The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 Andrew Joyce Archive
A Critical Look at the Polish ‘Pogroms’ of 1914–1920
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

“Jewish reports tended toward exaggeration.”
William Hagen, Anti-Jewish Violence in Poland, 1914–1920, 173.

“All the methods of malevolent propaganda are a menace from which Poland is a notable sufferer.”
Major General Edgar Jadwin, U.S. Army, 1920

Anti-Jewish Violence in Poland, 1914–1920
William W. Hagan
Cambridge University Press, 2018

ORDER IT NOW

I recently had the good fortune to read William Hagen’s Cambridge-published Anti-Jewish Violence in Poland, 1914–1920, one of the most interesting books I’ve read on Jewish-European relations since John Doyle Klier’s Oxford-published work on the Tsarist pogroms. It’s always refreshing to see scholars of European heritage tackle this subject matter, which has been dominated for too long by Jewish academics offering a one-sided, lachrymose, and propaganda-laden approach. Now eighty years old, Hagen, like Klier before him, has started publishing his most incisive work on the Jews only in the deep twilight of his career. Also echoing Klier’s work on the pogroms, Hagen’s Anti-Jewish Violence in Poland offers an unflinching look at the causes of inter-ethnic friction, often using novel or previously ignored source material, as well as a balanced and careful approach to the true extent of any violence that occurred. The result is a text that doesn’t just attempt to get to the bottom of what exactly happened, but also why it happened. The following essay is a hybrid work involving a partial review of Hagen’s work and some of my own thoughts and research on the subject.

Context

Hagen’s text offers strong support for Kevin MacDonald’s argument in Separation and Its Discontents that anti-Semitism is a reactive phenomenon very closely related to Jewish dominance in certain spheres of public life, especially the economy. In fact, in Separation and Its Discontents MacDonald cites on several occasions Hagen’s only previous work on anti-Semitism, a 1996 prize-winning article published in the Journal of Modern History.[1]Hagen, William W. “Before the ‘Final Solution’: Toward a Comparative Analysis of Political Anti-Semitism in Interwar Germany and Poland.” The Journal of Modern History 68, no. 2 (1996): 351–81. MacDonald cites this work on pages 53 and 55 of the paperback edition of SAID. The focus on socio-economic factors in both works indicates that Hagen’s understanding of anti-Semitism has been settled for some time.

Hagen’s Anti-Jewish Violence in Poland opens by giving voice to some fascinating Polish contemporaries, opening up an avenue of discussion often closed off in lachrymose Jewish histories which overwhelmingly focus on the putative suffering of the Jews rather than the difficult experiences of those they lived among. One of the more interesting examples is Hagen’s exploration of the works of Jan Słomka, Habsburg Polish mayor of Dzików and author of From Serfdom to Self-Government: Memoirs of a Polish Village Mayor. Słomka’s memoirs offer insight in the origins of Polish antipathy towards the Jews, and depict Jews as “cynical exploiters of Christian villagers’ weaknesses and ignorance.” (11) Mimicking tactics employed under the Russian tavern system, Jewish merchants in Poland often used alcohol to drag peasants into debt and keep them there. Słomka explained how Jews

would begin from harvest-time to buy up provisions from the farmers, mostly paying them with vodka: and these they would sell during the hunger period at huge profit. They would set things out on market days in sacks; and around these sacks would wander a hungry throng … buying grain in pots or quart measures. (13)

Słomka was a teetotaler and castigated his fellow Poles for the reckless drinking and lack of forethought that allowed them to fall into the hands of Jews who were systematically “bankrupting the emancipated peasantry and foreclosing on their minuscule farms.” In his own town of Dzików, Słomka remarked that most of the land had at one time been in Jewish hands and had only been “bought back with a lot of toil.” The Jews, according to Słomka, “have never wanted to till the soil, they have preferred to live by their wits, to profit by trading in the lands peasants have had to pay for [in compensation for receiving post-emancipation freeholds].” For the Jews, of course, it was a very successful strategy. In the 1860s, Słomka looked on as the prestigious houses ringing the central square of his chief market district, Tarnobrzeg, passed into Jewish hands.[2]Hagen (2018), 14.

Hagen places Słomka’s concerns in the context of a wider Polish discourse on a slow national dispossession carried out by Jews. Słomka is a particularly interesting writer because he focuses as much on Polish weaknesses as on Jewish strategic competence. Słomka, for example, was irate that rural Poles had neglected to develop a keen acumen in business that would enable them to at least compete with Jews on an ethnic level rather than simply acting as prone or passive victims of unanswered economic exploitation. Słomka was later full of praise when such an answer did materialize, in the form of cooperatives that emerged in the 1880s. Due in part to increased assistance from the priesthood and sympathetic aristocrats, the decade witnessed the creation of a significant number of these ethnically based marketing and retail consortiums that defeated the economic strategy of the Jews, often via boycott, and enabled the supply of “villagers with their purchased necessities at Jewish merchants’ loss.”[3]Ibid.
(Hagen (2018), 14.)
A side-effect of growing awareness among Poles that they were engaged in a multi-front ethnic competition with Jews prompted some to engage in petty violence and robbery, which Słomka condemned as unhelpful. Słomka believed that “the struggle against Jewish capital was a contest … of morality, self-control, and will power.”[4]Ibid, 18.
(Hagen (2018), 14.)

Hagen demonstrates the uniformity of Polish thought on the Jews by comparing the relatively uneducated and rural Słomka’s views with those of the more cosmopolitan academic Franciszek Bujak, author of the 1919 pamphlet “The Jewish Question in Poland.” Like Słomka, Bujak argued that Polish anti-Semitism was largely a result of Jewish socio-economic dominance and the exploitation of the lower classes. In fact, Bujak a rgued that it was wrong to focus on Polish attitudes at all since

we may speak with more truth about Jewish antipolinism than about Polish antisemitism, which is not an aggressive movement displaying itself in consequent deeds, but merely a psychic reaction against damages suffered by the Polish nation from their [Jews] part. (19)

Bujak posited that Jewish clannishness gave them certain advantages over the trusting Poles, and suggested that the resulting exploitation was worsened by the Jews’ biblically based sense of superiority and adherence to a system of dual morality. When Jews did decide to leave the life of the ghetto-dwelling exploiter they invariably assimilated only “in an intruding way” into Polish society, where they “veered toward radicalism and revolution” as a result of their “inclination towards analysis and criticism.”(19) For Bujak, as for Słomka, the solution to Jewish strategic success was for Poles to heighten their sense of ethnocentrism and ethnic co-operation and engage in a process of ethnic exclusion—a social, political, and economic boycott of the Jews. Bujak viewed the prospect of violence as entailing a moral and strategic failure on the part of the Poles.

The only significant dissent from this prevailing view appears in the writings of the linguist and Slavist Jan Baudouin de Courtenay. Baudouin thought that exclusionary efforts were doomed to failure given the deeply embedded nature of Jewish involvement in Polish life, which extended even to the psychological:

I recognise the Jews’ power, i.e., the power of Jewish tradition’s influence on other human groups’ mentality. For at the base of our thinking, our beliefs about fundamental matters, we encounter a Jewish source [the Old and New Testaments]. We are ourselves but ‘modified’ Jews. Principled ‘mercilessness,’ unforgivingness, readiness to exterminate, raised to ideological level — all this we imbibed from literary monuments [the Christian Bible] of Jewish descent. Thanks to the ‘Judaization’ of our thinking even those who rush forward into wholesale attacks on Jews call themselves servants of him born in Bethlehem and profess Jehova, God of Israel. (25)

Baudouin’s proposed solutions couldn’t have been more representative of extremes. On the one hand he suggested an attempt to smother Jews with love and tolerance in the hope they would become excellent allies of the Polish nation. On the other, he mused about the prospects of “extermination, expulsion, starvation.” His ideas were, however, very much in the minority, and the position of the new Polish state was to tacitly permit the slow exclusion of the Jews from their prior positions of influence while condemning any and all instances of violence.

Violence and Exaggeration

Hagen has an excellent section looking at the slow build-up of verbal and physical provocation between the two populations. Unlike Jewish-authored texts on historical anti-Semitism, Hagen isn’t shy when it comes to including information that shatters the myth of the Jews as the passive and innocent victims of irrational European hatred. One hears about Jews taunting Polish villagers with “the streets are yours, the houses ours” and “the keys to the churches will be o urs.” (38) With physical violence being an extremely dangerous strategy for a minority population, such taunts are emblematic of the much more common rhetorical, financial, and otherwise abstract character of historical Jewish aggression. Faced with this aggression, Europeans throughout history have often relied on the ease and simplicity of their numerical superiority in the form of varieties of “physical force” responses ranging from pranks and vandalism to boycotts, small-scale evictions, and mass expulsions. Quite where on this spectrum the events of 1914–20 fall is the primary concern of Hagen’s text.

One of Hagen’s central primary sources for his investigation of anti-Jewish violence in Poland between 1914 and 1920 is a rather dubious 1920 book, Poland and Its Minority Races, produced by Arthur Lehman Goodhart, a Jewish academic and lawyer. The origins of the book lay in a series of protests against “wholesale killing of Jews in Poland” organized by Jewish groups in several American cities in 1919. Although the Polish government denied any such atrocities had taken place, and despite the lack of clear objective evidence, American-Jewish agitation was sufficient for President Wilson to appoint a small commission “to ascertain the facts.” A commission was also sent by Great Britain, in the context of similar protests in London, led by the senior diplomat Sir Horace Rumbold. The American commission was composed of Goodhart and Henry Morgenthau (infamous author of the Morgenthau Plan), and of two non-Jews, the U.S. army officer Edgar Jadwin and his colleague Homer H. Johnson. Although not mentioned in detail by Hagen, the ethnic difference between the Jews Goodhart and Morgenthau on the one hand, and the Anglo-Saxons Jadwin and Johnson on the other, resulted in two different reports (the former more or less affirming atrocity propaganda and the latter emphatically denying, or at least heavily qualifying, it) on the return of the group to the United States, with the National Polish Committee of America even publishing “The Jadwin and Johnson Report” as a separate document entirely.[5]The Jews in Poland: Official Reports of the American and British Investigating Missions · Volume 1, National Polish Committee of America, 1920, 11. Both the Goodhart text and the document produced by the National Polish Committee are available in complete form from archive.org and can be read in full here and here.

From the outset, Hagen is skeptical of contemporary Jewish accounts that alleged spontaneous mass shootings. He opens the book by making it clear the documentary record has “gaps or blindspots” and “doubtless exaggeration occurred … I have sought out multiple accounts so as to minimise bias.”[6]Hagen (2018), xvii. He later argues that “resentment-laden animosity coloured many such [Jewish] reports, which tended, in an atmosphere heavy with collective paranoia and hysteria, to exaggerate Jewish losses.”[7]Ibid, 124.
(Hagen (2018), xvii.)
He even cites one brief but telling remark from Henry Morgenthau himself, who, although promoting atrocity propaganda admitted once that “there is also no question but that some of the Jewish leaders [in Poland] had exaggerated.”[8]Ibid, 359.
(Hagen (2018), xvii.)

Patterns of Propaganda

In 1920 the National Polish Committee of America published a statement outlining the origins of atrocity propaganda against Poland:

From the very first moment, when at the beginning of November 1918, Poland regained her independence, day after day, month after month, news of dreadful Jewish pogroms were spread over the whole world. … This news found the more credit because nobody contradicted it. And nobody could contradict it. The Polish Government could not, because there was no Polish Government. … And so the news of dreadful ‘pogroms’ penetrated everywhere, spread systematically via Berlin and Vienna, and by special bureaux in Stockholm and Copenhagen, which from day to day furnished Zionist organisations possessing sufficient means and influence to give it a world-wide publication. And the news was frightful. It told of thousands of Jews not only beaten and robbed, but murdered and burned alive. As these facts were confirmed by “eye-witnesses” it is no wonder they aroused general indignation. And when Mr. Israel Cohen, the Secretary of the London Zionist Organisation, after investigating the matter on the spot published in England papers and at a meeting at Queen’s Hall in London that such atrocities had taken place in Poland in 130 towns, indignation meetings and funereal processions began all over the world.[9]The Jews in Poland: Official Reports of the American and British Investigating Missions · Volume 1, National Polish Committee of America, 1920, 55.

The Chicago Jewish weekly, The Sentinel, reported on July 23 1920 that:

Polish people are crazy with Jew-hatred and are busily engaged in pogroms. … The outrages perpetrated by old Russia against the Jews are child-play in comparison with the appalling crimes perpetrated by the Polish government and the Polish people against the Jews. … The Polish representatives abroad know that even the Spanish Inquisition has not committed so many crimes against the Jews as Poland is committing now. … Poland, born in crime and sin, will go under in a sea of crime and sin.

Newspapers in America were also flooded with lurid tales penned by local Jews claiming to have first-hand knowledge of what was happening in Poland. One “eye-witness” claimed to have counted 2,300 corpses. A “Charles Golosman” had a letter published in the New York Globe on August 18 1920 in which he writes of “massacres of the Jews by the Polish military” and adds:

A bloody pogrom was organised in my own native town, Bobruisk, with every home pillaged and the women ravaged in the open in broad daylight by the blood-thirsty Polish beasts. My own people may have become victims of some Polish assassin’s hands.

This account of the media origins of the pogrom myth, and in fact everything discussed thus far, is remarkably consistent with Klier’s findings regarding the Russian pogroms of the 1880s. As with agitation against Poland, in the 1880s the West was rocked by massive Jewish protests against “the mass killing of Jews” in the Russian empire, and (mirroring Goodhart’s book) the production of books and pamphlets on Russia’s putative ill treatment of the Jews. This followed, in Russia as in Poland, an increasingly assertive peasantry or lower class that began to act against Jewish economic exploitation through cooperatives or other non-violent methods. Atrocity propaganda may therefore be seen as an attempt to avenge or ameliorate a Jewish loss of influence in a given nation. In both cases, Western governments (Britain in the 1880s, America in 1919) sent official delegations to discover the truth of the situation. In both cases (unanimously in the case of Britain, and with divided opinion in the American group) the resulting reports cast great doubt on the Jewish narrative.

After many years of searching archives and reviewing contemporary reports produced by all sides, Klier concluded that Jewish accounts should be treated with “extreme caution,” that some were “flatly contradicted by the archival record,” and that some claims of pogroms are attached to cities where it is certain “there were no significant pogroms and no fatalities.” Klier noted that while the Jewish atrocity narrative dominated cultural discourse via the power of media, almost no government agency took it seriously once it had been investigated. The British government investigation, published as a “Blue Book,” presented, to use its own words, “an account of events at great variance with that offered by The Times.” The most notable aspect of the British Blue Book is the outright denial of mass rape, a prolific propaganda device. In January 1882, investigator Consul-General Stanley objected to all of the details contained within reports published by The Times, mentioning in particular the unfounded “accounts of the violation of women.” He further stated that his own investigations revealed that there had been no incidences of rape during the Berezovka pogrom, that violence was rare, and that much of the disturbance was restricted to property damage. In relation to property damage in Odessa, Stanley estimated it to be around 20,000 rubles, and rejected outright the Jewish claim that damage amounted to over one million rubles.

Vice-Consul Law, another independent investigator, reported that he had visited Kiev and Odessa, and could only conclude that “I should be disinclined to believe in any stories of women having been outraged in those towns.” Another investigator, Colonel Francis Maude, visited Warsaw and said that he could “not attach any importance” to atrocity reports emanating from that city. At Elizavetgrad, instead of whole streets being razed to the ground, it was discovered that a small hut had lost its roof. Accusations of murderous intent among the masses were simply unfounded and unsubstantiated by the evidence.

What Happened in Poland?

Although clear in its expression of skepticism, a crucial weakness of Hagen’s text is that it shows a willingness to attach some credence to flamboyant and discredited Jewish atrocity narratives about mass killings by mobs of Polish peasants or soldiers, and it doesn’t make full use of compelling counter-narratives such as that produced by Jadwin and Johnson, or by the National Polish Committee of America, a group that very studiously compiled and published a variety of independent reports into events in Poland. (Hagen does cite the NPC report twice in his book but otherwise demonstrates little evidence of having actually read it.) Nor does Hagen’s text incorporate other valuable material, such as testimony from Colonel C.A. Gaskill, the U.S. Army’s Relief Administration worker and technical adviser in Poland between 1919 and 1921. Gaskill and Jay P. Moffatt, Secretary of the American Legation in Warsaw, both testified that Jews had been engaged in sniper activity against Polish troops in several key locations and that Polish officers had actually issued orders against retaliating even when Polish casualties resulted from Jewish attacks.[10]New York Times, July 2, 1920. I regard it as imperative that Hagen should have noted somewhere in his book that Jews were active in most of the relevant war zones as guerrilla combatants, particularly during the Polish-Soviet war of 1918̶-1921 in which many Polish Jews were Soviet partisans, and that Jadwin and Johnson concluded their own investigations by arguing that Poland was the victim of an international smear campaign orchestrated via the media:

The coloring, the suppression, and the invention of news, the subornation of newspapers by many different methods, and the poisoning by secret influences of the instruments affecting public opinion, in short all the methods of malevolent propaganda are a menace from which Poland is a notable sufferer. This applies to propaganda both at home and from abroad.[11]The Jews in Poland: Official Reports of the American and British Investigating Missions · Volume 1, National Polish Committee of America, 1920, 18.

Although Morgenthau and Goodhart were quite happy to repeat lurid tales of mass shootings of civilians, Jadwin and Johnson offered a report that has an entirely different feel and, in their own words, offers “conclusions which differ from those of Mr. Morgenthau.” In terms of details, most official accounts seem to agree that only around 348 Jews could be confirmed as having died from violence in relevant areas between 1914 and 1920, but this is clarified further in the official British report on the violence, written by Sir Horace Rumbold. Rumbold pointed out that even if we accepted this figure of 348, only 18 of these deaths would have occurred on actual Polish territory with the rest occurring in established war zones where civilian casualties among all ethnic and national groups were commonplace.[12]The Reports of the British Mission, included in The Jews in Poland: Official Reports of the American and British Investigating Missions · Volume 1, National Polish Committee of America, 1920, 19. In these war zones, according to Jadwin, some shootings were the result of guerrilla tactics by Jewish civilians known to be sympathetic to the Bolsheviks. In one town, entering Polish soldiers were fired upon from a “certain meeting house in which Jews had congregated,” resulting in the execution of five Jewish men.[13]The Jadwin and Johnson Report, The Jews in Poland: Official Reports of the American and British Investigating Missions · Volume 1, National Polish Committee of America, 1920, 15. Captain P. Wright, a member of the British investigating team summed up the circumstances of Jewish deaths as involving not Polish prejudice but “only the expression of a mutual animosity,” and that these “excesses have been so small.”[14]Report of Captain P. Wright in The Jews in Poland: Official Reports of the American and British Investigating Missions · Volume 1, National Polish Committee of America, 1920, 33.

A very modern parallel to the incorporation of these war zone deaths into atrocity propaganda would be declaring a gunshot fatality a “Covid death” so long as the corpse can produce a positive PCR test. In this case we have an “anti-Semitic murder by Poles” simply because a Jew dies violently anywhere near Poland and under any conditions, including active warfare. Goodhart even includes the testimony of one Jewish mother who reported the “anti-Semitic” death of her son to the American commission even though she admitted her son was a member of the Bolshevik militia:

I tried to explain to her that there was a difference between the case of a man murdered in cold blood and the death of her son who had been shot while fighting for the Bolsheviks. She simply could not understand the difference and kept on repeating “He was such a fine boy.”[15]Goodhart, 52.

Since both the British and American missions concluded that violence against Jews was never endorsed or encouraged by Polish authorities, and thus meant it could not technically be classed as a pogrom, it can be said that an international diplomatic crisis and mass propaganda campaign about “mass killings” in 130 towns involving in some cases mass graves of 2,300 corpses, was provoked by the violent deaths of just 18 Jews over a six-year period. Jadwin, moreover, argued that only five Jewish deaths could be confirmed to have resulted from mob violence “since the establishment of a stable government in the Republic.”[16]The Jews in Poland: Official Reports of the American and British Investigating Missions · Volume 1, National Polish Committee of America, 1920, 10. Captain Wright explicitly stated that “though pogroms in Krakow were reported, this was not the case,” and that any violence targeting Jews in Polish territory was “small and trivial.”[17]Ibid, 47.
(The Jews in Poland: Official Reports of the American and British Investigating Missions · Volume 1, National Polish Committee of America, 1920, 10.)

Motivations

Of course, the campaign was about revenge more generally, and more so in terms of the loss of economic power and influence than the 18 (or 5) deaths. Rumbold himself concluded that violence and antagonism between the groups was probably inevitable given the economic situation of the Jews: “it is only natural that separatism should have manifested itself.” Rumbold noted the relatively recent awareness of the Poles that they could engage in their own ethnically-based economic strategies, and the non-productive nature of the Jewish population, was the real source of animosity: “Competition between the Poles and the Jewish population commenced. … The co-operative movement is becoming very strong and will undoubtedly form an important factor in the development of economic relations in Poland, so that indirectly it will be bound to affect the position of the small Jewish trader.”[18]Ibid, 20.
(The Jews in Poland: Official Reports of the American and British Investigating Missions · Volume 1, National Polish Committee of America, 1920, 10.)
Jadwin and Johnson were equally insistent that there were economic factors behind any inter-ethnic tension, and they were adamant that religious issues played a negligible role in the development of anti-Jewish attitudes:

We are convinced that religious differences as such play therein a very slight role, and that the Polish nation is disposed to religious tolerance and self-control in religious disagreements. … The relation of the Jew to the eventual political disposition of these territories is still an irritating element. These same problems are to some extent inherent in every other country where the Jewish character and habits develop a racial solidarity, necessarily accompanied by an economic and social intermingling with the other elements of the population.[19]Ibid, 13 & 17.
(The Jews in Poland: Official Reports of the American and British Investigating Missions · Volume 1, National Polish Committee of America, 1920, 10.)

There are some indications that the atrocity propaganda campaign against Poland was explicitly designed to protect Jewish interests by preventing contested territories from being granted to the Poles (then operating the peasant co-operatives against the Jews) in peace treaties. Goodhart, for example, mentions Jewish leaders in Bialystok who told him that “if Bialystok should be given to the Poles, the Jewish merchants would be ruined, because the Polish boycott would come into force.”[20]Goodhart (1920), 45. Smearing the Polish reputation internationally with accusations of mass murder and mass shootings could thus have been intended to sway the decision of the major international powers in deciding the allocation of disputed territory, potentially preventing Jews from being absorbed into a state where they would be forced to abandon non-productive ethnic economic strategies based on mass exploitation.

Finally, despite enormous economic and religious differences between Germany, Poland, Hungary, and Romania, during the 1930s, it should be noted that all of these countries developed policies in which Jews were excluded from public-sector employment, quotas were placed on Jewish representation in universities and the professions, and government-organized boycotts of Jewish businesses and artisans were staged. From Hagen’s 1996 paper:

[Anti-Semitism was] a broad regional phenomenon rather than . . . [a] set of nationally bounded histories. In this view, modern anti-Semitic ideology and politics in both Germany and Poland figure as pathologies of middle-class formation or, in an alternative formulation, as accompaniments of embourgeoisement in a setting, unlike western and southern Europe, where a relatively large (or very large) and economically very significant urban Jewish population appeared to constitute an impediment to Christian advancement. In both countries, anti-Semitism served to justify assaults on Jewish-owned or Jewish-occupied business enterprises and medical, legal, and other professional practices, as well as bureaucratic positions, which were widely seen to block the path of upward mobility to non-Jewish aspirants to bourgeois respectability and security. In both countries, more or less sporadic anti-Semitic violence fomented by political organizations of the radical right, particularly in the 1930s, elicited considerable popular support or acceptance, reflecting widespread though normally mostly latent hostility to the Jews. . . . Similar policies were also being implemented in Hungary and Romania, the other major homelands of the central European Jews. (Hagen 1996, 360, 361)

Conclusion

The fabricated Polish pogroms of 1914-20 offer a remarkable glimpse into patterns established decades earlier in the Russian empire. The basic pattern appears to be that attempts on the part of a majority population to protect their interests as an ethnic group, especially economically, will result in the utilization of media influence to create a flamboyantly exaggerated atrocity narrative about that state or locality, often involving accusations of mass shootings and mass graves. Because of their entrenchment in popular consciousness via mass communications, these narratives are incredibly difficult to overturn, even with highly critical official government reports. The Russian pogrom myth is an excellent example given that it was repeated during the Polish hoax (The Sentinel: “The outrages perpetrated by old Russia against the Jews are child-play in comparison with the appalling crimes perpetrated by the Polish government and the Polish people against the Jews”). The reality, of course, was that the Russian and Polish ‘atrocities’ were equally baseless and fraudulent. And yet, look hard enough today, and you will certainly see some Jewish Twitter personality inevitably claim a distant relative mass murdered in the Russian pogroms. These are deeply engrained fictions that are internalized by Jews and go some way to generating fear, antipathy, and aggression towards majority White populations who are always said to have the same potential for mass violence.

Atrocity narratives remain an important strategic device, and the tactic is visible even on the small scale in events like Charlottesville. The actual events of Charlottesville are by any consideration, to borrow Captain Wright’s words, “small and trivial,” involving no more petty violence and vandalism than any other major protest of recent years (arguably much less), and one death of ambiguous cause. And yet hasn’t Charlottesville adopted the air of a “Kishinev” in the way it has been transformed, via propaganda, into a kind of pogrom, perpetrated by an angry White mob? Journalist David Greenberg reported on “the siege of a Charlottesville synagogue during the right-wing rampage there in 2017” during an article scaremongering about “America’s Forgotten Pogroms.” But for the presence of modern recording technology, one can easily imagine that tales would have emerged from Charlottesville of all manner of killings and assaults.

As a final note, I should say that we are all perfectly aware of the creeping attempts in all of Europe and the rest of the West to silence any questioning of that ultimate Jewish atrocity narrative. In our attempt to defend the Western position, we could do well to start with the approach of any good defense lawyer — to critique the credibility of the accuser. Looking at the Russian and Polish cases, do we see a record of truth or fabrication? Is there a case for believing such narratives, or asking further questions?

I’ll conclude with remarks made by Rupert Hughes in the New York Times Book Review, July 18 1920:

Has everybody forgotten the procession in New York and in other cities where mourning was worn and dirges were sung for the slaughtered multitudes of the Polish pogroms? Has anyone apologized to Poland for accusing her of rivalling Turkey, in Armenia? I have not seen the apologies.[1]Hagen, William W. “Before the ‘Final Solution’: Toward a Comparative Analysis of Political Anti-Semitism in Interwar Germany and Poland.” The Journal of Modern History 68, no. 2 (1996): 351–81. MacDonald cites this work on pages 53 and 55 of the paperback edition of SAID.

Notes

[1] Hagen, William W. “Before the ‘Final Solution’: Toward a Comparative Analysis of Political Anti-Semitism in Interwar Germany and Poland.” The Journal of Modern History 68, no. 2 (1996): 351–81. MacDonald cites this work on pages 53 and 55 of the paperback edition of SAID.

[2] Hagen (2018), 14.

[3] Ibid.

[4] Ibid, 18.

[5] The Jews in Poland: Official Reports of the American and British Investigating Missions · Volume 1, National Polish Committee of America, 1920, 11.

[6] Hagen (2018), xvii.

[7] Ibid, 124.

[8] Ibid, 359.

[9] The Jews in Poland: Official Reports of the American and British Investigating Missions · Volume 1, National Polish Committee of America, 1920, 55.

[10] New York Times, July 2, 1920.

[11] The Jews in Poland: Official Reports of the American and British Investigating Missions · Volume 1, National Polish Committee of America, 1920, 18.

[12] The Reports of the British Mission, included in The Jews in Poland: Official Reports of the American and British Investigating Missions · Volume 1, National Polish Committee of America, 1920, 19.

[13] The Jadwin and Johnson Report, The Jews in Poland: Official Reports of the American and British Investigating Missions · Volume 1, National Polish Committee of America, 1920, 15.

[14] Report of Captain P. Wright in The Jews in Poland: Official Reports of the American and British Investigating Missions · Volume 1, National Polish Committee of America, 1920, 33.

[15] Goodhart, 52.

[16] The Jews in Poland: Official Reports of the American and British Investigating Missions · Volume 1, National Polish Committee of America, 1920, 10.

[17] Ibid, 47.

[18] Ibid, 20.

[19] Ibid, 13 & 17.

[20] Goodhart (1920), 45.

(Republished from My Corner by permission of author or representative)
 
• Category: History, Ideology • Tags: Academia, American Media, Anti-Semitism, Jews, Poland 
Hide 286 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. Dutch Boy says:

    The critical difference between Jews and other ethnic groups: the Jewish strategy of using moral corruption to weaken and displace the people they live among (vodka for the Polish peasants, sexual deviancy for us).

  2. RestiveUs says:

    …That and a disdain for common labor.

  3. Rich says:

    Imagine if White Christians regained their sense of community and looked out for each other against other groups as they did in the past in America? Jews, being a minority everywhere they’ve lived, are well practiced in organizing themselves and taking advantage of other groups’ disordered behavior. In this new polyglot America, White Christians have to become more organized, like the Polish people did with their communes and boycotts and return to watching out for each other’s interests. Instead, what we have is the old Wasp elite partnering with the Jewish elite to divide and conquer. Whites barely woke up in Virginia, of all places, defeating an insane leftist Whitey (and electing a black lt governor by the way). A 1 or 2% victory in a formerly Confederate state is a win, but it’s way too close.

    • Agree: Ace
    • Replies: @anarchyst
    , @Avery
    , @simple mind
  4. anarchyst says:
    @Rich

    Actually, if Catholicism reverted back to its “roots” we might have a chance to reverse the judeo-Protestantism that we presently live under.
    Although, Martin Luther’s rallying against the excesses of the Roman Catholic Church was somewhat honorable, this was the “wedge” that jews used to infiltrate Christianity of the day.
    Eventually even the Catholic Church succumbed to the judeo-Protestant siren song with the changes wrought by the “Vatican II Ecumenical Council”.
    Today, there is considerable “pushback” from traditional Catholics who are against the excesses and changes of the “Vatican II Ecumenical Council”.
    This whole “jews are our elder brothers” claim that Christians use needs to be put on the ash heap of history…
    Jews must accept full responsibility for the crucifixion and death of Jesus Christ. Christian teachings must reflect that fact.

  5. monopduly says:
    @Dutch Boy

    Both Joyce and MacDonald could benefit from the scientific literature one ‘phenotypic manipulation’ of the Host by the Intraspecific Social Parasite. This would include the us of drugs, and vaccines, as well as engineered cultural change, to weaken the Host’s resistance to parasitism.

    Ethno-Nationalism as Host Evasion Under Intraspecific Social Parasitism with Phenotypic Manipulation

  6. Rich says:
    @anarchyst

    A reversion to traditional Catholicism could definitely help. I fear that won’t happen. The present anti-Pope, Francis, has done serious damage to the College of Cardinals and the next Pope will be an out and out liberal. There are voices in the Catholic community trying to fight this “liberal” tilt, but Bergoglio has some very evil men around him and they have been trying to destroy the Church from within. Eventually we win, I’ve read the last page of Revelations, but it looks like we’re in for some rough times as far as the Church is concerned. I guess we survived bad Popes in the past, but this looks diabolical to me.

  7. @anarchyst

    Although, Martin Luther’s rallying against the excesses of the Roman Catholic Church was somewhat honorable, this was the “wedge” that jews used to infiltrate Christianity of the day.

    Luther saw himself as a good Catholic and reformer. Had the RC Church accepted Luther’s request to debate, instead of ex-communicating him and ordering his death, “the jews” may have had nothing to infiltrate. The infiltration, if there was any, should have been stopped when Luther published Von den Jüden und iren Lügen in 1543.

    • Replies: @profnasty
  8. anon[214] • Disclaimer says:

    these poor jews, always fleeing one pogrom after another

  9. @Rich

    ” The present anti-Pope, Francis, has done serious damage to the College of Cardinals and the next Pope will be an out and out liberal. There are voices in the Catholic community trying to fight this “liberal” tilt, but Bergoglio has some very evil men around him and they have been trying to destroy the Church from within. ”

    I don’t recall anyone complaining about “evil men” “destroying the Church from within” during the many decades that “the College of Cardinals and the … Pope” were running an international pedophile gang. The first Pope to take them on and it’s “he’s an anti-Pope!”

    Pro-pedophile = “traditional Catholicism”
    Anti-pedophile = “out and out liberal… looks diabolical to me.”

    And you wonder why the Reformation caught on.

    https://counter-currents.com/2020/06/papa-francesco-vs-steve-bannon/

    • Replies: @Rich
    , @Feli
  10. @anarchyst

    “Eventually even the Catholic Church succumbed to the judeo-Protestant siren song with the changes wrought by the “Vatican II Ecumenical Council”.
    “Today, there is considerable “pushback” from traditional Catholics who are against the excesses and changes of the “Vatican II Ecumenical Council”.

    Curiously, none of these “excesses and changes” affected the Church’s teachings on human sexuality, which were instead reaffirmed by the arbitrary whim of Paul VI, under the influence of a gang of French homosexual clerics, and designed to punished dirty breeders and elevate the higher spirituality of celibate males. Junk the Latin Mass, but no divorce for you filthy breeders!

    https://counter-currents.com/2020/06/papa-francesco-vs-steve-bannon/

    • Replies: @anarchyst
  11. anarchyst says:
    @James J O'Meara

    Why should the Church’s teachings on human sexuality be changed?
    The homosexual / pedophile / paraphilic behavior of some Catholic priests that is despicable, abominable and criminal in nature was brought on with the recruitment of homosexuals to the priesthood, ostensibly because of a severe shortage of Catholic priests–still not a good “excuse” to allow homosexuals within the priesthood.
    The homosexual candidate had to promise “not to act on his homosexual inclinations”–something that it is impossible for homosexuals to abide by.
    The “rot” extends to the seminary system, which openly recruited homosexuals, who would find the Catholic priesthood a good “cover” for their sordid activities. It was called the “lavender lobby” and was responsible for rejecting truly worthy (heterosexual) candidates for the priesthood.
    It would be interesting to observe the number of bishops and cardinals who were and still are a part of this sordid criminal behavior.
    When it comes to celibacy, you have a good point.
    Most people are unaware that celibacy was instituted by the Roman Catholic Church during the middle ages to keep Church property from being willed to and inherited by descendants of priests, bishops, and cardinals. Celibacy was imposed as a purely economic move to keep church property under church control with absolutely no basis in religious dogma.
    In fact, there are Catholic sects outside the Roman Catholic sect that allow married priests. Perhaps, a “middle ground” could be established. Married candidates and deacons could be married while those who are unmarried as priests would still observe celibacy.
    Married Episcopal priests who convert to Catholicism bring their families with them to the Church and are fully recognized as Roman Catholic priests.
    The question of divorce within the Catholic Church has a number of good answers. While divorce is prohibited within the Catholic Church, annulments are still permitted. The difference is that an annulment is a declaration that “no (valid) marriage existed” and as such, once a “writ” is issued, the person(s) are free to remarry within the Church. “Immaturity” is the most common reason to grant an annulment. These annulments are not much different than the medieval “indulgences” that Martin Luther rallied against. A large amount of cash can “grease the skids” and get a timely annulment ruling issued.
    Yes, the Catholic Church has its warts, but can still be used as a force for good in the world.

    • Replies: @HdC
    , @chris
  12. Rich says:
    @James J O'Meara

    We’re you an altar boy, Jimmy? From what I’ve read, the percentage of pedophiles in the Church was about the same as in any other profession. Pedophiles tend to go into the type of work that gives them access to children, and then they go after the vulnerable. They should all be burned at the stake. Pedophile priest, minister, rabbi, imam or soccer coach. But there’s a reason the media went after the Catholics, they were one of the last bulwarks against the homosexual agenda. Once they pulled this card out of their sleeve they got homosexual marriage and a host of other leftist nonsense pushed through. When you jump on that bandwagon, you get in bed with bolsheviks. Are you comfortable there?

    • Agree: Irish Savant, Sisifo
  13. anarchyst says:
    @Rich

    The rate of incidence for sex crimes is about 1 %.
    That is Far less than that of Protestants, JEW Rabbis, Boy Scout troopmasters or certainly Public School administrators. The leader in sex crimes against children is usually inter family related ie Step Fathers, Friends, uncles etc.
    JEWs made a crisis, than brought suit against the centralized Catholic Church and in so doing, forever tarnished the clergy who was their archnemesis.

    Free Republic

    Pedophilia Only a Catholic Sin?
    August 14th, 2009 | Kevin Roeten

    [MORE]

    Pedophilia Only a Catholic Sin?

    It turns out pedophilia is an incorrect term, and Catholics aren’t responsible for most of it.

    Shockingly, AP breaks out of their typical liberal mold and reports Insurance companies shed light on extent of sex abuse in Protestant churches, that sexual abuse of minors has been rampant. But in their statement, they indirectly say members of the Catholic Church are not the majority abusers.

    AP discusses the raw numbers from three companies that insure the majority of protestant churches in America (Church Mutual, Guide One, and Brotherhood Mutual), and typically receive 260 reports/yr of people under 18 being sexually abused. Compare that with ~228 credible accusations/yr against Catholic clerics since 1950 (documented abuse records).

    Together with that information, it is known that the Catholic Church greatly outnumbers any specific Protestant denomination, and the data for Protestant churches is available only for the last seven years. Ever since the first sexual abuse cases had been reported, Catholics have had requirements: 1) police background check done on all volunteers,including priests, 2) a second person be present at all religious functions, and 3) all personnel involved with minors must take routine checks with Protecting God’s Children.

    Without a doubt, sexual abuse of a minor is one of the most despicable crimes and sins that man can perpetrate. But predators seem to thrive in an atmosphere where the base congregation is one of the most trusted organizations that exist.

    Philip Jenkins, in his 1996 book Pedophiles and Priests, [[link edited for length]], looked at the problem objectively and dispassionately. Jenkins (who is not Catholic) found that true pedophilia is extremely rare, and perhaps more common among Protestant clergy, and is even more common among married laymen.

    He found that in most sexual abuse cases (under the age of consent), the behavior is actually a variety of homosexuality. This sexual attraction with very young men that combine the charm of boyishness with sexual maturity is actually called ephebophilia. Pedophilia is really a psychiatric term meaning sexual interest in children below the age of puberty.

    The worst sex crimes against children is in the Jewish communities and protestant churches.
    Tomasi was not reserved with criticism either and citing data published by the daily Christian Science Monitor, which was founded a hundred years ago by the Christian Science Church, said that the Catholic Church cleaned its house, Jutarnji List writes.
    According to their figures the majority of the US child abuse cases happens in the Protestant churches and Jewish communities, says Tomasi.

    MORE PROTESTANT MINISTERS GUILTY OF PEDOPHILIA THAN CATHOLIC PRIESTS, NEW RESEARCH REVEALS

    A Penn State historian, Philip Jenkins, has done an in depth research of pedophilia and sexual abuse among the clergy and has come up with some rather eye opening facts. It seems that while 1.7 percent of Catholic clergy have been guilty of pedophilia (or sexual abuse particularly of boys), a whopping TEN percent of Protestant ministers have been found guilty of pedophilia!

    This is all the more interesting, notes Jenkins, since there has been NO media term Pastor Pedophilia coined at all!

    Jenkins theorizes that the media, proving the point of the necessity of sexual promiscuity, overemphasizes any instance of pedophilia found among the Catholic clergy since it can use this to criticize the entire idea of celibacy. But it is interesting that the NON Celibate Protestant ministers have a MUCH GREATER problem with it than the celibate Catholic priests!

    Protestant pastor pedophilia is not within the frame of our social constructionists as Jenkins calls the media:

    In the 1980s, [Pastor] Leyva had abused perhaps one hundred boys in several Southern states, but few of us ever learned of it. Leyva had the distinction of being a Pentecostal minister and was, therefore, not within the frame of those who were busy constructing reality. The same is true of the three brothers, all Baptist ministers, who were charged with child molestation in the 1990s; the public learned little about this highly unusual series of cases because it was not deemed worthy of dissemination by those fixated on Catholic scandals. [1]

    • Agree: Bardon Kaldian
    • Replies: @Sepp
  14. ‘Anti-Semitism was] a broad regional phenomenon rather than . . . [a] set of nationally bounded histories. In this view, modern anti-Semitic ideology and politics in both Germany and Poland figure as pathologies of middle-class formation or, in an alternative formulation, as accompaniments of embourgeoisement in a setting, unlike western and southern Europe, where a relatively large (or very large) and economically very significant urban Jewish population appeared to constitute an impediment to Christian advancement…’

    Without wishing to confirm, deny, or even closely define anti-semitism in Nazi Germany, this doesn’t strike me as a particularly valid analysis of the situation in Germany.

    The gentile middle class in Germany was advanced enough, and the Jews both small enough in numbers and so assimilated that I don’t see how you could compare the two countries.

    Just for starters, in Poland Jews were around ten percent of the population in Poland; around one percent in Germany. In Germany, the Jews spoke the same language as the German gentiles: German. In Poland, they spoke Yiddish.

    In short, in Poland Jews were a large and linguistically alien population in a nation virtually lacking a gentile middle class. In Germany, they were a small, German speaking minority, generally on about the same footing as at least the more prosperous elements of the gentile population.

    The two situations really aren’t remotely comparable. One might as well equate blacks in the United States with blacks in South Africa. It’s not that one is good and the other bad; it’s just that they’re not related.

  15. ‘…. . . Similar policies were also being implemented in Hungary and Romania, the other major homelands of the central European Jews…’

    I’d add that the situations of the Jews vis-a-vis the demographically dominant gentile population was equally idiosyncratic in Hungary and Romania — and I see no reference to Austria or the Ukraine.

    Really, this seems to me to be a matter of constructing equivalences where there aren’t any. There are some common threads — the adherence of Jews to revolutionary socialism, their positions of greater or lesser economic and even social privilege (29% of the officer corps in the Austro-Hungarian empire was Jewish) — but the differences were at least equally impressive. I don’t see the situations of Jews or the motives of anti-semitic policies in Germany, Poland, Hungary, and Romania as being somehow equivalent to each other. Like, say, the position of American Indians in Mexico, the United States, and Canada, each was sui generis.

    • Replies: @nokangaroos
  16. Wokechoke says:
    @Colin Wright

    Germany used to be an awful lot bigger to the East before ww1 and after ww2 became a rump state. The Junkers and German yeoman farmers and townie Burghers would have had a long experience of the Jews in the Vistula watershed. Both as collaborating Yiddish (German dialect) speakers and at times as competing elite. Germany as a tribe was decimated in the East by ww1 and ww2 and in certain places eliminated.

  17. Not “sects,” though those also exists. Celibacy is only enforced within the Roman Rite (and a few ancient local remnants like the Ambrosian in Milan). The various other rites, formerly lumped as “Eastern,” are not subject to the Canon law on clerical celibacy.

  18. Anonymous[531] • Disclaimer says:
    @Rich

    The priest pedophile scandal is little more than Trump-Russia collusion propaganda though directed at Christ and His Church for the last 40 years. It is a tactic and has been used as a wrecking ball by the Christ-haters to bankrupt and destroy His Church.

  19. Sepp says:

    Another excellent article by Andrew Joyce, who has become my favorite author here at UR.

    So after Poland finally regained its independence after Versailles, the Jews of Poland, predominantly Bolsheviks sympathetic to their brethren, the Bolshevik Jews of Russia, rose up against the nascent Poland in an attempt at a communist putsch.

    When the Poles put down their pathetic hissy fit of a “Revolution”, the Jews went to their “Plan B” which comes straight out of the Protocols of Zion: They claimed that there was a 6 million “Holocaust” going on. Of course we know that it was actually the Jews themselves who were attempting their own revolutionary take over of the Polish government, and had they succeeded more than 6 million Poles would have died at the hand of these sadistic racial supremacists. Of course the Poles later suffered immensely for their failure to support the Third Reich in their attempt to eliminate Jewish malfeasance, corruption and hate from Northern Europe. Unfortunately 45 years of Communist rule was not enough to knock some sense into them.

    One of these days all of this Jewish holocaust projection is going to come back home to roost.

    • Agree: Arthur MacBride, HdC
  20. Sepp says:
    @Dutch Boy

    It is far worse than mere “moral corruption”. They are well known throughout history as well poisoners, and this current plandemic is really just another case of the Jew Flu.

    While Jews were pushing Vodka on Poles and Russians, they were pushing opium on India and China.

    Many have identified “Prohibition” as little more than a Jewish attempt to eliminated their competition from German breweries, many in Millwaukee. Of course the Bronfam family in Canada and many others made fortunes running hard alcohol across the great lakes into the US.

    After WWI for Israel, Jews became morphine pushers to all the goyim who had been wounded during their war.

    The Sackler family is famous for its Oxycontin and the millions of ruined lives and even millions of deaths from the follow on addictions to Heroin when their victims could no longer legally procure Oxycontin.

    But by all appearances, the Hebrews crowning achievement when it comes to destroying the goyim is their newest drug: Fentanyl.

    Now many Jews will claim that there is no proof that it is Jewish gangsters that are doing this. But to paraphrase Guttle Schnapper Rothschild who famously said “If my sons did not want wars, there would be none”:

    “If the Hebrew owned MSM and Hebrew run Legal System did not want drug addiction running rampant in every city, there would be none.”

    • Agree: JWalters, Druid55
    • Replies: @marylou
    , @JWalters
  21. @Colin Wright

    Colin: The primary difference between the Jewish populations in Poland, particularly in the Shtetls and the smaller urban centers and those in Germany were primarily racial. Taking my cure from Stephen Birmingham’s “Our Crowd”, the primarily Geman-Jewish population in New York, in the 1880’s up to WWI, were most disdainful of Polish and other Jews in the Slavic lands, calling them names like “Kikes” and “Yids”.

    What this tells us is that those German Jewish populations were mainly drawn from two somewhat discrete populations, the originally North African Berber Jews who were converted to that religion early in the First Millennium A.D. and those Jews descended from the ancient Hebrews who were deported by Titus and other Roman Emperors during the “troubles” as well as converts to Judaism and non-national Jewish folk who had lived in Western Europe for Centuries.

    On the other hand, the Eastern Jews were mostly drawn from the Khazarian Empire which had been converted to Judaism in ca 740 A.D. by their ruling Kagan. That Empire had been defeated by a combination of early Ukrainian/Russian and Persian forces in the early 11th Century and those populations ultimately scattered Westwards during and following the Mongol invasions.

    The Western Judaics had over the centuries not only assimilated fully on a linguistic basis, but had also intermarried to some fair degree, as signaled by the presence of a considerable number of German Jews having red hair, blue eyes and other features not frequently associated with their religious ethnicity. There is no question that those “Westerners” looked down on their religious…but not ethnographic-linguistic co-religionists, as physically dirty and relatively uncivilized.

    There is NO Jewish people. There are some five distinctive Jewish peoples. And WHY does this moth-eaten old term “anti-Semitic” still have resonance? When only a minority of Judaics in the Western world have any significant admixture of ancient Hebrew DNA, do even the most knuckle-dragging Joo-haters use that term. A far more telling term would be “Judeophobic”.

    • Thanks: profnasty
    • Replies: @AndrewR
    , @Colin Wright
  22. The main thrust of the article was not about squabbles around Roman Catholicism, the bastard child of the Roman Empire and hierarchical “bishops” of the Orthodox strains of Churchianity or Crosstianity as against Gnostic Christians who tended more to follow the actual precepts of Jesus than the empire-building church bureaucracy.

    Luther did not go far enough in attempting to reform Catholicism as the entire edifice was artificial and largely the product of a combination of Constantinian imperial schemes and the insanity of Augustine of Hippo. The damnable Augustine came up with the Anti-Christ doctrine of “Original Sin”. That was a horrible perversion, yet formed the basis for social control on the part of the Vatican.

    The “Holy” Bible was NOT written or inspired by “the Father” as Jesus referred to Creator—as against that bloodthirsty, hateful, Yahweh of the ancient Hebrews. So get over the silliness, guys, and seek out the spirit path so well articulated by Jesus and as written in the gospels which were not included by the Builder, the Emperor of Rome, Constantine the blood-luster. Read the true actual and true Gospel of Thomas for some insights into the phenomenon of the great way-shower, Jesus.

    Why were the Gospels of Thomas, Phillip and others excluded from “The BOOK”? They were not about the false religion of vicarious atonement…the doctrine of redemption from our “sins” by Jesus dying on the cross. Jesus pointed out that Creator is Within. He did not set out to create a religion, but to show us the way to living a more spiritual life. We are not apart from Spirit, the Creator. We are a part OF Creator.

    • Agree: Marcion
    • Replies: @Anonymous
  23. Power of the Vatican and its agents. Somehow, a posting I made regarding the essentially false Christianity centering around the early “bishops” and their bureaucratic hierarchy versus the followers of Jesus’ message, the Gnostic Christians, must have been a bit too much for somebody, the Unz site “timed out” and my screed wafted away into never-never land.

    It would have pissed-off the religious nuts haunting this site to no end. Well I just don’t care about internecine squabbles amongst Organized monotheistic religionists. Spiritually, they are zilch.

    • Replies: @Hibernian
  24. Anon[415] • Disclaimer says:

    I’ve been kicked out of 109 bars, but it’s always been the other guys’ fault

    • LOL: Realist
  25. Sepp says:
    @anarchyst

    I think that you are not paying enough “respect” to Sabbatean Frankist C-Jews here. In the Sabbateans inverted world, false claims of “belief” are not only good, but necessary. In their perverted universe, only your hidden beliefs matter, and all levels of sin are good.

    So the question becomes how many Catholic Priests, Protestant Ministers and Muslim Mullahs are Sabbateans. We know that the Donmeh that took over Turkey on the eve of WWI and who committed the Armenian Genocide were all Sabbateans. The Jesuits were, and certainly still are, completely compromised. The Rothschilds and Weishaupt were both Sabbateans, so when they infiltrated and took over control of the major Freemason lodges across Europe and the US, the Sabbateans actually took control there too. I think we can rest assured that the US Revolution was a Sabbatean coup judging by all the hanky panky of Ben Franlin in England and the involvement of Jefferson in the French Revolution. Lafayette, a Freemason, was also involved in both the French and the US revolutions.

    Jarrod and Ivanka Kushner are avowed Kabbalists, which is almost as good as a confession to being a Sabbatean, and that means that Trump likely is one too. And of course Trump was deeply involved with Epstein, Victoria’s secret and the corruption and prostitution of under age models. Prince Andrew was heavily involved with Epstein and Maxwell, and Prince Charles was a close buddy to Jimmy Saville.

    So the entire elite across the west is up to their necks in Sabbatean kompromat, if not outright membership in the satanic sect. This is where Hunter Biden’s laptop, Hillary’s Laptop, Maxwell’s black book, and the refusal to allow names of thousands of Sabbateans therein to be released to the public is so critical.

    So when the entire elite class, all of Hollywood, the music industry, the MSM and Big Tech are all either directly Sabbatean or compromised by them, how can one really hold up the Catholic Church for special disabuse when virtually every institution across the west is in the foul grip of the Sabbatean Frankists?

    Here is a fascinating Podcast by Peter Hammond about the Sabbateans:

    https://andrewcarringtonhitchcock.com/2021/12/13/ach-1666-dr-peter-hammond-the-real-story-of-1666-and-the-sabbatean-origins-of-the-new-world-order/

    Robert Sephyr also has some great videos on the topic:

    • Replies: @SolontoCroesus
    , @S
    , @mc23
  26. “we may speak with more truth about Jewish antipolinism than about Polish antisemitism, which is not an aggressive movement displaying itself in consequent deeds, but merely a psychic reaction against damages suffered by the Polish nation from their [Jews] part.”

    Isn’t that exactly what was so disturbing for Hitler?

  27. Wielgus says:
    @Colin Wright

    In Poland a fairly significant number of Jews did not even speak Polish. This is implicit in your post but it might be worth drawing it out. Few if any German Jews were ignorant of German.

    • Agree: Colin Wright
    • Replies: @Peter Akuleyev
  28. @Colin Wright

    – I should probably note Austro-Hungarian Jews were not especially warlike
    (though more so than in France) but the army replenished its reserve
    officer corps through an ROTC-like institution called
    Einjährig-Freiwillige, shorter and softer than regular service and
    geared towards academics 😉

    • Thanks: Colin Wright
    • Replies: @Wielgus
  29. Miro23 says:

    Słomka believed that “the struggle against Jewish capital was a contest … of morality, self-control, and will power.”

    The question now is whether US gentiles have the morality, self-control and willpower to take back their country.

    • Replies: @Realist
  30. Thank you, Andrew Joyce, for this valuable review.
    Hoping others will forward it appropriately, as I intend to do.
    Jan Słomka’s text is also at archive — https://archive.org/details/fromserfdomtosel00somk/page/n1/mode/2up

    Contrast an honest rural patriot to grandee Goodhart, scion of the Lehman financial empire, who taught law at Oxford U where buildings/lecture halls etc bear his name, also was decorated by a compliant British crown.

    Respect to those US and British dissenters against organised “newspaper” hysteria. They would be appalled at their countries being obedient servants of the Beast today, though perhaps not surprised as even then the 6 million story was in full flight.

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
  31. American-Jewish agitation was sufficient for President Wilson to appoint a small commission “to ascertain the facts.” A commission was also sent by Great Britain, in the context of similar protests in London, led by the senior diplomat Sir Horace Rumbold. The American commission was composed of Goodhart and Henry Morgenthau (infamous author of the Morgenthau Plan), and of two non-Jews,

    The Henry Morgenthau referred to here, I believe, is Henry Morgenthau Sr., the father of the HM Jr., the author of the Morganthau plan.

  32. Wielgus says:
    @nokangaroos

    In the A-H Empire’s army it was so common for regimental doctors to be Jewish that it was almost a stereotype.

  33. Mike Tre says:
    @Rich

    The Catholic church made two huge mistakes:

    1. They allowed homosexuals to become priests.

    2. Once the homosexual priests started buggering teenage alter boys, the church tried to cover it up.

    But let’s be clear on terms. The homosexual priests we NOT pedophiles. Pedophilia is the attraction to PREpubescent children. The homosexual priests were and are hebephiles and ephebophiles, meaning they are attracted to pubescent and post pubescent teenage boys respectively. Teenage boys being the primary focus of homosexual men for grooming and buggering.

    https://www.churchmilitant.com/news/article/priestly-sex-abuse-would-not-have-happened-without-homosexuals

    • Agree: anarchyst, mc23
  34. Anonymous[661] • Disclaimer says:

    I appreciate this excellent article by Andrew Joyce. Any ray of light breaking through a crack in the iron wall of historical propaganda is more than welcome.

    The research on Poland strongly complements Solzhenitsyn’s exhaustive research on the same issues in Russia in his book Two Hundred Years Together, which I would also highly recommend to anyone interested in this subject.

    • Agree: Arthur MacBride, chris
    • Replies: @chris
  35. Anonymous[124] • Disclaimer says:

    Why don’t Christians blame Jews for killing Jesus? Did aardvarks pressure Pilate to crucify Him? Did Buddhists choose Barabbas?

    Jews view Christians collectively. Why don’t the followers of Jesus return the favor?

    Why fear the charge of “antisemitism” when Jews openly laud antichristianism?

    Was Jesus just a Jew myth to control goyim forever?

    SANHEDRIN: “Let’s make Shlomo-the-Retard a prince. We’ll use our hasbara/PR skills to con goyim to believe he’s SOY: the Son of Yahweh. Then we’ll get Rome to kill him from jealousy. We’ll swear Shlomo arose from the dead as a zombie, telling his fans to only turn cheeks when attacked. And bend, offering arses when threatened. And to never-ever-EVAH fight back. THAT’s how we’ll rule the world!”

    The only reason 2% of the USA (Jews) have so much power is because white Christians refuse to unite and fight for white Christian values. They’re like Republicans: all talk, no action.

    • Replies: @Wielgus
    , @Realist
  36. Anonymous[124] • Disclaimer says:

    Augustine came up with the Anti-Christ doctrine of “Original Sin”.

    To excuse his own vices as a drunken whoremeister. “Make me chaste, O Lord! But not yet.”

    Nothing says “love” like a reformed douche making humans feel guilty for sins the latter didn’t commit.

    The Hippo hypocrite is like Freud. Sigmund cucked, too. He decided to blame babies for lusting after their parents when Viennese swells shunned him…for discovering they molested their own children.

    Per the modern Church: Catholic Charities is getting billion\$ from Biden, Inc. to “care” for illegal aliens. They also use donations from current white parishioners to fund the brown-black invasion of the USA. Priests count on minorities to fill pews vacated by ever-more-deceasing whites.

    • Replies: @emerging majority
  37. profnasty says:
    @Curmudgeon

    If you have heard the Hon. E.Michael Jones describe Luther you would poop yourself. He is as vehement a critic of Protestantism as Jews are of ‘Nazism’.
    Catholics seem the original Globalists.

    • Replies: @Curmudgeon
  38. Wielgus says:
    @Anonymous

    The answer is that they used to, but this has for the most part been deleted. For example, reference to “perfidious Jews” somewhere in the Roman Litany. Once in a while a Jew will be open about despising Christ, like Fran Taubman of this parish, in a spectacular own goal.

    • Replies: @gotmituns
  39. Realist says:
    @Dutch Boy

    The critical difference between Jews and other ethnic groups: the Jewish strategy of using moral corruption to weaken and displace the people they live among (vodka for the Polish peasants, sexual deviancy for us).

    Blaming the weakness and moral depravity of White gentiles on Jews is a losing tactic.

    It is confirmation that White gentiles have low moral self-control.

    • Agree: Fart Blossom
    • LOL: simple mind
  40. DATA says:

    (Headline USA) A rabbi who was badly wounded in a deadly anti-Semitic attack at the Chabad of Poway synagogue in Southern California was sentenced Tuesday to 14 months in federal prison for running a multimillion-dollar donation fraud, authorities said. Yisrael Goldstein, 60, also was ordered to pay about \$2.8 million in restitution. He pleaded guilty in 2020 to wire and tax fraud. https://headlineusa.com/wounded-rabbi-sentenced-fraud/

  41. chris says:
    @Anonymous

    Yeah, great point about the parallel to Solzhenitsyn’s work, who documents his findings more thoroughly, but which shows a very similar dynamic.

    Events in Russia, however, were another reason for a comparison.

    Besides the possible economic reasons for the anti-Polish campaign carried out in the West, the brutal consolidation of power, going on concurrently next door in Russia in the wake of the Russian revolution, dominated by Jewish activists, cannot be ignored as a motivating factor.

    The anti-Polish campaign may well be considered as an attempt to divert focus from Russia onto its neighbor, and thus preempt negative information coming out about those already sizable crimes already underway. Crimes, which would, by the early 1930s reach unprecedented proportions in modern times in Europe.

    • Agree: Ace
    • Thanks: emerging majority
  42. Realist says:
    @Miro23

    The question now is whether US gentiles have the morality, self-control and willpower to take back their country.

    They are too busy pissing and moaning…blaming the Jews for their own weakness.

  43. Realist says:
    @Anonymous

    The only reason 2% of the USA (Jews) have so much power is because white Christians refuse to unite and fight for white Christian values. They’re like Republicans: all talk, no action.

    Exactly, they would rather piss and moan. The fact is the Ashkenazi Jews are just smarter than gentiles.

    • Agree: lastdance
  44. KenH says:
    @Rich

    The Catholic hierarchy covered up pedophilia and kept quietly moving the pedo priests to other churches around the country where they continued to molest more boys. Many rank and file Catholics refused to believe that their beloved priests could do such things to children which didn’t help matters.

    Catholic doctrine was not the problem but there was an effort by homosexuals to infiltrate the church that spanned decades and Vatican city itself is a den of iniquity according to some reports. Homosexuals gravitate to positions of trust and authority over children.

    Catholicism will never be a bulwark against anything that threatens white people and the West until it cleans out the moral rot in Vatican city and throughout the church hierarchy.

    Of course we never hear of pedophile scandals among Jewish rabbis or Muslim Imans and they no doubt exist. Pederasty is a big problem with those two religions but that doesn’t fit the current narrative.

    • Replies: @Rich
    , @emerging majority
  45. gotmituns says:
    @Wielgus

    For the most part, people know at some level the jews are garbage. But right now they fear the jews (rightfully so). When the shit hits the fan and the minorities go stark raving mad, people will finally deal very sharply with the jews. Then the jews will leave (the few who survive) and look for a new host.

    • Replies: @Colin Wright
  46. AndrewR says:
    @emerging majority

    I don’t believe your claim about most Ashkenazim having very little Hebrew DNA, but it’s really besides the point. Regardless of their genes, they tend to think of themselves as one people who are not only distinct from but better than all other people. And unlike Christians, Muslims or Buddhists, they don’t really allow conversion. It is a racial thing for all intents and purposes.

    • Agree: profnasty
  47. An excellent debunking of the Russian pogrom lies can be found in Goldwin Smith’s (superb) book, Essays on Questions of the Day, 1893, Macmillan and co. The chapter is titled The Jewish Question and ranges far beyond the non-atrocities in Russia. The book also includes an equally convincing essay on the disastrous consequences sure to follow if women suffrage became the law. Smith was quite the illustrious academic – he was no fringe character at all. The writing is first rate, by the way.

    • Thanks: RedpilledAF
  48. Anonymous[121] • Disclaimer says:
    @Realist

    Exactly, they would rather piss and moan. The fact is the Ashkenazi Jews are just smarter than gentiles.

    As Ron Unz himself has pointed out, statistically for every Ashkenazi Jew* with an IQ over 140 there are 40 gentiles with an equivalent or higher IQ. But whatever.

    *Genetically European

    • Agree: Old and Grumpy
    • Replies: @Realist
  49. Utah Tech founder sends mass email even to the Governor of Utah claiming Covid is a Jewish plot to exterminate people with the vaxx.
    Tells people not to get vaxxed. Says Hasidic Jews are the only religious group that has religious exemption, which is true.
    Resigns as Chairman due to bravery.

  50. @Realist

    According to former Jew Gilad Atzman they were doing breeding programs in those ghettos, mating smart people to smart people.

    • Replies: @Realist
    , @Zumbuddi
    , @profnasty
  51. @Realist

    Sad but true.

    • Thanks: Realist
    • Replies: @Caruthers
  52. Avery says:
    @Rich

    {(and electing a black lt governor by the way)}

    Well, would you rather have someone like Winsome, who is 100% gun-supportive, and also supports values of traditional America, or an insane leftist Whitey.
    And No: there are only 2 choices in real life in this case*.

    [Winsome Sears to be Virginia’s first woman of color to serve as Lt Gov]

    ___________________________________
    * I am aware of posters who have hallucinations about deporting all blacks and everybody else who isn’t them back to…….wherever.

    • Replies: @John Johnson
    , @Rich
  53. Realist says:
    @littlewing

    According to former Jew Gilad Atzman they were doing breeding programs in those ghettos, mating smart people to smart people.

    Ohhh no…the humanity. LOL

    • Replies: @RedpilledAF
  54. @Sepp

    Informative — thanks.

    Who is the man in the green sweater?

    Any knowledge whether Louis Brandeis was a Frankist? His family were economic migrants and not religious at all. As Kacey Gunther reports in an important and well-written article, The Zionist Shadows of Woodrow Wilson during World War I Brandeis was highly influential in involving USA in (both) world wars, and also in the Versailles conference.


    The Frankist notion of “inversion” is noteworthy. When Drag Queens and their story hours came to prominence, Tablet magazine wrote of Lil Miss Hot Mess and boasted “yes, she’s very, very Jewish:” https://www.tabletmag.com/scroll/213084/lil-miss-hot-mess-makes-a-great-childrens-storyteller. When asked, “Why read to kids?, Hot Mess/Harris Kornstein replied:

    ““Drag queens and kids are a natural fit, but also transgressive, duh,” she told me. “It’s the final frontier for drag queens! Kids don’t have the baggage of gender . . .”

    (imo Hot Mess/Harris Kornstein is not genuinely transgendered, he’s in it out of the “Jewish revolutionary spirit:” Kornstein, wigs and all, moved from the West Coast to New York to complete a Master’s degree.

    What is the relationship of “Frankist” to “Frankfurt school,” and
    didn’t the Rothschilds start out in Frankfurt (b. 1744, d. 1812;
    Sabbatai Zevi b. 1626 died 50 years later;
    Jacob (Yacov) Frank b. 1726 in Ukraine, died 1791 in Offenbach, Germany, about 6 miles from Frankfurt.


    Let’s hear the whole thing —

    • Replies: @Sepp
    , @Spender_CGB
    , @S
  55. Realist says:
    @Anonymous

    As Ron Unz himself has pointed out, statistically for every Ashkenazi Jew* with an IQ over 140 there are 40 gentiles with an equivalent or higher IQ. But whatever.

    But what Unz didn’t point out was that at higher IQ, Ashkenazis overwhelm the gentiles.

    Also; for every Ashkenazi Jew* with an IQ under 60 there are 40 gentiles with an equivalent or lower IQ.

    Perhaps you can give your explanation of why Ashkenazi Jews outsmart gentiles?

    • Troll: Druid55
    • Replies: @Caruthers
  56. @Realist

    Jews aren’t as a whole that much smarter. A lot of them are just plain stupid despite owning a myriad of degrees. Jews are only as successful as the host society they exploit. They are oblivious to that little fact, hence dumbness. As for the Gentile, they tolerate and at times venerate the Jew because of Jesus. Jews haven’t figured that one out either. Our real problem is our elite who just love a Jewish based usury after their Venetian one died. Even the Catholic elites love and need the usury. Also if it weren’t for the forced conversion by the Roman Catholic Church, who knows how different things would have been. I realize they might have been worse.

    • Replies: @Colin Wright
    , @Realist
  57. @Arthur MacBride

    The quote from Goodhart that I recall from the article gives no support to the idea that Goodhart wrote a Jewish propaganda version of the events in Poland touching the Jews. The author seems to have left it that he had reservations about Goodhart’s views without elaborating. I would be interested to know more.

  58. Oldeyes says:

    Yep Jews created Christianity and definitely manipulated it to influence and manipulate “whites”, and Europeans.
    Christianity makes its followers docile and easily succumb to the Jewish dictates. Think about it. The Bible is all stories. No proof. Updated over the years. To keep its followers obedience under its influence.
    What religion makes its followers pay money to go to heaven or be buried in its cemetery? Why do you need to confess? Yet the popes/priests over the years have committed many cardinal sins? It’s like a corporation. Rules to keep followers in line and in fear of going to hell. I’d say that is exactly how an enemy would crush its victim slowly but surely. Mess with the mind. Best way? Through religion. Christianity and especially the Bible was created exactly for that reason. Everything about it smells of propaganda and manipulation by the Jews who made sure the Christians gave homage to the Jews and to Israel.

    The Bible and Christianity was created to influence and keep in abject terror and obedience it’s followers. Especially in the past The peasants feared the church so did kings and aristocrats. The Church and Pope and Vatican ruled like a god. Christians still worship the pope as a Demi god. It’s all stories made up. Who really knows the truth? If the Jews killed Christ then why is Israel / Jews revered? The Vatican operates like a corporation with churches as branches to keep followers terrorized and in line. The pope has ruled like an emperor (In the past) killing any one who dares disobey. Yet the Jews flourished under this? Hmmm. Makes me wonder who was really in charge.

    The whole “Christianity” thing was created by Jews to manipulate white peoples into subservience and total unquestioning obedience. That is exactly what happened to whites and what is currently happening right now.

    • Replies: @anarchyst
    , @John Johnson
  59. HdC says:
    @anarchyst

    …”The “rot” extends to the seminary system, which openly recruited homosexuals, who would find the Catholic priesthood a good “cover” for their sordid activities. It was called the “lavender lobby” and was responsible for rejecting truly worthy (heterosexual) candidates for the priesthood.”…

    Is there any documentation to substantiate this assertion?

    I’ve always thought that having married priests would improve the breed.

    • Replies: @anon
    , @anarchyst
  60. anon[201] • Disclaimer says:
    @HdC

    Rabbis are married and it doesn’t seem to stop them from peversions.

  61. Anonymous[224] • Disclaimer says:

    Christianity has been the making of the West (arts, culture, science, music, law and literature) but it will also be in the end, the undoing of it via economic slavery.

  62. anarchyst says:
    @HdC

    Yes, there are a number of books on the subject. There is much documentation on the subject.
    Here is a start:

    https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/catholic-expert-details-39huge-homosexual-underground-in-the-church39/

  63. @Wielgus

    Prior to 1919 these Jews did not live in “Poland” and had no vested interest in a Polish state coming into existence. They lived either in the Russian Empire or in the Habsburg Monarchy. Of course German Jews learned German, many Habsburg Jews also saw German as the language of advancement (even if they lived in Galicia). Jews living in Warsaw, Lemberg or Vilnius or even some shtetl in what is now Belarus had no real reason to learn Polish – as the government encouraged Russian and Yiddish was still a very useful language across the region. A lot of the peasants in the eastern half of what became Poland in 1919 spoke Ukrainian/Ruthenian anyway – so if you wanted to rip off the peasants it was more useful to speak Ukrainian than aristocratic Polish.

  64. Hagen places Słomka’s concerns in the context of a wider Polish discourse on a slow national dispossession carried out by Jews.

    Shouldn’t the role of the Habsburg and Russian aristocracy be mentioned in this? To a large extent the dispossession of Poles by Jews in both Empires was actively encouraged and abetted by Imperial elites and bureaucrats who saw Polish nationalism as a threat, and saw Jews as a useful indirect way to limit Polish power without making the State obviously complicit.

  65. Zumbuddi says:
    @littlewing

    ***”mating smart people to smart people.”***

    Didn’t Atzmon say “mating rich girls to smart (in rabbinic terms) boys?

    you know they couldn’t have been worldly smart or they would have run like the wind from a rich Jewish princess.

    That right there is enuf to make you question Jewish smarts.

  66. @Avery

    HEY LOOK AT THIS BLACK CONSERVATIVE WE FOUND

    THAT CHANGES EVERYTHING

    • Agree: Colin Wright
  67. EuroNat says:

    Are we witnessing a contemporary, low intensity “light” version of an agitation atrocity propaganda campaign in the US, in which blacks are being used instead of Jews?

    Protest demonstrations to denounce fabricated EuroAm racism instead of Polish antisemitism? check

    The lying press coloring, suppressing and outright inventing news to demonise EuroAmericans instead of Poles? check

    The coloring, the suppression, and the invention of news, the subornation of newspapers by many different methods, and the poisoning by secret influences of the instruments affecting public opinion, in short all the methods of malevolent propaganda are a menace from which Poland is a notable sufferer. This applies to propaganda both at home and from abroad

    CMV

  68. anarchyst says:
    @Oldeyes

    You are partially correct. However there are some misconceptions that need to be addressed.
    The “Bible” was written by MEN and as such was influenced by the writers and translators. A good example of this is the “King James Version” of the New Testament which, for the first time, codified “the rights of kings and nobles” and ordered subordinates to obey and defend them. This was done to solidify “the rights of kings and nobles” and to remove power from the individual.
    As to your assertion that religious organizations are businesses, you are correct. ANY organization requires shekels to function. That is a normal course of business, even with religious organizations as well.
    Jews infiltrated Christianity when the great Protestant “split” occurred.
    One major change in Protestant doctrine was the acceptance of usury as well as declaring that the inability to make “shekels” was a “moral failing”.
    In Catholic doctrine, one must see to his employees’ well-being by paying his employees a fair and sustainable wage, unlike Protestant doctrine which copies the jewish business scheme of paying your employees as little as possible while amassing great amounts of shekels for yourself. This is how the “captains of industry” made themselves into successes, following the judeo-Protestant “business model” (pseudo-capitalism).
    As to your assertion that Catholics “worship the Pope”, nothing could be further from the truth. Yes, there have been many scandals within the church, some involving popes, but worshiping a church leader is not one of them. Please remember that during the middle ages and before, the pope had temporal authority similar to an emperor and was responsible for those within his realm (countries) on a temporal as well as spiritual basis.
    You are spot-on in your assertion that Christianity and Catholicism have been largely co-opted and taken over by jews. The “Vatican II Ecumenical Council” was a great “coup” that helped destroy much Catholic traditionalism. However, there are Catholics who refuse the changes wrought by this “coup”…
    Best regards,

    • Replies: @emerging majority
  69. So what else is new under the sun? Don’t the Jews act as one? They do. Don’t they promote drunkenness? Don’t they control the flow of money? They do all this, we know it.
    You are preaching to the choir sir, we are aware.
    Tell us something new. Tell us how to fight this menace. Tell us how to fight Albert Bourla, Pfizer and the big media.
    Tell us how to fight this big, mostly harmless cold.

    • Troll: mulga mumblebrain
  70. Rich says:
    @KenH

    Of course, some of the hierarchy covered for their fellow priests. I’m told that in the Rockville Centre Diocese out on Long Island one of the bishops was a homosexual and he brought in a lot of other homosexual priests and lay workers. An acquaintance said he wasn’t allowed to become a deacon there because he expressed opposition to homosexuality, consistent with Church teaching. Once homosexuals get into positions of power in any organization, they tend to bring in others of their inclination and then, other degenerates as they run out of homosexuals. I would guess that a lot of Catholic families pushed their more effeminate sons into the priesthood because of the celibacy requirement. The one guy from my neighborhood who became a priest was a nice guy, but always seemed a little light in the loafers. Having gone to Catholic Schools and Churches my whole life, I’ve still never met a priest accused of pedophilia. Obviously, they’re out there, and anyone convicted of such a crime should get the rack and then be burned at the stake, but I’m of the opinion the issue was pushed to smooth the path for homosexual marriage and other leftist goals. I agree that the rot does need to be cleaned out for the Church to become a bulwark against modernism and degeneracy. Eventually it will, but we could have a long wait.

  71. Rich says:
    @Avery

    Even though you say there are only two choices, I would still choose to have a White candidate who supports gun rights. I’ve never voted for any black candidate in my life, and probably never would. And, believe it or not, there’s a lot of White voters like me. And 99% blacks will vote for a democrat over any black candidate anyway, so nothing is gained pushing black “conservatives”.

    • Replies: @Avery
  72. This article confirms what I have read and even more so, what I experience in Israel at the present time. There is a profound rejectionist psychology based upon an unexamined belief, in fact, what might be called a Jewish doctrine, that prevails in Israel, and I believe, as well as in the Jewish Diaspora, so-called. An article in the Ha’aretz paper – the so-called leading intellectual paper – revealed that according to original sources found in the Israeli archives, there were many genocidal attacks on Arab during the Jewish “War of Independence” of 1947-1949, above and beyond the infamous Deir Yassin massacre in Jerusalem – which was not only carried out by the Irgun and Lehi, the so-called radical, rightists Zionists, but was well supported by the Haganah – the so-called moderate faction of Zionists. Apparently there were members of the governing bodies who had no idea of what was going on, but ultimately Ben-Gurion prevented any serious investigation of the matter.
    The reason this is really important information is that it contradicts the lachrymose, eternal victim narrative of the Jews. Jews not only murdered in cold blood those who were non-combatants, they also murdered those who held up white flags in order to surrender. And there were more than zero rapes. Above all, the pillaging was huge. In other words,many Jews behaved like savages and barbarians and were totally merciless.
    However, just to give one example of the rejectionist psychology. When I mentioned the articl to a Jewish friend, I found myself under a barrage of distraction pointing out what happened to the original inhabitants of the USA – both true and false, with conclusionary remarks that this happens everywhere and there is nothing particularly disturbing about such events.
    Of course, what the rejectionists forget to remember, is that such behaviour has always been attributed to the goyim in their behaviour towards Jews, who have always been the innocent non-violent victims. And it is such propaganda that has formed, and continues to form, the justification for Zionism and a Jewish state in stolen Palestine.
    The problem though, is the Jewish narrative is a lie in most cases – not least of all the Holohoax – and Jews are just as capable, and at times, even more so, of inhuman, savage and barbaric behaviour. The daily murder of a Palestinian continues at this very time.
    Zionism is a colonialist-replacement movement which has never ceased its conquest and it has obviously brought about a resistance, which probably will undermine it as it did in Algeria

  73. @Anonymous

    “…to fill pews vacated by ever-more-deceasing whites.” You missed something there. Something huge. The U.S. currently may have more lapsed Catholics than practicing ones. During the 60’s and 70’s there was a huge change in thinking by the cannabis generations.

    There was a lot more to the hippie movement than beads, sandals and pot, though. Here was one situation that the CIA did not give sufficient prior thought to fully understand. “Acid”, under relaxed rather than anxious conditions was invaluable in clearing engrams from people’s mindsets. It was like a huge broom which swept out a whole bunch of accumulated bullshit, built up over generations where inculcated fears had become the impelling norm.

    Psychedelics of most types, along with cannabis, probably have had the effect of temporarily removing the literalist left-brain blockage of right-brain intuition and universality. I would be one of the first to agree that “too much is too much”. There always seem to be people who get the notion that if one dose is good, then many doses are great. Doesn’t work that way. Roughly the same is true with alcohol. Unfortunately there is such a thing as addictive predispositions. In the instance of alcohol, it tends to be genetic.

    So the deeper element operating in those empty pews in Catholic Churches is the simple fact that a whole generation —and more—came to realize that they didn’t need to be baggaged with those old, imposed fears of hellfire and damnation any more. They were now free to think for themselves and thus got the hell outta Dodge. Even among the Southern Badtist’s, the younger generations are abandoning ship in droves.

    The late, great John Trudell bemoaned the fact that those European immigrants who came to these Turtle Island shores were desperately messed-up. Their tribal sensibilities had been beaten down by fire and sword. In a word they had become deracinated and de-tribalized and were living in an almost totally abstract mindset, with a hatred for the natural world and all of its deeper connexions with our spirits and our souls.

    Monotheistic desert-born organized religions do not belong in a land overflowing with milk and honey. With the Shift, those Piscean Age forms will blow away in the next wind.

  74. profnasty says:
    @littlewing

    Cool handle.
    Quick story.
    The ablum that started my Hendrrix addiction was ‘In the West’.
    The live recording of Little Wing was the best ever rendition.
    It was scrubbed from the ablum under penurios circumstances. For me, it can no longer be found.
    Little Wing was a musical masterpiece.

  75. @Oldeyes

    The whole “Christianity” thing was created by Jews to manipulate white peoples into subservience and total unquestioning obedience. That is exactly what happened to whites and what is currently happening right now.

    Anyone can sit around and bash Christianity but the fact remains that when Whites go secular they adopt liberalism/leftism. This has been true since the 1930s.

    Secular White birth rates are lower than any Christian denomination.

    Whites don’t question the system when they leave Christianity. They convert to liberalism and become urban dog moms. They become even more docile as they put their faith in liberal leaders to create Eden on earth. That becomes the only possible salvation for the Bantu.

    I used to live around secular Whites and I could not believe how many bought into establishment evolution. They really believed that race is just skin color and Bad Whites somewhere must be holding back minorities. If you even asked them to explain establishment evolution you would be risking complete banishment from the tribe. THE SCIENCE HATH SPOKEN. Race doth not exist and Bad Whites must be eliminated from the earth so a utopia can exist. They really think this way.

    Secular Whites that have been around Blacks mostly become liberal racial realists. They accept race but believe the only hope is to intermix everyone to eliminate it. Whites still become the unspoken enemy as their natural advantages are viewed as unfair and holding back equality.

    The Catholic church is the only antidote to the secular left. A secular anti-left movement is only possible through a dictatorship that chases down its enemies and a certain Austrian already soured Europe on that idea. The left is too intertwined within secular realms to defeat it through a voluntary movement.

  76. @KenH

    You overlook the real problem with the Vatican. Hierarchy. It is a huge control mechanism, totally political, utterly bureaucratic and with the flow ever going from the top down. It is essentially a recapitulation of Imperial Rome, simply under the guise of a new, very well organized religion.

    That religion is based, not upon the spiritual messages of Jesus, but on machinations of Saul/Paul, the Pharisee; Eusebius of Caesarea, the Emperor Constantine with his “in hoc signe vinces” (in this sign, conquer) mentality.

    Then along came (“Saint”) Augustine and his Original Sin message that redemption could only be received from the Holy Mother Church crutch. That doctrine is nothing but evil. It buttresses a false religiosity while imposing fear and submission upon the masses of those whose ancestors were forced into becoming believers.

    So the whole edifice is collapsing in on itself. Built upon a house of cards, firmly foundationed on sand, the dying power of the Vatican is to be celebrated by all free souls.

    • Replies: @Oscar Peterson
  77. Petermx says:
    @Peter Akuleyev

    That all sounds right. In addition, German was a much more important language then. If you were going to get an advanced degree in one of the sciences German was a required language.

  78. @anarchyst

    The “Protestant” connexion with usury you proffer has been primarily an affliction of Calvinists. Much of the religious troubles in France, highlighted by the St. Bartholomew Day’s massacre decreed by the Medici-born queen, were all about “haut Societe’ Protestante” (economic differentiation) than about religion per-se. The French Huguenots were mostly Calvinists. Today, they would be regarded as upper middle class. They owned enterprises and presumably banking institutions as well. And as we all know, banks love to charge interest, sometimes at usurious rates.

    We also know that the so-called “Pilgrims” were not refugees who wanted to practice their religion. That was their cover story. As a matter of history those PURITANS were hidebound followers of the Old Testicles and wanted to impose their religious beliefs on the rest of the population. That Calvinist bunch in England highlighted by the evil Oliver Cromwell, whose Roundheads happily murdered Catholics and non-Calvinist Protestants. Check out the first names imposed by their parents upon those “Pilgrim” settlers in Massachusetts. Almost every single one was taken from the Old Testicles. They looked upon themselves as the new “Chosen People” and America as their “Promised Land”.

    Calvinist religion takes its name from John Calvin, a native of Geneva. Though I have yet to do my own research on the matter, I have read that Calvin was a transliteration of Cohen. If that is actually the case, then I rest my case. Similar to Ignatius Loyala, founder of the Jesuit movement, Calvin possessed more than a pair of Levis. His ingrained attitudes were of the Levites.

    • Thanks: anarchyst
  79. Ned kelly says:
    @Realist

    Jews have brutally exploited Jews. Moral depravity is the Jewish forte. Put that together you get: the Zwi Migdal… Of course that was also happening in the USA.
    Another added benefit of hyping the “pogrom” was that it helped get rid of schnorrers… Which was a benefit to the whorer

    • Replies: @Realist
  80. @emerging majority

    So who should celebrate the death of Unitarianism?

    With or without hierarchy, institutional Christianity is in steep decline.

    I’m not inclined to celebrate any of it.

  81. Sepp says:
    @SolontoCroesus

    Tranny inversion is definitely a major part of the playbook of the Hidden Hand of Sabbatean Frankism. It’s all part of the black and white dualism that they parade under our noses and ridicule us with

    [MORE]

    I used to think that it was all just one big show, but in reality it is far worse. It is all one big Sabbatean Frankist Satanic Ritual, and we are unwilling participants in it…https://imgur.com/BYGULYj.pnghttps://imgur.com/fZ2btpa.pnghttps://imgur.com/999XD88.png

    • Replies: @RedpilledAF
  82. S says:
    @Sepp

    I think we can rest assured that the US Revolution was a Sabbatean coup judging by all the hanky panky of Ben Franlin in England and the involvement of Jefferson in the French Revolution. Lafayette, a Freemason, was also involved in both the French and the US revolutions.

    I don’t know enough about the Sabbateans to comment either way, but, yes, Jefferson and Lafayette were both quite involved in the proto-Capitalist American and proto-Communist French revolutions of 1776 and 1789, Lafayette being known during his lifetime as ‘hero of both revolutions’.

    As for Franklin’s purported involvement in laying the groundwork for the French Revolution see the link below. By the way, it was Franklin who in 1774 would help arrange for Thomas Paine to come to the future United States directly from England, Paine being another Founding Father involved in the events of both 1776 and 1789.

    https://www.belcherfoundation.org/trilateral_center.htm

    • Agree: Sepp
    • Replies: @mulga mumblebrain
  83. Kati_uk says:

    Just reading in “200 years together”
    https://archive.org/details/200YearsTogether/

    about the ukraine 1881 spring and summer progromes, it takes a while until people rise up in such ways against other groups like here Jews with their always same business model.

    “The working people cannot withstand the Jewish robbery anymore.
    Wherever one goes, almost everywhere he
    runs into the Jew-Kulak. The Jew owns the taverns and pubs; the Jew rents land from the
    landowners, and then re-rents it at three times higher to the peasant; he buys the wholesale
    yields of crop and engages in usury, and in the process charges such interest rates, that the
    people outright call them “Yiddish *rates+”…”This is our blood!”

    (page 82 of above link)

  84. Mefobills says:

    have never wanted to till the soil, they have preferred to live by their wits, to profit by trading in the lands peasants have had to pay for [in compensation for receiving post-emancipation freeholds].” For the Jews, of course, it was a very successful strategy.

    Taking usury is not “wits” it is collusion. Jews are not that smart, but they are “clever” and scheming.

    The synagogue is used, after worship, as a place for business and collusion. Verbal tradition is passed down in secret.

    If usury were made illegal again, then Synagogues that engage in usurious behavior can be shut down.

    Making things “dear” and hence high priced is not “smart” it is the working of a usury scheme.

    would begin from harvest-time to buy up provisions from the farmers, mostly paying them with vodka: and these they would sell during the hunger period at huge profit.

    An even more advanced usury scheme involving Rum was the Atlantic slave trade. Our (((friends))) use the same schemes over and over, usually with some sort of twist, but the objective is always the same; to have their “capital” work instead of them. Jewish “capital” is to be international and fungible (meaning it has legs and can move). For example, “international capital” bought up to 1/3 of Germany during the hyperinflation.

    Any country that tries to establish sovereign money (money issued by the state), and to legally limit the merchant, comes under attack.

    • Replies: @anarchyst
  85. @SolontoCroesus

    Who is the man in the green sweater?

    David Icke.

    website https://davidicke.com/

    • Thanks: SolontoCroesus
    • Replies: @Sepp
  86. Derer says:

    I feel sadness at present control and manipulation of Slavic masses in Poland and Ukraine by the disloyal Zionists. The general public feelings of anti-antisemitism are kept in closet and suppressed. No different from the US methods where Hanukah is gradually replacing Christmas. Ironically, during the communist tyranny, the same way the anti-communist sentiments were suppressed in those countries. The big difference is communists never promised or claimed living in the fake democracy.

  87. babu says:

    Not real Hebrews – these people are Edomites.

  88. anarchyst says:
    @Dissident Israeli

    Good treatise, but you have left out one important point…
    Every jewish holiday is a celebration of outright genocide against judaism’s “enemies” and of judaism’s “conquests” and destruction of its “enemies”–those who attempt to resist jewish domination and eventual destruction.
    If and when the west’s destruction by the jews occurs, there will also be a celebration–a new jewish holiday to celebrate further conquest and genocide.
    It’s in their blood…

    • Agree: annamaria
    • Replies: @annamaria
  89. Caruthers says:
    @Realist

    For the same reason a Roman Legion defeats a larger collection of disorganized individuals.
    Less than 25% of Fields Medalists are Jews—-the highest IQ class that exists—-despite the ethnic networking in which Jews compulsively engage, and despite their supremacist zeal to excel the goyim,* both of which inflate their numbers relative to their merits.
    Flynn’s latest estimate of the mean Ashkenazi IQ is 107. Moreover, the standard deviation of Ashkenazi IQ’s is likely lower than that for the general population, given their greater homogeneity. Hence, at the very highest levels of intelligence (4 or 5 standard deviations above the general mean), one would not expect Jews to dominate.

    *The lack of goyim to excel is the reason Israeli IQ’s and achievements are far below those of American and European Jews.

    • Replies: @Realist
    , @Pepe the Frog
  90. S says:
    @SolontoCroesus

    Any knowledge whether Louis Brandeis was a Frankist?

    Not the best source, but according to Wiki Brandeis’ parents were both followers of Frank’s daughter, Eve Frank, who led the cult after her father’s death. Louis Brandeis status in that regard isn’t specifically addressed however.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eve_Frank

  91. At a young age, I was taught, “When in Rome, act like a Roman…, not like a viral Virus…

  92. marylou says:
    @Sepp

    “Many have identified “Prohibition” as little more than a Jewish attempt to eliminated their competition from German breweries, many in Millwaukee. Of course the Bronfam family in Canada and many others made fortunes running hard alcohol across the great lakes into the US.”

    What was the end effect of prohibition?

    All the ‘family started and owned’ distilleries, of famous Bourbon and etc, were, voila, suddenly all owned by jews.

    • Agree: Sepp, Fart Blossom
  93. Słomka remarked that most of the land had at one time been in Jewish hands and had only been “bought back with a lot of toil.” The Jews, according to Słomka, “have never wanted to till the soil, they have preferred to live by their wits, to profit by trading in the lands peasants have had to pay for [in compensation for receiving post-emancipation freeholds].” For the Jews, of course, it was a very successful strategy. In the 1860s, Słomka looked on as the prestigious houses ringing the central square of his chief market district, Tarnobrzeg, passed into Jewish hands.

    Poland would be a hell on earth if it were still 30 percent Jewish, as today, unlike in the early 20th century, no criticism of or resistance to Jewish depredations would be allowed. There ought to be a statue of Adolf Hitler in every town in Poland, with “LIBERATOR” on the pedestal. But, of course, that’s not allowed either.

  94. anarchyst says:
    @Mefobills

    Thank you for your incise comment on jewish behavior. I would like to add my experience living through the so-called “civil-rights (for some)” movement of the 1950s and 1960s.
    In the day, us aware whites had a saying:
    “Behind every negro, there is a jew”.
    There is one common denominator–the “elephant in the room” that most people are loathe to name, either out of fear of being called “anti-semitic”, racist, or other derogatory term. I don’t care. Here goes…
    I came of age during the first so-called “civil-rights” movement and saw for myself the underhanded dealings, the demonization of us decent, law-abiding whites, and in general, the deterioration of civil society brought on by jewish “civil-rights workers”.
    Almost all of the “civil-rights” workers and demonstration “handlers” were of one persuasion–New York based leftist communist jews. They cared not one wit about true “civil rights”, but were there to create hate and discontent among their black charges (who were too stupid or naive to see that they were being used to suborn and destroy legitimate government and society–a favorite communist tactic). These New York-based “carpetbaggers” fomented their hate and discontent, only to become future “civil-rights” attorneys, race-hustlers, and America-hating leftist communists.
    The so-called “non-violent civil-rights demonstrations” were anything but “non-violent”. Robberies, rapes, and other criminal acts committed by these “civil-rights” workers and their black charges were common, but never reported, as even the “mainstream media” of the day was “in on the game” and conveniently turned off their cameras during the acts of violence. You see, even then,”creating crises” was a part of the agenda.
    The “beginning of the end” of America and the abolition of true “freedom of association” (but only for whites) was the use of federal troops against white Americans, which, in itself was a violation of “posse comitatus”–the prohibition on the use of federal troops for domestic “law enforcement” purposes.
    War criminal crypto-jew “president” Eisenhower was dead wrong in using American troops for domestic “law enforcement” without being requested by the state’s governor.
    As most whites were (and still are) law-abiding, they (we) were “steamrollered” by the use of federal troops to crush honest dissent. We never recovered from those unconstitutional actions. It was all downhill from there…
    “Freedom of association” was abolished, but only for whites. To this day, “people of color” and even government “civil-rights” agencies declare that only whites are “racist” and that “people of color” cannot be “racist”.
    We are seeing the results of the so-called “civil-rights (for some)” movement, with every “person of color” and their jewish handlers demanding that us whites capitulate to their demands…which are never enough.

  95. @Peter Akuleyev

    They lived either in the Russian Empire or in the Habsburg Monarchy.

    Good point. And for that reason, the Russian “pogroms” were undoubtedly hyped as described above.

    This, courtesy of the UNZ archives, explains part of the motives for the hype and hysteria and what smells like false flags,

    The story of the role of the European money powers and the business sharpers in the delivery of Russia to the Bolsheviks has never been adequately told. It stands as a nightmarish example to the unwary.

    The softening up of Tsarist Russia was preceded by an underhanded struggle of Western European bankers to fasten their talons upon the Russian economy. Whatever the faults of the Tsarist regime, it must be said to its credit that it firmly repulsed the Amsterdam-FrankfortParis-London-Vienna ring of international bankers and family dynasts.

    Bankers’ Blueprint for Ruin
    by Paul Stevens

    The American Mercury, July 1956, pp. 119-126 https://www.unz.com/print/AmMercury-1956jul-00119/

    Didn’t Solzhenitsyn also say something about the “pogroms” being embellishments?

    Here’s another interesting comment from the past that I found by searching Unz articles.

    [MORE]

    Bitter Tantrums and Buried History
    The Current Holocaust Controversy Between Israel and Poland
    MAX DENKEN • MARCH 11, 2018

    https://www.unz.com/article/bitter-tantrums-and-buried-history/?showcomments#comments

    Comment #454. snag says:

    March 14, 2018 at 3:29 pm GMT Kielce ‘massacre’ triggered a mass exodus of Polish Jews to Palestine. Another detail missed in Zionist version is that those so called Kielce massacre ‘perpetrators’ happen to be uneducated suckers that swallowed the provocateur’s hook the sinker and all nine yards of line, most of them got sentenced and executed the same day the went in front of kangaroo court. Next day the Jew owned media around the world were screaming about Kielce instead of Katyn and the first batch of Polish Jews was packing up and on the way to Palestine. False flag operation just like in other countries like Egypt or Iraq.

  96. @Dissident Israeli

    …there were many genocidal attacks on Arab during the Jewish “War of Independence” of 1947-1949, above and beyond the infamous Deir Yassin massacre in Jerusalem …

    If I remember correctly Yuri Avnery was a witness to, or was at least aware of, such things and described them in his columns and in his book, “1948” A Soldier’s Tale.”

    http://uriavnery.com/en/

  97. For centuries, from Vladivostok to Lisbon, from Edinburgh to Istanbul, gentiles have recorded the same complaints against the Jews who lived among them. I rest my case.

  98. as used to be said in peasant Russia (and probably still is)

    “the Jew is coming, so

    tie the cow up securely, and

    make sure your gold fillings are in tight.”

  99. the position of the new Polish state was to tacitly permit the slow exclusion of the Jews from their prior positions of influence while condemning any and all instances of violence.

    Similar to my own position on Jew crit: the absolute necessity of full-scale criticism, but an absolute eschewal of violence. Realistic, fact-based criticism though, which seems in rather short supply compared to the wild “free association” criticism one sees on this site, and whose prevalence is the one factor which prevents me from regarding the charge of “anti-semitism” as completely bogus.

    She simply could not understand the difference and kept on repeating “He was such a fine boy.”

    He jindu nuffin.

  100. Avery says:
    @Rich

    {And 99% blacks will vote for a democrat over any black candidate anyway,}

    Agree.

    Kimberly Klacik (young, elegant black woman) who was pushed by GOP (and Trump) lost massively to loser* Democrat Kweisi Mfume: Black voters voted for Mfume by 40 point margin, even though Klacik very persuasively tied the crime-ridden Baltimore’s problems to Democrats and decades of Democrat rule.

    {, so nothing is gained pushing black “conservatives”.}

    I don’t know if anybody pushed Winsome. As far as I know she ran on her own, and the voters liked her and her message.

    Nevertheless, the exchange was educational (for me).
    Regards.

    ________________________
    * “…He fathered five children with several different women during his difficult teenage years….”

    such a role model for black yutes.

  101. @Rich

    When Napoleon warned the Pope at the time that he intended to destroy the Church the Pope replied “if its bishops and Cardinals have failed to destroy it then you are unlikely to succeed”.

    • Agree: Hibernian
  102. @Peter Akuleyev

    ‘Prior to 1919 these Jews did not live in “Poland” and had no vested interest in a Polish state coming into existence. ‘

    Well, that’s not really fair. Unlike, say, ‘Greece’ or even ‘Italy,’ the Polish state had been very real less than two hundred years before. Moreover, there had been large and conscious Polish national revolts all through the Nineteenth Century.

    It would have been pretty hard for a Jew to be unaware he was in ‘Poland.’ Certainly the place was fuzzy around the edges, and it decidedly didn’t enjoy national sovereignty — but I’d say it was real enough.

    • Replies: @Hibernian
  103. @anarchyst

    ‘…War criminal crypto-jew “president” Eisenhower was dead wrong in using American troops for domestic “law enforcement” without being requested by the state’s governor…’

    I agree with much of the rest of what you wrote — but I have to defend Eisenhower to at least some extent here.

    He tried to stop Brown vs. Board of Education. I once read an account of how he called in the Chief Justice and tried to get him to see that white Southerners did not want their thirteen year old daughters sitting next to two hundred pound black field hands.

    Obviously, from our point of view, Eisenhower hardly fought the good fight — but he wasn’t the arch-fiend you portray him as.

    • Replies: @anarchyst
  104. Mefobills says:
    @anarchyst

    Thank you for your incise comment on jewish behavior. I would like to add my experience living through the so-called “civil-rights (for some)” movement of the 1950s and 1960s.
    In the day, us aware whites had a saying:
    “Behind every negro, there is a jew”.

    I know that people here think, there goes that MEFOBILLS again, talking about usury and money.

    Thing is: Money is the mainspring of history. If you leave it out of account, you become confused.

    Ergo: Our friends and their money manipulations warrant the highest level of scrutiny.

    Many may be aware, but probably not most, that the NAACP was funded into being with Jewish money out of New York. Basically, Jewish banksters funded the movement into being.

    International Jewish capital, usually won at usury, had declared war against Christian America.

    The battle between Booker T. Washington and W.E.B DuBois was a battle between the two Americas, one Christian and the other Jewish.

    Post reconstruction, money came from all over to finance Booker T.’s vision, where the black man was to have the power of green (money), where said green cycled in his own communities. Black colleges were to teach the trades, and blacks were NOT TO AGITATE through the law. The white man was to see the black as a viable economic entity, and then changes in the law would follow. Millions of dollars flowed from Christian sources to fund the building of black colleges and the like to help Booker T. and his vision.

    On the other side was our (((friends))) and their world-view; if it is good for the jew. Recycled usury dollars were used to fund the NAACP, and the objective was a KRITARCHY OF LAW.

    Kritarchy:

    https://forward.com/fast-forward/430169/what-is-a-kritarch-the-term-used-by-a-white-nationalist-website-linked-to/

    The blog post in question referred to American judges as “kritarchs,” as do many other posts on VDARE. The term, used in “a negative tone,” Tabaddor wrote, “is deeply offensive and Anti-Semitic.” The term, she wrote, is a reference to Ancient Israel, and specifically to the period described in the Hebrew Bible’s Book of Judges, when the leaders of the loosely confederated tribes of the people of Israel, who served as the de facto arbiters of law, were called “judges.” Kritís means “judge” in Greek, and the suffix “-arch” means “rule,” so “kritarchy” means “rule of judges.”

    “VDare’s use of the term in a pejorative manner casts Jewish history in a negative light as an Anti-Semitic trope of Jews seeking power and control,” Tabaddor wrote.

    UHHH. Yes. No Shit. If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, it is probably a duck.

    Kritarchy of law, to then defend super-predators, i.e. usurious creditors, funded NAACP, to then use blacks as agents of destruction.

    It was win-win, the Jews could hide behind the blacks and cast themselves as heroes, but meanwhile disenfranchise blacks from the natural order of life. (Blacks were to be perpetual victims, dependent on the tender ministrations of Jewish control.)

  105. Feli says:
    @James J O'Meara

    You need to look up the word pedophile. The priests are gay men.

  106. @Dissident Israeli

    ‘…Zionism is a colonialist-replacement movement which has never ceased its conquest and it has obviously brought about a resistance, which probably will undermine it as it did in Algeria.’

    I would say there are further — and worse — elements.

    For one, Israeli Jews lack a sufficient national identity. The various components of that bloc won’t even let their children go to school together.

    So how to maintain a sense of nationhood? Why, there always has to be be an enemy at the gates.

    …and there always is! First it was Egypt, then Lebanon, then Hamas, and now it’s Iran. Should Iran be reduced to Syrian chaos or Egyptian submission, there’ll just have to be someone else. Turkey?

    Whatever. It’ll never end. It can’t, not if Israel is to endure.

    [MORE]

    For another, the Jews are awful masters. Some are pretty good — like the British in India, or ourselves in the Philippines.

    The Jews are awful. They endlessly bait and provoke, without actually crushing into submission. Worse, they don’t give the Palestinians a way out. In British India, the Indians could assimilate and climb the ladder. In Prussia, ethnic Poles could decide they were Germans in a generation or two. Ask any Central American if he’s Spanish or Indian — but be tactful and don’t show him the results of his DNA test.

    Here too, it can never end. The Jews will never give the Palestinians a tolerable fate. They’re left with no choice but to resist — not because they’re a race of heroes, but simply because the Jews give them no alternative.

    • Agree: anarchyst
    • Replies: @simple mind
  107. @Realist

    Another sayanim Jew appears to spread Talmudism by means of belligerent attacks on Gentiles. Run along Schlomo, you will have better hasbara success in Protestant chat rooms and forums.

    • Replies: @Realist
  108. @Sepp

    Wow…the stuff of nightmares…

  109. anarchyst says:
    @Colin Wright

    Before you give Eisenhower a “pass”, please look up the Rheinwiesenlager death camps where German prisoners of war who were purposely redefined as “disarmed enemy combatants”, were not given food, water or shelter and were forced to forage for anything that was edible. Anyone on the outside who attempted to give food to these unfortunate internees was shot. By defining these captured Germans as “disarmed enemy combatants”, Eisenhower made sure that Geneva Convention protections would not apply to these German internees. Tens of thousands died as a result.
    Nope, I cannot give Eisenhower a “pass” as it was his jewish hatred and vengeance that rendered his decision to murder captured white men.
    Eisenhower was the consummate “paper pusher”, not a real combat veteran like Patton.
    Don’t forget that it was Eisenhower who sent the U S military to Little Rock Arkansas in violation of federal law–posse comitatus.
    Nope, I must vehemently disagree with you about Eisenhower.

    • Agree: Arthur MacBride, HdC
    • Replies: @Colin Wright
  110. mc23 says:
    @Sepp

    Sabbateans? Another rabbit hole on Unz! I’ll start reading.

    • Replies: @Sepp
  111. @Old and Grumpy

    ‘Jews aren’t as a whole that much smarter. A lot of them are just plain stupid despite owning a myriad of degrees. Jews are only as successful as the host society they exploit. They are oblivious to that little fact, hence dumbness…’

    Oh, I don’t know. One has to distinguish between what one would like to be the case, and what is the case.

    Jewish intelligence doesn’t seem to extend to all fields, and the difference isn’t as marked as some Jews seem to assume, but I’d say a good fifth of the people I’ve associated with in my life have been Jews, and yes, on average, they’re noticeably smarter than gentiles.

    Now here’s a hump to get over. Intelligence isn’t the only important human attribute. A lot of the gentiles round here are dumber than posts, but if you’re in a fix and need a hand…

    • Replies: @anarchyst
    , @Realist
  112. @anarchyst

    ‘Before you give Eisenhower a “pass”, please look up the Rheinwiesenlager death camps…’

    We can leave all that aside. I never gave Eisenhower a ‘pass.’

    I merely noted that he wasn’t invariably evil incarnate. It simplifies reality wonderfully if we deal only in absolutes: Colin is moral perfection or he is Jack the Ripper incarnate.

    However, the world isn’t that way. It really isn’t.

    • Agree: Mike Tre
  113. @gotmituns

    ‘For the most part, people know at some level the jews are garbage…’

    I don’t. That’s actually part of the problem.

    I have no problem generalizing about blacks: I think those generalizations are perfectly valid, and they lead to some conclusions I ultimately have no problem with.

    Jews are different. Individually, I can’t really honestly say they’re any worse than any group of non-black gentiles. It’s just the aggregate effect that’s a problem.

    Let’s put it this way. Armenians are a bit clannish, and Poles may have a taste for the sauce, and Irishmen can be difficult — but all these traits can be lived with, and in any case, none of them have managed to get ahold of the steering wheel.

    Jewish traits could be equally tolerable — but they have gotten ahold of the steering wheel. It’s not working.

    • Replies: @Druid55
    , @EuroNat
  114. HKW says:

    Jews are rewriting history to their own advantage.
    Everything else is anti-Semitism.

    No criticism is allowed even rightfully nor self-defense.
    Jewish psedo-historians think they have the right to change history without any consequences.
    https://mjhnyc.org/blog/rewriting-history-politics-of-memory-in-poland/

    • Replies: @mulga mumblebrain
  115. HKW says:

    Grabowski, Gebert & Co. are aware of the Jews who collaborated with the Germans. They included Jewish Judenrat elders who provided the Germans with the names and addresses of the Jews in their jurisdiction which greatly facilitated things for those shipping them off to Auschwitz.
    How about the Ordnungsdienst which Jews called the Jüdische Polizei. They fiercely beat and robbed their fellow-Jews confined to ghettos more mercilessly than the Germans themselves.
    And then there was Żagiew. Known as the Jewish Freedom Guard, a network of Jewish agents in the service of the Gestapo in the General Governorate. They infiltrated the anti-German undergound and tracked down and handed over to the Germans Jews hiding outside the ghetto. The Germans even provided the most loyal agents with firearms.
    Not to mention the Jewish Kapo in the German death camps…
    The moral of the story: war brutalizes everyone. Throughout history, Jews have mainly been vicitms. But given the chance, especially when survival was at stake, they could also become victimisers.

    Jan Peczkis
    Much of the time, Jewish collaborators were not trying to save their lives

    https://www.jewsandpolesdatabase.org/?s=Jewish+collaboration+not+all+choiceless+choices

    • Replies: @Poco
    , @HdC
  116. Realist says:
    @Caruthers

    For the same reason a Roman Legion defeats a larger collection of disorganized individuals.

    You are using the term disorganized individuals to mean less intelligent. One of the signs of intelligence is organization.

    Less than 25% of Fields Medalists are Jews—-the highest IQ class that exists—-despite the ethnic networking in which Jews compulsively engage, and despite their supremacist zeal to excel the goyim,* both of which inflate their numbers relative to their merits.

    But Jews make up only two percent of the population. And many would argue that theoretical physics is the highest IQ class that exists. You are proving my point.

    Moreover, the standard deviation of Ashkenazi IQ’s is likely lower than that for the general population, given their greater homogeneity.

    The term likely means you are guessing.

    • Replies: @Caruthers
  117. anarchyst says:
    @Colin Wright

    It’s not “smarts” or “IQ” that gives jews an advantage over gentile whites, but is their rabid insistence on cultural and social cohesiveness, insularity and nepotism (but only for themselves) that gives them an “advantage”. This same cultural and social cohesiveness that is prized so highly by jewish interests is denied to gentile whites. Jews, to a man will fight to deny this same cultural and social cohesiveness to gentile whites that they themselves enjoy as it is a major part of the jewish purpose–the destruction of gentile white culture, which IS superior to any jewish cultural or social society. If jews did not possess this power, they would most likely be rag merchants, liquor merchants, or furniture merchants–nothing more. As I have previously stated, jewish success is based on cultural and social cohesiveness and insularity–NOT “smarts” or “IQ”. Once enough jews get into a position of power in the work world or education systems, they will hire and promote their own, even bypassing more qualified gentile white candidates.
    Jews have latched on to cultural cohesiveness and nepotism, as it serves their purpose exceedingly well.
    Jews also lack a moral component which tempers evil in every other culture and society. Jews are proud when they are able to take advantage of others of lesser means—especially those who are not jews. Getting away with murder, theft, and other crimes against the “goy” is a critical part of the jewish psyche and is never tempered by guilt.
    At the same time, jews pushed the concept of racial “equality”, (but only for gentile whites), backing it up with “civil-rights” and “equal accommodation” laws which are enforced by governments–but only against whites. These “civil-rights” laws are used as a “battering ram” against gentile whites to diffuse and fragment any semblance of gentile white solidarity and cohesiveness that may arise.
    A great reckoning dealing with the jews is coming. As gentile whites become more marginalized, the accusation of being tagged as “racist” or a “holocaust denier” is rapidly losing its “sting”.
    Increasingly, jews are more wary of being “called out” and recognized as “jews”. One can call a jew a shyster, shylock, bankster, criminal or ne-er-do-well, and it will roll off his back like water off a duck, BUT call a jew a “jew”, and he will recoil in horror, having been “found out”.

    • Replies: @Colin Wright
    , @Mulegino1
  118. Realist says:
    @RedpilledAF

    Run along Schlomo, you will have better hasbara success in Protestant chat rooms and forums.

    I am not Jewish, but Ron Unz is and every one of you anti-Jews are personally insulting him. You better ask yourself why he supports it.

    • Replies: @RedpilledAF
    , @Druid
  119. mc23 says:
    @Mike Tre

    In the late 90’s the seminary in my area had half the staff reassigned because it was so infiltrated with gays, a real lavender mafia and the activities of the staff and their teaching came to the attention of the cardinal.

    I only found out from a friend whose son was there and because of the staffing crisis was sent to a seminary out in Chicago.

    Interestingly enough my father had occasion to meet the Cardinal. My mother told me that he thought the Cardinal was probably gay. It was just an observation, he had nothing bad to say about him. When I asked my mother her opinion she just said my father had always been pretty accurate in his assessments. I don’t believe I ever heard my father say anything about gays.

  120. @Dutch Boy

    That is plainly the tactic of sections of Jewry, but of sections of other societies as well. The blanket attribution of these policies and strategies to ALL Jews is wrong-headed. The Jews need to cease acting in ways that create Judeophobic hatreds, and that will only happen if the Judaic collective feels safe and valued, as a whole, while criminal elements must face justice, as must all exploiters in all groups. What sane, humane, alternative is there?

  121. Realist says:
    @Colin Wright

    Jewish intelligence doesn’t seem to extend to all fields, and the difference isn’t as marked as some Jews seem to assume, but I’d say a good fifth of the people I’ve associated with in my life have been Jews, and yes, on average, they’re noticeably smarter than gentiles.

    That is absolutely correct.

    Now here’s a hump to get over. Intelligence isn’t the only important human attribute. A lot of the gentiles round here are dumber than posts, but if you’re in a fix and need a hand…

    Again you are absolutely correct. The following are very important human attributes, Integrity, intelligence, inquisitiveness, intuitiveness, industriousness and, inventiveness.

    Integrity is at least as important as intelligence….and many lesser intelligent people have it in spades.

    • Replies: @annamaria
  122. geokat62 says:

    Telegram comment posted by Now You Know the Truth:

    Adolf Hitler on Jewish Influences in Migration:

    “The Jew steadily works to ruin women and girls so that he can break down the barriers of blood on an even larger scale. It was the Jews who brought the Blacks to the Rhine. The motive behind this is clear and his intention is always the same. He wants to destroy the hated White race through bastardisation. He continues to bring Blacks in as a flood and force the mixing of races. This corruption puts an end to White culture and political distinction and raises the Jew up to be its masters. A racially pure people, of whom is conscious of its blood, can never be defeated by the Jew. In this world, the Jew can only be the master of bastards. This is why he continually tries to lower the racial quality by poisoning the blood of individuals among the targeted peoples.

    – Mein Kampf (Page 278)

    https://t.me/NSDAPtruth/441

    • Agree: Sepp
  123. JWalters says:
    @Sepp

    A very good post, clearly connecting relevant dots.

    “Now many Jews will claim that there is no proof that it is Jewish gangsters that are doing this.”

    A lot of evidence on the history of this, and tracing the lines of financial control, is presented in the article
    “War Profiteers and Israel’s Bank”
    https://warprofiteerstory.blogspot.com/p/war-profiteers-and-israels-bank.html

  124. @Realist

    Nice deflection hasbara sayanim goon, but your pilpul tactics won’t work with me. And we all know Ron Unz is of Jewish ancestry, however, he does not push a zio-agenda/talmudism like you and a few others do. So, no, we are not insulting him, we are in fact very thankful for what he is doing.

    • Replies: @Realist
  125. @emerging majority

    ‘…those Jews descended from the ancient Hebrews who were deported by Titus and other Roman Emperors during the “troubles” …’

    Stop right there. Those deportations never occurred. Other rulers practiced people-moving — but not the Romans.

    It was a canard invented by late antiquity Christians to bait the Jews. ‘See: God doesn’t love you. He let you be expelled from Palestine.’

    …but it demonstrably didn’t occur. Read Shlomo Sand’s The Invention of the Jewish People, for starters. And I could go on, but only if you ask nicely.

    • Replies: @John Johnson
  126. @anarchyst

    ‘…Jews are proud when they are able to take advantage of others of lesser means—especially those who are not jews…’

    Oh, I dunno. I’ve known some moral Jews, and some fairly moral Jews, and some immoral Jews. They’re not a sinister Borg collective; at least, they don’t mean to be.

    As I say, they have their tendencies — but then, so does every other group I could define. What you lose on the straightaways you make up on the curves. Etc.

    It would all be cool — except they have too much damned influence!

  127. newrouter says:

    “She simply could not understand the difference and kept on repeating “He was such a fine boy.”[”

    How do you say “He didn’t do nothing” in Yiddish?

  128. Mulegino1 says:
    @anarchyst

    Agree 100%.

    The excellent observation of Pierre de Craon on another thread here at UR sums the “Jewish genius” up quite well:

    It is as if the ideal state to which they aspire is that of the butcher who is so clever that no one ever catches him with his thumb on the scale.

    The Jews have always put their “thumb on the scale” with their nepotism, collective hatred for the rest of humanity and their insufferable tribal narcissism. For the Jew qua Jew, the only moral imperative is that “it be good for the Jews.”

    This “most intelligent of all races” has been kicked out of well over a hundred kingdoms, nations, city states, etc., precisely because of its odious behavior towards its hosts. Is this a mark of intelligence? One presumes that if the Jews were such super-intelligent beings, it would have dawned upon most of them by now that they could easily assimilate to the superior high culture of their hosts by casting off their Talmudic antipathy to all things good, noble, beautiful and orderly. But their chronic insistence upon being the bride at every wedding, the corpse at every funeral creates quite the opposite effect, i.e., the corpse who spoils the wedding and the bride who crashes the funeral.

    Organized, collective Jewry is univocally evil and a curse to the human race. The Jewish individual can only escape the accursed lineage of the Pharisees by renouncing the pathological Jewish identity which is rooted in the hateful worldview of the Talmud.

    • Agree: HdC
    • Thanks: anarchyst
  129. Realist says:
    @Old and Grumpy

    Jews aren’t as a whole that much smarter. A lot of them are just plain stupid despite owning a myriad of degrees.

    Here we disagree. All evidence points to Ashkenazi Jews on average are significantly smarter than gentiles.

  130. Realist says:
    @Ned kelly

    Jews have brutally exploited Jews.

    Some Jews have brutally exploited some Jews…that is true.

    Some gentiles have brutally exploited some gentiles…this is also true.

    • Replies: @mulga mumblebrain
  131. Realist says:
    @RedpilledAF

    And we all know Ron Unz is of Jewish ancestry, however, he does not push a zio-agenda/talmudism like you and a few others do.

    Give an example where I push a zio-agenda/talmudism…I don’t know what that means.

    So, no, we are not insulting him, we are in fact very thankful for what he is doing.

    That is bullshit, many here make all-inclusive, vile characterizations about Jews…that includes Ron Unz.

    It appears to me you are just full of shit.

    • Replies: @Caruthers
    , @Druid
  132. annamaria says:
    @anarchyst

    Only in Judaism children are subjected to this atrocious conditioning:

    Haman’s ears, or oznei haman, are a traditional dessert for Purim. There are many Purim sweets that are modeled after Haman’s anatomy or clothing

    From Persia to Spain and Russia, all host countries have become blood enemies of the Talmudists. The prevalence of Jews among the principal activists/mass murderers of the Bolshevik Revolution should have been discussed in great detail, instead of the incessant discussion of the lies-laced holobiz stories.
    Kaganovich, Trotsky, Zalkind, Frenkel, Goloshyokin, Yagoda… they were the eager exterminators of the best and brightest in Russia. The Rothschild house was involved in the slaughterous enterprise of the Bolshevik revolution via its agent Jacob Schiff, an American bankster who personally financed the prominent terrorist Bronestein (Trotsky). Russia suffered from the attacks by the genocidal psychopaths conditioned from early childhood to hate and spit upon non-Jews.
    Not that some non-Jewish specimens like Bush, Blair, Clintons, Obamas, Stoltenberg, et al are better than the genocidal Madeleine Albright, Carl Gershman, Wolfowitz, the Kagans, Feiths, and similar morally handicapped Jews.

    • Thanks: anarchyst
    • Replies: @Anon3210
    , @Anonymous
  133. Anonymous[182] • Disclaimer says:
    @emerging majority

    That was always Satan’s line.

    • Replies: @emerging majority
  134. annamaria says:
    @anarchyst

    “every “person of color” and their jewish handlers”

    — News for New York City: https://turcopolier.com/manhattan-da-gives-many-misdemeanors-a-pass-even-as-new-mayor-vows-to-combat-growing-crime/

    Alvin Bragg, a former federal prosecutor sworn in as Manhattan District Attorney on Jan. 1, sent guidance to his office calling for the “decriminalization/non-prosecution” for crimes including marijuana possession, turnstile jumping, trespassing, resisting arrest, interfering with an arrest and prostitution.”

    Additionally, the guidance says the DA’s office will “not seek carceral sentence other than for homicide” or “class B violent felony in which a deadly weapon causes serious injury, domestic violence felonies” with some exceptions in “extraordinary circumstances.”

    The memo argues that “reserving incarceration for matters involving significant harm will make us safer.” Pretrial detention, according to Bragg’s office, will only be recommended in “very serious cases.”

  135. @Anonymous

    WHAT was always “Satan’s line”? Are you attempting to confuse or are you confused. Explain yourself, please.

  136. annamaria says:
    @Realist

    “Integrity, intelligence…”
    — currently, the most famous darlings of Israel are the late J. Epstein and R. Maxwell (Ján Ludvík Hyman Binyamin Hoch) https://www.veteranstoday.com/2021/12/30/mega-group-maxwells-and-mossad-the-spy-story-at-the-heart-of-the-jeffrey-epstein-scandal/

    Nothing to be proud about.

    Israelis’ average IQ: 95
    https://brainstats.com/en/average-iq/israel

    • Agree: Sepp
    • Troll: Realist
  137. @Caruthers

    I am not sure I can even accept 107.

    Consider that your favorite search engine will obediently recite MINITRU’s statement that the average IQ in Israel is 96. Consider that the Ashkenazi “smart boys” claiming an average IQ of 115 are a small minority of the population, 30% of it and shrinking rapidly as they celebrate their “same sex marriages,” march in the weekly “gay pride” parade in Tel Aviv, and import a vast and growing army of stunted little brown mystery meat–IQ-60 Ethiopian Felashas, IQ-70 Sephardim, and IQ-65 “Palestinians”–to do the stoop labor the (((Tribe))) considers itself too good to do… and that stoop labor apparently includes reproduction. Do the figures yourself. When you calculate the average IQ from that mix, does it come out as 96? No? What figures do you have to put in to get that figure?

    Others have said it. Either they can’t do basic arithmetic, they think we can’t, or their published figure is a brazen display of their contempt for us.

    I have no idea what the real average IQ among the Ashkenazim is. I have no idea what the real average IQ in Israel is. I don’t know what the truth is. But I know that their figures don’t add up. We’re being lied to. That much is clear.

  138. annamaria says:
    @Realist

    “All evidence points…”

    — What are your evidence?

    Jews are admitted to Harvard at 15 times the ratio of equal or better qualified European Americans, and 7.5 times higher than equal or better qualified Asian Americans.

    Here is the word for that phenomenon: Tribalism.
    https://counter-currents.com/2021/07/ashkenazi-iq/

    One common criticism regarding Jewish intelligence claims is that they’re based on studies with a low number of statistical samples. The problem is that a small dataset in a study will result in a larger statistical margin of error. Fewer results mean less statistical confidence. In that case, errors of interpretation can occur, or even deliberate fudging such as cherry-picking. …

    One of the few prominent studies on Ashkenazi IQ that featured a sufficiently representative sample size was conducted by M.E. Backman in 1972… Jews scored an average of 100.8 IQ split between six factors; verbal comprehension, English, mathematics, visual reasoning, perceptual speed and accuracy, and memory.

    Israeli national IQ is 95

    Perhaps what you call “smarter” should be called nepotism, lack of integrity, cheating.

    The main factor is ethnic nepotism, helping their relatives get into lucrative rackets and obtain influence far beyond their numbers in the general population. … Putting a nicer spin on things, Jews help each other and have a high degree of group self-consciousness.

    • Agree: Miro23
    • LOL: Realist
    • Replies: @Realist
    , @simple mind
  139. Hibernian says:
    @emerging majority

    …the religious nuts haunting this site…

    Takes one to know one.

  140. @anarchyst

    Christianity is bad fanfiction of 2nd Century BC Essene Judaism, with all that inconvenient stuff about blood heritage ripped out and egalitarianism stuffed crookedly into the ragged hole it left behind.

    Culturally speaking, I believe that Christianity, as it existed prior to the Second World War, perhaps even prior to the turn of the last century, was a pro-civilizational force. Now, not so much. I am not sure it can be fixed at this point.

    Note that in every study in the US, every poll, by far the most religious people in the US today are blacks, Mexicans, and Puerto Ricans. I cannot help but notice that the Old Rugged Cross sure doesn’t seem to do much to moderate their violent, disorderly animal nature.

  141. Hibernian says:
    @Colin Wright

    Similar to Ireland. (I have connections to both.)

  142. Caruthers says:
    @Realist

    “Disorganized” in this case means “non-ethnocentric”. Unfortunately, the compulsion to fierce inter-generational and international tribal ethnocentrism is not wholly volitional. But if you define tribal ethnocentrism and supremacism and hatred of outsiders as a species of intelligence, then, yes, Jews are far ahead of all other groups in the history of the world in that aspect of intelligence (But in your logic, they were idiots relative to National Socialists and Romans in organization and intelligence during the Hitler and Titus periods, or they wouldn’t have suffered camps and crucifixion. They were also scientific and mathematical imbeciles prior to 1800, without a single accomplished individual). White Nationalists agree with you that those of European descent should focus much more intensely on developing their “organizational” intelligence.
    “Likely” means not mere guessing, but hypothesizing with good reason. Nothing is absolutely certain regarding IQ’s of populations, since not everyone gets tested.
    Fewer than 25% is not dominance; there are still over three times as many goyim in that ultra-elite class as Jews. And zero of the three top chess players in the world are Jews, and zero of the top 50 go players.

    • Thanks: Thomasina
    • Replies: @Realist
  143. @HKW

    Nowadays, and increasingly lately, false accusations of ‘antisemitism’ are proliferating like cane-toads. ANY public figure, even a life-long and notable anti-racist and friend of numerous Jews, ie Jeremy Corbyn, can be destroyed by an Evil campaign of concerted lying and hysteria, the UK Labour Party be destroyed, and it be handed over to a vile Sabbat Goy, Starmer, himself raising his children as Jews. Plainly the Judeofascists and Zionazis are scared, of something or other.

    • Replies: @ivan
  144. Caruthers says:
    @Realist

    Ron Unz is one of the all-to-rare righteous Jews.

    • Agree: anarchyst
    • Replies: @silviosilver
    , @Realist
  145. Anon3210 says:
    @annamaria

    I recall reading an article where Bush stated that his Grandmother was Jewish as the Bush family married into the Jewish Rothschild family in 1865. I can not recall if it was Bush Senior or Preston Bush who stated that. Curious by some chance if someone on this site read that article and recall exactly which Bush was it?

  146. @Rich

    Poland was destroyed as a nation in 2 world wars and enveloped in 50 years of Soviet domination. The plan didn’t work at all, it was just nationalist bigotry. It ended with sabre rattlng and persecution of ethnic Germans (for all the same reasons). Notice that Joyce won’t mention that part, because it would contradict the point he wants to make (Jews Bad).

    Your “strategy” doesn’t work, trying to compete with “groups” for infinite territory is absurd. The problem is always in the possession of land and other things. How does one “swamp the peasants in debt” when debt is meaningless? Who was enforcing these “debt laws” that took anybody’s land? Jews are a symptom not the cause.

    The world is entirely too big for some “group” to block your way in life, there must be some other explanation. America will go the way of Poland eventually without changing the fundamental structure of land use and the relationship of man to nature.

    • Replies: @Rich
  147. @S

    Is there ANY world event that you people do NOT attribute to Jewish machinations. Are the goyim completely incapable of acting without sinister, hidden, Judaic control?

    • Troll: Hangnail Hans
    • Replies: @S
  148. @anarchyst

    Catholicism is Babylonian Heresy

    • Replies: @anarchyst
  149. @Dissident Israeli

    Zionazi barbarity was at least explicable in 1947-8. It came after 3500 years of indoctrination in xenophobic hatred and fear of the goyim, innmerable conflicts, wars and pogroms, suffered by Jews or inflicted on the goyim, decades of conflict in Palestine, and the recent experience of the Nazi Judeocide. But now, 75 years later, the continued barbarity directed at the Palestinians is simply unforgivable and criminal in the highest degree. Yet a Zionazi or Judeofascist will screech abuse and slander at you if you dare sympathise with the Palestinians.

    • Replies: @simple mind
    , @HdC
  150. @Mike Tre

    The Catholic Church is founded on faggotry from the beginning

  151. anon[263] • Disclaimer says:

    n 1985 I was asked to take aboard three foreign visitors to our city as I was checking out my boat at Boston Harbor Sailing Club. I agreed to so as I presumed them to be Englishmen as they spoke perfect Her Majesty’s English with a heavy English accents. Little did I know once we were out of the Boston Harbor that they confided to me they were not English but Israelis. I was surprised and admitted to them as they spoke pure Her Majesty’s English without a Jewish accent. On hearing this from me on of The Israelis advised me that they were Jewish and not English even though they were born, grew up and attended university in England. As we were sailing on the Boston Harbor we got on the topic about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict in the Middle East. The men stated that the whole conflict would not come to be and Jews would not have to forced to resettle in Palestine if the Poles would have only agreed to the creation Judeo-Polonica,Republic a joint homeland for Poles and Jews at the Versailles Peace Conference Talks. When I inquired as to on what grounds they replied that most of the world’s Jewish Population was located in Poland. They went on to state that Jews first settled in the area later called Poland at around the same time as the Jews and have more or less the same rights to their own country in Poland as the Poles. They went on to state that the Poles were anti-semites and did not want to share the country with the Jews who had the same rights to their country as Poles. At one time I wanted to throw them out of the sailboat as there were three of them I wanted to capsize the sailboat but feared that Mark Healy would kill me for ruining his sailboat. I turned the boat around and headed back to the sailing club as fast as the wind could take me after they went on a rant spewing their garbage of a Jewish Polin.

    • Replies: @nokangaroos
    , @silviosilver
  152. S says:
    @mulga mumblebrain

    Huh? Everything said in the entry was about non-Jewish Euros, specifically Anglo-Saxons. The only portion about some Jewish folks was the non-comment about Sabatteans, where I said specifically I didn’t know enough on the subject regarding them to comment either way.

    Also, if you had bothered checking my post history, I’m on record saying there’s plenty of responsibility (as opposed to blame) to share for the present sad state of affairs. As a matter of principle on any issue, if my own (non-Jewish Euros) are significantly involved, even if they are not necessarily the majority of it, I’ll still mention them first, and then others, as that tends to stop blaming a single group for everything, which I don’t think is healthy, as it impinges on self agency and problems being resolved.

    Lastly, who exactly is ‘you people’?

    I ask that as you don’t seem to know anything about me.

  153. ivan says:
    @mulga mumblebrain

    It would be alright if the Jews were just to say they hate you. But with them it is a matter of probation, we are just one step away from being declared antisemites, and thrown to the outer darkness. It doesn’t matter how many tears Corbyn sheds for the Holocaust and blather about the Nazis, but once he had acknowledged that Hizballah can on its own terms be regarded as a legitimate outfit, he became the enemy number one. Mind you I wouldn’t have voted for that Communist, had I the vote, but I don’t see why the fact that the Zionists disapprove of him should have any bearing in the UK elections.

  154. @anon

    That´s an interesting POV, and not altogether incredible;
    it is, after all, the same Galician Jew Altösterreicher now causing
    the troubles in the “Ukraine”.
    Were the Poles “used” at Versailles and St. Germain? I do not get the impression.
    Could they abide the Jews? Hell no.
    Galicia alone would not have been viable (its only exports being syphilis and revolutzers) so they must have had in mind some Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth/”Intermarium”.

  155. Sepp says:
    @mc23

    NXIVM is another coven of Sabbateans. Claire and Sara Bronfam were integral members and financers of the cult. In Yiddish, “Bronfman” means “liquor-man.” The family is Russian Jewish. They are owners of Seagrams Vodka and were running liquor for Meyer Lanskey during Prohibition. The Bronfam’s are also member’s of the Mega Group, and they are also intricately interwoven with Les Wexner, founder of “The Limited”, “Limited Too” and “Victorias Secret”. Wexner was also a ((Pimp)) to underage teenage prostitutes who were leased out to Epstein and Maxwell.

    This Sabbatean Rabbit hole goes really deep. Just consider this:

    Richard Branson and Claire Bronfam on Neckar Island after a wild orgy with underage prostitute NXIVM sex slaves

    Branson is also owner of “Virgin Galactic” and is one of those sciency transhumanist space travelers, likely with deep ties to Masonic Nasa.

  156. Sepp says:

    I think it is worth mentioning the most infamous mass murder in Polish history on this thread about suffering in Poland. No, I am not referring to these fake “Pogroms”, or the fake “Holocaust” at Auschwitz in which the International Red Cross inspected the labor camp and confirmed that there were no gas chambers, masturbation death machines, bicycle powered head bashing machines, steal floored electocution chambers, cages with bears and eagles, or even gas chambers:

    I am referring to Katyn Forest, where Jewish Bolsheviks executed the top echelons of Polish Military and Government. This was just 20 years after this “Polish Pogroms” hoax, and as in their character the Jews lied about what happened and pinned the Katyn massacre on the Germans, who paid dearly for these Jewish lies and typical Jewish projection of their own guilt. This is one good reason why we can be certain that not only were there no “pogroms”, but that everything that happened to the communist Jews in Poland from 1914-20 was well deserved.

    The old Russian Proverb goes “The Jew will always tell you what happened to him, but he will never tell you why”. The veracity of this proverb can be discerned by the kvetching of the old Jewish woman about her son the communist terrorist who “was such a good boy”.

    The Talmud says “”Even the best of the ‘goyim’ should all be killed.” (Soferim 15)”. This is precisely what happened at Katyn Forest. The Jews, on the other hand, always send out their worst to suffer for the sins of the “best” of Judea. This is why the Zionists forced Germany in the Havarra agreements to only to send the “best Jews” to Palestine, and forced Germany to deal with their remaining, self-proclaimed, “subhuman” Jews.

    • Thanks: annamaria, Thomasina
    • Replies: @DrWatson
  157. EuroNat says:
    @Realist

    Blaming the weakness and moral depravity of White gentiles on Jews is a losing tactic.

    Jews have been moaning about Christian “persecution” and “irrational” hatred ie anti Jewish behaviour forever.

    And it has worked for them like a charm. Now you claim that pointing out anti-Christian and anti-EuroAmerican behaviour is a losing tactic. What is then a winning tactic if you cannot rail your tribe (Christian Euro Americans) against a competing one (Jews)?

    How would Jews fight white antisemitism without pointing out mostly invented attacks and invented “unfair” and “irrational” criticism? Mind you, I say invented because the attacks turned out to be hoaxes, and the rare criticism is mostly deserved.

    The more I read your comments the more I believe you are here shilling for Judea. Your contributions so far on the JQ in a nutshell:

    1. But Jews are smarter (meritocratic fallacy, ie not their fault you Gentiles are dumb as dirt)

    2. But many bad people among Gentiles also (classic nothing to see here, no visible patterns of Jewish misbehaviour)

    3. It is a leftist/Democrat problem, not a Jewish one (again nothing to see here, 2 Jews 3 opinions, plenty of Jewish activism against immigration and defending European ethnic nationalism I guess? 50/50 right? )

    4. Better stop voting, white right wingers (bad advice, be more politically passive?)

    5. You white Christians only piss and moan (better spring into “action” then? what kind of action, violent? stop talking and start shooting? is this a call to armed uprising ie become the White Supremacist terrorist threat white Euro American enemies are transparently trying to manufacture? horrible advice again. This is FBI provocateur level of shilling, or very dimwitted activism.

    I think you are just some new type of federal/ADL/Christian Zionist shill fighting “antisemitism” on internet forums. Or it could also be you simply are a dimwit. But your contributions on the JQ are consistently good for the Jews, this is clear to anyone bothering to check your comment history.

  158. @anon

    Actually, that was hardly an unreasonable demand. There were enough Jews in the region and they had lived there long enough that makes it perfectly good sense that, in age of nationalism, they figured they deserved a territory of their own. And if the Poles, Ukrainians etc wanted Jews out their hair as much as possible, a territorial division could make it happen. Of course, no one wants to give up territory – least of all a nationalist – yet the fact is all nationalists in that region eventually had to settle for less territory than their maximal demands anyway.

    • Replies: @Druid
  159. @Caruthers

    Despite my disagreements with him, I too regard him as one of the few righteous among the Hebrews. (Still don’t trust him though, lol.)

  160. @anarchyst

    Your ignorance of history, papist, is amusing. Usury was effectively legal centuries before the Reformation.
    And a common complaint was bishops defending Jews from Christians, no matter what they had done.

    • Agree: simple mind
    • Replies: @anarchyst
    , @Towey
  161. Anonymous[124] • Disclaimer says:
    @annamaria

    Haman’s ears, or oznei haman, are a traditional dessert for Purim…modeled after Haman’s anatomy or clothing

    On the other hand, think of all the nuremburgers roasted in Auschwitz ovens!

    And bubbe-puddings boiled at the Treblinka Hotel.

    Plus yenta-cakes topped with sizzling Sobibor Sauce.

    And judenfillings added to Babi Yar’s hole-istic delights.

    Zionists never stop until finally stopped by goyim. They never back off ’til their goose gets nuked.

  162. Realist says:
    @Caruthers

    Ron Unz is one of the all-to-rare righteous Jews.

    Because he allows vile personal attacks against himself?

    • Replies: @Caruthers
  163. Rich says:
    @simple mind

    Poland wasn’t “destroyed as a nation” because its people worked together to regain control of their nation. They lost a lot of people and suffered greatly in WW2 because they had the bad fortune of being positioned between two hostile superpowers. They should have spent more time building up their military and it might have been in their best interest, though very difficult, to have just given Germans their Danzig Corridor, buying themselves more time. And who on earth thought the French would be defeated so quickly? If the French military hadn’t grown so incompetent and weak, the Germans would have been defeated and WW2 avoided.

    You don’t make too clear your belief in “infinite land” and debt being “meaningless”. Sounds a bit Utopian and not based in reality. There actually is a finite amount of land and if you’ve ever gotten yourself into debt, or had family members or friends who have, you’d know that being indebted is quite meaningful. To the point that strong men have killed themselves over it.

  164. Realist says:
    @annamaria

    There are many reputable studies…Google them yourself.

    Stop conflating the term Jew and Ashkenazi Jews.

    • Replies: @annamaria
  165. @mulga mumblebrain

    There are no “Palestinians”, just ghetto dindoos that migrated into the UNRWA system and now the EU funded “Palestinian Authority”. It will vanish like bad air the moment the funding is cut off. These peopl have to be held in check and don’t belong there.

    • Troll: Hangnail Hans
    • Replies: @Caruthers
  166. Realist says:
    @Caruthers

    As hard as it is for you to accept…Ashkenazi Jews are on average significantly smarter than gentiles.

    • Replies: @Caruthers
  167. @Dissident Israeli

    There was nothing to “replace”. Palestine was invented by Europeans, and barely populated 150 years ago. No Arab has anything a Jew could possibly want, so nothing was “stolen” either. Unless you call moving rocks out of fields “stealing”.

    The white man didn’t “steal” America either, stop the desperate join, it won’t work.

    Zionism is a colonialist-replacement movement which has never ceased its conquest and it has obviously brought about a resistance, which probably will undermine it as it did in Algeria

    Except Jews are native to the region and look like Arabs. Now that the French are long gone from Algeria, why did so many Algerians chase them into France? It’s ARABISM that is the replacement movement which has never ceased its conquest and is now conquering Europe.

    It’s amazing that a tiny sliver of land at the edge of the Mediterranean is called “conquest”… you have very little idea what conquest looks like. You think way too highly of yourself to carry this badge.

  168. @Colin Wright

    “Palestinians” are the forward wedge of a vast Muslim Arab “race” with hundreds of millions of people. Indians could not “assimilate” and did not need to “assimilate”, there were a few thousand British administrators in the entire continent and most Injuns never saw a white man their entire lives.

    Palestinian Arabs much like Algerian Arabs have sought out their “oppressors” by migrating in droves to get closer, and the Israelis are doing the best they can in a difficult situation. There is no comparison in any of the nearly random examples you gave, Palestinian Arabs were not “conquered” or forced into “submission” by anyone, most of the population migrated there in the last 100 years.

    There are thousands of places far worse than “Palestine” on the earth but in your mind it’s been amplified to something completely unreal, when it is of literally no importance.

    • Disagree: Colin Wright
  169. Caruthers says:
    @Realist

    Because he places truth and fairness above tribalism. Where have I personally attacked him?

    • Replies: @Realist
  170. Poco says:
    @HKW

    They have mostly been the victimizers who cry victim when others get sick of their machinations and do something about them.
    This goes all the way back to the Romans who retaliated for their murderous ways.

  171. Avery says:
    @Rich

    { If the French military hadn’t grown so incompetent and weak, …}

    Before the defeat, France had the same number of divisions as the attacking Nazi Germany.
    France had same number of tanks, but newer, better.
    France had more artillery pieces/guns.
    I don’t know about their competence/incompetence, but French military wasn’t weak at all, judging by the military equipment they had.

    Their incompetence perhaps lay in their belief that German panzers could not possibly attack through Belgian forests*.

    {…the Germans would have been defeated and WW2 avoided.}

    I don’t know.
    Wehrmacht at that time was a rung or two above all other militaries.
    It took the massive Red Army 4-5 years of fierce fighting in titanic battles to finally break the mighty Wehrmacht.

    For sure, there was a lot of incompetence on the part of Red Army in the beginning, particularly Stalin’s indecisions and/or wrong decisions.
    But the Wehrmacht was really, really good.
    They reached within 50 miles of Moscow.
    They reached deep into SU all the way to Stalingrad.
    I highly doubt French could have defeated Nazi Germany on their own.

    {to have just given Germans their Danzig Corridor, buying themselves more time}

    Hitler would have invaded Poland just the same.
    His ultimate goal was the rich, fertile Slavic lands of Western SU: Poland was just in the way.

    ________________________________________
    * contrary to popular belief, the Maginot Line worked as planned: Germans figured it would take too long and would be too costly to breach it.

    • Agree: Miro23
  172. DrWatson says:
    @Sepp

    What I find curious is the fact that while the goyim exterminating Jews is called ‘pogrom’, we have no word for the opposite, i.e. when Jews kill the goyim.

    Why don’t we make up such a word? It could be called ‘gogrom‘.

    Or, if you have a better suggestion, please, tell.

  173. @Rich

    Poland wasn’t “destroyed as a nation” because its people worked together to regain control of their nation.

    They never lost control of something that doesn’t exist in the first place. The planet earth consists of mostly empty space, forests, rivers, trees and squirrels. Every sit alone somewhere outside? Were you being oppressed like a Monty Python character?

    They lost a lot of people and suffered greatly in WW2 because they had the bad fortune of being positioned between two hostile superpowers.

    They had the bad fortune to be Polish and therefore stupid and ignorant, driven by nationalist bigotry and insane demands against everyone else.

    They should have spent more time building up their military

    You think they “wasted” some time on other pursuits? What you see is what you get, that’s the best they could put together. Chasing after “Jews” and other ghosts has got to be among the bigger wastes of time when the history of Poland shows it was strongest when gaining the support of the largest number of people (the Polish Lithuanian Jewish German Commonwealth)

    And who on earth thought the French would be defeated so quickly?

    Anybody who was paying attention

    If the French military hadn’t grown so incompetent and weak, the Germans would have been defeated and WW2 avoided

    They were neither weak nor incompetent, just not interested in this war. Why should they be? Who wants to die for Danzig? Poland is not even a real country.

    • Replies: @Dube
    , @Rich
  174. @Rich

    There is effectively “infinite land” and nobody ran out of land in Poland, ever.

    There is no such thing as “getting into debt”, it’s not a malevolent force that just hovers over the world. What is it made of? Strong nuclear forces? Electromagnetism? Rocks? Bacteria? This is the foundation of all hysteria, weird unearthly fears about nothing.

    Strong men don’t kill themselves, much less over “debt”. This is the unstated premise here, I’d like to know how anyone was ever enserfed to “debt” or lost their land without a government that actually enforced this conclusion on some very different basis.

    Today in America (and elsewhere) between bankruptcy, time bars, waiver, write offs, exemptions and inertia (besides litigation) “debt” has very little meaning at all. How was it different in Poland but “ethnic networking” was something real? People striving to get ahead and improve their lives is called “normal”, it doesn’t require boogeymen.

  175. Realist says:
    @EuroNat

    Jews have been moaning about Christian “persecution” and “irrational” hatred ie anti Jewish behaviour forever.

    And it has worked for them like a charm. Now you claim that pointing out anti-Christian and anti-EuroAmerican behaviour is a losing tactic. What is then a winning tactic if you cannot rail your tribe (Christian Euro Americans) against a competing one (Jews)?

    You are bringing religion into the conversation. I never mentioned religion I have confined my comments to Ashkenazi Jews and gentiles.

    But your contributions on the JQ are consistently good for the Jews, this is clear to anyone bothering to check your comment history.

    You know nothing about my comment history…you have posted thirty-six comments here.

    Your intense psychotic hatred of Jews has impeded your ability to accept that Ashkenazi Jews are significantly smarter than gentiles, on average.

    • Replies: @anon
  176. Caruthers says:
    @Realist

    This repeated assertion addresses none of the points made heretofore by me or others. The evidence for greater Ashkenazi intelligence pales before the overwhelming evidence for greater Ashkenazi ethnocentrism and tribalism.
    Nor does your assertion alter the fact that, assuming a normal distribution, there are between 1.75 BILLION and 2.24 BILLION gentiles who are brighter than the average Ashkenazi Jew (1.75 if Ashkenazi Jews have a mean IQ of 110, the figure generally cited by Judeophiles, and 2.24 if Ashkenazi Jews have a mean IQ of 107, as claimed by Flynn).
    Nor does your assertion alter the facts that ALL of the top 3 chess players and ALL of top 50 go players in world today are gentiles, and that 75% of all Fields Medalists are gentiles, and that therefore, Ashkenazi Jews are NOT “overwhelming” in any of these highest of all intelligence categories—-as hard as that may be for you to acknowledge and face. Nor does it alter the fact that 0 mathematicians, composers, scientists, etc., prior to 1800 were Jews of any kind.
    Nor does it alter the fact that IQ scores and intellectual achievements among Ashkenazi Jews in Israel are not very impressive, and that, as the non-supremacist Ron Unz has observed, IQ and other measures of intelligence are not nearly as fixed and immutable as is often alleged.
    As hard as it may be for you to admit, the extent and relevance the (probable) marginally greater AVERAGE intelligence of Ashkenazi Jews relative to all the various groups of gentiles is grossly exaggerated. In every field—-mathematics, music, chess, go, even money-making——the best gentiles are every bit the equal of the very best Ashkenazi Jews.
    Finally, the average intelligence of all high school and community college teachers is probably higher than that of Ashkenazi Jews, as hard as that virtual certainty may be for you to admit. Yet they don’t adopt a supremacist ideology.

    • Agree: annamaria
    • Replies: @Realist
    , @simple mind
  177. @EuroNat

    There is no “tribe” called white European Christians, you are comparing an ocean with some particular fish that is mostly a delusional fantasy in your mind.

    The development of constitutional democracy and human rights was the “winning tactic”: free markets, economic and personal liberty, the dissolution of feudalism.

    A winning tactic for the future will be the abolition of capitalist property fictions and recovering the relationship with the wild environment. Learn to work with nature instead of “against”. Harnessing the implosive force instead of explosive.

  178. Realist says:
    @Caruthers

    Where have I personally attacked him?

    I didn’t say you did but many on this blog have.

  179. anarchyst says:
    @simple mind

    Actually judaism is babylonian heresy. Christianity was perverted by judaic infiltration…

    • Agree: nokangaroos
    • Replies: @simple mind
  180. Caruthers says:
    @simple mind

    Good idea: cut off ALL external funding to both Israel and Palestinian groups. Perhaps an embargo or blockade would be better.

    • Replies: @simple mind
  181. anarchyst says:
    @Redneck farmer

    Your dull-witted Baptist hatred of Catholicism is showing. Read any good “Jack Chick” publications lately?
    Prayers for your redemption…

  182. Realist says:
    @Caruthers

    Your goofy opinions do not constitute facts.

  183. annamaria says:
    @Realist

    “Stop conflating the term Jew and Ashkenazi Jews.”

    – Is not this demand slightly antisemitic?

    There is nothing interesting about Jewish History. Actually, there are no great Jewish artistic and scientific achievements independent of real civilizations such as Persian, the Ottoman empire’s, and European civilization. People would pay zero attention to Jewish virtues and vices if not the Jews’ constant loud quetching and squealing about special Jewish morality, superiority, exceptionally, victimhood, and ‘antisemitism.’

    Enough already. It’s tragic for the perfidious ADL (created in memory of the rapist and murderer Leo Frank) and other Friends of Israel that the internet made available the irrefutable facts of subhuman cruelty and obnoxious disregard to human life shown by Jews in their host countries. Russia is the most recent example.

    Lazar Kaganovich was the closest comrade of Stalin; Kaganovich was directly involved in Holodomor in Ukraine when some 6-8 million innocent civilians died. Rozalia Zalkind arranged a mass slaughter of officer corps in Crimea. Naftali Frenkel was instrumental in organizing the concentration camps (the real death camps) in the USSR, and Shaya Itsikovich Goloshyokin immortalized his name by the Goloschyokin Genocide in Kazakhstan when 40% of the Kazakh civilian population died under his command. Jewish commissars unleashed terror against Russian priests, officer corps, nobility. Unlike Wiesel’s lies about the ‘holocaust,’ the Jewish atrocities in Russia were real.

    Today, it is the US that is experiencing the results of PNAC, Oded Yinon plan for Eretz Israel, AIPAC’s corrosive influence in congress, and the policy of weeding out the real patriots of the US from the commanding positions in congress and the military.

    What’s the point of your boasting about the special smarts of Ashkenazi Jews? Asian people are more intelligent en masse. Italians are more passionate about the arts. Germans are deeper thinkers. Russians are known for their soul-searching. Jews are known for nepotism, petty arrogance, and whining. Sure there have been wonderful, great Jews, but they do not decide the up-to-date face of the tribe.

    • Agree: Miro23
    • Replies: @simple mind
    , @Realist
  184. Caruthers says:
    @Old and Grumpy

    Best to emphasize both the supremacist hostility and double-standards of elite Jews AND the moral weakness and excessive, benevolent gullibility of too many Gentiles.

  185. HdC says:
    @HKW

    “…Throughout history, Jews have mainly been vicitms. …”

    If they were, I submit that this was a direct result of their own actions.

    One thing I have noticed about Israel and the the USA. Their governments are unable to reflect on their actions and muse “hmmm, that didn’t work so well, we need a different plan”.

    No, they steam roller ahead using the same old same old expecting different results. Methinks Einstein had something to say about this: It’s a sign of insanity.

    Unless the ultimate aim is to fleece the USA population and enrich the weapons manufacturers. Then it makes perfect sense.

    It would be interesting to determine the share ownership of these weapons manufacturers by USA senators and representatives.

    • Replies: @simple mind
    , @Mevashir
  186. HdC says:
    @mulga mumblebrain

    “…recent experience of the Nazi Judeocide. …”

    Not according to the Israeli media, which, in the early 2000’s, wrote that about 1,000,000 holocaust survivors were still living.

    It is a straight forward calculation, using publicly available statistics, (life insurance actuarial types are really good at this), to show that 5 million survivors were necessary for 1 million to be alive approx. 55 years later.

  187. @anarchyst

    Christianity was perverted by Samaritan infiltration because the first “Peter” was Simon Magus the Samaritan. All Roman Catholicism is historically Babylonian, the cult was transferred wholesale into Rome and morphed into the state religion. Nothing against basic catholic values, family values etc… looking back I see now they were right!

  188. @HdC

    The words are meant to be understood by expression, but there is no good reason to pay attention either way. I have never understood this morbid obsession with Jews

    • Replies: @Caruthers
  189. @HdC

    The Israeli government seems to be working very well, their nation is building up consistently for the last 100 + years. They are mapping it out and will survive the downfall of the West. Trying to compare that sliver of land with the USA (a vast continental federation of 50 States) is absurd.

    • Replies: @anarchyst
    , @HdC
    , @annamaria
  190. @HdC

    Well yes – in the areas under German control some 2.5 million Jews lived,
    of which roughly 1.5 million fled in time; of the rest, 6 million were gassed,
    and two field marshals, 15 generals, at least 22 bearers of the oak leaves and
    75,000 men fought on the German side.
    The discrepancy stems from the way “survivors” are counted –
    if you spent the entire war in London writing anti-German hate screeds you
    are a holocaust survivor and entitled to a pension.

  191. Miro23 says:
    @DrWatson

    Po – grom (After destruction)

    Da – grom (Before destruction)

    Along the lines that the West is getting the Jewish dagrom (wokeness, antifa, BLM, Patriot Act, media demonization of whites + subversion of Congress and the legal system – prior to destruction).

  192. @HdC

    Also Jewish population figs before/after WW2 —

    From the Jewish World Almanac’

    Jewish world population 1933: 15,315,859
    Jewish world population 1938: 15,748,091
    Jewish world population 1948: 15,753,638

    Jewish population in Germany 1938: 210,000

    https://historicaltribune.wordpress.com/2016/09/24/jewish-population-increases-from-before-to-after-wwii-15748091-15753638-∼-jewish-world-almanac/

    And in more detail re Camps/governance (e.g. Theresienstadt as a Jew-only camp), ICRC parcels, death figs, Romania, Slovakia etc.
    E.g. ” … Not only did large numbers of the three million or so European Jews avoid internment altogether, but the emigration of Jews continued throughout the war, generally by way of Hungary, Rumania and Turkey … ”

    https://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=85432

    • Replies: @Patrick McNally
  193. anarchyst says:
    @simple mind

    Disagree…
    It is the USA that is propping up israel.
    If the USA goes, israel will be (radioactive) toast.

    • Replies: @simple mind
  194. HdC says:
    @simple mind

    I did not compare the two; as you state that would be absurd. I merely gave two current examples, under discussion here, that carry on with apparent insanity.

  195. @annamaria

    There is nothing interesting about Jewish History

    And yet nobody can seem to stop talking about it, especially you. All of those empires and civilisations were inhabited by numerous peoples and cultures, including the many variations on “Jewish”. Ever hear of the Bible? A minor detail

    Nothing from 3000 years ago looked anything like it does today or even yesterday, so all these comparisons are inane and trifling. None of the current formulations existed before 1000 years ago, people are not wandering the globe in perfectly formed “groups” that stay unchanged for millennia.

    • Replies: @annamaria
  196. @anarchyst

    If the USA goes, it will take down the entire world system at the same time.

  197. @Caruthers

    the average intelligence of all high school and community college teachers is probably higher than that of Ashkenazi Jews

    the average high school or community college teacher is dumber than a box of hammers

  198. geokat62 says:

    Telegram comment posted by Gab:

    The Forward, an explicitly Jewish publication, is mad that Gab, an explicitly Christian organization, exists.

    Too bad!

    https://forward.com/culture/480431/gab-january-6-christian-extremism-antisemitism-insurrection-capitol/

    https://t.me/gabtrends/6142

    • LOL: chris
  199. @annamaria

    There is zero “nepotism” involved with admission to universities, why on earth would anyone care and how would it happen? You think the admissions officers are looking for Jewish candidates?? Are worthy applicants getting rejected because of affirmative action quotas?

    Jews are admitted to Harvard at 15 times the ratio of equal or better qualified European Americans, and 7.5 times higher than equal or better qualified Asian Americans

    What makes you think anyone else was “equal or better qualified”, or doesn’t have something much better to do in life than waste time with more skool skool skool? I think you can attend MIT online virtually free if you wish.

    https://www.collegetransitions.com/blog/colleges-with-the-best-jewish-life

    In 2021, Jewish students are well-represented at all eight Ivy League schools. In fact, by percentage, Columbia leads the way at 24%, followed by Brown (19%), Cornell (17%), UPenn (17%), and Yale (13%). Turning to highly selective, non-Ivies, other than Yeshiva, which is 100% Jewish, schools with the highest percentage of undergraduate Jewish students include Brandeis (34%), Barnard (32%), Tulane (37%) and Sarah Lawrence (28%).

    This corresponds with the population itself, let’s say that “20% of the high end university pool are ethnically Jewish”. It’s probably twice that number because “Jewish” is neither ethnicity by itself, nor is it possible actually count people that way.

    If 13% of all dentists are Jewish, it’s because 13% of all dentally inclined people are Jewish. Feel free to practice dentistry, Judaism, the law profession, start a business, or do whatever you wish. You are comparing spaghetti and penguins

    • Replies: @annamaria
    , @chris
    , @anon
  200. @Caruthers

    There IS no “external funding” to the Israeli side: all their funding is internal to real wishes, ambition, interest or concern. That’s what makes the conflict so intractable, because it is literally one-sided. Arabs have NO “internal” anything, being an undifferentiated mass of 3rd world dindoos.

    None of it exists outside the imagination of somebody white, doing white things somewhere else. THIS is the difference between our “sides”: Israelis are organically present and authentic from ground up (literally built their own country), while “Palestinians” were contrived and artificial from the get-go.

    The difference should be obvious looking at Israeli lifestyle, and what the 3rd world Ork imitation dissembles. Everything about these people is “we too are also very important look at us” and endless fairy tales about “Palestine”, all of it long after the fact and relentlessly propagated through school, media and religion.

    Their whole identity had to be invented backwards, pumped up with int’l support and oil money, besides supplying the vocabulary. It’s a desert mirage like flying carpets and oriental genies, which is true organic spirit of their race. Peak year 1000 AD, little since.

  201. Realist says:
    @annamaria

    What’s the point of your boasting about the special smarts of Ashkenazi Jews?

    I’m not boasting…I’m not Jewish.

    Just stating facts.

    • Troll: Hangnail Hans
  202. Caruthers says:
    @simple mind

    Read Grant Smith’s superbly documented books about the obscene amount of money that flows from U.S. taxpayers to the Jewish state.

    • Replies: @simple mind
  203. Dube says:
    @simple mind

    They had the bad fortune to be Polish and therefore stupid and ignorant, driven by nationalist bigotry and insane demands against everyone else.

    That’s not simple; it’s complex.

    Poland is not even a real country.

    How simple!

  204. Lex says:

    Important factor in spreading alcoholism among Polish peasants:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Propination_laws

    These laws usually included:

    peasants were not allowed to purchase any alcohol not produced in their owner’s distillery

    alternatively, they could be allowed to brew their own drinks but had to pay a fee according to the amount produced

    peasants had to buy at least a given quota of vodka or okovita. Those who didn’t comply had the remaining amount dumped in front of their houses and had to pay the costs.

  205. Lex says:

    And here are Jews exerting pressure on US diplomat Hugh S. Gibson:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hugh_S._Gibson

    [MORE]

    Still, as would appear shortly thereafter, a number of acts of violence against Jews had indeed occurred in between 200 and 300 instances, according to Henry Morgenthau Sr.’s report.[18]

    In Gibson’s view, however, not all of these acts could be construed as anti-Semitic in intent since some had occurred on the volatile frontline of the Soviet-Polish War, and a number of Jews had rightly or wrongly been perceived as snipers or sympathizers of the Bolsheviks.[19] Other incidents occurred during the course of food riots (as in Częstochowa), and it appears that an even larger number of Christian shops had also been ransacked. Finally, a number of cases of violence against Jews were imputable to young (mainly American) soldiers of the Haller Army over which the Polish government had no direct control, but the military authorities in due course meted out punishment on the soldiers concerned.[20]

    Gibson believed that Polish anti-Semitism had largely been a product of the Imperial regimes, which “aroused and maintained public feeling against the Jews as part of the system of dominating through internal dissension.” The regimes had been overthrown, to be sure, but had left a poisoned inheritance of mutual resentment and hatred.

    Whatever the case, prominent American Zionists[21] took both notice and action. The Zionists then represented only a small percentage of American Jews,[22] but remembering, like all other Jews stemming from Central Europe, the 19th-century history of pogroms in areas controlled by Russia and assuming that the recent incidents represented a deliberate attempt to reduce the Jewish population of Poland through massacre, they were determined to hold the fledgling (barely two months old) Polish state responsible. That explained their presence in Paris during the Peace Conference and the fact that Felix Frankfurter (later Associate Justice of the US Supreme Court) wrote to Woodrow Wilson (May 22, 1919) that “the Polish Government must be bullied and browbeaten into quitting its policy of extermination and persecution.”[23]

    Gibson, who was already well acquainted with the leaders of the Polish government, did not believe that any such sinister policy existed and took this view in his reports. His “skeptical reports to the State Department… came to the attention of [Supreme Court Justice] Louis Brandeis. On 14 June 1919, Gibson was called by Colonel Edward House to a meeting with the justice and his protégé, Felix Frankfurter. Gibson was at a disadvantage because of Brandeis’s status but also because his appointment as ambassador to Poland had yet to be confirmed by the US Senate. In Gibson’s words, both Zionists opened what the young diplomat later called the “prosecution” by saying “I had done more mischief to the Jewish race than anyone who had lived in the last century. They said… that my reports on the Jewish question had gone around the world and had undone their work…. They finally said that I had stated that the stories of excesses against the Jews were exaggerated, to which I replied that they certainly were and I should think any Jew would be glad to know it.”[24]

    Neff adds that “Frankfurter claimed that Gibson “had no right to make reports to the department in regard to Jewish matters and should have ‘refused’ on the ground that I could not possibly learn enough about them to make even general observations.” Frankfurter then hinted that if Gibson continued his reports, the Zionists would block his confirmation as ambassador to Poland by the Senate.”[25]

    A letter that Gibson wrote to his mother on 27 June 1919, three days after his meeting with Brandeis and Frankfurter, casts an interesting light on own his state of mind at the time: “I went down to the Relief Administration where I had two solid hours with Lewis Strauss [Herbert Hoover’s private secretary] on the Jewish question. I find that most of the people are overwrought and have reached that stage where they unconsciously want to believe every exaggerated yarn about excesses against the Jews. They take it as prejudice if you question any story no matter whether they know where it comes from or not, so long as it makes out a case against the Poles and shows that the Jews are suffering. They are in a bad situation but you can’t help the patient by treating him for an ailment he does not suffer from. I think that at the end of two hours I had convinced Lewis that I was not a Jew baiter and that I really want to help even if not in his simple way which consists chiefly in blackguarding the Polish Government for everything to be found in any report, no matter what its source, its foundation or its inspiration. I can see that there will be a tremendous amount of patient talking to be done among the American Jews before they will be willing to abandon the idea of curing all the ills of their people by one blast at the Polish Government. They have got to make up their minds to work untiringly with the Government and not against it, and if they do I am convinced they can accomplish great things.”

    As for the somewhat surprising allegation that Gibson’s report had “undone their work for monthszn” it clearly pointed to the fact that the Zionists, who had indeed been working hard to impose a Minorities Treaty on Poland, needed as many accounts of atrocities against Jews as could be found to further their cause. Although the Minorities Treaty was indeed signed a few days after the confrontation, Gibson’s report ran counter to their interests.[26]

    Louis Marshall, President of the American Jewish Committee, was also present in Paris, also favored dealing sternly with the Polish government, and took the position that Gibson was willfully minimizing the whole matter to protect Poland. The incendiary campaign that he launched against the American Envoy in Poland in the American press on 14 June 1919 was carried by many papers around the country and made a powerful and longlasting impression on American public opinion.

    As the foregoing suggests, Gibson believed that a positive approach and strong encouragement towards the establishment of rule of law and equality for all citizens would be more helpful to Poland and to the stability of Eastern Europe than the sort of “bullying and browbeating” recommended by Frankfurter and other Zionist leaders in America

    In fact, Zionist policy baffled him initially, and he expressed perplexity at the goals they were pursuing. He considered that their prime interest should be to ensure the immediate security of Polish Jews. At times, the Zionists infuriated him because he was convinced that the anti-Polish campaign then under way in the American press was actually putting Polish Jews at risk, mainly because all of the hostile assertions were promptly reported in the Polish and Jewish press, where they could only inflame an already-volatile situation and foster further violence and disorder.

  206. @Caruthers

    There is a 10 trillion dollar USA public sector and 100 trillion dollar financial sector…

    half a drop in the ocean? if I need “books” to experience real life, call me a Palestinian

    WTF is a “taxpayer”

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Petrodollar_recycling

    • Replies: @Caruthers
    , @Caruthers
  207. chris says:
    @anarchyst

    In fact, there are Catholic sects outside the Roman Catholic sect that allow married priests.

    ??? Anarchyst, there are Catholic priests INSIDE the Catholic Church who are allowed to marry, they’re called Greek Catholics, they even have Bishops in the college of cardinals, though their bishops are celibate.

  208. anarchyst says:

    You are misreading my comment. outside Roman Catholicism, NOT outside Catholicism.
    The only married priests inside Roman Catholicism are those who converted from Episcopal (Anglican) Protestantism.
    Regards,

    • Replies: @chris
  209. Caruthers says:
    @simple mind

    Books bad; Wikipedia good.

    • Thanks: nokangaroos
  210. chris says:
    @anarchyst

    Yeah, ok, true as you stated 🙂
    I just meant that the Greek Catholics are also directly under the pope, so to speak. But I guess you knew that already; never mind!

  211. Rich says:
    @simple mind

    There was never a “Polish Lithuanian Jewish German Commonwealth”. For some reason you added “Jewish” and German to the name of the place. I wonder why? The Poles I’ve known have been decent fellows, some very intelligent. Your anti-Polish hatred and trying to pretend that Jews were a significant part of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth makes me think that you may be one of those from an ethnicity that roamed the earth for centuries until by the good grace of Christian Europeans were given a country they couldn’t make by themselves and are now unable to defend by themselves without massive foreign aid. Your people weren’t very nice to the Poles when they were guests in that country. Try to find a little humility.

  212. @Colin Wright

    Stop right there. Those deportations never occurred. Other rulers practiced people-moving — but not the Romans.

    What are you saying? Tiberius and Claudius never kicked Jews out of Rome?

    Romans practiced plenty of people moving. The would conquer people and then move them away as slaves.

    • Replies: @Colin Wright
  213. Caruthers says:
    @simple mind

    Refutation starts at about 7:00

    • Thanks: Thomasina
  214. @Rich

    They should have spent more time building up their military and it might have been in their best interest, though very difficult, to have just given Germans their Danzig Corridor, buying themselves more time.

    It wouldn’t have changed anything. Hitler and the Nazis had made the decision to carve up Poland years earlier. They planned on wiping Warsaw off the map and turning Poles into slaves as part of revenge over Versailles. It was a common German view at the time that Poles should be the subjects of Germany. The Danzig Corridor was merely a gimmick that Hitler was using to press the British. It’s a myth that the corridor was Hitler’s only demand.

    The Poles also had no idea that the Germans had made a deal with the Soviets. There was an assumption that the British and French would open a Western front and they could retreat to the East.

    There was really no good option for the Poles.

    And who on earth thought the French would be defeated so quickly? If the French military hadn’t grown so incompetent and weak, the Germans would have been defeated and WW2 avoided.

    There is an interesting theory that they lost too many natural warriors and military thinkers during the Napoleonic wars. It’s mind boggling as to how many men they lost over the course of about 15 years and they went right back to their original borders. So war dysgenics probably favored the procreation of passivists and cheese eaters that stayed home. WW1 then finished off any remaining warrior stock.

    They also didn’t have good leaders during WW2. A lot of the French also privately believed a fascist party was needed to take on the Communists. The French resistance in the movies is mostly a Hollywood creation. The Germans were actually surprised by how much the French cooperated with them. Hitler in fact held them with disdain for capitulating.

    • Replies: @annamaria
    , @Rich
  215. @John Johnson

    ‘What are you saying? Tiberius and Claudius never kicked Jews out of Rome?’

    They certainly never kicked the Jews out of Palestine. That was clearly a fantasy.

    • Replies: @John Johnson
  216. One has to wonder if Hitler was at least in part willing to gamble world war over Poland because of its Jewish population.

    The professional class of Poland at the time was indeed heavily Jewish although they didn’t create as many international left-wing leaders as German Jews. But perhaps he couldn’t resist when combined with common German sentiment that Poland shouldn’t exist as an independent state.

    If his goal from the beginning was to go after the Jews of Europe then maybe he didn’t care if he might eventually lose against world powers. He even made a comment about how the sting of WW1 wouldn’t be so bad if they had killed a few thousand Jews.

    But I suppose the simplest answer is that he was just plain reckless and then became extremely arrogant after taking France. He couldn’t stop gambling and then bet it all on a massive war against the Soviets while leaving the Western front open. Well we know how that ended.

    • Disagree: HdC
    • Replies: @nokangaroos
  217. @Mike Tre

    ‘…Teenage boys being the primary focus of homosexual men for grooming and buggering…’

    I should just keep quiet — but how exceptional is it for heterosexual men to be attracted to teenage girls?

    In fact, it would appear that the imperative would be to protect teenagers, regardless of of inclination.

    …and the horror of it is, teenagers don’t seem to want to be protected. Go figure. Of course, none of us have any attraction to teenagers — and they’re quite devoid of such impulses themselves.

    That goes without saying.

    What it boils down to, is homosexuality a repulsive abomination, or not? If it is, then they shouldn’t be allowed to bugger anyone. If it isn’t, why should teenage boys be sacrosanct when we all know perfectly well we want to nail the cashier at Wendy’s?

    • Replies: @Mike Tre
  218. annamaria says:
    @simple mind

    “The Israeli government seems to be working very well…”

    — Can you comment on the Jewish State’s support of Ukrainian self-proclaimed neo-nazis (Banderites)? Israel has been providing Banderites with Israel-made rifles, whereas the Jewish Lobby in the US has been pushing towards delivering more weaponry for Banderites. And it was an Israeli citizen Kolomoisky who has been financing the neo-nazi battalion Azov. https://www.rt.com/russia/545001-nationalists-march-torches-kiev/
    Does not smell well.

  219. annamaria says:
    @simple mind

    Guess it is inconvenient for your to talk about goyims’ intelligence in sciences, philosophy, music, architecture, and visual arts…

    Does Nuland-Kagan (and the whole Kagans clan) belong to the Ashkenazi group? If yes, how would you qualify these amazing fruit of the Kagans’ efforts in Ukraine? —
    “Thousands march to honor WWII Nazi collaborator:”

    Ukrainian nationalists paraded in torchlight procession in Kiev with portraits of Hitler ally.

    https://www.rt.com/russia/545001-nationalists-march-torches-kiev/

    These torchlight processions have become a tradition, thanks to the efforts of Nuland-Kagan/Pyatt/Carl Gershman and other American zionists (Ashkenazi?). So let us, the readers on this forum doubt your enthusiasm re Ashkenazim’s superior intelligence.

    “Torchlit march honors Ukrainian nationalist leader Stepan Bandera:”

  220. annamaria says:
    @simple mind

    You are stubbornly evasive when real stats are available.
    The statement, “Jews are admitted to Harvard at 15 times the ratio of equal or better qualified European Americans, and 7.5 times higher than equal or better qualified Asian Americans” is a conclusion of the research, not some ethnocentric hearsay.
    See Herrnstein and Murray’s The Bell Curve (New York: Simon & Schuster, 1994)

    • Replies: @Caruthers
  221. annamaria says:
    @John Johnson

    https://www.lewrockwell.com/2003/08/thomas-m-sipos/poland-joined-hitler-in-dismembering-czechoslovakia/

    On September 22, Chamberlain agreed to allow Hitler to annex the Sudetenland but refused to permit immediate entry for German troops, thus Hitler remained dissatisfied. On September 23, Czechoslovakia mobilized its military and war looked imminent.

    Then Poland made its move. On September 27, seeing Czechoslovakia in crisis as Germany prepared to invade, Poland issued an ultimatum demanding that Czechoslovakia cede its Tesin (Teschen) district.

    On September 29, France, Britain, Germany, and Italy signed the Munich Agreement. This allowed Hitler to take the Sudetenland in exchange for him agreeing to “guarantee” Czechoslovakia’s borders – but only after Poland and Hungary (which by now had joined in) had taken their shares.

    https://debatepolitics.com/threads/the-polish-occupation-of-czechoslovakia-1938-year.169189/

    Section and the destruction of Czechoslovakia as an independent state with the participation of Germany, Hungary and Poland in the years 1938-1939. These events are not officially included in the history of the Second World War, but are closely associated with it and it may be the first step in this war.
    1) Polish tanks 7TR included in the Czech city Tesín (Cieszyn). October 1938
    2 )Polish soldiers posing with deposed Czechoslovak coat of arms, at have captured, during “Operation Zaluzha”
    3) Handshake Polish Marshal Edward Rydz-Smigla and the German Colonel Bogislav fon Studnitz . November 11, 1938
    4) Polish soldiers on captured by the Czech checkpoint in Czech-German border, near the pedestrian bridge
    5) Poles replace Czech name on the Polish. Station. Tesín.

  222. Rich says:
    @John Johnson

    The Poles did manage to defeat the Soviets in the early 1920s and if they’d been able to build a stronger, more modern military, might have been able to keep Hitler busy enough in the East that the French could have held the Germans until the British could reinforce them. Stalin held back until he Germans had basically beaten the Poles before sending in his boys. Why were the Germans so much stronger than their neighbors at the beginning of the war? The real war should have been against communism.

    • Replies: @John Johnson
  223. @Colin Wright

    They certainly never kicked the Jews out of Palestine. That was clearly a fantasy.

    There was never some single event of mass expulsion that forced them to live in Europe. That is correct.

    But a lot of them were enslaved and pressured to leave after the revolts.

    • Agree: Hibernian
  224. Druid55 says:
    @Colin Wright

    Foolish! They’re always scheming for that steering wheel because they are “chosen”. Must rules and be served like “effemdis”.

  225. Druid says:
    @Realist

    Realist, you’re an annoying masochist beating your likely head against the wall. Why don’t you just bugger off so we can concentrate on intelligent comments

    • Replies: @Realist
  226. Druid says:
    @silviosilver

    What an absolutely dumb comment! Silviosilver, moron indeed!

  227. chris says:
    @simple mind

    Well, apparently you’re not familiar with Ron’s own groundbreaking research on this topic: https://www.unz.com/runz/xxamerican-pravda-racial-discrimination-at-harvard/

  228. Thomasina says:
    @EuroNat

    Great post. I think you are right over the target. Realist consistently steers Christian Euro Americans AWAY from anything that could hurt Jews and toward things that could actually harm Christian Euro Americans (armed uprising).

    He seeks to instill doubt (you’re too stupid, it’s too late, it’s hopeless). For anyone who’s paying attention, this is manipulation. Not someone you could trust.

    You see it, I see it. I’m hoping others do too. Thanks.

  229. @annamaria

    Well actually Stepan spent a lot more time as a CIA goon than as a
    Natzee collaborator 😀

    It´s an unfortunate attempt at stirring up anti-Russian hatred (and a reaction
    to Russian fêting of the Great Patriotic War);
    it also serves to hide from the Ukies that the ones now ruling them and
    telling them to hate the Russians are the same ones who massacred them
    1919 – 1975.

    • Replies: @annamaria
    , @Pepe the Frog
  230. @John Johnson

    “I have now had forwarded to the Polish government the following proposal:

    1. Danzig returns as a Free State into the fold of the German Reich.
    2. Germany receives through the Corridor a road and a railroad at her disposal
    with the same exterritorial character for Germany as the Corridor has for Poland.

    In return Germany offers to:

    1. Recognize all Poland´s economic rights in Danzig;
    2. Guarantee Poland a free-harbor in Danzig of discretionary size and fully free
    access;
    3. Hereby accept the borders between Germany and Poland as given and
    with prejudice;
    4. Conclude a 25-year non-aggression pact, therefore a treaty reaching far beyond
    my own lifetime, and
    5. Secure the independence of the Slovak state jointly by Germany, Poland and
    Hungary, which in practice means renouncement of any unilateral German hegemony in the region.”

    – Adolf Hitler, speech from 28.April 1939

    Let´s see if you can find fault (apart from my lack of nuance).
    Never heard of it? The Poles were being had, and they still are.

    Cui bono?

  231. Realist says:
    @Druid

    Why don’t you just bugger off so we can concentrate on intelligent comments

    When do you plan to start? None of you dumb bastards have done it yet.

  232. Realist says:
    @Druid

    You are!

    Excellent come back. LOL

  233. EuroNat says:
    @Colin Wright

    I have no problem generalizing about blacks: I think those generalizations are perfectly valid, and they lead to some conclusions I ultimately have no problem with.

    I have seen this double standard abundantly on this site. Classic moronic and coward Sailerism: Its ok to point out and be snarky at patterns of black misbehaviour, but problematic and hateful to point out Jewish ones. Big Crimestop moans pop up among the commentariat when too many pieces critical of Jews are written.

    It is all pure idiocy and short sightedness. Where would be blacks and BLM and this anti (black) racism powerful lobby if they weren’t supported legally, financially, journalistically and politically by Jews?

    Suddenly blacks are the new elite, second only to Jews, and you did never asked yourself how all this could possibly become a reality, knowing blacks could not lobby their way out of a paper bag without Jewish support?

    The lack of awareness of many rightoids on this site is laughable.

  234. annamaria says:
    @nokangaroos

    “the ones now ruling them and telling them to hate the Russians are the same ones who massacred them 1919 – 1975.”

    — Correct.
    Here is an astute observation by Patrick Armstrong regarding the ongoing attempt at regime change in Kazakhstan and the RAND report ‘predicting’ the regime change. By the way, the observation makes a deadly blow to the myth of Jewish intellectual supremacy:

    I also find it curious that the Imperium’s officials say what they’re going to do out loud but I think the explanation is that these people are cunning, yes, but they are also rather stupid. Their conviction of their rightness, exceptionalism, power makes them stupid. Do we not see, over and over again, that their cunning plots backfire on them? Is the USA stronger today after 20-25 years of non-stop neocon cunning plots, or is it weaker?

    https://www.moonofalabama.org/2022/01/the-us-directed-rebellion-in-kazakhstan-may-well-strengthen-russia.html#comments
    The US neocons are ziocons, all of them. Listen to and look at Pelosi, Trump, and the likes, at how they kneel and kiss the AIPAC’s tender places.
    Until the US declares that AIPAC is a subversive and treasonous organization, the zionized opportunists in US Congress will continue to promote arrogant and imbecilic policies that have already inflicted great self-harm on the US.

    Here is certain Douglas Feith:

    Not a single Iraq war screw-up has gone by without someone tagging Feith (who, as the Defense Department’s undersecretary for policy, is the Pentagon’s No. 3 civilian, after Donald Rumsfeld and Paul Wolfowitz) as the guy to blame. … Gen. Tommy Franks called Feith “the fucking stupidest guy on the face of the earth.”

    Yet the “stupidest” Israel-firster Douglas Feith was not punished; moreover, he has produced a similarly inadequate progeny with strong Israel-first convictions. https://mondoweiss.net/2008/07/writing-two-years-ago-in-the-harvard-israel-review-gosh-i-never-knew-about-this-publication-daniel-feith-said-a-successfu/

    • Replies: @mulga mumblebrain
  235. @nokangaroos

    Despite having a declining population and millions upon millions of square miles of almost perfectly uninhabited and undeveloped land east of the Urals, Russia still gazes covetously west to the cities, factories, farms, and mines their western neighbors built. This is a Russian tradition going back at least to Prince Askold’s pillaging of Constantinople in the 9th Century, if not further, and predates both the Khazar Turks’ conversion to Judaism and Russia’s conversion to Christianity. All Russia’s neighbors have very good historical reason to hate and fear them, and need no “stirring up” to recall everything the Russians have done to them within living memory.

    Not everything can be blamed on the Jews. Not everything.

    • Replies: @mulga mumblebrain
  236. @Rich

    The Poles did manage to defeat the Soviets in the early 1920s and if they’d been able to build a stronger, more modern military, might have been able to keep Hitler busy enough in the East that the French could have held the Germans until the British could reinforce them. Stalin held back until the Germans had basically beaten the Poles before sending in his boys.

    I am glad you mentioned the Polish-Soviet war since it is one of the great forgotten wars but the Polish would have had no chance against the Germans. They did push back the Soviets but that was a completely different Red Army when compared to 1941. Lenin also thought the Poles would be a pushover and that they could keep marching across Europe.

    The Germans in 1939 were ahead of everyone in tactics. The Soviets only started making gains after copying what the Germans were doing. Our modern infantry and artillery are in fact still based on WW2 Germany. Everyone copied the Germans.

    The real war should have been against communism.

    Agreed and it was in fact shameful for Hitler to fight veterans of the Polish-Soviet war.

    • Replies: @nokangaroos
  237. While it is true that not all inclement weather should be blamed on the Jews,
    why don´t you say what you mean?
    Iwan IV Grozny introduced the vodka monopoly and the secret police but
    it was the Jews who put both to use.
    The contested real estate (“Noworossija”) was taken from the Turks by
    Catherine the Great (those Germans have even invented the devil) and the
    unjustly-maligned Prince Potemkin built Sevastopol and Dniepropetrowsk;
    due to a certain … indolence of available manpower (the ongoing inability
    to develop the Far East is a sore spot, yes) Catherine and later Alexander I
    shopped for talent elsewhere, and it was Tatars (because they didn´t drink)
    and Germans (because they actually worked) who built what was there to build.
    (I´m pretty certain this is not what you meant 😛 )

    – As the Jewish hatred for Mother Russia also goes back to Catherine´s
    social reforms it is best to partition the Ukraine along a SW-NE line and
    hand the NW to the Poles (who are going to need it when they are
    dislodged from East Germany).

  238. @nokangaroos

    Everyone knows that Hitler made nominal public offers to Poland over Danzig, just as he had signed the Munich Agreement on September 29, 1938, and then proceeded to occupy Czechoslovakia on March 15, 1939. The records of Hitler’s internal memos make it clear that he was never seeking an honest settlement over Danzig.

    On May 23, 1939, Hitler dictated to Schmundt the protocol which included:

    “It is not Danzig that is at stake. For us it is a matter of expanding our living space in the East.”

    Danzig never was the focal point of Hitler’s ambitions. It was a pretext for bigger aims. This is why Halder recorded in his diary on August 14:

    “Fuehrer is concerned lest Britain hamper showdown by last-minute offers.”

    Hitler did not desire a settlement over Danzig at that point but was now committed to his aim of conquering living space with a drive to the East.

    • Replies: @nokangaroos
  239. @John Johnson

    As long as Pilsudski lived
    (who remembered who had fought by his side against Budjonnij´s cossacks)
    there was no problem.

    • Replies: @Patrick McNally
  240. @nokangaroos

    There was no problem really until the occupation of Czechoslovakia. The Poles cooperated in this themselves, but thereafter they could no longer take seriously any offer for a settlement over Danzig similar to the Munich Agreement. But the records of Jerzy Potocki’s communications from Washington show a very pro-German sentiment during the period before March 15, 1939. Potocki was repeatedly scorning the attempts of the Roosevelt administration to speak critically of Germany. Then after March 15 the Polish government tightened its hand and refused to make any deal over Danzig.

    • Replies: @HdC
  241. @Patrick McNally

    (as “Poland” had just swallowed a piece of Czechoslovakia, yours is a funny little argument; oh, and the Karl Franzens-Universität Prag is still the oldest German university)
    – It is not implausible there were medium-term designs towards the East –
    the memories of the English hunger blockade were fresh; it is equally clear
    the Germans did not want war … maybe yet
    (I find the Z-Plan rather convincing – your experiences may differ).

    • Replies: @Patrick McNally
  242. @nokangaroos

    No historian claims that Hitler wanted a big war in 1939, though he was willing to take a chance of a small war with the gamble that it wouldn’t rage out of control. But the point is that a Polish government which saw the easy way that Hitler went into Czechoslovakia in violation of the Munich Agreement could not have taken him seriously on other offers. Yes, the Polish government themselves were hypocrites since they had willingly been a part of the dismemberment of Czechoslovakia. This is something which Putin has raised a few times recently.

    • Replies: @nokangaroos
  243. @Patrick McNally

    I do get the impression the-Poles-that-be read: (((Rydz))) were itching for
    a war with Germany while their army still outnumbered and outgunned
    the Wehrmacht (minus the part bound by France in the West) but that´s
    conjecture – so OK, we´re close enough for government work 😉

  244. Towey says:
    @Redneck farmer

    Usury was not legal before the Reformation. It was considered, and still is considered, a sin for Catholics and Muslims. That is why the Jews were marginalised and treated as pariahs. It was only because of the legalization of usury with the Reformation and the accumulation of wealth by that means, that Jews became powerful members of society and were able to establish their central banks and thus acquiring the means of imposing their NWO. The idiotic WASPS doing all the dirty work of course.
    In his book the History of the Protestant Reformation in England and Ireland, William Cobbett, a Protestant, and reputable economist and historian describes the Jews with such disdain and in such a derogatory manner that it is hard to believe that after the passage of 200 years you can’t even criticise the underhand activities of Soros without being labelled an anti-Semite.

  245. Caruthers says:
    @annamaria

    Better yet, consult Ron Unz’s The Myth of American Meritocracy.

  246. @Arthur MacBride

    That’s sloppy. First of all, there is no such thing as the “Jewish World Almanac” anywhere. There is The World Almanac, plain and simple. There is also the American Jewish Yearbook. It may be that this blogger was suffering from crossed wires and somehow merged these 2 different publications into a “Jewish World Almanac” which does not exist. Secondly, it is apparent from looking over the 1948 edition of The World Almanac that the book was simply republishing prewar data and made no claim to have arrived at an up-to-date figure from post-1945 surveys.

    It’s pretty normal that for a few years after a war publishers may simply reprint old demographic data. In 1991 there was a Yugoslav census carried out which provided the last known peacetime data for some years while the wars raged. Many books in the 1990s would quote the old Yugoslav census of 1991 even though it was obvious that the wars had caused major population shifts. The editors of The World Almanac simply elected for the first few years after the war 10 continue printing old numbers. But they never claimed to have found a new study with updated figures as a basis for asserting 15.7+ million in 1948.

    On page 249 in the 1948 edition The World Almanac actually mentions the American Jewish Yearbook as a source for what they claim was a world Jewish population of 1939 (prewar). But in 1945-6 the American Jewish Yearbook was asserting a figure of 11 million for the postwar world Jewish population. The World Almanac delayed the publication of this figure for a few years and went on publishing prewar figures, until they decided to adopt the 11 million in 1949. But The World Almanac never claimed to have actually found a different source for the 15.7+ million as a postwar figure.

    Now that figure of 11 million may very well be a significant underestimate. But if one wants to argue such then the 15.7+ million published for a few years in The World Almanac is irrelevant. It is not a competing estimate arrived at in a dispute with the 11 million. It was simply a rehash of prewar numbers while the editors of The World Almanac waited to see if anything better than the American Jewish Yearbook’s estimate of 11 million would be substantiated. In 1949 they decided it wouldn’t be.

    • Replies: @Arthur MacBride
  247. @Patrick McNally

    Now that figure of 11 million may very well be a significant underestimate.

    Indeed it may. If you have objection to the two blogs above, citing a Jewish reference in support of the “Holocaust” (as a major downgrade from previously accepted figures) is unlikely to be taken seriously. It also may be that those blogs are “sloppy”, but knowing what everyone knows about Jewish reporting it’s certain that they are nearer the truth than any Jewish re-writes.

    • Replies: @Patrick McNally
  248. @Arthur MacBride

    It’s sloppy because:

    a) There’s no such thing as the “Jewish World Almanac” and they clearly meant The World Almanac.

    b) The World Almanac never claimed that 15.7+ million Jews were alive in 1945.

    They simply did what I’ve already noted was done in many books with Yugoslav statistics in the 1990s. They published old data without claiming that it was up-to-date with the postwar era. People who are under the delusion that the figure of 15.7+ million was somehow arrived at by The World Almanac from a fresh postwar demographic investigation are hopeless.

    • Troll: Arthur MacBride
    • Replies: @Arthur MacBride
  249. @Pepe the Frog

    Russophobe psychopath amphibian, with a real talent for lying. Probably lives in some Kiev sewage mistreatment works.

    • LOL: Pepe the Frog
  250. @annamaria

    If your group narcissism tells you, generation after generation, that you are the Supreme Beings of the Universe (Daleks eat your tin hearts out), ‘Gods Upon the Earth’ in Begin’s usage, ‘God’s Chosen People’, with souls superior to all other living beings, with the greatest intellects of ALL human beings, and envied and hated by all the inferior ‘two-legged animals’, it takes a strong Will to treat other human beings as your Earthly equals. THAT is why I do admire non-Zionazi, non-Judeofascist, non-Talmudic Jews very much.

  251. @DrWatson

    ‘Goygrom’, as in the Kitos War, or for decades in Gaza, Lebanon, the West Bank etc.

  252. @Patrick McNally

    Your challenge to pop stats in Germany/Europe and detailed references to conditions in camps etc is to label them as “sloppy” and their compilers as “hopeless” is based on your ref to a Yugoslav census for which you provide no link …

    Additionally you cite some probably imagination-based Jewish source and again you provide no link or statistical justification.

    Can you be serious, or expect people to take you seriously ?

    In the past, posters here have disputed your referenceless and fanciful allegations which are replete with words like “probably” and “maybe” and “perhaps” in order to (you imagine) bolster standard History Channel-talmudist narratives.

    You are a Troll, “Patrick McNally”, and a Story-Teller.
    I have returned you to Ignore.

    • Replies: @Patrick McNally
  253. @Arthur MacBride

    I referenced the very specific false claim that any source had ever reached a post-1945 estimate of 15.7+ million for the world Jewish population. That was a sloppy error. None of that has anything to do with conditions in camps in Germany or anywhere else. It is simply an issue of was The World Almanac of 1948 referring to a recently done study when it listed a number of 15.7+ million or were they just repeating old figures from prewar times. The latter was the case. I also noted that the false reference to a “Jewish World Almanac” was an example of carelessness in citing a non-existent title.

  254. Caruthers says:
    @simple mind

    Why Jews should have such a fanatical and morbid ethnocentric naval-gazing obsession with themselves does beg for explanation. It surely results from millennia of cultural indoctrination, ever since they formulated the absurd creed that the entire universe was created solely for the service and convenience of their tiny tribe.
    But this unique self-obsession continues today and is seen everywhere.
    Examples:
    They incessantly market their own suffering in World War 2, and vilify as bigoted any suggestion that the far more numerous Gentile deaths should not be ignored and were in fact a greater evil. With unique, indefatigable fanaticism, they work to institute anti-blasphemy laws which criminalize any challenge to their narrative of their uniquely horrible suffering.

    Similarly, although they are an extremely prosperous group which is hugely over-represented in virtually all powerful and prestigious positions, they unceasingly push and agitate for ever broader definitions and standards proscribing, not discrimination and bigotry generally, but only bigotry exclusively and specifically against them.

    Wherever they live, they work tirelessly to bribe and punish politicians in their resident nation to ensure that such politicians all slavishly but effusively support the small, foreign ethno-state which is exclusively for their ethnic group, while they simultaneously work zealously to institute legal penalties for anyone who protests against the discrimination and human-rights abuses perpetrated by that ethno-state. They then hypocritically vilify as racist any other country which, rather than simply being a state of its citizens regardless of ethnic background/ancestry, similarly seeks to privilege some ancestries and ethnicities above others. As a final flourish of hypocrisy, they denounce as bigots anyone who openly notices their dual-loyalty and double-standards.

    They constantly cite their statistically impressive achievements in many fields as evidence of generally superior group intelligence (e.g., Bret Stephens), while vilifying as racist anyone who may make similar claims, based on similar evidence (e.g., whites compared to blacks). This constant stream of paeans to their own excellence is unique. For example, Asian-Americans for years have been trouncing Ashkenazi-Americans in academic competitions such as the Putnam Exam, but Asian-Americans never publish such paeans to themselves. Blacks are far more dominant among basketball players and sprinters than Ashkenazi Jews have ever been in any intellectual field, yet they issue far fewer proclamations of their own group superiority.

    Ancient Greeks had the best case ever for their own intellectual supremacy. In a couple of centuries, among their Herculean achievements, they created or discovered mathematics as a deductive science, in which theorems are proven from axioms (an achievement Morris Klein describes as “surpassing human reason”); they discovered or created logic as a discipline, with the Aristotelian syllogism; they discerned the principle of the natural sciences, which is that nature is governed by universal laws which are discoverable by human reason, without appealing to the fiat of some deity; they developed the first complete written language, with symbols for vowels as well as consonants; they developed musical theory and acoustic science that laid the foundation for Western music; they were the first to write histories as opposed to mere chronicles or annals, and thus founded history as a discipline; they created or discovered the field of political science, in which different modes of government and political organization are compared; they were the first to perform dramas, from which all plays, television, and movies derive. Yet not even the Greeks wrote as many paeans to their own superiority as do contemporary Jews. Today Jews seek to make Jewish intellectual superiority into a sacred dogma, like the Holocaust narrative, and even dismiss simple facts as “goofy opinions”, like the fact that the highest-ranked chess player in history is a Gentile.

    • Thanks: Sepp
    • Replies: @Mevashir
  255. HdC says:
    @Patrick McNally

    “…Potocki was repeatedly scorning the attempts of the Roosevelt administration to speak critically of Germany. …”

    I’m interested in this assertion.
    Could you please refer me to some text that elaborates on this? Thanks.

    • Replies: @Patrick McNally
  256. @profnasty

    I have read Jones a few times. I see him as the RC equivalent of a Protestant Evangelical – intolerant of those with whom he does not agree.

  257. @HdC

    Some of Potocki’s more dramatic statements include his message back home of February 9, 1938:

    “The Jews are right now the leaders in creating a war psychosis which would plunge the entire world into war and bring about general catastrophe… This international Jewry exploits every means of propaganda to oppose any tendency towards any kind of consolidation and understanding between nations.”

    Again, on January 12, 1939:

    “Propaganda is mostly in the hands of the Jews who control almost 100 percent radio, film, daily and periodical press… It is interesting to note that in this extremely well-planned campaign, which is conducted above all against National Socialism, Soviet Russia is almost completely excluded…”

    Although the German government published many documents of this type after it had captured the records, the main English publication of this is probably the 2nd issue in 1983 of the Journal of Historical Review, Volume 4, Number 2. What is especially ironic is that the editor Mark Weber listed the quotations in an effort to assert that Roosevelt was somehow responsible for the outbreak of war in 1939. Unfortunately, these documents do not support that claim.

    The documentary record shows that up to at least March 7, 1939, the Polish diplomat Potocki was repeatedly critical of Roosevelt as someone who was seeking a war in Europe in order to stimulate the US economy. Only after Hitler had occupied Czechoslovakia on March 15 did Potocki’s earlier scathing commentaries about Roosevelt and Jewish backers become suddenly irrelevant. The evidence is clear that Poland’s shift to a stern anti-German attitude was driven by Hitler’s actions, not any imaginary influence exerted by Roosevelt. If Hitler had simply respected the Munich Agreement, then it is very likely that Potocki would have advised his government to not let a conflict over Danzig develop.

    • Replies: @HdC
  258. Mevashir says:
    @HdC

    I believe most of the US “aid” to Israel is actually transfer payments from the American taxpayer to the American military industrial complex with the end products being shipped to Israel. Almost all of the money is earmarked to be spent on American military manufacturers.

  259. Mevashir says:
    @Caruthers

    Very eloquently stated with “just the facts ma’am”.

    About 10 years ago I attended a holocaust event at the local University. It was hosted by the campus Hillel Jewish student organization with the Hillel director running the program. At that time I knew little about Holocaust Revisionism, but I had been learning about the enormous death and casualty toll throughout the world in the calamity we call world war II.

    I approached the director and asked her very calmly why the fire bombings of Germany and Japan along with the nuclear attacks on Japan were not considered part of the Holocaust narrative. The woman started trembling and her face turned white with anger and she snarled at me “Only Jews have a right to use that term!” And then she summoned campus security to evict me from the event.

    As a Jewish person, it is been exceedingly painful for me to recognize how destructive to the world Jewish narcissism truly is. I have been on a long and difficult path of personal growth and Awakening. It is only by reading of the sufferings of Jesus at the hands of his own people that I have gained courage to follow the evidence wherever it leads and to try to proclaim the truth courageously.

    PS Thank you to Ron Unz for apparently lifting my ban on commenting on this site.

  260. anon[376] • Disclaimer says:
    @Colin Wright

    In short, in Poland Jews were a large and linguistically alien population in a nation virtually lacking a gentile middle class. In Germany, they were a small, German speaking minority, generally on about the same footing as at least the more prosperous elements of the gentile population.

    according to the book Unfinished Victory, jews in Germany, less than 1% of the population, still owned over a third of all real property as late as 1938

    • Replies: @Patrick McNally
  261. anon[376] • Disclaimer says:
    @simple mind

    This corresponds with the population itself, let’s say that “20% of the high end university pool are ethnically Jewish”. It’s probably twice that number because “Jewish” is neither ethnicity by itself, nor is it possible actually count people that way.

    according to a Ron Unz study of the National Merit Scholarship foundation finalists, jews are about 6% of the names on that list while white European non-jews are about 70%

    so for every qualified jew there are about 10-12 qualified non-jewish whites

  262. @Realist

    Except for, you know, the point that higher J int is only supported by a single study of cherry-picked J schoolchildren vs non-picked euros. And, that small detail that if Ashkenaz even averaged 105 IQ, their numeracy in Israel alongside the average Israeli IQ ~95 would require the rest of the Jews in Israel to be sub 85 IQ to fit the numbers. So, Jewish intelligence is a transparent rationalistic myth.

    In reality, Ashkenaz worldwide average 98 IQ with a spike to 102-105 in the verbal, related to their pathologically legalistic Talmudicism. Their predominance in Euro society is due primarily to longstanding parasitic capture of the nigh-strategic-fundament economic systems. The secondary reason is the nepotistic trickledown effects of same.

    They’re on top because they’re predatory, immoral, and psychopathic. We’re on the bottom because we’re naive and trusting, and now adulterated by outsiders, deceived by systematic propaganda, and defiled by sexual immorality. Got any further inanities to proffer?

    • Agree: HdC
  263. HdC says:
    @Patrick McNally

    Thank you for that enlightening information.
    However, I vehemently disagree with your conclusion beginning with: “…Only after Hitler had occupied…”
    I submit that Poland became recalcitrant in negotiating with Germany at the behest of the USA, and the British unconditional guarantee to defend Poland no matter what.

    • Replies: @Patrick McNally
  264. @HdC

    The British guarantee to Poland was itself something that was very specifically made because of the occupation of Czechoslovakia. Had there been no such occupation, there would have been no guarantee. British diplomats were hoisted into the position where they had previously demanded that Benes concede over the Sudetenland, with a promise that Germany was now done with Czechoslovakia, and then they saw Hitler roll over Czechoslovakia. That was very specifically the British motive for issuing an unconditional guarantee to Poland. Without the events of March 15, 1939, Britain would simply have urged Poland to negotiate over Danzig in the way that the Munich Agreement had been reached.

  265. @anon

    Maybe there is a technical truism in there, but that is not how things really were.

    “The Jews had also suffered a massive loss in economic power. As a group, they still had quite substantial assets at their disposal, yet many individuals had already been reduced to living off their last savings. The press carried almost daily reports on bankruptcies and business closures, particularly in the provinces. It was almost impossible tom obtain credit. German banks no longer issued loans to Jews and foreclosed on their mortgages. The Jewish banks still in existence did not have sufficient funds to replace the credit that had been withdrawn.”
    Avraham Barkai, From Boycott to Annihilation: The Economic Struggle of German Jews, 1933-1943, p. 106.

    The upshot is that by 1937 the actual administrative measures that had been enacted had deprived most of the nominal Jewish wealth that still remained of any real advantage.

    • Replies: @HdC
    , @anon
  266. HdC says:
    @Patrick McNally

    Turn-around is fair play, no?

    • Replies: @Patrick McNally
  267. Mike Tre says:
    @Colin Wright

    “I should just keep quiet — but how exceptional is it for heterosexual men to be attracted to teenage girls?”

    Not sure what you mean by exceptional in this sense, but it’s perfectly normal for men to be attracted to teen aged females. Nature deems them ready to reproduce once they begin to menstruate, and is indifferent to whatever the cultural norms are. Sex is the act of reproduction primarily, and attraction facilitates it. (As always when I point this out, I feel compelled to also point out that I don’t advocate grown men having sex with teenage females, and as a father of two teen aged girls myself, am content with how our current cultural norms attempt to restrict the act).

    “What it boils down to, is homosexuality a repulsive abomination, or not? If it is, then they shouldn’t be allowed to bugger anyone. If it isn’t, why should teenage boys be sacrosanct when we all know perfectly well we want to nail the cashier at Wendy’s? ”

    Christians always hide behind their faith when criticizing homosexuals, but I am not religious, and I reject the practice on purely natural terms. Homosexuality is an anti-natural pathology that perpetuates a cycle of mentally/emotionally/sexually/physically damaged men passing along their sickness to younger males through the actions of grooming, manipulation and ultimately, buggery. Homosexuals are not born as such, but older homosexuals breed news ones by committing their unnatural acts on impressionable teen aged boys. They spread venereal disease at rates higher than any other group due to their actions as well as suffer bizarre and permanent damage to parts of the body that were not designed to engage in the acts that they are used for. In modern terms they are a massive cost to society within the healthcare/insurance rackets, and as they acquire more political power they turn their gaze on even younger children in order to indoctrinate them sooner into acceptance if not participation into their world of buggery, bug chasing, drug addiction, bath house orgies, and permanent mental illness.

  268. @HdC

    Well first of all, the claim that German Jews in 1937 still had one-third of the wealth is clearly not in line with real world events. That’s what I was responding to.

  269. @nokangaroos

    Oh wow a quote from Hitler to the public? Must be true then. Here is another one:

    It is the last territorial claim which I have to make in Europe, but it is a claim from which I will not recede and which, God willing, I will make good.

    Adolf Hitler on the Munich Agreement

    Then he later committed a false flag attack on Poland and lied to the public about that as well. That was after lying and taking all of Czechoslovakia.

    What a swell guy.

    All he wanted was a Danzig corridor and then switched to a false flag attack justified invasion that prompted a world war (which he privately said could happen but bet against it).

    Then he just happened to have a list of all the Polish intellectuals that he wanted executed.

    Yes just wanted a few concessions. Had no plans for domination of the continent and turning Poland into German farmland. Just a reasonable guy that wanted a few things. Yea you tell yourself that. The same guy that called himself the greatest warlord to ever live.

    • Replies: @HdC
  270. anarchyst says:
    @Mike Tre

    Definition of homosexuality in five words:

    Homosexuality is a mental illness.

  271. HdC says:
    @John Johnson

    You may be entitled to your opinion; you are not entitled to your own facts.

    Any verified proof for your assertions?

  272. @Mike Tre

    You and Anna sure have a fixation. Methinks thou dost protest too much. Maybe it has to do with the size of master bedroom closets these days.

  273. @annamaria

    Yeah Ukrainians and Nuland are, at 1st glance, an odd couple. So what’s the Zionist plan for Ukraine? Could the plan be: to sacrifice Ukraine by using it as a tool to drag Russia, which is obviously the prize, into an unforgiving war?
    Ukrainians must be a little slow. They elected their version of Jerry Sienfeld to be their president. It’s all very murky until one looks at history.

  274. anon[376] • Disclaimer says:
    @Patrick McNally

    “The upshot is that by 1937 the actual administrative measures that had been enacted had deprived most of the nominal Jewish wealth that still remained of any real advantage.”

    no, the upshot is they still owned property at 33x the rate that actual Germans did

    and afaik they were free to sell their properties, that they had likely scooped up for pennies on the dollar during the hyperinflation from real Germans, and move to some other country like Palestine

    and some book written by an Abraham doesn’t change any of that

    • Replies: @Patrick McNally
  275. anon[376] • Disclaimer says:
    @Realist

    You know nothing about my comment history…you have posted thirty-six comments here.

    one has nothing to do with the other

    its simple enough to peruse this page:

    https://www.unz.com/comments/all/?commenterfilter=Realist

  276. @anon

    When a book has more historical documentary basis for what it says then it’s not changing things. Now you’re just repeating the hoax that Jews got wealthy off of the inflation of 1923. The main cause of that inflation was that the German Right wanted to subvert the reparations paid for Versailles by depriving the payments of value.

    “An eroding standard of living for much of the Jewish middle class became most starkly evident during the years of uncontrolled inflation at the beginning of the Weimar Republic and the years of depression at its end. In those difficult times marginal existences became unviable, forcing those who had led them to rely on public and private welfare. In the twelve years between 1912 and 1924, the proportion of Berlin Jews with taxable incomes of more than 5,000 marks fell from 10.6 percent to 5.8 percent, while during the same period the number of Jews with annual taxable incomes under 1,200 marks rose from 73.3 percent to 83.6 percent of the city’s Jewish population. Jews who lived on fixed incomes from savings or investments were ruined during the inflation.”
    — Donald Niewyk, The Jews in Weimar Germany, pp. 17-8.

    • Replies: @geokat62
    , @Ron Unz
  277. geokat62 says:
    @Patrick McNally

    Now you’re just repeating the hoax that Jews got wealthy off of the inflation of 1923.

    We dindu nuffin’, goy!

    Rabbi Yaron Reuven, discussing the first two laws Hitler Implemented to save Germany

    Excerpts from Rabbi Reuven’s video:

    [Hitler] said no more interest. Why? Because of the high interest that the Jews charged people was so high, it ruined, it destroyed the economy in Germany. They destroyed it. Just as they destroyed Russia a few years before through their communism over there. Jews, destroyed Russia. Not goyim. Jews destroyed… communism is by Jews. Don’t let anybody confuse you. You look at history – Karl Marx, all the other [speaks in Hebrew] they’re all Jews. Wicked, but nonetheless Jews. They destroyed Russia and he wrote it in chapter 2 of Mein Kampf, “they destroyed Russia, now they’re destroying Germany… that’s why I have to destroy them.”

    Now, this doesn’t make things right. Point is that’s actually real, true history.

  278. Ron Unz says:
    @Patrick McNally

    When a book has more historical documentary basis for what it says then it’s not changing things. Now you’re just repeating the hoax that Jews got wealthy off of the inflation of 1923…

    Well, I’d never heard of the author you quote, but nearly all of his books seem to be about the Holocaust, raising serious doubts about his objectivity and reliability.

    Meanwhile, our friend “Patrick McNally” has repeatedly annihilated his credibility. Among other absurdities, he’s claimed that very few, perhaps only 7%, of the early top Bolshevik leaders were Jewish, when the actual figure was probably closer to 70%. Moreover, he’s repeatedly claimed that the supposed gigantic famine produced by Mao’s Great Leap Forward never actually happened and was just a Western media hoax.

    https://www.unz.com/article/did-stalin-prepare-to-invade-germany/?showcomments#comment-5001563

    If you believe that almost all the early Bolshevik leaders were Gentiles and that there wasn’t any huge famine under Mao, go ahead and also believe his claims about Jews in Weimar Germany.

    • Agree: HdC
    • Replies: @Fran Taubman
  279. @Ron Unz

    Meanwhile, our friend “Patrick McNally” has repeatedly annihilated his credibility. Among other absurdities, he’s claimed that very few, perhaps only 7%, of the early top Bolshevik leaders were Jewish, when the actual figure was probably closer to 70%. Moreover, he’s repeatedly claimed that the supposed gigantic famine produced by Mao’s Great Leap Forward never actually happened and was just a Western media hoax.

    You really need to stop this BS about the Bolsheviks being 70% Jewish. You have no actual proof of this fact. It is all circular reasoning. Who is a Jew? Jewish name, mother, father aunt and uncle. You like MacDonald come into the argument with a bias against the Jews, and set up phony scenarios to prove your conclusion. It is fake data. Most Jews were not Bolsheviks and hated them for being godless.

    Scholars characterize MacDonald’s theory as a tendentious form of circular reasoning, which assumes its conclusion to be true regardless of empirical evidence. The theory fails the basic test of any scientific theory, the criterion of falsifiability, because MacDonald refuses to provide or acknowledge any factual pattern of Jewish behavior that would tend to disprove his idea that Jews have evolved to be ethnocentric and anti-white.[14] Other scholars in his field dismiss the theory as pseudoscience analogous to older conspiracy theories about a Jewish plot to undermine European civilization.[15]

    With regards to the main point of this thread about Jewish behavior deserving pushback from the Poles in the form of pogroms. I can bullet a few ideas for brevity.

    1. Probably true that Jews took advantage of uneducated Polish peasants in villages across Poland. But no one took more advantage of illiterate Polish peasants including usury than the aristocracy and feudal land system which kept Polish villager as eternal servants with no escape or upward mobility or chance to be educated.
    2. My family came from the pale settlement area, which was similar to the Polish villages, and all I heard was how the families boys would be conscripted into the Russian army at age 10 and up to never be seen again.
    3. Did the Jews deserve the harsh treatment? Cause and effect. Chicken and egg. Let’s start at the beginning. The Jews were demonized by the Catholic church early on 1st century for being Christ killers, which they were. The Jews thought Jesus was the worst thing to happen to Judaism. There is the source of the riff. During medieval times Jews used to hide during Easter holiday. The Catholic religion blamed the death of Jesus on the Jews, so did the people.

    The Jews killed Jesus, that was the main reason for medieval Jew hatred. Jew hatred caused Jews to be insular and devise ways to earn a living outside the box of local villagers. It was survival. Jews represent the same statistics of bad vs good as much as other populations and ethnicities. No one took advantage of the locals than the aristocracy.

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
$
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Andrew Joyce Comments via RSS
PastClassics
Analyzing the History of a Controversial Movement
Becker update V1.3.2
The Shaping Event of Our Modern World
The Surprising Elements of Talmudic Judaism
How America was neoconned into World War IV