The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 Timothy Vorgenss Archive
A Pro-White President for France?
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks
Credit Image: © Alexis Sciard/IP3 via ZUMA Press
Credit Image: © Alexis Sciard/IP3 via ZUMA Press

Eric Zemmour will soon be a candidate for the April 2022 French presidential election. He isn’t an official candidate yet but there is no doubt that he will eventually declare. He is one of the most famous journalists in France, and is well known in Switzerland, Belgium, and other French-speaking countries. He has portrayed himself as a truth-teller in a news media dominated by timid, left-leaning journalists.

Mr. Zemmour wrote his first book on politics in 1986, and became a TV commentator in 1995. For 27 years, and despite several changes of TV programs (he has been fired over and over for his political views), he has been constantly in the mainstream media.

His positions are almost all controversial:

  • He criticizes Islam, the Great Replacement, the colonization of France by foreigners, and has referred to non-white “scum.”
  • He recognizes the existence of races (this is unusual in France).
  • He speaks of French politicians of the last 40 years as “traitors.”
  • He believes that Marshal Pétain (head of the Vichy regime under Nazi Germany) saved French Jews in exchange for handing over foreign Jews.
  • He says there is a competition between Ashkenazi and Sephardic Jews over who has been most persecuted and therefore worthier.
  • He is the only European politician who has called the current pope “anti-white.”
  • He argues that racial profiling is normal, and that if blacks are stopped twice as often as whites by the police, it is because they are twice likely to be criminals.

It has been a very long time since so much truth has been spoken in France. In fewer than 150 days, France could have an explicitly pro-white president, far different from Donald Trump. In a very large field of a dozen candidates, he has polled as high as second place, but has lately dropped back to third or perhaps fourth.

Activists from Generation Zemmour (GZ) put up campaign posters. (Credit Image: © Maxppp via ZUMA Press)
Activists from Generation Zemmour (GZ) put up campaign posters. (Credit Image: © Maxppp via ZUMA Press)

Who is Zemmour?

Eric Zemmour was born 64 years ago, in Montreuil just outside Paris, now a lawless area and an Afro-Islamic enclave. You can spend 20 minutes there in the middle of the day without seeing a single white person. Mr. Zemmour has therefore seen the great non-European replacement close up, from its beginnings in 1970.

His parents were Berber Jews from Algeria, who came to France during the Algerian War. He is grateful that because of French colonization, he was saved from having to spend his life in Algeria. Most people would not consider him white, but he once said that his mother had blue eyes and very fair skin. He has light-colored eyes and had curly hair before he went bald, and he has the typical look of someone from the mountains of Algeria. He defines himself above all as a Frenchman by spirit, or a Frenchman “of the branch,” a play on the words since the native French call themselves “French from the roots.”

Religiously, Mr. Zemmour is agnostic, a Jew who does not practice. He admits that he is not very sure what his religious beliefs are. His distant ancestors probably converted to Judaism, so he is therefore not necessarily a Jew in the ethnic sense.

Zemmour against the world

In his early career as a young political journalist, Eric Zemmour saw the submission to the Left of French right-wing politicians, even among those who became his friends and mentors. He, himself, refuses to submit to cultural and ideological dictatorship. He sometimes compares himself to Donald Trump, in that they are both dissident figures hated by the media. Nevertheless, he criticizes Mr. Trump for not reining in the power of big-tech social media companies, and for failing to stop their march towards global censorship. Comparing himself to Mr. Trump underscores his desire to win the presidency as an outsider and by challenging mainstream ideas.

Eric Zemmour (Credit Image: © Alexis Sciard/IP3 via ZUMA Press)
Eric Zemmour (Credit Image: © Alexis Sciard/IP3 via ZUMA Press)

Mr. Zemmour realized early that his pro-French views made him an exception in French politics and journalism. This is a professional environment that is very hostile to his ideas, rejects him, and fights him relentlessly. French television has a morbid and self-defeating fascination with right-wing dissidents. The French media promote them in the vain hope that people will hate them more.

Citizenship

Mr. Zemmour’s background makes him a powerful advocate for assimilation — the idea that others can become French. French-style assimilation is his trademark, and he talks about it in almost every interview. One obsession for which he is famous is his demand that Muslims give their children French first names to prove their willingness to become like the natives. This is parallel to the Muslim demand that converts take a Muslim first name as a sign of their new identity. The general opinion, even on the Right, is that this is excessive and meaningless.

The racialist Right — practically non-existent in France — opposes this form of assimilation. However, Muslims would hate a requirement of this kind, and many would probably leave the country if it were applied. It is therefore a way to create maximum discomfort for our civilizational opponents.

Eric Zemmour fully understands Islamic conquest. A turning point for him was “the Creil headscarf affair” (Creil is a Paris suburbs) in 1989. Three Arab girls defied the rules of their high school by wearing prohibited headscarves. He understood that this was an outer sign of the huge simmering problem of Islamic conquest and that elected officials would back down.

Race

Mr. Zemmour considers himself white. In 2008, on Swiss television, he said to black leftist activist, Rockaya Diallo, “It’s obvious: I belong to the white race and you belong to the black race.” In France, such a statement from a public figure is unimaginable. Any person who made it today would be front-page news for two weeks, and would never live it down. This is because in France, race officially does not exist. Scientists take turns telling us this.

This assertion that he is white reflects his views of assimilation. In France, the Republican paradigm goes hand in hand with French-style universalism, which allows two conceptions of nationality: those who are French by blood and those who are “French by spirit,” who may be considered “French by adoption.” Mr. Zemmour regularly quotes the royalist historian Jacques Bainville, who said, “Better than a race, the French people are a nation.” By this standard he is French, according to the Republican conception. Nevertheless, Mr. Zemmour appears to know that large-scale assimilation is impossible.

Contradictions

In October 2018, Mr. Zemmour made a revealing statement in an interview with a French right-wing online newspaper. The journalist mentioned his demand that North African and black parents give their children European Christian names. She asked him whether this makes the African invasion more acceptable, by hiding it administratively. And does this not therefore make the Great Replacement even more dangerous and inevitable?

Mr. Zemmour replied:

You are right. I defend assimilation. But you are beginning with the next generation. You acknowledge that assimilation will not happen. You take an upcoming confrontation for granted. Therefore, we might as well know “who is who”. In reality . . . you may be right, and you have understood that I agree with you in reality.

Here is a video of his remarks — in French, of cousre, but with English subtitles.

It is not clear whether he is promoting assimilation or remigration — return to countries of origin — because assimilation is impossible. There seem to be two thoughts in his head, as is common in people confronted by a dilemma. He seems to be torn between the assimilation he hopes for, if time allowed, and the separation that is realistic within our current timeframe.

Eric Zemmour on stage with the title of his book behind him. (Credit Image: © Laurent Coust/SOPA Images via ZUMA Press Wire)
Eric Zemmour on stage with the title of his book behind him. (Credit Image: © Laurent Coust/SOPA Images via ZUMA Press Wire)

For all his lucidity, Eric Zemmour is not a racialist. He is an assimilationist, but he must painfully know in his heart that it probably won’t work. It is too late. In small numbers, it might have been possible, but the numbers are now too great.

However, if Mr. Zemmour is elected, there is no doubt that, unlike Donald Trump, he will consistently follow through on all the major points of his program. For a nation that is already deeply leftist, this is a shocking prospect. He would be a vital first step towards the salvation of France.

(Republished from American Renaissance by permission of author or representative)
 
Hide 4 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. American Renaissance, from which this article comes, never mentions heavy Jewish involvement in the Great Replacement and the dispossession of White peoples generally. It has censored commenters who have tried to make these points on their website.
    So it is typical, perhaps, that they are promoting Zemmour. Any clear-sighted observer sees that Zemmour is controlled opposition, designed to take votes away from real French nationalists.

    • Replies: @al gore rhythms
  2. Sam J. says:

    “…A Pro-White President for France?…”

    I don’t believe a damn word he says. He’s Jewish and the odds are extremely, massively, stupendously likely that he is just leading the opposition as Jews always do. He will screech and jabber and maybe even pretend to do something but there will be no change that affects the plan to destroy France.

    The guys a fake Hitler except unlike the real one he will stay paid off.

    How many thousands of years do the Jews have to screw you over before you finally see that there’s no real benefit in having them around you for any reason at all? This is the real essence of the problem. The Jews record in this sort of thing is so unerringly bad that to take a chance on them is like buying one lottery ticket and expecting to win. And even at that it’s not even a regular lottery ticket you are buying. It’s the same type lottery that Epstein’s Zorro Trust bought a ticket and won the lottery in, [and this is true he really did win the lottery].

    https://www.thelostogle.com/2019/08/14/no-jeffrey-epstein-did-not-win-25-million-from-an-oklahoma-lottery-ticket-or-did-he/

    • Replies: @JimDandy
  3. JimDandy says:
    @Sam J.

    Yeah. But does it even matter if the figurehead who gets elected is Jewish or not? The first thing our first Black! president did after winning was put an ex IDF volunteer (the son of a Zionist terrorist founder of Irgun) in charge of his administration. “After serving in the Clinton White House, Emanuel made \$16 million in a little more than two years as an investment banker.”

  4. @Verymuchalive

    The comments in this article attributed to Zemmour go a lot further than any comments made by ‘controlled opposition’/mainstream conservative candidates which I have ever heard. To be controlled opposition I don’t think you’d go any further to the right than you needed to go (which is not very much; the limits of accepted discourse being so tight) because otherwise you are just putting ideas in people’s heads unnecessarily.

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
$
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Timothy Vorgenss Comments via RSS
PastClassics
Analyzing the History of a Controversial Movement
Becker update V1.3.2
The Shaping Event of Our Modern World
The Surprising Elements of Talmudic Judaism
How America was neoconned into World War IV