and color can’t exclude race as qualifiers

    • Replies: @Occasional lurker
  21. JM says:
    @raga10

    I have nothing at all against – real – Aborigines, in fact I respect them (as I always have since a small boy) for what they really are. But these newcomers and many of the others are fake. And the payouts to Aborigines in the form of “Land Rights” and Welfare is huge. And as a body they are largely disloyal to the Australian nation. In addition moves are being made to run a parallel parliament consisting entirely of aborigines which will be a manipulated running sore on an already ethnically near-overwhelmed Australia,

    What you say about Chinese (containing a dangerous Fifth Column) and the wretched Indians is also true and a great worry, but should not be used to obliterate the fake aboriginal problem.

    • Replies: @showmethereal
  22. JM says:
    @Priss Factor

    Some good ideas, but that’s not how it works. On immigration and just about every other question if interest to the Australian nation, the Aboriginal leaderships are anti-Australian.

  23. Ed Case says:
    @raga10

    Huh?
    Aborigines aren’t the ones claiming to have been here 80,000 years.
    It’s those mentioned academics, abetted by the Murdoch Press that keeps the lie going.

    • Replies: @raga10
  24. Ed Case says:

    Interesting about spook journalist Andrew Bolt.
    In 2009 he was calling Michael Mansell [the fat grey haired guy pictured in the black Treaty t-shirt]
    a Fake Abo.
    In 2022 he was quoting Mansell’s opinions on who was entitled to call themselves an Aborigine as authoritative.

  25. @Anonymous

    You just made a great argument for limiting anons to 50 words or less.

  26. Zane says:

    Poor whitefella my country!

    • LOL: showmethereal
  27. @Ed Case

    I’m inclined to believe some forbears of today’s Aborigines arrived in Australia 50-60,000 years ago but can’t see why it matters if it were only 3000 years. Why do you say it matters and what is your evidence for the lower figure?

    • Replies: @Ed Case
  28. @Pastit

    Fortunately I think it is hardly a problem to worry about in Australia and the recent identification of some people who really do have Aboriginal genes (and light skins) as Aborigines though brought up white is by no means an unambiguously bad thing or even the most expensive for taxpayers. Unlike the African-American problem (13.7%) Australia’s 3% Aboriginals don’t even look black after a couple of generations of interbreeding.

    I don’t know why the author thought fit to rabbit on about Ghenghis Khan or what, without adequate sourcing, was allegedly being taught about him, but, given how little history is taught these days I would be concerned if the nonsense about genocide was allowed to persist without effective resistance.

    • Replies: @mulga mumblebrain
  29. @Ghali

    Re Aboriginal Deaths in police custody: as long ago as about 1990 there was a government inquiry into Aboriginal deaths in custody. The inquiry concluded that in fact the death rate among Aborigines was lower than for non-Aborigines, however, while Aborigines (real or fake) comprise about 3% of the population, they comprise 40% or more of the prison population, due to their committing a disproportionate share of crime. In the city in which I live, the death of an Aborigine in police custody is front page news in the local newspaper, along with earnest articles saying that the death is due to the ineradicable racism of white Australians.

    • Thanks: Wizard of Oz
  30. The increase in the black population indicates that whites have stopped killing blacks in the last five years.

  31. raga10 says:
    @Ed Case

    Aborigines aren’t the ones claiming to have been here 80,000 years.

    I don’t know anything about 80,000 year claims – I think generally agreed upon figure is 30, or 40 thousand. In either case none of this makes the slightest bit of difference anyway because in my opinion wherever you are born you are a native of that place by definition – so anyone born and alive today in Australia, black or white or purple, is equally native.

    Which is why we should be damn careful about handing out citizenships: By the time migrants have a generation of children born locally it is too late to do anything.

    • Agree: Wizard of Oz
    • Replies: @Ed Case
  32. Since the Australian king, Charly come lately, is a fan of turning the tides on his serfdom (just like mommy did) and the world altogether, who wonders about anything crooked as hell can be?
    Who wonders about anything after the lockdown and Covid-terror the colonials have been put through?
    The Australian “elites” suck up to the Jewish Crown in London. Their loyalty is to London.
    Every Australian Primemixer has to get the approval of the Jewish ladies before he is allowed into office to fuck (up) the goy secretaries and fill his filthy pockets (as the two main tasks of every office-holder). Australians have on average a corrupted mind (like the rest of the world). They have a thin skin when it comes down to what is true and true is that they do not belong there.https://www.rt.com/op-ed/527804-bob-hawke-australia-us-intelligence/
    The “New World” – America, Australia, Canada, New Zealand – is generally a problem…, but what is not in todays Jewish world. It is a Jewish world.
    Aboriginals call the time before the arrival of “British subjects” dreamtime, which is wrong.
    It was the real time. With the arrival of British slaves and slave-drivers the nightmare began. It will end when the island sinks back into the ocean or maybe a stern China takes over from London (by sinking London) and hammers down every nail that sticks out.
    Australia is a sucker like the New World is in general. The New World already has the New World Order and is hellbent to put it over Europe in gratefulness for having left Europe for whatever reasons. The Aboriginals allowed the scum to land. Apparently they did not fight the invaders, but the invaders attacked the natives with all sorts of nasties. That has never changed. Australian “soldiers” are criminals wherever they appear. Ask the Vietnamese, ask the Iraqis, the Germans can no longer be asked… Such my compassion for Australians is a bit limited.

    • Agree: bike-anarkist
    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
    , @JM
  33. It is true that J-ws have been prominent players in Australia in the culture war between Aborigines and the rest of the nation. At present the Labor government is pushing for changes to the nation’s Constitution which would give privileges to Aborigines that are not available to everyone else, one of the most prominent figures in the campaign is Mark Liebler, a lawyer, I am sure Mr Sanderson could tell you more about him than I could.

    However, a prominent historian, William D Rubinstein, has written a number of articles on Aborigines, if you are interested you can find them online at http://www.quadrant.org.au. I have attached links to two of them.

    The Mistreatment of Women in Aboriginal Society – Quadrant Online
    The Incidence of Cannibalism in Aboriginal Society – Quadrant Online
    (I hope the links work).
    Happy reading!

    • Replies: @mulga mumblebrain
  34. Backward says:
    @Anonymous

    On the other hand, we are probably foolish too if we hope that the bulk of the people will wake up. No matter how absurd an idea, most people will believe it if it comes in the right emotional context. They have believed Christianity, liberalism, communism, scientism, they have bought into miracles, Moon landings, hijacked planes, magic injections… they even believe that the chemical trails sprayed in the sky are just water vapour, for heaven’s sake.
    So, where is the much-touted intelligence of the human race? And I’m not referring to the sheeple only, but to the conspirators too: how can they think they will prosper on a contaminated planet devoid of beauty and nature, and live forever inside silicon chips?
    It is just madness on all sides. The cerebral cortex is a failed organ that is driving our species to a precocious extinction.

    • Agree: Malla
  35. Dumbo says:

    Sometimes you can’t help but side with the jews and think, “Oy vey, those goys are really stupid and easy to manipulate!”

  36. Anon[427] • Disclaimer says:

    Most people I know in Australia have been abused numerous times and many have been assaulted by Aboriginals … Regards their domestic violence: “First Nations women are being murdered at up to 12 times the national average. In some regions, their deaths make up some of the highest homicide rates in the world.”
    https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-10-24/murdered-and-missing-indigenous-women-four-corners/101546186

    • Replies: @Kapyong
  37. Ridorio says:

    At the same time, Whites are attacked for being White in Europe – which is where Whites are indigenous at.

    As the saying goes:

    Africa for the Africans!
    Asia for the Asians!
    Europe for Europeans EVERYONE! And if indigenous/White Europeans don’t like that, then that’s BIGOTED and RACIST!!!! How dare you!! Why, there is no race at all just the Human race, didn’t you get the memo from our ((media programming)) yet you White Devil??!…But it’s not racist or bigoted if Africans say Africa is only for them or Asia is only for Asians, then that’s POWERFUL and ANTI-racist!! And if you don’t like that then you are a White Colonizer!!!!

    I may have missed some of the anti-White talking points….

    The ((elites)) want a White-free world, where the palest people are ((them)), and indigenous Europeans cease to exist as the closest thing will be a brown mulatto that practices Islam and has a IQ of 70.

  38. Bruno says:

    Does the rise of the Jewish community in Australia has something to do with the white bashing ? Is there some study on this aspect ?

  39. Miroslav says:

    So much B.S. in this article. I know many Australians who are completely biased against Aborigines but others praise them. If you want to know Australian aborigines read books by Wonga who understands them and has lived with them and married an Aboriginal woman. His books have been banned by the Australian government, but they are available in libraries.

  40. Whites in Australia are receivers of stolen land. It is a never ending crime, unless they go away.

    The Tasmanians were completely exterminated; genocid.

  41. Hahahaa…..what a funny article!

    It’s funny and interesting that in 2023 it is there are still minds out there that can deal with this issue in the manner Sanderson runs around here

    Time for humanity to get past all this…quickly now. We running out of time. The Khazars still got so many of us by the balls and the brains….

    Best to laff at the huge waste it is to approach whatever is there like this

  42. Realist says:
    @Pastit

    Sad state of affairs in OZ. The anti-white cancer has spread throughout the world.

    That is true. What makes it sad is Whites have allowed it to happen through their insouciance and stupidity. Western Civilization has had some tremendous achievements in science and culture. Still, these achievements were discovered, produced, and promulgated by those of high intelligence, inquisitiveness, industriousness, and inspiration, a minuscule percentage of the population.
    The fact that Whites are easily led has allowed others of low integrity to take advantage and control.

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
  43. lavoisier says: • Website
    @lloyd

    Total sheeple. I lived there for some time. Beautiful country. But clueless liberal thinking completely untethered from reality permeates their minds.

    I remember going out to dinner at an outdoor restaurant with some of my local friends once evening. From our vantage point I saw many women draped in the black hijab all over the place along with large numbers of Somalians. I casually remarked that massive immigration imported into NZ from the Third World was unlikely to be a positive development for their country given its obvious negative effects in other countries that have experimented with this virtue signalling folly. I was met with universal scorn and moral posturing for daring to suggest that importing the Third World into the West was harmful to the health of one’s nation and people. I even brought up the fate of poor Sweden. No effect. Diversity is our greatest strength.

    Imagine the clueless white liberal from Minnesota or Oregon who sincerely believes that blacks are victims and our greatest strength. No difference between them and the human dodo birds living in New Zealand welcoming the Third World with open arms.

    White liberals, no matter where they live, are truly the stupidest people on the planet and harmful to the health of a society. I think were it not for the white liberals drinking the anti-white Jewish Kool Aid many of the problems we face today would never have developed.

    • Agree: JM
  44. Shamu says:
    @Anonymous

    What are the children like when the parents have raised them to despise their own family? Don’t almost all those children engage in self-destructive behavior? Alcoholism, drug abuse, sexual deviance in all forms, self-mutilating, growing desire to never have children, desperate fantasies about being part of other families.

    And all those self-destructive behaviors make sense in that temporarily they relieve a nearly unbearable pain from the worst kind of psychological abuse inflicted by those who should nurture them.

    The Elites of a culture (hereditary nobility, the super rich, politicians, military leaders, educators, leaders of large and influential religions, etc.) serve as like parents in that regard for a nation, a tribe. When it is obvious, especially over long periods of history, that the Elites despise those over whom they rule, the ruled eventually will become a mentally unstable suicidal culture. Because it is either or escape to somewhere else physically.

    At what point in history must we go back to in order to find the English Elites who did not despise the clear majority of the natives of the British Isles? I’d say never. The first English Elites were the pirate ship captains of Saxon, Angle, Jute, and Frisian tribes that raised Britain after the Roman Legions had left. Those they conquered and terrorized were made their slaves or serfs, and they hate them as weaklings who had been conquered (their ancestors had been disarmed totally by the Romans for the previous 4o0 or so years). All Anglo-Saxon political culture begins with its Elites hating the vast majority of those it claimed the right to rule as worthlessly inferior beings who deserved all the terror thy suffered precisely because they were too weak to stop it – Might Makes Right philosophy in action.

    Surely the English became civilized, at least after Christianity, and such attitudes and practices ended? No. They changed with times, but they never ended. The leaders of that English world have always hated the vast majority of those who forced to suffer their rule. And they have used a divide and conquer all technique within the lands they rule directly as ‘home’ (the British Isles) as much as they have across the globe. That pattern is also seen in abusive family structures: the evil ‘parents’ pit some kids against other kids to keep them all from seeing the real evil and rejecting it.

    What occurred with the Age of Discovery was that slowly huge numbers of the poor and despised by the English Elites were able to leave from under their thumbs and go elsewhere. And everywhere they went, whether they were Sottish Highlanders or Lowlanders, Welsh, northern or western English, Irish Dissenter Protestants, or Irish Catholics, they quickly began founding communities that worked much better, much less abusive, than what they had left behind in the British Isles.

    In that regard, all Australian history has been those who became Australian having to try to fend off increasing London demands that they start acting exactly as English would have them do, in all things. And the more that would happen, they more that Australians would start to hate themselves as deserving of endless punishments for all the alleged sins of their ancestors. Once Australians no longer tended to have identities that always remind them that they were Australians because the English Elites had ruined Ireland or Scotland or Wales of the north or west of England, or every large English city for the poor, they would be left with only an Anglo-Saxon identity – in other words, an identity they they were actually those who had destroyed then worlds of their ancestors.

    Anglo-Saxon imperialism cannot end at any point for those who are descendants od its original butcheries: either they have ab hood very dear an identity that makes them feel deeply that they are not at all part of the English Elite world, or else they see themselves as part of that world and guilty for its nearly innumerable sins.

    Theologians who also are sound philosophers know that pattern produced by the most evil people, say child abusers, they make their victims and descendants of their victims embrace the evil that was forced on them.

    The WASP world had now conquered almost the entire globe, and this proxy war against Russia is to set uo World War 3 against Russia and China to actually conquer the entire old. That means that WASP values and WASP morality and WASP sins blanket the globe and are in charge – they are the rules setters, the trend setters. Those who wish to be ‘somebody’ must get in th line of WASP culture. And that means that whites everywhere, and not just in the Anglospehere, have become ever more culturally suicidal. More and more they crave annihilation for all whites. They have talon on the sins of the WASP Elites as those Elites would have them do, and they wish for the worst punishment they can think for such evil as endless WASP Elite imperialism: annihilation.

    Children who are hated by their parents always hated themselves. The only way to except the self-hatred is to find new parents new fathers. For whites, that means rejecting any part of WASP identity and then securing a new identity based on actual history of religion and ethno-culture (say, Irish or Scottish or French or Spanish Catholic, or Eastern Orthodox), and then working to rebuild historic Christendom.

    Everything else will fail.

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
    , @Anonymous
  45. usNthem says:

    It certainly seems as if the White race is on the downside of the hill of life. It was a good run, but it’s looking like it’s over. The really sad thing is the significant number of Whites enthusiastically cheering it on. Hard to comprehend.

  46. Mac_ says:

    The subject of other places being ground down makes impossible to deny the scheme here. First phot, guy on right seems schemer, consider w/ third phot on poser con, people continue to ignore how cons use stealth, among us. Had noticed over time ‘they baited the same welfare and distraction schemes there, as done here.

    Side note on first comment, good one copy few notes, paper pen better than copy paste, postal mail etc. Also, list reminds about four years ago, musk ‘flame throwers, twenty thous quick dispersed, then cut off. Convenient way lower level cons to get wepns. Could be used to torture people disabled by vaxs etc. Blurb from search, remember ‘sold out’ short time. – Flamethrower The Boring Company ‘ Elon Musk (@elonmusk) January 28, 2018. ‘ The zombie apocalypse may not have arrived, but we are always preparing for the future.’

    The bogus word ‘zombie’, no such thing, in my opinion word has been a setup, including m jackson ‘thriller. No one should use the word, and should stop others using it, also word ‘apocolypse. The cons murdered many over time, should label things as they are. Supposed tunnel co., seems front. Also this, boringcompany.com/burnthair
    note – ‘the flames begin Q1 2023’. What’s with that, would be ‘quarter one 2023’.
    People should learn connect with others, stop being ignorant. Thing is, a few minds better than one, and support each. Not big group, just small.

    Though post is as much side notes, article well written and worth read, not just scanning over. It’s disappointing knowing australians ignore possibilty to push back, had thought they were a tougher sort, though think scheming by the cons, combined with filth distraction, and breeder females, men let pressure down. Ignore too much, also in-migration there, same here.
    .

  47. Rich says:
    @Kratoklastes

    Sexual deviants do tend to cover for each other and to also install their brethren into high positions in whatever department they are running. I’ve worked for a couple outfits where an obvious homosexual is running a department and he begins promoting other obvious homosexuals until they are running as much of the show as they can get away with.

    It’s similar with Jews. If you allow a Jew to run your company, or put one in charge of hiring, pretty soon every department head will be a Jew. Too bad regular Whites don’t stick together like they once did.

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
  48. Worshipping stinky, stupid, ugly primitives is the most insane and disgusting thing that has ever happened on the planet. Groid and abo worship should be punishable by death.

    • LOL: Joe Paluka
  49. @Kurt Knispel

    You must be clinically demented, maybe by drugs, to emit a meaningless fact free rant like that. See a doctor.

    • Replies: @Kurt Knispel
  50. @Shamu

    What an intellectual (though inintellogent) wank. Where do you brew that garbage?

  51. @lavoisier

    According to the 2013 and 2018 censuses NZ’s Jewish identifying population declined from a low 6857 to 5274 – about 1 in 1000 New Zealanders.Why do you think it has anything to do with Jews?

    • Replies: @lavoisier
  52. I thought diversity was strength or something. Wasn’t it much needed diversity the British brought when they landed on the Aussie shores? So any problems the Aboriginal people had with diversity is due to their structural bigotry. White folks embracing a real or fake Aboriginal heritage are throwing away their beautiful inherit diversity. Very sad to see.

    • Replies: @anon
  53. Anon[318] • Disclaimer says:

    Australia does have a black history and we applaud it, celebrate it and wish it were to return. What better life could there be than roaming the back country, scavenging for grubs and insects and living in a cave, and constantly attacking the neighbouring group in endless reprisal raids.

    Without the aborigines, Sidney and all these large cities would not exist. Just ask Chief Janalli of the Gungarri Tribe. THEY built them, just like the Blacks in the US did and dont forget the Jobourg, Nairobi and the other large African cities.

    Here is a photo of the future Aussie Parliament. Enjoy:

  54. anon[318] • Disclaimer says:
    @Old and Grumpy

    I thought diversity was strength or something.

    It was a strength until at dawn one morning, the Gungalugoo tribe attacked the Bugaddoo tribe because one of its members ate some yams in its territory. A few months later, the Walgudu tribe wiped out most of the Gungalugoo tribe except for the women. They had a hardcore gang bang with the ladies. And the reason for the raid and killing ? A tribe member slept under a Baobab tree in sacred territory of the other group. One fella was beaten to a pulp and left for the Dingos.

    Diversity and MultiCulturalism makes us great !

    India seemed to have had the same problem between the Moslems and Hindoos. African tribes have been offing each other for centuries.

    Are there any other countries facing the same problem ? Hmmmmmmmm !! Lets see……..

    • LOL: Joe Paluka
    • Replies: @showmethereal
  55. eah says:

    … Bolt was hauled into court and found guilty of violating Section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act (the enactment of which was a direct result of Jewish activism). … The complainants, represented gratis in the Federal Court by the Jewish barristers Ron Merkel and Herman Borenstein, …

    You don’t say — as I saw it said some time ago: Jews or free speech, choose one.

    In this day and age, genetic criteria and a reliable test for them could be developed to settle the question of Aboriginal ancestry — but perhaps suggesting that would be seen as an offense too.

    It seems prudent to warn Whites that they ought to be ready for Western settlement to be treated as a kind of Holocaust Prequel™, as far into the future as they care to imagine.

  56. lavoisier says: • Website
    @Wizard of Oz

    One could argue that the main blame for NZ and the West opening itself up to the Third World has to be placed on the narrow shoulders of clueless white liberals. But even you have to acknowledge the hate whitey ideas circulating around the Western world have contributed greatly to this catastrophe. These hateful ideas have overwhelming Jewish ownership, support, and mass distribution. These ideas are destroying functioning Western civilization and have to be dealt with honestly and forthrightly. And those responsible for their genocidal hatred called out for the harms they have caused and continue to cause.

    Imagining that because Jews represent such a tiny fraction of the population that their influence could only be minimal does not reflect reality given their control of so many of the West’s cultural institutions and most importantly the media.

    The willingness of the Gentile to allow this control in their own societies is an important subject that deserves scrutiny and condemnation.

    • Agree: Che Guava, Zane
    • Replies: @Che Guava
  57. Anonymous[299] • Disclaimer says:

    There seem to be many benefits to pretending to be an Aboriginal Australian but how many of these imposters are also willing to pay the cost of being an Aboriginal Australian. Subincision seems to be still practiced in that culture and it is horrifying. Here is an intelligent gay Aboriginal man saying what subincision has cost him :

    Subincision :

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6637950/

    Don’t look at this if you have a weak stomach :

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Penile_subincision

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
  58. @Rich

    I understand the same is said about Indians in Silicon Valley.

    • Agree: Rich
  59. @Realist

    Whites, at least Protestant whites, started breeding dysgenically over 100 years ago so stupidity and insouciance taking over is not surprising. Fortunately Australia’s immigration policy and practice counteracts that ans will presumably keep smart Chinese and subcontinentals coming so long at least as Australia is exceptionally prosperous was well as free, safe and governed by law.

  60. Avery says:

    The caption under the picture says:

    “Anti-White activism in Australia is becoming increasingly strident”

    Boo Hoo Hoo: cry me a river.

    English convicts and their descendants have been practicing strident Anti-Aboriginal activism since they invaded their lands in 1788*. Took over the lands on which Aboriginals had existed 10s of 1,000s of years.

    As is the custom of English invaders, they proceeded to displace them, erased their ways of life, caused alcoholism, disease,….. forcibly took 10s of 1,000s of Aboriginal children from their families on bogus (White) “laws”, forced their laws and customs on the natives at gunpoint,…..the usual Imperial English “benevolence”………

    (White) Australian descendants of these convicts then dutifully proceeded to invade, kill, bomb, destroy…..various countries around the world on behalf of their Anglo-American masters.

    Youse are getting a taste of your own medicine.
    Enjoy.

    _______________________________________________________
    * On January 26, 1788, Captain Arthur Phillip guides a fleet of 11 British ships carrying convicts to the colony of New South Wales, effectively founding Australia

    • LOL: Wizard of Oz
    • Replies: @Anon
  61. You aint fooling nobody. We all know you be white. Whitie McWhite Face. Ha Ha Ha.

  62. anonymous[413] • Disclaimer says:

    Why don’t you all just beat up the Left?

  63. @Anonymous

    Mummies tend to have light and often red hair because of pigment decay, irrespective of their original hair color. That includes mammoths.

    • Replies: @Aninymous
  64. @Anonymous

    Subincision seems to be still practiced in that culture

    In what culture? The Wikipedia article you link cites an example of its dying out

    • Agree: mulga mumblebrain
  65. Summary of White Genocide in 3 Sentences:

    White guy stomping on indigenous guy: “Thank you blacky for all your land”

    Indigenous guy: ” But I didn’t give you my land, and please stop stomping on me”.

    White guy clutching his pearls: “Oh how dare you! Why do you oppress me? This is white genocide!”

    • Thanks: showmethereal
    • Replies: @JM
  66. Kapyong says:
    @Anon

    “First Nations women are being murdered at up to 12 times the national average. ”

    Yup, a big story – aboriginal women killed at 12 times national average – victimhood always a big story.

    NOT stated – aboriginal men kill women at 12 times national average.

    Mentioning black violence is as taboo here as in all Western nations.

  67. Che Guava says:
    @lavoisier

    Wiz is a moron. I visited N.Z. before the Jews started throwing their weight around.’

    Slept in the house of a Maori family. Even the Mongrel Mob motorbike gang did nothing the one time I encountered them, at what NZeders call a ‘dairy’, place with exceptionally good pastries, milkshakes, tea and I suppose bad coffee, I didn’t try the latter. One member even made friendly conversation.

    N.Z., though economically depressed by OECD standards, which are untrue, and visibly so at the time, was heavenly, except for a little of central Auckland at night, but that was alright, too, just stay distant from troublemakers.

    Christchurch had no mosques at the time and the centre of town and the Cathedral were very beautiful,

    moron Wiz would lie that the changes had nothing to do with Jewish activities.

    • Thanks: JM
  68. Aninymous says: • Website
    @Occasional lurker

    No the scientists who were commenting about the mummies having light hair took into consideration pigment decay. They were still puzzled by the light hair.! You have to remember the spanish explorers in south america mentioned that inca elders had light hair too. The modern liberal left wants to see all indigeous people having no outside influences till modern times .And the left definitely wants no white influence at all even if it stares them right in the face. It’s the commie bent always lurking in the picture.!

  69. tosca says:

    It could be positive, if it were not a jewish manoeuvre whose aim is to arouse hatred on the whites in order to move away and to swerve the hatred from the jews. Clear as rock water.

  70. Anon[318] • Disclaimer says:
    @Avery

    As is the custom of English invaders, they proceeded to displace them, erased their ways of life, caused alcoholism, disease,….. forcibly took 10s of 1,000s of Aboriginal children from their families on bogus (White) “laws”, forced their laws and customs on the natives at gunpoint,…..the usual Imperial English “benevolence”………

    All invaders of all races do the same. If you take some time to read your history you will discover that this has been a reality since our ancestors slunk out of their caves. The dominant race always subjugates or wipes out the opposition.

    Further, these tribes have been cleansing each other for thousands of years. The English did the same, only better. Whether right or wrong that is just the way it is all over the world.

    Question for you though. Lets assume the Aborigines take over Australia and govern the place. Would you live there ?? Would you live in any African country in this day and age ??

    I dont think so, unless your dream is to wander about naked hunting for worms and trapping small game while living in a mud hut, shitting under a thorn bush and drinking from a muddy stream.

    So, spare us the indignant self righteousness. No group in history ever got on top because they were nice ! There is no such thing as the noble savage. It is a brutish life with a short lifespan.

    • Agree: Backward
    • Replies: @JM
  71. Panadechi says:

    Remember the phrase: Lie and lie, that something remains.

    • Replies: @showmethereal
    , @Malla
  72. When you drain the barrel you always find a rotten Jew at the bottom. Just like the anti-apartheid movement in South Africa.

    • Agree: Zane, Backward
    • Replies: @Colin Wright
  73. Jiminy says:

    One thing that I’ve always been curious about is why haven’t I ever seen an abo dwarf. I did think that maybe they were killed at birth, so the gene was never passed on. I’ve never seen a Down’s syndrome black either. Although with the rate of fetal alcohol poisoning in the tribes, there’s really no difference between the two I suppose.
    Another thing I’ve never seen reported on is the number of aboriginal millionaires in the outback. Often small tribes own rights to mines and benefit greatly from the royalties, within their clan of course. Judging by the way a lot of the blacks live, they don’t like spreading the proceeds around.
    Here in my city we have a large number of Indian doctors both at the main hospital and in suburban surgeries. It’s strange, because if Australia was such a hole, then why do they come in their droves? Even the courier delivery jobs seem to be largely taken over by the Indians. I suppose if they can get around Bombay, then this little city is no trouble to them at all.
    There’s a small township in the top end, called Wadeye, that the blacks have largely destroyed through their inter-tribal fighting that still goes on today. For most of last year they were spearing and shooting each other there. It’s what we can look forward to when the “voice” is introduced by our current government.

    • LOL: JM
    • Replies: @JM
  74. @Wizard of Oz

    Lizzard of Ooze!

    More ooze from you?!

  75. @Priss Factor

    So..it’s like we are using their own opinions AGAINST them? Genius!

    High five, bro!

  76. Richard B says:
    @Anonymous

    considering the high number of brainless White cretins that pass for customers on both platforms, both YouTube and Twitter are highly successful at dulling the minds of the White masses.

    The masses are by definition mindless. They’re characterized by reaction, not reflection.

    When it comes to the masses two quotes and one book invariably come to mind.
    The first quote is from Voltaire, the second from Nietzsche.
    Once the people begin to reason, all is lost.
    In individuals, insanity is rare; but in groups, parties, nations and epochs, it is the rule.
    The two quotes fit nicely together.

    The book, of course, is Ortega’s The Revolt of the Masses. Published almost 100 years ago – it still holds up. Here’s a couple of quotes from that masterpiece.

    The characteristic note of our time is the dire truth that, the mediocre soul, the commonplace mind, knowing itself to be mediocre, has the gall to assert its right to mediocrity, and goes on to impose itself where it can.

    The mass is all which sets no value on itself──good or ill──based on specific grounds, but which feels itself “just like everything” … The mass crushes beneath it everything which is different, everything that is excellent, individual, qualified and select. Anybody who is not like everybody, who does not think like everybody, runs the risk of being eliminated.

    Both quotes do much to explain the quality of content and comments on Youtube and Twitter, and not just Youtube and Twitter. From this perspective the hostile elite didn’t have to work that hard. In fact, they mostly just let the masses do most of the work for them.

    The real concern of the elite has always been either a comedian who could tell a joke that might stick, or a thought-leader who might say something true and unforgetable.

    But even in those two cases all the elite would have to do is simply weaponize the mob and viola! Problem solved. In fact, in most cases, the mob being the mob, they don’t even need to be weaponized. However, this solution itself creates more problems that the elite simply ignore.

    What should really direct our attention is that this copy/paste response of the elite, and their constant toying with a mob they despise (and make no mistake about it, that contempt includes their pets, or proxies, as well) combined with their tyrannical prohibition of any and all feedback, is fast reaching a maladpative level.

    In any event, it’s worth considering that it’s not entirely a coincidence that Ortega’s book came after Darwin’s Origin, or that 1984 came after The Revolt of the Masses.

    Though Ortega did not use the word maladaptive, he did use the word catastrophe, as in human catastrophe. And a catastrophe would certainly qualify as a consequence of maladaptive behavior. Especially one involving billions of people.

    Whatever one has to say about the hostile elite, I don’t think it’ll take much to convince anyone who is paying attention that their behavior is becoming increasingly, and alarmingly, more maladaptive.

    This, it seems to me, is the real takeaway from all that is happening right now.
    Not just the hostile elite’s antiwhite hatred. But it’s absolute and seemingly uncontrolable hatred of reality itself. Because it is that, more than anything else, that will render a species maladaptive.

    • Replies: @martin_2
  77. JM says:
    @Kurt Knispel

    The fact that a sick POS like you was allowed into Australia is certainly indicative of a problem.

    • Replies: @Kurt Knispel
  78. jsigur says:

    The fact is that Jews are disempowering their white hosts and are willing to use all forms of lies and distortions to do so
    There, I saved you the ten thousand words you used to imply the same thing while distracting careless white readers into focusing on Aborigines as their problem in their reading

    • Thanks: Zane
  79. Those guys in the top photo are so cute, wearing shoes and trousers and all!

  80. JM says:
    @Anon

    True, except nearly all Avery said is based on carefully fabricated lies, aided by the (((Hollywood))) global propaganda machine which has clearly influenced even one as apparently as resistant as you.

  81. JM says:
    @Jiminy

    Your irony is spot on.

  82. raga10 says:
    @Olivier1973

    The Tasmanians were completely exterminated

    Not completely, unfortunately. Today Tasmania actually has one of the highest proportions of Aboriginal population in Australia. Their ‘purity’ might be questionable, but not their sense of entitlement.

    • Replies: @Olivier1973
  83. This is all part of the multi-pronged attack on whiteness and European identity (by the usual groups) whether it be government documents “acknowledging” that this or that school, government agency or what-have- you are occupying “territory” of such-and-such a tribe. The counter to this is to affirm that you are a White of European descent and you won’t fall for any of it. As a White person of European descent, you have the right to live, reproduce and occupy lands that were either yours for millennia or acquired over the centuries. Teach your kids about their white heritage and go to European heritage events. Organize, organize organize. Those that are behind this think that they are at the height of their power, but as always, they go too far and will be destroyed once-and-for-all.

  84. @My DNA

    If you want to have racial commonality with them you are quite welcome.

  85. JM says:
    @littlereddot

    That land was near valueless in a monetary sense under the aboriginal Mode of Production. It was the hard won development of Capitalism from the British pioneers that gave it the monetary value it enjoys today. That’s what you seek to parasitize on, not to return to some primitive way of life to which the Aboriginal people are heir.

  86. Gizmo880 says:

    When Whiteness, or European Identity, or whatever you want to call it is replaced in these cultures, after a very short while POC will be begging and screaming for it to come back when they get a reality check on what society will become then.

  87. This further proves that wokeness is just a form of progressive white supremacy. These liberal white Australians are erasing aboriginal identity and literally genociding them out of existence.

  88. Pure, unadulterated, dehumanising, racist EVIL, recycling every filthy race-hating lie spewed at the Indigenous by the Right. A real low, but very common on the Right, particularly the Murdoch cancer, in Austfailia. It wins votes, too.

    • Agree: Olivier1973
    • Replies: @JM
  89. @JM

    Under Indigenous stewardship, the land survived for sixty thousand, perhaps more, years. Under the mighty ‘White’ plague it has been near destroyed in two hundred, in order to rape the ‘monetary value’, all that the dead souls of the Right can comprehend, from it. Climate destabilisation will shortly render the place well nigh uninhabitable, another triumph for the mighty Whitefellas.

    • Replies: @Zane
    , @Anonymous
  90. @Kapyong

    Spoken like a Ukie guard on the Warsaw Ghetto. Nothing in humanity equals the worst racists for pure, Satanic, Evil. And Austfailia is INFESTED with this type, egged on, decade after decade, by the Right and the abomination that is the Murdoch cancer in particular. It wins votes from the worst in society.

  91. (((Academia geniuses with their self anointed PhD’s))) are pushing victim grievance BS to the extreme by twisting history and evolution to the point where Anglo/Aryan/Slavs/….were the greatest evil against POC since time immortal..

    If this keeps up, there will be bounties on white peepooz heads just because Jewish scholars and their den of thieves operating out of Synagogues of Satan wanted revenge for being thrown out of 100+ counties and Holocaust Survivor Hysteria Syndrome, now considered to be the greatest genocide in all history.

    (((Fact Checkers))) Now we know who does all the checking, even in banking.

  92. What I hate is the welcome to, or acknowledgement of, country magic words.
    They did it at the start of the cricket test between Australia and South Africa on Wednesday. First they asked the crowd to stand – and I did, thinking it was for the national anthems. But then some ‘elder’ starting talking about ‘first nations’ and which ‘nation’ allegedly ruled the Sydney region where we were.
    So I sat down again.
    I noticed a few others also remaining seated for this waffle, but almost all stood.
    I believe most older Australians will vote against the upcoming ‘Voice from the Heart’ referendum to change the Oz constitution – but all the younger Australians have been brainwashed with this woke crap and will vote for it.
    And that sucks.

    • Replies: @Australia Infelix
  93. P.T. says:

    Australia does have a black history. That is why blacks want to live in predominantly White countries. That is why they try to get out of Africa.
    lll

  94. Even the half-aborigines are getting spray tans, it’s ridiculous.

    Stan Grant is obviously making himself darker. Easily seen by image search.

  95. @Kapyong

    No, this was covered on 7:30 recently. Unfortunately, the only people they interviewed were a bunch of halfie hucksters telling us mo welfare “from the bottom up” is needed. Sure, a loving, non-violent childhood would dramatically reduce a person’s inclination to violence. Unfortunately, the state cannot afford to be literal loving parents to the million children living in violent families.

    Meanwhile the CBD shopping districts of Alice Springs, Darwin and other regional centers have closed down due to aboriginal terror.

  96. P.T. says:

    A significant number of those behind the blacks-should-rule type of movements are Jews. They are happy to instruct blacks on how things are to be run.
    lll

    • Replies: @Reverend Goody
  97. @Priss Factor

    If you talk to the Amerinds, they will tell you they are opposed to the mass 3rd world immigration that has been going on for decades. The “leaders” won’t say anything about it, because there is money in guilting Whitey, but no money in opposing immigration.

  98. Crocodiles have been around for over 200 million years, they thrived in Australia long before aborigines arrived. Who’s going to speak up for these ancient creatures who’s lands have been ravaged for thousands of years by humans?

    We have not yet closed the book on the evolution of species and natural migration towards vital habitats, life in the universe is spreading faster than the speed of light.

    We all arrived here via vital stardust, except blacks, they arrived through a black hole after destroying their own galaxy. That’s why they habitually burn loot murder and rape, it’s part of their genetic dark matter makeup.

  99. JM says:
    @mulga mumblebrain

    What is your ethnic background, arsehole. Your hatred of Australians makes this a burning question.

  100. @Zane

    I am a Zulu

    As a Zulu, are you ashamed for your invasion of South Africa and massacring the Khoisan – original inhabitants?

    • Replies: @Zane
  101. Backward says:
    @Olivier1973

    Someone who doesn’t have the faintest idea of how history or nature works will use the expression “stealing land”. The detachment of these types from the realities of life is absolute.

    • Replies: @Olivier1973
  102. Princeone says:

    I often wonder if the world’s white race will eventually realize that it’s the Jews that are behind the push to exterminate them. Most white Americans are ignorant of what is happening in their country. Feckless gentiles have been elevated into positions of political power by Jew money to carry out the directives of the Jew lobbyists.

    Whites can almost be forgiven for their ignorance due to the lack of trustworthy media. The Jews control all MSM; hence one only reads and hears what the Jews want us to read or hear. Thanks to alternative media, folks are starting to wake up. Hopefully, a mass awakening will happen before it’s too late.

    • Agree: Zane
  103. Mischa says:
    @raga10

    The increase in Aboriginal identification represents about one in a hundred White Australians choosing to change their identity to Aboriginal over a decade. I would say that is quite significant. These people are all either grifters doing it for more government benefits and career advancement, or anti-White activists, or both. All extremely harmful. While not a demographic sea change, this is a significant trend.

    • Replies: @raga10
  104. Ed Case says:
    @Wizard of Oz

    I’m inclined to believe some forbears of today’s Aborigines arrived in Australia 50-60,000 years ago
    Why do you believe that, in the absence of any proof?

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
  105. Ed Case says:
    @raga10

    I don’t know anything about 80,000 year claims – I think generally agreed upon figure is 30, or 40 thousand.

    Some Generals agreed on the 30 or 40 thousand year figure?
    DNA analysis says it’s 3,000 years at most.

    • Replies: @raga10
    , @mulga mumblebrain
  106. @JM

    It was the hard won development of Capitalism

    It was commerce, not capitalism. Commerce has made people wealthy for millenia, before the (((financial system))) including banks, existed.

    • Replies: @JM
  107. martin_2 says:
    @Richard B

    Both quotes do much to explain the quality of content and comments on Youtube and Twitter, and not just Youtube and Twitter.

    I watch youtube for entertainment and short videos to do with maths, science and chess but I agree about twitter. Twitter really does seem to attract the most ignorant and contemptible people. In a way that’s a good thing, since it means that they congregate there and stay away from everywhere else.

    • Replies: @Richard B
  108. @raga10

    The original Tasmanian people and culture was completely destroyed.

    • Agree: Ed Case
  109. Ed Case says:
    @JM

    What is your ethnic background, arsehole. Your hatred of Australians makes this a burning question.
    C’mon, man.
    Whaddya think ol’ Mulga’s ethnic background is.

    • Replies: @mulga mumblebrain
  110. @Backward

    Oha, someone who does not understand the difference between culture and nature. And does not understand nature at all too. Quite interesting!

    What is interesting with that type of people, if following their stupid racist ideology, is that they are doomed. The Asiatic people have a much higher IQ than the whites. And they are more numerous.

    Bye-bye! The collective west if falling…

  111. raga10 says:
    @Ed Case

    DNA analysis says it’s 3,000 years at most.

    Fine, let’s say it’s 3,000 years. So what does that change, in your opinion – other than getting them off the hook for being a likely cause for extinction of Australian megafauna, that is?

    https://www.monash.edu/news/articles/humans-caused-australias-megafaunal-extinction

  112. @JM

    Well…. you could always try Europe…. I can’t understand why people on this site don’t advocate for all whites to return to Europe from all continents… Then you all can completely stop all migration into Europe and nobody could claim. “Europeans for whites and whites for Europeans”. How about it?

    • Replies: @raga10
  113. @Olivier1973

    They claim they “civilize” others…. So that rationalizes conquering far away lands. Zelenksy and all Ukrainian officials use that talk to get more weapons from the west… Claiming they are the last stand of the “civilized world” so NATO should help them.

    • Replies: @Malla
  114. Anonymous[334] • Disclaimer says:
    @mulga mumblebrain

    Lol they killed off all the megafauna in Australia.
    They didn’t steward the land, they controlled it….with their firesticks.

  115. @anon

    Change the names and it sounds like Manchester, UK in the 1970’s…. Fights after football matches and in pubs… Drunk girls allowing themselves to get gang banged on purpose after a disco (now for money in porn)… Lots of pollution too… Not a “baobab” in sight. Only difference is maybe the architecture and paved roads.

  116. raga10 says:
    @showmethereal

    How about all Chinese returning to China? Come on, lead by example!

    • Replies: @Malla
    , @showmethereal
    , @JM
  117. Photo in the middle of the article…a fat White woman with a clinched fist.

    Why are fat women so obnoxious? You’d think they’d try to make up for their unpleasant looks by having a nice personality.

  118. @P.T.

    Like in Planet of the Apes, the Orangutans control the intellectual discourse while the Gorillas are the muscle. A racist book that Hollywood treats as science fiction.

  119. Malla says:
    @showmethereal

    Just like how the Han “civilized” and conquered Tibet and Xinjiang, Just like how the Muslims invaded tried to “civilize” India by destroying India’s original religion and culture, did not succeed but Pakistan is their bastard child. Pakistanis = Indians who think they are Turks and Persians and Arabs.

  120. Privileged whites wanting even more privilege by claiming to be blacks. What’s the world coming to?

  121. Malla says:

    Europeans had known about Australia way before they had colonised it. William Janzoon in 1606 had already charted Australia . As soon has he reached the Australian coast, he was immediately attacked by aboriginals, with some of the crew killed.

    James Cook was actually a liberal of his era and like most Europeans of his era, had bought into the “noble savage” bullshit and projected this on the first group of aboes he met (Same with Arthur Phillips). Even though his crew were attacked by the Aboes as they landed. Cook actually contradicted the explorer William Dampier’s first remarks in 1699 of the Aboes being a bunch of “miserable, dysgenic savages”.
    But later Aboriginal behaviour was so crap and horrible that even James Cook who earlier, ignored all the brutality and primitiveness of the aboriginals, just gave up, he could not take the bullshit anymore. That is why leftards who have a bad habit of cherry picking data (and twisting it) for their propaganda will concentrate on the later part of his life. When he finally was forced to become based. Cook was a considerable humanitarian during his earlier years but he was “f..ked over” so many times by the aboes that he could not take it very much. Cook’s interactions with Maoris and Native Americans were comparatively more peaceful unlike aboes.

    The earlier Aboes were extremely horrible in their behaviour in those days, just like today, except worse. Tribal rape to form matrimony to form peace treaties in between tribes was extremely common. As a way to make peace with each other, tribes would send their women to each other to let them do whatever they wanted with them. which was often extremely violent and rape and even murder was common. If the women came back un-beaten and un-raped then that was a sign that the other tribe did not want peace. LOL. And that meant war.
    Brutal rape was a rite of passage for matrimony including savage beatings, women were treated as stock to be traded. If a woman refused to take part in the ritual “sex parties” held for the elders and warriors, where women were passed around, they would be killed.
    The Australian aboes even did not have any concept of romance or love. This was unlike the Maoris next door. The aboes were too primitive for such concepts to evolve.
    Abo birth control method was to hit the pregnant woman in the belly, and if that did not work, the father was to crush the new born baby’s head with a rock. However this was quite common in harsh nomadic cultures around the world.
    Their mosquito control method was using stinky fish oil. They kept a rotting dead fish on their heads and as the fish rotted and the oil oozed out, running down their faces, after which they would rub it all over their body. And since the Aboes did not bathe, the early European sailors (whose hygiene was not top notch in those days) could not stand their horrible stink.’
    Even today the Aracoon Aboes in the Northern territories use spears to settle their disputes with spears. So the Anglos have not destroyed Abo culture after all.

    So now White people, who have built the most advanced civilizations on Earth and invented nearly all of modern technology have to worship these Aboes. Unbelievable. This is what uncontrolled Christian morality, uncontrolled enlightenment liberalism and Jewish/ Leftist brainwashing does to people. Makes them mad.

  122. Beware, Australian worshippers, there are a few millions of people in the south of India who resemble the Australian Aborigines very closely, they may be even genetically related. If they hear that their lookalikes are worshipped, they may descend in great numbers on Australia.

    You are warned.

    • Replies: @showmethereal
  123. Malla says:
    @raga10

    Chinese ale supeliol Middle Kingdom people, how you, a balbalian White devil can talk to them like that?

  124. Franz says:
    @Anonymous

    Please wake up you effing White fools.

    Waking up isn’t quite the issue.

    Whites were absolute BASTARDS when it came to upholding a visible nation as unconditionally theirs. It changed in 1945 for reasons nobody has to explain. While slightly different for all the English speaking nations consider how they’re all ending about the same.

    In or about that year, Harry Truman “integrated” the US military and it’s been held up as a successful integration ever since. For those of us who served in the military during those years, it was a rack of lies held together by career officers who were told it was their ass if the world found out the truth.

    On or about that year, American corporations started breaking the spirit if not the letter of the 1920s immigration laws by putting industrial recruitment centers in Puerto Rico and other nonwhite US possessions. It was the first breach leading to the collapse in 1965.

    On or about that year, mothballing and then quietly selling merchant vessels for pennies on the dollar to foreign firms began the shrinking of work opportunities for young Americans.

    But mostly in 1945 the confidence needed to be a bastard and hold a nation for free men just started to die, bit at a time. New sorts of “individuality” only made men suspicious of each other, not stronger.

    The easiest way to put it: It takes a gang to hold a turf, and in ’45 men all over the Eurozone stopped being a gang because… you know, we can’t be like Hitler, right?

  125. @Panadechi

    Education is very key… Proper education. A hawk can’t breed with an eagle… But a German Sheperd and a wolf can. An Australian aboriginal male could certainly impregnate the blond girl on the right in that picture. He probably is more virile than you and might be able to do so more easily. The kid might be 80 IQ… but they are indeed the same species. Race and species are not the same.

  126. @Olivier1973

    Most people believe that the last full-blood Tasmanian Aborigine was Truganini, a female who died in 1876, though it is said that another woman was taken to South Australia, and died there in 1903. Aboriginal society in Tasmania was destroyed in less than 30 years after the first settlers arrived there in 1803, in the 1830’s a missionary rounded up many of the survivors and transferred them to an island off the coast. Most of them died from introduced diseases, or from despair at the loss of their culture. Most of the so-called Tasmanian Aborigines are descended from women who were abducted by the sealers and whalers who lived on some islands in the Bass Strait. Almost nothing is known of the Aboriginal languages, I have read that a missionary translated the Lord’s Prayer into Tasmanian, and that is about all that survives.

  127. @raga10

    They should… But here is the issue. Chinese don’t try to conquer other continents and act like they did nothing wrong. And actually the white diaspora outside Europe is a MUCH higher proportion than Chinese outside China. But why let those pesky details get in the way – right?

  128. @Malla

    Actually Han didn’t conquer Tibet. They tried to intermarry with Tibet for peace during the Tang. It was the Mongols and then the Manchu who conquered Tibet outright. Han just continued it as they realize the non Hollywood version of Tibet couldn’t be pacified by intermarriage. But yeah Han did conquer Xinjiang – because the tribes there would attack their interests… But they let the Uighurs settle there unmolested for centuries – as long as they would fight off the Mongols and Tibetans.

    I can’t speak on India as I don’t know it… But the British Raj said they joined lands that exist as one entity – go figure…

    But what does that have to do with sailing across oceans to take lands and then complain about the natives????

    • Replies: @Malla
  129. Corvinus says:

    “ is the culmination of the establishment of an intellectual, political and economic climate that encourages White Australians to shed their racial identity.”

    More like personal decisions and a capacity by white Aussies to follow the will of God. He loves ALL people.

    • Replies: @showmethereal
  130. @Malla

    Pakistanis = Indians who think they are Turks and Persians and Arabs.

    THAT sounds very funny to my ears!!!

    What then do Indians who think they are Brits (or at least whites) = ??! Hint: It starts with an “M”

    • LOL: showmethereal
    • Replies: @Malla
  131. Richard B says:
    @martin_2

    I watch youtube for entertainment and short videos to do with maths, science and chess but I agree about twitter.

    Yes, I agree with you about youtube.

    It’s still got some good stuff on it, both educational and entertainment. And it was even better in its first few years, pre-purge. I was just referring to the kind of viewers/commenters and channels that the previous commenter mentioned.

  132. Malla says:
    @showmethereal

    Of coulse, Han nevel conquel anybody. Han supeliol human beings. Those Tibetan freedom fightels ale CIA agents. They do Hollywood animation when Tibetan monks buln themselves down in plotest of the occupation of their homeland. hehehe

    It was the Mongols and then the Manchu who conquered Tibet outright.

    And Han just keep Impelial possessions. How convenient, hehehe

    because the tribes there would attack their interests

    When China attack and conquel it is always justified. Becuz we iz supeliol Middle Kingdom, not like othel balbalians. hehehe.

    But the British Raj said they joined lands that exist as one entity

    Smelly toiletless Indian balbalians ethelnal sepoy of White British balbalians. We Han supeliol Middle Kingdom levulutionalies fighting impeliamlism. hehehhe

    Genius Han build the great wall supposedly to protect from foreign invasions which is now in the middle of today’s China. How smalt and genius. Hehehe

  133. Malla says:
    @Panadechi

    Send all Abo men to China to impregnate Chinese women and create virile peoples.

  134. @Hans Tholstrup

    No Australian reading this article approvingly should be paying to watch cricket. The Abo and TSI flags flutter over scoreboards, games are introduced with fake welcome ceremonies, and (in the case of South Africa) we’re playing a country with a racial quota ensuring 6 of the team are blacks.
    I know you probably love sitting in the stands and watching, but you might as well be wearing a t-shirt proclaiming you’re an invader and supporting the ban on Australia Day. Stop giving your money to them.

  135. @raga10

    The prospects for Chinese expansion in Australia are very limited because in addition to the sharply declining fertility rates of the Chinese the hostility toward China from the Anglosphere will ensure that Chinese immigration and influence of any kind will be closely scrutinised if they’re not rejected outright.

    The future of Australia will be Indian.

  136. @JM

    Jack off Mug!

    POS?!
    Positively Outstanding Service (not for mugs – from down under – make anyone chunder).

  137. @Ed Case

    Australian born and bred. I was once, briefly, rather proud of that.

  138. @Ed Case

    This thing is quite a typical Austfailian racist and wannabe genocidist. To prepare the ground for genocide, you deny the target population’s history and culture. No-one ANYWHERE in academia asserts a mere three thousand years of Indigenous settlement. I wonder where this vile troll got that-Skynews perhaps, Ground Zero for Evil in the failed State.

  139. @JM

    I do not hate good Australians. Many, somehow, still exist, but proportionally far fewer than, say, after WW2. I do despise Evil, racist, Austfailians, however. Ethnically I am a member of the human race.

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
  140. @Malla

    You could at least give a reference for that tract; I doubt it is based on your own knowledge and experience of Abos.

    • Replies: @Malla
  141. @Malla

    Those Tibetan freedom fightels ale CIA agents.

    At least you got that one right.

    • Replies: @Malla
  142. @JM

    That land was near valueless in a monetary sense

    Is the “monetary sense” is the only value of the land?

    If so, then that is strong justification for any rich land developer to simply stuff a cheque equal or more than the valuation of your ancestral home into your pocket, then promptly evict you from it.

    • Agree: showmethereal
    • Replies: @JM
  143. Malla says:
    @Commentator Mike

    Why don’t you ask for references from the Iron Duke? It is here that I think I got some of the information about a month back.


    Australian History: Settlers and Aboriginals part one


    Australian History: Settlers and Convicts part two

  144. Malla says:
    @Commentator Mike

    At least you got that one right.

    Yup the CIA promised them Tibetan freedom fighters that they would get support all the way till their homeland is liberated from occupation. But when Mao and Nixon kissed each other, the CIA threw the Tibetan Nationalists/ freedom fighters under the bus. What a backstabbing scumbag the US government is, depend on it on your own peril.

  145. Amor fati says:

    “…no wonder if the submerged, darkly glowering emotions of vengefulness and hatred exploit this belief for their own ends and in fact maintain no belief more ardently than the belief that the strong man is free to be weak and the bird of prey a lamb — for thus they gain the right to make the bird of prey accountable for being a bird of prey.”

    Nietzsche, The Genealogy of Morals, First Essay, Section 13

  146. @Malla

    Yeah, well, the white Australians were thieves, rapists, and other assorted scum unfit for civilised society and that’s why they were sent Down Under. So nothing much to choose between them and the Abos as you portrayed them.

    • Thanks: showmethereal
    • Replies: @Malla
  147. Malla says:
    @Deep Thought

    It starts with an “M”

    M? M? Oh you mean Mahadev Govind Ranade, the great social reformer and helper of the poor. How did he claim he was British? Go through his famous qoute again: he said

    “It cannot be easily assumed that in God’s Providence, such vast multitudes as those who inhabit India were placed centuries together under influences and restraints of alien domination, unless such influences and restraints were calculated to do lasting service in the building up of the strength and character of the people in directions in which the Indian races were most deficient. Of one thing we are certain, that after lasting over five hundred years, the Mohammedan Empire gave way, and made room for the re-establishment of the old native races in the Punjab, and throughout Central Hindusthan and Southern India, on foundations of a much more solid character than those which yielded so easily before the assaults of the early Mohammedan conquerors.”
    “Both Hindus and Mohammedans lack many of those virtues represented by the love of order and regulated authority. Both are wanting in the love of municipal freedom, in the exercise of virtues necessary for civic life, and in aptitudes for mechanical skill, in the love of science and research in the love and daring of adventurous discovery, the resolution to master difficulties, and in chivalrous respect for womankind. Neither the old Hindus nor the old Mohammedan civilization was in a condition to train these virtues in a way to bring up the races of India on a level with those of Europe, and so the work of education had to be renewed, and it has been now going on for the past century and more under the Pax Brittanica with results—which all of us are witnesses to in ourselves.”

    MALLA: What Mahadev Ranade claimed that a great spiritual nation like India ended up benefiting from foreign rule. In the first case, the Muslims invaded India and went on a looting, genociding, destroying and raping spree. Peaceful naive Hindu kings were not up to the task to fight back against barbaric greedy Muslim invaders. But after years of beating and humiliation from Muslims, after years of beating Hindus came out as fine steel. Soon native Indics gave rise to first class warrior people like Shivaji Maharaj Bhosale of the Maratha Empire and Raja Ranjit Singh of the Sikh Empire (who Ranande calls : old native races in the Punjab, and throughout Central Hindusthan and Southern India,). They fought back and the Muslim empires crumbled, Hindus were about take revenge, but the British came in and saved them. Now Hindu revenge plan will go on.
    So what Ranade says is that India and its native people ended up benefited by centuries of beating and humiliation they faced from barbaric blood thirsty Muslim invader peoples.
    Later Europe went ahead of India (and the world) in many ways and India was falling behind but the benevolent British Empire brought the high civilization and high education to bring high civilization and values to develop the people of India. So this way, India benefited after being conquered by the British.
    He never claimed he was British or white.
    P.S. I think we should thank China as well. India had a weak military, our foolish leaders were even talking about getting rid of the military and go the path of ahimsa of Gandhi. But China backstabbed and attacked India in 1962. out flew Gandhian values and the Indian Government after outcry by masses of Indian people, went on a military development spree. Today India has the fourth most powerful military and is a nuclear power thanks to the backstab invasion from China.

    God sent Muslim barbarian invaders and Chinese invaders against spiritual holy land India to beat us and make us brave and strong, to get us out of lethargy and cowardice. God sent the British to holy land to bring high values and civilization via English education. India always wins at the end.

    • Replies: @Deep Thought
  148. @Old Brown Fool

    I figured Malla – the resident India “scholar” would skip over your comment. He’s scared of people like you. He bows down to you…

  149. @Malla

    You have some strange obsessions man…. Don’t you have a British statute to go bow to? Or is this how you show your worship and devotion? This is about Australia… Get a life.

    • LOL: littlereddot
  150. @Malla

    You must have been bitten by the rabid dog– instead of having shot it:

    https://www.unz.com/mwhitney/the-plan-to-carve-up-russia/#comment-5747747

    Your tedious, incoherent and contradictory yapping is worse than those of Indian ultranationalists’.

    Tsktsktsk…

    • Replies: @Malla
  151. @Obsequious

    Good points. But if India starts to get really powerful the Anglosphere will turn on them too. They will find a reason to support Pakistan against India again. Btw – India’s birth rate is just above replacement now. But yeah they should have 30 years of pent up migration.

    • Replies: @Obsequious
  152. Malla says:
    @Commentator Mike

    white Australians were thieves, rapists, and other assorted scum unfit for civilised society

    Not really. You gotta listen to those videos. And isn’t it interesting that those, what you describe “thieves, rapists, and other assorted scum unfit for civilised society” of Anglo society could build a first world prosperous civilization where once the most primitive of mankind lived!!! A place where Asians (including Middle Easterners) and Africans (Sudanese) die to migrate to. The “scum” of a society built that!!! What the normal of most societies cannot. Amazing.

    • Replies: @Commentator Mike
  153. Malla says:
    @Deep Thought

    You must have been bitten by the rabid dog

    Woaw!!! WTF!! What kind of weird response iz dis? I gave such a wonderful and thoughtful explanation about Ranade’s thoughts.
    What an emotional outburst!! Calm down.
    Are you on your periods or something? Seriously!!

    • Replies: @Deep Thought
  154. Wait a minute. White historians, white fact checkers, white bankers, white academicians, white politicians, white scientists . . . all of whom upon invading Australia or colonizing Australia defined who, what, where when and how the original populations are or aren’t.

    Have discovered they got a ;lot wrong, and engaged in brutal needless policies, mildest of which was kidnapping children of mixed parentage to civilize them are some how victims of the world they created.

    Ket;s take your hopscotching about the place of women. The assessment of which is purposed to p;lace whites in some greater more superior position. That superior place requires a reckoning of history because a brief conversation with white women would include a long rendition of the woes that white men have visited upon white women from the beginning of time with the obligatory route through christian misogyny.

    look if in fact the white population had some bias against darker peoples by definition as history seems to indicate and that bias colored their every inkling, including research then it is a safe bet that the those whites women or men got a lot wrong, And westerners started their long trek into creating and thinking about those darker fold based on faulty research and did so for as the power group making their false assumption accurate,

    id you have ever been falsely accused of something, and that falsehood spread as truth to a large group of people — the ramifications were problematic to say the least. And what makes the matter more damaging is that some aspect might be accurate that taints the whole distorting the reality of who you are. But you incapable if unraveling that falsehood because the crowd has latched into that tiny truth out of context to the whole. Others controlling the narrative about you distorting reality. Essentially that is the current complaint by whites, that some other is telling a false narrative about white people. White women don’t talk of Catherine the Great, who sent thousands of men to their death, Queen Elizabeth, Queen Isabella, Queen Cleopatra or any number of ruthless women who ended the lives of others PM Golda Meir, Sec Clinton . . .

    It is a safe bet that the men of old Australia suffered more violence than the women of Australia as is the case the world over. More men have does defending women than abused them. And like men the world over men have died in the name of woman. As doe women with skull injuries, one has to ask a simple question, It’s speculation that those injuries were the result of some abuse. If in fact the women were as valueless as is claimed — there would be little point in burying them at all.

    Here are some modern statistics

    https://callsam.com/blog/slip-trip-and-fall-accidents-list-of-surprising-statistics/

    https://www.cdc.gov/falls/facts.html

    in modern times of grip coated floors tennis shoes, shoes period . . .. most falls occur on flat surfaces. So if the claim is accurate that the original peoples were nomadic imagine the pitfalls

    side note women fall more than men.

    https://academic.oup.com/ageing/article/45/6/789/2499223

    https://bethanylutheranvillage.org/why-men-and-women-fall-differently/

    I still stumble around from TBI and my female house mate falls more often than I do just around the house. Yesterday she opened a screen door and a spool of tape smacked her in the eye. Fortunately there was no bruise. Because aside from her injury my greatest concern was for her to be seen with a black eye and her explaining why . . .

    a social services visit to my footstep for sure.

    “Uhhh no officer she opened the screen the door and a roll of tape keeping it cracked open fell and smacked her in the head — well her eye.”

    several weeks later . . .

    “No judge, I don’t have anything to be remorseful about. i did not punch her in the face or ger eye either.”

    Several weeks later at the prison men counseling session . . .

    “No, it was a roll of tape that fell from a screen door that gave her a black eye.”

    Female counselor . . . “and men what do we call that . . .”

    Men in unison,

    “Denial”

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  155. raga10 says:
    @Mischa

    These people are all either grifters doing it for more government benefits and career advancement, or anti-White activists, or both.

    It’s a bit of both, for sure. But I think another large factor is they are simply looking for something to identify with – and they’ve been told that identifying as White is racist an a no-no, so they turn to alternatives. But this is not serious – much like women who go through experimental ‘lesbian’ phase in the college then move on, they can just as easily grow out of their aboriginal delusions.

  156. @Malla

    Yeah, well, there were a few Whites in the colonial administration who used the convicts as slave labour so built most of that, like the Americans with their black slave labourers.

    This whole thing of giving so much credit to Whites, as you do, is much the same as if someone were to give credit to the Jews for all those achievements you attribute to Whites. After all capitalism is the system controlled by Jewish financiers so without them putting their capital into development and industrialisation projects none of all those achievements of modernism you praise would have been possible. Behind every project of modern civilisation there is a banker and it’s most likely the banker is a Jew. Without the banker, you can take all the best laid out plans of the architects, designers, engineers, etc. and throw them on the rubbish heap. I’m not passing a value judgement on all this, just pointing out the reality of the modern world.

    • Thanks: showmethereal
    • Replies: @raga10
    , @Dream
  157. raga10 says:
    @Commentator Mike

    Yeah, well, there were a few Whites in the colonial administration who used the convicts as slave labour so built most of that, like the Americans with their black slave labourers.

    Number of convicts sent to Australia was not actually all that large: about 160,000 all up – but that’s spread out over the period of 80 years. By the time of last convict transport which took place in 1868 population of Australia was around 1.5 million so it’s fair to say most of Australia was not built by slave labour.

  158. @Malla

    White propaganda and lies. It was an agression and an invasion.

    https://redflag.org.au/node/5208

    • Troll: Malla
  159. Last May, the abomination that was the Morrison regime, the most Rightwing and malignantly incompetent Federal regime, so far, in Austfailian history, lost the election. Most of the gang’s ‘moderates’ were ousted by ‘Teal’ Independents, leaving just the sub-fascist hardcore.The MSM with its habitual cretinism and incompetence, opined that this would lead remains to turn to ‘the middle’, itself so far Right these days as to invite disgust and mirth at the same time.
    This, of course, was stupid crap. You can’t teach old pole-cats new tricks, so after a brief hiatus the Opposition recommenced business as usual, only more Rightwing than ever. Hardly surprising as it is now led by Dutton, a Queensland (think Alabama or perhaps Colombia)cop, as sleek of head as any suppository, and a rabble of ex-Army warmongers and she-male Rightist ‘women’ from business.
    Race hatred being absolutely essential in the pathopsychology of the local Right, and visceral hatred of the Indigenous in particular, it was no problem identifying a ‘controversy’ to unite the True Believer scum. The approaching referendum to create a ‘Voice to Parliament’ to represent Indigenous interests in the Constitution.
    Of course the hate campaign, having months to run, began slowly. The Murdoch SkyNews cancers could not help themselves so they were off the mark quickly with their usual ‘boong-bashing’ relish. Then the more Rightwing Opposition Party, the Nationals, the heirs of the land-stealing massacres and cleansings of the 18th and into the early 20th centuries, came out against it because it would ‘divide the nation’, a nation already divided by race, class, politics and wealth as never before.
    This of course is an issue that the racists will run with, and, I would bet, win with. At least, by my reckoning, 20% of Austfailians are hardcore racists. You see it in the abominable treatment of the Indigenous, the vile abuse directed at them, in the clinging to Big Daddy USA, in the hatred of China and the contempt for our ‘non-White’ neighbours. The racist vote has won election after election, Federal and State. The Government is playing stupid, as expected, by not outlining precisely the contours of any legislation, allowing the racists months and months in which to lie their reptilian heads off. A defeat, and EVERY State must vote in favour as well as ‘the country as a hole’, would be the catalyst to destroy the Government, the most Rightwing and grovelingly pro-USA ‘Labor’ regime yet, and hurl Dutton, our bunyip Bolsonaro, Part Two (Morrison, a Pentecostal loony, was Part One), into power. A Queensland cop as PM-Australia meets its destiny.

  160. @Malla

    Europeans are imperialists. plundering, killing and genociding people of the other continents.

    And they call themselves civilized, while they have a very long history of religious wars and started two world wars. And eager to start a new one in the hope to treat the Russians like the Amerindians. Too bad the Russians have some other weapons than the tomahawks.

    • Replies: @Malla
  161. @Obsequious

    Austfailia has already passed its safe population of c.twelve million. Contrary to Rightwing religion, there is such a thing as the ‘carrying capacity’ of a land for human populations, let alone greedy imbeciles bent on ever-increasing consumption and excretion as pollution, like good little cancer metastases. In any case the Indonesians will get here first, as the tropics become uninhabitable for humans.

    • Replies: @Amor fati
  162. @lavoisier

    Importing Moslems could be handled well, but importing the fanatic Wahhabists is a recipe for DISASTER. It would be like importing ONLY ultra-orthodox Jews, members of the RSS from India or Pentecostal lunatics from wherever. A country cannot survive when infested by religious nut-cases.

    • Agree: Wizard of Oz
  163. Anonymous[766] • Disclaimer says:
    @Shamu

    Jesus! Please learn to write more clearly.

    What are the children like when the parents have raised them to despise their own family?

    WTF? Do you mean when parents teach kids to hate themselves, the kids’ birth families/siblings, or the the kids’ own subsequent/separate families?

    Don’t almost all those children engage in self-destructive behavior?

    It depends. Alice Miller says that if the kids have at least one Enlightened Witness (EW), they’ll be okay. They might be depressed for a while, and/or angry, but not crazy or killers.

    (An EW is someone who lets the abused child know that they matter, that what’s being done to him/her is not right…even if the EW can’t change the situation.)

    When it is obvious, especially over long periods of history, that the Elites despise those over whom they rule, the ruled eventually will become a mentally unstable suicidal culture.

    Not necessarily. North American colonials who felt abused rebelled, creating the USA. Again, recovering from abuse depends on many factors: inner spunk, resilience, outside support, new experiences, etc.

    Because it is either or escape to somewhere else physically.

    “Either” what?

    At what point in history must we go back to in order to find the English Elites who did not despise the clear majority of the natives of the British Isles?

    What do you mean by Elites? Clergy? Lay leaders? Architects? Kings? Writers?

    Were all kings/queens the same…and none good?

    [MORE]

    The first English Elites were the pirate ship captains of Saxon, Angle, Jute, and Frisian tribes that raised Britain after the Roman Legions had left.

    Roman Legions “left” what? Were the isles empty when Romans arrived? Who took over when they left? For how long? How many pirate ship captains (PSC) “raised” Britain? For how long? Did they conquer Scotland, which Rome hadn’t? Was Willian Wallace a schmuck with no power? Were Scots slaves after the Battle of Bannockburn? Was Ireland the same as Scotland the same as Wales?

    You vastly over-simplify English history. Why?

    All Anglo-Saxon political culture begins with its Elites hating the vast majority of those it claimed the right to rule

    WIKI: “Anglo-Saxons were a cultural group who inhabited England in the Early Middle Ages…Anglo-Saxon identity arose from interaction between incoming groups from several Germanic tribes, both amongst themselves, and with indigenous Britons. Many of the natives, over time, adopted Anglo-Saxon culture and language and were assimilated. The Anglo-Saxons established the concept, and the Kingdom, of England…between about 450 and 1066…the Norman Conquest.”

    Hardly seems terrorizing.

    WIKI: “The early Anglo-Saxon period includes the creation of…regional government of shires and hundreds…Christianity was established and there was a flowering of literature and language. Charters and law were also established.”

    Again…”terror-filled”?

    WIKI: “Threatened by extended Danish Viking invasions and military occupation of eastern England, this identity…dominated until after the Norman Conquest….[T]here are strong elements of tribal and lordship ties. The elite declared themselves kings who developed burhs…The term Anglo-Saxon began to be used…to distinguish ‘Germanic’ groups in Britain from those on the continent.”

    Hardly seems like the lives of conquered folks under Genghis Khan.

    The leaders of that English world have always hated the vast majority of those…forced to suffer their rule.

    Honestly, it sounds like you’ve always had a hate boner for Brits. Again, why? Is/was every other group better? Or are you just jealous?

    they have used a divide and conquer all technique

    Many peoples and places have. I dare say most.

    Now, not for nothing but: note your trouble with England’s language. Your writing is filled with botches. Which leads me to believe you hardly know Brits. I mean, who writes “divide and conquer all” instead of just “divide and conquer”?

    Then there are these pearls:

    all Australian history has been those

    ruined…every large English city for the poor

    destroyed then worlds

    get in th line

    except the self-hatred

    descendants od its original butcheries

    they have ab hood very dear

    war against Russia is to set uo

    they more that

    conquer the entire old

    They have talon on the sins

    huge numbers of the poor and despised by the English Elites were able to leave

    Why? Famines? Better opportunities elsewhere? Enslavement? Pressed into service? Plus what was life like in other, contemporary societies?

    You sound like BLM blowhards who never compare Whites to other groups, America to other nations.

    founding communities that worked much better, much less abusive, than what they had left behind in the British Isles.

    You write as if elites in India, China, etc. were kinder and gentler. Did British elites burn widows alive? Kill unfortunates with a “thousand cuts”? You omit how life was “brutal and short” for many groups. Hell, it was expected that 40% of UK sailors would die during long voyages from scurvy alone.

    Australian history has been…having to try to fend off increasing London demands

    Like American history?

    Did Brits ever have to fend off Vikings, Normans, and others?

    Australians would start to hate themselves as deserving of endless punishments for all the alleged sins of their ancestors.

    Meh. That’s recents…and mostly due to CRT crapola. Aussies were known for being tough soldiers, but laid-back civilians: surfers, bogans, Fosters drinkers, Crocodile Dundees, and bogans who liked sheilas and “puttin’ another Ken on the Barbie” for tourists.

    Anglo-Saxon…descendants…feel deeply that they are not at all part of the English Elite world, or…guilty for its nearly innumerable sins.

    Says who? Did you not watch the pageantry of Queen Elizabeth’s jubilee? Did you miss all the pride Brits exhibited in their heritage?

    The WASP world had now conquered almost the entire globe

    As other, non-English empires had in the past.

    WASP values and WASP morality and WASP sins blanket the globe

    Lions and tigers and bears, oh my!

    Look, I’m not papering over Britain’s flaws. I’m just putting them in perspective. I mean, who is more cringeworthy and shame-bringing: Wills and Kate or Harried and Nutmeg?

    If you look solely for British flaws and failings, you will find them. Why not be fair, though, and mention UK triumphs…like ending slavery? Your breezy conclusions are suspect…like your not taking the time to proof-read your comments.

    Those who wish to be ‘somebody’ must get in th line of WASP culture.

    Why? And what, exactly, is “WASP culture”? And how many are forced to follow it, how many willingly emulate it. Is AMERICA culture forced on the world? Do folks around the world listen to US music, watch US films with guns held against their heads?

    whites everywhere, and not just in the Anglospehere, have become ever more culturally suicidal.

    Not because British Elites make them be that way. Quite the opposite: because they no longer act like take-no-shite, empire-building, can-do Brits.

    Children who are hated by their parents always hated themselves.

    Again, wrong. Many hated their parents. Many were protected by relatives. Many were stuck in toxic homes but had outside “angels” helping-comforting-guiding them.

    For whites, that means rejecting any part of WASP identity

    Including the part that created the Magna Carta? That founded America? That gave the world Wren and Shakespeare and Olivier?

    What fuels your seemingly bottomless hatred for Brits?

  164. @Ed Case

    Because I don’t believe all the scientists attesting to it are deluded, dishonest or stuck with a conventional wisdom for any of the reasons that can happen.

  165. Anonymous[766] • Disclaimer says:
    @EliteCommInc.

    White historians, white fact checkers, white bankers, white academicians, white politicians, white scientists . . .

    Yes, Whites are quite an accomplished cadre. They built most of the modern world. Plus they founded many excellent universities, filling them with academics, academicals, and academicians!

    upon invading Australia

    With prisoners? Did Britain use Oz as a puerile punitive penile penal colony?

    defined who, what, where when and how the original populations are or aren’t.

    Like categorizing exotic, new-found plants? Should explorers have treated abbos as dead dodos?

    they got a ;lot wrong

    Mistaking boomerangs for howitzers?

    engaged in brutal needless policies

    Unlike natives who engaged in cannibalism, rapine, child murders, torture, and wife-beating?

    kidnapping children of mixed parentage to civilize them

    “Mixed” with/by whom?

    And how is showing Abbo kids Western orchestras harmful? Should they have remained ignorant, thinking the only instrument in the world was the didgeridoo?

    a brief conversation with white women would include a long rendition of the woes that white men have visited upon white women

    And vice versa. Bints ain’t no saints, sista!

    FACT: women are now…and have historically always been…the main abusers/neglecters of children and the elderly. They also start half the domestic fights with men…and all in lesbian couples (the worst in terms of savagery). There have also been zero wars fought that weren’t instigated/supported by women.

    christian misogyny.

    [MORE]

    You mean the Christianity that protects women, gives them the choice to pick mates, and marry (or not)? That Christianity…the one that reveres the Sacred Mother?

    the white population had some bias against darker peoples

    As have many others…including African groups.

    that bias colored their every inkling

    Yup. Just ask Hutus about Tutsis.

    those whites women or men got a lot wrong

    Like BLM bozos, CRT crazies, Black Panther putzes, and sundry minority leaders did/do per Whites.

    id you have ever been falsely accused of something

    Like having “privilege” and “unconscious bias”?

    you incapable if unraveling that falsehood because the crowd has latched into that tiny truth out of context to the whole

    Agreed. Kendi, Okrah, Jackson, Sharpton, DiAngelo, Dyson, Reid, Johnson, Brazile, Martin, Hill, et alia are all nutters who falsely accuse Whites.

    White women don’t talk of Catherine the Great, who sent thousands of men to their death, Queen Elizabeth, Queen Isabella, Queen Cleopatra or any number of ruthless women who ended the lives of others

    Too true. Yet compare them to the millions upon millions of irresponsible, obese, whale-sized, waddling ham-planet welfare quanes who…being lazy, promiscous, and enstupidated sheboons…birth 75% [SEVENY-FIVE PERCENT!] of black chirrenz as fatherless bastards…dooming them to join gangs, rob stores, murder each other, and destroy America!

    More men have does defending women than abused them.

    Is that a sentence on your planet?

    women fall more than men

    Good to know. Yet feminists swear that women are smarter than men…and never-ever-EVAH fall for scams.

    Who knew?

    I still stumble around from TBI and my female house mate falls more often than I do

    Interesting. Personally, I like to flap my arms and yell “Poo tee weet!” when drinking IPAs.

    Yesterday she opened a screen door and a spool of tape smacked her in the eye.

    “Bad spool! Go to your room. Now!”

    my greatest concern was for her to be seen with a black eye

    Racist! There’s nothing wrong with dating a black guy.

    Now, name a river in Egypt.

    “Denial”

    Correctomundo. Fifty points for Gryffindor!

  166. Zane says:
    @Curmudgeon

    Hint: I’m not really a Zulu. I was taking the pizzola. I haven’t massacred anyone recently. That’s not how I roll.

  167. DiannaG says:

    I look white. But as well as all the North European and British and West African and Middle Eastern genes, I have Tasmanian Aboriginal and probably also Nunga from South Australia in me. I don’t identify as Aboriginal; I’m an AUSSIE. But more than that, I’m a citizen of the world and member of Humanity. Show me a genetically pure white person, or a genetically pure black person? DNA shines a light on the myth of race. I wish everyone would just stop using it as any kind of bargaining chip/hobby horse/justification/judgment, by anyone, of anyone. Period.

    • Thanks: showmethereal
  168. Amor fati says:
    @mulga mumblebrain

    Right wing elites and their religion of resourcism do balk at the concept of carrying capacity while profligate left-wing elites give it occasional lip service. However, conservatives who work the land, i.e. those who must walk their talk every day, are well aware of limits. Albeit they may use different expressions for their land ethic.

    p.s. Carrying capacity for a given area is not such a fixed number for human beings. I am confident Australia could accommodate many more than twelve million if genetic engineers made people one quarter their present size. This would also be an appropriate adjustment for all their missing spines.

    Conversely, what would the carrying capacity be in Australia today if everyone lived as the Aborigines did centuries ago? If it still stood at 12 million, ha, what would the infant mortality and murder rates be? What/who would be on the dinner plate tonight? (Is this what the morality mob laments?)

    • Replies: @raga10
    , @Commentator Mike
  169. raga10 says:
    @Amor fati

    Conversely, what would the carrying capacity be in Australia today if everyone lived as the Aborigines did centuries ago?

    If everyone lived like Aborigines did, it stands to reason the population would also be around what it was back then: less than one million. Apparently that was the number that their lifestyle supported, whatever the carrying capacity of the land might be.

  170. “Yes, Whites are quite an accomplished cadre. They built most of the modern world. Plus they founded many excellent universities, filling them with academics, academicals, and academicians!

    “With prisoners? Did Britain use Oz as a puerile punitive penile penal colony?”q111

    “Like categorizing exotic, new-found plants? Should explorers have treated abbos as dead dodos?”

    “Mistaking boomerangs for howitzers?”

    “Unlike natives who engaged in cannibalism, rapine, child murders, torture, and wife-beating?”

    “Mixed” with/by whom?

    And how is showing Abbo kids Western orchestras harmful? Should they have remained ignorant, thinking the only instrument in the world was the didgeridoo?”

    “FACT: women are now…and have historically always been…the main abusers/neglecters of children and the elderly. They also start half the domestic fights with men…and all in lesbian couples (the worst in terms of savagery). There have also been zero wars fought that weren’t instigated/supported by women.”

    “You mean the Christianity that protects women, gives them the choice to pick mates, and marry (or not)? That Christianity…the one that reveres the Sacred Mother?
    the white population had some bias against darker peoples”

    As have many others…including African groups.

    Yup. Just ask Hutus about Tutsis.

    Like BLM bozos, CRT crazies, Black Panther putzes, and sundry minority leaders did/do per Whites.

    “Like having “privilege” and “unconscious bias”?”

    “Agreed. Kendi, Okrah, Jackson, Sharpton, DiAngelo, Dyson, Reid, Johnson, Brazile, Martin, Hill, et alia are all nutters who falsely accuse Whites.”

    “Too true. Yet compare them to the millions upon millions of irresponsible, obese, whale-sized, waddling ham-planet welfare quanes who…being lazy, promiscous, and enstupidated sheboons…birth 75% [SEVENY-FIVE PERCENT!] of black chirrenz as fatherless bastards…dooming them to join gangs, rob stores, murder each other, and destroy America!”

    “Good to know. Yet feminists swear that women are smarter than men…and never-ever-EVAH fall for scams.”

    ————————-

    [MORE]

    Hmmmmm . . . interesting response. Though I am not sure where you are headed. To clarify my position.

    In short, there is no evidence that whites of Australia are worshipping aboriginals. But instead a reckoning of who gets to tell the original peoples stories of themselves. That with the addition of alternative narratives a fuller truth is revealed. Hmmm well, there is no issue with accomplished whites. Trying to change the subject about the achievements of whites does not impact how said acknowledged bias impacts how that achievement is utilized in dealing with others in this case the story of aboriginals.

    https://theconversation.com/on-the-wrong-track-why-australias-attempt-at-indigenous-reconciliation-will-fail-58064

    https://www.thoughtco.com/injustices-of-the-past-and-present-4082434

    https://education.blurtit.com/776876/how-did-the-white-settlers-treat-the-aborigines

    Australians reckoning with their past treatment of the original does amount to said worship.

    https://www.creativespirits.info/aboriginalculture/people/stereotypes-prejudice-of-aboriginal-australia

    And all this by well educated successful white: doctors, lawyers, judges, academicians . . . etc. nothing in my comments denigrates achievement.

    Point of fact, absolutely. With prisoners and ne’re do wells.

    Ahhh, well you seem to have stumbled onto something: cannibalism . . . etc. All practices, and behaviors, conditions attributable to whites — in other words, aboriginals have attributes similar to whites in various points in time and even existent in the present, i.e. wife abuse — not an unheard concern among high achieving whites. So the issue as it pertains to women is mighty weak. And why I took some time to consider the refence to women buried with damaged skulls and why it might not be signs of abuse at all.

    Absolutely nothing wrong with educating children. There is something amiss with kidnapping them to so educate. As for your question regarding “mixed” I think I will leave room to search the matter out on your own.

    I am not sure you grasp my context of my comment. I am not making arguments about Christianity being abusive to women. I merely acknowledging what any number of women will say on the matter. So, clearly perspectives on the mistreatment of women is a construct of white society. That is the point, that noting such conducting as if it is unique to aboriginals fails.

    I think as long as we agree, as you seem to acknowledge that the negative attributes are not unique to darker peoples.

    This comment,

    “”Too true. Yet compare them to the millions upon millions of irresponsible, obese, whale-sized, waddling ham-planet welfare quanes who…being lazy, promiscous, and enstupidated sheboons…birth 75% [SEVENY-FIVE PERCENT!] of black chirrenz as fatherless bastards…dooming them to join gangs, rob stores, murder each other, and destroy America!”

    makes absolutely no sense to the discussion, however, there is not a single attribute above that does not apply to whites

    https://www.huffpost.com/entry/no-most-black-kids-are-no_b_11109876

    https://www.complex.com/pop-culture/2015/05/the-cdc-has-debunked-the-absent-black-father-myth

    https://afropunk.com/2019/09/no-andrew-sullivan-70-percent-of-black-kids-arent-fatherless/

    Sure, I agree two parent families are the best way forward for kids. But that isn’t all directly relevant to the issues on the table. As for the destruction of the country. If the country is headed toward destruction and that may well be. It’s not the fault of the 12 or 14% of the population. Still in every category the country is owned and operated by whites. And if the country fails it will be at their hands.

    1. wall street crashes, the last one still reverberating and rocking the country millions of lost homes, lost employment

    2. murdering children in the womb

    3. no fault divorce

    4. pornography

    6. damaging immigration policy since the 1900’s

    7. tax policies that exacerbate unfairly income disparity

    8. corporate insider government manipulation

    9. Needless use of the the US military —

    10. foreign policy leadership

    and aside from asians whites if one wants to play that game are responsible for the most devastating global conflicts

    It’s a losing game when one wants to start assigning blame for the country’s woes — sadly since whites hold the cards — whites must be assigned responsibility. Even if one want to blame the poor it would be whites who have been on government assistance en masse since the new deal — blacks as a population did not get welfare until the 1960’s. Let’s not get into a discussion about how and why — it just further indicts whites.

    —————————————-

    I took the time to address your issues, many of which reinforce my point. Reckoning with your country’s past in mistakes in how they created narratives and treating others accordingly is bound to have some bumps in the road. And that is what is happening in Australia and to some extent among countries that have exercised power dynamics based on skin color.

  171. Zane says:

    And to no one’s surprise it’s Australia’s influential Jewish lobby which is behind much if not all of the wokeist aboriginal nonsense and other crap including the transgender agenda. Why Jews identify so much with men in dresses I have no idea, but I think a psychiatrist would find fertile fields of research there. Remember, it’s some VB swilling bogan operating a digger in the Pilbara which is paying for ” abos ” to drive Toyota Land cruisers to their pow wows.

    • Troll: mulga mumblebrain
  172. @Amor fati

    Funnily enough Australia is often mentioned in debates about how many people could fit into it. Some say that the entire world population could “fit” into Australia, or even trillions of people. But do these debaters ever consider the resources required to sustain people indefinitely in that space? Sure, you could fit the entire world population like sardines even in a much smaller space but then you need to feed them.

    • Replies: @mulga mumblebrain
  173. @showmethereal

    You’re right, but with China it’s a little different, though. Anglos have always hated the Chinese and in the case of Australia it’s also a part of their fear of being “swamped by Asians” in general.

    Plus, Indians play cricket and kinda speak English and so they’re alright. Who knows, we might even see an Indian become prime minister in Australia in the not so distant future (a la Rishi Sunak in the UK).

    • Replies: @Malla
    , @showmethereal
  174. Malla says:
    @Deep Thought

    See.. the hysterical rant

    That is a hysterical rant? really? LMFAO Are you smoking something? Put down the pipe before coming to Unz, my humble request.

    • Replies: @Deep Thought
  175. Malla says:
    @Obsequious

    Anglos have always hated the Chinese

    What? What? What? That is the dumbest B.S. I have ever heard.

    Lets take the example of Sir John Francis Davis, 1st Baronet, British imperial colonial officer and brother of Samuel Davis English diplomat who later became a director of the East India Company wrote thus about China in 1830s

    “As regards the peaceful and orderly character by which the Chinese, as a nation, have been distinguished, there is much truth in another remark of Montesquieu, namely, that the government had this object in view when it prescribed a certain code of ceremonies and behaviour to its subjects ; ” a very proper method of inspiring mild and gentle dispositions, of maintaining peace and good order, and of banishing all the vices which spring from an asperity of temper.” They certainly are, upon the whole, among the most good-humoured people in the World, as well as the most peaceable ; and the chief causes of this must be sought for in their political and social institutions. Of the sixteen lectures periodically delivered to the people, the second is ” on union and concord among kindred ; ” the third, ” on concord and agreement among neighbours ; ” the ninth, ” on mutual forbearance ; ” the sixteenth, ” on reconciling animosities.”

    …snip…

    “The Chinese have lived so much in peace, that they have acquired by habit and education a more than common horror of political disorder. ”

    …snip…

    “There is, in short, a businesslike character about the Chinese which assimilates them in a striking manner to the most intelligent nations of the West, and certainly marks them out, in very prominent relief, from the rest of the Asiatics. However oddly it may sound, it does not seem too much to say, that, in everything which enters into the composition of actively industrious and well-organized communities, there is vastly less difference between them and the English, French, and Americans, than between these and the inhabitants of Spain and Portugal, whose proneness to stolid bigotry and oriental laziness was perhaps in part imbibed from the Arabs.”

    …snip….

    It has often been remarked, that a finer-shaped and more powerful race of men exist nowhere than the coolies, or porters of Canton, and the weights which they carry with ease on a bamboo, between two of them, would break down most others. The freedom of their dress gives a development to their limbs that renders many of the Chinese models for a sculptor. As sailors, they have been found always much stronger and more efficient than Lascars on board of English ships (A lascar was a sailor or militiaman from the the Arab world, Indian Subcontinent, Southeast Asia or Somaliland), though the obstacles which exist to their entering into foreign service prevent their being frequently engaged.”

    If you ask me, it is the other way round, many (not all) Chinese have always hated the Anglos.

  176. Malla says:
    @Olivier1973

    Europeans are imperialists. plundering, killing and genociding people of the other continents.

    People have been conquering each other from the beginning of time. European empires, with few exceptions were always more benevolent than what existed before them. Thanks to European Empires the quality of life of hundreds of millions of non Whites improved dramatically. Whether it be the emancipation of lower caste Hindus or stopping slavery in Africa, in many ways European empires have improved the World enormously.

    And they call themselves civilized, while they have a very long history of religious wars and started two world wars.

    Humans have been fighting wars since the beginning of time and will always do so. Europeans really are more civilized but that is debatable in some respects. One civilized people are considered barbarians by the others. Hindus consider Muslims barbarians/ dirty mlecha, Muslims consider idol worshiping Hindus as kaffirs, as barbarians.

    And eager to start a new one in the hope to treat the Russians like the Amerindians

    Russians are White. When Japan defeated Russia, in the Russo-Japanese war in the beginning of the 20th century all of Asia went wild and happy because Asians had defeated Europeans. Turks, Iranians, Burmese, Indians, all were full of hope and new faith, that is was possible for Asians to defeat White people.
    And didn’t the Russian Empire conquer Siberia with their native Siberian populations like the Yakuts? Central Asia? Alaska with their Inuit populations?

  177. @Corvinus

    You would be correct but these people are disciples of Cecil Rhodes.

  178. @Obsequious

    Indeed. They were able to subjugate all of India while only getting ports in China. Hence India is “safe” and China is “dangerous”. While I agree about cricket and English – it can only go as far as the country of India develops. Remember Japan was the US favorite poodle – until the 1980’s when Japan was passing the US in many fields. Then they became “Japs” again who wanted to buy up the world. So we got the Plaza Accords and the dismantling of the semiconductor industry…. No way to tell how high India can get up the ladder – but if they get anywhere close to what Japan or China achieved – they will face the same treatment. Question is if that happens would they bow like Japan or stand like China.

    • Replies: @Malla
  179. Dream says:
    @Commentator Mike

    This whole thing of giving so much credit to Whites, as you do, is much the same as if someone were to give credit to the Jews for all those achievements you attribute to Whites. After all capitalism is the system controlled by Jewish financiers so without them putting their capital into development and industrialisation projects none of all those achievements of modernism you praise would have been possible. Behind every project of modern civilisation there is a banker and it’s most likely the banker is a Jew. Without the banker, you can take all the best laid out plans of the architects, designers, engineers, etc. and throw them on the rubbish heap. I’m not passing a value judgement on all this, just pointing out the reality of the modern world.

    1)Ashkenazi Jews are the most accomplished ethnic group.

    2) Before 1960, Jews were never dominant in Anglosphere finance except the 1810s-60s Rothschild era in Britain.

    • Agree: littlereddot
  180. @Commentator Mike

    ‘Some’ are insane. Austfailia, poor of soil and parched of water, can barely support the current twenty odd million. When the next drought hits, probably longer and hotter than those recorded before, there will be real problems with food production. Your nightmare scenario will never occur.

  181. @Vox Australis

    Quadrant, in my opinion, is just about the foulest racist sewer in Austfailia, even outdoing Skynews. Just reading Rubenstein’s Wikipedia bio gives you the measure of the creature. ‘Academic’ boong-bashing has long been quite the rage in Austfailia. Ironically, given Rubenstein’s heritage and obsession with the Nazi Judeocide, it is, at least to my mind, very reminiscent of Nazi dehumanisation of the Jews. Irony does not really do it justice.

  182. @Wizard of Oz

    Wizz-always surprising, on the downside! A true believer in ‘breeding the boong out’ of individuals. So VERY reminiscent of the late 19th early 20th century genocide by forced ‘assimilation’ mindset. You’re not John Howard are you? We just gotta keep taking those kids away, eh Johnny.

  183. @Suncoastcraig

    ‘When you drain the barrel you always find a rotten Jew at the bottom. Just like the anti-apartheid movement in South Africa.’

    Do you have any data or names for Jewish involvement in the anti-Apartheid movement in South Africa?

    I’m sure it was disproportionate — but how disproportionate?

  184. @Dream

    Before 1960, Jews were never dominant in Anglosphere finance except the 1810s-60s Rothschild era in Britain.

    That’s where and when most of the industrialisation that created the basis of the modern world and imperialism took place.

    How did the Jews lose their dominance in Anglosphere finance after that period only to recover it in 1960, and how were they able to dominate it again? What were the main factors responsible for this? I am not aware of any major struggles between Jew and gentile financiers for domination of the markets and banking in those periods. Has that history been written?

    • Replies: @Dream
    , @Dream
  185. @Malla

    Are you smoking something?

    Actually, I was smoking cow-dung cigarettes. Wow! HOLY SHIT! ;-D

    • Replies: @littlereddot
    , @Malla
  186. @mulga mumblebrain

    I used to belong to an excellent electronic discussion group which, while it existed did not adequately deal with I mean factually not morally) with some of the crudities of scholars like Philiipe Rushton whose work was featured by Jared Taylor in a recent article. He wasn’t entirely wrong in drawing attention to the possible biological differences between the genetically enormously varied people’s of Africa and the bottle necked constrained ariety outside Africa. He lost me when he insisted on taking seriously average IQ scores of 63 for Australian Aborigines and Khoi San for that matter. But now I have discovered something for myself which was never adequately explored despite the fact that the reliably balanced and fact based moderator whom you will have read on UR could produce a definition of race so sensible that it puts your pious [human race] formulation and that of the “race is a social construct” to shame. That is that a race is an extended family which breeds only or largely with family members for many generations. Cp.dog breeds. I’m happy to be related to a lot of mongrels whose genetic inheritances are amazing but that doesn’t prevent their not distant ancestors being members of distinguishable races with the various typical or average cognitive,athletic or health differences. And it foesn’t mean that all members of your own or any other ethnicity by descent is going to be correctly assessed as a likely equal contributor to whatever you value for mankind because they are human whatever education is offered them. So, back to what neither you nor the admirable moderator, let alone Phioppe Rushton, seem to have considered. As you would know caste in India is associated with bery smart people amid a low IQ population in marked contrast to China. Consider then the implications of caste being universal over much of Africa (as was slavery in various forms). Think of Kwasi Karteng’s academic record and the Yoruba and Igbo performances in UK GCSE. Think of Puskin’s ancestor Gannibal for that matter.

    *** ***
    And now, while I have your attention, consider this

    Pfizer gears up to make Covid drug Paxlovid in China – https://on.ft.com/3Xm11DQ via @FT

    If the CCP government interests President Xi is as good as you insist and so is iveermectin and maybe hyperchlouquine for treating Covid 19 tell us how China made good use of those latter facts.

    • Replies: @mulga mumblebrain
  187. Dream says:
    @Commentator Mike

    The Rothschilds were the most powerful private/merchant bankers in Britain from 1810s(or maybe 20s) to 60s.

    Before the Rothschilds, the most powerful merchant bankers in Britain were the non-Jewish Barings. From Wikipedia:

    Then, in 1802, Barings and Hope & Co. were called on to facilitate the largest land purchase in history: the Louisiana Purchase, which doubled the size of the United States.[9][11] It is regarded as “one of the most historically significant trades of all time”.[9] This was accomplished even though Britain was at war with France and the sale helped to finance Napoleon’s war effort. Technically, the United States purchased Louisiana from Barings and Hope, not from Napoleon.[12]
    ….
    Barings helped to finance the United States government during the War of 1812.[16] By 1818, Barings was called “the sixth great European power”, after England, France, Prussia, Austria and Russia.[9] A fall-off in business and some poor leadership in 1820s caused Barings to cede its dominance in the City of London to the rival firm of N M Rothschild & Sons. Barings remained a powerful firm, however, and in the 1830s the leadership of new American partner Joshua Bates, together with Thomas Baring (1799–1873), son of Sir Thomas Baring, 2nd Baronet, began a turnaround. Bates advocated a shift in Barings’ efforts from Europe to the Americas, believing that greater opportunity lay in the West. In 1832, a Barings office was established in Liverpool specifically to capitalise on new North American opportunities. In 1843, Barings became an exclusive agent to the US government.[17]

  188. Dream says:
    @Commentator Mike

    That’s where and when most of the industrialisation that created the basis of the modern world and imperialism took place.

    Industrialisation and colonialism began way before that period. Britain was already the leading commercial nation in the mid-18th century due to the Industrial Revolution.

  189. @Dream

    Actually these are extremely interesting points.

    Sure, there are certainly good ones, and bad ones. But any unbiased observer must agree that the Ashkenazi have punch far above their weight.

    But the Jews are not a new phenomenon, they have been in meaningful contact with Europe, Asia and Africa for over 2000 years.
    And even if one takes on board the claim that the Ashkenazi are actually Khazars, then the contact is still about 1500 years.

    So then the natural questions are:

    1. Why is it that it is only in the 1960s that they have become so pre-eminent in the West, and not the preceding 1500 years? Is it because of some super power that they attained only in the 60s? Or is it because the West became so degenerate that they were able to take over so completely?

    2. Why did they become so dominant in the West, but much less so in the rest of the world? Was there something in Western culture that allowed itself to be dominated by Jews? Or is it something uniquely useful in Western culture that the Jews wanted to harness?

  190. @Deep Thought

    Don’t forget to pair it with a bottle of “ever so delicate” cow piss, with hint of mango after taste.

    Have you ever gone have a look in your local Indian shop? They really do sell bottles of the stuff. Apparently cows are fed mango leaves so that they produce an especially effective liquid emission.

    Is it true Malla? Does it really work wonders for your health?

    • Replies: @Deep Thought
    , @Malla
  191. @littlereddot

    Or is it something uniquely useful in Western culture that the Jews wanted to harness?

    That’s what I have always believe too– it is symbiotic relationship.

    More likely, “there is something uniquely useful– in the Jews– to the white West that the Westerners want to harness”!

    • Replies: @littlereddot
  192. @littlereddot

    No. I have never tried that but I like genuine Indian curry (cooked by Indians) very much. No curry cooked by non-Indian comes close to it.

    Thanks, my Indian friends.

  193. @Deep Thought

    No. I have never tried that but I like genuine Indian curry (cooked by Indians) very much. No curry cooked by non-Indian comes close to it.

    My sentiments exactly!
    I could never bring myself to eat Japanese curry, although it is very popular where I am from.

  194. @Deep Thought

    That’s what I have always believe too– it is symbiotic relationship.

    To me, it is like a two gangsters who terrorise a town. The brains is the Jewish guy, and the brawn is the White/Anglo guy.

    While they are taking in lots of loot from the frightened townsfolk, they are both happy and best buddies.

    But lately the White gangster has realised that the Jewish guy has been cheating him out of his share of the loot, and is now really pissed.

    He is so pissed that he starts complaining about his partner to the townsfolk about what a victim he is, and how horribly he has been treated by his Jew partner.

    • Agree: Deep Thought
  195. Dream says:
    @littlereddot

    1)Ashkenazi Jews were more economically dominant in pre-1939 Poland, Russia, Austria, Hungary than they are in current day America.

    2)Mizrahi and Sephardic Jews were also very economically powerful in West Asia and North Africa. With British colonisation, Baghdadi Jews like Sassoons, Kadoories and Ezras became influential all over Asia. From Wikipedia:

    Sassoon ben Salih (1750–1830) and his family were the chief treasurers to the pashas of Baghdad and Southern Iraq. His sons David (1792–1864) and Joseph Sassoon (1795–1872) fled from a new and unfriendly wāli. In 1828 David first went to the Persian Gulf port of Bushehr and in 1832 to Bombay, India, with his large family. In Bombay, he built the international business called David S. Sassoon, with the policy of staffing it with people brought from Baghdad. They filled the functions of the various branches of his business in India, Burma, Malaya, and east Asia. He cemented the family’s dominant position in the Sino-Indian opium trade.

    • Replies: @littlereddot
  196. @Dream

    the difference between now and then is that they have stepped out of the shadows, and into the limelight.

  197. Malla says:
    @Deep Thought

    Actually, I was smoking cow-dung cigarettes.

    So, when lesson do we learn here? Hmmm? Avoid smoking shit cigarettes, smelling jenkem or eating human placenta dimsums, before coming on Unz and ranting nonsense. Remember. MmmOK.

  198. Malla says:
    @showmethereal

    They were able to subjugate all of India while only getting ports in China. Hence India is “safe” and China is “dangerous”. W

    That is actually a dumb theory. I think India being a democracy helps. Also India has built up a great image in the West as the land of Gandhi (non-violence), Yoga. Also the image of ancient mysterious ancient land from the colonial periods and of mysterious holy men (lefty hippy movement days).
    Even President Nixon was pissed that Americans on average had a much more positive opinion of India rather than Pakistan. I guess most Westerners looked as Pakistan as some Islamic terrorist weirdo country. China being run by a Communist party makes people uneasy, it is looked as authoritarian (unlike democratic India), as fascist (Xitler) by many people in the West.

  199. Malla says:
    @littlereddot

    Is it true Malla? Does it really work wonders for your health?

    Nah!! It is just placebo, it is a marketing gimmick but we have always known that. Cow pee and shit are useless and make no difference. Human excreta on the other hand… that works wonders. But for that you have to go to the Chinese. They have been using it for a long time.

    https://cmjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13020-019-0253-x
    Fecal medicines used in traditional medical system of China: a systematic review of their names, original species, traditional uses, and modern investigations
    Huan Du, Ting-ting Kuang, Shuang Qiu, Tong Xu, Chen-Lei Gang Huan, Gang Fan et.al

    In China, the medical use of fecal matter (fresh fecal suspension or dry feces) can be dated back to the fourth century, approximately 1700 years ago.
    Among medicinal forms used, dry feces is the most frequently used (66.67%), followed by processed feces (29.63%) and fresh fecal juice (3.70%). In addition, we found that these 54 fecal medicines are mainly used to treat gastrointestinal (37.04%), nervous system (22.22%), skin (22.22%), ophthalmic (18.52%), and gynecological diseases (16.67%).

    Have loads of it, my friend, share it with Deep Thought. He must be used to it as most of what he writes is shit anyways. You may not, but he will surely relish the stuff. My advice, give him the whole lot.
    May Deep Thought live a long and healthy life by consuming loads of that shit instead of smearing shit on this website. Amen.

    • Replies: @littlereddot
  200. raga10 says:

    Human excreta on the other hand… that works wonders.

    Well, fecal transplants are a thing in western medicine too. Not a panacea for all illness perhaps, but it is something that exists and is effective in certain narrow range of issues. And maggots turn out to be the best thing there is when it comes to cleaning necrotic tissue, healing pressure wounds that got completely out of hand (search ‘maggot therapy pressure wounds’ for some lovely pictures).

    As for cow piss I don’t know much about it, but human piss (preferably one’s own, but hey – whatever floats your boat) is certainly great for your skin. I believe Indians knew that for a long time, but it is known to European folk medicine as well.

    • Agree: Deep Thought
    • Replies: @Deep Thought
  201. @mulga mumblebrain

    Canyon think od a scenario in which Australia’s population is reduced too 20 million which is not extremely painful? I suspect that you are neglecting to take account of Australia’s vast size across many different areas of climatic influence and what we can learn about adaptation, not least from Isyaelis on water desalination.

    • Replies: @mulga mumblebrain
  202. @Wizard of Oz

    We can teach the Israelis a thing or two about oppressing the untermenschen, too, and they us. I am simply quoting those who have studied these problems for decades. They don’t deal in airy-fairy wishful thinking, driven by capitalist neoplasticity. The cancer consumes its host, which then dies. We’ll get back to twenty million, one way or another, but Indonesians fleeing their country’s increasing uninhabitability will quickly increase that, briefly. If we’re lucky they may let us keep Tasmania, or move to New Zealand.

  203. @Wizard of Oz

    I don’t know if China has used IVM and HCQ, but they did use chloroquine with SARS back twenty years ago. Getting anything but hatred and lies re. China is impossible in the Western MSM. I’m sure the Brahmins fancy themselves high IQ. Their habitual arrogance is certainly exceptional. Your musings re. ‘race’ seem sensible to me.

    • Thanks: Wizard of Oz
  204. @Deep Thought

    Curry dishes from the Caribbean are different than the direct from India curry dishes. As is the case with most diaspora- they adopt some local things. Different – but they are still good. You can try…. Jamaica – Trinidad – Guayana have different ones from the Indian diaspora melded over 100 years

    • Thanks: Deep Thought
  205. @littlereddot

    it is worth considering a few points all related to the importance of America opening up possibilities for a large number of immigrant Jews. One is that support for Israel eventually became, over decades of gathering steam from WW1 to 1967 and on, dominant in Jewish influence on American policy,. Another is that Ashkenazi brains which first produced Nebel Prize winning STEM moved up the social scale to the heights of Wall Street and the law. Also academe.

    • Thanks: littlereddot
  206. @Malla

    The comment I replied to was by a person stating Indians are acceptable in Australia more than Chinese because they speak English and love cricket. Two things that exist only because India was a British colony for over a century.

    Look at Vietnam. They adore Vietnam now which is still run by a communist government for no other reason than they hope they can use them against China. If Vietnam was bigger – say the size and population of Indonesia with no issues with China – then they would paint Vietnam as North Korea. It’s all nonsense.

    Hong Kong are Chinese people and were never a democracy. But they were subjugated unlike the rest of China. Same for the ROC in Taiwan until the 1980’s. They bowed to the west after the lost the civil war. That’s the only reason they were no longer “dirty chinks” as they were in previous decades BEFORE communism even existed in China. Democracy has nothing to do with it. It’s all about whether you are willing to bow to the west or not. Again – see Japan in the 1980’s

    • Replies: @Malla
  207. @littlereddot

    If you are interested in how Jews came to dominate the USA, I recommend that you read Kevin MacDonald’s trilogy A People That Shall Dwell Alone, Separation and its Discontents, and The Culture of Critique.

    • Thanks: littlereddot
  208. @raga10

    but human piss (preferably one’s own, but hey – whatever floats your boat) is certainly great for your skin.

    Didn’t the soldiers of WWI use their own piss to fight chlorine gas?

  209. @Malla

    …that Americans on average had a much more positive opinion of India

    That is very important to the Uncle Toms. That’s what defines them!

    • LOL: showmethereal
    • Replies: @Malla
  210. @Malla

    My, such deep knowledge of human faeces.

    You are not secretly into coprophilia are you?

    • Replies: @Malla
  211. JM says:
    @littlereddot

    You, for lack of any intelligent response, raise a non sequitur.

    Of course there are other values.

    Now read what I said.

    • Replies: @littlereddot
  212. JM says:
    @Curmudgeon

    Your paucity of materialist understanding is again showing. Only a historical illiterate would vainly try to disentangle the real development of humanity from an approved and laudable component of it.

    You too should read what I said and try to respond to it.

  213. JM says:
    @mulga mumblebrain

    What a loud mouthed, ill educated moron, you are.

    Australia exports 65% of its agricultural production you half-wit.

    • Replies: @mulga mumblebrain
  214. Malla says:
    @littlereddot

    You are not secretly into coprophilia are you?

    No, I am not.

  215. Malla says:
    @showmethereal

    Two things that exist only because India was a British colony for over a century.

    Nope, exists in Pakistan, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka….

    They adore Vietnam now which is still run by a communist government for no other reason than they hope they can use them against China.

    That may be true, but Vietnam itself is getting closer to the West.

    That’s the only reason they were no longer “dirty chinks” as they were in previous decades BEFORE communism even existed in China.

    I do not think that is correct, or it explains everything just my opinion but I could see a patriotic mainlander think that way.

    Democracy has nothing to do with it.

    Democracy is a factor.
    Bow to the West? I don’t think India bows to the West, neither does Vietnam.
    It is an old Chinese trick, if someone follows a course no liked by China, accuse them of being sepoys of the West. Interestingly Indians accuse and try to shame countries like Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, Nepal etc..fro being sepoys of China if they try to get closer to China. Mind games people play.

    • Replies: @showmethereal
  216. Malla says:
    @Deep Thought

    That is very important to the Uncle Toms.

    Uncle Tom? Oh the country who jumped on America’s lap and then backstabbed the USSR, the same USSR which helped create the country. That is some top level Uncle Tommery. Now the country wants to be loved by the West, as it is so developed now, but recently as it’s popularity has fallen in the West, have cone psycho trying to explain this phenomenon in their own wierd ways. Tru Uncel Tom, par excellence—PR China.

    • Replies: @Deep Thought
    , @Dream
  217. @JM

    Monetary value was the only value you deemed important enough to raise.

    When pointed out that that monetary value is NOT the only value of is important to a people, you try to obfuscate instead, and call my response non sequitur.

    I am not sure if you refuse to see my rationale, or lack the intelligence to understand it.

    Go on, your next response will give me a better clue.

    • Replies: @JM
  218. @Malla

    Oh the country who jumped on America’s lap and then backstabbed the USSR, the same USSR which helped create the country.

    Both Russia and the USSR had been “back-stabbing” China for centuries and you pretend not to notice! Even Putin himself tried to jump into bed with the West at the beginning of this century, until he was repeatedly spurned and then turned to China for support.

    India might not be a sepoy of the white West but YOU certainly are– to the degree that you take up the role of a race traitor when it comes to dealing with the whites.

    Now the country wants to be loved by the West, as it is so developed now, but recently as it’s popularity has fallen in the West,

    China not only “wants to be loved by the West” but by almost all other countries too and THAT include India. Like the white West who believe they should only accept a subservient China, India tried to achieve the same with its “Forward Policy”:

    {We unilaterally drew borders that even the British, a more powerful nation, took care not to. Having drawn them, we transgressed them with bravado not matched with military and political capability, paying a heavy price not only in lives but also in morale and national shame for an adventure that could have been avoided and settled on the table.

    Even if negotiations failed and we did not unilaterally take aggressive steps, the matter could even today have been as it was in 1959. To effect a border settlement would mean to admit the tacit error of Nehru and exorcising the belief that we were innocent victims in 1962 and that the Chinese cannot be trusted.

    We need to educate our people that it was our fault, be transparent, not withhold facts and build up a consensus. Those who swear of “not letting go even an inch of territory” should be given guns and sent to the border.

    The country is being held hostage to the ego and the Himalayan blunders of one man, long dead, and probably the worst first CEO of any major country. Only one major gain: Mao-Tse Tung, whose dictum, “never start a war that you cannot win”, which Nehru learnt the hard way, was primarily responsible for galvanising the Indian army.}

    https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/opinion/et-commentary/chinese-checkers-on-border-board-will-india-make-the-winning-move/articleshow/13939408.cms

    Let us see how far the white West can achieve today.

    • Agree: showmethereal
    • Replies: @Malla
  219. JM says:
    @littlereddot

    You need help. Start by requesting a responsible adult lead you about.

    The point I made was entirely valid and one you are incapable of comprehending: the monetary values are what is sought by the Aboriginal Industry and these were created by a different people who were vectors of a more advanced and superior economic order, one they were totally incapable of creating.

    You have no “rationale” except the denial of that basic fact.

  220. @JM

    Aboriginal Industry

    And again you reduce everything down to dollars and cents, and project that same narrow focus on materialism on the aborigines.

    Earlier, you admitted that there are other values involved, and I had hoped there was some glimmer of honesty. Apparently I was wrong.

    No wonder your countries are being wrecked by the Jews….All they need to do is wave a few dollars in your faces, and you become their slaves.

  221. JM says:

    Lest readers foreign to Australia have any confusion about the issues raised in Brenton Sanderson’s article and the disparate array of responses in the Comments column, I strongly recommend this account of the problem presented by an intelligent group of Australians, including aborigines. The “Libertarian” site, though mixed in its output, is to be congratulated for allowing these voices to be heard.

  222. Dream says:
    @Malla

    Off topic question.

    How indigenous do you think is India’s space program? Do they use Russian/Soviet technology or is it completely “make in India”?

    • Replies: @Malla
  223. Malla says:
    @Deep Thought

    Oh everything China does is justified.

    Both Russia and the USSR had been “back-stabbing” China for centuries and you pretend not to notice!

    China has been acting lik a an asshole against India, if you have not noticed.

    {We unilaterally drew borders that even the British, a more powerful nation, took care not to. Having drawn them, we transgressed them with bravado not matched with military and political capability, paying a heavy price not only in lives but also in morale and national shame for an adventure that could have been avoided and settled on the table.

    Bullshit of a race traitor and a national traitor who speaks lies in the pay of a foreign imperialist hostile government. You accuse me of being a race traitor yet you write the words of a race/ national traitor to India. This person will rightfully be shamed by the Indian nationalist population for being a whore of an enemy imperialist country.
    Do you have any brains? You accuse someone for being a “race traitor” but yet you qoute the words of another traitor? Get this in your head, anybody who supports China is considered a traitor whore by the Indian masses. And this will always be the ase in the future now. The kind of tricks you play can be used against your supporters. Booo Hoo, did not think of that.

    • Replies: @Deep Thought
  224. Malla says:
    @Dream

    How indigenous do you think is India’s space program? Do they use Russian/Soviet technology or is it completely “make in India”?

    I do not know the details but I would be very surprised if most of it was “made in India”. Most of it is foreign technology, if you ask me. But we Indians like to show it as “made in India” for ego and pride.

  225. JM says:
    @raga10

    Australia is British territory pioneered and developed by people overwhelmingly of British stock. It was conquered. In so doing, a system of justice was set up which is being abused by subversives.

  226. @Malla

    1) what are you talking about? Pakistan and Bangladesh and Sri Lanka were under the British… The average westerner cannot tell any of them apart… You think in Australia they can??? and the reason they aren’t feted in the west is because they get along with China. Read the comments section from this western news and see how westerners really talk about you when you aren’t listening…

    https://www.yahoo.com/news/india-pass-china-as-the-worlds-most-populous-country-billion-215138449.html

    2) opinion and fact are not the same. Chiang Kai Shek had to tell the US there is no way he could rally the ROC to believe the US was behind them in their fight against the communists when Chinese people knew the Chinese Exclusion Act existed before there was even a communist party. People are not dumb. That was the only reason the US removed it from its books… Australia used to discriminate against Chinese too —- long before the CPC existed. As to today… Australia does what the US does.

    3) no Vietnam is not getting closer to the west. Vietnam is firmly neutral. Vietnam refuses the west’s overtures to go against China and stop doing business with Russia. It refuses to go along with the US in the SCS because they know the US doesn’t care about Vietnam but only wants to encircle China. Especially since Vietnam has the same claims as China. Vietnam is not dumb. In fact Vietnam receives Chinese investment to circumvent US tariffs. No no… Vietnam looks out for Vietnam and won’t endanger itself on behalf of the west.

    You think Vietnam will sign troop agreements with Australia like Japan did (and just did with the UK too)?

    • Replies: @Malla
    , @Malla
  227. @Malla

    Oh everything China does is justified.

    You: everything the whites does is justified.

    China has been acting lik a an asshole against India, if you have not noticed.

    Thief calling “thief.” It is India that has been acting like an asshole against China. I remember that in an earlier post of yours, you said you would not take the Indian side of the story on an dispute along the common border.

    Bullshit of a race traitor and a national traitor who speaks lies in the pay of a foreign imperialist hostile government. You accuse me of being a race traitor yet you write the words of a race/ national traitor to India. This person will rightfully be shamed by the Indian nationalist population for being a whore of an enemy imperialist country.

    EXACTLY!!!

    “This person will rightfully be shamed by the Indian nationalist population for being a whore of an enemy imperialist country” that is China! And YOU “will rightfully be shamed by the Indian nationalist population for being a whore of an enemy imperialist country” that is the once-Great Britain!

    You are merely proving my point!!!

    • Agree: showmethereal
    • Replies: @Malla
  228. Malla says:
    @Deep Thought

    You: everything the whites does is justified.

    Nope.

    Thief calling “thief.”

    That is exactly what you are doing.

    It is India that has been acting like an asshole against China.

    Not according to Indian Nationalists and Indian people in general.

    You are merely proving my point!!!

    No, you are proving my point. I agree that my views about the British empire is extremely unpopular among Indian Nats but remember all those who take China’s point of view also face the same fate. Both are in the same package, you cannot have one but not the other. LOL.

    • Replies: @Deep Thought
  229. Malla says:
    @showmethereal

    how westerners really talk about you when you aren’t listening…

    One should expose what Indians talk about Westerners when nobody is listening or what Arabs talk about Indians when nobody is listening or what Indians talk about Chinese when nobody is listening or what Chinese talk about Indians when nobody is listening and so on and so on……

    Chinese Exclusion Act

    The USA had the right to decide who it gives citizenship to and who it allows in their country. Chinese or Indians did not have a god given right to go and settle in the USA or Australia. Similarly the PRC has the right to regulate who comes in their country, who can work and so does the Republic of India. Both China and India rarely give citizenships to foreigners.
    Chinese labourers were ready to work for cheap compared to White labourers because the lifestyle of the Chinese in that period was more simple. Also, many of them had their families in China and would send money back to China. Cost of living in China during that period was cheaper than that in the USA/ Australia where an American or Australian worker had to support his family in a more expensive environment. This was definitely unfair to the American or Australian workers. It were the rich capitalists who wanted more Chinese labour while the worker’s labour unions wanted a restriction on Chinese labour. besides there had been a spate of attacks on Americans in China, White people would be stoned in the streets of China by Chinese children calling them “White Devils”. So the Chinese side was not exactly innocent.

    no Vietnam is not getting closer to the west.

    Vietnam is trying to be neutral but is till getting closer to the West and QUAD.

    Vietnam refuses the west’s overtures to go against China and stop doing business with Russia.

    Business with Russia? Same with India, and yet in your books “India is a sepoy of the West”.

    It refuses to go along with the US in the SCS because they know the US doesn’t care about Vietnam but only wants to encircle China.

    You are playing it around, many of China’s neighbours out of concern of China (justified or unjustified) are voluntarily and slowly getting closer to the West. That includes India and many other countries in the far Eastern region.

    The coming together of India, Japan, Vietnam and Australia and maybe (and very likely) in the future the Philippines and Indonesia into an alliance is a natural process with or without the USA’s involvement. If Mongolia would not have been land locked, once could count them in too.
    Now I can understand if you say that such “concern” of China is unfounded, that may be true. But, that is what is happening. For example, Japan partly financed Vietnam’s purchase of Russian submarines and India is training the Vietnamese navy-men in it’s own submarine training facilities as India has one such facility as well as a history of operating Russian submarines. Vietnam has an intelligence sharing tie up with Australia. Philippines is buying the Brahmos anti-ship missiles from India and so may Vietnam. Indian foreign services RAW and Japanese foreign service Naicho have several intelligence sharing agreements just like how Vietnam has with Australia. The Indian, Australian, American and Japanese navies have frequent naval exercises.
    In your eyes, it may be that the USA is trying to encircle China, and that maybe. I am ready to accept that but there is also another parallel phenomenon, many nations in the Indo-Pacific region are slowly building an alliance with each other out of concern of China.

    • Agree: Commentator Mike
    • Replies: @showmethereal
  230. Malla says:
    @showmethereal

    Pakistan and Bangladesh and Sri Lanka were under the British… The average westerner cannot tell any of them apart…

    stating Indians are acceptable in Australia more than Chinese because they speak English and love cricket.

    My point is that, what is very unlikely to be the case. I am not convinced that Australians prefer Indians to the Chinese. Some do , some prefer the Chinese to the Indians, some prefer both, some neither Indians or Chinese, and many Australians don’t think about these things. As far as cricket, even thought cricket is popular in Australia and Australia is a super power in the cricketing world with an extremely talented team, whose cricket players have hardcore fans among even slum kids from Pakistan to Sri Lanka, cricket is still not the number one sport in Australia.
    Australian style football and rugby are more like it, and India is nothing much in rugby. The Fijians or the Samoans, the Tongas are some non White teams who are much more in Rugby than us Indians and on that ground, more likely to be popular among Australians.
    As I said, I am not sure Australian people prefer Indians to Chinese. I doubt that is the case but if that is true for some people, it maybe because on average, Indians have more of the gift of gab than the Chinese. Indians on average are more talkative and I think this is a bigger factor than the British Empire or cricket.

    • Agree: Commentator Mike
    • Replies: @sb
  231. @Malla

    That is exactly what you are doing.

    Thief calling “thief” again.

    Not according to Indian Nationalists and Indian people in general.

    Ditto from the Chinese side.

    No, you are proving my point. I agree that my views about the British empire is extremely unpopular among Indian Nats but remember all those who take China’s point of view also face the same fate. Both are in the same package, you cannot have one but not the other. LOL.

    You are the one who try to “have one but not the other!”

    • Replies: @Malla
  232. Malla says:
    @Deep Thought

    Thief calling “thief” again.

    Thief calling “thief” again.

    Ditto from the Chinese side.

    Cool, Indian Nationalists vs Chinese Nationalists on this issue, till the end of time.

    You are the one who try to “have one but not the other!”

    Nope, you are.

  233. sb says:
    @Malla

    I’m not sure Australians prefer Indians to Chinese either
    My eyes tell me that ethnic Chinese much more readily mix with Australian Anglos socially and that second and third generation ethnic Chinese often intermarry with White Australians as the norm
    Indians -I’m talking about non Christian South Asians here- generally marry within their own communities (and are much more money and so-called status focused )

    I’d say that Chinese want to become Western more

    As for the cricket thing- many Australians are pissed off with people with Australian passports in their back pocket cheering on the team playing Australia

    • Replies: @Malla
  234. @Malla

    No – Vietnam is NOT India. India joining the Quad is not neutral. Quad is not neutral like the SCO is. Vietnam said outright they will NOT join in such. As to Vietnam’s purchase of Russian submarines. So what???? Russia sold China twice the amount of the same subs. It’s kind of like your Indian press pointing to Russia selling India the S-400 but you all don’t realize Russia sold it to China before you – and for less money. Again – why would China care if Vietnam buys Brahmos??? it might shock you – but China’s anti ship missiles are more advanced. Brahmos did not get Russia’s most sophisticated tech.

    And while you are at it – why don’t you tell the Indian government to stay out of Bhutan’s business. And it is only in your imagination that other nations in the region are entering into an alliance out of concern for China. It’s really only your Indians joining with the west. It is you in India trying to keep hold of Bhutan and Sri Lanka and Maldives and Bangladesh and Nepal because they ALL want better relations with China. So you are confused. Nobody in ASEAN is joining the US crusade. Indonesia does military drills with the US…. But it also does naval drills with China. Thailand in general has been pro US – but it buys submarines and other naval ships from China. When you deal with BOTH sides evenly – THAT is what neutrality means. Learn the difference.
    Even the Filipinos who are treaty bound have told the US under 2 consecutive administrations “sorry – if you have a problem with China that’s on you – we aren’t going to get dragged into your fight”. Japan and South Korea are still under US occupation and don’t count. Mongolia??? Are you kidding??? Yeah the same one that just agreed with Russia and China to put a new pipeline through there. Give us a break. So who are these neighbors…? You mean the ones in Central Asia??? You mean the ones that helped start the SCO??? China has an antagonistic relationship with really only 2 countries. India and Japan. South Korea – it depends on if the left or right wing is in power.

    Back to Australia – which this thread is SUPPOSED. yeah Chinese nor Indians had no God given right to migrate to the US nor Australia – and White Europeans NEVER had a God given right to steal those lands from their natives. If they think it was ok to rob natives of land then they should shut up about migrants — or in this case the natives. The fact you can’t understand that is why “Deep Thought” called you what he called you.

    • Replies: @Malla
    , @Malla
  235. Malla says:
    @sb

    My eyes tell me that ethnic Chinese much more readily mix with Australian Anglos socially and that second and third generation ethnic Chinese often intermarry with White Australians as the norm

    EXACTLY. That is what I have seen too. The Chinese readily mix far more with Whites or Anglos whan us Indians. It is just that Chinese nats/nuts (Wumaos-50 cent army) are obsessed with this Anglo-Indo secret alliance against Chinese with Indos being some kind of Anglo wannabe-sepoys or some bullshit like that. Which is bullshit really.
    And then they try to fit multiple issues like the case of Asians in Australia in this false made-up frame. They have a single minded obsession with similar bullshit theories.

    I think that given the option, most White nationalists in the USA or Australia would prefer Chinese migration to Indian migration. They would prefer neither, but given an option, would prefer Chinese/East Asian immigrants to South Asian/ Middle Eastern immigrants.
    But most Aussies or Brits, given an option in between Hindu/Sikh migration or Muslim migration would prefer Hindu-Sikhs over Muslims. But would really prefer neither Hindu-Sikhs nor Muslim migration, option.

  236. Malla says:
    @showmethereal

    Vietnam is NOT India.

    Vietnam is not India, but there have been a lot of similarities in general foreign policy. Both India and Vietnam have been staunchly pro Soviet but anti-Chinese and anti-West in the past. Recently both are pro Russian but at the same time improving relations with the West. Both have issues with China though I agree there are more pro China Vietnamese than pro China Indians as percentage of population.
    Vietnam has been more neutral but Vietnam (along with New Zealand and South Korea) did take part in QUAD +, QUAD plus. BTW, the QUAD is not a military alliance like NATO. India has till now refused to join any such alliance. Most of Indian military hardware is Russian and there is the issue of interoperability of weapon’s system with American allys. At the same time, India is under a double responsibility of not having Russian technology leak to the West or Western technology to Russia or it will lose trust to both.

    Again – why would China care if Vietnam buys Brahmos??? it might shock you – but China’s anti ship missiles

    I am not shocked if P.R. China has superior anti-ship systems than the Brahmos. You are as usual misunderstanding my gist. Vietnam are thinking of buying those missiles not because it feels it faces a threat from the USA or Japan or Thailand or France or Cambodia or the Philippines or Australia or South Korea or New Zealand or Indonesia. Those Brahmos missiles would be directed at the Navy of a one country and the ones I have listed earlier, that one country is not in it.

    Filipinos who are treaty bound have told the US under 2 consecutive administrations “sorry – if you have a problem with China that’s on you – we aren’t going to get dragged into your fight”.

    Yes, the Filipinos wish to be neutral and that is a wise policy. They are afraid that some Sino-American war may take place on the Philippines just like the Japanese-Allied war of WW2.

    Nobody in ASEAN is joining the US crusade. Indonesia does military drills with the US…. But it also does naval drills with China.

    Not overtly. But recently they are slowly sliding in one direction. As far as military drills, India and China to Take Part in Joint Military Drills with Russia.
    https://www.voanews.com/a/india-and-china-to-take-part-in-joint-military-drills-with-russia/6723800.html
    So?

    that helped start the SCO???

    India is a member of the SCO too, so?

    If they think it was ok to rob natives of land then they should shut up about migrants

    That is one of the dumbest arguments in the World. Bangladeshis steal land from Chittging Hill tract Buddhist natives by actively sending settlers in this day and age, to demographically overwhelm the natives. Yet if millions of Africans were to migrate to Bangladesh, there would be riots on the streets. Every population has stolen land from somebody, most of Africa was stolen by bantus from Khoi San and Pygmies. Arabs went and settled en masse in North Africa. Central Asia was once full of Nordic White people. Your argument is illogical.

  237. @JM

    ‘Aboriginal Industry’ is a favourite expression of the most depraved blackfella hating scum in Australia, starting with the Murdoch cancer, Ground Zero for Evil in the country.

  238. @JM

    In a good year, cretin. Good years are vanishing, fast. Have you noticed the prices of foodstuffs lately, or do you simply raid the cat-litter tray?

  239. Malla says:
    @showmethereal

    why don’t you tell the Indian government to stay out of Bhutan’s business. And it is only in your imagination that other nations in the region are entering into an alliance out of concern for China. It’s really only your Indians joining with the west. It is you in India trying to keep hold of Bhutan and Sri Lanka and Maldives and Bangladesh and Nepal because they ALL want better relations with China.

    Good that you brought this up. In my opinion, Bhutan and the other South Asian (SAARC) countries have the sovereign right to have cl;ose ties with whoever it wants, India hs no right to interfere. But as I have said, the Indian nats/nuts are not that different from Chinese nats/nuts. Just like the Chinese like to use the “sepoy of the West” trick or get mighty concerned if its neighbours get closer to the West, the same is the situation with India. Indians call these countries of South Asia (Bhutan, Nepal, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and even Pakistan) as “sepoys of their Chinese massas” and consider it part of a Chinese plot to encircle India.

    • Replies: @showmethereal
  240. @Malla

    I don’t have time to reply to two separate messages so consider it

    Do you honestly believe Vietnam is considering going to war with China and that’s why it want Brahmos? Seriously? The last time there were naval engagements between China and Vietnam were the 70’s (when Vietnam was an US ally and was waiting for help that never came) and then the 80’s. It wasn’t close. Since then BOTH SIDES have tacitly said “ok you have these features and we have these – let’s keep the status quo”. There has been nothing since. Vietnam has had closer scuffles with the other claimants in the region than China and that is a fact!!! A further fact is its other neighbors have seized and destroyed more Vietnamese fishing boats than anyone else. Do you read news from the region or only the western press. The fact continue that Vietnam controls more physical features than anyone else in the SCS. Yes – more than China. So it has the most disputes!!! But you think they want to take on China…???? An additional fact is everyone in the region respected the status quo until the US started sticking its nose in the region because China was expanding its features — just like the other claimants did. All of ASEAN knows it is the US trying to start fires because it is scared of China’s progress. ALL of them have repeatedly said after every conference they do NOT need “outside countries” involved and that they know how to keep the peace within themselves. Even the most Western friendly country in the region – Singapore- does naval drills with China even though it hosts US bases. So which direction can the region possibly be swaying. Maybe in the western mind – but that’s about it. I know you can’t possibly mean via trade… All you have to do is look at the numbers.

    Yes India joined SCO… But my point is the founders were Russia and China. Shanghai Cooperation. The literal point was to establish and keep peace between Russia and China and the Central Asian former Soviet bloc. The other underlying reason was to keep the US out or the region and to keep track of jihadists used by the west to cause havoc. So my guess – again MY GUESS – meaning I’m not claiming this as fact – is that it was Russian friendship why India got in. Again – my guess is that as the expansion was to head to Iran through Pakistan. Again my guess is that Russia did not want India to feel slighted. What IS fact is China would have to agree for India to join. Contrary to the Indian news media’s assertions – China prefers good neighborly relations with India.

    Yes I know about “the string of pearls” idea. Except it’s false. Countries should want good relations with everyone in their region. India is trying to project western mindsets on to China. The US lives thousands of kilometers away. US MIC has one purpose and one purpose only and that is to be able to militarily subjugate all “for their own hood”. Russia and China had much more serious border issues – which had a MUCH longer history – than exists between China and India. The issues should have been solved decades ago just like it has been between Russia and China. The area would flourish. The west does NOT want China and India to solve the border issue just like it didn’t want Russia and China to solve. Well now the west is gnashing their teeth because it wants to be able to control the region.

    It is using Australia in the same way. Australia had zero beef with China and prospered for decades with trading with China. But its fellow five eyes master tells it to go against China and it obeys. To try to remotely compare the two situations is absolute nonsense

    As to stealing land…. Did Bangladesh sail to Guam and take it? Did it sail to Madagascar??? Did it sail to the Falklands? So you don’t get the difference in neighbors fighting and far away bandits???? More to the point did the Bangladeshi people sail and takeover what we call Australia today?? And if Bangladesh robbed others for their land and then complained about the natives – I would tell Bangladeshis the same thing. But you don’t understand Deep Thoughts point so you won’t get mine either. Never mind.

    • Replies: @Malla
  241. @mulga mumblebrain

    Austfailia, poor of soil and parched of water, can barely support the current twenty odd million.

    Large tracts of Australia are greening fast thanks to the higher concentration of the ‘Gas of Life’ (CO2) in the atmosphere.
    Satellite photos show the Simpson desert (and other arid stretches of the outback), receding fast and now hosting more vegetation.

    Australia is right now a net food exporter – by a large margin.

    If and when CO2 levels ever get to more sensible levels like they were in the past (ie: 800 ppm – 1000ppm or more), most of Australia will be like the Amazonian rain forests, producing an abundance of farm output to feed the world.

    The sooner we get to that stage the better. For the sake of future generations, let’s hope that happens soon.

    • Thanks: Commentator Mike
  242. Malla says:
    @showmethereal

    Do you honestly believe Vietnam is considering going to war with China and that’s why it want Brahmos?

    No it does not want to go to war. It is a “just in case” weapon. After all they have faced an invasion quite recently directly from the north. I mean they beat those invaders like a drum last time but still…

    Contrary to the Indian news media’s assertions – China prefers good neighborly relations with India.

    Actually the Indian Government wants (atleast wanted till recently) good relations with China too (to balance the West)

    Yes I know about “the string of pearls” idea. Except it’s false.

    It may or may not be false, but people in India do not trust China. They consider China a sneaky backstabber and a hegemon imperialist (which needs to be taught a good lesson).

    India is trying to project western mindsets on to China.

    This is outright false. This is false Chinese belief, one of those false “sepoys of the West” madness which engulfs the Chinese. India’s mindset about China is pure desi, pure Indian as can be. It reflects India the ancient civilization and India the revolutionary anti-imperialist. It reflects India of the masses.
    Indians look at China as an imperialist hegemon, basically “a West” to the East. So much so that Indians who have traditionally been anti-Western, been suspicious of the West as “evul Imperialists”, now believe that the West is lessor evil compared to the evul Imperialist to the East, China.
    Indian masses:
    “Western barbarian Imperialist dogs less rabid than Eastern barbarian dog. So now great spiritual land Bharata might have to actually temporarily ally with Western Imperialist dogs (but with care, backbiting dog, that is tha West) to give a good and final thrashing to Eastern rabid Imperialist Dog, China. And big Daddy India will give a nice thrashing. alrite. ”

    Zero influence from the West. Non Westernised poor Indians are more anti-China, actually

    Did Bangladesh sail to Guam and take it

    More idiotic logic. For the Chittagong Hill tract people, does it matter if those who colonise their lands came by sea or by land. Makes ZERO difference.

    • Replies: @showmethereal
  243. @Malla

    “After all they have faced an invasion quite recently directly from the north. I mean they beat those invaders like a drum last time but still…”

    As usual you have no clue what you are talking about. Tell us genius when did the war end … How many years later… And who had land returned to them that they couldn’t take themselves until they left Cambodia. You listen to the western press too much. You love to talk about IQ. Well for one thing – just like Russia didn’t want to take over Ukraine – neither did China want to take over Vietnam. It went there to get them out of Cambodia. Instead of fighting a stupid guerilla war like the US did in Vietnamese territory – It drew back to parts of the border it seized. The fighting continued for another dozen years. When Vietnam left Cambodia they were given their land back by China. I guess you have to have a certain IQ to understand what winning and losing looks like.

    Blah to the rest.

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
$
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Brenton Sanderson Comments via RSS
PastClassics
The Surprising Elements of Talmudic Judaism
How America was neoconned into World War IV
Analyzing the History of a Controversial Movement